Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
☒☒
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
For the fiscal year ended May 27, 2018
OR
☐☐
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
F or the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 1-37830
LAMB WESTON HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
599 S. Rivershore Lane
Eagle, Idaho
(Address of principal executive offices)
61-1797411
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
83616
(Zip Code)
(208) 938-1047
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Common Stock, $1.00 par value
Name of each exchange on which registered
New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90
days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and
posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to
the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10‑K. ☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth
company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
☒
☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company
☐
☐
☐
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial
accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒
The aggregate market value of the voting common stock of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. held by non-affiliates on November 26, 2017 (the last business day of the Registrant's
most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was approximately $7.96 billion based upon the closing sale price on the New York Stock Exchange on such date. As of July 16,
2018, the Registrant had 146,332,332 shares of common stock, par value $1.00 per share, outstanding.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
Portions of the Registrant's definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with its 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are
incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Business
Part I
Item 1
Item 1A Risk Factors
Item 1B Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2
Item 3
Item 4
Properties
Legal Proceedings
Mine Safety Disclosures
Part II
Item 5
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities
Selected Financial Data
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation s
Item 6
Item 7
Item 7A Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 8
Item 9
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9A Controls and Procedures
Item 9B Other Information
Part III
Item 10
Item 11
Item 12
Item 13
Item 14
Part IV
Item 15
Signatures
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Executive Compensation
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
3
10
22
23
24
24
24
26
26
43
44
87
87
89
89
89
90
90
90
91
95
All reports we file with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) are available free of charge via the Electronic
Data Gathering Analysis and Retrieval (“EDGAR”) System on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. We also provide copies of our
SEC filings at no charge upon request and make electronic copies of our reports available through our website at
www.lambweston.com
as soon as reasonably practicable after filing such material with the SEC.
2
Table of Contents
Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities
laws. Words such as “will,” “may,” “expect,” “would,” “could,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate,” “deliver,” “grow,”
“invest,” “support,” “drive,” “outlook,” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-
looking statements. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding our plans,
execution, capital investments, dividends, taxes, and business outlook and prospects. These forward-looking statements are based
on management’s current expectations and are subject to uncertainties and changes in circumstances. Readers of this report
should understand that these statements are not guarantees of performance or results. Many factors could affect our actual
financial results and cause them to vary materially from the expectations contained in the forward-looking statements, including
those set forth in this report. These risks and uncertainties include, among other things: our ability to successfully execute our
long-term value creation strategies; our ability to execute on large capital projects, including construction of new production lines;
the competitive environment and related conditions in the markets in which we operate; political and economic conditions of the
countries in which we conduct business and other factors related to our international operations; disruption of our access to export
mechanisms; risks associated with possible acquisitions, including our ability to complete acquisitions or integrate acquired
businesses; our debt levels; the availability and prices of raw materials; changes in our relationships with our growers or
significant customers; the success of our joint ventures; actions of governments and regulatory factors affecting our businesses or
joint ventures; the ultimate outcome of litigation or any product recalls; levels of pension, labor and people-related expenses; our
ability to pay regular quarterly cash dividends and the amounts and timing of any future dividends; and other risks described in
our reports filed from time to time with the SEC, including those described under the heading “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this
report. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements included in this report, which speak
only as of the date of this report. We undertake no responsibility for updating these statements, except as required by law.
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
PART I
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” “the Company,” or “Lamb Weston”), along with its joint venture
partners, is a leading global producer, distributor, and marketer of value-added frozen potato products and is headquartered in
Eagle, Idaho. We, along with our joint venture partners, are the number one supplier of value-added frozen potato products in
North America. We are also a leading supplier of value-added frozen potato products internationally, with a strong and growing
presence in high-growth emerging markets. We, along with our joint venture partners, offer a broad product portfolio to a diverse
channel and customer base in over 100 countries. French fries represent the majority of our value-added frozen potato product
portfolio.
We were organized as a Delaware corporation in July 2016, as a wholly owned subsidiary of Conagra Brands, Inc.
(formerly, ConAgra Foods, Inc., “Conagra”). On November 9, 2016, we separated from Conagra and became an independent
publicly traded company through the pro rata distribution by Conagra of 100% of our outstanding common stock to Conagra
stockholders (“Separation” or “spinoff”). Each Conagra stockholder of record on November 1, 2016 (“record date”) received one
share of our common stock for every three shares of Conagra common stock held on the record date. As a result of the Separation,
approximately 146 million shares of our common stock were distributed on November 9, 2016, to Conagra stockholders. On
November 10, 2016, our common stock began trading under the ticker symbol “LW” on the New York Stock Exchange
(“NYSE”).
In connection with the Separation, we entered into a separation and distribution agreement and several other agreements
with Conagra, including a transition services agreement, tax matters agreement, employee matters agreement, and trademark
license agreement. These agreements govern the relationship between us and Conagra following the Separation and provide for
the allocation of various assets, liabilities, rights and obligations of the parties. These agreements also include arrangements for
transition services to be provided by Conagra to Lamb Weston. For a discussion of these agreements, see the section entitled
“Relationship with ConAgra After the Spinoff” in our registration statement on Form 10, as amended, as filed with the SEC on
October 17, 2016 (“Form 10”), and Note 3, Related Party Transactions,
3
Table of Contents
of the Notes to Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data” in this Form 10-K. In April 2018, we concluded our transition services agreement with Conagra.
In connection with the Separation, Conagra transferred substantially all of the assets and liabilities and operations of the
Lamb Weston business to us. Combined financial statements for Lamb Weston for periods prior to the Separation were prepared
on a stand-alone basis and were derived from Conagra’s consolidated financial statements and accounting records. The combined
financial statements for Lamb Weston contained in this report for periods prior to the Separation reflect our financial position,
results of operations, comprehensive income, and cash flows as our business was operated as part of Conagra prior to the
Separation and include allocations for a portion of Conagra’s shared corporate general and administrative expenses. Following the
Separation, our consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc., its wholly owned
subsidiaries, and Lamb Weston BSW, LLC, which we own a 49.99% interest in, but we consolidate because we are the primary
beneficiary. The combined financial position, results of operations, and cash flows as of dates and for periods prior to the
Separation may not be indicative of what our financial position, results of operations and cash flows would have been as a
separate stand-alone public company during the periods presented, nor are they indicative of what our financial position, results of
operations and cash flows may be in the future. Information related to the Separation and its effect on our financial statements are
discussed throughout this Form 10‑K.
Segments
We have four reportable segments: Global, Foodservice, Retail, and Other. For segment financial information see
Note 13, Segments, of the Notes to Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data” of this Form 10‑K.
Global
Our Global segment includes branded and private label frozen potato products sold in North America and international
markets. This segment includes the top 100 North American based restaurant chains and international customers comprised of
global and regional restaurant chains, foodservice distributors, and retailers. We have included non-U.S. and non-Canadian retail
and foodservice customers in the Global segment due to efficiencies associated with coordinating sales to all customer types
within specific markets, as well as due to these customers’ smaller scale and dependence on local economic conditions. The
Global segment’s product portfolio includes frozen potatoes, sweet potatoes, and appetizers sold under the Lamb
Weston
® brand,
as well as many customer labels.
Foodservice
Our Foodservice segment includes branded and private label frozen potato products sold throughout the United States
and Canada. The Foodservice segment’s primary products are frozen potatoes, sweet potatoes, commercial ingredients, and
appetizers sold under the Lamb
Weston
® brand, as well as many customer labels. Our products are sold primarily to commercial
distributors, restaurant chains outside the top 100 North American based restaurant chains, and non-commercial channels.
Retail
Our Retail segment includes consumer facing retail branded and private label frozen potato products sold primarily to
grocery, mass merchants, club, and specialty retailers. The Retail segment’s primary products are frozen potatoes and sweet
potato items sold under our owned or licensed brands, including Grown
in
Idaho
® and Alexia
®, other licensed equities
comprised of brand names of major North American restaurant chains, and the retailers’ own brands.
Other
The Other reporting segment primarily includes our vegetable and dairy businesses.
4
Table of Contents
Joint Venture Relationships
We conduct business through two unconsolidated joint ventures and include our share of the earnings of these affiliates
as equity method investment earnings in our combined and consolidated financial statements based on our economic ownership
interest in each of these joint ventures. These two joint ventures produce and market value-added frozen potato products for our
customers:
· We hold a fifty percent ownership interest in Lamb-Weston/Meijer v.o.f. (“Lamb-Weston/Meijer”), a joint venture
with Meijer Frozen Foods B.V. that is, headquartered in the Netherlands, and manufactures and sells frozen potato
products principally in Europe.
· We hold a fifty percent ownership interest in Lamb-Weston/RDO Frozen (“Lamb-Weston/RDO”), a potato
processing venture with RDO Frozen Co. We provide all sales and marketing services to Lamb-Weston/RDO and
receive a fee for these services based on a percentage of the net sales of the venture.
In addition, we hold a 49.99% interest in Lamb Weston BSW, LLC (“Lamb Weston BSW”), a potato processing venture
with Ochoa Ag Unlimited Foods, Inc. (“Ochoa”). We provide all sales and marketing services to Lamb Weston BSW. Lamb
Weston BSW is a variable interest entity, and we have determined that we are the primary beneficiary of the entity. We
consolidate the financial statements of Lamb Weston BSW. In June 2018, we provided notice to Ochoa of our exercise of a call
option to purchase Ochoa’s interest in Lamb Weston BSW. We expect to pay approximately $65 million and will consummate the
transaction as soon as practicable. For more information, see Note 6, Investments in Joint Ventures, of the Notes to Combined and
Consolidated Financial Statements in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K.
Sales, Distribution and Customers
We benefit from strong relationships with a diverse set of customers. We sell our products through a combined network
of internal sales personnel and independent brokers, agents, and distributors to chain restaurants, wholesale, grocery, mass
merchants, club, specialty retailers, and foodservice distributors and institutions, including businesses, educational institutions,
independent restaurants, regional chain restaurants, and convenience stores. We have long-tenured relationships with leading
quick service and fast casual restaurants, global foodservice distributors, large grocery retailers, and mass merchants.
Our largest customer, McDonald’s Corporation, accounted for approximately 11% of our consolidated “net sales” in
each of fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016. No other customer accounted for more than 10% of our fiscal 2018, 2017, or 2016
consolidated net sales. Accounts receivable from another customer accounted for 12% of our consolidated accounts receivable at
May 27, 2018. Accounts receivable from an additional customer accounted for 10% of our consolidated accounts receivable at
May 28, 2017.
International Operations
At May 27, 2018, we had operations in twelve countries, with manufacturing and processing facilities in three countries.
Foreign net sales, including sales by domestic segments to customers located outside of the United States and Canada, were
approximately $665.8 million, $663.5 million, and $615.9 million in fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Our long-lived
assets located outside of the United States are not significant. See Note 13, Segments, of the Notes to Combined and Consolidated
Financial Statements in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K for additional
information on our U.S. and non-U.S. operations. Also see “Item 2. Properties,” for more information on our manufacturing and
other facilities. For a discussion of risks related to our operations outside the United States, see “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of this
Form 10-K.
5
Table of Contents
Research and Development
We leverage our research and development resources for both growth and efficiency initiatives. We seek to drive growth
through innovation by creating new products, enhancing the quality of existing products, and participating in joint menu planning
exercises with our customers. We also emphasize sustainability in our research and development activities and continue to drive
processing innovations aimed at reducing waste and water usage. Research and development expense was $13.5 million, $10.6
million, and $6.7 million in fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.
Raw Materials and Packaging
Our primary raw materials are potatoes, edible oils, energy, and packaging. We source a significant amount of our raw
potatoes under both strategic, long-term grower relationships and shorter-term annual contracts. In the United States, most of the
potato crop used in value-added products is grown in Idaho, Oregon, and Washington. For Lamb-Weston/Meijer, European
growing regions for the necessary potatoes are concentrated in the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, France, the United Kingdom,
and China. We believe that the grower networks to which we have access provide a sufficient source of raw potato inputs year-to-
year. We source edible oils through strategic relationships with key suppliers, and we source energy and packaging materials
through multiple suppliers under a variety of agreement types.
The prices paid for these raw materials, as well as other raw materials used in making our products, generally reflect
factors such as weather, commodity market fluctuations, currency fluctuations, tariffs, and the effects of governmental
agricultural programs. Although the prices of raw materials can be expected to fluctuate as a result of these factors, we believe
such raw materials to be in adequate supply.
From time to time, we have faced increased costs for our significant raw materials, packaging and energy inputs. We
seek to mitigate higher input costs through long-term relationships, contract strategies, and hedging activities where an active
market for an input exists, as well as through our productivity and pricing initiatives.
Manufacturing
We own and operate 15 manufacturing facilities for our products. See "Item 2. Properties" for more information about
our manufacturing facilities.
In addition to our own manufacturing facilities, we source a portion of our products under “co-packing” agreements, a
common industry practice in which manufacturing is outsourced to other companies. We regularly evaluate our co-packing
arrangements to ensure the most cost-effective manufacturing of our products and to utilize company-owned manufacturing
facilities most effectively.
Backlog
We manufacture primarily to fill customer orders from finished goods inventories. While at any given time there may be
some backlog of orders due to the seasonal nature of our manufacturing activities and associated inventory, such backlog is not
material in respect to annual net sales, and the changes of backlog orders from time to time are not significant.
Competition
The value-added frozen potato products industry in both North America and international markets is highly
competitive. Competitors include large national and international frozen potato product companies, as well as local and regional
companies. Significant competitors include McCain Foods, J.R. Simplot Company, Cavendish Farms, and The Kraft Heinz
Company. Some of our competitors are larger and have substantially more financial, sales and marketing, and other resources. We
compete with producers of similar products on the basis of, among other things, customer service,
6
Table of Contents
value, product innovation, product quality, food safety, brand recognition and loyalty, price, and the ability to identify and satisfy
customer preferences. The markets in which we operate are expected to remain highly competitive for the foreseeable future. See
also “Item 1A. Risk Factors – Increased competition may result in reduced sales or profits” of this Form 10-K.
Trademarks, Licenses and Patents
Our trademarks are material to our business and are protected by registration or other means in the United States and
most other geographic markets where the related food items are sold. Depending on the country, trademarks generally remain
valid for as long as they are in use and their registration status is maintained. Trademark registrations generally are for renewable,
fixed terms. Our significant trademarks include: Lamb
Weston,
Lamb’s
Supreme,
Lamb
Weston
Seeing
Possibilities
in
Potatoes
(and design), Lamb’s
Seasoned,
LW
Private
Reserve,
Stealth
Fries,
and Sweet
Things.
We also sell certain products under brands,
such as Grown
in
Idaho
and Alexia
, which we license from third parties.
We own numerous patents worldwide. We consider our portfolio of patents, patent applications, patent licenses under
patents owned by third parties, proprietary trade secrets, technology, know-how processes, and related intellectual property rights
to be material to our operations. Patents, issued or applied for, cover inventions, including packaging, manufacturing processes,
equipment, formulations, and designs. Our issued patents extend for varying periods according to the date of the patent
application filing or grant and the legal term of patents in the various countries where patent protection is obtained. The actual
protection afforded by a patent, which can vary from country to country, depends upon the type of patent, the scope of its
coverage as determined by the patent office or courts in the country, and the availability of legal remedies in the country. While
we consider our patent portfolio to be material to our business, the loss of one patent or a group of related patents would not have
a material adverse effect on our business.
Seasonality
Our product contribution margin percentage, inventory levels, net sales and cash flows are affected by seasonality. In
general, our product contribution margin percentage tends to be highest in our fiscal third quarter, reflecting the benefit of freshly-
harvested potatoes. We typically harvest potatoes in the Pacific Northwest of the United States in July through October, which is
primarily in our fiscal second quarter. Freshly-harvested potatoes process more efficiently in our production lines and are not
subject to storage or secondary transport costs. We typically hold about 60 days of finished goods inventory on a first-in-first-out
basis, so the relatively favorable costs primarily incurred from our fiscal second quarter harvest flow through our income
statement in our fiscal third quarter. Inventory levels also tend to be higher in our fiscal third quarter, requiring more working
capital at that time. In general, net sales and cash flows tend to be higher in our fiscal fourth quarter, reflecting customer and
consumer buying patterns.
Employees
As of June 30, 2018, we had approximately 7,200 employees, excluding our joint ventures. Approximately 700 of these
employees work outside of the United States. Approximately 26% of our hourly employees are parties to collective bargaining
agreements on terms that we believe are typical for the industry in which we operate. Most of the union workers at our facilities
are represented under contracts that expire at various times throughout the next several years. Approximately 44% expire in fiscal
2019. As these agreements expire, we believe they will be renegotiated on terms satisfactory to us.
7
Table of Contents
Executive Officers
The following are our executive officers as of July 16, 2018:
Name
Thomas P. Werner
Robert M. McNutt
Micheline C. Carter
Richard A. Martin
Sharon L. Miller
Michael J. Smith
Eryk J. Spytek
Title
Director, President and Chief Executive Officer
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer
Senior Vice President and Chief Supply Chain Officer
Senior Vice President and General Manager, Global Business Unit
Senior Vice President and General Manager, Foodservice and Retail Business
Units and Marketing and Innovation
Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary
Age
52
58
52
61
52
41
50
Thomas
P.
Werner
has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer and a member of our Board of Directors
since November 2016. He previously served as President, Commercial Foods, for Conagra, a food company, since May 2015. In
that role, he led the company’s Lamb Weston and Foodservice businesses, as well as its previously divested Spicetec Flavors &
Seasonings and J.M. Swank operations. Mr. Werner also served as interim President of Conagra’s Private Brands from June 2015
through its divestiture in February 2016. Before his appointment as President, Commercial Foods, Mr. Werner served as Senior
Vice President of Finance for Conagra’s Private Brands and Commercial Foods operating segments from June 2013 to April
2015, and Senior Vice President of Finance for Lamb Weston from May 2011 until June 2013.
Robert
M.
McNutt
has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since January 2017. Prior to
joining Lamb Weston, Mr. McNutt served as Chief Financial Officer of Expera Specialty Solutions, LLC, a specialty paper
company, from September 2013 to December 2016. Mr. McNutt served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for
Greif, Inc., an industrial packaging company, from January 2011 to July 2013, and as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer for Boise Inc., a packaging and paper products manufacturer, from February 2008 to January 2011.
Micheline
C.
Carter
has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer since November 2016.
Ms. Carter joined Lamb Weston in September 2016. From July 2012 until September 2016, she served in a variety of roles with
The Kraft Heinz Company, a food and beverage company, including as Head of U.S. People and Performance and Global
Corporate Functions from November 2015 to September 2016, Vice President of Human Resources, Global Corporate Functions
from August 2015 until October 2015, Vice President of Human Resources, Cheese & Dairy from January 2015 until July 2015,
and Senior Director Human Resources & Global Exports from July 2012 until January 2015. Before joining The Kraft Heinz
Company, Ms. Carter served from February 2011 until July 2012 as Senior Director Human Resources, Solar Energy & Solar
Materials with MEMC Electronic Materials, Inc. (now known as SunEdison, Inc.), a supplier of silicon wafers to semiconductor
and photovoltaic cell companies. Before that, Ms. Carter served in a variety of roles with J. C. Penney Company, Inc., an apparel
and home furnishings retailer, Yum! Brands, Inc., an operator of fast food companies, and Texas Instruments Incorporated, a
semiconductor design and manufacturing company.
Richard
A.
Martin
has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Supply Chain Officer since September 2016. Mr.
Martin joined Conagra as a Manufacturing Manager in 1994, and from 1997 to 2003, he served as Plant Manager of several of our
facilities. Mr. Martin also served as Director of Operations from 2003 to 2005, Vice President, Manufacturing from 2005 to 2011,
and Vice President, Global Operations from 2011 until 2016. Before joining Lamb Weston, Mr. Martin spent 15 years at General
Foods Corporation and Kraft Foods Inc., food and beverage companies, in a variety of engineering and manufacturing positions.
8
Table of Contents
Sharon
L.
Miller
has served as our Senior Vice President and General Manager, Global Business Unit since September
2016. Before that, she served as Conagra’s Vice President and General Manager, Lamb Weston Global Business Unit since 2015.
Since joining Conagra in 1999, Ms. Miller has held various leadership positions, including Vice President of Sales for Lamb
Weston's European joint venture, Lamb-Weston/Meijer v.o.f. Prior to that, Ms. Miller was a key sales and business leader within
Lamb Weston in both the United States and Canada. She also has held various sales positions with North American food
manufacturers and foodservice distributors.
Michael
J.
Smith
has served as our Senior Vice President and General Manager, Foodservice and Retail Business Units
and Marketing and Innovation since April 2018. Prior to that, he served as Senior Vice President, Growth and Strategy beginning
in September 2016. Mr. Smith also served as Vice President and General Manager of Lamb Weston Retail from May 2011 to
September 2016, Vice President and General Manager of Conagra’s Private Brands from March 2014 to February 2016, and Vice
President of Global Marketing of Lamb Weston from July 2012 to March 2014. Prior to joining Conagra in 2007, Mr. Smith held
various brand management roles at Dean Foods Company, a food and beverage company, and its WhiteWave division from May
2003 until December 2007.
Eryk
J.
Spytek
has served as our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary since October 2016.
From June 2015 until October 2016, Mr. Spytek was Of Counsel at Winston & Strawn LLP, a law firm. Before returning to
Winston & Strawn LLP, he served from December 2009 until April 2015 in a variety of roles with Mead Johnson Nutrition
Company, a manufacturer of infant formula, including as Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and Assistant Secretary from
April 2013 to April 2015 and as Vice President, Associate General Counsel and Assistant Secretary from December 2009 to April
2013. Before that, Mr. Spytek served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary at SIRVA, Inc., a moving and
relocation services provider, from February 2006 to February 2009. Before joining SIRVA, Inc., Mr. Spytek was a partner at
Winston & Strawn LLP.
Ethics and Governance
We have adopted a code of conduct that applies to all of our employees, as well as a code of ethics for senior corporate
financial officers that applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and Controller. These codes are available
on our website at www.lambweston.com through the “Investors—Corporate Governance” link. We will disclose any waiver we
grant to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, or Controller under our codes, or certain amendments to the codes,
on our website at www.lambweston.com.
In addition, we adopted Corporate Governance Principles and charters for the Audit and Finance Committee,
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and Compensation Committee. All of these materials are available on our
website at www.lambweston.com and will be provided free of charge to any stockholder requesting a copy by writing to:
Corporate Secretary, Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc., 599 S. Rivershore Lane, Eagle, Idaho 83616.
The information on our website is not, and shall not be deemed to be, a part of this Form 10-K or incorporated into any
other filings we make with the SEC.
Food Safety and Labeling
We are subject to extensive regulation, including, among other things, the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, as amended by
the Food Safety Modernization Act, the Public Health Security and Bioterrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002, and the
rules and regulations promulgated thereunder by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”). This comprehensive and
evolving regulatory program governs, among other things, the manufacturing, composition and ingredients, labeling, packaging,
and safety of food, including compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practices. In addition, the Nutrition Label Reform Act
of 2016 prescribes the format and content in which specific nutrition information is required to appear on the labels of food
products. We are also subject to regulation by certain other governmental agencies, including the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
9
Table of Contents
Our operations and products are also subject to state and local regulation, including the registration and licensing of
plants, enforcement by state health agencies of various state standards, and the registration and inspection of facilities.
Compliance with federal, state, and local regulation is costly and time-consuming. Enforcement actions for violations of federal,
state, and local regulations may include seizure and condemnation of products, cease and desist orders, injunctions, or monetary
penalties. We believe that our practices are sufficient to maintain compliance with applicable government regulations.
Environmental, Health and Safety Regulations
We are subject to a number of federal, state, and local laws and other regulations relating to the protection of the
environment and the safety and health of personnel and the public. These requirements apply to a broad range of our activities,
including: the discharge of pollutants into the air and water; the identification, generation, storage, handling, transportation,
disposal, recordkeeping, labeling, and reporting of, and emergency response in connection with, hazardous materials; noise
emissions from our facilities; and safety and health standards, practices, and procedures that apply to the workplace and the
operation of our facilities.
In order to comply with these requirements, we may need to spend substantial amounts of money and other resources
from time to time to (i) construct or acquire new equipment, (ii) acquire or amend permits to authorize facility operations, (iii)
modify, upgrade, or replace existing and proposed equipment, and (iv) clean up or decommission our facilities or other locations
in accordance with regulatory requirements. Our capital and operating budgets include costs and expenses associated with
complying with these laws and other requirements.
Available Information
We make available, free of charge on our website at www.lambweston.com, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly
reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file them with, or
furnish them to, the SEC. We use our website, through the “Investors” link, as a channel for routine distribution of important
information, including news releases, analyst presentations, and financial information. The information on our website is not, and
shall not be deemed to be, a part of this Form 10-K or incorporated into any other filings we make with the SEC unless expressly
noted.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Our business is subject to various risks and uncertainties. Any of the risks and uncertainties described below could
materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations and should be considered in evaluating
us. While we believe we have identified and discussed below the material risks affecting our business, there may be additional
risks and uncertainties that we do not presently know or that we do not currently believe to be material that may adversely affect
our business, financial condition, or results of operations in the future.
Increased competition may result in reduced sales or profits.
Our business, value-added frozen potato products, is highly competitive. Our principal competitors have substantial
financial, sales and marketing, and other resources. A strong competitive response from one or more of our competitors to our
marketplace efforts could result in us reducing pricing, increasing promotional activity or losing market share. Competitive
pressures also may restrict our ability to increase prices, including in response to commodity and other input cost increases or
additional improvements in product quality. Our profits could decrease if a reduction in prices or increased costs are not
counterbalanced with increased sales volume.
10
Table of Contents
Increased industry capacity may result in reduced sales or profits.
In recent years, market demand for value-added frozen potato products has exceeded industry capacity to produce these
products. As additional industry capacity comes online, or market demand otherwise decreases, we may face competitive
pressures that would restrict our ability to increase or maintain prices. Our profits would decrease as a result of a reduction in
prices or sales volume.
Our business, financial condition, and results of operations could be adversely affected by the political and economic
conditions of the countries in which we conduct business and other factors related to our international operations, including
foreign currency risks and trade barriers.
We conduct a substantial and growing amount of business with customers located outside the United States and Canada,
including through our joint ventures. During each of fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, net sales outside the United States and Canada,
primarily in Japan, China, Korea, Mexico, and Taiwan, accounted for approximately 20% of our net sales. These amounts do not
include any impact of unconsolidated net sales associated with our joint ventures, which are also subject to risks associated with
international operations.
Many factors relating to our international sales and operations, many of which factors are outside of our control, could
have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results of operations, including:
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
foreign exchange rates, foreign currency exchange and transfer restrictions, which may unpredictably and adversely
impact our combined operating results, asset and liability balances, and cash flow in our combined and consolidated
financial statements, even if their value has not changed in their original currency;
our combined and consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars, and we must translate the assets,
liabilities, revenue and expenses into U.S. dollars for external reporting purposes;
changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies of the United States and foreign governments, including modification
or termination of existing trade agreements (e.g., the North American Free Trade Agreement (“NAFTA”)) or
treaties, creation of new trade agreements or treaties, trade regulations, and increased or new tariffs, quotas, import
or export licensing requirements, and other trade barriers imposed by governments. In particular, changes in U.S.
trade programs and trade relations with other countries, including the imposition of trade protection measures by
foreign countries in favor of their local producers of competing products, such as governmental subsidies, tax
benefits, and other measures giving local producers a competitive advantage over Lamb Weston, may adversely
affect our business and results of operations in those countries;
negative economic developments in economies around the world and the instability of governments, including the
threat of wars, terrorist attacks, epidemics or civil unrest;
pandemics, such as the flu, which may adversely affect our workforce as well as our local suppliers and customers;
earthquakes, tsunamis, floods or other major disasters that may limit the supply of raw materials that are purchased
abroad for use in our international operations or domestically;
increased costs, disruptions in shipping or reduced availability of freight transportation;
differing labor standards in the international markets in which we operate;
differing levels of protection of intellectual property across the international markets in which we operate;
11
Table of Contents
·
·
·
·
·
difficulties and costs associated with complying with U.S. laws and regulations applicable to entities with overseas
operations, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act;
the threat that our operations or property could be subject to nationalization and expropriation;
varying regulatory, tax, judicial and administrative practices in the international markets in which we operate;
difficulties associated with operating under a wide variety of complex foreign laws, treaties and regulations; and
potentially burdensome taxation.
Any of these factors could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Disruption of our access to export mechanisms could have an adverse impact on our business, financial condition, and results
of operations.
To serve our customers globally, we rely in part on our international joint venture partnerships, but also on exports from
the United States. During fiscal 2018, export sales accounted for 19% of our total net sales. Circumstances beyond our control,
such as a labor dispute at a port, could prevent us from exporting our products in sufficient quantities to meet customer
opportunities. We have access to production overseas through our facility in China and joint venture in Europe, but we may be
unsuccessful in mitigating any future disruption to export mechanisms. If this occurs, we may be unable to adequately supply all
of our customer opportunities, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our substantial debt may limit cash flow available to invest in the ongoing needs of our business and could prevent us from
fulfilling our debt obligations.
We incurred substantial indebtedness in connection with the Separation. As of May 27, 2018, we had $2,375.4 million of
long-term debt, including current portion, recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. We have the ability under our existing
revolving credit facility to incur additional substantial debt. Our level of debt could have important consequences. For example, it
could:
· make it more difficult for us to make payments on our debt;
·
·
·
·
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to the payment of debt service,
reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, and other
general corporate purposes;
increase our vulnerability to adverse economic or industry conditions;
limit our ability to obtain additional financing in the future to enable us to react to changes in our business; or
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to businesses in our industry that have less debt.
12
Table of Contents
The agreements governing our debt contain various covenants that impose restrictions on us that may affect our ability to
operate our business.
The credit agreement governing our term loan and revolving credit facility and the indentures governing our senior notes
contain covenants that, among other things, limit our ability to:
·
·
·
borrow money or guarantee debt;
create liens;
pay dividends on or redeem or repurchase stock;
· make specified types of investments and acquisitions;
·
·
·
enter into or permit to exist contractual limits on the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends to us;
enter into transactions with affiliates; and
sell assets or merge with other companies.
These restrictions on our ability to operate our business could harm our business by, among other things, limiting our
ability to take advantage of financing, merger and acquisition, and other corporate opportunities. Various risks, uncertainties, and
events beyond our control could affect our ability to comply with these covenants. Failure to comply with any of the covenants in
our existing or future financing agreements could result in a default under those agreements and under other agreements
containing cross-default provisions. A default would permit lenders to accelerate the maturity of the debt under these agreements
and to foreclose upon any collateral securing the debt. Under these circumstances, we might not have sufficient funds or other
resources to satisfy all of our obligations. In addition, the limitations imposed by financing agreements on our ability to incur
additional debt and to take other actions might significantly impair our ability to obtain other financing.
Additionally, any failure to meet required payments on our debt, or failure to comply with any covenants in the
instruments governing our debt, could result in a downgrade to our credit ratings. A downgrade in our credit ratings could limit
our access to capital and increase our borrowing costs.
Our business relies on a potato crop that has a concentrated growing region.
Ideal growing conditions for the potatoes necessary for our value-added products (e.g., french fries) are concentrated in a
few geographic regions globally. In the United States, most of the potato crop used in value-added products is grown in Idaho,
Oregon, and Washington. European growing regions for the necessary potatoes are concentrated in Belgium, France, Germany,
the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom. Recent agronomic developments have opened new growing regions, but the capital-
intensive nature of our industry’s production processes has kept production highly concentrated in the historical growing regions.
Unfavorable crop conditions in any one region could lead to significant demand on the other regions for production. Our inability
to mitigate any such conditions by leveraging our production capabilities in other regions could negatively impact our ability to
meet customer opportunities and could decrease our profitability.
Our business is affected by potato crop performance.
Our primary input is potatoes and every year, we must procure potatoes that meet the quality standards for processing
into value-added products. Environmental and climate conditions, such as soil quality, moisture, and
13
Table of Contents
temperature, affect the quality of the potato crop on a year-to-year basis. As a result, we source potatoes from specific regions of
the United States and specific countries abroad, including Belgium, France, Germany, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom,
Canada, and China, where we believe the optimal potato growing conditions exist. However, severe weather conditions during the
planting and growing season in these regions can significantly affect potato crop performance. Potatoes are also susceptible to
pest diseases and insects that can cause crop failure, decreased yields, and negatively affect the physical appearance of the
potatoes. We have deep experience in agronomy and actively work to monitor the potato crop. However, if a weather or pest-
related event occurs in a particular crop year, and our agronomic programs are insufficient to mitigate the impacts thereof, we
may have insufficient potatoes to meet our customer opportunities, and our competitiveness and profitability could decrease.
Alternatively, overly favorable growing conditions can lead to high per acre yields and over-supply. An increased supply of
potatoes could lead to overproduction of finished goods or destruction of unused potatoes at a loss.
Increases in commodity costs may have a negative impact on profits.
A significant portion of our cost of goods comes from commodities such as oil and energy. Commodities are subject to
price volatility caused by commodity market fluctuations, supply and demand, currency fluctuations, external conditions such as
weather and changes in governmental agricultural and energy policies and regulations. Commodity price increases will increase
our operating costs. We may not be able to increase our product prices and achieve cost savings that fully offset these increased
costs; and increasing prices may result in reduced sales volume and decreased profitability. There is currently no active
derivatives market for potatoes in the United States. Although we have experience in hedging against commodity price increases,
these practices and experience reduce, but do not eliminate, the risk of negative profit impacts from commodity price
increases. As a result, the risk management procedures that we use may not always work as we intend.
If we do not achieve the appropriate cost structure in the highly competitive value-added frozen potato product category, our
profitability could decrease.
Our future success and earnings growth depend in part on our ability to maintain the appropriate cost structure and
operate efficiently in the highly competitive value-added frozen potato product category. We continue to implement profit-
enhancing initiatives that improve the efficiency of our supply chain and general and administrative functions. These initiatives
are focused on cost-saving opportunities in procurement, manufacturing, logistics, and customer service, as well as general and
administrative overhead levels. However, gaining additional efficiencies may become more difficult over time. Our failure to
reduce costs through productivity gains or the elimination of redundant costs could adversely affect our profitability and weaken
our competitive position.
Changes in our relationships with our growers could adversely affect us.
We expend considerable resources to develop and maintain relationships with many potato growers. In some instances,
we have entered into long-term agreements with growers; however, a portion of our potato needs are typically sourced on an
annual basis. To the extent we are unable to maintain positive relationships with our long-term growers, contracted growers
deliver less supply than we expect, or we are unable to secure sufficient potatoes from uncontracted growers in a given year, we
may not have sufficient potato supply to satisfy our business opportunities. To obtain sufficient potato supply, we may be
required to purchase potatoes at prices substantially higher than expected, or forgo sales to some market segments, which would
reduce our profitability. If we forgo sales to such market segments, we may lose customers and may not be able to replace them
later.
Changes in our relationships with significant customers could adversely affect us.
We maintain a diverse customer base across our four reporting segments. Customers include global, national and
regional quick serve and fast casual restaurants as well as small, independently operated restaurants, multinational, broadline
foodservice distributors, as well as regional foodservice distributors, and major food retailers. Some of these
14
Table of Contents
customers independently represent a meaningful portion of our sales. While we contract annually or biannually with many of our
foodservice customers, loss of a significant customer could materially impact the business. In addition, shelf space at food
retailers is not guaranteed. During each of fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, our largest customer, McDonald’s Corporation and its
affiliates, accounted for approximately 11% of our net sales. There can be no assurance that our customers will continue to
purchase our products in the same quantities or on the same terms as in the past. The loss of a significant customer or a material
reduction in sales to a significant customer could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of
operations.
The sophistication and buying power of some of our customers could have a negative impact on profits.
Some of our customers are large and sophisticated, with buying power and negotiating strength. These customers may be
more capable of resisting price increases and more likely to demand lower pricing, increased promotional programs, or specialty
tailored products. In addition, some of these customers (e.g., larger distributors and supermarkets) have the scale to develop
supply chains that permit them to operate with reduced inventories or to develop and market their own brands. We continue to
implement initiatives to counteract these pressures, including efficiency programs and investments in innovation and
quality. However, if we are unable to counteract the negotiating strength of these customers, our profitability could decline.
We must identify changing consumer preferences and consumption trends and develop and offer food products to our
customers that help meet those preferences and trends.
Consumer preferences evolve over time and our success depends on our ability to identify the tastes and dietary habits of
consumers and offer products that appeal to those preferences. We need to continue to respond to these changing consumer
preferences and support our customers in their efforts to evolve to meet those preferences. For example, as consumers focus on
freshly prepared foods, some restaurants may choose to limit the frying capabilities of their kitchens. As a result, we would need
to evolve our product offering to provide alternatives that work in such a preparation environment. In addition, our products
contain carbohydrates, sodium, genetically modified ingredients, added sugars, saturated fats, and preservatives, the diet and
health effects of which remain the subject of public scrutiny. We must continue to reformulate our products, introduce new
products and create product extensions without a loss of the taste, texture, and appearance that consumers demand in value-added
potato products. All of these efforts require significant research and development and marketing investments. If our products fail
to meet consumer preferences or customer requirements, or we fail to introduce new and improved products on a timely basis,
then the return on those investments will be less than anticipated, which could materially and adversely affect our business,
financial condition, and results of operations.
A portion of our business is, and several of our growth strategies are, conducted through joint ventures that do not operate
solely for our benefit.
We have built our company, in part, through the creation of joint ventures, some of which we do not control. In these
relationships, we share ownership and management of a company that operates for the benefit of all owners, rather than our
exclusive benefit. Through our extensive experience in operating a portion of our business through joint ventures, we understand
that joint ventures often require additional resources and procedures for information sharing and decision-making. If our joint
venture partners take actions that have negative impacts on the joint venture, or disagree with the strategies we have developed to
grow these businesses, we may have limited ability to influence and mitigate those actions or decisions and our ability to achieve
our growth strategies may be negatively impacted.
If we are unable to complete potential acquisitions that strategically fit our business objectives, integrate acquired businesses,
or execute on large capital projects, our financial results could be materially and adversely affected.
From time to time, we evaluate acquisition candidates that may strategically fit our business objectives. Our acquisition
activities may present financial, managerial, and operational risks. Those risks include: (i) diversion of
15
Table of Contents
management attention from existing businesses, (ii) difficulties integrating personnel and financial and other systems,
(iii) difficulties implementing effective control environment processes, (iv) adverse effects on existing business relationships with
suppliers and customers, (v) inaccurate estimates of fair value made in the accounting for acquisitions and amortization of
acquired intangible assets, which would reduce future reported earnings, (vi) potential loss of customers or key employees of
acquired businesses, and (vii) indemnities and potential disputes with the sellers. If we are unable to complete acquisitions we
may identify or successfully integrate and develop acquired businesses or execute on large capital projects, such as new
production lines, our financial results could be materially and adversely affected.
New regulations imposed by the FDA or EFSA around acrylamide formation in french fried potato products could adversely
affect us.
The regulation of food products, both within the United States and internationally, continues to be a focus for
governmental scrutiny. The presence and/or formation of acrylamide in french fried potato products has become a global
regulatory issue as both the FDA and the European Food Safety Authority (“EFSA”) have issued guidance to the food processing
industry to work to reduce conditions that favor the formation of this naturally occurring compound. Acrylamide formation is the
result of heat processing reactions that give “browned foods” their desirable flavor. Acrylamide formation occurs in many food
types in the human diet, including but not limited to breads, toast, cookies, coffee, crackers, potatoes, and olives. The regulatory
approach to acrylamide has generally been to encourage the industry to achieve as low as reasonably achievable content levels
through process control (temperature) and material testing (low sugar and low asparagine). However, limits for acrylamide
content have been established for some food types in the State of California, and point of sale consumer warnings are required if
products exceed those limits. In addition, the EFSA has recently promulgated regulations establishing specific mitigation
measures, sampling and analysis procedures and benchmark levels for acrylamide in certain food products. If the global
regulatory approach to acrylamide becomes more stringent and additional legal limits are established, our manufacturing costs
could increase. In addition, if consumer perception regarding the safety of our products is negatively impacted due to regulation,
sales of our products could decrease.
If we fail to comply with the many laws and regulations applicable to our business, we may face lawsuits or incur significant
fines and penalties.
Our facilities and products are subject to many laws and regulations administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture,
the FDA, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, and other federal, state, local, and foreign governmental agencies
relating to the processing, packaging, storage, distribution, advertising, labeling, quality, and safety of food products, the health
and safety of our employees, and the protection of the environment. Our failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations
could subject us to lawsuits, administrative penalties, and civil remedies, including fines, injunctions, and recalls of our products.
Our operations are also subject to extensive and increasingly stringent regulations administered by the Environmental
Protection Agency, and comparable state agencies, which pertain to the discharge of materials into the environment and the
handling and disposition of wastes. Failure to comply with these regulations can have serious consequences, including civil and
administrative penalties and negative publicity. Changes in applicable laws or regulations or evolving interpretations thereof,
including increased government regulations to limit carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions as a result of concern
over climate change, may result in increased compliance costs, capital expenditures, and other financial obligations for us, which
could affect our profitability or impede the production or distribution of our products, which could adversely affect our business,
financial condition, and results of operations.
Litigation could expose us to significant costs and adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We are, or may become, party to various lawsuits and claims arising in the ordinary course of business, which may
include lawsuits or claims relating to commercial liability, product recalls, product liability, product claims,
16
Table of Contents
employment matters, environmental matters, or other aspects of our business. Litigation is inherently unpredictable, and although
we may believe we have meaningful defenses in these matters, we may incur judgments or enter into settlements of claims that
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations. The costs of responding to or
defending litigation may be significant and may divert the attention of management away from our strategic objectives. There
may also be adverse publicity associated with litigation that may decrease customer confidence in our business, regardless of
whether the allegations are valid or whether we are ultimately found liable. As a result, litigation may have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
We may be subject to product liability claims and product recalls, which could negatively impact our relationships with
customers and harm our business.
We sell food products for human consumption, which involves risks such as product contamination or spoilage, product
tampering, other adulteration of food products, mislabeling, and misbranding. We may voluntarily recall or withdraw products
from the market in certain circumstances, which would cause us to incur associated costs; those costs could be meaningful. We
may also be subject to litigation, requests for indemnification from our customers, or liability if the consumption or inadequate
preparation of any of our products causes injury, illness, or death. A significant product liability judgment or a widespread
product recall may negatively impact our sales and profitability for a period of time depending on the costs of the recall, the
destruction of product inventory, product availability, competitive reaction, customer reaction, and consumer attitudes. Even if a
product liability claim is unsuccessful or is not fully pursued, the negative publicity surrounding any assertion that our products
caused illness or injury could adversely affect our reputation with existing and potential customers and our corporate and brand
image.
Additionally, as a manufacturer and marketer of food products, we are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA and
other national, state and local government agencies. The Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act and the Food Safety Modernization Act and
their respective regulations govern, among other things, the manufacturing, composition and ingredients, packaging and safety of
food products. Some aspects of these laws use a strict liability standard for imposing sanctions on corporate behavior; meaning
that no intent is required to be established. If we fail to comply with applicable laws and regulations, we may be subject to civil
remedies, including fines, injunctions, recalls, or seizures, as well as criminal sanctions, any of which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Damage to our reputation as a trusted partner to customers and good corporate citizen could have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition, and results of operations.
Our customers rely on us and our co-manufacturers to manufacture safe, high quality food products. Product
contamination or tampering, the failure to maintain high standards for product quality, safety, and integrity, or allegations of
product quality issues, mislabeling or contamination, even if untrue, may damage the reputation of our customers, and ultimately
our reputation as a trusted industry partner. Damage to either could reduce demand for our products or cause production and
delivery disruptions.
Our reputation could also be adversely impacted by any of the following, or by adverse publicity (whether or not valid)
relating thereto: the failure to maintain high ethical, social, and environmental standards for our operations and activities; our
research and development efforts; our environmental impact, including use of agricultural materials, packaging, energy use, and
waste management; our failure to comply with local laws and regulations; our failure to maintain an effective system of internal
controls; or our failure to provide accurate and timely financial information. Damage to our reputation or loss of customer
confidence in our products for any of these or other reasons could result in decreased demand for our products and could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations, as well as require additional resources to
rebuild our reputation.
17
Table of Contents
Our results could be adversely impacted as a result of increased pension, labor and people-related expenses.
Inflationary pressures and any shortages in the labor market could increase labor costs, which could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. Our labor costs include the cost of providing employee
benefits in the United States and foreign jurisdictions, including pension, health and welfare, and severance benefits. Changes in
interest rates, mortality rates, health care costs, early retirement rates, investment returns, and the market value of plan assets can
affect the funded status of our defined benefit plans and cause volatility in the future funding requirements of the plans. A
significant increase in our obligations or future funding requirements could have a negative impact on our results of operations
and cash flows from operations. Additionally, the annual costs of benefits vary with increased costs of health care and the
outcome of collectively-bargained wage and benefit agreements.
We are significantly dependent on information technology, and we may be unable to protect our information systems against
service interruption, misappropriation of data, or breaches of security.
We rely on information technology networks and systems, including the Internet, to process, transmit, and store
electronic and financial information, to manage and support a variety of business processes and activities, and to comply with
regulatory, legal, and tax requirements. Our information technology systems, some of which are dependent on services provided
by third parties, may be vulnerable to damage, invasions, disruptions, or shutdowns due to any number of causes such as
catastrophic events, natural disasters, fires, power outages, systems failures, telecommunications failures, security breaches,
computer viruses, hackers, employee error or malfeasance, and other causes. Increased cybersecurity threats pose a potential risk
to the security and viability of our information technology systems, as well as the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the
data stored on those systems. If we do not allocate and effectively manage the resources necessary to build and sustain the proper
technology infrastructure and to maintain and protect the related automated and manual control processes, we could be subject to
billing and collection errors, business disruptions, or damage resulting from security breaches. If any of our significant
information technology systems suffer severe damage, disruption, or shutdown and our business continuity plans do not
effectively resolve the issues in a timely manner, our product sales, financial condition, and results of operations may be
materially and adversely affected, and we could experience delays in reporting our financial results. Any interruption of our
information technology systems could have operational, reputational, legal, and financial impacts that may have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, if we are unable to prevent security breaches or unauthorized disclosure of non-public information, we may
suffer financial and reputational damage, litigation or remediation costs, fines, or penalties because of the unauthorized disclosure
of confidential information belonging to us or to our partners, customers or suppliers.
Misuse, leakage, or falsification of information could result in violations of data privacy laws and regulations,
potentially significant fines and penalties, damage to our reputation and credibility, loss of strategic opportunities, and loss of
ability to commercialize products developed through research and development efforts and, therefore, could have a negative
impact on net sales. In addition, we may face business interruptions, litigation, and financial and reputational damage because of
lost or misappropriated confidential information belonging to us, our current or former employees, or to our suppliers or
customers, and may become subject to legal action and increased regulatory oversight. We could also be required to spend
significant financial and other resources to remedy the damage caused by a security breach or to repair or replace networks and
information systems.
There are inherent limitations on the effectiveness of our controls.
We do not expect that our disclosure controls or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all
errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well-designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute,
assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that resource
constraints exist, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations
in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements
18
Table of Contents
due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. The design of any
system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that
any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of the
effectiveness of controls to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate due to changes in
conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures. If our controls become inadequate, we could
fail to meet our financial reporting obligations, our reputation may be adversely affected, our business, financial condition, and
results of operations could be adversely affected, and the market price of our stock could decline.
If we are unable to attract and retain key personnel, our business could be materially and adversely affected.
Our success depends on our ability to attract and retain personnel with professional and technical expertise, such as
agricultural and food manufacturing experience, as well as finance, marketing, and other senior management professionals. The
market for these employees is competitive, and we could experience difficulty from time to time in hiring and retaining the
personnel necessary to support our business. If we do not succeed in retaining our current employees and attracting new high-
quality employees, our business could be materially and adversely affected.
Climate change, or legal, regulatory, or market measures to address climate change, may negatively affect our business and
operations.
There is growing concern that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases in the atmosphere may have an adverse impact
on global temperatures, weather patterns, the frequency and severity of extreme weather, and natural disasters. In the event that
climate change has a negative effect on agricultural productivity, we may be subject to decreased availability or less favorable
pricing for certain commodities that are necessary for our products, such as potatoes and oils. In addition, water is an important
part of potato processing. We may be subjected to decreased availability or less favorable pricing for water, which could impact
our manufacturing and distribution operations. The increasing concern over climate change also may result in more regional,
federal, and/or global legal and regulatory requirements to reduce or mitigate the effects of greenhouse gases, as well as more
stringent regulation of water rights. In the event that such regulation is enacted and is more aggressive than the sustainability
measures that we are currently undertaking to monitor our emissions, improve our energy efficiency, and reduce and reuse water,
we may experience significant increases in our costs of operation and delivery. As a result, climate change could negatively affect
our business and operations.
Deterioration of general economic conditions could harm our business and results of operations.
Our business, financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by changes in national or global
economic conditions, including interest rates, access to capital markets, consumer spending rates, energy availability and costs
(including fuel surcharges), and the effects of governmental initiatives to manage economic conditions.
Volatility in financial markets and deterioration of national and global economic conditions could impact our business
and operations in a variety of ways, including as follows:
·
·
·
decreased demand in the restaurant business, particularly fast food and casual dining, which may adversely affect
our business;
volatility in commodity and other input costs could substantially impact our results of operations;
volatility in the financial markets or interest rates could substantially impact our pension costs and required pension
contributions;
19
Table of Contents
·
·
it may become more costly or difficult to obtain debt or equity financing to fund operations or investment
opportunities, or to refinance our debt in the future, in each case on terms and within a time period acceptable to us;
and
it may become more costly to access funds internationally.
Impairment in the carrying value of goodwill or other intangibles could result in the incurrence of impairment charges and
negatively impact our net worth.
As of May 27, 2018, we had goodwill of $135.1 million and other intangibles of $35.4 million. The net carrying value
of goodwill represents the fair value of acquired businesses in excess of identifiable assets and liabilities as of the acquisition date
(or subsequent impairment date, if applicable). The net carrying value of other intangibles represents the fair value of trademarks,
customer relationships, and other acquired intangibles as of the acquisition date (or subsequent impairment date, if applicable),
net of accumulated amortization. Goodwill and other acquired intangibles expected to contribute indefinitely to our cash flows are
not amortized, but must be evaluated by management at least annually for impairment. Amortized intangible assets are evaluated
for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstance indicate that the carrying amounts of these assets may not be
recoverable. Impairments to goodwill and other intangible assets may be caused by factors outside our control, such as increasing
competitive pricing pressures, lower than expected revenue and profit growth rates, changes in industry earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) multiples, changes in discount rates based on changes in cost of capital (interest
rates, etc.), or the bankruptcy of a significant customer, and could result in the incurrence of impairment charges and negatively
impact our net worth.
We have a limited operating history as an independent public company, and our historical financial information is not
necessarily indicative of our future financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows nor do they reflect what our
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows would have been as an independent public company during the periods
presented.
Our historical financial statements do not necessarily reflect what our financial condition, results of operations, or cash
flows would have been as an independent public company during certain of the periods presented and is not necessarily indicative
of our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows for future periods. This is primarily a result of the following factors:
·
·
·
our historical combined financial results prior to the Separation reflect allocations of expenses for services
historically provided by Conagra, and may not fully reflect the increased costs associated with being an
independent public company, including significant changes in our cost structure, management, financing
arrangements, and business operations as a result of our spinoff from Conagra;
our working capital requirements and capital expenditures historically have been satisfied as part of Conagra’s
corporate-wide capital access, capital allocation, and cash management programs; our debt structure and cost of
debt and other capital is significantly different from that reflected in our historical combined financial statements;
and
our historical combined financial information may not fully reflect the effects of certain liabilities that were
incurred or assumed by us and may not fully reflect the effects of certain assets that were transferred to, and
liabilities that were assumed by, Conagra.
20
Table of Contents
We are subject to significant restrictions under a tax matters agreement.
In connection with the spinoff, we entered into a tax matters agreement with Conagra. The tax matters agreement
generally prohibits us, during the two-year period following the spinoff, from taking certain actions that could cause the spinoff
and certain related transactions to fail to qualify as tax-free transactions. These restrictions include:
·
·
·
·
·
we may not cause or permit certain business combinations or transactions to occur;
we may not discontinue the active conduct of our business (within the meaning of Section 355(b)(2) of the Internal
Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“Code”));
we may not sell or otherwise issue our common stock, other than pursuant to issuances that satisfy certain
regulatory safe harbors set forth in Treasury regulations related to stock issued to employees and retirement plans;
we may not redeem or otherwise acquire any of our common stock, other than pursuant to certain open-market
repurchases of less than 20% of our common stock (in the aggregate); and
we may not amend our certificate of incorporation (or other organizational documents) or take any other action,
whether through a stockholder vote or otherwise, affecting the voting rights of our common stock.
In addition, during the five-year period following the spinoff, we may not retire, repurchase, or significantly modify our
senior notes. Further, more generally, we may not take any action that could reasonably be expected to cause the spinoff and
certain related transactions to fail to qualify as tax-free transactions under Section 368(a)(1)(D) and Section 355 of the Code. If
we take any of the actions above and the actions result in tax-related losses to Conagra, we generally will be required to
indemnify Conagra for such tax-related losses under the tax matters agreement. Due to these restrictions and indemnification
obligations under the tax matters agreement, we may be limited in our ability to pursue strategic transactions, equity or
convertible debt financings or other transactions that may otherwise be in our best interests. Also, our potential indemnity
obligation to Conagra might discourage, delay or prevent a change of control that our stockholders may consider favorable.
If the spinoff is taxable to Conagra as a result of a breach by us of any covenant or representation made by us in the tax
matters agreement, we will generally be required to indemnify Conagra; the obligation to make a payment on this
indemnification obligation could have a material adverse effect on us.
It was intended that the spinoff, together with certain related transactions, would qualify as a tax-free “reorganization”
within the meaning of Section 368(a)(1)(D) of the Code and a tax-free distribution within the meaning of Section 355 of the
Code. In connection with the spinoff, Conagra received an opinion of tax counsel to the effect that those transactions will qualify
for their intended tax treatment. However, an opinion of tax counsel does not preclude the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) or
the courts from adopting a contrary position. The tax opinion relied on certain representations, covenants, and assumptions,
including those relating to our and Conagra’s past and future conduct; if any of those representations, covenants or assumptions is
inaccurate, the tax consequences of the spinoff could differ from the intended tax treatment. If the spinoff and/or certain related
transactions fail to qualify for tax-free treatment, for any reason, Conagra and/or holders of its common stock would be subject to
tax as a result of the spinoff and certain related transactions.
If the spinoff and/or the related transactions are not treated as tax-free transactions or are taxable to Conagra due to a
breach by us (or any of our subsidiaries) of any covenant or representation made by us in the tax matters agreement, we will
generally be required to indemnify Conagra for all tax-related losses suffered by Conagra in connection with the spinoff. In
addition, we will not control the resolution of any tax contest relating to taxes suffered by Conagra in connection
21
Table of Contents
with the spinoff, and we may not control the resolution of tax contests relating to any other taxes for which we may ultimately
have an indemnity obligation under the tax matters agreement. In the event that Conagra suffers tax-related losses in connection
with the spinoff that must be indemnified by us under the tax matters agreement, the indemnification liability could have a
material adverse effect on us.
We are subject to continuing contingent liabilities following the spinoff, including potential indemnification liabilities to
Conagra, and these liabilities could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations,
and cash flows.
In connection with the spinoff, we entered into a separation and distribution agreement with Conagra that provides for,
among other things, the principal corporate transactions required to effect the spinoff, certain conditions to the spinoff, and
provisions governing the relationship between our company and Conagra with respect to and resulting from the spinoff. Among
other things, the separation and distribution agreement provides for indemnification obligations designed to make us financially
responsible for substantially all liabilities that may exist relating to the Lamb Weston business, whether incurred prior to or after
the spinoff, and whether known or unknown at the time of the spinoff, as well as those obligations of Conagra assumed by us
pursuant to the separation and distribution agreement. If we are required to indemnify Conagra under the circumstances set forth
in the separation and distribution agreement, or meaningful unknown liabilities surface, we may be subject to substantial
liabilities.
In addition, under the Code and applicable Treasury regulations, each corporation that was a member of the Conagra
consolidated tax reporting group during any taxable period or portion of any taxable period ending on or before the completion of
the spinoff is jointly and severally liable for the federal income tax liability of the entire Conagra consolidated tax reporting group
for that taxable period. Similar rules may apply for state, local, and non-U.S. tax purposes. In addition, the tax matters agreement
with Conagra allocates the responsibility for prior period taxes of any Conagra consolidated, combined, unitary or other tax
reporting group between us and Conagra. However, if Conagra is unable to pay any prior period taxes for which it is responsible
under the tax matters agreement, we could be required to pay the entire amount of those taxes, which could materially and
adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
In connection with the spinoff, Conagra agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities. However, there can be no assurance that
the indemnity will be sufficient to insure us against the full amount of such liabilities, or that Conagra’s ability to satisfy its
indemnification obligations will not be impaired in the future.
Pursuant to the separation and distribution agreement, Conagra agreed to indemnify us for certain liabilities. However,
third parties could seek to hold us responsible for any of the liabilities that Conagra has agreed to retain, and there can be no
assurance that the indemnity from Conagra will be sufficient to protect us against the full amount of those liabilities, or that
Conagra will be able to fully satisfy its indemnification obligations. Moreover, even if we ultimately succeed in recovering from
Conagra any amounts for which we are held liable, we may be temporarily required to bear these losses ourselves. If Conagra is
unable to satisfy its indemnification obligations, the underlying liabilities could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
Further, Conagra’s insurers may deny coverage to us for liabilities associated with occurrences prior to the spinoff. Even
if we ultimately succeed in recovering from such insurance providers, we may be required to temporarily bear such loss of
coverage.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.
22
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
We are headquartered in Eagle, Idaho and at May 27, 2018, we own and lease operating plants, office and support
facilities, and farms in the following locations:
Location
Type of Facility and Number
Owned/ Leased
Domestic:
American Falls, ID
Boardman, OR
Bentonville, AR
Boise, ID
Connell, WA
Delhi, LA
Eagle, ID
Hermiston, OR
Kennewick, WA
Miami, FL
Naperville, IL
Orlando, FL
Pasco, WA
Paterson, WA
Quincy, WA
Richland, WA
Twin Falls, ID
International:
Beijing, China
Mexico City, Mexico
Shanghai, China
Shangdu, China
Singapore
Taber, Canada
Tokyo, Japan
Plant
Plant (3), Cold Storage
Office/Support Facility
Office/Support Facility
Plant
Plant
Office/Support Facility
Plant
Office/Support Facility (6)
Office/Support Facility
Office/Support Facility
Office/Support Facility
Plant (2)
Plant, Farm (4)
Plant
Plant, Office/Support Facility (3)
Plant
Office/Support Facility
Office/Support Facility
Office/Support Facility
Plant, Farm
Office/Support Facility
Plant, Cold Storage
Office/Support Facility
Owned (1)
Owned (4)
Leased (1)
Leased (1)
Owned (1)
Owned (1)
Leased (1)
Owned (1)
Owned (1), Leased (5)
Leased (1)
Leased (1)
Leased (1)
Owned (2)
Owned (1), Leased (4)
Owned (1)
Owned (3), Leased (1)
Owned (1)
Leased (1)
Leased (1)
Leased (1)
Owned (1), Leased (1)
Leased (1)
Owned (2)
Leased (1)
We use our farms as a source of raw materials, to better understand the costs of growing potatoes, and to deploy
agronomic research. Our facilities vary in age and condition, and each of them has an active maintenance program to ensure a
safe operating environment and to keep the facilities in good condition. We believe all our buildings are in satisfactory operating
condition to conduct our business as intended.
Our manufacturing assets are shared across all reporting segments. Therefore, we do not identify or allocate assets by
operating segment. For more information, see Note 13, Segments, of the Notes to Combined and Consolidated Financial
Statements in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K.
In addition to the facilities noted above, our joint ventures own or lease warehouses and distribution facilities in Canada,
China, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, Austria, Russia, and the United States.
23
Table of Contents
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
For information regarding our legal proceedings, see Note 14, Commitments, Contingencies, Guarantees, and Legal
Proceedings, of the Notes to Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data" of this Form 10-K.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
None.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock is listed on the NYSE under the ticker symbol “LW.” At July 16, 2018, there were 13,439 holders of
record of our common stock. The majority of holders of Lamb Weston common stock are “street name” or beneficial holders,
whose shares of record are held by banks, brokers, and other financial institutions. Information regarding the market price of our
common stock and dividends declared since the Separation is included in Note 15, Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited), of the
Notes to Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of
this Form 10-K.
Dividend Policy
We expect to continue to pay regular cash dividends, although there is no assurance as to the timing or level of future
dividend payments. The declaration of dividends is subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors and depends on various
factors, including our net earnings, capital requirements, financial condition, future prospects and other factors that our Board of
Directors deems relevant to its analysis and decision making.
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer
The following table presents information related to our repurchases of common stock made during the thirteen weeks
ended May 27, 2018:
Period
February 26, 2018 through March 25, 2018
March 26, 2018 through April 22, 2018
April 23, 2018 through May 27, 2018
Total
Total Number
of Shares (or
units)
Purchased (a)
Average
Price Paid
Per Share
(or unit)
173 $
11,269
—
11,442 $
55.05
57.70
—
57.66
Total Number of
Shares
Purchased as Part of
Approximate Dollar
Value of Maximum
Number of Shares that
Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs
May Yet be Purchased
Under the Program
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(a) We issue restricted stock units (“RSUs”) as part of our equity incentive plans. In our combined and consolidated financial statements,
we treat shares of common stock withheld for tax purposes on behalf of our employees in connection with the vesting of RSUs as
common stock repurchases because they reduce the number of shares that would have been issued upon vesting.
24
Table of Contents
Performance Graph
The following graph and table compares the cumulative total return on our common stock with the cumulative total
return of the Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) 400 Midcap Index and the S&P Packaged Food Index, which we consider to be our peer
group. This graph covers the period from November 10, 2016 (the first day our common stock began trading on NYSE) through
May 25, 2018 (the last trading day of our fiscal year). The graph and table assume that $100 was invested in our common stock,
the S&P 400 Midcap Index, and the S&P Packaged Food Index on November 10, 2016, and that all dividends were reinvested.
Lamb Weston
S&P 400 Midcap Index
S&P Packaged Food Index
November 10,
2016
May 26,
2017
May 27,
2018
$
$
$
100.00
100.00
100.00
$
$
$
151.99
112.44
111.15
$
$
$
220.92
128.83
110.20
The above performance graph and other information furnished under this Part II, Item 5 of this Form 10-K shall not be
deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C, or to the provisions of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
25
Table of Contents
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table sets forth selected historical financial data of Lamb Weston (dollars in millions, except per share
data). The information contained in the table should be read in conjunction with the disclosures in "Part II, Item 7. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and "Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data" of this Form 10-K.
For the Fiscal Years Ended May
Statement of Earnings Data:
Net sales
Income from operations (a)
Income before income taxes and equity method
earnings (a)
Equity method investment earnings
Income tax expense (b)
Net income attributable to Lamb Weston Holdings,
Inc. (a) (b)
Earnings per share (a) (b) (c)
Basic
Diluted
Dividends declared per common share
Balance Sheet Data:
Total assets
Long-term debt, excluding current portion
Non-GAAP Financial Information: (d)
EBITDA including unconsolidated joint ventures
Adjusted EBITDA including unconsolidated joint
ventures
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
$
3,423.7 $
580.1
3,168.0 $
518.3
2,993.8 $
373.3
2,925.0 $
381.4
2,815.2
363.7
471.3
83.6
121.2
457.1
53.3
170.2
367.4
71.7
144.5
375.3
42.7
140.4
358.4
29.6
117.7
416.8
326.9
285.3
268.3
260.9
2.83
2.82
0.75750
2.22
2.22
0.37500
1.92
1.92
N/A
1.83
1.83
N/A
1.77
1.77
N/A
2,752.6
2,336.7
811.7
820.4
2,485.6
2,365.0
2,158.3
104.6
2,055.9
86.5
1,930.0
124.3
683.7
707.1
546.2
593.4
525.4
526.1
479.3
502.5
(a)
Includes comparability items which are not considered part of our ongoing operations. For more information on these costs see “Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of this Form 10-K.
(b) Compared with fiscal 2017, the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (the “Tax Act”) decreased income tax expense and increased net
income by $64.7 million, or $0.44, including a $36.3 million, or $0.25 per share, tax benefit related to a lower U.S. corporate tax rate
and a provisional $28.4 million, or $0.19 per share, benefit from the re-measurement of our net U.S. deferred tax liabilities using the
new U.S. federal statutory tax rate, partially offset by a transition tax on previously untaxed foreign earnings.
(c) Earnings per share prior to the Separation in fiscal 2017 was calculated based on 146 million shares of Lamb Weston common stock
that were distributed to Conagra stockholders on November 9, 2016.
(d) EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA including unconsolidated joint ventures are non-GAAP financial measures. See the discussion of non-
GAAP financial measures and the reconciliations under “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations – Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures to Reported Amounts” of this Form 10‑K.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis is intended to provide a summary of significant factors relevant to our financial
performance and condition. The discussion and analysis should be read together with our combined and consolidated financial
statements and related notes in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of
26
Table of Contents
this Form 10-K. Results for the fiscal year ended May 27, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be attained in the
future.
Overview
Lamb Weston, along with its joint venture partners, is a leading global producer, distributor, and marketer of value-
added frozen potato products. We, along with our joint venture partners, are the number one supplier of value-added frozen potato
products in North America. We are also a leading supplier of value-added frozen potato products internationally, with a strong
and growing presence in high-growth emerging markets. We, along with our joint venture partners, offer a broad product
portfolio to a diverse channel and customer base in over 100 countries. French fries represent the majority of our value-added
frozen potato product portfolio.
On November 9, 2016, we separated from Conagra and became an independent publicly traded company through the pro
rata distribution by Conagra of 100% of our outstanding common stock to Conagra stockholders. In connection with the
Separation, Conagra transferred substantially all of the assets and liabilities and operations of the Lamb Weston business to us.
Combined financial statements prior to the Separation were prepared on a stand-alone basis and were derived from Conagra’s
consolidated financial statements and accounting records and reflect our financial position, results of operations, comprehensive
income and cash flows as our business was operated as part of Conagra prior to the Separation and includes allocations for a
portion of Conagra’s shared corporate general and administrative expenses. The combined financial position, results of
operations, and cash flows as of dates and for periods prior to the Separation may not be indicative of what our financial position,
results of operations, and cash flows would have been as a separate stand-alone public company during the periods presented, nor
are they indicative of what our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows may be in the future.
Management’s discussion and analysis of our results of operations and financial condition, which we refer to in this
filing as “MD&A,” is provided as a supplement to the combined and consolidated financial statements and related notes included
elsewhere in this Form 10-K to help provide an understanding of our financial condition, changes in financial condition and
results of our operations. Our MD&A is based on financial data derived from the financial statements prepared in accordance with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and certain other financial data (Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA
including unconsolidated joint ventures and Adjusted Diluted EPS) that is prepared using non-GAAP financial measures. See
“Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures to Reported Amounts” below for the definitions of Adjusted EBITDA,
Adjusted EBITDA including unconsolidated joint ventures and Adjusted Diluted EPS, and a reconciliation of these non-GAAP
financial measures to net income or diluted earnings per share.
Executive Summary
We had strong performance in fiscal 2018. Our financial results reflected the favorable operating environment that the
Company has enjoyed over the past couple years. Our results also reflect our focus on delivering our strategic and operational
objectives through an ongoing commitment to support our customers’ growth by investing in additional capacity, maintaining
high levels of service, and developing innovative products and limited time offerings. Specifically, in fiscal 2018, compared with
fiscal 2017:
·
·
Net sales increased $255.7 million, or 8%, to $3,423.7 million, compared with fiscal 2017. Price/mix increased 6%
due to pricing actions and favorable product and customer mix. Volume increased 2%, including growth in each of
our core operating segments.
Net income attributable to Lamb Weston increased $89.9 million, or 28%, to $416.8 million, and diluted earnings
per share increased $0.60, or 27%, to $2.82. The increase was driven by lower income tax expense related to the
Tax Act; net sales growth, higher equity method investment earnings; and lower expenses
27
Table of Contents
related to the Separation; partially offset by higher production costs, selling, general and administrative expenses
and interest expense.
Excluding $28.4 million of income tax benefits from U.S. tax reform and $8.7 million ($5.7 million after taxes) and
$26.5 million ($16.7 million after taxes) of costs related to the Separation in fiscal year 2018 and 2017,
respectively, and a $3.1 million ($2.0 million after-tax) non-cash gain on assets in fiscal 2017, net income
attributable to Lamb Weston increased approximately $52.5 million to $394.1 million.
Adjusted Diluted EPS increased $0.34, or 15%, to $2.66. Approximately $0.25 of the increase was driven by a
lower U.S. corporate tax rate as a result of the Tax Act. The remainder of the increase reflects growth in income
from operations and equity method investment earnings, partially offset by higher interest expense.
Adjusted EBITDA including unconsolidated joint ventures increased $113.3 million, or 16%, to $820.4 million,
reflecting growth in income from operations and equity method investment earnings.
Gross profit increased $100.7 million, or 13%, to $879.5 million, driven by favorable price/mix, sales volume
growth and supply chain efficiency savings, partially offset by input, manufacturing, transportation and
warehousing cost inflation, higher depreciation expense primarily related to our new french fry production line in
Richland, Washington, and higher incentive compensation costs.
Equity method investment earnings increased $30.3 million to $83.6 million, and included a nominal unrealized
loss related to mark-to-market adjustments associated with currency and commodity hedging contracts compared to
a $3.6 million gain in the prior year, a $5.4 million foreign currency translation benefit, and an approximate $4
million gain related to a divestiture of a non-core business.
Net cash provided by operating activities for fiscal 2018 was $481.2 million, compared with $446.9 million in the
prior year. During fiscal 2018, we added $309.0 million of capital assets and paid $110.2 million in dividends to
stockholders.
The Global segment’s net sales increased to $1,744.2 million, up $119.4 million, with price/mix up 5% and volume
up 2%, compared with fiscal 2017. Global segment product contribution margin increased $37.1 million to $375.7
million.
The Foodservice segment’s net sales increased $69.1 million to $1,099.1 million, with price/mix up 6% and volume
up 1%. Foodservice segment product contribution margin increased $35.2 million to $365.9 million.
The Retail segment’s net sales increased $64.3 million to $449.2 million, with volume up 12% and price/mix up
5%. Retail segment product contribution margin increased $9.7 million to $87.3 million.
The Other segment’s net sales increased $2.9 million to $131.2 million, with price/mix up 7% and volume down
5%. Other segment product contribution margin increased $9.7 million to $19.0 million.
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
·
Demand for frozen potato products continues to grow around the world. We expect to meet the increase in demand by
investing in additional capacity. We began operating a new production line in Richland, Washington and Boardman, Oregon
during the third quarter of fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively, and we expect to begin operating a new production line in
Hermiston, Oregon by the end of the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019. Additionally, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, our Lamb-
Weston/Meijer joint venture, in conjunction with a partner in the Russian Federation, initiated production at a newly-constructed
french fry processing facility in Lipetsk, a special economic zone in south Moscow. In June 2017, our Lamb-Weston/Meijer joint
venture also acquired the potato processing business of Oerlemans Foods, which included a potato processing facility located in
Broekhuizenvorst, the Netherlands.
Markets
We operate in the global value-added frozen potato products industry, with the majority of our sales derived from
products sold to customers in North America, and the remainder sold to customers primarily in Asia, Europe, Latin America,
Oceania and the Middle East.
In general, demand for frozen potato products grew steadily in fiscal 2018. In North America, volume demand growth
was driven by quick service restaurant chains (“QSRs”) and casual dining restaurant chains. Internationally,
28
Table of Contents
demand growth was driven by increased access to consumers through continued expansion in these markets by both North
America-based QSRs, local QSRs, and restaurant chains. In addition, in emerging markets, demand growth was driven by
increased affordability due to higher per capita incomes and increased appeal of Western-style food offerings and diets.
In this environment of growing volume demand, there was limited available capacity to produce frozen potato products
in fiscal 2018, especially in North America, which led to increased prices across the industry.
Outlook
In fiscal 2019, we expect the operating environment to be generally favorable given the continued growth in volume
demand and high industry manufacturing capacity utilization levels. A number of manufacturers, including Lamb Weston, have
announced intentions to add production capacity over the next five years, largely in Europe, North America and China, which will
likely ease the industry’s near-term production constraints. In addition, compared with fiscal 2018, we expect a higher rate of
inflation for many of our commodity, manufacturing, transportation and warehousing costs. We also expect significantly higher
selling, general and administrative costs as a result of investments in our information systems and enterprise resource planning
infrastructure, as well as sales, marketing, innovation, operations and other functional capabilities, designed to drive operating
efficiencies and support future growth.
Results of Operations
We have four reportable segments: Global, Foodservice, Retail, and Other. For each period presented, we report net
sales and product contribution margin by segment. Net sales and product contribution margin are the primary measures reported
to our chief operating decision maker for purposes of allocating resources to our segments and assessing their performance. We
define product contribution margin as net sales less cost of sales and advertising and promotion expenses. Product contribution
margin excludes general corporate expenses and interest expense because management believes these amounts are not directly
associated with segment performance for the period. For additional information on our reportable segments, see Note 13,
Segments, of the Notes to Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and
Supplementary Data” in this Form 10-K.
Fiscal Year Ended May 27, 2018 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended May 28, 2017
Net Sales and Product Contribution Margin (dollars in millions)
For the Fiscal Years Ended May
Global
Foodservice
Retail
Other
Total
Net Sales
2018
Net Sales
2017
$ 1,744.2 $ 1,624.8
1,030.0
384.9
128.3
$ 3,423.7 $ 3,168.0
1,099.1
449.2
131.2
Inc/(Dec)
7% $
7%
17%
2%
8% $
Product Contribution Margin
2017
2018
375.7 $
365.9
87.3
19.0
847.9 $
338.6
330.7
77.6
9.3
756.2
Inc/(Dec)
11%
11%
13%
NM
12%
Lamb Weston’s net sales for fiscal 2018 were $3,423.7 million, an increase of $255.7 million, or 8%, compared with
fiscal 2017. Net sales in fiscal 2018 reflect a 6% increase in price/mix and 2% increase in volume growth, with growth in each
core operating segment.
Global net sales increased $119.4 million, or 7%, to $1,744.2 million, compared with $1,624.8 million in fiscal 2017.
Net sales in fiscal 2018 reflect a 5% increase in price/mix associated with price increases in both domestic and international
markets, as well as improved customer and product mix. Sales volumes increased 2%, primarily driven by
29
Table of Contents
organic growth and new business with major restaurant chains in North America. While net sales in international markets
increased nominally, sales volumes declined as we chose to improve customer and product mix, as well as lower shipments to
certain export markets.
Foodservice net sales increased $69.1 million, or 7%, to $1,099.1 million, compared with $1,030.0 million in fiscal
2017. Net sales in fiscal 2018 reflect a 6% increase related to favorable pricing, as well as actions to improve customer and
product mix. Sales volume increased 1%, which was primarily related to growth of sales of Lamb
Weston
-branded and operator
label products to small and mid-sized restaurant chains, partially offset by lower sales volume of distributor label products.
Retail net sales increased $64.3 million, or 17%, to $449.2 million, compared with $384.9 million in fiscal 2017. Net
sales in fiscal 2018 reflect a 12% increase in sales volume, driven by distribution gains of Grown
in
Idaho
and other branded
products, as well as increased shipments of private label products. Price/mix increased 5%, reflecting higher prices across the
branded and private label portfolios, as well as improved mix, partially offset by higher trade investments to support expanded
distribution of Grown
in
Idaho
branded products.
Net sales in our Other segment increased $2.9 million, or 2%, to $131.2 million, compared with $128.3 million in fiscal
2017, primarily due to favorable product mix in our vegetable business.
Product Contribution Margin
Global product contribution margin increased $37.1 million, or 11%, to $375.7 million in fiscal 2018, as a result of
favorable price/ mix and volume growth. Global cost of sales was $1,361.8 million, or 6% higher in fiscal 2018, as compared to
fiscal 2017, largely due to higher volume, input, manufacturing, transportation and warehousing cost inflation, higher
depreciation expense primarily related to our new french fry production line in Richland, Washington, and higher incentive
compensation costs, partially offset by supply chain efficiency savings. Advertising and promotion spending was $0.9 million
higher in 2018, as compared to fiscal 2017.
Foodservice product contribution margin increased $35.2 million, or 11%, to $365.9 million in fiscal 2018, primarily as
a result of favorable price/mix. Cost of sales was $724.7 million, or 5% higher in fiscal 2018, as compared to fiscal 2017, largely
due to input, manufacturing, transportation and warehousing cost inflation, higher depreciation expense primarily related to our
new french fry production line in Richland, Washington, and higher compensation costs, partially offset by supply chain
efficiency savings. Advertising and promotion spending was $1.6 million higher in fiscal 2018, compared with fiscal 2017.
Retail product contribution margin increased $9.7 million, or 13%, to $87.3 million in fiscal 2018 due to favorable
price/mix and higher sales volumes. Cost of sales was $346.0 million, or 16% higher in fiscal 2018 as compared to fiscal 2017,
largely due to higher volume and transportation, warehousing, input and manufacturing cost inflation. Advertising and promotion
spending was $6.5 million higher in fiscal 2018, compared with fiscal 2017, as we invested behind the introduction of Grown
In
Idaho
branded products .
Other product contribution margin increased $9.7 million to $19.0 million in fiscal 2018, as compared to $9.3 million in
fiscal 2017. The increase was primarily due to a change in unrealized mark-to-market adjustments of approximately $4 million
related to our commodity option contracts and an expense in the prior year related to a recall of some vegetable products that were
produced by a third party.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased $38.9 million, or 15%, in fiscal 2018 compared with fiscal 2017.
Fiscal 2018 and 2017, included $8.7 million ($5.7 million after-tax) and $26.5 million ($16.7 million after-tax) of expenses for
costs related to the Separation, primarily related to professional fees and other employee-related costs. Fiscal 2017 also included a
$3.1 million ($2.0 million after-tax) non-cash gain on assets. Excluding these items, fiscal 2018,
30
Table of Contents
selling, general and administrative expenses increased $53.6 million, or 23%, versus the prior year largely due to incremental
costs associated with being a stand-alone public company, higher incentive compensation costs based on operating performance,
and a $9.0 million increase in advertising and promotional support. In addition, the increase in selling, general and administrative
expenses also includes approximately $5 million to establish a new Lamb Weston charitable foundation, and approximately $4
million of costs related to transitioning our Foodservice segment go-to-market strategy from a broker-led sales model to a direct
sales model.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net was $108.8 million in fiscal 2018, an increase of $47.6 million compared with fiscal 2017. The
increase in interest expense, net was the result of recognizing interest expense for a full-year for the debt incurred in connection
with the Separation, compared with recognizing approximately only seven months of interest expense on this debt during fiscal
2017.
For more information, see Note 9, Debt and Financing Obligations, of the Notes to Combined and Consolidated
Financial Statements in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Form 10-K. For the period prior to
the Separation, interest expense was included for only the legal entities that comprised the Lamb Weston business, and did not
include any allocated interest expense from Conagra.
Income Taxes
Income before income taxes and equity method earnings
Equity method investment earnings
Income tax expense
Effective tax rate
For the Fiscal Years
Ended May
2018
471.3 $
83.6
554.9 $
2017
457.1
53.3
510.4
$
$
$
121.2 $
170.2
21.8% (a)
33.3%
(a) Excluding $28.4 million of provisional impacts of the Tax Act, the effective tax rate was 27.0%. This rate varies from the fiscal 2018
U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 29.3%, primarily due to the impact of U.S. state taxes, the domestic manufacturers deduction, foreign
taxes, and other permanent differences.
The Tax Act decreased income tax expense by $64.7 million; $36.3 million of the decrease related to a lower U.S.
corporate tax rate and $28.4 million related to the provisional impacts of the Tax Act that was enacted in December 2017. For
further information on the Tax Act and its impact, see Note 4, Income Taxes, of the Notes to Combined and Consolidated
Financial Statements in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Form 10-K.
Equity Method Investment Earnings
We conduct meaningful business through unconsolidated joint ventures and include our share of the earnings based on
our economic ownership interest in them. Lamb Weston’s share of earnings from its equity method investments was $83.6 million
and $53.3 million for fiscal 2018 and 2017, respectively. These amounts included a nominal unrealized loss related to mark-to-
market adjustments associated with currency and commodity hedging contracts in the current year, and a $3.6 million gain related
to the contracts in fiscal 2017. Excluding these adjustments, earnings from equity method investments increased $33.9 million,
driven by solid operating results in Europe and the U.S., including lower raw potato and production costs in Europe, volume
growth, a $5.4 million foreign currency translation benefit, and an approximate $4 million gain related to a divestiture of a non-
core business. The increase was partially offset by lower price/mix in Europe. For more information about our joint ventures, see
Note 6, Investments in Joint Ventures, of the Notes to Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements in “Part II, Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Form 10-K.
31
Table of Contents
Fiscal Year Ended May 28, 2017 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended May 29, 2016
Net Sales and Product Contribution Margin (dollars in millions)
For the Fiscal Years Ended May
2017
Net Sales
2016
Inc/(Dec)
Product Contribution Margin
2016
Inc/(Dec)
2017
Global
Foodservice
Retail
Other
Total
Net Sales
$ 1,624.8 $ 1,549.4
946.0
372.1
126.3
$ 3,168.0 $ 2,993.8
1,030.0
384.9
128.3
5% $
9%
3%
2%
6% $
338.6 $
330.7
77.6
9.3
756.2 $
293.2
253.0
69.1
20.9
636.2
15%
31%
12%
(56%)
19%
Lamb Weston’s net sales for fiscal 2017 were $3,168.0 million, an increase of $174.2 million, or 6%, compared with
fiscal 2016. Net sales in fiscal 2017 reflect a 4% increase in price/mix and volume growth of 2%, with growth across our core
operating segments.
Global net sales increased $75.4 million, or 5%, to $1,624.8 million, compared with $1,549.4 million in fiscal 2016. Net
sales in fiscal 2017 reflect a 4% increase in sales volume, driven by growth domestically, which included organic growth and new
business with major restaurant chains, as well as growth in international markets. Additionally, net sales in fiscal 2017 reflect a
1% increase in price/mix associated with price increases in both domestic and international markets, as well as actions to improve
customer and product mix.
Foodservice net sales increased $84.0 million, or 9%, to $1,030.0 million, compared with $946.0 million in fiscal 2016.
Net sales in fiscal 2017 reflect an 8% increase related to favorable pricing, as well as actions to improve customer and product
mix. Sales volume increased 1%, which related to growth of small and mid-sized restaurant chain operators, as well as regional
and independent food distributors.
Retail net sales increased $12.8 million, or 3%, to $384.9 million, compared with $372.1 million in fiscal 2016. Net
sales in fiscal 2017 reflect a 2% increase related to favorable pricing and customer mix changes due to the increase of licensed
brands and trade efficiencies. Sales volume increased 1%, primarily driven by growth of licensed and private label products.
Net sales in our Other segment increased $2.0 million, or 2%, to $128.3 million, compared with $126.3 million in fiscal
2016, primarily due to favorable product mix in our vegetable business.
Product Contribution Margin
Global product contribution margin increased $45.4 million, or 15%, to $338.6 million in fiscal 2017, as a result of
favorable price/mix, supply chain efficiency savings, and volume growth. Global cost of sales was $1,280.4 million, or 3% higher
in fiscal 2017, as compared to fiscal 2016, largely due to higher volume, partially offset by supply chain efficiency savings.
Advertising and promotion spending was $1.1 million lower in 2017, as compared to fiscal 2016, driven by the timing of costs
related to our global rebranding in fiscal 2016.
Foodservice product contribution margin increased $77.7 million, or 31%, to $330.7 million in fiscal 2017 as a result of
favorable price/mix, supply chain efficiency savings, and volume growth. Cost of sales was $692.4 million, or 1% higher in fiscal
2017, as compared to fiscal 2016, largely due to higher volume, partially offset by supply chain efficiency savings. Advertising
and promotion spending was $0.3 million lower in fiscal 2017, compared with fiscal 2016.
32
Table of Contents
Retail product contribution margin increased $8.5 million, or 12%, to $77.6 million due to favorable price/mix. Cost of
sales was $297.8 million, or 2% higher in fiscal 2017 as compared to fiscal 2016, largely due to higher volume and higher supply
chain costs. Advertising and promotion spending was $1.7 million lower in fiscal 2017, compared with fiscal 2016, due to the
timing of marketing and promotional spending .
Other product contribution margin decreased $11.6 million, or 56%, to 9.3 million in fiscal 2017, due primarily to the
unrealized mark-to-market losses related to our commodity option contracts and lower sales volumes.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $28.0 million, or 10%, to $260.5 million in fiscal 2017,
compared with fiscal 2016. Fiscal 2017 included $26.5 million ($16.7 million after-tax) of expenses for costs related to the
Separation, primarily related to professional fees, and a $3.1 million ($2.0 million after-tax) non-cash gain on assets. Fiscal 2016
included $64.9 million ($45.3 million after-tax) of comparability items, primarily comprised of $59.5 million of actuarial losses
related to a pension liability and $5.3 million of costs related to the spinoff from Conagra. Excluding these costs for each fiscal
year, and the non-cash gain on assets, in fiscal 2017, selling, general and administrative expenses increased $13.5 million, or 6%,
versus the prior year largely due to incremental costs associated with being a stand-alone public company, as well as higher
incentive compensation costs attributable to our operating performance.
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net was $61.2 million in fiscal 2017, an increase of $55.3 million compared with fiscal 2016. The
increase in interest expense, net was the result of the debt incurred in connection with the Separation. For more information, see
Note 9, Debt and Financing Obligations, of the Notes to Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements in “Part II, Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Form 10-K. For the period prior to the Separation, interest expense was
included for only the legal entities that comprised the Lamb Weston business, and did not include any allocated interest expense
from Conagra.
Income Taxes
Income tax expense for fiscal 2017 and 2016 was $170.2 million and $144.5 million, respectively. The effective tax rate
(calculated as the ratio of income tax expense to pre-tax income, inclusive of equity method investment earnings) was
approximately 33% for both fiscal 2017 and 2016. The effective tax rate varied from the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35%
principally due to the impact of U.S. state taxes, the domestic manufacturers’ deduction, foreign taxes, and other permanent
differences.
Equity Method Investment Earnings
Lamb Weston’s share of earnings from its equity method investments was $53.3 million and $71.7 million for fiscal
2017 and 2016, respectively. Equity method investment earnings for fiscal 2017 were lower due to a $17.7 million non-cash gain
related to the settlement of a pension plan of Lamb-Weston/Meijer in fiscal 2016. In fiscal 2017, the effect of higher raw potato
costs in Europe were essentially offset by higher pricing, cost savings initiatives and a $3.6 million unrealized gain related to
mark-to-market adjustments associated with currency and commodity hedging contracts. For more information about our joint
ventures, see Note 6, Investments in Joint Ventures, of the Notes to Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements in “Part II,
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in this Form 10-K.
33
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources
In fiscal 2018, we generated $481.2 million of operating cash flow and made $309.0 million of capital expenditures,
which included expenditures for significant expansions at our Boardman, Oregon and Richland, Washington facilities. At
May 27, 2018, we had $55.6 million of cash and cash equivalents compared to $57.1 million at May 28, 2017. Additionally, we
had $496.6 million of available borrowing capacity on our revolving credit facility at May 27, 2018. Currently, our primary uses
of cash are for operations, capital expenditures, dividends on our common stock, debt service and income tax payments. The Tax
Act enacted in December 2017, imposes a tax on all previously untaxed foreign earnings. As a result, we recognized a provisional
transition tax expense of $11.5 million, which will primarily be paid over the next eight years.
We believe that net cash generated from operating activities, cash on hand, available borrowings under our revolving
credit facility, and available capital through access to capital markets will be adequate to meet our liquidity and capital
requirements, including payment of any dividends on our common stock declared, for at least the next twelve months.
Cash Flows
Below is a summary table of our cash flows, followed by a discussion of the sources and uses of cash through operating,
investing, and financing activities (dollars in millions):
For the Fiscal Years Ended May
2017
2018
2016
Net cash flows provided by (used for):
Operating activities
Investing activities
Financing activities
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Operating
Activities
Fiscal
2018
Compared
with
Fiscal
2017
$
$
481.2 $
(306.8)
(178.9)
(4.5)
3.0
(1.5) $
446.9 $
(285.3)
(142.0)
19.6
1.1
20.7 $
382.3
(144.3)
(232.8)
5.2
0.6
5.8
The major components of cash provided by operations are earnings from operations adjusted for non-cash income and
expense items and changes in working capital. Cash generated from operating activities increased $34.3 million to $481.2 million
in fiscal 2018, compared with $446.9 million in fiscal 2017. Earnings from continuing operations, adjusted for non-cash income
and expense and other items, increased $91.4 million primarily due to favorable price/mix, and volume. Changes in operating
assets and liabilities used $57.1 million more cash in fiscal 2018, compared with 2017. The decrease in cash provided by changes
in operating assets and liabilities was driven primarily by higher accounts receivable levels in fiscal 2018, compared to fiscal
2017 due to increased sales and timing of collections, the timing of payments for accrued expenses relating to employee
compensation and accrued interest in fiscal 2018, and the timing of payments for accounts payable. These cash outflows were
offset partially by lower payments for income taxes, primarily related to the Tax Act.
Fiscal
2017
Compared
with
Fiscal
2016
Cash generated from operating activities increased $64.6 million to $446.9 million in fiscal 2017, compared with $382.3
million in fiscal 2016. Earnings from continuing operations, adjusted for non-cash income and expense and other items, increased
$78.3 million due to favorable price/mix, supply chain efficiency savings, and volume growth. Cash
34
Table of Contents
provided by operating assets and liabilities decreased $13.7 million in fiscal 2017, compared with fiscal 2016. The decrease in
cash provided by changes in operating assets and liabilities was driven primarily by more cash required for taxes based on
operating performance, a build-up of inventory ahead of planned production outages to implement capital projects, and an
increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets related to the timing of grower prepayments, partially offset by increases in
accounts payable and accrued expenses, which related primarily to higher incentive compensation costs attributable to our
operating performance.
Investing
Activities
Fiscal
2018
Compared
with
Fiscal
2017
Investing activities used $306.8 million of cash in fiscal 2018, compared with $285.3 million in fiscal 2017. These
expenditures include plant capacity expansions at our Richland, Washington and Boardman, Oregon facilities.
We expect capital investments in fiscal 2019 to be approximately $360 million, which excludes acquisitions, but
includes approximately $200 million to complete the construction of the 300 million pound french fry production line in
Hermiston, Oregon, which is expected to be operational in May 2019. These expenditures could increase or decrease as a result of
a number of factors, including our financial results, future economic conditions, and our regulatory compliance requirements. At
May 27, 2018, we had commitments for capital expenditures of $158.6 million. In June 2018, we provided notice to Ochoa of our
exercise of a call option to purchase Ochoa’s interest in Lamb Weston BSW. We expect to pay approximately $65 million and
will consummate the transaction as soon as practicable. We believe that cash-on-hand combined with cash flows from operations
will be sufficient to fund these commitments.
Fiscal
2017
Compared
with
Fiscal
2016
Investing activities used $285.3 million of cash in fiscal 2017, compared with $144.3 million in fiscal 2016. The
increase related primarily to our plant capacity expansions at our Boardman, Oregon and Richland, Washington facilities in fiscal
2017. The chopped and formed production line in Boardman, Oregon started up in the third quarter of fiscal 2017.
Financing
Activities
Fiscal
2018
Compared
with
Fiscal
2017
During fiscal 2018, cash used for financing activities totaled $178.9 million, compared with cash used for financing
activities of $142.0 million in fiscal 2017. During fiscal 2018, financing activities primarily related to the payment of $110.2
million in dividends on our common stock, $39.2 million of debt payments, primarily scheduled payments under our term loan
facility, distributions paid to noncontrolling interest of $14.6 million, and $14.4 million of payments related to short-term
borrowings. We had no net transfers to Conagra in fiscal 2018, compared with $38.8 million of net transfers in fiscal 2017.
During fiscal 2017, cash used for financing activities primarily related to the Separation. In fiscal 2017, we issued
$2,341.0 million of debt in connection with the Separation, of which $1,542.9 million of proceeds were distributed directly to
Conagra (including $25.4 million that Conagra used to pay debt issuance costs) and are considered a noncash financing activity
for Lamb Weston. We received $798.1 million of cash proceeds from the debt issuance. We used the $798.1 million of proceeds,
together with borrowings on our revolving credit facility, to fund an $823.5 million cash payment to Conagra on the Separation
Date. We paid $27.4 million of dividends to common stockholders, $12.3 million of debt issuance costs, and $2.8 million of net
short-term borrowings. We made cash distributions to noncontrolling interest of $12.2 million and $23.8 million of debt
repayments in fiscal 2017.
For more information about our debt, including among other items, interest rates, maturity dates, and covenants, see
Note 9, Debt and Financing Obligations, of the Notes to the Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements in “Part
35
Table of Contents
II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K. At May 27, 2018, we were in compliance with the
financial covenant ratios and other covenants contained in the Credit Agreement.
Fiscal
2017
Compared
with
Fiscal
2016
During fiscal 2017, cash used for financing activities totaled $142.0 million, compared with $232.8 million during fiscal
2016. The year-over-year change in financing activities primarily related to the Separation in fiscal 2017, while in fiscal 2016,
cash was primarily used for transfers to Conagra, as we were part of Conagra’s cash management system through the Separation
Date. We had $38.8 million of net transfers to Conagra in fiscal 2017, compared with $236.8 million of net transfers in fiscal
2016.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of May 27, 2018 that are reasonably likely to have a current or
future material effect on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources.
Investments in Joint Ventures
Lamb Weston has interests in certain entities that we have determined to be variable interest entities, but for which we
are not the primary beneficiary. We do not consolidate the financial statements of these entities. For more information about our
investments in joint ventures, see Note 6, Investments in Joint Ventures, of the Notes to the Combined and Consolidated Financial
Statements in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K.
Obligations and Commitments
As part of our ongoing operations, we enter into arrangements that obligate us to make future payments under contracts
such as lease agreements, debt agreements, potato supply agreements, and unconditional purchase obligations (i.e., obligations to
transfer funds in the future for fixed or minimum quantities of goods or services at fixed or minimum prices). The unconditional
purchase obligation arrangements are entered into in the normal course of business in order to ensure adequate levels of sourced
product are available.
36
Table of Contents
A summary of our contractual obligations as of May 27, 2018, were as follows. The expected timing of payments of the
obligations in the table are estimated based on current information. Timing of payments and actual amounts paid may be
different, depending on the time of receipt of goods or services, or changes to agreed-upon amounts for some obligations.
Contractual Obligations
Short-term borrowings
Long-term debt, including current portion, excluding financing
obligations (b)
Interest on long-term debt (c)
Operating leases (d)
Financing obligations (e)
Purchase obligations (f)
Capital commitments (g)
Other long-term liabilities reflected on our Consolidated Balance
Sheet (h):
Compensation and benefits (i)
Other (j)
Total
Payments Due by Period (a)
Total
Less than
1 Year
1-3 Years
3-5 Years
After 5
Years
$
9.6 $
9.6 $
— $
— $
—
2,326.8
685.0
89.3
79.0
466.3
158.6
35.3
105.4
20.7
3.4
81.6
158.6
70.8
206.8
34.2
6.3
96.3
—
535.2 1,685.5
203.4
169.4
16.6
17.8
63.0
6.3
241.1
47.3
—
—
26.9
21.3
$ 3,862.8 $
—
—
414.6 $
8.3
3.8
426.5 $
0.9
4.2
17.7
13.3
781.1 $ 2,240.6
(a) The table assumes amounts included in the “Less than 1 Year” column represent obligations for our fiscal year 2019. The remaining
columns correspond to our fiscal years as follows: “1-3 Years” represents fiscal 2020 and 2021, “3-5 Years” represents fiscal 2022 and
2023, and “After 5 Years” represents fiscal 2024 and thereafter.
(b) The table assumes our long-term debt is held to maturity and includes the current portion of long-term debt. Amounts are reported
gross. Balances have not been reduced by the $30.4 million of unamortized debt issuance costs at May 27, 2018. See Note 9, Debt
Financing Obligations, of the Notes to the Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements
and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K.
(c) Amounts represent estimated future interest payments as of May 27, 2018, assuming our long-term debt is held to maturity and using
interest rates in effect at May 27, 2018. See “Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” of this Form 10-K
for the impact of changes in interest rates on our future cash flows.
(d) We enter into operating leases in the normal course of business. We lease some of our warehouses and operating facilities, as well as
other property and equipment, under operating leases. Some lease agreements provide us with the option to renew the lease or purchase
the leased property. Our operating lease obligations would change if we exercised these renewal options and/or if we entered into
additional operating lease agreements.
(e)
Includes interest payments associated with financing obligations of $30.7 million.
(f) Amount includes open purchase orders and agreements, some of which are not legally binding and/or may be cancellable. Such
agreements are generally settleable in the ordinary course of business in less than one year. Excludes purchase commitments under
potato supply agreements due to uncertainty of pricing and quantity. Potato supply agreements have maximum contracted pricing with
deductions for certain quality attributes, and quantities purchased are determined by the yields produced on contracted acres. Total
purchases under all our potato supply agreements were $595.8 million, $596.1 million, and $571.0 million in fiscal 2018, 2017, and
2016, respectively.
(g) Capital commitments represent commitments for the construction or purchase of property, plant and equipment. They were not
recorded as liabilities on our Combined and Consolidated Balance Sheet as of May 27, 2018, as we had not yet received the related
goods nor taken title to the property.
37
Table of Contents
(h) Long-term deferred income taxes of $92.1 million are excluded from this table, because the timing of their future cash outflows are
uncertain.
(i) Amounts primarily consist of pension, post-retirement obligations, stock-based payment obligations, and deferred compensation plans.
See Note 7, Employee Benefit Plans and Other Post-Retirement Benefits, and Note 10, Stock-based Compensation, of the Notes to the
Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-
K.
(j) Long-term workers compensation of $8.5 million and uncertain tax positions of $13.2 million are excluded from this table because the
timing of their future cash outflows are uncertain. Amount also excludes $14.4 million of a deferred gain as the amount is non-cash.
For the majority of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) granted, the number of shares of common stock issued on the date the RSUs vest is net of
the minimum statutory withholding requirements that we pay in cash to the appropriate taxing authorities on behalf of our employees. The
obligation to pay the relevant taxing authority is excluded from the table above, as the amount is contingent upon continued employment. In
addition, the amount of the obligation is unknown, as it is based in part on the market price of our common stock when the awards vest.
Although we expect to pay approximately $65 million to purchase Ochoa’s interest in Lamb Weston BSW, such amount is excluded from
the table above as it is subject to ongoing negotiations with Ochoa. Once finalized, we expect to consummate the transaction as soon as
practicable.
Reconciliations of Non-GAAP Financial Measures to Reported Amounts
To supplement the financial information included in this report, we have presented Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted
EBITDA including unconsolidated joint ventures and Adjusted Diluted EPS, each of which is considered a non-GAAP financial
measure.
Lamb Weston’s management uses Adjusted EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA including unconsolidated joint ventures and
Adjusted Diluted EPS to evaluate the Company’s performance excluding the impact of certain non-cash charges and other special
items in order to have comparable financial results to analyze changes in our underlying business between reporting periods. The
Company includes these non-GAAP financial measures because management believes they are useful to investors in that they
provide for greater transparency with respect to supplemental information used by management in its financial and operational
decision making. We believe that the presentation of these non-GAAP financial measures, when used in conjunction with GAAP
financial measures, is a useful financial analysis tool that can assist investors in assessing the Company’s operating performance
and underlying prospects. These non-GAAP financial measures should be viewed in addition to, and not as alternatives for,
financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP financial measures may differ from similarly titled
non-GAAP financial measures presented by other companies, and other companies may not define these non-GAAP financial
measures the same way. These measures are not a substitute for their comparable GAAP financial measures, such as net income
(loss) or diluted earnings per share, and there are limitations to using non‑GAAP financial measures.
38
Table of Contents
The following table reconciles net income to Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA including unconsolidated joint
ventures.
Net income attributable to Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
Income attributable to noncontrolling interests
Equity method investment earnings
Interest expense, net
Income tax expense
Income from operations
Depreciation and amortization
Items impacting comparability (a)
Expenses related to the Separation
Non-cash gain on assets
Expense related to actuarial losses in excess of 10% of
related pension liability
Expenses related to SCAE Plan
Expense related to the impairment of a previously idled
production facility
Expense related to the impairment of certain assets
received in connection with the bankruptcy of an onion
products supplier
Gain related to the sale of land received in connection
with the bankruptcy of an onion products supplier
Adjusted EBITDA (b)
Unconsolidated Joint Ventures
Equity method investment earnings
Interest expense, income tax expense, and depreciation and
amortization
included in equity method investment earnings
Items impacting comparability (c)
Gain related to pension plan settlement
Add: EBITDA from unconsolidated joint ventures
$
2018
416.8 $
16.9
(83.6)
108.8
121.2
580.1
138.7
For the Fiscal Years Ended May
2016
2017
2015
326.9 $
13.3
(53.3)
61.2
170.2
518.3
106.6
285.3 $
9.3
(71.7)
5.9
144.5
373.3
95.9
268.3 $
9.3
(42.7)
6.1
140.4
381.4
96.4
8.7
—
—
—
—
26.5
(3.1)
—
—
—
5.3
—
59.5
0.1
—
—
—
—
0.7
—
2014
260.9
9.4
(29.6)
5.3
117.7
363.7
79.2
—
—
3.4
2.1
13.9
—
—
—
—
8.9
—
727.5
—
648.3
—
534.1
—
478.5
(5.1)
466.1
83.6
53.3
71.7
42.7
29.6
30.3
—
113.9
22.5
—
75.8
18.2
(17.7)
72.2
17.6
—
60.3
19.6
—
49.2
Consolidated Joint Ventures
Income attributable to noncontrolling interests
Interest expense, income tax expense, and depreciation and
amortization
included in income attributable to noncontrolling interests
Subtract: EBITDA from consolidated joint ventures
(16.9)
(13.3)
(9.3)
(9.3)
(9.4)
(4.1)
(21.0)
(3.7)
(17.0)
(3.6)
(12.9)
(3.4)
(12.7)
(3.4)
(12.8)
Adjusted EBITDA including unconsolidated joint ventures
$
820.4 $
707.1 $
593.4 $
526.1 $
502.5
(a) Fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016 include $8.7 million, $26.5 million and $5.3 million, respectively, of expenses related to the Separation. In
fiscal 2018, the expenses related primarily to professional fees and other employee-related costs. In fiscal 2017 and 2016, the expenses
related primarily to professional fees.
Fiscal 2017 includes a $3.1 million non-cash gain on assets.
Fiscal 2016 and 2014 include $59.5 million and $3.4 million, respectively, of charges reflecting Lamb Weston’s portion of actuarial
losses in excess of 10% of Conagra’s pension liability for Conagra sponsored plans.
Fiscal 2016, 2015, and 2014 include $0.1 million, $0.7 million, and $2.1 million, respectively, related to costs incurred in connection
with Conagra’s initiative to improve selling, general and administrative effectiveness and efficiencies, which is referred to as the Supply
Chain and Administrative Efficiency Plan (“SCAE Plan”).
39
Table of Contents
Fiscal 2014 includes $13.9 million related to a non-cash impairment of a previously idled small production facility, classified within
selling, general and administrative expenses.
Fiscal 2014 includes $8.9 million related to a non-cash impairment in connection with the impairment of certain assets received in
connection with the bankruptcy of an onion products supplier, classified within selling, general and administrative expenses.
Fiscal 2015 includes a $5.1 million non-cash gain on the sale of land received in connection with the bankruptcy of an onion products
supplier, classified within selling, general and administrative expenses.
(b) Adjusted EBITDA includes EBITDA from consolidated joint ventures.
(c) Fiscal 2016 includes a $17.7 million non-cash gain related to the settlement of a pension plan at our Lamb-Weston/Meijer joint venture.
The following table reconciles diluted earnings per share to Adjusted Diluted EPS:
As reported
Items impacting comparability:
Expenses related to the Separation (b) (e)
Tax reform (c)
Non-cash gain on assets (d) (e)
Total items impacting comparability
Adjusted (f)
For the Fiscal Years Ended May
2017 (a)
2018 (a)
$
$
2.82 $
0.03
(0.19)
—
(0.16)
2.66 $
2.22
0.11
—
(0.01)
0.10
2.32
(a) Diluted weighted average common shares were 147.0 million and 146.6 million for fiscal 2018 and 2017.
(b) Fiscal 2018 and 2017 include $8.7 million of pre-tax expenses ($5.7 million after tax) and $26.5 million of pre-tax expenses ($16.7
million after tax), respectively related to the Separation. In all periods, the expenses related primarily to professional fees and other
employee-related costs.
(c)
Includes a provisional $28.4 million net benefit, comprised of a $39.9 million benefit from the re-measurement of our net U.S. deferred
tax liabilities using the new U.S. federal statutory tax rate, partially offset by an $11.5 million transition tax on our previously untaxed
foreign earnings. We will continue to refine these amounts within the measurement period allowed by Staff Accounting Bulletin
No.118, which will not exceed one year from the enactment date of the Tax Act.
(d) Fiscal 2017 includes a $3.1 million of pre-tax ($2.0 million after tax) non-cash gain on assets.
(e)
Items impacting comparability are tax-effected at the marginal rate based on the applicable tax jurisdiction.
(f) Adjusted Diluted EPS is a non-GAAP financial measure. Management excludes items impacting comparability between periods as it
believes these items are not necessarily reflective of the ongoing operations of Lamb Weston. This non-GAAP measure provides a
means to evaluate the performance of Lamb Weston on an ongoing basis using the same measures that are frequently used by the
Company’s management and assists in providing a meaningful comparison between periods. Any analysis of non-GAAP financial
measures should be done only in conjunction with results presented in accordance with GAAP. The non-GAAP measures are not
intended to be substitutes for GAAP financial measures and should not be used as such.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Company’s
combined and consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these
financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues,
and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis,
40
Table of Contents
we evaluate our estimates, including those related to our trade promotions, goodwill and intangible assets, income taxes, and
allocations made as part of the carve out of Lamb Weston for periods prior to the Separation, among others. We base our
estimates on historical experiences combined with management’s understanding of current facts and circumstances, the results of
which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from
other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Critical accounting estimates are those that are most important to the portrayal of our financial condition and operating
results. These estimates require management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments. We review the development,
selection, and disclosure of our critical accounting estimates with the Audit and Finance Committee of our Board of Directors.
We believe that of our significant accounting policies, the following involve a higher degree of judgment and/or complexity.
Income Taxes
We compute the provision for income taxes using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial reporting and
tax bases of assets and liabilities, and for operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. We measure deferred tax assets and
liabilities using the currently enacted tax rates that apply to taxable income in effect for the years in which those tax assets are
expected to be realized or settled.
Inherent in determining the annual tax rate are judgments regarding business plans, planning opportunities, and
expectations about future outcomes. Management judgments are required for the following items:
· Management reviews deferred tax assets for realizability. Valuation allowances are established when management
believes that it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Changes in
valuation allowances from period to period are included in the tax provision.
· We establish accruals for unrecognized tax benefits when, despite the belief that our tax return positions are fully
supported, we believe that an uncertain tax position does not meet the recognition threshold of ASC 740, “Income
Taxes.” The tax contingency accruals are adjusted in light of changing facts and circumstances, such as the progress of
tax audits, the expiration of the statute of limitations for the relevant taxing authority to examine a tax return, case law
and emerging legislation. While it is difficult to predict the final outcome or timing of resolution for any particular
matter, we believe that the accruals for unrecognized tax benefits at May 27, 2018, reflect the likely outcome of known
tax contingencies as of such date in accordance with accounting for uncertainty in income taxes under ASC 740.
·
As a result of the Tax Act, we recorded provisional estimates for a transition tax on earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries
that have not been taxed previously in the U.S. and the remeasurement of deferred income taxes with a new lower
statutory tax rate. The transition tax is based on our total post-1986 foreign earnings and profits that were previously
deferred from U.S. taxation. We have not yet completed our substantiation of the underlying data and therefore our
taxable base estimates may change. Our estimates of foreign tax credits may also change as we substantiate tax credits
claimed. Further, the transition tax is based in part on the amount of foreign earnings held in cash and other liquid assets.
The transition tax may change as we more precisely calculate amounts held in liquid and illiquid assets at the various
measurement dates. If the final tax outcome of these matters is different than provisional amounts, its impact will be
recorded within the quarter in which the estimate is updated or finalized. Due to the complexities inherent in adopting
the changes, the SEC provided accounting and reporting guidance that allows us to refine the provisional estimates
within a measurement period up to one year from the enactment of the Tax Act. New guidance from regulators,
interpretation of the law, and refinement of our estimates from ongoing analysis of data and tax positions may change
the provisional amounts.
41
Table of Contents
· We recognize the tax impact of including certain foreign earnings in U.S. taxable income as a period cost. We have not
recognized deferred income taxes for local country income and withholding taxes that could be incurred on distributions
of certain non-U.S. earnings or for outside basis differences in our subsidiaries, because we plan to indefinitely reinvest
such earnings and basis differences. Remittances of non-U.S. earnings are based on estimates and judgments of
projected cash flow needs, as well as the working capital and investment requirements of our non-U.S. and U.S.
operations. Material changes in our estimates of cash, working capital, and investment needs in various jurisdictions
could require repatriation of indefinitely reinvested non-U.S. earnings, which could be subject to applicable non-U.S.
income and withholding taxes
While we believe the judgements and estimates discussed above and made by management are appropriate and
reasonable under the circumstances, actual resolution of these matters may differ from recorded estimated amounts. Further
information on income taxes is provided in Note 4, Income Taxes, of the Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements
in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10 K.
Sales Incentives and Trade Promotion Allowances
We promote our products with advertising, consumer incentives, and trade promotions. Sales promotions include, but
are not limited to, discounts, coupons, rebates, and volume-based incentives. The estimates for sales incentives are based
principally on historical sales and coupon utilization and redemption rates, influenced by judgments about current market
conditions such as competitive activity in specific product categories.
Trade promotion programs include introductory marketing funds such as slotting fees, cooperative marketing programs,
temporary price reductions, and other activities conducted by our customers to promote our products. The cost of these programs
are recognized as a reduction to revenue with a corresponding accrued liability based on estimates made at the time of shipment
or coupon release. Estimates made by management in accounting for these costs are based primarily on our historical experience
with marketing programs, with consideration given to current circumstances and industry trends and include the following:
quantity of customer sales, timing of promotional activities, current and past trade-promotion spending patterns, the interpretation
of historical spending trends by customer and category, and forecasted costs for activities within the promotional programs.
The determination of sales incentive and trade promotion costs requires judgment and may change in the future as a
result of changes in customer promotion participation, particularly for new programs related to the introduction of new products.
Final determination of the total cost of promotion is dependent upon customers providing information about proof of performance
and other information related to the promotional event.
Cost Allocations
Prior to the Separation that occurred during fiscal 2017, Conagra provided a variety of services to Lamb Weston, such as
treasury and cash management, procurement, information technology, general accounting and finance, payroll and human
resources, legal and communications, real estate and facilities, and other general and administrative services. To the extent that
costs were not directly attributable to us (direct costs primarily include restructuring charges and employee benefits for Lamb
Weston personnel which include certain stock-based compensation, pension and post-retirement benefits, healthcare and workers’
compensation), Conagra allocated certain selling, general and administrative costs to us based on specific metrics correlated with
the cost of these services (e.g., employee headcount, net sales, square footage of office space, etc.).
The above allocations were consistent with historical allocations for Lamb Weston; however, Conagra did not
historically allocate certain other corporate costs to its various segments. For any remaining indirect corporate costs which
supported Lamb Weston, we were allocated additional selling, general and administrative costs using an equal weighting
42
Table of Contents
between the Lamb Weston product contribution margin (net sales less cost of goods sold and advertising and promotion expenses)
and Lamb Weston total assets relative to consolidated Conagra product contribution margin and total assets.
Although it is not practicable to estimate what such costs would have been if Lamb Weston had operated as a separate
entity, we consider such allocations to have been made on a reasonable basis.
New and Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
For a listing of our new and recently adopted accounting standards, see Note 1, Nature of Operations and Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies, of the Notes to Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements in “Part II, Item 8. Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10‑K.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Our operations are exposed to market risks from adverse changes in commodity prices affecting the cost of raw
materials and energy, foreign currency exchange rates, and interest rates. In the normal course of business, we periodically enter
into derivatives to minimize these risks, but not for trading purposes.
Based on our open commodity contract hedge positions as of May 27, 2018, a hypothetical 10 percent decline in market
prices applied to the fair value of the instruments would result in a charge to “Cost of sales” of approximately $5.3 million ($4.0
million net of income tax benefit). It should be noted that any change in the fair value of the contracts, real or hypothetical, would
be substantially offset by an inverse change in the value of the underlying hedged item.
At May 27, 2018, we had $1,687.5 million of fixed-rate and $648.9 million of variable-rate debt outstanding. We have
interest rate risk associated with our variable-rate debt. A one percent increase in interest rates related to variable-rate debt would
have resulted in an increase in interest expense and a corresponding decrease in income before taxes of approximately $6.6
million annually.
For more information about our market risks, see Note 9, Debt and Financing Obligations, of the Notes to Combined and
Consolidated Financial Statements in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10‑K.
43
Table of Contents
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAY DATA
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Combined and Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the fiscal years ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017 and May
29, 2016
Combined and Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the fiscal years ended May 27, 2018,
May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017
Combined and Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the fiscal years ended May 27, 2018, May 28,
2017, and May 29, 2016
Combined and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and
May 29, 2016
Notes to Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements
45
48
49
50
51
52
53
44
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.:
Opinion
on
the
Combined
and
Consolidated
Financial
Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company)
as of May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017, the related combined and consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income
(loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended May 27, 2018, and the
related notes and financial statement schedule (collectively, the combined and consolidated financial statements). In our opinion,
the combined and consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company
as of May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three year
period ended May 27, 2018, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of May 27, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal
Control – Integrated
Framework
(2013)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and
our report dated July 25, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting.
Basis
for
Opinion
These combined and consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on these combined and consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting
firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S.
federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the combined and consolidated financial statements are free of material
misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material
misstatement of the combined and consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures
that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures
in the combined and consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the combined and consolidated
financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ KPMG LLP
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2016.
Seattle, Washington
July 25, 2018
45
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.:
Opinion
on
Internal
Control
Over
Financial
Reporting
We have audited Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.’s and subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of
May 27, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal
Control
–
Integrated
Framework
(2013)
issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of May 27, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal
Control
–
Integrated
Framework
(2013)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017, the related combined and
consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the fiscal
years in the three-year period ended May 27, 2018, and the related notes and financial statement schedule (collectively, the
combined and consolidated financial statements), and our report dated July 25, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion on those
combined and consolidated financial statements.
Basis
for
Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report
on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be
independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all
material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control
over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition
and
Limitations
of
Internal
Control
Over
Financial
Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that
(1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of
the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
46
Table of Contents
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate
because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Seattle, Washington
July 25, 2018
47
Table of Contents
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
Combined and Consolidated Statements of Earnings
(dollars in millions, except per-share amounts)
For the Fiscal Years Ended May
2017
2018
2016
Net sales
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Income from operations
Interest expense, net
Income before income taxes and equity method earnings
Income tax expense
Equity method investment earnings
Net income
Less: Income attributable to noncontrolling interests
Net income attributable to Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
Earnings per share
Basic
Diluted
Dividends declared per common share
$ 3,423.7 $ 3,168.0 $ 2,993.8
2,332.0
661.8
288.5
373.3
5.9
367.4
144.5
71.7
294.6
9.3
285.3
2,544.2
879.5
299.4
580.1
108.8
471.3
121.2
83.6
433.7
16.9
416.8 $
2,389.2
778.8
260.5
518.3
61.2
457.1
170.2
53.3
340.2
13.3
326.9 $
$
2.83 $
2.82 $
2.22 $
$
$
2.22 $
$ 0.75750 $ 0.37500 $
1.92
1.92
—
See Notes to Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements.
48
Table of Contents
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
Combined and Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(dollars in millions)
Net income
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Reclassification of pension and
post-retirement benefits out of
accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss)
Unrealized pension and post-
retirement benefit obligations
Unrealized currency translation
gains (losses)
Comprehensive income (loss)
Less: Comprehensive income
attributable to noncontrolling interests
Comprehensive income (loss)
attributable to Lamb Weston
2018
Tax
(Expense)
For the Fiscal Years Ended May
2017
Tax
(Expense)
2016
Tax
(Expense)
Pre-Tax
After-Tax
Amount
Amount
Benefit
$ 554.9 $ (121.2) $ 433.7 $ 510.4 $ (170.2) $ 340.2 $ 439.1 $ (144.5) $ 294.6
After-Tax Pre-Tax
Amount
Amount
Pre-Tax
Amount Benefit
After-Tax
Amount
Benefit
0.3
(0.1)
0.2
—
—
—
(5.3)
1.3
(4.0)
(6.0)
1.7
(4.3)
1.6
(0.6)
1.0
7.2
(1.8)
5.4
9.1
558.3
—
(119.6)
9.1
438.7
(1.1)
510.9
—
(170.8)
(1.1)
340.1
(5.5)
435.5
—
(145.0)
(5.5)
290.5
16.9
—
16.9
13.3
—
13.3
9.3
—
9.3
$ 541.4 $ (119.6) $ 421.8 $ 497.6 $ (170.8) $ 326.8 $ 426.2 $ (145.0) $ 281.2
See Notes to Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements.
49
Table of Contents
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(dollars in millions except share data)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $0.6 and $0.5
Inventories
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Total current assets
Property, plant and equipment, net
Goodwill
Intangible assets, net
Equity method investments
Other assets
Total assets
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Short-term borrowings
Current portion of long-term debt and financing obligations
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities
Total current liabilities
Long-term liabilities:
Long-term debt, excluding current portion
Deferred income taxes
Other noncurrent liabilities
Total long-term liabilities
Commitments and contingencies
Redeemable noncontrolling interest
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock of $1.00 par value, 600,000,000 shares authorized; 146,395,866 and
146,087,044 shares issued
Additional distributed capital
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Treasury stock, at cost, 63,534 and 6,143 common shares
Total stockholders' deficit
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
May 27,
2018
May 28,
2017
55.6 $
225.9
549.7
99.2
930.4
1,420.8
135.1
35.4
219.8
11.1
2,752.6 $
9.6 $
38.7
254.4
216.0
518.7
2,336.7
92.1
84.3
2,513.1
57.1
185.2
525.0
90.9
858.2
1,271.2
133.0
37.2
178.6
7.4
2,485.6
22.0
37.9
295.0
200.5
555.4
2,365.0
90.5
71.2
2,526.7
55.6
50.7
146.4
(900.4)
426.4
(4.3)
(2.9)
(334.8)
2,752.6 $
146.1
(904.8)
121.0
(9.3)
(0.2)
(647.2)
2,485.6
$
$
$
$
See Notes to Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements.
50
Table of Contents
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
Combined and Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
(dollars in millions except share data)
Balance at May 31, 2015
Net transactions with parent
Increase in redemption value of
noncontrolling interests in excess of
earnings allocated
Comprehensive income (loss)
Balance at May 29, 2016
Issuance of common stock at Separation
Non-cash debt exchange
Cash distribution to Conagra at Separation
Net transactions with Conagra
Increase in redemption value of
noncontrolling interests in excess of
earnings allocated
Common stock dividends declared
Exercise of stock options, issuance of
other stock awards
Common stock withheld to cover taxes on
vested stock awards
Stock-settled, stock-based compensation
expense after Separation
Other
Comprehensive income (loss)
Balance at May 28, 2017
Increase in redemption value of
noncontrolling interests in excess of
earnings allocated
Common stock dividends declared
Exercise of stock options, issuance of
other stock awards
Common stock withheld to cover taxes on
vested stock awards
Stock-settled, stock-based compensation
expense
Other
Comprehensive income
Balance at May 27, 2018
net of Treasury
Shares
Common Stock, Common Treasury
Stock
Amount Amount
— $
—
— $
—
Stock
Parent
Companies'
Equity
Additional
Paid-in
Accumulated
Other
(Distributed) Retained Comprehensive
Investment
Capital
Earnings
Loss
Total
Equity
— $ 1,362.6 $
—
(233.3)
— $
—
— $
—
(5.1) $ 1,357.5
(233.3)
—
—
—
— $
—
—
— $
146,046,395
—
—
—
146.0
—
—
—
—
—
40,649
(6,143)
—
—
—
—
—
0.1
—
—
—
—
146,080,901 $ 146.1 $
—
—
308,822
(57,391)
—
—
—
—
—
0.3
—
—
—
—
146,332,332 $ 146.4 $
(4.8)
285.3
—
—
— $ 1,409.8 $
—
—
—
—
—
(1,542.9)
(823.5)
806.0
—
—
— $
(146.0)
—
—
(762.0)
—
—
— $
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(0.2)
—
—
—
(0.2) $
—
—
—
(2.7)
(0.5)
—
—
—
—
—
151.1
(1.6)
—
—
(54.8)
0.5
—
4.1
0.2
—
—
—
—
—
175.8
— $
(904.8) $ 121.0 $
—
—
—
—
(2.7)
—
—
(110.8)
1.8
—
—
—
(4.8)
—
281.2
(4.1)
(9.2) $ 1,400.6
—
—
(1,542.9)
—
(823.5)
—
44.0
—
—
—
—
—
(2.1)
(54.8)
0.6
(0.2)
4.1
—
0.2
—
(0.1)
326.8
(9.3) $ (647.2)
—
—
—
—
(2.7)
(110.8)
2.1
(2.7)
—
—
—
(2.9) $
—
—
—
— $
13.5
(8.2)
—
—
(0.6)
416.8
(900.4) $ 426.4 $
13.5
—
(8.8)
—
5.0
421.8
(4.3) $ (334.8)
51
Table of Contents
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
Combined and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(dollars in millions)
For the Fiscal Years Ended May
2017
2016
2018
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization of intangibles and debt issuance costs
Stock-settled, stock-based compensation expense
Earnings of joint ventures in excess of distributions
Deferred income taxes
Pension expense, net of contributions
Other
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivables
Inventories
Income taxes payable/receivable, net
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities
Net cash provided by operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities
Additions to property, plant and equipment
Proceeds from sale of assets
Other
Net cash used for investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds (repayments) of short-term borrowings, net
Proceeds from issuance of debt
Debt repayments
Net transfers to Conagra
Dividends paid
Cash distributions paid to Conagra at Separation
Payments of debt issuance costs
Cash distributions paid to noncontrolling interest
Other
Net cash used for financing activities
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
$
433.7 $
340.2 $
294.6
143.3
13.5
(35.1)
(3.6)
(5.9)
(2.1)
(40.4)
(23.6)
13.7
(15.5)
(8.3)
11.5
481.2 $
(306.8)
2.2
(2.2)
(306.8) $
(14.4)
—
(39.2)
—
(110.2)
—
—
(14.6)
(0.5)
(178.9) $
3.0
(1.5)
57.1
55.6 $
109.1
5.7
(22.3)
14.8
0.1
4.8
1.2
(26.1)
(16.1)
(11.9)
12.1
35.3
446.9 $
(287.4)
2.1
—
(285.3) $
(2.8)
798.1
(23.8)
(38.8)
(27.4)
(823.5)
(12.3)
(12.2)
0.7
(142.0) $
1.1
20.7
36.4
57.1 $
95.9
3.2
(33.8)
20.7
—
(6.5)
(15.1)
(10.7)
—
3.5
7.5
23.0
382.3
(152.3)
8.0
—
(144.3)
21.4
30.0
(39.1)
(236.8)
—
—
—
(8.3)
—
(232.8)
0.6
5.8
30.6
36.4
$
$
$
$
See Notes to Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements.
52
Table of Contents
Notes to Combined an d Consolidated Financial Statements
1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company,” or “Lamb Weston”), along with its joint venture
partners, is a leading global producer, distributor, and marketer of value-added frozen potato products and is headquartered in
Eagle, Idaho. We have four reportable segments: Global, Foodservice, Retail, and Other. See Note 13, Segments, for additional
information on our reportable segments.
On November 9, 2016, Lamb Weston separated from Conagra Brands, Inc. (formerly, ConAgra Foods, Inc., “Conagra”)
and became an independent publicly traded company through the pro rata distribution by Conagra of 100% of the outstanding
common stock of Lamb Weston to Conagra stockholders (“Separation” or “Spinoff”). Each Conagra stockholder of record on
November 1, 2016 (“record date”) received one share of Lamb Weston common stock for every three shares of Conagra common
stock held on the record date. As a result, approximately 146 million shares of Lamb Weston common stock were distributed on
November 9, 2016, to Conagra stockholders. Information related to the Separation and its effect on our financial statements are
discussed throughout these Notes to Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements.
Basis
of
Presentation
These Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements present the financial results of Lamb Weston for the fiscal
years ended May 27, 2018, May 28, 2017, and May 29, 2016 (“fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016”), and have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States of America. The fiscal year end of
Lamb Weston ends the last Sunday in May. The fiscal years for the Combined and Consolidated Financial Statements presented
consist of 52-week periods for fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016.
The financial statements include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) that management
considers necessary for a fair presentation of such financial statements. The preparation of financial statements involves the use of
estimates and accruals. Actual results may vary from those estimates. In addition, the financial statements for periods prior to the
Separation may not reflect what our results of operations would have been had we operated as a separate stand-alone company
and may not be indicative of our future results of operations.
Our combined and consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Lamb Weston and all of its majority-owned
subsidiaries. In addition, the accounts of all variable interest entities for which we are the primary beneficiary are included in our
combined and consolidated financial statements from the date such determination was made. Intercompany investments,
accounts, and transactions have been eliminated.
Certain amounts in the prior period combined financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the current
period presentation.
Prior
to
Separation
Prior to the Separation from Conagra on November 9, 2016 (the “Separation Date”), the combined financial statements
were prepared using the specific accounting records of the entities which comprise the business of Lamb Weston. In some cases,
principally foreign locations, those business activities were contained within entities that were engaged in other business activities
of Conagra. Because a direct ownership relationship did not exist among the various units comprising Lamb Weston, Conagra and
its subsidiaries’ equity investment is shown in lieu of stockholders’ equity in the combined financial statements. Intercompany
investments, accounts, and transactions between the various legal entities comprising Lamb Weston have been eliminated in the
combined and consolidated financial statements.
53
Table of Contents
Prior to the Separation Date, Lamb Weston’s combined and consolidated financial statements included accounts
specifically attributed to Lamb Weston and a portion of Conagra’s shared corporate general and administrative expenses. These
shared services included, but were not limited to, legal, finance, internal audit, financial reporting, income tax accounting and
advisory, insurance, information technology, treasury, and human resources functions. Shared corporate general and
administrative expenses not specifically identifiable to Lamb Weston were allocated to Lamb Weston. The allocations were
determined on a basis which we consider being reasonable reflections of the utilization of services provided by Conagra.
However, these allocations may not reflect the costs and expenses that Lamb Weston would have incurred as a stand-alone public
company. A more detailed discussion of the relationship with Conagra, including a description of the costs which have been
allocated to Lamb Weston and the methods of cost allocation, is included in Note 3, Related Party Transactions.
As further described in Note 3, prior to the Separation Date, Lamb Weston engaged in various intercompany transactions
with Conagra and its affiliates, including the sale and purchase of certain products, the procurement of certain materials and
services, cash transfers related to Conagra’s centralized cash management process and expense allocations. Changes in parent
companies’ equity investment arising from these cash transactions are presented as “Net transfers to Conagra” in financing
activities in the Combined and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, notwithstanding that advances from parent companies
were utilized to fund Lamb Weston’s working capital requirements.
Use
of
Estimates
The preparation of the combined and consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires us to make
certain estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our combined and consolidated financial statements and the
accompanying notes. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including but not limited to those related to provisions for
income taxes, estimates of sales incentives and trade promotion allowances, and the valuation of goodwill and intangible assets.
We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the
circumstances. We adjust such estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstances dictate. As future events and their effects
cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from these estimates. Changes in these estimates will
be reflected in the consolidated financial statements in future periods.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue is recognized when title and risk of loss are transferred to customers upon delivery based on terms of sale and
collectibility is reasonably assured. Revenue is recognized as the net amount to be received after deducting estimated amounts for
discounts, trade allowances, and returns of damaged and out-of-date products.
Shipping
and
Handling
Shipping and handling costs, such as freight to our customers’ destinations, are included in “Cost of sales” in the
Combined and Consolidated Statements of Earnings. When shipping and handling costs are included in the sales price charged for
our products, they are recognized in “Net sales.”
Sales
Incentives
and
Trade
Promotion
Allowances
We promote our products with advertising, consumer incentives, and trade promotions. Sales promotions include, but
are not limited to, discounts, coupons, rebates, and volume-based incentives. The estimates for sales incentives are based
principally on historical sales and coupon utilization and redemption rates, influenced by judgments about current market
conditions such as competitive activity in specific product categories.
Trade promotion programs include introductory marketing funds such as slotting fees, cooperative marketing programs,
temporary price reductions, and other activities conducted by our customers to promote our products. The cost of these programs
are recognized as a reduction to revenue with a corresponding accrued liability based on estimates made
54
Table of Contents
at the time of shipment or coupon release. Estimates of trade promotion liabilities for promotional program costs incurred, but
unpaid, are generally based on estimates of the quantity of customer sales, timing of promotional activities, current and past trade-
promotion spending patterns, the interpretation of historical spending trends by customer and category, and forecasted costs for
activities within the promotional programs. Estimates made by management in accounting for these costs are based primarily on
our historical experience with marketing programs, with consideration given to current circumstances and industry trends.
The determination of sales incentive and trade promotion costs requires judgment and may change in the future as a
result of changes in customer promotion participation, particularly for new programs related to the introduction of new products.
Final determination of the total cost of promotion is dependent upon customers providing information about proof of performance
and other information related to the promotional event.
Advertising
and
Promotion
Advertising and promotion expenses totaled $31.6 million, $22.6 million, and $25.6 million in fiscal 2018, 2017, and
2016, respectively, and are included in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the Combined and Consolidated
Statements of Earnings.
Research
and
Development
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and totaled $13.5 million, $10.6 million, and $6.7 million in
fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively, and are included in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the Combined and
Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
Stock-Based
Compensation
Compensation expense resulting from all stock-based compensation transactions are measured and recorded in the
combined and consolidated financial statements based on the grant date fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued.
Compensation expense is recognized over the period the employee provides service in exchange for the award. See Note 10,
Stock-Based Compensation, for additional information.
Cash
and
Cash
Equivalents
Cash and all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of acquisition,
including short-term time deposits and government agency and corporate obligations, are classified as cash and cash equivalents.
Book overdraft balances, if any, are classified in “Accounts payable” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and are reported as a
component of operating cash flows for accounts payable in our Combined and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as they do
not represent bank overdrafts. Cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates market. Cash and cash equivalents totaled
$55.6 million and $57.1 million at May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017, respectively.
Trade
Accounts
Receivable
and
Allowance
for
Doubtful
Accounts
Trade accounts receivable are stated at the amount we expect to collect based on our past experience, as well as reliance
on the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act, which was enacted to help promote fair trade in the fruit and vegetable industry
by establishing a code of fair business practices. The collectability of our accounts receivable is based upon a combination of
factors. In circumstances where a specific customer is unable to meet its financial obligations (e.g., bankruptcy filings, substantial
downgrading of credit sources), a specific reserve for bad debts is recorded against amounts due to the Company to reduce the net
recorded receivable to the amount that we reasonably believe will be collected. For all other customers, reserves for bad debts are
recognized based on historical collection experience. If collection experience deteriorates, the estimate of the recoverability of
amounts due could be reduced. We periodically review our allowance for doubtful accounts and adjustments to the valuation
allowance are recorded as income or expense. Trade accounts
55
Table of Contents
receivable balances that remain outstanding after we have used reasonable collection efforts are written off through a charge to
the valuation allowance and a credit to accounts receivable. At May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017, the allowance for doubtful
accounts was $0.6 million and $0.5 million, respectively
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (determined using the first-in, first-out method) or net realizable value and
include all costs directly associated with manufacturing products: materials, labor, and manufacturing overhead. The components
of inventories were as follows (dollars in millions):
Raw materials and packaging
Finished goods
Supplies and other
Inventories
Property,
Plant
and
Equipment
May 27,
2018
May 28,
2017
$
$
87.2 $
430.5
32.0
549.7 $
84.5
409.7
30.8
525.0
Property, plant and equipment are recorded at cost. Cost includes expenditures for major improvements and
replacements and the amount of interest cost associated with significant capital additions. The amount of interest capitalized from
construction in progress was $4.2 million, $5.2 million, and $2.7 million in fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Repairs and
maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. The components of property, plant and equipment were as follows (dollars in
millions):
Land and land improvements
Buildings, machinery, and equipment
Furniture, fixtures, office equipment, and other
Construction in progress
Property, plant and equipment, at cost
Less accumulated depreciation
Property, plant and equipment, net
May 27,
2018
May 28,
2017
$
139.8 $
2,212.6
101.0
127.9
2,581.3
(1,160.5)
1,420.8 $
$
139.8
1,917.7
62.6
229.4
2,349.5
(1,078.3)
1,271.2
Depreciation is computed on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective classes of assets as
follows:
Land improvements
Buildings
Machinery and equipment
Furniture, fixtures, office equipment, and other
1-40 years
10-40 years
5-20 years
3-15 years
We recorded $136.3 million, $104.3 million, and $93.9 million of depreciation expense in fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016,
respectively. At May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017, purchases of property, plant and equipment included in accounts payable were
$27.9 million and $60.4 million, respectively.
56
Table of Contents
Long-Lived
Asset
Impairment
We review long-lived assets for impairment upon the occurrence of events or changes in circumstances which indicate
that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable, measured by comparing their net book value to the
undiscounted projected future cash flows generated by their use. Impaired assets are recorded at their estimated fair value.
Goodwill
and
Other
Identifiable
Intangible
Assets
We perform an annual impairment assessment of goodwill at the reporting unit level in the fourth quarter of each year,
or more frequently if indicators of potential impairment exist. The analysis may include both qualitative and quantitative factors
to assess the likelihood of an impairment. The reporting unit’s carrying value used in an impairment test represents the
assignment of various assets and liabilities, excluding certain corporate assets and liabilities, such as cash, and debt.
Qualitative factors include industry and market considerations, overall financial performance, and other relevant events
and factors affecting the reporting unit. Additionally, as part of this assessment, we may perform a quantitative analysis to support
the qualitative factors above by applying sensitivities to assumptions and inputs used in measuring a reporting unit’s fair value.
Our quantitative impairment test considers both the income approach and the market approach to estimate a reporting
unit’s fair value. Significant estimates include market segment growth rates, our assumed market segment share, estimated costs,
and discount rates based on weighted average cost of capital.
We test the reasonableness of the inputs and outcomes of our discounted cash flow analysis against available market
data. During the annual goodwill impairment test performed in the fourth quarter of 2018, we assessed qualitative factors to
determine whether it was more likely than not that the fair value of each reporting unit was less than its carrying value. Based on
the results of the qualitative impairment test, we determined that it was not more likely than not that the carrying value was less
than the fair value of the our Global, Foodservice, Retail, and Other segments.
We amortize acquisition-related intangible assets with finite lives over their estimated useful life. We perform a fourth
quarter, or sooner depending on circumstances, review of significant finite-lived identified intangible assets to determine whether
facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. These reviews can be affected by various
factors, including external factors such as industry and economic trends, and internal factors such as changes in our business
strategy and our forecasts for our products lines.
See Note 5, Goodwill and Other Identifiable Intangible Assets, for additional information.
Fair
Values
of
Financial
Instruments
Unless otherwise specified, Lamb Weston believes the carrying value of financial instruments approximates their fair
value. See Note 11, Fair Value Measurements, for additional information.
Foreign
Currency
Most of our foreign subsidiaries use the local currency of their respective countries as their functional currency. Assets
and liabilities are translated at exchange rates prevailing at the balance sheet dates. Revenues, costs, and expenses are translated
into U.S. dollars using daily exchange rates. Gains and losses resulting from the translation of Consolidated Balance Sheets are
recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
57
Table of Contents
Foreign currency transactions resulted in a gain of $4.7 million in fiscal 2018 and losses of $2.7 million and $2.6 million
in fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively. These amounts were recorded in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the
Combined and Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
Derivative
Financial
Instruments
We use derivatives and other financial instruments to hedge a portion of our commodity risks. We do not hold or issue
derivatives and other financial instruments for trading purposes. Derivative instruments are reported in our Consolidated Balance
Sheets at their fair values, unless the derivative instruments qualify for the normal purchase normal sale exception (“NPNS”)
under GAAP and such exception has been elected. If the NPNS exception is elected, the fair values of such contracts are not
recognized. We do not designate commodity derivatives to achieve hedge accounting treatment.
Income
Taxes
We recognize current tax liabilities and assets based on an estimate of taxes payable or refundable in the current year for
each of the jurisdictions in which we transact business. As part of the determination of our current tax liability, management
exercises considerable judgment in evaluating positions taken in the tax returns. We recognize the effect of income tax positions
only if those positions are more likely than not of being sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest
amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in
which the change in judgment occurs.
We also recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for the estimated future tax effects attributable to temporary
differences (e.g., the difference in book basis versus tax basis of fixed assets resulting from differing depreciation methods). If
appropriate, we recognize valuation allowances to reduce deferred tax assets to amounts that are more likely than not to be
ultimately realized, based on our assessment of estimated future taxable income, including the consideration of available tax
planning strategies.
We have recorded provisional estimates associated with the December 22, 2017 enactment of the U.S. Tax Cuts and
Jobs Act (“Tax Act”), including the accrual for the transition tax and the remeasurement of deferred income taxes. The SEC has
provided accounting and reporting guidance that allows us to report provisional amounts within a measurement period up to one
year of enactment, due to the complexities inherent in adopting the changes. New guidance from regulators, interpretation of the
law, and refinement of our estimates from ongoing analysis of data and tax positions may change the provisional amounts.
New
and
Recently
Issued
Accounting
Standards
Accounting Standards Adopted
In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)
2017-04, Intangibles
-
Goodwill
and
Other
(Topic
350):
Simplifying
the
Test
for
Goodwill
Impairment
. This ASU is intended to
simplify the accounting for goodwill impairment by removing the requirement to perform a hypothetical purchase price
allocation. With the elimination of this step, a goodwill impairment test is performed by comparing the fair value of a reporting
unit to its carrying value. An impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the reporting unit’s carrying value
exceeds its fair value. All other goodwill impairment guidance will remain largely unchanged. This new standard will be applied
prospectively and is effective for annual or interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019.
Early adoption is permitted after January 1, 2017. We elected to adopt this guidance in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 on a
prospective basis. The adoption did not have a material impact on our financial statements.
58
Table of Contents
Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted
In June 2018, the Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) reached a final consensus on EITF Issue No. 17-A: Customer’s
Accounting
for
Implementation,
Setup,
and
Other
Upfront
Costs
(Implementation
Costs)
Incurred
in
a
Cloud
Computing
Arrangement
That
is
Considered
a
Service
Contract
. This guidance provides that implementation costs should be capitalized
using the same model as if the cloud computing arrangement included a software license (ASC 350-40) and should be expensed
over the term of the hosting arrangement, including periods covered by renewal options that are reasonably certain to be
exercised. This guidance is effective for our fiscal 2020 and early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of this
standard to have material impact on our financial statements.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Compensation—Retirement
Benefits
(Topic
715):
Improving
the
Presentation
of
Net
Periodic
Pension
Cost
and
Net
Periodic
Postretirement
Benefit
Cost.
This ASU requires employers to
disaggregate the service cost component from the other components of net benefit cost and report it in the same line item(s) as
other employee compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period. All other non-service components are
required to be separate from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations. These non-service
components are not eligible for capitalization. Changes to the presentation of benefit costs are required to be adopted
retrospectively, while changes to the capitalization of service costs into inventories are required to be adopted prospectively. The
standard permits, as a practical expedient, use of the amounts disclosed in Note 7, Employee Benefit Plans and Other Post-
Retirement Benefits, for the prior comparative periods as the estimation basis for applying the retrospective presentation
requirement. We will adopt the provisions of this guidance in fiscal 2019 (beginning May 28, 2018). The adoption of the amended
standard will not have a significant impact on our financial statements.
In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) Topic 842, Leases, which requires
lessees to reflect most leases on their balance sheet as assets and obligations. We will adopt this standard on May 27, 2019, the
beginning of our fiscal year 2020. The standard is to be applied under the modified retrospective method, unless the FASB ratifies
its proposal to allow a practical expedient to change the date of initial application to the effective date, without adjusting
comparative periods presented. The primary impact upon adoption will be the recognition, on a discounted basis, of our minimum
commitments under noncancelable operating leases as right of use assets and obligations on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. This
will result in a significant increase in assets and liabilities on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. We are currently implementing
process changes in order to comply with the measurement and disclosure requirements.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue
from
Contracts
with
Customers
, which was issued to achieve a
consistent application of revenue recognition within the United States, resulting in a single revenue model to be applied by
reporting companies under U.S. GAAP. Under the new model, recognition of revenue occurs when a customer obtains control of
promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for
those goods or services. In addition, the new standard requires that reporting companies disclose the nature, amount, timing, and
uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. We have completed our assessment and
implemented policies, processes, and controls to support the standards measurement and disclosure requirements. We will
continue to recognize revenue for Lamb Weston branded potato products at the point in time when title and risk of loss transfers
to the customer which is also the point in time when control transfers. The new standard, however, does accelerate the timing of
when revenue is recognized for customer-specific branded (“private label”) potato products. We will adopt the standard using the
modified transition approach by recording the cumulative effect at the date of adoption. Accordingly, approximately $93 million
of revenue and approximately $15 million of net income will be accelerated into years ended prior to May 28, 2018. This will
result in a cumulative adjustment to increase retained earnings by approximately $15 million effective May 28, 2018. We expect
to accelerate about the same amount of revenues and expenses, that would have been recorded in fiscal 2020 using our historical
revenue recognition practices, into fiscal 2019, resulting in a relatively small impact on our fiscal 2019 Consolidated Statement of
Earnings. Our estimates of private label revenues and expenses that will be accelerated into fiscal 2019 under the new standard
are subject to
59
Table of Contents
management’s estimates of future private label sales and could change significantly. Accordingly, we will not know the final net
impact of adopting this standard on our fiscal 2019 results until the end of fiscal 2019.
There were no other accounting standards recently issued that had or are expected to have a material impact on our
financial statements.
2. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share for the periods presented
(dollars and shares in millions):
Numerator:
For the Fiscal Years Ended May
2017
2018
2016
Net income attributable to Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
$
416.8 $
326.9 $
285.3
Less: Increase in redemption value of noncontrolling interests in excess of earnings
allocated
Net income available to Lamb Weston common stockholders
2.7
414.1 $
2.1
324.8 $
4.8
280.5
$
Denominator (a):
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding
Add: Dilutive effect of employee incentive plans (b)
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding
Earnings per share
Basic
Diluted
146.3
0.7
147.0
146.1
0.5
146.6
146.0
—
146.0
$
$
2.83 $
2.82 $
2.22 $
2.22 $
1.92
1.92
(a) For the periods prior to the Separation, earnings per share was calculated based on approximately 146 million shares of Lamb Weston
common stock that were distributed to Conagra stockholders on November 9, 2016.
(b) Potentially dilutive shares of common stock from employee incentive plans are determined by applying the treasury stock method to
the assumed exercise of outstanding stock options and the assumed vesting of outstanding restricted stock units and performance
awards. As of May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017, we did not have any stock-based awards that were antidilutive. Lamb Weston had no
share-based awards outstanding prior to the Separation.
3. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Prior to the Separation, our business was included in the Commercial Foods segment of Conagra. As a result, our
transactions with Conagra were considered related party transactions. In connection with the Separation, we entered into a
separation and distribution agreement, as well as various other agreements that governed our relationships with Conagra
following the Separation, including a transition services agreement, tax matters agreement, employee matters agreement, and
trademark license agreement. Under the transition services agreement, Conagra provided a number of corporate staff services to
us based on direct and indirect costs associated with rendering those services. These services included information technology,
accounting, and human resource services. The fiscal year ended May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017, included $2.4 million and $4.2
million, respectively, of expenses related to the transition services agreement. In April 2018, we concluded our transition services
agreement with Conagra.
Prior to the Separation Date, Conagra allocated certain selling, general and administrative costs to Lamb Weston based
on specific metrics correlated with the cost of services it provided or costs incurred on behalf of the Company (e.g., employee
headcount, net sales, and square footage of office space). Allocations based upon these metrics resulted in
60
Table of Contents
$7.7 million and $53.9 million of selling, general and administrative costs allocated to Lamb Weston in fiscal 2017 and 2016,
respectively. Beginning in fiscal 2017, certain departmental charges, which were previously allocated, were directly absorbed by
Lamb Weston.
The above allocations were consistent with historical allocations for Lamb Weston; however, Conagra did not
historically allocate certain other corporate costs to its various segments. For any remaining indirect corporate costs that
supported Lamb Weston, Conagra allocated additional selling, general and administrative costs using an equal weighting between
Lamb Weston product contribution margin (net sales less cost of sales and advertising and promotion expenses) and Lamb
Weston total assets relative to consolidated Conagra product contribution margin and total assets. Allocations of indirect
corporate costs were $17.3 million and $107.6 million in fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively, of selling, general and administrative
costs. The fiscal 2016 amount includes a $59.5 million charge reflecting an allocation to Lamb Weston of a portion of the
actuarial losses in excess of 10% of Conagra’s pension liability for Conagra’s company sponsored plans. Although it is not
practicable to estimate what such costs would have been if Lamb Weston had operated as a separate public company, Lamb
Weston considers such allocations to have been made on a reasonable basis. The allocations discussed above ceased after the
Separation Date.
The Consolidated Balance Sheet as of May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017 and the fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016 Combined
and Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the periods up to the Separation Date, include only the specific debt and interest
expense of the legal entities that comprise Lamb Weston, and do not include any allocated interest expense or third-party debt of
Conagra.
Included in net sales are sales to Conagra of $8.4 million and $25.7 million for fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively. The
related cost of sales were $3.4 million and $21.4 million, respectively. Lamb Weston also made purchases from Conagra of $7.9
million and $18.5 million in fiscal 2017 and 2016, respectively.
4. INCOME TAXES
For periods ended on or prior to the Separation Date, we were a member of Conagra’s consolidated group and our U.S.
taxable income was included in the consolidated U.S. federal income tax return of Conagra as well as in returns filed by Conagra
with certain state and local taxing jurisdictions. Our foreign income tax returns were filed on a separate company basis. For
periods prior to the Separation Date, our income tax liability was computed and presented herein under the “separate return
method” as if we were a separate tax paying entity.
In connection with the Separation, we entered into a tax matters agreement. Under the tax matters agreement, Conagra is
generally responsible for all taxes associated with consolidated federal and state filings (and will be entitled to all related refunds
of taxes) imposed on Conagra and its subsidiaries (including subsidiaries that were transferred to Lamb Weston at Separation)
with respect to the taxable periods (or portions thereof) ended on or prior to November 9, 2016. Also, pursuant to this agreement,
Lamb Weston is generally responsible for all taxes associated with separately filed foreign, state, and local tax filings (and will be
entitled to all related refunds of taxes) imposed on Lamb Weston and its subsidiaries ended on or prior to November 9, 2016.
Pre-tax income consisted of the following (dollars in millions):
United States
Foreign
Total pre-tax income
For the Fiscal Years Ended May
2017
2018
2016
$
$
478.2 $
76.7
554.9
$
467.5 $
42.9
510.4
$
384.7
54.4
439.1
61
Table of Contents
The provision for income taxes included the following (dollars in millions):
Current
U.S. federal
State and local
Foreign
Total current provision for taxes
Deferred
U.S. federal
State and local
Foreign
Total deferred provision for taxes
Total provision for taxes
For the Fiscal Years Ended May
2017
2018
2016
$
$
$
94.3 $
14.7
15.0
124.0
132.0 $
13.9
9.5
155.4
(4.4)
0.1
1.5
$
(2.8)
121.2 $
9.7
3.2
1.9
$
14.8
170.2 $
100.0
12.0
11.8
123.8
17.6
(1.3)
4.4
20.7
144.5
Income tax expense decreased in fiscal year 2018 predominantly due to the Tax Act enacted in December 2017. Notably,
the Tax Act reduced the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, assessed a one-time transition tax on earnings of non-
U.S. subsidiaries that have not been taxed previously in the U.S., limited the tax deductibility of interest, provided for immediate
deductions for certain new investments instead of deductions for depreciation expense over time, modified or repealed many
business deductions and credits, and created new taxes on certain future foreign sourced earnings.
Income taxes computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory rates to income from operations, including equity method
earnings, and before income taxes are reconciled to the provision for income taxes set forth in the Combined and Consolidated
Statements of Earnings as follows (dollars in millions):
For the Fiscal Years Ended May
2017
2018
2016
Provision computed at U.S. federal statutory rate (a)
Increase (reduction) in rate resulting from:
State and local taxes, net of federal benefit
Tax credits and domestic manufacturers deduction
Effect of taxes on foreign operations
Deferred impact of rate change (b)
Transition tax liability (b)
Other
Total provision for taxes
Effective income tax rate (c)
$
162.6 $
178.6 $
153.7
12.6
(8.1)
(7.0)
(45.4)
11.5
(5.0)
121.2 $
21.8%
11.4
(11.0)
(7.8)
—
—
(1.0)
170.2 $
33.3%
7.1
(9.5)
(2.8)
—
—
(4.0)
144.5
32.9%
$
(a) Since our fiscal year-end is the last Sunday in May, the impact of the lower U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from the Tax Act is
phased in, resulting in a U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 29.3% for fiscal 2018. The U.S. federal statutory tax rate was 35% for both
fiscal 2017 and 2016.
(b)
In connection with the Tax Act, we recorded a $45.4 million net provisional tax benefit from the estimated impact of remeasuring our
net U.S. deferred tax liabilities, including deferred tax benefits originating during the year, with the new lower statutory tax rate.
Excluding the deferred tax benefits originating during fiscal 2018, the net provisional tax benefit was $39.9 million. We also recorded
an $11.5 million transition tax on our previously untaxed foreign earnings that is primarily payable over eight years. As
62
Table of Contents
allowed by Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 118, our provisional estimates will be refined during fiscal 2019 from our ongoing
analysis of data and tax positions along with new guidance from regulators and interpretation of the law which will not exceed one year
from the enactment date of the Tax Act.
(c) The effective income tax rate is calculated as the ratio of income tax expense to pre-tax income, inclusive of equity method investment
earnings.
Income
Taxes
Paid
Income taxes paid, net of refunds, were $106.9 million, $170.0 million, and $124.7 million in fiscal 2018, 2017, and
2016, respectively.
Deferred
Income
Taxes
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and
liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts for income tax purposes. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities
were calculated using the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21% at May 27, 2018 and 35% at May 28, 2017 as follows (dollars in
millions):
Property, plant and equipment
Goodwill and other intangible assets
Compensation and benefit related liabilities
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
Deferred revenue previously recognized for tax
Net operating loss carryforwards (a)
Debt issuance cost
Investment in joint ventures
Other
Less: Valuation allowance (b)
Net deferred taxes (c)
May 27, 2018
May 28, 2017
Assets
Liabilities
Assets
Liabilities
— $
68.0
15.3
16.7
7.2
15.8
—
—
0.7
123.7
(62.0)
61.7 $
127.7 $
—
—
—
—
—
4.6
9.1
12.0
153.4
—
153.4 $
— $
125.0
20.3
22.5
8.2
17.0
—
—
0.9
193.9
(98.4)
95.5 $
159.8
—
—
—
—
—
8.3
12.3
5.1
185.5
—
185.5
$
$
(a) Lamb Weston has approximately $37.2 million of gross ($8.7 million after-tax) foreign net operating loss carryforwards, of which the
majority expire by fiscal 2021. Lamb Weston also has approximately $102.2 million of gross ($7.1 million after-tax) state capital loss
carryovers that will expire in fiscal 2021.
(b) The valuation allowance includes the portion of the net operating loss carryforwards that we are not more likely than not to realize. The
net impact on income tax expense related to changes in the valuation allowance, including net operating loss carryforwards were zero
in fiscal 2018 and $2.8 million of expense in fiscal 2017.
(c) Deferred tax assets of $0.4 million and $0.5 million, as of May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017, respectively, were presented in “Other
assets.” Deferred tax liabilities of $92.1 million and $90.5 million, as of May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017, respectively, were presented
in “Deferred income taxes” as a long-term liability. The deferred tax asset and liability net position is determined by tax jurisdiction.
We have previously asserted an intent to indefinitely reinvest our earnings and other basis differences in operations
outside the U.S., and we have not recognized U.S. deferred income taxes. The Tax Act imposed a transition tax on all of the
Company’s accumulated untaxed non-U.S. earnings. We have not provided additional income taxes for any additional outside
basis differences inherent in our investments in foreign subsidiaries because the investments are essentially permanent in
duration. Determining the amount of unrecognized deferred tax liability related to any remaining
63
Table of Contents
undistributed foreign earnings not subject to the transition tax and additional outside basis difference in these entities (i.e., basis
difference in excess of that subject to the one-time transition tax) is not practicable. We are analyzing the impact of the Tax Act
on our indefinite reinvestment assertion.
.
Uncertain
Tax
Positions
The aggregate changes in the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties consisted of
the following (dollars in millions):
For the Fiscal Years Ended May
2017
2016
2018
Beginning balance
Decreases from positions established during prior fiscal years
Increases from positions established during current and prior fiscal years
Decreases relating to settlements with taxing authorities
Reductions resulting from lapse of applicable statute of limitations
Adjustments resulting from the Separation
Ending balance (a)
$
$
6.9 $
—
7.9
—
(1.6)
—
13.2 $
3.8 $
—
2.2
—
(0.9)
1.8
6.9 $
4.3
(0.5)
0.6
(0.2)
(0.3)
(0.1)
3.8
(a)
If the $13.2 million and $6.9 million of unrecognized tax benefits as of May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017, were recognized in a future
period, it would result in a tax benefit of $11.1 million and $6.2 million, respectively, and a reduction in the effective tax rate. The
ending balance excludes $2.9 million and $2.8 million of gross interest and penalties at May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017, respectively.
Lamb Weston accrues interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions as part of income tax expense.
Lamb Weston conducts business and files tax returns in numerous countries, states, and local jurisdictions. While Lamb
Weston has little history of audits on a standalone basis, Conagra has completed its U.S. federal income tax audit for tax years
through fiscal 2015 and all resulting significant items for fiscal 2015 and prior years have been settled with the U.S. Internal
Revenue Service. Other major jurisdictions where we conduct business generally have statutes of limitations ranging from three
to five years.
Although the timing of the resolutions and/or closures of audits is highly uncertain, it is reasonably possible that certain
U.S. federal and non-U.S. tax audits may be concluded within the next 12 months, which could increase or decrease the balance
of our gross unrecognized tax benefits. The estimated impact on income tax expense and net income is not expected to be
significant.
5. GOODWILL AND OTHER IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The following table presents changes in goodwill balances as allocated to each segment for fiscal years 2018 and 2017
(dollars in millions):
Balance at May 29, 2016
Foreign currency translation adjustment
Balance at May 28, 2017
Foreign currency translation adjustment
Balance at May 27, 2018
Other Total
Global Foodservice Retail
$ 75.7 $
(0.9)
74.8
2.1
42.8 $ 10.9 $
—
42.8
—
42.8 $ 10.9 $
—
10.9
—
4.5 $ 133.9
(0.9)
—
133.0
4.5
—
2.1
4.5 $ 135.1
$ 76.9 $
64
Table of Contents
Other identifiable intangible assets were as follows (dollars in millions):
May 27, 2018
May 28, 2017
Non-amortizing intangible assets (a)
Amortizing intangible assets (b)
Gross
Weighted
Average
Useful Life Carrying Accumulated Useful Life Carrying
(in years) Amount
$
Weighted
Average
(in years) Amount Amortization
—
17.8
17.8
18.0 $
35.2
53.2 $
18.0 $
34.9
52.9 $
n/a
14
n/a
14
Gross
$
$
$
Accumulated
Amortization
—
15.7
15.7
(a) Non-amortizing intangible assets are comprised of brands and trademarks.
(b) Amortizing intangible assets are principally composed of customer relationships, licensing arrangements, and intellectual property.
Amortization expense was $2.4 million, $2.3 million, and $1.9 million in fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.
Total intangible assets, net of amortization, excluding goodwill, as of May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017, were $35.4
million and $37.2 million, respectively. Foreign intangible assets are affected by foreign currency translation. Estimated
intangible asset amortization expense is $1.8 million in each year in fiscal 2019 – 2023, with $8.5 million of amortization
recognized thereafter.
Impairment
Testing
We test goodwill and non-amortizing intangible assets for impairment annually in the fourth quarter or sooner if events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the asset may exceed fair value. Additionally, when we experience
changes to our business or operating environment, we evaluate the remaining useful lives of our finite-lived purchased intangible
assets to determine whether any adjustments to the useful lives are necessary.
During the annual goodwill impairment test performed in the fourth quarter of 2018, we assessed qualitative factors to
determine whether it was more likely than not that the fair value of each reporting unit was less than its carrying value. Based on
the results of the qualitative impairment test, we determined that it was not more likely than not that the carrying value was less
than the fair value of the our Global, Foodservice, Retail, and Other segments. Additionally, we completed our tests of our non-
amortizing intangibles in the fourth quarter and there was no indication of intangible asset impairment.
6. INVESTMENTS IN JOINT VENTURES
Variable
Interest
Entity
-
Consolidated
We hold a 49.99% interest in Lamb Weston BSW, LLC (“Lamb Weston BSW”), a potato processing venture with
Ochoa Ag Unlimited Foods, Inc. (“Ochoa”). We provide all sales and marketing services to Lamb Weston BSW. Under certain
circumstances, we could be required to compensate Ochoa for lost profits resulting from significant production shortfalls.
Commencing on June 1, 2018, or on an earlier date under certain circumstances, we have a contractual right to purchase the
remaining equity interest in Lamb Weston BSW from Ochoa (the “call option”). We are also currently subject to a contractual
obligation to purchase all of Ochoa’s equity investment in Lamb Weston BSW at the option of Ochoa (the “put option”). The
purchase prices under the call option and the put option (collectively, the “options”) are based on the book value of Ochoa’s
equity interest at the date of exercise, as modified by an agreed-upon rate of return for the holding period of the investment
balance. The agreed-upon rate of return varies depending on the circumstances under which the options are exercised. In June
2018, we provided notice to Ochoa to exercise a call option to purchase Ochoa’s interest in Lamb Weston BSW. We expect to
consummate the transaction as soon as practicable.
65
Table of Contents
Our variable interests in Lamb Weston BSW include an equity investment in the venture, the options, certain fees paid to
Lamb Weston by Lamb Weston BSW for sales and marketing services, the contingent obligation related to production shortfalls
and the contingent obligation to fund additional equity contributions or purchase the underlying notes associated with certain
Lamb Weston BSW financings. Our maximum exposure to loss as a result of our involvement with this venture is equal to our
equity investment in the venture, the balance of any promissory notes extended to the venture which are subject to our purchase
obligation, and the amount, if any, by which the put option exercise price exceeds the fair value of the non-controlling interest in
Lamb Weston BSW upon its exercise. Also, in the event of a production shortfall, we could be required to compensate Ochoa for
lost profits. It is not possible to determine the maximum exposure to losses from the potential exercise of the put option or from
potential production shortfalls. However, we do not currently expect to incur material losses resulting from these potential
exposures.
Lamb Weston and Lamb Weston BSW purchase potatoes from a shareholder of Ochoa. The aggregate amounts of such
purchases were $58.7 million, $62.9 million, and $58.6 million in fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Additionally, Lamb
Weston and Lamb Weston BSW utilize storage facilities and water treatment services from a shareholder of Ochoa. The
aggregate amount of such costs were $5.1 million in each of fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016.
Lamb Weston BSW is a variable interest entity, and we have determined that we are the primary beneficiary of the
entity. We consolidate the financial statements of Lamb Weston BSW. The amounts presented for Lamb Weston BSW in the
table below exclude intercompany balances eliminated in consolidation and include the non-controlling interest at redemption
value as reported in our Consolidated Balance Sheets (dollars in millions):
Cash and equivalents
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts (a)
Inventories
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Property, plant and equipment, net
Goodwill
Intangible assets, net
Other noncurrent assets
Total assets
Current portion of long-term debt
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities
Long-term debt, excluding current portion
Total liabilities
Redeemable noncontrolling interest (b)
May 27,
May 28,
2018
2017
$
$
$
$
$
20.5 $
0.2
1.7
0.4
47.9
18.8
3.7
1.0
94.2 $
1.6 $
17.0
2.0
26.4
47.0 $
55.6 $
10.9
0.1
1.9
0.4
49.4
18.8
4.5
—
86.0
1.5
11.6
2.0
28.0
43.1
50.7
(a) As of May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017, the affiliate receivables both were $24.0 million and are not included above as they are
eliminated in consolidation.
(b) Represents the amount that our joint venture partner, Ochoa, had the right to put its equity interest to Lamb Weston on May 27, 2018
and May 28, 2017.
The liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating the Lamb Weston BSW entity do not represent additional claims
on Lamb Weston’s general assets. In connection with the Lamb Weston BSW long-term debt, we have entered into an agreement
with the financial institution which provides that in the event that Lamb Weston BSW fails to comply with certain financial
covenants or repayment terms, we are required to either make certain additional equity contributions to Lamb Weston BSW or to
purchase the underlying notes. The assets recognized as a result of consolidating Lamb Weston BSW are the property of the
venture and are not available to Lamb Weston for any other purpose.
66
Table of Contents
Variable
Interest
Entity
-
Not
Consolidated
We hold a 50% interest in Lamb-Weston/RDO Frozen (“Lamb Weston RDO”), a potato processing venture based in the
United States. We provide all sales and marketing services to Lamb Weston RDO, and we receive a fee for these services based
on a percentage of the net sales of the venture. The fees received were $14.4 million, $13.9 million, and $13.2 million in fiscal
2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. These fees are recorded as a reduction to selling, general and administrative expense. Our
ownership interest in this venture is included in “Equity method investments” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. The balance of
Lamb Weston’s investment was $18.0 million and $17.2 million at May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017, respectively, representing
our maximum exposure to loss as a result of our involvement with this venture. The capital structure of Lamb Weston RDO
includes owners’ equity of $36.0 million and $34.4 million as of May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017, respectively; and term
borrowings from banks of $57.2 million and $59.3 million as of May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017, respectively.
We have determined that Lamb Weston RDO is a variable interest entity, but Lamb Weston is not the primary
beneficiary. Lamb Weston does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic
performance of the joint venture. Accordingly, we do not consolidate the financial statements of this entity. We use equity method
accounting to account for our ownership in Lamb Weston RDO.
Other
Investments
We hold a 50% ownership interest in Lamb-Weston/Meijer v.o.f. (“Lamb-Weston/Meijer”), a joint venture with Meijer
Frozen Foods B.V., which is headquartered in the Netherlands, and manufactures and sells frozen potato products principally in
Europe. We account for this investment using equity method accounting.
Transactions
with
Joint
Ventures
The carrying value of our equity method investments, which include Lamb Weston RDO and Lamb-Weston/Meijer, at
May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017, was $219.8 million and $178.6 million, respectively. These amounts are included in “Equity
method investments” in our Consolidated Balance Sheets. In fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, we had sales to our equity method
investments of $29.3 million, $30.1 million, and $15.0 million and payments to our equity method investments of $10.7 million,
$11.7 million, and $11.9 million, respectively. Total dividends received from our equity method investments were $48.7 million,
$31.0 million, and $37.9 million for fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. As of May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017, we had
receivables from our joint ventures of $12.4 million and $8.4 million, respectively.
67
Table of Contents
Summarized combined financial information for our equity method investments based on 100% of their operations is as
follows:
Net sales
Gross margin
Earnings before income taxes (a)
Current assets
Noncurrent assets
Current liabilities
Noncurrent liabilities
For the Fiscal Years Ended May
2018
$ 1,142.7 $
246.3
167.2
2017
2016
992.6 $
190.9
106.6
917.3
167.0
143.3
$
May 27,
2018
May 28,
2017
376.9 $
362.7
247.5
63.4
325.2
312.5
209.0
71.7
(a) Fiscal 2016 includes a $35.4 million non-cash gain related to the settlement of a pension plan of the Company’s Lamb-Weston/Meijer
joint venture. Our Combined and Consolidated Statements of Earnings reflect our potion of this gain, or $17.7 million.
7. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS AND OTHER POST-RETIREMENT BENEFITS
Lamb Weston has defined pension benefit plans for certain hourly employees. The plans covering these hourly
employees are open to new participants. We also have a plan for retiree health care benefits that is closed to new entrants with
only certain current active participants being eligible for benefits upon retirement and completion of a specified number of years
of creditable service.
We also have a nonqualified defined benefit pension plan that provides unfunded supplemental retirement benefits to
certain executives. This plan is closed to new participants and pension benefit accruals are frozen for active participants.
Other
Plans
Eligible U.S. employees participate in a contributory defined contribution plan (“the Plan”). The Plan permits
participants to make contributions by salary reduction pursuant to Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended. We generally match 100% of the first 6% of the employee’s contribution election and provide an additional 3%
contribution to eligible participants, regardless of employee participation level. The Plan’s matching contributions have a five-
year graded vesting with 20% vesting each year. We made $13.9 million of employer-matching contributions in fiscal 2018 and
$6.0 million in fiscal 2017 after the Separation. Prior to Separation and during fiscal 2016, matching contributions were paid by
Conagra.
We sponsor a deferred compensation savings plan, which is an unfunded nonqualified defined contribution plan. The
plan permits eligible employees to continue to make deferrals and receive company matching contributions when their
contributions to the defined contribution plan are stopped due to limitations under U.S. tax law. With the exception of a $0.5
million Rabbi Trust, participant deferrals and company matching contributions are not invested in separate trusts, but are paid
directly from our general assets at the time benefits become due and payable. At May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017, we had $12.4
million and $8.8 million, respectively, of liabilities attributable to participation in our deferred compensation plan recorded on our
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
68
Table of Contents
Obligations
and
Funded
Status
of
Defined
Benefit
Pension
and
Other
Post-retirement
Benefits
Plans
The funded status of our plans is based on company contributions, benefit payments, the plan asset investment return,
the discount rate used to measure the liability, and expected participant longevity. The following table, which includes only
company-sponsored defined benefit and other post-retirement benefit plans, reconciles the beginning and ending balances of the
projected benefit obligation and the fair value of plan assets. We recognize the unfunded status of these plans on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets, and we recognize changes in funded status in the year changes occur through the Consolidated Statements of
Comprehensive Income (Loss) (dollars in millions):
Change in Benefit Obligation
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
Net transfer from Conagra
Service cost
Interest cost
Participant contributions
Benefits paid
Actuarial (gain) loss
Benefit obligation at fiscal year-end
Accumulated benefit obligation portion of above
Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
Actual return on plan assets
Company contributions
Plan participants contributions
Benefits paid
Fair value of plan assets at end of year
Underfunded status
For the Fiscal Years Ended May
2018
2017
Pension Plans
Post-
Retirement
Plan
Pension Plans
Post-
Retirement
Plan
$
$
$
$
$
$
10.1 $
—
7.8
0.4
—
(0.1)
0.7
18.9 $
18.9
4.5 $
(0.7)
13.6
—
(0.1)
17.3 $
2.5
$
—
—
0.2
0.1
(0.1)
4.3
7.0
$
— $
7.4
4.4
0.1
—
—
(1.8)
10.1 $
$
10.1
— $
—
—
0.1
(0.1)
— $
— $
—
4.5
—
—
4.5 $
—
3.2
—
0.1
—
—
(0.8)
2.5
—
—
—
—
—
—
(1.6) $
(7.0)
$
(5.6) $
(2.5)
Amounts Recognized on Consolidated Balance Sheets
Other noncurrent liabilities
$
(1.6) $
(7.0)
$
(5.6) $
(2.5)
Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income Loss (Pre-tax)
Actuarial (gain) loss
Prior service benefit
Total
$
$
0.7 $
—
0.7 $
3.4
$
—
$
3.4
(1.0) $
—
(1.0) $
(0.4)
(0.2)
(0.6)
69
Table of Contents
Components
of
Net
Periodic
Benefit
Cost
and
Other
Comprehensive
(Income)
Loss
For the period after the Separation Date, the components of net periodic benefit cost were as follows (dollars in
millions):
Service cost
Interest cost
Expected return on plan assets
Net amortization of unrecognized amounts
Prior service benefit
Actuarial gain
Net periodic benefit cost
Changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other
comprehensive (income) loss
Prior service benefit
Actuarial (gain) loss
Amortization of prior service cost
Amortization of actuarial gain (a)
Total recognized in other comprehensive loss (income)
For the Fiscal Years Ended May
2018
2017
Pension Plans
$
7.8 $
0.4
(0.4)
—
—
7.8 $
— $
1.7
—
—
1.7 $
$
$
$
Post-
Retirement
Plan
Pension Plans
Post-
Retirement
Plan
— $
0.2
—
(0.2)
0.5
0.5 $
— $
4.3
0.2
(0.5)
4.0 $
4.4 $
0.1
—
—
—
4.5 $
— $
(1.0)
—
—
(1.0) $
—
0.1
—
—
—
0.1
(0.2)
(0.4)
—
—
(0.6)
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive
loss (income) (pre-tax)
$
9.5 $
4.5 $
3.5 $
(0.5)
(a) Accumulated losses in excess of 10% of the greater of the projected benefit obligation or the market-related value of assets will be
recognized on a straight-line basis over the average remaining service period of active employees in our plans (which is between eight
to 11 for our pension plans and approximately four years for our post-retirement benefit plan), to the extent that losses are not offset by
gains in subsequent years. The estimated net loss and prior service cost that will be amortized from “Accumulated other comprehensive
loss” into net periodic benefit cost in 2019 is $0.7 million ($0.5 million after tax).
Assumptions
The actuarial assumptions used in determining the benefit obligations and net periodic pension cost for our defined
benefit and post-retirement plans are as follows:
Weighted-Average Assumptions Used to Determine
Benefit Obligations:
Discount rate
Weighted-Average Assumptions Used to Determine Net
Periodic Benefit Cost:
Discount rate
Expected return on plan assets
For the Fiscal Years Ended May
2018
2017
Pension Plans
Post-Retirement
Plan
Pension Plans
Post-Retirement
Plan
4.25%
4.18%
4.33%
3.50%
4.33%
7.50%
3.60%
N/A
3.81%
7.50%
3.18%
N/A
70
Table of Contents
Discount
Rate
Assumption.
The discount rate reflects the current rate at which the pension obligations could be settled
on the measurement date: May 27, 2018. The discount rate assumption used to calculate the present value of pension and post-
retirement benefit obligations reflects the rates available on high-quality bonds on May 27, 2018. The bonds included in the
models reflect anticipated investments that would be made to match the expected monthly benefit payments over time. The plans’
projected cash flows were duration-matched to these models to develop an appropriate discount rate. The discount rate we will
use in fiscal 2019 to calculate the net periodic pension benefit and post-retirement benefit cost is 4.25% and 4.18%, respectively.
Asset
Return
Assumption:
Our investment strategies are governed by our Employee Benefit Investments Council. The
expected return on plan assets reflects the expected long-term rates of return for the categories of investments currently held in the
plan as well as anticipated returns for additional contributions made in the future. The expected long-term rate of return is
adjusted when there are fundamental changes in expected returns on the plan investments. The weighted-average expected return
on plan assets we will use in our calculation of fiscal 2019 net period pension benefit cost is 5.3%.
Health
Care
Cost
Trend
Rate
Assumptions.
We review external data and historical trends for health care costs to
determine our healthcare cost trend rate assumptions .
We assumed health care cost trend rates for our post-retirement benefit
plan as follows:
Health care cost trend rate (Pre65/Post65)
Ultimate health care cost trend rate
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate
2018
8.4/6.3%
4.5%
2024
2017
9.0/6.5%
4.5%
2024
A one-percentage point increase in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have an insignificant effect on the
fiscal 2018 and 2017 postretirement benefit obligation.
Investment
Policies
and
Strategies
and
Fair
Value
Measurements
of
Plan
Assets
We utilize professional advisors to oversee pension investments and provide recommendations regarding investment
strategy. Our overall strategy and related apportionments between equity and debt securities may change from time to time based
on market conditions, external economic factors, timing of contributions and the funded status of the plans. The general
investment objective for all of our plan assets is to optimize growth of the pension plan trust assets, while minimizing the risk of
significant losses to enable the plans to satisfy their benefit payment obligations over time. The objectives consider the long-term
nature of the benefit obligations, the liquidity needs of the plans, and the expected risk/return trade-offs of the asset classes in
which the plans may choose to invest.
71
Table of Contents
Investment securities, in general, are exposed to various risks, such as interest rate, credit, and overall market volatility
risk, all of which are subject to change. Due to the level of risk associated with some investment securities, it is reasonably
possible that changes in the values of investment securities will occur in the near term, and such changes could materially affect
the reported amounts.
Cash and cash equivalents
Equity securities:
U.S. equity securities (a)
International equity securities (a)
Fixed income securities:
Government bonds (b)
Total assets
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
May 27, 2018
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Total
$
11.8
$
—
$
—
$
11.8
—
—
3.0
14.8
$
$
1.0
1.5
—
2.5
$
—
—
—
—
$
1.0
1.5
3.0
17.3 (c)
(a)
Includes investments in common/collective trust funds that are valued using net asset values (“NAV”) provided by the administrator of
the funds. The NAV is based on the value of the underlying assets owned by the fund, minus its liabilities, and then divided by the
number of units outstanding. While the underlying assets are actively traded on an exchange, the funds are not. There are currently no
redemption restrictions on these investments. There are certain funds with one-day redeemable notice.
(b)
Includes investments in U.S. Treasury securities based on quoted prices in active markets.
(c) At May 27, 2018, the fair value of our plan assets was $17.3 million, which includes $12.0 million we contributed to the Plan in the
fourth quarter of fiscal 2018, net of benefit payments. The fourth quarter contribution was invested in cash and cash equivalents at May
27, 2018, and invested per the target investment allocation policy after fiscal year-end. The remaining $5.5 million was invested per our
investment policy. In connection with the fourth quarter contribution, we changed our investment policy to invest 30% in equities and
70% in fixed income securities. The asset portfolio was rebalanced in June 2018.
At May 28, 2017, we had $4.5 million of plan assets invested in cash and cash equivalents (Level 1).
Funding
and
Cash
Flows
We make pension plan contributions that are sufficient to fund our actuarially determined costs, generally equal to the
minimum amounts required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. From time to time, we may
make discretionary contributions based on the funded status of the plans, tax deductibility, income from operations, and other
factors. In fiscal 2018, we made $13.6 million of contributions to our qualified plan, which exceeded our minimum contribution
requirements of $1.7 million. In fiscal 2019, our minimum contribution requirements are $0.4 million.
72
Table of Contents
The following are estimated benefit payments to be paid to current plan participants by year (dollars in millions).
Qualified pension benefit payments are paid from plan assets, while nonqualified pension benefit payments are paid by the
Company.
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Succeeding 5 years
Pension
Cost
Financial
Statement
Presentation
$
Pension Plans
Post-Retirement
Plan
$
0.1
0.3
0.5
0.7
0.9
9.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.4
0.4
2.5
Allocated pension costs (benefits) incurred by Conagra prior to the Separation Date and pension costs recognized after
the Separation Date are included in the Combined and Consolidated Statements of Earnings as follows (dollars in millions):
For the Fiscal Years Ended May
2017
2016
2018
Cost of sales (a)
Selling, general and administrative expenses (a)
Total
$
$
7.8 $
—
7.8 $
9.6 $
(5.5)
4.1 $
12.0
53.9
65.9
(a) Pension service costs are allocated to operations as reflected in cost of sales above. Expected returns on pension assets and interest
costs are reflected in “Selling, general and administrative expenses” in the Combined and Consolidated Statements of Earnings. Fiscal
2016 includes $59.5 million of charges reflecting Lamb Weston’s portion of the actuarial losses in excess of 10% of Conagra’s pension
liability for Conagra sponsored plans.
8. ACCRUED LIABILITIES
The components of accrued liabilities were as follows (dollars in millions):
Compensation and benefits
Accrued trade promotions
Dividends payable
Accrued interest
Franchise, property, and sales and use taxes
Income taxes payable
Other
Accrued liabilities
73
May 27,
2018
May 28,
2017
91.7 $
45.4
28.0
10.8
9.6
3.1
27.4
216.0 $
80.1
40.5
27.4
10.2
9.8
4.7
27.8
200.5
$
$
Table of Contents
9. DEBT AND FINANCING OBLIGATIONS
At May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017, our debt, including financing obligations, was as follows (dollars in millions):
Short-term borrowings:
Revolving credit facility
Other credit facilities
Long-term debt:
Term loan facility, due 2021
4.625% senior notes, due 2024
4.875% senior notes, due 2026
Lamb Weston BSW Installment Notes
Financing obligations:
4.35% lease financing obligation due May 2030
Lease financing obligations due on various dates through 2040 (a)
Total debt and financing obligations
Debt issuance costs
Short-term borrowings
Current portion of long-term debt and financing obligations
Long-term debt, excluding current portion
May 27,
2018
May 28,
2017
$
— $
9.6
9.6
632.8
833.0
833.0
28.0
2,326.8
66.8
12.2
79.0
2,415.4
(30.4)
(9.6)
(38.7)
2,336.7 $
$
4.5
17.5
22.0
666.6
833.0
833.0
29.5
2,362.1
68.2
7.7
75.9
2,460.0
(35.1)
(22.0)
(37.9)
2,365.0
(a) The interest rates on our lease financing obligations are due on various dates through 2040 ranging from 2.39% to 5.00% as of May 27,
2018 and 2.00% to 3.32% as of May 28, 2017.
In November 2016, as part of the Separation, Lamb Weston issued $2,341.0 million of debt, which included $1,666.0
million of aggregate principal amount of 4.625% and 4.875% senior notes (together, “Senior Notes”) and $675.0 million of
borrowings under a five-year senior secured credit agreement (“Credit Agreement”) with a syndicate of lenders. The Credit
Agreement consists of a five-year amortizing $675.0 million term loan facility (“Term Loan Facility”) and a five-year non-
amortizing $500.0 million revolving credit facility (“Revolving Credit Facility” and, together with the Term Loan Facility,
“Credit Facilities”). The Credit Agreement is secured by security interests and liens on substantially all of our and each
guarantor’s assets, as long as Lamb Weston remains below investment grade by both Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s. Of the
$1,666.0 million of Senior Notes, $1,542.9 million aggregate principal amount from the Senior Notes were distributed directly to
Conagra, and we used the proceeds of $123.1 million of Senior Notes, together with $700.4 million of borrowings under the
Credit Facilities, to fund an $823.5 million cash payment to Conagra at the time of the Separation. The $1,542.9 million of Senior
Notes distributed directly to Conagra was considered a non-cash financing activity for Lamb Weston.
We currently have the following debt obligations:
·
Revolving
Credit
Facility
: A five-year nonamortizing $500.0 million revolving credit facility with variable annual
interest, under which no borrowings were outstanding on May 27, 2018. In addition to paying interest, we pay an
annual commitment fee for undrawn amounts at a rate of 0.25% to 0.40% depending on our consolidated net
leverage ratio.
74
Table of Contents
·
·
·
·
Term
Loan
Facility
: A five-year $675.0 million term loan amortizing in equal quarterly installments for a total of
5% annually, commencing in March 2017, with the balance payable in November 2021.
4.625%
Senior
Notes
: An eight-year $833.0 million senior debt obligation with fixed annual interest, due
November 1, 2024.
4.875%
Senior
Notes
: A ten-year $833.0 million senior debt obligation with fixed annual interest, due November 1,
2026.
Lamb
Weston
BSW
Installment
Notes
: Includes a $23.0 million fixed rate loan with interest at 4.34% and a $7.0
million variable rate loan with interest at LIBOR plus an applicable margin ranging from 1.90% to 2.30%, payable
in semi-annual installments through June 2031.
Credit
Facilities
Borrowings under the Credit Facilities bear interest at a floating rate per annum based upon the Base Rate or the
Eurocurrency rate, in each case, plus an applicable margin which varies based upon our consolidated net leverage ratio. Margins
range from 0.500% to 1.250% for Base Rate loans and from 1.500% to 2.250% for Eurocurrency rate loans. The Base Rate is
defined as the highest of (a) Bank of America’s prime rate, (b) the federal funds rate plus 0.500%, and (c) the Eurocurrency rate
with a term of one month plus 1.0%.
Upon the occurrence of an event of default, among other things, amounts outstanding under the Credit Agreement may
be accelerated and the commitments may be terminated. Our obligations under the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by certain of
our direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries on the terms set forth in the Credit Agreement. The Credit Agreement has a maturity
date of November 9, 2021.
At May 27, 2018, we had no borrowings outstanding under our Revolving Credit Facility. At May 27, 2018, we had
$496.6 million of availability on our Revolving Credit Facility, which is net of outstanding letters of credit of $3.4 million. For
the period from May 28, 2017 through May 27, 2018, borrowings under our Revolving Credit Facility ranged from a low of zero
dollars to a high of $152.8 million. For the period from May 28, 2017 through May 27, 2018, the weighted average interest rate
for our outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility was 3.31%.
We are required to maintain the following financial covenant ratios under the Credit Agreement:
·
·
Total net leverage ratio of 5.50 to 1.00, decreasing ratably to 4.50 to 1.00 on August 25, 2019 through maturity; and
Interest coverage ratio of 2.75 to 1.00.
Our obligations under the Credit Facilities are guaranteed jointly and severally on a senior secured basis by each of our
existing and future direct or indirect wholly owned domestic restricted subsidiaries, subject to an exclusion of immaterial
subsidiaries.
The Credit Agreement and the indentures governing the Senior Notes contain covenants that, subject to exceptions, limit
our ability and the ability of our subsidiaries to, among other things, incur, assume or guarantee additional indebtedness, pay
distributions on, redeem or repurchase capital stock or redeem or repurchase subordinated debt, make loans and investments,
incur or suffer to exist liens, sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of assets, enter into agreements that restrict distributions or other
payments from restricted subsidiaries to us, engage in transactions with affiliates, designate subsidiaries as unrestricted or
restricted, and consolidate, merge, amalgamate or transfer all or substantially all of our assets.
75
Table of Contents
4.625%
and
4.875%
Senior
Notes
The Senior Notes are senior unsecured obligations and rank equally with all of our present and future senior
indebtedness, senior to all our future subordinated indebtedness and effectively subordinated to all of our present and future
senior secured indebtedness (including all borrowings with respect to the Credit Facilities to the extent of the value of the assets
securing such indebtedness). Interest on the Senior Notes is due semiannually. Upon a change of control (as defined in the
indentures governing the Senior Notes), we must offer to repurchase the Senior Notes at 101% of the principal amount, plus
accrued and unpaid interest.
We may redeem all or a portion of the 4.625% Senior Notes at any time on or after November 1, 2021, at declining
prices starting at 102.313%, plus accrued and unpaid interest. We may redeem all or a portion of the 4.875% Senior Notes at any
time on or after November 1, 2021, at declining prices starting at 102.438%, plus accrued and unpaid interest. Prior to November
1, 2021, we may redeem Senior Notes of either series, in whole at any time or in part, from time to time, at a price equal to 100%
of the principal amount thereof, plus a make-whole premium, plus accrued and unpaid interest. We may also redeem up to 35% of
the aggregate principal amount of either series of Senior Notes on or prior to November 1, 2019 in an aggregate amount equal to
the net proceeds from certain equity offerings at redemption prices equal to 104.625% for the 4.625% Senior Notes and 104.875%
for the 4.875% Senior Notes, plus, in each case, accrued and unpaid interest.
The Senior Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by our domestic subsidiaries that
guarantee our obligations under the Credit Agreement.
Other
The aggregate minimum principal maturities of our long-term debt, including current portion, for the next five fiscal
years and thereafter, are as follows (dollars in millions):
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Thereafter
Debt (a)
Financing
Obligations
$
$
44.9
35.3
35.5
533.4
1.8
1,685.5
2,336.4
$
$
3.4
3.3
3.0
3.1
3.2
63.0
79.0
$
$
Total
48.3
38.6
38.5
536.5
5.0
1,748.5
2,415.4
(a) Debt includes $9.6 million of expected payments on our other credit facilities in 2019.
Conagra paid $25.4 million of costs in connection with the debt issuances described above and we paid $12.3 million.
We amortize the costs in interest expense using the effective interest method over the life of the loans. In fiscal 2018 and fiscal
2017, we recorded $4.6 million and $2.5 million, respectively, of amortization expense in “Interest expense” in our Combined
and Consolidated Statements of Earnings.
During fiscal 2018, we paid $104.0 million of interest on debt. During fiscal 2017, we paid $48.8 million of interest on
debt, after the Separation.
Other
Credit
Facilities
76
Table of Contents
We have $58.0 million of other credit facilities, under which $9.6 million and $17.5 million were outstanding at May 27,
2018 and May 28, 2017, respectively. These facilities consist of an overdraft line, a fixed asset commitment, and a working
capital facility. Borrowings under the facilities bear interest at a percentage of the stated rate, 4.35% at May 27, 2018, and may be
prepaid without penalty. We guarantee the full amount of our subsidiary’s obligations to the financial institution up to the
maximum amount of the credit facility.
Financing
Obligations
During fiscal 2010, we completed the sale of approximately 17,600 acres of farmland to an unrelated buyer and
immediately entered into an agreement with an affiliate of the buyer to lease back the farmland. Lamb Weston’s performance
under the lease was guaranteed by Conagra. Conagra’s guarantee precluded accounting for this transaction as a sale and leaseback
and, accordingly, the $75.0 million of proceeds received were treated as a financing obligation and the land and related equipment
remain on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. At May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017, the remaining balance of the financing
obligation was $66.8 million and $68.2 million, respectively, and the net carrying value of the related property was $39.3 million
and $39.9 million, respectively. The lease agreement has a remaining initial term of two years and two five-year renewal options.
10. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
On October 29, 2016, our Board of Directors adopted the Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. 2016 Stock Plan, which was
amended in July 2017 (“Stock Plan”). Under the Stock Plan, we may grant eligible employees and non-employee directors awards
of stock options, cash, and stock-settled restricted stock units (“RSUs”), restricted stock awards, other awards based on our
common stock, and performance-based long-term incentive awards (“Performance Shares”). At May 27, 2018, we had 10.0
million shares authorized under the Stock Plan, and 7.9 million were available for future grant.
Prior to the Separation Date, Conagra maintained equity incentive plans in which our employees and certain of our non-
employee directors participated. Under these plans, Conagra could grant eligible employees awards of stock options, RSUs,
restricted stock, and other awards based on its common stock, as well as Performance Shares. In addition, certain Lamb Weston
employees participated in Conagra’s employee stock purchase plan, which allowed employees to purchase shares of Conagra
common stock.
In connection with the Separation, outstanding Conagra stock options, RSUs and Performance Shares granted to Lamb
Weston employees and non-employee directors under Conagra’s equity incentive plans were adjusted and converted into Lamb
Weston stock awards under the Stock Plan. The awards were adjusted and converted in a manner intended to preserve the
aggregate intrinsic value of the original Conagra equity award and are subject to substantially the same terms and conditions after
the Separation as the terms and conditions applicable to the original Conagra award prior to the Separation Date.
Stock
Options
We grant options to employees for the purchase of stock at exercise prices equal to the fair market value of the
underlying stock on the date of grant. Options generally become exercisable in three annual installments beginning on the first
anniversary of the grant date and have a maximum term of ten years.
77
Table of Contents
The weighted average Black-Scholes assumptions for stock options granted during fiscal year 2018 were:
Expected volatility (%) (a)
Dividend yield (%)
Risk-free interest rate (%)
Expected life of stock option (years)
23.27
1.71
1.51
4.4
(a) Because our equity shares had been traded for a relatively short period of time when the options were granted, we based our expected
volatility assumptions on the volatility of related industry stocks.
The following table summarizes stock option activity for fiscal 2018 and 2017:
Weighted- Weighted-
Average
Average
Exercise Remaining
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Contractual Value (a)
Term (Years)
(in millions)
Price
(per
share)
Shares
Outstanding at May 29, 2016
Converted on November 9, 2016
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited/cancelled
Outstanding at May 28, 2017
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited/cancelled
Outstanding at May 27, 2018
—
—
607,420 $ 23.60
146,514
(22,896)
(10,211)
35.15
21.90
30.68
720,827 $ 25.90
56,496
(125,717)
—
43.82
17.47
—
651,606 $ 29.08
7.4 $
14.2
7.3 $
23.7
Exercisable at May 27, 2018
424,746 $ 26.29
6.7 $
16.6
(a) The aggregate intrinsic values represent the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between our closing stock price on the last
trading day of our fiscal 2018 fourth quarter, or May 25, 2018, and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money
options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their in-the-money options at the end of
the fiscal year. The amount changes based on the fair market value of our common stock.
RSUs
and
Performance
Shares
We grant RSUs to eligible employees and non-employee directors. The employee RSUs generally vest over a three-year
period while the non-employee director RSUs generally vest after one year. We estimate the fair value of the RSUs based upon
the market price of our common stock at the date of grant. Certain RSU grants do not provide for the payment of dividend
equivalents to the participant during the vesting period. For those grants, the value of the grants is reduced by the net present
value of the foregone dividend equivalent payments.
Performance Shares are granted to certain executives and other key employees with vesting contingent upon meeting
various Company-wide performance goals. Awards actually earned range from 0% to 200% of the targeted number of
Performance Shares for each of the performance periods. Awards, if earned, will be paid in shares of our common stock. Subject
to limited exceptions set forth in the Stock Plan, any shares earned will be distributed at the end of the three-year performance
period. The value of the Performance Shares is adjusted based upon the market price of our common stock at the end of each
reporting period and amortized as compensation expense over the vesting period.
78
Table of Contents
The following table summarizes RSU and Performance Share activity for fiscal 2018 and 2017:
Stock-Settled
Cash-Settled
Performance Shares
Weighted-
Average
Grant-
Date Fair
Value
Shares
Weighted-
Average
Grant-
Date Fair
Shares
Value
Shares
Weighted-
Average
Grant-
Date Fair
Value
Outstanding at May 29, 2016
Converted on November 9, 2016
Granted (a)
Vested (b)
Forfeited/expired/cancelled
Outstanding at May 28, 2017
Granted (a)
Performance condition adjustment (c)
Vested (b)
Forfeited/expired/cancelled
Outstanding at May 27, 2018
$
—
459,466
86,642
(17,753)
(38,751)
489,604
293,209
—
(172,772)
(28,166)
581,875
$
—
25.05
33.96
18.68
24.24
26.92
45.22
—
23.82
31.52
36.84
469,837
—
$
—
(1,503)
(5,722)
462,612
—
—
(173,762)
(3,198)
285,652
$
—
25.33
—
23.70
26.73
25.33
—
—
20.00
27.75
28.54
—
$
56,050
1,640
—
—
57,690
125,524
(818)
(15,228)
(6,898)
160,270
$
—
25.84
25.84
—
—
25.84
43.90
19.70
19.70
43.87
39.82
(a) Granted represents new grants and dividend equivalents accrued.
(b) The aggregate fair value of awards that vested in fiscal 2018 and 2017 was $16.6 million and $0.7 million, respectively, which
represents the market value of our common stock on the date that the RSUs and Performance Shares vested. The number of RSUs and
Performance Shares vested includes shares of common stock that we withheld on behalf of employees to satisfy the minimum statutory
tax withholding requirements. RSUs that are expected to vest are net of estimated future forfeitures.
(c) Amount represents adjustment for performance results attained on Performance Shares during fiscal 2018
Compensation
Expense
Prior to the Separation Date, Conagra charged us for the costs related to the portion of Conagra’s incentive plans in
which Lamb Weston employees participated and an allocation of stock-based compensation costs of certain Conagra employees
who provided general and administrative services on our behalf (see Note 3, Related Party Transactions). Our share-based
compensation expense is recorded in “Selling, general and administrative expenses.” Compensation expense for share-based
awards recognized in the Combined and Consolidated Statements of Earnings, net of forfeitures, was as follows (dollars in
millions):
For the Fiscal Years Ended May
2017
2016
2018
Stock options
Stock-settled RSUs
Performance Shares
Stock-settled compensation expense
Cash-settled RSUs (a)
Total compensation expense
Income tax benefit (b)
Total compensation expense, net of tax benefit
$
$
1.2 $
7.9
4.4
13.5
8.8
22.3
(6.9)
15.4 $
0.6 $
4.0
1.1
5.7
9.7
15.4
(5.7)
9.7 $
0.4
2.4
0.4
3.2
5.7
8.9
(3.3)
5.6
(a) All cash-settled RSUs are marked-to-market and presented within “Accrued liabilities” and “Other noncurrent liabilities” in our
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
79
Table of Contents
(b)
Income tax benefit represents the marginal tax rate.
Based on estimates at May 27, 2018, total unrecognized compensation expense related to stock-based payments was as
follows (dollars in millions):
Unrecognized
Compensation
Remaining
Weighted
Average
Recognition
Stock options
Stock-settled RSUs
Cash-settled RSUs
Performance shares
Total unrecognized compensation expense
11. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
$
$
Expense
Period (in years)
1.1
2.0
1.0
2.1
1.9
0.4
11.4
3.7
9.9
25.4
FASB guidance establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy based upon the assumptions (inputs) used to price assets or
liabilities. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:
Level 1—Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities,
Level 2—Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities
in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets, and
Level 3—Unobservable inputs reflecting our own assumptions and best estimate of what inputs market participants
would use in pricing the asset or liability.
80
Table of Contents
The following table presents our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis based upon the
level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, as of May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017 (dollars in
millions):
Assets:
Pension plan assets
Deferred compensation assets
Derivative assets (a)
Total assets
Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities (a)
Deferred compensation liabilities (b)
Total liabilities
Assets:
Pension plan assets
Deferred compensation assets
Total assets
Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities (a)
Deferred compensation liabilities (b)
Total liabilities
Level 1
As of May 27, 2018
Level 2 Level 3
Total
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
14.8 $
0.5
—
15.3 $
2.5 $
—
0.8
3.3 $
— $
—
— $
1.4 $
12.4
13.8 $
— $
—
—
— $
— $
—
— $
17.3
0.5
0.8
18.6
1.4
12.4
13.8
Level 1
As of May 28, 2017
Level 2 Level 3
Total
4.5 $
0.6
5.1 $
— $
—
— $
— $
—
— $
2.4 $
8.8
11.2 $
— $
—
— $
— $
—
— $
4.5
0.6
5.1
2.4
8.8
11.2
(a) The fair values of our Level 2 derivative assets and liabilities were determined using valuation models that use market observable
inputs including interest rate curves and both forward and spot prices for currencies and commodities. Derivative assets and liabilities
included in Level 2 primarily represent commodity swap and option contracts.
(b) The fair values of our Level 2 deferred compensation liabilities were valued using third-party valuations, which are based on the net
asset values of mutual funds in our retirement plans. While the underlying assets are actively traded on an exchange, the funds are not.
Non-financial assets such as intangible assets, property, plant and equipment are recorded at fair value only if an
impairment is recognized. Cost and equity investments are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis.
At May 27, 2018, we had $1,687.5 million of fixed-rate and $648.9 million of variable-rate debt outstanding. Based on
current market rates, the fair value of our fixed-rate debt at May 27, 2018 was estimated to be $1,658.4 million. Any differences
between the book value and fair value are due to the difference between the period-end market interest rate and the stated rate of
our fixed-rate debt. We estimated the fair value of our fixed-rate debt using quoted market prices (Level 2 inputs) within the fair
value hierarchy that is described above. The fair value of our variable-rate term debt approximates the carrying amount as our
cost of borrowing is variable and approximates current market prices.
12. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
In connection with the Separation, we amended and restated our certificate of incorporation to authorize 600,000,000
shares of common stock and 60,000,000 shares of preferred stock. We had 146,395,866 shares of common stock issued and
outstanding as of May 27, 2018. Each share of common stock entitles the holder to one vote on matters to be voted on by our
stockholders. No preferred stock was issued or outstanding on May 27, 2018.
81
Table of Contents
Dividends
During fiscal 2018 and fiscal 2017, we paid $110.2 million and $27.4 million, respectively, of dividends to common
stockholders. On July 19, 2018, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.19125 per share of common stock. The dividend
will be paid on August 31, 2018, to stockholders of record as of the close of business on August 3, 2018.
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
(Loss)
(“AOCI”)
Comprehensive income includes net income, currency translation adjustments, and changes in prior service cost and net
actuarial gains (losses) from pension and post-retirement plans. We generally deem our foreign investments to be indefinite in
nature and we do not provide for taxes on currency translation adjustments arising from converting the investment denominated in
a foreign currency to the U.S. dollar. If we determine that a foreign investment, as well as undistributed earnings, are no longer
indefinite in nature, estimated taxes are provided for the related deferred tax liability (asset), if any, resulting from currency
translation adjustments.
Changes in AOCI, net of taxes, by component follows (dollars in millions). Amounts in parentheses indicate losses.
Balance as of May 28, 2017
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications, net of tax
Amounts reclassified out of AOCI, net of tax
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)
Balance as of May 27, 2018
$
Foreign
Currency
Translation
Gains (Losses)
$
Pension and
Post-Retirement
Benefits
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
1.0 $
(4.3)
0.2 (a)
(4.1)
(3.1) $
(9.3)
4.8
0.2
5.0
(4.3)
(10.3) $
9.1
—
9.1
(1.2) $
(a) These AOCI components are included in the computation of net pension and postretirement benefit costs. See Note 7, Employee
Benefit Plans and Other Post-Retirement Benefits, for additional information.
13. SEGMENTS
We have four operating segments, each of which is a reportable segment: Global, Foodservice, Retail, and Other. Our
chief operating decision maker receives periodic management reports under this structure that generally focus on the nature and
scope of our customers’ businesses, which enables operating decisions, performance assessment, and resource allocation
decisions at the segment level. The reportable segments are each managed by a general manager and supported by a cross
functional team assigned to support the segment. We measure our segments’ product contribution margin, which
82
Table of Contents
is defined as net sales, less cost of sales and advertising and promotion expenses and excludes general corporate expenses,
interest, and taxes. See “Part I, Item 1. Business” of this Form 10-K for more information on our segments.
(in millions)
Net sales:
Global
Foodservice
Retail
Other
Total net sales
Product contribution margin (a):
Global
Foodservice
Retail
Other
For the Fiscal Years Ended May
2017
2016
2018
$ 1,744.2 $ 1,624.8 $ 1,549.4
946.0
1,030.0
372.1
384.9
126.3
128.3
2,993.8
3,168.0
1,099.1
449.2
131.2
3,423.7
375.7
365.9
87.3
19.0
847.9
267.8
580.1
108.8
121.2
83.6
433.7
16.9
416.8 $
338.6
330.7
77.6
9.3
756.2
237.9
518.3
61.2
170.2
53.3
340.2
13.3
326.9 $
293.2
253.0
69.1
20.9
636.2
262.9
373.3
5.9
144.5
71.7
294.6
9.3
285.3
Total product contribution margin
Other selling, general and administrative expenses (a) (b)
Income from operations
Interest expense, net
Income tax expense (c)
Equity method investment earnings (d)
Net income
Less: Income attributable to noncontrolling interests
Net income attributable to Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
$
(a) Product contribution margin is defined as net sales, less cost of sales and advertising and promotion expenses. Other selling, general
and administrative expenses include all selling, general and administrative expenses other than advertising and promotion expenses.
(b) Fiscal 2018 includes $8.7 million of pre-tax expenses related to the Separation, primarily related to professional fees and employee-
related costs.
Fiscal 2017 includes $26.5 million of pre-tax expenses related to the Separation, primarily related to professional fees, and a
$3.1 million non-cash pre-tax gain on assets received during the period.
Fiscal 2016 includes the following pre-tax charges: $5.3 million of expenses related to the Separation and $59.5 million of non-cash
charges reflecting Lamb Weston’s portion of the actuarial losses in excess of 10% of Conagra’s pension liability for Conagra sponsored
plans.
(c) The Tax Act decreased income tax expense by $64.7 million. This decrease includes a provisional $28.4 million net benefit comprised
of a $39.9 million benefit from the re-measurement of our net U.S. deferred tax liabilities using the new lower U.S. federal statutory tax
rate, partially offset by a $11.5 million transition tax on our previously untaxed foreign earnings, which is primarily payable over eight
years. In addition, the decrease in income tax expense includes a $36.3 million tax benefit related to the lower U.S. corporate tax rate.
We will continue to refine these amounts within the measurement period allowed by SAB No.118, which will not exceed one year from
the enactment date of the Tax Act.
(d) Fiscal 2016 includes a $17.7 million non-cash gain related to the settlement of a pension plan of our Lamb-Weston/Meijer joint
venture.
83
Table of Contents
Assets
by
Segment
The manufacturing assets of Lamb Weston are shared across all reporting segments. Output from these facilities used by
each reporting segment can change from fiscal year to fiscal year. Therefore, it is impracticable to allocate those assets to the
reporting segments, as well as disclose total assets by segment.
Concentrations
Lamb Weston’s largest customer, McDonald’s Corporation, accounted for approximately 11% of consolidated “Net
sales” in each of fiscal 2018, 2017 and 2016. Accounts receivable from another customer accounted for 12% of our consolidated
accounts receivable at May 27, 2018. Accounts receivable from an additional customer accounted for 10% of our consolidated
accounts receivable at May 28, 2017.
Other
Information
The net sales of each of our Global, Foodservice, and Retail reporting segments are comprised of sales of frozen potato
and frozen sweet potato products. The net sales of our Other reporting segment included vegetable sales of $81.7 million, $81.6
million, and $70.4 million, various byproduct sales of $38.1 million, $35.4 million, and $46.4 million, and dairy product sales of
$11.5 million, $11.3 million, and $9.5 million in fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.
Our operations are principally in the United States. With respect to operations outside of the United States, no single
foreign country or geographic region was significant with respect to consolidated operations in fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016.
Foreign net sales, including sales by domestic segments to customers located outside of the United States and Canada, were
$665.8 million, $663.5 million, and $615.9 million in fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively. Lamb Weston’s long-lived assets
of our China operations accounted for less than 4% of our total assets.
Labor
At May 27, 2018, we had approximately 7,200 employees, excluding our joint ventures. Approximately 700 of these
employees work outside of the United States. Approximately 26% of our hourly employees are parties to collective bargaining
agreements on terms that we believe are typical for the industry in which we operate. Most of the union workers at our facilities
are represented under contracts that expire at various times throughout the next several years. Approximately 44% expire in fiscal
2019. As these agreements expire, we believe they will be renegotiated on terms satisfactory to us.
14. COMMITMENTS, CONTINGENCIES, GUARANTEES, AND LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We have financial commitments and obligations that arise in the ordinary course of our business. These include long-
term debt (discussed in Note 9, Debt and Financing Obligations), lease obligations, purchase commitments for goods and
services, and legal proceedings (discussed below).
Capital
Commitments
We had capital commitments of approximately $158.7 million and $81.7 million as of May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017,
respectively, in connection with the expansion and replacement of existing facilities and equipment.
84
Table of Contents
Lease
Obligations
We lease certain facilities, land, and transportation equipment under agreements that expire at various dates. Rent
expense for operating leases was $62.8 million, $63.0 million, and $69.2 million in fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.
The minimum lease payments under non-cancellable operating leases with lease terms in excess of one year are as
follows (dollars in millions):
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Thereafter
Total
Guarantees
and
Indemnifications
$
$
20.7
19.2
15.0
11.6
6.2
16.6
89.3
We provide guarantees, indemnifications, and other assurances to third parties in the normal course of our business.
These include tort indemnifications, environmental assurances, and representations and warranties in commercial agreements. At
May 27, 2018 , we were not aware of any material liabilities arising from any guarantee, indemnification, or financial assurance
we have provided. If the fair value of such liability becomes material, we will accrue for it at that time.
Lamb Weston is a party to various potato purchase supply agreements with partner growers, under which they deliver
their potato crop from the contracted acres to Lamb Weston during the harvest season, and pursuant to the potato supply
agreements, pricing for this inventory is determined after delivery, taking into account crop size and quality, among other
factors. Lamb Weston paid $132.8 million, $150.8 million, and $142.4 million in fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively, under
the terms of the potato supply agreements. Amounts paid are initially recorded in inventory and charged to cost of sales as related
inventories are produced and subsequently sold. Under the terms of these potato supply agreements, Lamb Weston has guaranteed
repayment of short-term bank loans of the potato suppliers, under certain conditions. At May 27, 2018, Lamb Weston has
effectively guaranteed $31.6 million of supplier loans. Lamb Weston has not established a liability for these guarantees, as Lamb
Weston has determined that the likelihood of Lamb Weston’s required performance under the guarantees is remote. Under certain
other potato supply agreements, Lamb Weston makes advances to growers prior to the delivery of potatoes. The aggregate
amounts of these advances were $24.6 million and $24.4 million at May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017, respectively.
Lamb-Weston/Meijer, a joint venture (see Note 6, Investments in Joint Ventures, for further information) headquartered
in the Netherlands, manufactures and sells frozen potato products principally in Europe. Lamb Weston and Lamb Weston’s
partner are jointly and severally liable for all legal liabilities of Lamb-Weston/Meijer. As of May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017, the
total liabilities of Lamb-Weston/Meijer were $242.2 million and $210.0 million, respectively. Lamb-Weston/Meijer is well
capitalized, with partners’ equity of $390.5 million and $320.2 million as of May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017, respectively. Lamb
Weston does not guarantee these obligations and therefore, has not established a liability on its balance sheets for the obligations
of Lamb-Weston/Meijer.
After taking into account liabilities recognized for all of the foregoing matters, management believes the ultimate
resolution of such matters would not have a material adverse effect on Lamb Weston’s financial condition, results of operations,
or cash flows. It is reasonably possible that a change to an estimate of the foregoing matters may occur in the future.
85
Table of Contents
Legal
Proceedings
We are a party to legal actions arising in the ordinary course of our business. These legal actions include commercial
liability claims, premises liability claims, and employment-related claims, among others. As of the date of this filing, we do not
believe that any of the legal actions against us would, either individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. Costs of legal services associated with the foregoing matters are
recognized in earnings as services are provided.
15. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (unaudited; dollars in millions, except per-share amounts and stock price
information)
2018 (a)
Net sales
Gross profit
Income before income taxes and equity method earnings
Income tax expense
Net income attributable to Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
Earnings per share
Basic
Diluted
Dividends declared
Stock price - high (b)
Stock price - low (b)
86
First
Third
Second
Fourth
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
824.6 $
918.2
$
208.2
232.7
112.4
105.8
41.5
28.1
76.6
100.0
863.4 $
242.3
140.7
7.5
156.8
817.5 $
196.3
112.4
44.1
83.4
0.52
0.52
1.07
1.06
0.56
0.56
0.68
0.68
0.1875 0.1875 0.19125 0.19125
47.38
68.03
42.74
54.05
60.32
53.51
54.44
44.88
Table of Contents
Net sales
Gross profit
Income before income taxes and equity method earnings
Income tax expense
Net income attributable to Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
Earnings per share
Basic
Diluted
Dividends declared
Stock price - high (b)
Stock price - low (b)
2017 (a)
First
Third
Second
Fourth
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter
790.7 $
$
832.5
196.5
197.7
118.7
95.9
33.9
41.2
87.2
75.9
776.3 $
179.7
123.5
51.0
79.6
768.5 $
204.9
118.9
44.0
84.2
0.54
0.54
N/A
N/A
N/A
0.59
0.59
N/A
33.02
29.89
0.57
0.57
0.1875
39.90
32.51
0.52
0.51
0.1875
45.66
39.19
(a) The sum of quarterly amounts may not agree to our annual results due to rounding.
The first, second, third, and fourth quarters of fiscal 2018 included $2.2 million ($1.4 million net of taxes), $4.0 million ($2.5 million
net taxes), $1.7 million ($1.2 million net of taxes), and $0.8 million ($0.6 million net of taxes), respectively, of expenses related to the
Separation.
The third and fourth quarters of fiscal 2018 include a $47.0 million and $17.7 million benefit, respectively, related to the Tax Act;
approximately $23.0 million and $13.3 million, respectively, relates to a lower U.S. corporate tax rate and $24.0 million and $4.4
million, respectively, relate to the provisional impacts of the Tax Act.
The first, second, third, and fourth quarters of fiscal 2017 included $9.7 million ($6.1 million net of taxes), $9.0 million ($5.7 million
net of taxes), $5.1 million ($3.2 million net of taxes), and $2.8 million ($1.8 million net of taxes), respectively, of expenses related to
the Separation.
The fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 includes a $3.1 million ($2.0 million net of taxes) non-cash gain on assets.
(b) Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the ticker symbol “LW.” All stock prices are closing
prices as reported by the NYSE.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an
evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as defined in
Rule 13a‑15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”) as of May 27, 2018. Based upon that
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this
report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be
disclosed by us in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the
time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to
87
Table of Contents
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosures.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated any
change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended May 27, 2018 and determined that
there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2018 that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as
defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Our internal control over financial
reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
·
·
·
·
·
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of assets;
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with GAAP;
provide reasonable assurance that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with management
and director authorization;
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or
disposition of assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements; and
provide reasonable assurance as to the detection of fraud.
Our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure
controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control
system, no matter how well-designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s
objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of
controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no
evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control
issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain
assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its
stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of controls to future periods
are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of
compliance with policies or procedures.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of May 27, 2018.
Management based this assessment on criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in Internal
Control
–
Integrated
Framework
(2013)
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
Management’s assessment included evaluation of elements such as the design and operating effectiveness of key financial
reporting controls, process documentation, accounting policies, and our overall control environment. Based on this assessment,
management concluded that, as of May 27, 2018, our internal control over financial reporting
88
Table of Contents
was effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated
financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with GAAP. We reviewed the results of management’s
assessment with the Audit and Finance Committee of our Board of Directors.
Our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, audited the consolidated financial statements prepared
by us. KPMG LLP has also issued an attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting. Their report on the
consolidated financial statements and attestation report are included in “Part II, Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary
Data” of this Form 10-K.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Information required by this Item 10 is included under the headings “Executive Officers” and “Ethics and Governance”
in Part 1, Item 1 of this Form 10-K, and will be included under the headings “Item 1. Election of Directors,” “Corporate
Governance – Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics for Senior Corporate Financial Officers,” “Corporate Governance – Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” and “Board Committees and Membership – Audit and Finance Committee”
in our definitive Proxy Statement for our Annual Meeting of Stockholders scheduled to be held on September 27, 2018 (“2018
Proxy Statement”). This information from the 2018 Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information required by this Item 11 will be included under the headings “Board Committees and Membership –
Compensation Committee,” “Non-Employee Director Compensation,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” and “Executive
Compensation Tables” in our 2018 Proxy Statement. This information is incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K.
89
Table of Contents
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The following table provides information about shares of our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of
options, warrants, and rights under existing equity compensation plans as of our most recent fiscal year ended May 27, 2018.
A
Column
B
C
Number of Securities
Plan Category
Equity compensation plans approved by
securityholders
Equity compensation plans not approved by
securityholders
Total
Number of Securities to
be Issued Upon Exercise
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
of Outstanding Options,
Outstanding
Warrants, and Rights Options, Warrants, and
(a)
Rights (b)
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation
Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column A)
(c)
1,480,812 $
N/A
1,480,812 $
29.08
N/A
29.08
7,944,189
N/A
7,944,189
(a)
Includes outstanding stock options, RSUs and performance shares (assuming the target performance payout level) granted under the
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. 2016 Stock Plan (the “2016 Stock Plan”). Awards granted to Lamb Weston employees prior to the spinoff
were made by Conagra under its stockholder-approved equity plans and were adjusted and converted into Lamb Weston equity awards
under the 2016 Stock Plan in connection with the spinoff. This number also includes shares payable with respect to certain
compensation deferred under the Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan and the Lamb Weston Holdings,
Inc. Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan. The number of securities to be issued excludes options that were exercised but not settled
with our stock transfer agent as of May 27, 2018.
(b) Weighted average exercise price of outstanding stock options only.
(c) Represents shares available for issuance under the 2016 Stock Plan.
Information related to the security ownership of certain beneficial owners, directors and management will be included in
our 2018 Proxy Statement under the heading “Information on Stock Ownership” and is incorporated by reference into this Form
10-K.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Information required by this Item 13 will be included under the headings “Corporate Governance – Director
Independence” and “Corporate Governance – Related Party Transactions” in our 2018 Proxy Statement. This information is
incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Information required by this Item 14 will be included under the heading “Board Committees and Membership – Audit
and Finance Committee” in our 2018 Proxy Statement. This information is incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K.
90
Table of Contents
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
PART IV
a) List of documents filed as part of this report:
1.
Financial Statements
All financial statements of the Company as set forth under Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10‑K.
2.
Financial Statement Schedules
The following consolidated financial statement schedule for fiscal 2018, 2017, and 2016 is included in this report.
Schedule II – Lamb Weston - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts (dollars in millions).
Additions
Charged
to Costs,
Expenses
Deductions
from
and Equity Reserves
Balance
Beginning of
Year
Balance
End of
Year
Year ended May 27, 2018
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance
Year ended May 28, 2017
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance
Year ended May 29, 2016
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance
$
$
$
98.4 $
— $
36.4 (a)$
62.0
12.3 $
86.1 (b)$
— $
98.4
8.9 $
3.4 $
— $
12.3
(a)
(b)
Includes $31.2 million reduction resulting from the revaluation of U.S. deferred tax assets to the new 21% federal statutory tax rate as a
result of the Tax Act.
Includes $83.3 million of additions charged to equity; primarily due to the step-up in tax basis of certain assets in connection with our
Separation from Conagra. See Note 4, Income Taxes, of the Notes to Combined Consolidated Financial Statements in “Part II, Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10 K.
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or not material, not required, or because the required
information is included in the consolidated financial statements or the accompanying notes to financial statements, and therefore,
have been omitted.
91
Table of Contents
b) The following exhibits are filed as part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Form 10‑K:
Exhibit No.
2.1*
3.1
3.2
4.1
4.2
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
Descriptions
Separation and Distribution Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2016, by and between ConAgra Foods, Inc. and
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.’s
Current Report on Form 8‑K filed on November 10, 2016 (File No. 001‑37830)
Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc., incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8‑K filed on November 10,
2016 (File No. 001‑37830)
Amended and Restated Bylaws of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8‑K filed on November 10, 2016 (File No. 001‑37830)
2024 Notes Indenture, dated as of November 9, 2016, by and among Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc., the Guarantors
(as defined therein) and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (including form of note relating to the
2024 Notes), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.’s Current Report on
Form 8‑K filed on November 10, 2016 (File No. 001‑37830)
2026 Notes Indenture, dated as of November 9, 2016, by and among Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc., the Guarantors
(as defined therein) and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (including form of note relating to the
2026 Notes), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.’s Current Report on
Form 8‑K filed on November 10, 2016 (File No. 001‑37830)
Tax Matters Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2016, by and between ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Lamb Weston
Holdings, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.’s Current Report
on Form 8‑K filed on November 10, 2016 (File No. 001‑37830)
Employee Matters Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2016, by and between ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Lamb
Weston Holdings, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.’s Current
Report on Form 8‑K filed on November 10, 2016 (File No. 001‑37830)
Trademark License Agreement, dated as of November 8, 2016, by and between ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Lamb
Weston Holdings, Inc., incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.’s Current
Report on Form 8‑K filed on November 10, 2016 (File No. 001‑37830)
Credit Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2016, by and among Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc., the guarantors party
thereto, the lenders named therein, and Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 10.5 of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8‑K filed on November 10,
2016 (File No. 001‑37830)
Amendment No. 2, dated as of December 1, 2017, to Credit Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2016, among
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc., the guarantors party thereto, the lenders named therein, and Bank of America, N.A.,
as administrative agent, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on January 4, 2018 (File No. 001-37830)
Amended and Restated Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. 2016 Stock Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.2 of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on January 4, 2018 (File No. 001-
37830)**
92
Table of Contents
10.7
10.8
10.9
10.10
10.11
10.12
10.13
10.14
10.15
10.16
10.17
10.18
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. Executive Change of Control Severance Plan, incorporated herein by reference to
Exhibit 10.7 of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on July 25, 2017 (File No. 001-
37830)**
Form of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. Executive Change of Control Severance Plan Participation Agreement,
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
filed on July 25, 2017 (File No. 001-37830)**
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. Voluntary Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
4.3 of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on June 14, 2017 (Commission File
No. 333-218742)**
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
4.4 of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed on June 14, 2017 (Commission File
No. 333-218742)**
Letter Agreement, dated as of August 25, 2016, between ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Micheline C. Carter,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Amendment No. 3 to Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.’s Registration
Statement on Form 10, filed October 5, 2016 (Commission File No. 001‑37830)**
Letter Agreement, dated as of September 15, 2016, between ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Eryk J. Spytek, incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Amendment No. 3 to Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.’s Registration Statement on
Form 10, filed October 5, 2016 (Commission File No. 001‑37830)**
Letter Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2016, between Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. and Robert M. McNutt,
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K
filed on November 17, 2016 (File No. 001-37830)**
Form of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Cash-settled) (pre-March 2017),
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-
Q filed on January 10, 2017 (File No. 001-37830)**
Form of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Stock-settled) (pre-March 2017),
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.13 of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-
Q filed on January 10, 2017 (File No. 001-37830)**
Form of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for Employees (pre-March 2017),
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-
Q filed on January 10, 2017 (File No. 001-37830)**
Form of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Cash-settled) (post-July 2017),
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
filed on July 25, 2017 (File No. 001-37830)**
Form of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (Stock-settled) (post-July 2017),
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.22 of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
filed on July 25, 2017 (File No. 001-37830)**
93
Table of Contents
10.19
10.20
10.21
10.22
12.1
21.1
23.1
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
101.1
Form of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement for Employees (post-March 2017),
incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.23 of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
filed on July 25, 2017 (File No. 001-37830)**
Form of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Non-Employee Directors (pre-
September 2017), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.24 of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed on July 25, 2017 (File No. 001-37830)**
Form of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for Non-Employee Directors (post-
September 2017), incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q filed on January 4, 2018 (File No. 001-37830)**
Form of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. Performance Share Agreement, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
10.4 of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on January 4, 2018 (File No. 001-
37830)**
Statement Regarding Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
Subsidiaries of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
Consent of KPMG LLP
Section 302 Certificate of Chief Executive Officer
Section 302 Certificate of Chief Financial Officer
Section 906 Certificate of Chief Executive Officer
Section 906 Certificate of Chief Financial Officer
The following materials from Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May
27, 2018, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Combined and Consolidated
Statements of Earnings, (ii) the Combined and Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iii) the
Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) the Combined and Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity, (v) the
Combined and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (vi) Notes to Combined and Consolidated Financial
Statements, and (vii) document and entity information.
* Certain exhibits and schedules have been omitted and the Company agrees to furnish supplementally to the SEC a copy of
any omitted exhibits and schedules upon request.
** Management contract or compensatory plan.
94
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
LAMB WESTON HOLDINGS, INC.
LAMB WESTON HOLDINGS, INC.
By:
/s/ ROBERT M. MCNUTT
Robert M. McNutt
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Date: July 25, 2018
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following
persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
Signature
/s/ THOMAS P. WERNER
Thomas P. Werner
/s/ ROBERT M. MCNUTT
Robert M. McNutt
President and Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
Title
Date
July 25, 2018
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ BERNADETTE M. MADARIETA
Bernadette M. Madarieta
Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting
Officer)
/s/ PETER J. BENSEN
Peter J. Bensen
/s/ CHARLES A. BLIXT
Charles A. Blixt
/s/ ANDRE J. HAWAUX
Andre J. Hawaux
/s/ WILLIAM G. JURGENSEN
William G. Jurgensen
/s/ THOMAS P. MAURER
Thomas P. Maurer
/s/ HALA G. MODDELMOG
Hala G. Moddelmog
/s/ ANDREW J. SCHINDLER
Andrew J. Schindler
/s/ MARIA RENNA SHARPE
Maria Renna Sharpe
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
95
July 25, 2018
July 25, 2018
July 25, 2018
July 25, 2018
July 25, 2018
July 25, 2018
July 25, 2018
July 25, 2018
July 25, 2018
July 25, 2018
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
2018
For the Fiscal Years Ended May
2016
2017
2015
Exhibit 12.1
2014
Earnings:
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes and equity method
investment earnings
Add (deduct):
Fixed charges
Distributed income of equity method
investees
Capitalized interest
Earnings available for fixed charges
(a)
Fixed charges:
Interest expense
Capitalized interest
Interest portion of rent expense (1)
Total fixed charges (b)
$
471.3
$
457.1
$
367.4
$
375.3
$
358.4
133.9
48.5
(4.2)
87.4
31.0
(5.2)
31.7
37.9
(2.7)
30.2
12.0
(1.6)
36.0
45.8
(6.0)
649.5
$
570.3
$
434.3
$
415.9
$
434.2
108.8
4.2
20.9
133.9
$
$
61.2
5.2
21.0
87.4
$
$
5.9
2.7
23.1
31.7
$
$
6.1
1.6
22.5
30.2
$
$
5.3
6.0
24.7
36.0
$
$
$
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (a/b)
4.9 x
6.5 x
13.7 x
13.8 x
12.1 x
(1) The interest portion of rent expense represents the estimated interest component of such rent payments.
SUBSIDIARIES OF LAMB WESTON HOLDINGS, INC.
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. is the parent corporation owning, directly or indirectly, 100% of the voting securities (unless
otherwise noted) of the following subsidiaries:
Exhibit 21.1
Subsidiary
Lamb Weston Sales, Inc.
Lamb Weston, Inc.
South Slope Irrigation Association (majority owned by Lamb Weston, Inc.)
Ontario Asset Holdings, LLC
Lamb Weston/Midwest, Inc.
Lamb Weston Japan KK
Lamb Weston (Shanghai) Commercial Company Limited
Lamb Weston International Private Limited
Lamb Weston Holland B.V.
Lamb Weston (Hong Kong) Limited
L Weston Operaciones, S.A. de C.V.
L Weston Mexico, S.A. de C.V.
Tai Mei Agriculture Limited
Lamb Weston Potato (Inner Mongolia) Co., Ltd
Lamb Weston Canada ULC
Lamb Weston International B.V.
Lamb Weston Netherlands B.V.
Lamb Weston (Mauritius) Limited
Lamb Weston (Shanghai) Commercial Company Limited
Jurisdiction of Formation
Delaware
Delaware
Washington
Delaware
Washington
Japan
China
Singapore
Netherlands
Hong Kong
Mexico
Mexico
Hong Kong
China
Canada
Netherlands
Netherlands
Mauritius
China
The corporations listed above are included in the consolidated financial statements of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Exhibit 23.1
The Board of Directors
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.:
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-218742 and 333-214508) on Form S-8 of
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. of our reports dated July 25, 2018, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Lamb Weston
Holdings, Inc. as of May 27, 2018 and May 28, 2017, and the related combined and consolidated statements of earnings,
comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended May
27, 2018, and the related notes and consolidated financial statement schedule (collectively, the “combined and consolidated
financial statements”), and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of May 27, 2018, which reports appear
in the fiscal year ended May 27, 2018 annual report on Form 10-K of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Seattle, Washington
July 25, 2018
I, THOMAS P. WERNER, certify that:
CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Exhibit 31.1
1.
2.
3.
4.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 27, 2018 of Lamb Weston Holdings,
Inc.;
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures
to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
(b)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: July 25, 2018
/s/ THOMAS P. WERNER
THOMAS P. WERNER
Chief Executive Officer
I, ROBERT M. MCNUTT, certify that:
CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Exhibit 31.2
1.
2.
3.
4.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 27, 2018 of Lamb Weston Holdings,
Inc.;
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly
present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures
to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this
report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that
occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the
case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
5.
The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal
control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a)
(b)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.
Date: July 25, 2018
/s/ ROBERT M. MCNUTT
ROBERT M. MCNUTT
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
CERTIFICATION
Exhibit 32.1
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, THOMAS P. WERNER, Chief Executive Officer of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that Lamb Weston
Holdings, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 27, 2018 fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and that the information contained in such Annual Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. as of and for the
periods presented.
July 25, 2018
/s/ THOMAS P. WERNER
THOMAS P. WERNER
Chief Executive Officer
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. and
will be retained by Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
CERTIFICATION
Exhibit 32.2
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
I, ROBERT M. MCNUTT, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc., certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that
Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended May 27, 2018 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and that the information contained in such Annual
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. as
of and for the periods presented.
July 25, 2018
/s/ ROBERT M. MCNUTT
ROBERT M. MCNUTT
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. and
will be retained by Lamb Weston Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.