Quarterlytics / Communication Services / Specialty Business Services / John Menzies plc

John Menzies plc

mnzs · LSE Communication Services
Claim this profile
Ticker mnzs
Exchange LSE
Sector Communication Services
Industry Specialty Business Services
Employees 10,000+
← All annual reports
FY2004 Annual Report · John Menzies plc
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
J

o
h
n
M
e
n
z
i
e
s

p

l
c
A
n
n
u
a
l

R
e
p
o
r
t

2
0
0
4

John Menzies plc
Annual Report 2004

LHR-0033::3377

John Menzies plc
108 Princes Street,  Edinburgh, EH2 3AA

Tel: +44 (0) 131 225 8555  Fax: +44 (0) 131 226 3752

Company No. SC34970

Email: info@johnmenziesplc.com

www.johnmenziesplc.com

 
 
 
 
 
As a group, John Menzies is now very
focused, with two complementary
businesses, Distribution and
Aviation. Both do complex things
efficiently; operate in a time critical
logistics environment; rely on people
as their core asset; use technology
effectively and are leading
players in their sectors.

John Menzies is focused on customers
who need efficient, time critical
logistics services. Our two specialist
divisions, Menzies Distribution and
Menzies Aviation, are both leaders in
their markets. Both rely on people as
their greatest asset; use leading edge
technology; and constantly strive to
deliver excellent customer service.

Contents

Chairman’s Statement

Chief Executive’s Review

Menzies Distribution

Menzies Aviation

Financial Review

Board of Directors

2

4

7

8

12

18

CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT

William Thomson

The Group has made great strides forward during the
past 12 months, as demonstrated by these results which
are significantly up on last year in all parts of the
Group’s operations.

We have carried out a rigorous evaluation of our business
and its operations from Board level down, a process 
which has played its part in the achievement of these 
solid results and is laying the foundations for the Group’s
longer term success.

Results

It gives me great pleasure to report that Group headline
profit before tax1 has increased by 64% to £33.9m. 

Menzies Distribution has seen some increase in cover 
prices in a number of product categories, and its well-
controlled operations have enabled the division to benefit
from this trend.

Menzies Aviation has continued to concentrate on getting 
its core business right, aided by greater market stability. 

The Group’s cash flow remains strong, with net cash flow2
of £17.6m. This includes an inflow of £11.75m received from
the profitable sale in August 2004 of our executive aviation
business, Execair, which had been identified as non-core 
for Menzies Aviation, and an outflow of £10m as an
additional contribution in support of our pension fund. 

Dividend

The Board has maintained dividend levels over the past four
years, through a difficult period for the Group, but reflecting
your Board’s confidence in our core businesses. These results
bring our dividend cover back to suitable levels and your
Board is therefore proposing a final dividend of 13.0p per
share, an increase of 3.2%, bringing our full year dividend
to 18.5p per share.

Strategy

Menzies Distribution is one of the country’s largest and most
efficient newspaper and magazine distribution businesses,
delivering added value to our customers through investment
in systems, process development and industry-leading
solutions. Our strategy is to focus on quality customer
service, improved operational infrastructure and innovative
processes, and we intend to ensure that Menzies remains 
the market leader and the UK’s service provider of choice 
for publisher and retailer alike.

Menzies Aviation has demonstrated its ability to deliver
shareholder value. Our strategy for this business is to invest
in growth and improved profitability based on tight capital
discipline, new contract wins and the provision of added
value market leading services for existing customers. 
The key, again, is to become the service provider of choice 
by standardising on the provision of best quality service 
at the right price.

We continue to seek suitable expansion opportunities.

1. Headline profit before tax is defined as profit on ordinary activities after
interest and before tax, goodwill amortisation and exceptional items.

2. Net cash flow is the reduction in net debt prior to the impact of currency

translation. See Note 24 c. to the Accounts.

2

Office of Fair Trading (OFT)

The OFT has announced its provisional conclusions on
newspaper and magazine distribution. We intend to work
with the industry and OFT in the further consultations 
which are planned to take place in the coming months. 

Board

As I previewed in my Statement last year, Peter Smith 
left your Board in April and Charles Ramsay in December.
They both played their full part in the development of the
Group as it now stands and we are grateful to them for 
their contribution.

Iain Robertson joined your Board in November, and his
background and experience on the board of The Royal Bank 
of Scotland Group plc will serve the Group well in the years
to come. We intend that he will take over as Chairman
of the Audit Committee after the Annual General Meeting.

Iain Callaghan will retire in September 2005, when he will
have served the Group for 40 years. He has made a huge
contribution to Menzies Distribution, which has been 
central to the Group’s success for many years. He has built 
a strong team which has placed Menzies Distribution at 
the forefront of its sector, well positioned to meet the
business needs of the future. We are already reviewing
candidates, both internal and external, to take over as
Managing Director of this division and are confident of
securing a strong successor.

Corporate Governance

We have undertaken a wide-ranging review of management
structures and performance within the Group, and your
Board has also been a part of this process. We chose to
involve external consultants for this review, in order 
to maximise the benefits from a performance evaluation 
of both the Board and its individual members, and have
undergone an extensive process of interview and
assessment, and of reviewing the outcomes.

The structure of your Board, with three independent 
non-executive directors, complies with the requirements of
the Combined Code for smaller companies (below FTSE 350).
However, we wish, over time, to move towards implementing
the requirements of the Code for larger companies, and this
review has provided a very useful input to the further
changes which may be necessary if the Board is to continue
to demonstrate its support for this aspect of the Code.

Staff

None of the improvements we are achieving would be
possible without the full support of our staff. Once again
they have demonstrated their commitment to delivering for
our customers and I would again like to record my sincere
thanks for their dedication and contribution.

Prospects

Menzies Distribution is a strong business, and we believe
we are ready for the opportunities or challenges which
may result from the OFT’s provisional conclusions. Menzies
Aviation has begun to realise its potential, and we are
increasingly confident of our ability to create shareholder
value from, and to grow, this business. 

We believe that the Group’s overall outlook is positive.

WILLIAM THOMSON
CHAIRMAN

3

CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S REVIEW

Patrick Macdonald

Summary

We have delivered a positive set of results in 2004 with 
both divisions performing more strongly than in 2003. 
Both profit and cash flow were healthy. At Menzies
Distribution, we benefited from process innovation and 
an improved product mix. At Menzies Aviation, our actions 
to address underperforming stations and raise return 
on capital in a more stable market led to significantly 
better results.

The Office of Fair Trading’s (OFT’s) announcement on 
23 February 2005, outlining potential changes to magazine
distribution arrangements, suggests both challenges and
opportunities for Menzies Distribution.

Group Highlights

£m

Turnover

Headline profit before tax 1

Profit on ordinary activities
before taxation and exceptionals

Free cash flow2

Headline earnings per share

Performance

2004

2003

Variance

1,369.2

1,297.7

33.9

30.3

26.3

44.5p

20.7

17.1

20.7

24.8p

6%

64%

77%

27%

79%

Turnover for the Group increased by 6%. At Distribution, 
sales grew by 5% due to the strong performance of
collectables and partworks, weekend newspapers and
stickers. In Aviation, turnover rose by 8%, reflecting 
volume growth across the portfolio and contract gains.

Headline profits rose by 64% with margins improving 
at both divisions. Better operating margins also reflect 
our continuing emphasis on cost control and strong 
capital disciplines.

1. Headline profit before tax is defined as profit on ordinary activities after
interest and before tax, goodwill amortisation and exceptional items.

2. Free cash flow is defined as the cash generated by the business after capital

investment, interest, tax and preference share dividends and before
acquisitions, disposals and ordinary dividends.

4

In August 2004, we sold our executive aviation handling
business, Execair, to BBA Group plc for £11.75m in cash and
realised an exceptional gain on sale of £7.6m. Execair was 
not core to the business and the proceeds from the disposal
will form part of the continuing investment programme 
in Aviation.

There were no exceptional costs during the year.

Cash flow 

Cash flow from operating activities was strong, reflecting
better trading and firm working capital management. 
Capital expenditure of £15.6m was down slightly from
£16.2m in 2003 due to a combination of tight capital
disciplines and the deferral of some expenditure into 
2005. Free cash flow of £26.3m was up 27% on last 
year (2003: £20.7m).

The sale of Execair and other smaller disposals netted
£12.6m in cash. As well as our regular pension payments, 
we made an additional contribution of £10.0m to the
Menzies Pension Fund (see People section).

Net debt at the end of 2004 stood at £43.5m compared 
to £63.3m at the end of 2003.

David Cooke, Senior Buying Manager, Tesco Stores Ltd: “Tesco are fully 
supportive of the national Sales Based Replenishment service provided 
by Menzies Distribution. We were an active participant in the trial initiative 
and have been pleased with the benefits to stores in respect of additional 
sales linked with enhanced process efficiencies. Through this excellent initiative
we are able to deliver improved availability to our customers, with in-store 
support focused on replenishment of fast selling lines.”

Our continuing commitment to customer 
service means investing in infrastructure, 
and last year saw new branches opening in
Chelmsford and Bow, bringing our distribution
network to 25 main depots and 10 satellites
across the UK.

“The Menzies interactive Training CD covers all aspects of our news and
magazine business, and is an invaluable tool for helping me address our
training needs to ensure that we provide an effective and efficient service.”
Kenny Smith, Training Coordinator, Botterills Convenience Stores.

0044::2288

5

“Pack-By-Light” automates the flow and control of the 
complex nightly newspaper packing process. It relays
information about product arrival at depot to allow optimal
allocation to staff for order packing, and tracks packing 
progress and expected order completion times to minimise
turnaround times for vehicle despatch.

0066::oooo

Our CD-based driver training programme is highly
regarded by Brian Szukala, Head of Training, Freight
Transport Association, with whom we developed the
materials: “This massive investment in developing
staff can only be commended…The investment 
is about recruiting the right calibre of employees 
and then retaining them.” 

Iain McKenzie, Business Development Director, 
Marketforce: “A key focus for all our launches is effective
communication to trade. We are delighted with the 
fantastic trade marketing plan we have agreed with
Superleague and The Launch Factory for our new title 
Pick Me Up which does this superbly.”

Our commitment to driver safety and
effectiveness resulted in a FleetSure
Award from Lothian & Borders Police
last October.

6

CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S REVIEW
(continued)

Menzies Distribution 

£m

Turnover

Operating profit
before goodwill

2004

2003

Variance

1,109.4

1,058.0

30.6

26.2

5%

17%

Menzies Distribution had an excellent year. Turnover from
newspaper sales grew by 5%, reflecting price increases 
on weekend papers and the introduction of compacts 
in the broadsheet market. Magazine sales also rose by 5%,
reflecting both the healthy market for collectables and
partworks, and launches in the weekly market, such 
as the new weekly men’s lifestyle titles Nuts and Zoo. 
Sticker sales were up 66% helped by Euro 2004 and other
football driven promotions.

Menzies Distribution remains committed to improving
customer service by investing in infrastructure and new
technology. We replaced two depots with new purpose built
branches at Chelmsford and Bow in East London. 2005 will
see further investment at Swansea and Dalgety Bay in Fife.
The roll out of “pack-by-light” technology, a real time system
for controlling the newspaper packing process which provides
better documentation for retailers, is nearing completion. 
In 2005 at our Sheffield branch we will invest in the next
generation of magazine packing systems aimed at further
customer service improvements.

Menzies Distribution remains an industry leader in innovation
and developing new services for our customers. Our trials 
of Sales Based Replenishment (SBR) in 2004 proved
successful and we have been working with major retailers
nationally since the beginning of 2005. SBR provides 
better product availability to the consumer with a lower
stockholding for the retailer and extensive trials have 
shown encouraging sales increases while reducing
waste levels.

Through “The Launch Factory” we are supporting publishers’
major launch initiatives, collaborating in their trade
marketing especially within the key independent channel.
The initial activity was developed for Nuts, with the
most recent example being Pick Me Up. The nationwide
promotions network of 4,000 independent retailers,
“Superleague”, continues its outstanding performance,
both in market share maintenance and usage by publishers,
significantly outperforming comparable trade channels.

During 2004, we developed our customer focus through 
a number of initiatives working with major retailers 
including Sainsbury’s, Tesco, Co-op, Marks & Spencer and
Boots. The innovative “Shrink Doctor”, an initiative aimed 
at helping retailers to reduce their product shrinkage levels,
shows how we can deploy our expertise to deliver bottom
line benefits to retail customers.

We have successfully concluded contract renewals 
with two key publishers, Trinity Mirror and Marketforce, 
and negotiations are progressing with a number of 
other publishers.

In February 2005, the OFT announced its provisional
conclusions on newspaper and magazine distribution. 
The statement supported the existing territory distribution
arrangements for newspapers whilst introducing the
potential for some fragmentation in magazine distribution.
We welcome the commitment to territorial distribution;
however, it is important to shape any potential change in
magazine distribution arrangements to ensure maximum
consumer benefit. We intend to play a leading role in further
consultation with the OFT and industry bodies.

7

CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S REVIEW
(continued)

Menzies Aviation 

£m

Turnover

Operating profit
before goodwill

2004

259.8

10.4

2003

239.7

2.4

Variance

8%

333%

The new management team led by Craig Smyth has 
produced a much improved result. The emphasis in 2004 
was on raising return on capital and increasing net margins
by improving underperforming stations, focusing on
customer needs across the portfolio, tightening capital
disciplines and winning new contracts. Aviation also
benefited from more stable markets and we have seen
organic growth at most stations.

We still have a number of underperforming stations.
Significant progress was achieved in Australia, Hong Kong
and UK Cargo with all three operations returning to
profitability. USA remains slightly loss making but we 
are driving through a turnaround here too, and anticipate 
a further improvement in 2005.

We have focused on delivering market leading service
levels to our customers. Our customers have noticed, and
net contract gains are significantly up on the previous year.
Key gains include FedEx, Emirates and Virgin Atlantic in
Australia; Polar Air, Singapore Airlines and Japan Airlines
at Schiphol; Jet2.com and Air Canada in the UK and British
Airways in Houston and Brazil.

Our ground handling model for low cost airlines continues
to prove its worth. This service began in late 2002 with
bmibaby at East Midlands airport. In January 2004, easyJet
outsourced the management of ground handling at their
London Luton hub and its performance has exceeded
our mutual expectations. We have recently secured contracts
to handle easyJet and flyglobespan at Edinburgh airport,
Jet2.com at Manchester airport and Pacific Blue in
New Zealand.

Markets were more stable generally, with volumes 
(i.e. excluding new and closed stations) up 16% for cargo
handling and 7% for ground handling. Cargo volumes 
were up significantly in The Netherlands, Australia, 
New Zealand and Macau. Ground handling volumes were 
up in The Netherlands, Czech Republic, Peru, St Maarten,
Australia and Macau (where volumes have recovered from
SARS). We continue to watch for any effects on our
customers of higher fuel costs.

In 2004 we launched our joint venture to provide cargo 
and ground handling at Chengdu in China. This business 
has been profitable in its first year and has performed 
ahead of our expectations.

People

Once again, the commitment, professionalism and
enthusiasm of our staff underpin our financial success. 
Two recent examples stand out. In Distribution, following
severe flooding in the Carlisle area, which resulted in
power failures, multiple road closures and the loss of our
IT systems, we were still able to get “the papers through” 
to the vast majority of customers through a determined
team effort. Associated Newspapers, a major publisher
customer, referred to our “Herculean efforts” in dealing 
with the atrocious conditions.

In Aviation in Auckland we came to the help of Team 
New Zealand, who were taking part in the America’s Cup
yachting competition. With only 6 hours’ notice, we were
able to load a backup yacht on to a specialised plane. 
With only 60mm of headroom to spare, the operation
required great delicacy and took 4 hours to complete. 
Within a few hours of arriving in Valencia, the boat was
sailing. Team New Zealand thanked Menzies for doing 
“a great job.”

8

An investment programme to rationalise our cargo
operations at London’s Heathrow Airport was completed
during the year. The newly refurbished site will enable 
us to enhance efficiencies, improve customer service still
further and will soon house our global IT centre.

Our dedication to customer service helped to secure
a contract with Virgin Atlantic to provide passenger
and ramp services at Sydney Airport for its daily
Heathrow/Hong Kong/Sydney flight. Mackenzie Grant,
Head of Asia Pacific for Virgin Atlantic, said: “Menzies
Aviation is a worldwide name in quality ground
handling services and they are no strangers to Virgin
Atlantic Airways. We chose Menzies for a variety of
reasons, including their innovative approach to training,
the company’s experience and clear commitment
to customer service.”

AMS
AMS

0099::2266

Our enhanced levels of customer
service secured a major deal to 
handle Polar Air’s cargo needs at 
its new 10,000 sq m European hub 
in Amsterdam’s Schiphol Airport. 
This follows a “Best Independent
Handler” award last year from the
Airport, for whom a spokesperson 
said: “Menzies has proven to be an
extremely flexible organisation and
achieved excellent performance 
in being able to meet the specific
demands of the low cost and 
charter markets.”

Our innovative ground handling model for the low cost
carrier market continues to deliver great customer service as
was evident by an award in October last year from bmibaby
in recognition for 100% on-time performance at East
Midlands Airport. Tony Davis, then Managing Director 
of bmibaby, commented: “As an airline we rely heavily 
on suppliers to make sure we can make a commitment 
to customers to ensure our flights depart on time…
We’re very pleased to be able to reward Menzies with 
an extended contract.”

9

We received an award last year under The Airfreight 
Industry Minimum Security Standards Scheme which 
was launched by a consortium that included the 
Metropolitan Police Service, BAA Heathrow and BA 
to establish common security standards across 
the air cargo industry.

1177::oo99

Connect2Work involves the 
24 hour operation of a fleet of
buses that transport staff to and
from Heathrow Airport from 
off-airport parking sites. With
GPS tracking we can assure our
service delivery in real time and
the airport authority is better
able to adjust schedules to
minimise queuing times during
peak hours.

Hermes, which enables users to manage and monitor real time movement of cargo within 
the supply chain, has strengthened customer ties. Phil Cimpoias, Regional Director Logistics, 
UK and Ireland, Lufthansa Cargo, said: “Our decision to extend our partnership reflects Menzies’
significant investment in IT, the new facilities at Heathrow and staff development… Hermes 
has proved to be successful in an industry that is pressured for time and, where speed of the 
supply chain is essential, all tools that assist the process are paramount.”

10

CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S REVIEW
(continued)

We made an additional contribution of £10m to the 
Menzies Pension Fund over and above our regular annual
contribution. Together these payments ensure that 
the scheme is adequately funded and demonstrate 
our commitment to our employees past and present.

Health and Safety

The Group remains committed to developing and
implementing best practice for Health and Safety
for its staff, customers and other relevant parties. 
At Menzies Distribution we have installed new transport
management systems at all branches and our approach 
to workplace transport has been accepted as an industry
“Best Practice Guide.” This has contributed to the reportable
accident rate falling significantly during 2004.

Menzies Aviation has refined its business-wide emergency
response procedures and has developed an internet-based
incident reporting system. The “safety first” message has
been reinforced with the publication of safety alerts and
regular features in our in-house magazine. The level of
aircraft accidents has fallen significantly in recent years.

Strategy

We remain committed to our 3 step strategic approach. 
In 2004, we have concentrated on step 1 “get the basics
right.” Both operating divisions have focused on delivering
great service at the right price to customers while keeping
costs lean. We are a service business, specialising in 
time-critical logistics, and this approach is fundamental 
to our success.

We are now moving on to step 2 “build strong businesses”
with both divisions developing standard operational and
financial processes which can be replicated across their
respective portfolios. We can then progress to step 3 “grow
from strength” by extending our offering in areas where 
we have expertise and developing new opportunities which
create sustainable shareholder value.

Outlook

The outlook for the Group remains encouraging. 
We expect the strong performance in 2004 to provide 
a platform for further progress in 2005. In the first 
11 weeks of 2005, trading at Group level has been 
in line with expectations. Distribution has traded 
slightly behind last year while Aviation is ahead. 
We expect capital expenditure to increase somewhat 
as we selectively invest in our core businesses.

At Menzies Distribution, contract renewals with publishers
are progressing. Although the potential effect of the OFT’s
provisional conclusions may lead to a range of outcomes, 
we believe we are ready for any changes that may arise. 
With its increased customer focus and service innovations,
the division is well placed to meet and lead development 
in the industry.

At Menzies Aviation we have seen volume growth and
greater market stability in 2004. The business has responded
well to our changed strategic focus. We are turning around
underperforming stations and are growing selectively 
our stronger performers, with a focus on customer service
and tight capital discipline. We continue to invest in
this business with the intention of creating further
shareholder value. 

I look forward to continuing our development in 2005.

PATRICK MACDONALD
CHIEF EXECUTIVE

11

FINANCIAL REVIEW

Paul Dollman

Overview

The trading results before exceptional items can be
summarised as follows:

2004

£m

2003
(restated)
£m

Change 
%

Turnover

Distribution Services

1,109.4

1,058.0

Aviation Services

259.8

239.7

Total

1,369.2

1,297.7

Operating profit

Distribution Services

Aviation Services

Total

Corporate costs

Interest

30.6

10.4

41.0

(4.2)

(2.9)

Headline profit before tax*

33.9

Headline earnings per share**

44.5p

26.2

2.4

28.6

(4.8)

(3.1)

20.7

24.8p

4.9

8.4

5.5

16.8

++

43.4

12.5

6.5

63.8

79.4

*Headline profit before tax is defined as profit on ordinary activities after
interest and before tax, goodwill amortisation and exceptional items.

**Headline earnings per share is defined as profit after tax, minority interest and
preference dividends, but before goodwill amortisation and exceptional items,
divided by the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue.

The comparative results for 2003 have been restated
following the previously announced early adoption of 
FRS 17 ‘Retirements benefits’ in full for 2004. Pension 
costs, previously shown separately, have been allocated 
to each segment based on pensionable payroll. In addition
Distribution Services have been charged a market rent for 
the use of Group freehold properties to present a more
realistic result, and carriage service charges and other
recoveries have been reclassified as turnover rather than
offset in operating costs. Note 4 to the Accounts provides 
a reconciliation to the previously reported Group results 
for 2003 in respect of FRS 17. The other restatements 
have no impact on overall Group profit.

Menzies Distribution has performed extremely well during
2004 showing an increase in operating profit before goodwill
amortisation of 16.8% to £30.6m. This is achieved partly by
sales growth of 4.9%, driven by new product launches in
the weekly market, combined with a continuing investment
programme in infrastructure and new technology resulting
in improved customer service and rigorous cost control.

Menzies Aviation has benefited from a more stable aviation
market achieving significant growth in cargo volumes. 
In addition, organic growth at a number of stations was
combined with significant improvements in net margins 
at underperforming stations. The division achieved an
increase in operating profit before goodwill amortisation
of £8m. 

Reduced corporate costs of £4.2m reflect the full year impact
of the business rationalisation programme undertaken in the
second half of 2003. Headline earnings per share increased
to 44.5p from 24.8p due to the increased operating profit,
lower interest and a lower effective tax rate of 24.5%
compared with 27.6% in 2003.

Shareholders' funds were £39.0m at December 2004
compared with a restated £15.4m at December 2003.
Principal movements were the post-exceptional profit for 
the year of £37.9m offset by taxation of £8.3m, dividends 
of £10.7m and minority interests of £0.3m combined with 
an increase in share capital of £1.8m, a net actuarial gain 
of £2.2m, realisation of own shares held amounting to £0.4m
and currency translation movements of £0.6m. The restated
£15.4m includes the prior year adjustment processed on
the adoption of FRS 17 in the amount of £62.6m.

In compliance with UITF 38 ‘Accounting for ESOP trusts’ the
investment in own shares has been reclassified from fixed
asset investments and is now shown as a deduction from
shareholders’ funds.

12

The Group generated an operating cash flow of £46.9m,
before the additional £10m pension payment noted below,
compared to £40.6m in 2003. Disposal of businesses 
and share issues raised a further £14.8m. Some £19m 
was re-invested in the business whilst dividend and tax
payments accounted for £15.3m. Net debt decreased
from £63.3m to £43.5m. 

Pensions

As previously announced, the Board adopted FRS 17 in full
for 2004 to provide investors with greater clarity of earnings
going forward. The following table summarises the profit 
and loss account and balance sheet impacts of FRS 17 
for 2003 and 2004:

The Board continues to be proactive on pensions and has
taken a number of decisions to reduce fund liabilities and
address the potential fund deficit. As indicated last year,
contributions to the pension fund were recommenced in the
second half of 2003 in the amount of £4.5m and the defined
benefit salary scheme has now been closed to new members.
During 2004 the Company contributed further cash of £16m,
including a one-off additional payment of £10m. 

For 2005 the current service cost will reduce and the net
financial return will increase as a result of the additional
payment. The cash contribution to the pension fund is
expected to be c.£5m.

Interest

2004
£m

2003 
£m

The net interest charge is analysed as follows:

Profit and Loss Account

Current service cost

(5.5)

(5.0)

Expected return on scheme assets

10.5

Interest on pension liabilities

(9.9)

9.7

(9.1)

Net financial return

Net P&L charge

Balance Sheet

Total market value of assets

Present value of scheme liabilities

Deficit in scheme

Related deferred tax asset

Net pension liabilities

0.6

(4.9)

179.3

(202.6)

(23.3)

7.0

(16.3)

0.6

(4.4)

153.5

(191.1)

(37.6)

11.3

(26.3)

Bonds

Fixed rate sterling term loan

US dollar term loan

Overdrafts / cash

Other finance income

Net interest charge

2004
£m

2003
£m

1.9

0.9

0.5

0.2

(0.6)

2.9

2.6

–

0.9

0.2

(0.6)

3.1

The bonds, which were at a fixed rate of 7.362% and
repayable between 2007 and 2009, were redeemed early. 
These were replaced by a sterling term loan at a fixed rate
of 6.23% repayable between 2005 and 2020. The overall
net benefit of the early redemption will be realised during
2005 to 2008.

13

FINANCIAL REVIEW
(continued)

Taxation

The effective Headline tax rate for the year was 24.5%
compared with 27.6% in 2003 and is analysed as:

Tax due at UK rate

Non tax-deductible items

Unrelieved overseas losses

Overseas rate impact

Utilisation of tax losses

Deferred tax asset on overseas losses

Adjustments in respect of prior years

Headline tax rate

%

30.0

0.3

3.8

0.6

(5.8)

(3.8)

(0.6) 

24.5

The tax rate on Headline earnings continues to be below 
the standard UK rate as a result of the realisation of both
carry forward overseas tax losses and the creation of a
deferred tax asset in respect of available brought forward
losses in the Netherlands.

Exceptional gains of £7.6m were not taxable. Goodwill
amortisation of £3.6m does not attract any tax relief. 
Tax paid during the year was £4.9m. Payments are expected
to increase for the 12 months to December 2005.

Acquisitions and disposals

In January the Group acquired a 74% interest in The Big
Orange Handling Company Ltd, which performs all of
easyJet’s passenger and aircraft handling at London 
Luton airport, for £0.5m.

In August the Group sold its executive aviation handling
business, Execair, to BBA Group plc, for £11.7m realising 
an exceptional gain of £7.6m. 

Goodwill

Capitalised goodwill amounts to £37.2m compared to 
£45.1m in 2003. Goodwill of £2.9m was realised on the
disposal of the Execair business.

Fixed Assets 

Purchases of fixed assets totalled:

Distribution Services

Aviation Services

Corporate

Plant &
Equip-
ment
£m

3.7

8.3

0.1

Total
£m

6.2

9.9

0.1

12.1

16.2

Property
£m

2.5

1.6

–

4.1

During the year Distribution Services continued the fit-out 
of the major new unit in East London, developed a new
freehold property in Swansea and invested some £2.5m 
in new technology.

Aviation Services capital expenditure mainly comprised
equipment to service new contracts. 

Working Capital

Working Capital movement is analysed as follows:

Stocks

Debtors

Creditors

2004
£m

1.7

(8.9)

6.9

(0.3)

2003
£m

(2.1)

4.4

6.0

8.3

Significant attention continues to be focused on managing
the Group’s working capital position, with particular
emphasis on tight control of debtors. Debtor days
outstanding at Aviation Services were 39 at December
2004 compared with 45 at December 2003. 

The net cash inflow in 2003 reflected improved debtor
collection within Aviation Services and higher trade creditors
at Distribution Services as a result of the year ending on
27 December.

14

Cash flow

Treasury operations

From a Treasury perspective the main financial risks faced 
by the Group are liquidity, interest rate fluctuations and
foreign exchange exposures. The Board has approved policies
for each of these risks, which are managed on a day-to-day
basis by Group Treasury. The purpose of these policies, which
remained unchanged throughout the year, is to ensure 
that adequate funds are available to the Group at all times
and that financial risks arising from the Group’s operating
and investment activities are carefully managed. 
Accordingly, Group policy is not to enter into transactions 
of a speculative nature. 

The Group Treasurer reports formally on a monthly basis 
to a Treasury Committee under the chairmanship of the
Group Finance Director and operates within scope and
authorisation levels specified by the Board.

Liquidity: operations are financed by a mixture of
shareholders’ funds and bank borrowings. The objective 
is to ensure a mix of funding methods offering flexibility 
and cost effectiveness to match the needs of the Group.
Surplus cash is currently held, and Group policy is to make
major deposits only with substantial institutions with high
credit ratings. In addition to its fully drawn down term loans
of £47.4m the Group has £36.2m of unutilised committed
facilities, which mature by November 2005. 

Operating Profit 

Depreciation

Goodwill amortisation

Net pension movement

Working capital

Cash spend on exceptionals

Non cash items

Operating cash flow

£m

2004

£m

33.2

16.3

1.8

(0.5)

(0.3)

(0.1)

(3.5)

46.9

2003
(restated)
£m

£m

20.2

15.8

1.8

0.5

8.3

(3.9)

(2.1)

40.6

Purchase of fixed assets

(16.2)

Sale of fixed assets

0.6

(17.0)

0.8

Net capital expenditure

(15.6)

(16.2)

Dividends from associates
and joint ventures 

Net interest paid

Preference and minority
dividends paid

Tax paid

Free cash flow

Preference shares redeemed

Loan notes redeemed

Equity dividends paid

Additional pension payment

Acquisitions

Disposals

Shares

Total movement

Opening net debt

Currency movement

Closing net debt

4.0

(4.0)

(0.1)

(4.9)

26.3

–

0.2

(10.3)

(10.0)

(3.4)

12.6

2.2

17.6

(63.3)

2.2

(43.5)

The statutory FRS 1 cash flow is shown on page 40.

3.5

(3.7)

(1.1)

(2.4)

20.7

(20.0)

0.3

(10.3)

–

(3.5)

4.6

0.4

(7.8)

(58.2)

2.7

(63.3)

15

FINANCIAL REVIEW
(continued)

Treasury operations (continued)

Interest rate fluctuations: the Group’s policy is to arrange
core debt with fixed rate borrowings. The term bank loan 
of £33m is fixed at 6.23% and is repayable between 2005
and 2020. Foreign currency bank borrowings totalling 
£21.9m are floating at rates ranging from 2.67% 
to 5.6%, which mature within the next 12 months. 
Other borrowings and cash deposits are at variable rates.

Foreign exchange exposures: the Group’s exposure 
to currency risk at a transactional level is minimal, 
with day-to-day transactions of overseas subsidiaries 
largely carried out in local currency.

The Group’s exposure to balance sheet translation risk 
in respect of its overseas net investments is minimised 
by borrowings in the functional currency of the investment
and by use of derivative financial instruments, which have
the effect of converting sterling borrowings into borrowings
of the functional currency.

Approximately 11% of Group turnover and 47% of assets are
denominated in overseas currencies. The Group does not
actively hedge exchange rate movements on the translation
of overseas profits except where those profits are effectively
matched by foreign currency interest costs.

The majority of the Aviation Services operations are located
outside the UK and operate in currencies other than sterling.
The rates of exchange to sterling for those currencies which
have principally affected the Group’s results were:

Average
for year to
Dec 2004

1.826

1.475

Year end
25 Dec
2004

1.926

1.423

Average
for year to
Dec 2003

Year end
27 Dec
2003

1.636

1.451

1.776

1.426

US$

Euro

Credit risk: the Group is exposed to credit related losses in
the event of non-performance by counterparties to financial
instruments, but does not expect any failure by them to
meet their obligations given the policy of selecting only
counterparties with high credit ratings.

Further disclosure in respect of the above is included 
in Note 16 to the Accounts.

16

International Financial Reporting Standards

The Group, along with all listed companies in the European
Union, will be required to prepare its financial statements
under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) 
and International Accounting Standards (IAS) for accounting
periods commencing in 2005. Accordingly, the Annual Report
and Accounts for the 52 week period to 25 December 2004
will be the last to contain financial statements prepared 
in accordance with UK GAAP.

The Group has been following a transition plan to migrate 
its financial reporting from UK GAAP to international
accounting. Based on the work performed to date and 
current international standards, the significant differences
that are likely to arise from the adoption of international
accounting are as follows:

Share based payments: IFRS 2 requires all share based
payments, including share options and employee share
schemes, arising since November 2002, to be shown 
as an expense in the profit and loss account. This expense 
is measured at the fair value of the award and is charged
over the vesting period.

Leases: IAS 17 establishes a new methodology to 
determine whether leases are to be treated as operating
leases or finance leases. This particularly affects leases 
over land and buildings, which must be split into their
constituent parts and assessed separately. A review of the
Group’s portfolio of operating leases is being undertaken 
to determine whether the current operating lease treatment
remains appropriate under IAS 17.

Goodwill: IFRS 3 requires that on acquisition of new
businesses after March 2004 a value is attributed 
specifically to all separately identifiable intangible assets.
Such amounts are then to be amortised over the estimated
useful life of the asset. The remaining difference between
consideration paid and the fair value of net assets 
acquired is attributed to goodwill. 

Goodwill is required to be held at cost and is not to be
amortised. Instead, it is to be subject to annual impairment
tests. Any existing goodwill will be carried at the amortised
amount and will no longer be amortised.

Pensions: for defined benefit pension schemes, the
requirements of IAS 19 ‘Employee benefits’ are similar 
to those of FRS 17 under UK GAAP. The Group has fully
adopted FRS 17 for 2004. 

Dividends: IFRS requires dividends payable to be recorded 
in the period in which they are declared whereas under 
UK GAAP dividends are recorded in the period to which 
they relate.

Deferred taxes: IAS 12 requires accounting for deferred 
tax on temporary differences, which is wider in scope 
than existing UK GAAP accounting principles in relation 
to deferred taxation. As a consequence deferred tax generally
has to be provided on the difference between an assets net
book value and its capital gains base cost even where there 
is no intention to sell the asset but only to the extent to
which such difference is not covered by capital losses 
carried forward.

Financial instruments: the primary impact of the
implementation of IAS 32 and IAS 39 is anticipated 
to be the reclassification of the Group’s 9% cumulative
preference shares from non-equity share capital to 
debt and the related dividend being reclassified as 
an interest cost.

PAUL DOLLMAN
GROUP FINANCE DIRECTOR

17

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

18

William Thomson
(Notes 1,4) was appointed
Chairman in 2002. He has been 
a non-executive director since
1987, and chairs the Nominations
Committee. He is Chairman
of E G Thomson (Holdings) Ltd, 
a shipping and logistics group 
with interests in Asia, and of 
British Assets Trust plc and 
Fidelity Japanese Values plc, 
and is a non-executive director 
of Dobbies Garden Centres plc. 
Age 64.

Iain Robertson
(Notes 1,2) was appointed 
a non-executive director on 
1 November 2004. He was
appointed a director of The Royal
Bank of Scotland Group plc in 
1993, becoming non-executive 
in 2003, and retires from their
Board in April 2005. He is also
Chairman of British Empire
Securities and General Trust plc,
Cairn Capital Ltd, and BT Scotland.
He is a chartered accountant. 
Age 59.

Dermot Jenkinson
(Notes 1,2,3,4) was appointed 
to the Board in 1986 where 
he held various executive
responsibilities before assuming 
a non-executive role in 1999. 
He is co-founder and Chairman 
of beCogent Ltd, a contact centre 
and related consultancy business,
and is a director of a number of
other private companies. Age 50.

Iain Callaghan 
was appointed to the Board in 
1997 as Managing Director of
Menzies Distribution, having joined
this business in 1965. He is also 
a Trustee of the Association 
of Newspaper and Magazine
Wholesalers and a member 
of the newspaper and magazine
industry’s Joint Industry
Stakeholder Group. Age 57.

Notes 
1. Non-executive 
2. Member of Audit Committee
3. Member of Remuneration Committee
4. Member of Nominations Committee
5. Biographies relate to the directors

shown from left to right

Patrick Macdonald 
was appointed to the Board as
Chief Executive in 2003. Previously
with GE Capital as Vice President
responsible for global sourcing, 
he has also held senior positions
with The Boston Consulting Group
and Unilever. Age 42.

Paul Dollman
was appointed as Group Finance
Director in 2002. A chartered
accountant, he was previously
Finance Director for William Grant 
& Sons Ltd, and has also held senior
financial positions with Inveresk
PLC, Maddox Group plc and
Clydesdale Retail Group. Age 48.

Ian Harrison
(Notes 1,2,3) was appointed 
a non-executive director in 
1987 and is Chairman of the
Remuneration Committee. 
He is a director of Record Currency
Management Ltd, an institutional
investment management company
specialising in currency exposure
management for pension funds
worldwide. Age 48.

David Coltman
(Notes 1,3) was appointed 
a non-executive director in 2001. 
He has held various senior positions
with airlines in the UK and with
United Airlines in Chicago, and is
Chairman of Edinburgh Worldwide
Investment Trust plc. Age 62.

Michael Walker
(Notes 1,2,3,4) joined the Board 
in 1995, was appointed senior
independent non-executive director
in 2003, and is Chairman of the
Audit Committee. He is Chairman 
of solicitors Maclay Murray & Spens, 
a director of Securities Trust
of Scotland plc, and is also the
Chairman-Elect of the Board
of Lex Mundi, a leading global
association of independent
law firms. Age 52.

19

The nightly miracle that takes place: 
4million newspapers (5million on
weekends) and 3,000 magazine titles
being delivered in over 1,000 vehicles
covering more than 92,000 miles
across the UK.

2233::1155

HHKKGG

Our professionalism, enthusiasm and expertise in
providing ramp handling, cabin cleaning and aircraft
towing and push-back services continue to win
admirers. Important contract gains last year included
BA and China Airlines, both at George Bush
Intercontinental Airport in Houston, USA, and BA in
Brazil. Mal Murphy, British Airways’ Station Operations
Procurement Manager, said: “We were pleased to
recently award Menzies Aviation a long-term
agreement for three of our Latin American stations.
[It] follows good experience with Menzies elsewhere
in our network.”

Leading edge technology is used in the systematic packing of
magazines and newspapers, vehicle delivery scheduling and
also in weighing vehicles prior to departure to ensure both
safety and accurate prediction of customer delivery times,
enabling continuous improvement in our performance.

20

Financial Report

22 Directors’ Report

30

36

Report on Directors’ Remuneration

Independent Auditors’ Report  

38 Group Profit and Loss Account

39 Group and Company Balance Sheets

40 Group Cash Flow Statement

41 Notes to the Accounts

66

67

68

Five Year Summary

Shareholder Information

Principal Business Addresses

D I R E C TO R S ’   R E P O R T

Principal Activities and Results

The principal activities of the Company and its subsidiaries (“the Group”) are the wholesale distribution of newspapers and
magazines and the provision of cargo and ground handling services at airports. A review of the results and of the development
of the business is contained in the Chief Executive’s Review on pages 4 to 11. 

Directors and their Interests

The directors who served during the year are shown below. The directors as at the end of the financial year, and their
biographies, are shown on pages 18 and 19. Their interests in the ordinary shares of the Company were as follows:

W R E Thomson

P J Macdonald

P B Dollman

I M Callaghan

D J Jenkinson

I C L Harrison

M J Walker

D A Coltman

I S Robertson (appointed 1/11/04)

C A Ramsay (retired 17/12/04)

P S Smith (left 30/4/04)

Beneficial

Beneficial

Beneficial

Beneficial

Beneficial

See Note

Non-beneficial

Beneficial

See Note

Non-beneficial

Beneficial

Beneficial

Beneficial

Beneficial

Non-beneficial

Beneficial

25 Dec 2004

27 Dec 2003

4,000

8,750

3,150

4,000

6,150

3,150

10,194

10,194

2,258,360

2,258,360

2,514,885

2,514,885

3,570,360

3,570,360

2,122,832

2,122,832

2,514,885

2,514,885

32,175

1,000

15,000

20,000

n/a

n/a

n/a

82,350

1,000

7,000

n/a

1,712,600

759,286

20,501

Note: These holdings are joint beneficial interests.

In addition to the above holdings, William Thomson and Michael Walker, as directors of a subsidiary which is a trustee
of employee benefit trusts in which they have no beneficial interest, have non-beneficial interests in 415,257 shares.

There have been no subsequent changes to these interests as at 14 March 2005.

No director had any material interest in any contract, other than a service contract as set out on page 32 or as set out
in Note 27 to the Accounts on page 65, with the Company or any of its subsidiaries at any time during the year. 

22

Annual General Meeting

A separate document has been sent to all members containing the Notice of Meeting and explaining the Special Business
to be transacted at the Annual General Meeting (“AGM”) to be held on 28 April 2005 at the Caledonian Hilton Hotel, Edinburgh.

The directors who retire by rotation at the AGM are Paul Dollman and Ian Harrison who, being eligible, offer themselves for
re-election. Iain Robertson, who was appointed as a director on 1 November 2004, will also retire in accordance with the
Articles of Association and seek election. 

Paul Dollman was appointed as Group Finance Director in 2002. Ian Harrison brings particular skills relating to pension
investment and currency management, as well as representing the interests of our major shareholder. Iain Robertson’s
financial background and experience will benefit the Board, and if elected he will take over Chairmanship
of the Audit Committee following the AGM.

In addition to the above, Dermot Jenkinson and Michael Walker, who have served on the Board for more than 9 years, will
also retire as required by the Combined Code on Corporate Governance issued in 2003 (“the Code”) and offer themselves
for re-election at the AGM. 

Each of Ian Harrison, Dermot Jenkinson and Michael Walker as non-executive directors has undergone a formal performance
evaluation and the performance of each continues to be effective and to demonstrate commitment to their role, including
commitment of time for board and committee meetings and their other duties.

The Board recommends to shareholders the election of Iain Robertson and the re-election of Paul Dollman, Ian Harrison,
Dermot Jenkinson and Michael Walker.

Substantial Shareholdings

In addition to the directors’ interests, the Company has been notified of the following interests of three per cent or more
in its issued ordinary share capital as at 14 March 2005:

D C Thomson & Co. Ltd

Mr J M Menzies

Mr D F Ramsay

Mrs S J Speke

Mrs K P Slater

Dividends

Number of
Shares

4,990,000

4,189,650

2,589,878

2,039,920

1,981,552

Percentage of
Issued Capital

8.6

7.3

4.5

3.5

3.4

The directors recommend the payment of a final dividend of 13.0 pence per ordinary share, payable on 24 June to members
on the Register as at the close of business on 27 May 2005. The shares will be quoted as ex-dividend on 25 May 2005.

This final dividend, together with the interim dividend of 5.5 pence per ordinary share paid on 30 November 2004, makes
a total dividend of 18.5 pence per ordinary share for the year ended 25 December 2004.

Directors’ and Officers’ Liability Insurance

The Company maintains liability insurance for the directors and officers of the Company and its subsidiaries.

23

D I R E C TO R S ’   R E P O R T

(continued)

Corporate Governance

The Board remains committed to high standards of corporate
governance and fully supports the spirit behind Section 1
of the Code.

All Board meetings were attended by all directors with
the exception of Michael Walker and Charles Ramsay
who each attended eight meetings. 

However, due to the history of the Company and particularly
the continuing involvement of its founding family which
established a prudent and supportive ethos within the
Company from an early stage in its development, the Board
will continue to include and to benefit from the involvement
of certain non-executive directors who are not considered
to be independent under the Code. These directors are
Ian Harrison and Dermot Jenkinson, who are members
of the business’ founding families which in total hold some
40% of the ordinary share capital of the Company. Their
inclusion in the membership of the Board’s committees
is not in compliance with the Code.

The Board

The Board consists of nine directors, six of whom, including
the Chairman, are non-executive and three executive. 
The roles of the Chairman, who is non-executive, and Chief
Executive are separate and clearly defined. Non-executive
directors are appointed for an initial term of three years,
and all directors are required under the Articles to retire and
offer themselves for re-election at least every three years.

Michael Walker is the Senior Independent Director, and
is available to address any concerns a shareholder may
have which have not been resolved through the normal
communication channels. Although he entered his tenth
year of service on the Board in November 2004, the Board
has determined that he is independent for the purposes of
the Code and that his partnership in Maclay Murray & Spens,
who are lawyers to the Company, and of whom he is
Chairman, does not constitute a material business
relationship. He brings to the Board a breadth and depth
of commercial skills, knowledge, experience and contacts
and the objectivity in both counsel and judgement that
is required of a senior independent non-executive director.
The Board has also determined that David Coltman and
Iain Robertson are independent for the purposes of the Code.

The Board met nine times during the year, with a formal
schedule of matters specifically reserved to it for decision.
These include strategic plans, the approval of financial
statements, acquisitions and disposals, major non-recurring
projects and major capital expenditures. It also delegates
specific responsibilities with written terms of reference
to the Board Committees detailed below. 

Information of an appropriate quality is issued in a timely
manner to assist the Board in performing its duties.

New directors receive appropriate induction and training.
All members of the Board have access to the advice
and services of the Company Secretary and may take
independent professional advice as appropriate at the
expense of the Company. 

At least one meeting of the Board each year is held at an
operating division’s offices, and directors are encouraged
to visit both divisional operations at other times, and to
undertake such activities and training as is appropriate or
may be required or desirable in order to carry out their duties.

The non-executive directors held two meetings during 2004,
one of which was held without the Chairman at which his
performance was reviewed.

The Board considers that it has complied with the relevant
provisions of the Code throughout 2004 except for the
disclosures made above.

Board Performance Evaluation

The Board supports the principles and provisions of the Code
which cover Board effectiveness and evaluation. A rigorous
process of performance evaluation of the whole Board and
of individual members was undertaken during the year
with the assistance of The Change Partnership (part of the
Whitehead Mann Group), who attended a meeting of the
Board and of the Audit Committee. As part of the process,
each director and the Company Secretary was interviewed,
as were representatives from the internal and external
auditors. The interview findings were compiled in a detailed
report produced for the Chairman, and a summary of those
findings was presented at a special meeting of the Board
in January 2005. The recommendations of the report were
debated and generally adopted by the Board. The Chairman
has since held separate meetings with each member of the
Board for ongoing evaluation purposes.

Communication with Shareholders

The Board has developed a comprehensive programme to
ensure that effective communication with shareholders,
analysts and the financial press is maintained throughout
the year. Through its annual and interim reports, results
and other announcements, as well as through presentations
to institutional shareholders and the dissemination
of information via the Group’s website at
www.johnmenziesplc.com, the Board seeks to present
its strategy and performance in an objective and
balanced manner. 

24

Shareholders attending the AGM are invited to ask questions
during the meeting and also to meet the directors after the
formal business of the meeting has concluded. The Chairmen
of the Audit and Remuneration Committees are also available
to answer questions from any shareholder at the meeting.
Full details of proxy votes cast on each resolution are made
available to shareholders at the meeting.

The Board receives reports at each of its meetings on
any meetings held with shareholders or analysts, and the
Chairman and Senior Independent Director are also available
for contact by shareholders at any time. As part of its review
of remuneration policy and practice during the year, the
Chairman of the Remuneration Committee contacted all
major shareholders before finalising the conclusions of
this review.

Board Committees

The Board has established four committees with defined
terms of reference. Following the AGM, the membership
of the Audit and Remuneration Committees will be reduced
to three directors (who are all non-executives) as part of the
Board’s policy regularly to refresh committee membership.
The memberships of the various Board Committees are
shown below and on pages 18 and 19.

Group Executive Committee

The Group Executive Committee is chaired by the Chief
Executive and consists of the executive directors together
with certain senior executives. It is responsible for the
implementation of strategy and plays a central role
in planning, budgeting and in risk identification and
management within the Group’s operations. It normally
meets ten times a year.

The members of the Committee are Patrick Macdonald,
Paul Dollman and Iain Callaghan, together with Craig Smyth
(Managing Director, Menzies Aviation), Robin Peters (Director
of Business Development), Susan O’Donnell (Director
of Human Resources), Alastair Couper (Group Financial
Controller) and Adair Anderson (Company Secretary).

Nominations Committee

The Nominations Committee has terms of reference
modelled closely on those set out in the Code, and its
responsibilities include recommending new Board
appointments and succession planning. It met five times
during the year, with the Chairman being unable to attend
one meeting. The Chief Executive normally attends
each meeting. 

The Board as a whole is responsible for making new
appointments to the Board on the recommendation of the
Nominations Committee and for nominating recommended
candidates for election by shareholders on first appointment
and thereafter for re-election at relevant intervals.

The members of the Committee are William Thomson
(Chairman), Michael Walker and Dermot Jenkinson.

Remuneration Committee

The Report on Directors’ Remuneration on pages 30 to 35
details the constitution and role of the Remuneration
Committee, and how the principles of the Code relating
to directors’ remuneration have been applied. The committee
is chaired by Ian Harrison and met eight times during the
year, including additional meetings arising from a change to
its advisors and the adoption of new remuneration packages,
with Michael Walker unable to attend one meeting
and Charles Ramsay three meetings.

Following the AGM, the members of this committee will be
Ian Harrison (Chairman), Michael Walker and David Coltman.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee assists the Board in the execution
of its responsibilities for corporate governance and internal
control, and has adopted terms of reference modelled closely
on those set out in the Code. It met four times during the
year, with Ian Harrison and Charles Ramsay unable to attend
one meeting each, and Dermot Jenkinson two meetings. 

The Committee reviews the Group’s internal control
structure, approves the outsourced internal audit (Controls
Assurance) and external audit programmes, approves the
fees for each, and reviews reports from management, from
the external Controls Assurance specialists, and from the
external auditors on their work. It monitors the effectiveness
of the Group’s Controls Assurance function, and reviews the
Group’s financial statements and proposed announcements,
together with any proposed changes in accounting policies,
prior to approval by the Board. Furthermore, it keeps under
review the objectivity and independence of the external
auditors and the nature and extent of the non-audit services
which they provide. 

Following the AGM, the members of this committee
will be Iain Robertson (Chairman), Ian Harrison, and
Dermot Jenkinson.

25

D I R E C TO R S ’   R E P O R T

(continued)

Directors’ Responsibilities

The directors are required by law to prepare financial
statements for each financial year which give a true and fair
view of the state of affairs of the Company and the Group as
at the end of the financial year and of the profit or loss and
cash flows of the Group for the financial year then ended.

In preparing the financial statements the directors are
required to:

• maintain adequate accounting records;

• apply suitable accounting policies in a consistent manner

and make reasonable and prudent judgements and
estimates where necessary;

• comply with the provisions of the Companies Act 1985

and all applicable accounting standards;

• prepare the financial statements on a going concern basis.

The directors are satisfied, after making appropriate
enquiries, that the Group has adequate resources to continue
in business for the foreseeable future and, accordingly,
consider that it is appropriate to adopt the going concern
basis in preparing the financial statements.

The directors confirm that they have complied with the
above requirements in preparing the financial statements.
The directors are also responsible for safeguarding the
assets of the Company and the Group and hence for taking
reasonable steps for the prevention of fraud and other
irregularities.

Internal Control

The directors are responsible for the Group’s system
of internal control, which covers financial, operational
and compliance controls together with risk management.
Whilst no system can provide absolute guarantee and
protection against material loss, the system is designed to
give the directors reasonable assurance that problems can be
identified promptly and remedial action taken as appropriate.
The directors have reviewed the effectiveness of the system
of internal control for the accounting period under review.

The key features of the Group’s internal control system are:

Control Environment

A key factor in the Group’s approach to internal control
is the recognition of the need for risk awareness and the
ownership of risk management by executives at all levels.
Each operating division has its own board. 

26

A Statement of Group Policies and Procedures sets out
the responsibilities of these divisional boards, including
authority levels, reporting disciplines and responsibility
for risk management and internal control. Certain activities,
including treasury, taxation, insurance, pension and legal
matters are controlled centrally with reports reviewed by
the Board as appropriate. 

Risk Identification and Review

Key identified risks are reviewed by the Board as well as
at operating divisional board level on an ongoing basis,
with a formal annual review of risks and controls taking
place, supported by the Group’s Controls Assurance provider.
The Group Executive Committee also reviews each division’s
performance, strategy and risk management. Annual
compliance statements on internal control are certified by
each divisional board. A Treasury Review Committee meets
regularly to review the adequacy of the Group’s facilities
against potential utilisation and commitments.

Financial Reporting

There is a comprehensive Group-wide system of financial
reporting. Figures reported include profit, cash flows,
capital expenditure, balance sheet and relevant performance
indicators. Each operating division prepares an annual
budget which is approved by the Board. Thereafter a formal
re-forecasting exercise is undertaken at least twice during
the year. Actual monthly results are monitored against
budget, forecasts and the previous year’s results. Any
significant variances are investigated and acted upon
as appropriate.

Investment Appraisal

There are clearly defined investment guidelines for capital
expenditure. All such expenditure is subject to formal
authorisation procedures, with major proposals being
considered by the Board. Post investment appraisals are
conducted for all material capital projects.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee considers reports from management,
the Controls Assurance provider and the external auditors,
and makes its recommendations to the Board, prior to the
approval of the Annual Report. 

Auditors

A resolution to re-appoint PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
as auditors to the Company and authorising the Board
to set their remuneration will be proposed at the AGM.

Corporate Social Responsibility 

Employees

Corporate Social Responsibility (“CSR”) factors play an
increasing role in the attitudes of investors, government
and customers towards businesses. Indeed, a considered
approach to CSR is an underlying factor in any determination
to provide quality services. The directors consider that
this overall approach is prevalent throughout the Group.
During 2002, they retained the Responsible Corporation Ltd,
independent specialists in this field, to review this so as
to help them to maintain a reasonable and balanced CSR
profile reflecting the nature of the business. Responsible
Corporation worked with the Group in 2002 to benchmark
its CSR position, to understand its key risks and to assist
it in formulating an appropriate action plan, and endorsed
the Group’s Corporate Social Responsibility report in its
2002 Annual Report. 

The Group recognises the need to pay continuing attention
to CSR, as set out below:

Summary

The Group has in place appropriate policies to cover its key
CSR risks. Its management structure and senior managers’
responsibilities naturally cover CSR factors as part of the
Group’s determination to provide quality service. 

The Group’s key CSR factors are its employee management
and its impact on the environment. The nature of its impact
on the environment, principally fuel and waste, is such
that the continuing priority given to appropriate cost
management ensures that the business and environmental
drivers work in the same direction. 

Comprehensive employment policies are backed by health
and safety management and training. On the environmental
front, the Group’s UK CO2 emissions cannot be considered
as having a high environmental impact, and the Group
has also taken a leading role in the recycling of unsold
newspapers and magazines.

The Company is quoted on the FTSE4Good Index, classified
as low impact.

The Board recognises that the Group’s success depends
on the quality and performance of its employees. 

The principles of equal opportunities are recognised through
published employment policies which are designed to
attract, retain and motivate quality staff, and to give full
consideration to the employment of disabled people.
Should an employee become disabled when working for
the Company, efforts would be made to continue their
employment, and necessary retraining would be provided. 

The Board believes in creating throughout the Group
a culture based on sound ethical practices which is open
and free from discrimination and harassment, and will
not tolerate discrimination in any form. It has adopted and
disseminated appropriate policies and procedures, including
those on whistleblowing.

Employees are encouraged to have a direct interest in
the financial performance of the Group through its savings-
related share option scheme, which is currently open to all
UK employees, of whom some 1,400 are members. Under
this scheme, options are granted over the Company’s shares
at a discount of 20% from the prevailing market price at
the time of grant to eligible employees at an aggregate value
based on savings of up to £250 per month over three years,
with savings scaled back if an invitation is oversubscribed.

Internal communications are designed to ensure that
employees throughout the Group are kept informed about
the direction and performance of their own division and
the Group as a whole. The Group magazine “The Reporter”
and Menzies Aviation’s “The MAG” have been issued on a
regular basis and the interim and final results are presented
to employees at visits to certain branches undertaken
by the management or otherwise circulated throughout
the business.

Over the past year our investment in employee training has
increased. All new staff are provided with training, which
for Menzies Distribution staff is supported by interactive
CD-based training. The Group recognises the importance
of management development in securing the future of the
business, and is developing new initiatives to provide advice,
support and training to divisional management. 

27

D I R E C TO R S ’   R E P O R T

(continued)

Health and Safety

Environment

The key environmental impacts of the Group are through
energy usage, principally fuel, with Menzies Distribution
being the main user in the Group, and waste from returned
unsold copies of newspapers and magazines specific
to Menzies Distribution.

CO2 emissions

Estimates of CO2 emissions by the Responsible Corporation
Ltd indicated that the Group’s operations cannot be
considered as having a high environmental impact. Other
environmental impacts within the Group are low due to the
nature of the business. As the normal budgetary controls and
business efficiency targets act to constrain and progressively
improve the environmental impact of the Company’s
operations, there is no added value in maintaining derived
CO2 emissions targets. 

Fuel

The need to reduce fuel costs, with consequential benefits to
CO2 emissions, is addressed by optimising delivery schedules
in order to keep costs down to a minimum. Delivery schedule
optimisation is a key business driver for Menzies Aviation’s
trucking and coaching services, and particularly for Menzies
Distribution, whose initiatives in this area were evidenced
by the award received in 2002 from The European Institute
of Transport Management. In addition, training for our
drivers of larger vehicles, using a specially adapted training
vehicle, has shown that fuel savings of 11% can be achieved.
A recent report on the Biffaward Programme on Sustainable
Resource Use administered by the Royal Society for
Nature Conservation and Biffa Waste Management Ltd
also examined the potential use of alternative fuels such
as LPG, but concluded that it offered, on a net basis,
“little potential advantage”. 

The Group has suitable policies and systems in place for the
management of health and safety risks, which is supported
by an ongoing programme to monitor implementation and
compliance together with periodic reviews and feedback.
All employees have received appropriate training, most also
through interactive CD-based training packages developed
by the business, which new employees now use when they
join the Group where relevant. 

Both operating divisions recognise that implementation
of best practice through the alignment of current working
practices is critical. In particular Menzies Aviation, in addition
to a general drive to improve Health and Safety standards in
all stations, is extending its Behavioural Risk Improvement
schemes to its operations in all other airports in its network
during 2005. Menzies Aviation recently established a
standardised global accident reporting system designed to
enable clear definition and recording of reportable accidents
to UK standards which will enable it to focus clearly on any
improvements required. 

Menzies Distribution has significantly improved the internal
layouts of its branches to optimise workflow patterns
and to reduce the risk of accidents. This 2-year programme
has been recognised by the Freight Transport Association
(FTA), who have used our sites as role models of good
practice. A bespoke driver training package focused on
occupational road risk and legislative awareness developed
and implemented by the division has also been endorsed
by the FTA, who have used it to develop a suite of derived
products for the transport industry generally. The division’s
work in this area was recognised by an award for “Excellence
in People Development” given by The Chartered Institute
of Logistics and Transport. 

Each division has a Health and Safety Committee which
meets monthly, supported by trained managers, which
reviews statistics and how their performance, already above
their industry standards, can be improved. The Board receives
a monthly report on any significant matters, and an annual
report on health and safety covering training, statistics
and activity during the year.

By the nature of accidents, there can be no guarantee
that they will never recur. The measures taken by the Group
are intended to place emphasis on prevention and
continuing vigilance. 

28

Waste Management

Supplier Payment Policy

The Group does not operate a standard code in respect
of payments to suppliers. Each division is responsible for
agreeing the terms and conditions under which business
transactions with its suppliers are conducted, including
the terms of payment. It is Group policy that payments
to suppliers be made in accordance with the agreed terms,
provided that the supplier has performed in accordance
with all relevant terms and conditions.

At the year end, the amount owed to trade creditors by
the Group was equivalent to 31.5 days (2003: 33.0 days)
of purchases from suppliers.

Donations

Donations to various charitable, community and arts
organisations totalling £94,000 (2003: £100,000) were made
during the year. Individual employees are also encouraged
to be active members of their local communities, and this
total includes donations to causes supported by them.

It is the Company’s policy not to make political donations,
and no political donations were made during the year
(2003: nil).

By order of the Board

C A ANDERSON
SECRETARY

14 March 2005

Controls over waste for unsold newspaper and magazine
product are closely linked to the need to reduce operating
costs by matching so far as possible supply of product with
demand. By providing quality information quickly to the
publishers, and by developing sophisticated demand tracking
and industry-leading sales based replenishment systems,
Menzies Distribution continually seeks to minimise the levels
of surplus copy consistent with maintaining full availability
of product so far as possible at all times within the 21,200
retail outlets which it serves. Following detailed trials and
software development over the past two years, the division’s
system has shown that a 51% reduction in unsold copies can
be achieved for relevant titles, and its system has now been
adopted as the standard industry model. 

Waste Collection

Menzies Distribution manages the collection and
consolidation of all unsold newspapers from these 21,200
retail units for recycling. All unsold magazines, with their high
grade paper, are likewise collected, cleansed, consolidated
and delivered to recycling plants. Some 54,000 tonnes of
magazines and periodicals and 79,000 tonnes of newspapers
were recycled from Menzies Distribution customers in 2004.

Conclusion

There are thus clear business drivers which closely align
the key environmental impacts of the Group with control
of costs, whether in energy usage or in waste from
unsold product. The Group also seeks to work closely with
independent external parties in initiatives to reduce these, so
as to widen the benefits available from these developments,
achieved through the enthusiasm of its managers. To quote
from the FTA in relation to Menzies Distribution’s training
initiatives, “This massive investment in developing staff can
only be commended in an industry which regularly comes
under scrutiny and where costs regularly inhibit action.
The investment isn’t purely compliance driven but is about
recruiting the right calibre of employee and retaining
them. It’s about motivating existing employees and
developing them.”

29

R E P O R T   O N   D I R E C TO R S ’   R E M U N E R AT I O N

Remuneration Committee

Remuneration Policy

The Remuneration Committee (“the Committee”) determines
the remuneration of the Chairman and the executive
directors on behalf of the Board. It has formal Terms of
Reference set by the Board modelled on the Combined Code.
Its members are all non-executive directors as identified on
page 25 and meet under the chairmanship of Ian Harrison.
The Company Secretary is the secretary of the Committee.

The Chairman of the Committee is available to answer
questions from shareholders at the Annual General Meeting
on the decisions of the Committee.

Patrick Macdonald, Chief Executive, attends meetings
as appropriate as do Susan O’Donnell, Director of Human
Resources, and Kepler Associates, who were appointed by
the Committee during the year as advisors and have since
also been retained by the Company to provide advice relating
to the remuneration of executive management. Maclay
Murray & Spens provide legal services to the Committee.
The Committee and the Company also used Monks
Partnership during the year to provide remuneration
benchmarking services.

Members of the Committee have no personal financial
interest other than as shareholders in the matters to be
decided and no day-to-day involvement in the running
of the business of the Group.

In considering and determining suitable remuneration
packages for the executive directors the Committee has given
full consideration to the relevant best practice provisions set
out in the Combined Code.

The Group recognises that its continuing success depends on
the quality and motivation of its employees. The Group aims
to ensure that its remuneration practices are competitive,
thereby enabling it to attract, retain and motivate executives
who have the experience, skills and talents to operate
and develop its businesses to their maximum potential.
The Committee applies these principles with regard to the
executive directors, and also reviews the policies underlying
the remuneration of senior executives.

The Committee has undertaken a full review of its
remuneration policy and practices for executive directors, and
proposes significant changes which, subject as appropriate
to shareholder approval at the AGM on 28 April 2005, will
be applied in 2005. Whilst the key features of this review
are summarised below, the remaining descriptions of
remuneration within this report refer to the practices
in force as at December 2004.

Remuneration review - key features

The Committee proposes that, in future, executive director
salaries be de-linked from incentive opportunities to reduce
the focus on salary and to help rebalance the pay mix from
fixed to performance related reward. Bonuses would be
based on a targeted value, and equity awards on a number
of shares based on fair value calculations. This is intended
to increase the incentive element within the remuneration
package for upper quartile performance from 44% of
remuneration at present to 61%, and for target performance
from 29% to 32%.

Annual Bonus targets would be set at c.20% of salary, with
any award calibrated to pay target for median performance
and maximum for between upper quartile and upper decile
performance based on a range of parameters, including peer
performance. Maximum awards would be three times target. 

A Bonus Co-investment Plan would offer up to 2:1 matching
shares based on 3-year EPS growth for investment of up
to 50% of any bonus award. Matching shares would vest
pro rata for real EPS growth of 3%-8%, with no retesting. 

30

Share Options

Share options have been granted to each executive director
normally on an annual basis at a level of one times salary.
All grants are discretionary, and awards may be varied
depending on specific circumstances. Paul Dollman and
Patrick Macdonald were granted options at three times
salary during 2002 and 2003 respectively, reflecting market
conditions at the time of their recruitment, and would
normally expect to receive annual grants under this share
option scheme of one times salary. 

Prior to September 2000, share options were not subject to
any performance conditions. Given the Group’s shareholding
profile, it was considered that the interests of directors
and shareholders were already adequately aligned. 

Options granted since the adoption of the current share
option scheme in September 2000 have been subject to a
performance hurdle and lapse if this is not achieved. Options
granted in November 2000 did not meet their performance
target and lapsed in 2003. The Committee considers that any
performance hurdles should be kept simple, and should be
closely aligned to shareholder interest, and that the use of
an earnings per share ratio to determine performance meets
these combined requirements.

Options granted in April 2002 have a performance condition
which requires the Group to exceed the 3-year growth target
approved by the Board in February 2002. Options granted
subsequently are exercisable on a sliding scale if growth
in headline earnings per share exceeds RPI plus 3%-8%
per annum over three years, adjusted to normalise pension
and tax charges, as set out in the Notes to the Share Options
table below. 

A Performance Share Plan would replace the current share
option scheme, and involve annual grants of conditional
shares vesting on 3-year Total Shareholder Return (TSR)
out performance of the FTSE 250 Index. Shares would vest
pro rata between TSR performances equal to and 30%
above this index. 

A Long Term Incentive Scheme would replace the current
share option scheme for senior executives, and involve
annual grants of conditional shares vesting on 3-year EPS
growth. Shares would vest pro rata for real EPS growth of
3%-8%, with no retesting.

Dividends would accrue on all shares vesting under the
above plans, payable in cash on vesting. 

A share ownership guideline would expect executive
directors to retain 50% of any vested share incentive
awards, and to co-invest 25% of any annual bonus,
until a shareholding target is reached.

Current practices

Basic Salary and Benefits

The Group’s policy for the current and future years is that
directors’ salaries should be maintained at competitive levels
for comparable positions reflecting, where appropriate, the
international nature of its business, and that additional
reward for success be built in to the remuneration package
through incentives designed to share with directors any
increasing profitability of the Group and increased wealth
generated for shareholders. The principal benefits-in-kind
are car allowance, private medical insurance and life cover. 

Performance Related Bonuses

The executive directors participate in a bonus scheme which
is subject to the achievement of challenging Group and
individual business or personal targets designed to encourage
excellent performance. The Committee has discretion to
vary bonus payments for each executive director based
on performance. The maximum potential payment for 2004
was 50% of basic salary. Bonus payments are subject to
the approval of the Committee and are non-pensionable. 

31

R E P O R T   O N   D I R E C TO R S ’   R E M U N E R AT I O N
(continued)

Service Contracts

Non-executive Directors

Each of the executive directors has a service contract with
the Company, the dates of which are listed in the table
of remuneration below. The Group’s practice on notice
periods is that they should be for an initial period of
two years following appointment, reducing thereafter to
12 months’ notice, with any termination payment restricted
to the actual loss incurred by the director. All executive
directors who served during the year have or had service
contracts on this basis. 

The remuneration of the non-executive directors is
determined by the Board on the recommendation of
the Chief Executive on an annual basis within the limits
contained in the Articles of Association and takes account
of market rates based on independent advice as required.
The non-executive directors and the Chairman do not have
service contracts, being appointed for an initial period of three
years, subject to review thereafter, and do not participate
in any of the Group’s bonus, share or pension schemes. 

The Remuneration Committee considers that the notice
periods stated above are reasonable and in the interests
of shareholders having due regard to prevailing market
conditions and practice among companies of comparable size.

Performance Graph

The following graph compares the Company’s total
shareholder return for the five financial years to December
2004 with the equivalent performance of the FTSE 250
Index. The directors consider that, given the nature of the
businesses within the Group and the recent recovery in the
Company’s share price, which brings it close to re-admission
to the FTSE 250 Index, the most appropriate comparison
is with this index. 

250

200

150

100

50

0

Apr 2000

Apr 2001

Dec 2001

Dec 2002

Dec 2003

Dec 2004

Menzies

FTSE 250

32

The following sections of this Report have been audited.

Directors’ Emoluments

Directors’ emoluments for the year to 25 December 2004 (27 December 2003) are:

Name
(Date of service contract or appointment) (a)

Salary/fees
£’000

In lieu
of pension
£’000

Bonus
£’000

Car
allowance
£’000

Benefits
£’000

W R E Thomson (9.5.03)

P J Macdonald (25.8.02) 

P B Dollman (8.8.02) 

I M Callaghan (17.12.03)

D J Jenkinson (30.4.04)

I C L Harrison (2.5.02)

C A Ramsay (7.9.01) (d)

M J Walker (30.4.04) (e)

D A Coltman (30.4.04)

I S Robertson (1.11.04) (f)

P S Smith (1.12.99) 

D J Mackay (retired 20.5.03)

Total

107

348

241

284

26

31

26

31

45

5

71

–

–

53 (b)

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

199

117

135

–

–

–

–

–

–

43 (g)

–

–

15

13

13

–

–

–

–

–

–

4

–

–

1 

4

1

–

–

–

–

–

–

3

–

Total
December
2004
£’000

Total 
December 
2003
£’000

Other
£’000

–

56 (c)

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

107

672

375

433

26

31

26

31

45

5

103

463

244

335

24

29

24

29

44

–

232

501

228 (g)

349

–

–

2,100

2,028

Notes:
(a) For executive directors, this is the date of their service contract, and for non-executive directors, the date of appointment or latest date

of reappointment to the Board. 

(b) Provision of pension benefits under the Group’s approved pension arrangements is restricted as a consequence of the Finance Act 1989

(the ‘earnings cap’). Patrick Macdonald elected to receive a salary supplement in lieu of the balance of his pension entitlement.

(c) Relocation expenses have been paid for Patrick Macdonald totalling £125,550 covering costs incurred in his relocation to Edinburgh.

Of this total, £69,710 was paid in 2003, and the comparative figures have been restated to reflect this. 

(d) Charles Ramsay retired on 17 December 2004. 

(e) Michael Walker’s fees are paid to Maclay Murray & Spens until 31 May 2004.

(f)

Iain Robertson was appointed to the Board on 1 November 2004. 

(g) Peter Smith left the Company on 30 April 2004 and received compensation for loss of office of one year’s salary together with

an appropriate proportion of the annual bonus on the 2004 performance of Menzies Aviation. 

33

R E P O R T   O N   D I R E C TO R S ’   R E M U N E R AT I O N
(continued)

Share Options

Name

P J Macdonald

P B Dollman

I M Callaghan

P S Smith (f)

At 27
December
2003

360,577
–

2,709*

–

205,166
–

2,680*
593*
–

15,000
10,000
10,000
25,000
70,300
25,000
67,458
78,723
–

2,680*

10,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
15,000
10,000
25,000
55,891

2,680*

64,103

593*

Granted
during
year

–
97,856
–
410*

–
58,714
–
–
78*

–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
69,178
–

–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–

Exercised
during
year (a)

Market value
at date of
exercise
(pence)

At 25 
December
Lapsed 2004 or date
of leaving

during year

Exercise
price (pence)

Date 
exercisable 
from

Expiry date

–
–
–
–

–
–
–
–
–

–
10,000
–
–
–
25,000
–
–
–
–

–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–

–
–
–
–

–
–
–
–
–

–
520
–
–
–
491
–
–
–
–

–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–

–
–
–
–

–
–
–
–
–

15,000
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–

–
–
–
–
–
–
–
18,444
1,020
44,516
413

360,577(c)
97,856 (d)
2,709*
410*

205,166 (c)
58,714 (d)
2,680*
593*
78*

–
–
10,000
25,000
70,300
–

67,458 (e)
78,723 (c)
69,178 (d)
2,680*

10,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
15,000
10,000
25,000
37,447

1,660*

19,587

180*

312
418
286
388

329
418
275
286
388

653
501
520
461
492
391
331
312
418
275

596
520
461
404
492
348
391
331
275
312
286

13.5.06
7.5.07
1.12.06
1.12.07

8.11.05
7.5.07
1.11.05
1.12.06
1.12.07

25.2.97
27.2.98
1.3.99
21.2.00
7.4.01
28.1.03
10.4.05
13.5.06
7.5.07
1.11.05

16.10.98
1.3.99
21.2.00
10.10.00
7.4.01
18.2.02
28.1.03
30.4.04
30.4.04
30.4.04
30.4.04

12.5.13
6.5.14
1.6.07
1.6.08

7.11.12
6.5.14
1.5.06
1.6.07
1.6.08

24.2.04
26.2.05
28.2.06
20.2.07
6.4.08
27.1.10
9.4.12
12.5.13
6.5.14
1.5.06

30.4.05
30.4.05
30.4.05
30.4.05
30.4.05
30.4.05
30.4.05
30.4.05
30.10.04
30.4.05
30.10.04

Notes:
(*) All the above options were granted under the executive share option scheme at nil cost with the exception of those items marked *

which have been granted under the Group’s savings-related share option scheme. 

(a) The aggregate amount of gains, measured as the difference between option exercise prices and the closing market values or sale prices

as appropriate of the shares involved on the day of exercise, on options exercised by directors during the year was £130,595.

(b) The market price for shares in John Menzies plc ranged from 312.5p to 520.5p during the year and was 520.5p at 25 December 2004. 

(c) These options are exercisable on a sliding scale if growth in headline earnings per share exceeds RPI plus 3%-8% per annum in the

three years to December 2005, adjusted to normalise pension and tax charges. 

(d) These options are exercisable on a sliding scale if growth in headline earnings per share exceeds RPI plus 3%-8% per annum in the

three years to December 2006, adjusted to normalise pension and tax charges. 

(e) These options require the Group to exceed the 3-year growth target approved by the Board in February 2002, failing which the options will

lapse.

(f) Peter Smith left the Company on 30 April 2004, following which his options were reduced in number pro rata and the exercise dates

amended in accordance with the rules of the schemes involved. He subsequently exercised options over 57,034 shares with a market
value of 500p and savings-related options over 1,840 shares with a market value of 471p.

34

Pensions 

Scheme Benefits

The executive directors are members of the Menzies Pension Fund, a contributory defined benefit scheme which provides
pension on retirement at age 60 of up to two-thirds of pensionable earnings, or the ‘earnings cap’ if lower, together with
additional benefits as below. Pensionable earnings are based on salary excluding bonuses.

Unfunded Arrangement 

The pensionable salaries for Patrick Macdonald, Peter Smith and Paul Dollman are restricted as a consequence of the
‘earnings cap’. Of these directors, Patrick Macdonald has elected to receive a salary supplement in lieu of his unapproved
pension entitlement, and Paul Dollman (and Peter Smith to his date of leaving) has an unfunded pension undertaking from
the Company to provide in total the same level of pension as if the ‘earnings cap’ did not apply. This entitlement is effective
from his date of appointment as a director. 

Pension details are as follows:

Director

P J Macdonald

P B Dollman

I M Callaghan

P S Smith (d)

Increase in
accrued
pension
during year
£’000

Total accrued
pension
entitlement
at 25 Dec
2004 (a)
£’000

4

10

17

6

7

18

169

45

Age

42

48

57

59

Transfer Value (b) (c)

27 Dec
2003
£’000

Increase excl 
members’
contributions
£’000

25 Dec
2004
£’000

52

175

21

65

2,948 

2,269

930

733

26

101

665

195

Notes:
(a) The pension benefits disclosed above include unfunded benefits. Unfunded transfer values at 25 December 2004 totalled £446,000 which

includes £304,000 held on behalf of a former director (Peter Smith) to fund pension payments of £15,712 per annum.

(b) Transfer values represent the value of assets which the pension scheme (together with the Company where appropriate) would need to
transfer to another pension provider on transferring its liability in respect of the directors’ pension benefits. They do not represent sums
payable to individual directors and therefore cannot be added meaningfully to annual remuneration.

(c) Transfer values have been calculated in accordance with ‘Retirement Benefit Schemes (GN 11)’ published by the Institute of Actuaries
and the Faculty of Actuaries. This methodology determines the values attributable to the deferred pensions for younger members by
reference mainly to the UK All-Share Index and for members nearing normal retirement date mainly to the Gilts Over 15 Years Index
and the Index-linked Over 5 Years (5% inflation) Index.

(d) Peter Smith left on 30 April 2004. All information included for him is for the period to, or as at, this date. 

Annual General Meeting

This Report will be tabled for consideration by shareholders at the AGM on 28 April 2005 together with resolutions
recommending approval of each new share plan proposed, the key elements of which are noted above.

By order of the Board

C A ANDERSON
SECRETARY

14 March 2005

35

I N D E P E N D E N T   A U D I TO R S ’   R E P O R T

to the members of John Menzies plc

We have audited the financial statements which comprise
the profit and loss account, the balance sheet, the cash flow
statement, the statement of total recognised gains and
losses and the related notes. We have also audited the
disclosures required by Part 3 of Schedule 7A of the
Companies Act 1985 contained in the directors’ remuneration
report (‘the auditable part’).

Respective responsibilities of directors and auditors

The directors’ responsibilities for preparing the annual report
and the financial statements in accordance with applicable
United Kingdom law and accounting standards are set out in
the statement of directors’ responsibilities. The directors are
also responsible for preparing the directors’ remuneration
report.

Our responsibility is to audit the financial statements and
the auditable part of the directors’ remuneration report in
accordance with relevant legal and regulatory requirements
and United Kingdom Auditing Standards issued by the
Auditing Practices Board. This report, including the opinion,
has been prepared for and only for the Company’s members
as a body in accordance with Section 235 of the Companies
Act 1985 and for no other purpose. We do not, in giving
this opinion, accept or assume responsibility for any other
purpose or to any other person to whom this report is shown
or into whose hands it may come save where expressly
agreed by our prior consent in writing. 

We report to you our opinion as to whether the financial
statements give a true and fair view and whether the
financial statements and the auditable part of the directors’
remuneration report have been properly prepared in
accordance with the Companies Act 1985. We also report
to you if, in our opinion, the directors’ report is not consistent
with the financial statements, if the Company has not kept
proper accounting records, if we have not received all
the information and explanations we require for our audit,
or if information specified by law regarding directors’
remuneration and transactions is not disclosed. 

We read the other information contained in the annual
report and consider the implications for our report if we
become aware of any apparent misstatements or material
inconsistencies with the financial statements. The other
information comprises only the directors’ report, the
unaudited part of the directors’ report on remuneration,
the chairman’s statement, the chief executive’s review
and the financial review. 

We review whether the corporate governance statement
reflects the Company’s compliance with the nine provisions
of the 2003 FRC Combined Code specified for our review by
the Listing Rules of the Financial Services Authority, and we
report if it does not. We are not required to consider whether
the board’s statements on internal control cover all risks and
controls, or to form an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Company’s or Group’s corporate governance procedures or
its risk and control procedures.

36

Basis of audit opinion 

We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing
standards issued by the Auditing Practices Board. An audit
includes examination, on a test basis, of evidence relevant
to the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements
and the auditable part of the directors’ remuneration report.
It also includes an assessment of the significant estimates
and judgements made by the directors in the preparation
of the financial statements, and of whether the accounting
policies are appropriate to the Company’s circumstances,
consistently applied and adequately disclosed. 

We planned and performed our audit so as to obtain all
the information and explanations which we considered
necessary in order to provide us with sufficient evidence to
give reasonable assurance that the financial statements and
the auditable part of the directors’ remuneration report are
free from material misstatement, whether caused by fraud
or other irregularity or error. In forming our opinion we also
evaluated the overall adequacy of the presentation of
information in the financial statements. 

Opinion

In our opinion:

• the financial statements give a true and fair view of

the state of affairs of the Company and the Group at
25 December 2004 and of the profit and cash flows
of the Group for the year then ended;

• the financial statements have been properly prepared
in accordance with the Companies Act 1985; and

• those parts of the directors’ remuneration report required
by Part 3 of Schedule 7A to the Companies Act 1985 have
been properly prepared in accordance with the Companies
Act 1985.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 
Chartered Accountants and Registered Auditors 
Edinburgh
14 March 2005 

37

G R O U P   P R O F I T   A N D   LO S S   AC C O U N T

for the 52 weeks ended 25 December 2004 (52 weeks ended 27 December 2003)

Before
exceptional
items

Exceptional
items
(Note 5)

Notes

£m

£m

2004
Total

£m

Before
exceptional
items
(restated)
£m

Exceptional
items
(Note 5)

£m

2003
Total
(restated)
£m

1,297.7

(16.5)
(20.9)

1,260.3 

1,369.2

1,297.7

(15.6)
(23.0)

(16.5)
(20.9)

1,330.6

1,260.3 

– 

– 
– 

–

(1,300.8)

(1,242.3)

(15.5)

(1,257.8)

29.8

18.0 

(15.5)

2.5 

0.6
2.8

33.2

7.6

40.8

(3.5)
0.6

37.9

(8.3)

29.6

(0.3)

29.3

(10.7)

18.6

51.6p

51.2p

2004

£m

29.3
3.2
(1.0)
0.6

32.1
(62.6)

(30.5)

(0.6) 
–

(16.1)

(1.1)

(17.2)

– 
– 

(17.2)

0.4 

(16.8)

(0.4) 
2.6 

20.2 

– 

20.2 

(3.7)
0.6

17.1 

(5.7)

11.4 

24.8p 

24.8p   

(1.0)
2.6 

4.1 

(1.1)

3.0 

(3.7)
0.6

(0.1) 

(5.3)

(5.4) 

(0.1)

(5.5) 

(11.2)

(16.7)

(11.4)p

(11.3)p

2003
(restated)
£m

(5.5)
7.1
(2.0)
0.3

(0.1)
–

(0.1)

–

–
–

–

–

–

–
–

–

7.6

7.6

–
–

7.6

–

7.6

Turnover: Group and share of joint ventures 
and associates
Less share of:

Joint ventures 
Associates

Group turnover

Net operating costs

Group operating profit / (loss)

Share of operating profit / (loss) in

Joint ventures
Associates 

Total operating profit / (loss)

Gain / (loss) on disposal of businesses

Profit / (loss) on ordinary activities before interest

Net interest payable
Other finance income

Profit / (loss) on ordinary activities before taxation

Taxation

Profit / (loss) after taxation

Minority interests

Profit / (loss) for the financial year

Dividends (including non–equity)

Retained profit / (loss) for the financial year

Earnings per ordinary share
Headline
FRS 3
Headline diluted 
FRS 3 diluted

2

1,369.2

(15.6)
(23.0)

1,330.6

3

(1,300.8)

29.8

0.6
2.8

33.2

–

33.2

(3.5)
0.6

30.3

(8.3)

22.0

44.5p

44.2p

2

5

7
4

8

22

9

10

STAT E M E N T   O F   TOTA L   R E C O G N I S E D   G A I N S   A N D   LO S S E S
for the 52 weeks ended 25 December 2004 (52 weeks ended 27 December 2003)

Profit / (loss) for the financial year
Actuarial gain on defined benefit pensions
Deferred tax associated with defined benefit pensions
Currency translation

Prior year adjustment for FRS 17

Total recognised losses for the financial year

4

4

38

G R O U P   A N D   C O M PA N Y   B A L A N C E   S H E E T S

as at 25 December 2004 (27 December 2003)

Notes

£m

1.7
(0.9)
0.3

Fixed assets
Intangible assets
Tangible assets

Investments

– joint ventures

Share of gross assets
Share of gross liabilities
Shareholder loans

– associates
– other
– subsidiaries 

Total investments

Current assets
Stocks
Deferred tax asset
Debtors 
Cash at bank and in hand

Creditors: amounts falling due within one year
Bank loans and overdrafts
Other

Net current (liabilities) / assets

Total assets less current liabilities

Creditors: amounts falling due after
more than one year
Loans and other borrowings
Other

Provision for liabilities and charges
Other

Net assets excluding net pension liabilities

Net pension liabilities

Net assets including net pension liabilities

Capital and reserves
Called up share capital
Share premium account
Investment in own shares
Profit and loss account
Capital redemption reserve

Equity shareholders’ funds

Non–equity share capital

Shareholders’ funds

Equity minority interests

11
12

13

19
14
16

16
15

16
15

19

4

20
21
21
21
21

20

23

22

2004

£m

22.3
116.1

1.1
20.2
–
–

21.3

159.7

11.1
4.7
95.2
27.0

138.0

(28.4)
(162.9)

(191.3)

(53.3)

106.4

(42.0)
(0.1)

(8.5)

55.8

(16.3)

39.5

14.4
7.7
(3.3)
(2.8)
21.6

37.6

1.4

39.0

0.5

39.5

Group

Company

2003
(restated)
£m

£m

1.4 
(0.7)
0.3 

27.4 
116.3 

1.0 
23.2 
0.2 
– 

24.4 

2004

£m

–
33.4

–
–
–
–
–
–
98.8

98.8

2003

£m

– 
4.7 

– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
97.9 

97.9 

168.1 

132.2

102.6 

12.9 
1.2
90.4 
32.1 

136.6 

–
–
63.0
16.7

79.7

(27.1)
(157.1)

(12.5)
(104.4)

(184.2)

(116.9)

(47.6) 

120.5 

(37.2)

95.0

– 
– 
121.7 
5.7 

127.4 

(6.6)
(91.4)

(98.0)

29.4 

132.0 

(68.2)
(1.5)

(9.0)

41.8 

(26.3)

15.5

14.3 
6.0 
(3.7)
(24.2)
21.6 

14.0 

1.4 

15.4 

0.1 

15.5 

(41.8)
–

(62.8)
– 

–

53.2

–

53.2

14.4
7.7
–
8.1
21.6

51.8

1.4

53.2

–

53.2

– 

69.2

–

69.2 

14.3 
6.0 
–
25.9
21.6 

67.8 

1.4 

69.2 

– 

69.2 

39

The accounts were approved by the Board of Directors on 14 March 2005 and signed on its behalf by:

Patrick Macdonald, Chief Executive

Paul Dollman, Group Finance Director

G R O U P   CA S H   F LOW   STAT E M E N T

for the 52 weeks ended 25 December 2004 (52 weeks ended 27 December 2003)

Notes

24a

25

£m

2.4
(6.4)
(0.1)
–

(16.2)
0.6

(0.1)
(0.1)
(3.2)
1.1
11.5
–

2004

£m

36.9

4.0

(4.1)

(4.9)

2003
(restated)
£m

40.6 

3.5 

(4.8)

(2.4)

£m

1.9 
(5.6)
(1.0)
(0.1)

(17.0)
0.8

(15.6)

(16.2)

(1.9)
–
(1.6)
4.7 
– 
(0.1) 

9.2

(10.3)

15.2

1.1

(10.3)

11.5

30.0

41.5

(48.5) 

(7.0)

8.8

30.0

1.8
–
0.2
0.4
(17.8)

8.8

24.0

(15.4)

8.6

0.4 
(20.0) 
0.3 
–
(29.2)

Net cash inflow from operating activities

Dividends from joint ventures and associates

Returns on investments and servicing of finance

Interest received
Interest paid
Preference dividends paid
Minority interest dividends

Net cash outflow from returns on investments and servicing of finance

Tax paid

Capital expenditure and financial investment

Purchase of tangible fixed assets
Sale of tangible fixed assets

Net cash outflow from capital expenditure and financial investment

Acquisitions and disposals

Investment in joint ventures and associates
Other investments
Purchase of subsidiaries
Disposal of associates
Disposal of subsidiaries
Net cash disposed of with subsidiaries

Net cash inflow from acquisitions and disposals

Equity dividends paid

Net cash inflow before use of liquid resources and financing

Management of liquid resources
Decrease in short term deposits

Net cash inflow from management of liquid resources

Net cash inflow before financing

Financing

Proceeds from shares issued
Redemption of preference shares
Loan notes redeemed
Sale of own shares
Decrease in loans

Net cash outflow from financing

Increase / (decrease) in cash in the year

24b,c

40

N OT E S   TO T H E   AC C O U N T S

1. Accounting policies

Tangible fixed assets and depreciation

Accounting convention and presentation

The accounts have been prepared under the historical cost
convention and in accordance with applicable accounting
standards. There were no material differences between
reported profits and historical profits on ordinary activities
of the Group both before and after taxation. In accordance
with Section 230 of the Companies Act 1985 no profit and
loss account is presented for the Company. A summary of
the more significant policies, including two accounting policy
changes, which have otherwise been consistently applied,
is given below.

Tangible fixed assets are stated at cost, including acquisition
expenses, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation
is provided on a straight line basis at the following rates:

Freehold and long leasehold properties – over 50 years.

Short leasehold properties – over the remaining lease term.

Plant and equipment – over the estimated life of the asset.

Stocks

Stocks, being goods for resale and consumables, are stated at
the lower of purchase cost and net realisable value.

Changes in accounting policies

Pensions

In accordance with FRS 17 “Retirement benefits”, the
operating and financing costs of pensions are charged to the
profit and loss account in the period in which they arise and
are recognised separately. The costs of past service benefit
enhancements, settlements and curtailments are also
recognised in the period in which they arise. The difference
between actual and expected returns on assets during
the year, including changes in actuarial assumptions, are
recognised in the statement of total recognised gains and
losses. Pension costs are assessed in accordance with the
advice of qualified actuaries.

With regard to defined contribution schemes the profit and
loss charge represents contributions made.

The Group has adopted two new accounting standards
as detailed below. These adoptions represent a change in
accounting policy and the comparative figures have been
restated accordingly. 

The Group has adopted FRS 17 “Retirement benefits” in full
for 2004. In prior years, the Group has complied with the
transitional disclosure requirements of this standard. Details
of the effects of fully adopting FRS 17 are given in Note 4.

The Group has complied with UITF 38 “Accounting for
ESOP trusts”. This has resulted in the reclassification of own
shares held from investments to shareholders’ funds. 

Basis of consolidation

The consolidated accounts incorporate the accounts of the
Company and its subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates
from the effective date of acquisition or to the date of
deemed disposal. 

Turnover

Distribution Services - revenue is recognised on the invoiced
value of goods sold, excluding value added tax.

Aviation Services - cargo revenue is recognised at the point
of departure for exports and at the point that the goods are
ready for dispatch for imports. Other ramp, passenger and
aviation related services income is recognised in accordance
with when the service was performed. Turnover excludes
value added and sales taxes, charges collected on behalf
of customers and intercompany transactions.

41

N OT E S   TO T H E   AC C O U N T S
(continued)

1. Accounting policies (continued)

Foreign currencies

Deferred taxation

Deferred tax is provided in full on all timing differences
which result in an obligation at the balance sheet date to pay
more tax, or a right to pay less tax, at a future date, at rates
expected to apply when they crystallise. Timing differences
arise from the inclusion of items of income and expenditure
in taxation computations in periods different from those
in which they are included in accounts. Deferred tax is
not provided on unremitted earnings of subsidiaries, joint
ventures and associates where there is no commitment
to remit these earnings. Deferred tax assets are recognised
to the extent that it is regarded as more likely than not that
they will be recovered. Deferred tax assets and liabilities
are not discounted.

Goodwill

Goodwill, representing the excess of purchase consideration
over the fair value of net assets acquired, is capitalised and
amortised on a straight line basis over its estimated useful
life of up to 20 years. Goodwill arising on each acquisition is
reviewed separately for impairment as necessary and, where
appropriate, charged to the profit and loss account. Goodwill
arising on acquisitions prior to April 1998 (Note 21) has been
set off directly against reserves in line with the provisions
of FRS 10.

Foreign currency assets and liabilities of the Group are
translated at the rates of exchange ruling at the balance
sheet date. The trading results of overseas subsidiaries,
joint ventures and associates are translated at the average
exchange rate ruling during the year, with the exchange
difference between average rates and the rates ruling
at the balance sheet date being taken to reserves.

Any differences arising on the translation of the opening
net investment, including goodwill, in overseas subsidiaries,
joint ventures and associates, and of applicable foreign
currency loans, are dealt with as adjustments to reserves.
All other exchange differences are dealt with in the profit
and loss account.

Foreign currency contracts are accounted for as hedges and
matched with the accounting treatment of the relevant
hedged item.

Leases

Assets acquired under finance leases are capitalised in the
balance sheet and are depreciated over their useful lives
or over the lease term, whichever is shorter. The interest
element of the rental obligations is charged to the profit
and loss account as incurred.

Rental payments under operating leases are charged to the
profit and loss account on a straight line basis over applicable
lease periods.

42

2.

Segmental analysis

By class of business
Distribution Services
Aviation Services

Corporate

Goodwill amortisation

Reconciliation of net assets:
Net debt
Unallocated net liabilities

Net assets

By geographical origin
United Kingdom
Continental Europe
Americas
Rest of the World

Joint Ventures and Associates included above
Distribution Services

Joint ventures
Associates

Aviation Services
Joint ventures
Associates

Goodwill amortisation

Joint Ventures and Associates by geographical origin
United Kingdom
Continental Europe
Americas
Rest of the World

Turnover

2004

£m

2003
(restated)
£m

1,109.4
259.8

1,369.2
–

1,369.2
–

1,058.0 
239.7 

1,297.7 
–

1,297.7 
– 

1,369.2

1,297.7 

1,223.1
65.5
45.9
34.7

1,161.2 
57.8 
53.9 
24.8 

1,369.2

1,297.7 

10.2
12.6

5.4
10.4

38.6
–

38.6

22.8
0.4
5.0
10.4

38.6

11.6 
12.9 

4.9 
8.0 

37.4 
–

37.4

24.5 
0.2 
4.7 
8.0 

37.4 

Pre-exceptional
operating profit

Net assets

2004

£m

30.6
10.4

41.0
(4.2)

36.8
(3.6)

33.2

25.2
5.0
–
3.0

33.2

–
0.2

0.6
4.4

5.2
(1.8)

3.4

0.2
–
0.6
2.6

3.4

2003
(restated)
£m

26.2 
2.4 

28.6 
(4.8)_

23.8 
(3.6)

20.2 

17.8 
3.3 
(1.5)
0.6 

20.2 

–
0.2 

0.1 
3.7 

4.0 
(1.8)

2.2

0.2
(0.2) 
(0.2) 
2.4 

2.2 

2004

£m

29.4
100.3

129.7
–

129.7
–

129.7

(43.5)
(46.7)

39.5

69.1
19.0
13.1
28.5

2003
(restated)
£m

26.9
109.3

136.2
–

136.2
–

136.2

(63.3)
(57.4)

15.5

72.5
17.0
13.5
33.2

129.7

136.2

–
0.7

1.1
19.5

21.3
–

21.3

0.7
0.3
0.8
19.5

21.3

–
0.7

1.0
22.5

24.2
–

24.2

0.7
0.3
0.7
22.5

24.2

On the adoption of FRS 17, pension costs, previously shown separately, have been allocated to each segment based on pensionable payroll.
In addition, Distribution Services have been charged a market rent for the use of Group freehold properties to present a more realistic
result, and carriage service charges and other recoveries have been reclassified as turnover rather than offset in operating costs.
The 2003 comparatives have been restated on a consistent basis.

The 2003 restatements have no impact on the overall group profit other than the effect of FRS 17.

Turnover by geographical origin and destination do not materially differ.

Goodwill amortisation is attributable to Distribution Services – £0.3m (2003: £0.4m) and Aviation Services – £3.3m (2003: £3.2m).

The results of acquisitions and disposals during the year were not material.

43

N OT E S   TO   T H E   AC C O U N T S
(continued)

3.

Net operating costs

Goods for resale and consumables
Other operating charges
Employment costs (Note 4)
Goodwill amortisation (Note 11)
Depreciation (Note 12)
Exceptional operating expenses (Note 5)

Other operating charges include:

Operating leases and hire charges – plant and machinery
Rent of properties 
(Gain) / loss on disposal of fixed assets

During the year the Group (including its overseas subsidiaries) obtained the
following services from the Group’s auditors at costs as detailed below:

Statutory UK audit
Overseas audit
Overseas due diligence work

The auditors’ remuneration for the parent company was £15,000 (2003: £15,000).

4.

Employees

Wages and salaries
Social security costs

Pension charge 

The average number of full time equivalent persons employed during the year was:

Distribution Services
Aviation Services
Corporate

The numbers above include 5,052 full time equivalent persons employed outside the UK (2003: 4,924).

2004

£m

1,026.6
57.0
199.1
1.8
16.3
–

2003
(restated)
£m

984.5
53.4
186.8
1.8
15.8
15.5

1,300.8

1,257.8

7.9
21.3
(0.1)

0.3
0.2
–

2004

£m

174.8
16.9

191.7
7.4

199.1

2004
number

3,738
7,130
40

7.2
21.4
0.1

0.3 
0.2 
0.1

2003
(restated)
£m

163.2
16.2

179.4 
7.4

186.8 

2003
number

3,817
6,664 
54 

10,908

10,535 

44

4.

Employees (continued)

Pension schemes
With regard to the principal Group funded defined benefit scheme in the UK (the Menzies Pension Fund), to which the employees contribute,
the charge to the profit and loss account is assessed in accordance with independent actuarial advice from Aon Consulting (“the Actuary”)
using the projected unit method. Certain Group subsidiaries operate overseas and participate in a number of pension schemes, which
are largely of a defined contribution nature. The profit and loss charge for defined contribution schemes represents the contributions made.

The pension charge to the profit and loss account is analysed as follows:

Menzies Pension Fund
Other schemes

2004

£m

5.5
1.9

7.4

2003
(restated)
£m

5.0
2.4

7.4 

FRS 17, “Retirement benefits” has been fully adopted for 2004. The adoption of FRS 17 has required a change to the accounting treatment
of defined benefit pension arrangements, such that the Group includes the assets and liabilities of these arrangements in the Group’s balance
sheet. Current service costs, curtailment and settlement gains and losses, and net financial returns are included in the profit and loss account
in the period to which they relate. Actuarial gains and losses are recognised in the statement of total recognised gains and losses.

Prior period results have been restated as follows:

Group profit and loss account

Year to 27 December 2003 as previously stated
Reversal of SSAP 24
Adoption of FRS 17

Year to 27 December 2003 restated

Group
operating
profit
£m

Net
interest
payable
£m

Profit / (loss)
for the
year
£m

Taxation
£m

6.3
1.2
(5.0)

2.5

(3.7)
–
0.6

(3.1)

(6.2)
(0.4)
1.3

(5.3)

(3.2) 
0.8
(3.1)

(5.5)

Group balance sheet

As at 27 December 2003 as previously stated
Reversal of SSAP 24
Adoption of FRS 17
Deferred tax reclassification

As at 27 December 2003 restated

Debtors
£m

142.3
(51.9)
–
–

90.4

Deferred

Provisions
tax for liabilities
asset and charges
£m

£m

–
–
–
1.2

1.2

(23.4)
15.6
–
(1.2)

(9.0)

Net
pension
liabilities
£m

Profit
and loss
account
£m

–
–
(26.3)
–

(26.3)

38.4 
(36.3)
(26.3)
–

(24.2)

45

N OT E S   TO   T H E   AC C O U N T S
(continued)

4.

Employees (continued)

FRS 17 movements
The Actuary undertook a valuation of the Menzies Pension Fund as at 31 December 2004 (2003: 31 December) under FRS 17.

In deriving the results the Actuary used the projected unit method and the following financial assumptions:

Rate of increase in salaries
Rate of increase in pensions
Rate of increase in price inflation
Discount rate

2004
%

3.35
3.25
2.85
5.30

2003
%

3.25
3.25
2.75
5.40

2002
% 

2.75
3.25 
2.25 
5.50 

Net pension liabilities
The assets / (liabilities) in the scheme and the expected rates of return as at 31 December 2004 were as follows:

Equities
Bonds
Property
Other

Total market value of assets
Present value of scheme liabilities

Deficit in scheme
Related deferred tax asset

Net pension liabilities

Long term
rate of return

%

7.5
5.0
6.0
6.3

Long term
rate of return

%

9.5
5.8
– 
3.0

Long term
rate of return

%

8.0
5.4
– 
3.0

Value at
December
2004
£m

104.9
31.6
31.2
11.6

179.3
(202.6)

(23.3)
7.0

(16.3)

Value at
December
2003
£m

117.9 
30.9
– 
4.7 

153.5 
(191.1)

(37.6)
11.3 

(26.3)

Value at
December
2002
£m

99.6
19.7
– 
0.6

119.9
(164.7)

(44.8)
13.4

(31.4)

46

4.

Employees (continued)

FRS 17 movements

Amounts charged to profit and loss account

Current service cost
Past service costs

Total amount charged to profit and loss account

Amounts included as other finance income

Expected return on pension scheme assets
Interest on pension liabilities

Net financial return

Amounts recognised in the statement of total recognised gains and losses

Actual return less expected return on assets
Experience gains on liabilities
Impact of changes in assumptions relating to the present value of scheme liabilities

Actuarial gain

Movement in the deficit during the year

Deficit in the Fund brought forward
Current service cost
Employer contributions
Past service costs
Net financial return
Actuarial gain

Deficit in the Fund carried forward

FRS 17 five year history
The following disclosures will be built up over time as a five year history:

Difference between actual and expected 
return on scheme assets

Experience gains / (losses) on scheme liabilities

Amount recognised in statement
of total recognised gains and losses

% of scheme
assets/
liabilities

2004
£m

% of scheme
assets/
liabilities

2%

2%

2%

3.4

4.3

3.2

9%

1%

4%

2004

£m

5.5
–

5.5

£m

10.5
(9.9)

0.6

£m

3.4
4.3
(4.5)

3.2

£m

(37.6)
(5.5)
16.0
–
0.6
3.2

(23.3)

2003
£m

14.0

2.1

% of scheme
assets/
liabilities

38%

3%

2003
£m

5.0 
– 

5.0 

£m

9.7 
(9.1)

0.6 

£m

14.0
2.1
(9.0)

7.1

£m

(44.8) 
(5.0)
4.5 
– 
0.6 
7.1

(37.6)

2002
£m

(46.0)

(4.7)

7.1

33%

(54.1)

47

N OT E S   TO   T H E   AC C O U N T S
(continued)

5.

Exceptional items

Exceptional operating expenses:
Aviation Services 
Corporate

Distribution Services

Total exceptional operating expenses

Non-operating exceptional items:
Gain / (loss) on disposal of businesses

Total non-operating exceptional items

Total exceptional items

Notes

2004
£m

a
b

c

d

–
–

–
–

–

7.6

7.6

7.6

2003
£m

(14.6)
(0.9)

(15.5)
(0.6)

(16.1)

(1.1)

(1.1)

(17.2)

a Goodwill impairment required following the Board’s review of the carrying value of goodwill in the Group’s joint venture in Peru,
as a result of uncertainty in this market - £7.8m, and following an adverse change in the business and market predominantly at
Menzies World Cargo - £4.7m.

b

c

d

Costs incurred as a result of the business rationalisation programme undertaken during the previous year - £2.1m.

Costs incurred as a result of the business rationalisation programme undertaken during the previous year - £0.9m.

Provision against investment in joint venture.

2004: On 12 August the Group sold its executive aviation handling business, Execair, to BBA Group plc for a gain of £7.6m (Note 25).

2003: On 10 March the Group sold its 49% interest in Aeroporti di Roma Handling SpA for a consideration equal to net book value.

On 20 June the Group sold its Aviation Services operation in Canada at a loss of £1.1m.

6.

Directors

A detailed analysis of Directors’ remuneration, together with shareholdings and options, is provided on pages 30 to 35.

2004
£m

2003
£m

(2.4)

(2.1)

5.9

3.5

5.8 

3.7 

7.

Interest

Receivable:

Bank deposits

Payable:

Bank loans and overdrafts

Net interest payable

48

8.

Taxation

(a) Analysis of charge in year

Current tax
UK corporation tax on profits for the year
Overseas tax
Adjustments to prior years’ liabilities
Share of joint ventures
Share of associates
Net pension adjustment on adoption of FRS 17 (Note 4)

Total current tax

Deferred tax
Origination and reversal of timing differences
Adjustments to prior years’ liabilities

Pension

Total deferred tax

2004

£m

2003
(restated)
£m

6.2
1.1
–
0.2
0.7
–

8.2

3.6
(0.2)

3.4
(3.3)

0.1

5.4 
0.9 
(2.3)
0.1
0.6 
(0.9) 

3.8 

1.4 
0.1 

1.5
–

1.5 

Tax on profit on ordinary activities

8.3

5.3 

The tax charge includes a credit of nil (2003: £0.4m) in respect of exceptional items.

The tax charge for the year is lower (2003: higher) than the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK (30%). The differences are explained below:

(b) Factors affecting tax charge for the year

Profit / (loss) on ordinary activities before tax

Profit / (loss) on ordinary activities multiplied by standard rate of corporation tax in the UK (30%)
Effects of:
Permanent differences (principally goodwill amortisation and exceptional items)
Capital allowances in excess of depreciation and other timing differences
Pension payments
Utilisation of tax losses
Adjustments to prior years’ liabilities
Unrelieved overseas losses
Higher tax rates on overseas earnings

Current tax charge for year 

2004

£m

37.9

11.4

(1.1)
(0.7)
(0.9)
(2.0)
–
1.3
0.2

8.2

2003
(restated)
£m

(0.1) 

– 

6.2 
(0.4)
(1.0)
(1.4)
(2.3)
2.5 
0.2 

3.8 

49

N OT E S   TO   T H E   AC C O U N T S
(continued)

8.

Taxation (continued)

(c) Factors that may affect future tax charges

No provision has been made for deferred tax on the sale of properties where potentially taxable gains have been rolled over into replacement
assets. Such tax would become payable only if the replacement assets were sold without it being possible to claim rollover relief, or the Group’s
existing capital losses could not be utilised. The total amount unprovided for is £2.4m (2003: £1.9m). At present it is not envisaged that any tax
will become payable in the foreseeable future.

Some of the Group’s overseas operations, particularly in the Netherlands, Hong Kong, Germany and the USA, have generated tax losses
in the past, the future utilisation of which is uncertain. The Group has therefore not recognised a deferred tax asset of £18.8m (2003: £22.2m)
in respect of tax losses of overseas companies.

No deferred tax asset has been provided in respect of capital losses within the Group. There are no current and binding contracts to sell any
of the Group’s assets and no sales are anticipated in the foreseeable future. The recoverability of these losses is therefore uncertain and as
such, has not been provided in the accounts. The amount at 30% which may be recovered against future capital gains is £7.9m (2003: £9.7m).

No deferred tax is recognised on the unremitted earnings of overseas subsidiaries, joint ventures and associates. As the earnings are
continually reinvested, no tax is expected to be payable on them in the foreseeable future.

9.

Dividends

Dividends on equity shares:
Ordinary

– Interim paid, 5.5p (2003: 5.5p) per share
– Final proposed, 13.0p (2003: 12.6p) per share

Dividends on non-equity shares:
Preference shares

Dividends of £0.1m (2003: £0.1m) were waived by employee share trusts (Note 21) during the year.

2004
£m

3.1
7.5

0.1

10.7

2003
£m

3.1
7.2

0.9 

11.2 

50

10.

Earnings per share

Operating profit
add back: goodwill amortisation
Exceptional items
Interest

Profit before taxation
Taxation
Minority interests
Preference dividends

Earnings for the year

Headline
Earnings per ordinary share (pence)
Diluted earnings per ordinary share (pence)

FRS 3
Earnings per ordinary share (pence)
Diluted earnings per ordinary share (pence)

Number of ordinary shares in issue (millions)
Weighted average
Diluted weighted average

Headline

FRS 3
Post exceptional items

2004

£m

33.2
–
7.6
(2.9)

37.9
(8.3)
(0.3)
(0.1)

29.2

2003
(restated)
£m

20.2 
– 
(17.2)
(3.1)

(0.1) 
(5.3)
(0.1)
(0.9)

(6.4) 

51.6
51.2

(11.4) 
(11.3) 

2004

£m

33.2
3.6
–
(2.9)

33.9
(8.3)
(0.3)
(0.1)

25.2

44.5
44.2

2003
(restated)
£m

20.2 
3.6 
– 
(3.1)

20.7 
(5.7)
(0.1)
(0.9)

14.0 

24.8
24.8

56.619
57.032

56.359
56.399

The weighted average number of fully paid shares in issue during the year excludes those held by the employee share trusts (Note 21).
The diluted weighted average is calculated by adjusting for all outstanding share options which are potentially dilutive i.e. where the exercise
price is less than the average market price of the shares during the year.

51

Joint
ventures
£m

Associates
£m

Subsidiaries
£m

9.2 
–
–
(0.8)

8.4

9.2 
– 
–
(0.8)

8.4

–

– 

21.3
–
–
(1.5)

19.8 

3.6 
1.8
–
(0.5)

4.9

14.9

17.7 

37.2 
0.1
(3.8)
(0.6)

32.9 

9.8 
1.8
(0.9)
(0.1)

10.6

22.3

27.4 

Total
£m

67.7 
0.1 
(3.8)
(2.9) 

61.1 

22.6 
3.6 
(0.9)
(1.4)

23.9 

37.2

45.1 

N OT E S   TO   T H E   AC C O U N T S
(continued)

11.

Intangible assets – goodwill

Cost
At 27 December 2003
Acquisitions (Note 26)
Disposals (Note 25)
Currency translation

At 25 December 2004

Amortisation
At 27 December 2003
Charge for the year
Disposals (Note 25)
Currency translation

At 25 December 2004

Net book value
At 25 December 2004

At 27 December 2003

52

12.

Tangible fixed assets

Cost
At 27 December 2003
Acquisitions (Note 26)
Additions
Transfers
Disposals
Currency translation

At 25 December 2004

Depreciation
At 27 December 2003
Charge for the year
Disposals
Transfers
Currency translation

At 25 December 2004

Net book value
At 25 December 2004

At 27 December 2003

Group

Company

Freehold
£m

Long
leasehold
£m

Short 
leasehold
£m

Plant and
equipment
£m

Total
£m

Freehold
£m

Long
leasehold
£m

Short 
leasehold
£m

37.3 
–
2.4
(0.1)
(0.2)
(0.1)

39.3

4.3 
0.8
(0.2)
(0.1)
–

4.8

34.5

33.0 

0.5 
–
–
–
(0.4)
–

0.1

0.2 
–
(0.2)
–
–

–

0.1

0.3 

34.0 
–
1.7
–
–
0.4

36.1

8.5 
2.2
–
–
–

10.7

25.4

25.5

101.8 
0.6
12.3
0.1
(4.0)
(0.5)

173.6 
0.6
16.4
–
(4.6)
(0.2)

110.3

185.8

57.3
16.3
(3.7)
–
(0.2)

69.7

44.3 
13.3
(3.3)
0.1
(0.2)

54.2

56.1

57.5 

5.6 
–
29.4
–
–
–

35.0

1.1 
0.6
–
– 
–

1.7

116.1

116.3 

33.3

4.5 

0.1 
–
–
–
–
–

0.1

– 
0.1
–
–
–

0.1

–

0.1 

0.3 
–
–
–
–
–

0.3

0.2 
–
–
–
–

0.2

0.1

0.1 

Total
£m

6.0 
–
29.4
–
–
–

35.4

1.3 
0.7
–
–
–

2.0

33.4

4.7 

53

N OT E S   TO T H E   AC C O U N T S
(continued)

13.

Investments

Cost excluding goodwill
At 27 December 2003
New investments
Loan notes redeemed
Impairment provision
Share of profits after tax
Dividends received
Currency translation

At 25 December 2004

Goodwill
At 27 December 2003
Amortisation
Currency translation

At 25 December 2004

At 25 December 2004

At 27 December 2003

Group

Company

Shares
in joint
ventures
£m

Loans
to joint
ventures
£m

Shares in
associates
£m

Loans to
associates
£m

Other
£m

Total
(restated)
£m

Subsi-
diaries
£m

0.7 
–
–
–
0.4
(0.3)
–

0.8

– 
–
–

–

0.8

0.7 

0.3 
–
–
–
–
–
–

0.3

– 
–
–

– 

0.3

0.3 

5.2 
0.1
–
–
3.9
(3.7)
(0.3)

5.2

17.7
(1.8)
(1.0)

14.9

20.1

22.9

0.3
–
(0.2)
–
–
–
–

0.1

–
–
–

–

0.1

0.3 

0.2 
0.1
–
(0.3)
–
–
–

–

–
–
–

–

–

0.2 

6.7 
0.2
(0.2)
(0.3)
4.3
(4.0)
(0.3)

6.4

17.7
(1.8) 
(1.0)

14.9 

21.3

24.4 

97.9 
0.9
–
–
–
–
–

98.8

– 
–
– 

– 

98.8

97.9

The Group has complied with UITF 38 “Accounting for ESOP trusts”. As a result own shares held are now included within shareholders’ funds
(Note 21).

The Group holds the following interests in the ordinary share capital of:

Joint ventures

50% in Ogden & Talma Aviation Services of Peru SA
50% in Freshport BV, a border inspection post facility at Schiphol
33.3% in Eurobip, a border inspection post facility at London Heathrow.

Associates

29% in MASC-Ogden Aviation Services (Macau) Ltd
30% in Worldwide Magazine Distribution Ltd
20% in TC Cox and Son (Tonbridge) Ltd
32% in Great Wall Menzies International Transportation Ltd
40% in Menzies Chengdu Aviation Services Ltd.

During the year the Group subscribed £0.1m to acquire a further 3% interest in the ordinary share capital of Great Wall Menzies International
Transportation Ltd.

Loan notes in the amount of £0.2m were repaid by Worldwide Magazine Distribution Ltd.

Other 
In April 2004 the Group invested a further £0.1m in the preferred stock of Roundpoint Inc., a developer of technology for displaying news and
media product on portable digital devices, upon the achievement of specific performance targets. Subsequent performance targets were not
achieved by Roundpoint Inc. and upon a review of the business it was considered prudent to provide against the investment.

54

14.

Debtors

Trade debtors
Other debtors
Prepayments and accrued income
Amounts owed by Group companies

Group

Company

2004

£m

73.5
11.3
10.4
–

95.2

2003
(restated)
£m

69.2 
13.2 
8.0 
– 

90.4 

2004

£m

–
1.0
1.2
60.8

63.0

2003

£m

– 
1.3 
0.9 
119.5 

121.7 

The Group has adopted FRS 17 “Retirement benefits”. As a result pension assets and liabilities are now included within the new balance sheet
classification “net pension liabilities”. This has been accounted for as a prior year adjustment.

15.

Creditors

Due within one year

Trade creditors
Accruals and deferred income
Corporation tax
Other taxes and social security costs
Dividends
Unsecured loan stock (Note 16)
Amounts owed to Group companies

Due after more than one year
Accruals and deferred income

Group

Company

2004
£m

88.6
49.3
12.4
5.0
7.5
0.1
–

2003
£m

89.1 
45.5 
10.1 
5.1 
7.2 
0.1 
– 

2004
£m

–
4.6
–
–
7.5
–
92.3

162.9

157.1 

104.4

2003
£m

– 
4.0 
– 
– 
7.2 
– 
80.2 

91.4 

0.1

1.5 

–

– 

55

N OT E S   TO T H E   AC C O U N T S
(continued)

16.

Financial instruments

The objectives, policies and strategies pursued by the Group in relation to financial instruments are described within 
the Financial Review on page 12.

Group

Company

2004
£m

2003
£m

2004
£m

2003
£m

Maturity profile
Borrowings due within one year:

Bank loans and overdrafts
Unsecured loan stock (Note 15)

Total borrowings due within one year

Borrowings due after one year:

Loans repayable between one and two years 
Loans repayable between two and five years 
Loans repayable after five years 

Total borrowings due after one year

Total borrowings
Less: Cash at bank and in hand and short term deposits

Net debt 

28.4
0.1

28.5

5.9
8.9
27.2

42.0

70.5
27.0

43.5

27.1 
0.1 

27.2 

7.6 
48.4 
12.2 

68.2 

95.4 
32.1 

63.3 

12.5
–

12.5

5.8
8.8
27.2

41.8

54.3
16.7

37.6

Other than trade debtors and creditors there are no financial assets or liabilities excluded from the above analysis.

No financial assets or liabilities were held or issued for trading purposes.

Borrowing facilities
At 25 December 2004, the Group had undrawn committed facilities of £36.2m (2003: £68.2m) with the following expiry profile:

Less than one year
Between one and two years
Between two and five years

2004
£m

36.2
–
–

36.2

In addition to these undrawn committed facilities, the Group has undrawn uncommitted facilities totalling £15.4m (2003: £2.7m).

6.6 
–

6.6

6.3 
44.8 
11.7 

62.8 

69.4 
5.7 

63.7 

2003
£m

35.4 
8.9
23.9 

68.2 

56

16.

Financial instruments (continued)

Fair values and hedges
Set out below is an analysis of the fair and book value of the Group’s financial instruments as at 25 December 2004.

Primary financial instruments held or issued to finance the Group’s operations:

Short term borrowings
Medium term borrowings
Long term borrowings

Cash and deposits

Derivative financial instruments held to manage currency translation and 
transaction exposure:

Cross currency basis swaps
Foreign currency forward contracts

2004
Book
value
£m

28.5
14.8
27.2

70.5

27.0

0.3
–

0.3

2004
Fair
value
£m

28.5
15.1
28.7

72.3

27.0

0.3
0.3

0.6

2003
Book
value
£m

27.2 
56.0 
12.2 

95.4 

32.1 

1.3 
– 

1.3

2003
Fair
value
£m

27.2 
56.0 
12.2 

95.4 

32.1 

1.3 
(0.2) 

1.1

The fair values of the cross currency basis swaps and the foreign currency forward contracts were determined by reference to quoted
market prices.

The fair value of provisions, preference shares and other financial liabilities are not considered to be materially different from their book value.

Gains on hedges
Unrecognised gains and losses on instruments used for hedging, and the movements therein, are as follows:

Unrecognised losses on hedges as at 27 December 2003 
Losses arising in previous years that were recognised in the year
Gains arising in the year that were not recognised in the year

Unrecognised gains on hedges as at 25 December 2004 (expected to be recognised within one year)

£m

(0.2)
0.2
0.3

0.3

57

N OT E S   TO   T H E   AC C O U N T S
(continued)

16.

Financial instruments (continued)

Interest rate and currency risk profile of financial assets and liabilities

Financial assets and liabilities
The interest rate and currency profile of the Group’s financial assets and liabilities (excluding trade debtors and trade creditors)
at 25 December 2004 is shown below.

Currency

Sterling
Euro
US dollar
Hong Kong dollar
Other

Floating
rate
financial
assets
£m

Fixed
rate
financial
assets
£m

2004
Total
financial
assets
£m

Floating
rate
financial
assets
£m

Fixed
rate
financial
assets
£m

2003
Total
financial
assets
£m

14.4
4.8
2.4
0.4
2.1

24.1

2.9
–
–
–
–

2.9

17.3
4.8
2.4
0.4
2.1

27.0

17.6 
4.8 
6.0 
0.4 
2.3 

31.1 

1.0 
–
–
–
–

1.0 

18.6 
4.8 
6.0 
0.4 
2.3 

32.1 

The floating rate financial assets of £24.1m (2003: £31.1m) are at interest rates linked to Base rates and LIBID. The fixed rate financial
assets of £2.9m (2003: £1.0m) are a 1 month fixed deposit of £0.3m at 4.82% and a 2 month fixed deposit of £2.6m at 4.59375%
(2003: 1 month fixed deposit of £1.0m at 3.85%).

Currency

Sterling
Euro
US dollar
Hong Kong dollar

Floating
rate
financial
liabilities
£m

Fixed
rate
financial
liabilities
£m

2004
Total
financial
liabilities
£m

Floating
rate
financial
liabilities
£m

Fixed
rate
financial
liabilities
£m

2003
Total
financial
liabilities
£m

15.6
0.3
21.6
–

37.5

33.0
–
–
–

33.0

48.6
0.3
21.6
–

70.5

25.7
2.6
31.8
0.4 

60.5

34.9 
–
–
–

34.9 

60.6 
2.6 
31.8 
0.4 

95.4 

Floating rate financial liabilities of £37.5m (2003: £60.5m) comprise bank loans, overdrafts and unsecured loan stock. Interest on these
liabilities is determined by reference to short term rates linked to Base rates and LIBOR.

Fixed rate financial liabilities comprise a loan repayable between 2005 and 2020 of £33.0m (2003: £34.9m) on which interest is at a fixed rate
of 6.23% (2003: 7.362%). This loan has a weighted average maturity of 9.5 years (2003: 4.1 years).

58

17.

Operating lease commitments

Annual commitments in respect of leases which expire:

within one year
within two to five years
after five years

The Company has no operating lease commitments (2003: nil).

18.

Capital commitments

Contracted but not provided

Group

Property

Other

2004
£m

3.5
3.5
12.1

19.1

2003
£m

2.9 
7.6 
9.3 

19.8 

2004
£m

2003
£m

2.1
4.0
–

6.1

1.0 
4.9 
–

5.9 

Group

Company

2004
£m

2.6

2003
£m

0.9 

2004
£m

–

2003
£m

–

59

N OT E S   TO T H E   AC C O U N T S
(continued)

19.

Provisions for liabilities and charges

Deferred taxation
Provided:

2004

£m

2003
(restated)
£m

Accelerated capital allowances and other timing differences

(4.7)

(1.2)

Movement in year:

Profit and loss charge (Note 8)
Disposals (Note 25)

3.4
0.1

3.5

1.5
–

1.5

The Group has adopted FRS 17 “Retirement benefits”. As a result the pension related deferred tax asset is now included within the new balance
sheet classification “net pension liabilities”. This has been accounted for as a prior year adjustment.

Other – property related

At beginning of year
Provided during year
Utilised during year

At end of year

2004
£m

9.0
1.0
(1.5)

8.5

2003
£m

10.2
1.2
(2.4)

9.0

The property related provision is in respect of obligations for vacated leasehold properties where applicable sublet income may be insufficient
to meet obligations under head leases.

Contingent liabilities
There are contingent liabilities, including those in respect of disposed and acquired businesses, which are not expected to
give rise to any significant loss to the Group. In particular, the Group had a range of contractual protections in connection with the acquisition
of Ogden Ground Services from Covanta Energy Corporation in 2000. Following Covanta Energy Corporation filing a voluntary petition
for Chapter 11 reorganisation in the US, the Group waived these rights in return for a $1.7m reduction in deferred consideration payable. 

In addition, in the normal course of business, the Company has guaranteed certain trading obligations of its subsidiaries.

60

20.

Share capital

Authorised

73,056,248 Ordinary shares of 25p each
1,735,938 9% Cumulative preference shares of £1 each

Allotted, called up and fully paid

57,763,434 Ordinary shares of 25p each, fully paid (2003: 57,247,804 shares)
1,394,587 9% Cumulative preference shares of £1 each, fully paid (2003: 1,394,587 shares)

2004
£m

18.3
1.7

20.0

14.4
1.4

15.8

2003
£m

18.3 
1.7 

20.0 

14.3 
1.4 

15.7 

As a result of options being exercised, 515,630 Ordinary shares having a nominal value of £0.1m were issued during the year at a share
premium of £1.7m.

At 25 December 2004 options granted and outstanding under the Company’s executive share option schemes amounted to 1,843,031 ordinary
shares (2003: 2,607,074). These options are exercisable at varying dates up to 6 May 2014 and at prices varying from 312p to 596p per share.

21.

Reserves

At 27 December 2003
Prior year adjustment (Note 4)
Actuarial gain (net of deferred tax)
Movement during the year
Profit / (loss) for the year
Dividends
Currency translation

At 25 December 2004

Group

Company

Share
premium
account
£m

Investment
in own
shares
£m

Profit and
loss
account
£m

Capital
redemption
reserve
£m

Share
premium
account
£m

Profit and
loss
account
£m

Capital
redemption
reserve
£m

6.0
–
–
1.7
–
–
–

7.7

(3.7) 
–
–
0.4
–
–
–

(3.3)

38.4 
(62.6)
2.2
–
29.3
(10.7)
0.6

(2.8)

21.6 
–
–
–
–
–
–

21.6

6.0 
–
–
1.7
–
–
–

7.7

25.9 
–
–
–
(7.1)
(10.7)
–

8.1

21.6 
–
–
–
–
–
–

21.6

The cumulative amount of goodwill resulting from acquisitions undertaken before April 1998, which has been written off to reserves,
is £28.9m (2003: £28.9m).

Investment in own shares
The Company’s ordinary shares are held in trust for an employee share scheme. The trusts are held within and funded by loans from a Group
subsidiary and therefore the distributable profits of the Company are unaffected by the adoption of UITF 38. At 25 December 2004 the trusts
held 729,545 (2003: 859,815) ordinary 25p shares with a market value of £3,797,282 (2003: £2,729,913).

61

N OT E S   TO   T H E   AC C O U N T S
(continued)

22.

Minority interests

At beginning of year
Acquired in the year (Note 26)
Dividend
Share of profit after tax

At end of year

23.

Reconciliation of movements in shareholders’ funds

Profit / (loss) for the financial year
Dividends
New share capital issued (Note 20)
Investment in own shares (Note 21)
Preference shares redeemed 
Actuarial gain (net of deferred tax)
Currency translation 

Net increase / (decrease) in shareholders’ funds
Shareholders’ funds at beginning of year (2003: as previously stated)
Prior year adjustment - UITF 38
- FRS 17

Shareholders’ funds at end of year

The reduction in dividends results from the redemption of preference shares in June 2003.

2004
£m

0.1
0.1
–
0.3

0.5

2004
£m

29.3
(10.7)
1.8
0.4
–
2.2
0.6

23.6
15.4
–
–

39.0

2003
£m

0.1
–
(0.1) 
0.1

0.1 

2003
£m

(5.5)
(11.2)
0.4
(0.1)
(20.0)
5.1
0.3

(31.0)
115.4
(3.6)
(65.4) 

15.4 

62

24.

Cash flow

a.

Reconciliation of operating profit to net cash inflow from operating activities

Total operating profit (pre-exceptional items)
Depreciation
Goodwill amortisation
Share of operating (profit) / loss in joint ventures
Share of operating profit in associates
Cash spend on exceptional items
FRS 17 pension charge
Pension contributions in cash
Other items not involving the movement of cash
Decrease / (increase) in stocks
(Increase) / decrease in debtors
Increase in creditors

Net cash inflow from operating activities

Operating cash flows relating to acquisitions and disposals during the year were not material.

b.

Reconciliation of net cash flow to movement in net debt

Increase / (decrease) in cash in the year
Decrease in short term deposits
Decrease in debt

Movement in net debt in the year
Net debt at beginning of year

Net debt at end of year

c.

Analysis of changes in net debt

Cash at bank and in hand
Bank overdrafts

Short term deposits
Bank loans due within one year
Loan stock due within one year
Debt due after one year

2004

£m

33.2
16.3
1.8
(0.6)
(2.8)
(0.1)
5.5
(16.0)
(0.1)
1.7
(8.9)
6.9

36.9

2004
£m

8.6
(8.9)
20.1

19.8
(63.3)

(43.5)

2003
£m

Cash flows
£m

Currency
translation
£m

19.0 
(20.6)

(1.6) 
13.1 
(6.5)
(0.1)
(68.2)

(63.3)

3.8
4.8

8.6
(8.8)
(7.3)
–
25.1

17.6

–
–

–
(0.1)
1.2
–
1.1

2.2

2003
(restated)
£m

20.2 
15.8 
1.8 
0.4
(2.6)
(3.9)
5.0
(4.5)
0.1 
(2.1) 
4.4 
6.0

40.6 

2003
£m

(7.0) 
(30.2) 
32.1

(5.1)
(58.2)

(63.3)

2004
£m

22.8
(15.8)

7.0
4.2
(12.6)
(0.1)
(42.0)

(43.5)

63

N OT E S   TO   T H E   AC C O U N T S
(continued)

25.

Disposals

Net assets disposed:
Goodwill (Note 11)
Tangible fixed assets
Stocks
Debtors
Creditors
Corporation tax
Deferred taxation (Note 19)

Disposal costs
Consideration received in cash

Gain on disposal

Execair
£m

2.9
0.7
0.1
1.3
(0.9)
(0.1)
(0.1)

3.9
0.2
(11.7)

(7.6)

On 12 August 2004 the Group sold its executive aviation handling business, Execair, to BBA Group plc for £11.7m and realised a pre-tax
exceptional gain of £7.6m.

26.

Acquisitions

Net assets acquired:

Tangible fixed assets (Note 12)
Debtors
Creditors
Minority interest (Note 22)

Satisfied by:

Cash
Acquisition costs

Goodwill (Note 11)

The Big
Orange Handling
Company Ltd
£m

0.6
0.2
(0.2)
(0.1)

0.5

0.5
0.1

0.6

0.1

On 12 January 2004 Menzies Aviation plc acquired a 74% interest in The Big Orange Handling Company Limited for £0.5m in cash. The company
performs all of easyJet’s passenger and aircraft handling at London Luton Airport.

The directors consider that the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired is not materially different to their net book value.

64

27.

Related party transactions

During the year the Group transacted with related parties in the normal course of business and on an arm’s length basis. Details of these
transactions are shown below:

Related party

Ogden & Talma Aviation Services of Peru SA
Eurobip
Freshport BV
Menzies Chengdu Aviation Services Ltd

Group
share
holding
%

50
33.3
50
40

Sales to
related
party
£m

Purchases
from related
party
£m

Amounts owed
to related
party at 25
December
2004
£m

0.7
–
0.3
0.1

–
0.4
–
–

–
–
–
–

During the year the Group incurred fees for legal services amounting to £0.2m (2003: nil) to Maclay Murray & Spens, of which Mr M J Walker,
a director of the Company, is a partner.

During the year the Group purchased services to the value of £0.4m (2003: £0.2m) from beCogent Limited, of which Mr D J Jenkinson, a director
of the Company, is the co-founder and Chairman.

Mr W R E Thomson, a director of the Company, is a director of Dolphin Logistics Limited and has an interest in E G Thomson (Holdings) Limited
which owns 50% of Dolphin. On 17 January 2005 the Group sold the 50% interest which it held in Dolphin Logistics Limited for a consideration
equal to net book value. The amount was not material.

28.

Subsidiary companies

The principal subsidiaries, Menzies Distribution Limited, Menzies Group Holdings Limited, Menzies Aviation plc and Menzies Aviation Holdings
Limited are ultimately wholly owned by the Company and operate mainly in the United Kingdom. The issued share capital of these subsidiaries
is mainly in the form of equity shares.

65

FRS 17 basis

SSAP 24 basis

12 months to December

2004

£m

2003
(restated)
£m

1,086.6
244.0

1,330.6
–

1,033.5 
226.8 

1,260.3 
–

12 months
to December

8 months
to December 

12 months
to April

2002

£m

936.9
195.9 

1,132.8 
– 

2001

£m

578.8 
128.8 

707.6 
55.9 

2001

£m

844.2 
137.1 

981.3 
306.8 

1,330.6

1,260.3 

1,132.8 

763.5 

1,288.1 

30.6
10.4

41.0
(4.2)
–

36.8
(3.6)
–

33.2
7.6

40.8
(3.5)
0.6

37.9

26.2 
2.4 

28.6 
(4.8)
– 

23.8 
(3.6)
–

20.2 
(17.2)

3.0 
(3.7)
0.6

(0.1) 

28.7 
3.7

32.4 
(7.0)
3.6 

29.0 
(3.5)
–

25.5
(4.7)

20.8
(3.1)
–

17.7

16.5 
(3.8)

12.7 
(4.7)
3.3 

11.3 
(2.2)
(5.7) 

3.4 
(22.5)

(19.1) 
(2.0)
–

(21.1) 

26.3 
4.3 

30.6 
(6.9)
5.0 

28.7 
(1.7)
22.9 

49.9 
(34.8) 

15.1 
–
–

15.1 

18.5 p
44.5 p
51.6 p

18.1 p
24.8 p
(11.4) p

18.1 p
32.9 p
18.2 p

12.1 p
0.4 p
(38.7) p

18.1 p
62.8 p
2.7 p

F I V E   Y EA R   S U M M A RY

Turnover (excluding joint ventures and associates)
Distribution Services
Aviation Services

Continuing operations
Discontinued operations

Operating profit
Distribution Services
Aviation Services

Corporate
Pension credit

Continuing operations
Goodwill amortisation
Discontinued operations

Total operating profit
Exceptional items

Profit / (loss) before interest
Net interest payable
Other finance income

Profit / (loss) before taxation

Per ordinary share
Dividends
Headline earnings
FRS 3 earnings

66

S H A R E H O L D E R   I N F O R M AT I O N

Internet

Payment of Dividends

It is in the interests of shareholders and the Company for
dividends to be paid directly into bank or building society
accounts. Any shareholder who wishes to receive dividends
in this way should contact the Company’s Registrars to obtain
a dividend mandate form.

Dividends are paid as follows:

Ordinary shares

Interim
30 November 2005

9% Preference shares 

Interim
1 April 2005

Final
24 June 2005

Final
30 September 2005

The final dividend on the ordinary shares will be payable
to shareholders on the register as at 27 May 2005.

Investor Relations

For further copies of the Group’s accounts or other investor
relations enquiries, please contact:

John Menzies plc
108 Princes Street 
Edinburgh
EH2 3AA
Tel: 0131 459 8186
Fax: 0131 226 3752
Email: info@johnmenziesplc.com

The Group operates a website which can be found at
www.johnmenziesplc.com. This site is regularly updated to
provide you with information about the Group and each of
its operating divisions. In particular all of the Group’s press
releases and announcements can be found on the site
together with copies of the Group’s accounts.

Registrars

Any enquiries concerning your shareholding should be
addressed to the Company’s Registrars:

Capita IRG plc
The Registry 
34 Beckenham Road
Beckenham
Kent
BR3 4TU

Tel: 0870 162 3100
Fax: 0208 639 2487

Alternatively, you can email Iain Phillips at
iphillips@capitaregistrars.com.

The Registrar should be notified promptly of any change
in a shareholder’s address.

Share Price

The current share price of John Menzies plc ordinary shares
can be obtained from the Group’s website.

Low Cost Dealing Service

The Group has arranged a low cost dealing service for those
wishing to buy or sell shares in John Menzies plc. To use this
service please call 0845 601 0995 and quote ref: LOW C0014.

Alternatively write to:
John Menzies plc 
Share Dealing Service
Stocktrade
PO Box 1076
10 George Street
Edinburgh
EH2 2PZ

67

Principal Advisors

Auditors
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Erskine House
68-73 Queen Street
Edinburgh
EH2 4NH

Corporate Financial Advisors 
and Joint Brokers
Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein
20 Fenchurch Street
London
EC3P 3DB

Joint Brokers
Bell Lawrie White
48 St Vincent Street
Glasgow
G2 5TS

P R I N C I PA L   B U S I N E S S   A D D R E S S E S   A N D   A DV I S O R S

Principal Business Addresses

John Menzies plc
108 Princes Street
Edinburgh
EH2 3AA
Tel: +44 (0) 131 225 8555
Fax: +44 (0) 131 226 3752
Email: info@johnmenziesplc.com

Menzies Distribution
2 Lochside Avenue
Edinburgh Park
Edinburgh
EH12 9DJ
Tel: +44 (0) 131 467 8070
Fax: +44 (0) 131 469 4797

Menzies Aviation
5 The Enterprise Centre
Kelvin Lane
Crawley
West Sussex
RH10 9PT
Tel: +44 (0) 1293 583300
Fax: +44 (0) 1293 526478

From 3 May 2005:

Aviation House
Southern Perimeter Road
Heathrow Airport
Hounslow
TW6 3AE

68

As a group, John Menzies is now very
focused, with two complementary
businesses, Distribution and
Aviation. Both do complex things
efficiently; operate in a time critical
logistics environment; rely on people
as their core asset; use technology
effectively and are leading
players in their sectors.

J

o
h
n
M
e
n
z
i
e
s

p

l
c
A
n
n
u
a
l

R
e
p
o
r
t

2
0
0
4

John Menzies plc
Annual Report 2004

LHR-0033::3377

John Menzies plc
108 Princes Street,  Edinburgh, EH2 3AA

Tel: +44 (0) 131 225 8555  Fax: +44 (0) 131 226 3752

Company No. SC34970

Email: info@johnmenziesplc.com

www.johnmenziesplc.com