2006 Annual Report Cover_final2.Page 1 3/19/07 10:05:48 AM
2006 Annual Report Cover_final2.Page 1 3/19/07 10:05:48 AM
C
M
Y
CM
MY
CY
CMY
K
April 2, 2007
TO OUR SHAREHOLDERS:
Thank you, our valued shareholders, for your continued support.
In 2006 we have continued to better position our company in this highly competitive environment. We
have initiatives to reposition the way we operate based on the two key drivers for our business: our
customers and our employees. This is not just about any specific initiative or process change, but
represents a cultural shift throughout our company, without losing that which has made us successful
to date: our foresight; a drive for continuous improvement; a cohesive and experienced executive
team; dedicated employees and the development and institution of a common language.
Over the last few years, we have developed the underlying infrastructure and trained our employees
for a new customer-focused model. Our entire team is committed to improving our market position
with exceptional customer service at each of our stores. Now that the key components and initiatives
are well established, we are poised to bring them all together into a stronger, more competitive, and
more easily replicated model.
Lithia Support Services is our core team that develops and delivers the leadership and support to our
stores. It also executes all the processes that can be more effectively performed offsite. By
removing non-value added functions from our stores, front line employees can focus on what is
important: developing relationships with our customers, supporting the manufacturers we represent,
and enhancing the effectiveness of their teams.
We are also developing a new independent used car business, called L2 Auto, which promises to
provide a new customer experience. The expertise and knowledge of Support Services will also be
utilized to help manage this new business. We are excited about the incremental contribution to
Lithia from the L2 Auto outlets.
To support our growth, we are developing our leaders by continuing to implement and ingrain sound
human development practices into our culture. We know that long term, we can only reach our
potential through our people so we continue to embrace strategies which best support and empower
our employees.
At the store level we are focused on creating more customer-centric processes for new and used
vehicle sales and the parts and service businesses. What will emerge is a new customer-driven
model that specifically addresses our customer’s needs by creating transparency in the car buying
process, thus reducing negotiation and speeding up the sale. By utilizing the internet and online
technologies, we can provide more information and make everything about buying or servicing a car
much quicker and easier than with our current processes. This technology-driven customer-centric
model is the fundamental objective of L2 Auto. The development and integration of the key
customer-driven processes within the L2 Auto model will also help us accelerate the cultural changes
within our new vehicle stores. Once achieved, we will be better able to leverage and grow the value
of the Lithia brand with one message based on the customers experience and word of mouth
advertising. This will in turn make for a more cost effective, profitable, and successful model.
Now is the time to do the hard work of changing the way that vehicles are sold and serviced at Lithia.
We will need the patience of all the stake holders—especially you, our stockholders—to meet these
goals. Our mission is to be the preferred provider of cars and trucks and related services in North
America. We can only achieve that goal by simplifying and creating a more customer-centric sales
process and by growing strong dedicated employees.
Thank you again for being such an important part of our past success and we are counting on you to
support us as we move forward.
Sincerely,
Sidney B. DeBoer
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K
___________________
[X]
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended: December 31, 2006
OR
[ ]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number: 001-14733
LITHIA MOTORS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
Oregon
93-0572810
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
360 E. Jackson Street, Medford, Oregon
(Address of principal executive offices)
97501
(Zip Code)
541-776-6899
(Registrant’s telephone number including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Class A common stock, without par value
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
(Title of Class)
__________ _________
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act:
Yes [ ] No [X]
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act: [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days: Yes [X] No [ ]
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and
will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this Form 10-K, or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See
definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer [ ]
Accelerated filer [X] Non-accelerated filer [ ]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ]
No [ X ]
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was
$467,158,129, computed by reference to the last sales price ($30.32) as reported by the New York Stock Exchange for the
Registrant’s Class A common stock, as of the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal
quarter (June 30, 2006).
The number of shares outstanding of the Registrant’s common stock as of March 6, 2007 was: Class A: 15,855,801 shares
and Class B: 3,762,231 shares.
Documents Incorporated by Reference
The Registrant has incorporated into Part III of Form 10-K, by reference, portions of its Proxy Statement for its 2007 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders.
(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
LITHIA MOTORS, INC.
2006 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I
Item 1.
Business
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
Item 1B.
Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2.
Properties
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
Item 4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
PART II
Item 5.
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data
Item 7.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Item 9A.
Controls and Procedures
Item 9B.
Other Information
Item 10.
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Item 11.
Executive Compensation
PART III
Item 12.
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder
Matters
Item 13.
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Item 14.
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
PART IV
Item 15.
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Signatures
Page
2
12
18
18
18
19
19
22
23
38
40
40
40
41
41
41
42
42
42
43
46
1
Item 1. Business
Forward Looking Statements
PART I
Some of the statements under the sections entitled “Risk Factors,” “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and “Business” and elsewhere in this Form 10-
K constitute forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by
terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “intend,” “forecast,” “anticipate,” “believe,”
“estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” and “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable
terminology. The forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K involve known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and situations that may cause our actual results, level of activity, performance or
achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by these statements. Some of the important factors that could cause
actual results to differ from our expectations are discussed in Item 1A. to this Form 10-K.
Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we
cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. You should not place
undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.
Where You Can Find More Information
We file annual, quarterly and special reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities
and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as amended (the
“Exchange Act”). You can inspect and copy our reports, proxy statements, and other information filed with
the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call
the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the Public Reference Room. The SEC maintains
an Internet Web site at http://www.sec.gov where you can obtain some of our SEC filings. We also make
available, free of charge on our website at www.lithia.com, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly
reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished
pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably practicable after they are
filed electronically with the SEC. The information found on our website is not part of this Form 10-K. You
can also obtain copies of these reports by contacting Investor Relations at 541-776-6591.
Compliance with Section 303A of the NYSE Listed Company Manual
As required by the NYSE Corporate Governance Standards, we filed the appropriate certifications with
NYSE in 2006 confirming that our CEO is not aware of any violations of the NYSE Corporate Governance
Standards and we also filed with the SEC in 2006 the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
certifications required under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Overview
We are a leading operator of automotive franchises and retailer of new and used vehicles and services.
As of March 6, 2007, we offered 30 brands of new vehicles through 193 franchises in 108 stores in the
Western United States and over the Internet. As of December 31, 2006 we operated 16 stores in Oregon,
15 in California, 14 in Texas, 12 in Washington, 8 in Iowa, 7 in Idaho, 7 in Colorado, 7 in Alaska, 7 in
Montana, 6 in Nevada, 3 in Nebraska, 2 in South Dakota, 2 in North Dakota, 1 in New Mexico and 1 in
Wisconsin. We sell new and used cars and light trucks; sell replacement parts; provide vehicle
maintenance, warranty, paint and repair services; and arrange related financing, service contracts,
protection products and credit insurance for our automotive customers.
2
We currently achieve gross profit margins above industry averages by selling a higher ratio of retail used
vehicles to new vehicles and by arranging finance and extended warranty contracts for a greater
percentage of our customers than the industry on average. In 2006, we achieved a gross profit margin of
17.0%.
We were founded in 1946 and incorporated in 1968. Our two senior executives have managed the
company for more than 35 years. Since our initial public offering in 1996, we have grown from 5 to 108
stores as of March 6, 2007, primarily through an aggressive acquisition program that has been accretive
to our earnings, increasing annual revenues from $143 million in 1996 to $3.2 billion in 2006. In addition,
since our initial public offering through December 31, 2006, we have achieved compound annual growth
rates of 36% per year for revenues, 32% per year for net income from continuing operations and 15% per
year for earnings per share, together with a 3% average annual same store sales increase.
The Industry
At approximately $1.0 trillion in annual sales, automotive retailing is the largest retail trade sector in the
United States and comprises roughly 10% of the GDP. The industry is highly fragmented with the 100
largest automotive retailers generating approximately 17% of total industry revenues in 2005. The number
of franchised stores in the U.S. has declined in the last 10 years from approximately 22,427 stores in
1997 to approximately 22,089 in 2006. The average price of a new vehicle sold in the past ten years
increased 18.8% from $18,542 in 1996 to $22,021 in 2005. In addition to these new vehicle outlets, used
vehicles are sold by approximately 53,000 independent used vehicle dealers and through casual (person
to person) transactions. New vehicles can only be sold through automotive retail stores franchised by
automotive manufacturers. These franchise stores have designated trade territories under state franchise
law protection, which limits the number of new stores that can be opened in any given area.
Consolidation is expected to continue as many smaller automotive retailers are now considering selling or
joining forces with larger retailer groups, given the large capital requirements necessary to operate in
today’s retail environment. With many owners reaching retirement age, often without clear succession
plans, larger, well-capitalized automotive retailers provide an attractive exit strategy. We believe these
factors provide an attractive environment for continuing consolidation.
Unlike many other retailing segments, automotive manufacturers provide unparalleled support to the
automotive retailer. Manufacturers often bear the burden of markdown risks on slow-moving inventory as
they provide aggressive dealer and customer incentives to clear aged inventory in order to free the
inventory pipeline for new purchases. In addition, an automotive retailer’s cash investment in inventory is
relatively small, given floorplan financing from manufacturers. Furthermore, manufacturers provide low-
cost financing for working capital and acquisitions and credit to consumers to finance vehicle purchases,
as well as pay market rate prices to their dealers for servicing vehicles under manufacturers’ warranties.
Sales in the automotive sector are affected by general economic conditions including rates of
employment, income growth, interest rates and consumer sentiment.
U.S. new vehicle sales were 16.6 million units in 2006 compared to 17.0 million units in 2005. Although
manufacturer incentives were lower in 2006 than in 2005, we expect that manufacturers will continue to
offer incentives on new vehicle sales during 2007 through a combination of repricing strategies, rebates,
lease programs, early lease cancellation programs and low interest rate loans to consumers. To
complement the manufacturers’ incentive strategy, we employ a volume-based strategy for our new
vehicle sales. New vehicle sales usually decline during a weak economy; however, the higher margin
service and parts business typically benefits in the same environment, particularly if extended, because
consumers tend to keep their vehicles longer. Strong sales of new vehicles in recent years have provided
a population of vehicles for future service and parts revenues. Automotive retailers benefit from their
designation as an exclusive warranty and recall service provider of a manufacturer. For the typical
manufacturer’s warranty, this provides an automotive retailer with a period of at least 3 years of repeat
3
business for service covered by warranty. Extended warranties can add two or more years to this repeat
servicing period.
Profitability amongst automotive retailers will vary and depends in part on local economic conditions,
competition and product mix, effective management of inventory, marketing, quality control and
responsiveness to customers. In the industry, new vehicles sales typically account for an estimated 60%
of a store’s revenues, used vehicles sales typically account for approximately 28% of revenues and the
remaining 12% is typically derived from service and parts sales. Finance and insurance sales are
included in the new and used vehicle sales numbers. Industry gross profit margins were 13.3% in 2005.
Our gross profit margin was 17.0% and 17.2% in 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Automotive retailers have much lower fixed overhead costs than automobile manufacturers and parts
suppliers. Variable and discretionary costs, such as sales commissions and personnel, advertising and
inventory finance expenses, can be adjusted to more closely match new vehicle sales. Variable and
discretionary costs account for an estimated 60-65% of the industry’s total expenses. Moreover, an
automotive retailer can enhance its profitability from sales of higher margin products and services. Gross
profit margins for the parts and service business are significantly higher at approximately 48%, given the
labor-intensive nature of the product category. Gross profit margins for finance and insurance are virtually
100% as they are fee driven income items. These supplemental, high margin products and services
provide substantial incremental revenue and net income, decreasing reliance on the highly competitive
new vehicle sales.
Store Operations
Each of our stores is its own profit center and is managed by a general manager who has primary
responsibility for pricing, personnel and advertising. In order to provide additional support for improving
performance, we make available to each store a team of specialists in new vehicle sales, used vehicle
sales, finance and insurance, service and parts, and back-office administration.
The following tables set forth information about our stores as of December 31, 2006:
State
Texas .............................
Oregon...........................
California........................
Washington ....................
Idaho..............................
Colorado ........................
Alaska ............................
Montana.........................
Nevada ..........................
Iowa……………………..
Nebraska .......................
South Dakota .................
North Dakota..................
New Mexico ...................
Wisconsin………………
Total..........................
Number of
Stores
14
16
15
12
7
7
7
7
6
4
3
2
2
1
1
104
Number of
Franchises
23
30
28
18
14
12
10
13
10
7
5
2
9
3
3
187
Percent of
Annualized
2006 Revenue
17%
16
15
11
8
6
5
5
5
3
3
2
2
1
1
100%
4
New Vehicle Sales
In 2006, we sold 28 domestic and imported brands ranging from economy to luxury cars, sport utility
vehicles, minivans and light trucks.
Manufacturer
DaimlerChrysler (Chrysler, Dodge, Jeep)
General Motors (GMC, Chevrolet, Buick, Saturn, Cadillac, Hummer)
Toyota, Scion
Ford (Ford, Lincoln, Mercury)
Honda
BMW
Hyundai
Nissan
Subaru
Volkswagen, Audi
Mercedes
Mazda
Suzuki
Saab
Porsche
Kia
Isuzu
Percent of
Total
Revenue
24.0%
11.2
6.3
4.2
2.6
2.4
1.7
1.7
1.5
1.0
0.8
0.3
0.3
*
*
*
*
58.0%
Percent of
New Vehicle
Sales in 2006
41.0%
19.4
10.9
7.3
4.5
4.1
3.0
2.9
2.7
1.6
1.3
0.6
0.5
0.1
0.1
*
*
100.0%
* Less than 0.1%
Our unit and dollar sales of new vehicles from continuing operations were as follows:
New vehicle units……………………..
New vehicle sales (in thousands)…..
Average selling price…………………
2006
66,224
$1,841,463
$27,807
Year Ended December 31,
2004
53,169
$1,495,442
$28,126
2003
51,258
$1,374,359
$26,813
2005
58,372
$1,631,316
$27,947
2002
45,551
$1,186,846
$26,055
The year over year average new vehicle sales price decreased by $140 to $27,807 in 2006 due primarily
to our strategy of selling volume and driving same store sales growth in the year, as well as a mix shift
away from higher-priced trucks and SUVs.
We purchase our new car inventory directly from manufacturers, who generally allocate new vehicles to
stores based on the number of vehicles sold by the store on a monthly basis and by the store’s market
area. Accordingly, we rely on the manufacturers to provide us with vehicles that consumers’ desire and to
supply us with such vehicles at suitable locations, quantities and prices. However, high demand vehicles
often are in short supply. We attempt to exchange vehicles with other automotive retailers (and amongst
our own stores) to accommodate customer demand and to balance inventory.
We post the manufacturer’s suggested retail price (“MSRP”) on every vehicle, as required by law. We
negotiate the final sales price of a new vehicle individually with the customer. We sell many of our higher
volume vehicles under our “Promo Price” program. This program markets vehicles at a more affordable
price that is significantly less than MSRP.
In 2006, we implemented several initiatives that we expect will improve our operations in future periods.
Such initiatives included the following:
• A Customer Centric Sales Process, which will help leverage the benefits of our Lithia Store
Management System (“LSMS”) which allows us to track advertising and increase the productivity
of the sales staff by providing daily work plans and focused training. Under this program,
showrooms will have interactive personal computers, which will allow the salesperson to quickly
and efficiently enter data and interact with the customer to speed up the sales process;
5
• A Finance and Insurance (“F&I”) Certification Program for our F&I managers;
•
• An Internet initiative, which involves developing a centralized department that will be staffed with
Improved functionality of our centralized inventory control and procurement process;
•
brand specialists capable of communicating with customers by phone or live chat;
IT initiatives related to automating our offices, centralizing certain office functions and establishing
independent used vehicle operations;
• An Assured Used Vehicle program and an independent used vehicle strategy. We began the
Assured Used Vehicle program in the Tri-Cities, Abilene and Reno markets during the second
quarter of 2006. We expect to have our first independent used vehicle outlet operating by late
summer of 2007; and
• Used Vehicle First Look Technology has been fully integrated across the entire network of stores.
We continue to train and optimize the usage of this technology in our stores. The First Look
Technology provides a Trade Analyzer, Inventory Management Center, Purchasing Center,
Redistribution Center and other functions that will help improve our used vehicle operations over
time.
Used Vehicle Sales
At each new vehicle store, we also sell used vehicles. Used vehicle sales are an important part of our
overall profitability. In 2006, retail used vehicle sales generated a gross profit margin of 14.9% compared
with a gross profit margin of 7.7% for new vehicle sales.
Since the beginning of 2002, the used vehicle market has been negatively impacted by strong
competition from the new vehicle market, with heavy manufacturer incentives in the form of cash rebates,
discounted pricing and low interest financing. This trend continued in 2006 and, with the focus on new
vehicle sales, same store used vehicle sales only increased by 0.6% in 2006 compared to 2005.
We implemented a number of procedures in the used vehicle business, which have lead to industry
leading used vehicle margins and that we expect will continue to generate positive results for this
important business line:
• We conduct our own local used vehicle auctions in select markets and manage the disposal of
used vehicles at larger auctions. The process is centralized and controlled at the management
level; and
• We are implementing an Assured Used Vehicle strategy (the “Assured Program”) in many of our
stores. The Assured Program sales process is about selling vehicles at a “low-haggle” price very
similar to our “Promo-pricing” strategy on new vehicles. The Assured Program also provides a 60-
day/3,000 mile “if it breaks, we fix it at no cost” limited warranty on all used vehicles. Each vehicle
receives a rigorous 160-point inspection, extensive detailing and reconditioning and a vehicle
history report. The Assured Program allows all customers to return the vehicle within 3 days or
500 miles of the purchase. The customer can exit the deal and receive their trade-in back, at no
cost to the customer and with no questions asked.
In addition, as a complement to our ongoing used vehicle operation at each store, we use specialists in
our support services group to increase the acquisition of used vehicles. We believe that this will help
bolster sales volumes in the 3 to 7 year old vehicle market.
6
Our used vehicle operations give us an opportunity to:
•
•
•
generate sales to customers financially unable or unwilling to purchase a new vehicle;
increase new and used vehicle sales by aggressively pursuing customer trade-ins; and
increase service contract sales and provide financing to used vehicle purchasers.
In 2006, we sold approximately 1.04 used vehicles (retail and wholesale combined) for every retail new
vehicle sold.
In addition to selling late model used cars, as do other new vehicle dealers, our stores emphasize sales
of used vehicles three to seven years old. These vehicles sell for lower prices, but normally generate
greater margins. We believe that selling a larger number of used vehicles makes us less susceptible to
the effects of changes in the volume of new vehicle sales that result from economic conditions.
We acquire most of our used vehicles through customer trade-ins, but we also buy them at “closed”
auctions, attended only by new vehicle automotive retailers with franchises for the brands offered. These
auctions offer off-lease, rental and fleet vehicles. We also buy used vehicles at “open” auctions of
repossessed vehicles and vehicles being sold by other automotive retailers.
In addition to selling used vehicles to retail customers, we wholesale to other automotive retailers and to
wholesalers used vehicles that are in poor condition and vehicles that have not sold promptly.
Our used vehicle sales from continuing operations were as follows:
Retail used vehicle units……………………….…
Retail used vehicle sales (in thousands)………..
Average selling price...........................................
2006
43,424
$707,378
$16,290
Year Ended December 31,
2004
40,312
$609,692
$15,124
2003
40,389
$589,262
$14,590
2005
42,831
$666,627
$15,564
2002
40,198
$586,753
$14,597
Wholesale used vehicle units ................... ……..
25,282
Wholesale used vehicle sales (in thousands)..… $155,019
$6,132
Average selling price………………………..…….
23,608
$138,821
$5,880
21,905
$116,852
$5,334
25,181
$119,159
$4,732
24,135
$119,590
$4,955
Total used vehicle units............................ …..…
68,706
Total used vehicle sales (in thousands)……...… $862,397
$12,552
Average selling price…………………………..….
66,439
$805,448
$12,123
62,217
$726,544
$11,678
65,570
$708,421
$10,804
64,333
$706,343
$10,979
Vehicle Financing, Extended Warranty and Insurance
We believe that arranging financing is critical to our ability to sell vehicles and related products and
services. We provide a variety of financing and leasing alternatives to meet customer needs. Offering
customer financing on a “same day” basis gives us an advantage, particularly over smaller competitors
who do not generate enough sales to attract our breadth of finance sources.
We try to arrange financing for every vehicle we sell. Our finance and insurance managers possess
extensive knowledge of available financing alternatives and receive training in determining each
customer’s financing needs so that the customer can purchase or lease a vehicle. The finance and
insurance managers work closely with financing sources to quickly determine a customer’s credit status
and to confirm the type and amount of financing available to each customer.
In 2006, we provided financing or other insurance products for 77% of our new vehicle sales and 76% of
our retail used vehicle sales. Our average finance and insurance revenue per retail vehicle totaled $1,094
in 2006.
We earn a portion of the financing charge by discounting each finance contract we write and
subsequently sell to a lender. We normally arrange financing for customers by selling the contracts to
7
outside sources on a non-recourse basis to avoid the risk of default. During 2006, we did not directly
finance any of our vehicle sales.
Our finance and insurance managers also market third-party extended warranty contracts and insurance
contracts to our new and used vehicle buyers. These products and services yield higher profit margins
than vehicle sales and contribute significantly to our profitability. Extended warranty contracts provide
additional coverage for new vehicles beyond the duration or scope of the manufacturer’s warranty. The
service contracts we sell to used vehicle buyers provide coverage for certain major repairs.
We also offer our customers third party credit life and health and accident insurance when they finance an
automobile purchase. We receive a commission on each policy sold. We also offer other products, such
as protective coatings and automobile alarms.
Service, Body and Parts
Our automotive service, body and parts operations are an integral part of establishing customer loyalty
and contribute significantly to our overall revenue and profits. We provide parts and service primarily for
the new vehicle brands sold by our stores, but we also service other vehicles. In 2006, our service, body
and parts operations generated $343.7 million in revenues, or 10.8% of total revenues. We set prices to
reflect the difficulty of the types of repair and the cost and availability of parts. Our focus on service
advisor training in past couple of years, as well as a number of pricing and cost saving initiatives across
the entire service and parts business lines, led to improvements in same-store service, body and parts
sales in 2006 compared to 2005, as well as improvements in gross profit margins achieved.
The service, body and parts business provides important repeat revenues to the stores. We market our
parts and service products by notifying the owners of vehicles when their vehicles are due for periodic
service. This encourages preventive maintenance rather than post-breakdown repairs. We offer a lifetime
oil and filter service, which, in 2006, was purchased by 39% of our new and used vehicle buyers. This
service helps us retain customers, and provides opportunities for repeat parts and service business.
Revenues from the service, body and parts departments are particularly important during economic
downturns as owners tend to repair their existing used vehicles rather than buy new vehicles during such
periods. This limits the effects of a drop in new vehicle sales that may occur in a prolonged slow
economic environment.
We operate nineteen collision repair centers: four in Texas, three in Oregon and two each in Idaho and
Alaska and one each in Washington, Montana, Colorado, Nevada, South Dakota, Nebraska, Wisconsin
and Iowa.
Marketing
We market ourselves as “America’s Car & Truck Store” and as “Driving America.” We use most types of
advertising, including television, newspaper, radio, direct mail, and an Internet web site. Advertising
expense, net of manufacturer credits, was $20.7 million during 2006, with 30% of the total amount used
for print media, 22% for television, 16% for radio, 9% for Internet and 23% for direct mail and other
sources. We advertise to develop our image as a reputable automotive retailer, offering quality service,
affordable automobiles and financing for all qualified buyers. The automobile manufacturers pay for some
of our advertising and marketing expenditures. The manufacturers also provide us with market research,
which assists us in developing our own advertising and marketing campaigns. In addition, our stores
advertise special discounts or other targeted promotions to attract customers. By owning a cluster of
stores in a particular market, we save money from volume discounts and other media concessions. We
also participate as a member of advertising cooperatives and associations, whose members pool their
resources and expertise with manufacturers to develop advertising campaigns.
8
We maintain a web site (www.lithia.com) that generates leads and provides information for our
customers. We use the Internet site as a marketing tool to familiarize customers with us, our stores and
the products we sell, rather than to complete purchases. Although many customers use the Internet to
research information about new vehicles, nearly all ultimately visit a store to complete the sale and take
delivery of the vehicle. Our web site enables a customer to:
•
•
•
•
•
•
locate our stores and identify the new vehicle brands sold at each store;
view new and used vehicle inventory;
schedule service appointments;
view Kelley Blue Book values;
visit our investor relations site; and
view employment opportunities.
We emphasize customer satisfaction and strive to develop a reputation for quality and fairness. We train
our sales personnel to identify an appropriate vehicle for each of our customers at an affordable price.
Management Information System
We consolidate, process and maintain financial information, operational and accounting data, and other
related statistical information on centralized computers. We have a fully operational intranet with each
store directly connected to headquarters. Our systems are based on an ADP platform for the main
database, and information is processed and analyzed utilizing customized financial reporting software
from Hyperion Solutions. Senior management can access detailed information from all of our locations
regarding:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
inventory;
cash balances;
total unit sales and mix of new and used vehicle sales;
lease and finance transactions;
sales of ancillary products and services;
key cost items and profit margins; and
the relative performance of the stores.
Each store’s general manager has access to this same information. With this information, we can quickly
analyze the results of operations, identify trends and focus on areas that require attention or
improvement. Our management information system also allows our general managers to respond quickly
to changes in consumer preferences and purchasing patterns, maximizing our inventory turnover.
Our management information system is particularly important to successfully operating new stores.
Following each acquisition, we immediately install our management information system at each location.
This quickly makes financial, accounting and other operational data easily available throughout the
company. With this information, we can more efficiently execute our operating strategy at each new store.
Franchise Agreements
Each of our store subsidiaries signs a franchise (or dealer sales and service) agreement with each
manufacturer of the new vehicles it sells.
The typical automobile franchise agreement specifies the locations within a designated market area at
which the store may sell vehicles and related products and perform certain approved services. The
designation of such areas and the allocation of new vehicles among stores are at the discretion of the
manufacturer. Franchise agreements do not guarantee exclusivity within a specified territory, but do have
some protection under state laws.
A franchise agreement may impose requirements on the store with respect to:
9
•
•
the showroom;
service facilities and equipment;
inventories of vehicles and parts;
•
• minimum working capital;
training of personnel; and
•
performance standards for sales volume and customer satisfaction.
•
Each manufacturer closely monitors compliance with these requirements and requires each store to
submit monthly and annual financial statements. Franchise agreements also grant a store the right to use
and display manufacturers’ trademarks, service marks and designs in the manner approved by each
manufacturer.
Most franchise agreements are generally renewed after one to five years, and, in practice, have indefinite
lives. Some franchise agreements, including those with DaimlerChrysler, have no termination date.
Historically, all of our agreements have been renewed and we expect that manufacturers will continue to
renew them in the future. In addition, state franchise laws limit the ability of manufacturers to terminate or
fail to renew automotive franchises. Each franchise agreement authorizes at least one person to manage
the store’s operations.
The typical franchise agreement provides for early termination or non-renewal by the manufacturer upon:
•
•
•
a change of management or ownership without manufacturer consent;
insolvency or bankruptcy of the dealer;
death or incapacity of the dealer/manager;
conviction of a dealer/manager or owner of certain crimes;
•
• misrepresentation of certain information by the store, dealer/manager or owner to the
manufacturer;
failure to adequately operate the store;
failure to maintain any license, permit or authorization required for the conduct of business; or
poor sales performance or low customer satisfaction index scores.
•
•
•
We sign master framework agreements with most manufacturers that impose additional requirements on
our stores. See Item 1A. “Risk Factors” for further details.
Competition
The retail automotive business is highly competitive, consisting of a large number of independent
operators, many of whom are individuals, families and small retail groups. We compete primarily with
other automotive retailers, both publicly and privately-held, near our store locations. In addition, regional
and national car rental companies operate retail used car lots to dispose of their used rental cars.
Vehicle manufacturers have designated specific marketing and sales areas within which only one dealer
of a vehicle brand may operate. In addition, our franchise agreements typically limit our ability to acquire
multiple dealerships of a given brand within a particular market area. Certain state franchise laws also
restrict us from relocating our dealerships or establishing new dealerships of a particular brand within any
area that is served by another dealer with the same brand. Accordingly, to the extent that a market has
multiple dealers of a particular brand, as many of our key markets do, we are subject to significant intra-
brand competition.
We are larger and have more financial resources than most private automotive retailers with which we
currently compete in most of our regional markets. We compete directly with retailers like ourselves in our
metropolitan markets like Denver, Colorado, Seattle, Washington and Concord, California. If we enter
other metropolitan markets, we may face competitors that are larger or have access to greater financial
resources. We do not have any cost advantage in purchasing new vehicles from manufacturers. We rely
10
on advertising and merchandising, sales expertise, service reputation and location of our stores to sell
new vehicles.
In addition to competition for the sale of vehicles, we expect increased competition for the acquisition of
other stores. With respect to each brand of vehicles we market, we have faced only limited competition
with respect to our acquisitions to date, primarily from privately-held automotive retailers. Other publicly-
owned automotive retailers with significant capital resources may enter our current and targeted market
areas in the future.
Regulation
Our business is subject to extensive regulation, supervision and licensing under federal, state and local
laws, ordinances and regulations. State and federal regulatory agencies, such as the Department of
Motor Vehicles, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the EEOC (Equal Employment
Opportunity Commission) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, have jurisdiction over the
operation of our stores, service centers, collision repair shops and other operations. They regulate
matters such as consumer protection, employment practices, workers’ safety and air and water quality.
Laws also protect franchised automotive retailers from the unequal bargaining power held by the
manufacturers. Under those laws, a manufacturer may not:
•
•
terminate or fail to renew a franchise without good cause; or
prevent any reasonable changes in the capital structure or financing of a store.
Manufacturers may object to a sale of a store or change of management based on character, financial
ability or business experience of the proposed new operator.
Automotive retailers and manufacturers are also subject to laws to protect consumers, including so-called
“Lemon Laws.” Most “Lemon Laws” require a manufacturer to replace a new vehicle or accept it for a full
refund within a set time period after initial purchase if:
•
•
the vehicle does not conform to the manufacturer’s express warranties; and
the automotive retailer or manufacturer, after a reasonable number of attempts, is unable to
correct or repair a defect.
We must provide written disclosures on new vehicles of mileage and pricing information. Financing and
insurance activities are subject to credit reporting, debt collection, truth-in-lending and insurance industry
regulation.
Our business, particularly parts, service and collision repair operations, involves hazardous or toxic
substances or wastes, such as motor oil, waste motor oil and filters, transmission fluid, antifreeze, Freon,
waste paint and lacquer thinner, batteries, solvents, lubricants, degreasing agents, gasoline and diesel
fuels. Federal, state and local authorities establishing health and environmental quality standards regulate
the handling, storage, treatment, recycling and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes and
remediation of contaminated sites, both at our facilities and at sites to which we send hazardous or toxic
substances or wastes for treatment, recycling or disposal. We are aware of limited contamination at
certain of our current and former facilities, and we are in the process of conducting investigations and/or
remediation at some of these properties. Based on our current information, any costs or liabilities relating
to such contamination, other environmental matters or compliance with environmental regulations are not
expected to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. There can
be no assurances, however, that (i) additional environmental matters will not arise or that new conditions
or facts will not develop in the future at our current or formerly owned or operated facilities, or at sites that
we may acquire in the future, or that (ii) these matters, conditions or facts will not result in a material
adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
11
Employees
As of December 31, 2006, we employed approximately 6,261 persons on a full-time equivalent basis. We
believe we have good relationships with our employees.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the risks described below before making an investment decision. The risks
described below are not the only ones facing our company. Additional risks not presently known to us or
that we currently deem immaterial may also impair our business operations.
Our ability to increase revenues through our acquisition growth strategy depends on our ability to
acquire and successfully integrate additional stores.
General. The U.S. automobile industry is considered a mature industry in which minimal growth is
expected in unit sales of new vehicles. Accordingly, a principal component of our growth in sales is to
make additional acquisitions in our existing markets and in new geographic markets. To complete the
acquisitions of additional stores, we need to successfully address each of the following challenges.
Limitations on our capital
from capitalizing on acquisition
opportunities. Acquisitions of additional stores will require substantial capital investment. Limitations on
our capital resources would restrict our ability to complete new acquisitions. Further, the use of any
financing source could have the effect of reducing our earnings per share.
resources may prevent us
We have financed our past acquisitions from a combination of the cash flow from our operations,
borrowings under our credit arrangements, issuances of our common stock and proceeds from our
private debt offering. We expect cash on hand together with our other financing resources to be sufficient
for our currently anticipated acquisition program through 2008. If we are unable to obtain financing on
acceptable terms, we may be required to slow the pace of our acquisition plans, which may materially and
adversely affect our acquisition growth strategy.
Generally, we use cash and available credit facilities for acquisitions. However, on occasion, we have
financed acquisitions by issuing shares of our common stock as partial consideration for acquired stores.
The viability of using common stock for acquisitions will depend on our willingness to issue shares, the
market price of our common stock and the willingness of potential acquisition candidates to accept our
common stock as part of the consideration for the sale of their businesses. Accordingly, our ability to
make acquisitions could be adversely affected if the price of our common stock declines or, alternatively,
is perceived as fully valued. If potential acquisition candidates are unwilling to accept our common stock
as partial consideration, we will be forced to rely solely on available cash from operations or debt
financing, which could limit our acquisition and expansion plans.
Manufacturers may restrict our ability to make new acquisitions. We are required to obtain consent from
the applicable manufacturer prior to the acquisition of a franchised store. In determining whether to
approve an acquisition, a manufacturer considers many factors, including our financial condition,
ownership structure, the number of stores currently owned and our performance with those stores. Most
major manufacturers have now established limitations or guidelines on the:
•
•
•
•
•
•
number of such manufacturers’ stores that may be acquired by a single owner;
number of stores that may be acquired in any market or region;
percentage of total sales that may be controlled by one automotive retailer group;
ownership of stores in contiguous markets;
frequency of acquisitions; and
requirement that no other manufacturers’ brands be sold from the same store location. In
addition, each manufacturer has site control agreements in place that limit our ability to change
the use of the facility without their approval.
12
DaimlerChrysler has issued a policy statement to all of its dealers stating that it may disapprove any
acquisition if the buyer would own stores representing more than (i) 10% of any Business Center’s Annual
Planning Potential; (ii) 5% of the Annual Planning Potential of the United States; or (iii) 20% of a Metro
Market’s Annual Planning Potential. While we have reached these limits in certain local markets, there
are many other markets available to us. There are approximately 4,300 Chrysler stores nationwide.
General Motors currently evaluates our acquisitions of GM stores on a case-by-case basis. GM, however,
limits the maximum number of GM stores that we may acquire at any time to 50% of the GM stores, by
franchise line, in a GM-defined geographic market area. GM has approximately 7,300 stores nationwide.
Ford currently limits the number of stores that we may own to the greater of (i) 15 Ford and 15 Lincoln
Mercury stores and (ii) that number of Ford and Lincoln Mercury stores accounting for 5% of the
preceding year’s total Ford, Lincoln and Mercury retail sales in the United States. In addition, Ford limits
us to one Ford store in a Ford-defined market area having two or fewer authorized Ford stores and one-
third of Ford stores in any Ford-defined market area having three or more authorized Ford stores. Ford
has approximately 4,600 franchised stores nationwide.
Toyota restricts the number of stores that we may own and the time frame over which we may acquire
them, and imposes specific performance criteria on existing stores as a condition to any future
acquisitions. In 2006, we entered into a framework agreement with Toyota to permit us to acquire
additional stores nationwide if our performance at existing stores satisfies the minimum criteria. The
maximum number of stores may not exceed 5% of Toyota’s aggregate national annual retail sale volume.
In addition, Toyota restricts the number of Toyota stores that we may acquire in any Toyota-defined
region and Metro market, as well as any contiguous market. Toyota has approximately 1,200 stores
nationwide.
With respect to other manufacturers, we do not believe existing numerical limitations will materially restrict
our acquisition program for many years.
A manufacturer also considers our past performance as measured by their customer satisfaction index, or
CSI, scores and sales performance at our existing stores. At any point in time, some of our stores may
have CSI scores below the manufacturers’ sales zone averages or have achieved sales performances
below the targets manufacturers have set. Our failure to maintain satisfactory CSI scores and to achieve
sales performance goals could restrict our ability to complete future acquisitions. We currently have, and
at any point in the future may have, manufacturers that restrict our ability to complete future acquisitions.
We may be unable to improve profitability of newly acquired stores. Many of the stores we acquire have
pretax margins below our historical pretax margin. Our ability to improve the profitability of newly acquired
stores depends in large part on our ability at such stores to:
•
•
•
•
•
increase new vehicle sales;
improve sales of higher margin used vehicles and finance and insurance products;
train and motivate store management;
achieve cost savings and realize revenue enhancing opportunities; and
improve inventory, accounts receivable and other controls.
If we fail to maintain or improve the profitability of newly acquired stores, we may be unable to maintain
our historical pretax margin. Further, failure to improve the performance of under-performing stores could
preclude us from receiving manufacturer approval for any new acquisitions of that brand.
Competition with other automotive retailers for attractive acquisition targets could restrict our ability to
complete new acquisitions. In the current economic environment, we are presented with an increasing
number of attractive acquisition opportunities. However, we compete with several other public and private
national automotive retailers, some of which have greater financial and managerial resources.
Competition with existing automotive retailers and those formed in the future may result in fewer attractive
13
acquisition opportunities and increased acquisition costs. If we cannot negotiate acquisitions on
acceptable terms, our future revenue growth will be significantly limited.
The loss of key personnel or the failure to attract additional qualified management personnel
could adversely affect our operations and growth.
Our success depends to a significant degree on the efforts and abilities of our senior management,
particularly Sidney B. DeBoer, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Bryan B. DeBoer, our President
and Chief Operating Officer, M. L. Dick Heimann, our Vice Chairman, R. Bradford Gray, Executive Vice
President and Don Jones, Jr., our Senior Vice President, Retail Operations. Further, we have identified
Mr. Sidney B. DeBoer, Mr. Heimann and/or Mr. Bryan B. DeBoer in most of our store franchise
agreements as the individuals who control the franchises and upon whose financial resources and
management expertise the manufacturers may rely when awarding or approving the transfer of any
franchise. The loss of any of these individuals could have a material adverse effect on our on-going
relationship with the manufacturers.
We place substantial responsibility on our general managers for the profitability of their stores. We have
increased our number of stores from 5 in 1996 to 108 as of March 6, 2007. Many stores are offered for
sale to us to enable the owner/manager to retire. These potential acquisitions are viable to us only if we
are able to obtain replacement management. This has resulted in the need to hire many additional
managers. As we continue to expand, the need for additional experienced managers will become even
more critical. The market for qualified general managers is highly competitive. The loss of the services of
key management personnel or the inability to attract additional qualified general managers could have a
material adverse effect on our business and the execution of our acquisition growth strategy.
Our stores depend on vehicle sales and, therefore, our success depends in large part upon the
overall demand for the particular lines of vehicles that each of our stores sell and the ability of the
manufacturers to continue to deliver such vehicles.
Our DaimlerChrysler, GM, Ford and Toyota stores represent over three-fourths of our total new vehicle
retail sales. Chrysler alone accounted for over half of those sales. Demand for our primary manufacturers’
vehicles as well as the financial condition, management, marketing, production and distribution
capabilities of these manufacturers can significantly affect our business. Events that adversely affect a
manufacturer’s ability to timely deliver new vehicles, such as labor disputes and other production
disruptions, including delays that sometimes occur during periods of new product introductions, may
adversely affect us by reducing our supply of popular new vehicles and leading to lower sales in our
stores during those periods than would otherwise occur. Further, any event that causes adverse publicity
involving any of our manufacturers or their vehicles could reduce sales of those vehicles and adversely
affect our sales and profits.
Certain manufacturers, including DaimlerChrysler, GM and Ford, have incurred substantial operating
losses in recent periods that could jeopardize their ability to develop new competitive models. Further,
DaimlerChrysler has announced that management is considering the sale or spin-off of its U.S. Dodge
Chrysler Jeep operations. Moreover, if the financial conditions of the domestic manufacturers do not
improve, they may be forced to seek protection from creditors in bankruptcy. Any reorganization or
restructuring might result in an elimination of certain makes or models, a disruption in vehicle deliveries, a
delay in the introduction of new models, the elimination of certain dealership locations or a combination of
these consequences. Without a successful reorganization, continued sustained losses could result in the
cessation of operations. The bankruptcy, substantial downsizing or restructuring of one of our major
manufacturing partners would likely have a material adverse affect on our results of operations.
14
Cyclical downturns in the automobile industry that reduce our vehicle sales may adversely affect
our profitability.
The automobile industry is cyclical and historically has experienced downturns characterized by
oversupply and weak demand. Many factors affect the industry, including general economic conditions,
consumer confidence, personal discretionary spending levels, interest rates and credit availability. We
cannot guarantee that the industry will not experience sustained periods of decline in vehicle sales in the
future. Any such decline could have an adverse effect on our business.
The automobile industry also experiences seasonal variations in revenue. Demand for automobiles is
generally lower during the winter months than in other seasons, particularly in our market areas that
experience harsh winters. Accordingly, we expect revenues and operating results generally to be lower in
our first and fourth quarters than in our second and third quarters for existing stores.
Hostilities in the Middle East or other factors that significantly increase gasoline prices can be
expected to reduce vehicle sales.
Historically, in times of rapid increase in crude oil and gasoline prices, sales of vehicles have dropped,
particularly in the short term, as consumer confidence wanes and fuel costs become more prominent to
the consumer’s buying decision. In sustained periods of higher fuel costs, consumers who do purchase
vehicles tend to prefer smaller, more fuel efficient vehicles or hybrid powered vehicles currently in limited
supply.
The majority of our new vehicle sales are of domestic manufacture and are predominately SUVs and light
trucks. These vehicles generally provide us with higher gross profit margins. A significant drop in sales
volume in these vehicles, which was experienced in 2006, would adversely affect our level of profits.
The ability of our stores to make new vehicle sales depends in large part upon the manufacturers
and, therefore, any disruption or change in our relationships with manufacturers may materially
and adversely affect our profitability.
We depend on the manufacturers to provide us with a desirable mix of new vehicles. The most popular
vehicles usually produce the highest profit margins and are frequently in short supply. If we cannot obtain
sufficient quantities of the most popular models, our profitability may be adversely affected. Sales of less
desirable models may reduce our profit margins.
We depend on the manufacturers for sales incentives and other programs that are intended to promote
sales or support our profitability. Manufacturers historically have made many changes to their incentive
programs during each year. A discontinuation or change in manufacturers’ incentive programs could
adversely affect our business. Moreover, some manufacturers use a store’s CSI scores as a factor for
participating in incentive programs. Accordingly, our failure to meet CSI standards at our stores could
have a material adverse effect on us.
Each of our stores operates pursuant to a franchise agreement with each of the respective manufacturers
for which it serves as franchisee. Manufacturers exert significant control over our stores through the terms
and conditions of their franchise agreements, including provisions for termination or non-renewal for a
variety of causes. From time-to-time, certain of our stores have failed to comply with certain provisions of
their franchise agreements. These agreements and state law, however, generally afford us the
opportunity to cure violations and no manufacturer has terminated or failed to renew any franchise
agreement with us. If a manufacturer terminates or fails to renew one or more of our significant franchise
agreements, such action could have a material adverse effect on us.
Our franchise agreements also specify that, in certain situations, we cannot operate a franchise by
another manufacturer in the same building as the manufacturer’s franchised store. This may require us to
build new facilities at a significant cost. In addition, some manufacturers are in the process of realigning
15
their stores along defined channels, such as combining Chrysler and Jeep in one location. As a result,
manufacturers may require us to move or sell certain stores. Moreover, our manufacturers generally
require that the store meet defined image standards. All of these commitments could require us to make
significant capital expenditures.
Some of our franchise agreements prohibit transfers of ownership interests of a store or, in some cases,
its parent. The most prohibitive restriction, which has been imposed by various manufacturers, provides
that, under certain circumstances, we may lose a franchise if a person or entity acquires an ownership
interest in us above a specified level (ranging from 20% to 50% depending on the particular
manufacturer’s restrictions and falling as low as 5% if another vehicle manufacturer is the entity acquiring
the ownership interest) without the approval of the applicable manufacturer. Violations by our
stockholders or prospective stockholders are generally outside of our control and may result in the
termination or non-renewal of one or more of our franchises, which may have a material adverse effect on
us.
We are developing a stand-alone used vehicle store model whose profitability is unproven.
We are incurring significant costs to develop software, processes and marketing strategies to open and
successfully operate stand-alone used vehicle stores. To this end, we have hired a team of employees
committed to this effort, purchased a number of sites, designed facilities and are commencing
construction. The start-up costs are significant and will reduce earnings until these stores become
profitable.
The business model is new to us and involves developing and successfully implementing a sales process
and strategy different from that currently used in our new vehicle stores. Further, there will be many
competitors in the markets our stores will be in, including, in some markets, national used vehicle store
chains with name familiarity and proven business models. If our efforts are not as successful as we
anticipate, our financial results could be reduced.
With the breadth of our operations and volume of transactions, compliance with the many federal
and state consumer protection and motor vehicle laws cannot be assured. Fines and
administration sanctions can be severe.
We are subject to numerous consumer protection and department of motor vehicles laws in each of the
15 states in which we have stores, as well as federal consumer protection laws. With the number of
stores we operate, the number of personnel we employ and the large volume of transactions we handle, it
is likely that technical mistakes will be made. If there are unauthorized activities of serious magnitude, the
state and federal authorities have the power to impose civil monetary penalties and sanctions, suspend or
withdraw dealer licenses or take other actions that could materially impair our activities or our ability to
acquire new stores in those states where violations occurred.
Import product restrictions and foreign trade risks may impair our ability to sell foreign vehicles
profitably.
Certain vehicles we sell, as well as certain major components of vehicles we sell, are manufactured
outside the United States. Accordingly, we are affected by import and export restrictions of various
jurisdictions and are dependent to some extent on general economic conditions in, and political relations
with, a number of foreign countries. Additionally, fluctuations in currency exchange rates may increase
the price and adversely affect our sales of vehicles produced by foreign manufacturers. Imports into the
United States may also be adversely affected by increased transportation costs and tariffs, quotas or
duties, any of which could have a material adverse effect on us.
16
Environmental, health or safety regulations could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations or financial condition or cause us to incur significant expenditures.
We are subject to various federal, state and local environmental, health and safety regulations governing,
among other things, the generation, storage, handling, use, treatment, recycling, transportation, disposal
and remediation of hazardous material and the emission and discharge of hazardous material into the
environment. Under certain environmental regulations, we could be held responsible for all of the costs
relating to any contamination at our present or our predecessors’ past facilities and at third party waste
disposal sites. We are aware of contamination at certain of our facilities, and we are in the process of
conducting investigations and/or remediation at some of these properties. In certain cases, the current or
prior property owner is conducting the investigation and/or remediation or we have been indemnified by
either the current or prior property owner for such contamination. There can be no assurances that these
owners will remediate or continue to remediate these properties or pay or continue to pay pursuant to
these indemnities. We are also required to obtain permits from governmental authorities for certain
operations. If we violate or fail to fully comply with these regulations or permits, we could be fined or
otherwise sanctioned by regulators.
Environmental, health and safety regulations are becoming increasingly more stringent. There can be no
assurances that the costs of compliance with these regulations will not result in a material adverse effect
on our results of operations or financial condition or that additional environmental, health or safety matters
will not arise or new conditions or facts will not develop in the future at our currently or formerly owned or
operated facilities, or at sites that we may acquire in the future, which will require us to incur significant
expenditures.
The sole voting control of our company is held by Sidney B. DeBoer who may have interests
different from your interests.
Lithia Holding Company, LLC, of which Sidney B. DeBoer, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, is
the sole managing member, holds all of the outstanding shares of our Class B common stock. A holder of
Class B common stock is entitled to ten votes for each share held, while a holder of Class A common
stock is entitled to one vote per share held. On most matters, the Class A and Class B common stock
vote together as a single class. As of March 6, 2007, Lithia Holding controlled approximately 70% of the
aggregate number of votes eligible to be cast by stockholders for the election of directors and most other
stockholder actions. Therefore, Lithia Holding will control the election of our Board of Directors and will be
in a position to control the policies and operations of the company. In addition, because Mr. DeBoer is the
managing member of Lithia Holding, he currently controls and will continue to control, all of the
outstanding Class B common stock, thereby allowing him to control the company. So long as at least 16
2/3% of the total number of shares outstanding are shares of Class B common stock, the holders of
Class B common stock will be able to control all matters requiring approval of 66 2/3% or less of the
aggregate number of votes. Absent a significant increase in the number of shares of Class A common
stock outstanding or conversion of Class B common stock into Class A common stock, the holders of
shares of Class B common stock will be entitled to elect all members of the Board of Directors and control
all matters subject to stockholder approval that do not require a class vote.
17
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
Item 2. Properties
Our stores and other facilities consist primarily of automobile showrooms, display lots, service facilities,
nineteen collision repair and paint shops, supply facilities, automobile storage lots, parking lots and
offices. We believe our facilities are currently adequate for our needs and are in good repair. We own
some of our properties, but also lease many properties, providing future flexibility to relocate our retail
stores as demographics change. Most leases give us the option to renew the lease for one or more lease
extension periods. We also hold some undeveloped land for future expansion.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
We are party to numerous legal proceedings arising in the normal course of our business. While we
cannot predict with certainty the outcomes of these matters, we do not anticipate that the resolution of
these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial
condition or cash flows.
On November 25, 2003, Aimee Phillips filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon
(Case No. 03-3109-HO) against Lithia Motors, Inc. and two of its wholly-owned subsidiaries alleging
violations of state and federal RICO laws, the Oregon Unfair Trade Practices Act (“UTPA”) and common
law fraud. Ms. Phillips seeks damages, attorney’s fees and injunctive relief. Ms. Phillips’ complaint stems
from her purchase of a Toyota Tacoma pick-up truck on July 6, 2002. On May 14, 2004, we filed an
answer to Ms. Phillips’ Complaint. This case was consolidated with the Allen case described below and
has a similar current procedural status.
On April 28, 2004, Robert Allen and 29 other plaintiffs (“Allen Plaintiffs”) filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District
Court for the District of Oregon (Case No. 04-3032-HO) against Lithia Motors, Inc. and three of its wholly-
owned subsidiaries alleging violations of state and federal RICO laws, the Oregon UTPA and common
law fraud. The Allen Plaintiffs seek damages, attorney’s fees and injunctive relief. The Allen Plaintiffs’
Complaint stems from vehicle purchases made at Lithia dealerships between July 2000 and April 2001.
On August 27, 2004, we filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint. On May 26, 2005, the Court entered an
Order granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss plaintiffs’ state and federal RICO claims with prejudice.
The Court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ UTPA and fraud claims. Plaintiffs
filed a Motion to Reconsider the dismissal Order. On August 23, 2005, the Court granted Plaintiffs’ Motion
for Reconsideration and permitted the filing of a Second Amended Complaint (“SAC”). On September 21,
2005, the Allen Plaintiffs, along with Ms. Phillips, filed the SAC. In this complaint, the Allen plaintiffs seek
actual damages that total less than $500,000, trebled, approximately $3.0 million in mental distress
claims, trebled, punitive damages of $15.0 million, attorney’s fees and injunctive relief. The SAC added as
defendants certain officers and employees of Lithia. In addition, the SAC added a claim for relief based
on the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”). On November 14, 2005 we filed a second Motion to Dismiss the
Complaint and a Motion to Compel Arbitration. On April 27, 2006, the court granted our motion to dismiss
a number of the claims but permitted others to proceed. In particular, all TILA claims were dismissed,
some of the RICO claims have been eliminated and any claims for non-economic damages for the
alleged fraud have been dismissed. We believe the actions of the court have significantly narrowed the
claims and potential damages sought by the plaintiffs. Lithia’s motion to Compel Arbitration on Plaintiffs’
remaining claims is still pending.
On September 23, 2005, Maria Anabel Aripe and 19 other plaintiffs (“Aripe Plaintiffs”) filed a lawsuit in the
U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon (Case No. 05-3083-HO) against Lithia Motors, Inc., 12 of its
wholly-owned subsidiaries and certain officers and employees of Lithia, alleging violations of state and
federal RICO laws, the Oregon UTPA, common law fraud and TILA. The Aripe Plaintiffs seek actual
damages of less than $600,000, trebled, approximately $3.7 million in mental distress claims, trebled,
18
punitive damages of $12.6 million, attorney’s fees and injunctive relief. The Aripe Plaintiffs’ Complaint
stems from vehicle purchases made at Lithia dealerships between May 2001 and August 2005 and is
substantially similar to the allegations made in the Allen case. We expect certain of the rulings in the Allen
case to apply equally to this case and proceedings in this matter are awaiting rulings in the Allen case.
Once resolved, we further expect to file motions directed at all claims.
On May 30, 2006 four of our wholly owned subsidiaries located in Alaska were served with a lawsuit
alleging that the dealerships failed to comply with Alaska law relating to various disclosures required to be
made during the sale of a used vehicle. The complaint was filed by Jackie Lee Neese et al v. Lithia
Chrysler Jeep of Anchorage, Inc. et al in the Superior Court for the State of Alaska at Anchorage, case
number 3AN-06-04815CI. The complainants seek to represent other similarly situated customers. The
court has not certified the suit as a class action.
We intend to vigorously defend all of the above matters and management believes that the likelihood of a
judgment for the amount of damages sought in any of the cases is remote.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of our shareholders during the quarter ended December 31, 2006.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
Stock Prices and Dividends
Our Class A common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol LAD. The following
table presents the high and low sale prices for our Class A common stock, as reported on the New York
Stock Exchange Composite Tape for each of the quarters in 2005 and 2006:
2005
Quarter 1
Quarter 2
Quarter 3
Quarter 4
2006
Quarter 1
Quarter 2
Quarter 3
Quarter 4
$
$
High
29.95
29.25
31.43
32.04
36.80
36.01
30.59
29.58
$
$
Low
24.99
23.60
28.29
25.10
29.32
28.50
23.33
21.75
The number of shareholders of record and approximate number of beneficial holders of Class A common
stock at March 6, 2007 was 1,383 and 3,300, respectively. All shares of Lithia’s Class B common stock
are held by Lithia Holding Company LLC.
19
Dividends declared and paid on our Class A and Class B common stock during 2005 and 2006 were as
follows:
Quarter related to:
2004
Fourth quarter
2005
First quarter
Second quarter
Third quarter
Fourth quarter
2006
First quarter
Second quarter
Third quarter
Dividend
amount per
share
Total amount of
dividend (in
thousands)
$0.08
$1,528
0.08
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.14
0.14
1,536
2,312
2,322
2,338
2,354
2,754
2,738
We currently intend to continue paying quarterly dividends similar to those paid in the second half of
2006. In January 2007, the Board of Directors approved a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share with
respect to the fourth quarter of 2006. The payment of any dividends is subject to the discretion of our
Board of Directors. In addition, our $225 million working capital, acquisition and used vehicle flooring
credit facility with U.S. Bank National Association, DaimlerChrysler Financial Services Americas LLC and
Toyota Motor Credit Corporation limits our cash dividends to $15 million per fiscal year and limits our
repurchases of our common stock to $20 million per fiscal year. Dividends paid in 2006 totaled $10.2
million and stock repurchased in 2006 totaled $4.7 million.
Repurchases of Class A Common Stock
We repurchased the following shares of our Class A common stock during the fourth quarter of 2006:
October 1 to October 31
November 1 to November 30
December 1 to December 31
Total
Total number
of shares
purchased
113,600
-
-
113,600
Average
price paid
per share
$23.92
-
-
23.92
Total number of
shares purchased
as part of publicly
announced plan
256,831
-
-
256,831
Maximum number
of shares that may
yet be purchased
under the plan
743,169
-
-
743,169
The publicly announced plan to repurchase up to a total of 1.0 million shares of our Class A common
stock was approved by our Board of Directors in June 2000 and renewed in August 2005 and does not
have an expiration date.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
Information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans is included in
Item 12.
20
Stock Performance Graph
The following line-graph shows the annual percentage change in the cumulative total returns for the past
five years on an assumed $100 initial investment and reinvestment of dividends, on (a) Lithia Motors,
Inc.’s Class A common stock; (b) the Russell 2000; and (c) a peer group index composed of United Auto
Group, Inc., Auto Nation, Sonic Automotive, Inc., Group 1 Automotive, Inc. and Asbury Automotive
Group, the only other comparable publicly traded automobile dealerships in the United States as of
December 31, 2006. The peer group index utilizes the same methods of presentation and assumptions for
the total return calculation as does Lithia Motors and the Russell 2000. All companies in the peer group
index are weighted in accordance with their market capitalizations.
200
180
160
140
120
100
80
$
60
Dec-01
Dec-02
Dec-03
Dec-04
Dec-05
Dec-06
Lithia Motors, Inc.
Auto Peer Group
Russell 2000 Index
Company/Index
Lithia Motors, Inc.
Auto Peer Group
Russell 2000
Base
Period
12/31/01
$100.00
100.00
100.00
12/31/02
$75.80
84.97
79.52
Indexed Returns for the Year Ended
12/31/05
12/31/04
$156.91
$131.96
154.42
137.07
144.86
138.55
12/31/03
$122.51
136.82
117.09
12/31/06
$146.10
177.49
171.47
21
Item 6. Selected Financial Data
You should read the Selected Financial Data in conjunction with Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” our Consolidated Financial Statements and
Notes thereto and other financial information contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
Revenues:
New vehicle
Used vehicle
Finance and insurance
Service, body and parts
Fleet and other
Total revenues
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Selling, general and administrative(1)
Depreciation and amortization
Income from operations
Floorplan interest expense(2)
Other interest expense
Other income, net
Income from continuing operations before
income taxes
Income taxes
Income from continuing operations
Income (loss) from discontinued operations,
net of tax
Net income
Basic income per share from continuing
operations
Basic income (loss) per share from discontinued
operations
Basic net income per share
Shares used in basic per share
Diluted income per share from continuing
operations
Diluted income (loss) per share from
discontinued operations
Diluted net income per share
Shares used in diluted per share
Cash dividends declared per common share
(In thousands)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Working capital
Inventories
Total assets
Flooring notes payable
Current maturities of long-term debt
Long-term debt, less current maturities
Total stockholders’ equity
2006
Year Ended December 31, (1)
2004
2005
2003
2002
$ 1,841,463 $ 1,631,316 $ 1,495,442 $ 1,374,359 $ 1,186,846
706,343
73,496
211,601
38,811
2,217,097
1,869,959
347,138
273,316
7,011
66,811
(11,206)
(5,746)
1,201
708,421
84,143
238,656
6,485
2,412,064
2,028,897
383,167
296,438
9,235
77,494
(11,685)
(5,830)
1,092
862,397
119,936
343,747
5,351
3,172,894
2,634,417
538,477
406,569
17,071
114,837
(34,636)
(15,453)
958
805,448
107,564
302,960
4,410
2,851,698
2,359,999
491,699
357,617
13,975
120,107
(17,580)
(11,891)
953
726,544
94,991
273,630
7,679
2,598,286
2,163,585
434,701
326,168
12,491
96,042
(12,221)
(8,667)
739
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
65,706
(25,369)
40,337
91,589
(35,610)
55,979
75,893
(29,397)
46,496
61,071
(24,258)
36,813
51,060
(19,789)
31,271
(3,033)
37,304 $
(2,352)
53,627 $
(884)
45,612 $
(938)
35,875 $
402
31,673
2.07
$
2.92
$
2.48
$
2.01
$
1.81
(0.16)
1.91 $
(0.12)
2.80 $
(0.05)
2.43 $
19,485
19,175
18,773
(0.05)
1.96 $
18,289
0.03
1.84
17,233
1.91
$
2.65
$
2.31
$
1.98
$
1.78
(0.14)
1.77 $
(0.11)
2.54 $
(0.04)
2.27 $
22,102
21,807
20,647
(0.05)
1.93 $
18,546
0.02
1.80
17,598
0.54
$
0.44
$
0.31
$
0.21 $
-
$
2006
149,701
603,306
1,579,357
595,293
16,557
296,769
493,393
2005
156,446
606,047
1,452,714
530,452
6,868
290,551
460,231
$
$
As of December 31,
2004
124,277
535,347
1,255,720
450,860
6,565
267,311
405,246
2003
158,682 $
444,130
1,101,767
435,229
14,299
178,467
357,542
2002
125,637
445,743
942,049
427,635
4,466
104,712
319,323
(1)
Includes stock-based compensation of $3.5 million in 2006 as a result of the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment,” effective January 1, 2006. Stock-based compensation recognized was $0.5
million in 2005, $240,000 in 2004, $185,000 in 2003 and $169,000 in 2002.
(2) Floorplan interest expense includes gains (losses) related to our interest rate swaps of $(1.9) million, $4.1 million, $3.7 million,
$1.7 million and $(0.7) million, respectively, in 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002.
22
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
You should read the following discussion in conjunction with Item 1. “Business,” Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and
our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto.
Overview
We are a leading operator of automotive franchises and retailer of new and used vehicles and services.
As of March 6, 2007, we offered 30 brands of new vehicles through 193 franchises in 108 stores in the
Western United States and over the Internet. As of December 31, 2006 we operated 16 stores in
Oregon, 15 in California, 14 in Texas, 12 in Washington, 8 in Iowa, 7 in Idaho, 7 in Colorado, 7 in Alaska,
7 in Montana, 6 in Nevada, 3 in Nebraska, 2 in South Dakota, 2 in North Dakota, 1 in New Mexico and 1
in Wisconsin. We sell new and used cars and light trucks; sell replacement parts; provide vehicle
maintenance, warranty, paint and repair services; and arrange related financing, service contracts,
protection products and credit insurance for our automotive customers.
We currently achieve gross profit margins above industry averages by selling a higher ratio of retail used
vehicles to new vehicles and by arranging finance and extended warranty contracts for a greater
percentage of our customers.
Our acquisition model is focused on acquiring new vehicle stores where the store is the only franchise of
that brand in the market. Our goal is to improve the operations of all four departments of every store we
acquire. We have had success with this strategy since our initial public offering in 1996. Since 1996, our
ability to integrate and improve the stores that we acquire has increased dramatically. We have also
developed a better process for identifying acquisition targets that fit our operating model. Our cash
position, substantial lines of credit, plus an experienced and well-trained staff are all available to facilitate
our continued growth as the opportunities develop.
In keeping with this model, we acquired 19 stores in 2006 and in the first two months of 2007 combined
with total estimated annual revenues of approximately $570 million. At December 31, 2006, we had 2
stores held for sale and listed as discontinued operations with combined revenues of approximately $49
million.
Manufacturer incentives were generally lower and less effective in 2006 than in 2005. However, we
expect that manufacturers will continue to offer incentives on new vehicle sales during 2007 through a
combination of repricing strategies, rebates, lease programs, early lease cancellation programs and low
interest rate loans to consumers. To complement the manufacturers’ incentive strategy, we employ a
volume-based strategy for our new vehicle sales.
We are currently working on several initiatives that we expect will improve our operations in future
periods. Such initiatives include the following:
• A Customer Centric Sales Process, which will help leverage the benefits of our Lithia Store
Management System (“LSMS”) which allows us to track advertising and increase the productivity
of the sales staff by providing daily work plans and focused training. Under this program,
showrooms will have interactive personal computers, which will allow the salesperson to quickly
and efficiently enter data and interact with the customer to speed up the sales process;
• A Finance and Insurance (“F&I”) Certification Program for our F&I managers;
•
• An Internet initiative, which involves developing a centralized department that will be staffed with
Improved functionality of our centralized inventory control and procurement process;
•
brand specialists capable of communicating with customers by phone or live chat;
IT initiatives related to automating our offices, centralizing certain office functions and establishing
independent used vehicle operations;
• An Assured Used Vehicle program and an independent used vehicle strategy. We began the
Assured Used Vehicle program in the Tri-Cities, Abilene and Reno markets during the second
quarter of 2006. We expect to have our first independent used vehicle outlet operating by late
summer of 2007; and
23
• Used Vehicle First Look Technology has been fully integrated across the entire network of stores.
We continue to train and optimize the usage of this technology in our stores. The First Look
Technology provides a Trade Analyzer, Inventory Management Center, Purchasing Center,
Redistribution Center and other functions that will help improve our used vehicle operations over
time.
Results of Continuing Operations
Certain revenue, gross profit margin and gross profit information by product line was as follows for 2006,
2005 and 2004:
2006
New vehicle .........................................................................................
Used vehicle(1) .....................................................................................
Finance and insurance(2) .....................................................................
Service, body and parts.......................................................................
Fleet and other…………………………………………………………….
2005
New vehicle .........................................................................................
Used vehicle(1) .....................................................................................
Finance and insurance(2) .....................................................................
Service, body and parts.......................................................................
Fleet and other…………………………………………………………….
2004
New vehicle .........................................................................................
Used vehicle(1) .....................................................................................
Finance and insurance(2) .....................................................................
Service, body and parts.......................................................................
Fleet and other…………………………………………………………….
Includes retail and wholesale used vehicles.
(1)
(2) Commissions reported net of anticipated cancellations.
Percent of
Total Revenues
58.0%
27.2
3.8
10.8
0.2
Percent of
Total Revenues
57.2%
28.2
3.8
10.6
0.2
Percent of
Total Revenues
57.6%
27.9
3.7
10.5
0.3
Gross
Profit
Margin
7.7%
12.7
100.0
48.5
29.7
Gross
Profit
Margin
8.0%
13.4
100.0
47.8
32.3
Gross
Profit
Margin
7.8%
12.6
100.0
47.4
15.9
Percent of Total
Gross Profit
26.2%
20.2
22.3
31.0
0.3
Percent of Total
Gross Profit
26.5%
21.8
21.9
29.5
0.3
Percent of Total
Gross Profit
27.0%
21.0
21.9
29.8
0.3
24
The following table sets forth selected condensed financial data expressed as a percentage of total
revenues for the periods indicated below.
Lithia Motors, Inc. (1)
Revenues:
New vehicle
Used vehicle
Finance and insurance
Service, body and parts
Fleet and other
Total revenues
Gross profit
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Depreciation and amortization
Income from continuing operations
Floorplan interest expense
Other interest expense
Other income, net
Income from continuing operations before taxes
Income tax expense
Income from continuing operations
(1) The percentages may not add due to rounding.
Year Ended December 31,
2005
2006
2004
58.0%
27.2
3.8
10.8
0.2
100.0%
17.0
12.8
0.5
3.6
1.1
0.5
0.0
2.1
0.8
1.3%
57.2%
28.2
3.8
10.6
0.2
100.0%
17.2
12.5
0.5
4.2
0.6
0.4
0.0
3.2
1.2
2.0%
57.6%
27.9
3.7
10.5
0.3
100.0%
16.7
12.6
0.5
3.7
0.5
0.3
0.0
2.9
1.1
1.8%
The following tables set forth the changes in our operating results from continuing operations in 2006
compared to 2005 and in 2005 compared to 2004:
(In Thousands)
Revenues:
New vehicle
Used vehicle
Finance and insurance
Service, body and parts
Fleet and other
Total revenues
Cost of sales:
New vehicle
Used vehicle
Service, body and parts
Fleet and other
Total cost of sales
Gross profit
Selling, general and administrative
Depreciation and amortization
Income from operations
Floorplan interest expense
Other interest expense
Other expense, net
Income from continuing operations before
income taxes
Income tax expense
Income from continuing operations
Year Ended
December 31,
2006
2005
Increase
(Decrease)
%
Increase
(Decrease)
$
1,841,463 $
862,397
119,936
343,747
5,351
3,172,894
1,700,481
753,256
176,920
3,760
2,634,417
538,477
406,569
17,071
114,837
(34,636)
(15,453)
958
$
1,631,316
805,448
107,564
302,960
4,410
2,851,698
1,501,062
697,908
158,043
2,986
2,359,999
491,699
357,617
13,975
120,107
(17,580)
(11,891)
953
65,706
(25,369)
40,337 $
91,589
(35,610)
55,979
$
$
210,147
56,949
12,372
40,787
941
321,196
199,419
55,348
18,877
774
274,418
46,778
48,952
3,096
(5,270)
17,056
3,562
5
(25,883)
(10,241)
(15,642)
12.9%
7.1
11.5
13.5
21.3
11.3
13.3
7.9
11.9
25.9
11.6
9.5
13.7
22.2
(4.4)
97.0
30.0
0.5
(28.3)
(28.8)
(27.9)%
25
New units sold
Average selling price per new vehicle
Used units sold
Average selling price per used vehicle
Finance and insurance sales per retail unit
(In Thousands)
Revenues:
New vehicle
Used vehicle
Finance and insurance
Service, body and parts
Fleet and other
Total revenues
Cost of sales:
New vehicle
Used vehicle
Service, body and parts
Fleet and other
Total cost of sales
Gross profit
Selling, general and administrative
Depreciation and amortization
Income from operations
Floorplan interest expense
Other interest expense
Other expense, net
Income from continuing operations before
income taxes
Income tax expense
Income from continuing operations
New units sold
Average selling price per new vehicle
Used units sold
Average selling price per used vehicle
Finance and insurance sales per retail unit
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Year Ended
December 31,
2006
66,224
27,807 $
68,706
12,552 $
2005
58,372
27,947
66,439
12,123
1,094 $
1,063
Year Ended
December 31,
2005
2004
1,631,316 $
805,448
107,564
302,960
4,410
2,851,698
1,501,062
697,908
158,043
2,986
2,359,999
491,699
357,617
13,975
120,107
(17,580)
(11,891)
953
1,495,442
726,544
94,991
273,630
7,679
2,598,286
1,378,188
635,031
143,905
6,461
2,163,585
434,701
326,168
12,491
96,042
(12,221)
(8,667)
739
91,589
(35,610)
55,979 $
75,893
(29,397)
46,496
Year Ended
December 31,
2005
58,372
27,947 $
66,439
12,123 $
2004
53,169
28,126
62,217
11,678
1,063 $
1,016
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Increase
(Decrease)
7,852
(140)
2,267
429
31
Increase
(Decrease)
135,874
78,904
12,573
29,330
(3,269)
253,412
122,874
62,877
14,138
(3,475)
196,414
56,998
31,449
1,484
24,065
5,359
3,224
214
15,696
6,213
9,483
%
Increase
(Decrease)
13.5%
(0.5)%
3.4%
3.5%
2.9%
%
Increase
(Decrease)
9.1%
10.9
13.2
10.7
(42.6)
9.8
8.9
9.9
9.8
(53.8)
9.1
13.1
9.6
11.9
25.1
43.9
37.2
29.0
20.7
21.1
20.4%
Increase
(Decrease)
5,203
(179)
4,222
445
47
%
Increase
(Decrease)
9.8%
(0.6)%
6.8%
3.8%
4.6%
26
Revenues
Total revenues increased 11.3% and 9.8%, respectively, in 2006 compared to 2005 and in 2005
compared to 2004.
The increase in 2006 compared to 2005 was a result of acquisitions, as well as a 3.7% increase in same-
store sales, excluding fleet. We believe that our strong operating systems, integrated store network and
regional market focus contributed to our same-store sales increase, especially in the new vehicle sales.
During 2006, we focused on new vehicle sales to gain market share and create long-term parts and
services business, which resulted in a 4.8% increase in same-store new vehicle retail sales in 2006
compared to 2005 and compared to an approximately 2.6% decrease in the industry during the same
period. These industry figures include a large number of fleet sales, so industry retail figures were down
substantially more. Improvements in same-store used vehicle sales were minor as a result of the
heightened focus on new vehicle sales in the year. The increases in unit sales are also benefiting our
parts and service business. The improvements in finance and insurance same-store sales resulted
primarily from the unit increases in sales of both new and used vehicles during 2006 compared to 2005.
The increase in 2005 compared to 2004 was primarily a result of acquisitions and a 1.9% increase in
same-store sales, which was driven by an increase in units sold. The increase in same store sales was
driven by same-store sales increases across all business lines. The “employee pricing” programs offered
by the domestic manufacturers during the second and third quarters of 2005, as well as a mix shift away
from trucks and SUVs, resulted in a decrease in average selling prices but an increase in new units sold,
the combination of which resulted in higher same-store new vehicle sales. The same programs also
contributed to improvements in same-store used vehicle sales due to the large number of good quality
used vehicle trade-ins associated with the high volume of new vehicle purchases. The improvement in
same-store service, body and parts revenue in 2005 compared to 2004 was a result of our continued
focus on service-advisor training and our Lifetime Oil Program. In addition, pricing and cost saving
initiatives across the service, body and parts business lines contributed to the improvement in 2005
compared to 2004.
Same-store sales percentage increases (decreases) were as follows:
2006 compared to 2005
2005 compared to 2004
New vehicle retail, excluding fleet
Used vehicle, including wholesale
Total vehicle sales, excluding fleet
Finance and insurance
Service, body and parts
Total sales, excluding fleet
4.8%
0.6
3.4
5.1
5.3
3.7
0.9%
3.7
1.8
1.7
2.9
1.9
Same store sales are calculated for stores that were in operation as of December 31, 2005, and only
including the months of operations for both comparable periods. For example, a store acquired in June
2005 would be included in same store operating data beginning in July 2006, after its first full complete
comparable month of operation. Thus, operating results for same store comparisons would include only
the periods of July through December of both comparable years.
Fleet and other sales include both fleet sales and fees received for delivering vehicles on behalf of the
manufacturer, the U.S. military, rent-a-car companies or leasing companies.
Penetration rates for certain products were as follows:
Finance and insurance
Service contracts
Lifetime oil change and filter
2006
77%
42
39
2005
76%
43
38
2004
77%
43
36
27
The decrease in the finance and insurance penetration rate in 2005 compared to 2004 was due to reduced
availability of manufacturer subsidized low-interest rate loans during the second and third quarters of 2005
when the manufacturers offered their employee pricing programs.
Gross Profit
Gross profit increased $46.8 million in 2006 compared to 2005 and increased $57.0 million in 2005
compared to 2004 due primarily to increased total revenues. An increase in the overall gross profit margin
also contributed to the increase in 2005 compared to 2004.
Gross profit margins achieved were as follows:
New vehicle ...............................................................
Retail used vehicle ....................................................
Wholesale used vehicles ...........................................
Finance and insurance ..............................................
Service, body and parts.............................................
Overall ......................................................................
New vehicle ...............................................................
Retail used vehicle ....................................................
Wholesale used vehicles ...........................................
Finance and insurance ..............................................
Service, body and parts.............................................
Overall ......................................................................
Year Ended December 31,
2005
2006
7.7%
8.0%
14.9
2.4
100.0
48.5
17.0
15.6
2.7
100.0
47.8
17.2
Lithia
Margin Change*
(30)bp
(70)
(30)
-
70
(20)
Year Ended December 31,
2004
2005
8.0%
7.8%
Lithia
Margin Change*
20bp
15.6
2.7
100.0
47.8
17.2
14.4
3.2
100.0
47.4
16.7
120
(50)
-
40
50
* “bp” stands for basis points (one hundred basis points equals one percent).
The decrease in new vehicle gross profit margin in 2006 compared to 2005 was due to our focus on
selling volume and gaining market share in 2006. Our historical average gross profit margin achieved on
new vehicles over the past five years was 8.0%.
The decrease in retail used vehicle gross profit margin in 2006 compared to 2005 was due to a
comparison to unusually high gross margins achieved in 2005, which resulted primarily from a healthy
supply of good-quality trade-ins during the employee pricing programs. Our historical average gross profit
margin achieved on retail used vehicles over the past five years was 14.3%.
The decrease in wholesale used vehicle gross profit margin in 2006 compared to 2005 was due to
wholesale market conditions, a focus on retailing more used vehicles and bringing in trade-ins nearer to
true market value. Our ability to provide customers with a better value for their trade-ins, bringing them in
closer to their true market value, has been improved by our use of the first look technology. This,
however, lowers the gross profit margin we are able to achieve on the re-sale of these trade-ins. In
addition, as we focus on retailing more used vehicles, we are left with the lower-quality used vehicles for
wholesaling, which also contributed to lower gross profit margins. We dispose of our wholesale used
vehicles by using centralized controls, holding our own local used vehicle auctions and managing the
disposal of units at larger third party auctions.
The increases in service, body and parts gross profit margin in 2006 compared to 2005 and in 2005
compared to 2004 were due to our continued focus on service advisor training, which has led to gains in
the sale of higher margin service items and increases in customer-pay business, as well as a number of
pricing and cost saving initiatives. Higher penetration rates for our lifetime oil change and filter service
also contributed to these gross profit margin increases.
In addition to the reasons discussed above, the decline in the overall gross profit margin during 2006
compared to 2005 was also due to our focus on increased new vehicle sales, which carry a lower margin
than the other business lines.
28
In the new vehicle business, margins remained relatively constant in 2005 compared to 2004 as a result
of strategic initiatives and internal directives in 2004 and early 2005 that increased gross profit per vehicle
sold. These margin raising initiatives were partially offset in 2005 by manufacturers’ “employee pricing”
programs, which created a higher volume, lower margin environment during the second and third quarters
of 2005.
Retail used vehicle margins improved in 2005 compared to 2004 as a result of a stronger pricing and
retail environment for used vehicles in combination with a large quantity of good quality used vehicle
trade-ins.
Margins in our wholesale used vehicle business declined in 2005 compared to 2004 as a result of
aggressive wholesaling in the third and fourth quarters of 2005 designed to clear inventories going into
the seasonally slower winter months. Gross profits per unit remained positive.
Same-store gross profit increased 2.1% in 2006 compared to 2005 and increased 3.2% in 2005
compared to 2004, mainly due to increases in same store revenues.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense
Selling, general and administrative expense (“SG&A”) includes salaries and related personnel expenses,
facility lease expense, advertising (net of manufacturer cooperative advertising credits), legal, accounting,
professional services and general corporate expenses.
SG&A increased $49.0 million in 2006 compared to 2005 and increased $31.4 million in 2005 compared
to 2004. SG&A as a percentage of revenue increased by 30 basis points in 2006 compared to 2005 and
decreased by 10 basis points in 2005 compared to 2004.
The increases in dollars spent in 2006 compared to 2005 and in 2005 compared to 2004 were due
primarily to increased selling, or variable, expenses related to the increases in acquisition revenues and
the number of locations. Approximately $33.3 million and $30.4 million of the increase in SG&A was due
to these factors in 2006 compared to 2005 and in 2005 compared to 2004, respectively. In addition,
stock-based compensation included in SG&A increased to $3.5 million in 2006 compared to $0.5 in 2005
and $240,000 in 2004 as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 123R in January 2006.
After salaries and wages, the next four largest expense categories, sales compensation, payroll taxes,
rent and advertising, all improved or were flat as a percentage of gross profit in 2006 compared to 2005.
SG&A in 2006 also included expenses for certain initiatives that we expect will lead to operating
efficiencies in future periods as discussed in “Overview” above.
SG&A as a percentage of gross profit is an industry standard and a better gauge for measuring
performance relative to SG&A expense. As a result of the charges related to our operating initiatives and
the other charges detailed above, SG&A as a percentage of gross profit increased by 280 basis points in
2006 compared to 2005. The change in stock-based compensation and the charge for the worker’s
compensation claim resulted in a 75 basis point increase out of the 280 basis point total increase. We
expect to continue to incur charges in 2007 related to our operating initiatives and also expect our health
and benefit plan costs to increase materially in 2007 compared to 2006.
SG&A as a percentage of gross profit improved by 230 basis points in 2005 compared to 2004 as we
continued to realize the positive results of multiple cost saving initiatives at our corporate headquarters
and in the stores.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization increased $3.1 million and $1.5 million, respectively, in 2006 compared to
2005 and in 2005 compared to 2004 due to the addition of property and equipment primarily related to our
acquisitions, as well as leasehold improvements to existing facilities.
29
Income from Operations
Operating margins decreased by 60 basis points to 3.6% in 2006 compared to 4.2% in 2005, due to the
decrease in overall gross profit margin and the increase in SG&A as discussed above. Operating margins
improved by 50 basis points in 2005 compared to 3.7% in 2004, primarily due to improved overall gross
profit margin as discussed above. In addition, in 2005, operating expenses as a percentage of revenue
improved by 10 basis points compared to 2004.
Floorplan Interest Expense
Floorplan interest expense increased $17.1 million in 2006 compared to 2005. An increase of $9.6 million
resulted from increases in the average interest rates on our floorplan facilities, an increase of $4.8 million
resulted from increases in the average outstanding balances of our floorplan facilities and an increase of
$2.7 million related to our interest rate swaps.
Floorplan interest expense increased $5.4 million in 2005 compared to 2004. An increase of $7.8 million
resulted from increases in the average interest rates on our floorplan facilities and an increase of $1.3
million resulted from increases in the average outstanding balances of our floorplan facilities. These
increases were partially offset by a $3.7 million decrease related to our interest rate swaps.
Other Interest Expense
Other interest expense includes interest on our senior subordinated convertible notes, debt incurred
related to acquisitions, real estate mortgages, our used vehicle line of credit and equipment related notes.
Other interest expense increased $3.6 million in 2006 compared to 2005. Changes in the weighted
average interest rate on our debt in 2006 compared to 2005 increased other interest expense by
approximately $0.5 million and changes in the average outstanding balances resulted in an increase of
approximately $3.1 million. Interest expense related to the $85.0 million of senior subordinated
convertible notes that were issued in May 2004 totals approximately $765,000 per quarter, which consists
of $611,000 of contractual interest and $154,000 of amortization of debt issuance costs.
Other interest expense increased $3.2 million in 2005 compared to 2004. Changes in the weighted
average interest rate on our debt in 2005 compared to 2004 increased other interest expense by
approximately $1.4 million and changes in the average outstanding balances resulted in an increase of
approximately $1.8 million.
Other interest expense excludes $1.5 million, $0.9 million and $0.5 million, respectively, of capitalized
interest in 2006, 2005 and 2004.
Income Tax Expense
Our effective tax rate was 38.6% in 2006, 38.9% in 2005 and 38.7% in 2004. Our federal income tax rate
is 35% and our state income tax rate is currently 3.05%, which varies with the mix of states where our
stores are located. We also have certain non-deductible expenses and other adjustments that increased
our effective rate at for 2006 to 38.6%. Our effective tax rate may be affected in the future by the mix of
asset acquisitions compared to corporate acquisitions, as well as by the mix of states where our stores
are located. The increase in our effective tax rate in 2005 compared to 2004 was due primarily to an
increase in revenue in some of our higher tax rate states.
30
Income from Continuing Operations
Income from continuing operations as a percentage of revenue decreased in 2006 compared to 2005 as
a result of the decreased overall gross profit margin, increased SG&A and increased interest expense as
discussed above.
Income from continuing operations as a percentage of revenue increased in 2005 compared to 2004 as a
result of improvements in gross profit margins and operating expenses as discussed above.
Discontinued Operations
We continually monitor the performance of each of our dealerships and make determinations to sell
based primarily on return on capital criteria. When a dealership meets the criteria of “held for sale,” as
defined in SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” the results of
operations are reclassified into discontinued operations. All dealerships included in discontinued
operations have been, or will be, eliminated from our on-going operations upon completion of the
sale. We anticipate the completion of the sale for each dealership to occur within 12 months from the date
of determination.
During 2006, we disposed of two of our dealerships that were held for sale at December 31, 2005 and, at
December 31, 2006, two dealerships were held for sale.
Certain financial information related to discontinued operations was as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
Revenue
Pre-tax loss
Gain (loss) on disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax
Amount of goodwill and other intangible assets disposed of
$
2006
60,044
(4,991)
(554)
3,552
$
$
2005
129,602
(3,894)
16
4,406
2004
181,484
(1,442)
186
1,900
Interest expense is allocated to stores classified as discontinued operations for actual flooring interest
expense directly related to the new vehicles in the store. Interest expense related to our used vehicle line
of credit is allocated based on total used vehicle inventory of the store, and interest expense related to
our equipment line of credit is allocated based on the amount of fixed assets.
Assets held for sale included the following (in thousands):
December 31,
Inventories
Property, plant and equipment
Goodwill and other intangible assets
2006
11,594
2,949
942
15,485
$
$
2005
22,703
817
3,891
27,411
$
$
Liabilities held for sale included the following (in thousands):
December 31,
Floorplan notes payable
Real estate debt
2006
9,605
2,005
11,610
$
$
2005
22,388
-
22,388
$
$
31
Selected Consolidated Quarterly Financial Data
The following tables set forth our unaudited quarterly financial data(1).
2006
Revenues:
New vehicle sales..............................................................
Used vehicle sales.............................................................
Finance and insurance………………………………….....
Service, body and parts.....................................................
Fleet and other ..................................................................
Total revenues................................................................
Cost of sales........................................................................
Gross profit ..........................................................................
Selling, general and administrative......................................
Depreciation and amortization.............................................
Income from operations.......................................................
Floorplan interest expense ..................................................
Other interest expense ........................................................
Other, net.............................................................................
Income from continuing operations before income taxes ....
Income taxes .......................................................................
Income before discontinued operations ..............................
Discontinued operations, net of tax .....................................
Net income ..........................................................................
Basic income per share from continuing operations ...........
Basic loss per share from discontinued operations .............
Basic net income per share .................................................
Diluted income per share from continuing operations .........
Diluted loss per share from discontinued operations ..........
Diluted net income per share...............................................
2005
Revenues:
New vehicle .......................................................................
Used vehicle ......................................................................
Finance and insurance………………………………….....
Service, body and parts.....................................................
Fleet and other ..................................................................
Total revenues................................................................
Cost of sales........................................................................
Gross profit ..........................................................................
Selling, general and administrative......................................
Depreciation and amortization.............................................
Income from operations.......................................................
Floorplan interest expense ..................................................
Other interest expense ........................................................
Other, net.............................................................................
Income from continuing operations before income taxes ....
Income taxes .......................................................................
Income before discontinued operations ..............................
Discontinued operations, net of tax .....................................
Net income ..........................................................................
Basic income per share from continuing operations ...........
Basic loss per share from discontinued operations .............
Basic net income per share .................................................
Diluted income per share from continuing operations .........
Diluted loss per share from discontinued operations ..........
Diluted net income per share...............................................
(1) Quarterly data may not add to yearly totals due to rounding.
Three Months Ended,
March 31
June 30
September 30
December 31
(in thousands, except per share data )
$420,395
206,506
27,231
81,084
1,155
736,371
608,593
127,778
97,564
3,983
26,231
(5,405)
(3,299)
378
17,905
(6,969)
10,936
(1,568)
$ 9,368
$ 0.56
(0.08)
$ 0.48
$ 0.52
(0.07)
$ 0.45
$487,457
228,741
32,384
84,216
798
833,596
692,654
140,942
104,273
4,148
32,521
(8,223)
(3,607)
263
20,954
(8,839)
12,115
(224)
$ 11,891
$ 0.62
(0.01)
$ 0.61
$ 0.57
(0.01)
$ 0.56
$506,394
236,868
33,564
88,448
1,832
867,106
723,453
143,653
106,147
4,348
33,158
(12,866)
(3,782)
128
16,638
(5,941)
10,697
(181)
$ 10,516
$ 0.55
(0.01)
$ 0.54
$ 0.51
(0.01)
$ 0.50
$427,217
190,282
26,757
89,999
1,566
735,821
609,717
126,104
98,585
4,592
22,927
(8,142)
(4,765)
189
10,209
(3,620)
6,589
(1,060)
$ 5,529
$ 0.34
(0.06)
$ 0.28
$ 0.32
(0.05)
$ 0.27
Three Months Ended,
March 31
June 30
September 30
December 31
(in thousands, except per share data )
$425,078
197,201
26,686
73,672
1,700
724,337
601,073
123,264
90,029
3,342
29,893
(7,628)
(3,001)
195
19,459
(7,713)
11,746
(328)
$ 11,418
$ 0.61
(0.01)
$ 0.60
$ 0.56
(0.01)
$ 0.55
$498,264
223,446
31,928
79,006
987
833,631
694,770
138,861
95,104
3,559
40,198
(3,159)
(2,999)
132
34,172
(13,982)
20,190
(417)
$ 19,773
$ 1.05
(0.02)
$ 1.03
$ 0.94
(0.02)
$ 0.92
$361,222
190,538
24,881
77,819
847
655,307
539,243
116,064
86,481
3,752
25,831
(5,217)
(3,120)
402
17,896
(6,124)
11,772
(1,282)
$ 10,490
$ 0.61
(0.07)
$ 0.54
$ 0.56
(0.06)
$ 0.50
$346,752
194,263
24,069
72,463
876
638,423
524,913
113,510
86,003
3,322
24,185
(1,576)
(2,771)
224
20,062
(7,791)
12,271
(325)
$ 11,946
$ 0.64
(0.01)
$ 0.63
$ 0.59
(0.02)
$ 0.57
32
Seasonality and Quarterly Fluctuations
Historically, our sales have been lower in the first and fourth quarters of each year due to consumer
purchasing patterns during the holiday season, inclement weather in certain of our markets and the reduced
number of business days during the holiday season. As a result, financial performance is expected to be
lower during the first and fourth quarters than during the second and third quarters of each fiscal year. We
believe that interest rates, levels of consumer debt, consumer confidence and manufacturer sales
incentives, as well as general economic conditions, also contribute to fluctuations in sales and operating
results. Acquisitions have also been a contributor to fluctuations in our operating results from quarter to
quarter.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal needs for capital resources are to finance acquisitions and capital expenditures, as well as for
working capital and the funding of our cash dividend payments. We have relied primarily upon internally
generated cash flows from operations, borrowings under our credit agreements and the proceeds from
public equity and private debt offerings to finance operations and expansion. We believe that our available
cash, cash equivalents, available lines of credit and cash flows from operations will be sufficient to meet our
anticipated operating expenses, capital requirements, projected acquisitions and current level of cash
dividends for at least the next 24 months from December 31, 2006.
Our inventories decreased to $603.3 million at December 31, 2006 from $606.0 million at December 31,
2005. We slowed ordering vehicles in the third and fourth quarters of 2006 and worked to sell down our new
vehicle inventory. As a result, our days supply of new vehicles at December 31, 2006 was 8 days below our
average historical December 31 balances and more than 30 days below our December 31, 2005 levels. In
addition, by the end of January 2007, we had reduced our new vehicles inventory by another 11 days, which
positioned us well going into the remainder of 2007.
Our focus on new vehicle unit sales in 2006 led to more trade-ins, which resulted in increased used vehicle
inventories. As a result, our days supply of used vehicles at December 31, 2006 was 4 days above average
levels for December 31.
Our new and used flooring notes payable increased to $595.3 million at December 31, 2006 from $530.5
million at December 31, 2005. New vehicles are financed at approximately 100% and used vehicles are
financed at approximately 80% of cost. Used vehicles are financed as needed, utilizing our used vehicle
flooring credit facility.
Our Board of Directors declared dividends of $0.12 per share on our Class A and Class B common stock,
which were paid in March and May of 2006, and totaled approximately $2.3 million and $2.4 million,
respectively. In addition, our Board of Directors approved an increase in our dividend to $0.14 per share for
both the second and third quarters 2006, which totaled approximately $2.8 million and $2.7 million,
respectively. A dividend of $0.14 per share was also paid on our Class A and Class B common stock in
January 2007 for the fourth quarter of 2006, which totaled $2.7 million. We anticipate recommending to the
Board of Directors the approval of a cash dividend each quarter.
In June 2000, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 1,000,000 shares of our Class A
common stock. Through December 31, 2006, we have purchased a total of 256,831 shares under this
program, of which 196,600 were purchased during 2006. We may continue to repurchase shares from time
to time in the future as conditions warrant. The recent change in the tax law tends to equalize the benefits of
dividends and share repurchases as a means to return capital or earnings to shareholders. As a result, we
believe it is now advantageous to shareholders to have a dividend in place. With the dividend, we are able
to offer an immediate and tangible return to our shareholders without reducing our already limited market
float, which occurs when we repurchase shares. However, when we believe that repurchases present an
attractive use of our capital, we would expect to make strategic repurchases.
33
We have a working capital, acquisition and used vehicle flooring credit facility with U.S. Bank National
Association, DaimlerChrysler Financial Services Americas LLC (“DCFS”) and Toyota Motor Credit
Corporation (“TMCC”), totaling up to $225 million, which expires August 31, 2009. Loans are guaranteed by
all of our subsidiaries and are secured by new vehicle inventory, used vehicle and parts inventory,
equipment other than fixtures, deposit accounts, accounts receivable, investment property and other
intangible personal property. Stock and other equity interests of our subsidiary dealerships and certain other
subsidiaries are excluded. The lenders’ security interest in new vehicle inventory is subordinated to the
interests of floorplan financing lenders, including DCFS and TMCC. The agreement for this facility provides
for events of default that include nonpayment, breach of covenants, a change of control and certain cross-
defaults with other indebtedness. In the event of a default, the agreement provides that the lenders may
declare the entire principal balance immediately due, foreclose on collateral and increase the applicable
interest rate to the revolving loan rate plus 3 percent, among other remedies.
The facility agreement includes financial and restrictive covenants typical of such agreements. Financial
covenants include requirements to maintain a minimum total net worth and imposes minimum current ratio,
fixed charge coverage ratio and cash flow leverage ratio requirements. The covenants restrict us from
incurring additional indebtedness, making investments, selling or acquiring assets and granting security
interests in our assets. At December 31, 2006, we were in compliance with all of the financial and restrictive
covenants.
In addition, cash dividends are limited to $15 million per fiscal year and repurchases by us of our common
stock are limited to $20 million per fiscal year.
Ford Motor Credit, General Motors Acceptance Corporation (“GMAC”), Volkswagen Credit and BMW
Financial Services NA, LLC have agreed to floor all of our new vehicles for their respective brands with
DaimlerChrysler Financial Services Americas LLC and Toyota Motor Credit Corporation serving as the
primary lenders for substantially all other brands. These new vehicle lines are secured by new vehicle
inventory of the relevant brands. Vehicles financed by lenders not directly associated with the
manufacturer are classified as floorplan notes payable: non-trade and are included as a financing activity
in our statements of cash flows. Vehicles financed by lenders directly associated with the manufacturer
are classified as floorplan notes payable and are included as an operating activity.
On November 30, 2006, General Motors (“GM”) completed the sale of a majority equity stake in GMAC to
an investment consortium. Although GMAC will continue to be the exclusive provider of GM financial
products and services and continues to have the relationships with GM, a majority equity stake in GMAC
has been sold to an independent third-party and GM has indicated in its public filings that it no longer
controls the GMAC entity. As a result, we will be treating new vehicles financed by GMAC after the
change in ownership control as floorplan notes payable: non-trade and related changes as a financing
activity in our statements of cash flows. Vehicles financed prior to this change in control will continue to
be classified as floorplan notes payable: trade, with related changes reflected as operating activities in
our statements of cash flows, since these GMAC vehicle financings occurred while GM retained control of
GMAC as its captive finance subsidiary.
We expect to be in compliance with the covenants for all of our debt agreements in the foreseeable future.
In the event that we are unable to meet such requirements, and any available cure period has passed, the
lender may require an acceleration of payment, increase the interest rate or limit our ability to borrow or pay
cash dividends.
34
Interest rates on all of the above facilities ranged from 6.47% to 7.50% at December 31, 2006. Amounts
outstanding on the lines at December 31, 2006, together with amounts remaining available under such lines
were as follows (in thousands):
New and program vehicle lines
Working capital, acquisition and used vehicle line
Outstanding at
December 31, 2006
$499,679
144,000
$643,679
Remaining Availability as
of December 31, 2006
$ (1)
80,089(2)
$80,089
(1) There are no formal limits on the new and program vehicle lines with certain lenders.
(2) Reduced by $911,000 for outstanding letters of credit.
We also have outstanding $85.0 million of 2.875% senior subordinated convertible notes due 2014. We will
also pay contingent interest on the notes during any six-month interest period beginning May 1, 2009, in
which the trading price of the notes for a specified period of time equals or exceeds 120% of the principal
amount of the notes. The notes are convertible into shares of our Class A common stock at a price of
$37.69 per share upon the satisfaction of certain conditions and upon the occurrence of certain events as
follows:
•
if, prior to May 1, 2009, and during any calendar quarter, the closing sale price of our common stock
exceeds 120% of the conversion price for at least 20 trading days in the 30 consecutive trading
days ending on the last trading day of the preceding calendar quarter;
if, after May 1, 2009, the closing sale price of our common stock exceeds 120% of the conversion
price;
if, during the five business day period after any five consecutive trading day period in which the
trading price per $1,000 principal amount of notes for each day of such period was less than 98% of
the product of the closing sale price of our common stock and the number of shares issuable upon
conversion of $1,000 principal amount of the notes;
if the notes have been called for redemption; or
•
•
•
• upon certain specified corporate events.
A declaration and payment of a dividend in excess of $0.08 per share per quarter will result in an adjustment
in the conversion rate for the notes if such cumulative adjustment exceeds 1% of the current conversion
rate. We declared dividends of $0.14 per share for the quarters ended June 30, September 30 and
December 31, 2006 and dividends of $0.12 per share for each of the four preceding quarters. Effective
January 17, 2007, we exceeded the 1% threshold required for a change in the conversion rate. With this
change, the conversion rate per $1,000 of notes increased to 26.8556 from 26.5331.
The notes are redeemable at our option beginning May 6, 2009 at the redemption price of 100% of the
principal amount plus any accrued interest. The holders of the notes can require us to repurchase all or
some of the notes on May 1, 2009 and upon certain events constituting a fundamental change or a
termination of trading. A fundamental change is any transaction or event in which all or substantially all of
our common stock is exchanged for, converted into, acquired for, or constitutes solely the right to receive,
consideration that is not all, or substantially all, common stock that is listed on, or immediately after the
transaction or event, will be listed on, a United States national securities exchange. A termination of trading
will have occurred if our common stock is not listed for trading on a national securities exchange or the
Nasdaq National Market.
Our earnings to fixed charge coverage ratio, as defined in the senior subordinated convertible notes, was
2.11 for the quarter ended December 31, 2006.
35
Contractual Payment Obligations
A summary of our contractual commitments and obligations as of December 31, 2006 was as follows (in
thousands):
Contractual
Obligation
Floorplan Notes
Lines of Credit and
Long-Term Debt
Interest on Scheduled
Debt Payments
Capital Commitments
Operating Leases
Total
499,679
$
2007
499,679
$
408,940
16,557
60,489
64,273
184,620
$ 1,218,001
$
11,539
46,639
23,911
598,325
$
$
Payments Due By Period
2008 and
2009
-
$
2010 and
2011
-
2012 and
beyond
-
$
206,563
32,834
152,986
17,674
17,634
41,415
283,286
$
12,119
-
28,556
73,509
19,157
-
90,738
262,881
$
We had capital commitments of $62.7 million at December 31, 2006 for the construction of nine new
facilities and additions to two existing facilities. Of the new facilities, five are replacing existing facilities. We
have already incurred $6.1 million for these projects and anticipate incurring an additional $45.0 million in
2007 and $17.7 million in 2008. We expect to pay for the construction out of existing cash balances until
completion of the projects, at which time we anticipate securing long-term financing and general borrowings
from third party lenders for 70% to 90% of the amounts expended.
We also had capital commitments of $1.6 million for the acquisition and development of hardware and
software for several information technology initiatives. We anticipate incurring these amounts during 2007.
In addition to the above, we have approximately $112.3 million in planned capital expenditures under
consideration for various new facilities and remodeling projects. These projects are still in the planning stage
or are awaiting approvals from governmental agencies or manufacturers. We feel that these projects are a
critical part of our future growth strategy.
We have also recorded a reserve for our estimated contractual obligations related to potential charge-backs
for vehicle service contracts, lifetime oil change contracts and other various insurance contracts that are
terminated early by the customer. At December 31, 2006, this reserve totaled $14.5 million. Based on past
experience, we estimate that the $14.5 million will be paid out as follows: $8.8 million in 2007; $3.8 million in
2008; $1.4 million in 2009; $0.4 million in 2010; and $0.1 million thereafter.
Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America requires us to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and
reported amounts of revenues and expenses at the date of the financial statements. Some of our
accounting policies require us to make difficult and subjective judgments on matters that are inherently
uncertain. The following accounting policies involve critical accounting estimates because they are
particularly dependent on assumptions made by management. While we have made our best estimates
based on facts and circumstances available to us at the time, different estimates could have been used in
the current period. Changes in the accounting estimates we used are reasonably likely to occur from
period to period, which may have a material impact on the presentation of our financial condition and
results of operations.
Our most critical accounting estimates include service contract and lifetime oil contract income
recognition, workers’ compensation insurance premium accrual, discretionary employee bonus accrual,
assessment of recoverability of goodwill and other intangible assets, and used vehicle inventory
valuations. We also have other key accounting policies, such as our policies for valuation of accounts
receivable, expense accruals and other revenue recognition. However, these policies either do not meet
36
the definition of critical accounting estimates described above or are not currently material items in our
financial statements. We review our estimates, judgments and assumptions periodically and reflect the
effects of revisions in the period that they are deemed to be necessary. We believe that these estimates
are reasonable. However, actual results could differ from these estimates.
Service Contract and Lifetime Oil Change Contract Income Recognition
We receive fees from the sale of vehicle service contracts and lifetime oil contracts to customers. The
contracts are sold through an unrelated third party, but we may be charged back for a portion of the fees
in the event of early termination of the contracts by customers. We have established a reserve for
estimated future charge-backs based on an analysis of historical charge-backs in conjunction with
estimated lives of the applicable contracts. If future cancellations are different than expected based on
historical experience, we could have additional expense or income related to the cancellations in future
periods. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, this reserve totaled $13.2 million and $12.2 million,
respectively, and is included in accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities on our consolidated
balance sheets. We may also participate in future underwriting profit pursuant to retrospective
commission arrangements, which would be recognized as income upon receipt.
Workers’ Compensation Insurance Premium Accrual
Insurance premiums are paid for under a three-year retrospective cost policy, whereby premium cost
depends on experience. We accrue premiums based on our historical experience rating, although the
actual claims can be something greater or less than the historical experience, which could create our
estimated liability to either be under or over accrued. As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the accrual for
insurance premiums was $3.1 million and $2.3 million, respectively, and is included in accrued liabilities
and other long-term liabilities on our consolidated balance sheets. We expect that the retrospective cost
policy, as opposed to a guaranteed cost with a flat premium, will be the most cost efficient over time.
Discretionary Employee Bonus Accrual
We make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions regarding the likelihood of our attainment, and
the level thereof, of the annual bonus criteria under our 2006 Discretionary Support Services Bonus
Program in order to record bonus expense on a quarterly basis. We accrue the estimated year-end
expense on a pro-rata basis throughout the year based on bonus attainment expectations. These
estimates, judgments and assumptions are made quarterly based on available information and take into
consideration the historical seasonality of our business and current trends. If actual year-end results differ
materially from our estimates, the amount of bonus expense recorded in a particular quarter could be
significantly over or under estimated. The bonus accrual at the end of any given year is accurate and
reflective of actual results attained and amounts to be paid.
Intangible Assets
We review our goodwill and other identifiable non-amortizable intangible assets for impairment at least
annually by applying a fair-value based test using discounted estimated cash flows. Discounted future
cash flows are prepared by applying a growth rate to historical revenues. Growth rates are calculated
individually for each region with data derived from the U.S. Census Bureau on population growth and the
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics for historical consumer price index data. The
discount rate applied to the future cash flows is derived from a hybrid Capital Asset Pricing Model which
factors in an equity risk premium and a risk free rate, combined with a weighted average cost of capital
model. The review is conducted more frequently than annually if events or circumstances occur that
warrant a review. Our other identifiable intangible assets primarily include the franchise value of the
business unit, which is considered to have an indefinite life and not subject to amortization, but rather is
included in the fair-value based testing. Impairment could occur if the operating business unit book value
is greater than the determined fair-value. At such point, an impairment loss would be recognized to the
extent that the carrying amount exceeds the assets’ fair value. We have determined that we operate as
one business unit. During 2006 and 2005, we concluded that there was no impairment to the carrying
value of our intangible assets. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, goodwill and other identifiable non-
amortizable intangible assets totaled $376 million and $311 million, respectively.
37
Used Vehicle Inventory
Used vehicle inventories are stated at cost plus the cost of any equipment added, reconditioning and
transportation. We select a sampling of dealerships throughout the year to perform quarterly testing of
book values against market valuations utilizing the Kelly Blue Book and NADA guidelines. Used vehicle
inventory values are cyclical and could experience impairment when market valuations are significantly
below inventory carrying values. Historically, we have not experienced significant write-downs on our
used vehicle inventory. If the book value of our used vehicles is actually more than fair value, we could
experience lower gross margins on our used vehicles in future periods.
Service Work Performed for Vehicles in Inventory
Many of our vehicles currently in inventory include a mark up for gross profit due to service work
performed on those vehicles. The service work performed includes charges to recondition used vehicles,
accessories added to the vehicles and work performed to ready the vehicle for sale. We defer an estimate
of the gross profit on vehicles in inventory based on a historical analysis of actual charges to inventory.
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the estimate of deferred gross profit was $4.0 million and $3.3 million,
respectively. If the actual gross profit on an individual vehicle is more or less than the estimated deferred
amount, we could potentially have deferred an amount different than the actual service work performed.
Any differences in estimates compared to actual would be reflected in the gross margins in future periods.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 19 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a material
current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses,
results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Variable Rate Debt
We use variable-rate debt to finance our new and program vehicle inventory and certain real estate
holdings. The interest rates on our variable rate debt are tied to either the one or three-month LIBOR or
the prime rate. These debt obligations therefore expose us to variability in interest payments due to
changes in these rates. The flooring debt is based on open-ended lines of credit tied to each individual
store from the various manufacturer finance companies. If interest rates increase, interest expense
increases. Conversely, if interest rates decrease, interest expense decreases.
Our variable-rate flooring notes payable, variable rate mortgage notes payable and other credit line
borrowings subject us to market risk exposure. At December 31, 2006, we had $689.7 million outstanding
under such agreements at interest rates ranging from 6.47% to 9.36% per annum. A 10% increase in
interest rates would increase annual interest expense by approximately $2.3 million, net of tax, based on
amounts outstanding at December 31, 2006.
Fixed Rate Debt
The fair market value of our long-term fixed interest rate debt is subject to interest rate risk. Generally, the
fair market value of fixed interest rate debt will increase as interest rates fall because we could refinance
for a lower rate. Conversely, the fair value of fixed interest rate debt will decrease as interest rates rise.
The interest rate changes affect the fair market value but do not impact earnings or cash flows.
38
Based on open market trades, we determined that our $85.0 million of long-term convertible fixed interest
rate debt had a fair market value of approximately $81.2 million at December 31, 2006. In addition, at
December 31, 2006, we had $133.9 million of other long-term fixed interest rate debt outstanding with
maturity dates of between October 2007 and May 2022. Based on discounted cash flows, we have
determined that the fair market value of this long-term fixed interest rate debt was approximately $132.3
million at December 31, 2006.
Hedging Strategies
We believe it is prudent to limit the variability of a portion of our interest payments. Accordingly, we have
entered into interest rate swaps to manage the variability of our interest rate exposure, thus leveling a
portion of our interest expense in a rising or falling rate environment.
We have effectively changed the variable-rate cash flow exposure on a portion of our flooring debt to
fixed-rate cash flows by entering into receive-variable, pay-fixed interest rate swaps. Under the interest
rate swaps, we receive variable interest rate payments and make fixed interest rate payments, thereby
creating fixed rate flooring debt.
We do not enter into derivative instruments for any purpose other than to manage interest rate exposure.
That is, we do not engage in interest rate speculation using derivative instruments.
As of December 31, 2006, we had outstanding the following interest rate swaps with U.S. Bank Dealer
Commercial Services:
• effective January 26, 2003 – a five year, $25 million interest rate swap at a fixed rate of 3.265%
per annum, variable rate adjusted on the 26th of each month
• effective February 18, 2003 – a five year, $25 million interest rate swap at a fixed rate of 3.30%
per annum, variable rate adjusted on the 1st and 16th of each month
• effective November 18, 2003 – a five year, $25 million interest rate swap at a fixed rate of 3.65%
per annum, variable rate adjusted on the 1st and 16th of each month
• effective November 26, 2003 – a five year, $25 million interest rate swap at a fixed rate of 3.63%
per annum, variable rate adjusted on the 26th of each month
• effective March 9, 2004 – a five year, $25 million interest rate swap at a fixed rate of 3.25% per
annum, variable rate adjusted on the 1st and 16th of each month;
• effective March 18, 2004 – a five year, $25 million interest rate swap at a fixed rate of 3.10% per
annum, variable rate adjusted on the 1st and 16th of each month; and
• effective June 16, 2006 – a ten year, $25 million interest rate swap at a fixed rate of 5.587% per
annum, variable rate adjusted on the 1st and 16th of each month.
We earn interest on all of the interest rate swaps at the one-month LIBOR rate. The one-month LIBOR
rate at December 31, 2006 was 5.32% per annum.
The fair value of our interest rate swap agreements represents the estimated receipts or payments that
would be made to terminate the agreements. These amounts are recorded as a component of floorplan
interest expense. The difference between interest earned and the interest obligation results in a monthly
settlement which is also recorded as a component of floorplan interest expense.
Additional interest expense, net of tax, on un-hedged debt as a result of changing interest rates, based on
interest rates effective as of January 1, 2004 was approximately $10.7 million, $4.5 million and $0.6
million, respectively, in 2006, 2005 and 2004. Interest expense, net of tax, on un-hedged debt increased
during 2006, 2005 and 2004 by approximately $2.1 million, $2.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively, as
a result of increasing interest rates during those periods. As of December 31, 2006, approximately 57% of
our total debt outstanding was subject to un-hedged variable rates of interest.
39
Based on current interest rates, we expect that our interest rate swaps will result in interest savings of
approximately $1.7 million in 2007.
Risk Management Policies
We assess interest rate cash flow risk by continually identifying and monitoring changes in interest rate
exposures that may adversely impact expected future cash flows and by evaluating hedging
opportunities.
We maintain risk management control systems to monitor interest rate cash flow attributable to both our
outstanding and forecasted debt obligations as well as our offsetting hedge positions. The risk
management control systems involve the use of analytical techniques, including cash flow sensitivity
analysis, to estimate the expected impact of changes in interest rates on our future cash flows.
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Financial Data
The financial statements and notes thereto required by this item begin on page F-1 as listed in Item 15 of
Part IV of this document. Quarterly financial data for each of the eight quarters in the two-year period
ended December 31, 2006 is included in Item 7.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our management evaluated, with the participation and under the supervision of our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the
end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on this evaluation, our Chief
Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
are effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to our management, including
our President and Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure and that such information is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a –15(f). Under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer,
we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on
the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on our evaluation under the framework in Internal
Control – Integrated Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial
reporting was effective as of December 31, 2006.
Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2006, as well as our consolidated financial statements, have been audited by KPMG LLP,
an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their reports, which are included herein.
40
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Other than as discussed below, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting
that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
During the fourth quarter of 2006 we took remediation actions to address our previously disclosed
material weakness in internal control over financial reporting with respect to adequate technical expertise
to ensure the proper application, at inception, of the criteria for the “short-cut” method within the
provisions of SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” for our
interest rate swaps. The changes in internal control over financial reporting included:
•
•
improving training and education and accounting reviews to ensure all relevant personnel
involved in derivative transactions understand and apply hedge accounting requirements in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles; and
ongoing monitoring and review controls to ensure the continuing qualification for hedge
accounting, including revising our documentation requirements for hedge accounting in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles with the assistance of outside experts,
as appropriate.
As a result, management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
has determined that these actions constitute a change in internal control over financial reporting that is
reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting. We believe these steps
have remediated the previously identified material weakness.
Item 9B. Other Information
None.
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
PART III
Information required by this item will be included under the captions Election of Directors, Meetings and
Committees of the Board of Directors, Audit Committee Financial Expert, Code of Ethics, Executive
Officers and Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance in our Proxy Statement for our
2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and, upon filing, is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this item will be included under the captions Compensation of Directors,
Compensation Committee Report, Compensation Discussion and Analysis, Executive Compensation,
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change-in-Control, and Compensation Committee Interlocks
and Insider Participation in our Proxy Statement for our 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and, upon
filing, is incorporated herein by reference.
41
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table summarizes equity securities authorized for issuance as of December 31, 2006.
Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights (a)
Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights (b)
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a) (c)
1,228,157
$20.23
1,948,590
-
1,228,157
-
$20.23
-
1,948,590(1)
Plan Category
Equity compensation
plans approved by
shareholders
Equity compensation
plans not approved by
shareholders
Total
(1)
Includes 1,191,990 shares available pursuant to our 2003 Stock Incentive Plan and 756,600 shares available pursuant to our
Employee Stock Purchase Plan.
The additional information required by this item will be included under the caption Security Ownership of
Certain Beneficial Owners and Management in our Proxy Statement for our 2007 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders and, upon filing, is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
The information required by this item will be included under the captions Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions and Director Independence in our Proxy Statement for our 2007 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders and, upon filing is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
Information required by this item will be included under the caption Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm in the Proxy Statement for our 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and, upon filing, is
incorporated herein by reference.
42
Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
PART IV
Financial Statements and Schedules
The Consolidated Financial Statements, together with the report thereon of KPMG LLP, are included on
the pages indicated below:
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2006 and 2005
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity and Comprehensive
Income for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
There are no schedules required to be filed herewith.
Page
F-1, F-2
F-3
F-4
F-5
F-6
F-7
Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed herewith and this list is intended to constitute the exhibit index. An asterisk
(*) beside the exhibit number indicates the exhibits containing a management contract, compensatory
plan or arrangement, which are required to be identified in this report.
Exhibit
3.1
3.2
4.1
4.2
Description
(a) Restated Articles of Incorporation of Lithia Motors, Inc., as amended May 13, 1999.
(b) Bylaws of Lithia Motors, Inc.
(b) Specimen Common Stock certificate
(j)
Indenture dated May 4, 2004, between Lithia Motors, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as
Trustee, relating to 2.875% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes due 2014.
10.1*
(b) 1996 Stock Incentive Plan
10.2*
(c) Amendment No. 1 to the Lithia Motors, Inc. 1996 Stock Incentive Plan
10.2.1*
(b) Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement (1)
10.3*
(b) Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement (1)
10.4*
(d) 1997 Non-Discretionary Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors
10.5*
10.6*
(l)
(f)
1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended
Lithia Motors, Inc. 2001 Stock Option Plan
10.6.1*
(g) Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement for 2001 Stock Option Plan
10.6.2*
(g) Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for 2001 Stock Option Plan
10.7.1*
(k) 2003 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated
10.7.2*
(k) Form of Restricted Share Grant for 2003 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended and restated
43
Exhibit
10.8*
Description
(k) Summary 2006 Discretionary Support Services Bonus Program
10.9
(a) Chrysler Corporation Sales and Service Agreement General Provisions
10.9.1
(h) Chrysler Corporation Chrysler Sales and Service Agreement, dated September 28, 1999, between
Chrysler Corporation and Lithia Chrysler Plymouth Jeep Eagle, Inc. (Additional Terms and Provisions
to the Sales and Service Agreements are in Exhibit 10.9) (2)
10.10
(b) Mercury Sales and Service Agreement General Provisions
10.10.1
(e) Supplemental Terms and Conditions agreement between Ford Motor Company and Lithia Motors, Inc.
dated June 12, 1997.
10.10.2
(e) Mercury Sales and Service Agreement, dated June 1, 1997, between Ford Motor Company and Lithia
TLM, LLC dba Lithia Lincoln Mercury (general provisions are in Exhibit 10.10) (3)
10.11
(e) Volkswagen Dealer Agreement Standard Provisions
10.11.1
(a) Volkswagen Dealer Agreement dated September 17, 1998, between Volkswagen of America, Inc. and
Lithia HPI, Inc. dba Lithia Volkswagen. (standard provisions are in Exhibit 10.11) (4)
10.12
(b) General Motors Dealer Sales and Service Agreement Standard Provisions
10.12.1
(a) Supplemental Agreement to General Motors Corporation Dealer Sales and Service Agreement dated
January 16, 1998.
10.12.2
(i) Chevrolet Dealer Sales and Service Agreement dated October 13, 1998 between General Motors
Corporation, Chevrolet Motor Division and Camp Automotive, Inc. (5)
10.13
(b) Toyota Dealer Agreement Standard Provisions
10.13.1
(a) Toyota Dealer Agreement, between Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. and Lithia Motors, Inc., dba Lithia
Toyota, dated February 15, 1996. (6)
10.14
(e) Nissan Standard Provisions
10.14.1
(a) Nissan Public Ownership Addendum dated August 30, 1999 (identical documents executed by each
Nissan store).
10.14.2
(e) Nissan Dealer Term Sales and Service Agreement between Lithia Motors, Inc., Lithia NF, Inc., and
the Nissan Division of Nissan Motor Corporation In USA dated January 2, 1998. (standard provisions
are in Exhibit 10.14) (7)
10.15
(a) Lease Agreement between CAR LIT, L.L.C. and Lithia Real Estate, Inc. relating to properties in
Medford, Oregon.(8)
10.16
(l)
2006 Board of Directors’ Compensation Package
10.17
(k) Form of Outside Director Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Agreement
21
23
31.1
Subsidiaries of Lithia Motors, Inc.
Consent of KPMG LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
44
Exhibit
31.2
32.1
32.2
Description
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934.
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(f)
(g)
(h)
(i)
(j)
(k)
(l)
Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2000.
Incorporated by reference from the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-1, Registration Statement No. 333-14031, as
declared effective by the Securities Exchange Commission on December 18, 1996.
Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1998 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on August 13, 1998.
Incorporated by reference from the Company's Registration Statement on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-45553, as
filed with the Securities Exchange Commission on February 4, 1998.
Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 31, 1998.
Incorporated by reference from Appendix B to the Company’s Proxy Statement for its 2001 Annual Meeting as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 8, 2001.
Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2001 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on February 22, 2002.
Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2001 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2001.
Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 31, 1999.
Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on May 10, 2004.
Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 8, 2006.
Incorporated by reference from the Company’s Form 8-K filed May 18, 2006.
(1) The board of directors adopted the new stock option agreement forms when it adopted the 2001 Stock Option Plan; and,
although no longer being used to grant new stock options, these option agreements remain in effect as there are outstanding
stock options issued under these stock option agreements.
(2) Substantially identical agreements exist between DaimlerChrysler Motor Company, LLC and those other subsidiaries operating
Dodge, Chrysler, Plymouth or Jeep dealerships.
(3) Substantially identical agreements exist for its Ford and Lincoln-Mercury lines between Ford Motor Company and those other
subsidiaries operating Ford or Lincoln-Mercury dealerships.
(4) Substantially identical agreements exist between Volkswagen of America, Inc. and those subsidiaries operating Volkswagen
dealerships.
(5) Substantially identical agreements exist between Chevrolet Motor Division, GM Corporation and those other subsidiaries
operating General Motors dealerships.
(6) Substantially identical agreements exist (except the terms are all 2 years) between Toyota Motor Sales, USA, Inc. and those
other subsidiaries operating Toyota dealerships.
(7) Substantially identical agreements exist between Nissan Motor Corporation and those other subsidiaries operating Nissan
dealerships.
(8) Lithia Real Estate, Inc. leases all the property in Medford, Oregon sold to CAR LIT, LLC under substantially identical leases
covering six separate blocks of property.
45
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
Date: March 8, 2007
LITHIA MOTORS, INC.
By /s/ SIDNEY B. DEBOER
Sidney B. DeBoer
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below
by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 8, 2007:
Signature
Title
/s/ SIDNEY B. DEBOER
Sidney B. DeBoer
Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ JEFFREY B. DEBOER
Jeffrey B. DeBoer
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ LINDA A. GANIM Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
Linda A. Ganim
(Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ M. L. DICK HEIMANN
M. L. Dick Heimann
/s/ THOMAS BECKER
Thomas Becker
/s/ MARYANN KELLER
Maryann Keller
/s/ GERALD F. TAYLOR
Gerald F. Taylor
/s/ WILLIAM J. YOUNG
William J. Young
Vice Chairman
Director
Director
Director
Director
46
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Lithia Motors, Inc. and Subsidiaries:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Lithia Motors, Inc. and subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in
stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year
period ended December 31, 2006. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of Lithia Motors, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005,
and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note 1 of the consolidated financial statements, effective January 1, 2006, the Company
adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), Share-
Based Payment.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the effectiveness of Lithia Motors, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as
of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated
March 6, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on management’s assessment of, and the effective
operation of, internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Portland, Oregon
March 6, 2007
F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
Lithia Motors, Inc. and Subsidiaries:
We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting, that Lithia Motors, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Lithia Motors, Inc.’s
management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of
the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included
obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management's assessment, testing
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as
we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.
In our opinion, management’s assessment that Lithia Motors, Inc. maintained effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on criteria established in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO). Also, in our opinion, Lithia Motors, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States), the consolidated balance sheets of Lithia Motors, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and 2005,
and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity and comprehensive income
and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2006, and our report dated March
6, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
/s/ KPMG LLP
Portland, Oregon
March 6, 2007
F-2
LITHIA MOTORS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands)
Assets
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Contracts in transit
Trade receivables, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $390 and $406
Inventories, net
Vehicles leased to others, current portion
Prepaid expenses and other
Deferred income taxes
Assets held for sale
Total Current Assets
Land and buildings, net of accumulated
depreciation of $15,953 and $11,358
Equipment and other, net of accumulated
depreciation of $38,866 and $31,622
Goodwill
Other intangible assets, net of accumulated
amortization of $129 and $89
Other non-current assets
Total Assets
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current Liabilities:
Floorplan notes payable
Floorplan notes payable: non-trade
Current maturities of long-term debt
Trade payables
Accrued liabilities
Liabilities held for sale
Total Current Liabilities
Used vehicle flooring
Real estate debt, less current maturities
Other long-term debt, less current maturities
Other long-term liabilities
Deferred income taxes
Total Liabilities
Stockholders' Equity:
Preferred stock - no par value; authorized
15,000 shares; none outstanding
Class A common stock - no par value;
authorized 100,000 shares; issued and
outstanding 15,789 and 15,629
Class B common stock - no par value
authorized 25,000 shares; issued and
outstanding 3,762 and 3,762
Additional paid-in capital
Unearned compensation
Retained earnings
Total Stockholders' Equity
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
December 31,
2006
2005
$
26,600
56,211
$
62,317
603,306
7,698
6,825
1,198
15,485
779,640
327,890
89,213
307,424
69,054
6,136
1,579,357
422,411
77,268
16,557
39,794
62,299
11,610
629,939
95,614
155,890
140,879
13,509
50,133
1,085,964
$
$
$
$
48,566
52,453
53,990
606,047
6,296
8,800
685
27,411
804,248
255,372
77,805
260,899
50,247
4,143
1,452,714
476,322
54,130
6,868
30,917
57,177
22,388
647,802
-
154,046
136,505
10,440
43,690
992,483
-
-
226,670
224,775
468
5,574
-
260,681
493,393
1,579,357
$
$
468
2,559
(1,132)
233,561
460,231
1,452,714
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
LITHIA MOTORS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Revenues:
New vehicle sales
Used vehicle sales
Finance and insurance
Service, body and parts
Fleet and other
Total revenues
Cost of sales
Gross profit
Selling, general and administrative
Depreciation - buildings
Depreciation and amortization - other
Income from continuing operations
Other income (expense):
Floorplan interest expense
Other interest expense
Other income, net
Income from continuing operations before
income taxes
Income taxes
Income from continuing operations
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income
tax benefit of $1,958, $1,542 and $558
Net income
Basic income per share from continuing operations
Basic loss per share from discontinued operations
Basic net income per share
Shares used in basic per share calculations
Diluted income per share from continuing operations
Diluted loss per share from discontinued operations
Diluted net income per share
Year Ended December 31,
2005
2004
2006
1,841,463
862,397
119,936
343,747
5,351
3,172,894
2,634,417
538,477
406,569
4,600
12,471
114,837
(34,636)
(15,453)
958
(49,131)
65,706
(25,369)
40,337
(3,033)
37,304
2.07
(0.16)
1.91
19,485
1.91
(0.14)
1.77
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,631,316
805,448
107,564
302,960
4,410
2,851,698
2,359,999
491,699
357,617
3,690
10,285
120,107
(17,580)
(11,891)
953
(28,518)
91,589
(35,610)
55,979
(2,352)
53,627
2.92
(0.12)
2.80
19,175
2.65
(0.11)
2.54
$
$
$
$
$
$
1,495,442
726,544
94,991
273,630
7,679
2,598,286
2,163,585
434,701
326,168
2,716
9,775
96,042
(12,221)
(8,667)
739
(20,149)
75,893
(29,397)
46,496
(884)
45,612
2.48
(0.05)
2.43
18,773
2.31
(0.04)
2.27
$
$
$
$
$
$
Shares used in diluted per share calculations
22,102
21,807
20,647
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
LITHIA MOTORS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity and Comprehensive Income
For the years ended December 31, 2004, 2005 and 2006
(In thousands)
Common Stock
Class A
Class B
Shares
14,693
-
Amount
208,189
$
-
Shares
3,762
-
$
Amount
468
-
$
Additional
Paid In
Capital
1,231
-
$
Balance at December 31, 2003
Net income
Issuance of stock in connection with
employee stock plans
Repurchase of Class A common stock
Compensation for stock option issuances
and tax benefits from option exercises
Dividends paid
Balance at December 31, 2004
Net income
Issuance of stock in connection with employee
stock plans
Issuance of restricted stock to employees
Amortization of unearned compensation
Shares forfeited by employees
Repurchase of Class A common stock
Compensation for stock and stock option issuances
and tax benefits from option exercises
Dividends paid
Balance at December 31, 2005
Net income
Issuance of stock in connection with employee
stock plans
Issuance of restricted stock to employees
Reversal of unearned compensation upon adoption
of SFAS No. 123R
Shares forfeited by employees
Repurchase of Class A common stock
Compensation for stock and stock option issuances
and tax benefits from option exercises
Dividends paid
Balance at December 31, 2006
450
(1)
7,159
(13)
-
-
-
-
15,142
-
-
-
215,335
-
-
-
3,762
-
434
60
-
(10)
-
7,992
1,645
-
(272)
(10)
-
-
-
3
-
15,629
-
85
-
224,775
-
-
-
3,762
-
-
-
-
-
-
299
73
-
(15)
(197)
-
-
15,789
6,844
-
(1,132)
-
(4,720)
903
-
$
226,670
Unearned
Retained
Compensation Earnings
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(1,645)
241
272
-
-
-
(1,132)
-
-
-
1,132
-
-
$
147,654
45,612
$
-
-
-
(5,634)
187,632
53,627
-
-
-
-
-
-
(7,698)
233,561
37,304
-
-
-
-
-
Total
Stock-
holders'
Equity
357,542
45,612
7,159
(13)
580
(5,634)
405,246
53,627
7,992
-
241
-
(10)
833
(7,698)
460,231
37,304
6,844
-
(134)
-
(4,720)
-
-
-
-
468
-
-
-
-
-
-
468
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
580
-
1,811
-
-
-
-
748
-
2,559
-
-
-
(134)
-
-
-
-
3,762
$
-
-
468
$
3,149
-
5,574
$
-
-
-
-
(10,184)
260,681
$
4,052
(10,184)
493,393
$
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
LITHIA MOTORS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization
Amortization of debt discount
Depreciation and amortization from discontinued operations
Stock-based compensation
Loss on sale of assets
Loss (gain) on sale of franchise
Deferred income taxes
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements
Decrease (increase), net of effect of acquisitions:
Trade and installment contract receivables, net
Contracts in transit
Inventories
Vehicles leased to others
Prepaid expenses and other
Other non-current assets
Increase (decrease), net of effect of acquisitions:
Floorplan notes payable
Trade payables
Accrued liabilities
Other long-term liabilities and deferred revenue
Net cash provided by operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities:
Principal payments received on notes receivable
Capital expenditures:
Non-financeable
Financeable
Proceeds from sale of assets
Cash paid for acquisitions, net of cash acquired
Proceeds from sale of dealerships
Net cash used in investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities:
Floorplan notes payable: non-trade
Net borrowings (repayments) on lines of credit
Principal payments on long-term debt and capital leases
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
Debt issuance costs
Repurchase of common stock
Proceeds from issuance of common stock
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements
Dividends paid
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for interest
Cash paid during the period for income taxes
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing
activities:
Debt issued in connection with acquisitions
Floorplan debt assumed in connection with acquisitions
Acquisition of capital lease
Assets acquired with debt
Debt paid by purchaser in connection with dealership disposals
Floorplan debt paid in connection with dealership disposals
Common stock received for the exercise price of stock options
2006
Year Ended December 31,
2005
2004
$
37,304
$
53,627
$
45,612
17,071
145
252
3,534
193
911
6,312
(369)
(8,137)
(3,758)
45,360
(2,701)
2,158
(1,993)
(75,041)
8,839
4,415
3,444
37,939
-
(28,690)
(45,009)
512
(105,505)
3,915
(174,777)
16,005
94,000
(9,008)
21,566
-
(4,720)
6,844
369
(10,184)
114,872
(21,966)
13,975
-
523
490
525
(28)
5,286
-
(11,864)
(9,540)
(60,474)
(1,633)
(1,682)
909
71,772
4,117
7,026
(411)
72,618
-
(21,093)
(32,196)
11,652
(51,713)
6,696
(86,654)
3,354
9,314
(7,454)
28,233
-
(10)
7,994
-
(7,698)
33,733
19,697
$
$
$
48,566
26,600
$
28,869
48,566
$
$
$
49,779
17,697
6,822
48,450
102
-
-
19,407
-
$
$
35,318
23,463
-
39,542
-
-
6,550
25,554
428
12,491
-
652
240
889
(883)
10,939
-
1,175
1,796
(28,656)
(846)
(1,493)
(2,441)
25,663
2,245
7,342
2,393
77,118
585
(13,156)
(40,931)
2,124
(79,395)
8,756
(122,017)
(7,782)
(120,332)
(13,326)
142,279
(2,550)
(13)
7,083
-
(5,634)
(275)
(45,174)
74,043
28,869
25,499
18,775
12,000
51,884
540
3,680
-
8,975
-
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
LITHIA MOTORS, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1)
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Organization and Business
We are a leading operator of automotive franchises and retailer of new and used vehicles and
services. As of December 31, 2006, we offered 26 brands of new vehicles through 187 franchises in 104
stores in the Western United States and over the Internet. As of December 31, 2006, we operated 16
stores in Oregon, 15 in California, 14 in Texas, 12 in Washington, 7 in Idaho, 7 in Colorado, 7 in Alaska, 7
in Montana, 6 in Nevada, 4 in Iowa, 3 in Nebraska, 2 in South Dakota, 2 in North Dakota, 1 in New
Mexico and 1 in Wisconsin. We sell new and used cars and light trucks; sell replacement parts; provide
vehicle maintenance, warranty, paint and repair services; and arrange related financing, service
contracts, protection products and credit insurance for our automotive customers.
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying financial statements reflect the results of operations, the financial position and
the cash flows for Lithia Motors, Inc. and its directly and indirectly wholly-owned subsidiaries. All
significant intercompany accounts and transactions, consisting principally of intercompany sales, have
been eliminated upon consolidation.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents are defined as cash on hand and cash in bank accounts.
Contracts in Transit
Contracts in transit relate to amounts due from various lenders for the financing of vehicles sold
and are typically received within five days of selling a vehicle.
Trade Receivables
Trade receivables include amounts due from the following:
•
•
•
from customers for vehicles and service and parts business;
from manufacturers for factory rebates, dealer incentives and warranty reimbursement; and
from insurance companies, finance companies and other miscellaneous receivables.
Receivables are recorded at invoice cost and do not bear interest until such time as they are 60
days past due. Reserves for uncollectible accounts are estimated based on our historical write-off
experience and are reviewed on a monthly basis. Account balances are charged off against the reserve
after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote.
We do not have any off-balance sheet credit exposure related to our customers. A rollforward of our
allowance for doubtful accounts was as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
Balance, beginning of period
Bad debt expense
Write-offs
Recoveries
Balance, end of period
2006
406
1,088
(2,623)
1,519
390
$
$
2005
436
750
(1,796)
1,016
406
$
$
2004
462
613
(1,356)
717
436
$
$
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of market value or cost, using the specific identification
method for vehicles and parts. The cost of new and used vehicle inventories includes the cost of any
equipment added, reconditioning and transportation.
F-7
Vehicles Leased to Others and Related Leases Receivable
Vehicles leased to others are stated at cost and depreciated over their estimated useful lives
(5 years) on a straight-line basis. Lease receivables result from customer, employee and fleet leases of
vehicles under agreements that qualify as operating leases. Leases are cancelable at the option of the
lessee after providing 30 days written notice. Vehicles leased to others are classified as current or non-
current based on the remaining lease term.
Assets Held for Sale
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, assets held for sale of $15.5 million and $27.4 million,
respectively, related to dealerships held for sale and were recorded on our balance sheet at the lower of
book value or estimated fair market value, less applicable selling costs. See also Note 18.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost and are being depreciated over their estimated
useful lives, on the straight-line basis. The range of estimated useful lives is as follows:
Buildings and improvements
Service equipment
Furniture, signs and fixtures
40 years
5 to 10 years
5 to 10 years
The cost for maintenance, repairs and minor renewals is expensed as incurred, while significant
renewals and betterments are capitalized. In addition, interest on borrowings for major capital projects,
significant renewals and betterments are capitalized. Capitalized interest becomes a part of the cost of
the depreciable asset and is depreciated according to the estimated useful lives as previously stated.
Capitalized interest totaled $1.5 million, $0.9 million and $0.5 million, respectively, in 2006, 2005 and
2004.
When an asset is retired or otherwise disposed of, the related cost and accumulated depreciation
are removed from the accounts, and any gain or loss is credited or charged to income.
Leased property meeting certain criteria is capitalized and the present value of the related lease
payments is recorded as a liability. Amortization of capitalized leased assets is computed on a straight-
line basis over the term of the lease, unless the lease transfers title or it contains a bargain purchase
option, at which time, it is amortized over the useful life, and is included in depreciation expense.
Leases
We lease certain of our facilities under non-cancelable operating leases. These leases expire at
increases at
various dates
lease commitments contain
predetermined intervals over the life of the lease, while other lease commitments are subject to escalation
clauses of an amount equal to the increase in the cost of living based on the “Consumer Price Index -
U.S. Cities Average - All Items for all Urban Consumers” published by the U.S. Department of Labor.
Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the life of the lease.
through 2066. Certain
fixed payment
Leasehold improvements made at the inception of the lease or during the term of the lease are
amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the life of the improvement or the remaining term of
the lease.
Long-Lived Asset Impairment
Long-lived assets held and used by us and intangible assets with determinable lives are reviewed
for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of assets may not be
recoverable in accordance with SFAS No. 144 “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets.” We evaluate recoverability of assets to be held and used by comparing the carrying amount of
an asset to future net undiscounted cash flows, including possible disposition, to be generated by the
asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured as the
amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Such reviews
assess the fair value of the assets based upon estimates of future cash flows that the assets are
expected to generate.
F-8
Long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale are valued at the lower of book value or fair value
less cost to sell. We did not record any long-lived asset impairments in 2006, 2005 or 2004.
Goodwill and Other Identifiable Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess purchase price over fair value of net assets acquired, which is not
allocable to separately identifiable intangible assets. Other identifiable intangible assets represent the
franchise value of stores acquired since July 1, 2001, non-compete agreements and customer lists. Non-
compete agreements are amortized using the straight-line method over the contractual life of the
agreement and customer lists are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated lives of
approximately five years. Except for our non-compete agreements and customer lists, all of our other
identifiable intangible assets have indefinite useful lives. We determined that our franchise agreements
have indefinite useful lives based on the following:
• Certain of our franchise agreements continue indefinitely by their terms;
• Certain of our franchise agreements have limited terms, but are routinely renewed without
•
substantial cost to us;
In the established retail automotive franchise industry, we are not aware of manufacturers
terminating franchise agreements against the wishes of the franchise owners, except under
extraordinary circumstances, and we have never had a franchise agreement terminated
against our wishes. A manufacturer may pressure a franchise owner to sell a franchise when
they are in breach of the franchise agreement over an extended period of time. The franchise
owner is typically able to sell the franchise for market value.
• State dealership franchise laws typically limit the rights of the manufacturer to terminate or
not renew a franchise unless there has been illegal activity on the part of the franchise owner;
• We are not aware of any legislation or other factors that would materially change the retail
automotive franchise system; and
• As evidenced by our acquisition history, there is an active market for automotive dealership
franchises within the United States. We attribute value to the franchise agreements acquired
with the dealerships we purchase based on the understanding and industry practice that the
franchise agreements will be renewed indefinitely by the manufacturer.
Accordingly, we have determined that our franchise agreements will continue to contribute to our
cash flows indefinitely and, therefore, have indefinite lives.
Pursuant to SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” goodwill and other identifiable
intangible assets with indefinite useful lives are not amortized, but tested for impairment, at least annually,
in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142. The impairment test is a two step process. The first
identifies potential impairments by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its book value,
including goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets. We have determined that we operate as one
reporting unit. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds the carrying amount, goodwill and other
identifiable intangible assets are not impaired and the second step is not necessary. If the carrying value
exceeds the fair value, the second step includes determining the implied fair value through further market
research. The implied fair value of goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets is then compared with
the carrying amount to determine if an impairment loss is recorded.
We tested our goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets for impairment utilizing the
discounted cash flows method in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 142 as of December 31,
2006 and determined that no impairment losses were required to be recognized. Growth rates utilized in
the calculation were derived from the U.S. Census Bureau on population growth and the U.S. Department
of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics for historical consumer price index data. The discount rate applied to
the future cash flows was derived from a hybrid capital asset pricing model, which factors in an equity risk
premium and a risk free rate combined with a weighted average cost of capital model.
F-9
Unearned Compensation
Unearned compensation at December 31, 2005 included the value of restricted stock issued to
employees for which vesting provisions had not yet been met. Our unearned compensation balance of
$1.1 million as of December 31, 2005, which was accounted for under Accounting Principles Board
(“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” was reclassified into our Class A
common stock upon the adoptions of SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment.”
Incentives, Credits and Floor Plan Assistance
Manufacturers reimburse us for holdbacks, floor plan interest and advertising credits, which are earned
when each vehicle is purchased by us. The manufacturers reimburse us weekly, monthly or quarterly
depending on the manufacturer and the type of program. The manufacturers determine the amount of the
reimbursements based on many factors including the value and make of the vehicles purchased.
Pursuant to EITF 02-16 “Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Certain Consideration
Received from a Vendor,” we recognize advertising credits, floorplan interest credits, holdbacks, cash
incentives and other rebates received from manufacturers that are tied to specific vehicles as a reduction
to cost of goods sold as the related vehicles are sold. When amounts are received prior to the sale of the
vehicle, such amounts are netted against inventory until the vehicle is sold.
We earn certain other cash incentives and rebates from the manufacturer when the vehicles are
sold to the customer. The amount of cash incentives and other rebates can vary based on the type and
number of models sold.
Advertising credits that are not tied to specific vehicles are earned from the manufacturer when
we submit reimbursement for qualifying advertising expenditures and are recognized as a reduction of
advertising expense upon manufacturer confirmation that our submitted expenditures qualify for such
credits.
Parts purchase discounts that we receive from the manufacturer are earned when certain parts or
volume of parts are purchased from the manufacturer and are recognized as a reduction to cost of good
sold as the related inventory is sold.
Advertising
We expense production and other costs of advertising as incurred as a component of selling,
general and administrative expense. Advertising expense, net of manufacturer cooperative advertising
credits of $6.6 million, $5.2 million and $6.3 million, was $20.7 million, $18.7 million and $16.8 million for
the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively.
Environmental Liabilities and Expenditures
Accruals for environmental matters, if any, are recorded in operating expenses when it is
probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated.
Accrued liabilities are exclusive of claims against third parties and are not discounted.
In general, on going costs related to environmental remediation are charged to expense.
Environmental costs are capitalized if such costs increase the value of the property and/or mitigate or
prevent contamination from future operations.
We are aware of limited contamination at certain of our current and former facilities, and are in
the process of conducting investigations and/or remediation at some of these properties. Based on our
current information, we do not believe that any costs or liabilities relating to such contamination, other
environmental matters or compliance with environmental regulations will have a material adverse effect
on our cash flows, results of operations or financial condition. There can be no assurances, however, that
additional environmental matters will not arise or that new conditions or facts will not develop in the future
at our current or formerly owned or operated facilities, or at sites that we may acquire in the future, that
will result in a material adverse effect on our cash flows, results of operations or financial condition.
F-10
Income Taxes
Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method as prescribed by SFAS No.
109 “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax
consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing
assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable
income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The
effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period
that includes the enactment date.
Computation of Per Share Amounts
Following is a reconciliation of the income from continuing operations and weighted average
shares used for our basic earnings per share (“EPS”) and diluted EPS (in thousands, except per share
amounts).
Year Ended December 31,
2006
Income
from
Continuing
Operations
Per
Share
Amount
Shares
2005
Income
from
Continuing
Operations
Per
Share
Amount
Shares
2004
Income
from
Continuing
Operations
Per
Share
Amount
Shares
Basic EPS
Income from continuing
operations available to
common stockholders
Effect of Dilutive Securities
2 7/8% convertible senior
subordinated notes
Stock options and unvested
restricted stock
Diluted EPS
Income from continuing
operations available to
common stockholders
Antidilutive Securities
Shares issuable pursuant to
stock options not included
since they were antidilutive
$40,337
19,485
$2.07
$55,979
19,175
$2.92
$46,496
18,773
$2.48
1,896
2,255
(0.12)
1,845
2,255
(0.21)
1,231
1,485
(0.12)
-
362
(0.04)
-
377
(0.06)
-
389
(0.05)
$42,233
22,102
$1.91
$57,824
21,807
$2.65
$47,727
20,647
$2.31
356
272
324
Concentrations of Risk
Concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited due to the large number
of customers comprising our customer base. Receivables from all manufacturers accounted for 17.2%
and 22.1%, respectively, of total accounts receivable at December 31, 2006 and 2005. Included in the
17.2% is one manufacturer who accounted for 9.7% of the total accounts receivable balance at
December 31, 2006. Included in the 22.1% is one manufacturer who accounted for 11.9% of the total
accounts receivable balance at December 31, 2005.
In addition, in 2006, 2005 and 2004, 35.2%, 34.7% and 35.2%, respectively, of our total revenue
was derived from the sale of new vehicles from two manufacturers. In addition, historically approximately
70% of our new vehicle revenue is derived from domestic manufacturers. Any unusual event or economic
slow-down in our domestic vehicle sales could impact our revenue mix significantly.
Financial instruments, which potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk, consist
principally of cash deposits. We generally are exposed to credit risk from balances on deposit in financial
institutions in excess of the FDIC-insured limit.
Financial Instruments and Market Risks
The carrying amount of cash equivalents, contracts in transit, trade receivables, trade payables,
accrued liabilities and short-term borrowings approximates fair value because of the short-term nature of
these instruments.
Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information
about the financial instrument. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and
matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in
assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.
F-11
We have variable rate floor plan notes payable and other credit line borrowings that subject us to
market risk exposure. At December 31, 2006 we had $643.7 million outstanding under such facilities at
interest rates ranging from 6.47% to 7.50% per annum, $499.7 million of which was outstanding under
our floorplan facilities. An increase or decrease in the interest rates would affect interest expense for the
period accordingly.
The fair market value of long-term fixed interest rate debt is subject to interest rate risk.
Generally, the fair market value of fixed interest rate debt will increase as interest rates fall and decrease
as interest rates rise. If we refinanced at market rates in effect at December 31, 2006, we would pay an
additional $5.4 million in interest expense over the remaining lives, which is represented in the table
below as the difference between book value and fair value at December 31, 2006. The interest rate
changes affect the fair market value but do not impact earnings or cash flows. We monitor our fixed rate
debt regularly, refinancing debt that is materially above market rates. The book value of our fixed rate
debt and the fair value, based upon open market trades or on discounted cash flows, was as follows at
December 31, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands):
December 31,
Book value of fixed rate debt
Fair value of fixed rate debt
2006
218,943
213,549
2005
200,446
195,645
$
$
$
$
We are also subjected to credit risk and market risk by entering into interest rate swaps. See
below and also Note 7. We minimize the credit or repayment risk on our derivative instruments by
entering into transactions with institutions whose credit rating is higher than Aa.
Derivative Financial Instruments
We enter into interest rate swap agreements to reduce our exposure to market risks from
changing interest rates on our new vehicle floorplan lines of credit. The difference between interest paid
and interest received, which may change as market interest rates change, is accrued and recognized as
either additional floorplan interest expense, or a reduction thereof.
We account for our derivative financial instruments in accordance with SFAS No. 133,
“Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” as amended by SFAS No. 138,
“Accounting for Certain Derivative Instruments and Certain Hedging Activities-an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 133” and SFAS No. 137, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”
(collectively, “the Standards”). The Standards require that all derivative instruments (including certain
derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) be recorded on the balance sheet as either an asset
or liability measured at its fair value, and that changes in the derivatives fair value be recognized currently
in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. See also Note 7.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and related notes to financial
statements. Changes in such estimates may affect amounts reported in future periods.
Estimates are used in the calculation of certain reserves maintained for charge backs on
estimated cancellations of service contracts, life, accident and disability insurance policies, and finance
fees from financial institutions. We also use estimates in the calculation of various expenses, accruals
and reserves including anticipated workers compensation premium expenses related to a retrospective
cost policy, estimated uncollectible accounts and notes receivable, discretionary employee bonus,
environmental matters, warranty claims for our used vehicles, gross profit on service work performed on
vehicles in inventory, estimate of revenue recognition on discounts received on parts inventory and stock-
based compensation. We also make certain estimates regarding the assessment of the recoverability of
goodwill and other intangible assets.
F-12
Revenue Recognition
Revenue from the sale of vehicles is recognized upon delivery, when the sales contract is signed,
down payment has been received and funding has been approved from the lending agent. Fleet sales of
vehicles whereby we do not take possession of the vehicles are shown on a net basis in fleet and other
revenue.
Revenue from parts and service is recognized upon delivery of the parts or service to the
customer.
Finance fees earned for notes placed with financial institutions in connection with customer
vehicle financing are recognized, net of estimated charge-backs, as finance and insurance revenue upon
acceptance of the credit by the financial institution.
Insurance income from third party insurance companies for commissions earned on credit life,
accident and disability insurance policies sold in connection with the sale of a vehicle are recognized, net
of anticipated cancellations, as finance and insurance revenue upon execution of the insurance contract.
Commissions from third party service contracts are recognized, net of anticipated cancellations,
as finance and insurance revenue upon sale of the contracts.
We may also participate in future underwriting profit, pursuant to retrospective commission
arrangements, that would be recognized as income upon receipt.
Sales Returns
As is typical in the automotive retailing industry, we do not allow for sales returns for our new or
used vehicle sales, and have therefore not provided for an allowance for new or used vehicle sales
returns. Vehicle sales are typically considered final when the vehicle is sold; however, there is a small
percentage of vehicle sales where we experience a return of the vehicle after the sale. Also, in some of
our stores, in connection with the implementation of our Assured Used Vehicle program, we are allowing
customers a 3-day or 500 mile right of return on used vehicles as part of a this program to increase
customer satisfaction. We have estimated the amount of vehicle returns using historical experience. We
allow for customer returns on sales of our parts inventory up to 30 days after the sale. Most parts returns
generally occur within one to two weeks from the time of sale, and are not significant. We have not
provided for an allowance for parts sales returns.
Legal Costs
We are a party to numerous legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. We
accrue for certain legal costs and potential settlement claims related to various proceedings that are
estimable and probable in accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies.”
Debt Issuance Costs and Loan Origination Fees
Debt issuance costs and loan origination fees paid, including incremental direct costs of
completed loan agreements, are deferred and amortized over the life of the debt to which it relates and
are shown as an increase to the related interest expense.
Warranty
We offer a 60-day limited warranty on the sale of retail used vehicles. We estimate our warranty
liability based on the number of vehicles sold and an estimated claim cost per vehicle based on past
experience. Each year, we analyze the warranty charges related to our used vehicle sales and update our
per used vehicle warranty estimate. The estimated warranty is added to cost of sales upon sale of the
related vehicle. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, accrued warranty totaled $215,000 and $176,000,
respectively, and is included in other current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. A roll-forward
of our warranty liability for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was as follows (in
thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
Balance, beginning of period
Warranties issued
Reductions for warranty payments made
Adjustments and changes in estimates
Balance, end of period
2006
176
2,494
(3,025)
570
215
$
$
2005
198
2,429
(2,434)
(17)
176
$
$
$
$
2004
220
2,574
(2,562)
(34)
198
F-13
Comprehensive Income
There was no difference between net income and comprehensive income in 2006, 2005 or 2004.
Major Supplier and Franchise Agreements
We purchase substantially all of our new vehicles and inventory from various manufacturers at
the prevailing prices charged by auto makers to all franchised dealers. Our overall sales could be
impacted by the auto manufacturers’ inability or unwillingness to supply the dealership with an adequate
supply of popular models.
We enter into agreements (the “Franchise Agreements”) with the manufacturers. The Franchise
Agreements generally limit the location of the dealership and provide the auto manufacturer approval
rights over changes in dealership management and ownership. The auto manufacturers are also entitled
to terminate the Franchise Agreements if the dealership is in material breach of the terms. Our ability to
expand operations depends, in part, on obtaining consents of the manufacturers for the acquisition of
additional dealerships. See also “Goodwill and Other Identifiable Intangible Assets” above.
Stock-Based Compensation
Effective January 1, 2006, we adopted SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment,” which
establishes accounting for equity instruments exchanged for employee services. Under the provisions of
SFAS No. 123R, stock-based compensation cost for equity classified awards is measured at the grant
date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the employee’s
requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the equity award). Prior to January 1, 2006, we
accounted for share-based compensation to employees in accordance with APB Opinion No. 25,
“Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” (“APB 25”) and related interpretations. We also followed the
fair value disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.”
We have elected to adopt the modified prospective transition method as provided by SFAS No.
123R and, accordingly, financial statement amounts for the prior periods presented in this Form 10-K
have not been restated to reflect the fair value method of expensing stock-based compensation. Under
this method, the provisions of SFAS No. 123R apply to all awards granted or modified after the date of
adoption, as well as to the unrecognized expense of awards not yet vested at the date of adoption. Such
expense will be recognized as compensation expense in the periods after the date of adoption using the
Black-Scholes valuation method over the remainder of the requisite service period. Our unearned
compensation balance of $1.1 million as of December 31, 2005, which was accounted for under APB 25,
was reclassified into our Class A common stock upon the adoptions of SFAS No. 123R. The cumulative
effect of the change in accounting principle from APB 25 to SFAS No. 123R was not material.
Disclosure of net income and earnings per share as if the fair value method prescribed by
in measuring
SFAS No. 123, “Accounting
compensation expense in prior periods is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
for Stock-Based Compensation,” had been applied
Year Ended December 31,
Net income, as reported
Add - Stock-based employee compensation expense included in
reported net income, net of related tax effects
-
Deduct
total stock-based employee compensation expense
determined under the fair value based method for all awards, net of
related tax effects
Net income, pro forma
Basic net income per share:
As reported
Pro forma
Diluted net income per share:
As reported
Pro forma
2005
53,627
303
(2,480)
51,450
2.80
2.68
2.54
2.44
$
$
$
$
$
$
2004
45,612
148
(3,313)
42,447
2.43
2.26
2.27
2.13
$
$
$
$
$
$
Segment Reporting
Based upon definitions contained within SFAS No. 131 “Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information,” we have determined that we operate in one segment, automotive
retailing.
F-14
Reclassifications
Prior period results have been reclassified for the results of operations for dealerships that were
transferred from continuing operations to discontinued operations during the current year.
In addition, in order to maintain consistency and comparability between periods, certain other
immaterial amounts in our consolidated financial statements have been reclassified from previously
reported balances to conform to the current year presentation.
(2)
Trade Receivables
Trade receivables consisted of the following (in thousands):
December 31,
Trade receivables
Vehicle receivables
Manufacturer receivables
Other
Less: Allowances
Total receivables, net
2006
14,086
25,427
20,446
2,748
62,707
(390)
62,317
$
$
2005
13,198
14,906
23,569
2,723
54,396
(406)
53,990
$
$
Vehicle receivables represent receivables from financial institutions for the portion of the vehicle
sales price financed by the customer.
(3)
Inventories and Related Notes Payable
The new and used vehicle inventory, collateralizing related notes payable, and other inventory
were as follows (in thousands):
December 31,
New and program vehicles
Used vehicles
Parts and accessories
Total inventories
2006
Inventory
Cost
466,703
103,857
32,746
603,306
$
$
$
$
Notes
Payable
499,679
-
-
499,679
2005
Inventory
Cost
491,486
87,853
26,708
606,047
$
$
Notes
Payable
530,452
-
-
530,452
$
$
The inventory balance is generally reduced by manufacturer holdbacks and incentives, while the
related floorplan notes payable are reflective of the gross cost of the vehicle. The floorplan notes payable,
as shown in the above table, will generally also be higher than the inventory cost due to the timing of the
sale of a vehicle and payment of the related liability.
All new vehicles are pledged to collateralize floor plan notes payable to floorplan providers. The
floorplan notes payable bear interest, payable monthly on the outstanding balance, at a rate of interest
that varies by provider. The new vehicle floorplan notes are payable on demand and are typically paid
upon the sale of the related vehicle. As such, these floorplan notes payable are shown as current
liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Ford Motor Credit, General Motors Acceptance Corporation (“GMAC”), Volkswagen Credit and
BMW Financial Services NA, LLC have agreed to floor all of our new vehicles for their respective brands
with DaimlerChrysler Financial Services Americas LLC and Toyota Motor Credit Corporation serving as
the primary lenders for substantially all other brands. These new vehicle lines are secured by new vehicle
inventory of the relevant brands. Vehicles financed by lenders not directly associated with the
manufacturer are classified as floorplan notes payable: non-trade and are included as a financing activity
in our statements of cash flows. Vehicles financed by lenders directly associated with the manufacturer
are classified as floorplan notes payable and are included as an operating activity in our statements of
cash flows.
F-15
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, used vehicles and parts and accessories inventory were
pledged to collateralize our working capital, acquisition and used vehicle flooring credit facility.
On November 30, 2006, General Motors (“GM”) completed the sale of a majority equity stake in
GMAC to an investment consortium. Although GMAC will continue to be the exclusive provider of GM
financial products and services and continues to have the relationships with GM, a majority equity stake
in GMAC has been sold to an independent third-party and GM has indicated in its public filings that it no
longer controls the GMAC entity. As a result, we will be treating new vehicles financed by GMAC after
the change in ownership control as floorplan notes payable: non-trade and related changes as a financing
activity in our statements of cash flows. Vehicles financed prior to this change in control will continue to
be classified as floorplan notes payable: trade, with related changes reflected as operating activities in
our statements of cash flows, since these GMAC vehicle financings occurred while GM retained control of
GMAC as its captive finance subsidiary.
(4)
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following (in thousands):
December 31,
Buildings and improvements
Service equipment
Furniture, signs and fixtures
Less accumulated depreciation – buildings
Less accumulated depreciation – equipment and other
Land
Construction in progress, buildings
Construction in progress, other
(5)
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
The roll-forward of goodwill was as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
Balance, beginning of year
Goodwill acquired and post acquisition adjustments
Goodwill included in assets held for sale
Goodwill included in gain or loss on disposal of franchises
and discontinued operations
Balance, end of year
2006
187,747
34,424
91,174
313,345
(15,953)
(38,866)
258,526
148,773
7,323
2,481
417,103
2006
260,899
47,169
(367)
$
$
$
2005
150,916
29,152
79,453
259,521
(11,358)
(31,622)
216,541
109,464
6,350
822
333,177
2005
244,532
21,865
(2,368)
(277)
307,424
(3,130)
260,899
$
$
$
$
$
The amount of goodwill assigned to a discontinued operation is generally determined based on
the subject dealership’s discounted cash flows as it relates to the discounted cash flows of the reporting
unit.
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, other intangible assets included the value of franchise
agreements, non-compete agreements and customer lists. The value attributed to franchise agreements
has an indefinite useful life and non-compete agreements and customer lists are amortized on a straight-
line basis over the life of the agreements, typically 3 to 5 years.
F-16
The gross amount of other intangible assets and the related accumulated amortization for non-
compete agreements and customer lists were as follows (in thousands):
December 31,
Franchise value
Non-compete agreements and customer lists
Accumulated amortization
Net non-compete agreements and customer lists
Total other intangible assets, net
2006
68,936
247
(129)
118
69,054
$
$
2005
50,161
175
(89)
86
50,247
$
$
Amortization expense related to the non-compete agreements and customer lists is not material.
(6)
Trade Payables
Trade payables consisted of the following (in thousands):
December 31,
Trade payables
Lien payables
Manufacturer payables
Other
Total trade payables
2006
12,510
13,388
7,324
6,572
39,794
$
$
2005
10,450
10,832
4,744
4,891
30,917
$
$
Lien payables represent amounts owed to financial institutions for customer vehicle trade-ins.
(7)
Derivative Financial Instruments
We have entered into interest rate swaps to manage the variability of our interest rate exposure,
thus leveling a portion of our interest expense in a rising or falling rate environment. All of our interest rate
swaps were designated as cash flow hedging instruments at December 31, 2006, and we anticipate that
our interest rate swaps will continue to qualify for hedge accounting in the future. Accordingly, the changes
in fair value of the interest rate swaps below will be reflected as a component of other comprehensive
income in the equity section of our balance sheet in future periods. However, in the current period financial
statements, the changes in market value of the interest rate swaps were included in floorplan interest
expense as gains (losses) of $(1.9) million, $4.1 million and $3.7 million, respectively, in 2006, 2005 and
2004. Although in the current period the swaps did not qualify for hedge accounting, the derivatives did
serve to economically hedge interest costs.
On a quarterly basis, we will test the effectiveness of our hedges both retrospectively and
prospectively using regression analysis. Ineffectiveness equals the amount the change in fair market value
of the swap from designation to current period end outperforms the change in fair market value of the
hypothetical derivative from designation to current period end. The following information will be
documented on a quarterly basis: 1) whether or not it remains probable that we will continue to have debt
outstanding under the underlying debt agreement, or any replacement debt of at least the notional amount
of the swap; 2) the actual notional amount of the underlying debt; 3) the current variable rate index on the
underlying debt; 4) the current reset date on the underlying debt; and 5) the derivative counterparty credit
quality, which will include documentation of any degradation and its impact on derivative asset values. Any
ineffectiveness will be reflected in the floorplan interest expense in our statement of operations in the
period in which it occurs. There was no ineffectiveness as of December 31, 2006.
We have effectively changed the variable-rate cash flow exposure on a portion of our flooring
debt to fixed-rate cash flows by entering into receive-variable, pay-fixed interest rate swaps. Under the
interest rate swaps, we receive variable interest rate payments and make fixed interest rate payments,
thereby creating fixed rate flooring debt.
We do not enter into derivative instruments for any purpose other than to manage interest rate
exposure. That is, we do not engage in interest rate speculation using derivative instruments.
F-17
As of December 31, 2006, we have outstanding the following interest rate swaps with U.S. Bank
Dealer Commercial Services:
• effective January 26, 2003 – a five year, $25 million interest rate swap at a fixed rate of
3.265% per annum, variable rate adjusted on the 26th of each month;
• effective February 18, 2003 – a five year, $25 million interest rate swap at a fixed rate of
3.30% per annum, variable rate adjusted on the 1st and 16th of each month;
• effective November 18, 2003 – a five year, $25 million interest rate swap at a fixed rate of
3.65% per annum, variable rate adjusted on the 1st and 16th of each month;
• effective November 26, 2003 – a five year, $25 million interest rate swap at a fixed rate of
3.63% per annum, variable rate adjusted on the 26th of each month;
• effective March 9, 2004 – a five year, $25 million interest rate swap at a fixed rate of 3.25%
per annum, variable rate adjusted on the 1st and 16th of each month;
• effective March 18, 2004 – a five year, $25 million interest rate swap at a fixed rate of 3.10%
per annum, variable rate adjusted on the 1st and 16th of each month; and
• effective June 16, 2006 – a ten year, $25 million interest rate swap at a fixed rate of 5.587%
per annum, variable rate adjusted on the 1st and 16th of each month.
We earn interest on all of the interest rate swaps at the one-month LIBOR rate. The one-month
LIBOR rate at December 31, 2006 was 5.32% per annum.
The fair value of our interest rate swap agreements represents the estimated receipts or
payments that would be made to terminate the agreements. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the fair
values of all of our agreements totaled $3.4 million and $5.4 million, respectively, and were recorded as
components of other current and long-term assets and liabilities on our balance sheets. The periodic
changes in the fair values are recorded currently as a component of floorplan interest expense. The
difference between interest earned and the interest obligation results in a monthly settlement, which is
also recorded currently in the statement of operations as a component of floorplan interest expense.
(8)
Lines of Credit and Long-Term Debt
Lines of Credit
In August 2006, we entered into a new working capital, acquisition and used vehicle flooring
credit facility with U.S. Bank National Association, DaimlerChrysler Financial Services Americas LLC
(“DCFS”) and Toyota Motor Credit Corporation (“TMCC”), totaling up to $225 million, which expires
August 31, 2009. Loans are guaranteed by all of our subsidiaries and are secured by new vehicle
inventory, used vehicle and parts inventory, equipment other than fixtures, deposit accounts, accounts
receivable, investment property and other intangible personal property. Stock and other equity interests of
our subsidiary dealerships and certain other subsidiaries are excluded. The lenders’ security interest in
new vehicle inventory is subordinated to the interests of floorplan financing lenders, including DCFS and
TMCC. The agreement for this facility provides for events of default that include nonpayment, breach of
covenants, a change of control and certain cross-defaults with other indebtedness. In the event of a
default, the agreement provides that the lenders may declare the entire principal balance immediately
due, foreclose on collateral and increase the applicable interest rate to the revolving loan rate plus 3
percent, among other remedies.
The facility agreement includes financial and restrictive covenants typical of such agreements.
Financial covenants include requirements to maintain a minimum total net worth and imposes minimum
current ratio, fixed charge coverage ratio and cash flow leverage ratio requirements. The covenants
restrict us from incurring additional indebtedness, making investments, selling or acquiring assets and
granting security interests in our assets. At December 31, 2006, we were in compliance with all of the
financial and restrictive covenants.
In addition, cash dividends are limited to $15 million per fiscal year and repurchases by us of our
common stock are limited to $20 million per fiscal year.
Upon entering into this agreement, we terminated our previous $150 million working capital and
used vehicle flooring credit facility with DaimlerChrysler Services North America LLC and Toyota Motor
Credit Corporation and our $50 million revolving line of credit for leased vehicles and equipment
purchases with U.S. Bank N.A.
F-18
Ford Motor Credit, GMAC, Volkswagen Credit and BMW Financial Services NA, LLC have
agreed to floor all of our new vehicles for their respective brands with DCFS and TMCC serving as the
primary lenders for substantially all other brands. These new vehicle lines are secured by new vehicle
inventory of the relevant brands. Vehicles financed by lenders not directly associated with the
manufacturer are classified as floorplan notes payable: non-trade and are included as a financing activity
in our statements of cash flows. Vehicles financed by lenders directly associated with the manufacturer
are classified as floorplan notes payable and are included as an operating activity in our statements of
cash flows.
On November 30, 2006, GM completed the sale of a majority equity stake in GMAC to an
investment consortium. Although GMAC will continue to be the exclusive provider of GM financial
products and services and continues to have the relationships with GM, a majority equity stake in GMAC
has been sold to an independent third-party and GM has indicated in its public filings that it no longer
controls the GMAC entity. As a result, we will be treating new vehicles financed by GMAC after the
change in ownership control as floorplan notes payable: non-trade and related changes as a financing
activity in our statements of cash flows. Vehicles financed prior to this change in control will continue to
be classified as floorplan notes payable: trade, with related changes reflected as operating activities in
our statements of cash flows, since these GMAC vehicle financings occurred while GM retained control of
GMAC as its captive finance subsidiary.
Interest rates on all of the above facilities ranged from 6.47% to 7.50% at December 31, 2006.
Amounts outstanding on the lines at December 31, 2006, together with amounts remaining available
under such lines were as follows (in thousands):
New and program vehicle lines
Working capital, acquisition and used vehicle line
Outstanding at
December 31, 2006
$499,679
144,000
$643,679
Remaining Availability as
of December 31, 2006
$ (1)
80,089(2)
$80,089
(1) There are no formal limits on the new and program vehicle lines with certain lenders.
(2) Reduced by $911,000 for outstanding letters of credit.
Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes
We also have outstanding $85.0 million of 2.875% senior subordinated convertible notes due
2014. We will also pay contingent interest on the notes during any six-month interest period beginning
May 1, 2009, in which the trading price of the notes for a specified period of time equals or exceeds 120%
of the principal amount of the notes. The notes are convertible into shares of our Class A common stock
at a price of $37.69 per share upon the satisfaction of certain conditions and upon the occurrence of
certain events as follows:
•
•
•
if, prior to May 1, 2009, and during any calendar quarter, the closing sale price of our common
stock exceeds 120% of the conversion price for at least 20 trading days in the 30 consecutive
trading days ending on the last trading day of the preceding calendar quarter;
if, after May 1, 2009, the closing sale price of our common stock exceeds 120% of the
conversion price;
if, during the five business day period after any five consecutive trading day period in which the
trading price per $1,000 principal amount of notes for each day of such period was less than 98%
of the product of the closing sale price of our common stock and the number of shares issuable
upon conversion of $1,000 principal amount of the notes;
if the notes have been called for redemption; or
•
• upon certain specified corporate events.
A declaration and payment of a dividend in excess of $0.08 per share per quarter will result in an
adjustment in the conversion rate for the notes if such cumulative adjustment exceeds 1% of the current
conversion rate. We declared dividends of $0.14 per share for the quarters ended June 30, September 30
and December 31, 2006 and dividends of $0.12 per share for each of the four preceding quarters. As of
December 31, 2006, the affect of such dividends did not yet reach the 1% threshold amount and no
adjustment in the conversion rate was currently required. See also Note 20, Subsequent Event.
F-19
The notes are redeemable at our option beginning May 6, 2009 at the redemption price of 100%
of the principal amount plus any accrued interest. The holders of the notes can require us to repurchase
all or some of the notes on May 1, 2009 and upon certain events constituting a fundamental change or a
termination of trading. A fundamental change is any transaction or event in which all or substantially all of
our common stock is exchanged for, converted into, acquired for, or constitutes solely the right to receive,
consideration that is not all, or substantially all, common stock that is listed on, or immediately after the
transaction or event, will be listed on, a United States national securities exchange. A termination of
trading will have occurred if our common stock is not listed for trading on a national securities exchange
or the Nasdaq National Market.
Summary
Long-term debt consisted of the following (in thousands):
December 31,
Variable Rate Debt:
Equipment and leased vehicle line of credit, terminated August 2006
Working capital, acquisition and used vehicle floorplan line of credit, expiring August 31, 2009
Mortgages payable in monthly installments of $406, including interest between 7.1% and 9.4%,
2006
2005
$
- $
144,000
50,000
-
maturing through April 2024; secured by land and buildings
Notes payable in monthly installments of $26, including interest between 0.0% and 7.25%,
maturing at various dates through 2007; secured by vehicles leased to others
Notes payable related to acquisitions, with interest rate of 8.25%, maturing February 2008
Total Variable Rate Debt
Fixed Rate Debt:
2.875% senior subordinated convertible notes, due May 2014 with interest due semi-annually in
May and November of each year
Mortgages payable in monthly installments of $927, including interest between 4.0% and 8.2%,
maturing fully May 2022; secured by land and buildings
Notes payable related to acquisitions, with interest rates between 4.0% and 5.0%, maturing at
various dates through May 2018
Capital lease obligations, net of interest of $144, with monthly lease payments of $6
Total Fixed Rate Debt
Total Long-Term Debt
Less current maturities
42,437
44,090
3,540
20
189,997
2,704
179
96,973
85,000
85,000
126,146
113,702
7,213
584
218,943
408,940
(16,557)
392,383 $
1,235
509
200,446
297,419
(6,868)
290,551
$
The schedule of future principal payments on long-term debt as of December 31, 2006 was as
follows (in thousands):
Year Ending December 31,
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Thereafter
Total principal payments
$
$
16,557
38,727
167,836
9,974
22,860
152,986
408,940
(9)
Stockholders’ Equity
Class A and Class B Common Stock
The shares of Class A common stock are not convertible into any other series or class of our securities.
Each share of Class B common stock, however, is freely convertible into one share of Class A common
stock at the option of the holder of the Class B common stock. All shares of Class B common stock shall
automatically convert to shares of Class A common stock (on a share-for-share basis, subject to the
adjustments) on the earliest record date for an annual meeting of our stockholders on which the number
of shares of Class B common stock outstanding is less than 1% of the total number of shares of common
stock outstanding. Shares of Class B common stock may not be transferred to third parties, except for
transfers to certain family members and in other limited circumstances.
F-20
Holders of Class A common stock are entitled to one vote for each share held of record and
holders of Class B common stock are entitled to ten votes for each share held of record. The Class A
common stock and Class B common stock vote together as a single class on all matters submitted to a
vote of stockholders.
(10)
Cost of Sales
Cost of sales categorized by revenue category from continuing operations was as follows (in
thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
New vehicle sales
Used vehicle sales
Service, body and parts
Fleet and other
2006
1,700,481
753,256
176,920
3,760
2,634,417
$
$
2005
1,501,062 $
697,908
158,043
2,986
2,359,999 $
2004
1,378,188
635,031
143,905
6,461
2,163,585
$
$
(11)
Income Taxes
Income tax expense from continuing operations was as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
Current:
Federal
State
Deferred:
Federal
State
Total
2006
17,195
2,243
19,438
5,200
731
5,931
25,369
$
$
2005
25,683
3,672
29,355
5,514
741
6,255
35,610
2004
15,193
2,211
17,404
10,624
1,369
11,993
29,397
$
$
$
$
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, we had income taxes payable totaling $0.6 million and $1.1
million, respectively.
Individually significant components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities are presented below
(in thousands):
December 31,
Deferred tax assets:
Deferred revenue and cancellation reserves
Allowance and accruals
Total deferred tax assets
Deferred tax liabilities:
Inventories
Interest expense
Goodwill
Property and equipment, principally due to
differences in depreciation
Prepaids and property taxes
Total deferred tax liabilities
Total
2006
6,336
6,124
12,460
(4,553)
(2,961)
(35,140)
(17,550)
(1,191)
(61,395)
(48,935)
$
$
2005
5,366
5,031
10,397
(4,677)
(3,045)
(29,185)
(15,632)
(863)
(53,402)
(43,005)
$
$
In 2006, 2005 and 2004, income tax benefits attributable to employee stock option transactions of
$382,000, $584,000 and $415,000, respectively, were allocated to stockholders’ equity.
F-21
The reconciliation between amounts computed using the federal income tax rate of 35% and our
income tax expense from continuing operations for 2006, 2005 and 2004 is shown in the following
tabulation (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
Computed “expected” tax expense
State taxes, net of federal income tax benefit
Other
Income tax expense
2006
22,997
2,016
356
25,369
$
$
2005
32,054
2,951
605
35,610
$
$
2004
26,573
2,315
509
29,397
$
$
(12)
401(k) Profit Sharing Plan
We have a defined contribution 401(k) plan and trust covering substantially all full-time
employees. The annual contribution to the plan is at the discretion of our Board of Directors. Contributions
of $1.2 million, $1.8 million and $1.3 million were recognized for the years ended December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004, respectively. Employees may contribute to the plan as they meet certain eligibility
requirements.
(13)
Stock Incentive Plans
2003 Stock Incentive Plan
Our 2003 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2003 Plan”) allows for the granting of up to a total of 2.2
million nonqualified stock options and shares of restricted stock to our officers, key employees and
consultants. We also have options outstanding and exercisable pursuant to their original terms pursuant
to prior plans. Options canceled under prior plans do not return to the pool of options to be granted again
in the future. All of our option plans are administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board and
permit accelerated vesting of outstanding options upon the occurrence of certain changes in control.
Options become exercisable over a period of up to five years from the date of grant with expiration dates
up to ten years from the date of grant and at exercise prices as determined by the Board. Beginning in
2004, the expiration date of options granted was reduced to six years. At December 31, 2006, 2,420,147
shares of Class A common stock were reserved for issuance under the plans, of which 1,191,990 were
available for future grant.
Activity under the above plan was as follows:
Balances, December 31, 2005
Granted
Forfeited
Expired
Exercised
Balances, December 31, 2006
Balances, December 31, 2005
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Balances, December 31, 2006
Shares Subject
to Options
1,227,684
112,000
(40,604)
-
(70,923)
1,228,157
Non-Vested
Stock
49,767
73,328
(4,400)
(15,492)
103,203
Weighted Average
Exercise Price
$19.06
31.67
25.53
-
15.01
20.23
Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair Value
$27.58
31.73
32.22
29.72
30.01
F-22
Certain information regarding options outstanding as of December 31, 2006 was as follows:
Number
Weighted average per share
exercise price
Aggregate intrinsic value
Weighted average remaining
contractual term
Options
Outstanding
1,228,157
$20.23
$11.1 million
4.1 years
Options
Exercisable
630,586
$15.14
$8.7 million
3.9 years
As of December 31, 2006, unrecognized stock-based compensation related to outstanding, but
unvested stock option and stock awards was $4.7 million, which will be recognized over the weighted
average remaining vesting period of 2.4 years.
1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan
In 1998, the Board of Directors and the stockholders approved the implementation of an
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “Purchase Plan”), and, as amended in May 2006, have reserved a
total of 2.45 million shares of Class A common stock for issuance thereunder. The Purchase Plan expires
December 31, 2012. The Purchase Plan is intended to qualify as an “Employee Stock Purchase Plan”
under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and is administered by the
Compensation Committee of the Board. Eligible employees are entitled to defer up to 10% of their base
pay for the purchase of stock up to $25,000 of fair market value of our Class A common stock annually.
Prior to April 1, 2005, the purchase price for shares purchased under the Purchase Plan was 85% of the
lesser of the fair market value at the beginning or end of the purchase period. Beginning April 1, 2005, the
purchase price is equal to 85% of the fair market value at the end of the purchase period. During 2006, a
total of 227,860 shares were purchased under the Purchase Plan at a weighted average price of $25.37
per share, which represented a weighted average discount from the fair market value of $4.46 per share.
As of December 31, 2006, 756,600 shares remained available for purchase under the Purchase Plan.
Stock-Based Compensation
We estimate the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes valuation model. This
valuation model takes into account the exercise price of the award, as well as a variety of significant
assumptions. We believe that the valuation technique and the approach utilized to develop the underlying
assumptions are appropriate in calculating the fair values of our stock options. Estimates of fair value are
not intended to predict actual future events or the value ultimately realized by persons who receive equity
awards.
Beginning April 1, 2005, compensation expense related to our Purchase Plan is calculated based
on the 15% discount from the per share market price on the date of grant. Prior to April 1, 2005, it was
calculated using the Black-Scholes valuation model. Compensation expense related to non-vested stock
is based on the intrinsic value on the date of grant as if the stock is vested. Compensation expense
related to stock options is valued using the Black-Scholes valuation model with following assumptions:
Year Ended December 31,
Employee Stock Purchase Plan(1)
Risk-free interest rates
Dividend yield
Expected lives
Volatility
Discount for post vesting restrictions
Option Plans
Risk-free interest rates(2)
Dividend yield(3)
Expected term(4)
Volatility(5)
Discount for post vesting restrictions
2006
2005
2004
-
-
-
-
-
2.32%
1.23%
3 months
28.18%
0.0%
0.93% - 1.71%
0.99% - 1.45%
3 months
28.11% - 47.31%
0.0%
4.77%
1.51%
4.7 – 5.3 years
35.31%
0.0%
3.58% - 3.71%
1.16% - 1.20%
5.4 years
41.92% - 42.04%
0.0%
2.80%
1.04%
5.4 years
43.32%
0.0%
(1) There are no values for the employee stock purchase plan for 2006 since there is no longer a look-back period and the related
compensation cost is equal to the intrinsic value of the 15% discount on the day of purchase.
(2) The risk-free interest rate for each grant is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for a period
equal to the expected term of the stock option.
F-23
(3) The dividend yield is calculated as a ratio of annualized expected dividend per share to the market value of our common stock
on the date of grant.
(4) The expected term is calculated based on the observed and expected time to post-vesting exercise behavior of separate
identifiable employee groups.
(5) The expected volatility is estimated based on a weighted average of historical volatility of our common stock.
We amortize stock-based compensation on a straight-line basis over the vesting period of the
individual award with estimated forfeitures considered. Shares to be issued upon the exercise of stock
options will come from newly issued shares.
Certain information regarding our stock-based compensation was as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
Weighted average grant-date per share fair
2006
2005
2004
value of share options granted
$
10.93
$
10.69
$
Per share intrinsic value of non-vested
stock granted
Weighted average per share discount for
compensation expense recognized under
the Purchase Plan
Total
intrinsic value of share options
31.73
27.54
4.37
4.69
11.52
23.81
5.13
exercised
1.1 million
2.6 million
3.0 million
Fair value of non-vested shares that vested
during the period
Stock-based compensation recognized in
results of operations (all as a component
of selling, general and administrative
expense)
Tax benefit recognized in statement of
operations
Cash received from options exercised and
shares purchased under all share-based
arrangements
Tax deduction realized related to stock
options exercised
142,000
86,000
76,000
3.5 million
490,000
714,000
187,000
240,000
93,000
6.8 million
8.0 million
7.1 million
424,000
707,000
450,000
Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, excess tax benefits realized upon the exercise of stock
options were classified as an operating activity in our statements of cash flows. SFAS No. 123R requires
that these excess tax benefits be reclassified in the statements of cash flows as a cash flow from
financing activities. For 2006, the amount of excess tax benefits that were shown as a financing activity
in our statements of cash flows was $369,000.
The following reconciles what certain operating results would have been without the effects of
applying SFAS No. 123R in 2006 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Income from continuing operations before income taxes
Net income
Cash flow from operating activities
Cash flow from financing activities
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
$
$
As Reported
65,706
37,304
37,939
114,872
1.91
1.77
Pro Forma
without effects of
applying SFAS
No. 123R
68,716
39,820
38,308
114,503
2.04
1.89
F-24
(14)
Dividend Payments
For the period January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2006, we declared and paid dividends as
follows:
Quarter related to:
2003
Fourth quarter
2004
First quarter
Second quarter
Third quarter
Fourth quarter
2005
First quarter
Second quarter
Third quarter
Fourth quarter
2006
First quarter
Second quarter
Third quarter
Dividend
amount per
share
Total
amount of
dividend (in
thousands)
$0.07
$1,304
0.07
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.08
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.12
0.14
0.14
1,312
1,506
1,512
1,528
1,536
2,312
2,322
2,338
2,354
2,754
2,738
See also Note 20 for information regarding the declaration and payment of a dividend related to
the fourth quarter of 2006.
(15)
Commitments and Contingencies
Leases
The minimum lease payments under our operating leases after December 31, 2006 were as
follows (in thousands):
Year Ending December 31,
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
Thereafter
Total minimum lease payments
Less: sublease rentals
$
23,911
22,722
18,693
15,742
12,814
90,738
184,620
(2,238)
$ 182,382
Rental expense, net of rent income, for all operating leases was $20.0 million, $17.9 million and
$18.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. These amounts are
included as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses in our statements of operations.
Primarily in connection with dispositions of dealerships, we occasionally assign or sublet our
interests in any real property leases associated with such dealerships to the purchaser. We often retain
responsibility for the performance of certain obligations under such leases to the extent that the assignee
or sublessee does not perform, whether such performance is required prior to or following the assignment
of subletting of the lease. Additionally, we generally remain subject to the terms of any guarantees made
by us in connection with such leases. However, we generally have indemnification rights against the
assignee or sublessee in the event of non-performance, as well as certain other defenses. We may also
be called upon to perform other obligations under these leases, such as environmental remediation of the
premises or repairs upon termination of the lease. Although we currently have no reason to believe that
we will be called upon to perform any such services, there can be no assurance that any future
performance required by us under these leases will not have a material adverse effect on our financial
F-25
condition or results of operations. Lease rental payments under assigned or sublet leases for their
remaining terms totaled approximately $4.0 million at December 31, 2006.
Capital Commitments
We had capital commitments of $62.7 million at December 31, 2006 for the construction of nine
new facilities and additions to two existing facilities. Of the new facilities, five are replacing existing
facilities. We have already incurred $6.1 million for these projects and anticipate incurring an additional
$45.0 million in 2007 and $17.7 million in 2008.
We also had capital commitments of $1.6 million for the acquisition and development of hardware
and software for several information technology initiatives. We anticipate incurring these amounts during
2007.
In addition to the above, we have approximately $112.3 million in planned capital expenditures
under consideration for various new facilities and remodeling projects. These projects are still in the
planning stage or are awaiting approvals from governmental agencies or manufacturers.
Charge-Backs for Various Contracts
We have recorded a reserve for our estimated contractual obligations related to potential charge-
backs for vehicle service contracts, lifetime oil change contracts and other various insurance contracts
that are terminated early by the customer. At December 31, 2006, this reserve totaled $14.5 million.
Based on past experience, we estimate that the $14.5 million will be paid out as follows: $8.8 million in
2007; $3.8 million in 2008; $1.4 million in 2009; $0.4 million in 2010; and $0.1 million thereafter.
Regulatory Compliance
We are subject to numerous state and federal regulations common in the automotive sector that
cover retail transactions with customers and employment and trade practices. We do not anticipate that
compliance with these regulations will have an adverse effect on our business, consolidated results of
operations, financial condition or cash flows, although such outcome is possible given the nature of our
operations and the legal and regulatory environment affecting our business.
Litigation
We are party to numerous legal proceedings arising in the normal course of our business. While
we cannot predict with certainty the outcomes of these matters, we do not anticipate that the resolution of
these proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial
condition, or cash flows.
On November 25, 2003, Aimee Phillips filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of
Oregon (Case No. 03-3109-HO) against Lithia Motors, Inc. and two of its wholly-owned subsidiaries
alleging violations of state and federal RICO laws, the Oregon Unfair Trade Practices Act (“UTPA”) and
common law fraud. Ms. Phillips seeks damages, attorney’s fees and injunctive relief. Ms. Phillips’
complaint stems from her purchase of a Toyota Tacoma pick-up truck on July 6, 2002. On May 14, 2004,
we filed an answer to Ms. Phillips’ Complaint. This case was consolidated with the Allen case described
below and has a similar current procedural status.
On April 28, 2004, Robert Allen and 29 other plaintiffs (“Allen Plaintiffs”) filed a lawsuit in the U.S.
District Court for the District of Oregon (Case No. 04-3032-HO) against Lithia Motors, Inc. and three of its
wholly-owned subsidiaries alleging violations of state and federal RICO laws, the Oregon UTPA and
common law fraud. The Allen Plaintiffs seek damages, attorney’s fees and injunctive relief. The Allen
Plaintiffs’ Complaint stems from vehicle purchases made at Lithia dealerships between July 2000 and
April 2001. On August 27, 2004, we filed a Motion to Dismiss the Complaint. On May 26, 2005, the Court
entered an Order granting Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss plaintiffs’ state and federal RICO claims with
prejudice. The Court declined to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiffs’ UTPA and fraud
claims. Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Reconsider the dismissal Order. On August 23, 2005, the Court
granted Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration and permitted the filing of a Second Amended Complaint
(“SAC”). On September 21, 2005, the Allen Plaintiffs, along with Ms. Phillips, filed the SAC. In this
complaint, the Allen plaintiffs seek actual damages that total less than $500,000, trebled, approximately
$3.0 million in mental distress claims, trebled, punitive damages of $15.0 million, attorney’s fees and
F-26
injunctive relief. The SAC added as defendants certain officers and employees of Lithia. In addition, the
SAC added a claim for relief based on the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”). On November 14, 2005 we filed
a second Motion to Dismiss the Complaint and a Motion to Compel Arbitration. On April 27, 2006, the
court granted our motion to dismiss a number of the claims but permitted others to proceed. In particular,
all TILA claims were dismissed, some of the RICO claims have been eliminated and any claims for non-
economic damages for the alleged fraud have been dismissed. We believe the actions of the court have
significantly narrowed the claims and potential damages sought by the plaintiffs. Lithia’s motion to
Compel Arbitration on Plaintiffs’ remaining claims is still pending.
On September 23, 2005, Maria Anabel Aripe and 19 other plaintiffs (“Aripe Plaintiffs”) filed a
lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon (Case No. 05-3083-HO) against Lithia Motors,
Inc., 12 of its wholly-owned subsidiaries and certain officers and employees of Lithia, alleging violations of
state and federal RICO laws, the Oregon UTPA, common law fraud and TILA. The Aripe Plaintiffs seek
actual damages of less than $600,000, trebled, approximately $3.7 million in mental distress claims,
trebled, punitive damages of $12.6 million, attorney’s fees and injunctive relief. The Aripe Plaintiffs’
Complaint stems from vehicle purchases made at Lithia dealerships between May 2001 and August 2005
and is substantially similar to the allegations made in the Allen case. We expect certain of the rulings in
the Allen case to apply equally to this case and proceedings in this matter are awaiting rulings in the
Allen case. Once resolved, we further expect to file motions directed at all claims.
On May 30, 2006 four of our wholly owned subsidiaries located in Alaska were served with a
lawsuit alleging that the dealerships failed to comply with Alaska law relating to various disclosures
required to be made during the sale of a used vehicle. The complaint was filed by Jackie Lee Neese et al
v. Lithia Chrysler Jeep of Anchorage, Inc. et al in the Superior Court for the State of Alaska at Anchorage,
case number 3AN-06-04815CI. The complainants seek to represent other similarly situated customers.
The court has not certified the suit as a class action.
We intend to vigorously defend all matters and management believes that the likelihood of a
judgment for the amount of damages sought in any of the cases is remote.
(16) Related Party Transactions
Mark DeBoer Construction
During 2005 and 2004, we paid Mark DeBoer Construction, Inc. $0.8 million, and $1.6 million,
respectively, for remodeling certain of our facilities. Mark DeBoer is the son of Sidney B. DeBoer, our
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. These amounts included $162,000 and $0.7 million, respectively,
paid for subcontractors and materials, $102,000 and $42,000, respectively for permits, licenses, travel
and various miscellaneous fees, and $0.5 million and $0.9 million, respectively, for contractor fees. We
believe the amounts paid were fair in comparison with fees negotiated with independent third parties and
all significant transactions were reviewed and approved by our independent audit committee.
Commencing January 1, 2006, Mark DeBoer became a full-time employee of Lithia with the title of Vice
President Real Estate.
F-27
(17)
Acquisitions
The following acquisitions were made in 2006:
•
In April 2006, we acquired the Fresno Dodge store in Fresno, California. The store has
anticipated annualized revenues of $50 million. The store was renamed Lithia Dodge of
Fresno.
In May 2006, we acquired the Latham Motors store in Twin Falls, Idaho. The store has
anticipated annualized revenues of $25 million. The store was renamed Lithia Chrysler Jeep
Dodge of Twin Falls.
In June 2006, we acquired the TradeMark Chrysler Jeep Dodge store in Bryan – College
Station, Texas. The store has anticipated annualized revenues of $60 million. The store was
renamed Lithia Chrysler Jeep Dodge of Bryan College Station.
In June 2006, we acquired the Eversole Motors store in La Crosse, Wisconsin. The store has
anticipated annualized revenues of $25 million. The store was renamed Lithia Chrysler Jeep
Dodge of La Crosse.
In August 2006, we acquired the Ukiah Dodge Chrysler Jeep store in Ukiah, California. The
store has anticipated annualized revenues of $10 million. The store was renamed Lithia
Chrysler Jeep Dodge of Ukiah.
In October 2006, we acquired the Hansen Motors Group in Grand Forks, North Dakota. The
stores had annualized combined revenues of approximately $85 million.
In October 2006, we acquired the My BMW and My Porsche stores in Seaside, California.
The stores had annualized combined revenues of approximately $70 million. The stores were
renamed BMW of Monterey and Porsche of Monterey.
In October 2006, we acquired the Midwest Automotive stores in Des Moines, Iowa. The
stores had annualized combined revenues of approximately $65 million. The stores were
renamed BMW of Des Moines and Mercedes-Benz of Des Moines.
In December 2006, we acquired the Allen Motor company stores in Cedar Rapids, Iowa. The
stores had annualized combined revenues of approximately $80 million. The stores were
renamed Buick GMC Cadillac of North Cedar Rapids, Saturn of Cedar Rapids and Kia of
Cedar Rapids.
The following acquisitions were made in 2005:
•
In January 2005, we acquired a Chrysler and Jeep franchise in Concord, California. The
franchises were added to our Dodge store in that market. The store is now named Lithia
Chrysler Jeep Dodge of Concord.
In January 2005, we acquired a Chrysler franchise in Eugene, Oregon. The franchise was
added to our Dodge store in that market. The stores name is now Lithia Chrysler Dodge of
Eugene.
In February 2005, we acquired a Chrysler, Jeep, Dodge, Dodge Truck store in Omaha,
Nebraska. The store has anticipated annualized revenues of $110 million. The store was
renamed Lithia Chrysler Jeep Dodge of Omaha.
In April 2005, we acquired a Chrysler, Dodge, Dodge Truck store in Eureka, California. The
store has anticipated annualized revenues of $28 million. The store was renamed Lithia
Chrysler Dodge of Eureka.
In May 2005, we acquired a Chrysler, Jeep, Dodge, Dodge Truck store in Butte, Montana.
The store has anticipated annualized revenues of $26 million. The store was renamed Lithia
Chrysler Dodge Jeep of Butte.
In August 2005, we acquired a Chrysler, Dodge, Dodge Truck store in Wenatchee,
Washington. The store had annualized revenues of approximately $8 million. The store was
renamed Lithia Chrysler Dodge of Wenatchee.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
F-28
•
•
•
In October 2005, we acquired a Honda store and Chrysler and Jeep franchises that were
added to our existing Dodge store in Midland, Texas. The combined stores and franchises
have anticipated annualized revenues of $24 million. The Honda store was renamed Honda
of Midland.
In November 2005, we acquired a Toyota and a Honda store in Abilene, Texas. The stores
have anticipated annualized revenues of $60 million. The stores were renamed Lithia Toyota
of Abilene and Honda of Abilene.
In December 2005, we acquired a Dodge store in Corpus Christi, Texas. The store has
anticipated annualized revenues of $60 million. The store was renamed Lithia Dodge of
Corpus Christi.
The above acquisitions were all accounted for under the purchase method of accounting.
Unaudited pro forma results of operations assuming all of the above acquisitions occurred as of January
1, 2005 were as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts).
Year Ended December 31,
Total revenues
Net income
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
$
$
2006
3,408,302
35,650
1.83
1.70
2005
3,409,179
57,418
2.99
2.72
There are no future contingent payouts related to any of the 2005 or 2006 acquisitions and no
portion of the purchase price was paid with our equity securities. During 2006, we acquired the 13 stores
discussed above for $105.5 million, which included $47.2 million of goodwill and $20.1 million of other
intangible assets. During 2005, we acquired the eight stores discussed above for $51.7 million, which
included $21.9 million of goodwill and $8.4 million of other intangible assets.
Within one year from the purchase date of each store, we may update the value allocated to its
purchased assets and the resulting goodwill balances as a result of information received regarding the
valuation of such assets that was not available at the time of purchase. At December 31, 2006, there
were 13 store acquisitions within the one year allocation window. All of the goodwill from the above
acquisitions is expected to be deductible for tax purposes.”
(18)
Discontinued Operations
We continually monitor the performance of each of our dealerships and make determinations to
sell based primarily on return on capital criteria. When a dealership meets the criteria of “held for sale,”
as defined in SFAS No. 144, the results of operations are reclassified into discontinued operations. All
dealerships included in discontinued operations have been, or will be, eliminated from our on-going
operations upon completion of the sale. We anticipate the completion of the sale for each dealership to
occur within 12 months from the date of determination.
During 2006, we disposed of two of our dealerships that were held for sale at December 31, 2005
and classified two additional dealerships as discontinued operations, which were held for sale at
December 31, 2006. During 2005, we sold a building we had held for sale at December 31, 2004, sold
one dealership and classified two additional dealerships as discontinued operations, which were held for
sale at December 31, 2005. During 2004, we disposed of the franchises included with a dealership we
had held for sale at December 31, 2003.
Certain financial information related to discontinued operations was as follows (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31,
Revenue
Pre-tax loss
Gain (loss) on disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax
Amount of goodwill and other intangible assets disposed of
$
2006
60,044
(4,991)
(554)
3,552
$
$
2005
129,602
(3,894)
16
4,406
2004
181,484
(1,442)
186
1,900
The pre-tax loss in 2006 included legal settlements related to dealerships in California that were
sold in prior years.
F-29
Interest expense is allocated to stores classified as discontinued operations for actual flooring
interest expense directly related to the new vehicles in the store. Interest expense related to our used
vehicle line of credit is allocated based on total used vehicle inventory of the store, and interest expense
related to our equipment line of credit is allocated based on the amount of fixed assets.
Assets held for sale included the following (in thousands):
December 31,
Inventories
Property, plant and equipment
Goodwill and other intangible assets
2006
11,594
2,949
942
15,485
$
$
2005
22,703
817
3,891
27,411
$
$
Liabilities held for sale included the following (in thousands):
December 31,
Floorplan notes payable
Real estate debt
2006
9,605
2,005
11,610
$
$
2005
22,388
-
22,388
$
$
(19)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
SFAS No. 159
In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 159,
“The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities,” which permits entities to choose to
measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of
the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. We are currently
analyzing the effects of adopting SFAS No. 159.
SFAS No. 157
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” which
establishes a single authoritative definition of fair value, sets out a framework for measuring fair value and
requires additional disclosures about fair-value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. While we are still analyzing the effects of applying SFAS No. 157, we
believe that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will not have a material effect on our financial position or
results of operations.
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108
In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin
(“SAB”) No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in
Current Year Financial Statements,” which addresses how the effects of prior-year uncorrected
misstatements should be considered when quantifying misstatements
financial
statements. SAB No. 108 requires companies to quantify misstatements using both the balance sheet
and income statement approaches and to evaluate whether either approach results in quantifying an error
that is material in light of relevant quantitative and qualitative factors. SAB No. 108 is effective for annual
financial statements covering the first fiscal year ending after November 15, 2006. We adopted SAB No.
108 in the fourth quarter of 2006. The adoption of SAB No. 108 did not have a material effect on our
financial position or results of operations.
in current-year
FASB Staff Position No. AUG AIR-1
In September 2006, the FASB issued Staff Position No. AUG AIR-1, “Accounting for Planned
Major Maintenance Activities,” which prohibits accruing for the future cost of periodic major overhauls and
planned maintenance of plant and equipment in annual and interim periods. This Staff Position is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and must be retrospectively applied. We do not
accrue for such costs in annual or interim periods and, accordingly, the adoption of this Staff Position will
not have any effect on our financial position or results of operations.
F-30
FASB Interpretation No. 48
In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes,” which is an interpretation of SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Interpretation No. 48
applies to all tax positions accounted for under SFAS No. 109. The interpretation applies to situations
where the uncertainty is to the timing of the deduction, the amount of the deduction, or the validity of the
deduction. Interpretation No. 48 is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning after
December 15, 2006 (January 1, 2007 for calendar-year companies). At adoption, companies must adjust
their financial statements to reflect only those tax positions that are more-likely-than-not to be sustained
as of the adoption date. Positions that meet this criterion should be measured using the largest benefit
that is more than 50 percent likely to be realized. The necessary adjustment should be recorded directly
to the beginning balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption and reported as a change in
accounting principle. Retrospective application is prohibited. The expected adjustment to retained
earnings upon adoption of Interpretation No. 48 is approximately $706,000; however, it is expected to
have no effect on results of operations or cash flow.
EITF Issue No. 06-3
Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue 06-3, “How Taxes Collected from Customers and
Remitted to Governmental Authorities Should Be Presented in the Income Statement (That Is, Gross
versus Net Presentation),” requires us to disclose our accounting policy for any tax assessed by a
governmental authority that is directly imposed on a revenue-producing transaction (i.e., sales, use, value
added) on a gross (included in revenues and costs) or net (excluded from revenues) basis. EITF Issue
06-3 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2006, with earlier application permitted. We
account for such taxes on a net basis.
(20)
Subsequent Events
Dividend
In January 2007, our Board of Directors approved a dividend on our Class A and Class B
common stock of $0.14 per share for the fourth quarter of 2006. The dividend, which totaled
approximately $2.7 million, was paid on January 30, 2007 to shareholders of record on January 16, 2007.
Acquisition
In February 2007, we acquired Jordan Motors, Inc. with dealerships in Ames, Johnston and Des
Moines, Iowa. The stores had annualized combined revenues of approximately $100 million. The stores
were renamed Honda of Ames, Lithia Nissan of Ames, Acura of Johnston, Lithia Infiniti of Des Moines,
Lithia Volkswagen of Des Moines and Audi Des Moines.
Change in Subordinate Note Conversion Rate
A declaration and payment of a dividend in excess of $0.08 per share per quarter will result in an
adjustment in the conversion rate for the notes if such cumulative adjustment exceeds 1% of the current
conversion rate. Effective January 17, 2007, we exceeded the 1% threshold required for a change in the
conversion rate. With this change, the conversion rate per $1,000 of notes increased to 26.8556 from
26.5331.
F-31
(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
(THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK)
CORPORATE INFORMATION
Annual Meeting
The Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held at 4:00 P.M., Thursday, May 10,
Ashland Springs Hotel, 212 East Main Street, Ashland, Oregon 97520. Notice of the meeting and
proxy statement materials are being sent to all shareholders. The Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, includes all information as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, except exhibits.
Shareholder Communications
The Company welcomes your comments about its operations or any aspect of its business. Please
contact our Investor Relations Group at 1-541-776-6591.
Description of Business:
Automobile sales and service
Corporate Headquarters:
360 East Jackson Street, Medford, Oregon 97501
Trading Information
(As of March 6, 2007):
(NYSE - LAD)
19,618,032 shares issued and outstanding
Class A
Class B
15,855,801
3,762,231
Auditors:
KPMG LLP, Portland, Oregon
Legal Counsel:
Foster Pepper LLP, Portland, Oregon
Transfer Agent:
Executive Officers:
Computershare Trust Company
350 Indian St., Suite 800
Golden, Colorado 80401
Sidney B. DeBoer, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
M.L. Dick Heimann, Vice-Chairman
Bryan DeBoer, President and Chief Operating Officer
R. Bradford Gray, Executive Vice President
Don Jones, Jr., Senior Vice President, Retail Operations
Jeffrey B. DeBoer, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
Lithia Board of Directors:
Sidney B. DeBoer
M.L. Dick Heimann
Thomas R. Becker
William J. Young
Gerald F. Taylor
Maryann Keller
M
M
P
P
3
3
1
1
:
:
2
2
3
3
:
:
2
2
1
1
7
7
0
0
/
/
1
1
2
2
/
/
3
3
s
s
p
p
e
e
.
.
p
p
r
r
u
u
p
p
_
_
7
7
t
t
r
r
p
p
R
R
n
n
A
A
_
_
7
7
0
0
5
5
1
1
3
3
0
0
_
_
8
8
0
0
1
1
_
_
p
p
a
a
M
M
C
M
Y
M
C
Y
M
Y
C
Y
M
C
K