Quarterlytics / Technology / Consumer Electronics / Kopin Corporation

Kopin Corporation

kopn · NASDAQ Technology
Claim this profile
Ticker kopn
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Technology
Industry Consumer Electronics
Employees 181
← All annual reports
FY2016 Annual Report · Kopin Corporation
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
KOPIN CORPORATION

COMPONENTS AND SYSTEMS
FOR WEARABLE, AUGMENTED REALIT Y AND VIRTUAL REALIT Y HEADSETS

2016 ANNUAL REPORT

A LEADER IN COMPONENTS AND SYSTEMS  
FOR THE WEARABLE HEADSET MARKET

Kopin offers specialized components and systems to meet the challenging requirements of head-worn 
wearables: high-performance sunlight readable micro-displays, optics, backlights, and audio chips for 
a wide variety of applications and use environments.

Consumer

For  consumer  products  Kopin  offers  a  wide  range  of  LCD  displays  called  CyberDisplays®
with a variety of resolutions, back lights and optics individually and in modules for use 
in  augmented  and  virtual  reality  headsets  and  other  consumer  products.  In  2016 
Kopin introduced its Lightning™ OLED micro display, with 2K x 2K resolution, low 
power, small form factor and fast frame rate for minimal latency. The Lightning OLED 
solves many of the issues with today’s virtual reality headsets. Kopin is an industry 
leader selling over 30 million micro displays world-wide to customers such a Samsung, 
JVC, and Oriscape.

Military

Kopin has a long history of developing leading edge products for military applications. 
Our original display development funding came from DARPA. Our displays are used 
in  a  number  of  applications  including  avionic  helmets,  thermal  weapon  sights,  and 
crew  based  systems.  Currently  we  are  shipping  units  for  the  initial  phases  of  the 
Family of Weapon Sight (FWS) program, the successor to the Thermal Weapon Sight 
(TWS)  program,  and  the  F-35  Strike  Fighter  avionic  helmet,  an  advanced 
augmented  reality  system.  The  military  procures  individual  displays  or  Higher  Level 
Assemblies (HLA) which includes a display, specialized optics, and electronics com-
bined  in  a  hermetically  sealed  housing.  Our  success  in  winning  military  programs  is 
based  on  our  technology  leadership  and  high  quality  manufacturing.  Our  military 
customers include, Raytheon, DRS technologies, BAE Systems and Rockwell Collins.

Enterprise

We offer for sale our proprietary components and license our wearable headset refer-
ence  designs  for  use  in  health  care,  public  safety,  distribution  and  manufacturing. 
Using our proprietary displays our wearable enterprise headset designs allow users to 
access  data  from  schematics  and  drawings,  work  instructions,  manuals  and  similar 
information sources over the internet. For difficult issues the headsets have a camera 
to enable real-time streaming video so that the user can contact a “remote expert” to 
collaboratively solve problems. Our headset designs are voice controlled to enable the 
user to use their hands. We achieve this using our Whisper™ audio chip which uses 
our proprietary VEF (Voice Extraction Filter) technology to provide a clear voice signal in 
noisy  environments.  Our  enterprise  customers  include  Scott  Safety,  Fujitsu  and 
Google.

KOPIN WEARABLE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT STARTED WITH $50 MILLION IN 

FUNDING FROM DARPA—PIONEERING THE WAY FOR WEARABLES. TODAY KOPIN 

OFFERS  CRITICAL,  SPECIALIZED  NON-COMMODITY  COMPONENTS,  REFERENCE 

DESIGNS  AND  SYSTEMS  FOR  THE  WEARABLE  SECOND  SCREEN,  AUGMENTED 

REALITY (AR) AND VIRTUAL REALITY (VR) HEADSET MARKET. KOPIN’S PRODUCTS 

ARE  FEATURED  IN  MILITARY,  ENTERPRISE  AND  CONSUMER  HEADSETS.  THE 

APPLICATIONS RANGE FROM THE MOST ADVANCED AVIONIC HELMETS TO REPAIR 

AND  MAINTENANCE  HEADSETS  TO  IMMERSIVE  FIRST  PERSON  VIEWERS  

(FPV)  FOR  DRONE  CONTROL  AND  RACING.  WE  HAVE  OVER  300  ISSUED  AND 

PENDING PATENTS.

AREAS OF OPERATION

Kopin’s design centers, manufacturing operations and sales offices are located in the following markets:

Headquarters and Transmissive Display 
Manufacturing: Westborough, MA

Reflective Display Manufacturing: 
Dalgety Bay, Scotland

Sales Office: Seoul,  
South Korea

Sales Office: Tokyo Japan

Wearable Tech Center: San Jose, CA; 
Application Design Center: Scotts Valley, CA

Software Development: 
Nottingham, England

Design Center: Hong Kong

1

DEAR SHAREHOLDERS,

We are very pleased with our progress and accomplishments in 2016. Briefly, we continued our aggressive 
product  development  efforts  and  were  rewarded  with  a  tremendous  reception  at  the  last  Consumer 
Electronics Show (CES) in January 2017, winning four Innovation awards. We entered into strategic alliances 
with  partners  to  provide  us  with  the  bigger  and  broader  scale  necessary  to  meet  the  coming  demand 
from  the  augmented  reality  (AR)  and  virtual  reality  (VR)  markets.  Our  new  military  programs  continued 
ramping and we further strengthened our balance sheet by entering into an agreement to sell approximately 
7.6 million shares of our common stock to a key new global partner.

Let me provide some details on all of these achievements. 

First, at the CES in January we introduced Kopin’s new LightningTM 
OLED  microdisplay,  the  recipient  of  a  CES  Innovation  Award. 
Featuring  the  world’s  first  2048  by  2048  resolution  in  a  1-inch 
diagonal size, Lightning’s stunning image has dramatically raised 
the bar for VR displays. In addition, the superfast 120 HZ frame 
rate eliminates the latency that has often caused user discomfort, 
which  is  critical  to  expanding  VR  adoption.  We  believe  this 
Lightning architecture is capable of scaling to even higher resolu-
tions for future VR headset applications. After CES, we have had 
dozens  of  demonstrations  to  global  VR  companies  which  con-
firmed this new OLED display is indeed a giant leap forward for 
VR and we have protected our Lightning technology with 10 pat-
ent filings. We are now working with our partners to develop revo-
lutionary  headsets  incorporating  our  OLED  displays.  With  the 
addition of Lightning, Kopin has an unmatched component lineup. 
We  now  supply  LCDs,  LCOS  and  OLED  microdisplays,  along 
with unique optics, creating a full suite of display modules for mili-
tary,  industrial  and  consumer  electronics  applications.  With  the 
imminent  adoption  of  AR  and  VR,  Kopin  is  poised  to  supply 
industry leading optical solutions to this growing market. 

Now, let me discuss our SOLOS™ Wearable, another CES award 
winning product. Designed for cyclists SOLOS is an AR headset 
that  has  the  look  and  size  of  a  pair  of  athletic  sunglasses  but  it 
incorporates Kopin’s LCD display and Pupil® optics technology—
which  was  yet  another  CES  Innovation  Award  winner.  SOLOS 
wearables  can  access  the  internet  by  pairing  with  the  rider’s 
smartphone  via  WiFi  and  connect  to  sensors  on  the  bicycle 
through Bluetooth or ANT+. Our unique Pupil optical module pro-
vides a heads-up see-through digital image showing various met-
rics  such  as  speed,  distance,  cadence,  heart  rate,  elevation, 
calories,  and  maps.  The  rider  is  also  able  to  make  and  receive 
phone calls. SOLOS is targeted for serious cyclists and in 2016 
we  provided  SOLOS  to  USA  Olympian  cyclists  for  use  in  their 
training  for  the  Rio  Olympics.  The  Olympic  athletes’  feedback 
was  invaluable  for  our  further  product  refinements.  We  began 
marketing SOLOS through a Kickstarter campaign, which helped 
identify  early  adopters  and  gain  insight  into  desirable  features. 
We have begun shipping SOLOS to the Kickstarter customers. At 
the  same  time  we  are  actively  working  to  expand  the  SOLOS 

platform  to  offer  additional  features  specific  to  other  types  of 
health & fitness applications, such as running. We believe cycling 
is just the first of many new opportunities, as we strongly believe 
our  SOLOS  AR-wearable  can  be  broadened  to  many 
applications.

At CES we also demonstrated our proprietary Whisper™ technol-
ogy  and  our  Whisper  Voice  chip  for  enhancement  of  speech 
interface  and  control.  Whisper  received  our  fourth  Innovation 
award at CES. Our Whisper, protected by over 30 patents issued 
and pending, enables voice interface to be reliable and depend-
able.  There  are  many  examples  of  the  growing  use  of  voice  as 
the  primary  user  interface,  such  as  Apple’s  SIRI  or  the  strong 
sales  of  Amazon  Echo.  So  far,  however,  the  reliability  of  voice  
interface has been frustrating for many users. It is great when it 
works,  but  it  can  be  awful  in  various  types  of  noisier  environ-
ments.  Our  WhisperChip  effectively  handles  speech  recognition 
in  any  type  of  environment,  regardless  of  ambient  noise.  At  the 
heart  of  the  Whisper  technology  is  our  patented  Voice 
Extraction™  Filter  (VEF)  technology.  VEF  is  a  unique  approach 
to singulating the voice signal without distorting it, which enables 
speech engines to perform at a much more accurate and consis-
tent level—even in very noisy environments. With the increasing 
importance  of  voice  as  the  primary  interface  we  believe  our 
Whisper technology is well suited for a wide variety of consumer 
applications  and  products  in  the  emerging  wearables  and  IoT 
markets.

In  2016  Kopin  continued  working  with  Hitachi  Maxell  to  develop 
SiMax™, a revolutionary battery. You may recall that in 2015 we 
entered  into  an  agreement  with  Hitachi  Maxell  to  develop  a  new 
high-capacity lithium-ion (Li-ion) battery based on nano-particles 
of silicon oxide (SiO-C) in the anode for use in wearable products. 
A battery with these specifications has been one of the missing 
components  in  creating  wearables  devices.  The  SiMax  battery 
has  completed  certification  in  2016  and  we  are  now  reviewing 
various commercialization strategies. 

Our  progress  in  developing  our  technology  was  only  part  of  the 
story this year, as we also took steps to commercialize our lead-
ing  edge  products.  In  2016  we  entered  into  an  agreement  with 
Lenovo  to  form  a  joint  venture,  Lenovo  New  Vision  (LNV).  LNV 
was  formed  to  develop  AR  smart  headsets  for  the  enterprise 

2

KOPIN

market. Kopin committed a small amount of capital and some IP 
licensing  to  the  venture,  while  Lenovo  contributed  capital,  man-
agement  and  facilities.  Kopin  benefits  both  through  the  sale  of 
components in products along with the overall increase in value 
of  the  joint  venture.  LNV  has  an  aggressive  plan  to  introduce 
products in 2017. 

2016 was again an active development and investment year, with 
R&D expense of $16.0 million, down slightly from $17.6 million in 
2015. As a result of our development efforts in 2016, we filed for 30 
patents and had 37 patents granted to bring our total patent portfolio 
to over 300 patents and patents pending, by far one of the largest, 
earliest and strongest focused on the wearables industry.

Another strategic relationship was with China-based Goertek Inc. 
Goertek,  one  of  the  world’s  largest  audio  device  companies,  is 
also  the  largest  manufacturer  globally  of  wearables,  including 
AR/VR  headsets  and  smart  watches.  Under  the  arrangement 
Kopin  benefits  by  having  Goertek  provide,  among  other  things, 
ODM and OEM services for us. We also anticipate Goertek will 
include Kopin components in the reference designs they market 
to their global customers. Furthermore, we benefit by leveraging 
Goertek’s  purchasing  power  to  reduce  the  cost  to  manufacture 
our wearable systems. As we announced earlier, Goertek is not 
only our manufacturing partner, but they also made a significant 
investment in Kopin. Goertek has acquired approximately 7.6 mil-
lion shares of our common shares, or approximately 10% of our 
outstanding common shares, for approximately $25 million. We 
view  Goertek’s  partnership  and  investment  as  a  very  strong 
statement about the value of our technology. 

In summary, I’m pleased with the various steps we took this year 
to  commercialize  our  technology,  be  it,  licensing  our  system 
designs,  selling  our  proprietary  components,  or  in  some  cases, 
marketing complete systems. 

Turning to our military operations: in 2016 we received follow-on 
orders to supply displays for the AR helmets used by pilots of the 
F-35  Joint  Strike  fighter  jets—the  U.S.  military’s  premier  new 
fighter aircraft. This is one of the most sophisticated AR applica-
tions ever created, and Kopin is the sole provider of the displays. 
But the F-35 represents just one of the many military avionic pro-
grams in which Kopin has been the dominant player. In 2016 we 
were  awarded  a  contract  from  one  of  the  prime  contractors  for 
the Family of Weapon Sight (FWS) program to supply the weapon 
sight  eyepiece  assembly  for  the  FWS-I  portion  of  the  program. 
We  began  to  ship  products  under  the  LRIP  (low  rate  initial  pro-
duction) phase of the program and are moving towards full pro-
duction late in 2017. Once in full production we expect to receive 
contracts  for  many  assemblies  annually,  extending  over  many 
years. We were also selected to supply a second part of the FWS 
program, the FWS-Crew Served, where we have received a con-
tract for the Engineering and Manufacturing Develop ment (EMD) 
phase.  We  plan  on  delivering  initial  units  later  this  year  and  fol-
low-on units in 2018, with full production beginning in 2019, and 
ramping  to  several  thousand  units  per  year  by  2020.  The  FWS 
program is to replace the TWS program. As a reminder, over the 
years, Kopin has shipped over 200 million dollars of products to 
the previous TWS programs. 

In 2016 total revenues were $22.6 million versus $32.1 million in 
2015. The decline was due to a decrease in revenues from mili-
tary programs as we transitioned from volume production under 
the  TWS  program  to  the  development  phase  of  the  FWS  pro-
gram. In addition wearable revenue declined as a tier-one global 
customer decided to reposition their product from the consumer 
market to the enterprise market, which has lower volumes. 

3

Despite  our  significant  investment  in  product  development  and 
commercialization  of  our  technologies,  we  have  maintained  a 
very  solid  balance  sheet.  Kopin  finished  2016  almost  even  with 
the prior year, with $77.2 million in cash and marketable securi-
ties,  $70.0  million  in  working  capital  and  no  long  term  debt. 
Furthermore, we expect to receive approximately $25 million dol-
lars  from  the  sale  of  7.6  million  shares  of  our  common  stock  to 
Goertek.  As  such  we  believe  we  have  the  necessary  resources 
to grow our business as the wearable market develops.

A recent IDC study predicts that VR and AR represent an approxi-
mately $40 billion opportunity by 2020. Every day we see compa-
nies  making  significant  investments  and  announcing  product 
plans  targeted  to  VR  and  AR,  wearables  and  IoT  devices.  For 
example, we just recently entered into an agreement with Yunnan 
Olightek Opto-Electronic Technology Co. Ltd. to jointly acquire an 
OLED  production  deposition  machine  to  augment  their  capacity 
for  our  Lightning  OLED  microdisplays.  Also,  we  have  an  agree-
ment with BOE Technology Group Co. Ltd. and Olightek to con-
struct  the  world’s  largest  OLED  on  Si  microdisplay  facility  in 
China. These data points further our confidence in our strategy, 
as we see Kopin’s technologies playing a critical role in many of 
these  applications.  As  with  every  newly  developing  market  the 
upward trajectory is not linear, but the use cases we are seeing 
for  our  technologies  continue  to  grow.  We  strongly  believe  our 
strategy  is  correct,  and  our  progress  is  very  much  on  track. 
Whether it be a remote expert feature in an enterprise headset, 
voice command for wearable or IoT devices, or new gaming fea-
tures that leverage the integration of headtracking technology in 
a headset, these use cases reinforce our belief that our targeted 
markets  and  applications  will  grow  dramatically  in  the  coming 
years.  While  some  of  the  early  hype  excitement  around  VR/AR 
may  have  slowed,  our  partners  see  the  opportunities.  Kopin  is 
well positioned for coming AR/VR emergence, as a leading pro-
vider of technology, products and solutions for this new world and 
we look forward to sharing this journey with our loyal shareholders 
and employees.

Sincerely,

JOHN C.C. FAN, PH.D.
JOHN C C FAN PH D

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

April 7, 2017

SOLOS
BIO-INSPIRED PERFORMANCE AUGMENTED REALITY 
WEARABLES

We are approaching a time when the human body will be   
augmented with wearable technology from head-to-toe.

What You See

How It Connects

Vista Pupil Scale Display
o  World’s smallest optical module for 

high-resolution near-eye applications 

o  Pupil scale optics match biometrics of 
the eye for heightened visual clarity

o  Visual screen is 4X larger than fixed 
displays and sharp even in bright 
sunlight

Adjustable Display Arm
o  Repositionable display arm for per-
sonal adjustment of viewing angles

o  Glance-up, glance-down or see-past 

views complement your  
riding position

o  Engineered from thermoplastic nylon 

for extreme durability

Sleek Aerodynamic Frames
o  Low profile silhouette for minimal 
wind resistance and ergonomic 
comfort

o  Integrates with helmet designs  
for efficient airflow and optimal 
peripheral vision

o  Robust, low-density military  

grade thermoplastic-polyamide  
nylon blend

High Quality Lenses
o  Premium quality optical lenses for the 
ultimate in clarity, detail and protection

o  Made from high-impact, safety rated 

Trivex Polymer

o  Perfect for riding on sunny or  

cloudy days

Fully Immersive Audio
o  Dual microphones and dual micro-

speakers are integrated into the Solos 
frame

o  Uses vocal separation for voice clarity 

amid background noise.

o  Off-ear design for ambient awareness; 
dynamic volume control for consistent 
levels

Long Life Power Cell
o  High density lithium ion cell embed-

ded into the frame

o Designed for 6 hours of run time

o  Exclusively developed by a leading 

Japanese battery partner

4

FINANCIAL INFORMATION 
AND FORM 10-K

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

(in thousands, except per share data)

Revenues

Gross profit

Net (loss) income

Continuing operations
Discontinued operations
 Net loss attributable to controlling interest

Net (loss) income per share
Continuing operations
Discontinued operations

Net loss per share

2016

$ 22,643

$ 3,301

$(23,031)
—
$(23,434)

$

$

(.37)
—

(.37)

2015

2014

2013

2012

$ 32,054

$ 31,808

$ 22,898

$ 34,642

$ 6,638

$ 7,365

$

(80)

$ 9,257

$(14,843)
—
$(14,693)

$(28,671)
—
$(28,212)

$(25,753)
$ 20,147
$ (4,710)

$(21,783)
$ 2,789
$(18,362)

$

$

(.23)
—

(.23)

$

$

(.45)
—

(.45)

$
$

$

(.40)
.32

(.08)

$
$

$

(.33)
.04

(.29)

 
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

È ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016

OR
‘ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from

to

Commission file number 0-19882

KOPIN CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)

125 North Drive, Westborough, MA
(Address of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

04-2833935
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

01581-3335
(Zip Code)

(508) 870-5959
Common Stock, par value $.01 per share
(Title of Class)

Name of each exchange on which registered
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

NASDAQ Global Market
None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes ‘ No È

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes ‘ No È

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes È No ‘

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). È Yes ‘ No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and

will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference
in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ‘

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a
smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer ‘
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Non-Accelerated Filer ‘ Smaller Reporting Company ‘

Accelerated Filer È

Yes ‘ No È

As of June 24, 2016 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recent second fiscal quarter) the aggregate market value of

outstanding shares of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $156,249,466

As of March 17, 2017, 67,546,360 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, were issued and

outstanding.

Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement relating to its 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated

by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K where indicated.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Part I

Forward Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including, without limitation, statements made relating to our
belief that Kopin’s Wearable technology will enable easier and more convenient access to the content individuals
carry in their smartphones or “in the cloud”, and will be embraced by both consumers and commercial users;
our belief that our understanding of the needs associated with wearable headset systems and our customers’
products has been an important reason we have previously been successful in developing customer relationships;
our belief that our system know-how is a compelling reason customers choose us as their supplier; our belief that
small form factor displays will be a critical component in the development of military, consumer electronic and
augmented and virtual reality markets must provide high resolution images without compromising the portability
of the product; our expectation that we will have negative cash flow from operating activities in 2017; our
intention to continue to pursue other U.S. government development contracts for applications that relate to our
commercial product applications; our intention to prosecute and defend our proprietary technology
aggressively; our belief that it is important to retain personnel with experience and expertise relevant to our
business; our belief that our products are targeted towards markets that are still developing and our competitive
strength is creating new technologies; our belief that it is important to invest in research and development to
achieve profitability even during periods when we are not profitable; our belief that the technical nature of our
products and markets demands a commitment to close relationships with our customers; our belief that continued
introduction of new products in our target markets is essential to our growth; our belief that our wearable
technology will be embraced by consumers and commercial users; our belief that our ability to develop and
expand our wearable technologies and to market and license our concept systems and components will be
critical for our revenue growth, positive cash flow, and profitability; our statement that we may make equity
investments in companies; our belief that a strengthening of the U.S. dollar could increase the price of our
products in foreign markets; the impact of new regulations relating to conflict minerals on customer demands
and increased costs related to compliance with such regulations; our belief that our future success will depend
primarily upon the technical expertise, creative skills and management abilities of our officers and key
employees rather than on patent ownership; our belief that our extensive portfolio of patents, trade secrets and
non-patented know-how provides us with a competitive advantage in the wearable technologies market; our
belief that our ability to develop components, software and noise canceling technology and innovative headset
system designs enhances our opportunity to grow within our targeted markets; our belief that our manufacturing
process offers greater miniaturization, higher pixel density, full color capability, lower power consumption, and
higher brightness compared to conventional active matrix LCD manufacturing approaches; our expectation not
to pay cash dividends for the foreseeable future and to retain earnings for the development of our businesses; our
expectation that we will expend between $2.0 million and $3.0 million on capital expenditures over the next
twelve months; our belief that small form factor displays will be a critical component in the development of
advanced wireless communications systems; our belief that wireless smartphone makers are looking to create
products that work as a complement to the smartphone or to eventually replace the smartphone with more
convenient configurations; our belief that we will regain compliance with Nasdaq; our belief that our available
cash resources will support our operations and capital needs for at least the next twelve months; our expectation
that we will have taxes based on federal alternative minimum tax rules and on our foreign operations in 2017;
our expectation that we will have a state tax provision in 2017; our expectation that the adoption of certain
accounting standards will not have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations; our
belief that our business is not disproportionately affected by climate change regulations; our belief that our
operations have not been materially affected by inflation; and our belief that the effect, if any, of reasonably
possible near-term changes in interest rates on our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows
should not be material. These forward-looking statements are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts
and projections about the industries in which we operate, management’s beliefs, and assumptions made by
management. In addition, other written or oral statements, which constitute forward-looking statements, may be
made by or on behalf of us. Words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “plans”, “believes”, “could”,
“seeks”, “estimates”, and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such

2

forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks,
uncertainties and assumptions, which are difficult to predict. Therefore, actual outcomes and results may differ
materially from what is expressed or forecasted in such forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences in outcomes
and results include, but are not limited to, those discussed below in Item 1A and those set forth in our other
periodic filings filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Except as required by law, we do not intend
to update any forward-looking statements even if new information becomes available or other events occur in the
future.

Item 1.

Business

Introduction

We were incorporated in Delaware in 1984 and are a leading inventor, developer, manufacturer and seller of

Wearable technologies which include components and systems.

On January 16, 2013, we completed the sale of our III-V product line, including all of the outstanding equity

interest in KTC Wireless, LLC (KTC), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, to IQE KC, LLC (IQE) and
IQE plc (Parent, and collectively with IQE, the Buyer). Upon agreement of the final working capital and other
adjustments the net purchase price was $70.2 million, and the gain on the sale, net of tax, was $20.1 million.
Under the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the final $15 million of the purchase price was received on
January 15, 2016.

The components that we offered for sale in 2016 consisted of our proprietary miniature active-matrix liquid

crystal displays (AMLCD), liquid crystal on silicon (LCOS) displays, application specific integrated circuits
(ASICs), backlights, optical lenses and audio integrated circuits (IC). We refer to our AMLCD as
“CyberDisplays” and our audio IC as “Whisper™ Chip”. Our transmissive AMLCDs and reflective LCOS
micro-displays are manufactured by us in our facilities in Westborough, Massachusetts, USA and Dalgety Bay,
Scotland, U.K., respectively, and provide either color or monochrome images and are offered in a variety of sizes
and resolutions. The ASICs we offer are designed by us and are the electronic interfaces between our displays
and the product into which the displays are incorporated. The optical lenses and backlights we offer are based on
either our proprietary designs or designs we license from third parties. Our licensed optical lenses are subject to
agreements that have termination dates and are therefore subject to renewals. Our audio technologies are
developed internally at our San Jose, California audio lab. The ASICs, optical lenses, and backlights are
manufactured by third parties based on our purchase orders. The Whisper Chip is manufactured by third parties
based on our purchase orders.

Our components are sold separately or in various levels of integration. For example, we offer a display

module which includes an optical lens and backlight contained in either plastic or metal housings, a binocular
display module which has two displays, lenses and backlight or a higher-level assembly which has additional
components for military applications. Current products which include our components are augmented reality
consumer wearable devices for sports and fitness and virtual reality consumer products for recreational and sport
drones; military devices such as thermal weapon sights and fighter pilot helmets; and industrial and public safety
devices such as fire fighter thermal camera enabled masks. Our reflective display products are also configured as
spatial light modulators and are used in industrial equipment for 3D Automated Optical Inspection. We have sold
our AMLCD products to Rockwell Collins, Elbit, Raytheon Company, DRS RSTA Inc., BAE Systems (directly
and through a third party QiOptiq), and ITT for use in military applications, to Google for consumer wearable
products, and to Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Samsung), and Olympus Corporation (Olympus) for digital still
cameras.

We have designed and offer systems that are focused on the emerging enterprise and consumer markets for

head-worn, hands-free voice and gesture controlled wireless computing and communication devices. Our systems
connect via Bluetooth or WiFi to a smartphone or similar device in order to access or transmit information from

3

or to the Internet or devices that are in close proximity. A unique feature of our enterprise systems is the ability to
contact a resource, referred to as the “Remote Expert”, who can help in solving problems. The system user and
the Remote Expert can be in different locations so while the system user may be in a hazardous outside location
the Remote Expert may be in an in-house location. This allows companies that purchase enterprise systems the
ability to leverage their in-house experts to the technicians in the field. We currently license our systems under
agreements which include a royalty payable to us and a purchase and supply agreement which requires our
customer to buy our components for the system. These systems include our components and a variety of
commercially available software packages and our proprietary software. Our business model is to license our
concept systems or technologies to branded OEM customers who wish to develop and market head-worn
products for both mobile enterprise and consumer applications.

In 2016, we began offering Solos™ wearables, an augmented reality wearable headset designed for the
consumer fitness market. Solos is our proprietary design and contains our display, optic, and ASIC technologies
and internally developed software. Solos is a hands-free head-worn device that allows the user to access
information either from the Internet through a smartphone or from the various Bluetooth, WiFi or ANT+ enabled
devices. For example, a cyclist user can see the information being provided by the bike sensors such as speed,
cadence or watts produced, can access the Internet for GPS location or can access an Internet training application.

For fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014, significant display customers are shown below. The caption “Military

Customers in Total” in the table below excludes research and development contracts.

Customer

Military Customers in Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Raytheon Company . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Google Inc. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Rockwell Collins . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Shenzhen Oriscape . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
U.S. Government funded research and development contracts . . . . . . .

Percent of Total
Revenues

2016

2015

2014

24% 32% 45%
18% 26%
*
22% 11%
*
*
12%
*
20%
3%
3%

*
*
4%

(“*” denotes that the customer’s revenues were less than 10% of our total company revenues)

Our fiscal year ends on the last Saturday in December. The fiscal years ended December 31, 2016,
December 26, 2015, and December 27, 2014 are referred to herein as fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014,
respectively. Our principal executive offices are located at 125 North Drive, Westborough, Massachusetts. Our
telephone number is (508) 870-5959.

Industry Overview

Wearable Computing/Communicating

The introduction and wide acceptance of the smart-phone has generated advances in many technologies
including smaller and cheaper electronic components, voice search engines and wireless 4G networks. Smart
phone adoption has also been the catalyst for the development of software for a wide-range of applications.
Leveraging off of these advances and the growth of cloud computing a new category of “wearable” products,
Smart Headsets, is emerging that provides access to data and these Apps, with some Smart Headsets including
the use of voice activated hands-free technology. This emerging category of Wearable Systems can be used for
hundreds of different applications by enterprise workers, public safety officials and consumers, bringing ever-
increasing productivity, fun and convenience. Through the use of Smart Headsets both workers and consumers
can have access to their digital files, the Internet, phone, e-mail etc., enabling an “always connected” work-style
and lifestyle. We believe that advances in wearables will continue to make the “always connected” life
increasingly convenient and more productive by providing easier access to and control of the information
accessible through our electronic devices.

4

Wearable products also include body-worn devices such as sensors, scanners and terminals which are sold

to enterprise markets to improve worker productivity and the consumer market to monitor health and fitness
metrics such as heart rate, speed and temperature. The user interface for these devices is typically either a key
pad or a touch-screen. Some Wearable products include voice recognition software as an additional feature to
allow the user to navigate the device’s interface “hands-free” instead of using a traditional mouse, touch-screen
or keypad. We believe wireless smartphone makers are looking to create products that work as a complement to
the smartphone or to eventually replace the smartphone with more convenient configurations. Wireless network
companies are encouraging the development of more products that utilize their network capacity and other
companies are developing products which provide continuous access to social media outlets. In order for the
markets for these new products to develop and grow, devices must further advance and application software that
exploits the devices new features and functions must be developed. Device improvements include smaller, higher
resolution displays, lower power processors, longer-life batteries, compact optics and software including voice
recognition and noise cancellation.

Our Solution

Kopin Wearable Technology

Kopin Wearable technology includes component technologies which can be integrated to create products
and proprietary headset systems which use voice as the primary user interface and through the use of wireless
technologies can contact other users, devices in close proximity or information from the cloud.

Components

The components we offer for sale primarily consist of our displays, backlights, ASICs, optical lenses and

our audio IC, Whisper Chip.

Display Products

Small form factor displays are used in military, consumer, and industrial products such as thermal weapon

sights, digital cameras, virtual and augmented reality gaming, training and simulation products and metrology
tools. In order for these markets to develop and grow, advances and investment in application software, optics
and wireless communications systems with greater bandwidth and increased functionality will be necessary. We
believe small form factor displays will be a critical component in the development of these markets as these
systems must provide high resolution images without compromising the portability of the product.

There are several display technologies commercially available including transmissive, reflective and
emissive. Our principal display products are miniature high density color or monochrome Active Matrix Liquid
Crystal Displays (AMLCDs) with resolutions that range from approximately 320 x 240 resolution to 2048 x 2048
resolution and are sold in either a transmissive or reflective format. We sell our displays individually or in
combination with our other components assembled in a unit. For example we sell a module unit that includes a
single display, backlight and optics in a plastic housing, a binocular display module unit that includes two
displays, backlights and optics in a plastic housing or in a Higher-Level Assembly (HLA) that contains a display,
light emitting diode based illumination, optics, and electronics in a sealed housing, primarily for military
applications.

Our transmissive display products, which we refer to as CyberDisplay™ products, utilize high quality,
single crystal on silicon, which is the same high quality silicon used in conventional integrated circuits. This
single crystal silicon is not grown on glass; rather, it is first formed on a silicon wafer and patterned into an
integrated circuit (including the active matrix, driver circuitry and other logic circuits) in an integrated circuit
foundry. These processes enable the manufacture of miniature active matrix circuits, that are comparable or
higher resolution displays relative to passive and other active matrix displays that are fabricated on glass. Our
foundry partners fabricate integrated circuits for our CyberDisplay displays in their foundries in Taiwan. The

5

fabricated wafers are then returned to our facilities, where we lift the integrated circuits off the silicon wafers and
transfer them to glass using our proprietary Wafer Engineering technology. The transferred integrated circuits are
then processed, packaged with liquid crystal and assembled into display panels at our Display Manufacturing
Center in Westborough, Massachusetts.

Our proprietary technology enables the production of transparent circuits on a transparent substrate, in
contrast to conventional silicon circuits, which are on an opaque substrate. Our CyberDisplay products’ imaging
properties are a result of the inclusion of a liquid crystal layer between the active matrix integrated circuit glass
and the transparent cover glass. We believe our manufacturing process offers several advantages over
conventional active matrix LCD manufacturing approaches with regard to small form factor displays, including:

•

•

•

•

•

Greater miniaturization;

Higher pixel density;

Full color capability;

Lower power consumption; and

Higher brightness

The color CyberDisplay products we sell generate colors by using color filters with a white backlight. Color

filter technology is a process in which display pixels are patterned with materials, which selectively absorb or
transmit the red, green or blue colors of light.

For military applications which use our CyberDisplay, the display is fabricated, tested and incorporated into
a Higher Level Assembly (HLA). We offer a variety of models with varying levels of complexity but common to
all models is our display, illuminations source, optics and electronics in a sealed unit.

Our reflective LCOS displays products are miniature high density, dual mode color sequential/monochrome

reflective micro displays with resolutions which range from approximately 1280 x 720 pixels (720P) resolution
to 2048 x 1536 pixels (QXGA) resolution. These displays are manufactured at our facility in Scotland, U.K. Our
reflective displays are based on a proprietary, very high-speed, ferroelectric liquid crystal on silicon (FLCOS)
platform. Our digital software and logic based drive electronics combined with the very fast switching binary
liquid crystal enables our micro display to process images purely digitally and create red, green and blue gray
scale in the time domain. This architecture has major advantages in visual performance over other liquid crystal,
organic light-emitting diode and MEMS based technologies: precisely controlled full color or monochrome gray
scale is achieved on a matrix of undivided high fill factor pixels, motion artifacts are reduced to an insignificant
level and there are no sub-pixels, no moving mirrors and no analog conversions to detract from the quality of the
image.

The FLCOS device is comprised of two substrates. The first is a pixelated silicon-based CMOS substrate
which is manufactured by our foundry partner using conventional silicon integrated circuit lithography processes.
The silicon substrate forms the display’s backplane, serving as both the active matrix to drive individual pixels
and as a reflective mirror. The second substrate is a front glass plate. Between the backplane and the front glass
substrate is a ferroelectric liquid crystal material which, when switched, enables the incoming illumination to be
modulated.

In 2017 we demonstrated our first emissive display organic light emitting diode (OLED) microdisplay,
which we refer to as Lightning™. Lightning is designed to addresses the most challenging technical hurdles with
virtual reality systems, including the visible “screen door” effect, which is due to insufficient display resolution,
bulky size, and nausea or dizziness from motion-to-photon latency, as well as heat-build-up caused by high
power consumption. We combine the one-inch diagonal Lightning OLED microdisplay (which is less than 1/10
the size of direct view displays) with our patented Pantile™ optics (< 30 mm thick) to enable system

6

manufacturers to create much smaller and thinner mobile VR systems. The Lightning OLED microdisplay has
almost zero latency (about 10 microseconds) and an industry leading 120-Hz frame rate. At the same time,
Lightning’s distinctive design enables low power consumption, even at 120 Hz.

In deciding on the appropriate display for a given application, the AMLCD is typically used in bright light

conditions as its brightness can be modulated by increasing the brightness of the backlight. Current OLED
technology is not sufficiently bright to compete with a bright ambient environment but the OLED typically has a
wider field of view and it is therefore better used in an immersive products environment that blocks out the
ambient light.

Optical Lenses and Backlights

We offer a variety of optical lenses some of which we have developed internally and others we license the
rights to sell the lenses. We also offer a variety of backlights, some of which we have developed internally and
are “off-the-shelf” components. The lenses come in a variety of sizes starting with the smallest being our Pupil,
followed by our Pearl, Prism, Pantile, and Pancake lenses. The different sizes of lenses give us and our customers
design flexibility when creating headset systems. There is a trade-off between the lens size and the size of the
perceived image to the viewer. For example, a Pearl lens will provide the viewer with an image approximately
equivalent to what the viewer would see looking at a smartphone, whereas a Prism lens will provide the viewer
with an image approximately equivalent to what the viewer would see looking at a tablet. A Pearl lens, however,
is smaller than a Prism and would enable a more fashionable design. Therefore, a customer designing a
consumer-oriented product may choose a Pearl lens but a customer designing an enterprise-oriented product
might choose a Prism Lens. We use third parties to manufacture these lenses.

Whisper Chip

Today, many devices are equipped to use voice as an input or control method for the device. Most users

find, however, that today’s speech recognition on their devices is not satisfactory because it does not work
reliably in the variety of noise environments we find ourselves in during the course of our days. The root cause of
the low reliability is that the noise canceling software used in today’s devices is not always effective. The
Whisper Chip addresses this problem. It is designed to enhance the performance of existing audio systems and
speech recognition engines by allowing the speaker’s voice to be clearly “heard” by the listener, whether the
“listener” is a person or a machine. The Whisper Chip incorporates our Voice Extraction™ Filter (VEF). VEF is
a patented approach to singulating the voice signal without distorting it. The Whisper Chip is an all-digital
solution that runs at 16MHz, consumes less than 12mW of power and replaces the CODEC so no ADC or DAC
is needed. The Whisper Chip is 4 x 4 mm in size and accepts up to four (4) digital microphone inputs. We use
third parties to manufacture the Whisper Chip.

Headset Systems

Our headset systems include:

•

•

•

Consumer-oriented headsets that resemble typical eyeglasses but include voice and audio capabilities
allowing the user to communicate with other users;

Augmented reality health and fitness sunglasses, called Solos Smart glasses, that have voice and audio
capabilities, a Pupil display module which overlays situational information on the glasses, and

Industrial headset reference design, called Golden-i, which is essentially a complete head-worn
computer that includes an optical pod with one of our display products, a microprocessor, battery,
camera, memory and various commercially available software packages that we license.

Our headsets receive or transmit data from or to the Internet by interfacing with a smartphone or similar

device via WiFi or Bluetooth. They can also receive information from devices in close proximity using ANT+.

7

The display module or optical pod allows users to view the information such as Internet data, emails, text
messages, maps or biometric data (heart rate), and situational data (speed, distance traveled, watts produced) at a
“normal” size because of our specialized optics. Our industrial headset Golden-i provides the capability of
viewing technical diagrams, by enabling the user to zoom in to see finer details or zoom out to see a larger
perspective. The Golden-i is equipped with a camera to enable a picture to be taken, video to be streamed or face-
to-face communication to occur. The camera enables users to send pictures or stream live video to a remote
subject matter expert so that both the user and expert can analyze an issue at the same time and collaboratively
identify and implement a solution. Our headsets utilize operating system software we developed.

We believe Kopin’s wearable technology will enable easier and more convenient access to the content
individuals carry in their smartphones or “in the cloud” and will be embraced by both consumers and commercial
users. For commercial users, we believe increased productivity, safety and improved manufacturing quality
through more efficient issue resolution and improved communication will drive adoption. Kopin Wearable
reference designs are targeted for markets where the user needs a much greater range of functionality than is
typically provided by wireless devices such as handsets, smartphones, tablets or Bluetooth headsets and either
due to the requirements of their usage patterns, occupation, or for improved productivity the user is better served
with a hands-free display system with voice recognition as the primary interface as opposed to a touchscreen or
keyboard.

Strategy

Our commercial product strategy is to invent, develop, manufacture and sell the leading-edge critical
components that enable our customers to create differentiated wearable products in their respective markets, to
license wearable headset computing system designs to customers who wish to offer products that enable a better
“always connected” experience and to offer our Solos Wearables glasses to the health and fitness market. The
core products we offer for sale are: displays, optics, and audio chip along with headset system software and
compact system designs. Our military strategy is to work primarily with the U.S. military to determine its
program needs several years in the future and develop products which meet those needs. Our commercial
business model is to enable our customers to move into the market quickly by either licensing our system designs
and entering into agreements for the purchase and sale of our components or just selling our components
separately. The critical elements of our strategy include:

•

Broad Portfolio of Intellectual Property. We believe that our extensive portfolio of patents, trade
secrets and non-patented know-how provides us with a competitive advantage in the wearable
computing industry and we have been accumulating, either by internal efforts or through acquisition, a
significant patent and know-how portfolio. We own, exclusively license or have the exclusive right to
sublicense approximately 300 patents and patent applications issued and pending worldwide. An
important piece of our strategy is to continue to accumulate valuable patented and non-patented
technical know-how relating to our micro displays as well as other critical technologies for advanced
wearable services.

• Maintain Our Technological Leadership. We are a recognized leader in the design, development and
manufacture of high resolution micro displays and modules which incorporate our micro displays with
optics and ASICs and, in 2016 we introduced our audio IC, Whisper Chip. In 2017 we introduced our
Lightning OLED microdisplay. We believe our ability to develop components, software and noise
canceling technology and innovative headset system designs enhances our opportunity to grow within
our targeted markets. By continuing to invest in research and development, we are able to add to our
expertise as a system and components supplier for our original equipment manufacturer (our “OEM”)
customers, and we intend to continue to focus our development efforts on proprietary wearable
computing systems.

•

Develop Headset Systems. The Wearable device market is just beginning and part of our strategy is to
develop headset systems which we will either sell directly or license to our customers in order to
facilitate our customers’ design-in process of our components into their finished products. We believe

8

our understanding of the needs associated with wearable headset systems and our customers’ products
has been an important reason we have previously been successful in developing customer relationships.
We believe our system know-how is a compelling reason customers choose us as their supplier.

•

•

Internally Manufactured Products and Use of Third Party Manufacturing. We manufacture our
display products in facilities that we lease and manage. Our optical lenses, backlights and ASICs are
manufactured by third parties who are only authorized to manufacture and supply to us. We plan on
using third parties to manufacture and supply Whisper Chips to us. The use of these third party
manufacturers reduces our investments in plant and equipment and working capital for new products
and enables us to update designs as trends change.

Strong U.S. Government Program Support. We perform under research and development contracts
with U.S. government agencies, such as the U.S. Night Vision Laboratory and the U.S. Department of
Defense. Under these contracts, the U.S. Government funds a portion of our efforts to develop next-
generation micro-display related technologies. This enables us to supplement our internal research and
development budget with additional funding.

Markets and Customers

Wearable products

Our business model is to generate revenues by selling components to customers who develop and

manufacture, or distribute, products based on our technology and licensing, for a royalty fee, our system designs
and know-how, which includes the operating software and patented product designs, and to sell Solos Wearables
directly. We may also receive development fees from customers to help them integrate our technology into their
products. The licensing aspect of our business model and sales of Solos Wearables is relatively new and to date
the revenues have been de minimis.

Display Products

We currently sell our display products to our customers in various configurations including but not limited

to a single display component, a module that includes a display, lens, backlight and focus mechanism and
electronics, a binocular display module that includes two displays, lenses, and backlights, and as higher level
assemblies or HLA for military customers. An HLA is similar to a module but includes additional components
such as an eye cup specific to a military application.

We have sold our AMLCD products to Rockwell Collins, Elbit, Raytheon Company, DRS RSTA Inc., BAE

Systems (directly and through a third party QiOptiq), and ITT for use in military applications, to Google for
consumer wearable products, and to Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Samsung), and Olympus Corporation
(Olympus) for digital still cameras. We have licensed our wearable systems to Motorola Inc. and Fujitsu Limited
for enterprise wearable systems.

In order for our display products to function properly in their intended applications, ASICs generally are

required. Several companies have designed ASICs to work with our display products and our customers can
procure these chip sets directly from the manufacturer or through us.

For fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014, sales to military customers, excluding research and development

contracts, as a percentage of total revenue were 24%, 32% and 45%, respectively.

For fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014, research and development revenues, primarily from multiple contracts

with various U.S. governmental agencies, accounted for approximately 7%, 12% and 15%, respectively, of our
total revenues.

For additional information with respect to our operating segments including sales and geographical
information, see Note 15 to our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016, included with this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.

9

Sales and Marketing

Our strategy is to sell our components both directly and through distributors to original equipment

manufacturers. We sell our military display products directly to prime contractors of the U.S. government or to
foreign companies. For our component products we historically have had a few customers who purchase in large
volumes and many customers who buy in small volumes as part of their product development efforts. “Large
volume” is a relative term. For consumer display customers, purchases may be in the tens of thousands per week,
whereas industrial and military customers may purchase less than a hundred per month. We offer our Solos smart
headset directly via the Internet and license our other headset system designs to customers who will develop end
user products that include our components and software. Other than Solos, our system designs are not finished
products because the specific end user case that our customers are targeting are specialized and require deep
customer knowledge and customized application software. As a result there are typically additional development
efforts which we work with our customers on and we may be reimbursed for these efforts.

We believe that the technical nature of our products and markets demands a commitment to close
relationships with our customers. Our sales and marketing staff, assisted by our technical staff and senior
management, visit prospective and existing customers worldwide on a regular basis. We believe these contacts
are vital to the development of a close, long-term working relationship with our customers, and in obtaining
regular forecasts, market updates and information regarding technical and market trends. We also participate in
industry specific trade shows and conferences.

Our design and engineering staff are actively involved with customers during all phases of prototype design

through production by providing engineering data, up-to-date product application notes, regular follow-up and
technical assistance. In most cases, our technical staff work with each customer in the development stage to
identify potential improvements to the design of the customer’s product in parallel with the customer’s effort. We
have established a prototype product design group in Scotts Valley, California to assist our military product
customers and in San Jose, California to assist our Whisper Chip IC product customers. These groups assist
customers with incorporating our technologies and products into our customer’s products and to accelerate the
design process, achieving cost-effective and manufacturable products, and ensuring a smooth transition into high
volume production. Our group in Scotts Valley is also actively involved with research and development contracts
for military applications.

Product Development

We believe that continued introduction of new products in our target markets is essential to our growth. Our

commercial products tend to have one to three year life cycles. We have assembled a group of highly skilled
engineers who work internally as well as with our customers to continue our product development efforts. Our
primary development efforts are focused on displays, noise cancellation, optics and headset system designs. For
fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014 we incurred total research and development expenses of $16.0 million, $17.6
million and $20.7 million, respectively.

Component Products

Our display product development efforts are focused towards continually enhancing the resolution,

performance and manufacturability of our display products. A principal focus of this effort is the improvement of
manufacturing processes for very small active matrix pixels with our eight-inch manufacturing line. The pixel
size of our current transmissive display products ranges from 6.8 to 15 microns. These pixel sizes are much
smaller than a pixel size of approximately 100 microns in a typical laptop computer display. The resolutions of
our current commercially available display products are 320 x 240, 432 x 240, 640 x 360, 640 x 480, 854 x 480,
800 x 600, 1,280 x 720 and 1,280 x 1,024. In addition, we have demonstrated 2,048 x 2,048 resolution displays in
a 0.99-inch diagonal size. We are also working on further decreasing the power consumption of our display
products. The pixel size of our current reflective display products ranges from 8.2 to 13.6 microns. The
resolutions of our current commercially available reflective display products are 1,280 x 768, 1,280 x 1,024 and

10

2,048 x 1,536 pixels. Additional display development efforts include expanding the resolutions offered,
increasing the quantity of display active matrix pixel arrays processed on each wafer by further reducing the
display size, increasing the light throughput of our pixels, increasing manufacturing yields, and increasing the
functionality of our HLA products.

We offer components such as our optical lenses, backlights and ASICs, which we have manufactured to our

specifications, which we buy and resell. The components which are made to order include either intellectual
property we developed or that we license from third parties.

Headset System Design Products

Our headset system efforts are primarily focused on operating and application software development,
improving the optics in the display pod and reducing the size and power consumption of the unit and improving
the overall fit and style of the system.

Funded Research and Development

We have entered into various development contracts with agencies and prime contractors of the U.S.
government and commercial customers. These contracts help support the continued development of our core
technologies. We intend to continue to pursue development contracts for applications that relate to our
commercial and military product applications. Our contracts contain certain milestones relating to technology
development and may be terminated prior to completion of funding. Our policy is to retain our proprietary rights
with respect to the principal commercial applications of our technology however we are not always able to retain
our proprietary rights. To the extent technology development has been funded by a U.S. federal agency, under
applicable U.S. federal laws the federal agency that provided the funding has the right to obtain a non-exclusive,
non-transferable, irrevocable, fully paid license to practice or have practiced this technology for governmental
use. For our commercial development agreements customers often obtain exclusive rights to a particular display
or technology that is developed either permanently or for some period of time. Revenues attributable to research
and development contracts for fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014 totaled $1.5 million, $3.9 million and $4.9
million, respectively.

Competition

Component Products

The commercial display market is highly competitive and is currently dominated by large Asian-based
electronics companies including AUO, Himax, LG Display, Samsung, Sharp, Seiko and Sony. The display
market consists of multiple segments, each focusing on different end-user applications applying different
technologies. Competition in the display field is based on price and performance characteristics, product quality,
size and the ability to deliver products in a timely fashion. The success of our display product offerings will also
depend upon the adoption of our display products by consumers as an alternative to traditional active matrix
LCDs or OLEDs and upon our ability to compete against other types of well-established display products and
new emerging display products. Particularly significant is a consumer’s willingness to use a near eye display
device, as opposed to a direct view display which may be viewed from a distance of several inches to several
feet. In addition companies such as Samsung and Oculus are offering products which use a cell phone or a cell
phone display to provide the image. Cell phone displays typically have lower resolution and greater image
latency than our products but are lower in cost. We cannot be certain that we will be able to compete against
these companies and technologies, or that the consumer will accept the use of such eyewear in general or our
partners’ form factor specifically.

There are also a number of active matrix LCD and alternative display technologies in development and
production. These technologies include plasma, organic light emitting diode and virtual retinal displays, some of
which target the high performance small form factor display markets in which our military display products are

11

sold. There are many large and small companies that manufacture or have in development products based on
these technologies. Our display products will compete with other displays utilizing these and other competing
display technologies.

There are many companies whose sole business is the development and manufacture of optical lenses,
backlights, ASICs, software and noise cancellation products. These companies may have significantly more
intellectual property and experience than we do in the design and development of these components. We do not
manufacture optical lenses, backlights, or ASICs but we either have them made to our specifications or buy
standard off-the-shelf products.

Headset Concept Design Products

The markets for our headset systems are targeted at currently used smartphones, laptop computers, personal

computers, tablets, ruggedized portable computers referred to as “tough books” and a variety of hand-held
devices. This market is extremely competitive and is served by companies such as Panasonic, Toshiba, Dell,
HTC, Hewlett Packard, Apple, Sony and Samsung. These companies are substantially larger than Kopin from
revenue, cash flow and asset perspectives.

Patents, Proprietary Rights and Licenses

An important part of our product development strategy is to seek, when appropriate, protection for our
products and proprietary technology through the use of various United States and foreign patents and contractual
arrangements. We intend to prosecute and defend our proprietary technology aggressively. Many of our United
States patents and applications have counterpart foreign patents, foreign applications or international applications
through the Patent Cooperation Treaty. In addition, we have licensed United States patents and some foreign
counterparts to these United States patents from MIT.

The process of seeking patent protection can be time consuming and expensive and we cannot be certain
that patents will be issued from currently pending or future applications or that our existing patents or any new
patents that may be issued will be sufficient in scope or strength to provide meaningful protection or any
commercial advantage to us. We may be subject to or may initiate contested patent proceedings in the United
States Patent and Trademark Office, foreign patent offices or the courts, which can demand significant financial
and management resources. Patent applications in the United States typically are maintained in secrecy until they
are published about eighteen months after their earliest claim to priority; since publication of discoveries in the
scientific and patent literature lags behind actual discoveries, we cannot be certain that we were the first to
conceive of inventions covered by pending patent applications or the first to file patent applications on such
inventions. We cannot be certain that our pending patent applications or those of our licensors will result in
issued patents or that any issued patents will afford protection against a competitor. In addition, we cannot be
certain that others will not obtain patents that we would need to license, circumvent or cease manufacturing and
sales of products covered by these patents, nor can we be sure that licenses, if needed, would be available to us
on favorable terms, if at all.

We cannot be certain that foreign intellectual property laws will protect our intellectual property rights or

that others will not independently develop similar products, duplicate our products or design around any patents
issued or licensed to us. Our products might infringe upon the patent rights of others, whether existing now or in
the future. For the same reasons, the products of others could infringe upon our patent rights. We may be
notified, from time to time, that we could be or we are infringing certain patents or other intellectual property
rights of others. Litigation, which could be very costly and lead to substantial diversion of our resources, even if
the outcome is favorable, may be necessary to enforce our patents or other intellectual property rights or to
defend us against claimed infringement of the rights of others. These problems can be particularly severe in
foreign countries. In the event of an adverse ruling in litigation against us for patent infringement, we might be
required to discontinue the use of certain processes, cease the manufacture, use and sale of infringing products,

12

expend significant resources to develop non-infringing technology or obtain licenses to patents of third parties
covering the infringing technology. We cannot be certain that licenses will be obtainable on acceptable terms, if
at all, or that damages for infringement will not be assessed or that litigation will not occur. The failure to obtain
necessary licenses or other rights or litigation arising out of any such claims could adversely affect our ability to
conduct our business as we presently conduct it.

We also attempt to protect our proprietary information with contractual arrangements and under trade secret

laws. We believe that our future success will depend primarily upon the technical expertise, creative skills and
management abilities of our officers and key employees in addition to patent ownership. Our employees and
consultants generally enter into agreements containing provisions with respect to confidentiality and employees
generally assign rights to us for inventions made by them while in our employ. Agreements with consultants
generally provide that rights to inventions made by them while consulting for us will be assigned to us unless the
assignment of rights is prohibited by the terms of any agreements with their regular employers. Agreements with
employees, consultants and collaborators contain provisions intended to further protect the confidentiality of our
proprietary information. To date, we have had no experience in enforcing these agreements. We cannot be certain
that these agreements will not be breached or that we would have adequate remedies for any breaches. Our trade
secrets may not be secure from discovery or independent development by competitors.

Government Regulations

We are subject to a variety of federal, state and local governmental regulations related to the use, storage,
discharge and disposal of toxic, volatile or otherwise hazardous chemicals used in our manufacturing process.
The failure to comply with present or future regulations could result in fines being imposed on us, suspension of
production or cessation of operations. Any failure on our part to control the use of, or adequately restrict the
discharge of, hazardous substances, or otherwise comply with environmental regulations, could subject us to
significant future liabilities. In addition, we cannot be certain that we or our suppliers have not in the past
violated applicable laws or regulations, which violations could result in required remediation or other liabilities.
We also cannot be certain that past use or disposal of environmentally sensitive materials in conformity with then
existing environmental laws and regulations will protect us from required remediation or other liabilities under
current or future environmental laws or regulations. Certain of the chemicals that we import are subject to
regulation by the U.S. Government. If we or our suppliers do not comply with applicable laws, we could be
subject to adverse government actions and may not be able to import critical supplies.

We are also subject to federal International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) laws which regulate the

export of technical data and export of products to other nations which may use these products for military
purposes. The failure to comply with present or future regulations could result in fines being imposed on us,
suspension of production, or a cessation of operations. Any failure on our part to control the use of, or adequately
restrict the discharge of, hazardous substances, or otherwise comply with environmental regulations, could
subject us to significant future liabilities. Any failure on our part to obtain any required licenses for the export of
technical data and/or export of our products or to otherwise comply with ITAR, could subject us to significant
future liabilities. In addition, we cannot be certain that we have not in the past violated applicable laws or
regulations, which violations could result in required remediation or other liabilities.

We are also subject to federal importation laws which regulate the importation of raw materials and

equipment from other nations which are used in our products. The failure to comply with present or future
regulations could result in fines being imposed on us, suspension of production, or a cessation of operations.

Investments in Related Businesses

We own 100% of the outstanding common stock of Forth Dimension Displays Ltd. (“FDD”) and we

consolidate the financial results of FDD within our consolidated financial statements.

13

We own 80% of the outstanding common stock of e-MDT America (“eMDT”) and we consolidate the

financial results of eMDT within our consolidated financial statements.

In the fourth quarter of 2016, we signed an agreement to acquire 12.5% of a joint venture for $1 million and

the contribution of certain intellectual property. The transaction is subject to closing conditions including
government approval.

In the fourth quarter of 2015, we increased our ownership in Kopin Software Ltd. (formerly Intoware Ltd.)

from 58% to 100% and acquired 17.5% of a new company by paying GBP 1 to a former employee and
transferring the rights of certain software programs to the new company. The former employee is a co-founder of
the new company.

We had a 12% interest in KoBrite, and accounted for our ownership interest using the equity method. We
recorded equity losses from our investment in KoBrite of $0.1 million and $0.4 million in fiscal years 2014 and
2013, respectively. During the second quarter of 2014, we wrote off our $1.3 million investment in Kobrite.

On January 16, 2013, we completed the sale of our III-V product line, including all of our interest in Kopin

Taiwan Corp (KTC). Previously we owned approximately 90% of KTC and consolidated the financial statements
of KTC as part of our financial statements. The Buyer renamed KTC to IQE Taiwan. One of our Directors is a
chairman of IQE Taiwan and owns approximately 1% of the outstanding common stock of IQE Taiwan.

We may from time to time make further equity investments in these and other companies engaged in certain
aspects of the display, electronics, optical and software industries as part of our business strategy. In addition, the
wearable computing product market is relatively new and there may be other technologies we need to invest in to
enhance our product offering. These investments may not provide us with any financial return or other benefit
and any losses by these companies or associated losses in our investments may negatively impact our operating
results. Three of our Directors have invested in a publicly-held company in which we have invested. The
investment is recorded on our consolidated balance sheet at approximately $300,000.

Employees

As of December 31, 2016, our consolidated business employed 167 full-time individuals and 7 part-time

individuals. Of these, 10 hold Ph.D. degrees in Material Science, Electrical Engineering or Physics. Our
management and professional employees have significant prior experience in semiconductor materials, device
transistor and display processing, manufacturing and other related technologies. However, our employees are
located in the U.S., Europe and Asia and the laws regarding employee relationships are different by jurisdiction.
None of our employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement. We consider relations with our
employees to be good.

Sources and Availability of Raw Materials and Components

We rely on third party independent contractors for certain integrated circuit chip sets and other critical raw
materials such as special glasses, wafers and chemicals. In addition, our higher-level CyberDisplay assemblies,
binocular display module, and other modules include lenses, backlights, printed circuit boards and other
components that we purchase from third party suppliers. Some of these third party contractors and suppliers are
small companies with limited financial resources. In addition, relative to the commercial market, the military
buys a small number of units which prevents us from qualifying and buying components economically from
multiple vendors. As a result, we are highly dependent on a select number of third party contractors and
suppliers.

In addition, we also are subject to rules promulgated by the Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) in 2012
pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 that require us to conduct
due diligence on and disclose if we are able to determine whether certain materials (including tantalum, tin, gold

14

and tungsten), known as conflict minerals, that originate from mines in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or
certain adjoining countries (DRC), are used in our products. The DRC minerals report for a calendar year is due
by the second quarter of the following calendar year and we are conducting appropriate diligence measures to
comply with such requirements.

Web Availability

We make available free of charge through our website, www.kopin.com, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K
and other reports that we file with the SEC, as well as certain of our corporate governance policies, including the
charters for the Board of Directors’ audit, compensation and nominating and corporate governance committees
and our code of ethics, corporate governance guidelines and whistleblower policy. We will also provide to any
person without charge, upon request, a copy of any of the foregoing materials. Any such request must be made in
writing to us, c/o Investor Relations, Kopin Corporation, 125 North Drive, Westborough, MA, 01581.

Executive Officers of the Registrant

The following sets forth certain information with regard to our executive officers as of March 10, 2017

(ages are as of December 31, 2016):

John C.C. Fan, age 73

Bor-Yeu Tsaur, age 61

•

•

President, Chief Executive Officer and
Chairman

Founded Kopin in 1984

•

•

Executive Vice President—Display
Operations

Joined Kopin in 1997

Richard A. Sneider, age 56

Hong Choi, age 65

•

•

Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

Joined Kopin in 1998

•

•

Vice President and Chief Technology
Officer

Joined Kopin in 2000

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Since inception, we have incurred significant net operating losses. As of

We have experienced a history of losses and have a significant accumulated deficit. In addition, we have
had negative cash flow from operating activities in 2016 and 2015 and we expect to have negative cash flow from
operating activities in 2017.
December 31, 2016, we have an accumulated deficit of $214.0 million. At December 31, 2016 (2016) and
December 26, 2015 (2015) we had $77.2 million and $80.7 million of cash and equivalents and marketable
securities, respectively. For the years 2016 and 2015 net cash used in operating activities was $26.2 million and
$16.9 million, respectively. The decline in our cash and equivalents and marketable securities is partially a result
of our research and development investments in Wearable products. Our products are targeted towards the
wearable market which we believe is still developing and we cannot predict how long the wearable market will
take to develop or if our products will be accepted if the market is created. Accordingly, we believe it is
important to continue to invest in research and development even during periods when we are not profitable. Our
philosophy and strategies may result in our incurring losses from operations and negative cash flow.

The market segment for our Wearable products may not develop or may take longer to develop than we
anticipate which may impact our ability to grow revenues. We have developed head-worn, voice and gesture
controlled, hands-free cloud computing headset systems which we intend to sell and license to customers and
various components for wearable devices which we intend to sell to customers as either a part of the license
arrangement or separately. We refer to our headset systems and components sold to customers for use in
wearable applications as our Wearable products. Our success will depend on the acceptance of wearable products

15

by consumers and in particular the widespread adoption of the headset format. We are unable to predict when or
if consumers will adopt wearable products. Customers may determine that the headset is not comfortable, weighs
too much, costs too much or provides too little functionality. In addition, the wearable headset products may be
accepted by consumers but Wearable product manufactures may choose to use our competitors’ products. Our
success in commercializing our Wearable products is very important in our ability to achieve positive cash flow
and profitability. If we are unable to commercialize our Wearable products we may not be able to increase
revenues, achieve profitability or positive cash flow.

Our revenues and cash flows could be negatively affected if sales of our Display products for military
applications significantly decline. Over the last several years a primary source of our military revenues has
been the sale of our display products to the military for use in thermal weapon sights. We currently are designed
in certain systems and are in qualification for other certain systems in the Family Weapon Sight (FWS) program,
which we believe is the next significant government procurement program that uses our technology. However
these programs are not expected to significantly increase in unit procurement until 2020. We may not be awarded
the systems we are in qualification for and for the system we are qualified for we may only be awarded a portion
of the program. In addition the government could postpone or cancel the programs. Our ability to generate
revenues and cash flow from sales to the U.S. military is dependent on our display products being qualified and
remaining qualified in the FWS and other U.S. military programs and the U.S. military funding these programs.
Our ability to generate revenues and cash flow from sales to the U.S. military is also dependent on winning
contracts in competition against our competitors. If we are unable to be qualified into new U.S. military
programs, remain qualified in existing programs, win orders against our competition or military programs are not
funded our ability to generate revenues, achieve profitability and positive cash flow will be negatively impacted.

Our ability to manufacture and distribute our Display products would be severely limited if the foundries

that we rely on to manufacture integrated circuits for our Display products fail to provide those services. We
depend principally on a Taiwanese foundry for the fabrication of integrated circuits for our display products. We
have no long-term contracts with this foundry and from time to time we have been put on allocation which means
the foundry will limit the amount of wafers they will process for us. If the foundry was to terminate its
arrangement with us or become unable to provide the required capacity and quality on a timely basis, we may not
be able to manufacture and ship our display products or we may be forced to manufacture them in limited
quantities until replacement foundry services can be obtained. Furthermore, we cannot assure investors that we
would be able to establish alternative manufacturing and packaging relationships on acceptable terms.

Our reliance on this foundry involves certain risks, including but not limited to:

•

•

•

•

Lack of control over production capacity and delivery schedules;

Limited control over quality assurance, manufacturing yields and production costs;

The risks associated with international commerce, including unexpected changes in legal and
regulatory requirements, changes in tariffs and trade policies and political and economic instability;
and

Natural disasters such as earthquakes, tsunami, mudslides, drought, hurricanes and tornadoes.

Due to natural disasters such as earthquakes and typhoons that have occasionally occurred in Taiwan, many
Taiwanese companies, including the Taiwanese foundry we use, have experienced related business interruptions.
Our business could suffer significantly if either of the foundries we use had operations which were disrupted for
an extended period of time due to natural disaster, political unrest or financial instability.

We depend on third parties to provide integrated circuit chip sets and critical raw materials for use with our

headset systems and components and we periodically receive “end of life” notices from suppliers that they will
no longer be providing a raw material. We do not manufacture the integrated circuit chip sets which are used
to electronically interface between our display products and our customer’s products. Instead, we rely on third
party independent contractors for these integrated circuit chip sets. We purchase critical raw materials such as

16

special glasses, special SOI wafers, adhesives, chemicals, lenses, backlights, printed circuit boards and other
components from third party suppliers. Some of these third party contractors and suppliers are small companies
with limited financial resources. In addition, relative to the commercial market, the military buys a small number
of units which prevents us from qualifying and buying components economically from multiple vendors. We
periodically receive notices from suppliers of our critical raw materials regarding their plans to stop selling the
raw materials. This requires us to identify another raw material and/or raw material supplier, to replace the
discontinued item/supplier. We then have to internally re-qualify the product with the new material and we may
be required to re-qualify the product with our customer. If any of these third party contractors or suppliers were
unable or unwilling to supply these integrated circuit chip sets or critical raw materials to us, whether for
business or regulatory reasons, we would be unable to manufacture and sell our display products until a
replacement material could be found. We may not be able to find a replacement material or chemical or if we are
able to find a replacement material we may be unable to sell our products until they have been qualified both
internally and with the customer. Lower volume purchases may make it uneconomical for some of our suppliers
to provide raw materials we need. We cannot assure investors that a replacement third party contractor or
supplier could be found on reasonable terms or in a timely manner. Any interruption in our ability to manufacture
and distribute our display products could cause our display business to be unsuccessful and the value of
investors’ investment in us may decline.

The markets in which we operate are highly competitive and rapidly changing and we may be unable to

compete successfully.
our targeted markets.

There are a number of companies that develop or may develop products that compete in

The individual components that we offer for sale (displays, optical lenses, backlights and ASICs, Whisper)

are also offered by companies whose sole business is the individual component. For example, there are
companies whose sole business is to sell optical lenses. Accordingly, our strategy requires us to develop
technologies and to compete in multiple markets. Some of our competitors are much larger than we are and have
significantly greater financial, development and marketing resources than we do. The competition in these
markets could adversely affect our operating results by reducing the volume of the products we sell or the prices
we can charge. These competitors may be able to respond more rapidly than we can to new or emerging
technologies or changes in customer requirements. They may also devote greater resources to the development,
promotion and sale of their products than we do.

Our success will depend substantially upon our ability to enhance our products and technologies and to

develop and introduce, on a timely and cost-effective basis, new products and features that meet changing
customer requirements and incorporate technological enhancements. If we are unable to develop new products
and enhance functionalities or technologies to adapt to these changes, our business will suffer.

Disruptions of our production of our Display products would adversely affect our operating results.
If we
were to experience any significant disruption in the operation of our facilities, we would be unable to supply our
display products to our customers. Many of our sales contracts include financial penalties for late delivery. In the
past, we experienced several power outages at our facilities which ranged in duration from one to four days. We
have certain critical pieces of equipment necessary to operate the facility which are no longer offered for sale and
we may not have service contracts or spare parts for the equipment. Additionally, as we introduce new equipment
into our manufacturing processes, our display products could be subject to especially wide variations in
manufacturing yields and efficiency. We may experience manufacturing problems that would result in delays in
product introduction and delivery or yield fluctuations.

A disruption to our information technology systems could significantly impact our operations and impact
our revenue and profitability. Our data processing systems are cloud based and hosted by a third party. We also
use software packages which are no longer supported by their developer. An interruption to the third party
systems or in the infrastructure which allows us to connect to the third party systems for an extended period may
impact our ability to operate the businesses and process transactions which could result in a decline in sales and
affect our ability to achieve or maintain profitability.

17

If our information technology security systems are penetrated and confidential and or proprietary
information were taken we could be subject to fines, law suits and loss of customers. Significantly larger
organizations with much greater resources than us have been the victim of cybercrimes. We are routinely sent
emails which are probing our Internet security. We rely on our electronic information systems to perform the
routine transactions to run our business. We transact business over the Internet with customers, vendors and our
subsidiaries. We have implemented security measures to protect unauthorized access to this information. We
have also implemented security policies which limit access via the Internet from the company to the outside
world based on the individual’s position in the company. We routinely receive security patches for the software
we use from the software providers. Our primary concerns are inappropriate access to personnel information,
information covered under the International Traffic in Arms Regulation, product designs and manufacturing
information, financial information and our intellectual property, trade secrets and know-how. If our security
systems are penetrated and confidential and or proprietary information were taken we could be subject to fines,
law suits and loss of customers.

Our headset system is dependent on software which we have limited experience in developing, marketing or

licensing. Our headset systems include a combination of commercially available software and operating and
speech enhancement software that we internally developed or acquired. In addition we are offering Whisper Chip
which is an integrated circuit that contains software developed by us. We have little experience in developing,
marketing or licensing software. If we are unable to integrate internally developed or acquired software in our
headset system we may not be able to license the designs. The market demand for our headset systems or the
products our customers may develop based on our head set systems is dependent on our ability to collaborate
with software developers who write application software in order to create utility in our customer’s products. If
we are unable to develop, license or acquire software or if we or the market in general does not create a sufficient
body of application software our systems may not be accepted by the market and we may not be able to increase
revenues, achieve profitability or positive cash flow.

We license intellectual property rights of others.

Included in our headset concept systems is software

which we license from other companies. Should we violate the terms of a license, our license could be canceled.
The companies may decide to stop supporting the software we license or new versions of the software may not be
compatible with our software which would require us to rewrite our software which we may not be able to do.
The license fees we pay may be increased which would negatively affect our ability to achieve profitability and
positive cash flow. If we are unable to obtain and or maintain existing software license relationships our ability to
grow revenue and achieve profitability and positive cash flow may be negatively affected.

Our headset systems use software that we license from other companies (Licensors) and requires us to
access the Licensor’s data centers and interruptions or delays in service from data center hosting facilities could
impair our customer’s products. Any damage to, or failure of, the systems of our Licensors generally could
result in interruptions in service to our customers. Interruptions in service to our customers may reduce our
revenue, cause us to issue credits or pay penalties, cause customers to terminate their contracts and reduce our
ability to attract new customers.

The market for cloud-based applications may develop more slowly than we expect. Our success will
depend, to some extent, on the willingness of businesses to accept cloud-based services for applications that they
view as critical to the success of their business. Many companies have invested substantial effort and financial
resources to integrate traditional enterprise software into their businesses and may be reluctant or unwilling to
switch to a different application or to migrate these applications to cloud-based services. Other factors that may
affect market acceptance of our application include:

•

•

•

•

the security capabilities, reliability and availability of cloud-based services;

our ability to implement upgrades and other changes to our software without disrupting our service;

the level of customization or configuration we offer; and

the price, performance and availability of competing products and services.

18

The market for these services may not develop further, or may develop more slowly than we expect, either

of which would negatively affect our ability to grow revenues, achieve profitability and generate positive cash
flow.

We may not be successful in protecting our intellectual property and proprietary rights and we may incur
substantial costs in defending our intellectual property. Our success depends in part on our ability to protect
our intellectual property and proprietary rights. We have obtained certain domestic and foreign patents and we
intend to continue to seek patents on our inventions when appropriate. We also attempt to protect our proprietary
information with contractual arrangements and under trade secret laws. Our employees and consultants generally
enter into agreements containing provisions with respect to confidentiality and the assignment of rights to us for
inventions made by them while in our employ. These measures may not adequately protect our intellectual and
proprietary rights. Existing trade secret, trademark and copyright laws afford only limited protection and our
patents could be invalidated or circumvented. Moreover, the laws of certain foreign countries in which our
products are or may be manufactured or sold may not fully protect our intellectual property rights.
Misappropriation of our technology and the costs of defending our intellectual property rights from
misappropriation could substantially impair our business. If we are unable to protect our intellectual property and
proprietary rights, our business may not be successful and the value of investors’ investment in us may decline.

Our products could infringe on the intellectual property rights of others. Companies in wearable

computing and display industries steadfastly pursue and protect their intellectual property rights. This has
resulted in considerable and costly litigation to determine the validity of patents and claims by third parties of
infringement of patents or other intellectual property. Our products could be found to infringe on the intellectual
property rights of others. Other companies may hold or obtain patents on inventions or other proprietary rights in
technology necessary for our business. Periodically companies inquire about our products and technology in their
attempts to assess whether we violate their intellectual property rights. If we are forced to defend against
infringement claims, we may face costly litigation, diversion of technical and management personnel, and
product shipment delays, even if the allegations of infringement are unwarranted. If there is one or more
successful claims of infringement against us and we are unable to develop non-infringing technology or license
the infringed or similar technology on a timely basis, or if we are required to cease using one or more of our
business or product names due to a successful trademark infringement claim against us, our business could be
adversely affected.

Our business could suffer if we lose the services of, or fail to attract, key personnel.

In order to continue to

provide quality products in our rapidly changing business, we believe it is important to retain personnel with
experience and expertise relevant to our business. Our success depends in large part upon a number of key
management and technical employees. The loss of the services of one or more key employees, including
Dr. John C.C. Fan, our President and Chief Executive Officer, could seriously impede our success. We do not
maintain any “key-man” insurance policies on Dr. Fan or any other employees. In addition, due to the level of
technical and marketing expertise necessary to support our existing and new customers, our success will depend
upon our ability to attract and retain highly skilled management, technical, and sales and marketing personnel.
Competition for highly skilled personnel is intense and there may be only a limited number of persons with the
requisite skills to serve in these positions. If the display markets experience an upturn, we may need to increase
our workforce. Due to the competitive nature of the labor markets in which we operate, we may be unsuccessful
in attracting and retaining these personnel. Our inability to attract and retain key personnel could adversely affect
our ability to develop and manufacture our products.

Our customers who purchase display products for military applications typically incorporate our products
into their products which are sold to the U.S. government under contracts. U.S. government contracts generally
are not fully funded at inception and may be terminated or modified prior to completion, which could adversely
affect our business. Congress funds the vast majority of the federal budget on an annual basis, and Congress
often does not provide agencies with all the money requested in their budget. Many of our customers’ contracts
cover multiple years and, as such, are not fully funded at contract award. If Congress or a U.S. government

19

agency chooses to spend money on other programs, our customer contracts may be terminated for convenience.
Federal laws, collectively called the Anti-Deficiency Act, prohibit involving the government in any obligation to
pay money before funds have been appropriated for that purpose, unless otherwise allowed by law. Therefore, the
Anti-Deficiency Act indirectly regulates how the agency awards our contracts and pays our invoices. Federal
government contracts generally contain provisions, and are subject to laws and regulations, that provide the
federal government rights and remedies not typically found in commercial contracts, including provisions
permitting the federal government to, among other provisions: terminate our existing contracts; modify some of
the terms and conditions in our existing contracts; subject the award to protest or challenge by competitors;
suspend work under existing multiple year contracts and related delivery orders; and claim rights in technologies
and systems invented, developed or produced by us.

The federal government may terminate a contract with us or our customer either “for convenience” (for

instance, due to a change in its perceived needs) or if we default due to our failure or the failure of a
subcontractor to perform under the contract. If the federal government terminates a contract with our customer
our contract with our customers generally would entitle us to recover only our incurred or committed costs,
settlement expenses and profit on the work completed prior to termination. However, under certain
circumstances, our recovery costs upon termination for convenience of such a contract may be limited. As is
common with government contractors, we have experienced occasional performance issues under some of our
contracts. We may in the future receive show-cause or cure notices under contracts that, if not addressed to the
federal government’s satisfaction, could give the government the right to terminate those contracts for default or
to cease procuring our services under those contracts.

In addition, U.S. government contracts and subcontracts typically involve long purchase and payment
cycles, competitive bidding, qualification requirements, delays or changes in funding, extensive specification and
performance requirements, price negotiations and milestone requirements. Each U.S. government agency often
also maintains its own rules and regulations with which we must comply and which can vary significantly among
agencies.

Most of our military sales are on a fixed-price basis, which could subject us to losses if there are cost
overruns. Under a fixed-price contract, we receive only the amount indicated in the contract, regardless of the
actual cost to produce the goods. While firm fixed-price contracts allow us to benefit from potential cost savings,
they also expose us to the risk of cost overruns. If the initial estimates that we use to calculate the sales price and
the cost to perform the work prove to be incorrect, we could incur losses. In addition, some of our contracts have
specific provisions relating to cost, scheduling, and performance. If we fail to meet the terms specified in those
contracts, then our cost to perform the work could increase, which would adversely affect our financial position
and results of operations. Some of the contracts we bid on have “Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity” or
IDIQ provisions. This means we are bidding a fixed price but are not assured of the quantity the government will
buy or when it will buy during the term of the contract. This means we are exposed to the risk of price increases
for labor, overhead and raw materials during the term of the contract. We may incur losses on fixed-price and
IDIQ contracts that we had expected to be profitable, or such contracts may be less profitable than expected,
which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash
flows.

We generally do not have long-term contracts with our customers, which makes forecasting our revenues

and operating results difficult. We generally do not enter into long-term agreements with our customers
obligating them to purchase our products. Our business is characterized by short-term purchase orders and
shipment schedules and we generally permit orders to be canceled or rescheduled before shipment without
significant penalty. As a result, our customers may cease purchasing our products at any time, which makes
forecasting our revenues difficult. In addition, due to the absence of substantial non-cancelable backlog, we
typically plan our production and inventory levels based on internal forecasts of customer demand, which are
highly unpredictable and can fluctuate substantially. Our operating results are difficult to forecast because we are

20

continuing to invest in capital equipment and increasing our operating expenses for new product development. If
we fail to accurately forecast our revenues and operating results, our business may not be successful and the
value of investors’ investment in us may decline.

If we fail to keep pace with changing technologies, we may lose customers. Rapidly changing customer
requirements, evolving technologies and industry standards characterize our industries. To achieve our goals, we
need to enhance our existing products and develop and market new products that keep pace with continuing
changes in industry standards, requirements and customer preferences. If we cannot keep pace with these
changes, our business could suffer.

Fluctuations in operating results make financial forecasting difficult and could adversely affect the price of

our common stock. Our quarterly and annual revenues and operating results may fluctuate significantly for
numerous reasons, including:

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

The timing of the initial selection of our Wearable technology and display products as components in
our customers’ new products;

Availability of interface electronics for our display products;

Competitive pressures on selling prices of our products;

The timing and cancellation of customer orders;

Our ability to introduce new products and technologies on a timely basis;

Our ability to successfully reduce costs;

The cancellation of U.S. government contracts; and

Our ability to secure agreements from our major customers for the purchase of our products.

We typically plan our production and inventory levels based on internal forecasts of customer demand,
which are highly unpredictable and can fluctuate substantially. Our operating results are difficult to forecast
because the markets for our products are developing and we lack historical results from which to project demand.

As a result of these and other factors, investors should not rely on our revenues and our operating results for

any one quarter or year as an indication of our future revenues or operating results. If our quarterly revenues or
results of operations fall below expectations of investors or public market analysts, the price of our common
stock could fall substantially.

If we fail to comply with complex procurement laws and regulations, we could lose business and be liable

for various penalties or sanctions. We must comply with laws and regulations relating to the formation,
administration and performance of federal government contracts. These laws and regulations affect how we
conduct business with our federal government contracts. In complying with these laws and regulations, we may
incur additional costs, and non-compliance may also allow for the assignment of fines and penalties, including
contractual damages. Among the more significant laws and regulations affecting our business are the following:

•

•

•

•

The Federal Acquisition Regulation, which comprehensively regulates the formation, administration
and performance of federal government contracts;

The Truth in Negotiations Act, which requires certification and disclosure of all cost and pricing data in
connection with contract negotiations;

The Cost Accounting Standards and Cost Principles, which impose accounting requirements that
govern our right to reimbursement under certain cost-based federal government contracts; and

Laws, regulations and executive orders restricting the use and dissemination of information classified
for national security purposes and the export of certain products, services and technical data. We

21

engage in international work falling under the jurisdiction of U.S. export control laws. Failure to
comply with these control regimes can lead to severe penalties, both civil and criminal, and can include
debarment from contracting with the U.S. government.

Our contracting agency customers may review our performance under and compliance with the terms of our
federal government contracts. If a government review or investigation uncovers improper or illegal activities, we
may be subject to civil or criminal penalties or administrative sanctions, including

•

•

•

•

•

•

Termination of contracts;

Forfeiture of profits;

Cost associated with triggering of price reduction clauses;

Suspension of payments;

Fines; and

Suspension or debarment from doing business with federal government agencies.

Additionally, the False Claims Act provides for potentially substantial civil penalties where, for example, a

contractor presents a false or fraudulent claim to the government for payment or approval. Actions under the civil
False Claims Act may be brought by the government or by other persons on behalf of the government (who may
then share a portion of any recovery).

If we fail to comply with these laws and regulations, we may also suffer harm to our reputation, which could

impair our ability to win awards of contracts in the future or receive renewals of existing contracts. If we are
subject to civil and criminal penalties and administrative sanctions or suffer harm to our reputation, our current
business, future prospects, financial condition, or operating results could be materially harmed.

The government may also revise its procurement practices or adopt new contracting rules and regulations,

including cost accounting standards, at any time. Any new contracting methods could be costly to satisfy, be
administratively difficult for us to implement and could impair our ability to obtain new contracts.

A decline in the U.S. government defense budget, changes in spending or budgetary priorities, prolonged

U.S. government shutdown or delays in contract awards may significantly and adversely affect our future
revenues, cash flow and financial results. The Budget Control Act of 2011 enacted 10-year discretionary
spending caps which are expected to generate savings for the U.S. government, a substantial portion of which
comes from Department of Defense baseline spending reductions. There remains much uncertainty about the
level of cuts that will be required for government fiscal year 2016 and the impact those cuts will have on
contractors supporting the government. In light of the current uncertainty, we are not able to predict the potential
impact of reduced military expenditures on our Company or our financial results.

Customer demands and new regulations related to conflict-free minerals may adversely affect us. The
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Act”) imposes new disclosure requirements
regarding the use of “conflict” minerals mined from the Democratic Republic of Congo and adjoining countries
in products, whether or not these products are manufactured by third parties. These new requirements could
affect the pricing, sourcing and availability of minerals used in the manufacture of semiconductor devices
(including our products). We will incur additional costs associated with complying with the disclosure
requirements, such as costs related to determining the source of any conflict minerals used in our products. Our
supply chain is complex and we may be unable to verify the origins for all metals used in our products. We
purchase materials from foreign sources and they may not cooperate and provide us with the necessary
information to allow us to comply with the Act. This may require us to find alternative sources which could delay
product shipments. We may also encounter challenges with our customers and stockholders if we are unable to
certify that our products are conflict free.

22

We may incur significant liabilities if we fail to comply with stringent environmental laws and regulations
and the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) or if we did not comply with these regulations in the
past. We are subject to a variety of federal, state and local governmental regulations related to the use, storage,
discharge and disposal of toxic or otherwise hazardous chemicals used in our manufacturing process. We are also
subject to federal ITAR laws which regulate the export of technical data and export of products to other nations
which may use these products for military purposes. The failure to comply with present or future regulations
could result in fines being imposed on us, suspension of production, or a cessation of operations. Any failure on
our part to control the use of, or adequately restrict the discharge of, hazardous substances, or otherwise comply
with environmental regulations, could subject us to significant future liabilities. Any failure on our part to obtain
any required licenses for the export of technical data and/or export of our products or to otherwise comply with
ITAR, could subject us to significant future liabilities. In addition, we cannot be certain that we have not in the
past violated applicable laws or regulations, which violations could result in required remediation or other
liabilities. We also cannot be certain that past use or disposal of environmentally sensitive materials in
conformity with then existing environmental laws and regulations will protect us from required remediation or
other liabilities under current or future environmental laws or regulations.

We may be unable to modify our products to meet regulatory or customer requirements. From time to time

our display products are subject to new domestic and international requirements such as the European Union’s
Restriction on Hazardous Substances (RoHS) Directive. Our customers are requiring that we are in compliance
with “all laws” in their terms and conditions. If we are unable to comply with these regulations we may not be
permitted to ship our products, which would adversely affect our revenue and ability to maintain profitability. In
addition if we are found to be in violation of laws we may be subject to fines and penalties.

We may pursue acquisitions and investments that could adversely affect our business.

In the past we have
made, and in the future we may make, acquisitions of, and investments in, businesses, products and technologies
that could complement or expand our business. If we identify an acquisition candidate, we may not be able to
successfully integrate the acquired businesses, products or technologies into our existing business and products.
Future acquisitions could result in potentially dilutive issuances of equity securities, the incurrence of debt and
contingent liabilities, amortization expenses and write-downs of acquired assets. In 2015, 2012 and 2011 we
increased our ownership of the outstanding shares of Kopin Software Ltd to 100%, acquired 80% of the
outstanding shares of eMDT Inc. and acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of FDD. If we are unable to
operate Kopin Software Ltd., eMDT and FDD profitably, our results of operations will be negatively affected.
We perform periodic reviews to determine if these investments are impaired, but such reviews are difficult and
rely on significant judgment about the company’s technology, ability to obtain customers, and ability to become
cash flow positive and profitable. We may take future impairment charges which will have an adverse impact of
on our results of operations.

Investors should not expect to receive dividends from us. We have not paid cash dividends in the past,
however, in the future we may determine it is in the best interest of the stockholders to do so. Historically our
earnings, if any, have been retained for the development of our businesses.

Our stock price may be volatile in the future. The trading price of our common stock has been subject to

wide fluctuations in response to quarter-to-quarter variations in results of operations, announcements of
technological innovations or new products by us or our competitors, general conditions in the wireless
communications, semiconductor and display markets, changes in earnings estimates by analysts or other events
or factors. In addition, the public stock markets recently have experienced extreme price and trading volatility.
This volatility has significantly affected the market prices of securities of many technology companies for
reasons frequently unrelated to the operating performance of the specific companies. These broad market
fluctuations may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

23

Nasdaq listing matters. We received notice from Nasdaq that our listing was deficient due to our failure to
timely file our Form 10-Q for the third quarter of 2016. On the date of the filing of this Form 10-K, we also filed
our Form 10-Q for the third quarter of 2016. We believe that we will regain compliance with Nasdaq with such
filing, but we have received no formal notification that we are in compliance with Nasdaq Listing Rule
5250(c)(1).

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2.

Properties

We lease our 74,000 square foot production facility in Westborough, Massachusetts, 10,000 square feet of

which is contiguous environmentally controlled production clean rooms operated between Class 10 and Class
1,000 levels. The lease expires in 2023. In addition to our Massachusetts facility, we lease a 5,800 square foot
design facility in Scotts Valley, California for developing prototypes of products incorporating our CyberDisplay
product and a 10,000 square foot facility in San Jose, California which houses our wearable computing Tech
center and ASIC development. These facility leases expire in 2018 and 2021, respectively. We also have leases
in Japan and Hongkong, which expire in 2017 and 2018 respectively.

FDD, our subsidiary in Scotland, leases 20,000 square feet in Dalgety Bay. This facility’s lease expires in
2019. Kopin Software Ltd., our subsidiary in the United Kingdom, leases a property which occupies an aggregate
of 7,000 square feet. This lease expires in 2017.

At this time we believe these properties are suitable for our needs for the foreseeable future.

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

We may engage in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Claims, suits, investigations

and proceedings are inherently uncertain and it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of such matters
and our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows could be affected in any particular
period.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

24

Part II

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities.

Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “KOPN.” The following
table sets forth, for the quarters indicated, the range of high and low sale prices for the Company’s common stock
as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market for the periods indicated.

Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016

First Quarter
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fourth Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Fiscal Year Ended December 26, 2015

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
First Quarter
Second Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Third Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Fourth Quarter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

High

Low

$2.83
2.40
2.54
2.96

$4.36
3.77
3.45
3.18

$1.60
1.58
2.04
1.99

$3.37
3.30
2.60
2.67

As of March 10, 2017, there were approximately 418 stockholders of record of our common stock, which

does not reflect those shares held beneficially or those shares held in “street” name.

In the past three years we have not sold any securities which were not registered under the Securities Act.

On December 28, 2016 Kopin Corporation agreed to sell 7.6 million unregistered shares of its common stock for
an aggregate purchase price of $24.7 million. The transaction is subject to standard closing conditions including
governmental approval.

We have not paid cash dividends in the past, nor do we expect to pay cash dividends for the foreseeable

future. We anticipate that earnings, if any, will be retained for the development of our businesses.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2016 about shares of the Company’s common

stock issuable upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights and available for issuance under our
existing equity compensation plans.

Plan Category

Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights (a)

Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights (b)

Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column a) (c)

Equity compensation plans approved by

security holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity compensation plans not approved by
security holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—

—

$—

$—

(1) Amount includes shares available under the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan.

563,562(1)

—

25

Company Stock Performance

The following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return for the Company,

the NASDAQ US Benchmark TR Index and the S&P 500 Information Technology index. The graph assumes
$100 was invested in each of the Company’s common stock, the NASDAQ US Benchmark TR Index and the
S&P 500 Information Technology index on December 31, 2011. Data points on the graph are annual. Note that
historical price performance is not necessarily indicative of future performance.

26

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

This information should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto,
and our “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7 of
this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We have revised the prior period amounts for the sale of the III-V product
line, which is reflected as discontinued operations.

Fiscal Year Ended

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

(in thousands, except per share data)

Statement of Operations Data:
Revenues:

Net component revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research and development revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 21,115
1,528

$ 28,163
3,891

$ 26,957
4,851

$ 20,575
2,323

$ 31,299
3,343

Total revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

22,643

32,054

31,808

22,898

34,642

Expenses:

Cost of component revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research and development—funded programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research and development—internal
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selling, general and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sale of property, plant & equipment
Impairment of intangible assets and goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Loss from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other income and (expense):

Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other (expense) income, net
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency transaction (losses) gains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment of investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on remeasurement of investment in Kopin Software Ltd.
. . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sales of investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

17,814
787
15,253
16,962
(7,701)
—

43,115

21,525
3,006
14,625
18,135
—
—

57,291

19,592
5,237
15,499
19,909
—
—

60,237

20,655
1,551
15,983
19,125
—
1,511

58,825

22,042
2,178
12,121
17,166
—
1,705

55,212

(20,472)

(25,237)

(28,429)

(35,927)

(20,570)

658
(448)
(673)
—
—
1,034

758
(210)
661
—
—
9,207

571

10,416

966
58
259
(1,319)
—
—

(36)

1,119
235
(387)
(5,000)
—
1,899

(2,134)

1,126
174
(1,032)
—
(558)
856

566

Loss before (provision) benefit for income taxes, equity losses in

unconsolidated affiliates and net (income) loss of noncontrolling interest . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Tax (provision) benefit

(19,901)
(3,130)

(14,821)
25

(28,465)
180

(38,061)
12,933

(20,004)
(1,099)

Loss before equity losses in unconsolidated affiliates and net (income) loss of

noncontrolling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity losses in unconsolidated affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Loss from continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(23,031)
—

(14,796)
(47)

(28,285)
(386)

(25,128)
(625)

(21,103)
(680)

$(23,031) $ (14,843) $ (28,671) $ (25,753) $ (21,783)
2,789

20,147

—

—

—

Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(23,031)

(14,843)

(28,671)

(5,606)

(18,994)

Net (income) loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(403)

150

459

896

632

Net loss attributable to the controlling interest

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(23,434) $ (14,693) $ (28,212) $ (4,710) $ (18,362)

Net loss per share:
Basic:

Continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Net loss per share: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Diluted:

Continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Net loss per share: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

$

$

$

(0.37) $

(0.23) $

(0.45) $

—

—

—

(0.40) $
0.32

(0.33)
0.04

(0.37) $

(0.23) $

(0.45) $

(0.08) $

(0.29)

(0.37) $

(0.23) $

(0.45) $

—

—

—

(0.40) $
0.32

(0.33)
0.04

(0.37) $

(0.23) $

(0.45) $

(0.08) $

(0.29)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:

Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

64,046
64,046

63,466
63,466

62,639
62,639

62,348
62,348

63,618
63,618

Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and equivalents and marketable debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Working capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 77,198
70,028
87,832
247
74,078

$ 80,711
89,879
106,060
298
94,741

$ 90,859
86,682
122,941
311
109,847

$112,729
108,369
146,132
329
134,563

$ 92,485
106,791
176,209
946
155,086

Fiscal Year Ended

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

27

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and notes

to those statements and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The following discussion contains forward looking information that involves risks and uncertainties. Our actual
results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward looking statements as a result of a number of
factors, including the risks discussed in Item 1A “Risk Factors”, and elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.

Management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon
our audited consolidated financial statements. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make
estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those
related to revenue recognition under the percentage-of-completion method, bad debts, inventories, warranty
reserves, investment valuations, valuation of stock compensation awards, recoverability of deferred tax assets,
liabilities for uncertain tax positions and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and on
various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form
the basis for making judgments about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not apparent from other
sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions.

The prior period amounts have been revised for the impact of discontinued operations due to the sale of our
III-V product line, including our KTC subsidiary. Our financial results for prior periods have also been revised,
in accordance with U.S. GAAP, to reflect certain changes to the business and other matters.

We believe the following critical accounting policies are most affected by our more significant judgments

and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:

Revenue Recognition

We recognize revenue if four basic criteria have been met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists;

(2) delivery has occurred and services rendered; (3) the price to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and
(4) collectability is reasonably assured. We do not recognize revenue for products prior to customer acceptance
unless we believe the product meets all customer specifications and has a history of consistently achieving
customer acceptance of the product. Provisions for product returns and allowances are recorded in the same
period as the related revenues. We analyze historical returns, current economic trends and changes in customer
demand and acceptance of product when evaluating the adequacy of sales returns and other allowances. Certain
product sales are made to distributors under agreements allowing for a limited right of return on unsold products.
Sales to distributors are primarily made for sales to the distributors’ customers and not for stocking of inventory.
We delay revenue recognition for our estimate of distributor claims of right of return on unsold products based
upon our historical experience with our products and specific analysis of amounts subject to return based upon
discussions with our distributors or their customers.

We recognize revenues from long-term research and development government contracts on the percentage-

of-completion method of accounting as work is performed, based upon the ratio of costs or hours already
incurred to the estimated total cost of completion or hours of work to be performed. Revenue recognized at any
point in time is limited to the amount funded by the U.S. government or contracting entity. We recognize revenue
for product development and research contracts that have established prices for distinct phases when delivery and
acceptance of the deliverable for each phase has occurred. In some instances, we are contracted to create a
deliverable which is anticipated to go into full production. In those cases, we discontinue the percentage-of-
completion method after formal qualification of the deliverable has been completed and revenue is then
recognized based on the criteria established for sale of products. In certain instances qualification may be
achieved and delivery of production units may commence however our customer may have either identified new
issues to be resolved or wish to incorporate a newer display technology. In these circumstances new units

28

delivered will continue to be accounted for under the criteria established for sale of products. Under certain of
our research and development contracts, we recognize revenue using a milestone methodology. This revenue is
recognized when we achieve specified milestones based on our past performance.

We classify amounts earned on contracts in progress that are in excess of amounts billed as unbilled

receivables and we classify amounts received in excess of amounts earned as billings in excess of revenues
earned. We invoice based on dates specified in the related agreement or in periodic installments based upon our
invoicing cycle. We recognize the entire amount of an estimated ultimate loss in our financial statements at the
time the loss on a contract becomes known.

Accounting for design, development and production contracts requires judgment relative to assessing risks,

estimating contract revenues and costs, and making assumptions for schedule and technical issues. Due to the
size and nature of the work required to be performed on many of our contracts, the estimation of total revenue
and cost at completion is complicated and subject to many variables. Contract costs include material, labor and
subcontracting costs, as well as an allocation of indirect costs. We have to make assumptions regarding the
number of labor hours required to complete a task, the complexity of the work to be performed, the availability
and cost of materials, and performance by our subcontractors. For contract change orders, claims or similar
items, we apply judgment in estimating the amounts and assessing the potential for realization. These amounts
are only included in contract value when they can be reliably estimated and realization is considered probable.
We have accounting policies in place to address these as well as other contractual and business arrangements to
properly account for long-term contracts. If our estimate of total contract costs or our determination of whether
the customer agrees that a milestone is achieved is incorrect, our revenue could be overstated and profits would
be negatively impacted.

Inventory

We provide a reserve for estimated obsolete or unmarketable inventory based on assumptions about future

demand and market conditions and our production plans. Inventories that are obsolete or slow moving are
generally fully reserved (representing the estimated net realizable value) as such information becomes available.
Our display products are manufactured based upon production plans whose critical assumptions include non-
binding demand forecasts provided by our customers, lead times for raw materials, lead times for wafer foundries
to perform circuit processing and yields. If a customer were to cancel an order or actual demand was lower than
forecasted demand, we may not be able to sell the excess display inventory and additional reserves would be
required. If we were unable to sell the excess inventory, we would establish reserves to reduce the inventory to its
estimated realizable value (generally zero).

Investment Valuation

We periodically make equity investments in private companies, accounted for on the cost or equity method,

whose values are difficult to determine. When assessing investments in private companies for an other-than-
temporary decline in value, we consider such factors as, among other things, the share price from the investee’s
latest financing round, the performance of the investee in relation to its own operating targets and its business
plan, the investee’s revenue and cost trends, the liquidity and cash position, including its cash burn rate and
market acceptance of the investee’s products and services. Because these are private companies which we do not
control we may not be able to obtain all of the information we would want in order to make a complete
assessment of the investment on a timely basis. Accordingly, our estimates may be revised if other information
becomes available at a later date.

In addition to the above, we make investments in government and agency-backed securities and corporate
debt securities. For all of our investments we provide for an impairment valuation if we believe a decline in the
value of an investment is other-than-temporary, which may have an adverse impact on our results of operations.
The determination of whether a decline in value is other-than-temporary requires that we estimate the cash flows

29

we expect to receive from the security. We use publicly available information such as credit ratings and financial
information of the entity that issued the security in the development of our expectation of the cash flows to be
received. Historically, we have periodically recorded other than temporary impairment losses, however we have
not done so recently.

Income Taxes

We have historically incurred domestic operating losses from both a financial reporting and tax return
standpoint. We establish valuation allowances if it appears more likely than not that our deferred tax assets will
not be realized. These judgments are based on our projections of taxable income and the amount and timing of
our tax operating loss carryforwards and other deferred tax assets. Given our federal operating tax loss
carryforwards, we do not expect to pay domestic federal taxes in the near term. It is possible that we could pay
domestic alternative minimum taxes and state income taxes. We are also subject to foreign taxes from our
Korean and U.K. subsidiary operations.

Our income tax provision is based on calculations and assumptions that will be subject to examination by
tax authorities. Despite our history of operating losses there can be exposures for state taxes, federal alternative
minimum taxes or foreign tax that may be due. We regularly assess the potential outcomes of these examinations
and any future examinations for the current or prior years in determining the adequacy of our provision for
income taxes. Should the actual results differ from our estimates, we would have to adjust the income tax
provision in the period in which the facts that give rise to the revision become known. Such adjustment could
have a material impact on our results of operations. We have historically established valuation allowances against
all of our net deferred tax assets because of our history of generating operating losses and restrictions on the use
of certain items. Our evaluation of the recoverability of deferred tax assets has also included analysis of the
expiration dates of net operating loss carryforwards. In forming our conclusions as to whether the deferred tax
assets are more likely than not to be realized we consider the sources of our income and the projected stability of
those sources and product life cycles.

Results of Operations

On January 16, 2013, we completed the sale of our III-V product line, including all of the outstanding equity

interest in KTC Wireless, LLC (KTC) a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, to IQE KC, LLC (IQE) and
IQE plc (Parent, and collectively with IQE, the Buyer). The aggregate sale purchase price was approximately
$70.2 million, after certain adjustments, including working capital adjustments. The gain on the sale, net of tax,
was $20.1 million. Under the terms of the purchase agreement, $55 million was paid to us in January 2013, $0.2
million was paid in April 2013 and the remaining $15 million was paid on January 15, 2016.

We are a leading developer, manufacturer and seller of miniature displays, optical lenses, ASICs (our
“components”) and software for integration into wearable products for sale as individual components or in
headsets we design and license. We use our proprietary semiconductor material technology to design,
manufacture and market our component products for use in highly demanding high-resolution portable military,
enterprise and consumer electronic applications, training and simulation equipment and 3D metrology
equipment. Our products enable our customers to develop and market an improved generation of products for
these target applications.

We have two principal sources of revenues: component revenues and research and development revenues.

Research and development revenues consist primarily of development contracts with agencies or prime
contractors of the U.S. government and commercial enterprises. Research and development revenues were $1.5
million, or 6.7% of total 2016 revenues, $3.9 million, or 12.1% of total 2015 revenues and $4.9 million, or 15.3%
of total 2014 revenues.

30

We manufacture transmissive microdisplays and reflective microdisplays. Our commercial and military

transmissive display production is being performed entirely in our Westborough, Massachusetts facility. FDD,
our wholly-owned subsidiary, manufactures our reflective micro-displays in its facility located in Scotland and it
is a reportable segment.

Because our fiscal year ends on the last Saturday of December every seven years we have a fiscal year

with 53 weeks. Our fiscal year 2016 was a 53 week year and 2015 and 2014 were 52 week years.

Fiscal Year 2016 Compared to Fiscal Year 2015

Revenues. Our revenues, which include product sales and amounts earned from research and development

contracts, for fiscal years 2016 and 2015, by category, were as follows:

Revenues by Category (in millions)

Military Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Wearable Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Industrial Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consumer Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research & Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2016

2015

$ 5.3
7.4
6.3
2.1
1.5

$22.6

$10.2
12.3
4.0
1.7
3.9

$32.1

Sales of our products for military applications decreased in 2016 because of a decrease in demand from the

U.S. government, primarily for our products used in Thermal Weapon Sights (TWS) program. We have been
qualified in certain weapon systems and are in qualification of other systems associated with the Family of
Weapon Sight (FWS) program. We have also been qualified for certain US military avionic helmet programs.
We are currently shipping under the LRIP (Low Rate Initial Production) phase of the FWS program and avionic
program. The FWS and avionic programs are expected to increase production for the next several years. There
are other firms offering products which compete against us in the military programs and all of the programs we
supply product to are subject to the US government military budget and procurement process. Accordingly, there
can be no assurances we will continue to ship under our military contracts.

We offer microdisplays, optical lenses, application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), backlights, and
Whisper™ audio chips for use in consumer, enterprise and public safety products and systems which are targeted
at amongst other areas augmented and virtual reality markets. We refer to the sale of microdisplays, optical
lenses, application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), backlights, and Whisper™ audio chips as our component
sales. We also offer headworn, voice and gesture controlled, hands-free headset system designs that include our
components and software for consumer and enterprise applications. The software technology includes but is not
limited to voice and gesture control, noise cancellation, and operating systems. We refer to our components and
system designs as Kopin Wearable technologies. Our strategy is to sell the components individually or license
the headset system designs and sell the various components included in the reference design as part of a supply
agreement. Some of the technologies included in our concept systems are components and software which we
license from other companies. We believe our ability to develop and expand the Kopin Wearable technologies
and to market and license our concept systems and components will be critical for us to achieve revenue growth,
positive cash flow and profitability. The markets Kopin Wearable technologies can already be used in have a
number of existing product offerings such as ruggedized lap-top computers and tablets and virtual reality
headsets offered by companies such as Samsung, Sony and Oculus. The companies that offer these products are
significantly larger than we are.

The increase in sales of our product for Industrial applications in 2016 as compared to 2015 is the result of an

increase in sales of our products to manufacturers of 3D metrology equipment. Our 3D metrology customers are
primarily located in Asia, and Chinese contract manufactures represent a significant market for 3D metrology
equipment. Accordingly, sales of 3D metrology equipment are tied to the strength of the Chinese manufacturing sector.

31

The increase in the Consumer Applications is the result of an increase in sales of our products for use in

recreational gun sights. The decrease in Research and Development revenues is the result a decrease in funding
from the U.S. government partially offset by an increase in funding by customers to develop wearable
technologies.

International sales represented 59% and 32% of product revenues for fiscal years 2016 and 2015,

respectively. Our international sales are primarily denominated in U.S. currency. Consequently, a strengthening
of the U.S. dollar could increase the price in local currencies of our products in foreign markets and make our
products relatively more expensive than competitors’ products that are denominated in local currencies, leading
to a reduction in sales or profitability in those foreign markets. In addition, our Korean subsidiary, Kowon, holds
U.S. dollars in order to pay various expenses. As a result, our financial position and results of operations are
subject to exchange rate fluctuation in transactional and functional currency. We have not taken any protective
measures against exchange rate fluctuations, such as purchasing hedging instruments with respect to such
fluctuations, because of the historically stable exchange rate between the Japanese yen, Korean won and the U.S.
dollar.

Cost of Component Revenues.

Cost of component revenues (in millions)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of component revenues as a % of net component revenues . . . . . . . . .

$17.8
84.4% 76.4%

$21.5

2016

2015

Cost of component revenues, which is comprised of materials, labor and manufacturing overhead related to

the production of our products increased as a percentage of revenues in 2016 as compared to 2015 due to a
decrease in the sale of our display products for military applications, which have higher margins than our other
products and lower overall volume of revenues which results in higher fixed overhead costs per unit.

Research and Development.

(in millions)

Funded . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Internal

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2016

2015

$ 0.8
15.2

$16.0

$ 3.0
14.6

$17.6

Research and development (R&D) expenses are incurred in support of internal display development

programs or programs funded by agencies or prime contractors of the U.S. government and commercial partners.
In fiscal year 2017, our R&D expenditures will be related to our display products, overlay weapon sights and
Kopin Wearable technologies. R&D revenues associated with funded programs are presented separately in
revenue in the statement of operations. R&D costs include staffing, purchases of materials and laboratory
supplies, circuit design costs, fabrication and packaging of display products, and overhead.

Funded R&D expense for 2016 decreased as compared to the prior year due to a reduction in programs with

customers developing products for Wearable Applications. The decrease occurred because the customers either
discontinued the programs or the products moved into the commercialization phase.

Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative (S,G&A) expenses consist of the

expenses incurred by our sales and marketing personnel and related expenses, and administrative and general
corporate expenses.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selling, general and administrative expense (in millions)
Selling, general and administrative expense as a % of revenues . . . . . . . . .

$17.0
74.9% 56.6%

$18.1

2016

2015

32

The decrease in S,G&A expenses in 2016 as compared to 2015 is primarily attributable to a decrease in

deferred compensation expense, professional fees and intangible amortization partially offset by an increase in
labor costs.

Other Income and Expense.

(in millions)

Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other (expense) and income, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency transaction (losses) gains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Subtotal

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Gain on sales of investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other income and expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2016

2015

$ 0.7
(0.4)
(0.7)

(0.4)

1.0
$ 0.6

$ 0.8
(0.2)
0.6

1.2

9.2
$10.4

Other income and expense, net, as shown above, is composed of interest income, foreign currency

transactions and remeasurement gains and losses incurred by our Korean and United Kingdom subsidiaries, gains
on sales of investments and the impairment of cost based investments. Additionally, in 2016, we recorded $0.5
million of expense for amounts stolen from Kowon. For 2016, we recorded $0.7 million of foreign currency
losses as compared to $0.6 million foreign currency gains for 2015. This was primarily attributable to increased
fluctuations in the U.S. dollar and GBP exchange rate. In 2015, we recorded a gain on the sale of investments of
$9.2 million consisting of gains from the sale of investments in Vuzix and Recon of $3.7 million and $5.5
million, respectively. In 2016 we recorded a final additional gain of $1.0 million on the sale of our investment in
Recon as a result of the release of amounts which were held in escrow at the time of the sale.

Tax provision. The provision for income taxes for the fiscal year ended 2016 of $3.1 million represents
$33,000 of state tax, $978,000 of tax for gain on sale of the Korean subsidiary’s building, $671,000 for uncertain
tax position, which includes potential interest and penalties of $296,000, and foreign withholding of
$1,448,000. For 2017, we expect to have movement in the foreign withholding tax relating to conversion rate
changes. We also expect to have a state tax provision in 2017.

Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest. We own approximately 93% of the equity of
Kowon and 80% of the equity of eMDT. In the fourth quarter of 2015, we increased our investment in Kopin
Software Ltd. from 58% to 100%. Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest on our consolidated statement
of operations represents the portion of the results of operations of our majority owned subsidiaries which is
allocated to the shareholders of the equity interests not owned by us. The change in the statement of operations
attributable to noncontrolling interest is the result of the change in the results of operations of Kowon, and eMDT
for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2016 and for the period of time during 2015 when we owned
58% of Kopin Software Ltd.

(in millions)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Kopin Software Ltd.
Kowon . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
eMDT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2016

2015

$—
0.3
0.1

$ 0.4

$ 0.1
—
—

$ 0.1

33

Fiscal Year 2015 Compared to Fiscal Year 2014

Revenues. Our revenues, which include product sales and amounts earned from research and development

contracts, for fiscal years 2015 and 2014, by category, were as follows:

Revenues by Category (in millions)

Military Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Wearable Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Industrial Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consumer Electronic Applications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research & Development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2015

2014

$10.2
12.3
4.0
1.7
3.9

$32.1

$14.3
6.2
3.7
2.8
4.8

$31.8

Sales of our products for military applications decreased in 2015 because of a decrease in demand from the

U.S. government, primarily for our products used in thermal weapon sights.

The increase in sales of our product for Industrial applications in 2015 as compared to 2014 is the result of
an increase in sales of our products to manufacturers of 3D metrology equipment. Our 3D metrology customers
are primarily located in Asia, and Chinese contract manufactures represent a significant market for 3D metrology
equipment. Accordingly, sales of 3D metrology equipment are tied to the strength of the Chinese manufacturing
sector.

The decrease in the Consumer Applications is the result of a decrease in sales of our products for use in
digital still cameras (DSCs). We believe the overall market for DSCs has been declining due to an increase in use
of cameras in smartphones. The decrease in Research and Development revenues is the result a decrease in
funding from the U.S. government partially offset by an increase in funding by customers to develop wearable
technologies.

International sales represented 32% and 38% of product revenues for fiscal years 2015 and 2014,

respectively. Our international sales are primarily denominated in U.S. currency. Consequently, a strengthening
of the U.S. dollar could increase the price in local currencies of our products in foreign markets and make our
products relatively more expensive than competitors’ products that are denominated in local currencies, leading
to a reduction in sales or profitability in those foreign markets. In addition, our Korean subsidiary, Kowon, holds
U.S. dollars in order to pay various expenses. As a result, our financial position and results of operations are
subject to exchange rate fluctuations in transactional and functional currency. We have not taken any protective
measures against exchange rate fluctuations, such as purchasing hedging instruments with respect to such
fluctuations, because of the historically stable exchange rate between the Japanese yen, Korean won and the U.S.
dollar.

Cost of Product Revenues.

Cost of component revenues (in millions)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cost of product revenues as a % of net component revenues . . . . . . . . . . . .

$21.5
76.4% 72.7%

$19.6

2015

2014

Cost of component revenues, which is comprised of materials, labor and manufacturing overhead related to

the production of our products increased as a percentage of revenues in 2015 as compared to 2014 due to a
decrease in the sale of our display products for military applications, which have higher margins than our other
products.

34

Research and Development.

(in millions)

Funded . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Internal

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2015

2014

$ 3.0
14.6

$17.6

$ 5.2
15.5

$20.7

Research and development (R&D) expenses are incurred in support of internal display development

programs or programs funded by agencies or prime contractors of the U.S. government and commercial partners.
In fiscal year 2016, our R&D expenditures will be related to our display products, overlay weapon sights and
Kopin Wearable technologies. R&D revenues associated with funded programs are presented separately in
revenue in the statement of operations. R&D costs include staffing, purchases of materials and laboratory
supplies, circuit design costs, fabrication and packaging of display products, and overhead.

Funded R&D expense for 2015 decreased as compared to the prior year due to a reduction in programs with

customers developing products for Wearable Applications. The decrease occurred because the customers either
discontinued the programs or the products moved into the commercialization phase.

Selling, General and Administrative. Selling, general and administrative (S,G&A) expenses consist of the

expenses incurred by our sales and marketing personnel and related expenses, and administrative and general
corporate expenses.

Selling, general and administrative expense (in millions)
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selling, general and administrative expense as a % of revenues . . . . . . . . .

$18.1
56.6% 62.6%

$19.9

2015

2014

The decrease in S,G&A expenses in 2015 as compared to 2014 is primarily attributable to a decrease in

deferred compensation expense, professional fees and intangible amortization partially offset by an increase in
patent expense.

Other Income and Expense.

(in millions)

Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other (expense) income, net
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency transaction gains . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2015

2014

$ 0.8
(0.2)
0.6

$ 0.9
0.1
0.3

Subtotal

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sales of investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment of investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1.2
9.2
—

1.3
—
(1.3)

Other income and expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$10.4

$—

Other income and expense, net, as shown above, is composed of interest income, foreign currency

transactions and remeasurement gains and losses incurred by our Korean and United Kingdom subsidiaries, gains
on sales of investments and the impairment of cost based investments. Additionally, in 2015, we recorded $0.3
million of expense for amounts stolen from Kowon. For 2015, we recorded $0.6 million of foreign currency
gains as compared to $0.3 million foreign currency gains for 2014. This was primarily attributable to increased
fluctuations in the U.S. dollar and Korean won currency exchange rate. In 2015, we recorded a gain on the sale of
investments of $9.2 million consisting of gains from the sale of investments in Vuzix and Recon of $3.7 million
and $5.5 million, respectively. In 2014, we recorded an impairment of $1.3 million related to the write-off of our
equity investment in KoBrite and $0.2 million of expense for amounts stolen from Kowon.

35

Equity losses in unconsolidated affiliates. Our equity losses in unconsolidated affiliates for 2014 consists
of our approximate 12% share of the losses of KoBrite for the first quarter of 2014, incurred prior to writing our
investment down to zero in the second quarter. During the twelve months ended December 27, 2014, we funded
the operations of one of our investments. The impact of this funding for the twelve month period ended
December 27, 2014 was approximately $0.3 million.

Tax provision. The benefit for income taxes for the fiscal year ended 2015 of $25,000 represents the net of

state tax and foreign withholding tax related to closing our Korean facilities. For 2016, we expect to have
movement in the foreign withholding tax relating to conversion rate changes. We also expect to have a state tax
provision in 2016.

Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interest. We own approximately 93% of the equity of
Kowon and 80% of the equity of eMDT. In the fourth quarter of 2015, we increased our investment in Kopin
Software Ltd. from 58% to 100%. Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest on our consolidated statement
of operations represents the portion of the results of operations of our majority owned subsidiaries which is
allocated to the shareholders of the equity interests not owned by us. The change in net loss attributable to
noncontrolling interest is the result of the change in the results of operations of Kowon, and eMDT for the twelve
month period ended December 26, 2015 and for the period of time during 2015 when we owned 58% of Kopin
Software Ltd.

(in millions)

Kopin Software Ltd. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
eMDT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2015

$ 0.1
—

$ 0.1

2014

$0.3
0.1

$0.4

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2016, we had cash and equivalents and marketable debt securities of $77.2 million and
working capital of $70.0 million compared to $80.7 million and $89.9 million, respectively, as of December 26,
2015. The change in cash and equivalents and marketable securities was primarily due to cash used in operating
activities of $26.2 million and the repurchase of our common stock for withholding tax purposes of $0.5 million
which was partially offset by cash received from investing activities of $22.8 million. The cash provided by
investing activities was primarily from the receipt of final installment of $15 million from the 2013 sale of our
III-V product line and investment in Kopin Taiwan Corporation and the sale of our Korean subsidiary plant and
land for approximately $8.1 million.

As of December 26, 2015, we had cash and equivalents and marketable debt securities of $80.7 million and
working capital of $89.9 million compared to $90.9 million and $86.7 million, respectively, as of December 27,
2014. The change in cash and equivalents and marketable securities was primarily due to cash used in operating
activities of $17.1 million and the repurchase of our common stock for withholding tax purposes of $1.1 million
which was partially offset by the sale of investments of $9.2 million.

On January 15, 2016, we received the $15 million note receivable which was the final payment associated

with the sale of our III-V product line and investment in Kopin Taiwan Corporation.

In December 2016 we entered into an agreement with a Chinese company to acquire 7,589,000 shares of

unregistered stock of the Company for approximately USD $24.7 million. The transaction is subject to standard
closing conditions and government approval.

36

Cash and marketable debt securities held in U.S. dollars at December 31, 2016 were:

Domestic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$57,913,388
9,377,679

Subtotal cash and marketable debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and marketable debt securities held in other currencies and converted to U.S. dollars . . . . . . .

67,291,067
9,906,829

Total cash and marketable debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$77,197,896

We have no plans to repatriate the cash and marketable debt securities held in our foreign subsidiaries FDD

and Kopin Software Ltd. and as such we have not recorded any deferred tax liability. In 2013, we ceased
operations at our Korean facility, Kowon. Kowon has approximately $17.9 million of cash and marketable debt
securities which we anticipate will eventually be remitted to the U.S. and accordingly we have recorded deferred
tax liabilities associated with its unremitted earnings.

We expect to expend between $2.0 million and $3.0 million on capital expenditures over the next twelve

months, primarily for the acquisition of equipment to support some of our production and research facilities.

As of December 31, 2016, we had substantial tax loss carry-forwards, which may be used to offset future
federal taxes due. We may record a tax provision in our financial statements but we may be able to offset some or
all of the amounts that are payable with our tax loss carry-forwards. We may be subject to alternative minimum
taxes, foreign taxes and state income taxes depending on our taxable income and sources of taxable income.

Historically we have financed our operations primarily through public and private placements of our equity

securities. Over the past several years we have used our cash and marketable securities on hand to fund the
business. We believe our available cash resources will support our operations and capital needs for at least the
next twelve months.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Seasonality

Our revenues have not followed a seasonal pattern for the past two years and we do not anticipate any

seasonal trend to our revenues in 2017.

Climate Change

We do not believe there is anything unique to our business which would result in climate change regulations

having a disproportional effect on us as compared to U.S. industry overall.

Inflation

We do not believe our operations have been materially affected by inflation in the last three fiscal years.

Contractual Obligations

The following is a summary of our contractual payment obligations for operating leases as of December 31,

2016:

Contractual Obligations

Total

Less than 1 year

1-3 Years

3-5 years

More than 5 years

Operating Lease Obligations

$5,746,000

$1,219,000

$1,965,000

$2,361,000

$201,000

37

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We invest our excess cash in high-quality U.S. government, government-backed (Fannie Mae, FDIC
guaranteed bonds and certificates of deposit) and corporate debt instruments, which bear lower levels of relative
risk. We believe that the effect, if any, of reasonably possible near-term changes in interest rates on our financial
position, results of operations and cash flows should not be material to our cash flows or income. It is possible
that interest rate movements would increase our unrecognized gain or loss on interest rate securities. Our
portfolio of marketable debt securities is subject to interest rate risk although our intent is to hold securities until
maturity. The credit rating of our investments may be affected by the underlying financial health of the
guarantors of our investments.

We are exposed to changes in foreign currency exchange rates primarily through our translation of our
foreign subsidiary’s financial positions, results of operations, and transaction gains and losses as a result of non-
U.S. dollar denominated cash flows related to business activities in Asia and the United Kingdom, and
remeasurement of U.S. dollars to the functional currency of our foreign subsidiaries. We are also exposed to the
effects of exchange rates in the purchase of certain raw materials whose price is in U.S. dollars but the price on
future purchases is subject to change based on the relationship of the Japanese Yen to the U.S. dollar. We do not
currently hedge our foreign currency exchange rate risk. We estimate that any market risk associated with our
international operations is unlikely to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or
results of operation.

We use Silicon wafers but do not enter into forward or futures hedging contracts.

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

The financial statements required by this Item are included in this Report on pages 45 through 68. Reference

is made to Item 15 of this Report.

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Not applicable.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our “disclosure controls and

procedures” (Disclosure Controls and Procedures), as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the
Exchange Act, as of December 31, 2016. The controls evaluation was conducted under the supervision and with
the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer (our principal executive officer) and
Chief Financial Officer (our principal financial officer). Disclosure Controls and Procedures are controls and
procedures designed to reasonably assure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the
Exchange Act, such as this Form 10-K, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC’s) rules and forms. Disclosure Controls and
Procedures are also designed to reasonably assure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. Our quarterly evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures includes
an evaluation of some components of our internal control over financial reporting, and internal control over
financial reporting is also separately evaluated on an annual basis for purposes of providing the management
report which is set forth below.

38

Conclusion of Evaluation

Based on the Disclosure Controls and Procedures evaluation, Kopin’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2016, our Disclosure Controls and Procedures were not
effective as a result of the material weaknesses that existed in our internal control over financial reporting
described below.

Notwithstanding the material weaknesses discussed below, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial

Officer have concluded that the consolidated financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all
material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Evaluation of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. A company’s internal control over
financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and
principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the Company’s Board of
Directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles and include those policies and procedures that:

•

•

•

Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company.

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the company; and

Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use
or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.

Our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2016 based on the criteria outlined in Internal Control-Integrated Framework
(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial

reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim
financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. During the course of our evaluation of
the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, management concluded that the Company did
not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting due to the identification of the following material
weaknesses as of December 31, 2016:

• We did not maintain effective controls related to segregation of duties with respect to the establishment
of bank accounts, cash disbursements, the cash reconciliation process, and posting of journal entries.

• We did not maintain effective controls related to the monitoring and oversight of accounting and

financial reporting functions and reviews of financial statements.

39

While these material weaknesses did not result in any material misstatement of our historical financial
statements, they did result in errors in income statement classifications for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2016 which were corrected by immaterial restatement of the financial statements included
in this Form 10-K.

Our independent registered public accounting firm that audited our consolidated financial statements
included in this Form 10-K has issued an adverse audit report on the Company’s internal controls over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2016. This report appears below.

Management’s Plan to Remediate the Material Weaknesses

Our Korean subsidiary had stopped production in 2013 and was maintained by a small staff, pending sale of

the facilities, which occurred in June of 2016. The Company seal, which was necessary to commit the
embezzlement, was removed from local management’s control by December 31, 2016 and now resides with an
independent party. Local management must now make requests of the Company’s corporate accounting
department to execute transactions. The Company’s corporate accounting department coordinates with the
independent party to execute any transactions. In addition enhanced reviews of bank statements, account
reconciliations and supporting analysis are being performed by the Company’s corporate accounting department.

Management believes that these efforts will effectively remediate the material weaknesses. However, the
material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting will not be considered remediated until the
new controls are fully implemented, in operation for a sufficient period of time and tested and concluded by
management to be designed and operating effectively, and we cannot provide any assurance that these
remediation efforts will be successful or that our internal control over financial reporting will be effective as a
result of these efforts. In addition, as the Company continues to evaluate and work to improve its internal control
over financial reporting, management may determine to take additional measures to address control deficiencies
or determine to modify the remediation plan described above. Management will test and evaluate the
implementation of these new processes and internal controls during its 2017 fiscal year to ascertain whether they
are designed and operating effectively to provide reasonable assurance that they will prevent or detect a material
error in the Company’s financial statements. Subject to the foregoing, management believes these remediation
efforts will be completed by December 30, 2017.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Except for the control deficiencies discussed above in this Item 9A that have been assessed as material

weaknesses as of December 31, 2016, there were no other changes in the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the
fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

40

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Kopin Corporation
Westborough, Massachusetts

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Kopin Corporation and subsidiaries (the

“Company”) as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated
Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The
Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for
their assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our
audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a
material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based
on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of,
the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and
effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of

collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be
prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal
control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial
reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or
interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. The following material
weaknesses have been identified and included in management’s assessment:

a)

b)

ineffective controls related to the segregation of duties over the establishment of bank accounts, cash
disbursements, cash reconciliation process and posting of journal entries and,

ineffective controls over the monitoring and oversight of financial accounting and reporting functions
and reviews of financial statements.

These material weaknesses were considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests

applied in our audit of the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the

41

year ended December 31, 2016, of the Company and this report does not affect our report on such financial
statements and the financial statement schedule.

In our opinion, because of the effect of the material weaknesses identified above on the achievement of the

objectives of the control criteria, the Company has not maintained effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework
(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

(United States), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2016, of the Company and our report dated March 22, 2017 expressed an unqualified
opinion on those financial statements and financial statement schedule.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 22, 2017

Item 9B. Other Information

None

42

Part III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The information required under this item is incorporated herein by reference from our Proxy Statement

relating to our 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”). We expect to file the Proxy
Statement with the SEC in April, 2017 (and, in any event, no later than 120 days after the close of our last fiscal
year), pursuant to SEC Regulation 14A.

Code of Ethics. We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the Code) that applies to all of

our employees (including our CEO and CFO) and directors. The Code is available on our website at
www.kopin.com. We intend to satisfy the disclosure requirement regarding any amendment to or waiver of a
provision of the Code applicable to any executive officer or director, by posting such information on our website.

Our corporate governance guidelines, whistleblower policy and the charters of the audit committee,

compensation committee and nominating and corporate governance committee of the Board of Directors as well
as other corporate governance document materials are available on our website at www.kopin.com under the
heading “Investors”, then “Corporate Governance” then “Governance Documents.”

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information required under this item is contained in our Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by

reference from the Proxy Statement.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder

Matters

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the Proxy Statement. Refer
also to the equity compensation plan information set forth in Part II Item 5 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the Proxy Statement.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference from the Proxy Statement.

43

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(1) Consolidated Financial Statements:

Part IV

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Consolidated Balance Sheets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Consolidated Statements of Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Page

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

(2) Financial Statement Schedule:

Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

76

Schedules other than the one listed above have been omitted because of the absence of conditions under
which they are required or because the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements
or the notes thereto.

(3) Exhibits

3.1

3.2

3.3

3.4

4

10.1

10.2

10.3

10.4

10.5

10.6

10.7

10.8

10.9

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation

Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation

Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation

Fifth Amended and Restated By-laws

Specimen Certificate of Common Stock

Form of Employee Agreement with Respect to Inventions and Proprietary Information

Kopin Corporation 2001 Equity Incentive Plan

Kopin Corporation 2001 Equity Incentive Plan Amendment

Kopin Corporation 2001 Equity Incentive Plan Amendment

Kopin Corporation 2001 Equity Incentive Plan Amendment

Kopin Corporation 2001 Equity Incentive Plan Amendment

Kopin Corporation 2001 Supplemental Equity Incentive Plan

Form of Key Employee Stock Purchase Agreement

License Agreement by and between the Company and Massachusetts Institute of Technology

dated April 22, 1985, as amended

10.10

Facility Lease, by and between the Company and Massachusetts Technology Park

Corporation, dated October 15, 1993

10.11

Joint Venture Agreement, by and among the Company, Kowon Technology Co., Ltd., and

Korean Investors, dated as of March 3, 1998

44

(2)

(5)

(5)

(8)

(1)

(1)

(7)*

(9)*

(10)*

(11)*

(13)*

(6)*

(1)*

(1)

(3)

(4)

10.12

Eighth Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and Dr. John

C.C. Fan, dated as of December 31, 2014

10.13

Kopin Corporation Form of Stock Option Agreement under 2001 and 2010 Equity Incentive

Plans

10.14

Kopin Corporation 2001 and 2010 Equity Incentive Plan Form of Restricted Stock Purchase

10.15

10.16

10.17

21.1

23.1

31.1

Agreement

Kopin Corporation Fiscal Year 2012 Incentive Bonus Plan

Kopin Corporation 2010 Equity Incentive Plan

Purchase Agreement, dated January 10, 2013, by and among Kopin Corporation, IQE KC,

LLC and IQE plc

Subsidiaries of Kopin Corporation

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted

Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2

Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant

to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1

Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2

Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant

to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101

The following materials from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2016, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language):
(i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations,
(iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss, (iv) Consolidated Statements of
Stockholder’s Equity, (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text

(16)

(12)*

(12)*

*

(14)

(15)

**

**

* Management contract or compensatory plan required to be filed as an Exhibit to this Annual Report on

Form 10-K.

** This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in
any filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before
or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any filing.

(1) Filed as an exhibit to Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 33-45853, and incorporated herein by

reference.

(2) Filed as an exhibit to Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 33-57450, and incorporated herein by

reference.

(3) Filed as an exhibit to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993 and

incorporated herein by reference.

(4) Filed as an exhibit to Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 27, 1998 and

incorporated herein by reference.

(5) Filed as an exhibit to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 1, 2000 and

incorporated herein by reference.

(6) Filed as an exhibit to Registration Statement on Form S-8, filed on November 13, 2011 and incorporated

herein by reference.

(7) Filed as an appendix to Proxy Statement filed on April 20, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference.
(8) Filed as an exhibit to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 18, 2016 and incorporated herein by

reference.

45

(9) Filed as an exhibit to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on August 16, 2002 and incorporated

herein by reference

(10) Filed as an exhibit to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on March 15, 2004 and incorporated herein

by reference.

(11) Filed as an exhibit to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on May 10, 2004 and incorporated herein

by reference.

(12) Filed as an exhibit to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2004 and

incorporated herein by reference.

(13) Filed as an exhibit to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on April 15, 2008 and incorporated herein

by reference.

(14) Filed with the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14 filed as of April 5, 2013 and

incorporated by reference herein.

(15) Filed as an exhibit to Current Report on Form 8-K on January 10, 2013 and incorporated herein by

reference.

(16) Filed as an exhibit to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 28, 2015 and

incorporated herein by reference.

46

KOPIN CORPORATION

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2016, December 26, 2015, and

Page

48
49

December 27, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

50

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the years ended December 31, 2016, December 26,

2015, and December 27, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

51

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2016, December 26,

2015, and December 27, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

52

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2016, December 26, 2015,

and December 27, 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

53
54

47

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Kopin Corporation
Westborough, Massachusetts

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Kopin Corporation and subsidiaries (the

“Company”) as of December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2016. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at
Item 15(2). These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statements and financial statement
schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial

position of Kopin Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015, and the results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion,
such financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements
taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

(United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the
criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 22, 2017 expressed an adverse opinion
on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting due to the material weaknesses identified.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
March 22, 2017

48

KOPIN CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

December 31,
2016

December 26,
2015

Current assets:

ASSETS

Cash and equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Marketable debt securities, at fair value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $136,000 and $153,000 in 2016

and 2015, respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unbilled receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Note receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property, plant and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property and plant held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 15,822,495
61,375,401

$ 19,767,889
60,942,891

1,664,488
34,707
3,302,112
341,144
853,757
—

83,394,104
2,976,006
844,023
618,139
—

1,487,633
87,340
2,512,473
437,586
920,410
15,000,000

101,156,222
2,677,103
946,082
461,416
819,263

Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 87,832,272

$ 106,060,086

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued payroll and expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued warranty . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Billings in excess of revenue earned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Asset retirement obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:

Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share: authorized, 3,000 shares; none

issued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Common stock, par value $.01 per share: authorized, 120,000,000 shares;

issued 79,648,618 shares in 2016 and 78,271,659 shares in 2015;
outstanding 64,538,686 in 2016 and 63,977,385 in 2015,
respectively . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additional paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Treasury stock (12,102,258 shares in 2016 and 2015, respectively, at

cost)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated other comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated deficit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Kopin Corporation stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Noncontrolling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

4,355,462
1,443,976
518,000
981,761
2,560,144
935,364
2,571,000

13,365,707
246,922

$

3,959,704
1,631,292
518,000
1,407,566
2,553,282

—

1,207,000

11,276,844
298,463

—

—

766,409
328,524,644

760,796
326,558,527

(42,741,551)
1,570,971
(214,042,787)
74,077,686
141,957

(42,741,551)
771,774
(190,608,671)
94,740,875
(256,096)

Total stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

74,219,643

94,484,779

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 87,832,272

$ 106,060,086

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

49

KOPIN CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

Fiscal year ended

Revenues:

2016

2015

2014

Net component revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research and development revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 21,115,125
1,527,441

$ 28,163,118
3,891,301

$ 26,956,741
4,850,724

22,642,566

32,054,419

31,807,465

Expenses:

Cost of component revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research and development-funded programs . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research and development-internal
Selling, general and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . .

17,814,271
786,867
15,252,794
16,961,773
(7,700,522)

21,524,826
3,006,352
14,625,061
18,134,580

—

19,592,149
5,236,791
15,499,230
19,908,020

—

Loss from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other income and expense:

Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other (expense) income, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency transaction (losses) gains . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sales of investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment of equity and cost investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Loss before (provision) benefit for income taxes, and equity
losses in unconsolidated affiliates and net (income) loss of
noncontrolling interest

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Tax (provision) benefit

43,115,183

57,290,819

60,236,190

(20,472,617)

(25,236,400)

(28,428,725)

658,384
(448,581)
(672,727)
1,034,396
—

758,153
(210,488)
661,192
9,206,919

966,403
58,537
258,725
—

—

(1,319,287)

571,472

10,415,776

(35,622)

(19,901,145)
(3,130,000)

(14,820,624)
25,000

(28,464,347)
180,000

Loss before equity losses in unconsolidated affiliates and net

(income) loss of noncontrolling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity losses in unconsolidated affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(23,031,145)

—

(14,795,624)
(47,443)

(28,284,347)
(386,442)

Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net (income) loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest . . . . .

(23,031,145)
(402,971)

(14,843,067)
149,651

(28,670,789)
458,745

Net loss attributable to the controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(23,434,116) $(14,693,416) $(28,212,044)

Net loss per share:

Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$
$

(0.37) $
(0.37) $

(0.23) $
(0.23) $

(0.45)
(0.45)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:

Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

64,045,675

63,465,797

62,638,675

Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

64,045,675

63,465,797

62,638,675

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

50

KOPIN CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

Fiscal years ended

Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive income (loss):

2016

2015

2014

$(23,031,145) $(14,843,067) $(28,670,789)

Foreign currency translation adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrealized holding gain (loss) on marketable securities . . . .
Reclassifications of gains in net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

809,099
33,464
(48,284)

(1,060,186)
104,362
(1,490,776)

(1,102,859)
681,346
(6,477)

Other comprehensive income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

794,279

$ (2,446,600) $

(427,990)

Comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(22,236,866)

(17,289,667)

(29,098,779)

Comprehensive (gain) loss attributable to the noncontrolling

interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(398,051)

(91,200)

570,977

Comprehensive loss attributable to the controlling interest

. . . . . .

$(22,634,917) $(17,380,867) $(28,527,802)

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

51

KOPIN CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common Stock

Shares

Amount

Additional
Paid-in
Capital

Treasury
Stock

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income

Accumulated
Deficit

Total Kopin
Corporation
Stockholders’
Equity

Noncontrolling
interest

Total
Stockholders’
Equity

Balance December 28,

2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74,593,483 $745,935 $320,511,458 $(42,442,932) $ 3,441,997
—
—

137,445
(8,431)

36,750
843,116

368
8,431

—
—

Exercise of stock options . . . .
Vesting of restricted stock . . .
Stock-based compensation

$(147,703,212) $134,553,246
137,812
—

—
—

$

9,939
—
—

$134,563,186
137,812
—

expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other comprehensive

income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition of eMDT . . . . . . .
Restricted stock for tax

withholding obligations . . .
Treasury stock purchase . . . . .
Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Balance December 27,

—

—
—

—

—
—

(290,142)

—
—

(2,901)
—
—

5,059,572

—
(101,382)

(972,968)

—

—
—

—

—
—

(298,619)

—

—

(315,758)

—

—
—
—

—

—
—

—
—

(28,212,044)

5,059,572

—

5,059,572

(315,758)
(101,382)

(112,232)
101,382

(427,990)

—

(975,869)
(298,619)
(28,212,044)

—
—

(458,745)

(975,869)
(298,619)
(28,670,789)

2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75,183,207 751,833 324,625,694
85,649
(12,270)

39,798
Exercise of stock options . . . .
Vesting of restricted stock . . . 1,226,992
Stock-based compensation

398
12,270

(42,741,551) $ 3,126,239
—
—

—
—

(175,915,255) 109,846,959
86,047
—

—
—

(459,656)

—
—

109,387,303
86,047
—

expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive loss . . . .
Acquisition of Kopin Software
Limited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Restricted stock for tax

—
—

—

—
—

—

3,373,479
—

(445,344)

withholding obligations . . .
Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(370,354)

—

(3,704)
—

(1,068,681)

—

—
—

—

—
—

—

(2,388,148)

33,683

—
—

—
—

—

(14,693,416)

3,373,479
(2,388,148)

—
(58,452)

3,373,479
(2,446,600)

(411,661)

411,663

2

(1,072,385)
(14,693,416)

—

(149,651)

(1,072,385)
(14,843,067)

Balance, December 26,

2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76,079,643 760,797 326,558,527
(7,368)

736,842

7,368

Vesting of restricted stock . . .
Stock-based compensation

expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other comprehensive loss . . . .
Restricted stock for tax

withholding obligations . . .
Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Balance, December 31,

—
—

—
—

2,482,326
—

(175,542)

—

(1,755)
—

(508,841)

—

(42,741,551)

771,774

(190,608,671)

—

—
—

—
—

—

—
—

—

(23,434,116)

—
799,197

—
—

94,740,875
—

(256,096)

—

94,484,779
—

2,482,326
799,197

—
(4,918)

2,482,326
794,279

(510,596)
(23,434,116)

—
402,971

(510,596)
(23,031,145)

2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76,640,943 $766,409 $328,524,644 $(42,741,551) $ 1,570,971

$(214,042,787) $ 74,077,686

$ 141,957

$ 74,219,643

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

52

KOPIN CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

Fiscal year ended

Cash flows from operating activities:

2016

2015

2014

Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

$(23,031,145) $(14,843,067) $(28,670,789)

Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accretion of premium or discount on marketable debt securities . . . . . . . . .
Stock-based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net gain on investment transactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on disposal of equipment
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Losses in unconsolidated affiliates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sale of equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign currency (gains) losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on sale of property and plant
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment of investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in allowance for bad debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other non-cash items . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in warranty reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Inventory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses and other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts payable and accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Billings in excess of revenue earned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

993,621
130,032
2,425,326
(1,034,396)

—
—
—
1,451,858
711,356
(7,700,522)

—
(17,000)
677,330
—

(39,629)
(1,527,602)
48,295
1,163,586
(425,805)

2,138,982
168,217
3,145,479
(9,206,919)
180,715
—
—
(75,000)
(455,614)

—
—

(112,500)
1,560,259
(200,000)

2,850,942
(8,484)
(207,421)
(2,632,385)
777,247

3,002,014
53,437
4,827,772
—
—
102,305
283,333
(230,725)
(96,819)
—
1,319,287
63,340
489,332
—

(1,286,407)
(1,520,824)
191,367
1,829,591
38,790

Net cash used in operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(26,174,695)

(16,919,549)

(19,604,996)

Cash flows from investing activities:

Proceeds from sale of marketable debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase of marketable debt securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sale of investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sale of equipment
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sale of III-V product line . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from sale of property and plant
Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

50,835,253
(51,828,988)
1,034,396
—
15,000,000
8,106,819
80,793
(394,897)

38,055,759
(22,835,740)
9,206,919
—
—
—
(1,772)
(1,122,808)

39,801,276
(19,867,896)

—
250,000
—
—
(38,134)
(1,489,986)

Net cash provided by investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

22,833,376

23,302,358

18,655,260

Cash flows from financing activities:

Treasury stock purchases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and warrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Settlements of restricted stock for tax withholding obligations . . . . . . . . . .

Net cash used in financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—
—

(510,596)

(510,596)

—
86,047
(1,072,385)

(298,619)
137,813
(975,869)

(986,338)

(1,136,675)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(93,479)

(264,383)

(34,454)

Net decrease in cash and equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(3,945,394)

5,132,088

(2,120,865)

Cash and equivalents:

Beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

19,767,889

14,635,801

16,756,666

End of year

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 15,822,495

$ 19,767,889

$ 14,635,801

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

Income taxes paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Supplemental schedule of noncash investing activities:

Construction in progress included in accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

$

723,000

$

50,000

$

(18,000)

— $

— $

373,000

See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

53

KOPIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results could differ from those estimates.

Fiscal Year

The Company’s fiscal year ends on the last Saturday in December. The fiscal years ended December 31,
2016 includes 53 weeks and December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014 include 52 weeks, and are referred to as
fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, herein.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly owned subsidiaries, a
majority owned 93% subsidiary, Kowon Technology Co., Ltd. (Kowon), located in Korea, and a majority owned
80% subsidiary, eMDT America Inc (eMDT), located in California (collectively the Company). In the fourth
quarter of 2015, the Company increased its investment in Kopin Software Ltd. (KSL) (formerly Intoware Ltd.)
from 58% to 100%. Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of
Operations represents the portion of the results of operations of which is allocated to the shareholders of the
equity interests not owned by the Company. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue if four basic criteria have been met: (1) persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred and services rendered; (3) the price to the buyer is fixed or
determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. The Company does not recognize revenue for products
prior to customer acceptance unless it believes the product meets all customer specifications and the Company
has a history of consistently achieving customer acceptance of the product. Provisions for product returns and
allowances are recorded in the same period as the related revenues. The Company analyzes historical returns,
current economic trends and changes in customer demand and acceptance of product when evaluating the
adequacy of sales returns and other allowances. Certain product sales are made to distributors under agreements
allowing for a limited right of return on unsold products. Sales to distributors are primarily made for sales to the
distributors’ customers and not for their stocking of inventory. The Company delays revenue recognition for its
estimate of distributor claims of right of return on unsold products based upon its historical experience with the
Company’s products and specific analysis of amounts subject to return based upon discussions with the
Company’s distributors or their customers.

The Company recognizes revenues from long-term research and development contracts on the percentage-

of-completion method of accounting as work is performed, based upon the ratio of costs or hours already
incurred to the estimated total cost of completion or hours of work to be performed. Revenue recognized at any
point in time is limited to the amount funded by the U.S. government or contracting entity. The Company
accounts for product development and research contracts that have established prices for distinct phases as if
each phase were a separate contract. In some instances, the Company is contracted to create a deliverable which
is anticipated to be qualified and go into full rate production stages. In those cases, the revenue recognition
methodology will change from the percentage of completion method to the units-of-delivery method as new
contracts are received after formal qualification has been completed. Under certain of its research and

54

KOPIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

development contracts, the Company recognizes revenue on a milestone methodology. This revenue is
recognized when the Company achieves specified milestones based on its past performance.

The Company classifies amounts earned on contracts in progress that are in excess of amounts billed as

unbilled receivables and classifies amounts received in excess of amounts earned as billings in excess of
revenues earned. The Company invoices based on dates specified in the related agreement or in periodic
installments based upon its invoicing cycle. The Company recognizes the entire amount of an estimated ultimate
loss in its financial statements at the time the loss on a contract becomes known.

Research and Development Costs

Research and development expenses are incurred in support of internal display product development

programs or programs funded by agencies or prime contractors of the U.S. government and commercial partners.
Research and development costs include staffing, purchases of materials and laboratory supplies, circuit design
costs, fabrication and packaging of experimental display products, and overhead, and are expensed immediately.

Cash and equivalents and Marketable securities

The Company considers all highly liquid, short-term debt instruments with original maturities of three

months or less to be cash equivalents.

Marketable debt securities consist primarily of commercial paper, medium-term corporate notes, and United

States government and agency backed securities. The Company classifies these marketable debt securities as
available-for-sale at fair value in “Marketable debt securities, at fair value.” The investment in GCS Holdings is
included in “Other Assets” as available-for-sale and at fair value. The Company records the amortization of
premium and accretion of discounts on marketable debt securities in the results of operations.

The Company uses the specific identification method as a basis for determining cost and calculating realized
gains and losses with respect to marketable debt securities. The gross gains and losses realized related to sales of
marketable debt securities were not material during fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014.

Inventory

Inventory is stated at the lower of cost (determined on the first-in, first-out method) or market and consists

of the following at December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015:

Raw materials . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Work-in-process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Finished goods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,986,491
1,186,162
129,459

$ 844,475
1,281,891
386,107

2016

2015

$3,302,112

$2,512,473

Property, plant and equipment

Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation and amortization are provided using the

straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally 3 to 10 years. Leasehold
improvements and leased equipment are amortized over the shorter of the term of the lease or the useful life of
the improvement or equipment. As discussed below, obligations for asset retirement are accrued at the time
property, plant and equipment is initially purchased or as such obligations are generated from use.

55

KOPIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Property and Plant held for sale

Assets held for sale as of December 26, 2015 consisted of land and buildings with a cost of $0.8 million

which were sold in the second quarter of 2016.

Product Warranty

The Company generally sells products with a limited warranty of product quality and a limited
indemnification of customers against intellectual property infringement claims related to the Company’s
products. The Company accrues for known warranty and indemnification issues if a loss is probable and can be
reasonably estimated, and accrues for estimated incurred but unidentified issues based on historical activity.
Accrued warranty costs and warranty claims are not material in the periods presented.

Asset Retirement Obligations

The Company recorded asset retirement obligations (ARO) liabilities of $0.2 million and $0.3 million at

December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015, respectively. This represents the legal obligations associated with
retirement of the Company’s assets when the timing and/or method of settling the obligation are conditional on a
future event that may or may not be within the control of the Company.

Beginning balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exchange rate change . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Ending balance

Income Taxes

2016

2015

$298,463
—
—
(51,541)

$311,187
—
—
(12,724)

$246,922

$298,463

The consolidated financial statements reflect provisions for federal, state, local and foreign income taxes.

The Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective
tax basis, as well as operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. The Company measures deferred tax assets and
liabilities using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary
differences and carryforwards are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and
liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The
Company provides valuation allowances if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not
that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Foreign Currency

Assets and liabilities of non-U.S. operations where the functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar are
translated from the functional currency into U.S. dollars at year end exchange rates, and revenues and expenses
are translated at average rates prevailing during the year. Resulting translation adjustments are accumulated as
part of accumulated other comprehensive income. Transaction gains or losses are recognized in income or loss in
the period in which they occur.

Net (Loss) Income Per Share

Basic net (loss) income per share is computed using the weighted-average number of shares of common
stock outstanding during the period less any unvested restricted shares. Diluted earnings per common share is

56

KOPIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

calculated using weighted-average shares outstanding and contingently issuable shares, less weighted-average
shares reacquired during the period. The net outstanding shares are adjusted for the dilutive effect of shares
issuable upon the assumed conversion of the Company’s common stock equivalents, which consist of
outstanding stock options and unvested restricted stock.

The following were not included in weighted-average common shares outstanding-diluted because they are

anti-dilutive or performance conditions have not been met at the end of the period.

Nonvested restricted common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,007,674 2,192,016 2,551,631
— 130,500

—

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,007,674 2,192,016 2,682,131

2016

2015

2014

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk other than
marketable securities consist principally of trade accounts receivable. Trade receivables are primarily derived
from sales to manufacturers of consumer electronic devices and wireless components or military applications.

The Company primarily invests its excess cash in government backed and corporate debt securities that

management believes to be of high credit worthiness, which bear lower levels of relative credit risk. The
Company relies on rating agencies to ascertain the credit worthiness of its marketable securities and, where
applicable, guarantees made by the Federal Deposit Insurance Company. The Company sells its products to
customers worldwide and generally does not require collateral. The Company maintains a reserve for potential
credit losses.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Financial instruments consist accounts receivable and certain current liabilities. These assets (excluding
marketable securities which are recorded at fair value) and liabilities are carried at cost, which approximates fair
value.

Stock-Based Compensation

The fair value of nonvested restricted common stock awards is generally the quoted price of the Company’s
equity shares on the date of grant. The nonvested restricted common stock awards require the employee to fulfill
certain obligations, including remaining employed by the Company for one, two or four years (the vesting
period) and in certain cases also require meeting either performance criteria or market condition. The
performance criteria primarily consist of the achievement of established milestones. For nonvested restricted
common stock awards which solely require the recipient to remain employed with the Company, the stock
compensation expense is amortized over the anticipated service period. For nonvested restricted common stock
awards which require the achievement of performance criteria, the Company reviews the probability of achieving
the performance goals on a periodic basis. If the Company determines that it is probable that the performance
criteria will be achieved, the amount of compensation cost derived for the performance goal is amortized over the
service period. If the performance criteria are not met, no compensation cost is recognized and any previously
recognized compensation cost is reversed. The Company recognizes compensation costs on a straight-line basis
over the requisite service period for time vested awards.

57

KOPIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

On February 13, 2015, the Company modified the termination date of certain restricted stock grants

previously made to Dr. Fan, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer. In 2011, the Company
granted Dr. Fan 260,000 shares of restricted stock which will vest upon the first 10 consecutive trading day
period following the grant date during which the Company’s common stock trades at a price equal to or greater
than $5.25 subject to acceleration upon the occurrence of an acceleration event. This grant was originally set to
terminate on September 12, 2016. In 2013, the Company granted compensation awards to Dr. Fan that consisted
of two grants of 150,000 shares of restricted stock each. One of the grants will vest at the end of the
first 10 consecutive trading day period following the grant date during which the Company’s common stock
trades at a price per share equal to or greater than $6.00. The other award will vest at the end of the
first 10 consecutive trading day period following the grant date during which the Company’s common stock
trades at a price per share equal to or greater than $7.00. Both were due to expire in 2023. On December 31,
2014, Dr. Fan entered into a 3-year employment agreement with the Company which expires on December 31,
2017. The Company has amended the three grants to now terminate on December 31, 2017, to be consistent with
Dr. Fan’s employment agreement.

In 2013, the Company granted a compensation award to its Chief Executive Officer that consisted of a grant

of 300,000 shares of restricted stock that would vest upon the Company shipping 25,000 units of a new display.
The Company shipped the displays in 2015 and the award vested.

The fair value of stock option awards is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton

option-pricing model. There were no stock options granted in fiscal years 2016, 2015 or 2014.

Comprehensive Loss

Comprehensive loss is the total of net (loss) income and all other non-owner changes in equity including

such items as unrealized holding (losses) gains on marketable equity and debt securities classified as available-
for-sale and foreign currency translation adjustments.

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income are as follows:

Cumulative
Translation
Adjustment

Unrealized Holding
Gain (Loss) on
Marketable
Securities

Acquisition of
Minority
Interest in KSL

Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income

Balance as of December 28, 2013 . . . . . . . . $ 2,524,701
(990,626)
Changes during year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

917,296
674,868

Balance as of December 27, 2014 . . . . . . . .
Changes during year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,534,075
(1,001,733)

1,592,164
(1,386,415)

Balance as of December 26, 2015 . . . . . . . .
Changes during year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

532,342
814,017

205,749
(14,820)

$ —
—

—
33,683

33,683
—

$ 3,441,997
(315,758)

3,126,239
(2,354,465)

771,774
799,197

Balance as of December 31, 2016 . . . . . . . . $ 1,346,359

$

190,929

$33,683

$ 1,570,971

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company periodically reviews the carrying value of its long-lived assets to determine if facts and
circumstances suggest that they may be impaired or that the amortization or depreciation period may need to be
changed. The carrying value of a long-lived asset is considered impaired when the anticipated identifiable
undiscounted cash flows from such asset are less than its carrying value. For assets that are to be held and used,
impairment is measured based upon the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds its fair value.

58

KOPIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Revenue from Contracts with Customers

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). This new standard outlines a single
comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and
supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. In addition, ASU
2014-09 provides guidance on accounting for certain revenue-related costs including, but not limited to, when to
capitalize costs associated with obtaining and fulfilling a contract. The standard also requires certain new
disclosures.

The Company is required to apply the guidance in ASU 2014-09 after January 1, 2018, including interim

periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating the expected impact of this new
guidance on its consolidated financial statements and available adoption methods.

Balance Sheet Reclassification of Deferred Taxes

The Company has adopted ASU 2015-17 prospectively and believes the standard will not have a material

effect on its financial position or earnings.

Leases

In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02 (Topic 842) Leases. Topic
842 supersedes the lease recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification Topic 840, “Leases”.
Under Topic 842, lessees are required to recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for most leases and
provide enhanced disclosures. Leases will continue to be classified as either finance or operating. Topic 842 is
effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2018.
Entities are required to use a modified retrospective approach for leases that exist or are entered into after the
beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements, and there are certain optional practical
expedients that an entity may elect to apply. Full retrospective application is prohibited and early adoption by
public entities is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the expected impact of this new guidance on its
consolidated financial statements. The Company has not yet made any decision on the timing of adoption or
method of adoption with respect to the optional practical expedients.

Compensation-Stock Compensation

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718):

Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. This guidance is intended to simplify the
accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of
awards as either equity or liabilities and classification on the statement of cash flows. The amendments in this
update are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016,
including interim periods within those annual periods, and early application is permitted as of the beginning of an
interim or annual reporting period. The Company has evaluated ASU 2016-09 and determined that its early
adoption did not have a material effect on its financial position or earnings.

Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash
Payments (Topic 230). The standard addresses the classification and presentation of eight specific cash flow

59

KOPIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

issues that currently result in diverse practices. This pronouncement is effective for annual reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2017. The amendments in this ASU should be applied using a retrospective
approach. The Company is currently evaluating the expected impact of this new guidance on its consolidated
financial statements and available adoption methods.

Financial Instruments—Overall

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments- Overall (Sub Topic 825-10). The
new standard provides guidance on the recognition and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities.
The guidance amends certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial
instruments. This standard is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years,
beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a
material effect on its financial statements.

Business Combinations

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805). The new guidance
clarifies the definition of a business that an entity uses to determine whether a transaction should be accounted
for as an asset acquisition (or disposal) or a business combination. The guidance is expected to cause fewer
acquired sets of assets (and liabilities) to be identified as businesses. The guidance is effective for fiscal years,
and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted
for transactions that meet certain requirements. The Company is evaluating the impact this standard will have on
its financial statements.

Intangibles—Goodwill and Other

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles- Goodwill and Other (Topic 350). The new

guidance simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairments by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill
impairment test. The guidance requires, among other things, recognition of an impairment loss when the fair
value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount. The loss recognized is limited to the total amount of
goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The guidance is effective for fiscal years, and for interim periods within
those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill
impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The Company is evaluating the impact this
standard will have on its financial statements.

2. Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following at December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015:

Useful Life

2016

2015

Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Life of the lease
Furniture and fixtures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equipment under construction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3-5 years

3 years

Accumulated depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 17,886,124
3,721,176
488,802
88,227

$ 18,765,548
3,659,559
789,067
312,916

22,184,329
(19,208,323)

23,527,090
(20,849,987)

Net property, plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 2,976,006

$ 2,677,103

60

KOPIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

In June 2016, the Company’s subsidiary Kowon sold its plant and the land on which the plant resided for

approximately $8.1 million and recognized a gain of $7.7 million. Kowon had ceased its production activities at
the facility in 2013. Other than the sales of the Kowon plant and land there were no material gains or losses on
disposals of long-lived assets in fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014. Depreciation expense for the fiscal years 2016,
2015 and 2014 was approximately $1.0 million, $1.5 million and $2.6 million, respectively.

3. Other Assets and Note Receivable

Marketable Equity Securities

As of December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015, the Company had an investment in GCS Holdings which

had a fair market value of $0.3 million and an adjusted cost basis of $0.0 million.

On February 25, 2015, the Company acquired approximately 251,000 shares of Vuzix common stock

through a cashless exercise of warrants. The Company received the warrants in August 2013 as part of a
restructuring of debt owed by Vuzix to the Company. Upon receipt of the warrants, the Company should have
recorded the value of the warrant of approximately $352,000 in its consolidated financial statements.
Subsequently, the Company should have marked to market the warrants at the end of each reporting period. Had
the Company recorded the warrants in its consolidated financial statements and marked to market the warrants as
of December 28, 2013 and December 27, 2014, the Company would have recorded gains in its statement of
operations of approximately $646,000 and $171,000, respectively. In the first quarter of 2015, the Company
recorded the warrants in its consolidated financial statements and as a result recorded a gain of approximately
$1.3 million with $817,000 attributed to prior periods. The value of the warrants as of August 2013,
December 27, 2014 and December 26, 2015 was determined using the Black-Scholes pricing model. The
Company does not believe the unrecorded gains were material to the consolidated financial statements as the loss
from operations for the fiscal years ended December 28, 2013 and December 27, 2014 were $35.9 million and
$28.4 million, respectively.

Non-Marketable Securities—Equity Method Investments

Equity losses in unconsolidated affiliates recorded in the consolidated statement of operations are as

follows:

KoBrite . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Ask Ziggy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total

$ —
$(47,443)
$(47,443)

$(102,305)
$(284,137)
$(386,442)

2015

2014

In the second quarter of 2014 the Company wrote-off its $1.3 million investment in KoBrite. Prior to the
write-off, the Company accounted for its 12% ownership interest in Kobrite using the equity method. One of the
Company’s directors is a member of the Board of Directors of Bright LED, principal investor of KoBrite.

In December 2013, the Company wrote down its investment of $2.5 million in Ask Ziggy. The Company

continued to fund Ask Ziggy during the first quarter of year ending December 26, 2015. During the twelve
months ended December 28, 2013, the Company recorded impairment charges of $2.5 million related to the
write-off of a cost based investment. There were no equity method investments in 2016.

The Company had a $15.0 million note receivable as a result of the sale of its III-V product line and

investment in KTC, which was paid on January 15, 2016.

61

KOPIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

On December 28, 2016 we entered into an agreement to establish a joint venture (JV Agreement-A) in
China. Under the terms of the JV Agreement the Company will contribute certain intellectual property and the
equivalent of USD $1 million in Renminbi for a minority equity ownership. The purpose of the joint venture is to
develop and market wearable products.

On December 28, 2016 we entered into a joint venture agreement (JV Agreement-B) to establish a strategic
relationship with a Chinese company under which the Company and the Chinese Company will provide services
for each other and jointly develop and manufacture products and the Chinese company is to acquire 7,589,000
shares of unregistered stock of the Company for approximately USD $24.7 million.

The JV Agreements A and B and the sale of the Company’s stock are both subject to standard closing
conditions and government approvals. The transactions related to these agreements were not finalized as of the
March 22, 2017.

The Company has a loan to a non-officer employee for approximately $140,000 at December 31, 2016 and

December 26, 2015, which is currently due.

4. Business Combinations

Kopin Software Ltd.

In the fourth quarter of 2015, the Company increased its ownership in Kopin Software Ltd. from 58% to

100% and acquired 17.5% in a new company by paying GBP 1 to a former employee and transferring the rights
of certain software programs to the new company. The former employee is a co-founder of the new company.
The Company has ascribed an immaterial amount to its investment in the new company.

eMDT

During the second quarter of 2014, the Company paid approximately $0.3 million to increase its ownership

in eMDT subsidiary increasing its ownership percentage from 51% to 80%. As of December 31, 2016, the
Company has an option to acquire the remaining equity of the Company for $200,000.

5. Goodwill and Intangibles

The Company’s goodwill balance is as follows:

Fiscal Year Ended

December 31,
2016

December 26,
2015

Beginning Balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change due to exchange rate fluctuations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 946,082
(102,059)

$976,451
(30,369)

Ending Balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 844,023

$946,082

The Company performs impairment tests of goodwill at its reporting unit level. The Company conducts its

annual goodwill impairment test on the last day of each fiscal year unless factors indicate that an impairment may
have occurred. As of December 31, 2016, the Company performed a qualitative analysis which determined there
was no impairment of the Company’s goodwill. Goodwill is included in the Kopin reportable segment.

The Company recognized $0.0 million, $0.6 million and $1.0 million in amortization expense for the fiscal
years ended December 31, 2016, December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014, respectively, related to intangible
assets.

62

KOPIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

6. Financial Instruments

Fair Value Measurements

Under accounting guidance, financial instruments are categorized as Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 based upon

the method by which their fair value is computed. An investment is categorized as Level 1 when its fair value is
based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets that the Company has the ability to
access at the measurement date. An investment is categorized as Level 2 if its fair market value is based on
quoted market prices for similar assets in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets in markets
that are not active, based on observable inputs such as interest rates, yield curves, or derived from or
corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means. An investment is categorized as Level 3 if
its fair value is based on assumptions developed by the Company about what a market participant would use in
pricing the assets.

The Company’s investments are either held by brokers or in the case of publicly-held corporation, by the
Company. The brokers who hold the Company’s investments provide periodic reporting on both the cost and fair
value of the securities. The Company performs various procedures to corroborate the fair value provided by the
brokers. Debt securities reflected in the table below include investments such as certificates of deposit,
commercial paper, corporate bonds, government bonds, and money market fund deposits. When the Company
uses observable market prices for identical securities that are traded in less active markets, its debt investments
are classified as Level 2. When observable market prices for identical securities are not available, the Company
prices the debt investments it owns using non-binding market consensus prices that are corroborated with
observable market data; quoted market prices for similar instruments; or pricing models, such as a discounted
cash flow model, with all significant inputs derived from or corroborated with observable market data. Non-
binding market consensus prices are based on quotes from brokers. The discounted cash flow model uses
observable market inputs, such as US treasury-based yield curves.

The following table details the fair value measurements within the fair value hierarchy of the Company’s

financial assets:

Fair Value Measurement at December 31, 2016 Using:

Total

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Money Markets and Cash Equivalents . . . . . . . .
U.S. Government Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate Debt
Certificates of Deposit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GCS Holdings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$15,822,495
36,091,261
7,557,029
17,727,111
331,454

$15,822,495
7,144,767
—
—
331,454

$

—
28,946,494
7,557,029
17,727,111

—

$77,529,350

$23,298,716

$54,230,634

$—
—
—
—
—

$—

Fair Value Measurement at December 26, 2015 Using:

Total

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Money Markets and Cash Equivalents . . . . . . . .
U.S. Government Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Corporate Debt
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Certificates of Deposit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
GCS Holdings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$19,767,889
46,464,663
6,886,495
7,591,733
232,037

$19,767,889
16,381,152
—
—
232,037

$

—
30,083,511
6,886,495
7,591,733

—

$80,942,817

$36,381,078

$44,561,739

$—
—
—
—
—

$—

63

KOPIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The corporate debt consists of floating rate notes with a maturity that is over multiple years but has interest
rates which are reset every three months based on the then current three month London Interbank Offering Rate
(3 month Libor). The Company evaluates the fair market values of these corporate debt instruments through the
use of a model which incorporates the 3 month Libor, the credit default swap rate of the issuer and the bid and
ask price spread of same or similar investments which are traded on several markets.

The carrying amounts of cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities
approximate fair value because of their short term nature. The carrying amount of accrued liabilities is classified
as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

Marketable Debt Securities

Investments in available-for-sale marketable debt securities are as follows at December 31, 2016 and

December 26, 2015:

U.S. government and agency

backed securities . . . . . . . . .
Corporate debt and certificates
of deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Amortized Cost

Unrealized Gains

Unrealized Losses

Fair Value

2016

2015

2016

2015

2016

2015

2016

2015

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$61,667,245

$61,120,471

$36,343,817

$46,586,224

$—

25,323,428

14,534,247

$—

—

$—

$(252,556) $(121,561) $36,091,261

$46,464,663

(39,288)

(56,019)

25,284,140

14,478,228

$(291,844) $(177,580) $61,375,401

$60,942,891

—

$—

The contractual maturity of the Company’s marketable debt securities is as follows at December 31, 2016:

U.S. government and agency backed securities . . . . . .
Corporate debt and certificates of deposits . . . . . . . . . .

$14,473,073
22,562,101

$16,690,738
2,722,039

$4,927,450
—

$36,091,261
25,284,140

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$37,035,174

$19,412,777

$4,927,450

$61,375,401

Less than
One year

One to
Five years

Greater than
Five years

Total

Other-than-Temporary Impairments

The Company reviews its marketable debt securities on a quarterly basis for the presence of other-than-

temporary impairment (OTTI).

If the Company determines that an OTTI has occurred it further estimates the amount of OTTI resulting

from a decline in the credit worthiness of the issuer (credit-related OTTI) and the amount of non credit-related
OTTI. Noncredit-related OTTI can be caused by such factors as market illiquidity. Credit-related OTTI is
recognized in earnings while noncredit-related OTTI on securities not expected to be sold is recognized in other
comprehensive income (OCI). The Company did not record any OTTI for the fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014.

7. Stockholders’ Equity and Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has stock-based awards outstanding under two plans. In 2001, the Company adopted a 2001

Equity Incentive Plan (the Equity Plan). The Equity Plan authorized 7,100,000 shares of common stock, to be
issued to employees, non-employees, and members of the Board of Directors (the Board). The Equity Plan had a
ten year life and therefore no new equity awards may be issued under this plan. In 2010, the Company adopted a
2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the 2010 Equity Plan) which authorized the issuance of shares of common stock to

64

KOPIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

employees, non-employees, and the Board. The 2010 Equity Plan has been subsequently amended to increase the
number of authorized shares to 11,600,000. The number of shares authorized under the 2010 Equity Plan is the
number of shares approved by the shareholders plus the number of shares of common stock which were available
for grant under the Equity Plan, the number of shares of common stock which were the subject of awards
outstanding under the Equity Plan and are forfeited, terminated, canceled or expire after the adoption of the 2010
Equity Plan and the number of shares of common stock delivered to the Company either in exercise of an Equity
Plan award or in satisfaction of a tax withholding obligation. The option price of statutory incentive stock options
shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the stock at the date of grant, or in the case of certain
statutory incentive stock options, at 110% of the fair market value at the time of the grant. The option price of
nonqualified stock options is determined by the Board or Compensation Committee. Options must be exercised
within a ten-year period or sooner if so specified within the option agreement. The term and vesting period for
restricted stock awards and options granted under the 2010 Equity Plan are determined by the Board’s
compensation committee.

The Company has approximately 500,000 shares of common stock authorized and available for issuance

under the Company’s 2010 Equity Plan.

In March 2013, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of the Company’s common

stock in open market or negotiated transactions through March 2014. During the period March 2013 through
March 2014 the Company purchased 2,241,121 shares of its common stock for $8,290,573.

The Company has no stock options outstanding at December 31, 2016. The intrinsic value of options
exercised in 2014 was approximately $26,000. The Company issued warrants to purchase 200,000 shares of the
Company’s stock at $3.49 which were exercised on a cashless basis in 2015.

Cash received from option and warrant exercises under all share-based payment arrangements was

approximately $0.0 million for fiscal year 2016. No tax benefits were realized during the three year period ended
2016 due to the existence of tax net operating loss carryforwards.

NonVested Restricted Common Stock

The Company has issued shares of nonvested restricted common stock to certain employees. Each award

requires the employee to fulfill certain obligations, including remaining employed by the Company for one, two
or four years (the vesting period) and in certain cases also meeting performance criteria. A summary of the
activity for nonvested restricted common stock awards as of December 31, 2016 and changes during the year
then ended is presented below:

Balance, December 26, 2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Shares

2,192,016
1,663,000
(110,500)
(736,842)

Balance, December 31, 2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,007,674

Weighted
Average
Grant
Fair Value

$3.82
2.40
3.21
3.17

$3.21

The forfeitures in 2016 were primarily due to fact that the performance criteria related to these awards were

not achieved.

65

KOPIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Stock-Based Compensation

The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense related to employee stock options and

nonvested restricted common stock awards for the fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014 (no tax benefits were
recognized):

Cost of component revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research and development
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selling, general and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 561,791
527,081
1,336,454

$ 729,715
776,946
1,638,818

$ 766,221
965,945
3,095,606

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$2,425,326

$3,145,479

$4,827,772

2016

2015

2014

Total unrecognized compensation expense for the nonvested restricted common stock as of December 31,

2016 is $5.9 million and is expected to be recognized over a period of two years.

8. Concentrations of Risk

Ongoing credit evaluations of customers’ financial condition are performed and collateral, such as letters of

credit, are generally not required. The following table depicts the customer’s trade receivable balance as a
percentage of gross trade receivables as of the end of the year indicated. (The symbol “*” indicates that accounts
receivables from that customer were less than 10% of the Company’s total accounts receivable.)

Customer

Percent of Gross
Accounts Receivable

2016

2015

Company B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Company D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Company G . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

19
21
18

21
15
*

Sales to significant non-affiliated customers for fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014, as a percentage of total

revenues, is shown in the table below. Note the caption “Military Customers in Total” in the table below
excludes research and development contracts. The Company sells its displays to Japanese customers through
Ryoden Trading Company. (The symbol “*” indicates that sales to that customer were less than 10% of the
Company’s total revenues.)

Customer

Sales as a Percent
of Total Revenue

Fiscal Year

2016

2015

2014

Military Customers in Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Company A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Company C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Company E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Company F . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Funded Research and Development Contracts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

24
*
*
12
20
7

32
18
22
*
*
12

45
26
11
*
*
15

66

KOPIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

9.

Income Taxes

The provision (benefit) for income taxes from continuing operations consists of the following for the fiscal

years indicated:

Current

2016

Fiscal Year

2015

2014

Federal
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total current provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Federal
State . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

— $

— $

33,000
1,656,000

1,689,000

50,000
—

50,000

—
50,000
—

50,000

(8,718,000)
(1,264,000)
2,308,000
9,115,000

(5,356,000)
(62,000)
188,000
5,155,000

(9,554,000)
(1,709,000)
411,000
10,622,000

Total deferred provision (benefit)

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,441,000

(75,000)

(230,000)

Total provision (benefit) for income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 3,130,000

$

(25,000) $ (180,000)

The provision for income taxes for the fiscal year ended 2016 of $3,130,000 represents $33,000 of state tax,
$978,000 of tax for gain on sale of the Korean subsidiary’s building, $671,000 for uncertain tax position, which
includes potential penalties of $30,000, interest of $266,000 and foreign withholding of $1,441,000.

US GAAP requires applying a ‘more likely than not’ threshold to the recognition and derecognition of
uncertain tax positions either taken or expected to be taken by Kopin’s income tax returns. The total amount of
our gross tax liability for tax positions that may not be sustained under a ‘more likely than not’ threshold
amounts to $374,000 as of December 31, 2016 including interest of $266,000.

Kopin’s policy regarding the classification of interest and penalties is to include these amounts as a

component of income to expense.

The following table sets forth the changes in Kopin’s balance of unrecognized tax benefits for the year

ended December 31, 2016.

($ in millions)

Unrecognized tax benefits—beginning balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross increases—prior year tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross increases—current year tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross decreases—FIN 48 liability release . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross decreases—expired statute of limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrecognized tax benefits—ending balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Net operating losses were not utilized in 2016, 2015 and 2014 to offset federal and state taxes.

2016

$ —
374,000
$ —
$ —
—
$374,000

67

KOPIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

The actual income tax provision (benefit) reported from operations are different than those which would
have been computed by applying the federal statutory tax rate to loss before income tax provision (benefit). A
reconciliation of income tax provision (benefit) from continuing operations as computed at the U.S. federal
statutory income tax rate to the provision for income tax benefit is as follows:

2016

Fiscal Year

2015

2014

Tax provision at federal statutory rates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State tax liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign deferred tax rate differential . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign withholding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Outside basis in Kowon, net unremitted earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Permanent items . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increase in net state operating loss carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Utilization of net operating losses for U.K. research and development
refund . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Provision to tax return adjustments and state tax rate change . . . . . . .
Tax credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-deductible 162M compensation limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-deductible equity compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Uncertain tax position for transfer pricing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other, net
Change in valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(6,965,000) $(5,187,000) $ (9,964,000)
33,000
371,000
(196,000)
(394,000)
(21,000)
(177,000)

22,000
(678,000)
1,441,000
958,000
259,000
(502,000)

33,000
153,000
(75,000)
(180,000)
(402,000)
(158,000)

(142,000)
(66,000)
(762,000)

—

(360,000)
671,000
139,000
9,115,000

719,000
264,000
(501,000)
40,000
(34,000)
—

148,000
5,155,000

1,089,000
(516,000)
(610,000)
196,000
(687,000)

—
74,000
10,622,000

$ 3,130,000

$

(25,000) $ (180,000)

Pretax foreign income (losses) from continuing operations were approximately $5,368,000, $(968,000) and
$(2,588,000) for fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Deferred income taxes are provided to recognize
the effect of temporary differences between tax and financial reporting. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities
consist of the following:

Fiscal Year

2016

2015

Deferred tax liability:

Foreign withholding liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign unremitted earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ (2,571,000) $ (1,207,000)
(2,701,000)

(3,659,000)

Deferred tax assets:

Federal net operating loss carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State net operating loss carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Foreign net operating loss carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Equity awards . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property, plant and equipment
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrealized losses on investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

46,968,000
2,129,000
1,375,000
2,258,000
7,495,000
814,000
3,535,000
5,823,000

28,984,000
1,913,000
2,430,000
2,249,000
6,768,000
1,113,000
3,240,000
3,667,000

Net deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

64,167,000
(66,738,000)

46,456,000
(47,663,000)

$ (2,571,000) $ (1,207,000)

68

KOPIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

As of December 31, 2016, the Company has available for tax purposes U.S. net operating loss carryforwards

(NOLs) of $134.0 million expiring 2021 through 2036. The Company has recognized a full valuation allowance
on its net deferred tax assets as the Company has concluded that such assets are not more likely than not to be
realized. The increase in valuation allowance during fiscal year 2016 was primarily due to an increase in U.S. net
operating loss carryforwards of $7.7 million generated in the current year and $10.3 million of net operating loss
carryforwards from the adoption of ASU No. 2016-09. The $5.2 million increase in valuation allowance during
fiscal year 2015 was primarily due to an increase in net operating losses. In fiscal year 2016 the Company
adopted ASU No. 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. Upon the adoption the
Company recorded a deferred tax asset of $10.3 million for the tax benefits from stock awards and recorded a
valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets until they are realizable.

The Company has suspended operations and terminated the majority of employees at its Korean subsidiary,

Kowon. The assets, primarily buildings and land have been sold. It is more likely than not that the Company’s
share of the net book value of its Korean investment would be repatriated to the U.S. resulting in a Korean
withholding tax of $2.6 million. As a result of the Company no longer being permanently reinvested in Korea, a
deferred tax liability for the unremitted earnings in the Korean subsidiary has been recorded for $3.7 million.

The Company’s income tax returns have not been examined by the Internal Revenue Service and are subject
to examination for all years since 2001. State income tax returns are generally subject to examination for a period
of three to five years after filing of the respective return. The state impact of any federal changes remains subject
to examination by various states for a period of up to one year after formal notification to the states.

International jurisdictions have statutes of limitations generally ranging from three to seven years after filing

of the respective return. Years still open to examination by tax authorities in major jurisdictions include Korea
(2008 onward), Japan (2008 onward), Hong Kong (2010 onward) and United Kingdom (2013 onward). The
Company is not currently under examination in these jurisdictions.

10. Accrued Warranty

The Company warrants its products against defect for 12 months. A provision for estimated future costs and

estimated returns for credit relating to warranty is recorded in the period when product is shipped and revenue
recognized, and is updated as additional information becomes available. The Company’s estimate of future costs
to satisfy warranty obligations is based primarily on historical warranty expense experienced and a provision for
potential future product failures. Changes in the accrued warranty for fiscal years 2016 and 2015 are as follows:

Fiscal Year Ended

December 31,
2016

December 26,
2015

December 27,
2014

Beginning Balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Claim and reversals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 518,000
440,000
(440,000)

$ 716,000
598,000
(796,000)

$ 716,000
798,000
(798,000)

Ending Balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 518,000

$ 518,000

$ 716,000

11. Employee Benefit Plan

The Company has an employee benefit plan pursuant to Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended. In 2016, the plan allowed employees to defer an amount of their annual compensation up to a
current maximum of $18,000 if they are under the age of 50 and $24,000 if they are over the age of 50. The

69

KOPIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Company matches 50% of all deferred compensation on the first 6% of each employee’s deferred compensation.
The amount charged to operations in connection with this plan was approximately $347,000, $324,000 and
$224,000 in fiscal years 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

12. Commitments and Contingencies

Leases

The Company leases various facilities. The following is a schedule of minimum rental commitments under

non-cancelable operating leases at December 31, 2016:

Fiscal Year ending,

2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2019 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2020 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2021 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thereafter

Amount

$1,219,000
1,031,000
934,000
902,000
843,000
817,000

Total minimum lease payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$5,746,000

Amounts incurred under operating leases are recorded as rent expense on a straight-line basis and

aggregated approximately $1.3 million in fiscal year 2016, $1.7 million in fiscal year 2015 and $1.7 million in
fiscal year 2014.

13. Litigation

The Company may engage in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Claims, suits,

investigations and proceedings are inherently uncertain and it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of
such matters and our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows could be affected in any
particular period.

14. Embezzlement and Immaterial Restatement

During the third quarter of 2016, the Company discovered embezzlement activities at its Korean subsidiary.

Based upon the results of forensic investigating procedures, we identified that the embezzlement activities
occurred from fiscal year 2011 through fiscal year 2016.

The amounts of the embezzlement by period are as follows:

Year

2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prior to 2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Amount

$ 480,000
338,000
213,000
558,000

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,589,000

In the annual financial statements for all years prior to 2016, the theft losses had been expensed, although

misclassified, as Cost of component revenues or Foreign currency transaction losses. Accordingly, the effects of

70

KOPIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

the embezzlement on all prior years are limited to misclassifications of the expenses within the Consolidated
Statements of Operations. The correction of such misclassifications does not change previously reported Net
losses or Accumulated deficit.

Although we do not believe such misclassifications are material to previously issued consolidated financial

statements, due to the sensitive nature of fraud and, for comparability purposes, we have restated previously
issued annual financial statements to reclassify embezzlement losses into other (expense) income net. The effects
of the corrections are as follows:

Year

Cost of
component
revenues

Foreign
currency
transaction
(losses)
gains

Other
(expense)
income, net

2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(85,000)
(46,000)

$(253,000)
(167,000)

$(338,000)
(213,000)

The family of the embezzler has contributed certain assets as reparations. In addition, the Company has

insurance to cover employee fraud. Whether the Company can collect the insurance and keep the assets is
pending civil and criminal investigations against the embezzler. The value of the assets recovered, if any, will be
recorded during the period in which settlement is determined to be probable.

15.

Segments and Geographical Information

The Company’s chief operating decision maker is its Chief Executive Officer. The Company has determined

it has two reportable segments, FDD, the manufacturer of its reflective display products for test and simulation
products, and Kopin, which is comprised of Kopin Corporation, Kowon, Kopin Software Ltd. and eMDT. (in
thousands)

Kopin

FDD

Total

2016
Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net loss attributable to the controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-lived assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 18,733
(22,623)
86,084
2,976

$ 3,909
(812)
1,748
—

$ 22,643
(23,434)
87,832
2,976

2015
Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net loss attributable to the controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-lived assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property and plant held for sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 28,538
(13,429)
104,536
2,639
819

$ 3,516
(1,264)
1,524
38
—

$ 32,054
(14,693)
106,060
2,677
819

2014
Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net loss attributable to the controlling interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-lived assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 28,333
(26,402)
121,300
4,343

$ 3,474
(1,810)
1,641
246

$ 31,807
(28,212)
122,941
4,589

71

KOPIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Geographical revenue information for the three years ended December 31, 2016, December 26, 2015 and

December 27, 2014 was based on the location of the customers and is as follows: (in thousands)

2016

Fiscal Year

2015

2014

Revenue % of Total Revenue % of Total Revenue % of Total

US . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other Americas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 9,237
41

41% $21,758
395
— %

68% $19,695
416
1%

Total Americas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Asia-Pacific . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Europe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

9,278

9,849
3,516

41%

43%
16%

22,153

7,160
2,741

69%

22%
9%

20,111

8,245
3,451

62%
1%

63%

26%
11%

Total Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$22,643

100% $32,054

100% $31,807

100%

Long-lived assets by geographic area are as follows: (in thousands)

United States of America . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
United Kingdom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Fiscal Years

2016

2015

$2,976
—

$2,976

$2,613
64

$2,677

16. Selected Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)

The following tables present Kopin’s quarterly operating results for the fiscal years ended December 31,

2016 and December 26, 2015. The information for each of these quarters is unaudited and has been prepared on
the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements. In the opinion of management, all necessary
adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, have been included to present fairly the unaudited
consolidated quarterly results when read in conjunction with Kopin’s audited consolidated financial statements
and related notes. These operating results are not necessarily indicative of the results of any future period.

Quarterly Periods During Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016:

Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross profit (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net (loss) gain attributable to the controlling interest . . . .
Net (loss) gain per share (1):

Three months
ended
March 26,
2016

Three months
ended
June 25,
2016 (3)

Three months
ended
September 24,
2016

Three months
ended
December 31,
2016 (4)

(In thousands, except per share data)

$ 6,119
$ 1,342
$ (6,317)
$ (6,932)

$ 4,355
$ (550)
$ (993)
$ (3,194)

$ 5,795
$
949
$ (6,883)
$ (8,117)

$ 6,373
$ 1,560
$ (6,280)
$ (5,190)

Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ (0.11)
$ (0.11)

$ (0.05)
$ (0.05)

$ (0.13)
$ (0.13)

$ (0.08)
$ (0.08)

Shares used in computing net loss per share from

continuing operations:

Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

63,978
63,978

64,011
64,011

64,048
64,048

64,138
64,138

72

KOPIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

(1) Net loss per share is computed independently for each of the quarters presented; accordingly, the sum of the

quarterly net income per share may not equal the total computed for the year.

(2) Gross profit is defined as net product revenue less cost of product revenues.
(3)

Includes $7.7 million impact on net gain attributable to the controlling interest relating to the gain on sale of
a facility for the three month period ended June 25, 2016.
Includes $1.0 million impact on net gain attributable to the controlling interest relating to the gain on sale
of an investment for the three month period ended December 31, 2016.

(4)

Quarterly Periods During Fiscal Year Ended December 26, 2015:

Three months
ended
March 28,
2015 (3)

Three months
ended
June 27,
2015 (4)

Three months
ended
September 26,
2015

Three months
ended
December 26,
2015

(In thousands, except per share data)

Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross profit (2) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Loss) income from operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net loss attributable to the controlling interest . . . . . . .
Net loss per share from continuing operations (1):

$ 8,585
$ 1,857
$ (5,933)
$ (3,885)

$10,857
$ 3,148
$ (5,474)
683
$

Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ (0.06)
$ (0.06)

$
$

0.01
0.01

$ 8,001
$ 1,762
$ (5,923)
$ (4,720)

$ (0.07)
$ (0.07)

$ 4,612
$ (118)
$ (7,906)
$ (6,771)

$ (0.11)
$ (0.11)

Shares used in computing net loss per share from

continuing operations:

Basic . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

63,084
63,084

63,066
65,030

63,068
63,068

63,608
63,608

(1) Net loss per share is computed independently for each of the quarters presented; accordingly, the sum of the

quarterly net income per share may not equal the total computed for the year.
(2) Gross profit is defined as net component revenue less cost of component revenues.
(3)

Includes $2.1 million impact on net gain attributable to the controlling interest relating to the gain on sale of
an investment for the three month period ended March 28, 2015.
Includes $5.5 million impact on net gain attributable to the controlling interest relating to the gain on sale of
an investment for the three month period ended June 27, 2015.

(4)

73

KOPIN CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)

Immaterial Restatement:

As a result of the embezzlement described in Note 14, we have made the following correcting adjustments

to the amounts presented in our previously issued quarterly financial information:

Increase (Decrease)

Three months
ended
March 26,
2016

Three months
ended
June 25,
2016

Three months
ended
March 28,
2015

Three months
ended
June 27,
2015

Three months
ended
September 26,
2015

Three months
ended
December 26,
2015

Gross Profit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss from operations . . . . . . . . . .
Net (loss) gain attributable to the
. . . . . . . . .

controlling interest

$ 11
11

$ 36
36

(In thousands)

$ 12
12

$ 21
21

$—
—

(15)

(65)

(47)

(98)

(45)

$ 52
52

189

The correcting adjustments did not result in any changes to previously reported basic and diluted earnings

per share.

74

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant

has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

March 22, 2017

KOPIN CORPORATION

By:

/S/

JOHN C.C. FAN
John C.C. Fan
Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer,
President and Director

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by

the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signature

Title

Date

/S/

JOHN C.C. FAN
John C.C. Fan

/S/

JAMES BREWINGTON
James Brewington

/S/ DAVID E. BROOK

David E. Brook

/S/ MORTON COLLINS

Morton Collins

Chairman of the Board, Chief

March 22, 2017

Executive Officer, President and
Director (Principal Executive
Officer)

Director

Director

Director

March 22, 2017

March 22, 2017

March 22, 2017

/S/ ANDREW H. CHAPMAN

Director

March 22, 2017

Andrew H. Chapman

/S/ CHI CHIA HSIEH

Chi Chia Hsieh

Director

March 22, 2017

/S/ MICHAEL J. LANDINE

Director

March 22, 2017

Michael J. Landine

/S/ RICHARD A. SNEIDER

Treasurer and Chief Financial

March 22, 2017

Richard A. Sneider

Officer (Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer)

75

KOPIN CORPORATION

SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS

Fiscal Years Ended December 31, 2016, December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014

Description

Reserve deducted from assets—allowance for doubtful accounts:

Balance at
Beginning
of Year

Additions
Charged
to
Income

Deductions
from
Reserve

Balance at
End of
Year

2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$202,000
266,000
153,000

$81,000

—
—

$ (17,000) $266,000
153,000
(113,000)
136,000
(17,000)

76

Sequential
page number
(2)
(5)
(5)
(8)
(1)

(1)
(7)*
(9)*
(10)*
(11)*
(13)*
(6)*
(1)*

(1)

(3)

(4)

*

(12)*

(12)*
*
(14)

(15)

Exhibits
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
4
10.1

10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
10.7
10.8
10.9

10.10

10.11

10.12

10.13

10.14

10.15
10.16
10.17

21.1
23.1
31.1

31.2

32.1

32.2

101.0

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation
Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation
Fifth Amended and Restated By-laws
Specimen Certificate of Common Stock
Form of Employee Agreement with Respect to Inventions and Proprietary
Information
Kopin Corporation 2001 Equity Incentive Plan
Kopin Corporation 2001 Equity Incentive Plan Amendment
Kopin Corporation 2001 Equity Incentive Plan Amendment
Kopin Corporation 2001 Equity Incentive Plan Amendment
Kopin Corporation 2001 Equity Incentive Plan Amendment
Kopin Corporation 2001 Supplemental Equity Incentive Plan
Form of Key Employee Stock Purchase Agreement
License Agreement by and between the Company and Massachusetts Institute of
Technology dated April 22, 1985, as amended
Facility Lease, by and between the Company and Massachusetts Technology Park
Corporation, dated October 15, 1993
Joint Venture Agreement, by and among the Company, Kowon Technology Co.,
Ltd., and Korean Investors, dated as of March 3, 1998
Eighth Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and
Dr. John C.C. Fan, dated as of December 31, 2014
Kopin Corporation Form of Stock Option Agreement under 2001 and 2010 Equity
Incentive Plans
Kopin Corporation 2001 and 2010 Equity Incentive Plan Form of Restricted Stock
Purchase Agreement
Kopin Corporation Fiscal Year 2012 Incentive Bonus Plan
Kopin Corporation 2010 Equity Incentive Plan
Purchase Agreement, dated January 10, 2013, by and among Kopin Corporation,
IQE KC, LLC and IQE plc
Subsidiaries of Kopin Corporation
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Chief Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Chief Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
The following materials from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business
Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Consolidated Statements
of Operations, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss, (iv)
Consolidated Statements of Stockholder’s Equity, (v) Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows, and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks
of text

77

* Management contract or compensatory plan required to be filed as an Exhibit to this Annual Report on Form

10-K.

** This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in any
filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or
after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any filing.

(1) Filed as an exhibit to Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 33-45853, and incorporated herein by

reference.

(2) Filed as an exhibit to Registration Statement on Form S-1, File No. 33-57450, and incorporated herein by

reference.

(3) Filed as an exhibit to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993 and

incorporated herein by reference.

(4) Filed as an exhibit to Annual Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 27, 1998 and

incorporated herein by reference.

(5) Filed as an exhibit to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 1, 2000 and

incorporated herein by reference.

(6) Filed as an exhibit to Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended July 1, 2000 and

incorporated herein by reference.

(7) Filed as an appendix to Proxy Statement filed on April 20, 2001 and incorporated herein by reference.
(8) Filed as an exhibit to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 18, 2016 and incorporated herein by

reference.

(9) Filed as an exhibit to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 12, 2008 and incorporated herein by

reference.

(10) Filed as an exhibit to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on March 15, 2004 and incorporated herein

by reference.

(11) Filed as an exhibit to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on May 10, 2004 and incorporated herein by

reference.

(12) Filed as an exhibit to Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2004 and

incorporated herein by reference.

(13) Filed as an exhibit to Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on April 15, 2008 and incorporated herein by

reference.

(14) Filed with the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14 filed as of April 5, 2013 and

incorporated by reference herein.

(15) Filed as an exhibit to Current Report on Form 8-K on January 10, 2013 and incorporated by reference

herein.

78

Shareholder Information

Corporate Headquarters
Kopin Corporation
125 North Drive
Westborough, Massachusetts 01581
Phone: (508) 870-5959
Fax: (508) 870-0660

Display Manufacturing
Westborough, Massachusetts
Dalgety Bay, Fife, Scotland

Display Design Center
Scotts Valley, California

Software Development
Nottingham, England

Wearable Tech Center
San Jose, California

Common Stock
Kopin Corporation common stock is traded on the Nasdaq
Stock Market under the symbol KOPN

Corporate and Investor Information
Financial analysts, stockholders, interested investors and the
financial media requesting a copy of the Company’s 10-K filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or other
information, should contact Richard Sneider, CFO, at (508)
870-5959.

Transfer Agent & Registrar
Correspondence concerning transfer requirements and lost
certificates should be addressed to the transfer agent:

Computershare Investor Services
P.O. Box 30170
College Station, TX 77842
(800) 962-4284

Annual Meeting
The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company will be
held at 9:00 a.m. (ET) Wednesday, May 31, 2017 at Morgan,
Lewis & Bockius LLP, One Federal Street, Boston,
Massachusetts.

Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Boston, Massachusetts

Legal Counsel
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius
Boston, Massachusetts

Chu, Ring & Hazel, LLP
Boston, Massachusetts

Patent Counsel
Hamilton, Brook, Smith & Reynolds
Concord, Massachusetts

“Kopin,” the KOPIN logo, “CyberDis-
play,” “CyberEVF,” “BDM,” “Pupil,”
“Ruby,” “Powered by Kopin,” “The
Nano-Semiconducter Company,”
“Forth Dimension Displays Ltd.”
“Kopin Software Ltd.,” “eMDT
America Inc.,” Voice Extraction,
Whisper, Replications Reality,
”Solos,” “SiMax,” and “Golden-i” are
trademarks and service marks of
Kopin Corporation. Other product,
company or organization names
cited in this annual report may be
trademarks or registered trademarks
of their respective companies or
organizations.

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

CORPORATE 
OFFICERS

JOHN C.C. FAN
President, Chief Executive Officer 
and Chairman of the Board

RICHARD A. SNEIDER
Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

BOR YEU TSAUR
Executive Vice President, 
Display Operations

HONG K. CHOI
Chief Technology Officer

BOARD OF 
DIRECTORS

JAMES K. BREWINGTON(3)

MORTON COLLINS(1)(2)

J.K. Brewington Business  
Development

Managing Partner,  
M Collins Ventures

DAVID E. BROOK

JOHN C.C. FAN

Founder and Senior Partner, 
Hamilton, Brook, Smith & Reynolds

President, Chief Executive Officer 
and Chairman of the Board, 
Kopin Corporation

CHI CHIA HSIEH(3)

MICHAEL J. LANDINE(1)(3)

Vice Chairman, 
Microelectronics Technology, Inc.

Vice President of Corporate 
Development, Alkermes, Inc.

ANDREW H. CHAPMAN(1)(2)

Private Investor

(1)  Member of Audit Committee

(2)  Member of Compensation Committee

(3)  Member of Nominating and Corporate  

Governance Committee

Annual Report Design by Curran & Connors, Inc. / www.curran-connors.com

125 North Drive
Westborough, MA 01581 
www.kopin.com