WEARABLE TECHNOLOGY. THE FUTURE.
DISPLAY
ASICs
OPOP
OPTICS
SPEECH
ENHANCEMENT
ERGONOMICS
SOFTWARE
PACKAGING
2 0 13 A N NUA L R E P O R T
Kopin is a leading developer and provider of innovative wearable technologies and headset
reference designs. Kopin’s technology portfolio includes ultra-small displays, optics, speech
enhancement technology, software, low-power chipsets, and ergonomically designed reference
headset computing systems.
WEARABLE TECHNOLOGY.
THE FUTURE.
Consumer head-worn
device market segment
expected to grow from
2013-2019*
2019
2018
2016
2014
$9.275
BILLION
485
MILLION UNITS3
$6.0 BILLION2
71.8%
PER YEAR*
$1.5 BILLION1
*September, 2013 Transparency Market Research 1Jupiter Research 2IMS Research 3ABI Research
1
DEAR SHAREHOLDERS,
2013 was a new beginning for us as we made the
transformational decision to commit solely to wearable
technologies in a headset form. We believed the timing
was ripe for explosive growth of wearable devices
because of the availability of cloud, miniaturization of
components and improvements in voice recognition
technology. The introduction of several wearable
products targeted at consumers in 2013 was a catalyst
for a lot of public interest in wearable devices, and in
particular wearable headsets. The market size of wear-
able devices is projected to grow more than 70 percent
a year, from an estimated $1.5 billion in 2013 to nearly
$9.3 billion in 2019.
We believe the headset is the ultimate wearable device
since most of the important human inputs and outputs—
sight, audio and voice—are all on our head and enable
us to see, hear, and communicate. However, designing
a good headset—natural looking, comfortable to wear,
easy to use and useful—is very challenging and requires
a number of key technologies. First, a compact display
module, consisting of a microdisplay, backlight and
optics, is essential to provide a bright, sharp image
to the eye. Reliable speech recognition even in a very
noisy environment is also essential for the success of
headsets. Excellent noise cancellation that does not
distort the voice signal is needed for accurate web
searches and communication. Operating and application
software which provide intuitive user interface are needed
to create useful functions leading to fast adoption. As
in all mobile devices, low power consumption is critical.
Finally, all of the technology must be contained in a
fashionable ergonomically sound form factor.
Since we announced our transition to the wearable com-
puting space nearly 15 months ago, our progress is on
track. Already we’re a global leader driving advances in
the wearable headset. Over the last five years, we have
accumulated the critical headset technologies into our
portfolio: displays, optics, low-power circuits, software,
speech enhancement, ergonomics and packaging. In
particular, we have:
(cid:85)(cid:202)(cid:202)Pioneered the wearable computing headset market.
We introduced the first Golden-i industrial headset
computing reference design in 2008. We licensed it
to Motorola Solutions, which introduced the world’s
first commercial headset computer product in 2013.
We have continued to improve our industrial wearable
headset designs and developed innovative new
concepts systems for consumer and enterprise
applications.
(cid:85)(cid:202)(cid:202)Continually improved our unique transmissive display
technology for smaller size, lower power and higher
brightness.
(cid:85)(cid:202)(cid:202)Made strategic investments in and acquisitions of
companies that provide us with critical technologies
for wearable headsets. To complement our transmis-
sive display technology, we acquired Forth Dimension
Displays for its reflective microdisplay technology,
which allows us to offer our customers a broader range
of solutions. We acquired a majority stake in Ikanos
Consulting Ltd, a software-development company that
has developed our hands-free, voice-centric operating
system and other application software. We acquired
patents and know-how from Aurisound, providing
superior noise cancellation and speech-enhancement
technologies to our portfolio. And we acquired a major-
ity stake in e-MDT America, Inc., who have expertise
in display driver IC development and total system
power reduction.
(cid:85)(cid:202)(cid:202)Created strategic partnerships with technology leaders.
For example, we partnered with Olympus Corporation,
which developed innovative PupilTM optics technology.
The Pupil see-through optics has its height smaller
than the pupil of the human eye, which provides the
perception of see-through so the user’s view is not
obstructed. Our compact microdisplays are a perfect
match for the Pupil optics to provide the most compact
display module that exhibits vivid and bright images,
even under full sunlight.
(cid:85)(cid:202)(cid:202)Opened a wearable tech center in Silicon Valley with
a state-of-the-art acoustics lab for improving voice
technology, prototyping, testing and refining wearable
solutions.
2
(cid:85)(cid:202)(cid:202)Accumulated more than 250 patents granted or
pending in every vital area of wearable technologies.
Since January of last year, we have filed more than
80 additional patents related to wearable technology
solutions.
Our business model is to license our reference designs
and sell critical components and we believe this model
will generate high gross margins and has strong growth
potential. Our customers benefit from our complete
solution approach by accelerating their time to market
and reducing their product development risk. We are
seeing what we anticipated in terms of increased interest
by potential partners and customers. While we are
restricted in what we can say regarding who we are
working with and what types of projects we are working
on, there are a number of recent developments that
further confirm our progress.
In February of 2014, we hosted a Wearable Technology
Event and an Open House of our Wearable Technology
Center in Silicon Valley. We attracted well over 200
representatives from all facets of industry, including
customers and potential customers, analysts, media,
and partners. The energy and anticipation of big things
to come was strong, and it was clear that wearable
technologies are a real technology category poised for
strong growth!
At the event we showed a reference design for the dream
product of the wearable market—a pair of eyeglasses
virtually indistinguishable from the pair many people
wear today. These eyeglasses included innovations from
all aspects of our portfolio, including our Pupil display
module, noise cancellation and natural speech recogni-
tion software, ergonomic designs and low power ASICS.
We are midway through our transformation into the pre-
eminent developer of components, reference systems
and total systems for the wearable headset space. In
2014 we will continue investing in technology, refine
our Golden-i industrial reference designs, introduce
consumer-oriented reference designs and create new
partnerships with customers who seek to provide their
own branded wearable products. We closed 2013 with
strong momentum and we expect to build on it through
2014 into 2015 when we believe wearable headsets will
become mainstream.
Our balance sheet is strong with cash and equivalents
of $112.7 million and no debt at year end 2013, leaving
us with the resources to sustain ourselves well beyond
this transition.
The trends of advancing technology and greater mobile
connectivity continue to reinforce our vision of the wear-
able space. Indeed, we believe that by 2015, we will see
wearable technology really become a bigger part of
everyday life. This reflects our conviction that the future
is cloud-based, hands-free and voice-activated mobile
computing systems.
On behalf of our employees and our Board of Directors,
I thank all of our shareholders who continue to support
Kopin in its efforts.
Sincerely
John C.C. Fan, Ph.D.
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
March 27, 2014
3
AREAS OF OPERATION
Kopin’s design centers, manufacturing operations and
sales offices are located in the following markets:
(cid:115)(cid:0)Headquarters and Display Manufacturing: Westborough, MA
(cid:115) Wearable Tech Center: Santa Clara, CA; Application Design Center: Scotts Valley, CA
(cid:115)(cid:0)(cid:0)Display Manufacturing: Dalgety Bay, Scotland and Seoul, South Korea
(cid:115) Software Development: Nottingham, England
(cid:115) Design Center: Hong Kong
(cid:115) Sales Office: Japan
(cid:115)(cid:0)(cid:42)(cid:79)(cid:73)(cid:78)(cid:84)(cid:0)(cid:54)(cid:69)(cid:78)(cid:84)(cid:85)(cid:82)(cid:69)(cid:26)(cid:0)(cid:35)(cid:72)(cid:73)(cid:78)(cid:65)
30+
MILLION
200+
PATENTS
Over 30 million
displays sold to global
consumer electronic companies.
Over 200 Patents Globally
(Display, software, speech enhancement,
noise cancellation, ergonomics
wearable systems)
4
Financial Information and Form 10-K
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
(in thousands, except per share data)
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
Revenues
Gross profit
Net (loss) income
Continuing operations
Discontinued operations
Net (loss) income attributable
to controlling interest
Net (loss) income per share
Continuing operations
Discontinued operations
Net (loss) income per share
$ 22,898
$ 34,642
$ 64,659
$ 58,141
$ 68,203
$
(80) $ 9,257
$ 24,850
$ 19,372
$ 23,509
$ (25,753) $ (21,783) $ (6,029) $ 1,540
$ 7,300
$ 20,147
$ 2,789
$ 9,713
$ 10,739
$ 8,436
$ (4,710) $ (18,362) $ 3,079
$ 8,829
$ 19,443
$
$
$
(0.40) $
$
0.32
(0.33) $ (0.10) $ 0.02
$ 0.11
0.04
$ 0.15
$ 0.16
$ 0.13
(0.08) $
(0.29) $ 0.05
$ 0.13
$ 0.29
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
È ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 28, 2013
OR
‘ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from
to
Commission file number 0-19882
KOPIN CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)
125 North Drive, Westborough, MA
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
04-2833935
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
01581-3335
(Zip Code)
(508) 870-5959
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
(Title of Class)
Name of each exchange on which registered
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
NASDAQ Global Market
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes ‘ No È
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
Yes ‘ No È
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes È No ‘
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). È Yes ‘ No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and
will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference
in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ‘
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a
smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer ‘
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Non-Accelerated Filer ‘
Accelerated Filer È
Smaller Reporting Company ‘
Yes ‘ No È
As of June 29, 2013 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recent second fiscal quarter) the aggregate market value of
outstanding shares of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $235,280,802.
As of March 14, 2014, 65,790,407 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, were issued and
outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement relating to its 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated
by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K where indicated.
Part I
Forward Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including, without limitation, statements made relating to our
expectation that we will continue to pursue other U.S. government development contracts for applications that
relate to our commercial product applications; our expectation that we will prosecute and defend our
proprietary technology aggressively; our belief that it is important to retain personnel with experience and
expertise relevant to our business; our belief that our products are targeted towards markets that are still
developing and our competitive strength is creating new technologies; our belief that it is important to invest in
research and development to achieve profitability even during periods when we are not profitable; our belief that
we are a leading developer and manufacturer of advanced miniature displays; our belief that our products
enable our customers to develop and market an improved generation of products; our belief that that the
technical nature of our products and markets demands a commitment to close relationships with our customers;
our belief that our Golden-i industrial reference design will provide for increased worker productivity, safety and
improved manufacturing quality; our belief that our ability to develop and expand our wearable technologies
and to market and license our wearable technologies will be important for our revenue growth and ability to
achieve profitability and positive cash flow; the impact of the timing of development of the market segment for
our wearable computing products on our ability to grow revenues; our expectation that we will incur significant
development and marketing costs in 2014 to commercialize our wearable technologies; our statement that we
may make equity investments in companies; our expectation that KoBrite will incur additional losses in the near
term; our expectation that the operations at our Korean facility, Kowon, will cease and the cash and marketable
debt securities held by Kowon will eventually be remitted back to the U.S.; our expectation that revenue will be
between $18 million and $22 million for 2014; our ability to forecast our revenues and operating results; our
expectation that we will have a consolidated net loss in the range of $32 million to $40 million in 2014; our
expectation that excluding the effects of working capital, stock buybacks, and other investing activities our cash
usage will be between $30 million and $35 million to fund operations for fiscal year 2014; our expectation that
the U.S. government will significantly reduce funding for programs through which we sell high margin military
products; our belief that a strengthening of the U.S. dollar could increase the price of our products in foreign
markets; the impact of new regulations relating to conflict minerals on customer demands and increased costs
related to compliance with such regulations; our belief that our future success will depend primarily upon the
technical expertise, creative skills and management abilities of our officers and key employees rather than on
patent ownership; our belief that our extensive portfolio of patents, trade secrets and non-patented know-how
provides us with a competitive advantage in the wearable technologies market; our belief that our ability to
develop innovative products enhances our opportunity to grow within our targeted markets; our belief that
continued introduction of new products in our target markets is essential to our growth; our expectation that our
display products will benefit from further general technological advances in the design and production of
integrated circuits and active matrix LCDs, resulting in further improvements in resolution and miniaturization;
our belief that our manufacturing process offers greater miniaturization, reduced cost, higher pixel density, full
color capability and lower power consumption compared to conventional active matrix LCD manufacturing
approaches; our expectation not to pay cash dividends for the foreseeable future and to retain earnings for the
development of our businesses; our expectation that we will expend between $2.0 million and $3.0 million on
capital expenditures over the next twelve months; our expectation that competition will increase; our belief that
small form factor displays will be a critical component in the development of advanced wireless communications
systems; our belief that wireless handset makers are looking to create products that complement or eventually
replace wireless handsets; our belief that general technological advances in the design and fabrication of
integrated circuits, LCD technology and LCD manufacturing processes will allow us to continue to enhance our
display product manufacturing process; our belief that continued introduction of new products in our target
markets is essential to our growth; our belief that our available cash resources will support our operations and
capital needs for at least the next twelve months; our expectation that we will have taxes based on federal
alternative minimum tax rules and on our foreign operations in 2014; our expectation that we will have a state
tax provision in 2014; our expectation that the adoption of certain accounting standards will not have a material
2
impact on our financial position or results of operations; our belief that our business is not disproportionately
affected by climate change regulations; our belief that our operations have not been materially affected by
inflation; and our belief that the effect, if any, of reasonably possible near-term changes in interest rates on our
financial position, results of operations, and cash flows should not be material. These forward-looking
statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about the industries in which
we operate, management’s beliefs, and assumptions made by management. In addition, other written or oral
statements, which constitute forward-looking statements, may be made by or on behalf of us. Words such as
“expects”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “could”, “seeks”, “estimates”, and variations of such
words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are not
guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions, which are difficult to
predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ materially from what is expressed or forecasted in
such forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Factors that
could cause or contribute to such differences in outcomes and results include, but are not limited to, those
discussed below in Item 1A and those set forth in our other periodic filings filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Except as required by law, we do not intend to update any forward-looking statements even if new
information becomes available or other events occur in the future.
Item 1.
Business
Introduction
We were incorporated in Delaware in 1984 and are a leading developer of Wearable technologies and
display products.
On January 16, 2013, we completed the sale of our III-V product line, including all of the outstanding equity
interest in KTC Wireless, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary which held the our investment in Kopin Taiwan
Corporation (KTC), to IQE KC, LLC (IQE) and IQE plc (Parent, and collectively with IQE, the Buyer). Our
III-V products primarily consisted of our Gallium Arsenide-based HBT transistor wafers. The aggregate purchase
price was approximately $75 million, subject to certain adjustments, including working capital adjustments and
escrow. Upon agreement of the final working capital and other adjustments the net purchase price was $70.2
million, and the gain on the sale, net of tax, was $20.1 million. Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, $55
million was paid to us in January 2013, $0.2 million was paid in April 2013 and the remaining $15 million is
scheduled to be paid to us on the third anniversary of the Closing Date. We have revised the prior period amounts
in our consolidated financial statements for the impact of the sale of the III-V product line, which is reflected as
discontinued operations.
The following table provides the pro forma revenues of the Company as if the sale of the III-V product line
had been completed on December 26, 2010 (the first day of the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31,
2011) (in millions):
Consolidated
Revenues . . .
$93.4
2012
III-V
Product
Line
$58.8
Pro
Forma
$34.6
Consolidated
$131.1
2011
III-V
Product
Line
$66.5
Pro
Forma
$64.6
The following table provides the pro forma assets of the Company as if the sale of the III-V product line had
been completed on December 29, 2012 (in millions):
Total Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$176.2
$50.7
$125.5
Consolidated
III-V Product Line
Pro Forma
2012
3
Wearable technologies are used to create hands-free voice and gesture controlled wireless computing and
communication systems primarily worn on the head, which include an optical pod featuring our proprietary
miniature flat panel displays. Wearable technologies integrate a variety of commercially available software
packages such as Microsoft Windows CE, Nuance Dragon NaturallySpeaking and Hillcrest Labs with our
proprietary software and display products to create a reference design which we offer to license to customers who
wish to develop mobile industrial products. We licensed our first reference design known as Golden-i® in 2010
and our customer began shipping products based on our technology in 2013. Through 2013 our revenues from
licensing our Golden-i technologies has been de minimis. We have rebranded the category and refer to the
headset reference designs and other technologies we developed as Kopin Wearable technologies, of which the
Golden-i headset reference design is for the industrial market segment.
Our display products consist of miniature, high performance, high resolution displays either sold separately
or in various configurations with optical lenses and electronics contained in either plastic or metal housings.
Current applications which include our miniature, high performance, high resolution display products are
military devices, such as thermal weapon sights, and consumer devices such as digital cameras; and devices that
are capable of accessing the Internet or digital storage devices for viewing data or video. When our display
products are configured as spatial light modulators, the applications include industrial equipment for 3D
Automated Optical Inspection and training simulation equipment. We have sold our display products to Raytheon
Company, DRS RSTA Inc., BAE Systems (directly and through a third party QiOptiq), and ITT for use in
military applications and to Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Samsung), Eastman Kodak Company (Kodak),
Olympus Corporation (Olympus) and Fuji Corporation (Fuji) for digital still cameras. For fiscal years 2013, 2012
and 2011, significant display customers are shown below. The caption “Military Customers in Total” in the table
below excludes research and development contracts. We sell our displays to Japanese customers through Ryoden
Trading Company. (“*” denotes that the customer’s revenues were less than 10% of our total company
revenues))
Customer
Military Customers in Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Raytheon Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
DRS RSTA Inc.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
QiOptiq Defense Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ryoden Trading Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U. S. Government funded research and development contracts . . . . . .
Percent of Total
Revenues
2013
2012
2011
38% 57% 60%
14% 22% 23%
21% 18%
*
*
10%
*
18% 12% 15%
8%
10% 10%
Our fiscal year ends on the last Saturday in December. The fiscal years ended December 28, 2013,
December 29, 2012, and December 31, 2011 are referred to herein as fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011,
respectively. Our principal executive offices are located at 125 North Drive, Westborough, Massachusetts. Our
telephone number is (508) 870-5959.
Industry Overview
Wearable Computing/Communicating
Over a billion wireless hand-held devices are sold annually for communication, data input, storage and
retrieval, accessing the internet, and other purposes. Derivative wireless devices such as Bluetooth headsets and
Smart Watches are available for the purpose of allowing the user to access their wireless handsets’ voice and text
communication features without holding the wireless handset. Wearable computing devices also include body-
worn devices such as scanners and terminals which are sold in industrial markets to improve worker productivity.
The user interface for these devices is typically either a key pad or a touch screen however some wireless devices
include voice recognition software as an additional feature to allow the user to search the Internet. We believe
wireless handset makers are looking to create products that work as a complement to the wireless handsets or to
4
eventually replace the wireless handset. Wireless network companies are encouraging the development of more
products that utilize their network capacity and other companies are developing products which provide
continuous access to social media outlets. In order for the markets for these new products to develop further
advances in the devices and application software will be required. Device improvements include smaller higher
resolution displays, lower power processors, longer-life batteries, compact optics and software including voice
recognition and noise cancellation. For the market for these devices to grow application software must be
developed that exploit their new features and functions.
Display Products
Small form factor displays are used in military, consumer electronic and industrial products such as thermal
weapon sights, digital cameras, training and simulation products and metrology tools. We expect the market for
wireless communications devices, including personal entertainment systems, will continue to grow. In order for
this market to develop, advances in wireless communications systems such as greater bandwidth and increased
functionality, including real-time wireless data, broadband Internet access and mobile television, will be
necessary. We believe small form factor displays will be a critical component in the development of advanced
mobile wireless communications systems as these systems must provide high resolution images without
compromising the portability of the product.
There are several display technologies commercially available including transmissive, reflective and
emissive. The most commonly used technology in portable applications is based on the traditional liquid crystal
display, or LCD, which is now in widespread use. We offer transmissive and reflective display solutions.These
displays form an image by either transmitting or reflecting light emitted from a source located either behind or in
front of the LCD. The principal LCD technologies are passive and active matrix.
•
•
Passive Matrix LCD. These displays are primarily used in calculators, simple watches and wireless
handsets because of their relatively low cost and low power consumption. Their relatively low image
quality, slow response time and limited viewing angle, however, make them inadequate for many
demanding applications.
Active Matrix LCD. These displays are used primarily in wireless handsets, tablets, laptop computers,
televisions and projection systems. In contrast to passive matrix LCDs, color active matrix LCDs
incorporate three transistors at every pixel location. This arrangement allows each pixel to be turned on
and off independently which improves image quality and response time and also provides an improved
side-to-side viewing angle of the display.
Our Solution
Kopin Wearable Technology
Kopin Wearable technology is a collection of technologies and software which can be integrated to create
headset reference designs which use voice as the user interface and through the use of wireless technologies can
contact other users or information from the cloud. The headset reference designs range from a headset which
resembles typical eyeglasses but include audio capabilities allowing the user to communicate with other users to
our industrial headset reference design, called Golden-i, which includes an optical pod with one of our display
products, a microprocessor, memory and various commercially available software packages that we license such
as Microsoft Windows CE or Android, Nuance Dragon NaturallySpeaking, Ask Ziggy natural speech, and
Hillcrest Labs motion control. All of our headset reference designs utilize operating system software we
developed and include our proprietary noise cancellation technologies. The optical pod allows the user to view
information such as WEB data, technical diagrams, streaming video or face to face communication. When
viewing schematics or similar documents the user is capable of zooming-in to see finer details or zooming out to
see an entire system perspective. Some headset reference designs have a camera feature which enables the user to
stream live video to a remote subject matter expert so that both the user and expert can analyze the issue at the
same time.
5
We believe Kopin’s Wearable technology will provide for increased worker productivity, safety and
improved manufacturing quality through more efficient issue resolution and improved communication. Kopin
Wearable reference designs are targeted for markets where the user needs a much greater range of functionality
than is typically provided by wireless devices such as handsets, smart phones, tablets or Bluetooth headsets and
either due to the requirements of their usage patterns, occupation, or for improved productivity the user is better
served with voice recognition as the primary interface as opposed to a touch screen or keyboard.
Display Products
Our principal Display products are miniature high density color or monochrome active matrix LCDs with
resolutions which range from approximately 320 x 240 resolution to 2048 x 2048 resolution sold in either a
transmissive or reflective format. We sell our displays individually, in an Electronic Viewfinder (EVF) which
includes a single display, backlight and optics in a plastic housing or in a Higher-Level Assembly (HLA) which
contain a display, light emitting diode based illumination, optics, and electronics in a sealed housing. EVFs are
sold to commercial and industrial customers and HLA’s are specifically configured and sold to military
customers.
Our transmissive display products, which we refer to as CyberDisplay™ products, utilize high quality,
single crystal silicon-the same high quality silicon used in conventional integrated circuits. This single crystal
silicon is not grown on glass; rather, it is first formed on a silicon wafer and patterned into an integrated circuit
(including the active matrix, driver circuitry and other logic circuits) in an integrated circuit foundry. The silicon
wafer is then sent to our facilities and the integrated circuit is lifted off as a thin film and transferred to glass
using our proprietary Wafer™ Engineering technology, so that the transferred layer is a fully functional active
matrix integrated circuit which now resides on a transparent substrate.
Our proprietary technology enables the production of transparent circuits on a transparent substrate, in
contrast to conventional silicon circuits, which are on an opaque substrate. Our CyberDisplay products’ imaging
properties are a result of the formation of a liquid crystal layer between the active matrix integrated circuit glass
and the transparent glass. We believe our manufacturing process offers several advantages over conventional
active matrix LCD manufacturing approaches with regard to small form factor displays, including:
•
•
•
•
Greater miniaturization;
Higher pixel density;
Full color capability; and
Lower power consumption.
Our use of high quality single crystal silicon in the manufacture of our CyberDisplay products offers several
performance advantages. The color CyberDisplay displays we sell generate colors by using color filters with a
white backlight. Color filter technology is a process in which display pixels are patterned with materials, which
selectively absorb or transmit the red, green or blue colors of light.
Our CyberDisplay displays have the additional advantage of being fabricated using conventional silicon
integrated circuit lithography processes. These processes enable the manufacture of miniature active matrix
circuits, resulting in comparable or higher resolution displays relative to passive and other active matrix displays
that are fabricated on glass. Our foundry partners fabricate integrated circuits for our CyberDisplay displays in
their foundries in Taiwan and Korea. The fabricated wafers are then returned to our facilities, where we lift the
integrated circuits off the silicon wafers and transfer them to glass using our proprietary technology. The
transferred integrated circuits are then processed, packaged with liquid crystal and assembled into display panels
at our Display Manufacturing Center in Westborough, Massachusetts.
6
For military applications of our CyberDisplay display, it is fabricated, tested and routed to our HLA
assembly area, where it is incorporated into a module. We offer a variety of models with varying levels of
complexity but common to all is our display, illuminations source, optics and electronics in a sealed unit.
Our reflective displays products are miniature high density dual mode color sequential/monochrome
reflective micro displays with resolutions which range from approximately 1280 x 720 pixels (720P) resolution
to 2048 x 1536 pixels (QXGA) resolution. These displays are manufactured at our facility in Scotland, U.K. and
we have also investigated the outsourcing of reflective displays from third party manufacturers. Our reflective
displays are based on a proprietary, very high-speed, ferroelectric liquid crystal on silicon (FLCOS) platform.
Our digital software and logic based drive electronics combined with the very fast switching binary liquid crystal
enables our micro display to process images purely digitally and create red, green and blue gray scale in the time
domain. This architecture has major advantages in visual performance over other liquid crystal, organic light-
emitting diode and MEMS based technologies: precisely controlled full color or monochrome gray scale is
achieved on a matrix of undivided high fill factor pixels, motion artifacts are reduced to an insignificant level and
there are no sub-pixels, no moving mirrors and no analog conversions to detract from the quality of the image.
The FLCOS device is comprised of two substrates. The first is a pixelated silicon-based CMOS substrate
which is manufactured by our foundry partner using conventional silicon integrated circuit lithography processes.
The silicon substrate forms the display’s backplane, serving as both the active matrix to drive individual pixels
and as a reflective mirror. The second substrate is a front glass plate. Between the backplane and the front glass
substrate is the ferroelectric liquid crystal material which, when switched, enables the incoming illumination to
be modulated.
Strategy
Our strategy is to enable our customers to create differentiated products in their respective markets by
offering technology and experience in the critical technology areas such as displays, optics, backlights, software,
noise cancellation, packaging and ergonomics. We have developed several headset reference designs which use
voice and gesture control as the primary interface between the user and the headset. The headset can send and
receive both audio and video over wireless networks which allows for two-way communication with anyone who
has access to similar capabilities. The headset reference designs are run by software that we developed internally
and license from third parties. The video, documents and similar information (for example diagrams) are shown
in an optical pod which is part of the device. The optical pod is comprised of one of our micro display products
and other components (backlight, optical lens and Application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASIC) which are
either made to our specifications or are standard parts that we purchase. Some of the reference designs have a
camera feature which allows the user to send video to a remote third party. Our business model is to license our
reference designs and enter into agreements for the sale of the optical pod or to sell our display and components
separately. We offer our products to developers and manufacturers of industrial products, military products,
consumer electronic products, 3d metrology equipment manufacturers and manufacturers of the next generation
of mobile devices. The critical elements of our strategy include:
•
Broad Portfolio of Intellectual Property. We believe that our extensive portfolio of patents, trade
secrets and non-patented know-how provides us with a competitive advantage in the wearable
computing industry and we have been accumulating, either by internal efforts or through acquisition, a
significant patent and know-how portfolio. We own, exclusively license or have the sole right to
sublicense more than 200 patents issued and pending worldwide. An important piece of our strategy is
to continue to accumulate valuable patented and non-patented technical know-how relating to our
micro display and wearable computing technologies.
• Maintain Our Technological Leadership. We are a recognized leader in the design, development and
manufacture of high resolution micro displays and modules which incorporate our micro displays with
backlights, optic and ASICs and we believe our ability to develop both components and innovative
reference system designs enhances our opportunity to grow within our targeted markets. By continuing
7
•
•
to invest in research and development, we are able to add to our expertise in the design of innovative,
high-resolution, miniature flat panel displays, backlights, optics and ASICs and we intend to continue
to focus our development efforts on proprietary wearable computing systems.
License Headset Reference Designs with Key Product Manufacturers And Or Sell Critical Wearable
Computing System Components. Our strategy to monetize our headset reference designs is to licenses
our technologies and know-how with manufacturers of wireless devices and also sell them critical
components including display, backlights, optics and ASICs products. We may license them an entire
reference design system which includes a license to our patents and know-how, a prototype product
design and software or we may license individual elements of the reference design system. We have
partners who are interested in developing their own devices which include the use of a micro display,
backlights, optics and ASICs. In such cases we will offer these items for sale as standalone
components. By licensing our reference designs our customers can significantly reduce time to market
and, for certain components, obtain valid rights to use our intellectual property.
Strong U.S. Government Program Support. We perform a significant amount of work under research
and development contracts with U.S. government agencies, such as the U.S. Night Vision Laboratory
and the U.S. Department of Defense. Under these contracts, the U.S. Government funds a portion of
our efforts to develop next-generation micro display related technologies. This enables us to
supplement our internal research and development budget with additional funding.
Markets and Customers
Wearable computing products
Our business model is to generate revenues by licensing, for a royalty fee, our reference designs and know-
how, which includes the operating software and patented product designs, and selling components to customers
who develop and manufacture, or distribute, products based on our technology. We may also receive
development fees from customers to help them integrate our technology into their products.
In 2010 we entered into an agreement with a company to license our Golden-i technology, which is our
industrial headset reference design. The agreement gave the company an exclusive license in certain industrial
fields, a non-exclusive in other fields and prohibits them from offering products in certain fields. Our revenues in
2013 from the license of the Golden-i headset reference design were not significant.
Display Products
We currently sell our display products to our customers as either a single display component, a unit which
includes a lens and backlight (referred to as an electronic view finder or EVF), or a complete module, which
includes the display, lens, backlight, focus mechanism and electronics, which are assembled in a plastic or metal
housing (referred to as higher level assemblies or HLA for military customers and optical pod for commercial
customers). We provide our display products to our customer for use in their product, which is based on our
Golden-i reference design, Olympus, Fuji and Sanyo for use in digital cameras and to U.S. military prime
contractors and certain foreign governments for use in military applications.
In order for our display products to function properly in their intended applications, ASICs generally are
required. Several companies have designed ASICs to work with our display products and our customers can
procure these chip sets directly from the manufacturer or through us.
For fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011, sales to military customers, excluding research and development
contracts, as a percentage of total revenue were 38%, 57% and 60%, respectively.
For fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011, research and development revenues, primarily from multiple contracts
with various U.S. governmental agencies, accounted for approximately 10%, 10% and 8%, respectively, of our
total revenues.
8
For additional information with respect to our operating segments including sales and geographical
information, see Note 15 to our financial statements for the year ended December 28, 2013, included with this
Form 10-K.
Sales and Marketing
Our strategy is to license our headset reference designs to customers who will develop end user products.
Our reference designs are still in the development stage and our marketing strategy has been primarily focused
on establishing partnerships with leading companies in specific markets in order to understand their product
requirements.
We sell our consumer electronic display products both directly and through distributors to original
equipment manufacturers. We sell our military display products directly to prime contractors of the U.S.
government or to foreign companies. Our strategy is to license our Kopin Wearable technology to customers who
will develop end user products. For our display products we have a few customers who purchase in large
volumes and many customers who buy in small volumes as part of their product development efforts. “Large
volume” is a relative term. For consumer display customers, purchases may be in the tens of thousands per week,
whereas industrial and military customers may purchase less than a hundred per month.
We believe that the technical nature of our products and markets demands a commitment to close
relationships with our customers. Our sales and marketing staff, assisted by our technical staff and senior
management, visit prospective and existing customers worldwide on a regular basis. We believe these contacts
are vital to the development of a close, long-term working relationship with our customers, and in obtaining
regular forecasts, market updates and information regarding technical and market trends. We also participate in
industry specific trade shows and conferences.
Our design and engineering staff are actively involved with customers during all phases of prototype design
and production by providing engineering data, up-to-date product application notes, regular follow-up and
technical assistance. In most cases, our technical staff work with each customer in the development stage to
identify potential improvements to the design of the customer’s product in parallel with the customer’s effort. We
have established a prototype product design group in Scotts Valley, California to assist our military product
customers, and in Santa Clara, California to assist our wearable product customers. These groups assist
customers with incorporating our technologies and products into our customer’s products and to accelerate the
design process, achieving cost-effective and manufacturable products, and ensuring a smooth transition into high
volume production. Our group in Scotts Valley is also actively involved with research and development contracts
for military applications.
Product Development
We believe that continued introduction of new products in our target markets is essential to our growth. Our
commercial products tend to have one to three year life cycles. We have assembled a group of highly skilled
engineers who work internally as well as with our customers to continue our product development efforts. For the
headset reference designs we develop software using both internal and external resources. For fiscal years 2013,
2012, and 2011 we incurred total research and development expenses of $17.5 million, $14.3 million and $16.6
million, respectively.
Component Products
Our display product development efforts are focused towards continually enhancing the resolution,
performance and manufacturability of our display products. A principal focus of this effort is the improvement of
manufacturing processes for very small active matrix pixels with our eight inch manufacturing line, which we
will use in succeeding generations of our display products. The pixel size of our current transmissive display
9
products ranges from 6.8 to 15 microns. These pixel sizes are much smaller than a pixel size of approximately
100 microns in a typical laptop computer display. The resolutions of our current commercially available display
products are 320 x 240, 432 x 240, 640 x 480, 854 x 480, 800 x 600, 1,024 x 768, 1,280 x 1,024 and 2,048 x
1,536 pixels. In addition, we have demonstrated 2,048 x 2,048 resolution displays in a 0.96-inch diagonal size.
We are also working on further decreasing the power consumption of our display products. The pixel size of our
current reflective display products ranges from 8.2 to 13.6 microns. The resolutions of our current commercially
available reflective display products are 1,024 x 768 and 1,280 x 1,024 pixels. Additional display development
efforts include expanding the resolutions offered, increasing the quantity of display active matrix pixel arrays
processed on each wafer by further reducing the display size, increasing the light throughput of our pixels,
increasing manufacturing yields, and increasing the functionality of our HLA products.
We offer components such as optical lenses, back lights and ASICs that we have made to our specifications
or are standard items that we buy and resell. The components that are made to order include either intellectual
property we developed or licensed from third parties.
Headset Reference Design Products
Our headset reference design efforts are primarily focused on operating, application and noise cancellation
software development, improving the optics in the display pod and reducing the size and power consumption of
the unit and improving the overall fit and fashion of the reference design.
Funded Research and Development
We have entered into various development contracts with agencies and prime contractors of the U.S.
government. These contracts help support the continued development of our core technologies. We intend to
continue to pursue U.S. government development contracts for applications that relate to our commercial and
military product applications. Our contracts with U.S. government agencies and prime contractors to the U.S.
government contain certain milestones relating to technology development and may be terminated by the
government agencies prior to completion of funding. Our policy is to retain our proprietary rights with respect to
the principal commercial applications of our technology. To the extent technology development has been funded
by a U.S. federal agency, under applicable U.S. federal laws the federal agency has the right to obtain a non-
exclusive, non-transferable, irrevocable, fully paid license to practice or have practiced this technology for
governmental use. Revenues attributable to research and development contracts for fiscal years 2013, 2012 and
2011 totaled $2.3 million, $3.3 million and $5.1 million, respectively.
Competition
Component Products
The commercial display market is highly competitive and is currently dominated by large Asian-based
electronics companies including AUO, Himax, LG Display, Samsung, Sharp, Seiko, and Sony. The display
market consists of multiple segments, each focusing on different end-user applications applying different
technologies. Competition in the display field is based on price and performance characteristics, product quality
and the ability to deliver products in a timely fashion. The success of our display product offerings will also
depend upon the adoption of our display products by consumers as an alternative to traditional active matrix
LCDs and upon our ability to compete against other types of well-established display products and new emerging
display products. Particularly significant is the consumer’s willingness to use a near eye display device, as
opposed to a direct view display which may be viewed from a distance of several inches to several feet. We
cannot be certain that we will be able to compete against these companies and technologies, or that the consumer
will accept the use of such eyewear in general or our form factor specifically.
There are also a number of active matrix LCD and alternative display technologies in development and
production. These technologies include plasma, organic light emitting diode (OLEDs) and virtual retinal
10
displays, some of which target the high performance small form factor display markets in which our military
display products are sold. There are many large and small companies that manufacture or have in development
products based on these technologies. Our display products will compete with other displays utilizing these and
other competing display technologies.
There are many companies whose sole business is the development and manufacture of optical lenses,
backlights, ASICs and software. These companies may have significantly more intellectual property and
experience than we do in the design and development of these components. We do not manufacture optical
lenses, backlights, or ASICs but we either have them made to our specifications or buy standard off-the-shelf
products
Headset Reference Design Products
The markets our headset reference designs are targeted to currently use smartphones, laptop computers,
personal computers, tablets, ruggedized portable computers referred to as “tough books”, and a variety of hand-
held devices. This market is extremely competitive and is served by companies such as Panasonic, Toshiba, Dell,
HTC, Hewlett Packard, Apple, Sony and Samsung. These companies are substantially larger than Kopin from
revenue, cash flow and asset perspectives. In addition, Google has developed a device named Google Glass
which is a headset product with similar form and function as our headsets. Google is substantially larger than
Kopin from revenue, cash flow and asset perspectives.
Patents, Proprietary Rights and Licenses
An important part of our product development strategy is to seek, when appropriate, protection for our
products and proprietary technology through the use of various United States and foreign patents and contractual
arrangements. We intend to prosecute and defend our proprietary technology aggressively. Many of our United
States patents and applications have counterpart foreign patents, foreign applications or international applications
through the Patent Cooperation Treaty. In addition, we have licensed United States patents and some foreign
counterparts to these United States patents from MIT.
The process of seeking patent protection can be time consuming and expensive and we cannot be certain
that patents will be issued from currently pending or future applications or that our existing patents or any new
patents that may be issued will be sufficient in scope or strength to provide meaningful protection or any
commercial advantage to us. We may be subject to or may initiate interference proceedings in the United States
Patent and Trademark Office, which can demand significant financial and management resources. Patent
applications in the United States typically are maintained in secrecy until they are published about eighteen
months after their earliest claim to priority and since publication of discoveries in the scientific and patent
literature lags behind actual discoveries, we cannot be certain that we were the first to conceive of inventions
covered by pending patent applications or the first to file patent applications on such inventions. We cannot be
certain that our pending patent applications or those of our licensor’s will result in issued patents or that any
issued patents will afford protection against a competitor. In addition, we cannot be certain that others will not
obtain patents that we would need to license, circumvent or cease manufacturing and sales of products covered
by these patents, nor can we be sure that licenses, if needed, would be available to us on favorable terms, if at all.
We cannot be certain that foreign intellectual property laws will protect our intellectual property rights or
that others will not independently develop similar products, duplicate our products or design around any patents
issued or licensed to us. Our products might infringe the patent rights of others, whether existing now or in the
future. For the same reasons, the products of others could infringe our patent rights. We may be notified, from
time to time, that we could be or we are infringing certain patents and other intellectual property rights of others.
Litigation, which could be very costly and lead to substantial diversion of our resources, even if the outcome is
favorable, may be necessary to enforce our patents or other intellectual property rights or to defend us against
claimed infringement of the rights of others. These problems can be particularly severe in foreign countries. In
11
the event of an adverse ruling in litigation against us for patent infringement, we might be required to discontinue
the use of certain processes, cease the manufacture, use and sale of infringing products, expend significant
resources to develop non-infringing technology or obtain licenses to patents of third parties covering the
infringing technology. We cannot be certain that licenses will be obtainable on acceptable terms, if at all, or that
damages for infringement will not be assessed or that litigation will not occur. The failure to obtain necessary
licenses or other rights or litigation arising out of any such claims could adversely affect our ability to conduct
our business as we presently conduct it.
We also attempt to protect our proprietary information with contractual arrangements and under trade secret
laws. We believe that our future success will depend primarily upon the technical expertise, creative skills and
management abilities of our officers and key employees rather than on patent ownership. Our employees and
consultants generally enter into agreements containing provisions with respect to confidentiality and employees
generally assign rights to us for inventions made by them while in our employ. Agreements with consultants
generally provide that rights to inventions made by them while consulting for us will be assigned to us unless the
assignment of rights is prohibited by the terms of any agreements with their regular employers. Agreements with
employees, consultants and collaborators contain provisions intended to further protect the confidentiality of our
proprietary information. To date, we have had no experience in enforcing these agreements. We cannot be certain
that these agreements will not be breached or that we would have adequate remedies for any breaches. Our trade
secrets may not be secure from discovery or independent development by competitors.
Government Regulations
We are subject to a variety of federal, state and local governmental regulations related to the use, storage,
discharge and disposal of toxic, volatile or otherwise hazardous chemicals used in our manufacturing process.
The failure to comply with present or future regulations could result in fines being imposed on us, suspension of
production or cessation of operations. Any failure on our part to control the use of, or adequately restrict the
discharge of, hazardous substances, or otherwise comply with environmental regulations, could subject us to
significant future liabilities. In addition, we cannot be certain that we have not in the past violated applicable
laws or regulations, which violations could result in required remediation or other liabilities. We also cannot be
certain that past use or disposal of environmentally sensitive materials in conformity with then existing
environmental laws and regulations will protect us from required remediation or other liabilities under current or
future environmental laws or regulations.
We are also subject to federal International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) laws which regulate the
export of technical data and sale of products to other nations which may use these products for military purposes.
The failure to comply with present or future regulations could result in fines being imposed on us, suspension of
production, or a cessation of operations. Any failure on our part to control the use of, or adequately restrict the
discharge of, hazardous substances, or otherwise comply with environmental regulations, could subject us to
significant future liabilities. Any failure on our part to obtain any required licenses for the export of technical
data and/or sales of our products or to otherwise comply with ITAR, could subject us to significant future
liabilities. In addition, we cannot be certain that we have not in the past violated applicable laws or regulations,
which violations could result in required remediation or other liabilities.
We are also subject to federal importation laws which regulate the importation of raw materials and
equipment from other nations which are used in our products. The failure to comply with present or future
regulations could result in fines being imposed on us, suspension of production, or a cessation of operations.
Investments in Related Businesses
We own 100% of the outstanding common stock of Forth Dimension Displays Ltd. (FDD) and we
consolidate the financial results of FDD within our consolidated financial statements.
12
In 2013, we increased our ownership of Kowon Technology Co. LTD (Kowon) from 78% to 93% by
purchasing stock from the minority stockholders for $3.7 million as part of a plan to cease Kowon’s operations.
We closed Kowon’s manufacturing operations in 2013.
In April 2013, the Company acquired 51% of the outstanding stock of eMDT America, Inc. (eMDT), a
private company, for $400,000 and began consolidating eMDT, Inc into our financial statements in April of that
year.
We own 58% of Ikanos Consulting, Ltd. (Ikanos), a private company, located in the United Kingdom. We
acquired our interest in Ikanos through two equity purchases in 2012 which totaled $3.2 million. We began
consolidating Ikanos into our financial statements on July 1, 2012.
We have a 12% interest in KoBrite, and are accounting for our ownership interest using the equity method.
We recorded equity losses from our investment in KoBrite of $0.4 million, $0.6 million and $0.3 million in fiscal
years 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
We have a 23% interest in Ask Ziggy which we accounted for under the equity method. As of year ended
December 28, 2013 we determined the investment was impaired and we wrote it down to $0.
On January 16, 2013, we completed the sale of our III-V product line, including our approximate 90%
interest in Kopin Taiwan Corp (KTC). Previously we owned approximately 90% of KTC and consolidated the
financial statements of KTC as part of our financial statements. The buyer renamed KTC to IQE Taiwan. One of
our Directors is a chairman of IQE Taiwan and owns approximately 1% of the outstanding common stock of IQE
Taiwan.
We may from time to time make further equity investments in these and other companies engaged in certain
aspects of the display, electronics, optical and software industries as part of our business strategy. In addition the
wearable computing product market is new and there may be other technologies we need to invest in to enhance
our product offering. These investments may not provide us with any financial return or other benefit and any
losses by these companies or associated losses in our investments may negatively impact our operating results.
Certain of our officers and directors have invested in some of the companies we have invested in.
Employees
As of December 28, 2013, our consolidated business employed 179 full-time and 1 part-time individuals. Of
these, 10 hold Ph.D. degrees in Material Science, Electrical Engineering or Physics. Our management and
professional employees have significant prior experience in semiconductor materials, device transistor and
display processing, manufacturing and other related technologies. However, our employees are located in the
U.S., Europe and Asia and the laws regarding employee relationships are different by jurisdiction. None of our
employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We consider relations with our employees to be
good.
Sources and Availability of Raw Materials and Components
We rely on third party independent contractors for certain integrated circuit chip sets and other critical raw
materials such as special glasses and chemicals. In addition, our higher-level CyberDisplay assemblies, binocular
display module, and other modules include lenses, backlights, printed circuit boards and other components,
which we purchase from third party suppliers. Some of these third party contractors and suppliers are small
companies with limited financial resources. In addition, relative to the commercial market, the military buys a
small number of units which prevents us from qualifying and buying components economically from multiple
vendors. As a result, we are highly dependent on a select number of third party contractors and suppliers.
13
In addition, we also are subject to rules promulgated by the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) in 2012
pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 that require us to conduct
due diligence on and disclose if we are able to determine whether certain materials (including tantalum, tin, gold
and tungsten), known as conflict minerals, that originate from mines in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or
certain adjoining countries (DRC), are used in our products. The first DRC minerals report is due in the second
quarter of 2014 for the 2013 calendar year and we are conducting appropriate diligence measures to comply with
such requirements.
Web Availability
We make available free of charge through our website, www.kopin.com, our annual reports on Form 10-K
and other reports that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, as well as certain of our corporate
governance policies, including the charters for the Board of Directors’ audit, compensation and nominating and
corporate governance committees and our code of ethics, corporate governance guidelines and whistleblower
policy. We will also provide to any person without charge, upon request, a copy of any of the foregoing
materials. Any such request must be made in writing to us, c/o Investor Relations, Kopin Corporation, 125 North
Drive, Westborough MA, 01581.
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The following sets forth certain information with regard to our executive officers as of March 7, 2014 (ages
are as of December 28, 2013):
John C.C. Fan, age 70
Bor-Yeu Tsaur, age 58
•
•
President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman
Founded Kopin in 1984
•
•
Executive Vice President—Display
Operations
Joined Kopin in 1997
Richard A. Sneider, age 53
Michael Presz, age 60
•
•
Vice President—Government Programs
and Special Projects
Joined Kopin in 1994
•
•
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Joined Kopin in 1998
Hong Choi, age 62
•
•
Vice President and Chief Technology
Officer
Joined Kopin in 2000
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The global economy in general and the United States economy specifically are experiencing a historic
period of uncertainty which could impact our financial results and stock price, among other things. The United
States economy is experiencing high levels of unemployment as compared to historic levels, large federal budget
deficits and anticipated declining expenditures on military programs. These issues could have a severe adverse
effect on our business and results of operation.
We have experienced a history of losses and have a significant accumulated deficit. Since inception, we
have incurred significant net operating losses. In January 2013 we sold our III-V product line including our 90%
interest in Kopin Taiwan Corporation (KTC). Our III-V product line accounted for 62.9%, and 50.7% of our
fiscal year 2012 and 2011 revenues, respectively. As of December 28, 2013, we have an accumulated deficit of
14
$148 million. We believe that our products are targeted towards markets that are still developing and our
competitive strength is creating new technologies. Accordingly we believe it is important to continue to invest in
research and development even during periods when we are not profitable. Our philosophy and strategies may
result in our incurring losses from operations and negative cash flow.
The market segment for our wearable computing products may not develop or may take longer to develop
than we anticipate which may impact our ability to grow revenues. We have developed head-worn, voice and
gesture controlled, hands-free cloud computing headset reference designs which we intend to license to
customers. We also plan to sell our micro display and other components either as part of the license arrangement
or as standalone products. We refer to our headset reference designs and components as our wearable computing
products. Our success will in large part depend on the widespread adoption of the headset format. Customers may
determine that the headset is not comfortable, weighs too much or the size and format of the display is too small.
If a market for our wearable computing products does not develop we may be unable to grow our revenues which
will adversely affect our expectation of our future revenue and results of operations. In January 2013, we sold our
III-V product line including our 90% interest in Kopin Taiwan Corporation (KTC). Our III-V product line
accounted for $58.8 million or 62.9% of our fiscal year 2012 revenues. As a result of the sale of our III-V
product line, our success in commercializing our wearable computing products is very important in our ability to
achieve positive cash flow and profitability. If we are unable to commercialize our wearable computing products
we may not be able to increase revenues, achieve profitability or positive cash flow.
Our headset reference design is dependent on software which we have limited experience in developing,
marketing or licensing. Our headset reference designs include a combination of commercially available
software, such as Microsoft Windows CE and Android, voice activated software technologies, such as Nuance
Dragon NaturallySpeaking, and operating and speech enhancement software that we internally developed or
acquired. We have little experience in developing, marketing or licensing software. If we are unable to integrate
internally developed and or acquired software in our headset reference designs we may not be able to license the
designs. The market demand for our headset reference designs or the products our customers may develop based
on our reference designs is dependent on our ability to collaborate with software developers who write
application software (“apps”) in order to create utility in our customer’s products. If we are unable to develop,
license or acquire software or we are unable to create a sufficient body of application software our reference
designs may not be accepted by the market and we may not be able to increase revenues, achieve profitability or
positive cash flow.
The markets in which we operate are highly competitive and rapidly changing and we may be unable to
compete successfully. There are a number of companies that develop or may develop products that compete in
our targeted markets. The individual components that we offer for sale (display, optical lenses, backlights and
ASICs) are also offered by companies who’s sole business is the individual component. For example, there are
many companies whose sole business is to sell optical lenses. Accordingly, our strategy requires us to develop
technologies and to compete in multiple markets. Some of our competitors are much larger than we are and have
significantly greater financial, development and marketing resources than we do. The competition in these
markets could adversely affect our operating results by reducing the volume of the products we sell or the prices
we can charge. These competitors may be able to respond more rapidly than we can to new or emerging
technologies or changes in customer requirements. They may also devote greater resources to the development,
promotion and sale of their products than we do.
Our success will depend substantially upon our ability to enhance our products and technologies and to
develop and introduce, on a timely and cost-effective basis, new products and features that meet changing
customer requirements and incorporate technological enhancements. If we are unable to develop new products
and enhance functionalities or technologies to adapt to these changes, or if we are unable to realize synergies
among our acquired products and technologies, our business will suffer.
15
The market for cloud-based applications may develop more slowly than we expect. Our success will
depend, to some extent, on the willingness of businesses to accept cloud-based services for applications that they
view as critical to the success of their business. Many companies have invested substantial effort and financial
resources to integrate traditional enterprise software into their businesses and may be reluctant or unwilling to
switch to a different application or to migrate these applications to cloud-based services. Other factors that may
affect market acceptance of our application include:
•
•
•
•
the security capabilities, reliability and availability of cloud-based services;
our ability to implement upgrades and other changes to our software without disrupting our service;
the level of customization or configuration we offer; and
the price, performance and availability of competing products and services.
The market for these services may not develop further, or may develop more slowly than we expect, either
of which would negatively affect our ability to grow revenues, achieve profitability and generate positive cash
flow.
We may not be successful in protecting our intellectual property and proprietary rights and we may incur
substantial costs in defending our intellectual property. Our success depends in part on our ability to protect
our intellectual property and proprietary rights. We have obtained certain domestic and foreign patents and we
intend to continue to seek patents on our inventions when appropriate. We also attempt to protect our proprietary
information with contractual arrangements and under trade secret laws. Our employees and consultants generally
enter into agreements containing provisions with respect to confidentiality and the assignment of rights to
inventions made by them while in our employ. These measures may not adequately protect our intellectual and
proprietary rights. Existing trade secret, trademark and copyright laws afford only limited protection and our
patents could be invalidated or circumvented. Moreover, the laws of certain foreign countries in which our
products are or may be manufactured or sold may not fully protect our intellectual property rights.
Misappropriation of our technology and the costs of defending our intellectual property rights from
misappropriation could substantially impair our business. If we are unable to protect our intellectual property and
proprietary rights, our business may not be successful and the value of investors’ investment in us may decline.
Our products could infringe on the intellectual property rights of others. Companies in software
generation and the display industries steadfastly pursue and protect intellectual property rights. This has resulted
in considerable and costly litigation to determine the validity of patents and claims by third parties of
infringement of patents or other intellectual property. Our products could be found to infringe on the intellectual
property rights of others. Other companies may hold or obtain patents or inventions or other proprietary rights in
technology necessary for our business. Periodically companies inquire about our products and technology in their
attempts to assess whether we violate their intellectual property rights. If we are forced to defend against
infringement claims, we may face costly litigation, diversion of technical and management personnel, and
product shipment delays, even if the allegations of infringement are unwarranted. If there is a successful claim of
infringement against us and we are unable to develop non-infringing technology or license the infringed or
similar technology on a timely basis, or if we are required to cease using one or more of our business or product
names due to a successful trademark infringement claim against us, our business could be adversely affected.
We license intellectual property rights of others.
Included in our headset reference designs are
commercially available software which we license from other companies. Should we violate the terms of a
license this could result in our license being canceled. The companies may decide to stop supporting the software
we license or new versions of the software may not be compatible with our software which would require us to
rewrite our software which we may not be able to do. The license fees we pay may be increased which would
negatively affect our ability to achieve profitability and positive cash flow. If we are unable to obtain and or
maintain existing software license relationships our ability to grow revenue and achieve profitability and positive
cash flow may be negative affected.
16
Our headset reference design uses software that we license from other companies (Licensors) and requires
us to access the Licensor’s data centers and interruptions or delays in service from data center hosting facilities
could impair our customer’s products. Any damage to, or failure of, the systems of our Licensors generally
could result in interruptions in service to our customers. Interruptions in service to our customers may reduce our
revenue, cause us to issue credits or pay penalties, cause customers to terminate their contracts and reduce our
ability to attract new customers.
Our revenues and cash flows could be negatively affected if sales of our Display products for military
applications significantly decline. A significant portion of our fiscal year 2014 revenues and cash flow are
expected to come from sales of military products. The U.S. federal government has incurred and is expected to
continue to incur large federal budget deficits and the U.S. federal government has stated its intention to reduce
spending on military programs. Accordingly our ability to generate revenues and cash flow from sales to the U.S.
military is dependent on our displays being qualified in new U.S. military programs and the U.S. military funding
these new programs. If we are unable to be qualified into new U.S. military programs or these programs are not
funded our ability to generate revenues, achieve profitability and positive cash flow will be negatively impacted.
Disruptions of our production of our Display products would adversely affect our operating results.
If we
were to experience any significant disruption in the operation of our facilities, we would be unable to supply our
display products to our customers. In the past, we experienced several power outages at our facilities which
ranged in duration from one to four days. Additionally, as we introduce new equipment into our manufacturing
processes, our display products could be subject to especially wide variations in manufacturing yields and
efficiency. We may experience manufacturing problems that would result in delays in product introduction and
delivery or yield fluctuations. We are also subject to the risks associated with the shortage of raw materials used
in the manufacture of our products.
Our ability to manufacture and distribute our Display products would be severely limited if the foundries
that we rely on to manufacture integrated circuits for our Display products fail to provide those services. We
depend on a Taiwanese foundry and a Korean foundry for the fabrication of integrated circuits for our display
products. We have no long-term contracts with either of these two companies. These two companies use different
methods to manufacture the integrated circuits and a shortage at one company cannot necessarily be supplied by
the other company. One of the companies entered and exited bankruptcy in 2009. If either company were to
terminate its arrangement with us or become unable to provide the required capacity and quality on a timely
basis, we may not be able to manufacture and ship our display products or we may be forced to manufacture
them in limited quantities until replacement foundry services can be obtained. Furthermore, we cannot assure
investors that we would be able to establish alternative manufacturing and packaging relationships on acceptable
terms.
Our reliance on these foundries involves certain risks, including but not limited to:
•
•
•
•
Lack of control over production capacity and delivery schedules;
Limited control over quality assurance, manufacturing yields and production costs;
The risks associated with international commerce, including unexpected changes in legal and
regulatory requirements, changes in tariffs and trade policies and political and economic instability;
and
Natural disasters such as earthquakes, tsunami, mudslides, drought, hurricanes and tornadoes.
Due to natural disasters such as earthquakes and typhoons that have occasionally occurred in Taiwan, many
Taiwanese companies, including the Taiwanese foundry we use, have experienced related business interruptions.
Our business could suffer significantly if either of the foundries we use had operations which were disrupted for
an extended period of time, due to natural disaster, political unrest or financial instability. In addition, our display
products are manufactured on 6-inch and 8-inch silicon wafers. We currently do not anticipate redesigning all of
17
our displays made on 6-inch wafers so they can be manufactured on 8-inch wafers. Our current military products
are primarily manufactured on 6-inch wafers. We cannot be assured that, if either the 6-inch or 8-inch
manufacturing facilities we use were damaged, they would be restored, or that our foundry service providers will
not discontinue the operation of their 6-inch manufacturing lines. If the 6-inch manufacturing lines were
discontinued and the displays had to be redesigned we may need to have the displays re-qualified by our
customers, which would adversely affect our business until such qualification is complete.
We depend on third parties to provide integrated circuit chip sets and other critical raw materials for use
with our headset reference design and display products. We do not manufacture the integrated circuit chip sets
which are used to electronically interface between our display products and our customer’s products. Instead, we
rely on third party independent contractors for these integrated circuit chip sets and other critical raw materials
such as special glasses and chemicals. The critical raw materials, including the glasses and chemicals used in
manufacturing our display products and other components are used by other display manufacturers, many of
which are much larger than us. In addition, our higher-level display assemblies, and other modules include
lenses, backlights, printed circuit boards and other components, which we purchase from third party suppliers.
Some of these third party contractors and suppliers are small companies with limited financial resources. In
addition, relative to the commercial market, the military buys a small number of units which prevents us from
qualifying and buying components economically from multiple vendors. If any of these third party contractors or
suppliers were unable or unwilling to supply these integrated circuit chip sets or other critical raw materials to us,
we would be unable to manufacture and sell our display products until a replacement supplier could be found.
The U.S. military is expected to reduce its purchases which may result in lower demand for our products. Lower
volume purchases may make it uneconomical for some of our suppliers to provide raw materials we need. We
cannot assure investors that a replacement third party contractor or supplier could be found on reasonable terms
or in a timely manner. Any interruption in our ability to manufacture and distribute our display products could
cause our display business to be unsuccessful and the value of investors’ investment in us may decline.
Our business could suffer if we lose the services of, or fail to attract, key personnel.
In order to continue to
provide quality products in our rapidly changing business, we believe it is important to retain personnel with
experience and expertise relevant to our business. Our success depends in large part upon a number of key
management and technical employees. The loss of the services of one or more key employees, including
Dr. John C.C. Fan, our President and Chief Executive Officer, could seriously impede our success. We do not
maintain any “key-man” insurance policies on Dr. Fan or any other employees. In addition, due to the level of
technical and marketing expertise necessary to support our existing and new customers, our success will depend
upon our ability to attract and retain highly skilled management, technical, and sales and marketing personnel.
Competition for highly skilled personnel is intense and there may be only a limited number of persons with the
requisite skills to serve in these positions. If the display markets experience an upturn, we may need to increase
our workforce. Due to the competitive nature of the labor markets in which we operate, we may be unsuccessful
in attracting and retaining these personnel. Our inability to attract and retain key personnel could adversely affect
our ability to develop and manufacture our products.
Our customers who purchase display products for military applications typically incorporate our products
into their products which are sold to the U.S. government under contracts. U.S. government contracts generally
are not fully funded at inception and may be terminated or modified prior to completion, which could adversely
affect our business. Congress funds the vast majority of the federal budget on an annual basis, and Congress
often does not provide agencies with all the money requested in their budget. Many of our customers’ contracts
cover multiple years and, as such, are not fully funded at contract award. If Congress or a U.S. government
agency chooses to spend money on other programs, our customer contracts may be terminated for convenience.
Federal laws, collectively called the Anti-Deficiency Act, prohibit involving the government in any obligation to
pay money before funds have been appropriated for that purpose, unless otherwise allowed by law. Therefore, the
Anti-Deficiency Act indirectly regulates how the agency awards our contracts and pays our invoices. Federal
government contracts generally contain provisions, and are subject to laws and regulations, that provide the
federal government rights and remedies not typically found in commercial contracts, including provisions
18
permitting the federal government to, among other provisions: terminate our existing contracts; modify some of
the terms and conditions in our existing contracts; subject the award to protest or challenge by competitors;
suspend work under existing multiple year contracts and related delivery orders; and claim rights in technologies
and systems invented, developed or produced by us.
The federal government may terminate a contract with us or our customer either “for convenience” (for
instance, due to a change in its perceived needs) or if we default due to our failure or the failure of a
subcontractor to perform under the contract. If the federal government terminates a contract with our customer
our contract with our customers generally would entitle us to recover only our incurred or committed costs,
settlement expenses and profit on the work completed prior to termination. However, under certain
circumstances, our recovery costs upon termination for convenience of such a contract may be limited. As is
common with government contractors, we have experienced occasional performance issues under some of our
contracts. We may in the future receive show-cause or cure notices under contracts that, if not addressed to the
federal government’s satisfaction, could give the government the right to terminate those contracts for default or
to cease procuring our services under those contracts.
In addition, U.S. government contracts and subcontracts typically involve long purchase and payment
cycles, competitive bidding, qualification requirements, delays or changes in funding, extensive specification and
performance requirements, price negotiations and milestone requirements. Each U.S. government agency often
also maintains its own rules and regulations with which we must comply and which can vary significantly among
agencies.
Most of our military sales are on a fixed-price basis, which could subject us to losses if there are cost
overruns. Under a fixed-price contract, we receive only the amount indicated in the contract, regardless of the
actual cost to produce the goods. While firm fixed-price contracts allow us to benefit from potential cost savings,
they also expose us to the risk of cost overruns. If the initial estimates that we use to calculate the sales price and the
cost to perform the work prove to be incorrect, we could incur losses. In addition, some of our contracts have
specific provisions relating to cost, scheduling, and performance. If we fail to meet the terms specified in those
contracts, then our cost to perform the work could increase, which would adversely affect our financial position and
results of operations. Some of the contracts we bid on have “Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity” or IDIQ
provisions. This means we are bidding a fixed price but are not assured of the quantity the government will buy or
when it will buy during the term of the contract. This means we are exposed to the risk of price increases for labor,
overhead and raw materials during the term of the contract. We may incur losses on fixed-price and IDIQ contracts
that we had expected to be profitable, or such contracts may be less profitable than expected, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
We generally do not have long-term contracts with our customers, which makes forecasting our revenues
and operating results difficult. We generally do not enter into long-term agreements with our commercial
display customers obligating them to purchase our products. Our business is characterized by short-term
purchase orders and shipment schedules and we generally permit orders to be canceled or rescheduled before
shipment without significant penalty. As a result, our customers may cease purchasing our products at any time,
which makes forecasting our revenues difficult. In addition, due to the absence of substantial non-cancelable
backlog, we typically plan our production and inventory levels based on internal forecasts of customer demand,
which are highly unpredictable and can fluctuate substantially. Our operating results are difficult to forecast
because we are continuing to invest in capital equipment and increasing our operating expenses for new product
development. If we fail to accurately forecast our revenues and operating results, our business may not be
successful and the value of investors’ investment in us may decline.
If we fail to keep pace with changing technologies, we may lose customers. Rapidly changing customer
requirements, evolving technologies and industry standards characterize the display industries. To achieve our
goals, we need to enhance our existing products and develop and market new products that keep pace with
continuing changes in industry standards, requirements and customer preferences. If we cannot keep pace with
these changes, our business could suffer.
19
If our security systems are penetrated and confidential and or proprietary information were taken we could
be subject to fines, law suits and loss of customers. We rely on our electronic information systems to perform
the routine transactions to run our business. We transact business over the Internet with customers, vendors and
our subsidiaries. We have implemented security measures to protect unauthorized access to this information. We
have also implemented security policies which limit access via the Internet from the company to the outside
world based on the individual’s position in the company. We routinely receive security patches for the software
we use from the software providers. Our primary concerns are inappropriate access to personnel information,
information covered under the International Traffic in Arms Regulation, product designs and manufacturing
information, financial information and our intellectual property, trade secrets and know-how. If our security
systems are penetrated and confidential and or proprietary information were taken we could be subject to fines,
lawsuits and loss of customers.
We may have to record additional intangible assets and/or goodwill impairment losses.
In fiscal year 2013
we recorded intangible asset impairment charges of $1.5 million related to our acquisitions of Ikanos and Forth
Dimension Displays (FDD). In fiscal year 2011 we recorded intangible asset impairment charges of $2.0 million
related to our acquisition of FDD. In 2012 and 2011 we recorded goodwill impairment charges of $1.7 million
and $3.0 million, respectively, related to our acquisition of FDD. During 2013 we recorded $0.4 million of
goodwill related to our acquisition of eMDT, Inc. and in 2012, we recorded $0.7 million of goodwill and $0.6
million in intangible assets related to Ikanos. We may have to record additional intangible asset or goodwill write
downs if Forth Dimension Displays does not achieve the operating results we expect, which will negatively affect
our financial results.
A disruption to our information technology systems could significantly impact our operations and impact
our revenue and profitability. We maintain proprietary data processing systems and use customized software
systems. We also use software packages which are no longer supported by their developer. An interruption to
these systems for an extended period may impact our ability to operate the businesses and process transactions
which could result in a decline in sales and affect our ability to achieve or maintain profitability.
Fluctuations in operating results make financial forecasting difficult and could adversely affect the price of
our common stock. Our quarterly and annual revenues and operating results may fluctuate significantly for
numerous reasons, including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
The timing and successful introduction of additional manufacturing capacity;
The timing of the initial selection of our Wearable technology and display products as component in
our customers’ new products;
Availability of interface electronics for our display products;
Competitive pressures on selling prices of our products;
The timing and cancellation of customer orders;
Our ability to introduce new products and technologies on a timely basis;
Our ability to successfully reduce costs;
The cancellation of U.S. government contracts; and
Our ability to secure agreements from our major customers for the purchase of our products.
We typically plan our production and inventory levels based on internal forecasts of customer demand,
which are highly unpredictable and can fluctuate substantially. Our operating results are difficult to forecast
because we continue to invest in capital equipment and increase our operating expenses for new product
development.
20
As a result of these and other factors, investors should not rely on our revenues and our operating results for
any one quarter or year as an indication of our future revenues or operating results. If our quarterly revenues or
results of operations fall below expectations of investors or public market analysts, the price of our common
stock could fall substantially.
If we fail to comply with complex procurement laws and regulations, we could lose business and be liable
for various penalties or sanctions. We must comply with laws and regulations relating to the formation,
administration and performance of federal government contracts. These laws and regulations affect how we
conduct business with our federal government contracts. In complying with these laws and regulations, we may
incur additional costs, and non-compliance may also allow for the assignment of fines and penalties, including
contractual damages. Among the more significant laws and regulations affecting our business are the following:
•
•
•
•
The Federal Acquisition Regulation, which comprehensively regulates the formation, administration
and performance of federal government contracts;
The Truth in Negotiations Act, which requires certification and disclosure of all cost and pricing data in
connection with contract negotiations;
The Cost Accounting Standards and Cost Principles, which impose accounting requirements that
govern our right to reimbursement under certain cost-based federal government contracts; and
Laws, regulations and executive orders restricting the use and dissemination of information classified
for national security purposes and the export of certain products, services and technical data. We
engage in international work falling under the jurisdiction of U.S. export control laws. Failure to
comply with these control regimes can lead to severe penalties, both civil and criminal, and can include
debarment from contracting with the U.S. government.
Our contracting agency customers may review our performance under and compliance with the terms of our
federal government contracts. If a government review or investigation uncovers improper or illegal activities, we
may be subject to civil or criminal penalties or administrative sanctions, including
•
•
•
•
•
•
Termination of contracts;
Forfeiture of profits;
Cost associated with triggering of price reduction clauses;
Suspension of payments;
Fines; and
Suspension or debarment from doing business with federal government agencies.
Additionally, the False Claims Act provides for potentially substantial civil penalties where, for example, a
contractor presents a false or fraudulent claim to the government for payment or approval. Actions under the civil
False Claims Act may be brought by the government or by other persons on behalf of the government (who may
then share a portion of any recovery).
If we fail to comply with these laws and regulations, we may also suffer harm to our reputation, which could
impair our ability to win awards of contracts in the future or receive renewals of existing contracts. If we are
subject to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions or suffer harm to our reputation, our current
business, future prospects, financial condition, or operating results could be materially harmed.
The government may also revise its procurement practices or adopt new contracting rules and regulations,
including cost accounting standards, at any time. Any new contracting methods could be costly to satisfy, be
administratively difficult for us to implement and could impair our ability to obtain new contracts.
21
A decline in the U.S. government defense budget, changes in spending or budgetary priorities, prolonged
U.S. government shutdown or delays in contract awards may significantly and adversely affect our future
revenues, cash flow and financial results. The Budget Control Act of 2011 enacted 10-year discretionary
spending caps which are expected to generate over $1 trillion in savings for the U.S. government, a substantial
portion of which comes from Department of Defense baseline spending reductions. There remains much
uncertainty about the level of cuts that will be required for government fiscal year 2014 and the impact those cuts
will have on contractors supporting the government. In light of the current uncertainty, we are not able to predict
the potential impact of reduced military expenditures on our Company or our financial results.
A government shutdown and related matters could harm our business. The current uncertainty regarding
the federal budget and federal spending levels, including the possible impacts of a failure to increase the “debt
ceiling,” could disrupt our business. The impacts to our business of a prolonged government shutdown or failure
to increase the debt ceiling are uncertain at this time, but potential impacts include delay in payments owed to us
by the U.S. government and loss of revenue and profit on contracts that did not have government funding in
place, any of which could adversely affect our operations, cash flow and financial results.
Customer demands and new regulations related to conflict-free minerals may adversely affect us. The
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Act”) imposes new disclosure requirements
regarding the use of “conflict” minerals mined from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries
in products, whether or not these products are manufactured by third parties. These new requirements could
affect the pricing, sourcing and availability of minerals used in the manufacture of semiconductor devices
(including our products). We will incur additional costs associated with complying with the disclosure
requirements, such as costs related to determining the source of any conflict minerals used in our products. Our
supply chain is complex and we may be unable to verify the origins for all metals used in our products. We
purchase materials from foreign sources and they may not cooperate and provide us with the necessary
information to allow us to comply with the Act. This may require us to find alternative sources which could delay
product shipments. We may also encounter challenges with our customers and stockholders if we are unable to
certify that our products are conflict free.
We may incur significant liabilities if we fail to comply with stringent environmental laws and regulations
and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations or if we did not comply with these regulations in the past. We
are subject to a variety of federal, state and local governmental regulations related to the use, storage, discharge
and disposal of toxic or otherwise hazardous chemicals used in our manufacturing process. We are also subject to
federal International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) laws which regulate the export of technical data and
sale of products to other nations which may use these products for military purposes. The failure to comply with
present or future regulations could result in fines being imposed on us, suspension of production, or a cessation
of operations. Any failure on our part to control the use of, or adequately restrict the discharge of, hazardous
substances, or otherwise comply with environmental regulations, could subject us to significant future liabilities.
Any failure on our part to obtain any required licenses for the export of technical data and/or sales of our
products or to otherwise comply with ITAR, could subject us to significant future liabilities. In addition, we
cannot be certain that we have not in the past violated applicable laws or regulations, which violations could
result in required remediation or other liabilities. We also cannot be certain that past use or disposal of
environmentally sensitive materials in conformity with then existing environmental laws and regulations will
protect us from required remediation or other liabilities under current or future environmental laws or
regulations.
We may be unable to modify our products to meet regulatory or customer requirements. From time to time
our display products are subject to new domestic and international requirements such as the European Union’s
Restriction on Hazardous Substances (RoHS) Directive. If we are unable to comply with these regulations we
may not be permitted to ship our products, which would adversely affect our revenue and ability to maintain
profitability.
22
We may pursue acquisitions and investments that could adversely affect our business.
In the past we have
made, and in the future we may make, acquisitions of, and investments in, businesses, products and technologies
that could complement or expand our business. If we identify an acquisition candidate, we may not be able to
successfully negotiate or finance the acquisition or integrate the acquired businesses, products or technologies
into our existing business and products. Future acquisitions could result in potentially dilutive issuances of equity
securities, the incurrence of debt and contingent liabilities, amortization expenses and write-downs of acquired
assets. In 2013, 2012 and 2011 we acquired 51% of the outstanding shares of eMDT, Inc, 51% of the outstanding
shares of Ikanos Consulting Ltd. and 100% of the outstanding shares of Forth Dimension Displays Ltd. (FDD),
respectively. If we are unable to operate eMDT, Ikanos and FDD profitably, our results of operations will be
negatively affected.
We have also made minority investments in private companies including KoBrite and Ask Ziggy, and may
make future investments in similar companies. We perform periodic reviews to determine if these investments
are impaired, but such reviews are difficult and rely on significant judgment about the company’s technology,
ability to obtain customers, and ability to become cash flow positive and profitable. In 2013, we recorded
impairment charges of $5.0 million for companies in which we we were a minority investor. We may take future
impairment charges which will have an adverse impact of on our results of operations.
Investors should not expect to receive dividends from us. We have not paid cash dividends in the past
however in the future we may determine it is in the best interest of the stockholders do so. Historically our
earnings, if any, have been retained for the development of our businesses.
Our stock price may be volatile in the future. The trading price of our common stock has been subject to
wide fluctuations in response to quarter-to-quarter variations in results of operations, announcements of
technological innovations or new products by us or our competitors, general conditions in the wireless
communications, semiconductor and display markets, changes in earnings estimates by analysts or other events
or factors. In addition, the public stock markets recently have experienced extreme price and trading volatility.
This volatility has significantly affected the market prices of securities of many technology companies for
reasons frequently unrelated to the operating performance of the specific companies. These broad market
fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2.
Properties
We lease our 74,000 square foot CyberDisplay production facility in Westborough, Massachusetts, of which
10,000 square feet is contiguous environmentally controlled production clean rooms operated between Class 10
and Class 1,000 levels. The lease expires in 2023. In addition to our Massachusetts facility, we lease a 5,800
square foot design facility in Scotts Valley, California for developing prototypes of products incorporating our
CyberDisplay product and a 6,300 square foot facility in Santa Clara, California which houses our wearable
computing Tech center. These facility leases expire in 2014 and 2016, respectively.
Our subsidiary, Kowon Technology Co., LTD, (Kowon) owns two adjacent facilities in Kyungii-Do, South
Korea, in which it manufactured its products and in which its corporate headquarters are located. These facilities
occupy an aggregate of 28,000 square feet. Production ceased at the Kowon facility in 2013. Forth Dimension
Displays, our subsidiary in Scotland, leases 20,000 square feet in Dalgety Bay. This facility’s lease expires in
2016. Ikanos Consulting, Ltd., our subsidiary in the United Kingdom, leases two properties which occupy an
aggregate of 7,000 square feet. These leases expire in 2016 and 2017.
At this time we believe these properties are suitable for our needs for the foreseeable future.
23
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
We may engage in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Claims, suits, investigations
and proceedings are inherently uncertain and it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of such matters
and our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows could be affected in any particular
period.
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
24
Part II
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities
Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “KOPN.” The following
table sets forth, for the quarters indicated, the range of high and low sale prices for the Company’s common stock
as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market for the periods indicated.
Fiscal Year Ended December 28, 2013
First Quarter
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fourth Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fiscal Year Ended December 29, 2012
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
First Quarter
Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fourth Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
High
Low
$3.71
3.78
4.33
4.28
$4.08
4.05
3.86
3.87
$3.17
3.13
3.30
3.43
$3.30
3.06
3.23
2.94
As of March 7, 2014, there were approximately 458 stockholders of record of our common stock, which
does not reflect those shares held beneficially or those shares held in “street” name.
In the past three years we have not sold any securities which were not registered under the Securities Act.
We have not paid cash dividends in the past, nor do we expect to pay cash dividends for the foreseeable
future. We anticipate that earnings, if any, will be retained for the development of our businesses.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth information as of December 28, 2013 about shares of the Company’s common
stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights and available for issuance under our
existing equity compensation plans.
Plan Category
Total equity compensation plans approved by
Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(a)
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuance
under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column a)
security holders (1)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
558,850
$5.09
1,237,080(2)
(1) Consists of the 2001 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan.
(2) Shares available under the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan.
25
Company Stock Performance
The following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return for the Company,
the NASDAQ Stock Market and the S&P 500 Information Technology index. The graph assumes $100 was
invested in each of the Company’s common stock, the NASDAQ Stock Market and the S&P 500 Information
Technology index on December 28, 2008. Data points on the graph are annual. Note that historical price
performance is not necessarily indicative of future performance.
Kopin Corporation
S&P 500 Information Technology Index
Nasdaq Stock Market - U.S. Index
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
Dec 08
-
Dec 09
-
Dec 10
-
Dec 11
-
Dec 12
-
Dec 13
-
Kopin Corporation
S&P 500 Information Technology
Nasdaq Stock Market - U.S.
q
Issuer Purchase of Equity Securities
None
26
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data
This information should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto,
and our “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7 of
this Form 10-K. We have revised the prior period amounts for the sale of the III-V product line, which is
reflected as discontinued operations.
Statement of Operations Data:
Revenues:
Expenses:
Net product revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research and development revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of product revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research and development—funded programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research and development—internal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selling, general and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment of intangible assets and goodwill
(Loss) income from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other income and expense:
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other income and (expense), net
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency transaction (losses) gains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment of investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on remeasurement of investment in Ikanos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other-than-temporary impairment of marketable debt securities . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sales of investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sales of patents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Loss) income before benefit (provision) for income taxes, equity losses in
unconsolidated affiliates and net loss (income) of noncontrolling interest . . . .
Tax benefit (provision) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Loss) income before equity losses in unconsolidated affiliates and net loss
(income) of noncontrolling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity losses in unconsolidated affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Loss) income from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net (loss) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net loss (income) attributable to the noncontrolling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net (loss) income attributable to the controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net (loss) income per share:
Basic:
Continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net (loss) income per share: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted:
Continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net (loss) income per share: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fiscal Year Ended
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
(in thousands, except per share data)
$ 20,575
2,323
22,898
$ 31,299
3,343
34,642
$ 59,509
5,150
64,659
$ 54,969
3,172
58,141
$ 62,512
5,691
68,203
20,655
1,551
15,983
19,125
1,511
58,825
(35,927)
1,119
235
(387)
(5,000)
—
—
1,899
—
(2,134)
22,042
2,178
12,121
17,166
1,705
55,212
(20,570)
1,126
174
(1,032)
—
(558)
—
856
—
566
34,659
3,341
13,218
15,991
5,000
72,209
(7,550)
1,291
143
10
—
—
(151)
369
156
1,818
(38,061)
12,933
(20,004)
(1,099)
(5,732)
—
(5,732)
(297)
(25,128)
(625)
(21,103)
(680)
$ (25,753) $ (21,783) $ (6,029) $
2,789
(18,994)
632
20,147
(5,606)
896
$ (4,710) $ (18,362) $
$
9,713
3,684
(605)
3,079
35,597
2,175
10,972
12,322
—
61,066
(2,925)
1,978
(31)
(304)
—
—
—
2,598
770
5,011
2,086
54
2,140
(600)
1,540
7,300
8,840
(11)
8,829
39,003
3,060
8,295
13,047
—
63,405
4,798
2,053
464
(942)
—
—
(927)
—
6,324
6,972
11,770
(690)
11,080
(341)
$ 10,739
8,436
19,175
268
$ 19,443
$
$
$
$
(0.40) $
0.32
(0.08) $
(0.33) $
0.04
(0.29) $
(0.10) $
0.15
0.05
$
(0.40) $
0.32
(0.08) $
(0.33) $
0.04
(0.29) $
(0.10) $
0.15
0.05
$
0.02
0.12
0.14
0.02
0.11
0.13
$
$
$
$
0.16
0.13
0.29
0.16
0.13
0.29
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
62,348
62,348
63,618
63,618
64,406
65,234
66,020
66,712
66,850
67,458
Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and equivalents and marketable debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Working capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$112,729
108,369
146,132
329
134,563
$ 92,485
106,791
176,209
946
155,086
$105,419
123,257
193,872
1,296
170,097
$110,947
132,098
192,096
945
170,625
$114,547
134,198
183,224
903
164,302
Fiscal Year Ended
2013
2012
2011
2010
2009
27
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes
to those statements and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The following
discussion contains forward looking information that involves risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could
differ materially from those anticipated in the forward looking statements as a result of a number of factors,
including the risks discussed in Item 1A “Risk Factors”, and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon
our audited consolidated financial statements. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those
related to revenue recognition under the percentage-of-completion method, bad debts, inventories, warranty
reserves, investment valuations, valuation of stock compensation awards, recoverability of deferred tax assets,
liabilities for uncertain tax positions and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and on
various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form
the basis for making judgments about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not apparent from other
sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions.
The prior period amounts have been revised for the impact of discontinued operations due to the sale of our
III-V product line, including our KTC subsidiary. Our financial results for prior periods have also been revised,
in accordance with GAAP, to reflect certain changes to the business and other matters.
We believe the following critical accounting policies are most affected by our more significant judgments
and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue if four basic criteria have been met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;
(2) delivery has occurred and services rendered; (3) the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and
(4) collectability is reasonably assured. We do not recognize revenue for products prior to customer acceptance
unless we believe the product meets all customer specifications and has a history of consistently achieving
customer acceptance of the product. Provisions for product returns and allowances are recorded in the same
period as the related revenues. We analyze historical returns, current economic trends and changes in customer
demand and acceptance of product when evaluating the adequacy of sales returns and other allowances. Certain
product sales are made to distributors under agreements allowing for a limited right of return on unsold products.
Sales to distributors are primarily made for sales to the distributors’ customers and not for stocking of inventory.
We delay revenue recognition for our estimate of distributor claims of right of return on unsold products based
upon our historical experience with our products and specific analysis of amounts subject to return based upon
discussions with our distributors or their customers.
We recognize revenues from long-term research and development government contracts on the
percentage-of-completion method of accounting as work is performed, based upon the ratio of costs or hours
already incurred to the estimated total cost of completion or hours of work to be performed. Revenue recognized
at any point in time is limited to the amount funded by the U.S. government or contracting entity. We recognize
revenue for product development and research contracts that have established prices for distinct phases when
delivery and acceptance of the deliverable for each phase has occurred. In some instances, we are contracted to
create a deliverable which is anticipated to go into full production. In those cases, we discontinue the percentage-
of-completion method after formal qualification of the deliverable has been completed and revenue is then
recognized based on the criteria established for sale of products. In certain instances qualification may be
achieved and delivery of production units may commence however our customer may have either identified new
issues to be resolved or wish to incorporate a newer display technology. In these circumstances new units
delivered will continue to be accounted for under the criteria established for sale of products.
28
We classify amounts earned on contracts in progress that are in excess of amounts billed as unbilled
receivables and we classify amounts received in excess of amounts earned as billings in excess of revenues
earned. We invoice based on dates specified in the related agreement or in periodic installments based upon our
invoicing cycle. We recognize the entire amount of an estimated ultimate loss in our financial statements at the
time the loss on a contract becomes known.
Accounting for design, development and production contracts requires judgment relative to assessing risks,
estimating contract revenues and costs, and making assumptions for schedule and technical issues. Due to the
size and nature of the work required to be performed on many of our contracts, the estimation of total revenue
and cost at completion is complicated and subject to many variables. Contract costs include material, labor and
subcontracting costs, as well as an allocation of indirect costs. We have to make assumptions regarding the
number of labor hours required to complete a task, the complexity of the work to be performed, the availability
and cost of materials, and performance by our subcontractors. For contract change orders, claims or similar
items, we apply judgment in estimating the amounts and assessing the potential for realization. These amounts
are only included in contract value when they can be reliably estimated and realization is considered probable.
We have accounting policies in place to address these as well as other contractual and business arrangements to
properly account for long-term contracts. If our estimate of total contract costs or our determination of whether
the customer agrees that a milestone is achieved is incorrect, our revenue could be overstated and profits would
be negatively impacted.
Bad Debt
We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our
customers to make required payments. This estimate is based on an analysis of specific customer
creditworthiness and historical bad debts experience. If the financial condition of our customers were to
deteriorate, resulting in their inability to make future payments, additional allowances may be required.
Inventory
We provide a reserve for estimated obsolete or unmarketable inventory based on assumptions about future
demand and market conditions and our production plans. Inventories that are obsolete or slow moving are
generally fully reserved (representing the estimated net realizable value) as such information becomes available.
Our display products are manufactured based upon production plans whose critical assumptions include non-
binding demand forecasts provided by our customers, lead times for raw materials, lead times for wafer foundries
to perform circuit processing and yields. If a customer were to cancel an order or actual demand were lower than
forecasted demand, we may not be able to sell the excess display inventory and additional reserves would be
required. If we were unable to sell the excess inventory, we would establish reserves to reduce the inventory to its
estimated realizable value (generally zero).
Investment Valuation
We periodically make equity investments in private companies, accounted for on the cost or equity method,
whose values are difficult to determine. When assessing investments in private companies for an other-than-
temporary decline in value, we consider such factors as, among other things, the share price from the investee’s
latest financing round, the performance of the investee in relation to its own operating targets and its business
plan, the investee’s revenue and cost trends, the liquidity and cash position, including its cash burn rate and
market acceptance of the investee’s products and services. Because these are private companies which we do not
control we may not be able to obtain all of the information we would want in order to make a complete
assessment of the investment on a timely basis. Accordingly, our estimates may be revised if other information
becomes available at a later date.
29
In addition to the above we make investments in government and agency-backed securities and corporate
debt securities. For all of our investments we provide for an impairment valuation if we believe a decline in the
value of an investment is other-than-temporary, which may have an adverse impact on our results of operations.
The determination of whether a decline in value is other-than-temporary requires that we estimate the cash flows
we expect to receive from the security. We use publicly available information such as credit ratings and financial
information of the entity that issued the security in the development of our expectation of the cash flows to be
received. Historically, we have periodically recorded other than temporary impairment losses.
Product Warranty
We generally sell products with a limited warranty of product quality and a limited indemnification of
customers against intellectual property infringement claims related to our products. We accrue for known
warranty and indemnification issues if a loss is probable and can be reasonably estimated. As of December 28,
2013, we had a warranty reserve of $0.7 million, which represents the estimated liabilities for warranty claims in
process, potential warranty issues customers have notified us about and an estimate based on historical failure
rates. For the fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011, our warranty claims and reversals were approximately $0.8
million, $2.2 million and $1.4 million, respectively. If our estimates for warranty claims are incorrect, our profits
would be impacted.
Income Taxes
We have historically incurred domestic operating losses from both a financial reporting and tax return
standpoint. We establish valuation allowances if it appears more likely than not that our deferred tax assets will
not be realized. These judgments are based on our projections of taxable income and the amount and timing of
our tax operating loss carryforwards and other deferred tax assets. Given our federal operating tax loss
carryforwards, we do not expect to pay domestic federal taxes in the near term. It is possible that we could pay
domestic alternative minimum taxes and state income taxes. We are also subject to foreign taxes from our
Korean and U.K. subsidiary operations.
Our income tax provision is based on calculations and assumptions that will be subject to examination by
tax authorities. Despite our history of operating losses there can be exposures for state taxes, federal alternative
minimum taxes or foreign tax that may be due. We regularly assess the potential outcomes of these examinations
and any future examinations for the current or prior years in determining the adequacy of our provision for
income taxes. Should the actual results differ from our estimates, we would have to adjust the income tax
provision in the period in which the facts that give rise to the revision become known. Such adjustment could
have a material impact on our results of operations. We have historically established valuation allowances against
all of our net deferred tax assets because of our history of generating operating losses and restrictions on the use
of certain items. Our evaluation of the recoverability of deferred tax assets has also included analysis of the
expiration dates of net operating loss carryforwards. In forming our conclusions as to whether the deferred tax
assets are more likely than not to be realized we consider the sources of our income and the projected stability of
those sources and product life cycles. Over the last three fiscal years a significant component of our income has
been derived from sales of higher margin military products to the U.S. government. If , as expected, the U.S.
government significantly reduces funding for these programs our results of operations will be adversely affected.
In assessing our ability to realize our domestic deferred tax assets in the future, we consider the potential impact
of the U.S. government’s federal budget deficit on the U.S. military programs in which we currently participate
and those programs in which we anticipate participating in the future. A similar analysis is performed with
respect to our foreign subsidiaries.
Stock Compensation
There were no stock options granted in fiscal years 2013, 2012 or 2011. The fair value of nonvested
restricted common stock awards is generally the market value of the Company’s equity shares on the date of
30
grant. The nonvested common stock awards require the employee to fulfill certain obligations, including
remaining employed by the Company for certain periods of time (the vesting period) and in certain cases meeting
performance or market criteria. The performance or market criteria may consist of the achievement of the
Company’s annual incentive plan goals, technology development or the Company’s stock attaining a certain
price for a period of time. For nonvested restricted common stock awards which solely require the recipient to
remain employed with the Company, the stock compensation expense is amortized over the anticipated service
period. For nonvested restricted common stock awards which require the achievement of performance criteria,
the Company reviews the probability of achieving the performance goals on a periodic basis. If the Company
determines that it is probable that the performance criteria will be achieved, the amount of compensation cost
derived for the performance goal is amortized over the service period. If the performance criteria are not met, no
compensation cost is recognized and any previously recognized compensation cost is reversed. The Company
recognizes compensation costs on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for time vested awards.
For awards that vest upon our stock price achieving a certain price for a period of time the compensation expense
associated with this award is recognized over the derived service period.
Results of Operations
On January 16, 2013, we completed the sale of our III-V product line, including all of the outstanding equity
interest in KTC Wireless, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary which held our investment in Kopin Taiwan
Corporation (KTC), to IQE KC, LLC (IQE) and IQE plc (Parent, and collectively with IQE, the Buyer). Our
III-V products primarily consisted of our Gallium Arsenide-based HBT transistor wafers. The aggregate purchase
price was approximately $75 million, subject to certain adjustments, including working capital adjustments and
escrow. Upon agreement of the final working capital and other adjustments the net purchase price was $70.2
million, and the gain on the sale, net of tax, was $20.1 million. Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, $55
million was paid to us in January 2013, $0.2 million was paid in April 2013 and the remaining $15 million is
scheduled to be paid to us on the third anniversary of the Closing Date.
The following table provides the pro forma revenues of the Company as if the sale of the III-V product line
had been completed on December 26, 2010 (the first day of the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31,
2011) (in millions):
Consolidated
Revenues . . .
$93.4
2012
III-V
Product
Line
$58.8
Pro
Forma
$34.6
Consolidated
$131.1
2011
III-V
Product
Line
$66.5
Pro
Forma
$64.6
The following table provides the pro forma assets of the Company as if the sale of the III-V product line had
been completed on December 29, 2012 (in millions):
Total Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$176.2
$50.7
$125.5
Consolidated
III-V Product Line
Pro Forma
2012
We are a leading developer and manufacturer of miniature displays and in 2012 increased our software
development capabilities with investments in two companies. We use our proprietary semiconductor material
technology to design, manufacture and market our display products for use in highly demanding high-resolution
portable military, industrial and consumer electronic applications, training and simulation equipment and 3D
metrology equipment. Our products enable our customers to develop and market an improved generation of
products for these target applications.
We have two principal sources of revenues: product revenues and research and development revenues.
Research and development revenues consist primarily of development contracts with agencies or prime
31
contractors of the U.S. government. Research and development revenues were $2.3 million, or 10.0% of total
2013 revenues, $3.3 million, or 9.6% of total 2012 revenues and $5.1 million, or 7.9% of total 2011 revenues.
We manufacture transmissive microdisplays and reflective displays. In fiscal year 2012 the initial
manufacturing steps for our commercial transmissive display were performed in our Westborough,
Massachusetts, U.S.A. facility and then the back end packaging steps for our commercial transmissive display
products were performed at our Korean subsidiary, Kowon. If the transmissive display was for a U.S. military
application the entire display manufacturing process was performed in our Westborough, Massachusetts facility.
Commencing in 2013 both commercial and military transmissive display production is being performed entirely
in our Westborough, Massachusetts facility. Forth Dimension Displays (FDD), our wholly-owned subsidiary,
manufactures our reflective microdisplays in its facility located in Scotland and it is a reportable segment.
Because our fiscal year ends on the last Saturday of December every seven years we have a fiscal year
with 53 weeks. Our fiscal years 2013 and 2012 were 52 week years as compared to fiscal years 2011 which was
a 53 weeks year.
Fiscal Year 2013 Compared to Fiscal Year 2012
Revenues. Our revenues, which include product sales and amounts earned from research and development
contracts, for fiscal years 2013 and 2012, by category, were as follows:
Display Revenues by Category (in millions)
Military Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consumer Electronic Applications and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Eyewear Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research & Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013
2012
$ 8.6
8.1
3.9
2.3
$22.9
$19.6
8.6
3.0
3.4
$34.6
Sales of our products for military applications declined in 2013 because of reduced demand from the U.S.
government. The U.S. government is projected to incur large budget deficits for the near future and is expected to
reduce spending on military programs as part of the solution to decrease these deficits. We are currently
designing several new weapon sight systems which encompass our display within the weapon sight and overlays
certain information onto the sight’s reticule. We expect to be in the design phase for most if not all of fiscal year
2014. We expect limited orders for the new sight systems in 2015 but we cannot be assured that our new designs
will be selected by the government for deployment or if we are selected it will be deployed in 2015.
The decrease in the Consumer Electronic Applications and other category is the result of a decrease in sales
of our products for digital still cameras. Our ability to forecast our revenues in this category is very difficult as
sales of our product ultimately depend on how successful our customers are in promoting their digital still
camera (DSC) models. There are many DSC models offered by a number of large consumer electronics
companies and it is a very competitive product category. In addition we typically rebid to win this business each
year. The decrease in Research and Development revenues is the result of a decrease in funding from the U.S.
government. We are unable to predict the amount of funding for research and development by the U.S.
government as it addresses its fiscal deficit issues.
In 2011, we began offering a headworn, voice and gesture controlled, hands-free cloud computing reference
design for industrial applications that had an optical pod with our microdisplay and used Windows CE software.
We referred to the reference design as our Golden-i technology. In 2013 and 2012, we created a number of
additional reference design headsets target at other markets and developed an Android software platform. We
have rebranded the category and refer to the headset reference designs and other technologies we developed as
Kopin Wearable technologies of which the Golden-i headset reference design is for the industrial market
32
segment. Our Kopin Wearable technology encompasses both software and component technologies. The
software technology includes but is not limited to voice and gesture control, noise cancellation, android and
Windows CE based operating systems and web browsing. The component technologies include our displays,
optics, application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), backlights and ergonomic designs. Our strategy is to
license the headset reference designs and sell the various components included in the reference design as a group
or individually. Some of the technologies included in Kopin Wearable technologies are used with software or
components which we license or purchase from other companies. Customers may license only a subset of these
technologies depending on whether they wish to develop a military, industrial or consumer product. We entered
into an agreement to license the Golden-i reference design and know-how to a company that developed a product
and commenced offering it in the second half of 2013. The license is exclusive for a certain market; non-
exclusive for certain other markets and prohibits sales to other markets. Under the terms of the license we will
sell an optical pod which includes our display, optics and a back light. Sales of products based on the Golden-i
reference design were de minimis in 2013 and 2012 and were primarily to demonstrate the product concept. We
believe our ability to develop and expand the Kopin Wearable technologies and to market and license the Kopin
Wearable technologies will be important for us to achieve revenue growth, positive cash flow and to achieve
profitability. This is the first product that we have developed that has a significant software component. The
markets the Kopin Wearable technologies can be used in already have a number of existing product offerings
such as ruggedized lap-top computers and tablets. The companies that offer these products are significantly larger
than we are. We expect to incur significant development and marketing costs in 2014 to commercialize the Kopin
Wearable technologies. We have a product category which we refer to as “Eyewear Applications”. This category
is the predecessor of wearable products as it refers to devices that use our display products to show
entertainment, emails or similar data. We currently expect revenue of between $18 million and $22 million for
fiscal year 2014, however our ability to forecast revenues derived from Kopin Wearable technologies, which may
significantly impact our results of operations, is very limited. We currently expect to have a consolidated net loss
in the range of $32 million to $40 million in 2014 and, excluding the impact of the effects of working capital, our
stock buyback program, and other investing activities, we expect cash usage between $30 million and $35
million to fund operations for fiscal 2014.
We have provided estimated 2014 revenue and net loss ranges in order for the investor to understand the
expected changes in our remaining business in 2014 as compared to 2013. However, we believe we have an
opportunity to position ourselves in the growing wearable computing market and therefore our primary focus in 2014
is on developing technology and products and establishing relationships and not necessarily achieving revenue, or
any other particular financial metric. Accordingly, our 2014 net losses may exceed our current estimates.
There are a number of different display technologies which can produce displays in small form factors. We
believe one of the benefits of our display technology is the ability to produce high-resolution displays in small
form factors. The digital still camera (DSC) market is mature and the majority of these devices use low-
resolution display products which results in our having limited, if any, competitive advantage over our
competitors and, therefore, the ability to sell displays into these markets is very price dependent. Accordingly, for
us to maintain or increase display revenues with above average gross margins, we will need to increase sales to
customers who buy our higher resolution display products, such as the military, or develop new categories, such
as our Kopin Wearable technologies.
International sales represented 48% and 27% of product revenues for fiscal years 2013 and 2012,
respectively. Our international sales are primarily denominated in U.S. currency. Consequently, a strengthening
of the U.S. dollar could increase the price in local currencies of our products in foreign markets and make our
products relatively more expensive than competitors’ products that are denominated in local currencies, leading
to a reduction in sales or profitability in those foreign markets. In addition, our Korean subsidiary, Kowon, holds
U.S. dollars in order to pay various expenses. As a result, our financial position and results of operations are
subject to exchange rate fluctuation in transactional and functional currency. We have not taken any protective
measures against exchange rate fluctuations, such as purchasing hedging instruments with respect to such
fluctuations, because of the historically stable exchange rate between the Japanese yen, Korean won and the
U.S. dollar.
33
Cost of Product Revenues.
Cost of product revenues (in millions) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of product revenues as a % of revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 20.7
100.4% 70.3%
$22.0
2013
2012
Cost of product revenues, which is comprised of materials, labor and manufacturing overhead related to the
production of our products increased as a percentage of revenues in 2013 as compared to 2012 due to a decrease
in the sale of our display products for military applications, normal price declines and lower unit sales of our
display products. Military products historically have higher gross margins than commercial products. The
reduced volume of sales resulted in an increase in fixed cost per display which reduced the gross margin per
display sale.
Research and Development. Research and development (R&D) expenses are incurred in support of
internal display development programs or programs funded by agencies or prime contractors of the U.S.
government and commercial partners. In fiscal year 2014 our R&D expenditures will be related to our display
products, over lay weapon sights and Kopin Wearable technologies. R&D revenues associated with funded
programs are presented separately in revenue in the statement of operations. Research and development costs
include staffing, purchases of materials and laboratory supplies, circuit design costs, fabrication and packaging of
display products, and overhead. For fiscal years 2013 and 2012 R&D expense was as follows (in millions):
Research and development expense
Funded . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Internal
Total
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013
2012
$ 1.5
16.0
$17.5
$ 2.2
12.1
$14.3
R&D expense increased in 2013 as compared to the prior year primarily because of investments made to
develop wearable reference designs, including display development and software costs, partially offset by a
decrease in government funded product development.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative (S,G&A) expenses consist of the
expenses incurred by our sales and marketing personnel and related expenses, and administrative and general
corporate expenses.
Selling, general and administrative expense (in millions)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selling, general and administrative expense as a % of revenues . . . . . . . . .
$19.1
82.3% 49.6%
$17.2
2013
2012
The increase in S,G&A expenses in 2013 as compared to 2012 is primarily attributable to additional stock
compensation expense.
Impairment.
In 2013, we performed an impairment analysis of our finite-lived intangible assets related to
FDD and Ikanos. We performed our analysis of our finite-lived intangible assets based on the income approach.
As a result we recorded a non-cash charge of $1.5 million to write down the finite-lived intangible assets. In
2012, we performed an impairment analysis of our finite-lived intangible assets and goodwill balance related to
FDD, as FDD’s actual results were less than originally forecast. We performed our analysis of our finite-lived
intangible assets based on a comparison of the undiscounted cash flows to the recorded carrying value of the
intangible assets. As a result, there was no change in the carrying values of the finite-lived intangible assets,
however, we recorded a non-cash charge of $1.7 million to write down the remaining carrying value of the
goodwill to zero.
34
(in millions)
Assets acquired with acquisition of FDD at January 11, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment
As of December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment of goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency translation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
As of December 29, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment of goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency translation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
As of December 28, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Intangible
Assets
$ 4.6
(0.7)
(2.0)
$ 1.9
(0.3)
—
0.1
$ 1.7
(0.4)
(1.2)
0.1
$ 0.2
Other Income and Expense.
(in millions)
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other income and expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency transaction losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sales of investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment of investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on investment in Ikanos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013
2012
$ 1.1
0.3
(0.4)
$ 1.1
0.2
(1.0)
0.3
0.9
1.0
1.9
(5.0) —
—
(0.6)
Other income and expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$(2.1)
$ 0.6
Other income and expense, net, as shown above, is composed of interest income, foreign currency
transactions and remeasurement gains and losses incurred by our Korean and United Kingdom subsidiaries,
other-than-temporary impairment on marketable debt securities, gains on sales of investments and license fees
and the impairment of cost based investments. For 2013, we recorded $0.4 million of foreign currency losses as
compared to $1.0 million foreign currency losses for 2012. This was primarily attributable to increased
fluctuations in the U.S. dollar and Korean won currency exchange rate. In 2013 we recorded a $5.0 million
impairment charge for two cost basis investments due their experiencing liquidity issues. Other income and
expense, net for 2011 also includes expense of $0.2 million to record an impairment of certain marketable debt
securities which were deemed other-than-temporarily impaired.
As our marketable debt securities have matured we have been reinvesting in securities which, due to current
interest rates and shorter maturities, have lower yields than the securities which matured. As a result of these
factors and our cash usage rate we anticipate that our interest income will decline in 2014.
Equity losses in unconsolidated affiliates. Our equity losses in unconsolidated affiliates for 2013 consists
of our approximate 23% shares of the losses of Ask Ziggy, totaling $0.2 million, and our approximate 12% share
of the losses of KoBrite, totaling $0.4 million. Our equity losses in unconsolidated affiliates in 2012 consisted of
our approximate 12% share of the losses of KoBrite totaling $0.6 million, and our 25% share of the losses of
Ikanos totaling $0.1 million. In July of 2012 we increased our investment in Ikanos to 51% and commenced
consolidating Ikanos’s results of operations into our results of operations.
Tax provision. The benefit for income taxes for the fiscal year ended 2013 of $12.9 million represents the
net of state and foreign tax and intra period tax allocations related to the Company’s discontinued operations and
35
withholding taxes related to closing our Korean facilities. For 2014 we expect to have taxes based on U.S. federal
tax liabilities on federal alternative minimum tax rules and on our foreign operations. We also expect to have a
state tax provision in 2014.
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest.
In 2013 we acquired 51% of eMDT and in 2012
we acquired 51% of Ikanos Consulting Ltd. The remaining 49% of eMDT and Ikanos are held by other investors
and employees of eMDT and Ikanos.We also own approximately 93% of the equity of Kowon as of
December 28, 2013.
Net loss (income) attributable to the noncontrolling interest on the consolidated statement of operations
represents the portion of the results of operations of Kowon , Ikanos and eMDT which are allocated to the
stockholders of the approximately 7% of Kowon and 42% of Ikanos and 49% of eMDT not owned by us. The
change in the net loss (income) attributable to the noncontrolling interest of our subsidiaries is as follows (in
millions):
Kowon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ikanos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
eMDT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013
$0.1
0.5
0.3
$0.9
2012
$ 0.3
0.7
—
$ 1.0
Fiscal Year 2012 Compared to Fiscal Year 2011
Revenues. Our revenues, which include product sales and amounts earned from research and development
contracts, for fiscal years 2012 and 2011, by category, were as follows (in millions):
Display Revenues by Category (in millions)
Military Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consumer Electronic Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Eyewear Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research & Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2012
2011
$19.6
8.6
3.0
3.4
$34.6
$38.9
16.5
4.0
5.2
$64.6
Sales of our products for military applications declined in 2012 because of reduced demand from the U.S.
government. Our military products have higher profit margins than our other display products and have been a
significant contributor to our overall profitability for the past several years.
The increase in the Consumer Electronic Applications category is the result of an increase in sales of our
products for digital still cameras. The increase in Research and Development revenues is the result of an increase
in funding from the U.S. government.
In 2011, we began offering an industrial headworn, voice and gesture controlled, hands-free cloud
computing reference design that has an optical pod with a microdisplay which we refer to as Golden-i
technology. Sales of Golden-i technology enabled products in 2012 and 2011 were de minimis and were
primarily to demonstrate the product concept.
International sales represented 27% and 24% of product revenues for fiscal years 2012 and 2011,
respectively. Our international sales are primarily denominated in U.S. currency. We have not taken any
protective measures against exchange rate fluctuations, such as purchasing hedging instruments with respect to
such fluctuations, because of the historically stable exchange rate between the Japanese yen, Korean won and the
U.S. dollar.
36
Cost of Product Revenues.
Cost of product revenues (in millions) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of product revenues as a % of revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$22.0
70.3% 58.2%
$34.7
2012
2011
Cost of product revenues, which is comprised of materials, labor and manufacturing overhead related to the
production of our products increased as a percentage of revenues in 2012 as compared to 2011 due to a decrease
in the sale of our display products for military applications, normal price declines and lower unit sales of our
display products. Military products historically have higher gross margins than commercial products.
Research and Development. Research and development (R&D) expenses are incurred in support of
internal display development programs or programs funded by agencies or prime contractors of the U.S.
government and commercial partners. In fiscal year 2013 our R&D expenditures will be related to our display
products and Golden-i technologies. R&D revenues associated with funded programs are presented separately in
revenue in the statement of operations. Research and development costs include staffing, purchases of materials
and laboratory supplies, circuit design costs, fabrication and packaging of display products, and overhead. For
fiscal years 2012 and 2011 R&D expense was as follows (in millions):
Research and development expense
Funded . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Internal
Total
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2012
2011
$ 2.2
12.1
$14.3
$ 3.3
13.2
$16.5
R&D expense decreased in 2012 as compared to the prior year primarily because of decreases in
government funded display activities and costs to develop display products partially offset by an increase in costs
to develop the Golden-i technologies.
Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative (S,G&A) expenses consist of the
expenses incurred by our sales and marketing personnel and related expenses, and administrative and general
corporate expenses.
Selling, general and administrative expense (in millions)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selling, general and administrative expense as a % of revenues . . . . . . . . .
$17.2
49.6% 24.7%
$16.0
2012
2011
The increase in S,G&A expenses in 2012 as compared to 2011 is primarily attributable to additional stock
compensation expense.
Impairment. On January 11, 2011, we purchased 100% of the outstanding common stock of FDD for
approximately $11.0 million plus contingent consideration. In accounting for the acquisition of FDD, we
allocated $4.3 million to identifiable intangible assets and $4.6 million to goodwill. The allocations were based
on estimated cash flows as of the acquisition date. During fiscal year 2011 the actual operating results and cash
flows generated by FDD were less than originally forecasted and at year end, using revised forecasts, we
performed our annual review of intangible assets and goodwill. As a result of this review we recorded a non-cash
charge of $5.0 million to write down the carrying value of the intangible assets and the goodwill to its implied
fair market value based on projected discounted cash flows. The impairment of goodwill represented a 64%
decrease in its recorded value. As of June 30, 2012, we performed an interim impairment analysis of our finite-
lived intangible assets and goodwill balance related to FDD, as FDD’s actual results were less than originally
forecast for the six-month period then ended. We performed our analysis of our finite-lived intangible assets
based on a comparison of the undiscounted cash flows to the recorded carrying value of the intangible assets. As
37
a result, there was no change in the carrying values of the finite-lived intangible assets, however, we recorded a
non-cash charge of $1.7 million to write down the remaining carrying value of the goodwill to zero. No
additional impairments were taken in 2012. FDD produces a very high resolution micro display for niche
markets. The majority of its current and forecasted revenues are derived from a small group of customers (less
than 10). In addition approximately 50% of FDD’s forecasted sales over the next 10 years are dependent on
relatively new customers. If FDD loses any of its significant customers, or the products which it is projecting to
provide significant revenue in the future fail to meet expectations and are not complemented by other revenue
sources, additional impairment charges may be necessary. The below table reports the activity during the year
ended December 29, 2012.
(in millions)
Intangible
Assets
Goodwill
Assets acquired with acquisition of FDD at Jan. 11, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency translation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
As of December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment of goodwill
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency translation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
As of December 29, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 4.6
(0.7)
(2.0)
—
$ 1.9
(0.3)
—
0.1
$ 1.7
$ 4.6
—
(2.9)
—
$ 1.7
—
(1.7)
—
$—
Other Income and Expense.
(in millions)
2012
2011
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other income and expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency transaction losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other-than-temporary Impairment of marketable debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 1.3
0.1
$ 1.1
0.2
(1.0) —
—
(0.2)
Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sales of investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sales of patents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
0.3
0.9
(0.6)
1.2
0.4
0.2
Other income and expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 0.6
$ 1.8
Other income and expense, net, as shown above, is composed of interest income, foreign currency
transactions and remeasurement gains and losses incurred by our Korean and United Kingdom subsidiaries,
other-than-temporary impairment on marketable debt securities, gains on sales of investments and license fees.
For 2012, we recorded $1.0 million of foreign currency losses as compared to $0 foreign currency gains for 2011.
This was primarily attributable to increased fluctuations in the U.S. dollar and Korean won currency exchange
rate. Other income and expense, net for 2011 also includes expense of $0.2 million to record an impairment of
certain marketable debt securities which were deemed other-than-temporarily impaired.
We had entered into agreements to sell certain patents which we were not using. The total consideration we
receive for the sale of the patents is a percentage of any sublicense fees, after expenses, the buyer receives. Under
the agreements, in 2011 we sold patents that had a carrying value of $0 for $0.2 million. There is no additional
consideration to be received for the patents sold. We continue to evaluate the patents in our portfolio for
opportunities to monetize these assets.
38
Equity losses in unconsolidated affiliates. Our equity losses in unconsolidated affiliates in 2012 consists of
our approximate 12% share of the losses of KoBrite totaling $0.6 million, and our 25% share of the losses of
Ikanos totaling $0.1 million. In July 2012 we increased our investment in Ikanos to 51% and commenced
consolidating Ikanos’s results of operations into our results of operations. Our equity losses in unconsolidated
affiliates in 2011 consists of our approximate 12% share of the losses of KoBrite totaling $0.3 million.
Tax provision. The provision for income taxes for the fiscal year ended 2012 of $1.1 million represents
withholding taxes related to closing our Korean facilities. For 2013 we expect to have taxes based on U.S federal
tax liabilities on federal alternative minimum tax rules and on our foreign operations. We also expect to have a
state tax provision in 2013.
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest. During the three month period ended March 31,
2012 we acquired a 25% interest in Ikanos, for $0.7 million and in the three month period ended September 29,
2012, we purchased from Ikanos an additional 70,748 newly issued shares of its common stock for
approximately $2.5 million. As a result of these transactions we own approximately 51% of the outstanding
common stock of Ikanos. The remaining 49% is held by other investors and employees of Ikanos.
We owned approximately 78% of the equity of Kowon as of December 29, 2012. Net loss (income)
attributable to the noncontrolling interest on the consolidated statement of operations represents the portion of the
results of operations of Kowon and Ikanos which are allocated to the stockholders of the approximately 22% of
Kowon and 49% of Ikanos not owned by us. The change in the net (income) loss attributable to the
noncontrolling interest of our subsidiaries is as follows (in millions):
Kowon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ikanos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2012
$0.3
0.7
$1.0
2011
$—
—
$—
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of December 28, 2013, we had cash and equivalents and marketable debt securities of $112.7 million and
working capital of $108.4 million compared to $92.5 million and $106.8 million, respectively, as of
December 29, 2012. The increase in cash and equivalents and marketable securities was primarily due to cash
from the sale of the III-V product line of $55.2 million, proceeds from sales of investments of $2.6 million, offset
by the net of cash used in operating activities of $19.0 million, capital expenditures of $0.7 million, the
acquisition of certain cost based investments for $3.5 million, repurchase of our common stock for $8.0 million
and the purchase of incremental investment in Kowon of $3.7 million.
As of December 29, 2012, we had cash and equivalents and marketable debt securities of $92.5 million and
working capital of $106.8 million compared to $105.4 million and $123.3 million, respectively, as of
December 31, 2011. The decrease in cash and equivalents and marketable securities was primarily due to
proceeds from sales of investments of $0.9 million, which were offset by capital expenditures of $9.8 million, the
acquisition of certain cost based investments for $2.2 million, repurchase of our common stock for $3.5 million
and net purchase of marketable debt securities and other assets of $2.5 million offset cash provided by operating
activities of approximately $3.8 million.
39
Cash and marketable debt securities held in U.S. dollars at December 28, 2013 were:
Domestic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 99,206,478
10,394,377
Subtotal cash and marketable debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
109,600,855
Cash and marketable debt securities held in other currencies and converted
to U.S. dollars . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3,128,346
Total cash and marketable debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$112,729,201
We have no plans to repatriate the cash and marketable debt securities held in our foreign subsidiaries FDD
and Ikanos and as such we have not recorded any deferred tax liability. In 2013, we ceased operations at our
Korean facility, Kowon. Kowon has approximately $13.1 million of cash and marketable debt securities which
we anticipate will eventually be remitted to the U.S. and accordingly we have recorded deferred tax liabilities
associated with its unremitted earnings.
We lease facilities located in Westborough, Massachusetts, Santa Clara, California and Scotts Valley,
California, under non-cancelable operating leases. The Westborough lease expires in 2023, the Santa Clara lease
expires in 2016 and the Scotts Valley lease expires in November 2014.
We lease a facility in Dalgety Bay, Scotland which expires in 2016, and also lease two facilities in
Nottingham, United Kingdom, which expire in 2016 and 2017.
We expect to expend between $2.0 million and $3.0 million on capital expenditures over the next twelve
months, primarily related to infrastructure changes resulting from the sale of our III-V product line and for the
acquisition of equipment to support some of our cost based investments.
As of December 28, 2013, we had substantial tax loss carry-forwards, which may be used to offset future
federal taxes due. We may record a tax provision in our financial statements but we may be able to offset some or
all of the amounts that are payable with our tax loss carry-forwards. We may be subject to alternative minimum
taxes, foreign taxes and state income taxes depending on our taxable income and sources of taxable income.
Historically we have financed our operations primarily through public and private placements of our equity
securities. Over the past several years we have generated sufficient cash from operations to fund the business.
We believe our available cash resources, including the proceeds from the sale of our III-V product line, will
support our operations and capital needs for at least the next twelve months.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Seasonality
Our revenues have not followed a seasonal pattern for the past two years and we do not anticipate any
seasonal trend to our revenues in 2014.
Climate Change
We do not believe there is anything unique to our business which would result in climate change regulations
having a disproportional effect on us as compared to U.S. industry overall.
40
Inflation
We do not believe our operations have been materially affected by inflation in the last three fiscal years.
Contractual Obligations
The following is a summary of our contractual payment obligations for operating leases as of December 28,
2013:
Contractual Obligations
Total
Less than 1 year
1-3 Years
3-5 years More than 5 years
Operating Lease Obligations . . . . $7,353,133
$1,266,185
$2,678,281 $1,279,333
$2,129,334
41
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We invest our excess cash in high-quality U.S. government, government-backed (Fannie Mae, FDIC
guaranteed bonds and certificates of deposit) and corporate debt instruments, which bear lower levels of relative
risk. We believe that the effect, if any, of reasonably possible near-term changes in interest rates on our financial
position, results of operations and cash flows should not be material to our cash flows or income. It is possible
that interest rate movements would increase our unrecognized gain or loss on interest rate securities.
We are exposed to changes in foreign currency exchange rates primarily through our translation of our
foreign subsidiary’s financial positions, results of operations, and transaction gains and losses as a result of non-
U.S. dollar denominated cash flows related to business activities in Asia, and remeasurement of U.S. dollars to
the functional currency of our foreign subsidiaries. We are also exposed to the effects of exchange rates in the
purchase of certain raw materials whose price is in U.S. dollars but the price on future purchases is subject to
change based on the relationship of the Japanese Yen to the U.S. dollar. We do not currently hedge our foreign
currency exchange rate risk. We estimate that any market risk associated with our international operations is
unlikely to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operation. Our
portfolio of marketable debt securities is subject to interest rate risk although our intent is to hold securities until
maturity. The credit rating of our investments may be affected by the underlying financial health of the
guarantors of our investments. We use Silicon wafers but do not enter into forward or futures hedging contracts.
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The financial statements required by this Item are included in this Report on pages 45 through 72. Reference
is made to Item 15 of this Report.
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Not applicable.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our “disclosure controls and
procedures” (Disclosure Controls), as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as of
December 28, 2013. The controls evaluation was conducted under the supervision and with the participation of
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Disclosure Controls are controls
and procedures designed to reasonably assure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under
the Exchange Act, such as this Form 10-K, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC’s) rules and forms. Disclosure
Controls are also designed to reasonably assure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. Our quarterly evaluation of Disclosure Controls includes an evaluation
of some components of our internal control over financial reporting, and internal control over financial reporting
is also separately evaluated on an annual basis for purposes of providing the management report which is set
forth below.
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period
covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
42
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. A company’s internal control over
financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and
principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the Company’s Board of
Directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles and include those policies and procedures that:
•
•
•
Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company;
Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the company; and
Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use
or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of
December 28, 2013, based on the criteria outlined in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Based on their assessment, management concluded that, as of December 28, 2013, the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
Our independent registered public accounting firm that audited our consolidated financial statements
included in this Form 10-K has issued an attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting. This
report appears below.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During our last fiscal quarter, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that
have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
43
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Kopin Corporation
Westborough, Massachusetts
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Kopin Corporation and subsidiaries (the
“Company”) as of December 28, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework
(1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s
management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for their
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Management’s Annual Report On Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our
audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a
material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based
on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of,
the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and
effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of
collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be
prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal
control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 28, 2013, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework
(1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year ended
December 28, 2013, of the Company and our report dated March 17, 2014 expressed an unqualified opinion on
those financial statements and financial statement schedule and included an explanatory paragraph regarding the
Company’s sale of its III-V product line, including its investment in subsidiary Kopin Taiwan Corporation.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 17, 2014
44
Part III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information required under this item is incorporated herein by reference from our Proxy Statement
relating to our 2014 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the Proxy Statement). In addition to the disclosures made
in our Proxy Statement and incorporated by reference herein, information with respect to executive officers
required by this item is set forth in Part I of this Report.
Code of Ethics. We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the Code) that applies to all of
our employees (including our CEO and CFO) and directors. The Code is available on our website at
www.kopin.com. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement regarding any amendment to or waiver of a
provision of the Code applicable to any executive officer or director, by posting such information on our website.
Our corporate governance guidelines, whistleblower policy and the charters of the audit committee,
compensation committee and nominating and corporate governance committee of the Board of Directors as well
as other corporate governance document materials are available on our website at www.kopin.com under the
heading “Investors”, then “Corporate Governance” then “Governance Documents”.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required under this item is contained in our Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by
reference from the Proxy Statement.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the Proxy Statement. Refer
also to the equity compensation plan information set forth in Part II Item 5 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the Proxy Statement.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the Proxy Statement.
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(1) Consolidated Financial Statements:
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Balance Sheets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statements of Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(2) Financial Statement Schedule:
Page
49
50
51
51
52
53
54
Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
80
45
Schedules other than the one listed above have been omitted because of the absence of conditions under
which they are required or because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements
or the notes thereto.
(3) Exhibits
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
4
10.1
10.5
10.6
10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11
10.12
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation
Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation
Fourth Amended and Restated By-laws
Specimen Certificate of Common Stock
Form of Employee Agreement with Respect to Inventions and Proprietary Information
Kopin Corporation 2001 Equity Incentive Plan
Kopin Corporation 2001 Equity Incentive Plan Amendment
Kopin Corporation 2001 Equity Incentive Plan Amendment
Kopin Corporation 2001 Equity Incentive Plan Amendment
Kopin Corporation 2001 Equity Incentive Plan Amendment
Kopin Corporation 2001 Supplemental Equity Incentive Plan
Form of Key Employee Stock Purchase Agreement
License Agreement by and between the Company and Massachusetts Institute of Technology
dated April 22, 1985, as amended
10.13
Facility Lease, by and between the Company and Massachusetts Technology Park
Corporation, dated October 15, 1993
10.14
Joint Venture Agreement, by and among the Company, Kowon Technology Co., Ltd., and
Korean Investors, dated as of March 3, 1998
10.15
Seventh Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and Dr. John
C.C. Fan, dated as of December 8, 2010
10.16
Kopin Corporation Form of Stock Option Agreement under 2001 and 2010 Equity Incentive
Plans
10.17
Kopin Corporation 2001 and 2010 Equity Incentive Plan Form of Restricted Stock Purchase
10.18
10.20
10.21
21.1
23.1
31.1
Agreement
Kopin Corporation Fiscal Year 2013 Incentive Bonus Plan
Kopin Corporation 2010 Equity Incentive Plan
Purchase Agreement, dated January 10, 2013, by and among Kopin Corporation, IQE KC,
LLC and IQE plc
Subsidiaries of Kopin Corporation
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(2)
(5)
(5)
(8)
(1)
(1)
(7)*
(9)*
(10)*
(11)*
(13)*
(6)*
(1)*
(1)
(3)
(4)
(16)
(12)*
(12)*
*
(15)
31.2
Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1
Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
**
46
32.2
Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
**
101
The following materials from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 28, 2013, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language):
(i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations,
(iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss), (iv) Consolidated Statements of
Stockholder’s Equity, (v)Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text
* Management contract or compensatory plan required to be filed as an Exhibit to this Form 10-K.
** This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in
any filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before
or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any filing.
(1) Filed as an exhibit to Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 33-45853, and incorporated herein by
reference.
(2) Filed as an exhibit to Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 33-57450, and incorporated herein by
reference.
(3) Filed as an exhibit to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993 and
incorporated herein by reference.
(4) Filed as an exhibit to Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 27, 1998 and
incorporated herein by reference.
(5) Filed as an exhibit to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 1, 2000 and
incorporated herein by reference.
(6) Filed as an exhibit to Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed on November 13, 2011 and incorporated
herein by reference.
(7) Filed as an appendix to Proxy Statement filed on April 20, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference.
(8) Filed as an exhibit to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 12, 2008 and incorporated herein by
reference.
(9) Filed as an exhibit to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on August 16, 2002 and incorporated
herein by reference
(10) Filed as an exhibit to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on March 15, 2004 and incorporated herein
by reference.
(11) Filed as an exhibit to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on May 10, 2004 and incorporated herein
by reference.
(12) Filed as an exhibit to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2004 and
incorporated herein by reference.
(13) Filed as an exhibit to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on April 15, 2008 and incorporated herein
by reference.
(14) Filed as an exhibit to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2009 and
incorporated by reference herein.
(15) Filed with the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14 filed as of April 5, 2013 and
incorporated by reference herein.
(16) Filed as an exhibit to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2010 and
incorporated by reference herein.
(17) Filed as an exhibit to Current Report on Form 8-K on January 10, 2013 and incorporated by reference
herein.
47
KOPIN CORPORATION
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012, and
Page
49
50
December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
51
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the years ended December 28, 2013,
December 29, 2012, and December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
51
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 28, 2013, December 29,
2012 and December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
52
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012
and December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
53
54
48
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Kopin Corporation
Westborough, Massachusetts
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Kopin Corporation and subsidiaries (the
“Company”) as of December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, comprehensive (loss) income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 28, 2013. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at
Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial
statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Kopin Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012, and the results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 28, 2013, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion,
such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements
taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company sold its III-V product line,
including its investment in subsidiary, Kopin Taiwan Corporation, on January 16, 2013. The results of the III-V
product line are included in income from discontinued operations, net of tax, for all periods presented and assets
and liabilities of the III-V product line are classified as held for sale as of December 29, 2012.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 28, 2013, based on the
criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 17, 2014 expressed an unqualified
opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
March 17, 2014
49
KOPIN CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 28,
2013
December 29,
2012
Current assets:
ASSETS
Cash and equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Marketable debt securities, at fair value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $202,000 and $311,000 in 2013
and 2012, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts receivable from unconsolidated affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unbilled receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current assets held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property, plant and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Intangible assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Notes receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Noncurrent assets held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 16,756,666
95,972,535
$ 27,135,387
65,349,962
2,388,461
—
—
3,078,055
233,642
1,178,643
—
119,608,002
6,034,963
1,016,132
1,581,502
3,024,458
14,866,666
—
$ 146,131,723
5,254,549
84,780
178,036
5,789,753
683,032
917,841
21,573,729
126,967,069
8,486,406
684,789
2,316,924
8,607,882
—
29,145,732
$ 176,208,802
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued payroll and expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued warranty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Billings in excess of revenue earned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current liabilities held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset retirement obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Noncurrent liabilities held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
$
3,868,865
1,436,391
716,000
547,681
3,157,394
1,512,771
—
11,239,102
329,435
—
$
5,121,324
2,147,512
716,000
1,220,395
2,563,797
1,304,513
7,102,895
20,176,436
322,477
623,979
Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share: authorized, 3,000 shares; none
issued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common stock, par value $.01 per share: authorized, 120,000,000 shares;
issued 77,567,631 shares in 2013 and 75,979,695 shares in 2012;
outstanding 62,560,946 in 2013 and 63,835,508 in 2012, respectively . . .
Additional paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Treasury stock (12,032,537 and 9,861,139 shares in 2013 and 2012,
respectively, at cost) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated other comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated deficit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Kopin Corporation stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Noncontrolling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
—
745,935
320,511,458
736,966
318,928,495
(42,442,932)
3,441,997
(147,703,211)
134,553,247
9,939
134,563,186
$ 146,131,723
(34,450,978)
6,512,792
(142,993,595)
148,733,680
6,352,230
155,085,910
$ 176,208,802
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
50
KOPIN CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Fiscal year ended
Revenues:
Net product revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research and development revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expenses:
Cost of product revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research and development-funded programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research and development-internal
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selling, general and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment of intangible assets and goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other income and expense:
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other income and (expense), net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency transaction (losses) gains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sales of investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on investment in Ikanos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other-than-temporary impairment of marketable debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment of investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sales of patents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss from continuing operations before benefit (provision) for income taxes, and equity
losses in unconsolidated affiliates and net loss (income) of noncontrolling interest
. . . . . . .
Tax benefit (provision) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss before equity losses in unconsolidated affiliates and net loss (income) of noncontrolling
interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity losses in unconsolidated affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net (loss) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net loss (income) attributable to the noncontrolling interest
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net (loss) income attributable to the controlling interest
Net (loss) income per share:
Basic:
Continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net (loss) income per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted:
Continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net (loss) income per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013
2012
2011
$ 20,574,812
2,322,897
22,897,709
$ 31,298,419
3,343,441
34,641,860
$59,508,959
5,149,644
64,658,603
20,655,216
1,550,873
15,983,147
19,124,750
1,511,414
58,825,400
(35,927,691)
1,118,617
235,917
(387,351)
1,899,291
—
—
(5,000,442)
—
22,041,953
2,178,472
12,121,689
17,165,870
1,704,770
55,212,754
(20,570,894)
1,126,344
173,829
(1,032,588)
856,170
(557,594)
—
—
—
(2,133,968)
566,161
34,659,020
3,341,075
13,218,018
15,990,881
4,999,512
72,208,506
(7,549,903)
1,291,591
142,948
9,672
368,641
—
(150,644)
—
155,658
1,817,866
(38,061,659)
12,933,209
(20,004,733)
(1,099,000)
(5,732,037)
—
(25,128,450)
(625,098)
(25,753,548)
20,147,532
(21,103,733)
(679,587)
(21,783,320)
2,789,048
(5,732,037)
(296,451)
(6,028,488)
9,713,059
$ (5,606,016) $(18,994,272) $ 3,684,571
(605,207)
$ (4,709,616) $(18,361,930) $ 3,079,364
632,342
896,400
$
$
$
$
(0.40) $
0.32
(0.08) $
(0.40) $
0.32
(0.08) $
(0.33) $
0.04
(0.29) $
(0.33) $
0.04
(0.29) $
(0.10)
0.15
0.05
(0.10)
0.15
0.05
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:
Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
62,347,852
63,617,680
64,405,776
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
62,347,852
63,617,680
65,234,212
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME
Fiscal years ended
Net (loss) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Foreign currency translation adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrealized holding (loss) gain on marketable securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reclassifications of gains in net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive (loss) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Comprehensive (loss) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Comprehensive gain (loss) attributable to the noncontrolling interest
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to the controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013
2012
$(5,606,016) $(18,994,272) $ 3,684,571
2011
231,321
(116,134)
(1,936,121)
2,687,344
730,967
(586,433)
$(1,820,934) $ 2,831,878
(16,162,394)
167,232
(1,368,829)
(260,502)
(457,808)
$(2,087,139)
1,597,432
(357,389)
$(6,555,083) $(15,995,162) $ 1,240,043
(7,426,950)
871,867
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
51
KOPIN CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common Stock
Shares
Amount
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
Treasury
Stock
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
Accumulated
Deficit
Total Kopin
Corporation
Stockholders’
Equity
Noncontrolling
interest
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
Balance December 25,
2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72,570,835 $725,708 $313,311,889 $(26,580,823) $ 5,985,345
—
—
19,700
897,953
72,248
(8,980)
197
8,980
—
—
Exercise of stock options . . . .
Vesting of restricted stock . . .
Stock based compensation
$(127,711,030) $165,731,089
72,445
—
—
—
$ 4,778,034
—
—
$170,509,123
72,445
—
—
—
—
—
3,361,948
—
(262,230)
—
—
(2,622)
—
—
(1,026,945)
—
—
(4,414,626)
—
—
—
—
—
(1,839,321)
—
—
3,361,948
(1,839,321)
—
(247,818)
3,361,948
(2,087,139)
—
—
—
—
—
3,079,364
(1,029,567)
(4,414,626)
3,079,364
—
—
605,207
(1,029,567)
(4,414,626)
3,684,571
2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73,226,258 732,263 315,710,160
(30,995,449)
4,146,024
(124,631,666) 164,961,332
5,135,423
671,568
6,716
(6,716)
$
— $
—
— $
—
— $
—
— $
—
— $
—
170,096,756
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(201,182)
—
—
(2,013)
—
—
3,851,672
—
—
—
(626,621)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(3,455,529)
—
—
2,366,768
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(18,361,930)
3,851,672
—
3,851,672
2,366,768
465,110
2,831,878
—
—
—
1,384,039
1,384,039
(628,634)
(3,455,529)
(18,361,930)
—
—
(632,342)
(628,634)
(3,455,529)
(18,994,272)
expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive loss . . . .
Restricted stock for tax
withholding obligations . . .
Treasury stock purchase . . . . .
Net income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance December 31,
Exercise of stock options . . . .
Vesting of restricted stock . . .
Stock based compensation
expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive
income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency translation
adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition of Ikanos equity
interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restricted stock for tax
withholding obligations . . .
Treasury stock purchase . . . . .
Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance, December 29,
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73,696,644 $736,966 $318,928,495 $(34,450,978) $ 6,512,792
—
12,169
(12,169)
—
Vesting of restricted stock . . . 1,216,900
Stock based compensation
$(142,993,595) $148,733,680
—
—
$ 6,352,230
—
$155,085,910
—
expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive loss . . . .
Sale of III-V product line . . . .
Acquisition of eMDT . . . . . . .
Acquisition of noncontrolling
interest in Kowon . . . . . . . .
Restricted stock for tax
withholding obligations . . .
Treasury stock purchase . . . . .
Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance, December 28,
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(320,061)
—
—
(3,200)
—
—
3,804,408
—
—
—
(1,020,130)
(1,189,146)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(7,991,954)
—
—
(1,845,466)
(1,580,629)
—
355,300
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(4,709,616)
3,804,408
(1,845,466)
(1,580,629)
—
—
24,532
(2,673,051)
200,198
3,804,408
(1,820,934)
(4,253,680)
200,198
(664,830)
(2,997,570)
(3,662,400)
(1,192,346)
(7,991,954)
(4,709,616)
—
—
(896,400)
(1,192,346)
(7,991,954)
(5,606,016)
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74,593,483 $745,935 $320,511,458 $(42,442,932) $ 3,441,997
$(147,703,211) $134,553,247
$
9,939
$134,563,186
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
52
KOPIN CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Fiscal year ended
Cash flows from operating activities:
2013
2012
2011
Net (loss) income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash (used in) provided by
$ (5,606,016) $(18,994,272) $ 3,684,571
operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accretion (amortization) of premium or discount on marketable debt
securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net gain on investment transactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Losses in unconsolidated affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment on marketable debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment of intangible assets and goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sale of III-V product line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Release of valuation allowance on deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on remeasurement of investment in Ikanos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment of investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in allowance for bad debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other non-cash items . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts payable and accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Billings in excess of revenue earned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3,646,725
9,111,943
8,598,672
360,403
4,203,408
(1,899,291)
625,098
—
1,511,414
(33,452,176)
—
252,687
341,590
—
5,000,442
(107,694)
733,428
4,853,073
2,262,547
(179,858)
(773,471)
(672,714)
(287,439)
4,486,990
(856,170)
679,587
—
1,704,770
—
—
2,162,246
1,236,194
557,594
—
(129,370)
402,938
4,363,447
3,466,568
126,580
(2,996,339)
(1,247,066)
(152,665)
3,923,628
(368,641)
296,451
150,644
4,999,512
—
(4,266,000)
—
14,150
—
—
(224,644)
379,246
256,190
993,328
1,055,482
655,611
(743,434)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . .
(18,900,405)
3,788,201
19,252,101
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sale of marketable debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of marketable debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sale of III-V product line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash included in current assets held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash paid to acquire Ikanos, net of cash acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash paid to acquire eMDT, net of cash acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash paid to acquire FDD, net of cash acquired . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchases of cost based investment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sale of investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
17,130,488
(49,329,891)
55,188,020
—
—
211,484
—
(3,583,611)
2,597,289
(10,552)
(741,543)
37,305,871
(39,853,837)
40,732,353
(42,345,935)
—
(2,388,812)
93,872
—
94,351
(2,249,784)
856,170
43,564
(9,831,967)
—
—
—
—
(10,084,307)
(1,980,609)
392,196
16,906
(7,132,371)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . .
21,461,684
(15,930,572)
(20,401,767)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Treasury stock purchases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of noncontrolling interest in Kowon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Settlements of restricted stock for tax withholding obligations . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(7,991,954)
(3,662,400)
(1,192,346)
—
(3,455,529)
(4,414,626)
—
(628,634)
—
—
(1,029,567)
72,445
Net cash used in financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(12,846,700)
(4,084,163)
(5,371,748)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(93,300)
266,758
(217,970)
Net decrease in cash and equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(10,378,721)
(15,959,776)
(6,739,384)
Cash and equivalents:
Beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
27,135,387
43,095,163
49,834,547
End of year
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 16,756,666
$ 27,135,387
$ 43,095,163
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Income taxes paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
95,000
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing activities:
Construction in progress included in accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-cash proceeds from sale of III-V product line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
105,000
$ 14,866,000
$
$
$
75,000
$
186,000
360,000
$
— $
469,000
—
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
53
KOPIN CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.
Fiscal Year
The Company’s fiscal year ends on the last Saturday in December. The fiscal years ended December 28,
2013 and December 29, 2012 include 52 weeks, and the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 includes 53 weeks,
and are referred to as fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, herein.
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly owned subsidiaries, a
majority owned 93% subsidiary, Kowon Technology Co., Ltd. (Kowon), located in Korea, a majority owned
(58)% subsidiary, Ikanos Consulting Ltd. (Ikanos), located in the United Kingdom, and a majority owned (51)%
subsidiary, eMDT America Inc (eMDT), located in California (collectively the Company). All intercompany
transactions and balances have been eliminated. Amounts of Kowon, Ikanos and eMDT not attributable to the
Company are referred to as noncontrolling interests in the consolidated statements of operations and consolidated
statements of comprehensive (loss) income. Investments in business entities in which the Company does not have
control but has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies are accounted for
by the equity method.
In 2013, the Company paid approximately $3.7 million to acquire an additional 15% ownership in its
Kowon subsidiary which raised its ownership from 78% to 93%. The Company ceased its production activities at
its Kowon facility in 2013 but as of December 28, 2013, the closure of this facility did not meet the criteria for
assets held for sale.
Revenue Recognition
The Company recognizes revenue if four basic criteria have been met: (1) persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred and services rendered; (3) the price to the buyer is fixed or
determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. The Company does not recognize revenue for products
prior to customer acceptance unless it believes the product meets all customer specifications and the Company
has a history of consistently achieving customer acceptance of the product. Provisions for product returns and
allowances are recorded in the same period as the related revenues. The Company analyzes historical returns,
current economic trends and changes in customer demand and acceptance of product when evaluating the
adequacy of sales returns and other allowances. Certain product sales are made to distributors under agreements
allowing for a limited right of return on unsold products. Sales to distributors are primarily made for sales to the
distributor’s customers and not for their stocking of inventory. The Company delays revenue recognition for its
estimate of distributor claims of right of return on unsold products based upon its historical experience with the
Company’s products and specific analysis of amounts subject to return based upon discussions with the
Company’s distributors or their customers.
The Company recognizes revenues from long-term research and development contracts on the percentage-
of-completion method of accounting as work is performed, based upon the ratio of costs or hours already
54
KOPIN CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
incurred to the estimated total cost of completion or hours of work to be performed. Revenue recognized at any
point in time is limited to the amount funded by the U.S. government or contracting entity. The Company
accounts for product development and research contracts that have established prices for distinct phases as if
each phase were a separate contract. In some instances, the Company is contracted to create a deliverable which
is anticipated to be qualified and go into full rate production stages. In those cases, the revenue recognition
methodology will change from the percentage of completion method to the units-of-delivery method as new
contracts are received after formal qualification has been completed.
The Company classifies amounts earned on contracts in progress that are in excess of amounts billed as
unbilled receivables and classifies amounts received in excess of amounts earned as billings in excess of
revenues earned. The Company invoices based on dates specified in the related agreement or in periodic
installments based upon its invoicing cycle. The Company recognizes the entire amount of an estimated ultimate
loss in its financial statements at the time the loss on a contract becomes known.
Research and Development Costs
Research and development expenses are incurred in support of internal display product development
programs or programs funded by agencies or prime contractors of the U.S. government and commercial partners.
Research and development costs include staffing, purchases of materials and laboratory supplies, circuit design
costs, fabrication and packaging of experimental display products, and overhead, and are expensed immediately.
Cash and Equivalents and Marketable Securities
The Company considers all highly liquid, short-term debt instruments with original maturities of three
months or less to be cash equivalents.
Marketable debt securities consist primarily of commercial paper, medium-term corporate notes, and United
States government and agency backed securities. The Company classifies these marketable debt securities as
available-for-sale at fair value in “Marketable debt securities, at fair value.” In fiscal year 2013, the investment in
Vuzix Corporation (Vuzix) was included in “Other Assets” as available-for-sale and at fair value. In fiscal year
2012, the investments in Advanced Wireless Semiconductor Company (AWSC) and WIN Semiconductor Corp.
(WIN) were included in “Other assets” as available-for-sale and at fair value and these securities were sold in
2013. The Company records the amortization of premium and accretion of discounts on marketable debt
securities in the results of operations.
The Company uses the specific identification method as a basis for determining cost and calculating realized
gains and losses with respect to marketable debt securities. The gross gains and losses realized related to sales of
marketable debt securities were not material during fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011.
Inventory
Inventory is stated at the lower of cost (determined on the first-in, first-out method) or market and consists
of the following at December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012:
Raw materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Work-in-process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Finished goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$1,441,569
1,003,540
632,946
$2,540,497
1,880,202
1,369,054
2013
2012
$3,078,055
$5,789,753
55
KOPIN CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation and amortization are provided using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally 3 to 10 years. Leasehold
improvements and leased equipment are amortized over the shorter of the term of the lease or the useful life of
the improvement or equipment. As discussed below, obligations for asset retirement are accrued at the time
property, plant and equipment is initially purchased or as such obligations are generated from use.
Intangible assets
Intangible assets include patents, customer relationships, developed technology and trademarks. Customer
relationships represent the fair value of the underlying relationships with customers. Developed technology
represents the fair value of technology as it exists in current products and has value through its continued use or
reuse. The trademark represents the brand and name recognition associated with the marketing of products and
was determined to have a finite life.
Identifiable intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of
the assets, generally three to seven years.
Product Warranty
The Company generally sells products with a limited warranty of product quality and a limited
indemnification of customers against intellectual property infringement claims related to the Company’s
products. The Company accrues for known warranty and indemnification issues if a loss is probable and can be
reasonably estimated, and accrues for estimated incurred but unidentified issues based on historical activity. As
of December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012, the Company had warranty reserves of $0.7 million. For the
fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011 warranty claims and reversals were approximately $0.8 million, $2.2 million
and $1.4 million, respectively.
Asset Retirement Obligations
The Company recorded asset retirement obligations (ARO) liabilities of $0.3 million at December 28, 2013
and December 29, 2012, respectively. This represents the legal obligations associated with retirement of the
Company’s assets when the timing and/or method of settling the obligation are conditional on a future event that
may or may not be within the control of the Company.
Beginning balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accretion and exchange rate change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reclassified to noncurrent liabilities held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$322,477
—
—
6,958
—
$1,295,670
32,360
(424,785)
43,211
(623,979)
Ending balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$329,435
$ 322,477
2013
2012
Income Taxes
The consolidated financial statements reflect provisions for federal, state, local and foreign income taxes.
The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences attributable to
56
KOPIN CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective
tax basis, as well as operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. The Company measures deferred tax assets and
liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences and carryforwards are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and
liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The
Company provides valuation allowances if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not
that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Foreign Currency
Assets and liabilities of non-U.S. operations where the functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar are
translated from the functional currency into U.S. dollars at year end exchange rates, and revenues and expenses at
average rates prevailing during the year. Resulting translation adjustments are accumulated as part of
accumulated other comprehensive income. Transaction gains or losses are recognized in income or loss in the
period in which they occur.
Net (Loss) Income Per Share
Basic net (loss) income per share is computed using the weighted-average number of shares of common
stock outstanding during the period less any unvested restricted shares. Diluted earnings per common share is
calculated using weighted-average shares outstanding and contingently issuable shares, less weighted-average
shares reacquired during the period. The net outstanding shares are adjusted for the dilutive effect of shares
issuable upon the assumed conversion of the Company’s common stock equivalents, which consist of
outstanding stock options and unvested restricted stock.
Weighted-average common shares outstanding used to calculate earnings per share, is as follows:
Weighted-average common shares outstanding—basic . . . . . .
Stock options and nonvested restricted common stock . . . . . . .
62,347,852
—
63,617,680
—
64,405,776
828,436
Weighted-average common shares outstanding—diluted . . . . .
62,347,852
63,617,680
65,234,212
2013
2012
2011
The following were not included in weighted-average common shares outstanding- diluted because they are
anti-dilutive or performance conditions have not been met at the end of the period.
Nonvested restricted common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3,024,148
558,850
2,283,048
983,680
613,934
1,561,925
Total
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3,582,998
3,266,728
2,175,859
2013
2012
2011
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk other than
marketable securities consist principally of trade accounts receivable and the note receivable from IQE, plc.
Trade receivables are primarily derived from sales to manufacturers of consumer electronic devices and wireless
components or military applications.
57
KOPIN CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The Company primarily invests its excess cash in government backed and corporate financial instruments
that management believes to be of high credit worthiness, which bear lower levels of relative credit risk. The
Company relies on rating agencies to ascertain the credit worthiness of its marketable securities and, where
applicable, guarantees by the Federal Deposit Insurance Company. The Company sells its products to customers
worldwide and generally does not require collateral. The Company maintains a reserve for potential credit losses.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Financial instruments consist of current assets (except inventories, income tax receivables and prepaid
assets) and certain current liabilities. Current assets (excluding marketable securities which are recorded at fair
value) and current liabilities are carried at cost, which approximates fair value.
Stock-Based Compensation
The fair value of stock option awards is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton
option-pricing model. There were no stock options granted in fiscal years 2013, 2012 or 2011.
The fair value of nonvested restricted common stock awards is generally the market value of the Company’s
equity shares on the date of grant. The nonvested restricted common stock awards require the employee to fulfill
certain obligations, including remaining employed by the Company for one, two or four years (the vesting
period) and in certain cases also require meeting either performance criteria or the Company’s stock achieving a
certain price. The performance criteria primarily consist of the achievement of the Company’s annual incentive
plan goals. For nonvested restricted common stock awards which solely require the recipient to remain employed
with the Company, the stock compensation expense is amortized over the anticipated service period. For
nonvested restricted common stock awards which require the achievement of performance criteria, the Company
reviews the probability of achieving the performance goals on a periodic basis. If the Company determines that it
is probable that the performance criteria will be achieved, the amount of compensation cost derived for the
performance goal is amortized over the service period. If the performance criteria are not met, no compensation
cost is recognized and any previously recognized compensation cost is reversed. The Company recognizes
compensation costs on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for time vested awards.
In 2013, the Company granted compensation awards to its Chief Executive Officer that consisted of two
grants of 150,000 shares of restricted stock each. One of the grants will vest at the end of the first 10 consecutive
trading day period following the grant date during which the Company’s common stock trades at a price per
share equal to or greater than $6.00. The other award will vest at the end of the first 10 consecutive trading day
period following the grant date during which the Company’s common stock trades at a price per share equal to or
greater than $7.00. In 2011, the Company granted compensation awards to its Chief Executive Officer that
consisted of a grant of 260,000 shares of restricted stock and a grant of 380,000 shares of phantom stock to be
settled in cash. The 260,000 shares of restricted stock and the 380,000 shares of phantom stock will vest at the
end of the first 10 consecutive trading day period following the grant date during which the Company’s common
stock trades at a price per share equal to or greater than $5.25, prior to September 12, 2016. The vesting of the
awards upon achieving a closing stock price of $6.00, $7.00 and $5.25 for 10 consecutive days is considered a
market condition. The accounting for the 150,000, 150,000 and 260,000 shares requires the fair market value of
the shares to be determined on the grant day and then this fair market value is expensed straight-line over the
derived service period. The accounting for the phantom stock award requires the Company to periodically assess
the fair market value of the award, with increases or decrease in the fair market value being reflected in the
statements of operations.
58
KOPIN CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
In 2013, the Company granted a compensation award to its Chief Executive Officer that consisted of a grant
of 300,000 shares of restricted stock that will vest upon the Company shipping 50,000 units of a new display.
The compensation cost of this award will be recognized over the period the Company ships the displays. As of
December 28, 2013, these awards were not yet earned and no compensation expense has been recorded.
Comprehensive (Loss) Income
Comprehensive (loss) income is the total of net income and all other non-owner changes in equity including
such items as unrealized holding (losses) gains on marketable equity and debt securities classified as available-
for-sale and foreign currency translation adjustments.
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income are as follows:
Cumulative
Translation
Adjustment
Unrealized Holding
(Loss) Gain on
Marketable
Securities
Balance as of December 25, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes during year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 2,440,881
(1,121,011)
$ 3,797,302
(971,148)
Balance as of December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes during year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,319,870
2,222,234
Balance as of December 29, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes during year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
3,542,104
(1,017,403)
2,826,154
144,534
2,970,688
(2,053,392)
Balance as of December 28, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 2,524,701
$
917,296
$
Non-Credit
Related
Losses on
Investments
$(252,838)
252,838
—
—
—
—
—
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
$ 5,985,345
(1,839,321)
4,146,024
2,366,768
6,512,792
(3,070,795)
$ 3,441,997
Assets Held for Sale
Assets and liabilities held for sale as of December 29, 2012 pertain to applicable assets and liabilities of the
Company’s III-V product line and its investment in Kopin Taiwan Corporation. The Company finalized the sale
on January 16, 2013.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The Company periodically reviews the carrying value of our long-lived assets to determine if facts and
circumstances suggest that they may be impaired or that the amortization or depreciation period may need to be
changed. The carrying value of a long-lived asset is considered impaired when the anticipated identifiable
undiscounted cash flows from such asset are less than its carrying value. For assets that are to be held and used,
impairment is measured based upon the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value.
The carrying value of the Company’s long-lived assets was $6.0 million at December 28, 2013.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
Statement of Comprehensive Income
In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU) No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. ASU No. 2013-02 requires an entity to provide information about
the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. In addition, an entity is
required to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant
amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by the respective line items of net income
59
KOPIN CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
but only if the amount reclassified is required under United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(U.S. GAAP) to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts that
are not required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-
reference to other disclosures required under U.S. GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts.
ASU No. 2013-02 is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The Company adopted
this ASU on December 30, 2012 with no impact on its financial statements.
During the twelve months ended December 28, 2013, the change in the Company’s accumulated other
comprehensive income was the net of $0.2 million cumulative translation adjustment, $(0.1) million unrealized
holding losses on marketable securities, $(1.9) million of reclassified holding gains, $(1.6) million related to the
sale of its III-V product line and $0.4 million million related to its acquisition of additional noncontrolling
interest in Kowon.
2. Discontinued Operations
On January 16, 2013, (the Closing Date), the Company sold its III-V product line, including all of the
outstanding equity interest in KTC Wireless, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company that held the
Company’s investment in KTC, to IQE KC, LLC (IQE) and IQE plc (Parent, and collectively with IQE, the
Buyer) pursuant to a Purchase Agreement (the Purchase Agreement) entered into on January 10, 2013 for an
aggregate purchase price of approximately $75 million, subject to certain adjustments, including working capital
adjustments and escrow (the Sale). After adjustments for working capital items the final purchase price was
$70.2 million of which $55.2 million was paid to the Company in 2013 and the remaining $15 million will be
paid to the Company on the third anniversary of the Closing Date. Payment of the $15 million was recorded at its
estimated discount value of $14.8 million and is secured by liens on certain assets of the business sold.
The operating results of the III-V product line prior to the sale are reported within Income from
discontinued operations, net of tax, in the consolidated statement of operations and have been excluded from
segment results. The assets and liabilities associated with the III-V product line are presented in current assets
held for sale, noncurrent assets held for sale, current liabilities held for sale and noncurrent liabilities held for
sale in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 29, 2012.
The following table summarizes the results from discontinued operations:
Net product and research and development revenues . . . .
(Loss) gain from discontinued operations before income
taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Provision) benefit for income taxes on discontinued
operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sale, net of $13.1 million of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fiscal Years Ended (in millions)
December 28,
2013
December 29,
2012
December 31,
2011
$ 2.3
$58.8
$66.5
(0.2)
—
(0.2)
20.4
4.5
(1.7)
2.8
—
5.9
3.8
9.7
—
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax . . . . . . .
$20.2
$ 2.8
$ 9.7
60
KOPIN CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table summarizes the assets and the liabilities held for sale in the Company’s consolidated
balance sheet as of December 29, 2012:
Current assets
Cash and equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $0.1 million . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts receivable from unconsolidated affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total current assets held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property, plant and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total noncurrent assets held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(in millions)
$ 2.4
7.6
0.6
10.6
0.2
0.2
21.6
25.7
3.3
0.1
29.1
Total assets held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$50.7
Current liabilities
Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued payroll and expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued warranty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total current liabilities held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total noncurrent liabilities held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 3.7
1.8
0.2
1.4
$ 7.1
$ 0.6
3. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following at December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012:
Useful Life
2013
2012
Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Buildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Life of the lease
Furniture and fixtures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equipment under construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
10 years
3-5 years
3 years
Accumulated depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
915,595
2,398,188
20,993,220
3,441,553
910,270
623,503
$
901,934
2,424,152
23,219,534
11,157,960
783,030
1,673,390
29,282,329
(23,247,366)
40,160,000
(31,673,594)
Net property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 6,034,963
$ 8,486,406
There were no material gains or losses on disposals of long-lived assets in fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011.
Depreciation expense for the fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011 was approximately $2.4 million, $3.5 million and
$3.8 million, respectively.
61
KOPIN CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
4. Other Assets and Note Receivable
Other assets consist of the following as of December 28, 2013 and December 29, 2012:
Marketable Equity Securities
AWSC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
WIN . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vuzix Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
— $1,764,657
1,410,388
—
—
1,433,102
Non-Marketable Securities—Equity Method Investments
KoBrite . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-Marketable Securities-Cost Based Investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
1,421,592
—
169,764
1,828,404
3,485,394
119,039
2013
2012
$3,024,458
$8,607,882
Marketable Equity Securities
As of December 28, 2013, the Company had an investment in Vuzix with a fair market value of $1.4 million
and an adjusted cost basis of $0. In 2013, the Company sold its investments in Advanced Wireless
Semiconductor Company (AWSC) and WIN Semiconductor Corp. (WIN) for $1.2 million and $1.4 million,
respectively, and recorded a gain on the sale of the investments of $1.9 million. As of December 29, 2012, the
Company had an investment in WIN, with a fair market value of $1.4 million and an adjusted cost basis of $0. In
the twelve month period ended December 29, 2012 the Company sold 500,000 shares of WIN and recorded a
gain of $0.9 million. As of December 29, 2012, the Company had an investment in AWSC, with a fair market
value of $1.8 million and an adjusted cost basis of $0.7 million.
The table below shows amounts sold by the Company (revenues) from AWSC which are reflected in
discontinued operations:
AWSC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$—
$8,192,000
$11,800,000
2013
2012
2011
As of December 29, 2012 the Company was owed $0.5 million from AWSC and $0.1 million from other
related parties.
Non-Marketable Securities—Equity Method Investments
Equity losses in unconsolidated affiliates recorded in the consolidated statement of operations are as
follows:
KoBrite . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ikanos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ask Ziggy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$(406,811)
—
$(218,287)
$(573,265)
(106,322)
$
—
$(296,451)
—
—
$
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$(625,098)
$(679,587)
$(296,451)
2013
2012
2011
62
KOPIN CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The Company has an approximate 12% interest in KoBrite at December 28, 2013. The Company accounts
for its interest using the equity method and at December 28, 2013 the carrying value of the investment was $1.4
million. KoBrite’s results are recorded one quarter in arrears. One of the Company’s Directors, who is the
chairman of IQE Taiwan, is a member of the Board of Directors of Bright LED, one of the other principal
investors of KoBrite.
During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company acquired a 25% interest in Ikanos, a private
company, for $0.7 million. On July 10, 2012, the Company invested an additional $2.5 million, which increased
the Company’s interest in Ikanos to 51%. For the six month period ended June 30, 2012, the Company recorded
the results of operation of Ikanos on the equity method of accounting and commencing in the third quarter of
2012 the Company consolidated Ikanos.
In 2012, the Company acquired a 5% interest in a private company Ask Ziggy (AZ), for $1.0 million. In
January and August of 2013, the Company acquired an additional 10% and 5.8% for $900,000 and $700,000,
respectively. During the third quarter of 2013, AZ repurchased shares of its common stock from an unrelated
third party stockholder and as a result the Company now owns approximately 23.0% of AZ. At December 28,
2013, the Company determined that the AZ investment of $2.5 million was impaired and wrote the investment
down to $0. The Company has also entered into an agreement to purchase an additional 2.0% of AZ for $200,000
if certain milestones are achieved.
Summarized financial information for 2011 includes KoBrite for the year ended September 30, 2011.
(Kobrite’s results are recorded one quarter in arrears). Summarized financial information for 2012 includes
Kobrite for the period ended September 30, 2012 and Ikanos, operating results only, for the six month period
January 1, 2012 through June 30, 2012. Summarized financial information for 2013 includes Kobrite for the year
ended September 30, 2013 and AZ for the five month period August 1, 2013 through December 28, 2013, and are
as follows:
2013
2012
2011
Current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Noncurrent assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Margin loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 7,769,000
10,663,000
1,207,000
5,085,000
(2,501,000)
(6,114,000)
(5,526,000)
$ 9,581,000
12,701,000
1,215,000
6,010,000
(2,732,000)
(4,938,000)
(5,308,000)
$12,468,000
15,927,000
5,397,000
7,938,000
(794,000)
(2,685,000)
(2,526,000)
The Company has a loan to a non-officer employee for approximately $140,000 at December 28, 2013,
which is currently due.
During the first quarter of 2013, the Company acquired four patents for $1.8 million and hired the patents’
inventor. Upon commencement of employment the Company issued to the employee 400,000 shares of the
Company’s common stock, of which 100,000 shares were immediately vested and 300,000 shares will vest upon
the achievement of certain milestones.
During the twelve months ended December 28, 2013, the Company recorded impairment charges of $2.5
million related to the write-off of a cost based investment.
63
KOPIN CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The Company has a $14.9 million receivable as a result of the sale of its III-V product line and investment
in KTC which is due January 16, 2016. The receivable is collateralized by certain assets of the Buyer of III-V
product line. The Buyer has outstanding debt and the repayment of the receivable is subject to the Buyer
remaining within its debt compliance obligations at the time of repayment.
5. Business Combinations
Ikanos
During the three month period ended March 31, 2012 the Company acquired a 25% interest in Ikanos, a
private company, for $0.7 million and accounted for its interest using the equity method of accounting. On July 10,
2012, the Company purchased an additional 70,748 newly issued shares of Ikanos common stock for approximately
$2.5 million, from Ikanos (the “Transaction”). As a result of this transaction and the Company’s previous
investment in Ikanos, the Company owns approximately 51% of the outstanding stock of Ikanos. The remaining
49% is held by other investors and employees of Ikanos. The Company began consolidating Ikanos on July 1, 2012.
The total purchase price was $2,581,000 and is comprised of
Cash consideration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fair market value of Kopin’s previously held equity method investment in Ikanos . . . . .
$2,500,000
81,000
Total purchase price . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$2,581,000
The purchase price was as follows:
Cash and marketable securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Customer Relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trade name . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other identifiable assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Identifiable liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Noncontrolling interest in Ikanos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
July 10, 2012 (As
initially reported)
$ 2,594,000
167,000
277,000
—
—
1,141,000
111,000
(325,000)
(1,384,000)
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 2,581,000
$
Measurement
period
adjustments
$
—
—
—
400,000
170,000
(456,000)
—
(114,000)
—
—
July 10, 2012
(As adjusted)
$ 2,594,000
167,000
277,000
400,000
170,000
685,000
111,000
(439,000)
(1,384,000)
$ 2,581,000
The Company remeasured and decreased its investment in Ikanos by approximately $558,000 within the
statement of operations which represented the fair market value of the investment immediately prior to the
Transaction.
The results of operations of the Ikanos acquisition have been included in the consolidated statements of
operations from the time the Company assumed majority ownership, approximately July 1, 2012. Ikanos’ net loss
from operations included in the consolidated results of operation for the year ended December 29, 2012 was $1.5
million. The transaction related costs associated with the Ikanos acquisition were considered immaterial and are
included within selling, general and administrative expense for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2012. The
goodwill will not be deductible for tax purposes. In 2013, Ikanos repurchased some of its outstanding common
stock and the Company increased its ownership of Ikanos to 58%.
64
KOPIN CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
eMDT
In April 2013, the Company acquired 51% of the outstanding stock of eMDT, a private company, for
$400,000. The Company has an option to acquire an additional 25% of the Company for $200,000. In connection
with the acquisition, the Company has preliminarily allocated excess purchase price in the amount of
approximately $400,000 to goodwill. The Company’s has finalized the purchase accounting.
The results of operations of the eMDT acquisition have been included in the consolidated statements of
operations from the time the Company assumed majority ownership, approximately April 17, 2013. eMDT’s net
loss from operations included in the consolidated results of operation for the year ended December 28, 2013 was
$0.3 million. The transaction related costs associated with the eMDT acquisition were considered immaterial and
are included within selling, general and administrative expense for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2013. The
goodwill will not be deductible for tax purposes.
The unaudited pro forma financial results for the fiscal years ended December 28, 2013 and December 29,
2012 combine the unaudited historical results of the Company along with the unaudited historical results of
Ikanos and eMDT. The results include the effects of unaudited pro forma adjustments as if Ikanos and eMDT
were acquired on January 1, 2012 (the first day of the Company’s fiscal year 2012). There were no material
nonrecurring pro forma adjustments in the calculation of revenue or earnings. The pro forma financial results
presented below do not include any anticipated synergies or other expected benefits of the acquisition. These
results are presented for informational purposes only and are not necessarily indicative of future operations.
Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net Loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$23,103,000
(4,670,000)
$ 36,142,000
(18,805,000)
Twelve Months Ended
December 28,
2013
December 29,
2012
6. Goodwill and Intangibles
The Company’s goodwill balance is as follows:
Beginning Balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition of Ikanos . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition of eMDT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Translation adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fiscal Year Ended
December 28,
2013
December 29,
2012
$ 684,789
—
395,713
(64,370)
—
$ 1,664,457
684,789
—
(1,704,770)
40,313
Ending Balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$1,016,132
$
684,789
The Company performs impairment tests of goodwill at its reporting unit level. The Company conducts its
annual goodwill impairment test on the last day of each fiscal year unless factors indicate that an impairment may
have occurred. As of December 28, 2013, the Company performed a qualitative analysis in determining no
impairment of the Company’s goodwill was indicated. Goodwill is included in the Kopin reportable segment.
At December 28, 2013, the Company performed a review of the FDD intangibles assets and determined that
the customer relationships, technology and trademarks were impaired. The Company performed a remeasurement
65
KOPIN CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
of the fair value of the intangible assets using the income approach and as a result the Company wrote down the
value of the intangible assets by $1.2 million in the year ended December 28, 2013. At December 28, 2013, the
Company determined that as a result of a change in the strategic direction of Ikanos the value of its customer
relationships were impaired and the Company wrote down the value of the intangible assets by $0.3 million.
During the twelve month period ended June 30, 2012, the Company determined that FDD was not achieving
the operating results identified in the model that was used to determine the goodwill impairment at December 31,
2011. The Company performed the goodwill impairment test discussed below and determined that the remaining
goodwill was impaired and accordingly the Company recorded a $1.7 million goodwill impairment charge in the
year ended December 29, 2012. The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test on Ikanos goodwill
using the income approach. At December 29, 2012, no impairment of Ikanos goodwill was indicated.
On December 31, 2011, the Company performed an impairment analysis of its finite-lived intangible assets
based on a comparison of the undiscounted cash flows to the recorded carrying value of the intangible assets. As
of December 31, 2011, it was determined that the carrying values of the finite-lived intangible assets exceeded
their fair values and the Company recorded impairments of $1.5 million related to customer relationships, $0.4
million related to developed technology, and $57,000 related to trademark portfolio during the year ended
December 29, 2012.
After completing its finite-lived intangible asset impairment test, the Company completed its impairment
analysis of the goodwill derived from the FDD acquisition and determined the goodwill was impaired. The
Company’s impairment analysis for goodwill consisted of comparing the implied fair value of goodwill to its
carrying value as of December 31, 2011. Based on this analysis, during the year ended December 31, 2011, the
Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $3.0 million, as of and for the year ended December 31,
2011.
The discount rate used was the value-weighted average of the Company’s estimated cost of equity and debt
(“cost of capital”) derived using both known and estimated customary market metrics.
The identified intangible assets will be amortized on a straight-line basis over the following lives:
Customer relationships . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Developed technology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trademark portfolio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Years
7
7
7
The Company recognized $0.3 million in amortization for the fiscal years ended December 28, 2013 and
December 29, 2012, respectively, and $0.7 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, related to its
intangible assets. The estimated aggregate annual amortization expense relating to acquired intangible assets is as
follows.
Fiscal Year ending,
2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thereafter
Amount
$ 711,324
710,422
94,266
21,830
21,830
21,830
Total annual amortization expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$1,581,502
66
KOPIN CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
7. Financial Instruments
Fair Value Measurements
Under accounting guidance, financial instruments are categorized as Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 based upon
the method by which their fair value is computed. An investment is categorized as Level 1 when its fair value is
based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets that the Company has the ability to
access at the measurement date. An investment is categorized as Level 2 if its fair market value is based on
quoted market prices for similar assets in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets
that are not active, based on observable inputs such as interest rates, yield curves, or derived from or
corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means. An investment is categorized as Level 3 if
its fair value is based on assumptions developed by the Company about what a market participant would use in
pricing the assets.
The Company’s investments are either held by brokers or in the case of publicly-held corporation, by the
Company. The brokers who hold the Company’s investments provide periodic reporting on both the cost and fair
value of the securities. The Company performs various procedures to corroborate the fair value provided by the
brokers. Debt securities reflected in the table below include investments such as certificates of deposit,
commercial paper, corporate bonds, government bonds, and money market fund deposits. When the Company
uses observable market prices for identical securities that are traded in less active markets, its debt investments
are classified as Level 2. When observable market prices for identical securities are not available, the Company
prices our debt investments using non-binding market consensus prices that are corroborated with observable
market data; quoted market prices for similar instruments; or pricing models, such as a discounted cash flow
model, with all significant inputs derived from or corroborated with observable market data. Non-binding market
consensus prices are based on quotes from brokers. The discounted cash flow model uses observable market
inputs, such as US treasury-based yield curves.
The following table details the fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy of the Company’s
financial assets:
Fair Value Measurement at December 28, 2013 Using:
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Money Markets and Cash Equivalents . . . . . . .
U.S. Government Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate Debt
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Certificates of Deposit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vuzix Corporation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 16,756,666
68,284,392
12,984,331
14,703,812
1,433,102
$16,756,666
16,542,003
—
—
1,433,102
$
—
51,742,389
12,984,331
14,703,812
—
$114,162,303
$34,731,771
$79,430,532
$—
—
—
—
—
$—
Fair Value Measurement at December 29, 2012 Using:
Total
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Money Markets and Cash Equivalents . . . . . . . .
U.S. Government Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate Debt
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Certificates of Deposit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
WIN Semiconductor Corp.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Advanced Wireless Semiconductor Company . .
$27,135,387
38,582,956
11,095,227
15,671,779
1,410,388
1,764,657
$27,135,387
17,576,878
—
—
1,410,388
1,764,657
$
—
21,006,078
11,095,227
15,671,779
—
—
$95,660,394
$47,887,310
$47,773,084
$—
—
—
—
—
—
$—
67
KOPIN CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The corporate debt consists of floating rate notes with a maturity that is over multiple years but has interest
rates which are reset every three months based on the then current three month London Interbank Offering Rate
(3 month Libor). The Company determines the fair market values of these corporate debt instruments through the
use of a model which incorporates the 3 month Libor, the credit default swap rate of the issuer and the bid and
ask price spread of same or similar investments which are traded on several markets.
The carrying amounts of cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities
approximate fair value because of their short term nature. The carrying amount of accrued liabilities is classified
as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.
Marketable Debt Securities
Investments in available-for-sale marketable debt securities are as follows at December 28, 2013 and
December 29, 2012:
U.S. government and
agency backed
securities . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate debt and
certificates of
deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortized Cost
Unrealized Gains
Unrealized Losses
Fair Value
2013
2012
2013
2012
2013
2012
2013
2012
$68,970,505
$38,074,136
$—
$508,820
$(686,113) $
— $68,284,392
$38,582,956
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$96,738,018
$65,106,002
27,767,513
27,031,866
—
$—
—
(79,370)
(264,860)
27,688,143
26,767,006
$508,820
$(765,483) $(264,860) $95,972,535
$65,349,962
The contractual maturity of the Company’s marketable debt securities is as follows at December 28, 2013:
U.S. government and agency backed securities . . . . .
Corporate debt and certificates of deposits . . . . . . . . .
$12,207,098
22,768,523
$44,260,888
3,919,620
$11,816,406
1,000,000
$68,284,392
27,688,143
Total
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$34,975,621
$48,180,508
$12,816,406
$95,972,535
Less than
One year
One to
Five years
Greater than
Five years
Total
Other-than-Temporary Impairments
The Company reviews its marketable debt securities on a quarterly basis for the presence of other-than-
temporary impairment (OTTI).
If the Company determines that an OTTI has occurred it further estimates the amount of OTTI resulting
from a decline in the credit worthiness of the issuer (credit-related OTTI) and the amount of non credit-related
OTTI. Noncredit-related OTTI can be caused by such factors as market illiquidity. Credit-related OTTI is
recognized in earnings while noncredit-related OTTI on securities not expected to be sold is recognized in other
comprehensive income (OCI). The Company did not record any OTTI for the fiscal years 2013 and 2012.
Included in other income and expense is an impairment charge on investments in corporate debt instruments of
$0.2 million for fiscal year 2011.
68
KOPIN CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
8. Stockholders’ Equity and Stock-Based Compensation
In March 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $30 million of the
Company’s common stock in open market or negotiated transactions through March 2014. Since the plan’s
inception through December 28, 2013, the Company has purchased 2,171,400 shares of its common stock for
$7,991,954.
The Company has stock-based awards outstanding under several plans. In 2001, the Company adopted a
2001 Equity Incentive Plan (the Equity Plan). The Equity Plan authorized 7,100,000 shares of common stock, to
be issued to employees, non-employees, and members of the Board of Directors (the Board). The Equity Plan
had a ten year life and therefore no new equity awards may be issued under this plan. In 2010, the Company
adopted a 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2010 Equity Plan) which authorized the issuance of shares of common
stock to employees, non-employees, and the Board. The 2010 Equity Plan has been subsequently amended to
increase the number of authorized shares. The number of shares authorized is 2,600,000 plus the number of
shares of common stock which were available for grant under the Equity Plan, the number of shares of common
stock which were the subject of awards outstanding under the Equity Plan and are forfeited, terminated, canceled
or expire after the adoption of the 2010 Equity Plan and the number of shares of common stock delivered to the
Company either in exercise of a Equity Plan award or in satisfaction of a tax withholding obligation. The option
price of statutory incentive stock options shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the stock at the
date of grant, or in the case of certain statutory incentive stock options, at 110% of the fair market value at the
time of the grant. The option price of nonqualified stock options is determined by the Board or Compensation
Committee. Options must be exercised within a ten-year period or sooner if so specified within the option
agreement. The term and vesting period for restricted stock awards and options granted under the 2010 Equity
Plan are determined by the Board’s compensation committee.
The Company has approximately 1.2 million shares of common stock available for issuance under the
Company’s 2010 Equity Plan in excess of shares of common stock which have already been reserved for under
previously issued equity awards.
Stock Options
A summary of stock option activity under the stock award plans as of December 28, 2013 and changes
during the twelve month period is as follows:
Balance, beginning of year
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Options forfeited/canceled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Options exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013
Shares
983,680
(424,830)
—
Balance, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
558,850
Exercisable, end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
558,850
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
$5.26
5.48
—
$5.09
69
KOPIN CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at
December 28, 2013:
Range of Exercise Prices
$ 0.01—$ 3.50 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 3.75—$ 4.82 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 5.00—$ 8.03 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$10.00—$10.00 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Options Outstanding
Options Exercisable
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (Years)
2.00
1.00
2.23
1.00
1.23
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
$ 3.49
4.23
5.40
10.00
$ 5.09
Number
Exercisable
130,000
328,850
—
100,000
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
$ 3.49
4.23
5.40
10.00
558,850
$ 5.09
Number
Outstanding
130,000
328,850
—
100,000
558,850
Aggregate intrinsic value on December 28, 2013 . . . .
$182,643
$182,643
No stock options were issued in 2013, 2012 or 2011. The intrinsic value of options exercised in 2013, 2012
and 2011 was approximately $0, $0 and $23,000, respectively. The Company has issued warrants to purchase
200,000 shares of the Company’s stock at $3.49. During the year ended December 29, 2012, the warrants became
fully vested.
Cash received from option exercises under all share-based payment arrangements was approximately $0.1
million for fiscal year 2011. No tax benefits were realized during the three year period ended 2013 due to the
existence of tax net operating loss carryforwards.
NonVested Restricted Common Stock
The Company has issued shares of nonvested restricted common stock to certain employees. Each award
requires the employee to fulfill certain obligations, including remaining employed by the Company for one, two
or four years (the vesting period) and in certain cases also meeting performance criteria. A summary of the
activity for nonvested restricted common stock awards as of December 28, 2013 and changes during the twelve
months then ended is presented below:
Balance, December 29, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shares
2,283,048
2,135,000
(227,000)
(1,216,900)
Balance, December 28, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2,974,148
Weighted
Average
Grant
Fair Value
$4.76
3.22
3.87
3.46
$4.25
The forfeitures in 2013 were primarily due to fact that the performance criteria were not met related to these
awards.
70
KOPIN CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Stock-Based Compensation
The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock options and
nonvested restricted common stock awards for the fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011 (no tax benefits were
recognized):
Cost of product revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research and development
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selling, general and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 414,842
423,548
3,365,018
$ 513,789
366,443
3,606,758
$ 613,274
577,514
2,732,840
Total
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$4,203,408
$4,486,990
$3,923,628
2013
2012
2011
Total unrecognized compensation expense for the nonvested restricted common stock as of December 28,
2013 totals $6.2 million and is expected to be recognized over a period of two years.
9. Concentrations of Risk
Ongoing credit evaluations of customers’ financial condition are performed and collateral, such as letters of
credit, are generally not required. The following table depicts the customer’s trade receivable balance as a
percentage of gross trade receivables as of the end of the year indicated. (The symbol “*” indicates that accounts
receivables from that customer were less than 10% of the Company’s total accounts receivable.)
Customer
Percent of Gross
Accounts Receivable
2013
2012
Company A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Company B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Company C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Company D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Company E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
22
12
12
*
*
*
*
*
37
12
Sales to significant non-affiliated customers for fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011, as a percentage of total
revenues, is shown in the table below. Note the caption “Military Customers in Total” in the table below
excludes research and development contracts. The Company sells its displays to Japanese customers through
Ryoden Trading Company. (The symbol “*” indicates that sales to that customer were less than 10% of the
Company’s total revenues.)
Customer
Sales as a Percent
of Total Revenue
Fiscal Year
2013
2012
2011
Military Customers in Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Company A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Company D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Company E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Company F . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
United States Government Funded Research and Development
Contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
38
18
13
*
*
7
57
12
22
21
*
10
60
15
23
18
10
8
71
KOPIN CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
10.
Income Taxes
The (benefit) provision for income taxes from continuing operations consists of the following for the fiscal
years indicated:
Current
2013
Fiscal Year
2012
2011
Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total current (benefit) provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred
Federal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$(13,124,000) $
— $
12,000
(34,000)
(13,146,000)
64,000
—
64,000
52,000
88,000
(137,000)
3,000
(3,616,000)
644,000
(565,000)
3,750,000
(2,878,000)
(505,000)
73,000
4,345,000
3,977,000
(30,000)
(898,000)
(3,052,000)
Total deferred provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
213,000
1,035,000
(3,000)
Total (benefit) provision for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$(12,933,000) $ 1,099,000
$
—
Net operating losses utilized in 2013, 2012 and 2011 to offset federal and state taxes were $0, $0 and
$2,698,000, respectively.
The actual income tax provision (benefit) reported from operations are different than those which would
have been computed by applying the federal statutory tax rate to loss before income tax benefit. A reconciliation
of income tax (benefit) provision from continuing operations as computed at the U.S. federal statutory income
tax rate to the provision for income tax benefit is as follows:
2013
Fiscal Year
2012
2011
Tax provision at federal statutory rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State tax liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign deferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign withholding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Outside basis in KTC and Kowon, net
Goodwill
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Nondeductible expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increase in net state operating loss carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision to tax return adjustments and state tax rate change . . . . . .
Tax credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-deductible equity compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
8,000
(644,000)
308,000
(202,000)
42,000
734,000
1,170,000
2,422,000
417,000
180,000
—
$(13,322,000) $(7,002,000) $(2,006,000)
57,000
611,000
—
—
771,000
415,000
—
888,000
1,188,000
1,542,000
(414,000)
(3,052,000)
864,000
(2,868,000)
(33,000)
(390,000)
(418,000)
14,000
3,750,000
(462,000)
(100,000)
136,000
(783,000)
4,345,000
$(12,933,000) $ 1,099,000
$
—
Pretax foreign losses from continuing operations were approximately $(4,966,000), $(6,870,000) and
$(6,879,000) for fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Company has made the decision to close
Kowon and accordingly reflected a liability for unremitted earnings.
72
KOPIN CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The benefit for income taxes for the fiscal year ended 2013 of $12.9 million represents the net of state and
foreign tax and intra period tax allocations related to the Company’s discontinued operations and withholding
taxes related to ceasing operations at the Korean facility.
Deferred income taxes are provided to recognize the effect of temporary differences between tax and
financial reporting. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities consist of the following:
Fiscal Year
2013
2012
Deferred tax liability:
Intangible asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign withholding liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign unremitted earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
(141,000)
(1,478,000)
(3,276,000)
$
(636,000)
(1,170,000)
(3,478,000)
Deferred tax assets:
Federal net operating loss carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State net operating loss carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign net operating loss carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15,322,000
624,000
3,202,000
1,666,000
5,657,000
838,000
4,594,000
3,365,000
9,493,000
580,000
3,028,000
1,111,000
5,267,000
4,131,000
4,760,000
3,582,000
Net deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
30,373,000
(31,886,000)
26,668,000
(27,973,000)
$ (1,513,000)
$ (1,305,000)
As of December 28, 2013, the Company has available for tax purposes federal net operating loss
carryforwards (NOLs) of $43.7 million expiring through 2032. The Company has recognized a full valuation
allowance on its net deferred tax assets as the Company has concluded that such assets are not more likely than
not to be realized. The $3.7 million increase in valuation allowance during fiscal year 2013 was primarily due to
net operating losses generated of $8.6 million and the sale of III-V assets. The change in valuation allowance
during fiscal year 2012 was due to net operating losses generated of $6.0 million and significant equipment
disposals of $2.0 million. The Company has not historically recorded, nor does it intend to record the tax benefits
from stock awards until realized. Unrecorded benefits from stock awards approximated $10.1 million at
December 28, 2013.
The Company has suspended operations and terminated the majority of employees at its Korean subsidiary,
Kowon. The assets, primarily buildings and land, have been put up for sale. It is more likely than not that the
Company’s share of the net book value of its Korean investment would be repatriated to the U.S. resulting in a
Korean withholding tax of $1.5 million. As a result of the Company no longer being permanently reinvested in
Korea, a deferred tax liability for the outside basis in the Korean subsidiary has been booked for $3.3 million.
In September 2013, the U.S. Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service released final
regulations relating to guidance on applying tax rules to amounts paid to acquire, produce or improve tangible
personal property as well as rules for materials and supplies. The Company is currently assessing these rules and
the impacts to the financial statements, if any.
73
KOPIN CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
The Company’s income tax returns have not been examined by the Internal Revenue Service and are subject
to examination for all years since 2001. State income tax returns are generally subject to examination for a period
of three to five years after filing of the respective return. The state impact of any federal changes remains subject
to examination by various states for a period of up to one year after formal notification to the states.
International jurisdictions have statutes of limitations generally ranging from three to seven years after filing
of the respective return. Years still open to examination by tax authorities in major jurisdictions include Korea
(2006 onward), Japan (2006 onward), Hong Kong (2008 onward) and United Kingdom (2011 onward). The
Company is not currently under examination in these jurisdictions.
11. Accrued Warranty
The Company warrants its products against defect for 12 months. A provision for estimated future costs and
estimated returns for credit relating to warranty is recorded in the period when product is shipped and revenue
recognized, and is updated as additional information becomes available. The Company’s estimate of future costs
to satisfy warranty obligations is based primarily on historical warranty expense experienced and a provision for
potential future product failures. Changes in the accrued warranty for fiscal years 2013 and 2012 are as follows:
Fiscal Year Ended
December 28,
2013
December 29,
2012
Beginning Balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Claim and reversals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reclassified to current liabilities held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 716,000
798,000
(798,000)
—
$ 1,318,000
1,777,000
(2,229,000)
(150,000)
Ending Balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 716,000
$
716,000
12. Employee Benefit Plan
The Company has an employee benefit plan pursuant to Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended. In 2013, the plan allowed employees to defer an amount of their annual compensation up to a
current maximum of $17,000 if they are under the age of 50 and $22,500 if they are over the age of 50. The
Company matches 50% of all deferred compensation on the first 3% of each employee’s deferred compensation.
The amount charged to operations in connection with this plan was approximately $146,000, $210,000 and
$229,000 in fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
74
KOPIN CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
13. Commitments and Contingencies
Leases
The Company leases facilities located in Westborough, Massachusetts, Santa Clara, California, Scotts
Valley, California, Dalgety Bay, Scotland and Nottingham, United Kingdom, under non-cancelable operating
leases. The Westborough lease expires in 2023. The Santa Clara lease expires in 2016. The Scotts Valley lease
expires in November 2014. The Dalgety Bay lease expires in 2016. The Company also leases two facilities in
Nottingham, United Kingdom which expire in 2016 and 2017. Substantially all real estate taxes, insurance and
maintenance expenses under these leases are the Company’s obligations and are expensed as incurred and were
immaterial. The following is a schedule of minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases
at December 28, 2013:
Fiscal Year ending,
2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thereafter
Amount
$1,266,000
1,177,000
836,000
665,000
641,000
2,768,000
Total minimum lease payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$7,353,000
Amounts incurred under operating leases are recorded as rent expense on a straight-line basis and
aggregated approximately $1.3 million in fiscal year 2013, $0.8 million in fiscal year 2012 and $1.1 million in
fiscal year 2011.
Other Agreements
The Company has entered into various license agreements which require payment of royalties based upon a
set percentage of product sales, subject in some cases, to certain minimum amounts. Total royalty expense
approximated $20,000, $18,000 and $18,000, respectively, in fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011.
The Company received a $3.0 million grant in fiscal year 2008 from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as an incentive to retain jobs in Massachusetts. As a result of the sale of the III-V product line the Company
repaid all of such amounts to the state in 2013.
14. Litigation
The Company may engage in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Claims, suits,
investigations and proceedings are inherently uncertain and it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of
such matters and our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows could be affected in any
particular period.
15. Segments and Geographical Information
The Company’s chief operating decision maker is its Chief Executive Officer. During the year ended
December 28, 2013, the Company transferred the manufacturing operations of Kowon to the Company’s
manufacturing facility in the United States and sold its III-V product line including its investment in KTC. As a
result of these transactions, the Company has reorganized its operations to align with its new strategy to primarily
75
KOPIN CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
focus on developing its wearable computing systems and its reflective display products. Accordingly, the
Company has determined it has two reportable segments, FDD, the manufacturer of its reflective display
products for test and simulation products, and Kopin, which is comprised of Kopin Corporation, Kowon, Ikanos
and eMDT. The segment information for the prior periods presented has been recast to reflect the change in
reportable segments.
Kopin
FDD
Total
2013
Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net loss attributable to the controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-lived assets from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 19,883
(2,003)
143,953
5,488
$ 3,014
(2,707)
2,179
547
$ 22,898
(4,710)
146,132
6,035
2012
Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net loss attributable to the controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-lived assets from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 31,879
(17,067)
134,375
7,728
$ 2,763
(4,083)
4,202
758
$ 34,642
(21,150)
138,577
8,486
2011
Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) attributable to the controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-lived assets from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ 59,785
244
187,215
31,331
$ 4,874
(6,878)
6,657
1,038
$ 64,659
(6,634)
193,872
32,369
Geographical revenue information for the three years ended December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012 and
December 31, 2011 was based on the location of the customers and is as follows:
2013
Fiscal Year
2012
2011
Revenue
% of Total
Revenue
% of Total
Revenue
% of Total
US . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other Americas . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$11,927,000
230,000
53% $25,356,000
93,000
1%
73% $48,707,000
632,000
—%
Total Americas . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
12,157,000
Asia-Pacific . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8,292,000
2,449,000
54%
36%
10%
25,449,000
7,132,000
2,061,000
73%
21%
6%
49,339,000
12,300,000
3,020,000
75%
1%
76%
19%
5%
Total Revenues . . . . . . . . . .
$22,898,000
100% $34,642,000
100% $64,659,000
100%
Long-lived assets by geographic area are as follows:
United States of America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
United Kingdom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Republic of Korea . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$3,050,000
795,000
2,190,000
$4,840,000
1,072,000
2,574,000
$6,035,000
$8,486,000
Fiscal Years
2013
2012
76
KOPIN CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
16. Selected Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
The following tables present Kopin’s quarterly operating results for the fiscal years ended December 28,
2013 and December 29, 2012. The information for each of these quarters is unaudited and has been prepared on
the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all necessary
adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, have been included to present fairly the unaudited
consolidated quarterly results when read in conjunction with Kopin’s audited consolidated financial statements
and related notes. These operating results are not necessarily indicative of the results of any future period.
Quarterly Periods During Fiscal Year Ended December 28, 2013:
Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross profit (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income (loss) from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) attributable to the controlling
interest
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net income (loss) per share from continuing operations
(1):
Three months
ended
March 30,
2013
Three months
ended
June 29,
2013
Three months
ended
September 28,
2013
Three months
ended
December 28,
2013 (3)
(In thousands, except per share data)
$ 6,319
$ (396)
$ 1,168
$ 6,079
$ (595)
$ (8,062)
$ 4,950
$
267
$ (9,015)
$ 5,550
$
645
$ (9,844)
$21,634
$ (7,910)
$ (8,771)
$ (9,660)
Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$
$
0.34
0.34
$ (0.13)
$ (0.13)
$ (0.14)
$ (0.14)
$ (0.16)
$ (0.16)
Shares used in computing net loss per share from
continuing operations:
Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
63,936
63,936
62,492
62,492
63,542
63,542
61,529
61,529
(1) Net income (loss) per share is computed independently for each of the quarters presented; accordingly, the
sum of the quarterly net income per share may not equal the total computed for the year.
(2) Gross profit is defined as net product revenue less cost of product revenues.
(3)
Includes $4.0 million impact in loss from continuing operations and net loss attributable to the controlling
interest attributable to the impairment of intangibles and write off of investments for the three month period
ended December 28, 2013, as described in Notes 4 and 6.
77
KOPIN CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
Quarterly Periods During Fiscal Year Ended December 29, 2012:
Three months
ended
March 31,
2012
Three months
ended
June 30,
2012
Three months
ended
September 29,
2012
Three months
ended
December 29,
2012
(In thousands, except per share data)
Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross profit (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net loss attributable to the controlling interest . . . . . . .
Net loss per share from continuing operations (1):
$10,866
$ 3,253
$ (2,712)
$ (2,578)
$ 7,012
$ 1,127
$ (6,456)
$ (5,199)
Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$ (0.04)
$ (0.04)
$ (0.08)
$ (0.08)
$ 8,190
$ 2,451
$ (6,849)
$ (6,724)
$ (0.11)
$ (0.11)
$ 8,574
$ 2,425
$ (5,766)
$ (3,861)
$ (0.06)
$ (0.06)
Shares used in computing net loss per share from
continuing operations:
Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
64,225
64,225
63,078
63,078
63,415
63,415
63,836
63,836
(1) Net loss per share is computed independently for each of the quarters presented; accordingly, the sum of the
quarterly net income per share may not equal the total computed for the year.
(2) Gross profit is defined as net product revenue less cost of product revenues.
78
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
March 17, 2014
KOPIN CORPORATION
By:
/s/
JOHN C.C. FAN
John C.C. Fan
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer,
President and Director
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by
the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
Title
Date
/s/
JOHN C.C. FAN
John C.C. Fan
/s/
JAMES BREWINGTON
James Brewington
/s/ DAVID E. BROOK
David E. Brook
/s/ MORTON COLLINS
Morton Collins
Chairman of the Board, Chief
March 17, 2014
Executive Officer, President and
Director (Principal Executive
Officer)
Director
Director
Director
March 17, 2014
March 17, 2014
March 17, 2014
/s/ ANDREW H. CHAPMAN
Director
March 17, 2014
Andrew H. Chapman
Chi Chia Hsieh
Director
March 17, 2014
/s/ MICHAEL J. LANDINE
Director
March 17, 2014
Michael J. Landine
/s/ RICHARD A. SNEIDER
Treasurer and Chief Financial
March 17, 2014
Richard A. Sneider
Officer (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)
79
KOPIN CORPORATION
SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
Fiscal Years Ended December 28, 2013, December 29, 2012 and December 31, 2011
Description
Balance at
Beginning
of Year
Additions
Charged
to
Income
Deductions
from
Reserve
Balance at
End of
Year
Reserve deducted from assets—allowance for doubtful accounts:
2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$737,000
513,000
311,000
$182,000
139,000
19,000
$(406,000) $513,000
311,000
(341,000)
202,000
(128,000)
80
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Sequential
page number
(2)
(5)
(5)
(8)
(1)
(1)
(7)*
(9)*
(10)*
(11)*
(13)*
(6)*
(1)*
(1)
(3)
(4)
(16)
(12)*
(12)*
*
(15)
(17)
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation
Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation
Fourth Amended and Restated By-laws
Specimen Certificate of Common Stock
Form of Employee Agreement with Respect to Inventions and Proprietary
Information
Kopin Corporation 2001 Equity Incentive Plan
Kopin Corporation 2001 Equity Incentive Plan Amendment
Kopin Corporation 2001 Equity Incentive Plan Amendment
Kopin Corporation 2001 Equity Incentive Plan Amendment
Kopin Corporation 2001 Equity Incentive Plan Amendment
Kopin Corporation 2001 Supplemental Equity Incentive Plan
Form of Key Employee Stock Purchase Agreement
License Agreement by and between the Company and Massachusetts Institute of
Technology dated April 22, 1985, as amended
Facility Lease, by and between the Company and Massachusetts Technology Park
Corporation, dated October 15, 1993
Joint Venture Agreement, by and among the Company, Kowon Technology Co.,
Ltd., and Korean Investors, dated as of March 3, 1998
Seventh Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and
Dr. John C.C. Fan, dated as of December 8, 2010
Kopin Corporation Form of Stock Option Agreement under 2001 and 2010 Equity
Incentive Plans
Kopin Corporation 2001 and 2010 Equity Incentive Plan Form of Restricted Stock
Purchase Agreement
Kopin Corporation Fiscal Year 2012 Incentive Bonus Plan
Kopin Corporation 2010 Equity Incentive Plan
Purchase Agreement, dated January 10, 2013, by and among Kopin Corporation,
IQE KC, LLC and IQE plc
Subsidiaries of Kopin Corporation
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibits
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
4
10.1
10.5
10.6
10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11
10.12
10.13
10.14
10.15
10.16
10.17
10.18
10.20
10.21
21.1
23.1
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
81
Exhibits
101
The following materials from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 29, 2012, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business
Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements
of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss), (iv)
Consolidated Statements of Stockholder’s Equity, (v) Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows, and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks
of text
Sequential
page number
* Management contract or compensatory plan required to be filed as an Exhibit to this Form 10-K.
**
This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by
reference in any filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in
any filing.
Filed as an exhibit to Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 33-45853, and incorporated herein
by reference.
Filed as an exhibit to Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 33-57450, and incorporated herein
by reference.
Filed as an exhibit to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993 and
incorporated herein by reference.
Filed as an exhibit to Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 27, 1998 and
incorporated herein by reference.
Filed as an exhibit to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 1, 2000 and
incorporated herein by reference.
Filed as an exhibit to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 1, 2000 and
incorporated herein by reference.
Filed as an appendix to Proxy Statement filed on April 20, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference.
Filed as an exhibit to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 12, 2008 and incorporated herein
by reference.
Filed as an exhibit to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 12, 2008 and incorporated herein
by reference.
Filed as an exhibit to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on March 15, 2004 and incorporated
herein by reference.
Filed as an exhibit to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on May 10, 2004 and incorporated herein
by reference.
Filed as an exhibit to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2004 and
incorporated herein by reference.
Filed as an exhibit to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on April 15, 2008 and incorporated
herein by reference.
Filed as an exhibit to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 26, 2009 and
incorporated by reference herein.
Filed with the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14 filed as of April 5, 2013 and
incorporated by reference herein.
Filed as an exhibit to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2010 and
incorporated by reference herein.
Filed as an exhibit to Current Report on Form 8-K on January 10, 2013 and incorporated by reference
herein.
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
82
Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
Legal Counsel
Bingham McCutchen LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
Chu, Ring & Hazel, LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
Patent Counsel
Hamilton, Brook, Smith & Reynolds
Concord, Massachusetts
“Kopin,” the KOPIN logo, “CyberDis-
play,” “DIGITAL iVISION,”
“CyberEVF,” “BDM,” “Pupil,” “Ruby,”
“Powered by Kopin,” “The Na-no
Semiconducter Company,” “Forth
Dimensions Displays” and “Golden-i”
are trademarks and service marks of
Kopin Corporation. Other product,
company or organization names
cited in this annual report may be
trademarks or registered trademarks
of their respective companies or
organizations.
Shareholder Information
Corporate Headquarters
Kopin Corporation
125 North Drive
Westborough, Massachusetts 01581
Phone: (508) 870-5959
Fax: (508) 870-0660
Display Manufacturing
Westborough, Massachusetts
Kyunggi-Do, South Korea
Dalgety Bay, Fife, Scotland
Display Design Center
Scotts Valley, California
Software Development
Nottingham, England
Wearable Tech Center
Santa Clara, California
Common Stock
Kopin Corporation common stock is traded on the Nasdaq
Stock Market under the symbol KOPN
Corporate and Investor Information
Financial analysts, stockholders, interested investors and the
financial media requesting a copy of the Company’s 10-K filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or other
information, should contact Richard Sneider, CFO, at (508)
870-5959.
Transfer Agent & Registrar
Correspondence concerning transfer requirements and lost
certificates should be addressed to the transfer agent:
Computershare Trust Company, N.A.
P.O. Box 43078
Providence, Rhode Island 02940-3010
(800) 962-4284
Annual Meeting
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company will be
held at 9:00 a.m. (ET) Tuesday, April 29, 2014 at Bingham
McCutchen LLP, One Federal Street, Boston, Massachusetts.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
James K. Brewington (3)
J. K. Brewington Business
Development
Andrew H. Chapman (1)(2)
Private Investor
John C.C. Fan
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of the Board,
Kopin Corporation
David E. Brook
Founder and Senior Partner,
Hamilton, Brook, Smith & Reynolds
Morton Collins (1)(2)
General Partner, Battelle Ventures
Michael J. Landine (1)(3)
Vice President of Corporate Development,
Alkermes, Inc.
Chi Chia Hsieh (3)
Vice Chairman,
Microelectronics Technology, Inc.
(1) Member of Audit Committee
(2) Member of Compensation Committee
(3) Member of Nominating and Corporate
Governance Committee
CORPORATE OFFICERS
John C.C. Fan
President, Chief Executive Officer
and Chairman of the Board
Bor Yeu Tsaur
Executive Vice President,
Display Operations
Michael Presz
Vice President, Government Programs and
Special Projects
Richard A. Sneider
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
Hong K. Choi
Chief Technology Officer
Annual Report Design by Curran & Connors, Inc. / www.curran-connors.com
125 North Drive
Westborough, MA 01581
www.kopin.com