Quarterlytics / Basic Materials / Oil & Gas Exploration & Production / JKX Oil and Gas PLC / FY2019 Annual Report

JKX Oil and Gas PLC
Annual Report 2019

JKXOF · OTC Basic Materials
Claim this profile
Ticker JKXOF
Exchange OTC
Sector Basic Materials
Industry Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Employees 501-1000
← All annual reports
FY2019 Annual Report · JKX Oil and Gas PLC
Loading PDF…
JKX Oil & Gas plc

2019

Annual Report

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

In this report

Strategic report

How we performed this year 

Our business 

Chairman’s statement  

Chief Executive’s statement 

Market overview  

Our business model 

2020 Strategic objectives 

Operations review 

Reserves update 

Performance in 2019 

Financial review  

Corporate social responsibility (CSR) review 

Principal risks and how we manage them 

Governance

Board composition  

Corporate governance  

Audit committee report  

Directors’ remuneration report  

Directors’ report – other disclosures  

Financial statements

Group

Independent auditors’ report  

Consolidated income statement  

01

02

04 

06 

08

12

13

16

18

20

22

25 

30

40

42

50

55

74

77

85

Consolidated statement of comprehensive income   87

Consolidated statement of financial position  

Consolidated statement of changes in equity  

Consolidated statement of cash flows  

Notes to the consolidated financial statements  

Company 

Company statement of financial position  

Company statement of changes in equity  

Notes to the Company financial statements  

88

89

90

91

129

130

131

1

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  2019

STRATEGIC REPORT

How we performed this year

Update:
2019 was another year of achievement for JKX. Strong production 
results allowed us to again report healthy profit and cash flow 
generation despite the much weaker gas sales prices in Ukraine.  
We continued our field development in Ukraine and completed our 
workover programme in Russia. The Group is now debt free. 

Revenue

Profit from operations  
before exceptional items*

Profit for the year

$101.7m

2018: $92.9m

$23.1m

2018: $20.7m

$22.2m

2018: $15.3m

Cash generated from continuing 
operations

Cash flow used in investing 
activities 

Total year-end cash

$41.4m

2018: $37.3m

$26.5m

2018: $12.8m

$20.6m

2018: $19.2m

Outlook:
•  Assets continue to generate positive cash flow despite recent oil and 

gas market turbulence. 

•  In Ukraine we are continuing our field development activities while 

also monitoring new opportunities.

•  We expect final decisions on most of the outstanding tax claims  

in 2020 and 2021.

*See page 23 for exceptional items.

2

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  2019

STRATEGIC REPORT

Our business

What we do

JKX is an oil and gas exploration and 
production company focused on  
eastern Europe.

Where we operate

MOSCOW

Russia

Ukraine

KIEV

POLTAVA

Elyzavetivske

Novomykolaivske Complex

Koshekhablskoye

MAIKOP

Black Sea

C

a

s

p

i

a

n

S

e

a

 
3

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  2019

Group statistics 

Licences

Total licence area, sq. km

Stage

Production

2019 Gas production, Mcmd

2019 Oil production, bopd

2019 total production, boepd

Reserves

2P reserves, MMboe

3P reserves, MMboe

2C resources, MMboe

Staff

*Includes Hungary.

Ukraine

Russia

Group*

1. Ignativske

1. Koshekhablskoye

13 licences

2. Elyzavetivske

3. Rudenkivske

4. Novomykolaivske

5. Movchanivske

6. Zaplavska

405

33

638

Exploration
Appraisal
Development
Production

Appraisal
Development
Production

Exploration
Appraisal
Development
Production

769

1,058

5,584

23.4

36.6

66.9

363

867

59

5,158

61.0

103.7

39.1

203

1,637

1,118

10,748

84.4

140.3

106

574

4

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  2019

STRATEGIC REPORT

Chairman’s statement

The new Board, appointed following the 2019 Annual General 
Meeting, consists of a diverse selection of experienced oil and 
gas industry professionals expert in the Group’s key focus areas. 
This new team has taken the months following its appointment 
to review the company’s business, to engage with its staff and 
to visit its operations in Russia and Ukraine. We have been 
impressed by the quality and commitment exhibited, traits that 
will be key to your company’s future successes. 

Outlook  
The Board and management will continue to devote their 
full attention to our core assets. In addition the Board will 
actively review material opportunities in our key focus areas 
where we can leverage our excellent financial and operational 
performance in order to obtain access to interesting prospects.

As part of this strategy we have already disposed of the Group’s 
Hungarian assets that were considered to be a distraction from 
the company’s core areas of expertise.

Clearly recent developments in the commodities’ markets are a 
significant and growing challenge, not just to those involved in 
the upstream sector, but to all involved in international business. 
Additionally, while our assets are robust and strongly cash 
generative, the situation regarding Covid-19 and its potential 
impact on the global economy and our operations remains 
uncertain and is rapidly changing. We continue to monitor the 
impact of these developments on our industry, our operations 
and - most importantly - our staff and contractors. 

During 2020 the Board will seek to foster an active and open 
communication with all our shareholders in order to explain its 
strategy and to discuss any concerns that they may have in order 
to ensure that all decisions are taken in the best interests of the 
Company as a whole.

People 
I am happy to report that our HSE performance in 2019 has been 
excellent, with no significant incidents recorded. 

I also take this opportunity to welcome the appointment of 
Victor Gladun as CEO and more recently Dmitriy Poddubnyy 
as  CFO. With their experience of  successfully managing our 
major operating subsidiary and the Group more generally I am 
sure that they will bring renewed focus to the senior executive 
team. I would like to thank JKX’s staff for ensuring continuity 
and smooth operations and in particular our outgoing CFO, Ben 
Fraser, for his commitment and hard work over the last three 
years.

Whilst significant challenges remain, such as the new reality 
of lower gas prices, international disruption driven by health 
concerns, technical difficulties in the field and the historical 
tax cases (where we have had a number of successes this year) 
I remain optimistic about the Company, whilst being realistic 
about the challenges that it continues to face. 

Charles Valceschini 
Chairman

I am pleased to be writing to you for the first 
time as Chairman of your Company, following 
my appointment in September 2019.

Before discussing the outcome of the 2019 financial year I would 
like to recognise the challenges that we are currently facing as 
a result of the Covid-19 pandemic impacting the countries in 
which we operate. I am pleased that we have been able to take 
proactive measures to protect our staff, contractors, suppliers 
and the communities in which we operate as well as increasing 
the resilience of our business. Further details of our response 
are set out in the risk section of this report. My thoughts are 
with all those impacted in this difficult time. 

Turning then to the Group’s financial performance in 2019,  
as our newly appointed Chief Executive Officer, Victor Gladun, 
remarks in his own report the results for the full 2019 year 
show it to have been another successful year. There has been 
positive progress in many key areas including operations 
(production volumes increased by 20% over 2018), finance 
(profitability increased by over 10% compared to 2018) and 
portfolio rationalisation. As a consequence the Company’s 
financial position has been further strengthened and it is now 
debt free, having benefitted from both improved cost control 
and increased production volumes and is reporting its second 
consecutive year of profit.

The Board continues to focus on the key areas identified in 
2018 and 2019 that will be fundamental to the Company’s 
future success:

•  Restoring a constructive relationship with the 

shareholders of the Company; 

•  Ensuring full operational and financial alignment 

between all companies of the Group; 

•  Operational risk management developing existing fields 

with proven, low risk technology;

•  Ensuring financial stability by building liquidity 
reserves and keeping tight control over cost; and

•  Resolving outstanding tax issues.

5

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  2019

6

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  2019

STRATEGIC REPORT

Chief Executive's statement

2019 was another year of achievement for 
JKX. Despite the collapse in commodity  
prices our strong production results allowed 
us to report healthy profit and cash flow for 
the second year in a row. The Group is now 
debt free.

Before discussing our performance in the 2019 financial year 
I would like to recognise the steps that are being taken by all 
our staff to keep their colleagues safe and the business running 
despite the challenges presented by the current Covid-19 
pandemic. We have implemented a range of pre-emptive 
measures, further discussed in the risk section of this report, in 
recognition of the fact that our people remain our greatest asset 
and their continuing health our priority. 

Our performance  
Strong production performance has enabled us to deliver 
positive financial performance despite the significantly lower 
gas price that we have experienced in our Ukrainian market 
where pricing is unregulated and follows international trends. 
Our Group revenue has exceeded $100m for the first time since 
2014 (2019: $102m, 2018: $93m) and our operational profit before 
exceptional items is up by over 10% year on year (2019: $23.1m, 
2018: $20.7m).

Our operations 
In both Ukraine and Russia we have kept our focus on 
operational risk management developing existing fields step 
by step with proven, low risk technology. Overall our fields 
have delivered a 20% year on year increase in Group annual 
production (2019: 10,748 boepd, 2018: 8,937 boepd).

This increase was underpinned by a more than 50% increase 
in annual production in Ukraine (2019: 5,584 boepd, 2018: 
3,677 boepd) where we continue to enjoy the results of the 
field development plan we have been executing since late 
2018. In 2019 our Ukrainian subsidiary drilled 4 new wells and 
completed 19 workovers as well as completing a 3D seismic 
survey in West Mashivska. The continuous use of the same low 
cost rig sourced from a local contractor for most of the drilling 
has meant that we have enjoyed improvements in operational 
performance, and the securing of a second rig with greater 
capacity allowed us to begin more technically challenging 
drilling in Rudenkivske in the third quarter of 2019.  

Meanwhile in Russia we have managed to maintain production 
at previous levels (2019: 5,158 boepd, 2018: 5,169 boepd) while at 
the same time completing the successful workover of two wells 
using a contracted rig selected by tender in 2018. The addition of 
these two wells to the producing well stock more than offset the 
production lost due to the continuing decline of Well 20.

I am pleased to report that in early March 2020 we have agreed 
a sale of our Hungarian business, which was non-producing, for 
expected consideration of approximately $2.9m, and that we 
expect this disposal to be finalised shortly. 

7

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  2019

Our financial stability 
The Group’s financial strength has been improved by both the 
paying down of long term debt and by the reduction in the level 
of provisions maintained for the outstanding legal cases.

Thanks to the cash generated by our operations we have in 
February 2019 and February 2020 made the final payments to 
our bondholders (capital repaid 2019: $5.4m, capital repaid 2020: 
$5.4m). The Group is now debt free for the first time in ten years.

We have continued our efforts to resolve the long outstanding 
tax issues that the company has faced and I am pleased to report 
that four of the eight cases relating to claims for underpayment 
of rental fees for 2015 made against our Ukrainian subsidiary 
PPC have now been closed in our favour. This has allowed us to 
reverse the provisions in our accounts for these four cases. We 
are continuing to defend our position in the courts in relation 
to the remaining 2015 rental fee claims and are still awaiting 
a final ruling from the Supreme Court in relation to a claim for 
disputed rental fees for 2010.

During 2019 we successfully filed an application for 
recognition in the Ukrainian courts of an award made to JKX of 
approximately $12.1m made by the Hague international tribunal 
and in 2020 we continue to carry out the appropriate procedures 
for the collection of this award.

Managing our risks 
The maintenance of an adequate internal control framework 
and appropriate risk management are essential to our success. 
Policies and procedures that have been implemented across the 
Group are subject to annual review to ensure that they remain 
appropriate and fit for purpose.

Geological and operational risks are intrinsic to our business. 
We seek to maintain and improve our internal expertise 
and supplement this with the use of appropriate contractors 
and specialists to mitigate these risks. In 2019 we enjoyed 
predominantly positive results from our new wells and 
workovers but we know that this cannot be taken for granted 
and we continue to take a measured approach using proven, 
low risk technology and diversifying our geological risk across 
different targets.

During 2019 we have, of course, seen a significant fall in the gas 
price in Ukraine, in line with the rest of Europe, and at the time 
of writing there is considerable turbulence in the financial and 
commodities' markets. We have to remain focussed on control 
of operational and administrative costs and, as we continue 
development of our fields in Ukraine, we perform regular 
economic analysis of our planned capital projects to ensure that 
profitability is central to our decision making. 

In recent weeks we have also seen the escalation of the Covid-19 
pandemic globally.  Whilst our operations have to date seen little 
impact we are focused on implementing measures to ensure the 
safety of our people and contractors and prepare the business to 
face potential challenges that may emerge.  Further details are 
set out in section 'Principle risks and how we manage them' on 
pages 30-39.

Outlook 
The well workover programme in Russia has been successfully 
completed meaning that our operations there, with increased 
profitability and free from further workover capex 
requirements in the short term, can contribute more positive 
cash flow to the Group. In addition to this, the agreement of the 
disposal of the Hungarian assets has allowed management to 
focus in 2020 on Ukraine where we are engaged in both further 
development of our existing assets and monitoring of new 
opportunities.

While I recognise the challenges we face, including the emerging 
challenges that Covid-19 may present against a backdrop 
of uncertainty in the oil and gas markets, I take confidence 
from the talents and continued dedication of our staff and 
our improved financial strength. I am optimistic about the 
ability of the Company to prosper and would like to assure 
all shareholders that the Board and management remain 
committed to continuing to deliver production growth combined 
with positive financial results.

Victor Gladun
Director
Chief Executive Officer 

8

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  2019

STRATEGIC REPORT

Market overview - Ukraine
Why are we here?

Ukraine is our most important market, 
providing most of our cash flow. 

Regulatory and investment climate 
Applicable rental fees for new wells are 12% for those less than 
5,000 metres and 6% for those deeper than 5,000 metres.  

The investment climate in Ukraine’s gas production sector is 
favourable.  The government has announced an “Open Door 
Policy for Investors”.  The State Geologic and Subsoil Survey 
of Ukraine is focussed on making processes more efficient, 
treating all subsoil users fairly and attracting new investment 
into the sector.

Access to geologic data has been improved.  A transparent 
process for electronic auctioning of oil and gas field licences 
is in place and there is the opportunity to invest in Production 
Sharing Agreements (PSA).  In 2019, 19 licences were sold 
via electronic auction and 9 PSA tenders were concluded and 
similar opportunities are available in 2020.

Ukraine has completed “unbundling” the national oil & gas 
company Naftogaz, which is an important step towards further 
transparency and liberalization of the gas market. Under the 
new transit agreement concluded between Ukraine and Russia, 
gas transmission entry tariffs are not expected to increase for 
domestic gas producers. 

Gas consumption still exceeds Ukrainian domestic production, 
which leaves an incentive for us to increase our production 
further. The gas market remains liberal. 

Reserves 
Ukraine holds 1.1 trillion cubic metres (37 trillion cubic feet) 
of proven gas reserves - the second largest proven reserves in 
Europe. JKX’s expertise in this market, gained through more 
than 25 years of successful business in the Ukraine, leaves 
us well placed to take advantage of the emerging investment 
opportunities.  The company is considering the acquisition of 
new licences.

Total proven gas reserves in Europe

Trillion cubic meters

1.7

2.0

1.5

1.0

0.5

0.0

1.1

0.7

Norway

Ukraine

Netherlands

Source: BP Statistical Review of World Energy

0.2

United 
Kingdom

0.1

0.1

Poland

Romania

Ukraine's gas balance 1991-2019 (bcm)

150

120

90

60

30

0

-30

3
9
9
1

4
9
9
1

5
9
9
1

6
9
9
1

7
9
9
1

8
9
9
1

9
9
9
1

0
0
0
2

1
0
0
2

2
0
0
2

3
0
0
2

4
0
0
2

5
0
0
2

6
0
0
2

7
0
0
2

8
0
0
2

9
0
0
2

0
1
0
2

1
1
0
2

2
1
0
2

3
1
0
2

4
1
0
2

5
1
0
2

6
1
0
2

7
1
0
2

8
1
0
2

9
1
0
2

Source: Energobusiness; Company Research.

Ukraine's gas price premium ($/Mcm)

500

400

300

200

100

0

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

Source: Company Research.

Imports from Russia

Imports from Central Asia

Domestic production

Imports from Europe

Exports

Ukraine

TTF

Henry Hub

9

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  2019

Netback

Netback analysis of gas sales (at $206.0/Mcm in 2019
and $307.8/Mcm in 2018)

JKX’s assets in Ukraine

$39.4 (19%)

$54.6 (27%)

$53.2 (18%)

$81.4 (26%)

$111.9 (54%)

$173.2 (56%)

2019

2018

Production costs

Production taxes

Net 

Netback analysis of oil sales (at $61.0/bbl in 2019
and $74.0/bbl in 2018)

$9.2 (15%)

$15.3 (25%)

$9.0 (12%)

$19.2 (26%)

D N I E P E R - D O N E T S 

B A S I N

Kiev

Ukraine 

Elyzavetivske

Novomykolaivske  
Complex

Russia 

Black Sea 

Novomykolaivske Complex    
Our Novomykolaivske Complex 
reserves comprise five distinct fields 
producing in to one GPF. In addition 
we have a Liquefied Petroleum Gas 
(‘LPG’) facility which converts some 
of our gas into LPG for sale into the 
expanding Ukrainian market.

Elyzavetivske field   
Our Elyzavetivske license and 
GPF, which are 45km from our 
Novomykolaivske Complex, began 
commercial production in 2014.  
The field currently produces from  
ten wells.

Ukrainian reserves    
At the end of 2019, our 2P reserves in 
Ukraine comprised 3,061 MMcm of 
gas and  2.1 MMbbl of oil (total 23.4 
MMboe including 3.2 MMboe of LPG).

Project life cycle

Reserves

$36.5 (60%)

$45.7 (62%)

Novomykolaivske Complex

Reserves split

2019

2018

Production costs

Production taxes

Net 

Principal risks associated with our business  
in Ukraine (detail on pages 30-39)

Liquidity, funding, and portfolio management

Commodity prices and FX fluctuations

Reservoir and operational performance

A

H

C

25 years

of commercial production to date 

77.3% gas

13.7%

9.0%

77.3%

Gas 

LPG

Oil

4
9
9
1

9
1
0
2

7
3
0
2

Movchanivske

Ignativske

Novomykolaivske

Rudenkivske

Zaplavska

Elyzavetivske field

6 years

of commercial production to date 

5
9
9
1

9
1
0
2

8
2
0
2

 
10

STRATEGIC REPORT

Market overview - Russia
Why are we here?

We have access to high quality, long 
life reserves in Russia together with an 
established processing facility. 

Whilst gas prices are regulated, they are stable and increase 
year on year. According to the latest forecast by the Russian 
Ministry of Economic Development, gas prices are expected 
to continue rising steadily in the next 5 years. We remain 
committed to increasing  production volumes closer to the plant 
capacity, in order to maximise return on the capital expenditure 
invested. 

Despite Russia’s overall gas surplus, Russia’s southern regions 
are short of gas with consumption exceeding production by more 
than three times. Whilst Russia’s average gas consumption has 
stagnated in recent years, Russia’s southern regions such as 
Krasnodar have continued to grow.

Our Koshekhablskoye field is located in the Autonomous 
Republic of Adygea in southern Russia. This region enjoys 
some of the country’s highest gas prices. This is because the 
gas industry’s key reference price  - the regulated price for 
industrial consumers set for Gazprom - is set based on the 
distance from Russia’s key producing region - Nadym Pur Taz 
(NPT) in Russia’s far north.  Adygea is located more than  
4,000 km from NPT.  

Adygean regional authorities are proactively working on 
investment projects aimed at boosting industrial potential, 
and as the major local energy supplier we look forward to their 
development.

Due to the depth of the main production horizons in our 
Koshekhablskoye field, we enjoy a significant production tax 
break as compared to other non-Gazprom producers.

Notwithstanding our access to some of the highest regional gas 
prices in Russia, we continue to seek opportunities to increase 
gas sales margins, particularly by direct gas sales to end users. 
In the longer term we remain extremely well placed for any 
liberalisation of the gas market in Russia.

Regulated gas pricing by region  (RUB/Mcm)

Region

YaNAO

KhMAO

Chelyabinsk

Samara

Moscow

Adygeya

Netback

Residential
price

Industrial  
price

2609

3049

3651

3702

3807

3858

2610

3071

4059

4272

4760

4859

Netback analysis of gas sales (at $57.0/Mcm in 2019 and $58.3/Mcm in 
2018)

$21.9 (38%)

$5.6 (10%)

$29.5 (52%)

$27.0 (46%)

$5.7 (10%)

$25.6 (44%)

2019

2018

Production costs

Production taxes

Net 

Southern Russia gas supply and demand (Bcm)

80.0

70.0

60.0

50.0

40.0

30.0

20.0

10.0

0.0

13.1

53.9

18.3

Supply

Demand

Gas production

Gas export

Gas consumption 

Source: Company Research.

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  201911

JKX’s assets in Russia

Ukraine 

Rostov-on-Don

Russia 

Krasnodar

Koshekhablskoye

Maikop

R E P U B L I C 
O F   A DY G E A

Black Sea 

Koshekhablskoye field   
Koshekhablskoye gas field is located 
in the Republic of Adygea, southern 
Russia where gas resource is scarce, 
and there are high transportation 
costs from Russia’s main gas 
production area in the far north,  
some 4,000 km away.

Russian reserves  
At the end of 2019, our 2P reserves in 
Russia comprised of 10,246 MMcm 
of gas and 0.7 MMbbl of oil (total 61.0 
MMboe).

Koshekhablskoye  
project life cycle

Reserves

Total project life cycle

Reserves split

7 years  
of commercial production to date 

99% gas

 1%

2
1
0
2

9
1
0
2

9
6
0
2

 99%

Gas 

Oil

Principal risks associated with our business  
in Russia (detail on pages 30-39)

Geopolitical and fiscal risks

Reservoir and operational performance

B

C

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  201912

STRATEGIC REPORT

Our business model

We strive to create value for our stakeholders 
by investing in exploration for appraisal and 
development of oil and gas assets in eastern 
Europe.  

We generate revenue from production and 
sales of oil, gas, condensate and LPG. Cash 
flow is distributed to our stakeholders and 
reinvested in our business.

Cash is distributed among our stakeholders

Exploration

Appraisal

Government

Suppliers

Asset life  
cycle 

Stakeholders

Investors

Employees

Production

Development

Local community

Cash is invested in existing and new assets

We manage a portfolio of assets in Ukraine and Russia.  
We aim to evaluate where we can add the most value and manage our portfolio accordingly.

Exploration
We use highly experienced in-house and contracted technical staff 
to help us identify exploration targets both within our portfolio and 
elsewhere. However, exploration activity is currently not what we are 
focused on.

Appraisal
A large number of legacy wells are located in and around the area of  
the mature assets operated by JKX. Dedicated efforts to gain access  
and evaluate valuable data from these wells allow JKX to greatly 
reduce risks and costs of its appraisal activities and optimize further 
development planning.

Development
We strive to manage our field development based on ‘what’s possible’  
in petroleum engineering, physics and execution.

  Production
JKX has engaged experts in the latest drilling, completion, and 
engineering technology from countries we operate in and abroad. 
Although production decline is a characteristic of oil & gas assets, we 
strive to minimize decline within our mature fields by identifying and 
executing production enhancement and workover opportunities.

Government. 
Payments to government include production, payroll, corporate, VAT, 
land, utility, licensing and other taxes and fees. Through payment of 
taxes and fees we support local and national economies.

Suppliers
Payments to suppliers are made for equipment, materials and services. 
Where possible, we purchase local goods and services and develop 
infrastructure that benefits the entire community. However, using new 
technologies proven internationally is important for maximizing returns 
from investing in and developing our assets.  

Employees
We provide jobs in developed, emerging and developing economies, 
creating local purchasing power and improving standards of living.

Local community
We support local communities through providing both funding and staff 
time and commitment to charitable causes in Ukraine and Russia.

Investors
We deploy capital provided by our investors, and aim to realize attractive 
return on investments while adhering to our commitments.

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  201913

STRATEGIC REPORT

2020 Strategic objectives

Our objective is to be a leading independent, 
emerging market upstream company and 
enhance shareholder value by increasing oil 
and gas production and cash flow through 
safe and responsible operations.

Our strategic priorities are:

1. Financial and operational stability 
The technical challenges inherent in our business, commodity price 
volatility and the need to be able to react to future risks and opportunities 
mean that we have an emphasis on maintaining a liquidity reserve, 
maintaining strong governance and controls, and effectively managing 
operational, technical, and subsurface risks.

2. Profitable production growth  
Our future production profile underpins the value of the Group. We aim 
to maximise production from our existing fields, and to grow our reserve 
base and hence production through either successful exploration and 
appraisal activities within our existing assets, or through acquisition of 
new ones.

3. Operating safely and responsibly 
We work in environments that are challenging and hazardous by nature. 
As well as operating efficiently, it is vital that we also operate safely and 
responsibly. Our behaviour impacts on our employees, our shareholders, 
the wider community and the environment. Our performance in the 
society in which we operate, and the environment, are a critical part of 
measuring our overall performance.

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  201914

STRATEGIC REPORT

2020 Strategic priorities

Strategic priority

Strategic priority

1

Financial and operational stability

2

Profitable production growth

Key targets 2020

Key targets 2020

•  Growing our liquidity reserve through maximizing the cash 

•  Continue implementing five year development plan in Ukraine

flow and access to external funding

•  Maintaining strong and stable governance 

•  Focus on low-risk investments and use of proven  

technologies

•  Resolution of most of the outstanding rental fee claim cases

•  Maintain production and positive cash flow generation

•  Review other growth opportunities in Ukraine

Performance to date

Operating cash flow from 
continuing operations,  
$million

Liquidity (cash and available 
facilities), $million

Production volumes, boepd

EBITDA $per boe

Performance to date

41.4

37.3

50

40

30

20

10

0

14.2

40

30

20

10

0

5.3

6.9

11.9

19.2

13.9

20.6

12000

10000

8000

6000

4000

2000

0

10,748

8,657

8,937

10.9

10.6

8.0

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

2017

2018

2019

2017

2018

2019

2017

2018

2019

2017

2018

2019

Cash

Facilities

EBITDA is defined on page 21

Associated principal risks

Associated principal risks

(detail on pages 30 to 39)

Liquidity, funding, and portfolio management

Financial discipline and governance 

A

D

(detail on page 30 to 39)

Geopolitical and fiscal risks 

Reservoir and operational performance

Commodity prices and FX fluctuation

B

C

H

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  201915

Strategic priority

3

Operating safely and responsibly

Key targets 2020

•  Zero fatalities

•  To exceed internal and industry targets for AIFR, LTI, and EIFR

Performance to date

Fatalities

All Injury Frequency Rate  
(‘AIFR’)

Lost Time Injury (‘LTI’) cases

Environmental Incident 
Frequency Rate (‘EIFR’)

3

2

1

0

1

0

0

2

1

0

0

0.19

0

3

2

1

0

0

0

0

0.59

0.32

0.80

0.60

0.40

0.20

0.00

0.07

2017

2018

2019

2017

2018

2019

2017

2018

2019

2017

2018

2019

Associated principal risks

(detail on page 30 to 39)

Health, Safety, and Environment

Major breach of business, ethical, or compliance standards 

E

G

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  201916

STRATEGIC REPORT

Operations review

Group production

In 2019 group average production was 10,748 boepd (2018: 8,937 boepd), an overall increase 
in production of 20%. The increase in production year-on-year was a result of the ongoing 
drilling and workover programme in Ukraine.  

Group production

Cash generating unit

Novomykolaivske complex

Elyzavetivske licence

Total Ukraine

Russia

Hungary 

Total Group

*Includes abandonments.

boepd

Workovers*

Sidetracks

New wells

2019

4,127

1,457

5,584

5,158

6

10,748

2018

2,414

1,263

3,677

5,169

91

8,937

2019

2018

2019

2018

2019

2018

17

2

19

2

0

21

18

2

20

0

0

20

0

0

0

0

0

0

2

0

2

0

0

2

2

2

4

0

0

4

0

1

1

0

0

1

Gas and oil production increased year-on-year in both cash generating units in Ukraine and stayed flat in Russia. 

Gas, Mcmd

Oil, bopd

boepd

Cash generating unit

2019

2018

527

242

769

867

1

286

211

497

868

14

2019

1,025

33

1,058

59

1

2018

731

20

751

58

7

2019

4,127

1,457

5,584

5,158

6

1,637

1,379

1,118

816

10,748

2018

2,414

1,263

3,677

5,169

91

8,937

Novomykolaivske complex

Elyzavetivske licence

Total Ukraine

Russia

Hungary 

Total Group

Ukraine

Novomykolaivske complex production and operations

boepd

Workovers

Sidetracks

New wells

Field name

Ignativske

Molchanivske

Novomykolaivske

Rudenkivske

2019

3,069

355

398

305

2018

1,395

346

286

387

2019

2018

2019

2018

2019

2018

7

5

1

4

6

2

2

8

0

0

0

0

0

1

1

0

0

2

1

0

1

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

Novomykolaivske complex

4,127

2,414

17

18

The increase in Novomykolaivske complex production year-on-year was mostly attributed to production from the IG103 sidetrack 
drilled at the end of 2018 and a new well, IG142, drilled in 2019 in the Ignativske field. The increase in oil production in the 
Novmykolaivske complex was mostly attributed to a new well, NN81, drilled in the Novomykolaiske field. 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  201917

Outlook 
Following the success of IG103 sidetrack and IG142 in the Devonian reservoir of the Ignativske field there are follow-up wells planned 
to this reservoir in 2020. One of these is a new well, IG143, which is targeting a separate fault block to the west of IG103 ST. 

Following the success of NN81 in 2019 finding a new oil reservoir in the V16 there are follow-up wells planned to target the V16 both in 
the Ignativske and Novomykolaivske licenses.

In Rudenkivske, the completion of R101 sidetrack is on-going and is expected to be completed in April 2020. Meanwhile a subsurface 
study is being carried out by an external contractor in order to refine the field development plan for the Devonian in Rudenkivkse. 
Once this study is complete in Q2 2020 the results will be used to plan a well to the Devonian in Rudenkivske.

Elyzavetivske licence production and operations

Field name

Elyzavetivske

West Mashivska

Elyzavetivske Licence

boepd

Workovers

New wells

2019

996

462

1,458

2018

1,177

86

1,263

2019

2018

2019

2018

0

2

2

1

1

2

0

2

2

1

0

1

The increase in production from the Elyzavetivske license was mainly the result of the successful completion of the first new well 
in the West Mashivske field, WM3 which is producing from the A8 reservoir. A second well in the West Mashivske field was also 
completed and is producing from the G8 reservoir.

Outlook 
In 2020 methods of increasing production from the G8 in WM4 will be investigated. Compression is also being investigated for the 
Elizavetivske plant which would benefit both the wells in the Elizavetivske and West Mashivske fields.

Further subsurface work will be carried out in order to determine whether there are any opportunities for further drilling in the West 
Mashivske field.

Russia

Koshekhablskoye licence production and operations

Well name

Well 5

Well 18

Well 20

Well 25

Well 27

Koshekhablskoye field*

*Includes Well 15 production.

boepd

Workovers

2018

2019

2018

0

0

1,733

1,693

1,665

5,169

1

1

0

0

0

2

0

0

0

0

0

0

2019

263

78

1,353

1,735

1,672

5,158

In 2019 both Well 5 and Well 18 were successfully worked over and sidetracked. Well 5 production was significantly less than expected 
whereas production from Well 18 met expectations after only one acid job. The rig has since been demobilised. 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  2019 
18

STRATEGIC REPORT

Reserves update

JKX was audited by RPS Energy Consultants Ltd. (“RPS”) in accordance with the SPE Petroleum 
Resources Management System (“PRMS”) 2018 for the 2019 annual report, effective date 31st 
December 2019.

The tables below give the 2P Reserves reported by RPS as a result of the audit. The most significant change is in Russia and is due 
to the lower than expected production rate of Well 5. LPG has been included this year for the first time due to a change of reference 
point. 

The methodology followed for the audit was to estimate Hydrocarbons Initially in Place (HIIP) only for reservoirs with significant 
future development plans. For the remainder of the fields where there was no significant future development planned, Reserves 
were estimated using decline curve analysis.

The evaluation of Hungary was not included in the RPS audit. The year-end 2018 reserves were updated internally. JKX working 
interest for all licenses in Ukraine and Russia is 100%.

Total remaining 2P reserves at 31 December 2019

Total
Oil (MMbbl)
Gas (MMcm)
LPG (MMbbl)

Oil + Gas + LPG (MMboe)

Ukraine
Oil (MMbbl)
Gas MMcm
LPG (MMbbl)

Oil + Gas + LPG (MMboe)

Russia
Oil (MMbbl)
Gas (MMcm)

Oil + Gas (MMboe)

31-Dec-18

Revisions

Production

31-Dec-19

3.2
15,415
-

93.9

2.5
3,676
-

24.2

0.7
11,740

69.8

0.0
(1,510)
3.2

(5.7)

0.0
(334)
3.2

1.2

0.0
(1,177)

(6.9)

(0.4)
(597)*
-

(3.9)

(0.4)
(281)
-

(2.0)

(0.0)
(316)

(1.9)

2.8
13,308
3.2

84.4

2.1
3,061
3.2

23.4

0.7
10,247

61.0

*0.4 MMcm produced in Hungary. Note there are minor difference in the tables due to rounding effects.

Field-by-Field 2P reserves at 31 December 2019

MMboe

Dec-18

Revisions

Production

Dec-19

Ukraine
Ignativske
Movchanivske
Novomykolaivske
Rudenkivske
Zaplavska  LPG Novomykolaivske complex

Sub-total Novomykolaivske complex licences
Elyzavetivske

Total Ukraine

Russia
Koshekhablskoye

Total

5.2
0.5
0.8
15.2
-

21.7
2.5

24.2

69.8

93.9

(0.5)
0.2
0.3
(1.7)
3.2

1.5
(0.3)

1.2

(6.9)

(5.7)

(1.1)
(0.1)
(0.1)
(0.1)
-

(1.5)
(0.5)

(2.0)

(1.9)

(3.9)

3.6
0.6
0.9
13.4
3.2

21.7
1.7

23.4

61.0

84.4

Reserves reported gross of royalties and includes fuel gas (Novomykolaivske -1.8 MMboe (298 MMcm), Elyzavetivske - 0.1 MMboe (17 MMcm) and Koshekhabslskoye - 2.5  

MMboe (425 MMcm))

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  2019 
 
19

JKX contingent resources

RPS estimated contingent resources for the reservoirs and fields listed below.

Field

Ignativske

Movchanivske

Novomykolaivske

Rudenkivske

West Mashivska

Koshekhablskoye

Reservoir

V16

Mol Main Devonian

V15

V16

Visean sands

Tournaisian Clastics

Devonian Clastics

A1+A2

A8

G8

Oxfordian

Callovian I-IV

Callovian V-VI

1C (low)

MMboe

2C (best)

3C (high)

0.0

0.0

0.2

0.0

0.2

11.8

17.1

0.1

0.5

0.9

6.3

12.9

2.8

0.3

0.0

0.3

0.1

4.1

26.2

32.6

0.3

1.0

2.0

4.5

28.5

6.2

1.3

0.6

0.5

0.6

15.3

49.9

60.5

0.5

2.0

3.7

0.0

54.5

11.8

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  201920

STRATEGIC REPORT

Performance in 2019

OPERATING RESULTS

Revenue

Oil

Gas

Liquefied petroleum gas

Other

Cost of sales
Exceptional item – production based taxes

Other production based taxes

Depreciation, depletion and amortisation - oil and gas assets

Other cost of sales

Total cost of sales

Gross profit

Administrative expenses

(Loss)/gain on foreign exchange

Profit from operations before exceptional items

Profit from operations after exceptional items

Note: there are minor differences in the tables above due to rounding effects.

Total 
2019
$m

Second half 
2019
$m

First half 
2019
$m

25

69

6.6

1.1

101.7

8.4

(23.5)

(18.5)

(22.8)

(56.4)

45.4

(13.2)

(0.6)

23.1

31.6

15.2

36.5

3.7

1.0

56.4

10.7

(10.8)

(9.6)

(13.9)

(23.6)

32.8

(7.5)

(0.3)

14.2

25.0

9.8

32.5

2.9

0.1

45.3

(2.3)

(12.7)

(8.9)

(8.9)

(32.8)

12.5

(5.7)

(0.3)

8.9

6.6

Total
 2018
$m

20.0

66.4

5.6

0.9

92.9

(5.1)

(21.9)

(14.8)

(20.7)

(62.5)

30.3

(13.9)

(0.7)

20.7

15.7

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  2019 
 
 
 
 
21

EARNINGS

Profit before tax

Net Profit ($m)

Net profit before exceptional items ($m)

Basic weighted average number of shares in issue (m)

Profit per share after exceptional item (basic, cents) 

Pre-exceptional earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and 
amortisation ($m)1

COSTS OF PRODUCTION ($/boe)

Operating costs  (excluding exceptional item)

Depreciation, depletion and amortisation

Production based taxes

CASH FLOW

Cash generated from continuing operations ($m)

Operating cash flow per share (cents)

STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION

Total cash2 ($m)

Borrowings (excluding derivatives) ($m) 

Net cash/(debt)3 ($m)

Net cash/(debt) to equity (%)

Return on average capital employed (%)4

Increase in property, plant and equipment/
intangible assets ($m)

Ukraine 

Russia

Total

Total 
2019

30.4

22.2

13.2

168.1

7.88

42.3

Second half 
2019

First half 
2019

24.4

20.0

9.4

169.5

6.56

24.1

6.0

2.2

3.8

166.7

1.32

18.2

Total 
2019

Second half 
2019

First half 
2019

5.8

4.8

6.0

Total 
2019

41.4

24.6

6.7

4.7

5.2

5.9

4.9

6.9

Second half 
2019

First half 
2019

29.2

17.3

12.2

7.3

Total
 2018 

14.0

15.3

18.6

166.7

11.13

35.5

Total
 2018 

6.4

4.6

6.8

Total
 2018 

37.3

22.4

At 31 December 
2019

At 30 June
2019

At 31 December
 2018 

20.6

(5.7)

14.9

8.0

14.4

20.5

8.9

29.4

12.7

5.9

18.6

10.6

(5.6)

5

3.2

2.9

7.8

3

10.8

19.2

(11.0)

8.2

5.8

8.2

11.1

0.7

11.8

1  Earnings before interest, tax, profit and amortisation (‘EBITDA’) is a non-IFRS measure and calculated using profit from operations adding back depletion, depreciation, 
  amortisation. EBITDA is an indicator of the Group’s ability to generate operating cash flow that can fund its working capital needs, service debt obligations and fund capital 
  expenditures. 

2   Total cash is cash and cash equivalents from continuing operations.

3   Net debt is total cash less borrowings (excluding derivatives). 
4    Return on average capital employed is the annualised profit for the period divided by average capital employed. 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  2019 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
22

STRATEGIC REPORT

Financial review

Ben Fraser   
Chief Financial Officer 

2019’s strong operating cash flows 
have allowed us to pay off our 
outstanding bonds in February 
2020, thus making us debt free - a 
very important milestone for us as 
we continue to work  to improve the 
Group’s balance sheet.

Group revenues*

9.5% 

2019
($m)

2018
($m)

Change
($m)

% 
Change

Ukraine

Gas

Oil 

Liquefied  Petroleum
Gas (‘LPG’)

Other 

Russia

Gas

Condensate

Other

Total

84.3

52.3

24.3

6.6

1.1

17.4

16.7

0.7

-

101.7

74.9

49.2

19.3

5.6

0.8

17.8

17.2

0.6

0.2

92.9

9.4

3.1

5

1.0

0.3

(0.4)

(0.5)

0.1

(0.2)

8.8

12.6%

6.3%

25.9%

17.9%

37.5%

(2.2%)

(2.9%)

6.7%

N/A

9.5%

*note this excludes Hungary that is presented as a discontinued operation in the 
financial statements.

Sales prices 

Ukraine

Gas ($/Mcm)

Oil ($/bbl)

LPG ($/tonne)

Russia

Gas ($/Mcm)

2019

2018

Change

%
 Change

206

61

449

308

74

544

(102)

(13)

(95)

(33%)

(18%)

(17%)

57

58

(1)

(2%)

Average exchange rates

Russia (RUB/$)

Ukraine (UAH/$)

2019

64.6

25.8

2018

Change

62.9

27.2

(1.7)

1.4

 %
Change

(2.7)

5.1

Results for the year  
2019 was another profitable year for the Group. We are pleased 
to report profit before tax of $30.4m which compares favourably 
to the profit $14.0m reported for 2018. Results for both years 
include net movements in respect of provisions for disputed 
rental fees for 2010 and 2015 in Ukraine (credit of $8.4m in 2019 
and charge of $5.1m in 2018).

Total revenue for 2019 is $101.7m, 9.5% higher than the $92.9m 
reported in 2018 and above $100m for the first time since 2014. 
This was achieved despite the 33% lower gas sales prices in 
Ukraine thanks to the increase in total average daily Group 
production from 8,937 boepd in 2018 to 10,748 boepd in 2019. 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  201923

We generated significant EBITDA at the same time as continuing 
to make substantial investment in the fields in Ukraine and 
Russia. 

2019’s strong operating cash flows have allowed us to pay off 
our outstanding bonds in February 2020, thus making us debt 
free - a very important milestone for us as we continue to work to 
improve the Group’s balance sheet.

Ukraine revenues 
The $9.4m increase in total revenues was due to higher sales 
volumes offset by lower sales prices, as shown in the table.

The average gas sales price in dollar terms was 33.1% lower 
in 2019 than in 2018. This is in line with international market 
trends. Total gas sales volumes increased by 58% from 159,887 
Mcm in 2018 to 257,030 Mcm in 2019, primarily due to the gas 
production volume having increased 54.9% from 181,482 Mcm 
in 2018 to 280,673 Mcm in 2019. The increase in production was 
a result of the on-going drilling and workover activity started in 
2018 and continued throughout 2019. For more detail please refer 
to the Regional operations' update.     

The average oil sales price decreased from $74/bbl in 2018 to 
$61/bbl in 2019 and total oil sales volumes for the year increased 
46.2% from 261,420 barrels in 2018 to 382,200 barrels in 2019. Oil 
production volume increased 36.3% from 274,087 barrels in 2018 
to 373,616 barrels in 2019. 

LPG sales volumes were 10,294 tonnes in 2018 compared to 
13,636 tonnes in 2019, with sales prices being lower in 2019 
($449/tonne in 2019 compared to $544/tonne in 2018). 

Inventory held at 31 December 2019 (14 million cubic metres of 
gas and 27 thousand barrels of oil) had an estimated sales value 
of $4.1m using average sales prices for December 2019.  

A portion of production comes from wells owned by third parties, 
operated under service agreements with UkrGasVidobuvannya 
and under rental agreements with NAK Nadra Ukrayini and 
Ukrnafta. This production is subject to sale in the normal way, 
with payments being made to the well owners in accordance with 
the service and rental agreements.

Russia revenues 
Total revenues in Russia were flat year-on-year as gas volumes 
were maintained at similar levels (2019: 314,446 Mcm, 
2018:316,996 Mcm) despite the intensive workover programme. 
The benefit of the 1.4% increase in the average rouble gas sales 
price on 1 July 2019 was offset by the slightly weaker Rouble 
 in 2019.

Cost of sales  
Exceptional items relate to provisions for disputed rental fees. 
A release of $14.4m of provisions due to the closure of some of 
the 2015 rental fee claims in favour of our subsidiary was offset 
by an additional charge of $6.0m reflecting updated interest 
calculations in relation to the rental fee claims still provided for 
as set out in Note 18. 

Cost of sales before exceptional items for 2019 totalled $64.8m 
(2018:$57.5m), including:

•  $23.5m of production taxes, which were $1.7m higher than in 
2018 due to the higher production taxes incurred in Ukraine 
(2019:$21.8m, 2018:$20.1m) where we had higher volumes. 
Only $1.8m of the total production taxes relate to Russia 
(2018: $1.8m) where the mineral extraction tax rate for wells 
deeper than 5,000m has remained at 340 Roubles/Mcm.

•  $22.9m of operating costs, of which $14.7m relates to Ukraine 

(2018:$12.1m) and $7.0m relates to Russia (2018:$8.6m) and 
$0.6m relates to central costs. The increase in operating 
costs in Ukraine is mainly due to the introduction of the gas 
capacity fee (2019:$1.4m, 2018:nil) and the overall increase in 
field activity. 

•  $18.4m of depreciation, depletion and amortisation charge 
(2018:$14.7m) which is larger due to the higher production 
volumes and the recent higher levels of capital expenditure.
Analysis showing production costs, production taxes and 
netbacks for both our Ukrainian and Russian operations is 
shown on pages 9 and10.

Administrative expenses  
Administrative expenses were $13.2m in 2019, comparing 
favourably to those of $13.9m in 2018. The decrease is mainly due 
to staff cost reductions resulting from a right-sizing exercise 
carried out during 2018 and lower legal and professional fees. In 
the Company's London office we exited the long-term lease of one 
of the office floors in May 2019 and closed a data centre.

Finance income and costs 
Finance costs decreased from $2.5m in 2018 to $2.1m in 2019. 
This mainly consists of the bond interest which reduced from 
$2.1m to $1.4m due to the repayment of principal outstanding in 
February 2019. Finance costs also includes unwinding of discount 
of provisions for site restoration of $0.6m (2018: $0.4m). 

Finance income of $0.9m (2018: $0.9m) comprises income from 
bank deposits.

Taxation  
The total tax charge for 2019 is $10.2m (2018: $2.2m) comprising 
a current tax charge of $6.6m (2018: $5.5m) which relates to 
Ukraine and a deferred tax charge of $3.6m (2018: credit $3.2m).  
The increase in current tax charge reflects a higher profitability 
in Ukraine. The deferred tax relates to movements in various 
deferred tax assets and liabilities in Ukraine and Russia as set 
out in Note 25 to the financial statements. 

Discontinued operation  
The discontinued operation is the Hungarian business. The 
related gain reported reflects both the running costs incurred 
during 2019 and the part reversal of a previous impairment 
charge following the sale of the business currently expected to be 
valued at approximately $2.9m that was agreed in March 2020. 

Capital Expenditure  
We continue to balance the need to improve liquidity while 
also recognising the need for long-term investment. Of the 
$28.8m oil and gas capital expenditure incurred during the 
year (2018:$11.3m), $19.9m relates to Ukraine where field 
development continued as planned. $8.9m relates to Russia, 
where the well workover programme was completed. 

Cash flows  
During the year the Group’s available cash balances in continuing 
operations remained approximately at the same level ($20.6m 
at 31 December 2019 compared to $19.2m at 31 December 2018) 
while at the same time decreasing its borrowings from $11.0m 
to $5.7m and investing significant capital expenditure in our 
operations in 2019. This was achieved as a result of strong 
operating cash flow of $41.4m (2018:$37.3m) from continuing 
operations, almost all of it generated in Ukraine. Use of cash 
during the year is as shown in the cash bridge on the next page. 
Net cash outflow from financing activities in the period mainly 
relates to the $5.3m payment to the bondholders in February 
2019. No dividends were paid to shareholders in the period (2018: 
nil).

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  201924

STRATEGIC REPORT

Financial review

Cash flows ($m)

70.0

60.0

50.0

40.0

30.0

20.0

10.0

0.0

41.4

(1.1)

(7.1)

19.2

(27.4)

0.9

20.6

(5.3)

31 
December 
2018

Cash 
generated 
from 
continuing 
operations 

Interest 
paid

Income tax 
paid

Capital 
expenditure  
additions

Bond 
repayment

Interest 
received and 
other cash 
movements

31 
December 
2019

Liquidity outlook 
After a final payment of $5.8m to bond holders in February 
2020 the Group is now debt free. Our subsidiary in Ukraine still 
has a 24 month UAH280m ($11.8m) revolving credit line and a 
UAH50m ($2.1m) overdraft facility with Tascombank, neither 
of which are currently being used and can be drawn down 
subject to credit approvals by the bank. Both facilities have been 
renewed until December 2021 and can be drawn down subject 
to credit approvals by the bank. In addition to our continued 
focus on cost control, other options available to us to improve our 
liquidity include the execution of forward sales in Ukraine and 
deferring capital expenditure if required. We are not burdened 
by significant field development commitments in the short or 
long term.

We continue to maintain provisions in respect of 2010 and 2015 
rental fee claims ($15.9m and $25.4m respectively). While we still 
wait for 2010 case resolution, there has been progress with some 
of the 2015 cases with four having been closed in our favour. The 
provision has been adjusted accordingly with a $14.4m release 
offsetting the increase in provision due to interest calculation 
(see Note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for detail). 
The Group’s expectation is that a final hearing with respect to 
the 2010 rental fee claim will take place in 2020 and the full 
provision for it has therefore been reported under current 
liabilities. It is expected that the final hearings in respect of the 
remaining 2015 rental fee claims will take place in 2021. The 
$25.4m provision for the 2015 rental fee claims therefore has 
been reported under non-current liabilities. 

The international arbitration award, directing the State of 
Ukraine to pay $11.8m plus interest and $0.3m costs to JKX as 
described in the 2018 Annual Report, has now been successfully 
legally recognised in Ukraine and JKX has filed for collection. 

No possible future benefit that may result from this award will 
be reflected in the accounts until there is further clarity on the 
process for, and likely success of, enforcing collection.

Both our Ukrainian and Russian operations remain cash flow 
positive, generating sufficient cash to cover the Group’s costs 
and investment programmes and, provided we do not encounter 
extended periods of severe operational disruption as a result of 
Covid-19, the Group's cash flows are forecast to be sufficient to 
meet potential rental fees should they arise without the need to 
access the conditional Tascom facilities or pursue other options 
to maintain liquidity.  Thanks to the successful completion of its 
workover programme in 2019, our Russian subsidiary is now well 
placed to contribute increased cash flows to Group.

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on 
a going concern basis (see Note 2 to the consolidated financial 
statements) which highlights a material uncertainty over going 
concern as a result of Covid-19. However, whilst the impact of 
the pandemic is uncertain, as it is for almost every business, for 
the first time in several years the group has a suitably stable 
financial position from which to better manage challenges that 
may arise and also then take advantage of opportunities in our 
key markets.

Ben Fraser  
Chief Financial Officer 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  201925

STRATEGIC REPORT

Corporate social responsibility (‘CSR’) review 

Health and safety performance 

This industry best practice makes sure: 

•  health, safety and environment issues are clearly identified 

and assessed; 

• 

• 

• 

• 

• 

regulatory and JKX requirements are met;

risks have been removed or mitigated according to a 
structured, systematic process, with any remaining risks 
demonstrated to be both tolerable and as low as reasonably 
practicable;

critical safety items and procedures are identified to manage 
remaining risks;

a comprehensive environmental management plan has been 
developed;

social, health, and environmental benefits and opportunities 
are identified; 

• 

personnel roles and responsibilities are indicated.

We have a manager based in our London office that is responsible 
for the planning, reviewing and authorising of Group drilling 
and workover operations which significantly strengthens our 
capability to identify and manage drilling risk.

Health and safety risk management 
We apply ISO 45001 (The Standard Replacing OHSAS 18001) 
ISO 14001 Environmental and ISO 9001 Quality Management 
standards. 

Consistent hazard assessment processes 
In both Russia and Ukraine, we continued to carry out risk 
management studies using our proven Hazard and Operability 
(‘HAZOP’), Hazard Identification (‘HAZID’) and As Low as 
Reasonably Practical (‘ALARP’) methodologies.

Health and safety training 
Each location has an H&S training budget which includes legally 
required training from the host country H&S regulations. 
Additional training is provided according to operational 
requirements.

Before reporting on  our health and safety performance  in 
2019 financial we take this opportunity to acknowledge the 
challenge of the global Covid-19 pandemic. The Group has 
already implemented a range of pre-emptive measures, further 
discussed in the risk section of this report, in recognition of 
the fact that our people remain our greatest asset and their 
continuing health our priority. We recognise the steps that are 
being taken by all our staff, contractors and suppliers to keep 
their colleagues and communities safe and the business running 
despite the challenges they are facing. 

Our approach  
By integrating health, safety and environmental considerations 
into all aspects of our business, we protect our employees, our 
communities and the environment. We will never knowingly 
compromise our health, safety, environmental or quality 
standards to meet our operational objectives. Our priority is to 
ensure that all staff and contractors work in a safe environment, 
where effective systems of work are maintained and appropriate 
procedures and processes are followed. We set annual HSECQ 
targets for all levels within the organisation.

Our performance in 2019 
We have a clear Safety Management System, which provides 
a comprehensive and systematic vision of our objectives. In 
occupational health, the drug and alcohol policy continues to be 
successful throughout the Group with no instances of breaches 
noted. The policy applies to all our staff and contractors 
and forbids the possession and/or use of defined prohibited 
substances which includes drugs and alcohol. Our policy also 
clarifies our testing and inspection procedures.

During 2019 we achieved an AIFR Zero (0) per 200,000 hours 
worked. In 2019 we reported 68  incidents, which demonstrates 
further consolidation in our incident reporting procedures.

Drilling risks  
We recognise that the safety and efficiency of our drilling and 
workover operations depends primarily on the performance of 
our employees and contractors. We utilise a mix of primarily 
local staff with decades of local experience and expatriate 
supervisors on our drilling rigs to provide additional expertise 
and oversight.

Our drilling and workover employees and contractors have 
the necessary training in well safety and well control, and all 
personnel have the authority (and are expected) to stop any job 
they deem unsafe.

We select supervisors for their expertise as well as for their 
familiarity with the regions where we operate. They understand, 
and are sensitive to local working practices and culture, and 
work to enhance the education and training of local staff and 
contractors alike.

We make the best use of our resources by sharing expertise 
between our operating companies, and we have a strong 
collaborative environment where everybody contributes to 
analyse the risks and develop mitigating strategies in order to 
minimise it.

Before we even begin to drill or workover a well, we identify and 
address the inherent risks in drilling and workover operations.

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  201926

STRATEGIC REPORT

Corporate social responsibility (‘CSR’) review 

Health and safety statistics

All Injury Frequency Rate 2019 (‘AIFR’)

5

4

3

2

1

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

0

HSECQ Statistical Analysis for 2019 

Fatal accident case

Lost time injuries

Medical treatment/restricted work cases

Near miss/loss/hazards/property damage/
unsafe act or conditions

2019 JKX and contractors

Days away from work

Fatal accident cases

Lost time injury cases

Medical treatment/restricted 
work cases

Near miss/loss/hazards/property 
damage/unsafe act or conditions

Environmental incidents

Man-hours since last lost 
time injury

0

0

0

68

0

0

0

0

68

1

Safety exposure man-hours

2,734,193

Fatal accident case frequency rate

Lost time injuries frequency rate

Medical treatment/restricted work cases 
frequency rate

Near miss/loss/hazards/property damage/
unsafe act or conditions frequency

Environmental incidents frequency rate

0

0

0

4.97

0.07

7,553,810

Man-hours since last fatal accident case

2,873,164

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  201927

Environmental management system

The JKX Environmental Management System is a comprehensive, 
systematic, planned an documented management process. 

Our impact 
We comply with all relevant environmental requirements, 
including environmental laws and regulations and industry 
guidelines. 

Environmental performance in 2019 
In 2019, we again made good progress and we are committed 
to providing information to investors about its environmental 
performance. 

Environmental incident frequency rate (‘EIFR’)  
Our EIFR Target for 2019 was not to exceed 0.6 Environmental 
incidents per 200,000 hours worked; we achieved 0.07. 

Greenhouse gas (‘GHG’) emissions reporting  
All emissions sources owned, operated or controlled by the Group 
are included in our reporting.

Our approach 
Our terminals are self-sufficient and can maintain operations 
without the need for grid electricity therefore improving 
the security of supply. We used the Greenhouse Gas Protocol 
methodology for compiling our GHG data.

Mandatory GHG reporting  
JKX is required to comply with the UK government legislation on 
mandatory GHG reporting. The legislation requires all companies 
as a minimum, to report Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions and an 
emission intensity ratio. According to the GHG Protocol Scope 2 
Guidance released in January 2015, corporates now are to report 
two scope 2 emission totals – location-based and market-based.

Since market-based emission factors are not available to 
any of JKX’s Russia and Ukraine locations, residual emission 
factors are only adopted for offices in the UK, and average grid 
emission factors are adopted for locations in Russia and Ukraine. 
Calculations shall be updated upon the Government release of 
residual factors for public use. JKX’s disclosure is in accordance 
with this legislation and the latest GHG protocol requirements.

Supply chain management 
At the heart of our sustainable supply chain is a policy of localising 
supply by fabricating, manufacturing and sourcing as much as 
possible as close to the point of use by using indigenous companies.

Our achievements 
During 2019 some advances were made in our Supply Chain 
Initiative, and this will continue in 2020 with a more focused 
approach to procurement and supply.

Outlook 
Plans to improve these procedures during 2020 include enhancing 
our JKX Code of Conduct.

Environmental Incident Frequency Rate (‘EIFR’)

0.8

0.7

0.6

0.5

0.4

0.3

0.2

0.1

2009

2010

2011

2012 2013 2014

2015 2016 2017 2018

2019

0.07

Mandatory GHG reporting

Data point

Scope 1 

Scope 2  
(Location based )

Scope 2  
(Market based )

Units

tonnes CO2e 

tonnes CO2e

tonnes CO2e

Scope 1 & 2  Intensity  
(Location based )

tonnes CO2e /Mboe 
of production

Quantity 
2019

281,590 

960

975

124

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  201928

STRATEGIC REPORT

Corporate social responsibility (‘CSR’) review 

Community
Our approach
We are committed to engaging with the community to share the 
benefits of our success at our operating plants.

Our community engagement  
We conduct various activities to forge good relations with local 
communities through participation in forums established by 
local authorities and residents' associations.

Assistance in our local communities 
In practical terms, our community support frequently involves 
using the Company’s plant and machinery – as well as manpower 
– to provide much-needed assistance.

Charitable donations and volunteering 
Each operation has a limited budget for good causes and we 
handle charitable donations at a local level. Locally, donations 
from the Group during 2019 amounted to $279,000 across the 
group. Subject to management approval, staff may be given 
additional time off in order to join in certain charity-related 
activities. A detailed list of donations is available on request. 

Quality

Applying ISO 9001 requirements ensures that the quality 
management systems that JKX has adopted work to improve the 
efficiency of the business. The new versions of ISO 9001 as well as 
OHSAS 18001 & ISO 14001 have been applied.

Diversity and equality

Access to work opportunities is based on merit, equality, fairness 
and need, and no one is treated less favourably on the basis of 
their sex, racial or ethnic origin, colour, religion, disability, 
marital status, sexuality or age. We will not tolerate any form of 
discrimination – either direct or indirect. Acts of discrimination, 
prejudice, harassment and victimisation which occur within the 
workplace or within the communities in which we work is not 
tolerated.

Our stakeholder engagement

We work closely with outside interest groups and maintain an 
open-door policy to better understand local issues and ensure 
problems are avoided. 

Our investor engagement
We seek to enhance shareholder value through responsible and 
effective communication with our shareholders.

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  2019 
 
29

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  201930

STRATEGIC REPORT

Principal risks and how we manage them

Our framework of internal controls is 
supported by a culture that promotes good risk 
management processes led by the Board.  

Responsibilities  
The Board is responsible for the Group’s continuous system of 
internal control and risk management systems and for reviewing 
their effectiveness. 

Risk profile

The chart below represents our current assessment of the potential impact 
and probability of occurrence of each of the principal risks noted below.

A

D

G

E

B

C

I

AA

D

G

F

H

H

Probability of occurrence

Higher

Risk management process  
The risk management process is designed to manage, rather than 
eliminate, the risk of failure to achieve business objectives, and 
can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance against 
material mis-statement or loss. 

Higher

t
c
a
p
m

i

l
a
i
t
n
e
t
o
P

Lower

2020

2019

A risk management process involves the Group Risk Committee 
and subsidiary Risk Committees in Ukraine and Russia. All the 
Risk Committees were in place throughout 2019, with the last 
Group Risk Committee being in December 2019.  

Risk Committee  
The purpose of the Group Risk Committee is to assist the Board 
in the operation and implementation of the risk management 
process, and to provide a source of assurance to the Audit 
Committee that the process is operating effectively. This 
approach aims to actively manage risk in a transparent and 
accountable way.

The Risk Committee reports to the Audit Committee. 
Composition of the Group Risk Committee includes 
representatives from our Ukrainian and Russian Risk 
Committees to expand on the risks identified locally and their 
related mitigation plans.

Risk management framework 
The key elements of the risk management process are as follows:

Risk identification - risks faced by the Group are identified by 
senior management and risk owners, who periodically review the 
risks to ensure that the risk management processes and controls 
in their area are appropriate and effective, and that new risks are 
identified.

Risk assessment - the consequence and likelihood of each risk 
materialising is assessed. Risk registers are used to document 
the risks identified, the level of severity of its impact, and 
probability of occurrence, ownership and mitigation measures 
for each risk. 

The Board has completed a robust assessment of the most 
significant risks and uncertainties which could impact the 
business model, long-term performance, solvency or liquidity, 
and the results are summarised below. Also presented is an 
assessment of the probability of each risk occurring, its potential 
impact should it occur, the Key Performance Indicators (‘KPIs’) 
and strategic priorities most affected as each risk increases, how 
each risk is being managed or mitigated and whether the overall 
business risk has increased or decreased since the last Annual 
Report.

The principal risks set out (right) are not set out in any order of 
priority, are likely to change and do not comprise all the risks and 
uncertainties that the Group faces.  

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  2019 
31

Risk summary

Risk profile

What is the risk

KPIs affected

Change from 2018

A
A

B
B

C
C

D
D

E
E

F
F

G
G

H
H

I

Liquidity, funding,  
and portfolio  
management

Geopolitical and 
fiscal

Reservoir and  
operational  
performance

- Operating cash flow 

- Liquidity

- Operating cash flow 

- Production

- Liquidity

- Production 

I

- Cash from operations 

I

- EBITDA per boe

Financial discipline 
and governance

- Liquidity

- Cash from operations

Health, safety,  
and environment

Asset integrity 

- AIPR 

- LTI 

- EIFR

- Production 

- Liquidity

I

I

Major breach of business, 
ethical, or compliance 
standards

- Cash from operations 

- Liquidity

Commodity prices  
and FX fluctuations

- Liquidity 

- EBITDA per boe

Global Covid-19  
pandemic

- Operating cash flow 

- Production

- Liquidity

Strategic objective 
impacted

Responsibility

1, 2 

CFO

Page

32

1, 2

1, 2

1

3

3

3

1, 2

1, 2

The Board

32

General Directors

34

CFO

The Board

34

34

General Directors

34

The Board

CFO

The Board

36

36

36

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  201932

STRATEGIC REPORT

Principal risks and how we manage them

What is the risk 

Liquidity, funding, and portfolio management

Description: As for any other exploration and production company, our fields are prone to natural 
production decline. Our ability to ensure long-term sustainable production depends on having sufficient 
funds to invest in our development and efficient allocation of capital on investment projects or 
acquisitions.

It is important to maintain sufficient liquidity to allow for operational, technical, commercial, legal, and 
other contingencies.

Having sufficient funds to invest in development projects or other growth opportunities is subject to not 
only cash flow generated by existing operations, but also access to external capital (such as equity or debt 
financing) or ability to carry out corporate transactions (such as mergers, acquisitions, or divestitures).

Impact: Inability to build or maintain sufficient liquidity may result in increased risk of having 
insufficient funds on hand to address unanticipated cash outflows, need to suspend planned payments to 
third parties, or other unplanned actions to urgently build sufficient liquidity.

Poor capital allocation decisions, inability to access external sources of capital or execute corporate 
transactions may result in long-term decline in production and cash flow from existing operations and 
further reduced ability to engage in new development projects.

Although the group has been debt free since February 2020 this risk remains.

Geopolitical and fiscal

Description: The Group’s oil and gas operations are located in Ukraine and Russia and the oil, gas and 
condensate that we produce is sold into their domestic markets.

There are geopolitical risks related to these countries and the relationship between them.

Some of such risks may be related to changes in taxes, capital controls, laws and regulations, political 
situation, or investor sentiment.

Both countries have relatively weak judicial systems that are susceptible to outside influence, and it can 
take an extended period for the courts to reach final judgment.

Both countries display emerging market characteristics where the right to production can be challenged 
by State and non-State parties. The business environment is such that a challenge may arise at any time 
in relation to the Group’s operations, licence history, compliance with licence commitments and/or local 
regulations.

Local legislation constantly evolves as the governments attempt to manage the economies and business 
practices regarding taxation, banking operations and foreign currency transactions. The constantly 
evolving legislation can create uncertainty for local operations if guidance or interpretation is not clear.

Geopolitical tensions between Ukraine and Russia, political instability and military action in parts 
of Ukraine have negatively impacted its economy, financial markets and relations with the Russian 
Federation. Any continuing or escalating military action in eastern Ukraine could have a further adverse 
effect on the economy.

Impact: If Management’s interpretation of tax legislation does not align with that of the tax authorities, 
the tax authorities may challenge transactions which could result in additional taxes, penalties and fines 
which could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s financial position and results of operations.

PPC has at times sought clarification of their status regarding a number of rental fees. PPC continues 
to defend itself in court against action initiated by the tax authorities regarding rental fees for August 
to December 2010 and for January to December 2015. In addition, in February 2017, the Company 
was awarded approximately $11.8m in damages plus interest and costs of $0.3m by an international 
arbitration tribunal pursuant to a claim made against Ukraine under the Energy Charter Treaty. This 
award has been recognised in Ukraine and the Group is following procedures for its collection.

Probability  

Impact

Change from  
2019

Responsibility

How do we manage it?

Further information

MED

HIGH

CFO

Liquidity is accumulated by deferring high-risk investment projects and minimizing costs. Projects are 

Chairman’s statement 

analysed and ranked across the Group and capital is allocated accordingly. All significant investment 

page 4

decisions are subject to Board approval and taken with due consideration to funding availability. These 

decisions are taken within the context of the longer term field development plans.

Financial review 

page 22

In addition in December 2019 PPC, our subsidiary in Ukraine, has renewed a 24 month UAH280m 

($11.8m) revolving credit line and a UAH50m ($2.1m) overdraft facility with Tascombank, neither of 

which are currently being used. We are confident that this facility can be renewed again for 2022. Other 

liquidity tools include the ability to make forward sales in Ukraine.

Four of the 2015 rental fee cases have been closed in PPC’s favour. Furthermore we have improved our 

understanding of the 2010 and the remaining 2015 rental fee claims and ensured that we have the 

resources to meet these potential liabilities if necessary. In particular, careful consideration has been 

given to the earliest dates that courts may conclude that PPC may be required to settle any or all of the 

various claims in the event that court hearings proceed without undue delay. The Group's expectation 

is that a final hearing with respect to the 2010 rental fee claim will take place in 2021 and that final 

hearings in respect of the remaining active 2015 rental fee claims will take place in 2021.

HIGH

HIGH

I

challenges from local authorities, which could lead to remediation work, time-consuming negotiations 

page 4

The Board

The Group’s operations and financial position may be adversely affected by interruption, inspections and 

Chairman’s statement 

and suspension of production licences.

In respect of the 2010 rental fee claims and 2015 rental fee claims, provisions of $15.9m and $25.4m 

respectively, have been recognised in these financial statements to reflect the Company’s estimate of the 

potential liability. Except for this $41.3m provision, the Group’s financial statements do not include any 

other adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability, and classification of assets 

or the amounts or classifications of liabilities that may result from these tax uncertainties.

The Company continues to work through the proper processes for enforcement of collection of the 

international arbitration award. A key priority for the Group is to maintain transparent working 

relationships with all key stakeholders in our significant assets in Ukraine and Russia and to improve the 

methods of regular dialogue and on-going communications locally.

Our strategy is to employ skilled local staff working in the countries of operation and to engage 

established legal, tax and accounting advisers to assist in compliance, when necessary. The Group 

endeavours to comply with all regulations via Group procedures and controls or, where this is not 

immediately feasible for practical or logistical considerations, seeks to enter into dialogue with the 

relevant Government bodies.

Financial review 

page 22

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  201933

What is the risk 

Probability  

Impact

Change from  

Responsibility

How do we manage it?

Further information

2019

Liquidity, funding, and portfolio management

Description: As for any other exploration and production company, our fields are prone to natural 

production decline. Our ability to ensure long-term sustainable production depends on having sufficient 

funds to invest in our development and efficient allocation of capital on investment projects or 

It is important to maintain sufficient liquidity to allow for operational, technical, commercial, legal, and 

acquisitions.

other contingencies.

Having sufficient funds to invest in development projects or other growth opportunities is subject to not 

only cash flow generated by existing operations, but also access to external capital (such as equity or debt 

financing) or ability to carry out corporate transactions (such as mergers, acquisitions, or divestitures).

Impact: Inability to build or maintain sufficient liquidity may result in increased risk of having 

insufficient funds on hand to address unanticipated cash outflows, need to suspend planned payments to 

third parties, or other unplanned actions to urgently build sufficient liquidity.

Poor capital allocation decisions, inability to access external sources of capital or execute corporate 

transactions may result in long-term decline in production and cash flow from existing operations and 

further reduced ability to engage in new development projects.

Although the group has been debt free since February 2020 this risk remains.

Geopolitical and fiscal

Description: The Group’s oil and gas operations are located in Ukraine and Russia and the oil, gas and 

condensate that we produce is sold into their domestic markets.

There are geopolitical risks related to these countries and the relationship between them.

Some of such risks may be related to changes in taxes, capital controls, laws and regulations, political 

situation, or investor sentiment.

Both countries have relatively weak judicial systems that are susceptible to outside influence, and it can 

take an extended period for the courts to reach final judgment.

Both countries display emerging market characteristics where the right to production can be challenged 

by State and non-State parties. The business environment is such that a challenge may arise at any time 

in relation to the Group’s operations, licence history, compliance with licence commitments and/or local 

regulations.

Local legislation constantly evolves as the governments attempt to manage the economies and business 

practices regarding taxation, banking operations and foreign currency transactions. The constantly 

evolving legislation can create uncertainty for local operations if guidance or interpretation is not clear.

Geopolitical tensions between Ukraine and Russia, political instability and military action in parts 

of Ukraine have negatively impacted its economy, financial markets and relations with the Russian 

Federation. Any continuing or escalating military action in eastern Ukraine could have a further adverse 

effect on the economy.

Impact: If Management’s interpretation of tax legislation does not align with that of the tax authorities, 

the tax authorities may challenge transactions which could result in additional taxes, penalties and fines 

which could have a material adverse effect on the Group’s financial position and results of operations.

PPC has at times sought clarification of their status regarding a number of rental fees. PPC continues 

to defend itself in court against action initiated by the tax authorities regarding rental fees for August 

to December 2010 and for January to December 2015. In addition, in February 2017, the Company 

was awarded approximately $11.8m in damages plus interest and costs of $0.3m by an international 

arbitration tribunal pursuant to a claim made against Ukraine under the Energy Charter Treaty. This 

award has been recognised in Ukraine and the Group is following procedures for its collection.

CFO

Liquidity is accumulated by deferring high-risk investment projects and minimizing costs. Projects are 
analysed and ranked across the Group and capital is allocated accordingly. All significant investment 
decisions are subject to Board approval and taken with due consideration to funding availability. These 
decisions are taken within the context of the longer term field development plans.

In addition in December 2019 PPC, our subsidiary in Ukraine, has renewed a 24 month UAH280m 
($11.8m) revolving credit line and a UAH50m ($2.1m) overdraft facility with Tascombank, neither of 
which are currently being used. We are confident that this facility can be renewed again for 2022. Other 
liquidity tools include the ability to make forward sales in Ukraine.

Four of the 2015 rental fee cases have been closed in PPC’s favour. Furthermore we have improved our 
understanding of the 2010 and the remaining 2015 rental fee claims and ensured that we have the 
resources to meet these potential liabilities if necessary. In particular, careful consideration has been 
given to the earliest dates that courts may conclude that PPC may be required to settle any or all of the 
various claims in the event that court hearings proceed without undue delay. The Group's expectation 
is that a final hearing with respect to the 2010 rental fee claim will take place in 2021 and that final 
hearings in respect of the remaining active 2015 rental fee claims will take place in 2021.

Chairman’s statement 
page 4

Financial review 
page 22

The Board

The Group’s operations and financial position may be adversely affected by interruption, inspections and 
challenges from local authorities, which could lead to remediation work, time-consuming negotiations 
and suspension of production licences.

Chairman’s statement 
page 4

In respect of the 2010 rental fee claims and 2015 rental fee claims, provisions of $15.9m and $25.4m 
respectively, have been recognised in these financial statements to reflect the Company’s estimate of the 
potential liability. Except for this $41.3m provision, the Group’s financial statements do not include any 
other adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability, and classification of assets 
or the amounts or classifications of liabilities that may result from these tax uncertainties.

The Company continues to work through the proper processes for enforcement of collection of the 
international arbitration award. A key priority for the Group is to maintain transparent working 
relationships with all key stakeholders in our significant assets in Ukraine and Russia and to improve the 
methods of regular dialogue and on-going communications locally.

Our strategy is to employ skilled local staff working in the countries of operation and to engage 
established legal, tax and accounting advisers to assist in compliance, when necessary. The Group 
endeavours to comply with all regulations via Group procedures and controls or, where this is not 
immediately feasible for practical or logistical considerations, seeks to enter into dialogue with the 
relevant Government bodies.

Financial review 
page 22

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  201934

STRATEGIC REPORT

Principal risks and how we manage them

What is the risk 

Reservoir and operational performance

Description: Subsurface and operational risks are inherent to our business. The reservoir performance 
cannot be predicted with certainty, and operations required for hydrocarbon production are subject to 
risks of interruption or failure.

Production from our mature fields at the Novomykolaivske Complex in Ukraine require a high level of 
maintenance and intervention to minimize the production decline. In Russia, acidization of deep, high 
pressure and high temperature wells and other well maintenance procedures to stabilise production are 
required, increasing risk of failure.

Impact: Accurate reservoir performance forecasts from fields in Ukraine and Russia are critical in 
achieving the desired economic returns and to determine the availability and allocation of funds for 
future investment into the exploration for, or development of, other oil and gas reserves and resources.

If reservoir performance is lower than forecast, sufficient finance may not be available for planned 
investment in other development projects which will result in lower production, profits and cash flows.

Inability to ensure continuous operation of wells, flowlines, production facilities and successful execution 
of drilling, workover, repair, enhancement interventions may result in lower production, profits and cash 
flows.

Financial discipline and governance

Description: The Group has presence in four countries with major operations in Russia, Ukraine, and the 
United Kingdom. Such complex structure requires complex governance and control procedures to be in 
place to ensure appropriate level of financial discipline and controls, as well as delegation of authority 
along the corporate and management structure.

From 2015 to 2019 the Group underwent several major Board and management changes, changes of 
advisors and contractors, as well as significant reduction of staff across its operations. These changes 
require additional efforts to ensure proper implementation of governance, controls, and financial 
discipline procedures.

Impact: Failure to maintain an appropriate level of financial discipline, governance and controls may 
lead to unnecessary or inappropriate spending, lack of control over procurement, contracting, investing 
decisions, and exposure to increased legal, regulatory, or financial risks.

Health, safety, and environmental risks

Description: We are exposed to a wide range of significant health, safety, security and environmental 
risks influenced by the geographic range, operational diversity and technical complexity of our oil and gas 
exploration and production activities.

The Group has not assessed Climate Change as being a significant risk to its business in the foreseeable 
future. We monitor supply and demand forecasts for our products from a variety of sources and Climate 
Change does not appear as a major cited factor. If political responses to Climate Change actually lead to 
major reductions in coal – fired European electricity generation, the Group may benefit from substitution 
by cleaner gas – fired plant.

Impact: Technical failure, non-compliance with existing standards and procedures, accidents, natural 
disasters and other adverse conditions where we operate, could lead to injury, loss of life, damage to the 
environment, loss of containment of hydrocarbons and other hazardous material, as well as the risk of 
fires and explosions. Failure to manage these risks effectively could result in loss of certain facilities, 
with the associated loss of production, or costs associated with mitigation, recovery, compensation and 
fines. Poor performance in mitigating these risks could also result in damaging publicity for the Group.

Asset integrity

Probability  

Impact

Change from  
2019

Responsibility

How do we manage it?

Further information

HIGH

HIGH

I

data is analysed by our in-house technical expertise. This supports well intervention planning and further 

page 16

There is daily monitoring and reporting of the well and plant performance at all our fields. Production 

Operations review 

General 

Directors

field development.

Our subsurface and operations specialists and industry-recognised personnel are part of the daily 

monitoring and reservoir management process of our field and assets.

Production forecasts generated for future development opportunities are risked to take account of 

geological uncertainty. Operational risks are taken account of by adding a percentage of contingency to 

the duration and cost of the planned development action. The percentage of contingency added is based 

on both historical experience and perceived difficulty of the development action.

MED

HIGH

including through more frequent and detailed management reporting to the Board of Directors.

page 4

CFO

During 2018 new financial controls were implemented and corporate governance was enhanced, 

Chairman’s statement 

A Group Policy Manual has been implemented across the group. It is subject to annual review and revision 

by the Board to ensure that governance and control procedures are sufficient to insure the appropriate 

level of financial discipline and controls, as well as delegation of authority along the corporate and 

Financial review 

page 22

management structure. 

HIGH

HIGH

I

General 

Directors

Health, safety and the environment is a priority of the Board who are involved in the planning and 

Corporate social 

implementation of continuous improvement initiatives. A London-based HSECQ Manager reports directly 

responsibility 

to Board of Directors.

page 25

The Group HSECQ Manager is responsible for maintaining a strong culture of health, safety and 

environmental awareness in all our operational and business activities. The HSECQ Manager reports to 

the Board with details of Group performance.

Operations in Ukraine, Russia and Hungary all have a dedicated HSECQ Team of local personnel led by an 

HSECQ Manager who reports to the HSECQ Director for that particular region.

All locations have HSE Management Systems modelled on the ISO 9000 series, OHSAS 18001 and ISO 

14001.

Appropriate insurance policies, provided by reputable insurers, are maintained at Group level to mitigate 

the Group’s financial exposure to any unexpected adverse events arising out of the normal operations.

Description: Our operations depend on maintaining and adhering to licence requirements and related 
regulations set by government authorities in countries we operate in.

Impact: Failure to comply with licence obligations and other regulations or requirements may result in 
our licences being suspended or revoked which will require us to suspend production and operations.

MED

HIGH

I

General 

Directors

Status of our licences and relevant licence obligations are monitored on a country level.

In 2018 the deadline for the Callovian well drilling commitment in Russia, which is the Group’s largest 

single commitment, was extended until 2025.

Corporate social 

responsibility 

page 25

Corporate  governance 

page 40

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  2019 
35

What is the risk 

Probability  

Impact

Change from  

Responsibility

How do we manage it?

Further information

2019

Reservoir and operational performance

Description: Subsurface and operational risks are inherent to our business. The reservoir performance 

cannot be predicted with certainty, and operations required for hydrocarbon production are subject to 

risks of interruption or failure.

Production from our mature fields at the Novomykolaivske Complex in Ukraine require a high level of 

maintenance and intervention to minimize the production decline. In Russia, acidization of deep, high 

pressure and high temperature wells and other well maintenance procedures to stabilise production are 

required, increasing risk of failure.

Impact: Accurate reservoir performance forecasts from fields in Ukraine and Russia are critical in 

achieving the desired economic returns and to determine the availability and allocation of funds for 

future investment into the exploration for, or development of, other oil and gas reserves and resources.

If reservoir performance is lower than forecast, sufficient finance may not be available for planned 

investment in other development projects which will result in lower production, profits and cash flows.

Inability to ensure continuous operation of wells, flowlines, production facilities and successful execution 

of drilling, workover, repair, enhancement interventions may result in lower production, profits and cash 

flows.

Financial discipline and governance

Description: The Group has presence in four countries with major operations in Russia, Ukraine, and the 

United Kingdom. Such complex structure requires complex governance and control procedures to be in 

place to ensure appropriate level of financial discipline and controls, as well as delegation of authority 

along the corporate and management structure.

From 2015 to 2019 the Group underwent several major Board and management changes, changes of 

advisors and contractors, as well as significant reduction of staff across its operations. These changes 

require additional efforts to ensure proper implementation of governance, controls, and financial 

discipline procedures.

Impact: Failure to maintain an appropriate level of financial discipline, governance and controls may 

lead to unnecessary or inappropriate spending, lack of control over procurement, contracting, investing 

decisions, and exposure to increased legal, regulatory, or financial risks.

Health, safety, and environmental risks

Description: We are exposed to a wide range of significant health, safety, security and environmental 

risks influenced by the geographic range, operational diversity and technical complexity of our oil and gas 

exploration and production activities.

The Group has not assessed Climate Change as being a significant risk to its business in the foreseeable 

future. We monitor supply and demand forecasts for our products from a variety of sources and Climate 

Change does not appear as a major cited factor. If political responses to Climate Change actually lead to 

major reductions in coal – fired European electricity generation, the Group may benefit from substitution 

by cleaner gas – fired plant.

Impact: Technical failure, non-compliance with existing standards and procedures, accidents, natural 

disasters and other adverse conditions where we operate, could lead to injury, loss of life, damage to the 

environment, loss of containment of hydrocarbons and other hazardous material, as well as the risk of 

fires and explosions. Failure to manage these risks effectively could result in loss of certain facilities, 

with the associated loss of production, or costs associated with mitigation, recovery, compensation and 

fines. Poor performance in mitigating these risks could also result in damaging publicity for the Group.

Asset integrity

Description: Our operations depend on maintaining and adhering to licence requirements and related 

regulations set by government authorities in countries we operate in.

Impact: Failure to comply with licence obligations and other regulations or requirements may result in 

our licences being suspended or revoked which will require us to suspend production and operations.

General 
Directors

There is daily monitoring and reporting of the well and plant performance at all our fields. Production 
data is analysed by our in-house technical expertise. This supports well intervention planning and further 
field development.

Operations review 
page 16

Our subsurface and operations specialists and industry-recognised personnel are part of the daily 
monitoring and reservoir management process of our field and assets.

Production forecasts generated for future development opportunities are risked to take account of 
geological uncertainty. Operational risks are taken account of by adding a percentage of contingency to 
the duration and cost of the planned development action. The percentage of contingency added is based 
on both historical experience and perceived difficulty of the development action.

CFO

During 2018 new financial controls were implemented and corporate governance was enhanced, 
including through more frequent and detailed management reporting to the Board of Directors.

Chairman’s statement 
page 4

A Group Policy Manual has been implemented across the group. It is subject to annual review and revision 
by the Board to ensure that governance and control procedures are sufficient to insure the appropriate 
level of financial discipline and controls, as well as delegation of authority along the corporate and 
management structure. 

Financial review 
page 22

General 
Directors

Health, safety and the environment is a priority of the Board who are involved in the planning and 
implementation of continuous improvement initiatives. A London-based HSECQ Manager reports directly 
to Board of Directors.

Corporate social 
responsibility 
page 25

The Group HSECQ Manager is responsible for maintaining a strong culture of health, safety and 
environmental awareness in all our operational and business activities. The HSECQ Manager reports to 
the Board with details of Group performance.

Operations in Ukraine, Russia and Hungary all have a dedicated HSECQ Team of local personnel led by an 
HSECQ Manager who reports to the HSECQ Director for that particular region.

All locations have HSE Management Systems modelled on the ISO 9000 series, OHSAS 18001 and ISO 
14001.

Appropriate insurance policies, provided by reputable insurers, are maintained at Group level to mitigate 
the Group’s financial exposure to any unexpected adverse events arising out of the normal operations.

General 
Directors

Status of our licences and relevant licence obligations are monitored on a country level.

In 2018 the deadline for the Callovian well drilling commitment in Russia, which is the Group’s largest 
single commitment, was extended until 2025.

Corporate social 
responsibility 
page 25

Corporate  governance 
page 40

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  2019 
36

STRATEGIC REPORT

Principal risks and how we manage them

What is the risk 

Probability  

Impact

Change from  
2019

Responsibility

How do we manage it?

Further information

Major breach of business, ethical, or compliance standards

Description: The Company is subject to numerous requirements and standards including UK Bribery Act, 
UK Listing Rules, UK Corporate Governance Code, and the Disclosure and Transparency Rules, among 
others. Additionally, some of our stakeholders, such as financial institutions, may require us to comply 
with other requirements or ask us to provide information on our business, operations, employees and 
shareholders as part of Know Your Client (“KYC”) procedures.

Impact: Failing to comply with onerous regulations and requirements, such as failure to implement 
adequate systems to prevent bribery and corruption, could result in prosecution, fines or penalties 
imposed on the Company or its officers, suspension of operations or listing.

Inability to clear KYC procedures to satisfaction of the third parties may result in refusal to engage in 
business relationships with the Company.

MED

HIGH

The Board

The CFO is responsible for compliance and, with the support of the Board, implements compliance-related 

Corporate social 

Such activities focus on training, monitoring, risk management, due diligence and regular review of 

responsibility 

page 25

activities and procedures.

policies and procedures.

We prohibit bribery and corruption in any form by all employees and by those working for and/or 

Corporate  governance 

connected with the business. Employees are expected to report actual, attempted or suspected bribery 

page 40

or other issues related to compliance to their line managers or through our independently managed 

confidential reporting process, which is available to all staff as well as third parties.

In 2017 we engaged an independent consultant to assess our anti-bribery and corruption (“ABC”) policies, 

procedures, and practices and in 2018 we engaged KPMG to conduct a forensic review of procurement 

of legal services and subsequent payments made to legal advisors in Ukraine in 2017. Recommendations 

arising from both have been implemented to further strengthen our ABC framework. This included 

completion of a full Bribery Risk Assessment.

In dealing with the third parties, our policy is to maximize transparency and provide all information 

available to address KYC-related procedures and requests.

Commodity prices and FX fluctuations

Description: JKX is exposed to international oil and gas price movements, policy developments in Russia 
which may affect the regulated gas price, and movements in exchange rates. Such changes will have a 
direct effect on the Group’s trading results.

Gas prices in Ukraine are closely aligned with gas prices in Europe. Ukraine  does not currently purchase 
gas from Russia directly. Change in gas import flows may have impact on gas prices in Ukraine, and a 
prolonged period of low gas prices would impact the Group’s liquidity.

In Russia, from 1 July 2019 the regulated price to which our sales contract is tied has increased by 3.9% 
however, prevailing prices remain significantly lower than in Europe due to existing regulations.

In Ukraine PPC sells the oil it produces at prices determined by a combination of the global oil market and 
local market factors.

During 2019, both the Hryvnia and the Rouble strengthened moderately.

Impact: A period of low oil and/or gas prices could lead to impairments of the Group’s oil and gas assets 
and may impact the Group’s ability to support its field development plans and reduce shareholder returns.

Global Covid-19 pandemic. 

Description: The Group’s oil and gas operations are located in Ukraine and Russia with a head office 
located in the United Kingdom.  All locations are suffering from increasing levels of Covid-19 infection 
and in due course there may be increasing disruption of normal working patterns. The national and local 
governments in all locations are recommending or implementing increasingly severe restrictions in order 
to manage the situation. 

In view of the risk the Group’s primary objectives include:

i)     Protecting the health of the Group’s staff, contractors and suppliers and those in the  
        communities from which they are drawn;

ii)    Maintaining the Group’s operations and business more generally and ensure that high levels of 
         operational safety are maintained; and

iii)  Maximising sales prices in an unpredictable market.

Impact: Increasing levels of infection and restrictions on movement have the potential to negatively 
impact the Group and specifically the operating companies. These impacts may include a reduction in the 
number of staff fit to work, a reduced ability to conduct production operations, contractors and suppliers 
being unable to provide the necessary support, a reduction in demand and lower sales prices. If these 
risks crystallise there may be business constraint or interruption, reduced production, a fall in demand 
and reduced sales prices and a consequent reduction in the Group’s ability to commit to new capital 
expenditure.

HIGH

HIGH

foreign exchange risk.

CFO

JKX’s policy is not to hedge commodity price exposure on oil, gas, LPG or condensate and not to hedge 

Financial review 

JKX attempts to maximise its realisations versus relevant benchmarks while keeping credit risk to a 

minimum by selling mostly on spot markets and on a prepayment basis.

As commodity prices in Ukraine closely follow international benchmarks, significant changes in the 

Page 13

exchange rates are reflected in commodity prices providing a natural hedge.

In Russia, the vast majority of gas produced is sold to a single local gas trading company through a long 

term gas sales contract with prices set in Roubles. Sales price for gas is fixed and is subject to increase 

according to changes in a tariff set by relevant regulatory bodies. The Company continues to seek other 

sales opportunities in Russia to improve realisations.

The Group attempts to match, as far as practicable, receipts and payments in the same currency and also 

follow a range of commercial policies to minimise exposures to foreign exchange gains and losses.

page 22

Strategic report 

HIGH

HIGH

The Board

In order to manage this risk the Group (and in particular the 2 operating units, PPC and YGE) have 

Chairman’s statement 

undertaken a holistic review of the likely impact on their businesses and have implemented a range of 

page 4

b)  Introducing and enforcing social distancing and remote-working, cancellation of business trips  

statement 

Chief Executive's 

page 6

escalating and proportionate responses. These responses include:

a)  Undertaking awareness-raising in all locations; 

         and meetings and the use of remote working solutions;

c)  Enhanced cleaning regimes for certain Group facilities;

d)  Temperature screening of staff and contractors at entry points;

e)  Active liaison with local regional and national government;

f)  Securing normal business activities including oil and LPG loading, drilling and work over 

         activity;

g)  Taking steps to minimise exposure to further commodity price decrease; and

h)  Reducing costs to maintain Group liquidity.

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  2019 
37

What is the risk 

Probability  

Impact

Change from  

Responsibility

How do we manage it?

Further information

2019

Major breach of business, ethical, or compliance standards

Description: The Company is subject to numerous requirements and standards including UK Bribery Act, 

UK Listing Rules, UK Corporate Governance Code, and the Disclosure and Transparency Rules, among 

others. Additionally, some of our stakeholders, such as financial institutions, may require us to comply 

with other requirements or ask us to provide information on our business, operations, employees and 

shareholders as part of Know Your Client (“KYC”) procedures.

Impact: Failing to comply with onerous regulations and requirements, such as failure to implement 

adequate systems to prevent bribery and corruption, could result in prosecution, fines or penalties 

imposed on the Company or its officers, suspension of operations or listing.

Inability to clear KYC procedures to satisfaction of the third parties may result in refusal to engage in 

business relationships with the Company.

Commodity prices and FX fluctuations

Description: JKX is exposed to international oil and gas price movements, policy developments in Russia 

which may affect the regulated gas price, and movements in exchange rates. Such changes will have a 

direct effect on the Group’s trading results.

Gas prices in Ukraine are closely aligned with gas prices in Europe. Ukraine  does not currently purchase 

gas from Russia directly. Change in gas import flows may have impact on gas prices in Ukraine, and a 

prolonged period of low gas prices would impact the Group’s liquidity.

In Russia, from 1 July 2019 the regulated price to which our sales contract is tied has increased by 3.9% 

however, prevailing prices remain significantly lower than in Europe due to existing regulations.

In Ukraine PPC sells the oil it produces at prices determined by a combination of the global oil market and 

local market factors.

During 2019, both the Hryvnia and the Rouble strengthened moderately.

Impact: A period of low oil and/or gas prices could lead to impairments of the Group’s oil and gas assets 

and may impact the Group’s ability to support its field development plans and reduce shareholder returns.

Global Covid-19 pandemic. 

Description: The Group’s oil and gas operations are located in Ukraine and Russia with a head office 

located in the United Kingdom.  All locations are suffering from increasing levels of Covid-19 infection 

and in due course there may be increasing disruption of normal working patterns. The national and local 

governments in all locations are recommending or implementing increasingly severe restrictions in order 

to manage the situation. 

In view of the risk the Group’s primary objectives include:

i)     Protecting the health of the Group’s staff, contractors and suppliers and those in the  

        communities from which they are drawn;

ii)    Maintaining the Group’s operations and business more generally and ensure that high levels of 

         operational safety are maintained; and

iii)  Maximising sales prices in an unpredictable market.

Impact: Increasing levels of infection and restrictions on movement have the potential to negatively 

impact the Group and specifically the operating companies. These impacts may include a reduction in the 

number of staff fit to work, a reduced ability to conduct production operations, contractors and suppliers 

being unable to provide the necessary support, a reduction in demand and lower sales prices. If these 

risks crystallise there may be business constraint or interruption, reduced production, a fall in demand 

and reduced sales prices and a consequent reduction in the Group’s ability to commit to new capital 

expenditure.

The Board

The CFO is responsible for compliance and, with the support of the Board, implements compliance-related 
activities and procedures.

Such activities focus on training, monitoring, risk management, due diligence and regular review of 
policies and procedures.

We prohibit bribery and corruption in any form by all employees and by those working for and/or 
connected with the business. Employees are expected to report actual, attempted or suspected bribery 
or other issues related to compliance to their line managers or through our independently managed 
confidential reporting process, which is available to all staff as well as third parties.

In 2017 we engaged an independent consultant to assess our anti-bribery and corruption (“ABC”) policies, 
procedures, and practices and in 2018 we engaged KPMG to conduct a forensic review of procurement 
of legal services and subsequent payments made to legal advisors in Ukraine in 2017. Recommendations 
arising from both have been implemented to further strengthen our ABC framework. This included 
completion of a full Bribery Risk Assessment.

In dealing with the third parties, our policy is to maximize transparency and provide all information 
available to address KYC-related procedures and requests.

Corporate social 
responsibility 
page 25

Corporate  governance 
page 40

CFO

JKX’s policy is not to hedge commodity price exposure on oil, gas, LPG or condensate and not to hedge 
foreign exchange risk.

Financial review 
page 22

JKX attempts to maximise its realisations versus relevant benchmarks while keeping credit risk to a 
minimum by selling mostly on spot markets and on a prepayment basis.

As commodity prices in Ukraine closely follow international benchmarks, significant changes in the 
exchange rates are reflected in commodity prices providing a natural hedge.

Strategic report 
Page 13

In Russia, the vast majority of gas produced is sold to a single local gas trading company through a long 
term gas sales contract with prices set in Roubles. Sales price for gas is fixed and is subject to increase 
according to changes in a tariff set by relevant regulatory bodies. The Company continues to seek other 
sales opportunities in Russia to improve realisations.

The Group attempts to match, as far as practicable, receipts and payments in the same currency and also 
follow a range of commercial policies to minimise exposures to foreign exchange gains and losses.

The Board

In order to manage this risk the Group (and in particular the 2 operating units, PPC and YGE) have 
undertaken a holistic review of the likely impact on their businesses and have implemented a range of 
escalating and proportionate responses. These responses include:

Chairman’s statement 
page 4

a)  Undertaking awareness-raising in all locations; 

b)  Introducing and enforcing social distancing and remote-working, cancellation of business trips  
         and meetings and the use of remote working solutions;

Chief Executive's 
statement 
page 6

c)  Enhanced cleaning regimes for certain Group facilities;

d)  Temperature screening of staff and contractors at entry points;

e)  Active liaison with local regional and national government;

f)  Securing normal business activities including oil and LPG loading, drilling and work over 
         activity;

g)  Taking steps to minimise exposure to further commodity price decrease; and

h)  Reducing costs to maintain Group liquidity.

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  2019 
38

STRATEGIC REPORT

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  2018

Principal risks and how we manage them

Long term viability statement 
The Directors have assessed the viability of the Group over a three-
year period to 31 December 2022 taking account of the Group’s 
current position and the potential impact of the principal risks 
documented above.

Summary of the strategic review by country

• 

• 

• 

Ukraine In 2018 we developed a five year field development 
plan (medium term), that we are now executing. In addition,  
we systematically review opportunities for acquisition and 
new licensing in Ukraine.

Russia Operations, production and cash flow are stable in 
Russia, following completion of a workover programme  
in 2019. 

Hungary We are in the process of disposing of our six mining 
plots in Hungary. 

The Board believes that the Group’s assets and staff provide a good 
platform to consolidate and improve on its existing oil and gas 
opportunities.

The Group has been operating in Ukraine for over 25 years and 
in Russia for over 10 years. Most of the Group’s profits and cash 
flows continue to be generated in Ukraine and, to a lesser extent, 
in Russia. However there remain significant risks associated with 
operating in the emerging markets in general, and operating our 
assets specifically, which could adversely impact cash flows, profits 
and liquidity of the Group.

Assessment of viability
The Board closely monitors and manages its liquidity risk using 
cash flow forecasts which are regularly produced and applies 
sensitivities for different scenarios including, but not limited 
to, changes in oil and gas prices, changes in Rouble and Hryvnia 
exchange rates, various scenarios for reservoir performance, 
and delays to additional future revenue. These sensitivities are 
considered both individually and in unison.

The assessment incorporated the use of mitigating actions 
available to the business, such as a reduction in capital expenditure 
and use of external facilities.

Capital and operating costs were based on approved budgets and 
latest forecasts in the case of 2020 and current development plans 
in the case of 2021 through to December 2022. In addition, the 
Directors made enquiries into and considered the Ukrainian and 
Russian business environments and future expectations regarding 
country and currency risks that the Group may encounter, as 
disclosed in the risks above. In addition, the Board has considered 
potential reverse stress tests performed to assess the impact of 
Covid-19 including production stoppages combined with sustained 
lower commodity prices as detailed in note 2 to the financial 
statements.

Principal risks facing the Group
For the purposes of assessing the Group’s viability, the Directors 
focused on the following principal risks which are critical to the 
Group’s success but which are outside the control of management 
and could have a significant impact on the business:

•  Commodity prices and FX fluctuations  

The Group is exposed to international oil and gas price 
movements, policy developments in Russia which may affect 
the regulated gas price, and movements in exchange rates. Such 
changes will have a direct effect on the Group’s trading results. 

•  Potential rental  fee claims

The Company has persistently defended its position in the 
Ukrainian courts regarding the rental fee claims for 2010 

and 2015 totalling approximately $41.3 million (including 
interest and penalties, see Note 25 to the consolidated 
financial statements). The Company will continue to defend 
its position in the Ukrainian courts in all outstanding cases, 
the Directors have given careful consideration to the earliest 
dates that courts may conclude that any or all of the claims 
may be required to be settled and ensured that the resources 
are available to meet these liabilities if necessary, based on the 
expected timing of potential payments (see Financial review 
page 22). 

•  Global Covid-19 pandemic 

This risk arose in 2020 and the Board of Directors continue 
to monitor its potential impact. The potential impact of the 
pandemic is currently unknown but may include production 
disruption due to government restrictions, impact on our 
workforce, supply chain disruption, customer sales and ability 
to access funding facilities as detailed in note 2 to the financial 
statements.

Confirmation of longer-term viability
The Board has undertaken a robust assessment of these risks 
and the other principal risks faced by the business detailed on 
pages 30 to 39 of the Annual Report. As noted in the going concern 
disclosures in note 2 to the financial statements which highlight a 
material uncertainty in respect of going concern, should the 2010 
and certain 2015 rental fee claims fall due in the next 12 months 
or disruption to production occur in excess of one month due to the 
Covid-19 in conjunction with depressed prices, the Group would 
likely need to utilise its Tascom facilities, make forward gas sales, 
agree a payment plan with the tax authorities or take such other 
measures as necessary to safeguard its viability.  As set out in the 
going concern disclosures the Board anticipates such steps to be 
achievable and therefore, combined with the debt-free status of the 
Group, its cash resources and anticipated cash generation the Board 
has a reasonable expectation that the Company will continue to be 
viable and meet its liabilities over the assessment period.

Section 172 Statement
The Directors are mindful of their duty to promote the success of 
the Company in accordance with S 172 of the Companies Act for 
the benefit of its members as a whole and in doing so to have regard 
for the matters set out in S 172 (1) (a)-(f). Further details of how the 
Directors have had regard to the issues, factors and stakeholders 
considered relevant in complying with S 172 (1) (a)-(f), the methods 
used to engage with stakeholders and  the effect on the Group’s 
decision during the year can be found throughout this report 
and in particular at page 12  (where matters relating to  the 
Group’s  business model, stakeholder map and stakeholder relations 
are addressed), page 13 (where strategic objectives are addressed), 
pages 14 and 15 and the CSR report on page 25 (in relation to 
decision-making).

The Directors have applied a structured decision-making process 
supported by detailed information relevant to any decision. In 
addition the Board has received regular management information 
and HSE updates from expertly qualified staff. This information 
has, when appropriate, expressly addressed the interests of 
employees, the impact on business relationships with suppliers, 
customers and others, the impact of the Company and Group’s 
operations on relevant communities and the environment, the 
potential impact on the Company’s reputation for high standards, 
with Board decisions being recorded in writing and maintained as 
part of the Company’s minutes. This process aims to ensure that all 
relevant issues are identified and considered by the Board whilst 
coming to a decision on any issue.

39

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report  2018

The Board has encouraged senior management in each location to 
engage with staff, suppliers, customers and the community in order 
to assist the Board in discharging its obligations. Board members 
also carry out regular site visits enabling staff to raise issues 
directly with them and to enable them to meet key contractors 
when necessary.

The Board has undertaken specific training with its private 
practice corporate lawyers in order to ensure that it is aware of 
its responsibilities under S 172 and in particular to ensure that 
all members are fully aware of the need to act fairly between its 
members, especially given the presence of a number of long term 
significant shareholders and the existence of a nominee of the 
largest shareholder on its Board.

Governance and 
Financial statements

Governance

Board composition  

Corporate governance  

Audit committee report  

Directors’ remuneration report  

Directors’ report - other disclosures  

Financial statements

Group

Independent auditors’ report  

Consolidated income statement  

Consolidated statement of comprehensive income  

Consolidated statement of financial position  

Consolidated statement of changes in equity  

Consolidated statement of cash flows  

Notes to the consolidated financial statements  

Company 

40

42

50

55

74

77

85

87

88

89

90

91

Company statement of financial position  

Company statement of changes in equity  

Notes to the Company financial statements  

129

130

131

40 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GOVERNANCE 

Board composition 

Charles Valceschini  Chairman 

Appointed – 16 September 2019 

Experience – Mr Valceschini has worked in the oil and gas sector for nearly 40 years 
and currently specialises in the provision of technical and commercial advice to a wide 
range of upstream oil and gas companies. Mr Valceschini was previously engaged in 
technical and leadership roles for a range of companies including BP, TNK-BP and other 
international upstream companies. During 2000 and 2001 he was CEO and CFO of 
American Energy Group Limited. Mr Valceschini has a degree in Petroleum Engineering 
from the University of Wyoming, an MSc in Engineering Management from Portland 
State University and is an alumnus of the INSEAD Executive Management programme 
and Moscow School of Management at Skolkovo Project Academy. 

Victor Gladun  Executive Director, Chief Executive Officer 

Appointed – 23 May 2019 

Experience – Victor Gladun studied engineering and finance. He graduated from 
Harvard Law School (International Taxation), participated in Harvard University’s 
project on macroeconomic transformations in Ukraine, and holds the US Brandeis 
University’s Master’s Degree in Sustainable International Development. Victor held 
executive positions in a number of leading international companies in the USA, Ukraine, 
and Russia. He has worked for TNK-BP, Mitsubishi Motors/NIKO and DTEK. Victor has 
experience in business development, promotion and crisis management. 

Tony Alves  Senior Independent Director 

Appointed – 16 September 2019 

Experience – Mr Alves has worked in the oil and gas sector for over 30 years. From 
January 2009 until June 2016 he served as an Executive Director and Chief Financial 
Officer for AIM Listed Volga Gas plc, with whom he remains as a consultant. Previously 
he was one of the leading equity analysts covering the sector including periods as Head 
of Oil and Gas research for Peel Hunt and with Investec, Bell Group International and 
Schroders. Mr Alves read Mathematics at Cambridge University, both as an 
undergraduate and a post-graduate research student. 

Dr. Rashid Javanshir  Non Executive Director 

Appointed – 16 September 2019 

Experience – Dr. Rashid Javanshir worked at BP for over 20 years in senior 
management roles including Senior Vice President for Strategy & Integration in Global 
Upstream, London (2012 - 2015) and Regional President for Azerbaijan - Georgia - 
Turkey (2009 -2012). He also led BP's Southern North Sea Gas Operations in 2003-2006. 
Dr. Javanshir is a distinguished scientist with more than 150 books and papers 
published internationally. He holds a PhD in Geophysics from Moscow Gubkin 
University and a Doctoral Degree in Geology and Mineralogy from the Institute of 
Geology in Baku. He has completed management programmes in several US 
Universities, and is an alumnus of Harvard Business School. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
41 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Michael Bakunenko  Non Executive Director 

Appointed – 8 December 2017 

Experience – an Executive Chairman of the Board at PJSC Ukrnaftoburinnya, the third 
largest private oil and gas E&P Company in Ukraine since September 2015. From 2011 
to 2015 Mr. Bakunenko was Deputy Board Chairman, Director of Corporate 
Development and Strategy at PJSC Ukrnafta, the largest oil company in Ukraine. Prior 
to this Mr. Bakunenko worked for 8 years in the investment banking industry, notably 
at Goldman Sachs in New York and Renaissance Capital in Moscow and Kiev. Mr. 
Bakunenko holds a Bachelor’s degree from Lehigh University and a Master’s degree 
from Columbia University.  

Appointed 

Resigned/Stood Down 

Hans Jochum Horn Chairman  

24 October 2017 

23 May 2019 

Andrey Shtyrba Non Executive Director 

24 October 2017 

22 August 2019 

Adrian Coates Non Executive Director 

8 December 2017 

23 May 2019 

Christian Bukovics Non Executive Director 

9 February 2018 

22 August 2019 

 
 
 
 
42 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GOVERNANCE 

Corporate governance 

Governance principles 

The Company has a premium listing on the London Stock Exchange and is subject to the Listing Rules of the UK Listing Authority. The 
Board is committed to applying the principles of the 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code (‘the Code’) and relevant institutional 
shareholder guidelines. This section explains in more detail how we have applied these provisions.  

JKX’s Group-wide policies and procedures provide a framework for governance and are underpinned by the Group’s Code of Conduct. 
Good governance is taken seriously and the Board sets the tone and takes the lead to ensure that good practice flows throughout the 
Group.  

Governance framework  

Chairman 

BOARD 
Non Executive Chairman,  
3 Non Executive Directors (including  two independent 
Non Executive Directors) 
Executive Director 

Nomination 
Committee 

Group Risk 
Committee 

Audit 
Committee 

Remuneration 
Committee 

PPC Risk Committee 

YGE Risk Committee 

JKX Board changes during 2019 

On 23 May 2019 the 2019 AGM was held at which all directors, including the Chairman, stood down and presented themselves for 
reappointment by the Shareholders.  

Hans Jochum Horn and Adrian Coates were not reappointed and immediately ceased to be directors. Christian Bukovics and 
Andrey Shtyrba were reappointed but resigned on the same day, their notice period expiring on the 22 August 2019.  Mr Victor 
Gladun was appointed as an Executive Director at the same AGM. 

Following the 2019 AGM the Board consisted of 2 independent non-executive directors (Christian Bukovics and Andrey Shtyrba) 
one non-executive director who was not independent (Michael Bakunenko) and an executive director ( Victor Gladun1).  

Following the expiry of the notice period of Christian Bukovics and Andrey Shtyrba on the 22 August 2019 the Board consisted of 
one non-executive director who was not independent (Michael Bakunenko) and an executive director ( Victor Gladun). 

On 16 September 2019, following a search by independent executive search consultants (Ward Howell International), Mr Charles 
Valceschini was appointed as an independent non-executive director and Chairman, Mr Tony Alves was appointed as an 
independent non-executive director and Senior Independent Director and Mr Rashid Javanshir was appointed as an independent 
non-executive director. Ward Howell International has no other connection with the Company or any director. 

1 Victor Gladun is a director appointed from the workforce in accordance with the recommendations of Chapter 1 Provision 5 of 
the Code. The Board believes he will bring a workforce view to the boardroom and as a financial professional and General Director 
of PPC is in a position to contribute to discussions on wider issues. 

 
 
 
 
                                                                                          
 
43 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

On 20 September 2019 the following Board Committee appointments were made: Nomination Committee:  Charles Valceschini 
(Committee Chairman), Tony Alves, Dr. Rashid Javanshir, Michael Bakunenko, Victor Gladun; Remuneration Committee:  Dr. 
Rashid Javanshir (Committee Chairman), Charles Valceschini, Tony Alves; and Audit Committee: Tony Alves, (Committee 
Chairman), Dr. Rashid Javanshir. On the same date Victor Gladun was appointed as Chief Executive Officer of the Group. 

The Group is now led by a Board of Directors consisting of a Non Executive Chairman, two independent Non Executive Directors, 
one  Non Executive Director who represents the interests of Eclairs, JKX’s largest shareholder with a holding of over 27% and an 
Executive Chairman. 

During the Period from 23 May until 20 September the Board did not comply with the Code in relation to the makeup of the Board 
(where there were insufficient independent non-executive directors during certain periods), the Chairman of the Board (where 
there was none appointed from 23rd May until 16th September) and the Board Committees (where due to the makeup of the Board 
they were not constituted in accordance with the requirements of the Code). In addition Dr Rashid Javanshir did not have at least 
12 months experience on a Remuneration Committee before being appointed as Chairman of that Committee. The Board however 
took into account the size of the Group, the existing remuneration structure and Dr Javanshir’s general management experience 
and considered him well suited to the role. 

Board effectiveness 

Role of the Board 
The Board provides leadership to the Group. Key matters reserved for the consideration and the approval of the Board are:  

  setting and monitoring Group strategy; 

  review of Group business plans, trading performance and costs; 

  review and approval of the annual operating and capital expenditure budgets; 

  approval of capital investment projects across the Group; 

  examination of acquisition opportunities, divestment possibilities and significant financial and operational issues; 

  remuneration policy (through the Remuneration Committee); 

  appointments to the Board (through the Nominations Committee) and senior management, Committee membership and 

remuneration for Directors and senior management; 

  review and approval of the Company’s financial statements (through the Audit Committee); 

  setting any interim dividend and recommendation of the final dividend; and 

  ensuring that significant business risks are actively monitored and managed using robust control and risk management systems. 

In addition, the Board considers strategy in depth as well as reviewing the strategic objectives of the Company at each of its Board 
meetings. 

All other authorities are delegated by the Board, supported by appropriate controls, to the Chief Executive, Chief Financial Officer and 
General Directors of PPC and YGE. 

How the Board functions 
The Board has historically held six scheduled meetings each year, and arranges additional meetings if the need arises. During 2019, 
there were  five  unscheduled Board meetings (2018: six), including one meeting at which  the Non Executive Directors met in private 
session, with an open agenda to discuss the current issues affecting the Group (2018: once). The number of unscheduled Board meetings 
in 2019 was needed for the Board members to build a strategic direction for the Company and to address ongoing developments. 

The Chairman, in consultation with the Directors and senior executives, sets the agenda for Board meetings. All Directors receive 
comprehensive documentation prior to each meeting on the matters to be discussed. 

Monthly Board reporting  
The Group provides the Board with a monthly performance update each month after the month end. The monthly reports outline all 
material operational, health & safety, financial, commercial and strategic developments.  

The monthly reports consolidate all financial and operational information from all parts of the Group and include actual performance 
against budget and forecast for oil and gas production, sales and costs.  

These reports provide the Board with the latest information on cash, cash flow forecast, receivables and payables and the implications 
of key sensitivities including changes in production, commodity prices, production taxes and exchange rates. These monthly reports 
ensure that board members remain properly briefed on the performance and financial position of the Group. 

Board meeting documents 
Prior to each set of meetings the Chairman ensures that all the relevant papers and other information is delivered, where possible, at 
least five days in advance of the meeting date so that all Directors have the necessary time to review in detail the latest information.  

 
 
44 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GOVERNANCE 

Corporate governance 

Support for Directors 
The Board has adopted a policy whereby Directors may, in the furtherance of their duties, seek independent professional advice at the 
Company’s expense.  

Each Director has the benefit of a deed of indemnity from the Company and its subsidiaries in respect of claims made and liabilities 
incurred, in either case arising out of the bona fide discharge by the Director of his or her duties. The Company has also arranged 
appropriate directors’ and officers’ insurance cover in respect of legal action against Directors of the Company and its subsidiaries. 

Committees of the Board in 2019  

During 2019 the Board had three committees focusing on specialist areas, which were ultimately accountable to the Board. These 
comprised: 

  the Audit Committee; 

  the Nominations Committee; and 

  the Remuneration Committee. 

The Board committees met independently and provided feedback to the main Board through their chairmen. 

There was also an executive Risk Committee chaired by the Chief Financial Officer and comprising group employees. 

Committee memberships during 2019 

Audit Committee 

Remuneration Committee 

Nomination Committee 

Hans Jochum Horn1 

Michael Bakunenko 

Christian Bukovics3 

Adrian Coates1 

Andrey Shtyrba3 

Charles Valceschini4 

Tony Alves4 

Victor Gladun4 

Rashid javanshir4 

Member 

Member 

- 

Chairman 

Member 

- 

Chairman 

- 

Member 

Member 

Member2 

Member 

- 

Chairman 

Member 

Member 

- 

Chairman 

Chairman 

Member5 

Member 

Member 

Member 

Chairman 

Member 

Member 

Member 

1  Ceased to be a director and to hold any committee appointments from 23 May 2019. 
2  Ceased to be a member  on 20 September 2019 
3  Ceased to be a director and to hold any committee appointments from 22 August  2019 
4  Appointed as a member of the Board on 16 September 2019 and a member of the relevant board committees on 20 September 2019. 
5  Appointed as a member on 20 September 2019 

The roles and activities of each of these committees during 2019 are noted on pages 45, 46, 51 and 58. 

Board composition, independence and commitment 
Until the 23 May 2019 the Board comprised 5 individuals: 

  The Non Executive Chairman (Hans Jochum Horn),  

  1 Non Executive Director (Michael Bakunenko) representing the interests of Eclairs, JKX’s largest shareholder with a holding of over 

27%, and 

  3 independent Non Executive Directors (Christian Bukovics, Adrian Coates, Andrey Shtyrba) who were assessed as independent on 

the basis, inter alia, that the matters set out in Provision 10 of the Code did not apply to  them. 

Following the decision of the AGM not to reappoint Hans Jochum Horn and Adrian Coates on 23 May 2019 the Board comprised 4 
individuals: 

  1 Non Executive Director (Michael Bakunenko)  representing the interests of Eclairs, JKX’s largest shareholder with a holding of over 

27%, and 

  2 independent Non Executive Directors (Christian Bukovics and Andrey Shtyrba) who were assessed as independent on the basis, 

inter alia, that the matters set out in Provision 10 of the Code did not apply to them. 

  1 Executive Director (Victor Gladun). 

Following the expiry of Christian Bukovics and Andrey Shtyrba’s notice period on 22 August 2019 the Board comprised 2 individuals: 

  1 Non Executive Director representing the interests of Eclairs, JKX’s largest shareholder with a holding of over 27%, and 

  1 Executive Director (Victor Gladun). 

 
 
 
45 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Following the appointment of Charles Valceschini , Tony Alves and Rashid Javanshir on 16   September  2019 the Board comprised 5 
individuals:  

  The Non Executive Chairman (Charles Valceschini),  

  1 Non Executive Director (Michael Bakunenko) representing the interests of Eclairs, JKX’s largest shareholder with a holding of over 

27%, and 

  2 independent Non Executive Directors (Tony Alves, Rashid Javanshir) who were assessed as independent on the basis, inter alia, that 

the matters set out in Provision 10 of the Code did not apply to  them; and  

  1 Executive Director (Victor Gladun). 

It is the Board’s view that the current Non Executive Directors have sufficient time to fulfil their commitments to the Company. The 
Board does however regularly consider the appropriateness of Board composition.  

Board skills, experience and responsibilities 
The Board has significant knowledge and experience of the oil and gas industry, engineering and financial matters in central and 
eastern Europe, particularly Ukraine and Russia as well as Central Asia. The key biographical details, relevant experience and 
responsibilities of each Director are provided on pages 40 and 41. 

The Non Executive Directors bring the skills and expertise necessary to challenge effectively, independently and constructively, the 
performance of the Company and its strategy. 

Board diversity 
During the period covered by this report the Board consisted entirely of men. The Board consisted of 4 different nationalities at 
31 December 2019.  

Gender is only one aspect of diversity, and there are many other attributes and experiences that can improve the Board’s ability to act 
effectively. Our policy is to search for the highest quality people with the most appropriate experience for the requirements of the 
business, be they men or women.  

The Board supports the longer term aspirations of Lord Davies’ report regarding gender diversity on appointment of directors to boards 
and will maintain its practice of embracing diversity in all its forms, but has chosen not to set any measurable objectives. Currently the 
CEO and his immediate reports consist entirely of men. 

Senior Independent Director 
Adrian Coates was Senior Independent Director (‘SID’) until 23 May 2019. Following the decision of the AGM not to reappoint Adrian 
Coates as a Director on 23 May 2019 there was no SID until Tony Alves was appointed as SID on 16  September 2019. 

The SID is available for discussions with other Non Executive Directors who may have concerns which they believe have not been 
properly considered by the Board as a whole.  

A key responsibility of the SID is to ensure he is available to shareholders if they have concerns that have not been resolved by contact 
through the normal channels of Chairman, Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer or where such contact is inappropriate. 

2019 Board evaluation process 
During the first quarter of 2019 the Senior Independent Director reviewed the performance of the Chairman and the Nomination 
Committee carried out an internal Board and Committee Evaluation. In both cases detailed feedback was provided and where relevant 
action plans put in place to address any issues. 

External evaluation 
As the Company was outside of the FTSE 350 during 2019 there was no requirement for an externally-facilitated evaluation of the 
Board at least every three years, although an internal Board and committee evaluation was conducted. The Chairman will consider the 
relevance of an externally facilitated evaluation in due course. 

Development of the Board 
All Directors are provided with opportunities for further development and training updates. In addition to the updates on governance, 
legal and regulatory matters, the Board receives invitations to detailed briefings from advisers and at their seminars on a variety of 
topics that are relevant to the Group and its strategy. The newly appointed Directors all received a full day’s induction training session, 
including specific presentations on key topics and detailed briefings on legal, regulatory and compliance matters from the Company’s 
external legal, financial and communications advisers. 

Board activities 

Attendance at meetings 
When a Director is unable to participate in a meeting either in person or remotely because of another engagement, they are provided 
with the briefing materials and the Chairman will solicit their views on key items of business ahead of time, in order for the views to be 
presented at the meeting and influence the debate.  

The number of meetings of the Board and its committees during 2019 and individual attendance by Director is shown below: 

 
46 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GOVERNANCE 

Corporate governance 

Board and Committee meeting attendance in 2019 

Number of meetings 

Attendance/Eligibility: 

Hans Jochum Horn 

Board 

11 

Board 

3/3 

Michael Bakunenko 

10/11 

Christian Bukovics 

Adrian Coates 

Andrey Shtyrba 

Charles Valceshini 

Tony Alves 

Victor Gladun 

Rashid Javanshir 

7/7 

3/3 

6/7 

3/3 

3/3 

8/8 

3/3 

Audit Committee 

Remuneration Committee 

Nomination Committee 

3 

3 

3 

Audit Committee 

Remuneration Committee 

Nomination Committee 

2/2 

2/2 

_ 

2/2 

2/2 

2/2 

1/1 

- 

1/1 

1/1 

1/1 

1/1 

- 

1/1 

2/2 

2/2 

- 

2/2 

1/1 

- 

1/1 

1/1 

1/1 

2/2 

2/2 

- 

2/2 

Senior management from across the Group, and advisers, attend some of the meetings for the discussion of specific items in greater 
depth. This is important to the Board as it further enhances the Board’s understanding of operations and the implementation of 
strategy. 

Board’s work during 2019 
During the year the Board used a rolling agenda of strategy, finance, operations, commercial matters, corporate governance and 
compliance including the matters set out below. All Directors have the authority to add any item to the Board agenda. 

  Reports from the General Directors of each of the two  major operating units  on strategic, and operational matters including political 

and economic developments, 

  The Chief Financial Officer’s report, and following his appointment the Chief Executive Officer’s report,  which includes a report of 

actual performance against budget, reforecasting,  updates on oil, gas and condensate prices, 

  HSECQ matters, 

  Additional funding and growth opportunities, 

  Compliance (including Anti Bribery and Corruption) issues, 

  Where applicable, reports from the Nominations Committee, Audit Committee and Remuneration Committee, 

In addition to the standing agenda items and annual Board responsibilities in respect of the Group’s reporting, other topics covered by 
the Board during the year included: 

  the implementation of the Board’s updated strategy for the Company reflecting matters such as the deployment of an improved 

contractor base, a focus on cost control and the execution of low risk, high margin operations; 

  managing the Group’s liquidity including the payment of principal and interest on the  existing Convertible Bond;  

  review of crude oil and gas storage strategy; 

  reduction in overhead costs and improved efficiency; 

  increased transparency and engagement with shareholders regarding production and operations with a regular reporting schedule. 

  identifying and addressing critical  gaps in the Board and senior management team; 

  monitoring enhanced management information updates focussing on key parameters including production, liquidity and future cash 

flow; 

  disposal of non-core assets and reviewing the group portfolio; 

  review of organic and inorganic growth opportunities, particularly in Ukraine; 

  simplification of Group structure; 

  review and management of ongoing tax and other litigation; 

  identifying sources of third party financing; and 

  appointment of expert executive search agents and identification of appropriate replacement directors. 

Re-electing your Board 
The Board contains a broad range of experience and skills from a variety of industries and advisory roles, which fully complement each other. 

 
 
 
 
 
47 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

In line with the Code all the Directors (including the Chairman) stood down and offered themselves for reappointment at the 2019 
Annual General Meeting. Additionally Victor Gladun was proposed for appointment as a director.  

Whilst Michael Bakunenko, Victor Gladun, Andrei Shtyrba and Christian Bukovics were reappointed at the AGM Hans Jochum Horn 
and Adrian Coates were not. Immediately following the conclusion of the 2019 AGM Andrey Shtyrba and Christian Bukovics tendered 
their resignations which expired on 22 August 2019. 

3 further independent non-executive directors (Charles Valceschini, Tony Alves and Dr. Rashid Javanshir) were appointed by the Board 
on 16 September 2019, as described on page 42. 

In line with the recommendations of the Code the Directors have all agreed to stand down and submit themselves to the shareholders 
for reappointment at the 2020 AGM.  

Full biographies of all the Directors can be found on pages 40 and 41. 

Nomination Committee 
The role of the Nomination Committee is to review the structure, size, skills and composition of the Company Board and the Boards of 
companies owned by JKX Oil & Gas plc. The Committee also considers succession planning and suitable nominations for appointments 
to the Boards, and makes appropriate recommendations based on qualifications and experience. The Nomination Committee regularly 
reviews the management structure of the Company and seeks ways to minimise any negative impact. During Q1 2019 the Nomination 
Committee carried out an internal Board and Committee evaluation 

The Committee meets as often as it determines is appropriate. Generally it meets at least once a year and more frequently if required.  

Committee member since 

To 

Number of meetings in 2019 
Attendance/Eligibility 

Hans Jochum Horn (Chairman)  November 2017 

23 May 2019 

Christian Bukovics 

February 2018 

22 August 2019 

Adrian Coates 

Andrey Shtyrba 

December 2017 

23 May 2019 

November 2017 

22 August 2019 

Charles Valceschini (Chairman)  September 2019 

Tony Alves 

September 2019 

Michael Bakunenko 

September 2019 

Victor Gladun 

Rashid Javanshir 

September 2019 

September 2019 

Present 

Present 

Present 

Present 

Present 

1/1 

1/1 

1/1 

1/1 

2/2 

2/2 

2/2 

2/2 

2/2 

The Committee met 3 times during 2019 (2018: 5). During 2019 3 new independent Non Executive Directors (Charles Valceschini, Tony 
Alves and Rashid Javanshir) were appointed following a search by an independent search consultant (Ward Howell International ) that 
has no other connection with the Group. In addition Victor Gladun was appointed as an executive director and Chief Executive Officer 
in addition to his existing role as General Director of PPC. 

Membership and process  
During 2019 the membership of the Nomination Committee underwent significant change as a consequence of changes in the Board 
membership. In order to ensure continuity of understanding the new members of the Board were provided with copies of previous 
committee minutes and the Chairman ensured that new Directors were provided with a full induction.  

In the period from 22 August until 20 September the Nomination Committee did not comply with the Code as there were no 
independent non-executive directors until 16 September.  

The letters of appointment of each Non Executive Director are available for inspection at the registered office of the Company. 

Succession planning 
The Board is responsible for succession planning for Directorships and key management roles. This requires performance and talent 
assessment in order to ensure that able successors for key roles are identified and then provided with suitable opportunities through 
career and personal development plans. It is crucial that we remunerate our most talented people fairly and properly such that they are 
more likely to stay in our employment.  

Revision of Terms of Reference 
The Nomination Committee reviewed its terms of reference against the Code and proposed a number of amendments to the Board to 
ensure it remained in compliance with the Code. The Board unanimously approved these amendments and the revised terms of 
reference are available on the Company’s website. 

 
 
 
48 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GOVERNANCE 

Corporate governance 

Compliance 

Compliance with the 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code 
The Board believes that, except in relation to the composition of the Board and certain Board Committees following the 2019 AGM and 
the appointment of Dr Rashid Javanshir as Chairman of the Remuneration Committee the Company was fully compliant during 2019 
with the provisions set out in the Code. 

Internal control and risk management 
The Board has overall responsibility for the Group’s system of internal control and for reviewing its effectiveness. The internal control 
systems are designed to meet the particular needs of the Group and to manage rather than eliminate the risk of failure to achieve 
business objectives. Such systems can only provide reasonable and not absolute assurance against material misstatement or loss. 

The Board is responsible for identifying and evaluating the major business risks faced by the Company and for determining and 
monitoring the appropriate course of action to manage these risks. The Audit Committee reviews the Company’s internal control 
processes and risk management systems and reports its conclusions to the Board. 

During the year the Board has reviewed and strengthened a number of key internal control processes, in particular to reflect the 
appointment of a Chief Executive Officer, including those relating to approval of expenditure.  

The Board has concluded that for the period up until the date of the Annual Report the Company’s current procedures, policies and 
systems are appropriate and suitable to enable the Board to safeguard shareholders’ investment and the Company’s assets, and comply 
with FRC ‘Risk Management, Internal Control and Related Financial Business Reporting Guidance’. 

The Board has carried out a robust assessment of the principal risks facing the Company, including those that would threaten its 
business model, future performance, solvency or liquidity. Details of the principal risks and how they are managed or mitigated is 
included on pages 30 to 39. Further information on internal control and risk management is set out in the Audit Committee Report on 
page 50. 

Budgetary process 
Each year the Board reviews and approves the Group’s annual budget with key risk areas identified. The preparation of the annual 
Group budget is a multi-stage comprehensive process led by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer who work closely 
with local managers of operating subsidiaries in Russia and Ukraine. 

Performance is monitored through the monthly reporting to the Board of variances from the budget. Relevant action is taken by the 
Board throughout the year based on updated forecasts which are prepared using current information on the key risk areas and 
sensitivities. 

Investment appraisal 
For each capital intensive project there is a rigorous project analysis and risk and return appraisal completed using technical, financial, 
commercial, and operational specialists across the Group. The Board has reviewed the approach to ensure the most effective allocation 
of capital across the group as part of a wider consideration of the Company’s strategy.  

Capital investment is regulated by the budgetary process, our automated authorisation for expenditure (‘AFE’) system and pre-defined 
authorisation levels. For expenditure beyond specified levels, detailed written proposals are submitted to the Board.  

Using our AFE system Group capital expenditures are reviewed on a project-by-project basis by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief 
Financial Officer and overruns, actual or foreseen, are investigated, and approved by the Board where appropriate.  

Whistleblowing 
The Board reviews the arrangements by which employees and others can raise any concerns they may have about workplace fraud or 
mismanagement with local management on a confidential basis. Whistleblowing incidents are taken very seriously by the Board.  

As part of the Board’s commitment to support our employees in the work place, we have a confidential process for reporting “Concerns 
at Work”. This is a confidential service for reporting delicate matters that sometimes arise in the work place. 

In addition, this service forms part of the Company’s commitment to comply with best practice under the UK Bribery Act. As disclosed 
in our Anti-Bribery and Corruption policy which is available on the Company’s website, all individuals who work on behalf of the Group 
have a responsibility to help detect, prevent and report instances not only of bribery but also of any other suspicious activity or 
potential wrongdoing.  

Employees are expected to make complaints to their line managers or, if this is not appropriate, through our independently managed 
confidential reporting process, which is available to all employees as well as third parties.  

Complaints made under the confidential reporting service are sent to the Internal Audit Manager and are investigated in the first 
instance prior to a decision being taken about further steps. Feedback is provided to the person making the complaint, if necessary. 

The Board is absolutely committed to ensuring that all employees have a safe, reliable, and confidential way of reporting any suspicious activity. 

 
49 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Communication with shareholders 
The Board is committed to frequent and comprehensive communication with all shareholders. The Board is committed to an open 
relationship involving regular communications in order that shareholders views on the Group can be better understood and addressed 
as appropriate. 

A number of formal communication channels are used to account to shareholders for the performance of the Group, which include the 
Annual Report, AGMs and periodic reports to the London Stock Exchange. 

Formal presentations, when made, are available to all shareholders to download from the Group’s website (www.jkx.co.uk). Less formal 
processes include contacts with other shareholders for which the Board as a whole takes responsibility. 

Extensive information about the Group’s activities is provided in the Annual Report and the Half-yearly Report. Enquiries from 
individuals on matters relating to their shareholding and the business of the Group are welcomed and are dealt with in an informative 
and timely manner. Shareholders are encouraged to attend the Annual General Meeting to discuss the progress of the Group. 

Conflicts of Interest 
The Company complies with the provisions on conflicts of interest in the Companies Act 2006.  

The Company has procedures in place for the disclosure and review of any conflicts, or potential conflicts of interest which the 
Directors may have and for the authorisation of such conflicting matters by the Board. In deciding whether to authorise a conflict or 
potential conflict the Directors must have regard to their general duties under the Companies Act 2006. The procedure operates to 
ensure the disclosure of conflicts, and for the consideration and if appropriate, the authorisation of them by non-conflicted Directors.  

The authorisation of a conflict matter, and the terms of authorisation, may be reviewed at any time by the Board. The Nomination 
Committee is mandated to support the Board in this process, being tasked to review requests from Directors for authorisations of 
situations of actual or potential conflict and making recommendations to the Board and to review any situations of actual or potential 
conflict that have been previously authorised by the Board. The Committee may also make recommendations regarding 
appropriateness of the authorisation. 

Going concern 
The Board closely monitors and manages the Group’s liquidity risk using cash flow forecasts which are regularly produced and applies 
sensitivities for different scenarios that reflect future expectations including but not limited to those regarding country, commodity 
price and currency risks that the Group may encounter.  

On behalf of the Board 

Charles Valceschini 
Chairman 
31 March  2020 

 
 
 
50 

GOVERNANCE 

Audit committee report 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Attendance and eligibility 

Member 

Committee member since 

Number of meetings in 2019 
Attendance/Eligibility 

Adrian Coates (as Chairman) 

December 2017 

Ceased to be a member 23/5/19  2/2 

Michael Bakunenko 

December 2017 

Ceased to be a member 20/9/19  2/2 

Hans Jochum Horn 

Andrey Shtyrba  

October 2017 

October 2017 

Ceased to be a member 23/5/19  2/2 

Resigned 22/8/19 

Tony Alves (Chairman) 

September 2019 

Rashid Javanshir 

September 2019 

Present 

Present 

2/2 

1/1 

1/1 

The Audit Committee currently comprises 2 Non Executive Directors, both of whom are independent.  

Audit Committee during 2019 

Adrian Coates (Chairman), Michael Bakunenko, Hans Jochum Horn and Andrey Shtyrba were the members of the Audit Committee 
until 23 May 2019. Following the decision at the AGM not to reappoint Adrian Coates or Hans Jochum Horn the Audit Committee 
consisted of Andrey Shtryba and Michael Bakunenko. Following the expiry of Andrey Shtyrba’s notice period on 22 August 2019 
Michael Bakunenko was the only member of the Audit Committee until 20 September 2019 when Tony Alves (as Chairman of the Audit 
Committee) and Rashid Javanshir were appointed as members and Michael Bakunenko stood down. Up until 20 September 2019 the 
Audit Committee did not comply with the Code. Thereafter it did. 

The Audit Committee has carried out the requirements under the Disclosure and Transparency Rules 7.1.3R throughout the period that 
this report covers. The Board has determined that Tony Alves has relevant and relevant financial experience as defined by the Code 
and both Tony Alves and Rashid Javanshir have competence relevant to the sector in which the Company operates. 

Role of the Audit Committee 

The Audit Committee has delegated authority from the Board set out in its written terms of reference, available on the Company’s 
website, which were last reviewed by the Board in Q4 2019 in order to bring them into line with the latest recommendations of the 
Code. The principal objectives of the Audit Committee are: 

  to monitor the integrity of the financial statements of the Group and regulatory announcements, and to review any significant 

financial reporting judgements;  

  to monitor the adequacy and effectiveness of the Group’s internal control, risk management and financial reporting processes; 

  to provide  the Board with an independent assessment of the Group’s accounting affairs and financial position; 

  to provide the Board with assurance that  the Annual Report and Accounts are presented in a manner that is fair, balanced and 

understandable, so as to enable shareholders to assess the Group’s performance, business model and strategy; 

  to recommend the re-appointment of the external auditors or following an appropriate competitive tender recommend the 

appointment of a new external auditor  and to  annually assess their independence, objectivity,  effectiveness, quality, 
remuneration and terms of engagement, as well as ensuring that the policy with regard to their appointment for non-audit 
services is appropriately applied. Thereafter, the Committee provides a recommendation to the Board regarding the auditors 
appointment to be put to the shareholders in the forthcoming annual general meeting; and 

  to manage the adequacy and effectiveness of the Internal Audit function and the Risk Committee and to review any significant 

matters arising.  

Composition of the Audit Committee 

The Board determined that Andrey Shtyrba, Hans Jochum Horn , Adrian Coates  and Tony Alves had recent and relevant financial 
experience gained through their previous and current roles.  

The composition of the Audit Committee over the relevant period provided the Committee with an appropriate balance between those 
individuals with a financial or accounting background and those with wider experience of the oil and gas sector and doing business in 
regions in which JKX operates. In practice, the Committee achieves its objectives by a process of regular interaction with management 
and the external auditors, as well as by reviewing the work of Internal Audit and other advisory firms. 

Together with the collective financial and commercial skills and experience of the Committee members, the Committee had the 
appropriate experience to fulfil its responsibilities and oversee the activities of the Company’s auditors. 

Revision of Terms of Reference 

In Q4 2019 the Audit Committee reviewed its terms of reference against the Code and proposed a number of amendments to the Board 
to ensure it remained in compliance with the Code. The Board unanimously approved these amendments and the revised terms of 
reference are available on the Company’s website. 

 
 
 
51 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Attendance at meetings 

The Audit Committee met three times during 2019 (2018: 6). 

The Committee’s meetings were attended, when considered appropriate by the Chairman of the Committee, by other Directors 
including the Chief Executive, the Chief Financial Officer, the external auditors and other professional advisers, and by certain senior 
managers who are responsible for specific topics, such as risk management, internal audit, financial control, and internal compliance 
procedures.  

The Committee Chairman maintains contact with those other attendees throughout the year. Twice during 2019 (2018: twice) the 
Committee Chairman met with the external auditors to discuss matters which the auditors and Audit Committee may wish to raise.  

The Committee’s activities during 2019 

During the period covered by this report, the Committee had an annual work plan, developed from its terms of reference, with standing 
items that the Committee considered at each meeting in addition to any specific matters arising and topical items on which the 
Committee has chosen to focus. 

The work of the Audit Committee during the year principally fell under three main areas and is summarised below. 

Internal controls and risk 

External auditors 

Accounting, tax and  
financial reporting 

  Considered reports from the external 
auditors on their assessment of the 
control environment; 

  Considered feedback from both the 

  Considered and approved the audit 

  Reviewed the half year and annual 

approach and scope of the audit work 
to be undertaken by the external 
auditors and the fees for the same; 

financial statements and the 
significant financial reporting 
judgements made therein;  

internal and external auditor reports 
as submitted by local and Group 
management; 

  Reviewed auditors’ reports on their 

audit findings at the half year review 
and at the year end; 

  Considered the independence of the 
auditors and their effectiveness, 
taking into account: 
(a) non-audit work undertaken by the 
external auditors and compliance with 
the policy; 
(b) FRC guidance; 
(c) the Committee’s own Assessment; 

  Considered the liquidity risk and the 
basis for preparing the Group half 
yearly and full year financial 
statements on a going concern basis 
and reviewed the related disclosures in 
the Annual Report; 

  Reviewed the external auditors’ report 
on audit and accounting judgements, 
including consideration of relevant 
accounting standards and underlying 
assumptions; 

  Considered and approved letters of 

  Reviewed disclosures in the Annual 

representation issued to the external 
auditors; and 

  Agreement of the external auditors’ 
remuneration for the 2019 statutory 
accounts. 

Report in relation to internal controls, 
risk management, principal risks and 
uncertainties and the work of the 
Committee;  

  Ongoing analysis of future cash flow 
and liquidity and implementation of 
monthly financial update reports; 

  Review of Transfer Pricing matters ; 

and 

  Review of ongoing tax and other 

litigation. 

  Reviewed risk reports, which required 
management to identify risks and 
evaluate them, and ensured 
appropriate mitigating controls were 
agreed and implemented; 

  Approved the scope of the Internal 
Audit programme for the year; 

  Considered the effectiveness of the 

Internal Audit function; 

  Assessed the effectiveness of the 

Group’s internal control environment; 

  Review of finance, legal, internal audit 

and compliance staffing;  

  Review of enhanced interim controls 
relating to cost, procurement and 
payment and ongoing monitoring of 
their appropriateness and 
effectiveness;  

  Liaison with FCA relating to Free Float 

level; and 

Review of going concern and viability 
status and potential impact in the 
event of any adverse tax judgements. 

Significant issues considered by the Audit Committee 

After discussion with management and the external auditors, the Committee determined that the key risks of misstatement in relation 
to the Group’s 2019 financial statements related to: 

  the carrying value of oil and gas assets; 

  rental fee claims in Ukraine; 

  registration and enforcement of the international arbitration award; and 

  liquidity and going concern. 

 
 
 
 
52 

GOVERNANCE 

Audit committee report 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

These issues were discussed with management and the external auditors at the time the Committee reviewed and agreed the auditors’ 
Group Audit Plan, during the review of the half year interim financial statements in July 2019 and at the conclusion of the audit of 
these financial statements. 

Matters considered 

Response and conclusion 

The carrying value of oil and gas assets  

As explained in Note 5 to the financial statements, JKX’s oil and 
gas assets are grouped into cash generating units (‘CGUs’) for the 
purpose of assessing the recoverable amount. In each period 
these assets are reviewed for indications of impairment. If any 
assets are considered to have been impaired, the carrying value is 
adjusted downwards by an appropriate amount, with a 
corresponding charge made to the Income Statement. 

An impairment review necessarily involves the use of 
assumptions such as long-term production forecasts, gas prices, 
production-related taxes, capital expenditure, discount rates, 
and other macroeconomic assumptions underlying the valuation 
process. 

Rental fee claims in Ukraine 

As detailed in Note 25 to the financial statements, PPC continues 
to defend itself in the local courts against claims initiated by the 
tax authorities regarding rental fees for August to December 
2010 and for January to December 2015. Management has 
recorded total provisions for the rental fee claims of $41.3m 
(2018:$42.5m). The movement in provision during the year is 
reflected in a net credit of $8.4m (as set out in Note 18 to the 
financial statements) that is reported as an exceptional item. 
Management has made a detailed investigation into the mostly 
likely timing of any potential payments in respect of these rental 
fee claims and accordingly reclassified some of the 2015 rental 
fee claims as current. The underlying amounts claimed are 
denominated in UAH, which has resulted in foreign currency 
translation charges of $2.1m in relation to current provisions and 
$5.1m in relation to non-current provisions (as set out in Note 18 
to the financial statements which have been reported within  the 
movement in foreign currency translation reserve (see Note 17 
to the financial statements) 

The Committee received reports from management outlining the 
basis for each of the key assumptions used, and these 
assumptions were reviewed and challenged by the Committee to 
ensure reasonableness and consistency e.g. with the Group’s 
2020 Budget which is approved by the Board. In addition, this 
area is a prime source of audit focus and accordingly our auditors 
provided detailed reporting to the Committee. Management also 
brought to the attention of the Committee the sensitivity 
analyses disclosed in Note 5 to the financial statements.  

The Committee agreed that, on the basis of the evidence 
available, the projected future cash flows from the Group’s CGUs 
adequately supported the carrying value of oil and gas assets in 
Ukraine and Russia, and noted that full disclosure of the key 
assumptions in respect of the CGUs (including sensitivity 
analyses in Note 5) had been appropriately made in the financial 
statements. 

The Committee addressed this issue, as in previous periods, by 
reviewing reports from senior management and examining the 
degree to which these are supported by professional advice from 
external legal and other advisory firms. This is also an area of 
significant audit risk and accordingly the Committee received 
detailed verbal and written reporting from BDO LLP (“BDO”  ) on 
this matter. 

Having reviewed these reports and submissions, the Committee 
was satisfied that total provisions of $41.3m (2018:$42.5m) 
(including interest and penalties) were required in respect of the 
rental fee claims and that both the classification of the $15.9m 
provision for the 2010 rental fee claim and the classification of 
the $25.4m provision for the 2015 rental fee claims as non-
current were appropriate.  

 
 
 
 
53 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Matters considered 

Response and conclusion 

International arbitration award 

Also as detailed in Note 25 to the financial statements, in 
February 2017 an international arbitration tribunal awarded the 
Company damages of $11.8m plus interest, and costs of $0.3m, 
pursuant to a claim made against the Government of Ukraine. 
While the tribunal ruling has been recognised in the Ukrainian 
courts it has not yet been enforced. Management has judged that 
it is not appropriate to recognise any potential inflow of 
economic benefits from the arbitration award in the 
Consolidated statement of financial position until there is 
further clarity on the process for, and likely success of, enforcing 
collection. 

The Committee addressed this issue, as in previous periods, by 
reviewing reports from senior management and examining the 
degree to which these are supported by professional advice from 
external legal and other advisory firms. This is also an area of 
significant audit risk and accordingly the Committee received 
detailed verbal and written reporting from BDO on this matter. 

Having reviewed these reports and submissions, the Committee 
has concurred with management’s judgment and is satisfied that 
the disclosures made in Note 25 to the financial statements in 
respect of the international arbitration award are appropriate. 

Liquidity and going concern 

Under guidelines set out by the UK Financial Reporting Council 
the Board is required to consider whether the going concern basis 
is the appropriate basis of preparation for the financial 
statements, and furthermore, is required to include appropriate 
disclosure of any material uncertainties relevant to the going 
concern assumption. 

The Committee addressed this issue by reviewing cash flow 
forecasts, together with associated sensitivity analysis and a 
reverse stress test scenario considering risks and potential 
impacts relating to Covid 19 provided by senior management 
having considered the Group's business model. In particular this 
included examining and challenging the appropriateness of the 
assumptions used to prepare them and the scenarios considered.  

This is also an area of significant audit risk and accordingly the 
Committee received detailed verbal and written reporting from 
BDO on this matter. Having reviewed these reports and 
submissions, the Committee has advised the Board that the 
Group has adequate resources to continue in operational 
existence for the foreseeable future and that the going concern 
basis is the appropriate basis of preparation for the 2019 
financial statements but that a material uncertainty exists in 
respect of going concern as a result of potential impacts of Covid 
19 ( See Note 2 to the financial statements).   

Misstatements 

Management reported to the Committee that they were not aware of any material or immaterial misstatements made intentionally to 
achieve a particular presentation. The auditors reported the misstatements that they had found in the course of their work to the 
Committee and confirmed that no material amount remained unadjusted. 

Internal control 

The Audit Committee monitors the integrity of the financial statements and related announcements, reviews the Company’s internal 
control processes and risk management systems, and reports its conclusions to the Board. The Committee regularly reviews the 
effectiveness of the Company’s systems of internal control and risk management. 

Risk management 

The Risk Committee, which comprises senior management and functional experts, assists the Board in discharging their responsibility 
to review on an ongoing basis the risks potentially facing the Group, their potential impact, the strategies available to mitigate those 
risks and the costs of such mitigation. 

The Risk Committee met once in 2019 (2018: once). 

The Chairman of the Risk Committee reports to the Audit Committee and the Board at relevant meetings on matters it has reviewed 
and material changes to the Group’s risk environment, in addition to making recommendations when appropriate.  

Following each Risk Committee meeting, the Committee reviews the minutes, the latest Risk Register and related output, and 
challenges the Group’s high-rated risks and the mitigating actions identified by each risk owner. An updated list of principal risks is 
included within the Strategic Report on pages 32 to 39. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
54 

GOVERNANCE 

Audit committee report 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

For each high-rated risk the Committee reviews the Group’s current level of exposure and considers the appropriateness of the 
mitigating actions being taken by management. 

The Committee was comfortable with the processes in place for risk management.  

Additional information on risk management is included in the ‘Principal risks and how we manage them’ section on pages 30 to 32. 

Internal Audit 

The Internal Audit Manager has direct access to the Chairman of the Audit Committee and undertook a number of significant pieces of 

work including:  

  A health check of  the main processes established at  JKX’s Hungarian asset, including distribution of roles and responsibilities 

between JKX management and contractors; 

  Coordinating the Risk Management process at all JKX entities; 

  Continuous monitoring of the software development process at PPC during implementation of a new ERP system; and 

  Participation in Compliance Committee meetings, ensuring that supporting measures are timely taken. 

The Audit Committee remains fully supportive of the development of the Internal Audit programme which is intended to ensure that 
the necessary processes and controls are firmly embedded within our organisation making the control environment stronger and more 
efficient.  

External Audit 

The Audit Committee maintains an objective and professional relationship with the Company’s auditors, BDO LLP. BDO were appointed 
with effect from 18 October 2018 following a competitive tender process.  

The Audit Committee are fully supportive of the Code’s requirement that the audit should be put out to tender at least once in every ten 
years. Any decision to open the external audit to tender within ten years is taken on the recommendation of the Audit Committee based 
on the results of the annual performance review. 

Non-audit services 

During the year the Committee reviewed their policy governing the engagement of the external auditor to provide non-audit services. 
The policy precluded the auditor from providing certain services such as valuation work or the provision of accounting services and 
also sets a presumption that the external auditor should only be engaged for non-audit services where there is no legal or practical 
alternative supplier. 

In such instances, the continued objectivity and independence of the auditors in their capacity of auditor is an objective of the Group.  

The Committee approves all non-audit services procured from the auditors. During 2019 in addition to the statutory audit fee BDO LLP 
and member firms charged the Group $80,000 for audit-related assurance services. 

Further details of the fees paid, for both audit and non-audit services, can be found in Note 22 to the consolidated financial statements. 

The Committee is satisfied that the quantum of the non-audit services provided by BDO is such that the objectivity and independence 
of the external auditor had not been compromised during their tenure. 

Tony Alves  

Chairman of the Audit Committee 
31 March 2020 

 
 
 
55 

GOVERNANCE 

Directors' remuneration report 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Introduction 

On behalf of the Board, I am pleased to present our Remuneration Report for the year ended 31 December 2019, my first as Chairman of 
the Remuneration Committee.  

During 2019 the Remuneration Committee has reviewed remuneration across the Group, adopting a fit-for-purpose approach that 
ensures that the necessary talent and skills are available at all levels of the Group in each of the locations in which it operates. 

More specifically the Remuneration Committee has undertaken a number of significant activities, including reviewing the 
remuneration of the Chairman, the Non-Executive Director’s, the Chief Executive (the Company's sole Executive Director) and senior 
executives,  updating the KPI’s and reward structures for key staff and implementing additional remuneration for technical staff who 
have skills that are particularly in demand. 

The Remuneration Committee has a full agenda, ensuring that the Directors' Remuneration Policy and remuneration structures for its 
Executive Director, Non-Executive Directors and senior executives remain in line with market trends and governance development. 
The Remuneration Committee annually examines the evolution of remuneration practices and policy for Executive Directors, Non-
Executive Directors and senior executives of the Company. 

The Company’s existing Directors' Remuneration Policy has applied since 1 January 2015, having been initially approved by 
shareholders at the 2014 AGM and re-instated at the AGM in 2017. This policy will expire this year and at the upcoming AGM, currently 
expected to take place on 12 June 2020, the Remuneration Committee will put forward a new Directors' Remuneration Policy for 
approval, which (if approved) shall apply from the date of the AGM (the "New Policy"). The New Policy will be a continuation of the 
existing Remuneration Policy, albeit that it will be updated to reflect the new requirements introduced by the new UK Corporate 
Governance Code 2018 (the "Code") and changes to the legislative framework. The New Policy is disclosed on pages 64 to 71 and a 
summary of the changes can be found in the "Looking Ahead" section noted below.  

Reward principles 

The principles of the Company’s remuneration policy are to: 

  pay an appropriate level of total remuneration in relation to Group and individual performance and with reference to peer group 

companies in order to attract, retain and motivate individuals with the appropriate skills and capabilities;  

  ensure that there is an appropriate link between performance and reward;  

  award annual bonuses which reflect the achievement of short term financial and strategic objectives as well as personal 

performance; and 

  maintain the ability to foster long-term strategic thinking and to align the executive directors with shareholders through awards 

granted under the Performance Share Plan (PSP) that vest over several years. 

Each element of remuneration has a specific role in achieving the objectives of the remuneration policy and aligning the interests of 
Executive Directors with the interests of shareholders. The combined potential remuneration ensures that the balance of the executive 
remuneration package includes significant at risk performance pay. 

More than 95% of Group staff are based outside of the UK, primarily in the Ukraine and Russia. The Remuneration Committee takes 
into account remuneration conditions elsewhere in the Company, and particularly for those employees based in the UK, in formulating 
the Executive Directors' remuneration policy. 

Board Changes 

On 23 May 2019 Hans Jochum Horn and Adrian Coates stood down from the Company’s Board of Directors at the 2019 Annual General 
Meeting and were not reappointed. During the meeting, Victor Gladun, General Director of the Company's main operating subsidiary, 
Poltava Petroleum Company (‘PPC’), was appointed as an Executive Director of the Company.  

Following the AGM, Christian Bukovics and Andrey Shtyrba tendered their resignations as Non-Executive Directors of the Company 
and left the Board at the end of their three months' notice period, on 22 August 2019. 

Until 23 May 2019 the Remuneration Committee comprised Andrey Shtyrba (as Chairman), Christian Bukovics, Hans Jochum Horn and 
Michael Bakunenko. From 23 May 2019 until 22 August 2019 the Remuneration Committee comprised Andrey Shtyrba (as Chairman), 
Christian Bukovics and Michael Bakunenko. From 22 August until 16 September there were no independent directors and the 
Company was not able to form a Remuneration Committee compliant with the Code.  

On 16 September 2019 three independent Non-Executive Directors joined the Board and on 20 September 2019 a Remuneration 
Committee comprising three independent Non-Executive Directors (Dr Rashid Javanshir (Chairman), Tony Alves and Charles 
Valceschini) was formed. The Chairman did not have at least 12 month’s experience on a remuneration committee prior to his 
appointment as Chairman of the Committee as recommended by the Code. The Board however took into account the size of the Group, 
the existing remuneration structure and Dr Javanshir’s general management experience and considered him well suited to the role. 

There were no Directors appointed as Executive Directors prior to 23 May 2019. On 23 May 2019, Victor Gladun was appointed as an 
Executive Director of the Company at the Annual General meeting and on 20 September he was additionally appointed as the CEO of 
the JKX Group. Victor Gladun does not receive any board or committee fees in addition to his i) salary (as set out in section 2 below) in 
relation to his role as CEO of the Company and Group; and ii) and his other executive roles including as General Director of PPC. The 

 
56 

GOVERNANCE 

Directors' remuneration report 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Remuneration Committee considers that the CEO’s remuneration is appropriate and reflects input from a benchmarking study 
conducted by h2glenfern, specialist remuneration consultants. 

Remuneration and discretion in 2019  

Details of the remuneration decisions for the reporting year are covered in the Annual Report on Remuneration below.  

As discussed in the Chairman and CEO’s reports, the Group’s performance in 2019 was strong with an increase in production volumes 
and profitability despite difficult trading conditions and a declining Ukrainian gas price. As a result, the Remuneration Committee 
concluded that Victor Gladun had met the KPI’s agreed with the previous board in his capacity as General Director of PPC at the 
beginning of 2019 and awarded him an annual bonus of $382,000 for his performance in the 2019 financial year. No other bonus 
payments or incentives (including any share options or awards in the Company or Group) were paid to Victor Gladun. More information 
about the level of bonus awarded can be found in the later sections of this Remuneration Report.  

The Remuneration Committee aims to ensure that total remuneration is set at an appropriate level relative to its peer group 
comparator companies, those being UK-based oil and gas companies which are primarily quoted on the London Stock Exchange or AIM, 
and it has sought advice from specialist, independent remuneration consultants in doing so. The main components of remuneration for 
Executive Directors and senior management are basic annual salary, pension and benefits (including non-contributory health 
insurance and life assurance) and an annual bonus scheme linked to short-term financial and strategic objectives. 

Board fees for Non-Executive Directors were reduced in 2019 in line with market comparators in the light of a benchmarking exercise 
carried out by Pearl Meyer, specialist remuneration consultants, and to reflect the Non-Executive Directors’ reduced time commitment 
following Victor Gladun's appointments in May and September 2019. The Non-Executive Director (Michael Bakunenko) who was not 
independent had previously waived his board fees with effect from 22 March 2018 and ceased to be a member of the Remuneration 
Committee on 20 September 2019.  

The Remuneration Committee considers that the remuneration of the sole Executive Director and the Non-Executive Directors 
operated as intended in 2019 in terms of quantum and Company performance.  

Looking ahead 

The current Directors' Remuneration Policy will expire this year and we are seeking your support and approval for the new 
remuneration policy which is intended to apply for three performance years from the date of the 2020 AGM. As noted above, it is 
intended that the New Policy will be a continuation of the previous Directors' Remuneration Policy and the sole Executive Director’s 
salary will remain unchanged as a result of the approval of the New Policy. The new remuneration policy reflects the following limited 
changes to the existing policy: 

a)   malus and clawback provisions may apply to the annual bonus award, in line with the FRC's best practice guidance; 

b)   shareholding guidelines  apply post-cessation of employment as set out on page 68, at the lower of the shareholding guidelines and 

the executive director's actual shareholding on the date that he/she leaves employment. Please see page 68 for more details; 

c)  any PSP awards will be subject to total holding and vesting period of 5 years from grant; 

d)  any PSP awards may be subject to enhanced malus and clawback provisions, in line with the FRC's guidance. 

The Remuneration Committee believes that the New Policy will continue to strike the right balance between generating sustainable 
success for the Group and for our shareholders and rewarding exceptional performance of our Executive Director, senior management 
and NEDs. The Remuneration Committee considers that the New Policy is appropriate in the light of the benchmarking studies carried 
out in 2019 by Pearl Meyer (in relation to the Chairman and Non-Executive Director’s fees) and h2glenfern (in relation to the CEO’s 
remuneration) and the challenges and opportunities that the Group faces.  

The Group is determined to foster trust and open dialogue between its staff and the Board in all governance matters, including 
executive pay. Similarly, in designing the New Policy, the Remuneration Committee considered the incentive opportunity awarded to 
the Group's workforce. All UK employees are eligible to receive an annual pension contribution equivalent to 15% of base salary, on the 
same basis as the Executive Director, and life assurance, income protection and private medical cover. The Executive Director receives 
the same vacation allowance as employees in the Ukraine, his principal work location and participates in the annual bonus on a similar 
basis to other employees (albeit that the performance weightings and opportunities within the annual bonus plan will vary depending 
on role, tenure, seniority and individual performance). 

Principles of Remuneration 

The Remuneration Committee strives to ensure that the Directors' remuneration attracts and retains the best talent, fosters 
sustainable growth and preserves the flexibility to change to market conditions and trends. The following principles have been 
considered when determining our Directors' remuneration and in designing the New Policy:  

Clarity - The Remuneration Committee has adopted a harmonious approach to remuneration. The Group's workforce and its sole 
Executive Director are all eligible to receive an annual cash bonus on the satisfaction of their KPIs, along with their cash salary. In 
2019, the sole Executive Director did not participate in the Company's PSP nor was he awarded any other shares or options to acquire 
shares.  

 
57 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Simplicity - The Remuneration Committee strives to ensure that performance measures are clear and transparent with respect to the 
annual bonus (including the relative weighting thereof). To the extent that any share interests are granted to Executive Directors in 
the future under the Company's PSP or other performance plan arrangement, the Remuneration Committee will disclose the Executive 
Directors' KPIs and relative weightings thereof in the remuneration report for the relevant year.  

Risk - The Remuneration Committee has the discretion to reduce and clawback any awards granted under the PSP and annual bonus 
plan. Please see page 70 below for more information on the application of malus and clawback. Given the inherently discretionary 
nature of the annual bonus scheme, there is no opportunity for inflated payments to Executive Directors due to formulaic outcomes.  

Predictability - the range of possible values of the Executive Director's remuneration alongside the Remuneration Committee's 
discretion to reduce or stop the vesting of awards under the PSP and annual bonus plan is set out in the New Policy (which has been 
detailed on pages 64 - 71).  

Proportionality/Alignment to culture - the Remuneration Committee strives to align the Executive Director's remuneration with the 
short-to-medium term success of the Group through the annual bonus scheme which is linked to the performance of the individual and 
the Group during the previous financial year. Further, the Policy reserves the flexibility with the use of the PSP to link Executive 
Director performance to the long-term growth of the Company if there is a desire in the future from the Company and our shareholders 
to do so. 

Remuneration disclosure 
This Report is split into two parts: the Directors’ Remuneration Policy and the Directors’ annual remuneration report: 

  The Annual Report on Directors’ Remuneration (pages 58 to 64) sets out details of how our existing remuneration policy has been 
applied for the year ended 31 December 2019. This section is subject to an advisory shareholder vote. A summary of the existing 
Remuneration Policy that has applied since 1 January 2015 can be found in the 2014 Annual Report.  

  The new Directors' Remuneration Policy (pages 64 to 71) which shall be subject to a vote at the 2020 AGM and which is intended to 

apply from the date of the 2020 AGM.  

These sections work together to give you full and transparent disclosure of the Company’s approach to Directors’ remuneration during 
2019, 2020 and for the years to come.  

The Remuneration Committee will continue to review the Remuneration Policy for Executive and Non-Executive Directors on a regular 
basis to ensure that it is in compliance with the regulatory framework, market practice and is appropriate in the business environment 
that the Group operates.  

The Report was approved by the Board of Directors and signed on its behalf by 

Dr. Rashid Javanshir 
Chairman of the Remuneration Committee  
31 March 2020 

 
 
 
 
 
 
58 

GOVERNANCE 

Directors' remuneration report 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Work of Remuneration Committee during 2019 

The Company’s Remuneration Committee is responsible for establishing and overseeing the Group's Director and senior executive 
remuneration policy principles, approving remuneration arrangements, exercising oversight of Director remuneration and for 
communicating Director remuneration to its stakeholders.  

A summary of the Remuneration Committee's role and activities during 2019 can be found in the table below:  

Members from 1 Jan 2019 

Role of the Committee 

Activities during 2019 

Establishes the overall principles of 
remuneration for Directors of all Group 
companies  

In addition to regular topics, the 
Committee engaged in specific matters 
including: 

Determines the remuneration of 
Executive Directors and Senior 
Management, communicates this to the 
stakeholders in the annual report 

Recommends the participation in, and 
operation of, the Company’s long-term 
incentive plans. 

The full terms of reference are available 
from the Company’s website 

  Review and approval of performance 
targets for the 2019/20 Annual Bonus 
Scheme, and 

  Review the application and 
appropriateness of current 
remuneration policies. 

  Setting of Non-executive Directors fee 

levels and Executive Director 
remuneration. 

Dr. Rashid Javanshir (as Chairman) - 
appointed 20 September 2019 

Charles Valceschini - appointed 20 
September 2019 

Tony Alves- appointed 20 September 
2019 

Michael Bakunenko – appointed 8 
October 2018, resigned as a member of 
the Committee on 20 September 2019 

Andrey Shtyrba (as Chairman) - 
appointed 11 December 2017, resigned  
22 August 2019 

Christian Bukovics – appointed  
9 February 2018, resigned 22 August 
2019 

Hans Jochum Horn - appointed 
11 December 2017, stood down 23 May 
2019 

Membership and process 

Members   

From  

Dr. Rashid Javanshir (Chairman) 

20 September 2019 

20 September 2019 

20 September 2019 

To 

present 

present 

present 

Tony Alves 

Charles Valceschini 

Michael Bakunenko 

Andrey Shtyrba  

Christian Bukovics 

Hans Jochum Horn 

8 October 2018 

20 September 2019  

11 December 2017 

22 August 2019 

9 February 2018 

22 August 2019 

11 December 2017 

23 May 2019 

Number of meetings 
in 2019 -
Attendance/Eligibility 

2/2 

2/2 

2/2 

1/1 

1/1 

1/1 

1/1 

Dr. Rashid Javanshir, Charles Valceschini and Tony Alves joined the Board as independent Non-Executive Directors on 16 September 
2019 and were appointed to the Remuneration Committee on 20 September 2019. Dr. Rashid Javanshir was appointed as Chairman of 
the Remuneration Committee on 20 September 2019. This is Dr. Rashid Javanshir’s first time serving on a Remuneration Committee. 
Although the Code recommends that a Chairman has at least 12 months experience on a Remuneration Committee before being 
appointed as Chair, the Board took into account the size of the Group, the existing remuneration structure and Dr Javanshir’s general 
management experience and considered him well suited to the role. 

Between 22 August and 20 September 2019 the Board did not have a Remuneration Committee as a result of the Board restructure.  

The Remuneration Committee meets at least twice a year to assist the Board in determining the remuneration arrangements and 
contracts of the Directors and senior employees. The Remuneration Committee met three  times during 2019.  

During 2019, no member of the Remuneration Committee had any personal financial interest and no conflicts of interests arise from 
cross-directorships or day-to-day involvement in running the Group. No Director plays a part in any decision regarding his/her own 
remuneration. 

 
 
 
59 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Advisors to the Remuneration Committee 

Members of the Remuneration Committee provide valuable input in shaping the remuneration practice and polices for Executive 
Directors. Similarly the Remuneration Committee also seeks internal input from other members of the Board in determining Executive 
Remuneration and assessing its appropriateness.  

In addition, during the year, the Remuneration Committee received advice and information from Pearl Meyer and h2glenfern, 
specialist remuneration consultants with experience of peer companies in the same sector in order to ensure that the Non-Executive 
Directors’ fees and the CEO’s remuneration package remained appropriate and market related. Both were appointed as an independent 
remuneration consultant following a tender process conducted in 2019. The aggregate amount of the fees paid to Pearl Meyer and h2 
glenfern for advice to the Remuneration Committee during 2019 amounted to £11,400.  

The Remuneration Committee is satisfied that the advice they have received was objective and independent and was free of any 
conflict in interest.  

Statement of voting at General Meeting  

At the Annual General Meeting held on 23 May 2019, the Directors’ Remuneration Report received the following votes from 
shareholders: 

For 

Against 

Total votes cast (for and against, excluding withheld votes) 

Votes witheld1 

Total votes (for, against and withheld) 

Total number of votes  

% of votes cast 

99,778,459 

30,381 

99,808,840 

47,289,211 

147,098,051 

99.97% 

0.03% 

100 % 

47% 

1  A withheld vote is not a vote in law and is not counted in the calculation of votes cast “for” and “against” a resolution. 

Single figure of total remuneration 

The table below sets out a single figure for the total remuneration received by each Director of the Company in respect of their 
employment with the Company’s Group (defined as the Company and PPC and YGE, being the only entities in the Group that have any 
employees) for the financial years ended 31 December 2018 and 31 December 2019. Since 28 January 2016, all Directors' remuneration 
was rebased to US Dollars (the Group’s reporting currency).  

Single figure of total remuneration for Executive Directors (audited) 

The table below sets out a single figure for the total remuneration received by each Executive Director for the year ended 31 December 
2019 since his appointed as CEO and the Company's sole Executive Director on 23 May 2019. In 2019, the Executive Director’s contract 
was settled in its Ukrainian Hryvna equivalent. Figures in this Report are disclosed in US Dollars (the Group’s reporting currency). 
Amounts paid were translated at the National Bank of Ukraine monthly average exchange rates in accordance with the Group’s foreign 
exchange policy.  

Salary and fees 

Benefits3 

Annual 
Bonus4 

Pension5 

$’000 

$’000 

$’000 

$’000 

2019 

Executive Director 

Victor Gladun  

Chief Executive Officer1 

General Director 

Total 

33 

2612 

294 

- 

- 

- 

382  

382 

- 

- 

Total 

$’000 

331 

643 

676 

1  This represents additional salary received following the appointment of Victor Gladun as a Chief Executive Officer from 20 September 2019 and is a prorated proportion of his  

additional salary payable as CEO  of $120,000 per annum  together with separate remuneration in his role as General Director of PPC.   
Salary: amount earned in 2019  by Victor Gladun in his capacity as General Director of PPC    following his appointment as an Executive Director on 23rd May 2019 

2 
3  Benefits: the taxable value of benefits received in the year, including life assurance and private medical cover are negligible. 
4  Annual Bonus: this is the total cash bonus earned based on performance for the 2019 calendar year and paid in Q1 2020. 
5  Pension: annual contribution by the Group to directors’ pension plans or cash in lieu. Victor Gladun will receive an amount which is 15% of his base salary, which is line with the 

rest of the UK workforce rate, from 1/1/2020.  

6  Victor Gladun does not receive any board or committee fees in his capacity as Executive Director of the Company or for any other executive role that he holds in the Group.  

Victor Gladun has not received any other benefit from the Group (including any share awards). As no shares have been awarded, no amount of Victor Gladun's remuneration has 
been subject to any share price appreciation or depreciation. No aspect of Victor Gladun's remuneration has been deferred.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
60 

GOVERNANCE 

Directors' remuneration report 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Fixed - cash salary 

Discretionary - Annual bonus award 

The Company did not have any Executive Directors prior to 23 May 2019. On 23 May 
Victor Gladun was appointed as an Executive Director of the Company at an Annual 
General meeting. Victor Gladun has held the position of CEO from 20 September 2019 
and was paid a proportion of his annual CEO salary starting from this date. He does 
not receive any board or committee fees in addition to his salary for his CEO and 
other executive roles including as General Director of PPC.  

The Executive Director’s basic salary and the other fixed elements of pay are 
determined by the Remuneration Committee on appointment and then reviewed at 
the beginning of each year and within the parameters of the remuneration policy. 
The individual salary and benefits of the Executive Director were set taking into 
account individual performance and market factors, with reference to independent 
and objective research conducted by h2glenfern that provides up-to-date 
information on a comparator group of UK companies operating in the independent oil 
and gas sector.  

Victor Gladun received an annual bonus of $240,000 for the 2018 calendar year (paid 
in 2019) in respect of his role as General Director of PPC. This was calculated by 
reference to KPI’s agreed by the previous board for the 2018 year. He received an 
annual bonus of $382,000 in Q1 2020 in relation to his performance in 2019 calendar 
year. 

Pension 

The Company will make a contribution equivalent to 15% of basic salary for the 
Executive Director with effect from 1/1/20.  

Taxable benefits 

At his option, the Executive Directors may either have contributions of the same 
amounts made to his personal pension schemes or cash in lieu of pension at the stated 
rate, or a combination of pension contributions and cash in lieu at the stated rate, 
subject to normal statutory deductions. 

Benefits provided to the Executive Director include life assurance, which is also 
provided for senior managers, for a sum assured of four times base salary and private 
medical cover is offered to all Company employees and provides medical cover for 
them and their dependents, on a non-contributory basis. 

Notes to table 
There was no Executive Director appointed in 2018. 

Basis for determining Executive Director's annual bonus award 

The annual cash bonus award reflects the Remuneration Committee's assessment of the extent to which his financial and non-financial 
KPIs were achieved.  

The Annual Bonus Scheme for the 2019 year applied to certain senior management including senior staff in PPC and Yuzhgazenergie 
(‘YGE’). The scheme is discretionary and annual awards are not pensionable. The Remuneration Committee considered Victor Gladun's 
performance to have fully met his KPI’s and awarded him 100% of his maximum opportunity under his bonus award for 2019. 

The annual bonus scheme payment for the 2018 year awarded to Victor Gladun in Q1 2019 did not relate to his work as Chief Executive 
Officer or as an Executive Director of the Company but was based upon his 2018 KPI’s and achievements in his capacity as General 
Director of PPC. This annual cash bonus award was paid prior  to Victor Gladun's appointment as an Executive Director of the Group and 
therefore, in accordance with the legislative framework, we have not reported on the assessment of the bonus in this report.  

Annual bonuses for the 2019 year paid in January 2020 will be further disclosed in next year's report (including the relevant KPIs and 
reporting thereof). 

Single total figure of remuneration for Non-Executive Directors (audited) 

The table below sets out a single figure for the total remuneration received by each Non-Executive Director of the Company for the 
financial years ended 31 December 2018 and 31 December 2019.  

All Non-Executive Directors' remuneration was rebased from GBP to US Dollars from 28 January 2016 (the Group’s reporting currency). 
However, in accordance with the letters of appointment, Dr. Rashid Javanshir, Tony Alves, Adrian Coates and Christian Bukovics 
director fees were settled in its Sterling equivalent at the rate set in accordance with the Group’s foreign exchange policy.  

 
 
61 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

$’000 

2019 

2018 

2019 

2018 

Fees 

Total remuneration 

Non Executive Directors 

Charles Valceschini 

Tony Alves  

Dr Rashid Javanshir  

Michael Bakunenko 

Former Non Executive Directors 

Hans Jochum Horn 

Andrey Shtyrba 

Adrian Coates 

Christian Bukovics 

Vladimir Tatarchuk 

Vladimir Rusinov 

53 

31 

26 

- 

110 

96 

62 

87 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

2 

260 

142 

149 

113 

2 

2 

53 

31 

26 

- 

110 

96 

62 

87 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

2 

260 

142 

149 

113 

2 

2 

465 

670 

465 

670 

The Non-Executive Directors’ fees are subject to an overall cap of £500,000 per annum, excluding exceptional fees for additional work 
under the Company’s Articles of Association. In order to ensure compliance with this cap the Non-executive Directors’ waived certain of 
their fees in December 2018.  

Changes to Non-Executive Directors' remuneration during 2019 

The following Non-Executive Directors had been appointed as such during the year: 

Non-Executive 

Date of contract 

Term of contract 

Notice period 

Date of termination1 

Charles Valceschini 

16 September 2019 

Dr Rashid Javanshir 

16 September 2019 

Tony Alves 

16 September 2019 

Michael Bakunenko 

8 December 2017 

Hans Jochum Horn 

24 October 2017 

Adrian Coates 

8 December 2017 

Andrey Shtyrba 

24 October 2017 

Christian Bukovics 

9 February 2018 

3 years 

3 years 

3 years 

3 years 

3 years 

3 years 

3 years 

3 years 

3 months 

3 months 

3 months 

3 months 

3 months 

3 months 

3 months 

3 months 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

23 May 2019 

23 May 2019 

22 August 2019 

22 August 2019 

1  On 23 May 2019, Hans Jochum Horn and Adrian Coates stood down from the Board and were not reappointed at the  Annual General Meeting of the Company. Following the 

meeting, Christian Bukovics and Andrey Shtyrba tendered their resignations as directors of the Company and left the Board at the end of their three months' notice period, on 
22 August 2019. 

All Non-Executive Directors’ letters of appointment automatically terminate if a number of events occur, including material breach, 
being disqualified from acting as a director or ceasing to act as a director for other reasons. Non-Executive Directors are appointed for 
an initial term of three years and notice periods are three months for either the Company or individual. No compensation is payable 
under the terms of the letters of appointment and within the remit of the remuneration policy in force for early termination.  

The independent Non-Executive Directors are paid a base fee for carrying out their duties and responsibilities as Directors, fees for 
membership of board committees and, where applicable, chairmanship of each of the remuneration, nomination and audit committees.  

The fees were reduced in 2019 from the level introduced in 2013 and were based on a per annum rate (in Sterling) which was compared 
to published material concerning Non-Executive Director fees in similar size companies and comparable companies in the sector.  

All Non-Executive Directors’ remuneration was stated and paid in Sterling until 27 January 2016. From 28 January 2016, all Directors' 
remuneration was rebased to US Dollars (the Group’s reporting currency).  

These fees were reviewed at the 2019 year end and no increase has been awarded from their 2019 level. Non-Executive Directors’ fees 
for 2019 and 2020 are as follows: 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
62 

GOVERNANCE 

Directors' remuneration report 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Position1 

2019 

2020 

% decrease from 
2019 to 2020 

Chairman of the Company 

$250,000 

$180,000 

Board membership fee 

Senior Independent Director 

Committee chairman - Audit 

Committee chairman - Remuneration 

Committee chairman - Nomination 

Committee membership – Audit 

Committee membership – Remuneration 

Committee membership – Nomination 

$120,000 

$15,000 

$15,000 

$15,000 

$15,000 

$7,500 

$7,500 

$7,500 

$60,000 

$15,000 

$15,000 

$15,000 

$15,000 

$7,500 

$7,500 

$7,500 

28 

50 

nil 

nil 

nil 

nil 

nil 

nil 

nil 

1  These payments relate solely to the position referred to and where a Non-Executive Director holds more than one position he will receive payment for each such position held.  

Non-Executive Directors cannot participate in any of the Company’s share schemes nor are they eligible to join the Company’s pension 
benefit arrangements. Non-Executive directors who were not independent waived their fees for committee membership with effect 
from 23 March 2018, having previously agreed to waive their board membership fees.  

Scheme interests awarded in 2019 (audited) 

Whilst the Company does still have  one long-term incentive plan, the 2010 Performance Share Plan (‘PSP’) which was approved by 
shareholders at the 2010 and 2014 Annual General Meetings, no grants have been made to Directors under the PSP (or otherwise) 
during 2019.  

Percentage change in CEO remuneration 

The table below shows the percentage change in the CEO's remuneration from the prior year compared to the average percentage 
change in remuneration for UK employees.  

The CEO’s remuneration includes base salary, taxable benefits and annual bonus. The analysis excludes part-time employees and is 
based on a consistent set of all UK employees, i.e. the same individuals appear in the 2018 and 2019 populations. A comparison with UK 
employees is used as the most likely recruitment location for senior staff in a premium listed company; all other Group staff are 
employed in Ukraine and Russia which have different economies from the UK driving their remuneration levels and practices.  

Base salary 

Taxable benefits 

Annual bonus 

Total 

2019 

$’000 

331 

- 

382 

415 

CEO 

20182 
$’000 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

% change 

2018 - 2019 

100%3 

N/A 

N/A 

100% 

All UK employees 

% change  

2018 - 2019 

100% 

N/A 

N/A 

100% 

1  This relates solely to the CEO remuneration received by Victor Gladun in the period from his appointment as CEO on 20 September 2019 until year end and does not include any 

payment he receives in relation to his role as General Director of PPC. his role as CEO of PPC was received in Q1 2019, prior to his appointment.  

2  No amounts were received by a CEO in 2018, and Victor Gladun was not appointed as CEO until 20 September 2019.  
3 

100% increase is due to the fact that prior to 23 May 2019, the Company did not have an Executive Director.  

On 23 May 2019 Victor Gladun was appointed as an Executive Director of the Company at an Annual General meeting. There were no 
Executive Directors appointed as Directors in 2018. 

Payments for loss of office (audited) 

Executive Director Service Contract severance payments 
There were no Executive Directors who left the business during the year.  

Non-executive Director – Exit payments  
On 23 May 2019 Hans Jochum Horn and Adrian Coates stood down form the Board and were not reappointed at the Annual General 
Meeting of the Company. No additional payments were made to them. Following the Annual General Meeting, Andrey Shtyrba and 
Christian Bukovics, tendered their resignations and such resignations were accepted by the Board, and they left the Board at the end of 
their three months' notice period, on 22 August 2019. No additional payments were made to them. 

Payments to past directors (audited) 
There were no payments made to past directors in 2019. 

 
 
 
 
 
63 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Statement of directors' shareholdings and share interests (audited) 

In 2010, the Remuneration Committee introduced an executive share ownership guidelines of 100% of basic salary for Executive 
Directors which can be built up over a reasonable period of time from the date of appointment.  

Victor Gladun, as the sole Executive Director, does not hold any Shares or options (vested or unvested) in the Company as at 31 
December 2019 and has not been awarded any Shares or options as part of his remuneration in 2020 between 1 January 2020 and the 
date of this document, nor has he acquired any Shares in the Group. There were no Executive Directors appointed in 2019 prior to 
Victor Gladun’s appointment on 23 May 2019.  

At 31 December 2019, no Non-Executive Director held any Shares or options (vested or unvested) in the Company. Since 31 December 
2019, there have been no changes in the Directors’ interests in shares of the Company. 

Relative importance of spend on pay 

The table below shows shareholder distributions (i.e. dividends and share buybacks) and total employee pay expenditure for the 
financial years ended 31 December 2019 and 31 December 2018, along with the percentage change in both. 

All-employee remuneration 

Distributions to shareholders 

2019  

$’000 

8,741 

- 

2018  

Year-on-year  

$’000 

12,502 

– 

change 

(30)% 

N/A 

1  All-employee remuneration includes total staff costs for the Group and is converted into US$ in accordance with Group foreign exchange policy 
2  No dividends or other distributions were made to shareholders in 2018 or 2019. 
3  No other significant distributions and payments or other uses of profit or cash-flow were made in 2018 or 2019.  

Performance graph and table  

The following graph shows the Company’s TSR performance compared to the performance of the FTSE All-Share and FTSE All-Share Oil 
& Gas Producers indices over a 10-year period. These indices have been chosen as suitable broad comparators against which the 
Company’s shareholders may judge their relative returns given that the Company is a member of the FTSE All-Share and continue to be 
part of the FTSE All-Share Oil & Gas Producers Index. 

JKX vs FTSE All-Share Index and FTSE All-Share Oil & Gas Producers Index 

75.00%

50.00%

25.00%

0.00%

-25.00%

-50.00%

-75.00%

-100.00%

JKX

FTSE All-Share Index

FTSE All-Share Oil & Gas Producers Index

The table below details the Company's Chief Executive Officer's total remuneration over the 10-year period. An investment of £100 in 
the Company on 31 December 2009 was worth £8.7at 31 December 2019 (same investment on 31 December 2008 was worth £.14.0 at 
31 December 2018).  

 
 
 
 
 
 
64 

GOVERNANCE 

Directors' remuneration report 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

CEO single figure of remuneration -  
Paul Davies ($’000) 
CEO single figure of remuneration –  
Tom Reed ($’000) 
CEO single figure of remuneration –  
Victor Gladun ($’000)  
Total CEO single figure of 
remuneration ($’000) 
Bonus award - % against maximum 
opportunity 

2010 

2011 

2012 

2013 

2014 

2015 

2016 

2017 

2018 

2019 

818 

832 

983 

1,141 

1,043 

1,322 

62 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

1,261 

325 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

N/A 

676 

818 

832 

983 

1,141 

1,043 

1,322 

1,323 

325 

N/A 

676 

40% 

43% 

33% 

62% 

33 % 

86% 

70% 

0% 

N/A 

57% 

1 

From 28 January 2016, the CEO’s remuneration was rebased to its equivalent US Dollar amount at that time. For financial years 2010 to 2015, the CEO’s single figure 
remuneration amounts, which in previous Remuneration Reports were quoted in Sterling, have been converted into their US Dollar equivalent in each year using the following 
average Sterling: US Dollar exchange rates as follows: $2010: £1:$1.546; 2011: £1:$1.604; 2012: £1:$1.585; 2013: £1:$1.565; 2014: £1:$1.648; 2015:£1: $1.529. In 2019, the 
Executive Director’s contract was settled in its Ukrainian Hryvna equivalent. Amounts paid were converted at the National Bank of Ukraine monthly average exchange rates. 

2  No cash bonus award was received by the CEO in 2017.  
3  The Company did not have a CEO in 2018 (or any other Executive Director).  
4  No CEO of the Company has ever been awarded an award under the Company's Performance Share Plan or any other deferred share bonus or salary.  
5  Victor Gladun did not receive any bonus payment in 2019 after his appointment as CEO on 29 September 2020.  
6 

Single figure remuneration is calculated on the same basis as set out on page 59 and includes both remuneration actually received as CEO in 2019 and also as General Director 
of PPC. The figure of $676,000 includes the bonus award made in Q1 2020 in relation to the 2019 financial year. 

Summary of policy changes and 2020 implementation 

The table below summarises the key components of our proposed remuneration framework, illustrating how it differs from the 
existing policy and how we intend to implement the New Policy in 2020. Full details of the New Policy are set out on pages 64 – 71. 

As the table below illustrates, the New Policy is intended to be a continuation of the existing policy that was approved by shareholders 
at the 2014 AGM and which was re-instated at the 2017 AGM. The full policy, as approved by shareholders, can be found on pages 125-
133 of the 2013 Annual Report, a copy of which can be found on the Company’s website at http://www.jkx.co.uk/investor-
centre/investor-download-centre.aspx 

Fixed 

Salary 

Pension 

Existing Policy 

New Policy and 2020 implementation 

Fixed remuneration set out in the 
service contract, to attract and 
retain talent, which reflects the 
role, skills and responsibilities.  

An executive director may receive 
payment under different contracts 
in relation to different roles (e.g. 
acting as Group CEO and General 
Director of an operating unit), but 
receives no other fees in 
relationship to directorship of any 
group company or membership of 
any Board committee. 

An Executive Director receives a 
payment in lieu of pension of 15% of 
base salary per annum, in line with 
the pension contributions for UK 
workforce. 

No change to the Policy.  

An Executive Director’s basic salary and the other 
fixed elements of pay are determined by the 
Remuneration Committee on appointment and then 
reviewed at the beginning of each year and within the 
parameters of the remuneration policy. The individual 
salary and benefits of the Executive Director were set 
taking into account individual performance and 
market factors, with reference to independent and 
objective research that provides up-to-date 
information on a comparator group of UK companies 
operating in the independent oil and gas sector.  

No change. 

At their option, Executive Directors may either have 
contributions of the same amounts made to their 
personal pension schemes or cash in lieu of pension at 
the stated rate, or a combination of pension 
contributions and cash in lieu at the stated rate, 
subject to normal statutory deductions. 

Benefits 

Life assurance, private medical 
insurance and other benefits at the 
Remuneration Committee's 
discretion. 

No change. 

 
 
 
 
 
65 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Discretionary 

Annual bonus 

Existing Policy 

New Policy and 2020 implementation 

To align the executive director with 
the short-term and medium-term 
success of the Group. 

Enhanced malus and clawback provisions may  apply 
and may be exercised at the discretion of the 
Remuneration Committee. No other change. 

PSP Award 

The Remuneration Committee has 
the discretion to defer the annual 
bonus into shares to be held for one 
year.  

KPIs are set by the Remuneration 
Committee at the start of each year. 
The measures selected may vary 
each year depending on business 
context and strategy, and measures 
will be weighted appropriately 
according to business priorities. 
Under normal circumstances, 
financial measures will make up at 
least half of the total bonus 
opportunity. 

The Remuneration Committee has 
the ability to grant awards of nil-
cost options annually to executive 
directors, conditional on group 
performance.  

Maximum opportunity: 150% base 
salary. 

Previous Measures and weightings: 

  25% TSR; 

  25% Earnings per share; 

  25% Other financial measures 

(e.g. ROCE, Profit before tax, cash 
resources); 

  25% Strategic and operational 
measures (e.g. production, 
reserves). 

Three-year vesting period. 

No PSP award was made in 2019. 

PSP awards granted will be subject to a further two-
year holding period after vesting (total vesting and 
holding period of 5 years).  

No PSP award is intended to be made in 2020. 

To the extent that any PSP award is granted, full 
disclosure of the KPIs and relative weightings will be 
disclosed in following annual report.  

Enhanced malus and clawback provisions will apply 
and may be exercised at the discretion of the 
Remuneration Committee. 

Other 

Shareholding 
guidelines 

100% of base salary. 

NED fees 

Fees reflect experience and skill of 
the individuals and responsibilities 
and time commitments for the role. 

The lower of the shareholding requirement or the 
Executive Director's actual shareholding will be 
maintained for two years post-employment, releasing 
on a phased basis: 50% after year 1 and 50% year two.  

No change. 

Fee levels will be next reviewed during 2020, with any 
increase effective 1 January 2021. It is expected that 
increases to Non-Executive Director fee levels will be 
in line with salaried UK-based employees over the life 
of the New Policy. 

Directors' Remuneration Policy 

The New Policy will be put to shareholders for approval at the AGM to be held on 12 June 2020. Subject to approval, the New Policy is 
intended to apply for three years from the date of the AGM. The Remuneration Committee is satisfied that the New Policy is in the best 
interests of shareholders and does not promote excessive risk-taking. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
66 

GOVERNANCE 

Directors' remuneration report 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

The New Policy is a continuation of the existing remuneration policy, subject to the following differences: 

a)  malus and clawback provisions may  apply to the annual bonus award, which may be exercised at the Remuneration Committee's 

discretion, in line with the FRC's best practice guidance; 

b)  Shareholding guidelines apply post-cessation of employment, at the lower of the shareholding guideline and the executive 

director's actual shareholding on the date that he/she leaves employment; 

c)  any PSP awards will be subject to total holding and vesting period of 5 years from grant; 

d)  any PSP awards  may be subject to enhanced malus and clawback provisions. 

Future Policy Table  

Base salary 

Purpose and link to strategy 

Operation 

To attract and retain the best talent by ensuring base salaries reflect individual performance, 
market factors and the individual's role, responsibilities and skills. 

Base salaries are reviewed annually, with reference to the individual’s role, experience and 
performance; salary levels are referable to relevant UK sector comparators, and the range of 
salary increases applied across the Group. 

Maximum Opportunity 

Any base salary increases are applied in line with the outcome of the annual review. 

Different increases may be awarded at the Remuneration Committee's discretion in instances 
such as: 

a) where there has been a significant increase in the size, value or complexity of the Group; 
b) there has been a change in the role/responsibility; 
c) the incumbent executive director is paid below market comparators. 

Performance metrics 

Business and individual performance are considered in setting base salary.  

Comparator companies used to assess market pay competitiveness have historically included UK-based oil and gas companies listed on 
the London Stock Exchange or AIM. The Remuneration Committee reviews comparator companies periodically to ensure they remain 
appropriate and retains the discretion to adjust the reference group or companies as appropriate. In 2019, h2glenfern, a specialist 
remuneration consultant, was engaged to assist the Remuneration Committee is setting the Executive Director's remuneration and 
conducted a benchmarking exercise to ensure that it remained in line with market norms..   

Pension 

Purpose and link to strategy 

To provide competitive retirement benefits and to encourage long-term saving and planning 
for investment. 

Operation 

The Company makes a contribution to the pension scheme of the individual’s choice.  

At their option, Executive Directors may either have equivalent contributions made to their 
personal pension schemes or cash in lieu of pension or a combination of both. 

Maximum Opportunity 

Executive Directors are eligible to receive an annual contribution equivalent to 15% of base 
salary, in line with the rest of the UK workforce. 

Performance metrics 

Not performance related. 

Benefits 

Purpose and link to strategy 

To provide competitive benefits. 

Operation 

Executive Directors receive benefits which include, but are not limited to, life assurance and 
private medical cover, although can include any such benefits that the Remuneration 
Committee deems appropriate, including (but not limited to) a car or a car allowance and long-
term disability insurance.  

Maximum Opportunity 

Benefits values vary by role and are reviewed periodically relative to market circumstances.  

The cost of the benefits provided changes in accordance with market conditions and 
jurisdiction and will, therefore, determine the maximum amount that would be paid in the 
form of benefits during the life-time of the Policy. The Remuneration Committee retains the 
discretion to approve a higher cost in exceptional circumstances (e.g. relocation) or in 

 
 
67 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

circumstances where factors outside the Company’s control had changed materially (e.g. 
increases in insurance premiums). 

Performance metrics 

Not performance related. 

Annual bonus 

Purpose and link to strategy 

To incentivise the achievement of short-term and medium-term financial and strategic 
objectives on an annual basis 

Operation 

Performance measures, targets and weightings are set at the start of the year according to 
strategic priorities. 

At the end of the year, the Remuneration Committee determines the extent to which the 
targets have been achieved, with any bonus payments delivered in cash. The annual bonus is 
paid at the start of the following financial year (in relation to the executive director's 
performance of the previous year).  

For Executive Directors, the Remuneration Committee has the discretion to mandate the 
deferral of a proportion (up to 100%) of the annual bonus in JKX shares, to be held for a 
minimum of 1 year.  

The annual bonus award (and any deferred shares) may be  subject to malus and clawback 
provisions, which can be exercised at the Remuneration Committee's discretion, in the event 
of material erroneous, misleading data, gross misconduct, misstatement of accounts, serious 
reputational damage, and corporate failure. Please see the notes to the table for more 
information. 

The sale of any deferred shares is subject to meeting shareholding guidelines. 

For Executive Directors, the maximum annual bonus opportunity is 100% of base salary or 
150% of base salary in exceptional circumstances.  

Performance is assessed annually based on challenging and stretch targets for operational, 
organisational, financial and health and safety performance. The measures selected may vary 
each year depending on business context and strategy, and measures will be weighted 
appropriately according to business priorities. Under normal circumstances, financial 
measures will make up at least half of the total bonus opportunity. The targets and relative 
weightings will be disclosed in the annual report following the relevant financial year.  

Payment of any annual bonus award will be subject to a discretionary underpin (including 
individual performance).  

The Remuneration Committee has the discretion to alter the measures and/or targets during 
the performance period if it believes the original measures and/or targets are no longer 
appropriate.  

The Remuneration Committee has discretion to adjust the formulaic bonus outcomes both 
upwards and downwards within the plan limits (including down to zero) to ensure alignment 
of pay with the underlying performance of the business, e.g., in the event of a target being 
significantly missed or unforeseen circumstances outside of management control.  

To incentivise strong long-term financial performance and superior longer term returns to 
shareholders relative to peers and to align the interests of executive directors and 
shareholders. 

The Remuneration Committee has the ability to grant awards of nil-cost options annually to 
Executive Directors, conditional on Group performance over a period of at least three years. 
Shares that vest under the PSP may  then be subject to an additional holding period of up to 
two years.  

The PSP awards may be  subject to malus and clawback provisions, which may be exercised at 
the Remuneration Committee's discretion, in the event of material erroneous, misleading 
data, gross misconduct, misstatement of accounts, serious reputational damage, and 
corporate failure. Please see the notes to the table for more information. 

Opportunity 

Performance metrics 

Performance Share Plan 

Purpose and link to strategy 

Operation 

 
 
 
68 

GOVERNANCE 

Directors' remuneration report 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Opportunity 

Performance metrics 

The sale of vested PSP awards is subject to meeting shareholding guidelines. 

The PSP provides for an award up to a normal aggregate limit of 150% of salary for Executive 
Directors, with an overall limit of 200% of salary in exceptional circumstances. 

Vesting of PSP awards is subject to continued employment and the Company’s performance 
over a 3-year performance period. If no entitlement has been earned at the end of the 
relevant performance period, awards will lapse.  

From 2015, PSP awards are based on a number of financial and strategic measures, which may 
include, but are not limited to:  

  TSR; 

  Earnings per share (‘EPS’);  

  Other financial measures (e.g. ROCE, Profit before tax, cash resources); and  

  Strategic and operational measures (e.g. production, reserves). 

In addition, awards are subject to an underpin such that for any PSP awards to vest, the 
Remuneration Committee must satisfy themselves that health and safety performance has 
been satisfactory over the performance period. Each measure can be applied a weighting of 
between 0% and 50%. Executive Directors will not be rewarded for poor performance. The 
Remuneration Committee has the discretion to adjust the performance measures and 
weightings in advance of making a PSP award to ensure that they continue to be linked to the 
delivery of Company strategy and long-term success of the Company. Performance measures 
and weightings, as well as performance against these, will be disclosed in the Report on 
Remuneration for the relevant year.  

Under each measure, threshold performance will result in up to 25% of maximum vesting for 
that element. The vesting level will increase on a sliding scale to 100% vesting for stretch 
levels of performance. 

Vesting of PSP awards may be deferred in whole or in part for a period of up to two years 
following the end of a three year vesting period.  

As under the annual bonus, the Remuneration Committee has discretion to adjust the 
formulaic PSP outcomes within the PSP limits to ensure alignment of pay with performance, 
i.e. to ensure the outcome is a true reflection of the performance of the Company and the 
individual.  

Shareholding guidelines 

Purpose and link to strategy 

To align Executive Directors with the strategic long term success of the Company. 

Operation 

To the extent that Executive Directors are awarded share options and shares as part of their 
remuneration package, Executive Directors may be required to build up a shareholding in the 
Company over a reasonable period.  

All beneficially owned shares and deferred annual bonus shares and vested PSP awards will 
count towards an individual's shareholding on a net of tax basis (where relevant).  

The lower of the Shareholding guideline (100% of base salary) and the individual's actual 
shareholding will continue post-employment, unless the Remuneration Committee 
determines otherwise (including determining that the Shareholding guidelines shall not 
apply where the Executive Director has voluntarily acquired shares in the Company or 
Group): 

  the shareholding requirement will fall to 50% at the end of year 1; 

  the shareholding requirement will fall to zero after two years. 

Maximum Value 

100% of base salary. 

Performance metrics 

Not performance related. 

 
 
69 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Non-Executive Directors' fees 

Purpose and link to strategy 

Operation 

To attract and retain Non-Executive Directors of the highest calibre with broad commercial 
and other experience relevant to the Company and the Group.  

Fee levels are reviewed annually, with any adjustments effective 1 January in the year 
following review. The fees paid to the Chairman and Non-Executive Directors are determined 
by the Board. 

Additional fees are payable for acting as Senior Independent Director and as Chairman of the 
Audit, Nomination and Remuneration Committees, and for individual membership of such 
committees. 

Fee levels are benchmarked against comparable companies in the sector as well as FTSE-
listed companies of similar size and complexity. Time commitment and responsibility are 
taken into account when reviewing fee levels. 

Opportunity 

Non-Executive Directors’ fee increases are applied in line with the outcome of the annual fee 
review.  

Fee levels will be next reviewed during 2020, with any increase effective 1 January 2021. It is 
expected that increases to Non-Executive Director fee levels will be in line with salaried UK-
based employees over the life of the policy. In the event that there is a material misalignment 
with the market or a change in the complexity, responsibility or time commitment required to 
fulfil a Non-Executive role, the Board has discretion to make an appropriate adjustment to 
the fee level within the maximum level set out under the Policy. 

The maximum amount that may be paid to non-executive directors is £500,000 as set out in 
the Company's Articles of Association.  

Additional remuneration for a non-executive director who performs special services (as 
determined by the Board) as expressly permitted by the Articles of Association of the 
Company is also permitted under this policy.  

Performance metrics 

None 

Non-Executive Directors' expenses 

Purpose and link to strategy 

Operation 

To compensate Non-Executive Directors for expenses incurred in connection with the 
performance of their duties. 

The Company may reimburse Non-Executive directors for any business related costs (such as 
travel costs, accommodation and other subsistence expenses incurred in connection with 
their duties) and any associated tax on these. 

The Remuneration Committee reserves the discretion to reimburse Non-Executive Directors 
for other expenses if it considers that it is appropriate in the circumstances to do so.  

Opportunity 

The maximum amount payable depends on the costs of providing such expenses. 

Performance metrics 

None 

Notes to the future policy table 

Performance measure selection and approach to target setting 
The measures used to calculate the annual bonus are selected annually to reflect the Group's main objectives for the year and reflect 
both financial and non-financial priorities. 

Under the Company's PSP plan, the Remuneration Committee considers the use of TSR to be appropriate since it is dependent on the 
Company's relative long-term share price performance and therefore provides strong alignment with the interests of the Company's 
shareholders. The Remuneration Committee equally considers EPS to be an appropriate measure, since it is the primary internal 
benchmark of long-term financial performance and promotes alignment between management and the Company's shareholders. As 
outlined in the Policy Table above, for future grants of long-term incentives, the Remuneration Committee may decide to include other 
financial, strategic and operational measures in addition to EPS and relative TSR. Such measures would be selected on the basis of their 
relevance to the company's longer term strategy and the Remuneration Committee will provide rationale for their inclusion in the 
Annual Report on Remuneration for the relevant year. 

 
 
 
 
70 

GOVERNANCE 

Directors' remuneration report 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Targets applying to both the annual bonus and PSP awards are reviewed annually, based on a number of internal and external 
reference points. Performance targets are set to be stretching but achievable, with regard to the particular strategic priorities and 
economic environment in a given year.  

Malus and clawback 
At any time prior to the vesting of a PSP award, delivery of any deferred shares pursuant to the annual bonus plan, or payment of a cash 
bonus, the Remuneration Committee may determine that an unvested award may not vest (regardless of whether or not the 
performance conditions have been met). At any time up to three years after the award vests, or a cash payment is paid or shares 
delivered, the Remuneration Committee may determine that the cash bonus or shares, or their equivalent value in cash, shall be 
returned to the Company as a result of misleading financial performance, or a material misstatement in the financial results of the 
Group, a material downturn in the financial performance of the Group, gross misconduct, reputational damage, corporate failure and/or 
if the Remuneration Committee considers that the amount of cash bonus or shares under an award cannot be justified based on the 
financial performance of the Company or performance of the individual.  

Remuneration Committee discretion 
In addition to the malus and clawback provisions noted above, the Policy gives discretion to the Remuneration Committee to override 
formulaic outcomes of the performance assessment in relation to the annual bonus and PSP.  

Recruitment policy: Executive directors  
External appointment 
In cases of hiring or appointing a new Executive Director from outside the Group, the Remuneration Committee may make use of all 
existing components of remuneration, as described on the Policy table above.  

In determining appropriate remuneration structure and levels, the Remuneration Committee will take into consideration all relevant 
factors to ensure that arrangements are in the best interests of both the Group and its shareholders. The Remuneration Committee 
may make an award in respect of a new appointment to ‘buy out' incentive arrangements forfeited on leaving a previous employer, i.e. 
over and above the approach outlined in the table above. In doing so, the Remuneration Committee will consider relevant factors 
including any performance conditions attached to these awards, the likelihood of those conditions being met and the proportion of the 
vesting period remaining. 

Any such ‘buy-out' awards will typically be made under the existing annual bonus and PSP schemes, although in exceptional 
circumstances the Remuneration  Committee may exercise the discretion available under Listing Rule 9.4.2 R to make awards using a 
different structure. Any ‘buy-out' awards would have a fair value no higher than the awards forfeited. 

Internal appointment 
In cases of appointing a new Executive Director by way of internal promotion from within the Group, the Policy will be consistent with 
that for external appointees, as detailed above. Where an individual has contractual commitments made prior to their promotion to 
Executive Director level, the Company will continue to honour these arrangements even in instances where they would not otherwise 
be consistent with the prevailing Executive Director remuneration policy at the time of appointment. 

Recruitment policy: Non-Executive directors 
In recruiting a new Non-Executive Director, the Board will use the Policy as set out in the table above. 

A base fee in line with the prevailing fee schedule would be payable for membership of the Board of Directors, with additional fees 
payable for acting as Senior Independent Non-Executive Director and as Chairman of any of the Audit, Remuneration and Nomination 
Committees, and for individual membership of such Committees. 

The Remuneration Committee considers that external directorships provide the Group's Directors and senior executives with valuable 
experience that is of benefit to the Company, and believes that it is reasonable for the individual Non-Executive Director to retain any 
fees received from external appointments. 

Directors and senior executives may accept appointments outside the Group providing that the Chairman's permission is sought and 
granted. Details of Directors external appointments and the associated fees received are included in the Annual Report on 
Remuneration. 

Service contracts and policy on payment for loss of office  
It is the Remuneration Committee's policy that poor performance should not be rewarded. The table below summarises how variable 
incentives are typically treated in specific circumstances, with the final treatment remaining subject to the Remuneration 
Committee's discretion. 

The current Executive Director's contract is for an indefinite term and has a 6 months’ notice period by either the Company or the 
individual. This would be the normal policy for new appointments.  

 
71 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Annual Bonus 

Reason for leaving 

Timing of vesting/payment 

Calculation of vesting/payment 

Retirement, ill-health, disability, death or 
any other reasons the Remuneration 
Committee may determine in its absolute 
discretion. 

Normal payment date, although the 
Remuneration Committee has discretion to 
accelerate. 

No automatic eligibility for payment. The 
Remuneration Committee may in its 
absolute discretion award a bonus for the 
performance year. Cash bonuses will only 
be paid to the extent that Group and 
personal objectives set at the beginning of 
the year have been achieved. Any resulting 
bonus will be pro-rated for time served 
during the year. 

Change of control. 

Any other reason. 

PSP 

Reason for leaving 

Not applicable. 

No bonus is paid. 

Not applicable. 

Not applicable. 

Timing of vesting 

Calculation of vesting/payment 

Retirement, ill-health, disability, death or 
any other reasons the Remuneration 
Committee may determine in its absolute 
discretion. 

Normal vesting date, although the 
Remuneration Committee has discretion to 
accelerate. 

Death. 

On date of event. 

Change of control. 

On date of event. 

Any outstanding PSP awards will be pro-
rated for time and performance. Note the 
Remuneration Committee may in its 
absolute discretion waive time pro-rating 
of award. 

Any outstanding PSP awards will be pro-
rated for time and performance. Note the 
Remuneration Committee may in its 
absolute discretion waive time pro-rating 
of award. 

Any outstanding PSP awards will be pro-
rated for time and performance. Note the 
Remuneration Committee may in its 
absolute discretion waive time pro-rating 
of award. In the event of a change of 
control, PSP awards may alternatively be 
exchanged for new equivalent awards in 
the acquirer where appropriate. 

Any other reason. 

No bonus is paid. 

Not applicable. 

The table below sets out the date of the Executive Director's service contract, the dates of the Non-Executive Directors' letters of 
appointment and their notice periods. 

Victor Gladun  

Effective 20 September 20192 

6 months 

Charles Valceschini 

Effective 16 September 2019  

3 months 

Tony Alves 

Effective 16 Septmber 2019  

3 months 

Michael Bakunenko 

Effective 8 December 2017 

3 months 

Dr Rashid Javanshir 

Effective 16 September 2019  

3 months 

Service contracts and letters of appointment are available for inspection at the Company's registered office. 

Application of Policy 
The table below provides an estimate of the potential future reward opportunities for the Executive Director, and the potential split 
between the different elements of remuneration under three different performance scenarios: ‘Minimum', ‘On-target' and ‘Maximum'. 

2 Victor Gladun’s contract is for an indeterminate period subject to termination by 6 months’ notice either way. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                                                                                          
72 

GOVERNANCE 

Directors' remuneration report 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Potential reward opportunities are based on the new Policy. The annual bonus is based on the maximum opportunity level which will 
apply in 2020. Note that no PSP awards will be been granted in 2020. If a PSP award is granted in the future, a revised version of this 
table will be prepared and disclosed in the annual return 

The ‘Minimum' scenario reflects base salary, pension and benefits (i.e. fixed remuneration), being the only elements of the Executive 
Directors' remuneration package not linked to performance. 

The ‘On-target' scenario reflects fixed remuneration as above, plus on-target bonus (60% of salary).  

The ‘Maximum' scenario reflects fixed remuneration, plus full payout under all incentives (150% of salary under the annual bonus). 

The chart below illustrates the potential future remuneration for the Executive Director under the new policy. In line with current 
regulations, the illustrations do not assume any share price growth or dividend equivalent payments in share awards. 

Victor Gladun 
Illustration of package value under new policy. 

Minimum 
100% 

$415,000 

On Target 
62.5% 

$415,000 

Maximum 
40% 

$415,000 

TOTAL: $415,000 

37.5%  

$249,000 

60% 

$622,500 

TOTAL: $664,000 

TOTAL: $1,037,500 

Fixed Pay 

Annual Bonus 

Notes to application of remuneration policy charts 

Element of package 

Assumptions used 

Fixed Pay 

Annual Bonus 

Basic salary effective: 20 September 2019 
Benefits: as disclosed in single figure of remuneration 
Pension: 15% cash allowance 

Minimum: no bonus earned 
On target: 60% of maximum bonus is earned 
Maximum: 150% of maximum bonus is earned 

Consideration of conditions elsewhere in the Company and employee engagement 
The Remuneration Committee takes into consideration the remuneration arrangements for the UK-based employee population in 
making its decisions on remuneration for executive directors, non-executive directors and senior executives. More than 95% of the 
Group's staff are based outside of the UK, primarily in the Ukraine and Russia, where salaries and benefits reflect local practice. The 
Remuneration Committee does not currently consult with employees specifically on the effectiveness and appropriateness of the 
executive remuneration policy and framework. However, the Company seeks to promote and maintain good relationships with 
employee representative bodies as part of its employee engagement strategy and consults on matters affecting employees and 
business performance as required in each case by law and regulation in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates. 

Consideration of shareholders views and shareholder engagement 
When determining remuneration, the Remuneration Committee takes into account view of its shareholders and best practice 
guidelines issued by institutional shareholder bodies.  

The Remuneration Committee is always open to feedback from shareholders on remuneration policy and arrangements, and commits 
to undergoing shareholder consultation in advance of any significant changes to remuneration policy. The Remuneration Committee 
will continue to monitor trends and developments in corporate governance and market practice to ensure the structure of the 
executive remuneration remains appropriate. We will consult shareholders before making any significant changes to our 
remuneration policy. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
73 

GOVERNANCE 

Directors' report – other disclosures 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

This information is required to be presented by law. The UKLA’s Disclosure & Transparency Rules (‘DTRs’) and Listing Rules (‘LRs’) also 
require the Company to make certain disclosures. 

The Corporate Governance Report, the Audit Committee Report and the Strategic report form part of this information. Disclosures 
elsewhere in the Annual Report and Accounts are cross-referenced where appropriate. Taken together, they fulfil the combined 
requirements of company law, the DTRs and LRs. 

Legal form 

JKX Oil & Gas plc is a company limited by shares and incorporated in England & Wales, with company number 3050645. The principal 
activities of the Group are oil and gas exploration, appraisal, development and production. It conducts very limited business activities 
on its own account, and trades principally through its subsidiary undertakings in various jurisdictions. 

Annual General Meeting 

Notice of the 2020 AGM and matters of Ordinary Business and those proposed as Special Business, together with explanatory notes, 
will be sent to shareholders at least 20 clear working days before the meeting. 

At the AGM, individual shareholders are given the opportunity to put questions to the Chairman and to other members of the Board. 
The voting results are announced via the London Stock Exchange as soon as practicable after the meeting. The announcement is also 
made on the Company’s corporate website.  

Political and charitable contributions 

In line with Group policy, the Group did not make any political contributions during the year (2018: nil). The Group made charitable 
contributions of $0.3m (2018: $0.2m) for local educational, health, sport and village infrastructure initiatives in Ukraine and Russia. 

Disabled employees 

The Group gives full consideration to applications for employment from disabled persons where the requirements of the job can be 
adequately fulfilled by such persons. 

Should an existing employee become disabled, it is in the Group’s policy wherever practicable to provide continuing employment under 
normal terms and conditions and to provide training and career development and promotion. 

Greenhouse gas emissions 

The disclosures concerning greenhouse gas emissions required by law are included in the Corporate Social Responsibility review on 
pages 25 to 28. 

Policy on derivatives and financial instruments 

The Group’s objectives and policies on financial risk management, and information on the Group’s exposures to foreign exchange, 
commodity price and liquidity risks can be found on pages 32 to 39 and in Note 13 to the financial statements. 

Shares in JKX Oil & Gas plc 

Details of movements in share capital during the year are set out in Note 16 to the financial statements. The Company has one class of 
Ordinary Share which carries no right to fixed income. Each share carries the right to one vote at General Meetings of the Company. 
There are no significant restrictions on the transfer of securities. 

Treasury shares 

In 2019, the Company did not purchase in the market any of its own ordinary 10p shares, to be held as treasury shares. At 31 December 
2019, 402,771 (2018: 402,771) shares continued to be held as treasury shares representing 0.23% (2018: 0.23%) of the shares then in 
issue. 

Restrictions on voting 

No member shall, unless the Directors otherwise determine, be entitled in respect of any share held by him/her to vote either 
personally or by proxy at a shareholders’ meeting or to exercise any other right conferred by membership in relation to shareholders’ 
meetings if any call or other sum presently payable by him/her to the Company in respect of that share remains unpaid. In addition, no 
member shall be entitled to vote if he/she has been served with a notice after failing to provide the Company with information 
concerning interests in those shares required to be provided under the Companies Act. 

Amendment of Articles of Association 

Any amendments to the Articles may be made in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act by way of special resolution. 

 
 
 
74 

GOVERNANCE 

Directors' report – other disclosures 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Directors 

The names and biographies of the Directors who held office as at the date of this Annual Report are set out on pages 40 and 41.  

Directors who held office throughout 2019 and the changes made to the Board during the year are set out below: 

Name 

Charles Valceschini 

Michael Bakunenko 

Tony Alves 

Victor Gladun 

Rashid Javanshir 

Name 

Hans Jochum Horn 

Christian Bukovics 

Adrian Coates 

Andrey Shtyrba 

Appointed 

16 September 2019 

8 December 2017 

16 September 2019 

16 September 2019 

16 September 2019 

Removed/Resigned 

23 May 2019 

22 August 2019  

23 May 2019 

22 August 2019 

Position 

Non Executive Director,  

Non Executive Director 

Non Executive Director 

Executive Director 

Non Executive Director 

Position 

Non Executive Director 

Non Executive Director  

Non Executive Director 

Non Executive Director 

Appointment and replacement of Directors 

The number of Directors shall not be less than two nor more than ten. 

Directors may be appointed to the Board by shareholders by ordinary resolution or by the Board. A Director appointed by the Board 
holds office only until the next following AGM and is then eligible for election by shareholders.  

Directors and their interests 

The Directors in office at the year end and their interests at the beginning and end of the year in the shares of the Company, all 
beneficially held, were as follows: 

1 January 2019  
Ordinary Share  
Number 

31 December 2019 
Ordinary Share  
Number 

Michael Bakunenko1 

47,287,027  

47,287,027  

1  Michael Bakunenko as a nominee for Eclairs Group Limited, is deemed to have a beneficial interest in these ordinary shares. 

There were no changes to the shareholdings of the continuing Directors between the end of the financial year and the date of this 
Annual Report. 

Details of Directors’ remuneration and share options are shown in the Remuneration Report on pages 59 to 63. No Director had a 
material interest in any significant contract, other than a service contract or contract for services, with the Company or any of its 
subsidiary companies at any time during the year. 

The share capital structure is listed in Note 16 to the financial statements and the significant holdings are listed below.  

Directors’ indemnities  

As permitted by the Articles of Association, the Directors have the benefit of an indemnity which is a qualifying third party indemnity 
provision as defined by Section 234 of the Companies Act 2006. The indemnity was in force throughout the last financial year and is 
currently in force. The Company also purchased and maintained throughout the financial year Directors’ and Officers’ liability 
insurance in respect of itself and its Directors. 

Change of control (significant contracts) 

The Company is not party to any significant agreements (and was not party to any significant agreements during 2019) that take effect, 
alter or terminate upon a change of control following a takeover except for the $40m convertible bond dated 19 February 2013 (which, 
following repurchases and cancellation of bonds during 2016, was reduced to a nominal value of $16m of which $5.7m remained 
outstanding at 31 December 2019, see Note 11 to the consolidated financial statements). The final payments due under the terms of the 
convertible bond were made on 19 February 2020 and it is now fully redeemed and all payments due have been made. There are no 
agreements between the Company and any Director or its employees that would provide compensation for loss of office or employment 
resulting from a change of control following a takeover bid, except that provisions of the Company’s share schemes may cause options 

 
 
 
 
 
75 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

and awards granted under such schemes to vest in those circumstances. All of the Company’s share schemes contain provisions relating 
to a change of control. Outstanding options and awards would normally vest and become exercisable for a limited period of time upon a 
change of control following a takeover, reconstruction or winding up of the Company (not being an internal reorganisation), subject at 
that time to rules concerning the satisfaction of any performance conditions. There are a number of other agreements that take effect, 
alter or terminate upon a change of control of the Company such as commercial contracts, finance agreements and property lease 
arrangements. None of these is considered to be significant in terms of their likely impact on the business of the Group as a whole. 
There were no options or awards outstanding under any such scheme as at 31 December 2019 and no options or awards have been 
granted between that date and the 31 March 2020. 

Events after the reporting date 

Events after the reporting date are discussed in Note 33 to the financial statements. 

Substantial shareholders 

At 31 December 2019 and at 29 March 2020, the Company had received notification from the following institutions of interests in 
excess of 3% of the total number of voting rights of the Company: 

Substantial shareholders 

Eclairs Group Limited 

Cascade Investment Fund 

Neptune Invest & Finance Corp 

Keyhall Holding Limited 

Interneft Ltd 

31 December 2018  
Number of shares  

31 December 2018  
% of total voting rights 

29 March 2019  
Number of shares  

29 March 2019  
% of total voting rights 

47,287,027 

34,288,253 

22,295,598 

19,656,344 

10,599,447 

27.54% 

19.97% 

12.98% 

11.45% 

6.16% 

47,287,027 

34,288,253 

22,295,598 

19,656,344 

10,601,447 

27.54% 

19.97% 

12.98% 

11.45% 

6.16% 

Directors’ responsibilities statement 

The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report, the Directors’ Remuneration Report and the financial statements 
in accordance with applicable law and regulation. 

  Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law the Directors have 
prepared the Group financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by 
the European Union, and the parent company financial statements in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted 
Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards, comprising FRS 101 “Reduced Disclosure Framework”, and 
applicable law). Under company law the Directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they 
give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Group and the parent company and of the profit or loss of the Group and 
parent company for that period. In preparing these financial statements, the Directors are required to:  

  select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently; 

  make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent; 

  state whether they have been prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European Union for the group financial 
statements and United Kingdom Accounting Standards, comprising FRS 101, have been followed for the parent company 
financial statements, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements; prepare the 
financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Group and parent company will 
continue in business: and  

  prepare a director’s report, a strategic report and director’s remuneration report which comply with the requirements of the 

Companies Act 2006. 

The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the Group and 
parent company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the parent company 
and the Group and enable them to ensure that the financial statements and the Remuneration Report comply with the Companies 
Act 2006 and, as regards the Group financial statements, Article 4 of the IAS Regulation.  

The Directors are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the parent company and the Group and hence for taking 
reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities. 

The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and integrity of the parent company’s website. Legislation in the United 
Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements may differ from legislation in other jurisdictions.  

Other disclosures 

Certain information that is required to be included in the Directors’ Report can be found elsewhere in this document as referred to 
below, each of which is, to the extent not in this report, incorporated by reference. 

 
 
 
 
76 

GOVERNANCE 

Directors' report – other disclosures 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Dividends 

No dividends have been paid or proposed for the year ended 31 December 2019. The Board will not be recommending the payment of a 
dividend at the forthcoming AGM. 

Going concern 

The going concern statement can be found on pages 91 - 92. 

Future developments within the Group 

The Strategic report starting on page 1 contains details of likely future developments within the Group. 

Profit 

Details of the Company’s profit for the year ended 31 December 2019 can be found on page 85 - 87. 

Capitalised interest 

No interest was capitalised in 2019 (2018: nil). 

Long term incentive schemes 

See pages 58 to 71 of the Directors’ Remuneration Report. 

Directors’ responsibilities 

Directors’ responsibilities pursuant to DTR4 
The directors confirm to the best of their knowledge: 

  The Group financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as 

adopted by the European Union and Article 4 of the IAS Regulation and give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial 
position and profit and loss of the Group. 

  The parent company financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted 

Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards, comprising FRS 101 “Reduced Disclosure Framework”, and applicable 
law), give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position and loss of the company; 

  The annual report includes a fair review of the development and performance of the business and the financial position of the Group 

and the parent company, together with a description of the principal risks and uncertainties that they face. 

  The annual report and financial statements, taken as a whole is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the information 

necessary for shareholders to assess the Group and parent company's performance, business model and strategy; 

  In the case of each Director in office at the date the Directors’ Report is approved: 

  so far as the Director is aware, there is no relevant audit information of which the Group and parent company’s auditors are unaware; 

and 

  he or she has taken all the steps that he or she ought to have taken as a Director in order to make himself  or herself aware of any 

relevant audit information and to establish that the Group and parent company’s auditors are aware of that information. 

By order of the Board 

Julian Hicks 
Company Secretary  
31 March 2020 

 
 
 
77 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Independent auditor’s report 

to the members of JKX Oil & Gas plc 

Report on the audit of the group financial statements 

Opinion 
We have audited the financial statements of JKX Oil & Gas Plc (the ‘Parent Company’) and its subsidiaries (the ‘Group’) for the year 
ended 31 December 2019 which comprise the consolidated income statement, the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, 
the consolidated and company statement of financial position, the consolidated and company statement of cash flows, the consolidated 
and company statement of changes in equity and notes to the financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting 
policies.  

The financial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the Group financial statements is applicable law and 
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union. The financial reporting framework that has 
been applied in the preparation of the Parent Company financial statements is applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting 
Standards, including Financial Reporting Standard 101 Reduced Disclosure Framework (United Kingdom Generally Accepted 
Accounting Practice). 

In our opinion the financial statements: 

  give a true and fair view of the state of the Group’s and of the Parent Company’s affairs as at 31 December 2019 and of the Group’s 

profit for the year then ended; 

  the Group financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European Union; 

  the Parent Company financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted 

Accounting Practice; and 

  the financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 and Article 4 of the IAS 

Regulation. 

Basis for opinion  
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our 
responsibilities under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements 
section of our report. We are independent of the Group and the Parent Company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are 
relevant to our audit of the financial statements in the UK, including the FRC’s Ethical Standard as applied to public interest entities, 
and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we 
have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. 

Material uncertainty in relation to going concern arising from the Covid-19 pandemic 
We draw attention to note 2 in the financial statements which sets out the directors’ considerations of the potential impact on the 
Group’s business of the Covid-19 pandemic. As stated in note 2, these events or conditions, indicate that a material uncertainty exists 
that may cast significant doubt on the Group and Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not 
include the adjustments that would result if the Company and Group were unable to continue as a going concern. Our opinion is not 
modified in respect of this matter.  

We have highlighted going concern as a key audit matter as a result of the estimates and judgments required determining oil and gas 
prices, production, the timing and quantum of potential 2010 and 2015 Rental fee payments in the period to June 2021, and the 
availability of sufficient and appropriate lending facilities. The level of judgment and estimation uncertainty has subsequently been 
significantly increased by the Covid-19 pandemic. We considered the resulting potential impact and the effect on our audit strategy 
made this a key audit matter. 

Our audit procedures in response to this key audit matter included: 
  We discussed the potential impact of Covid-19 with management and the Audit Committee including their assessment of risks and 
uncertainties associated with areas such as the Group’s workforce, supply chain, customer sales and commodity market prices that 
are relevant to the Group’s business model and operations. We formed our own assessment of risks and uncertainties based on our 
understanding of the business and oil and gas sector.  

  We obtained management’s reverse stress testing analysis which was performed to determine the point at which liquidity breaks and 

considered whether such scenarios, including significant reductions in commodity prices and production were possible given the 
potential impacts of Covid-19 and the level of uncertainty. 

  We evaluated potential mitigating actions identified by management. In doing so we confirmed the terms of facilities in place and 

assessed the risk that draw down requests may not be approved given uncertainties associated with Covid-19. We used our Ukrainian 
tax and legal specialists to confirm that Ukrainian legislation allows for payment plans to be granted should the rental claims fall 
due but such arrangements are at the discretion of the relevant governmental departments. 

  We obtained management’s base case cash flow forecast, challenging the key operating assumptions based on 2019 and 2020 actual 

results and external data and market commentary, where possible. 

  We tested the integrity of the forecast models and assessed their consistency with approved budgets and Field Development Plans, as 

applicable.  

  We confirmed that the forecasts did not include any receipts associated with the arbitration award detailed in ‘Rental fee claims in 

Ukraine’ below. 

 
 
78 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Independent auditor’s report 

to the members of JKX Oil & Gas plc 

  We critically assessed management’s judgments regarding the quantum and timing of rental fee payments to assess the status of the 
claims, scenarios for the remaining legal process and risks of acceleration in the timing of potential payments, as well as considering 
the impact of the wider Ukrainian economic, political and legislative environment on the Group’s operations. In doing so, we made 
inquiries of internal and external legal counsel and involved our own Ukrainian legal specialists.  

  We reviewed the adequacy and completeness of disclosures in the financial statements in respect of going concern. 

Conclusions relating to principal risks and viability statement 
We have nothing to report in respect of the following information in the annual report, in relation to which the ISAs (UK) require us to 
report to you whether we have anything material to add or draw attention to: 

  the disclosures in the annual report set out on pages 30 - 39 that describe the principal risks and explain how they are being managed 

or mitigated; or 

  the directors’ confirmation set out on page 38 in the annual report that they have carried out a robust assessment of the principal 

risks facing the Group, including those that would threaten its business model, future performance, solvency or liquidity. 

  the directors’ statement set out on page 53 in the financial statements about whether the directors considered it appropriate to 

adopt the going concern basis of accounting in preparing the financial statements and the directors’ identification of any material 
uncertainties to the Group’s ability to continue to do so over a period of at least twelve months from the date of approval of the 
financial statements; 

  whether the directors’ statement relating to going concern required under the Listing Rules in accordance with Listing Rule 9.8.6R(3) 

is materially inconsistent with our knowledge obtained in the audit; or 

  the directors’ explanation set out on page 38 in the annual report as to how they have assessed the prospects of the Group, over what 

period they have done so and why they consider that period to be appropriate, and their statement as to whether they have a 
reasonable expectation that the Group will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the period of 
their assessment, including any related disclosures drawing attention to any necessary qualifications or assumptions. 

Key audit matters 
In addition to the matter described in the material uncertainty relating to going concern paragraph above, key audit matters are those 
matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most significance in our audit of the financial statements of the current period and 
include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) that we identified, including those 
which had the greatest effect on the overall audit strategy, the allocation of resources in the audit and directing the efforts of the 
engagement team. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming our 
opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. 

Key Audit Matter 

How the matter was addressed in our audit 

Carrying value of oil and gas assets  
(see note 5) 

Management and the Directors are required to assess whether 
there are potential indicators of impairment of the Group’s oil and 
gas assets at each reporting date and, if potential indicators of 
impairment are identified, management are required to perform a 
full assessment of the recoverable value of the oil and gas assets 
in accordance with the requirements of the relevant accounting 
standard. 

Management identified an impairment indicator in respect of 
each of the three cash generating units in the Ukraine and Russia 
and performed an impairment test. Based on that impairment test 
management concluded that no impairment was required. 

The assessment of the recoverable value of the oil and gas assets 
required judgments and estimates by management and the Board 
regarding the inputs applied in the models including future oil 
and gas prices, production and reserves, operating and 
development costs and discount rates.  

The carrying value of the Group’s oil and gas assets were 
therefore considered to be a key audit matter. 

We obtained and examined management’s impairment indicator 
paper and agreed with their conclusion that a potential indicator 
of impairment was present, as detailed in note 5. Accordingly, we 
obtained management’s impairment test assessments. 

We assessed the appropriateness of Management’s determination 
of each cash generating unit (CGU) in order to determine if the 
conclusions were in line with the relevant accounting standard. 

We obtained management’s discounted cash flow models and 
performed data integrity and mechanical checks on the models 
using our proprietary tool. 

We determined whether the basis of preparation of the models 
were in line with the applicable accounting standard, our 
expectations and valuation methodology.  

We compared the actual performance of the CGUs during 2019 to 
budgets for the period in order to assess the quality of 
management’s forecasting. 

We critically challenged the NPV model, focussing on the 
appropriateness of estimates with reference to empirical data 
and external evidence with specific emphasis on the following 
assumptions: oil and gas prices, foreign exchange rates, reserves 

 
 
 
 
79 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Key Audit Matter 

How the matter was addressed in our audit 

and production levels, operating and development costs and 
discount rates.  

We compared forecast oil and gas prices in Ukraine to current 
pricing, empirical data and market analysis compiled with our 
internal research team. In addition, we compared the price 
forecasts to those forecast by managements external reserves 
engineer. In Russia, where prices are regulated, we compared 
forecasts to current contracted prices and market inflation data. 

We assessed the consistency of production profiles and capital 
expenditure forecasts against the Group’s Field Development 
Plans, approved budgets, external reserves engineer decline 
rates, and met with operational management to inform our 
assessment and understanding of these plans and budgets.  

We compared the 2P reserves included in the models to Reserve 
Statements prepared by the Group’s internal and external reserve 
engineers and performed procedures to assess for both their 
independence and competence. We met with both the internal 
and external reserve engineers as part of this process and 
ascertained there had been no limitation to their scope. 

We compared management’s key assumptions to relevant 
assumptions used by the external reserve engineers and 
considered the appropriateness of management’s assumptions 
based on the field development plan and the merits of different 
economic assumptions.  

We reviewed management’s sensitivity analysis and performed 
our own sensitivity analysis on key inputs to assess the impact of 
changes in assumptions. 

We involved our valuations specialists to review the valuation 
methodology and support our assessment of the discount rates 
applied and discussed the judgments regarding the calculation 
with the Audit Committee. 

We read the key licence agreements and confirmed that the 
Group holds valid licences. We considered management’s 
judgment that licences would be capable of being extended 
beyond 2024 and 2026 including assessment of the legislative 
process, the forecast economic value of the assets beyond the 
expiry date and risks and uncertainties within the operating 
environments.  

We evaluated management’s conclusion that the potential impact 
of Covid-19 and the impact of represented a non-adjusting 
subsequent event against the relevant accounting standards. 

We reviewed the disclosures in the financial statements 
regarding key assumptions and sensitivity of the carrying value 
to reasonable changes in such assumptions to ensure they were in 
accordance with the requirements of the relevant accounting 
standard. 

Key Observation 
Based on the procedures performed, we noted no material issues arising from our work in relation to the carrying value of oil and gas 
assets. We found management’s conclusion that no impairment charge was required as at 31 December 2019 in respect of the CGU’s to 
be supported by the underlying models.  We found the disclosures in note 5 to be appropriate. We found the conclusion that the 
potential impact of Covid-19 represent a non-adjusting subsequent event and the disclosures regarding such subsequent events to be 
appropriate. We found the judgments and estimates applied by management in preparing the forecasts to be supportable, although the 

 
 
 
 
 
80 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Independent auditor’s report 

to the members of JKX Oil & Gas plc 

sensitivity  to changes in key inputs including oil and gas prices, foreign exchange rates and discount rates has increased compared to 
2018. 

We found the disclosures in note 5 to be appropriate.  

Key Audit Matter 

How the matter was addressed in our audit 

Rental fee claims in the Ukraine  
(see notes 18 and 25) 

The assessment of the provisioning for the 2010 and 2015 Rental 
fee claims requires significant judgement and estimation by 
management including both the value of the provision and its 
presentation within the financial statements.  

Management have recorded a provision of $41.3m with $14.4m of 
provisions released in the year as detailed in notes 18 and 25.  

Separately, in a prior period the Group was awarded $11.8m plus 
interest and costs at international arbitration in relation to 
claims brought by the Group against the Ukraine. The Group 
registered its claim and filed application for collection in 
December 2019. The assessment of whether the award meets 
asset recognition criteria at year end under relevant accounting 
standards requires judgment given the operating environment. 

The legislation behind the Rental fee claims is complex in nature 
and the claims have been, and continue to be, subject to court 
proceedings which are at various stages of progression. When 
taken together with the developing nature of the Ukrainian tax 
system and the challenging legal and political regime, to which 
the Group are subject, this area is considered to be a key audit 
matter.  

We held focused meetings with management, internal and 
external legal counsel in order to obtain an understanding of the 
significant developments in the year and the impact of the wider 
legislative environment in the Ukraine on the overall assessment 
of the claims. 

We read key correspondence in the year between the Group, its 
external legal advisers and the tax and legal authorities for 
indications of additional claims or factors which may indicate 
management’s conclusions are inappropriate. 

We inspected a number of critical documents such as the most 
recent court rulings in the Ukraine during 2019 and 2020 to date, 
including those relating to the claims for which provisions have 
been released.  

We evaluated management’s conclusion that it remained 
appropriate to maintain provision against the remaining claims, 
following the awards in the Group’s favour to date. In doing so, we 
considered the background to the favourable awards and 
legislative environment in the Ukraine.  

We performed a recalculation of the movement in the Rental 
claim provision including interest accrued and the quantum of 
amounts released.  

We compared the base claim amounts to the original claim 
documents and assessed the compliance of the fines and penalties 
with local legislation. We specifically considered and challenged 
any change to the basis of the calculations from prior year and 
assessed the calculations for consistency with relevant Ukrainian 
legislation in conjunction with our own legal and tax specialists.  

We obtained legal letters from the Group’s external legal advisor 
and compared these to management’s assessment of each claim.  

We confirmed that there were no changes to the previous basis of 
preparation and critically assessed the calculations for 
consistency with relevant Ukrainian legislation, in conjunction 
with our legal experts in the Ukraine and assessed whether 
judgments and estimates associated with the claims were 
supportable and appropriate.  

We obtained management’s analysis of the estimated timing of 
any payments, discussed further under  the material uncertainty 
relating to going concern paragraph above and agreed the 
presentational split between current and non-current provision 
was consistent with this analysis. 

In respect of the arbitration award, we confirmed the status of the 
award with the Management, internal and external legal counsel 
regarding the registration of the claim in Ukraine and reviewed 
related documents. 

 
 
 
 
81 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Key Audit Matter 

How the matter was addressed in our audit 

We critically assessed Management’s judgments regarding the 
probability of ultimate recovery and associated financial 
reporting treatment. We specifically considered factors such as 
the local legislative environment, history of awards being 
successfully enforced and other relevant facts and circumstances. 
We discussed the process with legal counsel and the Board. 

We reviewed the disclosures in the financial statements. In 
particular, we focused on ensuring that the disclosures are clear, 
transparent and understandable notwithstanding the complex 
nature of the matters. 

Key Observation 
Based on the procedures performed, we noted no material issues arising from our work in relation to the Rental fee claims in the 
Ukraine. We found management’s conclusion that it remains appropriate to record a provision in respect of the 2010 Rental fee claim 
to be appropriate given the uncertainties associated with the remaining court process. We found the release of provisions in respect of 
four of the total 2015 Rental fee claims to be appropriate. We found the conclusion that it remains appropriate to maintain provision in 
respect of the remaining 2015 Rental fee claims to be appropriate recognising the uncertainty associated with the court process. We 
found the value of the provision to be appropriate and that the underlying judgments in determining the quantum to be acceptable. 

We found the presentation of the provisions between current and non-current classifications in the statement of financial position to 
be appropriate and consistent with the Board’s assessment of the most likely timing of any required payments. 

We found the disclosures in note 18 and 25 to be appropriate. 

Our application of materiality 
We apply the concept of materiality both in planning and performing our audit, and in evaluating the effect of misstatements. We 
consider materiality to be the magnitude by which misstatements, including omissions, could influence the economic decisions of 
reasonable users that are taken on the basis of the financial statements. Importantly, misstatements below these levels will not 
necessarily be evaluated as immaterial as we also take account of the nature of identified misstatements, and the particular 
circumstances of their occurrence, when evaluating their effect on the financial statements as a whole.  

Materiality  

Basis for determining materiality  

Group 

$1,100,000 

5% of profit before tax before 
exceptional items 

Group 

Performance materiality 

$825,000 

Basis for performance materiality 

75% of Group materiality 

Materiality  

Company 

$780,000 

Basis for determining materiality  

1% of total assets  

Performance materiality 

Company 

$585,000 

Basis for performance materiality 

73% of Company materiality 

We considered the activities of the Group and previous period benchmarks. Given the Group earnings are now stabilising from prior 
year, we consider a profit before tax before exceptional items based measure to appropriately reflect the key drivers of the business at 
present and therefore and appropriate basis for materiality. 

Whilst materiality for the financial statements as a whole was $1,100,000, each significant component of the Group was audited to a 
lower performance materiality ranging from $110,000 to $600,000. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
82 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Independent auditor’s report 

to the members of JKX Oil & Gas plc 

Performance materiality has been set at 75% of materiality, which is used to determine the financial statement areas that are included 
within the scope of our audit and the extent of sample sizes during the audit. Performance materiality is applied at the individual 
account or balance level set at an amount to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that the aggregate of uncorrected and 
undetected misstatements exceeds materiality for the financial statements as a whole.  

We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to them all individual audit differences identified during the course of our 
audit in excess of $20,000. We also agreed to report differences below that threshold that, in our view, warranted reporting on 
qualitative grounds. 

An overview of the scope of our audit 
In setting our Group audit strategy we obtain an understanding of the Group, its environment and assessed the risks of material 
misstatement in the financial statements at the Group as a whole.  

In setting the audit strategy we considered our approach in respect of the ability of the audit to detect irregularities, including fraud. 
We designed audit procedures to respond to the risk, recognising that the risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is 
higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from error, as a fraud may involve deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery 
or intentional misrepresentations or through collusion.  

We considered the laws and regulations of the Ukraine, Russia and the UK to be of significance in the context of the Group audit. As 
part of our Group audit strategy direction was provided to the auditors of the significant components to ensure an assessment was 
performed on the extent of the components compliance with the relevant local and regulatory framework. As part of our Group audit 
work we reviewed this work and held meetings with relevant internal Management and external third parties to form our own opinion 
on the extent of Group wide compliance. In addition our tests included, but were not limited to agreement of the Financial Statement 
disclosures to underlying supporting documentation, performing substantive testing on accounts balances which were considered to be 
at a greater risk of susceptibility to fraud and reviewed correspondence with regulators in so far as the correspondence related to the 
Financial Statements. There are inherent limitations in the audit procedures described above and the further removed non-compliance 
with laws and regulations is from the events and transactions reflected in the Financial Statements, the less likely we would become 
aware of it.    

The Group’s operations principally comprise exploration, development and production assets split across two primary geographical 
locations being Ukraine and Russia. We assessed there to be two significant components (Ukraine and Russia) which were both subject 
to a full scope audit. Together with the parent company (also considered a significant component) and its group consolidation, which 
was also subject to a full scope audit, these represent the significant components of the Group. 

The three significant components subject to full scope audit procedures represent the principal business units and account for 100% of 
the Group’s revenue, 94% of the Group’s profit before tax and 99% of the Group’s total assets. 

The audits of the Ukrainian and Russian components were performed in the Ukraine and Russia, respectively. The audits of the parent 
company and the Group consolidation were performed in the United Kingdom. All of the audits were conducted by BDO LLP and BDO 
network member firms. 

All BDO member firms performed the full scope audit of the significant components in the Ukraine and Russia, under the direction and 
supervision of BDO LLP as Group auditor.  

As part of our audit strategy, the Group Audit Partner or a Key Audit Partner and senior members of the Group audit team visited both 
of the Group’s key oil and gas operations during the year and met with management and the component auditors in the Ukraine and 
Russia during the planning and execution phases of the audit. These teams from BDO UK performed a review of the component audit 
files in the Ukraine and Russia and held meetings with the component audit teams during the planning and completion phases of their 
audits.  

The Group audit team was actively involved in the direction of the audits performed by the component auditors along with the 
consideration of findings and determination of conclusions drawn. We performed additional procedures in respect of certain of the 
significant risk areas that represented Key Audit Matters in addition to the procedures performed by the component auditor. 

The remaining components of the group were considered non-significant and these components were principally subject to analytical 
review procedures. 

Other information 
The directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the annual 
report, other than the financial statements and our auditor’s report thereon. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the 
other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in our report, we do not express any form of assurance 
conclusion thereon. 

In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider 
whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit or 
otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are 
required to determine whether there is a material misstatement in the financial statements or a material misstatement of the other 
information. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of the other information, we 
are required to report that fact. 

 
 
83 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

We have nothing to report in this regard. 

In this context, we also have nothing to report in regard to our responsibility to specifically address the following items in the other 
information and to report as uncorrected material misstatements of the other information where we conclude that those items meet 
the following conditions: 

  Fair, balanced and understandable set out on page 76 the statement given by the directors that they consider the annual report and 
financial statements taken as a whole is fair, balanced and understandable and provides the information necessary for shareholders 
to assess the Group’s performance, business model and strategy, is materially inconsistent with our knowledge obtained in the audit; 
or 

  Audit committee reporting set out on page 51 the section describing the work of the audit committee does not appropriately address 

matters communicated by us to the audit committee; or 

  Directors’ statement of compliance with the UK Corporate Governance Code set out on page 47 the parts of the directors’ statement 

required under the Listing Rules relating to the Company’s compliance with the UK Corporate Governance Code containing 
provisions specified for review by the auditor in accordance with Listing Rule 9.8.10R(2) do not properly disclose a departure from a 
relevant provision of the UK Corporate Governance Code. 

Opinions on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2006 
In our opinion, the part of the directors’ remuneration report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the 
Companies Act 2006. 

In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit: 

  the information given in the strategic report and the directors’ report for the financial year for which the financial statements are 

prepared is consistent with the financial statements; and 

  the strategic report and the directors’ report have been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements. 

Matters on which we are required to report by exception 
In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the Group and the Parent Company and its environment obtained in the course of 
the audit, we have not identified material misstatements in: 
  the strategic report or the Directors’ report; or 
  the information about internal control and risk management systems in relation to financial reporting processes and about share 

capital structures, given in compliance with rules 7.2.5 and 7.2.6 of the FCA Rules. 

We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in relation to which the Companies Act 2006 requires us to report to you 
if, in our opinion: 

  adequate accounting records have not been kept by the Parent Company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received 

from branches not visited by us; or 

  the Parent Company financial statements and the part of the directors’ remuneration report to be audited are not in agreement with 

the accounting records and returns; or 

  certain disclosures of directors’ remuneration specified by law are not made. 

Responsibilities of directors 
As explained more fully in the directors’ responsibilities statement set out on page 76, the directors are responsible for the preparation 
of the financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the directors 
determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to 
fraud or error. 

In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the Group’s and the Parent Company’s ability to 
continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting 
unless the directors either intend to liquidate the Group or the Parent Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative 
but to do so. 

Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements 
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material 
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high 
level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material 
misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the 
aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial 
statements. 

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the Financial Reporting Council’s 
website at: www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditor’s report. 

 
 
 
 
 
84 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Independent auditor’s report 

to the members of JKX Oil & Gas plc 

Other matters which we are required to address 
Following the recommendation of the audit committee, we were appointed by the Board of directors on 13 October 2018 to audit the 
financial statements for the year ending 31 December 2018 and subsequent financial periods. The period of total uninterrupted 
engagement is two years, covering the years ending 31 December 2018 and 31 December 2019.  

The non-audit services prohibited by the FRC’s Ethical Standard were not provided to the Group or the Parent Company and we remain 
independent of the Group and the Parent Company in conducting our audit. 

Our audit opinion is consistent with the additional report to the audit committee. 

Use of our report 
This report is made solely to the Parent Company’s members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 
2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Parent Company’s members those matters we are required to 
state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume 
responsibility to anyone other than the Company and the Parent Company’s members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or 
for the opinions we have formed. 

Ryan Ferguson (Senior Statutory Auditor) 
For and on behalf of BDO LLP, Statutory Auditor 
London 

31 March 2020 

BDO LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales (with registered number OC305127). 

 
 
 
 
85 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Consolidated income statement 

For the year ended 31 December 2019 

Revenue 

Cost of sales 

Exceptional item – net reversal of provision/(provision for production based taxes) 

Other production based taxes 

Other cost of sales  

Total cost of sales 

Gross profit 

Administrative expenses 

Loss on foreign exchange 

Profit from operations before exceptional items 

Profit from operations after exceptional items 

Finance income 

Finance costs 

Fair value movement on derivative liability 

Profit before tax 

Taxation – current 

Taxation – deferred 

- before the exceptional items 

- on the exceptional items 

Total taxation  

Profit from continuing operations (attributable to equity holders of the parent company) 

Note 

2019 
$000 

2018 
$000 

4 

101,744 

92,873 

18 

19 

19 

19 

20 

21 

12 

25 

25 

25 

25 

8,410 

(23,518) 

(41,264) 

(56,372) 

(5,055) 

(21,857) 

(35,629) 

(62,541) 

45,372 

30,332 

(13,207) 

(13,945) 

(615) 

(711) 

23,140 

31,550 

857  

20,731 

15,676 

908 

(2,054) 

(2,510) 

62 

30,415 

(6,561) 

(1,968)  
(1,677) 

(10,206) 

20,209  

(59) 

14,015 

 (5,478) 

1,472 

1,761 

(2,245) 

11,770 

Profit from discontinued operation (attributable to equity holders of the parent company), net 
of tax 

14  

2,004 

3,487 

Profit for the year attributable to equity shareholders of the parent company 

22,213 

15,257 

The above consolidated income statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes on pages 91 to 128

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
86 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Consolidated income statement 

For the year ended 31 December 2019 

Earnings per share for profit from continuing operations attributable to 
the ordinary equity holders of the parent company: 

Basic profit per 10p ordinary share (in cents) 

-after exceptional items 

-before exceptional items 

Diluted profit per 10p ordinary share (in cents) 

-after exceptional items 

-before exceptional items 

Earnings per share for (loss) /profit from discontinued operations 
attributable to the ordinary equity holders of the parent company: 

Basic profit/(loss) per 10p ordinary share (in cents) 

-after exceptional items 

-before exceptional items 

Diluted profit/(loss) per 10p ordinary share (in cents) 

-after exceptional items 

-before exceptional items 

Earnings per share for profit attributable to the ordinary equity holders of 
the parent company: 

Basic profit per 10p ordinary share (in cents) 

-after exceptional items 

-before exceptional items 

Diluted profit per 10p ordinary share (in cents) 

-after exceptional items 

-before exceptional items 

Note 
27 

2019 
$000 

2018 
$000 

27 

27 

27 

27 

27 

27 

27 

27 

27 

27 

27 

27 

12.02 

8.02 

12.02 

8.02 

1.19 

(0.14) 

1.19 

(0.14) 

13.21 

7.88 

13.21 

7.88 

7.06 

9.04 

6.67 

8.54 

2.09 

2.09 

1.98 

1.98 

9.15 

11.13 

8.65 

10.51 

The above consolidated income statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes on pages 91 to 128

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
87 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Consolidated statement of comprehensive income 

For the year ended 31 December 2019 

Profit for the year  

Other comprehensive income to be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods when specific 
conditions are met: 

2019 
$000 

2018 
$000 

22,213 

15,257 

- Currency translation differences 

21,481 

(19,475) 

Other comprehensive income that will not be reclassified to profit or loss in subsequent periods:  

- Remeasurements of post-employment benefit obligations 

- Changes in the fair value of equity investments at fair value through other comprehensive income  

Other comprehensive income for the year, net of tax 

Total comprehensive  income for the year attributable to equity shareholders of the parent company 

Continuing operations 

Discontinued operations 

(94) 

500 

21,887 

44,100 

42,096 

2,004 

(22) 

- 

(19,497) 

(4,240) 

(7,587) 

3,347 

The above consolidated statement of comprehensive income should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes on  
pages 91 to 128 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
88 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Consolidated statement of financial position 

As at 31 December 2019 

ASSETS 

Non-current assets 

Property, plant and equipment 

Deferred tax assets 

Investment 

Current assets 

Inventories  

Trade and other receivables 

Cash and cash equivalents 

Assets classified as held for sale 

Total current assets 

Total assets 

LIABILITIES  

Current liabilities 

Current tax liabilities 

Trade and other payables 

Borrowings 

Provisions 

Lease liabilities 

Liabilities of disposal group classified as held for sale 

Total current liabilities 

Non-current liabilities 

Provisions 

Borrowings 

Derivatives 

Defined pension benefit plan 

Lease liabilities 

Deferred tax liabilities 

Total liabilities 

Net assets 

EQUITY 

Share capital 

Share premium 

Other reserves  

Retained earnings 

Total equity 

Note 

2019 
$000 

2018* 
$000 

5(a) 

26 

6 

7 

8 

9 

14 

10 

11 

18 

10 

14 

18 

11 

12 

10 

26 

16 

17 

215,728 

8,012 

500 

175,112 

10,419 

- 

224,240 

185,531 

6,915 

3,931  

20,629 

31,475 

3,187 

34,662 

4,352 

5,111 

19,182 

28,645 

1,237 

29,882 

258,902 

215,413 

(1,941) 

(14,158) 

(5,683) 

(15,861) 

(1,461) 

(39,104) 

(287) 

(2,214) 

 (10,782) 

(5,962) 

(12,645) 

- 

(31,603) 

(775) 

(39,391) 

(32,378) 

(31,769) 

- 

- 

(859) 

(628) 
- 
(33,256) 
(72,647) 
186,255 

(35,673) 

(5,041) 

(62) 

(577) 

- 

 - 

(41,353) 

(73,731) 

141,682 

26,666 

97,476 

26,666 

97,476 

(150,736) 

(172,623) 

212,849 

186,255 

190,163 

141,682 

Comparative amounts in respect of inventories and property, plant and equipment have been reclassified for comparability with 2019. Please refer to Note 2. 

These financial statements on pages 85 to 128 were approved by the Board of Directors on  31 March 2020 and signed on its behalf by: 

Victor Gladun 

Chief Executive Officer 

Ben Fraser 

Chief Financial Officer 

The above consolidated statement of financial position should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes on pages 91 to 128 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
  
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
89 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Consolidated statement of changes in equity 

For the year ended 31 December 2019 

At 1 January 2019 

Profit for the year 

Exchange differences arising on translation of overseas 
operations 

Remeasurement of post-employment benefit obligations 

Changes in the fair value of equity investments at fair 
value through other comprehensive income 
Total comprehensive income attributable to equity 
shareholders of the parent 

Transactions with equity shareholders of the parent 

Share-based payment charge 

Exercise of share options (Note 15) 

Sale of shares held by Employee Benefit Trust (Note 15) 

Total transactions with equity shareholders of the parent 

Attributable to equity shareholders of the parent 

Share  
capital  
$000 

Share  
premium  
$000 

Retained  
Earnings  
$000 

Other reserves  
(Note 17)  

$000 

Total  
equity  
$000 

26,666 

97,476 

190,163 

(172,623) 

141,682 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

22,213 

- 

22,213 

- 

- 

- 

21,481 

21,481 

(94) 

500 

(94) 

500 

22,213 

21,887 

44,100 

14 

17 

442 

473 

- 

- 

- 

- 

14 

17 

442 

473 

At 31 December 2019 

26,666 

97,476 

212,849 

(150,736) 

186,255 

At 1 January 2018 

Profit for the year 

Exchange differences arising on translation of overseas 
operations 

Remeasurement of post-employment benefit obligations 

Total comprehensive loss attributable to equity 
shareholders of the parent 

Transactions with equity shareholders of the parent 

Share-based payment charge 

Total transactions with equity shareholders of the parent 

26,666 

97,476 

174,893 

(153,126) 

145,909 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

15,257 

- 

15,257 

- 

- 

 (19,475) 

 (19,475) 

 (22) 

 (22) 

15,257 

(19,497) 

(4,240) 

13 

13 

- 

- 

13 

13 

At 31 December 2018 

26,666 

97,476 

190,163 

(172,623) 

141,682 

Share premium represents the amounts received by the Company on the issue of its shares which were in excess of the nominal value 
of the shares.  

Retained earnings represent the cumulative net gains and losses recognised in the statement of comprehensive income less any 
amounts reflected directly in other reserves.  

Other reserves – please refer to the Note 17 for the details. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
90 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Consolidated statement of cash flows 

For the year ended 31 December 2019 

Note 

29 

14 

Cash flows from operating activities 

Cash generated from continuing operations 

Cash used in discontinued operations 

Bank fees paid 

Interest paid 

Income tax paid 

Net cash generated from operating activities 

Cash flows from investing activities 

Interest received 

Dividend received 

Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment 

Purchase of property, plant and equipment  

Net cash used in investing activities 

Cash flows from financing activities 

Restricted cash movement 

Exercise of share options 

Sale of shares held by Employee Benefit Trust 

Repayment of borrowings 

Lease liabilities 

Net cash used in financing activities 

Increase in cash and cash equivalents in the year 

Cash and cash equivalents at 1 January 

Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents 

Cash and cash equivalents at 31 December 

Cash and cash equivalents in continuing operations at the end of the year 

Cash and cash equivalents in discontinued operations at the end of the year 

9 

14 

2019 
$000 

2018 
$000 

41,386 

(176) 

- 

(1,131) 

(7,090) 

 37,281 

(158) 

(69) 

(1,870) 

(3,896) 

32,989 

 31,288 

818 

27 

47 

 908 

- 

 3  

(27,380) 

(26,488) 

(13,688) 

(12,777) 

211 

17 

442 

(5,280) 

(1,776) 

(6,386) 

286  

- 

- 

(5,760) 

- 

(5,474) 

115 

 13,037 

19,455 

1,155 

20,725 

20,629 

96 

6,929 

(511) 

19,455 

19,182 

273 

 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
91 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Notes to consolidated financial statements 

1. General information 

JKX Oil & Gas plc (the ultimate parent of the Group hereafter, ‘the Company’) is a public limited company listed on the London Stock 
Exchange which is domiciled and incorporated in England and Wales under the UK Companies Act. The registered number of the 
Company is 3050645. The registered office is 6 Cavendish Square, London, W1G 0PD and the principal place of business is disclosed in 
the introduction to the Annual Report.  

The principal activities of the Company and its subsidiaries (the ‘Group’) are the exploration for, appraisal and development of oil and 
gas reserves.  

2. Basis of preparation 

The Group’s financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRSs’) as 
adopted by the European Union, IFRS Interpretations Committee (‘IFRS IC’) interpretations and the Companies Act 2006 applicable for 
Companies reporting under IFRS and therefore the consolidated financial statements comply with Article 4 of the EU IAS Regulations. 
The Group’s financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, as modified for derivative instruments held 
at fair value through profit or loss. The principal accounting policies adopted by the Group are set out below. 

Additionally, on 1 January 2019, the functional currency of the Group’s wholly owned Ukrainian subsidiary Poltava Petroleum 
Company (‘PPC’) changed from US Dollar ($) to Ukrainian Hryvnia (hryvnia). The change in the functional currency was considered 
appropriate as gas prices are denominated in hryvnia in a freely traded gas market and the increased impact of local market forces on 
gas prices, together with the increasing hryvnia cost base, development plan and availability of hryvnia draw downs in the Group’s 
facilities. As such, management concluded that hryvnia is the currency of the primary economic environment which the Company 
operates in. This change in functional currency is applied prospectively with effect from 1 January 2019. The exchange rate used to 
translate the balance sheet to reflect the change in functional currency on adoption is $1: 27.69 hryvnia.  

Comparative amounts in respect of property, plant and equipment and inventories have been reclassfied for comparability with 2019 in 
accordance with IFRS. The reclassifications had no impact on net assets or the profit for the period. 

Comparatives 
  In the 2018 Annual report a group of inventories  of $1.6m held for well workovers was included in inventories, whereas in 2019 

Annual report they were reclassified under property, plant and equipment to conform with 2019 presentation and to more 
appropriately reflect their nature. In 2019 Annual report 31 December 2018 inventories balance was reduced by $1.6m from $6.0m 
to $4.4m; property, plant and equipment balance was increased by $1.6m from $173.5m to $175.1m. 

Going concern 
The Directors note that the Group is debt free and has generated $33.0m of operating cash flow in 2019, continued its drilling program 
and ended the year with $20.6m of cash in continuing operations. The Board have reviewed the Group’s forecast cash flows for the 
period to June 2021. Capital and operating costs are based on approved budgets and latest forecasts in the case of 2020 and current 
development plans in the case of 2021. The forecast cash flows reviewed include scenarios where potential liabilities arise in relation to 
the rental fee claims in Ukraine (see Note 25 to the consolidated financial statements) including assessments of the timing of such 
potential payments undertaken following detailed analysis of Ukrainian legislation and the status of each claim with internal and 
external legal and tax experts.  Based on the Group’s cash flow forecasts, the Directors believe that the combination of its current cash 
balances, net cash flows from operations, as well as the anticipated availability of additional courses of action with respect to financing 
the settlement of any successful rental fee claims arising in the forecast period, mean that the Group will be able to meet its liabilities 
and commitments as they fall due across the forecast period. In addition, the Group benefits from an undrawn Tascombank loan facility 
of UAH280m ($11.8m) and overdraft facility of UAH50m ($2.1m) that were both renewed in December 2019, although each draw down 
is subject to credit approval by the bank. 

Notwithstanding the Group’s current financial performance and position, the Board are cognisant of the potential impacts of COVID-19 
on the Group. Whilst there has been little impact of COVID-19 on the Group’s operations at present there may be significant impacts on 
the business going forward which are currently unknown.  The Board has considered possible reverse stress case scenarios for the 
impact on the Group’s operations, financial position and forecasts.  Whilst the potential future impacts of Covid-19 are unknown the 
Board has considered operational disruption that may be caused by the factors such as a) restrictions applied by governments, illness 
amongst our workforce and disruption to supply chain and sales channels; b) market volatility in respect of commodity prices 
associated with Covid-19 in addition to geopolitical factors; and c) the Group’s ability to utilise its credit facilities.  

In addition to sensitivities that reflect future expectations regarding country, commodity price and currency risks that the Group may 
encounter, in March 2020 and to date, reverse stress tests have been run to reflect possible negative effects of COVID-19 including 
sustained lower commodity prices and one month production stop in both Russia and Ukraine.  None of the scenarios have recognised 
any possible future benefit that may result from the arbitration award (see Note 25 to the consolidated financial statements). Should 
the rental claims become payable during the forecast period, or more extended disruption to production occur, the Group would likely 
need to utilise the Tascom facilities, make forward gas sales, agree a payment plan with the tax authorities, or take other such measure 
as may be required. Whilst the Board anticipate being able to draw down under those facilities, draw down requests are subject to 
certain credit approval procedures by the bank and there can be no guarantee that such funding will be made available as and when 
required.  Similarly the Board anticipate being able to secure a payment arrangement with the tax authorities if needed, securing 
sufficient forward gas sales or taking other such measures as may be required but there can be no guarantee that these measures will 
be available when required or sufficient. 

 
 
92 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Notes to consolidated financial statements 

Having considered the forecasts and sensitivity scenarios the Board considers it is appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of 
accounting in preparing these financial statements. However, at the date of approval of these financial statements, the potential future 
impact of COVID-19 is uncertain and there can be no guarantee that the Group would receive credit approval for draw downs on the 
Tascom facilities, secure an appropriate payment plan arrangement for rental fee claims that fell due, secure sufficient forward gas 
sales or be able to take suitable other measures as required to maintain liquidity.  These circumstances indicate the existence of a 
material uncertainty which may cast significant doubt about the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern and therefore it may be 
unable to realise its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business.  As such this is considered to be a material 
uncertainty. The financial statements do not include the adjustments that would result if the Group was unable to continue as a going 
concern. 

Adoption of new and revised standards 
New standards, interpretations and amendments effective from 1 January 2019 
The disclosed policies have been applied consistently by the Group for both the current and previous financial year with the exception 
of the new standards adopted. 

The European Union (“EU”) IFRS financial information has been drawn up on the basis of accounting policies consistent with those 
applied in the financial statements for the year to 31 December 2018, except for the following:  

(a) 

(b) 

IFRS 16 ‘Leases’ 

IFRIC 23 ‘Uncertainty over Income Tax Positions’ 

(c)  Prepayment Features with Negative Compensation – Amendments to IFRS 9 

(d)  Long-term Interests in Associates and Joint Ventures – Amendments to IAS 28 

(e)  Annual Improvements to IFRS Standards 2015 – 2017 Cycle 

(f)  Plan Amendment, Curtailment or Settlement – Amendments to IAS 19 

The application of (b) to (f) has had no impact on the disclosures or the amounts recognised in the Group’s consolidated financial 
statements. 

There were no retrospective adjustments as a result of adopting IFRS 16 ‘Leases’. The Group amended accounting policies applied from 
1 January 2019 are disclosed in Note 3 under ‘Significant accounting policies’.  

IFRS 16 specifies how to recognise, measure, present and disclose leases. The standard provides a single lessee accounting model, 
requiring lessees to recognise right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for all material leases. It results in almost all leases being 
recognised on the balance sheet by lessees, as the distinction between operating and finance leases was removed. Under the new 
standard, an asset (the right to use the leased item) and a financial liability to pay rentals are recognised. The only exceptions are short-
term and low-value leases. The Group’s well service and rental arrangements in Ukraine for oil and gas extraction activities are outside 
of the scope of IFRS 16. 

The Group adopted IFRS 16 from 1 January 2019 using the modified retrospective approach and accordingly the information presented 
for 2018 is not restated. It remains as previously reported under IAS 17 and related interpretations. On initial application, the Group 
elected to record right-of-use assets based on the corresponding lease liability. A right-of-use asset and lease obligations of $3.1m were 
recorded as of 1 January 2019, with no net impact on retained earnings. When measuring lease liabilities, the Group discounted lease 
payments using its incremental borrowing rate at 1 January 2019. The weighted-average rate applied is 16%.  

The balance sheet shows the following amounts relating to leases: 

Oil and gas asset – coil tubing 

Properties 

Total  

Lease liabilities 

Current 

Non-current 

Total  

Right-of-use 
asset 
recognised 
during the 
year 

$’000 

Depreciation 
charge for 
the year 
$000 

31 December 
2019  
$000 

- 

446 

446 

(1,177) 

(332) 

(1,509) 

982 

1,021 

2,003 

1 January  
2019  
$000 

2,159 

907 

3,066 

31 December 
2019  
$000 

1,461 

628 

2,089 

 
 
 
 
 
93 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

The income statement shows the following amounts relating to leases: 

Interest on lease liabilities (included in finance cost) 

Expenses relating to short-term leases (included in administrative expenses) 

Expenses relating to low-value assets, excluding short-term leases of low-value assets (included in administrative 
expenses) 

Total  

Amounts recognised in the statement of cash flows 

Total cash outflow for leases 

31 December 
2019  
$000 

254 

235 

31 

520 

31 December 
2019  
$000 

1,776 

The following table reconciles the Group’s operating lease obligations at 31 December 2018, as disclosed in the Group’s consolidated 
financial statements, to the lease obligations recognised on initial application of IFRS 16 at 1 January 2019.  

Operating lease commitments at 31 December 2018 

Discounted using the incremental borrowing rate at 1 January 2018 

Effect of discounting 

Recognition exemption for short-term leases 

Assets that do not meet definition of a lease 

Impairment provision to be recognised on one of the properties 

$ 

3.9 

2.8 

0.4 

0.2 

0.1 

0.4 

Effective as of 1 January 2019, IFRIC 23 explains how to recognise and measure deferred and current income tax assets and liabilities 
where there is uncertainty over a tax treatment. An uncertain tax treatment is any tax treatment applied by the Group where there is 
uncertainty over whether that treatment will be accepted by the tax authority. IFRIC 23 applies to all aspects of income tax accounting 
where there is an uncertainty regarding the treatment of an item, including taxable profit or loss, the tax bases of assets and liabilities, 
tax losses and credits and tax rates. There was no impact on adoption of IFRIC 23 on 1 January 2019. 

New standards, interpretations and amendments not yet effective 
Below is a list of new and revised IFRSs that are not yet mandatorily effective (but allow early application) for the year ending 
31 December 2019 and have not been early adopted by the Group. These standards are not expected to have a material impact on the 
Group in the future reporting periods and on foreseeable future transactions. 

Amendments to IFRS 3, ‘Business combinations’ 

Amendments to IAS 1 and IAS 8: Definition of Material 

Effective for 
annual periods 
beginning on or 
after 

01-Jan-20 

01-Jan-20 

Amendments to References to the Conceptual Framework in IFRS Standards 

01-Jan-20 

IFRS 17, ‘Insurance contracts’ 

01-Jan-21 

3. Significant accounting policies 

Basis of consolidation 
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the financial statements of the Company and entities controlled by the Company (its 
subsidiaries) made up to 31 December each year. All intragroup balances, transactions, income and expenses and profits or losses, 
including unrealised profits arising from intragroup transactions, have been eliminated on consolidation. 

Subsidiaries are all entities (including structured entities) over which the Group has control. The Group controls an entity when the 
Group is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns 
through its power over the entity. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group. They 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
94 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Notes to consolidated financial statements 

are deconsolidated from the date that control ceases. The consolidated financial statements include all the assets, liabilities, revenues, 
expenses and cash flows of the Companies and their subsidiaries after eliminating intragroup transactions as noted above. Uniform 
accounting policies are applied across the Group. 

Year end for one of the Group’s subsidiary, JKX Oil & Gas (Jersey) Ltd, is non-contemporaneous with the Group’s year end, but its 
financial results are being consolidated at 31/12/2019. 

Foreign currencies     
All amounts in these financial statements are presented in thousands of US dollars, unless otherwise stated. The presentation currency 
of the Group is the US Dollar. 

Each entity in the Group is measured using the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (‘the 
functional currency’). Foreign currency transactions are translated into functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the 
dates of the transactions or valuation where items are re-measured. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement 
of such transactions and from translation at year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign 
currencies are recognised in the income statement. 

The effect of a change in functional currency is accounted for prospectively. The Group translates all items into the new functional 
currency using the exchange rate at the date of the change. The resulting translated amounts for non-monetary items are treated as 
their historical cost. 

On consolidation of subsidiaries and joint operations with a non US Dollar presentation currency, their statements of financial position 
are translated into US Dollar at the closing rate and income and expenses at the average monthly rate. All resulting exchange  
differences arising in the period are recognised in other comprehensive income, and cumulatively in the Group’s translation reserve. 
Such translation differences are reclassified to profit or loss in the period in which any such foreign operation is disposed of. 

Subsidiaries within the Group hold monetary intercompany balances for which settlement is neither planned nor likely to occur in the 
foreseeable future and thus this is considered to be part of the Group’s net investment in the relevant subsidiary. An exchange 
difference arises on translation in the company income statement which on consolidation is recognised in equity, only being recognised 
in the income statement on the disposal of the net investment. 

The major exchange rates used for the revaluation of the closing statement of financial position at 31 December 2019 were $1:£0.76 
(2018: $1:£0.78), $1: 23.69 Hryvnia (2018: $1: 27.69 Hryvnia), $1: 61.91Roubles (2018: $1: 69.47 Roubles), $1: 294.43 Hungarian Forint 
(2018: $1: 280.31 Hungarian Forint). 

Goodwill and fair value adjustments arising on acquisition are treated as assets/liabilities of the foreign entity and translated at the 
closing rate. 

Property, plant and equipment and other intangible assets 
Property plant and equipment comprises the Group’s tangible oil and gas assets together with computer equipment, motor vehicles and 
other equipment and are carried at cost, less any accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses. Cost includes purchase 
price and construction costs for qualifying assets, together with borrowing costs where applicable, in accordance with the Group’s 
accounting policy. Depreciation of these assets commences when the assets are ready for their intended use. 

Oil and gas assets 
Exploration, evaluation and development expenditure is accounted for under the ‘successful efforts’ method. The successful efforts 
method means that only costs which relate directly to the discovery and development of specific oil and gas reserves are capitalised. 

Exploration and evaluation costs are valued at costs less accumulated impairment losses and capitalised within intangible assets. 
Development expenditure on producing assets is accounted for in accordance with IAS 16, ‘Property, plant and equipment’. Costs 
incurred prior to obtaining legal rights to explore are expensed immediately to the income statement. 

All lease and licence acquisition costs, geological and geophysical costs and other direct costs of exploration, evaluation and 
development are capitalised as intangible assets or property plant and equipment according to their nature. Intangible assets are not 
amortised and comprise costs relating to the exploration and evaluation of properties which the Directors consider to be unevaluated 
until reserves are appraised as commercial, at which time they are transferred to property plant and equipment following an 
impairment review and are depreciated accordingly. Where properties are appraised to have no commercial value, the associated costs 
are treated as an impairment loss in the period in which the determination is made. 

Costs related to hydrocarbon production activities including production plants and capital spares are depreciated on a field by field 
unit of production method based on commercial proved plus probable reserves of the production licence, except in the case of assets 
whose useful life differs from the lifetime of the field, which are depreciated on a straight-line basis over their anticipated useful life of 
up to 10 years.  

For assets under construction depreciation begins when the assets are available for use and continues until the assets are derecognised, 
even if it is idle. 

The calculation of the ‘unit of production’ depreciation takes account of estimated future development costs. The ‘unit of production’ 
rate is set at the beginning of each accounting period. Changes in reserves and cost estimates are recognised prospectively applied from 
the date of the Board approval of revised field development plans. 

 
95 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Other assets 
Depreciation is charged so as to write off the cost, less estimated residual value, over their estimated useful lives, using the straight-
line method, for the following classes of assets: 

Motor vehicles 

Computer equipment 

Other equipment 

- 4 years 

- 3 years 

- 5 to 10 years 

The estimated useful lives of property plant and equipment and their residual values are reviewed on an annual basis and, if necessary, 
changes in useful lives are accounted for prospectively. Assets under construction are not subject to depreciation until the date on 
which the Group makes them available for use. 

The gain or loss arising on the disposal or retirement of an asset is determined as the difference between the sales proceeds and the 
carrying amount of the asset and is recognised in the income statement for the relevant period. 

Business combinations  
The acquisition of subsidiaries is accounted for using the purchase method. The cost of the acquisition is measured at the aggregate of 
the fair values, at the date of exchange, of assets given, liabilities incurred or assumed and equity instruments issued by the Group in 
exchange for control of the acquiree. The acquiree’s identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities that meet the criteria for 
recognition under IFRS 3 (revised) are recognised at their fair value at the acquisition date. In a business combination achieved in 
stages, the previously held equity interest in the acquiree is re-measured at its acquisition date fair value and the resulting gain or loss, 
if any, is recognised in the income statement. Acquisition costs are expensed.  

Goodwill is recognised as an asset and is initially measured at cost being the excess of the cost of the business combination over the 
Group’s share in the net fair value of the acquiree’s identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities. After initial recognition, 
goodwill is measured at cost less any accumulated impairment losses. Goodwill impairment reviews are undertaken annually or more 
frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate a potential impairment. Impairment losses on goodwill are not reversed.  

On disposal of a subsidiary or joint arrangement, the attributable amount of unamortised goodwill, which has not been subject to 
impairment, is included in the determination of the profit or loss on disposal. 

Non-current assets held for sale and discontinued operations 
A discontinued operation is a component of the entity that has been disposed of or is classified as held for sale and that represents a 
separate major line of business or geographical area of operations, is part of a single co-ordinated plan to dispose of such a line of 
business or area of operations, or is a subsidiary acquired exclusively with a view to resale.  

Non-current assets (or disposal groups) are classified as held for sale if their carrying amount will be recovered principally through a 
sale transaction rather than through continuing use and a sale is considered highly probable. They are measured at the lower of their 
carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell, except for assets such as deferred tax assets, and financial assets within the scope of 
IFRS 9, which are specifically exempt from this requirement. An asset classified as held for sale is not depreciated. 

Non-current assets classified as held for sale and the assets of a disposal group classified as held for sale are presented separately from 
the other assets in the statement of financial position. The liabilities of a disposal group classified as held for sale are presented 
separately from other liabilities in the statement of financial position. 

Any gain or loss from disposal, together with the results of these operations until the date of disposal, is reported separately as 
discontinued operations. The financial information of discontinued operations is excluded from the respective captions in the 
Consolidated financial statements and related notes for all periods presented. Comparatives in the statement of financial position are 
not represented when a non-current asset or disposal group is classified as held for sale. Comparatives are represented for 
presentation of discontinued operations in the Statement of cash flow and Statement of comprehensive income. Further information 
on discontinued operations and non-current assets held for sale can be found in note 14 “Discontinued operations and assets classified 
as held for sale”. 

Impairment of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets  
Whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable, the Group reviews the 
carrying amounts of its property, plant and equipment and intangible assets to determine whether there is any indication that those 
assets have suffered an impairment loss. Individual assets are grouped together as a cash-generating unit for impairment assessment 
purposes at the lowest level at which their identifiable cash flows, that are largely independent of the cash flows of the other Groups 
assets, can be determined. A cash-generating unit is the smallest group of assets that independently generates cash flow and whose 
cash flow is largely independent of the cash flows generated by other assets. 

If any such indication of impairment exists the Group makes an estimate of its recoverable amount. 

The recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs of disposal and value in use. Where the carrying amount of an individual 
asset or a cash-generating unit exceeds its recoverable amount, the asset/cash-generating unit is considered impaired and is written 
down to its recoverable amount. Fair value less costs of disposal is determined by discounting the post-tax cash flows expected to be 
generated by the cash-generating unit, net of associated selling costs, and takes into account assumptions market participants would 

 
 
 
 
96 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Notes to consolidated financial statements 

use in estimating fair value. In assessing the value in use, the estimated future cash flows are adjusted for the risks specific to the 
asset/cash-generating unit and are discounted to their present value that reflects the current market indicators. 

Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset/cash-generating unit is increased to the revised 
estimate of its recoverable amount, but so that the increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have 
been determined had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset (cash-generating unit) in prior years. A reversal of an 
impairment loss is recognised as income immediately.  

Borrowing costs 
Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of qualifying assets, which are assets that 
necessarily take a substantial period of time to get ready for their intended use or sale, are added to the cost of those assets, until such 
time as the assets are substantially ready for their intended use or sale. To the extent that variable rate borrowings are used to finance 
a qualifying asset and are hedged in an effective cash flow hedge of interest rate risk, the effective portion of the derivative is 
recognised in other comprehensive income and reclassified to profit or loss when the qualifying asset impacts profit or loss. To the 
extent that fixed rate borrowings are used to finance a qualifying asset and are hedged in an effective fair value hedge of interest rate 
risk, the capitalised borrowing costs reflect the hedged interest rate. Investment income earned on the temporary investment of 
specific borrowings pending their expenditure on qualifying assets is deducted from the borrowing costs eligible for capitalisation. 
All other borrowing costs are recognised in profit or loss in the period in which they are incurred. 

JKX Employee Benefit Trust 
The JKX Employee Benefit Trust was established in 2014 to hold ordinary shares purchased to satisfy various new share scheme 
awards made to the employees of the Company which will be transferred to the members of the scheme on their respective vesting 
dates subject to satisfying the performance conditions of each scheme.  

Financial instruments 
Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised in the consolidated statement of financial position when the Group becomes 
party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. 

Convertible bonds due 2020 – embedded derivative 
The net proceeds received from the issue of convertible bonds at the date of issue have been split between two elements: the host debt       
instrument classified as a financial liability in Borrowings, and the embedded derivative.  

The fair value of the embedded derivative has been calculated first and the residual value is assigned to the host debt liability. The 
difference between the proceeds of issue of the convertible bonds and the fair value assigned to the embedded derivative, representing 
the value of the host debt instrument, is included as Borrowings and is not remeasured. The host debt component is then carried at 
amortised cost and the fair value of the embedded derivative is determined at inception and at each reporting date with the fair value 
changes being recognised in profit or loss. 

Issue costs are apportioned between the host debt element (included in Borrowings) and the derivative component of the convertible 
bond based on their relative carrying amounts at the date of issue.  

The interest expense on the component included in Borrowings is calculated by applying the effective interest method, with interest 
recognised on an effective yield basis. 

Upon redemption of convertible bonds by the Company in the market, the difference between the repurchase cost and the total of the 
carrying amount of the liability plus the repurchased embedded option to convert is recorded in the income statement.  

Equity investments at fair value through other comprehensive income (FVOCI) 
Investments in unquoted equity instruments were previously measured at cost less impairment as allowed by IAS 39. As of 1 January 
2018 investments in equity instruments were reclassified to financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income. The 
Group has made an irrevocable election at the time of initial recognition to account for the equity investment at fair value through 
other comprehensive income (FVOCI). Movements in the carrying amount are taken through OCI, except for the recognition of 
impairment gains or losses, interest and dividends income and foreign exchange gains and losses which are recognised in profit or loss. 
There was no impact of reclassification on the carrying value of its unlisted investment. Please refer to Note 6 for details. 

Borrowings 
Borrowings are initially measured at fair value, net of transaction costs and are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the 
effective interest method, with interest expense recognised on an effective yield basis. The effective interest method is a method of 
calculating the amortised cost of a financial liability and of allocating interest expense over the relevant period. 

The effective interest rate is the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments through the expected life of the financial 
liability, or, where appropriate, a shorter period. 

Trade and other receivables  
Trade and other receivables are recognised initially at their transaction price in accordance with IFRS 9 and are subsequently 
measured at amortised cost. The Group applies the simplified approach to providing for expected credit losses (ECL) prescribed by IFRS 
9, which permits the use of the lifetime expected loss provision for all trade receivables. Expected credit losses are assessed on a 
forward looking basis. The loss allowance is measured at initial recognition and throughout its life at an amount equal to lifetime ECL. 
Any impairment is recognised in the income statement within ‘Administrative expenses’. 

 
97 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Cash and cash equivalents 
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash in hand and current balances with banks and similar institutions, which are readily 
convertible to known amounts of cash. Cash equivalents are short-term with an original maturity of less than 3 months. 

Restricted cash 
Restricted cash is disclosed separately on the face of the statement of financial position and denoted as restricted when it is not under 
the exclusive control of the Group.  

Trade and other payables 
Trade and other payables are initially measured at fair value, and are subsequently measured at amortised cost, using the effective 
interest rate method if the time value of money is significant. 

Financial liabilities and equity 
Financial liabilities and equity instruments are classified according to the substance of the contractual arrangements entered into. An 
equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of the Group after deducting all of its liabilities. Equity 
instruments issued by the Company are recorded at the proceeds received net of direct issue costs. 

Inventories 
Inventory is comprised of produced oil and gas and certain materials and equipment that are acquired for future use such as: parts for 
cars/trucks, field maintenance, overalls, hand-tools, general materials, accessories, small value parts for production equipment. The oil 
and gas is valued at the lower of average production cost and net realisable value; the materials and equipment inventory is valued at 
purchase cost. Cost comprises direct materials and, where applicable, direct labour costs plus attributable overheads based on a normal 
level of activity and other costs associated in bringing the inventories to their present location and condition. Cost is calculated using 
the weighted average method. Net realisable value represents the estimated selling price less all estimated costs of completion and 
costs to be incurred in marketing, selling and distribution and any provisions for obsolescence. 

Taxation 
Income tax expense represents the sum of current tax payable and deferred tax. 

The current tax payable is based on taxable profit for the year. Taxable profit differs from net profit as reported in the income 
statement because it excludes items of income or expense that are taxable or deductible in other years and it further excludes items 
that are never taxable or deductible. The Group’s liability for current tax is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or 
substantively enacted by the reporting date.  

Tax is charged or credited in the income statement, except when it relates to items charged or credited directly to equity or in other                  
comprehensive income, in which case the tax is also dealt with in equity or other comprehensive income respectively. 

Deferred tax is the tax expected to be payable or recoverable on differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities in the 
financial statements and the corresponding tax base used in the computation of taxable profit. Deferred tax liabilities are generally 
recognised for all taxable temporary differences and deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable 
profits will be available against which deductible temporary differences can be utilised. Such assets and liabilities are not recognised if 
the temporary difference arises from goodwill or from the initial recognition (other than in a business combination) of other assets and 
liabilities in a transaction that affects neither the tax profit nor the accounting profit.  

Deferred tax liabilities are recognised for taxable temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries, and interests in joint 
ventures, except where the Group is able to control the reversal of the temporary difference and it is probable that the temporary 
difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future. 

The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each reporting date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable 
that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the asset to be recovered. Any such reduction shall be reversed to 
the extent that it becomes probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available. 

Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period when the liability is settled or the asset realised 
based on tax rates and laws substantively enacted by the reporting date. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there exists 
a legal and enforceable right to offset and they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority and the Group intends to 
settle its current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis. 

Segmental reporting  
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the Chief Operating Decision Maker. 
The Chief Operating Decision Maker, who is responsible for allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating segments, 
has been identified as the Executive Directors of the Group that make the strategic decisions.  

Pension obligations 
The liability recognised in the balance sheet in respect of defined benefit pension plans is the present value of the defined benefit 
obligation at the end of the reporting period. The defined benefit obligation is calculated annually by an independent actuary using the 
projected unit credit method. 

The present value of the defined benefit obligation is determined by discounting the estimated future cash outflows using interest 
rates of government bonds that are denominated in the currency in which the benefits will be paid (hryvnia), and that have terms 
approximating to the terms of the related obligation. Currently, there is no sufficiently developed market of bonds denominated in 

 
 
 
98 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Notes to consolidated financial statements 

hryvnia with a sufficiently long period of repayment which would be consistent with an estimated period of payment of all benefits. In 
such cases the Standard allows using current market rates to discount respective short-term payments and calculating the discount 
rate for long-term liabilities by extending the current market rates along the yield curve. 

The current service cost of the defined benefit plan, recognised in the Income Statement, except where included in the cost of an asset, 
reflects the increase in the defined benefit obligation resulting from employee service in the current year, benefit changes 
curtailments and settlements. Past-service costs are recognised immediately in the Income Statement. 

The net interest cost is calculated by applying the discount rate to the net balance of the defined benefit obligation. This cost is 
included in employee benefit expense in the statement of profit or loss. 

Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions are charged or credited to equity 
in other comprehensive income in the period in which they arise. 

Share options 
The group operates an equity-settled, share-based compensation plan, under which the Company receives services from Senior 
Management as consideration for equity instruments (options) of the group. The fair value of the services received from Senior 
Management in exchange for the grant of the options is recognised as an expense. The total amount to be expensed is determined by 
reference to the fair value of the options granted: 

  including any market performance conditions; (for example, the Company's share price); 

  excluding the impact of any service and non-market performance vesting conditions (for example, profitability, sales growth targets 

and remaining an employee of the entity over a specified time period); and 

  including the impact of any non-vesting conditions (for example, the requirement for employees to save). 

Non-market performance and service conditions are included in assumptions about the number of options that are expected to vest. 
The total expense is recognised over the vesting period, which is the period over which all of the specified vesting conditions are to be 
satisfied. 

In addition, in some circumstances employees may provide services in advance of the grant date and therefore the grant date fair value 
is estimated for the purposes of recognising the expense during the period between service commencement period and grant date. 

At the end of each reporting period, the group revises its estimates of the number of options that are expected to vest based on the non-
market vesting conditions. It recognises the impact of the revision to original estimates, if any, in the income statement, with a 
corresponding adjustment to equity. 

When the options are exercised, the company issues new shares or shares held by the JKX Employee Benefit Trust. The proceeds 
received net of any directly attributable transaction costs are credited to share capital (nominal value) and share premium. 

The grant by the Company of options over its equity instruments to the employees of subsidiary undertakings in the group is treated as 
a capital contribution. The fair value of employee services received, measured by reference to the grant date fair value, is recognised 
over the vesting period as an increase to investment in subsidiary undertakings, with a corresponding credit to equity in the parent 
entity financial statements. 

The social security contributions payable in connection with the grant of the share options is considered an integral part of the grant 
itself, and the change will be treated as a cash-settled transaction. 

The rules regarding the scheme are described in the Remuneration Report on pages 67 and 68 and in Note 24 on share based payments. 

Bonus scheme 
The Group operates a bonus scheme for its employees. The bonus payments are made annually, normally in January of each year and the 
costs are accrued in the period to which they relate. 

Pension costs 
The Group contributes to the individual pension scheme of the qualifying employees’ choice. Contributions are charged to the income 
statement as they become payable. The Group has no further payment obligations once the contributions have been paid. 

Decommissioning  
Provision is made for the cost of decommissioning assets at the time when the obligation to decommission arises. Such provision 
represents the estimated discounted liability for costs which are expected to be incurred in removing production facilities and site 
restoration at the end of the producing life of each field. A corresponding item of property plant and equipment is also created at an 
amount equal to the provision. This is subsequently depreciated as part of the capital costs of the production facilities. Any change in 
the present value of the estimated expenditure attributable to changes in the estimates of the cash flow or the current estimate of the 
discount rate used are reflected as an adjustment to the provision and the property plant and equipment. Discount rates are based on 
governmental bonds which will be redeemed around the end of field life. The unwinding of the discount is recognised as a finance cost. 

Provisions  
Provisions are created where the Group has a present obligation as a result of a past event, where it is probable that it will result in an 
outflow of economic benefits to settle the obligation, and where it can be reliably measured.  

 
99 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Provisions are measured at the best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the obligation at the balance sheet date, and are 
discounted to present value where the effect is material. Where amounts provided for attract interest reflecting the appropriate time 
value of money no discounting is applicable. The amounts provided are based on the Group’s best estimate of the likely committed 
outflow.  

Amounts received in advance for future gas sales are recorded as contract liabilities and revenue is recognised as the performance 
obligations are met. 

Revenue recognition 
Revenue from contracts with customers is recognised when or as the Group satisfies a performance obligation by transferring a 
promised good or service to a customer. A good or service is transferred when the customer obtains control of that good or service. The 
transfer of control of oil, natural gas, LPG, condensate, and other items sold by the Group usually coincides with title passing to the 
customer and the customer taking physical possession. The Group principally satisfies its performance obligations at a point in time 
and the amounts of revenue recognised relating to performance obligations satisfied over time are not material.  

Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received, excluding discounts, rebates, value added tax (“VAT”) and other 
sales taxes or duty. Production based taxes are not included in revenue, they are paid on production and recorded within cost of sales. 

Amounts received in advance for future gas sales are recorded as contract liabilities and revenue is recognised as the performance 
obligations are met. 

Share capital and treasury shares 
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of ordinary shares are recognised as a 
deduction from share premium, net of any tax effects.  

When share capital recognised as equity is repurchased, the amount of the consideration paid, which includes directly attributable 
costs, net of any tax effects, is recognised in retained earnings.  

Repurchased JKX Oil & Gas plc shares are classified as treasury shares in shareholders’ equity and are presented in the retained 
earnings. The consideration paid, including any directly attributable incremental costs is deducted from equity attributable to the 
Company’s equity holders until the shares are cancelled or reissued.  

When treasury shares are sold or reissued subsequently, the amount received is recognised as an increase in equity, and the resulting 
surplus or deficit on the transaction is presented in share premium. No gain or loss is recognised in the financial statements on the 
purchase, sale, issue or cancellation of treasury shares. 

Leases 
At inception of a contract, the Group assesses whether a contract is, or contains, a lease based on whether the contract conveys the 
right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration.  

The Group recognises a right-of-use asset and a lease liability at the lease commencement date. The right-of-use asset is initially 
measured based on the initial amount of the lease liability adjusted for any lease payments made at or before the commencement date, 
plus any initial direct costs incurred and an estimate of costs to dismantle and remove the underlying asset or to restore the underlying 
asset or the site on which it is located, less any lease incentives received.  

The asset is depreciated to the earlier of the end of the useful life of the right-of-use asset or the lease term using the straight-line 
method as this most closely reflects the expected pattern of consumption of the future economic benefits. The lease term includes 
periods covered by an option to extend if the Group is reasonably certain to exercise that option. Lease terms range from two to three 
years for oil and gas equipment and offices. Service agreements for equipment on the working sites are not considered leases as, based 
upon an assessment of the terms and nature of their contractual arrangements, the contracts do not convey the right to control the use 
of an identified asset. In addition, the right-of-use asset is periodically reduced by impairment losses, if any, and adjusted for certain 
remeasurements of the lease liability.  

The lease liability is initially measured at the present value of the lease payments that are not paid at the commencement date, 
discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease or, if that rate cannot be readily determined, the Group’s incremental borrowing 
rate. Generally, the Group uses its incremental borrowing rate as the discount rate. The lease liability is measured at amortised cost 
using the effective interest method. It is remeasured when there is a change in future lease payments arising from a change in an index 
or rate, if there is a change in the Group’s estimate of the amount expected to be payable under a residual value guarantee, or if the 
Group changes its assessment of whether it will exercise a purchase, extension or termination option. When the lease liability is 
remeasured in this way, a corresponding adjustment is made to the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset, or the effect is recorded 
in profit or loss if the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset has been reduced to zero.  

The Group elected to apply the practical expedient not to recognise right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for short-term leases that 
have a lease term of 12 months or less and leases of low-value assets. The Group also made use of the practical expedient to not 
recognise a right-of-use asset or a lease liability for leases for which the lease term ends within 12 months of the date of initial 
application. 

The lease payments associated with these leases are recognised as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.  

 
 
 
100 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Notes to consolidated financial statements 

The Group did not elect to apply the practical expedient to grandfather the assessment of which transactions are leases on the date of 
initial application, as previously assessed under IAS 17 and IFRIC 4. The Group applied the definition of a lease under IFRS 16 to all 
existing contracts. 

Dividends 
Interim dividends are recognised when they are paid to the Company’s shareholders. Final dividends are recognised when they are 
approved by shareholders.  

Exceptional items  
Exceptional items comprise items of income and expense, including tax items, that are material either because of their size or their 
nature and unlikely to recur and which merit separate disclosure in order to provide an understanding of the Group’s underlying 
financial performance. Examples of events which may give rise to the disclosure of material items of income and expense as 
exceptional items include, but are not limited to litigation claims by or against the Group and the restructuring of components of the 
Group’s operations. Exceptional items are disclosed separately on the face of the income statement. 

Critical accounting estimates, assumptions and judgements 
The Group makes estimates, assumptions and judgements concerning the future. The resulting accounting estimates will, by definition, 
seldom equal the related actual results. The estimates, assumptions and judgements that have a risk of causing material adjustment to 
the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are discussed below. 

a) Recoverability of oil and gas assets and intangible oil and gas costs (Note 5 (a)) 
Costs capitalised as oil and gas assets in property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets are assessed for impairment when 
circumstances suggest that the carrying value may exceed its recoverable value. As part of this assessment, management has carried 
out an impairment test (ceiling test) on the oil and gas assets classified as property, plant and equipment, where indicators of 
impairment have been identified on a CGU. This test compares the carrying value of the assets at the reporting date with the expected 
discounted cash flows from each project prepared under the fair value less cost of disposal approach. For the discounted cash flows to 
be calculated, management has used a production profile based on its best estimate of proven and probable reserves of the assets and a 
range of assumptions, including an internal oil and gas price profile benchmarked to mean analysts’ consensus and third party 
estimates and a discount rate which, taking into account other assumptions used in the calculation, management considers to be 
reflective of the risks. This assessment involves judgement as to (i) the likely commerciality of the asset, (ii) proven, probable (‘2P’) 
reserves which are estimated using standard recognised evaluation techniques (iii) future revenues and estimated development costs 
pertaining to the asset, (iv) the discount rate to be applied for the purposes of deriving a recoverable value including estimates of the 
relevant levels of risk premiums applied to the assets. In cases where impairment tests demonstrate headroom, reversals of 
impairment charges are not recognised in the Group income statement if the existence of the headroom is sensitive to pricing, 
production or discount rates.  

b) Depreciation of oil and gas assets (Note 5 (a)) 
Oil and gas assets held in property, plant and equipment are mainly depreciated on a unit of production basis at a rate calculated by 
reference to proved plus probable reserves and incorporating the estimated future cost of developing and extracting those reserves. 
Future development costs are estimated using assumptions as to the numbers of wells required to produce those reserves, the cost of 
the wells, future production facilities and operating costs; together with assumptions on oil and gas realisations based on the approved 
field development plans. 

c) Taxation including rental fees and deferred tax assets (Notes 25 and 26) 
Tax provisions are recognised when it is considered probable that there will be a future outflow of funds to the tax authorities. In this 
case, provision is made/reversed for the amount that is expected to be settled or won. The provision is updated at each reporting date 
by management by interpretation and application of known local tax laws with the assistance of established legal, tax and accounting 
advisors. These interpretations can change over time depending on precedent set and circumstances. In addition new laws can come 
into effect which can conflict with others and, therefore, are subject to varying interpretations and changes which may be applied 
retrospectively. A change in estimate of the likelihood of a future outflow or in the expected amount to be settled would result in a 
charge or credit to income in the period in which the change occurs.  

Tax provisions are based on enacted or substantively enacted laws. To the extent that these change there would be a charge or credit to 
income both in the period of charge, which would include any impact on cumulative provisions, and in future periods.  

Deferred tax assets are recognised only to the extent it is considered probable that those assets will be recoverable. This involves an 
assessment of when those deferred tax assets are likely to reverse, and a judgement as to whether or not there will be sufficient 
taxable profits available to offset the tax assets when they do reverse. This requires assumptions regarding future profitability and is 
therefore inherently uncertain. To the extent assumptions regarding future profitability change, there can be an increase or decrease 
in the level of deferred tax assets recognised that can result in a charge or credit in the period in which the change occurs.  

d) Provisions for decommissioning costs (Note 18) 
Estimates of the cost of future decommissioning and restoration of production facilities are based on current legal and constructive 
requirements, technology and price levels, while estimates of when decommissioning will occur depend on assumptions made 
regarding the economic life of fields which in turn depend on such factors as oil and gas prices, decommissioning costs, discount rates 
and inflation rates. Management reviewed the estimation process and the basis for the principal assumptions underlying the cost 
estimates, noting in particular the reasons for any major changes in estimates as compared with the previous year. The Group was 

 
101 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

satisfied that the approach applied was fair and reasonable. The Group was also satisfied that the discount and inflation rates used to 
calculate the provision were appropriate. The discount rates were based on government bonds issued in the respective countries. 

e) Judgement used in the fair value of unlisted investments (Note 6) 
The fair value of financial instruments that are not traded in an active market is determined by using valuation techniques. The 
objective of a fair value measurement is to estimate the price at which an orderly transaction would take place between market 
participants under the market conditions that exist at the measurement date. IFRS 13 requires that valuation techniques maximise the 
use of observable inputs and minimise the use of unobservable inputs. The Group has used a market approach to estimate fair value of 
the unlisted investments. The Group used its judgements to (i) select a valuation method, (ii) make assumptions that are based on 
market conditions existing at the end of the reporting period, (iii) determine the point in a range of values that is ‘most representative 
of a fair value’, (iv) determine discounts applied to the fair value.  

f) Enforcement of arbitration award (Note 25) 
No asset has been recognised in respect of the arbitration award due to the uncertainty inherent in the process for, and likely success 
of, enforcing collection.  

g) Exceptional items (Notes 18 and 25) 
Judgment is required when determining whether items meet the definition of ‘exceptional’ under the Group’s accounting policy.  

Provisions and reversals for August to December 2010 and January to December 2015 rental fee claims have been included in 
‘exceptional items’ due to their material, specific and unusual nature and the Board considered that it was appropriate to highlight 
these items to users of the financial statements. In particular, the issues are considered to represent isolated historical disputes that 
will not recur having related to specific circumstances and discrete periods of time with production based taxes currently paid at 
standard Ukrainian government rates. Whilst the Board is cognisant that items should not be disclosed as exceptional when they recur, 
in this instance the Board considered items to be exceptional, because the underlying claims are not anticipated to recur and the 
additional charges refer to accrual of interest and penalties of the original claims.  

4. Segmental analysis 

The Group has one single class of business, being the exploration for, evaluation, development and production of oil and gas reserves. 
Accordingly the reportable operating segments are determined by the geographical location of the assets and, therefore all information 
is being presented for geographical segments. This is consistent with the revenue information that is disclosed for each reportable 
segment under IFRS 8 Operating Segments. 

There are four (2018: four) reportable operating segments which are based on the internal reports provided to the Chief Operating 
Decision Maker (‘CODM’). Ukraine and Russia segments are involved with production and exploration; the ‘Rest of World’ are involved 
in exploration, development and production and the UK is the home of the head office and purchases material, capital assets and 
services on behalf of other segments.  

The Group derives revenue from the transfer of goods at a point in time.  

Segment revenue, segment expense and segment results include transfers between segments. Those transfers are eliminated on 
consolidation. 

Segment results and assets include items directly attributable to the segment. Segment assets consist primarily of property, plant and 
equipment, inventories and receivables. Capital expenditures comprise additions to property, plant and equipment and intangible 
assets. 

 
 
 
 
 
102 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Notes to consolidated financial statements 

2019 

External revenue 

Revenue by location of asset: 

– Oil 

– Gas 

– Liquefied petroleum gas 

– Other 

Inter segment revenue: 

– Management services/other 

Total revenue 

Profit/(loss) before tax: 

UK 
$000 

Ukraine 
$000 

Russia 
$000 

Rest of 
World1 
$000 

Sub Total 
$000 

Eliminations 
$000 

Total 
$000 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

24,339   

701 

52,319 

16,750 

6,562 

1,055 

-  

18 

84,275 

17,469 

1,650 

1,650 

1,650 

- 

- 

- 

- 

84,275 

17,469 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

25,040  

69,069 

6,562   

1,073 

101,744 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

25,040  

69,069 

6,562   

1,073 

101,744 

1,650 

1,650 

(1,650) 

(1,650) 

- 

- 

103,394 

(1,650) 

101,744 

Profit/(loss) from operations 

(6,922) 

37,544 

1,052 

(236) 

31,438 

112 

31,550 

Finance income 

Finance cost 

Derivative liability written-off 

Assets 

Property, plant and equipment 

  365 

116,734 

  98,629 

857   

(2,054) 

62 

- 

- 

- 

857 

(2,054) 

62 

30,303 

112 

30,415 

Investment 

Deferred tax 

Inventories 

Trade and other receivables 

Cash and cash equivalents 

Total assets1 

Total liabilities1 

500 

 - 

 - 

349 

 9,496 

- 

- 

(172) 

 8,184 

5,295 

1,603 

9,571  

  1,620 

1,973 

1,414 

10,714 

133,027 

111,820 

- 

- 

- 

- 

6 

148 

154 

215,728  

500 

  8,012 

6,915 

3,931 

20,629 

255,715 

(7,323) 

(57,980) 

(7,027) 

(30) 

(72,360) 

Non cash expense (other than depreciation 
and impairment) 
Exceptional item – net reversal of 
provision for production based taxes 
Increase in property, plant and equipment 
and intangible assets 

229 

214 

118 

- 

 - 

8,410 

- 

20,850  

9,104 

Depreciation, depletion and amortisation 

246 

13,049 

5,922  

- 

- 

 - 

- 

561 

8,410 

29,954 

19,217 

1  Total assets and liabilities exclude assets and liabilities of the Hungarian disposal group classified as held for sale. Please refer to Note 14 for details. 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

215,728 

500 

8,012 

6,915   

3,931 

20,629 

255,715 

(72,360) 

561 

8,410 

29,954  

19,217 

Major customers 

Ukraine 

Russia 

2019 

$000 

- 

17,231 

2018 
$000 

18,131 

16,911 

There is one customer in Russia that exceeds 10% of the Group’s total revenues (2018: two customers, one in Ukraine  
and one in Russia). 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
103 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

2018 

External revenue 

Revenue by location of asset: 

– Oil 

– Gas 

– Liquefied petroleum gas 

– Other 

Inter segment revenue: 

– Management services/other 

Total revenue 

Profit/(loss) before tax: 

UK 
$000 

Ukraine 
$000 

Russia 
$000 

Rest of 
World1 
$000 

Sub Total 
$000 

Eliminations 
$000 

Total 
$000 

- 

- 

- 

112 

112 

3,523 

3,523 

19,341  

679  

49,221  

17,155  

5,579  

781 

-  

5 

74,922 

17,839 

- 

- 

- 

- 

3,635 

74,922 

17,839 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

20,020  

66,376 

5,579  

898 

92,873 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

20,020  

66,376 

5,579  

898 

92,873 

3,523 

3,523 

(3,523) 

(3,523) 

- 

- 

96,396 

(3,523) 

92,873 

Profit/(loss) from operations 

(6,106) 

20,979 

(104) 

(817) 

13,952 

1,724 

15,676 

Finance income 

Finance cost 

Fair value movement on derivative 
liability 

Assets 

908  

(2,510) 

(59) 

- 

- 

- 

 908 

(2,510) 

(59) 

12,291 

1,724 

14,015 

Property, plant and equipment 

 211  

 91,836  

 82,331 

734 

 175,112 

Deferred tax 

Inventories 

Trade and other receivables 

 -    

 -    

736  

966 

  9,453 

2,851  

2,502 

1,501  

1,864  

- 

- 

9 

  10,419 

4,352   

5,111 

Cash and cash equivalents 

 13,344  

 3,493  

 2,265  

80 

19,182 

Total assets1 

Total liabilities1 

14,291 

101,648 

97,414 

823 

214,176 

(12,580) 

(56,857) 

(3,481) 

(38) 

 (72,956) 

Non cash expense (other than depreciation 
and impairment) 

Exceptional item – production based taxes 

Increase in property, plant and equipment 
and intangible assets 

- 

-  

 - 

673 

5,055 

11,011  

80 

-  

742 

Depreciation, depletion and amortisation 

58  

9,210 

5,887 

6 

-  

 - 

- 

759 

5,055  

11,753 

15,155 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

-  

-  

-  

-  

 175,112 

10,419 

4,352   

5,111 

19,182 

214,176 

(72,956) 

759 

5,055 

11,753  

15,155 

1  Total assets and liabilities exclude assets and liabilities of the Hungarian disposal group classified as held for sale. Please refer to Note 14 for details. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
104 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Notes to consolidated financial statements 

5. Property, plant and equipment and Intangible assets 

5.(a) Property, plant and equipment 

2019 

Group 

Cost 

At 1 January 

Application of IFRS 16 – Right-of-use assets 

Additions during the year 

Foreign exchange  

Disposal of property, plant and equipment 

At 31 December 

Accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortisation and 
provision for impairment 

At 1 January 

Depreciation on disposals of property, plant and equipment 

Foreign exchange  

Depreciation charge for the year 

At 31 December 

Carrying amount 

At 1 January 

At 31 December 

Oil and gas 
fields  
Ukraine 
$000 

Gas field  
Russia  
$000 

Other assets 
$000 

Total 
$000 

578,094 

192,952 

17,755 

788,801 

- 

19,924 

99,454 

- 

2,159 

8,887 

23,579 

(10) 

1,353 

1,143 

510 

(407) 

3,512 

29,954 

123,543 

(417) 

697,472 

227,567 

20,354 

945,393 

486,258 

110,621 

16,810 

613,689 

- 

83,397 

12,728 

(10) 

13,327 

5,784 

(195) 

240 

705 

(205) 

96,964 

19,217 

582,383 

129,722 

17,560 

729,665 

91,836 

115,089 

82,331 

97,845 

945 

2,794 

175,112 

215,728 

Oil and gas fields in Ukraine and Russia include $7.8m and $0.6m respectively relating to items under construction (2018: $1.0m and 
nil).  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
105 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

2018 

Group 

Cost 

At 1 January 

Additions during the year 

Foreign exchange  

Disposal of property, plant and equipment 

Reclassified to assets held for sale 

Reclassified from inventories 

Oil and gas assets 

Oil and gas 
fields  
Ukraine 
$000 

Gas field  
Russia  
$000 

Oil and gas 
fields  
Hungary  
$000 

Other assets 
$000 

Total 
$000 

567,195 

230,149 

37,442 

18,257 

853,043 

10,899 

- 

- 

- 

- 

602 

(39,325) 

(112) 

- 

- 

- 

- 

(37,442) 

1,638 

- 

- 

252 

(292) 

(462) 

- 

- 

11,753 

(39,617) 

(574) 

(37,442) 

1,638 

17,755 

788,801 

At 31 December 

578,094 

192,952 

Accumulated depreciation, depletion and 
amortisation and provision for impairment 

At 1 January 

477,171 

127,188 

37,442 

17,211 

659,012 

Depreciation on disposals of property, plant and 
equipment 

Foreign exchange  

Depreciation charge for the year 

Reclassified to assets held for sale 

At 31 December 

Carrying amount 

At 1 January 

At 31 December 

- 

- 

9,087 

- 

(112) 

(22,212) 

5,757 

- 

- 

- 

- 

(37,442) 

486,258 

110,621 

90,024 

91,836 

102,961 

82,331 

- 

- 

- 

(459) 

(253) 

311 

- 

(571) 

(22,465) 

15,155 

(37,442) 

16,810 

613,689 

1,046 

945 

194,031 

175,112 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
106 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Notes to consolidated financial statements 

5.(b) Intangible assets: exploration and evaluation expenditure 

2019 

Group 

At 1 January  

At 31 December  

2018 

Group 

Cost: 

At 1 January  

Reclassified to assets held for sale 

Disposal of assets written off 

At 31 December  

Provision against oil and gas assets 

At 1 January  

Reclassified to assets held for sale 

Disposal of assets written off 

At 31 December 

Carrying amount 

At 1 January  

At 31 December  

Ukraine 

$000 

Hungary 

Rest of World 

$000 

$000 

Total 

$000 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

Ukraine 
$000 

Hungary 
$000 

Rest of World 
$000 

Total 
$000 

1,308 

- 

(1,308) 

- 

1,308 

- 

(1,308) 

- 

- 

- 

814 

(814) 

- 

- 

814 

(814) 

- 

- 

- 

- 

14,236 

- 

16,358 

(814) 

(14,236) 

(15,544) 

- 

- 

14,236 

- 

16,358 

(814) 

(14,236) 

(15,544) 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

5.(c) Impairment test for property, plant and equipment  

A review was undertaken at the reporting date of the carrying amounts of property, plant and equipment to determine whether there 
was any indication of a trigger that may have led to these assets suffering an impairment loss. Following this review impairment 
triggers were noted in relation to the Ukrainian assets due to the significantly lower gas sales prices in 2019, in relation to the Russian 
assets due to the lower than expected production rate achieved by Well 5 and the negative revision to its reserves in the latest CPR, and 
in relation to both Ukrainian and Russian assets due to the carrying amount of the Group net assets exceeding the Company’s market 
capitalisation.  

As there is no readily available market for the Group’s oil and gas properties, fair value is derived as the net present value of the 
estimated future cash flows arising from the continued use of the assets, incorporating assumptions that a typical market participant 
would take into account. 

The value in use of an oil and gas property is generally lower than its Fair Value Less Costs of Disposal (‘FVLCD’) as value in use reflects 
only those cash flows expected to be derived from the asset in its current condition. FVLCD includes appraisal and development 
expenditure that a market participant would consider likely to enhance the productive capacity of an asset and optimise future cash 
flows. Consequently, the Group determines recoverable amount based on FVLCD using a Discounted Cash Flow (‘DCF’) methodology.  

The DCF was derived by estimating discounted after tax cash flows for each CGU based on estimates that a typical market participant 
would use in valuing such assets.  

The impairment tests compared the recoverable amount of the respective CGUs noted below to the respective carrying values of their 
associated assets. The estimates of FVLCD meet the definition of level three fair value measurements as they are determined from 
unobservable inputs. The impairment tests were performed based on conditions as at year end. 

Impairment test for the Ukrainian oil and gas assets 

Poltava Petroleum Company (‘PPC’), a wholly owned subsidiary of JKX, holds 100% interest in five production licences (Ignativske, 
Movchanivske, Rudenkivske, Novomykolaivske, Elyzavetivske) and one exploration licence (Zaplavska) in the Poltava region of 
Ukraine.  

The Ignativske, Movchanivske, Rudenkivske, Novomykolaivske production licences contain one or more distinct fields which, together 
with the Zaplavska exploration licence, form the Novomykolaivske Complex (‘NNC’).  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
107 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

The Elyzavetivske production licence is located 45km from the Novomykolaivske Complex and has its own gas production facilities.  

Ukrainian Cash Generating Units (‘CGUs’) 
In respect of the Group’s Ukraine assets the NNC forms a single CGU as these contain oil and gas fields which are serviced by a single 
processing facility and do not have separately identifiable cash inflows. In addition they have commonality of facilities, personnel and 
services.  

The Elyzavetivske licence also has its own separate processing facilities and separately identifiable cash flows and therefore is a 
distinct CGU for the purpose of the impairment test. During 2015 an extension to the Elyzavetivske production licence was awarded to 
PPC which included the West Mashivska field. Due to the proximity of the West Mashivska field to the Elyzavetivske plant, production 
will be tied back to the Elyzavetivske  processing facilities and therefore forms part of this CGU. 

In accordance with IAS 36, the impairment review was undertaken in Ukrainian hryvnia being the currency in which future cash flows 
from NNC and Elyzavetivske will be generated. 

Key Assumptions – NNC and Elyzavetivske   
The key assumptions used in the impairment testing were: 

  Production profiles: these were based on the latest available information assessed internally including assessment of the results of 
external reserve engineer audits in the year. Such information included 2P reserves for NNC and Elyzavetivske of 21.5 MMboe and 
1.8 MMboe, respectively.  

  Economic life of field: it was assumed that the title to the licences is retained and that the NNC licence term will be successfully 
extended beyond its current 2024 expiration date through to the economic life of the field (expected to be around 2037). The 
economic life of the Elyzavetivske field is currently expected to be around 2035 as per management’s current expectation.  

  Gas prices: during 2015 Ukraine acquired the ability to purchase gas from Europe rather than being completely dependent on Russia 
for imports. As such, Ukrainian gas prices are expected to be more aligned with European gas prices in future but also influenced by 
international oil prices. The gas price used for 2020 is based on estimates of gas prices to be realised by our Ukrainian subsidiary 
determined considering external market forecasts as at year end with consideration given the applicability or otherwise of relevant 
pricing adjustments for the local market. For the following ten years a forward gas price curve was used with gas prices increasing in 
line with inflation thereafter.  

  Oil prices: the Company used a forward price curve as at year end for the next eight years and remaining constant thereafter.  

  Production taxes: the Company has assumed production tax rates of 29% for gas and oil. A gas tax rate of 12% is applied to wells 

drilled since 1 January 2018.  

  Capital and operating costs: these were based on current operating and capital costs in Ukraine for both projects. Estimates were 

provided by third parties and supported by estimates from our own specialists, where necessary.  

  Post tax nominal discount rate of 14.2%. This was based on a Capital Asset Pricing Model analysis consistent with that used in 

previous impairment reviews. 

Based on the key assumptions set out above: 

  the recoverable amount of NNC’s oil and gas assets ($111.4m) exceeds its carrying amount ($107.8m) by $3.6m and therefore NNC’s 

oil and gas assets were not impaired. 

  Elyzavetivske’s recoverable amount (including the West Mashivska extension) ($19.9m) exceeds its carrying amount ($15.8m) by 

$4.1m, and therefore the CGU’s oil and gas assets were not impaired. 

Sensitivity analysis for the NNC and Elyzavetivske 

Any impairment is dependent on judgement used in determining the most appropriate basis for the assumptions and estimates made by 
management, particularly in relation to the key assumptions described above. Sensitivity analysis to potential changes in key 
assumptions has therefore been provided below. 

The impact on the impairment calculation of applying different assumptions to gas prices, production volumes, future capital 
expenditure and post-tax discount rates, all other inputs remaining equal, would be as follows: 

Impact if gas and oil prices: 

increased by 20%  

Impact if gas and oil production 
volumes: 

reduced by 20%  

increased by 10% 

decreased by 10% 

Impact if future capital expenditure: 

increased by 20% 

NNC  
Increase/(decrease) in 
headroom of $3.6 for 
NNC CGU 
$m 

Elyzavetivske 
 Increase/(decrease) in 
headroom of $4.1m for 
Elyzavetivske CGU $m 

40.0 

(40.0) 

36.8 

(17.1) 

(7.2) 

7.9 

(7.9) 

6.5 

(0.4) 

(2.2) 

 
 
 
 
 
  
  
108 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Notes to consolidated financial statements 

Impact if post-tax discount rate: 

increased by 2 percentage points to 16.2% 

decreased by 2 percentage points to 12.2% 

decreased by 20% 

26.9 

(10.4) 

14.5 

4.7 

(0.5) 

0.5 

Impairment test for Yuzhgazenergie LLC (‘YGE’), Russia  

Following the 2007 acquisition of YGE in Russia, a technical and environmental re-evaluation of YGE’s Koshekhablskoye gas field 
redevelopment was undertaken by the Group. The re-evaluation resulted in a revised development plan and production profile. The 
development plan and production profile have continued to be refined since that time.  

In accordance with IAS 36, the impairment review has been undertaken in Russian Roubles, which is the functional currency of YGE. 

Key Assumptions – YGE  
The key assumptions used in the impairment testing were: 

  Production profiles: these were based on the latest available information assessed internally including assessment of the results of 

external reserve engineer audits in the year. Such information included 2P reserves for YGE of 56.6 MMboe. 

  Economic life of field: it was assumed that YGE will be successful in extending the licence term beyond its current 2026 expiration to 
the economic life of the field (expected to be around 2049). The discounted cash flow methodology used has not taken account of any 
opportunities that may exist to extract reserves in a shorter timeframe by investing to increase the current plant capacity.  

  Gas prices: from 1 July 2020 and annually thereafter, the gas prices have been increased by 3.8% and then by 2% through to 2025 

based on historical experience.  

  Capital and operating costs: these were based on current operating and capital costs in Russia, project estimates provided by third 

parties and supported by estimates from our own specialists, where necessary. 

  Post tax nominal Rouble discount rate of 10.5%. This was based on a Capital Asset Pricing Model analysis consistent with that used in 

previous impairment reviews. 

Based on the key assumptions set out above YGE’s recoverable amount ($112.8m) exceeds it carrying amount ($97.8m) by $15.0m and 
therefore YGE’s Koshekhablskoye gas field was not impaired.  

Any impairment is dependent on judgement used in determining the most appropriate basis for the assumptions and estimates made by 
management, particularly in relation to the key assumptions described above. Sensitivity analysis to  potential changes in key 
assumptions has therefore been reviewed below. 

The impact on the impairment calculation of applying different assumptions to gas prices, production, future capital expenditure and 
post-tax discount rates, all other inputs remaining equal, would be as follows: 

Sensitivity Analysis 

Increase/(decrease) in headroom of $15.0m for 
Yuzhgazenergie CGU  
$m 

Impact of Adygean gas price: 

growth rates increased by 10% annually  

growth rates reduced by 10% annually  

Impact of production volumes: 

Increased by 10% 

Decreased by 10% 

Impact of future capital expenditure: 

Increased by 20% 

Decreased by 20% 

Impact of post-tax discount rate: 

Increased by 1 percentage point to 11.5% 

Decreased by 1 percentage point to 9.5% 

4.2 

(4.2) 

36.3 

(7.4) 

(9.7) 

20.2 

(8.0) 

10.4 

6. Investments 

Group unquoted equity investments comprise a 10% holding of the ordinary share capital of PJSC of “Mining Company 
Ukrnaftoburinnya” (“UNB”), a Ukrainian oil and gas company, and a 1.43% holding of the ordinary share capital of Linx 
Telecommunications Holding B.V. (“Linx”), a Netherlands telecommunications company. These investments were previously measured 
at cost as allowed by IAS 39 (paragraph 46 (c)) and were fully impaired at 31 December 2017 and had been for several years. 

As of 1 January 2018 Group’s investments in equity instruments were reclassified to financial assets at fair value through other 
comprehensive income in accordance with the provisions of IFRS 9. The Group has made an irrevocable election at the time of initial 
recognition to account for the equity investment at fair value through other comprehensive income (FVOCI). 

 
  
  
 
 
 
 
  
  
  
 
109 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

At 31 December 2019 the carrying value of UNB remained fully impaired following assessment by the Board considering relevant 
available information and valuation techniques, reflecting: 

  the lack of liquidity in the shares of UNB and considerations regarding the nature of markets for such an investment; 

  the absence of any history of dividends or other returns on the investment since acquisition in 2006 and the significant uncertainty 

regarding future returns; 

  the absence of regular formal communication with UNB or potential buyers;  

  the level of uncertainty regarding any market valuation method based on quoted Ukrainian oil and gas companies given key 

differences in the respective businesses and corporate structures; 

  the limited number of quoted Ukrainian oil and gas companies that can be used for the market valuation approach, defined 

in IFRS 13; and 

  a paper prepared by a specialist third party advisor to the Board of Directors noted the limited number of likely parties potentially 
interested in purchasing the investment and the difficulties in determining the consideration for which the investment might be 
disposed generally. 

At 31 December 2019 the carrying value of Linx was reported as $0.5m (2018: nil), with this valuation being based upon management’s 
expectation of future and final dividends to be received from Linx in 2020.  Management attends Linx shareholder meetings and is in 
regular communication with its management. Management understands that Linx continues to dispose of its businesses units and 
dividend out all proceeds to shareholders prior to a liquidation of the company.  Previously dividends were received during 2017 and 
2019 of $0.1m and $0.03m respectively after disposals of other business units. The carrying value of $0.5m is consistent with Linx 
management expectations of consideration to be received for disposal of the remaining business units and also with the most recent 
financial statements of Linx. 

7. Inventories 

Warehouse inventory and materials 

Oil and gas inventory 

2019 

$000 

 4,056  

 2,859  

 6,915  

2018 
$000 

  2,273 

  2,079 

4,352 

During the year there were no obsolete inventories written off to profit and loss (2018: there were no obsolete inventories written off 
to profit and loss). 

8. Trade and other receivables 

Trade receivables 

Less: ECLs 

Trade receivables – net 

Other receivables 

VAT receivable 

Prepayments 

2019 

$000 

 2,221  

 (423) 

 1,798  

 160 

 639  

 1,334 

 3,931 

2018 
$000 

2,085 

(559) 

1,526 

279 

384  

2,922 

5,111 

As of 31 December 2019, trade and other receivables of $0.4m (2018: $0.6m) were past due and full expected credit loss (“ECL”) 
provision was recognised with the asset considered credit impaired. The amount of the provision was $0.4m (2018: $0.6m). This 
receivable relates to a single gas customer, which is more than three years past due. Legal proceedings were initiated in Q4 of 2016 and 
finished in Q3 of 2018 in favour of the Company. During the year ended 31 December 2019 the Company collected $0.1m and is seeking 
collection of the amount outstanding, but significant uncertainty remains over the collection. 

As of 31 December 2019, trade and other receivables of $3.9m (2018: $1.8m) were current and not impaired. There is no difference 
between the carrying value of trade and other receivables and their fair value. 

Prepayments comprise of prepayments made to suppliers. Decrease in prepayments of $1.6m from $2.9m to $1.3m is mainly due to the 
completion of 3D seismic work on Elyzavetivske field in Ukraine in April 2019, which amounted to $1.3m and was included in $2.9m 
balance at 31 December 2018. 

 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
110 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Notes to consolidated financial statements 

The carrying amounts of the Group’s trade and other receivables are denominated in the following currencies: 

US Dollar 

Sterling  

Euros 

Hungarian Forints 

Ukrainian Hryvnia 

Russian Roubles 

9. Cash and cash equivalents  

Cash 

Short term deposits 

Short term deposits held comprised amounts held on deposit, but were readily convertible to cash.  

10. Trade and other payables 

Current 

Trade payables 

Other payables 

Contract liabilities 

Other taxes and social security costs 

VAT payable 

Accruals  

Current 

Lease liabilities 

Non-Current 

Lease liabilities 

11. Borrowings 

Current 

Convertible bonds due 2020  

Term-loans repayable within one year 

Non-Current 

Convertible bonds due 2020  

Term-loans repayable after more than one year 

2019 

$000 

11 

- 

1 

- 

148 

1,798 

1,958 

2019 

$000 

 12,495 

 8,134  

 20,629 

2018 
$000 

42 

- 

1 

- 

15 

1,747 

1,805 

2018 
$000 

16,939 

2,243 

 19,182 

2019 

$000 

2018 
$000 

3,894 

298 

 2,111 

 2,435 

 1,993 

 3,427 

 873 

3 

3,273 

   2,196 

1,327 

3,110 

14,158 

10,782 

1,461 

628 

2019 

$000 

5,683 

5,683 

- 

- 

- 

- 

2018 
$000 

5,962 

5,962 

5,041 

5,041 

Convertible bonds due 2020 
On 19 February 2013 the Company successfully completed the placing of $40m of guaranteed unsubordinated convertible bonds with 
institutional investors which were due 2018 (prior to restructuring) raising cash of $37.2m net of issue costs.  

 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
111 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Prior to restructuring the Bonds had an annual coupon of 8 per cent per annum payable semi-annually in arrears.  

The Bonds were convertible into ordinary shares of the Company at any time from 1 April 2013 up until seven days prior to their 
maturity on 19 February 2020 at a conversion price of 76.29 pence per Ordinary Share, unless the Company settles the conversion 
notice by paying the Bondholder the Cash Alternative Amount (see below).   

The Company made the final payment to Bondholders on 19 February 2020 in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Bond 
(see Note 33). 

Convertible bonds restructured on 3 January 2017 
On 3 January 2017 a special resolution was approved by Bondholders to change the terms and conditions of the Bonds. The main 
amendments to the terms and conditions of the Bonds were as follows:  

  the Bondholder's option to require redemption of all of the outstanding Bonds on 19 February 2017 was deleted;  

  the final maturity date of the Bonds was extended to 19 February 2020, with the outstanding principal amount of the Bonds being 

repaid in three instalments; 33% on 19 February 2018; 33 % on 19 February 2019; and 34% on the 19 February 2020; 

  the coupon rate of the Bonds was increased from 8% to 14%; 

  the covenant which limited new borrowings by the Company was removed; and 

  the Company were to make two payments to Bondholders in respect of prior accretion amounts, on 19 February 2017 and on 19 

February 2018 of 12.0% and 3.0%, respectively, of the principal amount of the Bonds. 

On 19 February 2018 the Company made a payment of the first instalment to Bondholders of $5.3m (33% of the principal amount of the 
Bonds), together with the final accretion payment of $0.5m (3.0% of the principal amount of the Bonds) and interest of $1.1m. On 19 
February 2019 the Company made a payment of the second instalment to Bondholders of $5.3m (33% of the principal amount of the 
Bonds), together with $0.7m interest payment in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Bond. On 19 August 2019 the 
Company made interest payment of $0.4m in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Bond. On 19 February 2020 the Company 
made the final payment of the third instalment to Bondholders of $5.4m (34% of the principal amount of the Bonds), together with 
$0.4m interest payment in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Bond. 

Cash Alternative Amount 
At the option of the Company, the conversion notice in respect of the Bonds could be settled in cash rather than shares, the Cash 
Alternative Amount payable was based on the Volume Weighted Average Price of the Company’s shares prior to the conversion notice. 

Credit facility 
On 11 December 2018, PPC, our subsidiary in Ukraine, renewed a 12 month revolving credit line from Tascombank for UAH280m 
(originally secured 15 December 2017 for UAH150 m). At 31 December 2019 the total short-term line of credit amounted to $11.8m at an 
exchange rate of $1: 23.69 (2018: $10.1m at an exchange rate of $1: 27.69 Hryvnia). The amount outstanding at 31 December 2019 was 
nil (2018: nil), so the undrawn portion totaled $11.8m (2018: $10.1m). The facility will be available through December 2021 (subject to 
planned renewal if required) and draw downs are subject to certain bank credit approvals. In addition PPC holds a UAH50m ($1.8m) 
overdraft facility which remains undrawn and was renewed until 13 December 2021. 

The main terms and conditions of the revolving credit line are as follows:  

  drawdowns can be made either in USD or UAH and are individually subject to credit approval by the lender;  

  interest rate cost for USD drawn down is 9%; 

  interest rate cost for UAH drawn down: 17.0% to 30 days, 17.50% 31 to 90 days, 20.00% 91 to 180 days, 21.00% 181 to 365 days; 

  borrowing above UAH90m, equivalent to $3.8m at 31 December 2019 (2018: $3.3m) will require a corporate guarantee from JKX Oil & 
Gas Plc. The corporate guarantee provided by the JKX Oil & Gas plc in respect of the credit facility with Tascombank is considered to 
be an insurance contract under the provisions of IFRS 4; 

  assets with a market value of UAH460m, equivalent to $19.4m at 31 December 2019 (2018: UAH460m, equivalent to $16.6m at 31 

December 2018) have been identified for use as a collateral, collateral is to be provided only on a drawdown; 

  amount borrowed will be repaid during the last 4 months, by equal-sized monthly payments, to be effected on the last day of the 
month/the last day of the credit limit period. Last date of repayment for the last part of amount borrowed is 13 December 2021. 

The credit facility of $11.8m (2018:  $10.1m) includes two financial covenants. If the covenants are not met an additional interest of 2% 
applies to the facility but failure to meet covenants does not represent an event of default: 

  to keep gross margin at no less than 50% during the period of the credit facility agreement, based on PPC’s financial reporting 

results.  

  starting from the first quarter of 2019 and during the period of the credit  facility agreement, PPC is to maintain the ratio between 

financial (interest) debt and EBITDA (adjusted to the annual value) at no more than 3.0. 

 
 
 
112 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Notes to consolidated financial statements 

12. Derivatives 

Non-current derivative financial instruments 

At the beginning of the year 

Derivative liability written-off 

Fair value loss movement during the year 

At the end of the year 

2019 

$000 

62 

(62) 

- 

- 

2018 
$000 

3 

- 

59 

62 

Convertible bonds due 2020 – embedded derivatives 
Company Call Option 
The Company could redeem the Bonds at any time in full but not in part at their principal amount plus one semi-annual coupon plus any 
accrued interest. If the Bonds were called prior to 19 February 2020, the redemption price would also include an additional U.S. $6,000 
per Bond. 

The Company could redeem the Bonds any time in full but not in part at their principal amount plus any accrued interest if the 
aggregate principal amount of the Bonds outstanding is less than 15% of the aggregate principal amount originally issued. 

Fixed exchange rate 
The Sterling-US Dollar exchange rate is fixed at £1/$1.5809 for the conversion and other features. 

The Company made the final payment to Bondholders on 19 February 2020 in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Bond 
(see Note 33). 

13. Financial instruments 

Fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities - Group 
Set out below is a comparison by category of carrying amounts and fair values of the Group’s financial instruments. Fair value is the 
amount at which a financial instrument could be exchanged in an arm’s length transaction. Where available, market values have been 
used (this excludes short term assets and liabilities).  

Financial assets 

Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash (Note 9) – classified at 
amortised cost 

Trade receivables (Note 8) – classified at amortised cost 

Other receivables (Note 8) – classified at amortised cost 

Financial liabilities 

Trade payables (Note 10) - carried at amortised cost  

Other payables (Note 10) - carried at amortised cost 

Accruals (Note 10) - carried at amortised cost 

Borrowings – convertible bonds due 2020  
(Note 11) - carried at amortised cost (current) 
Borrowings – convertible bonds due 2020   
(Note 11) - carried at amortised cost (non-current) 

Lease liabilities 

Derivatives – fair value through profit or loss (Note 12) 

Book Value 
2019 
$000 

Fair Value 
2019 
$000 

Book Value 
2018 
$000 

Fair Value 
2018 
$000 

20,629 

20,629 

19,182 

19,182 

 1,798  

 160 

 1,798  

 160 

3,894 

298 

3,080 

5,683 

3,894 

298 

3,080 

5,683 

1,526 

279  

 873  

 3  

2,468 

5,962 

1,526 

279  

 873  

 3  

2,468 

5,962 

- 

- 

5,041 

5,041 

2,089 

2,089 

- 

- 

- 

62 

- 

62 

Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost are carried at $15.0m (2018: $14.3m). The Group’s borrowings at 31 December 2019 
relate entirely to the convertible bonds due 2020. 

Fair value hierarchy 
Derivatives 
At 31 December 2018 the Group’s derivative financial instrument related to embedded derivative within the convertible bonds due 
2020 (Note 12). The value of the derivative was calculated at inception using the Monte Carlo simulation methodology and 
subsequently using the Black-Scholes formula, and the Company’s historic share price and volatility, treasury rates and other 

 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
113 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

estimations. As it was derived from inputs that are not from observable market data it was grouped into level 3 within the fair value 
measurement hierarchy. 

The main assumptions used in valuation of the derivative conversion option as at 31 December 2018 were: 

  underlying share price of 2018: £0.11; 

  £/US$ spot rate of £1/$1.2754; 

  historic volatility of 54.03%; 

  risk free rate based on the maturity which is 1.14 year US Treasury rate of 2.578% and 0.14 year US Treasury rate of 2.444% 

(continuously compounded). 

A 10% increase/decrease in Company’s historic share price volatility would have resulted in an increase in the fair value loss for the 
year of $0.1m and decrease in the fair value loss of $0.02m, respectively, assuming that all other variables remain constant. 

Following the final payment of the Bond made to Bondholders on 19 February 2020 (see Note 33) the derivative of $0.1m was written 
off to the Income statement at 31 December 2019 as its fair value was negligible at year end. 

Credit risk - Group 
The Group has policies in place to ensure that sales of products are made to customers with appropriate credit worthiness. The Group 
limits credit risk by assessing creditworthiness of potential counterparties before entering into transactions with them and continuing 
to evaluate their creditworthiness after transactions have been initiated. Where appropriate, the use of prepayment for product sales 
limits the exposure to credit risk. There is no difference between the carrying amount of trade and other receivables and the maximum 
credit risk exposure.  

The maximum financial exposure due to credit risk on the Group’s financial assets, representing the sum of cash and cash equivalents, 
trade receivables and other current assets, as at 31 December 2019 was $22.6m (2018: $21.0m). 

Capital management – Group 
The Directors determine the appropriate capital structure of the Group specifically, how much is raised from shareholders (equity) and 
how much is borrowed from financial institutions (debt) in order to finance the Group’s business strategy.  

The Group’s policy as to the level of equity capital and reserves is to ensure that it maintains a strong financial position and low gearing 
ratio which provides financial flexibility to continue as a going concern and to maximise shareholder value. The capital structure of the 
Group consists of shareholders’ equity together with net debt. The Group’s funding requirements are met through a combination of 
debt, equity and operational cash flow. 

Net cash 
Net cash comprises: borrowings disclosed in Note 11 and total cash in Note 9 and excludes derivatives. Equity attributable to the 
shareholders of the Company comprises issued capital, other reserves and retained earnings (see Consolidated statement of changes in 
equity).  

The capital structure of the Group is as follows: 

Convertible bonds due 2020 (current and non-current, Note 11) 

Total cash (Note 9) 

Net cash 

Total shareholders’ equity 

2019 

$000 

2018 
$000 

(5,683) 

(11,003) 

20,629 

14,946 

19,182 

8,179 

186,255 

141,682 

Liquidity risk - Group 
The treasury function is responsible for liquidity, funding and settlement management under policies approved by the Board of 
Directors. Liquidity needs are monitored using regular forecasting of operational cash flows and financing commitments. The Group 
maintains a mixture of cash and cash equivalents and committed facilities in order to ensure sufficient funding for business 
requirements. 

The following tables set out details of the expected contractual maturity of non-derivative financial liabilities. The tables include both 
interest and principal cash flows on an undiscounted basis. To the extent that interest flows are floating rate, the undiscounted amount 
is derived from interest rate curves at the reporting date. 

 
 
 
 
 
114 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Notes to consolidated financial statements 

The maturity analysis for financial liabilities was as follows:  

Group - 31 December 2019 

Maturity of financial liabilities 

Trade payables (Note 10) 

Other payables (Note 10) 

Accruals (Note 10) 

Borrowings – Convertible bonds due 2020 

Lease liabilities 

Group - 31 December 2018 

Maturity of financial liabilities 

Trade payables (Note 10) 

Other payables (Note 10) 

Accruals (Note 10) 

Borrowings – Convertible bonds due 2020 

Within 3 
months 
$000 

3 months 
 - 1year 
  $000 

1 – 2 
years 
  $000 

 2 – 5 
years 
  $000 

3,894 

298 

3,080 

5,683 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

484 

1,294 

392 

342 

Within 3 
months 
$000 

3 months 
 - 1year 
  $000 

 1-2 years 
  $000 

 873 

  3 

2,468 

6,030 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

381 

5,821 

Interest rate risk profile of financial assets and liabilities - Group 
Fixed rate interest is charged on the Group’s convertible bond (see Note 11). The interest rate profile of the other financial assets and 
liabilities of the Group as at 31 December is as follows (excluding short-term assets and liabilities, non-interest bearing): 

Group – 31 December 

Floating rate 

Short term deposits (Note 9) 

Other receivables (Note 8) 

Other payables (Note 10) 

2019 
Within 1 Year 
$000 

2018 
Within 1 Year 
$000 

8,134 

160 

298 

2,243 

279 

3 

Floating rate financial assets comprise cash deposits placed on money markets at call, seven day and monthly rates. 

Interest rate sensitivity - Group 
The sensitivity analysis below has been determined based on the exposure to interest rates on our short term deposits at the reporting 
date.  

If interest rates had been 1 per cent higher/lower and all other variables were held constant, the Group’s profit (2018: profit) after tax 
and net assets for the year ended 31 December 2019 would increase/decrease by $12,000 (2018: $16,000). 1 per cent is the sensitivity 
rate used as it best represents management’s assessment of the possible change in interest rates that could apply to the Group. 

Foreign currency exposures - Group 
The table below shows the extent to which the Group has monetary assets and liabilities in currencies other than the functional 
currency of the operating company involved. These exposures give rise to the net currency gains and losses recognised in the income 
statement.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
115 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

As at 31 December the asset/(liability) foreign currency exposures were: 

Sterling  

Euros 

Ukrainian Hryvnia 

Bulgarian Leva 

Russian Roubles 

Canadian Dollar 

Total net 

2019 
$000 

675 

1,086 

5,470 

41 

(368) 

- 

2018 
$000 

(1,223) 

 371 

 4,583 

 33 

3,732 

 6  

6,904 

 7,502 

1 

Foreign currency exposures do not include Hungarian Forints, as Hungary is included under “assets held for sale” in the Statement of financial position. 

Foreign currency sensitivity - Group 
The Group is mainly exposed to the currency fluctuations of Ukraine (Hryvnia), Russia (Rouble) and UK (Sterling). The sensitivity 
analysis principally arises on money market deposits and working capital items held at the reporting date. 

The following table details the Group’s sensitivity to a 10 per cent (2018: 10 per cent) increase and decrease in the US Dollar against 
Sterling and against Hryvnia and Rouble, all other variables were held constant. Due to the historically significant foreign currency 
fluctuation in the UK, Ukraine and Russia 10 per cent has been used to calculate sensitivity for Sterling, Hryvnia and Rouble. 10 per 
cent (2018: 10 per cent) is the sensitivity rate that best represents management’s assessment of the possible change in the foreign 
exchange rates affecting the Group. A positive number below indicates an increase in profit and equity when the US Dollar weakens 
against the relevant currency. For a strengthening of the US Dollar against the relevant currency, there would be an equal and opposite 
impact on the profit and other equity, and the balances below would be negative.  

Hryvnia 
2019 
$000 

Hryvnia  
2018 
$000 

Rouble 
2019 
$000 

Rouble 
2018 
$000 

Sterling 
2019 
$000 

Sterling 
2018 
$000 

Profit/(loss) for the year and Equity 

10 per cent strengthening of the US Dollar/ (2018: 10 per 
cent) 

547 

458 

 (37) 

373 

10 per cent weakening of the US Dollar/(2018: 10 per cent) 

(547) 

(458) 

37 

(373) 

67 

(67) 

(122) 

122 

Commodity risk and sensitivity - Group  
The Group’s earnings are exposed to the effect of fluctuations in oil, gas and condensate prices and the risks relating to their 
fluctuation in are discussed on page 38, together with the discussion of financial risk factors. The Group’s oil, gas and condensate is sold 
to local trading companies through market related contracts.  

The Group is a price taker and does not enter into commodity hedge agreements unless required for borrowing purposes which may 
occur from time to time. Therefore no sensitivity analysis has been prepared on the exposure to oil, gas or condensate prices for 
outstanding monetary items at the 31 December 2019 as there is no impact on any outstanding amounts. 

14. Discontinued operations and assets classified as held for sale  

In early February 2018 the Group announced its intention to exit its oil and gas operations in Hungary and initiated an active 
programme to dispose of its Hungarian business. The sale-purchase agreement for the disposal of the Hungarian business was executed 
in March 2020.  

The associated assets and liabilities were presented as held for sale in the financial statements at 31 December 2018 and remains as 
such at 31 December 2019. Prior to the reclassification assets were measured at the lower of carrying amount and fair value less costs 
to sell. 

At the time the sale was agreed the consideration expected to be received was comprising of approximately $2.0m of consideration and 
a working capital adjustment anticipated to be $0.9m, with the actual consideration sum due to be determined and settled in full on 
completion which is expected before the end of April 2020. A reversal of impairment of $2.2m was recognised at 31 December 2019. 
The amount of this reversal is exceeded by previous historical impairment charges, allowing for depreciation, made against the 
Hungarian assets. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
116 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Notes to consolidated financial statements 

The financial performance and cash flow information presented are for periods ended 31 December 2019 and 31 December 2018. 

Revenue 

Exceptional item - reversal of provision for impairment of Hungary 

Royalties 

Other cost of sales 

Total cost of sales 

Administrative expenses 

Gain/(loss)  on foreign exchange 

Profit from operations and before tax 

Taxation – current 

Taxation – deferred 

Total taxation 

Profit for the year 

Net cash outflow from operating activities 

Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents 

Net cash used by the subsidiary 

31 December  
2019 
$000 

31 December 
2018 
$000 

133 

2,232 

(25) 

(369) 

1,971 

(11) 

44 

2,004 

- 

- 

- 

2,004 

(176) 

- 

(176) 

 1,645 

- 

 (75) 

 (356) 

 (431) 

 20 

 (304) 

 930 

(7) 

2,564 

2,557 

3,487 

(158) 

17 

(141) 

The following assets and liabilities were classified as held for sale in relation to the discontinued operation as at 31 December 2019 and 
2018.  

Assets and liabilities of disposal group classified as held for sale 

Assets classified as held for sale 

Property, plant and equipment 

Trade and other receivables 

Cash  

Restricted cash 

Total assets of disposal group held for sale 

Liabilities of the disposal group classified as held for sale 

Trade and other payables 

Abandonment provision 

Total liabilities of disposal group held for sale 

Net assets 

15. JKX Employee Benefit Trust 

31 December 
2019 
$000 

31 December 
2018 
$000 

2,232 

859 

96 

- 

- 

753 

273 

211 

3,187 

1,237 

(87) 

(200) 

(287) 

2,900 

(322) 

(453) 

(775) 

462 

In 2013, JKX Employee Benefit Trust was established and acquired 5,000,000 of shares in JKX Oil & Gas plc at a cost of $4.0m for 
the purpose of making awards under the Group’s employee share schemes and these shares have been classified in the statement 
of financial position as treasury shares within retained earnings.  

During 2019 JKX Employee Benefit Trust sold 1,186,547 shares at an average price of £0.30 per share (2018: nil). 180,525 shares 
were used in 2019 (2018: nil)  to settle share options, out of which 48,660 were sold in order to cover National insurance cost, 
therefore at 31 December 2019 JKX Employee Benefit Trust held 3,632,928 shares in JKX Oil & Gas plc (2018: 5,000,000). During 
January 2020 JKX Employee Benefit Trust sold its remaining 3,632,928 shares at an average price of £0.28 per share. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
117 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

16. Share capital  

Equity share capital, denominated in Sterling, was as follows: 

2019 
Number 

2019 
£000 

2019 
$000 

2018 
Number 

2018 
£000 

2018 
$000 

Authorised 

Ordinary shares of 10p each 

300,000,000 

30,000 

- 

300,000,000 

30,000 

- 

Allotted, called up and fully paid 

Opening balance at 1 January 

172,125,916 

17,212 

26,666 

172,125,916 

17,212 

26,666 

Exercise of share options 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

Closing balance at 31 December 

172,125,916 

17,212 

26,666 

172,125,916 

17,212 

26,666 

Of which the following are shares held in treasury: 

Treasury shares held at  
1 January and 31 December 

402,771 

40 

77 

402,771 

40 

77 

The Company did not purchase any treasury shares during 2019 (2018: none) and no treasury shares were used in 2019 (2018: none) to 
settle share options. There are no shares reserved for issue under options or contracts. As at 31 December 2019 the market value of the 
treasury shares held was $0.1m (2018: $0.2m). 

17. Other reserves 

At 1 January 2018 

Exchange differences arising on translation of 
overseas operations 

Remeasurement of post-employment benefit 
obligations 

Merger 
reserve 
$000 

30,680 

- 

- 

Capital 
redemption 
reserve  
$000 

Foreign 
currency 
translation 
reserve  
$000 

Post-
employment 
benefit 
obligation 
reserve 
$000 

Equity 
investments 
with FVOCI 
reserve 

$000 

587 

(184,060) 

(333) 

- 

- 

(19,475) 

- 

- 

(22) 

At 31 December 2018 

30,680 

587 

(203,535) 

(355) 

At 1 January 2019 

30,680 

587 

(203,535) 

(355) 

Exchange differences arising on translation of 
overseas operations 

Remeasurement of post-employment benefit 
obligations 
Changes in the fair value of equity investments 
at fair value through other comprehensive 
income 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

21,481 

- 

- 

- 

(94) 

Total  
$000 

(153,126) 

(19,475) 

(22) 

(172,623) 

(172,623) 

21,481 

(94) 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

500 

500 

At 31 December 2019 

30,680 

587 

(182,054) 

(449) 

500 

(150,736) 

Merger reserve was created on 30 May 1995 when JKX Oil & Gas plc acquired the issued share capital of JP Kenny Exploration & 
Production Limited for the issue of ordinary shares and represents the difference between the fair value of consideration given for the 
shares and the nominal value of those instruments. 

Capital redemption reserve relates to the buyback of shares in 2002, there have been no additional share buy-backs since this time. 

Foreign currency translation reserve includes movements that relate to the retranslation of the subsidiaries whose functional 
currencies are not the US Dollar. 

Equity investments with FVOCI reserve includes movements that relate to changes in the fair value of unlisted investments in equity. 

 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
118 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Notes to consolidated financial statements 

During 2019, the Russian Rouble (‘RR’) strengthened by approximately 11% from RR69.47/$ to RR61.91/$ (2018: weakened by 
approximately 21%, from RR57.60/$ to RR69.47/$). Ukrainian Hryvnia (‘UAH’) strengthened by approximately 14% from UAH 27.69/$ 
to UAH 23.69/$ (2018: strengthened by approximately 1%, from UAH 28.07/$ to UAH 27.69/$). Currency translation differences of 
US$21.4m (2018: US$19.4m) included in the Consolidated statement of comprehensive income arose on the translation of property, 
plant and equipment denominated in RR and UAH and amounted to $12.2m and $9.2m respectively (see Note 5 (a)). 

Post-employment benefit obligation reserve relates to a remeasurement of liability for defined benefit pension plan in PPC, our 
subsidiary in Ukraine. Under the Ukrainian legislation, employees who work in hazardous conditions have the right for an early 
retirement. PPC has jobs with hazardous working conditions (hereinafter referred to as the “list II”) and participates in the government 
defined benefit plan. Upon early retirement the pensioners are entitled to a pension which is financed by their employers until they 
enrol into a regular pension scheme financed by a Pension Fund of Ukraine. The early pension benefit (in the form of a monthly 
annuity) is payable by employers only until the employee has reached the statutory retirement age (60 – for males and females). The 
right to pension emerges once a number of conditions pertaining to pension insurance service record and service record in hazardous 
jobs have been met and a certain age has been reached. Once employees from the list II have reached 55 years of age, PPC would 
compensate to Pension Fund of Ukraine pension obligation for the next 5 years on a monthly basis. The employer is responsible for 
100% for “list II” categories of early pensioners. Pensions are calculated using a formula based on the employee’s salary, pension 
insurance service record, and total length of past service at specific types of workplaces (“list II” category) and, thus, the pension plan is 
a defined benefit plan by its nature.  

18. Provisions 

Current provisions 

At 1 January 2019 

Included in right-of-use assets on transition 

Foreign currency translation 

Amount provided in the year  

At 31 December 2019 

Non-current provisions 

At 1 January 2019 

Amount provided in the year 

Amount released in the year 

Foreign currency translation 

At 31 December 2019 

Production based 
taxes1  
$000 

Onerous lease 
provision2 
$000 

12,431 

- 

2,107 

1,323 

15,861 

214 

(214) 

- 

- 

- 

Production based 
taxes1 
$000 

30,074 

4,670 

Total 
$000 

12,645 

(214) 

2,107 

1,323 

15,861 

Total 
$000 

30,074 

4,670 

(14,403) 

(14,403) 

5,064 

25,405 

5,064 

25,405 

1  The provision for production based taxes, is in respect of claims against PPC for additional rental fees for the periods August to December 2010 and January to December 2015. 
$8.4m was recognised as a credit in the 2019 Consolidated income statement (2018:$5.1m charge) which is the net of a $14.4m reversal of provisions for four tax cases that 
have been closed in favour of PPC relating to January to December 2015 claims and of $6.0m interest accrued for the remaining cases that have not been closed, of which  $1.3m 
charge relates to the August to December 2010 claim (2018:$1.0m) and $4.7m charge relate to January to December 2015 claims  (2018:$4.1m). Remaining claims are being 
contested in the Ukrainian courts (see Note 25). The amount is denominated in Ukrainian Hryvnia (‘UAH’) and is stated above at its US$-equivalent amount using the 2019 year 
end rate of UAH23.69/$ (2018: UAH27.69/$). The provision for rental fee claims at 31 December 2019 includes estimated interest and penalties. Judgement is applied 
regarding application of relevant legislation to determine estimates of the interest and penalties, together with aspects of the underlying claims which are considered 
overstated based on the legislation on which the claims are based, should this legislation be applied, notwithstanding that the Group disputes the claims in their entirety. The 
Board believes that the claims are without merit under Ukrainian law and the Company will continue to contest them vigorously. Whilst provisions are held by the Group, 
additional contingent liabilities exist in respect of the rental fee claims given the judgments required in forming the provisions and alternative potential outcomes. 

2 

2018 onerous lease provision concerned the Group’s liability for onerous lease contracts relating to its London office. Following a reduction in London office staff in 2016, three 
out of the four floors of the occupied building became surplus to requirements. The provision was determined as the present value of the unavoidable costs relating to rents and 
rates to the end of the lease terms, net of the expected sub-lease income, discounted at 6.5%. The remaining life of the leases at 31 December 2018 was 3 years. Subsequently, 
three out of three floors have been assigned to new tenants which resulted in the release of the provision.  

 
 
 
 
119 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Non-current provisions 
Provision on decommissioning  

Provision for site restoration   

At 1 January 2019 

Foreign exchange adjustment 

Revision in estimates 

Unwinding of discount (Note 21) 

At 31 December 2019 

Ukraine  
$000 

Russia 
$000 

Total 
$000 

3,581 

2,018 

5,599 

573 

(676) 

500 

251 

- 

117 

824 

(676) 

617 

3,978 

2,386 

6,364 

The provision in respect of Ukraine represents the present value of the well and site restoration costs that are expected to be incurred 
up to 2034 (2018: 2035). The Russia provision results from the decommissioning of 15 wells (2018:15) and removal of plant as required 
by the licence obligation and is due to start from 2050 (2018: 2050). The provisions are made using the Group’s internal estimates that 
management believe form a reasonable basis for the expected future costs of decommissioning.  

19. Cost of sales  

Operating costs 

Depreciation, depletion and amortisation 

Other production based taxes 

Exceptional item – production based taxes (credit)/charge (Note 18) 

2019 
$000 

22,752 

18,512 

23,518 

64,782 

(8,410) 

56,372 

2018 
$000 

 20,897 

 14,732 

 21,857 

57,486 

5,055 

62,541 

The cost of inventories (calculated by reference to production costs) expensed in cost of sales in 2019 was $3.0m (2018: $0.9m). 

20. Finance income 

Interest income on deposits 

21. Finance costs  

Borrowing costs  
Interest for lease liabilities  

Unwinding of discount on site restoration (Note 18) 

2019 
$000 

857 

857 

2019 
$000 

1,183 

254 

617 

2,054 

22. Profit from operations – analysis of costs by nature 

Profit from operations derives solely from continuing operations and is stated after charging/(crediting) the following: 

Depreciation – other assets (Note 5. (a)) 

Depreciation, depletion and amortisation – oil and gas assets (Note 5. (a)) 

Staff costs (none was capitalised during the year (2018: net of $0.5m), Note 23) 

Foreign exchange loss 

2019 
$000 

705 

18,512 

9,051 

615 

2018 
$000 

 908 

908  

2018 
$000 

 2,068 

- 

 442 

 2,510 

2018 
$000 

311 

14,732 

12,452 

711 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
120 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Notes to consolidated financial statements 

During the year the Group (including its overseas subsidiaries) obtained the following services from the Company’s auditors: 

2019 
$000 

2018 
$000 

2018 
$000 

BDO fees 

BDO fees 

PWC fees 

Audit of the parent company and consolidated financial statements 

294 

205 

Fees payable to company’s auditors for other services: 

- Audit of the Company’s subsidiaries  

- Audit related assurance services 

- Other non-audit services 

231 

80 

- 

605 

167 

- 

2 

374 

- 

- 

105 

2 

107 

No non-audit services were provided in 2019 (2018: included $2 thousand of tax advisory services provided by BDO Unicon Moscow. 
The tax advisory services fee relates to reporting periods prior to BDO LLP’s appointment as the Group auditor and was discontinued 
upon their appointment.) 

23. Staff costs 

Wages and salaries 

UK social security costs 

Other pension costs 

Share based payments (equity-settled) (Note 24) 

2019 
$000 

8,741 

130 

166 

14 

2018 
$000 

12,502 

257  

205 

13 

9,051 

12,977 

Staff costs for the year ended 31 December 2018 were shown gross and $0.5m was capitalised, representing time spent on exploration 
and development activities.  

During the year, the average monthly number of employees was: 

Management/operational 

Administration support 

2019 
Number 

2018 
Number 

492 

82 

574 

487 

88 

575 

There is one Director on service contract included within management/operational (2018: nil). Further details of the Directors and 
their remuneration are included on pages 59 to 62 which form part of these financial statements. 

24. Share-based payments 

According to the 2010 Performance Share Plan (PSP) that is currently in place, the Remuneration Committee has the ability to grant 
awards of nil-cost options annually to senior management of the Group, conditional on the Group’s performance over a period of at least 
three years. No consideration is required to be paid for the grant or exercise of an Option. Vesting of the options is dependent upon 
certain criteria, including comparison of the Group’s TSR against the FTSE Fledgling index and the All-Share Oil & Gas Producers index. 
Options lapse when certain criteria are not met and may be forfeited when employees cease to be employed by the Group. The plan rules 
are described in the Directors’ Remuneration Report. All share-based payments are equity settled. During the year 180,525 share 
options were exercised and none granted in accordance with the PSP (2018: nil). The weighted average share price at the date of 
exercise of these shares was 23 pence. 

At 31 December 2018, there were outstanding options under the PSP, exercisable during the years 2019 to 2026 to acquire 256,150 
shares of the Company at nil cost per share. The vesting period for 256,150 of the share options was 3 years, with an exercise period of 7 
years making a 10 year maximum term. During 2019 180,525 shares were exercised at nil cost per share and 75,625 shares lapsed. 
There were no outstanding options under the PSP at 31 December 2019. 

The following table illustrates the number and weighted average exercise prices (‘WAEP’) of, and movements in, share options during 
the year. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
121 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Outstanding  at 1 January 

Exercisable at 1 January 

Lapsed/forfeited during the year 

Exercise of share options 

Outstanding at 31 December  

Exercisable at 31 December   

25. Taxation 

Analysis of tax on loss  

Current tax 

UK - current tax 

Overseas - current year 

Current tax expense  

Deferred tax 

Overseas – prior year  

Overseas - current year 

Deferred tax benefit  

Income tax expense 

2019 
Number 

151,250 

104,900 

(75,625) 

(180,525) 

- 

- 

2019 
WAEP 

0.00p 

0.00p 

0.00p 

0.00p 

- 

- 

2018 
Number 

1,059,650 

- 

(803,500) 

- 

151,250 

104,900 

2019 
$000 

- 

6,561 

6,561 

- 

3,645 

3,645 

10,206 

2018 
WAEP 

0.00p 

- 

0.00p 

- 

0.00p 

0.00p 

2018 
$000 

-  

5,478 

5,478 

- 

(3,233) 

(3,233) 

2,245 

Factors that affect the total tax charge 
The total tax charge for the year of $10.2m (2018: $2.2m charge) is lower (2018: lower) than the average rate of UK corporation tax of 
19.00% (2018: 19.00%). The differences are explained below: 

Total tax reconciliation 

Profit before tax 

Tax calculated at 19.00% (2018: 19.00%) 

Movement in recognised tax losses  

Effect of tax rates in foreign jurisdictions 

Rental fee provision  

Other non-deductible expenses  

Other  

Total tax charge 

2019 
$000 

2018 
$000 

30,415 

14,015 

5,779 
474 
355 

1,677 
1,745 
176 

2,663 

(1,332) 

205 

(724) 

1,149 

284 

10,206 

2,245 

The total tax charge for the year was $10.2m (2018: $2.2m charge) comprising a current tax charge of $6.6m (2018: $5.5m charge) in 
respect of Ukraine, a deferred tax charge before exceptional items of $2.0m (2018: credit of $1.5m) and a deferred tax charge of $1.7m 
in respect of exceptional items (2018: credit of $1.8m). The increase in current tax charge reflects a higher profitability in Ukraine. In 
Ukraine, the corporate tax rate for 2018 was 18% and remains at this level in 2019.  

The standard rate of corporation tax in the UK changed from 20% to 19% with effect from 1 April 2017. The Company’s profits for this 
accounting year are taxed at an effective rate of 19.00%. 

Factors that may affect future tax charges 
A significant proportion of the Group’s income will be generated overseas. Profits made overseas will not be able to be offset by costs 
elsewhere in the Group. This could lead to a higher than expected tax rate for the Group. 

Changes to the UK corporation tax rates were substantively enacted as part of Finance Bill 2015 and Finance Bill 2016. These include a 
reduction to the main rate from 19% to 17% from 1 April 2020. The impact of the rate reduction is not expected to have a material 
impact on UK current taxation.  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
122 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Notes to consolidated financial statements 

Taxation in Ukraine – production taxes 
Since Poltava Petroleum Company’s (‘PPC’s’) inception in 1994 the Company has operated in a regime where conflicting laws have 
existed, including in relation to effective taxes on oil and gas production.  

In order to avoid any confusion over the level of taxes due, in 1994, PPC entered into a licence agreement with the Ukrainian State 
Committee on Geology and the Utilisation of Mineral Resources (‘the Licence Agreement’) which set out expressly in the Licence 
Agreement that PPC would pay Rental Fees on production at a rate of only 5.5% of sales value for the duration of the Licence 
Agreement.  

Pursuant to the Licence Agreement, PPC was granted an exploration licence and four 20-year production licences, each in respect of a 
particular field. In 2004, PPC’s production licences were renewed and extended until 2024, Subsoil Use Agreements were signed and 
attached to the licences and operations continued as before.  

In December 1994, a new fee on the production of oil and gas (known as a ‘Rental Payment’ or ‘Rental Fee’) was introduced through 
Ukrainian regulations. On 30 December 1995, JKX, together with its Ukrainian subsidiaries (including PPC), was issued with a Joint 
Decision of the Ministry of Economy, the Ministry of Finance and the State Committee for the Oil and Gas (‘the Exemption Letter’), 
which established a zero rent payment rate for oil and natural gas produced in Ukraine by PPC for the duration of the Licence 
Agreement for Exploration and Exploitation of the Fields. Based on the Exemption Letter PPC did not expect to pay any Rental Fees 
until the new law on Rental Fees was enacted in 2011.  

Rental Fees paid since 2011 

In 2011 a new law was enacted which established new mechanisms for the determination of the Rental Fee. Notwithstanding the 
Exemption Letter, in January 2011 PPC began to pay the Rental Fee in order to avoid further issues with the Ukrainian authorities but 
without prejudice to its right to challenge the validity of the demands.  

Rental fees paid have been recorded in cost of sales in each of the accounting periods to which they relate. 

International arbitration proceedings  
In 2015, the Company and its wholly-owned Ukrainian and Dutch subsidiaries commenced arbitration proceedings against Ukraine 
under the Energy Charter Treaty, the bilateral investment treaties between Ukraine and the United Kingdom and the Netherlands, 
respectively. In these proceedings, the Company sought repayment of more than $180 million in Rental Fees that PPC had paid on 
production of oil and gas in Ukraine since 2011, in addition to damages to the business. 

During 2015 Rental Fees in Ukraine were increased to 55% and capital control restrictions were introduced. On 14 January 2015, an 
Emergency Arbitrator issued an Award ordering Ukraine not to collect Rental Fees from PPC in excess of 28% on gas produced by PPC, 
pending the outcome of the application to a full tribunal for the Interim Award. On 23 July 2015 an international arbitration tribunal 
issued an Interim Award requiring the Government of Ukraine to limit the collection of Rental Fees on gas produced by PPC to a rate of 
28%.  

The Interim Award was to remain in effect until final judgement was rendered on the main arbitration case, which was heard in early 
July 2016. A decision from the tribunal was awarded on 6 February 2017. 

The tribunal did not find in favour of the Company in respect of the Rental Fees but awarded the Company damages of $11.8 million 
plus interest, and costs of $0.3 million in relation to subsidiary claims. 

In March 2017, Ukraine's Ministry of Justice filed a claim with the High Court of the United Kingdom naming JKX as a defendant in an 
application seeking to set aside the arbitration award for damages against Ukraine and in favour of JKX.  

In October 2017 the High Court of the United Kingdom, ordered that the application brought by Ukraine seeking to set aside the recent 
arbitration award against Ukraine and in favour of JKX be dismissed. The Government of Ukraine is therefore still liable to pay to JKX 
the sum of USD11.8 million plus interest, and costs of USD0.3 million in relation to subsidiary claims, as previously ordered. The Judge 
also ordered that Ukraine should pay JKX's costs of $0.1 million.  

The arbitration award has now been legally recognised in Ukraine and in December 2019 JKX filed for its collection. No recognition will 
be made in the financial statements of any possible future benefit that may result from this award until there is further clarity on the 
process for, and likely success of, enforcing collection. 

Rental Fee demands  
The Group currently has two claims (2018: two) for additional Rental Fees being contested through the Ukrainian court process. These 
arise from disputes over the amount of Rental Fees paid by PPC for certain periods since 2010 (2018: 2010), which in total amount to 
approximately $41.3 million (2018: $42.5 million) (including interest and penalties), as detailed below. All amounts are being claimed in 
Ukrainian Hryvnia (‘UAH’) and are stated below at their US$-equivalent amounts using the year end rate of $1:UAH 23.69 (2018: $1: 
UAH 27.69).  

  August – December 2010: approximately $15.9 million (2018: $12.4 million) (including $10.7 million (2018: $8.0 million) of interest 

and penalties). On 11 March 2014 PPC won the case in the Poltava Court. The tax office appealed and the Kharkiv Appellate 
Administrative Court reversed the earlier decision. PPC then lost an appeal in the High Administrative Court of Ukraine and the 
Supreme Court rejected PPC’s application for the appeal. PPC has discovered that there were in fact certain procedures that were not 
followed regarding the tax notifications that formed the basis of the original claims against PPC. Certain documentation was found 
to be missing from the files of the tax authorities. In April 2017 the Poltava Circuit Administrative Court found in favour of PPC and 

 
123 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

cancelled the tax notification decisions on the grounds that due process had not been followed. On 1 June 2017 the Kharkiv Appellate 
Administrative Court upheld the judgment of the Poltava Circuit Administrative Court. In July 2017 the Poltava Joint State Tax 
Inspectorate ("PJSTI") filed a cassation complaint against the previous court judgements of lower courts in PPC's favour. This 
cassation hearing at the Supreme Court of Ukraine is expected before the end of 2020. Whilst PPC has been successful in the April, 
June and July 2017 court hearings, the Board considers it appropriate to maintain a provision notwithstanding that PPC disputes the 
claim basis, given assessment of all relevant facts and circumstances. 

  January – December 2015: approximately $25.4 million (2018: $30.1 million) (including $16.7 million (2018: $17.9 million) of interest 
and penalties). Following the commencement of international arbitration proceedings at the beginning of 2015 (see above), from July 
2015 PPC reverted to paying a 28% Rental Fee for gas production (instead of the revised official rate of 55%) as a result of the 
awards granted under the arbitration. PPC also declared part of its Rental Fee payments at 55% for the first 6 months of 2015 as 
overpayments and consequently stopped paying the Rental Fee for gas in order to align the total payments made in 2015 with the 
28% rate awarded made under the arbitration proceedings. The Ukrainian tax authorities have issued PPC with the series of claims 
for the difference between 28% and 55%, which were being contested in eight separate cases.  Four of these cases have now been 
resolved in PPC’s favour and the others continue to be contested:   

  Case No. 816/845/16 for principal of $0.3m. In December 2018 the Poltava Circuit Administrative Court, and in May 2019 the 

Kharkiv Appellate Administrative Court, found in favour of PPC and both ruled that Tax Notification Decisions previously issued 
against PPC were illegal and were cancelled. It was expected that PJSTI would file cassation complaint. In July 2019 the Supreme 
Court of Ukraine refused to accept the cassation complaint of the PJSTI for procedural reasons, meaning that these decisions will 
not be appealed.  This case is therefore closed in favour of PPC. 

  Case No. 816/688/16 for principal of $1.8m. In April 2019, the Poltava Circuit Administrative Court, found in favour of PPC and 
ruled that Tax Notification Decisions previously issued against PPC were illegal and were cancelled.  As PJSTI did not file an 
appeal within the required time, the judgement of the Poltava Circuit Administrative Court is now binding.  This case is therefore 
closed in favour of PPC. 

  Two cases (Nos. No. 816/846/16 and No. 816/844/16) for a total principal of $3.5m. On 14 November 2019 the Poltava Circuit 
Administrative Court found in favor of PPC in both cases as well as ruled that Tax Notification Decisions previously issued 
against PPC were illegal and were cancelled. PJSTI filed appellate complaints in both cases, however, failed to pay the court fee. 
The Kharkiv Appellate Administrative Court returned in January 2020 appellate complaints in both cases without consideration. 
PJSTI had time until mid-March 2020 to challenge the above return of appellate complaints, however they failed to do so. Thus, 
the cases are effectively closed in favour of PPC. 

  Two cases (Nos. 816/687/16 and 816/1191/16) for a total principal of $2.1m are in the process of consideration by the first 

instance court of merits. 

  Case No. 816/685/16 for a total principal of $2.2m was previously suspended. PJSTI have filed cassation complaint with the 

Supreme Court to unsuspend it. The hearing is expected to take place in the second half of 2020. If PJSTI is successful at these 
hearings, then the case will be considered by the first instance court of merits. 

  Case No. 816/686/16 for a total principal of $4.4m were previously confirmed as suspended by the Supreme Court.  It is expected 

that PJSTI may file motions in the first instance court to renew these cases. 

It is expected that the process of hearings in respect of the remaining outstanding 2015 rental fee claims will continue into 2021 and 
possibly beyond.  Full provisions are made for all these outstanding claims and classified as non-current.  In 2019 reversals  have been 
applied to the provisions (inclusive of interest and penalties) of $0.6m in respect of Case No. 816/845/16, $4.8m in respect of Case No. 
816/688/16,  $5.3m in respect of Case No. 816/846/16 and $3.7m in respect of Case No. 816/844/16,  as all four cases have been 
closed in PPC’s favour. 

An exceptional item of $8.4 million has been credited to the Consolidated income statement in the year (2018: $5.1 million charge), 
being the net of provisions reversed for cases closed in PPC’s favour and interest accrued on the remaining  August – December 2010 
and January – December 2015 claims (see Note 18).  

 
 
 
 
 
124 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Notes to consolidated financial statements 

26. Deferred tax 

Continuing operations 

Ukraine  

Russia  

Deferred tax asset  

Assets 

Liability 

Net 

2019 
$000 

2018 
$000 

2019 
$000 

2018 
$000 

8,108 

12,033 

9,193 

11,130 

(8,280) 

(3,849) 

(8,227) 

(1,677) 

2019 
$000 

(172) 

8,184 

2018 
$000 

966 

9,453 

8,012 

10,419 

Refer to Note 2 for details of reclassifications between deferred tax assets and liabilities affecting the comparative information.  

The balance comprises temporary differences attributable to: 

Property, plant and equipment   

Inventory  

Provision for disputed rental fees 

Provision for site restoration   

Tax losses 

Other 

Deferred tax asset 
/(liability)recognised 

Deferred tax liabilities 

Property, plant and equipment   

Other 

Deferred tax assets 

Inventory  

Provision for disputed rental fees 

Provision for site restoration   

Tax losses 

Other 

Net deferred tax  

Assets 

Liability  

Net 

2018 
$000 

2019 
$000 

2018 
$000 

2019 
$000 

2018 
$000 

- 

(12,128) 

(9,635) 

(12,128) 

(9,635) 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

614 

6,528 

1,131 

1,206 

7,038 

1,058 

11,556 

10,721 

2019 
$000 

- 

614 

6,528 

1,131 

1,206 

7,038 

1,058 

11,556 

10,721 

311 

300 

(1) 

(269) 

310 

31 

20,141 

20,323 

(12,129) 

(9,904) 

8,012 

10,419 

1 January  
2019 
$000 

exchange 
differences  
$000 

to profit  
or loss 
$000 

31 December 
2019 
$000 

(9,635) 

(269) 

1,206 

7,038 

1,058 

10,721 

300 

10,419 

(1,511) 

32 

191 

1,188 

160 

1,310 

(132) 

1,238 

(982) 

236 

(783) 

(1,698) 

(87) 

(474) 

143 

(3,645) 

(12,128) 

(1) 

614 

6,528 

1,131 

11,556 

310 

8,012 

* Note there are minor differences in the tables due to rounding effects  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
125 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

(Charged)/credited   

1 January 

exchange 

2018 

$000 

differences 

to profit or loss * 

$000 

$000 

(9,941) 

(3,000) 

1,215 

5,277 

925 

10,858 

584 

5,918 

- 

- 

- 

- 

(75) 

(1,221) 

- 

(1,296) 

306 

167 

(9) 

1,761 

208 

1,084 

(284) 

3,233 

classified as 

discontinued 
operation and 
credited to 

income 
statement 
$000 

- 

2,564 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

31 December 

2018 

$000 

(9,635) 

(269) 

1,206 

7,038 

1,058 

10,721 

300 

2,564  

10,419 

Deferred tax liabilities 

Property, plant and equipment   

Other 

Deferred tax assets 

Inventory  

Provision for disputed rental fees 

Provision for site restoration   

Tax losses 

Other 

Net deferred tax  

* Out of charge of $1.3m, $2.4m (charge) relates to discontinued operation (refer to Note 14) and $3.8m (credit) to continuing operation.   

The deferred tax assets include an amount of $11.6m (2018: $10.7m) which relates to carried forward tax losses of our Russian 
subsidiary. The Group concluded that the deferred tax assets will be recoverable using the estimated future income based on the 
approved business plans and budgets for the subsidiary notwithstanding historic losses. The subsidiary is expected to generate 
taxable income from 2020 onwards. 

Unprovided deferred taxation 

Tax losses 

Property, plant and equipment   

Other temporary differences 

2019  
$000 

2018 
$000 

(12,547) 

(35,439) 

- 

- 

- 

- 

(12,547)  

(35,439) 

There is no expiry date on the remaining losses as at 31 December 2019. The UK corporation tax main rate will be at 19% for the next 
year and starting from 1 April 2020 will be reduced to 17%. The impact of the rate reduction is not expected to have a material impact.  

27. Earnings per share 

The calculation of the basic and diluted earnings per share attributable to the owners of the parent is based on the weighted average 
number of shares in issue during the year of 168,090,217 (2018: 166,723,145), including shares held to satisfy the Group’s employee 
share schemes and shares purchased by the Company and held as treasury shares of 4,035,699 (2018: 5,402,771), and the profit for the 
relevant year.  

Profit before exceptional items in 2019 of $13,246,738 (2018 profit: $18,550,956) is calculated from the 2019 profit of $22,212,692  
(2018: $15,257,404) adjusted for exceptional items of $10,642,954(2018: $5,054,552) and the related deferred tax on the exceptional 
items of $1,677,000 (2018: $1,761,000). 

The diluted earnings per share for the year is based on 173,176,095 (2018: 176,455,391) ordinary shares calculated as follows: 

Profit 

Profit for the purpose of basic and diluted earnings per share (profit for the year attributable to the 
owners of the parent): 

After exceptional item 

Before exceptional item 

2019  
$000 

2018  
$000 

22,213 

13,247 

15,257 

18,551 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
126 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Notes to consolidated financial statements 

Number of shares 

Basic weighted average number of shares 

Treasury shares 

Shares held in Employee Benefit Trust (Note 15) 

Sale of shares held by Employee Benefit Trust (Note 15) 

Exercise of share options (Note 24) 

Weighted average number of shares  

Dilutive potential ordinary shares: 

Share options 

Convertible bonds 2020  

2019 

2018 

172,125,916 

  172,125,916 

(402,771) 

(402,771) 

(5,000,000) 

(5,000,000) 

1,186,547 

180,525 

- 

- 

168,090,217 

166,723,145 

- 

- 

256,150 

9,476,096 

Weighted average number of shares for diluted earnings per share 

168,090,217 

176,455,391 

In accordance with IAS 33 (Earnings per share) the effects of antidilutive potential have not been included when calculating dilutive 
earnings per share for the year end 31 December 2019. 5,085,878 potentially dilutive ordinary shares associated with the convertible 
bonds (Note 13) have been excluded as they are antidilutive in 2019.  

The effects of dilutive potential have been included when calculating dilutive earnings per share for the years ended 31 December 
2018. 9,476,096 potentially dilutive ordinary shares associated with the convertible bonds have been included as they are dilutive at 31 
December 2018. 

There were no outstanding share options at 31 December 2019 (2018: 256,150, of which 256,150 had a potentially dilutive effect). All of 
the Group’s equity derivatives were anti-dilutive for the year ended 31 December 2019 (2018: all dilutive).  

28. Dividends 

No interim dividend was paid for 2019 (2018: nil). In respect of the full year 2019, the directors do not propose a final dividend (2018: no 
final dividend paid). 

29. Reconciliation of profit from operations to net cash inflow from operations 

Profit from operations (continuing operations) 

Profit from operations (discontinued operations) 

Depreciation, depletion and amortisation 

Gain on disposal of fixed assets 

Exceptional item – (decrease)/increase in provision for production based taxes, including forex 

Reversal of provision for impairment of Hungary 

Increase in provisions – onerous lease provision, including forex 

Abandonment provision write-off 

Share-based payment charge 

Cash generated from operations before changes in working capital 

Decrease/(increase) in operating trade and other receivables 

Increase in operating trade and other payables 

Increase in inventories 

Net cash generated from continuing operations 

Net cash used in discontinued operations (Note 14) 

2019 
$000 

31,550 

2,004 

19,217 

(98) 

(8,410) 

(2,232) 

- 

- 

14 

42,045 

1,156 

1,811 

(3,802) 

41,386 

(176) 

2018  
$000 

15,676 

930 

 15,155 

 -  

5,441 

- 

284 

(172) 

13 

37,327 

 (1,288) 

1,250 

 (166) 

 37,281 

(158) 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
127 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Changes in liabilities from financing activities  

The table below details changes in the Group’s liabilities arising from financing activities, including both cash and non-cash changes. 
Liabilities arising from financing activities are those for which cash flows were, or future cash flows will be, classified in the Group’s 
consolidated cash flow statement as cash flows from financing activities. 

At 1 January 2019 

Cash flows  

- Payment of principal 

- Payment of interest 

Non-cash flows 

- Accruals 

- Foreign exchange 

- Interest accruing in the period 

At 31 December 2019 

At 1 January 2018 

Cash flows  

- Payment of principal 

- Payment of interest 

- Accretion payment 

Non-cash flows 

- Interest accruing in the period 

At 31 December 2018 

30. Capital commitments 

Borrowings 
$000 

Leases 
$000 

11,003 

3,511 

(5,280) 

(1,131) 

(1,776) 

- 

- 

- 

1,091 

5,683 

134 

(34) 

254 

2,089 

Borrowings 
$000 

16,633 

(5,280) 

(1,870) 

(480) 

2,000 

11,003 

Under the work programmes for the Group’s exploration and development licenses the Group had no commitments to future capital 
expenditure on drilling rigs and facilities at 31 December 2019 (2018: $4.4m). 

31. Related party transactions 

Key management compensation 
Key management personnel are considered to comprise only the Directors. The remuneration of Directors during the year was as 
follows: 

Short-term employee benefits 

Share-based payments charge 

2019  
$000 

1,141 

14 

1,155 

2018  
$000 

670 

13 

683 

Further information about the remuneration of individual Directors, together with the Directors’ interests in the share capital of JKX 
Oil & Gas plc, is provided in the audited part of the Remuneration Report on pages 59 to 63 and in the Directors Report on page 71.  

Three Non Executive Directors joined the Board during 2019 following removal of two Non Executive Directors at 2019 Annual General 
meeting (AGM) and resignations of the other two Non Executive Directors after 2019 AGM. Victor Gladun was appointed as an 
Executive Director of the Company at the AGM and on 20 September he was additionally appointed as the CEO of the JKX Group. Please 
refer to the Remuneration Report on page 59 for the disclosure on the bonus awarded to the Group CEO for 2019 (2018: nil). 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
128 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

GROUP FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Notes to consolidated financial statements 

There were five Non Executive Directors at 31 December 2018 following resignations of Vladimir Tatarchuk and Vladimir Rusinov on 
16 August 2018. There were no Executive Directors appointed as Directors in 2018.  

Share-based payments represents the expenses arising from share-based payments included in the income statement, determined 
based on the fair value of the related awards at the date of grant (Note 24). 

Transactions with related parties 
The transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries, which are related parties, have been eliminated on consolidation.  

PJSC  “Mining Company Ukrnaftoburinnya” (“UNB”), a Ukrainian oil and gas company in which Group holds a 10% of the ordinary share 
capital was considered a related party at 31 December 2019. One of the Group’s Non Executive Directors, Michael Bakunenko, a 
member of Audit and Remuneration Committees, is also a Chairman of the Board of UNB.  

The following transactions were carried out with UNB: 

Gas sales 

Sale of property, plant and equipment (pipes) 

Oil purchase 

2019  
$000 

1,330 

135 

2019  
$000 

- 

2018  
$000 

662 

- 

2018  
$000 

240 

Gas, oil and property, plant and equipment are sold and purchased on normal commercial terms and conditions. 

Vladimir Tatarchuk and Vladimir Rusinov were appointed to the Board on 28 January 2016 and had a beneficial interest in Convertible 
Bonds with principal amount of $3.4m (interest and accretion amount of $0.8m) at 31 December 2017, which are held by Proxima (see 
Notes 11 and 12).  

In February 2018, the following redemptions were made in relation to Proxima’s bond holding and in accordance with the terms and 
conditions of the restructured Bonds (see Note 11):  
  $1.1m in respect of first instalment of the principal; 

  $0.1m in respect of prior accretion amounts; 

  $0.2m Bond interest payment. 

On 16 August 2018 Vladimir Tatarchuk and Vladimir Rusinov tendered their resignations with immediate effect, and such resignations 
were accepted by the board. They ceased to be related parties as of this date. 

Subsidiary undertakings and joint operations 
The Company’s principal subsidiary undertakings including the name, country of incorporation, registered address and proportion of 
ownership interest for each are disclosed in Note B to the Company’s separate financial statements which follow these consolidated 
financial statements. 

Transactions between subsidiaries and between the Company and its subsidiaries are eliminated on consolidation.  

32. Audit exemptions for subsidiary companies 

The Group has elected to take advantage of the full extent of the exemptions available under Section 479A of the Companies Act 2006. 
Exemption from mandatory audit in section 479A of the act is available for qualifying subsidiaries that fulfil a set of conditions. As a 
result, statutory financial statements will not be audited for the following UK entities:  JKX Services Limited, JKX Bulgaria Limited, JKX 
Georgia Ltd, JKX (Ukraine) Ltd, Baltic Energy Trading Ltd, EuroDril Limited, JP Kenny Exploration & Production Limited, Page Gas Ltd, 
Trans-European Energy Services Limited, JKX Limited.  

33. Events after the reporting date 

On 19 February 2020 the Company made a payment of the final instalment to Bondholders of $5.4m (34% of the principal amount of 
the Bonds), together with $0.4m interest payment in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Bond. 

In early February 2018 the Group announced its intention to exit its oil and gas operations in Hungary and initiated an active 
programme to dispose of its Hungarian business. The sale-purchase agreement for the disposal of the Hungarian business for expected 
consideration of around $2.9m was executed in March 2020. 

At the date of approval of these consolidated financial statements, Covid-19 continues to spread internationally, contributing to a 
sharp decline in global financial markets and a significant decrease in global economic activity. On 11 March 2020, the Covid-19 
outbreak was declared a global pandemic by the World Health Organization and has since then resulted in numerous governments and 
companies, including JKX, introducing a variety of measures to contain the spread of the virus. The outbreak has also created 
significant volatility in financial markets and is considered to have negatively impacted commodity prices, including oil prices, which is 
relevant to financial performance since year end and may impact future asset values should they remain depressed. 

 
 
 
 
 
129 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Company statement of financial position 

For the year ended 31 December 2019 

Company number 3050645 

Assets 

Non-current assets 

Investments 

Right-of-use assets 

Other receivables 

Current assets 

Trade and other receivables 

Cash and cash equivalents 

Total assets 

Liabilities 

Current liabilities  

Trade and other payables 

Lease liabilities 

Non-current liabilities 

Derivatives 

Lease liabilities 

Total liabilities 

Net Assets 

Equity 

Share capital 

Share premium  

Other reserves 

Accumulated deficit 

Total equity 

Note 

2019 
$000 

2018 
$000 

B 

A 

C 

C 

E 

F 

F 

F 

F 

G 

G  

21,424 

 21,424  

240 

47,881 

69,545 

263  

8,825 

9,088 

- 

 104,700   

 126,124 

 631  

13,272 

13,903 

78,633 

 140,027 

(15,391) 

 (81,301) 

(139) 

- 

(15,530) 

(81,301) 

- 

(133) 

(62) 

- 

(15,663) 

 (81,363) 

62,970 

58,664 

 26,666  

 97,476  

(503) 

 26,666  

 97,476  

 (503) 

(60,669) 

(64,975) 

62,970 

 58,664 

The Company has elected to take the exemption under section 408 of the Companies Act 2006, to not present the parent company 
income statement. The net profit for the parent company was $3.8m (2018: $12.1m loss). 

These financial statements on pages 129 to 140 were approved by the Board of Directors on 31 March 2020 and signed on its behalf by: 

Victor Gladun 

Chief Executive Officer 

Ben Fraser 

Chief Financial Officer 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
130 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Company statement of changes in equity 

For the year ended 31 December 2019 

At 1 January 2018 

Loss for the financial year 

Total comprehensive loss for the year 

Transactions with equity shareholders 

Share option charge 

Total transactions with equity shareholders 

Share 
capital 
$000 

Share 
premium  
$000 

Accumulated 
deficit 
$000 

26,666 

97,476 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

(52,922) 

(12,066) 

(12,066) 

13 

13 

Other  
reserves 
$000 

(503) 

- 

- 

- 

- 

Total 
equity 
$000 

70,717 

(12,066) 

(12,066) 

13 

13 

At 31 December 2018 

26,666 

97,476 

(64,975) 

(503) 

58,664 

At 1 January 2019 

Profit for the financial year 

Total comprehensive loss for the year 

Transactions with equity shareholders 

Share option charge 

Exercise of share options 

Sale of shares held by Employee Benefit Trust 1 

Total transactions with equity shareholders 

Share 
capital 
$000 

Share 
premium  
$000 

Accumulated 
deficit 
$000 

Other  
reserves 
$000 

Total 
equity 
$000 

26,666 

97,476 

(64,975) 

(503) 

58,664 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

3,833 

3,833 

14 

17 

442 

473 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

3,833 

3,833 

14 

17 

442 

473 

At 31 December 2019 

26,666 

97,476 

(60,669) 

(503) 

62,970 

1  Please refer to Group Consolidated financial statements for the full disclosure on the sale of shares held by Employee Benefit Trust in Note 15. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
131 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Notes to the Company financial statements 

A. Presentation of the financial statements 

Basis of preparation 
The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, as modified for financial assets and financial 
liabilities (including derivative instruments) at fair value through income statement, and in accordance with the Companies Act 2006 
as applicable to companies using Financial Reporting Standard 101, ‘Reduced Disclosure Framework’ (FRS 101).  

Please refer to Directors’ report on pages 73 to 76 for information on Company’s domicile, legal form, country of incorporation, 
description of the nature of the entity’s operations and business activities. 

Going concern 

Please refer to Group Consolidated financial statements for the full disclosure on Going Concern on pages 91 - 92. 

Adoption of new and revised standards 
IFRS 16 is effective for the year ended 31 December 2019. Please refer to Group’s accounting policies note for the full disclosure.  

There were no retrospective adjustments as a result of adopting IFRS 16 ‘Leases’. The Company’s amended accounting policy applied 
from 1 January 2019 is disclosed below.  

IFRS 16 specifies how to recognise, measure, present and disclose leases. The standard provides a single lessee accounting model, 
requiring lessees to recognise right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for all material leases. It results in almost all leases being 
recognised on the balance sheet by lessees, as the distinction between operating and finance leases was removed. Under the new 
standard, an asset (the right to use the leased item) and a financial liability to pay rentals are recognised. The only exceptions are short-
term and low-value leases. 

The Company adopted IFRS 16 from 1 January 2019 using the modified retrospective approach and accordingly the information 
presented for 2018 is not restated. It remains as previously reported under IAS 17 and related interpretations. On initial application, 
the Company elected to record right-of-use assets based on the corresponding lease liability. A right-of-use asset and lease obligations 
of $0.4m were recorded as of 1 January 2019, with no net impact on retained earnings. When measuring lease liabilities, the Company 
discounted lease payments using its incremental borrowing rate at 1 January 2019. The weighted-average rate applied is 14%.  

The balance sheet shows the following amounts relating to leases: 

Properties 

Total  

The income statement shows the following amounts relating to leases: 

Interest on lease liabilities 

Total  

1 January  
2019  
$000 

375 

375 

Depreciation 
charge for the 
year 
$000 

31 December 
2019  
$000 

(135) 

(135 

240 

240 

31 December 
2019  
$000 

44 

44 

The following table reconciles the Company’s operating lease obligations at 31 December 2018, as disclosed in the Company’s financial 
statements, to the lease obligations recognised on initial application of IFRS 16 at 1 January 2019.  

Operating lease commitments at 31 December 2018 

Discounted using the incremental borrowing rate at 1 January 2018 

Effect of discounting 

Impairment provision to be recognised on one of the properties 

$ 

0.9 

0.4 

0.1 

0.4 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
132 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Notes to the Company financial statements 

Disclosure exemptions 
The Company has taken advantage of the following disclosure exemptions under FRS 101: 

  Presentation of  statement of cash flows; 

  The requirements of IFRS 7 ‘Financial instruments’: Disclosure of quantitative and qualitative information regarding risks arising 

from all financial instruments held by the Company. Equivalent disclosures are included in the Group’s consolidated financial 
statements; 

  The requirement of IFRS 13 ‘Fair Value Measurement’ to disclose the valuation techniques and inputs used to develop fair value 

measurements for assets and liabilities held at fair value. Equivalent disclosures are included in the Group consolidated financial 
statements; 

  Disclosure of related party transactions entered into between two or more members of a Group. Equivalent disclosures are included 

in the Group consolidated financial statements; 

   Disclosure of information relating to new standards not yet effective and not yet applied. 

Property, plant and equipment 
Property, plant and equipment are stated at historic purchase cost less accumulated depreciation. Cost includes the original purchase 
price of the asset and the costs attributable to bringing the asset to its working condition for its intended use. Depreciation is calculated 
to write off the cost of property, plant and equipment, less their residual values, over their expected useful lives using the straight line 
basis as follows: 

Fixtures and fittings 

Computer equipment and software 

- five to ten years 

- three years 

Investments in subsidiaries 
Investments are initially measured at historic cost, including transaction costs, and stated at cost less accumulated impairment losses. 
The Company assesses investments for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an 
investment may not be recoverable. If any such indication of impairment exists, the Company makes an estimate of its recoverable 
amount. Where the carrying amount of an investment exceeds its recoverable amount, the investment is considered impaired and is 
written down to its recoverable amount. 

Foreign currencies 
Transactions in foreign currencies are initially recorded at the exchange rate ruling at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and 
liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the rates of exchange ruling at the statement of financial position date, 
with a corresponding charge or credit to the income statement. Non-monetary items are measured in terms of historical cost in foreign 
currency and are translated using the exchange rates of the original transaction. 

The presentation and functional currency of the Company is the US Dollar. The US$/£ exchange rate used for the revaluation of the 
closing statement of financial position at 31 December 2019 was $1/£0.76 (2018: $1/£0.78). 

Share based payments 
The Company operates a number of equity-settled, share-based compensation plans, under which the Company receives services from 
Executive Directors and Senior Management as consideration for equity instruments (options) of the Company. The fair value of the 
services received from Executive Directors and Senior Management in exchange for the grant of the options is recognised as an 
expense. The total amount to be expensed is determined by reference to the fair value of the options granted: 

  including any market performance conditions; (for example, the Company’s share price); 

  excluding the impact of any service and non-market performance vesting conditions (for example, profitability, sales growth targets 

and remaining an employee of the entity over a specified time period); and 

   including the impact of any non-vesting conditions (for example, the requirement for employees to save). 

Non-market performance and service conditions are included in assumptions about the number of options that are expected to vest. 
The total expense is recognised over the vesting period, which is the period over which all of the specified vesting conditions are to be 
satisfied. 

In addition, in some circumstances employees may provide services in advance of the grant date and therefore the grant date fair value 
is estimated for the purposes of recognising the expense during the period between service commencement period and grant date. 

At the end of each reporting period, the Company revises its estimates of the number of options that are expected to vest based on the 
non-market vesting conditions. It recognises the impact of the revision to original estimates, if any, in the income statement, with a 
corresponding adjustment to equity. 

When the options are exercised, the Company issues new shares or shares held by the JKX Employee Benefit Trust. The proceeds 
received net of any directly attributable transaction costs are credited to share capital (nominal value) and share premium. 

The grant by the Company of options over its equity instruments to the employees of subsidiary undertakings in the group is treated as 
a capital contribution. The fair value of employee services received, measured by reference to the grant date fair value, is  recognised 

 
 
 
133 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

over the vesting period as an increase to investment in subsidiary undertakings, with a corresponding credit to equity in the parent 
entity financial statements. 

The social security contributions payable in connection with the grant of the share options is considered an integral part of the grant 
itself, and the change will be treated as a cash-settled transaction. 

The rules regarding the scheme are described in the Remuneration Report on pages 67 to 68 and in Note H on share based payments. 

Share capital and treasury shares 
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of ordinary shares are recognised as a 
deduction from share premium, net of any tax effects.  

When share capital recognised as equity is repurchased, the amount of the consideration paid, which includes directly attributable 
costs, net of any tax effects, is recognised in retained earnings.  

Repurchased JKX Oil & Gas plc shares are classified as treasury shares in shareholders’ equity and are presented in the retained 
earnings. The consideration paid, including any directly attributable incremental costs is deducted from equity attributable to the 
Company’s equity holders until the shares are cancelled or reissued.  

When treasury shares are sold or reissued subsequently, the amount received is recognised as an increase in equity, and the resulting 
surplus or deficit on the transaction is presented in share premium. No gain or loss is recognised in the financial statements on the 
purchase, sale, issue or cancellation of treasury shares. 

JKX Employee Benefit Trust 
The JKX Employee Benefit Trust was established in 2013 to hold ordinary shares purchased to satisfy various new share scheme 
awards made to the employees of the Company which will be transferred to the members of the scheme on their respective vesting 
dates subject to satisfying the performance conditions of each scheme.  

Leases 
At inception of a contract, the Company assesses whether a contract is, or contains, a lease based on whether the contract conveys the 
right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration.  

The Company recognises a right-of-use asset and a lease liability at the lease commencement date. The right-of-use asset is initially 
measured based on the initial amount of the lease liability adjusted for any lease payments made at or before the commencement date, 
plus any initial direct costs incurred and an estimate of costs to dismantle and remove the underlying asset or to restore the underlying 
asset or the site on which it is located, less any lease incentives received.  

The asset is depreciated to the earlier of the end of the useful life of the right-of-use asset or the lease term using the straight-line 
method as this most closely reflects the expected pattern of consumption of the future economic benefits. The lease term includes 
periods covered by an option to extend if the Company is reasonably certain to exercise that option. Lease terms range from two to 
three years for offices. In addition, the right-of-use asset is periodically reduced by impairment losses, if any, and adjusted for certain 
remeasurements of the lease liability.  

The lease liability is initially measured at the present value of the lease payments that are not paid at the commencement date, 
discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease or, if that rate cannot be readily determined, the Company’s incremental 
borrowing rate. Generally, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate as the discount rate. The lease liability is measured at 
amortised cost using the effective interest method. It is remeasured when there is a change in future lease payments arising from a 
change in an index or rate, if there is a change in the Company’s estimate of the amount expected to be payable under a residual value 
guarantee, or if the Company changes its assessment of whether it will exercise a purchase, extension or termination option. When the 
lease liability is remeasured in this way, a corresponding adjustment is made to the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset, or the 
effect is recorded in profit or loss if the carrying amount of the right-of-use asset has been reduced to zero.  

The Company elected to apply the practical expedient not to recognise right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for short-term leases 
that have a lease term of 12 months or less and leases of low-value assets. The Company also made use of the practical expedient to not 
recognise a right-of-use asset or a lease liability for leases for which the lease term ends within 12 months of the date of initial 
application. 

The lease payments associated with these leases are recognised as an expense on a straight-line basis over the lease term.  

The Company did not elect to apply the practical expedient to grandfather the assessment of which transactions are leases on the date 
of initial application, as previously assessed under IAS 17 and IFRIC 4. The Company applied the definition of a lease under IFRS 16 to 
all existing contracts. 

Financial instruments 
Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised on the Company’s balance sheet when the Company becomes party to the 
contractual provisions of the instrument. 

Derivative financial instruments 
The Company accounts for derivative financial instruments in line with IFRS 9 – ‘Financial Instruments’. 

 
 
134 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Notes to the Company financial statements 

Any such derivative was initially recorded at fair value on the date at which the contract was entered into and subsequently re-
measured at fair value on subsequent reporting dates. 

Fair value is the amount for which a financial asset, liability or instrument could be exchanged between knowledgeable and willing 
parties in an arm’s length transaction. The value of the derivative is calculated at inception using the Monte Carlo simulation 
methodology and subsequently using the Black-Scholes formula, and the Company’s historic share price and volatility, treasury rates 
and other estimations. As it is derived from inputs that are not from observable market data it is grouped into level 3 within the fair 
value measurement hierarchy. 

Other receivables  
Other receivables include intercompany receivables which are initially recorded at their transaction price in accordance with IFRS 9 
and are subsequently measured at amortised cost, reduced by any provision for impairment. IFRS 9 sets out a new forward looking 
‘expected loss’ impairment model which replaced the incurred loss model in IAS 39. Under the IFRS 9 ‘expected loss’ model, a credit 
event (or impairment ‘trigger’) no longer has to occur before credit losses are recognised. Expected credit losses are assessed on a 
forward looking basis. The loss allowance is measured at initial recognition and throughout its life at an amount equal to lifetime ECL. 
Any impairment is recognised in the income statement within ‘Administrative expenses’. 

Cash and cash equivalents 
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash in hand and current balances with banks and similar institutions, which are readily 
convertible to known amounts of cash. Cash is short-term with an original maturity of less than 3 months, highly liquid investments 
that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value. 

Trade and other payables 
Trade and other payables are initially measured at fair value, and are subsequently measured at amortised cost, using the effective 
interest rate method if the time value of money is significant. 

Financial liabilities and equity 
Financial liabilities and equity instruments are classified according to the substance of the contractual arrangements entered into. An 
equity instrument is any contract that evidences a residual interest in the assets of the Company after deducting all of its liabilities. 
Equity instruments issued by the Company are recorded at the proceeds received net of direct issue costs. 

Dividends 
Interim dividends are recognised when they are paid to the Company’s shareholders. Final dividends are recognised when they are 
approved by shareholders. 

Taxation 
Income tax expense represents the sum of the current tax payable and deferred tax. 

The current tax payable is based on taxable profit for the year. Taxable profit differs from net profit as reported in the income 
statement because it excludes items of income or expense that are taxable or deductible in other years and it further excludes items 
that are never taxable or deductible. Company’s liability for current tax is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or 
substantively enacted by the reporting date.  

Tax is charged or credited in the income statement, except when it relates to items charged or credited directly to equity or in other 
comprehensive income, in which case the tax is also dealt with in equity or other comprehensive income respectively. 

Deferred tax is the tax expected to be payable or recoverable on differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities in the 
financial statements and the corresponding tax base used in the computation of taxable profit. Deferred tax liabilities are generally 
recognised for all taxable temporary differences and deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable 
profits will be available against which deductible temporary differences can be recognised. Such assets and liabilities are not 
recognised if the temporary difference arises from goodwill or from the initial recognition (other than in a business combination) of 
other assets and liabilities in a transaction that affects neither the tax profit nor the accounting profit.  

Deferred tax liabilities are recognised for taxable temporary differences arising on investments in subsidiaries, and interests in joint 
ventures, except where the Company is able to control the reversal of the temporary difference and it is probable that the temporary 
difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future. 

The carrying amount of deferred tax assets is reviewed at each reporting date and reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable 
that sufficient taxable profit will be available to allow all or part of the asset to be recovered. Any such reduction shall be reversed to 
the extent that it becomes probable that sufficient taxable profit will be available. 

Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period when the liability is settled or the asset realised 
based on tax rates and laws substantively enacted by the reporting date. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there exists 
a legal and enforceable right to offset and they relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority and the Company intends 
to settle its current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis. 

 
 
135 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

B. Investments  

The net book value of unlisted fixed asset investments comprises: 

Cost 

At 1 January and 31 December 

Equity investment in subsidiaries 

At 31 December  

2019 
$000 

2018 
$000 

21,424 

21,424 

21,424 

21,424 

21,424 

21,424 

During 2012, JKX Oil & Gas (Jersey) Limited was incorporated in Jersey as a wholly-owned subsidiary. Its sole activity is to hold the 
bonds that were issued in February 2013 and which provided finance for the JKX Group of companies (see Note 11 to the consolidated 
financial statements). The amounts are considered recoverable based on post year end liquidation distributions. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
136 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Notes to the Company financial statements 

At 31 December 2019, subsidiary undertakings of JKX Oil & Gas plc were: 

Name 

Adygea Gas B.V. 1 

Baltic Catering Services 7 

Baltic Energy Trading Ltd* 4 

Catering-Yug LLC3 

Eastern Ukrainian Pipeline Ltd 7 

EuroDril Limited4 

JKX Bulgaria Limited* 9 

JKX Bulkan BG EAD 9 

JKX Georgia Ltd*4 

JKX Hungary BV 1 

JKX Ltd*5 

JKX (Navtobi) Limited 8 

JKX (Nederland) B.V. 1 

JKX Oil & Gas (Jersey) Limited* 5 

JKX Services Limited*4 

JKX Ukraine BV 1 

JKX (Ukraine) Ltd* 4 

JP Kenny Exploration & Production 
Limited* 4 
Kharkiv Investment Company 7 

Page Gas Ltd* 4 

Poltava Gas B.V. 1 

Business 

Holding 

Oil & gas services 

% held 
(ordinary 
shares) 

Country of incorporation 
and area of operation 

100.00  Netherlands 

100.00  Ukraine 

Oil & gas exploration and production 

100.00  UK 

Oil & gas services 

Oil & gas services 

100.00  Russia 

100.00  Ukraine 

Oil & gas exploration, production and services 

100.00  UK 

Oil & gas exploration and production 

100.00  UK 

Oil & gas exploration and production 

100.00  Bulgaria 

Oil & gas exploration, production and services 

100.00  UK 

Oil & gas exploration and production 

100.00  Netherlands 

Dormant 

Oil & gas exploration and production 

Finance and Holding 

Finance 

Services 

Finance and Holding 

100.00  UK 

100.00  Cyprus 

100.00  Netherlands 

100.00 

Jersey 

100.00  UK 

100.00  Netherlands 

Oil & gas exploration, production and services 

100.00  UK 

Finance and Holding 

100.00  UK  

Holding 

100.00  Ukraine 

Oil & gas exploration and production 

100.00  UK 

Holding 

100.00  Netherlands 

Poltava Petroleum Company 2 

Oil & gas exploration and production 

100.00  Ukraine 

Folyópart Energia Kft 10 

Oil & gas exploration, production and services 

100.00  Hungary 

Trans-European Energy Services Limited* 4  Oil & gas exploration, production and services 

100.00  UK 

Yuzhgazenergie LLC 6 

Oil & gas exploration, production and services 

100.00  Russia 

* Held directly by JKX Oil & Gas plc. All other companies are held through subsidiary undertakings. 

Company registered addresses: 
1.  Schiphol Boulevard 283, Tower F, 7th floor, 1118 BH Schiphol, Netherlands. 
2. 30V, Lesi Ukrainky Boulevard, 01133, Kyiv, Ukraine. 
3. 177-a Pervomaiskaya Str., Maikop, Adygea Republic, 385000, Russia. 
4. 6 Cavendish Square, London, W1G 0PD, England. 
5. 47 Esplanade, St Helier, JE1 0BD, Jersey. 
6. 400m from Shovgenovsk-Koshekhabl motor road, a. Koshekhabl, Koshekhablsky District, Republic of Adygea, 385400, Russia. 
7. Production site of JV PPC, Sokolova Balka, Novosanjary district, Poltava region, 39352, Ukraine. 
8. 1st Floor, 22 Stasicratous Olga Court, Nicosia, Cyprus. 
9. 45/A Bulgaria Boulevard, Sofia, 1404, Bulgaria. 
10. VI. Floor, Vaci ut 33, Budapest, 1134, Hungary. 

a 

The Group also holds a 100% investment in Schevchenko farm in Ukraine. The investment was not included in the “subsidiary undertakings” list above and does not need to be 
consolidated as the Group does not have any control over the entity. The Group is not exposed to any rights to variable returns from its involvement with the farm and does not 
have any ability to affect the farm’s returns through its holding in the Farm’s Charter Capital. The interest was purchased to protect access required for oil and gas activities, 
originally recorded at immaterial cost and subsequently impaired as part of the NNC cash generating unit in prior years. 

In the opinion of the Directors the carrying value of the investments is supported by their underlying net assets of the Group’s CGU’s. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
137 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

C. Other receivables 

Current 

Prepayments  

VAT receivable 

Non-current 

Amounts owed by group undertakings 

2019  
$000 

75 

188 

263 

2019  
$000 

2018  
$000 

285 

346 

631 

2018  
$000 

47,881 

104,700 

$47.9m (2018: $104.7m) owed by subsidiary undertakings bears no interest and is due on demand. They were classified as non-current to 
reflect estimated timing of recovery.  

In accordance with IFRS 9 5.5 ‘Recognition of expected credit losses’, the Company recorded an expected credit loss in relation to the 
intercompany loans of $0.3m (2018: $35.7m) as at 31 December 2019. Movement, mainly due to the waiver of intercompany balances, 
amounted to $56.8m. 

The Company expects that the carrying value of the intercompany loan receivable may not be fully recoverable as the subsidiaries may 
not generate sufficient future profits to settle the amounts owing and accordingly, these amounts have been impaired. Amongst other 
things,  the  Company’s  expected  credit  loss  model  used  information  generated  by  the  expected  credit  losses  model  of  its  subsidiary 
undertakings  to  give  an  indication  of  the  expected  trading  cash  flows  to  be  generated  during  the  loan  recovery  period.  That  model 
includes relevant and reliable internal and external forward-looking information, incorporating economic forecasts about gas and oil 
prices and inflation. Discounting over the recovery period had no effect as an effective interest rate is 0% given the loans are due on 
demand. 

D. Taxation 

Unprovided deferred tax 

Tax losses 

Property, plant and equipment differences 

Other temporary differences 

2019  
$000 

8,545 

- 

- 

2018 
$000 

 5,820  

 - 

- 

8,545 

5,820 

Neither the deductible temporary differences nor the tax losses expire under current tax legislation. Deferred tax assets have not been 
recognised in respect of the unprovided deferred taxation items because it is not probable that future taxable profit will be available to 
utilise these deductible temporary differences. 

The standard rate of corporation tax in the UK changed from 20% to 19% with effect from 1 April 2017. The Company’s profits for this 
accounting year are taxed at an effective rate of 19.00%.The impact of the rate reduction is not expected to have a material impact on 
UK current or provided deferred taxation but is expected to reduce unprovided UK deferred tax balances in future periods. 

E. Cash and cash equivalents 

Cash and cash equivalents 

Short term deposits 

Total 

2019  
$000 

915 

7,910 

8,825 

2018  
$000 

13,272 

- 

13,272 

 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
138 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Notes to the Company financial statements 

F. Trade and other payables 

Current 

Amounts owed to group undertakings 

Trade payables 

Accruals  

Current 

Lease liabilities 

Non-current 

Lease liabilities 

Derivatives  

Maturity of financial liabilities 

31 December 2019 

Maturity of financial liabilities 

Amounts owed to group undertakings 

Trade payables 

Accruals 

Lease liabilities 

31 December 2018 

Maturity of financial liabilities 

Amounts owed to group undertakings 

Trade payables 

Accruals 

Derivatives 

2019  
$000 

2018  
$000 

14,168 

80,598 

308 

915 

527 

176 

15,391 

81,301 

139 

- 

133 

- 

- 

62 

In 1 year or 
less, or on 
demand 
$000 

In 2 - 3 years 
$000 

14,168 

308 

915 

  166 

- 

- 

- 

133 

In 1 year or less, 
or on demand 
$000 

2-5 years 
$000 

80,598 

527 

176 

- 

- 

- 

- 

62 

Non-current derivative financial instruments 
Please refer to Group Consolidated financial statements for the full disclosure on Non-current financial instruments in Note 11 and 12. 

G. Called up share capital and other reserves 

Share capital, denominated in Sterling, was as follows: 

2019  
Number 

2019  
£000 

2019  
$000 

2018  
Number 

2018  
£000 

2018  
$000 

Authorised 

Ordinary shares of 10p each 

300,000,000 

30,000 

- 

300,000,000 

30,000 

- 

Allotted, called up and fully paid 

Opening balance at 1 January 

172,125,916 

17,212 

26,666 

172,125,916 

17,212 

26,666 

Exercise of share options 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

- 

Closing balance at 31 December 

172,125,916 

17,212 

26,666 

172,125,916 

17,212 

26,666 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
139 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Of which the following are shares held in treasury: 

Treasury shares held at 1 January and 
31 December 

402,771 

40 

77 

402,771 

40 

77 

The Company purchased no treasury shares during 2019 (2018: none). There were no treasury shares used in 2018 (2017: none) to settle 
share options. There are no shares reserved for issue under options or contracts. As at 31 December 2019 the market value of the 
treasury shares held was $0.1m (2018: $0.2m).  

Other reserves 

Capital Redemption 
Reserve 
$000 

Foreign Currency 
Translation reserve 
$000 

Total 
$000 

At 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2019 

587 

 (1,090) 

(503) 

Capital redemption reserve relates to the buyback of shares in 2002, there have been no additional share buy-backs since this time. 

The foreign currency translation reserve comprises differences arising from the retranslation of the Company balance sheet from          
£ Sterling into US Dollars in 2006. 

H. Share-based payments 

Please refer to Group Consolidated financial statements for the full disclosure on share-based payments in Note 24. 

Bonus scheme 
The full details of the bonus performance criteria for senior employees and the bonus earned is explained in the Remuneration Report 
on pages 59 and 67.  

I. Auditors’ remuneration 

Audit services 

2019  
$000 

2018  
$000 

Fees payable to the Company’s auditors for the audit of the parent company 

30 

30 

J. Directors’ remuneration 

The remuneration of the Directors is disclosed in the audited section of the Remuneration Report on pages 60 to 63, which form part of 
these financial statements. 

K. Dividends 

No interim dividend was paid for 2019 (2018: nil). In respect of the full year 2019, the directors do not propose a final dividend (2018: no 
final dividend paid).  

L. Employees 

From 1 January 2019 all employee cost that were previously met by the group company JKX Services Ltd were transferred to JKX Oil & 
Gas plc. There were no employees of the Company during the year ended 31 December 2018. 

Wages and salaries 

UK social security costs 

Other pension costs 

Share based payments (equity-settled) (Note H) 

2019 
$000 

1,247 

130 

134 

14 

1,525 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
140 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

Notes to the Company financial statements 

During the year, the average monthly number of employees was: 

Management/operational 

Administration support 

M. Events after the reporting date 

See Note 33 to the consolidated financial statements. 

2019 
Number 

7 

1 

8 

 
 
 
  
 
 
141 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

General information 

Glossary 

2P reserves 

Proved plus probable  

3P reserves 

Proved, probable and possible 

P50  

AFE 

AIFR 

Bcf 

Bcm 

boe 

boepd 

bopd 

GPF 

Reserves and/or resources estimates that  
have a 50 per cent probability of being met or 
exceeded 

Authorisation For Expenditure  

All Injury Frequency Rate 

Billion cubic feet 

Billion cubic metres 

Barrel of oil equivalent 

Barrel of oil equivalent per day 

Barrel of oil per day 

Gas Processing Facility 

Hryvnia 

The lawful currency of Ukraine 

HSECQ 

KPI 

LIBOR 

LPG  

LTI  

Mbbl 

Mboe 

Mcf 

Mcm 

MMcfd 

MMbbl 

MMboe 
MMcm 

PPC 

Health, Safety, Environment, Community and 
Quality 

Key Performance Indicator 

London InterBank Offered Rate 

Liquefied Petroleum Gas 

Lost Time Injuries 

Thousand barrels 

Thousand barrels of oil equivalent 

Thousand cubic feet 

Thousand cubic metres 

Million cubic feet per day 

Million barrels 

Million barrels of oil equivalent 
Million cubic metres 

Poltava Petroleum Company 

Roubles 

The lawful currency of Russia 

RR 

sq. km 

TD 

$ 

UAH 

US 

VAT 

YGE 

Russian Roubles 

Square kilometre 

Total depth 

United States Dollars 

Ukrainian Hryvnia 

United States 

Value Added Tax 

Yuzhgazenergie LLC 

Conversion factors 6,000 standard cubic feet  
of gas = 1 boe 

Directors and advisers 

Directors 
Charles Valceschini 
Victor Gladun 
Tony Alves 
Dr. Rashid Javanshir 
Michael Bakunenko 

Company Secretary 
Julian Hicks 
6 Cavendish Square   
London  
W1G 0PD  

Registered office 
6 Cavendish Square, London W1G 0PD  
Registered in England 
Number: 3050645 

Registrars 
Equiniti 
Aspect House, Spencer Road 
Lancing, West Sussex BN99 6DA 

Independent auditors 
BDO LLP 
55 Baker Street 
Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditors  
London, W1U 7EU 

Financial advisors 
SPARK Advisory Partners Limited 
5 St. John’s Lane 
London, EC1M 4BH 

Public relations   
EM Communications 
25 Southampton Buildings  
London, WC2A 1AL 

 
 
 
 
142 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Notes 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
143 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Notes 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
144 

JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Notes 

 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
JKX Oil & Gas plc Annual Report 2019 

Designed and produced by DB&CO 
www.dbandco.co.uk, 
Printed in the UK by Pureprint Group Ltd.

The report is printed on Amadeus 50 Recycled Silk which is produced with  
50% recycled fibre from both pre and post-consumer sources, together with  
50% virgin fibre from sustainable forests independently certified according to  
the rules of the Forest Stewardship Council. All pulps used are Elemental Chlorine 
Free (ECF) and the manufacturing mill is accredited with ISO 14001 standard for 
environmental management.

JKX Oil & Gas plc

JKX Oil & Gas plc
6 Cavendish Square  
London W1G 0PD
+44 (0)20 7323 4464