Quarterlytics / Real Estate / Real Estate - Services / Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. / FY2013 Annual Report

Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc.
Annual Report 2013

MLP · NYSE Real Estate
Claim this profile
Ticker MLP
Exchange NYSE
Sector Real Estate
Industry Real Estate - Services
Employees 15
← All annual reports
FY2013 Annual Report · Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc.
Loading PDF…
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES  AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K

(Mark  One)

(cid:1) ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13  OR 15(d) OF THE  SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013

OR

(cid:2) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from 

 to 

Commission file number 001-06510
MAUI LAND & PINEAPPLE COMPANY, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

HAWAII
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

200 VILLAGE ROAD,
LAHAINA, MAUI, HAWAII
(Address of principal executive offices)

99-0107542
(IRS Employer
Identification number)

96761
(Zip Code)

Securities  registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Registrant’s telephone number, including area  code  (808) 877-3351

Title of Each Class

Name of Each  Exchange  on Which  Registered

Common Stock, without Par Value

New York  Stock Exchange

Securities  registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate  by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes (cid:2) No  (cid:1)

Indicate  by check mark if the registrant is not  required  to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of  the Act.

Yes (cid:2) No  (cid:1)

Indicate  by check mark whether the registrant (1)  has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding  12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file
such  reports), and  (2) has been subject  to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes (cid:1) No (cid:2)

Indicate  by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on  its corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive  Data  File required to be submitted and  posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months
(or  for  such  shorter period that the registrant was  required  to submit and post  such files). Yes (cid:1) No (cid:2)

Indicate  by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405  of Regulation S-K is not  contained herein, and
will not  be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in  definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference
in Part  III of  this  Form 10-K or any  amendment to this Form 10-K. (cid:1)

Indicate  by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a

smaller  reporting company. See the definitions of  ‘‘large accelerated filer,’’ accelerated filer’’ and ‘‘smaller reporting company’’ in
Rule 12b-2 of  the  Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated  filer (cid:2)

Accelerated filer (cid:2)

Smaller reporting company (cid:1)

Non-accelerated filer (cid:2)
(Do  not check if  a
smaller reporting company)

Indicate  by check mark whether the registrant is a shell Company (as defined in Rule  12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes (cid:2) No  (cid:1)

The  aggregate market value of the registrant’s  common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on June 30, 2013, the last

business  day of  the registrant’s most  recently completed second  fiscal  quarter, computed by reference to the  last sale price  of the
registrant’s  common stock as reported by the New York Stock Exchange on such date, was approximately  $26,645,934. This
computation assumes that all directors,  executive officers and persons known to the Company to be the beneficial owners of more
than  ten percent of the Company’s common stock  are  affiliates of the Company. Such assumption should not be deemed conclusive
for any other  purpose.

At  March 1,  2014, the number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock was 18,767,663.

Documents incorporated by reference:

In accordance with General Instruction G(3)  to Form 10-K, certain  information required by Part III of Form  10-K is
incorporated into this Annual Report  on  Form  10-K by reference to the registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its 2013 annual
meeting  of stockholders, which will be  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120  days after the  close  of its fiscal
year  ended December 31, 2013. Only those portions of the proxy  statement that are  specifically incorporated by reference herein
shall  constitute  a  part of this annual report on Form  10-K.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND RISKS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K filed  by Maui Land & Pineapple  Company, Inc. with  the
Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, contain forward-looking statements intended to qualify
for the safe harbor from liability established by  the Private Securities Litigation Reform  Act of 1995.
These statements relate to future events or our  future financial  performance  and involve known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that  may  cause our actual results, levels of activity,
performance or achievements to differ materially  from any future  results, levels of activity,  performance
or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These statements can be
identified by the fact that they do not relate  strictly to historical or current facts. They  contain words
such  as ‘‘may,’’ ‘‘will,’’ ‘‘project,’’ ‘‘might,’’  ‘‘expect,’’ ‘‘believe,’’ ‘‘anticipate,’’ ‘‘intend,’’ ‘‘could,’’ ‘‘would,’’
‘‘estimate,’’ ‘‘continue’’ or ‘‘pursue,’’ or the negative or other  variations thereof or  comparable
terminology. Actual results could differ materially from those projected  in forward-looking statements
as a result of the following factors, among others:

(cid:127) unstable macroeconomic market conditions,  including, but not limited to, energy costs, credit

markets and changes in income and asset values;

(cid:127) risks associated with real estate investments generally, and more  specifically, demand for real

estate and tourism in Hawaii;

(cid:127) risks due to joint venture relationships;

(cid:127) our ability to complete land development  projects  within forecasted  time and budget

expectations, if at all;

(cid:127) our ability to obtain required land use  entitlements at reasonable costs,  if at all;

(cid:127) our ability to compete with other developers of luxury  real  estate in Maui;

(cid:127) potential liabilities and obligations under various federal, state  and  local environmental

regulations with respect to the presence  of  hazardous or toxic substances;

(cid:127) changes in weather conditions or the occurrence  of natural disasters;

(cid:127) our ability to maintain the listing of our common  stock on the New York  Stock Exchange;

(cid:127) our ability to comply with funding  requirements for our defined  benefit pension plans;

(cid:127) our ability to comply with the terms of our indebtedness, including  the financial  covenants set
forth therein, and to extend the maturity date,  or  refinance such  indebtedness, prior to its
maturity date;

(cid:127) our expectation, absent the sale of some of our  real estate  holdings or refinancing, that we do

not expect to be able to pay any significant amount of our debt;

(cid:127) our ability to raise capital through the  sale of certain real estate assets;  and

(cid:127) availability of capital on terms favorable to us, or at all.

Such risks and uncertainties also include those risks and  uncertainties  discussed under  the headings

‘‘Business,’’ ‘‘Risk Factors,’’ and ‘‘Management’s  Discussion  and Analysis of  Financial Condition and
Results of Operations’’ in this annual report, as well as other factors described from time to time in
our other reports filed with the SEC.  Although we  believe that our opinions and expectations  reflected
in the  forward-looking statements are reasonable as  of  the date of this report, we cannot guarantee
future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements, and our  actual results may differ
substantially from the views and expectations set forth in  this report. Thus, you should  not  place undue
reliance  on any forward-looking statements. New factors  emerge from time to time, and  it is not
possible for us to predict which factors will arise. In  addition, we cannot assess the  impact  of  each
factor on our business or the extent to which  any  factor, or  combination of factors,  may cause actual
results to differ materially from those  contained  in any forward-looking statements. Further, any
forward-looking statements speak only  as of the date  made  and, except as required by law, we
undertake no obligation to publicly revise our forward-looking statements to reflect events  or
circumstances that arise after the date of this report.

i

Forward Looking Statements and Risks

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
Item 1.
Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 1A. Risk Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 2.
Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 3.
Mine Safety Disclosures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 4.

PART II
Item 5.

Item 6.
Item 7.

Market for Registrant’s Common  Equity,  Related Stockholder Matters  and Issuer

Purchases of Equity Securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Selected Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Management’s Discussion  and  Analysis of Financial Condition  and Results of

Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About  Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 8.
Changes in and Disagreements  with Accountants  on Accounting  and Financial
Item 9.

Disclosure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 9B. Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers  and Corporate Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Item 11.
Security Ownership of Certain  Beneficial  Owners and  Management and Related
Item 12.

Item 13.
Item 14.

PART IV
Item 15.

Stockholder Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and  Director Independence . . . . . . . .
Principal Accountant Fees  and  Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

SIGNATURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1
7
13
13
14
15

15
15

15
23
24

50
50
51

51
51

51
52
52

52

57

ii

Item 1. BUSINESS

Overview

PART I

Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. is a Hawaii corporation and the successor  to  a business

organized in 1909. Depending upon the context, the  terms the ‘‘Company,’’ ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘our,’’ and ‘‘us,’’
refer to either Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. alone, or to Maui Land &  Pineapple
Company, Inc. and its subsidiaries collectively. The Company consists  of  a landholding and operating
parent company, its principal subsidiary,  Kapalua Land Company, Ltd.  and  certain other subsidiaries of
the Company.

We  own approximately 23,300 acres of  land on Maui and develop, sell, and manage residential,

resort, commercial, and industrial real estate through the following business segments:

(cid:127) Real Estate—Our real estate operations consist of land  planning and entitlement, development,

and sales.

(cid:127) Leasing—Our leasing activities include commercial,  industrial and agricultural land and facilities

leases, licensing of our registered trademarks  and trade  names,  and stewardship and
conservation efforts.

(cid:127) Utilities—We operate two publicly-regulated utility  companies  which provide potable and

non-potable water and sewage transmission services to the  Kapalua Resort. In addition,  we also
manage ditch, reservoir and well systems which provide non-potable irrigation water to West and
Upcountry Maui areas.

(cid:127) Resort Amenities—Within the Kapalua Resort, we manage  a private,  non-equity club program.

Additional information and operating  results pertaining to the above business segments can be

found under the heading ‘‘Description  of  Business’’ in  this Item  1 and  in Note 13 of our Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements in  Item  8 of this annual report.

Fiscal Year 2013 Business Developments

The following highlights several of our  significant business developments  during 2013.

The Residences at Kapalua Bay Settlement—In November 2013, the parties involved  in The
Residences at Kapalua Bay development reached  a comprehensive settlement with  respect to the
numerous issues and disputes surrounding  the project.  As part of the  settlement, we  were relieved of
our  obligation to purchase certain amenities of  the project  for approximately $35 million,  in exchange
for a $2.4 million payment toward deferred maintenance  at the  project and other consideration
including the conveyance of eight acres of land underlying and adjacent to the project.

Asset Sales—In November 2013, we sold a 10-acre light  industrial zoned parcel in West  Maui  for

$5.4 million. In June 2013, we sold a  7-acre  parcel and building that was the  last of our former
agricultural processing facilities in Central Maui for $4.0  million.

Defined Benefit Pension Plans—In June 2013, the State of Hawaii  enacted a bill directing the
Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR),  in consultation with the Hawaiian Islands  Land
Trust, to engage in the purchase of an  approximately  270-acre parcel of former agricultural land  in
West  Maui, known as Lipoa Point, from  the Company.  The bill further requires the  DLNR to ensure to
the  maximum  extent  practicable  that  we  utilize  the  proceeds  from  the  sale  to  benefit  our  defined
benefit pension plans.

1

For a  further discussion about our business  developments in 2013, see ‘‘Management’s Discussion

and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of  Operations,’’ in  Item  7 of this annual report.

Description of Business

Real Estate

Our Real Estate segment includes all  land planning, entitlement, development  and sales activities
of our landholdings on Maui. Our principal  real estate development is  the Kapalua Resort, a  master-
planned, destination resort community  located in  West Maui encompassing  approximately  3,000 acres.
A summary of our landholdings as of  December 31, 2013  follows:

Fully entitled urban . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Agricultural zoned . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Conservation/watershed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

West
Maui

Upcountry
Maui

1,200
8,300
11,800

21,300

2,000

2,000

Total

1,200
10,300
11,800

23,300

Real Estate Planning and Entitlements—Appropriate entitlements must be obtained for land  that is
intended for development. Securing proper land  entitlement is  a  process that requires obtaining county,
state and federal approvals, which can  take  many  years  to  complete  and entails  a variety  of risks.  The
entitlement process requires that we satisfy  all conditions and restrictions  imposed in  connection with
such governmental approvals, including, among other things,  construction  of infrastructure
improvements, payment of impact fees—for  conditions  such as  parks and  traffic mitigation—restrictions
on permitted uses of the land, and provision  of affordable housing.  We  actively work with the
community, regulatory agencies, and  legislative bodies at  all levels  of government in an effort to obtain
necessary entitlements consistent with  the needs of  the community.

We  have approximately 1,500 acres of  land in Maui that are  in various stages  of the development

process. The breakdown of these acres is  as follows:

Location

Number of
Acres

Kapalua Resort . . . . .
Pulelehua . . . . . . . . .
Hali’imaile . . . . . . . .

900
300
300

Zoned
for
Planned
Use

Yes
Yes
No

Anticipated
Completion
Dates

2019 - 2039
2019 - 2024
2029 - 2034

Deferred
Development
Costs
(millions)

Projected
Costs  to
Complete
(millions)

$7.0
$0.6
$0.1

$500 - $1,000
$200 - $300
$100 - $200

We  are engaged in planning, permitting  and entitlement activities  for our development  projects,
and we intend to proceed with construction and  sales  of  the following projects, among others, when
internal and external factors permit:

(cid:127) Kapalua Resort: We began development of the Kapalua Resort in the  early 1970’s. Today,  the
Kapalua Resort has become known as an internationally  recognized  world-class golf resort
destination and residential community. We presently  have entitlements to develop a variety of
projects in the Kapalua Resort. Two  that are currently planned include Kapalua Mauka and
Kapalua Central Resort.

Kapalua Mauka is the long-planned expansion of the Kapalua Resort located directly upslope  of
the  existing  resort  development.  As  presently  planned,  it  encompasses  800  acres  and  includes  up
to 639 residential units with extensive amenities, including up  to  27 additional holes of  golf.
State and County land use entitlements have  been  secured for this  project.

2

Kapalua Central Resort is a commercial town center and  residential community located in the
core of the Kapalua Resort. It is comprised of 46  acres  and is  planned to include  up to
61,000 square feet of commercial space  and 188  condominium and multi-family residential units.
State and County land use entitlements have been  secured for this  project.

(cid:127) Pulelehua: This project is designed to be a new  working-class community in West Maui. It
encompasses 312 acres and is currently  planned to include 882 single and multi-family
residences, 95,000 square feet of commercial and  retail spaces, an elementary  school, churches
and  a community center. State and County  land use entitlements  have been secured for this
project.

(cid:127) Hali‘imaile Town: An expansion of the existing plantation town in  Upcountry Maui, this project
is contemplated to be a holistic traditional community with agriculture and sustainability as core
design elements. The project includes  290 acres designated as urban ‘‘Small Town’’ in  the Maui
county’s general plan. We are in the early stages of this  project’s development,  which will require
further county and state approvals which are expected to take several years.

Projected  development  costs  are  expected  to  be  financed  by  debt  financing,  through  joint  ventures

with  other  development  or  construction  companies,  or  a  combination  of  these  methods.

Real Estate Sales—Our wholly-owned subsidiary, Kapalua Realty Company,  Ltd. provides general

brokerage services  for resales of properties in the Kapalua  Resort  and surrounding areas.

Revenues from our Real Estate segment totaled $5.4 million,  or approximately 36% of total

operating revenues for the year ended December 31, 2013.

The price and market for luxury and other  real estate in Maui is  highly cyclical based principally
upon interest rates, the general real estate markets in the mainland United States and specifically the
West  Coast, the popularity of Hawaii  as  a vacation  destination and  second-home market, the general
condition of the economy in the United  States and Asia, and the relationship of  the dollar to foreign
currencies. Our real estate business faces  substantial  competition from other land developers on the
island of Maui, as well as in other parts  of Hawaii and  the mainland  United States.

Leasing

Our Leasing segment activities include commercial,  light industrial  and agricultural  land leases,

licensing of our registered trademarks and trade names,  and stewardship and conservation efforts.

Commercial and Industrial Leases—We are the owner and lessor of approximately  290,000 square
feet of commercial retail and light industrial properties,  including the majority  of the restaurants and
retail outlets, buildings and activities in  the Kapalua Resort. The following summarizes information
related to our building leases as of December 31, 2013, including the total square footage of  all
properties held for lease, the average occupancy of such properties and  the range of  lease expiration
dates  for  the  various  properties  within  each  area  of  Maui  in  which  we  hold  properties  for  lease:

Kapalua Resort . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hali’imaile Town . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other West Maui . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total
Square
Footage

103,414
119,095
66,185

Average
Occupancy
Percentage

Lease
Expiration
Range

79% 2014 - 2028
88% 2014 - 2029
38% 2015 - 2019

Agricultural Leases—We are the lessor of 1,900 acres of diversified agriculture land leases in West

and Upcountry Maui.

3

Trademark and Trade Name Licensing—We currently have licensing agreements for  the use of our

registered Kapalua trademarks and trade  names with several different companies, mainly in conjunction
with the leasing of our commercial spaces  and agricultural lands.

Stewardship and Conservation—We manage the conservation of an  8,600-acre nature  and watershed
preserve in West Maui. A portion of  our stewardship and conservation efforts is  subsidized by the State
of Hawaii and other organizations.

Revenues from our Leasing segment  totaled $4.9 million, or approximately 32%  of total operating

revenues for the year ended December  31, 2013.

Our leasing operations face substantial  competition from other property  owners in  Maui  and

Hawaii.

Utilities

Our Utilities segment includes the operations  of our two  Hawaii Public Utilities  Commission-
regulated subsidiaries, Kapalua Water  Company, Ltd.  and  Kapalua Waste  Treatment  Company, Ltd. In
addition, we also manage non-potable  irrigation water  systems in West and Upcountry  Maui areas.

Kapalua Water Company, Ltd. provides potable and non-potable water  utility services  in the
Kapalua Resort area, including the Kapalua Plantation  Golf  Course  (PGC)  and the  Kapalua Bay Golf
Course (Bay Course), The Ritz-Carlton Kapalua  hotel, The Residences at Kapalua  Bay, and landscaped
common areas.

Kapalua Waste Treatment Company, Ltd. provides sewage collection and transmission services  in

the Kapalua Resort area. Waste water treatment  is processed by the  County of Maui’s facility in
neighboring Lahaina, Maui.

Non-Potable Irrigation Water Systems—We also own and operate several non-potable  ditch, reservoir

and well systems, which provide irrigation water primarily to the County  of Maui, the PGC and  Bay
Course, and agricultural users in West  and  Upcountry Maui areas.

Revenues from our Utilities segment totaled  $3.7 million, or approximately 24% of  total  operating

revenues for the year ended December  31, 2013.

Our utility services are primarily affected by the  amount  of  rainfall and the level of development

and volume of visitors in the Kapalua  Resort area. In addition, our water and sewage system
infrastructure requires periodic and ongoing  maintenance, which  in some  cases can  involve  significant
capital expenditures. Due to the regulated nature surrounding water sources and  transmission
infrastructure on Maui, we do not face  any  substantial competition  for  our water utility services.

Resort Amenities

Our Resort Amenities segment includes the operations of the  Kapalua  Club, a  private, non-equity
club providing its members special programs, access and other  privileges at  certain  of the amenities at
the Kapalua Resort including a 30,000 square foot full-service spa and  a  private pool-side  dining beach
club.

Revenues from our Resort Amenities segment  totaled $1.2 million, or  approximately 8%  of  total

operating revenues for the year ended December 31,  2013.

The viability of the Kapalua Club is principally  dependent on the overall  appeal  and success of the

Kapalua Resort. The resort faces competition from  other resort destination communities on  Maui and
other parts of Hawaii, including Kaanapali,  and Wailea.

4

Discontinued Operations

In 2013, we ceased operating the spa and beach  club in conjunction with  The  Residences  at
Kapalua Bay settlement and foreclosure sale discussed in Management’s Discussion and  Analysis  of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in Note 3 to our  Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements. In 2011, we ceased operating the PGC,  Bay Course,  and all retail businesses at the
Kapalua Resort. In December 2009, we  ceased all agriculture operations.  Our former agriculture,  golf,
retail, spa and beach club businesses  are  reported  as discontinued operations  in this annual report.

Employees

As of December 31, 2013, we had 19  employees, none of whom are members of a collective

bargaining group.

Available  Information

Our Internet address is  www.mauiland.com. Information about the Company is  also available on

www.kapalua.com. Reference in this  annual report to these website addresses does  not constitute
incorporation by reference of the information contained  on the  websites. We make available free  of
charge on or through our website our annual  reports on Form 10-K, quarterly  reports on  Form 10-Q,
current  reports on Form 8-K, and other reports  filed or furnished pursuant to Section  13(a) or 15(d) of
the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably  practicable  after we  electronically file such material with, or
furnish it to, the SEC. We also make available  through our website  all filings of  our executive officers
and  directors on Forms 3, 4 and 5 pursuant to Section 16  of the Exchange  Act. These filings are also
available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

5

Executive Officers of the Company

The  names,  ages  and  certain  biographical  information  about  our  executive  officers,  as  of  March 1,

2014, are provided below.

Warren H. Haruki (61) . Mr. Haruki has been Chief Executive Officer  of the Company  since May

2011 and Executive Chairman of our Board since January 2009. He has
been a director on our Board since 2006. Mr. Haruki has served as
President and Chief Executive Officer of Grove  Farm Company, Inc., a  land
development company located on Kauai, Hawaii since February 2005. He
was President of GTE Hawaiian Tel and Verizon Hawaii, communications
providers, from 1991 to 2003. Mr. Haruki  serves on the Board of Hawaiian
Telcom,  a communications provider, and  on the  Boards of several
privately-held companies.

Ryan L.  Churchill  (42) . Mr. Churchill  has served  as President of the Company since  February  2010

and as Senior Vice President-Corporate Development of the  Company since
March 2007. He served as Vice President-Community Development from
November 2005 to March 2007. Mr. Churchill was Vice President/Planning
of Kapalua Land Company, Ltd., the operating subsidiary responsible for
the Company’s Community Development and Resort segments,  from  June
2004 to November 2005, and Development Manager from October  2000 to
June 2004. Mr. Churchill serves on the Boards  of various non-profit
organizations.

Tim T. Esaki (51) . . . . . Mr. Esaki has served as Chief Financial Officer of  the Company since  May
2010. Mr. Esaki was appointed as the Deputy Director of the Department
of Public Works for the County of Hawaii from 2009 to April 2010. From
2003 to 2009, he was Senior Vice President of Finance and Accounting for
1250 Oceanside Partners, the developer and operator of a 1,500-acre,
master-planned, residential golf and country club community in  Kona,
Hawaii.

6

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

The following is a summary of certain  risks we face in  our business.  They  are not  the only  risks  we

face. Additional risks that we do not yet  know  of or that we currently believe are immaterial  may also
impair our business operations. If any  of the events  or circumstances described  in  the following risks actually
occurs, our business, financial condition or results of operations  could  suffer, and the  trading price of our
common stock could decline. In assessing  these risks, investors should  also refer  to the  other information
contained or incorporated by reference in our other filings with the  SEC.

Risks Related to our Business

Unstable macroeconomic market conditions could  continue  to materially  and adversely affect our operating
results.

Our operations and performance depend  significantly  on worldwide  economic conditions.
Uncertainty about current global economic conditions poses a risk to our business as consumers,
tourists and real estate investors postpone or  reduce spending in  response to tighter  credit markets,
higher  energy costs, negative financial  news, reduced consumer confidence, and/or  declines in income
or asset values, which could have a material  negative effect on  the demand for our products  and
services. Other factors that could influence demand include increases in  fuel and other energy costs,
conditions in the residential real estate and mortgage markets, interest rates, labor costs, access  to
credit on reasonable terms, and other  macroeconomic factors affecting consumer  spending  behavior.
These and other economic factors could have a material  adverse  effect on demand  for our products
and services and on our financial condition and operating  results.

In addition, although economic conditions  appear to be improving, if the current  equity and  credit
markets do not continue to improve  or  further deteriorate, or if our  expenses increase  unexpectedly, it
may become necessary for us to raise  additional capital in the  form  of a  debt or equity financing, or a
combination of the two. If economic conditions  do  not  improve, it  could make any debt or equity
financing more difficult, more costly,  and, in the case of  an equity financing, more  dilutive to our
existing stockholders. Failure to secure  any necessary financing in  a timely manner and  on favorable
terms could have a material adverse effect on  our ability  to execute our current  business  strategy, as
well as our financial performance and stock price.

Real estate investments are subject to numerous risks and we  are negatively impacted by the  downturns in the
real estate market.

We  are subject to the risks that generally relate to investments in real property because  we develop

and sell real property, primarily for residential use.  The market for  real estate on Maui  and in Hawaii
generally tends to be highly cyclical and is  typically affected by numerous changes  in local,  national and
worldwide conditions, especially economic conditions, many of  which are beyond our control, including
the following:

(cid:127) periods of economic uncertainty and  weakness  in Hawaii and in  the United  States  generally;

(cid:127) continuing high unemployment rates and low  consumer confidence;

(cid:127) the current sovereign debt crises affecting several  countries in the European Union and  concerns

about sovereign debt of the United States;

(cid:127) the general availability of mortgage  financing, including the effect of more  stringent lending

standards for mortgages and perceived  or actual changes  in interest rates;

(cid:127) increased energy costs, including fuel costs, which could  impact the  cost and desirability  of

traveling to Hawaii;

7

(cid:127) local, state and federal government regulation, including  eminent domain laws, which  may result

in a taking for less compensation than the  owner believes the property  is worth;

(cid:127) the popularity of Maui in particular and Hawaii in  general  as a vacation destination or  second

home market;

(cid:127) the relationship of the dollar to foreign currencies;

(cid:127) tax law changes, including potential  limits or elimination of the deductibility of certain  mortgage

interest expense, the application of the alternative minimum tax, real property taxes and
employee relocation expenses; and/or

(cid:127) acts of God, such as tsunamis, hurricanes, earthquakes and other natural disasters.

Changes in any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect  on our business by causing a
more significant general decline in the  number of residential  or luxury real estate sales and/or  prices of
the units available for sale, which, in  turn, could adversely affect our revenues and  profitability. During
low periods of demand, real estate product may remain in  inventory for  much  longer than expected  or
be sold at lower than expected returns,  or even at  a loss, which could impair our  liquidity and  ability to
proceed with additional land development projects and negatively affect our operating results.
Sustained adverse changes to our development plans could  result in additional impairment charges or
write-offs of deferred development costs,  which could  have a material adverse  impact  on our financial
condition and results of operations. In addition, in  the current economic environment,  equity real
estate investments may be difficult to  sell  quickly  and we may not be able to adjust our  portfolio  of
properties quickly in response to economic or  other conditions.

Because we are located in Hawaii and therefore apart  from the mainland United States, our financial results
are more sensitive to certain economic  factors, such as spending on tourism and increased fuel and  travel
costs, which may adversely impact and materially affect our business, financial condition and results of
operations.

Our businesses are dependent on attracting visitors to the  Kapalua Resort, to Maui, and  to  the
State of Hawaii as a whole. Economic factors that  affect the number of  visitors, their  length of stay or
expenditure levels will affect our financial  performance. Factors  such as the continuing worldwide
economic uncertainty and weakness,  continuing  high unemployment rates in  Hawaii and  the mainland
United States, natural disasters, substantial increases in the  cost of energy,  including fuel costs, and
events in the airline industry that may  reduce passenger capacity  or increase  traveling  costs could
reduce the number of visitors to the Kapalua  Resort  and  negatively affect a potential buyer’s demand
for our  ongoing and future property  developments, each  of which could have  a material adverse impact
on our business, financial condition and results  of operations. In  addition,  the threat, or perceived
threat, of heightened terrorist activity  in  the United  States  or  other geopolitical events,  or the spread of
contagious diseases could negatively affect a potential visitor’s choice of vacation destination or second
home location and as a result, have a material  adverse  impact on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.

We have  previously been involved in joint  ventures  and may  be subject  to risks associated with future  joint
venture  relationships.

We  have previously been involved in  partnerships, joint ventures and  other joint business
relationships, and may initiate future  joint  venture projects. We currently have a 51% interest in
Kapalua Bay Holdings, LLC (Bay Holdings), the joint venture that  constructed The  Residences at
Kapalua Bay.

8

A joint venture involves certain risks such  as:

(cid:127) our actual or potential lack of voting  control  over the joint venture;

(cid:127) our ability to maintain good relationships with our joint venture partners;

(cid:127) a venture partner at any time may have economic or business interests that are inconsistent with

ours, especially in light of the ongoing  economic uncertainty  and weakness;

(cid:127) a venture partner may fail to fund  its share of operations  and development activities, or  to  fulfill

its  other commitments, including providing accurate and timely accounting and financial
information to us; and

(cid:127) a joint venture or venture partner could lose key personnel.

In connection with our joint venture projects, we may be asked to guarantee the joint venture’s
obligations, or to indemnify third parties  in connection with a  joint venture’s contractual arrangements.
If we  were to become obligated under such arrangement  or  become subject to the risks associated with
joint venture relationships, our business,  financial condition and  results of  operations may  be  adversely
affected.

If we are unable to complete land development  projects within forecasted time and budget expectations, if at
all, our financial results may be negatively  affected.

We  intend to develop resort and other  properties as suitable opportunities arise, taking  into
consideration the general economic climate.  New  project developments have a number of risks,
including risks associated with:

(cid:127) construction delays or cost overruns  that may increase  project costs;

(cid:127) receipt of zoning, occupancy and other required governmental permits  and  authorizations;

(cid:127) development costs incurred for projects that are not  pursued to completion;

(cid:127) earthquakes, tsunamis, hurricanes,  floods, fires or other natural disasters that could adversely

impact a project;

(cid:127) defects in design or construction that may result  in additional costs to remedy or require all or  a

portion of a property to be closed during the period required to rectify the situation;

(cid:127) ability to raise capital;

(cid:127) impact of governmental assessments such as  park fees or affordable  housing requirements;

(cid:127) governmental restrictions on the nature or  size of  a project or timing of completion; and

(cid:127) the potential lack of adequate building/construction  capacity for large development  projects.

If any development project is not completed on time  or within budget,  this could have a material

adverse effect on our financial results.

If we are unable to obtain required land use entitlements at reasonable costs,  or at all,  our operating  results
would be adversely affected.

The financial performance of our Real Estate segment  is closely related to our success in obtaining
land  use entitlements for proposed development projects. Obtaining all  of the necessary entitlements to
develop a parcel of land is often difficult, costly and may take several  years,  or more, to complete. In
some situations, we may be unable to  obtain the necessary entitlements to  proceed with  a real estate
development or may be required to alter our plans for  the development. Delays  or failures to obtain
these entitlements may have a material adverse effect on our  financial results.

9

If we are unable to successfully compete with  other  developers  of real estate in Maui, our financial results
could be materially adversely affected.

Our real estate products face significant competition from other  luxury resort  real estate properties

on Maui, and from other residential property  in Hawaii and the mainland  United States. In many
cases, our competitors are larger than  us and have  greater access to capital.  If we  are unable to
compete with these competitors, our  financial results could be materially  adversely affected.

We may  be subject to certain environmental  regulations under which we may have additional liability  and
experience additional costs for land development.

Various federal, state, and local environmental laws, ordinances and  regulations  regulate our
properties and could make us liable for  the costs of removing or cleaning up hazardous  or toxic
substances on, under, or in property  we currently own  or operate or that  we previously owned or
operated. These laws could impose liability without regard to whether we knew  of, or were responsible
for, the presence of hazardous or toxic substances. The presence  of hazardous or toxic  substances, or
the failure to properly clean up such substances when present, could jeopardize our ability to develop,
use, sell or rent the real property or  to  borrow using  the real property  as collateral.  If we  arrange  for
the disposal or treatment of hazardous or  toxic wastes, we could be liable  for the  costs of removing or
cleaning up wastes at the disposal or  treatment  facility,  even if  we never  owned or operated that
facility. Certain laws, ordinances and regulations, particularly those  governing the management  or
preservation of wetlands, coastal zones  and threatened or endangered species, could limit our ability to
develop, use, sell or rent our real property.

Changes in weather conditions or natural disasters could adversely impact  and materially affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations.

Natural disasters could damage our resort and real  estate holdings, resulting in  substantial repair

or replacement costs to the extent not  covered by insurance, a reduction in property values, or a loss of
revenue, each of which could have a  material adverse impact on  our business,  financial condition  and
results of operations. Our competitors  may be affected differently  by such changes in weather
conditions or natural disasters depending on the location  of  their  assets or  operations.

Unauthorized use of our trademarks could  negatively  impact our businesses.

We  have several trademarks that we have registered in  the United  States and in  several foreign

countries. To the extent that our exclusive  use of these trademarks is  challenged,  we intend to
vigorously defend our rights. If we are  not  successful in  defending our  rights, our businesses could be
adversely impacted.

Market volatility of asset values and interest rates affect the funded status  of our  defined benefit pension  plans
and could, under certain circumstances,  have  a material adverse effect  on our financial condition.

No additional benefits are accruing for participants in  our defined benefit pension plans,  however,
the funded status for these plans as of  December  31, 2013 is a liability of approximately $20.9 million.
Contributions to our defined benefit pension plans are  expected to be approximately $2.8 million in
2014. Changes in interest rates and the  fair value of the  plan assets  drive  the annual funding short-fall
or gain and affect the minimum cash  contributions that must  be  paid to the plans. Therefore, under
certain circumstances, changes in asset values or interest rates could have  a material adverse effect on
our  financial condition.

10

Risks Related to Indebtedness and Liquidity

We have  incurred a significant amount of indebtedness  that is currently scheduled to mature  on May 1, 2014
and is subject to certain covenants under  our credit agreements. Failure to extend the maturity date of our
credit  agreements  or  satisfy  the  covenants  under  these  agreements  could  accelerate  our  repayment  obligations,
which could adversely affect our operations  and financial results and impact our ability to satisfy our other
financial obligations and ability to continue  as a going concern.

We  had $49.0 million of indebtedness  as of December 31,  2013, consisting of  a secured revolving
line of credit with Wells Fargo for up  to  $32.7 million  and  a secured term loan with  American AgCredit
for $20 million. Both credit facilities  are scheduled to mature on May 1, 2014 and have been classified
as currently due as of December 31,  2013. We are actively working with our lenders to extend  the
maturity  dates  of  our  credit  facilities.

We  have pledged a significant portion of our  real estate holdings as security for borrowings under
our  credit facilities, limiting our ability  to  borrow  additional  funds. Absent the sale of some of our real
estate holdings or refinancing, we do not expect to be able to pay the outstanding balance under  the
term loan on the maturity date.

Both of our credit agreements contain financial and other covenants that we must satisfy.  Our
ability to continue to borrow under these agreements and to fund our cash requirements depends upon
our  ability to comply with those covenants.  If  we fail to satisfy any of our covenants, each lender may
elect to accelerate our payment obligations  under such lender’s  credit agreement.

Our indebtedness  could have the effect of, among other  things, increasing our exposure to general
adverse economic and industry conditions, limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes
in our business and industry, and limiting  our ability to borrow additional funds.

Our cash outlook for the next twelve months and our ability  to continue to meet  our loan covenants and to
continue  as a going concern is highly dependent on  successfully implementing  our business initiatives and
selling real estate assets at acceptable prices.

In 2013, we had negative cash flows from operations of $3.6 million and at December 31,  2013, we

had borrowings outstanding of $49.0  million.  Our cash outlook for the next twelve months and  our
ability to continue to meet our financial  covenants is highly  dependent on selling certain  real estate
assets at acceptable prices. If we are  unable  to  meet  our loan  covenants resulting in our borrowings
becoming immediately due, we would  not  have sufficient liquidity to repay such outstanding borrowings.
In addition, we are subject to several commitments  and  contingencies that could negatively impact our
future cash flows, including required funding  of  our defined benefit pension plans and ongoing legal
disputes related to The Residences at  Kapalua Bay  project. In response to these circumstances, we  are
undertaking several business initiatives to reduce cash commitments, to generate cash flow, to reduce
costs, and to sell real estate assets and pay down our debt. However, there  can be no assurance that we
will be able to successfully achieve these  initiatives, which raises substantial doubt about our ability to
continue as a going concern.

In connection with the sale of any real  property, our credit agreements require us to pay a portion

of the proceeds received from any such sale to our  lenders as mandatory principal payments. The
amount of proceeds paid to our lenders  will reduce net proceeds  from any such sale and negatively
impact our cash flow.

11

Our stock price has been subject to significant volatility.

Risks Relating to our Stock

In 2013, the daily closing price per share of  our common stock  has ranged from a high of

$6.94 per share to a low of $3.74 per share. Our stock price  has been, and may  continue to be, subject
to significant volatility. Among others,  including the  risks and uncertainties  discussed in this annual
report, the following factors, some of  which are out of our control, may cause the market price of our
common stock to continue to be volatile:

(cid:127) our quarterly or annual earnings or those  of  other companies in  our industry;

(cid:127) actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results;

(cid:127) the relatively low volume of trading in our  stock; and

(cid:127) the lack of significant securities analysts coverage of our stock.

Fluctuations in the price of our common stock may  also be exacerbated  by economic and other

conditions in Maui in particular, or conditions  in the financial markets generally.

Trading in our stock over the last twelve months  has been limited, so investors may not be able to sell as
much stock as they want at prevailing prices.

The average daily trading volume in our common stock for the year ended December 31, 2013 was

approximately 12,439 shares. If limited trading in our stock continues,  it may be difficult for  investors
to sell their shares in the public market at  any given time at  prevailing prices. Moreover, the market
price for shares of our common stock may be made more  volatile because of the relatively low volume
of trading in our common stock. When  trading volume is low, significant  price movement can be caused
by the trading in a relatively small number of shares. Volatility  in our common stock could cause
stockholders to incur substantial losses.

We do not anticipate declaring any cash dividends on  our common stock.

We  have not declared or paid regular  cash dividends on our  common stock and do not plan  to  pay
any cash dividends in the near future.  Our current policy is to retain all funds and any earnings for use
in the operation and expansion of our business. The payment of cash dividends by us is restricted by
our  credit facilities, which contains covenants prohibiting us from  paying any  cash dividends without the
lender’s prior approval. If we do not  pay dividends, our stock may be less valuable to you  because a
return  on your investment will only occur if our  stock price appreciates.

If we do not meet the continued listing  requirements of the New York Stock Exchange  (NYSE), our common
stock may be delisted.

Our common stock is currently listed on the NYSE. On  October 23, 2012 we received  notification

from the NYSE that we were not in  compliance with the  NYSE’s continued listing standards  because
our  average market capitalization was  less than $50 million over a 30 trading-day period  and our most
recently reported shareholders’ equity was  less  than $50 million.  As prescribed by NYSE procedures,
on December 3, 2012 we submitted a business plan to the NYSE demonstrating our ability to achieve
compliance with the continued listing standards  within 18 months. On January 11, 2013, we were
informed that the  NYSE accepted our business  plan. On May 20, 2013, we were informed by the
NYSE that we returned to compliance  with  the NYSE  continued listing standards.

If we  are unable to maintain compliance with the NYSE’s continued listing standards  the NYSE

may take action to delist our common stock.  Delisting could negatively impact us by, among other
things, reducing the liquidity and market  price  of  our common stock, reducing the  number of investors

12

willing to hold or acquire our common  stock,  and  limiting  our ability to issue additional securities  or
obtain additional financing in the future, and might negatively impact  our reputation and,  as a
consequence, our business. In addition, if  our  common stock is  delisted, it  would violate the provisions
of our credit agreements.

We may  need additional funds which, if available,  could result  in  significant dilution to our stockholders, have
superior  rights to our common stock and contain  covenants that restrict our operations.

If we  continue to operate unprofitably, if unanticipated  contingencies  arise or if we  are required to

retire  any significant portion of our outstanding  indebtedness, it  will be necessary  for us  to  raise
additional capital either through public or private equity  or  debt  financing. We  cannot say  with any
certainty that we will be able to obtain  the additional needed funds on  reasonable terms, or  at all. If  we
were to raise capital through the issuance  of our common stock or securities convertible or exercisable
into our common stock, our existing  stockholders  may  suffer significant dilution. If we issued preferred
equity or debt securities, these securities could have rights superior to holders of our common stock
and could contain covenants that will  restrict  our operations. If additional  funds  are raised through a
bank credit facility or the issuance of debt securities,  the holder of such  indebtedness would  have rights
senior to the rights of equity holders  and  the terms  of such indebtedness could impose restrictions on
our  operations.

Item 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

Item 2. PROPERTIES

Most of our land was acquired from 1911 to 1932 and is carried on our  consolidated balance sheet
at cost. We believe we have clear and  unencumbered marketable title to all of our property,  except for
the following:

(cid:127) certain easements and rights-of-way that  do  not  materially affect  our use of the  property;

(cid:127) a  mortgage  on  approximately  3,100  acres  previously  used  in  agriculture  operations,  which  secures

our  $20  million term loan agreement;

(cid:127) a mortgage on approximately 880 acres of land in  West Maui primarily  within the Kapalua

Resort, which secures our $32.7 million  revolving credit facility;

(cid:127) mortgages on approximately 8,400  acres of land in West Maui, which secures  approximately

$20.9 million of our pension obligations.

(cid:127) a permanent conservation easement granted  to  The Nature  Conservancy of Hawaii,  a non-profit

corporation, covering approximately 8,600 acres of forest reserve land; and

(cid:127) a small percentage of our land in various locations on which  multiple claims of ownership  exist.

We  currently have approximately 7,800 acres that  are not in the  current development  plans or  held
for sale, and are not used in our other  operations or planned or used in  conservation. These  properties
will be evaluated in the future to determine the appropriate use  or disposition of the  acreage.

Our 21,300 acres of land in West Maui comprises a  largely contiguous parcel that extends from the

sea to an elevation of approximately  5,700 feet and  includes 10.6 miles  of ocean frontage  with
approximately 3,300 lineal feet along  sandy beaches, as well as agricultural and  grazing lands, gulches,
undeveloped coastline and heavily forested areas.  Our West Maui acreage includes approximately  900
acres within the Kapalua Resort.

13

Our 2,000 acres of land in Upcountry Maui is  situated at elevations between 1,000 and 2,000 feet
above sea level on the slopes of Haleakala, a volcanic-formed  mountain on the  island that rises above
10,000 feet in elevation.

We  own our principal executive offices located in  the Kapalua Resort. We believe our facilities are
suitable  and adequate for our business  and have  sufficient capacity for the  purposes for which they are
currently being used or intended to be used.

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On April 19, 2011, a lawsuit was filed  against the  Company’s wholly owned subsidiary Maui

Pineapple Company, Ltd. (MPC) and  several  other  Hawaii based  farms by  the Equal  Employment
Opportunity Commission (EEOC). The lawsuit alleges the farms  should be held liable for  illegal acts
by Global Horizons, Inc., a company  that had hired Thai workers to work at the  farms.  The lawsuit was
filed in the United States District Court,  District of Hawaii, as  Civil  Action  No. 11-00257.  On June 13,
2013, the EEOC filed a motion to add as  defendants Maui  Land &  Pineapple Company,  Inc. and
Hali’imaile Pineapple Company, Ltd.  On  September 10, 2013,  the Court denied the EEOC’s  motion.
MPC believes it was not involved in any  wrongdoing, disagrees with  the charges  and is defending itself.
Because this lawsuit is in its early stages and has not gone to trial, MPC is presently unable to estimate
the amount, or range of amounts, of any probable liability, if  any, related to this  matter and no
provision  has been made in the accompanying consolidated financial  statements.

On May 23, 2011, a lawsuit was filed against multiple parties including the  Company by purchasers
of two units at the project formerly known as The  Ritz-Carlton Residences at Kapalua Bay. The lawsuit
was filed in the Circuit Court of the Second Circuit, State of Hawaii  pursuant to Civil
No. 11-1-0216-(3). The lawsuit alleges deceptive  acts, intentional  misrepresentation,  concealment,  and
negligent misrepresentation, among other allegations with  regard to the  sale of the  two residential units
and  seeks  unspecified  damages,  treble  damages  and  other  relief.  We  disagree  with  the  allegations  and
we are defending ourself. Because this lawsuit  is in  its early stages and has  not  gone to trial, we  are
presently unable to estimate the amount, or range of amounts, of  any probable liability, if  any, related
to this matter and no provision has been made in  the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

On June 7, 2012, a group of owners of  12 whole-ownership  units  at  the project  formerly known as

The Ritz-Carlton Club and Residences, Kapalua Bay filed a lawsuit  against multiple parties including
the Company. We believe we have not been involved  in any wrongdoing,  disagree with  the charges and
are defending ourself. Because this lawsuit is in its early stages and has not gone to trial, we are
presently unable to estimate the amount, or range of amounts, of  any probable liability, if  any, related
to this matter and no provision has been made in  the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

On June 19, 2013, a lawsuit was filed  against  multiple parties including the  Company by several

owners of timeshare condominium interests in the  project formerly known  as The Ritz-Carlton
Residences at Kapalua Bay (Fractional Interests). The  lawsuit was filed  in the Circuit Court of the
Second Circuit, State of Hawaii, pursuant  to  Civil No. 13-1-0640-(2). The lawsuit alleges unfair and
deceptive trade practices, negligent misrepresentations, omissions, concealment,  and fraud in the
inducement among other allegations  with regards to the marketing and sales of certain Fractional
Interests  and  seeks  unspecified  damages,  treble  damages  and  other  relief.  We  disagree  with  the
allegations and are defending ourself. Because this lawsuit is  in its early stages and  has not gone to
trial, we are presently unable to estimate  the  amount,  or range of amounts, of any  probable liability, if
any, related to this matter and no provision has been  made  in the accompanying  consolidated  financial
statements.

We  are a party to various claims, complaints and other legal actions  that have arisen in the normal

course of business from time to time.  We believe the  outcome  of these  pending  legal proceedings, in

14

the aggregate, is not likely to have a material adverse effect on our operations, financial position or
cash flows.

Item 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S  COMMON EQUITY,  RELATED STOCKHOLDER

MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES  OF EQUITY  SECURITIES

Our common stock is traded on the NYSE under the symbol ‘‘MLP.’’ We did  not  declare any
dividends in 2013 and 2012. Our ability  to  declare dividends is restricted by  the terms of  our credit
agreements. We do not intend to pay  any  cash dividends  on our common stock  in the foreseeable
future. As of December 31, 2013, there  were 310 shareholders of record of our common  stock.

The following chart reflects high and  low sales prices  during  each of the quarters  in 2013 and

2012:

First

Fourth
Quarter Quarter Quarter Quarter

Second

Third

2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . High
Low

2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . High
Low

$4.29
3.74

$4.25
3.70

$4.94
3.88

$4.49
3.09

$4.68
3.86

$3.84
2.26

$6.94
4.02

$4.24
1.83

We  did not repurchase any shares of  common stock during the fiscal year ended December 31,

2013.

Securities Authorized For Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The information regarding securities authorized for  issuance  under our equity compensation  plans

is set forth in Item 12 of this annual report.

Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Because we qualify as a smaller reporting company,  as defined in Item 10(f)(1) of  Regulation S-K,

we are not required to provide the information  required by this Item.

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL  CONDITION AND

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis should  be  read in conjunction with the forward-looking
statements disclaimer set forth at the  beginning  of  this annual  report, the risk factors  set forth in
Item 1A of this annual report, and our Consolidated Financial  Statements and the Notes to those
statements set forth in Item 8 of this  annual  report.

15

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Comparison of Years Ended December  31, 2013 and 2012

CONSOLIDATED

Year Ended
December 31,

2013

2012

(in thousands except
share amounts)

Real Estate Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real Estate Cost of Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 4,513
2,420

$ 1,500
149

Gains from Real Estate Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,093

1,351

Other Operating Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other Operating Costs and Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Operating Loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest Expense, Net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Loss From Continuing Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income (Loss) From Discontinued Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

10,699
13,332

(540)
2,491

(3,031)
1,867

12,071
14,674

(1,252)
2,563

(3,815)
(787)

Net Loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net Loss Per Common Share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ (1,164) $ (4,602)
$ (0.06) $ (0.25)

We  reported a net loss of $1.2 million or $(0.06) per share  for 2013 compared to net loss of

$4.6 million or $(0.25) per share for 2012.  The difference in net loss  between years is primarily
attributable to gains from sales of real  estate assets  which are  more fully  described in  the next section
entitled ‘‘Real Estate.’’ The decrease  in  2013  other  operating revenues is  due  to  lower leasing  and
resort amenities segment revenues. The  decrease  in 2013 other operating costs  and expenses is
primarily due to the cost of The Kapalua  Bay Residences, which was less than previously estimated and
resulted in a gain equal to the difference  between the  carrying value and fair value of certain assets
conveyed  in  the  settlement.  The  settlement  is  more  fully  described  in  the  section  entitled  ‘‘Other.’’

REAL ESTATE

Year Ended
December 31,

2013

2012

(in thousands)

Real Estate Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real Estate Cost of Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$4,513
2,420

$1,500
149

Gains from Real Estate Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,093

1,351

Other Operating Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other Operating Costs and Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

921
2,657

1,045
2,734

Operating Income (Loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 357

$ (338)

In November 2013, we sold a 10-acre light  industrial zoned parcel in  West Maui for $5.4 million.
The sale resulted in a gain of $2.1 million.  Proceeds from  the sale  were  used  to  fund  our  $2.4 million
payment toward deferred maintenance  as  part of  The  Residences at Kapalua Bay settlement  and to
paydown our American AgCredit term loan. Approximately $0.9 million  of the sale price has  been
deferred until certain post-closing obligations of the Company are completed.

16

In January 2012, we sold an 89-acre former agricultural  parcel  in Upcountry Maui  for $1.5 million.

The sale resulted in a gain of $1.4 million.

Included in operating revenues for this segment  are real  estate  sales commissions from resales of

properties owned by private residents  in  the Kapalua Resort and surrounding areas by our wholly-
owned subsidiary, Kapalua Realty Company,  Ltd. Commission revenue totaled $0.6 million and
$1.0 million during 2013 and 2012, respectively. The decrease  in 2013 was  attributed to a  lower number
of closings, 25 versus 40 in 2012 and lower  average sales prices, $1.0 million  versus  $1.3 million in 2012.

We  did not have any significant real  estate  development expenditures in 2013 or  2012.

Real estate development and sales are cyclical and depend on a number of  factors. Results for one

period are therefore not necessarily indicative  of future  performance trends in this segment.

LEASING

Year Ended
December 31,

2013

2012

(in thousands)

Operating Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating Costs and Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$4,862
5,267

$5,806
5,378

Operating Income (Loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ (405) $ 428

Average Occupancy Rates:

Kapalua Resort . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Hali’imaile Town . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other West Maui . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

79%
88%
38%

81%
87%
40%

We  have contracted a third-party property management  company  to  manage our commercial
leasing portfolio. The decrease in leasing  revenues and  operating income (loss) in  2013 was primarily
due to turnover and vacancies in a few  of  our Kapalua Resort leased spaces and activities, including
the Kapalua Adventures zipline operations from March to December 2013. In August 2013,  our
Honolua Store lessee commenced construction of a $2.7 million renovation and upgrade of the
Honolua Store. The renovation was completed in January  2014. Other West Maui leasable properties
are mainly large-acre former pineapple field parcels and maintenance facilities.

Our leasing operations face substantial  competition from other property  owners in  Maui  and

Hawaii.

UTILITIES

Year Ended
December 31,

2013

2012

(in thousands)

Operating Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating Costs and Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$3,686
2,804

$3,541
2,917

Operating Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 882

$ 624

Consumption (in million gallons):

Potable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-potable/irrigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

159
753

146
682

17

We  have contracted a third-party water  engineering and management  company to manage the

operations of our wholly-owned subsidiaries: Kapalua  Water Company, Ltd. and Kapalua Waste
Treatment Company, Ltd. We have contracted a water maintenance company to manage  our
non-potable irrigation water systems in West  and  Upcountry Maui.

The increase in revenues and operating income  in 2013  is primarily  the result  of increased

consumption of potable and non-potable  water due to drier weather conditions  and higher visitor levels
in the resort.

RESORT AMENITIES

Year Ended
December 31,

2013

2012

(in thousands)

Operating Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating Costs and Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,217
891

$1,635
675

Operating Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 326

$ 960

Kapalua Club Members . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

495

533

Our Resort Amenities segment includes the operations of the  Kapalua  Club, a  private, non-equity
club providing its members special programs, access and other  privileges at  certain  of the amenities at
the Kapalua Resort including a 30,000 square foot full-service spa and  a  private pool-side  dining beach
club. The decrease in revenue and operating income in 2013 was primarily due to cessation of
contributions from The Kapalua Bay  Residences vacation owners  association for usage  of  the spa and
beach club amenities for its members. The  decline  in number of Kapalua Club members in 2013 was
primarily attributed to the uncertainties surrounding the  resolution  of The Kapalua Bay  Residences
foreclosure proceedings and other project issues.

OTHER

Operating Loss

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Year Ended
December 31,

2013

2012

(in thousands)
$(1,700) $(2,926)

Effective November 25, 2013, the Amenities purchase and sale agreements were terminated and

we and other parties associated with  the project,  including  the lenders, the  new owners of the project,
the other members of Bay Holdings,  and  the  property’s former management company, comprehensively
resolved  and settled the numerous issues and disputes  surrounding the  project (the ‘‘Settlement’’).

With respect to our portion of the Settlement, we paid $2.4  million  toward deferred maintenance

at the project, conveyed the three-acre leased parcel underlying the spa  and  the five-acre parking lot
adjacent to the project valued at $0.8  million, and  committed to pay $0.6  million  over the next  four
years in exchange for termination of  the Amenities  purchase and sale  agreements. In  addition,  we
received full release from its construction  loan  guarantees  and secured continued access to the spa and
beach club for its Kapalua Club members  at a  monthly  cost of $29,000. We previously  recorded
$4.1  million  in  accrued  contract  terminations  as  our  best  estimate  of  our  exposure  under  these
agreements. The total cost of the settlement was less than  previously estimated  and resulted in a
$0.3  million  reduction  of  accrued  contract  terminations  and  contract  terminations  expense  in  the
Consolidated Financial Statements in  Item 8 of this annual  report.  The eight acres of land  transferred
as part of the Settlement was accounted  for at fair  value  in accordance with  the accounting guidance

18

for nonmonetary transactions. Accordingly, we derecognized the spa parcel and  parking  lot parcel  and
recognized a gain of $0.8 million equal  to  the difference between  the carrying value and fair value of
those assets.

Also  included  in  operating  loss  for  this  segment  are  miscellaneous  transactions  and  unallocated

general,  administrative,  pension  and  other  post-retirement  benefit  expenses.

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

Year Ended
December 31,

2013

2012

(in thousands)

Income (Loss) From Discontinued Operations

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,867

$(787)

Our former retail, golf, spa, beach club and agriculture operations  are  reported  as discontinued
operations. Income from discontinued  operations for  2013 included a $1.9  million gain  from the sale of
a 7-acre parcel and building that was  part of our former agricultural processing  facilities  in Central
Maui and a $0.5 million reversal of accrued  income  taxes payable and interest resulting  from our
settlement with the U.S. Internal Revenue Service regarding our 2003 through 2008 Federal tax returns.
Income (loss) from discontinued operations in 2013 and 2012 also included losses  of  $0.4 million and
$1.1 million, respectively, from operating the  spa  and beach  club prior  to  us ceasing  operations  in 2013.
See Note 7 to Consolidated Financial  Statements in Item 8 of this annual report.

INTEREST EXPENSE

Interest expense was $2.5 million for 2013 compared  to  $2.6 million for 2012. Our average interest

rates on borrowings was 4.6% for 2013, compared  to  4.7% for 2012, and  average borrowings were
$51 million in 2013 compared to $47  million in 2012.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

At December 31, 2013, our total debt was $49.0 million  compared to $49.3  million at
December 31, 2012. At December 31,  2013,  we had $359,000 in cash  and  cash equivalents.

Revolving Line of Credit with Wells Fargo

We  have a $32.7 million revolving line of credit with Wells  Fargo  that is scheduled to mature  on

May 1, 2014.  Interest rates on borrowings  are at  LIBOR  plus 3.8% and the line of credit is
collateralized by approximately 880 acres  of the  Company’s real  estate  holdings at the  Kapalua Resort.
The line of credit agreement contains  various  representations, warranties, affirmative,  negative and
financial covenants and events of default  customary for  financings of this  type. Financial covenants
include a required minimum liquidity (as defined) of $4  million, maximum  total liabilities of
$175 million, and a limitation on new  indebtedness. The  credit agreement  includes predetermined
release prices for the real property securing the credit facility. There are  no commitment fees on  the
unused portion of the revolving facility.  Absent  the sale  of  some  of  our real estate holdings or
refinancing, we do not expect to be able to pay the outstanding balance  of  the revolving  line of credit
on the maturity date. As of December  31, 2013, we  had $29.0  million  of borrowings outstanding under
our  revolving line of credit.

19

Term Loan with American AgCredit

We  have a $20 million term loan with American AgCredit that  is scheduled  to  mature on May 1,

2014. The interest rate on this credit  facility is based on  the greater of 1.00%  or the 30-day LIBOR
rate, plus an applicable spread of 4.25%. The loan  agreement provides for tiered reductions  in the
applicable spread to 3.75%, subject to corresponding reductions in the principal balance of the  loan.
The loan agreement contains various  representations, warranties, affirmative,  negative and  financial
covenants and events of default customary  for financings of this type. Financial  covenants include a
required minimum liquidity (as defined) of $4 million, maximum total  liabilities  of  $175 million and  a
limitation on new indebtedness. It also requires mandatory principal repayments of 100%  of the net
proceeds of the sale of any real property  pledged as collateral for the loan  and 75%  of the net
proceeds from the sale of non-collateralized real property. In accordance with  this  provision, the
Company made principal repayments  of  $4.1 million and  $353,000 in  2013 and  2012, respectively, in
conjunction with the sales of non-collateralized real properties. The loan is collateralized by
approximately 3,100 acres of the Company’s  real estate holdings in  West Maui and Upcountry  Maui.
Absent the sale of some of our real estate  holdings or refinancing,  we  do not expect to be able to pay
the outstanding balance under the term  loan on the maturity date.

As of December 31, 2013, we are in  compliance with  the covenants under the Wells Fargo  and
American AgCredit credit facilities. We are actively working with  our lenders to extend the  maturity
dates  of  our  credit  facilities.  We  believe  the  extensions  will  be  executed  prior  to  the  May  1,  2014
maturity date.

Cash Flows

Net cash used in operating activities  for 2013  was  $3.6 million compared  to $3.8  million  in 2012.
During  2013, net borrowings from our Wells Fargo revolving line  of  credit  were $3.8 million.  In  2013,
we repaid $4.1 million of our American  AgCredit  term loan. Interest paid in 2013 and  2012 was
$2.3 million and $2.2 million, respectively.  Mandatory funding contributions to our  defined  benefit
pension plans totaled $2.4 million for both 2013 and 2012.

Future Cash Inflows and Outflows

Our plans for 2013 include the possible  sale of  certain operating and non-operating real estate

assets that could result in net cash proceeds  which would  be  partially used  to  repay outstanding
indebtedness  and for general working capital. There can  be  no assurance that we  will be able to sell
any of our real estate assets on acceptable terms, if at all.

Our cash  outlook for the next twelve months and our  ability  to  continue to meet our loan
covenants and to continue as a going concern  is highly  dependent on successfully implementing our
business initiatives and selling real estate  assets at  acceptable  prices. If we are unable to meet our loan
covenants resulting in our loan borrowings  becoming immediately due, we  would not have sufficient
liquidity to repay such outstanding borrowings.

We  are subject to several commitments and contingencies  that  could negatively impact our future
cash flows, including required funding of  our defined  benefit pension plans  and ongoing legal disputes
related to the Kapalua Bay project. These matters  are further described in Notes 9 and 15 to the
accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8  of  this  annual report. The aforementioned
circumstances raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue  as a going concern. There  can be no
assurance that we will be able to successfully achieve the initiatives discussed below in order to
continue as a going concern.

20

In response to these circumstances, we continue to undertake significant efforts to generate cash
flow by employing our real estate assets  in leasing  and  other arrangements, by the  sale of  several real
estate assets and by continued cost reduction efforts.

Contributions to our defined benefit pension plans are  expected to be approximately $2.8 million
in 2014. In June 2013, the State of Hawaii enacted a bill  directing the  DLNR, in consultation with the
Hawaiian Islands Land Trust, to engage in  the purchase of an approximately 270-acre  parcel of former
agricultural land in West Maui, known as Lipoa  Point,  from  the Company.  The bill further  requires the
DLNR to ensure to the maximum extent practicable that we use the proceeds  of the sale to fund our
defined benefit pension plans. The passage of the bill  does not obligate the DLNR to purchase the
property  or  obligate  us  to  sell  the  property.  Any  such  sale  would  be  subject  to  negotiation  between  the
parties, including the purchase price. There  is no certainty that any such sale will take  place, and even
if it  does, the amount by which our unfunded  pension fund  liabilities would be reduced is uncertain.

Our current development activities are limited to planning, permitting and other efforts to secure

and maintain project entitlements.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES  AND  ESTIMATES

Our accounting policies are described  in Summary of  Significant  Accounting Policies, Note 1 to

Consolidated Financial Statements in  Item 8 of this annual  report.  The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with generally  accepted accounting principles requires  the use of  accounting
estimates. Some of these estimates and assumptions  involve  a high level of subjectivity and judgment
and therefore the impact of a change in  these estimates and  assumptions could materially affect the
amounts reported in our financial statements.  The  accounting policies and estimates  that  we have
identified as critical to the Consolidated Financial Statements are as follows:

(cid:127) Our investment in Bay Holdings was written down to zero at December 31, 2009 to recognize an
other-than-temporary impairment and to record  losses incurred by  Bay Holdings  in the third
quarter of 2009. We and the other members of  Bay Holdings guaranteed  to the lenders
completion of the project and recourse with regard to certain acts, and we recorded $4.1  million
in other accrued liabilities on the consolidated  balance  sheet  at December 31, 2012  for our
estimated share of the completion and  recourse  guarantees. We  had  an agreement to purchase
from Kapalua Bay certain amenities of the  project, at the  actual construction cost of
approximately $35 million. In November 2013,  we and the other parties  involved in The
Residences at Kapalua Bay development reached  a comprehensive settlement of the  numerous
issues and disputes surrounding the project. As  part  of  the settlement, we were relieved of our
obligation to purchase certain amenities of  the project  for approximately $35 million  in exchange
for a $2.4 million payment toward deferred maintenance  at the  project and other consideration
including the conveyance of eight acres of land underlying and adjacent to the project. The total
cost of the settlement was less than previously  estimated  and resulted in a  $0.3 million reduction
of accrued contract terminations and  contract terminations expense in the  Consolidated
Financial Statements in Item 8 of this  annual  report. The eight acres of land transferred  as part
of the Settlement was accounted for at fair  value in accordance with  the accounting guidance for
nonmonetary transactions. Accordingly,  we derecognized the spa parcel and parking lot parcel
and recognized a gain of $0.8 million equal  to  the difference between  the carrying value and  fair
value of those assets. Our remaining unpaid balance of the settlement of $0.6 million has been
recorded in accrued contract terminations on the consolidated balance sheet at December  31,
2013.

(cid:127) Our long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment if events or circumstances indicate that the
carrying  amount of the long-lived asset may not be recoverable. These  asset impairment  loss
analyses contain uncertainties because  they require  management to make assumptions and  apply

21

considerable judgments to, among others, estimates  of  the timing and amount of future cash
flows, expected useful lives of the assets, uncertainty  about future events,  including changes  in
economic conditions, changes in operating performance,  changes in the  use of the  assets, and
ongoing costs of maintenance and improvements of  the assets; thus, the accounting  estimates
may change from period to period. If management uses different assumptions or if different
conditions occur in future periods, our  financial condition or future  operating results could be
materially impacted.

(cid:127) Deferred development costs, principally predevelopment costs and offsite development  costs

related to various projects in the planning stages  by our Real Estate segment, totaled
$7.8 million at December 31, 2013. Based on our  future  development plans  for the  Kapalua
Resort and other properties such as Pulelehua, and  Hali‘imaile Town, and the  estimated  value of
these future projects, management has concluded that  these  deferred costs  will  be  recoverable
from future development projects. The volatility of this assumption arises because of the
long-term nature of our development plans  and the  uncertainty of when or if certain parcels  will
be developed.

(cid:127) Determining pension expense for our two defined benefit pension plans  utilizes actuarial

estimates of employees’ age at retirement, retirees’  life span,  the long term rate  of  return on
investments and other factors. In addition, pension expense is sensitive  to  the discount  rate
utilized to value the pension obligation. These assumptions are subject to  the risk  of change as
they require significant judgment and have inherent uncertainties that management or its
consulting actuaries may not control or anticipate.  As of December 31, 2013, the fair value of
the assets of our defined benefit plans totaled  approximately  $45.2 million,  compared with
$42.5 million as of December 31, 2012. The recorded net  pension liability was approximately
$20.9 million as of December 31, 2013 compared to a  net pension  liability  of $30.3 million as of
December 31, 2012. The $9.4 million  decrease in net  pension liability during 2013 was mainly
attributed to an increase in the discount  rate used to determine our pension obligations and an
increase in the fair value of plan assets.

(cid:127) Stock-based compensation expense  is calculated based on  assumptions as to the expected life of
the options, price volatility, risk-free interest rate and expected forfeitures. While management
believes that the assumptions made are appropriate, current and  future compensation expense
could vary based on the assumptions  used.

(cid:127) Management calculates the income tax provision, current  and deferred income taxes  along with
the valuation allowance based upon various complex  estimates and interpretations  of income tax
laws and regulations. Deferred tax assets  are reduced by a  valuation allowance to the extent  that
it is more likely than not that they will  not  be  realized.  To the extent we begin to generate
taxable income in future years, and it  is determined the  valuation  allowance  is no  longer
required, the tax benefit for the remaining deferred  tax  assets will  be  recognized  at such time.
As of December 31, 2013, full valuation allowances of $59  million  has been established primarily
for tax credits, net operating loss carry forwards, and  accrued retirement  benefits to reduce
future  tax benefits expected to be realized.

(cid:127) Our results of operations could be affected  by  significant litigation or contingencies  adverse  to

the Company, including, but not limited to, liability claims,  environmental matters, and  contract
terminations. We record accruals for legal  matters when the information available indicates that
it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of  the  loss can be reasonably
estimated. We make adjustments to these  accruals to reflect the  impact and status of
negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of counsel  and other information and events  that  may
pertain to a particular matter. Predicting the outcome of claims and lawsuits and estimating
related costs and exposure involves substantial uncertainties that could cause actual costs to vary

22

materially from those estimates. In making determinations of likely outcomes of  litigation
matters, we consider many factors. These factors include, but are not limited to, the  nature of
specific claims, our experience with similar types  of  claims, the jurisdiction in  which the matter is
filed, input from outside legal counsel, the likelihood  of  resolving the matter through alternative
dispute resolution mechanisms and the matter’s  current status. A detailed discussion  of
significant litigation matters and contingencies is  contained  in Note 15 to our Consolidated
Financial Statements in Item 8 of this  annual  report.

IMPACT OF INFLATION AND CHANGING  PRICES

Most of the land we own was acquired from 1911  to  1932 and  is carried at cost. At  the Kapalua

Resort, some of the fixed assets were constructed and placed in  service in the mid-to-late  1970s.
Depreciation expense would be considerably higher if fixed assets were stated at current cost.

OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGMENTS

As of December 31, 2013, we did not have  any significant off-balance sheet arrangements,  as

defined  in  Item 303(a)(4)(ii)  of  SEC  Regulation S-K.

Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT  MARKET RISK

Because we qualify as a smaller reporting company, as defined in Item 10(f)(1)  of  Regulation S-K,

we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

23

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders  of
Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc.
Lahaina, Hawaii

We  have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Maui Land & Pineapple
Company, Inc. and subsidiaries (the ‘‘Company’’) as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related
consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ deficiency, and
cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the  Company’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an  opinion on  the financial  statements based  on our
audits.

We  conducted our audits in accordance with the standards  of  the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States). Those  standards require that we  plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether  the  financial  statements are free  of material misstatement.  The
Company is not required to have, nor were we  engaged to perform,  an  audit of  its internal control over
financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as  a
basis for designing audit procedures that  are  appropriate in the circumstances,  but not for the purpose
of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over  financial  reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also  includes examining, on a test basis,  evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures  in the financial statements,  assessing the  accounting principles
used and significant estimates made  by management, as well as evaluating the  overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis  for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial  statements  present fairly, in  all  material  respects, the

financial position of Maui Land & Pineapple  Company, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013
and 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years then  ended, in
conformity with accounting principles  generally  accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the
Company will continue as a going concern.  As discussed in Note 1 to the  consolidated  financial
statements, the Company’s recurring negative  cash flows from  operations  and deficiency in
stockholders’ equity raise substantial  doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going  concern.
Management’s plans concerning these  matters are also described in  Note 1  to  the consolidated financial
statements. The consolidated financial statements do not include any  adjustments that might result
from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Honolulu, Hawaii
March  20,  2014

24

MAUI LAND & PINEAPPLE COMPANY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS

Cash and cash  equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts receivable,  less  allowance of $163 and $262 for doubtful  accounts . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses  and  other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Assets held for  sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

Total Current Assets

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

PROPERTY

Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Land improvements
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Buildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Machinery  and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Construction in  progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total  Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less  accumulated  depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Net Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

OTHER  ASSETS

Deferred development costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other noncurrent assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

December 31,

2013

2012

(in thousands
except share data)

359
1,203
596
744

2,902

5,355
24,951
33,534
11,820
1,606

77,266
37,084

40,182

7,727
2,942

$

829
1,138
466
2,483

4,916

7,382
25,702
35,649
12,799
1,637

83,169
37,668

45,501

7,612
3,456

Total  Other  Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

10,669

11,068

TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 53,753

$ 61,485

LIABILITIES &  STOCKHOLDERS’  DEFICIENCY
CURRENT  LIABILITIES

Current portion of long-term  debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trade accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payroll and employee benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current  portion of accrued retirement  benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income taxes  payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current  portion of accrued contract  terminations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other accrued liabilities, including deferred  revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 49,000
995
362
443
1,421
159
2,216

$ 4,068
1,341
151
626
2,457
4,094
1,948

Total  Current Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

54,596

14,685

LONG-TERM LIABILITIES

Long-term debt
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued retirement benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued contract  terminations
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other noncurrent liabilities

Total  Long-Term Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—
20,867
475
5,046

26,388

45,200
30,394
—
5,569

81,163

COMMITMENTS &  CONTINGENCIES  (Note 15)

STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY

Common stock—no  par value, 43,000,000 shares  authorized;  18,737,384 and 18,664,068

shares issued and outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additional paid in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated  deficit
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated  other comprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

76,810
9,245
(93,594)
(19,692)

76,410
9,236
(92,430)
(27,579)

Stockholders’ Deficiency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(27,231)

(34,363)

TOTAL . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 53,753

$ 61,485

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

25

MAUI LAND & PINEAPPLE COMPANY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF  OPERATIONS
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Years Ended
December 31,

2013

2012

(in thousands except
per share amounts)

OPERATING REVENUES
Real estate

Sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Commissions and Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Leasing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Utilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Resort amenities and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 4,513
921
4,862
3,686
1,230

$ 1,500
1,045
5,806
3,541
1,679

Total Operating Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

15,212

13,571

OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES
Real estate

Cost of sales . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Leasing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Utilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Resort amenities and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
General and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Land Transferred in Settlement of Contract  Terminations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Contract Terminations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pension and other post-retirement expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss (Gain) on asset dispositions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2,420
2,084
2,906
2,225
725
2,937
(773)
(265)
2,550
888
55

149
2,135
2,852
2,280
624
3,073
—
—
2,878
1,064
(232)

Total Operating Costs and Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

15,752

14,823

Operating Loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Loss from Continuing Operations before  income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax benefit

Loss from Continuing Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations  net of income tax benefit of $144

(540)
(2,501)
10

(3,031)
—

(1,252)
(2,577)
14

(3,815)
—

(3,031)

(3,815)

and $88 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

1,867

NET LOSS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Pension Benefit Adjustment net of income taxes of $0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(1,164)
7,887

(787)

(4,602)
(4,010)

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 6,723

$ (8,612)

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE—BASIC AND DILUTED

Continuing Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Discontinued Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ (0.16) $ (0.20)
(0.05)

0.10

Net Loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ (0.06) $ (0.25)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

26

MAUI LAND & PINEAPPLE COMPANY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY

For the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012

(in thousands)

Common Stock

Shares

Amount

Additional
Paid in
Capital

Accumulated
Other

Acumulated Comprehensive

Deficit

Loss

Total

Balance, January 1, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,583 $75,933

$9,211

$(87,828)

$(23,569)

$(26,253)

Share-based compensation expense . . . .
Issuance of shares for incentive plan . . .
Vested restricted stock issued . . . . . . . .
Shares cancelled to pay tax liability . . . .
Other comprehensive loss-pension

(Note 8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

39
79
(37)

150
464
(137)

489

(464)

(4,010)

(4,602)

489
150
—
(137)

(4,010)
(4,602)

Balance, December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . 18,664 $76,410

$9,236

$(92,430)

$(27,579)

$(34,363)

Share-based compensation expense . . . .
Issuance of shares for incentive plan . . .
Vested restricted stock issued . . . . . . . .
Shares cancelled to pay tax liability . . . .
Other comprehensive income-pension

(Note 8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

33
74
(34)

133
416
(149)

425

(416)

7,887

(1,164)

425
133
—
(149)

7,887
(1,164)

Balance, December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . 18,737 $76,810

$9,245

$(93,594)

$(19,692)

$(27,231)

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

27

MAUI LAND & PINEAPPLE COMPANY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012

OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to  net  cash used  in  operating activities

Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Share  based compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gain on property  disposals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Land transferred in settlement of  contract  terminations
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes in operating  assets  and liabilities:

Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in retirement liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Trade accounts  payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income taxes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other operating  assets and liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Years Ended
December 31,

2013

2012

(in thousands)

$(1,164) $(4,602)

2,870
425
(1,668)
(773)

(65)
(1,823)
(354)
(1,036)
2

3,219
489
(232)
—

326
(2,001)
257
(309)
(920)

NET CASH USED IN OPERATING  ACTIVITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(3,586)

(3,773)

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

Purchases of property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from disposals of  property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments for  other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

NET CASH PROVIDED BY INVESTING  ACTIVITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

FINANCING  ACTIVITIES

Proceeds from long-term debt
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Payments of long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Debt and common stock issuance cost  and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED  IN)  FINANCING  ACTIVITIES . . . . . . . . . . . . .

NET DECREASE  IN  CASH  AND CASH  EQUIVALENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
CASH AND CASH  EQUIVALENTS  AT  BEGINNING OF YEAR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

(4)
3,904
(109)

3,791

7,800
(8,068)
(407)

(675)

(470)
829

(209)
425
(114)

102

5,200
(1,453)
(137)

3,610

(61)
890

CASH AND CASH  EQUIVALENTS  AT  END  OF  YEAR . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

359

$

829

Cash paid during the year:

Interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 2,335
700
$

$ 2,163
$ —

SUPPLEMENTAL NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING  ACTIVITIES:

(cid:127) Amounts included in trade accounts payable for additions to property and other investments

totaled $4,000 at December 31, 2013 and 2012.

(cid:127) Funds related to the sale of property that were held in  escrow pending the  completion  of

post-closing obligations were $0 and  $150,000 at December 31, 2013  and  2012, respectively.

(cid:127) $133,100 and $150,300 of common  stock  were  issued to certain members of the Company’s

management at December 31, 2013 and 2012,  respectively.

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

28

MAUI LAND & PINEAPPLE COMPANY, INC. & SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1.

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT  ACCOUNTING  POLICIES

CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated financial statements  include the accounts  of Maui Land &  Pineapple
Company, Inc. and its principal subsidiary Kapalua Land Company, Ltd. and  other  subsidiaries
(collectively, the ‘‘Company’’). The Company’s  principal operations include the development,  sale and
leasing of real estate, water and waste transmission  services, and the management of  a private  club
membership program at the Kapalua  Resort. During 2013,  the Company  ceased  operating the spa and
beach club at the Kapalua Resort. The Company’s former retail,  golf, spa,  beach club and agriculture
operations are reported as discontinued  operations (Note 7). Significant  intercompany balances  and
transactions have been eliminated.

LIQUIDITY

The Company reported net loss of $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. Included in

the net loss was a profit of $2.1 million  recognized from  the sale  of  a real  estate  parcel in November
2013 and a $1.9 million gain from the  sale of a  7-acre parcel and building  in June 2013 that was part of
the Company’s former agricultural processing facilities. The Company reported negative cash  flows
from operations of $3.6 million for the  year  ended December 31, 2013.  The  Company had an excess of
current liabilities over current assets  of $51.7 million and a stockholders’ deficiency of $27.2 million at
December 31, 2013.

The Company has two primary credit  facilities that have financial covenants  requiring among other
things, a minimum of $4 million in liquidity (as defined), a maximum of  $175 million in total liabilities,
and a limitation on new indebtedness.  The Company  has pledged a significant  portion of its real estate
holdings  as  security  for  borrowings  under  these  credit  facilities.  Both  facilities  are  scheduled  to  mature
in May  2014 and have been classified  as currently due. The Company  made  a mandatory  principal
repayment of $4.1 million during the year  ended December 31, 2013  under terms of its American
AgCredit credit facility.

In November 2013, the Company and the other parties  involved  in The Residences at Kapalua Bay
development reached a comprehensive settlement of the  numerous issues and  disputes surrounding  the
project. These matters are further described  in Note 3.

The Company’s cash outlook for the  next twelve months and its  ability  to  continue to meet its loan

covenants is highly dependent on selling certain  real estate assets  at acceptable prices.  If the Company
is unable to meet its loan covenants,  borrowings under  the Company’s credit facilities may become
immediately due, and the Company would  not have sufficient  liquidity to repay such  outstanding
borrowings. In addition, the Company is  subject to several commitments and contingencies that could
negatively impact its future cash flows, including required funding of the  Company’s defined benefit
pension plans and ongoing legal disputes  related to The Residences  of Kapalua Bay project. These
matters are further described in Notes  9  and 15.

The aforementioned circumstances raise  substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue
as a going concern. There can be no assurance that the Company will  be  able to successfully achieve its
initiatives summarized below in order  to  continue as a  going concern. The accompanying  condensed
consolidated financial statements have  been  prepared  assuming the Company  will  continue as a  going
concern and do not include any adjustments that might  result should the Company  be  unable to
continue as a going concern.

29

In response to these circumstances, the Company continues to undertake efforts to generate cash

flow by employing its real estate assets  in leasing  and  other arrangements, by the  sale of  several real
estate assets, and by continued cost reduction efforts. The  Company is actively working  with its lenders
to extend the maturity dates of its credit facilities.

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

Comprehensive income (loss) includes all changes in  stockholders’ deficiency, except those
resulting from capital stock transactions. Comprehensive income (loss) includes  the pension  benefit
adjustment (Note 9).

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

Cash and cash equivalents include cash  on hand and deposits  in banks.

ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS

Receivables are recorded net of an allowance  for doubtful  accounts. The Company estimates

future write-offs based on delinquencies,  credit ratings,  aging trends,  and  historical experience. The
Company believes the allowance for  doubtful  accounts is  adequate to cover anticipated  losses; however,
significant deterioration in any of the  aforementioned factors or in  general  economic conditions could
change these expectations, and accordingly, the Company’s financial condition and/or its future
operating results could be materially  impacted. Credit  is extended after  evaluating creditworthiness and
no collateral is generally required from customers.

ASSETS HELD FOR SALE

Assets  are reported as held for sale when they  are being actively marketed and available for
immediate sale in their present condition, the sale is probable  and the transfer of the asset  is expected
to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year.  Assets held  for sale are  stated  at the
lower of net book value or estimated  fair  value less cost to sell.

DEFERRED DEVELOPMENT COSTS

Deferred development costs consist primarily  of  design, entitlement and permitting fees and real

estate development costs related to various  planned projects.  Deferred costs  are written off  if
management decides that it is no longer  probable that the Company  will proceed with the related
development project.

PROPERTY  AND DEPRECIATION

Property is stated at cost. Major replacements,  renewals and betterments  are  capitalized  while
maintenance and repairs that do not improve or extend  the life  of  an asset are  charged to expense as
incurred. When property is retired or  otherwise disposed of,  the  cost of the  property and  the related
accumulated depreciation are written off  and  the resulting gains or losses are  included in income.
Depreciation is provided over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets  using the straight-line
method generally over three to 40 years.  Depreciation expense  was $2,550,000 and $2,878,000  for the
years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012,  respectively.

LONG-LIVED ASSETS

Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of an  asset  may  not  be  recoverable. When such  events or changes
occur, an estimate of the future cash  flows expected to result from the use  of  the assets and their

30

eventual disposition is made. If the sum  of such expected future cash flows (undiscounted and  without
interest charges) is less than the carrying  amount of the  asset,  an impairment loss is  recognized in an
amount by which the assets’ net book values exceed  their fair value. These asset impairment loss
analyses require management to make  assumptions and apply considerable  judgments  regarding, among
others, estimates of the timing and amount of future cash flows,  expected  useful lives  of  the assets,
uncertainty about future events, including changes in  economic conditions,  changes in operating
performance, changes in the use of the  assets, and  ongoing  cost of maintenance  and improvements of
the assets, and thus, the accounting estimates may change from period to period. If management uses
different assumptions or if different conditions occur  in future periods,  the Company’s financial
condition or its future operating results could be materially impacted. There were no impairment
charges recorded in 2013 or 2012.

EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

The Company’s policy is to fund pension costs at a level at least equal  to  the minimum amount
required under federal law, but not more than the maximum amount deductible for federal income tax
purposes.

The under-funded status of the Company’s  defined benefit  post-retirement plans is recorded  as a
liability in its balance sheet and changes in the funded status of the  plans are recorded in the  year  in
which  the changes occur, through comprehensive  income (loss). A pension asset or liability is
recognized for the difference between the  fair value of plan assets and the projected benefit  obligation
as of  year-end.

Deferred compensation plans for certain management  employees provide for specified payments
after retirement. The present value of estimated payments to be made is  accrued  over the period of
active  employment.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

Real estate revenues are recognized in  the period  in which  sufficient cash has been  received,

collection of the balance is reasonably assured and risks  of  ownership  have passed to the  buyer.

Lease revenues are recognized on a straight-line  basis over the terms of the  leases. Also included

in lease income are certain percentage rents determined in accordance  with the terms of the leases.
Lease income arising from tenant rents that  are contingent  upon the  sales of  the tenant exceeding a
defined threshold are recognized only after  the defined sales  thresholds are  achieved.

Other revenues are recognized when delivery  has occurred  or  services have been  rendered, the

sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably  assured.

OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES

Real estate, leasing, utilities, resort amenities, and general and administrative costs and  expenses

are reflected exclusive of depreciation and pension and other  post-retirement expenses.

INCOME TAXES

The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions in  accordance with the  provisions of  Financial

Accounting Standard Board (FASB)  Accounting Standards  Codification (ASC) Topic 740. This
interpretation prescribes a recognition  threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement
recognition and measurement of a tax  position taken  or expected to be taken in a tax return (Note 12).

The Company’s provision for income  taxes is calculated  using  the liability method. Deferred

income taxes are provided for all temporary differences between the financial statement and income tax

31

bases of assets and liabilities using tax rates enacted  by  law or regulation. A valuation  allowance is
established for deferred income tax assets if  management believes  that it  is more likely than not that
some portion or all of the asset will not be realized through future taxable income.

SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION  PLANS

The Company accounts for share-based compensation, including  grants of employee stock options,

as compensation expense over the service period (generally the vesting period) in the consolidated
financial statements based on their fair values. The impact  of  forfeitures that may occur  prior to vesting
is estimated and considered in the amount recognized.

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements  in conformity with  accounting principles generally accepted

in the United States of America (GAAP)  requires management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities  and disclosure of  contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of  revenues
and expenses during the reporting periods.  Future actual  amounts could  differ  from these  estimates.

RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

Factors that could adversely impact the  Company’s future operations or financial results  include,
but are not limited to the following: continued economic weakness and uncertainty in  Hawaii and  the
mainland United States; continued high  unemployment rates  and low consumer confidence;  the current
sovereign debt crises affecting several  countries in the  European Union and  concerns about sovereign
debt in the United States; the general availability of mortgage financing, including  the effect of more
stringent lending standards for mortgages and perceived or  actual changes in interest  rates; risks related
to the Company’s investments in real  property,  the value and salability of which could be impacted by
the economic factors discussed above or  other factors; the  popularity of Maui in  particular  and Hawaii
in general as a vacation destination or  second-home market;  increased energy costs,  including fuel
costs, which effect tourism on Maui and Hawaii  generally; untimely completion of land  development
projects within forecasted time and budget expectations; inability to obtain land use  entitlements at  a
reasonable cost or in a timely manner; unfavorable legislative decisions by state and local governmental
agencies; the cyclical market demand for  luxury real estate on  Maui  and in Hawaii generally; increased
competition from other luxury real estate developers on  Maui  and in Hawaii generally;  failure of future
joint venture partners to perform in accordance with  their contractual  agreements;  environmental
regulations; acts of God, such as tsunamis, hurricanes, earthquakes and  other natural  disasters;  the
Company’s location apart from the mainland United States,  which results in the  Company’s financial
performance being more sensitive to  the  aforementioned economic risks; failure  to  comply with
restrictive financial covenants in the Company’s credit  arrangements;  and  an inability to achieve the
Company’s short and long-term goals and  cash flow requirements.

ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION COSTS

The Company accrues for environmental remediation costs  when such losses are  probable and
reasonably estimable. Such accruals are adjusted as  further  information develops or  circumstances
change. When the remediation cost is expected to be incurred within  a relatively short period  of  time,
the obligations are not discounted to  their present value. At December 31,  2013 and 2012, the
Company had accrued for $165,000 and $675,000,  respectively, of  remediation costs.

32

NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In February 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards  Update  (ASU)  No. 2013-02,
Comprehensive Income (Topic 220)—Reporting  of  Amounts Reclassified Out  of Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income. This ASU adds new disclosure requirements for items  reclassified  out of
accumulated other comprehensive income  and requires entities  to  present information  about significant
items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component either  (1) on the face
of the statement where net income is presented  or (2) as a separate disclosure  in the notes to the
financial statements. The amendments  in this ASU  should be applied prospectively, and are effective
for  fiscal  years,  and  interim  periods  within  those  years,  beginning  after  December  15,  2012.  Amounts
reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income related  to  defined  benefit pension  items
were $7,887 and $(4,010) for the years  ended December 31, 2013 and 2012,  respectively. The adoption
of this guidance did not have a material impact on  the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON  SHARE

Basic income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income or  loss by the weighted-average

number of common shares outstanding. Diluted income (loss)  per  share is computed similar to basic
income (loss) per share except that the denominator  is increased to include the  number of additional
common shares that would have been outstanding if the  dilutive potential common  shares from  share-
based compensation arrangements had been issued.

Potentially dilutive shares arise from non-qualified  stock  options to purchase  common stock and

non-vested restricted stock. The treasury stock method  is applied to determine the number of
potentially dilutive shares for non-vested  restricted stock  and stock options assuming that the shares of
non-vested restricted stock are issued  for  an amount based  on the grant  date market price  of  the shares
and that the dilutive outstanding stock  options are  exercised. The Company  reports a loss from
continuing operations in both 2013 and  2012, and therefore these amounts were excluded from  the
calculation of earnings per share because the  effect would be anti-dilutive.

Year Ended
December 31,

2013

2012

Basic and diluted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Potentially dilutive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

18,702,396
110,193

18,618,356
173,137

2. ASSETS HELD FOR SALE AND  REAL ESTATE  SALES

At December 31, 2013, assets held for sale consists of a  4-acre  parcel  and building that serves  as

the maintenance facility for the Kapalua  Plantation  Golf Course.

In November 2013, the Company sold a  10-acre light industrial zoned  parcel  in West Maui for
$5.4 million. The sale resulted in a gain of  $2.1 million.  Proceeds from the sale  were used to fund the
Company’s $2.4 million payment toward  deferred maintenance as part of The Residences at Kapalua
Bay settlement and to paydown its American  AgCredit  term loan. Approximately  $0.9 million of the
sale price has been deferred until certain post-closing  obligations of the Company are completed.

In June 2013, the Company sold a 7-acre  parcel  and  building that was the last of its former
agricultural processing facilities in Central Maui for $4.0  million.  The  sale resulted in a  $1.9 million
gain included in discontinued operations.

In January 2012, the Company sold an 89-acre former agricultural parcel in Upcountry Maui for

$1.5 million. The sale resulted in a gain of  $1.4 million.

33

3.

INVESTMENT IN AFFILIATES

The Company has a 51% ownership interest in  Kapalua Bay Holdings, LLC  (Bay Holdings), which
is the sole member of Kapalua Bay LLC (Kapalua Bay). The other members of Bay Holdings are  MH
Kapalua Venture, LLC, 34%, and ER Kapalua  Investors Fund, LLC, 15%.  Bay Holdings  is not a
variable interest entity, as defined in  GAAP. The Company accounts for  its investment in Bay Holdings
using the equity method of accounting because, although it has the  ability to exercise significant
influence over operating and financial policies, it does  not  control Bay  Holdings through a majority
voting interest or other means. Under  the LLC agreement, major decisions require the  approval of
either 75% or 100% of the membership  interests. The Company  has been designated  as the managing
member of Bay Holdings. Profits and losses  of  Bay Holdings were allocated  in proportion to the
members’ ownership interests, which approximated  the estimated cash  distributions to the members.

Kapalua Bay constructed a residential and  timeshare  development on  land that it owned at the site

of the former Kapalua Bay Hotel, and a spa on  an adjacent parcel of land that was owned by the
Company and leased to Kapalua Bay.  As a result of the 2009 losses incurred by Bay Holdings, the
Company’s carrying value of its investment in Bay Holdings was written down to zero  in 2009. The
Company will not recover any amounts  from its investment in  Bay Holdings  because all operations of
Kapalua Bay have ceased. Therefore,  the  Company will not recognize any additional equity in  the
earnings (losses) of Bay Holdings. The  Company had made cash contributions to Bay Holdings of
$53.2 million and non-monetary contributions of land valued at $25 million.

The Company had an agreement to purchase  from Kapalua Bay certain amenities of  the project,

including the spa, a beach club and a sundry store, at the actual construction  cost of approximately
$35 million (the ‘‘Amenities Purchase  and  Sale Agreements’’).

Kapalua Bay had a construction loan agreement that matured on August 1, 2011. The loan was
collateralized by the project assets including  the land  that is was owned by  Kapalua  Bay that underlies
the project. The Company and the other  members of Bay  Holdings had guaranteed to the lenders
completion of the project and recourse with regard to certain acts, but had  not  guaranteed repayment
of the loan. On March 13, 2012, the  lenders notified Kapalua Bay  that the loan was in  default and on
June 13, 2012, the  lenders filed for foreclosure against Kapalua Bay. The foreclosure was completed  on
June 13, 2013 and the loan collateral  including the  unsold inventory,  leasehold spa improvements, and
the Amenities Purchase and Sale Agreements between the Company  and  Kapalua Bay, were
transferred to a firm affiliated with one  of the  two remaining lenders. Other  than the  transfer  of  the
Purchase  and  Sale  Agreements,  the  foreclosure  proceeding  does  not  directly  impact  the  Company’s
operating results.

Because the Company did not have sufficient liquidity to purchase the amenities at the actual

construction cost of approximately $35 million, it had been actively negotiating  with the lenders and
new owners of the project to resolve  its commitments  under the  Amenities purchase and sale
agreements.

Effective November 25, 2013, the Amenities purchase and sale agreements were terminated and
the Company and other parties associated  with  the project,  including  the lenders, the  new owners of
the project, the other members of Bay Holdings,  and  the property’s former  management company,
comprehensively resolved and settled  the numerous issues  and disputes  surrounding the project (the
‘‘Settlement’’).

With respect to its portion of the Settlement, the  Company paid $2.4  million toward deferred
maintenance at the project, conveyed  the three-acre  leased parcel  underlying the  spa  and the  five-acre
parking lot adjacent to the project valued  at  $0.8 million, and committed to pay  $0.6 million over the
next four years in exchange for termination of the Amenities purchase and  sale agreements. In
addition, the Company received full release from its construction loan guarantees and secured

34

continued access to the spa and beach  club for its Kapalua Club members  at a monthly cost of $29,000.
The Company previously recorded $4.1  million  in accrued contract terminations as its best estimate of
its  exposure under these agreements. The  total cost  of the settlement  was less than previously estimated
and  resulted  in  a  $0.3  million  reduction  of  accrued  contract  terminations  and  contract  terminations
expense in the accompanying consolidated  financial statements. The eight acres of land  transferred as
part of the Settlement were accounted for  at fair value in accordance with the accounting  guidance for
nonmonetary transactions. Accordingly,  the Company derecognized the spa parcel and parking lot
parcel and recognized a gain of $0.8  million equal  to  the difference between the  carrying value and  fair
value of those assets.

Summarized balance sheet and operating information for Bay Holdings as  of  December 31, 2013

and 2012 and for the years then ended are as follows:

2013

2012

Restricted cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Real estate inventories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other assets, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 2,282
—
41

3,241
149,774
10,712

(in thousands)
$

Total Assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 2,323

$ 163,727

Construction loan payable and other  member  loans . . . . . . . . .
Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ — $ 375,441
46,408

8,362

Total Liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 8,362

$ 421,849

Members’ Deficiency . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(6,039) $(258,122)

Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Costs and Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2013

2012

(in thousands)

$

14
(252,056)

(in thousands)
(745)
50,827

$

Net Income (Loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 252,070

$(51,572)

Costs and expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 includes the recognition of Kapalua
Bay’s gain on foreclosure of approximately $262  million resulting from $328  million of  debt forgiveness.
As discussed above, the Company’s carrying value of its investment in Bay Holdings was written down
to zero in the past, and the Company  will not recognize any additional equity  in the earnings  (losses)
of Bay Holdings.

4.

PROPERTY

Land

Most the Company’s 23,300 acres of  land  was acquired from 1911 to 1932 and  is carried on  the
consolidated balance sheet at cost. Approximately 21,300 acres of land are located in  West Maui  and
comprise a largely contiguous parcel  that extends from the sea to an elevation of  approximately 5,700
feet  and  includes  approximately  900  acres  within  the  Kapalua  Resort.

Land Improvements and Buildings

Land Improvements and buildings are  largely  comprised of  restaurants, commercial retail and light

industrial  buildings located at the Kapalua  Resort and used in the Company’s leasing operations. Some of
the buildings and land improvements were constructed and placed in  service in the mid-to-late 1970s.
Depreciation  expense would be considerably higher if fixed assets were stated at current cost.

35

Machinery and Equipment

Machinery  and  equipment  are  mainly  comprised  of  zipline  course  equipment  installed  in  late  2000

at  the  Kapalua  Resort  and  used  in  the  Company’s  leasing  operations.

Construction in Progress

Construction  in  progress  is  comprised  primarily  of  a  potable  water  well  that  was  drilled  and  tested

in Upcountry Maui but has not been  placed into service.

5. LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt at December 31, 2013 and 2012  consisted of the  following:

Wells Fargo revolving loans, 3.99% and 4.05%,  respectively . . . . .
American AgCredit term loan, 5.00% and 5.25%, respectively . . .

$29,000
20,000

$25,200
24,068

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less current portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

49,000
49,000

49,268
4,068

Long-term debt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ — $45,200

2013

2012

(in thousands)

WELLS FARGO

The Company has a $32.7 million revolving line  of credit with Wells Fargo that is  scheduled to
mature on May 1, 2014. Interest rates  on  borrowings are  at LIBOR plus 3.8% and  the line  of  credit is
collateralized by approximately 880 acres  of the  Company’s real  estate  holdings at the  Kapalua Resort.
The line of credit agreement contains  various  representations, warranties, affirmative,  negative and
financial covenants and events of default  customary for  financings of this  type. Financial covenants
include a required minimum liquidity (as defined) of $3  million, maximum  total liabilities of
$175 million, and a limitation on new  indebtedness. The  credit agreement  includes predetermined
release prices for the real property securing the credit facility. There are  no commitment fees on  the
unused portion of the revolving facility.  Absent  the sale  of  some  of  its  real  estate holdings or
refinancing, the Company does not expect  to be able to pay the  outstanding balance of the revolving
line of credit  on the maturity date.

AMERICAN AGCREDIT

The  Company  has  a  $20  million  term  loan  with  American  AgCredit  that  is  scheduled  to  mature  on

May 1, 2014.  The interest rate on this  credit facility is based on the greater of 1.00%  or the 30-day
LIBOR rate, plus an applicable spread  of  4.25%.  The  loan agreement  provides for  tiered  reductions in
the applicable spread to 3.75%, subject to corresponding reductions in the principal balance of  the
loan. The loan agreement contains various representations, warranties, affirmative, negative and
financial covenants and events of default  customary for  financings of this  type. Financial covenants
include a required minimum liquidity (as defined) of $4  million, maximum  total liabilities of
$175 million and a limitation on new  indebtedness. It  also requires  mandatory principal  repayments of
100% of the net proceeds of the sale  of any real property pledged as collateral for  the loan and tiered
mandatory principal repayments based on predetermined percentages ranging from 10% to 75% of the
net proceeds from the sale of non-collateralized real property. In accordance  with this provision,  the
Company made principal repayments  of  $4.1 million and  $0.4 million in 2013 and  2012, respectively,  in
conjunction with the sales of non-collateralized real properties. The loan is collateralized by
approximately 3,100 acres of the Company’s  real estate holdings in  West Maui and Upcountry  Maui.

36

Absent the sale of some of its real estate  holdings or refinancing,  the Company does not expect to be
able to pay the outstanding balance under  the term  loan on the maturity date.

As of December 31, 2013, the Company is in compliance with  the covenants under the Wells Fargo
and American AgCredit credit facilities. The  Company is actively  working  with its lenders  to  extend the
maturity date of its credit facilities.

6.

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

GAAP establishes a framework for measuring fair value,  and requires  certain disclosures  about fair

value measurements to enable the reader of the financial statements to assess  the inputs used to
develop those measurements by establishing a hierarchy  for  ranking the quality and reliability of the
information used to determine fair values. GAAP requires that financial assets and  liabilities  be
classified and disclosed in one of the  following three categories:

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active  markets for identical assets or  liabilities.

Level 2: Observable market based inputs or unobservable  inputs that are corroborated by market data.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.

In 2013, eight acres of land were transferred  as part  of the Settlement and were  accounted for  at
fair value in accordance with the accounting guidance for nonmonetary transactions.  Accordingly,  the
Company derecognized the spa parcel  and  parking lot parcel and recognized  a gain of $0.8  million
equal  to  the  difference  between  the  carrying  value  and  fair  value  (based  on  Level  3  inputs)  of  those
assets.

The fair value of receivables and payables approximate  their carrying value due to the short-term
nature of the instruments. The valuation is  based on settlements of similar  financial  instruments all of
which  are short-term in nature and are generally settled at or near  cost. The fair  value of  debt was
estimated based on borrowing rates currently available to the Company for  debt with similar terms and
maturities. The carrying amount of debt at  December 31,  2013 and  2012 was $49,000,000 and
$49,268,000, respectively, which approximated fair  value.  The  fair value of debt has  been classified as
level  2 measurements, respectively. See  Note 9  for  the classification of the  fair value  of pension  assets.

7. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

The Company ceased spa operations in  June 2013 and beach club operations in  September 2013 in

conjunction with the conclusion of The Residences at Kapalua Bay foreclosure proceedings  and the
Settlement. In September 2011, the Company  ceased all retail operations  at the  Kapalua  Resort. In
March 2011, the Company ceased operating the two championship golf  courses  at the Kapalua  Resort.
In December 2009, the Company ceased  all agriculture  operations. Accordingly, the operating  results
including any gains or losses from the disposal of assets related to these  former operations  have been
reported as discontinued operations in  the accompanying consolidated financial statements. Income
from discontinued operations for 2013  included a $1.9 million gain from the sale  of  a 7-acre parcel  and
building that was part of the Company’s  former  agricultural processing  facilities in Central Maui and a
$0.5 million reversal of accrued income taxes payable and interest resulting  from the IRS  settlement.
Income (loss) from discontinued operations in 2013 and 2012 also includes losses of $0.4  million  and
$1.1 million, respectively, from operating the  spa  and beach  club prior  to  us ceasing  such operations in
2013.

37

The revenues and income (loss) before income tax benefits  for  the discontinued operations were as

follows:

Revenues

2013

2012

(in thousands)

Spa & Beach Club . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,294

$ 2,592

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,294

$ 2,592

Income (loss) from Discontinued  Operations

Spa & Beach Club . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Golf courses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Retail . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Agriculture . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ (443) $(1,141)
(89)
(3)
358

—
(1)
2,167

Total

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$1,723

$ (875)

8. LEASING ARRANGEMENTS

LESSEE

The Company has various operating  leases which  expire in  2016 and 2017. Total rental  expense
under operating leases was $43,000 in  2013 and $18,000 in 2012. Future  minimum rental payments  due
under operating leases total $7,000 in  2014, $7,000 in 2015,  $6,000 in 2016,  and $1,000 in 2017.

LESSOR

The Company leases land primarily to agriculture operators and  space in commercial  buildings,
primarily to retail tenants. These operating leases generally  provide for minimum rents and, in  some
cases, licensing fees and percentage rentals based on  tenant revenues. In addition, the leases generally
provide for reimbursement of common  area maintenance  and  other expenses. Total rental income
under these operating leases was as follows:

Minimum rentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Percentage rentals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Licensing fees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other (primarily common area recoveries) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$2,684
562
637
979

$2,639
1,182
667
1,318

$4,862

$5,806

2013

2012

(in thousands)

Property at December 31, 2013 and 2012  includes leased  property of $45,165,000  and $46,778,000,

respectively (before accumulated depreciation  of $20,075,000 and $19,915,000, respectively).

Future minimum rental income receivable during the next five years and  thereafter is as  follows:

2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$2,585
2,504
1,990
1,906
1,479
8,186

(in thousands)

38

9. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

The Company had defined benefit pension plans covering substantially  all  full-time, part-time and

intermittent employees. Effective as of  January 1, 2010,  the defined  benefit pension plan  covering
non-bargaining salaried employees was  frozen, and effective January 1, 2011, pension benefits  for
non-bargaining hourly employees were  also  frozen and no further pension benefits will accrue to the
affected employees. Effective April 1, 2011,  the Company did not  have any active employees  accruing
pension benefits as the remaining employees who were covered under  the Pension  Plan  for Bargaining
Unit and Hourly Employees (Bargaining  Plan)  were terminated when the Company’s golf course
operations ceased.

The measurement date for the Company’s  benefit plan  disclosures is December 31st of each year.

The changes in benefit obligations and  plan assets  for 2013 and 2012, and the  funded  status of  the
plans, and assumptions used to determine benefit  information at  December  31, 2013 and 2012 were as
follows:

Change in benefit obligations:

Benefit obligations at beginning of year . . . . .
Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Actuarial (gain) loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Benefit obligations at end of year . . . . . . . . .

Change in plan assets:

Fair value of plan assets at beginning  of  year .
Actual return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Employer contributions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Fair value of plan assets at end of year . . . . .

Funded status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Accumulated Benefit Obligations . . . . . . . . . . .

Weighted average assumption used to  determine

benefit obligations at December 31:

Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected long-term return on plan assets . . . . .
Rate of compensation increase . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Pension Benefits

2013

2012

(in thousands)

$

72,824
—
2,880
(5,193)
(4,420)

66,091

42,518
4,691
2,389
(4,420)

45,178

66,645
—
3,189
7,218
(4,228)

72,824

39,053
5,336
2,357
(4,228)

42,518

(20,913) $

(30,306)

66,091

$

72,824

$

$

$

4.68% - 4.92% 3.87% - 4.16%

7.00%
n/a

7.50%
n/a

The amounts recognized for pension benefits on  the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as  of
December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows and are  included within current  and noncurrent portion
of accrued retirement benefits::

Current Liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Noncurrent Liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2013

2012

(in thousands)
$
306
20,607

$
306
30,000

Net amounts recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$20,913

$30,306

39

Amounts recognized for pension benefits in accumulated other comprehensive loss  (before income

tax effect of $0) at December 31, 2013 and 2012 are  as follows:

Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$19,692

$27,579

Net amounts recognized . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$19,692

$27,579

2013

2012

(in thousands)

In  2014,  $582,000  of  the  net  loss  included  in  accumulated  other  comprehensive  loss  at
December 31, 2013 is expected to be  recognized as a  component  of  net periodic pension cost.

Components of net periodic benefit cost  and other  amounts recognized  in other comprehensive

income (loss) were as follows:

Pension Benefits

2013

2012

(in thousands)

Pension and other benefits:

Interest cost
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected return on plan assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recognized net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 2,880
(2,906)
914

$ 3,189
(2,864)
739

Net expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

888

$ 1,064

Other Changes in Plan Assets and Benefit Obligations
Recognized in Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):
Net loss
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Recognized loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(6,973) $ 4,749
(739)

(914)

Total recognized (gain) loss in other comprehensive  income

(loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$(7,887) $ 4,010

2013

2012

Weighted average assumptions used to  determine

net periodic cost:

Pension benefits:

Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected long-term return on plan assets . . . . .
Rate of compensation increase . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3.87% - 4.16% 4.79% - 4.98%

7.00%
n/a

7.50%
n/a

The expected long-term rate of return  on plan assets was based on a building-block  approach.
Historical markets are studied and long-term historical  relationships between equities  and fixed income
are preserved consistent with the widely accepted capital  market principle that assets with higher
volatility generate a greater return over the long  run. Current  market  factors, such as inflation and
interest rates, are evaluated before long-term  capital markets  are determined. Diversification and
rebalancing of the plan assets are properly  considered as  part  of establishing the  long-term portfolio
returns.

40

The fair values of the Company’s pension plan  assets at December 31, 2013 and 2012, by asset

category, were as follows:

AHGT Pooled equity funds . . . . . . . . . . .
AHGT Pooled fixed income funds . . . . . .
Cash management funds . . . . . . . . . . . . .

AHGT Pooled equity funds . . . . . . . . . . .
AHGT Pooled fixed income funds . . . . . .
Cash management funds . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2013 Fair Value Measurements (in thousands)

Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)

Significant Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)

$—
—
—

$—

$25,061
19,160
957

$45,178

Total

$25,061
19,160
957

$45,178

2012 Fair Value Measurements (in thousands)

Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)

Significant Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)

$—
—
—

$—

$23,706
17,671
1,141

$42,518

Total

$23,706
17,671
1,141

$42,518

Aon Hewitt Group Trust (AHGT) Pooled  equity and  fixed income funds: Pooled equity and fixed

income funds consist of various AHGT  Funds offered  through a  private placement. The units  are
valued  daily using the net asset value  (NAV). The NAVs are based on  the fair value of each fund’s
underlying investments. Level 1 assets  are  priced using quotes for trades occurring  in active markets for
the identical asset. Level 2 assets are  priced using observable inputs for  the asset (for  example, interest
rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted  intervals, volatilities, prepayment  speeds, loss
severities, credit risks, and default rates)  or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by
observable market data by correlation  or  other means (market-corroborated  inputs).

An administrative committee consisting of certain  senior management employees administers the

Company’s defined benefit pension plans.  The pension plan  assets are allocated among approved asset
types based on the plans current funded status and other  characteristics  set by the administrative
committee, and subject to liquidity requirements of the  plans.

The Company expects to contribute $2.8 million to its  defined benefit pension plans  in 2014.

Estimated future benefit payments are as follows (in thousands):

2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2019 - 2023 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 4,465
4,430
4,433
4,463
4,498
22,493

The Company’s cessation of its pineapple operations at  the end of 2009  and the  corresponding

reduction in the active participant count  for the Pension Plan for Bargaining Unit and Hourly
Employees (Bargaining Plan) triggered the requirement that the Company provide security  to  the
Pension Benefits Guaranty Corporation  (PBGC) of approximately $5.2 million to support the unfunded
liabilities of the Bargaining Plan. In April 2011,  the Company executed a  settlement agreement with the

41

PBGC and pledged security of approximately 1,400 acres in  West Maui that will be released in five
years if the Company does not otherwise  default on the agreement.

The Company was advised in October 2011 that the  cessation  of its  golf operations  and the
corresponding reduction in the active participant count for the Bargaining Plan and the Pension  Plan
for Non-Bargaining Unit Employees triggered the requirement  that the Company provide  additional
security to the PBGC of approximately $18.7 million to support the  unfunded liabilities  of  the two
pension plans or to make contributions to the plans in excess of the minimum required amounts. In
November 2012, the Company executed  a settlement  agreement with  the PBGC and pledged security of
approximately 7,000 acres in West Maui that will be released in five years if the Company does  not
otherwise default on the agreement.  No formal appraisal or determination of the fair  value of  the
7,000 acres was performed by the Company in connection  with the settlement agreement with  the
PBGC.

In June 2013, the State of Hawaii enacted a bill  directing the  Department  of Land and Natural
Resources (DLNR), in consultation with  the Hawaiian Islands Land Trust, to engage  in the purchase of
an approximately 270-acre parcel of former agricultural  land in  West  Maui, known as Lipoa Point, from
the Company. The bill further requires  the DLNR to ensure  to  the maximum extent  practicable  that
the Company uses the proceeds of the sale to benefit the Company’s defined benefit  pension plans. As
of December 31, 2013, the Company  had unfunded pension fund liabilities of  $20.9 million. The
unfunded obligations are secured by  approximately 8,400 acres  in West  Maui  with a carrying  value of
$1.8 million, which includes Lipoa Point.  The  passage of the bill  does not obligate  the DLNR  to
purchase the property or obligate the  Company  to  sell the property. Any  such sale would be subject  to
negotiation between the parties, including the  purchase  price. There is  no certainty that any such  sale
will take place, and even if it does, the amount by which the Company’s  unfunded pension fund
liabilities would be reduced is uncertain. Any such  reduction may not  be  sufficient to release the
security interest on any of the Company’s  other  West  Maui real estate holdings securing the Company’s
unfunded pension fund liabilities.

The Company has investment and savings  plans  that allow  eligible employees on a voluntary basis

to make pre-tax contributions of their  cash compensation. Substantially all employees are eligible to
participate in one or more plans. No  Company contributions were made to these plans in 2013  or 2012.

On October 1, 1998, deferred compensation plans that provided  for  specified payments  after
retirement for certain management employees were amended  to  eliminate  future benefits.  At the
termination date, these employees were given credit  for  existing years of service and the future vesting
of additional benefits was discontinued.  The present value  of  the benefits  to  be  paid was being accrued
over the period of active employment.  As of December 31, 2013  and 2012,  deferred compensation plan
liabilities totaled $340,000 and $512,000, respectively.

10. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company accounts for share-based compensation arrangements, including grants  of employee

stock options, as compensation expense  over the service period (generally the vesting period)  in the
consolidated financial statements based  on  their fair values. The impact of forfeitures that may  occur
prior to vesting is  also estimated and considered  in the amount recognized. Excess  tax benefits are
reported as a financing cash inflow rather than as a reduction of taxes  paid.

The total compensation expense recognized  for share-based compensation was $425,000 and

$489,000 for 2013 and 2012, respectively.  There was  no tax benefit or expense related thereto.
Recognized share-based compensation was reduced for estimated forfeitures prior to vesting based
primarily on historical annual forfeiture  rates of approximately 2.8% and 3.2%, for 2013  and 2012,
respectively. Estimated forfeitures will  be  reassessed in  subsequent periods  and may  change based on
new facts and circumstances. Executive officers and certain members of management  received  annual

42

incentive awards of $133,100 and $150,300 in  February 2013 and 2012, respectively, based on the
achievement of certain predefined performance goals and objectives. The annual incentive  awards are
paid in stock of the Company and resulted  in the issuance of  33,187 and 39,294 shares  in February
2013 and 2012, respectively.

Stock Options

In May 2006, the Company’s shareholders approved  the 2006 Equity and Incentive Award  Plan

(the ‘‘2006 Plan’’) and an increase in the  number of shares of common  stock  authorized under the
Articles of Association by 1,000,000 shares, all of which have been reserved for issuance under  the 2006
Plan. The 2006 Plan provides that the  administrator can grant stock  options and other equity
instruments. The terms of certain grant types follow general guidelines,  but the term and conditions of
each  award can vary at the discretion of the administrator.  With respect to  awards  granted to
non-employee directors, the administrator  of the 2006  Plan  is the Board  of Directors.  The
Compensation Committee of the Board  is  the administrator of the  2006 Plan for  all  other  persons,
unless the Board assumes authority for administration. At December 31,  2013, there were
447,824 shares remaining and available for issuance under the 2006 Plan.

A summary of stock option award activity as of and for the year  ended  December 31, 2013 is

presented below:

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value

Shares

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (years)

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
$(000)(1)

Outstanding at December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . .
Forfeited or Cancelled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

79,000
(19,000)

$23.52
$35.82

Outstanding at December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . .

60,000

$19.63

$12.29

$ 7.33

Exercisable at December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . .

55,000

$20.94

$ 7.77

Expected to Vest at December 31, 2013(2) . . . .

3,600

$ 5.20

$ 2.48

3.4

3.2

5.2

$—

$—

$—

(1) For in the money options

(2) Options expected to vest reflect  estimated  forfeitures.

There were no stock option awards granted in 2013 or 2012. The  grant date  fair value of stock

options vested in 2013 and 2012 was $12,000 and $35,000, respectively.

As of December 31, 2013, there was  $2,300 of total unrecognized compensation for  awards  granted

under the stock options plans that is  expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of
0.3 year.

Restricted Stock

In 2013, 12,000 restricted shares that vest as service  requirements  are  met  were granted  to
management employees and the Company’s Board  of Directors,  and  74,342 shares of  restricted stock
vested as directors’ and management service requirements  were met. In 2012,  21,277 restricted shares
that vest as service requirements are  met were  granted to management  employees and the Company’s
Board of Directors, and 78,769 shares  of restricted stock vested as directors’ and management  service
requirements were met. All restricted shares granted in 2013 and 2012  were granted under the 2006
Plan. The weighted average grant-date fair value of restricted stock  granted during 2013 and 2012  was
$4.03 and $3.54 per share, respectively.

43

A summary of the activity for nonvested restricted  stock awards  as of and for the year ended

December 31, 2013 is presented below:

Nonvested balance at December 31, 2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Shares

94,137
12,000
(74,342)

Nonvested balance at December 31, 2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

31,795

Weighted
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value

$5.56
$4.03
$4.79

$5.79

11. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company has a 51% ownership interest in  Bay Holdings, the owner and developer  of  The
Residences at Kapalua Bay. The other members of Bay Holdings,  through wholly owned affiliates, are
Marriott, which owns a 34% interest  in Bay Holdings, and ER  which owns the remaining 15% interest
in Bay Holdings. Stephen M. Case, who is a  director and a 64% shareholder of the Company as of
February 2014, is the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and indirect beneficial owner of
Revolution LLC, which is the indirect  majority  owner of ER,  and thus Mr. Case  has a beneficial
interest in Bay Holdings.

12. INCOME TAXES

GAAP prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for  the financial statement

recognition and measurement of a tax  position taken  or expected to be taken in a tax return. In 2013,
the tax liability for uncertain tax positions was reduced by $248,000  to  $0 because of  expiration of
statutes of limitations and the IRS settlement. As  of December 31, 2013 and 2012,  total accrued
interest for uncertain income tax positions was $296,000  and  $899,000, respectively.

The Company recognizes accrued interest related  to  unrecognized tax benefits as  interest  expense

and penalties in general and administrative expense  in its consolidated statement of operations and
such amounts are  included in income  taxes payable  on the  Company’s consolidated balance sheet. A
reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

Balance at beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Settlement adjustments for tax provisions  of  prior years . . . . . . . . . .
Expiration of statutes of limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2013

2012

(in thousands)
$ 626
$ 248
(290)
(220)
(88)
(28)

Balance at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ — $ 248

In 2013, the income tax benefit from the reversal of the tax liability discussed  above were included
in income from discontinued operations as they  relate to the  Company’s former agriculture operations
that were discontinued in 2009. The Company also  recorded a  $0.5 million reversal of accrued income
taxes payable and  interest resulting from  its settlement with the IRS.

44

Reconciliations between the total income tax benefit  and  the amount computed using the statutory

federal rate of 35% was as follows:

Federal income tax benefit at statutory rate Adjusted  for:

. . . . . .
Valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Permanent differences and other

2013

2012

(in thousands)
$(1,061) $(1,335)
1,274
61

1,034
27

Income tax benefit—continuing operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ — $ —

Deferred tax assets (liabilities) were  comprised of the  following  temporary differences as  of

December 31, 2013 and 2012:

2013

2012

(in thousands)

Net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards . . . . . . . . . . . .
Joint venture and other investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued retirement benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property net book value . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stock compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reserves and other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 46,205
294
7,458
2,825
1,522
150
671

$ 49,205
2,440
10,815
4,304
1,280
145
663

Total deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Valuation Allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

59,125
(59,125)

68,852
(66,467)

Deferred condemnation proceeds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total deferred tax liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—

—

(2,385)

(2,385)

Net deferred tax assets (liabilities) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

— $

—

Valuation allowances have been established to reduce  future tax  benefits not expected to be
realized. The change in the deferred  tax  asset related  to  accrued  retirement benefits and the valuation
allowance includes the pension adjustment included in accumulated  other comprehensive  income,  which
is not included in the current provision. The  Company had $101.9  million  in federal  net operating loss
carry  forwards  at  December  31,  2013,  that  expire  from  2028  through  2033.  Net  operating  loss  for  state
income tax purposes that expire from  2028 through 2033  totaled $117.5  million  at December 31, 2013.

In April 2013, the Company and the IRS arrived at a settlement which concluded the IRS
examination of the Company’s federal  income tax returns for 2003  through 2008.  Under terms of the
settlement, the Company agreed to pay $1.8 million to the IRS,  of  which $0.7  million was  paid in 2013.
The Company is currently in discussion with  the IRS regarding the  remaining  payment terms of the
settlement. As a result of the settlement, the Company  reversed $0.5  million it had previously accrued
in income taxes payable and accrued  interest in estimating its exposure for  this  matter. The reversal has
been reported in discontinued operations  in the accompanying  condensed  consolidated  financial
statements as it relates to the Company’s former agricultural operations. The Company is subject to
routine audits by taxing jurisdictions and  there are  currently no audits for  any tax periods in progress.
As of December 31, 2013, tax years prior  to  2010 are  no longer  subject to examination  for U.S. tax
purposes.

45

13. SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company’s presentation of its reportable  operating segments is consistent  with how the

Company’s chief operating decision maker determines the  allocation of resources. Reportable segments
are as follows:

(cid:127) Real Estate includes the development and sale of real  estate  inventory and  the operations of

Kapalua Realty Company, a general brokerage real  estate company located within the Kapalua
Resort.

(cid:127) Leasing primarily includes revenues and expenses from  real property leasing activities,  license

fees and royalties for the use of certain of the  Company’s trademarks and brand  names by third
parties, and the cost of maintaining the Company’s  real estate assets,  including conservation
activities.

(cid:127) Utilities primarily include the operations of Kapalua Water Company  and  Kapalua Waste

Treatment Company, the Company’s  water and  sewage transmission operations (regulated by the
Hawaii Public Utilities Commission) servicing the Kapalua Resort.  The  operating segment  also
includes the management of ditch, reservoir and well systems  that provide  non-potable  irrigation
water to West and Upcountry Maui areas.

(cid:127) Resort Amenities include a membership program that provides certain  benefits and privileges

within the Kapalua Resort for its members. In 2012,  the resort  amenities  segment also included
a full-service spa and a beach club. In 2013, the  Company ceased operating the spa and  beach
club in conjunction with the conclusion of The  Residences  at Kapalua  Bay foreclosure
proceeding and accounted for the spa and beach club operation  results as  discontinued
operations.

Condensed financial information for  each of the Company’s reportable  segments for 2013 and 2012

follows:

2013
Operating revenues(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating income (loss)(2) . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Loss from continuing operations . . . . . .
Depreciation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Capital expenditures(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Assets(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Real
Estate

Leasing

Utilities

Amenities Other(5)

Consolidated

Resort

$ 5,434
357

$ 4,862
(405)

$3,686
882

$1,217
326

$

13
(1,700)

$15,212
(540)
(2,491)

71
— $

$ (3,031)
$ 2,550
277
$53,753

3,831

—
270
10,026

1,992
—
32,398

426
7
6,113

61
—
1,385

46

2012
Operating revenues(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Operating income (loss)(2) . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Loss from continuing operations . . . . . . .
Depreciation expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Capital expenditures(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Assets(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Real
Estate

Leasing

Utilities

Amenities Other(5)

Consolidated

Resort

$2,545
(338)

$ 5,806
428

$3,541
624

$1,635
960

$

44
(2,926)

$13,571
(1,252)
(2,563)

—
109
6,736

2,240
22
37,421

461
54
6,437

1
—
1,752

176
— $

9,139

$ (3,815)
$ 2,878
185
$61,485

(1) Amounts are principally revenues  from external  customers and exclude equity in earnings of

affiliates and interest income. Intersegment revenues were insignificant.

(2) ‘‘Operating loss’’ is total operating revenues, less operating  costs and expenses (excluding interest

income, interest expense and income taxes).

(3) Primarily includes expenditures for property and deferred costs.

(4) ‘‘Segment assets’’ are located in  the United States.

(5) Consists primarily of miscellaneous transactions and unallocated general  and administrative,

pension and other post-retirement expenses and gain related to the Kapalua  Bay settlement. Other
assets are primarily assets held for sale,  assets related  to  discontinued operations, information
technology assets and assets at the Kapalua Resort  that  are not used directly in any  operating
segment.

14. RESERVES

Allowance for doubtful accounts and reserves for  environmental  liabilities  for 2013  and 2012 are as

follows:

Description

Balance at
Beginning of
Year

Increase

Decrease

Balance at
End of Year

(in thousands)

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$262
$519

$ 92
$212

$(191)
$(469)

$163
$262

Description

Reserve for Environmental Liabilities

Balance at
Beginning of
Year

Increase

Decrease

Balance at
End of Year

(in thousands)

2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$675
$866

$41
$—

$(551)
$(191)

$165
$675

In 2013, the Company recorded a decrease  of  the environmental reserve of  $551,000 in
conjunction with the sale of a 7-acre  parcel and building that was  part of  the Company’s  former
agricultural processing facilities in Central Maui because the buyer assumed responsibility.

47

15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Discontinued Operations

On April 19, 2011, a lawsuit was filed  against the  Company’s wholly owned subsidiary MPC  and
several other Hawaii based farms by  the  EEOC. The lawsuit alleges the farms should  be  held liable  for
illegal acts by Global Horizons, Inc.,  a company that had hired Thai  workers to work at  the farms. The
lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court, District of Hawaii,  as Civil Action No. 11-00257.
On June 13, 2013, the EEOC filed a  motion to add as defendants Maui Land & Pineapple
Company, Inc. and Hali’imaile Pineapple  Company, Ltd.  On September  10, 2013, the  Court denied  the
EEOC’s motion. MPC believes it was not involved in any wrongdoing, disagrees  with the charges and is
defending itself. Because this lawsuit is  in  its early stages and  has not gone to trial,  MPC is  presently
unable to estimate the amount, or range of amounts, of any probable liability, if any, related  to  this
matter and no provision has been made in  the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Pursuant to a 1999 settlement agreement with the County of Maui, the Company and  several
chemical manufacturers have agreed that  until December 1, 2039,  they will pay for 90% of  the capital
costs to install filtration systems in any future water wells if the presence  of  a nematocide, commonly
known as DBCP, exceeds specified levels,  and  for the  ongoing  maintenance and operating cost for
filtration systems on existing and future  wells.  The Company  estimated  its share  of the cost  to  operate
and maintain the filtration systems for the existing wells, and its  share of  the  cost of a letter of credit
used to secure its obligations, and as  of  December 31, 2013 has recorded a  reserve for environmental
liability of $82,000. The Company is presently  not  aware of any plans by the  County of Maui to install
other filtration systems or to drill any  water  wells in  areas affected by agricultural chemicals.
Accordingly, a reserve for costs relating  to any future  wells has  not  been recorded because the
Company is not able to reasonably estimate the amount of liability, if any.

Kapalua Bay

On May 23, 2011, a lawsuit was filed against multiple parties including the  Company by purchasers
of two units at the project formerly known as The  Ritz-Carlton Residences at Kapalua Bay. The lawsuit
was filed in the Circuit Court of the Second Circuit, State of Hawaii  pursuant to Civil
No. 11-1-0216-(3). The lawsuit alleges deceptive  acts, intentional  misrepresentation,  concealment,  and
negligent misrepresentation, among other allegations with  regard to the  sale of the  two residential units
and seeks unspecified damages, treble  damages and other relief. The Company disagrees with  the
allegations and plans to vigorously defend  itself. Because this lawsuit is in its early  stages and has not
gone to trial, the Company is presently  unable to estimate  the amount, or range of  amounts,  of any
probable liability, if any, related to this  matter  and  no provision has been  made in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements.

On June 7, 2012, a group of owners of  12 whole-ownership  units  at  the project  formerly known as

The Ritz-Carlton Club and Residences, Kapalua Bay filed a lawsuit  against multiple parties including
the Company. The Company believes it  has not been involved in any wrongdoing,  disagrees with the
charges and plans to vigorously defend  itself. Because this lawsuit is  in its  early stages and  has not gone
to trial, the Company is presently unable to estimate the  amount,  or range  of  amounts, of any  probable
liability, if any, related to this matter  and  no provision  has been made in  the accompanying
consolidated financial statements.

On June 19, 2013, a lawsuit was filed  against  multiple parties including the  Company by several

owners of timeshare condominium interests in the  project formerly known  as The Ritz-Carlton
Residences at Kapalua Bay (Fractional Interests). The  lawsuit was filed  in the Circuit Court of the
Second Circuit, State of Hawaii, pursuant  to  Civil No. 13-1-0640-(2). The lawsuit alleges unfair and
deceptive trade practices, negligent misrepresentations, omissions, concealment,  and fraud in the
inducement among other allegations  with regards to the marketing and sales of certain Fractional

48

Interests  and seeks unspecified damages,  treble damages and other  relief. The Company disagrees  with
the allegations and plans to vigorously  defend itself. Because this lawsuit  is in its early stages and has
not gone to trial, the Company is presently unable to estimate  the amount, or range  of  amounts, of any
probable liability, if any, related to this  matter  and  no provision has been  made in the accompanying
consolidated financial statements.

In addition to the matters noted above, there  are various  other claims and legal actions pending

against the Company. In the opinion  of management, after  consultation with legal counsel,  the
resolution of these other matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on  the Company’s
financial position or results of operations.

49

Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH  ACCOUNTANTS ON  ACCOUNTING AND

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures  (as  such term  is defined in
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the  Exchange Act) as of  December 31, 2013. We  maintain
disclosure controls and procedures that  are  designed to provide reasonable assurance that information
required to be disclosed in our reports  filed or submitted under  the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the  SEC’s rules and forms
and that such information is accumulated  and communicated to our management,  including our
principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate,  to allow for  timely decisions
regarding required disclosure. Our management recognizes  that any controls and procedures, no matter
how well designed and operated, can  provide only reasonable assurance  of achieving their objectives
and management necessarily applies  its judgment in evaluating the  cost-benefit relationship of possible
controls and procedures. Based on the evaluation of  our disclosure  controls and procedures as of
December 31, 2013, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer  concluded that, as of
such date, our disclosure controls and  procedures were effective.

MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON  INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Our management has the responsibility for  establishing and  maintaining adequate  internal control

over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting  is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, as a process designed  by, or under the  supervision of, the
Company’s principal executive and principal financial officer  and  effected  by  our board of directors,
management and other personnel to provide reasonable  assurance regarding  the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of financial  statements for external purposes  in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted  in  the United States of America. Our  internal controls  over
financial reporting include those policies  and  procedures that:

(cid:127) Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly  reflect the

transactions and dispositions of our assets;

(cid:127) Provide reasonable assurance that transactions  are recorded as  necessary to permit  preparation

of financial statements in accordance with accounting  principles generally  accepted in the  United
States of America, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of our management  and  directors;  and

(cid:127) Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention  or timely  detection of unauthorized

acquisition, use or  disposition of our assets  that could  have a material  effect  on the consolidated
financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over  financial  reporting only provides

reasonable assurance with respect to financial  statement presentation and preparation. Projections of
any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods  are subject to the  risks  that  controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the  degree  of compliance with  the policies or
procedures may deteriorate.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting

as of  December 31, 2013. In making  this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the

50

Committee of Sponsoring Organizations  of  the Treadway  Commission (COSO)  in Internal Control—
Integrated Framework (1992). Based on its assessments, management believes that, as of December 31,
2013, the Company’s internal control  over financial reporting  is effective.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS  OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal controls over  financial  reporting (as such

term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under  the Exchange  Act) during the  fiscal fourth  quarter  that  has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially  affect, the  Company’s internal controls over
financial reporting.

Item 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE  OFFICERS  AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The information set forth under ‘‘Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance’’  and
‘‘Election of Directors’’ in the Maui  Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. Proxy Statement, to be filed  no
later than 120 days after the close of  our  fiscal year ended December 31,  2013, is incorporated  herein
by reference. Certain information concerning our executive officers is  contained in  Item 1 of this
annual report.

Code of Ethics

Our Board of Directors approved the  Amended and Restated Code  of Ethics in March 2008. The

Code of Ethics is applicable to our Principal  Executive Officer, Principal Financial  Officer, Principal
Accounting Officer and all other employees of the Company.  The Code of Ethics  is intended to qualify
as a ‘‘code of ethics’’ for purposes of Item 406(b) of Regulation  S-K. The Code  of  Ethics is posted on
our  website at http://mauiland.com/investor.shtml. We will  satisfy  the disclosure requirement  under
Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding any  amendment to, or  waiver  from,  any  applicable provision (related
to elements listed under Item 406(b) of Regulation  S-K) of the Code of  Ethics by posting  such
information on our website.

Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information set forth under ‘‘Executive  Compensation,’’  and ‘‘Director Compensation’’ in  the

Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc.  Proxy  Statement, to be filed  no later than 120 days after the
close of our fiscal year ended December 31,  2013, is  incorporated  herein by reference.

Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP  OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS  AND MANAGEMENT

AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The information set forth under ‘‘Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners’’ in the Maui

Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. Proxy Statement, to be filed no  later than 120 days  after the close  of
our  fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, is incorporated herein by  reference, which  is set forth  below.

51

Securities Authorized For Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

The following table provides summary information as  of  December  31, 2013, for our equity

compensation plans:

Plan Category

Number of securities
to be issued
upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

(a)

Weighted-average
exercise price  of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity  compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))

Equity compensation plans approved by

security holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

91,795

19.63

447,824

With the exception of the information regarding  securities authorized for issuance under  our equity
compensation plans set forth above, the  information required  by this Item  12 is  incorporated herein by
reference to the Maui Land & Pineapple  Company, Inc. Proxy Statement, to be filed no later than
120 days after the close of our fiscal  year  ended December  31, 2013.

Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS  AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND  DIRECTOR

INDEPENDENCE

The information set forth under ‘‘Certain Relationship  and Related Transactions,’’ and ‘‘—Director

Independence’’ in  the Maui Land &  Pineapple Company,  Inc. Proxy Statement, to be filed no later
than 120 days after the close of our fiscal  year  ended December 31, 2013, is incorporated herein by
reference.

Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Information set forth under ‘‘Independent  Registered Public Accounting  Firm’’ in  the Maui

Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. Proxy Statement, to be filed no  later than 120 days  after the close  of
our  fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, is incorporated herein by  reference.

Item 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT  SCHEDULES

(a)1. Financial Statements

PART IV

The following Financial Statements of Maui Land  &  Pineapple Company, Inc. and subsidiaries and
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting  Firm are included in  Item 8 of this annual report:

Consolidated Statements of Operations  and  Comprehensive  Income (Loss) for the Years Ended

December 31, 2013 and 2012

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31,  2013 and 2012
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’  Deficiency for the Years  Ended  December 31,  2013 and

2012

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows  for  the Years Ended December 31, 2013 and 2012
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

52

(a)3. Exhibits

Exhibit No

3.1

3.2

10.1

10.2

10.3

10.4

10.5

10.6

10.7

10.8

Restated Articles of Association, as of May 13,  2010 (filed  as Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2010, filed August  4, 2010, and incorporated herein  by
reference).

Amended Bylaws, as of February 17,  2012. (filed as  Exhibit 3.2 to Form  10-K for  the year
ended December 31, 2011, filed March  2, 2012 and incorporated herein  by  reference).

Loan Agreement by and between  American  AgCredit,  FLCA  and Maui Land & Pineapple
Company, Inc., entered into as of December 22,  2010 (filed  as exhibit 10.23  to  Form 10-K
for  the  year  ended  December  31,  2010,  filed  March  14,  2011  and  incorporated  herein  by
reference).

Fee and Leasehold Mortgage with Absolute Assignment of Leases and Rents, Security
Agreement and Fixture Filing, entered into on  November 15, 2007  (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to
Form 8-K, filed November 19, 2007 and incorporated herein  by reference).

Amended and Restated Credit Agreement,  dated as of  October 9, 2009, by and among
Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc., and each of the financial  institutions  initially a
signatory thereto, and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as  Administrative Agent
(filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for  the  quarter ended September 30,  2009, filed
November 3, 2009 and incorporated  herein  by reference).

First Modification Agreement dated as of September  17, 2010, entered  into  by  and among
Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc., and each of the financial  institutions  initially a
signatory thereto (filed as Exhibit 10.4 to Form  10-Q for the  quarter  ended September 30,
2010, filed November 2, 2010 and incorporated herein by  reference).

Second Modification Agreement and Waiver dated as  of December 22, 2010, entered  into
by and among Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association (filed as exhibit 10.21 to Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31,  2010,
filed March 14, 2011 and incorporated  herein by reference).

Third Modification Agreement  and Waiver dated  as of February 23, 2011, entered  into  by
and among Maui Land & Pineapple  Company,  Inc.  and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association (filed as exhibit 10.22 to Form 10-K for the year ended  December 31,  2010,
filed March 14, 2011 and incorporated  herein by reference).

Fourth Modification Agreement dated  as of August 1, 2011, entered into by and  among
Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National  Association  (filed
as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended  September 30, 2011, filed November 3,
2011 and incorporated herein by reference).

Second Amendment Agreement dated  February 26, 2013, entered  into  by  and among Maui
Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. and American AgCredit, FLCA. (filed as  Exhibit  10.8 to
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012,  filed March 1, 2013 and incorporated
herein by reference).

10.9†

Supplemental Executive Retirement  Plan  (effective as of January 1, 1988) (filed as
Exhibit (10)B to Form 10-K for the year  ended December 31, 1988  (SEC File
No. 001-06510), and incorporated herein by  reference).

53

Exhibit No

10.10† Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. 2003 Stock and Incentive Compensation Plan

(incorporated by reference to Appendix  B of the Definitive Proxy  Statement  on
Schedule 14A filed on November 10,  2003 (SEC File No.  001-06510)).

10.11† Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. 2006 Equity and  Incentive Award Plan
(incorporated by reference to Appendix  B of the Definitive Proxy  Statement  on
Schedule 14A filed on March 27, 2006 (SEC File No. 001-06510)).

10.12† Form of Stock Option Grant Notice and Form of  Stock Option  Agreement, pursuant to
the Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. 2006 Equity and  Incentive Award Plan (filed
as Exhibit 10.9 to Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended  June 30, 2006,  filed August 8, 2006
(SEC File No. 001-06510), and incorporated  herein by reference).

10.13† Form of Restricted Stock Award Grant Notice and Form of Restricted  Stock Award
Agreement, pursuant to the Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. 2006 Equity and
Incentive Award Plan (filed as Exhibit 10.10 to Form 10-Q for  the quarter ended June 30,
2006, filed August 8, 2006 (SEC File No.  001-06510), and incorporated herein  by
reference).

10.14

10.15

10.16

10.17

10.18

Limited Liability Company Agreement  of  Kapalua Bay  Holdings, LLC,  dated August 31,
2004 (filed as Exhibit 10(A) to Form  10-Q  for the quarter  ended September 30, 2004, filed
November 12, 2004 (SEC File No. 001-06510), and incorporated herein  by  reference).

Fee and Leasehold Mortgage, Security Agreement and Fixture Filing made by Kapalua
Bay, LLC in favor of Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K
filed July 20, 2006 (SEC File No. 001-06510)  and incorporated  herein  by reference).

Completion Guaranty made by  Maui  Land &  Pineapple Company, Inc., The Ritz-Carlton
Development Company, Inc. and Exclusive  Resorts Development Company,  LLC in  favor
of Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. (filed as  Exhibit 10.4  to Form 8-K filed July  20, 2006
(SEC File No. 001-06510) and incorporated  herein by reference).

Recourse Guaranty made by Maui Land &  Pineapple Company,  Inc., The Ritz-Carlton
Development Company, Inc. and Exclusive  Resorts Development Company,  LLC in  favor
of Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. (filed as  Exhibit 10.5  to Form 8-K filed July  20, 2006
(SEC File No. 001-06510) and incorporated  herein by reference).

Amended and Restated Construction  Loan  Agreement, dated as  of  February  11, 2009, by
and among Kapalua Bay, LLC, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., Central  Pacific Bank,
Landesbank Baden-W¨urttemberg, Deutsche Hypothekenbank,  Swedbank AB,  New  York
Branch, and MH Kapalua Venture, LLC (filed as Exhibit  10.55 to Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2008, filed March 31, 2009 and incorporated herein  by  reference).

10.19 Master Assignment and Assumption  and Modification Agreement, dated as of  February 11,

2009, by and among Kapalua Bay, LLC,  Lehman Brothers  Holdings Inc.,  Central Pacific
Bank, Landesbank Baden-W¨urttemberg, Deutsche Hypothekenbank, Swedbank AB, New
York Branch, and MH Kapalua Venture, LLC (filed as Exhibit  10.56 to Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2008, filed  March 31, 2009 and incorporated herein by
reference).

54

Exhibit No

10.20

Second Omnibus Amendment to Construction Loan Documents,  dated  as of February 11,
2009, by and among Kapalua Bay, LLC,  Lehman Brothers  Holdings  Inc.,  Central Pacific
Bank, Landesbank Baden-W¨urttemberg, Deutsche Hypothekenbank, Swedbank AB,  New
York Branch, and  MH Kapalua Venture, LLC  (filed as  Exhibit  10.57 to Form  10-K for  the
year ended December 31, 2008, filed March  31, 2009 and incorporated herein  by
reference).

10.21(cid:1) Sale, Purchase and Lease Termination Agreement, entered into on March 28,  2007 (filed

as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended March  31, 2007, filed May 9, 2007  and
incorporated herein by reference).

10.22(cid:1) Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company  Agreement of W2005  Kapalua/

Gengate Hotel Holdings L.L.C., entered  into  on March  28, 2007 (filed  as Exhibit 10.2  to
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,  2007, filed  May 9,  2007 and incorporated
herein by reference).

10.23

Settlement Agreement entered into on April 19,  2011, by and between Maui  Land &
Pineapple Company, Inc. and the Pension  Benefit  Guaranty Corporation. (filed as
Exhibit 10.22 to Form 10-K for the year ended  December  31, 2011, filed  March 2, 2012
and incorporated herein by reference).

10.24 Mortgage, Security Agreement, Assignment of Rents,  Fixture Filing and  Financing

Statement effective April 19, 2011. (filed as Exhibit 10.23  to  Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2011, filed March 2, 2012 and incorporated herein by  reference).

10.25*

10.26

10.27

10.28

Settlement and Release Agreement  entered into on  October 24, 2013, by and between
Kapalua Bay, LLC, The Ritz-Carlton Management Company, L.L.C.,  The  Ritz-Carlton
Development Company, Inc., MH Kapalua Venture, LLC,  Maui  Land &  Pineapple
Company, Inc., Exclusive Resorts, Inc.,  Maui  Holdings JV LLC, Lantern Asset
Management, LLC, Island Investors, LLC, Island Acquisitions Kapalua,  LLC and Lehman
Brothers Holdings, Inc.

Settlement Agreement entered into on November  19, 2012, by and between Maui Land &
Pineapple Company, Inc. and the Pension  Benefit  Guaranty Corporation (filed as
Exhibit 10.25 to Form 10-K for the year ended  December  31, 2012, filed  March 1, 2013
and incorporated herein by reference).

Kapalua Bay Course Sale, Purchase  and  Escrow Agreement  dated September 16,  2010
(filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q for the  quarter  ended September 30,  2010, filed
November 2, 2010 and incorporated  herein by reference).

Bay Golf Course Lease made and entered into effective September 30, 2010  (filed as
Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended September 30, 2010, filed November 2,
2010 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.29 Golf Academy Lease, made and entered into effective  October 1,  2010 (filed as

Exhibit 10.3 to Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended September 30, 2010, filed November 2,
2010 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.30

Settlement Agreement and Release of All Claims (Board  of Water Supply  of the County  of
Maui vs.  Shell Oil Company, et al.) (filed as Exhibit 10.5(i) to Form 10-K  for the  year
ended December 31, 1999 (SEC File No. 001-06510), filed  March 24, 2000 and
incorporated herein by reference).

21.*

Subsidiaries of Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc.

55

Exhibit No

23.1* Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP, Independent Registered  Public Accounting Firm, dated

March  20,  2014.

31.1* Certification of Chief Executive  Officer Pursuant to Rule  13a-14(a) / 15d-14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

31.2* Certification of Chief Financial  Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) /  15d-14(a) of  the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

32.1** Certification of Chief Executive  Officer Pursuant to 18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted

pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of  2002.

32.2** Certification of Chief Financial  Officer Pursuant to 18  U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted

pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act  of  2002.

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension  Schema Document

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation document

101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension labels  Linkbase  Document

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Link Document

*

This document is being ‘‘filed’’ herewith.

** This certification shall not be deemed  to  be  ‘‘filed’’ for the purposes  of Section 18  of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise  subject to the liability of  that  section,  nor shall it
be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, or the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934, as  amended, except to  the extent  that  the
registrant specifically incorporates it  by reference.

†

This document represents a management contract  or compensatory plan or arrangement required
to be filed as an exhibit to this Annual  Report on  Form 10-K pursuant  to  Item 15(c) of
Form 10-K.

(cid:1) Portions  of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant  to  a request for confidential  treatment under
Rule 24-b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.  The omitted  material  has been
separately filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

56

Pursuant to the requirements of Section  13  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as

amended, the Registrant has duly caused  this  report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto  duly  authorized,  on  March  20,  2014

SIGNATURES

MAUI LAND & PINEAPPLE COMPANY, INC.

By:

/s/ WARREN H. HARUKI

Warren H. Haruki
Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934, this report has  been signed

below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and  in the  capacities and  on the  dates
indicated.

By /s/ WARREN H.  HARUKI

Date  March  20,  2014

Warren H. Haruki, Chairman of the Board &
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive
Officer)

By /s/ STEPHEN M.  CASE

Date  March  20,  2014

Stephen M. Case, Director

By /s/ DAVID A. HEENAN

Date  March  20,  2014

David A. Heenan, Director

By /s/ DUNCAN MACNAUGHTON

Date  March  20,  2014

Duncan  MacNaughton, Director

By /s/ ARTHUR C. TOKIN

Arthur C. Tokin, Director

Date  March  20,  2014

By /s/ TIM T. ESAKI

Date  March  20,  2014

Tim T. Esaki, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

By /s/ PAULUS SUBRATA

Date  March  20,  2014

Paulus Subrata, Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)

57

SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT

THIS SETTLEMENT AND RELEASE AGREEMENT (this “Agreement”) is made and entered into effective as
of October 24, 2013 (the “Effective Date”), by and between Kapalua Bay, LLC (“KBLLC”), The Ritz-Carlton Management
Company, L.L.C. (“RCMC”), The Ritz-Carlton Development Company, Inc. (“RCDC”), MH Kapalua Venture, LLC
(“MHKV”), Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc. (“MLP”), Exclusive Resorts, Inc. (“ER”) (KBLLC, RCMC, RCDC,
MHKV, MLP, and ER are collectively referred to herein as “Original Project Parties”), Maui Holdings JV LLC (“Maui
JV”), Lantern Asset Management, LLC (“Lantern”), Island Investors, LLC (“Island”), Island Acquisitions Kapalua, LLC
(“IAK”), and Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. (“Lehman”), (Maui JV, Lantern, Island, IAK, and Lehman are collectively
referred to herein as “New Project Parties”). The above-listed entities are individually referred to as a “Party” and
collectively as the “Parties.”

Exhibit 10.25

RECITALS

WHEREAS, the Parties wish to resolve numerous disputes and issues related to the Amended and Restated
Construction Loan Agreement dated as of February 11, 2009 (as amended, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to
time, the “Loan Agreement”) and the Loan Documents (as defined in the Loan Agreement) and the Project which the Loan
Documents define and concern, including issues and disputes concerning (i) the loan made to KBLLC pursuant to the Loan
Agreement; (ii) the physical condition of the Project; and (iii) the operation of the Project;

WHEREAS, the Parties believe that it would be in their mutual best interests to avoid the costs and uncertainties of

litigation regarding the above-stated disputes and issues and to finally settle such disputes and issues on the terms and
conditions set forth herein; and

WHEREAS, this Agreement is being entered into contemporaneously with settlement agreements involving certain
other entities associated with the Project (collectively, the “Related Settlements”), including (i) RCMC and the Kapalua Bay
Vacation Owners Association, Inc. (“VOA”), (ii) RCMC and the Association of Apartment Owners of Kapalua Bay
Condominium (“AOAO”), (iii) the AOAO, the VOA and IAK, and (iv) IAK and MLP.

AGREEMENT

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals, which are incorporated herein by reference, the

promises and mutual covenants contained herein and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of
which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows:

1.                                      Definitions.

1.1                   Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such

terms in the Loan Agreement.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1.2                   “Escrow Agent” means the Hawaii office of Old Republic Title & Escrow of Hawaii whose mailing

address is: 4211 Waialae Avenue, #8040, Honolulu, Hawai’i 96816.

1.3                   “AOAO Settlement Agreement” means the Settlement and Release Agreement between the AOAO and

RCMC dated October 24, 2013 and attached hereto as Exhibit “B”.

1.4                   “VOA Settlement Agreement” means the Settlement and Release Agreement between the VOA and

RCMC dated October 24, 2013 and attached hereto as Exhibit “C”.

1.5                   “VOA Minimum Release Condition” means the condition precedent set forth in the VOA Settlement
Agreement that the Escrow Agent receive Release Agreements (as defined therein) from Fractional Interest Owners (as
defined therein) representing seventy (70) or more Fractional Interests (as defined therein) within the Escrow Period (as
defined therein).

1.6                   “Affiliates” means, with respect to any Party, all parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, sister
companies, and agents of, and all other companies and entities under common ownership or control with, such Party, as
well as the respective current and past officers, directors, shareholders, owners, members, employees, consultants,
representatives, agents, attorneys, successors and assigns of all of the foregoing, including, for the avoidance of doubt, each
person or entity listed on Exhibit “A” hereto.

1.7                   “Court” means the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York.

1.8                   “Lehman Bankruptcy Case” means the case styled In re Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc., et al., Case

No. 08-13555 (JMP), pending before the Court.

1.9                   “Release Effective Date” means such date, if any, upon which the conditions stated in Section 3.2(i) have

been satisfied.

1.10            “Settlement Documents” means this Agreement, together with all exhibits hereto.

1.11            “Terminated Notes” means the original Promissory Notes executed by KBLLC in connection with the

Loan Agreement, each of which shall be marked “Cancelled/Satisfied” in accordance with Section 10 of this Agreement.

2.                                      Escrow.

Within five (5) days of the Effective Date, the Parties shall establish an escrow account with the Escrow Agent.

3.                                      Deposit of Settlement Documents and Terminated Notes with Escrow Agent and Release From Escrow.

3.1.                            Simultaneously with the Parties establishing an escrow account with the Escrow Agent, (i) the Parties shall

execute and deposit with Escrow Agent executed counterparts of the Settlement Documents, (ii) MLP, RCMC and ER shall
deposit their respective portions of the

2

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Deferred Maintenance Payment (defined below) with Escrow Agent in accordance with Section 4 below; and (iii) Lantern
shall deposit with Escrow Agent the Terminated Notes in accordance with Section 10 below together with the instructions
described in Section 10 below.

3.2.                            Escrow Agent shall hold the executed counterparts of the Settlement Documents, the Deferred Maintenance
Payment and the Terminated Notes in escrow, subject to Sections 3.3 and 3.4 below and in accordance with the terms of that
certain escrow direction letter of even date herewith executed by the Parties, the parties to the Related Settlements and
Escrow Agent (the “Escrow Direction Letter”), until the earlier of the date on which:

(i)                                     the VOA Minimum Release Condition has been satisfied (or waived by RCMC in accordance with

the VOA Settlement Agreement), or

(ii)                                  the Escrow Period (as defined in the VOA Settlement Agreement) has expired.

3.3.                            Upon the satisfaction of the conditions stated in Section 3.2(i) above prior to the expiration of the Escrow

Period, the Escrow Agent shall deliver in accordance with the Escrow Direction Letter (i) fully-executed originals of the
Settlement Documents to all Parties thereto, (ii) the Deferred Maintenance Payment to the AOAO, and (iii) the Terminated
Notes to KBLLC.

3.4.                            If the conditions stated in Section 3.2(i) fail to occur prior to the expiration of the Escrow Period, the

Escrow Agent shall return in accordance with the Escrow Direction Letter the Terminated Notes, Deferred Maintenance
Payment and original counterparts of the Settlement Documents to the Parties delivering the same, and this Agreement shall
be null and void and the Release Effective Date shall not occur.

3.5                               Each of the Parties hereby covenants and agrees that during the pendency of the Escrow Period, neither it

nor any of its Affiliates will pursue or cooperate in any other person’s pursuit of any claims, causes of action, demands or
suits of any kind, whether in law or equity, against any other Party or such other Party’s Affiliates that is not pending as of the
Effective Date; provided, however, that nothing in this Section 3.5 shall prohibit any of the Parties or their Affiliates from
defending or cooperating in the defense of any such claims, causes of action, demands or suits.

4.                                      Funding of Deferred Maintenance at Project.   Simultaneously with establishing an escrow account with Escrow
Agent, MLP, RCMC and ER shall deposit with the Escrow Agent their respective portions of a $3,855,000 payment (the
“Deferred Maintenance Payment”) to be used by the AOAO for deferred maintenance at the Project as set forth below:

4.1                               MLP shall deliver to the Escrow Agent Two Million Four Hundred Thousand Dollars ($2,400,000);

4.2                               ER shall deliver to the Escrow Agent Nine Hundred Thousand Dollars ($900,000); and

3

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
4.3                               RCMC shall deliver to the Escrow Agent Five Hundred Fifty-Five Thousand Dollars ($555,000).

5.                                      MLP/IAK Settlement.   To facilitate a settlement of matters surrounding the Project, MLP and the New Project
Parties have agreed to the settlement terms attached hereto as Exhibit “D” (“MLP/IAK Settlement”).  The definitive
documents memorializing the MLP/IAK Settlement shall be delivered to the Escrow Agent simultaneously with the execution
of this Agreement and shall be subject to the Escrow Direction Letter.

6.                                      Cooperation on Litigation Matters.   The Parties shall make all reasonable efforts to cooperate in the resolution of
any litigation surrounding the Project, which currently includes the following:

a.                                      Lawsuit styled, Earl C. Charles and Patricia A. Charles in their individual capacities and as co-trustees of

the Earl C. Charles and Patricia A. Charles Revocable Living Trust dated December 12, 1990, et al. v.
Kapalua Bay, LLC, et al., pending in the Circuit Court of the Second Circuit for the State of Hawaii, Case
Number 13-1-0640(2);

b.                                      Lawsuit styled, Virendra Nath, et al. v. Kapalua Bay LLC, et al., pending in the Circuit Court of the Second

Circuit for the State of Hawaii, Case Number 11-1-0216(3);

c.                                       Lawsuit styled, Krishna Narayan, et al. v. Marriott International, Inc., et al., pending in the Circuit Court of

the Second Circuit for the State of Hawaii, Case Number 12-1-0586(3);

d.                                      Lawsuit styled, Michael Jacob Rosenbaum v. Kapalua Bay LLC, et al., pending in the Circuit Court of the

Second Circuit for the State of Hawaii, Case Number 10-1-0435(1);

e.                                       Lawsuit styled, Michael Afremov and Lorie Afremov v. Kapalua Bay LLC, et al., pending in the Circuit

Court of the Second Circuit for the State of Hawaii, Case Number 09-1-0979(1); and

f.                                        Complaint in intervention filed by Plaintiff-Intervenors Michael Afremov and Lorie Afremov in the

Lawsuit styled, Lantern Asset Management, LLC, in its capacity as agent for Island Investors LLC, Lehman
Brothers Holdings Inc. and MH Kapalua Venture, LLC v. Kapalua Bay, LLC, et al., pending in the Circuit
Court of the First Circuit for the State of Hawaii, Case Number 12-1-1649-06.

7.                                      Consent to Insurance Refund.   All Parties hereto consent to RCMC funding, or causing to be funded (concurrently
with the Escrow Agent’s delivery of the Deferred Maintenance Payment to the AOAO), Four Hundred Seventy-Five
Thousand One Hundred Twenty-Seven and 28/100 Dollars ($475,127.28) to the AOAO (the “Insurance Refund”).  The
Insurance Refund represents that portion of the insurance premium paid by the AOAO in 2012 that is currently refundable to
the AOAO due to early termination of the coverage. All Parties hereto hereby waive and release any claims and causes of
action they may have with regard to the Insurance Refund.

4

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
8.                                      Court Approval.  Lehman represents that no approval of the Court in the Lehman Bankruptcy Case will be required
for Lehman to enter into this Agreement or take all actions reasonably necessary to execute upon the terms of this Agreement
and the Related Settlements to which Lehman is a party.

9.                                      Mutual Releases.

9.1.                            Effective upon the Release Effective Date, each of the Original Project Parties, for itself and on behalf of its
respective Affiliates, hereby forever remises, releases, acquits, satisfies, and forever discharges the New Project Parties and
their respective Affiliates (collectively, the “New Project Party Released Parties”), and shall be deemed to have remised,
released, acquitted, satisfied, and forever discharged the New Project Party Released Parties of and from all manner of
actions, causes of action, suits, debts, covenants, contracts, controversies, agreements, promises, claims, counterclaims and
demands whatsoever, which the Original Project Parties and their Affiliates ever had or now have against the New Project
Party Released Parties, or which any trustee, personal representative, successor, heir or assign of the Original Project Parties
and their Affiliates hereafter can, shall or may have, by reason of any matter, cause or thing whatsoever, whether asserted or
unasserted, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, contingent or non-contingent, liquidated or unliquidated, from the
beginning of time to the Effective Date, in each case that arise from or out of the Project, the loan made to KBLLC pursuant
to the Loan Agreement, or the Loan Documents, including, but not limited to, the Completion Guaranty, Recourse Guaranty,
Make Whole Letter, and Environmental Indemnity, as each are defined in the Loan Agreement (collectively, “Original
Project Party Released Claims”); and agree not to file or cause to be filed any legal action against any New Project Party
Released Party relating to or arising from Original Project Party Released Claims.  Further, this paragraph shall not operate or
be construed to operate as a release or discharge of any of the New Project Party Released Parties’ obligations under this
Agreement or any of the Related Settlements, and does not contemplate any third-party beneficiaries except the New Project
Party Released Parties.

9.2.                            Effective upon the Release Effective Date, each of the New Project Parties, for itself and on behalf of its respective
Affiliates, hereby forever remises, releases, acquits, satisfies, and forever discharges the Original Project Parties and their
respective Affiliates (collectively, the “Original Project Party Released Parties”), and shall be deemed to have remised,
released, acquitted, satisfied, and forever discharged the Original Project Party Released Parties of and from all manner of
actions, causes of action, suits, debts, covenants, contracts, controversies, agreements, promises, claims, counterclaims and
demands whatsoever, which the New Project Parties and their Affiliates ever had or now have against the Original Project
Party Released Parties, or which any trustee, personal representative, successor, heir or assign of the New Project Parties and
their Affiliates hereafter can, shall or may have, by reason of any matter, cause or thing whatsoever, whether asserted or
unasserted, known or unknown, suspected or unsuspected, contingent or non-contingent,

5

 
 
 
 
 
liquidated or unliquidated, from the beginning of time to the Effective Date, in each case that arise from or out of the Project,
the loan made to KBLLC pursuant to the Loan Agreement, or the Loan Documents, including, but not limited to, the
Completion Guaranty, Recourse Guaranty, Make Whole Letter, and Environmental Indemnity, as each are defined in the
Loan Agreement (collectively, “New Project Party Released Claims”; and together with Original Project Party Released
Claims, “Claims”); and agree not to file or cause to be filed any legal action against any Original Project Party Released
Party relating to or arising from New Project Party Released Claims.  Further, this paragraph shall not operate or be construed
to operate as a release or discharge of any of the Original Project Party Released Parties’ obligations under this Agreement or
any of the Related Settlements, and does not contemplate any third-party beneficiaries except the Original Project Party
Released Parties.

9.3                               WITH RESPECT TO ANY AND ALL CLAIMS, THE PARTIES AGREE THAT THEY EXPRESSLY WAIVE
THE PROVISIONS, RIGHTS AND BENEFITS OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL CODE § 1542 AND ANY PROVISIONS,
RIGHTS AND BENEFITS CONFERRED BY ANY LAW OF ANY STATE OR TERRITORY OF THE UNITED STATES
OR PRINCIPLE OF COMMON LAW WHICH IS SIMILAR, COMPARABLE OR EQUIVALENT TO CALIFORNIA
CIVIL CODE § 1542, WHICH PROVIDES:

A GENERAL RELEASE DOES NOT EXTEND TO CLAIMS WHICH THE
CREDITOR DOES NOT KNOW OR SUSPECT TO EXIST IN HIS OR HER
FAVOR AT THE TIME OF EXECUTING THE RELEASE, WHICH IF
KNOWN BY HIM OR HER MUST HAVE MATERIALLY AFFECTED HIS
OR HER SETTLEMENT WITH THE DEBTOR.

THE PARTIES ACKNOWLEDGE THAT THEY MAY HEREAFTER DISCOVER FACTS IN ADDITION TO OR
DIFFERENT FROM THOSE THAT THEY NOW KNOW OR BELIEVE TO BE TRUE WITH RESPECT TO THE
SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CLAIMS, BUT THE PARTIES SHALL EXPRESSLY HAVE FULLY, FINALLY AND
FOREVER SETTLED, RELEASED AND DISCHARGED ANY AND ALL CLAIMS, KNOWN OR UNKNOWN,
SUSPECTED OR UNSUSPECTED, CONTINGENT OR NON-CONTINGENT, WHETHER OR NOT CONCEALED OR
HIDDEN, WHICH NOW EXIST, OR HERETOFORE HAVE EXISTED UPON ANY THEORY OF LAW OR EQUITY
NOW EXISTING OR COMING INTO EXISTENCE IN THE FUTURE, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
CONDUCT WHICH IS NEGLIGENT, RECKLESS, INTENTIONAL, WITH OR WITHOUT MALICE, OR A BREACH
OF ANY DUTY, LAW OR RULE, WITHOUT REGARD TO THE SUBSEQUENT DISCOVERY OR EXISTENCE OF
SUCH DIFFERENT OR ADDITIONAL FACTS.

10.                               Termination of Loan Documents; Return of Original Promissory Notes.   On the Effective Date, Lantern shall
instruct the Escrow Agent that, upon the occurrence of the Release Effective Date, Escrow Agent shall immediately: (i) mark
the face of all Terminated Notes as “Cancelled/Satisfied”, and (ii) deliver such Terminated Notes to KBLLC.  Upon the
Release Effective Date, the Loan Agreement and each of the Loan Documents, including, but not limited to, the Completion
Guaranty, Recourse Guaranty, Make Whole Letter, and Environmental

6

 
 
 
 
 
 
Indemnity (as each are defined in the Loan Agreement), and any and all further rights, obligations and liabilities of the Parties
thereunder, shall immediately terminate and be of no further force and effect.

11.                               No Admissions. This Agreement is the result of a settlement and compromise of disputed matters as set forth herein.
Nothing contained herein nor the consummation of this Agreement is to be construed or deemed an admission of liability,
culpability, negligence or wrongdoing on the part of the Parties hereto.  No Party hereto admits that the claims of the others
are valid or more meritorious and each Party hereto agrees that the terms of this Agreement shall never be used, referred to or
considered as an admission of liability of such claims.  The Parties hereto have entered into this Agreement with the intention
to avoid protracted disputes, uncertainties, and litigation with their attendant inconveniences and expenses.

12.                               Independent Counsel; Voluntary Agreement. The Parties hereto each acknowledge they have: (i) been given the
opportunity to consult with legal counsel and advisors of their own choosing in connection with the execution of this
Agreement and have each taken advantage of such opportunity, (ii) carefully read and considered all terms and provisions of
this Agreement and understand the substance and effect thereof, and (iii) entered into this Agreement freely and voluntarily
and without any coercion or duress, economic or otherwise.

13.                               Agreement; Amendment.  This Agreement is a final and binding settlement of the matters described herein and
supersedes any prior agreement or understanding, oral or written, pertaining to any matters described herein. No provision of
this Agreement may be modified, waived, amended or added to, except by a writing signed by the Party or Parties against
which the enforcement of such modification, waiver, amendment or addition is or may be sought. This Agreement is an
integrated agreement except to the extent indicated to the contrary in this Agreement.

14.                               Attorneys’ Fees; Costs.  Each Party to this Agreement shall bear its own fees and costs (including, without
limitation, attorneys’ fees) in connection with the settlement of the matters herein and the negotiation, execution and
performance of this Agreement.

15.                               Right to Enforce. Each Party to this Agreement has the right to enforce the terms of this Agreement and the
prevailing party in any such action is entitled to recover its reasonable and documented attorneys’ fees and costs.

16.                               Incorporation of Recitals, Exhibits. All recitals, exhibits and schedules attached hereto or referred to herein are
incorporated in this Agreement as though fully set forth herein.

17.                               Assignment; Successors and Assigns. This Agreement may not be assigned by any Party without the prior written
consent of the other Parties. No such assignment shall be deemed to relieve the assigning Party from any liability or
responsibility hereunder. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of each of the Parties hereto and
their respective successors and permitted assigns.

7

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
18.                               Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed and enforced pursuant to the laws of the state of New York.

19.                               Arbitration. Any controversy or claim arising out of or relating to this Agreement, or the breach thereof, shall be
settled by binding arbitration administered by the American Arbitration Association under its Commercial Arbitration Rules.
The arbitration will be heard and determined by a single arbitrator in New York, New York. The arbitrator’s decision in any
such arbitration will be final and binding upon the Parties and may be enforced in any court of competent jurisdiction.
Without limiting the foregoing, the Parties agree that any such decision may be enforced in, and accordingly submitted to the
nonexclusive jurisdiction and venue of, any court of competent jurisdiction.

20.                               Headings.  The headings of this Agreement are for purposes of reference only and shall not limit or define the
meaning of the provisions of this Agreement.

21.                               Waiver.  The waiver of any breach of any provision hereunder by any Party shall not be deemed to be a waiver of
any preceding or subsequent breach hereunder. No failure or delay of any Party in the exercise of any right given hereunder
shall constitute a waiver thereof nor shall any partial exercise of any right preclude further exercise thereof.

22.                               Time of Essence.  Time is of the essence in this Agreement as to all dates and time periods set forth herein.

23.                               Construction.                    Each Party to this Agreement acknowledges: (i) this Agreement and its reduction in final written
form is the result of extensive good faith negotiations, (ii) the Parties and their respective representatives have carefully
reviewed and examined this Agreement prior to execution by such Parties, (iii) any statutory rule of construction that
ambiguities are to be construed against the drafting party shall not be employed in the interpretation of this Agreement. The
terms and conditions of this Agreement have been negotiated at arm’s length among knowledgeable Parties, represented by
experienced legal counsel. As a result, the rule of “interpretation against the draftsman” shall not apply in any dispute over
the interpretation of the terms and conditions of this Agreement.

24.                               Authority to Execute Agreement. Each of the undersigned represents and warrants that he/she is duly authorized to
bind the entity for which he/she is executing this Agreement and that the Party for whom such person is signing is the sole
owner of any Claims it is releasing hereunder and has not assigned any such Claims.  The New Project Parties represent and
warrant that they have collectively acquired and continue to own all of the Lenders’ interests under the Loan Agreement and
other Loan Documents (except for the interest of MH Kapalua Venture, LLC), including, but not limited to, any claims of any
nature by such Lenders against the Original Project Parties, and that they are duly authorized under the Loan Agreement and
the other Loan Documents to enter into this Agreement.  Each Party separately acknowledges that the foregoing
representations and warranties are an essential and material provision of this Agreement and shall survive execution of this
Agreement.

8

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
25.                               No Third Party Beneficiaries.  Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, nothing contained in this
Agreement, express or implied, is intended to confer on any third party any right or remedies hereunder, and no individual or
entity not (i) a Party to this Agreement or (ii) an Affiliate shall be deemed to be a third party beneficiary of this Agreement.

26.                               Confidentiality. The Parties shall keep the terms and conditions of this Agreement confidential and shall not
convey, disclose, communicate, inform and/or otherwise disseminate, orally or in writing, to any third party the terms and
conditions of this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other Parties except: (i) made pursuant to court order or
as required by law; (ii) made to a respective attorney, lender, insurance carrier, auditor, representative, director or employee
of one of the Parties, provided that any such disclosure is made in the furtherance of a respective financial or business interest
of such Party and is not part of a general publication or dissemination; (iii) by a Party to enforce the terms of this Agreement;
or (iv) made to the parties of the Related Settlements, including the members of the VOA and the AOAO.  Notwithstanding
the foregoing, the ultimate parent company of any Party may make such disclosures in one or more filings with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) or the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) as are required to comply
with applicable SEC or NYSE rules and regulations.  The Parties shall not issue any press release, media disclosure, flier,
mailer, or other publication of any kind whatsoever intended for circulation among the general public (including, without
limitation, other owners in the Project) with respect to any of the terms and conditions of this Agreement without the express
written consent of the other Parties.  Lehman agrees that if Lehman is required to file this Agreement with the Court, it will
seek to do so under seal on the basis of this Section 26.

27.                               Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an
original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument.  A transmission by one Party to another Party
of an executed signature page of this Agreement by facsimile or in a pdf format by e-mail shall be deemed to constitute due
execution and delivery of this Agreement by such Party. The Parties intend to be bound by the signatures on such facsimile
and/or pdf document, are aware that the other Parties will rely on such signatures, and hereby waive any defenses to the
enforcement of the terms of this Agreement based on the form of signature.

28.                               Illegality.  If any clause, provision, or paragraph of this Agreement shall, for any reason, be held illegal, invalid, or
unenforceable, such illegality, invalidity, or enforceability shall not affect any other clause, provision, or paragraph of this
Agreement, and this Agreement shall be construed and enforced as if such illegal, invalid, or unenforceable clause, paragraph,
or other provision had not been contained herein, except if the release granted by any Party in this Agreement is deemed to be
unenforceable, illegal, or invalid, then the release granted by such releasing Party herein shall be of no force and effect, and
any monies or other consideration that may have been delivered to such releasing Party pursuant to this Agreement shall
immediately be returned to the Party that provided such monies or other consideration.

29.                               Survival.  Each term, representation and warranty contained in this Agreement and the exhibits hereto shall survive
execution of this Agreement.

9

 
 
 
 
 
 
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement as of the Effective Date.

Kapalua Bay, LLC

By:

Kapalua Bay Holdings, LLC, its Member

By: MLP KB Partner, LLC, its Managing Member

By: Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc.

/s/ Ryan Churchill

By:
Name: Ryan Churchill
Title: President

/s/ Tim T. Esaki

By:
Name: Tim T. Esaki
Title: Chief Financial Officer

The Ritz-Carlton Management Company, LLC

By:
/s/ Craig Ouellette
Name: /s/ Craig Ouellette
Title: Senior Director, Asset Management

The Ritz-Carlton Development Company, Inc.

/s/ John E. Geller

By:
Name: John E. Geller
Title: Vice President

MH Kapalua Venture, LLC
By:
Name: John E. Geller
Title: Vice President

/s/ John E. Geller

Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc.

/s/ Ryan Churchill

By:
Name: Ryan Churchill
Title: President

/s/ Tim T. Esaki

By:
Name: Tim T. Esaki
Title: Chief Financial Officer

10

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exclusive Resorts, Inc.
/s/ Sara Bayko
By:
Sara Bayko
Name:
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
Title:

Maui Holdings JV LLC
By:
Name:
Title:

/s/ L. Andy Mitchell
L. Andy Mitchell
Authorized Signatory

Lantern Asset Management, LLC

By:
Name:
Title:

/s/ L. Andy Mitchell
L. Andy Mitchell
President

Island Investors, LLC

By:
Name:
Title:

/s/ L. Andy Mitchell
L. Andy Mitchell
Authorized Signatory

Island Acquisitions Kapalua, LLC

By:
Name:
Title:

/s/ L. Andy Mitchell
L. Andy Mitchell
Authorized Signatory

Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc.

By:
Name:
Title:

/s/ Jonas Stiklorius
Jonas Stiklorius
Authorized Signatory

11

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc.—Subsidiaries
As of December 31, 2013

Name

Exhibit 21

State of
Incorporation

Percentage
of Ownership

Maui Pineapple Company, Ltd.
Kapalua Land Company, Ltd.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hawaii
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hawaii
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hawaii
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hawaii
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hawaii
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Hawaii

Kapalua Realty Company, Ltd.
Kapalua Advertising Company, Ltd.
Kapalua Water Company, Ltd.
Kapalua Waste Treatment Company, Ltd.
Kapalua Bay Holdings, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware
Kapalua Bay, LLC . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Delaware

100
100
100
100
100
100
51
100

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the  incorporation by reference in Registration  Statements  No. 333-133898 and
No. 333-112932 on Form S-8, and Registration Statement No. 333-150244 on  Form S-3 of  our report
dated March 20, 2014, relating to the consolidated financial  statements  of Maui Land  & Pineapple
Company, Inc. and subsidiaries (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes  an
explanatory paragraph regarding going  concern uncertainty), appearing in this  Annual  Report  on
Form 10-K of Maui Land & Pineapple  Company, Inc. and subsidiaries for the  year ended
December 31, 2013.

Exhibit 23.1

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Honolulu, Hawaii
March  20,  2014

Exhibit 31.1

I, Warren H. Haruki, certify that:

CERTIFICATION

1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report  on Form 10-K of Maui Land &  Pineapple  Company, Inc. (the
‘‘Registrant’’);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does  not  contain any untrue statement  of  a material fact or

omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,  in light  of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period  covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and  other financial  information included in  this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial  condition, results of operations and  cash
flows of the Registrant as of, and for,  the periods  presented in this report;

4. The Registrant’s other certifying  officer and I  are responsible  for establishing  and maintaining

disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in  Exchange  Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting  (as  defined in  Exchange Act  Rules 13a-15(f)  and
15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls  and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and

procedures to be designed under  our supervision,  to  ensure that material  information relating
to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others  within
those entities, particularly during  the period in which  this  report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial  reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under  our  supervision, to  provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting  and  the preparation of financial statements for
external  purposes in accordance with generally accepted  accounting  principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the  Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and

presented in this report our conclusions about  the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period  covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in  the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting

that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent  fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that  has materially  affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over  financial  reporting; and

5. The Registrant’s other certifying  officer and I  have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors  and the audit committee of
the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the  design or operation of internal

control over financial reporting which  are reasonably likely  to  adversely affect  the Registrant’s
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other employees who have  a

significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over  financial  reporting.

Date:  March  20,  2014

By:

/s/ WARREN H. HARUKI

Warren H. Haruki
Chairman of the Board &
Chief Executive Officer
Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc.

Exhibit 31.2

I, Tim T. Esaki, certify that:

CERTIFICATION

1.

I have reviewed this Annual Report  on Form 10-K of Maui Land &  Pineapple  Company, Inc. (the
‘‘Registrant’’);

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does  not  contain any untrue statement  of  a material fact or

omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,  in light  of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period  covered by this
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and  other financial  information included in  this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial  condition, results of operations and  cash
flows of the Registrant as of, and for,  the periods  presented in this report;

4. The Registrant’s other certifying  officer and I  are responsible  for establishing  and maintaining

disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in  Exchange  Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e))
and internal control over financial reporting  (as  defined in  Exchange Act  Rules 13a-15(f)  and
15d-15(f)) for the Registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls  and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and

procedures to be designed under  our supervision,  to  ensure that material  information relating
to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others  within
those entities, particularly during  the period in which  this  report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial  reporting, or caused such internal control over
financial reporting to be designed under  our  supervision, to  provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting  and  the preparation of financial statements for
external  purposes in accordance with generally accepted  accounting  principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the  Registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and

presented in this report our conclusions about  the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and
procedures, as of the end of the period  covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in  the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting

that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent  fiscal quarter (the Registrant’s fourth fiscal
quarter in the case of an annual report) that  has materially  affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Registrant’s internal control over  financial  reporting; and

5. The Registrant’s other certifying  officer and I  have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation
of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors  and the audit committee of
the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the  design or operation of internal

control over financial reporting which  are reasonably likely  to  adversely affect  the Registrant’s
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or other employees who have  a

significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over  financial  reporting.

Date:  March  20,  2014

By:

/s/ TIM T. ESAKI

Tim T. Esaki
Chief Financial Officer
Maui Land & Pineapple Company, Inc.

CERTIFICATION

EXHIBIT 32.1

In connection with the Annual Report of Maui Land  &  Pineapple Company, Inc. (the

‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-K for the fiscal  year  ended December 31, 2013,  as filed  with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2014 (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Chairman  of the Board  and Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant  to  Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)) and  18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the
best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report  fairly  presents, in all material respects,  the

financial condition and results of operations of  the Company.

By:

/s/ WARREN H. HARUKI

Warren H. Haruki
Chairman of the Board
Chief Executive Officer

March  20,  2014

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)  or  Rule 15d-14(b) under  the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and  18  U.S.C.  Section 1350 and shall  not be deemed filed by the
Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

CERTIFICATION

EXHIBIT 32.2

In connection with the Annual Report of Maui Land  &  Pineapple Company, Inc. (the

‘‘Company’’) on Form 10-K for the fiscal  year  ended December 31, 2013,  as filed  with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 20, 2014 (the ‘‘Report’’), I, Tim T.  Esaki, Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to Rule  13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b)  of  the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d)) and  18 U.S.C. Section 1350,  that to the best of  my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the  requirements of  Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report  fairly  presents, in all material respects,  the

financial condition and results of operations of  the Company.

By:

/s/ TIM T. ESAKI

Tim T. Esaki
Chief Financial Officer
March  20,  2014

This certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b)  or  Rule 15d-14(b) under  the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and  18  U.S.C.  Section 1350 and shall  not be deemed filed by the
Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.