Maiden Holdings, Ltd.
Annual Report 2017

Plain-text annual report

MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. Delivering a Customer-Centric Reinsurance Strategy 2017 Annual Report THE MAIDEN DIFFERENCEObjective To support the non-catastrophe capital needs of regional and specialty insurers and deliver stable, profitable underwriting performance and strong operating returns.business FOcus We provide customized, non-catastrophic reinsurance solutions and other forms of long-term capital support. By focusing on our clients’ lower-level or “working layer” reinsurance needs, we participate in the more predictable, actuarially credible segments of their reinsurance programs. We seek to avoid the volatility associated with severity events such as catastrophes and to mitigate the impact of market cycles by developing long-term solutions for our clients.custOmer relatiOnships We work collaboratively with our clients to gain an in-depth understanding of their business. Each account is served by a multi-functional team, including underwriters, actuaries, accountants and claims specialists. Our customized solutions meet the unique needs of each client, and we provide value-added services above and beyond the reinsur-ance contract. We aspire to be our clients’ main reinsurance relationship, and our long-term partnerships result in a stable book of business.histOry Founded in 2007, the core of our platform is the former GMAC RE business, which was purchased in 2008 and has a 35-year history of steady, long-term client relationships. Most of Maiden’s senior managers were former leaders of the GMAC reinsurance and insurance businesses.Financial strength Our strong balance sheet supports the needs of our clients. Our principal operating subsidiaries are rated A– (Excellent) by A.M. Best.client suppOrt In addition to our strong balance sheet, Maiden further supports its commitment to clients with the fully collateralized Dedicated Financial Trust®. Each U.S. client with more than $1 million of liabilities has access to an individually segregated trust account backed by highly rated, liquid assets. This unique solution provides full transparency of results and generates exceptional customer loyalty.Bermuda > United States > United Kingdom > Select International MarketsMaiden Holdings, Ltd. 2017 Annual ReportFinancial HighlightsFor the Year Ended December 31(in $ millions, except per share data)20172016201520142013Gross premiums written$ 2,816$ 2,831$ 2,663$ 2,507$ 2,204Net premiums written2,7622,6552,5142,4582,096Net premiums earned2,7332,5682,4292,2522,001Net investment income16614613111791Underwriting (loss) income(277)(53)446569(Loss) income from operations(1)(130)71150161145Net (loss) income(2)(170)48124102103Operating (loss) earnings(1)(185)1710711888Diluted earnings per common share attributable to Maiden shareholders$ (2.32)$ 0.19$ 1.31$ 1.04$ 1.18Diluted OP operating earnings per common share attributable to Maiden shareholders(1)$ (2.16)$ 0.22$ 1.39$ 1.53$ 1.18Combined ratio111.3%103.2%99.3%98.0%97.5%Total investable assets(2)$ 5,508$ 5,054$ 4,628$ 4,030$ 3,552Total assets6,6446,2525,7045,1544,700Total capital resources(3)1,4951,7231,7081,6011,610Maiden shareholders’ equity1,2321,3611,3481,2411,124Annualized operating return on average common shareholders’ equity(1)(20.4)%1.9%12.0%13.6%10.5%Book value per common share$ 9.25$ 12.12$ 11.77$ 12.69$ 11.14Common share price$ 6.60$ 17.45$ 14.91$ 12.79$ 10.93Market capitalization$ 548$ 1,505$ 1,099$ 933$ 7941. Income from operations, operating earnings, and the related metrics operating earnings per common share and operating return on average common shareholders’ equity, as well as investable assets, are non-GAAP financial measures. Operating earnings should not be viewed as a substitute for U.S. GAAP net income. Operating earnings are an internal performance measure used in the management of our operations and represent net income excluding, as applicable, realized and unrealized investment gains and losses, net impairment losses recognized in earnings, foreign exchange and other gain or loss, the amortization of intangible assets, divested excess and surplus and NGHC run-off, accelerated amortization of debt discount and issuance cost, interest expense incurred related to 7.75% senior notes prior to actual redemption of the debt and non-cash deferred tax charge. Please see the disclosure on non-GAAP financial measures under Key Financial Measures on page 48 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information and Reconciliation to GAAP for operating earnings, operating earnings per common share, and operating return on average common shareholders’ equity. Please see the inside back cover for additional information and reconciliation to GAAP for income from operations and investable assets. The Company’s management believes that income from operations, operating earnings, operating earnings per common share, operating return on common equity, and investable assets are useful indicators of trends in the Company’s underlying operations. The Company’s measure of income from operations, operating earnings, operating earnings per common share, operating return on common equity and investable assets may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.2. Maiden’s net income was impacted by certain non-recurring charges in 2014 related to the repurchase of junior subordinated debt. 2014 results include $28.2 million of junior subordinated debt accelerated amortization of discount and issuance costs. 3. Total capital is the sum of the Company’s principal amount of debt and Maiden shareholders’ equity. The junior subordinated debt was fully redeemed in January 2014.Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 2017 Annual ReportHomeowners’ 1%Other 1%Business Distribution2017 Gross Premiums Written of $2.8 BillionWorkers’ Compensation 41%Personal Auto 13%Fire, Allied Lines and Inland Marine 3%Accident & Health 3%Other Liability 8%Warranty 9%Commercial Auto 12%Commercial Multi-Peril 7%European Hospital Liability 2%2DIVERSIFIED REINSURANCEIn the U.S., Maiden primarily provides reinsurance capital support to regional and specialty insurers.Our focus includes:• Commercial and personal auto, including non-standard • General liability, including low hazard umbrella • Commercial multi-peril • Non-catastrophic property • Workers’ compensation • Accident and health • Equipment breakdownWe provide both treaty and facultative reinsurance support on either a quota share or excess of loss basis, with reinsurance structures customized to meet the specific needs of each client.Internationally, through our International Insurance Services unit (“IIS”), we work with original equipment automobile manufacturers (“OEM”) and related credit providers to design and implement insurance programs in auto distribution-related consumer insurance products such as:• Personal auto • Credit life • Payment protection • Capital solutionsBased in the U.K., the IIS business, which generates both fee income as well as reinsurance opportunities, is currently concentrated in Europe, primarily in Germany and the U.K., with smaller programs in place globally.Our international business is primarily underwritten through our Bermuda operations.In 2017, Diversified Reinsurance had $823 million of net premiums earned.Personal Auto 31%Diversified Reinsurance2017 Gross Premiums Written of $823 MillionOther Casualty 23%International 10%Accident & Health 11%Property 20%Commercial Auto 5%3AMTRUST STRATEGIC RELATIONSHIPMaiden’s multi-year quota share agreement with specialty insurer AmTrust Financial Services, Inc. (“AmTrust”) provides a solid foundation of long-term revenues and profitable growth.Initiated in 2007, the renewable AmTrust relationship involves a 40% quota share agreement of a highly diversified portfolio of business, including:• Small Commercial Business: primarily workers’ compensation and commercial package lines in the U.S.• Specialty Risk and Extended Warranty: consumer and commercial goods and custom- designed coverages in the U.S. and Europe– Included within the Specialty Risk and Extended Warranty business, Maiden also reinsures a quota share of AmTrust’s European hospital liability business, which renews on an annual basis• Specialty Programs: workers’ compensation and other commercial coverages for narrowly defined classes of risk requiring in-depth knowledge of industry segmentsThe AmTrust relationship produced $1.9 billion of net premiums earned in 2017.Small Commercial Business 64%AmTrust Reinsurance2017 Gross Premiums Written of $2.0 BillionSpecialty Risk and Extended Warranty 18%Specialty Program 18%TO OUR SHAREHOLDERSTwo thousand seventeen was a challenging year for Maiden—the most financially challenging in our history.Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 2017 Annual ReportOur performance was impacted by adverse loss reserve development relating to business written in prior years, within our strategic relationship with AmTrust Financial Services, Inc., and, to a lesser extent, in our Diversified Reinsurance segment. Although we aggressively addressed these conditions as they became apparent and made changes to our risk portfolio to safeguard against their future recurrence, they nevertheless resulted in our recognizing a substantial loss for the year.Ironically, these historical losses obscured the fact that 2017 was otherwise a successful year for Maiden opera-tionally. We strengthened our capabilities, enhanced our offering of differentiating products and services, launched exciting new initiatives, developed promising new client and partner relationships, and again recorded solid rates of client retention. Above all, we are pleased with the rates and terms achieved on business bound in 2017, including the January 1, 2018 renewal season. Today, Maiden is positioned well for the future.Pursuing Our Long-Term Strategy for Stability and ProfitabilitySince our founding, Maiden has pursued a strategy that differentiates our Company from most other property and casualty reinsurers. Focused on the low-volatility, non-catastrophe reinsurance needs of our clients, our objective has been to provide reinsurance capital support to regional and specialty insurers. In doing so, our focus is on less volatile lines of business and more predictable quota share and lower attachment excess of loss reinsur-ance programs. Notwithstanding the results of 2017, in general, this has resulted in a steadier earnings stream 4In $ millionsTotal Assets$5,704$6,252$6,644’16’17’15’“Our total catastrophe-related losses in 2017 were $10 million, compared to total industry catastrophe losses estimated at approximately $135 billion.”than the wild swings in performance experienced by catastrophe reinsurers.We maintain two discreet operating segments, both focused on lower volatility. In doing so, we maintain a strong strategic relationship with AmTrust, which serves as an important source of our business, while at the same time we maintain a unique highly differentiated Diversified Reinsurance segment, serving a loyal and growing clientele of small and mid-sized specialty and regional carriers.In 2017, we experienced the unusual circumstance of adverse loss reserve development in both segments. Despite these challenges, it is worth noting that our rein-surance contracts with AmTrust have been profitable on an inception-to-date basis. Moreover, we continue to monitor closely our business and relationship with AmTrust; we have observed their steps to enhance their claims processing and the significant re-underwriting and down-sizing of their program business. Over the longer term, we believe these improvements will ultimately result in improved performance.Improvements Across Our Diversified Reinsurance SegmentThroughout much of the reinsurance industry, 2017 was noted for its record level of catastrophes, with heavy costs inflicted by hurricanes Harvey, Irma and Maria, and by the California wildfires. For Maiden, however, our strategy of strongly managing catastrophe exposure resulted in a comparatively modest impact. For the year, our total catastrophe-related losses, incurred through certain non-catastrophe lines of business, were $10 million, compared to our total portfolio of $2.8 billion in gross premiums written. We believe this was a strong validation of our low-volatility, low-severity strategy.Where we did experience negative performance, how-ever, was largely due to higher than expected loss emer-gence emanating largely from commercial auto as well as certain specific contracts across several lines of business, with over half of the development coming from two accounts. The accounts driving the adverse development are terminated and consistent with underwriting actions taken beginning in 2016. As a result of these actions, in 2017 commercial auto decreased to 5% of the U.S. diver-sified reinsurance written premium, down from 20% in 2011. Today we are taking a highly selective underwriting approach, where we can evaluate and price each risk individually.Positive Organic Growth, Attracting New Clients. In other lines, our Diversified Reinsurance business per-formed satisfactorily. We experienced organic growth both in existing accounts and through new relationships. Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 2017 Annual Report5 PercentCombined Ratio99.3%103.2%111.3%’16’17’15“New turnkey products allow clients to quickly expand with Equipment Breakdown product offerings.”This was a direct result of our client-centric approach of providing outstanding, responsive customized service and by differentiating Maiden through a host of value-added products and solutions.Personal auto continued to be a focus of profitable growth, especially in the non-standard auto arena, where the limited severity of exposure fits well with Maiden’s lower-risk strategic profile. Maiden achieved both organic growth and attracted new customers. We are bullish about our personal auto business, both standard and non-standard, for the coming years.We also saw good performance from our umbrella liability line as well as in our excess-of-loss workers’ compensation book. Accident and Health (A&H) continued its steady growth and has grown to occupy a larger space within our portfolio, to become a healthy contributor to profits over the past few years.Developing New Products to Help Our Clients Succeed. One of Maiden’s core strengths has always been in devel-oping customized products and services that respond to our customers’ needs. In 2016, Maiden developed turnkey products to enable clients to offer equipment breakdown coverage for commercial and farm-owner policies, which would in turn be reinsured by Maiden. In 2017, we responded quickly to an attractive opportunity to expand that to personal homeowner lines, and created equipment breakdown and service-line coverages as add-on endorsements to homeowner and farmowner policies. We are enthusiastic about its prospects for 2018.We also entered into a partnership with a leading cyber and specialty provider to design a range of potential new products that would enable our clients to grow their business by offering a more comprehensive product line. Through this relationship, Maiden can supply a client with a turnkey solution that includes underwriting guidelines, pricing, policy forms and everything necessary to go to market with a new line of business.Using Technology to Help Our Clients— and Ourselves. With the increasing number of emerging technologies entering the insurance market, Maiden is focused on how our clients can benefit from these advancements. While much of our focus is on the improvement of risk identification, quantification, and mitigation, there are few parts of the insurance process that are not under pressure to innovate and re-imagine. With the explosive growth of InsurTech—technologies designed specifically for the insurance industry—the adoption of new innovations has become essential for any company to maintain its Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 2017 Annual Report6In $ millionsGross Premiums Written$2,663$2,831$2,816’16’17’15Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 2017 Annual Report competitive advantage. In today’s market, many companies financial support to technology companies that are critical are constrained by limited resources. Maiden’s goal is to to our clients. It was on this thesis that Maiden made a help customers identify and track relevant technology, strategic investment in Betterview, a leading software and work with customers to test technology in their own real service provider utilizing drones to capture and analyze world environment, and integrate the functionality of the insurance data. Their flexible business model made it technology into the reinsurance relationship. easy for customers to test the technology and processes. One of our most exciting developments has been our membership in Plug N Play, a Silicon Valley accelerator. Plug N Play creates a dynamic to allow technology, industry participants and capital providers to interact. The flexibil- Once the customer has experience in how the service integrates with their own work flows, they have the flexibility to operate along the full range of insourced to outsourced services. ity of this arrangement allows companies to engage in a Maiden also continued to introduce new tools that harness wide variety of ways. Be it small scale testing of emerging the predictive power of data analytics. We have built technology or early deployment of developing technology, intelligent user-friendly systems that guide decisions in the insights gained can have a meaningful strategic benefit. several business areas. We went beyond traditional As each client has unique needs, we will continue to bring approaches to leverage dynamic public data sources and groups of customers to the accelerator for direct exposure state-of-the-art machine learning algorithms. Our partner, to an array of technology. Be it data enrichment which Tiger Analytics, with their expertise in data sciences and promises to change the industry information flows, cus- artificial intelligence, played an instrumental role in devel- tomer engagement technology which promises to change oping these systems. In 2017 we launched a number of the way we communicate with customers, or the wide proprietary tools to help our clients to better evaluate risk. array of Internet of Things sensors that promise to rede- fine how we monitor and mitigate risk, the potential impact of technology has never been greater. By helping our clients navigate these changes, we believe we can help them improve their performance and strengthen the long-term relationships which we pursue. Seizing New Opportunities at International Insurances Services Internationally, Maiden’s IIS business had a year of solid underwriting profitability and continued to build on its sound foundation for the future. In our branded OEM business, Maiden designs, manages and reinsures private- In support of this customer-centric technology strategy, label retail auto insurance programs for major manufac- we have also chosen to invest in select transformative turers and auto dealers. In 2017 we rebranded our technology providers. This activity allows us to provide German business for an expanded client base, and now “With the explosive growth of InsurTech—the adoption of new technologies has become essential for any company to maintain its competitive advantage.” 6 7777 “Fintech companies will provide additional underwriting opportunities in the European market.”service an extended range of international car manufac-turers, financial service providers and a network of over 1,500 dealers, primarily in Germany and Austria.In IIS’s Swedish life and general insurance businesses, trading as Maiden Life & General, we are excited about opportunities across Europe for our credit and income protection products such as short-term life, disability and unemployment coverage in association with affinity groups, auto manufacturers and emerging fintech companies. Taking advantage of our operating efficiency and agility, we create and underwrite transparent, consumer orientated, low-commission products, quicker and more efficiently than traditional larger carriers.With a number of programs already written and a healthy pipeline, our life and general business is growing at a measured, profitable pace.Looking ahead for IIS, we see significant additional under-writing opportunities, including partnerships with fintech companies, select brokers and niche life and accident markets. With its past firmly embedded in OEM retail insurance, IIS is also ideally placed as an insurance partner in the changing European automotive market as it evolves with changing mobility ownership and vehicle design.Advancing Maiden’s Capital Solutions Internationally Our Capital Solutions business continued to make inroads into the European marketplace and steadily cemented Maiden’s reputation as a differentiated capital provider. We first introduced this initiative to help smaller and mid-sized carriers, constrained by their limited access to capital markets, to utilize reinsurance as well as subor-dinated debt to meet their capital requirements under Europe’s Solvency II guidelines. With the subsequent publication of solvency ratios, clients have now recog-nized that Maiden’s offering can also help them improve upon their ratios to gain a competitive advantage.Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 2017 Annual Report8In $ millionsInvestable Assets$4,628$5,054$5,508’16’17’15In $ millionsNet Investment Income$131$146$166’16’17’15Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 2017 Annual Report “Our capital solutions product offerings in Europe were expanded in 2017 with the introduction of Libra.” We added several new clients across the Continent and Our combined ratio for 2017 was 111.3%, compared to demonstrated both our commitment to the market the combined ratio of 103.2% reported in 2016, reflect- and our long-term, gradual approach towards growing ing this year’s increased reserving activity. Our general the business. During the year we unveiled Libra, which and administrative expense ratio was a slim 2.6%, among expanded on our core capital solutions concept by adding the lowest in the industry, reflecting our characteristically new flexibility options. At January 2018 renewals, we saw lean operations. The Diversified Reinsurance segment an uptick in interest and wrote several new capital solu- had a combined ratio of 107.1%, compared to 109.4% in tions contracts, including expanding our business into 2016, reflecting issues in commercial auto and certain Israel, which is in the process of adopting Solvency II rules. specific contracts, as noted. The AmTrust Reinsurance We are now exploring ways to expand Capital Solutions segment combined ratio was 110.8% in 2017, compared to benefit our clients in the U.S. marketplace. to 98.4% in 2016. Financial Results For 2017, net investment income rose to $166.3 million, As noted earlier, Maiden’s financial results reflected a an increase of 14% compared to 2016, reflecting a sound substantial adverse loss development relating to prior investment performance and the significant increase in years’ business in both our AmTrust Reinsurance segment our investable assets, which increased 9% to $5.5 billion, and in our Diversified Segment commercial auto lines. compared to $5.1 billion at December 31, 2016. At the Net loss attributable to Maiden common shareholders was $199.1 million, or $2.32 per diluted common share, com- pared to net income of $15.2 million, or $0.19 per diluted end of the year, the average yield on the fixed income portfolio (excluding cash) was 3.1%, with an average duration of 4.5 years. common share, in fiscal year 2016. Net operating loss was Careful Capital Management and a Commitment to $184.9 million, or $2.16 per diluted common share, com- Rewarding Shareholders pared to net operating earnings of $17.3 million, or $0.22 Maiden has always been diligent in preserving the strength per diluted common share in 2016. Gross premiums writ- of its balance sheet and maintaining the suitability of our ten totaled $2.8 billion, essentially unchanged from 2016. capital structure to our operating requirements, while Net premiums written increased 4.0%, due to decreased also taking advantage of marketplace opportunities. retrocessional coverage taken in 2017. In the AmTrust Despite the year’s results, we continue to maintain a Reinsurance segment, gross premiums written were strong balance sheet and strong operating cash flows. $2.0 billion, relatively consistent with 2016. Gross premiums During the year, we took the opportunity to further lower written in the Diversified Reinsurance segment totaled our cost of capital and successfully offered $150 million $822.8 million compared to $824.3 million in 2016. of 6.70% Non-Cumulative Preference Shares, with the proceeds used to repay $100 million of outstanding 8.00% 8 9 Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 2017 Annual Report Senior Notes due 2042 and to support our reinsurance term it would be a positive development as our investment business and for general corporate purposes. We remain income would rise as our fixed income assets mature. committed to rewarding our shareholders and maintained a generous dividend payout, while also repurchasing 3.7 million common shares at a significant discount to tangible book value for a total of $25.7 million. Looking Ahead On the regulatory front, we continue to navigate a chang- ing landscape. As a Bermuda-based company, recent U.S. tax reform may require us to make some adjustments, but we do not envision it having any material effect on Maiden. In Europe, we are well prepared for whatever As we look to the future, our foremost task is to continue will occur with Brexit, as most of our operations there to work with all urgency to restore our underwriting are now focused outside the U.K. profitability as well as investor confidence. We are committed to do all that is necessary to return Externally, there are many additional considerations to to profitability and continue to develop our unique differ- contend with. We continue to face a competitive market entiated business. We are grateful to our shareholders, environment. The interest rate outlook also remains our customers, and the entire Maiden team for their uncertain, as improving economic conditions suggest a continued support. rise in rates is likely. Although an increase in interest rates would initially affect our bond portfolio negatively, longer Sincerely, Arturo M. R aschbaum President and Chief Executive Officer Barry D. Zyskind Chairman of the Board of Directors 10 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, Ltd. FORM 10-K UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2017 OR Commission File Number: 001-34042 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter) Bermuda (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) 98-0570192 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 94 Pitts Bay Road Pembroke HM 08, Bermuda (Address of Principal Executive Offices and Zip Code) (441) 298-4900 (Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class Common Shares, par value $0.01 per share Series A Preference Shares, par value $0.01 per share Series C Preference Shares, par value $0.01 per share Series D Preference Shares, par value $0.01 per share Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered NASDAQ Global Select Market New York Stock Exchange, Inc. New York Stock Exchange, Inc. New York Stock Exchange, Inc. Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No No No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in the definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10- K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large Accelerated Filer Non-Accelerated Filer Accelerated Filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller Reporting Company Emerging growth company If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes No The aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common shares held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2017 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was approximately $802.3 million based on the closing sale price of the registrant’s common shares on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on that date. As of February 20, 2018, 83,007,351 common shares were outstanding. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A with respect to the annual general meeting of the shareholders of the registrant scheduled to be held on May 8, 2018 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Page 2 21 40 40 41 41 42 44 46 82 84 84 84 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 86 87 E-1 F-1 S-1 Business Item 1. Item 1A. Risk Factors Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments Item 2. Properties Item 3. Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures Legal Proceedings MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Selected Financial Data Item 6. Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure Item 9. Item 9A. Controls and Procedures Item 9B. Other Information PART III Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance Item 11. Executive Compensation Item 12. Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters PART IV Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules Item 16. Form 10-K Summary Signatures Exhibits Consolidated Financial Statements Schedules to Consolidated Financial Statements i This page intentionally left blank Special Note About Forward-Looking Statements PART I Certain statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, other than purely historical information, including estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives and expected operating results and the assumptions upon which those statements are based are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These forward-looking statements include general statements both with respect to us and the insurance industry and generally are identified with the words "anticipate", "believe", "expect", "predict", "estimate", "intend", "plan", "project", "seek", "potential", "possible", "could", "might", "may", "should", "will", "would", "will be", "will continue", "will likely result" and similar expressions. In light of the risks and uncertainties inherent in all forward-looking statements, the inclusion of such statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K should not be considered as a representation by us or any other person that our objectives or plans or other matters described in any forward-looking statement will be achieved. These statements are based on current plans, estimates, assumptions and expectations. Actual results may differ materially from those projected in such forward-looking statements and therefore, you should not place undue reliance on them. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in such forward-looking statements are set forth in Item 1A "Risk Factors" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We caution that the list of important risk factors is not intended to be and is not exhaustive. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as may be required by law, and all subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or individuals acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by this paragraph. If one or more risks or uncertainties materialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, our actual results may vary materially from what we projected. Any forward- looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K reflect our current view with respect to future events and are subject to these and other risks, uncertainties and assumptions relating to our operations, results of operations, growth, strategy and liquidity. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements which speak only as of the dates of the documents in which such statements were made. References in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the terms "we","us","our","the Company" or other similar terms mean the consolidated operations of Maiden Holdings, Ltd. and our consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context requires otherwise. References in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the term "Maiden Holdings" means Maiden Holdings, Ltd. only. References in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to $ are to the lawful currency of the United States, unless otherwise indicated. Any discrepancies in the tables included herein between the amounts listed and the totals thereof are due to rounding. 1 Item 1. Business. General Overview We are a Bermuda-based holding company, primarily focused on serving the needs of regional and specialty insurers in the United States ("U.S."), Europe and select other global markets by providing innovative reinsurance solutions designed to support their capital needs. We specialize in reinsurance solutions that optimize financing and risk management by providing coverage within the more predictable and actuarially credible lower layers of coverage and/or reinsuring risks that are believed to be lower hazard, more predictable and generally not susceptible to catastrophe claims. Our tailored solutions include a variety of value added services focused on helping our clients grow and prosper. We provide reinsurance in the U.S. and Europe through our wholly owned subsidiaries, Maiden Reinsurance Ltd. ("Maiden Bermuda") and Maiden Reinsurance North America, Inc. ("Maiden US"). Internationally, we provide insurance sales and distribution services through Maiden Global Holdings, Ltd. ("Maiden Global") and its subsidiaries. Maiden Global primarily focuses on providing branded auto and credit life insurance products through insurer partners to retail clients in the European Union ("EU") and other global markets. These products also produce reinsurance programs which are underwritten by Maiden Bermuda. Certain international credit life business is written on a primary basis by Maiden Life Försäkrings AB ("Maiden LF"). Since our founding in 2007, we have entered into a series of strategic transactions, primarily in 2007, 2008 and 2010 that have significantly transformed the scope and scale of our business while maintaining our low volatility, non-catastrophe oriented risk profile. These transactions have increased our gross premiums written to an amount in excess of $2.8 billion. For additional details of our prior strategic transactions, please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10–K for the year ended December 31, 2016. We have also entered into a series of capital transactions that have enabled us to support our growing reinsurance operations while significantly enhancing our capital position to approximately $1.5 billion as at December 31, 2017 and lowering our cost of capital. The most recent capital transactions include a public offering of $150.0 million Preference Shares – Series D ("Preference Shares – Series D") in June 2017 and the redemption of our 2012 Senior Notes using a portion of the proceeds from that issuance. Further details of these and other capital transactions are discussed in the Capital Resources section of Item 7 "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" as well as the related discussion in "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 7. Long Term Debt" and "Note 13. Shareholders' Equity" included under Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this Form 10–K. Business Strategy Our goal is to leverage the competitive strengths of our organization and capital structure to generate stable long term operating returns on common equity in excess of 15%. We seek to accomplish this by becoming a premier global preferred provider of customized reinsurance and capital products and services to regional and specialty insurance companies. To achieve this goal, we have adopted the following strategies: • Dedication to Predictable and Stable Results — we execute this strategy in two ways: (1) focusing on traditional, lower volatility lines of business that are more predictable and thus, produce more stable long-term operating results and require less capital to achieve those results; and (2) placing emphasis on working layer and pro rata reinsurance participations where data is more abundant and results are more predictable; • Targeted Customer Focus — we execute this strategy by developing significant and long term reinsurance relationships with targeted regional and specialty insurance companies for which reinsurance plays a critical element of their capital structure and supporting the long term needs of these companies by providing differentiated products as well as an array of support services; and • Efficient Operating Platform — recognizing the mature nature of the reinsurance market, we are focused on maintaining operating expense ratios within the top quartile of the industry. Efficiency is a critical component of maintaining a disciplined underwriting approach. To date, despite achieving operating returns on common equity generally in excess of our industry peers, we have not yet attained our targeted returns. We believe our efficient balance sheet and low volatility business are the primary reasons our returns have generally exceeded industry averages, despite a declining investment yield environment since our founding. Our ability to achieve our targeted returns were initially impacted by a significantly higher cost of capital. Our capital management strategy in recent years has appreciably lowered our cost of capital and improved our returns on common equity. More recently, higher than targeted combined ratios have affected our underwriting profitability and limited our progress toward our objective. The Company believes that the underwriting initiatives we have implemented as well as the reserving actions taken during 2017 will enable the Company to improve its operating returns on equity in 2018 and make progress toward its long term operating return on common equity targets in the next 12 to 24 months. Our future results, and our ability to generate our targeted return on capital, may be additionally impacted by risks and trends set forth in Item 1A, "Risk Factors", and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 2 Our Principal Operating Subsidiaries Maiden Bermuda, a wholly owned subsidiary of Maiden Holdings, is a registered Class 3B Bermuda reinsurance company that began operations in June 2007. Senior management and all of the staff of Maiden Bermuda operate from and are based in our Bermuda headquarters. Maiden Holdings North America, Ltd. ("Maiden NA") is our wholly owned U.S. holding company and is domiciled in the state of Delaware. Maiden US, a wholly owned subsidiary of Maiden NA, is a licensed property and casualty insurance company domiciled in the state of Missouri. Maiden Re Insurance Services, LLC ("Maiden Re"), a wholly owned subsidiary of Maiden NA, is a limited liability company organized in the state of Delaware in January 2008. Maiden Re operates as a managing general agent and underwriter for Maiden US. Maiden Global, a wholly owned subsidiary of Maiden Holdings, operates as a reinsurance services and holding company. Maiden Global is organized under the laws of England and Wales. AVS Automotive VersicherungsService GmbH ("AVS"), organized under the laws of Germany, operates as an insurance producer in Germany and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Maiden Global. Maiden LF and Maiden General Försäkrings AB ("Maiden GF"), both wholly owned subsidiaries of Maiden Holdings, are insurance companies organized under the laws of Sweden and write credit life insurance and general insurance, respectively, on a primary basis in support of Maiden Global’s business development efforts. Our Reportable Segments Our business consists of two reportable segments: Diversified Reinsurance and AmTrust Reinsurance. Our Diversified Reinsurance segment consists of a portfolio of predominantly property and casualty reinsurance business focusing on regional and specialty property and casualty insurance companies located, primarily in the U.S. and Europe. Our AmTrust Reinsurance segment includes all business ceded by AmTrust to Maiden Bermuda, primarily the AmTrust Quota Share and the European Hospital Liability Quota Share. In addition to our reportable segments, the results of operations of the former NGHC Quota Share segment and the remnants of the U.S. excess and surplus ("E&S") business have been separated and included in a category captioned "Other". Financial data relating to our two segments is included in Item 7. "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and in "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 3. Segment Information" included under Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this Form 10-K. The tables below compare net premiums written and earned, by reportable segment, reconciled to the total consolidated net premiums written and earned for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015: For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 ($ in thousands) Diversified Reinsurance AmTrust Reinsurance Total - reportable segments Other Total Net Premiums Written % of Total Net Premiums Written % of Total Net Premiums Written $ 807,362 29.2 % $ 766,119 28.9% $ 734,781 1,954,856 2,762,218 70.8 % 1,888,428 71.1% 1,779,334 100.0 % 2,654,547 100.0% 2,514,115 100.0% (230) — % 405 —% 1 —% $ 2,761,988 100.0 % $ 2,654,952 100.0% $ 2,514,116 100.0% % of Total 29.2% 70.8% For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 ($ in thousands) Diversified Reinsurance AmTrust Reinsurance Total - reportable segments Other Total Net Premiums Earned % of Total Net Premiums Earned % of Total Net Premiums Earned $ 823,365 30.1 % $ 724,124 28.2% $ 744,875 1,909,644 2,733,009 69.9 % 1,843,621 71.8% 1,684,191 100.0 % 2,567,745 100.0% 2,429,066 100.0% (230) — % 405 —% 3 —% $ 2,732,779 100.0 % $ 2,568,150 100.0% $ 2,429,069 100.0% % of Total 30.7% 69.3% Financial data relating to the geographical areas in which we operate and relating to our principal products may be found in "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 3. Segment Information" included under Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this Form 10-K. In a quota share reinsurance arrangement (also known as pro-rata reinsurance, proportional reinsurance or participating reinsurance), the reinsurer shares a proportional part of the original premiums of the reinsured. In return, the reinsurer assumes a proportional share of the losses incurred by the cedant. The reinsurer pays the company a ceding commission, which is generally based on the ceding company’s cost of acquiring the business being reinsured (including broker commissions, premium taxes, assessments and miscellaneous administrative expenses) and may also include a profit sharing arrangement. Under quota share 3 arrangements, ceding commission can be adjustable and subject to minimum and maximum levels based upon loss experience which potentially reduces earnings volatility for the reinsurer under such arrangements. Excess of loss (or non-proportional) reinsurance indemnifies the reinsured against all or a specified portion of losses on underlying insurance policies in excess of a specified amount, which is called a level, retention or attachment point. Excess of loss business is written in layers and a reinsurer or group of reinsurers accepts a band of coverage up to a specified amount. Facultative reinsurance (proportional or non-proportional) is the reinsurance of individual risks. The reinsurer separately rates and underwrites each risk rather than assuming all or a portion of a class of risks as in the case of treaty reinsurance. Nearly all of our gross premiums written is generated by quota share reinsurance contracts. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, 92.8%, 92.3% and 91.0%, respectively, of our consolidated gross premiums written were derived from quota share reinsurance contracts. This significant concentration of quota share reinsurance, combined with our focus on lines of business which are inherently less volatile, results in a less capital intensive business which enables the Company to target higher returns on equity for its shareholders. Diversified Reinsurance Segment General Maiden US writes treaties, on a quota share or excess of loss basis, and facultative risks, marketed through third-party intermediaries and on a direct basis. Maiden Bermuda writes treaties on both a quota share basis and excess of loss basis outside the U.S. and also provides quota share reinsurance support to Maiden US through an intercompany reinsurance arrangement. The net premiums written by our Diversified Reinsurance segment's operating subsidiaries, after intercompany reinsurance, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 were as follows: For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 ($ in thousands) Maiden US Maiden Bermuda Maiden LF Maiden GF Total Net Premiums Written % of Total Net Premiums Written % of Total Net Premiums Written % of Total $ 468,430 58.0% $ 436,469 57.0% $ 416,427 335,254 41.5% 324,705 42.4% 312,375 3,615 63 0.5% —% 4,945 — 0.6% —% 5,979 — 56.7% 42.5% 0.8% —% $ 807,362 100.0% $ 766,119 100.0% $ 734,781 100.0% The Company entered into a retrocessional quota share agreement with a highly rated global insurer effective January 1, 2015 which impacted net premiums written in 2017, 2016 and 2015. Net premiums written in 2017 increased from 2016 due to the reduction in the utilization of retrocessional capacity of $33,319. A combination of general market and competitive conditions, along with their underlying financial performance and capital levels including those considered by rating agencies and regulators, often influence reinsurance purchasing decisions of individual ceding companies. Historically, Maiden US has written greater amounts of quota share business than excess of loss business reflecting the needs of its clients. Please refer to Item 7. "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for a discussion on the performance of our Diversified Reinsurance segment, of which Maiden US is the most significant component, for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. Maiden US began operating in 1983 through Maiden Re and since its inception, the business has focused on developing a portfolio of assumed reinsurance with an emphasis on relatively predictable reinsurance with low limits of participation on both a treaty and facultative basis. Our underwriting strategy has de-emphasized property catastrophe reinsurance and participations in more volatile U.S. casualty lines such as Directors and Officers and Professional Liability. Regional and specialty oriented property and casualty treaty reinsurance business represents the bulk of the portfolio, but accident and health and facultative are also important product offerings. In recent years, we have added enhanced automation to the facultative platform and we have added turn-key Umbrella Liability and Equipment Breakdown and Service Line product offerings for our core regional customers. We employ sophisticated risk management, disciplined actuarially-based pricing and strong technical underwriting in developing and maintaining these portfolios. We use both proprietary and vendor developed technology systems to administer and manage the portfolio. The business has been carefully developed under the active management of multi-functional underwriting teams with performance accountability. For most U.S. clients, we provide enhanced security in the form of an internally developed dedicated trust agreement for the reinsurance balances payable to that client. We believe this reinsurance security provides us with a sustainable competitive advantage that is both attractive to new clients and improves retention of existing ones. The trust accounts are funded on an individual client basis with cash and other fixed maturity securities. We can actively manage the cash and investments in the trust accounts and the interest earned is ours. The balances are adjusted regularly to correspond to the liabilities owed to the client, including individually computed Incurred But Not Reported ("IBNR") reserves. Our clients can withdraw assets from the trusts under contractually limited circumstances. At December 31, 2017, we had cash and fixed maturity securities totaling $1.1 billion in these trusts, which is part of the $4.9 billion restricted assets disclosed in "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 4. Investments" included under Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this Form 10-K. 4 Since the advent of Solvency II in Europe in 2016 and other similar risk–based capital regimes globally, demand for reinsurance and other related products by insurers to support their capital has increased. Maiden Bermuda has focused on developing a portfolio of assumed reinsurance in Europe and globally with a strategic focus and risk profile similar to Maiden US. Maiden Bermuda has also enhanced its ability to develop this business by offering additional products that support insurers regulatory capital. Maiden Bermuda began writing treaty reinsurance contracts under this initiative in 2016 and continues to grow this business on a pan– European basis as insurers deploy more active capital management strategies in response to these rules. Additionally, Maiden Global’s business development teams partner with automobile manufacturers, dealer associations and local primary insurers to design and implement point of sale insurance programs which generate revenue for the auto manufacturer and insurance premiums for the primary insurer ("IIS business"). Typically, the primary insurer agrees to reinsure an agreed upon percentage of the underlying business to Maiden Bermuda as part of the overall arrangement. Maiden Bermuda is generally not obligated to underwrite the original equipment automobile manufacturers' (the "OEM's") programs that Maiden Global designs. Net premiums written for the IIS business were written in the following countries: For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 ($ in thousands) Germany Australia United Kingdom Canada France All other Total Net Premiums Written % of Total Net Premiums Written $ 40,070 14,277 7,443 6,328 749 72 % of Total 58.1% $ 20.7% 10.8% 9.2% 1.1% 0.1% Net Premiums Written 34,127 12,989 13,873 5,555 1,288 1,774 % of Total 49.0% $ 18.7% 19.9% 8.0% 1.9% 2.5% 35,004 10,251 12,489 5,598 2,074 8,699 $ 68,939 100.0% $ 69,606 100.0% $ 74,115 47.2% 13.8% 16.9% 7.6% 2.8% 11.7% 100.0% The breakdown of IIS business by line of business was as follows: For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 ($ in thousands) Personal Auto Credit Life Total Net Premiums Written $ $ 58,918 10,021 68,939 % of Total Net Premiums Written % of Total Net Premiums Written 85.5% $ 57,809 83.1% $ 61,567 14.5% 11,797 16.9% 12,548 % of Total 83.1% 16.9% 100.0% $ 69,606 100.0% $ 74,115 100.0% We also generate fee income when Maiden Global participates in transactions and collects a fee for designing and facilitating the sale of insurance programs. Our fee income is primarily generated by AVS in Germany through its point of sale producers in select OEM's dealerships. We seek to expand these fee generating arrangements through the Maiden Global business development teams' contacts with automobile manufacturers globally. For the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the fee income was earned in the following locations: For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 ($ in thousands) Germany United Kingdom Austria Australia Other Total Strategy Fee Income 6,852 $ % of Total Fee Income 7,126 69.9% $ % of Total Fee Income 8,874 65.9% $ 1,437 14.7% 1,397 681 449 383 6.9% 4.6% 3.9% 666 809 819 12.9% 6.1% 7.5% 7.6% 310 630 836 862 % of Total 77.1% 2.7% 5.5% 7.3% 7.4% $ 9,802 100.0% $ 10,817 100.0% $ 11,512 100.0% Maiden Bermuda and Maiden US are specialty reinsurers with an efficient operating platform that target lines of business and types of contracts that are more predictable than the market as a whole, allowing stability of earnings over time. Most business is written as reinsurance which is insurance of other insurance companies. We offer reinsurance on both a quota share and excess of loss basis. Our primary focus is regional and specialty clients who rely on reinsurance for capital support and/or to reduce their risk. The majority of our clients are regional or super-regional insurance companies or specialty insurers. With these customers, we believe it is possible to develop long term relationships which not only survive insurance market cycles, but provide benefits to both reinsurer and customer during turbulent times. We also utilize a partnership concept developed over Maiden Re's thirty 5 five year operating history to develop long-term customer relationships. This concept entails the offer to our clients of our expertise in underwriting, claims, actuarial, marketing and accounting, through tailored services which support their businesses and goals. In our Diversified Reinsurance segment, we reinsure property and casualty lines of business, but de-emphasize lines of business which we consider more volatile, and we do not offer traditional catastrophe reinsurance on a stand-alone basis. We occasionally provide limited catastrophe coverage to clients that purchase other reinsurance from us. We are primarily a lead reinsurer in the U.S., meaning that we develop our own terms rather than accepting a small share of another reinsurer’s program in a subscription market. We prefer to be the primary, if not sole, reinsurer for our clients. Our pricing and underwriting of this business considers the economics of the individual customer and therefore is less susceptible to large increases and decreases following market cycles. We are able to attract preferred clients because we offer a secure product and give emphasis on client service. By maintaining significant relationships with clients, we are able to develop strong economies of scale and maintain highly competitive operating efficiencies, a critical element of our business strategy. We believe that our policy of providing our clients security for our reinsurance obligations through collateral trusts gives us a competitive advantage. In the current economic climate, we also believe that reinsurance brokers and insurers, as well as rating agencies, are scrutinizing the credit-worthiness of reinsurers more closely than in the recent past and recognize that our collateral trust product offers a high level of security. AmTrust Reinsurance Segment General AmTrust is our largest client and is a multinational specialty property and casualty insurance holding company with operations in the U.S., Europe and Bermuda. Michael Karfunkel, George Karfunkel and Barry Zyskind were our Founding Shareholders. Michael Karfunkel passed away on April 27, 2016, and his shares are now controlled by his wife, Leah Karfunkel. Leah Karfunkel and George Karfunkel are directors of AmTrust, and Barry Zyskind is the president, chief executive officer and chairman of AmTrust. Leah Karfunkel, George Karfunkel and Barry Zyskind own or control approximately 42.7% of the outstanding voting shares of AmTrust. Through our reinsurance agreements with AmTrust, we reinsure specific lines of business within the following AmTrust business segments: • Small commercial business insurance, which includes U.S. workers’ compensation, commercial package and other low- hazard property and casualty insurance products; • Specialty risk and extended warranty coverage for consumer and commercial goods and custom designed coverages, such as accidental damage plans and payment protection plans offered in connection with the sale of consumer and commercial goods, in the U.S., United Kingdom ("U.K.") and certain other global markets, European Hospital Liability; and • Specialty program which includes package products, general liability, commercial auto liability, excess and surplus lines programs and other specialty commercial property and casualty insurance to a narrowly defined, homogeneous group of small and middle market companies. Reinsurance Agreement Under our Reinsurance Agreement with AmTrust’s Bermuda reinsurance subsidiary, AII, effective July 1, 2007, we reinsure 40% of AmTrust’s written premium, net of reinsurance with unaffiliated reinsurers, relating to all lines of business that existed on the effective date. We also have the option to reinsure additional programs, in addition to the original lines of business entered into by AmTrust since the effective date of the Reinsurance Agreement. As AmTrust has expanded into new lines of business, pursuant to the terms of the Reinsurance Agreement, we have selectively added some of those lines and opted not to participate in others. Consequently our share of AmTrust's overall gross premiums written has declined below 40% over time. Maiden and AII entered into an agreement to commute certain lines of business as of December 31, 2015. The commuted reserve value of $107.0 million represents full and final settlement of all liabilities related to this business and as a result of this agreement, this business is excluded. European Hospital Liability Quota Share On April 1, 2011, Maiden Bermuda entered into the European Hospital Liability Quota Share with AmTrust Europe Limited ("AEL") and AmTrust International Underwriters Limited ("AIUL"), respectively, to cover those entities' medical liability business in Europe, in particular, Italy and France. Maiden Bermuda pays a ceding commission of 5.0%. Effective January 1, 2012, the Company's maximum limit of liability is 40% of €10 million, previously 40% of €5 million, per original claim for any one original policy. Effective July 1, 2016, the contract was further amended such that Maiden Bermuda assumes from AEL 32.5% of the premiums and losses of all policies written or renewed on or after July 1, 2016 until June 30, 2017 and 20% of all policies written or renewed on or after July 1, 2017. The European Hospital Liability Quota Share has a term of one year and automatically renews for further one year terms thereafter, unless either party notifies the other of its election in writing not to renew not less than four months prior to the end of any such term. The agreement has been renewed through March 31, 2019. For more information, please refer to "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 10. Related Party Transactions" included under Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this Form 10-K. 6 Risk Management General Central to the reinsurance business is the assumption and management of risk. Our risk management discipline therefore focuses on both quantitative and qualitative elements as the means to reduce volatility of shareholder returns and preserve capital through a balanced analysis and assessment of these elements. The quantitative aspect of our risk management practice focuses on understanding and controlling a broad array of risk parameters in order to achieve desired returns. Our business model further mitigates the risk inherent in our business by focusing on lines of business which are less volatile and thus, require less capital to support the exposures generated by those lines of business. The qualitative aspect of our risk management practice focuses on identifying and assessing risks, and taking the necessary steps to reduce or mitigate risks that could threaten the achievement of our business objectives. We have a strong risk management culture set by the tone at the top, which is then established entity wide through various processes and controls which focus on our risk exposures. We continually develop, review, and enhance these processes which we believe to be necessary to achieve our business strategies and objectives within our risk management practice. Our Enterprise Risk Management ("ERM") Committee monitors and oversees the risk environment and provides direction to mitigate, to an acceptable level, the most significant and material risks that may adversely affect the Company’s ability to achieve its goals. The Committee facilitates a culture of continuous improvement of the Company’s capabilities around managing its strategic risks. The ERM Committee establishes appropriate risk parameters and tolerances, performs risk assessments, continually reviews factors that may impact our organizational risk and develops and implements strategies and action plans to mitigate key risks. The Chief Risk Officer ("CRO") is responsible for the global oversight, monitoring and effective governance of significant risks of the group. As the Lead of our ERM Committee, the CRO facilitates and drives committee engagement and responsiveness toward identification of current and potential risks and risk management processes. Our ERM program is designed to achieve the following: • Establish a process to assess strategies and business decisions on a risk/reward basis; • Establish a risk governance structure with clearly defined roles and responsibilities; • Identify and assess all material risks from internal and external sources; • Manage risks within our risk appetite; and • Effective review and reporting of major loss events. Specific risk management practices that have been or are being developed to meet our risk management goals include: • Scenario/stress testing to assess the level of a specific risk and mitigation effects; • Setting risk tolerances that we use to monitor and limit risk; • Tracking expected portfolio volatility over time; • Identifying risk mitigation opportunities and implementing them as appropriate; • Understanding the capital required to support the underwriting portfolio and individual contracts; • Monitoring and managing exposure by line of business and geographic concentration; • Monitoring and limiting catastrophe aggregates and concentrations; • Monitoring and limiting terrorism aggregates and concentrations; • Monitoring and managing operational risks across the organization; • Monitoring and managing our exposure to cyber threats; and • Identifying, monitoring and managing emerging risks as they develop. Our ERM framework reflects the ‘three lines of defense’ approach to risk management, which involves (1) risk owners having responsibility for identifying and managing risks; (2) the ERM Committee providing global tools and policies; and (3) internal audit performing independent reviews. Maiden Holdings' Board of Directors has overall responsibility for oversight of the ERM program and has delegated this oversight to the Audit Committee. There is involvement from all our employees and risk owners are required to assist with the identification of risks, creation of appropriate responses to risks, and maintain them within the risk appetite and tolerances that the ERM Committee believes are necessary to achieve our business strategies and objectives. The impact and assessment of key risks are recorded in a risk register with an assigned risk owner. It is the responsibility of that individual to periodically assess the impact of the risk and to ensure appropriate risk mitigation and controls are in place. Additionally, an annual risk assessment is completed by internal audit through interviews and questionnaires with business level risk owners and senior management. On an annual basis, the ERM Committee reviews the risk assessments and ensures we are operating within accepted risk tolerances. The mitigation of risks is achieved through the application and operation of controls, transferring of risk or tolerating risks within risk appetite. The ERM Committee focuses primarily on identifying interactions among our primary categories of risk, developing metrics to assess our overall risk appetite, establishing appropriate risk parameters and tolerances, monitoring those tolerances, establishing and determining actions, if deemed necessary, in the event of a tolerance breach, performing ongoing risk assessment and continually reviewing factors that may impact our organizational risk. Quarterly, the output of the ERM Committee is reported to the Audit 7 Committee of the Board. In addition to its oversight role, the ERM Committee examines specific topics and emerging risks including: • Autonomous vehicles, home-sharing and ride-sharing; • Cloud computing; • Silent cyber risk exposures in reinsurance contracts; and • Cybersecurity in an environment of increasing sophistication of cyber-crimes and increasing frequency in the type and number of cyber related breaches, attempts, attacks and intrusions. Our internal audit department assesses the adequacy and effectiveness of our risk management framework and mitigating controls and coordinates risk-based audits to evaluate and address risk within targeted areas of our business. The core functions of this department are to (1) assess the adequacy and effectiveness of our internal control systems; (2) coordinate risk-based audits and compliance reviews; and (3) carry out other initiatives to evaluate and address risk within targeted areas of our business. Internal audit integrates testing of the risk management framework into its annual test plans. Our ERM is dynamic and constantly evolving to reflect changes to our organizational processes, global economic environment as well as implementing the latest industry standards. Our Audit Committee, comprised solely of independent directors, meets quarterly and assesses whether management is addressing risk issues in a timely and appropriate manner. The Audit Committee receives a quarterly report on capital and risk management. Our risk appetite and tolerances have been formally approved by the Audit Committee. Maiden is operating within approved risk appetite and tolerances. Our Audit Committee also reviews the Group Solvency Self-Assessment ("GSSA") which is required to be filed with the Bermuda Monetary Authority ("BMA") and used to understand current and prospective risks and the associated capital requirements. The GSSA is an integral part of our risk management framework and reflects our risk tolerance and overall business strategy. The GSSA documents our internal self-assessment of capital which is determined using our internal model. Our internal model quantifies the level of capital needed to meet our liabilities within our specified confidence level. On a group basis and for our operating entities, we monitor our capital position relative to our internal requirements, rating agency thresholds and regulatory requirements. Our major risks are insurance related - both premium risk and reserve risk, reflecting the possibility that our pricing may be too low or our reserving levels may not be sufficient. Other primary risk exposure areas are investment risk, credit risk and operational risk. Internal controls and ERM can provide a reasonable but not absolute assurance that our control objectives will be met. The possibility of material financial loss remains in spite of our ERM efforts. Insurance Risk The key risks for us due to the nature of our business relate to insurance activities. Insurance risk is comprised of underwriting risk, catastrophe risk and reserving risk. 1. Underwriting Risk While the overwhelming majority of Maiden’s underwriting portfolio is low volatility, material deviation of performance from expected is a key risk. Specific risks that could unfavorably affect Maiden’s performance and erode capital include: • Insufficient premiums to cover future incurred losses due to inaccurate pricing, inappropriate risk selection, or both; • Pressure on prices due to place in insurance cycle, the inability to renew existing accounts or write new accounts at appropriate pricing; • Acceptance of risks outside of Maiden’s risk appetite, underwriting guidelines or deviation from prescribed pricing targets could deliver results with different performance or volatility than expected; • Changes in loss cost trends which are observed after contract pricing; • Changes in cedant claims handling or underwriting procedures which mask actual cedant performance; and • Losses from terrorism events may exceed our expectations. Internal underwriting controls are established by our underwriting executives. Underwriting authority is delegated to the managers in each business segment to underwrite in accordance with prudent practice and an understanding of each underwriter’s capabilities. In accordance with our underwriting guidelines, underwriting authorities are delegated to underwriting teams as well as individual underwriters. Our targeted performance goals and guidelines are regularly reviewed by management to reflect changes in market conditions, interest rates, capital requirements and market-expected returns. We have a disciplined approach to underwriting and risk management that relies heavily upon the collective underwriting expertise of our management and staff. This expertise is in turn guided by the following underwriting principles: • we will underwrite and accept only those risks we know and understand; • we will perform our own independent pricing and risk review on all risks we accept; and • we will accept only those risks that are expected to earn an appropriate risk-adjusted return on capital. Before developing a reinsurance proposal, we consider the appropriateness of the client, including the quality of its management, its financial stability and its risk management strategy. In addition, we require each program to include significant information on the nature of the perils to be included and detailed exposure and loss information, including rate changes and changes in underwriting and claims handling guidelines over time. Whenever possible, we conduct an on-site audit of the client’s operations prior to quoting. If the customer and business meets our underwriting criteria, we then develop a proposal which contemplates the prospective client’s needs, that account’s risk/reward profile, as well as our corporate risk objectives. We have fully integrated our internal 8 claims, underwriting and actuarial pricing staff into the underwriting and decision making process. We use in-depth actuarial, claims and exposure analyses to evaluate contracts prior to quoting. We underwrite and accept property and casualty reinsurance business, accident and health reinsurance business and credit life insurance business. In general, we underwrite reinsurance business that historically is lower in volatility and more predictable than other classes of reinsurance business such as catastrophe reinsurance, which we generally avoid. As part of our risk management process, we track exposures that we believe are most likely to deliver excessive accumulations to a particular type of event. In addition to the above technical and analytical practices, our underwriters use a variety of means, including specific contract terms, to manage our exposure to loss. Specific terms include occurrence limits, adjustable ceding commissions and premiums, aggregate limits, reinstatement provisions and other loss sensitive features. Additionally, our underwriters use appropriate exclusions, terms and conditions to further eliminate or reduce particular risks or exposures that our underwriting teams deem to be outside of the intent of the coverage we are willing to offer. In limited cases, the risks assumed by us are partially reinsured with other third party reinsurers. Reinsurance ceded varies by segment and line of business based on a number of factors, including market conditions. The benefits of ceding risks include reducing exposure on individual risks and/or enhancing our capital position. Reinsurance ceded does not relieve the Company of its obligations to the policyholders. We remain liable to the extent that any reinsurance company fails to meet its obligations. In the event that one or more of the reinsurers are unable to meet their obligations under these reinsurance agreements, we would not realize the full value of the reinsurance recoverable balances. We use retrocessional agreements to mitigate volatility and to reduce our exposure on certain reinsurance risks and to provide capital support. We remain liable to our cedants to the extent that the retrocessionaires do not meet their obligations under retrocessional agreements, so we retain credit risk in all cases and to aggregate loss limits in certain cases. We maintain a credit risk review process that identifies authorized acceptable reinsurers and retrocessionaires and have no impaired balances. At December 31, 2017, we had approximately $117.6 million (2016 - $99.9 million) of reinsurance recoverable under such agreements, of which $45.8 million or 39.0% (2016 - $23.8 million or 23.8%) relates to reinsurance claims from Superstorm Sandy. 2. Catastrophe Risk While we do not write catastrophe reinsurance contracts, certain risks we reinsure are exposed to catastrophic loss events. Maiden aims to limit the probable maximum loss ("PML") of capital and income from a single event and from multiple events in any one year. Our internal tolerance is that our modeled one-in-250 year return period catastrophe occurrence loss (single event) must be less than 50% of our planned operating income and our modelled annual aggregate loss (multiple events) must be less than 75% of our planned operating income. At December 31, 2017, our one-in-250 year catastrophe exposure on a per occurrence and aggregate basis is $32.7 million (2016 - $41.1 million) and $77.8 million (2016 - $87.2 million), respectively, within these stated tolerances. To achieve our catastrophe risk management objectives, we utilize commercially available modeling tools to quantify and monitor the various risks we accept. We have licensed catastrophe modeling software from one of the principal modeling firms, Applied Insurance Research ("AIR"). These software tools use exposure data provided by our ceding company clients to simulate catastrophic losses and develop PML estimates. We take an active role in the evaluation of these commercial catastrophe models, providing feedback to AIR to improve the efficiencies and accuracy of their models. We use modeling not only for the underwriting of individual transactions but also to optimize the total return and risk of our underwriting portfolio. We have high standards for the quality and levels of detailed exposure data provided by our clients and have an expressed preference for the most detailed location information available, including data at the zip code or postal code level or finer. Data output from the software described above is incorporated into our proprietary pricing models. Our proprietary systems include those for modeling risks associated with property catastrophe, property and U.S. workers’ compensation business, various casualty and specialty pricing models. These systems allow us to monitor our pricing and risk on a contract by contract basis in each of our segments and business lines. 3. Reserving Risk Reserving risk is the risk that loss and loss adjustment expense ("loss and LAE") reserves are not sufficient to cover all of our policy obligations. Drivers include reporting lags inherent in reinsurance relationships, compounded by third party administrator lags in reporting to insurers, adequacy of ceding company’ claim estimates, future trends, unanticipated events, and normal volatility causing a range of uncertainty around where ultimate loss will land when all claims are closed and settled. Reserving risk includes potential time delays in being aware of significant developments or reserve deterioration from ceding companies. Any inaccurate assumptions used in the selection of the expected loss ratio, whether they be due to fluctuations in the timing, frequency and severity of claims and claim settlements relative to expectations, loss and exposure trends or underlying client pricing, could cause our initial reserve selections to be incorrect as the pricing expected loss ratio is used as the Expected Loss Ratio in our reserving process. We are primarily a frequency related reinsurer, and our risk is less related to swings in more volatile severity coverages. Establishing adequate reserves for loss and LAE constitutes a significant risk for us. We manage the risk inherent in estimating the Company’s loss reserves in a variety of ways. Reserve reviews are performed on a quarterly basis by credentialed actuaries. As part of the reserving process, observations from the review are discussed with the production teams individually to allow for the discussion of account specific information that may be obtained by those managing the business. The reserves are reviewed and approved by a reserve committee. Loss provisions are reviewed and approved by senior management at the recommendation of reserving committees. The Company conducts operational and claims audits of ceding companies on a regular basis. Our reserving process has been built to deliver the most accurate estimate possible based on the information available at the time. Maiden maintains a rigorous reserving process, reviewing the reserves of each account quarterly. The frequency and depth of this process strengthens the quality of the reserve estimates and allows adjustments to be made quickly. Further details on how we manage the risk inherent in estimating our loss reserves are set out later in Item 1. "Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses." 9 Investment Risk Management Investment risk includes the risk of loss in our investment portfolio potentially caused by fluctuations in interest rates, credit spreads, foreign exchange rates and inflation on both assets and liabilities. At December 31, 2017, Maiden’s investment portfolio of $5.1 billion consisted almost entirely of fixed income securities. Our investment policy is an important component of our overall business model and is designed to preserve capital, provide significant liquidity, and produce sufficient investment income to sustain and grow net income while supporting our client’s needs. In order to limit our credit risk exposure, the investment policy is to invest almost exclusively in high grade marketable fixed income securities, cash and cash equivalents and to achieve diversification through limits on holdings of individual securities. We monitor and manage exposure to asset types and economic sector. We manage interest rate risk by establishing and managing targets in the investment portfolio for duration, yield, and currency that support our reinsurance liabilities. Foreign exchange risks are managed by holding cash and investments in foreign currencies where we have reinsurance liabilities that will be paid in those currencies. We are exposed to nominal equity risk and have a very limited equity portfolio. We perform stress testing of the investment portfolio using stochastic scenarios to evaluate the investment portfolio risk and capital needs. Investment risk includes liquidity risk, including the risk that the group does not have sufficient liquid funds to pay losses as they become due. While our low volatility business model, combined with our very strong cash flow, leaves us less susceptible to events which require immediate access to funds, the inherent nature of insurance claims is such that unanticipated significant claims activity under our reinsurance policies, outside our historical experience, could potentially impact our liquidity at any time. We mitigate this risk by maintaining a portfolio of highly liquid fixed income securities in our available-for-sale ("AFS") portfolio and by keeping the duration of our assets reasonably close to the duration of our liabilities. Operational Risk Management Operational Risk includes the risk of loss from inadequate or failed internal processes, people, systems and/or external events. Operational risk also includes legal risks. These types of operational failures could negatively impact our reputation with customers, agents and brokers, shareholders, and regulators. The ERM Committee in collaboration with individual business units and risk owners are responsible for the identification, measurement, monitoring and reporting of operational risks. Operational risks are mitigated through strong process controls, training and business continuity planning. Competition The reinsurance industry is mature and highly competitive. Reinsurance companies compete on the basis of many factors, including premium rates, company and underwriter relationships, general reputation and perceived financial strength, the terms and conditions of the products offered, ratings assigned by independent rating agencies, speed of claims payments, reputation and experience in risks underwritten, capacity and coverages offered and various other factors. These factors operate at the individual market participant level and generally in the aggregate across the reinsurance industry. In addition, underlying economic conditions and variations in the reinsurance buying practices of ceding companies, by participant and in the aggregate, contribute to cyclical movements in rates, terms and conditions and may impact industry aggregate results and subsequently the level of completion in the reinsurance industry. Both Maiden US and Maiden Bermuda compete with a wide variety of major reinsurers including those based in Bermuda. In our Diversified Reinsurance segment, we compete with reinsurers that provide property and casualty-based lines of reinsurance such as: General Reinsurance Corporation, Hannover Re Group, Munich Reinsurance America, Inc., PartnerRe Ltd., Swiss Reinsurance Company Ltd., Axis Capital Holdings Ltd., Arch Capital Group Ltd., and Transatlantic Reinsurance Company. Many of these entities have significantly more capital, higher ratings from rating agencies and more employees than we do; in addition, these entities have established long-term and continuing business relationships throughout the industry, which can be significant competitive advantages. However, we believe the enhanced security that we offer our clients through collateral trusts, our niche specialist orientation, our operating efficiency and our careful relationship management capabilities help offset these advantages and allow us to effectively compete for profitable business. In addition, in recent years, significant increases in the use of risk-linked securities and derivative and other non-traditional risk transfer mechanisms and vehicles are being developed and offered by other parties, including entities other than insurance and reinsurance companies. The availability of both these non-traditional products and sources of capital could reduce the demand for traditional insurance and reinsurance. More recently, January 1, 2018 reinsurance renewals show competitive pricing conditions. While these conditions have been most pronounced in severity related placements, particularly in property catastrophe contracts which are more acutely feeling the impact of capital inflows, we see continued competition in our higher frequency/lower severity business as well. While the business we write as part of our business model is somewhat more insulated from these competitive conditions, we are experiencing some pricing pressures as a result of broader industry conditions. Property catastrophe pricing continues to be at the mercy of the alternative capital market and is not as heavily influenced by the traditional reinsurance market as historically has been the case. Therefore any near-term market improvement due to substantial insured industry losses from catastrophes incurred in the third quarter of 2017 may be relatively short-lived given the current level of excess capacity in the overall market. As market conditions continue to develop, we continue to maintain our adherence to disciplined underwriting by declining business when pricing terms and conditions do not meet our underwriting standards. We believe that we are well positioned to take advantage of market conditions should the pricing environment become more favorable. Our Financial Strength Ratings Ratings are an important factor in establishing the competitive position of insurance and reinsurance companies and are important to our ability to market and sell our products. We believe that the primary users of such ratings include brokers, ceding companies and investors. Periodically, rating agencies evaluate us to confirm that we continue to meet their criteria for the ratings 10 assigned to us by them. A.M. Best has developed a rating system to provide an opinion of an insurer’s or reinsurer’s financial strength and ability to meet ongoing obligations to its policyholders. Each rating reflects that rating agency’s independent opinion of the capitalization, management and sponsorship of the entity to which it relates, and is neither an evaluation directed to investors in our common shares nor a recommendation to buy, sell or hold our common shares. A.M. Best maintains a letter scale rating system ranging from "A++" (Superior) to "F" (In Liquidation). Our subsidiaries, Maiden Bermuda and Maiden US, each currently has a financial strength rating of "A" (Excellent, the third highest out of sixteen rating levels) with a stable outlook from A.M. Best. Distribution of Our Reinsurance Products We market our Diversified Reinsurance segment through third party intermediaries, as well as directly through our own marketing efforts. Our direct marketing activities are generally focused on insurers with a demonstrated preference and propensity to utilize direct distribution reinsurers. We believe this combination affords us flexibility and efficiency. In the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, the sources of gross premiums written in our Diversified Reinsurance segment were as follows: % of Gross Premiums Written for the Year Ended December 31, Broker Aon Benfield Inc. Marsh & McLennan Companies (including Guy Carpenter) Risk & Insurance Services Consulting, LLC Beach and Associates, Ltd. All other brokers Total broker Direct Total 2017 2016 2015 13.9% 11.6% 6.4% 5.9% 12.9% 50.7% 49.3% 13.8% 11.9% 4.8% 8.9% 14.5% 53.9% 46.1% 17.3% 12.2% 4.6% 1.4% 19.1% 54.6% 45.4% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% In the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, our top three brokers represented approximately 31.9%, 34.6% and 36.9%, respectively, of gross premiums written in our Diversified Reinsurance segment. Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses General We are required by applicable insurance laws and regulations in Bermuda, the U.S., Sweden and by U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("U.S. GAAP") to establish loss reserves to cover our estimated liability for the payment of all loss and LAE incurred with respect to premiums earned on the policies and treaties that we write. These reserves are balance sheet liabilities representing estimates of loss and LAE which we are ultimately required to pay for insured or reinsured claims that have occurred as of or before the balance sheet date. The loss and LAE reserves on our balance sheet represent management’s best estimate of the outstanding liabilities associated with our premium earned. In developing this estimate, management considers the results of internal and external actuarial analyses, trends in those analyses as well as industry trends. Our opining independent actuary certifies that the reserves established by management make a reasonable provision for our unpaid loss and LAE obligations. These amounts include case reserves and provisions for IBNR reserves. Case reserves are established for losses that have been reported to us, and not yet paid. IBNR reserves represent the estimated cost of losses that have occurred but have not been reported to us and include a provision for additional development on case reserves. We establish case reserves based on information from the ceding company, reinsurance intermediaries, and when appropriate, consultations with independent legal counsel. The IBNR reserves are established by management based on reported loss and LAE and actuarially determined estimates of ultimate loss and LAE. A variety of standard actuarial methods are calculated to estimate ultimate loss and LAE. The majority of our business is reserved individually by cedant and line of business, with the remainder reserved in homogeneous groupings. Ultimate loss selections are accumulated across the reserve segments, and appropriate actuarial judgment is applied to determine the final selection of estimated ultimate losses. Ultimate losses are converted to IBNR reserves by subtracting inception to date paid losses and case reserves from those amounts. The combined total of case and IBNR results in indicated reserves which are the basis for the carried reserves for financial statements. Ultimate losses are also used to estimate premium and commission accruals for accounts with adjustable features. Loss reserves do not represent an exact calculation of liability; rather, loss reserves are estimates of what we expect the ultimate resolution and administration of claims will cost. These estimates are based on actuarial and statistical projections and on our assessment of currently available data, as well as estimates of trends in claims severity and frequency, judicial theories of liability and other factors. Loss reserve estimates are refined as experience develops and as claims are reported and resolved. Establishing an appropriate level of loss reserves is an inherently uncertain process. In addition, the relatively long reporting periods between when a loss occurs and when it may be reported to our claims department for our casualty lines of business also increase the uncertainties of our reserve estimates in such lines. To assist us in establishing appropriate reserves for loss and LAE, we analyze a significant amount of internal data and external insurance industry information with respect to the pricing environment and loss settlement patterns. In combination with our individual account pricing analyses and our internal loss settlement patterns, this 11 industry information is used to guide our loss and LAE estimates. These estimates are reviewed quarterly, at a high level of detail, and any adjustments are reflected in earnings in the periods in which they are determined. For additional information concerning our reserves, see Item 7,"Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Critical Accounting Policies — Reserve for Losses and Loss Adjustment Expense" and "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 9. Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses" included under Item 8 "Financial Statement and Supplementary Data", for further information regarding the specific actuarial models we utilize and the uncertainties in establishing the reserve for loss and LAE. Our Employees On December 31, 2017, we had a total of 219 full-time employees who are located in Bermuda, the U.S., the U.K., Germany, Austria, Russia, Ireland, Australia, Sweden and Netherlands. We may increase our staff over time commensurate with the expansion of operations. We believe that our employee relations are good. None of our employees are subject to collective bargaining agreements. Regulatory Matters General The insurance and reinsurance industry are subject to regulatory and legislative oversight and regulation in various markets we operate in. Bermuda Insurance Regulation Maiden Bermuda is regulated as a registered Class 3B general business insurer under the Insurance Act 1978 of Bermuda, as amended, and related regulations (together, the "Insurance Act"), which regulates the insurance business of Bermuda registered insurers and provides that no person shall carry on any insurance business in or from within Bermuda unless that person has been registered under the Insurance Act by the BMA. The BMA is responsible for the day-to-day supervision of insurers and insurance groups in respect of which it is the group supervisor. Under the Insurance Act, insurance business includes reinsurance business. The registration of an applicant as an insurer is subject to its complying with the terms of its registration and such other conditions as the BMA may impose from time to time. The Insurance Act imposes solvency and liquidity standards as well as auditing and reporting requirements on Bermuda insurance companies and grants to the BMA powers to supervise, investigate and intervene in the affairs of insurance companies. The Insurance Act also imposes certain regulatory requirements on insurance groups where the BMA has determined that it should act as group supervisor. Certain significant aspects of the Bermuda insurance regulatory framework are set forth below: • Cancellation of Insurer's Registration: An insurer's registration may be canceled by the BMA on certain grounds specified in the Insurance Act, including failure of the insurer to comply with its obligations under the Insurance Act or if, in the opinion of the BMA, the insurer has not been carrying on business in accordance with sound insurance principles. We believe that we are in compliance with applicable regulations under the Insurance Act; • Principal Office, Principal Representative and Head Office: An insurer is required to maintain a principal office in Bermuda and to appoint and maintain a principal representative in Bermuda. It is the duty of the principal representative, upon reaching the view that there is a likelihood of the insurer for which the principal representative acts becoming insolvent, to the principal representative's knowledge, occurred or is believed to have occurred, to immediately notify the BMA and to make a report in writing to the BMA within 14 days of the prior notification setting out all the particulars of the case that are available to the principal representative. Further, any registered insurer that is a Class 3A insurer or above is required to maintain a head office in Bermuda and direct and manage its insurance business from Bermuda. The Insurance Act considers (a) where the underwriting, risk management and operational decision making occurs; (b) whether the presence of senior executives who are responsible for, and involved in, the decision making are located in Bermuda; and (c) where meetings of the board of directors occur. The BMA will consider (a) the location where management meets to effect policy decisions; (b) the residence of the officers, insurance managers or employees; and (c) the residence of one or more directors in Bermuda. For the purpose of the Insurance Act, Maiden Bermuda’s principal office is the Company’s executive offices at Ideation House, 2nd Floor, 94 Pitts Bay Road, Pembroke, HM 08, Bermuda; • Annual Financial Statements, Annual Statutory Financial Return and Annual Capital and Solvency Return: Maiden Bermuda and the Company must prepare annual statutory financial statements as prescribed in the Insurance Act with respect to its general business. The statutory financial return for a Class 3B insurer includes a report of the approved independent auditor on the statutory financial statements of such insurer, the statutory financial statements for the general business, and a statutory declaration of compliance. Maiden Bermuda is required to file audited U.S. GAAP annual financial statements with the BMA, which must be available to the public. In addition, Maiden Bermuda is required to file a capital and solvency return, which shall include the company's Bermuda Solvency Capital Requirement ("BSCR") model, a commercial insurer's solvency self-assessment ("CISSA"), a catastrophe risk return and a schedule of loss triangles or reconciliation of net loss reserves and a schedule of eligible capital. The BSCR model applies factors to premium, reserves and assets/liabilities to determine the minimum capital required by the BMA to remain solvent throughout the year. The catastrophe risk return assesses an insurer’s reliance on vendor models in assessing catastrophe exposure. The Company is required to file a group statutory financial return, group catastrophe risk return, group BSCR and GSSA. The GSSA is based on the Company’s own internally assessed capital requirements and is informed by our internal model. The GSSA together with the group BSCR form part of the BMA’s annual solvency assessment; • Minimum Liquidity Ratio: The Insurance Act requires all general business insurers to maintain the value of its relevant assets at not less than 75% of the amount of its relevant liabilities. Relevant assets include cash and cash equivalents, quoted investments, unquoted bonds and debentures, first liens on real estate, investment income due and accrued, accounts 12 and premiums receivable, reinsurance balances receivable and funds held by ceding reinsurers. There are certain categories of assets which, unless specifically permitted by the BMA, do not automatically qualify as relevant assets, such as unquoted equity securities, investments in and advances to affiliates and real estate and collateral loans. The relevant liabilities are total general business insurance reserves and total other liabilities less deferred income tax and letters of credit and guarantees; • Minimum Solvency Margin, Enhanced Capital Requirement and Restrictions on Dividends and Distributions: Under the Insurance Act, Maiden Bermuda must ensure that the value of its general business assets exceeds the amount of its general business liabilities by an amount greater than its prescribed minimum solvency margin ("MSM"). Maiden Bermuda is also required to maintain available statutory capital and surplus at least equal to its enhanced capital requirement ("ECR"). Maiden Bermuda is prohibited from declaring or paying dividends of more than 25% of its total statutory capital and surplus, as shown in its previous financial year statutory balance sheet, unless at least seven days before payment of the dividends it files with the BMA an affidavit that it will continue to meet its minimum capital requirements as described above. In addition, Maiden Bermuda must obtain the BMA’s prior approval before reducing its total statutory capital, as shown in its previous financial year statutory balance sheet, by 15% or more. Maiden Bermuda is not permitted to pay dividends to its sole shareholder, Maiden Holdings, if there are reasonable grounds for believing that we are, or would after the payment be, in breach of the Act, Insurance (Prudential Standards) Class 4 and Class 3B Solvency Requirement Rules 2008, including the ECR or the group ECR contained within such rules or under such other applicable rules and regulations as may from time to time be issued by the BMA; • Eligible Capital: Class 3B and 4 insurers and insurance groups are required to maintain statutory economic capital and surplus (“Economic Capital”) for determination of regulatory available capital in accordance with a ‘3 tiered capital regime’. All capital instruments are classified as either basic or ancillary capital which in turn are classified into one of three tiers (Tiers 1, 2 and 3) based on their “loss absorbency” characteristics. Under this regime, there are limits of Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3 capital which may be used to satisfy the Class 3B and 4 insurers’ and Group’s MSM and ECR requirements. The Company has received approval for certain capital instruments as other fixed capital. The 2013 Senior Notes are approved as Tier-1 ancillary capital and are grandfathered pursuant to Section 6C of the Insurance Act. The 2016 Senior Notes are approved as Tier-3 ancillary capital (please see footnote below for further details). Maiden's Preference Shares Series A and Series C are classified as Tier-1 Basic Capital. Maiden's Preference Shares Series D were approved on November 6, 2017 as Tier-2 Basic Capital. Please see the following table for details of the Company's capital instruments that are currently outstanding at December 31, 2017: Description of Capital Instrument Date of Issue Maturity Date (as applicable) Date approved by the Authority Value of Capital Instruments ($ in thousands) Eligible Capital Tier 2013 Senior Notes 2016 Senior Notes(1) Preference Shares - Series A(2) Preference Shares - Series C(2) November 25, 2013 December 1, 2043 April 17, 2014 $ June 14, 2016 June 14, 2026 January 23, 2017 August 22, 2012 Perpetual April 17, 2014 November 25, 2015 Perpetual April 17, 2014 Preference Shares - Series D(2) June 15, 2017 Perpetual November 6, 2017 152,500 110,000 150,000 165,000 150,000 Tier 1 Tier 3 Tier 1 Tier 1 Tier 2 (1) In June 2016, the Company issued $110.0 million aggregate principal amount of 6.625% notes maturing in 2046 (the "2016 Senior Notes"). The BMA approved the capital instruments as Tier-3 ancillary capital to be grandfathered under Section 21 paragraph 10 of the Group Rules until January 1, 2026 as the 2016 Senior Notes do not meet the requirement that coupon payment on the instrument be cancellable or deferrable indefinitely upon breach (or if it would cause breach) in the ECR. The Group’s ECR shall be subject to a regulatory capital add-on comprising three years of coupon payments on the 2016 Senior Notes amounting to $21.9 million. (2)All our Preference shares are redeemable in whole or in part at the sole option of the Company any time after 5 years from the date of issuance, subject to certain regulatory restrictions at a redemption price of $25 per preference share plus any declared and unpaid dividends, without accumulation of any undeclared dividends. • Economic Balance Sheet Framework and Financial Condition Report: Effective January 2016, the BMA has implemented an Economic Balance Sheet ("EBS") framework to be used as the basis to determine the ECR of insurers and group that is generally based on fair-value in line with the GAAP principles adopted by the insurer, except for the valuation of insurance technical provisions. Technical provisions shall be valued at an economic value using the best estimate of probability weighted cash flows, with an additional risk margin. Cash flows, for this purpose, shall take into account all future cash in and out flows required to settle the insurance obligations attributable to the remaining lifetime of the policy. The BMA has also implemented new public disclosure rules that require all insurers and insurance groups to prepare and publish a Financial Condition Report ("FCR"). The FCR is intended to provide additional information to the public in relation to the insurer’s and group’s business model, whereby they may make an informed assessment on whether the business is run in a prudent manner; • Fit and Proper Controllers: The BMA maintains supervision over the controllers of all registered insurers in Bermuda. A controller includes (i) the managing director of the registered insurer or its parent company; (ii) the chief executive of the registered insurer or of its parent company; (iii) a shareholder controller; and (iv) any person in accordance with whose directions or instructions the directors of the registered insurer or of its parent company are accustomed to act; • Notification by Registered Person of Change of Controllers and Officers: All registered insurers are required to give written notice to the BMA of the fact that a person has become, or ceased to be, a controller or officer of the registered insurer within 45 days of becoming aware of such fact. An officer in relation to a registered insurer means a director, 13 chief executive or senior executive performing duties of underwriting, actuarial, risk management, compliance, internal audit, finance or investment matters; • Notification of Material Changes: All registered insurers are required to give 14 days’ notice to the BMA of certain matters that are likely to be of material significance (a “Material Change” within the meaning of the Insurance Act); • Code of Conduct: Maiden Bermuda is required to comply with the Insurance Code of Conduct of the Authority ("Code") which prescribes the duties and standards which must be complied with to ensure it implements sound corporate governance, risk management and internal controls. Failure to comply with the requirements under the Code will be a factor taken into account by the BMA in determining whether an insurer is conducting its business in a sound and prudent manner as prescribed by the Insurance Act. Such failure to comply with the requirements of the Code could result in the BMA exercising its powers of intervention (see BMA's Powers of Intervention, Obtaining Information, Reports and Documents and Providing Information to other Regulatory Authorities below). We believe that we are in compliance with the Code; • Group Supervision: The BMA acts as group supervisor of the Company and has designated Maiden Bermuda to be the designated insurer ("Designated Insurer"). As group supervisor, the BMA will perform a number of supervisory functions including (i) coordinating the gathering and dissemination of information which is of importance for the supervisory task of other competent authorities; (ii) carrying out a supervisory review and assessment of the insurance group; (iii) carrying out an assessment of the insurance group's compliance with the rules on solvency, risk concentration, intra-group transactions and good governance procedures; (iv) planning and coordinating, through regular meetings with other competent authorities, supervisory activities in respect of the insurance group, both as a going concern and in emergency situations; (v) coordinating any enforcement action that may need to be taken against the insurance group or any of its members; and (vi) planning and coordinating meetings of colleges of supervisors in order to facilitate the carrying out of the functions described above. In carrying out its group supervisory functions, the BMA may make rules for (i) assessing the financial situation and the solvency position of the insurance group and/or its members and (ii) regulating intra group transactions, risk concentration, governance procedures, risk management and regulatory reporting and disclosure; • Group MSM and Group ECR: The Designated Insurer must ensure that the value of the insurance group's assets exceeds the amount of the group's liabilities by the aggregate minimum margin of solvency of each qualifying member of the group ("Group MSM"). A member is a qualifying member of the insurance group if it is subject to solvency requirements in the jurisdiction in which it is registered. Since December 31, 2013, we have been required to maintain available group capital and surplus at a level equal to or in excess of the Group Enhanced Capital Requirement ("Group ECR") which is established by reference to either the Group BSCR model or an approved group internal capital model; • Designated Insurer Notification Obligations: The Designated Insurer must notify the BMA upon reaching a view that there is a likelihood of the insurance group or any member of the group becoming insolvent or that a reportable "event" has, to the Designated Insurer's knowledge, occurred or is believed to have occurred. Within 30 days of such notification to the BMA, the Designated Insurer must furnish the BMA with a written report setting out all the particulars of the case that are available to it and within 45 days, it must furnish a group capital and solvency return that reflects the Group ECR that has been prepared using post-loss data and unaudited financial statements for such period as the BMA shall require together with a declaration of solvency in respect thereof; and • BMA's Powers of Intervention, Obtaining Information, Reports and Documents and Providing Information to other Regulatory Authorities: The BMA has certain powers of investigation and intervention relating to insurers and their holding companies, subsidiaries and other affiliates, which it may exercise in the interest of such insurer's policyholders or if there is any risk of insolvency or of a breach of the Insurance Act or the insurer's license conditions. The BMA’s prudential framework for (re)insurance and group supervision has been recognized by the European Commission’s Delegated Act and adopted by the European Parliament as being fully equivalent to regulatory standards applied to European reinsurance companies and insurance groups in accordance with the requirements of the Solvency II directive, effective January 1, 2016. Under the Solvency II directive, the European Commission may determine whether the solvency regime of a third country is equivalent to that laid down in Solvency II in relation to three areas of focus. Articles 172 relates to equivalence of the solvency regime applied to the reinsurance activities of (re)insurers with their head office in the third country concerned, which allows reinsurance contracts with (re)insurers in that third country to be treated in the same way as reinsurance contracts with EEA (re)insurers. Article 227 relates to third-country insurers which are part of EEA groups, where equivalence would allow groups to take into account the local calculation of capital requirements and available capital rather than calculation on a Solvency II basis for the purposes of the deduction and aggregation method. Article 260 relates to group supervision of EEA insurers with parents outside the EEA, where equivalence would mean EEA supervisors would rely on the group supervision of that third country. Bermuda received equivalence in all three areas: Articles 172, 227 and 260, with the exception of rules on captives and special purpose insurers, which are subject to different regulatory regime in Bermuda. Certain Bermuda Law Considerations Maiden Holdings and Maiden Bermuda have been designated as non-resident for exchange control purposes by the BMA and are required to obtain the permission of the BMA for the issue and transfer of all of their shares. The BMA has given its consent for: (a) the issue and transfer of Maiden Holdings' common shares, up to the amount of its authorized capital from time to time, to and among persons that are non-residents of Bermuda for exchange control purposes; and (b) the issue and transfer of up to 20% of Maiden Holdings' common shares in issue from time to time to and among persons resident in Bermuda for exchange control purposes. Transfers and issues of Maiden Holdings' common shares to any resident in Bermuda for exchange control purposes may require specific prior approval under the Exchange Control Act 1972. Maiden Bermuda's common shares cannot be issued or transferred without the consent of the BMA. Because we are designated as non-resident for Bermuda exchange control purposes, we are 14 allowed to engage in transactions, and to pay dividends to Bermuda non-residents who are holders of our common shares, in currencies other than the Bermuda Dollar. United States Maiden US, domiciled in Missouri, is an accredited reinsurer in six states and an authorized insurer in forty-five jurisdictions. Regulatory, supervisory and administrative authority is primarily delegated to the states with the exception of federal authority over boycott, coercion and intimidation, federal antitrust laws and where federal law is enacted specifically to regulate the business of insurance. Among other things, state insurance departments regulate insurer solvency standards, insurer and agent licensing, authorized investments, loss and expense reserves and provisions for unearned premiums, and deposits of securities for the benefit of policyholders. Maiden US is required to file detailed financial statements and other reports with the departments of insurance in all states in which they are licensed to transact business. These financial statements are subject to the supervision, regulation and periodic examination by the Missouri Department of Insurance ("DOI"). State Insurance Department Examinations Maiden US is subject to the financial supervision and regulation of the state in which it is domiciled. As part of their regulatory oversight process, state insurance departments conduct periodic detailed examinations of the financial reporting of insurance companies domiciled in their states, generally once every three to five years. Examinations may be carried out in cooperation with the insurance departments of other states under guidelines promulgated by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners ("NAIC"). Statutory Accounting Principles Statutory accounting principles ("SAP") are a basis of accounting developed to assist insurance regulators in monitoring and regulating the solvency of insurance companies. SAP is primarily concerned with measuring an insurer's surplus to policyholders. Accordingly, statutory accounting focuses on valuing assets and liabilities of insurers at financial reporting dates in accordance with appropriate insurance law and regulatory provisions applicable in each insurer's domiciliary state. U.S. GAAP is concerned with a company's solvency, but is also concerned with other financial measurements, principally income and cash flows. Accordingly, U.S. GAAP gives more consideration to appropriate matching of revenue and expenses and accounting for management's stewardship of assets than does SAP. As a direct result, different assets and liabilities and different amounts of assets and liabilities will be reflected in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP compared to SAP. Statutory accounting practices established by the NAIC and adopted in part by Missouri will determine, among other things, the amount of statutory surplus and statutory net income of Maiden US, and thus determine, in part, the amount of funds that are available to pay as dividends to Maiden NA. Holding Company Regulation Maiden US is subject to the U.S. statutory holding company laws of its state of domicile. The insurance holding company laws and regulations apply directly to individual insurers, indirectly to non-insurance entities, and provide regulators the ability to look at any entity within an insurance holding company system. State regulations generally provide that each insurance company in an insurance holding company system must register with the insurance department of its state of domicile. These laws vary from state to state, but each state has enacted legislation which requires licensed insurers that are subsidiaries of insurance holding companies to register and file with state regulatory authorities certain reports including information concerning their capital structure, ownership, financial condition and general business operations. All transactions involving the insurers in a holding company system and their affiliates must be fair and reasonable and, if material, require prior notice and approval or non-disapproval by the state insurance department of their domicile. Further, state insurance holding company laws typically place limitations on the amounts of dividends or other distributions payable by insurers. Payment of ordinary dividends by Maiden US requires prior approval of the Director of the Missouri DOI unless dividends will be paid out of "earned surplus". Earned surplus is an amount equal to the unassigned funds of an insurer as set forth in the most recent annual statement of the insurer including all or part of the surplus arising from unrealized capital gains or revaluation of assets. Extraordinary dividends generally require 30 days prior notice to and non-disapproval of the Missouri DOI before being paid. An extraordinary dividend includes any dividend whose fair market value together with that of other dividends or distributions made within the preceding 12 months exceeds the greater of: (1) 10% of the insurer's surplus as regards policyholders as of December 31 of the prior year, or (2) the net income of the insurer, not including realized capital gains, for the 12 month period ending December 31 of the prior year, but does not include pro rata distributions of any class of the insurer's own securities. State insurance holding company laws also require prior notice and state insurance department approval of changes in control of an insurer or its holding company. "Control" is generally defined as the possession, direct or indirect, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of the company, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract (except a commercial contract for goods or non-management services) or otherwise. Maiden US is domiciled in Missouri where any beneficial owner of 10% or more of the outstanding voting securities of an insurance company or its holding company is presumed to have acquired control, unless this presumption is rebutted. Therefore, an investor who intends to acquire beneficial ownership of 10% or more of our outstanding voting securities may need to comply with these laws and would be required to file notices and reports with the Missouri DOI and receive approval from the Missouri DOI or rebut the presumption of control before such acquisition. Additionally, the Model Holding Company Act and Model Holding Company Regulation address “enterprise” risk - the risk that an activity, circumstance, event, or series of events involving one or more affiliates of an insurer that, if not remedied promptly, is likely to have a material adverse effect upon the financial condition or liquidity of the insurer or its insurance holding company system as a whole. The Missouri DOI adopted the requirement for a holding company to annually submit an Enterprise Risk Report with the state commissioner. This enterprise risk report is filed annually. 15 In 2012, the NAIC adopted the Risk Management and Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (“ORSA”) Model Act (the “ORSA Model Act”), which requires domestic insurers to maintain a risk management framework and establishes a legal requirement for domestic insures to conduct an ORSA in accordance with the NAIC’s ORSA Guidance Manual. The ORSA Model Act provides that domestic insurers, or their insurance group, must regularly conduct an ORSA consistent with a process comparable to the ORSA Guidance Manual process. The ORSA Model Act also provides that, no more than once a year, an insurer's domiciliary regulator may request that an insurer submit an ORSA summary report, or any combination of reports that together contain the information described in the ORSA Guidance Manual, with respect to the insurer and/or the insurance group of which it is a member. Effective January 1, 2016, Missouri adopted its version of the ORSA Model Act. Annually, the Company files an ORSA Summary Report with the State of Missouri. Risk-Based Capital U.S. insurers are also subject to risk-based capital ("RBC") guidelines that provide a method to measure the total adjusted capital (statutory capital and surplus plus other adjustments) of insurance companies taking into account the risk characteristics of a company's investments and products. The RBC formulas establish capital requirements for four categories of risk: asset risk, insurance risk, interest rate risk and business risk. For each category, the capital requirement is determined by applying factors to asset, premium and reserve items, with higher factors applied to items with greater underlying risk and lower factors for less risky items. Insurers that have less statutory capital than the RBC calculation required are considered to have inadequate capital and are subject to varying degrees of regulatory action depending upon the level of capital inadequacy. Maiden US has satisfied the RBC formula and has exceeded all recognized industry solvency standards. At December 31, 2017, Maiden US had adjusted capital in excess of amounts requiring company or regulatory action. Reinsurance The ability of an insurer to take credit for the reinsurance purchased from reinsurance companies is a significant component of reinsurance regulation. Typically, an insurer will only enter into a reinsurance agreement if it can obtain credit to its reserves on its statutory financial statements for the reinsurance ceded to the reinsurer. With respect to U.S. domiciled reinsurers that reinsure U.S. insurers, credit is usually granted when the reinsurer is licensed, certified or accredited in a state where the primary insurer is domiciled or, in some instances, in a state in which the primary insurer is licensed. States also generally permit primary insurers to take credit for reinsurance if the reinsurer is (i) domiciled in a state with a credit for reinsurance law that is substantially similar to the standards in the primary insurer's state of domicile, and (ii) meets certain financial requirements. Credit for reinsurance purchased from a reinsurer that does not meet the foregoing conditions is generally allowed to the extent that such reinsurer secures its obligations with qualified collateral. We are able to take credit for all reinsurance purchased and all cedants are able to take credit for reinsurance they purchase from us. NAIC Ratios The NAIC Insurance Regulatory Information System ("IRIS") was developed to help state regulators identify companies that may require special attention. IRIS is comprised of statistical and analytical phases consisting of key financial ratios whereby financial examiners review annual statutory basis statements and financial ratios. Each ratio has an established "usual range" of results and assists state insurance departments in executing their statutory mandate to oversee the financial condition of insurance companies. A ratio result falling outside the usual range of IRIS ratios is not considered a failing result; rather unusual values are viewed as part of the regulatory early monitoring system. Furthermore, in some years, it may not be unusual for financially sound companies to have several ratios with results outside the usual ranges. An insurance company may fall out of the usual range for one or more ratios because of specific transactions that are in themselves immaterial. Generally, an insurance company will become subject to regulatory scrutiny and may be subject to regulatory action if it falls outside the usual ranges of four or more of the ratios. At December 31, 2017, Maiden US did not have an IRIS ratio range warranting any regulatory action. State Legislative and Regulatory Changes From time to time, various regulatory and legislative changes are proposed in the insurance industry. Among the proposals that have in the past been or are at present being considered are proposals in various state legislatures (some of which proposals have been enacted) to conform portions of their insurance laws and regulations to various model acts adopted by the NAIC. Under the 2011 revisions to the NAIC Credit for Reinsurance Model Law and Regulation, non-U.S. reinsurers from "qualified jurisdictions" can apply to become a "certified reinsurer". Effective January 1, 2015, the NAIC placed Bermuda, France, the United Kingdom, Germany, Japan, Ireland and Switzerland on the NAIC List of Qualified Jurisdictions. Certified reinsurers are highly rated reinsurers domiciled in qualified jurisdictions that are eligible to post less than 100% collateral for reinsurance assumed from U.S. ceding companies. Our insurance subsidiaries are required to comply with a wide variety of laws and regulations applicable to insurance or reinsurance companies, both in the jurisdictions in which they are organized and where they sell their insurance and reinsurance products. The insurance and regulatory environment, in particular for offshore insurance and reinsurance companies, has become subject to increased scrutiny in many jurisdictions, including the U.S., various states within the U.S. and the EU. In the past, there have been Congressional and other initiatives in the U.S. regarding increased supervision and regulation of the insurance industry. It is not possible to predict the future impact of changes in laws and regulations on our operations. The cost of complying with any new legal requirements affecting our subsidiaries could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, our subsidiaries may not always be able to obtain or maintain necessary licenses, permits, authorizations or accreditations. They also may not be able to fully comply with, or to obtain appropriate exemptions from, the laws and regulations applicable to them. Any failure to comply with applicable law or to obtain appropriate exemptions could result in restrictions on either the ability of the company in question, as well as potentially its affiliates, to do business in one or more of the jurisdictions in which they operate or on brokers on which we rely to produce business for us. In addition, any such failure to comply with applicable laws or to obtain appropriate exemptions could result in the imposition of fines or other sanctions. Any of these sanctions 16 could have a material adverse effect on our business. To date, no material fine, penalty or restriction has been imposed on us for failure to comply with any insurance law or regulation. International Standards U.S. federal and state regulators have committed in principle to adopting international standards with respect to basic regulatory issues such as accounting, risk management and corporate governance. International regulatory considerations are increasingly being deliberated by the NAIC and could increase regulatory burdens for Maiden US and have the potential to negatively impact all U.S. insurers, regardless of size. Various trade associations and industry participants are aggressively working to impact the NAIC adoption of these standards. However, the final outcome of these deliberations is unknown at this time. Federal Although the regulation of the business of insurance and reinsurance is predominantly performed by the states, federal initiatives, such as the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act ("Dodd-Frank"), often have an impact on the insurance industry. From time to time, various federal regulatory and legislative changes have been proposed in the insurance and reinsurance industry. Turmoil in the financial markets has increased the likelihood of changes in the way the financial services industry is regulated. While we cannot predict the exact nature, timing or scope of possible governmental initiatives, there may be increased regulatory intervention in our industry in the future. On January 13, 2017, the U.S. Department of the Treasury ("U.S. Treasury Department") and the office of the U.S. Trade Representative, ("USTR"), announced the successful completion of negotiations for a "covered agreement" in the meaning of the Dodd-Frank Act for the U.S. and an Agreement under Article 218 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union for the EU. The agreement covers three areas of prudential oversight: (1) reinsurance; (2) group supervision; and (3) the exchange of information between insurance supervisors. On September 22, 2017, the U.S. Treasury Department, USTR, and the European Union formally signed the Covered agreement. The agreement requires states to eliminate reinsurance collateral within 5 years or risk preemption. In exchange, the EU will not impose local presence requirements on U.S. firms operating in the EU, and effectively must defer to U.S. group capital regulation for U.S. entities of EU-based firms. The U.S. Treasury Department and USTR also released a U.S. policy statement clarifying their interpretation of the Covered Agreement in several key areas including capital, group supervision, reinsurance, and the Joint Committee. Over the coming months, state regulators working through the NAIC will make key decisions on whether and how to modify state laws and regulations to comport with the provisions of the covered agreement. Bermuda is not covered under this agreement. The Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2015 Terrorism Risk Insurance Act of 2002 ("TRIA"), which was previously amended and extended in 2005, 2007 and again in 2015 by the Terrorism Risk Insurance Program Reauthorization Act of 2015 ("TRIPRA"), was enacted to ensure the availability of insurance coverage for terrorist acts in the U.S. This law renewed the prior federal terrorism risk insurance program. It was extended through December 31, 2020 with certain modifications in the provisions of the expiring program. There is no assurance that TRIA will be extended beyond 2020 on either a temporary or permanent basis and its expiration (or renewal on a substantially modified basis) could have an adverse effect on our clients, the industry or us. TRIA does not apply to reinsurers directly but does apply directly to insurers and to excess and surplus lines insurers. The TRIPRA has had some impact on our reinsurance clients, but not all due to the lines of business covered by TRIA. Also, in general, our reinsurance contracts contain inuring language regarding any potential recoveries from TRIA. Additional material addressing TRIA and TRIPRA, including U.S. Treasury Department issued interpretive letters, are contained on the U.S. Treasury Department’s website. Taxation of the Company and its Subsidiaries The following summary of certain taxation matters is based upon current law. Legislative, judicial or administrative changes may be forthcoming that could affect this summary. Certain subsidiaries are subject to taxation related to operations in Australia, Germany, Russia, Sweden, the U.K. and the U.S. The discussion below covers the principal locations in which the Company or its subsidiaries are subject to taxation. Bermuda Maiden Holdings and Maiden Bermuda have each received from the Minister of Finance an assurance under The Exempted Undertakings Tax Protection Act, 1966 to the effect that in the event that there is any legislation enacted in Bermuda imposing tax computed on profits or income, or computed on any capital asset, gain or appreciation, or any tax in the nature of estate duty or inheritance tax, then the imposition of any such tax shall not be applicable to Maiden Holdings or Maiden Bermuda or to any of their operations or the shares, debentures or other obligations of Maiden Holdings or Maiden Bermuda until March 31, 2035. These assurances are subject to the proviso that they are not construed to prevent the application of any tax or duty to such persons as are ordinarily resident in Bermuda (Maiden Holdings and Maiden Bermuda are not currently so designated) or to prevent the application of any tax payable in accordance with the provisions of The Land Tax Act, 1967 of Bermuda or otherwise payable in relation to the property leased to us. Germany AVS is a wholly owned subsidiary of Maiden Global. AVS is subject to German corporate income tax of 15.0% plus a solidarity surcharge of 5.5% thereon (in the aggregate, a rate of 15.825%). In addition, a German municipal trade tax of 14.7% resulting from the registered seat of the company in Russelsheim is paid. Effective January 1, 2017, Opel Händler VersicherungsService GmbH, which was a wholly owned subsidiary of AVS, merged with AVS. AVS is engaged in general commerce. 17 The taxable income of a German corporate entity is in principle, absent a Treaty exemption, the total amount of worldwide income (current profits, capital gains) after deduction of business expenses. In general, income from capital gains arising upon the sale of shares in corporate entities are, in principle, fully tax exempt. The same applies to income from dividend if the stake in the dividend paying corporation is at least 10% (for corporate income tax purposes), 15% (for trade tax purposes) at the beginning of the respective calendar year (for dividends received from companies resident outside Germany, the 15% stake in the non-resident corporation must be held as from the beginning of the calendar year). However, a lump sum of 5% of the dividend/capital gains is added back to the taxable income, representing non-deductible business expenses. Maiden Global established a German branch on February 1, 2016, also with its registered seat in Russelsheim which is subject to the same German corporate income tax of 15.0% plus a solidarity surcharge of 5.5% thereon (in the aggregate, a rate of 15.825%) and German trade tax of 14.7%. The German branch is engaged in general commerce. AVS established a 50:50 joint venture with Volvo Car Germany GmbH on January 25, 2016, named VCIS Germany GmbH (“VCIS”). With its registered seat in Cologne, the company is subject to the same German corporate income tax of 15.0% plus a solidarity surcharge of 5.5% thereon (in the aggregate, a rate of 15.825%) and a German trade tax of 16.63%. VCIS is engaged in general commerce as an insurance agency. Maiden Global has obtained a withholding tax exemption certificate from the Federal Central Tax Office such that any dividend from AVS to Maiden Global is exempt from German withholding tax. There is no German withholding tax on (non-profit related) interest payments to corporate shareholders. Other than through the entities noted above, we believe that the Company has operated and will continue to operate its business in a manner that will not cause its affiliates to be treated as engaged in a trade or business within Germany. A trade or business in Germany requires a permanent establishment either in the form of a fixed place of business or by having a permanent representative on German ground. A subsidiary may qualify as permanent representative if it carries out business activities of its shareholder or an affiliate in Germany. Sweden Maiden LF and Maiden GF are subject to Swedish taxation on net profits irrespective of whether the profits are generated through business in general or capital. To the extent that net profits are generated, profits are taxed at a rate of 22%. Foreign entities are subject to tax in Sweden only to the extent they have a permanent establishment in Sweden or if the income is related to certain types of assets, typically real estate, or partnership income. Dividends paid to foreign shareholders may be subject to withholding tax with a maximum of 30% although in many cases tax is reduced as a result of a tax treaty or under domestic legislation. A foreign entity is deemed to have a permanent establishment in Sweden under the rules very similar to those applied by The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development ("OECD"). Other than Maiden LF and Maiden GF, we believe that the Company has operated and will continue to operate its business in a manner that will not cause it to be treated as having a permanent establishment in Sweden. There is no withholding tax on interest paid by a Swedish borrower to a foreign lender. United Kingdom Maiden Global is tax resident in the U.K. and is currently subject to corporation tax in the U.K. on its trading and other taxable profits. The main rate of U.K. corporation tax is 19% to be reduced to 17% with effect from April 1, 2020. Non-U.K. resident corporations are within the charge to corporation tax in the U.K. if they carry on a trade in the U.K. through a permanent establishment. Reinsurance business developed by Maiden Global is underwritten by Maiden Bermuda in Bermuda. Other than in respect of Maiden Global, we believe that the Company has operated and will continue to operate its business in a manner that will not cause it to be treated as carrying on a trade within the U.K. U.K. source income of non-U.K. resident corporations may be subject to U.K. withholding tax, subject to the availability of treaty relief or any other applicable exemptions. Dividends paid by Maiden Global are not subject to U.K. withholding tax. Interest paid by Maiden Global may be subject to U.K. withholding tax at a rate of up to 20%, subject to the availability of treaty relief or any other applicable exemptions. United States Recent tax reform commonly referred to as The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "2017 Act") was signed into law on December 22, 2017. The 2017 Act lowered the corporate U.S. tax rate to 21%, eliminated the alternative minimum tax, limited the deductibility of interest expense and requires a one-time tax on a deemed repatriation of untaxed earnings of foreign subsidiaries. In the context of the taxation of U.S. property/casualty insurance companies such as the Company, the 2017 Act also modified the loss reserve discounting rules and the proration rules that apply to reduce reserve deductions to reflect the lower corporate income tax rate. In addition, the 2017 Act included certain provisions intended to eliminate certain perceived tax advantages of companies (including insurance companies) that have legal domiciles outside the United States but have certain U.S. connections and U.S. persons investing in such companies. For example, the 2017 Act includes a base erosion anti-avoidance tax (the "BEAT") that could make affiliate reinsurance between United States and non-U.S. members of our group economically unfeasible. As discussed in more detail below, the 2017 Act also revised the rules applicable to passive foreign investment companies ("PFICs") and controlled foreign corporations ("CFCs"). Although we are currently unable to predict the ultimate impact of the 2017 Act on our business, shareholders and results of operations, it is possible that the 2017 Act may increase the U.S. federal income tax liability of U.S. members of our group that cede risk to non-U.S. group members and may affect the timing and amount of U.S. federal income taxes imposed on certain U.S. shareholders. Further, it is possible that other legislation could be introduced and enacted by the current Congress or future Congresses that could have an adverse impact on us. Additionally, tax laws and interpretations regarding whether a company is engaged in a U.S. trade or business or whether a company is a CFC or a PFIC or has related person insurance income ("RPII") are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis. There are currently only recently proposed regulations regarding the application of the PFIC rules to an insurance company. Further, the regulations regarding RPII have been in proposed form since 1991. New regulations or pronouncements interpreting or clarifying such rules may be forthcoming. The Company cannot be certain if, when or in what form such regulations or pronouncements may be provided and whether such guidance will have a retroactive effect. 18 Maiden NA and its subsidiaries, including Maiden US (collectively, the "Maiden NA Companies"), transact business in and are subject to taxation in the U.S. Other than the Maiden NA Companies, we believe that we have operated and will continue to operate our business in a manner that will not cause us to be treated as engaged in a trade or business within the U.S. On this basis, other than the Maiden NA Companies, we do not expect to be required to pay U.S. corporate income taxes (other than withholding and excise taxes as described below). The maximum federal corporate income tax rate has been reduced by the 2017 Act to 21% for a foreign corporation’s income that is effectively connected with a trade or business in the U.S. In addition, U.S. branches of foreign corporations may be subject to the branch profits tax, which imposes a tax on U.S. branch after-tax earnings that are deemed repatriated out of the U.S., for a potential maximum effective federal tax rate of approximately 44% on the net income connected with a U.S. trade or business. Foreign corporations not engaged in a trade or business in the U.S. are subject to U.S. income tax, effected through withholding by the payer, on certain fixed or determinable annual or periodic gains, profits and income derived from sources within the U.S. as enumerated in Section 881(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, such as dividends and interest on certain investments. The U.S. also imposes an excise tax on insurance and reinsurance premiums paid to foreign insurers or reinsurers with respect to risks of a U.S. person located wholly or partly within the U.S. or risks of a foreign person engaged in the conduct of a U.S. trade or business located in the U.S. The rate of tax applicable to reinsurance premiums paid to Maiden Bermuda is 1% of gross premiums. 19 Where You Can Find More Information We maintain our principal website at www.maiden.bm. The information on our websites is not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. We make available, free of charge through our principal website, our financial information, including the information contained in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish such material to, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). We also make available, free of charge through our principal website, our Audit Committee Charter, Compensation Committee Charter, Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee Charter, and Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Such information is also available in print for any shareholder who sends a request to Maiden Holdings, Ltd., Ideation House, 94 Pitts Bay Road, Pembroke HM 08, Bermuda, Attention: Secretary. Reports and other information we file with the SEC may also be viewed at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov or viewed or obtained at the SEC Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549. Information on the operation of the SEC Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at 800-SEC-0330. 20 Item 1A. Risk Factors. Introduction Investing in our securities carries risk. Managing risk effectively is critical to our success, and our organization is built around intelligent risk assumptions and prudent risk management. We have identified what we believe reflect key significant risks to the organization, and in turn to our shareholders, which are outlined below. Any of the risks described below could result in a significant or material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. In addition to these enumerated risks, we face numerous other strategic, operational and emerging risks that could in the aggregate lead to shortfalls to our long-term goals or add to short- term volatility in our earnings. The following review of important risk factors should not be construed as exhaustive and should be read in conjunction with other cautionary statements that are included herein or elsewhere. The words or phrases believe, anticipate, estimate, project, plan, expect, intend, hope, forecast, evaluate, will likely result or will continue or words or phrases of similar import generally involve forward-looking statements. All of the risks that may affect our financial or operating performance may not be material at this time but may become material in the future. As used in these Risk Factors, the terms "we", "our" or "us" may, depending upon the context, refer to the Company, to one or more of the Company’s consolidated subsidiaries or to all of them taken as a whole. Business Our business model is different than other Bermuda reinsurers. Unlike many other publicly traded Bermuda reinsurance companies, we do not write property catastrophe reinsurance, nor do we maintain substantial primary insurance operations. As a result, you may not be able to compare our business’s performance or prospects to other Bermuda-domiciled publicly traded reinsurers, who have very different strategies and balance sheet structures than us. We may not be able to manage our growth effectively. Since our inception, our business has grown at a compound annual growth rate of 20.8%. We expect our business growth to moderate in the future as we continue our relationships with existing clients while seeking opportunities to reinsure other insurance companies operating in similar niches. Expansion of our business at a rate faster than we anticipate could require additional resources including capital and possibly personnel. While we believe we have demonstrated our ability to effectively manage growth to date, and believe we have additional measures at our disposal to effectively manage growth, both anticipated and unanticipated, we cannot assure you that we will be able to meet our capital needs, expand our systems effectively, allocate our human resources optimally, identify and hire qualified employees or incorporate effectively the components of any businesses we may acquire. The failure to manage our growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additional measures available to us include but are not limited to, additional capital offerings including debt, equity and hybrid- based, the use of retrocessional reinsurance and the application of other reinsurance mechanisms that reduce or limit the amount of exposure we assume. There can be no guarantee, however, that such measures can be implemented on terms and conditions that do not have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Ongoing economic uncertainty could materially and adversely affect our business, our liquidity and financial condition. Global economies and financial markets have, from time to time, experienced significant disruption or deterioration and likely will experience periods of disruption or deterioration in the future. In addition, U.S. federal and state governments continue to experience significant structural fiscal deficits, creating uncertainty as to levels of taxation, inflation, regulation and other economic fundamentals that may impact future growth prospects. Significantly greater economic, fiscal and monetary uncertainty remains in Europe, due to the combination of poor economic growth, high unemployment and significant sovereign deficits which have called into question the future of the common currency used across most of Europe. European economic activity appears likely to remain volatile in the near future and to potentially have a continuing impact on the U.S. economy. Continuation of these conditions may potentially affect (among other aspects of our business) the demand for and claims made under our products, the ability of clients, counterparties and others to establish or maintain their relationships with us, our ability to access and efficiently use internal and external capital resources and our investment performance. Our Agency Mortgage-backed securities ("MBS") constitute 39.2% of our fixed maturity investments at December 31, 2017. As with other fixed income investments, the fair value of these securities fluctuates depending on market and other general economic conditions and the interest rate environment. Changes in interest rates can expose us to changes in the prepayment rate on these investments. In periods of declining interest rates, mortgage prepayments generally increase and MBS are prepaid more quickly, requiring us to reinvest the proceeds at the then current lower market rates. Conversely, in periods of rising rates, mortgage prepayments generally fall, preventing us from taking full advantage of the higher level of rates. However, economic conditions may curtail prepayment activity on the underlying mortgages if refinancing is difficult, thus limiting prepayments on the MBS portfolio. In the event that these conditions persist and result in a prolonged period of economic uncertainty, our results of operations, our financial condition and/or liquidity, and our prospects could be materially and adversely affected. Our actual losses may be greater than our reserve for loss and LAE, which would negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations. We expect that our success will depend upon our ability to assess accurately the risks associated with the businesses that we will reinsure. Significant periods of time often elapse between the occurrence of an insured loss, the reporting of the loss to an insurer and the reporting of the loss by the insurer to its reinsurer and the ultimate disposition of that loss. The reserves we establish represent estimates of amounts needed to pay reported losses and unreported losses and the related loss adjustment expense. Loss reserves are only an estimate of what an insurer or reinsurer anticipates the ultimate costs of claims to be and do not represent an 21 exact calculation of liability. Estimating loss reserves is a difficult and complex process involving many variables and subjective judgments. As part of our reserving process, we review historical data as well as actuarial and statistical projections and consider the impact of various factors such as: trends in claim frequency and severity; changes in operations; emerging economic and social trends; inflation; and changes in the regulatory and litigation environments. This process assumes that past experience, adjusted for the effects of current developments and anticipated trends, is an appropriate basis for predicting future events. There is no precise method, however, for evaluating the impact of any specific factor on the adequacy of reserves, and actual results are likely to differ from original estimates. In addition, unforeseen losses, the type or magnitude of which we cannot predict, may emerge in the future. We will establish or adjust reserves for our insurance subsidiaries in part based upon loss data received from the ceding companies with which we do business, including AmTrust. There is a time delay that elapses between the receipt and recording of claims results by the ceding insurance companies and the receipt and recording of those results by us. Accordingly, establishment and adjustment of reserves for our insurance subsidiaries is dependent upon timely and accurate estimate reporting from cedants and agents. During 2016 and 2017, we recognized adverse development, largely in the AmTrust Quota Share and in Commercial Auto in the US Diversified segment, that was significantly greater than we expected. While we adjusted our reserves to a level we believe to be sufficient to cover losses assumed by us, there can be no assurance that losses will not deviate from our reserves, possibly by material amounts. To the extent actual reported losses exceed expected losses, the carried estimate of the ultimate losses will be increased, which represents unfavorable reserve development, and to the extent actual reported losses are less than our expectations, the carried estimate of ultimate losses will be reduced, which represents favorable reserve development. The inherent uncertainty of models and the use of such models as a tool to evaluate risk may have an adverse impact on our financial results. We use both our own proprietary models and widely accepted and industry-recognized third party vendor analytic and modeling capabilities to provide us with pricing, capital modeling and objective risk assessment relating to risks in our reinsurance portfolio. In addition, we also use widely accepted and industry-recognized third party vendor analytic and modeling capabilities to provide us with objective risk assessment relating to catastrophe risks in our reinsurance portfolio. These models help us control risk accumulation, inform management and other stakeholders of capital requirements and to improve the risk/return profile or minimize the amount of capital required to cover the risks in each reinsurance contract in our overall portfolio of reinsurance contracts. However, given the inherent uncertainty of modeling techniques and the application of such techniques, these models and databases may not accurately address the emergence of a variety of matters which might be deemed to impact certain of our coverages. Accordingly, these models may understate the exposures we are assuming and our financial results may be adversely impacted, perhaps significantly. For our property and casualty reinsurance underwriting, we depend on the policies, procedures and expertise of ceding companies; these companies may fail to accurately assess and price the risks they underwrite, which may lead us to inaccurately assess and price the risks we assume. Our participation in property and casualty reinsurance markets means the success of our underwriting efforts depends, in part, upon the policies, procedures and expertise of the ceding companies making the original underwriting decisions. As common among reinsurers, we do not separately evaluate each of the individual risks assumed under reinsurance treaties. We face the risk that these ceding companies may fail to accurately assess the risks that they assume initially, which, in turn, may lead us to inaccurately assess the risks we assume. If we fail to establish and receive appropriate pricing or fail to contractually limit our exposure to such risks, we could face significant losses on these contracts, which could have a material adverse impact on our financial results. Our business success and reputation depend, in part, on effective information technology systems. We believe our modeling, underwriting and information technology and application systems are critical to our business and reputation. Moreover, our technology and applications have been an important part of our underwriting process and our ability to compete successfully. Such technology is and will continue to be a very important part of our underwriting process. We have also licensed certain systems and data from third parties. We cannot be certain that we will have access to these, or comparable service providers, or that our technology or applications will continue to operate as intended. In addition, we cannot be certain that we would be able to replace these service providers or consultants without slowing our underwriting response time. A major defect or failure in our internal controls or information technology and application systems could result in management distraction, harm to our reputation, a loss or delay of revenues or increased expense. Our internal control and reporting systems might not be effective in the future, which could increase the risk that we would become subject to restatements of our financial results or to regulatory action or litigation or other developments that could adversely affect our business. Our ability to produce accurate financial statements and comply with applicable laws, rules and regulations is largely dependent on our maintenance of internal control and reporting systems, as well as on our ability to attract and retain qualified management and accounting and actuarial personnel to further develop our internal accounting function and control policies. If we fail to effectively establish and maintain such reporting and accounting systems or fail to attract and retain personnel who are capable of designing and operating such systems, these failures will increase the likelihood that we may be required to restate our financial results to correct errors or that we will become subject to legal and regulatory infractions, which may entail civil litigation and investigations by regulatory agencies including the SEC. In addition, if our management or our independent registered public accounting firm were to conclude that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information, and our financial flexibility and the value of our common shares could be adversely impacted. 22 The occurrence of severe catastrophic events may have a material adverse effect on our financial results. Although our business strategy generally precludes us from writing significant amounts of catastrophe exposed business in our reinsurance segment, most property reinsurance contains some exposure to catastrophic loss. Our Diversified Reinsurance segment includes only limited exposure to natural and man-made disasters, such as hurricane, typhoon, windstorm, flood, earthquake, acts of war, acts of terrorism and political instability. We utilize PML estimates for the U.S. to manage exposures to our natural catastrophes. We also use contract provisions such as occurrence caps and inuring excess to manage exposure to natural catastrophes. While we attempt to carefully manage our aggregate exposure to catastrophes, modeling errors and the incidence and severity of catastrophes, such as hurricanes, windstorms, cyber attacks and large-scale terrorist attacks, are inherently unpredictable, and our losses from catastrophes could be substantial. Further, many scientists believe that the earth's atmospheric and oceanic temperatures are increasing and that, in recent years, changing climate conditions have increased the unpredictability, severity and frequency of natural disasters in certain parts of the world. We may face substantial exposure to losses from terrorism, acts of war and political instability. We may have exposure to losses resulting from acts of terrorism, acts of war and political instability as a reinsurer of U.S. domiciled insurers. U.S. insurers are required by state and federal law to offer coverage for terrorism in certain commercial lines. These risks are inherently unpredictable, although recent events may lead to increased frequency and severity. It is difficult to predict the occurrence of these perils with statistical certainty or to estimate the amount of loss an occurrence will generate. We closely monitor the amount and types of coverage we provide for terrorism risk under insurance policies and reinsurance treaties. We often seek to exclude or limit terrorism when we cannot reasonably evaluate the risk of loss or charge an appropriate premium for such risk. Even in cases where we have deliberately sought to exclude coverage, we may not be able to eliminate our exposure to terrorist acts, and thus it is possible that these acts could have a material adverse effect on us. We may or may not use retrocessional and reinsurance coverage to limit our exposure to risks. Any retrocessional or reinsurance coverage that we obtain may be limited, and credit and other risks associated with our retrocessional and reinsurance arrangements may result in losses which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. We will provide reinsurance to our clients and in turn we may or may not retrocede reinsurance we assume to other insurers and reinsurers. If we do not use retrocessional coverage or reinsurance, our exposure to losses will be greater than if we did obtain such coverage. If we do obtain retrocessional or reinsurance coverage, some of the insurers or reinsurers to whom we may retrocede coverage or reinsure with may be domiciled in Bermuda or other non-U.S. locations. We would be subject to credit and other risks that depend upon the financial strength of these reinsurers. Further, we will be subject to credit risk with respect to any retrocessional or reinsurance arrangements because the ceding of risk to reinsurers and retrocessionaires would not relieve us of our liability to the clients or companies we insure or reinsure. Our failure to establish adequate reinsurance or retrocessional arrangements or the failure of any retrocessional arrangements to protect us from overly concentrated risk exposure could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operation. We may attempt to mitigate such risks by retaining collateral or trust accounts for premium and claims receivables, but nevertheless we cannot be assured that reinsurance will be fully collectable in the case of all potential claims outcomes. The failure of any of the loss limitation methods we employ could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. We also seek to limit loss exposure through loss limitation provisions in policies we write, such as limitations on the amount of losses that can be claimed under a policy, limitations or exclusions from coverage and provisions relating to choice of forum, which are intended to assure that our policies are legally interpreted as intended. There can be no assurance that these contractual provisions will be enforceable in the manner expected or that disputes relating to coverage will be resolved in our favor. If the loss limitation provisions in the policies are not enforceable or disputes arise concerning the application of such provisions, the losses we incur could be materially higher than expected and our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. The effects of emerging claim and coverage issues on our business are uncertain. As industry practices and legal, judicial, social and other environmental conditions change, unexpected issues related to claims and coverage may emerge. These issues may adversely affect our business by either extending coverage beyond our underwriting intent or by increasing the number or size of claims. In some instances, these changes may not become apparent until sometime after we have issued insurance or reinsurance contracts that are affected by the changes. As a result, the full extent of liability under our reinsurance contracts may not be known for many years after a contract is issued. Our exposure to these uncertainties could be exacerbated by an increase in insurance and reinsurance contract disputes, arbitration and litigation. Our business is subject to risks related to litigation. We may from time to time be subject to litigation in the ordinary course of business relating to our current and past business operations, including, but not limited to, disputes over coverage or claims adjudication, including claims alleging that we have acted in bad faith in the administration of claims by our policyholders, disputes with our agents, producers and termination of contracts and related claims and disputes with former employees. We also cannot determine with any certainty what new theories of recovery may evolve or what their impact may be on our business. An adverse resolution of one or more lawsuits or arbitrations could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in a particular fiscal quarter or year. The failure of our underwriting process could have an adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition. We seek to manage our loss exposure by maintaining a disciplined underwriting process throughout our (re)insurance operations. This is achieved through our risk appetite for traditional, lower volatility lines of business that are more predictable and thus, 23 produce more stable long-term operating results and require less capital to achieve those results; and by placing emphasis on working layer and pro rata reinsurance participations where data is more abundant and predictable. Underwriting is a matter of judgment, involving important assumptions about matters that are inherently unpredictable and beyond our control, and for which historical experience and probability analysis may not provide sufficient guidance. The failure of any of the underwriting risk management strategies that we employ could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. We rely on internal controls and underwriting guidelines to limit our risk exposure within prescribed parameters. However, our controls and monitoring efforts may be ineffective, permitting one or more underwriters to exceed underwriting authority and cause us to (re)insure risks outside the agreed upon guidelines. To the extent that our underwriters exceed their authorities, agree to inappropriate contract terms and conditions or are influenced by broker incentives, or if there is inaccurate underwriting data capture and reporting leading to licensing and sanction breaches, our financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected. Technology breaches or failures, including, but not limited to, those resulting from cyber-attacks on us or our business partners and service providers, could disrupt or otherwise negatively impact our business. Information technology and application systems can streamline many business processes and ultimately reduce the cost of operations, however, technology initiatives present certain risks. Our business is dependent upon our employees and outsources ability to perform, in an efficient and uninterrupted fashion, necessary business functions. Like all companies, our information technology systems are vulnerable to data breaches, interruptions or failures due to events that may be beyond our control, including, but not limited to, natural disasters, theft, terrorist attacks, computer viruses, hackers and general technology failures. Our information technology systems include the Internet and third-party hosted services. We use information systems to process financial information and results of operations for internal reporting purposes and for regulatory financial reporting, legal and tax requirements. We also use information systems for electronic communications with customers and our various locations. A shutdown or inability to access one or more of our facilities, a power outage, a security breach, or a failure of one or more of our information technology, telecommunications or other systems could significantly impair our ability to perform such functions on a timely basis. These incidents could be caused by malicious or disruptive software, computer hackers, rogue employees, cyber- attacks, failures of telecommunications systems or other catastrophic events. If sustained or repeated, such a business interruption, system failure or service denial could result in a deterioration of our ability to write and process business, provide customer service, pay claims in a timely manner or perform other necessary business functions. Furthermore, a significant portion of the communications between our employees and our business, banking and investment partners depends on information technology and electronic information exchange. In addition, we may suffer financial and reputational damage because of lost or misappropriated confidential information belonging to us, and may become subject to legal action and increased regulatory oversight. We could also be required to spend significant financial and other resources to remedy any damage caused to repair or replace information systems. We believe that we have established and implemented appropriate security measures, controls and procedures to safeguard our information technology systems and to prevent unauthorized access to such systems and any data processed and/or stored in such systems, and we periodically employ third parties to evaluate and test the adequacy of such systems, controls and procedures. In addition, we have established a business continuity plan which is designed to ensure that we are able to maintain all aspects of our key business processes functioning in the midst of certain disruptive events, including any disruptions to or breaches of our information technology systems. We continue to make investments in technologies, cyber-insurance and training. Our business continuity plans are tested and evaluated for adequacy. Despite these safeguards, disruptions to and breaches of our information technology systems are possible and may negatively impact our business. Like most major corporations, the Company’s information systems are a target of attacks. Although we have experienced no known material or threatened cases involving unauthorized access to our information technology systems and data or unauthorized appropriation of such data to date, we have no assurance that such technology breaches will not occur in the future. The U.K.'s vote in favor of leaving the EU could adversely affect us. As a result of Brexit, negotiations to determine the terms of the U.K.’s withdrawal from the EU and its future relationship with the EU are ongoing. As a result, the risks associated with the potential consequences that may follow Brexit, including volatility in financial markets, exchange rates and interest rates, are uncertain. These uncertainties could increase the volatility of, or reduce, our investment results in particular periods or over time. Brexit could adversely affect European or worldwide political, regulatory, economic or market conditions and could contribute to instability in global political institutions and regulatory agencies. We believe, as a Bermuda reinsurance company, we are well positioned to continue trading with both markets after the completion of these negotiations. However, given these possibilities and others we may not anticipate, as well as the lack of comparable precedent, the full extent to which our business, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected by Brexit is uncertain. 24 Insurance and Reinsurance Markets The property and casualty insurance and reinsurance industry is cyclical in nature, which may affect our overall financial performance. Historically, the financial performance of the property and casualty insurance and reinsurance industry has tended to fluctuate in cyclical periods of price competition and excess capacity (known as a soft market) followed by periods of high premium rates and shortages of underwriting capacity (known as a hard market). Although the financial performance of an individual insurance or reinsurance company is dependent on its own specific business characteristics, the profitability of most property and casualty insurance and reinsurance companies tends to follow this cyclical market pattern. In recent years, the market has been in a competitive environment in which underwriting capacity has expanded, risk selection became less disciplined and price competition increased sharply. During that period, market participants' capital levels have continued to improve due to positive earnings and improved values of risk assets over that time. In addition, an influx of new market participants with different operating models than traditional reinsurers such as us have entered the market place. While many of these new market participants specialize in property catastrophe oriented business and do not directly compete with us, they are influencing competitive conditions in the broader reinsurance market. This additional underwriting capacity resulted in increased competition from other insurance and reinsurance companies expanding the types or amounts of business they write, or from companies seeking to maintain or increase market share at the expense of underwriting discipline. Because this cyclicality is due in large part to the actions of our competitors and general economic factors beyond our control, we cannot predict with certainty the timing or duration of changes in the market cycle. These cyclical patterns, the actions of our competitors, and general economic factors could cause our revenues and net income to fluctuate, which may cause the price of our common shares to be volatile. The ultimate outcome of these events and their market impact is not known at this time. Negative developments in the U.S. workers’ compensation insurance industry could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. In 2017, reinsurance of U.S. workers’ compensation insurance was 40.8% of total gross premiums written, which is our largest exposure to a particular line of business, and reflects the ongoing growth of our largest client, AmTrust. Nonetheless, negative developments in the economic, competitive or regulatory conditions affecting the U.S. workers’ compensation insurance industry could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. For example, if legislators in our larger markets were to enact legislation to increase the scope or amount of benefits for employees under U.S. workers’ compensation insurance policies without related premium increases or loss control measures, or if regulators made other changes to the regulatory system governing U.S. workers’ compensation insurance, this could negatively affect the U.S. workers’ compensation insurance industry in the affected markets. In many states, there are active regulatory activities that oversee the level of rates that can be charged by individual insurers. As a result, there is a risk that our clients may not be able to implement needed rate increases to maintain sufficient levels of profitability on business we write and clients may implement decreases that adversely affect us. We operate in a highly competitive industry. The reinsurance industry is highly competitive. We compete with major U.S. and non-U.S. reinsurers, including other Bermuda- based reinsurers, on an international and regional basis. Many of these entities have significantly larger amounts of capital, higher ratings from rating agencies and more resources than us. Historically, periods of increased capacity levels in our industry have led to increased competition which puts pressure on reinsurance pricing. In recent years, significant increases in the use of risk-linked securities and derivative and other non-traditional risk transfer mechanisms and vehicles are being developed and offered by other parties, including entities other than insurance and reinsurance companies. The availability of both these non-traditional products and sources of capital could reduce the demand for traditional insurance and reinsurance and may result in fewer contracts written, lower premium rates, increased expenses for customer acquisition and retention and less favorable policy terms and conditions, which could have a material adverse impact on our growth and profitability. We believe that there will be opportunities to renew existing business and write new reinsurance and insurance through Maiden US and Maiden Bermuda. We cannot assure you, however, that Maiden US or Maiden Bermuda will retain its clients or write new business as we may expect. However, market conditions have been competitive for an extended period of time and are expected to remain competitive for the foreseeable future, particularly as new market participants with business objectives different from ours influence the competitive environment. In addition, other companies may continue to offer reinsurance and insurance products on more competitive terms than we can provide. Under these circumstances, we might not be able to expand our reinsurance business and the failure to do so may have a material adverse effect on our ability to fully implement our business strategy, as well as on our financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Our efforts to develop products, expand in targeted markets or modify our business and strategic plans may not be successful and may create enhanced risks. A number of our planned business initiatives involve developing new products or expanding existing products in targeted markets. To develop new products or markets, we may need to make substantial capital and operating expenditures, which may negatively impact our results in the near term. In addition, the demand for new products or in new markets may not meet our expectations. To the extent we are able to market new products or expand in new markets, our risk exposures may change and the data and models we use to manage such exposures may not be as sophisticated as those we use in existing markets or with existing products. This, in turn, could lead to losses in excess of expectations. As part of our ongoing efforts to continually improve our performance, we regularly evaluate our business plans and strategies, which may result in changes to our business plans and initiatives, some of which may be material. We are subject to increasing risks related to our ability to successfully implement our 25 evolving plans and strategies. Changing plans and strategies requires significant management of time and effort, and may divert management’s attention from our core operations and competencies. Moreover, modifications we undertake to our operations may not immediately result in improved financial performance. Therefore, risks associated with implementing or changing our business strategies and initiatives, including risks related to developing or enhancing the operations, controls and other infrastructure required for these strategies and initiatives, may not have a positive impact on our publicly reported results until many years after implementation. The risk that we may fail to have the ability to carry out our business plans may have an adverse effect on our long-term results of operations and financial condition. Consolidation in the insurance and reinsurance industry and increased competition on premium rates could lead to lower margins for us and less demand for our products and services. The insurance and reinsurance industry continues to undergo a process of consolidation as industry participants seek to enhance their product and geographic reach, client base, operating efficiency and general market power through merger and acquisition activities. It is possible that the larger combined entities resulting from these mergers and acquisition activities may seek to use the benefits of consolidation, including improved efficiencies and economies of scale, to, among other things, implement price reductions for their products and services to increase their market shares. Consolidation among primary insurance companies may also lead to reduced use of reinsurance as the resulting larger companies may be able to retain more risk and may also have bargaining power in negotiations with reinsurers. If competitive pressures compel us to reduce our prices, our operating margins will decrease. As the insurance and reinsurance industry consolidates, competition may become more intense and the importance of acquiring and properly servicing each customer will become greater. We could incur greater expenses relating to customer acquisition and retention, which could reduce our operating margins. When the property-casualty insurance industry has exhibited a greater degree of competition, premium rates have come under downward pressure as a result. Greater competition could result in reduced volumes of reinsurance written and could reduce our profitability. Financial Strength and Debt Ratings Ratings downgrades of either Maiden Bermuda or Maiden US may adversely affect our competitive position and our ability to meet our financial goals and capital requirements. Competition in the types of insurance business that we intend to reinsure is based on many factors, including the perceived financial strength of the insurer and ratings assigned by independent rating agencies. Maiden Bermuda and Maiden US have each received a financial strength rating of "A" (Excellent, the third highest out of sixteen rating levels) with a stable outlook from A.M. Best. On November 17, 2017, S&P Global Ratings (“S&P”) lowered its long–term issuer credit and financial strength ratings on our principal operating subsidiaries to 'BBB' from 'BBB+' with a negative outlook. S&P also lowered its long–term issuer credit and senior debt ratings on Maiden Holdings to 'BB+' from 'BBB–'. At our request, S&P then subsequently withdrew its ratings and we thus have no S&P ratings at the present time. Our withdrawal of the S&P rating did not have a material impact on opportunities in the subsequent months and there has not been a noticeable reduction in current underwriting opportunities. Ratings from these agencies are an opinion of our financial strength and ability to meet ongoing obligations to our future policyholders, and it is not an evaluation directed to our investors in our common shares, preference shares or senior notes, nor is it a recommendation to buy, sell or hold our common shares, preference shares or senior notes. Each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. The ratings of Maiden Bermuda and Maiden US are subject to periodic review by, and may be revised downward or revoked at any time at the sole discretion of the rating agency. If A.M. Best were to downgrade Maiden Bermuda’s rating two notches to below "A-", AII and other clients would have the right to terminate their respective reinsurance agreements. More generally, if A.M. Best were to downgrade Maiden Bermuda or Maiden US, our competitive position would suffer, and our ability to market our products, to obtain clients and to compete in the reinsurance industry could be adversely affected. A downgrade below A- could result in a substantial loss of business because our clients may move to other reinsurers with higher claims paying and financial strength ratings. Clients, Brokers and Financial Institutions Our business is dependent upon reinsurance brokers and other producers, including third party administrators and financial institutions, and the failure to develop or maintain these relationships could materially adversely affect our ability to market our products and services. We market a significant portion of products in our Diversified Reinsurance segment through brokers and expect that we will derive a significant portion of our business from a limited number of brokers. Our failure to further develop or maintain relationships with brokers from whom we expect to receive our business could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our reliance on brokers subjects us to their credit risk. In accordance with industry practice, we anticipate that we will frequently pay amounts owed on claims under our reinsurance contracts to brokers, and these brokers in turn are required to pay and will pay these amounts over to the clients that have purchased reinsurance from us. If a broker fails to make such a payment, it is highly likely that we will be liable to the client for the deficiency under local laws or contractual obligations, notwithstanding the broker’s obligation to make such payment. Likewise, when the client pays premiums for these policies to brokers for payment over to us, these premiums are considered to have been paid and, in most cases, the client will no longer be liable to us for those amounts, whether or not we actually receive the premiums from the brokers. Consequently, we will assume a degree of credit risk associated with brokers with whom we work with respect to most of our reinsurance business. 26 We could incur substantial losses and reduced liquidity if one of the financial institutions we use in our operations fails. We have exposure to counterparties in many different industries and routinely execute transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including brokers and dealers, commercial banks, and other institutions. Many of these transactions expose us to credit risk in the event of default of our counterparty. In addition, with respect to secured transactions, our credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral held by us cannot be realized or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the obligation. We maintain cash balances, including restricted cash held in trust accounts, significantly in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits at various depository institutions. We also maintain cash balances in foreign banks and institutions. If one or more of these financial institutions were to fail, our ability to access cash balances may be temporarily or permanently limited, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. Liquidity, Capital Resources and Investments A significant amount of our invested assets are subject to changes in interest rates and market volatility. If we were unable to realize our investment objectives, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected. Investment income is an important component of our net income. At December 31, 2017, the total investments of $5.1 billion represented 96.4% of our total cash and investments, of which $6.6 million or 0.1% were in other investments, a combination of investments in limited partnerships and equity investments. As a result of market conditions prevailing at a particular time, the allocation of our portfolio to various asset types may vary. The fair market value of these assets and the investment income from these assets will fluctuate depending on general economic and market conditions. As we currently classify 78.7% of our fixed maturity investments as AFS, changes in the market value of our securities are reflected in shareholders’ equity. The remainder of our fixed maturity investments are held-to-maturity ("HTM") and carried at amortized cost. Our Board of Directors have established our investment policies and our executive management is implementing our investment strategy with the assistance of our investment managers. Although these guidelines stress diversification and capital preservation, our investment results will be subject to a variety of risks, including risks related to changes in the business, financial condition or results of operations of the entities in which we invest, as well as changes in general economic conditions and overall market conditions, interest rate fluctuations and market volatility. Given our reliance on external investment managers, we are also exposed to operational risks, which may include, but are not limited to, a failure of these managers to follow our investment policy guidelines, a failure to maintain proper internal controls, technological and staffing deficiencies and inadequate disaster recovery plans. Our investment portfolio consists almost completely of interest rate-sensitive instruments, such as bonds, which may be adversely affected by changes in interest rates. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary policies and domestic and international economic and political conditions and other factors beyond our control. Changes in interest rates could have an adverse effect on the value of our investment portfolio and future investment income. For example, changes in interest rates can expose us to prepayment risks on U.S. Government Agency mortgage-backed securities ("Agency MBS") included in our investment portfolio (all Agency MBS are currently "AA+" rated by S&P). Increases in interest rates will decrease the fair market value of our investments in fixed-income securities. If increases in interest rates occur during periods when we sell investments to satisfy liquidity needs, we may experience investment losses. In addition, a declining interest rate environment can result in reductions in our investment yield as new funds and proceeds from sales and maturities of fixed income securities are reinvested at lower rates. This reduces our overall profitability. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary policies, inflation, domestic and international economic and political conditions and other factors beyond our control. In order to limit our exposure to unexpected interest rate increases which would reduce the value of our fixed income securities and reduce our shareholders' equity, we attempt to maintain the duration of our fixed maturity investment portfolio combined with our cash and cash equivalents, both restricted and unrestricted, within a reasonable range of the duration of our loss reserves. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, these respective durations in years were as follows: For the Year Ended December 31, Fixed maturities and cash and cash equivalents Reserve for loss and LAE 2017 2016 4.4 3.6 4.9 3.8 The differential in duration between these assets and liabilities may fluctuate over time and in the case of fixed maturities, is affected by factors such as market conditions, asset allocations and prepayment speeds in the case of Agency MBS. We believe we have substantially mitigated our exposure to liquidity risk through prudent duration management and strong operating cash flow. We also have very limited property catastrophe exposures which could cause an immediate need for cash. However, if we do not structure our investment portfolio so that it is appropriately matched with our reinsurance liabilities or our operating cash flow declines, we may be forced to liquidate investments prior to maturity at a significant loss to cover such liabilities. For this or any of the other reasons discussed above, investment losses could significantly decrease our asset base, which would adversely affect our ability to conduct business. Any significant decline in our investment income would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The determination of the fair values of our investments and whether a decline in the fair value of an investment is other-than- temporary are based on management’s judgment and may prove to be incorrect. We hold a significant amount of assets without readily available, active, quoted market prices or for which fair value cannot be measured from actively quoted prices. These assets are generally deemed to require a higher degree of judgment used in 27 measuring fair value. The assumptions used by management to measure fair values could turn out to be wrong and the actual amounts that may be realized in an orderly transaction with a willing market participant could be either lower or higher than our estimates of fair value. We review our investment portfolio for factors that may indicate that a decline in the fair value of an investment is other-than-temporary. This evaluation is based on subjective factors, assumptions and estimates and may prove to be materially incorrect, which may result in us recognizing additional losses in the future as new information emerges or recognizing losses currently that may never materialize in the future in an orderly transaction with a willing market participant. We may require additional capital in the future, which may not be available on favorable terms or at all. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including our growth and our ability to write new business successfully and to establish premium rates and reserves at levels sufficient to cover our losses. While we have been successful to date in raising the capital necessary to prudently manage our business, future business needs are uncertain and we may need to raise additional funds to further capitalize Maiden Bermuda and Maiden US, or expand our IIS business. We anticipate that any such additional funds would be raised through equity, debt, hybrid financings or entering into retrocession agreements. While we currently have no commitment from any lender with respect to a credit facility or a loan facility, we may enter into an unsecured revolving credit facility or a term loan facility with one or more syndicates of lenders. Any equity, debt or hybrid financing, if available at all, may be on terms that are not favorable to us. If we are able to raise capital through equity financings, the interest of shareholders in our Company would be diluted, and the securities we issue may have rights, preferences and privileges that are senior to those of our common shares. Since we no longer have an S&P rating, this could impact our ability to obtain additional debt or hybrid capital at reasonable terms. Similarly, our access to funds may be impaired if regulatory authorities take negative actions against us. Our internal sources of liquidity may prove to be insufficient, and in such case, we may not be able to successfully obtain additional financing on favorable terms, or at all. In addition to company-specific factors, the availability of additional financing will depend on a variety of other factors such as market conditions, the general availability of capital, the volume of trading activities and the overall availability of capital to the financial services industry. As such, we may be forced to delay raising capital, issue shorter maturity securities than we prefer, or bear an unattractive cost of capital which could decrease our profitability and significantly reduce our financial flexibility. If we cannot obtain adequate capital, our business prospects, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected. We have debt and preference shares outstanding that could adversely affect our financial flexibility. In connection with the Senior Note Offerings, Maiden NA has issued Senior Notes in the principal amount of $152.5 million all of which is currently outstanding and is subject to a guarantee by Maiden Holdings. Maiden Holdings has issued Senior Notes in the principal amount of $110.0 million, all of which is currently outstanding. Maiden Holdings has also issued $630.0 million in Preference Shares since 2012, of which $465.0 million are outstanding at year-end, the dividends of which are required to be paid before common shareholders are eligible for dividend payments. We may also incur additional indebtedness in the future. The level of debt outstanding could adversely affect our financial flexibility. Our indebtedness could have adverse consequences, including: • • • • • • • limiting our ability to pay dividends to our common shareholders; limiting our subsidiaries to pay dividends; increasing our vulnerability to changing economic, regulatory and industry conditions; limiting our ability to compete and our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry; limiting our ability to borrow additional funds; requiring us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our debt, thereby, reducing funds available for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other purposes; and impacting rating agencies and regulators assessment of our capital position, adequacy and flexibility and therefore, the financial strength ratings of rating agencies and regulators assessment of our solvency. Our failure to comply with restrictive covenants contained in the indentures governing our Senior Notes or any future credit facility could trigger prepayment obligations, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. The indentures governing our Senior Notes contain covenants that impose restrictions on us and certain of our subsidiaries with respect to, among other things, the incurrence of liens and the disposition of capital stock of these subsidiaries. In addition, any future credit facility may require us and/or certain of our subsidiaries to comply with certain covenants, which may include the maintenance of a minimum consolidated net tangible worth and restrictions on the payment of dividends. Our failure to comply with these covenants could result in an event of default under the indentures or any future credit facility, which, if not cured or waived, could result in us being required to repay the notes or any amounts outstanding under such credit facility prior to maturity. As a result, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected. For more details on our indebtedness, see "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 7. Long-Term Debt" included under Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this Form 10-K. The Preference Shares are equity and are subordinate to our existing and future indebtedness and other liabilities. The Preference Shares are equity interests and do not constitute indebtedness. As such, the Preference Shares will rank junior to all of our indebtedness and other non-equity claims of our creditors with respect to assets available to satisfy the claims during liquidation. At December 31, 2017, our total consolidated debt, net of issuance cost was $254.5 million and our total consolidated liabilities were $5.4 billion. We may incur additional debt and liabilities in the future. Our existing and future indebtedness may 28 restrict payments of dividends on the Preference Shares. Additionally, unlike indebtedness, where principal and interest would customarily be payable on specified due dates, in the case of preference shares, dividends are payable only if declared by our Board of Directors (or a duly authorized committee of the Board). The availability and cost of security arrangements for reinsurance transactions may materially impact our ability to provide reinsurance from Bermuda to insurers domiciled in the U.S. Maiden Bermuda is not licensed, approved or accredited as a reinsurer anywhere else in the U.S., except Mexico (approved effective on January 17, 2018 until December 31, 2018), and, therefore, under the terms of most of its contracts with U.S. ceding companies, it is required to provide collateral to its ceding companies for unpaid ceded liabilities, including when our obligations to these ceding companies exceed negotiated amounts, in a form acceptable to state insurance commissioners. Typically, this type of collateral takes the form of letters of credit issued by a bank, the establishment of a trust, or funds withheld. The amount of collateral we are required to provide typically represents a portion of the obligations we may owe the ceding company. Since we may be required to provide collateral based on the ceding company's estimate, we may be obligated to provide collateral that exceeds our estimates of the ultimate liability to the ceding company. It is also unclear what, if any, the impact would be in the event of the liquidation of a ceding company with which we have a collateral arrangement. If these facilities are unavailable, not sufficient or if we are unable to arrange for other types of security on commercially acceptable terms, Maiden Bermuda’s ability to provide reinsurance to U.S. based clients may be severely limited. At December 31, 2017, 92.9% of the collateral provided by Maiden Bermuda was in the form of trusts. We may be adversely impacted by inflation. Our operations, like those of other property and casualty insurers and reinsurers, are susceptible to the effects of inflation because premiums are established before the ultimate amounts of loss and loss expense are known. Although we consider the potential effects of inflation when setting premium rates, our premiums may not fully offset the effects of inflation and essentially result in our underpricing the risks we insure and reinsure. Our reserve for losses and loss expenses includes assumptions about future payments for settlement of claims and claims handling expenses, such as the value of replacing property and associated labor costs for the property business we write, the value of medical treatments and litigation costs. To the extent inflation causes these costs to increase above reserves established for these claims, we will be required to increase our loss reserves with a corresponding reduction in our net income in the period in which the deficiency is identified, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. A decrease in the fair value of our subsidiaries and/or our intangible assets may result in future impairments. The determination of impairments taken on our investments, goodwill and other intangible assets and loans varies by type of asset and is based upon our periodic evaluation and assessment of known and inherent risks associated with the respective asset class. Such evaluations and assessments are revised as conditions change and new information becomes available. Management updates its evaluations regularly and reflects impairments in operations as such evaluations are revised. There can be no assurance that our management has accurately assessed the level of impairments taken in our financial statements. Furthermore, additional impairments may need to be taken in the future, which could materially impact our financial position or results of operations. Historical trends may not be indicative of future impairments. International Operations Our offices that operate in jurisdictions outside Bermuda and the U.S. are subject to certain limitations and risks that are unique to foreign operations. Our international operations are regulated in various jurisdictions with respect to licensing requirements, currency, reserves, employees and other matters. International operations may be harmed by political developments in foreign countries, which may be hard to predict in advance. Regulations governing technical reserves and remittance balances in some countries may hinder remittance of profits and repatriation of assets. Foreign currency fluctuations may reduce our net income and our capital levels adversely affecting our financial condition. We conduct business in a variety of non-U.S. currencies, the principal exposures being the euro, the British pound, the Canadian dollar and the Swedish krona. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are exposed to changes in currency exchange rates. Our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar, and exchange rate fluctuations relative to the U.S. dollar may materially impact our results of operations and financial position. Our principal exposure to foreign currency risk is our obligation to settle claims in foreign currencies. In addition, we maintain and expect to continue to maintain a portion of our investment portfolio in investments denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. While the Company may be able to match its foreign currency denominated assets against its net reinsurance liabilities both by currency and duration to protect the Company against foreign exchange and interest rate risks, a natural offset does not exist for all currencies. We may employ various strategies (including hedging) to manage our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk. To the extent that these exposures are not fully hedged or the hedges are ineffective, our results or equity may be reduced by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates that could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. At December 31, 2017, no such hedges or hedging strategies were in force or had been entered into. If the European common currency, the euro, were to be devalued, undergo structural changes or in an extreme scenario collapse, in its participating countries or the basis on which they participate, we could be impacted, potentially significantly by the subsequent effects of such a circumstance. We conduct business in countries in which the euro is the local currency. We report our financial results in U.S. dollars and use widely reported exchange rates to convert this currency into U.S. dollars. Countries whose currency is the euro have experienced significant economic uncertainty in recent years, which continues through the present time. These circumstances are the cumulative 29 result of the effect of excessive sovereign debt, deficits by numerous participating countries in the euro, uncertainty regarding the monetary policies of the EU and their underlying funding mechanisms and poor economic growth and prospects for the EU as a whole. While economic policy measures and commitments have stabilized the currency's volatility, the EU's fiscal outlook remains negative, and permanent solutions to resolve these issues by participating countries and other institutions to stabilize the EU and improve its economic outlook have not been resolved. Irrespective of the ultimate future of the currency, the impact of these efforts may cause a further deterioration in the value of the euro and consequently exacerbate instability in global credit markets, and increase credit concerns resulting in the widening of bond yield spreads. The impact of these developments, while potentially severe, remains extremely difficult to predict. However, should European governments default on their obligations, there will be a negative impact on government and non-government issued bonds, government guaranteed corporate bonds and bonds and equities issued by financial institutions and held within the country of default which in turn could adversely impact euro-denominated assets held in our investment portfolio. For the year ended December 31, 2017 and as at December 31, 2017, 7.5% of our net premiums written and 9.3% of our reserve for loss and LAE is euro denominated, respectively. At December 31, 2017 our fixed income portfolio contains: (1) $22.7 million of euro-denominated non-U.S. government and supranational bonds, which constitute 0.4% of the fixed income portfolio; and (2) $376.0 million of euro-denominated corporate bonds, which constitutes 7.3% of the fixed income portfolio. Of the euro- denominated non-U.S. government bonds, 52.0% were from the State of Israel. We hold no sovereign bonds of Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal or Spain. Regulation Compliance by our insurance subsidiaries with the legal and regulatory requirements to which they are subject is expensive. Any failure to comply could have a material adverse effect on our business. Our insurance subsidiaries are required to comply with a wide variety of laws and regulations applicable to insurance or reinsurance companies, both in the jurisdictions in which they are organized and where they sell their insurance and reinsurance products. The insurance and regulatory environment, in particular for offshore insurance and reinsurance companies, has become subject to increased scrutiny in many jurisdictions, including the U.S., various states within the U.S. and the EU. In the past, there have been Congressional and other initiatives in the U.S. regarding increased supervision and regulation of the insurance industry. It is not possible to predict the future impact of changes in laws and regulations on our operations. The cost of complying with any new legal requirements affecting our subsidiaries could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, our subsidiaries may not always be able to obtain or maintain necessary licenses, permits, authorizations or accreditations. They also may not be able to fully comply with, or to obtain appropriate exemptions from, the laws and regulations applicable to them. Any failure to comply with applicable law or to obtain appropriate exemptions could result in restrictions on either the ability of the company in question, as well as potentially its affiliates, to do business in one or more of the jurisdictions in which they operate or on brokers on which we rely to produce business for us. In addition, any such failure to comply with applicable laws or to obtain appropriate exemptions could result in the imposition of fines or other sanctions. Any of these sanctions could have a material adverse effect on our business. To date, no fine, penalty or restriction has been imposed on us for failure to comply with any insurance law or regulation. Insurance statutes and regulations in jurisdictions outside and inside the U.S. could affect our profitability and restrict our ability to operate. Maiden Bermuda is licensed as a Bermuda insurance company and is subject to regulation and supervision in Bermuda. The applicable Bermuda statutes and regulations generally are designed to protect insureds and ceding insurance companies, not our shareholders. Nevertheless, we expect that a large portion of the gross premiums written by Maiden Bermuda will be derived from (1) the Reinsurance Agreement with AII, and (2) from reinsurance contracts entered into with entities mostly domiciled in the U.S. and Europe. Inquiries into or challenges to the insurance activities of Maiden Bermuda may still be raised by U.S. or European insurance regulators in the future. In addition, even if Maiden Bermuda, as a reinsurer, is not directly regulated by applicable laws and regulations governing insurance in the jurisdictions where its ceding companies operate, these laws and regulations, and changes in them, can affect the profitability of the business that is ceded to Maiden Bermuda, and thereby affect our results of operations. The laws and regulations applicable to direct insurers could indirectly affect us in other ways as well, such as collateral requirements in various U.S. states to enable such insurers to receive credit for reinsurance ceded to us. In the past, there have been Congressional and other proposals in the U.S. regarding increased supervision and regulation of the insurance industry, including proposals to supervise and regulate reinsurers domiciled outside the U.S. Our exposure to potential regulatory initiatives could be heightened by the fact that Maiden Bermuda is intended to be domiciled in, and operate exclusively from, Bermuda. Bermuda is a small jurisdiction and may be disadvantaged when participating in global or cross-border regulatory matters compared with larger jurisdictions such as the U.S. or the leading EU countries. If Maiden Bermuda were to become subject to any insurance laws and regulations of the U.S. or any U.S. state, which are generally more restrictive than Bermuda laws and regulations, at any time in the future, it might be required to post deposits or maintain minimum surplus levels and might be prohibited from engaging in lines of business or from writing specified types of policies or contracts. Complying with those laws could have a material adverse effect on our ability to conduct business and on our financial condition and results of operations. In recent years, the state insurance regulatory framework in the U.S. has come under increased federal scrutiny, and some state legislatures have considered or enacted laws that may alter or increase state authority to regulate insurance and reinsurance companies and insurance holding companies. Further, the NAIC and state insurance regulators are re-examining existing laws and 30 regulations, specifically focusing on modifications to holding company regulations, interpretations of existing laws and the development of new laws. Any proposed or future legislation or NAIC initiatives may be more restrictive than current regulatory requirements or may result in higher costs. The BMA utilizes risk-based capital standards for insurance companies as a tool to assist the BMA both in measuring risk and in determining appropriate levels of capitalization. The amended Bermuda insurance statutes and regulations pursuant to the new risk-based supervisory approach required additional filings by insurers to be made to the BMA. The required statutory capital and surplus of our Bermuda-based operating subsidiary increased under the BSCR. While our Bermuda-based operating subsidiary currently has adequate capital and surplus under these new requirements, there can be no assurance that such requirement or similar regulations, in their current form or as may be amended in the future, will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations. The statutory credit afforded to certain aspects of our capital may change in the future. The components of our capital fall within various categories under Bermuda’s and other regulatory capital regimes, including Solvency II in Europe. Each of these categories is afforded different treatment and this treatment may change in the future. For example, the BMA has determined that our outstanding senior notes constitute Tier 2 capital through January 1, 2026 and our Series D Preference Shares constitute Tier 3 through January 1, 2026. Subsequent to that date in Bermuda, or at any time under another regulatory capital regime, these notes may not meet the requirements necessary to qualify as Tier 2 capital. It is possible also that the BMA’s regulatory capital framework will be amended or replaced in the future and there is no assurance that the notes will continue to qualify as Tier 2 Capital or basic own funds under any amended or replacement framework. If any of our capital fails to receive the treatment it does today, we may be required to raise additional capital that would be afforded the necessary treatment under the applicable regulatory capital regime. Any such capital raised would be subject to market and other conditions, and there can be no assurance that we would be able to raise such capital when needed. Europe Within the EU, the EU Reinsurance Directive of November 2005 (the "Directive") was adopted. Member states of the EU ("Member States") and the European Economic Area ("EEA") were required to implement this by December 2007, however, several Member States were late in the implementation of the Directive and, in a few cases, further legislation is still necessary. The Directive requires member countries to lift barriers to trade within the EU for companies that are domiciled in an EU country, therefore, allowing reinsurers established in the EU to provide services to all EEA states. As a result, Maiden LF, being established in Sweden and regulated by the Swedish Finansinspektionen ("Swedish FSA"), is able, subject to regulatory notifications and there being no objection from the Swedish FSA and the Member States concerned, to provide insurance and reinsurance services in all EEA Member States.The Directive also does not prohibit EEA insurers from obtaining reinsurance from reinsurers licensed outside the EEA. As such, and subject to the specific rules in particular Member States, Maiden Bermuda may do business from Bermuda with insurers in EEA Member States, but it may not directly operate its reinsurance business within the EEA. Currently, each individual EEA Member State may impose conditions on reinsurance provided by Bermuda based reinsurers which could restrict their future provision of reinsurance to the EEA Member State concerned. A number of EEA Member States currently restrict the extent to which Bermudian reinsurers may promote their services in those Member States, and a few have certain prohibitions on the purchase of insurance from reinsurers not authorized in the EEA. Solvency II was adopted by the European Parliament in April of 2009. The EU’s executive body, the European Commission ("EC") approved implementation of Solvency II with an effective start date of January 1, 2016. Solvency II is a principles-based regulatory regime which seeks to promote financial stability, enhance transparency and facilitate harmonization among insurance and reinsurance companies within the EU. Solvency II employs a risk-based approach to setting capital requirements for insurers and reinsurers. The Solvency II directive proposes that EU and non-EU reinsurers shall be treated in the same way provided that the non-EU jurisdiction is found to have a regulatory regime "equivalence" to that of Solvency II. Our reinsurance subsidiaries are headquartered in non-EU countries. If the regulatory regimes of such countries are found not to be equivalent to that of Solvency II and if our reinsurance subsidiaries fall below a certain minimum credit rating, then cedants in the EU may be prevented from recognizing the reinsurance provided to them by our reinsurance subsidiaries for the purpose of meeting their capital requirements or we may be required to provide additional collateral for our obligations to EU insurers. On November 26, 2015, the EC assessed the regulatory regime in Bermuda as being fully equivalent to Solvency II which was subsequently confirmed following a three month review period by the EC. United States In the U.S., licensed reinsurers are highly regulated and must comply with financial supervision standards comparable to those governing primary insurers. For additional discussion of the regulatory requirements to which Maiden Holdings, as a holding company, and its subsidiaries are subject, see Item 1 "Business — Regulatory Matters" in this Form 10-K. Any failure to comply with applicable laws could result in the imposition of significant restrictions on our ability to do business, and could also result in fines and other sanctions, any or all of which could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, these statutes and regulations may, in effect, restrict the ability of our subsidiaries to write new business or, as indicated below, distribute funds to Maiden Holdings. In recent years, some U.S. state legislatures have considered or enacted laws that may alter or increase state authority to regulate insurance companies and insurance holding companies. Moreover, the NAIC and state insurance regulators regularly re-examine existing laws and regulations and interpretations of existing laws and develop new laws. The new interpretations or laws may be more restrictive or may result in higher costs to us than current statutory requirements. In addition, the federal government has undertaken initiatives, including Dodd-Frank, in several areas that may impact the reinsurance industry, including tort reform, corporate governance and the taxation of reinsurance companies. Dodd-Frank became effective on July 21, 2011. In addition to introducing sweeping reform of the U.S. financial services industry, Dodd-Frank has changed the regulation of reinsurance in the U.S. Dodd-Frank prohibits a state from denying credit for reinsurance if the state of domicile of the insurer purchasing the reinsurance recognizes credit for reinsurance. At present, it appears the changes specific to 31 reinsurance in Dodd-Frank will not have a material adverse effect for non-U.S. reinsurers such as us, however, there is still significant uncertainty as to how these and other provisions of Dodd-Frank will be implemented in practice. Applicable insurance laws regarding the change of control of insurance companies may limit the acquisition of our shares. Under Bermuda law, for so long as Maiden Holdings has an insurance subsidiary registered under the Insurance Act, the BMA may at any time, by written notice, object to a person holding 10% or more of its common shares if it appears to the BMA that the person is not or is no longer fit and proper to be such a holder. In such a case, the BMA may require the shareholder to reduce its holding of common shares in Maiden Holdings and direct, among other things, that such shareholder’s voting rights attaching to the common shares shall not be exercisable. A person who does not comply with such a notice or direction from the BMA will be guilty of an offense and shall be liable if convicted on indictment, to a fine of $0.1 million and/or two years in prison. In addition, a person holding 10% or more of the company’s common shares is not permitted to reduce or dispose of its holdings such that the proportion of the voting rights held by the shareholder will reach or fall below 10%, 20%, 33% or 50%, as the case may be, unless that shareholder has served on the BMA a notice in writing that it intends to do so. A person who has reduced or disposed of his holding in the company, where the proportion of the voting rights held by him will have reached or has fallen below 10%, 20%, 33% or 50%, as the case may be, without notifying the BMA of their intention to do so will be guilty of an offense. This may discourage potential acquisition proposals and may delay, deter or prevent a change of control of our Company, including through transactions, and in particular unsolicited transactions, that some or all of our shareholders might consider to be desirable. In addition to the foregoing, we are subject to U.S. state statutes governing insurance holding companies, which generally require that any person or entity desiring to acquire direct or indirect control of any of our U.S. insurance company subsidiaries obtain prior regulatory approval. "Control" is generally defined as the possession, direct or indirect, of the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and policies of the company, whether through the ownership of voting securities, by contract (except a commercial contract for goods or non-management services) or otherwise. Under the laws of most U.S. states, any beneficial owner of 10% or more of the outstanding voting securities of an insurance company or its holding company is presumed to have acquired control, unless this presumption is rebutted. These laws may also discourage potential acquisition proposals and may delay, deter or prevent a change of control of our Company, including through transactions, and in particular unsolicited transactions, that some or all of our shareholders might consider to be desirable. Any person having a shareholding of 10% or more of the issued share capital in Maiden Holdings would be considered to have an indirect holding in our U.S. insurance subsidiaries at or over the 10% limit. Any change that resulted in the indirect acquisition or disposal of a shareholding of greater than or equal to 10% in the share capital of Maiden Holdings may require approval of the relevant U.S. state insurance regulators prior to the transaction. Changes in accounting principles and financial reporting requirements could result in material changes to our reported results of operations and financial condition. U.S. GAAP and related financial reporting requirements are complex, continually evolving and may be subject to varied interpretation by the relevant authoritative bodies. Such varied interpretations could result from differing views related to specific facts and circumstances. Changes in U.S. GAAP and financial reporting requirements, or in the interpretation of U.S. GAAP or those requirements, could result in material changes to our reported results and financial condition. Employee Issues We are dependent on our key executives. We may not be able to attract and retain key employees or successfully integrate our new management team to fully implement our newly formulated business strategy. Our success depends largely on our senior management, which includes, among others, Arturo M. Raschbaum, our President and CEO, Karen L. Schmitt, our CFO, Thomas H. Highet, our President of Maiden US, Patrick J. Haveron, our Executive Vice President and President of Maiden Bermuda, and Lawrence F. Metz, our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. We have entered into employment agreements with each of these executive officers, as well as other key employees. Our inability to attract and retain additional personnel or the loss of the services of any of our senior executives or key employees could delay or prevent us from fully implementing our business strategy and could significantly and negatively affect our business. Our business in Bermuda could be adversely affected by Bermuda employment restrictions. Currently, we employ eighteen non-Bermudians in our Bermuda office including our President and CEO, our CFO, Maiden Bermuda's President and Maiden Bermuda's Chief Underwriting Officer. We may hire additional non-Bermudians as our business grows. Under Bermuda law, non-Bermudians (other than spouses of Bermudians, holders of permanent residents’ certificates and holders of working residents’ certificates) may not engage in any gainful occupation in Bermuda without a valid government work permit. A work permit may be granted or renewed upon showing that, after proper public advertisement, no Bermudian, spouse of a Bermudian, or holder of a permanent resident’s or working resident’s certificate who meets the minimum standards reasonably required by the employer has applied for the job. Work permits are issued with expiry dates that range from one, three, five, six or, in certain circumstances for key executives, ten years. We may not be able to use the services of one or more of our non- Bermudian employees if we are not able to obtain work permits for them, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Corporate Governance Our holding company structure and certain regulatory and other constraints affect our ability to pay dividends and make other payments. Maiden Holdings is a holding company. As a result, we do not have, and will not have, any significant operations or assets other than our ownership of the shares of our subsidiaries. 32 We expect that dividends and other permitted distributions from Maiden Bermuda, Maiden Global (and its subsidiaries), Maiden LF and Maiden NA (and its subsidiaries) will be our sole source of funds to pay dividends to common and preference shareholders and meet ongoing cash requirements, including debt service payments, if any, and other expenses. The inability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends in an amount sufficient to enable us to meet our cash requirements at the holding company level could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. We are also subject to Bermuda regulatory constraints that will affect our ability to pay dividends on our shares and make other payments. Under the Companies Act, we may declare or pay a dividend out of distributable reserves only if we have reasonable grounds for believing that we are, or would after the payment be, able to pay our liabilities as they become due and if the realizable value of our assets would thereby not be less than our liabilities. The timing and amount of any cash dividends on our common shares are at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend upon result of operations and cash flows, our financial position and capital requirements, and any other factors that our Board of Directors deems relevant. A few significant shareholders may influence or control the direction of our business. If the ownership of our common shares continues to be highly concentrated, it may limit your ability and the ability of other shareholders to influence significant corporate decisions. The interests of our Founding Shareholders may not be fully aligned with our interests, and this may lead to a strategy that is not in our best interest. Although they do not have any voting agreements or arrangements, our Founding Shareholders could exercise significant influence over matters requiring shareholder approval, and their concentrated holdings may delay or deter possible changes in control of Maiden Holdings, which may reduce the market price of our common shares. Dividends on the Series A, Series C and Series D Preference Shares are non-cumulative. Dividends on the Series A, Series C and Series D Preference Shares are non-cumulative and payable only out of lawfully available funds of Maiden Holdings under Bermuda law. Consequently, if our Board of Directors (or a duly authorized committee of the Board) does not authorize and declare a dividend for any dividend period with respect to the Series A, Series C and Series D Preference Shares, holders of the Series A, Series C and Series D Preference Shares would not be entitled to receive any such dividend, and such unpaid dividend will not accumulate and will never be payable. We will have no obligation to pay dividends for a dividend period on or after the dividend payment date for such period if the Board of Directors (or a duly authorized committee of the Board) has not declared such dividend before the related dividend payment date. If dividends on the Series A, Series C and Series D Preference Shares are authorized and declared with respect to any subsequent dividend period, we will be free to pay dividends on any other series of preference shares and/or our common shares. Under Bermuda law, we will not be permitted to pay dividends on the Preference Shares (even if such dividends have been previously declared) if there are reasonable grounds for believing that we are, or would after the payment be, unable to pay our liabilities as they become due; or the realizable value of our assets would thereby be less than our liabilities or that we are or would after such payment be in breach of the Insurance Act, Insurance (Prudential Standards) Class 4 and Class 3B Solvency Requirement Rules 2008, the Insurance (Prudential Standards) (Insurance Group Solvency Requirement) Rules 2011, including the enhanced capital requirement or the group enhanced capital requirement contained within such rules or under such other applicable rules and regulations as may from time to time be issued by the BMA (or any successor agency or then-applicable regulatory authority) pursuant to the terms of the Insurance Act, or any successor legislation. Our revenues and results of operations may fluctuate as a result of factors beyond our control, which may cause the price of our shares to be volatile. The revenues and results of operations of reinsurance companies historically have been subject to significant fluctuations and uncertainties. Our profitability can be affected significantly by: • fluctuations in interest rates, inflationary pressures and other changes in the investment environment that affect returns on invested assets; • changes in the frequency or severity of claims; • volatile and unpredictable developments, including man-made, weather-related and other natural catastrophes or terrorist attacks; • price competition; • inadequate loss and LAE reserves; • cyclical nature of the property and casualty insurance market; • negative developments in the specialty property and casualty reinsurance sectors in which we operate; and • reduction in the business activities of AmTrust or any of our ceding insurers. These factors may cause the price of the Company's shares to be volatile. Future sales of shares may adversely affect their price. Future sales of our common shares by our shareholders or us, or the perception that such sales may occur, could adversely affect the market price of our common shares. As of February 20, 2018, 83,007,351 common shares were outstanding. In addition, we have reserved 10,000,000 common shares for issuance under our Amended and Restated 2007 Share Incentive Plan. As of February 20, 2018, the total options outstanding was 1,512,269. Sales of substantial amounts of our shares, or the perception that 33 such sales could occur, could adversely affect the prevailing price of the shares and may make it more difficult for us to sell our equity securities in the future, or for shareholders to sell their shares, at a time and price that they deem appropriate. Provisions in our bye-laws may reduce or increase the voting rights of our shares. In general, and except as provided under our bye-laws and as provided below, the common shareholders have one vote for each common share held by them and are entitled to vote, on a non-cumulative basis, at all meetings of shareholders. However, if, and so long as, the shares of a shareholder are treated as "controlled shares" (as determined pursuant to Sections 957 and 958 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "IRS Code")) of any U.S. Person (as that term is defined in the risk factors under the section captioned "Taxation" within this Item on page 37 that owns shares directly or indirectly through non-U.S. entities) and such controlled shares constitute 9.5% or more of the votes conferred by our issued shares, the voting rights with respect to the controlled shares owned by such U.S. Person will be limited, in the aggregate, to a voting power of less than 9.5%, under a formula specified in our bye-laws. The formula is applied repeatedly until the voting power of all 9.5% U.S. Shareholders has been reduced to less than 9.5%. In addition, our board may limit a shareholder’s voting rights when it deems it appropriate to do so to (i) avoid the existence of any 9.5% U.S. Shareholder; and (ii) avoid certain material adverse tax, legal or regulatory consequences to us, to any of our subsidiaries or any direct or indirect shareholder or its affiliates. "Controlled shares" include, among other things, all shares that a U.S. Person is deemed to own directly, indirectly or constructively (within the meaning of section 958 of the IRS Code). The amount of any reduction of votes that occurs by operation of the above limitations will generally be reallocated proportionately among our other shareholders whose shares were not "controlled shares" of the 9.5% U.S. Shareholder so long as such reallocation does not cause any person to become a 9.5% U.S. Shareholder. Under these provisions, certain shareholders may have their voting rights limited, while other shareholders may have voting rights in excess of one vote per share. Moreover, these provisions could have the effect of reducing the votes of certain shareholders who would not otherwise be subject to the 9.5% limitation by virtue of their direct share ownership. We are authorized under our bye-laws to request information from any shareholder for the purpose of determining whether a shareholder’s voting rights are to be reallocated under the bye-laws. If any holder fails to respond to this request or submits incomplete or inaccurate information, we may, in our sole discretion, eliminate or adjust the shareholder’s voting rights. Anti-takeover provisions in our bye-laws could impede an attempt to replace or remove our directors, which could diminish the value of our common shares. Our bye-laws contain provisions that may entrench directors and make it more difficult for shareholders to replace directors even if the shareholders consider it beneficial to do so. In addition, these provisions could delay or prevent a change of control that a shareholder might consider favorable. For example, these provisions may prevent a shareholder from receiving the benefit from any premium over the market price of our common shares offered by a bidder in a potential takeover. Even in the absence of an attempt to effect a change in management or a takeover attempt, these provisions may adversely affect the prevailing market price of our common shares if they are viewed as discouraging changes in management and takeover attempts in the future. Examples of provisions in our bye-laws that could have such an effect include the following: • our Board of Directors may reduce the total voting power of any shareholder in order to avoid adverse tax, legal or regulatory consequences to us or any direct or indirect holder of our shares or its affiliates; and • our Directors may, in their discretion, decline to record the transfer of any common shares on our share register, if they are not satisfied that all required regulatory approvals for such transfer have been obtained or if they determine such transfer may result in a non-de minimis adverse tax, legal or regulatory consequence to us or any direct or indirect holder of shares or its affiliates. It may be difficult for a third party to acquire us. Provisions of our organizational documents may discourage, delay or prevent a merger, amalgamation, tender offer or other change of control that holders of our shares may consider favorable. These provisions impose various procedural and other requirements that could make it more difficult for shareholders to effect various corporate actions. These provisions could: • have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us; • discourage bids for our securities at a premium over the market price; • adversely affect the price of, and the voting and other rights of the holders of our securities; or • impede the ability of the holders of our securities to change our management. In addition, AII, AEL and AIUL are entitled to terminate their quota share agreements if we undergo a change in control. Because we expect the business we reinsure from AmTrust to constitute a substantial portion of our business, this termination right may deter parties who are interested in acquiring us, may prevent shareholders from receiving a premium over the market price of our common shares and may depress the price of our common shares below levels that might otherwise prevail. U.S. persons who own our shares may have more difficulty in protecting their interests than U.S. persons who are shareholders of a U.S. corporation. The Companies Act, which applies to us, differs in certain material respects from laws generally applicable to U.S. corporations and their shareholders. As a result of these differences, U.S. persons who own our shares may have more difficulty protecting their interests than U.S. persons who own shares of a U.S. corporation. Set forth below is a summary of certain significant provisions of the Companies Act, including modifications adopted pursuant to our bye-laws, applicable to us which differ in certain respects from provisions of Delaware corporate law. Because the following statements are summaries, they do not discuss all aspects of Bermuda law that may be relevant to us and our shareholders. 34 Interested Directors. Bermuda law provides that if a director has a personal interest in a transaction to which the company is also a party and if the director discloses the nature of this personal interest at the first opportunity, either at a meeting of directors or in writing to the directors, then the company will not be able to declare the transaction void solely due to the existence of that personal interest and the director will not be liable to the company for any profit realized from the transaction. In addition, Bermuda law and our bye-laws provide that, after a director has made the declaration of interest referred to above, he is allowed to be counted for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present and to vote on a transaction in which he has an interest, unless disqualified from doing so by the chairman of the relevant board meeting. Under Delaware law such transaction would not be voidable if: • the material facts as to such interested director’s relationship or interests are disclosed or are known to the board of directors and the board in good faith authorizes the transaction by the affirmative vote of a majority of the disinterested directors; • such material facts are disclosed or are known to the shareholders entitled; • to vote on such transaction and the transaction is specifically approved in good faith by vote of the majority of shares entitled to vote thereon; or • the transaction is fair as to the corporation as of the time it is authorized, approved or ratified. Under Delaware law, such interested director could be held liable for a transaction in which such director derived an improper personal benefit. Mergers and Similar Arrangements. The amalgamation or merger of a Bermuda company with another company or corporation (other than certain affiliated companies) requires the amalgamation agreement to be approved by the company’s board of directors and by its shareholders. Under our bye-laws, we may, with the approval of a majority of votes cast at a general meeting of our shareholders at which a quorum is present, amalgamate or merge with another Bermuda company or with a body incorporated outside Bermuda. In the case of an amalgamation or merger, a shareholder may apply to a Bermuda court for a proper valuation of such shareholder’s shares if such shareholder is not satisfied that fair value has been paid for such shares. Under Delaware law, with certain exceptions, a merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all the assets of a corporation must be approved by the board of directors and a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote thereon. Under Delaware law, a shareholder of a corporation participating in certain major corporate transactions may, under certain circumstances, be entitled to appraisal rights pursuant to which such shareholder may receive cash in the amount of the fair value of the shares held by such shareholder (as determined by a court) in lieu of the consideration such shareholder would otherwise receive in the transaction. Shareholders’ Suit. The rights of shareholders under Bermuda law are not as extensive as the rights of shareholders under legislation or judicial precedent in many U.S. jurisdictions. Class actions and derivative actions are generally not available to shareholders under the laws of Bermuda. However, the Bermuda courts ordinarily would be expected to follow English case law precedent, which would permit a shareholder to commence an action in the name of the company to remedy a wrong done to the company where the act complained of is alleged to be beyond the corporate power of the company, is illegal or would result in the violation of our memorandum of association or bye-laws. Furthermore, consideration would be given by the court to acts that are alleged to constitute a fraud against the minority shareholders or where an act requires the approval of a greater percentage of our shareholders than actually approved it. The winning party in such an action generally would be able to recover a portion of attorneys’ fees incurred in connection with such action. Our bye-laws provide that shareholders waive all claims or rights of action that they might have, individually or in the right of the company, against any director or officer for any act or failure to act in the performance of such director’s or officer’s duties, except with respect to any fraud or dishonesty of such director or officer. Class actions and derivative actions generally are available to shareholders under Delaware law for, among other things, breach of fiduciary duty, corporate waste and actions not taken in accordance with applicable law. In such actions, the court has discretion to permit the winning party to recover attorneys’ fees incurred in connection with such action. Indemnification of Directors. We may indemnify our directors or officers in their capacity as directors or officers of any loss arising or liability attaching to them by virtue of any rule of law in respect of any negligence, default, breach of duty or breach of trust of which a director or officer may be guilty in relation to the company other than in respect of his own fraud or dishonesty. Under Delaware law, a corporation may indemnify a director or officer of the corporation against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred in defense of an action, suit or proceeding by reason of such position if such director or officer acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed to be in or not opposed to the best interests of the corporation and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, such director or officer had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful. In addition, we have entered into indemnification agreements with our directors and officers. We are a Bermuda company and it may be difficult for you to enforce judgments against us or our directors and executive officers. We are incorporated under the laws of Bermuda and our business is based in Bermuda. In addition, most of our directors and officers reside outside Bermuda and a substantial portion of our assets will be and the assets of these persons are, and will continue to be, located in jurisdictions outside Bermuda. As such, it may be difficult or impossible to effect service of process within the U.S. upon us or those persons or to recover against us or them on judgments of U.S. courts, including judgments predicated upon civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws. Further, no claim may be brought in Bermuda against us or our directors and officers in the first instance for violation of U.S. federal securities laws because these laws have no extraterritorial jurisdiction under Bermuda law and do not have force of law in Bermuda. A Bermuda court may, however, impose civil liability, including the possibility of monetary damages, on us or our directors and officers if the facts alleged in a complaint constitute or give rise to a cause of action under Bermuda law. We have been previously advised by Conyers Dill & Pearman Limited, our Bermuda counsel, that there is doubt as to whether the courts of Bermuda would enforce judgments of U.S. courts obtained in actions against us or our directors and officers, as well 35 as the experts named in this Report, predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws or original actions brought in Bermuda against us or these persons predicated solely upon U.S. federal securities laws. Further, we have been advised by Conyers Dill & Pearman Limited that there is no treaty in effect between the U.S. and Bermuda providing for the enforcement of judgments of U.S. courts, and there are grounds upon which Bermuda courts may not enforce judgments of U.S. courts. Some remedies available under the laws of U.S. jurisdictions, including some remedies available under the U.S. federal securities laws, may not be allowed in Bermuda courts as contrary to that jurisdiction’s public policy. Because judgments of U.S. courts are not automatically enforceable in Bermuda, it may be difficult for you to recover against us based upon such judgments. Relationship with AmTrust We are dependent on AmTrust and its subsidiaries for a substantial portion of our business. AmTrust is Maiden’s largest client relationship and we will continue to derive a substantial portion of our business from AmTrust in the near term. For the year ended December 31, 2017, 70.8% of the consolidated gross premiums written by the Company were from AmTrust. We commenced our reinsurance business by providing traditional quota share reinsurance to AmTrust through the Reinsurance Agreement with AmTrust’s Bermuda reinsurance subsidiary, AII, assuming initially a 40% quota share portion of the net liabilities less recoveries of certain lines of business that existed on the effective date. In 2011, we provided additional quota share reinsurance through the European Hospital Liability Quota Share which is a separate one-year, renewable, 40% quota share agreement with AEL and AIUL. The European Hospital Liability Quota Share covers those entities' medical liability business in Europe, all of which is in Italy and France at the present time. We are still dependent, however, on AmTrust and its subsidiaries for a substantial portion of our business and underwriting income. Our Reinsurance Agreement with AII has been renewed for an additional three years (until July 1, 2019), subject to certain early termination provisions (including if the A.M. Best rating of Maiden Bermuda is reduced below "A-"). The Reinsurance Agreement will be extended for additional terms of three years unless either party elects not to renew. There is no assurance that this agreement will not terminate. The termination of the Reinsurance Agreement would significantly reduce our revenues and could have a material adverse effect on us. At the same time, there are risks related to the business of AmTrust and its insurance subsidiaries that may adversely impact our ability to continue doing business with them. In addition, we are not able to control the types or amounts of reinsurance AmTrust purchases from unaffiliated reinsurers, and any changes AmTrust makes to such reinsurance may affect our profitability and ability to write additional business. Our initial arrangements with AmTrust were negotiated while we were its affiliate. The arrangements could be challenged as not reflecting terms that we would agree to in arm’s-length negotiations with an independent third party; moreover, our business relationship with AmTrust and its subsidiaries may present, and may make us vulnerable to, possible adverse tax consequences, difficult conflicts of interest, and legal claims that we have not acted in the best interest of our shareholders. We entered into a quota share agreement with AII, which reinsures AmTrust’s insurance company subsidiaries, and a Master Agreement with AmTrust, pursuant to which Maiden Bermuda entered into the quota share agreement. Because (i) Leah Karfunkel (wife of Michael Karfunkel), George Karfunkel and Barry Zyskind (the Company's non-executive chairman) collectively own or control approximately 42.7% of the outstanding common shares of AmTrust, (ii) our Founding Shareholders sponsored our formation, and (iii) based on each individual's most recent public filing as of December 31, 2017, Leah Karfunkel owns or controls approximately 8.2% of the outstanding shares of the Company and Barry Zyskind owns or controls approximately 7.7% of the outstanding shares of the Company (George Karfunkel now owns or controls less than 5.0% of the outstanding shares of the Company so there is no longer a public filing requirement); we, therefore, may be deemed an affiliate of AmTrust. Due to our close business relationship with AmTrust, we may be presented with situations involving conflicts of interest with respect to the agreements and other arrangements we will enter into with AmTrust and its subsidiaries, exposing us to possible claims that we have not acted in the best interest of our shareholders. The arrangements between us and AmTrust were modified somewhat after they were originally entered into and there could be future modifications. Our non-executive Chairman of the Board currently holds the positions of President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of AmTrust, These dual positions may present, and make us vulnerable to, difficult conflicts of interest and related legal challenges. Barry Zyskind, our non-executive Chairman of the Board, is the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of AmTrust and, as such, he does not serve our Company on a full-time basis. Mr. Zyskind is expected to continue in both of his positions for the foreseeable future. Conflicts of interest could arise with respect to business opportunities that could be advantageous to AmTrust or its subsidiaries, on the one hand, and us or our subsidiary, on the other hand. In addition, potential conflicts of interest may arise should the interests of Maiden Holdings and AmTrust diverge. As AmTrust is currently our largest customer, after being our only significant customer until November 2008, and is also expected to remain our largest customer for at least the next several years, AmTrust could have the ability to significantly influence such situations. However, the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors, which consists entirely of independent directors, does review and approve all related party transactions. Collateral has been provided to AmTrust, AII and AEL in the form of trusts, letters of credit and a loan. As a result of our use of trust accounts, letters of credit and a loan, a substantial portion of our assets will not be available to us for other uses, which could reduce our financial flexibility. If further collateral is required to be provided to any other AmTrust insurance company subsidiaries under applicable law or regulatory requirements, Maiden Bermuda will provide collateral to the extent required. At December 31, 2017, $3.8 billion was provided as collateral to AmTrust, AII and AEL in the form of trusts, letters of credit and a loan. Maiden Bermuda is not a party to the reinsurance agreements between AII and AmTrust’s U.S. insurance subsidiaries or the related reinsurance trust agreements and has no rights thereunder. If one or more of these AmTrust subsidiaries withdraws Maiden Bermuda’s assets from their trust account or misapplies withheld funds that are due to Maiden Bermuda and that subsidiary is or 36 becomes insolvent, we believe it may be more difficult for Maiden Bermuda to recover any such amounts to which we are entitled than it would be if Maiden Bermuda had entered into reinsurance and trust agreements with these AmTrust subsidiaries directly. AII has agreed to immediately return to Maiden Bermuda any collateral provided by Maiden Bermuda that one of those subsidiaries improperly utilizes or retains, and AmTrust has agreed to guarantee AII’s repayment obligation and AII’s payment obligations under its loan agreement with Maiden Bermuda. We are subject to the risk that AII and/or AmTrust may be unable or unwilling to discharge these obligations. In addition, if AII experiences a change in control and Maiden Bermuda chooses not to terminate the Reinsurance Agreement, AmTrust’s guarantee obligations will terminate immediately and automatically. We will not be able to control AmTrust’s decisions relating to its other reinsurance, and AmTrust may change its reinsurance in ways that could adversely affect us. The reinsurance ceded by AmTrust is net of any reinsurance that AmTrust obtains from unaffiliated reinsurers. For example, Maiden Bermuda will receive 40% of AmTrust’s premiums net of reinsurance with unaffiliated reinsurers relating to certain lines of business that existed on the effective date and will be liable for 40% of loss and LAE on these certain lines of ceded business net of any reinsurance recoverable (whether collectible or not) from unaffiliated reinsurers. We are not able to control the types or amounts of reinsurance that AmTrust purchases from unaffiliated reinsurers. If AmTrust chose to purchase additional reinsurance from unaffiliated reinsurers, AmTrust would reduce the premium revenue ceded to us. The purchase of such additional reinsurance would, however, in general inure to our benefit. Taxation We may become subject to taxes in Bermuda after 2035, which may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results and on an investment in our shares. The Bermuda Minister of Finance, under the Exempted Undertakings Tax Protection Act 1966, as amended, of Bermuda, has given each of Maiden Holdings and Maiden Bermuda an assurance that if any legislation is enacted in Bermuda that would impose tax computed on profits or income, or computed on any capital asset, gain or appreciation, or any tax in the nature of estate duty or inheritance tax, then the imposition of any such tax will not be applicable to Maiden Holdings, Maiden Bermuda or any of their respective operations or their respective shares, debentures or other obligations (except insofar as such tax applies to persons ordinarily resident in Bermuda or to any taxes payable by them in respect of real property or leasehold interests in Bermuda held by them) until March 31, 2035. Given the limited duration of the Minister of Finance’s expected assurance, we cannot be certain that we will not be subject to any Bermuda tax after March 31, 2035. Since Maiden Holdings and Maiden Bermuda are incorporated in Bermuda, we will be subject to changes in law or regulation in Bermuda that may have an adverse impact on our operations, including imposition of tax liability. The financial results of our operations may be affected by measures taken in relation to Bermuda in response to the OECD Base Erosion and Profit Shifting ("BEPS") project. The OECD has published reports and launched a global dialog among member and non-member countries on measures to limit harmful tax competition. These measures are largely directed at counteracting the effects of jurisdictions perceived by the OECD to be tax havens or offering preferential tax regimes. The OECD has not listed Bermuda as an uncooperative tax haven jurisdiction because Bermuda has committed to eliminating harmful tax practices and to embracing international tax standards for transparency, exchange of information and the elimination of any aspects of the regimes for financial and other services that attract business with no substantial domestic activity. We are not able to predict what changes will arise from the commitment or whether such changes will subject us to additional taxes. In addition, in 2015, the OECD published its final series of BEPS reports related to its attempt to coordinate multilateral action on international tax rules. The proposed actions include an examination of the definition of a “permanent establishment” and the rules for attributing profit to a permanent establishment. One of these reports covers “country-by-country” reporting, which calls for the provision, at a country-specific level, of information such as affiliate and non- affiliate revenues, profit or loss before tax, income taxes paid and accrued, capital, number of employees and tangible assets. It is expected that some countries, including some EU countries, would deem a failure to implement country-by-country reporting to be sufficient rationale to place another country on a “black-list”, thus potentially restricting in some way business between the two countries. Bermuda has agreed to implement country-by-country reporting in 2016 for 2017 reporting. The implementation and ongoing requirements of country-by-country reporting will require significant management time and resources. Although we believe Bermuda’s agreement to implement country-by-country reporting has reduced the likelihood that Bermuda would appear on a “black-list”, some uncertainty remains. Any changes in the tax law of an OECD member state in response to the BEPS reports and recommendations could subject us to additional taxes. Our operations may be affected by the introduction of an EU financial transaction tax ("FTT"). On February 14, 2013, the EU Commission published a proposal for a Directive for a common FTT in those EU Member States which choose to participate (''the FTT Zone"), currently Belgium, Germany, Greece, Spain, France, Italy, Austria, Portugal, Slovenia and Slovakia. Currently this proposal is on hold pending the final outcome of the Brexit negotiations. The proposed FTT has broad scope and would apply to financial transactions where at least one party to the transaction is established in the FTT Zone and either that party or another party is a financial institution established in the FTT Zone. "Financial institution" covers a wide range of entities, including insurance and reinsurance undertakings. "Financial transaction" includes the sale and purchase of a financial instrument, a transfer of risk associated with a financial instrument and the conclusion or modification of a derivative. The proposed minimum rate of tax is 0.1% of the consideration, or 0.01% of the notional amount in relation to a derivative. A financial institution may be deemed to be "established" in the FTT Zone even if it has no business presence there, if the underlying financial instrument is issued in the FTT Zone. The FTT proposal remains subject to negotiation between the participating EU Member States. It may therefore be altered prior to any implementation, the timing of which remains unclear. The introduction of FTT in this or similar form could have an adverse effect on the Company's economic performance. 37 We may be subject to U.S. federal income tax, which would have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations and on an investment in our shares. If either Maiden Holdings or Maiden Bermuda were considered to be engaged in a trade or business in the U.S., it could be subject to U.S. federal income and additional branch profits taxes on the portion of its earnings that are effectively connected to such U.S. business or in the case of Maiden Bermuda, if it is entitled to benefits under the U.S. income tax treaty with Bermuda and if Maiden Bermuda were considered engaged in a trade or business in the U.S. through a permanent establishment, Maiden Bermuda could be subject to U.S. federal income tax on the portion of its earnings that are attributable to its permanent establishment in the U.S., in which case its results of operations could be materially adversely affected. Maiden Holdings and Maiden Bermuda are Bermuda companies. We intend to manage our business so that each of these companies should operate in such a manner that neither of these companies should be treated as engaged in a U.S. trade or business and, thus, should not be subject to U.S. federal taxation (other than the U.S. federal excise tax on insurance and reinsurance premium income attributable to insuring or reinsuring U.S. risks and U.S. federal withholding tax on certain U.S. source investment income). However, because (i) there is considerable uncertainty as to activities which constitute being engaged in a trade or business within the U.S.; (ii) a significant portion of Maiden Bermuda’s business is reinsurance of AmTrust’s insurance subsidiaries; (iii) our non-executive Chairman of the Board is AmTrust’s President and Chief Executive Officer, and one of our directors is related to a significant shareholder of AmTrust; (iv) the family of one of our Founding Shareholders, Michael Karfunkel, controls NGHC, and (v) we have an asset management agreement with a subsidiary of AmTrust and may also have additional contractual relationships with AmTrust and its subsidiaries in the future, we cannot be certain that the IRS will not contend successfully that we are engaged in a trade or business in the U.S. U.S. Persons who hold our shares may be subject to U.S. federal income taxation at ordinary income rates on their proportionate share of Maiden Bermuda’s related person insurance income. If U.S. persons are treated as owning 25% or more of Maiden Bermuda’s shares (by vote or by value) (as is expected to be the case) and the RPII of Maiden Bermuda (determined on a gross basis) were to equal or exceed 20% of Maiden Bermuda’s gross insurance income in any taxable year and direct or indirect insureds (and persons related to those insureds) own directly or indirectly through entities 20% or more of the voting power or value of our shares, then a U.S. Person who owns any shares of Maiden Bermuda (directly or indirectly through non-U.S. entities) on the last day of the taxable year would be required to include in its income for U.S. federal income tax purposes such person’s pro rata share of Maiden Bermuda’s RPII for the entire taxable year, determined as if such RPII were distributed proportionately only to U.S. Persons at that date, regardless of whether such income is distributed. In addition, any RPII that is includible in the income of a U.S. tax-exempt organization generally will be treated as unrelated business taxable income. The amount of RPII earned by Maiden Bermuda (generally, premium and related investment income from the direct or indirect insurance or reinsurance of any direct or indirect U.S. holder of shares or any person related to such holder) will depend on a number of factors, including the identity of persons directly or indirectly insured or reinsured by Maiden Bermuda. At December 31, 2017, we believe that either (i) the direct or indirect insureds of Maiden Bermuda (and related persons) should not directly or indirectly own 20% or more of either the voting power or value of our shares or (ii) the RPII (determined on a gross basis) of Maiden Bermuda should not equal or exceed 20% of Maiden Bermuda’s gross insurance income for the taxable year ended December 31, 2017 and we do not expect both of these thresholds to be exceeded in the foreseeable future. However, we cannot be certain that this will be the case because some of the factors which determine the extent of RPII may be beyond our control. U.S. Persons who dispose of our shares may be subject to U.S. federal income taxation at the rates applicable to dividends on a portion of their gains if any. The RPII rules provide that if a U.S. Person disposes of shares in a non-U.S. insurance corporation in which U.S. Persons own 25% or more of the shares (even if the amount of gross RPII is less than 20% of the corporation’s gross insurance income and the ownership of its shares by direct or indirect insureds and related persons is less than the 20% threshold), any gain from the disposition will generally be treated as a dividend to the extent of the holder’s share of the corporation’s undistributed earnings and profits that were accumulated during the period that the holder owned the shares (whether or not such earnings and profits are attributable to RPII). In addition, such a holder will be required to comply with certain reporting requirements, regardless of the amount of shares owned by the holder. These RPII rules should not apply to dispositions of our shares because Maiden Holdings will not be directly engaged in the insurance business. The RPII provisions, however, have never been interpreted by the courts or the U.S. Treasury Department in final regulations, and regulations interpreting the RPII provisions of the Code exist only in proposed form. It is not certain whether these regulations will be adopted in their proposed form or what changes or clarifications might ultimately be made thereto or whether any such changes, as well as any interpretation or application of the RPII rules by the IRS, the courts, or otherwise, might have retroactive effect. The U.S. Treasury Department has authority to impose, among other things, additional reporting requirements with respect to RPII. Accordingly, the meaning of the RPII provisions and the application thereof to Maiden Holdings and Maiden Bermuda is uncertain. U.S. Persons who hold our shares will be subject to adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences if Maiden Holdings is considered to be a passive foreign investment company. If Maiden Holdings is considered a passive foreign investment company, or a PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, a U.S. Person who owns directly or, in some cases, indirectly (e.g. through a non-U.S. partnership) any of our shares will be subject to adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences, including subjecting the investor to a greater tax liability than might otherwise apply and subjecting the investor to a tax on amounts in advance of when such tax would otherwise be imposed, in which case your investment could be materially adversely affected. In addition, if Maiden Holdings were considered a PFIC, upon the death of any U.S. individual owning our shares, such individual’s heirs or estate would not be entitled to a "step-up" in the basis of the shares which might otherwise be available under U.S. federal income tax laws. We believe that we are not, and we currently do not expect to become, a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes; however, there can be no assurance that we will not be deemed a PFIC by the IRS. There are currently only proposed regulations regarding the application of the PFIC provisions to an insurance 38 company. New regulations or pronouncements interpreting or clarifying these rules may be forthcoming. We cannot predict what impact, if any, such guidance would have on a shareholder that is subject to U.S. federal income taxation. U.S. Persons who hold 10% or more of Maiden Holdings’ shares directly or through foreign entities may be subject to taxation under the U.S. CFC rules. Each 10% U.S. shareholder of a foreign corporation that is a CFC at any time during a taxable year that owns shares in the foreign corporation directly or indirectly through foreign entities on the last day of the foreign corporation's taxable year during which it is a CFC must include in its gross income for U.S. federal income tax purposes its pro rata share of the CFC's "subpart F income," even if the subpart F income is not distributed. In addition, upon a sale of shares of a CFC, certain 10% U.S. shareholders may be subject to U.S. federal income tax on a portion of their gain at ordinary income rates. The Company believes that because of the dispersion of the share ownership in Maiden Holdings, no U.S. Person who owns Maiden Holdings’ shares directly or indirectly through foreign entities should be treated as a 10% U.S. shareholder of Maiden Holdings or of any of its foreign subsidiaries. However, Maiden Holdings’ shares may not be as widely dispersed as we believe due to, for example, the application of certain ownership attribution rules, and no assurance may be given that a U.S. Person who owns our shares will not be characterized as a 10% U.S. shareholder, in which case such U.S. Person may be subject to taxation under U.S. CFC rules. Recently enacted U.S. tax reform legislation, as well as possible future tax legislation and regulations, could materially adversely affect an investment in our shares. The 2017 Act amends a range of U.S. federal tax rules applicable to individuals, businesses and international taxation, with certain provisions intended to eliminate certain perceived tax advantages of companies (including insurance companies) that have legal domiciles outside the United States but have certain U.S. connections and U.S. persons investing in such companies. For example, the 2017 Act includes a BEAT that could make affiliate reinsurance between U.S. and non-U.S. members of our group economically unfeasible. In addition, the 21% corporate income tax rate could lead to higher after-tax income for most U.S. insurance companies in the long term that could result in increased competition for our products and services. The 2017 Act may also increase the likelihood that we or our non-U.S. subsidiaries will be deemed to be CFCs for U.S. federal tax purposes. Specifically, the 2017 Act expands the definition of "10% U.S. shareholder" for CFC purposes to include U.S. persons who own 10% or more of the value of a foreign corporation’s shares, rather than only looking to voting power held. As a result, the "voting cut-back" provisions included in our Amended and Restated Bye-laws that limit the voting power of any shareholder to 9.5% of the total voting power of our capital stock will be ineffective in avoiding "10% U.S. shareholder" status for U.S. persons who own 10% or more of the value of our shares. The 2017 Act also expands certain attribution rules for stock ownership in a way that would cause foreign subsidiaries in a foreign parented group that includes at least one U.S. subsidiary to be treated as CFCs. In the event a corporation is characterized as a CFC, any "10% U.S. shareholder" of the CFC is required to include its pro rata share of certain insurance and related investment income in income for a taxable year, even if such income is not distributed. In addition, U.S. tax exempt entities subject to the unrelated business taxable income ("UBTI") rules that own 10% or more of the value of our non-U.S. subsidiaries that are characterized as CFCs may recognize UBTI with respect to such investment. In addition to changes in the CFC rules, the 2017 Act contains modifications to certain provisions relating to PFIC status that could, for example, discourage U.S. persons from investing in our company. The 2017 Act makes it more difficult for a non-U.S. insurance company to avoid PFIC status under an exception for certain non-U.S. insurance companies engaged in the active conduct of an insurance business. The 2017 Act limits this exception to a non-U.S. insurance company that would be taxable as an insurance company if it were a U.S. corporation and that maintains insurance liabilities of more than 25% of such company’s assets for a taxable year (or maintains reserves that at least equal 10% of its assets and it satisfies a facts and circumstances test that requires a showing that the failure to exceed the 25% threshold is due to run-off or rating agency circumstances). While we believe that we should satisfy this reserve test for the foreseeable future, we cannot assure you that this will continue to be the case in future years. The IRS has been considering other changes to the PFIC rules for several years. In 2015, the IRS issued proposed regulations intended to clarify the application of this insurance company exception to the classification of a non-U.S. insurer as a PFIC. These proposed regulations provide that a non-U.S. insurer will qualify for the insurance company exception only if, among other things, the non-U.S. insurer’s officers and employees perform its substantial managerial and operational activities. This proposed regulation will not be effective until adopted in final form. Although we are currently unable to predict the ultimate impact of the 2017 Act on our business, shareholders and results of operations, it is possible that the 2017 Act may increase the U.S. federal income tax liability of U.S. members of our group that cede risk to non-U.S. group members and may affect the timing and amount of U.S. federal income taxes imposed on certain U.S. shareholders. Further, it is possible that other legislation could be introduced and enacted by the current Congress or future Congresses that could have an adverse impact on us. In addition, U.S. federal income tax laws and interpretations regarding whether a company is engaged in a trade or business within the U.S. is a PFIC, or whether U.S. Persons would be required to include in their gross income the "subpart F income" of a CFC or RPII are subject to change, possibly on a retroactive basis. There currently are only recently proposed regulations regarding the application of the PFIC rules to insurance companies, and the regulations regarding RPII have been in proposed form since 1991. New regulations or pronouncements interpreting or clarifying such rules may be forthcoming. The Company cannot be certain if, when, or in what form such regulations or pronouncements may be implemented or made, or whether such guidance will have a retroactive effect. Further, it is possible that other legislation could be introduced and enacted in the future that would have an adverse impact on us. We may be subject to U.K. taxes, which would have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations and on an investment in our shares. A company which is resident in the U.K. for U.K. corporation tax purposes is subject to U.K. corporation tax in respect of its worldwide income and gains. While Maiden Global is a U.K. company, neither Maiden Holdings nor Maiden Bermuda are incorporated in the U.K. Nevertheless, Maiden Holdings or Maiden Bermuda would be treated as being resident in the U.K. for 39 U.K. corporation tax purposes if its central management and control were exercised in the U.K. The concept of central management and control is indicative of the highest level of control of a company’s affairs, which is wholly a question of fact. The directors and officers of both Maiden Holdings and Maiden Bermuda intend to manage their affairs so that both companies are resident in Bermuda, and not resident in the U.K., for U.K. tax purposes. However, HM Revenue & Customs could challenge our tax residence status. A company which is not resident in the U.K. for U.K. corporation tax purposes can nevertheless be subject to U.K. corporation tax at the rate of 19% if it carries on a trade in the U.K. through a permanent establishment in the U.K., but the charge to U.K. corporation tax is limited to profits (both income profits and chargeable gains) attributable directly or indirectly to such permanent establishment. The directors and officers of Maiden Bermuda intend to operate the business of Maiden Bermuda in such a manner that it does not carry on a trade in the U.K. through a permanent establishment in the U.K. Nevertheless, HM Revenue & Customs might contend successfully that Maiden Bermuda is trading in the U.K. through a permanent establishment in the U.K. because there is considerable uncertainty as to the activities which constitute carrying on a trade in the U.K. through a permanent establishment in the U.K. The U.K. has no income tax treaty with Bermuda. Companies that are neither resident in the U.K. nor entitled to the protection afforded by a double tax treaty between the U.K. and the jurisdiction in which they are resident are liable to income tax in the U.K., at the basic rate of 20%, on the profits of a trade carried on in the U.K., where that trade is not carried on through a permanent establishment in the U.K. The directors and officers of Maiden Bermuda intend to operate the business in such a manner that Maiden Bermuda will not fall within the charge to income tax in the U.K. (other than by way of deduction or withholding). In addition, diverted profits tax ("DPT") applies to foreign companies with sales in the U.K. (such as Maiden Bermuda) that design their affairs to avoid creating a taxable presence (in the form of a permanent establishment) in the U.K., or to U.K. companies that enter into transactions with connected companies which lack economic substance to exploit differentials in tax rates. DPT is charged at 25% of the profits representing the contribution of the U.K. activities to the group’s results. If either Maiden Holdings or Maiden Bermuda were treated as being resident in the U.K. for U.K. corporation tax purposes, or if Maiden Bermuda were treated as carrying on a trade in the U.K., whether through a permanent establishment or otherwise, or if DPT applied, the results of our operations would be materially adversely affected. Any arrangements (including with regard to the provision of services or financing) between Maiden Global and any non-U.K. resident members of the group are subject to the U.K. transfer pricing regime. Consequently, if any such arrangement were found not to be on arm’s length terms and, as a result, a U.K. tax advantage was being obtained, an adjustment would be required to compute U.K. tax profits as if such arrangement were on arm’s length terms. Any transfer pricing adjustment could adversely impact the tax charge suffered by Maiden Global. The U.K. has implemented the BEPS recommendation for "country-by-country" reporting. As a result, our approach to transfer pricing may become subject to greater scrutiny from the U.K. tax authorities. Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments. None. Item 2. Properties. We currently lease office space in Pembroke, Bermuda (our corporate headquarters), the U.S., the U.K., Germany, Austria, Ireland, Australia, Netherlands and Russia for the operation of our business. We also lease a property for employee use in Bermuda. We renew and enter into new leases in the ordinary course of business as needed. Whilst we believe that the office space from these leased properties is sufficient for us to conduct our operations for the foreseeable future, we may need to expand into additional facilities to accommodate future growth. To date, the cost of acquiring and maintaining our office space has not been material to us as a whole. 40 Item 3. Legal Proceedings. We may become involved in various claims and legal proceedings that arise in the normal course of our business, which are not likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity. Except as noted below, the Company is not a party to any material legal proceedings. From time to time, the Company is subject to routine legal proceedings, including arbitrations, arising in the ordinary course of business. These legal proceedings generally relate to claims asserted by or against the Company in the ordinary course of insurance or reinsurance operations. Based on the Company's opinion, the eventual outcome of these legal proceedings is not expected to have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations. In April 2009, the Company learned that Bentzion S. Turin, the former Chief Operating Officer, General Counsel and Secretary of Maiden Holdings and Maiden Bermuda, sent a letter to the U.S. Department of Labor claiming that his employment with the Company was terminated in retaliation for corporate whistleblowing in violation of the whistleblower protection provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Mr. Turin alleged that he was terminated for raising concerns regarding corporate governance with respect to the negotiation of the terms of the Trust Preferred Securities Offering. He seeks reinstatement as Chief Operating Officer, General Counsel and Secretary of Maiden Holdings and Maiden Bermuda, back pay and legal fees incurred. On December 31, 2009, the U.S. Secretary of Labor found no reasonable cause for Mr. Turin’s claim and dismissed the complaint in its entirety. Mr. Turin objected to the Secretary's findings and requested a hearing before an administrative law judge in the U.S. Department of Labor. The Company moved to dismiss Mr. Turin's complaint, and its motion was granted by the Administrative Law Judge on June 30, 2011. On July 13, 2011, Mr. Turin filed a petition for review of the Administrative Law Judge's decision with the Administrative Review Board in the U.S. Department of Labor. On March 29, 2013, the Administrative Review Board reversed the dismissal of the complaint on procedural grounds, and remanded the case to the administrative law judge. The administrative hearing began in September 2014 and we expect the hearings to conclude in 2018. The Company believes that it had good and sufficient reasons for terminating Mr. Turin's employment and that the claim is without merit. The Company will continue to vigorously defend itself against this claim. Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures. Not applicable. 41 PART II Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. Our common shares began publicly trading on NASDAQ under the symbol "MHLD" on May 6, 2008. The following table sets out the high and low prices for our common shares for the periods indicated as reported by NASDAQ. Such prices reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and do not necessarily represent actual transactions. 2017 First quarter Second quarter Third quarter Fourth quarter 2016 First quarter Second quarter Third quarter Fourth quarter High Low $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 18.95 14.25 11.65 8.95 14.90 13.69 14.49 18.10 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 13.25 10.25 6.25 5.55 11.14 11.64 11.75 12.37 At February 20, 2018, the last reported sale price of our common share was $7.40 per share and there were 25 holders of record of our common shares. This figure does not represent the actual number of beneficial owners of our common shares because shares are frequently held in "street name" by securities dealers and others for the benefit of beneficial owners who may vote the shares. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, we declared regular quarterly dividends totaling $0.60 and $0.57 per common share, respectively. The continued declaration and payment of dividends to holders of common shares is expected but will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and subject to specified legal, regulatory, financial and other restrictions. See "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 15. Statutory Requirements and Dividend Restrictions" included under Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this Form 10-K for discussion regarding dividend restrictions on subsidiary's ability to transfer funds to Maiden Holdings. On February 21, 2017, the Company's Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to $100.0 million of the Company's common shares from time to time at market prices. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company repurchased a total of 3,667,134 common shares (2016 - 0) at an average price of $6.84 per share under its share repurchase authorization. At December 31, 2017, the Company has a remaining authorization of $74.9 million for share repurchases.In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company repurchased a total of 38,122 (2016 - 35,258) shares at an average price per share of $15.06 (2016 - $13.33) from employees, which represent withholdings in respect of tax obligations on the vesting of restricted shares and performance based shares. The table below details the repurchases that were made during the three months ended December 31, 2017, under the share repurchase authorization: Period Total number of shares repurchased Average price paid per share November 1, 2017 - November 30, 2017 December 1, 2017 - December 31, 2017 Total 1,380,248 271,186 1,651,434 $ $ $ 6.49 6.56 6.50 Total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs Dollar amount still available under trading plan ($ in thousands) $ 1,380,248 271,186 1,651,434 $ 85,662 76,703 74,924 74,924 Subsequent to December 31, 2017 and through the period ended February 20, 2018, the Company repurchased a total of 1,770 shares at an average price per share of $7.35 from employees, which represent withholdings in respect of tax obligations on the vesting of restricted shares. See "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 13. Shareholders' Equity" included under Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this Form 10-K. Also, see "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 14. Share Compensation and Pension Plans" included under Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this Form 10-K for a discussion about the Company's equity compensation plans. As a holding company, our principal source of income is dividends or other statutorily permissible payments from our subsidiaries. The ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends is limited by the applicable laws and regulations of the various countries in which we operate, including Bermuda and the U.S. See Item 1 "Business — Regulatory Matters", Item 7 "Management’s 42 Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition", and "Results of Operations, Liquidity and Capital Resources — Restrictions, Collateral and Specific Requirements", included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Performance Graph The following information is not deemed to be "soliciting material" or to be "filed" with the SEC or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, and the report shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any prior or subsequent filing by the Company under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act. The following graph shows the cumulative total return, including reinvestment of dividends, on the common shares compared to such return for S&P 500 Composite Index ("S&P 500"), and NASDAQ Insurance Index for the five year period beginning December 31, 2012, assuming $100 was invested on that date and ending on December 31, 2017. The measurement point on the graph represents the cumulative shareholder return as measured by the last reported sale price on such date during the relevant period. Total Return To Shareholders (Includes Reinvestment of Dividends) Comparison of Cumulative Total Return 43 Item 6. Selected Financial Data. The following tables set forth our selected consolidated financial data and other financial information at the end of and for each of the years in the five-year period ended December 31, 2017. Statement of income data and balance sheet data are derived from our audited Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These historical results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected from any future period. For further discussion of this risk, see Item 1A. "Risk Factors" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. You should read the following selected financial data in conjunction with the other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10- K, including Item 7 "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data". For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 ($ in thousands, except per share amounts and ratios) Summary Consolidated Statement of Income Data: Gross premiums written Net premiums written Net premiums earned Other insurance revenue Net investment income Net realized gains on investment Net impairment losses recognized in earnings $ $ $ 2,816,051 2,761,988 2,732,779 $ $ $ 2,831,348 2,654,952 2,568,150 $ $ $ 2,662,825 2,514,116 2,429,069 $ $ $ 2,507,352 2,458,136 2,251,743 $ $ $ 2,204,159 2,096,301 2,000,887 9,802 166,345 12,222 — 10,817 145,892 6,774 — 11,512 131,092 2,498 (1,060) 13,410 117,215 1,163 (2,364) 14,232 91,352 3,585 — Total revenues 2,921,148 2,731,633 2,573,111 2,381,167 2,110,056 Net loss and loss adjustment expenses 2,160,011 1,819,906 1,633,570 1,498,271 1,349,630 Commissions and other acquisition expenses 820,758 773,664 724,197 659,315 556,578 General and administrative expenses Interest and amortization expenses Accelerated amortization of debt discount and senior note issuance cost Amortization of intangible assets Foreign exchange losses (gains) Income tax (benefit) expense Income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests 70,560 23,260 2,809 2,132 14,921 (3,558) 151 66,984 28,173 2,345 2,461 (11,612) 1,574 (842) 64,872 29,063 — 2,840 (7,753) 2,038 (192) 62,558 29,959 28,240 3,277 (4,150) 2,164 142 58,353 39,805 — 3,780 (2,809) 1,863 121 Total expenses 3,091,044 2,682,653 2,448,635 2,279,776 2,007,321 Dividends on preference shares (29,156) (33,756) (24,337) (24,337) (14,834) Net (loss) income attributable to Maiden common shareholders Per Common Share Data: (Loss) earnings per common share(1): Basic Diluted(2) Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: Basic Diluted(2) Dividends declared per common share $ (199,052) $ 15,224 $ 100,139 $ 77,054 $ 87,901 $ $ $ (2.32) $ (2.32) $ 0.20 0.19 $ $ 1.36 1.31 $ $ 1.06 1.04 $ $ 1.21 1.18 85,678,232 77,534,860 73,478,544 72,843,782 72,510,361 85,678,232 78,686,943 85,638,235 74,117,568 76,417,839 0.60 $ 0.57 $ 0.53 $ 0.46 $ 0.38 44 For the Year Ended December 31, Selected Consolidated Ratios: Loss and LAE ratio(3) Commission and other acquisition expense ratio(4) General and administrative expense ratio(5) Expense ratio(6) Combined ratio(7) December 31, Summary Consolidated Balance Sheet Data: Total investments Cash and cash equivalents Restricted cash and cash equivalents Reinsurance balances receivable, net Loan to related party Deferred commission and other acquisition expenses Total assets Reserve for loss and LAE Unearned premiums Senior notes, net 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 78.8% 29.9% 2.6% 32.5% 70.6% 30.0% 2.6% 32.6% 111.3% 103.2% 66.9% 29.7% 2.7% 32.4% 99.3% 66.1% 29.1% 2.8% 31.9% 98.0% 67.0% 27.6% 2.9% 30.5% 97.5% 2017 2016 2014 2015 ($ in thousands, except per share amounts) 2013 $ 5,148,771 $ 4,736,938 $ 4,127,743 $ 3,469,475 $ 3,167,159 67,919 123,584 345,043 167,975 439,597 6,644,189 3,547,248 1,477,038 254,482 45,747 103,788 410,166 167,975 424,605 89,641 242,859 377,318 167,975 397,548 108,119 284,381 512,996 167,975 372,487 139,833 77,360 560,145 167,975 304,908 6,252,299 5,703,578 5,153,650 4,700,434 2,896,496 2,510,101 2,271,292 1,957,835 1,475,506 1,354,572 1,207,757 1,034,754 351,409 349,933 349,558 349,182 Total Maiden shareholders’ equity 1,232,174 1,360,797 1,347,821 1,240,694 1,123,843 Book Value: Book value per common share(8) Accumulated dividends per common share Book value per common share plus accumulated dividends Change in book value per common share plus accumulated dividends Diluted book value per common share(9) $ $ $ 9.25 3.92 13.17 $ $ 12.12 $ 11.77 3.32 2.75 15.44 $ 14.52 $ $ 12.69 $ 11.14 2.22 1.76 14.91 $ 12.90 (14.7)% 6.3% (2.6)% 15.6% (3.3)% 9.18 $ 12.00 $ 11.61 $ 12.47 $ 10.92 (1) Please refer to "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 12. Earnings per Common Share" included under Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this Form 10-K for the calculation of basic and diluted (loss) earnings per common share. (2) During a period of loss, the basic weighted average common shares outstanding is used in the denominator of the diluted loss per common share computation as the effect of including potential dilutive shares would be anti-dilutive. (3) Calculated by dividing net loss and LAE by the sum of net premiums earned and other insurance revenue. (4) Calculated by dividing commission and other acquisition expenses by the sum of net premiums earned and other insurance revenue. (5) Calculated by dividing general and administrative expenses by the sum of net premiums earned and other insurance revenue. (6) Calculated by adding together the commission and other acquisition expense ratio and the general and administrative expense ratio. (7) Calculated by adding together the net loss and LAE ratio and the expense ratio. (8) Book value per common share is defined as total shareholders’ equity available to common shareholders divided by the number of common shares issued and outstanding at the end of the period, giving no effect to dilutive securities. (9) Diluted book value per common share is calculated by dividing common shareholders' equity, adjusted for assumed proceeds from the exercise of dilutive options, by the number of outstanding common shares plus dilutive options and restricted share units (assuming exercise of all dilutive share based awards). The Mandatory Convertible Preference Shares - Series B, which were converted into common shares on September 15, 2016, are excluded at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 as they are anti-dilutive. 45 Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. The following discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and Item 1, "Business - General Overview" on page 2. Amounts in tables may not reconcile due to rounding differences. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in this Report, including information with respect to the Company’s plans and strategy for its business, includes forward-looking statements that involve risk and uncertainties. Please see the "Special Note About Forward-Looking Statements" in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information on factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by any forward-looking statements contained in this discussion and analysis. You should review the "Risk Factors" set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained herein. Overview We are a Bermuda-based holding company formed in June 2007 primarily focused on serving the needs of regional and specialty insurers in the U.S. and Europe by providing innovative reinsurance solutions designed to support their capital needs. We specialize in reinsurance solutions that optimize financing by providing coverage within the more predictable and actuarially credible lower layers of coverage and/or reinsuring risks that are believed to be lower hazard, more predictable and generally not susceptible to significant claims from natural catastrophes. Our tailored solutions include a variety of value added services focused on helping our clients grow and prosper. We have operations in Bermuda and the U.S. which provide reinsurance through our wholly owned subsidiaries, Maiden Bermuda and Maiden US. Maiden Bermuda and Maiden US do not underwrite any primary insurance business. Maiden LF is a life insurer organized in Sweden and writes credit life insurance on a primary basis in support of Maiden Global business development efforts. Our business consists of two reportable segments: Diversified Reinsurance and AmTrust Reinsurance. Please refer to Item 1, "Business - Our Reportable Segments" section for a discussion on our reportable segments. Recent Developments The following are strategic and capital transactions that occurred during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. Redemption of 2012 Senior Notes On June 27, 2017, Maiden Holdings fully redeemed all of the Maiden NA's 8.0% 2012 Senior Notes due 2042, using a portion of the proceeds from the Preference Shares - Series D issuance, thus lowering our cost of capital. The 2012 Senior Notes were redeemed at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of $100.0 million plus accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount being redeemed up to, but not including, the redemption date. As a result, the Company accelerated the amortization of the remaining 2012 Senior Note issuance cost of $2.8 million. Issuance of Preference Shares - Series D On June 15, 2017, Maiden Holdings issued 6,000,000 shares of 6.7% Preference Shares - Series D ("Preference Shares - Series D"), par value $0.01, at a price of $25 per preference share. We received net proceeds of $144.9 million from the offering after deducting issuance costs of $5.1 million, which were recognized as a reduction in additional paid-in capital. Each share, which is redeemable at our sole option beginning June 15, 2022, will be paid non-cumulative dividends at a rate of 6.7% per annum on the initial liquidation preference of $25 per share. The Preference Shares - Series D have no voting rights other than to elect two additional members of the board of directors if dividends on the Preference Shares - Series D have not been declared and paid for the equivalent of six or more dividend periods. The Preference Shares - Series D have been listed on NYSE and trading commenced on June 15, 2017 under the symbol "MHPRD". Conversion of Mandatory Convertible Preference Shares - Series B On September 15, 2016, the Parent Company's $165.0 million mandatory convertible Preference Shares - Series B were automatically converted into 12,069,090 of the Parent Company's common shares at a conversion rate of 3.6573 per preference share. Issuance of 2016 Senior Notes and Redemption of 2011 Senior Notes On June 14, 2016, Maiden Holdings issued $110.0 million 6.625% Senior Notes and used the cash proceeds to fully redeem all of Maiden NA's 8.25% 2011 Senior Notes due 2041 on June 15, 2016, thus lowering our cost of capital. 46 2017 Financial Highlights For the Year Ended December 31, Summary Consolidated Statement of Income Data: Net (loss) income Net (loss) income attributable to Maiden common shareholders Non-GAAP operating (loss) earnings(1) Basic (loss) earnings per common share: Net (loss) income attributable to Maiden common shareholders(2) Non-GAAP operating (loss) earnings attributable to Maiden common shareholders(1) Diluted (loss) earnings per common share: Net (loss) income attributable to Maiden common shareholders(2) (9) Non-GAAP operating (loss) earnings attributable to Maiden common shareholders(1) (9) Dividends per common share Gross premiums written Net premiums earned Underwriting loss(3) Net investment income Combined ratio(4) Non-GAAP operating return on average common shareholders' equity(1) At December 31, Consolidated Financial Condition Total investments and cash and cash equivalents(5) Total assets Reserve for loss and loss adjustment expense ("loss and LAE") Senior notes - principal amount Maiden common shareholders' equity Maiden shareholders' equity Total capital resources(6) Ratio of debt to total capital resources Book value per common share(7) Accumulated dividends per common share Book value per common share plus accumulated dividends Diluted book value per common share(8) 2017 2016 Change ($ in thousands except per share data) $ $ (169,745) (199,052) (184,899) $ 48,138 15,224 17,294 (217,883) (214,276) (202,193) (2.32) (2.16) (2.32) (2.16) 0.60 2,816,051 2,732,779 (277,057) 166,345 0.20 0.22 0.19 0.22 0.57 2,831,348 2,568,150 (53,180) 145,892 111.3 % (20.4)% 103.2% 1.9% (2.52) (2.38) (2.51) (2.38) 0.03 (15,297) 164,629 (223,877) 20,453 8.1 (22.3) 2017 2016 Change $ $ 5,340,274 6,644,189 3,547,248 262,500 767,174 1,232,174 1,494,674 ($ in thousands except per share data) $ 4,886,473 6,252,299 2,896,496 362,500 1,045,797 1,360,797 1,723,297 17.6 % 21.0% $ $ $ 9.25 3.92 13.17 9.18 $ $ $ 12.12 3.32 15.44 12.00 $ $ $ 453,801 391,890 650,752 (100,000) (278,623) (128,623) (228,623) (3.4) (2.87) 0.60 (2.27) (2.82) (1) Non-GAAP operating (loss) earnings, non-GAAP operating (loss) earnings per common share, non-GAAP operating return on average common equity and underwriting loss are non-GAAP financial measures. See "Key Financial Measures" for additional information and a reconciliation to the nearest U.S. GAAP financial measure (net (loss) income). (2) Please refer to "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 12. Earnings per Common Share" included under Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this Form 10-K for the calculation of basic and diluted (loss) earnings per common share. (3) Calculated by adding together the net loss and LAE ratio and the expense ratio. (4) Total investments and cash and cash equivalents includes both restricted and unrestricted. (5) The sum of the Company's principal amount of debt and Maiden shareholders' equity. See "Key Financial Measures" for additional information. (6) Book value per common share is calculated using common shareholders’ equity (shareholders' equity excluding the aggregate liquidation value of our preference shares) divided by the number of common shares outstanding. See "Key Financial Measures" for additional information. (7) Diluted book value per common share is calculated by dividing common shareholders' equity, adjusted for assumed proceeds from the exercise of dilutive options, by the number of outstanding common shares plus dilutive options and restricted share units (assuming exercise of all dilutive share based awards). The Mandatory Convertible Preference Shares - Series B, which were converted into common shares on September 15, 2016, are excluded at December 31, 2016. (8) During a period of loss, the basic weighted average common shares outstanding is used in the denominator of the diluted loss per common share computation as the effect of including potential dilutive shares would be anti-dilutive. 47 Key Financial Measures In addition to the Consolidated Balance Sheets and Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income, management uses certain key financial measures, some of which are non-GAAP measures, to evaluate its financial performance and the overall growth in value generated for the Company’s common shareholders. Management believes that these measures, which may be defined differently by other companies, explain the Company’s results in a manner that allows for a more complete understanding of the underlying trends in the Company’s business. The non-GAAP measures should not be viewed as a substitute for those determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These key financial measures are: Non-GAAP operating (loss) earnings and non-GAAP diluted operating (loss) earnings per common share: Management believes that the use of non-GAAP operating (loss) earnings and non-GAAP diluted operating (loss) earnings per share enables investors and other users of the Company’s financial information to analyze its performance in a manner similar to how management analyzes performance. Management also believes that these measures generally follow industry practice and, therefore, allow the users of financial information to compare the Company’s performance with its industry peer group, and that the equity analysts and certain rating agencies which follow the Company, and the insurance industry as a whole, generally exclude these items from their analyses for the same reasons. Non-GAAP operating (loss) earnings should not be viewed as a substitute for U.S. GAAP net (loss) income. Non-GAAP operating (loss) earnings is an internal performance measure used by management as these measures focus on the underlying fundamentals of the Company's operations by excluding, on a recurring basis: (1) net realized gains or losses on investment; (2) impairment losses related to investments which were recognized in earnings; (3) foreign exchange gains or losses; (4) amortization of intangible assets; (5) loss and related activity from our run-off operations comprised of our former segment NGHC Quota Share and our divested excess and surplus ("E&S") business; (6) accelerated amortization of senior note issuance costs; and (7) certain non-cash deferred tax (benefit) expenses. We exclude net realized gains or losses on investment, impairment losses related to investments, and foreign exchange gains or losses as we believe these are influenced by market opportunities and other factors. We do not believe amortization of intangible assets, accelerated amortization of senior note issuance costs, and loss and related activity from our run-off operations are representative of our ongoing business. We believe all of these amounts are largely independent of our business and underwriting process and including them distorts the analysis of trends in our operations. Underwriting (loss) income is a non-GAAP measure and is calculated as net premiums earned plus other insurance revenue less net loss and LAE, commission and other acquisition expenses and general and administrative expenses directly related to underwriting activities. Management believes that this measure is important in evaluating the underwriting performance of the Company and its segments. This measure is also a useful tool to measure the profitability of the Company separately from the investment results and is also a widely used performance indicator in the insurance industry. A reconciliation of the Company's underwriting results can be found in the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. Please refer to "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 3. Segment Reporting" included under Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this Form 10-K for further details. 48 Non-GAAP operating (loss) earnings and non-GAAP diluted operating (loss) earnings per common share can be reconciled to the nearest U.S. GAAP financial measure as follows: For the Year Ended December 31, Net (loss) income attributable to Maiden common shareholders Add (subtract): Net realized gains on investment Net impairment losses recognized in earnings Foreign exchange and other losses (gains) Amortization of intangible assets Divested E&S business and NGHC run-off Accelerated amortization of senior note issuance cost Non-cash deferred tax (benefit) expense Non-GAAP operating (loss) earnings attributable to Maiden common shareholders Diluted (loss) earnings per share attributable to Maiden common shareholders Add (subtract): Net realized gains on investment Net impairment losses recognized in earnings Foreign exchange and other losses (gains) Amortization of intangible assets Divested E&S business and NGHC run-off Accelerated amortization of senior note issuance cost Non-cash deferred tax (benefit) expense 2017 2016 2015 ($ in thousands except per share data) $ (199,052) $ 15,224 $ 100,139 $ $ (12,222) — 14,921 2,132 10,443 2,809 (3,930) (6,774) — (11,612) 2,461 14,489 2,345 1,161 (2,498) 1,060 (7,753) 2,840 12,241 — 1,161 (184,899) $ 17,294 $ 107,190 (2.32) $ 0.19 $ 1.31 (0.14) — 0.17 0.03 0.12 0.03 (0.05) (2.16) $ (0.09) — (0.15) 0.03 0.19 0.03 0.02 0.22 $ (0.03) 0.01 (0.09) 0.04 0.14 — 0.01 1.39 Non-GAAP diluted operating (loss) earnings per common share $ Non-GAAP operating (loss) earnings attributable to Maiden common shareholders decreased by $202.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. This decrease was largely due to $321.5 million of adverse prior year loss development as well as higher initial current year loss ratios during the year ended December 31, 2017 in both of our operating segments. More than half of the adverse development was due to a $171.0 million reserve charge implemented in the fourth quarter of 2017. AmTrust Reinsurance segment's Workers' Compensation business represented about 39.4% of the adverse development with the balance primarily from AmTrust Reinsurance segment's General Liability business and two large Commercial Auto accounts in the Diversified Reinsurance segment's US business unit. The decline in underwriting income during the year ended December 31, 2017 was partially offset by the $20.5 million increase in net investment income. Non-GAAP operating (loss) earnings attributable to Maiden common shareholders decreased by $89.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015. This decrease was largely due to $165.3 million of adverse reserve development during 2016, primarily related to our commercial auto line of business. The decline in underwriting results in 2016 was partially offset by the $14.8 million increase in net investment income. Non-GAAP Operating Return on Average Common Equity ("Non-GAAP Operating ROACE"): Management uses non-GAAP operating return on average common shareholders' equity as a measure of profitability that focuses on the return to common shareholders. It is calculated using non-GAAP operating (loss) earnings available to common shareholders (as defined above) divided by average common shareholders' equity. Management has set, as a target, a long-term average of 15% non-GAAP Operating ROACE, which management believes provides an attractive return to shareholders for the risk assumed from our business. Non-GAAP Operating ROACE for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was computed as follows: For the Year Ended December 31, and at December 31, 2017 2016 2015 Non-GAAP operating (loss) earnings attributable to Maiden common shareholders Opening Maiden common shareholders’ equity Ending Maiden common shareholders’ equity Average Maiden common shareholders’ equity(1) Non-GAAP Operating ROACE ($ in thousands) $ (184,899) $ 1,045,797 $ $ 767,174 906,486 $ $ 17,294 867,821 $ 1,045,797 $ 922,999 $ $ $ $ 107,190 925,694 867,821 896,758 (20.4)% 1.9% 12.0% 49 (1) Average common shareholders' equity for the year ended December 31, 2016 is adjusted for the period the Mandatory Convertible Preference Shares - Series B are outstanding (prior to mandatory conversion date of September 15, 2016). Book Value per Common Share and Diluted Book Value per Common Share: Management uses growth in both of these metrics as a prime measure of the value we are generating for our common shareholders, as management believes that growth in each metric ultimately results in growth in the Company’s common share price. These metrics are impacted by the Company’s net (loss) income and external factors, such as interest rates, which can drive changes in unrealized gains or losses on our investment portfolio and share repurchases which amounted to $25.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2017. At December 31, 2017, book value per common share decreased by 23.7% and diluted book value per common share decreased by 23.5%, compared to December 31, 2016, (see "Liquidity and Capital Resources - Investments" on page 73 for further information). Book value and diluted book value per common share at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 were computed as follows: December 31, Ending Maiden common shareholders’ equity Proceeds from assumed conversion of dilutive options Numerator for diluted book value per common share calculation Common shares outstanding Shares issued from assumed conversion of dilutive options and restricted share units Denominator for diluted book value per common share calculation Book value per common share Diluted book value per common share 2017 2016 2015 ($ in thousands except share and per share data) 767,174 $ 1,045,797 $ 867,821 9,416 13,383 13,362 776,590 $ 1,059,180 $ 881,183 82,974,895 86,271,109 73,721,140 1,627,236 1,961,457 2,166,545 84,602,131 88,232,566 75,887,685 9.25 9.18 $ $ 12.12 12.00 $ $ 11.77 11.61 $ $ $ $ Ratio of Debt to Total Capital Resources: Management uses this non-GAAP measure to monitor the financial leverage of the Company. This measure is calculated using total principal amount of debt divided by the sum of total capital resources. On June 27, 2017, we fully redeemed all of the 2012 Senior Notes using a portion of the proceeds from the Preference Shares - Series D issuance (see related discussions in "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 7. Long-Term Debt and Note 13. Shareholders' Equity") included under Item 8 "Financial Statement and Supplementary Data". The ratio of Debt to Total Capital Resources at December 31, 2017 and 2016 was computed as follows: December 31, Senior notes - principal amount Maiden shareholders’ equity Total capital resources Ratio of debt to total capital resources 2017 2016 ($ in thousands) $ 262,500 $ 362,500 1,232,174 1,360,797 $ 1,494,674 $ 1,723,297 17.6% 21.0% Underwriting (loss) income and Combined ratio: Management uses this non-GAAP measure as the combined ratio is commonly used in the insurance and reinsurance industry as a measure of underwriting profitability. Management measures underwriting results on an overall basis and for each segment on the basis of the combined ratio. The combined ratio is the sum of the net loss and LAE ratio and the expense ratio and the computations of each component are described below. A combined ratio under 100% indicates underwriting profitability, as the net loss and LAE, commission and other acquisition expenses and general and administrative expenses are less than the net premiums earned and other insurance revenue on that business. In 2017, an underwriting loss was caused by adverse development of prior year losses of $321.5 million primarily in the AmTrust Reinsurance segment which had adverse development of $239.9 million. However, adverse prior year development was also experienced in our Diversified Reinsurance segment which had adverse development of $71.4 million and our Other category which had adverse development of $10.2 million. Current year underwriting results have also been impacted by increases in our initial loss picks for new premium earned in both the Diversified Reinsurance and AmTrust Reinsurance segments factoring in both market conditions and recent loss trends and experience. In 2016, an underwriting loss was caused by adverse reserve development of $165.3 million, primarily due to unfavorable commercial auto reserve development in both segments. Prior to 2016, we have generated underwriting income in each year since inception. Underwriting income is calculated by subtracting net loss and LAE, commissions and other acquisition expenses and applicable general and administrative expenses from the net premiums earned and other insurance revenue and is the monetized counterpart of the combined ratio. For purposes of these non-GAAP operating measures, the fee-generating business which is included in our Diversified Reinsurance segment, is considered part of the underwriting operations of the Company.While an important metric of 50 success, underwriting (loss) income and combined ratio do not reflect all components of profitability, as they do not recognize the impact of investment income earned on premiums between the time premiums are received and the time loss payments are ultimately paid to clients. Because we do not manage our cash and investments by segment, investment income and interest expense are not allocated to individual reportable segments. Certain general and administrative expenses are allocated to segments based on actual costs incurred and estimated time spent by underwriting employees. The "net loss and LAE ratio" is derived by dividing net loss and LAE by the sum of net premiums earned and other insurance revenue. The "commission and other acquisition expense ratio" is derived by dividing commission and other acquisition expenses by the sum of net premiums earned and other insurance revenue. The "general and administrative expense ratio" is derived by dividing general and administrative expenses by the sum of net premiums earned and other insurance revenue. The "expense ratio" is the sum of the commission and other acquisition expense ratio and the general and administrative expense ratio. 51 Relevant Factors Revenues We derive our revenues primarily from premiums on reinsurance contracts, net of any reinsurance or retrocessional coverage purchased and to a minor extent from premiums from insurance policies. Reinsurance premiums are a function of the amount and types of policies and contracts we write, as well as prevailing market prices. Our prices are determined before our ultimate costs, which may extend far into the future, are known. The Company's revenues also include fee income as well as income generated from our investment portfolio. The Company's investment portfolio is comprised of fixed maturity investments, currently held as AFS and HTM, and other investments. In accordance with U.S. GAAP, these investments, except for HTM fixed maturities, are carried at fair market value and unrealized gains and losses are excluded from earnings. These unrealized gains and losses are included on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet in accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI") as a separate component of shareholders' equity. If unrealized losses are considered to be other-than-temporarily impaired due to a credit event, such losses are included in earnings as a realized loss. Expenses Our expenses consist largely of net loss and LAE, commission and other acquisition expenses, general and administrative expenses, interest and amortization expenses, amortization of intangible assets and foreign exchange and other gains or losses. Net loss and LAE has three main components: • losses paid, which are actual cash payments to insureds, net of recoveries from reinsurers; • change in outstanding loss or case reserves, which represent cedants' best estimate of the likely settlement amount for known claims, less the portion that can be recovered from reinsurers; and • change in IBNR reserves, which we establish to respond to changes in the values of claims that have been reported to us but are not yet settled, as well as claims that have occurred but have not yet been reported to us. The portion recoverable from reinsurers is deducted from the gross estimated loss. Commission and other acquisition expenses include commissions, brokerage fees and insurance taxes. Commissions and brokerage fees are usually calculated as a percentage of premiums and depend on the market and line of business and can, in certain instances, vary based on loss sensitive features of reinsurance contracts. Commission and other acquisition expenses are reported after: (1) deducting commissions received on ceded reinsurance; (2) deducting the part of commission and other acquisition expenses relating to unearned premiums; and (3) including the amortization of previously deferred commission and other acquisition expenses. General and administrative expenses include personnel expenses (including share-based compensation expense), rent expense, professional fees, information technology costs and other general operating expenses. 52 Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates It is important to understand our accounting policies in order to understand our financial position and results of operations. The Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The following presents a discussion of those accounting policies and estimates that management believes are the most critical to its operations and require the most difficult, subjective and complex judgment. If actual events differ significantly from the underlying assumptions and estimates used by management, there could be material adjustments to prior estimates that could potentially adversely affect the Company’s results of operations, financial condition and liquidity. These critical accounting policies and estimates should be read in conjunction with "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies" included under Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this Form 10-K for a full understanding of the Company’s accounting policies. Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses General: The amount of time that elapses before a claim is reported to the cedant and then subsequently reported to the reinsurer is commonly referred to in the industry as the reporting tail. Lines of business for which claims are reported quickly are commonly referred to as short-tailed lines; and lines of business for which a longer period of time elapses before claims are reported to the reinsurer are commonly referred to as long-tailed lines. In general, for reinsurance, the time lags are longer than for primary business due to the delay that occurs between the cedant becoming aware of a loss and reporting the information to its reinsurer(s). The delay varies by reinsurance market (country of cedant), type of treaty, whether losses are paid by the cedant and the size of the loss. The delay could vary from a few weeks to a year or sometimes longer. Because a significant amount of time can elapse, particularly on longer-tail lines of business written on an excess of loss basis, between the assumption of risk, the occurrence of a loss event, the reporting of the event to an insurance company (the primary company or the cedant), the subsequent reporting to the reinsurance company ("the reinsurer") and the ultimate payment of the claim on the loss event by the reinsurer, the Company’s liability for unpaid loss and LAE ("loss reserves") is based largely upon estimates. The Company categorizes loss reserves into two types of reserves: reported outstanding loss reserves ("case reserves") and IBNR reserves. Case reserves represent, for each individual claim, an estimate of unpaid losses, either by the Company’s cedants or the Company’s claims handling professionals, and recorded by the Company. IBNR reserves represent a provision for claims that have been incurred but not yet reported to the Company, as well as future loss development on losses already reported, in excess of the case reserves. The Company updates its estimates for each of the aforementioned categories on a quarterly basis using information received from its cedants. For excess of loss treaties, cedants generally are required to report losses that either (i) exceed 50% of their retention; or (ii) have a reasonable probability of exceeding the retention; or (iii) meet defined reporting criteria. All reinsurance claims that are reserved are reviewed at least every six months. In addition, reserves for loss and LAE are reviewed every quarter for each cedant. For proportional treaties, cedants are required to give a periodic statement of account, generally monthly or quarterly. These periodic statements typically include information regarding written premiums, earned premiums, unearned premiums, ceding commissions, brokerage amounts, applicable taxes, paid losses and outstanding losses. They can be submitted up to 90 days after the close of the reporting period. Some proportional treaties have specific language requiring earlier notice of serious claims. For all lines, the Company’s objective is to estimate ultimate loss and LAE. Total loss reserves are then calculated by subtracting losses paid. Similarly, IBNR reserves are calculated by subtracting case reserves from total loss reserves. IBNR is the estimated liability for (1) changes in the values of claims that have been reported to us but are not yet settled, as well as (2) claims that have occurred but have not yet been reported as well as (3) claims that are closed but subsequently reopened. Each claim is settled individually based upon its merits, and particularly for longer-tailed lines of business, it is not unusual for a claim to take years after being reported to settle, especially if legal action is involved. As a result, the reserve for loss and LAE include significant estimates for IBNR reserves. The reserve for IBNR is estimated by management for each account based on various factors, including our underwriting team's expectations about loss experience, actuarial analysis and loss experience to date. Our actuaries employ standard actuarial methodologies to determine estimated ultimate loss reserves. In selecting management's best estimate of loss and LAE reserves, we consider the range of results produced by many actuarial methods and the appropriateness of those estimates. These methodologies are described in "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 9. Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses" included under Item 8 "Financial Statement and Supplementary Data". 53 The reserve for loss and LAE at December 31, 2017 and 2016 was as follows: December 31, Reserve for reported loss and LAE Reserve for losses incurred but not reported Reserve for loss and LAE 2017 2016 ($ in thousands) $ $ 1,925,151 $ 1,617,956 1,622,097 1,278,540 3,547,248 $ 2,896,496 While management believes that our case reserves and IBNR are sufficient to cover losses assumed by us, there can be no assurance that losses will not deviate from our reserves, possibly by material amounts. The analysis of the appropriateness of the reserve for IBNR is reviewed quarterly, with adjustments made as appropriate. To the extent actual reported losses exceed expected losses, the carried estimate of the ultimate losses may be increased (i.e. unfavorable reserve development), and to the extent actual reported losses are less than our expectations, the carried estimate of ultimate losses may be reduced (i.e. favorable reserve development). We record any changes in our loss reserve estimates and the related reinsurance recoverable in the periods in which they are determined. Loss reserves do not represent an exact calculation of liability. Rather, loss reserves are estimates of what we expect the ultimate resolution and administration of claims will cost. These estimates are based on actuarial projections and on our assessment of currently available data, as well as estimates of future trends in claims severity and frequency, judicial theories of liability and other factors. Loss reserve estimates are refined as experience develops and as claims are reported and resolved. In addition, the relatively long periods between when a loss occurs and when it may be reported to our claims department for our casualty reinsurance lines of business also increase the uncertainties of reserve estimates in such lines. With the guidance of the methods described in "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 9. Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses" included under Item 8 "Financial Statement and Supplementary Data", actuarial judgment is applied in the determination of ultimate losses. In general, the Company’s segments have varying levels of seasoning with which the Company has direct experience and as a result, differing methods are utilized to estimate loss and LAE reserves in each segment. In our Diversified Reinsurance segment, the Company’s executive and technical management, including Claims, Underwriting and Actuarial, have significant experience with this book of business, which also has more than 30 years of loss experience associated with it. In general for our Diversified Reinsurance segment, we utilize the Expected Loss Ratio ("ELR") approach at the onset of reserving an account, the Bornhuetter-Ferguson ("BF") method for business with less but maturing loss experience, and as the experience matures the Loss Development ("LD") method. For proportional business the Company relies heavily on the actual contract experience, whereas for excess of loss business there will be more usage of industry and/or Company specific benchmark assumptions. The Company has underwritten the AmTrust Reinsurance segment since July 1, 2007. The majority of the exposure in the underlying book of business has significant seasoning, and allows for a significant amount of credibility in using parameters derived from historical experience to calculate reserve estimates. Some segments of the book are a result of recent acquisitions or newer markets for AmTrust. These segments require a greater level of assumptions and professional judgment in deriving reserve levels, which inherently implies a wider range of reasonable estimates. As a result, we have tended to rely on a weighted approach which primarily employs the LD method for aspects of the segment with ample historical data, while also considering the ELR or BF method for exposure resulting from recent acquisitions, or a relative business with a more limited level of experience. The Frequency- Severity ("FS") method is also considered for segments of the AmTrust book for which claim count information is available. The Company’s actuarial analysis of this book of business is more refined in that it utilizes a combination of quarterly and annual data instead of contract period data in totality. Additional data detailing items such as class of business, state, claim counts, frequency and severity is available in many instances, further enhancing the reserve analysis. Significant Assumptions Employed in the Estimation of Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses: The most significant assumptions used at December 31, 2017 to estimate the reserve for loss and LAE within the Company’s segments are as follows: • the information developed from internal and independent external sources can be used to develop meaningful estimates of the likely future performance of business bound by the Company; • the loss and exposure information provided by ceding companies, insureds and brokers in support of their reinsurance submissions have been used by Maiden's pricing actuaries to derive meaningful estimates of the likely future performance of business bound with respect to each contract and policy; • historic loss development and trend experience may be used to predict future loss development and trends; and • no significant emergence of losses or types of losses that are not represented in the information supplied to the Company by its brokers, ceding companies and insureds will occur. The above four assumptions most significantly influence the Company’s determination of initial expected loss ratios and expected loss reporting patterns that are the key inputs which impact potential variability in the estimate of the reserve for loss and LAE and are applicable to each of the Company’s business segments. These factors are combined with the actuarial judgment exercised by our reserving actuaries, and validated by the external review of our reserving levels. While there can be no assurance that any of the above assumptions will prove to be correct, we believe that this process represents a realistic and appropriate basis for estimating the reserve for loss and LAE. Loss emergence factors and expected loss ratios used in the reserving process are 54 based on a blend of our own experience, cedant experience and industry benchmarks, when appropriate. The benchmarks selected were those that we believe are most similar to our underwriting business. Factors Creating Uncertainty in the Estimation of the Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses: While management does not at this time include an explicit or implicit provision for uncertainty in its reserve for loss and LAE, certain of the Company’s business lines are by their nature subject to additional uncertainties, which are discussed in detail below. In addition, the Company’s reserves are subject to additional factors which add to the uncertainty of estimating reserve for loss and LAE. Time lags in the reporting of losses can also introduce further ambiguity to the process of estimating reserve for loss and LAE. The inherent uncertainty of estimating the Company’s reserve for loss and LAE increases principally due to: • the lag in time between the time claims are reported to the ceding company and the time they are reported through one or more reinsurance broker intermediaries to the Company; • the differing reserving practices among ceding companies; • the diversity of loss development patterns among different types of reinsurance treaties or contracts; and • the Company’s need to rely on its ceding companies for loss information, which also exposes the Company to changes in the reserving philosophy of the ceding company and the adequacy of its underlying case reserves. In order to verify the accuracy and completeness of the information provided to the Company by its ceding company counterparties, the Company’s underwriters, actuaries, accounting and claims personnel perform underwriting and claims reviews, and at times also accounting and financial audits, of the Company’s ceding companies. Any material findings are communicated to the ceding companies and utilized in the establishment or revision of the Company’s case reserves and related IBNR reserve. On occasion, these reviews reveal that the ceding company’s reported loss and LAE do not comport with the terms of the contract with the Company. In such events, the Company strives to resolve the outstanding differences in an amicable fashion. The large majority of such differences are resolved in this manner. In the infrequent instance where an amicable solution is not feasible, the Company’s policy is to vigorously defend its position in litigation or arbitration. At December 31, 2017, the Company was not involved in any material claims litigation or arbitration proceedings. Due to the large volume of potential transactions that must be recorded in the insurance and reinsurance industry, backlogs in the recording of the Company’s business activities can also impair the accuracy of its loss and LAE reserve estimates. At December 31, 2017, there were no significant backlogs related to the processing of policy or contract information in the Company’s segments. The Company assumes in its loss and LAE reserving process that, on average, the time periods between the recording of expected losses and the reporting of actual losses are predictable when measured in the aggregate and over time. The time period over which all losses are expected to be reported to the Company varies significantly by line of business. This period can range from a few quarters for some lines, such as property, to many years for some casualty lines of business. To the extent that actual reported losses are reported more quickly or more slowly than expected, the Company may adjust its estimate of ultimate loss. Potential Volatility in the Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses: In addition to the factors creating uncertainty in the Company’s estimate of loss and LAE, the Company’s estimated reserve for loss and LAE can change over time because of unexpected changes in the external environment. Potential changing external factors include: • changes in the inflation rate for goods and services related to the covered damages; • changes in the general economic environment that could cause unanticipated changes in claim frequency or severity; • changes in the litigation environment regarding the representation of plaintiffs and potential plaintiffs; • changes in the judicial and/or arbitration environment regarding the interpretation of policy and contract provisions relating to the determination of coverage and/or the amount of damages awarded for certain types of claims; • changes in the social environment regarding the general attitude of juries in the determination of liability and damages; • changes in the legislative environment regarding the definition of damages; • new types of injuries caused by new types of injurious activities or exposures; and • changes in ceding company case reserving and reporting patterns. The Company’s estimates of reserve for loss and LAE can also change over time because of changes in internal company operations, such as: alterations in claims handling procedures; growth in new lines of business where exposure and loss development patterns are not well established; or changes in the quality of risk selection or pricing in the underwriting process. Due to the inherent complexity of the assumptions used in establishing the Company’s loss and LAE reserve estimates, final claim settlements made by the Company may vary significantly from the present estimates, particularly when those settlements may not occur until well into the future. The expected pattern of loss emergence and the projected level of profitability, two primary factors in establishing the loss and LAE reserves, are subject to a normal level of variance. The recognition of this variance defines a possible range of reserve estimates, from which the best estimate of the provision for reserves is derived. In addition, the Company’s segments have varying levels of seasoning with which the Company has direct experience and as a result, the reasonably likely variance of our expected loss ratio for each segment varies commensurately with that experience. 55 Based on a range of reasonable reserve estimates, we believe that if our final loss ratio were to vary from the expected loss ratios in each of our operating segments, Diversified Reinsurance and AmTrust Reinsurance, our required reserves after reinsurance recoverable could increase by approximately $89.6 million or 2.6% and $141.7 million or 4.1%, respectively, of our consolidated net loss and LAE reserves, as at December 31, 2017. Premiums and Commissions and Other Acquisition Expenses For pro-rata contracts and excess-of-loss contracts where no deposit or minimum premium is specified in the contract, written premium is recognized based on estimates of ultimate premiums provided by the ceding companies. Initial estimates of written premium are recognized in the period in which the underlying risks are incepted. Subsequent adjustments, based on reports of actual premium by the ceding companies, or revisions in estimates, are recorded in the period in which they are determined. Reinsurance premiums assumed are generally earned on a pro rata basis over the terms of the underlying policies or reinsurance contracts. Contracts and policies written on a "losses occurring" basis cover claims that may occur during the term of the contract or policy, which is typically 12 months. Accordingly, the premium is earned evenly over the term. Contracts which are written on a "risks attaching" basis cover claims from all underlying insurance policies written during the terms of such contracts. Premiums earned on such contracts extend beyond the original term of the reinsurance contract, typically resulting in recognition of premiums earned over a 24-month period. Reinsurance premiums on specialty risk and extended warranty are earned based on the estimated program coverage period. These estimates are based on the expected distribution of coverage periods by contract at inception, because a single contract may contain multiple coverage period options and these estimates are revised based on the actual coverage period selected by the original insured. Unearned premiums represent the portion of premiums written which is applicable to the unexpired term of the contract or policy in force. These premiums can be subject to estimates based upon information received from ceding companies and any subsequent differences arising on such estimates are recorded in the period in which they are determined. The Company provides proportional and non-proportional reinsurance coverage to cedants (insurance companies). Cedant's actual premiums are unknown at the time they enter into reinsurance agreement so treaties are based upon estimates of those premiums at the time the treaties are written and are typically adjusted as premiums are known. Reporting delays are inherent in the reinsurance industry and vary in length by type of treaty. As delays can vary from a few weeks to a year or sometimes longer, the Company produces accounting estimates to report premiums and commission and other acquisition expenses until it receives the cedants’ actual results. Under proportional treaties, which represented 92.8% (2016 - 92.3%, 2015 - 91.0%) of gross premiums written for the year December 31, 2017, the Company shares proportionally in both the premiums and losses of the cedant and pays the cedant a commission to cover the cedant’s acquisition expenses. Under this type of treaty, the Company’s ultimate premiums written and earned and acquisition expenses are not known at the inception of the treaty and must be estimated until the cedant reports its actual results to the Company. Under non-proportional treaties, which represented 7.2% (2016 - 7.7%, 2015 - 9.0%) of gross premiums written for the year December 31, 2017, the Company is typically exposed to loss events in excess of a predetermined dollar amount or loss ratio and receives a deposit or minimum premium, which is subject to adjustment depending on the premium volume written by the cedant. Reported premiums written and earned and commission and other acquisition expenses on proportional treaties are generally based upon reports received from cedants and brokers, supplemented by the Company’s own estimates of premiums written and commission and other acquisition expenses for which ceding company reports have not been received. Premium and acquisition expense estimates are determined at the individual treaty level based upon contract provisions. The determination of estimates requires a review of the Company’s experience with cedants, a thorough understanding of the individual characteristics of each line of business and the ability to project the impact of current economic indicators on the volume of business written and ceded by the Company’s cedants. Estimates for premiums and commission and other acquisition expenses are updated continuously as new information is received from the cedants. Differences between such estimates and actual amounts are recorded in the period in which estimates are changed or the actual amounts are determined. Assessing whether or not a reinsurance contract meets the condition for risk transfer requires judgment. The determination of risk transfer is critical to reporting premiums written and is based, in part, on the use of actuarial and pricing models and assumptions. If we determine that a reinsurance contract does not transfer sufficient risk, we account for the contract as deposit liability rather than a premium written. Acquisition expenses represent the costs of writing business that vary with, and are primarily related to, the production of the business. Acquisition expenses that are related to successful contracts are deferred and recognized as expense over the same period in which the related premiums are earned. Only certain expenses incurred in the successful acquisition of new and renewal insurance contracts are capitalized. Those expenses include incremental direct costs of contract acquisition that result directly from and are essential to the contract transaction and would not have been incurred had the contract transaction not occurred. All other acquisition- related expenses, such as costs incurred for soliciting business, administration, and unsuccessful acquisition or renewal efforts are charged to expense as incurred. Administrative expenses, including rent, depreciation, occupancy, equipment, and all other general overhead expenses are considered indirect and are expensed as incurred. The Company considers anticipated investment income in determining the recoverability of these deferred costs and believes they are fully recoverable. A premium deficiency is recognized if the sum of anticipated losses and loss adjustment expenses, unamortized acquisition expenses and anticipated investment income exceed unearned premium. 56 Fair Value of Financial Instruments Please refer to "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 5. Fair Value of Financial Instruments" included under Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this Form 10-K on page F-27 for a discussion on the fair value methodology and valuation techniques used by the Company to determine the fair value of the financial instruments held at December 31, 2017 and 2016. Other-Than-Temporary Impairment ("OTTI") of Investments Please refer to "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 2. "Significant Accounting Policies" included under Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this Form 10-K on page F-9 for a discussion on the OTTI evaluation performed by the Company. The Company recognized no OTTI through earnings for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recognized OTTI through earnings of $1.1 million. Please refer to "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 4. Investments" included under Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this Form 10-K on page F-22 for further details. 57 Goodwill and Intangible Assets The Company recognizes Goodwill and Intangible Assets in connection with certain acquisitions. Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of acquisitions over the fair value of the net assets acquired and is assigned to the applicable reporting unit(s) on the acquisition date, based upon the expected benefit to be received by the reporting unit. Intangible Assets comprise both finite and indefinite life assets. Finite life intangible assets include customer and producer relationships and trademarks with useful life of 15 years. Insurance company licenses are considered indefinite life intangible assets. Annually, the Company makes an assessment as to whether the value of the Company’s goodwill and intangible assets are impaired. Impairment, which can be either partial or full, is based on a fair value analysis by individual reporting unit. Based upon the Company’s assessment at the reporting unit level, there was no impairment of its goodwill and intangible assets at December 31, 2017. During 2016, the Company wrote off the goodwill relating to the acquisition of a majority interest in Regulatory Capital Limited, which was deemed to be permanently impaired. The Company recognized an impairment loss of $1.8 million as a result. The following table shows the analysis of goodwill and intangible assets: December 31, 2015 Impairment losses Cumulative translation adjustment Amortization December 31, 2016 Amortization December 31, 2017 Intangible Assets - Indefinite Life Intangible Assets - Finite Life Total Goodwill $ 58,936 (1,800) 56 — ($ in thousands) $ 4,527 — — — $ 18,457 — — (2,461) 57,192 $ 4,527 $ 15,996 $ — — (2,132) 57,192 $ 4,527 $ 13,864 $ $ $ $ 81,920 (1,800) 56 (2,461) 77,715 (2,132) 75,583 In making an assessment of the value of its goodwill and intangible assets, the Company uses both market based and non- market based valuations. Assumptions underlying these valuations include an analysis of the Company’s share price relative to both its book value and its net income in addition to forecasts of future cash flows and future profits. Significant changes in the data underlying these assumptions could result in an assessment of impairment of the Company’s goodwill asset. In addition, if the current economic environment and/or the Company’s financial performance were to deteriorate significantly, this could lead to an impairment of goodwill and intangible, the write-off of which would be recorded against net income in the period such deterioration occurred. If a 5% decline in the fair value of the reporting units occurred, this would not result in an impairment of the goodwill asset at December 31, 2017. 58 Results of Operations The following table sets forth our selected Consolidated Statement of Income data for each of the years indicated: For the Year Ended December 31, Gross premiums written Net premiums written Net premiums earned Other insurance revenue Net loss and LAE Commission and other acquisition expenses General and administrative expenses(1) Underwriting (loss) income(2) Other general and administrative expenses(1) Net investment income Net realized gains on investment Net impairment losses recognized in earnings Accelerated amortization of senior note issuance cost Amortization of intangible assets Foreign exchange and other (losses) gains Interest and amortization expenses Income tax benefit (expense) Net (loss) income (Income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests Dividends on preference shares 2017 2016 ($ in thousands) 2015 $ 2,816,051 $ 2,831,348 $ 2,662,825 $ 2,761,988 $ 2,654,952 $ 2,514,116 $ 2,732,779 $ 2,568,150 $ 2,429,069 9,802 10,817 11,512 (2,160,011) (1,819,906) (1,633,570) (820,758) (38,869) (277,057) (31,691) 166,345 12,222 — (2,809) (2,132) (14,921) (23,260) 3,558 (169,745) (151) (29,156) (773,664) (724,197) (38,577) (53,180) (28,407) 145,892 6,774 — (2,345) (2,461) 11,612 (28,173) (1,574) 48,138 842 (38,328) 44,486 (26,544) 131,092 2,498 (1,060) — (2,840) 7,753 (29,063) (2,038) 124,284 192 (33,756) (24,337) Net (loss) income attributable to Maiden common shareholders $ (199,052) $ 15,224 $ 100,139 Ratios Net loss and LAE ratio(3) Commission and other acquisition expense ratio(4) General and administrative expense ratio(5) Expense ratio(6) Combined ratio(7) 78.8% 29.9% 2.6% 32.5% 70.6% 30.0% 2.6% 32.6% 111.3% 103.2% 66.9% 29.7% 2.7% 32.4% 99.3% (1) Underwriting related general and administrative expenses is a non-GAAP measure. Please refer to "General and Administrative Expenses" below for additional information related to these corporate expenses and the reconciliation to those presented in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. (2) Underwriting (loss) income is a non-GAAP measure and is calculated as net premiums earned plus other insurance revenue less net loss and LAE, commission and other acquisition expenses and general and administrative expenses directly related to underwriting activities. Calculated by dividing net loss and LAE by the sum of net premiums earned and other insurance revenue. Calculated by dividing commission and other acquisition expenses by the sum of net premiums earned and other insurance revenue. Calculated by dividing all general and administrative expenses by the sum of net premiums earned and other insurance revenue. Calculated by adding together commission and other acquisition expense ratio and general and administrative expense ratio. Calculated by adding together net loss and LAE ratio and the expense ratio. (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) 59 Net Income Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 Net loss attributable to Maiden common shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $199.1 million compared to net income attributable to Maiden common shareholders of $15.2 million for the same period in 2016. The net decrease for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 was primarily the result of the following: • an underwriting loss of $277.1 million compared to underwriting loss of $53.2 million during the year ended December 31, 2016. The deterioration in the underwriting result was principally due to: Adverse development of prior year losses of $321.5 million in 2017 compared to $165.3 million for the same period in 2016. This development, which is discussed in greater detail in the individual segment discussion and analysis, was primarily in our AmTrust Reinsurance segment, but adverse prior year development was also experienced in our Diversified Reinsurance Segment and Other category (as discussed below); and Current year underwriting results have also been impacted as we have increased our initial loss ratio picks in both our Diversified Reinsurance and AmTrust Reinsurance segments factoring in both market conditions and recent loss trends and experience. • foreign exchange losses of $14.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to foreign exchange gains of $11.6 million for the same period in 2016 due to the strengthening of euro and British pound against the U.S. dollar. The decreases above were offset by the following: • an increase in net investment income of $20.5 million or 14.0% for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. This increase reflects the growth in average invested assets of 8.6% from the same period in 2016 and increase in average yields to 3.1% during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 3.0% during the same period in 2016. Additionally, part of the increase is attributable to the call of certain securities which generated additional amortization income of $7.2 million during the period compared to $2.0 million of calls in the comparative period; and • a decrease in our Other category adverse prior year development of $10.2 million during the period compared to $14.6 million in the comparative period in 2016 due to decline in incurred losses in the run–off of the NGHC Quota Share offset by the increase in incurred losses in our remaining run–off litigated U.S. E&S property claims. Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 Net income attributable to Maiden common shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2016 decreased to $15.2 million from $100.1 million for the same period in 2015. The factors that contributed to this net decrease were as follows: • decrease in underwriting income of $97.7 million as a result of $165.3 million of adverse prior year development primarily in commercial auto liability across the portfolio. In the Diversified Reinsurance segment, commercial auto liability incurred losses were greater than expected in both excess of loss and quota share accounts so $96.8 million of adverse loss development was recorded for the full year. In the AmTrust Reinsurance segment, we recorded $54.0 million of adverse reserve development for the full year, primarily related to higher than expected commercial auto and general liability loss emergence in program business. Finally, we recorded a $14.6 million increase in additional IBNR reserves relating to the run-off of our NGHC contract; and • redemption of the Company's 2011 Senior Notes in the second quarter of 2016 leading to a non-recurring, non-cash charge of $2.3 million, which represented the accelerated amortization of issuance costs associated with the redeemed debt. The decreases above were offset by an increase in investment income of $14.8 million or 11.3%, for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015. This increase reflects the growth in average investable assets of 12.9%. The following is a discussion on the results of our operations for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015: Net Premiums Written Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 Net premiums written increased by $107.0 million, or 4.0%, for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. The table below compares net premiums written by our reportable segments, reconciled to the total consolidated net premiums written, for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016: For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 2016 Change in ($ in thousands) Total % of Total Total % of Total $ % Diversified Reinsurance $ 807,362 29.2 % $ 766,119 28.9% $ AmTrust Reinsurance Total - reportable segments Other Total 1,954,856 2,762,218 (230) 70.8 % 100.0 % — % 1,888,428 2,654,547 405 71.1% 100.0% —% $ 2,761,988 100.0 % $ 2,654,952 100.0% $ 107,036 60 41,243 66,428 107,671 (635) 5.4% 3.5% 4.1% NM 4.0% NM - not meaningful The increase in net premiums written for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 was due to the reduction in the utilization of retrocessional capacity for both segments in 2017 which increased net premiums written by $112.9 million on a consolidated basis. The retention ratio of gross written premiums increased to 98.1% for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 93.8% for the same period in 2016. In addition, gross premiums written decreased by $15.3 million or 0.5%, primarily in our AmTrust Reinsurance segment. Please refer to the analysis below of our Diversified Reinsurance and AmTrust Reinsurance segments for further details. Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 Net premiums written increased by $140.8 million, or 5.6%, for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015. The table below compares net premiums written by our reportable segments, reconciled to the total consolidated net premiums written, for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015: For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 2015 Change in ($ in thousands) Total % of Total Total % of Total $ % Diversified Reinsurance $ 766,119 28.9% $ 734,781 29.2% $ 1,888,428 2,654,547 405 71.1% 100.0% —% 1,779,334 2,514,115 1 70.8% 100.0% —% $ 2,654,952 100.0% $ 2,514,116 100.0% $ 140,836 31,338 109,094 140,432 404 4.3% 6.1% 5.6% NM 5.6% AmTrust Reinsurance Total - reportable segments Other Total NM - not meaningful The $109.1 million increase in net premiums written in our AmTrust Reinsurance segment for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 is due to organic growth as well as acquisitions made by AmTrust, partially offset by the impact of the 2015 partial commutation. The $31.3 million increase in net premiums written in our Diversified Reinsurance segment for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 was mainly due to growth in our Diversified Reinsurance segment's U.S. casualty and accident and health premiums and treaty contracts written in Europe by Maiden Bermuda in 2016. Net Premiums Earned Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 Net premiums earned increased by $164.6 million or 6.4% for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. The table below compares net premiums earned by our reportable segments, reconciled to the total consolidated net premiums earned, for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016: For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 2016 Change in ($ in thousands) Diversified Reinsurance $ AmTrust Reinsurance Total - reportable segments Other Total NM - not meaningful Total 823,365 1,909,644 2,733,009 (230) % of Total 30.1 % $ 69.9 % 100.0 % — % Total 724,124 1,843,621 2,567,745 405 % of Total 28.2% $ 71.8% 100.0% —% $ 99,241 66,023 165,264 (635) $ 2,732,779 100.0 % $ 2,568,150 100.0% $ 164,629 % 13.7% 3.6% 6.4% NM 6.4% Net premiums earned in the AmTrust Reinsurance segment for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 increased by $66.0 million or 3.6% similar to the reasons outlined in the net premiums written section above. Please refer to the analysis of our AmTrust Reinsurance segment on page 68 for further discussion. Net premiums earned in our Diversified Reinsurance segment increased by $99.2 million or 13.7% for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 as a result of overall growth in our Diversified Reinsurance segment's U.S. property and casualty premiums as well as a reduction in the corporate retrocessional program for 2017. These increases were offset by the commutation of a large account during the second quarter of 2017 which had return premium of $8.0 million. Please refer to the analysis of our Diversified Reinsurance segment on page 65 for further discussion. Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 Net premiums earned increased by $139.1 million, or 5.7%, for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015. The table below compares net premiums earned by our reportable segments, reconciled to the total consolidated net premiums earned, for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015: 61 For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 2015 Change in ($ in thousands) Diversified Reinsurance AmTrust Reinsurance Total - reportable segments Other Total NM - not meaningful Total % of Total Total % of Total $ % $ 724,124 28.2% $ 744,875 30.7% $ 1,843,621 2,567,745 405 71.8% 100.0% —% 1,684,191 2,429,066 3 69.3% 100.0% —% (20,751) 159,430 138,679 402 $ 2,568,150 100.0% $ 2,429,069 100.0% $ 139,081 (2.8)% 9.5 % 5.7 % NM 5.7 % Net premiums earned in the AmTrust Reinsurance segment increased by $159.4 million or 9.5% for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 which reflects the impact of AmTrust's strong growth in 2016 from a combination of acquisition activity and ongoing organic growth. Please refer to the analysis of our AmTrust Reinsurance segment on page 68 for further discussion. Net premiums earned in the Diversified Reinsurance segment decreased by $20.8 million or 2.8% for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 due to the impact of lower 2015 net premiums written for the segment. Please refer to the analysis of our Diversified Reinsurance segment on page 65 for further discussion. Other Insurance Revenue All of our Other Insurance Revenue is produced by our Diversified Reinsurance segment. Please refer to page 66 for further discussion. Net Investment Income, Net Realized Gains on Investment and Net Impairment Losses Recognized in Earnings Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 Net Investment Income - Net investment income increased by $20.5 million, or 14.0%, for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016, due to the growth in average invested assets of 8.6%. Additionally, a portion of the increase in net investment income is attributable to the call of certain securities during the year ended December 31, 2017, which generated additional amortization income of $7.2 million (2016 - $2.0 million). The following table details the Company's average invested assets and average book yield for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016: For the Year Ended December 31, Average invested assets(1) Average book yield(2) 2017 2016 ($ in thousands) $ 5,347,768 $ 4,925,316 3.1% 3.0% (1) The average of the Company's investments, cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and cash equivalents and loan to related party at each quarter-end during the year. (2) Ratio of net investment income over average invested assets at fair value. Net Realized Gains on Investment - Net realized gains on investment were $12.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to $6.8 million for the same period in 2016. Comparison of Years December 31, 2016 and 2015 Net Investment Income - Net investment income increased by $14.8 million, or 11.3%, for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015. For the year ended December 31, 2016, average invested assets grew by 12.9% giving rise to the increase in net investment income compared to the same period in 2015. The growth in net investment income, particularly when compared with the growth in invested assets, continues to be impacted by the current low interest rate environment which showed some improvement in the fourth quarter of 2016. The following table details the Company's average invested assets and average book yield for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015: For the Year Ended December 31, Average invested assets(1) Average book yield(2) 2016 2015 ($ in thousands) $ 4,925,316 $ 4,361,338 3.0% 3.0% (1) The average of the Company's investments, cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and loan to related party at each quarter-end during the year. (2) Ratio of net investment income over average invested assets at fair value. 62 Net Realized Gains on Investment - Net realized gains on investment were $6.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to $2.5 million for the same period in 2015. Net Impairment Losses Recognized in Earnings - The Company did not have an OTTI charge for the year ended December 31, 2016 but recognized $1.1 million of OTTI for the same period in 2015. Net Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 The net loss and LAE increase during the year ended December 31, 2017 was due to adverse prior year loss development of $321.5 million during 2017 compared to $165.3 million recorded in 2016. This development, which is discussed in greater detail in the individual segment discussion and analysis, was primarily in our AmTrust Reinsurance segment, but adverse prior year development was also experienced in our Diversified Reinsurance Segment and Other category. Excluding the impact of adverse prior year development, our net loss and LAE ratio would have been 67.0% for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 64.2% for the same period in 2016. The deterioration in loss ratios for the current year reflects increases we have made in our initial loss picks in both our Diversified Reinsurance and AmTrust Reinsurance segments factoring in both market conditions and recent loss trends and experience. The impact on the net loss and LAE ratios in each period should be considered in conjunction with the commission and other acquisition expense ratio as changes to either ratio can be affected by changes in the mix of business and the impact of the change in the commission and other acquisition expense rates on quota share contracts with loss sensitive features. As a result of these factors, as well as the adverse prior year loss development experienced in both the Diversified Reinsurance and AmTrust Reinsurance segments and our run-off business, the combined ratio increased by 8.1 points for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 2016. Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 Net loss and LAE increased by $186.3 million, or 11.4%, for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 2015. This increase reflects the continued growth of the business combined with $165.3 million of adverse reserve development experienced in both our Diversified Reinsurance and AmTrust Reinsurance segments as well as in our NGHC run-off business during 2016. The net loss and LAE ratios were 70.6% and 66.9% for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The impact on the net loss and LAE ratios should be considered in conjunction with the commission and other acquisition expense ratio as changes to either ratio arise primarily due to changes in the mix of business and the impact of the change in the commission and other acquisition expense rates on quota share contracts with loss sensitive features. As a result of these factors, combined with adverse prior year development in both our Diversified Reinsurance and AmTrust Reinsurance segments and on the run-off of the NGHC Quota Share, in our Other category, the combined ratio (excluding the general and administrative expense ratio) increased by 4.0 points for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 2015. Commission and Other Acquisition Expenses Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 Commission and other acquisition expenses increased by $47.1 million or 6.1% for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 2016. The commission and other acquisition expense ratios slightly decreased to 29.9% for the year ended December 31, 2017 from the same period in 2016. The commission and other acquisition expense ratio is largely dependent on the mix of business within the AmTrust Reinsurance segment and the mix of pro-rata and excess of loss business as well as the impact of loss sensitive features in some contracts within the Diversified Reinsurance segment. Please refer to the reasons for the changes in the combined ratio discussed in the Net Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses section above. Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 Commission and other acquisition expenses increased by $49.5 million, or 6.8%, for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to December 31, 2015. The commission and other acquisition expense ratio increased to 30.0% for the year December 31, 2016 compared to 29.7% for the same period in 2015. Please refer to the reasons for the changes in the combined ratio discussed in the Net Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses section above. 63 General and Administrative Expenses General and administrative expenses include expenses which are segregated for analytical purposes as a component of underwriting income. General and administrative expenses comprise: For the Year Ended December 31, General and administrative expenses – segments General and administrative expenses – corporate Total general and administrative expenses Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 2017 2016 2015 ($ in thousands) $ $ 38,869 $ 38,577 $ 31,691 28,407 70,560 $ 66,984 $ 38,328 26,544 64,872 Total general and administrative expenses increased by $3.6 million, or 5.3%, for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 2016 due to increases in legal, other professional fees and technology-related expenses offset by a decrease in employee related expenses. The general and administrative expense ratio remained flat at 2.6% for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 Total general and administrative expenses increased by $2.1 million, or 3.3%, for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 2015. The increase in total general and administrative expenses is primarily due to an increase in employee compensation and professional fees offset by a decrease in legal fees. The general and administrative expense ratio decreased to 2.6% for the year ended December 31, 2016 from 2.7% for the year ended December 31, 2015. Interest and Amortization Expenses Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 The interest and amortization expenses related to Senior Notes were $23.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to $28.2 million for the same period in 2016. The decrease in interest expense was due to the redemption of the 8% 2012 Senior Notes in June 2017 and the refinancing of the 8.25% 2011 Senior Notes with the 6.625% 2016 Senior Notes in June 2016. Please refer to "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 7. Long Term Debt" for details on the Company’s Senior Notes. The weighted average effective interest rate for the Company's debt was 7.7% for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 8.02% in 2016. On June 27, 2017, Maiden NA fully redeemed all of its 2012 Senior Notes using the proceeds from the Preference Shares - Series D issuance. The 2012 Senior Notes were redeemed at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of $100.0 million plus accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount being redeemed up to, but not including, the redemption date. As a result, the Company accelerated the amortization of the remaining 2012 Senior Note issuance cost of $2.8 million. Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 The interest and amortization expenses related to our Senior Notes were $28.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $29.1 million for the same period in 2015. The weighted average effective interest rate for the Company's debt was 8.02% for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 8.25% in 2015. Please refer to "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 7. Long Term Debt" for details on the Company’s Senior Notes. On June 15, 2016, Maiden NA fully redeemed all of its 2011 Senior Notes using the proceeds from the 2016 Senior Notes issuance. The 2011 Senior Notes were redeemed at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of $107.5 million plus accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount being redeemed up to, but not including, the redemption date. As a result, the Company accelerated the amortization of the remaining debt issuance cost of $2.3 million. Income Tax Expense The Company recorded income tax benefit of $3.6 million and income tax expense of $1.6 million and $2.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. These amounts relate to income tax on the earnings of our international subsidiaries, non-cash U.S. deferred tax expense relating to timing differences and state taxes incurred by our U.S. subsidiaries. The income tax benefit in 2017 mainly came from the U.S deferred tax liability due to the rate change resulting from the 2017 Act which was effective January 1, 2018. The effective rate of income tax was 2.1% for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 3.2% and 1.6% for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Dividends on Preference Shares For the year ended December 31, 2017, dividends paid to preference shareholders decreased by $4.6 million or 13.6% compared to the same period in 2016. The decrease is attributable to the conversion of the 7.25% Mandatory Convertible Preference Shares - Series B into the Company's common shares on September 15, 2016. This decrease in dividends paid was partially offset by the $5.0 million of dividends paid on the Preference Shares - Series D during the year ended December 31, 2017 (please see discussion below for details). On June 15, 2017, the Company issued a total of 6,000,000, 6.7% Preference Shares – Series D, par value $0.01 per share, at a price of $25 per preference share. Please refer to "Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements Note 13. Shareholders' Equity" for details on the Company’s preference shares. 64 Underwriting Results by Reportable Segment Diversified Reinsurance Segment The underwriting results and associated ratios for our Diversified Reinsurance segment for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 were as follows: For the Year Ended December 31, Gross premiums written Net premiums written Net premiums earned Other insurance revenue Net loss and LAE Commission and other acquisition expenses General and administrative expenses Underwriting (loss) income Ratios Net loss and LAE ratio Commission and other acquisition expense ratio General and administrative expense ratio Expense ratio Combined ratio 2017 2016 2015 ($ in thousands) $ 822,777 $ 824,341 $ 776,852 807,362 823,365 9,802 (650,916) (205,982) (35,817) (59,548) $ 766,119 724,124 10,817 (579,520) (188,506) (35,681) (68,766) $ 734,781 744,875 11,512 (547,296) (196,292) (35,312) (22,513) $ 78.1% 24.7% 4.3% 29.0% 78.9% 25.6% 4.9% 30.5% 72.3% 26.0% 4.7% 30.7% 107.1% 109.4% 103.0% Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 The combined ratio for the year ended December 31, 2017 decreased to 107.1% compared to 109.4% in 2016. The decrease in the combined ratio for the year ended December 31, 2017 was due to the following: • Adverse prior year loss development of $71.4 million during 2017, compared to $96.8 million recorded in the same period in 2016. The 2017 development was largely due to a higher than expected loss emergence emanating largely from commercial auto as well as certain specific contracts across several lines of business, with over half of the development coming from two accounts. The 2016 adverse prior year development was primarily from the commercial auto liability line of business; and • Excluding prior year loss development, the combined ratio for 2017 would have been 98.6% compared to 96.2% for 2016, reflecting higher initial expected loss ratios for premiums earned during the period. Premiums - Gross premiums written decreased by $1.6 million, or 0.2% for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. The decrease was primarily due to the commutation and return of the unearned premium of a large account during the second quarter of 2017. Net premiums written for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased by $41.2 million or 5.4% as a result of the reduction in the corporate retrocessional program for 2017 and new business written partly offset by the decrease in gross premiums written previously described. The retention ratio of written premiums increased to 98.1% for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 92.9% for the same period in 2016 due to the lower utilization of retrocessional capacity in 2017. 65 The table below shows net premiums written by line of business for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016: For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 2016 Change in Total % of Total Total % of Total $ % ($ in thousands) Net Premiums Written Property Casualty Accident and Health International ($ in thousands) Net Premiums Earned Property Casualty Accident and Health International $ 155,925 482,160 86,743 82,534 19.3% $ 59.7% 10.8% 10.2% 141,353 466,089 80,004 78,673 18.5% $ 60.8% 10.4% 10.3% 14,572 16,071 6,739 3,861 10.3% 3.4% 8.4% 4.9% 5.4% Total Diversified Reinsurance $ 807,362 100.0% $ 766,119 100.0% $ 41,243 Net premiums earned increased by $99.2 million, or 13.7%, during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. The table below shows net premiums earned by line of business: For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 2016 Change in Total % of Total Total % of Total $ % $ 157,466 496,301 86,571 83,027 19.1% $ 60.3% 10.5% 10.1% 136,629 432,509 74,204 80,782 18.9% $ 59.7% 10.2% 11.2% 20,837 63,792 12,367 2,245 99,241 15.3% 14.7% 16.7% 2.8% 13.7% Total Diversified Reinsurance $ 823,365 100.0% $ 724,124 100.0% $ Within our Diversified Reinsurance segment, the business written by Maiden US experienced an increase in net premiums earned for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 due to overall growth in all sub-segments as well as a reduction in the corporate retrocessional program for 2017. These increases were partly offset by the commutation of a large account during the second quarter of 2017. Other Insurance Revenue - Other insurance revenue, which represents fee income that is not directly associated with premium revenue assumed by the Company decreased by $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. Net Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses - Net loss and LAE increased by $71.4 million, or 12.3%, for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 2016. Net loss and LAE ratios were 78.1% and 78.9% for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The net loss and LAE ratio decrease for the year ended December 31, 2017 was due to the following: • Adverse prior year loss development of $71.4 million during 2017, compared to $96.8 million recorded in the same period in 2016. The 2017 development was largely due to higher than expected loss emergence emanating largely from commercial auto as well as certain specific contracts across several lines of business, with over half of the development coming from two accounts. The 2016 adverse prior year development was primarily from the commercial auto liability line of business in Maiden US of $85.7 million. • Excluding prior year loss development, the net loss and LAE ratio for 2017 would have been 69.6% compared to 65.7% for 2016, reflecting higher initial expected loss ratios for premiums earned during the year ended December 31, 2017. The impact on the net loss and LAE ratios should be considered in conjunction with the commission and other acquisition expense ratio as changes to either ratio can be effected by the changes in the mix of business and the impact of the increase in the commission and other acquisition expense rates on pro-rata contracts with loss sensitive features. As a result of these factors, as well as the impacts on the loss ratio described above, the combined ratio decreased by 2.3 points for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 2016. Commission and Other Acquisition Expenses - Commission and other acquisition expenses increased by $17.5 million, or 9.3%, for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 2016. The commission and other acquisition expense ratios decreased to 24.7% for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 25.6% for the same period in 2016. The decrease in ratios for the year ended December 31, 2017 was primarily due to the change in the mix of pro rata versus excess of loss premiums written. Please refer to the reasons for the changes in the combined ratio discussed in the preceding paragraph. General and Administrative Expenses - General and administrative expenses increased by $0.1 million, or 0.4%, for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 2016. The general and administrative expense ratio was 4.3% and 4.9% for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The overall expense ratio (including commission and other acquisition expenses) was 29.0% and 30.5% for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. 66 ($ in thousands) Net Premiums Written Property Casualty Accident and Health International ($ in thousands) Net Premiums Earned Property Casualty Accident and Health International Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 The combined ratio increased to 109.4% for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 103.0% for the year ended December 31, 2015. Reserve development in commercial auto continued to unfavorably impact our Diversified Reinsurance segment resulting in underwriting losses. Premiums - Gross premiums written increased by $47.5 million, or 6.1% for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015. The increase was primarily due to growth resulting from existing client accounts and premium from new customers won throughout the year as well as the new European treaty contracts written by Maiden Bermuda in 2016. Net premiums written increased by $31.3 million or 4.3%, for the year December 31, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015 due to the same circumstances as described above related to this segment's gross premiums written. The table below illustrates net premiums written by line of business in this segment: For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 2015 Change in Total % of Total Total % of Total $ % $ 141,353 466,089 80,004 78,673 18.5% $ 60.8% 10.4% 10.3% 160,939 435,625 64,102 74,115 59.3% 8.7% 10.1% 21.9% $ (19,586) (12.2)% 30,464 15,902 4,558 31,338 7.0 % 24.8 % 6.1 % 4.3 % Total Diversified Reinsurance $ 766,119 100.0% $ 734,781 100.0% $ Net premiums earned decreased by $20.8 million, or 2.8%, during the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015. The table below shows net premiums earned by line of business: For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 2015 Change in Total % of Total Total % of Total $ % $ 136,629 432,509 74,204 80,782 18.9% $ 59.7% 10.2% 11.2% 157,186 449,000 55,672 83,017 21.1% $ 60.3% 7.5% 11.1% (20,557) (16,491) 18,532 (2,235) (13.1)% (3.7)% 33.3 % (2.7)% (2.8)% Total Diversified Reinsurance $ 724,124 100.0% $ 744,875 100.0% $ (20,751) Within our Diversified Reinsurance segment, the business written by both Maiden US and our IIS operations experienced a decrease in net premiums earned for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 due to the impact of higher ceded premiums related to the retrocessional quota share agreement entered in 2015. The decrease, however, was slightly reduced by earned premiums from the European treaty contracts written by Maiden Bermuda in 2016. Other Insurance Revenue - Other insurance revenue, which represents fee income that is not directly associated with premium revenue assumed by the Company decreased by $0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015. The decrease was mainly caused by weaker auto sales in Europe. Net Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses - Net loss and LAE increased by $32.2 million, or 5.9%, for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 2015. Net loss and LAE ratios were 78.9% and 72.3% for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, reflecting further adverse prior year development primarily from commercial auto liability in Maiden US of $85.7 million. The impact on the net loss and LAE ratios should be considered in conjunction with the commission and other acquisition expense ratio as changes to either ratio arise primarily due to changes in the mix of business and the impact of the increase in the commission and other acquisition expense rates on pro-rata contracts with loss sensitive features. As a result of these factors, the combined ratio (excluding the general and administrative expense ratio) increased by 6.2 points for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 2015. Commission and Other Acquisition Expenses - Commission and other acquisition expenses decreased by $7.8 million, or 4.0%, for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 2015. The commission and other acquisition expense ratios decreased to 25.6% for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 26.0% for the same period in 2015. Please refer to the reasons for the changes in the combined ratio discussed in the preceding paragraph. General and Administrative Expenses - General and administrative expenses increased by $0.4 million, or 1.0%, for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 2015. The general and administrative expense ratio was 4.9% and 4.7% for the years ended 67 December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The overall expense ratio (including commission and other acquisition expenses) was 30.5% and 30.7% for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. AmTrust Reinsurance Segment The AmTrust Reinsurance segment reported an underwriting loss of $207.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to underwriting income of $30.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 and $79.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The underwriting results and associated ratios for the AmTrust Reinsurance segment for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 were as follows: For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 Gross premiums written Net premiums written Net premiums earned Net loss and LAE Commission and other acquisition expenses General and administrative expenses Underwriting income Ratios Net loss and LAE ratio Commission and other acquisition expense ratio General and administrative expense ratio Expense ratio Combined ratio ($ in thousands) $ 1,993,478 $ 2,006,646 $ 1,885,974 1,954,856 1,909,644 1,888,428 1,843,621 1,779,334 1,684,191 (1,498,881) (1,225,830) (1,074,072) (614,777) (584,820) (527,863) (3,052) (2,896) (3,016) $ (207,066) $ 30,075 $ 79,240 78.4% 32.2% 0.2% 32.4% 110.8% 66.5% 31.7% 0.2% 31.9% 98.4% 63.8% 31.3% 0.2% 31.5% 95.3% Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 The AmTrust Reinsurance segment experienced an increase in the combined ratio to 110.8% for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 98.4% during the same period in 2016 due to the following: • Adverse prior year loss development of $239.9 million during 2017 compared to $54.0 million recorded in 2016. More than half of the prior year loss development in 2017 was from workers' compensation, the largest line of business in the AmTrust Reinsurance segment. Other significant adverse loss development occurred during 2017 in the general liability and, to a lesser extent, commercial auto lines of business in AmTrust's Specialty Program and Small Commercial Business segments. The 2016 loss development was largely due to a fourth quarter reserve charge of $52.0 million related primarily to program commercial auto as well as program general liability. • Excluding prior year loss development, the combined ratio for the current period in 2017 was 98.3% compared to 95.5% for 2016, reflecting higher initial expected loss ratios for premiums earned during the period. Premiums - Net premiums written in our AmTrust Reinsurance segment increased by $66.4 million or 3.5% during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. The table below shows net premiums written by line of business for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016: For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 2016 Change in ($ in thousands) Total % of Total Total % of Total $ % Net Premiums Written Small Commercial Business Specialty Program Specialty Risk and Extended Warranty $ 1,278,974 65.4% $ 1,181,496 62.6% $ 350,113 17.9% 344,677 18.2% 325,769 16.7% 362,255 19.2% Total AmTrust Reinsurance $ 1,954,856 100.0% $ 1,888,428 100.0% $ 97,478 5,436 8.3 % 1.6 % (36,486) 66,428 (10.1)% 3.5 % The increase in net premiums written was due to the lower utilization of retrocessional capacity in 2017, which decreased by $79.6 million compared to 2016. The retention ratio of written premiums increased to 98.1% for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 94.1% for the same period in 2016. In addition, gross premiums written decreased by $13.2 million or 0.7% for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. The decrease in gross premiums written reflects the 68 reductions in AmTrust's Specialty Risk & Warranty segment primarily due to continued declines in premium associated with its European Hospital Liability business. AmTrust's Small Commercial and Specialty Program segments are experiencing slower rates of organic growth due to market conditions and underwriting initiatives focused on improving the profitability of these classes of business. Net premiums earned increased by $66.0 million, or 3.6% for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. Please see net premiums written section above for details related to the movement in earned premium. The retroceded premiums earned decreased by $27.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. The table below details net premiums earned by line of business for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016: For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 2016 Change in ($ in thousands) Total % of Total Total % of Total $ % Net Premiums Earned Small Commercial Business Specialty Program Specialty Risk and Extended Warranty $ 1,255,941 65.8% $ 1,131,582 61.4% $ 124,359 344,336 18.0% 337,396 18.3% 6,940 11.0 % 2.1 % (17.4)% 3.6 % (65,276) 66,023 Total AmTrust Reinsurance $ 1,909,644 100.0% $ 1,843,621 100.0% $ 309,367 16.2% 374,643 20.3% Net Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses - Net loss and LAE increased by $273.1 million, or 22.3%, for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. Net loss and LAE ratios were 78.4% and 66.5% for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The net loss and LAE ratio for the year ended December 31, 2017 increased primarily due to the following: • Adverse prior year loss development of $239.9 million during 2017, compared to $54.0 million recorded in 2016. More than half of the adverse prior year loss development in 2017 was from workers' compensation, the largest line of business in the AmTrust Reinsurance segment. Other significant drivers during 2017 were general liability and, to a lesser extent, commercial auto from both Specialty Program and Small Commercial Business. The 2016 adverse prior year development was largely due to a fourth quarter reserve charge of $52.0 million related primarily to program commercial auto as well as program general liability reserves; and • Excluding prior year loss development, the net loss and LAE ratio for 2017 was 65.9% compared to 63.6% for 2016, reflecting higher initial expected loss ratios for premiums earned during the period. Commission and Other Acquisition Expenses - Commission and other acquisition expenses increased by $30.0 million, or 5.1%, for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared the same period in 2016. The commission and other acquisition expense ratio increased to 32.2% for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 31.7% in 2016. The fluctuations in the ratios during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to 2016 reflect the change in the mix of business. The commission ratio is also affected by the commission associated with the retrocession premium ceded during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. General and Administrative Expenses - General and administrative expenses increased by $0.2 million, or 5.4%, for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. The general and administrative expense ratio has remained unchanged at 0.2% for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The overall expense ratio (including commission and other acquisition expenses) was 32.4% and 31.9% for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 The AmTrust Reinsurance segment experienced growth during the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 2015. However, the combined ratio increased to 98.4% for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 95.3% in 2015 largely due to adverse reserve development of $54.0 million related primarily to program commercial auto as well as program general liability business. Premiums - Gross premiums written increased by $120.7 million or 6.4% for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015. Growth in our AmTrust Reinsurance segment is due to additional 2016 premium relating to acquisitions made by AmTrust that were ceded to us for the first time, ongoing organic growth and also reflects the removal of certain classes of business which we commuted with AmTrust in the fourth quarter of 2015. The table below shows net premiums written by line of business for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015: 69 11.7 % 3.7 % (6.9)% 6.1 % 15.0 % 16.3 % (8.5)% 9.5 % For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 2015 Change in ($ in thousands) Total % of Total Total % of Total $ % $ 1,181,496 62.6% $ 1,057,968 59.5% $ 123,528 344,677 18.2% 332,416 18.7% 12,261 Total AmTrust Reinsurance $ 1,888,428 100.0% $ 1,779,334 100.0% $ 362,255 19.2% 388,950 21.8% (26,695) 109,094 Net premiums earned increased by $159.4 million, or 9.5% for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015. The increase is primarily due to AmTrust's prior year written premium growth. The table below details net premiums earned by line of business for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015: For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 2015 Change in ($ in thousands) Total % of Total Total % of Total $ % Net Premiums Written Small Commercial Business Specialty Program Specialty Risk and Extended Warranty Net Premiums Earned Small Commercial Business Specialty Program Specialty Risk and Extended Warranty $ 1,131,582 61.4% $ 337,396 18.3% 984,333 290,209 58.5% $ 147,249 17.2% 47,187 Total AmTrust Reinsurance $ 1,843,621 100.0% $ 1,684,191 100.0% $ 374,643 20.3% 409,649 24.3% (35,006) 159,430 Net Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses - Net loss and LAE increased by $151.8 million, or 14.1%, for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015. Net loss and LAE ratios were 66.5% and 63.8% for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The net loss and LAE ratio increased largely due to the $54.0 million adverse reserve development experienced in 2016, which primarily affected program commercial auto as well as program general liability reserves. Commission and Other Acquisition Expenses - Commission and other acquisition expenses increased by $57.0 million, or 10.8%, for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 2015. The commission and other acquisition expense ratio increased to 31.7% for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 31.3% in 2015. The increase in the ratio during the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to 2015 reflects the higher proportion of net premiums earned from the Reinsurance Agreement, which has a higher commission rate than the European Hospital Liability Quota Share. General and Administrative Expenses - General and administrative expenses decreased by $0.1 million, or 4.0%, for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015. The general and administrative expense ratio has remained flat at 0.2% for both years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. The overall expense ratio (including commission and other acquisition expenses) was 31.9% and 31.5% for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. 70 Liquidity and Capital Resources Liquidity Maiden Holdings is a holding company and transacts no business of its own. We therefore rely on cash flows in the form of dividends, advances, loans and other permitted distributions from our subsidiary companies to make dividend payments on our common and preference shares. The jurisdictions in which our operating subsidiaries are licensed to write business impose regulations requiring companies to maintain or meet statutory solvency and liquidity requirements. Some jurisdictions also place restrictions on the declaration and payment of dividends and other distributions. The amount of dividends that can be distributed from Maiden Bermuda is, under certain circumstances, limited under Bermuda law and Bermuda regulatory requirements, which requires our Bermuda operating subsidiary to maintain certain measures of solvency and liquidity in accordance with the BSCR. At December 31, 2017, the statutory capital and surplus of Maiden Bermuda was $1,206.0 million. Maiden Bermuda is allowed to pay dividends or distributions not exceeding $301.5 million. During 2017 and 2016, Maiden Bermuda paid dividends of $105.0 million and $445.0 million, respectively, to Maiden Holdings. Maiden US is subject to regulatory restrictions limiting their ability to declare and pay dividends by the state of Missouri where it is domiciled. Without prior approval of its domiciliary commissioner, dividends to shareholders are limited by the laws of Missouri to the greater of 10% of statutory policyholders’ surplus at the preceding December 31, or net income, less net realized capital gain on investments, for the 12-month period ending December 31 of the preceding year. Additionally, Maiden US may only pay dividends if it has positive unassigned funds. Accordingly, the maximum dividend payments that can be made to shareholders in the next year without prior approval by the Missouri Department of Insurance is $0. During 2017 and 2016, Maiden US paid no dividends to Maiden NA. In addition, there are restrictions based on risk-based capital, a test which is the threshold that constitutes the authorized control level. If Maiden US's statutory capital and surplus falls below the authorized control level, the insurance regulator is authorized to take whatever regulatory actions are considered necessary to protect policyholders and creditors. At December 31, 2017, Maiden US has statutory capital and surplus of $301.7 million, which exceeds the required level of minimum statutory capital and surplus by the state of Missouri. Maiden Holdings has two Swedish domiciled operating subsidiaries, Maiden LF and Maiden GF, both regulated by the Swedish FSA. At December 31, 2017, Maiden LF and Maiden GF each has a statutory capital and surplus of $8.5 million and $6.4 million, respectively, which exceed the amount required to be maintained of $4.4 million at December 31, 2017. Maiden LF and Maiden GF are subject to statutory and regulatory restrictions under the Swedish FSA that limit the maximum amount of annual dividends or distributions paid by Maiden LF and Maiden GF to Maiden Holdings. At December 31, 2017, Maiden LF and Maiden GF are allowed to pay dividends or distributions not exceeding $2.5 million and $0, respectively. During 2017 and 2016, Maiden LF and Maiden GF paid no dividends. Maiden GF was granted a general insurance license effective September 14, 2016 and began writing business in 2017 therefore its first filing with the Swedish FSA is for the period ended December 31, 2017. Maiden Holdings’ wholly owned U.K. subsidiary, Maiden Global, operates as a reinsurance services and holding company, is subject to regulation by the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority (the "FCA") that limit the maximum amount of annual dividends or distributions paid by Maiden Global to the Company. At December 31, 2017, Maiden Global is allowed to pay dividends or distributions not exceeding $3.3 million. During 2017 and 2016, Maiden Global paid dividends to Maiden Holdings of $0.7 million and $0, respectively. Our sources of funds primarily consist of premium receipts net of commissions and brokerage, investment income, net proceeds from capital raising activities, which may include the issuance of debt and common and preference shares, and proceeds from sales and redemption of investments. Cash is used primarily to pay loss and LAE, ceded reinsurance premium, general and administrative expenses, interest expense and dividends, with the remainder in excess of our operating requirements, made available to our investment managers for investment in accordance with our investment policy. The table below summarizes our operating, investing and financing cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015: For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 Operating activities Investing activities Financing activities Effect of exchange rate changes on foreign currency cash ($ in thousands) $ 458,534 $ 470,132 $ 634,298 (378,894) (60,418) 2,950 (439,204) (76,780) 1,958 (750,678) 99,751 (1,849) Total increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents $ 22,172 $ (43,894) $ (18,478) 71 Cash Flows from Operating Activities Cash flows from operations for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $458.5 million compared to $470.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, a 2.5% decrease. In 2016, operating cash flows were reduced by the settlement of a $107.0 million commutation with AmTrust. Excluding the impact of the commutation, cash flows from operations for the year ended December 31, 2017 were $118.6 million or 20.5% lower compared to the same period in 2016. This net decrease was the result of higher payment of losses and decline in gross premiums written in 2017 compared to 2016, offset by the increase in reserves for loss and LAE during the year ended December 31, 2017 of $187.8 million, which reflects the adverse prior year development recognized during 2017. Cash Flows from Investing Activities Cash flows from investing activities consist primarily of proceeds from the sales and maturities of investments and payments for investments acquired. Net cash used in investing activities was $378.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to $439.2 million for the same period in 2016. The Company continues to deploy available cash for longer-term investments as investment conditions permit and to maintain, where possible, cash and cash equivalents balances at low levels. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the purchases of fixed maturity securities exceeded the proceeds from the sales, maturities and calls by $365.6 million. Adding to the outflow was the increase in restricted cash and cash equivalents of $19.0 million offset by the net proceeds from other investing activities of $5.8 million. Cash Flows from Financing Activities The net cash (used in) provided by financing activities for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was as follows: For the Year Ended December 31, Cash flows from Financing Activities Preference shares, net of issuance costs Issuance of common shares Repurchase of common shares Dividends paid - preference shares Dividends paid - Maiden common shareholders Redemption of 2012 senior notes 2016 Senior notes, net of issuance costs Redemption of 2011 senior notes 2017 2016 2015 ($ in thousands) $ 144,942 $ 1,081 (25,651) (29,156) (51,634) (100,000) — — (143) $ 1,931 (470) (33,756) (43,127) — 106,285 (107,500) 159,628 3,318 (654) (24,337) (38,204) — — — Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities $ (60,418) $ (76,780) $ 99,751 Cash flows used in financing activities were $60.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to $76.8 million for the same period in 2016. The decrease in net cash outflow for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 was due to the issuance of new preference shares with net proceeds of $144.9 million, which was partially used to redeem the 2012 senior notes issuance of $100.0 million. The net proceeds from the preference share issue were also offset by the repurchase of common shares of $25.7 million during 2017, the bulk of which was made under the Company's authorized share repurchase program. In addition, there was a decrease in dividends paid on preference shares of $4.6 million due to the mandatory conversion of Preference Shares Series B to Maiden's common shares during the third quarter of 2016, offset by the increase in dividends paid to common shareholders of $8.5 million due to an increased number of common shares outstanding as well as a higher dividend rate in 2017. Restrictions, Collateral and Specific Requirements Maiden Bermuda is generally required to post collateral security with respect to any reinsurance liabilities it assumes from ceding insurers domiciled in the U.S. in order for U.S. ceding companies to obtain credit on their U.S. statutory financial statements with respect to insurance liabilities ceded to them. Under applicable statutory provisions, the security arrangements may be in the form of letters of credit, reinsurance trusts maintained by trustees or funds withheld arrangements where assets are held by the ceding company. Maiden Bermuda uses trust accounts, loan to related party and letters of credit to meet collateral requirements. Consequently, cash and cash equivalents and investments are pledged in favor of ceding companies in order to comply with relevant insurance regulations or contractual requirements. Maiden US also offers to its clients, on a voluntary basis, the ability to collateralize certain liabilities related to the reinsurance contracts it issues. Under these arrangements, Maiden retains broad investment discretion in order to achieve its business objectives while giving clients the additional security a collateralized arrangement offers. We believe this offers the Company a significant competitive advantage and improves Maiden US’s retention of high-quality clients. 72 At December 31, 2017 and 2016, restricted cash and cash equivalents and fixed maturity investments used as collateral were $4.9 billion and $4.4 billion, respectively. This collateral represents 90.8% and 90.0% of the fair value of our total fixed maturity investments and cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash and cash equivalents) at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The $469.7 million increase was primarily attributable to the increase in assets provided as collateral for the AmTrust Reinsurance segment reflecting continued growth in both premiums and reserves. The following table details additional information on those assets used as collateral at December 31, 2017 and 2016: December 31, ($ in thousands) Maiden US Maiden Bermuda Diversified Reinsurance Maiden Bermuda AmTrust Reinsurance Maiden Bermuda Other Total Restricted Cash & Equivalents 23,272 $ 27,791 51,063 72,350 72,350 171 2017 Fixed Maturities Total $1,028,975 $1,052,247 170,698 1,199,673 3,503,834 3,503,834 198,489 1,250,736 3,576,184 3,576,184 13,608 13,779 Restricted Cash & Equivalents 26,990 $ 26,993 53,983 49,327 49,327 478 2016 Fixed Maturities Total $ 994,638 $1,021,628 199,172 1,193,810 3,088,483 3,088,483 226,165 1,247,793 3,137,810 3,137,810 12,715 13,193 171 $ 123,584 13,608 $4,717,115 13,779 $4,840,699 478 $ 103,788 12,715 $4,295,008 13,193 $4,398,796 As a % of Consolidated Balance Sheet captions 100.0% 91.7% 91.9% 100.0% 90.9% 91.1% Maiden Bermuda has also loaned funds to AmTrust totaling $168.0 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, to partially satisfy its collateral requirements with AII. Advances under the loan have been secured by promissory notes and the loan is carried at cost. Collateral arrangements with ceding insurers may subject our assets to security interests or require that a portion of our assets be pledged to, or otherwise held by, third parties. Both our trust accounts and letters of credit are fully collateralized by assets held in custodial accounts. Although the investment income derived from our assets, while held in trust, accrues to our benefit, the investment of these assets is governed by the terms of the letter of credit facilities or the investment regulations of the state or territory of domicile of the ceding insurer, which may be more restrictive than the investment regulations applicable to us under Bermuda law. The restrictions may result in lower investment yields on these assets, which may adversely affect our profitability. We do not currently anticipate that the restrictions on liquidity resulting from restrictions on the payments of dividends by our subsidiary companies or from assets committed in trust accounts or those assets used to collateralize the letter of credit facilities will have a material impact on our ability to carry out our normal business activities, including our ability to make dividend payments on our common and preference shares. Investments The investment of our funds is designed to ensure safety of principal while generating current income. Accordingly, our funds are invested in liquid, investment-grade fixed income securities which are designated as either AFS or HTM. In 2017 and 2016, the Company designated certain corporate and municipal bonds previously classified as AFS to HTM to reflect our intention of holding these bonds until maturity. See "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 4. Investments" included under Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this Form 10-K. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury bond decreased by 5 basis points to 2.40%. The 10-year U.S. Treasury is the key risk-free determinant in the fair value of many of the securities in our AFS portfolio. After steadily falling to its yearly low of 2.05% in September 2017, the yields on the 10-year U.S. Treasury bond recovered 35 basis points in the last four months of 2017 to finish at 2.40%. The upward shift in the U.S. Treasury yield curve reflects a strengthening U.S. economy and the prospect of inflation. A strong U.S. labor market and higher government spending has encouraged central banks to move away from monetary easing policy at a gradual pace. The movement in the market values of our AFS fixed maturity portfolio was a net gain of $50.4 million, primarily due to foreign exchange gains of $59.8 million arising mainly on our euro-denominated investment portfolio following the strengthening of the euro versus the U.S. dollar during the year ended December 31, 2017. Please see "Liquidity and Capital Resources - Capital Resources" on page 78 for further information. At December 31, 2017, we consider the levels of cash and cash equivalents we are holding to be within our targeted ranges. During periods when interest rates experience greater volatility, we have periodically maintained more cash and cash equivalents in order to better assess current market conditions and opportunities within our defined risk appetite, and may do so in future periods. In order to limit our exposure to unexpected interest rate increases which would reduce the value of our fixed income securities and reduce our shareholders' equity, we attempt to maintain the duration of our fixed maturity investment portfolio combined with our cash and cash equivalents, both restricted and unrestricted, within a reasonable range of the duration of our loss reserves. 73 At December 31, 2017 and 2016, these respective durations in years were as follows: December 31, Fixed maturities and cash and cash equivalents Reserve for loss and LAE 2017 2016 4.4 3.6 4.9 3.8 During the year ended December 31, 2017, the weighted average duration of our fixed maturity investment portfolio decreased by 0.5 years to 4.4 years and the duration for reserve for loss and LAE decreased by 0.2 years to 3.6 years. The differential in duration between these assets and liabilities may fluctuate over time and, in the case of fixed maturities, is affected by factors such as market conditions, changes in asset mix and prepayment speeds in the case of both our agency MBS and commercial mortgage- backed securities ("CMBS"). The average yield and average duration of our fixed maturities, by asset class, and our cash and cash equivalents (restricted and unrestricted) are as follows: December 31, 2017 AFS fixed maturities U.S. treasury bonds U.S. agency bonds – mortgage-backed U.S. agency bonds – other Non-U.S. government and supranational bonds Asset-backed securities Corporate bonds Municipal bonds Total AFS fixed maturities HTM fixed maturities Corporate bonds Municipal bonds Total HTM fixed maturities Cash and cash equivalents Total December 31, 2016 AFS fixed maturities U.S. treasury bonds U.S. agency bonds – mortgage-backed U.S. agency bonds – other Non-U.S. government and supranational bonds Asset-backed securities Corporate bonds Municipal bonds Total AFS fixed maturities HTM fixed maturities Corporate bonds Total HTM fixed maturities Cash and cash equivalents Original or Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Average yield(1) Average duration(2) ($ in thousands) $ 60,711 $ 103 $ (13) $ 60,801 2,026,305 29,941 33,381 317,544 8,074 4 231 4,065 (19,765) (163) (1,736) (199) 2,014,614 29,782 31,876 321,410 1,557,611 43,271 (17,571) 1,583,311 2,500 76 4,027,993 55,824 — (39,447) 2,576 4,044,370 1,037,464 60,337 1,097,801 191,503 28,694 128 28,822 — $ 5,317,297 $ 84,646 $ 1,065,245 60,381 1,125,626 (913) (84) (997) — 191,503 (40,444) $5,361,499 1.4% 2.9% 3.1% 2.7% 4.0% 3.1% 4.2% 3.0% 3.6% 3.2% 3.6% 0.2% 3.0% 0.2 4.7 8.5 3.1 2.1 5.0 3.5 4.4 5.0 4.8 5.0 0.0 4.4 Original or Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Average yield(1) Average duration(2) ($ in thousands) $ 5,186 1,720,436 $ 238 12,867 18,082 35,158 217,232 1,947,347 62,201 4,005,642 752,212 752,212 149,535 20 73 3,713 30,951 2,897 50,759 16,370 16,370 — $ (11) $ (17,265) — (5,297) (69) 5,413 1,716,038 18,102 29,934 220,876 (62,093) 1,916,205 — (84,735) 65,098 3,971,666 (2,447) (2,447) — 766,135 766,135 149,535 (87,182) $4,887,336 3.0% 2.8% 3.2% 2.4% 4.6% 3.5% 4.2% 3.2% 3.6% 0.1% 2.4 4.9 8.9 3.4 2.5 5.4 6.5 5.1 5.2 0.0 Total $ (1) Average yield is calculated by dividing annualized investment income for each sub-component of AFS and HTM securities and cash and cash equivalents $ 4,907,389 67,129 3.2% 4.9 $ (including amortization of premium or discount) by amortized cost. (2) Average duration in years. 74 The following table summarizes the Company's fixed maturity investment portfolio holdings by contractual maturity at December 31, 2017 and 2016: December 31, ($ in thousands) Due in one year or less Due after one year through five years Due after five years through ten years Due after ten years U.S. agency bonds – mortgage-backed Asset-backed securities Total fixed maturities 2017 2016 AFS fixed maturities Fair Value 91,054 582,583 1,009,652 25,057 1,708,346 2,014,614 321,410 4,044,370 $ $ HTM fixed maturities Amortized cost 40,533 $ $ 333,003 724,265 — 1,097,801 — — 1,097,801 $ $ AFS fixed maturities Fair Value 61,219 560,141 1,371,356 42,036 2,034,752 1,716,038 220,876 3,971,666 HTM fixed maturities Amortized Cost — $ 260,557 486,568 5,087 752,212 — — 752,212 $ At December 31, 2017, 98.5% of the Company’s U.S. agency bond holdings are mortgage-backed. Additional details on the Agency MBS at December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows: December 31, ($ in thousands) U.S. agency bonds - mortgage-backed Residential mortgage-backed (RMBS) GNMA – fixed rate FNMA – fixed rate FNMA – variable rate FHLMC – fixed rate FHLMC – variable rate Total U.S. agency bonds - mortgage-backed Non-MBS fixed rate U.S. agency bonds 2017 2016 Fair Value % of Total Fair Value % of Total $ 241,238 11.8% $ 1,007,345 — 766,031 — 2,014,614 29,782 49.3% —% 37.4% —% 98.5% 1.5% 368,142 800,947 17,761 523,983 5,205 1,716,038 18,102 21.2% 46.2% 1.0% 30.2% 0.3% 98.9% 1.1% Total U.S. agency bonds $ 2,044,396 100.0% $ 1,734,140 100.0% The following table provides a summary of changes in fair value associated with our Agency MBS portfolio: December 31, Agency MBS: Beginning balance Purchases Sales, calls and paydowns Net realized (losses) gains on sales – included in net (loss) income Change in net unrealized losses – included in other comprehensive income Amortization of bond premium and discount Ending balance 2017 2016 ($ in thousands) $ 1,716,038 $ 1,476,991 790,174 (478,462) (992) (7,293) (4,851) 2,014,614 $ 637,072 (381,529) 230 (9,633) (7,093) 1,716,038 $ Our Agency MBS portfolio is 39.2% of our fixed maturity investments at December 31, 2017. Given the relative size of this portfolio to our total investments, if faster prepayment patterns were to occur over an extended period of time, this could potentially limit the growth in our investment income in certain circumstances, or even potentially reduce the total amount of investment income we earn. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, 99.0% and 96.5%, respectively, of our fixed maturity investments consisted of investment grade securities. We define a security as being below investment grade if it has an S&P credit rating of BB+ or equivalent, or less. 75 The following summarizes the credit ratings of our fixed maturities: Ratings(1) at December 31, ($ in thousands) U.S. treasury bonds U.S. agency bonds AAA AA+, AA, AA- A+, A, A- BBB+, BBB, BBB- BB+ or lower Total 2017 2016 Amortized cost Fair value Amortized cost Fair value $ 60,711 $ 60,801 $ 5,186 $ 5,413 2,056,246 2,044,396 1,738,518 1,734,140 245,562 204,792 1,381,031 1,125,471 51,981 249,073 207,898 1,404,451 1,149,511 53,866 170,515 238,315 1,386,023 1,053,529 165,768 171,090 237,169 1,374,860 1,047,376 167,753 $ 5,125,794 $ 5,169,996 $ 4,757,854 $ 4,737,801 (1) Ratings as assigned by S&P, or equivalent The security holdings by sector and financial strength rating of our corporate bond holdings at December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows: Ratings(1) December 31, 2017 AAA AA+, AA, AA- A+, A, A- BBB+, BBB, BBB- BB+ or lower Fair Value Corporate bonds Basic Materials Communications Consumer Energy Financial Institutions Industrials Technology Total Corporate bonds —% —% —% —% 1.4% —% —% 1.4% —% 0.6% 0.6% 1.0% 2.5% —% 1.2% 5.9% 1.5% 1.0% 12.4% 3.9% 24.2% 2.4% 2.6% 48.0% Ratings(1) 4.1% 5.9% 12.9% 3.3% 12.4% 3.3% 0.8% 42.7% Corporate bonds Basic Materials Communications Consumer Energy Financial Institutions Industrials Technology Total Corporate bonds —% —% —% —% 1.4% —% —% 1.4% —% 0.5% 0.4% 1.0% 2.3% 0.8% 2.2% 7.2% 1.5% 1.3% 14.9% 3.8% 22.1% 2.0% 1.1% 46.7% 4.1% 6.6% 8.9% 2.7% 12.6% 2.9% 0.6% 38.4% December 31, 2016 AAA AA+, AA, AA- A+, A, A- BBB+, BBB, BBB- BB+ or lower Fair Value 2.0% $ 2,648,556 100.0% % of Corporate bonds portfolio 6.2% 7.5% 25.9% 9.0% 40.5% 5.8% 5.1% % of Corporate bonds portfolio 8.0% 8.4% 24.5% 9.6% 38.6% 6.3% 4.6% ($ in thousands) 0.6% $ —% —% 0.8% —% 0.1% 0.5% 165,197 197,932 685,105 238,075 1,072,813 151,259 138,175 ($ in thousands) 2.4% $ —% 0.3% 2.1% 0.2% 0.6% 0.7% 213,904 223,984 657,717 256,449 1,035,759 170,030 124,497 (1) Ratings as assigned by S&P, or equivalent At December 31, 2017, the Company’s ten largest corporate holdings, all of which are U.S. dollar denominated and 69.6% of which are in the Financial Institutions sector, as carried at fair value and as a percentage of all fixed income securities, were as follows: 76 6.3% $ 2,682,340 100.0% December 31, 2017 % of Holdings Based on Fair Value of All Fixed Income Securities Fair Value ($ in thousands) Australia and New Zealand Banking Group, 3.70% Due 11/16/2025 $ Schlumberger Holdings Corporation, 4.00% Due 12/21/2025 Morgan Stanley, 4.00% Due 7/23/2025 JP Morgan Chase & Co, 3.90% Due 7/15/2025 Gilead Sciences Inc, 3.65% Due 3/1/2026 Vale Overseas Ltd, 4.375% Due 1/11/2022 BNP Paribas, 5.00% Due 1/15/2021 Brookfield Asset Management Inc, 4.00%, Due 1/15/2025 The Allstate Corporation, 3.28%, Due 12/15/2026 Rabobank Nederland Utrec, 3.875% Due 2/8/2022 Total (1) Ratings as assigned by S&P, or equivalent 26,272 26,270 26,177 20,966 20,748 20,680 20,531 20,526 20,302 20,063 $ 222,535 Rating(1) AA- AA- BBB+ A- A BBB- A A- A- A+ 0.5% 0.5% 0.5% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 0.4% 4.3% At December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, we hold the following non-U.S. dollar denominated securities: December 31, ($ in thousands) Non-U.S. dollar denominated corporate bonds Non-U.S. government and supranational bonds Total non-U.S. dollar denominated AFS securities 2017 2016 Fair Value % of Total Fair Value % of Total $ $ 434,963 30,899 465,862 93.4% $ 345,646 6.6% 28,980 100.0% $ 374,626 92.3% 7.7% 100.0% At December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, these non-U.S. securities are invested in the following currencies: December 31, ($ in thousands) Euro British Pound Australian Dollar Canadian Dollar All other 2017 2016 Fair Value % of Total Fair Value % of Total $ 398,680 85.6% $ 315,768 43,252 14,182 5,254 4,494 9.3% 3.0% 1.1% 1.0% 39,154 10,089 3,360 6,255 84.3% 10.5% 2.7% 0.9% 1.6% Total non-U.S. dollar denominated AFS securities $ 465,862 100.0% $ 374,626 100.0% The net increase in non-U.S. dollar denominated fixed maturities is primarily due to purchases made during the year ended December 31, 2017. At December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, all of the Company's non-U.S. government and supranational issuers were rated A+ or higher by S&P. For our non-U.S. dollar denominated corporate bonds, the following table summarizes the composition of the fair value of our fixed maturity investments at the dates indicated by ratings: 77 Ratings(1) at December 31, 2017 2016 ($ in thousands) AAA AA+, AA, AA- A+, A, A- BBB+, BBB, BBB- BB+ or lower Fair Value % of Total Fair Value % of Total $ 37,719 35,686 176,657 184,901 — 8.7% $ 8.2% 40.6% 42.5% —% 31,704 30,535 161,845 114,456 7,106 9.2% 8.8% 46.8% 33.1% 2.1% Total non-U.S. dollar denominated corporate bonds $ 434,963 100.0% $ 345,646 100.0% (1) Ratings as assigned by S&P, or equivalent The Company does not employ any credit default protection against any of the fixed maturities held in non-U.S. dollar denominated currencies at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Other Balance Sheet Changes The following table summarizes the Company's other material balance sheet changes at December 31, 2017 and 2016: December 31, 2017 2016 Change Change Reinsurance balances receivable, net $ 345,043 $ 410,166 $ Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses Reserve for loss and LAE 117,611 3,547,248 99,936 2,896,496 ($ in thousands) (65,123) 17,675 650,752 % (15.9)% 17.7 % 22.5 % The reinsurance balances receivable decreased by 15.9% while the reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses increased by 17.7% and the reserve for loss and LAE increased by 22.5% as at December 31, 2017 compared to December 31, 2016. The lower amount of net reinsurance balances receivable as at December 31, 2017 was primarily due to higher amount of losses paid in both our operating segments which were offset against the reinsurance premium receivable. The gross premiums written during the year ended December 31, 2017 also declined by $15.3 million or 0.5% compared to the same period in 2016. The reserve for loss and LAE increased due to adverse prior year development of $321.5 million recognized during 2017 from both of our reporting segments and from our run-off business in the Other category as well as higher initial loss ratio pick in 2017 compared to 2016 in both of our reporting segments. The higher reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses as at December 31, 2017 compared to the prior year end was primarily due to the increase in reserve for loss and LAE combined with the adverse loss development discussed above. Capital Resources Capital resources consist of funds deployed or available to be deployed in support of our operations. Our total capital resources decreased by $228.6 million, or 13.3% at December 31, 2017, compared to December 31, 2016. The Company’s management believes its current sources of liquidity are adequate to meet its cash requirements for the next 12 months. The following table shows the movement in total capital resources at December 31, 2017 and 2016: December 31, 2017 2016 Change Change Preference shares Common shareholders' equity Total Maiden shareholders' equity Senior Notes - principal amount Total capital resources ($ in thousands) $ 465,000 $ 315,000 $ 767,174 1,232,174 262,500 1,045,797 1,360,797 362,500 $ 1,494,674 $ 1,723,297 $ 150,000 (278,623) (128,623) (100,000) (228,623) % 47.6 % (26.6)% (9.5)% (27.6)% (13.3)% The major factors contributing to the net decrease in capital resources were as follows: Maiden shareholders' equity Total Maiden shareholders' equity at December 31, 2017 decreased by $128.6 million, or 9.5%, compared to December 31, 2016 primarily due to: • net loss attributable to Maiden of $169.9 million. See "Results of Operations - Net Income" on page 60 for a discussion of the Company’s net loss for the year ended December 31, 2017; • dividends declared of $80.3 million related to the Company’s common and preferred shares; • shares repurchased of $25.7 million; and 78 • net decrease in AOCI of $1.6 million which arose due to: 1) decrease in cumulative translation adjustments of $44.2 million due to the effect of the appreciation of the euro and British pound relative to the original currencies on our non- U.S. dollar net liabilities (excluding non-U.S. dollar denominated AFS fixed maturities); and offset by 2) an increase in net unrealized gains on investment of $42.6 million which arose from the net decrease in our U.S. dollar denominated investment portfolio of $17.2 million relating to market price movements and an increase in our non-U.S. dollar denominated investment portfolio of $59.8 million, primarily due to the strengthening of the euro and British pound relative to the U.S. dollar during 2017. These decreases were offset by: • issuance of new preference shares with net proceeds of $144.9 million after issuance cost of $5.1 million; and • net increase resulting from other share based transactions of $4.0 million. On February 21, 2017, the Company's Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to $100.0 million of the Company's common shares from time to time at market prices. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company repurchased a total of 3,667,134 common shares at an average price of $6.84 per share under its share repurchase authorization. At December 31, 2017, the Company has a remaining authorization of $74.9 million for share repurchases. Please refer to "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 13. Shareholders' Equity" included under Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this Form 10-K for a discussion of the equity instruments issued by the Company at December 31, 2017 and 2016. Senior Notes On June 27, 2017, we fully redeemed all of the 2012 Senior Notes using a portion of the proceeds from the Preference Shares - Series D issuance. The 2012 Senior Notes were redeemed at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of $100.0 million plus accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount being redeemed up to, but not including, the redemption date. As a result, the Company accelerated the amortization of the remaining 2012 Senior Note issuance cost of $2.8 million. Please see related discussion in "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 7. Long Term Debt" and "Note 13. Shareholders' Equity" included under Item 8 "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" of this Form 10-K. There were no further changes in the Company’s Senior Notes at December 31, 2017 compared to December 31, 2016 and the Company did not enter into any short-term borrowing arrangements during the year ended December 31, 2017. We have, and expect to continue, to fund a portion of our capital requirements through issuances of senior securities, including secured and unsecured debt securities, or issuances of common or preference shares. For flexibility, we have a current universal shelf registration statement that allows for the public offering and sale of our debt securities, common shares, preference shares and warrants to purchase such securities. The issuance of debt or equity securities will depend on future market conditions, funding needs and other factors and there can be no assurance that any such issuance will occur or be successful. Financial Strength Ratings The Company's principal operating subsidiaries are rated A (Excellent) with a stable outlook by A.M. Best and has remained unchanged throughout the reporting period. The rating of A (Excellent) is the third highest of sixteen rating levels. On November 17, 2017, S&P lowered its long-term issuer credit and financial strength ratings on our principal operating subsidiaries to 'BBB' from 'BBB+' (Good). S&P also lowered our long-term issuer credit and senior debt ratings to 'BB+' from 'BBB-'. Subsequently, we requested that S&P withdraw its ratings of the Company. The outlook was negative at the time of withdrawal. Our withdrawal of the S&P rating did not have a material impact on opportunities in the subsequent months and there has not been a noticeable reduction in current underwriting opportunities. Aggregate Contractual Obligations In the normal course of business, the Company is a party to a variety of contractual obligations as summarized below. These contractual obligations are considered by the Company when assessing its liquidity requirements and the Company is confident in its ability to meet all of its obligations. The Company’s aggregate contractual obligations at December 31, 2017 are as follows: December 31, 2017 Contractual Obligations Operating lease obligations(1) Reinsurance purchase commitments(2) Senior notes (including interest payments)(3) Reserve for loss and LAE(4) Other investments - unfunded commitments(5) Total Payment Due by Period Total Less than 1 Year 1 – 3 Years 3 – 5 Years More than 5 Years ($ in thousands) $ 5,139 $ 1,490 $ 2,211 $ 1,438 $ 1,305 776,562 1,305 19,107 — 38,212 3,547,248 1,167,866 1,208,250 306 — 306 — 38,212 524,362 — — — 681,031 646,770 — $ 4,330,560 $ 1,189,768 $ 1,248,979 $ 564,012 $ 1,327,801 (1) The Company leases office space, an apartment, equipment and vehicles under operating leases expiring in various years through 2022. 79 (2) We purchase retrocessional protection for our reinsurance lines of business. The minimum and deposit premiums are contractually due in advance on a quarterly basis. (3) For further details on the terms of our Senior notes, refer to "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 7. Long-Term Debt included under Item 8 "Financial Statement and Supplementary Data". (4) The amounts included for reserve for loss and LAE reflect the estimated timing of expected loss payments on known claims and anticipated future claims at December 31, 2017. Both the amount and timing of cash flows are uncertain and do not have contractual payout terms. For a discussion of these uncertainties, please refer to "Critical Accounting Policies — Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses" section included under Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. (5) We have unfunded investment commitments related to our investments in limited partnerships, which are callable by our investment managers. Due to the inherent uncertainty in the process of estimating the timing of these payments, there is a risk that the amounts paid in any period will differ significantly from those disclosed. Total estimated obligations will be funded by existing cash and investments. Currency and Foreign Exchange We conduct business in a variety of foreign (non-U.S.) currencies, the principal exposures being the euro, the British pound, the Australian dollar, the Canadian dollar and the Swedish krona. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are exposed to changes in currency exchange rates. Our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar, and exchange rate fluctuations relative to the U.S. dollar may materially impact our results and financial position. Our principal exposure to foreign currency risk is our obligation to settle claims in foreign currencies. In addition, in order to minimize this risk, we maintain and expect to continue to maintain a portion of our investment portfolio in investments denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. We may employ various strategies (including hedging) to manage our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk. To the extent that these exposures are not fully hedged or the hedges are ineffective, our results of operations or equity may be adversely effected. At December 31, 2017, no such hedges or hedging strategies were in force or had been entered into. We measure monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at period end exchange rates, with the resulting foreign exchange gains and losses recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Revenues and expenses in foreign currencies are converted at average exchange rates during the period. The effect of the translation adjustments for foreign operations is included in AOCI. Net foreign exchange losses amounted to $14.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to net foreign exchange gains of $13.4 million and $7.4 million during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Effects of Inflation The anticipated effects of inflation are considered explicitly in the pricing of the insured exposures, which are used as the initial estimates of reserves for loss and LAE. In addition, inflation is also implicitly accounted for in subsequent estimates of loss and LAE reserves, as the expected rate of emergence is in part predicated upon the historical levels of inflation that impact ultimate claim costs. To the extent inflation causes these costs, particularly medical treatments and litigation costs, to vary from the assumptions made in the pricing or reserving estimates, the Company will be required to change the reserve for loss and LAE with a corresponding change in its earnings in the period in which the variance is identified. The actual effects of inflation on the results of operations of the Company cannot be accurately known until claims are ultimately settled. 80 Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements At December 31, 2017, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined by Item 303(a) (4) of Regulation S-K. Recent Accounting Pronouncements Refer to "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies" included under Item 8 "Financial Statement and Supplementary Data", of this Form 10-K for a discussion on recently issued accounting pronouncements not yet adopted. 81 Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Market risk is the risk that we will incur losses in our investments due to adverse changes in market rates and prices. Market risk is directly influenced by the volatility and liquidity in the market in which the related underlying assets are invested. We believe that we are principally exposed to three types of market risk: changes in interest rates, changes in credit quality of issuers of investment securities and reinsurers and changes in foreign exchange rates. Interest Rate Risk Interest rate risk is the risk that we may incur economic losses due to adverse changes in interest rates. The primary market risk to the investment portfolio is interest rate risk associated with investments in fixed maturity securities. Fluctuations in interest rates have a direct impact on the market valuation of these securities. At December 31, 2017, we had AFS fixed maturity securities with a fair value of $4.0 billion that are subject to interest rate risk. The table below summarizes the interest rate risk associated with our fixed maturity securities by illustrating the sensitivity of the fair value and carrying value of our fixed maturity securities at December 31, 2017 to selected hypothetical changes in interest rates, and the associated impact on our shareholders’ equity. Temporary changes in the fair value of our fixed maturity securities that are held as AFS do impact the carrying value of these securities and are reported in our shareholders’ equity as a component of AOCI. The selected scenarios in the table below are not predictions of future events, but rather are intended to illustrate the effect such events may have on the fair value of our AFS fixed maturity securities and on our shareholders’ equity at December 31, 2017: Hypothetical Change in Interest Rates 200 basis point increase 100 basis point increase No change 100 basis point decrease 200 basis point decrease Fair Value Estimated Change in Fair Value ($ in thousands) $ 3,695,968 $ (348,402) 3,864,420 4,044,370 4,235,523 4,440,865 (179,950) — 191,153 396,495 Hypothetical % (Decrease) Increase in Shareholders’ Equity (28.3)% (14.6)% — % 15.5 % 32.2 % The interest rate sensitivity on the $168.0 million loan to related party means that a change in interest rates would impact our earnings and cash flows but would not affect the carrying value of the loan, which is carried at cost. Effective December 18, 2017, the loan carries an interest rate equivalent to the Federal Funds Effective Rate plus 200 basis points per annum. Therefore, an increase of 100 and 200 basis points in the Federal Funds Effective Rate would increase our earnings and cash flows by $1.7 million and $3.4 million, respectively, on an annual basis. Counterparty Credit Risk The concentrations of the Company’s counterparty credit risk exposures have not changed materially compared to December 31, 2016. The Company has exposure to credit risk primarily as a holder of fixed income securities. The Company controls this exposure by emphasizing investment grade credit quality in the fixed income securities it purchases. The table below summarizes the credit ratings by major rating category of the Company's fixed maturity investments at December 31, 2017 and 2016: December 31, Ratings(1) AA+ or better AA, AA-, A+, A, A- BBB+, BBB, BBB- BB+ or lower 2017 2016 45.4% 31.5% 22.1% 1.0% 41.3% 33.2% 22.0% 3.5% 100.0% 100.0% (1) Ratings as assigned by S&P, or equivalent The Company believes this high quality concentration reduces its exposure to credit risk on fixed income investments to an acceptable level. At December 31, 2017, the Company is not exposed to any significant credit concentration risk on its investments, excluding securities issued by the U.S. government and agencies which are rated AA+ (please see "Liquidity and Capital Resources - Investments" in Item 7 of Part II of this Annual Report on Form 10-K), with the largest corporate issuer and the top 10 corporate issuers accounting for only 0.5% and 4.3% of the Company’s total fixed income securities, respectively. 82 The Company is subject to the credit risk of its cedants in the event of their insolvency or their failure to honor the value of the funds held balances due to the Company for any other reason. However, the Company’s credit risk in some jurisdictions is mitigated by a mandatory right of offset of amounts payable by the Company to a cedant against amounts due to the Company. In certain other jurisdictions, the Company is able to mitigate this risk, depending on the nature of the funds held arrangements, to the extent that the Company has the contractual ability to offset any shortfall in the payment of the funds held balances with amounts owed by the Company to cedants for losses payable and other amounts contractually due. Funds held balances for which the Company receives an investment return based upon either the results of a pool of assets held by the cedant or the investment return earned by the cedant on its investment portfolio are exposed to an additional layer of credit risk. The Company has exposure to credit risk, as it relates to its business written through brokers if any, if the Company’s brokers are unable to fulfill their contractual obligations with respect to payments to the Company. In addition, in some jurisdictions, if the broker fails to make payments to the insured under the Company’s policy, the Company might remain liable to the insured for the deficiency. The Company’s exposure to such credit risk is somewhat mitigated in certain jurisdictions by contractual terms. Please see "Business and Risk Factors" in Item 1 and 1A of Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, respectively, for detailed information on three brokers that accounted for approximately 31.9% of the Company’s gross premiums written in our Diversified Reinsurance segment for the year ended December 31, 2017. The Company has exposure to credit risk as it relates to its reinsurance balances receivable and reinsurance recoverable on paid and unpaid losses. We are subject to the credit risk that AII and/or AmTrust will fail to perform their obligations to pay interest on and repay principal of amounts loaned to AII pursuant to its loan agreement with Maiden Bermuda, and to reimburse Maiden Bermuda for any assets or other collateral of Maiden that AmTrust’s U.S. insurance company subsidiaries apply or retain, and income on those assets. Reinsurance balances receivable from the Company’s clients at December 31, 2017 were $345.0 million, including balances both currently due and accrued. The Company believes that credit risk related to these balances is mitigated by several factors, including but not limited to, credit checks performed as part of the underwriting process and monitoring of aged receivable balances. In addition, as the vast majority of its reinsurance agreements permit the Company the right to offset reinsurance balances receivable from clients against losses payable to them, the Company believes that the credit risk in this area is substantially reduced. Provisions are made for amounts considered potentially uncollectible. There was no allowance for uncollectible reinsurance balances receivable at December 31, 2017. The Company requires its reinsurers to have adequate financial strength. The Company evaluates the financial condition of its reinsurers and monitors its concentration of credit risk on an ongoing basis. Provisions are made for amounts considered potentially uncollectible. The balance of reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses was $117.6 million at December 31, 2017 compared to $99.9 million at December 31, 2016. At December 31, 2017, $40.0 million or 34.0% of the total reinsurance recoverable is receivable from one reinsurer which has a credit rating of A+ (2016 - $54.8 million or 54.8% and with a credit rating of A+). Furthermore, at December 31, 2017, $45.8 million or 39.0% (2016 - $23.8 million or 23.8%) of these reinsurance recoverables relate to reinsurance claims from Superstorm Sandy. The table below summarizes the A.M. Best credit ratings of the Company's reinsurance counterparties at December 31, 2017 and 2016: December 31, A or better B++ or worse Foreign Currency Risk 2017 2016 98.6% 1.4% 100.0% 97.2% 2.8% 100.0% The Company is generally able to match foreign currency denominated assets against its net reinsurance liabilities both by currency and duration to protect the Company against foreign exchange and interest rate risks. However, a natural offset does not exist for all currencies. For the year ended December 31, 2017 and as at December 31, 2017, 7.5% of our net premiums written and 9.3% of our reserve for loss and LAE were transacted in euro, respectively. We may employ various strategies to manage our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk. To the extent that these exposures are not fully hedged or the hedges are ineffective, our results of operations or equity may be reduced by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates and could materially adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. At December 31, 2017, no hedging instruments have been entered into. Our principal foreign currency exposure is to the euro and British pound, however, assuming all other variables remain constant and disregarding any tax effects, a strengthening (weakening) of the U.S. dollar exchange rate of 10% or 20% relative to the non-U.S. currencies held by the Company would result in a decrease (increase) in the Company's net assets of $2.0 million and $4.0 million, respectively. 83 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. See our Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto and required financial statement schedules commencing on pages F-1 through F-68 and S-1 through S-7 below. Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. None. Item 9A. Controls and Procedures. Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures In connection with the preparation of this Report, our management has performed an evaluation, with the participation of our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) at December 31, 2017. Based on their evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that, at December 31, 2017, our Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective. Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act and for the assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. As defined by the SEC, internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and dispositions of our assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of the consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In connection with the preparation of our annual consolidated financial statements, management has undertaken an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO") 2013. Management’s assessment included an evaluation of the design of our internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of those controls. Based on this evaluation, management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, have concluded that our internal control over financial reporting is effective as of December 31, 2017 based on those criteria. The Company's independent auditors have issued an audit opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017. This report appears below. Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting No changes were made in our internal controls over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d) – 15(f), during the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. 84 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Maiden Holdings, Ltd. Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Maiden Holdings, Ltd. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO. We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, of the Company and our report dated March 1, 2018, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. Basis for Opinion The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. /s/ Deloitte Ltd. Hamilton, Bermuda March 1, 2018 85 Item 9B. Other Information. None. Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance. PART III The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the information responsive thereto in the sections in the Proxy Statement for our Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on May 8, 2018 (the "Proxy Statement") captioned "Election of Directors", "Executive Officers", "Audit Committee", "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" and "Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee". We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for all employees. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available free of charge on our website at www.maiden.bm and is available in print to any shareholder who requests it. We intend to disclose any amendments to this code by posting such information on our website, and disclose any waivers of this code applicable to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller and other executive officers who perform similar functions through such means or by filing a Form 8-K. Item 11. Executive Compensation. The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the information responsive thereto in the sections in the Proxy Statement captioned "Compensation Discussion and Analysis", "Director Compensation for 2017", "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation" and "Compensation Committee Report". Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters. The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the information responsive thereto in the sections in the Proxy Statement captioned "Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners", "Equity Compensation Plan Information" and "Security Ownership of Management". Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence. The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the information responsive thereto in the sections in the Proxy Statement captioned "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions", "Audit Committee", "Board Independence", "Compensation Committee" and "Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee". Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services. The information required by this item is incorporated by reference from the information responsive thereto in the section in the Proxy Statement captioned "Appointment of Independent Auditors of Maiden Holdings, Ltd.". Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules. (a) Financial statements and schedules PART IV Financial statements and schedules listed in the accompanying index to our Consolidated Financial Statements starting on page F-1 are filed as part of this Form 10-K, and are included in Item 8. "Financial Statement and Supplementary Data". All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable, and therefore have been omitted. (b) Exhibits The exhibits listed in the Exhibit Index starting on page E-1 following the signature page are filed herewith, which Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference. Item 16. Form 10-K Summary. None. 86 Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in Pembroke, Bermuda on March 1, 2018. SIGNATURES MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. By: /s/ Arturo M. Raschbaum Name: Arturo M. Raschbaum Title: President and Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Signature Title /s/ Arturo M. Raschbaum President and Chief Executive Officer Date March 1, 2018 Arturo M. Raschbaum (Principal Executive Officer) /s/ Karen L. Schmitt Chief Financial Officer Karen L. Schmitt /s/ Michael J. Tait Michael J. Tait (Principal Financial Officer) Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) /s/ Barry D. Zyskind Chairman Barry D. Zyskind /s/ Raymond M. Neff Director Raymond M. Neff /s/ Simcha G. Lyons Director Simcha G. Lyons /s/ Yehuda L. Neuberger Director Yehuda L. Neuberger /s/ Steven H. Nigro Director Steven H. Nigro March 1, 2018 March 1, 2018 March 1, 2018 March 1, 2018 March 1, 2018 March 1, 2018 March 1, 2018 87 This page intentionally left blank EXHIBIT INDEX Description Memorandum of Association (as amended) Bye-Laws Form of Common Share Certificate Registration Rights Agreement by and between Maiden Holdings, Ltd. and Friedman, Billings, Ramsey & Co., Inc., dated as of July 3, 2007 Form of Indenture for Debt Securities by and among Maiden Holdings North America, Ltd., Maiden Holdings, Ltd., as guarantor, and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee Second Supplemental Indenture, dated March 27, 2012, by and among Maiden Holdings North America, Ltd., Maiden Holdings, Ltd., as guarantor, and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee Form of 8.000% Notes due 2042 (included in Exhibit 4.4) Certificate of Designations of 8.25% Non-Cumulative Preference Shares, Series A, adopted on August 7, 2012 Form of stock certificate evidencing 8.25% Series A Preference Share (included in Exhibit 4.6) Third Supplemental Indenture, dated November 25, 2013, by and among Maiden Holdings North America, Ltd., Maiden Holdings, Ltd., as guarantor, and Wilmington Trust Company, as trustee Form of 7.75% Notes due 2043 (included in Exhibit 4.8) Certificate of Designations of 7.125% Non-Cumulative Preference Shares, Series C, adopted on November 4, 2015 Form of stock certificate evidencing 7.125% Non-Cumulative Preference Shares, Series C (included in Exhibit 4.10) Form of Indenture for Debt Securities by and between Maiden Holdings, Ltd., and Wilmington Trust National Association, as trustee First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 14, 2016, by and between Maiden Holdings, Ltd., as guarantor, and Wilmington Trust National Association, as trustee Certificate of Designations of 6.700% Non-Cumulative Preference Shares, Series D, adopted on May 2, 2017 Form of stock certificate evidencing 6.700% Non-Cumulative Preference Shares, Series D (included in Exhibit 4.14) Exhibit No. 3.1 3.2 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 4.7 4.8 4.9 4.10 4.11 4.12 4.13 4.14 4.15 10.1* Amended and Restated Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 2007 Share Incentive Plan as of July 26, 2011 10.2* 10.3* 10.4* 10.5* 10.6 10.7 10.8 10.9 Form of Share Option Agreement for Employee Recipients of Options under Amended and Restated 2007 Share Incentive Plan Form of Share Option Agreement for Non-Employee Recipients of Options under Amended and Restated 2007 Share Incentive Plan Form of Performance-Based Restricted Share Unit Agreement for Employee Recipients of Restricted Share Units under the Amended and Restated 2007 Share Incentive Plan Form of Employment Agreement by and between Maiden and Arturo M. Raschbaum, Karen L. Schmitt, Patrick J. Haveron, Thomas Highet and Lawrence F. Metz, dated as of November 1, 2011 Master Agreement by and between Maiden Holdings, Ltd. and AmTrust Financial Services, Inc., dated as of July 3, 2007 Amendment No. 1 to the Master Agreement by and between Maiden Holdings, Ltd. and AmTrust Financial Services, Inc., dated as of September 17, 2007 Amended and Restated Quota Share Reinsurance Agreement by and between Maiden Insurance Company Ltd. and AmTrust International Insurance, Ltd. and dated as of June 1, 2008 Loan Agreement by and between AmTrust International Insurance, Ltd. and Maiden Insurance Company Ltd., dated as of November 16, 2007 10.10 Amendment No. 1 to the Loan Agreement by and between AmTrust International Insurance, Ltd. and Maiden Insurance Company Ltd., dated as of February 15, 2008 E-1 Reference (1) (2) (2) (2) (3) (4) (4) (5) (5) (6) (6) (7) (7) (8) (8) (9) (9) (10) (2) (2) (10) (11) (2) (2) (12) (13) (13) 10.11 Asset Management Agreement by and between AII Insurance Management Limited and Maiden Insurance Company Ltd., dated as of July 3, 2007 10.12 10.13 10.14 10.15 10.16 10.17 10.18 10.19 10.20 10.21 10.22 10.23 10.24 10.25 10.26 10.27 10.28 10.29 10.30 10.31 21.1 23.1 23.2 First Amendment to Asset Management Agreement by and between AII Insurance Management Limited, Maiden Insurance Company Ltd., Maiden Holdings, Ltd., and Maiden Holdings North America, Ltd., dated as of November 3, 2008 Second Amendment to Asset Management Agreement by and between AII Insurance Management Limited, Maiden Insurance Company Ltd., Maiden Holdings, Ltd., Maiden Holdings North America, Ltd. and Maiden Reinsurance Company, dated as of December 23, 2008 Third Amendment to Asset Management Agreement by and between AII Insurance Management Limited, Maiden Insurance Company Ltd., Maiden Holdings, Ltd., Maiden Holdings North America, Ltd., Maiden Reinsurance Company and Maiden Specialty Insurance Company dated as of September 1, 2009 Asset Management Agreement by and between AII Insurance Management Limited, Maiden Insurance Company Ltd., Maiden Holdings, Ltd., Maiden Holdings North America, Ltd., Maiden Reinsurance Company and Maiden Specialty Insurance Company dated as of August 6, 2010 Asset Management Agreement by and between AII Insurance Management Limited and Maiden Life Försäkrings AB dated as of October 11, 2013 Reinsurance Brokerage Agreement by and between Maiden Insurance Company Ltd. and AII Reinsurance Broker Ltd., dated as of July 3, 2007 Brokerage Services Agreement between Maiden Insurance Company Ltd. and IGI Intermediaries Limited, dated as of January 1, 2008 Reinsurance Brokerage Services Agreement between Maiden Insurance Company Ltd. and IGI Intermediaries, Inc., dated as of April 3, 2008 Endorsement No. 1 to the Amended and Restated Quota Share Reinsurance Agreement by and between Maiden Insurance Company Ltd. and AmTrust International Insurance, Ltd. dated as of July 26, 2011 Endorsement No. 2 to the Quota Share Reinsurance Contract by and between Maiden Insurance Company Ltd. and AmTrust International Insurance, Ltd. dated as of March 7, 2013 Endorsement No. 3 to the Amended and Restated Quota Share Agreement between AmTrust International Insurance, Ltd. and Maiden Reinsurance Ltd. dated as of September 30, 2015 Quota Share Reinsurance Contract by and between Maiden Insurance Company Ltd. and AmTrust Europe Limited and/or AmTrust International Underwriters Limited dated as of April 1, 2011 Endorsement No. 1 to the Quota Share Reinsurance Contract by and between Maiden Insurance Company Ltd. and AmTrust Europe Limited and/or AmTrust International Underwriters Limited dated as of July 26, 2011 Endorsement No. 2 to the Quota Share Reinsurance Contract by and between Maiden Insurance Company Ltd. and AmTrust Europe Limited and/or AmTrust International Underwriters Limited dated as of August 7, 2012 Endorsement No. 3 to the Amended and Restated Quota Share Reinsurance Contract by and between Maiden Reinsurance Ltd. and AmTrust Europe Limited and/or AmTrust International Underwriters Limited dated as of March 1, 2015 Endorsement No. 4 to the Amended and Restated Quota Share Reinsurance Contract by and between Maiden Reinsurance Ltd. and AmTrust Europe Limited and/or AmTrust International Underwriters Limited dated as of July 1, 2016 Personal and Commercial Automobile Quota Share Reinsurance Agreement by and between Maiden Insurance Company Ltd. and Integon National Insurance Company, dated as March 1, 2010 Addendum No. 1 to Personal and Commercial Automobile Quota Share Reinsurance Agreement by and between Maiden Insurance Company Ltd. and Integon National Insurance Company and others, dated as October 1, 2012 Termination of Personal and Commercial Automobile Quota Share Reinsurance Agreement by and between Maiden Insurance Company Ltd. and Integon National Insurance Company and others, dated as August 1, 2013 Form of Indemnification Agreement between Maiden Holdings, Ltd. and its officers and directors Subsidiaries of the registrant Consent of Deloitte Ltd. Consent of BDO USA, LLP E-2 (2) (14) (14) (14) (14) (15) (2) (13) (16) (10) (17) (18) (10) (10) (19) † (20) (14) (16) (15) (13) † † † 31.1 31.2 32.1 32.2 Section 302 Certification of CEO Section 302 Certification of CFO Section 906 Certification of CEO Section 906 Certification of CFO The following financial information from Maiden Holdings, Ltd.'s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017, formatted in XBRL (eXtensive Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2017 and 2016; (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015; (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015; (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015; (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015; (vi) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements; and (vii) Financial Statement Schedules. 101.1 † † † † † (1) Incorporated by reference to the filing of such exhibit with the registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the SEC on May 18, 2010 (File No. 333-166934). (2) Incorporated by reference to the filing of such exhibit with the registrant's Registration Statement on S-1 initially filed with the SEC on September 17, 2007, subsequently amended and declared effective May 6, 2008 (File No. 333-146137). (3) Incorporated by reference to the filing of such exhibit with the registrant's Registration Statement on S-3 filed with the SEC on February 7, 2011 (File Nos. 333-172107 and 333-172107-01). (4) Incorporated by reference to the filing of such exhibit with the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 27, 2012 (File No. 001-34042). (5) Incorporated by reference to the filing of such exhibit with the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on August 22, 2012 (File No. 001-34042). (6) Incorporated by reference to the filing of such exhibit with the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 25, 2013 (File No. 001-34042). (7) Incorporated by reference to the filing of such exhibit with the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 25, 2015 (File No. 001-34042). (8) Incorporated by reference to the filing of such exhibit with the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 14, 2016 (File No. 001-34042). (9) Incorporated by reference to the filing of such exhibit with the registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 15, 2017 (File No. 001-34042). (10) Incorporated by reference to the filing of such exhibit with the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 filed with the SEC on August 8, 2011 (File No. 001-34042). (11) Incorporated by reference to the filing of such exhibit with the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 filed with the SEC on March 13, 2012 (File No. 001-34042). (12) Incorporated by reference to the filing of such exhibit with the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 filed with the SEC on March 31, 2009 (File No. 001-34042). (13) Incorporated by reference to the filing of such exhibit with Amendment No. 2 to the registrant's Registration Statement on S-1 filed with the SEC on March 28, 2008 (No. 333-146137). (14) Incorporated by reference to the filing of such exhibit with the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 filed with the SEC on March 14, 2011 (File No. 001-34042). (15) Incorporated by reference to the filing of such exhibit with the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 filed with the SEC on March 4, 2014 (File No. 001-34042). (16) Incorporated by reference to the filing of such exhibit with Amendment No. 3 to the registrant's Registration Statement on S-1 filed with the SEC on April 24, 2008 (No. 333-146137). (17) Incorporated by reference to the filing of such exhibit with the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 filed with the SEC on March 11, 2013 (File No. 001-34042). (18) Incorporated by reference to the filing of such exhibit with the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2016 filed with the SEC on August 9, 2016 (No. 001-34042). (19) Incorporated by reference to the filing of such exhibit with the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2012 filed with the SEC on August 9, 2012 (File No. 001-34042). (20) Incorporated by reference to the filing of such exhibit with the registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2016 filed with the SEC on November 8, 2016 (No. 001-34042). † Filed herewith. * Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement E-3 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. Index to Consolidated Financial Statements and Related Notes Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 1 — Organization Note 2 — Significant Accounting Policies Note 3 — Segment Information Note 4 — Investments Note 5 — Fair Value Measurements Note 6 — Goodwill and Intangible Assets Note 7 — Long-Term Debt Note 8 — Reinsurance Note 9 — Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses Note 10 — Related Party Transactions Note 11 — Commitments, Contingencies and Concentrations Note 12 — Earnings Per Common Share Note 13 — Shareholders’ Equity Note 14 — Share Compensation and Pension Plans Note 15 — Statutory Requirements and Dividend Restrictions Note 16 — Taxation Note 17 — Subsequent Events Note 18— Condensed Quarterly Financial Data — Unaudited Supplementary Information Summary of Investments — Other than Investments in Related Parties (Schedule I) Condensed Financial Information of Registrant (Schedule II) Supplementary Insurance Information (Schedule III) Supplementary Reinsurance Information (Schedule IV) Supplementary Insurance Information Concerning Property and Casualty Insurance Operations (Schedule VI) Page F-2 F-4 F-5 F-6 F-7 F-8 F-9 F-9 F-17 F-22 F-27 F-29 F-31 F-32 F-33 F-53 F-56 F-58 F-59 F-62 F-65 F-66 F-68 F-68 S-1 S-2 S-5 S-6 S-7 F-1 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Maiden Holdings, Ltd. Opinion on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Maiden Holdings, Ltd. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2017, the related consolidated statement of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows, for the year ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes and the schedules listed in the Index at Item 15 for the year ended December 31, 2017 (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 1, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Basis for Opinion These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. /s/ Deloitte Ltd. Hamilton, Bermuda March 1, 2018 We have served as the Company's auditor since 2017. F-2 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Maiden Holdings, Ltd. Hamilton, Bermuda We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Maiden Holdings, Ltd. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2016 and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2016. In connection with our audits of the financial statements, we have also audited the financial statement schedules listed in the accompanying index. These financial statements and schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedules based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements and schedules. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Maiden Holdings, Ltd. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2016 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. /s/ BDO USA, LLP New York, New York March 6, 2017 F-3 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS As of December 31, 2017 and 2016 (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) ASSETS Investments: Fixed maturities, available-for-sale, at fair value (amortized cost 2017: $4,027,993; 2016: $4,005,642) Fixed maturities, held-to-maturity, at amortized cost (fair value 2017: $1,125,626; 2016: $766,135) Other investments, at fair value (cost 2017: $5,219; 2016: $10,057) Total investments Cash and cash equivalents Restricted cash and cash equivalents Accrued investment income Reinsurance balances receivable, net (includes $50,415 and $132,056 from related parties in 2017 and 2016, respectively) Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses (includes $2,204 and $5,085 from related parties in 2017 and 2016, respectively) Loan to related party Deferred commission and other acquisition expenses (includes $359,964 and $339,172 from related parties in 2017 and 2016, respectively) Goodwill and intangible assets, net Other assets Total assets Reserve for loss and loss adjustment expenses (includes $2,298,822 and $1,776,784 from related parties in 2017 and 2016, respectively) Unearned premiums (includes $1,179,285 and $1,152,484 from related parties in 2017 and LIABILITIES 2016, respectively) Accrued expenses and other liabilities Senior notes - principal amount Less unamortized issuance costs Senior notes, net Total liabilities Commitments and Contingencies EQUITY Preference shares Common shares ($0.01 par value; 87,730,054 and 87,321,012 shares issued in 2017 and 2016, respectively; 82,974,895 and 86,271,109 shares outstanding in 2017 and 2016, respectively) Additional paid-in capital Accumulated other comprehensive income Retained earnings Treasury shares, at cost (4,755,159 and 1,049,903 shares in 2017 and 2016, respectively) Total Maiden shareholders’ equity Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries Total equity Total liabilities and equity 2017 2016 $ 4,044,370 $ 3,971,666 1,097,801 6,600 5,148,771 67,919 123,584 34,993 752,212 13,060 4,736,938 45,747 103,788 36,517 345,043 410,166 117,611 167,975 439,597 75,583 123,113 6,644,189 $ 99,936 167,975 424,605 77,715 148,912 6,252,299 3,547,248 $ 2,896,496 1,477,038 132,795 262,500 8,018 254,482 5,411,563 1,475,506 167,736 362,500 11,091 351,409 4,891,147 465,000 315,000 877 748,113 13,354 35,472 (30,642) 1,232,174 452 1,232,626 6,644,189 $ 873 749,256 14,997 285,662 (4,991) 1,360,797 355 1,361,152 6,252,299 $ $ $ See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements F-4 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) For the Year Ended December 31, Revenues Gross premiums written Net premiums written Change in unearned premiums Net premiums earned Other insurance revenue Net investment income Net realized gains on investment Total other-than-temporary impairment losses Total revenues Expenses Net loss and loss adjustment expenses Commission and other acquisition expenses General and administrative expenses Interest and amortization expenses Accelerated amortization of senior note issuance cost Amortization of intangible assets Foreign exchange and other losses (gains) Total expenses (Loss) income before income taxes Less: income tax (benefit) expense Net (loss) income Add: net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests Net (loss) income attributable to Maiden Dividends on preference shares Net (loss) income attributable to Maiden common shareholders Basic (loss) earnings per share attributable to Maiden common shareholders Diluted (loss) earnings per share attributable to Maiden common shareholders Dividends declared per common share 2017 2016 2015 $ $ 2,816,051 2,761,988 $ $ 2,831,348 2,654,952 $ $ (29,209) 2,732,779 (86,802) 2,568,150 9,802 166,345 12,222 — 10,817 145,892 6,774 — 2,921,148 2,731,633 2,662,825 2,514,116 (85,047) 2,429,069 11,512 131,092 2,498 (1,060) 2,573,111 2,160,011 1,819,906 1,633,570 820,758 773,664 724,197 70,560 23,260 2,809 2,132 14,921 3,094,451 (173,303) (3,558) (169,745) (151) (169,896) (29,156) (199,052) $ (2.32) $ (2.32) $ 0.60 $ 66,984 28,173 2,345 2,461 (11,612) 2,681,921 49,712 1,574 48,138 842 48,980 (33,756) 15,224 0.20 0.19 0.57 $ $ $ $ 64,872 29,063 — 2,840 (7,753) 2,446,789 126,322 2,038 124,284 192 124,476 (24,337) 100,139 1.36 1.31 0.53 $ $ $ $ Weighted average number of common shares - basic 85,678,232 77,534,860 73,478,544 Adjusted weighted average number of common shares and assumed conversions - diluted 85,678,232 78,686,943 85,638,235 See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. F-5  MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (In thousands of U.S. dollars) For the Year Ended December 31, Net (loss) income Other comprehensive (loss) income 2017 2016 2015 $ (169,745) $ 48,138 $ 124,284 Net unrealized holdings gains (losses) on available-for-sale fixed maturities arising during the period Adjustment for reclassification of net realized (gains) losses recognized in net (loss) income Foreign currency translation adjustment Other comprehensive (loss) income, before tax Income tax benefit related to components of other comprehensive income Other comprehensive (loss) income, after tax Comprehensive (loss) income Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests Other comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests 44,414 32,788 (132,511) (1,816) (44,187) (1,589) 7 (1,582) (171,327) (151) (61) (212) 576 5,373 38,737 32 38,769 86,907 842 (5) 837 (263) 13,566 (119,208) 83 (119,125) 5,159 192 65 257 Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Maiden $ (171,539) $ 87,744 $ 5,416 See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. F-6 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (In thousands of U.S. dollars) For the Year Ended December 31, Preference shares – Series A, B, C and D Beginning balance Issuance of Preference Shares – Series D Mandatory conversion of Preference Shares – Series B Issuance of Preference Shares – Series C Ending balance Common shares Beginning balance Shares issued on mandatory conversion of Preference Shares – Series B Exercise of options and issuance of common shares Ending balance Additional paid-in capital Beginning balance Exercise of options and issuance of common shares Share-based compensation expense Issuance costs of Preference Shares Mandatory conversion of Preference Shares – Series B Others Ending balance Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) Beginning balance Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investment Foreign currency translation adjustment Ending balance Retained earnings Beginning balance Net (loss) income attributable to Maiden Dividends on preference shares Dividends on common shares Ending balance Treasury shares Beginning balance Shares repurchased Ending balance Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries Beginning balance Acquisition of subsidiary Acquisition of minority interest in subsidiaries Dividend paid to noncontrolling interest Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests Foreign currency translation adjustment Ending balance Total equity 2017 2016 2015 $ $ 315,000 150,000 — — 465,000 $ 480,000 — (165,000) — 315,000 315,000 — — 165,000 480,000 873 — 4 877 749,256 1,077 2,938 (5,058) — (100) 748,113 14,997 42,605 (44,248) 13,354 285,662 (169,896) (29,156) (51,138) 35,472 (4,991) (25,651) (30,642) 747 121 5 873 579,178 1,926 3,414 — 164,879 (141) 749,256 (23,767) 33,396 5,368 14,997 316,184 48,980 (33,756) (45,746) 285,662 (4,521) (470) (4,991) 739 — 8 747 578,445 3,310 2,938 (5,515) — — 579,178 95,293 (132,691) 13,631 (23,767) 255,084 124,476 (24,337) (39,039) 316,184 (3,867) (654) (4,521) 355 — (115) — 151 61 452 1,232,626 $ 1,278 14 (69) (31) (842) 5 355 1,361,152 $ 472 1,378 — (315) (192) (65) 1,278 1,349,099 $ See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. F-7 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (In thousands of U.S. dollars) For the Year Ended December 31, Cash flows from operating activities Net (loss) income 2017 2016 2015 $ (169,745) $ 48,138 $ 124,284 Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation, amortization and share-based compensation Net realized gains on investment Net impairment losses recognized in earnings Foreign exchange losses (gains) Changes in assets – (increase) decrease: Reinsurance balances receivable, net Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses Accrued investment income Deferred commission and other acquisition expenses Other assets Changes in liabilities – increase (decrease): Reserve for loss and loss adjustment expenses Unearned premiums Accrued expenses and other liabilities Net cash provided by operating activities Cash flows from investing activities: Purchases of investments: Purchases of fixed-maturities – available-for-sale Purchases of other investments Sale of investments: Proceeds from sales of fixed-maturities – available-for-sale Proceeds from maturities, paydowns and calls of fixed maturities – available-for-sale Proceeds from maturities and calls of fixed maturities – held-to-maturity Proceeds from sale and redemption of other investments (Increase) decrease in restricted cash and cash equivalents Other, net Net cash used in investing activities Cash flows from financing activities: Preference shares, net of issuance costs 2016 Senior notes, net of issuance costs Redemption of 2012 Senior Notes Redemption of 2011 Senior Notes Issuance of common shares Repurchase of common shares Dividends paid – Maiden common shareholders Dividends paid – preference shares Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities Effect of exchange rate changes on foreign currency cash Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period Cash and cash equivalents, end of period Supplemental information on cash flows Interest paid Taxes paid 11,825 (12,222) — 14,921 71,458 (17,419) 2,171 (13,138) 21,821 595,063 (6,529) (39,672) 458,534 20,303 (6,774) — (11,612) (33,116) (29,308) (4,354) (29,405) (37,182) 407,267 125,775 20,400 470,132 9,716 (2,498) 1,060 (7,753) 127,506 (20,721) (5,086) (26,546) (76,599) 304,254 154,642 52,039 634,298 (1,374,462) (1,372,049) (1,463,556) (986) (172) (217) 548,744 420,428 39,653 11,702 (19,038) (4,935) (378,894) 144,942 — (100,000) — 1,081 (25,651) (51,634) (29,156) (60,418) 2,950 22,172 45,747 67,919 23,106 555 $ $ 129,306 657,819 6,172 1,481 138,861 (622) (439,204) (143) 106,285 — (107,500) 1,931 (470) (43,127) (33,756) (76,780) 1,958 (43,894) 89,641 45,747 27,897 494 $ $ 129,152 541,081 — 456 34,980 7,426 (750,678) 159,628 — — — 3,318 (654) (38,204) (24,337) 99,751 (1,849) (18,478) 108,119 89,641 28,687 789 $ $ See accompanying notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. F-8 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 1. Organization Maiden Holdings, Ltd. (sometimes referred to as "Maiden Holdings" or "Parent Company") is a Bermuda-based holding company formed in June 2007, primarily focused on serving the needs of regional and specialty insurers in the United States and Europe by providing innovative reinsurance solutions designed to support their capital needs. Together with its subsidiaries (collectively referred to as the "Company", "We" or "Maiden"), Maiden specializes in reinsurance solutions that optimize financing by providing coverage within the more predictable and actuarially credible lower layers of coverage and/or reinsure risks that are believed to be lower hazard, more predictable and generally not susceptible to catastrophe claims. Our tailored solutions include a variety of value added services focused on helping our clients grow and prosper. We provide reinsurance through our wholly owned subsidiaries, Maiden Reinsurance Ltd. ("Maiden Bermuda") and Maiden Reinsurance North America, Inc. ("Maiden US") and have operations in Bermuda and the United States, respectively. Maiden Bermuda does not underwrite any direct insurance business. Internationally, we provide reinsurance-related services through Maiden Global Holdings, Ltd. ("Maiden Global") and its subsidiaries. Maiden Global primarily focuses on providing branded auto and credit life insurance products through its insurer partners to retail clients in the European Union and other global markets, which also produce reinsurance programs which are underwritten by Maiden Bermuda. Certain international credit life business is also written on a primary basis by Maiden Life Försäkrings AB ("Maiden LF"), a wholly owned subsidiary of Maiden Holdings, as part of Maiden Global’s service offerings. 2. Significant Accounting Policies Basis of Reporting and Consolidation — These Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP") and include the accounts of Maiden Holdings and all of its subsidiaries. These Consolidated Financial Statements reflect all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the period and all such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated. Certain prior year comparatives have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. The effect of these reclassifications had no impact on previously reported shareholders' equity or net income. Estimates — The preparation of U.S. GAAP Consolidated Financial Statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported and disclosed amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. The significant estimates include, but are not limited to, reserve for loss and loss adjustment expenses ("loss and LAE"); recoverability of deferred commission and other acquisition expenses; determination of impairment of goodwill and other intangible assets; valuation of financial instruments; and determination of other-than-temporary impairment ("OTTI") of investments. During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company increased the reserve for loss and LAE primarily in both our Diversified Reinsurance and AmTrust Reinsurance segments. The Company recorded unfavorable reserve development which reduced both its consolidated net income and net income attributable to Maiden for the year ended December 31, 2017 by approximately $170,960 or $1.99 per basic and diluted common share. Investments — The Company currently classifies its fixed maturity investments as either available-for-sale ("AFS") or held- to-maturity ("HTM"). The AFS portfolio is reported at fair value. The HTM portfolio includes securities for which we have the ability and intent to hold to maturity or redemption. The HTM portfolio is reported at amortized cost. When a security is transferred from AFS to HTM, the fair value at the time of transfer, adjusted for subsequent amortization, becomes the security's amortized cost. The fair value of fixed maturity investments is generally determined from quotations received from nationally recognized pricing services ("Pricing Service"), or when such prices are not available, by reference to broker or underwriter bid indications. Short-term investments comprise securities due to mature within one year of the date of purchase. The Company held no short- term investments as at December 31, 2017 and 2016. The Company's other investments comprise both quoted and unquoted investments. The Company's quoted equity investment's fair value is based on a quoted market price from a Pricing Service, reflecting the closing price quoted for the final trading day of the period. The quoted equity investment was sold in the third quarter of 2017. The Company accounts for its unquoted other investments at fair value in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 944, "Financial Services - Insurance" ("ASC 944"). Unquoted other investments primarily comprise of investments in limited partnerships, which are reported at fair value based on the financial information received from the fund managers and other information available to management, and investments in start-up insurance entities, which are reported at fair value using recent private market transactions. F-9 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued) Unrealized gains or losses on fixed maturities and other investments are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income ("AOCI"). The net unrealized holding gains of securities transferred from AFS to HTM at the designation date continue to be reported in the carrying value of the HTM securities and is amortized through Other Comprehensive Income over the remaining life of the securities using the effective yield method in a manner consistent with the amortization of any premium or discount. Purchases and sales of investments are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains or losses on sales of investments are determined based on the first in first out cost method. Net investment income is recognized when earned and includes interest and dividend income together with amortization of market premiums and discounts using the effective yield method and is net of investment management fees. For our U.S. government agency mortgage-backed securities ("Agency MBS") and any other holdings for which there is a prepayment risk, prepayment assumptions are evaluated and revised as necessary. Any adjustments required due to the change in effective yields and maturities are recognized on a prospective basis through yield adjustments. A security is potentially impaired when its fair value is below its amortized cost. On a quarterly basis, we review all impaired securities to determine if the impairment is OTTI. OTTI assessments are inherently judgmental, especially where securities have experienced severe declines in fair value in a short period. Our review process begins with a quantitative analysis to identify securities to be further evaluated for potential OTTI. For all identified securities, further fundamental analysis is performed that considers, but not limited to, the following quantitative and qualitative factors: • Historic and implied volatility of the security; • Length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than amortized cost; • Adverse conditions specifically related to the security or to specific conditions in an industry or geographic area; • Failure, if any, of the issuer of the security to make scheduled payments; and • Recoveries or additional declines in fair value subsequent to the balance sheet date. The Company recognizes OTTI in earnings for its impaired fixed maturity securities (i) for which the Company has the intent to sell the security or (ii) it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery and (iii) for those securities which have a credit loss. In assessing whether a credit loss exists, the Company compares the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected from the security with the amortized cost basis of the security. In instances in which a determination is made that an impairment exists but the Company does not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before the anticipated recovery of its remaining amortized cost basis, the impairment is separated into (i) the amount of the total impairment related to the credit loss and (ii) the amount of the total impairment related to all other factors. The amount of the total OTTI related to the credit loss is recognized in earnings. The amount of the total OTTI related to all other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income. In periods after the recognition of OTTI on the Company’s fixed maturity securities, the Company accounts for such securities as if they had been purchased on the measurement date of the OTTI at an amortized cost basis equal to the previous amortized cost basis less the OTTI recognized in earnings. For fixed maturity securities in which OTTI was recognized in earnings, the difference between the new amortized cost basis and the cash flows expected to be collected will be amortized into net investment income. As our investment portfolio is the largest component of our consolidated assets, OTTI on our fixed maturity securities could be material to our financial condition and results particularly during periods of dislocation in the financial markets. Fair Value Measurements — ASC Topic 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures" ("ASC 820") defines fair value as the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e. the "exit price") in an orderly transaction between open market participants at the measurement date. Additionally, ASC 820 establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. The hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows: • Level 1 — Valuations based on unadjusted quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Valuation adjustments and block discounts are not applied to Level 1 instruments. Since valuations are based on quoted prices that are readily and regularly available in an active market, valuation of these products does not entail a significant degree of judgment. Examples of assets and liabilities utilizing Level 1 inputs include: exchange-traded equity securities and U.S. Treasury bonds; • Level 2 — Valuations based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets, or valuations based on models where the significant inputs are observable (e.g. interest rates, yield curves, prepayment speeds, default rates, loss severities, etc.) or can be corroborated by observable market data. Examples of assets and liabilities utilizing Level 2 inputs include: U.S. government-sponsored agency securities; non-U.S. government and supranational obligations; commercial mortgage-backed securities ("CMBS"); collateralized loan obligations ("CLO"); corporate and municipal bonds; and F-10 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued) • Level 3 — Valuations based on models where significant inputs are not observable. The unobservable inputs reflect our own assumptions about assumptions that market participants would use. Examples of assets and liabilities utilizing Level 3 inputs include: investments in start-up insurance entities. The availability of observable inputs can vary from financial instrument to financial instrument and is affected by a wide variety of factors, including, for example, the type of financial instrument, whether the financial instrument is new and not yet established in the marketplace, and other characteristics particular to the transaction. To the extent that valuation is based on models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires significantly more judgment. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by management in determining fair value is greatest for instruments categorized in Level 3. We use prices and inputs that are current at the measurement date. In periods of market dislocation, the observability of prices and inputs may be reduced for many instruments. This condition could cause an instrument to be reclassified between levels. For investments that have quoted market prices in active markets, the Company uses the quoted market prices as fair value and includes these prices in the amounts disclosed in the Level 1 hierarchy. The Company receives the quoted market prices from a third party nationally recognized provider, the Pricing Service. When quoted market prices are unavailable, the Company utilizes the Pricing Service to determine an estimate of fair value. The fair value estimates are included in the Level 2 hierarchy. The Company will challenge any prices for its investments which are considered not to be representation of fair value. If quoted market prices and an estimate from the Pricing Service are unavailable, the Company produces an estimate of fair value based on dealer quotations for recent activity in positions with the same or similar characteristics to that being valued or through consensus pricing of a pricing service. The Company determines whether the fair value estimate is in the Level 2 or Level 3 hierarchy depending on the level of observable inputs available when estimating the fair value. The Company bases its estimates of fair values for assets on the bid price as it represents what a third party market participant would be willing to pay in an orderly transaction. Cash and Cash Equivalents — The Company maintains its cash accounts in several banks and brokerage institutions. Cash equivalents consist of investments in money market funds and short-term investments with an original maturity of 90 days or less and are stated at cost, which approximates fair value. Restricted cash and cash equivalents are separately reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Accordingly, changes in restricted cash and cash equivalents are reported as an investing activity in our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The Company maintains certain cash and investments in trust accounts to be used primarily as collateral for unearned premiums and loss and LAE reserves owed to insureds. The Company is required to maintain minimum balances in these accounts based on pre-determined formulas. See "Note 4. (e) Investments" for additional details. Premiums and Related Expenses — For pro-rata contracts and excess-of-loss contracts where no deposit or minimum premium is specified in the contract, written premium is recognized based on estimates of ultimate premiums provided by the ceding companies. Initial estimates of written premium are recognized in the period in which the underlying risks are incepted. Subsequent adjustments, based on reports of actual premium by the ceding companies, or revisions in estimates, are recorded in the period in which they are determined. Reinsurance premiums assumed are generally earned on a pro-rata basis over the terms of the underlying policies or reinsurance contracts. Contracts and policies written on a "losses occurring" basis cover claims that may occur during the term of the contract or policy, which is typically 12 months. Accordingly, the premium is earned evenly over the term. Contracts which are written on a "risks attaching" basis cover claims which attach to the underlying insurance policies written during the terms of such contracts. Premiums earned on such contracts usually extend beyond the original term of the reinsurance contract, typically resulting in recognition of premiums earned over a 24-month period. Reinsurance premiums on specialty risk and extended warranty are earned based on the estimated program coverage period. These estimates are based on the expected distribution of coverage periods by contract at inception, because a single contract may contain multiple coverage period options, and these estimates are revised based on the actual coverage period selected by the original insured. Unearned premiums represent the portion of premiums written which is applicable to the unexpired term of the contract or policy in force. These premiums can be subject to estimates based upon information received from ceding companies and any subsequent differences arising on such estimates are recorded in the period in which they are determined. The unexpired portion of reinsurance purchased by the Company (retrocession or reinsurance premiums ceded) is included in other assets and amortized over the contract period in proportion to the amount of insurance protection provided. The ultimate amount of premiums, including adjustments, is recognized as premiums ceded, and amortized over the applicable contract period to which they apply. Losses recoverable are recorded as an asset called reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses. Premiums earned are reported net of reinsurance in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Assumed and ceded reinsurance contracts that lack a significant transfer of risk are treated as deposits. No deposit contracts are held as at December 31, 2017 and 2016. Acquisition expenses represent the costs of writing business that vary with, and are primarily related to, the production of the business. Policy and contract acquisition expenses, including assumed commissions and other direct operating expenses that are related to successful contracts are deferred and recognized as expense as related premiums are earned. F-11 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued) Only certain expenses incurred in the successful acquisition of new and renewal insurance contracts are capitalized. Those expenses include incremental direct costs of contract acquisition that result directly from and are essential to the contract transaction and would not have been incurred had the contract transaction not occurred. All other acquisition-related expenses, such as costs incurred for soliciting business, administration, and unsuccessful acquisition or renewal efforts are charged to expense as incurred. Administrative expenses, including rent, depreciation, occupancy, equipment, and all other general overhead expenses are considered indirect and are expensed as incurred. The Company considers anticipated investment income in determining the recoverability of these costs and believes they are fully recoverable. A premium deficiency is recognized if the sum of anticipated losses and loss adjustment expenses, unamortized acquisition expenses and anticipated investment income exceed unearned premium. Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses Incurred — Loss and LAE represent the estimated ultimate net costs of all reported and unreported losses incurred through December 31. The reserve for loss and LAE is estimated using statistical analysis of actuarial data and is not discounted. Although considerable variability is inherent in the estimates of reserves for loss and LAE, management believes that the reserve for loss and LAE is adequate. In estimating reserves, the Company utilizes a variety of standard actuarial methods. The estimates are continually reviewed and adjusted as necessary as experience develops or new information becomes known. Such adjustments are included in current operations. Reinsurance — Reinsurance premiums and loss and LAE ceded to other companies are accounted for on a basis consistent with those used in accounting for original policies issued and pursuant to the terms of the reinsurance contracts. The Company records premiums earned and loss and LAE incurred and ceded to other companies as reduction of premium revenue and loss and LAE. The Company accounts for commissions allowed by reinsurers on business ceded as ceding commission, which is a reduction of acquisition costs and other underwriting expenses. The Company earns commissions on reinsurance premiums ceded in a manner consistent with the recognition of the earned premium on the underlying insurance policies, on a pro-rata basis over the terms of the policies reinsured. Reinsurance recoverable relate to the portion of reserves and paid loss and LAE that are ceded to other companies. The Company remains contingently liable for all loss payments in the event of failure to collect from reinsurers. Ceding Commissions on Reinsurance Transactions — Ceding commissions on reinsurance transactions are commissions the Company receives from ceding gross written premiums to third party reinsurers. The ceding commissions the Company receives cover a portion of its capitalized acquisition costs and a portion of other underwriting expenses. Ceding commissions received from reinsurance transactions that represent recovery of capitalized direct acquisition costs are recorded as a reduction of deferred acquisition costs and the net amount is charged to expense in proportion to net premium revenue recognized. Ceding commissions received from reinsurance transactions that represent the recovery of other underwriting expenses are recognized in the statement of income over the insurance contract period in proportion to the insurance protection provided and classified as a reduction of acquisition costs and other underwriting expenses. Ceding commissions received, but not yet earned, that represent the recovery of other underwriting expenses are classified as a component of accrued expenses and other current liabilities. The Company allocates earned ceding commissions to its segments based on each segment’s proportionate share of total acquisition costs and other underwriting expenses recognized during the period. Debt Obligations and Deferred Debt Issuance Costs — Costs incurred in issuing debt are capitalized and amortized over the life of the debt. The amortization of these costs is included in interest and amortization expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The unamortized amount of these costs is presented as a deduction from the related liability in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. Goodwill and Intangible Assets — A purchase price that is in excess of the fair value of the net assets acquired arising from a business combination is recorded as goodwill, and is not amortized. Other intangible assets with a finite life are amortized over the estimated useful life of the asset. Other intangible assets with an indefinite useful life are not amortized. Goodwill and other indefinite life intangible assets are tested for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. Finite life intangible assets are reviewed for indicators of impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable, and tested for impairment if appropriate. For purposes of the annual impairment evaluation, goodwill is assigned to the applicable reporting unit of the acquired entities giving rise to the goodwill. We have established October 1 as the date for performing the annual impairment tests. If goodwill or other intangible assets are impaired, they are written down to their estimated fair values with a corresponding loss reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Noncontrolling Interests — The Company accounts for its noncontrolling interests in accordance with ASC Topic 810 "Consolidations", and presents such noncontrolling shareholders' interest in the equity section of the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests is presented separately in the Consolidated Statements of Income. F-12 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued) Income Taxes — The Company accounts for income taxes using ASC Topic 740 "Income Taxes" for its subsidiaries operating in taxable jurisdictions. Deferred income taxes reflect the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and amounts used for income tax purposes. A valuation allowance is recorded if it is more likely than not that some or all of a deferred tax asset may not be realized. The Company considers future taxable income and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the need for a valuation allowance. In the event the Company determines that it will not be able to realize all or part of its deferred income tax assets in the future, an adjustment to the deferred income tax assets would be charged to income in the period in which such determination is made. In addition, if the Company subsequently assesses that the valuation allowance is no longer needed, a benefit would be recorded to income in the period in which such determination is made. U.S. GAAP allows for the recognition of tax benefits of uncertain tax positions only where the position is more likely than not to be sustained assuming examination by tax authorities. A liability is established for any tax benefit claimed in a tax return in excess of this threshold. Income tax related interest and penalties would be included as income tax expense. The Company has not recorded or accrued any interest or penalties during the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. Share-Based Compensation Expense — The Company is authorized to issue restricted share awards and units, performance based restricted share units ("PB-RSUs"), share options and other equity-based awards to its employees and directors. The Company recognizes the compensation expense for share options, restricted share and share unit grants, based on the fair value of the award on the date of grant, over the vesting period, which is the requisite service period. Forfeitures are accounted for when they occur. The estimated fair value of the grant will be amortized ratably over its vesting period as a charge to compensation expense (a component of general and administrative expenses) and an increase to additional paid in capital in Consolidated Shareholders’ Equity. The estimated fair value of the PB-RSUs is recognized as a charge to compensation expense and an increase to additional paid in capital in Consolidated Shareholders’ Equity following certain criteria such as non-GAAP operating return on common equity, underwriting performance, revenue growth and operating expense being met during the specified performance period as well as based on the recommendation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. Forfeitures are accounted for when they occur. Earnings Per Share — Basic earnings per share are computed based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding and exclude any dilutive effects of options and restricted share units ("RSUs"). Dilutive earnings per share are computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period adjusted for the dilutive impact of share options, RSUs, PB-RSUs and the mandatory convertible preference shares using the if-converted method. On September 15, 2016, the Company's mandatory convertible preference shares - Series B were automatically converted into the Company's common shares. The two-class method is used to determine earnings per share based on dividends declared on common shares and participating securities (i.e. distributed earnings) and participation rights of participating securities in any undistributed earnings. Each unvested restricted share granted by the Company to certain senior leaders is considered a participating security and the Company uses the two-class method to calculate its net income attributable to Maiden common shareholders per common share – basic and diluted. However, any undistributed losses are not allocated to the participating securities. Treasury Shares — Treasury shares are common shares repurchased by the Company and not subsequently cancelled. These shares are recorded at cost and result in a reduction of our shareholders’ equity in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Foreign Currency Transactions — The functional currency of the Company and many of its subsidiaries is the U.S. dollar. For these companies, we translate monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at year-end exchange rates, with the resulting foreign exchange gains and losses recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income. Revenues and expenses in foreign currencies are converted at average exchange rates during the year. Monetary assets and liabilities include cash and cash equivalents, reinsurance balances receivable, reserve for loss and LAE and accrued expenses and other liabilities. Accounts that are classified as non-monetary, such as deferred commission and other acquisition expenses and unearned premiums, are not revalued. Assets and liabilities of subsidiaries and divisions, whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, are translated at year-end exchange rates. Revenues and expenses of these entities are translated at average exchange rates during the year. The effects of the translation adjustments for foreign entities are included in AOCI. The amount of cumulative translation adjustment at December 31, 2017 was $8,535 (2016 - $35,713). F-13 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued) Recently Adopted Accounting Standards Updates Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update ("ASU") 2016-09 guidance that outlines changes for certain aspects of share-based payments to employees, such as accounting for forfeitures, which applies to the Company. Under the new guidance, the entities can elect to either estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest or account for forfeitures when they occur. The guidance is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for all entities, in any annual or interim period for which financial statements have not been issued or made available for issuance, but all of the guidance must be adopted within the same period. Based on the Company's history, forfeitures have never been material and so the Company has elected to account for forfeitures as they occur. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. Simplified Accounting for Goodwill Impairment In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04 guidance that simplifies the accounting for goodwill impairment for all entities by requiring impairment charges to be based on Step 1 of the two-step impairment test under ASC 350 Intangibles - Goodwill and Other. Under the new guidance, if the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the Company will record an impairment charge based on that difference. The impairment charge will be limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The standard eliminates the requirement to calculate goodwill impairment under Step 2, which calculates any impairment charge by comparing the implied fair value of goodwill with its carrying amount. This ASU does not change the guidance on completing Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test. The standard has tiered effective dates, starting in 2020 for calendar public business entities that meet the definition of an SEC filer. Early adoption is permitted for annual and interim goodwill impairment testing dates after January 1, 2017. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. Recently Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted Revenue Recognition In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update ("ASU") 2014-09 guidance that supersedes most existing revenue recognition guidance. The standard excludes from its scope the accounting for insurance contracts, leases, financial instruments, and certain other agreements that are governed under other GAAP guidance, but could affect the revenue recognition for certain of our other insurance revenue activities. In August 2015, the FASB delayed the effective date by one year through the issuance of ASU 2015-14, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date". This guidance is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Our analysis of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2017 indicates that substantially all of our revenues are from sources not within the scope of the standard. As substantially all of our revenue sources are not within the scope of the standard, the adoption of the standard will not have a material effect on our reported consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-08 to amend the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. Current GAAP excludes certain callable debt securities from consideration of early repayment of principal even if the holder is certain that the call will be exercised. As a result, upon the exercise of a call on a callable debt security held at a premium, the unamortized premium is recorded as a loss in earnings. The amendments in ASU 2017-08 affect all entities that hold investments in callable debt securities that have an amortized cost basis in excess of the amount that is repayable by the issuer at the earliest call date. The amendments shorten the amortization period for certain callable debt securities held at a premium and require the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. The amendments do not require an accounting change for securities held at a discount; the discount continues to be amortized to maturity. For public business entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. An entity should apply the amendments on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. Additionally, in the period of adoption, an entity should provide disclosures about a change in accounting principle. The Company holds a number of securities with callable features on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and this includes certain securities that have been purchased at a premium that is being amortized to the associated security's maturity date. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance on the Company's results of operations, financial position or liquidity at the date of adoption; however, it is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. F-14 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued) Scope of Modification Accounting In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09 to amend the guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share- based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. An entity should account for the effects of a modification unless all the following are met: (1) The fair value (or calculated value or intrinsic value, if such an alternative measurement method is used) of the modified award is the same as the fair value (or calculated value or intrinsic value, if such an alternative measurement method is used) of the original award immediately before the original award is modified. If the modification does not affect any of the inputs to the valuation technique that the entity uses to value the award, the entity is not required to estimate the value immediately before and after the modification; (2) The vesting conditions of the modified award are the same as the vesting conditions of the original award immediately before the original award is modified; and (3) The classification of the modified award as an equity instrument or a liability instrument is the same as the classification of the original award immediately before the original award is modified. The current disclosure requirements in Topic 718 apply regardless of whether an entity is required to apply modification accounting under the amendments in this Update. The amendments in this Update are effective for all entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period, for (1) public business entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued and (2) all other entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been made available for issuance. The amendments in this Update should be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. The Company currently has a number of share based payment awards as disclosed in Note 14. Share Compensation and Pension Plans of this Form 10-K, however, we do not anticipate any modifications to the terms or conditions at this time. The impact of this guidance on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements will be evaluated once ASU-2017-09 is adopted and when the Company makes any modification to any of its current shared based payment awards. Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01 that will change how entities measure certain equity investments and present changes in the fair value of financial liabilities measured under the fair value option that are attributable to their own credit. The new guidance also changes certain disclosure requirements and other aspects of current U.S. GAAP. It does not change the guidance for classifying and measuring investments in debt securities and loans. Under the new guidance, entities will have to measure many equity investments at fair value and recognize any changes in fair value in net income unless the investments qualify for the new practicability exception. This includes investments in partnerships, unincorporated joint ventures and limited liability companies that do not result in consolidation and are not accounted for under the equity method. Entities will no longer be able to recognize unrealized holding gains and losses on equity securities they classify today as AFS in AOCI. They also will no longer be able to use the cost method of accounting for equity securities that do not have readily determinable fair values. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The impact on the Company is expected to be immaterial. Accounting for Leases In February 2016, the FASB issued final ASC 842 guidance that requires lessees to put most leases on their balance sheets but recognize expenses on their income statement in a manner similar to today's accounting. The guidance also eliminates today's real- estate-specific provisions for all entities. All entities classify leases to determine how to recognize lease-related revenue and expense. The U.S. GAAP standard is effective for public business entities and certain not-for-profit entities and employee benefit plans for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted for all entities. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this guidance; however, it is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. Accounting for Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13 guidance that changes the impairment model for most financial assets and certain other instruments that are not measured at fair value through net income. The standard will replace today's "incurred loss" approach with an "expected loss" model for instruments measured at amortized cost and require entities to record allowances for AFS debt securities rather than reduce the carrying amount, as they do today under the OTTI model. It also simplifies the accounting model for purchased credit-impaired debt securities and loans. Entities will apply the standard's provisions as a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. The guidance is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods therein. The Company is currently unable to quantify the impact of adopting this guidance. F-15 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 2. Significant Accounting Policies (continued) Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15 guidance to clarify how entities should classify certain cash receipts and cash payments on the statement of cash flows. The new guidance amends ASC 230 Statement of Cash Flows, a principles based requiring judgment to determine the appropriate classification of cash flow as operating, investing or financing activities which created diversity in how certain cash receipts and cash payments were classified. The new guidance clarifies that if a receipt or payment has aspects of more than one class of cash flows and cannot be separated, the classification will depend on the predominant source or use. While the new guidance attempts to clarify how the predominance principle should be applied, judgment will still be required. The guidance is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. Entities will have to apply the guidance retrospectively, but if it is impracticable to do so for an issue, the amendments related to that issue would be applied prospectively. The impact on the Company's results of operations, financial position or liquidity at the date of adoption of the updated guidance will be determined by the financial instruments held by the Company and the economic conditions at that time. Presentation of Restricted Cash in the Statement of Cash Flows In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18 guidance that require entities to show the changes in the total cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. As result, entities will no longer present transfers between cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. When cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents are presented in more than one line item on the balance sheet, the new guidance requires a reconciliation of the totals in the statement of cash flows to the related captions in the balance sheet. This reconciliation can be presented either on the face of the statement of cash flows or in the notes to the financial statements. The guidance is effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted, but an early adoption in an interim period must show adjustments as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial condition, results of operations and disclosures, other than the presentation of restricted cash and cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. The financial impact in the consolidated cash flows will depend on the actual amount of restricted cash and cash equivalents at the time of adoption. F-16 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 3. Segment Information The Company currently has two reportable segments: Diversified Reinsurance and AmTrust Reinsurance. Our Diversified Reinsurance segment consists of a portfolio of predominantly property and casualty reinsurance business focusing on regional and specialty property and casualty insurance companies located, primarily, in the U.S. and Europe. Our AmTrust Reinsurance segment includes all business ceded to Maiden Bermuda from AmTrust Financial Services, Inc. ("AmTrust"), primarily the AmTrust Quota Share and the European Hospital Liability Quota Share. In addition to our reportable segments, the results of operations of the former NGHC Quota Share segment and the remnants of the U.S. excess and surplus business have been included in the "Other" category. Please refer to "Note 10. Related Party Transactions" for additional information. The Company evaluates segment performance based on segment profit separately from the results of our investment portfolio. General and administrative expenses are allocated to the segments on an actual basis except salaries and benefits where management’s judgment is applied. The Company does not allocate general corporate expenses to the segments. In determining total assets by reportable segment, the Company identifies those assets that are attributable to a particular segment such as reinsurance balances receivable, reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses, deferred commission and other acquisition expenses, loans, goodwill and intangible assets, restricted cash and cash equivalents and investments and unearned reinsurance premiums ceded, funds withheld receivable and reinsurance recoverable on paid losses (presented as part of other assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet). All remaining assets are allocated to Corporate. The following tables summarize our reporting segment's underwriting results and the reconciliation of our reportable segments and Other category's underwriting results to our consolidated net income: Diversified Reinsurance 822,777 AmTrust Reinsurance $ 1,993,478 807,362 $ 1,954,856 823,365 $ 1,909,644 9,802 (650,916) (205,982) (35,817) (59,548) — (1,498,881) (614,777) (3,052) (207,066) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Other (204) (230) (230) — (10,214) 1 — (10,443) Total $ 2,816,051 $ 2,761,988 $ 2,732,779 9,802 (2,160,011) (820,758) (38,869) (277,057) For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 Gross premiums written Net premiums written Net premiums earned Other insurance revenue Net loss and LAE Commission and other acquisition expenses General and administrative expenses Underwriting loss Reconciliation to net loss Net investment income and realized gains on investment Interest and amortization expenses Accelerated amortization of senior note issuance cost Amortization of intangible assets Foreign exchange losses Other general and administrative expenses Income tax benefit Net loss 178,567 (23,260) (2,809) (2,132) (14,921) (31,691) 3,558 (169,745) $ 78.8% 29.9% 2.6% 32.5% 111.3% Net loss and LAE ratio(1) Commission and other acquisition expense ratio(2) General and administrative expense ratio(3) Expense ratio(4) Combined ratio(5) 78.1% 24.7% 4.3% 29.0% 78.4% 32.2% 0.2% 32.4% 107.1% 110.8% F-17 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) Diversified Reinsurance 824,341 AmTrust Reinsurance $ 2,006,646 766,119 $ 1,888,428 724,124 $ 1,843,621 10,817 (579,520) (188,506) (35,681) (68,766) — (1,225,830) (584,820) (2,896) 30,075 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Other 361 405 405 — (14,556) (338) — (14,489) Total $ 2,831,348 $ 2,654,952 $ 2,568,150 10,817 (1,819,906) (773,664) (38,577) (53,180) 3. Segment Information (continued) For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 Gross premiums written Net premiums written Net premiums earned Other insurance revenue Net loss and LAE Commission and other acquisition expenses General and administrative expenses Underwriting (loss) income Reconciliation to net income Net investment income and realized gains on investment Interest and amortization expenses Accelerated amortization of senior note issuance cost Amortization of intangible assets Foreign exchange and other gains, net Other general and administrative expenses Income tax expense Net income 152,666 (28,173) (2,345) (2,461) 11,612 (28,407) (1,574) 48,138 70.6% 30.0% 2.6% 32.6% 103.2% $ Net loss and LAE ratio(1) Commission and other acquisition expense ratio(2) General and administrative expense ratio(3) Expense ratio(4) Combined ratio(5) 78.9% 25.6% 4.9% 30.5% 109.4% 66.5% 31.7% 0.2% 31.9% 98.4% F-18 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) Diversified Reinsurance 776,852 AmTrust Reinsurance $ 1,885,974 734,781 $ 1,779,334 744,875 $ 1,684,191 11,512 (547,296) (196,292) (35,312) (22,513) — (1,074,072) (527,863) (3,016) 79,240 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Other Total $ 2,662,825 $ 2,514,116 $ 2,429,069 (1) 1 3 — (12,202) (42) — (12,241) 11,512 (1,633,570) (724,197) (38,328) 44,486 3. Segment Information (continued) For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 Gross premiums written Net premiums written Net premiums earned Other insurance revenue Net loss and LAE Commission and other acquisition expenses General and administrative expenses Underwriting (loss) income Reconciliation to net income Net investment income and realized gains on investment Net impairment losses recognized in earnings Interest and amortization expenses Amortization of intangible assets Foreign exchange gains Other general and administrative expenses Income tax expense Net income Net loss and LAE ratio (1) Commission and other acquisition expense ratio (2) General and administrative expense ratio (3) Expense ratio(4) Combined ratio(5) 72.3% 26.0% 4.7% 30.7% 103.0% 63.8% 31.3% 0.2% 31.5% 95.3% (1) Calculated by dividing the net loss and LAE by the sum of net premiums earned and other insurance revenue. (2) Calculated by dividing commission and other acquisition expenses by the sum of net premiums earned and other insurance revenue. (3) Calculated by dividing general and administrative expenses by the sum of net premiums earned and other insurance revenue. (4) Calculated by adding together the commission and other acquisition expense ratio and general and administrative expense ratio. (5) Calculated by adding together the net loss and LAE ratio and the expense ratio. F-19 133,590 (1,060) (29,063) (2,840) 7,753 (26,544) (2,038) 124,284 $ 66.9% 29.7% 2.7% 32.4% 99.3% MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 3. Segment Information (continued) The following tables summarize the financial position of our reportable segments including the reconciliation to our consolidated assets at December 31, 2017 and 2016: December 31, 2017 Reinsurance balances receivable, net Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses Deferred commission and other acquisition expenses Loan to related party Goodwill and intangible assets, net Restricted cash and cash equivalents and investments Other assets Total assets - reportable segments Corporate assets Total Assets December 31, 2016 Reinsurance balances receivable, net Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses Deferred commission and other acquisition expenses Loan to related party Goodwill and intangible assets, net Diversified Reinsurance AmTrust Reinsurance Total $ 294,775 $ 50,268 $ 345,043 44,628 79,633 — 75,583 22,831 359,964 167,975 — 67,459 439,597 167,975 75,583 1,250,736 3,576,184 4,826,920 27,554 81,385 108,939 1,772,909 4,258,607 6,031,516 — — 612,673 $ 1,772,909 $ 4,258,607 $ 6,644,189 Diversified Reinsurance AmTrust Reinsurance Total $ 281,073 $ 119,151 $ 400,224 54,299 85,432 — 77,715 32,933 339,173 167,975 — 87,232 424,605 167,975 77,715 Restricted cash and cash equivalents and investments 1,247,793 3,137,810 4,385,603 Other assets Total assets - reportable segments Corporate assets Total Assets 41,008 103,025 144,033 1,787,320 3,900,067 5,687,387 — — 564,912 $ 1,787,320 $ 3,900,067 $ 6,252,299 The following table shows an analysis of the Company’s gross and net premiums written and net premiums earned by geographic location for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. In case of business assumed from AmTrust, it is the location of the relevant AmTrust subsidiaries. For the Year Ended December 31, Gross premiums written – North America Gross premiums written – Other (predominantly Europe) Gross premiums written – Total Net premiums written – North America Net premiums written – Other (predominantly Europe) Net premiums written – Total Net premiums earned – North America Net premiums earned – Other (predominantly Europe) Net premiums earned – Total 2017 2016 2015 2,488,105 $ 2,442,483 $ 2,165,309 327,946 2,816,051 2,435,371 326,617 2,761,988 2,407,339 325,440 $ $ $ $ 388,865 2,831,348 2,280,232 374,720 2,654,952 2,184,184 383,966 $ $ $ $ 497,516 2,662,825 2,038,444 475,672 2,514,116 2,027,141 401,928 2,732,779 $ 2,568,150 $ 2,429,069 $ $ $ $ $ $ F-20 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 3. Segment Information (continued) The following tables set forth financial information relating to net premiums written by major line of business and reportable segment for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015: For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 Total % of Total Total % of Total Total % of Total Net premiums written Diversified Reinsurance Property Casualty Accident and Health International $ 155,925 5.6 % $ 141,353 5.3% $ 160,939 482,160 17.5 % 466,089 17.6% 435,625 86,743 82,534 3.1 % 3.0 % 80,004 78,673 3.0% 3.0% 64,102 74,115 Total Diversified Reinsurance 807,362 29.2 % 766,119 28.9% 734,781 AmTrust Reinsurance Small Commercial Business Specialty Program Specialty Risk and Extended Warranty 1,278,974 46.3 % 1,181,496 44.5% 1,057,968 350,113 325,769 12.7 % 11.8 % 344,677 362,255 13.0% 13.6% 332,416 388,950 Total AmTrust Reinsurance 1,954,856 70.8 % 1,888,428 71.1% 1,779,334 Other (230) — % 405 —% 1 6.4% 17.3% 2.6% 2.9% 29.2% 42.1% 13.2% 15.5% 70.8% —% $ 2,761,988 100.0 % $ 2,654,952 100.0% $ 2,514,116 100.0% The following tables set forth financial information relating to net premiums earned by major line of business and reportable segment for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015: For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 Total % of Total Total % of Total Total % of Total Net premiums earned Diversified Reinsurance Property Casualty Accident and Health International $ 157,466 5.8 % $ 136,629 5.3% $ 157,186 496,301 18.1 % 432,509 16.8% 449,000 86,571 83,027 3.2 % 3.0 % 74,204 80,782 2.9% 3.2% 55,672 83,017 Total Diversified Reinsurance 823,365 30.1 % 724,124 28.2% 744,875 AmTrust Reinsurance Small Commercial Business Specialty Program Specialty Risk and Extended Warranty 1,255,941 46.0 % 1,131,582 344,336 309,367 12.6 % 11.3 % 337,396 374,643 44.1% 13.1% 14.6% 984,333 290,209 409,649 Total AmTrust Reinsurance 1,909,644 69.9 % 1,843,621 71.8% 1,684,191 Other (230) — % 405 —% 3 6.5% 18.5% 2.3% 3.4% 30.7% 40.5% 11.9% 16.9% 69.3% —% $ 2,732,779 100.0 % $ 2,568,150 100.0% $ 2,429,069 100.0% F-21 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 4. Investments a) Fixed Maturities and Other Investments The original or amortized cost, estimated fair value and gross unrealized gains and losses of fixed maturities and other investments at December 31, 2017 and 2016, are as follows: December 31, 2017 AFS fixed maturities: U.S. treasury bonds U.S. agency bonds – mortgage-backed U.S. agency bonds – other Non-U.S. government and supranational bonds Asset-backed securities Corporate bonds Municipal bonds Total AFS fixed maturities HTM fixed maturities: Corporate bonds Municipal bonds Total HTM fixed maturities Other investments Total investments December 31, 2016 AFS fixed maturities: U.S. treasury bonds U.S. agency bonds – mortgage-backed U.S. agency bonds – other Non-U.S. government and supranational bonds Asset-backed securities Corporate bonds Municipal bonds Total AFS fixed maturities HTM fixed maturities: Corporate bonds Total HTM fixed maturities Other investments Total investments Original or amortized cost Gross unrealized gains Gross unrealized losses Fair value $ 60,711 $ 103 $ (13) $ 60,801 2,026,305 29,941 33,381 317,544 1,557,611 2,500 4,027,993 1,037,464 60,337 1,097,801 5,219 8,074 4 231 4,065 43,271 76 55,824 28,694 128 28,822 1,381 $ 5,131,013 $ 86,027 $ (19,765) (163) (1,736) (199) (17,571) — (39,447) (913) (84) (997) — (40,444) $ 2,014,614 29,782 31,876 321,410 1,583,311 2,576 4,044,370 1,065,245 60,381 1,125,626 6,600 5,176,596 Original or amortized cost Gross unrealized gains Gross unrealized losses Fair value $ 5,186 $ 238 $ (11) $ 5,413 1,720,436 12,867 18,082 35,158 217,232 1,947,347 62,201 4,005,642 752,212 752,212 10,057 20 73 3,713 30,951 2,897 50,759 16,370 16,370 3,003 $ 4,767,911 $ 70,132 $ (17,265) — (5,297) (69) (62,093) — (84,735) 1,716,038 18,102 29,934 220,876 1,916,205 65,098 3,971,666 (2,447) (2,447) — (87,182) $ 766,135 766,135 13,060 4,750,861 During 2017, we designated additional fixed maturities with a total fair value of $391,934 as HTM (2016 - $155,538, 2015 - $608,722) reflecting our intent to hold these securities to maturity. The net unrealized holding gain of $4,313 (2016 - $15,770, 2015 - $244) as at the designation date continues to be reported in the carrying value of the HTM securities and is amortized through other comprehensive income over the remaining life of the securities using the effective yield method in a manner consistent with the amortization of any premium or discount. F-22 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 4. Investments (continued) The contractual maturities of our fixed maturities are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. December 31, 2017 Maturity Due in one year or less Due after one year through five years Due after five years through ten years Due after ten years U.S. agency bonds – mortgage-backed Asset-backed securities Total fixed maturities AFS fixed maturities HTM fixed maturities Amortized cost Fair value Amortized cost Fair value $ 92,657 $ 91,054 $ 40,533 $ 578,427 987,819 25,241 1,684,144 2,026,305 317,544 582,583 1,009,652 25,057 1,708,346 2,014,614 321,410 333,003 724,265 — 40,503 342,141 742,982 — 1,097,801 1,125,626 — — — — $ 4,027,993 $ 4,044,370 $ 1,097,801 $ 1,125,626 The following tables summarize fixed maturities in an unrealized loss position and the aggregate fair value and gross unrealized loss by length of time the security has continuously been in an unrealized loss position: December 31, 2017 Fixed maturities U.S. treasury bonds U.S. agency bonds – mortgage-backed U.S. agency bonds – other Non–U.S. government and supranational bonds Asset-backed securities Corporate bonds Municipal bonds Total temporarily impaired fixed maturities Less than 12 Months 12 Months or More Total Fair value Unrealized losses Fair value Unrealized losses Fair value Unrealized losses $ — $ — $ 587 $ (13) $ 587 $ 842,000 19,816 12,825 68,703 247,341 39,492 (6,920) (163) (971) (150) (3,905) (84) 539,704 — 15,253 3,017 348,594 — (12,845) — 1,381,704 19,816 (765) (49) (14,579) — 28,078 71,720 595,935 39,492 (13) (19,765) (163) (1,736) (199) (18,484) (84) $ 1,230,177 $ (12,193) $ 907,155 $ (28,251) $ 2,137,332 $ (40,444) At December 31, 2017, there were approximately 244 securities in an unrealized loss position with a fair value of $2,137,332 and unrealized losses of $40,444. Of these securities, there were 100 securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or greater with a fair value of $907,155 and unrealized losses of $28,251. December 31, 2016 Fixed maturities U.S. treasury bonds U.S. agency bonds – mortgage-backed Non-U.S. government and supranational bonds Asset-backed securities Corporate bonds Total temporarily impaired fixed maturities Less than 12 Months 12 Months or More Total Fair value Unrealized losses Fair value Unrealized losses Fair value Unrealized losses $ 589 $ (11) $ — $ — $ 589 $ 997,943 (14,440) 47,969 (2,825) 1,045,912 3,169 30,589 642,599 (160) (69) (15,058) 25,236 — 357,954 (5,137) — (49,482) 28,405 30,589 1,000,553 (11) (17,265) (5,297) (69) (64,540) $ 1,674,889 $ (29,738) $ 431,159 $ (57,444) $ 2,106,048 $ (87,182) F-23 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 4. Investments (continued) At December 31, 2016, there were approximately 251 securities in an unrealized loss position with a fair value of $2,106,048 and unrealized losses of $87,182. Of these securities, there were 91 securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or greater with a fair value of $431,159 and unrealized losses of $57,444. OTTI The Company performs quarterly reviews of its fixed maturities in order to determine whether declines in fair value below the amortized cost basis were considered other-than-temporary in accordance with applicable guidance. At December 31, 2017, we have determined that the unrealized losses on fixed maturities were primarily due to interest rates rising as well as the impact of foreign exchange rate changes on certain foreign currency denominated AFS fixed maturities since their date of purchase. Because we do not intend to sell these securities and it is not more likely than not that we will be required to do so until a recovery of fair value to amortized cost, we currently believe it is probable that we will collect all amounts due according to their respective contractual terms. Therefore, we do not consider these fixed maturities to be other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2017. The Company has therefore recognized no OTTI through earnings for the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016. The Company recognized $1,060 of OTTI for the year ended December 31, 2015. The following summarizes the credit ratings of our fixed maturities: Ratings(1) at December 31, 2017 U.S. treasury bonds U.S. agency bonds AAA AA+, AA, AA- A+, A, A- BBB+, BBB, BBB- BB+ or lower Total fixed maturities Ratings(1) at December 31, 2016 U.S. treasury bonds U.S. agency bonds AAA AA+, AA, AA- A+, A, A- BBB+, BBB, BBB- BB+ or lower Total fixed maturities Amortized cost 60,711 $ Fair value $ 60,801 2,056,246 2,044,396 245,562 204,792 1,381,031 1,125,471 51,981 249,073 207,898 1,404,451 1,149,511 53,866 % of Total fair value 1.2% 39.6% 4.8% 4.0% 27.2% 22.2% 1.0% $ 5,125,794 $ 5,169,996 100.0% Amortized cost 5,186 $ $ Fair value 5,413 1,738,518 1,734,140 170,515 238,315 1,386,023 1,053,529 165,768 171,090 237,169 1,374,860 1,047,376 167,753 % of Total fair value 0.1% 36.6% 3.6% 5.0% 29.0% 22.2% 3.5% $ 4,757,854 $ 4,737,801 100.0% (1) Based on Standard & Poor’s ("S&P"), or equivalent, ratings b) Other Investments The table below shows our portfolio of other investments: December 31, 2017 2016 Investment in limited partnerships Investment in quoted equity Other Total other investments Fair value % of Total fair value Fair value % of Total fair value $ $ 5,100 — 1,500 6,600 77.3% $ —% 22.7% 5,474 6,586 1,000 100.0% $ 13,060 41.9% 50.4% 7.7% 100.0% The Company has a remaining unfunded commitment on its investment in limited partnerships of approximately $306 at December 31, 2017 (2016 - $463). F-24 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 4. Investments (continued) c) Net Investment Income Net investment income was derived from the following sources: For the Year Ended December 31, Fixed maturities Cash and cash equivalents Loan to related party Other Investment expenses Net investment income d) Realized Gains on Investment 2017 166,625 $ 2016 147,011 $ 2015 132,394 1,973 3,447 1,833 1,628 2,360 1,818 173,878 (7,533) 166,345 $ 152,817 (6,925) 145,892 $ 1,025 1,865 1,865 137,149 (6,057) 131,092 $ $ Realized gains or losses on the sale of investments are determined on the basis of the first in first out cost method. The following provides an analysis of net realized gains on investment included in the Consolidated Statements of Income: For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 AFS fixed maturities Other investments Net realized gains on investment For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 AFS fixed maturities Other investments Net realized gains on investment For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 AFS fixed maturities Other investments Net realized gains on investment Gross gains Gross losses Net $ $ $ $ $ $ 7,598 5,878 13,476 Gross gains 7,140 550 7,690 Gross gains 2,849 192 3,041 $ $ $ $ $ $ (1,254) $ — (1,254) $ 6,344 5,878 12,222 Gross losses Net (916) $ — (916) $ Gross losses Net (543) $ — (543) $ 6,224 550 6,774 2,306 192 2,498 Proceeds from sales of AFS fixed maturities were $548,744, $129,306 and $129,152 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Net unrealized gains (losses) were as follows: December 31, Fixed maturities Other investments Total net unrealized gains (losses) Deferred income tax 2017 2016 2015 $ 20,586 $ (23,635) $ (55,024) 1,381 21,967 (78) 3,003 (20,632) (84) 996 (54,028) (84) Net unrealized gains (losses), net of deferred income tax Change, net of deferred income tax $ $ 21,889 42,605 $ $ (20,716) $ (54,112) 33,396 $ (132,691) F-25 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 4. Investments (continued) e) Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents and Investments We are required to maintain assets on deposit to support our reinsurance operations and to serve as collateral for our reinsurance liabilities under various reinsurance agreements. We also utilize trust accounts to collateralize business with our reinsurance counterparties. These trust accounts generally take the place of letter of credit requirements. The assets in trust as collateral are primarily cash and highly rated fixed maturities. The fair value of our restricted assets was as follows: December 31, Restricted cash – third party agreements Restricted cash – related party agreements Restricted cash – U.S. state regulatory authorities Total restricted cash Restricted investments – in trust for third party agreements at fair value (amortized cost: 2017 – $1,311,538; 2016 – $1,307,926) Restricted investments AFS– in trust for related party agreements at fair value (amortized cost: 2017 – $2,256,494; 2016 – $2,242,565) Restricted investments HTM– in trust for related party agreements at fair value (amortized cost: 2017 – $1,097,801; 2016 – $752,212) Restricted investments – in trust for U.S. state regulatory authorities (amortized cost: 2017 – $4,076; 2016 – $4,059) Total restricted investments Total restricted cash and investments 2017 2016 $ 50,411 $ 73,017 156 123,584 56,891 46,777 120 103,788 1,326,695 1,299,569 2,288,472 2,225,066 1,125,626 766,135 4,147 4,238 4,744,940 4,295,008 $ 4,868,524 $ 4,398,796 F-26 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 5. Fair Value Measurements a) Fair Values of Financial Instruments ASC 825, "Disclosure About Fair Value of Financial Instruments", requires all entities to disclose the fair value of their financial instruments, both assets and liabilities recognized and not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. The following describes the valuation techniques used by the Company to determine the fair value of financial instruments held at December 31, 2017 and 2016. U.S. government and U.S. agency — Bonds issued by the U.S. Treasury, the Federal Home Loan Bank, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Government National Mortgage Association and the Federal National Mortgage Association. The fair values of U.S. treasury bonds are based on quoted market prices in active markets, and are included in the Level 1 fair value hierarchy. We believe the market for U.S. treasury bonds is an actively traded market given the high level of daily trading volume. The fair values of U.S. agency bonds are determined using the spread above the risk-free yield curve. As the yields for the risk- free yield curve and the spreads for these securities are observable market inputs, the fair values of U.S. agency bonds are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy. Non-U.S. government and supranational bonds — These securities are generally priced by independent pricing services. The Pricing Service may use current market trades for securities with similar quality, maturity and coupon. If no such trades are available, the Pricing Service typically uses analytical models which may incorporate spreads, interest rate data and market/sector news. As the significant inputs used to price non-U.S. government and supranational bonds are observable market inputs, the fair values of non-U.S. government and supranational bonds are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy. Asset-backed securities — These securities comprise CMBS and CLO originated by a variety of financial institutions that on acquisition are rated BBB-/Baa3 or higher. These securities are priced by independent pricing services and brokers. The pricing provider applies dealer quotes and other available trade information, prepayment speeds, yield curves and credit spreads to the valuation. As the significant inputs used to price the CMBS and CLO are observable market inputs, the fair value of the CMBS and CLO securities are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy. Corporate bonds — Bonds issued by corporations that on acquisition are rated BBB-/Baa3 or higher. These securities are generally priced by independent pricing services. The spreads are sourced from broker/dealers, trade prices and the new issue market. Where pricing is unavailable from pricing services, we obtain non-binding quotes from broker-dealers. As the significant inputs used to price corporate bonds are observable market inputs, the fair values of corporate bonds are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy. Municipal bonds — Bonds issued by U.S. state and municipality entities or agencies. The fair values of municipal bonds are generally priced by independent pricing services. The pricing services typically use spreads obtained from broker-dealers, trade prices and the new issue market. As the significant inputs used to price the municipal bonds are observable market inputs, municipal bonds are included in the Level 2 fair value hierarchy. Other investments — Includes both quoted and unquoted investments. The fair value of our quoted equity investment is obtained from the Pricing Service and is classified within Level 1. The quoted equity investment was sold in the third quarter of 2017. Unquoted other investments comprise investments in limited partnerships and two investments in start-up insurance entities. The fair values of the limited partnerships are determined by the fund manager based on recent filings, operating results, balance sheet stability, growth and other business and market sector fundamentals. The fair value of these investments are measured using the NAV practical expedient and therefore have not been categorized within the fair value hierarchy. If there is a reporting lag between the current period end and reporting date of the latest available fund valuation, we estimate fair values by starting with the most recently available valuation and adjusting for return estimates as well as any subscriptions and distributions that took place during the current period. The fair value of the investments in start-up insurance entities was determined using recent private market transactions and as such, the fair value is included in the Level 3 fair value hierarchy. Cash and cash equivalents (including restricted amounts), accrued investment income, reinsurance balances receivable, and certain other assets and liabilities — The carrying values reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for these financial instruments approximate their fair value due to their short term nature and are classified as Level 2. Loan to related party — The carrying value reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for this financial instrument approximates its fair value and it is included in the Level 2 hierarchy. Senior notes — The amount reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets for these financial instruments represents the carrying value of the notes. The fair values are based on indicative market pricing obtained from a third-party service provider and as such, are included in the Level 2 hierarchy. b) Fair Value Hierarchy The Company’s estimates of fair value for financial assets and financial liabilities are based on the framework established in ASC 820. The framework is based on the inputs used in valuation and gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets and requires that observable inputs be used in the valuations when available. The disclosure of fair value estimates in the ASC 820 hierarchy is based on whether the significant inputs into the valuation are observable. In determining the level of the hierarchy in which the estimate is disclosed, the highest priority is given to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs that reflect the Company’s significant market assumptions. F-27 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 5. Fair Value Measurements (continued) At December 31, 2017 and 2016, we classified our financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis in the following valuation hierarchy: December 31, 2017 AFS fixed maturities U.S. treasury bonds U.S. agency bonds – mortgage-backed U.S. agency bonds – other Non-U.S. government and supranational bonds Asset-backed securities Corporate bonds Municipal bonds Other investments Total Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Fair Value Based on NAV Practical Expedient Total Fair Value $ 60,801 $ — $ — $ — $ 60,801 — — — — — — — 2,014,614 29,782 31,876 321,410 1,583,311 2,576 — $ 60,801 $3,983,569 $ — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,500 1,500 $ 5,100 5,100 2,014,614 29,782 31,876 321,410 1,583,311 2,576 6,600 $4,050,970 As a percentage of total assets 0.9% 60.0% —% 0.1% 61.0% December 31, 2016 AFS fixed maturities U.S. treasury bonds U.S. agency bonds – mortgage-backed U.S. agency bonds – other Non-U.S. government and supranational bonds Asset-backed securities Corporate bonds Municipal bonds Other investments Total Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) Fair Value Based on NAV Practical Expedient Total Fair Value $ 5,413 $ — $ — $ — $ 5,413 — — — — — — 6,586 1,716,038 18,102 29,934 220,876 1,916,205 65,098 — $ 11,999 $3,966,253 $ — — — — — — — — — — — — 1,000 1,000 $ 5,474 5,474 1,716,038 18,102 29,934 220,876 1,916,205 65,098 13,060 $3,984,726 As a percentage of total assets 0.2% 63.4% —% 0.1% 63.7% The Company utilizes a Pricing Service to assist in determining the fair value of our investments; however, management is ultimately responsible for all fair values presented in the Company’s financial statements. This includes responsibility for monitoring the fair value process, ensuring objective and reliable valuation practices and pricing of assets and liabilities and pricing sources. The Company analyzes and reviews the information and prices received from the Pricing Service to ensure that the prices represent a reasonable estimate of the fair value. The Pricing Service was utilized to estimate fair value measurements for approximately 99.8% and 98.8% of its fixed maturities at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Pricing Service utilizes market quotations for fixed maturity securities that have quoted market prices in active markets. Since fixed maturities other than U.S. treasury bonds generally do not trade actively on a daily basis, the Pricing Service prepares estimates of fair value measurements using relevant market data, benchmark curves, sector groupings and matrix pricing and these have been classified as Level 2. F-28 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 5. Fair Value Measurements (continued) At December 31, 2017 and 2016, 0.2% and 1.2%, respectively, of the fixed maturities are valued using the market approach. At each of those dates, a total of three securities, or approximately $9,489 and $56,674, respectively, of Level 2 fixed maturities, were priced using a quotation from a broker and/or custodian as opposed to the Pricing Service due to lack of information available. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, we have not adjusted any pricing provided to us based on the review performed by our investment managers. The Company utilized a Pricing Service to estimate fair value measurement for the quoted equity investment reflecting the closing price quoted for the final trading day of the period and is included in Level 1. The quoted equity investment was sold in the third quarter of 2017. There have not been any transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 and there has not been any transfers to or from Level 3 during the periods represented by these Consolidated Financial Statements. c) Level 3 Financial Instruments At December 31, 2017, the Company also has investments of $1,500 (December 31, 2016 - $1,000) in start-up insurance entities, the fair value of each was determined using recent private market transactions. Due to the significant unobservable inputs in these valuations, the Company includes the estimate of the fair value of these unquoted investments as Level 3. The Company has determined that its investments in Level 3 securities are not material to its financial position or results of operations. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, there have been no transfers into or out of Level 3. (d) Financial Instruments not measured at Fair Value The following table presents the fair value and carrying value of the financial instruments not measured at fair value: Financial Assets HTM – corporate bonds HTM - municipal bonds Total financial assets Financial Liabilities Senior Notes - MHLA – 6.625% Senior Notes - MHNC – 7.75% Senior Notes - MHNB – 8.00%(1) Total financial liabilities December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value $ $ $ $ 1,037,464 60,337 1,097,801 $ $ 1,065,245 60,381 1,125,626 $ $ 752,212 — 752,212 $ $ 766,135 — 766,135 110,000 $ 101,200 $ 110,000 $ 152,500 149,029 — — 152,500 100,000 262,500 $ 250,229 $ 362,500 $ 111,452 164,700 101,600 377,752 (1) Please refer to "Note 7. Long-Term Debt", for disclosure regarding the redemption of the 2012 Senior Notes during the second quarter of 2017. 6. Goodwill and Intangible Assets The following table show the analysis of goodwill and intangible assets: December 31, 2015 Impairment losses Cumulative translation adjustment Amortization December 31, 2016 Amortization December 31, 2017 Goodwill Intangible Assets Total $ $ $ $ 58,936 (1,800) 56 — $ 22,984 — — (2,461) 57,192 $ 20,523 $ — (2,132) 57,192 $ 18,391 $ 81,920 (1,800) 56 (2,461) 77,715 (2,132) 75,583 On November 4, 2015, Maiden US finalized the sale of its wholly owned subsidiary, Maiden Specialty Insurance Company ("Maiden Specialty"), to Clear Blue Financial Holdings, LLC ("Clear Blue"). On the same date, the goodwill and intangible assets disposed of, by way of this sale agreement, were $1,120 and $3,200, respectively. During 2015, the Company acquired a majority interest in Regulatory Capital Limited, trading as Insurance Regulatory Capital ("IRC"), a licensed asset manager in Ireland. IRC offers solutions designed to meet the capital and risk management needs of mid-sized insurance companies. The Company recognized goodwill of $1,800 as a result of the acquisition. F-29 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 6. Goodwill and Intangible Assets (continued) The goodwill and intangible assets are assigned to our Diversified Reinsurance segment and are subject to annual impairment testing. During 2016, the Company has written off the goodwill relating to the acquisition of a majority interest in IRC which was deemed to be permanently impaired. The Company recognized an impairment loss of $1,800 as a result, which is presented in the consolidated statement of income as part of foreign exchange and other losses (gains). No impairment was recorded during the years ended December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2015. The following tables show the analysis of goodwill and intangible assets: December 31, 2017 Goodwill State licenses Customer relationships Net balance December 31, 2016 Goodwill State licenses Customer relationships Net balance $ $ $ $ Gross Accumulated Amortization Accumulated Impairment Net Useful Life 58,992 $ 4,527 51,400 — $ — (37,536) 114,919 $ (37,536) $ (1,800) $ — — (1,800) $ 57,192 Indefinite 4,527 Indefinite 13,864 15 years double declining 75,583 Gross Accumulated Amortization Accumulated Impairment 58,992 $ — $ 4,527 51,400 — (35,404) 114,919 $ (35,404) $ (1,800) $ — — (1,800) $ Net Useful Life 57,192 Indefinite Indefinite 15 years double declining 4,527 15,996 77,715 The estimated amortization of intangible assets for the next five years is as follows: 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 $ 1,848 1,602 1,388 1,203 1,043 F-30 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 7. Long-Term Debt Senior Notes At December 31, 2017, Maiden Holdings and its wholly owned subsidiary, Maiden Holdings North America, Ltd. ("Maiden NA"), both have an outstanding public debt offering of senior notes which were issued in 2016 and 2013, respectively (the "Senior Notes"). The 2013 Senior Notes issuance made by Maiden NA is fully and unconditionally guaranteed by Maiden Holdings. The Senior Notes are unsecured and unsubordinated obligation of the Company. On June 27, 2017, we fully redeemed all of the 2012 Senior Notes using a portion of the proceeds from the Preference Shares - Series D issuance (see related discussion in "Note 13. Shareholders' Equity"). The 2012 Senior Notes were redeemed at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount of $100,000 plus accrued and unpaid interest on the principal amount being redeemed up to, but not including, the redemption date. As a result, the Company accelerated the amortization of the remaining 2012 Senior Note issuance cost of $2,809. The following table details the Company's Senior Notes issuances at December 31, 2017 and 2016: December 31, 2017 Principal amount Less: unamortized issuance costs Carrying value December 31, 2016 Principal amount Less: unamortized issuance costs Carrying value Other details: Original debt issuance costs Maturity date Earliest redeemable date (for cash) Coupon rate Effective interest rate 2016 Senior Notes 2013 Senior Notes 2012 Senior Notes Total 110,000 3,654 106,346 2016 Senior Notes 110,000 3,694 106,306 $ $ $ $ 152,500 4,364 148,136 2013 Senior Notes 152,500 4,532 147,968 $ $ $ $ — $ 262,500 — 8,018 — $ 254,482 2012 Senior Notes 100,000 2,865 97,135 $ $ Total 362,500 11,091 351,409 3,715 $ 5,054 $ 3,406 $ $ $ $ $ June 14, 2046 Dec 1, 2043 Mar 27, 2042 June 14, 2021 Dec 1, 2018 Mar 27, 2017 6.625% 7.07% 7.75% 8.04% 8.00% 8.31% The interest expense incurred on the Senior Notes for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $22,996 (2016 - $27,827, 2015 - $28,687), of which $1,342 and $1,453 was accrued at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The issuance costs related to the Senior Notes were capitalized and are being amortized over the life of the Senior Notes. The amount of amortization expense was $264 for the year ended December 31, 2017 (2016 - $346, 2015 - $376). F-31 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 8. Reinsurance We use reinsurance and retrocessional agreements ("ceded reinsurance") to mitigate volatility, reduce our exposure to certain risks and to provide capital support. Additionally, effective January 1, 2015, Maiden Bermuda entered into a retrocessional quota share agreement with a highly rated global insurer to cede certain lines of business from both of our reportable segments.Each of these agreements provide for recovery from reinsurers or retrocessionaires of a portion of loss and LAE under certain circumstances without relieving the Company of its obligations to the policyholders. The Company remains liable to the extent that any of our reinsurers or retrocessionaires fails to meet their obligations. Loss and LAE incurred and premiums earned are reported after deduction for reinsurance and retrocession. In the event that one or more of our reinsurers or retrocessionaires are unable to meet their obligations under these reinsurance or retrocessional agreements, the Company would not realize the full value of the reinsurance recoverable balances. The effect of ceded reinsurance on net premiums written and earned and on net loss and LAE for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was as follows: For the Year Ended December 31, Premiums written Direct Assumed Ceded Net Premiums earned Direct Assumed Ceded Net Loss and LAE Gross loss and LAE Loss and LAE ceded Net 2017 2016 2015 $ $ $ $ $ $ 5,765 $ 8,045 $ 9,160 2,810,286 2,823,303 2,653,666 (54,063) (176,396) (148,710) 2,761,988 $ 2,654,952 $ 2,514,116 6,579 $ 9,766 $ 26,358 2,815,953 2,698,879 2,481,515 (89,753) (140,495) (78,804) 2,732,779 $ 2,568,150 $ 2,429,069 2,276,682 $ 1,918,797 $ 1,687,564 (116,671) (98,891) (53,994) 2,160,011 $ 1,819,906 $ 1,633,570 The Company's reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses balance at December 31, 2017 was $117,611 (2016 - $99,936). The reinsurers and retrocessionaires with the three largest balances accounted for 34.0%, 19.2% and 17.4%, respectively, of the Company's reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses balance at December 31, 2017 (2016 – 54.8%, 31.6% and 2.9%, respectively). At December 31, 2017, 98.6% (2016 - 97.2%) of the reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses was due from reinsurers and retrocessionaires with credit ratings from A.M Best of A or better, and 1.4% (2016 - 2.8%) of the reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses was due from reinsurers with ratings of B++ or lower. At December 31, 2017, 76.9% (December 31, 2016 - 98.6%) of reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses of $1,656 (2016 - $2,843) due from reinsurers with ratings of B++ or lower, were collateralized. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had no valuation allowance against reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses. F-32 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 9. Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses General The Company believes the most significant accounting judgment made by management is its estimate of loss and LAE reserves. Loss and LAE reserves represent estimates, including actuarial projections of the ultimate settlement and costs for unpaid loss and LAE arising from the reinsurance contracts entered into by the Company. The Company establishes its loss and LAE reserves by taking losses reported to the Company by insureds and ceding companies, but which have not yet been paid ("case reserves"), adding estimates for the anticipated cost of claims incurred but not yet reported to the Company, or incurred but not enough reported to the Company (collectively referred to as "IBNR") and, if deemed necessary, adding costs for additional case reserves which represent the Company’s estimates for claims related to specific contracts previously reported to the Company which it believes may not be adequately estimated by the client as of that date, or adequately covered in the application of IBNR. Our reserve for loss and LAE comprises: December 31, Reserve for reported loss and LAE Reserve for losses IBNR Reserve for loss and LAE 2017 2016 $ $ 1,925,151 $ 1,617,956 1,622,097 1,278,540 3,547,248 $ 2,896,496 The following table represents a reconciliation of our beginning and ending gross and net loss and LAE reserves: For the Year Ended December 31, Gross loss and LAE reserves, January 1 2017 2,896,496 $ 2016 2,510,101 $ $ Less: reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses, January 1 99,936 71,248 2015 2,271,292 75,873 Net loss and LAE reserves, January 1 Net incurred losses related to: Current year Prior years Net paid losses related to: Current year Prior years Effect of foreign exchange movements Net loss and LAE reserves, December 31 Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses, December 31 2,796,560 2,438,853 2,195,419 1,802,118 357,893 2,160,011 1,600,454 219,452 1,819,906 1,558,704 74,866 1,633,570 (634,371) (948,000) (1,582,371) 55,437 3,429,637 117,611 (430,707) (1,006,884) (1,437,591) (24,608) 2,796,560 99,936 (457,517) (892,840) (1,350,357) (39,779) 2,438,853 71,248 Gross loss and LAE reserves, December 31 $ 3,547,248 $ 2,896,496 $ 2,510,101 The Company uses both historical experience and industry-wide loss development factors to provide a reasonable basis for estimating future losses. In the future, certain events may be beyond the control of management, such as changes in law, judicial interpretations of law, and inflation, which may favorably or unfavorably impact the ultimate settlement of the Company’s loss and LAE reserves. The anticipated effect of inflation is implicitly considered when estimating liabilities for losses and LAE. While anticipated changes in claim costs due to inflation are considered in estimating the ultimate claim costs, changes in the average severity of claims are caused by a number of factors that vary with the individual type of policy written. Ultimate losses are projected based on historical trends adjusted for implemented changes in underwriting standards, policy provisions, and general economic trends. Those anticipated trends are monitored based on actual development and are modified if necessary. The reserving process begins with the collection and analysis of paid losses and incurred claims data for each of our contracts. While reserves are reviewed on a contract by contract basis, paid losses and incurred claims data is also aggregated into reserving segments. The segmental data is disaggregated by reserving class and further disaggregated by either accident year (i.e. the year in which the loss event occurred) or by underwriting year (i.e. the year in which the contract generating the premium and losses incepted). The Company uses underwriting year information to analyze our Diversified Reinsurance segment and subsequently allocate reserves to the respective accident years. The reserving lines of business are selected to ensure that the underlying business have homogeneous loss development characteristics, while remaining large enough to make the estimation of trends credible. F-33 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 9. Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses (continued) Actuarial Methods Used to Estimate Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves The Company utilizes a variety of standard actuarial methods in its analysis of loss reserves. The selections from these various methods are based on the loss development characteristics of the specific line of business and significant actuarial judgment. The actuarial methods the Company utilizes include: The Expected Loss Ratio ("ELR") method is a technique that multiplicatively applies an expected loss ratio to earned premium to yield estimated ultimate losses. The ELR assumption is generally derived from pricing information and historical experience of the business. This method is frequently used for the purpose of stability in the early valuations of an underwriting year with large and uncertain loss development factors. This technique does not take into account actual loss emergence for the underwriting year being projected. As an underwriting year matures and actual loss experience becomes more credible, other methods may be applied in determining the estimated ultimate losses. The Loss Development ("LD") method is a reserving method in which ultimate losses are estimated by applying a loss development factor to actual reported (or paid) loss experience. This method fully utilizes actual experience. Multiplication of underwriting year actual reported (or paid) losses by its respective development factor produces the estimated ultimate losses. The LD method is based upon the assumption that the relative change in a given underwriting year’s losses from one evaluation point to the next is similar to the relative change in prior underwriting years’ losses at similar evaluation points. In addition, this method is based on the assumption that the reserving and payment patterns as well as the claim handling procedures have not changed substantially over time. When a company has a sufficiently reliable loss development history, a development pattern based on the company’s historical indications may be used to develop losses to ultimate values. The Bornhuetter-Ferguson ("BF") reserving technique is used for long-tailed or lower frequency, more volatile lines. It is also useful in situations where the reported loss experience is relatively immature and/or lacks sufficient credibility for the application of methods that are more heavily reliant on emerged experience. The BF method is an additive IBNR method that combines the ELR and LD techniques by splitting the expected loss into two pieces - expected reported (or paid) losses and expected unreported (or unpaid) losses. Expected unreported (unpaid) losses, estimated by the use of loss development factors, are added to the current actual reported (or paid) losses to produce an estimate of ultimate losses by underwriting year. The BF method introduces an element of stability that moderates the impact of inconsistent changes in paid and reported losses. The average frequency and severity ("FS") technique is used for lines where claim count is available, and the estimate of loss development factors is more difficult due to volatility in historical data. The available data for such lines is usually more volatile in the estimation of future losses using the LD and BF reserving methods. The frequency and severity method uses historical data to estimate the average number of ultimate claims (frequency) and the average costs of closed claims (severity). The estimate of ultimate losses by underwriting year is the result of the multiplication of the ultimate number of claims and the average cost of a claim. With the guidance of the methods above, actuarial judgment is applied in the determination of ultimate losses. In general, the Company’s segments have varying levels of seasoning with which the Company has direct experience and as a result, differing methods are utilized to estimate loss and LAE reserves in each segment. In the Diversified Reinsurance segment, the Company’s executive and technical management, including Claims, Underwriting and Actuarial, have significant experience with this book of business, which also has more than 30 years of loss experience associated with it. In general for the Diversified Reinsurance segment, the Company utilizes the ELR approach at the onset of reserving an account, the BF method for business with less but maturing loss experience, and as the experience matures the LD method. For proportional or pro-rata business, the Company typically relies heavily on the actual historical contract experience to estimate reserving parameters such as loss development factors, whereas for excess of loss business there will be more usage of industry and/or Company benchmark assumptions. The Company has underwritten the AmTrust Reinsurance segment since July 1, 2007. The majority of the exposure in the underlying book of business has significant seasoning, and allows for a significant amount of credibility in using parameters derived from historical experience to calculate reserve estimates. Some segments of the book are a result of recent acquisitions or newer markets for AmTrust. These segments require a greater level of assumptions and professional judgment in deriving ultimate losses, which inherently implies a wider range of reasonable estimates. As a result, we have tended to rely on a weighted approach which primarily employs the LD method for aspects of the segment with ample historical data, while also considering the ELR or BF method for exposure resulting from recent acquisitions, or a relative business with a more limited level of experience. The FS method is also considered for segments of the AmTrust book of business for which claim count information is available. The Company’s actuarial analysis of this book of business is more refined in that it utilizes a combination of quarterly and annual data instead of contract period data in totality. Additional data detailing items such as class of business, state, claim counts, frequency and severity is available, further enhancing the reserve analysis. F-34 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 9. Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses (continued) Prior Year Development Prior period development arises from changes to loss estimates recognized in the current year that relate to loss reserves in previous calendar years. The development reflects changes in management's best estimate of the ultimate losses under the relevant reinsurance policies after review of changes in actuarial assessments. The following table summarizes adverse prior period development experienced in each of our reportable segments for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015: For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 Diversified Reinsurance AmTrust Reinsurance Other $ (71,384) $ (96,788) (49,856) (239,896) $ (54,000) (9,100) (10,214) $ (14,556) (12,202) Total (321,494) (165,344) (71,158) During 2017, the Company increased incurred losses for 2016 and prior accident years by $357,893 or 12.8% of prior year net loss and LAE reserves compared to $219,452 or 9.0% in 2016 and $74,866 or 3.3% in 2015. The increase in prior year incurred losses was primarily due to the $321,494 of adverse development driven by $239,896 of adverse development in the AmTrust Reinsurance segment but also contributed to by $71,384 in the Diversified Reinsurance and $10,214 in the Company's run-off business within the Other category. In addition, some premium for prior accident years is reported to us in subsequent periods. This leads to increases in the provision for loss and LAE in prior years during current periods, which is not considered adverse development. During 2017, incurred losses in the AmTrust segment increased $37,212 associated with $57,026 of earned premium reported during 2017 attributable to 2016 and prior accident years. Due to loss sensitive features of certain contracts, favorable (or unfavorable) loss reserve development does not necessarily result in a commensurate amount of additional (or reduced) underwriting income, as ceding commission may be adjusted proportionally to the amount of loss development, pursuant to the terms of the individual contracts. In 2016, the Company recognized approximately $165,344 of adverse prior year development, net of commission changes on adjustable contracts largely due to significant fourth quarter adverse development in commercial auto liability in both the Diversified Reinsurance and AmTrust Reinsurance segments. In the Diversified Reinsurance segment, the adverse prior year development was $71,384 for the year ended December 31, 2017 which was largely due to higher than expected loss emergence emanating primarily from Commercial Auto. Casualty Commercial Auto Liability development during 2017 was $58,776, with $37,485 coming from two accounts which are no longer in-force but which had significantly greater loss emergence during 2017 than expected. In 2016, the development was due to significant fourth quarter adverse development in commercial auto liability. In the AmTrust Reinsurance segment, the adverse prior year development was $239,896 for the year ended December 31, 2017 largely related to the Workers' Compensation of $126,603 and General Liability of $90,784, and to a lesser extent Commercial Auto liability of $19,877. The loss development observed was in part attributable to staffing and other claims operation changes in the cedant's claims department which have distorted historical loss patterns. In 2016, the adverse development largely came from program commercial auto as well as program general liability. Our Other category also incurred adverse prior year development of $10,214 for the year ended December 31, 2017 (2016 - $14,556, 2015 - $12,202) due to increased reserves in the remaining run-off litigated U.S. E&S property claims and increased reserves in the run-off of the NGHC Quota Share Reinsurance Agreement. a) Claims Development The following is a summary of the Company's incurred losses and paid losses development by accident year, net of reinsurance, from the last seven calendar years including the total reserve for losses, IBNR, plus development on reported loss and LAE for both of our reportable segments, Diversified Reinsurance and AmTrust Reinsurance, as of December 31, 2017. Information prior to 2017 is included as unaudited supplementary information. Seven years of information has been presented only as it was impractical to obtain the sufficiently detailed additional information on those earlier years. The incurred and paid amounts have been translated from the local currency to U.S. dollars using the December 31, 2017 spot rate for all years presented in the table below in order to isolate changes in foreign exchange rates from loss development. Information regarding our Other category has not been presented in the development tables below but is included in the reconciliation, as these losses include amounts from our former NGHC Quota Share segment and the remnants of the U.S. excess and surplus business, which are in run-off and related IBNR amounts are not currently material. As a reinsurer of primarily quota share contracts, claim counts are available on a very limited basis. Therefore claim counts have not been provided in the tables below as it is impractical to do so. F-35 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 9. Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses (continued) The Diversified Reinsurance segment incurred losses and paid losses are analyzed by the following lines of business: (1) Pro- rata Property; (2) Pro-rata Casualty (a) Personal Auto, (b) Commercial Auto, (c)Workers' Compensation and Other Liability; (3) Excess of Loss ("XOL") Property; (4) XOL Casualty, (a) Commercial Auto, (b) Workers' Compensation, (c) Other liability; (5) Accident and Health ("A&H"); and (6) International. The AmTrust Reinsurance segment incurred losses and paid losses are analyzed by the following lines of business: (1) Workers’ Compensation; (2) Commercial Auto Liability; (3) General Liability; (4) European Hospital Liability; and (5) All Other Lines. There are a number of factors to consider when evaluating the information in these tables: • In the Diversified Reinsurance segment, contracts are written on both an accident year and underwriting year basis, many are multi-line and the majority of the premium is associated with proportional contracts. Many proportional treaty reinsurance contracts are submitted using quarterly bordereau reporting by underwriting year. However, the remaining losses can generally only be allocated to accident years based on estimated premium earning and loss reporting patterns. Further estimates are required to allocate losses to line of business. Multi-line accounts are generally analyzed on an individual basis by line of business, but are booked in the Company’s records to a contract, rather than to each individual line of business within a contract. For the purpose of this disclosure allocations are made to the various lines of business. Management’s assumptions and allocation procedures for these tables may produce results that differ from the actual loss emergence reported by line of business each quarter; • The AmTrust Reinsurance segment consists primarily of two contracts, the European Hospital Liability quota share and a much larger quota share that includes all other covered business, the AmTrust Quota Share Reinsurance Agreement ("Reinsurance Agreement"). There is also a small amount of excess of loss business that has not been written since 2009 which is included as a reconciling item. Maiden receives several cession statements and uses these to report premiums in three categories - Small Business Commercial, Specialty Program and Specialty Risk and Extended Warranty in Note 3 Segment Information. The tables provided include allocations of IBNR reserves to line of business by accident year. Management’s assumptions and allocation procedures for these tables may produce results that differ from the actual loss emergence reported by line of business each quarter; • For both segments, the premium and exposure for prior accident years is often reported to us in subsequent periods, as reporting lags exist from an insurer to a reinsurer. This leads to increases in the provision for loss and LAE in prior years, but does not reduce expected income (and in many cases can result in additional income); • In the Diversified Reinsurance segment, our U.S. operations have adjustable commission features on a significant portion of its business which is not reflected in this loss disclosure, but mitigates the effect of changes in the estimates of ultimate loss on underwriting income; and • Some Excess of Loss business written in the Diversified Reinsurance segment contains Annual Aggregate Deductibles which apply on a contract, not line of business, basis. These deductible further complicate the allocation to line of business. Diversified Reinsurance Segment The following table represents information on the Company's incurred losses and LAE and cumulative paid losses and LAE, both net of reinsurance, since 2011 for our Diversified Reinsurance segment. The development tables below included reserves acquired from the loss portfolio transfer agreement associated with the GMAC RE business as at October 31, 2008 of $755,554 and reserves acquired from the loss portfolio transfer agreement associated with the GMAC International Insurance Services ("IIS") business as at November 30, 2010 of $98,827. For the purposes of the disclosure, the reserves from each of the loss portfolio transfers were allocated to the original accident year. Many pro-rata contracts are big enough that specific company development patterns are used. The ELR from the pricing of the account is typically used for the first year or more until the data suggests an alternative result is likely. Use of the ELR method transitions to the BF and then the LD method. For smaller contracts, benchmark development patterns may be used in both the pricing to establish the ELR and the reserving. The use of benchmark patterns is more prevalent in excess of loss business and the movement to experience based methods is slower. F-36 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 9. Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses (continued) Diversified Reinsurance: Property Pro-rata The majority of our pro-rata Property business is the property component of multi-line quota shares. In the Diversified Reinsurance segment, most of this exposure comes from Private Passenger Auto quota shares that include coverage for both casualty and automobile physical damage. Private Passenger Auto quota shares typically have either a property occurrence limit or have reinsurance that protects the Company's exposure. This reinsurance can be either purchased by the cedant or by the Company. Property exposures other than auto are written with an occurrence limit. Our initial underwriting year loss projections are generally based on the ELR method, derived from account pricing analyses. Payment and reporting patterns are relatively short-tailed, allowing for rapid movement to loss development methods. Diversified Reinsurance - Property - Pro-rata For the Year Ended December 31, Accident Year: 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance At December 31, 2017 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total IBNR (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) $ 8,600 $ 8,748 $ 8,735 $ 8,710 $ 8,695 $ 8,687 $ 8,687 $ 62,906 83,101 93,969 63,421 86,056 63,078 85,243 63,223 85,067 101,907 100,241 100,635 96,681 95,977 55,222 94,837 50,476 75,027 63,345 85,019 99,902 95,160 47,220 77,207 55,642 63,256 85,117 63,092 85,687 100,154 100,174 95,755 47,833 77,703 57,320 53,917 96,667 46,258 77,001 56,454 53,265 89,120 $ 676,405 $ 10 81 214 177 614 413 1,707 3,039 10,970 29,514 46,739 For the Year Ended December 31, Accident Year: 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) Cumulative paid losses and LAE, net of reinsurance 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Total net reserves $ $ 7,913 53,847 59,259 44,437 $ 8,333 58,920 73,510 72,600 44,152 $ 8,527 61,053 79,660 88,796 66,148 18,952 $ $ 8,571 61,955 82,256 96,306 84,466 28,607 27,901 8,601 62,463 83,239 98,084 90,071 43,035 51,896 19,603 $ 8,659 62,667 85,132 98,970 92,958 45,232 66,675 42,930 17,849 8,659 62,832 85,234 99,504 94,885 45,406 73,404 51,707 34,847 40,573 $ 597,051 $ 79,354 F-37 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 9. Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses (continued) Diversified Reinsurance: Casualty - Personal Auto Pro-rata All of the pro-rata Personal Auto in this category is the liability portion of Personal Auto quota shares. The majority of this business is non-standard Personal Auto which has very low, typically minimum financial responsibility limits which vary by state. The balance is standard or preferred business with higher limits. Personal injury protection, medical payments and uninsured motorists are also covered. Our initial underwriting year loss projections are generally based on the ELR method, primarily derived from individual account pricing analyses. Payment and reporting patterns are relatively short-tailed, allowing for rapid movement to loss development methods. Diversified Reinsurance - Casualty Personal Auto - Pro-rata For the Year Ended December 31, Accident Year: 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total For the Year Ended December 31, Accident Year: 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Total net reserves Incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance At December 31, 2017 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total IBNR (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) $ 34,433 $ 34,271 $ 33,762 $ 33,684 $ 33,672 $ 33,621 $ 33,573 $ 50,752 52,068 95,183 50,982 52,307 51,488 53,983 100,051 100,154 97,561 94,870 88,567 51,335 53,652 97,956 93,430 84,759 51,285 53,526 96,740 91,612 78,156 51,281 53,392 96,898 91,800 78,085 51,258 53,255 96,661 92,233 77,834 116,887 119,267 121,538 121,068 38 20 30 221 66 217 12 87,420 94,363 113,617 98,637 113,609 161,355 $ 899,483 $ 1,493 29,308 46,835 78,240 Cumulative paid losses and LAE, net of reinsurance 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) $ 32,151 46,510 $ 32,908 49,547 $ 33,192 50,482 $ 33,251 50,675 $ 33,309 51,180 $ 33,581 51,192 $ 33,534 51,216 32,427 59,279 44,877 87,558 53,807 48,814 87,649 66,419 55,816 52,933 94,042 78,000 56,683 78,169 52,990 95,771 90,438 75,542 91,181 26,564 53,212 96,369 90,657 77,236 53,212 96,427 91,850 77,266 118,728 119,924 89,940 78,465 97,825 74,988 119,775 $ 816,017 $ 83,466 F-38 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 9. Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses (continued) Diversified Reinsurance: Casualty Commercial Auto - Pro-rata All of the pro-rata Commercial Auto in this category is the liability portion of Commercial Auto quota shares. This business is separated from our Personal Auto liability due to the higher limits typically written on Commercial Auto exposures. Coverage is primarily for the service and commercial vehicle classification and to a lesser extent long haul trucking, common carrier or large fleet exposures. Commercial Auto has been an area of focus due to overall industry concerns regarding increases in loss frequency and severity. Our initial underwriting year loss projections are generally based on the ELR method, primarily derived from individual account pricing analyses. Payment and reporting patterns are can be variable depending on the cedant, class of business, and venue. Transition to BF method and ultimately to LD method can vary in timing depending on our assessment of the stability of such indications. Diversified Reinsurance - Casualty Commercial Auto - Pro-rata For the Year Ended December 31, Accident Year: 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total For the Year Ended December 31, Accident Year: 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Total net reserves Incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance At December 31, 2017 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total IBNR (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) $ 26,291 $ 27,299 $ 26,480 $ 26,157 $ 25,893 $ 25,892 $ 25,904 $ 14,312 21,950 49,018 16,867 28,798 54,980 39,912 16,139 27,040 55,466 43,776 38,203 16,196 27,288 57,776 45,616 38,256 47,198 16,251 28,609 57,208 47,465 41,071 48,635 39,924 16,282 28,570 59,221 53,443 44,645 49,719 43,933 27,256 16,332 28,246 59,938 57,393 53,463 58,335 49,078 27,313 27,180 $ 403,182 $ 31 5 58 281 1,916 5,528 10,605 5,696 5,652 17,124 46,896 Cumulative paid losses and LAE, net of reinsurance 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) $ 16,359 $ 19,468 $ 25,695 $ 25,754 $ 25,790 $ 25,802 $ 25,803 7,253 9,721 6,344 12,644 16,941 23,776 6,807 15,715 25,396 38,394 15,715 4,312 16,035 26,807 39,776 24,721 11,360 5,264 16,179 27,981 51,084 42,384 24,003 23,095 8,026 16,215 28,127 55,199 42,690 29,720 24,311 10,415 978 16,227 28,137 57,290 47,493 41,317 39,826 13,041 646 8,308 $ 278,088 $ 125,094 F-39 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 9. Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses (continued) Diversified Reinsurance: Property - XOL This category is composed of Property business that is either part of a multi-line or a Property only excess of loss treaty. Large limits with high attachment points are generally avoided. Excess of loss Property exposures are written on a per risk basis with an occurrence limit that applies to the aggregation of all Property losses associated with a particular event. This mitigates the Company’s exposure to losses from catastrophes. Our initial underwriting year loss projections are generally based on the ELR method, derived either from account pricing analyses or historical performance metrics. Payment and reporting patterns are relatively short-tailed, allowing for rapid movement to the LD method. Diversified Reinsurance - Property - XOL For the Year Ended December 31, Accident Year: 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance At December 31, 2017 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total IBNR (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) $ 7,451 $ 7,263 $ 7,198 $ 7,275 $ 7,227 $ 7,245 $ 7,597 $ 46,589 39,922 59,512 45,983 38,690 57,472 51,286 45,419 35,536 60,344 68,537 54,354 46,001 35,483 61,403 67,303 68,893 49,067 46,465 35,785 61,057 67,487 69,009 65,025 55,875 46,095 36,147 60,834 66,219 68,540 65,853 57,652 38,563 45,983 36,319 61,103 68,224 69,976 65,552 58,675 33,067 33,256 48 244 271 786 1,261 1,927 3,487 3,807 1,847 3,705 $ 479,752 $ 17,383 For the Year Ended December 31, Accident Year: 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) Cumulative paid losses and LAE, net of reinsurance 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Total net reserves $ $ 6,467 36,636 25,373 22,923 $ 6,722 42,022 30,650 43,849 25,811 $ 6,914 43,126 33,135 53,325 48,818 21,675 $ $ 6,992 44,509 34,266 57,121 57,227 49,324 20,105 7,027 45,146 34,968 58,038 59,611 58,938 44,629 13,854 $ 7,082 45,266 35,553 59,362 62,845 61,942 56,169 33,338 3,919 7,470 45,388 35,888 59,755 65,007 64,996 58,251 44,379 18,054 12,677 $ 411,865 $ 67,887 F-40 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 9. Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses (continued) Diversified Reinsurance: Commercial Auto - XOL The Commercial Auto class of business provides auto liability and physical damage coverages, but the vast majority of the losses emanate from liability exposures. Coverage includes service and commercial vehicle classification and also long haul trucking, common carrier or large fleet exposures. This category is composed of Commercial Auto business that is either part of a multi-line or a Commercial Auto only excess of loss treaty or a facultative certificate. Facultative certificates are policies written to cover individually underwritten and priced specific risks for a ceding company. The rest of the excess commercial auto business is written as part of a treaty where the Company underwrites the ceding company but not each individual risk. Our initial underwriting year loss projections are generally based on the ELR method, derived either from account pricing analyses or historical performance metrics. Payment and reporting patterns are medium-tailed, and the movement away from the ELR to the BF or the LD methods may take several years. In some cases, due to changing development characteristics in the line of business, an average FS methodology may be employed. Diversified Reinsurance - Commercial Auto - XOL For the Year Ended December 31, Accident Year: 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance At December 31, 2017 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total IBNR (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) $ 45,465 $ 40,837 $ 40,781 $ 41,861 $ 41,761 $ 41,936 $ 42,070 $ 39,452 35,691 45,054 35,925 28,826 44,651 43,445 41,326 28,379 48,073 42,995 54,131 44,478 33,487 53,108 44,323 52,533 57,566 43,496 35,891 57,620 51,793 69,732 62,156 47,445 44,081 37,611 59,931 55,352 94,178 75,867 48,355 36,304 44,042 37,855 60,957 55,266 100,326 88,298 59,457 37,081 25,333 334 776 577 1,263 2,751 7,849 11,720 7,060 2,252 4,186 $ 550,685 $ 38,768 Cumulative paid losses and LAE, net of reinsurance For the Year Ended December 31, Accident Year: 2008 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) $ 26,199 $ 32,110 $ 36,455 $ 39,165 $ 41,074 $ 41,246 $ 41,436 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Total net reserves 8,956 1,900 1,012 18,865 7,957 5,462 1,496 27,059 17,089 16,955 4,099 1,181 27,096 25,500 31,556 26,337 10,359 1,574 29,956 30,921 49,640 39,634 40,021 17,830 5,261 33,122 34,956 52,774 40,909 51,333 24,520 8,435 849 41,760 36,310 58,139 45,001 72,202 43,614 9,718 2,241 1,643 $ 352,064 $ 198,621 F-41 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 9. Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses (continued) Diversified Reinsurance: Workers' Compensation - XOL The Workers' Compensation and employers liability treaty exposures focus primarily on regional or super-regional insurers with low to medium hazard exposures for small to medium sized employers. All Workers' Compensation excess coverages are written on an occurrence basis. This category is composed of Workers' Compensation business that is either part of a multi-line or a Workers' Compensation only excess of loss treaty or a facultative certificate. Facultative certificates are policies written to cover individually underwritten and priced specific risks for a ceding company. The rest of the excess workers' compensation business is written as part of a treaty where the Company underwrites the ceding company but not each individual risk. Reinsurance is used to limit the Company’s exposure when higher treaty limits are written. Our initial underwriting year loss projections are generally based on the ELR method, derived either from account pricing analysis or historical performance metrics. Excess workers' compensation exposures typically have long claim payment and reporting patterns, even with the modest limits written. Claims can change due to many factors including, but not limited to, changes in medical inflation, judicial inflation and changing social trends. In addition, ceding company claim practices can influence the ultimate severity of excess claims. The ELR method is generally used for longer periods than for other lines. Diversified Reinsurance - Workers' Compensation - XOL For the Year Ended December 31, Accident Year: 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total For the Year Ended December 31, Accident Year: 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance At December 31, 2017 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total IBNR (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) $ 26,823 $ 27,963 $ 26,736 $ 25,534 $ 24,731 $ 23,955 $ 22,873 $ 24,618 24,132 37,335 23,583 19,270 39,719 30,759 21,720 16,921 40,274 31,353 39,892 23,153 12,674 39,434 26,093 36,328 47,333 21,125 13,140 40,057 23,801 32,218 42,982 38,583 22,241 15,598 40,744 23,300 23,252 37,544 34,290 47,869 22,502 17,104 40,796 21,013 21,659 39,542 33,028 40,459 55,194 3,129 3,003 1,441 12,675 6,700 9,333 13,145 15,998 25,573 39,689 $ 314,170 $ 130,686 Cumulative paid losses and LAE, net of reinsurance 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) $ 5,659 $ 7,316 $ 10,530 $ 11,105 $ 14,094 $ 15,236 $ 15,543 2,027 661 514 3,389 1,244 2,122 546 4,890 1,999 5,216 1,318 890 6,524 3,301 8,656 2,364 2,931 2,003 15,679 3,870 11,426 4,220 4,636 3,030 341 16,239 11,804 11,834 8,327 6,191 10,526 5,634 4,561 16,386 13,394 13,976 8,960 7,743 14,670 7,495 4,614 3,309 $ 106,090 Total net reserves All outstanding liabilities prior to 2008, net of reinsurance 74,903 F-42 $ 282,983 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 9. Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses (continued) Diversified Reinsurance: Excess of Loss - Other Liability including Umbrella The coverages in this category are written on an occurrence basis. The umbrella class of business is primarily written for small to medium sized regional and some super regional companies on either a stand-alone basis or in support of a treaty covering other exposures. The other liabilities class of business also includes general liability. Most business is from regional companies which include coverage for artisan contractors, but higher severity exposures, such as heavy products liability or completed operations exposures are typically avoided. Professional, Directors and Officers and Errors and Omissions exposures are also typically avoided. This category is composed of excess of loss Other Liability including umbrella business that is either part of a multi-line or an excess of liability or umbrella only excess of loss treaty or, occasionally, a facultative certificate. Facultative certificates are policies written to cover individually underwritten and priced specific risks for a ceding company. The majority of this business is written as part of a treaty where the Company underwrites the ceding company but not each individual risk. Reinsurance is used to limit the Company’s exposure when higher treaty limits are written. Excess other liability and umbrella exposures can have long claim payment and reporting patterns, even with the relatively modest limits written. Our initial underwriting year loss projections are generally based on the ELR method, derived either from account pricing analyses or historical performance metrics. Transitions to the BF method may take a few years, but are typically faster than for workers' compensation. Diversified Reinsurance - Other Liability - XOL For the Year Ended December 31, Accident Year: 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total For the Year Ended December 31, Accident Year: 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance At December 31, 2017 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total IBNR (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) $ 29,961 $ 29,052 $ 29,362 $ 30,086 $ 29,659 $ 30,336 $ 30,374 $ 25,801 25,939 34,374 23,927 23,157 35,463 35,609 24,070 20,348 33,085 36,096 42,600 23,541 19,736 29,281 30,291 40,698 43,305 25,574 20,399 28,843 31,509 38,331 46,021 31,791 24,889 20,896 27,490 30,073 38,548 48,809 31,282 32,657 26,281 21,204 27,936 30,884 40,319 52,737 33,377 30,190 24,089 1,163 836 1,429 953 2,473 12,947 12,655 13,916 15,994 49,695 $ 317,391 $ 112,061 Cumulative paid losses and LAE, net of reinsurance 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) $ 18,230 $ 21,186 $ 23,528 $ 25,002 $ 27,076 $ 27,694 $ 28,383 8,850 6,430 3,694 13,035 9,751 8,288 3,385 16,025 11,995 12,480 9,841 6,253 18,209 15,513 17,181 12,140 13,086 5,321 20,522 17,221 19,348 15,469 20,111 24,146 10,489 22,722 18,281 24,742 23,662 24,665 33,013 17,312 10,552 24,558 19,543 25,988 25,976 26,998 39,339 21,118 15,441 12,059 $ 239,403 $ 77,988 Total net reserves F-43 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 9. Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses (continued) Diversified Reinsurance: Accident and Health The A&H class of business specialize in reinsuring employer medical stop loss and other A&H lines. The majority of the portfolio is medical stop loss, however, there is expertise to selectively write accident, disability and other ancillary A&H products. Our initial underwriting year loss projections are generally based on the ELR method, derived either from account pricing analyses or historical performance metrics. Payment and reporting patterns are very short-tailed, with most claims completely paid within 18 months of the underlying policy effective date. The movement away from the ELR to BF or LD methods typically happens very rapidly. Diversified Reinsurance - A&H For the Year Ended December 31, Accident Year: 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total For the Year Ended December 31, Accident Year: 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Total net reserves Incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance At December 31, 2017 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total IBNR (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) $ 11,153 80,424 $ 11,147 79,810 $ 11,133 79,604 $ 11,111 79,601 $ 11,106 79,666 $ 11,106 79,657 $ 11,106 79,645 $ 43,582 31,461 43,271 32,302 29,270 43,048 32,003 31,725 24,995 43,281 31,994 31,860 26,171 27,851 43,366 31,999 31,816 23,751 28,839 39,768 43,366 31,999 31,815 23,558 25,750 42,209 53,164 43,364 31,962 31,811 23,535 26,223 38,493 52,983 63,328 $ 402,450 $ — 1 — 9 10 — 493 466 17,376 11,704 30,059 Cumulative paid losses and LAE, net of reinsurance 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) $ 11,145 $ 11,142 $ 11,128 $ 11,106 $ 11,106 $ 11,106 $ 11,106 79,918 33,498 8,924 79,776 42,809 24,105 7,407 79,634 42,995 31,837 23,362 6,246 79,432 43,095 31,915 31,733 17,710 8,001 79,654 43,365 31,990 31,824 23,125 16,909 8,170 79,640 43,365 31,959 31,821 23,542 25,009 29,251 12,974 79,644 43,364 31,953 31,800 23,535 25,713 37,869 32,699 23,659 $ 341,342 $ 61,108 F-44 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 9. Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses (continued) Diversified Reinsurance - International The international business written by our IIS team is mainly proportional treaty business, a significant portion of which is Personal Auto quota share but also comprises credit life quota share. Life and personal accident business is also written on a direct basis by Maiden LF. Maiden works with insurance partners, automobile manufacturers and their related credit providers and other organizations to design and implement insurance programs in both auto distribution-related and other consumer insurance products. For the auto quota share exposure, our initial underwriting year loss projections are generally based on the ELR method, derived from account pricing analyses. Payment and reporting patterns are short-tailed, and the movement away from the ELR to BF or LD methods typically happens very rapidly. Credit life reserves are primarily a function of reporting lag, typically only one or several months on average. The reserves are calculated using a FS methodology, where the frequency is a function of the average claims lag and the average per claims severity. Diversified Reinsurance - International For the Year Ended December 31, Incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance At December 31, 2017 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total IBNR Accident Year: (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total For the Year Ended December 31, Accident Year: 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Total net reserves $ 84,588 $ 84,206 $ 84,115 $ 83,760 $ 81,873 $ 84,095 $ 86,237 $ 53,773 52,314 53,888 52,316 52,141 48,082 52,537 52,487 53,708 45,402 52,488 52,629 55,168 51,681 45,693 52,305 52,705 54,687 51,614 47,228 41,231 52,714 52,976 55,323 51,529 47,792 43,310 39,459 $ 429,340 $ (616) (25) 90 249 855 (1,102) 1,718 12,339 13,508 Cumulative paid losses and LAE, net of reinsurance 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) $ 36,609 $ 46,130 $ 51,165 $ 52,964 $ 54,664 $ 56,286 $ 57,886 26,316 48,729 25,533 50,506 43,510 26,056 51,869 46,136 46,827 25,391 52,320 47,336 49,544 44,970 23,259 52,564 47,688 50,998 47,434 42,044 24,023 52,714 48,288 51,491 48,757 44,258 39,033 20,522 $ 362,949 $ 66,391 The following tables represent information on the Company's incurred losses and LAE and cumulative paid losses and LAE, both net of reinsurance, by significant line of business since 2011 for our AmTrust Reinsurance segment. All data shown for the AmTrust in the tables that follow are from the Company’s quota share contracts with AmTrust, both the multi-year Reinsurance Agreement and the annually renewable European Hospital Liability Quota Share contract. AmTrust purchases significant reinsurance for losses above $10 million covered by the Reinsurance Agreement. The Company’s share of AmTrust’s loss net of reinsurance in the Reinsurance Agreement is 40%. F-45 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 9. Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses (continued) AmTrust Reinsurance: Workers’ Compensation This reserve class consists of the Workers’ Compensation portion of the quota share Reinsurance Agreement. The business is written in the U.S. by AmTrust from their Small Commercial Business and their Specialty Program business units. AmTrust’s Small Commercial Business unit focuses on writing smaller, niche workers' compensation exposures in generally low-hazard occupations. Workers’ Compensation business written in the Specialty Program unit is typically part of programs consisting of multiple lines of business. The business is produced by managing general agents with AmTrust regularly adding new programs and terminating or renegotiating unprofitable ones. Our initial underwriting year loss projections are generally based on the ELR method, derived from historical performance after the consideration of loss and premium trends. Since it is proportional exposure, and due to the size and the classes of business insured by AmTrust, this reserving class is much shorter tailed than a traditional workers compensation book, and the transition to the BF and the LD methods happens relatively quickly, within the first several years. AmTrust Reinsurance Workers' Compensation For the Year Ended December 31, Accident Year: 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total For the Year Ended December 31, Accident Year: 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance At December 31, 2017 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total IBNR (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) $ 80,800 $ 81,493 $ 82,438 $ 81,240 $ 82,301 $ 83,039 $ 83,622 $ 102,240 106,799 104,923 102,245 113,880 125,549 136,960 103,864 118,209 130,712 168,016 237,019 109,213 120,243 132,728 173,946 245,765 379,589 106,204 125,020 133,995 171,040 238,392 365,515 474,140 105,901 124,073 133,916 172,692 242,447 382,260 474,212 528,906 107,165 123,968 135,379 181,616 261,915 419,748 526,269 568,006 615,957 83 1,418 1,835 1,411 5,141 11,293 24,366 59,563 88,243 285,521 $3,023,645 $ 478,874 Cumulative paid losses and LAE, net of reinsurance 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) $ 68,400 $ 72,823 $ 76,018 $ 77,370 $ 78,161 $ 79,230 $ 81,159 71,963 61,322 33,089 83,464 82,614 69,357 45,030 89,462 95,120 91,414 88,382 56,249 93,425 103,280 105,584 119,059 121,182 69,512 96,396 108,171 114,107 138,706 168,785 189,954 86,695 98,811 114,639 115,966 150,543 199,300 268,467 246,616 110,051 100,103 115,014 122,579 158,807 216,527 321,258 338,642 284,501 111,508 $1,850,098 617 $1,174,164 Total net reserves All outstanding liabilities prior to 2008, net of reinsurance F-46 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 9. Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses (continued) AmTrust Reinsurance: General Liability This reserve class consists of the General Liability portion of the Reinsurance Agreement. The business is written in the U.S. by AmTrust from their Small Commercial Business and Specialty Program segments. The Small Commercial Business unit focuses on writing smaller, niche business typically underserved by the broader insurance market, which typically have limits of $1,000. General Liability business written in the Small Commercial business unit grew substantially following AmTrust’s renewal rights acquisition in 2014. Specialty Program business may contain a mix of exposures from retail operations, contractors, manufacturer, and other premises. Our initial underwriting year loss projections are generally based on the ELR method, derived from historical performance after the consideration of loss and premium trends. This proportional exposure is relatively short tailed, and the transition to the BF and the LD methods happens relatively quickly, within the first several years. AmTrust Reinsurance General Liability For the Year Ended December 31, Accident Year: 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total For the Year Ended December 31, Accident Year: 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance At December 31, 2017 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total IBNR (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) $ 28,786 $ 31,921 $ 33,051 $ 33,792 $ 34,169 $ 35,985 $ 36,627 $ 19,311 15,783 11,334 28,384 28,850 24,731 21,281 29,123 34,761 35,628 33,445 42,021 30,902 36,455 40,557 42,450 43,116 65,469 32,418 38,536 42,100 48,851 66,869 66,558 118,111 34,040 38,298 45,303 50,800 68,641 77,930 95,766 98,149 34,863 41,597 49,338 55,991 79,731 99,873 122,942 114,864 116,158 274 271 1,003 2,291 2,715 5,476 16,909 30,023 58,221 86,190 $ 751,984 $ 203,373 Cumulative paid losses and LAE, net of reinsurance 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) (Unaudited) $ 20,935 $ 26,288 $ 29,384 $ 32,849 $ 32,423 $ 32,765 $ 34,935 7,840 5,140 2,813 13,904 11,187 6,072 5,084 19,727 19,010 12,158 13,224 4,996 24,298 26,429 22,963 18,020 10,226 3,503 28,312 30,948 31,619 29,752 32,249 24,581 20,849 30,924 34,125 39,350 40,864 44,698 36,026 33,963 6,402 32,878 37,317 41,257 45,775 58,377 57,678 52,350 21,959 6,967 $ 389,493 251 $ 362,742 Total net reserves All outstanding liabilities prior to 2008, net of reinsurance F-47 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 9. Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses (continued) AmTrust Reinsurance: Commercial Auto Liability Commercial Auto Liability is written in the U.S. and included in the Small Commercial Business and Specialty Program segments. The Small Commercial Business unit focuses on writing smaller, niche business typically underserved by the broader insurance market, and policies typically have limits of $1,000. Auto Liability business written in the Small Commercial business unit grew substantially following AmTrust’s renewal rights acquisition in 2014. Commercial Auto business written in the Specialty Program unit is typically part of programs consisting of multiple lines of business. Our initial underwriting year loss projections are generally based on the ELR method, derived from historical performance after the consideration of loss and premium trends. This proportional exposure is relatively short tailed, and the transition to the BF and the LD methods happens relatively quickly, within the first several years. AmTrust Reinsurance Commercial Auto Liability For the Year Ended December 31, Accident Year: 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total For the Year Ended December 31, Accident Year: 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Total net reserves Incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance At December 31, 2017 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total IBNR (Unaudited) $ 29,890 22,183 26,239 16,193 (Unaudited) $ 32,769 26,275 33,457 24,292 20,863 (Unaudited) $ 33,700 28,551 37,154 29,577 32,691 33,473 (Unaudited) $ 34,522 30,812 38,043 32,578 40,076 44,771 47,525 (Unaudited) $ 34,584 31,024 40,193 33,839 44,812 50,647 55,023 66,967 (Unaudited) $ 35,975 30,468 40,523 34,790 48,116 59,702 73,966 92,955 121,828 $ 35,521 30,919 42,146 36,149 46,150 63,162 82,427 106,560 118,210 156,575 $ 717,819 $ 179 788 2,093 2,286 110 1,588 3,346 17,881 30,881 90,420 $ 149,572 Cumulative paid losses and LAE, net of reinsurance 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 (Unaudited) $ 25,207 14,532 14,203 5,721 (Unaudited) $ 29,386 18,736 21,050 12,333 6,693 (Unaudited) $ 30,975 22,959 28,602 18,813 14,979 8,267 (Unaudited) $ 32,643 26,975 34,855 25,808 26,508 19,865 8,450 (Unaudited) $ 33,536 29,226 37,734 29,769 35,460 34,379 22,858 13,102 (Unaudited) $ 34,074 29,829 39,413 32,362 43,745 48,122 42,960 39,179 19,071 All outstanding liabilities prior to 2008, net of reinsurance $ 34,803 29,842 39,750 33,130 44,165 57,349 64,459 62,945 48,595 26,863 $ 441,901 330 $ 276,248 F-48 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 9. Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses (continued) AmTrust Reinsurance: European Hospital Liability AmTrust entered this line of business in Italy in 2010 when it believed there were significant opportunities in what had traditionally been an under-performing market. European Hospital Liability policies are written on a claim made basis. Maiden wrote a separate annually renewable contract covering this exposure a year later. It is not part of the Reinsurance Agreement. Currently, most exposure remains in Italy with a modest amount of other European exposure. The European Hospital Liability Quota Share exposure results in many instances where claims are eventually closed with no liability. As a claims made exposure, there is also minimal to no "tail" that would result in IBNR. The net result is a significant amount of negative IBNR accounting for claims with case reserves established that are expected to be closed with no payment. Our initial underwriting year loss projections are generally based on the ELR method, derived from historical performance after the consideration of loss and premium trends. Loss reporting for this line is unique, as a large proportion of claims are initially reserved but eventually closed with no payment, as the insurer is found to have no liability after investigation of the fundamentals of the claim. In addition, the underlying insurance policies we assume are both per claims and aggregate. For these reasons, the LD method is not typically employed in the estimate of loss. After the first several years, we utilize a FS methodology; frequency is estimated on a reported claim basis and adjusted for an estimate of the proportion of claims which will close with no payment, while severity is estimated on both a gross and net of deductible basis. AmTrust Reinsurance European Hospital Liability For the Year Ended December 31, Accident Year: 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total For the Year Ended December 31, Accident Year: 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Total net reserves Incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance At December 31, 2017 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total IBNR (Unaudited) $ 52,759 (Unaudited) $ 24,644 84,708 (Unaudited) $ 38,147 86,334 52,045 (Unaudited) $ 52,706 85,497 65,386 54,147 (Unaudited) $ 50,134 109,629 68,208 57,017 50,481 (Unaudited) $ 69,034 98,068 89,607 61,072 49,011 47,264 $ 66,939 92,858 81,933 67,954 63,813 54,411 43,512 $ 471,420 $ 4,607 (17,642) (16,629) (9,999) 3,546 5,336 18,423 $ (12,358) Cumulative paid losses and LAE, net of reinsurance 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 (Unaudited) 1,165 $ (Unaudited) 4,614 $ 5,106 (Unaudited) $ 13,615 16,324 3,172 (Unaudited) $ 24,985 37,152 15,958 4,465 (Unaudited) $ 30,563 48,389 27,456 12,578 3,687 (Unaudited) $ 37,974 62,213 41,892 26,145 11,726 3,805 $ 43,935 73,357 52,662 37,212 24,209 11,303 1,358 $ 244,036 $ 227,384 F-49 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 9. Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses (continued) AmTrust Reinsurance: All Other Lines This category includes all lines except Workers' Compensation, General Liability and Commercial Auto from the AmTrust Small Business Commercial and Specialty Program Divisions. The predominant exposures are property and auto physical damage. AmTrust Reinsurance All Other Lines Incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses, net of reinsurance At December 31, 2017 For the Year Ended December 31, Accident Year: 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total For the Year Ended December 31, Accident Year: 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total Total net reserves 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Total IBNR (Unaudited) $ 27,630 12,516 14,440 18,822 (Unaudited) $ 28,724 20,349 15,182 19,948 14,697 (Unaudited) $ 28,715 11,959 24,718 26,343 18,443 17,806 (Unaudited) $ 29,149 13,329 15,484 27,509 19,426 17,630 20,597 (Unaudited) $ 29,237 14,309 16,078 22,359 21,898 28,058 25,268 52,706 (Unaudited) $ 29,070 14,492 16,105 22,616 18,673 22,918 26,021 54,857 79,654 $ 29,576 16,088 17,071 23,376 19,850 21,313 24,958 49,631 74,948 104,637 $ 381,448 $ $ 75 663 1,110 769 1,430 961 2,938 8,098 31 35,063 51,138 Cumulative paid losses and LAE, net of reinsurance 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 (Unaudited) $ 25,776 7,891 12,373 13,840 (Unaudited) $ 29,710 8,084 12,332 16,424 10,308 (Unaudited) $ 29,900 8,743 13,012 17,571 14,031 11,877 (Unaudited) $ 31,217 11,093 15,375 21,279 16,033 15,997 12,028 (Unaudited) $ 29,388 13,105 15,748 22,044 16,936 17,509 20,277 28,929 (Unaudited) $ 29,177 13,870 16,058 22,715 17,946 20,258 20,940 45,208 42,795 All outstanding liabilities prior to 2008, net of reinsurance $ 30,833 15,224 16,919 23,892 18,205 20,456 22,018 42,631 69,805 48,903 $ 308,886 2 $ 72,564 F-50 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 9. Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses (continued) Reconciliation of Development Tables to Consolidated Balance Sheet The following table represents a reconciliation of the net incurred and paid claims development tables to the reserve for loss and LAE in the Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2017: As at December 31, 2017 Total Net Reserves Reinsurance Recoverables on unpaid claims Total Gross Reserves $ 79,354 $ 2,101 $ Diversified Reinsurance Property - Pro-rata Casualty Personal Auto - Pro-rata Casualty Commercial Auto - Pro-rata Property - XOL Commercial Auto - XOL Workers' Compensation - XOL Other Liability - XOL A&H International Total Other Diversified Total Diversified Reinsurance - Segment AmTrust Reinsurance Workers' Compensation General Liability Commercial Auto Liability European Hospital Liability All Other Lines Total Other reconciling items Total AmTrust Reinsurance - Segment Other Total reserves and LAE 83,466 125,094 67,887 198,621 282,983 77,988 61,108 66,391 1,042,892 99,851 1,142,743 1,174,164 362,742 276,248 227,384 72,564 2,113,102 155,048 2,268,150 13,438 1,592 — — — 25,446 — 2,051 44,628 — 81,455 96,904 126,686 67,887 198,621 282,983 103,434 61,108 68,442 1,087,520 99,851 44,628 1,187,371 — — 16,991 — — 16,991 5,840 22,831 1,174,164 362,742 293,239 227,384 72,564 2,130,093 160,888 2,290,981 18,744 50,152 68,896 $ 3,429,637 $ 117,611 $ 3,547,248 F-51 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 9. Reserve for Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses (continued) b) Claims duration disclosure The following unaudited supplementary information represents the average annual percentage payout of net loss and LAE by age, net of reinsurance, for both our reportable segments at December 31, 2017: Diversified Reinsurance Property - Pro-rata Casualty Personal Auto - Pro-rata Casualty Commercial Auto - Pro-rata Property XOL Commercial Auto XOL Workers' Compensation XOL Other Liability - XOL Accident & Health International AmTrust Reinsurance Workers' Compensation General Liability Commercial Auto Liability European Hospital Liability All other lines Average annual payout of incurred claims by age, net of reinsurance Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 41.1% 28.0% 19.8% 6.4% 2.0 % 1.2 % 62.0% 15.8% 16.3% 4.3% 0.4 % 0.8 % 12.0% 15.8% 16.9% 21.5% 12.9 % 8.4 % 31.0% 35.7% 16.7% 6.0% 3.8 % 2.9 % 0.8% 0.1% 8.1% 1.6% 3.1% 4.8% 9.0% 20.2% 22.2% 20.7 % 9.0 % 11.3% 5.2% 9.4% 8.0% 5.5 % 0.7 % 21.6% 19.3% 12.5% 10.3% 7.0 % 15.6 % 28.1% 42.2% 28.1% 1.1% 0.5 % (0.1)% 49.9% 37.4% 4.1% 2.2% 0.5 % 1.3 % 20.2% 27.5% 17.5% 11.1% 6.1 % 3.3 % 7.6% 12.2% 14.9% 19.4% 17.3 % 11.1 % 14.2% 20.3% 21.5% 19.7% 14.0 % 6.6 % 4.8% 11.9% 17.9% 15.7% 12.1 % 11.5 % 53.9% 25.2% 3.2% 7.1% 6.8 % 3.6 % 0.6% 6.8% —% 4.6% 3.4% 7.8% 5.0% 8.9% 5.1% The average annual payout of incurred claims by age, net of reinsurance, is calculated using the amount of claims paid in each development year and is compared with the estimated incurred claims as of the most recent period presented. F-52 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 10. Related Party Transactions The Founding Shareholders of the Company are Michael Karfunkel, George Karfunkel and Barry Zyskind. Michael Karfunkel passed away on April 27, 2016. Based on each individual's most recent public filing, Leah Karfunkel (wife of Michael Karfunkel) owns or controls approximately 8.2% of the outstanding shares of the Company and Barry Zyskind (the Company's non-executive chairman) owns or controls approximately 7.7% of the outstanding shares of the Company. George Karfunkel now owns or controls less than 5.0% of the outstanding shares of the Company as at December 31, 2017 so there is no longer a public filing requirement. Leah Karfunkel and George Karfunkel are directors of AmTrust, and Barry Zyskind is the president, CEO and chairman of AmTrust. Leah Karfunkel, George Karfunkel and Barry Zyskind own or control approximately 42.7% of the outstanding shares of AmTrust. AmTrust owns 1.6% of the issued and outstanding shares of National General Holdings Corporation ("NGHC"), and Leah Karfunkel and the Michael Karfunkel 2005 Family Trust (which is controlled by Leah Karfunkel) owns 41.8% of the outstanding common shares of NGHC. Barry Zyskind is the non-executive chairman of NGHC. AmTrust The following describes transactions between the Company and AmTrust: AmTrust Quota Share Reinsurance Agreement Effective July 1, 2007, the Company and AmTrust entered into a master agreement, as amended (the "Master Agreement"), by which they caused Maiden Bermuda, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, and AmTrust's Bermuda reinsurance subsidiary, AmTrust International Insurance, Ltd. ("AII"), to enter into the Reinsurance Agreement by which AII retrocedes to Maiden Bermuda an amount equal to 40% of the premium written by subsidiaries of AmTrust, net of the cost of unaffiliated inuring reinsurance and 40% of losses. The Master Agreement further provided that AII receives a ceding commission of 31% of ceded written premiums. On June 11, 2008, Maiden Bermuda and AII amended the Reinsurance Agreement to add Retail Commercial Package Business to the Covered Business. AII receives a ceding commission of 34.375% on Retail Commercial Package Business. On July 1, 2016 the agreement was renewed through June 30, 2019. The agreement automatically renews for successive three- year periods thereafter unless AII or Maiden Bermuda elects to so terminate the Reinsurance Agreement by giving written notice to the other party not less than nine months prior to the expiration of any successive three-year period. Either party is entitled to terminate on thirty days' notice or less upon the occurrence of certain early termination events, which include a default in payment, insolvency, change in control of AII or Maiden Bermuda, run-off, or a reduction of 50% or more of the shareholders' equity of Maiden Bermuda or the combined shareholders' equity of AII and the AmTrust subsidiaries. In 2015, Maiden Bermuda and AII entered into an agreement to commute certain liabilities as of December 31, 2015. The commuted reserve value of $107,000, represents full and final settlement of all liabilities related to this business and as a result of this agreement, this business is no longer being ceded to Maiden Bermuda. Additionally, for the Specialty Program portion of Covered Business only, AII will be responsible for ultimate net loss otherwise recoverable from Maiden Bermuda to the extent that the loss ratio to Maiden Bermuda, which shall be determined on an inception to date basis from July 1, 2007 through the date of calculation, is between 81.5% and 95%. Above and below the defined corridor, Maiden Bermuda will continue to reinsure losses at its proportional 40% share per the Reinsurance Agreement. AmTrust European Hospital Liability Quota Share Agreement ("European Hospital Liability Quota Share") Effective April 1, 2011, Maiden Bermuda, entered into a quota share reinsurance contract with AmTrust Europe Limited ("AEL") and AmTrust International Underwriters Limited ("AIUL"), both wholly owned subsidiaries of AmTrust. Pursuant to the terms of the contract, Maiden Bermuda assumed 40% of the premiums and losses related to policies classified as European Hospital Liability, including associated liability coverages and policies covering physician defense costs, written or renewed on or after April 1, 2011. The contract also covers policies written or renewed on or before March 31, 2011, but only with respect to losses that occur, accrue or arise on or after April 1, 2011. The maximum limit of liability attaching shall be €5,000 (€10,000 effective January 1, 2012) or currency equivalent (on a 100% basis) per original claim for any one original policy. Maiden Bermuda will pay a ceding commission of 5%. The agreement is renewed through March 31, 2019 and can be terminated at any April 1 by either party on four months notice. Effective July 1, 2016, the contract was amended such that Maiden Bermuda assumes from AEL 32.5% of the premiums and losses of all policies written or renewed on or after July 1, 2016 until June 30, 2017 and 20% of all policies written or renewed on or after July 1, 2017. The table below shows the effect of both of these quota share arrangements with AmTrust on the Company's results of operations for the three years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively: For the Year Ended December 31, Gross and net premiums written Net premiums earned Net loss and loss adjustment expenses Commission and other acquisition expenses 2017 2016 2015 $ 1,993,478 $ 2,006,646 $ 1,885,974 1,969,907 1,931,656 1,717,989 (1,549,064) (630,376) (1,287,035) (614,882) (1,094,880) (539,671) F-53 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 10. Related Party Transactions (continued) Other Reinsurance Agreements Effective September 1, 2010, the Company, through a subsidiary, entered into a quota share reinsurance agreement with Technology Insurance Company, Inc. ("Technology"), a subsidiary of AmTrust. Under the agreement, we ceded (a) 90% of its gross liability written under the Open Lending Program ("OPL") and (b) 100% of its surplus lines general liability business under the Naxos Avondale Specialty Casualty Program ("NAXS"). Our involvement is limited to certain states where Technology was not fully licensed. The agreement also provides that we receive a ceding commission of 5% of ceded written premiums. The OPL program was terminated on December 31, 2011, on a run-off basis, and the NAXS program was terminated on October 31, 2012. We recorded $4 of ceded premiums for the year ended December 31, 2017 (2016 - $19, 2015 - $68). Effective April 1, 2012, the Company, through a subsidiary, entered into a reinsurance agreement with AmTrust's wholly owned subsidiary, AmTrust North America, Inc. ("AmTrust NA"). We indemnify AmTrust NA, on an excess of loss basis, as a result of losses occurring on AmTrust NA's new and renewal policies relating to the lines of business classified as Automobile Liability by AmTrust NA in its annual statement utilizing the specific underwriting guidelines defined in the reinsurance agreement. AmTrust NA shall retain the first $1,000 of loss, per any one policy or per any one loss occurrence. This agreement has a term of one year and automatically renews annually unless terminated pursuant to the terms of the agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2017, under the terms of this agreement, we have recorded net premiums earned of approximately $1,520 (2016 - $1,139, 2015 - $673) and commission expense of $335 (2016 - $295, 2015 -$166). Collateral provided to AmTrust a) AmTrust Quota Share Reinsurance Agreement In order to provide AmTrust's U.S. insurance subsidiaries with credit for reinsurance on their statutory financial statements, AII, as the direct reinsurer of the AmTrust's insurance subsidiaries, has established trust accounts ("Trust Accounts") for their benefit. Maiden Bermuda has agreed to provide appropriate collateral to secure its proportional share under the Reinsurance Agreement of AII's obligations to the AmTrust subsidiaries to whom AII is required to provide collateral. This collateral may be in the form of (a) assets loaned by Maiden Bermuda to AII for deposit into the Trust Accounts, pursuant to a loan agreement between those parties, (b) assets transferred by Maiden Bermuda for deposit into the Trust Accounts, (c) a letter of credit obtained by Maiden Bermuda and delivered to an AmTrust subsidiary on AII's behalf, or (d) premiums withheld by an AmTrust subsidiary at Maiden Bermuda's request in lieu of remitting such premiums to AII. Maiden Bermuda may provide any or a combination of these forms of collateral, provided that the aggregate value thereof equals Maiden Bermuda's proportionate share of its obligations under the Reinsurance Agreement with AII. Maiden Bermuda satisfied its collateral requirements under the Reinsurance Agreement with AII as follows: • by lending funds in the amount of $167,975 at December 31, 2017 and 2016 pursuant to a loan agreement entered into between those parties. Advances under the loan, which were made in three separate tranches of $113,542 (December 18, 2007), $20,193 (April 11, 2008) and $34,240 (June 23, 2008), are secured by promissory notes. Effective December 18, 2017, the maturity date with respect to each advance shall be the earliest of (i) June 30, 2019, (ii) such time as there are no remaining obligations due to AmTrust under the Reinsurance Agreement in respect of which such advance was originally made or (iii) such time as AII is no longer required to secure its proportionate share of such obligations. This loan was assigned by AII to AmTrust effective December 31, 2014 and is carried at cost. Effective December 18, 2017, interest is payable at a rate equivalent to the Federal Funds Effective Rate ("Fed Funds") plus 200 basis points per annum. Prior to that date, the interest was payable at a rate equivalent to one-month LIBOR plus 90 basis points per annum; and • effective December 1, 2008, the Company entered into a Reinsurer Trust Assets Collateral agreement to provide to AII sufficient collateral to secure its proportional share of AII's obligations to the U.S. AmTrust subsidiaries. The amount of the collateral, at December 31, 2017 was approximately $3,328,757 (2016 - $2,766,032) and the accrued interest was $20,830 (2016 - $20,420). Please refer to "Note 4. (e) Investments" for additional information. b) European Hospital Liability Quota Share AEL requested that Maiden Bermuda provide collateral to secure its proportional share under the European Hospital Liability Quota Share agreement. Please refer to "Note 4. (e) Investments" for additional information. Brokerage Agreement Effective July 1, 2007, the Company entered into a reinsurance brokerage agreement with AII Reinsurance Broker Ltd. ("AIIB"), a wholly owned subsidiary of AmTrust. Pursuant to the brokerage agreement, AIIB provides brokerage services relating to the Reinsurance Agreement and the European Hospital Liability Quota Share agreement for a fee equal to 1.25% of the premium assumed. The brokerage fee is payable in consideration of AIIB's brokerage services. AIIB is not the Company's exclusive broker. The agreement may be terminated upon 30 days written notice by either party. Maiden Bermuda recorded approximately $24,624 (2016 - $24,146, 2015 - $21,475) of reinsurance brokerage expense for the year ended December 31, 2017, which is presented as part of the commission and other acquisition expenses in the consolidated statements of income, and deferred reinsurance brokerage of $14,741 (2016 - $14,395) at December 31, 2017 as a result of this agreement. F-54 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 10. Related Party Transactions (continued) Asset Management Agreement Effective July 1, 2007, the Company entered into an asset management agreement with AII Insurance Management Limited ("AIIM"), a wholly owned subsidiary of AmTrust, pursuant to which AIIM has agreed to provide investment management services to the Company. AIIM provides investment management services for a quarterly fee of 0.0375% if the average value of the account for the previous calendar quarter is greater than $1 billion. The agreement may be terminated upon 30 days written notice by either party. The Company recorded approximately $7,474 (2016 - $6,925, 2015 - $6,057) of investment management fees for the year ended December 31, 2017, as a result of this agreement. Other The Company entered into time sharing agreements for the lease of aircraft owned by AmTrust Underwriters, Inc. ("AUI"), a wholly owned subsidiary of AmTrust, and by AmTrust on March 1, 2011 and November 5, 2014, respectively. The agreements automatically renew for successive one-year terms unless terminated in accordance with the provisions of the agreements. Pursuant to the agreements, the Company will reimburse AUI and AmTrust for actual expenses incurred as allowed by Federal Aviation Regulations. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company recorded an expense of $39 (2016- $61, 2015 - $89) for the use of the aircraft. NGHC The following describes transactions between the Company and NGHC and its subsidiaries: NGHC Quota Share Reinsurance Agreement ("NGHC Quota Share") Maiden Bermuda, effective March 1, 2010, had a 50% participation in the NGHC Quota Share, by which it received 25% of net premiums of the personal lines automobile business and assumed 25% of the related net losses. On August 1, 2013, the Company received notice from NGHC of the termination of the NGHC Quota Share effective on that date. The Company and NGHC mutually agreed that the termination is on a run-off basis. Other Effective May 1, 2015, Maiden US entered into an agreement with several NGHC subsidiaries for medical excess of loss programs. This program covers employer aggregate and traditional specific medical stop loss policies underwritten by the Managing General Agent that they support. The NGHC companies covered under the treaty are Integon Indemnity Insurance Company, Integon National Insurance Company and National Health Insurance Company. This agreement expired on April 30, 2017. Upon expiration of this agreement, coverage remains in full force and effect on all assumed liability for policies in force on the date of expiration until expiration, cancellation or next anniversary date of such subject policies. The treaty limit of the aggregate medical stop loss is subject to a limit of $4,000 in excess of $1,000 any one insured person. The treaty limit on the traditional specific medical stop loss Layer 1 is subject to a limit of $1,000 in excess of $1,000 any one insured person; Layer 2 is subject to a limit of $3,000 in excess of $2,000 any one insured person and Layer 3 is subject to a limit of $5,000 in excess of $5,000 any one insured person. In addition to these limits, the Company shall cover extra contractual obligations arising under this agreement with a maximum liability of $2,000. Under these agreements, Maiden US recorded approximately $542 of premiums earned for the year ended December 31, 2017 (2016 - $442, 2015 - $25). F-55 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 11. Commitments, Contingencies and Concentrations a) Concentrations of Credit Risk At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company’s assets where significant concentrations of credit risk may exist include investments, cash and cash equivalents, loan to related party and reinsurance balances receivable. Please refer to "Note 8. Reinsurance" for additional information regarding the Company's credit risk exposure on its reinsurance counterparties. The Company manages concentration of credit risk in the investment portfolio through issuer and sector exposure limitations. The Company believes it bears minimal credit risk in its cash on deposit. The Company also monitors the credit risk related to the loan to related party and its reinsurance balances receivable, within which the largest balance is due from AmTrust. To mitigate credit risk, we generally have a contractual right of offset thereby allowing us to settle claims net of any premiums or loan receivable. The Company believes these balances will be fully collectible. b) Concentrations of Revenue During the year ended December 31, 2017, our gross premiums written from AmTrust accounted for $1,993,478 or 70.8% of our total gross premiums written (2016 – $2,006,646 or 70.9%, 2015 – $1,885,974 or 70.8%). c) Brokers We market our Diversified Reinsurance segment through a combination of third-party intermediaries and directly through our own marketing efforts. For the year ended December 31, 2017, 50.7% (2016 - 53.9%, 2015 - 54.6%) of our Diversified Reinsurance segment's gross premiums written was sourced through brokers. Our top three brokers represented approximately 31.9% of gross premiums written by our Diversified Reinsurance segment for the year ended December 31, 2017 (2016 - 34.6%, 2015 - 36.9%) and is comprised of Aon Benfield Inc. - 13.9% (2016 - 13.8%, 2015 - 17.3%), Marsh & McLennan Companies (including Guy Carpenter) - 11.6% (2016 - 11.9%, 2015 - 12.2%), and Risk & Insurance Services Consulting - 6.4% (Beach & Associates 2016 - 8.9%, U.S. RE Corporation - 2015 - 7.4%). d) Letters of Credit At December 31, 2017, we had letters of credit outstanding of $83,903 (2016 - $76,656). The letters of credit are for collateral purposes and are secured by cash and fixed maturities with a fair value of $114,172 (2016 - $108,786). e) Employment agreements The Company has entered into employment agreements with certain individuals. The employment agreements provide for option awards, executive benefits and severance payments under certain circumstances. f) Operating Lease Commitments The Company leases office space, an apartment, equipment and vehicles under operating leases expiring in various years through 2022. The Company's total rent expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $1,514 (2016 - $1,616, 2015 - $1,984). Future minimum lease payments at December 31, 2017 under non-cancellable operating leases for the next five years are approximately as follows: 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 December 31, 2017 $ $ 1,490 1,186 1,025 719 719 5,139 g) Other Commitments The Company has an unfunded commitment on its investment in limited partnerships of approximately $306 at December 31, 2017 (2016 - $463). The Company purchases retrocessional protection to limit certain exposures. The minimum deposit premiums are contractually due in advance on a quarterly basis. At December 31, 2017, the Company has an outstanding reinsurance purchase commitment of $1,305, all of which is due in 2018. There were no such commitments outstanding at December 31, 2016. h) Other Collateral In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into reinsurance agreements that may include terms which could require the Company to collateralize certain of its obligations. F-56 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 11. Commitments and Contingencies (continued) i) Deposit Insurance The Company maintains cash and cash equivalents balances at financial institutions in the U.S., Bermuda and other international jurisdictions. In the U.S., the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation secures accounts up to $250. In certain other international jurisdictions, there exist similar protections. Management monitors balances in excess of insured limits and believes they do not represent a significant credit risk to the Company. j) Legal Proceedings Except as noted below, the Company is not a party to any material legal proceedings. From time to time, the Company is subject to routine legal proceedings, including arbitrations, arising in the ordinary course of business. These legal proceedings generally relate to claims asserted by or against the Company in the ordinary course of insurance or reinsurance operations. Based on the Company's opinion, the eventual outcome of these legal proceedings is not expected to have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations. In April 2009, the Company learned that Bentzion S. Turin, the former Chief Operating Officer, General Counsel and Secretary of Maiden Holdings and Maiden Bermuda, sent a letter to the U.S. Department of Labor claiming that his employment with the Company was terminated in retaliation for corporate whistleblowing in violation of the whistleblower protection provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Mr. Turin alleged that he was terminated for raising concerns regarding corporate governance with respect to the negotiation of the terms of the Trust Preferred Securities Offering. He seeks reinstatement as Chief Operating Officer, General Counsel and Secretary of Maiden Holdings and Maiden Bermuda, back pay and legal fees incurred. On December 31, 2009, the U.S. Secretary of Labor found no reasonable cause for Mr. Turin’s claim and dismissed the complaint in its entirety. Mr. Turin objected to the Secretary's findings and requested a hearing before an administrative law judge in the U.S. Department of Labor. The Company moved to dismiss Mr. Turin's complaint, and its motion was granted by the Administrative Law Judge on June 30, 2011. On July 13, 2011, Mr. Turin filed a petition for review of the Administrative Law Judge's decision with the Administrative Review Board in the U.S. Department of Labor. On March 29, 2013, the Administrative Review Board reversed the dismissal of the complaint on procedural grounds, and remanded the case to the administrative law judge. The administrative hearing began in September 2014, and we expect the hearings to conclude in 2018. The Company believes that it had good and sufficient reasons for terminating Mr. Turin's employment and that the claim is without merit. The Company will continue to vigorously defend itself against this claim. k) Dividends declared On November 7, 2017, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the following quarterly dividend: Common shares Dividend per Share Payable on: Record date: $0.15 January 16, 2018 January 2, 2018 F-57 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 12. Earnings per Common Share The following is a summary of the elements used in calculating basic and diluted earnings per common share: For the Year Ended December 31, Numerator: Net (loss) income attributable to Maiden Dividends on preference shares – Series A, C and D Dividends on convertible preference shares – Series B Amount allocated to participating common shareholders(1) Numerator for basic EPS - net (loss) income allocated to Maiden common shareholders Potentially dilutive securities: Dividends on convertible preference shares – Series B(2) Numerator for diluted EPS - net (loss) income allocated to Maiden common shareholders after assumed conversion Denominator: Weighted average number of common shares – basic Potentially dilutive securities: Share options and restricted share units Convertible preference shares(2) Adjusted weighted average number of common shares and assumed conversions – diluted Basic (loss) earnings per share attributable to Maiden common shareholders: Diluted (loss) earnings per share attributable to Maiden common shareholders: 2017 2016 2015 $ (169,896) $ (29,156) — (23) $ 48,980 (24,785) (8,971) (7) 124,476 (12,375) (11,962) (52) (199,075) 15,217 100,087 — — 11,962 $ (199,075) $ 15,217 $ 112,049 85,678,232 77,534,860 73,478,544 — — 1,152,083 1,319,074 — 10,840,617 85,678,232 78,686,943 85,638,235 $ $ (2.32) $ (2.32) $ 0.20 0.19 $ $ 1.36 1.31 (1) This represents earnings allocated to the holders of non-vested restricted shares issued to the Company's employees under the 2007 Share Incentive Plan. The 2017 amount allocated to the holders of non-vested restricted shares excluded undistributed losses during the year. (2) The effect of mandatory convertible preference shares were excluded in the calculation of diluted EPS for the year ended December 31, 2016 (for the period that the convertible shares were outstanding) as they were anti-dilutive. On September 15, 2016, the Company's $165,000 mandatory convertible preference shares - Series B were automatically converted into 12,069,090 of the Company's common shares at a conversion rate of 3.6573 per preference share. Please refer to "Note 13. Shareholders' Equity" and "Note 14. Share Compensation and Pension Plans" of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, for the terms and conditions of each of these anti-dilutive instruments. At December 31, 2017, 1,688,010 share options and restricted share units (2016 – 24,000; 2015 – nil) were excluded from diluted earnings per common share because they were anti-dilutive. F-58 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 13. Shareholders’ Equity At December 31, 2017, the aggregate authorized share capital of the Company is 150,000,000 shares from which the Company has issued 87,730,054 common shares, of which 82,974,895 common shares are outstanding, and 18,600,000 preference shares, all of which are outstanding. The remaining 43,669,946 shares are undesignated at December 31, 2017. a) Common Shares The following table shows the summary of changes in the Company's common shares outstanding: For the Year Ended December 31, Outstanding shares – January 1 Mandatory conversion of preference shares – Series B Issuance of vested restricted shares and restricted share units Shares repurchased(1) Exercise of options Outstanding shares – December 31 2017 2016 2015 86,271,109 — 246,382 (3,705,256) 162,660 73,721,140 12,069,090 251,027 (35,258) 265,110 72,932,702 — 378,120 (46,458) 456,776 82,974,895 86,271,109 73,721,140 (1) The Company repurchased a total of 3,667,134 common shares under its share repurchase authorization. In addition, shares were repurchased from employees in respect of tax obligations arising from the vesting of restricted shares and performance based shares. See further details below in item (f). The Company's common shares have a par value of $0.01 per share. The holders of our common shares are entitled to receive dividends and are allocated one vote per common share, subject to downward adjustment under certain circumstances. b) Preference Shares – Series D On June 15, 2017, the Company issued and authorized a total of 6,000,000, 6.7% Preference Shares – Series D (the "Preference Shares - Series D"), par value $0.01 per share, at a price of $25 per preference share. The Company's total net proceeds from the offering was $144,942, after deducting issuance costs of $5,058, which were recognized as a reduction in additional paid-in capital. The Preference Shares – Series D have no stated maturity date and are redeemable in whole or in part at the sole option of the Company any time after June 15, 2022, subject to certain regulatory restrictions at a redemption price of $25 per preference share plus any declared and unpaid dividends, without accumulation of any undeclared dividends. Additionally, at any time prior to June 15, 2022, the Company may redeem all but not less than all of the Series D Preference Shares at a redemption price of $26 per share, plus declared and unpaid dividends, if any, to, but excluding, the date of redemption subject to certain conditions and regulatory approval. Dividends on the Preference Shares – Series D are non-cumulative. Consequently, in the event a dividend is not declared on the Preference Shares – Series D for any dividend period, holders of Preference Shares – Series D will not be entitled to receive a dividend for such period, and such undeclared dividend will not accrue and will not be payable. The holders of Preference Shares – Series D will be entitled to receive dividend payments only when, as and if declared by the Company's Board of Directors or a duly authorized committee of the Board of Directors. Any such dividends will be payable from, and including, the date of original issue on a non-cumulative basis, quarterly in arrears. To the extent declared, these dividends will accumulate, with respect to each dividend period, in an amount per share equal to 6.7% of the $25 liquidation preference per annum. During any dividend period, so long as any Preference Shares – Series D remain outstanding, unless the full dividends for the latest completed dividend period on all outstanding Preference Shares – Series D have been declared and paid, no dividend shall be paid or declared on the common shares. The holders of the Preference Shares – Series D have no voting rights other than the right to elect up to two directors if preference share dividends are not declared and paid for six or more dividend periods. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company declared and paid dividends on the Preference Shares – Series D of $5,025. c) Preference Shares – Series C On November 25, 2015, the Company issued and authorized a total of 6,600,000 7.125% Preference Shares – Series C (the "Preference Shares - Series C"), par value $0.01 per share, at a price of $25 per preference share. The Company's total net proceeds from the offering was $159,485, after deducting issuance costs of $5,515, which were recognized as a reduction in additional paid- in capital. The Preference Shares – Series C have no stated maturity date and are redeemable in whole or in part at the sole option of the Company any time after December 15, 2020 at a redemption price of $25 per preference share plus any declared and unpaid dividends, without accumulation of any undeclared dividends. Dividends on the Preference Shares – Series C are non-cumulative. Consequently, in the event a dividend is not declared on the Preference Shares – Series C for any dividend period, holders of Preference Shares – Series C will not be entitled to receive a dividend for such period, and such undeclared dividend will not accrue and will not be payable. The holders of Preference Shares – Series C will be entitled to receive dividend payments only when, as and if declared by the Company's Board of Directors or a duly authorized committee of the Board of Directors. Any such dividends will be payable from, and including, the date of original issue on a non-cumulative basis, quarterly in arrears. F-59 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 13. Shareholders’ Equity (continued) To the extent declared, these dividends will accumulate, with respect to each dividend period, in an amount per share equal to 7.125% of the $25 liquidation preference per annum. During any dividend period, so long as any Preference Shares – Series C remain outstanding, unless the full dividends for the latest completed dividend period on all outstanding Preference Shares – Series C have been declared and paid, no dividend shall be paid or declared on the common shares. The holders of the Preference Shares – Series C have no voting rights other than the right to elect up to two directors if preference share dividends are not declared and paid for six or more dividend periods. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company declared and paid dividends on the Preference Shares – Series C of $11,756 (2016 -$12,410, 2015 - $0). d) Mandatory Convertible Preference Shares – Series B In October 2013, the Company issued and authorized a total of 3,300,000 7.25% Mandatory Convertible Preference Shares – Series B (the "Preference Shares – Series B"), par value $0.01, at a price of $50 per preference share. The Company's total net proceeds from the offering was $159,675, after deducting issuance costs of $5,325, which were recognized as a reduction in additional paid-in capital. The Preference Shares – Series B were not redeemable. The Company paid cumulative dividends on each of the Preference Shares – Series B at a rate of 7.25% per annum on the initial liquidation preference of $50 per share (equivalent to $3.625 per annum per Preference Share – Series B or $0.90625 per quarter except on the initial payment date which was $0.745139). Dividends accrued and accumulated from the date of issuance and, to the extent that the Company had lawfully available funds to pay dividends and the Board of Directors declared a dividend payable, it paid dividends quarterly each year commencing on December 15, 2013, up to, and including, September 15, 2016 in cash. On September 15, 2016, each of the outstanding Preference Share – Series B were automatically converted into 12,069,090 of the Company's common shares at a conversion rate of $3.6573 per preference share based on the volume weighted average price per share of the Company’s common shares over the forty consecutive trading day period beginning on, and including, the forty- second scheduled trading day immediately preceding September 15, 2016 (the "final averaging period"). The mandatory conversion date is the third business day immediately following the last trading day of the final averaging period. The Company declared and paid dividends on the Preference Shares – Series B of $8,971 for the year ended December 31, 2016 (2015 - $11,962). e) Preference Shares - Series A On August 22, 2012, the Company issued and authorized a total of 6,000,000 8.25% Preference Shares – Series A (the "Preference Shares – Series A"), par value $0.01 per share, at a price of $25 per preference share. The Company's total net proceeds from the offering was $145,041, after deducting issuance costs of $4,959, which were recognized as a reduction in additional paid-in capital. The Preference Shares – Series A have no stated maturity date and are redeemable in whole or in part at the sole option of the Company any time after August 29, 2017 at a redemption price of $25 per preference share plus any declared and unpaid dividends, without accumulation of any undeclared dividends. Dividends on the Preference Shares – Series A are non-cumulative. Consequently, in the event a dividend is not declared on the Preference Shares – Series A for any dividend period, holders of Preference Shares – Series A will not be entitled to receive a dividend for such period, and such undeclared dividend will not accrue and will not be payable. The holders of Preference Shares – Series A will be entitled to receive dividend payments only when, as and if declared by the Company's Board of Directors or a duly authorized committee of the Board of Directors. Any such dividends will be payable from, and including, the date of original issue on a non-cumulative basis, quarterly in arrears. To the extent declared, these dividends will accumulate, with respect to each dividend period, in an amount per share equal to 8.25% of the $25 liquidation preference per annum. During any dividend period, so long as any Preference Shares – Series A remain outstanding, unless the full dividends for the latest completed dividend period on all outstanding Preference Shares – Series A have been declared and paid, no dividend shall be paid or declared on the common shares. The holders of the Preference Shares – Series A have no voting rights other than the right to elect up to two directors if preference share dividends are not declared and paid for six or more dividend periods. For the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company declared and paid dividends on the Preference Shares - Series A of $12,375 (2016 and 2015 - $12,375). f) Treasury Shares On February 21, 2017, the Company's Board of Directors approved the repurchase of up to $100,000 of the Company's common shares from time to time at market prices. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company repurchased a total of 3,667,134 common shares at an average price of $6.84 per share under its share repurchase authorization. As at December 31, 2017, the Company has a remaining authorization of $74,924 for share repurchases. In addition, during the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company repurchased a total of 38,122 (2016 - 35,258, 2015 - 46,458) shares at an average price per share of $15.06 (2016 - $13.33, 2015 - $14.09) from employees, which represent withholdings in respect of tax obligations on the vesting of restricted shares and performance based shares. F-60 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 13. Shareholders’ Equity (continued) g) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income The following table presents details about amounts reclassified from AOCI: Details about AOCI Components Unrealized (losses) gains on AFS securities Consolidated Statements of Income Line Item that Includes Reclassification For the Year Ended December 31, Net realized (losses) gains on investment Net impairment losses recognized in earnings Total before tax Income tax expense Total after tax 2017 2016 2015 $ $ 1,816 — 1,816 — 1,816 $ $ (576) $ — (576) — (576) $ 263 — 263 — 263 The following tables set forth financial information regarding the changes in the balances of each component of AOCI for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015: For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 Beginning balance Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications Amounts reclassified from AOCI to net income, net of tax Net current period other comprehensive income (loss) Ending balance Less: AOCI attributable to noncontrolling interest Ending balance, Maiden shareholders For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 Beginning balance Other comprehensive income before reclassifications Amounts reclassified from AOCI to net income, net of tax Net current period other comprehensive income Ending balance Less: AOCI attributable to noncontrolling interest Ending balance, Maiden shareholders For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 Beginning balance Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications Amounts reclassified from AOCI to net income, net of tax Net current period other comprehensive (loss) income Ending balance Less: AOCI attributable to noncontrolling interest Ending balance, Maiden shareholders F-61 Change in net unrealized gains on investment Foreign currency translation adjustments $ (20,716) $ 44,421 (1,816) 42,605 21,889 — $ 21,889 $ $ 35,604 (44,187) — (44,187) (8,583) (48) (8,535) $ Change in net unrealized gains on investment Foreign currency translation adjustments $ $ (54,112) $ 32,820 576 33,396 (20,716) — (20,716) $ 30,231 $ 5,373 — 5,373 35,604 (109) 35,713 $ Change in net unrealized gains on investment Foreign currency translation adjustments $ $ $ 78,579 (132,428) (263) (132,691) (54,112) — (54,112) $ 16,665 $ 13,566 — 13,566 30,231 (114) 30,345 $ Total 14,888 234 (1,816) (1,582) 13,306 (48) 13,354 Total (23,881) 38,193 576 38,769 14,888 (109) 14,997 Total 95,244 (118,862) (263) (119,125) (23,881) (114) (23,767) MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 14. Share Compensation and Pension Plans The Company’s Amended and Restated 2007 Share Incentive Plan (the "Plan"), provides for grants of options, restricted shares and restricted share units. New shares are issued upon exercise of options and vesting of restricted shares and share units. The total number of common shares currently reserved for issuance under the Plan is 10,000,000. The Plan is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the "Committee"). Share Options Exercise prices of options are established at or above the fair market value of the Company’s common shares at the date of grant. Under the Plan, unless otherwise determined by the Committee and provided in an award agreement, 25% of the options will become exercisable on the first anniversary of the grant date, with an additional 6.25% of the options vesting each quarter thereafter based on the grantee’s continued employment over a four-year period, and will expire ten years after grant date. The fair value of each option grant is separately estimated for each vesting date. The fair value of each option is amortized into compensation expense on a straight-line basis between the grant date for the award and each vesting date. The Company has estimated the fair value of all share option awards on the date of the grant by applying the Black-Scholes-Merton multiple-option pricing valuation model. The application of this valuation model involves assumptions that are judgmental and highly sensitive in the determination of compensation expense. There were no options granted in 2017. The key assumptions used in determining the fair value of options granted in 2016 and 2015 and a summary of the methodology applied to develop each assumption were as follows: Assumptions: Volatility Risk-free interest rate Weighted average expected lives in years Forfeiture rate Dividend yield rate 2016 2015 28.70% 1.67% 37.60% 1.55% 5.5 years 5.5 years 1.66% 3.55% 2.16% 4.05% Expected Price Volatility — This is a measure of the amount by which a price has fluctuated or is expected to fluctuate. Maiden began trading on May 6, 2008, thus, has a maximum of 8.6 years trading history for estimating historical volatility. Maiden's expected volatility for 2016 of 28.7% was based on the average of the implied volatility and its historical volatility, commensurate with the expected life of the options. Risk-Free Interest Rate — This is based on the yields on U.S. Treasury constant maturity notes with a term equal to the expected life of the option. An increase in the risk-free interest rate will increase compensation expense. Expected Lives — This is the period of time over which the options granted are expected to remain outstanding giving consideration to vesting schedules, historical exercise and forfeiture patterns. The Company uses the simplified method outlined in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin Codification Topic 14 (SAB 14) to estimate expected lives for options granted during the period as there is insufficient observed option exercise and forfeiture behavior from which to base an estimate of the expected life. Options granted have a maximum term of ten years. An increase in the expected life will increase compensation expense. Forfeiture Rate — This is the estimated percentage of options granted that are expected to be forfeited or cancelled before becoming fully vested. An increase in the forfeiture rate will decrease compensation expense. Dividend Yield — This is calculated by dividing the expected annual dividend by the share price of the Company at the valuation date. An increase in the dividend yield will decrease compensation expense. F-62 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 14. Share Compensation and Pension Plans (continued) The following table shows all options granted, exercised, forfeited and expired under the Plan for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015: Outstanding, December 31, 2014 Granted Exercised Expired Forfeited Outstanding, December 31, 2015 Granted Exercised Expired Outstanding, December 31, 2016 Exercised Expired Outstanding, December 31, 2017 Total exercisable at December 31, 2017 Number of Share Options Weighted Average Exercise Price Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value 2,362,975 24,000 $ $ (456,776) $ (3,442) $ (558) $ 1,926,199 24,000 $ $ (265,110) $ (1,000) $ 1,684,089 $ (162,660) $ (4,660) $ 1,516,769 1,514,675 $ $ 6.95 13.98 $ 3.31 7.27 8.61 9.00 6.96 13.12 $ 2.45 7.28 7.67 7.00 6.64 9.92 7.03 7.02 Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term 4.86 years 4.15 years 3.36 years 2.45 years 2.44 years $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Aggregate Intrinsic Value Range of Exercise Prices 13,791 $3.28 - $12.42 $13.98 3,521 15,306 $3.28 - $13.98 $13.12 1,453 17,598 $3.28 - $13.98 955 1,100 1,100 $3.28 - $13.98 $3.28 - $13.98 The weighted average grant date fair value was $2.13 (2016 - $2.10, 2015 - $2.13) for all options outstanding at December 31, 2017. There was $12 (2016 - $60) of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested options at December 31, 2017 which will be recognized during the next 0.34 years. Cash in the amount of $1,081 was received from employees as a result of employee share option exercises during the year ended December 31, 2017 (2016 – $1,931, 2015 – $3,318). In connection with these exercises, there was no tax benefit realized by the Company. Restricted Shares and Share Units The fair value of each restricted share or share unit is determined based on the market value of the Company's common shares on the date of grant. The total estimated fair value is amortized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period as determined by the Committee. Performance-Based Restricted Share Units The Committee approved the formation of a long-term incentive program under the Plan on March 1, 2011. On that date, the Committee determined to award PB-RSUs to certain senior leaders of the Company. The formula for determining the amount of PB-RSUs awarded uses a combination of a percentage of the employee's base salary (based on a benchmarking analysis from our compensation consultant) divided by the closing price on NASDAQ of our common shares on that date. The grants are performance based which require that certain criteria such as non-GAAP operating return on common equity, underwriting performance, revenue growth and operating expense be met during the performance period to attain a payout. Each metric has a corresponding weighted percentage with a target and maximum level of performance goal set to achieve a payout. All prior, current and future PB-RSUs are paid 50% based on certain criteria stated above, while the other 50% of the payout is based upon the recommendation of the Company's CEO and the Committee's ultimate discretion of individual contribution to business results and strategic success for the performance period. Settlement of the grants can be made in either common shares or cash upon the decision of the Committee and the performance cycles are for three years. Beginning in 2014, the Committee approved an annual award of PB-RSUs to certain senior leaders of the Company with each annual award vesting over three years. Non-Performance-Based Restricted Share Units Beginning in 2012, the Committee approved an annual award of NPB-RSUs with each annual award vesting over three years. The total fair value of share units vested during the year ended December 31, 2017 was $633 (2016 - $1,068, 2015 - $766). Discretionary Non-Performance-Based Restricted Shares ("NPB-RSs") Beginning in 2013, the Committee approved an annual award of NPB-RSs with each annual award vesting either over two or three years. The total fair value of restricted shares vested during the year ended December 31, 2017 was $357 (2016 - $428, 2015 - $698). F-63 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 14. Share Compensation and Pension Plans (continued) The following table shows a summary of activity under the Company's restricted awards: Non-Performance-Based Restricted Share Units Non-Performance-Based Restricted Shares Performance Based Restricted Share Units(1) Number of Restricted Units Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value Number of Restricted Shares Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value Number of Restricted Units Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value Non-vested December 31, 2014 Awards granted Awards vested Awards forfeited Non-vested at December 31, 2015 Awards granted Awards vested Awards forfeited Non-vested at December 31, 2016 Awards granted Awards vested Awards forfeited 146,666 64,795 $ $ (73,333) $ — $ 138,128 75,988 $ $ (94,931) $ — $ 119,185 25,000 $ $ (46,927) $ — $ 10.45 13.89 10.45 — 12.07 13.16 11.24 — 13.42 10.55 13.50 — 86,317 38,180 $ $ (67,061) $ (4,284) $ 53,152 23,000 $ $ (29,949) $ 10.63 13.94 10.41 11.38 13.22 12.90 12.67 807,770 291,730 $ $ (188,681) $ (165,337) $ 745,482 355,544 $ $ (85,847) $ — $ — (169,458) $ 46,203 17,500 $ $ (26,477) $ 13.42 16.75 13.49 845,721 284,130 $ $ (110,976) $ — $ — (208,411) $ Non-vested at December 31, 2017 97,258 $ 12.65 37,226 $ 14.93 810,464 $ 10.51 13.89 9.54 10.61 12.05 13.11 12.29 10.02 12.88 16.75 12.20 11.73 14.60 (1) For Performance Based Shares, the number of shares is stated at the maximum number that can be attained if the performance conditions are met. Forfeitures represent shares forfeited due to vesting below the maximum attainable as a result of the Company not fully meeting the performance conditions. There was $525 and $200 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to RSUs and restricted shares at December 31, 2017, both of which will be recognized during the next 0.91 years and 0.98 years, respectively. Total share-based expense for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $2,938 (2016 - $3,414, 2015 - $2,938). Pension Plans The Company provides pension benefits to eligible employees principally through various defined contribution plans sponsored by the Company which vary by subsidiary. The Company’s expenses for its defined contribution plans for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $2,826 (2016 - $2,805, 2015 - $2,623). F-64 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 15. Statutory Requirements and Dividend Restrictions Our insurance and reinsurance operations are subject to insurance and/or reinsurance laws and regulations in the jurisdictions in which they operate, the most significant of which are Bermuda, the United States and Sweden. These regulations include certain liquidity and solvency requirements whereby restrictions are imposed on the amount of dividends or other distributions, such as loans or cash advances, available to shareholders without prior approval of the insurance regulatory authorities. The statutory capital and surplus and statutory net income (loss) of our principal operating subsidiaries in their respective jurisdictions were as follows: Statutory Capital and Surplus December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 Statutory Net Income (Loss) Maiden Bermuda Maiden US Maiden LF Maiden GF $ 1,205,991 $ 301,661 $ 8,510 $ 1,470,206 296,550 8,101 6,417 — For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 $ (167,307) $ 16,866 $ (481) $ (168) For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 87,888 146,027 (3,926) 17,439 756 (199) — — At December 31, 2017, the Company's net assets were $1,232,626, of which $1,160,044 were restricted primarily as a result of solvency and liquidity requirements imposed on the Company's subsidiaries by local regulators as well as collateral requirements under various reinsurance agreements. a) Bermuda Maiden Bermuda is registered as a Class 3B reinsurer under The Insurance Act 1978 (Bermuda), amendments thereto and related regulations (the "Insurance Act"). Under the Insurance Act, Maiden Bermuda is subject to enhanced capital requirements in addition to minimum solvency and liquidity requirements. At December 31, 2017, Maiden Bermuda satisfied both the enhanced capital requirements and the minimum solvency and liquidity requirements. Under the Insurance Act, Maiden Bermuda is prohibited from declaring or paying dividends of more than 25% of its total statutory capital and surplus, as shown in its previous financial year statutory balance sheet, unless at least seven days before payment of the dividends it files with the BMA an affidavit that it will continue to meet its minimum capital requirements as described above. Maiden Bermuda must obtain the BMA’s prior approval before reducing its total statutory capital, as shown in its previous financial year statutory balance sheet, by 15% or more. Maiden Bermuda is restricted in paying dividends that would result in Maiden Bermuda failing to comply with the ECR as calculated based on the BSCR or cause Maiden Bermuda to fail to meet its relevant margins. Based on these regulatory restrictions, the maximum amount available for payment of dividends to Maiden Holdings, Ltd. from Maiden Bermuda during 2017 without prior regulatory approval is $301,498. During the year ended December 31, 2017, dividends from Maiden Bermuda to Maiden Holdings, Ltd. were $105,000 (2016 - $445,000, 2015 -$0). b) United States Maiden US files financial statements in accordance with statutory accounting practices ("SAP") prescribed or permitted by state insurance regulatory authorities. The minimum statutory capital and surplus necessary to satisfy regulatory requirements for Maiden US for the year ended December 31, 2017 was $88,389 (2016 - $86,646). These requirements were met by Maiden US throughout the year ended December 31, 2017. Without prior approval of its domiciliary commissioner, dividends to shareholders are limited by the laws of the company's state of domicile, Missouri to the greater of 10% of statutory policyholders’ surplus at the preceding December 31, or net income, less net realized capital gain on investments, for the 12-month period ending December 31 of the preceding year. Additionally, Maiden US may only pay dividends if it has positive unassigned funds. Accordingly, the maximum dividend payments that can be made to shareholders in the next year without prior approval by the Missouri Department of Insurance is $0. c) Sweden The Company has two Swedish domiciled insurance subsidiaries in Sweden, Maiden LF and Maiden GF, both regulated by the Swedish Finansinspektionen ("Swedish FSA").Maiden LF was required to maintain a minimum level of statutory capital and surplus of $4,442 at December 31, 2017 (2016 - $3,891). This requirement was met by Maiden LF throughout the year. Maiden LF is subject to statutory and regulatory restrictions under the Swedish FSA that limit the maximum amount of annual dividends or distributions paid by Maiden LF to Maiden Holdings. At December 31, 2017, Maiden LF is allowed to pay dividends or distributions not exceeding $2,507 (2016 - $2,843). Maiden GF was granted a general insurance license effective September 14, 2016 with an approved level of initial statutory capital and surplus of $6,135. Maiden GF started writing business in 2017 and was required to maintain a minimum level of statutory capital and surplus of $4,442 at December 31, 2017. This requirement was met by Maiden GF throughout the year. Maiden GF is subject to statutory and regulatory restrictions under the Swedish FSA that limit the maximum amount of annual dividends or distributions paid by Maiden GF to Maiden Holdings. At December 31, 2017, Maiden GF is allowed to pay dividends or distributions not exceeding $0 (2016 - $0). F-65 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 16. Taxation Under current Bermuda law, Maiden Holdings and Maiden Bermuda, have received an undertaking from the Bermuda government exempting them from all local income, withholding and capital gains taxes until March 31, 2035. At the present time, no such taxes are levied in Bermuda. Maiden Holdings and Maiden Bermuda believe that they operate in a manner such that they will not be considered to be engaged in a trade or business in the U.S. Accordingly, Maiden Holdings and Maiden Bermuda have not recorded any provision for U.S. taxation. Our U.S. subsidiaries are subject to federal, state and local corporate income taxes and other taxes applicable to U.S. corporations. The provision for federal income taxes has been determined under the principles of the consolidated tax provisions of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code and Regulations. Should our U.S. subsidiaries pay a dividend outside the U.S. group, withholding taxes will apply. Tax years 2012 through 2016 are not under examination but remain subject to examination in the U.S by the Internal Revenue Service. All prior tax years have been audited and closed without any impact on our operations. The Company has subsidiary operations in various other locations around the world, including Australia, Austria, Germany, Ireland, Netherlands, Russia, Sweden and the U.K., that are subject to relevant taxes in those jurisdictions. These subsidiaries are not under examination but generally remain subject to examination in all applicable jurisdictions for tax years from 2013 through 2017. Deferred income taxes have not been accrued with respect to certain undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries as it is the intention that such earnings will remain reinvested or will not be taxable. If the earnings were to be distributed, as dividends or otherwise, such amounts may be subject to withholding tax in the country of the paying entity. Currently, however, no withholding taxes have been accrued. There were no unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015. (Loss) income before taxes and income tax (benefit) expense for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 was as follows: For the Year Ended December 31, (Loss) income before income taxes – Domestic (Bermuda) Loss before income taxes – Foreign (U.S. and others) Total (loss) income before income taxes Current tax expense – Domestic (Bermuda) Current tax expense – Foreign (U.S. and others) Total current tax expense Deferred tax expense – Domestic (Bermuda) Deferred tax (benefit) expense – Foreign (U.S. and others) Total deferred tax (benefit) expense Total income tax (benefit) expense 2017 (165,120) $ (8,183) (173,303) $ 2016 2015 67,881 (18,169) 49,712 $ $ 134,012 (7,690) 126,322 — $ — $ 669 669 490 490 — $ — $ (4,227) (4,227) 1,084 1,084 — 780 780 — 1,258 1,258 (3,558) $ 1,574 $ 2,038 $ $ $ $ $ The following table is a reconciliation of the actual income tax rate for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 to the amount computed by applying the effective tax rate of 0.0% under Bermuda law to income before income taxes: For the Year Ended December 31, (Loss) income before income taxes Less: income tax (benefit) expense Net (loss) income Reconciliation of effective tax rate (% of income before income taxes) Bermuda tax rate U.S. taxes at statutory rates Rate change in the U.S. Valuation allowance in respect of U.S. taxes Other jurisdictions Actual tax rate 2017 $ (173,303) (3,558) $ (169,745) $ $ 2016 49,712 1,574 48,138 2015 126,322 2,038 124,284 $ $ — % 2.8 % 2.9 % (3.4)% (0.2)% 2.1 % — % (10.8)% — % 13.2 % 0.8 % 3.2 % — % (2.2)% — % 3.2 % 0.6 % 1.6 % F-66 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 16. Taxation (continued) Deferred income taxes reflect the tax impact of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and income tax purposes. The significant components of our deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2017 and 2016 were as follows: December 31, Deferred tax assets: Net operating losses Unearned premiums Discounting of net loss and LAE reserves Accruals not currently deductible Retro reinsurance adjustment Amortization of intangible assets OTTI Others Deferred tax assets before valuation allowance Valuation allowance Deferred tax assets, net Deferred tax liabilities: Deferred commission and other acquisition expenses Intangible assets with indefinite lives Amortization of goodwill Reserve change in basis Net unrealized gains on investment Others Deferred tax liabilities Net deferred tax liability 2017 2016 $ 39,923 $ 6,537 12,222 65 4,481 1,180 — 797 65,205 51,073 14,132 6,927 1,050 6,384 5,076 1,141 434 21,012 $ 6,880 $ 63,143 11,336 12,091 160 2,679 2,439 1,198 610 93,656 78,300 15,356 11,826 1,750 9,480 — 2,713 730 26,499 11,143 Pursuant to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, the U.S. corporate tax rate is reduced from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018 and as a result the Company recorded a write-down of its U.S. deferred tax liability of $4,956 resulting in a lower income tax expense of the same amount during 2017. The net deferred tax liability at December 31, 2017 was $6,880 (2016 - $11,143). A valuation allowance has been established against the net U.S. deferred tax assets which is primarily attributable to net operating losses, unearned premium and loss reserve discounting. At this time, we believe it is necessary to establish a valuation allowance against the net deferred tax assets due to insufficient positive evidence regarding the utilization of these losses. During 2017, the Company recorded a net decrease in the valuation allowance of $27,227 (2016 - decrease of $545) which includes the impact of the rate change of $34,049. At December 31, 2017, the Company has an available net operating loss carry-forward of approximately $189,891 (2016 - $180,408) for income tax purposes which expires beginning in 2029. F-67 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) 17. Subsequent Events Dividends In February 2018, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the following quarterly dividends: Common shares Preference shares – Series A Preference shares – Series C Preference shares - Series D 18. Condensed Quarterly Financial Data — Unaudited The following tables summarize our quarterly financial data: Dividend per Share 0.15 Payable on: April 16, 2018 Record date: April 2, 2018 0.515625 March 15, 2018 March 1, 2018 0.445313 March 15, 2018 March 1, 2018 0.418750 March 15, 2018 March 1, 2018 $ $ $ $ 2017 Quarters Ended Total revenues Net income (loss) Net income (loss) attributable to Maiden common shareholders Comprehensive income (loss) – attributable to Maiden Basic earnings (loss) per common share attributable to Maiden common shareholders Diluted earnings (loss) per common share attributable to Maiden common shareholders March 31 June 30 September 30 December 31(1) $ 756,307 $ 754,756 $ 703,036 $ 707,049 26,501 20,490 27,117 (16,335) (22,359) 3,658 (55,054) (63,596) (44,547) (124,857) (133,587) (157,767) $ $ 0.24 0.23 $ $ (0.26) $ (0.74) $ (1.59) (0.26) $ (0.74) $ (1.59) 2016 Quarters Ended Total revenues Net income (loss) Net income (loss) attributable to Maiden common shareholders Comprehensive income (loss) – attributable to Maiden Basic earnings (loss) per common share attributable to Maiden common shareholders (3) Diluted earnings (loss) per common share attributable to Maiden common shareholders (3) March 31 $ 659,414 June 30 $ 674,746 36,829 27,216 130,130 39,887 30,910 89,389 $ September 30 December 31(2) 659,284 $ 738,189 (69,374) (74,731) (177,577) 31,829 45,802 40,796 $ $ 0.37 0.35 $ $ 0.42 0.39 $ $ 0.42 0.40 $ $ (0.87) (0.87) (2) (1) During the fourth quarter of 2017, the Company increased the prior year reserves mainly in both our Diversified Reinsurance and AmTrust Reinsurance segments. The Company recorded unfavorable reserve development which reduced its net income, net income attributable to Maiden common shareholders and comprehensive income during the three months ended December 31, 2017 by approximately $170,960 or $2.03 per basic and diluted common share. During the fourth quarter of 2016, following the receipt of updated information during the Company's reserving process and in response to a very challenging commercial auto market, the Company increased the reserve for loss and LAE in both our Diversified Reinsurance and AmTrust Reinsurance segments as well as our NGHC run-off business. The Company recorded unfavorable reserve development which reduced its net income, net income attributable to Maiden common shareholders and comprehensive income during the three months ended December 31, 2016 by approximately $120,426 or $1.40 per basic common share and $1.39 per diluted common share. (3) Basic earnings (loss) per common share attributable to Maiden common shareholders and diluted earnings (loss) per common share attributable to Maiden common shareholders is calculated as a function of average shares issued, or dilutive, during the respective period. The effect of mandatory convertible preference shares were excluded in the calculation of diluted EPS for the year ended December 31, 2016 (for the period that the convertible shares were outstanding) as they were anti-dilutive however they were dilutive in each of the first three quarters of 2016 until their mandatory conversion to common shares on September 15, 2016. Please refer to "Note 12. Earnings per Common Share" for further details. F-68 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. SUMMARY OF INVESTMENTS OTHER THAN INVESTMENTS IN RELATED PARTIES (in thousands of U.S. dollars) Schedule I December 31, 2017 AFS fixed maturities: U.S. treasury bonds U.S. agency bonds – mortgage-backed U.S. agency bonds – other Non-U.S. government and supranational bonds Asset-backed securities Corporate bonds Municipal bonds Total AFS fixed maturities HTM fixed maturities: Corporate bonds Municipal bonds Total HTM fixed maturities Other investments Total investments Amortized Cost(1) Fair Value Amount at Which Shown in the Balance Sheet $ 60,711 $ 60,801 $ 60,801 2,026,305 2,014,614 2,014,614 29,941 33,381 317,544 29,782 31,876 321,410 29,782 31,876 321,410 1,557,611 1,583,311 1,583,311 2,500 2,576 2,576 4,027,993 4,044,370 4,044,370 1,037,464 1,065,245 1,037,464 60,337 60,381 60,337 1,097,801 1,125,626 1,097,801 5,219 6,600 6,600 $ 5,131,013 $ 5,176,596 $ 5,148,771 (1) Original cost of other investments and, for fixed maturities, original cost reduced by repayments and adjusted for amortization of premiums or discounts S-1 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS — PARENT COMPANY As of December 31, 2017 and 2016 (In thousands of U.S. dollars, except share and per share data) Schedule II ASSETS Fixed maturities, available-for-sale, at fair value (Amortized cost 2017: $68,952; 2016: $16,220) Other investments, at fair value (Cost 2017: $500; 2016: $4,752) Cash and cash equivalents Investment in subsidiaries Balances due from subsidiaries Goodwill Other assets Total assets LIABILITIES Accrued expenses and other liabilities Balances due to subsidiaries Senior notes - principal amount Less: unamortized debt issuance costs Senior notes, net Total liabilities Preference shares EQUITY Common shares ($0.01 par value; 87,730,054 and 87,321,012 shares issued in 2017 and 2016, respectively; 82,974,895 and 86,271,109 shares outstanding in 2017 and 2016, respectively) Additional paid-in capital Accumulated other comprehensive income Retained earnings Treasury shares, at cost (4,755,159 and 1,049,903 shares in 2017 and 2016, respectively) Total equity Total liabilities and equity 2017 2016 $ 68,965 $ 500 9,886 16,363 6,586 16,677 1,401,547 1,555,857 $ $ $ $ 79,376 5,972 4,260 1,570,506 14,810 217,176 110,000 3,654 106,346 338,332 73,414 5,972 1,248 1,676,117 14,478 194,536 110,000 3,694 106,306 315,320 465,000 315,000 877 748,113 13,354 35,472 (30,642) 1,232,174 1,570,506 $ $ 873 749,256 14,997 285,662 (4,991) 1,360,797 1,676,117 1) Maiden Holdings has fully and unconditionally guaranteed the $152.5 million 2013 Senior Notes - 7.75% issued by its wholly owned subsidiary, Maiden NA. The Senior Notes are an unsecured and unsubordinated obligation of Maiden Holdings. S-2 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME — PARENT COMPANY For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (In thousands of U.S. dollars) Schedule II For the Year Ended December 31, Revenues Net investment income Net realized gains on investment Other fee revenue Expenses General and administrative expenses Interest and amortization expenses Foreign exchange (gains) losses Loss before equity in earnings of consolidated subsidiaries Equity in (loss) earnings of consolidated subsidiaries Net (loss) income Dividends on preference shares Net (loss) income attributable to Maiden common shareholders Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Maiden 2017 2016 2015 $ 885 $ 1,693 $ 5,466 — 6,351 20,092 7,328 (819) 26,601 (20,250) (149,646) (169,896) (29,156) 1,990 — 3,683 17,008 3,988 1,371 22,367 (18,684) 67,664 48,980 (33,756) 2,034 20 1,321 3,375 16,319 — 668 16,987 (13,612) 138,088 124,476 (24,337) $ $ (199,052) $ 15,224 $ 100,139 (171,539) $ 87,744 $ 5,416 S-3 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS — PARENT COMPANY For the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015 (In thousands of U.S. dollars) Schedule II For the Year Ended December 31, Cash flows provided by operating activities 2017 2016 2015 Net (loss) income $ (169,896) $ 48,980 $ 124,476 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Equity in loss (earnings) of consolidated subsidiaries 149,646 (67,664) (138,088) Depreciation and amortization of debt issuance cost and bond premium and discount Net realized gains on investment Foreign exchange (gains) losses Share-based compensation expense Changes in assets – (increase) decrease: Balance due from subsidiaries Other assets Changes in liabilities – increase (decrease) Accounts payable and accrued liabilities Balances due to subsidiaries Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities Cash flows used in investing activities Purchases of fixed-maturities – available-for-sale Purchases of other investments Proceeds from sales of fixed-maturities – available-for-sale Proceeds from maturities, paydowns and calls of fixed maturities – available-for-sale Proceeds from sales of other investments Dividends from subsidiaries Contributions to subsidiaries Purchase of fixed assets Net cash used in investing activities Cash flows provided by financing activities 2016 Senior notes, net of issuance costs Preference shares issuance, net of issuance costs Dividends paid – preference shares Dividends paid – Maiden common shareholders Issuance of common shares Repurchase of common shares Net cash provided by financing activities Effect of exchange rate changes on foreign currency cash Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year Cash and cash equivalents, end of year 131 (5,466) (819) 2,938 (5,159) 305 478 22,640 (5,202) (74,893) (500) 22,806 15 9,894 105,652 207 (1,990) 1,371 3,414 (7,222) (125) (216) 84,504 61,259 (16,203) — 44,475 — 350 — 222 (20) 668 2,938 (20,930) 237 12 49,162 18,677 — — 1,041 — — — (100,751) (107,546) (122,757) — — (78,924) (121,716) (3,410) (41,187) — 144,942 (29,156) (51,634) 1,081 (25,651) 39,582 16 (6,791) 16,677 106,285 (143) (33,756) (43,127) 1,931 (470) 30,720 16 13,071 3,606 — 159,628 (24,337) (38,204) 3,318 (654) 99,751 — (3,288) 6,894 3,606 $ 9,886 $ 16,677 $ S-4 Other Total Other Total MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. SUPPLEMENTARY INSURANCE INFORMATION (In thousands of U.S. dollars) Schedule III December 31, 2017 For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 Deferred commission and other acquisition expenses Reserve for loss and loss adjustment expenses Unearned premiums Net premiums earned Net investment income Net loss and LAE Amortization of deferred commission and other acquisition expenses General and admin. expenses Net premiums written Diversified Reinsurance $ 79,633 $ 1,187,371 $ 297,754 $ 823,365 $ — $ 650,916 $ 205,982 $ 35,817 $ 807,362 AmTrust Reinsurance Total - Reportable Segments 359,964 439,597 2,290,981 1,179,284 1,909,644 3,478,352 1,477,038 2,733,009 — — 1,498,881 2,149,797 614,777 820,759 — 68,896 — (230) 166,345 10,214 (1) 3,052 38,869 31,691 1,954,856 2,762,218 (230) $ 439,597 $ 3,547,248 $ 1,477,038 $ 2,732,779 $ 166,345 $ 2,160,011 $ 820,758 $ 70,560 $ 2,761,988 December 31, 2016 For the Year Ended December 31, 2016 Deferred commission and other acquisition expenses Reserve for loss and loss adjustment expenses Unearned premiums Net premiums earned Net investment income Net loss and LAE Amortization of deferred commission and other acquisition expenses General and admin. expenses Net premiums written Diversified Reinsurance $ 85,432 $ 1,103,936 $ 323,873 $ 724,124 $ — $ 579,520 $ 188,506 $ 35,681 $ 766,119 AmTrust Reinsurance Total - Reportable Segments 339,173 424,605 1,757,728 1,151,633 1,843,621 2,861,664 1,475,506 2,567,745 — — 1,225,830 1,805,350 — 34,832 — 405 145,892 14,556 584,820 773,326 338 2,896 38,577 28,407 1,888,428 2,654,547 405 $ 424,605 $ 2,896,496 $ 1,475,506 $ 2,568,150 $ 145,892 $ 1,819,906 $ 773,664 $ 66,984 $ 2,654,952 December 31, 2015 For the Year Ended December 31, 2015 Deferred commission and other acquisition expenses Reserve for loss and loss adjustment expenses Unearned premiums Net premiums earned Net investment income Net loss and LAE Amortization of deferred commission and other acquisition expenses General and admin. expenses Net premiums written Diversified Reinsurance AmTrust Reinsurance Total - Reportable Segments Other Total $ 80,012 $ 1,046,471 $ 277,460 $ 744,875 $ — $ 547,296 $ 196,292 $ 35,312 $ 734,781 317,536 397,548 1,420,418 1,077,112 1,684,191 2,466,889 1,354,572 2,429,066 — — 1,074,072 1,621,368 — 43,212 — 3 131,092 12,202 527,863 724,155 42 3,016 38,328 26,544 1,779,334 2,514,115 1 $ 397,548 $ 2,510,101 $ 1,354,572 $ 2,429,069 $ 131,092 $ 1,633,570 $ 724,197 $ 64,872 $ 2,514,116 S-5 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. SUPPLEMENTARY REINSURANCE INFORMATION (In thousands of U.S. dollars) Schedule IV For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 Premiums – General Insurance 2016 Premiums – General Insurance 2015 Premiums – General Insurance (a) Gross (b) Ceded to other companies $ 5,765 $ 54,063 (c) Assumed from other companies $ 2,810,286 (d) Net amount (a) - (b) + (c) $ 2,761,988 8,045 9,160 176,396 148,710 2,823,303 2,654,952 2,653,666 2,514,116 Percentage of amount to net (c)/(d) 101.7% 106.3% 105.6% S-6 MAIDEN HOLDINGS, LTD. SUPPLEMENTARY INSURANCE INFORMATION CONCERNING PROPERTY/CASUALTY INSURANCE OPERATIONS (In thousands of U.S. dollars) Schedule VI For the Year Ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 Net loss and LAE Current Year Prior Year Paid loss and LAE $ 1,802,118 $ 357,893 $ 1,582,371 1,600,454 1,558,704 219,452 74,866 1,437,591 1,350,357 S-7 Corporate Information Corporate Headquarters Form 10-K/Investor Contact Maiden Holdings, Ltd. Ideation House, 2nd Floor 94 Pitts Bay Road Pembroke HM 08 Bermuda: 441 298 4900 The Company’s principal operating subsidiaries are located in Bermuda, the United States and the United Kingdom. A copy of the Maiden Holdings, Ltd. 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Com mis sion is available on the Company’s website at www.maiden.bm. It is also available from the Company at no charge. These requests and other investor contacts should be directed to Investor Rela tions at the Company’s corporate office. Common Shares The Company’s common shares trade on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “MHLD.” Annual Meeting May 8, 2018 Hamilton, Bermuda Transfer Agent and Registrar Independent Auditors AST 6201 15th Avenue Brooklyn, NY 11219 800 937 5449 or 718 921 8200 Deloitte Ltd. Hamilton, Bermuda Board of Directors & Executive Officers Patrick J. Haveron President, Maiden Reinsurance Ltd. Thomas H. Highet President, Maiden Reinsurance North America, Inc. Simcha G. Lyons Director Lawrence F. Metz Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary Raymond M. Neff Director Yehuda L. Neuberger Director Steven H. Nigro Lead Independent Director Arturo M. Raschbaum President and Chief Executive Officer Maxwell F. Reid President, Maiden Global Holdings, Ltd. Karen L. Schmitt Chief Financial Officer Barry D. Zyskind Chairman of the Board of Directors Reconciliation to U.S. GAAP Reconciliation of net income attributable to Maiden common shareholders to income from operations: Net (loss) income attributable to Maiden Add (subtract) Foreign exchange and other gains, net Amortization of intangible assets Interest and amortization expenses Accelerated amortization of senior note issuance cost Income tax (benefit) expense Loss attributable to noncontrolling interest For the Year ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 in $ millions $ (170) $ 49 $ 124 $ 102 $ 103 15 2 23 3 (3) — (12) 3 28 2 2 (1) (8) 3 29 — 2 — (4) 3 30 28 2 — (3) 4 39 — 2 — (Loss) income from operations $ (130) $ 71 $ 150 $ 161 $ 145 Investable assets: Total investments Cash and cash equivalents Restricted cash and cash equivalents Loan to related party Total investable assets As at December 31, 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 in $ millions $ 5,149 68 123 168 $ 4,737 45 104 168 $ 4,128 89 243 168 $ 3,470 108 284 168 $ 3,167 140 77 168 $ 5,508 $ 5,054 $ 4,628 $ 4,030 $ 3,552 m o c . s r o n n o c - n a r r u c . w w w / . c n I , s r o n n o C & n a r r u C y b n g i s e D t r o p e R l a u n n A M A I D E N H O L D I N G S , L T D . Ideation House 94 Pitts Bay Road, 2nd Floor Pembroke HM 08 Bermuda P: 441 298 4900 F: 441 292 0471 maiden.bm 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above