2018 ANNUAL REPORT
Global Scale, Local Insight
Over 170 years, Lazard has built an unrivaled global network of
relationships with key decision-makers in business, government and
investing institutions. We have deep local roots in business centers
around the world, operating from 43 cities across 27 countries, and
serving clients in more than 70 countries. Our global breadth and
depth is both a competitive advantage and a source of resilience across
market cycles.
Founded
NYSE Listed
Principal Offices
1848
2005
Global Offices
NORTH AMERICA
New York
Boston
Charlotte
Chicago
Houston
Los Angeles
Mexico City
Minneapolis
Montreal
San Francisco
Toronto
CENTRAL AND
SOUTH AMERICA
Bogotá
Buenos Aires
Lima
Panama City
Santiago
São Paulo
EUROPE
London
Paris
Amsterdam
Bordeaux
Brussels
Dublin
Frankfurt
Geneva
Hamburg
Lyon
Madrid
Milan
Nantes
Stockholm
Zürich
ASIA
Beijing
Dubai
Hong Kong
Mumbai
Riyadh
Seoul
Singapore
Tokyo
AUSTRALIA
Melbourne
Perth
Sydney
NEW YORK
SINCE 1851
30 ROCKEFELLER PLAZA
NEW YORK, NY 10112
PARIS
SINCE 1854
121, BOULEVARD HAUSSMANN
75382 PARIS CEDEX 08
LONDON
SINCE 1870
50 STRATTON STREET
LONDON W1J 8LL
Financial Highlights—2018
ANNUAL OPERATING REVENUE
ASSETS UNDER MANAGEMENT(1)
EMPLOYEES
YEARS SERVING CLIENTS
$2.75bn
$215bn
2,900+
170+
OPERATING REVENUE AND
NET INCOME PER DILUTED SHARE, AS ADJUSTED
NET REVENUE BY BUSINESS SEGMENT(2)
($mm, except per share data)
$4.16
$3.78
Financial
Advisory
Asset
Management
54%
46%
$3,000
$2,750
$3.60
$3.20
$2,500
$3.09
$2,250
$2,000
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Operating Revenue
Net Income Per Diluted Share, As Adjusted
NET REVENUE BY GEOGRAPHY
Americas
57%
EMEA
36%
7%
Asia Pacific
($mm, except per share data)
2018
2017
Net Revenue
Operating Revenue
Net Income, As Adjusted
$2,826
$2,755
$539
Net Income Per Diluted Share, As Adjusted
$4.16
Dividend Per Share
$3.03
$2,644
$2,655
$501
$3.78
$2.81
2016
$2,333
$2,344
$410
$3.09
$2.69
2015
$2,354
$2,380
$480
$3.60
$2.35
2014
$2,300
$2,340
$428
$3.20
$1.20
This document uses non-U.S. GAAP measures for operating revenue and net income, as adjusted. Management believes such non-GAAP measures provide a more
meaningful basis for assessing our operating results and comparisons between present, historical and future periods. See Schedule A and related notes for a detailed
explanation of applicable adjustments to corresponding U.S. GAAP measures.
(1) As of February 19, 2019, Assets Under Management was $232 billion
(2) Excludes corporate net revenue
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
(cid:3)
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018
OR
(cid:4)
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
001-32492
(Commission File Number)
LAZARD LTD
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Bermuda
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation
or Organization)
98-0437848
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
Clarendon House
2 Church Street
Hamilton HM11, Bermuda
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant’s telephone number: (441) 295-1422
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Class A Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share
Name of each exchange on which registered
New York Stock Exchange
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes (cid:3) No (cid:4)
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes (cid:4) No (cid:3)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes (cid:3) No (cid:4)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to submit such files). Yes (cid:3) No (cid:4)
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated
by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. (cid:3)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting
company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and
“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer (cid:3)
Non-accelerated filer (cid:4)
Accelerated filer (cid:4)
Smaller reporting company (cid:4)
Emerging growth company (cid:4)
If the Registrant is an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the Registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period
for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. (cid:4)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes (cid:4) No (cid:3)
The aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant as of June 30, 2018 was approximately
$5,784,416,520.
As of January 30, 2019, there were 129,766,091 shares of the Registrant’s Class A common stock outstanding (including 19,763,704
shares held by subsidiaries).
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Registrant’s proxy statement for its 2019 annual general meeting of shareholders are incorporated by reference in this
Form 10-K in response to Part III Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14.
LAZARD LTD
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K
FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018
INDEX
Form 10-K Item Number
PART I
Item 1. Business............................................................................................................................................
Executive Officers of the Registrant ..............................................................................................
Item 1A. Risk Factors......................................................................................................................................
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments ............................................................................................................
Item 2.
Properties..........................................................................................................................................
Item 3. Legal Proceedings ............................................................................................................................
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures...................................................................................................................
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases
of Equity Securities .....................................................................................................................
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data ....................................................................................................................
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ..........
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk .........................................................
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data ................................................................................
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure ..........
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures...................................................................................................................
Item 9B. Other Information.............................................................................................................................
PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance...............................................................
Item 11. Executive Compensation..................................................................................................................
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Stockholder Matters ....................................................................................................................
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence ...............................
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services ..........................................................................................
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules ...................................................................................
Index to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule Items 15(a)(1) and 15(a)(2) ......
SIGNATURES ..................................................................................................................................................
Page
No.
1
12
13
29
30
30
30
31
33
36
68
69
130
130
131
132
132
132
133
133
134
F-1
II-1
i
Part I
When we use the terms “Lazard”, “we”, “us”, “our” and “the Company”, we mean Lazard Ltd, a company
incorporated under the laws of Bermuda, and its subsidiaries, including Lazard Group LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company (“Lazard Group”), that is the current holding company for our businesses. Lazard Ltd’s primary
operating asset is its indirect ownership as of December 31, 2018 of all of the common membership interests in
Lazard Group and its controlling interest in Lazard Group.
Item 1.
Business
Lazard is one of the world’s preeminent financial advisory and asset management firms. We have long
specialized in crafting solutions to the complex financial and strategic challenges of a diverse set of clients around
the world, including corporations, governments, institutions, partnerships and individuals. Founded in 1848 in New
Orleans, we currently operate from 43 cities in key business and financial centers across 27 countries throughout
North America, Europe, Asia, Australia, the Middle East, and Central and South America.
Principal Business Lines
We focus primarily on two business segments: Financial Advisory and Asset Management. We believe that
the mix of our activities across business segments, geographic regions, industries and investment strategies helps to
diversify and stabilize our revenue stream.
Financial Advisory
Our Financial Advisory business offers corporate, partnership, institutional, government, sovereign and
individual clients across the globe a wide array of financial advisory services regarding mergers and acquisitions
(“M&A”) and other strategic matters, restructurings, capital structure, shareholder advisory, capital raising and
various other financial matters. We focus on solving our clients’ most complex issues, providing advice to key
decision-makers, senior management, boards of directors and business owners, as well as governments and
governmental agencies, in transactions that typically are of significant strategic and financial importance to them.
We continue to build our Financial Advisory business by fostering long-term, senior level relationships with
existing and new clients as their independent advisor on strategic transactions and other matters. We seek to build
and sustain long-term relationships with our clients rather than focusing simply on individual transactions, a practice
that we believe enhances our access to senior management of major corporations and institutions around the world.
We emphasize providing clients with senior level focus during all phases of transaction analysis and execution.
While we strive to earn repeat business from our clients, we operate in a highly competitive environment in
which there are no long-term contracted sources of revenue. Each revenue-generating engagement is separately
negotiated and awarded. To develop new client relationships, and to develop new engagements from historical client
relationships, we maintain an active dialogue with a large number of clients and potential clients, as well as with
their financial and legal advisors, on an ongoing basis. We have gained a significant number of new clients each
year through our business development initiatives, through recruiting additional senior investment banking
professionals who bring with them client relationships and through referrals from directors, attorneys and other third
parties with whom we have relationships. At the same time, we lose clients each year as a result of the sale or
merger of a client, a change in a client’s senior management, competition from other investment banks and other
causes.
We earned $1 million or more from 287 clients, 304 clients and 276 clients for the years ended December 31,
2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, the ten largest fee
paying clients constituted approximately 19%, 22% and 23%, respectively, of our Financial Advisory segment net
revenue, with no client individually contributing more than 10% of segment net revenue during any of these years.
We believe that we have been pioneers in offering financial advisory services on an international basis, with
the establishment of our New York, Paris and London offices dating back to the nineteenth century. We maintain a
1
major local presence in the United States (the “U.S.”), the United Kingdom (the “U.K.”) and France, including a
network of regional branch offices in the U.S., as well as a presence in Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil,
Canada, Chile, China, Colombia, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Italy, Japan, Mexico, the Netherlands, Panama, Peru,
Singapore, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the Middle East region.
In addition to seeking business centered in the regions described above, we historically have focused in
particular on advising clients with respect to cross-border transactions. We believe that we are particularly well
known for our legacy of offering broad teams of professionals who are indigenous to their respective regions, who
have long-term client relationships, capabilities and know-how in their respective regions, and who will coordinate
with our professionals who have global sector expertise. We also believe that this positioning affords us insight
around the globe into key industry, economic, governmental and regulatory issues and developments, which we can
bring to bear on behalf of our clients.
Our Financial Advisory business has made certain business acquisitions and entered into other strategic
business relationships. For example, in 2016, we expanded our North American Financial Advisory business
through the acquisition of an independent financial advisory firm based in Canada, and we acquired the portion of
MBA Lazard that we did not previously own, thereby fully integrating our Latin American operations.
Services Offered
We advise clients on a wide range of strategic and financial issues. When we advise clients on the potential
acquisition of another company, business or certain assets, our services include evaluating potential acquisition
targets, providing valuation analyses, evaluating and proposing financial and structural alternatives, and rendering, if
appropriate, fairness opinions. We also may advise as to the timing, financing and pricing of a proposed acquisition
and assist in negotiating and closing the acquisition. In addition, we may assist in executing an acquisition by acting
as a dealer-manager in transactions structured as a tender or exchange offer.
When we advise clients that are contemplating the sale of certain businesses, assets or an entire company, our
services include advising on the sale process for the situation, providing valuation analyses, assisting in preparing an
information memorandum or other appropriate sale materials and rendering, if appropriate, fairness opinions. We
also identify and contact selected qualified acquirors and assist in negotiating and closing the proposed sale. As
appropriate, we also advise our clients regarding potential financial and strategic alternatives to a sale, including
recapitalizations, spin-offs, carve-outs and split-offs. We frequently provide advice with respect to the structure,
timing and pricing of these alternatives.
For companies in financial distress, our services may include reviewing and analyzing the business,
operations, properties, financial condition and prospects of the company, evaluating debt capacity, assisting in the
determination of an appropriate capital structure and evaluating financial and strategic alternatives. If appropriate,
we may provide financial advice and assistance in developing and seeking approval of a restructuring or
reorganization plan, which may include a plan of reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code or
other similar court administered processes in non-U.S. jurisdictions. In such cases, we may assist in certain aspects
of the implementation of such a plan, including advising and assisting in structuring and effecting the financial
aspects of a sale or recapitalization, structuring new securities, exchange offers, other consideration or other
inducements to be offered or issued, as well as assisting and participating in negotiations with affected entities or
groups.
When we assist clients in connection with shareholder advisory and corporate preparedness matters, our
services may include reviewing and analyzing the business and financial condition of the company, providing
insights on the company’s shareholders, assisting in the evaluation of corporate governance matters, and advising on
defense measures and strategic alternatives potentially available to the company. Our advice may relate to a broad
range of matters including M&A, capital markets, corporate governance and data analytics.
When we assist clients in connection with their capital structure, we typically review and analyze structural
alternatives, assist in long-term capital planning and advise and assist with respect to rating agency discussions and
relationships, among other things.
2
When we assist clients in raising private or public market financing or capital, our services include assisting
clients in connection with securing, refinancing or restructuring bank loans or other debt, originating and executing,
or participating in, public underwritings and private placements of securities, and originating and executing private
placements of partnership and similar interests in alternative investment funds such as leveraged buyout, mezzanine
or real estate focused funds.
We are at the forefront of providing independent advice to governments and governmental agencies in
connection with economic developments. Lazard’s Sovereign Advisory Group has advised a number of countries
and institutions with respect to sovereign debt and other financial matters.
Staffing
We staff each of our assignments with a team of quality professionals who have appropriate product, industry
and geographic expertise. We pride ourselves on, and we believe we differentiate ourselves from our competitors by,
being able to offer a high level of attention from senior personnel to our clients and organizing ourselves in such a
way that managing directors who are responsible for securing and maintaining client relationships also actively
participate in providing related advice and services. Our managing directors have significant experience, and many
of them are able to use this experience to advise on M&A, financings, restructurings, capital structure, shareholder
advisory and other transactions or financial matters, depending on our clients’ needs. Many of our managing
directors and senior employees come from diverse backgrounds, such as senior leadership positions in corporations,
government, law and strategic consulting, which we believe enhances our ability to offer sophisticated advice and
customized solutions to our clients. As of December 31, 2018, our Financial Advisory segment had 166 managing
directors and 1,312 other professionals and support staff.
Industries Served
We seek to offer our services across most major industry groups, including, in many cases, sub-industry
specialties. Managing directors and professionals in our Mergers and Acquisitions practice are organized to provide
advice in the following major industry practice areas:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
consumer;
financial institutions;
health care and life sciences;
industrials;
power and energy/infrastructure;
real estate; and
technology, media and telecommunications.
These groups are managed locally in each relevant geographic region and are coordinated globally, which
allows us to bring local industry-specific knowledge to bear on behalf of our clients on a global basis. We believe
that this enhances the scope and the quality of the advice that we can offer, which improves our ability to market our
capabilities to clients.
In addition to our Mergers and Acquisitions and Restructuring practices, we also maintain specialties in the
following distinct practice areas within our Financial Advisory business:
•
•
•
•
government and sovereign advisory;
capital structure and debt advisory;
shareholder and corporate preparedness advisory;
fund-raising for alternative investment funds; and
3
•
corporate finance and other services, including private placements, underwritten offerings related to our
Financial Advisory business and transactions involving the exchange or issuance of securities.
We endeavor to coordinate the activities of the professionals in these areas with our Mergers and Acquisitions
industry specialists in order to offer clients customized teams of cross-functional expertise spanning both industry
and practice area expertise.
Strategy
Our focus in our Financial Advisory business is on:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
investing in our intellectual capital through senior professionals who we believe have strong client
relationships and industry expertise;
increasing our contacts with existing clients to further enhance our long-term relationships and our
efforts in developing new client relationships;
developing new client relationships;
expanding the breadth and depth of our industry expertise and selectively adding or reinforcing practice
areas, such as our Capital Advisory, Shareholder Advisory and Sovereign Advisory groups;
coordinating our industry specialty activities on a global basis and increasing the integration of our
industry experts in Mergers and Acquisitions with our other professionals;
selectively bolstering our existing presence in certain local markets;
broadening our geographic presence by adding new offices;
investing in our technology infrastructure and data science capabilities to enhance our business; and
deploying our intellectual capital, strong client relationships and other assets to generate new revenue
streams.
In addition to the investments made as part of this strategy, we believe that our Financial Advisory business
may benefit from external market factors, including:
•
•
•
•
•
demand for independent, sophisticated financial advice;
recapitalization and related activities in developed and emerging markets;
relatively low interest rates and high corporate cash balances;
favorable levels of cross-border M&A and large capitalization M&A, two of our areas of historical
specialization; and
possible M&A activity that may result from tax, regulatory and similar reform in certain regions,
including the U.S.
Going forward, our strategic emphasis in our Financial Advisory business is to leverage the investments we
have made to grow our business and drive our productivity. We continue to seek to opportunistically attract
outstanding individuals to our business. We routinely reassess our strategic position and may in the future seek
opportunities to further enhance our competitive position.
Asset Management
Our Asset Management business offers a broad range of global investment solutions and investment
management services in equity and fixed income strategies, alternative investments and private equity funds to
corporations, public funds, sovereign entities, endowments and foundations, labor funds, financial intermediaries
and private clients. Our goal in our Asset Management business is to produce superior risk-adjusted investment
returns and provide customized investment solutions for our clients through the active management of their
4
portfolios. Our investment teams construct and manage portfolios using various techniques and investment
philosophies, including traditional fundamental research and analysis and quantitative tools.
Our top ten clients accounted for 26%, 25% and 21% of our total assets under management (“AUM”) for the
years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, with no client individually contributing more than
10% of our Asset Management segment net revenue during any of the respective years. Approximately 88% of our
AUM as of December 31, 2018 was managed on behalf of institutional clients, including corporations, labor unions,
public pension funds, insurance companies and banks, and through sub-advisory relationships, mutual fund
sponsors, broker-dealers and registered advisors, and approximately 12% of our AUM was managed on behalf of
individual client relationships, which are principally with family offices and high-net worth individuals.
The charts below illustrate the mix of our AUM as of December 31, 2018, measured by broad product strategy
and by office location.
AUM BY PRODUCT
AUM BY OFFICE LOCATION
Emerging Markets
Fixed Income
7%
Alternative Investments
1%
Multi-Regional/
Fixed Income
3%
Local/Multi-
Regional Equity
44%
Private Equity 1%
Emerging Markets
Equity
20%
Global/Local
Fixed Income
5%
Global Equity
19%
Asia
3%
Australia
5%
Japan
5%
Germany
6%
U.K.
11%
France
10%
North America
60%
Our Asset Management business maintains offices in New York, Amsterdam, Bordeaux, Boston, Brussels,
Chicago, Dubai, Dublin, Frankfurt, Geneva, Hamburg, Hong Kong, London, Lyon, Madrid, Melbourne, Milan,
Montreal, Nantes, Paris, San Francisco, Seoul, Singapore, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto and Zurich. These operations,
with 102 managing directors and 1,014 other professionals and support staff as of December 31, 2018, provide our
Asset Management business with both a global presence and a local identity.
Primary distinguishing features of these operations include:
•
•
•
a global footprint with global research, global mandates and global clients;
a broad-based team of investment professionals, including focused, in-house investment analysts across
all products and platforms, many of whom have substantial industry or sector specific expertise; and
world-wide brand recognition and multi-channel distribution capabilities.
Our Investment Philosophy, Process and Research
Our investment philosophy is generally based upon a fundamental security selection approach to investing.
Across many of our products, we apply three key principles to investment portfolios:
•
•
•
select securities, not markets;
evaluate a company’s financial position, outlook, opportunities and risks, together with its valuation;
and
manage risk.
In searching for investment opportunities, many of our investment professionals follow an investment process
that incorporates several interconnected components that may include:
•
•
fundamental analysis;
quantitative analysis;
5
•
•
•
•
accounting analysis;
security selection and portfolio construction;
risk management; and
environmental, social and governance factors.
In our Asset Management business, we conduct investment research on a global basis to develop market,
industry and company specific insights and evaluate investment opportunities. Many of our global equity analysts,
located in our worldwide offices, are organized around global industry sectors.
Investment Strategies
Our Asset Management business provides equity, fixed income, cash management and alternative investment
strategies to our clients, paying close attention to our clients’ varying and expanding investment needs. We offer the
following product platform of investment strategies:
Equity
Global
Global
Large Capitalization
Small Capitalization
Thematic
Convertibles
Listed Infrastructure
Quantitative
Trend
Real Estate
Multi Strategies
Managed Volatility
Real Assets
Multi-Factor
Global Ex
Global Ex-U.K.
Global Ex-Japan
Global Ex-Australia
Multi-Regional
Pan-European
Large Capitalization
Small Capitalization
Multi-Capitalization
Value
Quantitative
Local
U.S.
Large Capitalization
Mid Capitalization
Small/Mid Capitalization
Small Capitalization
Multi-Capitalization
Real Estate
Eurozone
Large Capitalization
Small Capitalization
Continental European
Small Capitalization
Multi Capitalization
Eurozone
Euro-Trend (Thematic)
Other
U.K. (Large Capitalization)
U.K. (Small Capitalization)
U.K. Quantitative
Australia
France (Large Capitalization)
France (Small Capitalization)
Japan
Korea
Emerging Markets
Global
Large Capitalization
Small Capitalization
Quantitative
Multi Strategies
Managed Volatility
Latin America
Latin America
Middle East North
Africa
Middle East North
Africa
Fixed Income and
Cash Management
Global
Core Fixed Income
High Yield
Short Duration
Asian
Asia Ex-Japan
Quantitative
Europe, Australasia
and Far East
Large Capitalization
Small Capitalization
Multi-Capitalization
Quantitative
Pan-European
Core Fixed Income
High Yield
Cash Management
Duration Overlay
Eurozone
Fixed Income
Cash Management
Corporate Bonds
6
Global
Emerging Debt
Emerging Corporates
U.S.
Core Fixed Income
High Yield
Short Duration
Municipals
Cash Management
Non-U.S.
U.K. Fixed Income
Alternative
Global
Global
Fund of Closed-End
Funds (Long and
Long/Short)
Convertible
Arbitrage/Relative
Value
Multi Asset
Commodities
Multi-Regional
European
Long/Short Equity
Local
U.S.
U.S. (Long/Short)
Market Neutral
Non-U.S.
Japan (Long/Short)
Emerging Markets
Global
Emerging Income
Emerging Debt
Fund of Hedge Funds
In addition to the primary investment strategies listed above, we also provide other asset management services
to our clients, including asset allocation and other investment advisory services, as well as locally customized
investment solutions. In many cases, we also offer both diversified and more concentrated versions of our products.
These products are generally offered on a separate account basis, as well as through pooled vehicles.
Distribution. We distribute our products through a broad array of marketing channels on a global basis.
Marketing, sales and client service efforts are organized through a global market delivery and service network, with
distribution professionals located in cities including New York, Amsterdam, Bordeaux, Boston, Brussels, Chicago,
Dubai, Frankfurt, Geneva, Hamburg, Hong Kong, London, Lyon, Madrid, Milan, Melbourne, Montreal, Nantes,
Paris, San Francisco, Seoul, Singapore, Sydney, Tokyo, Toronto and Zurich. We have developed a well-established
presence in the institutional asset management arena, managing assets for corporations, labor unions, sovereign
wealth funds and public pension funds around the world. In addition, we manage assets for insurance companies,
savings and trust banks, endowments, foundations and charities.
We also have become a leading firm in managing mutual funds, sub-advisory funds, and separately managed
accounts for many of the world’s largest broker-dealers, insurance companies, registered advisors and other
financial intermediaries.
Strategy
Our strategic plan in our Asset Management business is to focus on delivering superior investment
performance and client service and broadening our product offerings and distribution in selected areas in order to
continue to drive improved business results. Over the past several years, in an effort to improve our Asset
Management business’ operations and expand our Asset Management business, we have:
•
•
•
•
•
•
focused on enhancing our investment performance;
improved our investment management platform by adding a number of senior investment professionals
(including portfolio managers and analysts);
continued to strengthen our marketing and consultant relations capabilities, including by expanding our
marketing resources;
expanded our product platform, including through the addition of long/short equity strategies,
quantitative equity strategies, a real asset strategy, a commodities team and an international value equity
team;
invested in our technology infrastructure and data science capabilities to enhance our business; and
continued to expand the geographic reach of our Asset Management business, including through
opening offices in Amsterdam and Melbourne, and expanding in Milan and Zurich.
We believe that our Asset Management business has long maintained an outstanding team of portfolio
managers and global research analysts. We intend to maintain and supplement our intellectual capital to achieve our
goals. We routinely reassess our strategic position and may in the future seek acquisitions or other transactions,
including the opportunistic hiring of new employees, in order to further enhance our competitive position. We also
believe that our specific investment strategies, global reach, unique brand identity and access to multiple distribution
channels may allow us to expand into new investment products, strategies and geographic locations. In addition, we
7
may expand our participation in alternative investment activities through investments in new and successor funds,
and through organic growth, acquisitions or otherwise. We may also continue to expand our geographic reach.
Alternative Investments
Since 2005, we have been engaged in selected alternative investments and private equity activities. In 2009,
we established a private equity business with The Edgewater Funds (“Edgewater”), a Chicago-based private equity
firm, through the acquisition of Edgewater’s management vehicles. As of December 31, 2018, Edgewater had
approximately $1 billion of AUM and unfunded fee-earning commitments.
Historically, Lazard also has made selected investments with its own capital, often alongside capital of
qualified institutional and individual investors in connection with Lazard’s selected alternative investments and
private equity activities. These investments typically have been organized in funds that make substantial or
controlling investments in private or public companies, generally through privately negotiated transactions and with
a view to divest within two to seven years. While potentially risky and frequently illiquid, such investments, when
successful, can yield investors substantial returns on capital and generate attractive management and performance-
based incentive fees for the sponsor of such funds.
Employees
We believe that our people are our most important asset, and it is their reputation, talent, integrity and
dedication that underpin our success. As of December 31, 2018, we employed 2,996 people, which included 166
managing directors and 1,312 other professionals and support staff in our Financial Advisory segment and 102
managing directors and 1,014 other professionals and support staff in our Asset Management segment. We strive to
maintain a work environment that fosters professionalism, excellence, diversity and inclusion, collaboration and
cooperation among our employees worldwide. We generally utilize an evaluation process at the end of each year to
measure performance, determine compensation and provide guidance on opportunities for improved performance.
Generally, our employees are not subject to any collective bargaining agreements, except that our employees in
certain of our offices, including France and Italy, are covered by national, industry-wide collective bargaining
agreements. We believe that we have good relations with our employees.
Competition
The financial services industry, and all of the businesses in which we compete, are intensely competitive, and
we expect them to remain so. Our competitors are other investment banking and financial advisory firms, broker-
dealers, commercial and “universal” banks, insurance companies, investment management firms, hedge fund
management firms, alternative investment firms and other financial institutions. We compete with some of them
globally and with others on a regional, product or niche basis. We compete on the basis of a number of factors,
including quality of people, transaction execution skills, investment track record, quality of client service, individual
and institutional client relationships, absence of conflicts, range and price of products and services, innovation,
brand recognition and business reputation.
While our competitors vary by country in our Financial Advisory business, we believe our primary
competitors in securing engagements include Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Barclays, Centerview Partners,
Citigroup, Credit Suisse, Deutsche Bank, Evercore Partners, Goldman Sachs, Greenhill, JPMorgan Chase, Morgan
Stanley, Rothschild and UBS. In our Restructuring practice, we believe our primary competitors include Centerview
Partners, Evercore Partners, Houlihan Lokey, PJT Partners, Moelis & Company and Rothschild.
We believe that our primary global competitors in our Asset Management business include, in the case of
Lazard Asset Management LLC (“LAM LLC”) and its subsidiaries (collectively, “LAM”), Aberdeen, Acadian,
Alliance Bernstein, Capital Management & Research, Fidelity, Franklin Templeton, Invesco, JP Morgan Asset
Management, Lord Abbett, MFS, Neuberger Berman and Schroders and, in the case of Lazard Frères Gestion SAS
(“LFG”), private banks with offices in France as well as large institutional banks and fund managers. We face
competition in private equity both in the pursuit of outside investors for our private equity funds and the acquisition
8
of investments in attractive portfolio companies. We compete with hundreds of other funds, many of which are
subsidiaries of, or otherwise affiliated with, large financial service providers.
Competition is also intense in each of our businesses for the attraction and retention of qualified employees,
and we compete, among other factors, on the level and nature of compensation and equity-based incentives for key
employees. Our ability to continue to compete effectively in our businesses will depend upon our ability to attract
new employees and retain and motivate our existing employees, in each case, at appropriate compensation levels.
Many of our competitors are large, consolidated financial institutions that have the ability to offer a wider
range of products than we offer, including loans, deposit taking, insurance and brokerage services. Many of these
firms also offer more extensive asset management and investment banking services, which may enhance their
competitive position. They also may have the ability to support investment banking and investment management
products with commercial banking, insurance and other financial services revenue in an effort to gain market share,
which could result in pricing pressure in our businesses. At the same time, demand for independent financial advice
has created opportunities for new entrants, including a number of boutique financial advisory firms. These boutique
firms frequently compete, among other factors, on the basis of their independent financial advice, and their activities
also could result in pricing and other competitive pressure in our businesses. We also face competition from asset
management firms that specialize in providing passively managed investment strategies at relatively low costs,
which could result in pricing pressure in our Asset Management business.
See Item 1A, “Risk Factors—The financial services industry, and all of the businesses in which we compete,
are intensely competitive” below.
Regulation
Our businesses, as well as the financial services industry generally, are subject to extensive regulation
throughout the world. As a matter of public policy, regulatory bodies are charged with safeguarding the integrity of
the securities and other financial markets and with protecting the interests of customers participating in those
markets, not with protecting the interests of our stockholders or creditors. Many of our affiliates that participate in
securities markets are subject to comprehensive regulations that include some form of minimum capital retention
requirements and customer protection rules. In the U.S., certain of our subsidiaries are subject to such regulations
promulgated by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), and/or the Financial Industry
Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”). Standards, requirements and rules implemented throughout the European Union
are broadly comparable in scope and purpose to the regulatory capital and customer protection requirements
imposed under the SEC and FINRA rules. European Union directives also permit local regulation in each
jurisdiction, including those in which we operate, to be more restrictive than the requirements of such European
Union-wide directives. These sometimes burdensome local requirements can result in certain competitive
disadvantages to us.
In the U.S., the SEC is the federal agency responsible for the administration of the federal securities laws.
FINRA is a voluntary, self-regulatory body composed of members, such as our broker-dealer subsidiaries, that have
agreed to abide by FINRA’s rules and regulations. The SEC, FINRA and other U.S. and non-U.S. regulatory
organizations may examine the activities of, and may expel, fine and otherwise discipline us and our employees. The
laws, rules and regulations comprising this framework of regulation and the interpretation and enforcement of
existing laws, rules and regulations are constantly changing. The effect of any such changes cannot be predicted and
may impact the manner of operation and profitability of our businesses.
Our principal U.S. broker-dealer subsidiary, Lazard Frères & Co. LLC (“LFNY”), through which we conduct
most of our U.S. Financial Advisory business, is currently registered as a broker-dealer with the SEC and FINRA,
and as a broker-dealer in all 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. As such, LFNY is subject to
regulations governing most aspects of the securities business, including regulations regarding minimum capital
retention requirements, record-keeping and reporting procedures, relationships with customers, experience and
training requirements for certain employees, and business procedures with firms that are not members of certain
regulatory bodies. In addition, LFNY is a member organization of the New York Stock Exchange LLC and the
NYSE MKT LLC and is subject to various rules and regulations that have been promulgated by these securities
exchanges. Lazard Asset Management Securities LLC (“LAM Securities”), a subsidiary of LAM LLC, is registered
9
as a broker-dealer with the SEC and FINRA and in all 50 U.S. states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico.
Lazard Middle Market LLC is registered as a broker-dealer with the SEC and FINRA, and as a broker-dealer in
various U.S. states and territories.
Our U.S. broker-dealer subsidiaries, including LFNY, are subject to the SEC’s uniform net capital rule,
Rule 15c3-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the net capital rules
of FINRA, which may limit our ability to make withdrawals of capital from our broker-dealer subsidiaries. The
uniform net capital rule sets the minimum level of net capital a broker-dealer must maintain and also requires that a
portion of its assets be relatively liquid. FINRA may prohibit a member firm from expanding its business or paying
cash dividends if it would result in net capital falling below FINRA’s requirements. In addition, our broker-dealer
subsidiaries are subject to certain notification requirements related to withdrawals of excess net capital. Our broker-
dealer subsidiaries are also subject to regulations, including the USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, which impose
obligations regarding the prevention and detection of money-laundering activities, including the establishment of
customer due diligence and other compliance policies and procedures. Failure to comply with these requirements
may result in monetary, regulatory and, in certain cases, criminal penalties.
Certain U.K. subsidiaries of Lazard Group, including Lazard & Co., Limited (“LCL”), Lazard Fund Managers
Limited and Lazard Asset Management Limited, which we refer to in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Form
10-K”) as the “U.K. subsidiaries,” are authorized and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”),
and are subject to various rules and regulations made by the FCA under the authorities conferred upon it by the
Financial Services and Markets Act 2000, as amended by the Financial Services Act 2012.
We also have other subsidiaries that are registered as broker-dealers (or have similar non-U.S. registration) in
various jurisdictions.
Certain of our Asset Management subsidiaries are registered as investment advisors with the SEC. As a
registered investment advisor, each is subject to the requirements of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as
amended (the “Investment Advisers Act”), and the SEC’s regulations thereunder. Such requirements relate to,
among other things, the relationship between an advisor and its advisory clients, as well as general anti-fraud
prohibitions. LAM LLC serves as an investment advisor to several U.S. mutual funds which are registered under the
Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”). The Investment Company Act
regulates, among other things, the relationship between a mutual fund and its investment advisor (and other service
providers) and prohibits or severely restricts principal transactions between an advisor and its advisory clients,
imposes record-keeping and reporting requirements, disclosure requirements, limitations on trades where a single
broker acts as the agent for both the buyer and seller, and limitations on affiliated transactions and joint transactions.
LAM Securities serves as an underwriter or distributor for mutual funds and private funds managed by LAM, and as
an introducing broker to Pershing LLC for unmanaged accounts of certain of LAM LLC’s private clients.
Compagnie Financière Lazard Frères SAS (“CFLF”), our French subsidiary under which asset management
and commercial banking activities are carried out in France, is subject to regulation by the Autorité de Contrôle
Prudentiel et de Résolution (“ACPR”) for its banking activities conducted through our Paris-based banking
subsidiary, Lazard Frères Banque SA (“LFB”). The investment services activities of the Paris group, exercised
through LFB and other subsidiaries of CFLF, primarily LFG (asset management), also are subject to regulation and
supervision by the Autorité des Marchés Financiers. In addition, pursuant to the consolidated supervision rules in the
European Union, LFB, in particular, as a French credit institution, is required to be supervised by a regulatory body,
either in the U.S. or in the European Union. In 2013, the Company and the ACPR agreed on terms for the
consolidated supervision of LFB and certain other non-Financial Advisory European subsidiaries of the Company
(referred to herein, on a combined basis, as the “combined European regulated group”) under such rules. Under this
supervision, the combined European regulated group is required to comply with minimum requirements for
regulatory net capital to be reported on a quarterly basis and satisfy periodic financial and other reporting
obligations. Additionally, the combined European regulated group, together with our European Financial Advisory
entities, is required to perform an annual risk assessment and provide certain other information on a periodic basis,
including financial reports and information relating to financial performance, balance sheet data and capital
structure.
10
As a result of certain changes effected by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
(the “Dodd-Frank Act”) related to the regulation of over-the-counter swaps and other derivative instruments, LAM
and certain of its subsidiaries have registered with the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (the “CFTC”)
and the National Futures Association (the “NFA”), and are subject to certain aspects of the U.S. Commodity
Exchange Act and the regulations thereunder, and to the rules of the NFA. The CFTC and the NFA have authority
over the laws, rules and regulations related to commodities (including the over-the-counter swaps and derivatives
markets), and regulate our relationship with clients who trade in these instruments. The U.S. Commodity Exchange
Act and the regulations thereunder also impose additional record-keeping and reporting requirements and disclosure
requirements on LAM and its subsidiaries.
In addition, the Central Bank of Ireland, the Japanese Ministry of Finance and Financial Services Agency, the
Korean Financial Supervisory Commission, the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong, the Monetary
Authority of Singapore, the Australian Securities & Investments Commission, the Dubai Financial Services
Authority, the Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority, the Italian Companies and Stock Exchange
Commission and the German Federal Financial Supervisory Authority, among others, regulate relevant operating
subsidiaries of the Company and also have capital standards and other requirements broadly comparable to the rules
of the SEC. Our business is also subject to regulation by other non-U.S. governmental and regulatory bodies and
self-regulatory authorities in other countries in which we operate.
Regulators are empowered to conduct periodic examinations and initiate administrative proceedings that can
result, among other things, in censure, fine, the issuance of cease-and-desist orders or the suspension or expulsion or
other disciplining of a broker-dealer or investment advisor or its directors, officers or employees.
We are also subject to various anti-bribery, anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing laws, rules
and regulations in the jurisdictions in which we operate. The U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, for example,
generally prohibits offering, promising or giving, or authorizing others to give, anything of value, either directly or
indirectly, to a non-U.S. government official in order to influence official action or otherwise gain an unfair business
advantage, such as to obtain or retain business. Similar rules and regulations exist in other jurisdictions in which we
operate. In addition, we are required to comply with economic sanctions and embargo programs administered by the
U.S. Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control and by similar governmental agencies and other authorities
worldwide. Violations of any of these laws, rules, regulations and programs can give rise to administrative, civil or
criminal penalties.
The U.S. and other governments and institutions have taken actions, and may continue to take further actions,
that affect the global financial markets. Such further actions could include expanding current or enacting new
standards, requirements and rules that may be applicable to us and our subsidiaries. The effect of any such expanded
or new standards, requirements and rules is uncertain and could have adverse consequences to our business and
results of operations. See Item 1A, “Risk Factors—Other Business Risks—Extensive regulation of our businesses
limits our activities and results in ongoing exposure to the potential for significant penalties, including fines or
limitations on our ability to conduct our businesses.”
11
Executive Officers of the Registrant
Set forth below are the name, age, present title, principal occupation and certain biographical information for
each of our executive officers as of February 19, 2019, all of whom have been appointed by, and serve at the
discretion of, our board of directors.
Kenneth M. Jacobs, 60
Mr. Jacobs has served as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of Lazard Ltd and
Lazard Group since November 2009. Mr. Jacobs has served as a Managing Director of Lazard since 1991 and had
been a Deputy Chairman of Lazard from January 2002 until November 2009. Mr. Jacobs also served as Chief
Executive Officer of Lazard North America from January 2002 until November 2009. Mr. Jacobs initially joined
Lazard in 1988. Mr. Jacobs is a member of the Board of Trustees of the University of Chicago and the Brookings
Institution.
Evan L. Russo, 44
Mr. Russo became Chief Financial Officer of Lazard Ltd and Lazard Group in October 2017. Mr. Russo has
served as a Managing Director of Lazard since 2009, and, prior to becoming Chief Financial Officer, was Co-Head
of Lazard’s Capital Markets and Capital Structure Advisory practice. Mr. Russo joined Lazard as a Director in 2007.
Prior to joining Lazard, Mr. Russo worked for Goldman, Sachs & Co. in the Investment Banking Division, and prior
to that, for Barclays Capital. Mr. Russo began his career as a corporate attorney with the law firm of Milbank,
Tweed, Hadley & McCloy.
Ashish Bhutani, 58
Mr. Bhutani has served as a member of the Board of Directors of Lazard Ltd and Lazard Group since March
2010. Mr. Bhutani is a Vice Chairman and a Managing Director of Lazard and has been the Chief Executive Officer
of LAM since March 2004. Mr. Bhutani previously served as Head of New Products and Strategic Planning for
LAM from June 2003 to March 2004. Prior to joining Lazard, he was Co-Chief Executive Officer, North America,
of Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein from 2001 to the end of 2002, and was a member of its Global Corporate and
Markets Board, and a member of its Global Executive Committee. Mr. Bhutani worked at Wasserstein Perella
Group (the predecessor to Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein) from 1989 to 2001, serving as Deputy Chairman of
Wasserstein Perella Group and Chief Executive Officer of Wasserstein Perella Securities from 1994 to 2001.
Mr. Bhutani began his career at Salomon Brothers in 1985, where he was a Vice President in Fixed Income.
Mr. Bhutani is a member of the Board of Directors of four registered investment companies, which are part of the
Lazard fund complex. Mr. Bhutani is also a member of the Board of Directors of City Harvest.
Scott D. Hoffman, 56
Mr. Hoffman has served as Chief Administrative Officer of Lazard Ltd and Lazard Group since July 2017 and
as General Counsel of Lazard Ltd since May 2005. Mr. Hoffman has served as a Managing Director of Lazard since
January 1999 and General Counsel of Lazard Group since January 2001. Mr. Hoffman previously served as Vice
President and Assistant General Counsel from February 1994 to December 1997 and as a Director from January
1998 to December 1998. Prior to joining Lazard, Mr. Hoffman was an attorney at Cravath, Swaine & Moore LLP.
Mr. Hoffman is a member of the Board of Trustees of the New York University School of Law and a member of the
Board of Directors of the Film Society of Lincoln Center.
Alexander F. Stern, 52
Mr. Stern has served as Chief Operating Officer of Lazard Ltd and Lazard Group since November 2008.
Mr. Stern has served as a Managing Director of Lazard since January 2002, as Chief Executive Officer, Financial
Advisory, since April 2015, and as Global Head of Strategy since February 2006. Mr. Stern previously served as a
Vice President in Lazard’s Financial Advisory business from January 1998 to December 2000 and as a Director
from January 2001 to December 2001. Mr. Stern initially joined Lazard in 1994 and previously held various
positions with Patricof & Co. Ventures and IBM. Mr. Stern is the chairman of the Board of Directors of LUNGevity
Foundation.
12
Where You Can Find Additional Information
Lazard Ltd files current, annual and quarterly reports, proxy statements and other information required by the
Exchange Act with the SEC. The Company’s SEC filings are available to the public from the SEC’s internet site at
http://www.sec.gov.
Our public website is http://www.lazard.com and the investor relations section hosts our SEC filings. We will
make available free of charge, on or through the investor relations section of our website, our annual reports on
Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and Forms 3, 4 and 5
filed on behalf of directors and executive officers and any amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to
the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to,
the SEC. Also posted on our website, and available in print upon request of any Lazard Ltd shareholder to the
Investor Relations Department, are charters for the Company’s Audit Committee, Compensation Committee,
Nominating & Governance Committee and Workplace and Culture Committee. Copies of these charters and our
Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics governing our directors, officers and
employees are also posted on the investor relations section of our website in the corporate governance subsection.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the following risks and all of the other information set forth in this Form 10-K,
including our consolidated financial statements and related notes. The following risks comprise the material risks of
which we are aware. If any of the events or developments described below actually occurred, our business, financial
condition or results of operations would likely suffer.
Difficult market conditions can adversely affect our business in many ways, including by reducing the
volume of transactions involving our Financial Advisory business and reducing the value or performance of
the assets we manage in our Asset Management business, which, in each case, could materially reduce our
revenue or income and adversely affect our financial position.
As a financial services firm, our businesses are materially affected by conditions in the global financial
markets and economic conditions throughout the world. Unfavorable economic and market conditions can adversely
affect our financial performance in both the Financial Advisory and Asset Management businesses. The future
market and economic climate may deteriorate because of many factors, such as a general slowing of economic
growth globally or regionally, periods of disruption or volatility in securities markets, volatility and tightening of
liquidity in credit markets, volatility or significant realignments in currency markets, increases in interest rates,
inflation, corporate or sovereign defaults, natural disasters, terrorism or political uncertainty.
For example, revenue generated by our Financial Advisory business is directly related to the volume and value
of the transactions in which we are involved. During periods of unfavorable or uncertain market or economic
conditions, the volume and value of M&A transactions may decrease, thereby reducing the demand for our Financial
Advisory services and increasing price competition among financial services companies seeking such engagements.
Our results of operations would be adversely affected by any such reduction in the volume or value of M&A
transactions. In addition, our profitability would be adversely affected due to our fixed costs and the possibility that
we would be unable to reduce our variable costs without reducing revenue or within a timeframe sufficient to offset
any decreases in revenue relating to changes in market and economic conditions.
Within our Financial Advisory business, we have typically seen that, during periods of economic strength and
growth, our Mergers and Acquisitions practice historically has been more active and our Restructuring practice has
been less active. Conversely, during periods of economic weakness and contraction, we typically have seen that our
Restructuring practice has been more active and our Mergers and Acquisitions practice has been less active. As a
result, revenue from our Restructuring practice has tended to correlate negatively to our revenue from our Mergers
and Acquisitions practice over the course of business cycles. These trends are cyclical in nature and subject to
periodic reversal. However, these trends do not cancel out the impact of economic conditions in our Financial
Advisory business, which may be adversely affected by a downturn in economic conditions leading to decreased
Mergers and Acquisitions practice activity, notwithstanding improvements in our Restructuring practice. Moreover,
13
revenue improvements in our Mergers and Acquisitions practice in strong economic conditions could be offset in
whole or in part by any related revenue declines in our Restructuring practice. While we generally have experienced
a counter-cyclical relationship between our Mergers and Acquisitions practice and our Restructuring practice, this
relationship may not continue in the future, and there is no certainty that strength in one practice will offset
weakness in the other.
Our Asset Management business also would be expected to generate lower revenue in a market or general
economic downturn. Under our Asset Management business’s arrangements, investment advisory fees we receive
typically are based on the market value of AUM. Accordingly, a decline in the prices of securities, or in specific
geographic markets or sectors that constitute a significant portion of our AUM (e.g., our emerging markets
strategies), would be expected to cause our revenue and income to decline by causing:
•
•
•
•
the value of our AUM to decrease, which would result in lower investment advisory fees;
some of our clients to withdraw funds from our Asset Management business due to the uncertainty or
volatility in the market, or in favor of investments they perceive as offering greater opportunity or lower
risk, which would also result in lower investment advisory fees;
some of our clients or prospective clients to hesitate in allocating assets to our Asset Management
business due to the uncertainty or volatility in the market, which would also result in lower investment
advisory fees; or
negative absolute performance returns for some accounts which have performance-based incentive fees,
which would result in a reduction of revenue from such fees.
Our AUM has declined from time to time during recent periods. For example, total AUM at December 31,
2018 was $215 billion, a decrease of 14% as compared to total AUM at December 31, 2017. If our Asset
Management revenue declines without a commensurate reduction in our expenses, our net income would be
reduced. In addition, in the event of a market or general economic downturn, our alternative investment and private
equity practices also may be impacted by a difficult fund raising environment and reduced exit opportunities in
which to realize the value of their investments. Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates may also affect the
levels of our AUM and our investment advisory fees. See “Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could
reduce our stockholders’ equity and net income or negatively impact the portfolios of our Asset Management clients
and may affect the levels of our AUM” below.
Due to the nature of our business, financial results could differ significantly from period to period,
which may make it difficult for us to achieve steady earnings growth on a quarterly basis.
We experience significant fluctuations in quarterly revenue and profits. These fluctuations generally can be
attributed to the fact that we earn a substantial portion of our Financial Advisory revenue upon the successful
completion of a transaction or a restructuring, the timing of which is uncertain and is not subject to our control. As a
result, our Financial Advisory business is highly dependent on market conditions and the decisions and actions of
our clients, interested third parties and governmental authorities. For example, a client or counterparty could delay
or terminate an acquisition transaction because of a failure to agree upon final terms, failure to obtain necessary
regulatory consents or board of directors, or acquirer’s or stockholder approval, failure to secure necessary
financing, adverse market conditions or because the seller’s business is experiencing unexpected operating or
financial problems. Anticipated bidders for assets of a client during a restructuring transaction may not materialize
or our client may not be able to restructure its operations or indebtedness, for example, due to a failure to reach
agreement with its principal creditors. In addition, a bankruptcy court may deny our right to collect a “success” or
“completion” fee. In these circumstances, other than in engagements where we receive monthly retainers, we often
do not receive any advisory fees other than the reimbursement of certain expenses, despite the fact that we devote
resources to these transactions. Accordingly, the failure of one or more transactions to close either as anticipated or
at all could cause significant fluctuations in quarterly revenue and profits and could materially adversely affect our
business, financial condition and results of operations. For more information, see “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”.
14
In addition, our Asset Management revenue is particularly sensitive to fluctuations in our AUM. Asset
Management fees are predominantly based on the daily, monthly or quarterly average AUM. As a result, a reduction
in AUM at the end of a day, month or quarter (as a result of market depreciation, withdrawals, fluctuations in
foreign currency exchange rates or otherwise) will result in a decrease in management fees. Similarly, the timing of
flows, contributions and withdrawals are often out of our control and may be inconsistent from quarter to quarter.
Incentive fees are driven by investment performance (either absolute performance or relative to an established
benchmark), which is directly impacted by market movements, and may therefore fluctuate from period to period.
As a result of such fluctuations, it may be difficult for us to achieve steady revenue and earnings growth on a
quarterly basis.
Our ability to retain our managing directors and other key professional employees is critical to the
success of our business, including maintaining compensation levels at an appropriate level of costs, and
failure to do so may materially adversely affect our results of operations and financial position.
Our people are our most important asset. We must retain the services of our managing directors and other key
professional employees, and strategically recruit and hire new talented employees, to obtain and successfully
execute the Financial Advisory and Asset Management engagements that generate substantially all of our revenue.
In general, our industry continues to experience change and be subject to significant competitive pressures
with respect to the retention of top talent, which makes it more difficult for us to retain professionals. Loss of key
employees may occur due to perceived opportunity for promotion, compensation levels, work environment,
retirement or the pursuit of philanthropic, civic or similar service opportunities, or other individual reasons, some of
which may be beyond our control. If managing directors and other key professional employees were to retire, join an
existing competitor, form a competing company or otherwise leave us, we could need to replace them, and some of
our clients could eventually choose to use the services of that competitor or some other competitor instead of our
services. In any such event, our investment banking fees, asset management fees or AUM could decline. The
employment arrangements, non-competition agreements and retention agreements we have or will enter into with
our managing directors and other key professional employees may not sufficiently prevent our managing directors
and other key professional employees from resigning from practice or competing against us. In addition, these
arrangements and agreements have a limited duration and expire after a certain period of time. We continue to be
subject to intense competition in the financial services industry regarding the recruitment and retention of key
professionals, and have experienced departures from and added to our professional ranks as a result.
Certain changes to our employee compensation arrangements may result in increased compensation and
benefits expense. In addition, any changes to the mix of cash and deferred incentive compensation granted to our
employees may affect certain financial measures applicable to our business, including ratios of compensation and
benefits expense to revenue, and may result in the issuance of increased levels of Lazard Ltd’s Class A common
stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Class A common stock”), to our employees upon vesting of restricted stock units
(“RSUs”), performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSUs”), restricted stock awards or other equity-based awards
in a particular year. Our compensation levels, results of operations and financial position may be significantly
affected by many factors, including general economic and market conditions, our operating and financial
performance, staffing levels and competitive pay conditions.
The financial services industry, and all of the businesses in which we compete, are intensely competitive.
The financial services industry is intensely competitive, and we expect it to remain so. We compete on the
basis of a number of factors, including the quality of our advice, our employees and transaction execution, the range
and price of our products and services, our innovation and our reputation. We have experienced intense fee
competition in some of our businesses in recent years, and we believe that we may experience pricing pressures in
these and other areas in the future as some of our competitors seek to obtain increased market share by reducing
fees.
A number of factors increase the competitive risks of our Financial Advisory and Asset Management
businesses:
•
there are relatively few barriers to entry impeding the launch of new asset management and financial
advisory firms, including a relatively low cost of entering these businesses, and the successful efforts of
15
new entrants into our lines of business, including major banks and other financial institutions, have
resulted in increased competition;
other industry participants will from time to time seek to recruit our employees away from us in order to
compete in our lines of business; and
certain of our practices and products are newly established and relatively small.
•
•
In addition, many of our competitors have the ability to offer a wide range of products, from loans, deposit-
taking and insurance to brokerage, asset management and investment banking services, which may enhance their
competitive position. They may also have the ability to support investment banking, including financial advisory
services, with commercial banking, insurance and other financial services in an effort to gain market share, which
could result in pricing pressure in our businesses.
Competitive pressure could adversely affect our ability to attract new or retain existing clients, make
successful investments, retain our people or maintain AUM, any of which would adversely affect our results of
operations and financial condition.
A substantial portion of our revenue is derived from Financial Advisory fees, which are not long-term
contracted sources of revenue and are subject to intense competition, and declines in our Financial Advisory
engagements could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
We historically have earned a substantial portion of our revenue from advisory fees paid to us by our Financial
Advisory clients, which usually are payable upon the successful completion of a particular transaction or
restructuring. For example, for the year ended December 31, 2018, Financial Advisory services accounted for
approximately 55% of our consolidated net revenue. We expect that we will continue to rely on Financial Advisory
fees for a substantial portion of our revenue for the foreseeable future, and a decline in our Financial Advisory
engagements or the market for financial advisory services would adversely affect our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
In addition, we operate in a highly competitive environment where typically there are no long-term contracted
sources of revenue. Each revenue-generating engagement typically is separately awarded and negotiated.
Furthermore, many businesses do not routinely engage in transactions requiring our services and, as a consequence,
our fee paying engagements with many clients are not likely to be predictable. We also lose clients each year,
including as a result of the sale or merger of a client, a change in a client’s senior management and competition from
other financial advisors and financial institutions. As a result, our engagements with clients are constantly changing
and our Financial Advisory fees could decline quickly due to the factors discussed above.
If the number of debt defaults, bankruptcies or other factors affecting demand for our Restructuring
services declines, our Restructuring revenue could suffer.
We provide various restructuring and restructuring-related advice to companies in financial distress or to their
creditors or other stakeholders. Historically, the fees from restructuring-related services have been a significant part
of our Financial Advisory revenue. A number of factors could affect demand for these advisory services, including
improving general economic conditions, the availability and cost of debt and equity financing and changes to laws,
rules and regulations, including those that protect creditors, and the deregulation or privatization of particular
industries. For example, global restructuring activity during 2018, as measured by the number of corporate defaults,
decreased significantly as compared to 2017.
Potential underwriting and trading activities may expose us to risk.
In 2014, we took steps that have enabled us to act as an underwriter in public offerings and other distributions
of securities in order to buttress our Financial Advisory business. If we act as an underwriter, we may incur losses
and be subject to reputational harm to the extent that, for any reason, we are unable to sell securities we purchased as
an underwriter at the anticipated price levels. In addition, if we act as an underwriter, we may also be subject to
16
liability for material misstatements or omissions in prospectuses and other offering documents relating to offerings
we underwrite. In such cases, any indemnification provisions in the applicable underwriting agreement may not be
available to us or may not be sufficient to protect us against losses arising from such liability. Operational risk in
connection with any offering we underwrite could arise in the form of errors, deficiencies or noncompliance and
also could expose us to risk. In addition, indemnification provisions in our agreement with our clearing organization,
customer trading and other activities may expose us to off-balance sheet credit risk. Securities may have to be
purchased or sold at prevailing market prices in the event a customer fails to settle a trade on its original terms. We
seek to manage the risks associated with underwriting and customer trading activities through screening, internal
review and trading procedures and processes, but such procedures and processes may not be effective in all cases.
Our investment style in our Asset Management business, including the mix of asset classes and
investment strategies comprising our AUM, may underperform or generate less demand than other
investment approaches, which may result in significant client or asset departures, or a reduction in AUM.
Even when securities prices are rising generally, performance can be affected by investment style and mix of
asset classes. For example, many of the equity investment strategies in our Asset Management business share a
common investment orientation towards relative value investing. We believe this style tends to outperform the
market in some market environments and underperform it in others. In particular, a prolonged growth environment
may cause some of our investment strategies to go out of favor with some clients, advisors, consultants or third-
party intermediaries. In addition, all of our investment strategies are actively managed strategies which seek to
outperform relative to a benchmark or generate an absolute return. Management fees for actively managed
strategies tend to be higher than those charged for passively managed strategies. The perception that actively
managed strategies have, on average, underperformed relative to passively managed strategies over time, combined
with greater pressure on clients to acquire asset management services at lower costs, has contributed to increased
trends toward passively managed investment strategies. This, in turn, may adversely affect demand for our strategies
or result in fee pressure on our business overall. In combination with poor performance relative to peers, changes in
personnel, challenging market environments or other difficulties, the underperformance of our investment style may
result in significant client or asset departures or a reduction in AUM.
We could lose clients and suffer a decline in our Asset Management revenue and earnings if the
investments we choose in our Asset Management business perform poorly, regardless of overall trends in the
prices of securities.
Investment performance affects our AUM relating to existing clients and is one of the most important factors
in retaining clients and competing for new Asset Management business. Poor investment performance could impair
our revenue and growth because:
•
•
•
•
existing clients might withdraw funds from our Asset Management business in favor of better
performing products, which would result in lower investment advisory fees;
our incentive fees, which provide us with a set percentage of returns on some alternative investment and
private equity funds and other accounts, would decline;
third-party financial intermediaries, rating services, advisors or consultants may rate our products
poorly, which may result in client withdrawals and reduced asset flows; or
firms with which we have strategic alliances may terminate such relationships with us, and future
strategic alliances may be unavailable.
Over certain time periods, we may have a higher concentration of assets in certain strategies. To the extent
that this is the case, underperformance, changes in investment personnel or other changes in these strategies, as well
as changes in a variety of macroeconomic and other factors, may result in a withdrawal of assets. If a significant
amount of clients withdraw from these strategies for any reason, our revenues would decline and our operating
results would be adversely affected.
17
Because many of our Asset Management clients can remove the assets we manage on short notice, we
may experience unexpected declines in revenue and profitability.
Our investment advisory contracts are generally terminable upon very short notice. Institutional and individual
clients, and firms with which we have strategic alliances, can terminate their relationship with us, reduce the
aggregate amount of AUM or shift their funds to other types of accounts with different rate structures for a number
of reasons, including investment performance, departures from or changes to the teams that manage our investment
products, or changes in prevailing interest rates and financial market performance. Poor performance relative to
other investment management firms tends to result in decreased investments in our investment products, increased
redemptions of our investment products, and the loss of institutional or individual accounts or strategic alliances. In
addition, the ability to terminate relationships may allow clients to renegotiate for lower fees paid for asset
management services.
In addition, in the U.S., as required by the Investment Company Act, each of our investment advisory
contracts with the mutual funds we advise or subadvise automatically terminates upon its “assignment.” Each of our
other investment advisory contracts subject to the provisions of the Investment Advisers Act provide, as required by
the Investment Advisers Act, that the contract may not be “assigned” without the consent of the customer. A sale of
a sufficiently large block of shares of our voting securities or other transactions could be deemed an “assignment” in
certain circumstances. An assignment, actual or constructive, would trigger these termination provisions and could
adversely affect our ability to continue managing client accounts.
Access to clients through intermediaries and consultants is important to our Asset Management
business, and reductions in referrals from such intermediaries or consultants or poor reviews of our products
or our organization by such intermediaries or consultants could materially reduce our revenue and impair
our ability to attract new clients.
Our ability to market our Asset Management services relies in part on receiving mandates from the client base
of national and regional securities firms, banks, insurance companies, defined contribution plan administrators,
investment consultants and other intermediaries. To an increasing extent, our Asset Management business uses
referrals from accountants, lawyers, financial planners and other professional advisors. The inability to have this
access could materially adversely affect our Asset Management business. In addition, many of these intermediaries
and consultants review and evaluate our products and our organization. Poor reviews or evaluations of either the
particular product or of us may result in client withdrawals or an inability to attract new assets through such
intermediaries or consultants.
Our Asset Management business relies on non-affiliated third-party service providers.
Our Asset Management business has entered into service agreements with third-party service providers for
client order management and the execution and settlement of client securities transactions. This business faces the
risk of operational failure of any of our clearing agents, the exchanges, clearing houses or other intermediaries we
use to facilitate our securities transactions. We oversee and manage these relationships. Poor oversight and control
or inferior performance or service on the part of the service provider could result in loss of customers and violations
of applicable rules and regulations. Any such failure could adversely affect our ability to effect transactions and to
manage our exposure to risk.
Our results of operations may be affected by fluctuations in the fair value of positions held in our
investment portfolios.
We invest capital in various types of equity and debt securities in order to seed equity, debt and alternative
investment funds, and for general corporate purposes. Such investments are subject to market fluctuations due to
changes in the market prices of securities, interest rates or other market factors, such as liquidity. While we may
seek to hedge the market risk for some of these investments, an effective hedge may not be available, and if
available, may not be fully effective. These investments are adjusted for accounting purposes to fair value at the end
of each quarter regardless of our intended holding period, with any related gains or losses reflected in our results of
operations, and therefore may increase the volatility of our earnings, even though such gains or losses may not be
realized.
18
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could reduce our stockholders’ equity and net income
or negatively impact the portfolios of our Asset Management clients and may affect the levels of our AUM.
We are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currencies, including through advisory fees paid to our Financial
Advisory business and management fees paid to our Asset Management business. Our financial statements are
denominated in U.S. Dollars and, for the year ended December 31, 2018, we received approximately 40% of our
consolidated net revenue in other currencies, predominantly in Euros, British Pounds and Australian Dollars. In
addition, we pay a significant amount of our expenses in such other currencies. The exchange rates of these
currencies versus the U.S. Dollar affect the carrying value of our assets and liabilities as well as our revenues,
expenses and net income. We do not generally hedge such foreign currency exchange rate exposure arising in our
subsidiaries outside of the U.S. Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates may also make period to period
comparisons of our results of operations difficult.
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates also can impact the portfolios of our Asset Management
clients. Client portfolios are invested in securities across the globe, although most portfolios are funded in a single
base currency. Foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations can adversely impact investment performance for a
client’s portfolio and also may affect the levels of our AUM. As our AUM include significant assets that are
denominated in currencies other than U.S. Dollars, an increase in the value of the U.S. Dollar relative to non-U.S.
currencies, with all other factors held constant, generally would result in a decrease in the dollar value of our AUM,
which, in turn, would result in lower U.S. Dollar-denominated revenue in our Asset Management business. As of
December 31, 2018, AUM with foreign currency exposure represented approximately 70% of our total AUM.
See Note 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the impact on
stockholders’ equity from currency translation adjustments and Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information regarding the impact on operating results from currency transaction
adjustments.
We have investments, primarily through our private equity businesses, in relatively high-risk, illiquid
assets, and we may lose some or all of the principal amount of these investments or fail to realize any profits
from these investments for a considerable period of time.
We have made, and in the future may make, principal investments in public or private companies or in
alternative investments (including private equity funds) established by us, and we continue to hold principal
investments directly or through funds managed by certain affiliates of Lazard, including Edgewater, as well as third
parties. Making principal investments is risky, and we may lose some or all of the principal amount of our
investments. Certain of these types of investments may be in relatively high-risk, illiquid assets. Because it may take
several years before attractive alternative investment opportunities are identified, some or all of the capital
committed by us to these funds is likely to be invested in government securities, other short-term, highly rated debt
securities and money market funds that traditionally have offered investors relatively lower returns. In addition,
these investments may be adjusted for accounting purposes to fair value at the end of each quarter, and any related
gains or losses would affect our results of operations and could increase the volatility of our earnings, even though
such fair value fluctuations may have no cash impact. It takes a substantial period of time to identify attractive
alternative investment opportunities, to raise all the funds needed to make an investment and then to realize the cash
value of an investment through resale. Even if an alternative investment proves to be profitable, it may be several
years or longer before any profits can be realized in cash or other proceeds.
Our revenue from our private equity business is derived primarily from management fees, which are
calculated as a percentage of committed capital or invested capital depending on the stage of each respective fund.
Transaction and advisory fees may also be earned. Incentive fees are earned if investments are profitable over a
specified threshold. Our ability to form new alternative investment funds is subject to a number of uncertainties,
including past performance of our funds, market or economic conditions, competition from other fund managers and
the ability to negotiate terms with major investors.
19
Extensive regulation of our businesses limits our activities and results in ongoing exposure to the
potential for significant penalties, including fines or limitations on our ability to conduct our businesses.
The financial services industry is subject to extensive regulation. We are subject to regulation by
governmental and self-regulatory organizations in the jurisdictions in which we operate around the world. Many of
these regulators, including U.S. and non-U.S. government agencies and self-regulatory organizations, as well as
state securities commissions in the U.S., are empowered to conduct administrative proceedings that can result in
censure, fine, the issuance of cease-and-desist orders or the suspension or expulsion of a broker-dealer from
registration or membership. The requirements imposed by our regulators are designed to ensure the integrity of the
financial markets and to protect customers and other third parties who deal with us and are not designed to protect
our stockholders. Consequently, these regulations often serve to limit our activities, including through net capital,
customer protection and market conduct requirements.
We face the risk of significant intervention by regulatory authorities, including extended investigation and
surveillance activity, adoption of costly or restrictive new regulations and judicial or administrative proceedings that
may result in substantial penalties. Among other things, we could be fined or be prohibited from engaging in some
of our business activities. In addition, the regulatory environment in which we operate is subject to modification and
further regulation. Such changes may increase the expenses that we incur without necessarily leading to
commensurate increases in revenue and income. Certain laws and regulations within the U.S. and externally include
extraterritorial application that may lead to overlapping or conflicting legal and regulatory burdens with additional
risks and implementation expenses. New laws or regulations or changes in the enforcement of existing laws or
regulations applicable to us and our clients also may adversely affect our business, and our ability to function in this
environment will depend on our ability to constantly monitor and react to these changes.
The U.S. and other governments and institutions have taken actions, and may in the future take further actions,
in response to disruption and volatility in the global financial markets. Such further actions could include expanding
current or enacting new standards, requirements and rules that may be applicable to us and our subsidiaries. The
effect of any such expanded or new standards, requirements and rules is uncertain and could have adverse
consequences to our business, financial condition and results of operations. While we continue to examine the
requirements of new regulations that may become applicable to us in the U.S. and in the European Union (see
“Business—Regulation”), and previously announced actual or potential regulations that may be modified, we are not
able to predict the ultimate effect on us.
The regulatory environment in which our clients operate may also impact our business. For example, changes
in antitrust laws or the enforcement of antitrust laws could affect the level of M&A activity and changes in state
laws may limit investment activities of state pension plans. In addition, many tax laws and regulations have been
modified, or are otherwise under review, in the U.S. and in many other jurisdictions in which we and our clients
operate. Actual and proposed changes to these laws and regulations may affect the level of M&A activity, including
cross-border M&A activity.
For asset management businesses in general, there have been a number of highly publicized cases involving
fraud or other misconduct by employees of asset management firms, as well as industry-wide regulatory inquiries.
These cases and inquiries have resulted in increased scrutiny in the industry and may result in new rules and
regulations for mutual funds, hedge funds, private equity funds and their investment managers. This regulatory
scrutiny and these rulemaking initiatives may result in an increase in operational and compliance costs or the risk of
assessment of significant fines or penalties against our Asset Management business, and may otherwise limit our
ability to engage in certain activities.
Specific regulatory changes also may have a direct impact on the revenue of our Asset Management business.
In addition to regulatory scrutiny and potential fines and sanctions, regulators continue to examine different aspects
of the asset management industry. For example, the use of “soft dollars,” where a portion of commissions paid to
broker-dealers in connection with the execution of client trades also pays for research and other eligible services that
are used by investment advisors, is being reexamined by different regulatory bodies and industry participants.
Although a substantial portion of the research relied on by our Asset Management business in its investment
decision-making processes is generated internally by our investment personnel, external research, including external
research and other eligible services traditionally paid for with soft dollars, is also important to the process. This
20
external research includes materials provided by broker-dealers and research firms, as well as eligible data and
analytics services from various sources. In connection with the implementation of the EU Markets in Financial
Instruments Directive II (“MiFID II”) in 2018, our Asset Management affiliates in Germany and the U.K. decided to
pay for broker research services from their own resources. The ultimate impact of MiFID II and potential similar,
future regulatory changes on our Asset Management business and on the financial industry as a whole remains
uncertain, although it has reduced our ability to utilize commissions to pay for research services and other soft dollar
services in certain European jurisdictions. Similar pressures may come from changes in the asset management
industry itself, which may further increase our costs related to external research services. For the year ended
December 31, 2018, our Asset Management business obtained research and other eligible services through third-
party soft dollar arrangements, the total value of which we estimate to be approximately $30 million.
In addition, new regulations affecting the asset management business, including those regarding the
management of U.S. mutual funds, hedge funds, UCITs funds and the use of certain investment products may
impact our Asset Management business and result in increased costs. For example, the European Union has adopted
updated directives on the coordination of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to undertakings for
collective investment in transferable securities (“UCITS V”) with respect to various subjects. Among other things,
UCITS V establishes remunerations policies which impact the structure of compensation for certain portfolio
managers and other personnel within the Company. UCITS V also establishes certain regulations governing
oversight and independence of depository functions. While these rules have already been implemented, they could
further impact our personnel or result in changes to our operations, resulting in increased costs to the business. In
addition, many regulators around the world, including those in the U.S., continue to adopt disclosure requirements
impacting the asset management business, as well as changes to the laws, rules and regulations relating to
recordkeeping and reporting obligations.
Legislators and regulators around the world continue to explore changes to, and additional oversight of, the
financial industry generally. The impact of the potential changes on us are uncertain and may result in an increase in
costs or a reduction of revenue associated with our businesses.
See “Business—Regulation” above for a further discussion of the regulatory environment in which we
conduct our businesses.
The financial services industry faces substantial litigation and regulatory risks, and we may face
damage to our professional reputation and legal liability if our services are not regarded as satisfactory or if
conflicts of interest should arise.
As a financial services firm, we depend to a large extent on our relationships with our clients and our
reputation for integrity and high-caliber professional services to attract and retain clients. As a result, if a client is
not satisfied with our services, such dissatisfaction may be more damaging to our business than to other types of
businesses. Moreover, our role as advisor to our clients on important transactions involves complex analysis and the
exercise of professional judgment, including, if appropriate, rendering “fairness opinions” in connection with
mergers and other transactions. Our role as advisor to our sovereign and government clients in particular may
occasionally result in increased publicity of our involvement with, and our advice to, such clients.
In recent years, the volume of claims and amount of damages claimed in litigation and regulatory proceedings
against financial advisors has been increasing. The activities of our Financial Advisory business may subject us to
the risk of significant legal actions by our clients and third parties, including our clients’ stockholders, under
securities or other laws. Such legal actions may include allegations relating to aiding and abetting breaches of
fiduciary duties and to materially false or misleading statements made in connection with securities and other
transactions. We may also be exposed to potential liability for the fairness opinions and other advice provided to
participants in corporate transactions. In our Asset Management business, we make investment decisions on behalf
of our clients which could result in substantial losses. Many of our business activities may subject us to the risk of
legal actions alleging negligence, misconduct, breach of fiduciary duty or breach of contract.
We increasingly confront actual and potential conflicts of interest relating to our Financial Advisory business,
as well as to the fact that we have both a Financial Advisory business and an Asset Management business. It is
possible that actual, potential or perceived conflicts of interest could give rise to client dissatisfaction, litigation or
regulatory enforcement actions, which could have the effect of limiting our business opportunities. Appropriately
21
identifying and managing actual or perceived conflicts of interest is complex and difficult, and our reputation could
be damaged if we fail, or appear to fail, to deal appropriately with one or more potential or actual conflicts of
interest. We have adopted various policies, controls and procedures to address or limit actual or perceived conflicts
of interest. However, these policies, controls and procedures may not be adhered to by our employees or be effective
in reducing the applicable risks. Any failure of, or failure to adhere to, these policies, controls and procedures may
result in regulatory sanctions or client litigation. We may also face competition from time to time from other
financial services firms that do not operate under similar policies, controls and procedures.
Our Financial Advisory engagements typically include broad indemnities from our clients and provisions
designed to limit our exposure to legal claims relating to our services, but these provisions may not protect us or
may not be available or adhered to in all cases. We also are subject to claims arising from disputes with employees
for alleged wrongful termination, discrimination or harassment, among other things. These risks often may be
difficult to assess or quantify, and their existence and magnitude often remain unknown for substantial periods of
time.
We may incur significant legal expenses in defending against litigation or regulatory action against us.
Substantial legal liability or significant regulatory action against us could materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition or results of operations and cause significant reputational harm to us, which could seriously harm
our business.
Employee misconduct, which is difficult to detect and deter, could harm us by impairing our ability to
attract and retain clients and subjecting us to significant legal liability and reputational harm.
There have been a number of highly publicized cases involving fraud or other misconduct by employees in the
financial services industry generally, and we run the risk that employee misconduct could occur in our business as
well. For example, misconduct by employees could involve the improper use or disclosure of confidential
information, which could result in legal action, regulatory sanctions and reputational or financial harm. Our
Financial Advisory business often requires that we deal with confidences of great significance to our clients or their
counterparties, improper use of which may harm our clients or our relationships with our clients. Any breach of
confidences as a result of employee misconduct may adversely affect our reputation, impair our ability to attract and
retain Financial Advisory clients and subject us to liability. Similarly, in our Asset Management business, we have
authority over client assets, and we may, from time to time, have custody of such assets. In addition, we often have
discretion to trade client assets on the client’s behalf and must do so acting in the best interests of the client. As a
result, we are subject to a number of obligations and standards, and the violation of those obligations or standards
may adversely affect our clients and us. It is difficult to detect and deter employee misconduct, and the precautions
we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in all cases.
In recent years, the U.S. Department of Justice and the SEC have also devoted greater resources to the
enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. In addition, the United Kingdom, France and other jurisdictions
have expanded the reach of their anti-bribery laws. While we have developed and implemented policies and
procedures designed to ensure compliance with anti-bribery and other laws, such policies and procedures may not be
effective in all instances to prevent violations. Any determination that we have violated these laws could subject us
to, among other things, civil and criminal penalties, material fines, profit disgorgement, injunction against future
conduct, securities litigation and reputational damage, any one of which could adversely affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations.
A failure in or breach of our information systems or infrastructure, or those of third parties with which
we do business, including as a result of cyber attacks, could disrupt our businesses, lead to reputational harm
and legal liability or otherwise impact our ability to operate our business.
Our operations rely on the secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential and other information
involving our computer systems, hardware, software and networks, which we refer to as information systems, and
involving the information systems of third parties with which we do business. Such information systems, which
frequently include “cloud”-based networks and services, may be subject to unauthorized or fraudulent access,
computer viruses or other malicious code or other threats, including “phishing” attempts, that are constantly
evolving and that could have a security impact on us. There can be no assurance that we will not suffer material
22
losses relating to cyber attacks on, or other security breaches involving, our information systems, or the information
systems of third parties with which we do business, despite taking protective measures to prevent such breaches. The
increased use of mobile technologies can heighten these and other operational risks. If a successful cyber attack or
other security breach were to occur, our confidential or proprietary information, or the confidential or proprietary
information of our clients or their counterparties, that is stored in, or transmitted through, such information systems
could be compromised or misappropriated. Any such cyber attack or other security breach, or any disruption of or
failure in the physical or logical infrastructure or operating systems that support such information systems or our
businesses, could significantly impact our ability to operate our businesses and could result in reputational damage,
legal liability, the loss of clients or business opportunities and financial losses that are either not insured against or
not fully covered through any insurance maintained by us. As cyber threats continue to multiply, become more
sophisticated and threaten additional aspects of our businesses, we may also be required to expend additional
resources on information security and compliance costs in order to continue to modify or enhance our protective
measures or to investigate and remediate any information security vulnerabilities or other exposures.
Other operational risks may disrupt our businesses, result in regulatory action against us or limit our
growth.
Our business is highly dependent on communications and information systems, including those of our
vendors. Any failure or interruption of these systems, whether caused by fire, other natural disaster, power or
telecommunications failure, act of terrorism or war, system modification or upgrade, or otherwise, could materially
adversely affect our business. Although back-up systems are in place, our back-up procedures and capabilities in the
event of a failure or interruption may not be adequate.
Particularly in our Asset Management business, we rely heavily on our financial, accounting, trading,
compliance and other data processing systems, and those of our third party vendors or service providers who support
these functions. We expect that we will need to review whether to continue to upgrade and expand the capabilities of
these systems in the future to avoid disruption of, or constraints on, our operations, and any such system upgrades or
expansions could result in significant costs to us. Certain investment teams within our Asset Management business
employ proprietary systems, including quantitative models, in connection with their investment processes. These
systems and models are often designed and, with assistance from technology personnel, maintained by employees
who are members of those investment teams. If any of the foregoing systems fail to operate properly or are disabled,
including for reasons beyond our control, we could suffer financial loss, a disruption of our businesses, liability to
clients, regulatory intervention or reputational damage. The inability of our systems (or those of our vendors or
service providers) to accommodate an increasing volume of transactions also could constrain our ability to expand
our businesses. In addition, errors resulting from these issues or from human error when conducting a trade or other
transaction could expose us to significant risk.
In addition, if we were to experience a local or regional disaster or other business continuity problem, such as
a pandemic or other man-made or natural disaster, our continued success will depend, in part, on the availability of
our personnel and office facilities and the proper functioning of our computer, telecommunications, transaction
processing and other information systems and operations, as well as those of third parties on whom we rely. Such
events could lead us to experience operational challenges, and our inability to successfully recover could materially
disrupt our businesses and cause material financial loss, regulatory actions, reputational harm or legal liability.
For additional information regarding operational risks with respect to our businesses, see “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Operational Risk” below.
The soundness of third parties, including our clients, as well as financial, governmental and other
institutions, could adversely affect us.
We have exposure to many different industries, institutions, products and counterparties, and we routinely
execute transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including brokers and dealers, commercial
banks, investment banks, mutual and hedge funds and other institutions. Many of these transactions expose us to
credit risk in the event of default of our counterparty or client. In addition, our credit and settlement risk may be
exacerbated when the collateral held by us, if any, cannot be fully realized or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to
recover the full amount of the loan or derivative exposure due to us.
23
Failure to maintain effective internal controls in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
could materially adversely affect our business.
We have documented and tested our internal control procedures in order to satisfy the requirements of
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our
internal controls over financial reporting and a report by our independent auditors regarding our internal control over
financial reporting. We are in compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act as of December 31, 2018.
However, if we fail to maintain the adequacy of our internal controls, as such standards are modified, supplemented
or amended from time to time, we may not be able to ensure that we can conclude on an ongoing basis that we have
effective internal controls over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Failure to maintain an effective internal control environment could materially adversely affect our business.
We may pursue acquisitions, joint ventures, cooperation agreements or other growth or geographic
expansion strategies that may result in additional risks and uncertainties in our business and could present
unforeseen integration obstacles or costs.
We routinely assess our strategic position and may in the future seek acquisitions or other transactions or
growth strategies to further enhance our competitive position. We have in the past pursued joint ventures and other
transactions aimed at expanding the geography and scope of our operations. We expect to continue to explore
acquisitions, growth strategies and partnership or strategic alliance opportunities that we believe to be attractive.
Acquisitions, growth strategies and joint ventures involve a number of risks and present financial, managerial
and operational challenges. These risks and challenges include potential disruption of our ongoing business and
distraction of management, difficulty integrating personnel and financial and other systems, difficulty hiring
additional management and other critical personnel, and other challenges arising from the increased scope,
geographic diversity and complexity of our operations.
To the extent that we pursue business opportunities outside of the United States and our other principal
business locations, including through acquisitions, joint ventures or other geographic expansion of our existing
businesses, we may become subject to political, economic, legal, operational, regulatory and other risks that are
inherent in operating in a foreign country, including risks of potential price, capital and currency exchange controls,
licensing requirements and other regulatory restrictions, as well as the risk of hostile actions against or affecting our
business or people. Our ability to remain in compliance with local laws in a particular foreign jurisdiction could
adversely affect our businesses and our reputation.
In addition, our clients and other stakeholders may react unfavorably to our acquisition, growth and joint
venture strategies, we may not realize any anticipated benefits from such strategies, we may be exposed to additional
liabilities of any acquired business or joint venture, we may be exposed to litigation in connection with an
acquisition, growth or joint venture transaction, and we may not be able to renew on similar terms (or at all)
previously successful joint ventures or similar arrangements, any of which could materially adversely affect our
revenue, financial position and results of operations.
An inability to access the debt and equity capital markets as a result of our debt obligations, credit
ratings or other factors could impair our liquidity, increase our borrowing costs or otherwise adversely affect
our financial position or results of operations.
As of December 31, 2018, Lazard Group and its subsidiaries had approximately $1.5 billion in debt
outstanding, of which $250 million, $400 million, $300 million and $500 million relate to Lazard Group senior
notes that mature in 2020, 2025, 2027 and 2028, respectively. This debt has certain mandated payment obligations,
which may constrain our ability to operate our business. If we decide to redeem or retire this debt before maturity,
we may be required to pay a significant premium to do so, which may adversely impact our earnings and affect our
financial position. In addition, in the future we may need to incur debt or issue equity in order to fund our working
capital requirements or refinance existing indebtedness, as well as to make acquisitions and other investments. The
amount of our debt obligations may impair our ability to raise debt or issue equity for financing purposes. Our
access to funds also may be impaired if regulatory authorities take significant action against us or for a variety of
other possible reasons. In addition, our borrowing costs and our access to the debt capital markets depend
24
significantly on our credit ratings. These ratings are assigned by rating agencies, which may reduce or withdraw
their ratings or place us on “credit watch” with negative implications at any time.
Lazard Ltd is a holding company and, accordingly, depends upon distributions from Lazard Group to
pay dividends and taxes and other expenses.
Lazard Ltd is a holding company and has no independent means of generating significant revenue. We control
Lazard Group through our indirect control of both of the managing members of Lazard Group. Our subsidiaries
incur income taxes on net taxable income of Lazard Group in their respective tax jurisdictions. We intend to
continue to cause Lazard Group to make distributions to our subsidiaries in an amount sufficient to cover all
applicable taxes payable by us and dividends, if any, declared by us. To the extent that our subsidiaries need funds to
pay taxes on their share of Lazard Group’s net taxable income, or if Lazard Ltd needs funds for any other purpose,
and Lazard Group is restricted from making such distributions under applicable law or regulation, or is otherwise
unable to provide such funds, it could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of
operations.
Lazard Group is a holding company and therefore depends on its subsidiaries to make distributions to
Lazard Group to enable it to service its obligations under its indebtedness.
Lazard Group depends on its subsidiaries, which conduct the operations of its businesses, for distributions,
dividends and other payments to generate the funds necessary to meet its financial obligations, including payments
of principal and interest on its indebtedness. However, none of Lazard Group’s subsidiaries is obligated to make
funds available to it for servicing such financial obligations, and the group of entities that constitute Lazard Group’s
subsidiaries may change over time. The earnings from, or other available assets of, Lazard Group’s subsidiaries may
not be sufficient to pay dividends or make distributions or loans to enable Lazard Group to make payments with
respect to its financial obligations when such payments are due. In addition, even if such earnings were sufficient,
the agreements governing the current and future obligations of Lazard Group’s subsidiaries, regulatory requirements
with respect to our broker-dealer and other regulated subsidiaries, foreign exchange controls and a variety of other
factors may impede our subsidiaries’ ability to provide Lazard Group with sufficient dividends, distributions or
loans to fund its financial obligations, when due.
In the event of a change or adverse interpretation of relevant income tax law, regulation or treaty, or a
failure to qualify for treaty benefits, our overall tax rate may be substantially higher than the rate used for
purposes of our consolidated financial statements.
Our effective tax rate is based upon the application of currently applicable income tax laws, regulations and
treaties, and current judicial and administrative interpretations of those income tax laws, regulations and treaties, and
upon our non-U.S. subsidiaries’ ability to qualify for benefits, including reduced withholding tax rates, among other
things, under those treaties, and that a portion of their income is not subject to U.S. tax as effectively connected
income. Those income tax laws, regulations and treaties, and the administrative and judicial interpretations of them,
are subject to change at any time, and any such change may be retroactive.
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) was enacted. The Tax Act significantly
revised the U.S. corporate income tax system by, among other changes, lowering the corporate income tax rate from
35% to 21%, implementing a partial territorial tax system and imposing a one-time repatriation tax on the deemed
repatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries. The Tax Act also included several provisions that limited the benefit of
the tax rate reduction, such as restricting the deductibility of interest expense and other corporate business expenses.
The international tax provisions of the Tax Act are complex and the ultimate impact on us of the international
provisions, such as the base erosion and anti-abuse tax (“BEAT”), the tax on global intangible low-taxed income
(“GILTI”) and the other provisions of the Tax Act is uncertain. Although clarifying guidance and proposed
regulations were issued by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) in 2018, further guidance and the finalization
of those regulations is expected in the near term and any changes to our understanding of the Tax Act could
adversely affect us. In addition, if we were to convert into a U.S. corporation, we could be subject to additional U.S.
25
taxes, and future payments required under our tax receivable agreement could be accelerated, both of which could
reduce the amount of our cash available for distribution or reinvestment.
In addition, the eligibility of our non-U.S. subsidiaries for treaty benefits generally depends upon, among
other things, at least 50% of the principal class of shares in such subsidiaries being “ultimately owned” by U.S.
citizens and persons who are “qualified residents” for purposes of the treaty. It is possible that this requirement may
not be met, and even if it is met, we may not be able to document that fact to the satisfaction of the IRS. If our non-
U.S. subsidiaries are not treated as eligible for treaty benefits, such subsidiaries will be subject to additional U.S.
taxes, including “branch profits tax” on their “effectively connected earnings and profits” (as determined for U.S.
federal income tax purposes) at a rate of 30% rather than a treaty rate of 5%.
U.S. and foreign governments, institutions (including the European Union and the Organization of
Economically Developed Countries) and tax officials have produced and continue to implement many laws,
regulations, and treaties that currently govern the taxation of multinational companies. Any implementation of, or
changes to, any such laws, regulations and treaties that impact us could materially adversely affect our business,
financial condition or results of operations.
Tax authorities may challenge our tax computations and classifications, our transfer pricing methods,
and our application of related policies and methods.
Our tax returns are subject to audit by federal, local and foreign tax authorities. These authorities may
successfully challenge certain tax positions or deductions taken by our subsidiaries. For example, tax authorities
may contest intercompany allocations of fee income, management charges or interest charges among affiliates in
different tax jurisdictions. While we believe that we have provided the appropriate required reserves (see Note 2 of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements), it is possible that a tax authority may disagree with all, or a portion, of
the tax benefits claimed. If a tax authority were to successfully challenge our positions, it could result in significant
additional tax costs or payments under the tax receivable agreement described below.
In addition, there are additional transfer pricing and standardized country by country reporting requirements
being implemented. Additional information from country by country reporting, certain local information sharing
arrangements, and other documentation held by tax authorities is expected to be subject to greater information
sharing arrangements and any challenges from tax authorities reviewing such information could adversely impact
our overall tax obligations or our business, financial condition or results of operations.
Uncertainty regarding the outcome of future arrangements between the European Union and the
United Kingdom may adversely affect our business.
The Company has a significant presence in many European Union countries, including the United Kingdom.
The U.K. is scheduled to depart the European Union on March 29, 2019. The U.K. Government and the European
Union are discussing a draft withdrawal agreement that would include transitional arrangements to apply following
the U.K.’s departure. If the withdrawal agreement is approved, the U.K. Government and the European Union would
then negotiate the details of future trading arrangements that would apply after the expiration of the transitional
arrangements. At the time that the U.K. leaves the European Union, the commercial, regulatory and legal
environment that would exist, and to which the Company’s U.K. operations would be subject, will be impacted by
the nature of the arrangements that are under negotiation and yet to be determined between the U.K and the
European Union. The details of these arrangements are hard to predict, and uncertainty regarding their outcome may
continue. The Company currently does not believe that any of the potential arrangements that are likely to be agreed
will have a material adverse impact on the Company’s business. These potential arrangements may, however, result
in certain changes in the way that we conduct our businesses, which could result in increased costs. In addition, the
fact that the U.K. is scheduled to leave the European Union and the uncertainty it has produced has impacted, and
may continue to impact, geopolitical perspectives and macroeconomic factors including interest rates, foreign
currency exchange rates and equity markets, and it has increased volatility in certain markets in which we operate. If
these conditions continue or if current conditions worsen, our businesses may be adversely affected, which may
impact our financial position and results of operations. See “Difficult market conditions can adversely affect our
business in many ways, including by reducing the volume of transactions involving our Financial Advisory business
26
and reducing the value or performance of the assets we manage in our Asset Management business, which, in each
case, could materially reduce our revenue or income and adversely affect our financial position” above.
Our subsidiaries may be required to make payments under the Amended and Restated Tax Receivable
Agreement. The IRS may challenge the tax benefits that give rise to such payments and, under certain
circumstances, our subsidiaries may have made or could make payments under the Amended and Restated
Tax Receivable Agreement in excess of our subsidiaries’ cash tax savings.
As further discussed in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations—Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Income Taxes” and Note 19 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements, the Second Amended and Restated Tax Receivable Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2015
(the “Amended and Restated Tax Receivable Agreement”), between Lazard and LTBP Trust, a Delaware statutory
trust (the “Trust”), provides for the payment by our subsidiaries to the Trust of a significant portion of the cash
savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax or franchise tax that we actually realize as a result of
certain tax benefits that are subject to the Amended and Restated Tax Receivable Agreement. Any amount paid by
our subsidiaries to the Trust will generally be distributed to the owners of the Trust, including certain of our
executive officers, in proportion to their beneficial interests in the Trust. If the IRS successfully challenges the tax
benefits described above, under certain circumstances, our subsidiaries may have made or could make payments
under the Amended and Restated Tax Receivable Agreement in excess of our subsidiaries’ cash tax savings.
27
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We have made statements under the captions “Business,” “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and in other sections of this Form 10-K that are
forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as
“may,” “might,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,”
“potential,” “target,” “goal” or “continue,” and the negative of these terms and other comparable terminology. These
forward-looking statements, which are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us,
may include projections of our future financial performance based on our growth strategies, business plans and
initiatives and anticipated trends in our business. These statements are only predictions based on our current
expectations and projections about future events. There are important factors that could cause our actual results,
level of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from the results, level of activity, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to,
the numerous risks and uncertainties outlined in “Risk Factors,” including the following:
•
•
•
•
•
•
a decline in general economic conditions or the global or regional financial markets;
a decline in our revenues, for example due to a decline in overall M&A activity, our share of the M&A
market or our AUM;
losses caused by financial or other problems experienced by third parties;
losses due to unidentified or unanticipated risks;
a lack of liquidity, i.e., ready access to funds, for use in our businesses; and
competitive pressure on our businesses and on our ability to retain and attract employees at current
compensation levels.
These risks and uncertainties are not exhaustive. Other sections of this Form 10-K describe additional factors
that could adversely affect our business and financial performance. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and
rapidly changing environment. New risks and uncertainties emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for our
management to predict all risks and uncertainties, nor can management assess the impact of all factors on our
business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially
from those contained in any forward-looking statements.
Although we believe the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot
guarantee future results, level of activity, performance or achievements. Moreover, neither we nor any other person
assumes responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of any of these forward-looking statements. You should not
rely upon forward-looking statements as predictions of future events. We are under no duty to update any of these
forward-looking statements after the date of this Form 10-K to conform our prior statements to actual results or
revised expectations and we do not intend to do so.
Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
financial goals, including ratios of compensation and benefits expense to operating revenue;
ability to deploy surplus cash through dividends, share repurchases and debt repurchases;
ability to offset stockholder dilution through share repurchases;
possible or assumed future results of operations and operating cash flows;
strategies and investment policies;
financing plans and the availability of short-term borrowing;
competitive position;
future acquisitions, including the consideration to be paid and the timing of consummation;
potential growth opportunities available to our businesses;
28
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
potential impact of investments in our technology infrastructure and data science capabilities;
recruitment and retention of our managing directors and employees;
potential levels of compensation expense, including awarded compensation and benefits expense and
adjusted compensation and benefits expense, and non-compensation expense;
potential operating performance, achievements, productivity improvements, efficiency and cost
reduction efforts;
likelihood of success and impact of litigation;
expected tax rates, including effective tax rates;
changes in interest and tax rates;
availability of certain tax benefits, including certain potential deductions;
potential impact of certain events or circumstances on our financial statements;
changes in foreign currency exchange rates;
expectations with respect to the economy, the securities markets, the market for mergers, acquisitions,
restructuring and other financial advisory activity, the market for asset management activity and other
macroeconomic, regional and industry trends;
effects of competition on our business; and
impact of new or future legislation and regulation, including tax laws and regulations, on our business.
The Company is committed to providing timely and accurate information to the investing public, consistent
with our legal and regulatory obligations. To that end, the Company uses its website, its twitter account
(twitter.com/Lazard) and other social media sites to convey information about our businesses, including the
anticipated release of quarterly financial results, quarterly financial, statistical and business-related information, and
the posting of updates of AUM in our Asset Management business. Investors can link to Lazard Ltd, Lazard Group
and their operating company websites through http://www.lazard.com. Our websites and social media sites and the
information contained therein or connected thereto shall not be deemed to be incorporated into this Form 10-K.
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
There are no unresolved written comments that were received from the SEC staff 180 days or more before
December 31, 2018 relating to our periodic or current reports under the Exchange Act.
29
Item 2.
Properties
The following table lists the properties used for the entire Lazard organization as of December 31, 2018. As a
general matter, one or both of our Financial Advisory and Asset Management segments (as well as our Corporate
segment) uses the following properties. Our London and other offices sublease 71,207 and 7,071 square feet,
respectively, to third parties. We remain fully liable for the subleased space to the extent that the subtenants fail to
perform their obligations under the subleases for any reason.
Location
New York City.......................
Other Americas ......................
Paris........................................
London ...................................
Other EMEA ..........................
Asia Pacific ............................
Square Footage
446,524 square feet of
leased space
191,314 square feet of
leased space
148,502 square feet of
owned and leased space
144,448 square feet of
leased space
124,229 square feet of
leased space
68,331 square feet of
leased space
Principal office located at 30 Rockefeller Plaza
Offices
Bogota, Boston, Buenos Aires, Charlotte, Chicago,
Houston, Lima, Los Angeles, Mexico City,
Minneapolis, Montreal, Panama City, San
Francisco, Santiago, São Paulo and Toronto
Principal office located at 121 Boulevard
Haussmann
Principal office located at 50 Stratton Street
Amsterdam, Bordeaux, Brussels, Dubai, Dublin,
Frankfurt, Geneva, Hamburg, Lyon, Madrid,
Milan, Nantes, Riyadh, Stockholm and Zurich
Beijing, Hong Kong, Melbourne, Mumbai, Perth,
Seoul, Singapore, Sydney and Tokyo
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
The Company is involved from time to time in judicial, regulatory and arbitration proceedings and inquiries
concerning matters arising in connection with the conduct of our businesses, including proceedings initiated by
former employees alleging wrongful termination. The Company reviews such matters on a case-by-case basis and
establishes any required accrual if a loss is probable and the amount of such loss can be reasonably estimated. The
Company experiences significant variation in its revenue and earnings on a quarterly basis. Accordingly, the results
of any pending matter or matters could be significant when compared to the Company’s earnings in any particular
fiscal quarter. The Company believes, however, based on currently available information, that the results of any
pending matters, in the aggregate, will not have a material effect on its business or financial condition.
Item 4.
Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
30
Part II
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities
Our Class A common stock is traded on The New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “LAZ.”
As of February 1, 2019, there were approximately 24 holders of record of our Class A common stock. This
does not include the number of shareholders that hold shares in “street-name” through banks or broker-dealers.
On February 1, 2019, the last reported sales price for our Class A common stock on the New York Stock
Exchange was $40.40 per share.
Share Repurchases in the Fourth Quarter of 2018
The following table sets forth information regarding Lazard’s purchases of its Class A common stock on a
monthly basis during the fourth quarter of 2018. Share repurchases are recorded on a trade date basis.
Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased
Period
October 1 – October 31, 2018
Share Repurchase Program (1)...................................... 655,000 $
Employee Transactions (2)............................................
8,012 $
November 1 – November 30, 2018
Share Repurchase Program (1)...................................... 2,850,000 $
Employee Transactions (2)............................................
4,692 $
December 1 – December 31, 2018
Share Repurchase Program (1)...................................... 2,903,863 $
7,863 $
Employee Transactions (2)............................................
Total
Share Repurchase Program (1)...................................... 6,408,863 $
20,567 $
Employee Transactions (2)............................................
Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased
as Part of
Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs
Approximate
Dollar Value of
Shares that May
Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans or
Programs
655,000 $
513.9 million
2,850,000 $
400.7 million
2,903,863 $
295.5 million
6,408,863 $
295.5 million
Average
Price Paid
per Share
42.52
47.83
39.75
40.01
36.21
38.97
38.43
42.66
(1) During the year ended December 31, 2018 and since 2015, the Board of Directors of Lazard authorized the
repurchase of Class A common stock as set forth in the table below.
Repurchase
Authorization
Date
February 2015 .............................................................. $
January 2016 ................................................................ $
April 2016 .................................................................... $
November 2016............................................................ $
October 2017................................................................ $
April 2018 .................................................................... $
October 2018................................................................ $
150,000
200,000
113,182
236,000
200,000
300,000
300,000
Expiration
December 31, 2016
December 31, 2017
December 31, 2017
December 31, 2018
December 31, 2019
December 31, 2020
December 31, 2020
In addition, on February 4, 2019, the Board of Directors of Lazard authorized the repurchase of up to $300
million of additional shares of Class A common stock, which authorization will expire on December 31,
2020, bringing the total available share repurchase authorization as of February 4, 2019 to approximately $510
million.
31
A significant portion of the Company’s purchases under the share repurchase program are used to offset a
portion of the shares that have been or will be issued under Lazard Ltd’s 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan
(the” 2008 Plan”) and 2018 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2018 Plan”). Purchases under the share
repurchase program may be made in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. The rate at
which the Company purchases shares in connection with the share repurchase program may vary from quarter
to quarter due to a variety of factors. Amounts shown in this line item include repurchases of Class A common
stock and exclude the shares of Class A common stock withheld by the Company to meet the minimum
statutory tax withholding requirements as described below.
(2) Under the terms of the 2008 Plan and the 2018 Plan, upon the vesting of RSUs, PRSUs, deferred stock units
(“DSUs”) and delivery of restricted or other Class A common stock, shares of Class A common stock may be
withheld by the Company to meet the minimum statutory tax withholding requirements. During the three
month period ended December 31, 2018, the Company satisfied such obligations in lieu of issuing (i) 10,616
shares of Class A common stock upon the vesting or settlement of 102,859 RSUs and PRSUs and (ii) 9,951
shares of Class A common stock upon the vesting of 21,809 shares of restricted Class A common stock.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company had in place trading plans under Rule 10b5-1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), pursuant to which it effected stock repurchases
in the open market.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
See Item 12, “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters—Equity Compensation Plan Information.”
Stock Performance
The stock performance graph below compares the performance of an investment in our Class A common
stock, from December 31, 2013 through December 31, 2018, with that of the S&P 500 Index and the S&P Financial
Index. The graph assumes $100 was invested at the close of business on December 31, 2013 in each of our Class A
common stock, the S&P 500 Index and the S&P Financial Index. It also assumes that dividends were reinvested on
the date of payment without payment of any commissions. The performance shown in the graph represents past
performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance.
Lazard Ltd
S&P Financial Index
S&P 500 Index
$250
$200
$150
$100
$50
$0
3
1
0
2
c
e
D
1
3
Other Matters
None.
4
1
0
2
c
e
D
1
3
5
1
0
2
c
e
D
1
3
6
1
0
2
c
e
D
0
3
7
1
0
2
c
e
D
9
2
8
1
0
2
c
e
D
1
3
32
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data
The following table sets forth selected consolidated financial data for the Company for all years presented.
The consolidated statements of financial condition and operations data as of and for each of the years in the
five-year period ended December 31, 2018 have been derived from Lazard Ltd’s consolidated financial statements.
The audited consolidated statements of financial condition as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 and audited
consolidated statements of operations for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2018 are
included in this Form 10-K. The audited consolidated statements of financial condition as of December 31, 2016,
2015 and 2014, and the audited consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2015 and
2014, are not included in this Form 10-K. Historical results should not be considered an indication of results for any
future period.
The selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and the Company’s consolidated financial statements
and related notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
33
Selected Consolidated Financial Data
2018
As Of Or For The Year Ended December 31,
2016
(dollars in thousands, except for per share amounts)
2017
2015
2014
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data (a)
Net Revenue:
Financial Advisory ............................................... $
Asset Management (b) .........................................
Corporate (c) ........................................................
Net Revenue ...............................................................
Compensation and Benefits........................................
Other Operating Expenses (d)....................................
Total Operating Expenses ..........................................
Operating Income (Loss)............................................ $
Net Income ................................................................. $
Net Income Attributable to Lazard Ltd ...................... $
Net Income Per Share of
Class A Common Stock:
1,555,526 $
1,331,801
(60,975)
2,826,352
1,514,735
630,851
2,145,586
680,766 $
532,449 $
527,125 $
1,387,682 $
1,255,820
809
2,644,311
1,512,873
305,992
1,818,865
825,446 $
259,847 $
253,583 $
1,301,044 $
1,051,316
(18,989)
2,333,371
1,340,543
475,367
1,815,910
517,461 $
393,692 $
387,698 $
1,279,628 $
1,111,105
(37,125)
2,353,608
1,319,746
1,050,482
2,370,228
(16,620) $
992,932 $
986,373 $
1,206,734
1,134,595
(40,882)
2,300,447
1,313,606
467,376
1,780,982
519,465
434,063
427,277
Basic..................................................................... $
Diluted.................................................................. $
4.43 $
4.06 $
2.09 $
1.91 $
3.11 $
2.92 $
7.87 $
7.40 $
Dividends Declared Per Share of Class
A Common Stock.................................................... $
Consolidated Statements of Financial
Condition Data
Total Assets................................................................ $
Total Debt (e) ............................................................. $
Total Lazard Ltd Stockholders’ Equity...................... $
Total Stockholders’ Equity ........................................ $
Other Data
Assets Under Management:
3.49
3.20
1.20
3.03 $
2.81 $
2.69 $
2.35 $
4,997,241 $
1,434,260 $
916,851 $
970,093 $
4,928,677 $
1,190,444 $
1,199,803 $
1,258,905 $
4,556,508 $
1,195,805 $
1,235,987 $
1,293,813 $
4,477,774 $
998,386 $
1,313,455 $
1,367,306 $
3,325,329
1,053,458
706,744
770,057
As of December 31 .............................................. $214,734,000 $249,459,000 $197,910,000 $186,380,000 $197,103,000
Average During Year ........................................... $241,247,000 $226,525,000 $194,808,000 $195,987,000 $196,037,000
2,996
2,523
Total Headcount, As of December 31........................
2,610
2,781
2,843
Notes (in thousands of dollars):
(a) Net revenue and other operating expenses data for the year ended December 31, 2018 are not comparable to
the prior periods due to the adoption of the new revenue recognition guidance on January 1, 2018 (see Note 3
of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).
(b) Asset Management net revenue consists of the following:
2018
Management Fees and Other .............................................. $ 1,311,286 $ 1,210,016 $ 1,035,726 $ 1,086,030 $ 1,082,729
51,866
Incentive Fees .....................................................................
Asset Management Net Revenue.................................. $ 1,331,801 $ 1,255,820 $ 1,051,316 $ 1,111,105 $ 1,134,595
45,804
25,075
15,590
20,515
2014
For The Year Ended December 31,
2015
2016
2017
(c)
(d)
“Corporate” includes interest expense (net of interest income) and investment income (losses) from certain
investments.
Includes (i) in 2018, non-compensation costs of $27,495 relating to expenses associated with the Enterprise
Resource Planning system implementation; $2,345 of incremental rent expense relating to office space
reorganization; $120,995 of certain distribution fees and reimbursable deal costs paid to third parties and bad
debt expense, which represents fees that are deemed uncollectible; $10,000 relating to expenses associated
with an unconditional commitment to the Lazard Foundation (see Note 19 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements); $6,495 relating to the benefit pursuant to the tax receivable agreement (see Note 19 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements); and $6,523 relating to the partial redemption of the Company’s 4.25%
senior notes maturing on November 14, 2020 (see Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements), (ii)
in 2017, non-compensation costs of $25,308 relating to expenses associated with the Enterprise Resource
34
Planning system implementation; $11,354 of incremental rent expense and lease abandonment costs relating
to office space reorganization; and $202,546 relating to the benefit pursuant to the tax receivable agreement
(see Note 19 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements), (iii) in 2016, non-compensation costs of $30,067
due to the change in fair value of the contingent consideration associated with the Edgewater business
acquisition, (iv) in 2015, non-compensation costs of $547,691 relating to the provision pursuant to the tax
receivable agreement; $60,219 relating to the redemption of a significant portion of the Company’s 6.85%
senior notes maturing on June 15, 2017 and $1,114 of expenses relating to the partial extinguishment of the
tax receivable obligation and (v) in 2014, non-compensation costs of $18,307 relating to the provision
pursuant to tax receivable agreement.
Represents the aggregate amount reflected in the Company’s consolidated statements of financial condition
relating to senior debt and capital lease obligations.
(e)
35
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with Lazard Ltd’s consolidated financial statements
and the related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Form 10-K”). This discussion
contains forward-looking statements that are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties. Actual results
and the timing of events may differ significantly from those expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements
due to a number of factors, including those set forth in the sections entitled “Risk Factors” and “Special Note
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” and elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Business Summary
Lazard is one of the world’s preeminent financial advisory and asset management firms. We have long
specialized in crafting solutions to the complex financial and strategic challenges of a diverse set of clients around
the world, including corporations, governments, institutions, partnerships and individuals. Founded in 1848 in New
Orleans, we currently operate from 43 cities in key business and financial centers across 27 countries throughout
North America, Europe, Asia, Australia, the Middle East, and Central and South America.
Our primary business purpose is to serve our clients. Our deep roots in business centers around the world form
a global network of relationships with key decision-makers in corporations, governments and investing institutions.
This network is both a competitive strength and a powerful resource for Lazard and our clients. As a firm that
competes on the quality of our advice, we have two fundamental assets: our people and our reputation.
We operate in cyclical businesses across multiple geographies, industries and asset classes. In recent years, we
have expanded our geographic reach, bolstered our industry expertise and continued to build in growth areas.
Companies, government bodies and investors seek independent advice with a geographic perspective, deep
understanding of capital structure, informed research and knowledge of global, regional and local economic
conditions. We believe that our business model as an independent advisor will continue to create opportunities for us
to attract new clients and key personnel.
Our principal sources of revenue are derived from activities in the following business segments:
•
•
Financial Advisory, which offers corporate, partnership, institutional, government, sovereign and
individual clients across the globe a wide array of financial advisory services regarding mergers and
acquisitions (“M&A”), capital advisory, restructurings, shareholder advisory, sovereign advisory,
capital raising and other strategic advisory, and
Asset Management, which offers a broad range of global investment solutions and investment
management services in equity and fixed income strategies, asset allocation strategies, alternative
investments and private equity funds to corporations, public funds, sovereign entities, endowments and
foundations, labor funds, financial intermediaries and private clients.
In addition, we record selected other activities in our Corporate segment, including management of cash,
investments, deferred tax assets, outstanding indebtedness, certain contingent obligations, and assets and liabilities
associated with Lazard Group’s Paris-based subsidiary, Lazard Frères Banque SA (“LFB”).
Our consolidated net revenue was derived from the following segments:
Financial Advisory..............................................................
Asset Management..............................................................
Corporate ............................................................................
Total....................................................................................
55%
47
(2)
100%
52%
48
-
100%
56%
45
(1)
100%
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2018
36
We also invest our own capital from time to time, generally alongside capital of qualified institutional and
individual investors in alternative investments or private equity investments, and, since 2005, we have engaged in a
number of alternative investments and private equity activities, including, historically, investments through (i)
Edgewater, our Chicago-based private equity firm and (ii) a fund targeting significant noncontrolling-stake
investments in established private companies. We also make investments to seed our Asset Management strategies.
Business Environment and Outlook
Economic and global financial market conditions can materially affect our financial performance. As
described above, our principal sources of revenue are derived from activities in our Financial Advisory and Asset
Management business segments. As our Financial Advisory revenues are primarily dependent on the successful
completion of merger, acquisition, restructuring, capital raising or similar transactions, and our Asset Management
revenues are primarily driven by the levels of assets under management, weak economic and global financial market
conditions can result in a challenging business environment for M&A and capital-raising activity as well as our
Asset Management business, but may provide opportunities for our restructuring business.
On an ongoing basis, regional, macroeconomic and geopolitical factors, including trade policy and regional
tax and regulatory reform, may impact our business. The U.S. economy remains healthy. The European economy’s
growth rate has slowed, but it is still growing. Emerging markets as a group have experienced significant capital
markets volatility. Global borrowing costs remain low.
Our outlook with respect to our Financial Advisory and Asset Management businesses is described below.
•
•
Financial Advisory—The fundamentals for continued M&A activity appear to remain in place. We
believe our Financial Advisory business is in a strong competitive position as demand continues for
expert, independent strategic advice that can be levered across geographies and our range of capabilities.
The global scale and breadth of our Financial Advisory business allows us to advise on large, complex
cross-border transactions and restructuring transactions across a variety of industries. In addition, we
believe our businesses throughout the emerging markets position us for growth in these markets, while
enhancing our relationships with, and the services that we can provide to, clients in other economies.
We continue to invest for growth in our Financial Advisory business and to hire talented senior
professionals selectively.
Asset Management—In the short to intermediate term, we expect most investor demand will come from
defined benefit and defined contribution plans in the developed economies because of their sheer scope
and size. Over the longer term, and depending upon local market conditions, we would expect an
increasing share of our AUM to come from the developing economies around the globe, as their
retirement systems evolve and individual wealth is increasingly deployed in the financial markets.
Given our diversified investment platform and our ability to provide investment solutions for a global
mix of clients, we believe we are positioned to benefit from growth that may occur in the asset
management industry. We are continually developing and seeding new investment strategies that extend
our existing platforms and assessing potential product acquisitions or other inorganic growth
opportunities. Recent examples of growth initiatives include the following investment strategies: various
Quantitative Equity strategies, various Multi-Asset strategies, an International Value strategy, a Global
Equity Franchise strategy, and a Market Neutral Quantitative Equity strategy.
We operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risks and uncertainties emerge
continuously, and it is not possible for our management to predict all risks and uncertainties, nor can we assess the
impact of all potentially applicable factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of
factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. See
Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in this Form 10-K. Furthermore, net income and revenue in any period may not be
indicative of full-year results or the results of any other period and may vary significantly from year to year and
quarter to quarter.
Overall, we continue to focus on the development of our business, including the generation of stable revenue
growth, earnings growth and shareholder returns, the evaluation of potential growth opportunities, the investment in
new technology to support the development of existing and new business opportunities, the prudent management of
our costs and expenses, the efficient use of our assets and the return of capital to our shareholders.
37
Certain data with respect to our Financial Advisory and Asset Management businesses is included below.
Financial Advisory
As reflected in the following table, which sets forth global M&A industry statistics, the value of all completed
transactions, including the subset of completed transactions involving values greater than $500 million, increased in
2018 as compared to 2017, whereas the number of completed transactions decreased in 2018 as compared to 2017.
With respect to announced M&A transactions, the value of all transactions, including the subset of announced
transactions involving values greater than $500 million, increased in 2018 as compared to 2017. Additionally, with
respect to announced M&A transactions, the number of all announced transactions decreased in 2018 as compared
to 2017, while the number of announced transactions involving values greater than $500 million increased in 2018
as compared to 2017.
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
($ in billions)
%
Incr / (Decr)
Completed M&A Transactions:
All deals:
Value....................................................................... $
Number ...................................................................
4,117 $
33,244
3,648
40,597
Deals Greater than $500 million:
Value....................................................................... $
Number ...................................................................
3,297 $
1,249
2,719
1,254
Announced M&A Transactions:
All deals:
Value....................................................................... $
Number ...................................................................
4,144 $
34,276
3,576
40,413
Deals Greater than $500 million:
Value....................................................................... $
Number ...................................................................
3,243 $
1,347
2,659
1,245
13%
(18)%
21%
(0)%
16%
(15)%
22%
8%
Source: Dealogic as of January 4, 2019.
Global restructuring activity during 2018, as measured by the number of corporate defaults, decreased as
compared to 2017. The number of defaulting issuers decreased to 77 in 2018, according to Moody’s Investors
Service, Inc., as compared to 104 in 2017.
Net revenue trends in Financial Advisory are generally correlated to the level of completed industry-wide
M&A transactions and restructuring transactions occurring subsequent to corporate debt defaults, respectively.
However, deviations from this relationship can occur in any given year for a number of reasons. For instance, our
results can diverge from industry-wide activity where there are material variances from the level of industry-wide
M&A activity in a particular market where Lazard has significant market share, or regarding the relative number of
our advisory engagements with respect to larger-sized transactions, and where we are involved in non-public or
sovereign advisory assignments. Beginning in the first quarter of 2018, we ceased separately reporting Restructuring
revenue within our Financial Advisory segment, because our Financial Advisory practices have become highly
integrated, and our assignments with clients often incorporate several disciplines. We believe that presenting unified
Financial Advisory revenue is a more accurate representation of our Financial Advisory business.
Asset Management
Equity market indices for major markets at December 31, 2018 generally decreased as compared to such
indices at December 31, 2017. Equity market indices for major markets at December 31, 2017 generally increased as
compared to such indices at December 31, 2016.
38
The percentage change in major equity market indices (i) at December 31, 2018, as compared to such indices
at December 31, 2017, and (ii) at December 31, 2017, as compared to such indices at December 31, 2016, is shown
in the table below.
Percentage Changes
December 31,
2018 vs. 2017
2017 vs. 2016
MSCI World Index ................................................................................
Euro Stoxx .............................................................................................
MSCI Emerging Market ........................................................................
S&P 500 .................................................................................................
(8)%
(11)%
(14)%
(4)%
23%
10%
38%
22%
The fees that we receive for providing investment management and advisory services are primarily driven
by the level of AUM and the nature of the AUM product mix. Accordingly, market movements, foreign currency
exchange rate volatility and changes in our AUM product mix will impact the level of revenues we receive from our
Asset Management business when comparing periodic results. A substantial portion of our AUM is invested in
equities. Movements in AUM during the period generally reflect the changes in equity market indices. Our AUM at
December 31, 2018 decreased 14% versus AUM at December 31, 2017, primarily due to market and foreign
exchange depreciation and net outflows. Average AUM for 2018 increased 6% as compared to average AUM in
2017.
Financial Statement Overview
Net Revenue
The majority of Lazard’s Financial Advisory net revenue historically has been earned from the successful
completion of M&A transactions, capital advisory services, capital raising, restructuring, shareholder advisory,
sovereign advisory and other strategic advisory matters. The main drivers of Financial Advisory net revenue are
overall M&A activity, the level of corporate debt defaults and the environment for capital raising activities,
particularly in the industries and geographic markets in which Lazard focuses. In some client engagements, often
those involving financially distressed companies, revenue is earned in the form of retainers and similar fees that are
contractually agreed upon with each client for each assignment and are not necessarily linked to the completion of a
transaction. In addition, Lazard also earns fees from providing strategic advice to clients, with such fees not being
dependent on a specific transaction, and may also earn fees in connection with public and private securities
offerings. Significant fluctuations in Financial Advisory net revenue can occur over the course of any given year,
because a significant portion of such net revenue is earned upon the successful completion of a transaction,
restructuring or capital raising activity, the timing of which is uncertain and is not subject to Lazard’s control.
Lazard’s Asset Management segment principally includes LAM, LFG and Edgewater. Asset Management net
revenue is derived from fees for investment management and advisory services provided to clients. As noted above,
the main driver of Asset Management net revenue is the level and product mix of AUM, which is generally
influenced by the performance of the global equity markets and, to a lesser extent, fixed income markets as well as
Lazard’s investment performance, which impacts its ability to successfully attract and retain assets. As a result,
fluctuations (including timing thereof) in financial markets and client asset inflows and outflows have a direct effect
on Asset Management net revenue and operating income. Asset Management fees are generally based on the level of
AUM measured daily, monthly or quarterly, and an increase or reduction in AUM, due to market price fluctuations,
currency fluctuations, changes in product mix, or net client asset flows will result in a corresponding increase or
decrease in management fees. The majority of our investment advisory contracts are generally terminable at any
time or on notice of 30 days or less. Institutional and individual clients, and firms with which we have strategic
alliances, can terminate their relationship with us, reduce the aggregate amount of AUM or shift their funds to other
types of accounts with different rate structures for a number of reasons, including investment performance, changes
in prevailing interest rates and financial market performance. In addition, as Lazard’s AUM includes significant
amounts of assets that are denominated in currencies other than U.S. Dollars, changes in the value of the U.S. Dollar
relative to foreign currencies will impact the value of Lazard’s AUM and the overall amount of management fees
generated by the AUM. Fees vary with the type of assets managed and the vehicle in which they are managed, with
39
higher fees earned on equity assets and alternative investment funds, such as hedge funds and private equity funds,
and lower fees earned on fixed income and cash management products.
The Company earns performance-based incentive fees on various investment products, including traditional
products and alternative investment funds, such as hedge funds and private equity funds.
For hedge funds, incentive fees are calculated based on a specified percentage of a fund’s net appreciation, in
some cases in excess of established benchmarks or thresholds. The Company records incentive fees on traditional
products and hedge funds at the end of the relevant performance measurement period, when potential uncertainties
regarding the ultimate realizable amounts have been determined. The incentive fee measurement period is generally
an annual period (unless an account terminates or redemption occurs during the year). The incentive fees received at
the end of the measurement period are not subject to reversal or payback. Incentive fees on hedge funds are often
subject to loss carryforward provisions in which losses incurred by the hedge funds in any year are applied against
certain gains realized by the hedge funds in future periods before any incentive fees can be earned.
For private equity funds, incentive fees may be earned in the form of a “carried interest” if profits arising from
realized investments exceed a specified threshold. Typically, such carried interest is ultimately calculated on a
whole-fund basis and, therefore, clawback of carried interest during the life of the fund can occur. As a result,
incentive fees earned on our private equity funds are not recognized until potential uncertainties regarding the
ultimate realizable amounts have been determined, including any potential for clawback.
Corporate segment net revenue consists primarily of investment gains and losses on the Company’s “seed
investments” related to our Asset Management business and principal investments in private equity funds, net of
hedging activities, as well as gains and losses on investments held in connection with Lazard Fund Interests (“LFI”)
and interest income and interest expense. Corporate net revenue also can fluctuate due to changes in the fair value of
equity securities and investments classified as “trading”, as well as due to changes in interest and currency exchange
rates and in the levels of cash, investments and indebtedness.
Although Corporate segment net revenue during 2018 is not significant compared to Lazard’s net revenue,
total assets in the Corporate segment represented 68% of Lazard’s consolidated total assets as of December 31,
2018, which are attributable to cash and cash equivalents, investments in debt and equity securities, interests in
alternative investment, debt, equity and private equity funds, deferred tax assets and certain assets associated with
LFB.
40
Operating Expenses
The majority of Lazard’s operating expenses relate to compensation and benefits for managing directors and
employees. Our compensation and benefits expense includes (i) salaries and benefits, (ii) amortization of the
relevant portion of previously granted deferred incentive compensation awards, including (a) share-based incentive
compensation under the Lazard Ltd 2018 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2018 Plan”) and the Lazard Ltd 2008
Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2008 Plan”), and (b) LFI and other similar deferred compensation arrangements
(see Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements), (iii) a provision for discretionary or guaranteed cash
bonuses and profit pools and (iv) when applicable, severance payments. Compensation expense in any given period
is dependent on many factors, including general economic and market conditions, our actual and forecasted
operating and financial performance, staffing levels, estimated forfeiture rates, competitive pay conditions and the
nature of revenues earned, as well as the mix between current and deferred compensation.
We believe that “awarded compensation and benefits expense” and the ratio of “awarded compensation and
benefits expense” to “operating revenue,” both non-GAAP measures, are the most appropriate measures to assess
the annual cost of compensation and provide the most meaningful basis for comparison of compensation and
benefits expense between present, historical and future years. “Awarded compensation and benefits expense” for a
given year is calculated using “adjusted compensation and benefits expense,” also a non-GAAP measure, as
modified by the following items:
•
•
•
we deduct amortization expense recorded for accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) purposes in the fiscal year associated with deferred incentive
compensation awards;
we add incentive compensation with respect to the fiscal year, which is comprised of:
(i)
(ii)
the deferred incentive compensation awards granted in the year-end compensation process with
respect to the fiscal year (e.g., deferred incentive compensation awards granted in 2019 related to
the 2018 year-end compensation process), including performance-based restricted stock unit
(“PRSU”) and performance-based profits interest participation right (“Performance PIPR”)
awards (based on the target payout level);
the portion of investments in people (e.g., “sign-on” bonuses or retention awards) and other
special deferred incentive compensation awards that is applicable to the fiscal year the award
becomes effective; and
(iii)
amounts in excess of the target payout level for PRSU and Performance PIPR awards at the end of
their respective performance periods; and
we reduce the amounts in (i), (ii) and (iii) above by an estimate of future forfeitures with respect to such
awards.
We also use “adjusted compensation and benefits expense” and the ratio of “adjusted compensation and
benefits expense” to “operating revenue,” both non-GAAP measures, for comparison of compensation and benefits
expense between periods. For the reconciliations and calculations with respect to “adjusted compensation and
benefits expense” and “awarded compensation and benefits expense” and related ratios to “operating revenue,” see
the table under “Consolidated Results of Operations” below.
Compensation and benefits expense is the largest component of our operating expenses. We seek to maintain
discipline with respect to compensation, including the rate at which we award deferred compensation. Our goal is to
maintain a ratio of awarded compensation and benefits expense to operating revenue and a ratio of adjusted
compensation and benefits expense to operating revenue over the cycle in the mid- to high-50s percentage range,
which compares to 55.8% and 55.1%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2018. While we have
implemented policies and initiatives that we believe will assist us in maintaining ratios within this range, there can
be no guarantee that we will continue to maintain such ratios, or that our policies or initiatives will not change in the
future. We may benefit from pressure on compensation costs within the financial services industry in future periods;
however, increased competition for senior professionals, changes in the macroeconomic environment or the
financial markets generally, lower operating revenue resulting from, for example, a decrease in M&A activity, our
41
share of the M&A market or our AUM levels, changes in the mix of revenues from our businesses, investments in
our businesses or various other factors could prevent us from achieving this goal.
Our operating expenses also include “non-compensation expense”, which includes costs for occupancy and
equipment, marketing and business development, technology and information services, professional services, fund
administration and outsourced services and other expenses. Our occupancy costs represent a significant portion of our
aggregate operating expenses and are subject to change from time to time, particularly as leases for real property expire
and are renewed or replaced with new, long-term leases for the same or other real property. In 2018, non-compensation
expense included expenses related to a partial redemption of the Company’s 4.25% senior notes due 2020 (the “2020
Notes”) and, in 2016, non-compensation expense included expenses related to the redemption of the Company’s 6.85%
senior notes due 2017 (the “2017 Notes”) (see Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements).
We believe that “adjusted non-compensation expense”, a non-GAAP measure, provides a more meaningful
basis for our investors to assess our operating results. For calculations with respect to “adjusted non-compensation
expense”, see the table under “Consolidated Results of Operations” below.
Our operating expenses also include our “benefit pursuant to the tax receivable agreement” (which, in 2017,
was offset by the charges described below relating to the Tax Act) and “amortization and other acquisition-related
(benefits) costs”, which includes the change in fair value of the contingent consideration associated with business
acquisitions and, in 2016, pertain primarily to the acquisition of Edgewater.
Provision for Income Taxes
Lazard Ltd, through its subsidiaries, is subject to U.S. federal income taxes on all of its U.S. operating income,
as well as on the portion of non-U.S. income attributable to its U.S. subsidiaries. In addition, Lazard Ltd, through its
subsidiaries, is subject to state and local taxes on its income apportioned to various state and local jurisdictions.
Outside the U.S., Lazard Group operates principally through subsidiary corporations that are subject to local income
taxes in foreign jurisdictions. Lazard Group is also subject to Unincorporated Business Tax (“UBT”) attributable to
its operations apportioned to New York City (see Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional information).
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) was enacted. The Tax Act significantly
revised the U.S. corporate income tax system by, among other changes, lowering the corporate income tax rate from
35% to 21%, implementing a partial territorial tax system and imposing a one-time repatriation tax on the deemed
repatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries. The Tax Act also included several provisions that limited the benefit of
the tax rate reduction, such as restricting the deductibility of interest expense and other corporate business expenses.
The Tax Act further included anti-base erosion provisions such as the BEAT and tax on GILTI. The GILTI
provisions impose a tax on certain income from foreign operations and we have elected to account for the tax on
GILTI as a current period expense.
See “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Income Taxes” below and Notes 17 and 19 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding income taxes, the impact of the Tax Act on
us, our deferred tax assets and the tax receivable agreement obligation.
Noncontrolling Interests
Noncontrolling interests primarily consist of amounts related to Edgewater’s management vehicles that the
Company is deemed to control but not own. See Note 14 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for
information regarding the Company’s noncontrolling interests.
Consolidated Results of Operations
Lazard’s consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. Dollars. Many of our non-U.S. subsidiaries
have a functional currency (i.e., the currency in which operational activities are primarily conducted) that is other
than the U.S. Dollar, generally the currency of the country in which the subsidiaries are domiciled. Such
subsidiaries’ assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. Dollars using exchange rates as of the respective balance
42
sheet date, while revenue and expenses are translated at average exchange rates during the respective periods based
on the daily closing exchange rates. Adjustments that result from translating amounts from a subsidiary’s functional
currency are reported as a component of stockholders’ equity. Foreign currency remeasurement gains and losses on
transactions in non-functional currencies are included in the consolidated statements of operations.
A portion of our net revenue is derived from transactions that are denominated in currencies other than the
U.S. Dollar. Net revenue for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was positively impacted by exchange
rate movements, in each case in comparison to the relevant prior year period. The majority of the impact to net
revenue, in both periods, was offset by the impact of the exchange rate movements on our operating expenses during
the years denominated in currencies other than the U.S. Dollar.
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP. Selected financial data
derived from the Company’s reported consolidated results of operations is set forth below, followed by a more
detailed discussion of both the consolidated and business segment results.
Net Revenue ..................................................................................... $ 2,826,352
Operating Expenses:
2018
2016
Year Ended December 31,
2017
($ in thousands)
$ 2,644,311
$ 2,333,371
Compensation and benefits.........................................................
Non-compensation ......................................................................
Amortization and other acquisition-related (benefits) costs .......
Benefit pursuant to tax receivable agreement.............................
Total operating expenses .......................................................
Operating Income............................................................................
Provision for income taxes .........................................................
Net Income.......................................................................................
Less - Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests..........
Net Income Attributable to Lazard Ltd........................................... $
Operating Income, as a % of net revenue ......................................
1,514,735
653,243
(15,897)
(6,495)
2,145,586
680,766
148,317
532,449
5,324
527,125
$
24.1%
1,512,873
499,024
9,514
(202,546)
1,818,865
825,446
565,599
259,847
6,264
253,583
$
31.2%
1,340,543
440,120
35,247
-
1,815,910
517,461
123,769
393,692
5,994
387,698
22.2%
The tables below describe the components of operating revenue, adjusted and awarded compensation and
benefits expense, adjusted non-compensation expense, earnings from operations and related key ratios, which are
non-GAAP measures used by the Company to manage its business. We believe such non-GAAP measures provide
the most meaningful basis for comparison between present, historical and future periods, as described above.
Operating Revenue:
Net revenue ....................................................................................... $
Adjustments:
Interest expense (a) ......................................................................
Distribution fees, reimbursable deal costs and bad debt
expense (b)................................................................................
Revenue related to noncontrolling interests (c) ...........................
Gain on acquisition of MBA Lazard (d)......................................
(Gains) losses on investments pertaining to LFI (e) ....................
Operating revenue ............................................................................. $
2018
Year Ended December 31,
2017
($ in thousands)
2016
2,826,352 $
2,644,311
$
2,333,371
54,126
49,983
47,568
(120,995)
(18,787)
-
14,086
2,754,782 $
-
(16,228)
-
(23,526)
$
2,654,540
-
(20,614)
(12,668)
(3,318)
2,344,339
(a)
Interest expense (excluding interest expense incurred by LFB) is added back in determining operating revenue
because such expense relates to corporate financing activities and is not considered to be a cost directly related
to the revenue of our business.
43
(b) Represents certain distribution fees and reimbursable deal costs paid to third parties for which an equal
amount is excluded from both operating revenue and non-compensation expense, respectively, and excludes
bad debt expense, which represents fees that are deemed uncollectible.
Revenue related to the consolidation of noncontrolling interests is excluded from operating revenue because
the Company has no economic interest in such amount.
(c)
(d) Represents a gain on the acquisition of MBA Lazard (which resulted from the increase in the fair value of the
(e)
Company’s investment in MBA Lazard prior to the acquisition).
Represents changes in the fair value of investments held in connection with LFI and other similar deferred
compensation arrangements for which a corresponding equal amount is excluded from compensation and
benefits expense.
2018
Year Ended December 31,
2017
($ in thousands)
2016
Compensation and Benefits Expense:
Total compensation and benefits expense ........................................ $ 1,514,735
Adjustments:
$ 1,512,873
$ 1,340,543
Noncontrolling interests (a) ........................................................
(Charges) credits pertaining to LFI (b) .......................................
Expenses associated with ERP system implementation (c)........
Adjusted compensation and benefits expense ..................................
Deduct - amortization of deferred incentive compensation
awards............................................................................................
Total adjusted cash compensation and benefits expense (d)............
Add:
(10,999)
14,086
(1,190)
1,516,632
(8,285)
(23,526)
-
1,481,062
(11,900)
(3,318)
-
1,325,325
(375,772)
1,140,860
(367,350)
1,113,712
(352,403)
972,922
Year-end deferred incentive compensation awards (e)...............
Sign-on and other special incentive awards (f)...........................
Deduct - adjustments for estimated forfeitures (g)...........................
Awarded compensation and benefits expense.................................. $ 1,536,953
Adjusted compensation and benefits expense, as
a % of operating revenue...............................................................
Awarded compensation and benefits expense, as
a % of operating revenue...............................................................
377,901
45,726
(27,534)
55.1%
55.8%
350,975
36,201
(25,166)
342,449
29,779
(27,917)
$ 1,317,233
$ 1,475,722
55.8%
56.5%
55.6%
56.2%
(a)
Expenses related to the consolidation of noncontrolling interests are excluded because Lazard has no
economic interest in such amounts.
(b) Represents changes in fair value of the compensation liability recorded in connection with LFI and other
similar deferred incentive compensation awards for which a corresponding equal amount is excluded from
operating revenue.
Represents expenses associated with the Enterprise Resource Planning (“ERP”) system implementation.
Includes base salaries and benefits of $695,398, $648,130 and $574,566 for 2018, 2017 and 2016,
respectively, and cash incentive compensation of $445,462, $465,582 and $398,356 for the respective years.
(c)
(d)
(e) Deferred incentive compensation awards applicable to the relevant year-end compensation process (e.g.,
deferred incentive compensation awards granted in 2019, 2018 and 2017 related to the 2018, 2017 and 2016
year-end compensation processes, respectively).
Represents special deferred incentive awards that are granted outside the year-end compensation process, and
includes grants to new hires, retention awards and performance units earned under PRSU grants.
(f)
44
(g) An estimate, based on historical experience and future expectations, for future forfeitures of the deferred
portion of such awards in order to present awarded compensation and benefits expense on a similar basis to
that under U.S. GAAP, which also considers estimated forfeitures.
Adjusted Non-Compensation Expense:
Total non-compensation expense ..................................................... $
Adjustments:
Expenses associated with ERP system implementation (a)........
Expenses relating to office space reorganization (b) ..................
Distribution fees, reimbursable deal costs and bad debt
expense (c) ...............................................................................
Charges pertaining to senior debt refinancing (d) ......................
Noncontrolling interests (e) ........................................................
Expenses associated with the Lazard Foundation (f)..................
Professional fees related to acquisitions .....................................
Adjusted non-compensation expense ............................................... $
Adjusted non-compensation expense, as
a % of operating revenue..............................................................
2018
Year Ended December 31,
2017
($ in thousands)
2016
653,243
$
499,024
$
440,120
(27,495)
(2,345)
(25,308)
(11,354)
-
-
(120,995)
(6,523)
(1,754)
(10,000)
-
484,131
$
-
-
(1,684)
-
-
460,678
$
-
(3,148)
(1,892)
-
(1,367)
433,713
17.6%
17.4%
18.5%
(a)
Represents expenses associated with the Enterprise Resource Planning (“ERP”) system implementation.
(b) Represents incremental rent expense and lease abandonment costs related to office space reorganization.
Represents certain distribution fees and reimbursable deal costs paid to third parties for which an equal
(c)
amount is excluded from both operating revenue and non-compensation expense, respectively, and excludes
bad debt expense, which represents fees that are deemed uncollectible.
(d) Represents excluded charges pertaining to (i) in 2018, the partial redemption of the Company’s 2020 Notes,
due to the non-operating nature of such transaction and (ii) in 2016, the redemption of the remaining balance
of the Company’s 2017 Notes, due to the non-operating nature of such transaction. See “—Liquidity and
Capital Resources—Financing Activities.”
Expenses related to the consolidation of noncontrolling interests are excluded because the Company has no
economic interest in such amounts.
Represents expenses associated with the unconditional commitment to the Lazard Foundation.
(e)
(f)
2018
Year Ended December 31,
2017
($ in thousands)
2016
Earnings From Operations:
Operating revenue ............................................................................ $ 2,754,782
Deduct:
$ 2,654,540
$ 2,344,339
Adjusted compensation and benefits expense ............................
Adjusted non-compensation expense..........................................
Earnings from operations ................................................................. $
Earnings from operations, as a % of operating revenue...................
(1,516,632)
(484,131)
$
754,019
27.4%
(1,481,062)
(460,678)
$
712,800
26.8%
(1,325,325)
(433,713)
585,301
25.0%
45
Headcount information is set forth below:
Headcount:
Managing Directors:
2018
As of December 31,
2017
2016
Financial Advisory.................................................................
Asset Management.................................................................
Corporate (a) ..........................................................................
Total Managing Directors ......................................................
Other Business Segment Professionals and Support Staff:
Financial Advisory.................................................................
Asset Management.................................................................
Corporate (a) ..........................................................................
Total .......................................................................................
166
102
17
285
1,312
1,014
385
2,996
152
96
22
270
1,180
806
587
2,843
149
92
20
261
1,161
804
555
2,781
(a)
Reduction in 2018 relates to a realignment of certain headcount from Corporate to the Financial Advisory and
Asset Management segments.
Operating Results
Year Ended December 31, 2018 versus December 31, 2017
The Company reported net income attributable to Lazard Ltd of $527 million, as compared to net income
attributable to Lazard Ltd of $254 million in 2017. The changes in the Company’s operating results during these
years are described below.
Net revenue increased $182 million, or 7%, with operating revenue increasing $100 million, or 4%, as
compared to 2017. Net revenue in the 2018 period reflects the adoption of the new revenue recognition guidance
(see Notes 3 and 4 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). Fee revenue from investment banking and other
advisory activities increased $169 million, or 12%, as compared to 2017, primarily due to an increase in M&A
Advisory revenue, partially offset by a decrease in Restructuring revenue. Asset management fees, including
incentive fees, increased $73 million, or 6%, as compared to 2017, primarily due to an increase in average AUM, as
well as the impact of the new revenue recognition guidance. In the aggregate, interest income, other revenue and
interest expense decreased $60 million as compared to 2017, primarily due to lower income attributable to
investments held in connection with LFI.
Compensation and benefits expense increased $2 million as compared to 2017.
Adjusted compensation and benefits expense was $1,517 million, an increase of $36 million, or 2%, as
compared to $1,481 million in 2017. The ratio of adjusted compensation and benefits expense to operating revenue
was 55.1% for 2018, as compared to 55.8% for 2017. Awarded compensation and benefits expense in 2018 was
$1,537 million, an increase of $61 million, or 4%, when compared to $1,476 million in 2017. The ratio of awarded
compensation and benefits expense to operating revenue was 55.8%, as compared to 55.6% for 2017. The year-end
deferred incentive compensation awarded for 2018 was $378 million, representing an increase of $27 million, or
8%, as compared to 2017. As described above, when analyzing compensation and benefits expense on a full-year
basis, we believe that awarded compensation and benefits expense provides the most meaningful basis for
comparison of compensation and benefits expense between present, historical and future years.
Non-compensation expense increased $154 million, or 31%, as compared to 2017, primarily due to the impact
of the new revenue recognition guidance discussed above, expenses associated with the unconditional commitment
to the Lazard Foundation and a charge relating to the redemption of a portion of the 2020 Notes in 2018. Adjusted
non-compensation expense, which excludes such items, as well as expenses associated with the ERP
implementation, costs related to office space reorganization and noncontrolling interests, increased $23 million, or
5%, as compared to 2017, reflecting our increased investments in the business, principally in our technology
46
infrastructure. The ratio of adjusted non-compensation expense to operating revenue was 17.6% for 2018, as
compared to 17.4% in 2017.
Amortization and other acquisition-related (benefits) costs reflect a benefit of $16 million in the 2018 period,
as compared to costs of $10 million in the 2017 period, primarily due to the change in fair market value of the
contingent consideration.
In 2017, the Tax Act reduced the U.S. corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, which required us to remeasure
the tax receivable agreement obligation. As a result of the change in the U.S. corporate tax rate, we reduced the tax
receivable agreement obligation by $203 million in the fourth quarter of 2017 and recorded a $203 million benefit
pursuant to the tax receivable agreement (see Note 19 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information).
Operating income decreased $145 million, or 18%, as compared to 2017. In 2017, operating income included
the significant benefit pursuant to the tax receivable agreement described above.
Earnings from operations increased $41 million, or 6%, as compared to 2017. Earnings from operations, as a
percentage of operating revenue, was 27.4%, as compared to 26.8% in 2017.
The provision for income taxes reflects an effective tax rate of 21.8%, as compared to 68.5% in 2017. The
decrease in the effective tax rate is primarily due to (i) the impact of the Tax Act and (ii) an increase in excess net
tax benefits related to share-based incentive compensation. As a result of the Tax Act in 2017, the Company
incurred a charge of approximately $420 million primarily relating to a reduction in deferred tax assets, which was
partially offset by the benefit pursuant to the tax receivable agreement described above. See Notes 17 and 19 of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and “Critical Accounting Policies—Income Taxes” below.
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests remained substantially unchanged as compared to 2017.
Year Ended December 31, 2017 versus December 31, 2016
The Company reported net income attributable to Lazard Ltd of $254 million, as compared to net income
attributable to Lazard Ltd of $388 million in 2016. The changes in the Company’s operating results during these
years are described below.
Net revenue increased $311 million, or 13%, with operating revenue increasing $310 million, or 13%, as
compared to 2016. Fee revenue from investment banking and other advisory activities increased $87 million, or 7%,
as compared to 2016, due to an increase in M&A Advisory and Restructuring revenue. Asset management fees,
including incentive fees, increased $197 million, or 20%, as compared to 2016, primarily due to an increase in
average AUM. In the aggregate, interest income, other revenue and interest expense increased $27 million, or 75%,
as compared to 2016, primarily due to gains in 2017 attributable to investments held in connection with LFI.
Compensation and benefits expense increased $172 million, or 13%, as compared to 2016, primarily
associated with increased operating revenue, charges pertaining to LFI and an increase in social charges.
Adjusted compensation and benefits expense (which excludes certain items and which we believe allows for
improved comparability between periods, as described above) was $1,481 million, an increase of $156 million, or
12%, as compared to $1,325 million in 2016. The ratio of adjusted compensation and benefits expense to operating
revenue was 55.8% for 2017, as compared to 56.5% for 2016. Awarded compensation and benefits expense in 2017
was $1,476 million, an increase of $159 million, or 12%, when compared to $1,317 million in 2016. The ratio of
awarded compensation and benefits expense to operating revenue was 55.6% and 56.2% for 2017 and 2016,
respectively. The year-end deferred incentive compensation awarded for 2017 was $351 million, representing an
increase of $9 million, or 2%, as compared to 2016. As described above, when analyzing compensation and benefits
expense on a full-year basis, we believe that awarded compensation and benefits expense provides the most
meaningful basis for comparison of compensation and benefits expense between present, historical and future years.
47
Non-compensation expense increased $59 million, or 13%, as compared to 2016, primarily due to expenses
associated with the ERP system implementation and expenses related to office space reorganization, as well as
higher mutual fund service fees related to growth in AUM and higher marketing and business development
expenses. Adjusted non-compensation expense, which excludes non-compensation costs related to the ERP system
implementation, office space reorganization and noncontrolling interests, increased $27 million, or 6%, as compared
to 2016. The ratio of adjusted non-compensation expense to operating revenue was 17.4% for 2017, as compared to
18.5% in 2016.
Amortization and other acquisition-related costs decreased $26 million as compared to 2016, primarily due to
the change in fair value of the contingent consideration in 2016 associated with the Edgewater business acquisition.
The contingent consideration associated with the Edgewater business acquisition was settled during 2016.
The Tax Act reduced the U.S. corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, which required us to remeasure the tax
receivable agreement obligation. As a result of the change in the U.S. corporate tax rate, we reduced the tax
receivable agreement obligation by $203 million in the fourth quarter of 2017 and recorded a $203 million benefit
pursuant to the tax receivable agreement (see Note 19 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information).
Operating income increased $308 million, or 60%, as compared to 2016. In 2017, operating income included
the benefit pursuant to the tax receivable agreement described above.
Earnings from operations increased $127 million, or 22%, as compared to 2016. Earnings from operations, as
a percentage of operating revenue, was 26.8%, as compared to 25.0% in 2016.
As a result of the Tax Act, the Company incurred a charge of approximately $420 million primarily relating to
the reduction in deferred tax assets, which was partially offset by the benefit pursuant to the tax receivable
agreement described above. Accordingly, the provision for income taxes reflects an effective tax rate of 68.5%, as
compared to 23.9% for 2016. The increase in the effective tax rate in 2017 reflects the impact of the Tax Act. See
Notes 17 and 19 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and “Critical Accounting Policies—Income Taxes”
below.
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests remained substantially unchanged as compared to 2016.
Business Segments
The following is a discussion of net revenue and operating income for the Company’s segments: Financial
Advisory, Asset Management and Corporate. Each segment’s operating expenses include (i) compensation and
benefits expenses that are incurred directly in support of the segment and (ii) other operating expenses, which
include directly incurred expenses for occupancy and equipment, marketing and business development, technology
and information services, professional services, fund administration and outsourcing, and indirect support costs
(including compensation and benefits expense and other operating expenses related thereto) for administrative
services. Such administrative services include, but are not limited to, accounting, tax, human resources, legal,
information technology, facilities management and senior management activities. Such support costs are allocated to
the relevant segments based on various statistical drivers such as revenue, headcount, square footage and other
factors.
48
Financial Advisory
The following table summarizes the reported operating results attributable to the Financial Advisory segment:
Net Revenue ..................................................................................... $ 1,555,526
1,198,807
Operating Expenses..........................................................................
356,719
Operating Income ............................................................................. $
Operating Income, as a % of net revenue.........................................
22.9%
2018
2016
Year Ended December 31,
2017
($ in thousands)
$ 1,387,682
1,143,586
244,096
$
$
17.6%
$ 1,301,044
1,017,055
283,989
21.8%
Certain Lazard fee and transaction statistics for the Financial Advisory segment are set forth below:
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2018
Lazard Statistics:
Number of clients with fees greater than $1 million:
Financial Advisory ......................................................................
287
304
276
Percentage of total Financial Advisory net revenue
from top 10 clients (a)....................................................................
Number of M&A transactions completed with
values greater than $500 million (b)..............................................
19%
22%
86
84
23%
92
(a) No individual client constituted more than 10% of our Financial Advisory segment net revenue in the years
ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.
Source: Dealogic as of January 4, 2019.
(b)
The geographical distribution of Financial Advisory net revenue is set forth below in percentage terms and is
based on the Lazard offices that generate Financial Advisory net revenue, which are located in the Americas
(primarily in the U.S. and Latin America), EMEA (primarily in the U.K., France, Germany, Italy and Spain) and the
Asia Pacific region (primarily in Australia) and therefore may not be reflective of the geography in which the clients
are located.
Americas ...........................................................................................
EMEA ...............................................................................................
Asia Pacific.......................................................................................
Total..................................................................................................
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2018
60%
36
4
100%
60%
36
4
100%
60%
37
3
100%
The Company’s managing directors and many of its professionals have significant experience, and many of
them are able to use this experience to advise on M&A, restructuring and other strategic advisory matters, depending
on clients’ needs. This flexibility allows Lazard to better match its professionals with the counter-cyclical business
cycles of mergers and acquisitions and restructurings. While Lazard measures revenue by practice area, Lazard does
not separately measure the costs or profitability of M&A services as compared to restructuring or other services.
Accordingly, Lazard measures performance in its Financial Advisory segment based on overall segment operating
revenue and operating income margins.
Financial Advisory Results of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2018 versus December 31, 2017
Financial Advisory net revenue increased $168 million, or 12%, as compared to 2017, which reflected an
increase in M&A Advisory revenue, partially offset by a decrease in Restructuring revenue. The increase in
49
Financial Advisory net revenue was primarily due to an increase in the number of completed transactions involving
fees greater than $5 million as compared to 2017.
Operating expenses increased $55 million, or 5%, as compared to 2017, primarily due to an increase in
compensation associated with increased revenue and the impact of the new revenue recognition guidance.
Financial Advisory operating income was $357 million, an increase of $113 million, or 46%, as compared to
operating income of $244 million in 2017 and, as a percentage of net revenue, was 22.9%, as compared to 17.6% in
2017.
Year Ended December 31, 2017 versus December 31, 2016
Financial Advisory net revenue increased $87 million, or 7%, as compared to 2016, which reflected an
increase in M&A Advisory revenue and Restructuring revenue. The increase in Financial Advisory net revenue was
primarily due to an increase in the number of completed transactions involving fees greater than $1 million as
compared to 2016.
Operating expenses increased $127 million, or 12%, as compared to 2016, primarily due to an increase in
compensation associated with increased revenue.
Financial Advisory operating income was $244 million, a decrease of $40 million, or 14%, as compared to
operating income of $284 million in 2016 and, as a percentage of net revenue, was 17.6%, as compared to 21.8% in
2016.
Asset Management
The following table shows the composition of AUM for the Asset Management segment (see Item 1,
“Business—Principal Business Lines—Asset Management—Investment Strategies”):
2018
As of December 31,
2017
($ in millions)
2016
AUM by Asset Class:
Equity:
Emerging Markets .......................................................................
Global ..........................................................................................
Local ............................................................................................
Multi-Regional.............................................................................
Total Equity............................................................................
$
Fixed Income:
Emerging Markets .......................................................................
Global ..........................................................................................
Local ............................................................................................
Multi-Regional.............................................................................
Total Fixed Income ................................................................
Alternative Investments..................................................................
Private Equity..................................................................................
Cash Management...........................................................................
Total AUM .............................................................................
$
41,899 $
41,490
36,020
57,589
176,998
14,980
4,851
6,113
6,994
32,938
2,430
1,469
899
214,734 $
52,349
43,663
42,650
70,696
209,358
17,320
4,109
4,497
9,154
35,080
2,846
1,478
697
249,459
$
$
41,363
30,567
36,243
54,668
162,841
15,580
3,483
4,245
7,847
31,155
2,422
1,253
239
197,910
Total AUM at December 31, 2018 was $215 billion, a decrease of $34 billion, or 14%, as compared to total
AUM of $249 billion at December 31, 2017, due to market depreciation, foreign exchange depreciation and net
outflows. Average AUM for the year ended December 31, 2018 increased $15 billion, or 6%, as compared to 2017.
50
As of both December 31, 2018 and 2017, approximately 88% of our AUM was managed on behalf of
institutional clients, including corporations, labor unions, public pension funds, insurance companies and banks, and
through sub-advisory relationships, mutual fund sponsors, broker-dealers and registered advisors. As of both
December 31, 2018 and 2017, approximately 12% of our AUM was managed on behalf of individual client
relationships, which are principally with family offices and individuals.
As of December 31, 2018, AUM with foreign currency exposure represented approximately 70% of our total
AUM, as compared to 74% at December 31, 2017. AUM with foreign currency exposure generally declines in value
with the strengthening of the U.S. Dollar and increases in value as the U.S. Dollar weakens, with all other factors
held constant.
The following is a summary of changes in AUM by asset class for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017
and 2016:
Year Ended December 31, 2018
AUM
Beginning
Balance
Inflows
Outflows
Market Value
Appreciation/
(Depreciation)
Net
Flows
($ in millions)
Foreign
Exchange
Appreciation/
(Depreciation)
AUM
Ending
Balance
Equity........................................... $209,358 $ 31,657 $(37,211) $ (5,554) $
Fixed Income ............................... 35,080
995
(339)
5,021
Other ............................................
Total ............................................. $249,459 $ 39,940 $(44,838) $ (4,898) $
(6,725)
(902)
7,720
563
(19,967) $
(1,475)
144
(21,298) $
(6,839) $176,998
(1,662) 32,938
4,798
(8,529) $214,734
(28)
Inflows in the Equity asset class were primarily attributable to the Global, Multi-Regional and Emerging
Markets platforms, and inflows in the Fixed Income asset class were primarily attributable to the Emerging Markets,
Global and Local platforms. Outflows in the Equity asset class were primarily attributable to the Multi-Regional,
Emerging Markets and Global equity platforms, and outflows in the Fixed Income asset class were primarily
attributable to the Emerging Markets and Global platforms.
Year Ended December 31, 2017
AUM
Beginning
Balance
Inflows
Outflows
Market Value
Appreciation/
(Depreciation)
Net
Flows
($ in millions)
Foreign
Exchange
Appreciation/
(Depreciation)
AUM
Ending
Balance
Equity........................................... $162,841 $ 37,158 $(33,778) $ 3,380 $
(522)
Fixed Income ............................... 31,155
Other ............................................
232
3,914
Total ............................................. $197,910 $ 43,804 $(40,714) $ 3,090 $
(6,080)
(856)
5,558
1,088
34,556 $
2,615
693
37,864 $
8,581 $209,358
1,832 35,080
5,021
10,595 $249,459
182
Year Ended December 31, 2016
Market Value
Appreciation/
(Depreciation)
Foreign
Exchange
Appreciation/
(Depreciation)
AUM
Ending
Balance
13,568 $
1,396
22
14,986 $
(3,013) $162,841
(460) 31,155
3,914
(143)
(3,616) $197,910
Net
Flows
($ in millions)
791 $
(168)
(463)
160 $
AUM
Beginning
Balance
Inflows
Outflows
Equity........................................... $151,495 $ 31,722 $(30,931) $
(6,522)
Fixed Income ............................... 30,387
Other ............................................
(1,613)
4,498
Total ............................................. $186,380 $ 39,226 $(39,066) $
6,354
1,150
51
As of February 19, 2019, AUM was $232.2 billion, a $17.5 billion increase since December 31, 2018. The
increase in AUM was due to market appreciation of $16.2 billion and net inflows of $1.4 billion, offset by foreign
exchange depreciation of $0.1 billion.
Average AUM for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 for each significant asset class is set
forth below. Average AUM generally represents the average of the monthly ending AUM balances for the period.
2018
Year Ended December 31,
2017
($ in millions)
2016
Average AUM by Asset Class:
Equity...........................................................................................
Fixed Income ...............................................................................
Alternative Investments...............................................................
Private Equity ..............................................................................
Cash Management .......................................................................
Total Average AUM ..............................................................
$
$
201,404 $
34,883
2,846
1,459
655
241,247 $
188,796
33,187
2,774
1,373
395
226,525
$
$
158,747
31,516
3,273
948
324
194,808
The following table summarizes the reported operating results attributable to the Asset Management segment:
Net Revenue ..................................................................................... $ 1,331,801
Operating Expenses..........................................................................
912,110
Operating Income ............................................................................. $
419,691
Operating Income, as a % of net revenue.........................................
31.5%
2018
2016
Year Ended December 31,
2017
($ in thousands)
$ 1,255,820
810,870
444,950
$
$
35.4%
$ 1,051,316
769,737
281,579
26.8%
Our top ten clients accounted for 26%, 25% and 21% of our total AUM at December 31, 2018, 2017 and
2016, respectively, and no individual client constituted more than 10% of our Asset Management segment net
revenue during any of the respective years.
The geographical distribution of Asset Management net revenue is set forth below in percentage terms, and is
based on the Lazard offices that manage and distribute the respective AUM amounts. Such geographical distribution
may not be reflective of the geography of the investment products or clients.
Americas ...........................................................................................
EMEA ...............................................................................................
Asia Pacific.......................................................................................
Total..................................................................................................
56%
34
10
100%
58%
32
10
100%
60%
29
11
100%
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2018
Asset Management Results of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2018 versus December 31, 2017
Asset Management net revenue increased $76 million, or 6%, as compared to 2017. Management fees and
other revenue was $1,311 million, an increase of $101 million, or 8%, as compared to $1,210 million in 2017,
primarily due to an increase in average AUM, as well as the impact of the new revenue recognition guidance.
Incentive fees were $21 million, a decrease of $25 million as compared to $46 million in 2017.
Operating expenses increased $101 million, or 12%, as compared to 2017, primarily due to the impact of the
new revenue recognition guidance.
52
Asset Management operating income was $420 million, a decrease of $25 million, or 6%, as compared to
operating income of $445 million in 2017 and, as a percentage of net revenue, was 31.5%, as compared to 35.4% in
2017.
Year Ended December 31, 2017 versus December 31, 2016
Asset Management net revenue increased $205 million, or 20%, as compared to 2016. Management fees and
other revenue was $1,210 million, an increase of $175 million, or 17%, as compared to $1,035 million in 2016,
primarily due to an increase in average AUM. Incentive fees were $46 million, an increase of $30 million as
compared to $16 million in 2016.
Operating expenses increased $41 million, or 5%, as compared to 2016, primarily due to increases in
compensation associated with increased revenue.
Asset Management operating income was $445 million, an increase of $163 million, or 58%, as compared to
operating income of $282 million in 2016 and, as a percentage of net revenue, was 35.4%, as compared to 26.8% in
2016.
Corporate
The following table summarizes the reported operating results attributable to the Corporate segment:
Interest Income.................................................................................. $
Interest Expense ................................................................................
Net Interest (Expense) .................................................................
Other Revenue (Expense) .................................................................
Net Revenue (Expense) ...............................................................
Operating Expenses (Benefit) (a)......................................................
Operating Income (Loss) .................................................................. $
2018
Year Ended December 31,
2017
($ in thousands)
5,538
$
(51,452)
(45,914)
46,723
809
(135,591)
$
136,400
11,152 $
(55,021)
(43,869)
(17,106)
(60,975)
34,669
(95,644) $
2016
3,384
(49,458)
(46,074)
27,085
(18,989)
29,118
(48,107)
(a)
Includes (i) in 2018, $6,523 relating to the partial redemption of the Company’s 2020 Notes, $10,000 relating
to expenses associated with the unconditional commitment to the Lazard Foundation and $6,495 relating to
the benefit pursuant to the tax receivable agreement, (ii) in 2017, $202,546 relating to the benefit pursuant to
the tax receivable agreement and (iii) in 2016, $3,148 relating to the redemption of the remaining portion of
the Company’s 2017 Notes.
Corporate Results of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2018 versus December 31, 2017
Net interest expense decreased $2 million, or 4%, as compared to 2017.
Other revenue decreased $64 million as compared to 2017, primarily due to lower gains in 2018 attributable to
investments held in connection with LFI.
Operating expenses increased $170 million as compared to 2017. Operating expenses included, in 2018 and
2017, benefits of $6 million and $203 million, respectively, pursuant to the tax receivable agreement (see Note 19 of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements). Excluding the impact of such benefits, operating expenses decreased
$26 million compared to 2017, primarily due to a decrease in compensation and benefits expense, including a
decrease in charges pertaining to LFI, partially offset by charges of $10 million associated with the unconditional
commitment to the Lazard Foundation and $7 million relating to the redemption of a portion of the 2020 Notes in
2018.
53
Year Ended December 31, 2017 versus December 31, 2016
Net interest expense remained substantially unchanged as compared to 2016.
Other revenue increased $20 million, or 73%, as compared to 2016, primarily due to gains in 2017 attributable
to investments held in connection with LFI.
Operating expenses decreased $165 million as compared to 2016. Operating expenses included, in 2017, a
benefit of $203 million pursuant to the tax receivable agreement (see Note 19 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements). Excluding the impact of such benefit, operating expenses increased $38 million compared to 2016,
primarily due to an increase in compensation and benefits expense, including an increase in charges pertaining to
LFI.
Cash Flows
The Company’s cash flows are influenced primarily by the timing of the receipt of Financial Advisory and
Asset Management fees, the timing of distributions to shareholders, payments of incentive compensation to
managing directors and employees and purchases of Class A common stock. Cash flows also were affected: (i) in
2018, by Lazard Group’s issuance of $500 million aggregate principal amount of its 4.50% senior notes maturing in
2028 (the “2028 Notes”) and the redemption of a portion of the 2020 Notes and (ii) in 2016, by the issuance of the
2027 Notes and the redemption of the remaining balance of the 2017 Notes.
M&A and other advisory and Asset Management fees are generally collected within 60 days of billing, while
Restructuring fee collections may extend beyond 60 days, particularly those that involve bankruptcies with court-
ordered holdbacks. Fees from our Private Capital Advisory activities are generally collected over a four-year period
from billing and typically include an interest component.
The Company makes cash payments for, or in respect of, a significant portion of its incentive compensation
during the first three months of each calendar year with respect to the prior year’s results. The Company also paid a
special dividend in 2018, 2017 and 2016.
Summary of Cash Flows:
Cash Provided By (Used In):
Operating activities:
Net income................................................................................... $
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities (a) .................................................................
Other operating activities (b) .......................................................
Net cash provided by operating activities ..............................
Investing activities.......................................................................
Financing activities (c) ................................................................
Effect of exchange rate changes ..................................................
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents and
Restricted Cash ............................................................................
Cash and Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash:
2018
Year Ended December 31,
2017
($ in millions)
2016
532 $
260
$
435
(268)
699
(46)
(726)
(90)
698
71
1,029
(27)
(318)
164
(163)
848
394
464
(225)
633
(38)
(480)
(65)
50
Beginning of Period ...................................................................
End of Period ............................................................................. $
2,455
2,292 $
1,607
2,455
$
1,557
1,607
54
(a)
Consists of the following:
2018
Year Ended December 31,
2017
($ in millions)
2016
Depreciation and amortization of property ....................................... $
Amortization of deferred expenses and stock units ..........................
Deferred tax provision ......................................................................
Amortization and other acquisition-related (benefits) costs .............
Benefit pursuant to tax receivable agreement ...................................
Gain on acquisition of portion of business already owned ...............
Loss on extinguishment of debt ........................................................
Total .................................................................................................. $
34 $
371
45
(16)
(6)
-
7
435 $
$
31
359
501
10
(203)
-
-
698
$
33
342
64
35
-
(13)
3
464
(b)
(c)
Includes net changes in operating assets and liabilities.
Consists primarily of purchases of shares of Class A common stock, tax withholdings related to the settlement
of RSUs, restricted stock awards and PRSUs, Class A common stock dividends, changes in customer deposits,
distributions to noncontrolling interest holders, activity relating to borrowings (including, in 2018, the
redemption of a portion of the 2020 Notes and issuance of the 2028 Notes and, in 2016, the redemption of the
remaining balance of the Company’s 2017 Notes and issuance of the 2027 Notes), and payments made under
the tax receivable agreement.
See Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of new accounting guidance
impacting the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company’s liquidity and capital resources are derived from operating activities, financing activities and
equity offerings.
Operating Activities
Net revenue, operating income and cash receipts fluctuate significantly between periods. In the case of
Financial Advisory, fee receipts are generally dependent upon the successful completion of client transactions, the
occurrence and timing of which is irregular and not subject to Lazard’s control.
Liquidity is significantly impacted by cash payments for, or in respect of, incentive compensation, a
significant portion of which are made during the first three months of the year. As a consequence, cash on hand
generally declines in the beginning of the year and gradually builds over the remainder of the year. We also pay
certain tax advances during the year on behalf of our managing directors, which serve to reduce their respective
incentive compensation payments. We expect this seasonal pattern of cash flow to continue.
Liquidity is also affected by the level of deposits and other customer payables, principally at LFB. To the
extent that such deposits and other customer payables rise or fall, this has a corresponding impact on liquidity held
at LFB, with the majority of such amounts generally being recorded in “deposits with banks and short-term
investments”. In the year ended December 31, 2018, as reflected on the consolidated statements of financial
condition, both “deposits with banks and short-term investments” and “deposits and other customer payables”
increased as compared to December 31, 2017, due to a higher level of LFB customer-related demand deposits,
primarily from clients and funds managed by LFG.
Lazard’s consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. Dollars. Many of Lazard’s non-U.S.
subsidiaries have a functional currency (i.e., the currency in which operational activities are primarily conducted)
that is other than the U.S. Dollar, generally the currency of the country in which such subsidiaries are domiciled.
Such subsidiaries’ assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. Dollars at the respective balance sheet date exchange
rates, while revenue and expenses are translated at average exchange rates during the year based on the daily closing
exchange rates. Adjustments that result from translating amounts from a subsidiary’s functional currency are
55
reported as a component of stockholders’ equity. Foreign currency remeasurement gains and losses on transactions
in non-functional currencies are included on the consolidated statements of operations.
We regularly monitor our liquidity position, including cash levels, investments in U.S. Treasury securities,
credit lines, principal investment commitments, interest and principal payments on debt, capital expenditures,
dividend payments, purchases of shares of Class A common stock and matters relating to liquidity and to
compliance with regulatory net capital requirements. At December 31, 2018, Lazard had approximately
$1,247 million of cash, with such amount including approximately $665 million held at Lazard’s operations outside
the U.S. Lazard provides for income taxes on substantially all of its foreign earnings, and pursuant to the Tax Act
there are no additional U.S. taxes that would be imposed on undistributed foreign earnings. We expect that no
material amount of additional taxes would be recognized upon receipt of dividends or distributions of such earnings
from our foreign operations.
We maintain lines of credit in excess of anticipated liquidity requirements. As of December 31, 2018, Lazard
had approximately $168 million in unused lines of credit available to it, including a $150 million, five-year, senior
revolving credit facility with a group of lenders that expires in September 2020 (the “Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement”) (see “—Financing Activities” below) and unused lines of credit available to LFB of approximately
$17 million (at December 31, 2018 exchange rates).
The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement contains customary terms and conditions, including limitations
on consolidations, mergers, indebtedness and certain payments, as well as financial condition covenants relating to
leverage and interest coverage ratios. Lazard Group’s obligations under the Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement may be accelerated upon customary events of default, including non-payment of principal or interest,
breaches of covenants, cross-defaults to other material debt, a change in control and specified bankruptcy events.
Financing Activities
The table below sets forth our corporate indebtedness as of December 31, 2018 and 2017. The agreements
with respect to this indebtedness are discussed in more detail in our consolidated financial statements and related
notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-K.
Outstanding as of
Senior Debt
Maturity
Date
December 31, 2018
Unamortized
Debt Costs
Carrying
Value
Principal
December 31, 2017
Unamortized
Debt Costs
Carrying
Value
Principal
Lazard Group 2020 Senior Notes ..............
Lazard Group 2025 Senior Notes ..............
Lazard Group 2027 Senior Notes ..............
Lazard Group 2028 Senior Notes ..............
2020 $ 250.0 $
400.0
2025
300.0
2027
500.0
2028
$1,450.0 $
($ in millions)
0.9 $ 249.1 $ 500.0 $
397.1
400.0
2.9
296.8
300.0
3.2
-
491.2
8.8
15.8 $1,434.2 $1,200.0 $
2.6 $ 497.4
396.6
3.4
296.4
3.6
-
-
9.6 $1,190.4
During September 2018, Lazard Group completed an offering of the 2028 Notes. Lazard Group used a portion
of the net proceeds of the 2028 Notes to redeem or otherwise retire $250 million of the 2020 Notes, which, including
the recognition of unamortized issuance costs, resulted in a loss on debt extinguishment in connection with the
redemption of such 2020 Notes of approximately $7 million.
During November 2016, Lazard Group completed an offering of the 2027 Notes. Lazard Group used a portion
of the net proceeds of the 2027 Notes to redeem or otherwise retire the remaining $98 million of 2017 Notes, which,
including the recognition of unamortized issuance costs, resulted in a loss on debt extinguishment in connection with
the redemption of such 2017 Notes of approximately $3 million.
Lazard’s annual cash flow generated from operations historically has been sufficient to enable it to meet its
annual obligations. We believe that our cash flows from operating activities, along with the use of our credit lines as
needed, should be sufficient for us to fund our current obligations for the next 12 months.
56
As long as the lenders’ commitments remain in effect, any loan pursuant to the Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement remains outstanding and unpaid or any other amount is due to the lending bank group, the Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement includes financial covenants that require that Lazard Group not permit (i) its
Consolidated Leverage Ratio (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) for the 12-month period
ending on the last day of any fiscal quarter to be greater than 3.25 to 1.00 or (ii) its Consolidated Interest Coverage
Ratio (as defined in the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement) for the 12-month period ending on the last day of
any fiscal quarter to be less than 3.00 to 1.00. For the 12-month period ended December 31, 2018, Lazard Group
was in compliance with such ratios, with its Consolidated Leverage Ratio being 1.33 to 1.00 and its Consolidated
Interest Coverage Ratio being 20.23 to 1.00. In any event, no amounts were outstanding under the Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement as of December 31, 2018.
In addition, the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, indenture and supplemental indentures relating to
Lazard Group’s senior notes contain certain other covenants (none of which relate to financial condition), events of
default and other customary provisions. At December 31, 2018, the Company was in compliance with all of these
provisions. We may, to the extent required and subject to restrictions contained in our financing arrangements, use
other financing sources, which may cause us to be subject to additional restrictions or covenants.
See Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding senior debt.
Stockholders’ Equity
At December 31, 2018, total stockholders’ equity was $970 million, as compared to $1,259 million and
$1,294 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, including $917 million, $1,200 million and
$1,236 million attributable to Lazard Ltd on the respective dates. The net activity in stockholders’ equity during the
years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 is reflected in the table below:
Stockholders’ Equity - Beginning of Year ............................................. $
Adjustment for the cumulative effect on prior years from the adoption
of new accounting guidance related to share-based
incentive compensation .......................................................................
Balance, as adjusted, Beginning of Year ................................................
Increase (decrease) due to:
Net income ........................................................................................
Other comprehensive income (loss)..................................................
Amortization of share-based incentive compensation ......................
Purchase of Class A common stock ..................................................
Settlement of share-based incentive compensation (a) .....................
Class A common stock dividends .....................................................
Distributions to noncontrolling interests, net ....................................
Other - net .........................................................................................
Stockholders’ Equity - End of Year........................................................ $
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
($ in millions)
1,259
$
1,294
-
1,259
532
(41)
268
(553)
(118)
(360)
(11)
(6)
$
970
81
1,375
260
82
273
(307)
(73)
(341)
(5)
(5)
1,259
(a)
The tax withholding portion of share-based compensation is settled in cash, not shares.
57
The Board of Directors of Lazard has issued a series of authorizations to repurchase Class A common stock,
which help offset the dilutive effect of our share-based incentive compensation plans. During a given year the
Company intends to repurchase at least as many shares as it expects to ultimately issue pursuant to such
compensation plans in respect of year-end incentive compensation attributable to the prior year. The rate at which
the Company purchases shares in connection with this annual objective may vary from period to period due to a
variety of factors. Purchases with respect to such program are set forth in the table below:
Year Ended December 31:
2016.....................................................................................................................
2017.....................................................................................................................
2018.....................................................................................................................
Number of
Shares
8,551,271 $
6,956,097 $
12,206,652 $
Average
Price Per
Share
35.11
44.10
45.29
As of December 31, 2018, a total of $296 million of share repurchase authorization remained available under
the Company’s share repurchase program, all of which will expire on December 31, 2020.
In addition, on February 4, 2019, the Board of Directors of Lazard authorized the repurchase of up to $300
million of additional shares of Class A common stock, which authorization will expire on December 31, 2020,
bringing the total available share repurchase authorization as of February 4, 2019 to approximately $510 million.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company had in place trading plans under Rule 10b5-1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, pursuant to which it effected stock repurchases in the open market.
On February 4, 2019, the Board of Directors of Lazard declared dividends totaling $0.94 per share, comprised
of a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share, and an extra cash dividend of $0.50 per share, on our Class A common
stock. The dividends are payable on March 1, 2019, to stockholders of record on February 15, 2019.
The Company plans to continue to deploy excess cash and may do so in a variety of ways, which may include
repurchasing outstanding shares of Class A common stock, paying dividends to stockholders and repurchasing its
outstanding debt.
See Notes 14 and 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding
Lazard’s stockholders’ equity and incentive plans, respectively.
Regulatory Capital
We actively monitor our regulatory capital base. Our principal subsidiaries are subject to regulatory
requirements in their respective jurisdictions to ensure their general financial soundness and liquidity, which require,
among other things, that we comply with rules regarding certain minimum capital requirements, record-keeping,
reporting procedures, relationships with customers, experience and training requirements for employees and certain
other requirements and procedures. These regulatory requirements may restrict the flow of funds to and from
affiliates. See Note 20 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information. These regulations
differ in the U.S., the U.K., France and other countries in which we operate. Our capital structure is designed to
provide each of our subsidiaries with capital and liquidity consistent with its business and regulatory requirements.
For a discussion of regulations relating to us, see Item 1, “Business—Regulation” included in this Form 10-K and
Note 20 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
58
Contractual Obligations
The following table sets forth information relating to Lazard’s contractual obligations as of December 31,
2018:
Contractual Obligations Payment Due by Period
Total
Less than
1 Year
1-3 Years 3-5 Years
($ in thousands)
More than
5 Years
Senior debt (including interest) (a) ........................... $1,885,479 $ 59,000 $ 357,375 $ 96,750 $1,372,354
Operating leases (exclusive of $26,941 of
488,612
committed sublease income) (b) ............................
Investment capital funding commitments (c)............
-
Total (d)..................................................................... $2,773,167 $ 154,177 $ 530,521 $ 227,503 $1,860,966
86,839 173,146 130,753
-
879,350
8,338
8,338
-
(a)
(b)
See Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
In August 2018, the Company entered into a lease agreement for additional office facilities, which are
currently under construction, with delivery anticipated in the third quarter of 2019. Operating lease
commitments in the table above include the impact of the new lease agreement. See Note 13 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
(d)
(c) Unfunded commitments to private equity investments consolidated but not owned by Lazard of $14,437 are
excluded. Such commitments are required to be funded by capital contributions from noncontrolling interest
holders. See Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. These amounts are generally due on
demand and therefore are presented in the “less than 1 year” category.
The table above excludes contingent obligations, given the inability to make a reasonably reliable estimate of
the timing of the amounts of any such payments. The table above also excludes any possible payments for
uncertain tax positions and payments pursuant to the Company’s tax receivable agreement, given that the
actual amount and timing of payments under the tax receivable agreement could differ materially from our
estimates. At December 31, 2018, a tax receivable agreement obligation of $270,640 was recorded on the
consolidated statements of financial condition, of which the Company currently expects that approximately
$23,000 will be paid within the next 12 months. See “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates—Income
Taxes” below. See also Notes 13, 15, 16, 17 and 19 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements regarding
information in connection with commitments, incentive plans, employee benefit plans, income taxes and tax
receivable agreement obligations, respectively.
Effect of Inflation
We do not believe inflation will significantly affect our compensation costs as they are substantially variable
in nature. However, the rate of inflation may affect certain of our other expenses, such as information technology
and occupancy costs. To the extent inflation results in rising interest rates and has other effects upon the securities
markets or general macroeconomic conditions, it may adversely affect our financial position and results of
operations by impacting overall levels of M&A activity, reducing our AUM or net revenue, or otherwise. See
Item 1A, “Risk Factors—Other Business Risks—Difficult market conditions can adversely affect our business in
many ways, including by reducing the volume of the transactions involving our Financial Advisory business and
reducing the value or performance of the assets we manage in our Asset Management business, which, in each case,
could materially reduce our revenue or income and adversely affect our financial position”.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Management’s discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations is
based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in conformity with U.S. GAAP. The
preparation of Lazard’s consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities. On an ongoing basis, Lazard evaluates its estimates, including those related to revenue recognition,
income taxes (including the impact on the tax receivable agreement obligation), investing activities and goodwill.
Lazard bases these estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that it believes to be reasonable
59
under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments, including judgments regarding
the carrying values of assets and liabilities, that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may
differ from these estimates.
Lazard believes that the critical accounting policies set forth below comprise the most significant estimates
and judgments used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition
Lazard generates substantially all of its net revenue from providing Financial Advisory and Asset
Management services to clients. Lazard recognizes revenue when the following criteria are met:
•
•
•
•
•
a contract with a client has been identified;
the performance obligations in the contract have been identified;
the fee or other transaction price has been determined;
the fee or other transaction price has been allocated to each performance obligation in the contract; and
the Company has satisfied the applicable performance obligation.
The Company earns performance-based incentive fees on various investment products, including traditional
products and alternative investment funds such as hedge funds and private equity funds. See “Financial Statement
Overview” for a description of our revenue recognition policies on such fees.
If, in Lazard’s judgment, collection of a fee is not probable, Lazard will not recognize revenue until the
uncertainty is removed. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts to provide coverage for estimated losses
from our receivables. We determine the adequacy of the allowance by estimating the probability of loss based on our
analysis of the client’s creditworthiness and specifically reserve against exposures where we determine the
receivables are impaired, which may include situations where a fee is in dispute or litigation has commenced.
With respect to fees receivable from Financial Advisory activities, such receivables are generally deemed past
due when they are outstanding 60 days from the date of invoice. However, some Financial Advisory transactions
include specific contractual payment terms that may vary from one month to four years (as is the case for our Private
Capital Advisory fees) following the invoice date or may be subject to court approval (as is the case with
restructuring assignments that include bankruptcy proceedings). In such cases, receivables are deemed past due
when payment is not received by the agreed-upon contractual date or the court approval date, respectively. Financial
Advisory fee receivables past due in excess of 180 days are fully provided for unless there is evidence that the
balance is collectible. Asset Management fees are deemed past due and fully provided for when such receivables are
outstanding 12 months after the invoice date. Notwithstanding our policy for receivables past due, we specifically
reserve against exposures relating to Financial Advisory and Asset Management fees where we determine
receivables are impaired.
On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted new revenue recognition guidance. See Notes 3 and 4 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Income Taxes
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we estimate our income taxes for
each of our tax-paying entities in its respective jurisdiction. In addition to estimating actual current tax liabilities for
these jurisdictions, we also must account for the tax effects of differences between the financial reporting and tax
reporting of items, such as basis adjustments, compensation and benefits expense, and depreciation and
amortization. Differences which are temporary in nature result in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Significant
judgment is required in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities, any
valuation allowance recorded against our deferred tax assets and our unrecognized tax benefits.
60
We recognize a deferred tax asset if it is more likely than not (defined as a likelihood of greater than 50%) that
a tax benefit will be accepted by a taxing authority. The measurement of deferred tax assets and liabilities is based
upon currently enacted tax rates in the applicable jurisdictions. At December 31, 2018, on a consolidated basis, we
recorded gross deferred tax assets of approximately $735.6 million, with such amount partially offset by a valuation
allowance of approximately $73.1 million (as described below).
Subsequent to the initial recognition of deferred tax assets, we also must continually assess the likelihood that
such deferred tax assets will be realized. If we determine that we may not fully derive the benefit from a deferred tax
asset, we consider whether it would be appropriate to apply a valuation allowance against the applicable deferred tax
asset, taking into account all available information. The ultimate realization of a deferred tax asset for a particular
entity depends, among other things, on the generation of taxable income by such entity in the applicable jurisdiction.
We consider multiple possible sources of taxable income when assessing a valuation allowance against a
deferred tax asset, including:
•
•
•
•
future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences;
future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards;
taxable income in prior carryback years; and
tax-planning strategies.
The assessment regarding whether a valuation allowance is required or should be adjusted also considers all
available information, including the following:
•
•
•
•
nature, frequency, magnitude and duration of any past losses and current operating results;
duration of statutory carryforward periods;
historical experience with tax attributes expiring unused; and
near-term and medium-term financial outlook.
The weight we give to any particular item is, in part, dependent upon the degree to which it can be objectively
verified. We give greater weight to the recent results of operations of a relevant entity. Pre-tax operating losses on a
three year cumulative basis or lack of sustainable profitability are considered objectively verifiable evidence and
will generally outweigh a projection of future taxable income.
Certain of our tax-paying entities have individually experienced losses on a cumulative three year basis or
have tax attributes that may expire unused. In addition, one of our tax-paying entities has recorded a valuation
allowance on substantially all of its deferred tax assets due to the combined effect of operating losses in certain
subsidiaries of that entity as well as foreign taxes that together substantially offset any U.S. tax liability. Taking into
account all available information, we cannot determine that it is more likely than not that deferred tax assets held by
these entities will be realized. Consequently, we have recorded valuation allowances on $73.1 million of deferred
tax assets held by these entities as of December 31, 2018.
We record tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return based upon our estimates regarding the
amount that is more likely than not to be realized or paid, including in connection with the resolution of any related
appeals or other legal processes. Accordingly, we recognize liabilities for certain unrecognized tax benefits based on
the amounts that are more likely than not to be settled with the relevant taxing authority. Such liabilities are
evaluated periodically as new information becomes available and any changes in the amounts of such liabilities are
recorded as adjustments to “income tax expense.” Liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits involve significant
judgment and the ultimate resolution of such matters may be materially different from our estimates.
On January 1, 2017, we adopted new accounting guidance on share-based incentive compensation. As a result
of the adoption of this new guidance, we recognized excess tax benefits of $33.0 million and $9.0 million from the
vesting of share-based incentive compensation in the provision for income taxes in the consolidated statements of
operations for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Upon adoption of the new guidance, we
61
also recorded deferred tax assets of $81.5 million, net of a valuation allowance of $12.1 million, for previously
unrecognized excess tax benefits (including tax benefits from dividends or dividend equivalents) on share-based
incentive compensation, with an offsetting adjustment to retained earnings. See Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements for further information on the adoption of this new guidance. The new guidance has since
January 1, 2017 affected, and the Company expects that in future periods the new guidance will affect, the provision
for income taxes for the delivery of stock under share-based incentive compensation arrangements, as well as the
effective tax rate in the relevant periods, which could be material to the consolidated statements of operations and
the classification of cash flows in the relevant periods.
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Act was enacted. The Tax Act significantly revised the U.S. corporate income
tax system by, among other changes, lowering the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, implementing a
partial territorial tax system and imposing a one-time repatriation tax on the deemed repatriated earnings of foreign
subsidiaries. The Tax Act also included several provisions that limited the benefit of the tax rate reduction, such as
restricting the deductibility of interest expense and other corporate business expenses. The Tax Act further included
anti-base erosion provisions such as the BEAT and tax on GILTI.
Lazard is a holding company that is treated as a publicly traded partnership for U.S. tax purposes, and our U.S.
and certain foreign subsidiaries were impacted by the Tax Act. See Notes 17 and 19 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional information regarding the impact of the Tax Act on us.
In addition to the discussion above regarding deferred tax assets and associated valuation allowances, as well
as unrecognized tax benefit liability estimates, other factors affect our provision for income taxes, including changes
in the geographic mix of our business, the level of our annual pre-tax income, transfer pricing and intercompany
transactions.
See Item 1A, “Risk Factors” and Note 17 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information related to income taxes.
Amended and Restated Tax Receivable Agreement
During the period ended June 30, 2015, we released substantially all of our valuation allowance against
deferred tax assets. As a result, we accrued a corresponding liability during the period ended June 30, 2015 for
amounts relating to the Second Amended and Restated Tax Receivable Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2015
(the “Amended and Restated Tax Receivable Agreement”), between Lazard and LTBP Trust (the “Trust”). See
Note 19 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the Amended and
Restated Tax Receivable Agreement.
The amount of the Amended and Restated Tax Receivable Agreement liability is an undiscounted amount
based upon currently enacted tax laws, including the Tax Act, the current structure of the Company and various
assumptions regarding potential future operating profitability. The assumptions reflected in the estimate involve
significant judgment, and if our structure were to change or our annual taxable income were to increase, we could be
required to accelerate payments under the Amended and Restated Tax Receivable Agreement. As such, the actual
amount and timing of payments under the Amended and Restated Tax Receivable Agreement could differ materially
from our estimates. Any changes in the amount of the estimated liability would be recorded as a non-compensation
expense in the consolidated statement of operations. Adjustments, if necessary, to the related deferred tax assets
would be recorded through income tax expense.
The cumulative liability relating to our obligations under the Amended and Restated Tax Receivable
Agreement recorded as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $271 million and $310 million, respectively, which
includes the impact of the Tax Act as of both periods, and is recorded in “tax receivable agreement obligation” on
the consolidated statements of financial condition.
62
Investments
Investments consist primarily of interest-bearing deposits, debt and equity securities, and interests in
alternative investment, debt, equity and private equity funds.
These investments, with the exception of interest-bearing deposits, are carried at fair value on the consolidated
statements of financial condition, and any increases or decreases in the fair value of these investments are reflected
in earnings. The fair value of investments is generally based upon market prices or the net asset value (“NAV”) or
its equivalent for investments in funds. See Note 7 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information on the measurement of the fair value of investments.
Lazard is subject to market and credit risk on investments held. As such, gains and losses on investment
positions held, which arise from sales or changes in the fair value of the investments, are not predictable and can
cause periodic fluctuations in net income.
Data relating to investments is set forth below:
December 31,
2018
2017
($ in thousands)
Seed investments by asset class:
Equities (a)........................................................................... $
Fixed income........................................................................
Alternative investments .......................................................
Total seed investments ..............................................................
Other investments owned:
Private equity (b) .................................................................
Interest-bearing deposits ......................................................
Fixed income and other (c) ..................................................
Total other investments owned .................................................
Subtotal......................................................................................
Add:
73,410 $
9,548
7,131
90,089
41,788
510
226,346
268,644
358,733
Private equity consolidated, not owned (d) .........................
LFI (e) ..................................................................................
Total investments ...................................................................... $
14,555
201,860
575,148 $
111,067
15,215
8,392
134,674
57,457
556
23,780
81,793
216,467
19,222
191,497
427,186
(a) At December 31, 2018 and 2017, seed investments in directly owned equity securities were invested as follows:
December 31,
2018
2017
Percentage invested in:
Financials................................................................
Consumer................................................................
Industrial.................................................................
Technology .............................................................
Other .......................................................................
Total ..................................................................
30%
28
13
14
15
100%
27%
25
15
11
22
100%
(b)
Private equity investments include investments related to certain legacy businesses and co-investments in
private equity funds managed by our Asset Management business. Co-investments owned were $27 million
and $36 million as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
(c) At December 31, 2018, includes investments in U.S. Treasury securities of approximately $200 million with
original maturities of greater than three months and less than one year.
63
(d) Represents private equity investments that are consolidated but owned by noncontrolling interests, and
(e)
therefore do not subject the Company to market or credit risk. The applicable noncontrolling interests are
presented within “stockholders’ equity” on the consolidated statements of financial condition.
Composed of investments held in connection with LFI and other similar deferred compensation arrangements.
The market risk associated with such investments is equally offset by the market risk associated with the
derivative liability with respect to awards expected to vest. The Company is subject to market risk associated
with any portion of such investments that employees may forfeit. See “—Risk Management—Risks Related to
Derivatives” for risk management information relating to derivatives. LFI investments held in entities in
which the Company maintained a controlling interest were $69 million in three entities as of December 31,
2018, as compared to $53 million in two entities as of December 31, 2017.
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, total investments with a fair value of $575 million and $427 million,
respectively, included $57 million and $80 million, respectively, or 10% and 19%, respectively, of investments that
were classified using NAV or its equivalent as a practical expedient. See Notes 6 and 7 of Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional information regarding investments measured at fair value, including the levels of
fair value within which such measurements of fair value fall.
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company held seed investments of approximately $90 million and
$135 million, respectively. Seed investments held in entities in which the Company maintained a controlling interest
were $31 million in eight entities as of December 31, 2018, as compared to $28 million in eight entities as of
December 31, 2017.
As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company did not consolidate or deconsolidate any seed investment
entities or LFI investment entities. As such, 100% of the recorded balance of seed investments and LFI investments
as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 represented the Company’s economic interest in the seed investments. See “—
Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” below for more information on the Company’s policy regarding the
consolidation of seed and LFI investment entities.
For additional information regarding risks associated with our investments, see “Risk Management—
Investments” below as well as Item 1A, “Risk Factors—Other Business Risks—Our results of operations may be
affected by fluctuations in the fair value of positions held in our investment portfolios”.
Assets Under Management
AUM primarily consists of debt and equity instruments, which have a value that is readily available based on
either prices quoted on a recognized exchange or prices provided by external pricing services.
Prices of equity and debt securities and other instruments that comprise our AUM are provided by well-
recognized, independent, third-party vendors. Such third-party vendors rely on prices provided by external pricing
services which are obtained from recognized exchanges or markets, or, for certain fixed income securities, from an
evaluated bid or other similarly sourced price.
Either directly, or through our third-party vendors, we perform a variety of regular due diligence procedures
on our pricing service providers. Those procedures include oversight by our internal operations group, review of the
pricing service providers’ internal control frameworks, review of the pricing service providers’ valuation
methodologies, reconciliation to client custodial account values and comparison of significant pricing differences.
Goodwill
In accordance with current accounting guidance, goodwill has an indefinite life and is tested for impairment
annually, as of November 1, or more frequently if circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. The
Company performs a qualitative evaluation about whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting
unit is less than its carrying amount in lieu of actually calculating the fair value of the reporting unit. See Note 10 of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding goodwill.
64
Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Lazard Group and entities in which it has a
controlling interest. Lazard determines whether it has a controlling interest in an entity by first evaluating whether
the entity is a voting interest entity (“VOE”) or a variable interest entity (“VIE”) under U.S. GAAP.
•
•
Voting Interest Entities. VOEs are entities in which (i) the total equity investment at risk is sufficient to
enable the entity to finance itself independently and (ii) the equity holders have the obligation to absorb
losses, the right to receive residual returns and the right to make decisions about the entity’s activities.
Lazard is required to consolidate a VOE if it holds a majority of the voting interest in such VOE.
Variable Interest Entities. VIEs are entities that lack one or more of the characteristics of a VOE. If
Lazard has a variable interest, or a combination of variable interests, in a VIE, it is required to analyze
whether it needs to consolidate such VIE. Lazard is required to consolidate a VIE if we are the primary
beneficiary having (i) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the
VIE’s economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb losses of, or receive benefits from, the
VIE that could be potentially significant to the VIE.
Lazard’s involvement with various entities that are VOEs or VIEs primarily arises from investment
management contracts with fund entities in our Asset Management business. Lazard is not required to consolidate
such entities because, with the exception of certain seed investments, as discussed below, we do not hold more than
an inconsequential equity interest in such entities and we do not hold other variable interests (including our
investment management agreements, which do not meet the definition of variable interests) in such entities.
Lazard makes seed and LFI investments in certain entities that are considered VOEs and often require
consolidation as a result of our investment. The impact of seed and LFI investment entities that require consolidation
on the consolidated financial statements, including any consolidation or deconsolidation of such entities, is not
material to our financial statements. Our exposure to loss from entities in which we have made such investments is
limited to the extent of our investment in, or investment commitment to, such entities. See “Critical Accounting
Policies and Estimates—Investments” above for more information regarding our investments.
Generally, when the Company initially invests to seed an investment entity, the Company is the majority
owner of the entity. Our majority ownership in seed investment entities represents a controlling interest, except
when we are the general partner in such entities and the third-party investors have the right to replace the general
partner. To the extent material, we consolidate seed investment entities in which we own a controlling interest, and
we would deconsolidate any such entity when we no longer have a controlling interest in such entity.
Risk Management
Investments
The Company has investments in a variety of asset classes, primarily debt and equity securities, and interests
in alternative investments, debt, equity and private equity funds. The Company makes investments primarily to seed
strategies in our Asset Management business or to reduce exposure arising from LFI and other similar deferred
compensation arrangements. The Company measures its net economic exposure to market and other risks arising
from investments that it owns, excluding (i) investments held in connection with LFI and other similar deferred
compensation arrangements, (ii) investments in funds owned entirely by the noncontrolling interest holders of
certain acquired entities and (iii) interest-bearing deposits with maturities over 90 days that allow daily withdrawals
without principal penalties.
Risk sensitivities include the effects of economic hedging. For equity market price risk, investment portfolios
and their corresponding hedges are beta-adjusted to the All-Country World equity index. Fair value and sensitivity
measurements presented herein are based on various portfolio exposures at a particular point in time and may not be
representative of future results. Risk exposures may change as a result of ongoing portfolio activities and changing
market conditions, among other things.
65
Equity Market Price Risk—At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company’s exposure to equity market price
risk in its investment portfolio, which primarily relates to investments in equity securities, equity funds and hedge
funds, was approximately $84 million and $107 million, respectively. The Company hedges market exposure arising
from a significant portion of our equity investment portfolios by entering into total return swaps. The Company
estimates that a hypothetical 10% adverse change in market prices would result in a net decrease of approximately
$0.8 million and $2.0 million in the carrying value of such investments as of December 31, 2018 and 2017,
respectively, including the effect of the hedging transactions.
Interest Rate/Credit Spread Risk—At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company’s exposure to interest rate
and credit spread risk in its investment portfolio related to investments in debt securities or funds which invest
primarily in debt securities was $245 million and $58 million, respectively. The Company hedges market exposure
arising from a portion of our debt investment portfolios by entering into total return swaps. The Company estimates
that a hypothetical 100 basis point adverse change in interest rates or credit spreads would result in a decrease of
approximately $0.9 million and $1.3 million in the carrying value of such investments as of December 31, 2018 and
2017, respectively, including the effect of the hedging transactions.
Foreign Exchange Rate Risk—At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company’s exposure to foreign exchange
rate risk in its investment portfolio, which primarily relates to investments in foreign currency denominated equity
and debt securities, was $41 million and $65 million, respectively. A significant portion of the Company’s foreign
currency exposure related to our equity and debt investment portfolios is hedged through the aforementioned total
return swaps. The Company estimates that a 10% adverse change in foreign exchange rates versus the U.S. Dollar
would result in a decrease of approximately $0.1 million and $1.7 million in the carrying value of such investments
as of both December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, including the effect of the hedging transactions.
Private Equity—The Company invests in private equity primarily as a part of its co-investment activities and
in connection with certain legacy businesses. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company’s exposure to changes
in fair value of such investments was approximately $42 million and $57 million, respectively. The Company
estimates that a hypothetical 10% adverse change in fair value would result in a decrease of approximately $4.2
million and $5.7 million in the carrying value of such investments as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Risks Related to Receivables
We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts to provide coverage for probable losses from our receivables.
We determine the adequacy of the allowance by estimating the probability of loss based on our analysis of the
client’s creditworthiness, among other things, and specifically provide for exposures where we determine the
receivables are impaired. At December 31, 2018, total receivables amounted to $686 million, net of an allowance for
doubtful accounts of $40 million. As of that date, Financial Advisory and Asset Management fees, and customers
and other receivables comprised 73% and 27% of total receivables, respectively. At December 31, 2017, total
receivables amounted to $572 million, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts of $24 million. As of that date,
Financial Advisory and Asset Management fees, and customers and other receivables comprised 85% and 15% of
total receivables, respectively. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company had receivables past due or deemed
uncollectible of approximately $42 million and $35 million, respectively. See also “Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates—Revenue Recognition” above and Note 5 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information regarding receivables.
LFB engages in lending activities, including commitments to extend credit (primarily for clients of LFG). At
December 31, 2018 and 2017, customer receivables included $64 million and $61 million of LFB loans,
respectively, with such loans being fully collateralized and closely monitored for counterparty creditworthiness.
Credit Concentrations
To reduce the exposure to concentrations of credit, the Company monitors large exposures to individual
counterparties.
66
Risks Related to Derivatives
Lazard enters into forward foreign currency exchange contracts and interest rate swaps to hedge exposures to
currency exchange rates and interest rates and uses total return swap contracts on various equity and debt indices to
hedge a portion of its market exposure with respect to certain seed investments related to our Asset Management
business. Derivative contracts are recorded at fair value. Derivative assets amounted to $12 million and $4 million at
December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and derivative liabilities, excluding the derivative liability arising from
the Company’s obligation pertaining to LFI and other similar deferred compensation arrangements, amounted to
$1 million and $16 million at such respective dates.
The Company also records derivative liabilities relating to its obligations pertaining to LFI awards and other
similar deferred compensation arrangements, the fair value of which is based on the value of the underlying
investments, adjusted for estimated forfeitures. Changes in the fair value of the derivative liabilities are equally
offset by the changes in the fair value of investments which are expected to be delivered upon settlement of LFI
awards. Derivative liabilities relating to LFI amounted to $188 million and $182 million at December 31, 2018 and
2017, respectively.
Risks Related to Cash and Cash Equivalents and Corporate Indebtedness
A significant portion of the Company’s indebtedness has fixed interest rates, while its cash and cash
equivalents generally have market interest rates. Based on account balances as of December 31, 2018, Lazard
estimates that its annual operating income relating to cash and cash equivalents would increase by approximately
$12 million in the event interest rates were to increase by 1% and decrease by approximately $12 million if rates
were to decrease by 1%.
As of December 31, 2018, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents totaled approximately $1,247 million.
Substantially all of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents were invested in (i) highly liquid institutional money
market funds (a significant majority of which were invested solely in U.S. Government or agency money market
funds), (ii) short-term interest bearing and non-interest bearing accounts at a number of leading banks throughout the
world, (iii) short-term certificates of deposit from such banks and (iv) short-term U.S. Treasury securities. Cash and
cash equivalents are constantly monitored. On a regular basis, management reviews its investment profile as well as
the credit profile of its list of depositor banks in order to adjust any deposit or investment thresholds as necessary.
Operational Risk
Operational risk is inherent in all our business and may, for example, manifest itself in the form of errors,
breaches in the system of internal controls, employee misconduct, business interruptions, fraud, including fraud
perpetrated by third parties, or legal actions due to operating deficiencies or noncompliance. The Company
maintains a framework including policies and a system of internal controls designed to monitor and manage
operational risk and provide management with timely and accurate information. Management within each of the
operating companies is primarily responsible for its operational risk programs. The Company has in place business
continuity and disaster recovery programs that manage its capabilities to provide services in the case of a disruption.
We purchase insurance policies designed to help protect the Company against accidental loss and losses that may
significantly affect our financial objectives, personnel, property or our ability to continue to meet our responsibilities
to our various stakeholder groups. See Item 1A, “Risk Factors” above for more information regarding operational
risk in our business.
Recent Accounting Developments
For a discussion of recently issued accounting developments and their impact or potential impact on Lazard’s
consolidated financial statements, see Note 3 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
67
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Risk Management
Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk are included under the caption “Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Risk Management.”
68
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.........................................................
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm ......................................................................
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 ................................
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 .............
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2018,
2017 and 2016 .........................................................................................................................................
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 ............
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016........................................................................................................
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements................................................................................................
Page
70
71
73
75
76
77
79
82
Supplemental Financial Information
Quarterly Results..........................................................................................................................................
130
Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule I—Condensed Financial Information of Registrant (Parent Company Only)
Condensed Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 ...................................
Condensed Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.................
Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2018,
2017 and 2016 .........................................................................................................................................
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016................
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements ...................................................................................................
F-2
F-3
F-4
F-5
F-6
69
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Management of Lazard Ltd and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) is responsible for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process
designed under the supervision of the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the Company’s
consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles.
Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
•
•
•
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, and
that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of the
Company’s management and directors; and
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use
or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2018. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013).
Based on management’s assessment and those criteria, management concluded that the Company maintained
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls
may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.
The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, audited the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, as stated in their report which appears
under “Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”
70
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of Lazard Ltd:
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Lazard Ltd and subsidiaries (the “Company”)
as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based
on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule as listed in
the Index at Item 8 as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018 of the Company, and our report dated
February 25, 2019, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and financial
statement schedule.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the
accompanying “Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.” Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public
accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in
accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and
Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial
reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control
over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and
operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
New York, New York
February 25, 2019
71
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of Lazard Ltd:
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition of Lazard Ltd and
subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, comprehensive income, cash flows, and changes in stockholders’ equity for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2018, the related notes and the schedule listed in the Index at Item 8 (collectively
referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2018, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,
based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 25, 2019, expressed an
unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We
are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the
Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the
Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are
free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the
risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and
performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence
regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our
opinion.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
New York, New York
February 25, 2019
We have served as the Company’s auditors since 2000.
72
LAZARD LTD
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
DECEMBER 31, 2018 and 2017
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data)
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents................................................................................... $
Deposits with banks and short-term investments................................................
Cash deposited with clearing organizations and other segregated cash..............
Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $40,164 and $23,746
at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively):
Fees................................................................................................................
Customers and other ......................................................................................
Investments .........................................................................................................
Property (net of accumulated amortization and depreciation of $339,770
and $317,827 at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively) .........................
Goodwill and other intangible assets (net of accumulated amortization
of $65,949 and $63,099 at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively).........
Deferred tax assets ..............................................................................................
Other assets .........................................................................................................
Total Assets.............................................................................................. $
December 31,
2018
2017
1,246,537 $
1,006,969
38,379
1,483,836
935,431
35,539
501,397
184,137
685,534
575,148
487,800
83,816
571,616
427,186
212,946
205,301
375,318
597,776
258,634
4,997,241 $
391,364
650,260
228,144
4,928,677
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
73
LAZARD LTD
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
DECEMBER 31, 2018 and 2017
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data)
December 31,
2018
2017
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities:
Deposits and other customer payables........................................................... $
Accrued compensation and benefits ..............................................................
Senior debt.....................................................................................................
Tax receivable agreement obligation.............................................................
Deferred tax liabilities ...................................................................................
Other liabilities ..............................................................................................
Total Liabilities ........................................................................................
1,154,207 $
585,484
1,434,260
270,640
5,571
576,986
4,027,148
992,338
593,781
1,190,383
310,275
9,407
573,588
3,669,772
Commitments and contingencies
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share; 15,000,000 shares authorized:
Series A - no shares issued and outstanding ............................................
Series B - no shares issued and outstanding.............................................
-
-
-
-
Common stock:
Class A, par value $.01 per share (500,000,000 shares authorized;
129,766,091 shares issued at December 31, 2018 and 2017,
including shares held by subsidiaries as indicated below)....................
Additional paid-in-capital..............................................................................
Retained earnings ..........................................................................................
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax .......................................
Class A common stock held by subsidiaries, at cost (17,574,805 and
10,747,142 shares at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively) ............
Total Lazard Ltd Stockholders’ Equity....................................................
Noncontrolling interests ................................................................................
Total Stockholders’ Equity ......................................................................
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity .............................................. $
1,298
750,692
1,195,563
(273,818)
1,673,735
(756,884)
916,851
53,242
970,093
4,997,241 $
1,298
788,140
1,080,413
(232,518)
1,637,333
(437,530)
1,199,803
59,102
1,258,905
4,928,677
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
74
LAZARD LTD
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017 AND 2016
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data)
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2018
REVENUE
Investment banking and other advisory fees ............................... $
Asset management fees ...............................................................
Interest income ............................................................................
Other ............................................................................................
Total revenue..........................................................................
Interest expense ...........................................................................
Net revenue ............................................................................
1,554,114 $
1,268,399
13,127
49,193
2,884,833
58,481
2,826,352
1,385,536 $
1,195,550
7,144
109,599
2,697,829
53,518
2,644,311
1,298,364
998,887
5,233
81,179
2,383,663
50,292
2,333,371
1,340,543
109,305
83,202
97,461
45,512
63,421
35,247
-
41,219
1,815,910
517,461
123,769
393,692
1,514,735
121,107
108,644
139,693
61,349
132,964
(15,897)
(6,495)
89,486
2,145,586
680,766
148,317
532,449
1,512,873
124,842
89,205
121,671
47,932
71,305
9,514
(202,546)
44,069
1,818,865
825,446
565,599
259,847
5,324
527,125 $
6,264
253,583 $
5,994
387,698
OPERATING EXPENSES
Compensation and benefits..........................................................
Occupancy and equipment...........................................................
Marketing and business development..........................................
Technology and information services..........................................
Professional services....................................................................
Fund administration and outsourced services..............................
Amortization and other acquisition-related (benefits) costs........
Benefit pursuant to tax receivable agreement..............................
Other ............................................................................................
Total operating expenses........................................................
OPERATING INCOME.................................................................
Provision for income taxes ..........................................................
NET INCOME.................................................................................
LESS - NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS .........................................
NET INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO LAZARD LTD .............. $
ATTRIBUTABLE TO LAZARD LTD CLASS A
COMMON STOCKHOLDERS:
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OF
COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING:
Basic....................................................................................... 119,006,531 121,573,442 124,770,401
Diluted.................................................................................... 129,767,592 132,479,728 132,633,630
NET INCOME PER SHARE OF COMMON
STOCK:
Basic....................................................................................... $
Diluted.................................................................................... $
4.43 $
4.06 $
2.09 $
1.91 $
3.11
2.92
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
75
LAZARD LTD
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017 AND 2016
(dollars in thousands)
NET INCOME................................................................................... $
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET
OF TAX:
Currency translation adjustments ..................................................
Employee benefit plans:
Prior service costs (net of tax benefit of $543
for the year ended December 31, 2018) ...............................
Actuarial gain (loss) (net of tax expense (benefit) of
$131, $(3,507) and $(5,205) for the years
ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016,
respectively) ..........................................................................
Adjustment for items reclassified to earnings (net of
tax expense of $2,335, $2,220 and $1,757 for the
years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016,
respectively) ..........................................................................
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF TAX ...
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME .......................................................
LESS - COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS ...........................................
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE TO
LAZARD LTD................................................................................ $
Year Ended December 31,
2017
259,847
2018
532,449 $
$
2016
393,692
(46,602)
71,669
(57,920)
(2,653)
-
-
(2,781)
2,085
(24,473)
10,735
(41,301)
491,148
7,951
81,705
341,552
2,526
(79,867)
313,825
5,323
6,265
5,993
485,825 $
335,287 $
307,832
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
76
LAZARD LTD
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017 AND 2016
(dollars in thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income ...................................................................................................... $
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in)
operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization of property .........................................
Amortization of deferred expenses and share-based incentive
compensation ...................................................................................
Amortization and other acquisition-related (benefits) costs ...............
Deferred tax provision ........................................................................
Benefit pursuant to tax receivable agreement .....................................
Loss on extinguishment of debt ..........................................................
Gain on acquisition of portion of business already owned .................
(Increase) decrease in operating assets and increase (decrease) in
operating liabilities:
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2018
532,449 $
259,847 $
393,692
34,103
31,498
33,264
371,434
(15,897)
45,386
(6,495)
6,523
-
359,381
9,514
501,163
(202,546)
-
-
Receivables-net ...................................................................................
Investments .........................................................................................
Other assets .........................................................................................
Accrued compensation and benefits and other liabilities....................
Net cash provided by operating activities .....................................
(131,637)
(150,839)
(138,842)
152,853
699,038
95,976
28,922
(80,550)
25,910
1,029,115
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Additions to property ................................................................................
Disposals of property ................................................................................
Net cash used in investing activities .............................................
(49,593)
3,384
(46,209)
(27,670)
750
(26,920)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from:
Customer deposits ...............................................................................
Contributions from noncontrolling interests .......................................
Issuance of senior debt, net of expenses .............................................
Excess tax benefits from share-based incentive compensation ..........
Other financing activities ....................................................................
Payments for:
Senior debt ..........................................................................................
Capital lease obligations .....................................................................
Distributions to noncontrolling interests.............................................
Payments under tax receivable agreement ..........................................
Purchase of Class A common stock ....................................................
Class A common stock dividends .......................................................
Settlement of share-based incentive compensation ............................
Other financing activities ....................................................................
Net cash used in financing activities.............................................
112,061
1,706
490,970
-
-
(255,543)
(68)
(12,889)
(33,140)
(552,872)
(359,639)
(110,361)
(6,329)
(726,104)
421,885
-
-
-
-
-
(7,337)
(5,193)
(789)
(306,741)
(341,450)
(67,899)
(10,984)
(318,508)
341,825
35,247
63,660
-
3,148
(12,668)
(156,129)
71,552
(55,611)
(85,379)
632,601
(38,749)
1,096
(37,653)
7,197
93
296,757
4,071
24,484
(101,441)
(1,619)
(2,111)
(10,086)
(300,217)
(336,138)
(56,078)
(4,667)
(479,755)
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND
CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH............................
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND
CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH............................
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH—
January 1.....................................................................................................
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH—
December 31................................................................................................ $
(89,646)
163,636
(64,602)
(162,921)
847,323
50,591
2,454,806
1,607,483
1,556,892
2,291,885 $
2,454,806 $
1,607,483
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
77
RECONCILIATION OF CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND
RESTRICTED CASH WITHIN THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION:
Cash and cash equivalents......................................................................... $
Deposits with banks and short-term investments......................................
Cash deposited with clearing organizations and other segregated cash .......
TOTAL CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AND
RESTRICTED CASH................................................................................ $
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW
INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the year for:
Year Ended December 31,
2017
1,483,836 $
935,431
35,539
2018
1,246,537 $
1,006,969
38,379
2016
1,158,785
419,668
29,030
2,291,885 $
2,454,806 $
1,607,483
Interest....................................................................................................... $
Income taxes, net of refunds ..................................................................... $
50,812 $
101,671 $
49,601 $
48,738 $
46,262
72,420
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
78
D
T
L
D
R
A
Z
A
L
Y
T
I
U
Q
E
’
S
R
E
D
L
O
H
K
C
O
T
S
N
I
S
E
G
N
A
H
C
F
O
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
D
E
T
A
D
I
L
O
S
N
O
C
6
1
0
2
D
N
A
7
1
0
2
,
8
1
0
2
,
1
3
R
E
B
M
E
C
E
D
D
E
D
N
E
S
R
A
E
Y
E
H
T
R
O
F
)
s
d
n
a
s
u
o
h
t
n
i
s
r
a
l
l
o
d
(
’
s
r
e
d
l
o
h
k
c
o
t
S
g
n
i
l
l
o
r
t
n
o
c
n
o
N
’
s
r
e
d
l
o
h
k
c
o
t
S
s
e
i
r
a
i
d
i
s
b
u
S
y
B
d
l
e
H
,
)
s
s
o
L
(
e
m
o
c
n
I
y
t
i
u
q
E
s
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
I
y
t
i
u
q
E
$
s
e
r
a
h
S
x
a
T
f
o
t
e
N
l
a
t
o
T
l
a
t
o
T
d
t
L
d
r
a
z
a
L
k
c
o
t
S
n
o
m
m
o
C
e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
C
A
s
s
a
l
C
d
e
t
a
l
u
m
u
c
c
A
r
e
h
t
O
d
e
n
i
a
t
e
R
s
g
n
i
n
r
a
E
l
a
n
o
i
t
i
d
d
A
-
n
I
-
d
i
a
P
l
a
t
i
p
a
C
k
c
o
t
S
n
o
m
m
o
C
k
c
o
t
S
d
e
r
r
e
f
e
r
P
$
)
*
(
s
e
r
a
h
S
$
s
e
r
a
h
S
A
s
e
i
r
e
S
6
0
3
,
7
6
3
,
1
$
1
5
8
,
3
5
$
5
5
4
,
3
1
3
,
1
$
)
9
4
2
,
7
7
1
(
$
1
8
3
,
3
5
2
,
4
)
6
5
3
,
4
3
2
(
$
8
2
7
,
3
2
1
,
1
$
4
3
0
,
0
0
6
$
8
9
2
,
1
$
1
9
0
,
6
6
7
,
9
2
1
-
$
1
2
9
,
7
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
6
1
0
2
,
1
y
r
a
u
n
a
J
-
e
c
n
a
l
a
B
-
)
7
6
8
,
9
7
(
2
9
6
,
3
9
3
)
8
1
8
,
3
(
2
6
4
,
1
6
2
)
8
3
1
,
6
3
3
(
)
7
1
2
,
0
0
3
(
)
1
(
4
9
9
,
5
-
)
6
6
8
,
9
7
(
8
9
6
,
7
8
3
)
8
1
8
,
3
(
2
6
4
,
1
6
2
)
8
3
1
,
6
3
3
(
)
7
1
2
,
0
0
3
(
)
7
1
2
,
0
0
3
(
1
7
2
,
1
5
5
,
8
)
6
6
8
,
9
7
(
8
9
6
,
7
8
3
)
2
0
1
,
1
4
(
)
8
3
1
,
6
3
3
(
4
8
2
,
7
3
2
6
4
,
1
6
2
)
0
3
6
,
5
5
(
)
0
3
6
,
5
5
(
1
7
5
,
8
6
1
)
5
5
4
,
5
3
2
,
4
(
)
1
0
2
,
4
2
2
(
1
6
8
,
7
3
1
2
6
,
1
)
8
1
0
,
2
(
9
5
5
,
9
)
8
1
0
,
2
(
1
6
8
,
7
3
-
1
2
6
,
1
9
5
5
,
9
9
8
3
,
5
3
)
1
1
4
,
0
4
9
(
1
6
8
,
7
3
)
8
6
7
,
3
3
(
9
5
5
,
9
)
1
2
9
,
7
(
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
k
c
o
t
s
d
e
r
r
e
f
e
r
p
A
s
e
i
r
e
S
f
o
t
n
e
m
e
l
t
t
e
S
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
e
m
o
c
n
i
t
e
N
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
x
a
t
f
o
t
e
n
-
s
s
o
l
e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
c
r
e
h
t
O
:
)
s
s
o
l
(
e
m
o
c
n
i
e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
C
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
t
n
e
l
a
v
i
u
q
e
d
n
e
d
i
v
i
D
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
)
e
r
a
h
s
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
k
c
o
t
s
n
o
m
m
o
c
A
s
s
a
l
C
f
o
e
s
a
h
c
r
u
P
r
e
p
9
6
.
2
$
(
s
d
n
e
d
i
v
i
d
k
c
o
t
s
n
o
m
m
o
c
A
s
s
a
l
C
e
v
i
t
n
e
c
n
i
d
e
s
a
b
-
e
r
a
h
s
f
o
n
o
i
t
a
z
i
t
r
o
m
A
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
8
4
4
$
f
o
y
t
i
u
q
e
d
e
t
a
l
e
r
d
n
a
s
n
o
i
t
i
s
i
u
q
c
a
s
s
e
n
i
s
u
B
:
s
n
o
i
t
c
a
s
n
a
r
t
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
)
n
o
i
t
a
z
i
t
r
o
m
a
d
e
t
a
l
e
r
g
n
i
d
u
l
c
n
i
(
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
4
7
0
,
1
$
f
o
t
i
f
e
n
e
b
x
a
t
d
e
t
a
l
e
r
d
n
a
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
t
e
n
,
s
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
i
g
n
i
l
l
o
r
t
n
o
c
n
o
n
o
t
s
n
o
i
t
u
b
i
r
t
s
i
D
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
r
e
h
t
O
k
c
o
t
s
n
o
m
m
o
c
A
s
s
a
l
C
f
o
y
r
e
v
i
l
e
D
e
l
b
a
u
s
s
i
k
c
o
t
s
n
o
m
m
o
c
A
s
s
a
l
C
e
v
i
t
n
e
c
n
i
d
e
s
a
b
-
e
r
a
h
s
h
t
i
w
n
o
i
t
c
e
n
n
o
c
t
i
f
e
n
e
b
x
a
t
d
e
t
a
l
e
r
d
n
a
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
n
i
k
c
o
t
s
n
o
m
m
o
c
A
s
s
a
l
C
f
o
y
r
e
v
i
l
e
D
79
3
1
8
,
3
9
2
,
1
$
6
2
8
,
7
5
$
7
8
9
,
5
3
2
,
1
$
)
6
0
5
,
3
7
2
(
$
6
8
7
,
8
2
6
,
7
)
2
2
2
,
4
1
3
(
$
6
8
1
,
4
3
1
,
1
$
1
3
2
,
8
8
6
$
8
9
2
,
1
$
1
9
0
,
6
6
7
,
9
2
1
-
$
-
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
6
1
0
2
,
1
3
r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
-
e
c
n
a
l
a
B
.
s
t
n
e
m
e
t
a
t
s
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
f
d
e
t
a
d
i
l
o
s
n
o
c
o
t
s
e
t
o
n
e
e
S
D
T
L
D
R
A
Z
A
L
Y
T
I
U
Q
E
’
S
R
E
D
L
O
H
K
C
O
T
S
N
I
S
E
G
N
A
H
C
F
O
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
D
E
T
A
D
I
L
O
S
N
O
C
6
1
0
2
D
N
A
7
1
0
2
,
8
1
0
2
,
1
3
R
E
B
M
E
C
E
D
D
E
D
N
E
S
R
A
E
Y
E
H
T
R
O
F
)
s
d
n
a
s
u
o
h
t
n
i
s
r
a
l
l
o
d
(
l
a
t
o
T
l
a
t
o
T
d
t
L
d
r
a
z
a
L
A
s
s
a
l
C
k
c
o
t
S
n
o
m
m
o
C
’
s
r
e
d
l
o
h
k
c
o
t
S
g
n
i
l
l
o
r
t
n
o
c
n
o
N
’
s
r
e
d
l
o
h
k
c
o
t
S
s
e
i
r
a
i
d
i
s
b
u
S
y
B
d
l
e
H
d
e
t
a
l
u
m
u
c
c
A
r
e
h
t
O
e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
C
,
)
s
s
o
L
(
e
m
o
c
n
I
y
t
i
u
q
E
s
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
I
y
t
i
u
q
E
$
s
e
r
a
h
S
x
a
T
f
o
t
e
N
d
e
n
i
a
t
e
R
s
g
n
i
n
r
a
E
l
a
n
o
i
t
i
d
d
A
-
n
I
-
d
i
a
P
l
a
t
i
p
a
C
k
c
o
t
S
n
o
m
m
o
C
$
)
*
(
s
e
r
a
h
S
3
1
8
,
3
9
2
,
1
$
6
2
8
,
7
5
$
7
8
9
,
5
3
2
,
1
$
)
6
0
5
,
3
7
2
(
$
6
8
7
,
8
2
6
,
7
)
2
2
2
,
4
1
3
(
$
6
8
1
,
4
3
1
,
1
$
1
3
2
,
8
8
6
$
8
9
2
,
1
$
1
9
0
,
6
6
7
,
9
2
1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
7
1
0
2
,
1
y
r
a
u
n
a
J
-
e
c
n
a
l
a
B
4
4
5
,
1
8
4
4
5
,
1
8
4
4
5
,
1
8
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
7
5
3
,
5
7
3
,
1
6
2
8
,
7
5
1
3
5
,
7
1
3
,
1
)
6
0
5
,
3
7
2
(
6
8
7
,
8
2
6
,
7
)
2
2
2
,
4
1
3
(
0
3
7
,
5
1
2
,
1
1
3
2
,
8
8
6
8
9
2
,
1
1
9
0
,
6
6
7
,
9
2
1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
7
1
0
2
,
1
y
r
a
u
n
a
J
-
d
e
t
s
u
j
d
a
s
a
,
e
c
n
a
l
a
B
g
n
i
t
n
u
o
c
c
a
w
e
n
f
o
n
o
i
t
p
o
d
a
e
h
t
m
o
r
f
s
r
a
e
y
e
v
i
t
n
e
c
n
i
d
e
s
a
b
-
e
r
a
h
s
o
t
d
e
t
a
l
e
r
e
c
n
a
d
i
u
g
r
o
i
r
p
n
o
t
c
e
f
f
e
e
v
i
t
a
l
u
m
u
c
e
h
t
r
o
f
t
n
e
m
t
s
u
j
d
A
5
6
9
,
2
7
2
)
8
0
9
,
5
(
)
0
5
4
,
1
4
3
(
)
1
4
7
,
6
0
3
(
5
0
7
,
1
8
7
4
8
,
9
5
2
1
4
6
2
,
6
4
0
7
,
1
8
3
8
5
,
3
5
2
5
6
9
,
2
7
2
)
8
0
9
,
5
(
)
0
5
4
,
1
4
3
(
)
1
4
7
,
6
0
3
(
)
1
4
7
,
6
0
3
(
7
9
0
,
6
5
9
,
6
4
0
7
,
1
8
3
8
5
,
3
5
2
)
4
5
6
,
7
4
(
)
0
5
4
,
1
4
3
(
6
4
7
,
1
4
5
6
9
,
2
7
2
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
e
m
o
c
n
i
t
e
N
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
x
a
t
f
o
t
e
n
-
e
m
o
c
n
i
e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
c
r
e
h
t
O
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
t
n
e
l
a
v
i
u
q
e
d
n
e
d
i
v
i
D
e
v
i
t
n
e
c
n
i
d
e
s
a
b
-
e
r
a
h
s
f
o
n
o
i
t
a
z
i
t
r
o
m
A
:
e
m
o
c
n
i
e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
C
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
)
e
r
a
h
s
r
e
p
1
8
.
2
$
(
s
d
n
e
d
i
v
i
d
k
c
o
t
s
n
o
m
m
o
c
A
s
s
a
l
C
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
k
c
o
t
s
n
o
m
m
o
c
A
s
s
a
l
C
f
o
e
s
a
h
c
r
u
P
80
e
v
i
t
n
e
c
n
i
d
e
s
a
b
-
e
r
a
h
s
h
t
i
w
n
o
i
t
c
e
n
n
o
c
e
s
n
e
p
x
e
x
a
t
d
e
t
a
l
e
r
d
n
a
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
n
i
k
c
o
t
s
n
o
m
m
o
c
A
s
s
a
l
C
f
o
y
r
e
v
i
l
e
D
)
0
7
1
,
3
7
(
)
0
7
1
,
3
7
(
8
0
8
,
0
4
1
)
7
6
2
,
0
9
7
,
3
(
)
8
7
9
,
3
1
2
(
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
7
2
,
5
$
f
o
8
0
5
7
7
5
8
0
4
)
3
9
1
,
5
(
4
0
2
)
3
9
1
,
5
(
8
0
5
-
7
7
5
4
0
2
9
0
9
,
1
)
4
7
4
,
7
4
(
4
0
2
8
0
5
)
2
3
3
,
1
(
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
)
n
o
i
t
a
z
i
t
r
o
m
a
d
e
t
a
l
e
r
g
n
i
d
u
l
c
n
i
(
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
8
2
$
f
o
e
s
n
e
p
x
e
x
a
t
d
e
t
a
l
e
r
d
n
a
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
t
e
n
,
s
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
i
g
n
i
l
l
o
r
t
n
o
c
n
o
n
o
t
s
n
o
i
t
u
b
i
r
t
s
i
D
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
r
e
h
t
O
k
c
o
t
s
n
o
m
m
o
c
A
s
s
a
l
C
f
o
y
r
e
v
i
l
e
D
y
t
i
u
q
e
d
e
t
a
l
e
r
d
n
a
s
n
o
i
t
i
s
i
u
q
c
a
s
s
e
n
i
s
u
B
e
l
b
a
u
s
s
i
k
c
o
t
s
n
o
m
m
o
c
A
s
s
a
l
C
:
s
n
o
i
t
c
a
s
n
a
r
t
5
0
9
,
8
5
2
,
1
$
2
0
1
,
9
5
$
3
0
8
,
9
9
1
,
1
$
)
0
3
5
,
7
3
4
(
$
2
4
1
,
7
4
7
,
0
1
)
8
1
5
,
2
3
2
(
$
3
1
4
,
0
8
0
,
1
$
0
4
1
,
8
8
7
$
8
9
2
,
1
$
1
9
0
,
6
6
7
,
9
2
1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
7
1
0
2
,
1
3
r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
-
e
c
n
a
l
a
B
.
s
t
n
e
m
e
t
a
t
s
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
f
d
e
t
a
d
i
l
o
s
n
o
c
o
t
s
e
t
o
n
e
e
S
D
T
L
D
R
A
Z
A
L
Y
T
I
U
Q
E
’
S
R
E
D
L
O
H
K
C
O
T
S
N
I
S
E
G
N
A
H
C
F
O
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
D
E
T
A
D
I
L
O
S
N
O
C
6
1
0
2
D
N
A
7
1
0
2
,
8
1
0
2
,
1
3
R
E
B
M
E
C
E
D
D
E
D
N
E
S
R
A
E
Y
E
H
T
R
O
F
)
s
d
n
a
s
u
o
h
t
n
i
s
r
a
l
l
o
d
(
l
a
t
o
T
l
a
t
o
T
d
t
L
d
r
a
z
a
L
A
s
s
a
l
C
k
c
o
t
S
n
o
m
m
o
C
’
s
r
e
d
l
o
h
k
c
o
t
S
g
n
i
l
l
o
r
t
n
o
c
n
o
N
’
s
r
e
d
l
o
h
k
c
o
t
S
s
e
i
r
a
i
d
i
s
b
u
S
y
B
d
l
e
H
d
e
t
a
l
u
m
u
c
c
A
r
e
h
t
O
e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
C
,
)
s
s
o
L
(
e
m
o
c
n
I
y
t
i
u
q
E
s
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
I
y
t
i
u
q
E
$
s
e
r
a
h
S
x
a
T
f
o
t
e
N
d
e
n
i
a
t
e
R
s
g
n
i
n
r
a
E
l
a
n
o
i
t
i
d
d
A
-
n
I
-
d
i
a
P
l
a
t
i
p
a
C
k
c
o
t
S
n
o
m
m
o
C
$
)
*
(
s
e
r
a
h
S
5
0
9
,
8
5
2
,
1
$
2
0
1
,
9
5
$
3
0
8
,
9
9
1
,
1
$
)
0
3
5
,
7
3
4
(
$
2
4
1
,
7
4
7
,
0
1
)
8
1
5
,
2
3
2
(
$
3
1
4
,
0
8
0
,
1
$
0
4
1
,
8
8
7
$
8
9
2
,
1
$
1
9
0
,
6
6
7
,
9
2
1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
8
1
0
2
,
1
y
r
a
u
n
a
J
-
e
c
n
a
l
a
B
3
7
5
,
7
6
2
)
8
2
3
,
6
(
)
9
3
6
,
9
5
3
(
)
2
7
8
,
2
5
5
(
)
1
0
3
,
1
4
(
9
4
4
,
2
3
5
)
1
(
4
2
3
,
5
)
0
0
3
,
1
4
(
5
2
1
,
7
2
5
3
7
5
,
7
6
2
)
8
2
3
,
6
(
)
9
3
6
,
9
5
3
(
)
2
7
8
,
2
5
5
(
)
2
7
8
,
2
5
5
(
2
5
6
,
6
0
2
,
2
1
)
0
0
3
,
1
4
(
5
2
1
,
7
2
5
)
3
8
5
,
0
5
(
)
9
3
6
,
9
5
3
(
5
5
2
,
4
4
3
7
5
,
7
6
2
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
e
m
o
c
n
i
t
e
N
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
x
a
t
f
o
t
e
n
-
s
s
o
l
e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
c
r
e
h
t
O
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
t
n
e
l
a
v
i
u
q
e
d
n
e
d
i
v
i
D
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
)
e
r
a
h
s
r
e
p
3
0
.
3
$
(
s
d
n
e
d
i
v
i
d
k
c
o
t
s
n
o
m
m
o
c
A
s
s
a
l
C
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
k
c
o
t
s
n
o
m
m
o
c
A
s
s
a
l
C
f
o
e
s
a
h
c
r
u
P
e
v
i
t
n
e
c
n
i
d
e
s
a
b
-
e
r
a
h
s
f
o
n
o
i
t
a
z
i
t
r
o
m
A
:
)
s
s
o
l
(
e
m
o
c
n
i
e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
C
e
v
i
t
n
e
c
n
i
d
e
s
a
b
-
e
r
a
h
s
h
t
i
w
n
o
i
t
c
e
n
n
o
c
e
s
n
e
p
x
e
x
a
t
d
e
t
a
l
e
r
d
n
a
n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c
n
i
k
c
o
t
s
n
o
m
m
o
c
A
s
s
a
l
C
f
o
y
r
e
v
i
l
e
D
)
2
7
0
,
8
1
1
(
)
2
7
0
,
8
1
1
(
9
0
4
,
2
3
2
)
0
2
9
,
3
5
3
,
5
(
)
1
8
4
,
0
5
3
(
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
1
1
7
,
7
$
f
o
-
-
1
6
5
)
3
8
1
,
1
1
(
)
3
8
1
,
1
1
(
-
-
-
1
6
5
9
0
1
,
1
)
9
6
0
,
5
2
(
)
3
5
7
,
1
(
)
9
0
1
,
1
(
1
6
5
3
5
7
,
1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
k
c
o
t
s
n
o
m
m
o
c
A
s
s
a
l
C
f
o
y
r
e
v
i
l
e
D
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
)
n
o
i
t
a
z
i
t
r
o
m
a
d
e
t
a
l
e
r
g
n
i
d
u
l
c
n
i
(
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
s
t
n
e
l
a
v
i
u
q
e
d
n
e
d
i
v
i
D
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
t
e
n
,
s
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
i
g
n
i
l
l
o
r
t
n
o
c
n
o
n
o
t
s
n
o
i
t
u
b
i
r
t
s
i
D
e
l
b
a
u
s
s
i
k
c
o
t
s
n
o
m
m
o
c
A
s
s
a
l
C
y
t
i
u
q
e
d
e
t
a
l
e
r
d
n
a
s
n
o
i
t
i
s
i
u
q
c
a
s
s
e
n
i
s
u
B
:
s
n
o
i
t
c
a
s
n
a
r
t
3
9
0
,
0
7
9
$
2
4
2
,
3
5
$
1
5
8
,
6
1
9
$
)
4
8
8
,
6
5
7
(
$
5
0
8
,
4
7
5
,
7
1
)
8
1
8
,
3
7
2
(
$
3
6
5
,
5
9
1
,
1
$
2
9
6
,
0
5
7
$
8
9
2
,
1
$
1
9
0
,
6
6
7
,
9
2
1
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
8
1
0
2
,
1
3
r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
-
e
c
n
a
l
a
B
.
y
l
e
v
i
t
c
e
p
s
e
r
,
8
1
0
2
d
n
a
7
1
0
2
,
6
1
0
2
,
1
3
r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
t
a
d
e
u
s
s
i
k
c
o
t
s
n
o
m
m
o
c
A
s
s
a
l
C
s
’
y
n
a
p
m
o
C
e
h
t
f
o
s
e
r
a
h
s
1
9
0
,
6
6
7
,
9
2
1
s
e
d
u
l
c
n
I
)
*
(
81
.
s
t
n
e
m
e
t
a
t
s
l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
f
d
e
t
a
d
i
l
o
s
n
o
c
o
t
s
e
t
o
n
e
e
S
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
1.
ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Organization
Lazard Ltd, a Bermuda holding company, and its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as “Lazard Ltd”,
“Lazard”, “we” or the “Company”), including Lazard Ltd’s indirect investment in Lazard Group LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company (collectively referred to, together with its subsidiaries, as “Lazard Group”), is one of the
world’s preeminent financial advisory and asset management firms and has long specialized in crafting solutions to
the complex financial and strategic challenges of our clients. We serve a diverse set of clients around the world,
including corporations, governments, institutions, partnerships and individuals.
Lazard Ltd indirectly held 100% of all outstanding Lazard Group common membership interests as of
December 31, 2018 and 2017. Lazard Ltd, through its control of the managing members of Lazard Group, controls
Lazard Group, which as of December 31, 2018 was governed by an Amended and Restated Operating Agreement
dated as of October 26, 2015, as amended (the “Operating Agreement”). The Operating Agreement was
subsequently amended and restated on February 4, 2019.
Lazard Ltd’s primary operating asset is its indirect ownership of the common membership interests of, and
managing member interests in, Lazard Group, whose principal operating activities are included in two business
segments:
•
•
Financial Advisory, which offers corporate, partnership, institutional, government, sovereign and
individual clients across the globe a wide array of financial advisory services regarding mergers and
acquisitions (“M&A”), capital advisory, restructurings, shareholder advisory, sovereign advisory,
capital raising and other strategic advisory, and
Asset Management, which offers a broad range of global investment solutions and investment
management services in equity and fixed income strategies, asset allocation strategies, alternative
investments and private equity funds to corporations, public funds, sovereign entities, endowments and
foundations, labor funds, financial intermediaries and private clients.
In addition, we record selected other activities in our Corporate segment, including management of cash,
investments, deferred tax assets, outstanding indebtedness, certain contingent obligations, and assets and liabilities
associated with Lazard Group’s Paris-based subsidiary Lazard Frères Banque SA (“LFB”).
Basis of Presentation
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The Company’s policy is to consolidate entities in which
it has a controlling financial interest. The Company consolidates:
•
•
Voting interest entities (“VOEs”) where the Company holds a majority of the voting interest in such
VOEs, and
Variable interest entities (“VIEs”) where the Company is the primary beneficiary having the power to
direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and the
obligation to absorb losses of, or receive benefits from, the VIE that could be potentially significant to
the VIE.
When the Company does not have a controlling interest in an entity, but exerts significant influence over such
entity’s operating and financial decisions, the Company either (i) applies the equity method of accounting in which
it records a proportionate share of the entity’s net earnings, or (ii) elects the option to measure its investment at fair
value. Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated.
82
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
The consolidated financial statements include Lazard Ltd, Lazard Group and Lazard Group’s principal
operating subsidiaries: Lazard Frères & Co. LLC (“LFNY”), a New York limited liability company, along with its
subsidiaries, including Lazard Asset Management LLC and its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as “LAM”); the
French limited liability companies Compagnie Financière Lazard Frères SAS (“CFLF”) along with its subsidiaries,
LFB and Lazard Frères Gestion SAS (“LFG”), and Maison Lazard SAS and its subsidiaries; and Lazard & Co.,
Limited (“LCL”), through Lazard & Co., Holdings Limited (“LCH”), an English private limited company, together
with their jointly owned affiliates and subsidiaries.
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation, including
the presentation related to the adoption of new guidance impacting the consolidated statements of cash flows (see
Note 3).
2.
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accounting policies below relate to reported amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial
statements.
Foreign Currency Translation—The consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. Dollars. Many
of the Company’s non-U.S. subsidiaries have a functional currency (i.e., the currency in which operational activities
are primarily conducted) that is other than the U.S. Dollar, generally the currency of the country in which such
subsidiaries are domiciled. Such subsidiaries’ assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. Dollars at year-end
exchange rates, while revenue and expenses are translated at average exchange rates during the year based on the
daily closing exchange rates. Adjustments that result from translating amounts from a subsidiary’s functional
currency to U.S. Dollars are reported in “accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax” (“AOCI”).
Foreign currency remeasurement gains and losses on transactions in non-functional currencies are included on the
consolidated statements of operations. Foreign currency remeasurement gains (losses), net of hedge transactions (see
Note 8) amounted to $(2,880), $1,900 and $(1,153) for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016,
respectively, and are included in “revenue-other” on the respective consolidated statements of operations.
Use of Estimates—The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP
requires the use of management’s estimates. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, management makes
estimates and assumptions regarding:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
valuations of assets and liabilities requiring fair value estimates including, but not limited to,
investments, derivatives, securities sold, not yet purchased and assumptions used to value pension and
other post-retirement plans;
the assessment of probability with respect to recognizing revenue;
the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts;
the realization of deferred tax assets and adequacy of tax reserves for uncertain tax positions;
the measurement of our tax receivable agreement obligation;
the outcome of litigation;
the carrying amount of goodwill and other intangible assets;
the vesting of share-based and other deferred compensation plan awards; and
other matters that affect the reported amounts and disclosure of contingencies in the consolidated
financial statements.
Estimates, by their nature, are based on judgment and available information. Therefore, actual results could
differ from those estimates and could have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
83
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
Cash and Cash Equivalents—The Company defines cash equivalents as short-term, highly liquid securities
and cash deposits with original maturities of 90 days or less when purchased.
Deposits with Banks and Short-Term Investments—Represents LFB’s short-term deposits, including with
the Banque de France and amounts placed by LFB in short-term, highly liquid securities with original maturities of
90 days or less when purchased. The level of these deposits and investments may be driven by the level of LFB time
and demand deposits (which can fluctuate significantly on a daily basis) and by changes in asset allocation.
Cash Deposited with Clearing Organizations and Other Segregated Cash—Primarily represents restricted
cash deposits made by the Company, including those to satisfy the requirements of clearing organizations.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts—We maintain an allowance for bad debts to provide for estimated losses
relating to fees and customer receivables. We determine the adequacy of the allowance by estimating the probability
of loss based on management’s analysis of the client’s creditworthiness and specifically reserve against exposures
where we determine the receivables may be impaired, which may include situations where a fee is in dispute or
litigation has commenced.
With respect to fees receivable from Financial Advisory activities, such receivables are generally deemed past
due when they are outstanding 60 days from the date of invoice. However, some Financial Advisory transactions
include specific contractual payment terms that may vary from one month to four years (as is the case for our
interest-bearing financing receivables) following the invoice date or may be subject to court approval (as is the case
with bankruptcy-related restructuring assignments). In such cases, receivables are deemed past due when payment is
not received by the agreed-upon contractual date or the court approval date, respectively. Financial Advisory fee
receivables past due in excess of 180 days are fully provided for unless there is evidence that the balance is
collectable. Asset Management fees are deemed past due and fully provided for when such receivables are
outstanding 12 months after the invoice date. Notwithstanding our policy for receivables past due, we specifically
reserve against exposures relating to Financial Advisory and Asset Management fees where we determine
receivables are impaired.
See Note 5 for additional information regarding receivables.
Investments—Investments in debt and marketable equity securities held either directly, or indirectly through
asset management funds, at the Company’s broker-dealer subsidiaries are accounted for at fair value, with any
increase or decrease in fair value recorded in earnings. Such amounts are reflected in “revenue-other” in the
consolidated statements of operations.
Investments in debt and marketable equity securities held at the Company’s non broker-dealer subsidiaries are
accounted for at fair value, with any increase or decrease in fair value reflected in “revenue-other” in the
consolidated statements of operations.
Investments also include interests in alternative investment funds and private equity funds, each accounted for
at fair value, as well as investments accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Any increases or
decreases in the carrying value of those investments accounted for at fair value and the Company’s share of net
income or losses pertaining to its equity method investments are reflected in “revenue-other” in the consolidated
statements of operations.
Dividend income is reflected in “revenue-other” on the consolidated statements of operations. Interest income
includes accretion or amortization of any discount or premium arising at acquisition of the related debt security.
Securities transactions and the related revenue and expenses are recorded on a “trade date” basis.
84
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
See Notes 6 and 7 for additional information regarding the Company’s investments.
Property-net—Property is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Buildings are
depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. Leasehold improvements are capitalized and are
amortized over the lesser of the economic useful life of the improvement or the term of the lease. Depreciation of
furniture and equipment, including computer hardware and software, is determined on a straight-line basis using
estimated useful lives. Depreciation and amortization expense aggregating $34,103, $31,498 and $33,264 for the
years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, is included on the respective consolidated statements
of operations in “occupancy and equipment” or “technology and information services”, depending on the nature of
the underlying asset. Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets—As goodwill has an indefinite life, it is required to be tested for
impairment annually or more frequently if circumstances indicate impairment may have occurred. The Company
performs a qualitative evaluation about whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less
than its carrying amount in lieu of actually calculating the fair value of the reporting unit.
The Company completed its annual goodwill review as of November 1, 2018, and determined that no
impairment existed.
Intangible assets that are not deemed to have an indefinite life are amortized over their estimated useful lives
and are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of
such assets may not be recoverable. The pattern of amortization reflects the timing of the realization of the economic
benefits of such intangible assets. For acquired customer contracts, the period of realization is deemed to be the
period when the related revenue is recognized. This analysis is performed by comparing the carrying value of the
intangible asset being reviewed for impairment to the current and expected future cash flows expected to be
generated from such asset on an undiscounted basis, including eventual disposition. An impairment loss would be
measured for the amount by which the carrying amount of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value.
See Note 10 with respect to goodwill and other intangible assets.
Derivative Instruments—A derivative is typically defined as an instrument whose value is “derived” from
underlying assets, indices or reference rates, such as a future, forward, swap, or option contract, or other financial
instrument with similar characteristics. Derivative contracts often involve future commitments to exchange interest
payment streams or currencies based on a notional or contractual amount (e.g., interest rate swaps or currency
forwards) or to purchase or sell other financial instruments at specified terms on a specified date (e.g., options to buy
or sell securities or currencies).
The Company enters into forward foreign currency exchange rate contracts, interest rate swaps, interest rate
futures, total return swap contracts on various equity and debt indices and other derivative contracts to economically
hedge exposures to fluctuations in currency exchange rates, interest rates and equity and debt prices. The Company
reports its derivative instruments separately as assets and liabilities unless a legal right of set-off exists under a
master netting agreement enforceable by law. The Company’s derivative instruments are recorded at their fair value,
and are included in “other assets” and “other liabilities” on the consolidated statements of financial condition. Gains
and losses on the Company’s derivative instruments are generally included in “interest income” and “interest
expense”, respectively, or “revenue-other”, depending on the nature of the underlying item, in the consolidated
statements of operations.
In addition to the derivative instruments described above, the Company records derivative liabilities relating to
its obligations pertaining to Lazard Fund Interests (“LFI”) and other similar deferred compensation arrangements,
the fair value of which is based on the value of the underlying investments, adjusted for estimated forfeitures, and is
included in “accrued compensation and benefits” in the consolidated statements of financial condition. Changes in
the fair value of the derivative liabilities are included in “compensation and benefits” in the consolidated statements
of operations, the impact of which equally offsets the changes in the fair value of investments which are currently
85
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
expected to be delivered upon settlement of LFI and other similar deferred compensation arrangements, which are
reported in “revenue-other” in the consolidated statements of operations. For information regarding LFI and other
similar deferred compensation arrangements, see Notes 6, 8 and 15.
Deposits and Other Customer Payables—Principally relates to LFB customer-related demand deposits, both
interest-bearing and non-interest bearing.
Securities Sold, Not Yet Purchased—Securities sold, not yet purchased represents liabilities for securities
sold for which payment has been received and the obligations to deliver such securities are included within “other
liabilities” in the consolidated statements of financial condition. These securities are accounted for at fair value, with
any increase or decrease in fair value recorded in earnings in accordance with standard securities industry practices.
Such gains and losses are reflected in “revenue-other” in the consolidated statements of operations.
Contingent Consideration Liabilities —The contingent consideration liabilities of businesses acquired in a
business combination are initially recorded at fair value, and any change in the fair value is recognized in
“amortization and other acquisition-related (benefits) costs” in the consolidated statements of operations. The
contingent consideration liability is included in “other liabilities” on the consolidated statements of financial
condition.
Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities—The majority of the Company’s financial assets and
liabilities are recorded at fair value or at amounts that approximate fair value. Such assets and liabilities include cash
and cash equivalents, deposits with banks and short-term investments, cash deposited with clearing organizations
and other segregated cash, receivables, investments (excluding investments accounted for at amortized cost, interest-
bearing deposits or using the equity method of accounting), derivative instruments, deposits and other customer
payables.
Revenue Recognition
Investment Banking and Other Advisory Fees and Asset Management Fees—See Note 4 for the Company’s
accounting policy on revenue recognition as it applies to investment banking and other advisory and asset
management fees.
Soft Dollar Arrangements—Certain entities within the Company’s Asset Management business obtain
research and other services through commission-sharing arrangements with broker-dealers, which are also known as
“soft dollar” arrangements. Consistent with the “soft dollar” safe harbor established by Section 28(e) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), the Asset Management business does not have
any contractual obligation or arrangement requiring it to pay for research and other eligible services obtained
through soft dollar arrangements with brokers. Instead, the provider is obligated to pay for the services.
Consequently, the Company does not incur any liability and does not accrue any expenses in connection with any
research or other eligible services obtained by the Asset Management business pursuant to such soft dollar
arrangements. For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company obtained research and other eligible services
through soft dollar arrangements valued at approximately $30,000. The use of soft dollars is limited by regulations
in the European Union and the U.K. and, as such, the Company intends to directly pay a portion of the costs of such
research and other eligible services going forward.
Equity-Based Incentive Compensation Awards—Equity-based incentive compensation awards that do not
require future service are expensed immediately. Equity-based compensation awards that require future service are
amortized over the applicable vesting period, or requisite service period, based on the fair value of the Company’s
Class A common stock on the date of grant. Compensation expense recognized for equity-based incentive
compensation is determined based on the number of awards that in the Company’s estimate are considered probable
of vesting (including as a result of any applicable performance conditions). Equity-based incentive compensation is
recognized in “compensation and benefits” expense.
86
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
Income Taxes—Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the
financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that
will be in effect when such differences are expected to reverse. Such temporary differences are reflected as deferred
tax assets and deferred tax liabilities on the consolidated statements of financial condition. A deferred tax asset is
recognized if it is more likely than not (defined as a likelihood of greater than 50%) that a tax benefit will be
accepted by a taxing authority.
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not
that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized and, when necessary, a valuation allowance is
established. The ultimate realization of the deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable
income during the periods in which temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the following
possible sources of taxable income when assessing the realization of deferred tax assets:
•
•
•
•
future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences;
future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards;
taxable income in prior carryback years; and
tax-planning strategies.
The assessment regarding whether a valuation allowance is required or should be adjusted also considers all
available information, including the following:
•
•
•
•
nature, frequency, magnitude and duration of any past losses and current operating results;
duration of statutory carryforward periods;
historical experience with tax attributes expiring unused; and
near-term and medium-term financial outlook.
The Company records tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return based upon the Company’s
estimates regarding the amount that is more likely than not to be realized or paid, including in connection with the
resolution of any related appeals or other legal processes. Accordingly, the Company recognizes liabilities for
certain unrecognized tax benefits based on the amounts that are more likely than not to be settled with the relevant
taxing authority.
The Company recognizes interest and/or penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in “provision for
income taxes”. See Note 17 for additional information relating to income taxes.
3.
RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS
Revenue from Contracts with Customers—In May 2014, the FASB issued comprehensive new revenue
recognition guidance. The guidance requires a company to recognize revenue when it transfers promised services to
customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for
those services and requires enhanced disclosures. The guidance also changes the accounting for certain contract
costs, including whether they may be offset against revenue in the consolidated statements of operations. The
Company adopted the revenue recognition guidance upon its effective date of January 1, 2018 using the modified
cumulative effect approach.
The Company evaluated the impact of the new guidance, including (i) the timing of revenue recognition for
Financial Advisory and Asset Management fees and (ii) the presentation of certain contract costs. With respect to
revenue recognition, the Company assessed the impact of the new guidance on the recognition of fees for Financial
Advisory (e.g., transaction completion, transaction announcement and retainers) and Asset Management (e.g.,
management and incentive fees), including the requirement under the new guidance to recognize certain transaction
87
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
completion fees in periods prior to the periods in which the applicable transactions close. The Company’s
assessment included an analysis of whether the Company’s fulfillment of its performance obligations would be
deemed to occur over time, or at specific points in time, under the new guidance. Specifically, recognition would be
deemed to occur over time if the client receives and consumes benefits from the services as the Company performs
the services. The Company concluded that Financial Advisory and Asset Management fees would typically be
recognized over time as performance occurs, subject to constraints, using an appropriate measure of progress, based
on resources consumed, which is consistent with when the client receives benefits. There was no material impact to
the Company’s recognition of revenue upon adoption of the new guidance.
The new guidance requires the Company to prospectively present certain contract costs on a gross basis. The
most significant changes with respect to presentation relate to (a) certain distribution costs within our Asset
Management business and (b) certain reimbursable deal costs within our Financial Advisory business, both of which
were previously presented net against revenues and are now presented as expenses on a gross basis under the new
guidance because the Company is primarily responsible for fulfilling the promise of the arrangement. For the year
ended December 31, 2018, the presentation of such costs on a gross basis resulted in an increase to net revenue of
$93,831, primarily comprised of increases to asset management fees and investment banking and other advisory
fees. In addition, there was a corresponding increase to operating expenses of $93,831, primarily comprised of an
increase to distribution costs presented within fund administration and outsourced services and an increase to
reimbursable deal costs presented within marketing and business development. These amounts would have been
presented on a net basis prior to the adoption of the new guidance, and there was no material impact to net income as
a result of the gross basis of presentation under the new guidance.
See Note 4 for further information on contracts within the scope of the new guidance.
Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments—In August and November 2016, the FASB
issued updated guidance which clarifies how a company should classify certain cash receipts and cash payments on
the statement of cash flows and clarifies that restricted cash should be included in the total of cash and cash
equivalents on the statement of cash flows. The Company adopted this new guidance on January 1, 2018, which
resulted in the reclassification of “cash deposited with clearing organizations and other segregated cash” and
“deposits with banks and short-term investments” from operating activities to components of “cash and cash
equivalents and restricted cash” on the consolidated statement of cash flows. In addition, the Company reclassified
cash flows related to customer deposits from operating activities to financing activities. This resulted in changes in
deposits with banks and short-term investments and customer deposits no longer being reflected in cash flows from
operating activities. Except for the reclassification of these items on the consolidated statement of cash flows for all
years presented, the new guidance had no impact on the Company’s financial statements.
Clarifying the Definition of a Business—In January 2017, the FASB issued updated guidance to clarify the
definition of a business within the context of business combinations. The updated guidance requires that when
substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable
asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, such asset or group of assets is not a business. This updated guidance
is expected to reduce the number of transactions that need to be further evaluated as business combinations. If
further evaluation is necessary, the updated guidance requires that a business set include, at a minimum, an input and
a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create output. The updated guidance
removes the evaluation of whether a market participant could replace missing elements. The Company adopted the
new guidance on January 1, 2018 and it did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
Compensation—Retirement Benefits—Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net
Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost—In March 2016, the FASB issued updated guidance on the presentation of net
benefit cost in the statement of operations and the components eligible for capitalization. The new guidance requires
that only the service cost component of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost be
presented with other employee compensation costs in operating expenses, applied on a retrospective basis. The other
components of net benefit cost, including amortization of prior service cost, and gains and losses from settlements
and curtailments, are included in other operating expenses. The new guidance also stipulates that only the service
88
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
cost component of net benefit cost is eligible for capitalization, applied on a prospective basis. The Company
adopted the new guidance on January 1, 2018 and there was no material impact to the Company’s financial
statements.
Compensation—Stock Compensation: Scope of Modification Accounting—In May 2017, the FASB issued
updated guidance on modifications to share-based payment awards. The updated guidance requires entities to
account for the effects of a modification to a share-based payment award unless the following are all the same
immediately before and after the modification: (i) the fair value of the award, (ii) the vesting conditions of the
award, and (iii) the classification of the award as an equity instrument or a liability instrument. The Company
adopted the new guidance on January 1, 2018, and there was no material impact to the Company’s financial
statements.
Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income—In February 2018,
the FASB issued updated guidance on the tax effects of items in AOCI. Specifically, the new guidance will permit,
but not require, a reclassification from AOCI to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the newly
enacted federal corporate income tax rate under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (see Note 17). The amount of the
reclassification would be the difference between the historical corporate income tax rate and the newly enacted 21%
corporate income tax rate. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after
December 15, 2018, with an option to apply it in the period of adoption or on a retrospective basis for each period in
which the effect of the change in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate is recognized. The Company will adopt
the new guidance on January 1, 2019 and does not expect a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
Leases—In February 2016, the FASB issued updated guidance for leases. The guidance requires a lessee to
(i) recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability that is initially measured at the present value of the lease
payments, in the consolidated statement of financial condition, (ii) recognize a single lease cost, calculated so that
the cost of the lease is allocated over the lease term on a straight-line basis and (iii) classify operating lease related
cash payments within operating activities and finance lease related principal cash payments within financing
activities (with interest included in interest paid) in the consolidated statement of cash flows.
The new guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The
Company will adopt the new guidance on January 1, 2019 using the optional transition method, which allows the
new standard to be applied initially at the adoption date with a cumulative-effect adjustment without restating
comparative periods. Lazard plans to elect the practical expedients, which allows the carry-forward of the prior
conclusions on lease definition, classification and initial direct costs related to the expired and existing leases as of
the adoption date. The Company expects to apply the exemption of balance sheet recognition requirements of short-
term leases.
The Company continues to evaluate its processes and internal controls over financial reporting relating to its
leasing activities. The Company currently estimates the recognition of the right-of-use assets and lease liabilities to
be approximately $500,000 to $600,000 on its consolidated statements of financial condition upon adoption and
does not expect a material impact on its consolidated statement of operations.
Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting—In June 2018, the FASB issued updated
guidance to simplify the accounting for nonemployee share-based payment transactions. The new guidance
generally requires equity-classified nonemployee share-based payment awards to be measured at the grant date,
which is the date at which a grantor and grantee reach a mutual understanding of the key terms and conditions of a
share-based payment award. This update generally aligns the accounting for equity-classified share-based payment
awards to nonemployees with the measurement date required for employees. The new guidance is effective for
annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Upon adoption, the new guidance would be applied
on a modified retrospective basis. The Company will adopt the new guidance on January 1, 2019 and does not
expect it to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
89
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
Financial Instruments—Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments—In June
2016, the FASB issued new guidance regarding the measurement of credit losses on financial instruments. The new
guidance replaces the incurred loss impairment methodology in the current guidance with a methodology that
reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable
information to determine credit loss estimates. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim periods
beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2018. The Company is currently evaluating the new guidance.
Intangibles—Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment—In January 2017, the
FASB issued updated guidance which eliminated Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Step 2 is the process of
measuring a goodwill impairment loss by comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the
carrying amount of that goodwill. The new guidance requires entities to measure a goodwill impairment loss as the
amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, limited to the carrying amount of goodwill.
The FASB also eliminated the requirements for entities that have reporting units with zero or negative carrying
amounts to perform a qualitative assessment for the goodwill impairment test. Instead, those entities would be
required to disclose the amount of goodwill allocated to each reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount.
The new guidance is effective for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed in fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the new guidance.
Intangibles—Internal-Use Software: Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud
Computing Arrangement that is a Service Contract—In August 2018, the FASB issued updated guidance on the
accounting for implementation costs incurred in a cloud computing arrangement. The new guidance requires the
capitalization of the implementation costs incurred in a cloud computing arrangement to be aligned with the
requirements for capitalizing costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. The new guidance is
effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption
permitted. Upon adoption, the Company may elect to apply the new guidance on either a prospective or
retrospective basis. The Company is currently evaluating the new guidance.
Related Party Guidance for Variable Interest Entities—In October 2018, the FASB issued updated guidance
that requires consideration of indirect interest held through related parties under common control for determining
whether fees paid to decision makers and service providers are variable interests. The new guidance is effective for
fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The amendments
are required to be applied retrospectively with a cumulative-effect adjustment. The Company is currently evaluating
the new guidance.
Fair Value Measurement: Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement—In August
2018, the FASB issued updated guidance which modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurement.
The updated guidance eliminates or modifies various required disclosures under the current guidance and includes
additional requirements. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the new guidance.
Compensation–Retirement Benefits: Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans—In
August 2018, the FASB issued updated guidance which modifies the disclosure requirements regarding defined
benefit plans and other postretirement plans. The updated guidance eliminates or clarifies certain currently required
disclosures and includes additional requirements. The new guidance is effective for annual and interim reporting
periods beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the
new guidance.
4.
REVENUE RECOGNITION
Investment Banking and Other Advisory Fees—Fees for Financial Advisory services are recorded when: (i) a
contract with a client has been identified, (ii) the performance obligations in the contract have been identified, (iii)
90
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
the fee or other transaction price has been determined, (iv) the fee or other transaction price has been allocated to
each performance obligation in the contract, and (v) the Company has satisfied the applicable performance
obligation. The expenses that are directly related to such transactions are recorded as incurred and presented within
operating expenses when the Company is primarily responsible for fulfilling the promise of the arrangement.
Revenues associated with the reimbursement of such expenses are recorded when the Company is contractually
entitled to reimbursement and presented within investment banking and other advisory fees.
Asset Management Fees—Fees for Asset Management services are primarily comprised of management fees
and incentive fees. Management fees are derived from fees for investment management and other services provided
to clients. Revenue is recorded in accordance with the same five criteria as Financial Advisory fees, which generally
results in management fees being recorded on a daily, monthly or quarterly basis, primarily based on a percentage of
client assets managed. Fees vary with the type of assets managed, with higher fees earned on equity assets,
alternative investment (such as hedge fund) and private equity funds, and lower fees earned on fixed income and
money market products. Expenses that are directly related to the sale or distribution of fund interests are recorded as
incurred and presented within operating expenses when the Company is primarily responsible for fulfilling the
promise of the arrangement. Revenues associated with the reimbursement of such expenses are recorded when the
Company is contractually entitled to reimbursement and presented within asset management fees.
In addition, the Company earns performance-based incentive fees on various investment products, including
traditional products and alternative investment funds such as hedge funds and private equity funds.
For hedge funds, incentive fees are calculated based on a specific percentage of a fund’s net appreciation, in
some cases in excess of established benchmarks or thresholds. The Company records incentive fees on traditional
products and hedge funds when a significant reversal in the amount of the cumulative revenue to be recognized is
not probable, which is typically at the end of the relevant performance measurement period. The incentive fee
measurement period is generally an annual period (unless an account is terminated during the year). The incentive
fees received at the end of the measurement period are not subject to reversal or payback. Incentive fees on hedge
funds generally are subject to loss carryforward provisions in which losses incurred by the hedge funds in any year
are applied against certain gains realized by the hedge funds in future periods before any incentive fees can be
earned.
For private equity funds, incentive fees may be earned in the form of a “carried interest” if profits arising from
realized investments exceed a specified threshold. Typically, such carried interest is ultimately calculated on a
whole-fund basis and, therefore, clawback of carried interests during the life of the fund can occur. As a result, the
Company records incentive fees earned on our private equity funds when a significant reversal in the amount of the
cumulative revenue to be recognized is not probable, which is typically at the end of the relevant performance
period.
Receivables relating to asset management and incentive fees are reported in “fees receivable” on the
consolidated statements of financial condition.
91
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
The Company disaggregates revenue based on its business segment results and believes that the following
information provides a reasonable representation of how performance obligations relate to the nature, amount,
timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows:
Net Revenue:
Financial Advisory (a) .........................................................................................................
Asset Management:
Management Fees and Other (b) .......................................................................................
Incentive Fees (c) ..............................................................................................................
Total Asset Management .....................................................................................................
Year Ended
December 31, 2018 (d)
$
$
$
1,555,526
1,311,286
20,515
1,331,801
(a) Financial Advisory is comprised of M&A Advisory, Capital Advisory, Capital Raising, Restructuring,
Shareholder Advisory, Sovereign Advisory, and other strategic advisory work for clients. The benefits of these
advisory services are generally transferred to the Company’s clients over time, and consideration for these
advisory services typically includes transaction completion, transaction announcement and retainer fees.
Retainer fees are generally fixed and recognized over the period in which the advisory services are performed.
However, transaction announcement and transaction completion fees are variable and subject to constraints, and
they are typically not recognized until there is an announcement date or a completion date, respectively, due to
the uncertainty associated with those events. Therefore, in any given period, advisory fees recognized for
certain transactions will relate to services performed in prior periods. The advisory fees that may be
unrecognized as of the end of a reporting period, primarily comprised of fees associated with transaction
announcements and transaction completions, generally remain unrecognized due to the uncertainty associated
with those events.
(b) Management fees and other is primarily comprised of management services. The benefits of these management
services are transferred to the Company’s clients over time. Consideration for these management services
generally includes management fees, which are based on assets under management and recognized over the
period in which the management services are performed. The selling or distribution of fund interests is a
separate performance obligation within management fees and other, and the benefits of such services are
transferred to the Company’s clients at the point in time that such fund interests are sold or distributed.
(c) Incentive fees is primarily comprised of management services. The benefits of these management services are
transferred to the Company’s clients over time. Consideration for these management services is generally
variable and includes performance or incentive fees. The fees allocated to these management services that are
unrecognized as of the end of the reporting period are generally amounts that are subject to constraints due to
the uncertainty associated with performance targets and clawbacks.
(d) In addition to the above, contracts with clients include trade-based commission income, which is recognized at
the point in time of execution and presented within other revenue. Such income may be earned by providing
trade facilitation, execution, clearance and settlement, custody, and trade administration services to clients.
With regard to the disclosure requirement for remaining performance obligations, the Company elected the
practical expedients permitted in the guidance to (i) exclude contracts with a duration of one year or less; and (ii)
exclude variable consideration, such as transaction completion and transaction announcement fees, that is allocated
entirely to unsatisfied performance obligations. Excluded variable consideration typically relates to contracts with a
duration of one year or less, and is generally constrained due to uncertainties. Therefore, when applying the practical
expedients, amounts related to remaining performance obligations are not material to the Company’s financial
statements.
92
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
5.
RECEIVABLES
The Company’s receivables represent fee receivables, amounts due from customers and other receivables.
Receivables are stated net of an estimated allowance for doubtful accounts, for past due amounts and for
specific accounts deemed uncollectible, which may include situations where a fee is in dispute.
Activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was as
follows:
Beginning Balance ................................................................. $
Bad debt expense, net of recoveries .......................................
Charge-offs, foreign currency translation and other
adjustments..........................................................................
Ending Balance ...................................................................... $
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2018
23,746 $
27,164
16,386
$
15,419
12,882
10,055
(10,746)
40,164 $
(8,059)
23,746 $
(6,551)
16,386
Bad debt expense, net of recoveries is included in “operating expenses - other” on the consolidated statements
of operations.
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company had receivables past due or deemed uncollectible of $42,309
and $34,865, respectively.
Of the Company’s fee receivables at December 31, 2018 and 2017, $90,966 and $80,536, respectively,
represented interest-bearing financing receivables. Based upon our historical loss experience, the credit quality of
the counterparties, and the lack of past due or uncollectible amounts, there was no allowance for doubtful accounts
required at those dates related to such receivables.
The aggregate carrying amount of our non-interest bearing receivables of $594,568 and $491,080 at
December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, approximates fair value.
93
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
6.
INVESTMENTS
The Company’s investments and securities sold, not yet purchased, consist of the following at December 31,
2018 and 2017:
Interest-bearing deposits ..................................................................................... $
Debt .....................................................................................................................
Equities................................................................................................................
Funds:
Alternative investments (a)............................................................................
Debt (a) ..........................................................................................................
Equity (a) .......................................................................................................
Private equity.................................................................................................
Total investments ................................................................................................
Less:
Interest-bearing deposits................................................................................
Investments, at fair value .................................................................................... $
Securities sold, not yet purchased, at fair value
(included in “other liabilities”) ........................................................................ $
December 31,
2018
2017
510 $
202,874
32,261
17,752
90,320
175,088
56,343
339,503
575,148
510
574,638 $
556
6
45,257
20,993
84,077
199,618
76,679
381,367
427,186
556
426,630
3,929 $
7,338
(a)
Interests in alternative investment funds, debt funds and equity funds include investments with fair values of
$9,741, $60,081 and $132,038, respectively, at December 31, 2018 and $11,213, $48,391 and $131,893,
respectively, at December 31, 2017, held in order to satisfy the Company’s liability upon vesting of previously
granted LFI and other similar deferred compensation arrangements. LFI represent grants by the Company to
eligible employees of actual or notional interests in a number of Lazard-managed funds, subject to service-
based vesting conditions (see Notes 8 and 15).
Interest-bearing deposits have original maturities of greater than three months but equal to or less than one
year and are carried at cost that approximates fair value due to their short-term maturities.
Debt primarily consists of U.S. Treasury securities with original maturities of greater than three months and
less than one year.
Equities primarily consist of seed investments invested in marketable equity securities of large-, mid- and
small-cap domestic, international and global companies held within separately managed accounts related to our
Asset Management business.
Alternative investment funds primarily consist of interests in various Lazard-managed hedge funds, funds of
funds and mutual funds. Such amounts primarily consist of seed investments in funds related to our Asset
Management business and amounts related to LFI discussed above.
Debt funds primarily consist of seed investments in funds related to our Asset Management business that
invest in debt securities, amounts related to LFI discussed above and an investment in a Lazard-managed debt fund.
Equity funds primarily consist of seed investments in funds related to our Asset Management business that
invest in equity securities, and amounts related to LFI discussed above.
94
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
Private equity investments include those owned by Lazard and those consolidated but not owned by Lazard.
Private equity investments owned by Lazard are primarily comprised of investments in private equity funds. Such
investments primarily include (i) Edgewater Growth Capital Partners III, L.P. (“EGCP III”), a fund primarily
making equity and buyout investments in middle market companies and (ii) a fund targeting significant
noncontrolling-stake investments in established private companies.
Private equity investments consolidated but not owned by Lazard relate to the economic interests that are
owned by the management team and other investors in the Edgewater Funds (“Edgewater”).
During the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, the Company reported in “revenue-other” on its
consolidated statements of operations net unrealized investment gains and losses pertaining to “equity securities and
trading debt securities” still held as of the reporting date as follows:
Net unrealized investment gains (losses) .......................................... $
27,192 $
11,816
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2018
(43,009) $
7.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair Value Hierarchy of Investments and Certain Other Assets and Liabilities—Lazard categorizes its
investments and certain other assets and liabilities recorded at fair value into a three-level fair value hierarchy as
follows:
Level 1. Assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in
an active market that Lazard has the ability to access.
Level 2. Assets and liabilities whose values are based on (i) quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in an active
market, or quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in non-active markets, or (ii) inputs other
than quoted prices that are directly observable or derived principally from, or corroborated by, market data.
Level 3. Assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are
both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. These inputs reflect our own
assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability. Items
included in Level 3 include securities or other financial assets whose trading volume and level of activity have
significantly decreased when compared with normal market activity and there is no longer sufficient
frequency or volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
The fair value of debt is classified as Level 1 when the fair values are based on unadjusted quoted prices in
active markets.
The fair value of equities is classified as Level 1 or Level 3 as follows: marketable equity securities are
classified as Level 1 and are valued based on the last trade price on the primary exchange for that security as
provided by external pricing services; equity securities in private companies are generally classified as Level 3.
The fair value of investments in alternative investment funds, debt funds and equity funds is classified as
Level 1 when the fair values are primarily based on the publicly reported closing price for the fund.
The fair value of securities sold, not yet purchased, is classified as Level 1 when the fair values are based on
unadjusted quoted prices in active markets.
\The fair value of the contingent consideration liability is classified as Level 3 and the fair value of the liability
is remeasured at each reporting period. The inputs used to derive the fair value of the contingent consideration
include the application of probabilities when assessing certain performance thresholds for the relevant periods. Any
change in the fair value is recognized in “amortization and other acquisition-related (benefits) costs” in the
95
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
consolidated statement of operations. Our business acquisitions may involve the potential payment of contingent
consideration upon the achievement of certain performance thresholds. The contingent consideration liability is
initially recorded at fair value of the contingent payments on the acquisition date and is included in “other liabilities”
on the consolidated statements of financial condition. See Note 13.
The fair value of derivatives entered into by the Company is classified as Level 2 and is based on the values of
the related underlying assets, indices or reference rates as follows: the fair value of forward foreign currency
exchange rate contracts is a function of the spot rate and the interest rate differential of the two currencies from the
trade date to settlement date; the fair value of total return swaps is based on the change in fair value of the related
underlying equity security, financial instrument or index and a specified notional holding; the fair value of interest
rate swaps is based on the interest rate yield curve; and the fair value of derivative liabilities related to LFI and other
similar deferred compensation arrangements is based on the value of the underlying investments, adjusted for
forfeitures. See Note 8.
Investments Measured at Net Asset Value (“NAV”)—As a practical expedient, the Company uses NAV or its
equivalent to measure the fair value of certain investments. NAV is primarily determined based on information
provided by external fund administrators. The Company’s investments valued at NAV as a practical expedient in (i)
alternative investment funds, debt funds and equity funds are redeemable in the near term, and (ii) private equity
funds are not redeemable in the near term as a result of redemption restrictions.
The following tables present, as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the classification of (i) investments and
certain other assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis within the fair value hierarchy and (ii)
investments measured at NAV or its equivalent as a practical expedient:
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
NAV
Total
December 31, 2018
Assets:
Investments:
Debt...................................................................... $ 202,874 $
Equities.................................................................
Funds:
30,639
- $
-
- $
1,622
- $ 202,874
32,261
-
16,863
Alternative investments ..................................
Debt ................................................................
90,313
Equity ............................................................. 175,054
-
Private equity..................................................
-
Derivatives.................................................................
-
-
-
-
11,967
Total ..................................................................... $ 515,743 $ 11,967 $
889
7
-
-
-
-
-
17,752
90,320
34 175,088
56,343
11,967
1,622 $ 57,273 $ 586,605
56,343
-
Liabilities:
Securities sold, not yet purchased ............................. $
Contingent consideration liability .............................
Derivatives.................................................................
Total ..................................................................... $
- $
3,929 $
-
-
- 188,962
- $
10,009
-
3,929 $ 188,962 $ 10,009 $
3,929
- $
10,009
-
- 188,962
- $ 202,900
96
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
Level 1
Level 2
December 31, 2017
Level 3
NAV
Total
Assets:
Investments:
Debt...................................................................... $
Equities.................................................................
Funds:
6 $
43,665
- $
-
- $
1,592
- $
-
6
45,257
17,353
Alternative investments ..................................
Debt ................................................................
84,071
Equity ............................................................. 199,565
-
Private equity..................................................
-
Derivatives.................................................................
Total ..................................................................... $ 344,660 $
-
-
-
-
3,732
3,732 $
3,640
6
-
-
-
-
-
20,993
84,077
53 199,618
76,679
3,732
1,592 $ 80,378 $ 430,362
76,679
-
Liabilities:
Securities sold, not yet purchased ............................. $
Contingent consideration liability .............................
Derivatives.................................................................
Total ..................................................................... $
- $
7,338 $
-
-
- 198,417
- $
28,941
-
7,338 $ 198,417 $ 28,941 $
7,338
- $
-
28,941
- 198,417
- $ 234,696
The following tables provide a summary of changes in fair value of the Company’s Level 3 assets and
liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016:
Year Ended December 31, 2018
Net Unrealized/
Realized
Gains/Losses
Included In
Earnings (a)
Beginning
Balance
Purchases/
Acquisitions
Sales/
Dispositions/
Settlements
Foreign
Currency
Translation
Adjustments
Ending
Balance
Assets:
Investments:
Equities ...................................................... $ 1,592 $
Total Level 3 Assets .................................. $ 1,592 $
61 $
61 $
Liabilities:
Contingent consideration liability.............. $ 28,941 $
Total Level 3 Liabilities............................. $ 28,941 $
(18,932) $
(18,932) $
1 $
1 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
- $
(32) $ 1,622
(32) $ 1,622
- $ 10,009
- $ 10,009
Year Ended December 31, 2017
Net Unrealized/
Realized
Gains/Losses
Included In
Earnings (a)
Beginning
Balance
Sales/
Dispositions/
Settlements
Foreign
Currency
Translation
Adjustments
Ending
Balance
Purchases/
Acquisitions
Assets:
Investments:
Equities ...................................................... $ 1,508 $
Total Level 3 Assets .................................. $ 1,508 $
14 $
14 $
1,661 $
1,661 $
(1,669) $
(1,669) $
78 $ 1,592
78 $ 1,592
Liabilities:
Contingent consideration liability ............. $ 22,608 $
Total Level 3 Liabilities ............................ $ 22,608 $
6,582 $
6,582 $
- $
- $
(249) $
(249) $
- $ 28,941
- $ 28,941
97
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
Year Ended December 31, 2016
Net Unrealized/
Realized
Gains/Losses
Included In
Earnings (a)
Beginning
Balance
Purchases/
Acquisitions
Sales/
Dispositions/
Settlements
Foreign
Currency
Translation
Adjustments
Ending
Balance
Assets:
Investments:
Equities ...................................................... $ 1,276 $
Total Level 3 Assets .................................. $ 1,276 $
248 $
248 $
- $
- $
- $
- $
(16) $ 1,508
(16) $ 1,508
Liabilities:
Contingent consideration liability.............. $
Total Level 3 Liabilities............................. $
- $
- $
32,725 $
32,725 $
19,950 $ (30,067) $
19,950 $ (30,067) $
- $22,608
- $22,608
(a)
Earnings recorded in “other revenue” for investments in equities for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017
and 2016 include net unrealized gains of $61, $12 and $243, respectively. Earnings recorded in “amortization
and other acquisition-related (benefits) costs” for the contingent consideration liability for the years ended
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 include unrealized (gains) losses of $(18,932), $6,582 and $2,658,
respectively, and, for the year ended December 31, 2016, realized losses of $30,067 due to the change in the
fair value of contingent consideration associated with the Edgewater business acquisition.
There were no transfers between any of the Level 1, 2 and 3 categories in the fair value measurement
hierarchy during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Financial Instruments Not Measured at Fair Value—The tables below present the carrying value, fair value
and fair value hierarchy category of certain financial instruments as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 that are not
measured at fair value in the Company’s consolidated statement of financial condition, and excludes certain
financial instruments such as equity method investments.
December 31, 2018
Fair Value Measurements Using:
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Fair Value
Carrying
Value
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents.......................... $ 1,246,537 $ 1,246,537 $ 1,246,537 $
Deposits with banks and short-term
investments.............................................. 1,006,969 1,006,969 1,006,969
Cash deposited with clearing
organizations and other segregated
cash..........................................................
Interest-bearing financing receivables .......
Interest-bearing deposits (included within
investments) ............................................
Financial Liabilities:
Deposits and other customer payables ....... $ 1,154,207 $ 1,154,207 $ 1,154,207 $
Senior debt.................................................. 1,434,260 1,429,280
38,379
-
38,379
91,765
38,379
90,966
510
510
510
- $
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
91,765
-
-
-
- $
- 1,429,280
98
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
December 31, 2017
Fair Value Measurements Using:
Quoted
Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
Significant
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
Fair Value
Carrying
Value
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
935,431
Financial Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents .......................... $ 1,483,836 $ 1,483,836 $ 1,483,836 $
Deposits with banks and short-term
investments .................................................
Cash deposited with clearing
organizations and other segregated
cash ..........................................................
Interest-bearing financing receivables........
Interest-bearing deposits (included within
investments).............................................
Financial Liabilities:
Deposits and other customer payables........ $
992,338 $
Senior debt .................................................. 1,190,383 1,230,254
35,539
-
35,539
82,492
35,539
80,536
992,338 $
992,338 $
935,431
935,431
556
556
556
- $
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
82,492
-
-
-
- $
- 1,230,254
Cash and cash equivalents are carried at either cost or amortized cost that approximates fair value due to their
short-term maturities.
The carrying value of deposits with banks and short-term investments, and cash deposited with clearing
organizations and other segregated cash, approximates fair value because of the relatively short period of time
between their origination and expected maturity.
Fair values of interest-bearing financing receivables were generally determined by discounting both principal
and interest cash flows expected to be collected, using a discount rate approximating current market interest rates for
comparable financial instruments and based on unobservable inputs.
The carrying value of deposits and other customer payables and investments accounted for at amortized cost,
such as interest-bearing deposits, approximate fair value due to their short-term nature.
The Company’s senior debt is carried at historical amounts. The fair value of the Company’s senior debt is
based on market quotations.
99
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
The following tables present, at December 31, 2018 and 2017, certain investments that are valued using NAV
or its equivalent as a practical expedient in determining fair value:
December 31, 2018
Estimated Liquidation Period of
Investments Not Redeemable
Investments
Redeemable
Fair Value
Unfunded
Commitments
% of
Fair Value
Not
Redeemable
%
Next
5 Years
%
5-10
Years
%
Thereafter
Redemption
Frequency
Redemption
Notice Period
Alternative investment funds:
Hedge funds ..................
$
Funds of funds...............
Other .............................
Debt funds ...........................
Equity funds ........................
Private equity funds:
299 $
23
567
7
34
-
-
-
-
-
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(a) 30-60 days
>90 days
(b)
(c) <30-30 days
(d)
<30 days
(e) <30-90 days
Equity growth................
Total.....................................
56,343
$ 57,273 $
8,338 (f)
8,338
100%
14%
34%
52%
NA
NA
(a) monthly (100%)
quarterly (100%)
(b)
daily (6%) and monthly ( 94%)
(c)
daily (100%)
(d)
daily (25%), monthly (70%) and annually (5%)
(e)
Unfunded commitments to private equity investments consolidated but not owned by Lazard of $14,437 are
(f)
excluded. Such commitments are required to be funded by capital contributions from noncontrolling interest
holders.
December 31, 2017
Estimated Liquidation Period of
Investments Not Redeemable
Investments
Redeemable
Fair Value
Unfunded
Commitments
% of
Fair Value
Not
Redeemable
%
Next
5 Years
%
5-10
Years
%
Thereafter
Redemption
Frequency
Redemption
Notice Period
Alternative investment funds:
Hedge funds ..................
$
Funds of funds...............
Other .............................
Debt funds ...........................
Equity funds ........................
Private equity funds:
2,517 $
528
595
6
53
-
-
-
-
-
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(a) <30-60 days
(b) <30-90 days
(c) <30-60 days
30 days
(d)
(e) <30-90 days
Equity growth................
Total.....................................
76,679
$ 80,378 $
10,300 (f)
10,300
100%
16%
38%
46%
NA
NA
(a) weekly (3%), monthly (5%) and quarterly (92%)
(b) monthly (97%) and quarterly (3%)
daily (6%) and monthly (94%)
(c)
daily (100%)
(d)
daily (18%), monthly (50%) and quarterly (32%)
(e)
Unfunded commitments to private equity investments consolidated but not owned by Lazard of $5,902 are
(f)
excluded. Such commitments are required to be funded by capital contributions from noncontrolling interest
holders.
100
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
Investment Capital Funding Commitments—At December 31, 2018, the Company’s maximum unfunded
commitments for capital contributions to investment funds primarily arose from commitments to EGCP III, which
amounted to $7,602. The investment period for EGCP III ended on October 12, 2016, after which point the
Company’s obligation to fund capital contributions for new investments in EGCP III expired. The Company remains
obligated until October 12, 2023 (or any earlier liquidation of EGCP III) to make capital contributions necessary to
fund follow-on investments and to pay for fund expenses.
8.
DERIVATIVES
The table below presents the fair value of the Company’s derivative instruments reported within “other assets”
and “other liabilities” and the fair value of the Company’s derivative liabilities relating to its obligations pertaining
to LFI and other similar deferred compensation arrangements reported within “accrued compensation and benefits”
(see Note 15) on the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition as of December 31, 2018 and
2017:
Derivative Assets:
Forward foreign currency exchange rate contracts........................................ $
Total return swaps and other (a) ....................................................................
$
Derivative Liabilities:
Forward foreign currency exchange rate contracts........................................ $
Total return swaps and other (a) ....................................................................
LFI and other similar deferred compensation arrangements .........................
$
December 31,
2018
2017
1,543
10,424
11,967
939
1
188,022
188,962
$
$
$
$
3,314
418
3,732
4,846
11,270
182,301
198,417
(a)
For total return swaps, amounts represent the netting of gross derivative assets and liabilities of $10,792 and
$369 as of December 31, 2018, respectively, and $469 and $11,321 as of December 31, 2017, respectively, for
contracts with the same counterparty under legally enforceable master netting agreements. Such amounts are
recorded “net” in “other assets”, with receivables for net cash collateral under such contracts of $17,616 as of
December 31, 2017.
Net gains (losses) with respect to derivative instruments (predominantly reflected in “revenue-other”) and the
Company’s derivative liabilities relating to its obligations pertaining to LFI and other similar deferred compensation
arrangements (included in “compensation and benefits” expense) as reflected on the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, were as follows:
Forward foreign currency exchange rate contracts ........................... $
LFI and other similar deferred compensation arrangements.............
Total return swaps and other .............................................................
Total .................................................................................................. $
7,584 $
14,086
8,813
30,483 $
(9,144) $
(23,526)
(15,709)
(48,379) $
(2,253)
(3,318)
(4,636)
(10,207)
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2018
101
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
9.
PROPERTY
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, property consisted of the following:
Estimated
Depreciable
Life in Years
December 31,
2018
2017
Buildings .....................................................................
Leasehold improvements ............................................
Furniture and equipment .............................................
Construction in progress .............................................
Total.......................................................................
Less - Accumulated depreciation and amortization....
Property.......................................................................
33 $ 145,034 $ 151,912
3-20 188,956 173,102
3-10 204,585 183,541
14,573
14,141
552,716 523,128
339,770 317,827
$ 212,946 $ 205,301
10. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The components of goodwill and other intangible assets at December 31, 2018 and 2017 are presented below:
December 31,
2018
2017
Goodwill........................................................................ $ 371,561 $ 385,292
Other intangible assets (net of accumulated
amortization) ..............................................................
3,757
6,072
$ 375,318 $ 391,364
At December 31, 2018 and 2017, goodwill of $307,020 and $320,751, respectively, was attributable to the
Company’s Financial Advisory segment and, at each such respective date, $64,541 of goodwill was attributable to
the Company’s Asset Management segment.
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 are as
follows:
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2018
Balance, January 1............................................ $ 385,292 $ 373,117 $ 320,761
- 54,631
Business acquisitions........................................
Foreign currency translation adjustments ........ (13,731) 12,175
(2,275)
Balance, December 31...................................... $ 371,561 $ 385,292 $ 373,117
-
All changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 are
attributable to the Company’s Financial Advisory segment.
The Company evaluates goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently if circumstances indicate that
impairment may have occurred. Pursuant to the Company’s goodwill impairment review for the years ended
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, the Company determined that no impairment existed.
102
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
The gross cost and accumulated amortization of other intangible assets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, by
major intangible asset category, are as follows:
December 31, 2018
December 31, 2017
Success/incentive fees ...................................... $ 35,232 $
Management fees, customer relationships and
non-compete agreements ............................... 34,474
$ 69,706 $
Gross
Cost
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Carrying
Amount
32,235 $ 2,997 $ 35,422 $
Gross
Cost
Accumulated
Amortization
Net
Carrying
Amount
29,723 $ 5,699
33,714
760 33,749
65,949 $ 3,757 $ 69,171 $
33,376
373
63,099 $ 6,072
Amortization expense of intangible assets, included in “amortization and other acquisition-related (benefits)
costs” in the consolidated statements of operations, for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 was
$3,035, $2,932 and $2,522, respectively. Estimated future amortization expense is as follows:
Year Ending December 31,
2019.............................................................................................................................................. $
2020..............................................................................................................................................
2021..............................................................................................................................................
2022..............................................................................................................................................
2023..............................................................................................................................................
Total amortization expense .......................................................................................................... $
Amortization
Expense
1,720
1,699
150
150
38
3,757
11. OTHER ASSETS AND OTHER LIABILITIES
The following table sets forth the Company’s other assets, by type, as of December 31, 2018 and 2017:
Current income and other tax receivables .............................................. $
Prepaid compensation (see Note 15) ......................................................
Other advances and prepayments ...........................................................
Other.......................................................................................................
Total ....................................................................................................... $
35,439 $
76,362
66,266
80,567
258,634 $
38,804
60,355
56,595
72,390
228,144
December 31,
2018
2017
The following table sets forth the Company’s other liabilities, by type, as of December 31, 2018 and 2017:
Accrued expenses ................................................................................... $
Current income taxes and other taxes ....................................................
Employee benefit-related liabilities .......................................................
Deferred lease liabilities.........................................................................
Unclaimed funds at LFB ........................................................................
Deferred revenue (a)...............................................................................
Contingent consideration liability ..........................................................
Securities sold, not yet purchased ..........................................................
Other.......................................................................................................
Total ....................................................................................................... $
December 31,
2018
166,112 $
130,261
51,051
84,449
17,746
80,995
10,009
3,929
32,434
576,986 $
2017
155,551
123,548
69,201
85,028
14,962
45,390
28,941
7,338
43,629
573,588
103
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
(a)
The change in deferred revenue during the year ended December 31, 2018 principally relates to additional
carried interest received from private equity investments that is subject to clawback. The revenue recognized
during the current year related to the deferred revenue balance as of the beginning of the year was not material
to the consolidated financial statements.
12.
SENIOR DEBT
Senior debt is comprised of the following as of December 31, 2018 and 2017:
Initial
Principal
Amount
Maturity
Date
Annual
Interest
Rate(b)
December 31, 2018
Unamortized
Debt Costs
Carrying
Value
Principal
December 31, 2017
Unamortized
Debt Costs
Carrying
Value
Principal
Outstanding as of
Lazard Group
2020 Senior
Notes (a) ..... $500,000 11/14/20 4.25% $ 250,000 $
Lazard Group
2025 Senior
Notes ........... 400,000 2/13/25 3.75%
Lazard Group
2027 Senior
Notes (a) ..... 300,000 3/1/27 3.625%
Lazard Group
2028 Senior
Notes (a) ..... 500,000 9/19/28 4.50%
400,000
300,000
500,000
$1,450,000 $
Total .........
863 $ 249,137 $ 500,000 $
2,647 $ 497,353
2,888
397,112
400,000
3,361
396,639
3,215
296,785
300,000
3,609
296,391
8,774
-
491,226
15,740 $1,434,260 $1,200,000 $
-
-
9,617 $1,190,383
(a)
In September 2018, Lazard Group completed an offering of $500,000 aggregate principal amount of 4.50%
senior notes due 2028 (the “2028 Notes”). Interest on the 2028 Notes is payable semi-annually on March 19
and September 19 of each year, beginning March 19, 2019. Lazard Group used a portion of the net proceeds
of the 2028 Notes to redeem or otherwise retire $250,000 aggregate principal amount of the 4.25% senior
notes due 2020 (the “2020 Notes”), which, including the recognition of unamortized issuance costs, resulted in
a loss on debt extinguishment of $6,523. Such loss on debt extinguishment was recorded in “operating
expenses—other” on the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018.
During November 2016, Lazard Group completed an offering of $300,000 aggregate principal amount of
3.625% senior notes due 2027 (the “2027 Notes”). Interest on the 2027 Notes is payable semi-annually on
March 1 and September 1 of each year, beginning March 1, 2017. Lazard Group used a portion of the net
proceeds of the 2027 Notes to redeem or otherwise retire all $98,350 of the 6.85% senior notes due June 2017
(the “2017 Notes”), which, including the recognition of unamortized issuance costs, resulted in a loss on debt
extinguishment of $3,148. Such loss on debt extinguishment was recorded in “operating expenses—other” on
the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016.
(b)
The effective interest rates of Lazard Group’s 2020 Notes, the 3.75% senior notes due February 13, 2025 (the
“2025 Notes”), the 2027 Notes and the 2028 Notes are 4.43%, 3.87%, 3.76% and 4.68%, respectively.
On September 25, 2015, Lazard Group entered into an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement for a five-
year $150,000 senior revolving credit facility with a group of lenders (the “Amended and Restated Credit
Agreement”), which expires in September 2020. The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement amended and
restated the previous credit agreement dated September 25, 2012. Borrowings under the Amended and Restated
Credit Agreement generally will bear interest at LIBOR plus an applicable margin for specific interest periods
104
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
determined based on Lazard Group’s highest credit rating from an internationally recognized credit agency. At
December 31, 2018 and 2017, no amounts were outstanding under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement.
The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, the indenture and the supplemental indentures relating to
Lazard Group’s senior notes contain certain covenants, events of default and other customary provisions, including a
customary make-whole provision in the event of early redemption, where applicable. As of December 31, 2018, the
Company was in compliance with such provisions. All of the Company’s senior debt obligations are unsecured.
Debt maturities relating to senior borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2018 for each of the five years in
the period ending December 31, 2023 and thereafter are set forth in the table below.
Year Ending December 31,
2019................................................................................................................ $
2020................................................................................................................
2021 - 2023 ....................................................................................................
Thereafter.......................................................................................................
Total.......................................................................................................... $
-
250,000
-
1,200,000
1,450,000
The Company’s senior debt at December 31, 2018 and 2017 is carried at historical amounts. See Note 7 for
information regarding the fair value and fair value hierarchy category of the Company’s senior debt.
As of December 31, 2018, the Company had approximately $168,000 in unused lines of credit available to it,
including the credit facility provided under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and unused lines of credit
available to LFB of approximately $17,000.
13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Leases—The Company leases office space and equipment under non-cancelable lease agreements, which
expire on various dates through 2033.
Operating lease agreements, in addition to base rentals, generally are subject to escalation provisions based on
certain costs incurred by the landlord. For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, aggregate rental
expense relating to operating leases amounted to $84,636, $84,632 and $76,704, respectively, and is included in
“occupancy and equipment” or “technology and information services” on the consolidated statements of operations,
depending on the nature of the underlying asset. The Company also subleases office space under agreements which
expire on various dates through 2022. Sublease income from such agreements was $7,519, $7,659 and $7,858 for
the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Capital lease obligations recorded under sale/leaseback transactions were paid in 2017.
105
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
At December 31, 2018, minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases, net of sublease
income, are approximately as follows:
Year Ending December 31,
2019 ....................................................................................................... $
2020 .......................................................................................................
2021 .......................................................................................................
2022 .......................................................................................................
2023 .......................................................................................................
Thereafter ..............................................................................................
Total minimum rental commitments .....................................................
Less - sublease proceeds........................................................................
Net rental commitments ........................................................................ $
86,839
89,445
83,701
70,780
59,973
488,612
879,350
26,941
852,409
In August 2018, the Company entered into a lease agreement for additional office facilities, which are
currently under construction, with delivery anticipated in the third quarter of 2019. Operating lease commitments in
the table above include the impact of the new lease agreement.
Guarantees—In the normal course of business, LFB provides indemnifications to third parties to protect them
in the event of non-performance by its clients. At December 31, 2018, LFB had $4,991 of such indemnifications and
held $4,947 of collateral/counter-guarantees to secure these commitments. The Company believes the likelihood of
loss with respect to these indemnities is remote. Accordingly, no liability is recorded in the consolidated statement
of financial condition.
Business Acquisitions—For businesses acquired in 2016, the remaining consideration consists of (i) 40,524
shares of Class A common stock subject to non-compete provisions and employment conditions, and non-contingent
interests exchangeable into 202,984 shares of Class A common stock, and (ii) up to 810,742 additional shares of
Class A common stock that are subject to certain performance thresholds, as well as applicable related dividend
equivalent amounts. During the year ended December 31, 2018, 20,293 of the contingent shares were earned.
Other Commitments—The Company has various other contractual commitments arising in the ordinary
course of business. In addition, from time to time, each of LFB and LFNY may enter into underwriting
commitments in which it will participate as an underwriter. At December 31, 2018, LFB and LFNY had no such
underwriting commitments.
See Notes 7 and 16 for information regarding commitments relating to investment capital funding
commitments and obligations to fund our pension plans, respectively.
In the opinion of management, the fulfillment of the commitments described herein will not have a material
adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
Legal—The Company is involved from time to time in judicial, regulatory and arbitration proceedings and
inquiries concerning matters arising in connection with the conduct of our businesses, including proceedings
initiated by former employees alleging wrongful termination. The Company reviews such matters on a case-by-case
basis and establishes any required accrual if a loss is probable and the amount of such loss can be reasonably
estimated. The Company experiences significant variation in its revenue and earnings on a quarterly basis.
Accordingly, the results of any pending matter or matters could be significant when compared to the Company’s
earnings in any particular fiscal quarter. The Company believes, however, based on currently available information,
that the results of any pending matters, in the aggregate, will not have a material effect on its business or financial
condition.
106
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
14.
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Share Repurchase Program—During the year ended December 31, 2018 and since 2015, the Board of
Directors of Lazard authorized the repurchase of Class A common stock as set forth in the table below.
Date
February 2015 .................................................................................................. $
January 2016 .................................................................................................... $
April 2016 ........................................................................................................ $
November 2016 ................................................................................................ $
October 2017 .................................................................................................... $
April 2018 ........................................................................................................ $
October 2018 .................................................................................................... $
Repurchase
Authorization
Expiration
150,000 December 31, 2016
200,000 December 31, 2017
113,182 December 31, 2017
236,000 December 31, 2018
200,000 December 31, 2019
300,000 December 31, 2020
300,000 December 31, 2020
The Company expects that the share repurchase program will primarily be used to offset a portion of the
shares that have been or will be issued under the Lazard Ltd 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2008 Plan”)
and the Lazard Ltd 2018 Incentive Compensation Plan (the “2018 Plan”). Pursuant to the share repurchase program,
purchases have been made in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. The rate at which the
Company purchases shares in connection with the share repurchase program may vary from period to period due to
a variety of factors. Purchases with respect to such program are set forth in the table below:
Years Ended December 31:
2016.....................................................................................................................
2017.....................................................................................................................
2018.....................................................................................................................
Number of
Shares
Purchased
Average
Price Per
Share
8,551,271 $
6,956,097 $
12,206,652 $
35.11
44.10
45.29
There were 17,574,805 and 10,747,142 shares of Class A common stock held by our subsidiaries at
December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Such shares of Class A common stock are reported, at cost, as “Class A
common stock held by subsidiaries” on the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition.
During 2018, 2017 and 2016, certain of our executive officers received Class A common stock in connection
with the vesting or settlement of previously-granted deferred equity incentive awards. The vesting or settlement of
such equity awards gave rise to a tax payable by the executive officers, and, consistent with our past practice, the
Company purchased shares of Class A common stock from the executive officers equal in value to all or a portion of
the estimated amount of such tax. In addition, during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, the
Company purchased shares of Class A common stock from certain of our executive officers. The aggregate value of
all such purchases in 2018, 2017 and 2016 was approximately $17,700, $14,700 and $4,900, respectively.
As of December 31, 2018, a total of $295,512 of share repurchase authorization remained available under the
Company’s share repurchase program, all of which will expire on December 31, 2020.
In addition, on February 4, 2019, the Board of Directors of Lazard authorized the repurchase of up to
$300,000 of additional shares of Class A common stock, which authorization will expire on December 31, 2020,
bringing the total available share repurchase authorization as of February 4, 2019 to approximately $510,000.
During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company had in place trading plans under Rule 10b5-1 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), pursuant to which it effected stock repurchases
in the open market.
107
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
Preferred Stock—Lazard Ltd has 15,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share,
inclusive of its Series A and Series B preferred stock. Series A and Series B preferred shares were issued in
connection with certain prior year business acquisitions and were each non-participating securities convertible into
Class A common stock, and had no voting or dividend rights. As of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, no shares
of Series A or Series B preferred stock were outstanding.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), Net of Tax—The tables below reflect the balances of
each component of AOCI at December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 and activity during the years then ended:
Balance, January 1, 2018 ......................................... $ (83,535) $(148,984) $(232,519) $
Activity:
(1) $(232,518)
Currency
Translation
Adjustments
Employee
Benefit
Plans
Total
AOCI
Amount
Attributable to
Noncontrolling
Interests
Total
Lazard Ltd
AOCI
Other comprehensive loss before
reclassifications................................................
Adjustments for items reclassified to earnings,
net of tax ..........................................................
Net other comprehensive income (loss) .............
10,735
(41,301)
Balance, December 31, 2018.................................... $ (130,137) $(143,683) $(273,820) $
-
(46,602)
10,735
5,301
(46,602)
(5,434)
(52,036)
(1)
(52,035)
10,735
-
(41,300)
(1)
(2) $(273,818)
Balance, January 1, 2017 ......................................... $ (155,204) $(159,020) $(314,224) $
Activity:
(2) $(314,222)
Currency
Translation
Adjustments
Employee
Benefit
Plans
Total
AOCI
Amount
Attributable to
Noncontrolling
Interests
Total
Lazard Ltd
AOCI
Other comprehensive income before
reclassifications................................................
Adjustments for items reclassified to earnings,
net of tax ..........................................................
Net other comprehensive income .......................
7,951
81,705
Balance, December 31, 2017.................................... $ (83,535) $(148,984) $(232,519) $
-
71,669
7,951
10,036
71,669
2,085
73,754
1
73,753
7,951
-
81,704
1
(1) $(232,518)
Currency
Translation
Adjustments
Employee
Benefit
Plans
Total
AOCI
Amount
Attributable to
Noncontrolling
Interests
Total
Lazard Ltd
AOCI
Balance, January 1, 2016 ......................................... $ (97,284) $(137,073) $(234,357) $
Activity:
Other comprehensive loss before
reclassifications.....................................................
Adjustments for items reclassified to earnings,
2,526
net of tax ...............................................................
(79,867)
Net other comprehensive loss ..................................
Balance, December 31, 2016 ................................... $ (155,204) $(159,020) $(314,224) $
-
(57,920)
2,526
(21,947)
(57,920)
(24,473)
(82,393)
(1) $(234,356)
(1)
(82,392)
2,526
-
(79,866)
(1)
(2) $(314,222)
108
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
The table below reflects adjustments for items reclassified out of AOCI, by component, for the years ended
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016:
Amortization relating to employee benefit plans (a)......................... $
Less - related income taxes ...............................................................
Total reclassifications, net of tax ...................................................... $
13,070 $
2,335
10,735 $
10,171
$
2,220
$
7,951
4,283
1,757
2,526
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2018
(a)
Included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost (see Note 16). Such amounts are included in
“operating expenses –other” on the consolidated statements of operations.
Noncontrolling Interests—Noncontrolling interests principally represent interests held in Edgewater’s
management vehicles that the Company is deemed to control, but does not own.
The tables below summarize net income attributable to noncontrolling interests for the years ended
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 and noncontrolling interests as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, in the
Company’s consolidated financial statements:
Net Income
Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2018
Edgewater.......................................................................................... $
Other..................................................................................................
Total .................................................................................................. $
5,320 $
4
5,324 $
6,259 $
5
6,264 $
5,992
2
5,994
Noncontrolling Interests
as of December 31,
2018
2017
Edgewater............................................................................................................ $
Other....................................................................................................................
Total .................................................................................................................... $
52,695 $
547
53,242 $
58,568
534
59,102
Dividends Declared, February 4, 2019—On February 4, 2019, the Board of Directors of Lazard declared
dividends totaling $0.94 per share, comprised of a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share, and an extra cash dividend
of $0.50 per share, on our Class A common stock. The dividends are payable on March 1, 2019, to stockholders of
record on February 15, 2019.
15.
INCENTIVE PLANS
Share-Based Incentive Plan Awards
A description of Lazard Ltd’s 2018 Plan, 2008 Plan and 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2005 Plan”) and
activity with respect thereto during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 is presented below.
Shares Available Under the 2018 Plan, 2008 Plan and 2005 Plan
The 2018 Plan became effective on April 24, 2018 and replaced the 2008 Plan, which was terminated on
April 24, 2018. The 2018 Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 30,000,000 shares of Class A common stock pursuant
to the grant or exercise of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units (“RSUs”), performance-
based restricted stock units (“PRSUs”) and other share-based awards.
109
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
The 2008 Plan authorized the issuance of shares of Class A common stock pursuant to the grant or exercise of
stock options, stock appreciation rights, RSUs, PRSUs and other share-based awards. Under the 2008 Plan, the
maximum number of shares available was based on a formula that limited the aggregate number of shares that could,
at any time, be subject to awards that were considered “outstanding” under the 2008 Plan to 30% of the then-
outstanding shares of Class A common stock. The 2008 Plan was terminated on April 24, 2018, and no additional
awards have been or will be granted under the 2008 Plan after its termination, although outstanding awards granted
under the 2008 Plan before its termination continue to be subject to its terms.
The 2005 Plan authorized the issuance of up to 25,000,000 shares of Class A common stock pursuant to the
grant or exercise of stock options, stock appreciation rights, RSUs and other share-based awards. The 2005 Plan
expired in the second quarter of 2015, although outstanding deferred stock unit (“DSU”) awards granted under the
2005 Plan before its expiration continue to be subject to its terms.
The following reflects the amortization expense recorded with respect to share-based incentive plans within
“compensation and benefits” expense (with respect to RSUs, PRSUs and restricted stock awards) and “professional
services” expense (with respect to DSUs) within the Company’s accompanying consolidated statements of
operations:
Share-based incentive awards:
RSUs............................................................................................ $
PRSUs..........................................................................................
Restricted Stock...........................................................................
DSUs............................................................................................
Total............................................................................................. $
193,924 $
34,114
37,261
2,274
267,573 $
190,821
40,767
39,369
2,008
272,965
$
$
171,188
43,018
45,536
1,720
261,462
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2018
The ultimate amount of compensation and benefits expense relating to share-based awards is dependent upon
the actual number of shares of Class A common stock that vest. The Company periodically assesses the forfeiture
rates used for such estimates, including as a result of any applicable performance conditions. A change in estimated
forfeiture rates or performance results in a cumulative adjustment to compensation and benefits expense and also
would cause the aggregate amount of compensation expense recognized in future periods to differ from the
estimated unrecognized compensation expense described below.
For purposes of calculating diluted net income per share, RSUs, DSUs and restricted stock awards are
included in the diluted weighted average shares of Class A common stock outstanding using the “treasury stock”
method. PRSUs are included in the diluted weighted average shares of Class A common stock outstanding to the
extent the performance conditions are met at the end of the reporting period, also using the “treasury stock” method.
The Company’s share-based incentive plans and awards are described below.
RSUs and DSUs
RSUs generally require future service as a condition for the delivery of the underlying shares of Class A
common stock (unless the recipient is then eligible for retirement under the Company’s retirement policy) and
convert into shares of Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis after the stipulated vesting periods. PRSUs,
which are RSUs that are also subject to service-based vesting conditions, have additional performance conditions,
and are described below. The grant date fair value of the RSUs, net of an estimated forfeiture rate, is amortized over
the vesting periods or requisite service periods (generally one-third after two years, and the remaining two-thirds
after the third year), and is adjusted for actual forfeitures over such period.
RSUs generally include a dividend participation right that provides that during vesting periods each RSU is
attributed additional RSUs (or fractions thereof) equivalent to any dividends paid on Class A common stock during
110
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
such period. During the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, issuances of RSUs pertaining to such
dividend participation rights and respective charges to “retained earnings”, net of estimated forfeitures (with
corresponding credits to “additional paid-in-capital”), consisted of the following:
Number of RSUs issued ....................................................................
Charges to retained earnings, net of estimated forfeitures................ $
Year Ended December 31,
2017
985,584
41,746
2018
888,472
44,255 $
$
2016
1,085,354
37,284
Non-executive members of the Board of Directors (“Non-Executive Directors”) receive approximately 55% of
their annual compensation for service on the Board of Directors and its committees in the form of DSUs, which
resulted in 30,463, 31,280 and 38,771 DSUs granted during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016,
respectively. Their remaining compensation is payable in cash, which they may elect to receive in the form of
additional DSUs under the Directors’ Fee Deferral Unit Plan described below. DSUs are convertible into shares of
Class A common stock at the time of cessation of service to the Board of Directors and, for purposes of calculating
diluted net income per share, are included in the diluted weighted average shares of Class A common stock
outstanding using the “treasury stock” method. DSUs include a cash dividend participation right equivalent to
dividends paid on Class A common stock.
The Company’s Directors’ Fee Deferral Unit Plan permits the Non-Executive Directors to elect to receive
additional DSUs in lieu of some or all of their cash fees. The number of DSUs granted to a Non-Executive Director
pursuant to this election will equal the value of cash fees that the applicable Non-Executive Director has elected to
forego pursuant to such election, divided by the market value of a share of Class A common stock on the date
immediately preceding the date of the grant. During the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, 14,661,
13,882 and 10,043 DSUs, respectively, had been granted pursuant to such Plan.
DSU awards are expensed at their fair value on their date of grant, inclusive of amounts related to the
Directors’ Fee Deferral Unit Plan.
The following is a summary of activity relating to RSUs and DSUs during the three-year period ended
December 31, 2018:
RSUs
DSUs
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Units
Units
44.06 312,670 $
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
35.98
Balance, January 1, 2016............................................ 9,599,658 $
Granted (including 1,085,354 RSUs relating to
dividend participation) ............................................ 6,878,306 $
Forfeited .....................................................................
(239,432) $
Settled......................................................................... (4,540,394) $
Balance, December 31, 2016...................................... 11,698,138 $
Granted (including 985,584 RSUs relating to
dividend participation) ............................................ 5,437,591 $
(217,720) $
Forfeited .....................................................................
Settled......................................................................... (3,998,163) $
Balance, December 31, 2017...................................... 12,919,846 $
Granted (including 888,472 RSUs relating to
dividend participation) ............................................ 4,245,554 $
Forfeited .....................................................................
(144,655) $
Settled......................................................................... (5,658,439) $
Balance, December 31, 2018...................................... 11,362,306 $
111
34.86
48,814 $
39.53
-
(84,759) $
39.16
40.65 276,725 $
45,162 $
43.03
-
40.20
45.26
(43,465) $
40.23 278,422 $
45,124 $
53.44
-
44.98
42.89
- $
43.78 323,546 $
35.23
-
35.30
36.05
44.46
-
35.77
37.46
50.40
-
-
39.27
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
In connection with RSUs that settled during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, the
Company satisfied its minimum statutory tax withholding requirements in lieu of delivering 1,651,129, 1,290,601
and 1,421,396 shares of Class A common stock during such respective years. Accordingly, 4,007,310, 2,707,562
and 3,118,998 shares of Class A common stock held by the Company were delivered during the years ended
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
As of December 31, 2018, estimated unrecognized RSU compensation expense was approximately $129,837,
with such expense expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 0.8 years subsequent
to December 31, 2018.
Restricted Stock
The following is a summary of activity related to shares of restricted Class A common stock associated with
compensation arrangements during the three-year period ended December 31, 2018:
Restricted
Shares
Balance, January 1, 2016 ...........................................................
713,738 $
Granted....................................................................................... 1,795,258 $
(34,051) $
Forfeited.....................................................................................
(819,872) $
Settled ........................................................................................
Balance, December 31, 2016 ..................................................... 1,655,073 $
841,355 $
Granted.......................................................................................
(66,592) $
Forfeited.....................................................................................
(491,676) $
Settled ........................................................................................
Balance, December 31, 2017 ..................................................... 1,938,160 $
529,987 $
Granted.......................................................................................
(35,968) $
Forfeited.....................................................................................
(891,121) $
Settled ........................................................................................
Balance, December 31, 2018 ..................................................... 1,541,058 $
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
47.12
36.76
40.48
37.16
40.95
42.58
40.80
45.35
40.54
54.45
45.99
44.06
43.16
In connection with shares of restricted Class A common stock that settled during the years ended
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, the Company satisfied its minimum statutory tax withholding requirements in
lieu of delivering 300,272, 150,470 and 141,026 shares of Class A common stock during such respective years.
Accordingly, 590,849, 341,206 and 678,846 shares of Class A common stock held by the Company were delivered
during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
The restricted stock awards include a cash dividend participation right equivalent to dividends paid on Class A
common stock during the period, which will vest concurrently with the underlying restricted stock award. At
December 31, 2018, estimated unrecognized restricted stock expense was approximately $17,849, with such expense
to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 0.7 years subsequent to December 31, 2018.
PRSUs
PRSUs are RSUs that are subject to both performance-based and service-based vesting conditions. The
number of shares of Class A common stock that a recipient will receive upon vesting of a PRSU will be calculated
by reference to certain performance metrics that relate to the Company’s performance over a three-year period. The
target number of shares of Class A common stock subject to each PRSU is one; however, based on the achievement
of the performance criteria, the number of shares of Class A common stock that may be received in connection with
each PRSU generally can range from zero to two times the target number. PRSUs will vest on a single date
112
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
approximately three years following the date of the grant, provided the applicable service and performance
conditions are satisfied. In addition, the performance metrics applicable to each PRSU will be evaluated on an
annual basis at the end of each fiscal year during the performance period and, if the Company has achieved a
threshold level of performance with respect to the fiscal year, 25% of the target number of shares of Class A
common stock subject to each PRSU will no longer be at risk of forfeiture based on the achievement of performance
criteria. PRSUs include dividend participation rights that provide that during vesting periods the target number of
PRSUs (or, following the relevant performance period, the actual number of shares of Class A common stock that
are no longer subject to performance conditions) receive dividend equivalents at the same rate that dividends are
paid on Class A common stock during such periods. These dividend equivalents are credited as RSUs that are not
subject to the performance-based vesting criteria but are otherwise subject to the same restrictions as the underlying
PRSUs to which they relate.
The following is a summary of activity relating to PRSUs during the three-year period ended December 31,
2018:
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
PRSUs
Balance, January 1, 2016 ........................................................... 1,019,038 $
627,956 $
Granted (a) .................................................................................
360,783 $
Performance units earned (b) .....................................................
Settled ........................................................................................
(417,021) $
Balance, December 31, 2016 ..................................................... 1,590,756 $
458,113 $
Granted (a) .................................................................................
368,389 $
Performance units earned (b) .....................................................
Settled ........................................................................................
(825,565) $
Balance, December 31, 2017 ..................................................... 1,591,693 $
399,869 $
Granted (a) .................................................................................
627,956 $
Performance units earned (b) .....................................................
Settled ........................................................................................
(847,723) $
Balance, December 31, 2018 ..................................................... 1,771,795 $
44.49
32.91
41.20
38.43
40.76
43.76
47.74
42.27
42.46
56.80
27.56
46.13
38.66
Represents PRSU awards granted during the relevant year at the target payout level.
(a)
(b) Represents shares of Class A common stock earned during the fiscal year under the performance criteria of
previously-granted PRSU awards in excess of the target payout level of such awards.
In connection with certain PRSUs that settled during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, the
Company satisfied its minimum statutory tax withholding requirements in lieu of delivering 91,962, 127,530 and
64,169 shares of Class A common stock during such respective years. Accordingly, 755,761, 698,035 and 352,852
shares of Class A common stock held by the Company were delivered during the years ended December 31, 2018,
2017 and 2016, respectively.
Compensation expense recognized for PRSU awards is determined by multiplying the number of shares of
Class A common stock underlying such awards that, based on the Company’s estimate, are considered probable of
vesting, by the grant date fair value. As of December 31, 2018, the total estimated unrecognized compensation
expense was approximately $6,498, and the Company expects to amortize such expense over a weighted-average
period of approximately 0.9 years subsequent to December 31, 2018.
LFI and Other Similar Deferred Compensation Arrangements
Commencing in February 2011, the Company granted LFI to eligible employees. In connection with LFI and
other similar deferred compensation arrangements, which generally require future service as a condition for vesting,
113
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
the Company recorded a prepaid compensation asset and a corresponding compensation liability on the grant date
based upon the fair value of the award. The prepaid asset is amortized on a straight-line basis over the applicable
vesting periods or requisite service periods (which are generally similar to the comparable periods for RSUs), and is
charged to “compensation and benefits” expense within the Company’s consolidated statement of operations. LFI
and similar deferred compensation arrangements that do not require future service are expensed immediately. The
related compensation liability is accounted for at fair value as a derivative liability, which contemplates the impact
of estimated forfeitures, and is adjusted for changes in fair value primarily related to changes in value of the
underlying investments.
The following is a summary of activity relating to LFI and other similar deferred compensation arrangements
during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017:
Prepaid
Compensation
Asset
Compensation
Liability
Balance, January 1, 2018........................................................................ $
Granted..............................................................................................
Settled ...............................................................................................
Forfeited............................................................................................
Amortization .....................................................................................
Change in fair value related to:
Decrease in fair value of underlying
investments...............................................................................
Adjustment for estimated forfeitures...........................................
Other .................................................................................................
Balance, December 31, 2018.................................................................. $
60,355 $
104,740
-
(1,391)
(85,679)
-
-
(1,663)
76,362 $
182,301
104,740
(86,318)
(2,682)
-
(14,086)
5,842
(1,775)
188,022
Prepaid
Compensation
Asset
Compensation
Liability
Balance, January 1, 2017........................................................................ $
Granted..............................................................................................
Settled ...............................................................................................
Forfeited............................................................................................
Amortization .....................................................................................
Change in fair value related to:
Increase in fair value of underlying
investments...............................................................................
Adjustment for estimated forfeitures...........................................
Other .................................................................................................
Balance, December 31, 2017.................................................................. $
49,650 $
77,580
-
(992)
(67,575)
-
-
1,692
60,355 $
170,388
77,580
(96,025)
(1,819)
-
23,526
6,634
2,017
182,301
The amortization of the prepaid compensation asset will generally be recognized over a weighted average
period of approximately 0.9 years subsequent to December 31, 2018.
114
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
The following is a summary of the impact of LFI and other similar deferred compensation arrangements on
“compensation and benefits” expense within the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the years
ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016:
Year Ended Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2018
Amortization, net of forfeitures.............................................. $
Change in the fair value of underlying investments...............
Total ....................................................................................... $
90,230 $
(14,086)
76,144 $
73,382
$
23,526
$
96,908
75,573
3,318
78,891
Incentive Awards Granted In February 2019
On February 4, 2019, the Company, including Lazard Group, amended and restated the Operating Agreement
of Lazard Group in order to establish a new long-term incentive compensation program consisting of profits interest
participation rights (“PIPRs”), which are equity incentive awards that, subject to certain conditions, may be
exchanged for shares of the Company’s Class A common stock pursuant to the 2018 Plan.
In February 2019, the Company granted approximately $378,000 of deferred incentive compensation awards
to eligible employees. These grants included: RSUs or shares of restricted Class A common stock; PIPRs, including
PIPRs that are subject to additional performance conditions; LFI awards; deferred cash awards; and a portion of
certain fund managers’ year-end incentive compensation that is reinvested in certain funds managed by the
Company’s Asset Management business.
The RSUs, restricted Class A common stock and LFI granted generally provide for one-third vesting on the
second anniversary of the grant date and the remaining two-thirds vesting on the third anniversary of the grant date,
so long as applicable conditions have been satisfied. The PIPRs granted generally provide for vesting on the third
anniversary of the grant date, so long as applicable conditions have been satisfied. Compensation expense with
respect to such incentive awards will generally be recognized over the applicable service period.
16. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The Company provides retirement and other post-retirement benefits to certain of its employees through
defined benefit pension plans (the “pension plans”) and, until December 2016, in the U.S., a partially funded
contributory medical post-retirement plan covering certain qualifying U.S. employees. The Company also offers
defined contribution plans to its employees. The pension plans generally provide benefits to participants based on
average levels of compensation. Expenses related to the Company’s employee benefit plans are included in
“compensation and benefits” expense for the service cost component, and “operating expenses-other” for the other
components of benefit costs on the consolidated statements of operations (See Note 3).
Medical Plan—The medical plan was previously amended such that effective January 1, 2005 the plan limited
post-retirement medical coverage to then former and current employees of the Company that were hired prior to
January 1, 2005 and attained the age of 55 on or prior to December 31, 2005, and their dependents. Effective
December 31, 2016, the Company ceased offering the medical plan.
In October 2016, the Company paid participants in the medical plan $2,936 in the aggregate to settle in full the
Company’s obligations under the medical plan. The settlement of such obligations resulted in the recognition of a
gain of $1,788 that is recorded as a reduction to compensation and benefits expense in the consolidated statements of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2016.
115
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
Employer Contributions to Pension Plans—The Company’s funding policy for its U.S. and non-U.S. pension
plans is to fund when required or when applicable upon an agreement with the plans’ trustees. Management also
evaluates from time to time whether to make voluntary contributions to the plans.
The Company does not expect to make a contribution to the U.S. pension plan during the year ending
December 31, 2019. The Company expects to contribute approximately $4,000 to the other non-U.S. pension plans
during the year ending December 31, 2019.
The following table summarizes the changes in the benefit obligations, the fair value of the assets, the funded
status and amounts recognized in the consolidated statements of financial condition for the post-retirement plans.
The Company uses December 31 as the measurement date for its post-retirement plans.
Change in benefit obligation
Benefit obligation at beginning of year............................................................... $
Service cost .........................................................................................................
Interest cost .........................................................................................................
Amendments .......................................................................................................
Actuarial (gain) loss ............................................................................................
Benefits paid .......................................................................................................
Foreign currency translation and other adjustments ...........................................
Benefit obligation at end of year.........................................................................
Change in plan assets
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year .....................................................
Actual return on plan assets ................................................................................
Employer contributions.......................................................................................
Benefits paid .......................................................................................................
Foreign currency translation and other adjustments ...........................................
Fair value of plan assets at end of year ...............................................................
Funded (deficit) at end of year ............................................................................ $
Amounts recognized in the consolidated statements
of financial condition at December 31, 2018 and
2017 consist of:
Prepaid pension asset (included in “other assets”) ....................................... $
Accrued benefit liability (included in “other
liabilities”) ..................................................................................................
Net amount recognized ....................................................................................... $
Amounts recognized in AOCI (excluding tax
benefits of $33,231 and $35,154 at December 31,
2018 and 2017, respectively) consist of:
Actuarial net loss (gain)................................................................................. $
Prior service cost (credit)...............................................................................
Net amount recognized ....................................................................................... $
Pension Plans
2018
2017
763,831 $
884
15,569
3,196
(27,623)
(64,747)
(36,095)
655,015
728,281
(10,608)
22,153
(62,056)
(34,933)
642,837
(12,178) $
718,821
1,413
16,240
-
2,702
(44,589)
69,244
763,831
646,119
43,624
16,844
(42,022)
63,716
728,281
(35,550)
19,573 $
16,189
(31,751)
(12,178) $
(51,739)
(35,550)
173,732 $
3,178
176,910 $
184,135
-
184,135
116
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
The following table summarizes the fair value of plan assets, the accumulated benefit obligation and the
projected benefit obligation at December 31, 2018 and 2017:
U.S. Pension Plans
As Of December 31,
2017
2018
Non-U.S. Pension Plans
As Of December 31,
2017
2018
As Of December 31,
2017
2018
Total
Fair value of plan assets .................................... $ 20,813 $ 24,644 $622,024 $703,637 $642,837 $728,281
Accumulated benefit obligation ........................ $ 28,869 $ 35,376 $626,146 $728,455 $655,015 $763,831
Projected benefit obligation .............................. $ 28,869 $ 35,376 $626,146 $728,455 $655,015 $763,831
The following table summarizes the components of net periodic benefit cost (credit), the return on the
Company’s post-retirement plan assets, benefits paid, contributions and other amounts recognized in AOCI for the
years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016:
Pension Plans
For The Year Ended
December 31,
2017
2018
2016
2018
Medical Plan
For The Year Ended
December 31,
2017
2016
Components of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
(Credit):
Service cost.................................................. $
884
Interest cost.................................................. 15,569
Expected return on plan assets..................... (29,622) (25,300) (27,337)
Amortization of:
$
1,235
19,871
$ 1,413
16,240
$
Prior service cost ....................................
18
Net actuarial loss (gain) ......................... 11,840
1,212
Settlement loss (gain) ..................................
Net periodic benefit cost (credit)....................... $
30
10,141
807
(99) $ 3,331
Actual return on plan assets .............................. $ (10,608) $ 43,624
$ 16,844
Employer contributions..................................... $ 22,153
Benefits paid ..................................................... $ 62,056
$ 42,022
Other changes in plan assets and benefit
obligations recognized in AOCI (excluding
tax expense (benefit) of $1,923, $(1,287)
and $(3,448) during the years ended
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016,
respectively):
2,369
3,888
-
26
$
$119,287
$ 11,343
$ 29,384
$ (17,357) $ 51,626
-
-
Net actuarial (gain) loss ......................... $ 11,073
3,196
Prior service cost (credit) .......................
Reclassification of prior service (cost)
credit to earnings .................................
Reclassification of actuarial gain (loss)
to earnings ........................................... (13,052) (10,141)
Currency translation and other
adjustments..........................................
(8,424) 18,778
(18)
(30)
(2,369)
(3,888)
(20,309)
$
Total recognized in AOCI................................. $ (7,225) $ (8,750) $ 25,060
Net amount recognized in total periodic
benefit cost and AOCI.................................... $ (7,324) $ (5,419) $ 25,086
$
$
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
11
167
-
-
(185)
(1,788)
$ (1,795)
-
-
$
$
-
-
$ 3,289
$ 3,289
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
$ (1,638)
-
-
1,973
-
335
$
$
-
$
-
$ (1,460)
117
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
The amounts in AOCI on the consolidated statement of financial condition as of December 31, 2018 that are
expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost (credit) for the year ending December 31, 2019
are as follows:
Pension
Plans
Net actuarial loss.......................................................................................................................... $
Prior service cost.......................................................................................................................... $
5,031
110
The assumptions used to develop actuarial present value of the projected benefit obligation and net periodic
pension cost as of or for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 are set forth below:
Pension Plans
December 31,
2017
2018
2016
2018
Medical Plan
December 31,
2017
2016
Weighted average assumptions used to
determine benefit obligations:
Discount rate................................................
2.6%
2.3%
2.5%
-
-
-
Weighted average assumptions used to
determine net periodic benefit cost:
Discount rate................................................
Expected long-term rate of return on plan
assets.........................................................
Healthcare cost trend rates used to determine
net periodic benefit cost:
2.4%
2.2%
1.9%
4.4%
3.8%
4.6%
Initial............................................................
Ultimate .......................................................
Year ultimate trend rate achieved ................
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3.9%
-
6.5%
5.0%
2019
Generally, the Company determined the discount rates for its defined benefit plans by utilizing indices for
long-term, high-quality bonds and ensuring that the discount rate does not exceed the yield reported for those indices
after adjustment for the duration of the plans’ liabilities.
In selecting the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets, the Company considered the average rate of
earnings expected on the funds invested or to be invested to provide for the benefits of the plan, giving consideration
to expected returns on different asset classes held by the plans in light of prevailing economic conditions as well as
historical returns. This basis is consistent for all years presented.
Expected Benefit Payments—The following table summarizes the expected benefit payments for the
Company’s pension plans for each of the next five fiscal years and in the aggregate for the five fiscal years
thereafter:
2019................................................................................................................ $
2020................................................................................................................
2021................................................................................................................
2022................................................................................................................
2023................................................................................................................
2024-2028 ......................................................................................................
Pension
Plans
24,782
24,570
27,051
28,053
28,787
152,854
118
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
Plan Assets—The following tables present the categorization of our pension plans’ assets as of December 31,
2018 and 2017, measured at fair value, into a fair value hierarchy and investments measured at NAV or its
equivalent as a practical expedient in accordance with fair value measurement disclosure requirements:
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 NAV (a)
Total
As of December 31, 2018
Assets:
Cash ............................................................. $
6,619 $
Debt ............................................................. 81,533
Equities ........................................................ 27,585
Funds:
Alternative investments..........................
-
Debt ........................................................ 10,593
Equity ..................................................... 151,199
-
Derivative ....................................................
Total............................................................. $277,529 $
- $
-
-
- $
-
-
- $
6,619
- 81,533
- 27,585
-
-
5,572
991
6,563 $
- 29,975 29,975
- 322,739 333,332
6,031 162,802
-
991
-
-
- $358,745 $642,837
Assets:
Level 1
As of December 31, 2017
Level 3
NAV (a)
Level 2
Cash ............................................................. $ 11,544 $
Debt ............................................................. 73,728
Equities ........................................................ 36,854
Funds:
Alternative investments..........................
-
Debt ........................................................ 11,002
Equity ..................................................... 192,875
Derivative ....................................................
-
Total............................................................. $326,003 $
- $
-
-
- $
-
-
Total
- $ 11,544
- 73,728
- 36,854
-
-
3,746
664
4,410 $
- 25,938 25,938
- 363,915 374,917
8,015 204,636
-
-
664
-
- $397,868 $728,281
(a)
Represents certain investments measured at NAV or its equivalent as a practical expedient in determining fair
value. In accordance with current accounting guidance, these investments have not been classified in the fair
value hierarchy.
Included in equity funds are $87,129 and $102,455 as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, that are
invested in funds managed by the Company.
Consistent with the plans’ investment strategies, at December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company’s U.S. pension
plan had 49% and 55%, respectively, of the plans’ assets invested in equity funds in Level 1 and measured at NAV
or its equivalent as a practical expedient and 51% and 45%, respectively, invested in Level 1 debt funds. The
Company’s non-U.S. pension plans at December 31, 2018 and 2017 had 29% and 32%, respectively, of the plans’
assets invested in equities and equity funds that are primarily Level 1 assets; 65% and 62%, respectively, of the
plans’ assets invested in debt and debt funds that are Level 1 assets or measured at NAV or its equivalent as a
practical expedient, and 6% and 6%, respectively, of the plans’ assets invested in cash, which is a Level 1 asset, or
in alternative investment funds that are primarily measured at NAV.
119
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
Investment Policies and Strategies—The primary investment goal is to ensure that the pension plans remain
well funded, taking account of the likely future risks to investment returns and contributions. As a result, a portfolio
of assets is maintained with appropriate liquidity and diversification that can be expected to generate long-term
future returns that minimize the long-term costs of the pension plans without exposing the plans to an unacceptable
risk of under-funding. The Company’s likely future ability to pay such contributions as are required to maintain the
funded status of the plans over a reasonable time period is considered when determining the level of risk that is
appropriate. The fair value of plan investments classified as Level 1 assets are based on market quotes. The fair
value of plan investments measured at NAV or its equivalent as a practical expedient is determined based on
information provided by external fund administrators and such investments are redeemable in the near term.
Defined Contribution Plans—Pursuant to certain matching contributions, the Company contributes to
employer sponsored defined contribution plans. Such contributions amounted to $15,872, $15,065 and $14,454 for
the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, which are included in “compensation and
benefits” expense on the consolidated statements of operations.
17.
INCOME TAXES
Lazard Ltd, through its subsidiaries, is subject to U.S. federal income taxes on all of its U.S. operating income,
as well as on the portion of non-U.S. income attributable to its U.S. subsidiaries. In addition, Lazard Ltd, through its
subsidiaries, is subject to state and local taxes on its income apportioned to various state and local jurisdictions.
Outside the U.S., Lazard Group operates principally through subsidiary corporations that are subject to local income
taxes in foreign jurisdictions. Lazard Group is also subject to Unincorporated Business Tax (“UBT”) attributable to
its operations apportioned to New York City.
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) was enacted. The Tax Act significantly
revised the U.S. corporate income tax system by, among other changes, lowering the corporate income tax rate from
35% to 21%, implementing a partial territorial tax system and imposing a one-time repatriation tax on the deemed
repatriated earnings of foreign subsidiaries. The Tax Act also included several provisions that limited the benefit of
the tax rate reduction, such as restricting the deductibility of interest expense and other corporate business expenses.
The Tax Act further included anti-base erosion provisions such as the base erosion and anti-abuse tax and tax on
global intangible low-taxed income.
As a result of the reduction of the U.S. federal corporate tax rate to 21%, the Company was required to
remeasure its deferred tax assets and liabilities at the new federal income tax rate of 21% based on the balances that
existed on the date of the enactment of the Tax Act. The lower corporate tax rate resulted in a reduction of our net
deferred tax assets by approximately $420,000 in the year ended December 31, 2017. See also Note 19 for the
impact of the Tax Act on the tax receivable agreement obligation.
The Tax Act also required companies to pay a one-time repatriation tax on previously unremitted earnings of
certain non-U.S. corporate subsidiaries. Most of the Company’s operations outside the U.S. are conducted in “pass-
through” entities for U.S. income tax purposes, and, as a result, the deemed repatriation transition tax did not apply
to these pass-through entities or their earnings. The Company instead provides for U.S. income taxes on a current
basis for those earnings. The Company also conducts operations outside the U.S. through foreign corporate
subsidiaries, and the Company recorded a provisional amount of deferred tax expense in the year ended
December 31, 2017 related to the one-time repatriation tax on the foreign earnings of those corporate subsidiaries.
In accordance with the guidance provided by Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, the Company recognized the
provisional tax impact related to the one-time deemed repatriation tax on certain foreign earnings and the
remeasurement of our deferred tax assets in the year ended December 31, 2017. In 2018, we finalized our analysis of
the provisional items, including the one-time repatriation tax, and adjustments to previously recorded provisional
amounts related to the Tax Act were not material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
120
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
On January 1, 2017, the Company adopted new accounting guidance on share-based incentive compensation.
As a result of the adoption of this new guidance, the Company recognized excess tax benefits of approximately
$33,000 and $9,000 from the vesting of share-based incentive compensation in the provision for income taxes in the
consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Company
also recorded deferred tax assets of $81,544, net of a valuation allowance of $12,090, as of January 1, 2017, for
previously unrecognized excess tax benefits (including tax benefits from dividends or dividend equivalents) on
share-based incentive compensation, with an offsetting adjustment to retained earnings.
The components of the Company’s provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017
and 2016, and a reconciliation of the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate to the Company’s effective tax rates for
such years, are shown below.
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2018
Current:
Federal.................................................................... $
Foreign ...................................................................
State and local ........................................................
2,507
95,279
5,145
Total current ................................................................ 102,931
Deferred:
$
$
349
64,119
(32)
64,436
1,766
54,253
4,090
60,109
49,604
Federal....................................................................
(12,632)
Foreign ...................................................................
8,414
State and local ........................................................
45,386
Total deferred ..............................................................
Total............................................................................. $ 148,317
480,085
12,928
8,150
501,163
$ 565,599
50,602
1,354
11,704
63,660
$ 123,769
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2018
U.S. federal statutory income tax rate.........................
U.S. tax reform............................................................
Foreign source income not subject to U.S.
income tax ................................................................
Change in U.S. federal valuation allowance ...............
Share-based incentive compensation ..........................
Foreign taxes ...............................................................
Foreign tax credits.......................................................
State and local taxes ....................................................
Income of non-controlling interests ............................
Other............................................................................
Effective income tax rate ............................................
21.0%
1.0
35.0%
43.4
(2.2)
2.1
(5.0)
5.7
(4.3)
2.0
(0.1)
1.6
21.8%
(4.2)
(3.4)
(4.0)
1.8
(2.0)
2.4
(0.3)
(0.2)
68.5%
35.0%
-
(9.3)
(3.6)
-
0.5
(0.6)
3.0
(0.3)
(0.8)
23.9%
See Note 21 regarding “operating income (loss)” by geographic region.
121
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
Deferred income taxes are provided for the effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of an asset
or liability and its reported amount in the consolidated statements of financial condition. These temporary
differences result in taxable or deductible amounts in future years. Details of the Company’s deferred tax assets and
liabilities are as follows:
Deferred Tax Assets:
Basis adjustments (a) ..................................................................................... $
Compensation and benefits............................................................................
Net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards ............................................
Depreciation and amortization.......................................................................
Other ..............................................................................................................
Gross deferred tax assets ...............................................................................
Valuation allowance ......................................................................................
Deferred tax assets (net of valuation allowance)...........................................
Deferred Tax Liabilities:
Depreciation and amortization.......................................................................
Compensation and benefits............................................................................
Goodwill ........................................................................................................
Other ..............................................................................................................
Deferred tax liabilities ...................................................................................
Net deferred tax assets ............................................................................. $
December 31,
2018
2017
288,764
159,799
249,509
1,764
35,801
735,637
(73,114)
662,523
14,550
9,816
26,124
19,828
70,318
592,205
$
$
339,133
175,456
239,959
1,537
34,615
790,700
(61,456)
729,244
17,257
23,251
21,749
26,134
88,391
640,853
(a)
The basis adjustments recorded as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 are primarily the result of additional basis
from acquisitions of interests, including the impact of the tax receivable agreement obligation.
The historical profitability of each tax paying entity is an important factor in determining whether to record a
valuation allowance and when to release any such allowance. Certain of our tax-paying entities have individually
experienced losses on a cumulative three year basis or have tax attributes that may expire unused. In addition, one of
our tax paying entities has recorded a valuation allowance on substantially all of its deferred tax assets due to the
combined effect of operating losses in certain subsidiaries of that entity as well as foreign taxes that together
substantially offset any U.S. tax liability. Taking into account all available information, we cannot determine that it
is more likely than not that deferred tax assets held by these entities will be realized. Consequently, we have
recorded valuation allowances on $73,114 and $61,456 of deferred tax assets held by these entities as of
December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Changes in the deferred tax assets valuation allowance for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016
was as follows:
Beginning Balance ................................................................. $
Charged (credited) to provision for income taxes ..................
Charged (credited) to other comprehensive income and
other (a) ...............................................................................
Ending Balance ...................................................................... $
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2018
$
61,456
14,156
69,593
$
(23,670)
89,251
(15,981)
(2,498)
$
73,114
15,533
61,456
$
(3,677)
69,593
(a)
In accordance with the accounting guidance described above, 2017 includes recognition of previously
unrecognized excess tax benefits offset by a valuation allowance of $12,090 recorded to retained earnings.
2016 includes acquisition-related deferred tax assets offset by a valuation allowance in the amount of $2,271.
122
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
The Company had net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards for which related deferred tax assets of
$249,509 were recorded at December 31, 2018 primarily relating to:
(i)
indefinite-lived carryforwards (subject to various limitations) of approximately $32,000 in Australia,
Germany, Hong Kong, Singapore, Spain, the U.K. and the U.S.; and
(ii)
certain carryforwards of approximately $171,000 in the U.S., which begin expiring in 2029.
With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to income tax examination by foreign tax authorities
and by U.S. federal, state and local tax authorities for years prior to 2014. While we are under examination in
various tax jurisdictions with respect to certain open years, the Company does not expect that the result of any final
determination related to these examinations will have a material impact on its financial statements. Developments
with respect to such examinations are monitored on an ongoing basis and adjustments to tax liabilities are made as
appropriate.
A reconciliation of the beginning to the ending amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits (excluding interest
and penalties) for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 is as follows:
Balance, January 1 (excluding interest and penalties
of $15,136, $15,392 and $13,083, respectively) ................. $
Increases in gross unrecognized tax benefits relating
to tax positions taken during:
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2018
78,674
$
78,396
$
77,280
Prior years .........................................................................
Current year ......................................................................
653
17,961
1,598
19,823
5,891
18,438
Decreases in gross unrecognized tax benefits
relating to:
Tax positions taken during prior years .............................
Settlements with tax authorities........................................
Lapse of the applicable statute of limitations ...................
(699)
(1,218)
(17,482)
(2,961)
-
(18,182)
(5,316)
(1,706)
(16,191)
Balance, December 31 (excluding interest and
penalties of $15,901, $15,136 and $15,392,
respectively) ........................................................................ $
77,889
$
78,674
$
78,396
Additional information with respect to unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
Unrecognized tax benefits at the end of the year that,
if recognized, would favorably affect the effective
tax rate (includes interest and penalties of $15,901,
$15,136 and $15,392, respectively) .................................... $
Unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would not
affect the effective tax rate .................................................. $
Interest and penalties recognized in current income
tax expense (after giving effect to the reversal of
interest and penalties of $4,889, $6,185 and
$3,143, respectively) ........................................................... $
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2018
78,693
$
78,841
$
81,564
15,097
$
14,969
$
12,224
765
$
(256) $
2,309
The Company anticipates that it is reasonably possible that approximately $13,000 of unrecognized tax
benefits, including interest and penalties recorded at December 31, 2018, may be recognized within 12 months as a
result of the lapse of the statute of limitations in various tax jurisdictions.
123
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
18. NET INCOME PER SHARE OF CLASS A COMMON STOCK
The Company’s basic and diluted net income per share calculations for the years ended December 31, 2018,
2017 and 2016 are computed as described below.
Basic Net Income Per Share
Numerator—utilizes net income attributable to Lazard Ltd for the respective years.
Denominator—utilizes the weighted average number of shares of Class A common stock outstanding for the
respective years, plus applicable adjustments to such shares associated with shares of Class A common stock
issuable on a non-contingent basis.
Diluted Net Income Per Share
Numerator—utilizes net income attributable to Lazard Ltd for the respective years as in the basic net income
per share calculation described above.
Denominator —utilizes the weighted average number of shares of Class A common stock outstanding for the
respective years as in the basic net income per share calculation described above, plus, to the extent dilutive, the
incremental number of shares of Class A common stock required to settle share-based incentive compensation.
The calculations of the Company’s basic and diluted net income per share and weighted average shares
outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 are presented below:
2018
527,125 $
Year Ended December 31,
2017
253,583 $
253,583 $
2016
387,698
Net income attributable to Lazard Ltd - basic................................... $
387,698
527,125 $
Net income attributable to Lazard Ltd - diluted................................ $
Weighted average number of shares of Class A common stock
outstanding ..................................................................................... 118,753,778 121,309,174 124,635,160
Add - adjustment for shares of Class A common stock issuable on
a non-contingent basis....................................................................
Weighted average number of shares of Class A common stock
outstanding - basic ......................................................................... 119,006,531 121,573,442 124,770,401
Add - dilutive effect, as applicable, of:
Weighted average number of incremental shares of Class A
common stock issuable from share-based incentive
compensation ................................................................................. 10,761,061 10,906,286
Weighted average number of shares of Class A common stock
outstanding - diluted....................................................................... 129,767,592 132,479,728 132,633,630
Net income attributable to Lazard Ltd per share of Class A
common stock:
264,268
252,753
7,863,229
135,241
Basic ............................................................................................ $
Diluted ......................................................................................... $
4.43 $
4.06 $
2.09 $
1.91 $
3.11
2.92
124
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
19. RELATED PARTIES
Sponsored Funds
The Company serves as an investment advisor for certain affiliated investment companies and fund entities
and receives management fees and, for the alternative investment funds, performance-based incentive fees for
providing such services. Investment advisory fees relating to such services were $654,561, $649,089 and $516,667
for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and are included in “asset management fees”
on the consolidated statements of operations. Of such amounts, $59,304 and $69,107 remained as receivables at
December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and are included in “fees receivable” on the consolidated statements of
financial condition.
Tax Receivable Agreement
The Second Amended and Restated Tax Receivable Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2015 (the “Amended
and Restated Tax Receivable Agreement”), between Lazard and LTBP Trust, a Delaware statutory trust (the
“Trust”), provides for the payment by our subsidiaries to the Trust of (i) approximately 45% of the amount of cash
savings, if any, in U.S. federal, state and local income tax or franchise tax that we actually realize as a result of
certain increases in tax basis and of certain other tax benefits related to the Amended and Restated Tax Receivable
Agreement, and (ii) an amount that we currently expect will approximate 85% of the cash tax savings that may arise
from tax benefits attributable to payments under the Amended and Restated Tax Receivable Agreement. Our
subsidiaries expect to benefit from the balance of cash savings, if any, in income tax that our subsidiaries realize.
Any amount paid by our subsidiaries to the Trust will generally be distributed to the owners of the Trust, who
include certain of our executive officers, in proportion to their beneficial interests in the Trust.
For purposes of the Amended and Restated Tax Receivable Agreement, cash savings in income and franchise
tax will be computed by comparing our subsidiaries’ actual income and franchise tax liability to the amount of such
taxes that our subsidiaries would have been required to pay had there been no increase in the tax basis of certain
tangible and intangible assets of Lazard Group attributable to our subsidiaries’ interest in Lazard Group and had our
subsidiaries not entered into the Amended and Restated Tax Receivable Agreement. The term of the Amended and
Restated Tax Receivable Agreement will continue until approximately 2033 or, if earlier, until all relevant tax
benefits have been utilized or expired.
The amount of the Amended and Restated Tax Receivable Agreement liability is an undiscounted amount
based upon currently enacted tax laws, including the Tax Act, the current structure of the Company and various
assumptions regarding potential future operating profitability. The assumptions reflected in the estimate involve
significant judgment. For example, if our structure were to change or our annual taxable income were to increase,
we could be required to accelerate payments under the Amended and Restated Tax Receivable Agreement. As such,
the actual amount and timing of payments under the Amended and Restated Tax Receivable Agreement could differ
materially from our estimates. Any changes in the amount of the estimated liability would be recorded as a non-
compensation expense in the consolidated statement of operations. Adjustments, if necessary, to the related deferred
tax assets would be recorded through the “provision (benefit) for income taxes”.
For the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded a “benefit pursuant to tax receivable
agreement” on the consolidated statements of operations of $6,495 and $202,546, respectively. As described in
Note 17, the Tax Act reduced the U.S. corporate tax rate from 35% to 21% which required the Company to
remeasure the tax receivable agreement obligation. Pursuant to the change in the U.S. corporate tax rate, in 2017, the
Company reduced the tax receivable agreement obligation by $202,546. The cumulative liability relating to our
obligations under the Amended and Restated Tax Receivable Agreement as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 was
$270,640 and $310,275, respectively, and is recorded in “tax receivable agreement obligation” on the consolidated
statements of financial condition. The balance at December 31, 2018 reflects a payment made under the Amended
and Restated Tax Receivable Agreement in the year ended December 31, 2018 of $33,140.
125
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
Other
In the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company established a not-for-profit entity, the Lazard Foundation (the
“Foundation”), with the objective of donating funds to qualifying charities. In November 2018, the Company made
an unconditional commitment of $10,000 to the Foundation. The Company agreed to fund the unconditional
commitment by December 31, 2028. Certain executive officers of the Company will serve as members, directors
and officers of the Foundation. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, the Foundation is not consolidated in the
accompanying financial statements.
See Note 14 for information regarding related party transactions pertaining to shares repurchased from certain
of our executive officers.
20. REGULATORY AUTHORITIES
LFNY is a U.S. registered broker-dealer and is subject to the net capital requirements of Rule 15c3-1 under
the Exchange Act. Under the basic method permitted by this rule, the minimum required net capital, as defined, is a
specified fixed percentage (6 2/3%) of total aggregate indebtedness recorded in LFNY’s Financial and Operational
Combined Uniform Single (“FOCUS”) report filed with the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), or
$100, whichever is greater. In addition, the ratio of aggregate indebtedness (as defined) to net capital may not
exceed 15:1. At December 31, 2018, LFNY’s regulatory net capital was $174,732, which exceeded the minimum
requirement by $171,679. LFNY’s aggregate indebtedness to net capital ratio was 0.26:1 as of December 31, 2018.
Certain U.K. subsidiaries of the Company, including LCL, Lazard Fund Managers Limited and Lazard Asset
Management Limited (collectively, the “U.K. Subsidiaries”) are regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. At
December 31, 2018, the aggregate regulatory net capital of the U.K. Subsidiaries was $162,350, which exceeded the
minimum requirement by $142,542.
CFLF, under which asset management and commercial banking activities are carried out in France, is subject
to regulation by the Autorité de Contrôle Prudentiel et de Résolution (“ACPR”) for its banking activities conducted
through its subsidiary, LFB. LFB, as a registered bank, is engaged primarily in commercial and private banking
services for clients and funds managed by LFG (asset management) and other clients, and asset-liability
management. The investment services activities of the Paris group, exercised through LFB and other subsidiaries of
CFLF, primarily LFG, also are subject to regulation and supervision by the Autorité des Marchés Financiers. At
December 31, 2018, the consolidated regulatory net capital of CFLF was $136,110, which exceeded the minimum
requirement set for regulatory capital levels by $81,336. In addition, pursuant to the consolidated supervision rules
in the European Union, LFB, in particular, as a French credit institution, is required to be supervised by a regulatory
body, either in the U.S. or in the European Union. During the third quarter of 2013, the Company and the ACPR
agreed on terms for the consolidated supervision of LFB and certain other non-Financial Advisory European
subsidiaries of the Company (referred to herein, on a combined basis, as the “combined European regulated group”)
under such rules. Under this supervision, the combined European regulated group is required to comply with
minimum requirements for regulatory net capital to be reported on a quarterly basis and satisfy periodic financial
and other reporting obligations. At December 31, 2018, the regulatory net capital of the combined European
regulated group was $157,783, which exceeded the minimum requirement set for regulatory capital levels by
$56,330. Additionally, the combined European regulated group, together with our European Financial Advisory
entities, is required to perform an annual risk assessment and provide certain other information on a periodic basis,
including financial reports and information relating to financial performance, balance sheet data and capital
structure.
Certain other U.S. and non-U.S. subsidiaries are subject to various capital adequacy requirements promulgated
by various regulatory and exchange authorities in the countries in which they operate. At December 31, 2018, for
those subsidiaries with regulatory capital requirements, their aggregate net capital was $149,252, which exceeded
the minimum required capital by $121,863.
126
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
At December 31, 2018, each of these subsidiaries individually was in compliance with its regulatory capital
requirements.
Any new or expanded rules and regulations that may be adopted in countries in which we operate (including
regulations that have not yet been proposed) could affect us in other ways.
21.
SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company’s reportable segments offer different products and services and are managed separately as
different levels and types of expertise are required to effectively manage the segments’ transactions. Each segment is
reviewed to determine the allocation of resources and to assess its performance. The Company’s principal operating
activities are included in its Financial Advisory and Asset Management business segments as described in Note 1. In
addition, as described in Note 1, the Company records selected other activities in its Corporate segment.
The Company’s segment information for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 is prepared
using the following methodology:
•
•
•
Revenue and expenses directly associated with each segment are included in determining operating
income.
Expenses not directly associated with specific segments are allocated based on the most relevant
measures applicable, including headcount, square footage and other factors.
Segment assets are based on those directly associated with each segment, and include an allocation of
certain assets relating to various segments, based on the most relevant measures applicable, including
headcount, square footage and other factors.
The Company allocates investment gains and losses, interest income and interest expense among the various
segments based on the segment in which the underlying asset or liability is reported.
Each segment’s operating expenses include (i) compensation and benefits expenses incurred directly in
support of the businesses and (ii) other operating expenses, which include directly incurred expenses for occupancy
and equipment, marketing and business development, technology and information services, professional services,
fund administration and outsourced services and indirect support costs (including compensation and other operating
expenses related thereto) for administrative services. Such administrative services include, but are not limited to,
accounting, tax, human resources, legal, facilities management and senior management activities.
For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, no individual client constituted more than 10% of the
net revenue of any of the Company’s business segments.
127
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
Management evaluates segment results based on net revenue and operating income (loss) and believes that the
following information provides a reasonable representation of each segment’s contribution with respect to net
revenue, operating income (loss) and total assets:
Financial Advisory............. Net Revenue
Operating Expenses (a)
Operating Income
Total Assets
Asset Management............. Net Revenue
Operating Expenses (a)
Operating Income
Total Assets
Corporate ........................... Net Revenue
Operating Expenses (a)/(b)
Operating Income (Loss)
Total Assets
Total .................................... Net Revenue
Operating Expenses (a)
Operating Income
Total Assets
$
$
1,198,807
356,719 $
$
859,306
$ 1,555,526 $ 1,387,682
1,143,586
244,096
843,142
As of or for the Year Ended December 31,
2016
2017
2018
$ 1,301,044
1,017,055
283,989
$
$
907,035
$ 1,331,801 $ 1,255,820 $ 1,051,316
810,870
769,737
444,950 $
281,579
756,398 $
645,653
(18,989)
$
809
29,118
(135,591)
$
$
(48,107)
136,400
$ 3,409,715 $ 3,329,137
$ 3,003,820
$ 2,826,352 $ 2,644,311 $ 2,333,371
1,815,910
$
517,461
$ 4,997,241 $ 4,928,677 $ 4,556,508
912,110
419,691 $
728,220 $
(60,975) $
34,669
(95,644) $
1,818,865
825,446 $
2,145,586
680,766 $
$
$
$
(a) Operating expenses include depreciation and amortization of property as set forth in table below.
Financial Advisory............................................................ $
Asset Management............................................................
Corporate ..........................................................................
Total .................................................................................. $
7,720 $
3,253
23,130
34,103 $
6,596 $
2,830
22,072
31,498 $
5,661
3,666
23,937
33,264
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2018
(b) Operating expenses include a benefit of $6,495 and $202,546 for the years ended December 31, 2018 and
2017, respectively, recorded for the benefit pursuant to the tax receivable agreement. See Note 19 for
information regarding the tax receivable agreement obligation.
128
LAZARD LTD
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—(Continued)
(dollars in thousands, except for per share data, unless otherwise noted)
Geographic Information
Due to the highly integrated nature of international financial markets, the Company manages its business
based on the profitability of the enterprise as a whole. Accordingly, management believes that profitability by
geographic region is not necessarily meaningful. The Company’s revenue and identifiable assets are generally
allocated based on the country or domicile of the legal entity providing the service.
The following table sets forth the net revenue from, and identifiable assets for, the Company and its
consolidated subsidiaries by geographic region allocated on the basis described above.
As of or for the Year Ended December 31,
2017
2018
2016
Net Revenue:
Americas ........................................................................... $ 1,615,736 $ 1,558,070 $ 1,399,285
795,932
EMEA ............................................................................... 1,022,994
Asia Pacific .......................................................................
138,154
187,622
Total .................................................................................. $ 2,826,352 $ 2,644,311 $ 2,333,371
903,525
182,716
Operating Income:
Americas (a)...................................................................... $
EMEA ...............................................................................
Asia Pacific .......................................................................
Total .................................................................................. $
434,111 $
206,578
40,077
680,766 $
596,044 $
193,781
35,621
825,446 $
335,887
168,745
12,829
517,461
Identifiable Assets:
Americas ........................................................................... $ 2,557,904 $ 2,600,412 $ 3,015,267
EMEA ............................................................................... 2,150,597 2,039,385 1,286,149
255,092
Asia Pacific .......................................................................
Total .................................................................................. $ 4,997,241 $ 4,928,677 $ 4,556,508
288,880
288,740
(a) Operating income includes a benefit of $6,495 and $202,546 for the years ended December 31, 2018 and
2017, respectively, recorded for the benefit pursuant to the tax receivable agreement. See Note 19 for
information regarding the tax receivable agreement obligation.
129
SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL INFORMATION
QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED)
The following represents the Company’s unaudited quarterly results for the years ended December 31, 2018
and 2017. These quarterly results were prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles and
reflect all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results. These
adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.
First
2018 Fiscal Quarter
Third
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Second
Fourth
Year
Net revenue................................................................ $ 754,698 $ 757,938 $ 626,481 $ 687,235 $2,826,352
Operating expenses.................................................... 568,870 557,998 487,800 530,918 2,145,586
Operating income ...................................................... $ 185,828 $ 199,940 $ 138,681 $ 156,317 $ 680,766
Net income................................................................. $ 161,661 $ 148,379 $ 108,725 $ 113,684 $ 532,449
Less - net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests ..........................................
5,324
Net income attributable to Lazard Ltd....................... $ 159,692 $ 146,963 $ 107,074 $ 113,396 $ 527,125
Attributable to Lazard Ltd Class A common
stockholders:
1,651
1,969
1,416
288
Net income per share of common stock:
Basic ............................................................... $
Diluted ............................................................ $
Dividends declared per share of common stock........ $
1.33 $
1.21 $
1.71 $
1.22 $
1.13 $
0.44 $
0.90 $
0.82 $
0.44 $
0.97 $
0.89 $
0.44 $
4.43
4.06
3.03
First
2017 Fiscal Quarter
Third
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Second
Fourth
Year
Net revenue................................................................ $ 623,464 $ 717,180 $ 624,859 $ 678,808 $2,644,311
Operating expenses.................................................... 473,267 544,679 480,647 320,272 1,818,865
Operating income ...................................................... $ 150,197 $ 172,501 $ 144,212 $ 358,536 $ 825,446
Net income (loss)....................................................... $ 110,430 $ 120,901 $ 111,470 $ (82,954) $ 259,847
Less - net income attributable to
noncontrolling interests ..........................................
6,264
Net income (loss) attributable to Lazard Ltd............. $ 107,553 $ 120,378 $ 109,210 $ (83,558) $ 253,583
Attributable to Lazard Ltd Class A common
stockholders:
2,260
2,877
604
523
Net income per share of common stock:
Basic ............................................................... $
Diluted ............................................................ $
Dividends declared per share of common stock........ $
0.88 $
0.81 $
1.58 $
0.98 $
0.91 $
0.41 $
0.90 $
0.82 $
0.41 $
(0.70) $
(0.70) $
0.41 $
2.09
1.91
2.81
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures
There were no changes in or disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosure during the
last two fiscal years.
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the
effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act as of the
end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive
130
Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report
on Form 10-K, our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) are
effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange
Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange
Commission rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
In addition, no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the
Exchange Act) occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-
15(f) of the Exchange Act), and the related report of our independent registered public accounting firm, are set forth
in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and are incorporated herein by reference.
Item 9B.
Other Information
None.
131
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
PART III
Information regarding members of the Board of Directors, including its audit committee and audit committee
financial expert, as well as information regarding our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our Chief
Executive Officer and senior financial officers, will be presented in Lazard Ltd’s definitive proxy statement for its
2019 annual general meeting of shareholders, which will be held in April 2019, and is incorporated herein by
reference. Information regarding our executive officers is included in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K
under the caption “Executive Officers of the Registrant”.
The information required to be furnished pursuant to this item with respect to compliance with Section 16(a)
of the Exchange Act will be set forth under the caption “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting and
Compliance” in Lazard Ltd’s definitive proxy statement for its 2019 annual general meeting of shareholders, and is
incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
Information regarding executive officer and director compensation will be presented in Lazard Ltd’s definitive
proxy statement for its 2019 annual general meeting of shareholders, which will be held in April 2019, and is
incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters
Information regarding security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related
shareholder matters will be presented in Lazard Ltd’s definitive proxy statement for its 2019 annual general meeting
of shareholders, which will be held in April 2019, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2018 regarding securities issued under our 2018
Incentive Compensation Plan, 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan and 2005 Equity Incentive Plan.
Equity compensation
plans approved by
security holders..............
Equity compensation
plans approved by
security holders..............
Equity compensation
plans not approved by
security holders..............
Total..................................
Plan
Category
2018 Incentive
Compensation Plan(1)
2008 Incentive
Compensation Plan(2)
2005 Equity Incentive
Plan(3)
Number of Securities
to be Issued Upon
Exercise of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding
Options,
Warrants and Rights
Number of Securities
Remaining Available
for Future Issuance
Under Equity
Compensation Plans
(Excluding Securities
Reflected in the
Second Column)
115,092
(5)
29,874,262
14,858,011 (4)
25,602 (4)
14,998,705 (4)
(5)
(5)
-
- (6)
29,874,262
(1) Our 2018 Incentive Compensation Plan was approved by the stockholders of Lazard Ltd on April 24, 2018
and replaced the 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan, which was terminated on April 24, 2018. The 2018 Plan
authorizes the issuance of up to 30 million shares of Class A common stock.
132
(2) Our 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan was approved by the stockholders of Lazard Ltd on May 6, 2008. The
2008 Incentive Compensation Plan was terminated on April 24, 2018, although awards granted under the 2008
Incentive Compensation Plan remain outstanding and continue to be subject to its terms.
(3) Our 2005 Equity Incentive Plan was established prior to our equity public offering in May 2005 and, as a
result, did not require approval by security holders. The 2005 Equity Incentive Plan expired in the second
quarter of 2015, although awards granted under the 2005 Equity Incentive Plan remain outstanding and
continue to be subject to its terms.
(4) Represents outstanding stock unit awards, after giving effect to forfeitures, as of December 31, 2018. As of
that date, the only grants made under the 2018 Incentive Compensation Plan, 2008 Incentive Compensation
Plan and 2005 Equity Incentive Plan have been in the form of stock unit awards and restricted stock awards.
See Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of the plans.
(5)
Each restricted stock unit awarded under our 2018 Incentive Compensation Plan, 2008 Incentive
Compensation Plan and 2005 Equity Incentive Plan was granted at no cost to the persons receiving them and
represents the contingent right to receive the equivalent number of shares of Lazard Ltd Class A common
stock. Performance-based restricted stock units awarded represent the contingent right to receive Class A
common stock based on the achievement of performance criteria, and the number of shares of Class A
common stock that ultimately may be received generally can range from zero to two times the target number.
See Note 15 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(6) Gives effect to the number of securities remaining available for future issuance, after considering the impact
of vested restricted stock units that will not be delivered as a result of withholding taxes.
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Information regarding certain relationships and related transactions, and director independence, will be
presented in Lazard Ltd’s definitive proxy statement for its 2019 annual general meeting of shareholders, which will
be held in April 2019, and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14.
Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Information regarding principal accountant fees and services will be presented in Lazard Ltd’s definitive
proxy statement for its 2019 annual general meeting of shareholders, which will be held in April 2019, and is
incorporated herein by reference.
133
PART IV
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
(a) Documents filed as part of this Report:
1.
Consolidated Financial Statements
The consolidated financial statements required to be filed in the Annual Report on Form 10-K are listed
on page F-1 hereof and in Part II, Item 8 hereof.
2.
Financial Statement Schedule
The financial statement schedule required in the Annual Report on Form 10-K is listed on page F-1
hereof. The required schedule appears on pages F-2 through F-6 hereof. All other schedules have been
omitted because they are not applicable, not required or the information required is included in the
Company’s consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
3.
Exhibits
3.1
3.2
3.3
3.4
3.5
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.5
4.6
Certificate of Incorporation and Memorandum of Association of the Registrant (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (File No. 333-121407) on Form S-
1/A filed on March 21, 2005).
Certificate of Incorporation in Change of Name of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (File No. 333-121407) on Form S-1/A filed on
March 21, 2005).
Amended and Restated Bye-Laws of Lazard Ltd (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the
Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on June 16, 2005).
First Amendment to Amended and Restated Bye-Laws of Lazard Ltd (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.4 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on May 9,
2008).
Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated Bye-Laws of Lazard Ltd (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.5 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on
April 30, 2010).
Form of Specimen Certificate for Class A common stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
the Registrant’s Registration Statement (File No. 333-121407) on Form S-1/A filed on April 11, 2005).
Indenture, dated as of May 10, 2005, by and between Lazard Group LLC and The Bank of New York,
as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Lazard Group LLC’s Registration Statement
(File No. 333-126751) on Form S-4 filed on July 21, 2005).
Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 14, 2013, between Lazard Group LLC and The
Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32492) filed on November 14, 2013).
Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 13, 2015, between Lazard Group LLC and The
Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32492) filed on February 13, 2015).
Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 4, 2016, between Lazard Group LLC and The
Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32492) filed on November 7, 2016).
Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 19, 2018, between Lazard Group LLC and the
Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 001-32492) filed on September 19, 2018.
4.7
Form of Senior Note (included in Exhibits 4.3, 4.4, 4.5 and 4.6).
134
10.1
10.2
10.3
10.4
10.5*
10.6*
10.7*
10.8*
10.9*
10.10*
10.11*
10.12*
10.13*
Amended and Restated Operating Agreement of Lazard Group LLC, dated as of February 4, 2019
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to Registrant’s Current Report (File No. 001-32492) on
Form 8-K filed on February 5, 2019).
Second Amended and Restated Tax Receivable Agreement, dated as of October 26, 2015, by and
among Ltd Sub A, Ltd Sub B and LTBP Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on October 28, 2015).
Lease, dated as of January 27, 1994, by and between Rockefeller Center Properties and Lazard Frères
& Co. LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement (File
No. 333-121407) on Form S-1/A filed on February 11, 2005).
Fourth Amendment dated as of February 16, 2011, by and among RCPI Landmark Properties, L.L.C.
(as the successor in interest to Rockefeller Center Properties), RCPI 30 Rock 22234849, L.L.C. and
Lazard Group LLC (as the successor in interest to Lazard Frères & Co. LLC), to the Lease dated as of
January 27, 1994, by and among Rockefeller Center Properties and Lazard Frères & Co. LLC
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492)
on Form 10-Q filed on April 29, 2011).
Lazard Ltd 2005 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 to the Registrant’s
Registration Statement (File No. 333-121407) on Form S-1/A filed on May 2, 2005).
Lazard Ltd 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Annex B to the
Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A (File No. 001-32492) filed on March 24,
2008).
Lazard Ltd 2016 French Sub-plan (incorporated by reference to Annex B to the Registrant’s Definitive
Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A (File No. 001-32492) filed on March 10, 2016).
Lazard Ltd 2018 Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Annex B to the
Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A (File No. 001-32492) filed on March 15,
2018).
Amended and Restated Agreement relating to Retention and Noncompetition and Other Covenants,
dated as of March 9, 2016, by and among the Registrant, Lazard Group LLC and Kenneth M. Jacobs
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on
Form 10-Q filed on April 27, 2016).
Amended and Restated Agreement relating to Retention and Noncompetition and Other Covenants,
dated as of March 9, 2016, by and among the Registrant, Lazard Group LLC and Ashish Bhutani
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492)
on Form 10-Q filed on April 27, 2016).
Amended and Restated Agreement relating to Retention and Noncompetition and Other Covenants,
dated as of March 9, 2016, by and among the Registrant, Lazard Group LLC and Scott D. Hoffman
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492)
on Form 10-Q filed on April 27, 2016).
Amendment, dated as of October 30, 2017, to Amended and Restated Agreement relating to Retention
and Noncompetition and Other Covenants, dated as of March 9, 2016, by and among the Registrant,
Lazard Group LLC and Scott D. Hoffman (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the
Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on October 31, 2017).
Agreement relating to Retention and Noncompetition and Other Covenants, dated as of October 30,
2017, by and among the Registrant, Lazard Group LLC and Evan L. Russo (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.15 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on
October 31, 2017).
135
10.14*
10.15*
10.16*
10.17*
10.18*
10.19
10.20*
10.21*
10.22*
10.23*
10.24*
21.1
23.1
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
Amended and Restated Agreement relating to Retention and Noncompetition and Other Covenants,
dated as of March 9, 2016, by and among the Registrant, Lazard Group LLC and Alexander F. Stern
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492)
on Form 10-Q filed on April 27, 2016).
Form of Award Letter for Annual Grant of Deferred Stock Units to Non-Executive Directors
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K
(File No. 001-32492) filed on September 8, 2005).
Form of Agreement evidencing a grant of Restricted Stock Units to Executive Officers under the 2008
Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.41 to the Registrant’s Annual
Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-K filed on March 2, 2009).
Form of Agreement evidencing a grant of Deferred Cash Award to Executive Officers (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.42 to the Registrant’s Annual Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-K filed
on March 2, 2009).
Directors’ Fee Deferral Unit Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.39 to the Registrant’s
Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on May 11, 2006).
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of September 25, 2015, among Lazard Group LLC,
the Banks from time to time parties thereto, and Citibank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.27 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q
filed on October 28, 2015).
Form of Agreement evidencing a grant of Lazard Fund Interests to Named Executive Officers
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.55 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492)
on Form 10-Q filed on May 1, 2013).
Form of Agreement evidencing a February 20, 2014 grant of Performance-Based Stock Units under the
2008 Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.55 to the Registrant’s
Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed May 6, 2014).
Agreement between the Company and Kenneth M. Jacobs, dated as of February 20, 2014, evidencing a
grant of Performance-Based Stock Units under the 2008 Incentive Compensation Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.56 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q
filed on May 6, 2014).
Form of Agreement evidencing a grant of Restricted Stock under the 2008 Incentive Compensation
Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.55 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-
32492) on Form 10-Q filed on April 30, 2010).
Form of Agreement evidencing a grant of Lazard Fund Interests (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.55 to the Registrant’s Quarterly Report (File No. 001-32492) on Form 10-Q filed on April 29,
2011).
Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Kenneth M. Jacobs.
Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Evan L. Russo.
Section 1350 Certification for Kenneth M. Jacobs.
Section 1350 Certification for Evan L. Russo.
101.INS
XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
136
101.DEF
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
101.PRE
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
*
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
137
LAZARD LTD
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
ITEMS 15(a)(1) AND 15(a)(2)
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting .............................................................
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm ...........................................................................
Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 .....................................
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 ..................
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2018,
2017 and 2016 ..............................................................................................................................................
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 .................
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2018,
2017 and 2016 ..............................................................................................................................................
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.....................................................................................................
Supplemental Financial Information
Page
No.
70
71
73
75
76
77
79
82
Quarterly Results...............................................................................................................................................
130
Financial Statement Schedules
Schedule I—Condensed Financial Information of Registrant (Parent Company Only)
Condensed Statements of Financial Condition as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 ..............................
Condensed Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016............
Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2018,
2017 and 2016 ....................................................................................................................................
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016...........
Notes to Condensed Financial Statements ..............................................................................................
F-2
F-3
F-4
F-5
F-6
Schedules not listed above have been omitted because the information required to be set forth therein is not
applicable or is shown in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.
F-1
LAZARD LTD
(parent company only)
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
DECEMBER 31, 2018 AND 2017
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)
December 31,
2018
2017
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents ............................................................................. $
Investments in subsidiaries, equity method...................................................
Due from subsidiaries....................................................................................
Other assets....................................................................................................
Total assets ............................................................................................... $
4,136 $
(1,275,357)
2,191,915
19
920,713 $
3,921
(1,061,259)
2,259,112
-
1,201,774
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities:
Due to subsidiaries......................................................................................... $
Other liabilities ..............................................................................................
Total liabilities .........................................................................................
3,707 $
155
3,862
1,847
124
1,971
Commitments and contingencies
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share; 15,000,000 shares authorized:
Series A—no shares issued and outstanding............................................
Series B—no shares issued and outstanding............................................
-
-
-
-
Common stock:
Class A, par value $.01 per share (500,000,000 shares authorized;
129,766,091 shares issued at December 31, 2018 and 2017,
including shares held by subsidiaries as indicated below)....................
Additional paid-in-capital..............................................................................
Retained earnings ..........................................................................................
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax .......................................
Class A common stock held by subsidiaries, at cost (17,574,805 and
10,747,142 shares at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively) ............
Total stockholders’ equity........................................................................
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity ................................................. $
1,298
750,692
1,195,563
(273,818)
1,673,735
(756,884)
916,851
920,713 $
1,298
788,140
1,080,413
(232,518)
1,637,333
(437,530)
1,199,803
1,201,774
See notes to condensed financial statements.
F-2
LAZARD LTD
(parent company only)
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017 AND 2016
(dollars in thousands)
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2018
REVENUE
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries................................................ $
Interest and other income ............................................................
Total revenue..........................................................................
392,574 $
136,399
528,973
145,008 $
110,381
255,389
OPERATING EXPENSES
Professional services....................................................................
Other ............................................................................................
Total operating expenses........................................................
NET INCOME................................................................................. $
1,719
129
1,848
527,125 $
1,692
114
1,806
253,583 $
326,366
63,019
389,385
1,580
107
1,687
387,698
See notes to condensed financial statements.
F-3
LAZARD LTD
(parent company only)
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017 AND 2016
(dollars in thousands)
NET INCOME................................................................................. $
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET
OF TAX:
Currency translation adjustments ................................................
Employee benefit plans:
Prior service costs (net of tax benefit of $543
for the year ended December 31, 2018) ..............................
Actuarial gain (loss) (net of tax expense (benefit) of
$131, $(3,507) and $(5,205) for the years ended
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively).............
Adjustments for items reclassified to earnings (net of tax
expense of $2,335, $2,220 and $1,757 for the
years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016,
respectively) ........................................................................
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS), NET OF
TAX ...............................................................................................
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ..................................................... $
Year Ended December 31,
2017
253,583 $
2018
527,125 $
2016
387,698
(46,601)
71,668
(57,919)
(2,653)
(2,781)
2,085
(24,473)
10,735
7,951
2,526
(41,300)
485,825 $
81,704
335,287 $
(79,866)
307,832
See notes to condensed financial statements.
F-4
LAZARD LTD
(parent company only)
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018, 2017 AND 2016
(dollars in thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income ........................................................................................ $
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Year Ended December 31,
2017
2016
2018
527,125 $
253,583 $
387,698
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries................................................
Dividends received from subsidiaries..........................................
Changes in due to/from subsidiaries............................................
Changes in other operating assets and liabilities .........................
Net cash provided by operating activities ..............................
(392,574)
189,786
35,504
13
359,854
(145,008)
63,822
169,056
27
341,480
(326,366)
-
273,051
(233)
334,150
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Capital contribution to subsidiaries .............................................
Net cash used in investing activities ......................................
-
-
(25)
(25)
-
-
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Class A common stock dividends................................................
Net cash used in financing activities......................................
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents .......................
Cash and cash equivalents, January 1 ...............................................
Cash and cash equivalents, December 31 ......................................... $
(359,639)
(359,639)
215
3,921
4,136 $
(341,450)
(341,450)
5
3,916
3,921 $
(336,138)
(336,138)
(1,988)
5,904
3,916
See notes to condensed financial statements.
F-5
LAZARD LTD
(parent company only)
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying Lazard Ltd condensed financial statements (the “Parent Company Financial Statements”),
including the notes thereto, should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of Lazard Ltd
and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) and the notes thereto.
The Parent Company Financial Statements as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2018, are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”), which require management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenue and expenses, and the disclosures in the condensed
financial statements. Management believes that the estimates utilized in the preparation of the condensed financial
statements are reasonable. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates.
The Parent Company Financial Statements include investments in subsidiaries, accounted for under the equity
method.
For the period ended December 31, 2016, equity in earnings of subsidiaries also includes a gain of $12,668
related to the portion of a business acquired in the fourth quarter of 2016 that was previously owned by one of the
Company’s subsidiaries.
F-6
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the
Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: February 25, 2019
LAZARD LTD
By: /s/ Kenneth M. Jacobs
Kenneth M. Jacobs
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this Report has been signed
below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
Capacity
Date
/s/ Kenneth M. Jacobs
Kenneth M. Jacobs
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
February 25, 2019
/s/ Evan L. Russo
Evan L. Russo
/s/ Dominick Ragone
Dominick Ragone
/s/ Andrew M. Alper
Andrew M. Alper
/s/ Ashish Bhutani
Ashish Bhutani
/s/ Richard N. Haass
Richard N. Haass
/s/ Steven J. Heyer
Steven J. Heyer
/s/ Michelle Jarrard
Michelle Jarrard
/s/ Sylvia Jay
Sylvia Jay
/s/ Iris Knobloch
Iris Knobloch
/s/ Philip A. Laskawy
Philip A. Laskawy
/s/ Jane L. Mendillo
Jane L. Mendillo
/s/ Richard D. Parsons
Richard D. Parsons
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
Chief Accounting Officer
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
Director
II-1
February 25, 2019
February 25, 2019
February 25, 2019
February 25, 2019
February 25, 2019
February 25, 2019
February 25, 2019
February 25, 2019
February 25, 2019
February 25, 2019
February 25, 2019
February 25, 2019
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
SCHEDULE A
RECONCILIATION OF U.S. GAAP MEASURES TO ADJUSTED MEASURES
(unaudited)
(dollars in millions, except per share data)
Year Ended December 31,
2018
2017
2016
2015
2014
OPERATING REVENUE (a)
Net Revenue—U.S. GAAP Basis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,826 $2,644 $2,333 $2,354 $2,300
Adjustments:
Revenue related to noncontrolling interests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(Gain) loss related to Lazard Fund Interests and other similar
arrangements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Distribution fees, reimbursable deal costs and bad debt expense . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on acquisition of MBA Lazard and private equity revenue adjustment . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
(19)
(16)
(21)
(16)
(15)
14
(121)
—
54
(23)
—
—
50
(3)
—
(13)
48
4
—
(12)
50
(7)
—
—
62
Operating Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,755 $2,655 $2,344 $2,380 $2,340
NET INCOME, AS ADJUSTED (b)
Net Income Attributable to Lazard Ltd—U.S. GAAP Basis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments:
$527
$254
$388
$986
$427
Reduction of deferred tax assets (net of TRA reduction) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reduction of TRA obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expenses associated with ERP system implementation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expenses relating to office space reorganization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on partial extinguishment of TRA obligation (net of tax) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recognition of deferred tax assets (net of TRA accrual) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Acquisition-related (benefits) costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Charges pertaining to senior debt refinancing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expenses associated with the Lazard Foundation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
MBA Lazard acquisition and private equity revenue adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . .
Valuation allowance for changed tax laws . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Tax benefits allocated to adjustments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
(7)
29
2
—
—
(19)
7
10
—
—
(10)
217
—
25
11
—
—
7
—
—
—
—
(13)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
— (259)
— (294)
—
34
63
4
—
—
(12)
(13)
—
12
(4)
(15)
Adjustment for full exchange of exchangeable interests:
Amount attributable to LAZ-MD Holdings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
1
Net Income, as adjusted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$539
$501
$410
$480
$428
DILUTED NET INCOME PER SHARE:
U.S. GAAP Basis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-GAAP Basis, as adjusted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
$4.06
$4.16
$1.91
$3.78
$2.92
$3.09
$7.40
$3.60
$3.20
$3.20
This document includes non-U.S. GAAP (“non-GAAP”) measures. We have provided reconciliations of
these measures for each period discussed to the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measure. Our non-GAAP
measures are not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the corresponding U.S. GAAP
measures, and should be read only in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements prepared in
accordance with U.S. GAAP.
(a) A non-GAAP measure which excludes (i) revenue related to non-controlling interests (see (c) below), (ii) gains/losses
related to the changes in the fair value of investments held in connection with Lazard Fund Interests and other similar
deferred compensation arrangements for which a corresponding equal amount is excluded from compensation and
benefits expense, and (iii) interest expense primarily related to corporate financing activities. For 2018, excludes revenue
related to certain distribution fees and reimbursable deal costs paid to third parties for which an equal amount is excluded
from non-GAAP non-compensation expense, and excludes bad debt expense. For 2016, excludes a gain on the
acquisition of MBA Lazard (which resulted from the increase in the fair value of the Company’s investment in MBA
Lazard prior to the acquisition). For 2015, includes an adjustment to revenue relating to the Company’s disposal of the
Australian private equity business for the recognition of an obligation which was previously recognized for U.S. GAAP.
(b) A non-GAAP measure. For 2018, excludes (i) a reduction in our tax receivable agreement (“TRA”) obligation as a result
of tax rate adjustments associated with the 2017 U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, (ii) expenses associated with the Enterprise
Resource Planning (“ERP”) system implementation, (iii) incremental rent expense and lease abandonment costs related
to office space reorganization, (iv) acquisition-related benefits, primarily reflecting changes in fair value of contingent
consideration associated with certain business acquisitions, (v) charges pertaining to a partial redemption of Lazard
Group’s 4.25% senior notes due in 2020 (the “2020 Notes”), and (vi) expenses associated with the unconditional
commitment to the Lazard Foundation. For 2017, excludes (i) as a result of the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, reduction of
deferred tax assets (net of a reduction in our TRA obligation), (ii) expenses associated with the ERP system
implementation, (iii) incremental rent expense and lease abandonment costs related to office space reorganization, and
(iv) acquisition-related costs, primarily reflecting changes in fair value of contingent consideration associated with
certain business acquisitions. For 2016, excludes (i) acquisition-related costs, primarily reflecting changes in fair value of
contingent consideration associated with certain business acquisitions, (ii) a gain on the acquisition of MBA Lazard
(which resulted from the increase in the fair value of the Company’s investment in MBA Lazard prior to the acquisition),
(iii) charges pertaining to the redemption of the remaining balance of the 6.85% senior notes due 2017 (the “2017
Notes”), and (iv) a valuation allowance associated with changes in certain New York City UBT tax laws. For 2015,
excludes (i) a gain related to the partial extinguishment of our TRA obligation, net of applicable tax expense, (ii) charges
pertaining to the redemption of a significant portion of the 2017 Notes, and (iii) recognition of deferred tax assets, net of
the related provision pursuant to the TRA. In addition, for 2015, includes an adjustment relating to the Company’s
disposal of the Australian private equity business for the recognition of an obligation which was previously recognized
for U.S. GAAP. For 2014, is adjusted to reflect the full conversion of outstanding exchangeable interests held by
members of LAZ-MD Holdings LLC.
(c) Noncontrolling interests include revenue and expenses principally related to Edgewater, and is a non-GAAP measure.
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
[THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
Corporate Information
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Kenneth M. Jacobs
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Ashish Bhutani
Vice Chairman of Lazard and
Chief Executive Officer of Lazard Asset Management
Scott D. Hoffman
Chief Administrative Officer and General Counsel
Evan L. Russo
Chief Financial Officer
Alexander F. Stern
Chief Operating Officer and
Chief Executive Officer of Financial Advisory
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Kenneth M. Jacobs
Andrew M. Alper
Ashish Bhutani
Richard N. Haass
Steven J. Heyer
Michelle Jarrard
Sylvia Jay
Iris Knobloch
Philip A. Laskawy
Jane L. Mendillo
Richard D. Parsons
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Deloitte & Touche LLP
30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10112
+1 (212) 492-4000
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR
Computershare
P.O. Box 505000
Louisville, KY 40233
(800) 368-5948 U.S.
+1 (201) 680-6578 International
www-us.computershare.com/Investor
SHAREHOLDER INQUIRIES
Alexandra Deignan
30 Rockefeller Plaza
New York, NY 10112
+1 (212) 632-6886
alexandra.deignan@lazard.com
www.lazard.com
|
2
0
1
8
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T
www.lazard.com
@lazard