UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended November 30, 2016
or
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the transition period from to .
Commission File No. 001-09195
KB HOME
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
95-3666267
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
10990 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90024
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (310) 231-4000
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Common Stock (par value $1.00 per share)
Rights to Purchase Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock
Name of each exchange
on which registered
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not
be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III
of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller
reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer
Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes
No
The aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on May 31, 2016 was $1,310,456,995,
including 9,760,831 shares held by the registrant’s grantor stock ownership trust and excluding 21,665,352 shares held in treasury.
There were 85,072,695 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $1.00 per share, outstanding on December 31, 2016. The
registrant’s grantor stock ownership trust held an additional 9,431,756 shares of the registrant’s common stock on that date.
Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (incorporated into Part III).
Documents Incorporated by Reference
KB HOME
FORM 10-K
FOR THE YEAR ENDED NOVEMBER 30, 2016
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Business
Item 1.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Executive Officers of the Registrant
Properties
Legal Proceedings
PART I
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities
Selected Financial Data
Item 6.
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Item 9B. Other Information
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Item 11. Executive Compensation
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
Signatures
PART IV
Page
Number
1
10
16
16
16
16
17
17
19
20
45
46
96
96
97
97
98
98
98
98
99
103
104
Item 1. BUSINESS
General
PART I
KB Home is one of the largest and most recognized homebuilding companies in the U.S. and has been building homes for
nearly 60 years. We sell and build a variety of new homes designed primarily for first-time, move-up and active adult homebuyers,
including attached and detached single-family residential homes, townhomes and condominiums. We offer homes in development
communities, at urban in-fill locations and as part of mixed-use projects. Our homebuilding operations represent most of our
business, accounting for 99.7% of our total revenues in 2016. Our financial services operations, which accounted for .3% of our
total revenues in 2016, offer various insurance products to our homebuyers and title services in certain markets. From July 2014
until October 2016, our financial services operations provided mortgage banking services, including residential consumer mortgage
loan (“mortgage loan”) originations, to our homebuyers indirectly through Home Community Mortgage, LLC (“HCM”), an
unconsolidated joint venture we formed with Nationstar Mortgage LLC (“Nationstar”).
Unless the context indicates otherwise, the terms “we,” “our” and “us” used in this report refer to KB Home, a Delaware
corporation, and its predecessors and subsidiaries. Also, as used in this report, “home” is a single-family residence, whether it is
a single-family home or other type of residential property; “community” is a single development in which new homes are constructed
as part of an integrated plan; and “community count” is the number of communities we have open for sales with at least five homes/
lots left to sell.
The following charts present homes delivered and homebuilding revenues for the years ended November 30, 2014, 2015 and
2016:
Markets
Reflecting the geographic reach of our homebuilding business, we have ongoing operations in the seven states and 36 major
markets presented below. We also operate in various submarkets within these major markets. From time to time, we refer to these
markets and submarkets collectively as our “served markets.” For reporting purposes, we organize our homebuilding operations
into four segments — West Coast, Southwest, Central and Southeast.
1
Segment
State(s)
West Coast California
Major Market(s)
Contra Costa County, Fresno, Los Angeles, Madera, Oakland, Orange County, Riverside,
Sacramento, San Bernardino, San Diego, San Francisco, San Jose, Santa Rosa-Petaluma,
Stockton, Vallejo, Ventura and Yuba City
Southwest Arizona
Phoenix and Tucson
Central
Nevada
Colorado
Texas
Las Vegas
Denver
Austin, Dallas, Fort Worth, Houston and San Antonio
Southeast
Florida
Daytona Beach, Jacksonville, Lakeland, Orlando, Palm Coast, Punta Gorda, Sarasota,
Sebastian-Vero Beach and Tampa
North Carolina Raleigh
Segment Operating Information. The following table presents certain operating information for our homebuilding reporting
segments for the years ended November 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014 (dollars in millions, except average selling price):
West Coast:
Homes delivered
Percentage of total homes delivered
Average selling price
Total revenues (a)
Southwest:
Homes delivered
Percentage of total homes delivered
Average selling price
Total revenues (a)
Central:
Homes delivered
Percentage of total homes delivered
Average selling price
Total revenues (a)
Southeast:
Homes delivered
Percentage of total homes delivered
Average selling price
Total revenues (a)
Total:
Homes delivered
Average selling price
Total revenues (a)
Years Ended November 30,
2016
2015
2014
2,825
29%
579,900
1,638.1
1,559
16%
287,000
447.5
3,744
38%
270,100
1,018.5
1,701
17%
281,400
478.9
9,829
363,800
3,582.9
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
2,258
27%
587,000
1,402.3
1,311
16%
284,600
398.2
3,183
39%
252,200
809.7
1,444
18%
281,900
410.8
8,196
354,800
3,021.0
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,913
27%
569,700
1,089.9
736
10%
271,100
199.5
3,098
43%
223,800
698.4
1,468
20%
263,600
401.9
7,215
328,400
2,389.6
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
(a) Total revenues include revenues from housing and land sales.
Additional financial and operational information related to our homebuilding reporting segments, including revenues, pretax
income (loss), inventories and assets, is provided below in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations” section and in Note 2 – Segment Information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this
report.
2
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures. The above table does not include homes delivered or revenues from unconsolidated joint
ventures in which we participate. These unconsolidated joint ventures acquire and develop land in various markets where our
homebuilding operations are located and, in some cases, build and deliver homes on the land developed.
Strategy
In the 2016 fourth quarter, we outlined a plan for returns-focused growth that is designed to drive higher revenues and
improvement in our operating income margin, return on invested capital, return on equity and leverage ratio, and we established
three-year financial targets for these metrics. The plan’s main components are (1) executing our core business strategy;
(2) improving our asset efficiency and (3) monetizing our significant deferred tax assets. We believe implementing this plan will,
among other things, accelerate internal cash generation that will support a balanced approach to investing in land and land
development and reducing our debt.
Executing Our Core Business Strategy. Our core business strategy, which we refined in 2016 and call KB 2020, is to expand
our scale within our current geographic footprint to establish a top-five market share position in each of our served markets (based
on homes delivered) by building communities that offer a compelling combination of affordability, choice and personalization.
This strategy is grounded in a systematic, fact-based and process-driven approach to homebuilding and encompasses the following
key principles with respect to customers, land, products and operations:
• Customers. For each of our served markets, we gain a detailed understanding of consumers’ location and product
preferences, as well as product price-to-value perceptions, through ongoing customer surveys and other market research.
Our primary focus is on first-time and first move-up buyers. First-time buyers have comprised nearly 60% of our homes
delivered over the past 10 years. In addition, our Built-to-Order™ homebuying process provides our buyers with a wide
range of choices in the major aspects of their future home, together with a personalized customer experience through our
in-house community teams. These teams are made up of sales representatives, design consultants and other personnel
who partner closely with each buyer and maintain constant communication from the initial sale of their home to its
delivery.
• Land. We seek to manage our working capital and reduce our operating risks by primarily acquiring entitled land parcels
at reasonable prices within attractive submarkets as identified by our market research activities. We typically focus on
metropolitan areas with favorable long-term economic and population growth prospects that we believe have the potential
to sustain a minimum of 800 homes delivered per year, and target land parcels that provide a two- to three-year supply
of lots per community and meet our investment return standards. Identified consumer preferences and home sales activity
largely direct where our land acquisition teams search for available land. We leverage the relationships we have with
land owners, developers and brokers in our served markets to acquire land, and use our experience in working with
municipalities to efficiently obtain entitlements and any other required development approvals, typically before or
concurrently with closing on a parcel.
•
Products. We offer our customers a base product with a standardized set of functions and features at a competitive and
relatively affordable price that generally aligns with the local area’s median household income level. Our Built-to-Order
approach provides customers the opportunity to select their lot location, floor plan, elevation and structural options, and
to personalize their homes with numerous interior design options and upgrades in our design studios. Our design studios,
generally centrally located within our served markets, are a key component of our Built-to-Order process, and the mix
of design options and upgrades they offer are primarily based on the preferences identified by consumer survey and
purchase frequency data. We utilize a centralized internal architectural group that designs homes to meet or exceed
customers’ price-to-value expectations while being as efficient as possible to construct. Our architectural group has
developed a core series of flexible floor plans and elevations that we can offer across many of our served markets, which
helps us understand the cost to build our products and enables us to compare and implement best practices across divisions
or communities. We also incorporate energy-efficient features into our product designs to help lower the total cost of
homeownership for our buyers and to reduce our homes’ impact on the environment, as further discussed below. As used
in this report and elsewhere, the term “product” encompasses a home’s floor plan design and interior/exterior style,
amenities, functions and features.
• Operations. In addition to differentiating us from other high-production homebuilders, our Built-to-Order process helps
to drive low-cost production. We generally commence construction of a home only after we have a signed purchase
contract with a buyer and have obtained preliminary credit approval or other evidence of the buyer’s financial ability to
purchase a home, and seek to build a backlog of sold homes. Maintaining a healthy backlog, along with centralized
scheduling and standardized reporting processes, helps us sustain an even-flow production of pre-sold homes, which
reduces our inventory risk, enhances efficiencies in the construction process and our relationships with independent
subcontractors, and provides us with greater visibility and predictability on future deliveries.
3
We consider our strategy to be integral to our success in the homebuilding industry. However, there may be market-driven
circumstances where we believe it is necessary or appropriate to temporarily deviate from certain of its principles. These deviations
may include starting construction on a small number of homes in a community before corresponding purchase contracts are signed
with buyers to more quickly meet customer delivery expectations and generate revenues; or acquiring land parcels in peripheral
neighborhoods of a core metropolitan area that otherwise fit our growth strategy and meet our investment return standards. In
addition, other circumstances could arise in the future that may lead us to make specific short-term shifts from these principles.
Improving Asset Efficiency. We have had an ongoing focus on, and will continue our efforts in 2017 for, improving our asset
efficiency, including, among other things, generating higher net orders per community and greater profitability per home delivered
by balancing sales pace and selling prices, and managing our direct construction costs, within our communities; structuring land
acquisitions to minimize upfront costs, as further discussed below; reactivating communities that have been held for future
development; and selling non-core assets.
We have achieved significant progress in reactivating communities over the past several years and plan to reactivate additional
communities in 2017. As of November 30, 2016, our land held for future development represented 11% of our total inventories,
down from 16% at November 30, 2015 and from its peak of 43% at November 30, 2011. Our objective is to reduce our land held
for future development, through reactivations and land sales, to less than 4% of our total inventory by 2019.
In line with this objective, in the 2016 fourth quarter, we announced our decision to sell more than 20 land parcels that no
longer fit into our business plans due to one or more of the following reasons: the land is in excess of near-term requirements; we
now believe the necessary incremental investment in development is not justified; the land is located in areas outside of our served
markets; and/or the land is entitled for certain product types that are not aligned with our primary product offerings. Actions
required to complete the planned sales have been or will soon be initiated, with the objective of closing these transactions within
one year. As discussed in Note 7 – Inventory Impairments and Land Option Contract Abandonments in the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements in this report, we recognized inventory impairment charges to reduce the carrying values of these land parcels
to their estimated fair values, less associated costs to sell.
While reactivations and land sales can have a negative impact on our housing gross profit margin, they are generally accretive
to earnings and returns, and generate cash that we can redeploy for investments in land that are expected to generate a higher return
and grow our business. Such growth should enable us to leverage greater operating efficiencies that are expected to accompany
a larger scale. The cash proceeds from activations and land sales can also be used to reduce our debt, consistent with our plan.
Monetizing Our Deferred Tax Assets. By increasing our scale and further improving our asset efficiency, the anticipated
associated revenue and pretax income growth will enable us to accelerate the utilization of our deferred tax assets, which totaled
$739 million at November 30, 2016. We believe we can realize $300 million to $400 million in tax cash savings by the end of
2019, and intend to productively deploy the cash to invest in our business and/or to reduce debt.
Key Three-Year Financial Targets. We have set the following specific financial targets for 2019 that we believe will result
from executing on our returns-focused growth plan:
• Housing revenues greater than $5 billion.
• Operating income margin of 8% to 9%.
• Return on invested capital in excess of 10%.
• Return on equity in the low-to-mid double-digit range.
• Net debt-to-capital ratio of 40% to 50%.
We believe that our plan provides a clear roadmap for achieving these targets, and the potential to produce a meaningful
increase in long-term stockholder value. By increasing our scale while improving our asset efficiency, we expect to generate
higher revenues, profitability and internal cash flows, both from operations and from using our deferred tax assets. The stronger
cash flows, in turn, can be directed, in a balanced manner, to invest in the further growth of our business and/or reduce debt,
providing an opportunity for improved housing gross profit margins.
Promotional Marketing Strategy. Our promotional marketing efforts are centered on differentiating the KB Home brand from
resale homes and from new homes sold by other homebuilders. These efforts increasingly involve interactive Internet-based
applications, social media outlets and other evolving communication technologies.
4
In each of our communities, we build, decorate and landscape model homes which play a key role in providing customers
with a hands-on experience. Our sales teams are trained by us and have extensive knowledge of management operating policies
and our products, assisting homebuyers in all aspects of their purchase.
Customer Service. Our on-site construction supervisors perform regular pre-closing quality checks and our sales representatives
maintain regular contact with our homebuyers during the home construction process in an effort to ensure our homes meet our
standards and our homebuyers’ expectations. We also have employees who are responsible for responding to homebuyers’ post-
closing needs, including warranty claims. Information about our limited warranty program is provided in Note 15 – Commitments
and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
Operational Structure. We operate our homebuilding business through divisions with experienced management teams who
have in-depth local knowledge of their particular served markets, which helps us acquire land in preferred locations; develop
communities with products that meet local demand; and understand local regulatory environments. Our division management
teams exercise considerable autonomy in identifying land acquisition opportunities; developing land and communities;
implementing product, marketing and sales strategies; and controlling costs. To help maintain consistent execution within the
organization, our division management teams and other employees are continuously trained on KB2020 principles and are evaluated,
in part, based on their achievement of relevant operational objectives.
Our corporate management and support personnel develop and oversee the implementation of company-wide strategic
initiatives, our overall operational policies and internal control standards, and perform various centralized functions, including
architecture; purchasing and national contracts; treasury and cash management; land acquisition approval; risk and litigation
management; accounting and financial reporting; internal audit and compliance activities; information technology systems; and
investor and media relations. Corporate management is responsible for, among other things, evaluating and selecting the geographic
markets in which we operate, consistent with our overall business strategy; allocating capital resources to markets for land
acquisition and development activities; making major personnel decisions related to employee compensation and benefits; and
monitoring the financial and operational performance of our divisions.
Community Development and Land Inventory Management
Developable land for the production of homes is a core resource for our business. Based on our current strategic plans, we
seek to own or control land sufficient to meet our forecasted production goals for the next three to five years. In 2017, we intend
to continue to invest in and develop land positions within attractive submarkets and selectively acquire or control additional land
that meets our investment return standards. However, we may decide to sell certain land interests or monetize land previously
held for future development as part of our returns-focused growth plan, or for other reasons.
Our community development process generally consists of four phases: land acquisition, land development into finished lots
for a community (if necessary), home construction and delivery of completed homes to buyers. Historically, our community
development process has typically ranged from six to 24 months in our West Coast homebuilding reporting segment, with a
somewhat shorter duration in our other homebuilding reporting segments. Our community development process varies based on,
among other things, the extent and speed of required government approvals and utility service activations, the overall size of a
particular community, the scope of necessary site preparation activities, the type of product(s) that will be offered, weather
conditions, time of year, promotional marketing results, the availability of construction resources, consumer demand, local and
general economic and housing market conditions, and other factors.
Although they vary significantly in size and complexity, our communities typically consist of 30 to 250 lots ranging in size
from 1,900 to 11,500 square feet. In our communities, we typically offer three to 15 home design choices. We also generally
build one to three model homes at each community so that prospective buyers can preview the various products available. Depending
on the community, we may offer premium lots containing more square footage, better views and/or location benefits. Some of
our communities consist of multiple-story structures that encompass several attached condominium-style units.
Land Acquisition and Land Development. We continuously evaluate land acquisition opportunities against our investment
return standards, while also balancing competing needs for financial strength, liquidity and land inventory for future growth. When
we acquire land, we generally focus on parcels with lots that are entitled for residential construction and are either physically
developed to start home construction (referred to as “finished lots”) or partially finished. However, depending on market conditions
and available opportunities, we may acquire undeveloped and/or unentitled land. We may also invest in land that requires us to
repurpose and re-entitle the property for residential use, such as in-fill developments. We expect that the overall balance of
undeveloped, unentitled, entitled, partially finished and finished lots in our inventory will vary over time, and in implementing
our strategic growth initiatives, we may acquire a greater proportion of undeveloped or unentitled land in the future if and as the
availability of reasonably-priced land with finished or partially finished lots diminishes.
5
As noted above, we target geographic areas for potential land acquisitions and community development based on the results
of periodic surveys of both new and resale homebuyers in particular markets, prevailing local economic conditions and home sales
activity, the supply and type of homes that are available for sale, and other market research activities. Local, in-house specialists
analyze specific geographic areas to identify desirable land acquisition targets, or to evaluate whether to dispose of an existing
land interest. We also use studies performed by third-party specialists.
We generally structure our land acquisition and land development activities to minimize, or to defer the timing of, expenditures
in order to reduce both the market risks associated with holding land and our working capital and financial commitments, including
interest and other carrying costs. We typically use contracts that, in exchange for a small initial option payment or earnest money
deposit, give us an option or similar right to acquire land at a future date, usually at a pre-determined price and pending our
satisfaction with the feasibility of developing and selling homes on the land and/or an underlying land seller’s completion of certain
obligations, such as securing entitlements, developing infrastructure or finishing lots. We refer to land subject to such option or
similar contractual rights as being “controlled.” Our decision to exercise a particular land option or similar right is based on the
results of our due diligence and continued market viability analysis after entering into such a contract. Information related to our
land option contracts and other similar contracts is provided in Note 7 – Inventory Impairments and Land Option Contract
Abandonments in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
The following table presents the number of inventory lots we owned, in various stages of development, or controlled under
land option contracts or other similar contracts by homebuilding reporting segment as of November 30, 2016 and 2015:
Homes Under
Construction and Land
Under Development
Land Held for Future
Development or Sale
Land Under
Option
Total Land
Owned or
Under Option
2016
2015
2016
2015
2016
2015
2016
2015
West Coast
Southwest
Central
Southeast
Total
5,192
4,912
13,090
3,453
26,647
4,526
6,349
13,793
3,999
28,667
2,202
2,525
1,058
3,150
8,935
2,768
1,871
1,254
3,500
9,393
3,510
901
4,124
708
9,243
4,126
761
2,700
1,752
9,339
10,904
8,338
18,272
7,311
44,825
11,420
8,981
17,747
9,251
47,399
The following charts present the percentage of inventory lots we owned or controlled under land option contracts or other
similar contracts by homebuilding reporting segment and the percentage of total lots we owned and controlled under option as of
November 30, 2016:
6
Home Construction and Deliveries. Following the acquisition of land and, if necessary, the development of the land into
finished lots, we typically begin constructing model homes and marketing homes for sale. To minimize the costs and risks of
unsold homes in production, we generally begin construction of a home only after we have a signed purchase contract with a buyer
and have obtained preliminary credit approval or other evidence of the buyer’s financial ability to purchase the home. However,
cancellations of home purchase contracts prior to the delivery of the underlying homes, the construction of attached products with
some unsold units, or specific strategic considerations will result in our having unsold completed or partially completed homes in
our inventory.
We act as the general contractor for the majority of our communities, and engage outside general contractors in all other
instances. We, or the outside general contractors we engage, contract with a variety of independent subcontractors, who are
typically locally based, to perform all land development and home construction work through their own employees or subcontractors.
We do not self-perform any land development or home construction work. These independent subcontractors also supply some
of the building materials required for such production activities. Our contracts with these independent subcontractors require that
they comply with all laws applicable to their work, including wage and safety laws, meet performance standards, and follow local
building codes and permits.
Raw Materials. Outside of land, the principal raw materials used in our production process are concrete and forest products.
Other primary materials used in home construction include drywall and plumbing and electrical items. We source all of our building
materials from third parties. We attempt to enhance the efficiency of our operations by using, where practical, standardized materials
that are commercially available on competitive terms from a variety of outside sources. In addition, we have national and regional
purchasing programs for certain building materials, appliances, fixtures and other items that allow us to benefit from large-quantity
purchase discounts and, where available, participate in outside manufacturer or supplier rebate programs. When possible, we
arrange for bulk purchases of these products at favorable prices from such manufacturers and suppliers. Although our purchasing
strategies have helped us in negotiating favorable prices for raw materials, in recent years we have encountered higher prices for
certain raw materials.
Backlog
Our “backlog” consists of homes that are under a purchase contract but have not yet been delivered to a buyer. Ending backlog
represents the number of homes in backlog from the previous period plus the number of net orders (new orders for homes less
cancellations) generated during the current period minus the number of homes delivered during the current period. Our backlog
at any given time will be affected by cancellations, homes delivered and our community count. Our cancellation rates and the
factors affecting such rates are further discussed below in both the “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” sections in this report. The number of homes we deliver has historically increased
from the first to the fourth quarter in any year. Substantially all of our homes in backlog at November 30, 2016 are expected to
be delivered during the year ended November 30, 2017.
Our backlog at November 30, 2016 increased 11% to 4,420 from 3,966 homes at November 30, 2015, largely due to a year-
over-year increase in our net orders in 2016. Our backlog at November 30, 2016 represented potential future housing revenues
of approximately $1.52 billion, a 19% increase from approximately $1.28 billion at November 30, 2015, reflecting the larger
number of homes in our backlog and a higher average selling price of those homes.
The following charts present our ending backlog (number of homes and value) by homebuilding reporting segment as of
November 30, 2015 and 2016:
7
Employees
At December 31, 2016 and 2015, we had approximately 1,790 and 1,680 full-time employees, respectively. None of our
employees are represented by a collective bargaining agreement.
Competition, Seasonality, Delivery Mix and Other Factors
Competition. The homebuilding industry and housing market are highly competitive with respect to selling homes; contracting
for construction services, such as carpentry, roofing, electrical and plumbing; and acquiring attractive developable land, though
the intensity of competition can vary and fluctuate between and within individual markets and submarkets. We compete for
homebuyers, construction resources and desirable land against numerous homebuilders, ranging from regional and national firms
to small local enterprises. As to homebuyers, we primarily compete with other homebuilders on the basis of selling price, community
location and amenities, availability of financing options, home designs, reputation, home construction cycle time, and the design
options and upgrades that can be included in a home. In some cases, this competition occurs within larger residential development
projects containing separate sections designed, planned and developed by other homebuilders. We also compete for homebuyers
against housing alternatives to new homes, including resale homes, apartments, single-family rentals and other rental housing. In
markets experiencing heavy construction activity, there can be severe craft and skilled trade shortages that limit independent
subcontractors’ ability to supply construction services to us, which in turn tends to drive up our costs and/or extend our production
schedules. Elevated construction activity has also contributed to measurable increases in the cost of certain building materials,
such as lumber, drywall and concrete. Since 2013, we also have seen higher prices for desirable land amid heightened competition
with homebuilders and other developers and investors, particularly in the land-constrained areas we are strategically targeting.
We expect these upward cost trends to continue in 2017 if and as housing market activity grows and there is greater competition
for these resources.
Seasonality. Our performance is affected by seasonal demand trends for housing. Traditionally, there has been more consumer
demand for home purchases and we tend to generate more net orders in the spring and early summer months (corresponding to
most of our second quarter and part of our third quarter) than at other times of the year. With our distinct homebuying approach
and typical home construction cycle times, this “selling season” demand results in our delivering more homes and generating
higher revenues from late summer through the fall months (corresponding to part of our third quarter and all of our fourth quarter).
On a relative basis, the winter and early spring months within our first quarter and part of our second quarter usually produce the
8
fewest net orders, homes delivered and revenues, and the sequential difference from our fourth quarter to our first quarter can be
significant.
Delivery Mix and Other Factors. In addition to the overall volume of homes we sell and deliver, our results in a given period
are significantly affected by the geographic mix of markets and submarkets in which we operate; the number and characteristics
of the communities we have open for sales in those markets and submarkets; and the products we sell from those communities
during the period. While there are some similarities, there are differences within and between our served markets in terms of the
quantity, size and nature of the communities we operate and the products we offer to consumers. These differences reflect, among
other things, local homebuyer preferences; household demographics (e.g., large families or working professionals; income levels);
geographic context (e.g., urban or suburban; availability of reasonably priced finished lots; development constraints; residential
density); and the shifts that can occur in these factors over time. These factors in each of our served markets will affect the costs
we incur and the time it takes to locate, acquire rights to and develop land, open communities for sales, and market and build
homes; the size of our homes; our selling prices (including the contribution from homebuyers’ purchases of design options and
upgrades); the pace at which we sell and deliver homes and close out communities; and our housing gross profits and housing
gross profit margins. Therefore, our results in any given period will fluctuate compared to other periods based on the proportion
of homes delivered from areas with higher or lower selling prices and on the corresponding land and overhead costs incurred to
generate those deliveries, as well as from our overall community count.
Financing
Our operations have historically been funded by internally generated cash flows, public equity and debt issuances, land option
contracts and other similar contracts and land seller financing, and performance bonds and letters of credit. We also have the
ability to borrow funds under our unsecured revolving credit facility with various banks (“Credit Facility”). Depending on market
conditions and available opportunities, we may obtain project financing, or secure external financing with community or other
inventory assets that we own or control. By “project financing,” we mean loans that are specifically obtained for, or secured by,
particular communities or other inventory assets. We may also arrange or engage in bank loan, project debt or other financial
transactions and/or expand the capacity of the Credit Facility or our cash-collateralized letter of credit facility with a financial
institution (the “LOC Facility”) or enter into additional such facilities.
Environmental Compliance Matters and Sustainability
As part of our due diligence process for land acquisitions, we often use third-party environmental consultants to investigate
potential environmental risks, and we require disclosures, representations and warranties from land sellers regarding environmental
risks. We may, from time to time, acquire property that requires us to incur environmental clean-up costs after conducting appropriate
due diligence, including, but not limited to, using detailed investigations performed by environmental consultants. In such instances,
we take steps prior to our acquisition of the land to gain reasonable assurance as to the precise scope of work required and the
costs associated with removal, site restoration and/or monitoring. To the extent contamination or other environmental issues have
occurred in the past, we will attempt to recover restoration costs from third parties, such as the generators of hazardous waste,
land sellers or others in the prior chain of title and/or their insurers. Based on these practices, we anticipate that it is unlikely that
environmental clean-up costs will have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements. However, despite these efforts,
there can be no assurance that we will avoid material liabilities relating to the existence or removal of toxic wastes, site restoration,
monitoring or other environmental matters affecting properties currently or previously owned or controlled by us, and no estimate
of any potential liabilities can be made. We have not been notified by any governmental agency of any claim that any of the
properties owned or formerly owned by us are identified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (or similar state or local
agency) as being a “Superfund” (or similar state or local) clean-up site requiring remediation, which could have a material effect
on our future consolidated financial statements. Costs associated with the use of environmental consultants are not material to
our consolidated financial statements.
We have made a dedicated effort to further differentiate ourselves from other homebuilders and resale homes through our
ongoing commitment to become a leading national company in environmental sustainability. We continually seek out and utilize
innovative technologies and systems to further improve the energy and water efficiency of our homes, as well as engage in campaigns
and other educational efforts, sometimes together with other companies, organizations and groups, to increase consumer awareness
of the importance and impact of sustainability in selecting a home and the products within a home. Under our commitment to
sustainability, we, among other things:
•
•
build energy- and water-efficient new homes;
developed an Energy Performance Guide®, or EPG®, that informs our homebuyers of the relative energy efficiency and
the related estimated monthly energy costs of each of our homes as designed, compared to typical new and existing homes;
9
•
•
advanced home automation technologies, components and systems that can increase convenience for our homebuyers;
and
created and are adding more net-zero energy and zero freshwater design options, under a program called Double
ZeroHouse™ 3.0, that are available in select markets.
More information about our sustainability commitment can be found in our annual sustainability reports, which we have
published on our website since 2008. We intend to continue to research, evaluate and utilize new or improved products and
construction and business practices consistent with our commitment and believe our sustainability initiatives can help put us in a
better position, compared to resale homes and homebuilders with less-developed programs, to comply with evolving local, state
and federal rules and regulations intended to protect natural resources and to address climate change and similar environmental
concerns.
Access to Our Information
Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, beneficial ownership reports
on Forms 3, 4 and 5 and proxy statements, as well as all amendments to those reports are available free of charge through our
investor relations website at investor.kbhome.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed
with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). We will also provide these reports in electronic or paper
format free of charge upon request made to our investor relations department at investorrelations@kbhome.com or at our principal
executive offices. We intend for our investor relations website to be the primary location where investors and the general public
can obtain announcements regarding, and can learn more about, our financial and operational performance, business plans and
prospects, our board of directors, our senior executive management team, and our corporate governance policies, including our
articles of incorporation, by-laws, corporate governance principles, board committee charters, and ethics policy. We may from
time to time choose to disclose or post important information about our business on or through our investor relations website, and/
or through other electronic channels, including social media outlets, such as Facebook® (Facebook.com/KBHome) and Twitter®
(Twitter.com/KBHome), and other evolving communication technologies. The content available on or through our primary website
at www.kbhome.com, our investor relations website, including our sustainability reports, or social media outlets and other evolving
communication technologies is not incorporated by reference in this report or in any other filing we make with the SEC, and our
references to such content are intended to be inactive textual or oral references only. Our SEC filings are also available to the
public over the Internet at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. The public may also read and copy any document we file at the
SEC’s public reference room located at 100 F Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for
further information on the operation of the public reference room.
Item 1A. RISK FACTORS
The following important economic and market, strategic, operational, and legal and regulatory risk factors could adversely
impact our business. These factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking and other statements
that (a) we make in registration statements, periodic reports (including this report) and other filings with the SEC and from time
to time in our news releases, annual reports and other written reports or communications, (b) we post on or make available through
our websites and/or through other electronic channels, and (c) our personnel and representatives make orally from time to time.
Economic and Market Risks
Soft or negative economic or housing market conditions generally or in our served markets may materially and adversely affect
our business and consolidated financial statements.
As in 2016, we expect future home sales activity and selling price appreciation (or depreciation) to vary in strength between
markets and within submarkets based to a substantial degree on their specific economic and housing environments, which may
also reflect national, state and/or regional factors. These variations may be significant and unfavorable, and could be more
pronounced and/or prolonged in our served markets due to changes in conditions that are outside of our control, including, but
not limited to, the following:
• Employment levels and job and wage growth, particularly for individuals and households who make up our core first-
time and first move-up homebuyer demographic groups. If the recent upward trends in employment and income levels
for these demographic groups weaken or reverse, a corresponding reduction in demand for homes could negatively impact
our business, and the impact may be greater for us than for homebuilders that target more-experienced and/or higher-
income buyers.
• Negative population growth, household formations or other demographic changes that can impair demand for housing.
10
• Diminished consumer confidence in general or specifically with respect to purchasing homes, or lack of consumer interest
in purchasing a home compared to other housing alternatives.
•
•
•
Inflation, which could result in our production costs increasing at a rate or to a level that we cannot recover through the
selling prices of our homes. Inflation may also cause increases in mortgage loan interest rates, and in the interest rates
we may need to accept to obtain external financing for our business.
Shortages or rising prices of building materials and construction services, including independent contractor or outside
supplier capacity constraints. These conditions could increase our costs and/or extend our construction and home delivery
schedules, and we may be unable to raise the selling prices of our homes to cover the impact of such cost increases and/
or delays.
Seasonality, which as discussed above in the “Competition, Seasonality, Delivery Mix and Other Factors” section in this
report, generally results in fluctuations in our quarterly operating results, with a significant proportion of our homes
delivered and revenues generated in our third and fourth fiscal quarters. While this pattern reflects when consumers have
generally preferred to buy homes, we can provide no assurance that this historical seasonality will occur in 2017 or
beyond, if at all.
• Civil unrest and acts of terrorism, and government responses to such acts, as well as inclement weather, natural disasters,
and other environmental conditions can delay the delivery of our homes and/or increase our costs.
If economic or housing conditions become more challenging generally or in our served markets, due to the factors listed
above, whether individually or collectively, or otherwise, or home sales or selling prices do not continue to advance at the same
pace as in recent years or decline, there would likely be a corresponding adverse effect on our business and our consolidated
financial statements, including, but not limited to, our net orders, the number of homes we deliver, our average selling prices, the
revenues we generate, our housing gross profit margins and our ability to operate profitably, and the effect may be material. In
addition, adjustments to federal government economic, taxation and spending laws, policies or programs by the newly elected
administration and U.S. Congress may negatively impact the financial markets, consumer spending and/or the housing market,
and, in turn, materially and adversely affect our operating results and consolidated financial statements.
Tight mortgage lending standards and/or interest rate increases could adversely affect the availability or affordability of
mortgage loans for potential buyers of our homes and thereby reduce our net orders, homes delivered and revenues. The poor
performance of third-party mortgage lenders could delay our delivery of homes and recognition of revenues from those homes.
We depend on third-party lenders to provide mortgage loans to our buyers who need such financing to purchase our homes,
and our dependence on such lenders is greater than for other homebuilders that operate a captive mortgage lender, have a mortgage
banking services joint venture, or have secured a marketing relationship with a lender or loan originator. Buyers’ ability to obtain
financing largely depends on prevailing mortgage loan interest rates, the credit standards that mortgage lenders use and the
availability of mortgage loan programs provided by federal government agencies (such as Federal Housing Administration
(“FHA”)- or Veterans Administration-insured mortgage loans), or government-sponsored enterprises (such as the Federal National
Mortgage Association (also known as “Fannie Mae”) or the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (also known as “Freddie
Mac”)), which have been a critical source of liquidity for the mortgage finance industry and an important factor in marketing and
selling many of our homes. Although mortgage loan interest rates have been at historically low levels for the last few years, they
have trended higher since the 2016 fourth quarter. If mortgage loan interest rates increase further, credit standards are tightened
and/or the federal government reduces or terminates its mortgage loan programs, the affordability of and demand for homes,
including our homes, would likely be adversely impacted, and the impact could be material to our business and consolidated
financial statements.
Our buyers may obtain mortgage financing for their home purchases from any lender of their choice. However, we can provide
no assurance as to third-party lenders’ ability or willingness to complete, in a timely fashion or at all, the mortgage loan originations
they start for our homebuyers. Lenders’ inability or unwillingness may result in mortgage loan funding issues that delay deliveries
of our homes and/or cause cancellations, which could in the aggregate have a material adverse effect on our business and our
consolidated financial statements.
The homebuilding industry and housing market are very competitive, and competitive conditions could adversely affect our
business and consolidated financial statements.
We face significant competition in several areas of our business from other homebuilders, sellers of existing homes, and other
participants in the overall housing industry, including landlords and other rental housing operators. These competitive conditions
can result in, among other things, our selling and delivering fewer homes; our reducing the selling prices of our homes and/or
offering or increasing sales incentives; our being unable to acquire desirable land that meets our investment return standards; and
11
our being unable to obtain construction resources at acceptable prices or when needed to meet our production schedules. These
competitive conditions could have a material adverse effect on our business and consolidated financial statements by decreasing
our revenues and housing gross profit margins; impairing our ability to successfully implement our current strategies, initiatives
or actions; increasing our costs; and/or diminishing growth in our business.
Strategic Risks
Our ability to execute on our primary strategies is inherently uncertain, and we may be unable to achieve our goals.
We can provide no assurance that our strategies, and any related initiatives or actions, will be successful, that they will generate
growth or earnings or returns at any particular level or within any particular time frame, or that we will achieve in 2017 or beyond
positive operational or financial results or results in any particular metric or measure equal to or better than our 2016 performance,
or perform in any period as well as other homebuilders. We also cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to maintain
our strategies, and any related initiatives or actions, in 2017 and, due to unexpectedly favorable or unfavorable market conditions
or other factors, we may determine that we need to adjust, refine or abandon all or portions of our strategies, initiatives or actions,
though we cannot guarantee that any such changes will be successful. The failure of any one or more of our present strategies,
or any related initiatives or actions, or the failure of any adjustments that we may pursue or implement, would likely have an
adverse effect on our ability to increase the value and profitability of our business; on our ability to operate our business in the
ordinary course; on our overall liquidity; and on our consolidated financial statements, and the effect in each case could be material.
The success of our present strategies depends on the availability of developable land that meets our investment return standards.
The availability of developable land, particularly finished and partially finished lots, meeting our investment return standards
depends on several factors, including, among other things, land availability in general, geographical/topographical/governmental
constraints, land sellers’ business relationships and competition for desirable property. Should suitable land become less available,
the number of homes we deliver could be reduced. In addition, the cost of attractive land could increase and adversely impact
our housing gross profit margins and our ability to maintain ownership or control of a sufficient supply of land to meet our
production goals. A lack of available suitable land could also affect the success of our current strategies, and related initiatives,
including our ability to grow our scale and share in our served markets; to expand our community count; to maintain or increase
our revenues; and to maintain or improve our profitability in 2017 and beyond, and could have a material adverse effect on our
business and consolidated financial statements.
Our business is concentrated in certain geographic markets and declines in one or more of our key served markets could
materially affect our business and consolidated financial statements.
Home sales activity and selling prices in some of our key served markets have varied from time to time for market-specific
and other reasons, including adverse weather, high levels of foreclosures, short sales and sales of lender-owned homes, and lack
of affordability or economic contraction. If home sales activity or selling prices decline in one or more of our key served markets,
including California, Florida, Nevada or Texas, our costs may not decline at all or at the same rate and, as a result, our consolidated
financial statements may be materially and adversely affected.
Adverse conditions in California, which makes up our West Coast homebuilding reporting segment, would have a particularly
significant effect as our average selling price in this segment is the highest among all of our homebuilding reporting segments, a
large percentage of our housing revenues is generated from this segment, and a significant proportion of our investments in land
and land development have been made, and in 2017 are expected to be made, in that state. In addition, as some of the areas we
serve in California are, or have until recently been, experiencing extreme or exceptional drought conditions, we can offer no
assurance as to the conservation measures, including impact fees or penalties, that might be imposed by local water agencies/
suppliers that could limit, impair or delay our ability to sell and deliver homes; increase our production costs; or decrease the value
of land we own or control, which may result in inventory impairment or land option contract abandonment charges, or both. These
impacts, individually or collectively, could adversely affect our overall business and consolidated financial statements, and the
effect could be material. Moreover, as California is one of the most highly regulated and litigious states in the country, our potential
exposure to losses and expenses due to new laws, regulations or litigation may be greater than for other homebuilders with a less
significant California presence.
12
Operational Risks
We may have difficulty in obtaining additional financing and/or may be restricted in accessing external capital, and to the
extent we can access external financing, it may increase our capital costs or result in stockholder dilution. Under certain
circumstances, our obligations to repay our indebtedness may be accelerated and we may be unable to do so.
Our homebuilding operations and our present strategies require significant amounts of cash and/or the availability of external
financing. We have historically supported our operations with internally generated cash flows, public equity and debt issuances,
land option contracts and other similar contracts and land seller financing. In addition, we have entered into the Credit Facility
and the LOC Facility and obtained performance bonds for certain ordinary course aspects of our operations. While we believe
we can meet our forecasted capital and operating requirements from our cash resources, expected future cash flows from our
operations and anticipated available external financing sources, we can provide no assurance that we will be able to do so at all
or without incurring substantially higher costs.
Capital market conditions in 2017 and beyond may significantly limit our ability to obtain additional external financing and/
or maintain or, if necessary or appropriate, expand the Credit Facility’s or the LOC Facility’s capacity, or enter into additional or
similar such facilities, or obtain performance bonds, in each case on acceptable terms or at all. The relatively low market value
of our common stock and volatility in the securities markets could impede our access to such markets or increase the dilution our
stockholders would experience if we believe it is necessary or appropriate to issue additional equity securities. As of the date of
this report, our credit rating by Fitch Ratings is B+, with a stable outlook, our credit rating by Moody’s Investor Services is B2,
with a positive outlook, and our credit rating by Standard and Poor’s Financial Services is B, with a stable outlook. Downgrades
of our credit rating by any of these firms may also make it more difficult and costly for us to access external financing sources.
The adverse effects of these conditions or events could be material to our business and our consolidated financial statements.
If we fail to comply with the covenants and other requirements imposed by the Credit Facility and the other instruments
governing our indebtedness, the participating financial institutions and/or investors could terminate the Credit Facility, cause
borrowings under the Credit Facility, if any, or the outstanding principal and unpaid interest under our senior notes, if applicable,
to become immediately due and payable and/or could demand that we compensate them for waiving instances of noncompliance.
In addition, a default under the Credit Facility or under any series of our senior notes could in certain cases accelerate the maturity
of all of our senior notes and restrict borrowings under the Credit Facility, as well as result in penalties and additional fees.
If any such covenant noncompliance or default occurs, it would likely have a material adverse impact on our liquidity, on our
ability to operate our business in the ordinary course and on our consolidated financial statements. In addition, we may need to
curtail our investment activities and other uses of cash to maintain compliance with the covenants and other requirements under
the Credit Facility and the other instruments governing our indebtedness, which could impair our ability to achieve our strategic
growth goals.
As described in Note 13 – Notes Payable in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report, if a change of
control or if a fundamental change were to occur prior to the stated maturity date of our senior notes, we may be required to offer
to purchase certain of our senior notes, plus accrued interest and unpaid interest, if any. In such circumstances, if we are unable
to generate sufficient cash flows from our operations, we may need to refinance and/or restructure with our lenders or other creditors
all or a portion of our outstanding debt obligations on or before their maturity, which we may not be able to do on favorable terms
or at all, or raise capital through equity or convertible security issuances that could significantly dilute existing stockholders’
interests, and the impact of such circumstances on our liquidity and consolidated financial statements would be material and
adverse.
We have a substantial amount of indebtedness in relation to our tangible net worth and unrestricted cash balance, which may
restrict our ability to meet our operational and strategic growth goals.
The amount of our debt overall and relative to our total stockholders’ equity and unrestricted cash balance could have important
consequences. For example, it could limit our ability to obtain future financing for working capital, capital expenditures,
acquisitions, debt service obligations or other business needs; limit our ability to maintain compliance with the Credit Facility’s
financial covenants, or to renew or expand the capacity of the Credit Facility; require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our
cash flows from our operations to the payment of our debt service obligations and reduce our ability to use our cash flows for
other purposes; impact our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business; limit our ability to successfully
implement our current strategies, initiatives or actions, in part due to competition from others with greater available liquidity;
place us at a competitive disadvantage because we have more debt than some of our competitors; and make us more vulnerable
in the event of a downturn in our business or in general economic or housing market conditions.
Our ability to meet our debt service and other obligations necessary to operate our business in the ordinary course will depend
on our future performance. As of the date of this report, our next scheduled maturity of senior notes is on September 15, 2017
13
with respect to $165.0 million in aggregate principal amount of our 9.100% senior notes due 2017 (“9.10% Senior Notes due
2017”), reflecting our optional early redemption of $100.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the notes outstanding in
January 2017.
Reduced home sales may impair our ability to recoup development costs or force us to absorb additional costs.
Depending on the stage of development a land parcel is in when acquired, we may incur expenditures for developing land
into a community, such as entitling and finishing lots and installing roads, sewers, water systems and other utilities; taxes and
other levies related to ownership of the land; constructing model homes; and promotional marketing and overhead expenses to
prepare the community to open for home sales. If the rate at which we sell and deliver homes slows or falls, or if our opening of
communities for home sales is delayed due to adjustments in our investment strategy, protracted governmental approval processes
or utility service activations, or other reasons, we may incur additional costs, which would adversely affect our housing gross
profit margins, and it will take a longer period of time for us to recover our costs.
The value of the land and housing inventory we own or control may fall significantly.
The value of the land and housing inventory we currently own or control depends on market conditions, including estimates
of future demand for, and the revenues that can be generated from, this inventory. The value of our inventory can vary considerably
because there is often a significant amount of time between our acquiring control or taking ownership of land and the delivery of
homes on that land, particularly undeveloped and/or unentitled land. If, in 2017, the present economic or housing environment
weakens, if particular markets or submarkets experience challenging or unfavorable changes in prevailing business conditions,
including an increase in inflation, if we are unable to sell our land held for sale at its current estimated fair value, or if we elect to
revise our strategy relating to certain land positions, we may need to record charges against our earnings for inventory impairments
or land option contract abandonments, or both, which occurred in 2016. We may also decide to sell certain land at a loss and
record a corresponding charge. In addition, we may record charges against our earnings in connection with activating or selling
certain land held for future development in connection with our current strategic initiatives. Any such charges could have a material
adverse effect on our consolidated financial statements.
Homebuilding is subject to warranty and liability claims in the ordinary course of business that can be significant.
In the ordinary course of our homebuilding business, we are subject to home warranty and other construction defect claims.
We rely upon independent subcontractors to perform actual construction of our homes and in some cases, to select and obtain
building materials. We maintain, and require the majority of our independent subcontractors to maintain, general liability insurance
(including construction defect and bodily injury coverage) and workers’ compensation insurance. We self-insure a portion of our
overall risk through the use of a captive insurance subsidiary. We also maintain certain other insurance policies. However, the
coverage offered by and the availability of general liability insurance for construction defects are currently limited and costly, and,
in our case, have relatively high self-insured retentions that limit coverage significantly.
Because of the uncertainties inherent to these matters, including our ability to obtain recoveries for home warranty or other
construction defect claims from responsible independent contractors and/or their or our insurers, our recorded warranty and other
liabilities may not be adequate to address all of our expenditures associated with such claims in the future, and any such inadequacies
could negatively affect our consolidated financial statements, including from potentially recording charges to adjust our warranty
liability. Home warranty and other construction defect issues may also generate negative publicity in various media outlets,
including social media, websites, Internet blogs and newsletters, that could be detrimental to our reputation and adversely affect
our efforts to sell homes.
We can provide no assurance that in 2017 we will not face additional home warranty and other construction defect claims
and/or incur additional related repair and other costs, or experience negative publicity/reputational harm or be successful in
obtaining any recoveries of related repair and other costs, and that any of these items — if they occur, or with respect to recoveries
of related repair and other costs, fail to occur — could, individually or collectively, have a material and adverse impact on our
business and consolidated financial statements.
We may not realize our significant deferred income tax assets. In addition, our net operating loss carryforwards could be
substantially limited if we experience an ownership change as defined in the Internal Revenue Code.
At November 30, 2016, we had deferred tax assets of $739.0 million, net of a $24.8 million valuation allowance. Our ability
to realize our deferred tax assets is based on the extent to which we generate future taxable income and prevailing corporate income
tax rates, and we cannot provide any assurance as to when and to what extent we will generate sufficient future taxable income
to realize our deferred tax assets, whether in whole or in any part. Changes in existing tax laws or enacted corporate income tax
rates could impact such realization as well as the value of our deferred tax assets in our consolidated balance sheets, and these
impacts could be material.
14
The benefits of our deferred tax assets, including our net operating losses (“NOLs”), built-in losses and tax credits, would be
reduced or potentially eliminated if we experienced an “ownership change” under Internal Revenue Code Section 382
(“Section 382”). We currently believe that an ownership change has not occurred. However, if an ownership change were to
occur, the annual limit Section 382 may impose on the amount of NOLs we could use to reduce our taxable income could result
in a material amount of our NOLs expiring unused. This would significantly impair the value of our net deferred tax assets and,
as a result, have a material negative impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Our ability to attract and retain talent is critical to the success of our business and a failure to do so may materially and adversely
affect our performance.
Our officers and employees are important resources, and we see attracting and retaining a dedicated and talented team as
crucial to our success. If we are unable to continue to retain and attract qualified employees, or, alternatively, if we are required
or believe it is appropriate to reduce our overhead expenses through significant personnel reductions or adjustments to compensation
and benefits, our performance, our ability to achieve our strategic growth goals, our business and our consolidated financial
statements could be materially and adversely affected.
Information technology failures and data security breaches could harm our business.
We use information technology and other computer resources to carry out important operational activities and to maintain
our business records. Many of these resources are provided to us and/or maintained on our behalf by third-party service providers
pursuant to agreements that specify to varying degrees certain security and service level standards. Although we and our service
providers employ what we believe are adequate security, disaster recovery and other preventative and corrective measures, our
ability to conduct our business may be impaired if these resources, including our websites or e-mail system, are compromised,
degraded, damaged or fail, whether due to a virus or other harmful circumstance, intentional penetration or disruption of our
information technology resources by a third party, natural disaster, hardware or software corruption or failure or error or poor
product or vendor/developer selection (including a failure of security controls incorporated into or applied to such hardware or
software), telecommunications system failure, service provider error or failure, intentional or unintentional personnel actions
(including the failure to follow our security protocols), or lost connectivity to our networked resources.
A significant and extended disruption could damage our reputation and cause us to lose customers, orders, deliveries of homes
and revenues, result in the unintended and/or unauthorized public disclosure or the misappropriation of proprietary, personal
identifying and confidential information, and require us to incur significant expenses to address and remediate or otherwise resolve
these kinds of issues. The release of confidential information may also lead to litigation or other proceedings against us by affected
individuals, business partners and/or regulators, and the outcome of such proceedings, which could include losses, penalties, fines,
injunctions, expenses and charges recorded against our earnings and cause us reputational harm, could have a material and adverse
effect on our business and consolidated financial statements. Depending on its nature, a data security breach may result in the
unauthorized use or loss of our assets or financial resources, and such unauthorized use(s) or loss(es), which could be significant,
may not be detected for some period of time. In addition, the costs of maintaining adequate protection against data security threats,
based on considerations of their evolution, pervasiveness and frequency and/or government-mandated standards or obligations
regarding protective efforts, could be material to our consolidated financial statements in a particular period or over various periods.
Legal and Regulatory Risks
We are subject to substantial legal and regulatory requirements regarding the development of land, the homebuilding process
and the protection of the environment, which can cause us to suffer production delays and incur costs associated with
compliance, and/or prohibit or restrict homebuilding activity in some regions or areas. Our business is also subject to a number
of local, state and federal laws, statutes, ordinances, rules, policies and other legal and regulatory requirements. The impact
of such requirements or our failure to comply with such requirements, individually or collectively, could be adverse and material
to our consolidated financial statements.
Our homebuilding business is heavily regulated and subject to a significant amount of local, state and federal regulation
including, among other things, zoning, building designs, worksite health and safety and home construction methods, as well as
governmental taxes, fees and levies on the acquisition and development of land. These regulations often provide broad discretion
to government authorities that oversee these matters, which can result in unanticipated delays, restrictions, penalties for non-
compliance and/or increases in the cost of a development project in particular markets. We can provide no assurance that these
regulations will not be interpreted or revised in ways that will require us to change our present strategies or operations, incur
significant compliance costs or record charges against our earnings, have a negative impact on our reputation or our relationships
with relevant agencies or government authorities, and/or restrict the manner in which we conduct our activities. Any such actions
or events, and associated costs and charges, could adversely and materially affect our consolidated financial statements. Also,
there have been significant cuts to government departments, subsidies, programs and public employee staffing levels, limiting
economic growth and/or resulting in significant delays and/or higher costs in obtaining required inspections, permits or approvals
15
with respect to the development of our communities. These actions or events could adversely affect our ability to generate orders
and revenues and/or to maintain or increase our housing gross profit margins, and the impact could be material and adverse to our
consolidated financial statements.
In addition, we are subject to a variety of local, state and federal laws, statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning
the environment. These requirements and/or evolving interpretations thereof, may cause production delays, may cause us to incur
substantial costs, and can prohibit or restrict homebuilding activity in certain areas; any of which could also reduce the value of
the affected inventory and require us to record significant impairment charges. Environmental laws may also impose liability for
the costs of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances whether or not the developer or owner of the property knew
of, or was responsible for, the presence of those substances. The actual or potential presence of those substances on or nearby our
properties may prevent us from selling our homes and we may also be liable, under applicable laws and regulations or lawsuits
brought by private parties, for hazardous or toxic substances on land that we have sold in the past.
We are also involved in legal, arbitral or regulatory proceedings or investigations incidental to our business, the outcome or
settlement of which could result in claims, losses, monetary damage awards, penalties, or other direct or indirect payments recorded
against our earnings, or injunctions, consent decrees or other voluntary or involuntary restrictions or adjustments to our business
operations or practices. Any such adverse results could be beyond our expectations and/or accruals at particular points in time
and material to our business and consolidated financial statements. Unfavorable litigation, arbitral or administrative outcomes
may also generate negative publicity in various media outlets, including social media, websites, Internet blogs and newsletters,
that could be detrimental to our reputation and adversely affect our efforts to sell homes.
The mortgage banking operations of HCM are heavily regulated and subject to rules and regulations promulgated by a number
of governmental and quasi-governmental agencies. If there is a finding that Nationstar, which provided management oversight
of HCM’s operations, or HCM materially violated any applicable rules or regulations, or mortgage investors seek to have HCM
buy back mortgage loans or compensate them for losses incurred on mortgage loans HCM has sold based on claims that it breached
its limited representations or warranties, HCM could face significant liabilities, which could exceed its reserves and cause us to
recognize additional losses with respect to our equity interest in HCM.
Tax law changes could make home ownership more expensive or less attractive.
Under current tax law, significant expenses of owning a home, including mortgage loan interest costs and real estate taxes,
generally are deductible expenses for the purpose of calculating an individual’s or household’s federal, and in some cases state,
taxable income subject to various limitations. If the federal government or a state government changes its income tax laws by
eliminating, limiting or substantially reducing these income tax benefits, the after-tax cost of owning a home could increase
substantially. Any increases in personal income tax rates and/or tax deduction limits or restrictions enacted at the federal or state
levels could adversely impact demand for and/or selling prices of new homes, including our homes, and the effect on our consolidated
financial statements could be adverse and material.
Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
Item 2.
PROPERTIES
We lease our corporate headquarters in Los Angeles, California. Our homebuilding division offices (except for our San
Antonio, Texas office) and our design studios are located in leased space in the markets where we conduct business. We own the
premises for our San Antonio office.
We believe that such properties, including the equipment located therein, are suitable and adequate to meet the needs of our
businesses.
Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Our legal proceedings are discussed in Note 16 – Legal Matters in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this
report.
Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.
16
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The following table presents certain information regarding our executive officers as of December 31, 2016:
Name
Jeffrey T. Mezger
Nicholas S. Franklin
Jeff J. Kaminski
Albert Z. Praw
Brian J. Woram
William R. Hollinger
Thomas F. Norton
Age
61
48
55
68
56
58
46
Present Position
Year
Assumed
Present
Position
Years
at
KB
Home
Other Positions and Other
Business Experience within the
Last Five Years (a)
Chairman, President and Chief
2016
23
President and Chief Executive Officer (b)
Executive Vice President, Next Generation
Experience, Walt Disney Parks and Resorts
Worldwide, Inc. (an international family
entertainment and media enterprise)
Executive Officer (b)
Executive Vice President,
Strategic Operations
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
2015
2010
Executive Vice President, Real
2011
Estate and Business
Development
Executive Vice President and
General Counsel
Senior Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
Senior Vice President, Human
Resources
2010
2007
2009
2
6
20
6
29
8
From
– To
2006-
2016
2009-
2014
(a) All positions described were with us, unless otherwise indicated.
(b) Mr. Mezger has served as a director since 2006. He was elected Chairman of our board of directors in August 2016.
There is no family relationship between any of our executive officers or between any of our executive officers and any of
our directors.
PART II
Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
As of December 31, 2016, there were 600 holders of record of our common stock. Our common stock is traded on the New
York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “KBH.” The following table presents, for the periods indicated, the price ranges
of our common stock, and cash dividends declared and paid per share:
Year Ended November 30, 2016
Year Ended November 30, 2015
High
Low
Dividends
Declared
Dividends
Paid
High
Low
Dividends
Declared
Dividends
Paid
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
$
$
14.50
14.92
16.76
16.57
$
9.04
12.20
13.66
14.06
$
.0250
.0250
.0250
.0250
$
.0250
.0250
.0250
.0250
$
17.57
16.37
17.42
15.53
$
11.76
13.21
13.50
12.72
$
.0250
.0250
.0250
.0250
.0250
.0250
.0250
.0250
The declaration and payment of cash dividends on shares of our common stock, whether at current levels or at all, are at the
discretion of our board of directors, and depend upon, among other things, our expected future earnings, cash flows from our
operations, capital requirements, access to external financing, debt structure and adjustments thereto, covenants and other
requirements under the Credit Facility or other of our debt obligations, operational and financial investment strategy and general
financial condition, as well as general business conditions.
Information regarding the shares of our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans is provided
below in the “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters” section in
this report.
The following table summarizes our purchases of our own equity securities during the three months ended November 30,
2016:
17
Period
September 1-30
October 1-31
November 1-30
Total
Total Number of Shares
Purchased
Average Price Paid per
Share
Total Number of Shares
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced Plans
or Programs
Maximum Number of
Shares That May Yet be
Purchased Under the Plans
or Programs
— $
54,405
—
54,405
$
—
15.23
—
15.23
—
—
—
—
1,627,000
1,627,000
1,627,000
As we publicly reported, on January 12, 2016, our board of directors authorized us to repurchase a total of up to 10,000,000
shares of our outstanding common stock. As of November 30, 2016, we had repurchased 8,373,000 shares of our common stock
pursuant to this authorization, at a total cost of $85.9 million.
The shares purchased during the three months ended November 30, 2016 were previously issued shares delivered to us by
employees to satisfy withholding taxes on the vesting of restricted stock awards as well as shares forfeited by individuals upon
their termination of employment. These transactions are not considered repurchases under the board of directors’ authorization.
Stock Performance Graph
The following graph compares the five-year cumulative total return of KB Home common stock, the S&P 500 Index and the
Dow Jones US Home Construction Index for the periods ended November 30:
Comparison of Five-Year Cumulative Total Return
Among KB Home, S&P 500 Index and
Dow Jones US Home Construction Index
KB Home
S&P 500 Index
Dow Jones US Home Construction Index
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
$
$
$
100
100
100
198
116
175
$
243
151
183
$
245
177
220
$
198
182
250
224
196
220
The above graph is based on the KB Home common stock and index prices calculated as of the last trading day before
December 1 of the year-end periods presented. The closing price of KB Home common stock on the New York Stock Exchange
was $15.84 per share on November 30, 2016 and $14.09 per share on November 30, 2015. The performance of our common stock
18
as presented above reflects past performance only and is not indicative of future performance. Total return assumes $100 invested
at market close on November 30, 2011 in KB Home common stock, the S&P 500 Index and the Dow Jones US Home Construction
Index, including reinvestment of dividends.
Item 6.
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The data in this table should be read in conjunction with the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations” and “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” sections in this report.
KB HOME
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
(Dollars In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
Years Ended November 30,
Statement of Operations Data:
Revenues:
Homebuilding
Financial services
Total
Operating income (loss):
Homebuilding
Financial services
Total
Pretax income (loss)
Net income (loss) (a)
Earnings (loss) per share:
Basic
Diluted
Cash dividends declared per common share
Balance Sheet Data:
Assets:
Homebuilding
Financial services
Total
Notes payable
Stockholders’ equity
Homebuilding Data:
Net orders
Unit backlog
Homes delivered
$ 3,582,943
$ 3,020,987
$ 2,389,643
$ 2,084,978
$ 1,548,432
11,703
11,043
11,306
12,152
11,683
$ 3,594,646
$ 3,032,030
$ 2,400,949
$ 2,097,130
$ 1,560,115
152,401
$
138,621
$
115,969
$
92,084
$
7,886
7,332
7,860
9,110
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
160,287
149,315
105,615
1.23
1.12
.1000
$
$
$
145,953
127,043
84,643
.92
.85
.1000
(20,256)
8,692
(11,564)
(79,053)
(58,953)
(.76)
(.76)
$
$
$
$
$
123,829
94,949
918,349
101,194
38,363
39,963
10.26
$
9.25
.1000
.48
.46
.1000
.1375
$ 5,121,125
$ 5,072,877
$ 4,846,083
$ 3,309,558
$ 2,693,434
10,499
14,028
10,486
10,040
4,455
$ 5,131,624
$ 5,086,905
$ 4,856,569
$ 3,319,598
$ 2,697,889
$ 2,640,149
$ 2,601,754
$ 2,550,622
$ 2,125,254
$ 1,708,252
1,723,145
1,690,834
1,595,910
536,086
376,806
10,283
4,420
9,829
9,253
3,966
8,196
7,567
2,909
7,215
7,125
2,557
7,145
6,703
2,577
6,282
(a) Net income for the year ended November 30, 2014 included the impact of an $825.2 million deferred tax asset valuation
allowance reversal in the 2014 fourth quarter.
19
Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview. Revenues are generated from our homebuilding and financial services operations. The following table presents a
summary of our consolidated results of operations (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts):
Years Ended November 30,
Variance
2016
2015
2014
2016 vs 2015
2015 vs 2014
$
$
$
$
$
$
3,582,943
$
3,020,987
$
2,389,643
11,703
11,043
11,306
3,594,646
$
3,032,030
$
2,400,949
144,849
$
115,419
$
4,466
149,315
11,624
127,043
86,403
8,546
94,949
(43,700)
(42,400)
823,400
105,615
$
84,643
$
918,349
1.23
1.12
$
$
.92
.85
$
$
10.26
9.25
19%
6
19%
25%
(62)
18
(3)
25%
34%
32%
26 %
(2)
26 %
34 %
36
34
(a)
(91)%
(91)%
(91)%
Revenues:
Homebuilding
Financial services
Total
Pretax income:
Homebuilding
Financial services
Total
Income tax benefit (expense)
Net income
Earnings per share:
Basic
Diluted
(a) Percentage not meaningful.
With favorable conditions in most of our served markets, reflecting generally positive economic and employment trends, and
our steady execution on our key strategies during 2016, we significantly expanded both our revenues and earnings compared to
2015. Within our homebuilding operations, housing revenues grew 23% year over year to $3.58 billion, as the number of homes
we delivered increased 20% to 9,829 and the overall average selling price of those homes rose 3% to $363,800. Our housing gross
profit margin for 2016 decreased 10 basis points year over year to 16.2%. Our selling, general and administrative expense ratio
for 2016 improved 90 basis points year over year to 10.9% of housing revenues, reflecting enhanced operating leverage on fixed
costs due to successful cost containment efforts and corresponding higher housing revenues. Homebuilding operating income for
2016 increased 10% to $152.4 million, including total inventory-related charges of $52.8 million in 2016, compared to $9.6 million
in the year-earlier period. The year-over-year increase in total inventory-related charges was largely due to inventory impairment
charges associated with our decision in the 2016 fourth quarter to monetize certain non-strategic land parcels through land sales
as part of our returns-focused growth plan, which is described in the “Business” section of this report, and inventory impairment
and land option contract abandonment charges associated with the wind down of our Metro Washington, D.C. operations. For the
year ended November 30, 2016, we posted net income of $105.6 million, up 25% from 2015, and diluted earnings per share of
$1.12, up 32% from a year ago.
During 2016, we invested $1.36 billion in land and land development to expand the number of our community openings in
2017 and beyond. In 2015, such investments totaled $967.2 million. Approximately 46% of our total investment in 2016 related
to land acquisitions, compared to approximately 32% in the year-earlier period.
The following table presents information concerning our net orders, cancellation rate, ending backlog, and community count
for the years ended November 30, 2016 and 2015 (dollars in thousands):
20
Net orders
Net order value (a)
Cancellation rate (b)
Ending backlog — homes
Ending backlog — value
Ending community count
Average community count
Years Ended November 30,
2016
2015
10,283
9,253
$
3,813,155
$
3,255,170
25%
4,420
27%
3,966
$
1,519,089
$
1,281,478
235
238
247
244
(a) Net order value represents the potential future housing revenues associated with net orders generated during a period as well
as homebuyer selections of lot and product premiums and design studio options and upgrades for homes in backlog during
the same period.
(b) The cancellation rate represents the total number of contracts for new homes canceled during a period divided by the total
(gross) orders for new homes generated during the same period.
Net Orders. In 2016, net orders from our homebuilding operations increased 11% from 2015, despite a decrease in our average
community count. The combination of higher net orders and a higher overall average selling price resulted in the value of our
2016 net orders increasing 17% from 2015. Our cancellation rate for 2016 also showed improvement compared to the previous
year.
Backlog. The number of homes in our backlog at November 30, 2016 rose 11% from the previous year, largely due to a year-
over-year increase in our net orders in 2016. The potential future housing revenues in our backlog at November 30, 2016 grew
19% from the prior year, reflecting the larger number of homes in our backlog and the higher average selling price of those homes.
Substantially all of the homes in our backlog at November 30, 2016 are expected to be delivered during the year ending November
30, 2017.
Community Count. Our ending and average community counts for 2016 decreased 5% and 2%, respectively, each on a year-
over-year basis. The majority of these decreases occurred in our Southeast homebuilding reporting segment due to the wind down
of our Metro Washington, D.C. operations as well as fewer community openings during 2016.
In the 2016 second quarter, we announced that we had begun a transition out of the Metro Washington, D.C. market. This
transition is expected to be completed in 2017. We decided to wind down our operations in this market in order to reallocate our
resources to markets where we believe we can generate stronger returns. Our operations in the Metro Washington, D.C. market
consisted of communities in Maryland and Virginia, which are included in our Southeast homebuilding reporting segment and
represented 2% and 3% of our consolidated homebuilding revenues in 2016 and 2015, respectively. We are constructing and
delivering homes in our remaining communities in this market. We also have other land interests in this market that we intend to
build out or sell.
HOMEBUILDING
The following table presents a summary of certain financial and operational data for our homebuilding operations (dollars in
thousands, except average selling price):
21
Revenues:
Housing
Land
Total
Costs and expenses:
Construction and land costs
Housing
Land
Total
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Total
Operating income
Homes delivered
Average selling price
Years Ended November 30,
2016
2015
2014
$
3,575,548
$
2,908,236
$
2,369,633
7,395
112,751
20,010
3,582,943
3,020,987
2,389,643
(2,997,073)
(44,028)
(3,041,101)
(389,441)
(2,433,683)
(105,685)
(2,539,368)
(342,998)
(1,940,100)
(45,551)
(1,985,651)
(288,023)
(3,430,542)
(2,882,366)
(2,273,674)
$
$
152,401
9,829
363,800
$
$
138,621
8,196
354,800
$
$
115,969
7,215
328,400
Housing gross profit margin as a percentage of housing revenues
Adjusted housing gross profit margin as a percentage of housing revenues
Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of housing
revenues
Operating income as a percentage of homebuilding revenues
16.2%
21.1%
10.9%
4.3%
16.3%
21.0%
11.8%
4.6%
18.1%
22.5%
12.2%
4.9%
The following tables present homes delivered, net orders, cancellation rates, net order value, average community count, and
ending backlog (number of homes and value) by homebuilding reporting segment (dollars in thousands):
Segment
West Coast
Southwest
Central
Southeast
Total
Segment
West Coast
Southwest
Central
Southeast
Homes Delivered
Net Orders
Cancellation Rates
2016
2015
2016
2015
2016
2015
Years Ended November 30,
2,825
1,559
3,744
1,701
9,829
2,258
1,311
3,183
1,444
8,196
3,000
1,758
3,881
1,644
10,283
2,403
1,592
3,536
1,722
9,253
18%
20
30
29
25%
21%
22
33
26
27%
Net Order Value
Average Community Count
2016
2015
Variance
2016
2015
Variance
$
1,756,945
$
1,378,644
507,870
1,075,586
472,754
455,918
943,568
477,040
27%
11
14
(1)
17%
59
37
90
52
238
53
37
93
61
244
11 %
—
(3)
(15)
(2)%
Total
$
3,813,155
$
3,255,170
22
Segment
West Coast
Southwest
Central
Southeast
Total
Backlog – Homes
Backlog – Value
2016
2015
Variance
2016
2015
Variance
November 30,
913
804
1,979
724
4,420
738
605
1,842
781
3,966
24% $
526,840
$
33
7
(7)
227,822
559,172
205,255
407,972
167,425
494,836
211,245
11% $
1,519,089
$
1,281,478
29 %
36
13
(3)
19 %
Revenues. Homebuilding revenues totaled $3.58 billion in 2016, up 19% from 2015, which had increased 26% from 2014.
The year-over-year growth in our homebuilding revenues in 2016 reflected an increase in our housing revenues that was partly
offset by a decrease in revenues from land sales in the current year. In 2015, the year-over-year growth in homebuilding revenues
was driven by increases in both housing and land sale revenues.
Housing revenues in 2016 rose 23% from the previous year, reflecting a 20% increase in the number of homes delivered and
a 3% increase in the overall average selling price of those homes. In 2015, housing revenues grew 23% from 2014 due to a 14%
increase in the number of homes delivered and an 8% increase in the overall average selling price. We delivered a total of 9,829
homes in 2016, up from 8,196 in 2015. This year-over-year increase primarily reflected the 36% higher backlog of homes we had
at the beginning of 2016 as compared to the previous year and an 11% increase in our net orders during the current year. In 2015,
the number of homes delivered rose from 7,215 in 2014 mainly as a result of the 14% higher backlog of homes we had at the
beginning of 2015 and a 22% increase in our net orders during 2015.
The overall average selling price of homes delivered rose to $363,800 in 2016 from $354,800 in 2015, which had increased
from $328,400 in 2014. The year-over-year increases in our overall average selling price in both 2016 and 2015 resulted from a
strategic focus on positioning our new home communities in attractive, land-constrained locations that feature higher-income
homebuyers; higher median home selling prices; our actions to balance sales pace and selling prices within our communities to
optimize revenues and profits; and generally favorable market conditions.
Land sale revenues totaled $7.4 million in 2016, $112.8 million in 2015 and $20.0 million in 2014. The higher land sale
revenues in 2015 as compared to 2016 and 2014 reflected our execution on opportunistic transactions in each of our four
homebuilding reporting segments aligned with ongoing efforts to improve our asset efficiency. The transactions in 2015 were
mainly comprised of the sale of a large land parcel in northern California and sales of other non-strategic land parcels that had
previously been held for future development. Generally, land sale revenues fluctuate with our decisions to maintain or decrease
our land ownership position in certain markets based upon the volume of our holdings, our business strategy, the strength and
number of developers and other land buyers in particular markets at given points in time, the availability of opportunities to sell
land at acceptable prices and prevailing market conditions.
Operating Income. Our homebuilding operating income increased 10% to $152.4 million in 2016 compared to $138.6 million
in 2015, which had increased 20% from $116.0 million in 2014. As a percentage of homebuilding revenues, homebuilding operating
income was 4.3% in 2016, 4.6% in 2015 and 4.9% in 2014. The year-over-year growth in homebuilding operating income for
2016 was due to an increase in housing gross profits that was partly offset by an increase in selling, general and administrative
expenses, and land sale losses. Our homebuilding operating income included total inventory-related charges of $52.8 million in
2016, compared to $9.6 million in the year-earlier period. In 2015, the year-over-year growth in our homebuilding operating
income reflected higher housing gross profits and improved land sale results that were partly offset by higher selling, general and
administrative expenses.
In 2016, housing gross profits increased by $103.9 million, or 22%, from $474.6 million in 2015 due to the higher volume
of homes delivered, partly offset by a slight decrease in the housing gross profit margin. Housing gross profits for 2016 included
$16.2 million of inventory impairment and land option contract abandonment charges. In 2015, our housing gross profits increased
by $45.0 million, or 10%, from $429.5 million in the previous year due to the higher volume of homes delivered, partly offset by
a lower housing gross profit margin. Housing gross profits for 2015 included $9.6 million of inventory impairment and land
option contract abandonment charges, compared to $12.8 million of such charges for 2014.
Our housing gross profit margin for 2016 declined 10 basis points to 16.2% from 16.3% in the previous year, primarily due
to higher construction and land costs (approximately 20 basis points), as well as increases in both inventory-related charges
(approximately 10 basis points) and the amortization of previously capitalized interest (approximately 10 basis points), partly
offset by improved operating leverage on fixed costs as a result of our higher volume of homes delivered and corresponding higher
housing revenues (approximately 30 basis points). In 2015, the housing gross profit margin decreased by 180 basis points as
23
compared to 18.1% in 2014, primarily due to higher construction and land costs (approximately 210 basis points) and an increase
in the amortization of previously capitalized interest (approximately 60 basis points), partly offset by a decrease in inventory-
related charges (approximately 30 basis points) and improved operating leverage on fixed costs as a result of our higher volume
of homes delivered and corresponding higher housing revenues (approximately 60 basis points). Sales incentives did not have a
significant impact on our year-over-year housing gross profit margin comparisons in 2016 or 2015.
Excluding the amortization of previously capitalized interest associated with housing operations of $160.6 million, $126.8
million and $90.8 million in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and the above-mentioned inventory-related charges in the applicable
periods, our adjusted housing gross profit margin increased 10 basis points to 21.1% in 2016 from 21.0% in 2015, which had
decreased 150 basis points from 22.5% in 2014. The calculation of adjusted housing gross profit margin, which we believe provides
a clearer measure of the performance of our business, is described below under “Non-GAAP Financial Measures.”
Land sales generated losses of $36.6 million in 2016, profits of $7.1 million in 2015 and losses of $25.5 million in 2014. The
land sale results in 2016 included inventory impairment charges of $36.7 million, most of which were recognized in the fourth
quarter associated with our decision to monetize certain non-strategic land parcels through land sales as part of our returns-focused
growth plan, which is described in the “Business” section of this report. These land parcels, which were classified as land held
for sale at November 30, 2016, included land in excess of our near-term requirements; land where we now believe the necessary
incremental investment in development is not justified; land located in areas outside of our served markets; and/or land entitled
for certain product types that are not aligned with our primary product offerings. The majority of these land parcels are located
in our Southeast homebuilding reporting segment. We also recorded inventory impairment charges in the 2016 second quarter
associated with the planned future sales of two land parcels in the Metro Washington, D.C. market as a result of our decision to
wind down our operations in this market, and in the 2016 first quarter related to the sales of our last remaining land parcels in the
Rio Grande Valley area of Texas that closed in the second quarter. The land sale results in 2014 included inventory impairment
charges of $26.6 million related to then-planned land sales, all of which had closed as of November 30, 2015.
As discussed in Note 7 – Inventory Impairments and Land Option Contract Abandonments in the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements in this report, we recognized total inventory impairment charges (including those associated with the above-
mentioned land sales) of $49.6 million in 2016, $8.0 million in 2015 and $37.6 million in 2014, and land option contract
abandonment charges of $3.2 million in 2016, $1.6 million in 2015 and $1.8 million in 2014.
Selling, general and administrative expenses totaled $389.4 million in 2016, up from $343.0 million in 2015, which had
increased from $288.0 million in 2014. The year-over-year increases in selling, general and administrative expenses in 2016 and
2015 mainly reflected higher variable expenses associated with the increases in the volume of homes delivered and corresponding
housing revenues. Also contributing to the year-over-year increase in 2015 were higher staffing levels and new community and
related operating platform investments to support both the strategic expansion of our community count that year and anticipated
growth in homes delivered, the acceleration of compensation expense associated with stock options due to certain recipients
meeting retirement provisions, and legal settlements. As a percentage of housing revenues, selling, general and administrative
expenses were 10.9% in 2016, 11.8% in 2015 and 12.2% in 2014. The percentages improved on a year-over-year basis in both
2016 and 2015 largely due to improved operating leverage on fixed costs from the increased volume of homes delivered and
corresponding higher housing revenues in each of those years and our ongoing efforts to contain our overhead costs to the extent
possible.
Interest Income. Interest income, which is generated from short-term investments, totaled $.5 million in each of 2016 and
2015 and $.4 million in 2014. Generally, increases and decreases in interest income are attributable to changes in the interest-
bearing average balances of short-term investments and fluctuations in interest rates.
Interest Expense. Interest expense results principally from our borrowings to finance land acquisitions, land development,
home construction and other operating and capital needs. Our interest expense, net of amounts capitalized, decreased to $5.9
million in 2016 compared to $21.9 million in 2015, which had decreased from $30.8 million in 2014. In 2016, the year-over-year
decrease in interest expense reflected a slight decrease in interest incurred and an increase in the amount of interest capitalized
due to a higher amount of inventory qualifying for interest capitalization in the current year. In 2015, interest expense decreased
on a year-over-year basis as an increase in interest incurred, stemming from our higher average debt level, was more than offset
by an increase in the amount of interest capitalized due to a higher amount of inventory qualifying for interest capitalization.
For the years ended November 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the average amount of our inventory qualifying for interest
capitalization was lower than our average debt level; therefore, a portion of the interest we incurred was reflected as interest
expense. In both 2016 and 2015, the amount of inventory qualifying for interest capitalization increased more than our debt level
increased, each as compared to the previous year, primarily as a result of our substantial investment in land and land development
as well as the activation of land previously held for future development in each of those years. Accordingly, our interest expense
decreased on a year-over-year basis in both 2016 and 2015.
24
Interest incurred decreased 1% to $185.5 million in 2016 from $186.9 million in 2015, which rose 9% from $171.5 million
in 2014. The amount of interest incurred generally fluctuates based on the average amount of debt outstanding for the period and/
or the interest rate on that debt. We capitalized $179.6 million, $165.0 million and $140.8 million of the interest incurred in 2016,
2015 and 2014, respectively. The percentage of interest capitalized was 97% in 2016, 88% in 2015 and 82% in 2014. The
percentage of interest capitalized generally fluctuates based on the amount of our inventory qualifying for interest capitalization
and the amount of debt outstanding.
Interest amortized to construction and land costs associated with housing operations totaled $160.6 million in 2016, $126.8
million in 2015 and $90.8 million in 2014. The increases in interest amortized in 2016 and 2015 reflected year-over-year increases
in the number of homes delivered and higher overall construction and land costs attributable to those homes. As a percentage of
housing revenues, the amortization of previously capitalized interest associated with housing operations was 4.5% for 2016, 4.4%
for 2015 and 3.8% for 2014. Additionally, interest amortized to construction and land costs in 2016 and 2015 included $.7 million
and $16.4 million, respectively, of amortization of previously capitalized interest related to land sales that occurred during those
years.
Equity in Income (Loss) of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures. Our equity in loss of unconsolidated joint ventures totaled $2.2
million in 2016 and $1.8 million in 2015. In 2014, our equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures of $.7 million included
a $3.2 million gain on the sale of our interest in an unconsolidated joint venture in Maryland. Further information regarding our
investments in unconsolidated joint ventures is provided in Note 9 – Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures in the Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
This report contains information about our adjusted housing gross profit margin and ratio of net debt to capital, neither of
which are calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). We believe these non-GAAP financial
measures are relevant and useful to investors in understanding our operations and the leverage employed in our operations, and
may be helpful in comparing us with other companies in the homebuilding industry to the extent they provide similar information.
However, because the adjusted housing gross profit margin and the ratio of net debt to capital are not calculated in accordance
with GAAP, these financial measures may not be completely comparable to other companies in the homebuilding industry and
thus, should not be considered in isolation or as an alternative to operating performance and/or financial measures prescribed by
GAAP. Rather, these non-GAAP financial measures should be used to supplement their respective most directly comparable
GAAP financial measures in order to provide a greater understanding of the factors and trends affecting our operations.
Adjusted Housing Gross Profit Margin. The following table reconciles our housing gross profit margin calculated in accordance
with GAAP to the non-GAAP financial measure of our adjusted housing gross profit margin (dollars in thousands):
Housing revenues
Housing construction and land costs
Housing gross profits
Add: Amortization of previously capitalized interest (a)
Inventory-related charges (b)
Adjusted housing gross profits
Years Ended November 30,
2016
2015
2014
$
3,575,548
(2,997,073)
$
2,908,236
(2,433,683)
$
2,369,633
(1,940,100)
578,475
160,633
16,152
474,553
126,817
9,591
429,533
90,804
12,788
$
755,260
$
610,961
$
533,125
Housing gross profit margin as a percentage of housing revenues
Adjusted housing gross profit margin as a percentage of housing revenues
16.2%
21.1%
16.3%
21.0%
18.1%
22.5%
(a) Represents the amortization of previously capitalized interest associated with housing operations.
(b) Represents inventory impairment and land option contract abandonment charges associated with housing operations.
Adjusted housing gross profit margin is a non-GAAP financial measure, which we calculate by dividing housing revenues
less housing construction and land costs excluding (1) amortization of previously capitalized interest associated with housing
operations and (2) housing inventory impairment and land option contract abandonment charges (as applicable) recorded during
a given period, by housing revenues. The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is housing gross profit margin. We
believe adjusted housing gross profit margin is a relevant and useful financial measure to investors in evaluating our performance
25
as it measures the gross profits we generated specifically on the homes delivered during a given period. This non-GAAP financial
measure isolates the impact that the amortization of previously capitalized interest associated with housing operations, and housing
inventory impairment and land option contract abandonment charges, have on housing gross profit margins, and allows investors
to make comparisons with our competitors that adjust housing gross profit margins in a similar manner. We also believe investors
will find adjusted housing gross profit margin relevant and useful because it represents a profitability measure that may be compared
to a prior period without regard to variability of amortization of previously capitalized interest associated with housing operations,
and housing inventory impairment and land option contract abandonment charges. This financial measure assists us in making
strategic decisions regarding community location and product mix, product pricing and construction pace.
Ratio of Net Debt to Capital. The following table reconciles our ratio of debt to capital calculated in accordance with GAAP
to the non-GAAP financial measure of our ratio of net debt to capital (dollars in thousands):
Notes payable
Stockholders’ equity
Total capital
Ratio of debt to capital
Notes payable
Less: Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash
Net debt
Stockholders’ equity
Total capital
Ratio of net debt to capital
November 30,
2016
2015
$
2,640,149
$
2,601,754
1,723,145
1,690,834
$
4,363,294
$
4,292,588
60.5%
60.6%
$
2,640,149
(592,086)
$
2,601,754
(568,386)
2,048,063
1,723,145
2,033,368
1,690,834
$
3,771,208
$
3,724,202
54.3%
54.6%
The ratio of net debt to capital is a non-GAAP financial measure, which we calculate by dividing notes payable, net of
homebuilding cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash, by capital (notes payable, net of homebuilding cash and cash equivalents
and restricted cash, plus stockholders’ equity). The most directly comparable GAAP financial measure is the ratio of debt to
capital. We believe the ratio of net debt to capital is a relevant and useful financial measure to investors in understanding the
leverage employed in our operations.
HOMEBUILDING REPORTING SEGMENTS
Below is a discussion of the financial results of each of our homebuilding reporting segments. Further information regarding
these segments, including their pretax income (loss), is included in Note 2 – Segment Information in the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements in this report. The difference between each homebuilding reporting segment’s operating income (loss) and
pretax income (loss) is generally due to the equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures, which is also presented in
Note 2 – Segment Information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report, and/or interest income and expense.
West Coast. The following table presents financial information related to our West Coast homebuilding reporting segment
for the years indicated (dollars in thousands, except average selling price):
26
Years Ended November 30,
Variance
2016
2015
2014
2016 vs 2015
2015 vs 2014
Revenues
Construction and land costs
Selling, general and administrative
$
1,638,078
$
(1,386,270)
1,402,264
(1,179,222)
$
1,089,857
(889,345)
expenses
Operating income
Homes delivered
Average selling price
(100,425)
(84,875)
(69,774)
151,383
$
138,167
$
130,738
2,825
2,258
1,913
579,900
$
587,000
$
569,700
$
$
17 %
29 %
(18)
(18)
10 %
25 %
(1) %
(33)
(22)
6 %
18 %
3 %
Housing gross profit margin
15.4%
16.4%
20.5%
(100)bps
(410)bps
This segment’s revenues in 2016 and 2014 were generated entirely from housing operations. In 2015, revenues were generated
from both housing operations and land sales. Housing revenues of $1.64 billion in 2016 grew 24% from $1.33 billion in 2015,
which had increased from $1.09 billion in 2014. The year-over-year growth in housing revenues in 2016 reflected an increase in
the number of homes delivered primarily from our southern California operations, stemming from the higher backlog of homes
at the beginning of 2016 and a higher volume of net orders in the current year. The 2016 average selling price decreased slightly
from the previous year due to a shift in product and geographic mix, with a greater proportion of homes delivered from communities
located in our inland submarkets. In 2015, housing revenues increased 22% from 2014 due to an increase in the number of homes
delivered and an increase in the average selling price of those homes. The year-over-year increase in the number of homes delivered
in 2015 occurred mostly in our coastal submarkets and reflected the higher backlog of homes at the beginning of 2015. The
average selling price for 2015 rose from the previous year due to the combination of a greater proportion of homes delivered from
higher-priced communities located in our coastal submarkets, a shift in product mix, and generally rising home prices. This
segment generated land sale revenues of $76.8 million in 2015, primarily reflecting sales of a large parcel in northern California
and a parcel located in an inland southern California submarket.
In 2016, this segment’s operating income increased by $13.2 million from the previous year, reflecting an increase in housing
gross profits that was partly offset by a decline in land sale results and higher selling, general and administrative expenses. The
increase in housing gross profits reflected a higher volume of homes delivered, partly offset by a decline in the housing gross
profit margin. The year-over-year decrease in the housing gross profit margin was mainly due to an increase in inventory impairment
and land option contract abandonment charges, higher construction and land costs and a shift in product and geographic mix of
homes delivered. Inventory-related charges impacting the segment’s housing gross profit margin totaled $8.4 million in 2016,
compared to $1.0 million in 2015. Land sale losses of $.6 million in 2016 reflected inventory impairment charges related to land
held for sale. In 2015, land sales generated profits of $6.2 million. Selling, general and administrative expenses for 2016 rose
from the previous year, primarily due to higher variable expenses associated with the increased volume of homes delivered and
corresponding higher housing revenues.
In 2015, operating income increased by $7.4 million from 2014, reflecting improved land sale results, partly offset by an
increase in selling, general and administrative expenses and a decrease in housing gross profits. The year-over-year decrease in
housing gross profits in 2015 reflected a decline in the housing gross profit margin, partly offset by the impact of an increase in
the number of homes delivered. The housing gross profit margin decreased mainly due to higher construction and land costs, a
shift in product and geographic mix, including the close-out of certain higher-margin communities in the latter part of 2014, and
increased pricing pressures in some markets, partly offset by increased operating leverage on fixed costs as a result of the higher
home delivery volume and corresponding higher housing revenues. Inventory impairment and land option contract abandonment
charges impacting the segment’s housing gross profit margin totaled $1.0 million in 2015 and $4.6 million in 2014. Land sales
produced profits in 2015, compared to losses of $23.2 million in 2014 that reflected an inventory impairment charge related to
the then-planned sale of the inland southern California land parcel noted above, and as further described in Note 7 – Inventory
Impairments and Land Option Contract Abandonments in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report. Selling,
general and administrative expenses for 2015 rose from 2014 primarily due to increased variable expenses associated with the
increases in both the number of homes delivered and corresponding housing revenues, and higher staffing levels to support delivery
growth.
Southwest. The following table presents financial information related to our Southwest homebuilding reporting segment for
the years indicated (dollars in thousands, except average selling price):
27
Years Ended November 30,
Variance
2016
2015
2014
2016 vs 2015
2015 vs 2014
Revenues
Construction and land costs
Selling, general and administrative
$
447,473
$
(371,509)
398,242
(329,203)
$
199,504
(162,560)
expenses
Operating income
Homes delivered
Average selling price
(35,786)
(31,228)
(22,069)
40,178
$
37,811
$
14,875
1,559
1,311
736
287,000
$
284,600
$
271,100
$
$
12 %
(13)
(15)
6 %
19 %
1 %
Housing gross profit margin
17.4%
18.4%
18.5%
(100)bps
100 %
(103)
(42)
154 %
78 %
5 %
(10)bps
In 2016 and 2014, this segment’s revenues were generated entirely from housing operations. In 2015, revenues were generated
from both housing operations and land sales. Housing revenues of $447.5 million in 2016 grew 20% from the previous year,
primarily due to substantial year-over-year growth in the number of homes delivered from both our Arizona and Nevada operations.
Housing revenues of $373.1 million for 2015 rose 87% from 2014, largely driven by increases in the number of homes delivered
from both our Arizona and Nevada operations as we delivered homes from more communities in those markets. In addition, the
average selling price of the homes delivered increased from the previous year, primarily due to a shift in the product and geographic
mix of homes delivered. In 2015, revenues included $25.2 million associated with land sales in Nevada.
In 2016, operating income from this segment grew $2.4 million from 2015, reflecting an increase in housing gross profits
that was partly offset by an increase in selling, general and administrative expenses and land sale losses in the current period.
Housing gross profits increased in 2016 primarily due to the higher volume of homes delivered, partly offset by a decrease in the
housing gross profit margin. The margin decrease resulted from higher construction and land costs and a shift in product mix,
partially offset by improved operating leverage on fixed costs from the increased volume of homes delivered, a decrease in
inventory-related charges, and a decrease in sales incentives as a percentage of housing revenues. Housing gross profits in 2016
included $1.5 million of inventory impairment and land option contract abandonment charges, compared to $3.3 million of inventory
impairment charges in 2015. Land sale losses of $1.9 million in 2016 reflected inventory impairment charges related to land held
for sale at November 30, 2016. In 2015, land sales produced gross profits of $.3 million. Selling, general and administrative
expenses for 2016 rose from the previous year, primarily due to higher variable expenses associated with the increased volume
of homes delivered and corresponding higher housing revenues, partly offset by a favorable legal settlement in 2016.
In 2015, operating income rose $22.9 million from the previous year as the impact of an increase in housing gross profits was
partly offset by an increase in selling, general and administrative expenses. Housing gross profits increased in 2015 primarily due
to the higher volume of homes delivered as the housing gross profit margin was nearly even with 2014. In 2015, housing gross
profits included $3.3 million of inventory impairment charges, while housing gross profits in 2014 included $6.4 million of such
charges. Sales incentives as a percentage of housing revenues in 2015 were slightly lower on a year-over-year basis. The land
sale activity in 2015 generated gross profits of $.3 million. Selling, general and administrative expenses rose in 2015 from 2014,
primarily due to increases in the number of homes delivered and corresponding housing revenues, and higher community opening-
related expenses in connection with the strategic expansion of our community count in 2015.
Central. The following table presents financial information related to our Central homebuilding reporting segment for the
years indicated (dollars in thousands, except average selling price):
Years Ended November 30,
Variance
2016
2015
2014
2016 vs 2015
2015 vs 2014
Revenues
Construction and land costs
Selling, general and administrative
expenses
$
1,018,535
$
(830,368)
809,738
(657,316)
$
698,429
(578,711)
(102,300)
(82,400)
(72,742)
Operating income
$
85,867
$
70,022
$
46,976
26 %
(26)
(24)
23 %
16 %
(14)
(13)
49 %
28
Years Ended November 30,
Variance
2016
2015
2014
2016 vs 2015
2015 vs 2014
Homes delivered
Average selling price
3,744
3,183
3,098
$
270,100
$
252,200
$
223,800
Housing gross profit margin
19.6%
19.0%
17.2%
18 %
7 %
60bps
3 %
13 %
180bps
In 2016, 2015 and 2014, revenues for this segment were generated from both housing operations and land sales. Housing
revenues in 2016 rose 26% to $1.01 billion from $802.6 million in 2015, reflecting increases in both the number of homes delivered
and the average selling price of those homes. The year-over-year growth in the number of homes delivered in 2016 reflected
increases from both our Colorado and Texas operations. The average selling price rose from 2015, primarily due to a greater
proportion of homes delivered from higher-priced communities, a shift in product mix and generally rising home prices. In 2015,
housing revenues rose 16% from $693.3 million in 2014 due to increases in both the number of homes delivered and the average
selling price of those homes. The year-over-year growth in the number of homes delivered for 2015 primarily reflected an increase
in our Colorado operations as a result of a higher number of communities within those operations delivering homes. The increase
in the average selling price from 2014 was mainly due to a greater proportion of homes delivered from higher-priced communities
and generally rising home prices. Land sale revenues totaled $7.3 million in 2016, $7.1 million in 2015 and $5.2 million in 2014.
The operating income generated by this segment in 2016 increased $15.8 million from 2015, primarily due to growth in
housing gross profits that was partly offset by an increase in selling, general and administrative expenses and land sale losses in
the current year. The year-over-year growth in housing gross profits reflected the increased volume of homes delivered and
improvement in our housing gross profit margin. The housing gross profit margin for 2016 improved on a year-over-year basis
largely due to improved operating leverage on fixed costs and lower overall construction and land costs, partly offset by unfavorable
warranty adjustments. Land sale losses totaled $10.5 million in 2016, primarily due to inventory impairment charges related to
land held for sale at November 30, 2016 and the sales of our last remaining parcels in the Rio Grande Valley area of Texas, both
as further described in Note 7 – Inventory Impairments and Land Option Contract Abandonments in the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements in this report. Selling, general and administrative expenses for 2016 rose from 2015, mainly due to higher
variable expenses associated with the increased volume of homes delivered and corresponding higher housing revenues, and an
increase to a legal accrual, partly offset by lower overhead costs as a result of our cost containment efforts.
In 2015, operating income improved by $23.0 million from 2014, reflecting higher housing gross profits, partly offset by
higher selling, general and administrative expenses. The housing gross profit margin increased to 19.0% from 17.2% for 2014,
mainly due to an increased proportion of homes delivered from higher-margin communities, and improved operating leverage on
fixed costs from the increased volume of homes delivered and corresponding higher housing revenues. Housing gross profits
included $.2 million of land option contract abandonment charges in 2015, compared to $1.0 million of such charges included in
2014. Land sale activity in 2015 generated nominal profits. The year-over-year increase in selling, general and administrative
expenses for 2015 was primarily due to higher variable expenses associated with the increase in housing revenues.
Southeast. The following table presents financial information related to our Southeast homebuilding reporting segment for
the years indicated (dollars in thousands, except average selling price):
Years Ended November 30,
Variance
2016
2015
2014
2016 vs 2015
2015 vs 2014
$
478,857
$
(446,539)
410,743
(367,668)
$
401,853
(351,634)
(58,361)
(57,552)
(54,412)
17 %
(21)
(1)
2 %
(5)
(6)
(26,043)
$
(14,477)
$
(4,193)
(80) %
(245) %
Revenues
Construction and land costs
Selling, general and administrative
expenses
Operating loss
Homes delivered
Average selling price
$
$
Housing gross profit margin
11.7%
10.4%
13.6%
1,701
281,400
$
1,444
281,900
$
1,468
263,600
18 %
— %
130bps
(2) %
7 %
(320)bps
This segment’s revenues in 2016, 2015 and 2014 were comprised of revenues from both housing operations and land sales.
Housing revenues in 2016 grew 18% to $478.7 million from $407.1 million in 2015. The year-over-year growth in housing
revenues in 2016 was due to increases in the number of homes delivered, as the average selling price was essentially flat year over
29
year. The growth in the number of homes delivered for 2016, compared to the year earlier period, was attributable to our Florida
operations. In 2015, housing revenues grew 5% from $387.0 million in 2014 due to an increase in the average selling price, as
the number of homes delivered was nearly flat with the year-earlier period. The year-over-year increase in the average selling
price for 2015 was primarily due to a greater proportion of homes delivered from higher-priced communities, a change in product
mix and generally rising home prices. This segment generated land sale revenues of $.1 million, $3.6 million and $14.8 million
in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
In 2016, this segment’s operating results declined $11.6 million, reflecting land sale losses and a slight increase in selling,
general and administrative expenses that were partially offset by an increase in housing gross profits. The growth in this segment’s
housing gross profits was due to the increase in the number of homes delivered and an improvement in the housing gross profit
margin. The housing gross profit margin increased on a year-over-year basis primarily due to improved operating leverage on
fixed costs from the increased volume of homes delivered and corresponding higher housing revenues, and lower construction
and land costs, partly offset by an increase in inventory-related charges. In 2016, inventory-related charges impacting the housing
gross profit margin totaled $5.8 million and were largely related to the wind down of our Metro Washington, D.C. operations. In
2015, the housing gross profit margin was impacted by $5.1 million of inventory impairment and land option contract abandonment
charges. Land sale losses totaled $23.6 million for 2016, compared to land sale profits of $.6 million for the previous year, primarily
due to inventory impairment charges associated with the land held for sale at November 30, 2016, including two land parcels in
the Metro Washington, D.C. area that we plan to sell in connection with the wind down of our operations in this market, as further
described in Note 7 – Inventory Impairments and Land Option Contract Abandonments in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements in this report. In 2016, selling, general and administrative expenses rose from the previous year primarily due to higher
variable expenses associated with the increase in housing revenues and a legal accrual. In 2015, selling general and administrative
expenses included an increase in the accrual for a Florida legal inquiry that was resolved in February 2016, as further described
in Note 15 – Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
In 2015, the operating loss increased by $10.3 million from 2014 as a result of a decrease in housing gross profits and an
increase in selling, general and administrative expenses. These impacts were partly offset by a year-over-year improvement in
land sale results. The year-over-year decrease in housing gross profits reflected a decline in the housing gross profit margin
primarily due to the combined impact of higher land and construction costs, lower margins on homes delivered from recently
activated communities that were previously held for future development, $5.1 million of inventory impairment and land option
contract abandonment charges, and unfavorable warranty adjustments in 2015. In addition, sales incentives as a percentage of
housing revenues in 2015 were slightly higher on a year-over-year basis. In 2014, inventory impairment and land option contract
abandonment charges impacting this segment’s housing gross profit margin totaled $.8 million. Land sale profits were $.6 million
in 2015, compared to land sale losses of $2.6 million in 2014, which included an inventory impairment charge of $3.4 million
related to the then-planned land sale of our last remaining land parcel in Atlanta, Georgia. Selling, general and administrative
expenses rose from 2014, primarily due to increased variable expenses associated with the increase in housing revenues, higher
overhead costs to support new community openings, and the above-mentioned increase in the accrual for the estimated minimum
probable loss with respect to a Florida legal inquiry that has since been resolved.
FINANCIAL SERVICES REPORTING SEGMENT
The following table presents a summary of selected financial and operational data for our financial services reporting segment
(dollars in thousands):
Revenues
Expenses
Equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures
Pretax income
Years Ended November 30,
2016
2015
2014
$
$
$
11,703
(3,817)
(3,420)
$
11,043
(3,711)
4,292
11,306
(3,446)
686
4,466
$
11,624
$
8,546
30
Total originations (a):
Loans
Principal
Percentage of homebuyers using HCM
Average FICO score
Loans sold (a):
Loans sold to Nationstar
Principal
Loans sold to other third parties
Principal
Mortgage loan origination mix (a):
Conventional/non-conventional loans
FHA loans
Other government loans
Loan type (a):
Fixed
ARM
Years Ended November 30,
2016
2015
2014
3,320
4,460
1,501
$
847,905
$
1,132,479
$
374,263
37%
713
62%
718
61%
716
3,730
966,155
234
47,936
4,168
1,055,551
161
38,608
$
$
$
$
1,035
252,583
—
—
$
$
43%
38%
19%
100%
—%
45%
38%
17%
98%
2%
52%
26%
22%
91%
9%
(a) Loan originations and sales occurred within HCM, which began operations in July 2014. In the 2016 fourth quarter, we and
Nationstar began the process to wind down HCM and transfer HCM’s operations and certain assets to Stearns Lending, LLC
(“Stearns Lending”).
Revenues. Our financial services reporting segment generates revenues primarily from insurance commissions and title
services. These operations also earned marketing services fees, pursuant to a marketing services agreement with a preferred lender,
until July 2014. The year-over-year growth in our financial services revenues for 2016 reflected an increase in title services
revenues, partly offset by a decrease in insurance commissions. In 2015, the year-over-year decrease in our financial services
revenues was due to the absence of marketing services revenues, which was largely offset by an increase in insurance commissions
and title services revenues. In 2014, marketing services fees totaled $1.1 million and represented the fair value of the services we
provided in connection with the marketing services agreement.
Expenses. General and administrative expenses totaled $3.8 million in 2016, $3.7 million in 2015 and $3.4 million in 2014.
Equity in Income (Loss) of Unconsolidated Joint Ventures. The equity in loss of unconsolidated joint ventures was $3.4 million
in 2016, compared to equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures of $4.3 million in 2015 and $.7 million in 2014. The
equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures for each of the years ended November 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014 was
primarily related to HCM. The equity in loss of unconsolidated joint ventures in 2016 reflected fewer loan originations and higher
overhead costs as well as the wind down of HCM, which, as noted above, began in the 2016 fourth quarter, and included an increase
in HCM’s reserves for potential future losses on certain loans it originated. While we believe we will not need to record any
additional charges, it is reasonably possible that we may incur further losses with respect to our equity interest in future periods
as the wind down of HCM is completed. Although we are currently unable to estimate the amount or range of such losses, if any,
we believe they would not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In the 2016 fourth quarter, a subsidiary of ours and a subsidiary of Stearns Lending entered into an agreement to form a
mortgage banking joint venture in which we each have a 50.0% ownership interest. The unconsolidated joint venture, which had
no impact on our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended November 30, 2016, is expected to begin offering services,
including mortgage loan originations, to our homebuyers in most of our served markets by the end of our 2017 second quarter,
subject to obtaining all requisite regulatory approvals and clearances.
Based on the number of homes delivered in 2016, approximately 37% of our homebuyers who obtained mortgage financing
used HCM to finance the purchase of their home, compared to approximately 62% that used HCM in 2015 and approximately
61% that used HCM or Nationstar in 2014. The year-over-year decrease in 2016 was primarily due to HCM’s transition to a new
31
loan origination system that limited its ability to originate certain loans, insufficient staffing in certain markets, and its wind down.
The year-over-year decrease in the percentage of homebuyers that used HCM did not have a significant impact on our orders,
cancellation rate or the number of homes we delivered in 2016.
INCOME TAXES
Income Tax Expense. Our income tax expense and effective income tax rate were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Income tax expense (benefit)
Effective income tax rate
(a) Percentage not meaningful.
Years Ended November 30,
2016
2015
2014
$
43,700
$
42,400
$
29.3%
33.4%
(823,400)
(a)
Our income tax expense for 2016 and 2015 reflected the favorable net impact of $15.2 million and $5.6 million, respectively,
of federal energy tax credits we earned from building energy-efficient homes. The income tax benefit in 2014 was primarily due
to the reversal of a substantial portion of our deferred tax asset valuation allowance at November 30, 2014. Due to the effects of
our deferred tax asset valuation allowance and changes in our unrecognized tax benefits, our effective tax rate in 2014 was not
meaningful as our income tax amount was not directly correlated to the amount of our pretax income for that period. The majority
of the federal energy tax credits for 2016 resulted from legislation enacted in 2015 that extended the availability of a business tax
credit for building new energy-efficient homes through December 31, 2016. There has been no new legislation enacted extending
the business tax credit beyond December 31, 2016.
At November 30, 2016 and 2015, we had deferred tax assets of $763.8 million and $820.0 million, respectively, that were
partially offset by valuation allowances of $24.8 million and $37.8 million, respectively. The valuation allowance at November
30, 2016 was primarily related to certain state NOLs that had not met the “more likely than not” realization standard at that date.
The valuation allowance at November 30, 2015 was mainly related to foreign tax credits and certain state NOLs that had not met
the “more likely than not” realization standard at that date. We evaluated our deferred tax assets as of November 30, 2016 and
2015 to determine whether any adjustment to our deferred tax asset valuation allowance was necessary. We determined that most
of our deferred tax assets as of November 30, 2016 and 2015 would be realized. We reduced our valuation allowance by $13.0
million in 2016 to account for the expiration of foreign tax credits, the release of valuation allowance associated with state NOLs
that met the “more likely than not” realization standard and the establishment of a valuation allowance for state NOLs related to
the wind down of our Metro Washington, D.C. operations. In 2015, the valuation allowance was reduced by $3.4 million to account
for the expiration of foreign tax credits and state NOLs that were not utilized.
Further information regarding our income taxes is provided in Note 12 – Income Taxes in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements in this report.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Overview. We have funded our homebuilding and financial services activities over the last several years with:
•
•
•
•
•
internally generated cash flows;
public issuances of our common stock;
public issuances of debt securities;
land option contracts and other similar contracts and seller notes; and
letters of credit and performance bonds.
We also have the ability to borrow funds under the Credit Facility. We manage our use of cash in the operation of our business
to support the execution of our primary strategic goals. Over the past several years, we have primarily used cash for:
•
•
•
•
•
land acquisitions and land development;
home construction;
operating expenses;
principal and interest payments on notes payable; and
cash collateral.
32
In the 2016 first quarter, we used $85.9 million in cash to repurchase 8,373,000 shares of our outstanding common stock
pursuant to a board of directors’ authorization, as further discussed below.
Our investments in land and land development totaled approximately $1.36 billion in 2016, $967.2 million in 2015 and $1.47
billion in 2014. Approximately 46% of our total investments in 2016 related to land acquisitions, compared to approximately 32%
in 2015 and approximately 54% in 2014. While we made strategic investments in land and land development in each of our
homebuilding reporting segments in each of these years, approximately 64% in 2016, 51% in 2015 and 56% in 2014, were made
in our West Coast homebuilding reporting segment. Our investments in land and land development in the future will depend
significantly on market conditions and available opportunities that meet our investment return standards for home delivery growth
in 2017 and beyond.
The following table presents the number of lots and carrying value of inventory we owned or controlled under land option
contracts and other similar contracts by homebuilding reporting segment (dollars in thousands):
Segment
West Coast
Southwest
Central
Southeast
Total
November 30, 2016
November 30, 2015
Variance
Lots
$
Lots
$
Lots
$
10,904
$
1,726,740
11,420
$
1,602,356
8,338
18,272
7,311
522,320
769,237
384,931
8,981
17,747
9,251
534,040
707,210
470,141
(516) $
(643)
525
(1,940)
124,384
(11,720)
62,027
(85,210)
44,825
$
3,403,228
47,399
$
3,313,747
(2,574) $
89,481
The carrying value of lots owned or controlled under land option and other similar contracts at November 30, 2016 increased
from November 30, 2015 primarily due to the investments in land and land development we made during 2016. Overall, the number
of lots we controlled under land option contracts and other similar contracts as a percentage of total lots was 21% at November 30,
2016 and 20% at November 30, 2015. Generally, this percentage fluctuates with our decisions to control (or abandon) lots under
land option contracts and other similar contracts or to purchase (or sell owned) lots based on available opportunities and our
investment return standards.
We ended our 2016 fiscal year with $592.1 million of cash and cash equivalents, compared to $568.4 million at November 30,
2015. The majority of our cash and cash equivalents at November 30, 2016 were invested in interest-bearing bank deposit accounts.
The majority of our cash and cash equivalents at November 30, 2015 were invested in money market funds and interest-bearing
bank deposit accounts. At November 30, 2015, we also had restricted cash of $9.3 million.
Capital Resources. Our notes payable consisted of the following (in thousands):
Mortgages and land contracts due to land sellers and other loans
Senior notes
Convertible senior notes
Total
November 30,
2016
2015
Variance
$
$
66,927
2,345,843
227,379
$
35,664
2,339,920
226,170
$
2,640,149
$
2,601,754
$
31,263
5,923
1,209
38,395
On December 14, 2016, we elected to exercise our optional redemption rights under the terms of our 9.10% Senior Notes due
2017, which mature on September 15, 2017. On January 13, 2017, we redeemed $100.0 million in aggregate principal amount of
the notes outstanding at the redemption price calculated in accordance with the “make-whole” provisions of the notes. We used
internally generated cash to fund this redemption. Upon this redemption, $165.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the notes
remained outstanding. In connection with this early extinguishment of debt, we will recognize a charge of approximately $5.4
million in the 2017 first quarter.
Our financial leverage, as measured by the ratio of debt to capital, was 60.5% at November 30, 2016, compared to 60.6% at
November 30, 2015. Our ratio of net debt to capital (a calculation that is described above under “Non-GAAP Financial Measures”)
at November 30, 2016 was 54.3%, compared to 54.6% at November 30, 2015.
LOC Facility. We had no letters of credit outstanding under the LOC Facility at November 30, 2016, compared to $9.1 million
of such letters of credit outstanding at November 30, 2015. The LOC Facility requires us to deposit and maintain cash with the
33
issuing financial institution as collateral for our letters of credit outstanding. The amount of cash maintained for our LOC Facility
totaled $9.3 million at November 30, 2015, and was included in restricted cash in our consolidated balance sheet as of that date.
Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility. We have a $275.0 million Credit Facility that will mature on August 7, 2019. The amount
of our Credit Facility available for cash borrowings and the issuance of letters of credit depends on the total cash borrowings and
letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Facility and the maximum available amount under the terms of the Credit Facility. As
of November 30, 2016, we had no cash borrowings and $31.0 million of letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Facility.
Therefore, as of November 30, 2016, we had $244.0 million available for cash borrowings under the Credit Facility, with up to
$106.5 million of that amount available for the issuance of additional letters of credit. The Credit Facility is further described in
Note 13 – Notes Payable in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
Under the terms of the Credit Facility, we are required, among other things, to maintain compliance with various covenants,
including financial covenants regarding our consolidated tangible net worth, consolidated leverage ratio (“Leverage Ratio”), and
either a consolidated interest coverage ratio (“Interest Coverage Ratio”) or minimum liquidity level, each as defined therein. Our
compliance with these financial covenants is measured by calculations and metrics that are specifically defined or described by the
terms of the Credit Facility and can differ in certain respects from comparable GAAP or other commonly used terms. The financial
covenant requirements are set forth below:
• Consolidated Tangible Net Worth. We must maintain a minimum consolidated tangible net worth at the end of any fiscal
quarter equal to the sum of (a) $1.13 billion, plus (b) an amount equal to 50% of the aggregate of the cumulative consolidated
net income for each fiscal quarter commencing after May 31, 2015 and ending as of the last day of such fiscal quarter
(though there is no reduction if there is a consolidated net loss in any fiscal quarter), plus (c) an amount equal to 50% of
the cumulative net proceeds we receive from the issuance of our capital stock after May 31, 2015.
•
•
Leverage Ratio. We were required to maintain a Leverage Ratio of less than or equal to .700 for the 2016 fourth quarter.
This requirement adjusts to less than or equal to .650 for the 2017 first quarter and each quarter thereafter for the term of
the Credit Facility. The Leverage Ratio is calculated as the ratio of our consolidated total indebtedness to the sum of
consolidated total indebtedness and consolidated tangible net worth, all as defined under the Credit Facility.
Interest Coverage Ratio or Liquidity. We are required to maintain either (a) an Interest Coverage Ratio of greater than or
equal to 1.50 for the remaining term of the Credit Facility; or (b) a minimum level of liquidity, but not both. The Interest
Coverage Ratio is the ratio of our consolidated adjusted EBITDA to consolidated interest incurred, each as defined under
the Credit Facility, in each case for the previous 12 months. Our minimum liquidity level is required to be greater than or
equal to consolidated interest incurred, as defined under the Credit Facility, for the four most recently-ended fiscal quarters
in the aggregate.
In addition, under the Credit Facility, our investments in joint ventures and non-guarantor subsidiaries (which are shown,
respectively, in Note 9 – Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures and in Note 22 – Supplemental Guarantor Information in
the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report) cannot exceed the sum of (a) $117.4 million and (b) 20% of consolidated
tangible net worth; and our borrowing base indebtedness, which is the aggregate principal amount of our outstanding indebtedness
for borrowed money and non-collateralized financial letters of credit, cannot be greater than our borrowing base (a measure relating
to our inventory and unrestricted cash assets).
The covenants and other requirements under our Credit Facility represent the most restrictive provisions that we are subject
to with respect to our notes payable. The following table summarizes the financial covenants and other requirements under the
Credit Facility, and our actual levels or ratios (as applicable) with respect to those covenants and other requirements, in each case
as of November 30, 2016:
Financial Covenants and Other Requirements
Covenant Requirement
Actual
Consolidated tangible net worth
Leverage Ratio
Interest Coverage Ratio (a)
Minimum liquidity (a)
Investments in joint ventures and non-guarantor subsidiaries
Borrowing base in excess of borrowing base indebtedness (as defined)
> $
1.22 billion $
1.72 billion
<
>
> $
< $
.700
1.500
.605
2.071
181.9 million $
592.1 million
462.1 million $
100.0 million
n/a
$
513.6 million
(a) Under the terms of the Credit Facility, we are required to meet either the Interest Coverage Ratio or a minimum level of liquidity,
but not both. As of November 30, 2016, we met both the Interest Coverage Ratio and the minimum liquidity requirements.
34
The indenture governing the senior notes does not contain any financial covenants. Subject to specified exceptions, the indenture
contains certain restrictive covenants that, among other things, limit our ability to incur secured indebtedness, or engage in sale-
leaseback transactions involving property or assets above a certain specified value. In addition, the senior notes (with the exception
of the 7 1/4% senior notes due 2018 (“7 1/4% Senior Notes due 2018”)) contain certain limitations related to mergers, consolidations,
and sales of assets.
Our obligations to pay principal, premium, if any, and interest under our senior notes and borrowings, if any, under the Credit
Facility are guaranteed on a joint and several basis by certain of our subsidiaries (“Guarantor Subsidiaries”). The guarantees are
full and unconditional and the Guarantor Subsidiaries are 100% owned by us. We may also cause other subsidiaries of ours to
become Guarantor Subsidiaries if we believe it to be in our or the relevant subsidiary’s best interests. Condensed consolidating
financial information for our subsidiaries considered to be Guarantor Subsidiaries is provided in Note 22 – Supplemental Guarantor
Information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
As of November 30, 2016, we were in compliance with the applicable terms of all our covenants and other requirements under
the Credit Facility, the senior notes, the indenture, and the mortgages and land contracts due to land sellers and other loans. Our
ability to access the Credit Facility for cash borrowings and letters of credit and our ability to secure future debt financing depend,
in part, on our ability to remain in such compliance. There are no agreements that restrict our payment of dividends other than to
maintain compliance with the financial covenant requirements under the Credit Facility, which would restrict our payment of
dividends if a default under the Credit Facility exists at the time of any such payment, or if any such payment would result in such
a default.
Depending on available terms, we finance certain land acquisitions with purchase-money financing from land sellers or with
other forms of financing from third parties. At November 30, 2016, we had outstanding mortgages and land contracts due to land
sellers and other loans payable in connection with such financing of $66.9 million, secured primarily by the underlying property,
which had an aggregate carrying value of $181.8 million.
Consolidated Cash Flows. The following table presents a summary of net cash provided by (used in) our operating, investing
and financing activities (in thousands):
Net cash provided by (used in):
Operating activities
Investing activities
Financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Years Ended November 30,
2016
2015
2014
$
$
188,655
$
181,185
$
(630,691)
(6,079)
(149,917)
(11,303)
31,691
32,659
$
201,573
$
(44,782)
501,718
(173,755)
Operating Activities. Operating activities provided net cash of $188.7 million in 2016 and $181.2 million in 2015, and used
net cash of $630.7 million in 2014. Generally, our net operating cash flows fluctuate primarily based on changes in our inventories
and our profitability. The year-over-year change in net operating cash flows for 2016 primarily reflected an increase in net income,
partly offset by a net increase in inventories. Our net cash provided by operating activities in 2015 was mainly driven by net income
and a decrease in inventories. In 2014, the net cash used in operating activities was largely due to cash used for investments in land
and land development during that year in support of our strategic growth initiatives, partly offset by an increase in net income.
Our net cash provided by operating activities in 2016 largely reflected net income of $105.6 million, a net increase in accounts
payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities of $32.7 million and a net decrease in receivables of $19.0 million, partly offset by
net cash of $98.3 million used for investments in inventories. In 2015, our net cash provided by operating activities primarily
reflected net income of $84.6 million, a net decrease in inventories of $34.9 million, and a net decrease in receivables of $9.1
million. These sources of cash were partly offset by a net decrease in accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities of
$27.6 million. In 2014, our net cash used by operating activities primarily reflected net cash of $780.1 million used to increase our
inventories through investments in land and land development, partly offset by pretax income of $94.9 million.
Investing Activities. Investing activities used net cash of $6.1 million in 2016, $11.3 million in 2015 and $44.8 million in 2014.
Our uses of cash in 2016 included $5.6 million for contributions to unconsolidated joint ventures and $4.8 million for net purchases
of property and equipment. These uses of cash were largely offset by a $4.3 million return of investments in unconsolidated joint
ventures. In 2015, the net cash used in investing activities reflected $20.6 million of contributions to unconsolidated joint ventures
and $4.7 million of cash used for net purchases of property and equipment, which were partially offset by a return of investments
in unconsolidated joint ventures of $14.0 million. In 2014, the net cash used in investing activities was largely due to contributions
35
of $49.1 million to unconsolidated joint ventures, partly offset by proceeds of $10.1 million from the sale of our investment in an
unconsolidated joint venture in Maryland.
Financing Activities. Financing activities used net cash of $149.9 million in 2016 and provided net cash of $31.7 million in
2015 and $501.7 million in 2014. The year-over-year change in 2016 was primarily due to cash used to repurchase shares of our
common stock, compared to the net proceeds received from the underwritten public issuance of senior notes in 2015. In 2016, cash
was used for repurchases of shares of our common stock at a total cost of $88.4 million, payments on mortgages and land contracts
due to land sellers and other loans of $67.8 million and dividend payments on our common stock of $8.6 million. The cash used
was partly offset by a decrease of $9.3 million in our restricted cash balance and $5.3 million of issuances of common stock under
employee stock plans. In 2015, the year-over-year change in cash provided by financing activities was largely due to the issuance
of senior notes and common stock in 2014. In 2015, cash was mainly provided by proceeds of $250.0 million received from the
issuance of the 7.625% Senior Notes due 2023 and a decrease of $17.9 million in our restricted cash balance. The cash provided
was partly offset by cash used to retire $199.9 million in aggregate principal amount of certain senior notes at their maturity on
June 15, 2015, payments on mortgages and land contracts due to land sellers and other loans of $22.9 million, dividend payments
on our common stock of $9.2 million, and the payment of debt issuance costs of $4.6 million associated with the issuance of the
7.625% Senior Notes due 2023 and the Credit Facility. In 2014, the cash provided from financing activities primarily reflected
$400.0 million from the issuance of the 4.75% senior notes due 2019 (“4.75% Senior Notes due 2019”) and net proceeds of $137.0
million from the underwritten public issuance of 7,986,111 shares of our common stock.
Our board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends of $.0250 per share of common stock in 2016, 2015 and 2014.
Cash dividends declared and paid during each of the years ended November 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014 totaled $.10 per share of
common stock. The declaration and payment of future cash dividends on our common stock are at the discretion of our board of
directors, and depend upon, among other things, our expected future earnings, cash flows, capital requirements, debt structure and
any adjustments thereto, operational and financial investment strategy and general financial condition, as well as general business
conditions.
Shelf Registration Statement. We have an automatically effective universal shelf registration statement (“2014 Shelf
Registration”), which was filed on July 18, 2014, on file with the SEC. Issuances of debt and equity securities under our 2014
Shelf Registration require the filing of a prospectus supplement identifying the amount and terms of the securities to be issued. Our
ability to issue equity and/or debt is subject to market conditions and other factors impacting our borrowing capacity.
Share Repurchase Program. On January 12, 2016, our board of directors authorized us to repurchase a total of up to 10,000,000
shares of our outstanding common stock. This authorization reaffirmed and incorporated the then-current balance of 4,000,000
shares that remained under a prior board-approved share repurchase program. The amount and timing of shares purchased under
this 10,000,000 share repurchase program are subject to market and business conditions and other factors, and purchases may be
made from time to time and at any time through open market or privately negotiated transactions. This share repurchase authorization
will continue in effect until fully used or earlier terminated or suspended by the board of directors. As of November 30, 2016, we
had repurchased 8,373,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to this authorization, at a total cost of $85.9 million. All of these
share repurchases were made in the 2016 first quarter. We did not repurchase any of our common stock under this program in 2015
or 2014.
Unrelated to the common stock repurchase program, as further discussed in Note 17 – Stockholders’ Equity in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements in this report, our board of directors authorized in 2014 the repurchase of no more than 680,000
shares of our outstanding common stock solely as necessary for director compensation elections with respect to settling outstanding
stock appreciation rights awards (“Director Plan SARs”) granted under our Non-Employee Directors Compensation Plan (“Director
Plan”). As of November 30, 2016, no Director Plan SARs had been settled. We do not anticipate any additional repurchases of
our common stock pursuant to this board of directors authorization.
We believe we have adequate capital resources and sufficient access to the credit and capital markets and external financing
sources to satisfy our current and reasonably anticipated long-term requirements for funds to acquire assets and land, to use and/
or develop acquired assets and land, to construct homes, to finance our financial services operations and to meet other needs in the
ordinary course of our business. In addition to acquiring and/or developing land that meets our investment return standards, in
2017, we may use or redeploy our unrestricted cash resources or cash borrowings under the Credit Facility to support other business
purposes that are aligned with our primary strategic growth goals. We may also arrange or engage in capital markets, bank loan,
project debt or other financial transactions. These transactions may include repurchases from time to time of our outstanding
common stock. They may also include repurchases from time to time of our outstanding senior notes or other debt through
redemptions, tender offers, exchange offers, private exchanges, open market or private purchases or other means, as well as potential
new issuances of equity or senior or convertible senior notes or other debt through public offerings, private placements or other
arrangements to raise or access additional capital to support our current land and land development investment targets, to complete
strategic transactions and for other business purposes and/or to effect repurchases or redemptions of our outstanding senior notes
36
or other debt. The amounts involved in these transactions, if any, may be material. As necessary or desirable, we may adjust or
amend the terms of and/or expand the capacity of the Credit Facility or the LOC Facility, or enter into additional letter of credit
facilities, or other similar facility arrangements, in each case with the same or other financial institutions, or allow any such facilities
to mature or expire. Our ability to engage in such transactions, however, may be constrained by economic, capital, credit and/or
financial market conditions, investor interest and/or our current leverage ratios, and we can provide no assurance of the success or
costs of any such transactions.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures. As discussed in Note 9 – Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements in this report, we have investments in unconsolidated joint ventures in various markets where
our homebuilding operations are located. Our unconsolidated joint ventures had total combined assets of $198.8 million at
November 30, 2016 and $207.0 million at November 30, 2015. Our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures totaled $64.0
million at November 30, 2016 and $71.6 million at November 30, 2015. As of November 30, 2016 and 2015, one of our
unconsolidated joint ventures had outstanding secured debt of $44.4 million and $39.1 million, respectively, under a construction
loan agreement. The unconsolidated joint venture’s outstanding secured debt is non-recourse to us and is scheduled to mature in
August 2018. While we and our partner in the unconsolidated joint venture provided certain guarantees and indemnities to the
lender, we do not have a guaranty or any other obligation to repay or to support the value of the collateral underlying the
unconsolidated joint venture’s outstanding secured debt. We do not believe that our existing exposure under our guaranty and
indemnity obligations related to the unconsolidated joint venture’s outstanding secured debt is material to our consolidated financial
statements. None of our other unconsolidated joint ventures had outstanding debt at November 30, 2016 or 2015. As discussed
in Note 8 – Variable Interest Entities in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report, we determined that one of
our joint ventures at November 30, 2016 was a VIE, but we were not the primary beneficiary of this VIE. At November 30, 2015,
we determined that none of our joint ventures were VIEs. All of our joint ventures were unconsolidated and accounted for under
the equity method because we did not have a controlling financial interest.
Land Option Contracts and Other Similar Contracts. As discussed in Note 8 – Variable Interest Entities in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements in this report, in the ordinary course of our business, we enter into land option contracts and
other similar contracts with third parties and unconsolidated entities to acquire rights to land for the construction of homes. At
November 30, 2016, we had total cash deposits of $42.8 million to purchase land having an aggregate purchase price of $1.07
billion. At November 30, 2015, we had total cash deposits of $54.5 million to purchase land having an aggregate purchase price
of $1.19 billion. Our land option contracts and other similar contracts generally do not contain provisions requiring our specific
performance. Our decision to exercise a particular land option contract or other similar contract depends on the results of our due
diligence reviews and ongoing market and project feasibility analysis that we conduct after entering into such a contract. In some
cases, our decision to exercise a land option contract or other similar contract may be conditioned on the land seller obtaining
necessary entitlements, such as zoning rights and environmental and development approvals, and/or physically developing the
underlying land by a pre-determined date. We typically have the ability not to exercise our rights to the underlying land for any
reason and forfeit our deposits without further penalty or obligation to the sellers. If we were to acquire all of the land we controlled
under our land option contracts and other similar contracts at November 30, 2016, we estimate the remaining purchase price to
be paid would be as follows: 2017 – $681.1 million; 2018 – $116.5 million; 2019 – $85.9 million; 2020 – $37.2 million; 2021 –
$32.8 million; and thereafter – $77.3 million.
In addition to the cash deposits, our exposure to loss related to our land option contracts and other similar contracts consisted
of pre-acquisition costs of $56.0 million at November 30, 2016 and $65.6 million at November 30, 2015. These pre-acquisition
costs and cash deposits were included in inventories in our consolidated balance sheets.
We determined that as of November 30, 2016 and November 30, 2015 we were not the primary beneficiary of any VIEs from
which we have acquired rights to land under land option contracts and other similar contracts. We also evaluate our land option
contracts and other similar contracts for financing arrangements, and, as a result of our evaluations, increased inventories, with a
corresponding increase to accrued expenses and other liabilities, in our consolidated balance sheets by $50.5 million at
November 30, 2016 and $110.0 million at November 30, 2015, as further discussed in Note 8 – Variable Interest Entities in the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
37
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMERCIAL COMMITMENTS
The following table presents our future cash requirements under contractual obligations as of November 30, 2016 (in millions):
Total
2017
2018-2019
2020-2021
Thereafter
Payments due by Period
Contractual obligations:
Long-term debt
Interest
Inventory-related obligations (a)
Purchase obligation (b)
Operating lease obligations
$
2,661.9
$
331.9
$
930.0
$
350.0
$
1,050.0
668.9
82.7
53.0
36.2
174.1
48.0
17.8
7.7
256.6
7.0
32.8
13.9
167.6
3.2
2.4
7.0
70.6
24.5
—
7.6
Total (c)
$
3,502.7
$
579.5
$
1,240.3
$
530.2
$
1,152.7
(a) Represents liabilities for inventory not owned associated with financing arrangements as discussed in Note 8 – Variable Interest
Entities in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report, as well as liabilities for fixed or determinable amounts
associated with tax increment financing entity (“TIFE”) assessments. As homes are delivered, the obligation to pay the
remaining TIFE assessments associated with each underlying lot is transferred to the homebuyer. As such, these assessment
obligations will be paid by us only to the extent we do not deliver homes on applicable lots before the related TIFE obligations
mature.
(b) Represents our commitment to purchase lots from one of our unconsolidated joint ventures as discussed in Note 9 – Investments
in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report. Our land option contracts
and other similar contracts generally do not contain provisions requiring our specific performance.
(c) Total contractual obligations exclude our accrual for uncertain tax positions recorded for financial reporting purposes as of
November 30, 2016 because we are unable to make a reasonable estimate of cash settlements with the respective taxing
authorities for all periods presented. We anticipate these potential cash settlement requirements for 2017 to range from zero
to $.1 million.
As discussed in Note 15 – Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report,
we had $535.7 million of performance bonds and $31.0 million of letters of credit outstanding at November 30, 2016. At November
30, 2015, we had $565.4 million of performance bonds and $33.4 million of letters of credit outstanding.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
The accompanying consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with GAAP. The preparation of these
financial statements requires the use of estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented.
Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in
the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report for a discussion of our significant accounting policies. The following
are accounting policies that we believe are critical because of the significance of the activity to which they relate or because they
require the use of significant estimates, judgments and/or other assumptions in their application.
Homebuilding Revenue Recognition. Revenues from housing and other real estate sales are recognized when sales are closed
and title passes to the buyer. Sales are closed when all of the following conditions are met: a sale is consummated, a sufficient
down payment is received, the earnings process is complete and the collection of any remaining receivables is reasonably assured.
Concurrent with the recognition of revenues in our consolidated statements of operations, sales incentives in the form of price
concessions on the selling price of a home are recorded as a reduction of revenues, while the costs of sales incentives in the form
of free or discounted products or services to homebuyers, including option upgrades and closing cost allowances used to cover a
portion of the fees and costs charged to a homebuyer, are reflected as construction and land costs.
Inventories and Cost of Sales. Housing and land inventories are stated at cost, unless the carrying value is determined not to
be recoverable, in which case the affected inventories are written down to fair value or fair value less associated costs to sell. Fair
value is determined based on estimated future net cash flows discounted for inherent risks associated with the real estate assets,
or other valuation techniques. Due to uncertainties in the estimation process and other factors beyond our control, it is possible
38
that actual results could differ from those estimated. Our inventories typically do not consist of completed unsold homes. However,
cancellations or strategic considerations may result in our having unsold completed or partially completed homes in our inventory.
We rely on certain estimates to determine our construction and land costs and resulting housing gross profit margins associated
with revenues recognized. Construction and land costs are comprised of direct and allocated costs, including estimated future
costs for the limited warranty we provide on our homes and certain amenities within a community. Land acquisition, land
development and other common costs are generally allocated on a relative fair value basis to the homes or lots within the applicable
community or land parcel. Land acquisition and land development costs include related interest and real estate taxes.
In determining a portion of the construction and land costs recognized for each period, we rely on project budgets that are
based on a variety of assumptions, including future construction schedules and costs to be incurred. It is possible that actual results
could differ from budgeted amounts for various reasons, including construction delays, construction resource shortages, increases
in costs that have not yet been committed, changes in governmental requirements, unforeseen environmental hazards or other
unanticipated issues encountered during construction and other factors beyond our control. While the actual results for a particular
construction project are accurately reported over time, variances between the budgeted and actual costs of a project could result
in the understatement or overstatement of construction and land costs and homebuilding gross profits in a particular reporting
period. To reduce the potential for such distortion, we have set forth procedures that collectively comprise a critical accounting
policy. These procedures, which we have applied on a consistent basis, include assessing, updating and revising project budgets
on a monthly basis, obtaining commitments to the extent possible from independent subcontractors and vendors for future costs
to be incurred, reviewing the adequacy of warranty accruals and historical warranty claims experience, and utilizing the most
current information available to estimate construction and land costs to be charged to expense. Variances to the budgeted costs
after an estimate has been charged to expense that are related to project costs are generally allocated on a relative fair value basis
to the remaining homes to be delivered within the community or land parcel, while such variances related to direct construction
costs are generally expensed as incurred. The variances between budgeted and actual costs have historically not been material to
our consolidated financial statements. We believe that our policies provide for reasonably dependable estimates to be used in the
calculation and reporting of construction and land costs.
Inventory Impairments and Land Option Contract Abandonments. Each community or land parcel in our owned inventory
is assessed to determine if indicators of potential impairment exist. Impairment indicators are assessed separately for each
community or land parcel on a quarterly basis and include, but are not limited to, the following: significant decreases in net orders,
average selling prices, volume of homes delivered, gross profit margins on homes delivered or projected gross profit margins on
homes in backlog or future deliveries; significant increases in budgeted land development and home construction costs or
cancellation rates; or projected losses on expected future land sales. If indicators of potential impairment exist for a community
or land parcel, the identified asset is evaluated for recoverability.
The following table presents information regarding inventory impairment and land option contract abandonment charges
included in construction and land costs in our consolidated statements of operations (dollars in thousands):
Inventory impairments:
Number of communities or land parcels evaluated for recoverability (a)
Carrying value of communities or land parcels evaluated for
recoverability (a)
Number of communities or land parcels written down to fair value
Pre-impairment carrying value of communities or land parcels written
down to fair value
Inventory impairment charges
Post-impairment fair value
Land option contract abandonments:
Number of lots abandoned
Land option contract abandonment charges
Years Ended November 30,
2016
2015
2014
68
35
32
423,122
$
286,333
$
266,850
30
4
8
$
89,097
(49,580)
$
20,018
(8,030)
68,223
(37,628)
39,517
$
11,988
$
30,595
744
3,232
$
1,166
1,561
$
1,306
1,803
$
$
$
$
(a) As impairment indicators are assessed on a quarterly basis, some of the communities or land parcels evaluated during the
years ended November 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014 were evaluated in more than one quarterly period. Communities or land
39
parcels evaluated for recoverability in more than one quarterly period are counted only once for each applicable year. The
year-over-year increase in the number and carrying value of communities evaluated for impairment in 2016 reflected our
decisions to make changes in our operational strategies for specific communities or land parcels aimed at more quickly
monetizing our investment in those inventories, as discussed further in Note 7 – Inventory Impairments and Land Option
Contract Abandonments in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
When an indicator of potential impairment is identified for a community or land parcel, we test the asset for recoverability
by comparing the carrying value of the asset to the undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. The
undiscounted future net cash flows are impacted by then-current conditions and trends in the market in which the asset is located
as well as factors known to us at the time the cash flows are calculated. These factors may include recent trends in our orders,
backlog, cancellation rates and volume of homes delivered, as well as our expectations related to the following: product offerings;
market supply and demand, including estimated average selling prices and related price appreciation; and land development, home
construction and overhead costs to be incurred and related cost inflation.
As further described in Note 7 – Inventory Impairments and Land Option Contract Abandonments in the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements in this report, given the inherent challenges and uncertainties in forecasting future results, our inventory
assessments at the time they are made take into consideration whether a community or land parcel is active, meaning whether it
is open for sales and/or undergoing development, or whether it is being held for future development or held for sale.
We record an inventory impairment charge on a community or land parcel that is active or held for future development when
its carrying value is greater than the undiscounted future net cash flows the asset is expected to generate. These real estate assets
are written down to fair value, which is primarily determined based on the estimated future net cash flows discounted for inherent
risk associated with each such asset, or other valuation techniques. Inputs used in our calculation of estimated discounted future
net cash flows are specific to each affected real estate asset and are based on our expectations for each such asset as of the applicable
measurement date, including, among others, expectations related to average selling prices and volume of homes delivered. The
discount rates used in our estimated discounted cash flows ranged from 17% to 20% during both 2016 and 2015, and 17% to 19%
during 2014. The discount rates we used were impacted by one or more of the following at the time the calculation was made:
the risk-free rate of return; expected risk premium based on estimated land development, home construction and delivery timelines;
market risk from potential future price erosion; cost uncertainty due to land development or home construction cost increases; and
other risks specific to the asset or conditions in the market in which the asset is located.
We record an inventory impairment charge on land held for sale when the carrying value of the real estate asset is greater than
its fair value. These real estate assets are written down to fair value, less associated costs to sell. The fair value of such real estate
assets is generally based on bona fide letters of intent from outside parties, executed sales contracts, broker quotes or similar
information.
As of November 30, 2016, the aggregate carrying value of our inventory that had been impacted by inventory impairment
charges was $215.3 million, representing 28 communities and various other land parcels. As of November 30, 2015, the aggregate
carrying value of our inventory that had been impacted by inventory impairment charges was $254.2 million, representing 28
communities and various other land parcels.
Our inventory controlled under land option contracts and other similar contracts is assessed to determine whether it continues
to meet our investment return standards. Assessments are made separately for each optioned land parcel on a quarterly basis and
are affected by the following factors relative to the market in which the asset is located, among others: current and/or anticipated
net orders, average selling prices and volume of homes delivered; estimated land development and home construction costs; and
projected profitability on expected future housing or land sales. When a decision is made not to exercise certain land option
contracts and other similar contracts due to market conditions and/or changes in our marketing strategy, we write off the related
inventory costs, including non-refundable deposits and unrecoverable pre-acquisition costs.
The estimated remaining life of each community or land parcel in our inventory depends on various factors, such as the total
number of lots remaining; the expected timeline to acquire and entitle land and develop lots to build homes; the anticipated future
net order and cancellation rates; and the expected timeline to build and deliver homes sold. While it is difficult to determine a
precise timeframe for any particular inventory asset, based on current market conditions and expected delivery timelines, we
estimate our inventory assets’ remaining operating lives to range generally from one year to in excess of 10 years and expect to
realize, on an overall basis, the majority of our inventory balance as of November 30, 2016 within five years. The following table
presents our inventory balance as of November 30, 2016, based on our current estimated timeframe of delivery for the last home
within an applicable community or land parcel (in millions):
40
0-2 years
3-5 years
6-10 years
Greater than
10 years
Total
Inventories
$
1,919.8
$
1,171.0
$
229.0
$
83.4
$
3,403.2
The inventory balances in the 0-2 years and 3-5 years categories were located throughout all of our homebuilding reporting
segments, though mostly in our West Coast and Central homebuilding reporting segments. These categories collectively represented
91% of our total inventories as of November 30, 2016, compared to 85% as of November 30, 2015. The inventory balances in
the 6-10 years and greater than 10 years categories were primarily comprised of land held for future development, and together
totaled $312.4 million at November 30, 2016, compared to $489.2 million at November 30, 2015. The year-over-year decrease
was primarily related to our decisions to monetize certain non-strategic land parcels through land sales and to accelerate the overall
timing for selling, building and delivering homes through community reactivations.
Due to the judgment and assumptions applied in our inventory impairment and land option contract abandonment assessment
processes, and in our estimations of the remaining operating lives of our inventory assets and the realization of our inventory
balances, particularly as to land held for future development, it is possible that actual results could differ substantially from those
estimated.
Deterioration in the supply and demand factors in the overall housing market or in an individual market or submarket, or
changes to our operational or selling strategy at certain communities may lead to additional inventory impairment charges, future
charges associated with land sales or the abandonment of land option contracts or other similar contracts related to certain assets.
Due to the nature or location of the projects, land held for future development that we activate as part of our strategic growth
initiatives or to accelerate sales and/or our return on investment, or that we otherwise monetize to help improve our asset efficiency,
may have a somewhat greater likelihood of being impaired than other of our active inventory.
We believe that the carrying value of our inventory balance as of November 30, 2016 is recoverable. Our considerations in
making this determination include the factors and trends incorporated into our impairment analyses, and as applicable, the prevailing
regulatory environment, competition from other homebuilders, inventory levels and sales activity of resale homes, and the local
economic conditions where an asset is located. In addition, we consider the financial and operational status and expectations of
our inventories as well as unique attributes of each community or land parcel that could be viewed as indicators for potential future
impairments. However, if conditions in the overall housing market or in a specific market or submarket worsen in the future
beyond our current expectations, if future changes in our business strategy significantly affect any key assumptions used in our
projections of future cash flows, or if there are material changes in any of the other items we consider in assessing recoverability,
we may recognize charges in future periods for inventory impairments or land option contract abandonments, or both, related to
our current inventory assets. Any such charges could be material to our consolidated financial statements.
Warranty Costs. We provide a limited warranty on all of our homes. The specific terms and conditions of our limited warranty
program vary depending upon the markets in which we do business. We estimate the costs that may be incurred under each limited
warranty and record a liability in the amount of such costs at the time the revenue associated with the sale of each home is recognized.
In assessing our overall warranty liability at a reporting date, we evaluate the costs for warranty-related items on a combined basis
for all of our previously delivered homes that are under our limited warranty program.
Our primary assumption in estimating the amounts we accrue for warranty costs is that historical claims experience is a strong
indicator of future claims experience. Factors that affect our warranty liability include the number of homes delivered, historical
and anticipated rates of warranty claims, and cost per claim. We periodically assess the adequacy of our accrued warranty liability,
which is included in accrued expenses and other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets, and adjust the amount as necessary
based on our assessment. Our assessment includes the review of our actual warranty costs incurred to identify trends and changes
in our warranty claims experience, and considers our home construction quality and customer service initiatives and outside events.
While we believe the warranty liability currently reflected in our consolidated balance sheets to be adequate, unanticipated
changes or developments in the legal environment, local weather, land or environmental conditions, quality of materials or methods
used in the construction of homes or customer service practices and/or our warranty claims experience could have a significant
impact on our actual warranty costs in future periods and such amounts could differ significantly from our current estimates. A
10% change in the historical warranty rates used to estimate our warranty accrual would not result in a material change in our
accrual.
Self-Insurance. We maintain, and require the majority of our independent subcontractors to maintain, general liability insurance
(including construction defect and bodily injury coverage) and workers’ compensation insurance. These insurance policies protect
us against a portion of our risk of loss from claims related to our homebuilding activities, subject to certain self-insured retentions,
deductibles and other coverage limits. We self-insure a portion of our overall risk through the use of a captive insurance subsidiary.
We also maintain certain other insurance policies. In Arizona, California, Colorado and Nevada, our subcontractors’ general
41
liability insurance primarily takes the form of a wrap-up policy under a program where eligible independent subcontractors are
enrolled as insureds on each community. Enrolled subcontractors contribute toward the cost of the insurance and agree to pay a
contractual amount in the future if there is a claim related to their work.
We record liabilities based on the estimated costs required to cover reported claims, claims incurred but not yet reported, and
claim adjustment expenses. These estimated costs are based on an actuarial analysis of our historical claims and expense data, as
well as industry data. Our self-insurance liabilities are presented on a gross basis without consideration of insurance recoveries
and amounts we have paid on behalf of and expect to recover from other parties, if any.
The amount of our self-insurance liability is based on an analysis performed by a third-party actuary that uses our historical
claim and expense data, as well as industry data to estimate these overall costs. These estimates are subject to uncertainty due to
a variety of factors, the most significant being the long period of time between the delivery of a home to a homebuyer and when
a structural warranty or construction defect claim may be made, and the ultimate resolution of any such construction defect claim.
Though state regulations vary, construction defect claims are reported and resolved over a long period of time, which can extend
for 10 years or more. As a result, the majority of the estimated self-insurance liability based on the actuarial analysis relates to
claims incurred but not yet reported. Therefore, adjustments related to individual existing claims generally do not significantly
impact the overall estimated liability. Adjustments to our liabilities related to homes delivered in prior years are recorded in the
period in which a change in our estimate occurs.
The projection of losses related to these liabilities requires the use of actuarial assumptions. Key assumptions used in developing
these estimates include claim frequencies, severities and resolution patterns, which can occur over an extended period of time.
These estimates are subject to variability due to the length of time between the delivery of a home to a homebuyer and when a
construction defect claim is made, and the ultimate resolution of such claim; uncertainties regarding such claims relative to our
markets and the types of product we build; and legal or regulatory actions and/or interpretations, among other factors. Due to the
degree of judgment involved and the potential for variability in these underlying assumptions, our actual future costs could differ
from those estimated. In addition, changes in the frequency and severity of reported claims and the estimates to resolve claims
can impact the trends and assumptions used in the actuarial analysis, which could be material to our consolidated financial
statements. Based on the actuarial analysis performed, we believe it is reasonably possible that our losses related to construction
defect claims, prior to the consideration of insurance recoveries, as of November 30, 2016 could range from $145 million to $170
million; however, there can be no assurance that the actual costs will fall within this range and they could be higher.
Estimates of insurance recoveries and amounts we have paid on behalf of other parties, if any, are recorded as receivables
when such recoveries are considered probable. These estimated recoveries are principally based on actuarially determined amounts
and depend on various factors, including, among other things, the above-described claim cost estimates, our insurance policy
coverage limits for the applicable policy year(s), historical third party recovery rates, insurance industry practices, the regulatory
environment, and legal precedent, and are subject to a high degree of variability from year to year. Because of the inherent
uncertainty and variability in these assumptions, our actual insurance recoveries could differ significantly from amounts currently
estimated.
Stock-Based Compensation. We measure and recognize compensation expense associated with our grants of equity-based
awards at an amount equal to the fair value of such share-based payments over their applicable vesting period. We have provided
compensation benefits to certain of our employees in the form of stock options, restricted stock, performance-based restricted
stock units (each a “PSU”) and stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), and to our non-employee directors in the form of unrestricted
shares of common stock, deferred common stock awards and Director Plan SARs. Determining the fair value of share-based
awards requires judgment to identify the appropriate valuation model and develop the assumptions to be used in the calculation,
including the expected term of the stock options, SARs or Director Plan SARs, expected stock-price volatility and dividend yield.
We estimate the fair value of stock options, SARs and Director Plan SARs granted using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model
with assumptions based primarily on historical data. The expected volatility factor is based on a combination of the historical
volatility of our common stock and the implied volatility of publicly traded options on our common stock. Additionally, judgment
is required in estimating the percentage of share-based awards that are expected to vest, and in the case of PSUs, the level of
performance that will be achieved and the number of shares that will be earned. If actual results differ significantly from these
estimates, stock-based compensation expense could be higher and have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Income Taxes. As discussed in Note 12 – Income Taxes in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report,
we evaluate our deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if adjustments to our valuation allowance are required based on the
consideration of all available positive and negative evidence using a “more likely than not” standard with respect to whether
deferred tax assets will be realized. This evaluation considers, among other factors, our historical operating results, our expectation
of future profitability, the duration of the applicable statutory carryforward periods, and conditions in the housing market and the
broader economy. The ultimate realization of our deferred tax assets depends primarily on our ability to generate future taxable
income during the periods in which the related temporary differences in the financial basis and the tax basis of the assets become
42
deductible. The value of our deferred tax assets in our consolidated balance sheets depends on applicable income tax rates. We
base our estimate of deferred tax assets and liabilities on current tax laws and rates. In certain cases, we also base this estimate
on business plan forecasts and other expectations about future outcomes. Changes in positive and negative evidence, including
differences between our future operating results and estimates, could result in the establishment of an additional valuation allowance
against our deferred tax assets. Accounting for deferred taxes is based upon estimates of future results. Judgment is required in
determining the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our consolidated financial statements and/or tax
returns. Differences between the anticipated and actual outcomes of these future results could have a material impact on our
consolidated financial statements. Also, changes in existing federal and state tax laws and corporate income tax rates could affect
future tax results and the realization of deferred tax assets over time.
We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in our consolidated financial statements as
a component of the provision for or benefit from income taxes. Our liability for unrecognized tax benefits, combined with accrued
interest and penalties, is reflected as a component of accrued expenses and other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets.
Judgment is required in evaluating uncertain tax positions. We evaluate our uncertain tax positions quarterly based on various
factors, including changes in facts or circumstances, tax laws or the status of audits by tax authorities. Changes in the recognition
or measurement of uncertain tax positions could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements in the period in
which we make the change.
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
Recent accounting pronouncements are discussed in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements in this report.
OUTLOOK
In 2017, we intend to execute on our returns-focused growth plan, which is described in the “Business” section of this report.
We believe that doing so will enable us to generate higher cash flows that we can deploy in a targeted fashion to support the
balanced growth of our business and increase our return on invested capital, as well as reduce our debt, with the principal aim of
driving long-term stockholder value. Our present 2017 outlook is as follows:
• We expect our full-year housing revenues to be in the range of $3.8 billion to $4.2 billion, an increase from $3.6 billion
in 2016, and anticipate our average selling price to be in the range of $370,000 to $385,000, representing an increase in
the range of 2% to 6% as compared to 2016.
• We expect our full-year housing gross profit margin to range from 16.0% to 16.5%.
• We expect our full-year operating income margin to range from 5.7% to 6.3%.
• We expect our full-year selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of housing revenues to be in the
range of 10.0% to 10.5%.
• We expect our average community count to be approximately flat relative to 2016.
We believe we are well-positioned to achieve our top financial and operational targets for 2017 due to, among other things,
our backlog levels at November 30, 2016, our planned new home community openings, community reactivations and investments
in land and land development, as well as a recent increase in demand from first-time homebuyers and current positive economic
and demographic trends, to varying degrees, in many of our served markets.
Our future performance and the strategies we implement (and adjust or refine as necessary or appropriate) will depend
significantly on prevailing economic and capital, credit and financial market conditions and on a fairly stable and constructive
political and regulatory environment (particularly in regards to housing and mortgage loan financing policies), among other factors.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Investors are cautioned that certain statements contained in this report, as well as some statements by us in periodic press
releases and other public disclosures and some oral statements by us to securities analysts, stockholders and others during
presentations, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the
“Act”). Statements that are predictive in nature, that depend upon or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words
such as “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate,” “hope,” and similar expressions constitute forward-looking
statements. In addition, any statements that we may make or provide concerning future financial or operating performance
(including without limitation future revenues, community count, homes delivered, net orders, selling prices, sales pace per new
43
community, expenses, expense ratios, housing gross profits, housing gross profit margins, earnings or earnings per share, or growth
or growth rates), future market conditions, future interest rates, and other economic conditions, ongoing business strategies or
prospects, future dividends and changes in dividend levels, the value of our backlog (including amounts that we expect to realize
upon delivery of homes included in our backlog and the timing of those deliveries), the value of our net orders, potential future
asset acquisitions and the impact of completed acquisitions, future share issuances or repurchases, future debt issuances, repurchases
or redemptions and other possible future actions are also forward-looking statements as defined by the Act. Forward-looking
statements are based on our current expectations and projections about future events and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and
assumptions about our operations, economic and market factors, and the homebuilding industry, among other things. These
statements are not guarantees of future performance, and we have no specific policy or intention to update these statements. In
addition, forward-looking and other statements in this report and in other public or oral disclosures that express or contain opinions,
views or assumptions about market or economic conditions; the success, performance, effectiveness and/or relative positioning
of our strategies, initiatives or operational activities; and other matters, may be based in whole or in part on general observations
of our management, limited or anecdotal evidence and/or business or industry experience without in-depth or any particular
empirical investigation, inquiry or analysis.
Actual events and results may differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in forward-looking statements due to a
number of factors. The most important risk factors that could cause our actual performance and future events and actions to differ
materially from such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:
•
•
•
•
general economic, employment and business conditions;
population growth, household formations and demographic trends;
conditions in the capital, credit and financial markets;
our ability to access external financing sources and raise capital through the issuance of common stock, debt or other securities,
and/or project financing, on favorable terms;
• material and trade costs and availability;
•
•
•
•
changes in interest rates;
our debt level, including our ratio of debt to capital, and our ability to adjust our debt level and maturity schedule;
our compliance with the terms of the Credit Facility;
volatility in the market price of our common stock;
• weak or declining consumer confidence, either generally or specifically with respect to purchasing homes;
•
competition from other sellers of new and resale homes;
• weather events, significant natural disasters and other climate and environmental factors, including the severe prolonged
drought and related water-constrained conditions in the southwest United States and California;
•
•
•
•
•
government actions, policies, programs and regulations directed at or affecting the housing market (including the Dodd-Frank
Act, tax benefits associated with purchasing and owning a home, and the standards, fees and size limits applicable to the
purchase or insuring of mortgage loans by government-sponsored enterprises and government agencies), the homebuilding
industry, or construction activities;
changes in existing tax laws or enacted corporate income tax rates;
the availability and cost of land in desirable areas;
our warranty claims experience with respect to homes previously delivered and actual warranty costs incurred;
costs and/or charges arising from regulatory compliance requirements or from legal, arbitral or regulatory proceedings,
investigations, claims or settlements, including unfavorable outcomes in any such matters resulting in actual or potential
monetary damage awards, penalties, fines or other direct or indirect payments, or injunctions, consent decrees or other voluntary
or involuntary restrictions or adjustments to our business operations or practices that are beyond our current expectations and/
or accruals;
•
our ability to use/realize the net deferred tax assets we have generated;
44
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
our ability to successfully implement our current and planned strategies and initiatives related to our product, geographic and
market positioning (including our transition out of the Metro Washington, D.C. area), gaining share and scale in our served
markets;
our operational and investment concentration in markets in California;
consumer interest in our new home communities and products, particularly from first-time homebuyers and higher-income
consumers;
our ability to generate orders and convert our backlog of orders to home deliveries and revenues, particularly in key markets
in California;
our ability to successfully implement our returns-focused growth roadmap/strategy and achieve the associated revenue, margin,
profitability, cash flow, community reactivation, land sales, business growth, asset efficiency, return on invested capital, return
on equity, net debt-to-capital ratio and other financial and operational targets and objectives;
the ability of our homebuyers to obtain residential mortgage loans and mortgage banking services;
the performance of mortgage lenders to our homebuyers;
completing the wind down of HCM as planned;
Stearns Lending’s management of HCM’s assets and operations;
• whether we can operate a joint venture with Stearns Lending or any other mortgage banking services provider, and the
performance of any such mortgage banking joint venture once operational;
•
•
information technology failures and data security breaches; and
other events outside of our control.
Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We enter into debt obligations primarily to support general corporate purposes, including the operations of our subsidiaries.
We are subject to interest rate risk on our senior notes. For fixed rate debt, changes in interest rates generally affect the fair value
of the debt instrument, but not our earnings or cash flows. Under our current policies, we do not use interest rate derivative
instruments to manage our exposure to changes in interest rates.
The following tables present principal cash flows by scheduled maturity, weighted average effective interest rates and the
estimated fair value of our long-term fixed rate debt obligations as of November 30, 2016 and 2015 (dollars in thousands):
As of November 30, 2016 for the Years Ended November 30,
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Thereafter
Total
Fair Value at
November 30,
2016
Long-term debt
Fixed Rate
$
265,000
$
300,000
$
630,000
$
350,000
$
— $ 1,050,000
$ 2,595,000
$
2,718,519
Weighted Average
Effective Interest
Rate
Long-term debt
9.6%
7.3%
3.9%
8.5%
—%
7.5%
7.0%
As of November 30, 2015 for the Years Ended November 30,
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Thereafter
Total
Fair Value at
November 30,
2015
Fixed Rate
$
— $
265,000
$
300,000
$
630,000
$
350,000
$ 1,050,000
$ 2,595,000
$
2,641,163
Weighted Average
Effective Interest
Rate
—%
9.6%
7.3%
3.9%
8.5%
7.5%
7.0%
45
Item 8.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
KB HOME
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended November 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended November 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of November 30, 2016 and 2015
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended November 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended November 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Page
Number
47
48
49
50
51
52
95
Separate combined financial statements of our unconsolidated joint venture activities have been omitted because, if considered
in the aggregate, they would not constitute a significant subsidiary as defined by Rule 3-09 of Regulation S-X.
46
KB HOME
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
Total revenues
Homebuilding:
Revenues
Construction and land costs
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Operating income
Interest income
Interest expense
Equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures
Homebuilding pretax income
Financial services:
Revenues
Expenses
Equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures
Financial services pretax income
Total pretax income
Income tax benefit (expense)
Net income
Earnings per share:
Basic
Diluted
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic
Diluted
See accompanying notes.
$
$
$
$
$
Years Ended November 30,
2016
2015
2014
3,594,646
$
3,032,030
$
2,400,949
$
3,582,943
(3,041,101)
(389,441)
$
3,020,987
(2,539,368)
(342,998)
2,389,643
(1,985,651)
(288,023)
152,401
529
(5,900)
(2,181)
138,621
458
(21,856)
(1,804)
115,969
443
(30,750)
741
144,849
115,419
86,403
11,703
(3,817)
(3,420)
4,466
149,315
(43,700)
11,043
(3,711)
4,292
11,624
127,043
(42,400)
11,306
(3,446)
686
8,546
94,949
823,400
105,615
$
84,643
$
918,349
1.23
1.12
$
$
.92
.85
$
$
85,706
96,278
92,054
102,857
10.26
9.25
89,265
99,314
47
KB HOME
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In Thousands)
Net income
$
105,615
$
84,643
$
918,349
Years Ended November 30,
2016
2015
2014
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Postretirement benefit plan adjustments:
Net actuarial gain (loss) arising during the period
Amortization of net actuarial loss
Amortization of prior service cost
Other comprehensive income (loss) before tax
Income tax expense related to items of other comprehensive income
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Comprehensive income
See accompanying notes.
468
79
1,556
2,103
(841)
1,262
3,745
848
1,556
6,149
(2,460)
3,689
(3,801)
357
1,556
(1,888)
(1,604)
(3,492)
$
106,877
$
88,332
$
914,857
48
KB HOME
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands, Except Shares)
Assets
Homebuilding:
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash
Receivables
Inventories
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures
Deferred tax assets, net
Other assets
Financial services
Total assets
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Homebuilding:
Accounts payable
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
Notes payable
Financial services
Stockholders’ equity:
November 30,
2016
2015
$
592,086
$
559,042
—
231,665
3,403,228
64,016
738,985
91,145
9,344
247,998
3,313,747
71,558
782,196
88,992
5,121,125
5,072,877
10,499
14,028
$
5,131,624
$
5,086,905
$
215,331
$
550,996
2,640,149
183,770
608,730
2,601,754
3,406,476
3,394,254
2,003
1,817
Preferred stock — $1.00 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued
—
—
Common stock — $1.00 par value; 290,000,000 shares authorized at November 30, 2016
and 2015; 116,224,208 and 115,547,682 shares issued at November 30, 2016 and 2015,
respectively
Paid-in capital
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Grantor stock ownership trust, at cost: 9,431,756 and 10,135,461 shares at November 30,
2016 and 2015, respectively
Treasury stock, at cost: 21,719,757 and 13,136,563 shares at November 30, 2016 and
2015, respectively
Total stockholders’ equity
116,224
696,938
1,563,742
(16,057)
115,548
682,871
1,466,713
(17,319)
(102,300)
(109,936)
(535,402)
(447,043)
1,723,145
1,690,834
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
5,131,624
$
5,086,905
See accompanying notes.
49
KB HOME
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In Thousands)
Years Ended November 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014
Number of Shares
Grantor
Stock
Ownership
Trust
Common
Stock
Treasury
Stock
Common
Stock
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
Grantor
Stock
Ownership
Trust
Treasury
Stock
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
Balance at November 30, 2013
115,296
(10,502)
(21,050)
$ 115,296
$788,893
$ 481,889
$
(17,516)
$ (113,911)
$(718,565)
$
Net income
Other comprehensive income,
net of tax
Dividends on common stock
Employee stock options/other
Conversion of liability awards
to equity awards
Stock awards
Stock-based compensation
Issuance of common stock
Stock repurchases
—
—
—
37
—
54
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
166
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
37
—
54
—
—
—
—
1,859
6,455
(1,859)
9,099
7,986
(33)
— (135,590)
—
—
918,349
—
(8,982)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(3,492)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1,805
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
272,635
(546)
536,086
918,349
(3,492)
(8,982)
1,896
6,455
—
9,099
137,045
(546)
Balance at November 30, 2014
115,387
(10,336)
(13,097)
115,387
668,857
1,391,256
(21,008)
(112,106)
(446,476)
1,595,910
Net income
Other comprehensive loss, net
of tax
Dividends on common stock
Employee stock options/other
Stock awards
Stock-based compensation
Stock repurchases
—
—
—
76
85
—
—
—
—
—
—
200
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(40)
—
—
—
76
85
—
—
—
—
—
(874)
(2,255)
17,143
—
84,643
—
(9,186)
—
—
—
—
—
3,689
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2,170
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(567)
84,643
3,689
(9,186)
(798)
—
17,143
(567)
Balance at November 30, 2015
115,548
(10,136)
(13,137)
115,548
682,871
1,466,713
(17,319)
(109,936)
(447,043)
1,690,834
Net income
Other comprehensive income,
net of tax
Dividends on common stock
Employee stock options/other
Stock awards
Stock-based compensation
Stock repurchases
—
—
—
552
124
—
—
—
—
—
—
704
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(8,583)
—
—
—
552
124
—
—
—
—
—
4,977
(7,760)
16,850
—
105,615
—
(8,586)
—
—
—
—
—
1,262
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
7,636
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(88,359)
105,615
1,262
(8,586)
5,529
—
16,850
(88,359)
Balance at November 30, 2016
116,224
(9,432)
(21,720)
$ 116,224
$696,938
$1,563,742
$
(16,057)
$ (102,300)
$(535,402)
$
1,723,145
See accompanying notes.
50
KB HOME
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In Thousands)
Years Ended November 30,
2016
2015
2014
$
105,615
$
84,643
$
918,349
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
Equity in (income) loss of unconsolidated joint ventures
Distributions of earnings from unconsolidated joint ventures
Amortization of discounts and issuance costs
Depreciation and amortization
Deferred income taxes
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
Stock-based compensation
Inventory impairments and land option contract abandonments
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Receivables
Inventories
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities
Other, net
5,601
—
7,576
3,637
43,211
(186)
16,850
52,812
18,965
(98,321)
32,723
172
(2,488)
—
7,738
3,411
43,036
(157)
17,143
9,591
9,143
34,852
(27,615)
1,888
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
188,655
181,185
Cash flows from investing activities:
Contributions to unconsolidated joint ventures
Return of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures
Proceeds from sale of investment in unconsolidated joint venture
Purchases of property and equipment, net
Net cash used in investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities:
Change in restricted cash
Proceeds from issuance of debt
Payment of debt issuance costs
Repayment of senior notes
Payments on mortgages and land contracts due to land sellers and
other loans
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net
Issuance of common stock under employee stock plans
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation
Payments of cash dividends
Stock repurchases
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
(5,602)
4,307
—
(4,784)
(6,079)
9,344
—
—
—
(67,845)
—
5,343
186
(8,586)
(88,359)
(149,917)
32,659
560,341
(20,626)
14,000
—
(4,677)
(11,303)
17,891
250,000
(4,561)
(199,906)
(22,877)
—
740
157
(9,186)
(567)
31,691
201,573
358,768
(1,427)
364
7,124
2,420
(825,232)
—
9,099
39,431
(4,998)
(780,131)
9,219
(4,909)
(630,691)
(49,097)
—
10,110
(5,795)
(44,782)
14,671
400,000
(5,448)
—
(36,918)
137,045
1,896
—
(8,982)
(546)
501,718
(173,755)
532,523
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
$
593,000
$
560,341
$
358,768
See accompanying notes.
51
KB HOME
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Operations. KB Home is a builder of attached and detached single-family residential homes, townhomes and condominiums.
As of November 30, 2016, we conducted ongoing operations in Arizona, California, Colorado, Florida, Nevada, North Carolina
and Texas. We also offer property and casualty insurance and, in certain instances, earthquake, flood and personal property
insurance to our homebuyers in the same markets where we build homes, and provide title services in the majority of our markets
located within our Central and Southeast homebuilding reporting segments. Until October 2016, we provided mortgage banking
services, including mortgage loan originations, to our homebuyers indirectly through HCM, a joint venture of a subsidiary of ours
and a subsidiary of Nationstar. HCM is accounted for as an unconsolidated joint venture within our financial services reporting
segment.
Basis of Presentation. Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and include our
accounts and those of the consolidated subsidiaries in which we have a controlling financial interest. All intercompany balances
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures in which we have less than
a controlling financial interest are accounted for using the equity method.
Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates
and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results
could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash. We consider all highly liquid short-term investments purchased with an
original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Our cash equivalents totaled $396.1 million at November 30,
2016 and $342.3 million at November 30, 2015. At November 30, 2016, the majority of our cash and cash equivalents was invested
in interest-bearing bank deposit accounts. At November 30, 2015, the majority of our cash and cash equivalents was invested in
money market funds and interest-bearing bank deposit accounts.
Restricted cash at November 30, 2015 consisted of cash deposited with various financial institutions as required collateral for
our LOC Facility.
Receivables. Receivables are evaluated for collectibility at least quarterly, and allowances for potential losses are established
or maintained on applicable receivables when collection is considered doubtful, taking into account historical experience, prevailing
economic conditions and other relevant information.
Property and Equipment and Depreciation. Property and equipment are recorded at cost and are depreciated over their
estimated useful lives, which generally range from two to 10 years, using the straight-line method. Repair and maintenance costs
are expensed as incurred. Property and equipment totaled $14.2 million, net of accumulated depreciation of $18.2 million, at
November 30, 2016, and $13.1 million, net of accumulated depreciation of $15.3 million, at November 30, 2015. Depreciation
expense totaled $3.6 million in 2016, $3.4 million in 2015 and $2.4 million in 2014.
Homebuilding Operations. Revenues from housing and other real estate sales are recognized when sales are closed and title
passes to the buyer. Sales are closed when all of the following conditions are met: a sale is consummated, a sufficient down
payment is received, the earnings process is complete and the collection of any remaining receivables is reasonably assured.
Concurrent with the recognition of revenues in our consolidated statements of operations, sales incentives in the form of price
concessions on the selling price of a home are recorded as a reduction of revenues, while the costs of sales incentives in the form
of free or discounted products or services to homebuyers, including option upgrades and closing cost allowances used to cover a
portion of the fees and costs charged to a homebuyer, are reflected as construction and land costs.
Construction and land costs are comprised of direct and allocated costs, including estimated future costs for the limited warranty
we provide on our homes and certain amenities within a community. Land acquisition, land development and other common costs
are generally allocated on a relative fair value basis to the homes or lots within the applicable community or land parcel. Land
acquisition and land development costs include related interest and real estate taxes.
Housing and land inventories are stated at cost, unless the carrying value is determined not to be recoverable, in which case
the affected inventories are written down to fair value or fair value less associated costs to sell. Real estate assets, such as our
housing and land inventories, are tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying
value may not be recoverable. Recoverability is measured by comparing the carrying value of an asset to the undiscounted future
net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. These impairment evaluations are significantly impacted by estimates for
the amounts and timing of future revenues, costs and expenses, and other factors. If the carrying value of a real estate asset is
52
determined not to be recoverable, the impairment charge to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying value
of the affected asset exceeds its estimated fair value. For land held for sale, if the fair value less associated costs to sell exceeds
the asset’s carrying value, no impairment charge is recognized.
Capitalized Interest. Interest is capitalized to inventories while the related communities or land are being actively developed
and until homes are completed or the land is available for immediate sale. Capitalized interest is amortized to construction and
land costs as the related inventories are delivered to homebuyers or land buyers (as applicable). For land held for future development
or sale, applicable interest is expensed as incurred.
Fair Value Measurements. Fair value measurements are used for inventories on a nonrecurring basis when events and
circumstances indicate that their carrying value is not recoverable. For these real estate assets, fair value is determined based on
the estimated future net cash flows discounted for inherent risk associated with each such asset, or other valuation techniques.
Our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, senior notes, convertible senior notes, and
mortgages and land contracts due to land sellers and other loans. Fair value measurements of financial instruments are determined
by various market data and other valuation techniques as appropriate. When available, we use quoted market prices in active
markets to determine fair value.
Financial Services Operations. Our financial services reporting segment generates revenues primarily from insurance
commissions and title services. These operations also earned marketing services fees, pursuant to a marketing services agreement
with a preferred lender, until July 2014. Marketing services fees were recognized when earned. Insurance commissions are
recognized when policies are issued. Title services revenues are recorded when closing services are rendered and title insurance
policies are issued, both of which generally occur at the time each applicable home is closed.
Warranty Costs. We provide a limited warranty on all of our homes. We estimate the costs that may be incurred under each
limited warranty and record a liability in the amount of such costs at the time the revenue associated with the sale of each home
is recognized. Our primary assumption in estimating the amounts we accrue for warranty costs is that historical claims experience
is a strong indicator of future claims experience. Factors that affect our warranty liability include the number of homes delivered,
historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims, and cost per claim. We periodically assess the adequacy of our accrued warranty
liability and adjust the amount as necessary based on our assessment.
Self-Insurance. We self-insure a portion of our overall risk through the use of a captive insurance subsidiary. We also maintain
certain other insurance policies. We record liabilities based on the estimated costs required to cover reported claims, claims incurred
but not yet reported, and claim adjustment expenses. These estimated costs are based on an actuarial analysis of our historical
claims and expense data, as well as industry data. Our self-insurance liabilities are presented on a gross basis without consideration
of insurance recoveries and amounts we have paid on behalf of and expect to recover from other parties, if any. Estimates of
insurance recoveries and amounts we have paid on behalf of other parties, if any, are recorded as receivables when such recoveries
are considered probable.
Advertising Costs. We expense advertising costs as incurred. We incurred advertising costs of $32.7 million in 2016, $33.4
million in 2015 and $30.2 million in 2014.
Legal Fees. Legal fees associated with litigation and similar proceedings that are not expected to provide a benefit in future
periods are generally expensed as incurred. Legal fees associated with land acquisition and development and other activities that
are expected to provide a benefit in future periods are capitalized to inventories in our consolidated balance sheets as incurred.
We expensed legal fees of $13.6 million in 2016, $11.7 million in 2015 and $10.9 million in 2014.
Stock-Based Compensation. We measure and recognize compensation expense associated with our grant of equity-based
awards at an amount equal to the fair value of share-based payments granted under compensation arrangements over the vesting
period. We estimate the fair value of stock options, SARs and Director Plan SARs granted using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model with assumptions based primarily on historical data. We report the tax benefit resulting from tax deductions in excess of
the compensation expense recognized for stock options and SARs in our consolidated statements of cash flows as an operating
cash outflow and a financing cash inflow.
Income Taxes. The provision for, or benefit from, income taxes is calculated using the asset and liability method, under which
deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and
liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are
evaluated on a quarterly basis to determine if adjustments to the valuation allowance are required. This evaluation is based on the
consideration of all available positive and negative evidence using a “more likely than not” standard with respect to whether
deferred tax assets will be realized. The ultimate realization of our deferred tax assets depends primarily on our ability to generate
future taxable income during the periods in which the related temporary differences in the financial basis and the tax basis of the
53
assets become deductible. The value of our deferred tax assets in our consolidated balance sheets depends on applicable income
tax rates.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss. The accumulated balances of other comprehensive loss in the consolidated balance
sheets as of November 30, 2016 and 2015 were comprised solely of adjustments recorded directly to accumulated other
comprehensive loss related to our benefit plan obligations. Such adjustments are made annually as of November 30, when our
benefit plan obligations are remeasured.
Earnings Per Share. We compute earnings per share using the two-class method, which is an allocation of earnings between
the holders of common stock and a company’s participating security holders. Our outstanding nonvested shares of restricted stock
contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends and, therefore, are considered participating securities for purposes of computing earnings
per share pursuant to the two-class method. We had no other participating securities at November 30, 2016, 2015 or 2014.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted. In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”). The
core principle of ASU 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to
customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or
services. In August 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date,” which delayed the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year. In 2016, the FASB
issued accounting standards updates that amended several aspects of ASU 2014-09. ASU 2014-09, as amended, is effective for
us beginning December 1, 2018 (with early adoption permitted beginning in our 2018 fiscal year) and allows for full retrospective
or modified retrospective methods of adoption. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting this guidance on our
consolidated financial statements, as well as the method we will use to adopt the new guidance, and have been involved in industry-
specific discussions with the FASB on the treatment of certain items. We do not believe the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will have
a material impact on the amount or timing of our homebuilding revenues.
In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)” (“ASU 2016-02”). ASU
2016-02 will require lessees to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by
those leases. Under ASU 2016-02, a lessee will be required to recognize assets and liabilities for leases with terms of more than
12 months. Lessor accounting remains substantially similar to current GAAP. In addition, disclosures of leasing activities are to
be expanded to include qualitative along with specific quantitative information. ASU 2016-02 will be effective for us beginning
December 1, 2019 (with early adoption permitted). ASU 2016-02 mandates a modified retrospective transition method. We are
currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting this guidance on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-09, “Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic
718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting” (“ASU 2016-09”). ASU 2016-09 simplifies several aspects
of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either
equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 will be effective for us beginning December
1, 2017 (with early adoption permitted). We are currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting this guidance on our
consolidated financial statements.
In August 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230):
Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments” (“ASU 2016-15”). ASU 2016-15 provides guidance on how certain
cash receipts and cash payments are to be presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-15 will be effective
for us beginning December 1, 2018 (with early adoption permitted). We are currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting
this guidance on our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230):
Restricted Cash” (“ASU 2016-18”). ASU 2016-18 requires that a statement of cash flows explain the change during the period
in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore,
amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents
when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-18
will be effective for us beginning December 1, 2018 (with early adoption permitted) and will be applied using a retrospective
transition method to each period presented. We are currently evaluating the potential impact of adopting this guidance on our
consolidated financial statements.
Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncement. In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-03,
“Interest — Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs” (“ASU 2015-03”).
ASU 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct
deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. ASU 2015-03 is to be applied on a
retrospective basis and represents a change in accounting principle. In August 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
54
No. 2015-15, “Interest — Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance
Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements — Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcement at June
18, 2015 EITF Meeting” (“ASU 2015-15”), which clarifies the treatment of debt issuance costs from line-of-credit arrangements
after the adoption of ASU 2015-03. In particular, ASU 2015-15 clarifies that the SEC staff would not object to an entity deferring
and presenting debt issuance costs related to a line-of-credit arrangement as an asset and subsequently amortizing the deferred
debt issuance costs ratably over the term of such arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the
line-of-credit arrangement. We elected to early adopt ASU 2015-03 effective November 30, 2016. The adoption of ASU 2015-03
resulted in the reclassification of unamortized debt issuance costs related to senior notes from other assets to notes payable in our
consolidated balance sheets in the amount of $18.3 million at November 30, 2016 and $23.8 million at November 30, 2015. As
permitted by ASU 2015-15, we elected not to reclassify unamortized debt issuance costs associated with our Credit Facility and
continue to present such capitalized costs in other assets.
Reclassifications. Certain amounts in our consolidated financial statements of prior years have been reclassified to conform
to the current period presentation.
Note 2.
Segment Information
We have identified five operating reporting segments, comprised of four homebuilding reporting segments and one financial
services reporting segment. As of November 30, 2016, our homebuilding reporting segments conducted ongoing operations in
the following states:
West Coast: California
Southwest: Arizona and Nevada
Central: Colorado and Texas
Southeast: Florida and North Carolina
Our homebuilding reporting segments are engaged in the acquisition and development of land primarily for residential purposes
and offer a wide variety of homes that are designed to appeal to first-time, move-up and active adult homebuyers. Our homebuilding
operations generate most of their revenues from the delivery of completed homes to homebuyers. They also earn revenues from
the sale of land.
Our homebuilding reporting segments were identified based primarily on similarities in economic and geographic
characteristics, product types, regulatory environments, methods used to sell and construct homes and land acquisition
characteristics. Management evaluates segment performance primarily based on segment pretax results.
In the 2016 second quarter, we announced that we had begun a transition out of the Metro Washington, D.C. market that is
expected to be completed in 2017. Our operations in the Metro Washington, D.C. market consisted of communities in Maryland
and Virginia, which are included in our Southeast homebuilding reporting segment, and represented 2% of our consolidated
homebuilding revenues for the year ended November 30, 2016. We are constructing and delivering homes in our remaining
communities in this market. We also have other land interests in this market that we intend to build out or sell. As described in
Note 7 – Inventory Impairments and Land Option Contract Abandonments, we recorded inventory impairment and land option
contract abandonment charges related to this transition during the year ended November 30, 2016.
Our financial services reporting segment offers property and casualty insurance and, in certain instances, earthquake, flood
and personal property insurance to our homebuyers in the same markets as our homebuilding reporting segments, and provides
title services in the majority of our markets located within our Central and Southeast homebuilding reporting segments. This
segment earns revenues primarily from insurance commissions and the provision of title services. Prior to July 2014, this segment
also earned revenues pursuant to the terms of a marketing services agreement with Nationstar, under which Nationstar was our
preferred mortgage lender and offered mortgage banking services, including mortgage loan originations, to our homebuyers who
elected to use the lender. From July 2014 until October 2016, we provided mortgage banking services, including mortgage loan
originations, to our homebuyers indirectly through HCM, a joint venture of a subsidiary of ours and a subsidiary of Nationstar.
Through these respective subsidiaries, we have a 49.9% ownership interest and Nationstar has a 50.1% ownership interest in HCM,
with Nationstar providing management oversight of HCM’s operations. In the 2016 fourth quarter, we and Nationstar began the
process to wind down HCM and transfer HCM’s operations and certain assets to Stearns Lending. Our homebuyers may select
any lender of their choice to obtain mortgage financing for the purchase of their home.
In the 2016 fourth quarter, a subsidiary of ours and a subsidiary of Stearns Lending entered into an agreement to form a
mortgage banking joint venture in which we each have a 50.0% ownership interest. The unconsolidated joint venture, which had
no impact on our consolidated statement of operations for the year ended November 30, 2016, is expected to begin offering services,
including mortgage loan originations, to our homebuyers in most of our served markets by the end of our 2017 second quarter,
55
subject to obtaining all requisite regulatory approvals and clearances. Our financial services reporting segment is separately
reported in our consolidated financial statements.
Corporate and other is a non-operating segment that develops and oversees the implementation of company-wide strategic
initiatives and provides support to our reporting segments by centralizing certain administrative functions. Corporate management
is responsible for, among other things, evaluating and selecting the geographic markets in which we operate, consistent with our
overall business strategy; allocating capital resources to markets for land acquisition and development activities; making major
personnel decisions related to employee compensation and benefits; and monitoring the financial and operational performance of
our divisions. Corporate and other includes general and administrative expenses related to operating our corporate headquarters.
A portion of the expenses incurred by Corporate and other is allocated to our homebuilding reporting segments.
Our segments follow the same accounting policies used for our consolidated financial statements as described in Note 1 –
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. The results of each segment are not necessarily indicative of the results that would
have occurred had the segment been an independent, stand-alone entity during the periods presented, nor are they indicative of
the results to be expected in future periods.
The following tables present financial information relating to our homebuilding reporting segments (in thousands):
Revenues:
West Coast
Southwest
Central
Southeast
Total
Pretax income (loss):
West Coast
Southwest
Central
Southeast
Corporate and other
Total
Equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures:
West Coast
Southwest
Central
Southeast
Total
Inventory impairment charges:
West Coast
Southwest
Central
Southeast
Total
56
Years Ended November 30,
2016
2015
2014
$
1,638,078
$
1,402,264
$
1,089,857
447,473
1,018,535
478,857
398,242
809,738
410,743
199,504
698,429
401,853
$
3,582,943
$
3,020,987
$
2,389,643
$
148,014
$
127,946
$
116,325
38,807
85,924
(29,385)
(98,511)
31,718
70,959
(22,758)
(92,446)
6,015
47,214
(11,158)
(71,993)
144,849
$
115,419
$
86,403
(1,561) $
(618)
—
(2)
(1,106) $
(696)
—
(2)
(374)
(2,176)
—
3,291
(2,181) $
(1,804) $
741
8,209
$
645
$
3,191
10,633
27,547
3,253
—
4,132
49,580
$
8,030
$
27,285
6,392
—
3,951
37,628
$
$
$
$
$
Land option contract abandonments:
West Coast
Southwest
Central
Southeast
Total
Inventories:
Homes under construction
West Coast
Southwest
Central
Southeast
Subtotal
Land under development
West Coast
Southwest
Central
Southeast
Subtotal
Land held for future development or sale
West Coast
Southwest
Central
Southeast
Subtotal
Total
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures:
West Coast
Southwest
Central
Southeast
Total
Assets:
West Coast
Southwest
Central
Southeast
Corporate and other
Total
Years Ended November 30,
2016
2015
2014
$
$
769
253
460
1,750
$
352
$
—
225
984
554
—
995
254
3,232
$
1,561
$
1,803
November 30,
2016
2015
$
695,742
$
130,886
297,290
122,020
535,795
112,032
263,345
120,184
1,245,938
1,031,356
820,088
268,507
456,508
182,554
788,607
317,331
421,783
238,324
1,727,657
1,766,045
210,910
122,927
15,439
80,357
429,633
277,954
104,677
22,082
111,633
516,346
3,403,228
$
3,313,747
51,612
$
9,905
—
2,499
64,016
$
54,360
14,697
—
2,501
71,558
1,847,279
564,636
$
909,497
414,730
1,740,299
582,030
829,811
507,844
1,384,983
1,412,893
$
$
$
$
57
$
5,121,125
$
5,072,877
Note 3.
Financial Services
The following tables present financial information relating to our financial services reporting segment (in thousands):
Revenues
Insurance commissions
Title services
Marketing services fees
Interest income
Total
Expenses
General and administrative
Operating income
Equity in income (loss) of unconsolidated joint ventures
Years Ended November 30,
2016
2015
2014
$
6,728
$
7,137
$
4,975
—
—
11,703
(3,817)
7,886
(3,420)
3,905
—
1
11,043
(3,711)
7,332
4,292
6,566
3,593
1,147
—
11,306
(3,446)
7,860
686
Pretax income
$
4,466
$
11,624
$
8,546
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Receivables
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Total liabilities
November 30,
2016
2015
$
$
$
$
914
$
1,764
7,771
50
1,299
2,245
10,440
44
10,499
$
14,028
2,003
2,003
$
$
1,817
1,817
The equity in loss of unconsolidated joint ventures in 2016 reflected fewer loan originations and higher overhead costs as
well as the wind down of HCM, and included an increase in HCM’s reserves for potential future losses on certain loans it originated.
While we believe we will not need to record any additional charges, it is reasonably possible that we may incur further losses with
respect to our equity interest in future periods as the wind down of HCM is completed. Although we are currently unable to
estimate the amount or range of such losses, if any, we believe they would not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
Although KB HOME Mortgage Company, which is 100% owned by us, ceased originating and selling mortgage loans in
September 2005, it may be required to repurchase, or provide indemnification with respect to, an individual loan that it funded
on or before August 31, 2005 and sold to an investor if the representations or warranties that it made in connection with the sale
of the loan are breached, in the event of an early payment default, if the loan does not comply with the underwriting standards or
other requirements of the ultimate investor or an applicable insurer, or due to a delinquency or other matters arising in connection
with the loan. KB HOME Mortgage Company was not required to repurchase any loans in the past few years.
58
Note 4. Earnings Per Share
Basic and diluted earnings per share were calculated as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Numerator:
Net income
Less: Distributed earnings allocated to nonvested restricted stock
Less: Undistributed earnings allocated to nonvested restricted stock
Numerator for basic earnings per share
Effect of dilutive securities:
Years Ended November 30,
2016
2015
2014
$
$
105,615
(45)
(508)
105,062
$
84,643
(33)
(273)
84,337
918,349
(26)
(2,667)
915,656
Interest expense and amortization of debt issuance costs associated
with convertible senior notes, net of taxes
Add: Undistributed earnings allocated to nonvested restricted stock
Less: Undistributed earnings reallocated to nonvested restricted stock
2,667
508
(453)
2,667
273
(244)
2,667
2,667
(2,398)
Numerator for diluted earnings per share
$
107,784
$
87,033
$
918,592
Denominator:
Weighted average shares outstanding — basic
85,706
92,054
89,265
Effect of dilutive securities:
Share-based payments
Convertible senior notes
Weighted average shares outstanding — diluted
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
2,170
8,402
2,401
8,402
96,278
102,857
$
$
1.23
1.12
$
$
.92
.85
$
$
1,647
8,402
99,314
10.26
9.25
As discussed in Note 13 – Notes Payable, in 2013, we issued the 1.375% Convertible Senior Notes due 2019 that, from
issuance, have been convertible into shares of our common stock at a conversion rate of 36.5297 shares for each $1,000 principal
amount of the notes. Outstanding stock options to purchase 7.3 million, 8.0 million and 5.2 million shares of common stock were
excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculations for 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, because the effect of their inclusion
would be antidilutive. Contingently issuable shares associated with outstanding PSUs were not included in the basic earnings per
share calculations for the periods presented, as the applicable vesting conditions had not been satisfied.
Note 5. Receivables
Receivables consisted of the following (in thousands):
November 30,
2016
2015
Due from utility companies, improvement districts and municipalities (a)
$
102,780
$
Recoveries related to self-insurance claims (b)
Recoveries related to warranty and other claims (b)
Refundable deposits and bonds
Other
Subtotal
Allowance for doubtful accounts
Total
84,476
14,609
13,665
28,745
244,275
(12,610)
92,082
95,316
23,836
12,355
36,626
260,215
(12,217)
59
$
231,665
$
247,998
(a) These receivables typically relate to infrastructure improvements we make with respect to our communities. We are generally
reimbursed for the cost of such improvements when they are accepted by the utility company, improvement district or
municipality, or after certain events occur, depending on the terms of the applicable agreements. These events may include,
but are not limited to, the connection of utilities or the issuance of bonds by the respective improvement districts or
municipalities.
(b) As described in Note 15 – Commitments and Contingencies, in 2016, we reclassified estimated probable insurance and other
recoveries from our self-insurance liability to receivables for all years presented.
Note 6.
Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):
Homes under construction
Land under development
Land held for future development or sale (a)
Total
November 30,
2016
2015
$
1,245,938
$
1,031,356
1,727,657
429,633
1,766,045
516,346
$
3,403,228
$
3,313,747
(a) Land held for sale totaled $63.4 million at November 30, 2016 and $5.7 million at November 30, 2015.
Homes under construction is comprised of costs associated with homes in various stages of construction and includes direct
construction and related land acquisition and land development costs. Land under development primarily consists of land
acquisition and land development costs. Land development costs also include capitalized interest and real estate taxes. When
home construction begins, the associated land acquisition and land development costs are included in homes under construction.
Land held for future development principally reflects land acquisition and land development costs related to land where development
activity has been suspended or has not yet begun but is expected to occur in the future. These assets held for future development
are located in various submarkets where conditions do not presently support further investment or development, or are subject to
a building permit moratorium or regulatory restrictions, or are portions of larger land parcels that we plan to build out over several
years and/or that have not yet been entitled. We may also suspend development activity if we believe it will result in greater
returns and/or maximize the economic performance of a particular community by delaying improvements for a period of time to,
for instance, allow earlier phases of a long-term, multi-phase community or a neighboring community to generate or extend sales
momentum or for market conditions to improve. In some instances, we may activate or resume development activity for such
inventory to accelerate sales and/or our return on investment. We have activated assets previously held for future development
in certain markets as part of our strategic growth initiatives in 2016 and 2015. Land is generally considered held for sale when
management commits to a plan to sell the land; the land is available for immediate sale in its present condition; an active program
to locate a buyer and other actions required to complete the plan to sell have been initiated; the sale of the land is expected to be
completed within one year; the land is being actively marketed for sale at a price that is reasonable in relation to its current fair
value; and it is unlikely that the plan to sell will be withdrawn or that significant changes to the plan will be made. Interest and
real estate taxes are not capitalized on land held for future development or sale.
In the 2016 fourth quarter, we changed our strategy related to certain land parcels that were either held for future development
or under development and decided to monetize these assets through land sales, rather than build and sell homes on these parcels
as previously intended. These parcels, which were classified as land held for sale at November 30, 2016, included land in excess
of our near-term requirements; land where we now believe the necessary incremental investment in development is not justified;
land located in areas outside of our served markets; and/or land entitled for certain product types that are not aligned with our
primary product offerings. The majority of these land parcels are located in our Southeast homebuilding reporting segment. As
discussed in Note 7 – Inventory Impairments and Land Option Contract Abandonments, we recognized inventory impairment
charges to reduce the carrying values of these land parcels to their estimated fair values, less associated costs to sell.
Our interest costs were as follows (in thousands):
60
Years Ended November 30,
2016
2015
2014
Capitalized interest at beginning of year
$
288,442
$
266,668
$
Interest incurred
Interest expensed
Interest amortized to construction and land costs (a)
185,466
(5,900)
(161,285)
186,885
(21,856)
(143,255)
216,681
171,541
(30,750)
(90,804)
Capitalized interest at end of year (b)
$
306,723
$
288,442
$
266,668
(a) Interest amortized to construction and land costs for the years ended November 30, 2016 and 2015 included $.7 million and
$16.4 million, respectively, related to land sales during the periods.
(b) Capitalized interest amounts presented in the table reflect the gross amount of capitalized interest, as inventory impairment
charges recognized, if any, are not generally allocated to specific components of inventory.
Note 7.
Inventory Impairments and Land Option Contract Abandonments
Each community or land parcel in our owned inventory is assessed to determine if indicators of potential impairment exist.
Impairment indicators are assessed separately for each community or land parcel on a quarterly basis and include, but are not
limited to, the following: significant decreases in net orders, average selling prices, volume of homes delivered, gross profit margins
on homes delivered or projected gross profit margins on homes in backlog or future deliveries; significant increases in budgeted
land development and home construction costs or cancellation rates; or projected losses on expected future land sales. If indicators
of potential impairment exist for a community or land parcel, the identified asset is evaluated for recoverability. We evaluated
68, 35 and 32 communities or land parcels for recoverability during the years ended November 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014,
respectively. The carrying value of those communities or land parcels evaluated was $423.1 million, $286.3 million and $266.9
million during the years ended November 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The year-over-year increase in the number and
carrying value of communities evaluated for impairment in 2016 reflected our decisions to make changes in our operational
strategies for specific communities or land parcels aimed at more quickly monetizing our investment in those inventories, as
discussed further below. As impairment indicators are assessed on a quarterly basis, some of the communities or land parcels
evaluated during these years were evaluated in more than one quarterly period. Communities or land parcels evaluated for
recoverability in more than one quarterly period are counted only once for each applicable year. In some cases, we have recognized
inventory impairment charges for particular communities or land parcels in multiple years. Inventory impairment charges are
included in construction and land costs in our consolidated statements of operations.
When an indicator of potential impairment is identified for a community or land parcel, we test the asset for recoverability
by comparing the carrying value of the asset to the undiscounted future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. The
undiscounted future net cash flows are impacted by then-current conditions and trends in the market in which the asset is located
as well as factors known to us at the time the cash flows are calculated. These factors may include recent trends in our orders,
backlog, cancellation rates and volume of homes delivered, as well as our expectations related to the following: product offerings;
market supply and demand, including estimated average selling prices and related price appreciation; and land development, home
construction and overhead costs to be incurred and related cost inflation. With respect to the years ended November 30, 2016 and
2015, these expectations reflected our experience that, notwithstanding fluctuations in our company-wide net orders, backlog
levels, homes delivered and housing gross profit margin, on a year-over-year basis, conditions in the markets where assessed assets
were located have been generally stable or improved, with no significant deterioration identified or projected, as to revenue and
cost drivers that would prevent or otherwise impact recoverability. Based on this experience, and taking into account the generally
healthy conditions in many of our served markets for new home sales, excluding the Metro Washington, D.C. market, where we
began a wind down of our operations in 2016, our inventory assessments as of November 30, 2016 considered an expected steady
overall sales pace and average selling price performance for 2017 and beyond relative to the pace and performance in recent
quarters.
Given the inherent challenges and uncertainties in forecasting future results, our inventory assessments at the time they are
made take into consideration whether a community or land parcel is active, meaning whether it is open for sales and/or undergoing
development, or whether it is being held for future development or held for sale. Due to the short-term nature of active communities
and land held for sale, as compared to land held for future development, our inventory assessments generally assume the continuation
of then-current market conditions, subject to identifying information suggesting significant sustained changes in such conditions.
Our assessments of active communities, at the time made, generally anticipate net orders, average selling prices, volume of homes
delivered and costs for land development and home construction to continue at or near then-current levels through the particular
asset’s estimated remaining life. Inventory assessments for our land held for future development consider then-current market
61
conditions as well as subjective forecasts regarding the timing and costs of land development and home construction and related
cost inflation; the product(s) to be offered; and the net orders, volume of homes delivered, and selling prices and related price
appreciation of the offered product(s) when an associated community is anticipated to open for sales. We evaluate various factors
to develop these forecasts, including the availability of and demand for homes and finished lots within the relevant marketplace;
historical, current and expected future sales trends for the marketplace; and third-party data, if available. The estimates, expectations
and assumptions used in each of our inventory assessments are specific to each community or land parcel based on what we believe
are reasonable forecasts for their particular performance, and may vary among communities or land parcels and may vary over
time.
We record an inventory impairment charge on a community or land parcel that is active or held for future development when
its carrying value is greater than the undiscounted future net cash flows the asset is expected to generate. These real estate assets
are written down to fair value, which is primarily determined based on the estimated future net cash flows discounted for inherent
risk associated with each such asset, or other valuation techniques. Inputs used in our calculation of estimated discounted future
net cash flows are specific to each affected real estate asset and are based on our expectations for each such asset as of the applicable
measurement date, including, among others, expectations related to average selling prices and volume of homes delivered. The
discount rates we used were impacted by one or more of the following at the time the calculation was made: the risk-free rate of
return; expected risk premium based on estimated land development, home construction and delivery timelines; market risk from
potential future price erosion; cost uncertainty due to land development or home construction cost increases; and other risks specific
to the asset or conditions in the market in which the asset is located.
We record an inventory impairment charge on land held for sale when the carrying value of a land parcel is greater than its
fair value. These real estate assets are written down to fair value, less associated costs to sell. The estimated fair values of such
assets are generally based on bona fide letters of intent from outside parties, executed sales contracts, broker quotes or similar
information.
The following table summarizes ranges for significant quantitative unobservable inputs we utilized in our fair value
measurements with respect to impaired communities, other than land held for sale, written down to fair value during the years
presented:
Unobservable Input (a)
Average selling price
Deliveries per month
Discount rate
Years Ended November 30,
2016
2015
2014
$216,200 - $977,400
$178,100 - $509,400
$216,100 - $316,800
1 - 4
2 - 4
1 - 4
17% - 20%
17% - 20%
17% - 19%
(a) The ranges of inputs used in each period primarily reflect differences between the housing markets where each of the impacted
communities are located, rather than fluctuations in prevailing market conditions.
Based on the results of our evaluations, we recognized inventory impairment charges of $49.6 million in 2016 related to 30
communities or land parcels with a post-impairment fair value of $39.5 million that reflected our decisions to make changes in
our operational strategies for specific communities or land parcels aimed at more quickly monetizing our investment in those
inventories. Of these inventory impairment charges, $36.7 million related to certain land previously held for future development
that we decided in the 2016 fourth quarter to monetize through land sales as discussed in Note 6 – Inventories; land that we are
planning to sell in connection with the wind down of our Metro Washington, D.C. operations; and the sales of our last remaining
land parcels in the Rio Grande Valley area of Texas, which closed in the 2016 second quarter. The remaining $12.9 million of
inventory impairment charges reflected our decision to activate and thereby accelerate the overall timing for selling, building and
delivering homes in certain of our California, Arizona and Florida communities that were previously held for future development,
and to accelerate the overall pace for selling, building and delivering homes, primarily through lowering selling prices, at other
communities in California and Metro Washington, D.C. If we change our strategy for any given asset, it is possible that we may
recognize additional inventory impairment charges in the future.
In 2015, we recognized inventory impairment charges of $8.0 million related to four communities with a post-impairment
fair value of $12.0 million. We decided to change our operational strategy for these communities in order to monetize our investment
more quickly primarily through lowering home selling prices or by accelerating the overall timing and pace for selling, building
and delivering homes on land that had been held for future development. In 2014, we recognized inventory impairment charges
of $37.6 million associated with eight communities or land parcels with a post-impairment fair value of $30.6 million. Of these
charges, $26.6 million related to two properties, located in inland southern California and Atlanta, Georgia, where we decided to
change our strategy and monetize our investment through land sales rather than build and sell homes on the parcels as previously
intended. The remaining $11.0 million related to six communities primarily located in inland California and Arizona, reflecting
62
decisions we made to monetize our investment in these land positions sooner by accelerating the overall timing and pace for
selling, building and delivering homes on land that had been held for future development, and/or then-softening conditions in the
relevant submarkets.
As of November 30, 2016, the aggregate carrying value of our inventory that had been impacted by inventory impairment
charges was $215.3 million, representing 28 communities and various other land parcels. As of November 30, 2015, the aggregate
carrying value of our inventory that had been impacted by inventory impairment charges was $254.2 million, representing 28
communities and various other land parcels.
Our inventory controlled under land option contracts and other similar contracts is assessed to determine whether it continues
to meet our investment return standards. Assessments are made separately for each optioned land parcel on a quarterly basis and
are affected by the following factors relative to the market in which the asset is located, among others: current and/or anticipated
net orders, average selling prices and volume of homes delivered; estimated land development and home construction costs; and
projected profitability on expected future housing or land sales. When a decision is made not to exercise certain land option
contracts and other similar contracts due to market conditions and/or changes in our marketing strategy, we write off the related
inventory costs, including non-refundable deposits and unrecoverable pre-acquisition costs. Based on the results of our assessments,
we recognized land option contract abandonment charges of $3.2 million corresponding to 744 lots in 2016, $1.6 million
corresponding to 1,166 lots in 2015 and $1.8 million corresponding to 1,306 lots in 2014. Of the land option contract abandonment
charges recognized for 2016, $1.4 million related to the wind down of our Metro Washington, D.C. operations. Land option
contract abandonment charges are included in construction and land costs in our consolidated statements of operations.
The estimated remaining life of each community or land parcel in our inventory depends on various factors, such as the total
number of lots remaining; the expected timeline to acquire and entitle land and develop lots to build homes; the anticipated future
net order and cancellation rates; and the expected timeline to build and deliver homes sold. While it is difficult to determine a
precise timeframe for any particular inventory asset, based on current market conditions and expected delivery timelines, we
estimate our inventory assets’ remaining operating lives to range generally from one year to in excess of 10 years, and expect to
realize, on an overall basis, the majority of our inventory balance as of November 30, 2016 within five years.
Due to the judgment and assumptions applied in our inventory impairment and land option contract abandonment assessment
processes, and in our estimations of the remaining operating lives of our inventory assets and the realization of our inventory
balances, particularly as to land held for future development, it is possible that actual results could differ substantially from those
estimated.
Note 8. Variable Interest Entities
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures. We participate in joint ventures from time to time that conduct land acquisition, land
development and/or other homebuilding activities in various markets where our homebuilding operations are located. Our
investments in these joint ventures may create a variable interest in a VIE, depending on the contractual terms of the arrangement.
We analyze our joint ventures under the variable interest model to determine whether they are VIEs and, if so, whether we are the
primary beneficiary. Based on our analysis, we determined that one of our joint ventures at November 30, 2016 was a VIE, but
we were not the primary beneficiary of the VIE. At November 30, 2015, we determined that none of our joint ventures were VIEs.
All of our joint ventures at November 30, 2016 and 2015 were unconsolidated and accounted for under the equity method because
we did not have a controlling financial interest.
Land Option Contracts and Other Similar Contracts. In the ordinary course of our business, we enter into land option contracts
and other similar contracts with third parties and unconsolidated entities to acquire rights to land for the construction of homes.
The use of these contracts generally allows us to reduce the market risks associated with direct land ownership and development,
and reduce our capital and financial commitments, including interest and other carrying costs. Under these contracts, we typically
make a specified option payment or earnest money deposit in consideration for the right to purchase land in the future, usually at
a predetermined price.
We analyze each of our land option contracts and other similar contracts to determine whether the land seller is a VIE and, if
so, whether we are the primary beneficiary. Although we do not have legal title to the underlying land, we are required to consolidate
a VIE if we are the primary beneficiary. In determining whether we are the primary beneficiary, we consider, among other things,
whether we have the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance.
Such activities would include, among other things, determining or limiting the scope or purpose of the VIE, selling or transferring
property owned or controlled by the VIE, or arranging financing for the VIE. As a result of our analyses, we determined that as
of November 30, 2016 and 2015, we were not the primary beneficiary of any VIEs from which we have acquired rights to land
under land option contracts and other similar contracts. We perform ongoing reassessments of whether we are the primary
beneficiary of a VIE.
63
The following table presents a summary of our interests in land option contracts and other similar contracts (in thousands):
Unconsolidated VIEs
Other land option contracts and other similar contracts
Total
November 30, 2016
November 30, 2015
Cash
Deposits
Aggregate
Purchase Price
Cash
Deposits
Aggregate
Purchase Price
$
$
24,910
$
641,642
$
32,436
$
17,919
431,954
22,101
611,567
576,140
42,829
$
1,073,596
$
54,537
$
1,187,707
In addition to the cash deposits presented in the table above, our exposure to loss related to our land option contracts and other
similar contracts with third parties and unconsolidated entities consisted of pre-acquisition costs of $56.0 million at November 30,
2016 and $65.6 million at November 30, 2015. These pre-acquisition costs and cash deposits were included in inventories in our
consolidated balance sheets.
For land option contracts and other similar contracts where the land seller entity is not required to be consolidated under the
variable interest model, we consider whether such contracts should be accounted for as financing arrangements. Land option
contracts and other similar contracts that may be considered financing arrangements include those we enter into with third-party
land financiers or developers in conjunction with such third parties acquiring a specific land parcel(s) on our behalf, at our direction,
and those with other landowners where we or our designee make improvements to the optioned land parcel(s) during the applicable
option period. For these land option contracts and other similar contracts, we record the remaining purchase price of the associated
land parcel(s) in inventories on our consolidated balance sheet with a corresponding financing obligation if we determine that we
are effectively compelled to exercise the option under the land option contract and purchase the optioned land parcel(s). In making
this determination with respect to a land option contract, we consider the non-refundable deposit(s) we have made and any non-
reimbursable expenditures we have incurred for land improvement activities or other items up to the assessment date; additional
costs associated with abandoning the contract; and our commitments, if any, to incur non-reimbursable costs associated with the
contract. As a result of our evaluations of land option contracts and other similar contracts for financing arrangements, we recorded
inventories in our consolidated balance sheets, with a corresponding increase to accrued expenses and other liabilities, of $50.5
million at November 30, 2016 and $110.0 million at November 30, 2015.
Note 9.
Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
We have investments in unconsolidated joint ventures that conduct land acquisition, land development and/or other
homebuilding activities in various markets where our homebuilding operations are located. We and our unconsolidated joint
venture partners make initial and/or ongoing capital contributions to these unconsolidated joint ventures, typically on a pro rata
basis, according to our respective equity interests. The obligations to make capital contributions are governed by each such
unconsolidated joint venture’s respective operating agreement and related governing documents. Our partners in these
unconsolidated joint ventures are unrelated homebuilders, and/or land developers and other real estate entities, or commercial
enterprises. These investments are designed primarily to reduce market and development risks and to increase the number of lots
we own or control. In some instances, participating in unconsolidated joint ventures has enabled us to acquire and develop land
that we might not otherwise have had access to due to a project’s size, financing needs, duration of development or other
circumstances. While we consider our participation in unconsolidated joint ventures as potentially beneficial to our homebuilding
activities, we do not view such participation as essential.
We typically have obtained rights to acquire portions of the land held by the unconsolidated joint ventures in which we
currently participate. When an unconsolidated joint venture sells land to our homebuilding operations, we defer recognition of
our share of such unconsolidated joint venture’s earnings (losses) until a home sale is closed and title passes to a homebuyer, at
which time we account for those earnings (losses) as a reduction (increase) to the cost of purchasing the land from the unconsolidated
joint venture. We defer recognition of our share of such unconsolidated joint venture losses only to the extent profits are to be
generated from the sale of the home to a homebuyer.
We share in the earnings (losses) of these unconsolidated joint ventures generally in accordance with our respective equity
interests. In some instances, we recognize earnings (losses) related to our investment in an unconsolidated joint venture that differ
from our equity interest in the unconsolidated joint venture. This typically arises from our deferral of the unconsolidated joint
venture’s earnings (losses) from land sales to us, or other items.
The following table presents combined condensed information from the statements of operations of our unconsolidated joint
ventures (in thousands):
64
Revenues
Construction and land costs
Other expenses, net
Income (loss)
Years Ended November 30,
2016
2015
2014
$
$
$
46,389
(50,566)
(4,465)
$
15,322
(23,123)
(3,360)
12,538
(10,790)
(1,476)
(8,642) $
(11,161) $
272
For the years ended November 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, combined revenues and construction and land costs were generated
primarily from land sales.
The following table presents combined condensed balance sheet information for our unconsolidated joint ventures (in
thousands):
Assets
Cash
Receivables
Inventories
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities and equity
Accounts payable and other liabilities
Notes payable (a)
Equity
Total liabilities and equity
November 30,
2016
2015
$
$
$
$
$
31,928
882
165,385
629
23,309
7,546
175,196
910
198,824
$
206,961
19,880
$
44,381
134,563
17,108
39,064
150,789
198,824
$
206,961
(a) One of our unconsolidated joint ventures has a construction loan agreement with a third-party lender to finance its land
development activities that is secured by the underlying property and related project assets. Outstanding debt under the
agreement is non-recourse to us and is scheduled to mature in August 2018. None of our other unconsolidated joint ventures
had outstanding debt at November 30, 2016 or 2015.
The following table presents additional information relating to our investments in unconsolidated joint ventures (dollars in
thousands):
Number of investments in unconsolidated joint ventures
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures
Number of unconsolidated joint venture lots controlled under
land option contracts and other similar contracts
November 30,
2016
2015
7
7
$
64,016
$
71,558
471
677
We and our partner in the unconsolidated joint venture that has the construction loan agreement described above provided
certain guarantees and indemnities to the lender, including a guaranty to complete the construction of improvements for the project;
a guaranty against losses the lender suffers due to certain bad acts or failures to act by the unconsolidated joint venture or its
partners; a guaranty of interest payments on the outstanding balance of the secured debt under the construction loan agreement;
and an indemnity of the lender from environmental issues. In each case, our actual responsibility under the foregoing guaranty
and indemnity obligations is limited to our pro rata interest in the unconsolidated joint venture. We do not have a guaranty or any
other obligation to repay or to support the value of the collateral underlying the unconsolidated joint venture’s outstanding secured
debt under the construction loan agreement. However, various financial and non-financial covenants apply with respect to the
outstanding secured debt and the related guaranty and indemnity obligations, and a failure to comply with such covenants could
65
result in a default and cause the lender to seek to enforce such guaranty and indemnity obligations, if and as may be applicable.
As of November 30, 2016, we were in compliance with the applicable terms of our relevant covenants with respect to the construction
loan agreement. We do not believe that our existing exposure under our guaranty and indemnity obligations related to the
unconsolidated joint venture’s outstanding secured debt is material to our consolidated financial statements.
Of the unconsolidated joint venture lots controlled under land option contracts and other similar contracts at November 30,
2016, we are committed to purchase 121 lots from one of our unconsolidated joint ventures in quarterly takedowns over the next
four years for an aggregate purchase price of $53.0 million under agreements that we entered into with the unconsolidated joint
venture in 2016.
Note 10. Other Assets
Other assets consisted of the following (in thousands):
Cash surrender value of insurance contracts
Property and equipment, net
Prepaid expenses
Debt issuance costs (a)
Total
November 30,
2016
2015
$
$
70,829
$
14,240
4,894
1,182
91,145
$
67,786
13,100
6,480
1,626
88,992
(a) As described in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, in connection with our adoption of ASU 2015-03
effective November 30, 2016, unamortized debt issuance costs associated with our senior notes were retrospectively reclassified
from other assets to notes payable in our consolidated balance sheets. The debt issuance costs reflected are associated with
our Credit Facility.
Note 11. Accrued Expenses and Other Liabilities
Accrued expenses and other liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):
Self-insurance and other litigation liabilities (a)
Employee compensation and related benefits
Inventory-related obligations (b)
Accrued interest payable
Warranty liability
Customer deposits
Real estate and business taxes
Other
Total
November 30,
2016
2015
$
170,988
$
130,352
82,682
67,411
56,682
18,175
14,370
10,336
191,812
114,456
148,887
62,645
49,085
14,563
14,255
13,027
$
550,996
$
608,730
(a) As described in Note 15 – Commitments and Contingencies, in 2016, we reclassified estimated probable insurance and other
recoveries from our self-insurance liability to receivables for all years presented.
(b) Represents liabilities for inventory not owned associated with financing arrangements discussed in Note 8 – Variable Interest
Entities, as well as liabilities for fixed or determinable amounts associated with TIFE assessments. As homes are delivered,
the obligation to pay the remaining TIFE assessments associated with each underlying lot is transferred to the homebuyer.
As such, these assessment obligations will be paid by us only to the extent we do not deliver homes on applicable lots before
the related TIFE obligations mature.
66
Note 12. Income Taxes
Income Tax Benefit (Expense). The components of the income tax benefit (expense) in our consolidated statements of operations
are as follows (in thousands):
2016
Current
Deferred
Income tax expense
2015
Current
Deferred
Income tax expense
2014
Current
Deferred
Income tax benefit
Federal
State
Total
(1,900) $
(28,700)
(1,000) $
(12,100)
(2,900)
(40,800)
(30,600) $
(13,100) $
(43,700)
(1,400) $
(35,900)
(2,000) $
(3,100)
(3,400)
(39,000)
(37,300) $
(5,100) $
(42,400)
100
646,000
$
(1,900) $
179,200
(1,800)
825,200
646,100
$
177,300
$
823,400
$
$
$
$
$
$
Our income tax expense for 2016 and 2015 reflected the favorable net impact of $15.2 million and $5.6 million, respectively,
of federal energy tax credits we earned from building energy-efficient homes, resulting in effective tax rates of 29.3% for 2016
and 33.4% for 2015. The income tax benefit in 2014 was primarily due to the reversal of a substantial portion of our deferred tax
asset valuation allowance at November 30, 2014. Due to the effects of our deferred tax asset valuation allowance and changes in
our unrecognized tax benefits, our effective tax rate in 2014 was not a meaningful item as our income tax amount was not directly
correlated to our pretax income for that period.
The majority of the federal energy tax credits for 2016 resulted from legislation enacted on December 18, 2015. Among other
things, this legislation extended the availability of a business tax credit for building new energy-efficient homes through December
31, 2016. Prior to this legislation, the tax credit expired on December 31, 2014. The federal energy tax credits for 2015 were
earned primarily from building energy-efficient homes in prior periods based on legislation enacted on December 19, 2014, which
permitted retroactive application of the credits.
Deferred Tax Assets, Net. Deferred income taxes result from temporary differences in the financial and tax basis of assets
and liabilities. Significant components of our deferred tax liabilities and assets are as follows (in thousands):
Deferred tax liabilities:
Capitalized expenses
State taxes
Other
Total
November 30,
2016
2015
$
$
116,551
$
65,766
286
110,408
68,866
196
182,603
$
179,470
67
Deferred tax assets:
NOLs from 2006 through 2016
Tax credits
Inventory impairment and land option contract abandonment charges
Employee benefits
Warranty, legal and other accruals
Capitalized expenses
Partnerships and joint ventures
Depreciation and amortization
Other
Total
Valuation allowance
Total
Deferred tax assets, net
November 30,
2016
2015
$
350,329
$
197,766
176,555
102,321
51,448
36,950
16,293
8,530
6,196
946,388
(24,800)
423,274
186,169
179,828
93,395
49,655
34,887
18,557
9,146
4,537
999,448
(37,782)
921,588
961,666
$
738,985
$
782,196
Reconciliation of Expected Income Tax Benefit (Expense). The income tax benefit (expense) computed at the statutory
U.S. federal income tax rate and the income tax benefit (expense) provided in our consolidated statements of operations differ as
follows (dollars in thousands):
Years Ended November 30,
2016
2015
2014
$
%
$
%
$
%
Income tax expense computed at statutory rate
$
(52,260)
(35.0)% $
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
Tax credits
Depreciation and amortization
Basis in unconsolidated joint ventures
NOL reconciliation
State taxes, net of federal income tax benefit
Other, net
12,982
4,447
1,842
(86)
(3,691)
(7,511)
577
8.7
3.0
1.2
(0.1)
(2.5)
(5.0)
.4
(44,462)
3,356
6,926
3,183
1,617
(3,379)
(5,155)
(4,486)
(35.0)% $
2.6
5.5
2.5
1.3
(2.7)
(4.1)
(3.5)
(33,232)
825,232
(35.0)%
869.1
1,875
15,765
10,441
12,973
(13,907)
4,253
2.0
16.6
11.0
13.7
(14.7)
4.5
Income tax benefit (expense)
$
(43,700)
(29.3)% $
(42,400)
(33.4)% $
823,400
867.2 %
Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance. We evaluate our deferred tax assets quarterly to determine if adjustments to our
valuation allowance are required based on the consideration of all available positive and negative evidence using a “more likely
than not” standard with respect to whether deferred tax assets will be realized. Our evaluation considers, among other factors, our
historical operating results, our expectation of future profitability, the duration of the applicable statutory carryforward periods,
and conditions in the housing market and the broader economy. In our evaluation, we give more significant weight to evidence
that is objective in nature as compared to subjective evidence. Also, more significant weight is given to evidence that directly
relates to our then-current financial performance as compared to indirect or less current evidence. The ultimate realization of our
deferred tax assets depends primarily on our ability to generate future taxable income during the periods in which the related
temporary differences in the financial basis and the tax basis of the assets become deductible. The value of our deferred tax assets
in our consolidated balance sheets depends on applicable income tax rates.
Our deferred tax assets of $763.8 million at November 30, 2016 and $820.0 million at November 30, 2015 were partially
offset by valuation allowances of $24.8 million and $37.8 million, respectively. The deferred tax asset valuation allowance at
November 30, 2016 was primarily related to certain state NOLs that had not met the “more likely than not” realization standard
at that date. The valuation allowance at November 30, 2015 was mainly related to foreign tax credits and certain state NOLs that
had not met the “more likely than not” realization standard as of that date. As of November 30, 2016, we needed to generate
68
approximately $1.8 billion of pretax income in future periods before 2036 to realize our deferred tax assets. Based on the evaluation
of our deferred tax assets as of November 30, 2016, we determined that most of our deferred tax assets would be realized. In 2016,
we reduced our valuation allowance by $13.0 million, which reflected the expiration of foreign tax credits and the release of a
valuation allowance associated with state NOLs that met the “more likely than not” realization standard, partly offset by the
establishment of a valuation allowance for state NOLs related to the wind down of our Metro Washington, D.C. operations. In
2015, the valuation allowance was reduced by $3.4 million to account for the expiration of foreign tax credits and state NOLs that
were not utilized.
At November 30, 2014, we determined through our evaluation process that it was more likely than not that most of our deferred
tax assets would be realized. As a result, we recognized an $824.2 million income tax benefit in the 2014 fourth quarter, which
included the reversal of all but $41.2 million of our deferred tax asset valuation allowance. The principal positive evidence that
led us to determine at November 30, 2014 that most of our deferred tax asset valuation allowance could be reversed included our
emergence from a three-year cumulative pretax loss position in 2014 as well as the underlying momentum in our business and
generally improved housing market and broader economic conditions that had enabled us to achieve and maintain a three-year
cumulative pretax income position as of and after the 2014 third quarter; the significant pretax income we generated during 2014
and 2013, including six consecutive quarters of pretax income as of November 30, 2014; improvement in key financial metrics in
2014 when compared to the previous year (including in our revenues; housing gross profits; selling, general and administrative
expenses as a percentage of housing revenues; net orders and backlog); our expectation of future profitability; our strong financial
position; significant evidence that conditions in the U.S. housing industry at the time were more favorable than they had been in
the then-recent past and our belief that such conditions would continue to be favorable over the long term; and our belief that we
would be able to make operational adjustments to address any potential changes in market conditions to maintain long-term
profitability and realize our deferred tax assets.
We will continue to evaluate both the positive and negative evidence on a quarterly basis in determining the need for a valuation
allowance with respect to our deferred tax assets. The accounting for deferred tax assets is based upon estimates of future results.
Changes in positive and negative evidence, including differences between estimated and actual results, could result in changes in
the valuation of our deferred tax assets that could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. Changes in
existing federal and state tax laws and corporate income tax rates could also affect actual tax results and the realization of deferred
tax assets over time.
The majority of the tax benefits associated with our NOLs can be carried forward for 20 years (as we did not have taxable
income in the allowable two-year carryback period) and applied to offset future taxable income. The federal NOL carryforwards
of $204.2 million, if not utilized, will begin to expire in 2030 through 2033. Depending on their applicable statutory period, the
state NOL carryforwards of $146.1 million, if not utilized, will begin to expire between 2017 and 2036. State NOL carryforwards
of $.5 million and $1.7 million expired in 2016 and 2015, respectively.
In addition, $104.9 million of our tax credits, if not utilized, will begin to expire in 2026 through 2036. Included in the $104.9
million are $3.2 million of investment tax credits, of which $2.4 million and $.8 million will expire in 2026 and 2027, respectively.
Unrecognized Tax Benefits. Gross unrecognized tax benefits are the differences between a tax position taken or expected to
be taken in a tax return, and the benefit recognized for accounting purposes. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances
of gross unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, is as follows (in thousands):
Balance at beginning of year
Reductions due to lapse of statute of limitations
Balance at end of year
Years Ended November 30,
2016
2015
2014
$
$
56
—
56
$
$
$
206
(150)
56
$
206
—
206
We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in our consolidated financial statements as
a component of the provision for or benefit from income taxes. As of each of November 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, there was a
balance of $.1 million of gross unrecognized tax benefits (including interest and penalties) that, if recognized, would affect our
annual effective tax rate. Our liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits at November 30, 2016 and 2015 are included in accrued
expenses and other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets.
As of November 30, 2016 and 2015, there were no tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but the
timing of such deductibility is uncertain. Our total accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized income tax benefits was
zero at both November 30, 2016 and 2015. Because of the impact of deferred tax accounting, other than interest and penalties,
69
the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect our annual effective tax rate, but would accelerate the payment
of cash to a tax authority to an earlier period.
As of November 30, 2016, our gross unrecognized tax benefits (including interest and penalties) totaled $.1 million. We
anticipate that these gross unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by an amount ranging from zero to $.1 million during the
12 months from this reporting date due to the expiration of the applicable statute of limitations. The fiscal years ending 2013 and
later remain open to federal examinations, while 2012 and later remain open to state examinations.
Notwithstanding the reversal of a substantial portion of our deferred tax asset valuation allowance at November 30, 2014, the
benefits of our deferred tax assets, including our NOLs, built-in losses and tax credits would be reduced or potentially eliminated
if we experienced an “ownership change” under Section 382. Based on our analysis performed as of November 30, 2016, we do
not believe that we have experienced an ownership change as defined by Section 382, and, therefore, the NOLs, built-in losses
and tax credits we have generated should not be subject to a Section 382 limitation as of this reporting date.
Note 13. Notes Payable
Notes payable consisted of the following (in thousands):
November 30,
2016
2015
Mortgages and land contracts due to land sellers and other loans (at interest rates of 1% to
7% at November 30, 2016 and 4% to 7% at November 30, 2015)
$
66,927
$
9.10% Senior notes due September 15, 2017
7 1/4% Senior notes due June 15, 2018
4.75% Senior notes due May 15, 2019
8.00% Senior notes due March 15, 2020
7.00% Senior notes due December 15, 2021
7.50% Senior notes due September 15, 2022
7.625% Senior notes due May 15, 2023
1.375% Convertible senior notes due February 1, 2019
263,932
299,647
397,364
344,811
445,911
346,774
247,404
227,379
35,664
262,570
299,431
396,309
343,327
445,079
346,204
247,000
226,170
Total
$
2,640,149
$
2,601,754
The senior note and convertible senior note balances in the table above reflect our adoption of ASU 2015-03, as described in
Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. Debt issuance costs that were deducted from the carrying amounts of the
applicable senior notes totaled $18.3 million at November 30, 2016 and $23.8 million at November 30, 2015. The carrying amounts
of the senior notes listed above are also net of any unamortized discounts.
Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility. We have a $275.0 million Credit Facility that will mature on August 7, 2019. The Credit
Facility contains an uncommitted accordion feature under which its aggregate principal amount of available loans can be increased
to a maximum of $450.0 million under certain conditions, including obtaining additional bank commitments. The Credit Facility
also contains a sublimit of $137.5 million for the issuance of letters of credit, which may be utilized in combination with, or to
replace, the LOC Facility. Interest on amounts borrowed under the Credit Facility is payable quarterly in arrears at a rate based
on either a Eurodollar or a base rate, plus a spread that depends on our Leverage Ratio, as defined under the Credit Facility. The
Credit Facility also requires the payment of a commitment fee ranging from .30% to .50% of the unused commitment, based on
our Leverage Ratio. The terms of the Credit Facility require us, among other things, to maintain compliance with various covenants,
including financial covenants relating to our consolidated tangible net worth, Leverage Ratio, and either an Interest Coverage
Ratio or a minimum level of liquidity, each as defined therein. The amount of the Credit Facility available for cash borrowings
or the issuance of letters of credit depends on the total cash borrowings and letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Facility
and the maximum available amount under the terms of the Credit Facility. As of November 30, 2016, we had no cash borrowings
and $31.0 million of letters of credit outstanding under the Credit Facility. Therefore, as of November 30, 2016, we had $244.0
million available for cash borrowings under the Credit Facility, with up to $106.5 million of that amount available for the issuance
of additional letters of credit.
LOC Facility. We maintain the LOC Facility with a financial institution to obtain letters of credit from time to time in the
ordinary course of operating our business. We had no letters of credit outstanding under the LOC Facility at November 30, 2016
and $9.1 million outstanding at November 30, 2015. The LOC Facility requires us to deposit and maintain cash with the issuing
financial institution as collateral for our letters of credit outstanding.
70
Mortgages and Land Contracts Due to Land Sellers and Other Loans. As of November 30, 2016, inventories having a carrying
value of $181.8 million were pledged to collateralize mortgages and land contracts due to land sellers and other loans.
Shelf Registration. Issuances of debt and equity securities under our 2014 Shelf Registration require the filing of a prospectus
supplement identifying the amount and terms of the securities to be issued. Our ability to issue equity and/or debt is subject to
market conditions and other factors impacting our borrowing capacity.
Senior Notes. All of our senior notes outstanding at November 30, 2016 and 2015 represent senior unsecured obligations and
rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing and future indebtedness. All of our outstanding senior notes were issued
in underwritten public offerings.
The key terms of each of our senior notes outstanding as of November 30, 2016 were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Notes Payable
Principal
Issuance Date
Maturity Date
9.10% Senior notes
7 1/4% Senior notes
4.75% Senior notes
8.00% Senior notes
7.00% Senior notes
7.50% Senior notes
7.625% Senior notes
$
265,000
300,000
400,000
350,000
July 30, 2009
September 15, 2017
April 3, 2006
March 25, 2014
June 15, 2018
May 15, 2019
February 7, 2012
March 15, 2020
450,000
October 29, 2013
December 15, 2021
350,000
July 31, 2012
September 15, 2022
250,000
February 17, 2015
May 15, 2023
1.375% Convertible senior notes
230,000
January 29, 2013
February 1, 2019
Redeemable
Prior to
Maturity
Effective
Interest Rate
Yes (a)
Yes (a)
Yes (b)
Yes (a)
Yes (b)
Yes (a)
Yes (b)
Yes (c)
9.6%
7.3
5.0
8.5
7.2
7.7
7.8
1.9
(a) At our option, these notes may be redeemed, in whole at any time or from time to time in part, at a redemption price equal to
the greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount of the notes being redeemed and (ii) the sum of the present values of the
remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on the notes being redeemed (exclusive of interest accrued to the
applicable redemption date), discounted to the redemption date at a defined rate, plus, in each case, accrued and unpaid interest
on the notes being redeemed to the applicable redemption date.
(b) At our option, these notes may be redeemed, in whole at any time or from time to time in part, at a redemption price equal to
the greater of (i) 100% of the principal amount of the notes being redeemed and (ii) the sum of the present values of the
remaining scheduled payments of principal and interest on the notes being redeemed (exclusive of interest accrued to the
applicable redemption date), discounted to the redemption date at a defined rate, plus, in each case, accrued and unpaid interest
on the notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the applicable redemption date, except that three months prior to the stated
maturity dates for the 4.75% Senior Notes due 2019 and the 7.00% Senior Notes due 2021 and until their respective maturity,
and six months prior to the stated maturity date for the 7.625% Senior Notes due 2023 and until their maturity, the redemption
price will be equal to 100% of the principal amount of the notes being redeemed, plus, in each case, accrued and unpaid interest
on the notes being redeemed to, but excluding, the applicable redemption date.
(c) We may not redeem the notes prior to November 6, 2018. On or after November 6, 2018, and prior to the stated maturity
date, we may, at our option, redeem all or part of the notes at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of
the notes being redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding the redemption date.
If a change in control occurs as defined in the instruments governing our senior notes, we would be required to offer to purchase
all of our outstanding senior notes (with the exception of the amount outstanding related to our 7 1/4% Senior Notes due 2018) at
101% of their principal amount, together with all accrued and unpaid interest, if any. If a fundamental change, as defined in the
instruments governing the 1.375% Convertible Senior Notes due 2019, occurs prior to the stated maturity date, the holders may
require us to purchase for cash all or any portion of their 1.375% Convertible Senior Notes due 2019 at 100% of the principal
amount of the notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest to, but not including, the fundamental change purchase date.
In 2015, we used a portion of the total net proceeds of $245.4 million from the issuance of the 7.625% Senior Notes due 2023
to retire the remaining $199.9 million in aggregate principal amount of our 6 1/4% Senior Notes due 2015 at their maturity on
June 15, 2015. The remainder of the net proceeds was used for general corporate purposes, including working capital, land
acquisition and land development.
71
In 2014, we used the $394.6 million in total net proceeds from the issuance of the 4.75% Senior Notes due 2019 together with
the total net proceeds from a concurrent underwritten public offering of our common stock, which is discussed below in Note 17 –
Stockholders’ Equity, for general corporate purposes, including land acquisition and land development.
At any time prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding the maturity date, holders may convert
all or any portion of the 1.375% Convertible Senior Notes due 2019. These notes are initially convertible into shares of our common
stock at a conversion rate of 36.5297 shares for each $1,000 principal amount of the notes, which represents an initial conversion
price of approximately $27.37 per share. This initial conversion rate equates to 8,401,831 shares of our common stock and is
subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events, including: subdivisions and combinations of our common stock; the
issuance of stock dividends, or certain rights, options or warrants, capital stock, indebtedness, assets or cash dividends to all or
substantially all holders of our common stock; and certain issuer tender or exchange offers. The conversion rate will not, however,
be adjusted for other events, such as a third party tender or exchange offer or an issuance of common stock for cash or an acquisition,
that may adversely affect the trading price of the notes or our common stock. On conversion, holders of the 1.375% Convertible
Senior Notes due 2019 will not be entitled to receive cash in lieu of shares of our common stock, except for cash in lieu of fractional
shares. We maintain 12,602,735 shares of our common stock to meet conversions if and when they occur. This represents the
maximum number of shares of our common stock potentially deliverable upon conversion to holders of the 1.375% Convertible
Senior Notes due 2019 based on the terms of their governing instruments. The maximum number of shares would potentially be
deliverable to holders only in certain limited circumstances as set forth in the instruments governing these notes.
The indenture governing the senior notes does not contain any financial covenants. Subject to specified exceptions, the
indenture contains certain restrictive covenants that, among other things, limit our ability to incur secured indebtedness, or engage
in sale-leaseback transactions involving property or assets above a certain specified value. In addition, the senior notes (with the
exception of the 7 1/4% Senior Notes due 2018) contain certain limitations related to mergers, consolidations, and sales of assets.
As of November 30, 2016, we were in compliance with the applicable terms of all our covenants and other requirements under
the Credit Facility, the senior notes, the indenture, and the mortgages and land contracts due to land sellers and other loans. Our
ability to access the Credit Facility for cash borrowings and letters of credit and our ability to secure future debt financing depend,
in part, on our ability to remain in such compliance. There are no agreements that restrict our payment of dividends other than to
maintain compliance with the financial covenant requirements under the Credit Facility, which would restrict our payment of
dividends if a default under the Credit Facility exists at the time of any such payment, or if any such payment would result in such
a default.
Principal payments on senior notes, mortgages and land contracts due to land sellers and other loans are due during each year
ended November 30 as follows: 2017 — $331.9 million; 2018 — $300.0 million; 2019 — $630.0 million; 2020 — $350.0 million;
2021 — $0; and thereafter — $1.05 billion.
Note 14. Fair Value Disclosures
Fair value measurements of assets and liabilities are categorized based on the following hierarchy:
Level 1
Fair value determined based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2
Fair value determined using significant observable inputs, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities or
quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted
prices that are observable for the asset or liability, or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by
observable market data, by correlation or other means.
Level 3
Fair value determined using significant unobservable inputs, such as pricing models, discounted cash flows, or
similar techniques.
Fair value measurements are used for inventories on a nonrecurring basis when events and circumstances indicate that their
carrying value is not recoverable. The following table presents the fair value hierarchy and our assets measured at fair value on
a nonrecurring basis (in thousands):
Description
Inventories (a)
Inventories (a)
Fair Value
Hierarchy
Level 2
Level 3
For the Years Ended November 30,
2016
2015
$
3,657
$
37,329
—
11,988
72
(a) Amounts represent the aggregate fair value for real estate assets impacted by inventory impairment charges during the
applicable period, as of the date that the fair value measurements were made. The carrying value for these real estate assets
may have subsequently increased or decreased from the fair value reflected due to activity that has occurred since the
measurement date.
Inventories with a carrying value of $89.1 million were written down to their fair value, less associated costs to sell (where
applicable), of $39.5 million during the year ended November 30, 2016, resulting in inventory impairment charges of $49.6 million.
Inventories with a carrying value of $20.0 million were written down to their fair value of $12.0 million during the year ended
November 30, 2015, resulting in inventory impairment charges of $8.0 million.
The fair values for inventories that were determined using Level 2 inputs were based on bona fide letters of intent from outside
parties or executed sales contracts. The fair values for inventories that were determined using Level 3 inputs were primarily based
on the estimated future net cash flows discounted for inherent risk associated with each underlying asset, or, with respect to planned
future land sales, were based on broker quotes.
The following table presents the fair value hierarchy, carrying values and estimated fair values of our financial instruments,
except those for which the carrying values approximate fair values (in thousands):
Financial Liabilities:
Senior notes (a)
November 30,
2016
2015
Fair Value
Hierarchy
Carrying
Value
Estimated
Fair Value
Carrying
Value
Estimated
Fair Value
Level 2
$ 2,345,843
$ 2,494,844
$ 2,339,920
$ 2,429,850
Convertible senior notes (a)
Level 2
227,379
223,675
226,170
211,313
(a) The carrying values for the senior notes and convertible senior notes, as presented, include unamortized debt issuance costs.
Debt issuance costs are not factored into the estimated fair values of these notes.
The fair values of our senior notes and convertible senior notes are generally estimated based on quoted market prices for
these instruments. The carrying values reported for cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, and mortgages and land contracts
due to land sellers and other loans approximate fair values.
Note 15. Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments and contingencies include typical obligations of homebuilders for the completion of contracts and those incurred
in the ordinary course of business.
Warranty. We provide a limited warranty on all of our homes. The specific terms and conditions of our limited warranty
program vary depending upon the markets in which we do business. We generally provide a structural warranty of 10 years, a
warranty on electrical, heating, cooling, plumbing and certain other building systems each varying from two to five years based
on geographic market and state law, and a warranty of one year for other components of the home. Our limited warranty program
is ordinarily how we respond to and account for homeowners’ requests to local division offices seeking repairs of certain conditions
or defects, including claims where we could have liability under applicable state statutes or tort law for a defective condition in
or damages to a home. Our warranty liability covers our costs of repairs associated with homeowner claims made under our limited
warranty program. These claims for repairs of certain conditions or defects are generally made directly by a homeowner and
involve their individual home.
We estimate the costs that may be incurred under each limited warranty and record a liability in the amount of such costs at
the time the revenue associated with the sale of each home is recognized. Our primary assumption in estimating the amounts we
accrue for warranty costs is that historical claims experience is a strong indicator of future claims experience. Factors that affect
our warranty liability include the number of homes delivered, historical and anticipated rates of warranty claims, and cost per
claim. We periodically assess the adequacy of our accrued warranty liability, which is included in accrued expenses and other
liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets, and adjust the amount as necessary based on our assessment. Our assessment includes
the review of our actual warranty costs incurred to identify trends and changes in our warranty claims experience, and considers
our home construction quality and customer service initiatives and outside events. While we believe the warranty liability currently
reflected in our consolidated balance sheets to be adequate, unanticipated changes or developments in the legal environment, local
weather, land or environmental conditions, quality of materials or methods used in the construction of homes or customer service
73
practices and/or our warranty claims experience could have a significant impact on our actual warranty costs in future periods and
such amounts could differ significantly from our current estimates.
The changes in our warranty liability are as follows (in thousands):
Balance at beginning of year
Warranties issued
Payments (a)
Adjustments (b)
Balance at end of year
Years Ended November 30,
2016
2015
2014
$
$
49,085
$
45,196
$
30,135
(23,190)
652
23,018
(26,367)
7,238
48,704
18,479
(39,458)
17,471
56,682
$
49,085
$
45,196
(a) Payments for 2016, 2015 and 2014 included $2.3 million, $8.4 million and $26.6 million, respectively, to repair homes affected
by water intrusion-related issues in certain of our communities in central and southwest Florida.
(b) Adjustments for 2016, 2015 and 2014 included the reclassification of certain estimated minimum probable recoveries to
receivables in connection with the above-noted water intrusion-related issues. Adjustments in 2014 also included the
reclassification of estimated minimum probable recoveries to establish a separate accrual for a water intrusion-related inquiry,
as described below. The adjustments for each year had no impact on our consolidated statements of operations. There were
no estimated minimum probable recoveries netted against our warranty liability at November 30, 2016.
Florida Attorney General’s Office Inquiry. In 2013, we were notified by the Florida Attorney General’s Office that it was
making a preliminary inquiry into the status of our communities in Florida which were affected by water intrusion-related issues.
We established an accrual for the estimated minimum probable loss with respect to this inquiry during 2014 and increased the
accrual during 2015. This inquiry was resolved through an agreement with the Florida Attorney General’s Office that was approved
by a Florida circuit court and became effective in February 2016. The amount accrued as of November 30, 2015 was adequate
based on the terms of the approved agreement. We paid a stipulated amount to the Florida Attorney General’s Office under the
agreement in March 2016.
Guarantees. In the normal course of our business, we issue certain representations, warranties and guarantees related to our
home and land sales. Based on historical experience, we do not believe any potential liability with respect to these representations,
warranties or guarantees would be material to our consolidated financial statements.
Self-Insurance. We maintain, and require the majority of our independent subcontractors to maintain, general liability insurance
(including construction defect and bodily injury coverage) and workers’ compensation insurance. These insurance policies protect
us against a portion of our risk of loss from claims related to our homebuilding activities, subject to certain self-insured retentions,
deductibles and other coverage limits. We also maintain certain other insurance policies. In Arizona, California, Colorado and
Nevada, our subcontractors’ general liability insurance primarily takes the form of a wrap-up policy under a program where eligible
independent subcontractors are enrolled as insureds on each community. Enrolled subcontractors contribute toward the cost of
the insurance and agree to pay a contractual amount in the future if there is a claim related to their work. To the extent provided
under the wrap-up program, we absorb the enrolled subcontractors’ general liability associated with the work performed on our
homes within the applicable community as part of our overall general liability insurance and our self-insurance.
We self-insure a portion of our overall risk through the use of a captive insurance subsidiary, which provides coverage for our
exposure to certain construction defect, bodily injury and property damage claims and related litigation or regulatory actions, up
to certain limits. Our self-insurance liability generally covers the costs of settlements and/or repairs, if any, as well as our costs
to defend and resolve the following types of claims:
• Construction defect: Construction defect claims, which represent the largest component of our self-insurance liability,
typically originate through a legal or regulatory process rather than directly by a homeowner and involve the alleged
occurrence of a condition affecting two or more homes within the same community, or they involve a common area or
homeowners’ association property within a community. These claims typically involve higher costs to resolve than
individual homeowner warranty claims, and the rate of claims is highly variable.
• Bodily injury: Bodily injury claims typically involve individuals (other than our employees) who claim they were injured
while on our property or as a result of our operations.
74
• Property damage: Property damage claims generally involve claims by third parties for alleged damage to real or personal
property as a result of our operations. Such claims may occasionally include those made against us by owners of property
located near our communities.
Our self-insurance liability at each reporting date represents the estimated costs of reported claims, claims incurred but not
yet reported, and claim adjustment expenses. The amount of our self-insurance liability is based on an analysis performed by a
third-party actuary that uses our historical claim and expense data, as well as industry data to estimate these overall costs. Key
assumptions used in developing these estimates include claim frequencies, severities and resolution patterns, which can occur over
an extended period of time. These estimates are subject to variability due to the length of time between the delivery of a home to
a homebuyer and when a construction defect claim is made, and the ultimate resolution of such claim; uncertainties regarding such
claims relative to our markets and the types of product we build; and legal or regulatory actions and/or interpretations, among
other factors. Due to the degree of judgment involved and the potential for variability in these underlying assumptions, our actual
future costs could differ from those estimated. In addition, changes in the frequency and severity of reported claims and the
estimates to resolve claims can impact the trends and assumptions used in the actuarial analysis, which could be material to our
consolidated financial statements. Though state regulations vary, construction defect claims are reported and resolved over a long
period of time, which can extend for 10 years or more. As a result, the majority of the estimated self-insurance liability based on
the actuarial analysis relates to claims incurred but not yet reported. Therefore, adjustments related to individual existing claims
generally do not significantly impact the overall estimated liability. Adjustments to our liabilities related to homes delivered in
prior years are recorded in the period in which a change in our estimate occurs.
Our self-insurance liability is presented on a gross basis for all years without consideration of insurance recoveries and amounts
we have paid on behalf of and expect to recover from other parties, if any. To facilitate this, as of November 30, 2016, we changed
the presentation of estimated probable insurance and other recoveries to reflect such amounts as receivables in our consolidated
balance sheets, with no impact on our consolidated statements of operations. Previously, these amounts were presented on a net
basis within our self-insurance liability. The estimated probable insurance and other recoveries that were reclassified to receivables
totaled $95.3 million at November 30, 2015 and $124.9 million at November 30, 2014. We also reported estimated probable
insurance and other recoveries of $84.5 million as receivables at November 30, 2016. The estimated probable recoveries for all
periods presented are principally based on actuarially determined amounts and depend on various factors, including, among other
things, the above-described claim cost estimates, our insurance policy coverage limits for the applicable policy year(s), historical
third-party recovery rates, insurance industry practices, the regulatory environment, and legal precedent, and are subject to a high
degree of variability from year to year. Because of the inherent uncertainty and variability in these assumptions, our actual insurance
recoveries could differ significantly from amounts currently estimated.
The changes in our self-insurance liability were as follows (in thousands):
Balance at beginning of year
Self-insurance expense (a)
Payments
Reclassification of estimated probable recoveries (b)
Years Ended November 30,
2016
2015
2014
$
173,011
$
205,228
$
239,067
24,808
(28,395)
(10,840)
18,590
(21,201)
(29,606)
13,491
(21,045)
(26,285)
Balance at end of year
$
158,584
$
173,011
$
205,228
(a) These expenses are included in selling, general and administrative expenses and are largely offset by contributions from
independent subcontractors participating in the wrap-up policy.
(b) Amount for each period represents the year-over-year change in the estimated probable insurance and other recoveries that
were reclassified to receivables to present our self-insurance liability on a gross basis.
For most of our claims, there is no interaction between our warranty liability and self-insurance liability. Typically, if a matter
is identified at its outset as either a warranty or self-insurance claim, it remains as such through its resolution. However, there can
be instances of interaction between the liabilities, such as where individual homeowners in a community separately request warranty
repairs to their homes to address a similar condition or issue and subsequently join together to initiate, or potentially initiate, a
legal process with respect to that condition or issue and/or the repair work we have undertaken. In these instances, the claims and
related repair work generally are initially covered by our warranty liability, and the costs associated with resolving the legal matter
(including any additional repair work) are covered by our self-insurance liability.
The payments we make in connection with claims and related repair work, whether covered within our warranty liability and/
or our self-insurance liability, may be recovered from our insurers to the extent such payments exceed the self-insured retentions
75
or deductibles under our general liability insurance policies. There generally is a timing difference between when we make
payments for claims and related repair work and our recovery of costs from applicable insurance carriers due to the insurance
carriers’ lengthy claim evaluation process. Also, in certain instances, in the course of resolving a claim, we pay amounts in advance
of and/or on behalf of a subcontractor(s) or their insurer(s) and believe we will be reimbursed for such payments. Estimates of
all such amounts, if any, are recorded as receivables in our consolidated balance sheets when any such recovery is considered
probable. Such receivables associated with our warranty and self-insurance matters totaled $14.6 million at November 30, 2016
and $23.8 million at November 30, 2015. We believe the collection of these receivables is probable based on our history of
collections for similar claims.
Performance Bonds and Letters of Credit. We are often required to provide to various municipalities and other government
agencies performance bonds and/or letters of credit to secure the completion of our projects and/or in support of obligations to
build community improvements such as roads, sewers, water systems and other utilities, and to support similar development
activities by certain of our unconsolidated joint ventures. At November 30, 2016, we had $535.7 million of performance bonds
and $31.0 million of letters of credit outstanding. At November 30, 2015, we had $565.4 million of performance bonds and $33.4
million of letters of credit outstanding. If any such performance bonds or letters of credit are called, we would be obligated to
reimburse the issuer of the performance bond or letter of credit. We do not believe that a material amount of any currently
outstanding performance bonds or letters of credit will be called. Performance bonds do not have stated expiration dates. Rather,
we are released from the performance bonds as the underlying performance is completed. The expiration dates of some letters of
credit issued in connection with community improvements coincide with the expected completion dates of the related projects or
obligations. Most letters of credit, however, are issued with an initial term of one year and are typically extended on a year-to-
year basis until the related performance obligations are completed.
Land Option Contracts and Other Similar Contracts. In the ordinary course of business, we enter into land option contracts
and other similar contracts to acquire rights to land for the construction of homes. At November 30, 2016, we had total cash
deposits of $42.8 million to purchase land having an aggregate purchase price of $1.07 billion. Our land option contracts and
other similar contracts generally do not contain provisions requiring our specific performance.
Leases. We lease certain property and equipment under noncancelable operating leases. Office and equipment leases are
typically for terms of three to five years and generally provide renewal options for terms up to an additional five years. In most
cases, we expect that leases that expire will be renewed or replaced by other leases with similar terms. The future minimum rental
payments under operating leases, which primarily consist of office leases having initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms
in excess of one year, are as follows (in thousands):
Years Ending November 30,
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
Thereafter
$
7,660
7,218
6,653
4,354
2,592
7,644
Total minimum lease payments
$
36,121
Rental expense on our noncancelable operating leases was $7.5 million in 2016, $8.5 million in 2015 and $7.7 million in
2014.
Note 16. Legal Matters
Nevada Development Contract Litigation. KB HOME Nevada Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of ours (“KB Nevada”), is a
defendant in a case in the Eighth Judicial District Court in Clark County, Nevada entitled Las Vegas Development Associates, LLC,
Essex Real Estate Partners, LLC, et al. v. KB HOME Nevada Inc. In 2007, Las Vegas Development Associates, LLC (“LVDA”)
agreed to purchase from KB Nevada approximately 83 acres of land located near Las Vegas, Nevada. LVDA subsequently assigned
its rights to Essex Real Estate Partners, LLC (“Essex”). KB Nevada and Essex entered into a development agreement relating to
certain major infrastructure improvements. LVDA’s and Essex’s complaint, initially filed in 2008, alleged that KB Nevada breached
the development agreement, and also alleged that KB Nevada fraudulently induced them to enter into the purchase and development
agreements. LVDA’s and Essex’s lenders subsequently filed related actions that were consolidated into the LVDA/Essex matter.
The consolidated plaintiffs sought rescission of the agreements or, in the alternative, compensatory damages of $55 million plus
76
unspecified punitive damages and other damages, and interest charges in excess of $41 million (“Claimed Damages”). KB Nevada
has denied the allegations, and believes it has meritorious defenses to the consolidated plaintiffs’ claims. On March 15, 2013, the
district court entered orders denying the consolidated plaintiffs’ motions for summary judgment and granting the majority of KB
Nevada’s motions for summary judgment, eliminating, among other of the consolidated plaintiffs’ claims, those for fraud, negligent
misrepresentation, and punitive damages. With the district court’s decisions, the only remaining claims against KB Nevada are
for contract damages and rescission. In August 2013, the court granted motions that further narrowed the scope of the Claimed
Damages. The lender plaintiffs filed an appeal from the district court’s summary judgment decisions with the Nevada Supreme
Court and that court heard oral argument on June 6, 2016. On September 22, 2016, the Nevada Supreme Court rejected the lender
plaintiffs’ appeal and upheld the district court’s summary judgment decisions against the lender plaintiffs in favor of KB Nevada.
The district court scheduled a new trial date of February 28, 2017 for all remaining claims. While the ultimate outcome is uncertain
— we believe it is reasonably possible that the loss in this matter could exceed the amount accrued by a range of zero to approximately
$55 million plus prejudgment interest, which could be material to our consolidated financial statements — KB Nevada believes
it will be successful in defending against the consolidated plaintiffs’ remaining claims and that the consolidated plaintiffs will not
be awarded rescission or damages.
Wage and Hour Litigation. In May 2011, a group of current and former sales representatives filed a collective action lawsuit
in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas, Galveston Division entitled Edwards, K. v. KB Home. The
lawsuit alleged that we misclassified sales representatives and failed to pay minimum and overtime wages in violation of the Fair
Labor Standards Act (29 U.S.C. §§ 206-07). In September 2012, the Edwards court conditionally certified a nationwide class,
and in May 2015, scheduled an initial trial involving a portion of the plaintiffs for December 2015. In September 2013, some of
the plaintiffs in the Edwards case filed a lawsuit in Los Angeles Superior Court entitled Andrea L. Bejenaru, et al. v. KB Home,
et al. The lawsuit alleged violations of California laws relating to overtime, meal period and rest break pay, itemized wage
statements, waiting time penalties and unfair business practices for a class of sales representatives. Although the case involved a
putative class of individuals who were our sales representatives from September 2009 forward, the Bejenaru case was not certified
as a class action. In the second quarter of 2015, plaintiff representatives in the Edwards and the Bejenaru cases claimed $66 million
in compensatory damages, penalties and interest, as well as injunctive relief, attorneys’ fees and costs for both matters. On
November 18, 2015, we reached a tentative mediated settlement with the plaintiff representatives in both cases that remains subject
to judicial approval. Under the terms of the tentative settlement, we agreed to pay $7.5 million to a settlement administrator for
distribution to individual settling plaintiffs, subject to obtaining releases from, and a specified threshold of participation by, such
individuals. On May 2, 2016, after further negotiations to resolve important details related to the claims submission process for
individual settling plaintiffs, we reached final settlement terms with the plaintiff representatives. The final settlement terms did
not change the settlement amount, which is intended to be inclusive of all payments to settling plaintiffs and all related fees and
costs, or the required threshold participation level. On May 19, 2016, the Edwards court approved the final settlement terms with
respect to the Edwards case and, with the Bejenaru court’s consent, preliminarily approved the final settlement terms with respect
to the Bejenaru case. On September 15, 2016, the court approved the final settlement terms with respect to the Bejenaru case. In
2015, we established an accrual for these cases in the amount of $7.5 million, which we paid as of November 30, 2016.
San Diego Water Board Notice of Violation. In August 2015, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego
Region (“RWQCB”) issued to us and another homebuilder a Notice of Violation (“NOV”) alleging violations of the California
Water Code and waste discharge prohibitions of the water quality control plan for the San Diego Region (Basin Plan). According
to the NOV, the alleged violations involved the unpermitted discharge of fill material into the waters of the United States/California
during the grading of a required secondary access road for a community located in San Diego County, California, which was
performed pursuant to a County-issued grading permit. In its NOV, the RWQCB requested to meet with us to discuss the alleged
violations as part of its process to determine whether to bring any enforcement action, and we have met with the RWQCB in an
effort to resolve the matters alleged in the NOV. An administrative hearing before the RWQCB originally scheduled for August
10, 2016 has been continued and a new hearing date has not yet been set. While the ultimate outcome is uncertain, we believe
that any penalties and related corrective measures the RWQCB may impose under the NOV could exceed $100,000 (the threshold
for the required disclosure of this type of environmental proceeding) but they are not expected to be material to our consolidated
financial statements.
Other Matters. In addition to the specific proceedings described above, we are involved in other litigation and regulatory
proceedings incidental to our business that are in various procedural stages. We believe that the accruals we have recorded for
probable and reasonably estimable losses with respect to these proceedings are adequate and that, as of November 30, 2016, it
was not reasonably possible that an additional material loss had been incurred in an amount in excess of the estimated amounts
already recognized or disclosed in our consolidated financial statements. We evaluate our accruals for litigation and regulatory
proceedings at least quarterly and, as appropriate, adjust them to reflect (a) the facts and circumstances known to us at the time,
including information regarding negotiations, settlements, rulings and other relevant events and developments; (b) the advice and
analyses of counsel; and (c) the assumptions and judgment of management. Similar factors and considerations are used in
establishing new accruals for proceedings as to which losses have become probable and reasonably estimable at the time an
77
evaluation is made. Based on our experience, we believe that the amounts that may be claimed or alleged against us in these
proceedings are not a meaningful indicator of our potential liability. The outcome of any of these proceedings, including the
defense and other litigation-related costs and expenses we may incur, however, is inherently uncertain and could differ significantly
from the estimate reflected in a related accrual, if made. Therefore, it is possible that the ultimate outcome of any proceeding, if
in excess of a related accrual or if an accrual had not been made, could be material to our consolidated financial statements.
Note 17. Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred Stock. To help protect the benefits of our NOLs, built-in losses and tax credits from the impact of an ownership
change under Section 382, on January 22, 2009, we adopted a Rights Agreement dated as of that date (“2009 Rights Agreement”),
and we declared a dividend distribution of one preferred share purchase right for each outstanding share of common stock that
was payable to stockholders of record as of the close of business on March 5, 2009. Subject to the terms, provisions and conditions
of the 2009 Rights Agreement, if these rights become exercisable, each right would initially represent the right to purchase from
us 1/100th of a share of our Series A Participating Cumulative Preferred Stock for a purchase price of $85.00 (“Purchase Price”).
If issued, each fractional share of preferred stock would generally give a stockholder approximately the same dividend, voting
and liquidation rights as does one share of our common stock. However, prior to exercise, a right does not give its holder any
rights as a stockholder, including without limitation any dividend, voting or liquidation rights. The rights will not be exercisable
until the earlier of (a) 10 calendar days after a public announcement by us that a person or group has become an Acquiring Person
(as defined under the 2009 Rights Agreement) and (b) 10 business days after the commencement of a tender or exchange offer by
a person or group if upon consummation of the offer the person or group would beneficially own 4.9% or more of our outstanding
common stock.
Until these rights become exercisable (“Distribution Date”), common stock certificates and/or book-entry shares will evidence
the rights and may contain a notation to that effect. Any transfer of shares of our common stock prior to the Distribution Date
will constitute a transfer of the associated rights. After the Distribution Date, the rights may be transferred other than in connection
with the transfer of the underlying shares of our common stock. If there is an Acquiring Person on the Distribution Date or a
person or group becomes an Acquiring Person after the Distribution Date, each holder of a right, other than rights that are or were
beneficially owned by an Acquiring Person, which will be void, will thereafter have the right to receive upon exercise of a right
and payment of the Purchase Price, that number of shares of our common stock having a market value of two times the Purchase
Price. After the later of the Distribution Date and the time we publicly announce that an Acquiring Person has become such, our
board of directors may exchange the rights, other than rights that are or were beneficially owned by an Acquiring Person, which
will be void, in whole or in part, at an exchange ratio of one share of common stock per right, subject to adjustment.
At any time prior to the later of the Distribution Date and the time we publicly announce that an Acquiring Person becomes
such, our board of directors may redeem all of the then-outstanding rights in whole, but not in part, at a price of $.001 per right,
subject to adjustment (“Redemption Price”). The redemption will be effective immediately upon the board of directors’ action,
unless the action provides that such redemption will be effective at a subsequent time or upon the occurrence or nonoccurrence
of one or more specified events, in which case the redemption will be effective in accordance with the provisions of the action.
Immediately upon the effectiveness of the redemption of the rights, the right to exercise the rights will terminate and the only right
of the holders of rights will be to receive the Redemption Price, with interest thereon. The rights issued pursuant to the 2009
Rights Agreement will expire on the earliest of (a) the close of business on March 5, 2019, (b) the time at which the rights are
redeemed, (c) the time at which the rights are exchanged, (d) the time at which our board of directors determines that a related
provision in our Restated Certificate of Incorporation is no longer necessary, and (e) the close of business on the first day of a
taxable year of ours to which our board of directors determines that no tax benefits may be carried forward. At our annual meeting
of stockholders on April 2, 2009, our stockholders approved the 2009 Rights Agreement.
Common Stock. In 2014, we issued 7,986,111 shares of our common stock, par value $1.00 per share, in underwritten public
offerings at a price of $18.00 per share. We used shares of treasury stock for the issuance and received net proceeds of $137.0
million after underwriting discounts, commissions and transaction expenses.
Each share of our common stock issued in the 2014 offering includes a preferred share purchase right associated with and
subject to the terms of the 2009 Rights Agreement. Any shares of our common stock delivered upon conversion to holders of the
1.375% Convertible Senior Notes due 2019 will also include such preferred share purchase rights.
In 2014, our board of directors amended the Director Plan to provide directors with a one-time opportunity to irrevocably
elect to receive an equivalent value of shares of our common stock in lieu of the cash payments that are otherwise due upon the
respective settlement of their Director Plan SARs under the terms of the plan. Concurrent with the amendment of the Director
Plan, for the purpose of effecting any such settlements, our board of directors authorized the repurchase of not more than 680,000
shares of our common stock, and also authorized potential future grants of up to 680,000 stock payment awards under the KB
Home 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (“2014 Plan”), in each case solely as necessary for director elections in respect of outstanding
78
Director Plan SARs. The 2014 Plan, which was amended in April 2016, is discussed in Note 19 – Employee Benefit and Stock
Plans. During 2014, following the amendment of the Director Plan, directors made irrevocable elections to receive an aggregate
of 679,815 shares of our common stock upon the respective settlement of their outstanding Director Plan SARs. As of November
30, 2016, no Director Plan SARs had been settled. In addition, we had not repurchased any shares and no stock payment awards
had been granted under the 2014 Plan, as amended, pursuant to the respective board of directors authorizations or otherwise.
The above-described director elections made in 2014 changed only the method of settlement of the outstanding Director Plan
SARs, and did not change any of the other terms of these awards or impact the value to the directors. As a result of the directors’
elections, the relevant outstanding Director Plan SARs were effectively converted to stock-settled awards, which are accounted
for as equity awards, instead of cash-settled liability awards, thereby reducing the degree of variability in the expense associated
with such awards in future quarters.
On January 12, 2016, our board of directors authorized us to repurchase a total of up to 10,000,000 shares of our outstanding
common stock. This authorization reaffirmed and incorporated the then-current balance of 4,000,000 shares that remained under
a prior board-approved share repurchase program. The amount and timing of shares purchased under this 10,000,000 share
repurchase program are subject to market and business conditions and other factors, and purchases may be made from time to
time and at any time through open market or privately negotiated transactions. This share repurchase authorization will continue
in effect until fully used or earlier terminated or suspended by the board of directors. As of November 30, 2016, we had repurchased
8,373,000 shares of our common stock pursuant to this authorization, at a total cost of $85.9 million. All of these share repurchases
were made in the 2016 first quarter. We did not repurchase any of our common stock under this program in 2015 or 2014.
Our board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends of $.0250 per share of common stock in 2016, 2015 and 2014.
All dividends declared during 2016, 2015 and 2014 were also paid during those years.
Treasury Stock. In addition to the shares purchased in 2016 pursuant to our share repurchase program, we acquired $2.5
million, $.6 million and $.5 million of our common stock in 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. All of the common stock acquired
in 2015 and 2014 and a portion of the common stock acquired in 2016 consisted of previously issued shares delivered to us by
employees to satisfy their withholding tax obligations on the vesting of restricted stock awards or of forfeitures of previous restricted
stock awards. Treasury stock is recorded at cost. Differences between the cost of treasury stock and the reissuance proceeds are
recorded to paid-in capital. These transactions are not considered repurchases under the 10,000,000 share repurchase program
described above.
Note 18. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The following table presents the changes in the balances of each component of accumulated other comprehensive loss (in
thousands):
Postretirement Benefit Plan Adjustments
Balance at November 30, 2014
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss
Income tax expense related to items of other comprehensive income
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
Balance at November 30, 2015
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss
Income tax expense related to items of other comprehensive income
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
Balance at November 30, 2016
79
Total
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
$
(21,008)
3,745
2,404
(2,460)
3,689
(17,319)
468
1,635
(841)
1,262
$
(16,057)
The amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss consisted of the following (in thousands):
Details About Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Components
2016
2015
2014
Years Ended November 30,
Postretirement benefit plan adjustments
Amortization of net actuarial loss
Amortization of prior service cost
Total reclassifications (a)
$
$
79
$
848
$
1,556
1,556
1,635
$
2,404
$
357
1,556
1,913
(a) The accumulated other comprehensive loss components are included in the computation of net periodic benefit costs as further
discussed in Note 20 – Postretirement Benefits.
The estimated net actuarial loss and prior service cost expected to be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive loss
into net periodic benefit cost during 2017 are $.1 million and $1.6 million, respectively.
Note 19. Employee Benefit and Stock Plans
Most of our employees are eligible to participate in the KB Home 401(k) Savings Plan (“401(k) Plan”) under which we
partially match employee contributions. The aggregate cost of the 401(k) Plan to us was $5.3 million in 2016, $4.6 million in
2015 and $3.8 million in 2014. The assets of the 401(k) Plan are held by a third-party trustee. The 401(k) Plan participants may
direct the investment of their funds among one or more of the several fund options offered by the 401(k) Plan. As of November 30,
2016, 2015 and 2014, approximately 5%, 5% and 6%, respectively, of the 401(k) Plan’s net assets were invested in our common
stock.
Approval of Amended KB Home 2014 Plan. At our Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on April 7, 2016, our stockholders
approved the Amended KB Home 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (“Amended 2014 Plan”), authorizing, among other things, the
issuance for grants of stock-based awards to our employees, non-employee directors and consultants of up to 7,500,000 additional
shares above the original 4,800,000 shares our stockholders approved under the plan (or an aggregate issuance of 12,300,000
shares), plus any shares that were available for grant as of April 7, 2014 under our 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (“2010 Plan”), and
any shares subject to then-outstanding awards under the 2010 Plan that subsequently expire or are canceled, forfeited, tendered
or withheld to satisfy tax withholding obligations with respect to full value awards, or settled for cash. No new awards may be
made under the 2010 Plan. Therefore, the Amended 2014 Plan is our only active equity compensation plan. Under the Amended
2014 Plan, grants of stock options and other similar awards reduce the Amended 2014 Plan’s share capacity on a 1-for-1 basis,
and grants of restricted stock and other similar “full value” awards reduce the Amended 2014 Plan’s share capacity on a 1.78-
for-1 basis. In addition, subject to the Amended 2014 Plan’s terms and conditions, a stock-based award may also be granted under
the Amended 2014 Plan to replace an outstanding award granted under another plan of ours (subject to the terms of such other
plan) with terms substantially identical to those of the award being replaced.
The Amended 2014 Plan provides that stock options and SARs may be awarded for periods of up to 10 years. The Amended
2014 Plan also enables us to grant cash bonuses and other stock-based awards. As of November 30, 2016, 2015, and 2014, in
addition to awards outstanding under the Amended 2014 Plan, we had awards outstanding under the 2010 Plan and our Amended
and Restated 1999 Incentive Plan, both of which provided for generally the same types of awards as the Amended 2014 Plan. We
also had awards outstanding under our Performance-Based Incentive Plan for Senior Management, which provided for generally
the same types of awards as the Amended 2014 Plan, but stock option awards granted under this plan had terms of up to 15 years
years.
Stock-Based Compensation. With the approval of the management development and compensation committee, consisting
entirely of independent members of our board of directors, we have provided compensation benefits to certain of our employees
in the form of stock options, restricted stock, PSUs and SARs. Certain stock-based compensation benefits are also provided to
our non-employee directors pursuant to the Director Plan. Compensation expense related to equity-based awards is included in
selling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of operations.
80
The following table presents our stock-based compensation expense (in thousands):
Stock options (a)
Restricted stock
PSUs
Director awards
Total
Years Ended November 30,
2016
2015
2014
$
$
7,076
$
7,576
$
2,630
5,343
1,801
2,499
5,404
1,664
16,850
$
17,143
$
3,024
1,750
3,699
(91)
8,382
(a) Compensation expense associated with stock options was accelerated in 2015 as a result of retirement provisions being met
for certain stock option recipients.
Stock Options. Stock option transactions are summarized as follows:
2016
2015
2014
Years Ended November 30,
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Options
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Options
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
19.39
16.21
13.95
34.07
11,735,042
$
1,262,000
(76,164)
(285,234)
20.45
14.92
9.69
45.80
10,531,938
$
1,273,647
(36,665)
(33,878)
18.95
12,635,644
19.70
10,389,722
$
$
19.39
11,735,042
20.35
10,103,739
$
$
21.11
14.62
7.92
20.25
20.45
21.32
Options
12,635,644
$
1,012,686
(551,898)
(364,887)
12,731,545
10,506,810
$
$
7,034,523
1,554,195
3,514,077
Options outstanding at
beginning of year
Granted
Exercised
Cancelled
Options outstanding at end of
year
Options exercisable at end of
year
Options available for grant at
end of year
The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $1.4 million for the year ended November 30, 2016, $.4 million for
the year ended November 30, 2015 and $.3 million for the year ended November 30, 2014. The aggregate intrinsic value of stock
options outstanding was $24.5 million, $16.4 million and $35.8 million at November 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The
intrinsic value of stock options exercisable was $23.3 million at November 30, 2016, $16.4 million at November 30, 2015, and
$31.7 million at November 30, 2014. The intrinsic value of a stock option is the amount by which the market value of the underlying
stock exceeds the price of the option.
Stock options outstanding and stock options exercisable at November 30, 2016 are summarized as follows:
Options Outstanding
Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Price
Options
$ 6.32 to $11.06
$11.07 to $14.95
$14.96 to $16.69
$16.70 to $28.10
$28.11 to $69.63
2,771,667
$
2,595,011
2,668,775
2,609,550
2,086,542
$ 6.32 to $69.63
12,731,545
$
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
8.33
14.60
15.94
23.24
36.97
18.95
4.3
8.1
6.2
1.2
1.9
4.4
81
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life
8.33
14.41
15.78
23.24
36.97
19.70
3.5
Options
2,771,667
$
1,370,933
1,668,118
2,609,550
2,086,542
10,506,810
$
The weighted average grant date fair value of stock options granted in 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $5.82, $5.49 and $5.07,
respectively. The fair value of each stock option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model with the following assumptions:
Risk-free interest rate
Expected volatility factor
Expected dividend yield
Expected term
Years Ended November 30,
2016
2015
2014
1.3%
41.3%
.6%
1.4%
43.6%
.7%
1.6%
41.0%
.7%
5 years
5 years
5 years
The risk-free interest rate assumption is determined based on observed interest rates appropriate for the stock options’ expected
term. The expected volatility factor is based on a combination of the historical volatility of our common stock and the implied
volatility of publicly traded options on our stock. The expected dividend yield assumption is based on our history of dividend
payouts. The expected term of employee stock options is estimated using historical data.
As of November 30, 2016, there was $4.4 million of total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to unvested
stock option awards. This expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.7 years.
We record proceeds from the exercise of stock options as additions to common stock and paid-in capital. The tax shortfalls
of $2.2 million in 2016, $1.7 million in 2015 and $1.2 million in 2014 resulting from the cancellation of stock awards were reflected
in paid-in capital. In both 2016 and 2015, the consolidated statement of cash flows reflected $.2 million of excess tax benefits
associated with the exercise of stock options. In 2014, the consolidated statement of cash flows reflected no excess tax benefit
associated with the exercise of stock options.
Restricted Stock. From time to time, we grant restricted stock to various employees as a compensation benefit. During the
restriction periods, these employees are entitled to vote and to receive cash dividends on such shares. The restrictions imposed
with respect to the shares granted lapse in installments within, or in full at the end of, three years after their grant date if certain
conditions are met.
Restricted stock transactions are summarized as follows:
2016
Years Ended November 30,
2015
Weighted
Average
per Share
Grant Date
Fair Value
15.88
15.73
14.78
15.12
16.24
Shares
$
416,977
453,703
(252,854)
(13,207)
604,619
$
Weighted
Average
per Share
Grant Date
Fair Value
15.81
15.19
14.83
15.45
15.88
Shares
$
355,294
285,006
(204,663)
(18,660)
416,977
$
2014
Weighted
Average
per Share
Grant Date
Fair Value
Shares
$
219,628
219,835
(73,908)
(10,261)
355,294
$
16.23
15.34
16.52
18.55
15.81
Outstanding at
beginning of year
Granted
Vested
Cancelled
Outstanding at end
of year
As of November 30, 2016, we had $7.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock awards
that will be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately three years.
Performance-Based Restricted Stock Units. On October 6, 2016, we granted PSUs to certain employees. Each PSU grant
corresponds to a target amount of our common stock (“Award Shares”). Each PSU entitles the recipient to receive a grant of
between 0% and 200% of the recipient’s Award Shares, and will vest based on our achieving, over a three-year period commencing
on December 1, 2016 and ending on November 30, 2019, specified levels of (a) adjusted cumulative earnings per share (b) average
adjusted return on invested capital and (c) revenue growth performance relative to a peer group of high-production public
homebuilding companies. The grant date fair value of each such PSU was $16.21. On October 8, 2015, we granted PSUs to
certain employees with similar terms as the 2016 PSU grants, except that the applicable performance period commenced on
December 1, 2015 and ends on November 30, 2018. The grant date fair value of each such PSU was $14.92. On October 9, 2014,
82
we granted PSUs to certain employees with similar terms as the 2016 PSU grants, except that the applicable performance period
commenced on December 1, 2014 and ends on November 30, 2017. The grant date fair value of each such 2014 PSU was $14.62.
PSU transactions are summarized as follows:
2016
2015
2014
Years Ended November 30,
Weighted
Average
per Share
Grant Date
Fair Value
15.52
13.81
10.21
16.21
Shares
820,209
$
369,281
(374,630)
(5,000)
Weighted
Average
per Share
Grant Date
Fair Value
15.70
14.92
—
—
Shares
628,209
$
192,000
—
—
Weighted
Average
per Share
Grant Date
Fair Value
16.39
14.62
—
—
Shares
385,049
$
243,160
—
—
809,860
$
17.19
820,209
$
15.52
628,209
$
15.70
Outstanding at
beginning of year
Granted
Vested
Cancelled
Outstanding at end
of year
The number of shares of our common stock actually granted to a recipient, if any, when a PSU vests will depend on the degree
of achievement of the applicable performance measures during the applicable three-year period. The shares of our common stock
that were granted under the terms of PSUs that vested in 2016 included an aggregate of 147,581 additional shares above the target
amount awarded to the eligible recipients based on our achieving certain levels of average return on equity performance and
revenue growth performance relative to a peer group of high-production homebuilding companies from December 1, 2012 through
November 30, 2015. The PSUs do not have dividend or voting rights during the performance period. Compensation cost for
PSUs is initially estimated based on target performance achievement and adjusted as appropriate throughout the performance
period. Accordingly, future compensation costs associated with outstanding PSUs may increase or decrease based on the probability
and extent of achievement with respect to the applicable performance measures. At November 30, 2016, we had $11.3 million of
total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested PSUs, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average
period of approximately three years.
Stock Appreciation Rights. In 2008, we granted SARs to various employees. These cash-settled awards have been accounted
for as liabilities in our consolidated financial statements. Each SAR represents a right to receive a cash payment equal to the
positive difference, if any, between the grant price and the market value of a share of our common stock on the date of exercise.
The SARs vested in equal annual installments over three years. At November 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, we had 29,939 SARs
outstanding, which are fully vested and will expire in July 2017.
Director Awards. We have granted Director Plan SARs and deferred common stock awards to our non-employee directors
pursuant to the terms of the Director Plan and elections made by each director. All of these awards were fully vested as of November
30, 2016. Director Plan SARs, which have not been granted since April 2014 as they ceased being a component of non-employee
director compensation after that date, are stock settled, have terms of up to 15 years and may be exercised when a respective
director leaves the board or earlier if applicable stock ownership requirements have been met. Deferred common stock awards
will be paid out at the earlier of a change in control or the date a respective director leaves the board. All Director Plan SARs
were granted at an exercise price equal to the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant. At November 30, 2016,
2015 and 2014, our non-employee directors had, in aggregate, 452,983 of outstanding Director Plan SARs, and 485,632, 419,962
and 358,404, respectively, of outstanding deferred common stock awards. In addition, beginning in 2015, we have granted common
stock on an unrestricted basis to our non-employee directors on the grant date pursuant to the Director Plan and elections made
by each director.
Grantor Stock Ownership Trust. We have a grantor stock ownership trust (“Trust”), administered by a third-party trustee,
that holds and distributes the shares of common stock acquired to support certain employee compensation and employee benefit
obligations under our existing stock option plan, the 401(k) Plan and other employee benefit plans. The existence of the Trust
does not impact the amount of benefits or compensation that is paid under these plans.
For financial reporting purposes, the Trust is consolidated with us, and therefore any dividend transactions between us and
the Trust are eliminated. Acquired shares held by the Trust remain valued at the market price on the date of purchase and are
shown as a reduction to stockholders’ equity in the consolidated balance sheets. The difference between the Trust share value and
the market value on the date shares are released from the Trust is included in paid-in capital. Common stock held in the Trust is
83
not considered outstanding in the computations of earnings per share. The Trust held 9,431,756 and 10,135,461 shares of common
stock at November 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The trustee votes shares held by the Trust in accordance with voting directions
from eligible employees, as specified in a trust agreement with the trustee.
Note 20. Postretirement Benefits
We have a supplemental non-qualified, unfunded retirement plan, the KB Home Retirement Plan (“Retirement Plan”), effective
as of July 11, 2002, pursuant to which we have offered to pay supplemental pension benefits to certain designated individuals
(consisting of current and former employees) in connection with their retirement. The Retirement Plan was closed to new
participants in 2004. We also have an unfunded death benefit plan, the KB Home Death Benefit Only Plan (“DBO Plan”),
implemented on November 1, 2001, for certain designated individuals (consisting of current and former employees). The DBO
Plan was closed to new participants in 2006.
In connection with these plans, we have purchased cost recovery life insurance contracts on the lives of the designated
individuals. The insurance contracts associated with the plans are held by a trust. The trust is the owner and beneficiary of such
insurance contracts. The amount of the insurance coverage under the contracts is designed to provide sufficient funds to cover
all costs of the plans if assumptions made as to employment term, mortality experience, policy earnings and other factors, as
applicable, are realized. The cash surrender value of the Retirement Plan life insurance contracts was $44.4 million at November 30,
2016 and $45.5 million at November 30, 2015. We recognized investment gains on the cash surrender value of the Retirement
Plan life insurance contracts of $.4 million in 2016 and $1.8 million in 2014, and an investment loss of $1.3 million in 2015. In
2016, 2015, and 2014, we paid $1.4 million, $1.4 million and $1.2 million, respectively, in benefits under the Retirement Plan to
eligible former employees. The cash surrender value of the DBO Plan life insurance contracts was $17.0 million at November 30,
2016 and $16.8 million at November 30, 2015. We recognized investment gains on the cash surrender value of the DBO Plan life
insurance contracts of $.2 million in 2016 and $.7 million in 2014, and an investment loss of $.3 million in 2015. We have not
paid out any benefits under the DBO Plan.
The net periodic benefit cost of our Retirement Plan and DBO Plan consisted of the following (in thousands):
Interest cost
Amortization of prior service cost
Service cost
Amortization of net actuarial loss
Total
Years Ended November 30,
2016
2015
2014
$
$
2,285
$
2,270
$
1,556
1,045
79
1,556
1,142
848
4,965
$
5,816
$
2,456
1,556
1,184
357
5,553
The liabilities related to these plans were $62.2 million at November 30, 2016 and $60.8 million at November 30, 2015, and
are included in accrued expenses and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. For each of the years ended November 30,
2016 and 2015, the discount rate we used for the plans was 3.6%.
Benefit payments under our Retirement Plan and DBO Plan are expected to be paid during each year ended November 30 as
follows: 2017 — $1.8 million; 2018 — $2.0 million; 2019 — $2.5 million; 2020 — $2.8 million; 2021 — $3.5 million; and for
the five years ended November 30, 2026 — $19.7 million in the aggregate.
84
Note 21. Supplemental Disclosure to Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
The following are supplemental disclosures to the consolidated statements of cash flows (in thousands):
Summary of cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year:
Homebuilding
Financial services
Total
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized
Income taxes paid
Income taxes refunded
Supplemental disclosure of noncash activities:
Reclassification of warranty recoveries to receivables
Increase (decrease) in consolidated inventories not owned
Increase in inventories due to distributions of land and land
development from an unconsolidated joint venture
Inventories and inventory-related obligations associated with TIFE
assessments tied to distribution of land from an unconsolidated joint
venture
Inventories acquired through seller financing
Conversion of liability awards to equity awards
Years Ended November 30,
2016
2015
2014
$
$
$
$
592,086
$
559,042
$
356,366
914
1,299
2,402
593,000
$
560,341
$
358,768
1,134
$
22,486
$
3,307
550
3,612
11
13,037
1,619
1,728
$
2,151
(59,413)
$
7,238
106,807
18,110
(5,755)
4,277
12,705
90,115
—
99,108
—
—
20,291
—
33,197
61,553
6,455
85
Note 22. Supplemental Guarantor Information
Our obligations to pay principal, premium, if any, and interest on the senior notes and borrowings, if any, under the Credit
Facility are guaranteed on a joint and several basis by certain of our subsidiaries (“Guarantor Subsidiaries”). The guarantees are
full and unconditional and the Guarantor Subsidiaries are 100% owned by us. Pursuant to the terms of the indenture governing
the senior notes and the terms of the Credit Facility, if any of the Guarantor Subsidiaries ceases to be a “significant subsidiary”
as defined by Rule 1-02 of Regulation S-X (as in effect on June 1, 1996) using a 5% rather than a 10% threshold (provided that
the assets of our non-guarantor subsidiaries do not in the aggregate exceed 10% of an adjusted measure of our consolidated total
assets), it will be automatically and unconditionally released and discharged from its guaranty of the senior notes and the Credit
Facility so long as all guarantees by such Guarantor Subsidiary of any other of our or our subsidiaries’ indebtedness are terminated
at or prior to the time of such release. We have determined that separate, full financial statements of the Guarantor Subsidiaries
would not be material to investors and, accordingly, supplemental financial information for the Guarantor Subsidiaries is presented.
The supplemental financial information for all periods presented below reflects those subsidiaries that were Guarantor
Subsidiaries as of November 30, 2016.
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations (in thousands)
Revenues
Homebuilding:
Revenues
Construction and land costs
Selling, general and administrative
expenses
Operating income (loss)
Interest income
Interest expense
Intercompany interest
Equity in loss of unconsolidated joint
ventures
Homebuilding pretax income (loss)
Financial services pretax income
Total pretax income (loss)
Income tax benefit (expense)
Equity in net income of subsidiaries
Year Ended November 30, 2016
KB Home
Corporate
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Consolidating
Adjustments
Total
$
$
— $
3,169,545
— $
—
3,169,545
(2,661,888)
$
$
425,101
413,398
(379,213)
$
$
(91,859)
(251,384)
(46,198)
(91,859)
470
(177,329)
301,432
256,273
55
(3,958)
(107,388)
(12,013)
4
(3,946)
(14,711)
—
(2,179)
(2)
32,714
—
32,714
17,200
55,701
142,803
—
142,803
(52,700)
—
(30,668)
4,466
(26,202)
(8,200)
—
— $
3,594,646
— $
—
—
—
—
179,333
(179,333)
—
—
—
—
—
(55,701)
3,582,943
(3,041,101)
(389,441)
152,401
529
(5,900)
—
(2,181)
144,849
4,466
149,315
(43,700)
—
Net income (loss)
$
105,615
$
90,103
$
(34,402) $
(55,701) $
105,615
86
Revenues
Homebuilding:
Revenues
Construction and land costs
Selling, general and administrative
expenses
Operating income (loss)
Interest income
Interest expense
Intercompany interest
Equity in loss of unconsolidated joint
ventures
Homebuilding pretax income (loss)
Financial services pretax income
Total pretax income (loss)
Income tax benefit (expense)
Equity in net income of subsidiaries
Year Ended November 30, 2015
KB Home
Corporate
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Consolidating
Adjustments
Total
$
$
— $
2,640,678
— $
—
2,640,678
(2,196,228)
$
$
391,352
380,309
(343,140)
$
$
(86,053)
(213,292)
(86,053)
451
(180,701)
289,727
231,158
6
(6,184)
(101,540)
(43,653)
(6,484)
1
—
(23,158)
—
(1,803)
(1)
23,424
—
23,424
2,000
59,219
121,637
—
121,637
(46,700)
—
(29,642)
11,624
(18,018)
2,300
—
— $
3,032,030
— $
—
—
—
—
165,029
(165,029)
—
—
—
—
—
(59,219)
3,020,987
(2,539,368)
(342,998)
138,621
458
(21,856)
—
(1,804)
115,419
11,624
127,043
(42,400)
—
Net income (loss)
$
84,643
$
74,937
$
(15,718) $
(59,219) $
84,643
Revenues
Homebuilding:
Revenues
Construction and land costs
Selling, general and administrative
expenses
Operating income (loss)
Interest income
Interest expense
Intercompany interest
Equity in income (loss) of
unconsolidated joint ventures
Homebuilding pretax income (loss)
Financial services pretax income
Total pretax income (loss)
Income tax benefit
Equity in net income of subsidiaries
Year Ended November 30, 2014
KB Home
Corporate
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Consolidating
Adjustments
Total
$
$
— $
2,017,170
— $
—
2,017,170
(1,658,925)
$
$
383,779
372,473
(326,726)
$
$
(68,717)
(176,795)
(42,511)
(68,717)
432
(165,485)
287,017
—
53,247
—
53,247
215,691
649,411
181,450
9
(6,056)
(118,901)
(2,549)
53,953
—
53,953
507,997
—
3,236
2
—
(27,325)
3,290
(20,797)
8,546
(12,251)
99,712
—
— $
2,400,949
— $
—
—
—
—
140,791
(140,791)
—
—
—
—
—
(649,411)
2,389,643
(1,985,651)
(288,023)
115,969
443
(30,750)
—
741
86,403
8,546
94,949
823,400
—
Net income
$
918,349
$
561,950
$
87,461
$
(649,411) $
918,349
87
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) (in thousands)
Year Ended November 30, 2016
KB Home
Corporate
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Consolidating
Adjustments
Total
Net income (loss)
$
105,615
$
90,103
$
(34,402) $
(55,701) $
105,615
Other comprehensive income:
Postretirement benefit plan adjustments
Other comprehensive income before tax
Income tax expense related to items of
other comprehensive income
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
2,103
2,103
(841)
1,262
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
2,103
2,103
(841)
1,262
Comprehensive income (loss)
$
106,877
$
90,103
$
(34,402) $
(55,701) $
106,877
Year Ended November 30, 2015
KB Home
Corporate
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Consolidating
Adjustments
Total
Net income (loss)
$
84,643
$
74,937
$
(15,718) $
(59,219) $
84,643
Other comprehensive income:
Postretirement benefit plan adjustments
Other comprehensive income before tax
Income tax expense related to items of
other comprehensive income
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
6,149
6,149
(2,460)
3,689
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
6,149
6,149
(2,460)
3,689
Comprehensive income (loss)
$
88,332
$
74,937
$
(15,718) $
(59,219) $
88,332
Year Ended November 30, 2014
KB Home
Corporate
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Consolidating
Adjustments
Total
Net income
$
918,349
$
561,950
$
87,461
$
(649,411) $
918,349
Other comprehensive loss:
Postretirement benefit plan adjustments
Other comprehensive loss before tax
Income tax expense related to items of
other comprehensive income
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
(1,888)
(1,888)
(1,604)
(3,492)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(1,888)
(1,888)
(1,604)
(3,492)
Comprehensive income
$
914,857
$
561,950
$
87,461
$
(649,411) $
914,857
88
Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets (in thousands)
KB Home
Corporate
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Consolidating
Adjustments
Total
November 30, 2016
Assets
Homebuilding:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
463,100
$
100,439
$
28,547
$
— $
592,086
Restricted cash
Receivables
Inventories
Investments in unconsolidated
joint ventures
Deferred tax assets, net
Other assets
Financial services
Intercompany receivables
Investments in subsidiaries
—
4,807
—
—
276,737
79,526
824,170
—
3,559,012
35,965
—
135,915
3,048,132
61,517
318,077
9,177
3,673,257
—
—
—
—
90,943
355,096
2,499
144,171
2,442
623,698
10,499
97,062
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(3,656,074)
(35,965)
—
231,665
3,403,228
64,016
738,985
91,145
5,121,125
10,499
—
—
Total assets
$
4,419,147
$
3,673,257
$
731,259
$ (3,692,039) $
5,131,624
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Homebuilding:
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and
other liabilities
Notes payable
Financial services
Intercompany payables
Stockholders’ equity
$
131,530
$
397,605
$
237,192
$
— $
766,327
2,548,112
66,927
2,679,642
464,532
—
—
16,360
3,208,725
1,723,145
—
25,110
262,302
2,003
430,989
35,965
—
—
—
(3,656,074)
(35,965)
2,640,149
3,406,476
2,003
—
1,723,145
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
4,419,147
$
3,673,257
$
731,259
$ (3,692,039) $
5,131,624
89
KB Home
Corporate
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Consolidating
Adjustments
Total
November 30, 2015
Assets
Homebuilding:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
444,850
$
96,741
$
17,451
$
— $
559,042
Restricted cash
Receivables
Inventories
Investments in unconsolidated
joint ventures
Deferred tax assets, net
Other assets
Financial services
Intercompany receivables
Investments in subsidiaries
9,344
39
—
—
190,770
73,808
—
145,022
2,900,202
69,057
465,105
11,198
718,811
3,687,325
—
3,627,150
39,383
—
—
—
—
102,937
413,545
2,501
126,321
3,986
666,741
14,028
102,103
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(3,729,253)
(39,383)
9,344
247,998
3,313,747
71,558
782,196
88,992
5,072,877
14,028
—
—
Total assets
$
4,385,344
$
3,687,325
$
782,872
$ (3,768,636) $
5,086,905
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity
Homebuilding:
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and
other liabilities
Notes payable
Financial services
Intercompany payables
Stockholders’ equity
$
136,352
$
417,315
$
238,833
$
— $
792,500
2,540,980
35,664
2,677,332
452,979
—
—
17,178
3,234,346
1,690,834
—
25,110
263,943
1,817
477,729
39,383
—
—
—
(3,729,253)
(39,383)
2,601,754
3,394,254
1,817
—
1,690,834
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
$
4,385,344
$
3,687,325
$
782,872
$ (3,768,636) $
5,086,905
90
Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows (in thousands)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities
Cash flows from investing activities:
Contributions to unconsolidated joint
ventures
Return of investments in unconsolidated
joint ventures
Purchases of property and equipment,
net
Intercompany
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities
Cash flows from financing activities:
Year Ended November 30, 2016
KB Home
Corporate
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Consolidating
Adjustments
Total
$
(40,277) $
188,372
$
40,560
$
— $
188,655
—
—
(4,052)
144,651
(4,852)
4,307
(555)
—
(750)
—
(177)
—
—
—
—
(144,651)
(5,602)
4,307
(4,784)
—
140,599
(1,100)
(927)
(144,651)
(6,079)
Change in restricted cash
9,344
—
Payments on mortgages and land
contracts due to land sellers and other
loans
Issuance of common stock under
employee stock plans
Excess tax benefits from stock-based
compensation
Payments of cash dividends
Stock repurchases
Intercompany
—
—
—
—
—
—
(67,845)
—
—
—
5,343
186
(8,586)
(88,359)
—
—
(115,729)
—
(28,922)
—
—
—
—
—
—
144,651
9,344
(67,845)
5,343
186
(8,586)
(88,359)
—
Net cash used in financing activities
(82,072)
(183,574)
(28,922)
144,651
(149,917)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
18,250
3,698
10,711
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of
year
444,850
96,741
18,750
—
—
32,659
560,341
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
$
463,100
$
100,439
$
29,461
$
— $
593,000
91
Year Ended November 30, 2015
KB Home
Corporate
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Consolidating
Adjustments
Total
Net cash provided by operating activities
$
44,422
$
110,688
$
26,075
$
— $
181,185
Cash flows from investing activities:
Contributions to unconsolidated joint
ventures
Return of investments in unconsolidated
joint ventures
Purchases of property and equipment,
net
Intercompany
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities
Cash flows from financing activities:
Change in restricted cash
Proceeds from issuance of debt
Payment of debt issuance costs
Repayment of senior notes
Payments on mortgages and land
contracts due to land sellers and other
loans
Issuance of common stock under
employee stock plans
Excess tax benefits from stock-based
compensation
Payments of cash dividends
Stock repurchases
Intercompany
Net cash provided by (used in) financing
activities
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of
year
—
—
(2,890)
45,470
(20,625)
14,000
(1,271)
—
42,580
(7,896)
—
—
—
—
(22,877)
—
—
—
17,891
250,000
(4,561)
(199,906)
—
740
157
(9,186)
(567)
—
(1)
—
(516)
—
(517)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(45,470)
(20,626)
14,000
(4,677)
—
(45,470)
(11,303)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
45,470
17,891
250,000
(4,561)
(199,906)
(22,877)
740
157
(9,186)
(567)
—
—
(19,586)
—
(25,884)
54,568
(42,463)
(25,884)
45,470
31,691
141,570
60,329
(326)
303,280
36,412
19,076
—
—
201,573
358,768
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
$
444,850
$
96,741
$
18,750
$
— $
560,341
92
Net cash provided by (used in) operating
activities
Cash flows from investing activities:
Contributions to unconsolidated joint
ventures
Proceeds from sale of investment in
unconsolidated joint venture
Purchases of property and equipment,
net
Intercompany
Net cash provided by (used in) investing
activities
Cash flows from financing activities:
Change in restricted cash
Proceeds from issuance of debt
Payment of debt issuance costs
Payments on mortgages and land
contracts due to land sellers and other
loans
Proceeds from issuance of common
stock, net
Issuance of common stock under
employee stock plans
Payments of cash dividends
Stock repurchases
Intercompany
Year Ended November 30, 2014
KB Home
Corporate
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
Consolidating
Adjustments
Total
$
82,629
$
(641,728) $
(71,592) $
— $
(630,691)
—
—
(48,846)
(251)
—
10,110
(208)
(794,624)
(4,145)
—
(1,442)
—
—
—
—
794,624
(49,097)
10,110
(5,795)
—
(794,832)
(52,991)
8,417
794,624
(44,782)
14,671
400,000
(5,448)
—
—
—
—
(36,918)
137,045
1,896
(8,982)
(546)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(794,624)
14,671
400,000
(5,448)
(36,918)
137,045
1,896
(8,982)
(546)
—
730,719
63,905
Net cash provided by financing activities
538,636
693,801
63,905
(794,624)
501,718
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash
equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of
year
(173,567)
(918)
730
476,847
37,330
18,346
—
—
(173,755)
532,523
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
$
303,280
$
36,412
$
19,076
$
— $
358,768
93
Note 23. Quarterly Results (unaudited)
The following tables present our consolidated quarterly results for the years ended November 30, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands,
except per share amounts):
2016
Revenues
Gross profits
Inventory impairment and land option contract
abandonment charges
Pretax income
Net income
Earnings per share:
Basic
Diluted
2015
Revenues
Gross profits
Inventory impairment and land option contract
abandonment charges
Pretax income
Net income
Earnings per share:
Basic
Diluted
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
$
678,371
$
811,050
$
913,283
$
1,191,942
108,694
121,465
151,902
167,667
1,966
16,027
13,127
11,740
24,797
15,597
3,052
53,463
39,363
$
$
.15
.14
$
.18
.17
$
.46
.42
$
580,121
$
622,969
$
843,157
$
86,739
448
10,499
7,799
97,631
133,099
536
12,673
9,573
3,532
33,954
23,254
36,054
55,028
37,528
.44
.40
985,783
171,482
5,075
69,917
44,017
$
$
.08
.08
$
.10
.10
$
.25
.23
.48
.43
Quarterly and year-to-date computations of per share amounts are made independently. Therefore, the sum of per share
amounts for the quarters may not agree with per share amounts for the year.
Note 24. Subsequent Event
On December 14, 2016, we elected to exercise our optional redemption rights under the terms of our 9.10% Senior Notes due
2017, which mature on September 15, 2017. On January 13, 2017, we redeemed $100.0 million in aggregate principal amount
of the notes outstanding at the redemption price calculated in accordance with the “make-whole” provisions of the notes. We used
internally generated cash to fund this redemption. Upon this redemption, $165.0 million in aggregate principal amount of the
notes remained outstanding. In connection with this early extinguishment of debt, we will recognize a charge of approximately
$5.4 million in the 2017 first quarter. Additional information about the redemption is set forth in our Current Report on Form
8-K dated December 15, 2016.
94
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of KB Home:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of KB Home as of November 30, 2016 and 2015, and the
related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended November 30, 2016. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures
in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial
position of KB Home at November 30, 2016 and 2015, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each
of the three years in the period ended November 30, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
KB Home’s internal control over financial reporting as of November 30, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control —
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 Framework)
and our report dated January 27, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
As discussed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in this report, the Company changed its presentation of debt
issuance costs as a result of the adoption of the amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification resulting from
Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-03, “Interest — Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation
of Debt Issuance Costs,” effective November 30, 2016.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Los Angeles, California
January 27, 2017
95
Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
None.
Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We have established disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that information we are required to disclose in the reports
we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and accumulated and communicated to management,
including our Chief Executive Officer (“Principal Executive Officer”) and Chief Financial Officer (“Principal Financial Officer”),
as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Under the supervision and with the participation of senior
management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, we evaluated our disclosure controls and
procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, our
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective
as of November 30, 2016.
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
(a) Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such
term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Under the supervision and with the participation of senior management,
including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting based on the Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) established by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on the evaluation under that framework and applicable SEC rules, our
management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of November 30, 2016.
Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited our consolidated financial statements
included in this annual report, has issued its report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of
November 30, 2016, which is presented below.
(b) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of KB Home:
We have audited KB Home’s internal control over financial reporting as of November 30, 2016, based on criteria established
in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(2013 Framework) (the COSO criteria). KB Home’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the
accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control
over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in
the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that
(1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation
of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
96
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, KB Home maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of
November 30, 2016, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
the consolidated balance sheets of KB Home as of November 30, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended November 30,
2016 of KB Home and our report dated January 27, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Los Angeles, California
January 27, 2017
(c) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended November 30, 2016 that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information for this item for executive officers is provided above in the “Executive Officers of the Registrant” section
in this report. Except as stated below, the other information for this item will be provided to the extent applicable in the “Corporate
Governance and Board Matters,” “Election of Directors,” “Ownership of KB Home Securities” and “Annual Meeting, Voting and
Other Information” sections in our Proxy Statement for our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (“2017 Proxy Statement”) and
is incorporated herein by this reference.
Ethics Policy
We have adopted an ethics policy for our directors, officers (including our principal executive officer, principal financial
officer and principal accounting officer) and employees. The ethics policy is available on our investor relations website at http://
investor.kbhome.com. Stockholders may request a free copy of the ethics policy from:
KB Home
Attention: Investor Relations
10990 Wilshire Boulevard
Los Angeles, California 90024
(310) 231-4000
investorrelations@kbhome.com
Within the time period required by the SEC and the New York Stock Exchange, we will post on our investor relations website
any amendment to our ethics policy and any waiver applicable to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer or
principal accounting officer, or persons performing similar functions, and our other executive officers or directors.
Corporate Governance Principles
We have adopted corporate governance principles, which are available on our investor relations website. Stockholders may
request a free copy of the corporate governance principles from the address, phone number and e-mail address stated above under
“Ethics Policy.”
97
Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information for this item will be provided in the “Corporate Governance and Board Matters” and “Compensation
Discussion and Analysis” sections in our 2017 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by this reference.
Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Except as provided below, the information for this item will be provided in the“Ownership of KB Home Securities” section
in our 2017 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by this reference.
The following table presents information as of November 30, 2016 with respect to shares of our common stock that may be
issued under our existing equity compensation plans:
Equity Compensation Plan Information
Number of
common shares to
be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and
rights
(a)
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(b)
Number of common
shares remaining
available for future
issuance under equity
compensation plans
(excluding common
shares reflected in
column(a))
(c)
Plan category
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders
12,731,545
$
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders
—
Total
12,731,545
$
18.95
—
18.95
7,034,523
— (1)
7,034,523
(1) Represents a prior non-employee directors compensation plan under which our non-employee directors received Director
Plan SARs, which were initially granted as cash-settled instruments. As discussed in Note 17 – Stockholders’ Equity in the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in this report, all non-employee directors serving on our board of directors have
elected to receive shares of our common stock in settlement of their Director Plan SARs under the terms of the plan. We
consider this non-employee director compensation plan as having no available capacity to issue shares of our common stock.
Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information for this item will be provided in the “Corporate Governance and Board Matters” section in our 2017 Proxy
Statement and is incorporated herein by this reference.
Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information for this item will be provided in the “Independent Auditor Fees and Services” section in our 2017 Proxy
Statement and is incorporated herein by this reference.
98
Item 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a) 1. Financial Statements
PART IV
Reference is made to the index set forth on page 46 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
2. Financial Statement Schedules
Financial statement schedules have been omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is
provided in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
3. Exhibits
Exhibit
Number
Description
3.1
3.2
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
4.10
4.11
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated
April 7, 2009 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Amended and Restated By-Laws of KB Home, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated July
18, 2014 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Rights Agreement between us and Mellon Investor Services LLC, as rights agent, dated January 22, 2009, filed
as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K/A dated January 28, 2009 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated
by reference herein.
Indenture relating to our Senior Notes among us, the Guarantors party thereto and Sun Trust Bank, Atlanta, dated
January 28, 2004, filed as an exhibit to our Registration Statement No. 333-114761 on Form S-4, is incorporated
by reference herein.
Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated August 17, 2007, relating to our Senior Notes by and between us, the
Guarantors named therein, and the Trustee, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated August 22,
2007 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 30, 2012, relating to our Senior Notes by and between us, the
Guarantors named therein, and the Trustee, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated February
2, 2012 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 11, 2013, relating to our Senior Notes by and among us,
the Guarantors named therein, and the Trustee, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated
January 11, 2013 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Specimen of 7 1/4% Senior Notes due 2018, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 3,
2006 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of officers’ certificates and guarantors’ certificates establishing the terms of the 7 1/4% Senior Notes due
2018, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 3, 2006 (File No. 001-09195), is
incorporated by reference herein.
Specimen of 9.100% Senior Notes due 2017, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated July
30, 2009 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of officers’ certificates and guarantors’ certificates establishing the terms of the 9.100% Senior Notes due
2017, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 30, 2009 (File No. 001-09195), is
incorporated by reference herein.
Specimen of 8.00% Senior Notes due 2020, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated February
7, 2012 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of officers’ certificates and guarantors’ certificates establishing the terms of the 8.00% Senior Notes due
2020, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 7, 2012 (File No. 001-09195), is
incorporated by reference herein.
99
Exhibit
Number
4.12
4.13
4.14
4.15
4.16
4.17
4.18
4.19
4.20
4.21
4.22
4.23
4.24
10.1*
10.2*
10.3*
10.4*
Description
Specimen of 7.50% Senior Notes due 2022, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated July
31, 2012 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of officers’ certificates and guarantors’ certificates establishing the terms of the 7.50% Senior Notes due
2022, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 31, 2012 (File No. 001-09195), is
incorporated by reference herein.
Form of officers’ certificate and guarantors’ officers’ certificates establishing the form and terms of the 1.375%
Convertible Senior Notes due 2019, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 29,
2013 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of 1.375% Convertible Senior Notes due 2019, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated
January 29, 2013 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of supplemental officers’ certificate and guarantors’ officers’ certificates establishing the form and terms
of the 1.375% Convertible Senior Notes due 2019, filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended February 28, 2013 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 12, 2013, by and among us, the Guarantors party thereto, the
Additional Guarantors named therein and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, filed as an exhibit to our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2013 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by
reference herein.
Specimen of 7.00% Senior Notes due 2021, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated October
29, 2013 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of officers’ certificates and guarantors’ certificates establishing the terms of the 7.00% Senior Notes due
2021, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 29, 2013 (File No. 001-09195), is
incorporated by reference herein.
Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 28, 2014, by and among us, the Guarantors party thereto,
the Additional Guarantors named therein and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee, filed as an exhibit to
our Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to Form S-3 Registration Statement (No. 333-176930), is incorporated by
reference herein.
Specimen of 4.75% Senior Notes due 2019, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated March
25, 2014 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of officers’ certificates and guarantors’ certificates establishing the terms of the 4.75% Senior Notes due
2019, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 25, 2014 (File No. 001-09195), is
incorporated by reference herein.
Form of 7.625% Senior Notes due 2023, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated February
17, 2015 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of officers’ certificates and guarantors’ certificates establishing the terms of the 7.625% Senior Notes due
2023, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 17, 2015 (File No. 001-09195), is
incorporated by reference herein.
Kaufman and Broad, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of July 11, 1985, filed as an exhibit
to our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Amendment to Kaufman and Broad, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan for amounts earned or vested
on or after January 1, 2005, effective January 1, 2009, filed as an exhibit to our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-
K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
KB Home 1988 Employee Stock Plan, as amended and restated on October 2, 2008, filed as an exhibit to our
2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
KB Home Performance-Based Incentive Plan for Senior Management, as amended and restated on October 2,
2008, filed as an exhibit to our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by
reference herein.
100
Exhibit
Number
10.5*
10.6
10.7
10.8*
10.9*
10.10*
10.11*
10.12*
10.13*
10.14*
10.15*
10.16*
10.17*
10.18*
10.19*
10.20*
10.21*
10.22*
10.23*
Description
Form of Stock Option Agreement under KB Home Performance-Based Incentive Plan for Senior Management,
filed as an exhibit to our 1995 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference
herein.
KB Home Directors’ Legacy Program, as amended January 1, 1999, filed as an exhibit to our 1998 Annual Report
on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Trust Agreement between Kaufman and Broad Home Corporation and Wachovia Bank, N.A. as Trustee, dated
as of August 27, 1999, filed as an exhibit to our 1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is
incorporated by reference herein.
Amended and Restated KB Home 1999 Incentive Plan, as amended and restated on October 2, 2008, filed as an
exhibit to our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under our Amended and Restated 1999 Incentive Plan, filed as
an exhibit to our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
KB Home 2001 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated on October 2, 2008, filed as an exhibit to our
2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of Stock Option Agreement under our 2001 Stock Incentive Plan, filed as an exhibit to our 2011 Annual
Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
KB Home Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan with respect to deferrals prior to January 1, 2005, effective
March 1, 2001, filed as an exhibit to our 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated
by reference herein.
KB Home Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan with respect to deferrals on and after January 1, 2005,
effective January 1, 2009 (File No. 001-09195), filed as an exhibit to our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, is
incorporated by reference herein.
KB Home Change in Control Severance Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009, filed as an
exhibit to our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
KB Home Death Benefit Only Plan, filed as an exhibit to our 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No.
001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Amendment No. 1 to the KB Home Death Benefit Only Plan, effective as of January 1, 2009, filed as an exhibit
to our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
KB Home Retirement Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009, filed as an exhibit to our 2008
Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Employment Agreement of Jeffrey T. Mezger, dated February 28, 2007, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report
on Form 8-K dated March 6, 2007 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Amendment to the Employment Agreement of Jeffrey T. Mezger, dated December 24, 2008, filed as an exhibit
to our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Employment Agreement between us and Jeffrey T. Mezger dated as
of February 28, 2007, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 18, 2007 (File No.
001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Amended and Restated 1999 Incentive Plan for stock option grant
to Jeffrey T. Mezger, filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31,
2007 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Policy Regarding Stockholder Approval of Certain Severance Payments, adopted July 10, 2008, filed as an exhibit
to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 15, 2008 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
KB Home Executive Severance Plan, filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended August 31, 2008 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
101
Exhibit
Number
10.24
10.25
10.26*
10.27*
10.28*
10.29*
10.30*
10.31*
10.32
10.33*
10.34*
10.35*
10.36*
10.37*
10.38*
10.39*
10.40*
10.41*
10.42*
Description
Amendment to Trust Agreement by and between KB Home and Wachovia Bank, N.A., dated August 24, 2009,
filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2009 (File No.
001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of Indemnification Agreement, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 2, 2010
(File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
KB Home 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended February 28, 2010 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of Stock Option Award Agreement under the KB Home 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as an exhibit to
our Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 20, 2010 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the KB Home 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as an exhibit
to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 20, 2010 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
KB Home 2010 Equity Incentive Plan Stock Option Agreement for performance stock option grant to Jeffrey T.
Mezger, filed as an exhibit to our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by
reference herein.
Amendment to the KB Home 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2011 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Executive Severance Benefit Decisions, filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended February 28, 2011 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Consensual agreement effective June 10, 2011, filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended August 31, 2011 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
KB Home 2010 Equity Incentive Plan Stock Option Agreement for performance stock option grant to Jeffrey T.
Mezger, filed as an exhibit to our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by
reference herein.
Form of KB Home 2010 Equity Incentive Plan Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement,
filed as an exhibit to our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference
herein.
KB Home 2010 Equity Incentive Plan Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for
performance-based restricted stock unit award to Jeffrey T. Mezger, filed as an exhibit to our 2012 Annual Report
on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of KB Home 2010 Equity Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, filed as an exhibit to
our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
KB Home 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended February 28, 2014 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Amendment to Amended and Restated KB Home 1999 Incentive Plan Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement,
effective July 17, 2014, filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August
31, 2014 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Amendment to KB Home 2001 Stock Incentive Plan Stock Option Agreement, effective July 17, 2014, filed as
an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2014 (File No. 001-09195),
is incorporated by reference herein.
Amendment to KB Home Performance Based Incentive Plan for Senior Management Stock Option Agreement,
effective July 17, 2014, filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August
31, 2014 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of Stock Option Agreement under the KB Home 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as an exhibit to our
Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 14, 2014 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the KB Home 2014 Equity Incentive
Plan, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 14, 2014 (File No. 001-09195), is
incorporated by reference herein.
102
Exhibit
Number
10.43*
10.44*
10.45
10.46
10.47*
10.48*
Description
Form of Performance Cash Award Agreement under the KB Home 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as an exhibit
to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 14, 2014 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference
herein.
Form of Restricted Cash Award Agreement under the KB Home 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as an exhibit
to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 14, 2014 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference
herein.
Fourth Amended and Restated KB Home Non-Employee Directors Compensation Plan, effective as of October 9,
2014, filed as an exhibit to our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by
reference herein.
Amended and Restated Revolving Loan Agreement, dated as of August 7, 2015, among us, the banks party
thereto, and Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended August 31, 2015 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the KB Home 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as an exhibit to our
2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Amended KB Home 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, effective April 7, 2016, filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2016 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference
herein.
12.1†
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
21†
23†
31.1†
31.2†
32.1†
32.2†
101†
Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Certification of Jeffrey T. Mezger, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of KB Home Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of Jeff J. Kaminski, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of KB Home Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of Jeffrey T. Mezger, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of KB Home Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of Jeff J. Kaminski, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of KB Home Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
The following materials from KB Home’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended November 30, 2016,
formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (a) Consolidated Statements of Operations for
the years ended November 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, (b) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for
the years ended November 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, (c) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of November 30, 2016
and 2015, (d) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended November 30, 2016, 2015
and 2014, (e) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended November 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014,
and (f) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement in which executive officers are eligible to participate.
† Document filed with this Form 10-K.
Item 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.
103
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
SIGNATURES
KB Home
By:
/S/ JEFF J. KAMINSKI
Jeff J. Kaminski
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date:
January 27, 2017
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following
persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
Signature
/S/ JEFFREY T. MEZGER
Jeffrey T. Mezger
Title
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
/S/ JEFF J. KAMINSKI
Jeff J. Kaminski
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
/S/ WILLIAM R. HOLLINGER
William R. Hollinger
Senior Vice President and
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date
January 27, 2017
January 27, 2017
January 27, 2017
/S/ TIMOTHY W. FINCHEM
Director
January 27, 2017
Timothy W. Finchem
/S/ STUART A. GABRIEL
Director
January 27, 2017
Stuart A. Gabriel
/S/ THOMAS W. GILLIGAN
Director
January 27, 2017
Thomas W. Gilligan
/S/ KENNETH M. JASTROW, II
Director
January 27, 2017
Kenneth M. Jastrow, II
/S/ ROBERT L. JOHNSON
Director
January 27, 2017
Robert L. Johnson
/S/ MELISSA LORA
Director
January 27, 2017
Melissa Lora
/s/ ROBERT L. PATTON, JR.
Director
January 27, 2017
Robert L. Patton, Jr.
/S/ MICHAEL M. WOOD
Director
January 27, 2017
Michael M. Wood
104
LIST OF EXHIBITS FILED
Exhibit
Number
Description
Sequential
Page
Number
3.1
3.2
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
4.7
4.8
4.9
4.10
4.11
4.12
4.13
4.14
4.15
4.16
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on
Form 8-K dated April 7, 2009 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Amended and Restated By-Laws of KB Home, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form
8-K dated July 18, 2014 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Rights Agreement between us and Mellon Investor Services LLC, as rights agent, dated January 22,
2009, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K/A dated January 28, 2009 (File No.
001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Indenture relating to our Senior Notes among us, the Guarantors party thereto and Sun Trust Bank,
Atlanta, dated January 28, 2004, filed as an exhibit to our Registration Statement No. 333-114761
on Form S-4, is incorporated by reference herein.
Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated August 17, 2007, relating to our Senior Notes by and between
us, the Guarantors named therein, and the Trustee, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on
Form 8-K dated August 22, 2007 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 30, 2012, relating to our Senior Notes by and
between us, the Guarantors named therein, and the Trustee, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report
on Form 8-K dated February 2, 2012 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 11, 2013, relating to our Senior Notes by and
among us, the Guarantors named therein, and the Trustee, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report
on Form 8-K dated January 11, 2013 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Specimen of 7 1/4% Senior Notes due 2018, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-
K dated April 3, 2006 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of officers’ certificates and guarantors’ certificates establishing the terms of the 7 1/4% Senior
Notes due 2018, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 3, 2006 (File
No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Specimen of 9.100% Senior Notes due 2017, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-
K dated July 30, 2009 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of officers’ certificates and guarantors’ certificates establishing the terms of the 9.100% Senior
Notes due 2017, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 30, 2009 (File
No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Specimen of 8.00% Senior Notes due 2020, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-
K dated February 7, 2012 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of officers’ certificates and guarantors’ certificates establishing the terms of the 8.00% Senior
Notes due 2020, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 7, 2012
(File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Specimen of 7.50% Senior Notes due 2022, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-
K dated July 31, 2012 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of officers’ certificates and guarantors’ certificates establishing the terms of the 7.50% Senior
Notes due 2022, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 31, 2012 (File
No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of officers’ certificate and guarantors’ officers’ certificates establishing the form and terms
of the 1.375% Convertible Senior Notes due 2019, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on
Form 8-K dated January 29, 2013 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of 1.375% Convertible Senior Notes due 2019, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on
Form 8-K dated January 29, 2013 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of supplemental officers’ certificate and guarantors’ officers’ certificates establishing the form
and terms of the 1.375% Convertible Senior Notes due 2019, filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2013 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated
by reference herein.
105
Exhibit
Number
4.17
4.18
4.19
4.20
4.21
4.22
4.23
4.24
10.1*
10.2*
10.3*
10.4*
10.5*
10.6
10.7
10.8*
10.9*
Description
Sequential
Page
Number
Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 12, 2013, by and among us, the Guarantors party
thereto, the Additional Guarantors named therein and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee,
filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2013 (File
No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Specimen of 7.00% Senior Notes due 2021, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-
K dated October 29, 2013 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of officers’ certificates and guarantors’ certificates establishing the terms of the 7.00% Senior
Notes due 2021, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 29, 2013
(File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 28, 2014, by and among us, the Guarantors
party thereto, the Additional Guarantors named therein and U.S. Bank National Association, as
Trustee, filed as an exhibit to our Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to Form S-3 Registration
Statement (No. 333-176930), is incorporated by reference herein.
Specimen of 4.75% Senior Notes due 2019, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-
K dated March 25, 2014 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of officers’ certificates and guarantors’ certificates establishing the terms of the 4.75% Senior
Notes due 2019, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 25, 2014 (File
No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of 7.625% Senior Notes due 2023, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K
dated February 17, 2015 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of officers’ certificates and guarantors’ certificates establishing the terms of the 7.625% Senior
Notes due 2023, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 17, 2015
(File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Kaufman and Broad, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of July 11, 1985,
filed as an exhibit to our 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated
by reference herein.
Amendment to Kaufman and Broad, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan for amounts
earned or vested on or after January 1, 2005, effective January 1, 2009, filed as an exhibit to our
2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
KB Home 1988 Employee Stock Plan, as amended and restated on October 2, 2008, filed as an
exhibit to our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference
herein.
KB Home Performance-Based Incentive Plan for Senior Management, as amended and restated
on October 2, 2008, filed as an exhibit to our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No.
001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of Stock Option Agreement under KB Home Performance-Based Incentive Plan for Senior
Management, filed as an exhibit to our 1995 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195),
is incorporated by reference herein.
KB Home Directors’ Legacy Program, as amended January 1, 1999, filed as an exhibit to our 1998
Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Trust Agreement between Kaufman and Broad Home Corporation and Wachovia Bank, N.A. as
Trustee, dated as of August 27, 1999, filed as an exhibit to our 1999 Annual Report on Form 10-
K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Amended and Restated KB Home 1999 Incentive Plan, as amended and restated on October 2,
2008, filed as an exhibit to our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is
incorporated by reference herein.
Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement under our Amended and Restated 1999 Incentive
Plan, filed as an exhibit to our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is
incorporated by reference herein.
106
Exhibit
Number
10.10*
10.11*
10.12*
10.13*
10.14*
10.15*
10.16*
10.17*
10.18*
10.19*
10.20*
10.21*
10.22*
10.23*
10.24
10.25
10.26*
10.27*
Description
Sequential
Page
Number
KB Home 2001 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated on October 2, 2008, filed as an
exhibit to our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference
herein.
Form of Stock Option Agreement under our 2001 Stock Incentive Plan, filed as an exhibit to our
2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
KB Home Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan with respect to deferrals prior to January 1,
2005, effective March 1, 2001, filed as an exhibit to our 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File
No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
KB Home Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan with respect to deferrals on and after
January 1, 2005, effective January 1, 2009 (File No. 001-09195), filed as an exhibit to our 2008
Annual Report on Form 10-K, is incorporated by reference herein.
KB Home Change in Control Severance Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009,
filed as an exhibit to our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated
by reference herein.
KB Home Death Benefit Only Plan, filed as an exhibit to our 2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K
(File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Amendment No. 1 to the KB Home Death Benefit Only Plan, effective as of January 1, 2009, filed
as an exhibit to our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by
reference herein.
KB Home Retirement Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2009, filed as an exhibit
to our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Employment Agreement of Jeffrey T. Mezger, dated February 28, 2007, filed as an exhibit to our
Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 6, 2007 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by
reference herein.
Amendment to the Employment Agreement of Jeffrey T. Mezger, dated December 24, 2008, filed
as an exhibit to our 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by
reference herein.
Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Employment Agreement between us and Jeffrey T.
Mezger dated as of February 28, 2007, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated
July 18, 2007 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of Stock Option Agreement under the Amended and Restated 1999 Incentive Plan for stock
option grant to Jeffrey T. Mezger, filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended August 31, 2007 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Policy Regarding Stockholder Approval of Certain Severance Payments, adopted July 10, 2008,
filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 15, 2008 (File No. 001-09195),
is incorporated by reference herein.
KB Home Executive Severance Plan, filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended August 31, 2008 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Amendment to Trust Agreement by and between KB Home and Wachovia Bank, N.A., dated
August 24, 2009, filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
August 31, 2009 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of Indemnification Agreement, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated
April 2, 2010 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
KB Home 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended February 28, 2010 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of Stock Option Award Agreement under the KB Home 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as
an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 20, 2010 (File No. 001-09195), is
incorporated by reference herein.
107
Exhibit
Number
10.28*
10.29*
10.30*
10.31*
10.32
10.33*
10.34*
10.35*
10.36*
10.37*
10.38*
10.39*
10.40*
10.41*
10.42*
10.43*
10.44*
Description
Sequential
Page
Number
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement under the KB Home 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, filed
as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 20, 2010 (File No. 001-09195), is
incorporated by reference herein.
KB Home 2010 Equity Incentive Plan Stock Option Agreement for performance stock option grant
to Jeffrey T. Mezger, filed as an exhibit to our 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No.
001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Amendment to the KB Home 2010 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 28, 2011 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by
reference herein.
Executive Severance Benefit Decisions, filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended February 28, 2011 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Consensual agreement effective June 10, 2011, filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2011 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference
herein.
KB Home 2010 Equity Incentive Plan Stock Option Agreement for performance stock option grant
to Jeffrey T. Mezger, filed as an exhibit to our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No.
001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of KB Home 2010 Equity Incentive Plan Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award
Agreement, filed as an exhibit to our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is
incorporated by reference herein.
KB Home 2010 Equity Incentive Plan Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement
for performance-based restricted stock unit award to Jeffrey T. Mezger, filed as an exhibit to our
2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of KB Home 2010 Equity Incentive Plan Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement, filed as
an exhibit to our 2012 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by
reference herein.
KB Home 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended February 28, 2014 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Amendment to Amended and Restated KB Home 1999 Incentive Plan Non-Qualified Stock Option
Agreement, effective July 17, 2014, filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended August 31, 2014 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Amendment to KB Home 2001 Stock Incentive Plan Stock Option Agreement, effective July 17,
2014, filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31,
2014 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Amendment to KB Home Performance Based Incentive Plan for Senior Management Stock Option
Agreement, effective July 17, 2014, filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended August 31, 2014 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of Stock Option Agreement under the KB Home 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as an
exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 14, 2014 (File No. 001-09195), is
incorporated by reference herein.
Form of Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the KB Home 2014
Equity Incentive Plan, filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 14,
2014 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of Performance Cash Award Agreement under the KB Home 2014 Equity Incentive Plan,
filed as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 14, 2014 (File No. 001-09195),
is incorporated by reference herein.
Form of Restricted Cash Award Agreement under the KB Home 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, filed
as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K dated October 14, 2014 (File No. 001-09195), is
incorporated by reference herein.
108
Exhibit
Number
10.45
10.46
10.47*
10.48*
Description
Sequential
Page
Number
Fourth Amended and Restated KB Home Non-Employee Directors Compensation Plan, effective
as of October 9, 2014, filed as an exhibit to our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No.
001-09195), is incorporated by reference herein.
Amended and Restated Revolving Loan Agreement, dated as of August 7, 2015, among us, the
banks party thereto, and Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent, filed as an exhibit to our Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2015 (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated
by reference herein.
Form of Restricted Stock Agreement under the KB Home 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, filed as an
exhibit to our 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 001-09195), is incorporated by reference
herein.
Amended KB Home 2014 Equity Incentive Plan, effective April 7, 2016, filed as an exhibit to our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2016 (File No. 001-09195), is
incorporated by reference herein.
12.1†
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
21†
23†
31.1†
31.2†
32.1†
32.2†
101†
Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Certification of Jeffrey T. Mezger, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of KB Home
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of Jeff J. Kaminski, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of KB Home
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Certification of Jeffrey T. Mezger, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of KB Home
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
Certification of Jeff J. Kaminski, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of KB Home
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
The following materials from KB Home’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
November 30, 2016, formatted
in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL):
(a) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended November 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014,
(b) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended November 30, 2016,
2015 and 2014, (c) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of November 30, 2016 and 2015,
(d) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended November 30, 2016, 2015
and 2014, (e) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended November 30, 2016,
2015 and 2014, and (f) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement in which executive officers are eligible to participate.
† Document filed with this Form 10-K.
109
(This page intentionally left blank)
(This page intentionally left blank)
(This page intentionally left blank)
STOCKHOLDER INFORMATION
FORM 10-K
KB Home’s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission is
available online at investor.kbhome.com. It may also be
obtained without charge by written request to the
Investor Relations department at the Company’s mailing
address below or by email to investorrelations@
kbhome.com.
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Ernst & Young LLP
Los Angeles, California
CORPORATE OFFICE
KB Home
10990 Wilshire Boulevard
Los Angeles, California 90024
(310) 231-4000
COMMUNITY INFORMATION
For information about our communities, please visit us
at kbhome.com or call (888) KB-HOMES.
COMMON STOCK PRICES
2016
2015
High
Low
High
Low
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
$14.50 $ 9.04 $17.57 $11.76
13.21
13.50
12.72
14.92
16.76
16.57
16.37
17.42
15.53
12.20
13.66
14.06
DIVIDEND DATA
KB Home declared and paid quarterly cash dividends
of $.025 per common share in 2016 and 2015.
ANNUAL STOCKHOLDERS MEETING
The 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders will be held
at KB Home’s corporate office at 9:00 a.m., Pacific
Time, on Thursday, April 13, 2017.
STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING
KB Home’s common stock is traded on the New York
Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “KBH.”
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR
Computershare Inc.
211 Quality Circle, Suite 210
College Station, Texas 77845
(888) 667-7640
computershare.com/investor
BONDHOLDER SERVICES
U.S. Bank Global Corporate Trust Services
Attn: Bondholder Services – EP-MN-WS2N
111 Fillmore Avenue East
St. Paul, Minnesota 55107
(800) 934-6802
usbank.com
KB HOME
10990 Wilshire Boulevard
Los Angeles, California 90024
(310) 231-4000
www.kbhome.com