LXP Industrial Trust Annual Report 2018

← All annual reports

FY2018 Annual Report · LXP Industrial Trust

Loading PDF…

T
S
U
R
T

Y
T
L
A
E
R

N
O
T
G
N
X
E
L

Lexington Realty Trust

One Penn Plaza, Suite 4015

New York, NY 10119

www.lxp.com

T
S
U
R
T

Y
T
L
A
E
R

N
O
T
G
N
X
E
L

2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T

COMPANY OVERVIEW

CORPORATE INFORMATION

Since 1973, Lexington Realty Trust (NYSE: LXP) and its predecessors have been
market leaders in the financing, development, and ownership of single-tenant
commercial real estate across the United States. Our investment strategy is focused
on owning well-located industrial assets net-leased to corporate tenants.

EDWARDSVILLE, ILLINOIS | INDUSTRIAL

Non-Executive Trustees

E. Robert Roskind 4
Non-Executive Chairman

Richard S. Frary 1,2,4,5,6
Founding Partner
Tallwood Associates, Inc.

Executive Officers

T. Wilson Eglin4
Chief Executive Officer
President
Trustee

Joseph S. Bonventre
Executive Vice President
General Counsel
Secretary

Lawrence L. Gray1,2,4,6
Chief Executive Officer
GrayCo, Inc.

Jamie Handwerker1,3,6
Partner
KSH Capital

Beth Boulerice
Chief Financial Officer
Executive Vice President
Treasurer

Patrick Carroll
Chief Risk Officer
Executive Vice President

Claire A. Koeneman2,3,6
Partner
Bully Pulpit Interactive

Howard S. Roth1,3,6
Principal
HSR Advisors

James Dudley
Executive Vice President

Lara Johnson
Executive Vice President

Brendan Mullinix
Executive Vice President

Corporate Headquarters

Investor Relations

Transfer Agent and Registrar

One Penn Plaza, Suite 4015
New York, NY 10119
Tel: (212) 692-7200

Regional Office

12400 Coit Road, Suite 970
Dallas, TX 75251
Tel : (214) 210-3770

Web Site

www.lxp.com

Information contained on our web
site or the web site of any other
person is not incorporated by refer-
ence into this annual report or any
of our filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.

10-K Certification and Filing

We filed the certifications required
by Section 302 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002 as exhibits to
our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31,
2018, which are included herein. In
addition, in 2018, we sub mitted an
unqualified certification required by
section 303A.12(a) of the Listed
Company Manual of the New York
Stock Exchange.

Lexington Realty Trust
One Penn Plaza, Suite 4015
New York, NY 10119-4015
Attn: Investor Relations
Telephone: (212) 692-7200
E-mail: ir@lxp.com or
hgentry@lxp.com

Annual Meeting

Our Annual Meeting of
Shareholders is scheduled for
Tuesday, May 21, 2019 at 10:00 a.m.,
Eastern Time, at the offices of
Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park
Avenue, New York, NY 10166.

Forward-Looking Statements

Reference is made to “Risk
Factors” in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2018, which is
included herein, for discussion
of certain factors that might
cause actual results to differ
materially from those set forth in
any forward-looking statements
included herein.

NYSE Symbols

LXP (Common)
LXPPRC (Preferred)

Computershare
PO Box 50500
Louisville, KY 40233
Tel: (800) 850-3948 (toll-free)
(201) 680-6578 (outside of U.S.)
www-us.computershare.com/
investor

Overnight correspondence:
Computershare
462 South 4th Street, Suite 1600
Louisville, KY 40202

Direct Share Purchase Plan

Information regarding our Direct
Share Purchase Plan, including
the dividend rein vest ment com-
ponent, may be obtained from
our transfer agent and registrar,
Computershare. Answers to many
of your shareholder questions and
requests for forms are available by
visiting www-us.computershare.
com/investor.

Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm

Deloitte & Touche LLP, U.S.
New York, NY

1 Audit Committee Member

2 Compensation Committee Member

3 Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Member
4 Executive Committee Member
5 Lead Trustee
6 Independent Trustee

HEADERLXP 2018 ANNUAL REPORTDEAR FELLOW SHAREHOLDERS

We were honored to celebrate our 25th anniversary as a public com-
pany in October 2018, marking a memorable milestone for Lexington
Realty Trust. Our experiences over the last 25 years in the property
and capital markets are the basis for our evolution and refined business
strategy. We have initiated a number of changes in recent years to sim-
plify and focus our operations, and 2018 proved to be a pivotal year.
Execution was strong as we continued to transition the company to a
single-tenant, net-lease industrial REIT.

Our focused execution in 2018 closely reflected our goals set forth at
the end of 2017. We acquired high-quality industrial assets, sold of-
fice and other non-core positions, upgraded the quality of our port-
folio holdings, proactively managed lease expirations, and improved
our balance sheet metrics. Additionally, we repurchased shares
throughout the year to take advantage of the disconnect between our
share price and net asset value, which we believe was a compelling
value proposition and an optimal use of our capital. Our sustained
efforts continue to position the company for consistent and attrac-
tive earnings and net asset value growth over the long-term. Most
notable 2018 highlights include:

n Compelling Growth Opportunities – Acquired $316 million

of industrial real estate

n Robust Repositioning Efforts – Disposed of $1.1 billion

of office and other non-core assets

n Enhanced Portfolio Composition – Increased industrial
exposure to 71% and reduced office exposure to 27%1

n Proactive Asset Management – Leased 1.9 million square feet

n Advantageous Share Repurchase Program – Repurchased
5.9 million common shares at an average price of $8.05 per
common share

n Strong and Flexible Balance Sheet – Attained historically low

leverage of 4.7x net debt to EBITDA

1 Based on gross book value of real estate assets as of 12/31/2018; excludes held for sale assets.

NOTABLE 2018
HIGHLIGHTS

$316M
Acquired

$1.1B
Sold

71%
Industrial Exposure1

1.9M SF
Leased

5.9M
Shares Repurchased

4.7x
Net Debt to EBITA

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
8

0
2

P
X
L

HEADER

COMPELLING GROWTH OPPORTUNITIES

INDUSTRIAL
PROPERTY TYPE
DISTRIBUTION1

14%

13%

64%

n Warehouse/Distribution
n Manufacturing
n Cold Storage/Freezer
n Light Manufacturing

1 As a % of GAAP rent, excluding termina-
tion income, for consolidated industrial
properties owned as of 12/31/2018.
2 Based on gross book value of real estate
assets as of 12/31/2018; excludes held for
sale assets.

3 Based on a square footage and GAAP and

cash revenue basis.

Our business plan is designed to focus on single-tenant industrial
assets, and at year-end 2018, more than 71% of our total portfolio was
invested in industrial properties.2 We have been successful in refining
our portfolio by concentrating on owning high-quality warehouse/
distribution assets in both primary and secondary markets. Among
the most active investors in the market over the last three years, we
have added 17 million square feet of industrial product to the portfo-
lio, substantially all of which has been warehouse/distribution facili-
ties. Additionally, roughly 50% of our current industrial portfolio is
located within the top 25 U.S. industrial markets.3

As a well-capitalized, long-term real estate investor in a sector with
compelling fundamentals, our appetite remains strong for high-
quality, single-tenant industrial real estate. We are pleased with our
2018 acquisition activity of $316 million of industrial facilities,
and we continue to find attractive prospects in the marketplace.
Our emphasis is on acquiring general purpose warehouse/distribu-
tion properties within industrial submarkets supported by favor-
able trends in demand, e-commerce, population, and job growth.
We also intend to remain active in the development of industrial
build-to-suit projects as the demand by single tenants for industrial
real estate remains strong.

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
8

0
2

P
X
L

CHESTER, VIRGINIA | INDUSTRIAL

INDUSTRIAL ATTRIBUTES

PORTFOLIO CONCENTRATION (%)1

Memphis, TN

Houston, TX

Kennewick, WA

Detroit, MI

Nashville, TN

Jackson, MS

Atlanta, GA

New York, NY

St. Louis, MO

Greenville, SC

8.4%

7.3%

7.0%

5.5%

5.1%

3.3%

3.1%

2.7%

2.4%

SCHEDULED LEASE ESCALATIONS2

18%

n Annual Escalations
n Flat Rent
n Other Escalations
n Stepdown

71%

INDUSTRIAL STRATEGY FOCUS

n Single-tenant, net-leased facilities

n Primarily warehouse and bulk distribution facilities,

easily repurposed for other users

n Partner with developers on build-to-suits and select

development opportunities

n Lease term range generally 5–20 years

n Select primary and secondary markets

n Realize value of specific assets in portfolio when appropriate

1 As a % of GAAP rent, excluding termination income, for consolidated industrial properties
owned as of 12/31/2018.
2 Based on 12 months consolidated cash rent for single-tenant industrial leases (properties

greater than 70% leased) owned as of 12/31/2018. Excludes rents from prior tenants.

3 Weighted-Average Lease Term. Cash basis for consolidated industrial properties owned as of

12/31/2018.

4 Based on gross book value of real estate assets as of 12/31/2018; excludes held for sale assets.
5 As a % of square footage for all industrial properties owned as of 12/31/2018.
6 2018 NOI for consolidated industrial properties owned as of 12/31/2018.

INDUSTRIAL
SNAPSHOT

(12/31/2018)

89
Properties

41.4M

9.6 years
WALT3

71%
Industrial Exposure4

15 years
Average Building Age5

96%
Leased

32%
Investment-Grade1

$174.3M

NOI6

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
8

0
2

P
X
L

ROBUST REPOSITIONING EFFORTS

As part of our larger portfolio strategy, we accelerated our 2018 dis-
position plan through the sale of $1.1 billion of office and other non-
core assets. This included the sale of a 21-property office portfolio to a
newly-formed joint venture for approximately $726 million. We have
acquired a 20% interest and are managing the joint venture. Our gains
on sale in 2018 totaled $253 million.

In 2019, we expect to continue to significantly reduce our office ex-
posure and anticipate disposing of approximately $400 million to
$500 million of primarily office and other non-core assets. Thereaf-
ter, over the coming years, we will prudently sell our remaining non-
core assets with the focus on maximizing value on an individual asset
basis. Through our continued sales efforts, we can expect capital ex-
penditures and leasing costs to decline considerably over time, which
will enhance our free cash flow.

Our portfolio continues to evolve to consist of high-quality, single-
tenant, net-leased industrial assets, in large part due to the progress we
have made on the disposition and investment fronts in recent years. We
are ready for another productive year and look forward to moving closer
to completing our portfolio transition.

PORTFOLIO
EVOLUTION 1

27%

71%

2018

48%

49%

2017

42%

54%

PORTFOLIO REPOSITIONING

Property Disposition Volume and Cash Capitalization Rate

2016

n Industrial
n Office
n Other

$1,500

$1,300

$1,100

$900

$700

$500

$300

)
s
n
o

i
l
l
i

m
n

$
(

7.7%

8.4%

$1,061

7.2%

6.5%

6.3%

3.6%

5.1%

$663

$100

$176

$167

$282

$265

$242

1 Based on gross book value of real
estate assets for respective year
end; excludes held for sale assets.

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

10%

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
8

0
2

P
X
L

PROACTIVE ASSET MANAGEMENT

Our asset management team is highly focused on working alongside our tenants to create and maintain
positive working relationships and occupancy solutions. We believe tenant retention is fundamental to
sustaining and enhancing shareholder value over the long-term. Consistent leasing activity and occupan-
cy reflect our proactive approach to asset management and successful investment underwriting.

In 2018, solid leasing volume of approximately two million square feet resulted in 29 new or extend-
ed leases, with industrial cash rents increasing 4% and office cash rents remaining flat. At year end, our
portfolio was 95.1% leased with a weighted-average lease term of 8.9 years. Our lease expirations remain
well-balanced, and we continue to be proactive in our leasing efforts for 2019 expirations and beyond.
For 2019, we have already addressed or are in the process of addressing a large portion of our lease rollover
through sale or lease extension.

WELL-LADDERED EXPIRATION SCHEDULE1

SCHEDULED RENT INCREASES2

8.8%

9.1%

5.7% 5.9%

3.6%

2.3%

11.4%

15%

5.3% 5.4%

4.4%

18%

)
s
’
0
0
0
n

$
(

$35,000

$30,000

$25,000

$20,000

$15,000

$10,000

$5,000

2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028

n Q4 2018

n Annual

Increases

n Flat

n Other

Scheduled
Increases

n Stepdowns

65%

1 As a % of consolidated GAAP rent, excluding termination income, for single-tenant leases in place at 12/31/2018.
2 Based on 12 months consolidated cash rent for single-tenant leases (properties greater than 70% leased) owned as of 12/31/2018.

Excludes parking operations and rents from prior tenants.

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
8

0
2

P
X
L

LEBANON, INDIANA | INDUSTRIAL

CAPITAL MARKETS

Advantageous Share Repurchase Program
Market volatility during 2018 created several opportunities where re-
purchasing our common shares was a compelling use of our capital.
We were active during this time and repurchased approximately 5.9
million shares at an average price of $8.05 per share. In November,
our Board of Trustees provided us further flexibility through the ap-
proval of an additional 10 million share repurchase authorization.
In our view, our share repurchase program remains a useful tool to
augment shareholder value when appropriate.

Attractive Balance Sheet
Our balance sheet is arguably the best it has ever been. Cash proceeds
from the office portfolio sale we announced in September provided
us the opportunity to pay off a substantial amount of debt in both
the third and fourth quarters. We ended the year with extremely low
leverage of 4.7 times net debt to Adjusted EBITDA. Leverage levels
may fluctuate during the year depending on the timing of sales and
purchases, but we expect to leverage to remain low in comparison to
recent years. While future asset purchases will largely be funded from
dispositions, we have balance sheet capacity and flexibility as needed to
capitalize on opportunities which may arise.

AT TRACTIVE
CREDIT
METRICS 1

$2.8B
Unencumbered Assets

71.5%

Unencumbered NOI

37.8%
Debt/Gross Assets

14.5%
Secured Debt/
Gross Assets

4.7x
Net Debt to
Adjusted EBITDA

$505M
Credit Facility Availability

1 As of 12/31/2018.

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
8

0
2

P
X
L

WINCHESTER, VIRGINIA | INDUSTRIAL

2018 FINANCIAL RESULTS

In 2018, we generated net income of $0.93 per diluted common share and Adjusted Company Funds
from Operations (FFO) of $0.96 cents per diluted common share. For 2019, net income guidance is
expected to be within a range of $1.36 to $1.40 per diluted common share and Adjusted Company FFO
guidance within a range of $0.75 to $0.79 per diluted common share. As we continue to refine our invest-
ment strategy, earnings dilution is to be expected from selling our office and other non-core assets, which
is reflected in our 2019 guidance.

In September of 2018, we announced that our dividend would be reset in 2019 in order to retain capital
and reinvest in growth opportunities. We believe the Board of Trustees’ prudent approach to setting a
new annual dividend rate of $0.41 per diluted common share will allow the company to retain and rein-
vest capital to achieve consistent and sustainable growth in earnings and net asset value.

We believe our evolution towards a single-tenant industrial net-lease REIT will provide for a more favorable
long-term growth profile, greater certainty of cash flows, and the opportunity for a better valuation. We look
forward to accomplishing the work required in 2019 to move us closer to our ideal industrial portfolio con-
struct. Thank you for your continued support and we look forward to another 25 prosperous years.

T. WILSON EGLIN

Chief Executive Officer, President and Trustee

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
8

0
2

P
X
L

GOODYEAR, ARIZONA | INDUSTRIAL

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10K

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018
or

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________________ to ________________
Commission File Number 1-12386

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation of organization)

13-3717318
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

One Penn Plaza, Suite 4015, New York, NY 10119-4015
(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)
(212) 692-7200
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class
Shares of beneficial interest, par value $0.0001 per share, classified
as Common Stock

6.50% Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock,
par value $0.0001 per share

Name of each exchange on which registered
New York Stock Exchange

New York Stock Exchange

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the
past 90 days. Yes

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation
No

S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not
be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any
amendment to this Form 10-K.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging
growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer
(Do not check if a smaller reporting
company)

Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes

The aggregate market value of the shares of beneficial interest, par value $0.0001 per share, classified as common stock (“common shares”) of Lexington Realty
Trust held by non-affiliates as of June 29, 2018, which was the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter, was $2,044,256,426
based on the closing price of the common shares on the New York Stock Exchange as of that date, which was $8.73 per share.

Number of common shares outstanding as of March 8, 2019 was 235,282,784.

Certain information contained in the Definitive Proxy Statement for Lexington Realty Trust's Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be held on May 21, 2019, is
incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K in response to Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Description

PART I

ITEM 1.

Business

ITEM 1A.

Risk Factors

ITEM 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

ITEM 2.

ITEM 3.

ITEM 4.

ITEM 5.

ITEM 6.

ITEM 7.

Properties

Legal Proceedings

Mine Safety Disclosures

PART II
Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity

Securities

Selected Financial Data

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

ITEM 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

ITEM 8.

ITEM 9.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

ITEM 9A.

Controls and Procedures

ITEM 9B.

Other Information

ITEM 10.

PART III
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

ITEM 11.

Executive Compensation

ITEM 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

ITEM 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

ITEM 14.

Principal Accounting Fees and Services

ITEM 15.

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

PART IV

Page

Introduction

Unless stated otherwise or the context otherwise requires, the “Company,” the “Trust,” “Lexington,” “we,” “our,” and “us”
refer collectively to Lexington Realty Trust and its consolidated subsidiaries. All of the Company's interests in properties are held,
and all property operating activities are conducted, through special purpose entities, which we refer to as property owner subsidiaries
or lender subsidiaries, which are separate and distinct legal entities, but in some instances are consolidated for financial statement
purposes and/or disregarded for income tax purposes.

When we use the term “REIT,” we mean real estate investment trust. All references to 2018, 2017 and 2016 refer to our fiscal
years ended, or the dates, as the context requires, December 31, 2018, December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

When we use the term “GAAP,” we mean United States generally accepted accounting principles in effect from time to time.

Cautionary Statements Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report, together with other statements and information publicly disseminated by us, contain certain forward-
looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Act, and
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. We intend such forward-looking statements
to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995 and include this statement for purposes of complying with these safe harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements,
which are based on certain assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by
use of the words “believes,” “expects,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “projects,” “may,” “plans,” “predicts,” “will,” “will
likely result” or similar expressions. Readers should not rely on forward-looking statements since they involve known and unknown
risks, uncertainties and other factors which are, in some cases, beyond our control and which could materially affect actual results,
performances or achievements. In particular, among the factors that could cause actual results, performances or achievements to
differ materially from current expectations, strategies or plans include, among others, those risks discussed below under “Risk
Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report and under “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly
release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements which may be made to reflect events or circumstances
after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Accordingly, there is no assurance that our expectations
will be realized.

Item 1. Business

General

PART I.

We are a Maryland real estate investment trust, qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, that owns a portfolio of
equity investments in single-tenant commercial properties, with a focus on industrial properties. A majority of these properties are
subject to net or similar leases, where the tenant bears all or substantially all of the costs, including cost increases, for real estate
taxes, utilities, insurance and ordinary repairs. However, certain leases provide that the landlord is responsible for certain operating
expenses.

As of December 31, 2018, we had equity ownership interests in approximately 135 consolidated real estate properties, located
in 34 states and containing an aggregate of approximately 47.6 million square feet of space, approximately 95.1% of which was
leased. In 2018, 2017 and 2016, no tenant/guarantor represented greater than 10% of our annual base rental revenue.

In addition to our shares of beneficial interest, par value $0.0001 per share, classified as common stock, which we refer to as
common shares, as of December 31, 2018, we had one outstanding class of beneficial interest classified as preferred stock, or preferred
shares, our 6.50% Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, or our Series C Preferred Shares.
Our common shares and Series C Preferred Shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, under the symbols “LXP”
and “LXPPRC”, respectively.

We elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, which
we refer to as the Code, commencing with our taxable year ended December 31, 1993. We intend to continue to qualify as a REIT.
If we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal corporate income taxes on our net taxable income
that is currently distributed to our common shareholders. We conduct certain taxable activities through our taxable REIT subsidiary,
Lexington Realty Advisors, Inc.

History

Lexington is structured as an umbrella partnership REIT, or UPREIT, as a portion of its business is conducted through its operating
partnership subsidiary, Lepercq Corporate Income Fund L.P., which we refer to as LCIF. Lexington is party to a funding agreement
with LCIF under which Lexington may be required to fund distributions made on account of partner interests in LCIF, which we
refer to as OP units. The UPREIT structure enables us to acquire properties through an operating partnership by issuing OP units to
a seller of property, as a form of consideration in exchange for the property. However, our credit agreement requires that we own at
least 95.5% of LCIF. The outstanding OP units not held by Lexington are generally redeemable for our common shares on a one OP
unit for approximately 1.13 common shares basis, or, at our election in certain instances, cash. As of December 31, 2018, there were
approximately 3.2 million OP units outstanding, other than OP units held by Lexington, which were convertible into approximately
3.6 million common shares, assuming redemptions are satisfied entirely with common shares.

Investment and Strategy

General. Our current business strategy is focused on enhancing our cash flow stability, growing our portfolio with attractive
leased industrial investments, reducing lease rollover risk and maintaining a strong and flexible balance sheet to allow us to act on
opportunities as they arise. To that end, during 2018, we continued to be an active seller of non-core assets such as office properties,
retail properties and vacant properties. In addition, we continued and will continue our efforts to increase the percentage of rents
from industrial assets. Our disposition of 21 office assets to a newly-formed joint venture, NNN Office JV L.P. (“NNN JV”), and
other disposition and acquisition activities during 2018, have resulted in an increase in our percentage of GAAP rent from industrial
assets to 65.4% as of December 31, 2018 from 44.3% as of December 31, 2017.

Regardless of capital market and economic conditions, we intend to stay focused on (1) enhancing operating results, (2) improving
portfolio quality through acquisitions of industrial assets and reducing risks associated with lease rollover, especially with respect
to non-core assets, (3) mitigating risks relating to interest rates and real estate cycles and (4) implementing strategies where our
management skills and real estate expertise can add value.

Investments. When opportunities arise, we intend to continue to acquire single-tenant net-leased industrial assets that we believe
will generate favorable returns. We focus on general purpose, well located, industrial assets that, we believe, will provide us with
greater long-term overall risk-adjusted returns then we would realize from making new acquisitions of office or other properties. We
believe industrial assets, as compared with office assets, provide for greater rental growth potential and less retenanting costs, We
seek to grow our portfolio primarily by (1) engaging in, or providing funds to, or partnering with, developers who are engaged in,
build-to-suit projects for single-tenant corporate users, (2) providing capital to corporations by buying properties and leasing them
back to the sellers under net or similar leases and (3) acquiring properties already subject to net or similar leases, including through
strategic transactions such as portfolio acquisitions and mergers with other real estate companies.

Our management has established a broad network of contacts to source investments, including brokers, developers and major
corporate tenants. We believe that our geographical diversification, acquisition experience and balance sheet strength will allow us
to continue to compete effectively for such investments. In addition, we seek to partner with developers on land parcels suitable for
development of industrial assets.

Prior to effecting any investment, our underwriting includes analyzing the (1) property's design, construction quality, efficiency,
functionality and location with respect to the immediate sub-market, city and region, (2) lease integrity with respect to term, rental
rate increases, tenant credit, corporate guarantees and property maintenance provisions, (3) present and anticipated conditions in the
local real estate market and (4) prospects for selling or re-leasing the property on favorable terms in the event of a vacancy. To the
extent of information publicly available or made available to us, we also evaluate each potential tenant's financial strength, growth
prospects and competitive position within its respective industry and each property's strategic location and function within a tenant's
operations or distribution systems. We believe that our comprehensive underwriting process is critical to the assessment of long-
term profitability of any investment by us.

Competition

There are numerous commercial developers, real estate companies, financial institutions, such as banks and insurance companies,
and other investors with greater financial or other resources that compete with us in seeking properties for acquisition and tenants
who will lease space in these properties. Furthermore, competition for industrial assets has increased in recent years. Our competitors
include other REITs, pension funds, banks, private companies and individuals.

Internal Growth and Effectively Managing Assets

Tenant Relations and Lease Compliance. We endeavor to maintain close contact with the tenants in the properties in which we
have an interest in order to understand their financial strength, operations and future real estate needs. We monitor the financial,
property maintenance and other lease obligations of the tenants in properties in which we have an interest, through a variety of means,
including periodic reviews of financial statements that we have access to and physical inspections of the properties.

Extending Lease Maturities. Our property owner subsidiaries seek to extend tenant leases in advance of the lease expiration in

order for us to maintain a balanced lease rollover schedule and high occupancy levels.

Revenue Enhancing Property Expansions. Our property owner subsidiaries undertake expansions of properties based on lease
requirements, tenant requirements or marketing opportunities. We believe that selective property expansions can provide attractive
rates of return.

Capital Recycling. Subject to regulatory and contractual requirements, we generally sell our interests in properties when we
believe that the return realized from selling a property will exceed the expected return from continuing to hold such property and/
or there is a better use of the capital to be received upon sale. We also focus our disposition efforts primarily on non-core assets such
as office, vacant, multi-tenant, retail and short-term leased assets and assets that are the only asset we own in a geographic location.

Occasionally, we provide seller financing as a means of efficiently disposing of an asset. As a result, if a buyer defaults under

the seller financing, we will once again be the owner of the underlying asset.

Conversion to Multi-Tenant. If one of our property owner subsidiaries is unable to renew a single-tenant lease or if it is unable
to find a replacement single tenant, we either attempt to sell our interest in the property or the property owner subsidiary may seek
to market the property for multi-tenant use. When appropriate, we seek to sell our interests in multi-tenant properties.

Property Management. From time to time, our property owner subsidiaries use property managers to manage certain properties.
Our property management joint venture with an unaffiliated third party manages the majority of these properties. We believe this
joint venture provides us with (1) better management of our assets, (2) better tenant relationships, (3) revenue-enhancing opportunities
and (4) cost efficiencies.

Financing Strategy

General. Since becoming a public company, our principal sources of financing have been the public and private equity and debt
markets, including property-specific debt, revolving loans, corporate level term loans, corporate bonds, issuance of common and
preferred equity, issuance of OP units and undistributed cash flows.

Property-Specific Debt. Our property owner subsidiaries seek non-recourse secured debt on a limited basis to mitigate tenant
credit risk and when credit tenant lease financing is available. Credit tenant lease financing allows us to significantly or fully leverage
the rental stream from an investment at, what we believe are, attractive rates.

Corporate Level Borrowings. We also use corporate level borrowings, such as revolving loans, term loans, and debt offerings.
We expect to continue to finance more of our operations with such corporate level borrowings as (1) non-recourse secured debt
matures and (2) such corporate level borrowings are available on favorable terms.

Balance Sheet Management. In recent years, we have retired non-recourse mortgage debt with proceeds from recourse corporate

level borrowings and sales. Our objective is to maintain a strong balance sheet to provide financial flexibility.

Common Share Issuances

From time to time, we raise capital by issuing common shares through (1) at-the-market offering programs, (2) underwritten
public offerings, (3) block trades and (4) our direct share purchase plan. The proceeds from our common share offerings are generally
used for working capital, including to fund investments and to retire indebtedness.

Share Repurchases

We have made, and may continue to make, repurchases of our common and preferred shares in individual transactions when we
believe it is advantageous to do so, including when the discount to our net asset value or the liquidation preference, as the case may
be, is attractive. Our share repurchase program authorized in 2015 had approximately 10.7 million common shares available for
repurchase as of December 31, 2018. We repurchased and retired 5.9 million common shares in 2018.

Advisory Contracts

We provide, and have provided, advisory services to various net-lease investors, including institutional investors and high net-

worth individuals.

Environmental Matters

Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations, an owner of real property
may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances at, on, in or under such property as
well as certain other potential costs relating to hazardous or toxic substances.

Summary of 2018 Transactions and Recent Developments

The following summarizes certain of our transactions during 2018, including transactions disclosed elsewhere and in our other

periodic reports.

Investments/Capital Recycling. With respect to acquisitions/investments, we:

–

purchased eight industrial assets for an aggregate cost of $315.6 million.

disposed of 21 office assets to NNN JV for an aggregate price of $725.8 million and acquired a 20% equity interest
in NNN JV for an aggregate cost of $53.7 million.

disposed of our interests in 25 additional consolidated properties to unaffiliated third parties for an aggregate gross
disposition price of $335.3 million.

received $4.3 million in connection with the sale of a non-consolidated investment.

Leasing. We entered into 29 new leases and lease extensions encompassing an aggregate 1.9 million square feet. Our portfolio

was 95.1% leased as of December 31, 2018.

Financing/Equity. With respect to financing activities, we:

–

repaid $160.0 million, net under the unsecured revolving credit facility.

repaid the $300.0 million term loan that was scheduled to mature in 2020.

retired an aggregate of $118.0 million in property non-recourse mortgage debt, including debt encumbering assets
sold to NNN JV.

obtained $25.9 million of non-recourse mortgage financing with a fixed interest rate of 5.4%, which matures in
November 2032 and is secured by an industrial property in Warren, MI.

repurchased and retired approximately 5.9 million common shares at an average price of $8.05 per common share.

amended our unsecured credit facility to remove LCIF as a borrower, which resulted in their automatic release as
a guarantor of our outstanding debt securities,

See “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Part I, Item 7 of this Annual

Report for more detail regarding the Company's 2018 transaction activity.

Subsequent to December 31, 2018, we:

–

sold a consolidated industrial property for $79.3 million.

acquired two industrial assets for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $58.0 million.

repurchased and retired 441,581 common shares at an average price of $8.13 per common share.

replaced our revolving credit facility and 2021 term loan with a new revolving credit facility and the continuation
of the 2021 term loan, which extended the maturity of the revolving credit facility to February 2023 and reduced
the applicable margin rates on the revolving credit facility and 2021 term loan.

entered into an agreement to purchase upon completion the expansion of our property in Richland, Washington
for $67.0 million.

declared a quarterly common share dividend of $0.1025 per common share.

Other

Employees. As of December 31, 2018, we had 60 full-time employees. Lexington Realty Trust is a master employer and employee

costs are allocated to subsidiaries as applicable.

Industry Segments. We operate in one industry segment, primarily single-tenant real estate assets.

Web Site. Our Internet address is www.lxp.com. We make available, free of charge, on or through the Investors section of our
web site or by contacting our Investor Relations Department, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q
and Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Exchange Act, as well as proxy statements, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish
it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. Also posted on our web site, and available in print upon request of any
shareholder to our Investor Relations Department, are our declaration of trust and by-laws, charters for the Audit Committee,
Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of our Board of Trustees, our Corporate
Governance Guidelines, and our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics governing our trustees, officers and employees (which contains
our whistle blower procedures). Within the time period required by the SEC and the NYSE, we will post on our web site any
amendment to the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and any waiver applicable to any of our trustees or executive officers. In
addition, our web site includes information concerning purchases and sales of our equity securities by our executive officers and
trustees as well as disclosure relating to certain non-GAAP financial measures (as defined in the SEC's Regulation G) that we may
make public orally, telephonically, by webcast, by broadcast or by similar means from time to time. The SEC maintains an internet
site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding LXP at http://www.sec.gov. Information
contained on our web site or the web site of any other person is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report or any of our
other filings with or documents furnished to the SEC.

Our Investor Relations Department can be contacted at Lexington Realty Trust, One Penn Plaza, Suite 4015, New York, New

York 10119-4015, Attn: Investor Relations, by telephone: (212) 692-7200, or by e-mail: ir@lxp.com.

Principal Executive Offices. Our principal executive offices are located at One Penn Plaza, Suite 4015, New York, New York

10119-4015; our telephone number is (212) 692-7200.

NYSE CEO Certification. Our Chief Executive Officer made an unqualified certification to the NYSE with respect to our

compliance with the NYSE corporate governance listing standards in 2018.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Set forth below are material factors that may adversely affect our business and operations.

Risks Related to Our Business

We are subject to risks involving our leases and tenants.

We focus our acquisition activities on real estate properties that are net leased to single tenants, and certain of our tenants and/
or their guarantors constitute a significant percentage of our base rental revenues. Therefore, the financial failure of, or other default
by, a single tenant under its lease is likely to cause a significant or complete reduction in the operating cash flow generated by the
property leased to that tenant and might decrease the value of that property and result in a non-cash impairment charge. If the tenant
represents a significant portion of our base rental revenues, the impact on our financial position may be material. Further, in any
such event, our property owner subsidiary will be responsible for 100% of the operating costs following a vacancy at a single-tenant
building. Upon the expiration or other termination of leases that are currently in place, the property owner subsidiary may not be
able to re-lease the vacant property at all or at a comparable lease rate without incurring additional expenditures in connection with
the re-leasing, which may be material in amount.

Under current bankruptcy law, a tenant can generally assume or reject a lease within a certain number of days of filing its
bankruptcy petition. If a tenant rejects the lease, a landlord's damages, subject to availability of funds from the bankruptcy estate,
are generally limited to the greater of (1) one year's rent and (2) the rent for 15% of the remaining term of the lease, not to exceed
three years.

Certain of our leases may permit tenants to terminate the leases to which they are a party.

Certain of our leases contain tenant termination options, including economic discontinuance options, that permit the tenants to
terminate their leases. While these termination options generally require a termination payment by the tenants, in most cases, the
termination payments are less than the total remaining expected rental revenue. The termination of a lease by a tenant may impair
the value of the property. In addition, we will be responsible for 100% of the operating costs following the termination by any such
tenant and subsequent vacating of the property, and we will incur re-leasing costs.

Our ability to fully control the maintenance of our net-leased properties may be limited.

The tenants of our net-leased properties are responsible for maintenance and other day-to-day management of the properties. If
a property is not adequately maintained in accordance with the terms of the applicable lease, we may incur expenses for deferred
maintenance or other liabilities once the property is no longer leased. We generally visit our properties on an annual basis, but these
visits are not comprehensive inspections and deferred maintenance items may go unnoticed. While our leases generally provide for
recourse against the tenant in these instances, a bankrupt or financially-troubled tenant may be more likely to defer maintenance,
and it may be more difficult to enforce remedies against such a tenant.

Our tenants' ability to successfully operate their businesses may affect their ability to pay rent and maintain their leased property.

To the extent that tenants are unable to operate the property on a financially successful basis, their ability to pay rent to us may
be adversely affected. Although we endeavor to monitor, on an ongoing basis, compliance by tenants with their lease obligations
and other factors which could affect the financial performance of our properties, such monitoring may not always ascertain or forestall
deterioration, either in the condition or value of a property or in the financial circumstances of a tenant.

You should not rely on the credit ratings of our tenants.

Some of our tenants, guarantors and/or their parent or sponsor entities are rated by certain rating agencies. In certain instances,
we may disclose the credit ratings of our tenants or their parent or sponsor entities even though those parent or sponsor entities are
not liable for the obligations of the tenant or guarantor under the lease. Any such credit ratings are subject to ongoing evaluation by
these credit rating agencies and we cannot assure you that any such ratings will not be changed or withdrawn by these rating agencies
in the future if, in their judgment, circumstances warrant. If these rating agencies assign a lower-than-expected rating or reduce or
withdraw, or indicate that they may reduce or withdraw, the credit rating of a tenant, guarantor or its parent entity, the value of our
investment in any properties leased by such tenant could significantly decline.

Our assets may be subject to impairment charges.

We periodically evaluate our real estate investments and other assets for impairment indicators. The judgment regarding the
existence of impairment indicators is based on GAAP, which include a variety of factors such as market conditions, the status of
significant leases, the financial condition of major tenants and other factors that could affect the cash flow or value of an investment.
Based on this evaluation, we may from time to time take non-cash impairment charges, which could affect the implementation of
our current business strategy. These impairments could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of
operations.

Furthermore, we may take an impairment charge on a property subject to a non-recourse secured mortgage which reduces the
book value of such property to its fair value, which may be below the balance of the mortgage on our balance sheet. Upon foreclosure
or other disposition, we may be required to recognize a gain on debt satisfaction equal to the difference between the fair value of the
property and the balance of the mortgage.

Our real estate development activities are subject to additional risks.

In 2017, we entered into a joint venture that acquired a developable parcel of land. Development activities generally require various
government and other approvals, which the joint venture may not receive. In addition, the joint venture is subject to the following
risks associated with development activities:

• Unsuccessful development opportunities could cause us to incur direct expenses;

• Construction costs of a project may exceed original estimates, possibly making the project less profitable than

originally estimated or unprofitable;

• Time required to complete the construction of a project or to lease up the completed project may be greater than

originally anticipated, thereby adversely affecting our cash flow and liquidity;

• Occupancy rates and rents of a completed project may not be sufficient to make the project profitable; and

•

Favorable financing sources to fund the joint venture's development activities may not be available.

A tenant’s bankruptcy proceeding may result in the re-characterization of related sale-leaseback transactions or in the
restructuring of the tenant's payment obligations to us, either of which could adversely affect our financial condition.

We have entered and may continue to enter into sale-leaseback transactions, whereby we purchase a property and then lease the
same property back to the person from whom we purchased it. In the event of the bankruptcy of a tenant, a transaction structured as
a sale-leaseback may be re-characterized as either a financing or a joint venture. As a result of the foregoing, the re-characterization
of a sale-leaseback transaction could adversely affect our financial condition, cash flow and the amount available for distributions
to our shareholders.

If the sale-leaseback were re-characterized as a financing, we might not be considered the owner of the property, and as a result
would have the status of a creditor in relation to the tenant. In that event, we would no longer have the right to sell or encumber our
ownership interest in the property. Instead, we would have a claim against the tenant for the amounts owed under the lease, with the
claim arguably secured by the property. The tenant/debtor might have the ability to propose a plan restructuring the term, interest
rate and amortization schedule of its outstanding balance. If confirmed by the bankruptcy court, we could be bound by the new terms
and prevented from foreclosing our lien on the property. If the sale-leaseback were re-characterized as a joint venture, our tenant
and we could be treated as co-venturers with regard to the property. As a result, we could be held liable, under some circumstances,
for debts incurred by the tenant relating to the property.

A significant portion of our leases are long-term and do not have fair market rental rate adjustments, which could negatively
impact our income and reduce the amount of funds available to make distributions to shareholders.

A significant portion of our rental income comes from long-term net leases, which generally provide the tenant greater discretion
in using the leased property than ordinary property leases, such as the right to freely sublease the property, to make alterations in the
leased premises and to terminate the lease prior to its expiration under specified circumstances. Furthermore, net leases typically
have longer lease terms and, thus, there is an increased risk that contractual rental increases in future years will fail to result in fair
market rental rates during those years. If we do not accurately judge the potential for increases in market rental rates when negotiating
these long-term leases or if we are unable to obtain any increases in rental rates over the terms of our leases, significant increases in
future property operating costs, to the extent not covered under the net leases could result in us receiving less than fair value from
these leases. As a result, our income and distributions to our shareholders could be lower than they would otherwise be if we did not
engage in long-term net leases.

In addition, increases in interest rates may also negatively impact the value of our properties that are subject to long-term leases.
While a significant number of our net leases provide for annual escalations in the rental rate, the increase in interest rates may outpace
the annual escalations.

Our interests in loans receivable, if any, are subject to delinquency, foreclosure and loss.

Our interests in loans receivable, if any, are generally non-recourse and secured by real estate properties owned by borrowers
that were unable to obtain similar financing from a commercial bank. These loans are subject to many risks including delinquency.
The ability of a borrower to repay a loan secured by a real estate property is typically and primarily dependent upon the successful
operation of such property rather than upon the existence of independent income or assets of the borrower. If a borrower were to
default on a loan, it is possible that we would not recover the full value of the loan as the collateral may be non-performing.

We face uncertainties relating to lease renewals and re-letting of space.

Upon the expiration of current leases for space located in properties in which we have an interest, our property owner subsidiaries
may not be able to re-let all or a portion of such space, or the terms of re-letting (including the cost of concessions to tenants and
leasing commissions) may be less favorable than current lease terms or market rates. If our property owner subsidiaries are unable
to promptly re-let all or a substantial portion of the space located in their respective properties, or if the rental rates a property owner
subsidiary receives upon re-letting are significantly lower than current rates, our earnings and ability to satisfy our debt service
obligations and to make expected distributions to our shareholders may be adversely affected due to the resulting reduction in rent
receipts and increase in property operating costs. There can be no assurance that our property owner subsidiaries will be able to retain
tenants in any of our properties upon the expiration of leases.

We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flow to meet our debt service obligations and to pay distributions on our common
and preferred shares.

Our ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness, to make distributions on our common and preferred shares
and to fund our operations, working capital and capital expenditures, depends on our ability to generate cash in the future. To a certain
extent, our cash flow is subject to general economic, industry, financial, competitive, operating, legislative, regulatory and other
factors, many of which are beyond our control. We cannot assure you that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from
operations or that future sources of cash will be available to us in an amount sufficient to enable us to pay amounts due on our
indebtedness or to make distributions on our common and preferred shares and fund our other liquidity needs. Additionally, if we
incur additional indebtedness in connection with future acquisitions or development projects or for any other purpose, our debt
service obligations could increase.

We may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness on or before maturity. Our ability to refinance our indebtedness
or obtain additional financing will depend on, among other things, our financial condition and market conditions at the time and
restrictions in the agreements governing our indebtedness.

As a result, we may not be able to refinance any of our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. If we do not
generate sufficient cash flow from operations, and additional borrowings or refinancings or proceeds of asset sales or other sources
of cash are not available to us, we may not have sufficient cash to enable us to meet all of our obligations. Accordingly, if we cannot
service our indebtedness, we may have to take actions such as seeking additional equity, or delaying strategic acquisitions and
alliances or capital expenditures, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our operations. We cannot assure you that we
will be able to effect any of these actions on commercially reasonable terms, or at all.

Our inability to carry out our growth strategy could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

Our growth strategy is based on the acquisition and development of additional properties and related assets. In the context of
our business plan, “development” generally means an expansion or renovation of an existing property or the financing and/or
acquisition of a newly constructed build-to-suit property. For newly constructed build-to-suit properties, we may (1) provide a
developer with either a combination of financing for construction of a build-to-suit property or a commitment to acquire a property
upon completion of construction of a build-to-suit property and commencement of rent from the tenant, (2) acquire a property subject
to a lease and engage a developer to complete construction of a build-to-suit property as required by the lease, or (3) partner with a
developer to acquire an undeveloped parcel of land and pursue build-to-suit opportunities.

Our plan to grow through the acquisition and development of new properties could be adversely affected by trends in the real
estate and financing businesses. The consummation of any future acquisitions will be subject to satisfactory completion of an extensive
valuation analysis and due diligence review and to the negotiation of definitive documentation. Our ability to implement our strategy
may be impeded because we may have difficulty finding new properties and investments at attractive prices that meet our investment
criteria, negotiating with new or existing tenants or securing acceptable financing. If we are unable to carry out our strategy, our
financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. Acquisitions of additional properties entail the risk that
investments will fail to perform in accordance with expectations, including operating and leasing expectations.

Some of our acquisitions and developments may be financed using the proceeds of periodic equity or debt offerings, lines of
credit or other forms of secured or unsecured financing that may result in a risk that permanent financing for newly acquired projects
might not be available or would be available only on disadvantageous terms. If permanent debt or equity financing is not available
on acceptable terms to refinance acquisitions undertaken without permanent financing, further acquisitions may be curtailed, or cash
available to satisfy our debt service obligations and distributions to shareholders may be adversely affected.

Our acquisition and disposition activity may lead to dilution.

Our asset strategy is to increase our investment in general purpose, well located industrial assets and reduce our exposure to all
other asset types. We believe this strategy will lessen capital expenditures over time and mitigate revenue reductions on renewals
and re-tenanting. To implement this strategy, we have been selling certain office assets, which generally have higher capitalization
rates, and buying industrial properties, which, in the current competitive market, generally have lower capitalization rates. This
strategy impacts growth in the short-term period. There can be no assurance that the implementation of our strategy will lead to
improved results or that we will be able to execute our strategy as contemplated or on terms acceptable to us.

From time to time, we announce potential lease, financing, disposition or investment commitments or transactions, which may
not be consummated on the terms we announce or at all.

We publicly communicate potential lease, financing, disposition and investment commitments or transactions in our public
documents filed with or furnished to the SEC and press releases and on conference calls with analysts and investors. We can give
no assurances that any of these commitments or transactions will be consummated to our expectations or at all.

Acquisition activities may not produce expected results and may be affected by outside factors.

Acquisitions of commercial properties entail certain risks, such as (1) underwriting assumptions, including occupancy, rental
rates and expenses, may differ from estimates, (2) the properties may become subject to environmental liabilities that we were
unaware of at the time we acquired the property despite any environmental testing, (3) we may have difficulty obtaining financing
on acceptable terms or paying the operating expenses and debt service associated with acquired properties prior to sufficient occupancy
and (4) projected exit strategies may not come to fruition due to a variety of factors such as market conditions and/or tenant credit
conditions at the time of dispositions.

We may not be successful in identifying suitable real estate properties or other assets that meet our acquisition criteria. We may
also fail to complete acquisitions or investments on satisfactory terms. Failure to identify or complete acquisitions could slow our
growth, which could, in turn, have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We face certain risks associated with our build-to-suit activities.

From time to time, we engage in, or provide capital to developers who are engaged in, build-to-suit activities. We face uncertainties
associated with a developer's performance and timely completion of a project, including the performance or timely completion by
contractors and subcontractors. A developer's performance may be affected or delayed by their own actions or conditions beyond
the developer's control. If a developer, contractor or subcontractor fails to perform, we may resort to legal action to compel
performance, remove the developer or rescind the purchase or construction contract. Legal action may cause further delays and our
costs may not be reimbursed.

We may incur additional risks when we make periodic progress payments or other advances to developers before completion
of construction. These and other factors can result in increased costs of a project or loss of our investment. We also rely on third-
party construction managers and/or engineers to monitor the construction activities.

Upon completion of construction, we are generally responsible to the tenant for any warranty claims. While we generally have
a warranty from the developer or general contractor that was responsible for construction backstopping our warranty obligations to
the tenant, we are subject to the risk of enforcement of such developer or general contractor warranty.

We rely on rental income and expense projections and estimates of the fair market value of a property upon completion of
construction when agreeing upon a purchase price at the time we acquire the property. If our projections are inaccurate or markets
change, we may pay more than the fair value of a property.

In addition, the rental rates for a new build-to-suit project are generally derived from the cost to construct the project and may

not equal a fair market lease rate for older existing properties in the same market.

Our multi-tenant properties expose us to additional risks.

Our multi-tenant properties involve risks not typically encountered in real estate properties which are operated by or for a single
tenant. The ownership of multi-tenant properties could expose us to the risk that a sufficient number of suitable tenants may not be
found to enable the property to operate profitably and provide a return to us. This risk may be compounded by the failure of existing
tenants to satisfy their obligations due to various factors. These risks, in turn, could cause a material adverse impact to our results
of operations and business.

Multi-tenant properties are also subject to tenant turnover and fluctuation in occupancy rates, which could affect our operating
results. Furthermore, multi-tenant properties expose us to the risk of potential "CAM slippage," which may occur when the actual
cost of taxes, insurance and maintenance at the property exceeds the operating expenses paid by tenants and/or the amounts budgeted.

We face possible liability relating to environmental matters.

Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations, as an owner of real property,
our property owner subsidiaries may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances at,
on, in or under the properties in which we have an interest as well as certain other potential costs relating to hazardous or toxic
substances. These liabilities may include government fines and penalties and damages for injuries to persons and adjacent property.
These laws may impose liability without regard to whether we knew of, or were responsible for, the presence or disposal of those
substances. This liability may be imposed on our property owner subsidiaries in connection with the activities of an operator of, or
tenant at, the property. The cost of any required remediation, removal, fines or personal or property damages, and our liability
therefore, could be significant and could exceed the value of the property and/or our aggregate assets. In addition, the presence of
those substances, or the failure to properly dispose of or remove those substances, may adversely affect a property owner subsidiary's
ability to sell or rent that property or to borrow using that property as collateral, which, in turn, would reduce our revenues and ability
to satisfy our debt service obligations and to make distributions.

A property can also be adversely affected either through physical contamination or by virtue of an adverse effect upon value
attributable to the migration of hazardous or toxic substances, or other contaminants that have or may have emanated from other
properties. Although the tenants of the properties in which we have an interest are primarily responsible for any environmental
damages and claims related to the leased premises, in the event of the bankruptcy or inability of any of the tenants of the properties
in which we have an interest to satisfy any obligations with respect to the property leased to that tenant, our property owner subsidiary
may be required to satisfy such obligations. In addition, we may be held directly liable for any such damages or claims irrespective
of the provisions of any lease.

From time to time, in connection with the conduct of our business, our property owner subsidiaries authorize the preparation of
Phase I environmental reports and, when recommended, Phase II environmental reports, with respect to their properties. There can
be no assurance that these environmental reports will reveal all environmental conditions at the properties in which we have an
interest or that the following will not expose us to material liability in the future:

•

the discovery of previously unknown environmental conditions;

changes in law;

activities of tenants; or

activities relating to properties in the vicinity of the properties in which we have an interest.

Changes in laws increasing the potential liability for environmental conditions existing on properties or increasing the restrictions
on discharges or other conditions may result in significant unanticipated expenditures or may otherwise adversely affect the operations
of the tenants of the properties in which we have an interest, which could adversely affect our financial condition or results of
operations.

From time to time we are involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business.

Legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business require time and effort. The outcomes of legal proceedings are
subject to significant uncertainty. In the event that we are unsuccessful defending or prosecuting these proceedings, as applicable,
we may incur a judgment or fail to realize an award of damages that could have an adverse effect on our financial condition.

Uninsured losses or a loss in excess of insured limits could adversely affect our financial condition.

We carry comprehensive liability, fire, extended coverage and rent loss insurance on certain of the properties in which we have
an interest, with policy specifications and insured limits that we believe are customary for similar properties. However, with respect
to those properties where the leases do not provide for abatement of rent under any circumstances, we generally do not maintain rent
loss insurance. In addition, certain of our leases require the tenant to maintain all insurance on the property, and the failure of the
tenant to maintain the proper insurance could adversely impact our investment in a property in the event of a loss. Furthermore, there
are certain types of losses, such as losses resulting from wars, terrorism or certain acts of God, that generally are not insured because
they are either uninsurable or not economically insurable. Should an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occur, we
could lose capital invested in a property as well as the anticipated future revenues from a property, while remaining obligated for
any mortgage indebtedness or other financial obligations related to the property. Any loss of these types could adversely affect our
financial condition and results of operations.

Future terrorist attacks, military conflicts and unrest in various parts of the world could have a material adverse effect on general
economic conditions, consumer confidence and market liquidity.

Terrorist attacks, ongoing and future military conflicts and the continued unrest in various parts of the world may affect commodity
prices and interest rates, among other things. An increase in interest rates may increase our costs of borrowing, leading to a reduction
in our earnings. Instability in the price of oil will also cause fluctuations in our operating costs, which may not be reimbursed by our
tenants. Also, terrorist acts could result in significant damages to, or loss of, our properties or the value thereof.

We and the tenants of the properties in which we have an interest may be unable to obtain adequate insurance coverage on
acceptable economic terms for losses resulting from acts of terrorism. Our lenders may require that we carry terrorism insurance
even if we do not believe this insurance is necessary or cost effective. We may also be prohibited under the applicable lease from
passing all or a portion of the cost of such insurance through to the tenant. Should an act of terrorism result in an uninsured loss or
a loss in excess of insured limits, we could lose capital invested in a property as well as the anticipated future revenues from a
property, while our property owner subsidiary remains obligated for any mortgage indebtedness or other financial obligations related
to the property. Any loss of these types could adversely affect our financial condition.

Cybersecurity risks and cyber incidents may adversely affect our business by causing a disruption to our operations, a compromise
or corruption of our confidential information, misappropriation of assets and/or damage to our business relationships, all of
which could negatively impact our financial results.

A cyber incident is considered to be any adverse event that threatens the confidentiality, integrity or availability of our information
resources. These incidents may be an intentional attack or an unintentional event and could involve gaining unauthorized access to
our information systems for purposes of misappropriating assets, stealing confidential information, corrupting data or causing
operational disruption. The result of these incidents may include disrupted operations, misstated or unreliable financial data, liability
for stolen assets or information, increased cybersecurity protection and insurance costs, litigation and damage to our tenant, investor
and/or vendor relationships. As our reliance on technology has increased, so have the risks posed to our information systems, both
internal and those we have outsourced. Any processes, procedures and internal controls that we implement, as well as our increased
awareness of the nature and extent of a risk of a cyber incident, do not guarantee that our financial results, operations, business
relationships or confidential information will not be negatively impacted by such an incident.

Networks and information technology throughout the world and in companies of all sizes are threatened by cybersecurity risks
on a regular basis. We must continuously monitor and develop our networks and information technology to prevent, detect, address
and mitigate the risk of unauthorized access, misuse, computer viruses and other events that could have a security impact. Insider
or employee cyber and security threats are increasingly a concern for all companies, including ours. In addition, social engineering
and phishing are a particular concern for companies with employees. We are continuously working to install new, and to upgrade
our existing, network and information technology systems and to provide employee awareness training around phishing, malware
and other cyber risks to ensure that we are protected, to the greatest extent possible, against cyber risks and security breaches.
However, such upgrades, new technology and training may not be sufficient to protect us from all risks.

As a smaller company, we use third-party vendors to assist us with our network and information technology requirements. While
we carefully select these third-party vendors, we cannot control their actions. Any problems caused by these third parties, including
those resulting from breakdowns or other disruptions in communication services provided by a vendor, failure of a vendor to handle
current or higher volumes, cyber attacks and security breaches at a vendor could adversely affect our operations.

Competition may adversely affect our ability to purchase properties.

There are numerous commercial developers, real estate companies, such as other REITs, financial institutions, such as banks
and insurance companies, and other investors, such as pension funds, private companies and individuals, with greater financial and
other resources than we have that compete with us in seeking investments and tenants. Due to our focus on single-tenant properties
located throughout the United States, and because some competitors are often locally and/or regionally focused, we do not always
encounter the same competitors in each market. This competition may result in a higher cost for properties and lower returns and
impact our ability to grow.

Our failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting could have a material adverse effect on our business,
operating results and share price.

Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires annual management assessments of the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting. Our management previously identified and disclosed a material weakness in the effectiveness of
our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016. We have determined that our remediation plan eliminated this
weakness, but we cannot assure you that our controls will prevent this or other weaknesses from arising in the future. If we fail to
maintain the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting in the future, as such standards may be modified, supplemented
or amended from time to time, we will be required to disclose such failure, and our financial reporting may not be relied on by
investors. Moreover, effective internal control is necessary for us to produce reliable financial reports and to maintain our qualification
as a REIT and is important in helping prevent financial fraud. If we cannot provide reliable financial reports or prevent fraud, our
business and operating results could be harmed, our REIT qualification could be jeopardized, investors could lose confidence in our
reported financial information, and the trading price of our debt and equity securities could drop significantly.

We may have limited control over our joint venture investments.

Our joint venture investments involve risks not otherwise present for investments made solely by us, including the possibility
that our partner might, at any time, become bankrupt, have different interests or goals than we do, or take action contrary to our
expectations, its previous instructions or our instructions, requests, policies or objectives, including our policy with respect to
maintaining our qualification as a REIT. Other risks of joint venture investments include impasses on decisions, such as a sale,
because neither we nor our partner has full control over the joint venture. Also, there is no limitation under our organizational
documents as to the amount of funds that may be invested in joint ventures.

Our ability to change our portfolio is limited because real estate investments are illiquid.

Investments in real estate are relatively illiquid and, therefore, our ability to change our portfolio promptly in response to changed
conditions is limited. Our Board of Trustees may establish investment criteria or limitations as it deems appropriate, but currently
does not limit the number or type of properties in which we may seek to invest or on the concentration of investments in any one
geographic region.

Our reported financial results may be adversely affected by changes in accounting principles applicable to us and the tenants of
properties in which we have an interest.

GAAP is subject to interpretation by various bodies formed to promulgate and interpret appropriate accounting principles such
as the Financial Accounting Standards Board. A change in these principles or interpretations could have a significant effect on our
reported financial results, could affect the reporting of transactions completed before the announcement of a change and could affect
the business practices and decisions of the tenants of properties in which we have an interest.

We have engaged and may engage in hedging transactions that may limit gains or result in losses.

We have used derivatives to hedge certain of our variable-rate liabilities. As of December 31, 2018, we had aggregate interest
rate swap agreements on $255.0 million of borrowings. The counterparties of these arrangements are major financial institutions;
however, we are exposed to credit risk in the event of non-performance or default by the counterparties. Further, additional risks,
including losses on a hedge position, may reduce the return on our investments. Such losses may exceed the amount invested in such
instruments. We may also have to pay certain costs, such as transaction fees or breakage costs, related to hedging transactions.

Our Board of Trustees may change our investment policy without shareholders' approval.

Subject to our fundamental investment policy to maintain our qualification as a REIT and invest in core assets, our Board of
Trustees will determine our investment and financing policies, growth strategy and our debt, capitalization, distribution, acquisition,
disposition and operating policies.

Our Board of Trustees may revise or amend these strategies and policies at any time without a vote by shareholders. Changes
made by our Board of Trustees may not serve the interests of debt or equity security holders and could adversely affect our financial
condition or results of operations, including our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations, distribute cash to shareholders and
qualify as a REIT. Accordingly, shareholders' control over changes in our strategies and policies is limited to the election of trustees.

We are dependent upon our key personnel.

We are dependent upon key personnel whose continued service is not guaranteed. We are dependent on certain of our executive
officers for business direction. The employment agreements with each of T. Wilson Eglin, our Chief Executive Officer and President,
E. Robert Roskind, our Chairman, and Patrick Carroll, our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer, expired
in January 2018.

As part of our succession planning, we entered into a retirement agreement with Mr. Roskind which provided for his retirement
as an executive officer and employee on January 15, 2019. Messrs. Eglin and Carroll will continue in their current positions with us
subject to certain severance payout rights upon certain termination events.

Our inability to retain the services of any of our key personnel, an unplanned loss of any of their services or our inability to
replace them upon termination as needed, could adversely impact our operations. We do not have key man life insurance coverage
on our executive officers.

There may be conflicts of interest between E. Robert Roskind and us.

E. Robert Roskind, our Chairman, beneficially owns a significant number of OP units, and as a result, may face different and
more adverse tax consequences than our other shareholders will if we sell our interests in certain properties or reduce mortgage
indebtedness on certain properties. Our Chairman may, therefore, have different objectives than us and our debt and equity security
holders regarding the appropriate pricing and timing of any sale of such properties or reduction of mortgage debt. In addition, an
affiliate of Mr. Roskind arranges real estate asset financings using funds raised from immigrant investors in accordance with the fifth
preference employment-based immigration program administered by the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. During 2017,
we obtained a mezzanine loan from Mr. Roskind's affiliate and during 2018, one of our non-consolidated joint ventures obtained a
mezzanine loan from Mr. Roskind's affiliate. In the event of an appearance of a conflict of interest and in accordance with our policy
regarding related party transactions, Mr. Roskind is required to recuse himself from any decision making or seek a waiver of our
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, which will be reviewed by the non-conflicted members of our Board of Trustees or the Audit
Committee of the Board of Trustees.

Costs of complying with changes in governmental laws and regulations may adversely affect our results of operations.

We cannot predict what laws or regulations may be enacted, repealed or modified in the future, how future laws or regulations
will be administered or interpreted, or how future laws or regulations will affect our properties. Compliance with new or modified
laws or regulations, or stricter interpretation of existing laws, may require us or our tenants to incur significant expenditures, impose
significant liability, restrict or prohibit business activities and could cause a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

We disclose Funds From Operations available to common shareholders and unitholders (“FFO”), Adjusted Company Funds
from Operations available to all equityholders and unitholders (“Adjusted Company FFO”), Net Operating Income (“NOI”) and
other non-GAAP financial measures in documents filed and/or furnished with the SEC; however, neither FFO, Adjusted Company
FFO, NOI nor the other non-GAAP financial measures we disclose are equivalent to our net income or loss as determined under
GAAP or other applicable comparable GAAP measures, and you should consider GAAP measures to be more relevant to our
operating performance.

We use and disclose to investors FFO, Adjusted Company FFO, NOI and other non-GAAP financial measures. FFO, Adjusted
Company FFO, NOI and the other non-GAAP financial measures are not equivalent to our net income or loss as determined in
accordance with GAAP, and investors should consider GAAP measures to be more relevant to evaluating our operating performance.
FFO, Adjusted Company FFO and NOI, and GAAP net income (loss) differ because FFO, Adjusted Company FFO and NOI exclude
many items that are factored into GAAP net income or loss.

Because of the differences between FFO, Adjusted Company FFO, NOI and GAAP net income or loss, FFO, Adjusted Company
FFO and NOI may not be accurate indicators of our operating performance, especially during periods in which we are acquiring and
selling properties. In addition, FFO, Adjusted Company FFO and NOI are not necessarily indicative of cash flow available to fund
cash needs and investors should not consider FFO, Adjusted Company FFO or NOI as alternatives to cash flows from operations,
as an indication of our liquidity or as indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to make distributions
to our shareholders.

Neither the SEC nor any other regulatory body has passed judgment on the acceptability of the adjustments that we use to
calculate FFO, Adjusted Company FFO and NOI. Also, because not all companies calculate FFO, Adjusted Company FFO and NOI
the same way, comparisons with other companies measures with similar titles may not be meaningful.

Risks Related to Our Indebtedness

Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition and our ability to fulfill our obligations under the
documents governing our unsecured indebtedness and otherwise adversely impact our business and growth prospects.

We have a substantial amount of debt. We are more leveraged than certain of our competitors. We have incurred, and may
continue to incur, direct and indirect indebtedness in furtherance of our activities. Neither our declaration of trust nor any policy
statement formerly adopted by our Board of Trustees limits the total amount of indebtedness that we may incur, and accordingly, we
could become even more highly leveraged. As of December 31, 2018, our total consolidated indebtedness was approximately $1.5
billion and we had approximately $505.0 million available for borrowing under our principal credit agreement, subject to covenant
compliance.

Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and have important

consequences to us and our debt and equity security holders. For example, it could:

• make it more difficult for us to satisfy our indebtedness and debt service obligations and adversely affect our ability

to pay distributions;

increase our vulnerability to adverse economic and industry conditions;

require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to the payment of interest on and
principal of our indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of cash to fund working capital, capital expenditures
and other general corporate purposes;

limit our ability to borrow money or sell stock to fund our development projects, working capital, capital
expenditures, general corporate purposes or acquisitions;

restrict us from making strategic acquisitions or exploiting business opportunities;

place us at a disadvantage compared to competitors that have less debt; and

limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate.

•

In addition, the agreements that govern our current indebtedness contain, and the agreements that may govern any future
indebtedness that we may incur may contain, financial and other restrictive covenants, which may limit our ability to engage in
activities that may be in our long-term best interests. Our failure to comply with those covenants could result in an event of default
that, if not cured or waived, could result in the acceleration of our debt.

Market interest rates could have an adverse effect on our borrowing costs, profitability and the value of our fixed-rate debt
securities.

We have exposure to market risks relating to increases in interest rates due to our variable-rate debt. An increase in interest rates
may increase our costs of borrowing on existing variable-rate indebtedness, leading to a reduction in our earnings. As of December 31,
2018, we have a $300.0 million unsecured term loan which matures January 2021 that is LIBOR indexed. In addition, we have $129.1
million of debt that matures in April 2037 which is LIBOR indexed. The level of our variable-rate indebtedness, along with the
interest rate associated with such variable-rate indebtedness, may change in the future and materially affect our interest costs and
earnings. In addition, our interest costs on our fixed-rate indebtedness may increase if we are required to refinance our fixed-rate
indebtedness upon maturity at higher interest rates. Also, fixed rate debt securities generally decline in value as market rates rise
because the premium, if any, over market interest rates will decline.

The LIBOR index rate may not be available in the future.

In July 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority (the authority that regulates LIBOR) announced it intends to stop compelling
banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021. The Alternative Reference Rates Committee (“ARRC”) has proposed
that the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) is the rate that represents best practice as the alternative to USD-LIBOR for
use in derivatives and other financial contracts that are currently indexed to USD-LIBOR. ARRC has proposed a paced market
transition plan to SOFR from USD-LIBOR and organizations are currently working on industry wide and company specific transition
plans as it relates to derivatives and cash markets exposed to USD-LIBOR. We have material contracts that are indexed to USD-
LIBOR and we are monitoring this activity and evaluating the related risks.

Potential disruptions in the financial markets could affect our ability to obtain debt financing on reasonable terms and have other
adverse effects on us.

The United States credit markets have periodically experienced significant dislocations and liquidity disruptions which have
caused the spreads on prospective debt financings to widen considerably. These circumstances may materially impact liquidity in
the debt markets, making financing terms for borrowers less attractive, and in certain cases may result in the unavailability of certain
types of debt financing. Uncertainty in the credit markets may negatively impact our ability to access additional debt financing on
reasonable terms, which may negatively affect our ability to make acquisitions. A prolonged downturn in the credit markets may
cause us to seek alternative sources of potentially less attractive financing and may require us to adjust our business plan accordingly.
In addition, these factors may make it more difficult for us to sell properties or may adversely affect the price we receive for properties
that we do sell, as prospective buyers may experience increased costs of capital or difficulties in obtaining capital. These events in
the credit markets may have an adverse effect on other financial markets in the United States, which may make it more difficult or
costly for us to raise capital through the issuance of our common shares or preferred shares. These disruptions in the financial markets
may have other adverse effects on us, our tenants or the economy in general.

Covenants in certain of the agreements governing our debt could adversely affect our financial condition, investment activities
and/or operating activities.

Our unsecured revolving credit facility, unsecured term loan and indentures governing our 4.40% and 4.25% Senior Notes
contain certain cross-default and cross-acceleration provisions as well as customary restrictions, requirements and other limitations
on our ability to incur indebtedness and consummate mergers, consolidations or sales of all or substantially all of our assets. Our
ability to borrow under our unsecured revolving credit facility is also subject to compliance with certain other covenants. In addition,
failure to comply with our covenants could cause a default under the applicable debt instrument and we may then be required to
repay such debt with capital from other sources. Under those circumstances other sources of capital may not be available to us or be
available only on unattractive terms. Additionally, our ability to satisfy current or prospective lenders' insurance requirements may
be adversely affected if lenders generally insist upon greater insurance coverage than is available to us in the marketplace or on
commercially reasonable terms.

We rely on debt financing, including borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facility, unsecured term loan, debt
securities, and debt secured by individual properties, for working capital, including to finance our investment activities. If we are
unable to obtain financing from these or other sources, or to refinance existing indebtedness upon maturity, our financial condition
and results of operations could be adversely affected.

The documents governing our non-recourse indebtedness contain restrictions on the operations of our property owner subsidiaries
and their properties. Certain activities, like leasing, may be subject to the consent of the applicable lender. In addition, certain lenders
engage third-party loan servicers that may not be as responsive as we would be or as the leasing market requires.

A downgrade in our credit ratings could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

The credit ratings assigned to us and our debt could change based upon, among other things, our results of operations and
financial condition or the real estate industry generally. These ratings are subject to ongoing evaluation by credit rating agencies,
and we cannot assure you that any rating will not be changed or withdrawn by a rating agency in the future if, in the applicable rating
agency's judgment, circumstances warrant. Moreover, these credit ratings do not apply to our common and preferred shares and are
not recommendations to buy, sell or hold any other securities. Any downgrade of us or our debt could have a material adverse effect
on the market price of our debt securities and our common and preferred shares. If any credit rating agency that has rated us or our
debt downgrades or lowers its credit rating, or if any credit rating agency indicates that it has placed any such rating on a so-called
“watch list” for a possible downgrading or lowering or otherwise indicates that its outlook for that rating is negative, it could also
have a material adverse effect on our costs and availability of capital, which could in turn have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and our ability to satisfy our debt service obligations and to make dividends
and distributions on our common shares and preferred shares.

We face risks associated with refinancings.

A significant number of the properties in which we have an interest are subject to mortgage or other secured notes with balloon
payments due at maturity. In addition, our corporate level borrowings require interest only payments with all principal due at maturity.

As of December 31, 2018, the consolidated scheduled balloon payments for the next five calendar years are as follows ($ in

millions):

Year
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023

Property-Specific
Balloon Payments

Corporate Recourse
Balloon Payments

$
$
$
$
$

76.1
32.0
17.0

$
$
$
— $
— $

—
—
300.0
—
250.0

Our ability to make the scheduled balloon payments on any corporate recourse note will depend on our access to the capital
markets, including our ability to refinance the maturing note. Our ability to make the scheduled balloon payment on any non-recourse
mortgage note will depend upon (1) in the event we determine to contribute capital, our cash balances and the amount available
under our unsecured credit facility, and (2) the property owner subsidiary's ability either to refinance the related mortgage debt or
to sell the related property. If the property owner subsidiary is unable to refinance or sell the related property, the property may be
conveyed to the lender through foreclosure or other means or the property owner subsidiary may declare bankruptcy.

We face risks associated with returning properties to lenders.

A number of the properties in which we have an interest are subject to non-recourse mortgages, which generally provide that a
lender's only recourse upon an event of default is to foreclose on the property. In the event these properties are conveyed via foreclosure
to the lenders thereof, we would lose all of our interest in these properties. The loss of a significant number of properties to foreclosure
or through bankruptcy of a property owner subsidiary could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations,
relationships with lenders and ability to obtain additional financing in the future.

In addition, a lender may attempt to trigger a carve out to the non-recourse nature of a mortgage loan. To the extent a lender is
successful, the ability of our property owner subsidiary to return the property to the lender may be inhibited and/or we may be liable
for all or a portion of such loan.

Certain of our indebtedness is subject to cross-default and cross-acceleration provisions.

Substantially all of our corporate level borrowings and, in the future, certain of our secured indebtedness may, contain cross-
default and/or cross-acceleration provisions, which may be triggered if we default on certain indebtedness in excess of certain
thresholds. In the event of such a default, the resulting cross defaults and/or cross-accelerations may adversely impact our financial
condition.

Risks Related to Our Outstanding Debt Securities

The effective subordination of our unsecured indebtedness and any related guaranty may reduce amounts available for payment
on our unsecured indebtedness and any related guaranty.

The holders of our secured debt may foreclose on the assets securing such debt, reducing the cash flow from the foreclosed
property available for payment of unsecured debt and any related guaranty. The holders of any of our secured debt also would have
priority over unsecured creditors in the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation or similar proceeding.

None of our subsidiaries are guarantors of our unsecured debt; therefore assets of our subsidiaries may not be available to make
payments on our unsecured indebtedness.

As of December 31, 2018, we were the sole borrower of our unsecured indebtedness and none of our subsidiaries were guarantors
of our unsecured indebtedness. In the event of a bankruptcy, liquidation or reorganization of any of our subsidiaries, holders of
subsidiary debt, including trade creditors, will generally be entitled to payment of their claims from the assets of our subsidiaries
before any assets are made available for distribution to us.

All of our assets are held through our operating partnership and our other subsidiaries. Consequently, our cash flow and our
ability to meet our debt service obligations depends in large part upon the cash flow of our subsidiaries and the payment of funds by
our subsidiaries to us in the form of distributions or otherwise.

Risks Related to Lexington's REIT Status

There can be no assurance that Lexington will remain qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.

We believe that Lexington has met the requirements for qualification as a REIT for federal income tax purposes beginning with
its taxable year ended December 31, 1993, and we intend for Lexington to continue to meet these requirements in the future. However,
qualification as a REIT involves the application of highly technical and complex provisions of the Code, for which there are only
limited judicial or administrative interpretations. The Code provisions and income tax regulations applicable to REITs are more
complex than those applicable to corporations. The determination of various factual matters and circumstances not entirely within
our control may affect Lexington's ability to continue to qualify as a REIT. No assurance can be given that Lexington has qualified
or will remain qualified as a REIT. In addition, no assurance can be given that legislation, regulations, administrative interpretations
or court decisions will not significantly change the requirements for qualification as a REIT or the federal income tax consequences
of such qualification. If Lexington does not qualify as a REIT, Lexington would not be allowed a deduction for distributions to
shareholders in computing its net taxable income. In addition, Lexington's income would be subject to tax at the regular corporate
rates. Lexington also could be disqualified from treatment as a REIT for the four taxable years following the year during which
qualification was lost. Cash available to satisfy Lexington's debt service obligations and distributions to its shareholders would be
significantly reduced or suspended for each year in which Lexington does not qualify as a REIT. In that event, Lexington would not
be required to continue to make distributions. Although we currently intend for Lexington to continue to qualify as a REIT, it is
possible that future economic, market, legal, tax or other considerations may cause Lexington, without the consent of the shareholders,
to revoke the REIT election or to otherwise take action that would result in disqualification.

We may be subject to the REIT prohibited transactions tax, which could result in significant U.S. federal income tax liability to
us.

A REIT will incur a 100% tax on the net income from a prohibited transaction. Generally, a prohibited transaction includes a
sale or disposition of property held primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of a trade or business. While we believe
that the dispositions of our assets pursuant to our investment strategy should not be treated as prohibited transactions, whether a
particular sale will be treated as a prohibited transaction depends on the underlying facts and circumstances. We have not sought and
do not intend to seek a ruling from the Internal Revenue Service regarding any dispositions. Accordingly, there can be no assurance
that our dispositions of such assets will not be subject to the prohibited transactions tax. If all or a significant portion of those
dispositions were treated as prohibited transactions, we would incur a significant U.S. federal income tax liability, which could have
a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Distribution requirements imposed by law limit our flexibility.

To maintain Lexington's status as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, Lexington is generally required to distribute to its
shareholders at least 90% of its taxable income for that calendar year. Lexington's taxable income is determined without regard to
any deduction for dividends paid and by excluding net capital gains. To the extent that Lexington satisfies the distribution requirement
but distributes less than 100% of its taxable income, Lexington will be subject to federal corporate income tax on its undistributed
income. In addition, Lexington will incur a 4% nondeductible excise tax on the amount, if any, by which its distributions in any year
are less than the sum of (i) 85% of its ordinary income for that year, (ii) 95% of its capital gain net income for that year and (iii)
100% of its undistributed taxable income from prior years. We intend for Lexington to continue to make distributions to its shareholders
to comply with the distribution requirements of the Code and to reduce exposure to federal income and nondeductible excise taxes.
Differences in timing between the receipt of income and the payment of expenses in determining its taxable income and the effect
of required debt amortization payments could require Lexington to borrow funds on a short-term basis in order to meet the distribution
requirements that are necessary to achieve the tax benefits associated with qualifying as a REIT.

Legislative or regulatory tax changes could have an adverse effect on us.

At any time, the federal income tax laws governing REITs or the administrative interpretations of those laws may be amended.
Any of those new laws or interpretations may take effect retroactively and could adversely affect us or you as a debt and/or equity
security holder. REIT dividends generally are not eligible for the reduced rates currently applicable to certain corporate dividends
(unless attributable to dividends from taxable REIT subsidiaries and otherwise eligible for such rates). As a result, investment in
non-REIT corporations may be relatively more attractive than investment in REITs. This could adversely affect the market price of
our shares.

Tax legislation signed into law on December 22, 2017, makes numerous changes to the tax rules that do not affect the REIT
qualification rules directly, but may otherwise affect us or our shareholders. For example, the top federal income tax rate for individuals
was reduced to 37%, there is a new deduction available for certain Qualified Business Income that reduces the top effective tax rate
applicable to ordinary dividends from REITs to 29.6% (through a 20% deduction for ordinary REIT dividends received) and various
deductions are eliminated or limited. Most of the changes applicable to individuals are temporary. There are only minor changes to
the REIT rules (other than the 20% deduction applicable to individuals for ordinary REIT dividends received). To date, the Internal
Revenue Service has issued only limited guidance on the changes made by the new legislation. It is unclear at this time whether
Congress will address these issues or when the Internal Revenue Service will issue additional administrative guidance on the changes
made by the 2017 legislation.

Risks Related to Our Shares

We may change the dividend policy for our common shares in the future.

The decision to declare and pay dividends on our common shares in the future, as well as the timing, amount and composition
of any such future dividends, will be at the sole discretion of our Board of Trustees in light of conditions then existing, including
our earnings, financial condition, capital requirements, debt maturities, the availability of debt and equity capital, applicable REIT
and legal restrictions and the general overall economic conditions and other factors. The actual dividend payable will be determined
by our Board of Trustees based upon the circumstances at the time of declaration and the actual dividend payable may vary from
such expected amount. In 2018, we announced that we expect a change in our dividend policy for our common shares to reduce the
quarterly dividend amount as a result of our strategy of investing primarily in industrial assets. Any change in our dividend policy
could have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common shares.

We may in the future choose to pay dividends in shares, in which case you may be required to pay income taxes in excess of the
cash dividends you receive.

We may in the future distribute taxable dividends that are payable in shares. Taxable shareholders receiving such dividends will
be required to include the full amount of the dividend as ordinary income to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and
profits for United States federal income tax purposes. As a result, a U.S. shareholder may be required to pay income taxes with
respect to such dividends even though no cash dividends were received. If a U.S. shareholder sells the shares it receives as a dividend
in order to pay this tax, the sales proceeds may be less than the amount included in income with respect to the dividend, depending
on the market price of the shares at the time of the sale. Furthermore, with respect to non-U.S. shareholders, we may be required to
withhold U.S. tax with respect to such dividends. In addition, if a significant number of our shareholders determine to sell such shares
received in a dividend in order to pay taxes owed on such dividend, it may put downward pressure on the trading price of our common
shares.

Securities eligible for future sale may have adverse effects on our share price.

We have an unallocated universal shelf registration statement and we also maintain a direct share purchase plan, pursuant to
which we may issue additional common shares. There is no restriction on our issuing additional common or preferred shares, including
any securities that are convertible into or exchangeable for, or that represent the right to receive, common or preferred shares or any
substantially similar securities. As of December 31, 2018, an aggregate of approximately 3.7 million of our common shares were
issuable upon the exercise of employee share options and upon the exchange of OP units. Depending upon the number of such
securities issued, exercised or exchanged at one time, an issuance, exercise or exchange of such securities could be dilutive to or
otherwise adversely affect the interests of holders or the market price of our common shares.

There are certain limitations on a third party's ability to acquire us or effectuate a change in our control.

Limitations imposed to protect our REIT status. In order to protect against the loss of our REIT status, among other purposes,
our declaration of trust limits any shareholder from owning more than 9.8% in value of our outstanding equity shares, defined as
common shares or preferred shares, subject to certain exceptions. These ownership limits may have the effect of precluding acquisition
of control of us. Our Board of Trustees has granted a limited waiver of the ownership limits to BlackRock, Inc. with respect to
BlackRock, Inc.'s mutual funds.

Severance payments under our executive severance policy. Substantial termination payments may be required to be paid under
our executive severance policy applicable to and related agreements with our executives upon the termination of an executive. If
those executive officers are terminated without cause, as defined, or resign for good reason, as defined, those executive officers may
be entitled to severance benefits based on their current annual base salaries and trailing average of recent annual cash bonuses as
defined in our executive severance policy and related agreements and the acceleration of certain non-vested equity awards.
Accordingly, these payments may discourage a third party from acquiring us.

Our ability to issue additional shares. Our declaration of trust authorizes 1,000,000,000 shares of beneficial interest (par value
$0.0001 per share) consisting of 400,000,000 common shares, 100,000,000 preferred shares and 500,000,000 shares of beneficial
interest classified as excess stock, or excess shares. Our Board of Trustees is authorized to cause us to issue these shares without
shareholder approval. Our Board of Trustees may establish the preferences and rights of any such class or series of additional shares,
which could have the effect of delaying or preventing someone from taking control of us, even if a change in control were in
shareholders' best interests. At December 31, 2018, in addition to common shares, we had outstanding 1,935,400 Series C Preferred
Shares. Our Series C Preferred Shares include provisions, such as increases in dividend rates or adjustments to conversion rates, that
may deter a change of control. The establishment and issuance of shares of our existing series of preferred shares or a future class
or series of shares could make a change of control of us more difficult.

Maryland Business Combination Act. The Maryland General Corporation Law, as applicable to Maryland REITs, establishes
special restrictions against “business combinations” between a Maryland REIT and “interested shareholders” or their affiliates unless
an exemption is applicable. An interested shareholder includes a person who beneficially owns, and an affiliate or associate of the
trust who, at any time within the two-year period prior to the date in question was the beneficial owner of, 10% or more of the voting
power of our then-outstanding voting shares, but a person is not an interested shareholder if the Board of Trustees approved in advance
the transaction by which such person otherwise would have become an interested shareholder, which approval may be conditioned
by the Board of Trustees. Among other things, Maryland law prohibits (for a period of five years) a merger and certain other transactions
between a Maryland REIT and an interested shareholder, or an affiliate of an interested shareholder. The five-year period runs from
the most recent date on which the interested shareholder became an interested shareholder. Thereafter, any such business combination
must be recommended by the Board of Trustees and approved by two super-majority shareholder votes unless, among other conditions,
the common shareholders receive a minimum price (as defined in the Maryland General Corporation Law) for their shares and the
consideration is received in cash or in the same form as previously paid by the interested shareholder for its shares. The statute
permits various exemptions from its provisions, including business combinations that are exempted by the Board of Trustees prior
to the time that the interested shareholder becomes an interested shareholder. The business combination statute could have the effect
of discouraging offers to acquire us and of increasing the difficulty of consummating any such offers, even if such acquisition would
be in shareholders' best interests. In connection with the Newkirk Merger, Vornado Realty Trust, which we refer to as Vornado, was
granted a limited exemption from the definition of “interested shareholder.”

Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act. Maryland law provides that a holder of “control shares” of a Maryland REIT acquired
in a “control share acquisition” has no voting rights with respect to such shares except to the extent approved by a vote of two-thirds
of the votes entitled to be cast on the matter under the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act. Shares owned by the acquirer, by
our officers or by employees who are our trustees are excluded from shares entitled to vote on the matter. “Control Shares” are voting
shares that, if aggregated with all other shares previously acquired by the acquirer or in respect of which the acquirer is able to
exercise or direct the exercise of voting power (except solely by virtue of a revocable proxy), would entitle the acquirer to exercise
voting power in electing trustees within one of the following ranges of voting power: one-tenth or more but less than one-third, one-
third or more but less than a majority or a majority or more of all voting power. Control shares do not include shares the acquiring
person is then entitled to vote as a result of having previously obtained shareholder approval. A “control share acquisition” means
the acquisition of issued and outstanding control shares, subject to certain exceptions. If voting rights of control shares acquired in
a control share acquisition are not approved at a shareholders meeting or if the acquiring person does not deliver an acquiring person
statement as required under the statute, then, subject to certain conditions and limitations, the issuer may redeem any or all of the
control shares for fair value, except those for which voting rights have been previously approved. If voting rights of such control
shares are approved at a shareholders meeting and the acquirer becomes entitled to vote a majority of the shares entitled to vote, all
other shareholders may exercise appraisal rights. Any control shares acquired in a control share acquisition which are not exempt
under our by-laws will be subject to the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act. The Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act does
not apply to shares acquired in a merger, consolidation or statutory share exchange if the Maryland REIT is a party to the transaction,
or to acquisitions approved or exempted by the declaration of trust or by-laws of the Maryland REIT. Our by-laws contain a provision
exempting from the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act any and all acquisitions by any person of our shares. We cannot assure
you that this provision will not be amended or eliminated at any time in the future.

Limits on ownership of our capital shares may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing someone from taking control
of us.

For us to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, among other requirements, not more than 50% of the value of our
outstanding capital shares may be owned, directly or indirectly, by five or fewer individuals (as defined for federal income tax
purposes to include certain entities) during the last half of each taxable year, and these capital shares must be beneficially owned by
100 or more persons during at least 335 days of a taxable year of 12 months or during a proportionate part of a shorter taxable year
(in each case, other than the first such year for which a REIT election is made). Our declaration of trust includes certain restrictions
regarding transfers of our capital shares and ownership limits.

Actual or constructive ownership of our capital shares in violation of the restrictions or in excess of the share ownership limits
contained in our declaration of trust would cause the violative transfer or ownership to be void or cause the shares to be transferred
to a charitable trust and then sold to a person or entity who can own the shares without violating these limits. As a result, if a violative
transfer were made, the recipient of the shares would not acquire any economic or voting rights attributable to the transferred shares.
Additionally, the constructive ownership rules for these limits are complex, and groups of related individuals or entities may be
deemed a single owner and consequently in violation of the share ownership limits.

However, these restrictions and limits may not be adequate in all cases to prevent the transfer of our capital shares in violation
of the ownership limitations. The ownership limits discussed above may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing someone
from taking control of us, even though a change of control could involve a premium price for the common shares or otherwise be in
shareholders' best interests.

The trading price of our common shares has been, and may continue to be, subject to significant fluctuations.

The market price of our common shares may fluctuate in response to company-specific and general market events and
developments, including those described in this Annual Report. In addition, our leverage may impact investor demand for our common
shares, which could have a material effect on the market price of our common shares.

Furthermore, the public valuation of our common shares is related primarily to the earnings that we derive from rental income
with respect to the properties in which we have an interest and not from the underlying appraised value of the properties themselves.
As a result, interest rate fluctuations and capital market conditions can affect the market value of our common shares. For instance,
if interest rates rise, the market price of our common shares may decrease because potential investors seeking a higher yield than
they would receive from our common shares may sell our common shares in favor of higher yielding securities.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

There are no unresolved written comments that were received from the SEC staff relating to our periodic or current reports

under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Item 2. Properties

Real Estate Portfolio

General. As of December 31, 2018, we had equity ownership interests in approximately 135 consolidated real estate properties
containing approximately 47.6 million square feet of rentable space, which were approximately 95.1% leased based upon net rentable
square feet. Generally, all properties in which we have an interest are held through at least one property owner subsidiary.

Ground Leases. Certain of the properties in which we have an interest are subject to long-term ground leases where either the
tenant of the building on the property or a third party owns and leases the underlying land to the property owner subsidiary. Certain
of these properties are economically owned through the holding of industrial revenue bonds primarily for real estate tax abatement
purposes and as such, neither ground lease payments nor bond interest payments are made or received, respectively. For certain of
the properties held under a ground lease, the ground lessee has a purchase option. At the end of these long-term ground leases, unless
extended or the purchase option is exercised, the land together with all improvements thereon reverts to the landowner.

Leverage. As of December 31, 2018, we had outstanding mortgages and notes payable of approximately $575.5 million with a

weighted-average interest rate of approximately 4.5% and a weighted-average maturity of 9.5 years.

Property Charts. The following tables list our properties by type, their locations, the primary tenant/guarantor, the net rentable

square feet, the expiration of the primary lease term and percent leased, as applicable, as of December 31, 2018.

LEXINGTON CONSOLIDATED PORTFOLIO
PROPERTY CHART
INDUSTRIAL

As of December 31, 2018

Property Location

City

State

Primary Tenant (Guarantor)

Single-tenant properties:

Net
Rentable
Square
Feet

Current
Lease Term
Expiration

Percent
Leased

318 Pappy Dunn Blvd.

Anniston

International Automotive Components Group North
America, Inc.

276,782

11/24/2029

100%

2415 U.S. Hwy 78 East

Moody

Michelin North America, Inc.

595,346

12/31/2019

100%

4801 North Park Dr.

Opelika

Golden State Foods Corp. (Golden State Enterprises, Inc.)

165,493

5/31/2042

100%

16811 W. Commerce Dr.

Goodyear

Blue Buffalo Company, LTD (Blue Buffalo Pet Products,
Inc.)

540,349

4/30/2026

100%

2455 Premier Row

Orlando

Walgreen Co. / Walgreen Eastern Co.

205,016

3/31/2021

100%

3102 Queen Palm Dr.

Tampa

Time Mailing Services, LLC (Time Inc.)

229,605

6/30/2020

100%

359 Gateway Dr.

Lavonia

TI Group Automotive Systems, LLC (TI Automotive
Ltd.)

133,221

5/31/2020

100%

490 Westridge Pkwy.

McDonough

Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products LP (Georgia-Pacific
LLC)

1,121,120

1/31/2028

100%

1420 Greenwood Rd.

McDonough

United States Cold Storage, Inc.

296,972

8/31/2028

100%

3301 Stagecoach Rd. NE

Thomson

Hollander Sleep Products, LLC (Hollander Home
Fashions Holdings)

208,000

5/31/2030

100%

3931 Lakeview Corporate Dr. Edwardsville

4015 Lakeview Corporate Dr. Edwardsville

1001 Innovation Rd.

Rantoul

3686 S. Central Ave.

Rockford

749 Southrock Dr.

Rockford

AMAZON.COM.DEDC, LLC (Amazon.com, Inc.)

769,500

9/30/2026

100%

Spectrum Brands Pet Group, Inc.

1,017,780

5/31/2030

100%

Bell Sports, Inc. (Vista Outdoor Inc.)

813,126

10/31/2034

100%

Pierce Packaging Co.

93,000

12/31/2021

100%

Jacobson Warehouse Company, Inc. (Jacobson
Distribution Company and Jacobson Transportation
Company, Inc.)

150,000

MTM

100%

1020 W. Airport Rd.

Romeoville

ARYZTA LLC (ARYZTA AG)

188,166

10/31/2031

100%

1621 Veterans Memorial
Pkwy E

Lafayette

Caterpillar, Inc.

309,400

9/30/2024

100%

1285 W. State Road 32

Lebanon

Continental Tire the Americas, LLC

741,880

1/31/2024

100%

27200 West 157th St.

New Century

Amazon.com.ksdc, LLC (Amazon.com, Inc.)

446,500

1/31/2027

100%

10000 Business Blvd.

Dry Ridge

Dana Light Axle Products, LLC (Dana Holding
Corporation and Dana Limited)

336,350

6/30/2025

100%

730 North Black Branch Rd.

Elizabethtown

KY Metalsa Structural Products, Inc. / Dana Structural

167,770

6/30/2025

100%

Products, LLC (Dana Holding Corporation and Dana
Limited)

750 North Black Branch Rd.

Elizabethtown

KY Metalsa Structural Products, Inc. / Dana Structural

539,592

6/30/2025

100%

Products, LLC (Dana Holding Corporation and Dana
Limited)

301 Bill Bryan Blvd.

Hopkinsville

KY Metalsa Structural Products, Inc. / Dana Structural

424,904

6/30/2025

100%

Products, LLC (Dana Holding Corporation and Dana
Limited)

LEXINGTON CONSOLIDATED PORTFOLIO
PROPERTY CHART
INDUSTRIAL

As of December 31, 2018

Property Location

City

State

Primary Tenant (Guarantor)

Net
Rentable
Square
Feet

Current
Lease Term
Expiration

Percent
Leased

4010 Airpark Dr.

Owensboro

KY Metalsa Structural Products, Inc. / Dana Structural

211,598

6/30/2025

100%

Products, LLC (Dana Holding Corporation and Dana
Limited)

1901 Ragu Dr.

Owensboro

Unilever Supply Chain, Inc. (Unilever United States, Inc.)

443,380

12/19/2020

100%

5001 Greenwood Rd.

Shreveport

Libbey Glass Inc. (Libbey Inc.)

646,000

10/31/2026

100%

5417 Campus Dr.

Shreveport

The Tire Rack, Inc.

257,849

3/31/2022

100%

113 Wells St.

North Berwick ME

United Technologies Corporation

993,685

4/30/2024

100%

2860 Clark St.

Detroit

6938 Elm Valley Dr.

Kalamazoo

904 Industrial Rd.

Marshall

43955 Plymouth Oaks Blvd.

Plymouth

Undisclosed(1)

189,960

10/22/2035

100%

Dana Commercial Vehicle Products, LLC (Dana Holding
Corporation and Dana Limited)

150,945

10/25/2021

100%

Tenneco Automotive Operating Company, Inc. (Tenneco,
Inc.)

246,508

9/30/2028

100%

Tower Automotive Operations USA I, LLC / Tower
Automotive Products Inc. (Tower Automotive, Inc.)

311,612

10/31/2024

100%

16950 Pine Dr.

Romulus

Undisclosed(1)

500,023

8/24/2032

100%

26700 Bunert Rd.

Warren

Lipari Foods Operating Company, LLC

260,243

10/31/2032

100%

1700 47th Ave North

Minneapolis

Owens Corning Roofing and Asphalt, LLC

18,620

12/31/2025

100%

549 Wingo Rd.

Byhalia

Asics America Corporation (Asics Corporation)

855,878

3/31/2030

100%

1550 Hwy 302

Byhalia

MS McCormick & Company, Inc.

615,600

9/30/2027

100%

554 Nissan Pkwy.

Canton

Nissan North America, Inc.

1,466,000

2/28/2027

100%

11624 S. Distribution Cv.

Olive Branch

Hamilton Beach Brands, Inc.

1,170,218

6/30/2021

100%

7670 Hacks Cross Rd.

Olive Branch

MS MAHLE Aftermarket Inc. (MAHLE Industries,

268,104

2/28/2023

100%

Incorporated)

8500 Nail Rd.

Olive Branch

Sephora USA, Inc.

716,080

7/31/2029

100%

2880 Kenny Biggs Rd.

Lumberton

Quickie Manufacturing Corporation

423,280

11/30/2021

100%

671 Washburn Switch Rd.

Shelby

Clearwater Paper Corporation

673,425

5/31/2036

100%

2203 Sherrill Dr.

Statesville

Geodis Logistics, LLC (OHH Acquisition Corporation)

639,800

12/31/2020

100%

121 Technology Dr.

Durham

Heidelberg Americas, Inc. (Heidelberg Druckmaschinen
AG) (2021) / Goss International Americas, Inc. (Goss
International Corporation) (2026)

500,500

3/30/2026

100%

LEXINGTON CONSOLIDATED PORTFOLIO
PROPERTY CHART
INDUSTRIAL

As of December 31, 2018

Property Location

City

State

Primary Tenant (Guarantor)

5625 North Sloan Ln.

North Las Vegas NV

Nicholas and Co., Inc.

Net
Rentable
Square
Feet

Current
Lease Term
Expiration

Percent
Leased

180,235

9/30/2034

100%

736 Addison Rd.

Erwin

Corning Property Management Corporation

408,000

11/30/2026

100%

29-01 Borden Ave. / 29-10
Hunters Point Ave.

Long Island
City

FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (FedEx Corporation)

140,330

3/31/2028

100%

351 Chamber Dr.

Chillicothe

The Kitchen Collection, Inc.

475,218

6/30/2026

100%

10590 Hamilton Ave.

Cincinnati

The Hillman Group, Inc.

264,598

12/31/2027

100%

1650 - 1654 Williams Rd.

Columbus

ODW Logistics, Inc. (Nessent Ltd. And Dist-Trans Co,
LLC)

772,450

6/30/2020

100%

7005 Cochran Rd.

Glenwillow

Royal Appliance Mfg. Co.

458,000

7/31/2025

100%

191 Arrowhead Dr.

Hebron

Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC

250,410

12/31/2019

100%

200 Arrowhead Dr.

Hebron

Owens Corning Insulating Systems, LLC

400,522

12/31/2019

100%

10345 Philipp Pkwy.

Streetsboro

L'Oreal USA S/D, Inc. (L'Oreal USA, Inc.)

649,250

10/17/2019

100%

27255 SW 95th Ave.

Wilsonville

Pacific Foods of Oregon Inc. d/b/a Pacific Natural Foods

508,277

10/31/2032

100%

250 Rittenhouse Cir.

Bristol

Northtec LLC (The Estée Lauder Companies Inc.)

241,977

11/30/2026

100%

100 Ryobi Dr.

Anderson

One World Technologies, Inc. (Techtronic Industries Co.
Ltd.)

1,327,022

6/30/2036

100%

590 Ecology Ln.

Chester

Boral Stone Products LLC (Boral Limited)

420,597

7/14/2025

100%

101 Michelin Dr.

Laurens

Michelin North America, Inc.

1,164,000

1/31/2020

100%

5795 North Blackstock Rd.

Spartanburg

Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. (Wal-Mart, Inc.)

341,660

7/31/2024

100%

1520 Lauderdale Memorial
Hwy.

Cleveland

General Electric Company

851,370

3/31/2024

100%

900 Industrial Blvd.

Crossville

Dana Commercial Vehicle Products, LLC

222,200

9/30/2026

100%

120 Southeast Pkwy Dr.

Franklin

Essex Group, Inc. (United Technologies Corporation)

289,330

12/31/2023

100%

201 James Lawrence Rd.

Jackson

Kellogg Sales Company (Kellogg Company)

1,062,055

10/31/2027

100%

633 Garrett Pkwy.

Lewisburg

Calsonic Kansei North America, Inc.

310,000

3/31/2026

100%

3350 Miac Cove Rd.

Memphis

Mimeo.com, Inc.

140,079

9/30/2020

77%

3820 Micro Dr.

Millington

Ingram Micro L.P. (Ingram Micro Inc.)

701,819

9/30/2021

100%

200 Sam Griffin Rd.

Smyrna

Nissan North America, Inc.

1,505,000

4/30/2027

100%

1501 Nolan Ryan Expy.

Arlington

Arrow Electronics, Inc.

74,739

6/30/2027

100%

7007 F.M. 362 Rd.

Brookshire

Orizon Industries, Inc. (Spitzer Industries, Inc.)

262,095

3/31/2035

100%

LEXINGTON CONSOLIDATED PORTFOLIO
PROPERTY CHART
INDUSTRIAL

As of December 31, 2018

Property Location

City

State

Primary Tenant (Guarantor)

2115 East Belt Line Rd.

Carrollton

Teasdale Foods, Inc.

Net
Rentable
Square
Feet

Current
Lease Term
Expiration

Percent
Leased

356,855

12/31/2033

100%

4005 E I-30

Grand Prairie

O'Neal Metals (Texas) L.P. (O'Neal Industries, Inc.)

215,000

3/31/2037

100%

13863 Industrial Rd.

Houston

Curtis Kelly, Inc. (Spitzer Industries, Inc.)

187,800

3/31/2035

100%

13901/14035 Industrial Rd.

Houston

TX Watco Dock & Rail III, L.L.C. (Watco Companies,

132,449

3/31/2038

100%

L.L.C.)

13930 Pike Rd.

Missouri City

Vulcan Construction Materials, LP (Vulcan Materials
Company)

N/A

4/30/2032

100%

10535 Red Bluff Rd.

Pasadena

Unis, LLC

257,835

8/31/2023

100%

16407 Applewhite Rd.

San Antonio

International Heating, Air-Conditioning and Refrigeration
Solutions Company

849,275

4/30/2027

100%

2601 Bermuda Hundred Rd.

Chester

Philip Morris USA Inc.

1,034,470

6/30/2030

100%

80 Tyson Dr.

Winchester

Undisclosed(1)

400,400

12/18/2031

100%

291 Park Center Dr.

Winchester

Kraft Heinz Foods Company

344,700

5/31/2021

100%

901 East Bingen Point Way

Bingen

The Boeing Company

124,539

5/31/2024

100%

2800 Polar Way

Richland

Preferred Freezer Services of Richland, LLC (Preferred
Freezer Services, LLC & Preferred Freezer Services
Operating, LLC)

456,412

8/31/2035

100%

111 West Oakview Pkwy.

Oak Creek

Stella & Chewy's LLC

164,007

6/30/2035

100%

Multi-tenant/vacant properties:

2935 Van Vactor Dr.

Plymouth

(Available for lease)

1133 Poplar Creek Rd.

Henderson

(Available for lease)

50 Tyger River Dr.

Duncan

(Available for lease)

6050 Dana Way

Antioch

Multi-tenanted

3456 Meyers Ave.

Memphis

(Available for lease)

300,500

196,946

221,833

N/A

674,528

Various

780,000

N/A

97%

(1)

Tenant is a domestic subsidiary of an international automaker.

Industrial Total

41,447,962

96.3%

The 2018 net effective annual base cash rent for the industrial portfolio as of December 31, 2018 was $4.41 per square foot and the
weighted-average remaining lease term was 9.6 years.

LEXINGTON CONSOLIDATED PORTFOLIO
PROPERTY CHART
OFFICE

As of December 31, 2018

Property Location

City

State

Primary Tenant (Guarantor)

Single-tenant properties:

Net
Rentable
Square
Feet

Current
Lease Term
Expiration

Percent
Leased

19019 North 59th Ave.

Glendale

Honeywell International Inc.

252,300

7/15/2024

100%

8555 South River Pkwy.

Tempe

Versum Materials US, LLC

95,133

12/31/2033

100%

1440 East 15th St.

Tucson

CoxCom, LLC

28,591

7/31/2022

100%

3333 Coyote Hill Rd.

Palo Alto

Xerox Corporation

202,000

12/14/2023

100%

5600 Broken Sound Blvd.

Boca Raton

Canon Solutions America, Inc. (Océ -USA Holding, Inc.)

143,290

2/14/2020

100%

9200 South Park Center Loop Orlando

CardWorks Servicing, LLC (CardWorks, Inc.)

59,927

9/30/2029

100%

3500 N. Loop Rd.

McDonough

Total Systems Services, Inc.

62,218

8/31/2021

100%

3265 E. Goldstone Dr.

Meridian

500 Jackson St.

Columbus

10475 Crosspoint Blvd.

Indianapolis

VoiceStream PCS Holding, LLC / T-Mobile PCS
Holdings, LLC (T-Mobile USA, Inc.)

77,484

6/30/2026

100%

Cummins Inc.

390,100

7/31/2024

100%

John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

141,047

10/31/2019

100%

9601 Renner Blvd.

Lenexa

VoiceStream PCS II Corporation (T-Mobile USA, Inc.)

77,484

10/31/2019

100%

11201 Renner Blvd.

Lenexa

United States of America

169,585

10/31/2027

100%

4455 American Way

Baton Rouge

New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC

70,100

10/31/2022

100%

133 First Park Dr.

Oakland

Omnipoint Holdings, Inc. (T-Mobile USA, Inc.)

78,610

8/31/2020

100%

2800 High Meadow Cir.

Auburn Hills

Faurecia USA Holdings, Inc.

278,000

3/31/2029

100%

9201 Stateline Rd.

Kansas City

Swiss Re America Holding Corporation / Westport
Insurance Corporation / Swiss RE Management (US)
Corporation

155,925

4/1/2019

100%

3943 Denny Ave.

Pascagoula

Huntington Ingalls Incorporated

94,841

10/31/2023

100%

1415 Wyckoff Rd.

Wall

29 S. Jefferson Rd.

Whippany

2999 Southwest 6th St.

Redmond

New Jersey Natural Gas Company

157,511

6/30/2021

100%

CAE SimuFlite, Inc. (CAE INC.)

123,734

11/30/2021

100%

VoiceStream PCS I, LLC / T-Mobile West Corporation (T-
Mobile USA, Inc.)

77,260

7/31/2029

100%

1701 Market St.

Philadelphia

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP

304,037

1/31/2021

99%

1362 Celebration Blvd.

Florence

MED3000, Inc.

32,000

2/14/2024

100%

3476 Stateview Blvd.

Fort Mill

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

169,083

5/31/2024

100%

3480 Stateview Blvd.

Fort Mill

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

169,218

5/31/2024

100%

2401 Cherahala Blvd.

Knoxville

AdvancePCS, Inc. / CaremarkPCS, L.L.C.

59,748

5/31/2027

100%

LEXINGTON CONSOLIDATED PORTFOLIO
PROPERTY CHART
OFFICE

As of December 31, 2018

Property Location

City

State

Primary Tenant (Guarantor)

Net
Rentable
Square
Feet

Current
Lease Term
Expiration

Percent
Leased

1401 Nolan Ryan Expy.

Arlington

Triumph Aerostructures, LLC (Triumph Group, Inc.)

161,808

1/31/2025

80%

820 Gears Rd.

Houston

Ricoh, USA, Inc.

78,895

1/31/2019

100%

270 Abner Jackson Pkwy.

Lake Jackson

The Dow Chemical Company

664,100

10/31/2036

100%

3711 San Gabriel

Mission

VoiceStream PCS II Corporation / T-Mobile West
Corporation

75,016

6/30/2020

100%

2050 Roanoke Rd.

Westlake

Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

130,199

6/30/2021

100%

13651 McLearen Rd.

Herndon

United States of America

159,644

5/30/2022

100%

2800 Waterford Lake Dr.

Midlothian

Alstom Power, Inc.

99,057

12/31/2019

100%

Multi-tenant/vacant properties:

13430 North Black Canyon
Fwy

Phoenix

Multi-tenanted

138,940

Various

85%

5200 Metcalf Ave.

Overland Park

(Available for lease)

320,198

N/A

1460 Tobias Gadson Blvd.

Charleston

Vallen Distribution, Inc.

50,246

6/30/2019

11511 Luna Rd.

Farmers Branch TX

International Business Machines Corporation

181,072

4/30/2021

1311 Broadfield Blvd.

Houston

Saipem America, Inc. (Saipem S.p.A.)

155,407

3/31/2028

64%

92%

49%

Office Total

5,683,808

91.4%

The 2018 net effective annual base cash rent for the office portfolio as of December 31, 2018 was $15.18 per square foot and the
weighted-average remaining lease term was 6.5 years.

LEXINGTON CONSOLIDATED PORTFOLIO
PROPERTY CHART
OTHER

As of December 31, 2018

Property Location

City

State

Primary Tenant (Guarantor)

Property Type

Single-tenant properties:

Net
Rentable
Square
Feet

Current
Lease
Term
Expiration

Percent
Leased

499 Derbyshire Dr.

Venice

Littlestone Brotherhood LLC (Ralph
Little)

Specialty

31,180

1/31/2055

100%

30 Light St.

Baltimore

MD 30 Charm City, LLC

201-215 N. Charles St.

Baltimore

MD 201 NC Leasehold LLC

10201 Schuster Way

Pataskala

B.E.C. 45th St/Lee Blvd.

Lawton

Kohl's Department Stores, Inc. (Kohl's
Corporation)

Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc. /
Safeway, Inc.

1053 Mineral Springs Rd.

Paris

The Kroger Co.

Specialty

Retail

N/A 12/31/2048

100%

N/A 8/31/2112

100%

N/A 12/31/2067

100%

30,757

3/31/2024

100%

31,170

7/1/2023

100%

175 Holt Garrison Pkwy.

Danville

Home Depot USA, Inc.

Specialty

N/A 1/31/2029

100%

Multi-tenant/vacant properties:

832 N. Westover Blvd.

Albany

(Available for lease)

Retail

45,554

N/A

King St./1042 Fort St. Mall Honolulu

Multi-tenanted

Retail/Office

77,459

Various

46%

21082 Pioneer Plaza Dr.

Watertown

(Available for lease)

97 Seneca Trail

Fairlea

WV (Available for lease)

Other Total

Consolidated Portfolio Grand Total

Retail

120,727

90,933

427,780

47,559,550

N/A

30.0%

95.1%

The 2018 net effective annual base cash rent for the other portfolio as of December 31, 2018 was $2.49 per square foot, excluding
Specialty investments, and the weighted-average remaining lease term was 30.5 years.

The 2018 net effective annual base cash rent for the consolidated portfolio as of December 31, 2018 was $5.68 per square foot,
excluding Specialty investments, and the weighted-average remaining lease term was 8.9 years.

LEXINGTON
NON-CONSOLIDATED PORTFOLIO PROPERTY
CHART

As of December 31, 2018

Property Location

City

State

Primary Tenant (Guarantor)

Net
Rentable
Square
Feet

Current
Lease
Term
Expiration

Percent
Leased

Property
Type

9201 E. Dry Creek Rd.

Centennial

9655 Maroon Cir.

Englewood

1315 West Century Dr.

Louisville

143 Diamond Ave.

Parachute

Arrow Electronics, Inc.

Office

128,500

3/31/2033

100%

TriZetto Corporation (Cognizant Technology
Solutions Corporation)

Global Healthcare Exchange, Inc. (GHX Ultimate
Partner Corporation)

Encana Oil and Gas (USA) Inc./Caerus Piceanco
LLC (Alenco Inc.)

Office

166,912

4/30/2028

100%

Office

106,877

4/30/2027

100%

Office

49,024 10/31/2032

100%

2500 Patrick Henry Pkwy.

McDonough

Georgia Power Company

Office

111,911

6/30/2025

100%

231 N. Martingale Rd.

Schaumburg

3902 Gene Field Rd.

St. Joseph

CEC Educational Services, LLC (Career
Education Corporation)

Boehringer Ingelheim Vetmedica, Inc.
(Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation)

Office

317,198 12/31/2022

100%

Office

98,849

6/30/2027

100%

1210 AvidXchange Ln.

Charlotte

AvidXchange, Inc.

Office

201,450

4/30/2032

100%

333 Mount Hope Ave.

Rockaway

Atlantic Health System, Inc.

Office

92,326 12/31/2031

100%

6226 West Sahara Ave.

Las Vegas

Nevada Power Company

Office

282,000

1/31/2029

100%

2221 Schrock Rd.

Columbus

MS Consultants, Inc.

Office

42,290

7/6/2027

100%

500 Olde Worthington Rd.

Westerville

InVentiv Health, Inc. (Syneos Health, Inc.)

Office

97,000

3/31/2026

100%

25 Lakeview Dr.

Jessup

601 & 701 Experian Pkwy.

Allen

4001 International Pkwy.

Carrollton

10001 Richmond Ave.

Houston

810 Gears Rd.

Houston

18839 McKay Blvd.

Humble

6555 Sierra Dr.

Irving

8900 Freeport Pkwy.

Irving

2203 North Westgreen Blvd. Katy

800 East Canal St.

Richmond

TMG Health, Inc. (Cognizant Technology
Solutions Corporation)

Office

150,000

8/7/2027

100%

Experian Information Solutions, Inc. / TRW, Inc.
(Experian Holdings, Inc.)

Office

292,700

3/14/2025

100%

Motel 6 Operating, LP

Office

138,443 12/31/2025

100%

Schlumberger Holdings Corp.

Office

554,385

9/30/2025

100%

United States of America

Office

78,895

1/10/2031

87%

Triumph Rehabilitation Hospital of Northeast
Houston, LLC (RehabCare Group, Inc.)

TXU Energy Retail Company, LLC (Texas
Competitive Electric Holding Company, LLC)

Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation (Nissan
North America, Inc.)

Other

55,646

1/31/2029

100%

Office

247,254

2/28/2025

100%

Office

268,445

3/31/2023

100%

British Schools of America, LLC

Other

274,000

8/31/2036

100%

McGuireWoods LLP

Office

330,309

8/31/2030

87%

500 Kinetic Dr.

Huntington

AMZN WVCS LLC (Amazon.com, Inc.)

Office

68,693 11/30/2026

100%

Total

4,153,107

98.7%

In addition, we have a non-consolidated joint venture with a developer, which owns a developable parcel of land in Etna, Ohio.

The 2018 net effective annual base cash rent for our proportionate share of the non-consolidated portfolio as of December 31, 2018
was $16.83 per square foot and the weighted-average remaining lease term was 10.3 years.

The following chart sets forth certain information regarding lease expirations for the next ten years in our consolidated portfolio:

Year
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028

Number of
Lease Expirations
47
17
20
4
8
19
14
10
12
6

Square Feet
2,706,226
3,840,817
4,371,717
516,184
1,163,086
4,851,851
2,916,169
4,191,228
6,536,053
1,892,384

GAAP Base Rent ($000)

16,498
15,934
26,792
6,204
9,766
24,787
15,819
14,357
30,489
12,942

Percentage of
Annual Rent
6.0%
5.8%
9.7%
2.3%
3.5%
9.0%
5.7%
5.2%
11.1%
4.7%

The following chart sets forth the 2018 annual GAAP base rent ($000) based on the credit rating of our consolidated tenants at
December 31, 2018(1):

Investment Grade

Non-investment Grade

Unrated

GAAP Base Rent

Percentage

112,242

54,716

120,369

287,327

39.1%

19.0%

41.9%

100.0%

(1) Credit ratings are based upon either tenant, guarantor or parent/sponsor. Generally, all multi-tenant assets are included in
unrated. See Item 1A “Risk Factors”, above.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

From time to time we are directly and indirectly involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business.
We believe, based on currently available information, and after consultation with legal counsel, that although the outcomes of those
normal course proceedings are uncertain, the results of such proceedings, in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Cummins Inc. v. Lexington Columbus (Jackson Street) L.P. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (State of Indiana, County of Bartholomew,
in the Bartholomew Superior Court). On October 25, 2018, Cummins Inc., the tenant in our Columbus, Indiana office building, filed
a complaint for declaratory relief against Lexington Columbus (Jackson Street) L.P., our property owner subsidiary, and Wells Fargo
Bank, N.A., the trustee for the noteholders with a security interest in the office building. Under the subject lease, Cummins Inc.’s
tenancy extends through July 31, 2024, with options to further extend for additional time periods. Despite failing to timely exercise
a purchase option for the office building that was expressly due by July 15, 2018, where time was of the essence, Cummins Inc. has
asked the court for a declaration that it is entitled to purchase the building at the option price and to terminate the lease effective July
31, 2019. Cummins Inc. does not dispute that it failed to comply with the requirements of the purchase option, but alleges that it is
entitled to relief under several equitable theories. We filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on January 8, 2019. We believe that
Indiana law supports our right to retain ownership of the building, and we intend to vigorously defend this claim.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Executive Officers of Lexington

The following sets forth certain information relating to our executive officers:

Name
T. Wilson Eglin
Age 54

Patrick Carroll
Age 55

Joseph S. Bonventre
Age 43

Beth Boulerice
Age 54

Brendan P. Mullinix
Age 44

Lara Johnson
Age 46

James Dudley
Age 38

Business Experience
Mr. Eglin has served as our Chief Executive Officer since January 2003, our President
since April 1996 and as a trustee since May 1994. He served as one of our Executive
Vice Presidents from October 1993 to April 1996 and our Chief Operating Officer from
October 1993 to December 2010.

Mr. Carroll has served as our Chief Financial Officer since May 1998, our Treasurer
since January 1999 and one of our Executive Vice Presidents since January 2003. Prior
to joining us, Mr. Carroll was, from 1986 to 1998, in the real estate practice of Coopers
& Lybrand L.L.P., a public accounting firm that was one of the predecessors of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Mr. Carroll is a Certified Public Accountant.

Mr. Bonventre has served as our General Counsel since 2004, one of our Executive Vice
Presidents since 2008 and our Secretary since 2014. Prior to joining us in September
2004, Mr. Bonventre was an associate in the corporate department of the law firm now
known as Paul Hastings LLP. Mr. Bonventre is admitted to practice law in the State of
New York.

Ms. Boulerice has served as our Chief Accounting Officer since January 2011 and one
of our Executive Vice Presidents since January 2013. Prior to joining us in January 2007,
Ms. Boulerice was employed by First Winthrop Corporation and was the Chief
Accounting Officer of Newkirk Realty Trust. Ms. Boulerice is a Certified Public
Accountant.

Mr. Mullinix was appointed an executive officer in February 2018 and has served as
one of our Executive Vice Presidents focusing on debt capital markets. Mr. Mullinix
joined us in 1996 and has previously served as a Senior Vice President and a Vice
President.

Ms. Johnson was appointed an executive officer in February 2018 and has served as one
of our Executive Vice Presidents focusing on dispositions and strategic transactions.
Prior to joining us in 2007, Ms. Johnson was an executive vice president of Newkirk
Realty Trust and a member of its board of directors. Ms. Johnson previously served as
senior vice president of Winthrop Financial Associates, as a vice president of Shelbourne
I, Shelbourne II and Shelbourne III, three publicly-traded REITs, and as Director of
Investor Relations for National Property Investors, Inc.

Mr. Dudley was appointed an executive officer in February 2018 and has served as an
Executive Vice President and Director of Asset Management. He has been with the
company since 2006 and has held various roles within the Asset Management
Department. Prior to joining the firm, Mr. Dudley was employed by ORIX Capital
Markets.

Item 5. Market For Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters And Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

PART II.

Market Information. Our common shares are listed for trading on the NYSE under the symbol “LXP”.

Holders. As of March 8, 2019, we had approximately 2,688 common shareholders of record.

Dividends. Since our predecessor's formation in 1993, we have made quarterly distributions without interruption.

While we intend to continue paying regular quarterly dividends to holders of our common shares, the authorization of future
dividend declarations will be at the discretion of our Board of Trustees and will depend on our actual cash flow, our financial condition,
capital requirements, the annual distribution requirements under the REIT provisions of the Code and such other factors as our Board
of Trustees deems relevant. The actual cash flow available to pay dividends will be affected by a number of factors, including, among
others, the risks discussed under “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A and “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations” in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report.

We do not believe that the financial covenants contained in our debt instruments will have any adverse impact on our ability to
pay dividends in the normal course of business to our common and preferred shareholders or to distribute amounts necessary to
maintain our qualification as a REIT.

Direct Share Purchase Plan. We maintain a direct share purchase plan, which has two components, (i) a dividend reinvestment
component and (ii) a direct share purchase component. Under the dividend reinvestment component, common shareholders and
holders of OP units may elect to automatically reinvest their dividends and distributions to purchase our common shares. Under the
direct share purchase component, our current investors and new investors can make optional cash purchases of our common shares.
The administrator of the plan, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., purchases common shares for the accounts of the participants
under the plan, at our discretion, either directly from us, on the open market or through a combination of those two options. In 2016,
we issued approximately 0.6 million common shares under the plan, raising net proceeds of $4.1 million. We did not issue any shares
under the plan in 2018 and 2017.

Equity Compensation Plan Information. The following table sets forth certain information, as of December 31, 2018, with respect
to our Amended and Restated 2011 Equity-Based Award Plan under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance as
compensation.

Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants and rights

Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a))

Plan Category

(a)

(b)

(c)

Equity compensation plans approved
by security holders

Equity compensation plans not
approved by security holders

Total

118,400

—

118,400

7.44

—

7.44

4,012,870

—

4,012,870

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.

We did not issue any common shares during 2018 on an unregistered basis.

Share Repurchase Program.

The following table summarizes common shares/OP units that were repurchased during the fourth quarter of 2018 pursuant to

publicly announced repurchase plans(1):

Period

October 1-31, 2018
November 1-30, 2018(2)
December 1-31, 2018(3)
Total

Total number of
shares/units
purchased

Average price
paid per
share/unit ($)

2,681,215

—

1,298,382

3,979,597

8.06

—

8.08

8.07

Total number of
shares/units
purchased as
part of publicly
announced
plans or
programs

Maximum
number of
shares/units that
may yet be
purchased
under the plans
or programs

2,681,215

2,046,218

—

12,046,218

1,298,382

3,979,597

10,747,836

(1) 10,000,000 share repurchase authorization initially announced on July 2, 2015, which has no expiration date.

(2) On November 2, 2018, the Board of Trustees authorized an additional 10,000,000 common share repurchase authorization.

(3) Excludes 323,521 common shares that were repurchased in December 2018 that were settled in January 2019.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The following sets forth selected consolidated financial data as of and for each of the years in the five-year period ended
December 31, 2018. The selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with Item 7 “Management's Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” below, and the Consolidated Financial Statements and the related
notes set forth in Item 8 “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data”, below. ($000's, except per share data):

Total gross revenues

Expenses applicable to revenues

Interest and amortization expense

Income from continuing operations

Total discontinued operations

Net income

Net income attributable to Lexington Realty Trust

shareholders

Net income attributable to common shareholders
Income from continuing operations per common

share - basic

Income from discontinued operations - basic

Net income per common share - basic

Income from continuing operations per common

share - diluted

Income from discontinued operations per common

share - diluted

Net income per common share - diluted

Cash dividends declared per common share
Net cash provided by operating activities(1)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities(1)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(1)
Real estate assets, net, including real estate -

intangible assets

Total assets

Mortgages, notes payable, credit facility and term

loans, including discontinued operations

Shareholders' equity

Total equity

Preferred share liquidation preference

2018

395,339
(210,866)
(79,880)
230,906

—

230,906

227,415

220,838

0.93

—

0.93

—

0.93

0.71

217,811

554,891
(707,611)

2017

391,641
(223,162)
(77,883)
86,629

2016

429,496
(213,403)
(88,032)
96,450

—

96,450

95,624

89,109

0.38

—

0.38

0.37

—

0.37

0.69

—

86,629

85,583

79,067

0.33

—

0.33

—

0.33

0.7025

227,870
(283,074)
49,581

2015

430,839
(222,853)
(89,739)
113,209

1,682

114,891

111,703

105,100

0.44

0.01

0.45

0.44

0.01

0.45

0.68

2014

423,818

(218,510)

(97,303)

47,842

49,621

97,463

93,104

86,324

0.17

0.21

0.38

0.17

0.21

0.38

0.675

239,810

11,384
(237,301)

245,020
(391,016)
41,426

221,577

(43,984)

(66,351)

2,555,659

2,953,840

3,309,900

3,553,020

3,028,326

3,441,467

3,397,922

3,808,403

3,287,250

3,758,483

1,492,483

1,329,871

1,346,678

96,770

2,068,867

1,323,901

1,340,835

96,770

1,860,598

1,392,777

1,412,491

96,770

2,190,740

1,440,029

1,462,531

96,770

2,076,042

1,485,766

1,508,920

96,770

(1) 2017 to 2014 amounts adjusted for the retrospective application of ASU 2016-15 and ASU 2016-18.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

In this discussion, we have included statements that may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe
harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are not historical facts but
instead represent only our beliefs regarding future events, many of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and outside our
control. These statements may relate to our future plans and objectives, among other things. By identifying these statements for you
in this manner, we are alerting you to the possibility that our actual results may differ, possibly materially, from the anticipated results
indicated in these forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause our results to differ, possibly materially, from those
indicated in the forward-looking statements include, among others, those discussed above in “Risk Factors” in Part I, Item 1A of
this Annual Report and “Cautionary Statements Concerning Forward-Looking Statements” in the beginning of this Annual Report.

Introduction

The following is a discussion and analysis of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Lexington Realty Trust
for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, and significant factors that could affect its prospective financial condition
and results of operations. This discussion should be read together with the accompanying consolidated financial statements of the
Company included herein and notes thereto.

Overview

General. We are a Maryland REIT that owns a portfolio of equity investments in primarily single-tenant commercial properties,

with a focus on industrial properties.

As of December 31, 2018, we had equity ownership interests in approximately 135 consolidated real estate properties, located

in 34 states and encompassing approximately 47.6 million square feet, approximately 95.1% of which was leased.

Business Strategy. Our current business strategy is focused on growing our portfolio of industrial properties, enhancing our cash
flow stability, reducing lease rollover risk and maintaining a strong and flexible balance sheet to allow us to act on opportunities as
they arise. See “Business” in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report for a detailed description of our current business strategy.

We expect our business strategy will enable us to continue to improve our liquidity and strengthen our overall balance sheet.
We believe liquidity and a strong balance sheet will allow us to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities as they arise.

Investment Trends. Making investments in income producing single-tenant net-leased industrial real estate assets is our primary
focus. The challenge we face is finding investments that will provide an attractive return without compromising our real estate or
tenant credit underwriting criteria. We believe we have access to acquisition opportunities due to our relationships with developers,
brokers, corporate users and sellers. However, competition for income producing single-tenant net-leased industrial real estate assets
has increased. When we acquire real estate assets, we generally look for industrial real estate assets which have one or more of the
following characteristics (1) a credit-worthy tenant, (2) adaptability to a variety of users, including multi-tenant use, (3) an attractive
geographic location, and (4) the potential for capital appreciation.

In recent years, demand for space in the suburban office market has not been as strong as demand for space in the industrial
market. We believe this is due to a continuing trend of downsizing of corporate office requirements and an increase in the demand
for regionalized distribution and e-commerce facilities. In addition, industrial assets generally require less capital to maintain and
re-lease than required by office assets. As of December 31, 2018, our percentage of GAAP rent attributable to industrial assets to
total GAAP rent was 65.4% compared to 44.3% as of December 31, 2017. We expect to continue the repositioning of the portfolio
to be more industrial asset based. Our capital recycling strategy may have a near-term dilutive impact on earnings due to sales of
revenue-producing properties, but we believe in the long term this strategy will benefit shareholder value.

We continue to see capitalization rate compression in the acquisition market for existing industrial product. We expect that as
interest rates rise, capitalization rates will rise. However, with the significant amount of competition in the current acquisition market
for industrial assets, capitalization rates have continued to compress or hold steady even as interest rates rise.

The recent demand for industrial assets has allowed developers to obtain construction financing from traditional banks and build
on a speculative basis, which has limited our opportunities in the industrial build-to-suit market. In an effort to gain more exposure
to the build-to-suit industrial market, in December 2017, we acquired a 90% interest in a joint venture with a developer that acquired
a developable parcel of land. The joint venture intends to source industrial build-to-suit projects for the land and in December 2018,
Kohl's Corporation committed to the first build-to-suit project for a 1.2 million square foot warehouse/distribution facility, which is
expected to be completed in 2020 and is subject to a ground lease with us.

Some of our industrial investments are, and we expect in the future some will be, subject to leases with shorter terms than
historically held in our portfolio because we believe renewal and retenanting risks are mitigated because of the fungibility of certain
industrial assets.

We generally mitigate our cost exposure for build-to-suit properties and forward commitments by requiring purchase agreements,
development agreements and/or loan agreements to specify a maximum price and/or loan commitment amount prior to our investment.
Cost overruns are generally the responsibility of the developer or, in some cases, the prospective tenant. To further mitigate risk, we
believe we perform stringent underwriting procedures such as, among other items, (1) requiring payment and performance bonds
and/or completion guarantees from developers and/or contractors; (2) engaging third-party construction consultants and/or engineers
to monitor construction progress and quality; (3) only hiring developers with a proven history of performance; (4) requiring developers
to provide financial statements and in some cases personal guarantees from principals; (5) obtaining and reviewing detailed plans
and construction budgets; (6) requiring a long-term tenant lease to be executed prior to funding; and (7) securing liens on the property
to the extent of construction funding.

We believe that, despite the addition of some shorter-term industrial leases, the long-term leases with escalating rents we have
in our portfolio are strengthening our future cash flows by providing a hedge against rising interest rates, extending our weighted-
average lease term, balancing our lease expiration schedule, reducing the average age of our portfolio and supporting our dividend
objectives.

The following is a summary of our investment activity for the year ended December 31, 2018:

Property Acquisitions(1)

Location

Property Type

Square Feet
(000's)

Capitalized Cost
(millions)

Approximate
Lease Term
(Years)

Date Acquired

Olive Branch, MS

Edwardsville, IL

Spartanburg, SC

Pasadena, TX

Carrollton, TX

Goodyear, AZ

Chester, VA

Industrial

716

1,170

1,018

342

258

357

540

1,034

5,435

44.1

48.5

44.2

27.6

23.9

19.6

41.4

66.3

315.6

2Q 2018

3Q 2018

4Q 2018

(1) We acquired a 57-acre parcel of land from a non-consolidated joint venture and leased the parcel to a tenant to develop an industrial property.

The following is a summary of our investment activity for the year ended December 31, 2017:

Property Acquisitions

Location

Property Type

Square Feet
(000's)

Capitalized Cost
(millions)

Approximate
Lease Term
(Years)

Date Acquired

New Century, KS

Lebanon, IN

Cleveland, TN

Grand Prairie, TX

San Antonio, TX
McDonough, GA(1)

Byhalia, MS

Jackson, TN

Smyrna, TN

Lafayette, IN

Romulus, MI

Warren, MI

Winchester, VA

Industrial

447

742

851

215

849

1,121

616

1,062

1,505

309

500

260

400

8,877

12.1

36.2

34.4

24.3

45.5

66.7

36.6

57.9

104.9

17.4

38.9

47.0

36.7

558.6

1Q 2017

2Q 2017

3Q 2017

4Q 2017

Completed Build-to-Suit Transactions

Location

Property Type

Lake Jackson, TX(2)
Charlotte, NC

Opelika, AL

Office

Industrial

Square Feet
(000's)

Initial
Capitalized Cost
(millions)

Lease Term
(Years)

275

201

165

641

70.4

61.3

37.3

169.0

Date
Acquired/
Completed

1Q 2017

2Q 2017

3Q 2017

Capitalized Cost
Per Square Foot

256.09

304.49

225.20

(1) Square footage includes a 220-thousand-square-foot expansion which was completed in 2018.

(2) Completed the construction on the final building of a four-building project. Initial cost basis excludes developer partner payout of $8.0 million.

Leasing Trends. Re-leasing properties that are currently vacant or as leases expire at favorable effective rates is one of our
primary asset management focuses. The primary risks associated with re-tenanting properties are (1) the period of time required to
find a new tenant, (2) whether rental rates will be lower than under previous leases, (3) the significance of leasing costs such as
commissions and tenant improvement allowances and (4) the payment of capital expenditures and operating costs such as real estate
taxes, insurance and maintenance with no offsetting revenue.

Our property owner subsidiaries seek to mitigate these risks by (1) staying in close contact with our tenants during the lease
term in order to assess the tenant's current and future occupancy needs, (2) maintaining relationships with local brokers to determine
the depth of the rental market and (3) retaining local expertise to assist in the re-tenanting of a property. However, no assurance can
be given that once a property becomes vacant it will subsequently be re-let. Generally, a tenant in a single-tenant office property
commences lease extension discussions well in advance of lease expiration. If the lease has a year or less remaining until expiration,
generally, there is a high likelihood that the tenant will not extend the lease for the entire property or at all. Industrial renewals are
generally not as time sensitive due to the minimal capital expenditures upon renewal as compared with office property renewals.

If a property cannot be re-let to a single user and the property can be adapted to multi-tenant use, we determine whether the
costs of adapting the property to multi-tenant use outweigh the benefit of funding operating costs while searching for a single-tenant
and whether selling a vacant property, which limits operating costs and allows us to redeploy capital, is in the best interest of our
shareholders.

Certain of the long-term leases on properties in which we have an ownership interest contain provisions that may mitigate the
adverse impact of inflation on our operating results. Such provisions include clauses entitling us to receive (1) scheduled fixed base
rent increases and (2) base rent increases based upon the consumer price index. In addition, a majority of the leases on the single-
tenant properties in which we have an ownership interest require tenants to pay operating expenses, including maintenance, real
estate taxes, insurance and utilities, thereby reducing our exposure to increases in costs and operating expenses. In addition, the
leases on single-tenant properties in which we have an ownership interest are generally structured in a way that minimizes our
responsibility for capital improvements. However, certain of our leases provide for some level of landlord responsibility for capital
repairs and replacements, the cost of which is generally factored into the rental rate.

Our motivation to release vacant space requires us to meet market demands with respect to rental rates, tenant concessions and
landlord responsibilities. As a result, the obligations of our property owner subsidiaries on new leases and newly renewed or extended
leases generally increase to include, among other items, some form of responsibility for capital repairs and replacements.

During 2018, we entered into 29 consolidated new leases and lease extensions encompassing approximately 1.9 million square
feet. The average GAAP base rent on these extended leases was approximately $10.11 per square foot compared to the average
GAAP base rent on these leases before extension of $9.36 per square foot. The weighted-average cost of tenant improvements and
lease commissions during 2018 was approximately $20.08 per square foot for new leases and $2.07 per square foot for extended
leases. Due to the nature of the expected lease rollovers in coming years, particularly office assets, renewal rents may be lower than
expiring rents and aggregate tenant improvement allowances and leasing costs may decrease from their current levels in such years.
The impact of any such lower renewal rent may be mitigated by our capital recycling strategy and our long-term leases with annual
or periodic rent increases.

We continue to monitor the credit of tenants of properties in which we have an interest by (1) subscribing to rating agency
information, so that we can monitor changes in the ratings of our rated tenants, (2) reviewing financial statements that are publicly
available or that are required to be delivered to us under the applicable lease, (3) monitoring news reports regarding our tenants and
their respective businesses and (4) monitoring the timeliness of rent collections.

During 2017 and 2016, we conveyed in foreclosure or via a deed-in-lieu of foreclosure certain properties in which we had an
interest as we deemed the balance of the non-recourse mortgage loans encumbering the properties were in excess of the value of the
property collateral. Our property owner subsidiaries may convey properties to lenders or the property owner subsidiary may declare
bankruptcy in the future if there is no or limited recourse to us and a property owner subsidiary is unable to refinance, re-let or sell
its vacated property or if a tenant renews at a lower rent or a new tenant pays a lower rent that does not justify a value of the property
in excess of the mortgage loan balance.

Impairment charges. During 2018, 2017 and 2016, we incurred impairment charges on certain of our assets, excluding loan
receivables, of $95.8 million, $39.7 million and $100.2 million, respectively, due to each asset's carrying value being below its
estimated fair value. Most of the impairment charges in 2018 and 2017 were incurred on non-core assets due to anticipated shortened
holding periods. In 2016, we incurred impairment charges primarily due to the write-off of the deferred rent receivable for the sold
New York, New York land investments. The real estate assets we sold that resulted in impairment charges were primarily non-core
assets including land investments, retail properties and under performing and multi-tenant properties. We cannot estimate if we will
incur, or the amount of, future impairment charges on our assets. See Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors”, of this Annual Report.

Critical Accounting Policies. Our accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP,
which require our management to make estimates that affect the amounts of revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities reported and
related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. A summary of our significant accounting policies which are important to the
portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations is set forth in note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, which
are included in “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report.

The following is a summary of our critical accounting policies, which require some of management's most difficult, subjective

and complex judgments.

The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property (which includes land, building and improvements and fixtures and
equipment) is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant. The “as-if-vacant” value is then allocated to land and building
and improvements based on our management's determination of relative fair values of these assets. Factors considered by our
management in performing these analyses include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods considering
current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, our management includes real estate taxes,
insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rental revenue during the expected lease-up periods based on current
market demand. Our management also estimates costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions. Our management
generally retains a third party to assist in the allocations.

In allocating the fair value of the identified intangible assets and liabilities of an acquired property, above-market and below-
market lease values are recorded based on the difference between the current in-place lease rent and management's estimate of current
market rents. Below-market lease intangibles are recorded as part of deferred revenue and amortized into rental revenue over the
non-cancelable periods and bargain renewal periods of the respective leases. Above-market leases are recorded as part of intangible
assets and amortized as a direct charge against rental revenue over the non-cancelable portion of the respective leases.

The aggregate value of other acquired intangible assets, which may consist of in-place leases and/or tenant relationship values,
is measured by the excess of (1) the purchase price paid for a property over (2) the estimated fair value of the property as if vacant,
determined as set forth above. This aggregate value is allocated between in-place lease values and tenant relationship values based
on management's evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant's lease. The value of in-place leases is amortized to expense
over the remaining non-cancelable periods and any bargain renewal periods of the respective leases. The value of tenant relationships
is amortized to expense over the applicable lease term plus expected renewal periods.

Revenue Recognition. We recognize lease revenue on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease unless another systematic
and rational basis is more representative of the time pattern in which the use benefit is derived from the leased property. Revenue is
recognized on a contractual basis for leases with escalations tied to a consumer price index with no floor. Renewal options in leases
with rental terms that are lower than those in the primary term are excluded from the calculation of straight line rent if the renewals
are not reasonably assured. In those instances in which we fund tenant improvements and the improvements are deemed to be owned
by us, revenue recognition will commence when the improvements are substantially completed and possession or control of the space
is turned over to the tenant. When we determine that the tenant allowances are lease incentives, we commence revenue recognition
when possession or control of the space is turned over to the tenant for tenant work to begin. The lease incentive is recorded as a
deferred expense and amortized as a reduction of revenue on a straight-line basis over the respective lease term. We recognize lease
termination fees as rental revenue in the period received and write off unamortized leases related intangibles and other lease related
account balances, provided that there are no further obligations under the lease. Otherwise, such fees and balances are recognized
on a straight-line basis over the remaining obligation period.

Impairment of Real Estate. We evaluate the carrying value of all tangible and intangible real estate assets for possible impairment
when an event or change in circumstance has occurred that indicates its carrying value may not be recoverable. The evaluation
includes estimating and reviewing anticipated future undiscounted cash flows to be derived from the asset. If such cash flows are
less than the asset's carrying value, an impairment charge is recognized to the extent by which the asset's carrying value exceeds the
estimated fair value. Estimating future cash flows is highly subjective and such estimates could differ materially from actual results.

Cybersecurity. While we have yet to experience a cyber attack that disrupted our operations in any material respect, all companies,
including ours, need to allocate funds to address and protect against cybersecurity threats. Due to the small size of our organization,
we rely on third-parties to provide advice and services with respect to cybersecurity, which is not currently, but could become, a
material cost.

Liquidity

General. Since becoming a public company, our principal sources of liquidity have been (1) undistributed cash flows generated
from our investments, (2) the public and private equity and debt markets, (3) property specific debt, (4) corporate level borrowings,
(5) commitments from co-investment partners and (6) proceeds from the sales of our investments.

Our ability to incur additional debt to fund acquisitions is dependent upon our existing leverage, the value of the assets we are
attempting to leverage and general economic and credit market conditions, which may be outside of management's control or influence.

Cash Flows. We believe that cash flows from operations will continue to provide adequate capital to fund our operating and
administrative expenses, regular debt service obligations and all dividend payments in accordance with REIT requirements in both
the short-term and long-term. In addition, we anticipate that cash on hand, corporate level borrowings, capital recycling proceeds,
issuances of equity and debt, mortgage proceeds and our other principal sources of liquidity will be available to provide the necessary
capital required to fund our operations and allow us to grow.

Cash flows from operations as reported in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows totaled $217.8 million for 2018, $227.9
million for 2017 and $239.8 million for 2016. Cash flows from operations have been decreasing primarily due to dispositions as we
reshape our portfolio to have a higher concentration of industrial assets versus other asset types. Industrial assets, as compared with
office assets, generally provide for less rental revenue due to lower capitalization rates than can be obtained from office assets. The
underlying drivers that impact working capital and therefore cash flows from operations are the timing of (1) the collection of rents
and tenant reimbursements and loan interest payments from borrowers, and (2) the payment of interest on mortgage debt and operating
and general and administrative costs. We believe the net-lease structure of the leases encumbering a majority of the properties in
which we have an interest mitigates the risks of the timing of cash flows from operations since the payment and timing of operating
costs related to the properties are generally borne directly by the tenant. Collection and timing of tenant rents is closely monitored
by management as part of our cash management program.

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities totaled $554.9 million in 2018, $(283.1) million in 2017 and $11.4 million
in 2016. Cash provided by investing activities related primarily to proceeds from the sale of properties, collection of loans receivable,
distributions from non-consolidated entities in excess of accumulated earnings and changes in deposits. Cash used in investing
activities related primarily to investments in real estate properties, co-investment programs, payments of deferred leasing costs and
changes in deposits. Therefore, the fluctuation in investing activities relates primarily to the timing of investments and dispositions.

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities totaled $(707.6) million in 2018, $49.6 million in 2017 and $(237.3) million
in 2016. Cash provided by financing activities was primarily attributable to net proceeds from the issuance of common shares, and
non-recourse mortgage and corporate borrowings. Cash used in financing activities related primarily to dividend and distribution
payments, repurchases of common shares, redemption of a noncontrolling interest, payments of deferred financing costs, payment
of developer liabilities and debt payments and repurchases.

Public and Private Equity and Debt Markets. We access the public and private equity and debt markets when we (1) believe
conditions are favorable and (2) have a compelling use of proceeds. Due to our borrowing capacity under our unsecured revolving
credit facility and proceeds from dispositions and mortgage financings, we did not access the public debt markets in 2018, 2017 or
2016.

During 2015, our Board of Trustees authorized a 10.0 million common share repurchase program. The share repurchase program
does not expire. During 2018, we repurchased and retired approximately 5.9 million common shares for an aggregate $47.2 million,
which was at an average price of $8.05 per share. During 2018, our Board of Trustees increased the authorization by an additional
10.0 million shares and approximately 10.7 million common shares remain available for repurchase at December 31, 2018. We have
continued to, and in the future may, repurchase our common shares in the context of our overall capital plan, and to the extent we
believe market volatility offers prudent investment opportunities based on our common share price versus net asset value per share.

We expect to continue to access debt and equity markets in the future to implement our business strategy and to fund future
growth. However, general economic uncertainty and the volatility in these markets can make accessing these markets more difficult
at times.

UPREIT Structure. Our UPREIT structure permits us to effect acquisitions by issuing OP units to a property owner as a form
of consideration in exchange for the property. Substantially all outstanding OP units are redeemable by the holder at certain times
on a one OP unit for approximately 1.13 common shares basis or, at our election, with respect to certain OP units, cash. Substantially
all outstanding OP units require us to pay quarterly distributions to the holders of such OP units equal to the dividends paid to our
common shareholders on an as redeemed basis and the remaining OP units have stated distributions in accordance with their applicable
partnership agreement. To the extent that our dividend per share is less than a stated distribution per unit per the applicable partnership
agreement, the stated distributions per unit are reduced by the percentage reduction in our dividend. We are party to a funding
agreement with our operating partnership under which we may be required to fund distributions made on account of OP units. No
OP units have a liquidation preference. In recent years there has not been a great demand for OP units and, as a result, we expect the
percentage of common shares that will be outstanding in the future relative to OP units will increase, and income attributable to
noncontrolling interests should be expected to decrease, as such OP units are redeemed for our common shares. Furthermore, our
credit agreement requires us to own at least 95.5% of Lepercq Corporate Income Fund L.P., or LCIF.

As of December 31, 2018, there were 3.2 million OP units outstanding which were convertible into 3.6 million common shares

assuming we satisfied redemptions entirely with common shares.

Property Specific Debt. As of December 31, 2018, our consolidated property owner subsidiaries had aggregate balloon payments
of $76.1 million and $32.0 million maturing in 2019 and 2020, respectively. With respect to mortgages encumbering properties where
the expected lease rental revenues are sufficient to provide an estimated property value in excess of the mortgage balance, we believe
our property owner subsidiaries have sufficient sources of liquidity to meet these obligations through future cash flows from operations,
the credit markets and, if determined appropriate by us, a capital contribution from us from either cash on hand ($168.8 million at
December 31, 2018), property sale proceeds or borrowing capacity on our primary credit facility ($505.0 million as of December 31,
2018, subject to covenant compliance).

In the event that the estimated property value is less than the mortgage balance, as the mortgages encumbering the properties
in which we have an interest are generally non-recourse to us and the property owner subsidiaries, a property owner subsidiary may,
if appropriate, satisfy a mortgage obligation by transferring title of the property to the lender or permitting a lender to foreclose.
There are significant risks associated with conveying properties to lenders through foreclosure which are described in "Risk Factors"
in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report.

In 2018, 2017 and 2016, we obtained, through our consolidated property owner subsidiaries, $26.4 million, $45.4 million and
$254.7 million, respectively, in non-recourse mortgage loans with interest rates ranging from 4.0% to 5.4% and maturity dates ranging
from 2022 to 2036. Our secured debt decreased to approximately $575.5 million at December 31, 2018 compared to $697.1 million
at December 31, 2017. We expect to continue to use property specific, non-recourse mortgages in certain situations as we believe
that by properly matching a debt obligation, including the balloon maturity risk, with the terms of a lease, our cash-on-cash returns
increase and the exposure to residual valuation risk is reduced. In addition, we may procure credit tenant lease financing in certain
situations where we are able to monetize all or a significant portion of the rental revenues of a property at an attractive rate. We
believe our financing strategy will also allow us to further lower our financing costs and improve our cash flow, financial flexibility
and certain credit metrics.

Corporate Borrowings. The following Senior Notes were outstanding as of December 31, 2018:

Issue Date
May 2014
June 2013

Face Amount
(millions)

Interest Rate

250.0
250.0
500.0

4.40%
4.25%

Maturity Date
June 2024
June 2023

Issue Price

99.883%
99.026%

The Senior Notes are unsecured and pay interest semi-annually in arrears. We may redeem the Senior Notes at our option at any

time prior to maturity in whole or in part by paying the principal amount of the Senior Notes being redeemed plus a premium.

During 2018, our unsecured credit agreement with KeyBank National Association, as agent, was amended to release LCIF as a
borrower and make other related changes. A summary of the significant terms of our unsecured credit agreement, as of December
31, 2018, are as follows:

$505.0 Million Revolving Credit Facility(1)
$300.0 Million Term Loan(2)

Maturity Date

Interest Rate

08/2019

01/2021

LIBOR + 1.00%

LIBOR + 1.10%

(1) Maturity date can be extended to August 2020 at our option. The interest rate ranges from LIBOR plus 0.85% to 1.55%. At December 31, 2018, the unsecured

revolving credit facility had no borrowing outstanding and availability of $505.0 million subject to covenant compliance.

(2) The interest rate ranges from LIBOR plus 0.90% to 1.75%. We had aggregate interest-rate swap agreements to fix the LIBOR component at a weighted-average
rate of 1.42% through January 2019 on $255.0 million of the $300.0 million outstanding LIBOR-based borrowings. During 2018, we satisfied in full the $300
million term loan due in 2020.

As of December 31, 2018, we were in compliance with the financial covenants contained in our corporate level debt agreements.

During 2007, we issued $200.0 million in Trust Preferred Securities, which bore interest at a fixed rate of 6.804% through April
2017 and, thereafter, bears interest at a variable rate of three month LIBOR plus 170 basis points. These securities are (1) classified
as debt, (2) due in 2037 and (3) currently redeemable by us. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, there were $129.1 million of these
securities outstanding.

Co-investment Programs and Joint Ventures. We have entered into co-investment programs and joint ventures with institutional
investors and other real estate companies to mitigate our risk in certain assets and increase our return on equity to the extent we earn
management or other fees. However, investments in co-investment programs and joint ventures limit our ability to make investment
decisions unilaterally relating to the assets and limit our ability to deploy capital. Due to our size, we do not expect to enter into co-
investment programs and joint ventures seeking future investments, except with developers for industrial assets. In 2018, we sold
21 office assets to a newly-formed joint venture in which we acquired a 20% interest. We believe this joint venture complemented
our current business strategy by partially reducing our exposure to office assets.

Capital Recycling. Part of our strategy to effectively manage our balance sheet involves pursuing and executing well on property
dispositions and recycling of capital. During 2018, we disposed of our interests in certain consolidated properties for an aggregate
gross price of $1.1 billion, which included the sale of a 21-office asset portfolio to the newly-formed joint venture. These proceeds
were used to retire indebtedness encumbering properties in which we have an interest and corporate debt obligations and make
investments.

As capitalization rates have compressed in recent years, we have continued to look at opportunities to recycle capital with a
focus on capturing the value of our multi-tenant and retail properties and reducing our exposure to the suburban office sector. The
increase in asset values may result in our selling more properties than we acquire in any given year. We will continue to look at
capital recycling opportunities as part of the ongoing effort to further transform our portfolio, with a greater emphasis on suburban
office dispositions and non-core asset dispositions, in individual or portfolio transactions. We believe capital recycling (1) provides
cost effective and timely capital support for our investment activities and (2) allows us to maintain line capacity and cash in advance
of what we expect to be a growing investment pipeline.

Liquidity Needs. Our principal liquidity needs are the contractual obligations set forth under the heading “Contractual

Obligations,” below, and the payment of dividends to our shareholders and distributions to the holders of OP units.

As of December 31, 2018, we had approximately $1.5 billion of indebtedness, consisting of mortgages and notes payable
outstanding, a term loan, 4.40% and 4.25% Senior Notes and Trust Preferred Securities, with a weighted-average interest rate of
approximately 4.0%. The ability of a property owner subsidiary to make debt service payments depends upon the rental revenues of
its property and its ability to refinance the mortgage related thereto, sell the related property, or access capital from us or other sources.
A property owner subsidiary's ability to accomplish such goals will be affected by numerous economic factors affecting the real
estate industry, including the risks described under "Risk Factors" in Part I, Item 1A of this Annual Report.

If we are unable to satisfy our contractual obligations and other operating costs with our cash flow from operations, we intend
to use borrowings and proceeds from issuances of equity or debt securities. If a property owner subsidiary is unable to satisfy its
contractual obligations and other operating costs, it may default on its obligations and lose its assets in foreclosure or through
bankruptcy proceedings.

We elected to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code, commencing with our taxable year ended
December 31, 1993. If we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal corporate income taxes on our
net taxable income that is currently distributed to shareholders.

In connection with our intention to continue to qualify as a REIT for federal income tax purposes, we expect to continue paying
regular dividends to our shareholders. These dividends are expected to be paid from operating cash flows and/or from other sources.
Since cash used to pay dividends reduces amounts available for capital investments, we generally intend to maintain a conservative
dividend payout ratio, reserving such amounts as we consider necessary for the maintenance or expansion of properties in our
portfolio, debt reduction, the acquisition of interests in new properties as suitable opportunities arise, and such other factors as our
Board of Trustees considers appropriate.

We paid approximately $175.5 million in cash dividends to our common and preferred shareholders in 2018. Although our
property owner subsidiaries receive the majority of our base rental payments on a monthly basis, we intend to continue paying
dividends quarterly. Amounts accumulated in advance of each quarterly distribution are invested by us in short-term money market
or other suitable instruments.

Capital Resources

General. Due to the net-lease structure of a majority of our investments, our property owner subsidiaries historically have not
incurred significant expenditures in the ordinary course of business to maintain the properties in which we have an interest. As leases
expire, we expect our property owner subsidiaries to incur costs in extending the existing tenant leases, re-tenanting the properties
with a single-tenant, or converting the property to multi-tenant use. The amounts of these expenditures can vary significantly depending
on tenant negotiations, market conditions and rental rates.

Single-Tenant Properties. We do not anticipate significant capital expenditures at the single-tenant properties in which we have
an interest that are subject to net or similar leases since the tenants at these properties generally bear all or substantially all of the
cost of property operations, maintenance and repairs. However, at certain properties subject to net leases, our property owner
subsidiaries are responsible for replacement and/or repair of certain capital items, which may or may not be reimbursed. In addition,
at certain single-tenant properties that are not subject to a net lease, our property owner subsidiaries have a level of property operating
expense responsibility, which may or may not be reimbursed.

Multi-Tenant Properties. Primarily as a result of non-renewals at single-tenant net-lease properties, we have interests in multi-
tenant properties in our consolidated portfolio. While tenants are generally responsible for increases over base year expenses, our
property owner subsidiaries are generally responsible for the base-year expenses and capital expenditures, and are responsible for
all expenses related to vacant space, at these properties.

Vacant Properties. To the extent there is a vacancy in a property, our property owner subsidiary would be obligated for all
operating expenses, including capital expenditures, real estate taxes and insurance. When a property is vacant, our property owner
subsidiary may incur substantial capital expenditure and releasing costs to re-tenant the property. However, we believe that, over the
long term, our focus on industrial assets will result in significant savings compared to investing in office assets due to the lower
operating and retenanting costs of industrial assets compared to office assets.

Property Expansions. Under certain leases, tenants have the right to expand the facility located on a property in which we have
an interest. In the past, our property owner subsidiary has generally funded, and in the future our property owner subsidiary may
fund, these property expansions with either additional secured borrowings, the repayment of which was, and will be, funded out of
rental increases under the leases covering the expanded properties, or capital contributions from us.

Ground Leases. The tenants of properties in which we have an interest generally pay the rental obligations on ground leases
either directly to the fee holder or to our property owner subsidiary as increased rent. However, our property owner subsidiaries are
responsible for these payments (1) under certain leases without reimbursement and (2) at vacant properties.

Environmental Matters. Based upon management's ongoing review of the properties in which we have an interest, management
is not aware of any environmental condition with respect to any of these properties that would be reasonably likely to have a material
adverse effect on us. There can be no assurance, however, that (1) the discovery of environmental conditions, which were previously
unknown, (2) changes in law, (3) the conduct of tenants or (4) activities relating to properties in the vicinity of the properties in which
we have an interest, will not expose us to material liability in the future. Changes in laws increasing the potential liability for
environmental conditions existing on properties or increasing the restrictions on discharges or other conditions may result in significant
unanticipated expenditures or may otherwise adversely affect the operations of the tenants of properties in which we have an interest.

Results of Operations

Year ended December 31, 2018 compared with December 31, 2017. The increase in total gross revenues in 2018 of $3.7 million
was primarily attributable to an increase in rental revenue of $4.9 million, offset by a decrease in tenant reimbursements of $1.2
million. The increase in rental revenue was primarily due to revenue from properties acquired in 2018 and 2017 of $34.9 million
and the acceleration of below-market lease intangible accretion on three retail assets of $10.4 million, partially offset by a reduction
of $39.9 million of rental revenue due to property sales and a $0.3 million decrease in revenue recognized from lease terminations.

Depreciation and amortization decreased by $5.8 million primarily due to the sale of real estate properties in 2018 and 2017.

The decrease in property operating expense of $6.5 million was primarily due to reduced operating costs associated with sold
properties, including vacant properties and a reduction in transaction costs, partially offset by 2018 and 2017 property acquisitions
with operating expense responsibilities and an increase in operating costs at certain properties due to tax abatements expiring.

The decrease in general and administrative expense of $2.5 million was primarily due to a decrease in professional fees, primarily

legal costs incurred in a litigation.

The $2.05 million litigation settlement recognized in 2017 represented the settlement amount related to a lender claim regarding

an office property that we owned in Bridgewater, New Jersey.

Non-operating income decreased by $6.9 million primarily due to the collection of loans receivable in 2017 and $3.9 million
of earnings recognized in 2017 due to the write-off of unearned contingent acquisition consideration relating to a prior build-to-suit
project.

The increase in interest and amortization expense of $2.0 million was primarily due to an increase in our overall borrowing rate

and amount of debt outstanding during the period, coupled with a reduction in capitalized interest.

The change in debt satisfaction charges, net, of $8.8 million was primarily due to the timing of debt retirements, including the

repayment of the 2020 term loan.

The increase in impairment charges of $50.8 million related to the timing of impairment charges recognized on certain properties,
primarily due to potential sales, vacancies and lack of leasing prospects. The increase was also due to our intention to dispose of
non-industrial assets, thus shortening the holding period of certain assets.

The increase in gains on sales of properties of $189.5 million related primarily to the timing of sales of our properties, and was

principally comprised of $174.6 million relating to the sale/contribution of 21 office assets to NNN JV.

The change in equity in earnings (losses) of non-consolidated entities of $2.6 million was primarily due to the timing of gains
recognized on the sale of non-consolidated investments and an impairment charge recognized in 2017 on our investment in Palm
Beach Gardens, Florida where the sole tenant filed for bankruptcy.

The increase in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests of $2.4 million was primarily due to an increase in net income

of LCIF in 2018 compared to 2017.

The increase in net income attributable to common shareholders of $141.8 million was primarily due to the items discussed

above.

Year ended December 31, 2017 compared with December 31, 2016. The decrease in total gross revenues in 2017 of $37.9 million
was primarily attributable to a decrease in rental revenue of $38.2 million. The decrease in rental revenue was primarily due to a
reduction of $66.1 million of rental revenue due to property sales, and a $14.1 million decrease in revenue recognized from lease
terminations, partially offset by revenue from property acquisitions in 2017 and 2016 of $42.9 million.

Depreciation and amortization increased by $7.9 million primarily due to the acquisition of real estate properties in 2017 and

2016.

The increase in property operating expense of $1.8 million was primarily due to costs incurred on properties acquired in 2017
and 2016, costs incurred on vacant properties prior to sale and an increase in transaction costs, offset by reduced operating costs
associated with sold properties.

The increase in general and administrative expense of $3.1 million was primarily due to an increase in professional fees, primarily

legal costs incurred in a litigation.

The $2.05 million litigation settlement recognized in 2017 represented the settlement amount related to a lender claim regarding

an office property that we owned in Bridgewater, New Jersey.

Non-operating income decreased by $2.7 million primarily due to the collection of loans receivable in 2017, partially offset by
$3.9 million of earnings recognized in 2017 due to the write-off of unearned contingent acquisition consideration relating to a prior
build-to-suit project.

The decrease in interest and amortization expense of $10.1 million was primarily due to the satisfaction of mortgage debt in

connection with property sales and a decrease in the interest rate on our $129.1 million of trust preferred securities.

The change in debt satisfaction gains, net, of $7.2 million was primarily due to the timing of debt retirements, including

foreclosures.

The decrease in impairment charges of $55.2 million related primarily to the impairment recognized on the sale of three land

investments in New York, New York due to the write-off of the deferred rent receivable in 2016.

The decrease in gains on sales of properties of $18.1 million related primarily to the timing of sales of our properties.

The increase in the provision for income taxes of $0.5 million related primarily to state taxes.

The change in equity in earnings (losses) of non-consolidated entities of $8.4 million was primarily due to the timing of gains
recognized on the sale of non-consolidated investments, partially offset by an impairment charge recognized in 2017 on our investment
in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida where the sole tenant filed for bankruptcy.

The decrease in net income attributable to common shareholders of $10.0 million was primarily due to the items discussed

above.

The increase in net income or decrease in net loss in future periods will be closely tied to the level of acquisitions made by us.
Without acquisitions, the sources of growth in net income are limited to fixed rent adjustments and index adjustments (such as the
consumer price index), reduced interest expense on amortizing mortgages and variable rate indebtedness and by controlling other
variable overhead costs. However, there are many factors beyond management's control that could offset these items including,
without limitation, increased interest rates and tenant monetary defaults and the other risks described in this Annual Report.

Same-Store Results

Same-store net operating income, or NOI, which is a non-GAAP measure, represents the NOI for consolidated properties that were
owned and included in our portfolio for three comparable reporting periods. We define NOI as operating revenues (rental income
(less GAAP rent adjustments and lease termination income), tenant reimbursements and other property income) less property operating
expenses. As same-store NOI excludes the change in NOI from acquired and disposed of properties, it highlights operating trends
such as occupancy levels, rental rates and operating costs on properties. Other REITs may use different methodologies for calculating
same-store NOI, and accordingly same-store NOI may not be comparable to other REITs. Management believes that same-store NOI
is a useful supplemental measure to be used by Management and investors to assess the Company's operating performance. However,
same-store NOI should not be viewed as an alternative measure of the Company's financial performance since it does not reflect the
operations of the Company's entire portfolio, nor does it reflect the impact of general and administrative expenses, acquisition-related
expenses, interest expense, depreciation and amortization costs, other nonproperty income and losses, the level of capital expenditures
and leasing costs necessary to maintain the operating performance of the Company's properties, or trends in development and
construction activities which are significant economic costs and activities that could materially impact the Company's results of
operations. Lexington believes that net income is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to same-store NOI.

The following presents our consolidated same-store NOI, for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 ($000):

Total cash base rent
Tenant reimbursements
Property operating expenses
Same-store NOI

2018

2017

2016

202,233
12,993
(23,729)
191,497

202,690
11,233
(22,137)
191,786

201,862
11,740
(20,730)
192,872

Our reported same-store NOI decreased from 2017 to 2018 by 0.2% and decreased by 0.6% from 2016 to 2017. The primary reason
for the decrease in same-store NOI between periods primarily related to vacancy. As of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, our
historical same-store square footage leased was 92.1%, 98.9% and 99.1%, respectively.

Below is a reconciliation of net income to same-store NOI for periods presented:

Twelve Months ended December 31,
2017

2016

2018

Net income

230,906

86,629

96,450

Interest and amortization expense
Provision for income taxes
Depreciation and amortization
General and administrative
Litigation settlement
Transaction costs
Non-operating income
Gains on sales of properties
Impairment charges and loan losses
Debt satisfaction (gains) charges, net
Equity in (earnings) losses of non-consolidated entities
Lease termination income
Straight-line adjustments
Lease incentives
Amortization of above/below market leases

NOI

Less NOI:
Acquisitions and dispositions
Same-Store NOI

Funds From Operations

79,880
1,728
168,191
31,662
—
260
(3,491)
(252,913)
95,813
2,596
(1,708)
(2,755)
(20,968)
1,686
(10,132)

320,755

77,883
1,917
173,968
34,158
2,050
2,171
(10,378)
(63,428)
44,996
(6,196)
848
(3,242)
(19,784)
1,969
1,544

325,105

88,032
1,439
166,048
31,104
—
836
(13,043)
(81,510)
100,236
975
(7,590)
(17,363)
(37,748)
1,673
2,057

331,596

(129,258)
191,497

(133,319)
191,786

(138,724)
192,872

We believe that Funds from Operations, or FFO, which is a non-GAAP measure, is a widely recognized and appropriate measure
of the performance of an equity REIT. We believe FFO is frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties
in the evaluation of REITs, many of which present FFO when reporting their results. FFO is intended to exclude GAAP historical
cost depreciation and amortization of real estate and related assets, which assumes that the value of real estate diminishes ratably
over time. Historically, however, real estate values have risen or fallen with market conditions. As a result, FFO provides a performance
measure that, when compared year over year, reflects the impact to operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating
costs, development activities, interest costs and other matters without the inclusion of depreciation and amortization, providing
perspective that may not necessarily be apparent from net income.

The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, defines FFO as “net income (calculated in accordance
with GAAP), excluding depreciation and amortization related to real estate, gains and losses from the sales of certain real estate
assets, gains and losses from change in control and impairment write-downs of certain real estate assets and investments in entities
when the impairment is directly attributable to decreases in the value of depreciable real estate held by the entity. The reconciling
items include amounts to adjust earnings from consolidated partially-owned entities and equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates
to FFO.” FFO does not represent cash generated from operating activities in accordance with GAAP and is not indicative of cash
available to fund cash needs.

We present FFO available to common shareholders and unitholders - basic and also present FFO available to all equityholders
and unitholders - diluted on a company-wide basis as if all securities that are convertible, at the holder's option, into our common
shares, are converted at the beginning of the period. We also present Adjusted Company FFO available to all equityholders and
unitholders - diluted, which adjusts FFO available to all equityholders and unitholders - diluted for certain items which we believe
are not indicative of the operating results of our real estate portfolio. We believe this is an appropriate presentation as it is frequently
requested by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties. Since others do not calculate these measures in a similar
fashion, these measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures as reported by others. These measures should not be
considered as an alternative to net income as an indicator of our operating performance or as an alternative to cash flow as a measure
of liquidity.

The following presents a reconciliation of net income attributable to common shareholders to FFO available to common
shareholders and unitholders and Adjusted Company FFO available to all equityholders and unitholders for each of the years in the
three year period ended December 31, 2018 (dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts):

2018

2017

2016

FUNDS FROM OPERATIONS:

Basic and Diluted:

Net income attributable to common shareholders

220,838

79,067

89,109

Adjustments:

Depreciation and amortization

Impairment charges - real estate, including non-consolidated entities

Noncontrolling interests - OP units

Amortization of leasing commissions

Joint venture and noncontrolling interest adjustment

Gains on sales of properties, including non-consolidated entities and net of tax

FFO available to common shareholders and unitholders - basic

Preferred dividends

Interest and amortization on 6.00% Convertible Guaranteed Notes

Amount allocated to participating securities

FFO available to all equityholders and unitholders - diluted

Litigation settlement

Debt satisfaction (gains) charges, net, including non-consolidated entities

Impairment loss - loan receivable

Unearned contingent acquisition consideration
Other(1)

Adjusted Company FFO available to all equityholders and unitholders -

diluted

Per Common Share and Unit Amounts

Basic:

FFO

Diluted:

FFO

Adjusted Company FFO

Weighted-Average Common Shares:
Basic:

164,261

95,813

2,528

3,930

4,063

(254,269)

237,164

6,290

—

287

243,741

—

2,596

—

(10,038)

168,683

43,214

147

5,285

1,121

(64,880)

232,637

6,290

—

226

159,363

100,236

(159)

6,684

1,111

(87,468)

268,876

6,290

532

225

239,153

275,923

2,050

(6,174)

5,294

(3,922)

2,171

—

975

—

837

236,299

238,572

277,735

0.99

0.96

1.13

0.99

0.96

0.97

1.13

1.14

Weighted-average common shares outstanding - basic EPS
Operating partnership units(2)
Weighted-average common shares outstanding - basic FFO

236,666,375
3,616,120
240,282,495

237,758,408
3,693,144
241,451,552

233,633,058
3,815,621
237,448,679

Diluted:

Weighted-average common shares outstanding - diluted EPS
Unvested share-based payment awards
6.00% Convertible Guaranteed Notes
Preferred shares - Series C
Weighted-average common shares outstanding - diluted FFO

240,810,990
—
—
4,710,570
245,521,560

241,537,837
666,127
—
4,710,570
246,914,534

237,679,031
549,049
1,077,626
4,710,570
244,016,276

(1) "Other" primarily consisted of the acceleration of below-market lease intangible accretion in 2018 and transaction related costs in 2017 and 2016.
(2) Includes OP units other than OP units held by us.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, 2018, we had investments in various real estate entities with varying structures. The real estate investments
owned by these entities are generally financed with non-recourse debt. Non-recourse debt is generally defined as debt whereby the
lenders' sole recourse with respect to borrower defaults is limited to the value of the assets collateralized by the debt. The lender
generally does not have recourse against any other assets owned by the borrower or any of the members or partners of the borrower,
except for certain specified exceptions listed in the particular loan documents. These exceptions generally relate to "bad boy" acts,
including fraud, prohibited transfers and breaches of material representations. We have guaranteed such obligations for certain of
our non-consolidated entities.

Contractual Obligations

The following summarizes our principal contractual obligations as of December 31, 2018 ($000's):

Mortgages and notes payable(1)
Term loans payable

Senior notes payable
Trust preferred securities
Interest payable(2)
Operating lease obligations(3)

2019

2020

2021

2022

2023

$ 101,887

55,143

40,465

22,120

23,998

2024 and
Thereafter
$ 331,901

Total

575,514

—

—
—

—

—
—

60,716

5,121

56,650

5,123

300,000

—
—

44,081

5,094

—

—
—

42,173

5,169

—

250,000
—

35,527

5,312

—

250,000
129,120

152,607

31,261

300,000

500,000
129,120

391,754

57,080

$ 167,724

$ 116,916

$ 389,640

69,462

$ 314,837

$ 894,889

$ 1,953,468

1. Includes balloon payments.
2. Includes variable-rate debt at the rate in effect at December 31, 2018. Variable-rate debt as of December 31, 2018 is comprised of $129.1 million Trust Preferred
Securities (90-day LIBOR plus 1.7% and matures 2037) and $45.0 million term loan (LIBOR plus 1.1% and matures 2021). Also a $255.0 million term loan,
which was subject to interest rate swap agreements that expired in in January 2019, bears interest at LIBOR plus 1.1% after expiration of the interest rate swap
agreements.

3. Includes ground lease payments and office rents. Amounts disclosed do not include rents that adjust to fair market value. In addition, certain ground lease payments

due under bond leases allow for a right of offset between the lease obligation and the debt service and accordingly are not included.

In addition, from time to time we may guarantee certain tenant improvement allowances and lease commissions on behalf of
certain property owner subsidiaries when required by the related tenant or lender. However, we do not believe these guarantees are
material to us as the obligations under and risks associated with such guarantees are priced into the rent under the lease or the value
of the property.

New Accounting Pronouncements

For a discussion of new accounting pronouncements, see note 2 "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" to our

consolidated financial statements included in this report.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market-Risk

Our exposure to market risk relates primarily to our variable-rate indebtedness not subject to interest rate swaps and our fixed-
rate debt. Our consolidated aggregate principal variable-rate indebtedness was $174.1 million and $384.1 million at December 31,
2018 and 2017, respectively, which represented 11.6% and 18.4%, respectively, of our aggregate principal consolidated indebtedness.
During 2018 and 2017, our variable-rate indebtedness had a weighted-average interest rate of 3.2% and 2.7%, respectively. Had the
weighted-average interest rate been 100 basis points higher, our interest expense for 2018 and 2017 would have increased by $4.9
million and $1.7 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, our aggregate principal consolidated fixed-rate debt was
$1.3 billion and $1.7 billion, respectively, which represented 88.4% and 81.6%, respectively, of our aggregate principal indebtedness.

For certain of our financial instruments, fair values are not readily available since there are no active trading markets as
characterized by current exchanges between willing parties. Accordingly, we derive or estimate fair values using various valuation
techniques, such as computing the present value of estimated future cash flows using discount rates commensurate with the risks
involved. However, the determination of estimated cash flows may be subjective and imprecise. Changes in assumptions or estimation
methodologies can have a material effect on these estimated fair values. The following fair value was determined using the interest
rates that we believe our outstanding fixed-rate debt would warrant as of December 31, 2018 and is indicative of the interest rate
environment as of December 31, 2018, and does not take into consideration the effects of subsequent interest rate fluctuations.
Accordingly, we estimate that the fair value of our fixed-rate debt was $1.3 billion as of December 31, 2018.

Our interest rate risk objectives are to limit the impact of interest rate fluctuations on earnings and cash flows and to lower our
overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, we manage our exposure to fluctuations in market interest rates through the
use of fixed-rate debt instruments to the extent that reasonably favorable rates are obtainable with such arrangements. We have
historically entered into derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps or caps to mitigate our interest rate risk on a
related financial instrument or to effectively lock the interest rate on a portion of our variable-rate debt. As of December 31, 2018,
we had five interest rate swap agreements in our consolidated portfolio, all of which expired in January 2019.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2018, December 31, 2017 and December 31,

2016

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2018, December 31, 2017

and December 31, 2016

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2018, December 31, 2017 and

December 31, 2016

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as of December 31, 2018, December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the shareholders and Trustees of Lexington Realty Trust

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Lexington Realty Trust and subsidiaries (the "Company") as
of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity
and cash flows, for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes and the schedule listed in
the Index at Item 15 for the year ended December 31, 2018 (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion,
the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and
2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2018, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in
Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
and our report dated March 12, 2019, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are
required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable
rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error
or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether
due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis,
evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

New York, New York
March 12, 2019

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2017.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the shareholders and Trustees of Lexington Realty Trust

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Lexington Realty Trust and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of
December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects,
effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control -
Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
(PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018, of the Company and our report
dated March 12, 2019, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal
Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with
respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities
and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and
performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets
of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are
being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that
could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

New York, New York
March 12, 2019

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Trustees and Shareholders
Lexington Realty Trust:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), changes in equity, and
cash flows for Lexington Realty Trust and subsidiaries (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2016. In connection with
our audit, we also have audited the accompanying financial statement schedule III for the year ended December 31, 2016. The
2016 consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on
our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures
in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the results of Lexington Realty Trust
and subsidiaries’ operations and their cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2016 in conformity with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic
consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein for
the year ended December 31, 2016.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for how
certain cash receipts and cash payments, as well as restricted cash, are presented and classified in the consolidated statement of
cash flows in 2016 due to the adoption of ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash
Receipts and Cash Payments, and ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash, respectively.

(signed) KPMG LLP

New York, New York
February 28, 2017, except for the first paragraph

of New Accounting Standards Adopted in 2018 in
Note 2, as to which the date is March 12, 2019

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
($000, except share and per share data)
As of December 31,

Assets:
Real estate, at cost
Real estate - intangible assets

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization

Real estate, net
Assets held for sale
Cash and cash equivalents
Restricted cash
Investment in and advances to non-consolidated entities
Deferred expenses (net of accumulated amortization of $27,397 in 2018 and $35,072 in 2017)
Rent receivable - current
Rent receivable – deferred
Other assets
Total assets

Liabilities and Equity:
Liabilities:
Mortgages and notes payable, net
Revolving credit facility borrowings
Term loans payable, net
Senior notes payable, net
Trust preferred securities, net
Dividends payable
Liabilities held for sale
Accounts payable and other liabilities
Accrued interest payable
Deferred revenue - including below market leases (net of accumulated accretion of $17,606 in 2018

and $26,081 in 2017)

Prepaid rent
Total liabilities

Commitments and contingencies
Equity:
Preferred shares, par value $0.0001 per share; authorized 100,000,000 shares,

Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred, liquidation preference $96,770 and 1,935,400 shares

issued and outstanding

Common shares, par value $0.0001 per share; authorized 400,000,000 shares, 235,008,554 and

240,689,081 shares issued and outstanding in 2018 and 2017, respectively

Additional paid-in-capital
Accumulated distributions in excess of net income
Accumulated other comprehensive income

Total shareholders’ equity

Noncontrolling interests

Total equity

Total liabilities and equity

2018

2017

3,090,134
419,612
3,509,746
954,087
2,555,659
63,868
168,750
8,497
66,183
15,937
3,475
58,692
12,779
2,953,840

570,420
—
298,733
496,034
127,296
48,774
386
30,790
4,523

20,531
9,675
1,607,162

3,936,459
599,091
4,535,550
1,225,650
3,309,900
2,827
107,762
4,394
17,476
31,693
5,450
52,769
20,749
3,553,020

689,810
160,000
596,663
495,198
127,196
49,504
—
38,644
5,378

33,182
16,610
2,212,185

94,016

24
2,772,855
(1,537,100)
76
1,329,871
16,807
1,346,678
2,953,840

24
2,818,520
(1,589,724)
1,065
1,323,901
16,934
1,340,835
3,553,020

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
($000, except share and per share data)
Years ended December 31,

2018

2017

2016

364,731

359,832

Gross revenues:

Rental

Tenant reimbursements

Total gross revenues

Expense applicable to revenues:

Depreciation and amortization

Property operating

General and administrative

Litigation settlement

Non-operating income

Interest and amortization expense

Debt satisfaction gains (charges), net

Impairment charges and loan losses

Gains on sales of properties

Income before provision for income taxes, equity in earnings (losses)

of non-consolidated entities and discontinued operations

Provision for income taxes

Equity in earnings (losses) of non-consolidated entities

Net income

Less net income attributable to noncontrolling interests

Net income attributable to Lexington Realty Trust shareholders

Dividends attributable to preferred shares – Series C – 6.50% rate

Allocation to participating securities

Net income attributable to common shareholders
Net income attributable to common shareholders - per common share

basic

Weighted-average common shares outstanding – basic

Net income attributable to common shareholders - per common share

diluted

30,608

395,339

(168,191)
(42,675)
(31,662)
—

3,491
(79,880)
(2,596)
(95,813)
252,913

230,926
(1,728)
1,708

230,906
(3,491)
227,415
(6,290)
(287)
220,838

0.93

31,809

391,641

(173,968)
(49,194)
(34,158)
(2,050)
10,378
(77,883)
6,196
(44,996)
63,428

89,394
(1,917)
(848)
86,629
(1,046)
85,583
(6,290)
(226)
79,067

0.33

398,065

31,431

429,496

(166,048)
(47,355)
(31,104)
—

13,043
(88,032)
(975)
(100,236)
81,510

90,299
(1,439)
7,590

96,450
(826)
95,624
(6,290)
(225)
89,109

0.38

236,666,375

237,758,408

233,633,058

0.93

0.33

0.37

Weighted-average common shares outstanding – diluted

240,810,990

241,537,837

237,679,031

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
($000)
Years ended December 31,

Net income

Other comprehensive income (loss):

Change in unrealized gain (loss) on interest rate swaps, net

Other comprehensive income (loss)

Comprehensive income

Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests

Comprehensive income attributable to Lexington Realty Trust shareholders

2018

2017

2016

230,906

86,629

96,450

(989)
(989)
229,917
(3,491)
226,426

2,098
2,098

88,727
(1,046)
87,681

906
906

97,356
(826)
96,530

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

S
E
I
R
A
I
D
I
S
B
U
S
D
E
T
A
D
I
L
O
S
N
O
C
D
N
A
T
S
U
R
T
Y
T
L
A
E
R
N
O
T
G
N
I
X
E
L

Y
T
I
U
Q
E
N
I
S
E
G
N
A
H
C
F
O
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
D
E
T
A
D
I
L
O
S
N
O
C

)
s
t
n
u
o
m
a

e
r
a
h
s

t
p
e
c
x
e

0
0
0
$
(

8
1
0
2

,
1
3
r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
d
e
d
n
e

r
a
e
Y

g
n
i
l
l
o
r
t
n
o
c
n
o
N

e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
C

s
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
I

e
m
o
c
n
I

d
e
t
a
l
u
m
u
c
c
A

r
e
h
t
O

d
e
t
a
l
u
m
u
c
c
A

s
n
o
i
t
u
b
i
r
t
s
i
D

f
o

s
s
e
c
x
E
n
i

e
m
o
c
n
I

t
e
N

l
a
n
o
i
t
i
d
d
A

-
n
i
-
d
i
a
P

l
a
t
i
p
a
C

n
o
m
m
o
C

s
e
r
a
h
S

f
o

r
e
b
m
u
N

n
o
m
m
o
C

s
e
r
a
h
S

d
e
r
r
e
f
e
r
P

s
e
r
a
h
S

f
o

r
e
b
m
u
N

d
e
r
r
e
f
e
r
P

s
e
r
a
h
S

l
a
t
o
T

s
r
e
d
l
o
h
e
r
a
h
S

t
s
u
r
T
y
t
l
a
e
R
n
o
t
g
n
i
x
e
L

4
3
9
,
6
1

5
6
0
,
1

)
4
2
7
,
9
8
5
,
1
(

0
2
5
,
8
1
8
,
2
$

4
2

1
8
0
,
9
8
6
,
0
4
2

6
1
0
,
4
9

0
0
4
,
5
3
9
,
1

5
3
8
,
0
4
3
,
1
$

7
1
0
2

1
3

r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
e
c
n
a
l
a
B

—

)
9
8
1
(

—

)
9
2
4
,
3
(

1
9
4
,
3

—

)
9
8
9
(

—

6
1

—

)
7
0
8
,
4
7
1
(

5
1
4
,
7
2
2

9
8
1

)
8
5
8
,
9
4
(

5
1
1

0
2
5
,
6

)
4
4
5
,
2
(

)
7
8
(

—

7
0
8
,
6
1

6
7

)
0
0
1
,
7
3
5
,
1
(

5
5
8
,
2
7
7
,
2
$

—

4
2

8
8
3
,
3
5

)
2
5
2
,
1
5
8
,
5
(

0
9
3
,
6
1

—

1
9
7
,
6
6
9

)
2
9
7
,
1
7
2
(

)
2
5
0
,
4
9
5
(

—

)
8
5
8
,
9
4
(

5
1
1

0
2
5
,
6

)
4
4
5
,
2
(

)
1
7
(

)
9
8
9
(

)
6
3
2
,
8
7
1
(

6
0
9
,
0
3
2

P
O
g
n
i
l
l
o
r
t
n
o
c
n
o
n

f
o

n
o
i
t
p
m
e
d
e
R

s
e
r
a
h
s

n
o
m
m
o
c

r
o
f

s
t
i
n
u

s
e
r
a
h
s

n
o
m
m
o
c

f
o

e
s
a
h
c
r
u
p
e
R

e
r
a
h
s

n
o
m
m
o
c

e
e
y
o
l
p
m
e

f
o

e
s
i
c
r
e
x
E

s
n
o
i
t
p
o

d
n
a

s
e
r
a
h
s

n
o
m
m
o
c

f
o

e
c
n
a
u
s
s
I

n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c

d
e
r
r
e
f
e
d

t
e
n

,
n
o
i
t
a
z
i
t
r
o
m
a

o
t

s
e
r
a
h
s

n
o
m
m
o
c

f
o

e
s
a
h
c
r
u
p
e
R

s
n
o
i
t
a
g
i
l
b
o

x
a
t

e
l
t
t
e
s

n
o
m
m
o
c

e
e
y
o
l
p
m
e

f
o

e
r
u
t
i
e
f
r
o
F

s
e
r
a
h
s

s
n
o
i
t
u
b
i
r
t
s
i
d
/
s
d
n
e
d
i
v
i
D

e
m
o
c
n
i

t
e
N

s
s
o
l

e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
c

r
e
h
t
O

4
5
5
,
8
0
0
,
5
3
2

6
1
0
,
4
9

0
0
4
,
5
3
9
,
1

8
7
6
,
6
4
3
,
1
$

8
1
0
2

1
3

r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
e
c
n
a
l
a
B

.
s
t
n
e
m
e
t
a
t
s

l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
f

d
e
t
a
d
i
l
o
s
n
o
c

e
h
t

f
o

t
r
a
p

l
a
r
g
e
t
n
i

n
a

e
r
a

s
e
t
o
n

g
n
i
y
n
a
p
m
o
c
c
a

e
h
T

2
6

S
E
I
R
A
I
D
I
S
B
U
S
D
E
T
A
D
I
L
O
S
N
O
C
D
N
A
T
S
U
R
T
Y
T
L
A
E
R
N
O
T
G
N
I
X
E
L

Y
T
I
U
Q
E
N
I
S
E
G
N
A
H
C
F
O
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
D
E
T
A
D
I
L
O
S
N
O
C

)
s
t
n
u
o
m
a

e
r
a
h
s

t
p
e
c
x
e

0
0
0
$
(

7
1
0
2

,
1
3
r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
d
e
d
n
e

r
a
e
Y

g
n
i
l
l
o
r
t
n
o
c
n
o
N

s
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
I

e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
C

)
s
s
o
L
(

e
m
o
c
n
I

d
e
t
a
l
u
m
u
c
c
A

r
e
h
t
O

d
e
t
a
l
u
m
u
c
c
A

s
n
o
i
t
u
b
i
r
t
s
i
D

f
o

s
s
e
c
x
E
n
i

e
m
o
c
n
I

t
e
N

l
a
n
o
i
t
i
d
d
A

-
n
i
-
d
i
a
P

l
a
t
i
p
a
C

n
o
m
m
o
C

s
e
r
a
h
S

f
o

r
e
b
m
u
N

n
o
m
m
o
C

s
e
r
a
h
S

d
e
r
r
e
f
e
r
P

s
e
r
a
h
S

f
o

r
e
b
m
u
N

d
e
r
r
e
f
e
r
P

s
e
r
a
h
S

l
a
t
o
T

s
r
e
d
l
o
h
e
r
a
h
S

t
s
u
r
T
y
t
l
a
e
R
n
o
t
g
n
i
x
e
L

4
1
7
,
9
1

)
3
3
0
,
1
(

)
6
6
9
,
0
0
5
,
1
(

6
3
7
,
0
0
8
,
2
$

4
2

7
7
1
,
7
3
0
,
8
3
2

6
1
0
,
4
9

0
0
4
,
5
3
9
,
1

1
9
4
,
2
1
4
,
1
$

6
1
0
2

1
3

r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
e
c
n
a
l
a
B

)
4
8
5
(

—

)
2
4
2
,
3
(

6
4
0
,
1

—

8
9
0
,
2

—

3
8
5
,
5
8

)
1
4
3
,
4
7
1
(

4
8
5

8
7
4

—

3
7
6
,
4
2

)
1
5
9
,
7
(

4
3
9
,
6
1

5
6
0
,
1

)
4
2
7
,
9
8
5
,
1
(

0
2
5
,
8
1
8
,
2
$

—

4
2

—

6
4
7
,
0
4
1

6
0
1
,
1
5
1

2
5
0
,
0
6
3
,
2

—

8
7
4

3
7
6
,
4
2

)
1
5
9
,
7
(

)
3
8
5
,
7
7
1
(

9
2
6
,
6
8

8
9
0
,
2

e
r
a
h
s

n
o
m
m
o
c

e
e
y
o
l
p
m
e

f
o

e
s
i
c
r
e
x
E

P
O
g
n
i
l
l
o
r
t
n
o
c
n
o
n

f
o

n
o
i
t
p
m
e
d
e
R

s
e
r
a
h
s

n
o
m
m
o
c

r
o
f

s
t
i
n
u

s
n
o
i
t
p
o

d
n
a

s
e
r
a
h
s

n
o
m
m
o
c

f
o

e
c
n
a
u
s
s
I

n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c

d
e
r
r
e
f
e
d

t
e
n

,
n
o
i
t
a
z
i
t
r
o
m
a

t
s
e
r
e
t
n
i

y
t
i
u
q
e

s
'
r
e
n
t
r
a
p

e
r
u
t
n
e
v

t
n
i
o
j

d
e
t
a
d
i
l
o
s
n
o
c

f
o

n
o
i
t
i
s
i
u
q
c
A

e
m
o
c
n
i

e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
c

r
e
h
t
O

s
n
o
i
t
u
b
i
r
t
s
i
d
/
s
d
n
e
d
i
v
i
D

e
m
o
c
n
i

t
e
N

1
8
0
,
9
8
6
,
0
4
2

6
1
0
,
4
9

0
0
4
,
5
3
9
,
1

5
3
8
,
0
4
3
,
1
$

7
1
0
2

1
3

r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
e
c
n
a
l
a
B

.
s
t
n
e
m
e
t
a
t
s

l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
f

d
e
t
a
d
i
l
o
s
n
o
c

e
h
t

f
o

t
r
a
p

l
a
r
g
e
t
n
i

n
a

e
r
a

s
e
t
o
n

g
n
i
y
n
a
p
m
o
c
c
a

e
h
T

3
6

S
E
I
R
A
I
D
I
S
B
U
S
D
E
T
A
D
I
L
O
S
N
O
C
D
N
A
T
S
U
R
T
Y
T
L
A
E
R
N
O
T
G
N
I
X
E
L

Y
T
I
U
Q
E
N
I
S
E
G
N
A
H
C
F
O
S
T
N
E
M
E
T
A
T
S
D
E
T
A
D
I
L
O
S
N
O
C

)
s
t
n
u
o
m
a

e
r
a
h
s

t
p
e
c
x
e

0
0
0
$
(

6
1
0
2

,
1
3
r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
d
e
d
n
e

r
a
e
Y

s
t
s
e
r
e
t
n
I

s
s
o
L

g
n
i
l
l
o
r
t
n
o
c
n
o
N

e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
C

d
e
t
a
l
u
m
u
c
c
A

r
e
h
t
O

d
e
t
a
l
u
m
u
c
c
A

s
n
o
i
t
u
b
i
r
t
s
i
D

f
o

s
s
e
c
x
E
n
i

e
m
o
c
n
I

t
e
N

l
a
n
o
i
t
i
d
d
A

-
n
i
-
d
i
a
P

l
a
t
i
p
a
C

n
o
m
m
o
C

s
e
r
a
h
S

f
o

r
e
b
m
u
N

n
o
m
m
o
C

s
e
r
a
h
S

d
e
r
r
e
f
e
r
P

s
e
r
a
h
S

f
o

r
e
b
m
u
N

d
e
r
r
e
f
e
r
P

s
e
r
a
h
S

l
a
t
o
T

s
r
e
d
l
o
h
e
r
a
h
S

t
s
u
r
T
y
t
l
a
e
R
n
o
t
g
n
i
x
e
L

2
0
5
,
2
2

)
9
3
9
,
1
(

)
8
0
9
,
8
2
4
,
1
(

7
3
8
,
6
7
7
,
2
$

3
2

5
2
2
,
5
7
5
,
4
3
2

6
1
0
,
4
9

0
0
4
,
5
3
9
,
1

1
3
5
,
2
6
4
,
1
$

5
1
0
2

1
3

r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
e
c
n
a
l
a
B

—

)
0
1
2
(

6
2
8

—

)
4
0
4
,
3
(

—

6
0
9

—

4
2
6
,
5
9

)
2
8
6
,
7
6
1
(

0
1
2

)
3
7
9
,
8
(

7
2
0
,
2
1

)
1
0
1
,
1
(

6
3
7
,
1
2

—

4
1
7
,
9
1

)
3
3
0
,
1
(

)
6
6
9
,
0
0
5
,
1
(

6
3
7
,
0
0
8
,
2
$

—

4
2

9
4
5
,
8
4

)
3
1
1
,
4
8
1
,
1
(

9
6
2
,
2
9
8
,
1

2
1
4
,
0
7
1

5
3
8
,
4
3
5
,
2

—

)
3
7
9
,
8
(

7
2
0
,
2
1

)
1
0
1
,
1
(

7
3
7
,
1
2

)
6
8
0
,
1
7
1
(

6
0
9

0
5
4
,
6
9

P
O
g
n
i
l
l
o
r
t
n
o
c
n
o
n

f
o

n
o
i
t
p
m
e
d
e
R

s
e
r
a
h
s

n
o
m
m
o
c

r
o
f

s
t
i
n
u

s
e
t
o
n

e
l
b
i
t
r
e
v
n
o
c

f
o

n
o
i
s
r
e
v
n
o
c

n
o
p
u

s
e
r
a
h
s

n
o
m
m
o
c

f
o

e
c
n
a
u
s
s
I

s
e
r
a
h
s

n
o
m
m
o
c

f
o

e
s
a
h
c
r
u
p
e
R

e
r
a
h
s

n
o
m
m
o
c

e
e
y
o
l
p
m
e

f
o

e
s
i
c
r
e
x
E

s
n
o
i
t
p
o

d
n
a

s
e
r
a
h
s

n
o
m
m
o
c

f
o

e
c
n
a
u
s
s
I

n
o
i
t
a
s
n
e
p
m
o
c

d
e
r
r
e
f
e
d

t
e
n

,
n
o
i
t
a
z
i
t
r
o
m
a

e
m
o
c
n
i

e
v
i
s
n
e
h
e
r
p
m
o
c

r
e
h
t
O

s
n
o
i
t
u
b
i
r
t
s
i
d
/
s
d
n
e
d
i
v
i
D

e
m
o
c
n
i

t
e
N

7
7
1
,
7
3
0
,
8
3
2

6
1
0
,
4
9

0
0
4
,
5
3
9
,
1

1
9
4
,
2
1
4
,
1
$

6
1
0
2

1
3

r
e
b
m
e
c
e
D
e
c
n
a
l
a
B

.
s
t
n
e
m
e
t
a
t
s

l
a
i
c
n
a
n
i
f

d
e
t
a
d
i
l
o
s
n
o
c

e
h
t

f
o

t
r
a
p

l
a
r
g
e
t
n
i

n
a

e
r
a

s
e
t
o
n

g
n
i
y
n
a
p
m
o
c
c
a

e
h
T

4
6

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
($000)
Years ended December 31,

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization
Gains on sales of properties
Debt satisfaction (gains) charges, net
Impairment charges and loan losses
Straight-line rents
Other non-cash (income) expense, net
Equity in (earnings) losses of non-consolidated entities
Distributions of accumulated earnings from non-consolidated entities
Unearned contingent acquisition consideration
Deferred taxes, net
Change in accounts payable and other liabilities
Change in rent receivable and prepaid rent, net
Change in accrued interest payable
Other adjustments, net

Net cash provided by operating activities:

Cash flows from investing activities:

Investment in real estate, including intangible assets
Investment in real estate under construction
Capital expenditures
Net proceeds from sale of properties
Net proceeds from sale of non-consolidated investment
Principal payments received on loans receivable
Investments in and advances to non-consolidated entities, net
Distributions from non-consolidated entities in excess of accumulated earnings
Payments of deferred leasing costs
Change in real estate deposits

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

Cash flows from financing activities:

Dividends to common and preferred shareholders
Conversion of convertible notes
Principal amortization payments
Principal payments on debt, excluding normal amortization
Proceeds of mortgages and notes payable
Term loan payments
Proceeds from term loans
Revolving credit facility borrowings
Revolving credit facility payments
Payment of early extinguishment of debt charges
Payment of developer liabilities
Payments of deferred financing costs
Cash distributions to noncontrolling interests
Redemption of a noncontrolling interest
Repurchase of common shares
Issuance of common shares, net of costs and repurchases to settle tax obligations

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

Change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, at beginning of year
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, at end of year

2018

2017

2016

230,906

86,629

96,450

172,088
(252,913)
2,596
95,813
(20,207)
(3,060)
(1,708)
2,083
—
—
(129)
(3,942)
(891)
(2,825)
217,811

(315,959)
—
(15,506)
898,514
—
—
(10,206)
3,330
(4,522)
(760)
554,891

(175,537)
—
(29,666)
(14,599)
26,350
(300,000)
—
150,000
(310,000)
(5)
—
(690)
(3,429)
—
(47,217)
(2,818)
(707,611)
65,091
112,156
177,247

177,561
(63,428)
(6,196)
44,996
(19,568)
8,093
848
403
(3,922)
—
(1,141)
2,922
16
657
227,870

(558,571)
(83,274)
(15,184)
223,853
6,127
139,042
(9,898)
531
(6,526)
20,826
(283,074)

(172,101)
—
(30,082)
(50,797)
45,400
—
95,000
270,000
(110,000)
(1,326)
—
(2,124)
(3,242)
(7,951)
—
16,804
49,581
(5,623)
117,779
112,156

170,038
(81,510)
975
100,236
(37,445)
1,656
(7,590)
815
—
59
(1,657)
(1,825)
808
(1,200)
239,810

(167,797)
(132,192)
(4,408)
370,038
—
2,214
(37,240)
8,175
(6,558)
(20,848)
11,384

(165,858)
(672)
(26,796)
(109,973)
254,650
—
—
95,000
(272,000)
(5,603)
(4,016)
(1,842)
(3,404)
—
(8,973)
12,186
(237,301)
13,893
103,886
117,779

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
($000, except share/unit data)

(1)

The Company

Lexington Realty Trust (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, except when the context only applies to the parent entity,
the “Company”) is a Maryland statutory real estate investment trust (“REIT”) that owns a diversified portfolio of equity
investments in single-tenant commercial properties.

As of December 31, 2018, the Company had equity ownership interests in approximately 135 consolidated properties located
in 34 states. The properties in which the Company has an interest are primarily net-leased to tenants in various industries.

The Company believes it has qualified as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).
Accordingly, the Company will not be subject to federal income tax, provided that distributions to its shareholders equal at
least the amount of its REIT taxable income as defined under the Code. The Company is permitted to participate in certain
activities from which it was previously precluded in order to maintain its qualification as a REIT, so long as these activities
are conducted in entities which elect to be treated as taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRS”) under the Code. As such, the TRS
are subject to federal income taxes on the income from these activities.

The Company conducts its operations either directly or indirectly through (1) property owner subsidiaries and lender
subsidiaries, which are single purpose entities, (2) an operating partnership, Lepercq Corporate Income Fund L.P. (“LCIF”),
in which the Company is the sole unit holder of the general partner and the sole unit holder of the limited partner that holds
a majority of the limited partner interests, (3) a wholly-owned TRS, Lexington Realty Advisors, Inc. (“LRA”), and (4)
investments in joint ventures. References to “OP Units” refer to units of limited partner interests in LCIF. Property owner
subsidiaries are landlords under leases for properties in which the Company has an interest and/or borrowers under loan
agreements secured by properties in which the Company has an interest and lender subsidiaries are lenders under loan
agreements where the Company made an investment in a loan asset, but in all cases are separate and distinct legal entities.
Each property owner subsidiary is a separate legal entity that maintains separate books and records. The assets and credit
of each property owner subsidiary with a property subject to a mortgage loan are not available to creditors to satisfy the
debt and other obligations of any other person, including any other property owner subsidiary or any other affiliate.
Consolidated entities that are not property owner subsidiaries do not directly own any of the assets of a property owner
subsidiary (or the general partner, member or managing member of such property owner subsidiary), but merely hold
partnership, membership or beneficial interest therein, which interests are subordinate to the claims of such property owner
subsidiary's (or its general partner's, member's or managing member's) creditors.

(2)

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation and Consolidation. The Company's consolidated financial statements are prepared on the accrual
basis of accounting in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The financial statements
reflect the accounts of the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. The Company consolidates its wholly-owned
subsidiaries, partnerships and joint ventures which it controls (i) through voting rights or similar rights or (ii) by means
other than voting rights if the Company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity ("VIE"). Entities which the
Company does not control and entities which are VIEs in which the Company is not the primary beneficiary are accounted
for under appropriate GAAP.

The Company is the primary beneficiary of certain VIEs as it has a controlling financial interest in these entities. LCIF,
which is consolidated and in which the Company has an approximate 96% interest, is a VIE.

The Company had a joint venture limited partnership that owned the Lake Jackson, Texas property, with a developer which
was a consolidated VIE. In 2017, upon the closeout of the build-to-suit project, the developer earned notional capital of
$7,951, which was simultaneously redeemed by the limited partnership for $7,951. The Company treated the payment as
a reduction in shareholders equity in accordance with ASC 810-10-45-23. As a result, the limited partnership, which is still
consolidated, is wholly-owned by the Company and no longer a VIE.

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
($000, except share/unit data)

The assets of each VIE are only available to satisfy such VIE's respective liabilities. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017,
the VIEs' mortgages and notes payable were non-recourse to the Company. Below is a summary of selected financial data
of consolidated VIEs for which the Company is the primary beneficiary included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
December 31, 2018 and 2017:

Real estate, net

Total assets

Mortgages and notes payable, net

Total liabilities

December 31, 2018

December 31, 2017

509,916

607,963

192,791

203,322

682,587

766,025

212,792

226,331

In addition, the Company acquires, from time to time, properties using a reverse like-kind exchange structure pursuant to
Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code (a "reverse 1031 exchange") and, as such, the properties are in the possession
of an Exchange Accommodation Titleholder ("EAT") until the reverse 1031 exchange is completed. The EAT is classified
as a VIE as it is a “thinly capitalized” entity. The Company consolidates the EAT because it is the primary beneficiary as it
has the ability to control the activities that most significantly impact the EAT's economic performance and can collapse the
reverse 1031 exchange structure at any time. The assets of the EAT primarily consist of leased property (net real estate and
intangibles).

Earnings Per Share. Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) reduced by preferred
dividends and amounts allocated to certain non-vested share-based payment awards, if applicable, by the weighted-average
number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share amounts are similarly computed
but include the effect, when dilutive, of in-the-money common share options and non-vested common shares, OP units and
put options of certain convertible securities.

Use of Estimates. Management has made a number of significant estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of
assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses
to prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP. These estimates and assumptions are based
on management's best estimates and judgment. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis
using historical experience and other factors, including the economic environment. Management adjusts such estimates
when facts and circumstances dictate. The most significant estimates made include the recoverability of accounts receivable,
allocation of property purchase price to tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed, the determination
of VIEs and which entities should be consolidated, the determination of impairment of long-lived assets and equity method
investments, valuation of derivative financial instruments, valuation of awards granted under compensation plans and the
useful lives of long-lived assets. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

Fair Value Measurements. The Company follows the guidance in the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")
Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures ("Topic 820"), to
determine the fair value of financial and non-financial instruments. Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework
for measuring fair value in GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Topic 820 establishes a fair value
hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three levels: Level 1 - quoted
prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities; Level 2 - observable
prices that are based on inputs not quoted in active markets, but corroborated by market data; and Level 3 - unobservable
inputs, which are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level
1 inputs and the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs. In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that
maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible, as well as
considering counterparty credit risk. The Company has formally elected to apply the portfolio exception within Topic 820
with respect to measuring counterparty risk for all of its derivative transactions subject to master netting arrangements.

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
($000, except share/unit data)

Revenue Recognition. The Company recognizes lease revenue on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease unless
another systematic and rational basis is more representative of the time pattern in which the use benefit is derived from the
leased property. Revenue is recognized on a contractual basis for leases with escalations tied to a consumer price index with
no floor. Renewal options in leases with rental terms that are lower than those in the primary term are excluded from the
calculation of straight-line rent if the renewals are not reasonably assured. If the Company funds tenant improvements and
the improvements are deemed to be owned by the Company, revenue recognition will commence when the improvements
are substantially completed and possession or control of the space is turned over to the tenant. If the Company determines
that the tenant allowances are lease incentives, the Company commences revenue recognition when possession or control
of the space is turned over to the tenant for tenant work to begin. The lease incentive is recorded as a deferred expense and
amortized as a reduction of revenue on a straight-line basis over the respective lease term. The Company recognizes lease
termination fees as rental revenue in the period received and writes off unamortized lease-related intangible and other lease-
related account balances, provided there are no further Company obligations under the lease. Otherwise, such fees and
balances are recognized on a straight-line basis over the remaining obligation period with the termination payments being
recorded as a component of rent receivable-deferred on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Acquisition of Real Estate. The fair value of the real estate acquired, which includes the impact of fair value adjustments
for assumed mortgage debt related to property acquisitions, is allocated to the acquired tangible assets, consisting of land,
building and improvements and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and
below-market leases, other value of in-place leases and value of tenant relationships, based in each case on their fair values.
Prior to January 1, 2018, acquisition and pursuit costs were expensed as incurred and were included in property operating
expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations, which were $2,171 and $836 for 2017 and 2016,
respectively. Effective January 1, 2018, the Company's acquisitions are primarily considered asset acquisitions and
acquisition costs are now capitalized.

The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property (which includes land, building and improvements and fixtures
and equipment) is determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant. The “as-if-vacant” value is then allocated to land
and building and improvements based on management's determination of relative fair values of these assets. Factors
considered by management in performing these analyses include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-
up periods considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs,
management includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rental revenue during
the expected lease-up periods based on current market demand. Management also estimates costs to execute similar leases
including leasing commissions. Management generally retains a third party to assist in the allocations.

In allocating the fair value of the identified intangible assets and liabilities of an acquired property, above-market and below-
market lease values are recorded based on the difference between the current in-place lease rent and management's estimate
of current market rents. Below-market lease intangibles are recorded as part of deferred revenue and amortized into rental
revenue over the non-cancelable periods and bargain renewal periods of the respective leases. Above-market leases are
recorded as part of intangible assets and amortized as a direct charge against rental revenue over the non-cancelable portion
of the respective leases.

The aggregate value of other acquired intangible assets, consisting of in-place leases and tenant relationship values, is
measured by the excess of (1) the purchase price paid for a property over (2) the estimated fair value of the property as if
vacant, determined as set forth above. This aggregate value is allocated between in-place lease values and tenant relationship
values based on management's evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant's lease. The value of in-place leases
is amortized to expense over the remaining non-cancelable periods and any bargain renewal periods of the respective leases.
The value of tenant relationships is amortized to expense over the applicable lease term plus expected renewal periods.

Depreciation is determined by the straight-line method over the remaining estimated economic useful lives of the properties.
The Company generally depreciates its real estate assets over periods ranging up to 40 years.

Impairment of Real Estate. The Company evaluates the carrying value of all tangible and intangible real estate assets held
for investment for possible impairment when an event or change in circumstance has occurred that indicates its carrying
value may not be recoverable. The evaluation includes estimating and reviewing anticipated future undiscounted cash flows
to be derived from the asset. If such cash flows are less than the asset's carrying value, an impairment charge is recognized
to the extent by which the asset's carrying value exceeds its estimated fair value, which may be below the balance of any
non-recourse financing. Estimating future cash flows and fair values is highly subjective and such estimates could differ
materially from actual results.

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
($000, except share/unit data)

Investments in Non-Consolidated Entities. The Company accounts for its investments in 50% or less owned entities under
the equity method, unless consolidation is required. If the Company's investment in the entity is insignificant and the
Company has no influence over the control of the entity then the entity is accounted for under the cost method.

Impairment of Equity Method Investments. The Company assesses whether there are indicators that the value of its equity
method investments may be impaired. An impairment charge is recognized only if the Company determines that a decline
in the value of the investment below its carrying value is other-than-temporary. The assessment of impairment is highly
subjective and involves the application of significant assumptions and judgments about the Company's intent and ability to
recover its investment given the nature and operations of the underlying investment, including the level of the Company's
involvement therein, among other factors. To the extent an impairment is deemed to be other-than-temporary, the loss is
measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the investment over the estimated fair value of the investment.

Acquisition, Development and Construction Arrangements. The Company evaluates loans receivable where the Company
participates in residual profits through loan provisions or other contracts to ascertain whether the Company has the same
risks and rewards as an owner or a joint venture partner. Where the Company concludes that such arrangements are more
appropriately treated as an investment in real estate, the Company reflects such loan receivable as an equity investment in
real estate under construction in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. In these cases, no interest income is recorded on the loan
receivable and the Company records capitalized interest during the construction period. In arrangements where the Company
engages a developer to construct a property or provide funds to a tenant to develop a property, the Company will capitalize
the funds provided to the developer/tenant and internal costs of interest and real estate taxes, if applicable, during the
construction period.

Properties Held For Sale. Assets and liabilities of properties that meet various held for sale criteria, including whether it is
probable that a sale will occur within 12 months, are presented separately in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The operating
results of these properties are reflected as discontinued operations in the Consolidated Statements of Operations only if the
sale of these assets represents a strategic shift in operations; if not, the operating results are included in continuing operations.
Properties classified as held for sale are carried at the lower of net carrying value or estimated fair value less costs to sell
and depreciation and amortization are no longer recognized. Properties that do not meet the held for sale criteria are accounted
for as operating properties.

Deferred Expenses. Deferred expenses consist primarily of revolving line of credit debt and leasing costs. Debt costs are
amortized using the straight-line method, which approximates the interest method, over the terms of the debt instruments
and leasing costs are amortized over the term of the related lease.

Derivative Financial Instruments. The Company accounts for its interest rate swap agreements in accordance with FASB
ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging ("Topic 815"). In accordance with Topic 815, these agreements are carried on
the balance sheet at their respective fair values, as an asset if fair value is positive, or as a liability if fair value is negative.
If the interest rate swap is designated as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the interest rate swap's change in fair
value is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss); the ineffective portion, if any, is recognized in
earnings as an increase or decrease to interest expense.

Upon entering into hedging transactions, the Company documents the relationship between the interest rate swap agreement
and the hedged item. The Company also documents its risk-management policies, including objectives and strategies, as
they relate to its hedging activities. The Company assesses, both at inception of a hedge and on an ongoing basis, whether
or not the hedge is highly effective. The Company will discontinue hedge accounting on a prospective basis with changes
in the estimated fair value reflected in earnings when (1) it is determined that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting
cash flows of a hedged item (including forecasted transactions), (2) it is no longer probable that the forecasted transaction
will occur or (3) it is determined that designating the derivative as an interest rate swap is no longer appropriate. The
Company does and may continue to utilize interest rate swap and cap agreements to manage interest rate risk, but does not
anticipate entering into derivative transactions for speculative trading purposes.

Stock Compensation. The Company maintains an equity participation plan. Non-vested share grants generally vest either
based upon (1) time, (2) performance and/or (3) market conditions. Options granted under the plan in 2010 vested over a
five-year period and expire ten years from the date of grant. Options granted under the plan in 2008 vested upon attainment
of certain market performance measures and expired ten years from the date of grant. All share-based payments to employees,
including grants of employee stock options, are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations based on their
fair values. The Company has made an accounting policy election to account for share-based award forfeitures in
compensation costs when they occur.

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
($000, except share/unit data)

Tax Status. The Company has made an election to qualify, and believes it is operating so as to qualify, as a REIT for federal
income tax purposes. Accordingly, the Company generally will not be subject to federal income tax, provided that
distributions to its shareholders equal at least the amount of its REIT taxable income as defined under Sections 856 through
860 of the Code.

The Company is permitted to participate in certain activities from which it was previously precluded in order to maintain
its qualification as a REIT, so long as these activities are conducted in entities which elect to be treated as taxable REIT
subsidiaries under the Code. As such, the Company is subject to federal and state income taxes on the income from these
activities.

Income taxes, primarily related to the Company's taxable REIT subsidiaries, are accounted for under the asset and liability
method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated future tax consequences attributable to differences
between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis and operating
loss and tax credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates in effect for the
year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

Cash and Cash Equivalents. The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with maturities of three months or less
from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.

Restricted Cash. Restricted cash is comprised primarily of cash balances held in escrow by lenders.

Environmental Matters. Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations,
an owner of real property may be liable for the costs of removal or remediation of certain hazardous or toxic substances at,
on, in or under such property as well as certain other potential costs relating to hazardous or toxic substances. These liabilities
may include government fines, penalties and damages for injuries to persons and adjacent property. Such laws often impose
liability without regard to whether the owner knew of, or was responsible for, the presence or disposal of such substances.
Although most of the tenants of properties in which the Company has an interest are primarily responsible for any
environmental damage and claims related to the leased premises, in the event of the bankruptcy or inability of the tenant
of such premises to satisfy any obligations with respect to such environmental liability, or if the tenant is not responsible,
the Company's property owner subsidiary may be required to satisfy any such obligations, should they exist. In addition,
the property owner subsidiary, as the owner of such a property, may be held directly liable for any such damages or claims
irrespective of the provisions of any lease. As of December 31, 2018, the Company was not aware of any environmental
matter relating to any of its investments that would have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

Segment Reporting. The Company operates generally in one industry segment, single-tenant real estate assets.

Reclassifications. Certain amounts included in prior years' financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the
current year's presentation.

New Accounting Standards Adopted in 2018. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows
(Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which addresses how certain cash receipts and
cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18,
Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash, which clarifies guidance on the classification and presentation of
changes in restricted cash. Restricted cash balances are now included along with cash and cash equivalents as of the end of
the period and beginning of period, respectively, in the Company's consolidated statement of cash flows for all periods
presented. In addition, separate line items showing changes in restricted cash balances are now eliminated from the
Company's consolidated statement of cash flows. These ASUs were effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2017, including interim periods within those years. Entities must apply the guidance retrospectively to all periods presented
but may apply it prospectively if retrospective application would be impracticable. The Company adopted these ASUs
effective January 1, 2018 on a retrospective basis. The effect of the adoption resulted in (1) a $109 and $4,537 change in
cash flows from operating activities for 2017 and 2016, respectively, (2) a $(23,958) and $21,571 change in cash flows
from investing activities for 2017 and 2016, respectively, and (3) a $(2,899) and $(5,603) change in cash flows from financing
activities for 2017 and 2016, respectively.

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
($000, except share/unit data)

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business,
which clarifies the definition of a business when evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions
(or disposals) of assets or businesses. The ASU was effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The
Company expects that acquisitions of real estate or in-substance real estate will not meet the revised definition of a business
and thus will be treated as asset acquisitions. Acquisition costs for those acquisitions that are not businesses will be capitalized
rather than expensed. The Company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2018 on a prospective basis. The Company's
property acquisitions in 2018 were accounted for as asset acquisitions. The Company's adoption of this guidance did not
have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), as subsequently
amended, which amends the guidance for revenue recognition to eliminate the industry-specific revenue recognition guidance
and replace it with a principle based approach for determining revenue recognition. The new guidance was effective for
reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company’s revenue-producing contracts are primarily leases
that are not within the scope of this standard as leases are excluded from ASU 2014-09. Under ASU 2014-09, revenue
recognition for real estate sales is largely based on the transfer of control and the buyer having the ability to direct the use
of, or obtain substantially all of the remaining benefit from, the asset (which generally will occur on the closing date); the
factor of continuing involvement is no longer a specific consideration for the timing of recognition. The Company adopted
ASU 2014-09 effective January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective approach. As the majority of the Company’s
revenue is from rental income related to leases, the adoption of the ASU did not have a material impact on its consolidated
financial statements.

In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-05, Other Income - Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial
Assets (Topic 610-20), which requires that all entities account for the derecognition of a business in accordance with ASC
810, including instances in which the business is considered in-substance real estate. The ASU requires the Company to
measure at fair value any retained interest in a partial sale of real estate. The Company adopted ASU 2017-05 effective
January 1, 2018 using the modified retrospective approach, however there was no impact to prior balances as there were
no open contracts at the date of adoption. During 2018, the Company entered into a transaction in which it contributed
consolidated properties to a newly-formed joint venture and acquired a 20% interest in the joint venture. See note 7.

Recently Issued Accounting Guidance. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which requires
lessees to recognize a right of use asset and related lease liability for those leases classified as operating leases at the
commencement date that have lease terms of more than 12 months and amends certain lessor guidance. The Company
expects the ASU to result in the recognition of a right-of-use asset and related liability to primarily account for the Company's
future obligations under its ground lease arrangements for which the Company is the lessee. The Company estimates that
its initial right-of-use asset and lease liability will be within a range of $35,000 to $45,000 at adoption.

From a lessor perspective, the Company expects that lease components will primarily be recognized on a straight-line basis
over the lease term. ASU 2016-02 originally stated that companies would be required to bifurcate certain lease revenues
between lease and non-lease components; however, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842): Targeted
Improvements in July 2018, which allows lessors a practical expedient by class of underlying assets to account for lease
and non-lease components as a single lease component if certain criteria are met. Additionally, ASU 2016-02 requires that
the Company capitalize, as initial direct costs, only those costs that are incurred due to the execution of a lease. Historically,
the Company has capitalized lease commissions and "other" lease related costs, primarily legal expenses. Effective January
1, 2019, the Company will not capitalize these "other" costs, however, the Company does not believe these will be material.

ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those years. ASU
2016-02 originally required a modified retrospective method of adoption; however, under ASU 2018-11 companies may
elect to recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. The
Company will adopt this new guidance on January 1, 2019 utilizing the cumulative-effect adjustment outlined in ASU
2018-11. In addition, the Company will elect several practical expedients afforded to it at implementation.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU-2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to
Accounting for Hedging Activities, which amends the hedge accounting recognition and presentation requirements in Topic
815. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2019 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated
financial statements.

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
($000, except share/unit data)

(3)

Earnings Per Share

A significant portion of the Company's non-vested share-based payment awards are considered participating securities and
as such, the Company is required to use the two-class method for the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share.
Under the two-class computation method, net losses are not allocated to participating securities unless the holder of the
security has a contractual obligation to share in the losses. The non-vested share-based payment awards are not allocated
losses as the awards do not have a contractual obligation to share in losses of the Company.

The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations
for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2018:

2018

2017

2016

BASIC

Net income attributable to common shareholders

220,838

79,067

89,109

Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding

236,666,375

237,758,408

233,633,058

Net income attributable to common shareholders - per common

share basic

DILUTED:

Net income attributable to common shareholders - basic

Impact of assumed conversions

Net income attributable to common shareholders

0.93

0.33

0.38

220,838

2,528

223,366

79,067

147

79,214

89,109
(159)
88,950

Weighted-average common shares outstanding - basic

236,666,375

237,758,408

233,633,058

Effect of dilutive securities:

Unvested share-based payment awards and options

Operating Partnership Units

528,495

86,285

230,352

3,616,120

3,693,144

3,815,621

Weighted-average common shares outstanding - diluted

240,810,990

241,537,837

237,679,031

Net income attributable to common shareholders - per common share

diluted

0.93

0.33

0.37

For per common share amounts, all incremental shares are considered anti-dilutive for periods that have a loss from continuing
operations attributable to common shareholders. In addition, other common share equivalents may be anti-dilutive in certain
periods.

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
($000, except share/unit data)

(4)

Investments in Real Estate

The Company's real estate, net, consists of the following at December 31, 2018 and 2017:

Real estate, at cost:

Buildings and building improvements
Land, land estates and land improvements
Fixtures and equipment
Construction in progress

Real estate intangibles:
In-place lease values
Tenant relationships
Above-market leases

Accumulated depreciation and amortization(1)
Real estate, net

2018

2017

2,746,446
341,848
—
1,840

331,607
54,662
33,343
3,509,746
(954,087)
2,555,659

3,476,022
456,134
84
4,219

461,624
97,223
40,244
4,535,550
(1,225,650)
3,309,900

(1)

Includes accumulated amortization of real estate intangible assets of $231,443 and $334,681 in 2018 and 2017, respectively. The estimated
amortization of the above real estate intangible assets for the next five years is $24,021 in 2019, $21,442 in 2020, $19,501 in 2021, $17,448 in 2022
and $17,065 in 2023.

The Company had below-market leases, net of accumulated accretion, which are included in deferred revenue, of $17,923
and $23,308, respectively, as of December 31, 2018 and 2017. The estimated accretion for the next five years is $2,144 in
2019, $2,118 in 2020, $1,778 in 2021, $1,499 in 2022 and $1,499 in 2023.

The Company completed the following acquisitions and build-to-suit transactions during 2018 and 2017:

2018:

Property
Type
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial

Location

Acquisition
Date
Olive Branch, MS April 2018
Olive Branch, MS April 2018
June 2018
Edwardsville, IL
August 2018
Spartanburg, SC
August 2018
Pasadena, TX
September 2018
Carrollton, TX
November 2018
Goodyear, AZ
December 2018
Chester, VA

Initial
Cost
Basis
$ 44,090
48,575
44,178
27,632
23,868
19,564
41,372
66,311
$315,590

Lease
Expiration
07/2029
06/2021
05/2030
07/2024
08/2023
12/2033
04/2026
06/2030

Land and
Land
Estate

1,958
2,500
3,649
1,447
4,057
3,228
5,247
8,544
$ 30,630

Building and
Improvements
38,687
$
42,538
41,292
23,744
17,810
15,766
36,115
53,067
269,019

Real Estate Intangibles
Below
Market
Lease
Intangible
—
$
(1,614)
(4,230)
—
—
(677)
(2,004)
(2,132)
(10,657)

Lease in-
place Value
Intangible
3,445
$
5,151
3,467
2,441
2,001
1,247
2,014
6,832
26,598

Weighted-average life of intangible assets (years)

8.4

9.4

In addition, the Company acquired a 57-acre parcel of land from a non-consolidated joint venture and leased the parcel to
a tenant to develop an industrial property.

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
($000, except share/unit data)

2017:

Property
Type

Location

Acquisition
Date

Office
Industrial
Industrial
Office
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial McDonough, GA
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial
Industrial Warren, MI
Industrial Winchester, VA

Lake Jackson, TX(1) January 2017
February 2017
New Century, KS
February 2017
Lebanon, IN
Charlotte, NC(2)
April 2017
Cleveland, TN
May 2017
Grand Prairie, TX June 2017
June 2017
San Antonio, TX
July 2017
Opelika, AL
August 2017
September 2017
September 2017
September 2017
October 2017
November 2017
November 2017
December 2017

Byhalia, MS
Jackson, TN
Smyrna, TN
Lafayette, IN
Romulus, MI

Initial
Cost
Basis

$ 70,401
12,056
36,194
61,339
34,400
24,317
45,507
37,269
66,700
36,590
57,920
104,890
17,450
38,893
46,955
36,700
$727,581

Lease
Expiration

10/2036
01/2027
01/2024
04/2032
03/2024
03/2037
04/2027
05/2042
01/2028
09/2027
10/2027
04/2027
09/2024
08/2032
10/2032
12/2031

Land and
Land
Estate

3,078
—
2,100
3,771
1,871
3,166
1,311
134
5,441
1,751
1,454
1,793
662
2,438
972
1,988
$ 31,930

Real Estate Intangibles
Below
Market
Lease
Intangible

Lease in-
place Value
Intangible

Building and
Improvements

67,323
13,198
29,443
47,064
29,743
17,985
36,644
33,183
52,762
31,236
49,026
93,940
15,578
33,786
42,521
32,501
625,933

— $

1,648
4,651
10,504
2,786
3,166
7,552
3,952
8,497
3,603
7,440
9,157
1,210
2,669
3,462
2,211
72,508

—
(2,790)
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
—
(2,790)

Weighted-average life of intangible assets (years)

12.2

14.9

(1) Completed the construction of the final building of a four-building project. Initial cost basis excludes developer partner payout of $7,951.

(2) Sold to newly-formed joint venture in 2018. See note 7.

From time to time, the Company is engaged in various forms of build-to-suit development activities. As of December 31,
2018 and 2017, the Company had no development arrangements outstanding. During 2017, the Company recognized $3,922
in non-operating income on the Company's Consolidated Statement of Operations due to the write-off of contingent
consideration relating to a 2015 build-to-suit project that was not required to be paid by the Company.

(5)

Dispositions and Impairment

For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, the Company disposed of its interests in certain properties generating
aggregate net proceeds of $898,514, $223,853 and $370,038, respectively, which resulted in gains on sales of $252,913,
$63,428 and $81,510, respectively, including, in 2018, the disposition of 21 office assets to a newly-formed joint venture,
NNN Office JV L.P. (“NNN JV”), with an unaffiliated third-party. See note 7. For the years ended December 31, 2018,
2017 and 2016, the Company recognized net debt satisfaction gains (charges) relating to properties sold of $(1,698), $5,938
and $(532), respectively. The Company had two properties classified as held for sale at December 31, 2018 and one property
classified as held for sale at December 31, 2017.

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
($000, except share/unit data)

Assets and liabilities of held for sale properties as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 consisted of the following:

Assets:

Real estate, at cost

Real estate, intangible assets

Accumulated depreciation and amortization

Rent receivable - deferred

Other

Liabilities:

Other

December 31, 2018

December 31, 2017

63,639

2,827

14,498
(16,873)
2,439

165

63,868

386

—

2,827

—

The Company assesses on a regular basis whether there are any indicators that the carrying value of real estate assets may
be impaired. Potential indicators may include an increase in vacancy at a property, tenant financial instability, change in
the estimated holding period of an asset and the potential sale of the property in the near future. An asset is determined to
be impaired if the asset's carrying value is in excess of its estimated fair value and the Company estimates that its cost will
not be recovered. During 2018, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized aggregate impairment charges on real estate
properties of $95,813, $39,702 and $100,195, respectively. During 2018, $36,620 of the impairment charges of $95,813
were recognized on properties owned at December 31, 2018. The Company's office assets in Overland Park, Kansas and
Kansas City, Missouri incurred an aggregate $23,496 of impairment charges due to a reduction in the anticipated holding
period and leasing prospects. During 2017, $18,023 of the impairment charges of $39,702 were recognized on properties
held at December 31, 2017. The Company's office asset in Florence, South Carolina and industrial asset in Memphis,
Tennessee incurred an aggregate $15,008 of the impairment charges due to a reduction in anticipating holding period. The
2016 impairment charges include an aggregate impairment charge of $65,500 recognized on the sale of three land investments
in New York, New York.

In February 2017, the Company recognized a $5,294 loan loss on the assignment of a loan receivable secured by a hospital
in Kennewick, Washington.

(6)

Fair Value Measurements

The following tables present the Company's assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and non-recurring
basis as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, aggregated by the level in the fair value hierarchy within which those measurements
fall:

Description

2018

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

Fair Value Measurements Using

Interest rate swap assets

Impaired real estate assets*

Description

Interest rate swap assets
Impaired real estate assets*

$
$

35,036

— $

—

35,036

Fair Value Measurements Using

2017

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

(Level 3)

1,065
7,829

$
$

— $
— $

1,065

$
— $

—
7,829

*Represents a non-recurring fair value measurement. Fair value as of the date of impairment.

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
($000, except share/unit data)

The table below sets forth the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments as of
December 31, 2018 and 2017:

Liabilities
Debt

As of December 31, 2018

As of December 31, 2017

Carrying
Amount

Fair Value

Carrying
Amount

Fair Value

$ 1,492,483

$ 1,409,773

$ 2,068,867

$ 2,013,226

The majority of the inputs used to value the Company's interest rate swaps fall within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy,
such as observable market interest rate curves; however, the credit valuation associated with the interest rate swaps utilizes
Level 3 inputs, such as estimates of current credit spreads to evaluate the likelihood of default by the Company and its
counterparties. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the Company determined that the credit valuation adjustment relative
to the overall interest rate swaps was not significant. As a result, all interest rate swaps have been classified in Level 2 of
the fair value hierarchy.

The Company estimates the fair value of its real estate assets, including non-consolidated real estate assets, by using income
and market valuation techniques. The Company may estimate fair values using market information such as recent sale offers
or discounted cash flow models, which primarily rely on Level 3 inputs. The cash flow models include estimated cash
inflows and outflows over a specified holding period. These cash flows may include contractual rental revenues, projected
future rental revenues and expenses and forecasted tenant improvements and lease commissions based upon market
conditions determined through discussion with local real estate professionals, experience the Company has with its other
owned properties in such markets and expectations for growth. Capitalization rates and discount rates utilized in these
models are estimated by management based upon rates that management believes to be within a reasonable range of current
market rates for the respective properties based upon an analysis of factors such as property and tenant quality, geographical
location and local supply and demand observations. To the extent the Company under-estimates forecasted cash outflows
(tenant improvements, lease commissions and operating costs) or over-estimates forecasted cash inflows (rental revenue
rates), the estimated fair value of its real estate assets could be overstated.

The fair value of the Company's debt is primarily estimated utilizing Level 3 inputs by using a discounted cash flow analysis,
based upon estimates of market interest rates. The Company determines the fair value of its Senior Notes using market
prices. The inputs used in determining the fair value of these notes are categorized as Level 1 due to the fact that the Company
uses quoted market rates to value these instruments. However, the inputs used in determining the fair value could be
categorized as Level 2 if trading volumes are low.

Fair values cannot be determined with precision, may not be substantiated by comparison to quoted prices in active markets
and may not be realized upon sale. Additionally, there are inherent uncertainties in any fair value measurement technique,
and changes in the underlying assumptions used, including discount rates, liquidity risks and estimates of future cash flows,
could significantly affect the fair value measurement amounts.

Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable. The Company estimates that the fair value
of cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates carrying value due to the
relatively short maturity of the instruments.

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
($000, except share/unit data)

(7)

Investment in and Advances to Non-Consolidated Entities

Below is a schedule of the Company's investments in and advances to non-consolidated entities:

Investment
NNN JV

Etna Park 70 LLC

Other

Percentage Ownership at

Investment Balance as of

December 31, 2018

December 31, 2017

(1)

(2)

(3)

20%

90%

15% to 25%

53,144

4,774

8,265

66,183

—

5,831

11,645

17,476

(1) During 2018, the Company disposed of 21 office assets to NNN JV for an aggregate gross disposition price of $725,800 and acquired a 20% interest
in NNN JV. Two of the 21 properties, with a combined estimated fair value of $45,653, were contributed to NNN JV along with cash of $8,053. The
Company recognized a gain of $14,645 in connection with the contribution of the two office assets to NNN JV, and in addition, NNN JV assumed
an aggregate of $103,400 of non-recourse mortgage debt in the transaction. NNN JV obtained an aggregate of $362,800 of non-recourse mortgage
financing which bears interest at LIBOR plus 200 basis points and has an initial term of three years but can be extended for two additional terms of
one-year each. There is a rate increase of 15 basis points upon each extension. NNN JV entered into interest rate agreements which cap the LIBOR
component of the $362,800 mortgage financing at 4.0% for two years. As of December 31, 2018, NNN JV had total assets of $757,811 and total
liabilities of $492,091. The properties are encumbered by an aggregate of $466,200 of non-recourse mortgage debt.

(2)

Joint venture formed in 2017 with a developer entity to acquire a 151-acre parcel of developable land and pursue industrial build-to-suit opportunities.
The developer entity has substantive participation rights. In December 2018, the parcel was subdivided and the Company received a distribution of
an ownership interest in a 57-acre parcel with a historical cost of $3,008. The Company acquired control of the parcel via the purchase of the
Company's joint venture partners' interest.

(3) At December 31, 2018, represents two joint venture investments, which own single-tenant, net-leased assets. During 2017, the Company received

$49,085 in full satisfaction of a construction financing arrangement that the Company previously provided to one of the joint ventures.

In December 2018, the Company received $4,312 from a non-consolidated investment in connection with its sale of a six-
property office portfolio. In February 2017, the Company sold its 40% tenant-in-common interest in its Oklahoma City,
Oklahoma office property for $6,198. In January 2016, the Company received $6,681 in connection with the sale of a non-
consolidated office property in Russellville, Arkansas. The Company recognized gains of $1,777, $1,452 and $5,378,
respectively, in connection with these sales, which are included in equity in earnings of non-consolidated entities.

During 2017, the Company recognized an impairment charge of $3,512 on its investment in a retail property in Palm Beach
Gardens, Florida due to the bankruptcy of its tenant. This impairment charge reduced the Company's investment balance
to zero. During 2018, the property was sold in a foreclosure sale.

LRA earns advisory fees from certain of these non-consolidated entities for services related to acquisitions, asset management
and debt placement. Advisory fees earned from these non-consolidated investments were $1,443, $807 and $693 for the
years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016.

(8)

Mortgages and Notes Payable

The Company had the following mortgages and notes payable outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017:

Mortgages and notes payable
Unamortized debt issuance costs

December 31, 2018

December 31, 2017

575,514
(5,094)
570,420

697,068
(7,258)
689,810

Interest rates, including imputed rates on mortgages and notes payable, ranged from 2.2% to 6.5% at December 31, 2018
and the mortgages and notes payable mature between 2019 and 2036. Interest rates, including imputed rates, ranged from
2.2% to 7.8% at December 31, 2017. The weighted-average interest rate at December 31, 2018 and 2017 was approximately
4.5% and 4.6%, respectively.

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
($000, except share/unit data)

The Company has an unsecured credit agreement with KeyBank National Association, as agent. A summary of the significant
terms, as of December 31, 2018, are as follows:

$505,000 Revolving Credit Facility(1)
$300,000 Term Loan(2)(3)

Maturity Date

August 2019

January 2021

Interest Rate

LIBOR + 1.00%

LIBOR + 1.10%

(1) Maturity date can be extended to August 2020 at the Company's option. The interest rate ranges from LIBOR plus 0.85% to 1.55%. At December 31,
2018, the revolving credit facility had no borrowings outstanding and availability of $505,000, subject to covenant compliance. See note 20.

(2) The interest rate ranges from LIBOR plus 0.90% to 1.75%. The Company had aggregate interest-rate swap agreements to fix the LIBOR component
at a weighted-average rate of 1.42% through January 2019 on $255,000 of the $300,000 outstanding LIBOR-based borrowings. During 2018, the
Company satisfied in full the $300,000 term loan due in 2020.

(3) The aggregate unamortized debt issuance costs for the term loan was $1,267 and $1,804 as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

The unsecured revolving credit facility and the unsecured term loan are subject to financial covenants, which the Company
was in compliance with at December 31, 2018.

Mortgages payable and secured loans are generally collateralized by real estate and the related leases. Certain mortgages
payable have yield maintenance or defeasance requirements relating to any prepayments.

Scheduled principal and balloon payments for mortgages, notes payable and term loan for the next five years and thereafter
are as follows:

Year ending
December 31,
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Thereafter

Unamortized debt issuance costs

Total

101,887
55,143
340,465
22,120
23,998
331,901
875,514
(6,361)
869,153

Included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, the Company recognized debt satisfaction gains (charges), net, of
$(898), $258 and $(7) for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively, due to the satisfaction of
mortgages and notes payable other than those disclosed elsewhere in these financial statements. In addition, the Company
capitalized $15, $1,174 and $4,933 in interest for the years ended 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
($000, except share/unit data)

(9)

Senior Notes, Convertible Notes and Trust Preferred Securities

The Company had the following Senior Notes outstanding as of December 31, 2018 and 2017:

Issue Date

May 2014

June 2013

Unamortized debt discount

Unamortized debt issuance cost

December 31, 2018

December 31, 2017

250,000

500,000

(1,235)

(2,731)

496,034

250,000

500,000

(1,507)

(3,295)

495,198

Interest
Rate

Maturity
Date

Issue
Price

4.40% June 2024

99.883%

4.25% June 2023

99.026%

Each series of the Senior Notes is unsecured and pays interest semi-annually in arrears. The Company may redeem the
notes at its option at any time prior to maturity in whole or in part by paying the principal amount of the notes being
redeemed plus a premium.

During 2010, the Company issued $115,000 aggregate principal amount of 6.00% Convertible Guaranteed Notes. The
notes paid interest semi-annually in arrears and were scheduled to mature in January 2030. The notes were fully satisfied/
converted in 2016. During 2016, $12,400 aggregate principal amount of the notes were converted for 1,892,269 common
shares and an aggregate cash payment of $672 plus accrued and unpaid interest. The Company recognized aggregate debt
satisfaction charges of $436 during 2016 relating to the conversions.

During 2007, the Company issued $200,000 original principal amount of Trust Preferred Securities. The Trust Preferred
Securities, which are classified as debt, are due in 2037, are open for redemption at the Company's option, bore interest
at a fixed rate of 6.804% through April 2017 and thereafter bear interest at a variable rate of three month LIBOR plus
170 basis points through maturity. The interest rate at December 31, 2018 was 4.220%. As of December 31, 2018 and
2017, there was $129,120 original principal amount of Trust Preferred Securities outstanding and $1,824 and $1,924,
respectively, of unamortized debt issuance costs.

Scheduled principal payments for these debt instruments for the next five years and thereafter are as follows:

Year ending December 31,

Total

2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Thereafter

Unamortized debt discounts
Unamortized debt issuance costs

—
—
—
—
250,000
379,120
629,120
(1,235)
(4,555)
623,330

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
($000, except share/unit data)

(10)

Derivatives and Hedging Activities

Risk Management Objective of Using Derivatives. The Company is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business
operations and economic conditions. The Company principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and
operational risks through management of its core business activities. The Company manages economic risks, including
interest rate, liquidity, and credit risk primarily by managing the type, amount, sources, and duration of its debt funding and
the use of derivative financial instruments. Specifically, the Company enters into derivative financial instruments to manage
exposures that arise from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts,
the value of which are determined by interest rates. The Company's derivative financial instruments are used to manage
differences in the amount, timing, and duration of the Company's known or expected cash receipts and its known or expected
cash payments principally related to the Company's investments and borrowings.

Cash Flow Hedges of Interest Rate Risk. The Company's objectives in using interest rate derivatives are to add stability to
interest expense, to manage its exposure to interest rate movements and therefore manage its cash outflows as it relates to
the underlying debt instruments. To accomplish these objectives the Company primarily uses interest rate swaps as part of
its interest rate risk management strategy relating to certain of its variable rate debt instruments. Interest rate swaps designated
as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of variable-rate amounts from a counterparty in exchange for the Company making
fixed-rate payments over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying notional amount.

The effective portion of changes in the fair value of derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges is recorded
in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and is subsequently reclassified into earnings in the period that the
hedged forecasted transaction affects earnings. The ineffective portion of the change in fair value of the derivatives is
recognized directly in earnings. The Company did not incur any ineffectiveness during 2018, 2017 and 2016.

The Company has designated the interest rate swap agreements with its counterparties as cash flow hedges of the risk of
variability attributable to changes in the LIBOR swap rates on $255,000 of LIBOR-indexed variable-rate unsecured term
loans. Accordingly, changes in the fair value of the swaps are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) and reclassified
to earnings as interest becomes receivable or payable.

Amounts reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest
expense as interest payments are made on the aggregate $255,000 term loans. During the next 12 months, the Company
estimates that an additional $76 will be reclassified as a decrease to interest expense if the swaps remain outstanding.

As of December 31, 2018, the Company had the following outstanding interest rate derivatives that were designated as cash
flow hedges of interest rate risk:

Interest Rate Derivative

Number of Instruments

Interest Rate Swaps

Notional

$255,000

The table below presents the fair value of the Company's derivative financial instruments as well as their classification on
the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.

Derivatives designated as hedging
instruments:
Interest Rate Swap Asset

As of December 31, 2018

As of December 31, 2017

Balance Sheet Location

Fair Value

Balance Sheet Location

Fair Value

Other Assets

1,065

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
($000, except share/unit data)

The tables below present the effect of the Company's derivative financial instruments on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations for 2018 and 2017:

Derivatives in Cash Flow

Amount of Income Recognized
in OCI on Derivative
(Effective Portion)
December 31,

Hedging Relationships

2018

2017

Location of Income
(Loss)
Reclassified from
Accumulated OCI
into Income
(Effective Portion)

Amount of (Income) Loss
Reclassified
from Accumulated OCI into
Income (Effective Portion)
December 31,

2018

2017

Interest Rate Swap

597

1,168

Interest expense

(1,586) $

930

The Company's agreements with the swap derivative counterparties contain provisions whereby if the Company defaults
on the underlying indebtedness, including default where repayment of the indebtedness has not been accelerated by the
lender, then the Company could also be declared in default of the swap derivative obligation. As of December 31, 2018,
the Company had not posted any collateral related to the agreements.

(11)

Leases

Lessor:

Minimum future rental receipts under the non-cancelable portion of tenant leases, assuming no new or re-negotiated leases,
for the next five years and thereafter are as follows:

Year ending
December 31,
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Thereafter

Total
270,557
253,660
233,192
212,893
211,387
1,619,848
$ 2,801,537

The above minimum lease payments do not include reimbursements to be received from tenants for certain operating
expenses and real estate taxes and do not include early termination payments provided for in certain leases.

Certain leases allow for the tenant to terminate the lease if the property is deemed obsolete, as defined, and upon payment
of a termination fee to the landlord, as stipulated in the lease. In addition, certain leases provide the tenant with the right to
purchase the leased property at fair market value or a stipulated price.

Lessee:

The Company holds, through property owner subsidiaries, leasehold interests in various properties. Generally, the ground
rents on these properties are either paid directly by the tenants to the fee holder or reimbursed to the Company as additional
rent. Certain properties are economically owned through the holding of industrial revenue bonds and as such neither ground
lease payments nor bond debt service payments are made or received, respectively. For certain of these properties, the
Company has an option to purchase the fee interest.

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
($000, except share/unit data)

Minimum future rental payments under non-cancelable leasehold interests, excluding leases held through industrial revenue
bonds and lease payments in the future that are based upon fair market value, for the next five years and thereafter are as
follows:

Year ending
December 31,
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
Thereafter

Total

3,826
3,827
3,769
3,834
4,008
28,326
47,590

Rent expense for the leasehold interests was $597, $690 and $987 in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The Company leases its corporate headquarters. The lease expires March 2026. The Company is responsible for its
proportionate share of operating expenses and real estate taxes above a base year. In addition, the Company leases office
space for its regional offices. The minimum lease payments for the Company's offices are $1,295 for 2019, $1,296 for 2020,
$1,325 for 2021, $1,335 for 2022 and $1,304 for 2023 and $2,935 thereafter. Rent expense for 2018, 2017 and 2016 was
$1,274, $1,256 and $1,242, respectively.

(12)

Concentration of Risk

The Company seeks to reduce its operating and leasing risks through the geographic diversification of its properties, tenant
industry diversification, avoidance of dependency on a single asset and the creditworthiness of its tenants. For the years
ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, no single tenant represented greater than 10% of rental revenues.

Cash and cash equivalent balances at certain institutions may exceed insurable amounts. The Company believes it mitigates
this risk by investing in or through major financial institutions.

(13)

Equity

Shareholders' Equity:

During 2016, the Company issued 577,823 common shares under its direct share purchase plan, which includes a dividend
reinvestment component, raising net proceeds of approximately $4,115. In 2018 and 2017, no shares were issued under this
plan. During 2013, the Company implemented, and in 2016, the Company updated, its At-The-Market offering program
under which the Company may issue up to $125,000 in common shares over the term of this program. During 2017 and
2016, the Company issued 1,593,603 and 976,109 common shares, respectively, under this program and generated aggregate
gross proceeds of $17,362 and $10,498, respectively. No shares were sold under this program in 2018. The proceeds from
these issuances were primarily used for general working capital, to fund investments and retire indebtedness.

The Company had 1,935,400 shares of Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock (“Series C Preferred”) outstanding
at December 31, 2018. The shares have a dividend of $3.25 per share per annum, have a liquidation preference of $96,770,
and the Company, if certain common share prices are achieved, can force conversion into common shares of the Company.
As of December 31, 2018, each share was convertible into 2.4339 common shares. This conversion ratio may increase over
time if the Company's common share dividend exceeds certain quarterly thresholds.

If certain fundamental changes occur, holders may require the Company, in certain circumstances, to repurchase all or part
of their shares of Series C Preferred. In addition, upon the occurrence of certain fundamental changes, the Company will,
under certain circumstances, increase the conversion rate by a number of additional common shares or, in lieu thereof, may
in certain circumstances elect to adjust the conversion rate upon the shares of Series C Preferred becoming convertible into
shares of the public acquiring or surviving company.

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
($000, except share/unit data)

The Company may, at the Company's option, cause shares of Series C Preferred to be automatically converted into that
number of common shares that are issuable at the then prevailing conversion rate. The Company may exercise its conversion
right only if, at certain times, the closing price of the Company's common shares equals or exceeds 125% of the then
prevailing conversion price of the Series C Preferred.

Investors in shares of Series C Preferred generally have no voting rights, but will have limited voting rights if the Company
fails to pay dividends for six or more quarters and under certain other circumstances. Upon conversion, the Company may
choose to deliver the conversion value to investors in cash, common shares, or a combination of cash and common shares.

During 2018, 2017 and 2016, the Company issued 965,932, 835,234 and 1,084,835 of its common shares, respectively, to
certain employees and trustees. Typically, trustee share grants vest immediately. Employee share grants generally vest
ratably, on anniversaries of the grant date, however, in certain situations vesting is cliff-based after a specific number of
years and/or subject to meeting certain performance criteria (see note 14).

In July 2015, the Company's Board of Trustees authorized the repurchase of up to 10,000,000 common shares and increased
this authorization by 10,000,000 common shares in 2018. This share repurchase program has no expiration date. During
2018 and 2016, the Company repurchased and retired 5,851,252 and 1,184,113, respectively, common shares at an average
price of $8.05 and $7.56, respectively, per common share under this share repurchase program. No shares were repurchased
in 2017. There were $2,641 of unsettled repurchases as of December 31, 2018.

A summary of the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) related to the Company's cash flow hedges
is as follows:

Balance at beginning of period

Other comprehensive income before reclassifications

Amounts of (income) loss reclassified from accumulated other

comprehensive income (loss) to interest expense

Balance at end of period

Noncontrolling Interests:

Twelve months ended December 31,

2018

2017

1,065

597

(1,586)
76

(1,033)
1,168

930

1,065

In conjunction with several of the Company's acquisitions in prior years, sellers were issued OP units as a form of
consideration. All OP units, other than OP units owned by the Company, are redeemable for common shares at certain times,
at the option of the holders, and are generally not otherwise mandatorily redeemable by the Company. The OP units are
classified as a component of permanent equity as the Company has determined that the OP units are not redeemable securities
as defined by GAAP. Each OP unit is currently redeemable for approximately 1.13 common shares, subject to future
adjustments.

During 2018, 2017 and 2016, 53,388, 140,746 and 48,549 common shares, respectively, were issued by the Company, in
connection with OP unit redemptions, for an aggregate value of $189, $584 and $210, respectively.

As of December 31, 2018, there were approximately 3,177,000 OP units outstanding other than OP units owned by the
Company. All OP units receive distributions in accordance with the LCIF partnership agreement. To the extent that the
Company's dividend per common share is less than the stated distribution per OP unit per the LCIF partnership agreement,
the distributions per OP unit are reduced by the percentage reduction in the Company's dividend per common share. No OP
units have a liquidation preference.

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
($000, except share/unit data)

The following discloses the effects of changes in the Company's ownership interests in its noncontrolling interests:

Net Income Attributable to Shareholders and
Transfers from Noncontrolling Interests

2018

2017

2016

Net income attributable to Lexington Realty Trust shareholders

227,415

85,583

95,624

Transfers from noncontrolling interests:

Increase in additional paid-in-capital for redemption of noncontrolling

OP units

189

584

210

Change from net income attributable to shareholders and transfers from

noncontrolling interests

227,604

86,167

95,834

(14)

Benefit Plans

The Company maintains an equity award plan pursuant to which qualified and non-qualified options may be issued. No
common share options were issued in 2018, 2017 and 2016. The Company granted 1,248,501, 1,265,500 and 2,000,000
common share options on December 31, 2010 (“2010 options”), January 8, 2010 (“2009 options”) and December 31, 2008
(“2008 options”), respectively, at an exercise price of $7.95, $6.39 and $5.60, respectively. The 2010 options (1) vested
20% annually on each December 31, 2011 through 2015 and (2) terminate on the earlier of (x) six months of termination
of service with the Company and (y) December 31, 2020. The 2009 options (1) vested 20% annually on each December
31, 2010 through 2014 and (2) terminate on the earlier of (x) six months of termination of service with the Company and
(y) December 31, 2019. The 2008 options (1) vested 50% following a 20-day trading period where the average closing price
of a common share of the Company on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) was $8.00 or higher and vested 50%
following a 20-day trading period where the average closing price of a common share of the Company on the NYSE was
$10.00 or higher, and (2) terminated on the earlier of (x) termination of service with the Company or (y) December 31,
2018. As a result of the share dividends paid in 2009, each of the 2008 options were exchangeable for approximately 1.13
common shares at an exercise price of $4.97 per common share.

The Company engaged third parties to value the options as of each option's respective grant date. The third parties determined
the value to be $2,422 and $2,771 for the 2010 options and 2009 options, respectively, using the Black-Scholes model and
$2,480 for the 2008 options using the Monte Carlo model. The options are considered equity awards as they are settled
through the issuance of common shares. As such, the options were valued as of the grant date and do not require subsequent
remeasurement. There were several assumptions used to fair value the options including the expected volatility in the
Company's common share price based upon the fluctuation in the Company's historical common share price. The more
significant assumptions underlying the determination of fair value for options granted were as follows:

Weighted-average fair value of options granted
Weighted-average risk-free interest rate
Weighted-average expected option lives (in years)
Weighted-average expected volatility
Weighted-average expected dividend yield

2010
Options

2009
Options

2008
Options

1.94
2.54%
6.50
49.00%
7.40%

2.19
3.29%
6.70
59.08%
6.26%

1.24
1.33%
3.60
59.94%
14.40%

The Company recognized compensation expense relating to these options over an average of 5.0 years for the 2010 options
and 2009 options and 3.6 years for the 2008 options. All deferred compensation costs relating to the outstanding options
were fully amortized by December 31, 2015. The intrinsic value of an option is the amount by which the market value of
the underlying common share at the date the option is exercised exceeds the exercise price of the option. The total intrinsic
value of options exercised for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 were $26 and $1,064, respectively.

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
($000, except share/unit data)

Share option activity during the years indicated is as follows:

Balance at December 31, 2016

Exercised

Balance at December 31, 2017

Exercised

Balance at December 31, 2018

Number of
Shares

Weighted-Average
Exercise Price
Per Share

406,241
(271,451)
134,790
(16,390)
118,400

6.78
6.48
7.39
6.99
7.44

As of December 31, 2018, the aggregate intrinsic value of options that were outstanding and exercisable was $91.

Non-vested share activity for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, is as follows:

Balance at December 31, 2016

Granted
Vested

Balance at December 31, 2017

Granted
Vested
Forfeited

Balance at December 31, 2018

Number of
Shares

Weighted-Average
Grant-Date Fair
Value Per Share

3,151,310
777,900
(161,912)
3,767,298
899,614
(618,383)
(593,452)
3,455,077

8.09
6.83
8.90
7.79
6.55
9.70
6.59
7.34

During 2018 and 2017, the Company granted common shares to certain employees and trustees as follows:

2018

2017

Performance Shares(1)
Shares issued:
Index - 1Q
Peer - 1Q
Index - 2Q
Peer - 2Q

Grant date fair value per share:(2)

Index - 1Q
Peer - 1Q
Index - 2Q
Peer - 2Q

Non-Vested Common Shares:(3)

Shares issued
Grant date fair value

331,025
331,019

$5.81
$5.37

237,570
$2,190

106,706
106,705
163,466
163,463

$6.82
$6.34
$4.05
$4.27

237,560
$2,551

(1) The shares vest based on the Company's total shareholder return growth after a three-year measurement period relative to an index and a group of
Company peers. Dividends will not be paid on these grants until earned. Once the performance criteria are met and the actual number of shares
earned is determined, such shares vest immediately. During 2018, 116,926 of the 642,029 performance shares issued in 2015 vested.

(2) The fair value of grants was determined at the grant date using a Monte Carlo simulation model.

(3) The shares vest ratably over a three-year service period.

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
($000, except share/unit data)

In addition, during 2018, 2017 and 2016, the Company issued 66,318, 57,334, and 50,816, respectively, of fully vested
common shares to non-management members of the Company's Board of Trustees with a fair value of $599, $596, and
$427, respectively.

As of December 31, 2018, of the remaining 3,455,077 non-vested shares, 1,495,608 are subject to time-based vesting and
1,959,469 are subject to performance-based vesting. At December 31, 2018, there are 4,012,870 awards available for grant.
The Company has $7,915 in unrecognized compensation costs relating to the non-vested shares that will be charged to
compensation expense over an average of approximately 2.1 years.

The Company has established a trust for certain officers in which vested common shares granted for the benefit of the
officers are deposited. The officers exert no control over the common shares in the trust and the common shares are available
to the general creditors of the Company. As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, there were 427,531 common shares in the
trust.

The Company sponsors a 401(k) retirement savings plan covering all eligible employees. The Company makes a discretionary
matching contribution on a portion of employee participant salaries and, based on its profitability, may make an additional
discretionary contribution at each fiscal year end to all eligible employees. These discretionary contributions are subject to
vesting under a schedule providing for 25% annual vesting starting with the first year of employment and 100% vesting
after four years of employment. Approximately $397, $439 and $357 of contributions are applicable to 2018, 2017 and
2016, respectively.

During 2018, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized $6,901, $8,333 and $8,415, respectively, in expense relating to
scheduled vesting and issuance of common share grants.

(15)

Related Party Transactions

The Company has an indemnity obligation to Vornado Realty Trust ("VNO"), one of its significant shareholders, with respect
to actions by the Company that affect Vornado Realty Trust's status as a REIT.

All related party transactions are approved by the independent members of the Company's Board of Trustees or the Audit
Committee as provided for in the Company's Code of Business Conduct and Ethics.

The Company leased a property to an entity in which VNO, a significant shareholder, has an interest. During 2017 and
2016, the Company recognized $234 and $236, respectively, in rental revenue from this property. This property was sold
in 2017. The Company leases its corporate office from an affiliate of Vornado Realty Trust. Rent expense for this property
was $1,192, $1,179 and $1,176 in 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

In connection with efforts, on a non-binding basis, to procure non-recourse mezzanine financing from an affiliate of the
Company's Chairman, pursuant to the terms of the EB-5 visa program administered by the United States Citizenship and
Immigration Services (“USCIS”), for a joint venture investment in Houston, Texas, in which the Company has an investment,
the Company executed a guaranty in favor of an affiliate of its Chairman. The guaranty provided that the Company will
reimburse investors providing the funds for such financing if the following occurs: (1) the joint venture receives such funds,
(2) the USCIS denies the financing solely because the project is not permitted under the EB-5 visa program, and (3) the
joint venture fails to return such funds. During 2017, USCIS approved the project, and the guaranty terminated by its terms.
In 2018, the joint venture obtained $8,500 of EB-5 mezzanine financing from an affiliate of the Company's Chairman. The
joint venture reimbursed the Chairman's affiliate $150 for its expenses. Under an indemnity agreement, the joint venture is
required to pay an affiliate of the Company's Chairman 0.625% of the outstanding principal amount of the EB-5 mezzanine
financing per annum.

In addition, during 2017, the Company obtained non-recourse mezzanine financing in the initial amount of $8,000 from an
affiliate of the Company's Chairman, pursuant to the terms of the EB-5 visa program administered by the USCIS, for an
investment in Charlotte, North Carolina. In January 2018, the Company obtained an additional $500 of financing proceeds.
The Company reimbursed the Chairman's affiliate approximately $105 for its expenses and paid a $128 structuring fee to
the Chairman's affiliate. The property was subsequently contributed to, and the financing assumed by, NNN JV.

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
($000, except share/unit data)

(16)

Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes relates primarily to the taxable income of the Company's taxable REIT subsidiaries. The
earnings, other than in taxable REIT subsidiaries, of the Company are not generally subject to federal income taxes at the
Company level due to the REIT election made by the Company.

Income taxes have been provided for on the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred income
taxes are recognized for the temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of assets and
liabilities.

The Company's provision for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016 is summarized as follows:

Current:
Federal
State and local
NOL utilized
Deferred:
Federal
State and local

2018

2017

2016

(60) $

(107) $

(1,668)
—

(1,810)
—

—
—
(1,728) $

—
—
(1,917) $

(140)
(1,299)
59

(44)
(15)
(1,439)

The income tax provision differs from the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to pre-tax
operating income as follows:

Federal provision at statutory tax rate (21% for 2018 and 34% for

2017 and 2016)

State and local taxes, net of federal benefit
Other

2018

2017

2016

(65) $
(11)
(1,652)
(1,728) $

(182) $
(40)
(1,695)
(1,917) $

(154)
(30)
(1,255)
(1,439)

For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, the “other” amount is comprised primarily of state franchise taxes
of $1,679, $1,598 and $1,252, respectively.

A summary of the average taxable nature of the Company's common dividends for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2018, is as follows:

Total dividends per share
Ordinary income
Qualifying dividend
Capital gain
Return of capital

2018

2017

2016

0.710
87.89%
0.14%
—
11.97%
100.00%

0.700
59.93%
0.15%
—
39.92%
100.00%

0.685
96.73%
0.22%
—
3.05%
100.00%

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
($000, except share/unit data)

A summary of the average taxable nature of the Company's dividend on shares of its Series C Preferred for each of the years
in the three-year period ended December 31, 2018, is as follows:

Total dividends per share
Ordinary income
Qualifying dividend
Capital gain
Return of capital

(17)

Commitments and Contingencies

2018

2017

2016

3.25
99.84%
0.16%
—
—
100.00%

3.25
99.75%
0.25%
—
—
100.00%

3.25
99.78%
0.22
—
—
100.00%

In addition to the commitments and contingencies disclosed elsewhere, the Company has the following commitments and
contingencies.

The Company is obligated under certain tenant leases, including its proportionate share for leases for non-consolidated
entities, to fund the expansion of the underlying leased properties. The Company, under certain circumstances, may guarantee
to tenants the completion of base building improvements and the payment of tenant improvement allowances and lease
commissions on behalf of its subsidiaries.

The Company and LCIF are parties to a funding agreement under which the Company may be required to fund distributions
made on account of LCIF's OP units. Pursuant to the funding agreement, the parties agreed that, if LCIF does not have
sufficient cash available to make a quarterly distribution to its limited partners in an amount in accordance with the partnership
agreement, Lexington will fund the shortfall. Payments under the agreement will be made in the form of loans to LCIF and
will bear interest at prevailing rates as determined by the Company in its discretion but, no less than the applicable federal
rate. LCIF's right to receive these loans will expire if no OP units remain outstanding and all such loans are repaid. No
amounts have been advanced under this agreement.

From time to time, the Company is directly or indirectly involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of
business. Management believes, based on currently available information, and after consultation with legal counsel, that
although the outcomes of those normal course proceedings are uncertain, the results of such proceedings, in the aggregate,
will not have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations.

Cummins Inc. v. Lexington Columbus (Jackson Street) L.P. and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (State of Indiana, County of
Bartholomew, in the Bartholomew Superior Court). On October 25, 2018, Cummins Inc., the tenant in the Company's
Columbus, Indiana office building, filed a complaint for declaratory relief against Lexington Columbus (Jackson Street)
L.P., the Company's property owner subsidiary, and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., the trustee for the noteholders with a security
interest in the office building. Under the subject lease, Cummins Inc.’s tenancy extends through July 31, 2024, with options
to further extend for additional time periods. Despite failing to timely exercise a purchase option for the office building that
was expressly due by July 15, 2018, where time was of the essence, Cummins Inc. has asked the court for a declaration that
it is entitled to purchase the building at the option price and to terminate the lease effective July 31, 2019. Cummins Inc.
does not dispute that it failed to comply with the requirements of the purchase option, but alleges that it is entitled to relief
under several equitable theories. Lexington Columbus (Jackson Street) L.P. filed a motion to dismiss the complaint on
January 8, 2019. The Company believes that Indiana law supports the Company's right to retain ownership of the building,
and the Company intends to vigorously defend this claim.

As of December 31, 2018, the Company maintained an executive severance policy and entered into related agreements with
certain of its executive officers whereby the Company's executives are entitled to severance benefits upon certain events.
In January 2018, the Company entered into retirement agreements with two of its then executive officers. One of the
retirement agreements provides for contingent payments, not to exceed $795, in 2020 following the receipt of certain
incentive fees by the Company, if any. As of December 31, 2018, $89 of these contingent payments was earned.

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
($000, except share/unit data)

(18)

Supplemental Disclosure of Statement of Cash Flow Information

Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash:

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

Restricted cash at beginning of period

2018

2017

2016

$ 107,762

86,637

93,249

4,394

31,142

10,637

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period

$ 112,156

$ 117,779

$ 103,886

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

Restricted cash at end of period

$ 168,750

$ 107,762

86,637

8,497

4,394

31,142

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period

$ 177,247

$ 112,156

$ 117,779

In addition to disclosures discussed elsewhere, during 2018, 2017 and 2016, the Company paid $76,562, $75,069 and
$87,692, respectively, for interest and $2,025, $2,340 and $1,240, respectively, for income taxes.

During 2017 and 2016, the Company conveyed its interests in certain properties to its lenders in full satisfaction of the
$12,616 and $21,582, respectively, non-recourse mortgage notes payable. In addition, during 2016, the Company sold its
interests in certain properties, which included the assumption by the buyers of the related non-recourse mortgage debt in
the aggregate amount of $242,269.

(19)

Unaudited Quarterly Financial Data

Total gross revenues

Net income (loss)

Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders

Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders -

basic per share

Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders -

diluted per share

Total gross revenues

Net income

Net income attributable to common shareholders

Net income attributable to common shareholders - basic per

Net income attributable to common shareholders - diluted

per share

3/31/2018

6/30/2018

9/30/2018

12/31/2018

102,637
$
(14,823) $
(15,957) $

105,493

$
(795) $
(3,327) $

99,958

220,850

216,190

(0.07) $

(0.01) $

0.91

(0.07) $

(0.01) $

0.90

87,251

25,674

23,796

0.10

3/31/2017

6/30/2017

9/30/2017

12/31/2017

96,099

42,220

40,397

0.17

95,684

7,365

5,519

0.02

97,689

5,596

3,916

0.02

102,169

31,448

29,235

0.12

The sum of the quarterly income (loss) attributable to common shareholders and per common share amounts may not equal
the full year amounts primarily because the computations of amounts allocated to participating securities and the weighted-
average number of common shares of the Company outstanding for each quarter and the full year are made independently.

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
($000, except share/unit data)

(20)

Subsequent Events

Subsequent to December 31, 2018 and in addition to disclosures elsewhere in the financial statements, the Company:

–

sold a consolidated property for $79,300;

acquired two industrial properties for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $58,000;

repurchased and retired 441,581 common shares at an average price of $8.13 per common share;

replaced the Company's revolving credit facility and the 2021 term loan with a new revolving credit facility and
the continuation of the 2021 term loan, which extended the maturity of the revolving credit facility to February
2023 and reduced the applicable margin rates on the revolving credit facility and 2021 term loan;

entered into an agreement to purchase upon completion the expansion of the Company's property in Richland,
Washington for $67,000; and

declared a quarterly common share dividend of $0.1025 per common share.

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization
Schedule III ($000)

Description

Location

Encumbrances

Land and
Land Estates

Buildings and
Improvements

Total

Single-tenant properties

Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization(1)

Date
Acquired

Date
Constructed

— $

1,201 $

16,771 $

17,972 $

Anniston, AL

Moody, AL

Opelika, AL

Goodyear, AZ

Orlando, FL

Tampa, FL

Lavonia, GA

McDonough, GA

Thomson, GA

Edwardsville, IL

Rantoul, IL

Rockford, IL

Romeoville, IL

Lafayette, IN

Lebanon, IN

New Century, KS

Dry Ridge, KY

Elizabethtown, KY

Hopkinsville, KY

Owensboro, KY

Shreveport, LA

North Berwick, ME

Detroit, MI

Kalamazoo, MI

Marshall, MI

Plymouth, MI

Romulus, MI

Warren, MI

Minneapolis, MN

Byhalia, MS

Canton, MS

Olive Branch, MS

Lumberton, NC

Shelby, NC

Statesville, NC

Durham, NH

North Las Vegas, NV

Erwin, NY

Industrial

Long Island City, NY

39,994

Chillicothe, OH

Cincinnati, OH

Columbus, OH

Glenwillow, OH

Hebron, OH

Streetsboro, OH

Wilsonville, OR

Bristol, PA

—

16,565

—

6,647

—

381

—

25,850

—

9,943

31,734

36,115

10,869

8,526

7,657

52,762

24,811

7,746

34,362

41,310

32,562

2,619

5,289

40,167

15,578

29,443

13,198

12,553

4,862

26,868

16,154

11,956

2,439

21,840

10,134

35,659

25,009

14,169

4,302

15,795

33,786

42,521

1,922

35,795

31,236

71,289

42,538

10,276

38,687

12,049

18,862

16,771

18,094

21,732

12,514

42,759

9,021

8,784

10,767

24,530

4,947

8,179

25,282

32,380

15,863

10,597

31,868

41,362

11,899

10,686

7,828

58,203

27,274

8,655

38,955

44,959

33,866

2,990

5,798

47,691

16,240

31,543

13,198

13,113

5,214

27,758

16,785

12,349

3,258

22,700

11,212

37,042

26,142

16,111

4,445

18,091

36,224

43,493

3,808

36,801

32,987

76,366

45,038

10,474

40,645

12,454

20,283

17,662

21,558

24,976

14,162

42,759

9,756

9,833

12,757

26,758

6,010

9,860

27,723

39,195

18,371

654

134

5,247

1,030

2,160

171

5,441

2,463

909

4,593

3,649

1,304

371

509

7,524

662

2,100

—

560

352

890

631

393

819

860

1,078

1,383

1,133

1,942

143

2,296

2,438

972

1,886

1,006

1,751

5,077

2,500

198

1,958

405

1,421

891

3,464

3,244

1,648

—

735

1,049

1,990

2,228

1,063

1,681

2,441

6,815

2,508

3,159

7,757

1,952

138

3,678

6,723

1,371

3,101

7,820

1,368

2,838

932

4,473

861

1,740

3,458

1,000

2,317

1,079

5,889

2,281

12,605

8,063

6,474

1,092

6,438

2,423

10,660

3,903

3,606

2,884

6,497

2,069

2,073

381

6,241

2,274

12,950

1,471

7,539

1,342

4,651

5,300

5,751

7,002

2,949

2,977

16,584

3,076

3,075

4,194

7,774

2,013

3,606

9,629

3,188

7,694

Dec-14

Feb-04

Jul-17

Nov-18

Dec-06

Jul-88

Sep-12

Aug-17

Dec-06

May-15

Dec-16

Jun-18

Jan-14

Dec-06

Dec-16

Oct-17

Feb-17

Jun-05

Dec-06

Mar-07

Jun-12

Dec-06

Jan-16

Sep-12

Jun-07

Nov-17

Sep-12

May-11

Sep-17

Mar-15

Apr-18

Dec-04

Apr-18

Dec-06

Jun-11

Dec-06

Jun-07

Jul-13

Sep-12

Mar-13

Oct-11

Dec-06

Dec-97

Dec-01

Jun-07

Sep-16

Mar-98

—

2017

—

2015

—

2014

—

2012

—

2011

—

2011

—

2014

—

2013

—

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization
Schedule III ($000) - continued

Description

Location

Encumbrances

Land and
Land Estates

Buildings and
Improvements

Total

Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization(1)

Date
Acquired

Date
Constructed

Industrial

Chester, SC

Laurens, SC

Spartanburg,SC

Cleveland, TN

Crossville, TN

Franklin, TN

Jackson, TN

Lewisburg, TN

Memphis, TN

Millington, TN

Smyrna, TN

Arlington, TX

Brookshire, TX

Carrollton, TX

Grand Prairie, TX

Houston, TX

Missouri City, TX

Pasadena, TX

San Antonio, TX

Chester, VA

Winchester, VA

Bingen, WA

Richland, WA

Oak Creek, WI

Multi-tenant/vacant properties

Industrial

Single-tenant properties

Office

Plymouth, IN

Henderson, NC

Duncan, SC

Antioch, TN

Memphis, TN

Glendale, AZ

Tempe, AZ

Tucson, AZ

Palo Alto, CA

Boca Raton, FL

Orlando, FL

McDonough, GA

Meridian, ID

Columbus, IN

Indianapolis, IN

Lenexa, KS

Baton Rouge, LA

Oakland, ME

Auburn Hills, MI

Kansas City, MO

Pascagoula, MS

Wall, NJ

Whippany, NJ

Redmond, OR

Philadelphia, PA

Florence, SC

Fort Mill, SC

Knoxville, TN

6,569

—

110,000

—

32,188

18,785

—

7,301

—

8,153

31,698

—

8,138

—

15,272

—

8,847

12,156

—

8,470

21,908

23,744

29,743

6,999

5,673

49,026

10,865

11,538

19,383

93,940

7,739

16,614

15,769

17,985

19,540

57,949

5,895

17,810

36,644

53,067

32,536

12,276

18,075

10,099

27,460

25,191

31,614

7,544

5,673

50,480

11,038

12,592

20,106

95,733

8,328

19,002

18,997

21,151

24,214

73,004

20,450

21,867

37,955

61,611

34,524

16,099

18,075

126,947

15,300

128,240

18,315

8,101

5,953

8,626

12,659

—

8,394

13,086

4,037

16,977

17,160

9,353

6,405

8,144

45,729

18,719

6,075

41,966

11,926

8,774

30,012

7,691

3,677

26,961

19,711

8,316

61,011

3,629

16,306

26,947

6,487

8,355

7,441

9,510

16,506

—

17,812

13,086

4,718

29,375

21,450

12,891

7,098

10,399

45,964

20,419

8,903

48,875

13,178

9,325

34,428

9,216

4,295

35,946

23,774

10,380

74,220

4,403

19,907

28,745

7,108

1,629

5,552

1,447

1,871

545

—

1,454

173

1,054

723

1,793

589

2,388

3,228

3,166

4,674

15,055

14,555

4,057

1,311

8,544

1,988

3,823

—

1,293

3,015

254

1,488

884

3,847

—

9,418

—

681

12,398

4,290

3,538

693

2,255

235

1,700

2,828

6,909

1,252

551

4,416

1,525

618

8,985

4,063

2,064

13,209

774

3,601

1,798

621

1,959

7,834

426

2,163

4,571

3,057

2,624

1,583

11,487

12,951

5,154

1,604

2,915

330

1,170

8,016

10,371

5,615

271

2,364

220

1,392

4,311

4,269

16,632

2,352

1,816

2,549

2,604

3,479

—

4,229

3,035

1,103

Sep-12

Jun-07

Aug-18

May-17

Jan-06

Sep-12

Sep-17

May-14

Feb-88

Apr-05

Sep-17

Sep-12

Mar-15

Sep-18

Jun-17

Mar-15

Mar-13

Apr-12

Aug-18

Jun-17

Dec-18

Dec-17

Jun-07

May-14

Nov-15

Jul-15

Sep-12

Nov-01

Jun-07

May-07

Dec-06

Sep-12

23,153

Dec-06

6,811

6,908

1,601

2,555

37,145

14,193

1,827

15,556

5,187

2,282

5,573

209

1,009

15,722

9,828

2,272

43,083

727

6,290

19,565

1,643

Feb-03

Jan-07

Sep-12

Dec-06

Apr-05

Sep-12

Jul-08

May-07

Sep-12

Mar-15

Jun-07

Sep-12

Jan-04

Nov-06

Sep-12

Jun-05

Feb-12

Dec-02

Nov-04

Sep-12

—

2014

—

2015

—

2012

—

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization
Schedule III ($000) - continued

Description

Location

Encumbrances

Land and
Land Estates

Buildings and
Improvements

Total

Accumulated
Depreciation
and
Amortization(1)

Date
Acquired

Date
Constructed

Office

Arlington, TX

Houston, TX

Lake Jackson, TX

Mission, TX

Westlake, TX

Herndon, VA

Multi-tenant/vacant properties

Office

Single-tenant properties

Other

Phoenix, AZ

Overland Park, KS

Charleston, SC

Farmers Branch, TX

Houston, TX

Venice, FL

Baltimore, MD

Pataskala, OH

Lawton, OK

Paris, TN

Danville, VA

Multi-tenant/vacant properties

Other

Construction in progress

Deferred loan costs, net

Albany, GA

Honolulu, HI

Watertown, NY

Fairlea, WV

—

187,980

—

32,112

6,878

—

(5,094)

1,274

1,875

7,435

2,556

2,361

5,127

1,096

2,025

1,189

3,984

800

4,696

4,605

5,000

3,605

663

247

3,454

455

8,259

270

—

15,309

10,959

141,436

2,911

26,631

25,293

6,193

10,976

9,419

32,842

27,667

16,583

12,834

148,871

5,467

28,992

30,420

7,289

13,001

10,608

36,826

28,467

11,753

16,449

9,071

—

1,288

547

—

1,206

7,414

2,333

216

—

4,605

5,000

3,605

1,951

794

3,454

1,661

15,673

2,603

295

1,840

—

587

240

—

6,025

—

3,489

8,345

12,105

1,038

13,421

11,353

Sep-12

Apr-05

Nov-16

Sep-12

May-07

Dec-99

229

Nov-01

4,242

4,651

14,111

21,686

Jun-07

Nov-06

Jun-07

Apr-05

Jan-15

Dec-06

Dec-15

Dec-18

Dec-06

Oct-13

Dec-06

May-07

—

2016/2017

—

2013

—

(1) Depreciation and amortization expense is calculated on a straight-line basis over the following lives:

570,420 $

341,848 $

2,746,446 $

3,090,134 $

722,644

Building and improvements

Land estates

Tenant improvements

Up to 40 years

Up to 51 years

Shorter of useful life or term
of related lease

LEXINGTON REALTY TRUST AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization
Schedule III ($000) - continued

The initial cost includes the purchase price paid directly or indirectly by the Company. The total cost basis of the Company's
properties at December 31, 2018 for federal income tax purposes was approximately $3.8 billion.

Reconciliation of real estate, at cost:

Balance at the beginning of year

Additions during year

Properties sold and impaired during the year

Other reclassifications

Balance at end of year

Reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization:

Balance at the beginning of year

Depreciation and amortization expense
Accumulated depreciation and amortization of properties sold

and impaired during year

Other reclassifications

Balance at end of year

2018

2017

2016

3,936,459

3,533,172

3,789,711

310,207
(1,091,956)
(64,576)
3,090,134

676,355
(270,241)
(2,827)
3,936,459

291,004
(527,597)
(19,946)
3,533,172

890,969

844,931

136,571

139,493

(290,938)
(13,958)
722,644

(93,455)
—

890,969

812,207

128,384

(86,428)
(9,232)
844,931

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Not applicable.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act), as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report, was made under
the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer
who are our Principal Executive Officer and our Principal Financial Officer, respectively. Management, including our Chief Executive
Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31,
2018.

Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting and for
performing an assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018. Our system of
internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles. Our system of internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets; (2) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our
management and the members of our Board of Trustees; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection
of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined
to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance that financial statements are fairly presented in accordance with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018. In assessing
the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, management used as guidance the criteria established in Internal
Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based
upon the assessment performed, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of
December 31, 2018.

Our independent registered public accounting firm, Deloitte & Touche LLP, which audited the financial statements included in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K that contain the disclosure required by this Item, independently assessed the effectiveness of the
Company's internal control over financial reporting. Deloitte & Touche LLP has issued an unqualified report on the Company's
internal control over financial reporting, which is included in “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in Part II, Item 8 of
this Annual Report.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

During the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2018, we operated and tested the previously reported remediation plan resulting
from the material weakness reported as of December 31, 2016. Other than the operation and testing of such remediation plan, there
were no other changes to our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange
Act) during the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2018 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

Not applicable.

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

PART III.

The information relating to our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, is included in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report. The
information relating to our trustees, including the audit committee of our Board of Trustees and our Audit Committee financial expert,
and certain information relating to our executive officers, trustees and trustee independence will be in our Definitive Proxy Statement
for our 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which we refer to as our Proxy Statement, and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The information required to be furnished pursuant to this item will be set forth under the appropriate captions in the Proxy

Statement, and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The information required to be furnished pursuant to this item will be set forth under the appropriate captions in the Proxy

Statement, and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

The information required to be furnished pursuant to this item will be set forth under the appropriate captions in the Proxy
Statement, and is incorporated herein by reference. In addition, certain information regarding related party transactions is set forth
in note 16 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements in “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” in Part II, Item
8 of this Annual Report.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

The information required to be furnished pursuant to this item will be set forth under the appropriate captions in the Proxy

Statement, and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

PART IV.

(a)(1) Financial Statements
(2) Financial Statement Schedules
(3) Exhibits

Exhibit No.

Description

Page
55
91
97

3.1

3.2

3.3
3.4

3.5

3.6

4.1

4.2

4.3

4.4

4.5

4.6

4.7

4.8

10.1

10.2

10.3

10.4

— Articles of Merger and Amended and Restated Declaration of Trust of the Company, dated December 31,
2006 (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 8, 2007 (the “01/08/07
8-K”))(1)

— Articles Supplementary Relating to the Reclassification of 8.05% Series B Cumulative Redeemable
Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and 7.55% Series D Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock,
par value $0.0001 per share (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed
November 21, 2013)(1)

— Amended and Restated By-laws of the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the 01/08/07 8-K)(1)
— First Amendment to Amended and Restated By-laws of the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s

Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 20, 2009)(1)

— Second Amendment to the Amended and Restated By-laws of the Company (filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the

Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 3, 2017)(1)

— Sixth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of LCIF, dated as of December 30, 2013
(filed as Exhibit 3.25 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2013)(1)

— Specimen of Common Shares Certificate of the Company (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Annual

Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006)(1)

— Form of 6.50% Series C Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock certificate (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the

Company’s Registration Statement on Form 8A filed December 8, 2004)(1)

— Amended and Restated Trust Agreement, dated March 21, 2007, among the Company, The Bank of New
York Trust Company, National Association (“BONY”), The Bank of New York (Delaware), the
Administrative Trustees (as named therein) and the several holders of the Preferred Securities from time
to time (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 27, 2007 (the
“03/27/07 8-K”))(1)

— Junior Subordinated Indenture, dated as of March 21, 2007, between the Company and BONY (filed as

Exhibit 4.2 to the 03/27/07 8-K)(1)

— Indenture, dated as of June 10, 2013, among the Company, certain subsidiaries of the Company signatories
thereto, and U.S. Bank, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed
on June 13, 2013)(1)

— First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 30, 2013, among the Company, certain subsidiaries
of the Company signatories thereto, and U.S. Bank, as trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company's Current
Report on Form 8-K filed on October 3, 2013)(1)

— Indenture, dated as of May 9, 2014, among the Company, LCIF and U.S. Bank, as trustee (filed as Exhibit

4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 13, 2014)(1)

— First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of May 20, 2014 among the Company, LCIF and U.S. Bank, as
trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 20, 2014)(1)

— 1994 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (1, 2)

— Lexington Realty Trust Amended and Restated 2011 Equity-Based Award Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to

the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed May 18, 2017)(1, 4)

— Form of Compensation Agreement (Long-Term Compensation) between the Company and each of the
following officers: Richard J. Rouse and Patrick Carroll (filed as Exhibit 10.15 to the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, filed on March 16, 2005 (the “2004 10-K”))
(1, 4)

— Form of Compensation Agreement (Bonus and Long-Term Compensation) between the Company and each
of the following officers: E. Robert Roskind and T. Wilson Eglin (filed as Exhibit 10.16 to the 2004 10-
K)(1, 4)

10.5

10.6

10.7

10.8

10.9

10.10

10.11

10.12

10.13

10.14

10.15

10.16

10.17

10.18

10.19

10.20

10.21

10.22

10.23

10.24

10.25

10.26

— Form of Share Option Award Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form

8-K/A filed on November 24, 2010 (the “11/24/10 8-K/A”))(1, 4)

— Form of 2010 Share Option Award Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the 11/24/10 8-K/A)(1, 4)

— Form of December 2010 Share Option Award Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current

Report on Form 8-K filed January 6, 2011(1, 4)

— Amended and Restated Rabbi Trust Agreement, originally dated January 26, 1999 (filed as Exhibit 10.2

to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 2, 2009)(1, 4)

— Employment Agreement, dated as of September 11, 2014 and effective as of January 15, 2015, between
the Company and T. Wilson Eglin (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-
Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 filed November 7, 2014 (the “09/30/14 10-Q”))(1, 4)

— Employment Agreement, dated as of September 11, 2014 and effective as of January 15, 2015, between

the Company and E. Robert Roskind (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the 09/30/14 10-Q)(1, 4)

— Employment Agreement, dated as of September 11, 2014 and effective as of January 15, 2015, between

the Company and Richard J. Rouse (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the 09/30/14 10-Q)(1, 4)

— Employment Agreement, dated as of September 11, 2014 and effective as of January 15, 2015, between

the Company and Patrick Carroll (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the 09/30/14 10-Q)(1, 4)

— Retirement Agreement, dated January 18, 2018, between the Company and Richard J. Rouse (filed as
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 19, 2018 (the “1/19/18 8-K”))
(1, 4)

— Retirement Agreement, dated January 18, 2018, between the Company and E. Robert Roskind (filed as

Exhibit 10.2 to the 1/19/18 8-K)(1, 4)

— Lexington Realty Trust Executive Severance Plan with related Severance Policy Agreements with E. Robert
Roskind, T. Wilson Eglin, Patrick Carroll, Joseph S. Bonventre and Beth Boulerice (filed as Exhibit 10.3
to the 1/19/18 8-K)(1, 4)

— Form of Long-Term Retention Nonvested Share Agreement (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current

Report on Form 8-K filed on January 11, 2013)(1, 4))

— Form of 2015 Nonvested Share Agreement (Performance and Service) (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the

Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 9, 2015)(1, 4)

— Form of 2017 Nonvested Share Agreement (Performance and Service) (filed as Exhibit 10.17 to the

Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016)(1, 4)

— Form of Amended and Restated Indemnification Agreement between the Company and certain officers
and trustees (filed as Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Quarterly Report Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008)(1)

— Funding Agreement, dated as of July 23, 2006, by and between LCIF and the Company (filed as Exhibit

99.4 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 24, 2006)(1)

— Letter Agreement among the Company (as successor by merger), Apollo Real Estate Investment Fund III,
L.P., NKT Advisors LLC, Vornado Realty Trust, VNK Corp., Vornado Newkirk LLC, Vornado MLP GP
LLC and WEM-Brynmawr Associates LLC (filed as Exhibit 10.15 to Amendment No. 5 to Newkirk
Registration Statement on Form S-11/A filed October 28, 2005 (“Amendment No. 5 to NKT’s S-11”))(1)

— Amendment to the Letter Agreement among the Company (as successor by merger), Apollo Real Estate
Investment Fund III, L.P., NKT Advisors LLC, Vornado Realty Trust, Vornado Realty L.P., VNK Corp.,
Vornado Newkirk LLC, Vornado MLP GP LLC, and WEM-Brynmawr Associates LLC (filed as Exhibit
10.25 to Amendment No. 5 to NKT’s S-11)(1)

— Second Amended and Restated Ownership Limit Waiver Agreement (Vornado), dated as of December 6,
2010, between the Company and Vornado Realty, L.P. (together with certain affiliates) (filed as Exhibit
10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 6, 2010)(1)

— Credit Agreement, dated as of September 1, 2015, among the Company and LCIF, as borrowers, each of
the financial institutions initially a signatory thereto together with their assignees pursuant to 12.5 therein,
and KeyBank National Association, as agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report of
Form 8-K filed on September 1, 2015)(1)

— First Amendment to Credit Agreement and Agreement Regarding Revolving Line Commitment and Term
Loan Increases, dated as of September 29, 2017, among the Company and LCIF, as borrowers, and KeyBank
National Association, as agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed
on October 2, 2017)(1)

— Second Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2018, among the Company, as borrower,
KeyBank National Association, as agent, and each of the lenders signatory thereto (filed as Exhibit 10.1
to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 28, 2018)(1)

10.27

21
23.1
23.2
24

31.1

31.2

32.1

32.2

— Credit Agreement, dated as of February 6, 2019, among the Company, as borrower, each of the financial
institutions initially signatory thereto together with their assignees pursuant to Section 12.5 therein and
KeyBank, as agent (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company's Current Report of Form 8-K filed on February
11, 2019)(1)

— Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (2)

— List of subsidiaries (2)
— Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP (2)
— Consent of KPMG LLP (2)
— Power of Attorney (included on signature page)

— Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange

Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (2)

— Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange

Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (2)

— Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section

906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (3)

— Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section

906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (3)

101.INS
101.SCH
101.CAL
101.DEF
101.LAB
101.PRE

— XBRL Instance Document (2, 5)
— XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema (2, 5)
— XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase (2, 5)
— XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document (2, 5)
— XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document (2, 5)
— XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (2, 5)

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

Incorporated by reference.

Filed herewith.

This exhibit shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or Section
18 of the Securities Exchanges Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liabilities of those sections, and shall not
be part of any registration statement to which it may relate, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other
document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as set forth by specific reference in such filing or document.

Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

Attached as Exhibit 101 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K are the following materials, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting
Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2018 and 2017; (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended
December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016; (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2018,
2017 and 2016; (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016; (v) the Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016; and (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, detailed
tagged.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

SIGNATURES

Dated: March 12, 2019

Lexington Realty Trust

By:

/s/ T. Wilson Eglin

T. Wilson Eglin
Chief Executive Officer

100

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints T.
Wilson Eglin and Patrick Carroll, and each of them severally, his true and lawful attorney-in-fact with power of substitution and
resubstitution to sign in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to do any and all things and execute any and all
instruments that such attorney may deem necessary or advisable under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and any rules, regulations
and requirements of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K and any
and all amendments hereto, as fully for all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, and hereby ratifies and confirms
all said attorneys-in-fact and agents, each acting alone, and his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof. Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.

Signature

Title

/s/ E. Robert Roskind
E. Robert Roskind

/s/ T. Wilson Eglin
T. Wilson Eglin

/s/ Patrick Carroll
Patrick Carroll

/s/ Beth Boulerice
Beth Boulerice

/s/ Richard S. Frary
Richard S. Frary

/s/ Lawrence L. Gray
Lawrence L. Gray

/s/ Jamie Handwerker
Jamie Handwerker

/s/ Claire A. Koeneman
Claire A. Koeneman

/s/ Howard Roth
Howard Roth

Each dated: March 12, 2019

Chairman of the Board of Trustees of the Trust

Chief Executive Officer, President and Trustee of the Trust
(principal executive officer)

Chief Financial Officer, Executive Vice President and Treasurer of
the Trust
(principal financial officer)

Executive Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer of the Trust
(principal accounting officer)

Trustee of the Trust

101

(This page intentionally left blank)

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Exhibit 31.1

I, T. Wilson Eglin, certify that:

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Lexington Realty Trust;

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the
periods presented in this report;

The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
which this report is being prepared;

designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting
to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during
the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting; and

The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize
and report financial information; and

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

March 12, 2019

/s/ T. Wilson Eglin

T. Wilson Eglin
Chief Executive Officer

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Exhibit 31.2

I, Patrick Carroll, certify that:

I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K of Lexington Realty Trust;

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role
in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

March 12, 2019

/s/ Patrick Carroll

Patrick Carroll

Chief Financial Officer

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Exhibit 32.1

In connection with the Annual Report of Lexington Realty Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, T. Wilson Eglin, Chief Executive Officer of the
Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the issuer.

/s/ T. Wilson Eglin

T. Wilson Eglin
Chief Executive Officer

March 12, 2019

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Exhibit 32.2

In connection with the Annual Report of Lexington Realty Trust (the “Trust”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31,
2018 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Patrick Carroll, Chief Financial Officer of the
Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the issuer.

/s/ Patrick Carroll

Patrick Carroll

Chief Financial Officer
March 12, 2019

(This page intentionally left blank)

COMPANY OVERVIEW

CORPORATE INFORMATION

EDWARDSVILLE, ILLINOIS | INDUSTRIAL

Non-Executive Trustees

Richard S. Frary 1,2,4,5,6
Founding Partner
Tallwood Associates, Inc.

Lawrence L. Gray1,2,4,6
Chief Executive Officer
GrayCo, Inc.

Executive Officers

T. Wilson Eglin4
Chairman
Chief Executive Officer
President

Joseph S. Bonventre
Executive Vice President
General Counsel
Secretary

Jamie Handwerker1,3,6
Partner
KSH Capital

Claire A. Koeneman2,3,6
Partner
Bully Pulpit Interactive

Beth Boulerice
Chief Financial Officer
Executive Vice President
Treasurer

Patrick Carroll
Chief Risk Officer
Executive Vice President

Howard S. Roth1,3,6
Principal
HSR Advisors

James Dudley
Executive Vice President

Lara Johnson
Executive Vice President

Brendan Mullinix
Executive Vice President

Corporate Headquarters

Investor Relations

Transfer Agent and Registrar

One Penn Plaza, Suite 4015
New York, NY 10119
Tel: (212) 692-7200

Regional Office

12400 Coit Road, Suite 970
Dallas, TX 75251
Tel : (214) 210-3770

Web Site

www.lxp.com

Information contained on our web
site or the web site of any other
person is not incorporated by refer-
ence into this annual report or any
of our filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission.

10-K Certification and Filing

Lexington Realty Trust
One Penn Plaza, Suite 4015
New York, NY 10119-4015
Attn: Investor Relations
Telephone: (212) 692-7200
E-mail: ir@lxp.com or
hgentry@lxp.com

Annual Meeting

Our Annual Meeting of
Shareholders is scheduled for
Tuesday, May 21, 2019 at 10:00 a.m.,
Eastern Time, at the offices of
Paul Hastings LLP, 200 Park
Avenue, New York, NY 10166.

Forward-Looking Statements

NYSE Symbols

LXP (Common)
LXPPRC (Preferred)

Computershare
PO Box 50500
Louisville, KY 40233
Tel: (800) 850-3948 (toll-free)
(201) 680-6578 (outside of U.S.)
www-us.computershare.com/
investor

Overnight correspondence:
Computershare
462 South 4th Street, Suite 1600
Louisville, KY 40202

Direct Share Purchase Plan

Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm

Deloitte & Touche LLP, U.S.
New York, NY

1 Audit Committee Member

2 Compensation Committee Member

3 Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Member
4 Executive Committee Member
5 Lead Trustee
6 Independent Trustee

HEADERLXP 2018 ANNUAL REPORTT
S
U
R
T

Y
T
L
A
E
R

N
O
T
G
N
X
E
L

Lexington Realty Trust

One Penn Plaza, Suite 4015

New York, NY 10119

www.lxp.com

T
S
U
R
T

Y
T
L
A
E
R

N
O
T
G
N
X
E
L

2 0 1 8 A N N U A L R E P O R T