ABN 51 127 297 170 
Metal Bank Limited 
 and its controlled entities 
Annual Financial Report 
For the year ended 
   30 June 2014 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITY 
CONTENTS 
Letter from the Chair 
Review of Operations 
Corporate Governance 
Directors’ Report 
Auditor’s Independence Declaration 
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income 
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position 
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 
Notes to the Financial Statements 
Directors’ Declaration 
Independent Audit Report to the Members of Metal Bank Limited 
Additional Information for Listed Companies 
Corporate Directory 
      1 
2 – 11 
12- 20 
21 – 26 
     27 
     28 
     29 
     30 
     31 
32 – 56 
    57 
58 – 59 
60 – 62 
       63 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITY 
LETTER FROM THE CHAIR 
            Dear Shareholder 
On  behalf  of  the  Directors  of  Metal  Bank  Limited  (Metal  Bank,  MBK  or  the  Company),  I  am 
pleased to report on the activities of the Company for the year ended 30 June 2014. 
Significant  progress  was  made  during  the  year  following  the  capital  raising  of  $1.75  million  in 
August  2013  and  the  acquisition  of  Roar  Resources  Pty  Ltd  that  brought  to  MBK  the  Triumph 
and Eidsvold gold projects later in the year. 
The Roar acquisition was for shares only in the amount of 106,944,444 shares at a deemed price 
of 2 cents per share or $2.1 million. 
Through  the  above  transactions  the  Company  acquired  capital,  a  major  project  and  an 
exploration team, including consultants, with significant ability and resource experience. 
The  focus  for  the  year  has  been  on  the  Triumph  and  Eidsvold  projects.  In  Triumph  we  have 
identified  an  underexplored  intrusion  related  gold  camp  extending  over  15km².  Ground 
exploration and airborne magnetics have identified eleven priority drill targets, one of which – 
Bald Hill, was drilled during the year with encouraging results. 
At Eidsvold, a further intrusion related gold district, the Company has similarly identified several 
priority  targets.  Drilling  at  the  Mt  Brady  prospect  intersected  strongly  anomalous  gold 
mineralisation  in  all  four  holes  providing  support  for  further  exploration  within  a  10km  long 
structural corridor in this region. 
MBK plans to continue exploration work on these projects with a view to moving them towards 
resource  definition.  In  addition  the  Company  continues  to  review  new  projects  which  may 
complement  its  existing  portfolio  and  which  it  could  develop  thereby  adding  to  shareholder 
wealth. 
From a corporate perspective we have been focusing on strengthening our governance through 
compiling  a  Directors  skills  matrix  and  updating  our  policies  and  procedures.    This  work  is 
important as a foundation to support the growth of MBK which is planned for 2014 and 2015. 
On behalf of the Board of Directors I would like to thank shareholders for their ongoing support. 
Yours faithfully, 
Inés Scotland 
Non-executive Chair 
26 September 2014 
1 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
REVIEW OF OPERATIONS 
REVIEW OF OPERATIONS 
The operations of the consolidated entity during the year are as described below: 
Figure 1: Metal Bank Limited – Current Project Locations 
In late 2013 Shareholders approved the acquisition of Roar Resources Pty Ltd which holds the Triumph and 
Eidsvold gold projects in south east Queensland. 
Triumph and Eidsvold Projects 
These projects were the focus of the Company’s exploration activities during the year. 
Figure 2: Triumph and Eidsvold projects 
2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
REVIEW OF OPERATIONS 
Triumph Project (100% MBK) – Gold 
Metal Bank completed drilling at the Triumph gold project following the 100% acquisition of Roar Resources 
Pty Ltd in October 2013 with a total of 10 holes completed for 1727 metres.  
The project is an intrusion related gold camp centred about the historical high grade Norton goldfield (mined 
in  the  late  1800’s  and  again  in  the  1990’s)  located  between  Mt  Rawdon  (2  Moz  Au)  gold  mine  and  the 
historical Mt Morgan (8 Moz Au and 0.4 Mt Cu) mine in the Northern New England Orogen. 
Exploration  by  Metal  Bank  demonstrates  that  the  Triumph  gold  camp  extends    over  15km2,  of  which 
approximately  90%  is  concealed  beneath  shallow  sedimentary  cover  rocks  (<10m  thick),  masking  the 
prospective  basement  rocks.  The  district  remains  highly  under  explored  with  almost  the  entire  focus  of 
historical  exploration  and  mining  being  contained  within  a  small  mining  lease  (~0.2km2  in  area)  located 
within an outcropping area in the centre of the goldfield.  
Metal Bank has identified eleven priority targets areas (refer Figure 3) within the interpreted 15km2 Triumph 
gold camp with Bald Hill representing the first of these targets to be drill tested. Detailed airborne magnetics 
data  has  proved  an  essential  tool  for  the  identification  of  prospective  structural  zones  and  areas  of 
hydrothermal alteration beneath the shallow cover sediments. Rock chip sampling within basement windows 
(exposed beneath the cover sediments) has returned results of greater than 5g/t Au from each of the targets 
areas with four of the targets returning in excess of 50g/t Au (up to 255g/t Au), refer to Figure 3. 
Figure 3: Triumph gold camp showing priority targets and rock chip geochemistry. 
3
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
REVIEW OF OPERATIONS 
At Bald Hill an initial diamond drill programme intersected gold mineralisation associated with an east west 
trending  structural  zone  of  intense  hydrothermal  alteration  /  veining  (greater  than  20m  true  width) 
coincident with an IP chargeability anomaly (refer to Figure 4 showing the location of the drill holes). The 
best result received to date is 9m @ 3.6g/t Au from 114m (TDH008) with TDH007 intersecting a broad gold 
zone  of  27m @ 0.43g/t  Au  approximately  100m  west,  along  strike.  Refer  to  Table  1  for  significant  gold 
mineralisation intersected.  
This  drill  programme  represents  the  first  mineral  exploration  at  Bald  Hill  in  over  25  years  since  AMOCO 
completed  seven  initial  percussion  holes  (open  hole).  While  all  of  the  AMOCO  holes  intersected  gold 
mineralisation they were too shallow (30 to 50m hole depth) to penetrate the entire mineralised structure. 
It is also likely that some of these holes ended in the shallow historical underground workings. 
Table 1 showing mineralisation intersections in drilling 
Hole ID 
Prospect 
TDH007 
Bald Hill 
*Drill 
Method 
DD 
Easting  Northing 
RL 
Azi 
Dip 
Depth 
Results 
334970 
7309897 
139.0 
7.5 
-60 
174.6m 
TDH008 
Bald Hill 
TDH009 
Bald Hill 
TDH010  Norton 
Fault 
DD 
DD 
DD 
335092 
7309852 
152.0 
15.0 
-50 
174.6m 
334885 
7309892 
121.9 
15.0 
-50 
171.8m 
334885 
7309892 
123.3 
240 
-60 
144.3m 
TDH011 
Bald Hill 
DD 
335241 
7309948 
144.1 
225 
-63 
252.8m 
TDH012  Galena 
RCD 
334074 
7309204 
130.9 
TDH013 
Bald Hill 
TDH014 
Bald Hill 
TDH015 
Bald Hill 
RC 
RC 
RC 
334954 
7309979 
132.1 
335098 
7310085 
133.8 
335136 
7309946 
148.6 
TDH016 
Bald Hill 
RCD 
335102 
7310086 
134.0 
-50 
249.9m 
-50 
102.0m 
-50 
63.0m 
-50 
93.0m 
-50 
300.6m 
180.
0 
210.
0 
210.
0 
210.
0 
210.
0 
1.2m @ 0.82g/t Au and 7g/t Ag from 5.6m 
3m @ 1.65g/t Au from 14m 
1m @ 0.80g/t Au and 5g/t Ag from 56m 
1m @ 1.57g/t Au and 16g/t Ag from 79m 
6m @ 0.95g/t Au, 19g/t Ag and 0.12% Cu from 91m 
1m @ 0.91g/t Au and 13g/t Ag from 100m 
2m @ 0.92g/t Au, 33g/t Ag and 0.17% Cu from 109m 
1m @ 0.69g/t Au, 25g/t Ag, and 0.30% Cu from 114m 
(27m @ 0.43g/t Au and 11g/t Ag from 89m to 116m) 
9m @ 3.6g/t Au and 8g/t Ag from 114m 
Incl. 1m @ 21.8g/t Au and 19g/t Ag from 122m 
No significant results >0.5g/t Au 
0.9m@ 4.44g/t Au from 6m (alluvial gravel) 
1m @ 2.94g/t Au from 33m 
1m @ 2.18g/t Au from 68m 
1m @ 0.88g/t Au from 95m 
1m @ 1.51g/t Au from 130m 
1m @ 0.61g/t Au from 132m 
1m @ 0.55g/t Au from 137m 
1m @ 0.92g/t Au from 159m 
(10m @ 0.23g/t Au from 129m to 139m) 
1m @ 1.04g/t Au from 132m 
4m @ 1.32g/t Au from 137m 
(21m @ 0.35g/t Au and 1.9g/t Ag from 37m to 58m) 
RC precollar abandoned (redrilled TDH016RCD) 
No significant results >0.5g/t Au 
1m @ 0.84g/t Au from 23m 
1m @ 1.53g/t Au from 41m 
(7m @ 0.29g/t Au and 2.6g/t Ag from 18m to 25m ) 
No significant results >0.5g/t Au 
Gold results shown using a 0.5 g/t cut-off 
(gold results shown using a 0.1 g/t cut-off – to highlight zones of anomalous gold) 
*DD – diamond core, RC – reverse circulation drilling, RCD – reverse circulation drilling with a diamond core tail 
4
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
REVIEW OF OPERATIONS 
Figure 4: Bald Hill target area showing Metal Bank and historical drill locations. 
Subsequent modelling of geological, drilling and geophysical data has identified a high grade target zone at 
Bald Hill which is interpreted to extend from surface to more than 100m below surface where 9m @ 3.6 g/t Au 
was intersected and also remains open at depth (refer Figure 5). The surface expression of the high grade gold 
target is defined by a highly elevated gold-in-soil anomaly of 0.1g/t Au to 0.9g/t Au together with typical 
pathfinder elements such as Ag-Bi-As-Sb. The peak soil anomaly measures greater than 200m x ~50m and is 
coincident with shallow historical underground gold workings which extend to approximately 10m below 
surface (Figure 5 and Figure 6). 
Only  a  limited  amount  of  drilling  has  been  completed  at  Bald  Hill  which  provides  alteration  and  metal 
zonation  vectors  towards  the  high  grade  target  zone.  Recent  drilling  has  intersected  broad  zones  of  low 
grade gold mineralisation including 21m @ 0.35g/t Au (TDH013) and 27m @ 0.43g/t Au (TDH007) interpreted 
to represent the margins of the higher grade central target zone. 
5
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
REVIEW OF OPERATIONS 
Figure 5: Bald Hill long-section showing high grade target zone 
A  3D  induced  polarisation  (3DIP)  survey  was  completed  over  the  central  portion  of  Bald  Hill  which 
highlighted the current mineralisation but also indicates a ‘pipe like’ feeder structure immediately to the east 
of the high grade gold target and extending to depth (Figure 6). Elevated soil geochemistry (max. 121ppb Au) 
occurs where the structure intersects the surface adding support to our interpretation.  
Figure 6: Left figure - Bald Hill 3D induced polarisation inversion model (geophysical data) showing 8mv/v IP 
‘shell’ which corresponds to sulphide mineralisation from available drilling data. Right figure - Slice through 
model which corresponds to the upper portion of the long section shown in figure 1, 8mv/v and 9mv/v shells 
shown. 
6
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
REVIEW OF OPERATIONS 
The next phase of drilling will not only continue to target shallow high grade gold resource potential but also 
test  the  potential  that  the  ‘pipe  like’  /  feeder  represented  by  the  IP  chargeability  data  and  interpreted  to 
represent a Kidston breccia style system (3Moz Au). 
Gold results from a single drill hole (TDH010) targeting the Norton Fault Zone have returned 1m @ 2.94g/t Au 
and 1m @ 2.18g/t Au. This is the first drill hole to target the structure which can be traced under shallow cover 
via magnetics data for over 6km (Figure 3 and Figure 4).  
The  Norton  Fault  is  interpreted  as  an  important  regional  structure  that  has  not  only  been  active  post 
mineralisation  but  potentially  active  during  the  main  gold  mineralisation  event.  Confirmation  of  gold 
mineralisation  associated  with  the  fault  significant  increases  the  prospectivity  of  the  6km  long  structure.  A 
flexure in the Norton fault where the Bald Hill gold mineralised trend intersects is drill ready (figure 4).  
Eidsvold Project (100% MBK) - gold 
The project is centered on the historical Eidsvold goldfield (100,000 oz Au mined in the early 1900’s) within the 
Eidsvold Intrusive Complex, located between Cracow (3 Moz Au) and Mt Rawdon (2 Moz Au) gold mines in the 
Northern New England Orogen. 
Exploration by Metal Bank has shown the Eidsvold Intrusive Complex (granodiorite-diorite-gabbro) to represent 
an overlooked and highly prospective intrusion related gold district with initial drill results returning high grade 
mineralisation.  The  vast  majority  of  the  intrusive  complex  is  concealed  beneath  post  mineral  sedimentary 
cover. Based on structural / alteration interpretations, Metal Bank has identified several priority targets within 
a  10km  corridor  which  extends  north  from  the  100,000  oz  Au  Eidsvold  goldfield  to  Mt  Brady  where  initial 
drilling has intersected high grade gold (Figure 7).  
At  Mt  Brady  a  total  of  4  diamond  drill  holes  for  685m  targeted  two  geophysical  (induced  polarisation)  ± 
geochemical  targets.  On  surface,  central  to  the  geophysical  /  geochemical  targets,  hydrothermal  breccia 
returned  grab  samples  up  to  14.7  g/t  Au  with  soil  geochemistry  defining  a  coincident    Au-Ag-As-Sb-Bi-Te  ± 
Cu/Pb/Zn anomaly. The multielement association at Mt Brady of Au-Cu-Ag-As-Bi-Te is typical of intrusion driven 
hydrothermal  systems.  All  4  holes  intersected  zones  of  strongly  anomalous  gold  mineralisation  with  the  best 
drill results shown in Table 1 and the location of the drill holes shown in Figure 8. Importantly, Mt Brady is the 
only one of the priority targets identified that actually outcrops.  
Table 1 showing mineralisation intersections in drilling. 
Azi 
Easting  Northing 
Prospect 
Hole ID 
*Drill 
Method 
Dip 
Depth 
Results 
MBDD001 
Mt Brady 
DD 
309583 
7203278 
334.5 
-60 
218.0m 
1m @ 17.45g/t Au, 90g/t Ag, and 2.5% Cu 
from 136m 
MBDD002 
Mt Brady 
DD 
309759 
7203383 
270 
-55 
234.7m 
No significant results above 0.5g/t Au cut-off 
MBDD003 
Mt Brady 
DD 
309055 
7203378 
270 
-80 
130.0m 
1m @ 0.73 g/t Au from 106m 
MBDD004 
Mt Brady 
DD 
309524 
7203360 
115 
-50 
102.3m 
1m @ 6.28 g/t Au from 27m 
Gold results shown using a 0.5 g/t cut-off 
*True width of mineralisation is not known 
7
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
REVIEW OF OPERATIONS 
Figure 7: Eidsvold Project and the location of the Mt Brady target. 
The priority targets for the Eidsvold Project are as follows: 
1.  Mt Brady target – Identified high grade gold mineralisation to be defined with further drilling in 
addition to other geochemical / structural targets identified within multiphase intrusive complex. 
2.  Forty Horse target areas – Breccia and sheeted vein style gold mineralisation associated with 
alteration / structural targets (magnetic lows) within a 10km structural corridor (N-S trending) 
between the Eidsvold Goldfield and Mt Brady beneath Jurassic cover sediments. 
3.  Regional magnetic targets (both structural and alteration) beneath Jurassic cover sediments. 
8
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
REVIEW OF OPERATIONS 
Figure 8: Location of drilling on the Mt Brady target. 
A  targeted  exploration  program  is  planned  which  will  not  only  continue  to  focus  on  the  Mt  Brady  mineral 
system  but  also  advance  targets  within  the  10km  long  structural  corridor  (Forty  Horse  target) that extends 
beneath  shallow  sedimentary  cover  from  the  Eidsvold  goldfield  in  the  south  through  to  Mt  Brady  in  the 
north. Refer to Figure 7. 
Spinifex Ridge East (80% MBK) – Gold/Copper 
The  Spinifex  Ridge  East  Project  (54km2)  is  located  in  the  Pilbara  region  of  Western  Australia  and  lies 
immediately along strike from the Spinifex Ridge Copper Molybdenum deposit containing a mineral resources 
of approximately 300,000t of Mo and 500,000t Cu. (refer to Moly Mines Limited web site ASX:MOL) 
A  field  visit  was  completed  over  the  project  which  confirmed  the prospectivity of the Norms Find prospect. 
Previous  sampling  at  Norms  Find  by  Metal  Bank  has  returned high grade gold and copper results of 30.8g/t 
Au, 154g/t Ag, and 6.5% Cu (Norms Find prospect).  
Remarkably,  no  drilling  has  even  been  conducted  on  the  project  despite  its  proximity  to  a  major  Cu-Mo 
deposit and the mapped presence of porphyritic intrusive rocks interpreted to be a part of the same intrusion 
driven mineral system. The forward exploration programme is under review. 
9
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
REVIEW OF OPERATIONS 
Figure 9: Showing the Regional Geology of the project and location of priority Cu-Au targets 
Mt Mckenzie Project – Copper/Molybdynum/Gold 
The  project  lies  approximately  40km  north  east  of  the  Mt  Carlton  mining  operation  Au-Ag-Cu  (Evolution 
Mining). The target for the project is porphyry style Cu-Mo-Au mineralisation associated with regional NW 
trending  structures.  A  detailed  review  of  the  historical  exploration  data  has  identified  several  Cu-Mo 
anomalies  (with  no  historical  Au  analysis).    These  anomalies  have  received  limited  previous follow-up and 
represent priority targets for MBK. 
CORPORATE 
On  13  August  the  Company  appointed  Inés  Scotland  as  Chair  of  the  Company,  replacing  Mr  Tony  Ho  who 
retired. 
Ms  Scotland  was  most  recently  the  Managing  Director  and  CEO  of  Ivanhoe  Australia,  an  ASX  listed  entity 
with a market capitalisation of $500m. 
Prior to this Inés was the Managing Director and CEO of Citadel Resource Group Limited, which at the time 
of acquisition by Equinox in 2011, was developing the Jabal Sayid Copper Project in Saudi Arabia and, had a 
market capitalisation of $1.3B.  
Mr  Tony  Schreck  was  appointed  to  the  Board  as  an  executive  director  as  part  of  the  acquisition  of  Roar 
Resources Pty Ltd which was settled with the issue of 106,944,444 Company shares at a deemed price of 2 
cents per share.   
Mr George Frangeskides resigned as a director on 27 December 2013. 
In addition the Company issued 15,000,000 options to management (exercisable at 3 cents prior to 30 
November 2018) and 15,000,000 shares at a deemed price of 2 cents per share to advisors to the acquisition 
and for services in relation to capital raising. 
Anthony Schreck 
Executive Director 
26 September 2014 
10
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
REVIEW OF OPERATIONS 
Schedule of Tenements 
Mining Tenements 
Location 
Percentage Interest 
Roar Resources Pty Ltd (Wholly Owned Subsidiary)  
Triumph Project 
EPM 18486 
EPM 19343 
Eidsvold Project 
EPM 18431 
EPM 18753 
EPM 19548 
Queensland 
Queensland 
Queensland 
Queensland 
Queensland 
100% 
100% 
100% 
100% 
100% 
Spinifex Ridge East Pty Ltd (80% Owned) 
E45/2596 
Metal  Bank 
Owned) 
EPM15668 
Limited 
(100% 
Spinifex Ridge East, WA 
80% 
Mount McKenzie, QLD 
100% 
E – Exploration Licence; EPM – Exploration Permit 
Competent Persons Statement 
The  information in this Report that relates to Exploration Results is based on information compiled or reviewed 
by Mr Tony Schreck, who is a Member of The Australasian Institute of Geoscientists. Mr Schreck is an employee of 
the  Company.  Mr  Schreck  has  sufficient  experience  which  is  relevant  to  the  style  of  mineralisation  and  type  of 
deposit  under  consideration  and  to  the  activity  which  he  is  undertaking  to  qualify  as  a  Competent  Person  as 
defined in the 2012 Edition of the ‘Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and 
Ore Reserves’. Mr Schreck consents to the inclusion in the Report of the matters based on his information in the 
form and context in which it applies. 
The Exploration Targets described in this report are conceptual in nature and there is insufficient information to 
establish  whether  further  exploration  will  result  in  the  determination  of  Mineral  Resources.    Any  resources 
referred to in this report are not based on estimations of Ore Reserves or Mineral Resources made in accordance 
with  the  JORC  Code  and  caution  should  be  exercised  in  any  external  technical  or  economic  evaluation.
11
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITY 
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 
Metal  Bank  Limited  (“Metal  Bank”),  through  its  board  and  executives,  recognises the need to establish and 
maintain corporate governance policies and practices that reflect the requirements of the market regulators 
and participants, and the expectations of members and others who deal with Metal Bank. These policies and 
practices remain under constant review as the corporate governance environment and good practices evolve.  
ASX Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations 
The Metal Bank board has elected to adopt and report against the third edition of ASX Corporate Governance 
Council  Principles  and  Recommendations  (the  Principles”).    Accordingly,  this  Corporate  Governance 
Statement  is  dated  and  was  approved  by  the  board  on  11  September  2014  and  a  copy  is  included in Metal 
Bank’s 2014 Annual Report. 
As  Metal  Bank  currently  has  only  a  small  market  capitalisation  and  only  three  directors  it  is  unable  at  this 
stage  of  its  development  to  report  full  compliance  with  the  Principles.  Where  its  processes  do  not  fit  the 
Principles,  the  board  believes  that  there  are  good  reasons  for  the  different  approach  being  adopted.    A 
summary of the areas of non-compliance and reasons are as follows:  
•  Recommendation 1.5: The Company has, as yet, no established policy in relation to gender diversity. 
The company has only one full time employee and as a consequence the opportunity for creating a 
meaningful gender diversity policy is limited. 
•  Recommendation  2.4:  Metal  Bank’s  board  is  not  comprised  of  a majority of independent directors.  
The  board  has  determined  that,  consistent  with  the  size  of  the  Company  and  its  strategy  and 
activities, the board shall be comprised of three directors, two of whom are executive directors. 
•  Recommendation  4.2:    Declarations  regarding  the  annual  and  half  year  financial  statements  are 
received  from  the  two  executive  directors  who  perform  functions  usually  undertaken  by  a  CEO  or 
CFO.  The Board has resolved that declarations regarding the Quarterly Report will also be provided 
commencing from the September 2014 Quarterly. 
The eight Principles and the Company’s position in respect of each of them, are set out below: 
Principle 1: Lay solid foundations for management and oversight  
1.1 
a) 
b) 
A listed entity should disclose: 
the respective roles and responsibilities of the board and management; and 
those matters expressly reserved to the board and those delegated to management. 
The respective roles and responsibilities of Metal Bank’s Board and management and those matters expressly 
reserved  to  the  board  and  those  delegated  to  management  are  set  out  in  detail  in  the  Metal  Bank  Board 
Charter,  a  copy  of  which  is  included  on  the  Corporate  Governance  page  of  the  Company’s  website 
www.metalbank.com.au. 
The  board’s  role  is  to  govern  the  Company  in  the  best  interests  of  the  shareholders  as  a  whole,  including 
setting  the  Company’s  strategy,  promoting  and  protecting  the  Company’s  interests  and  overseeing  the 
management of the Company. 
The board is responsible for: 
•  Overseeing, approving and monitoring the Company's strategic and operating objectives, acquisitions 
and divestments; 
•  Reviewing  and  approving  the  Company's  systems  of  risk  management  and  internal  compliance and 
control,  including  the  integrity  of  the  Company’s    accounting  and corporate reporting systems, and 
monitoring the performance of the Company in these areas; 
•  Approving and monitoring annual budgets, major capital expenditure and capital management; 
•  Approving  and  adopting  documents  required  by  laws  or  external  regulation,  including  annual  and 
financial reports and statements to shareholders; 
•  Monitoring the operational and financial position and performance of the Company; 
12
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITY 
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 
•  Appointment and removal of a CEO and/or managing director, executive directors and the Company 
Secretary,  evaluation  their  performance  and  approving  the  terms  and  conditions  of  employment 
including remuneration; 
•  Delegating  authority  to  the  executive  directors  to  ensure  the  effective  day-to-day  management  of 
the business of the Company and monitoring the exercise of such delegated authority; 
• 
•  Ratifying  the  appointment  and  removal  of  senior  executive  positions  reporting  to  the  managing  or 
executive directors and determining whether the terms and conditions (including remuneration) are 
appropriate, 
Ensuring  that  policies  and  procedures  are  in  place  consistent  with  the  Company's  objectives, 
corporate governance standards and relevant laws and monitoring compliance in these areas; and 
Ensuring  corporate  accountability  to  the  shareholders  through  an  effective  shareholder 
communications strategy.   
• 
The Metal Bank board consists of two executive directors, with responsibilities for finance and accounting and 
management of exploration activities, respectively. 
An  executive  director’s  primary  objective  is  to  ensure  the  ongoing  success  of  the  Company  through  being 
responsible  for  those  aspects  of  the  management  and  development  of  the  Company  delegated  to  the 
executive director by the Board in accordance with his or her terms of engagement. 
Duties of executive directors include to: 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
devote  the  whole  of  his  or  her  time,  attention  and  skill  during  normal  business  hours  and at other 
times as reasonably necessary, to the duties of the office; 
develop with the Board the ongoing corporate strategy; implementing and monitoring strategy and 
reporting to the Board on current and future initiatives; 
be  accountable  for  planning,  coordinating  and  directing  the  operations  of  the  Company  to  achieve 
strategic, financial and operating objectives as agreed with the Board; 
promote the interests of the Company;  
advise  the  Board  regarding  the  most  effective  organisational  structure  and  oversee 
implementation; 
assess business opportunities of potential benefit to the Company; 
recommend policies to the Board in relation to a range of organisational issues including delegations 
of authority; 
ensure statutory, legal and regulatory compliance and comply with corporate policies and standards; 
and 
Ensure appropriate risk management practices and policies are in place. 
its 
1.2 
A listed entity should: 
a)  undertake appropriate checks before appointing a person, or putting forward to security holders 
a candidate for election as a director; and 
b)  provide security holders with all material information in its possession relevant to a decision on 
whether or not to elect or re-elect a director. 
The  board  of  Metal  Bank  has  determined  that  it  will  ensure  appropriate  checks  are  undertaking  prior  to 
appointing  a  person,  or  putting  a  person  forward  to  shareholders  as  a  candidate  for  election  as  a  director.  
These will include checks as to the person’s character, experience, education, criminal record and bankruptcy 
history, where required.   
Information  about  a  candidate  standing  for  election  or  re-election  as  a  director  will  be  provided  to 
shareholders  to  enable  them  to  make  an  informed  decision  on  whether  or  not  to  elect  or  re-elect  the 
candidate.  This information may include: 
• 
• 
biographical details, including relevant qualifications, experience and skills; 
details of other material directorships; 
13
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITY 
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 
• 
• 
• 
• 
a statement regarding whether the director qualifies as independent; 
any material adverse information or potential conflicts of interest, position or association; 
the term of office currently served (for directors standing for re-election); and 
a statement whether the board supports the election or re-election of the candidate. 
1.3 
A  listed  entity  should  have  a  written agreement with each director and senior executive setting out 
the terms of their appointment. 
All directors and senior executives of Metal Bank have a written agreement with the Company setting out the 
terms of their appointment. 
1.4 
The  Company  secretary  of  a  listed  entity  should  be  accountable  directly  to  the  board,  through  the 
chair, on all matters to do with the proper functioning of the board. 
The  Company  Secretary  of  Metal  Bank  is  accountable  to  the  board  on  all  governance  matters  and  reports 
directly to the Chairman as the representative of the board.  
The Company Secretary is appointed and dismissed by the board.  
The Company Secretary’s advice and services are available to all directors. 
1.5 
A listed entity should: 
a) 
b) 
c) 
have a diversity policy which includes requirement for the board or a relevant committee of 
the board to set measurable objectives for achieving gender diversity and to assess annually 
both the objectives and the entity’s progress in achieving them;  
disclose that policy or a summary of it; and 
disclose at the end of each reporting period the measurable objectives for achieving gender 
diversity  set  by  the  board  or  a  relevant  committee  of  the  board  in  accordance  with  the 
entity’s diversity policy and its progress towards achieving them, and either: 
1) 
the  respective  proportions  of  men  and  women  on  the  board,  in  senior  executive 
positions  and  across  the  whole  organisation  (including  how  the  entity  has  defined 
“senior executive” for these purpose); or 
if  the  entity  is  a  “relevant  employer”  under  the  Workplace  Gender  Equality  Act,  the 
entity’s  most  recent  “Gender  Equality  Indicators”  as  defined  in  and  published  under 
that Act. 
2) 
As  set  out  in  its  Code  of  Ethical  Business  Conduct,  Metal Bank is committed to developing, maintaining and 
supporting  a  diverse  workforce.    The  Company  has,  as  yet,  no  established  policy  in  relation  to  gender 
diversity. The company has only one full time employee and as a consequence the opportunity for creating a 
meaningful gender diversity policy is limited.   
The Company will disclose at the end of each reporting period the respective proportions of men and women 
on the board and in senior executive positions.  Currently the board comprises three members, one of which 
is a woman.   The only other senior executive is the Company Secretary, who is also a woman. 
1.6 
A listed entity should: 
a)  have  and  disclose  a  process  for  periodically  evaluating  the  performance  of  the  board,  its 
committees and individual directors; and 
b)  disclose, 
in  relation  to  each  reporting  period,  whether  a  performance  evaluation  was 
undertaken in the reporting period in accordance with that process. 
The Board undertakes an annual performance evaluation of itself that: 
• 
• 
compares the performance of the Board with the requirements of its Charter; and 
effects any improvements to the Board Charter deemed necessary or desirable. 
The  performance  evaluation  is  conducted  in  such  manner as the Board deems appropriate. The Metal Bank 
board has conducted an evaluation of its role and the board’s charter during the reporting period ending 30 
June 2014 and adopted a new Board Charter, a copy of which is available on the Metal Bank website.  
1.7 
A listed entity should: 
a)  have and disclose a process for periodically evaluating the performance of its senior executives; 
and 
14
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITY 
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 
b)  disclose, 
in  relation  to  each  reporting  period,  whether  a  performance  evaluation  was 
undertaken in the reporting period in accordance with that process. 
The performance of all senior executives is reviewed at least once a year. The performance of the executive 
directors  and  other  senior  executives  is  reviewed  by  the  Chairman  on  an  annual  basis.  They  are  assessed 
against personal and Company Key Performance Indicators established from time to time as appropriate for 
the Company and their respective positions.  
Principle 2: Structure the board to add value  
2.1 
The board of a listed entity should: 
2.1.1.1 have a nomination committee; or 
2.1.1.2 if it does not have a nomination committee, disclose that fact and the processes it employs to 
address board succession issues and to ensure that the board has the appropriate balance of 
skills,  knowledge,  experience,  independence  and  diversity  to  enable  it  to  discharge  its  duties 
and responsibilities effectively. 
The  board  has  determined  that  while  it  is  comprised  of  only  three  members  the  board  as  a  whole  will 
perform the tasks and functions generally assumed by a nomination committee. 
In particular, the board is responsible for: 
• 
• 
• 
• 
determining the size, composition and performance of the board; 
nomination, appointment and re-election of directors;  
succession planning generally; and 
induction, performance evaluation and remuneration of directors and senior executives. 
The board periodically reviews its membership and composition to assess the overall mix of skills, knowledge, 
experience and backgrounds represented on the Board, including independence and diversity, to ensure it is 
able to discharge its duties and responsibilities effectively. 
New directors are selected after consultation with all board members and their appointment voted on by the 
board.   Each year, in addition to any board members appointed to fill casual vacancies during the year, one 
third  of  directors  retire  by  rotation  and  are  subject  to  re-election  by  shareholders  at  the  Annual  General 
Meeting. 
2.2 
A listed entity should have and disclose a board skills matrix setting out the mix of skills and diversity 
that the board currently has or is looking to achieve in its memberships. 
During  the  2014  financial  year,  the  Metal  Bank  board  conducted  a  governance  skills  review  regarding  the 
skills, knowledge and experience of the current board.  The skills matrix is set out in the table below. 
Executive 
Director 
Finance 
– 
Executive 
Director 
Geology 
Chair 
– 
Company 
Secretary 
15
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITY 
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 
Skills and 
Experience 
and 
Accounting 
financial 
reporting; 
corporate  finance 
and 
internal 
financial  controls; 
financial  analysis 
skills,  compliance 
and  governance 
skills. 
Project 
identification  and 
acquisition, 
exploration, 
feasibility studies, 
management  of 
exploration 
projects.  
Legal, 
compliance and 
governance 
skills;  Mergers 
and 
Acquisition; risk 
management; 
and 
people 
management 
skills.     
Executive 
Leadership; 
Independent  &  Non 
Executive  Directorship 
  Strategy 
experience; 
Development 
and 
Implementation;  Project 
Acquisition 
and 
Management;  OHSE&C 
experience;  Nomination 
and 
Remuneration 
committee  experience; 
Mining  and  Exploration 
Management; Marketing 
and  Investor  Relations; 
and Global Experience 
The  Metal  Bank  board  has  determined  that  any  addition  to  board  membership  must  be  independent  of 
shareholders and management. 
2.3 
A listed entity should disclose: 
2.3.1  the names of the directors considered by the board to be independent directors; 
2.3.2  if  a  director has an interest, position, association or relationship of the type described in Box 
2.3  of  the  Principles  but  the  board  is  of  the  opinion  that  it  does  not  compromise  the 
independence of the director, the nature of the interest, position, association or relationship in 
question and an explanation of why the board is of that opinion; and 
2.3.3  the length of service of each director. 
Guy  Robertson  is  an  executive  director  and  therefore  not  considered  independent.    He  has  served  as  a 
director since 17 September 2012. 
Tony Schreck is an executive director and therefore not considered independent.  He has served as a director 
since 29 November 2013. 
The Chair, Inés Scotland is considered to be independent.   She has served as a director since 12 August 2013. 
Ms  Scotland  is  associated  with  a  substantial  security  holder  of  the  entity,  however,  the  association  is  as 
discretionary  beneficiary.    She  is  not  a  director  or  other  officer  of  the  substantial  security  holder  and 
accordingly, the association is not considered to compromise her independence. 
2.4 
A majority of the board of a listed entity should be independent directors. 
The  board  recognizes  that  best  practice  is  to  have  a  majority  of  non-executive  directors  who  are judged by 
the  board  to  be  independent  of  judgement  and  character  and  free  of  material  relationships  with  the 
Company  and  other  entities  and  people  that  might  influence  or  would  be  perceived  by  shareholders  to 
influence such judgement.  However, the board has determined that, consistent with the size of the Company 
and  its  strategy  and  activities,  the  board  shall  be  comprised  of  three  directors,  two  of  whom  are  executive 
directors.   
The  board  will  review  membership  and  composition  of  the  board  periodically  with  a  view  to  progressively 
increasing the independent directors on the board as the Company grows. 
2.5 
The chair of the board of a listed entity should be an independent director and, in particular, should 
not be the same person as the CEO of the entity. 
The Chair, Inés Scotland is considered to be independent. 
2.6 
A  listed  entity  should  have  a  program  for  inducting  new  directors  and  provide  appropriate 
professional  development  opportunities  for  directors  to  develop  and  maintain  the  skills  and 
knowledge needed to perform their role as directors effectively. 
16
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITY 
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 
Metal  Bank  Limited  has  a  program  for  induction  of  new  directors.    Directors  are  active  in  undertaking 
professional  development  opportunities  for  the  purpose  of  development  and  maintenance  of  their  skills.  
Such  activities  are  reported  as  part  of  the  board’s  governance  skills  review,  which  also  assists  in identifying 
areas requiring further development. 
Principle 3: Act ethically and responsibly 
3.2 
A listed entity should: 
3.2.1  have a code of conduct for its directors, senior executives and employees; and 
3.2.2  disclose that code or a summary of it. 
Metal  Bank  has  a  Code  of  Ethical  Business  Conduct  which  applies  to  its  directors,  senior  executive  and 
is  available  on  the  Governance  page  of  the  Company’s  website: 
employees,  a  copy  of  which 
www.metalbank.com.au. 
Principle 4: Safeguard integrity in corporate reporting  
4.1 
the board of a listed entity should: 
4.1.1  have an audit committee; or 
4.1.2  if  it  does  not  have  an  audit  committee,  disclose  that  fact  and  the  processes  it  employs  that 
independently  verify  and  safeguard  the  integrity  of  its  corporate  reporting,  including  the 
processes  for  the  appointment  and  removal  of  the  external  auditor  and  the  rotation  of  the 
audit engagement partner. 
The  board  has  determined  that  while  it  is  comprised  of  only  three  members  the  board  as  a  whole  will 
perform the tasks and functions generally assumed by an audit committee. 
In particular, the board is responsible for: 
• 
• 
• 
• 
The  Company’s  financial  statements  and  the  adequacy  of  the  Company’s  corporate  reporting 
processes; 
The appointment, removal, rotation of the external auditor; 
The scope and adequacy of the external audit; and 
The  independence  and  performance  of  the  external  auditor,  including  provision  of  non-audit 
services. 
The  board  has  approved  a  Financial  Controls  Procedure  and  reviews  the  financial  procedures  and  controls 
adopted  by  the  Company  at  least  annually.    The  board  meets  with  and  receives  regular  reports  from  the 
external  auditors  concerning  any  matters  that  arise  in  connection  with  the  performance  of  their  role, 
including the adequacy of internal controls. 
The board is responsible for overseeing the Company’s relationship with the auditors and for determining and 
ensuring  the  independence  of  the  auditors.    The  board  has  adopted  an  External  Auditors  Policy,  a  copy  of 
which is available on the Governance page Company’s website.  Rotation of the lead partner involved in the 
external audit of the Company is required every 5 years. 
4.2 
The board of a listed entity should, before it approves the entity’s financial statements for a financial 
period, received from its CEO and CFO a declaration that, in their opinion, the financial records of the 
entity have been properly maintained and that the financial statements comply with the appropriate 
accounting standards and give a true and fair view of the financial position and performance of the 
entity and that the opinion has been formed on the basis of a sound system of risk management and 
internal control which is operating effectively.  
17
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITY 
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 
Declarations  regarding  the  financial  statements  are received from the two executive directors who perform 
functions  usually  undertaken  by  a  CEO  or  CFO.    The board received such declarations for the half year and 
annual  reports  for  2014  and  has  resolved  that  such declarations will also be provided for Quarterly reports, 
commencing with the September 2014 report. 
4.3 
A  listed  entity  that  has  an  AGM  should  ensure  that  its  external  auditor  attends  its  AGM  and  is 
available to answer questions from security holders relevant to the audit. 
Metal  Bank’s  auditor  attends  the  Company’s  AGM  in  person  and  is  available  to  answer  questions  from 
security holders relevant to the audit. 
Principle 5: Make timely and balanced disclosure  
5.1 
a listed entity should: 
5.1.1 
have a written policy for complying with is continuous disclosure obligations under the Listing 
Rules; and 
5.1.2 
disclose that policy or a summary of it.    
Metal  Bank  recognises  that  timely  and  balanced  disclosure  of  all  material  information  concerning  the 
Company  must  be  made  on  a  continuous  basis  so  as  to  ensure  that  the  market  is  informed  of  all  material 
events  and  developments  as  they  arise.    Metal  Bank’s  Continuous  Disclosure  Policy  is  available  on  the 
Governance page of the Company’s website: www.metalbank.com.au. 
Principle 6: Respect the rights of security holders  
6.1 
A listed entity should provide information about itself and its governance to investors via its website. 
Metal  Bank’s  website  includes  a  Governance  page,  which  includes  a  copy  of  this  Corporate  Governance 
Statement and various governance policies.    
6.2 
A  listed  entity  should  design  and  implement  and  investor  relations  program  to  facilitate  effective 
two-way communication with investors.  
The Company’s Shareholder Communication Policy, which is available on the Governance page of its website, 
summarises  the  Company’s  communication  program,  including  regular  reporting,  email  alerts,  active 
participation at the Company’s AGM and encouragement of shareholder communications.     
6.3 
A  listed  entity  should  disclose  the  policies  and  processes  it  has  in  place  to  facilitate  and  encourage 
participation at meetings of security holders.  
Notices  of  the  Annual  General  Meeting,  together  with  accompanying  information  such  as  the  explanatory 
memorandum, are sent to shareholders, either by mail or email, depending on the shareholder’s election, and 
are  also  placed  on  the  Company’s  website.    Shareholders  are  encouraged  to  attend  the  Annual  General 
Meeting and to ask questions. 
6.4 
A  listed  entity  should  give  security  holders  the  option  to  receive  communications  from,  and  send 
communication to, the entity and its security registry electronically.  
The  Company  provides  an  email  alert  service.    Shareholders  are  encouraged  to  register  for  this  service 
through the Company’s website and once registered will receive information by email, including ASX releases, 
annual and other reports, company presentations and notices of general meetings. 
Shareholders may also elect to receive communications from the Company’s share Registrar, Advanced Share 
Registry, by email.   
Principle 7: Recognise and manage risk  
7.1 
The board of a listed entity should: 
18
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITY 
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 
7.1.1  have a risk committee; or 
7.1.2  if  it  does  not  have  a  risk  committee,  disclose  that  fact  and  the  processes  it  employs  for 
overseeing the entity’s risk management framework. 
The  board  has  determined  that  while  it  is  comprised  of  only  three  members  the  board  as  a  whole  will 
perform the tasks and functions generally assumed by a risk committee. 
The  Company  has  established  policies  for  the  oversight  and  management  of  material  business  risks.    The 
Company’s  Risk  Management  Policy 
its  website: 
www.metalbank.com.au.    This  document  sets  out  the  Company’s policy and processes for risk management 
and the roles and responsibilities of the board, executives and employees. 
the  Governance  page  of 
is  available  on 
Metal  Bank  has  incorporated  risk  management  into  its  decision  making  and  business  planning  processes  so 
that  risks  are  identified,  analysed,  ranked  and  appropriate  risk  controls  and  risk  management  plans  are  put 
into place to manage and reduce the identified risks, with all identified risks entered into a Risk Register.   
The  risk  identification  and  management  system,  including  the  Risk  Register,  is  reviewed  annually  by  senior 
management  and  the  board  and  policies  and  practices  upgraded  where  issues  are  identified  that  require 
attention.  Reviews  of  specific  items  are  undertaken  by  senior  management  where  issues  are  identified  and 
immediate action is required. 
Risk  is  a  standing  item  on  the  agenda  of  board  meetings,  for  reporting  against  identified  material  business 
risks.  
7.2 
The board or a committee of the board should: 
7.2.1  review  the  entity’s  risk  management  framework  at  least  annually  to  satisfy  itself  that  it 
continues to be sound; and 
7.2.2  disclose in relation to each reporting period, whether such a review has taken place. 
Metal Bank’s risk policy and risk register is reviewed by the Board of Directors annually to coincide with the 
preparation and lodgement of the Company’s Annual Report.  A review was undertaken in the financial year 
ending 30 June 2014. 
7.3 
A listed entity should disclose: 
7.3.1  If it has an internal audit function, how the function is structured and what role it performs; or 
7.3.2  if  it  does  not  have  an  internal  audit  function,  that  fact  and  the  processes  it  employs  for 
evaluating  and  continually  improving  the  effectiveness  of  its  risk  management  and  internal 
control processes. 
The  board  has  determined  that,  consistent  with  the  size  of  the Company and its activities, an internal audit 
function is not currently appropriate. As noted regarding recommendations 7.1 and 7.2 above and regarding 
Principle 4 above, the board has adopted a Risk Management Policy and processes appropriate to the size of 
Metal Bank to manage the company's material business risks and to ensure regular reporting to the board on 
whether those risks are being managed effectively in accordance with the controls that are in place.   
7.4 
A listed entity should disclose whether it has any material exposure to economic, environmental and 
social sustainability risks and if it does, how it manages or intends to manage those risks. 
The  board  has  reviewed  the  Company’s  exposure  to  economic,  environmental  and  social  sustainability  risks 
and determined that, given the nature of its activities and the fact that the Company is reliant on raising funds 
for  continued  activities  from  shareholders  or  other  investors,  this represents a material economic risk.  The 
Company’s financial position is monitored on a regular basis and processes put into place to ensure that fund 
raising activities will be conducted in a timely manner to ensure the Company has sufficient funds to conduct 
its activities. 
Principle 8: Remunerate fairly and responsibly  
19
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITY 
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE 
8.1 
The board of a listed entity should: 
8.1.1  have a remuneration committee; or 
8.1.2  if it does not have a remuneration committee, disclose that fact and the processes it employs 
for setting the level and composition of remuneration for directors and senior executives and 
ensuring that such remuneration is appropriate and not excessive. 
The board has determined that while it is comprised of only three members and given the Company has only 
one  full  time  employee,  the  board  as  a  whole  will  perform  the  tasks  and  functions  generally  assumed  by  a 
remuneration  committee.    The  board  determines,  on  a  case  by  case  basis,  the  terms  and  conditions  of 
employment  of  company  executives  and  consultants,  including  remuneration.    Remuneration  for  senior 
executives  is  determined  and  reviewed  by  reference  to  the  Company’s  performance,  the  individual’s 
performance,  as  well  as  comparable  information  from  listed  companies  in  similar  industries  to  ensure  base 
remuneration is set to reflect the market for a comparable role.    
8.2 
A listed entity should separately disclose its policies and practices regarding the remuneration of non-
executive directors and the remuneration of executive directors and other senior executives. 
The remuneration details of non-executive directors, executive directors and senior management for the year 
ended  30  June  2014  are  set  out  in  the  Remuneration  Report  that  forms  part  of  the  Directors’ report in the 
Company’s Annual Report. 
The performance of the executive director and senior executives is measured against criteria agreed annually 
and incentives are linked to predetermined performance criteria and may, with shareholder approval, include 
the issue of shares and/or options. 
8.3 
A listed entity which has an equity-based remuneration scheme should: 
8.3.1  have  a  policy  on  whether  participants  are  permitted  to  enter  into  transactions  (whether 
through  the  use  of  derivatives  or  otherwise)  which  limit the economic risk of participating in 
the scheme; and 
8.3.2  disclose that policy or a summary or it. 
The Company’s Security Trading Policy, a copy of which is available on the Governance page of the Company’s 
website www.metalbank.com.au, sets out restrictions on participation by staff in hedging arrangements over 
the Company’s securities issued pursuant to any share scheme, performance right’s plan or option plan.   In 
particular: 
• 
•  Vested securities may only be hedged once they are exercised into shareholdings and only under the 
Staff are prohibited from in hedging arrangements over unvested securities; and 
following conditions: 
o 
o 
the details of the hedge are fully disclosed to the Chair and the Company Secretary (and to 
ASX and in the Annual Report, as appropriate);    
the  hedge  transaction  is  treated  as  a  dealing  in  securities  and  the  restrictions  and 
requirements of the Securities Trading Policy are satisfied; and 
o  all holding locks have been removed from the relevant securities. 
20
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITY 
DIRECTORS REPORT 
Your directors present their report on Metal Bank Limited and its subsidiaries (Consolidated Entity or the Group) 
for the year ended 30 June 2014.  
DIRECTORS 
The names of directors in office at any time during or since the end of the year are: 
Current Directors 
INĖS SCOTLAND 
NON-EXECUTIVE 
CHAIR 
B App Sc 
ANTHONY SCHRECK 
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 
B  App  Sc(Geol),  GDipSc 
(Econ Geol), MAIG 
Ms  Scotland  was  most  recently  the  Managing  Director  and  CEO  of  Ivanhoe 
Australia, an ASX listed entity with a market capitalisation of $500m. 
Prior to this Ms Scotland was the Managing Director and CEO of Citadel Resource 
Group  Limited.    Ms  Scotland  was  a  founding  shareholder of Citadel and was its 
managing director through its growth, until its acquisition by Equinox Minerals in 
January 2011.  
At  the  time  of  acquisition  by  Equinox,  Citadel  was  developing  the  Jabal  Sayid 
Copper  Project  in  Saudi  Arabia,  had  a  market  capitalisation  of  $1.3B  and  had 
raised more than $380m on the equity markets.  
Ms Scotland has worked in the mining industry for over 20 years for large scale 
gold and copper companies in Australia, Papua New Guinea, USA and the Middle 
East.  This  has  included  working  for  Rio  Tinto  companies,  Comalco,  Lihir  and 
Kennecott Utah Copper.  
Appointed 13 August 2013.  
Other current public company directorships:  
•  St Barbara Limited – non-executive director 
Former directorships in the last 3 years:  
•  Ivanhoe Australia Limited 
•  Citadel Resource Group Limited 
Mr Schreck has 25 years of mineral exploration experience in Australia and the 
South West Pacific region (Solomon Islands). He has managed large exploration 
projects  in  challenging  terrains  for  major  companies  including  North  Flinders 
Mines, Normandy, Newmont, Anglo Gold Ashanti and Xstrata. 
Mr  Schreck  is credited with the grassroots discovery of the multi-million ounce 
Twin  Bonanza  gold  system  (Buccaneer  and  Old  Pirate  gold  deposits)  in  the 
Northern Territory. He has been key in the successful startup and management 
of a number of private resource companies. 
Appointed 29 November 2013. 
Mr  Schreck  has  held  no  other  current  public  company  directorships  or  former 
directorships in the last 3 years.  
GUY ROBERTSON 
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 
B Com (Hons), CA. 
Mr  Robertson  has  more  than  30  years’  experience  as  Chief  Financial  Officer, 
Company  Secretary  and  Director  of  both  public  and  private  companies  in 
Australia and Hong Kong. 
Previous  roles  included  Chief  Financial  Officer/GM  Finance  of  Jardine  Lloyd 
Thompson, Colliers International Limited and Franklins Limited. 
21
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITY 
DIRECTORS REPORT 
GUY ROBERTSON 
(CONTINUED) 
Mr  Robertson  has  over  5  years’  experience  in  ASX  listed  mineral  exploration 
companies  and  is  currently  a  director  of  Artemis  Resources  Limited  and  was 
previously a Director of Hastings Rare Metals Limited.  
Appointed 17 September 2012. 
Other current public company directorships:  
•  Artemis Resources Limited 
Former directorships in the last 3 years:  
•  Hastings Rare Metals Limited 
Former Directors 
ANTHONY HO 
GRORGE FRANGESKIDES 
Appointed 12 October 2011, resigned 13 August 2013. 
Appointed 12 October 2012, resigned 27 December 2013 
Directors  have  been  in  office  since  the  start  of  the  financial  period  to  the  date  of  this  report  unless 
otherwise stated. 
Secretary 
SUE-ANN HIGGINS 
(Company Secretary) 
BA LLB Hons ACIS GAICD 
Ms  Higgins  is  an experienced company executive who has worked for over 
25  years  in  the  mining  industry  including  in  senior  legal  and  commercial 
roles with ARCO Coal Australia Inc, WMC Resources Ltd, Oxiana Limited and 
Citadel  Resource  Group  Limited.    Ms  Higgins  has  extensive  experience  in 
governance  and  compliance,  mergers  and  acquisitions,  equity  capital 
markets and mineral exploration, development and operations. 
Appointed 21 August 2013 
Interest in the shares and options of the Company 
As at the date of this report, the interests of the directors in the shares and options of Metal Bank Limited were: 
Inés Scotland 
Anthony Schreck 
Guy Robertson 
 Ordinary 
Shares 
17,500,000 
10,952,381 
- 
Options  
3,000,000 
 9,000,000 
- 
SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN STATE OF AFFAIRS 
Other than as outlined in the Chairman’s report, there were no significant changes in the state of affairs of the 
Company during the year. 
PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES 
The  principal  activity  of  the  Company  during  the  financial  year  was  mineral  exploration.    There  have  been  no 
significant changes in the nature of the Company’s principal activities during the financial year. 
SIGNIFICANT AFTER BALANCE SHEET DATE EVENTS 
There  are  no  matters  or  circumstances  that  have  arisen  since  the  end  of  the  financial  period  that  have 
significantly  affected  or  may  significantly  affect  the  operations  of  the  consolidated  entity,  the  results  of  those 
operations, or the state of affairs of the consolidated entity in future financial years.  
22
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITY 
DIRECTORS REPORT 
LIKELY FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS AND EXPECTED RESULTS 
The primary objective of Metal Bank is to explore its current tenements in Australia and the Company continues 
to look to invest in other mineral resource projects In Australia and globally as part of its growth strategy. 
The material business risks faced by the Company that are likely to have an effect on the financial prospects of 
the Company, and how the Company manages these risks, are: 
•  Future Capital Needs – the Company does not currently generate cash from its operations. The Company will 
require  further  funding  in  order  to  meet  its  corporate  expenses,  continue  its  exploration  activities  and 
complete studies necessary to assess the economic viability of its projects. 
•  Exploration and Developments Risks – the Company may fail to discover mineral deposits on its projects and 
once  determined  there  is  a  risk  that  the  Company’s  mineral  deposits  may  not  be  economically  viable.  The 
Company  employs  geologists  and  other  technical  specialists,  and  engages  external  consultants  where 
appropriate to address this risk. 
•  Commodity  Price  Risk  –  as  a  Company  which  is  focused  on  the  exploration  of  gold  and  base  and  precious 
metals, it is exposed to movements in the price of these commodities. The Company monitors historical and 
forecast price information from a range of sources in order to inform its planning and decision making.   
PERFORMANCE IN RELATION TO ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION 
The  consolidated  entity  will  comply  with  its  obligations  in  relation  to  environmental  regulation  on  its  Western 
Australian  and  Queensland  projects  and  when  it  undertakes  exploration  in  the  future.  The  Directors  are  not 
aware of any breaches of any environmental regulations during the period covered by this report. 
OPERATING RESULTS AND FINANCIAL REVIEW 
The  loss  of  the  consolidated  entity  after  providing  for  income  tax  amounted  to  $1,095,726  (2013:  loss  of 
$881,641). The result for the year was impacted by the following: 
The Group’s operating income increased to $49,156 (2013-$19,857) primarily the result of increased interest 
income given greater funds on hand. 
Expenses increased to $1,144,882 (2013-$901,498). Current year expenses were impacted with share based 
payments of $494,868 granted to consultants for their work in connection with the acquisition of Roar Resources 
Pty Ltd and the capital raising.   
Exploration costs increased to $3,425,211 (2013- $399,462) reflecting the acquisition of Roar Resources Pty Ltd 
$2,229,981 and subsequent exploration costs incurred on the Triumph and Eidsvold projects of $755,230. 
Net assets increased to $4,056,909 (2013-$514,878) reflecting the acquisition of Roar Resources Pty Ltd for shares 
in the amount of $2,138,889, a capital raise of $1,750,000 in cash, the settlement of debt for shares in the 
amount of $250,000, the settlement of consulting fees for shares in the amount of $300,000, and offset by the 
trading loss for the year. 
DIVIDENDS PAID OR RECOMMENDED 
The directors do not recommend the payment of a dividend and no amount has been paid or declared by way of 
a dividend to the date of this report. 
23
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITY 
DIRECTORS REPORT 
REMUNERATION REPORT 
Remuneration Policy 
The Board determines, on a case by case basis, the terms and conditions of employment of company executives 
and  consultants,  including  remuneration.    Remuneration  for  senior  executives  is  determined  and  reviewed  by 
reference to the Company’s performance, the individual’s performance, as well as comparable information from 
listed companies in similar industries to ensure base remuneration is set to reflect the market for a comparable 
role.   
The Board’s policy for determining the nature and amount of remuneration for Board members is as follows: 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
the terms and conditions  for the executive directors and other senior staff members, are developed by the 
Chair  and Company Secretary and approved by the Board; 
in  determining  competitive  remuneration  rates,  the  Board  may  seek  independent  advice  on  local  and 
international trends among comparative companies and industry generally. It examines terms and conditions 
for  employee  incentive  schemes,  benefit  plans  and  share  plans.  Independent  advice  may  be  obtained  to 
confirm  that  executive  remuneration  is  in  line  with  market  practice  and  is  reasonable  in  the  context  of 
Australian executive reward practices;  
the  Company  is  a  mineral  exploration  company,  and  therefore  speculative  in  terms  of  performance.  The 
Company does not generate cash from its operations and in order to preserve cash for exploration activities, 
may  pay  a  base  remuneration  less  than  market  rates  to  its  directors  and  senior  executives  with  salaries 
supplemented  by  options  and  performance  incentives  to  ensure  attraction  and  retention  of  talented 
directors and executives.  
all  remuneration  paid  to directors is valued at the cost to the Company and expensed. Where appropriate, 
shares  given  to  directors  and  executives  are  valued  as  the  difference  between  the  market  price  of  those 
shares  and  the  amount  paid  by  the  director  or  executive.  Options  are  valued  using  the  Black-Scholes 
methodology. Given the early stages in the Company’s development no options or long term incentives have 
been issued and no key performance indicators have yet been developed for executives. 
the  Board  policy  is  to  remunerate  non-executive  directors  at  market  rates  for  comparable  companies  for 
time,  commitment  and  responsibilities.  The  Chair  in  consultation  with  independent  advisors  determines 
payments to the non-executive directors and reviews their remuneration annually, based on market practice, 
duties and accountability.   
DIRECTORS' AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS’ EMOLUMENTS 
(a) Details of Directors and Key Management Personnel  
(i) 
Current Directors 
Inés Scotland – Non-Executive Chair (appointed 13 August 2013) 
Anthony Schreck – Executive Director (appointed 29 November 2013) 
Guy Robertson – Executive Director (appointed 17 September 2012) 
Former Directors 
Anthony Ho – Non-Executive Chairman (resigned 13 August 2013) 
George Frangeskides – Executive Director (resigned 27 December 2013)  
(ii) 
(iii) 
Company Secretary 
Sue-Ann Higgins (appointed 21 August 2013) 
Key Management Personnel 
Nil 
Other  than  the  directors  and  the  company  secretary,  the  Company  had no Key Management Personnel for the 
financial year ended 30 June 2014. 
Directors’  remuneration  and  other  terms  of  employment  are  reviewed  annually  by  the  Board  having  regard  to 
performance against goals set at the start of the year, relative comparative information and independent expert 
advice. 
24
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITY 
DIRECTORS REPORT 
Except as detailed in Notes (a) – (c) to the Remuneration Report, no director or officer has received or become 
entitled to receive, during or since the financial year, a benefit because of a contract made by the Company or a 
related body corporate with a director, a firm of which a director is a member or an entity in which a director has 
a  substantial  financial  interest.  This  statement  excludes  a  benefit  included  in  the  aggregate  amount  of 
emoluments  received  or  due  and  receivable  by  directors  and  shown  in  Notes  (a)  –  (c)  to  the  Remuneration 
Report, prepared in accordance with the Corporations Regulations, or the fixed salary of a full time employee of 
the Company. 
(b) Remuneration of Directors and Key Management Personnel 
Remuneration Policy 
The Board of Directors is responsible for determining and reviewing compensation arrangements. The Board will 
assess  the  appropriateness  of  the  nature  and  amount  of  emoluments  of  such  officers  on  a  periodic  basis  by 
reference  to  relevant  employment  market  conditions  with  the  overall  objective  of  ensuring  maximum 
stakeholder benefit from the retention of a high quality Board and executive team. Remuneration of Directors of 
the Group is set out below. 
Given the early stages in the Company’s development no performance remuneration has been granted. 
Parent & Group Key Management Personnel 
2014 
Base 
Salary 
and Fees 
40,566 
87,500 
60,828 
59,908 
19,160 
- 
4,731 
- 
272,693 
I.  Scotland 
A. Schreck 
G. Robertson 
s. Higgins 
G. Frangeskides 
V. Fayad 
A. Ho 
M. Sutherland 
Totals 
Share 
Based 
Payments 
Super-
annuation 
Total 
2013 
Base 
Salary 
and Fees 
Share 
Based 
Payments 
Super-
annuation 
Total 
- 
82,512 
           - 
          - 
- 
- 
- 
  3,752 
  8,094 
  44,318 
178,106 
          - 
          - 
           - 
     60,828 
    48,333 
          - 
     59,908 
          - 
- 
- 
- 
   19,160 
       24,243 
- 
       4,731 
- 
367,051 
    6,000 
 40,000 
     4,167 
 122,743 
          - 
           - 
           - 
           - 
- 
- 
20,000 
- 
20,000 
          - 
          - 
          - 
          - 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
       - 
       - 
  48,333 
      - 
24,243 
6,000 
60,000 
4,167 
142,743 
- 
82,512 
- 
11,846 
There  are  no  other  employment  benefits,  either  short  term,  post-employment  or  long  term,  non-monetary  or 
otherwise other than those outlined above. 
 (c) Employee Related Share-based compensation   
To  ensure  that  the  Company  has  appropriate  mechanisms  to  continue  to  attract  and  retain  the  services  of 
Directors  and  Employees  of  a  high  calibre,  the  Company  has  a  policy  of  issuing  options  that  are  exercisable  in 
future at a certain fixed price. 
No options were issued to employees during the year.  
 OPTIONS ISSUED AS PART OF REMUNERATION 
Nine million options (with an exercise price of 3 cents and expiring 30 November 2018) were issued to Anthony 
Schreck  upon  his  appointment  as  an  Executive  Director  and  the  issue  of  such  options  were  approved  by 
Shareholders at the 2013 Annual General Meeting. 
No other options have been issued to directors and executives as part of their remuneration for the year ended 
30 June 2014.  
25
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITY 
DIRECTORS REPORT 
MEETINGS OF DIRECTORS 
The  number  of  directors'  meetings  (including  committees)  held  during  the  financial  period  each  director  held 
office during the financial period and the number of meetings attended by each director are: 
Director 
I. Scotland 
A. Schreck 
G. Robertson 
A. Ho 
G. Frangeskides 
Directors Meetings 
Audit Committee Meetings 
Meetings Attended 
Number Eligible to 
Attend 
Meetings 
Attended 
Number Eligible to 
Attend 
4 
4 
5 
1 
2 
4 
4 
5 
1 
2 
2 
1 
- 
- 
1 
2 
1 
- 
- 
1 
In addition to the board meetings there was one circular resolution by the board. 
INDEMNIFYING OFFICERS  
In accordance with the constitution, except as may be prohibited by the Corporations Act 2001, every officer or 
agent of the Company shall be indemnified out of the property of the Company against any liability incurred by 
him or her in his or her capacity as officer or agent of the Company or any related corporation in respect of any 
act or omission whatsoever and howsoever occurring or in defending any proceedings, whether civil or criminal. 
The  Company  paid  insurance premiums of $11,585 in August 2014 in respect of directors’ and officers’ liability. 
The insurance premiums relate to: 
• 
• 
costs and expenses incurred by the relevant officers in defending legal proceedings, whether civil or criminal 
and whatever their outcome; 
other  liabilities  that  may  arise from their position, with the exception of conduct involving wilful breach of 
duty or improper use of information to gain a personal advantage. 
PROCEEDINGS ON BEHALF OF COMPANY 
No  person  has  applied  for  leave  of  court  to  bring  proceedings  on  behalf  of  the  Company  or  intervene  in  any 
proceeding to which the Company is a party for the purpose of taking responsibility on behalf of the Company for 
all or any part of those proceedings. The Company was not a party to any such proceedings during the year. 
AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION 
The  lead  auditor’s  independence  declaration  under  Section  307C  in  relation  to  auditor’s  independence  for  the 
year ended 30 June 2014 has been received and can be found on the following page. 
NON-AUDIT SERVICES 
The  Board  of  Directors  advises  that  no  non-audit  services  were provided by the Company’s auditors during the 
year.   
This report is made in accordance with a resolution of the directors. 
Guy Robertson 
Director 
Sydney, 26 September 2014 
26
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RSM Bird Cameron Partners 
Level 12, 60 Castlereagh Street Sydney NSW 2000 
GPO Box 5138 Sydney NSW 2001 
T +61 2 8226 4500    F +61 2 8226 4501 
AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION 
As  lead  auditor  for  the  audit  of  the  financial  report  of  Metal  Bank  Limited  for  the  year  ended  30  June  2014,  I 
declare that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, there have been no contraventions of: 
(i) 
(ii) 
the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 in relation to the audit; and 
any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit. 
RSM BIRD CAMERON PARTNERS 
C J HUME 
Partner 
Sydney, NSW 
Dated:  26 September 2014 
Liability limited by a 
scheme approved  
under Professional 
Standards Legislation 
Major Offices in: 
Perth, Sydney,  
Melbourne, Adelaide,  
Canberra and Brisbane 
ABN 36 965 185 036 
RSM Bird Cameron Partners is a member of the RSM network.  Each member 
of the RSM network is an independent accounting and advisory firm which 
practises in its own right.  The RSM network is not itself a separate legal entity 
in any jurisdiction. 
27 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITY  
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
Revenue 
Administration expenses 
Personnel costs 
Compliance and regulatory expenses 
Legal fees 
Occupancy costs 
Marketing 
Directors fees 
Management and consulting fees 
Travel expenses 
Exploration expenditure written off 
Provision for diminution of investment 
Depreciation 
Share based payments 
(LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAX 
Income tax expense  
(LOSS) FOR THE YEAR 
Note 
          2 
2014 
$ 
49,156 
(37,693) 
- 
(74,904) 
(31,559) 
(781) 
(1,608) 
(140,902) 
(255,203) 
(10,097) 
(65,787) 
(31,250) 
(230) 
(494,868) 
2013 
$ 
19,857 
(47,024) 
(9,508) 
(47,174) 
(69,105) 
(2,633) 
(18,881) 
(97,404) 
(371,582) 
(10,707) 
(189,980) 
(17,500) 
- 
(20,000) 
3 
4 
(1,095,726) 
(881,641) 
- 
- 
(1,095,726) 
(881,641) 
(LOSS) ATTRIBUTABLE TO MEMBERS OF 
METAL BANK LIMITED 
(1,095,726) 
(881,641) 
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME 
- 
- 
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS) 
(1,095,726) 
(881,641) 
Loss for the year is attributable to: 
Owners of Metal Bank Limited 
Non-controlling interest 
Total Comprehensive income for the year is 
attributable to: 
Owners of Metal Bank Limited 
Non-controlling interest 
Earnings per share  
Basic and diluted loss per share  
(cents per share) 
(1,095,726) 
- 
(1,095,726) 
(881,641) 
- 
(881,641) 
(1,095,726) 
- 
(1,095,726) 
(881,641) 
- 
(881,641) 
20 
(0.51) 
    (1.48) 
The Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income are to be read in conjunction with 
the attached notes 
28
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITY 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION 
AS AT 30 JUNE 2014 
CURRENT ASSETS 
Cash and cash equivalents 
Trade and other receivables 
Financial assets 
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 
NON-CURRENT ASSETS 
Plant and equipment 
Exploration and evaluation expenditure 
TOTAL NON-CURRENT ASSETS 
TOTAL ASSETS 
CURRENT LIABILITIES 
Trade and other payables 
Liability for deferred consideration 
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 
TOTAL LIABILITIES 
NET ASSETS 
EQUITY  
Issued Capital 
Reserves 
Accumulated losses 
Non controlling interest 
TOTAL EQUITY 
Note 
2014 
$ 
2013 
$ 
5 
6 
7 
8 
10 
11 
12 
     13 
     14 
               837,459 
69,750 
1,250 
908,459 
               510,254 
11,324 
32,500 
554,078 
2,070 
3,425,211 
3,427,281 
- 
399,462 
399,462 
4,335,740 
953,540 
278,831 
- 
278,831 
188,662 
250,000 
438,662 
278,831 
438,662 
4,056,909 
514,878 
9,817,912 
494,885 
(6,255,888) 
4,056,909 
- 
5,612,303 
250,973 
(5,348,398) 
514,878 
- 
4,056,909 
514,878 
The Consolidated Statement of Financial Position are to be read in conjunction with the attached notes. 
29
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
      
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITY 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
Issued  
Capital 
$ 
Reserves 
Accumulated 
Losses 
$ 
Non-
controlling 
interest 
Balance as at 1 July 2013 
Loss for the year 
Other comprehensive 
income for the year 
Total comprehensive 
income for the year 
Transfer to share based 
payments reserve 
Transfer from share based 
payments reserve 
Issue of share capital 
Cost of share capital issued 
Balance as at 30 June 
2014 
Balance as at 1 July 2012 
Loss for the year 
Other comprehensive 
income for the year 
Total comprehensive 
income for the year 
Transfer from asset 
revaluation reserve 
Issue of share capital 
Cost of share capital issued 
Balance as at 30 June 
2013 
5,612,303 
250,973 
- 
- 
- 
- 
4,438,889 
(233,280) 
9,817,912 
- 
- 
432,148 
(188,236) 
- 
- 
494,885 
(5,348,398) 
(1,095,726) 
- 
(1,095,726) 
- 
188,236 
- 
- 
(6,255,888) 
5,022,303 
- 
253,473 
- 
(4,466,757) 
(881,641) 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
(881,641) 
- 
590,000 
- 
(2,500) 
- 
- 
250,973 
- 
- 
- 
5,612,303 
(5,348,398) 
Total 
$ 
514,878 
(1,095,726) 
- 
(1,095,726) 
432,148 
- 
4,438,889 
(233,280) 
4,056,909 
809,019 
(881,641) 
- 
(881,641) 
(2,500) 
590,000 
- 
514,878 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
The Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity are to be read in conjunction with the attached notes.
30
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITY 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
22 
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES 
Payments to suppliers and employees 
Payment for exploration and evaluation 
Interest received 
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES 
Payments for fixed assets 
Loan repaid by unrelated entity 
Cash on acquisition of subsidiary 
NET CASH PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES 
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES 
Proceeds from issue of shares and options 
Costs of issue of shares 
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES 
NET INCREASE/(DECREASE) IN CASH HELD 
Cash at the beginning of the financial year 
CASH AT THE END OF THE FINANCIAL YEAR 
                        2014 
                           $ 
                     2013 
                           $ 
(518,566) 
(980,438) 
46,720 
(1,452,284) 
(2,300) 
- 
31,789 
29,489 
1,750,000 
- 
1,750,000 
327,205 
510,254 
837,459 
(999,490) 
(65,484) 
25,142 
(1,039,832) 
- 
192,097 
- 
192,097 
240,000 
                   - 
240,000 
(607,735) 
1,117,989 
510,254 
The Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows are to be read in conjunction with the attached notes. 
31
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
This  financial  report  includes  the  consolidated  financial  statements and notes of Metal Bank Limited and its 
controlled  entities  (Consolidated  Group  or  Group),  and  a  separate  note  on  the  accounts  of  Metal  Bank 
Limited as the parent entity (‘Parent’). 
1.  STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES 
BASIS OF PREPARATION 
The  financial  report  is  a  general  purpose  financial  report  that  has  been  prepared  in  accordance  with 
Australian Accounting Standards, Australian Accounting Interpretations, other authoritative pronouncements 
of the Australian Accounting Standards Board and the Corporations Act 2001. 
Australian  Accounting  Standards  set  out  accounting  policies  that  the  AASB  has  concluded  would  result  in  a 
financial  report  containing  relevant  and  reliable  information  about  transactions,  events  and  conditions.  
Compliance  with  Australian  Accounting  Standards  ensures  that  the  financial  statements  and  notes  also 
comply  with  International  Financial  Reporting  Standards.    Material  accounting  policies  adopted  in  the 
preparation of this financial report are presented below and have been consistently applied unless otherwise 
stated. 
This financial report is presented in Australian Dollars. 
The financial report has been prepared on an accruals basis and is based on historical costs, modified, where 
applicable,  by  the  measurement  at  fair  value  of  selected  non-current  assets,  financial  assets  and  financial 
liabilities. 
The financial report covers the Group of Metal Bank Limited and controlled entities.  Metal Bank Limited is a 
public listed company, incorporated and domiciled in Australia. 
a. 
Principles of Consolidation 
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the assets, liabilities and results of entities controlled 
by  Metal  Bank  Limited  at  the  end  of  the  reporting  period.  A  controlled  entity  is any entity over which 
Metal Bank Limited has the ability and right to govern the financial and operating policies so as to obtain 
benefits from the entity’s activities. 
Where controlled entities have entered or left the Group during the year, the financial performance of 
those entities is included only for the period of the year that they were controlled.  A list of controlled 
entities is contained in Note 9 to the financial statements. 
In  preparing  the  consolidated  financial  statements,  all  inter-group  balances  and  transactions  between 
entities in the consolidated group have been eliminated in full on consolidation.  
Non-controlling  interests,  being  the  equity  in  a  subsidiary  not  attributable,  directly  or  indirectly,  to  a 
parent,  are  reported  separately  within  the  equity  section  of  the  consolidated  statement  of  financial 
position  and  statement  of  comprehensive  income.    The  non-controlling  interests  in  the  net  assets 
comprise  their  interests  at  the  date  of  the  original business combination and their share of changes in 
equity since that date. 
Business Combinations 
Business combinations occur where an acquirer obtains control over one or more businesses. 
A business combination is accounted for by applying the acquisition method, unless it is a combination 
involving entities or businesses under common control. The business combination will be accounted for 
from  the  date  that  control  is  attained,  whereby  the  fair  value  of  the  identifiable  assets  acquired  and 
liabilities (including contingent liabilities) assumed is recognised (subject to certain limited exemptions). 
When  measuring  the  consideration  transferred  in  the  business  combination,  any  asset  or  liability 
resulting  from  a  contingent  consideration  arrangement 
included.  Subsequent  to  initial 
recognition,  contingent  consideration  classified  as  equity  is  not  remeasured  and  its  subsequent 
settlement  is  accounted  for  within  equity.  Contingent  consideration  classified  as  an  asset  or  liability  is 
remeasured  each  reporting  period  to  fair  value,  recognising  any  change  to  fair  value  in  profit  or  loss, 
unless the change in value can be identified as existing at acquisition date. 
is  also 
All transaction costs incurred in relation to the business combination are expensed to the statement of 
comprehensive income. 
32
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
The acquisition of a business may result in the recognition of goodwill or a gain from a bargain purchase. 
b.  Going Concern 
The financial statements have been prepared on the going concern basis, which contemplates continuity 
of normal business activities and the realisation of assets and liabilities in the normal course of business. 
As disclosed in the financial statements, the company and consolidated entity recorded operating losses 
of $1,095,726 and the consolidated entity had net cash outflows from operating activities of $1,452,284 
for the year ended 30 June 2014. The company will need to raise additional capital in order to meet its 
scheduled exploration expenditure requirements. 
These  factors  indicate  significant  uncertainty  as  to  whether  company  and  consolidated  entity  will 
continue  as  going  concerns  and  therefore  whether  they  will  realise  their  assets  and  extinguish  their 
liabilities in the normal course of business and at the amounts stated in the financial report. 
The  Directors  believe  that  the  company  and  consolidated  entities  will  be  able  to  continue  as  going 
concerns and that it is appropriate to adopt that basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial 
report after consideration of the following factors: 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
The consolidated entity had net current assets of $629,628 and net assets of $4,056,909 as at 30 June 
2014; 
The cash on hand as at the date is $837,459;  
The  ability  of  the  Company  to  raise  further  capital  to  enable  the  Company  to  meet  scheduled 
exploration  expenditure  requirements.  The  company  intends  to  raise  in  excess  of  $500,000  within 
the next 12 months;  
The company has successfully raised capital of $1,750,000 during the year; and 
The  directors  have  assessed  and  satisfied  themselves that the company will have adequate funding 
over the next 12 months to meet its obligations as and when these fall due.  
Accordingly, the Directors believe that the company and consolidated entity will be able to continue as 
going  concerns  and  that  it  is  appropriate  to  adopt  the  going  concern  basis  in  the  preparation  of  the 
financial report. 
The  financial  report  does  not  include  any  adjustments  relating  to  the  amounts  or  classification  of 
recorded  assets  or  liabilities  that  might  be  necessary  if  the  company  and  consolidated  entity  do  not 
continue as going concerns. 
c.  Adoption of New and Revised Accounting Standards 
Changes in accounting policies on initial application of Accounting Standards 
In  the  year  ended  30  June  2014,  the  Group  has  reviewed  all  of  the  new  and  revised  Standards  and 
Interpretations issued by the AASB that are relevant to its operations and effective for the current annual 
reporting period.   
It  has  been  determined  by  the  Group  that  there  is  no  impact,  material  or  otherwise,  of  the  new  and 
revised  Standards  and  Interpretations  on  its  business  and,  therefore,  no  change  is  necessary  to  Group 
accounting policies. 
The Group has also reviewed all new Standards and Interpretations that have been issued but are not yet 
effective for the year ended 30 June 2014. As a result of this review the Directors have determined that 
there  is  no  impact,  material  or  otherwise,  of  the  new  and  revised  Standards  and  Interpretations  on  its 
business and, therefore, no change necessary to Group accounting policies. 
The following Australian Accounting Standards have been issued or amended and are applicable to the 
Company but are not yet effective.  
33
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
The  Group  does  not  anticipate  the  early  adoption  of  any  of  the  following  Australian  Accounting 
Standards: 
Application 
date 
(financial 
years 
beginning) 
1 January 
2015 
(Changed to 1 
January 2017 
by AASB 
2013-9C) 
1 January 
2015 
Expected 
Impact 
Unlikely to have 
significant 
impact 
Unlikely to have 
significant 
impact 
1 January 
2015 
Unlikely to have 
significant 
impact 
1 January 
2014  
Unlikely to have 
significant 
impact 
1 January 
2014 
Unlikely to be 
      significant 
1 January 
2014 
Unlikely to be 
      significant 
1 January 
2014 
Unlikely to be 
      significant 
Reference 
Title 
Summary 
AASB 9  
Financial 
Instruments  
2009-11 
2010-7 
Amendments to 
Australian 
Accounting 
Standards arising 
from AASB 9 
Amendments to 
Australian 
Accounting 
Standards arising 
from AASB 9 
(December 2010)  
AASB 10 
(Not-for-Profits 
Only) 
Consolidated 
Financial 
Statements 
2012-3 
2013-3 
2013-9B 
Amendments to 
Australian 
Accounting 
Standards – 
Offsetting Financial 
Assets and 
Financial Liabilities 
Amendments to 
AASB 136 –
Recoverable 
Amount 
Disclosures for 
Non-Financial 
Assets 
Amendments to 
Australian 
Accounting 
Standards – 
Conceptual 
Framework, 
Materiality and 
Financial 
Instruments 
Replaces the requirements of AASB 
139 for the classification and 
measurement of financial assets. 
This is the result of the first part of 
Phase 1 of the IASB’s project to 
replace IAS 39. 
Amends AASB 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 101, 
102, 108, 112, 118, 121, 127, 128, 
131, 132, 136, 139, 1023 and 1038 
and Interpretations 10 and 12 as a 
result of the issuance of AASB 9.  
Amends AASB 1, 3, 4, 5, 7, 101, 
102, 108, 112, 118, 120, 121, 127, 
128, 131, 132, 136, 137, 139, 1023 & 
1038 and Interpretations 2, 5, 10, 12, 
19 & 127 for amendments to AASB 9 
in December 2010 
Replaces the requirements of AASB 
127 and Interpretation 112 pertaining 
to the principles to be applied in the 
preparation and presentation of 
consolidated financial statements. 
This Standard adds application 
guidance to AASB 132 to address 
inconsistencies identified in applying 
some of the offsetting criteria of 
AASB 132. 
This Standard amends the disclosure 
requirements in  
AASB 136 to include additional 
disclosures about the fair value 
measurement and discount rates 
when the recoverable amount of 
impaired assets is based on fair 
value less costs of disposal.  
Part B of 2013-9 makes 
amendments to particular Australian 
Accounting Standards to delete 
references to AASB 1031, and 
makes various editorial corrections 
to Australian Accounting Standards. 
34
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
Part A of 2014-1 amends various 
standards as a result of the annual 
improvements process 
1 July 2014 
Unlikely to be 
      significant 
Unlikely to be 
      significant 
1 July 2014 
2014-1A 
2014-1B 
2014-1C 
2014-1D 
Amendments to 
Australian 
Accounting 
Standards 
Amendments to 
Australian 
Accounting 
Standards 
Amendments to 
Australian 
Accounting 
Standards 
Amendments to 
Australian 
Accounting 
Standards 
Part B of AASB 2014-1 makes 
amendments to AASB 119 Employee 
Benefits in relation to the 
requirements for contributions from 
employees or third parties that are 
linked to service. 
Part C of AASB 2014-1 makes 
amendments to particular Australian 
Accounting Standards to delete their 
references to AASB 1031. 
Part D of AASB 2014-1 makes 
amendments to AASB 1 First-time 
Adoption of Australian Accounting 
Standards, which arise from the 
issuance of AASB 14 Regulatory 
Deferral Accounts in June 2014. 
1 July 2014 
Unlikely to be 
      significant 
1 July 2014 
No Impact 
AASB 1031 
Materiality 
Re-issuance of AASB 1031 
1 January 
2014 
Unlikely to be 
      significant 
d. 
Income Taxes 
The  income  tax  expense  (revenue)  for  the  year  comprises  current  income  tax  expense  (income)  and 
deferred  tax  expense  (income).  Current  income  tax  expense  charged  to  the  profit  or  loss  is  the  tax 
payable  on  taxable  income  calculated  using  applicable  income  tax  rates  enacted,  or  substantially 
enacted,  as  at  reporting  date.    Current  tax  liabilities  (assets)  are  therefore  measured  at  the  amounts 
expected to be paid to (recovered from) the relevant taxation authority. 
Deferred  income  tax  expense  reflects  movements  in  deferred  tax  asset  and  deferred  tax  liability 
balances during the year as well unused tax losses. Current and deferred income tax expense (income) is 
charged or credited directly to equity instead of the profit or loss when the tax relates to items that are 
credited  or  charged  directly  to  equity.  Deferred  tax  assets  and  liabilities  are  ascertained  based  on 
temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts 
in the financial statements. Deferred tax assets also result where amounts have been fully expensed but 
future  tax  deductions  are  available.    No  deferred  income  tax  will  be  recognised  from  the  initial 
recognition  of  an  asset  or  liability,  excluding  a  business  combination,  where  there  is  no  effect  on 
accounting or taxable profit or loss. 
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply to the period 
when the asset is realised or the liability is settled, based on tax rates enacted or substantively enacted 
at  reporting  date.    Their  measurement  also  reflects  the  manner  in  which  management  expects  to 
recover  or  settle  the  carrying  amount  of  the  related  asset  or  liability.  Deferred  tax  assets  relating  to 
temporary  differences  and  unused  tax  losses  are  recognised  only  to  the  extent  that  it  is probable that 
future taxable profit will be available against which the benefits of the deferred tax asset can be utilised. 
Where  temporary  differences  exist  in  relation  to  investments  in  subsidiaries,  branches, associates, and 
joint ventures, deferred tax assets and liabilities are not recognised where the timing of the reversal of 
the  temporary  difference  can  be  controlled  and  it  is  not  probable  that  the  reversal  will  occur  in  the 
foreseeable future. 
Current  tax  assets  and  liabilities  are  offset  where  a  legally  enforceable  right  of  set-off  exists  and  it  is 
intended  that  net  settlement  or  simultaneous  realisation  and  settlement  of  the  respective  asset  and 
liability will occur.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset where a legally enforceable right of set-
off  exists,  the  deferred  tax  assets  and  liabilities  relate  to  income  taxes  levied  by  the  same  taxation 
authority  on  either  the  same  taxable  entity  or  different  taxable  entities  where  it  is  intended  that  net 
settlement  or  simultaneous  realisation and settlement of the respective asset and liability will occur in 
35
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
future  periods  in  which  significant  amounts  of  deferred  tax  assets  or  liabilities  are  expected  to  be 
recovered or settled. 
e. 
Property, plant and equipment 
Plant and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment 
losses.  
Depreciation is calculated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the assets as follows: 
Plant and equipment – over 5 years 
The  assets’  residual  values,  useful  lives  and  amortisation  methods  are  reviewed,  and  adjusted  if 
appropriate, at each financial year end. 
(i)  Impairment 
The  carrying  values  of  plant  and  equipment  are  reviewed  for  impairment  at  each  balance date, with 
recoverable  amount  being  estimated  when  events  or  changes  in  circumstances  indicate  that  the 
carrying value may be impaired. 
The recoverable amount of plant and equipment is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value 
in use. 
An  impairment exists when the carrying value of an asset exceeds its estimated recoverable amount. 
The asset is then written down to its recoverable amount. 
For  plant  and  equipment,  impairment  losses  are  recognised  in  the  statement  of  comprehensive 
income.  
An annual transfer from the asset revaluation reserve to retained earnings is made for the difference 
between  depreciation  based  on  the  re-valued  carrying amounts of the assets and depreciation based 
on  the  assets’  original  costs.  Additionally,  any  accumulated  depreciation  as  at  the  revaluation  date is 
eliminated  against  the  gross  carrying  amounts  of  the  assets  and  the net amounts are restated to the 
re-valued amounts of the assets. 
Upon  disposal,  any  revaluation  reserve  relating  to  the  particular  asset  being  sold  is  transferred  to 
retained earnings. 
(ii) Derecognition and disposal 
An  item  of  property,  plant  and  equipment  is  derecognised  upon  disposal  or  when  no  further  future 
economic  benefits  are  expected  from  its  use  or  disposal.  Any gain or loss arising on derecognition of 
the asset (calculated as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of 
the asset) is included in the statement of comprehensive income in the year the asset is derecognised. 
f. 
Exploration and Evaluation Costs 
Exploration,  evaluation  and  development  expenditure  incurred  is  accumulated  in  respect  of  each 
identifiable area of interest. These costs are only carried forward to the extent that they are expected to 
be recouped through the successful development of the area or where activities in the area have not yet 
reached  a  stage  that  permits  reasonable  assessment  of  the  existence  of  economically  recoverable 
reserves. Accumulated costs in relation to an abandoned area are written off in full against profit in the 
year in which the decision to abandon the area is made. 
When  production  commences,  the  accumulated  costs  for  the  relevant  area  of  interest  are  amortised 
over the life of the area according to the rate of depletion of the economically recoverable reserves. A 
regular review is undertaken of each area of interest to determine the appropriateness of continuing to 
carry forward costs in relation to that area of interest. Costs of site restoration are provided over the life 
of  the  facility  from  when  exploration  commences  and  are  included  in  the  costs  of  that  stage.  Site 
restoration  costs  include  the  dismantling  and  removal  of  mining  plant,  equipment  and  building 
structures,  waste  removal,  and  rehabilitation  of  the  site  in  accordance  with  clauses  of  the  mining 
36
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
permits.  Such  costs  have  been  determined  using  estimates  of  future  costs,  current  legal  requirements 
and technology on an undiscounted basis. 
Any  changes  in  the  estimates  for  the  costs  are  accounted  on  a  prospective  basis.  In  determining  the 
costs of site restoration, there is uncertainty regarding the nature and extent of the restoration due to 
community expectations and future legislation. Accordingly the costs have been determined on the basis 
that the restoration will be completed within one year of abandoning the site. 
g. 
Financial Instruments 
Recognition and initial measurement 
Financial  assets  and  financial  liabilities  are  recognised  when  the  entity  becomes  a  party  to  the 
contractual  provisions  to  the  instrument.  For  financial  assets,  this  is  equivalent  to  the  date  that  the 
company  commits  itself  to  either  the  purchase  or  sale  of  the  asset  (i.e.  trade  date  accounting  is 
adopted).  
Financial  instruments  are  initially  measured  at  fair  value  plus  transaction  costs,  except  where  the 
instrument  is  classified  “at  fair  value  through  profit  or  loss”,  in  which  case  transaction  costs  are 
expensed to profit or loss immediately. 
Classification and subsequent measurement 
Financial  instruments  are  subsequently  measured  at  fair  value,  amortised  cost  using  the  effective 
interest rate method, or cost. 
Amortised  cost  is  the  amount  at  which  the  financial  asset  or  financial  liability  is  measured  at  initial 
recognition  less  principal  repayments  and  any  reduction  for  impairment,  and  adjusted  for  any 
cumulative  recognized  of  the  difference  between  that  initial  amount  and  the  maturity  amount 
calculated using the effective interest method. 
Fair  value  is  determined  based  on  current  bid  prices  for  all  quoted  investments.  Valuation  techniques 
are  applied  to  determine  the  fair  value  for  all  unlisted  securities,  including  recent  arm’s  length 
transactions, reference to similar instruments and option pricing models. 
The  effective  interest  method  is  used  to  allocate  interest  income or interest expense over the relevant 
period and is equivalent to the rate that discounts estimated future cash payments or receipts (including 
fees, transaction costs and other premiums or discounts) through the expected life (or when this cannot 
be reliably predicted, the contractual term) of the financial instrument to the net carrying amount of the 
financial  asset  or  financial  liability.  Revisions  to  expected  future  net  cash  flows  will  necessitate  an 
adjustment to the carrying value with a consequential recognition of an income or expense item in profit 
or loss. 
The Group does not designate any interests in subsidiaries, associates or joint venture entities as being 
subject to the requirements of Accounting Standards specifically applicable to financial instruments. 
(ii) Financial assets at fair value through profit or loss 
Financial assets are classified at “fair value through profit or loss” when they are held for trading for the 
purpose  of  short-term  profit  taking,  derivatives  not  held  for  hedging  purposes,  or  when  they  are 
designated  as  such  to  avoid  an  accounting  mismatch  or  to  enable  performance  evaluation  where  a 
Group of financial assets is managed by key management personnel on a fair value basis in accordance 
with a documented risk management or investment strategy. Such assets are subsequently measured at 
fair value with changes in carrying value being included in profit or loss. 
(ii) Loans and receivables 
Loans and receivables are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are 
not quoted in an active market and are subsequently measured at amortised cost. 
37
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
Loans and receivables are included in current assets, where they are expected to mature within 12 
months after the end of the reporting period. 
(iii) Held-to-maturity investments 
Held-to-maturity  investments  are  included  in  non-current  assets  where  they  are  expected  to  mature 
within  12  months  after  the  end  of  the  reporting  period.  All other investments are classified as current 
assets. 
(iv) Available-for-sale financial assets 
Available-for-sale  financial  assets  are  non-derivative  financial  assets  that  are  either  not  suitable  to  be 
classified into other categories of financial assets due to their nature, or they are designated as such by 
management.  They  comprise  investments  in  the  equity  of other entities where there is neither a fixed 
maturity nor fixed or determinable payments. 
They  are  subsequently  measured  at  fair  value  with  changes  in  such  fair  value  (ie  gains  or  losses) 
recognized  in  other  comprehensive  income  (except  for  impairment  losses  and  foreign  exchange  gains 
and  losses). When the financial asset is recognised, the cumulative gain or loss pertaining to that asset 
previously recognised in other comprehensive income is reclassified into profit or loss. 
Available-for-sale financial assets are included in non-current assets where they are expected to be sold 
within 12 months after the end of the reporting period. All other financial assets are classified as current 
assets. 
(i)  Financial liabilities 
Non-derivative financial liabilities (excluding financial guarantees) are subsequently measured at 
amortised cost. 
Derivative instruments  
The Group designates certain derivatives as either: 
i.  hedges of the fair value of recognised assets or liabilities or a firm commitment (fair value hedge); or 
ii. hedges of highly probable forecast transactions (cash flow hedges). 
At the inception of the transaction the relationship between hedging instruments and hedged items, as 
well as the Group’s risk management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions, 
is documented. 
Assessments, both at hedge inception and on an ongoing basis, of whether the derivatives that are used 
in  hedging  transactions  have  been  and  will continue to be highly effective in offsetting changes in fair 
values or cash flows of hedged items, are also documented. 
      (i)  Fair value hedge 
Changes  in  the  fair  value  of  derivatives  that  are  designated  and  qualified  as  fair  value  hedges  are 
recorded in the statement of comprehensive income, together with any changes in the fair value of 
hedged assets or liabilities that are attributable to the hedged risk. 
(ii) Cash flow hedge 
The  effective  portion  of  changes  in  the  fair  value  of  derivatives  that  are  designated  and qualify as 
cash flow hedges is deferred to a hedge reserve in equity. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective 
portion is recognised immediately in the statement of comprehensive income. 
Amounts  accumulated 
comprehensive income in the periods when the hedged item will affect profit or loss. 
in  the  hedge  reserve 
in  equity  are  transferred  to  the  statement  of 
38
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
Impairment  
At  the  end  of  each  reporting  period,  the  Group  assesses  whether  there  is  objective  evidence  that  a 
financial  instrument  has  been  impaired.  In  the  case  of  available-for-sale  financial  instruments,  a 
prolonged decline in the value of the instrument is considered to determine whether an impairment has 
arisen.  Impairment  losses  are  recognised  in  profit  or  loss.  Also,  any  cumulative  decline  in  fair  value 
previously recognised in other comprehensive income is reclassified to profit or loss at this point. 
Financial guarantees 
Where  material,  financial  guarantees  issued  that  require  the  issuer  to  make  specified  payments  to 
reimburse the holder for a loss it incurs because a specified debtor fails to make payment when due are 
recognised as a financial liability at fair value on initial recognition.  
The  guarantee  is  subsequently  measured  at  the  higher  of  the  best  estimate  of  the  obligation  and  the 
amount  initially  recognised  less,  when  appropriate,  cumulative  amortisation  in  accordance  with 
AASB 118:  Revenue.    Where  the  entity  gives  guarantees  in  exchange  for  a  fee,  revenue  is  recognised 
under AASB 118. 
The  fair  value  of  financial  guarantee  contracts  has  been  assessed  using  a  probability-weighted 
discounted cash flow approach. The probability has been based on: 
(iii)  the likelihood of the guaranteed party defaulting in a year period; 
(iv)  the  proportion  of  the  exposure  that  is  not  expected  to  be  recovered  due    to  the  guaranteed 
party defaulting; and 
(v)  the maximum loss exposed if the guaranteed party were to default. 
Derecognition 
Financial assets are recognised where the contractual rights to receipt of cash flows expire or the asset 
is transferred to another party whereby the entity no longer has any significant continuing involvement 
in the risks and benefits associated with the asset. Financial liabilities are recognised where the related 
obligations  are  discharged,  cancelled  or  expired.  The  difference  between  the  carrying  value  of  the 
financial  liability  extinguished  or  transferred  to  another party and the fair value of consideration paid, 
including the transfer of non-cash assets or liabilities assumed, is recognised in profit or loss. 
h. 
Impairment of Assets 
At each reporting date, the Company reviews the carrying values of its tangible and intangible assets to 
determine  whether  there  is  any  indication  that  those  assets  have  been  impaired.  If  such  an  indication 
exists,  the  recoverable  amount  of  the  asset,  being  the  higher  of  the  asset’s  fair  value  less  costs  to  sell 
and value in use, is compared to the asset’s carrying value. Any excess of the asset’s carrying value over 
its  recoverable  amount  is  expensed  to  the  consolidated  statement  of  comprehensive  income. 
Impairment testing is performed annually for goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives.  
Where  it  is  not  possible  to  estimate  the  recoverable  amount  of  an  individual  asset,  the  Company 
estimates the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs.  In the case of 
available-for-sale financial instruments, a prolonged decline in the value of the instrument is considered 
to determine whether impairment has arisen. 
i. 
Cash and Cash Equivalents 
Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, deposits held at call with banks, other short-term highly 
liquid investments with original maturities of 3 months or less, and bank overdrafts. Bank overdrafts are 
shown within short-term borrowings in current liabilities on the statement of financial performance. 
j. 
Revenue Recognition 
39
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
Interest  revenue  is  recognised  using the effective interest method.  It includes the amortisation of any 
discount or premium. 
k.  Goods and Services Tax (GST) 
Revenues,  expenses  and  assets  are  recognised  net  of  the amount of GST, except where the amount of 
GST  incurred  is  not  recoverable  from  the  Australian  Tax  Office.  In  these  circumstances  the  GST  is 
recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part of an item of the expense. Receivables 
and payables in the statement of financial position are shown inclusive of GST. Cash flows are presented 
in the statement of cash flows on a gross basis, except for the GST component of investing and financing 
activities, which are disclosed as operating cash flows. 
l. 
Comparative Figures 
When required by Accounting Standards, comparative figures have been adjusted to conform to changes 
in presentation for the current financial year.  
m.  Significant judgements and key assumptions 
The  directors  evaluate  estimates  and  judgements  incorporated  into  the  financial  report  based  on 
historical knowledge and best available current information.  Estimates assume a reasonable expectation 
of  future  events  and  are  based  on  current  trends  and  economic  data,  obtained  both  externally  and 
within the Company. 
n.  Key judgements and estimates 
Key Judgment Exploration Expenditure  
The Company capitalises expenditure relating to exploration and evaluation where it is considered likely 
to  be  recoverable  or  where  the  activities  have  not  reached  a  stage  which  permits  a  reasonable 
assessment  of  the  existence  of  reserves.    While  there  are  certain  areas  of  interest  from  which  no 
reserves have been extracted, the directors are of the continued belief that such expenditure should not 
be  written  off  since  feasibility  studies  in  such  areas  have  not  yet  concluded.    Such  capitalised 
expenditure is carried at reporting date at $3,425,211. 
Key Judgment Environmental Issues 
Balances  disclosed  in  the  financial  statements  and  notes  thereto  are  not  adjusted  for  any  pending  or 
enacted environmental legislation, and the directors understanding thereof. At the current stage of the 
company’s  development  and  its  current  environmental  impact  the  directors  believe  such  treatment  is 
reasonable and appropriate. 
Key Estimate Taxation 
Balances disclosed in the financial statements and the notes thereto, relating to taxation, are based on 
the  best  estimates  of  directors.  These  estimates  take  into  account  both  the financial performance and 
position  of  the  company  as  they  pertain  to  current  income  taxation  legislation,  and  the  directors 
understanding  thereof.  No  adjustment  has  been  made  for  pending  or  future  taxation  legislation.  The 
current  income  tax  position  represents  that  directors’  best  estimate,  pending  an  assessment  by  the 
Australian Taxation Office. 
Key Estimates Share based payment transactions 
The  Company  measures  the  cost  of  equity-settled  transactions  by  reference  to  the  fair  value  of  the 
equity instruments at the date at which they are granted. The fair value is determined by reference to 
the market price. Refer note 25. 
2.  REVENUE AND OTHER INCOME 
2014 
2013 
40
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
Interest received 
Other income 
3.  LOSS FOR THE YEAR 
Loss for the year is after charging: 
Wages and salaries 
Superannuation 
Other employment related costs 
 Less capitalised exploration costs  
 Less transferred to Directors fees 
 Personnel costs 
4.  INCOME TAX EXPENSE 
$ 
46,731 
2,425 
49,156 
$ 
19,857 
                      - 
19,857 
2014 
$ 
170,866 
15,805 
6,601 
193,272 
(117,089) 
(76,183) 
- 
2013 
$ 
- 
- 
9,508 
9,508 
- 
- 
9,508 
(a)  No  income  tax  is  payable  by  the  parent  or  consolidated  entity  as  they  recorded  losses  for  income  tax 
purposes for the period. 
  (b) Reconciliation between income tax expense and prima facie tax on accounting profit (loss) 
Accounting profit (loss) 
Tax at 30% 
Tax effect of other (deductible)/non-deductible 
items 
Deferred tax asset not recognised 
Income tax expense 
  (c) Deferred tax assets 
Revenue tax losses 
Deferred tax assets not recognised 
Set off deferred tax liabilities 
Income tax expense 
  (d) Deferred tax liabilities 
Exploration expenditure 
Set off deferred tax assets 
  (e) Tax losses 
2014 
$ 
            (1,095,726) 
(328,718) 
           (106,172) 
2013 
$ 
             (881,641) 
 (264,492) 
6,000 
434,890 
- 
258,492 
- 
454,626 
(434,890) 
(19,736) 
- 
315,486 
(258,492) 
(56,994) 
- 
                  19,736 
(19,736) 
- 
                 56,994 
(56,994) 
- 
Unused  tax  losses  for  which  no  deferred  tax  asset 
has been recognised 
          5,174,384 
3,232,594   
41
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
Potential deferred tax assets attributable to tax losses and exploration expenditure carried forward have not 
been  brought  to  account  at  30  June  2014  because  the  directors  do  not  believe  it  is  appropriate  to  regard 
realisation of the deferred tax assets as probable at this point in time. These benefits will only be obtained if: 
- the Company derives future assessable income of a nature and of an amount sufficient to enable the benefit 
from the deductions for the loss and exploration expenditure to be realised; 
- the Company continues to comply with conditions for deductibility imposed by law; and 
-  no  changes in tax legislation adversely affect the company in realising the benefit from the deductions for 
the loss and exploration expenditure. 
The applicable tax rate is the national tax rate in Australia for companies, which is 30% at the reporting date. 
5.  CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS 
Cash and cash equivalents 
   837,459 
510,254 
               2014 
                      $ 
                   2013 
                          $ 
6.  TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES 
CURRENT 
Other receivables 
GST Receivable 
7.  FINANCIAL ASSETS 
CURRENT 
ASX Listed Shares 
Financial assets available for sale¹ 
          2014 
                 $ 
        2013 
              $ 
32,633 
37,117 
69,750 
593 
10,731 
11,324 
        2014 
              $ 
      2013 
             $ 
1,250 
1,250 
32,500 
32,500 
¹ 250,000 shares in Stratum Metals Limited at 0.5 cents per share as at 30 June 2014.  
8.  PLANT AND EQUIPMENT 
Office equipment 
At Cost 
Accumulated depreciation 
Office equipment 
Opening balance 
Purchases 
Depreciation 
           2014 
                  $ 
        2013 
               $ 
2,300 
(230) 
2,070 
- 
2,300 
(230) 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
42
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
Closing balance 
2,070 
- 
9.  CONTROLLED ENTITY 
Parent Entity: 
Metal Bank Limited 
Subsidiary: 
Roar Resources Pty Ltd 
Spinifex Ridge East Pty Limited 
Country of 
Incorporation 
Ownership % 
2014 
Ownership % 
2013 
Australia 
Australia 
Australia 
- 
100 
80 
- 
- 
80 
On 2 December 2013 the Company acquired 100% of Roar Resources Pty Limited. 
The purchase consideration was 106,944,444 shares in Metal Bank Limited. 
The assets and liabilities recognised as a result of the acquisition are as follows: 
Cash and cash equivalents 
Receivables 
Exploration costs 
Payables 
Consideration 
 Issue of 106,944,444 shares 
Cash payment of stamp duty 
30 June 2014 
$ 
31,789 
10,228 
2,229,981 
(2,162) 
2,269,836 
2,138,889 
130,947 
2,269,836 
10. EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION EXPENDITURE 
         2014 
                $ 
         2013 
                $ 
Exploration and evaluation expenditure 
3,425,211 
399,462 
43
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
Reconciliation of carrying amount 
Balance at beginning of financial year 
Project acquisition 
Expenditure in current year 
Exploration expenditure written off 
Balance at end of financial period 
399,462 
2,229,981 
861,555 
(65,787) 
3,425,211 
523,958 
- 
65,484 
(189,980) 
399,462 
11. TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES 
CURRENT 
Unsecured liabilities: 
Trade payables 
Sundry payables and accrued expenses 
12. LIABILITY FOR DEFERRED CONSIDERATION 
Liability for deferred consideration¹ 
         2014 
               $ 
        2013 
              $ 
203,085 
75,746 
278,831 
88,661 
100,001 
188,662 
         2014 
               $ 
- 
         2013 
                $ 
250,000 
¹ The liability for deferred consideration arose on the acquisition of Spinifex Ridge East Pty Limited in 2011, in which 
the Company has an 80% interest. The Company settled the liability during the year through the issue of 12 million 
shares.  
13. SHARE CAPITAL 
292,929,445 (2013 – 71,485,001) 
fully paid ordinary shares 
          2014 
                 $ 
         2013 
                $ 
9,817,912 
5,612,303 
Ordinary shares participate in dividends and the proceeds on winding up of the parent entity in proportion to 
the number of shares held.  At shareholders’ meetings each ordinary share is entitled to one vote when a poll 
is called, otherwise each shareholder has one vote on a show of hands. 
Reconciliation of movements in share capital during the year: 
Opening balance – start of 
reporting period 
Share Issue – 10 October 2012 
Share Issue – 31 October 2012 
Share Issue – 16 April 2013 
Share Issue – 14 August 2013 
Share Issue – 2 December 2013 
Share Issue – 2 December 2013* 
2014 
No. Shares 
2013 
No. Shares 
2014 
$ 
71,485,001 
- 
- 
- 
87,500,000 
15,000,000 
12,000,000 
52,485,001 
1,000,000 
6,000,000 
12,000,000 
- 
- 
- 
44
5,612,303 
1,750,000 
300,000 
250,000 
2013 
$ 
5,022,303 
50,000 
300,000 
240,000 
- 
- 
- 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
Share Issue – 2 December 2013** 
Cost of raising capital 
106,944,444 
- 
292,929,445 
- 
- 
71,485,001 
2,138,889 
(233,280) 
9,817,912 
- 
- 
5,612,303 
* On 29 November 2013 shareholders approved the issue of 12,000,000 shares in settlement of a $250,000 debt as per 
note 12. 
** Issued on acquisition of Roar Resources Pty Ltd. 
Capital Management 
The Company’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard its ability to continue as a going concern, 
so that it may continue to provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders. 
The Company’s capital includes ordinary share capital and financial liabilities, supported by financial assets. 
Due  to  the  nature  of  the  Company’s  activities,  being  mineral  exploration,  it  does  not  have  ready  access  to 
credit  facilities,  with  the  primary  source  of  funding  being  equity  raisings.  Accordingly,  the  objective  of  the 
Company’s  capital  risk  management  is  to  balance  the  current  working  capital  position  against  the 
requirements of the Company to meet exploration programmes and corporate overheads. This is achieved by 
maintaining  appropriate  liquidity  to  meet  anticipated  operating  requirements,  with  a  view  to  initiating 
appropriate capital raisings as required.  
Cash and cash equivalents 
Trade and other receivables  
Financial assets 
Trade and other payables 
Liability for deferred consideration 
Working capital position  
Share options 
Movements in share options 
At 1 July  
           2014 
          2013 
                $ 
                $ 
837,459 
510,254 
68,750 
1,250 
11,324 
32,500 
(278,831) 
(188,662) 
- 
    (250,000) 
628,628 
   115,416 
2014 
No. 
2013 
No. 
21,000,000 
21,000,000 
Company options issued during the year  - unlisted 
    55,000,000 
              - 
Options expired 30 June 2014 
At 30 June 
  (15,000,000) 
    - 
    61,000,000 
   21,000,000 
The Company has the following options outstanding as at 30 June 2014. 
Grant/Issue Date 
Expiry Date 
Exercise Price 
Number 
Listed/Unlisted 
21 February 2012 
15 August 2013 
2 December 2013 
30 November 2014 
31 March 2015 
30 November 2018 
10 cents 
3 cents 
3 cents 
  6,000,000 
40,000,000 
15,000,000 
Unlisted 
Unlisted 
Unlisted 
The  following  table  illustrates the number (No.) and weighted average exercise prices of and movements in 
share options issued during the year: 
45
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
Weighted 
average 
exercise price 
Weighted 
average 
exercise price 
Outstanding  at  the  beginning  of  the 
year 
Granted during the year 
Expired during the year 
Exercised during the year 
Outstanding at the end of the year 
Exercisable at the end of the year 
2014 
No. 
21,000,000 
55,000,000 
(15,000,000) 
- 
61,000,000 
61,000,000 
2014 
$ 
$0.17 
$0.03 
$0.20 
- 
2013 
No. 
21,000,000 
- 
- 
- 
$0.037 
 $0.037 
21,000,000 
21,000,000 
2013 
$ 
$0.17 
- 
- 
- 
$0.17 
$0.17 
The share options outstanding at the end of the year had a weighted average exercise price of $0.037 (2013: $0.17 and 
weighted average remaining contractual life of 1.58 years (2013: 1.12 years). 
The following share-based payment arrangements are in place during the current and prior periods: 
Series 
Number 
Grant/Issue 
Date 
Expiry date 
Exercise 
Price 
Fair Value at Grant 
Date 
Series 1 
   6,000,000 
21/02/12 
30/11/14 
10 cents 
Series 2 
Series 3 
Series 4 
25,000,000 
15,000,000 
15,000,000 
15/8/13 
12/9/13 
2/12/13 
  31/3/15 
  31/3/15 
30/11/18 
3 cents 
3 cents 
3 cents 
  62,737 
214,324 
  80,304 
137,520 
Listed/ 
Unlisted 
Unlisted 
Unlisted 
Unlisted 
Unlisted 
Series 1 
Series 2 
Series 3 
Series 4 
   Expected volatility (%) 
   Risk-free interest free (%) 
Expected life of option (years) 
80% 
3.65% 
2.36 
78% 
3.31% 
1.62 
    Exercise price ($) 
10 cents 
3 cents 
   Grant date share price 
4 cents 
2.5 cents 
78% 
3.31% 
1.54 
3 cents 
2 cents 
78% 
3.31% 
6.0 
3 cents 
1.7 cents 
14. RESERVES 
Option issue reserve 
(a)  Movements in options issue reserve – nil 
Opening balance 
Transferred to options reserve 
Transfer from options reserve on options expiry 
2014 
$ 
2013 
$ 
   494,885 
     250,973 
250,973 
432,148 
   (188,236) 
250,973 
- 
494,885 
  250,973 
46
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
     
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
(b) Movements in unrealised gains reserve 
Opening balance 
Decrease in value of financial assets 
Closing balance 
2014 
$ 
- 
- 
- 
 2013 
$ 
       2,500 
         (2,500) 
               - 
15. FINANCIAL RISK MANAGEMENT 
The  group’s  principal  financial  instruments  comprise  mainly  of  deposits  with  banks  and  shares  in  listed 
companies  shown  as  financial  assets  at  fair value through profit and loss. The main purpose of the financial 
instruments is to earn the maximum amount of interest at a low risk to the group.  The group also has other 
financial instruments such as trade debtors and creditors which arise directly from its operations.  
The consolidated entity holds the following financial instruments at the end of the reporting period: 
Financial assets 
Cash and cash equivalents 
Trade and other receivables 
Financial assets at fair value 
through profit and loss 
Financial liabilities 
Trade and other payables 
Liability for deferred 
consideration 
2014 
$ 
2013 
$ 
837,459 
                          69,750 
510,254 
11,324 
                            1,250 
32,500 
554,078 
908,459 
278,831 
- 
188,662 
250,000 
278,831 
438,662 
The main risks arising from the Company’s financial instruments are market risk, credit risk and liquidity risk. 
The Board reviews and agrees policies for managing each of these risks and they are summarised below: 
a.  Market risk 
Cash flow and fair value interest rate risk 
The  group’s  main  interest  rate  risk  arises  from  cash  deposits  to  be  applied  to  exploration  and 
development  areas  of  interest.  It  is  the  group’s  policy  to  invest  cash  in  short  term  deposits  to 
minimise the group’s exposure to interest rate fluctuations. The group’s deposits were denominated 
in  Australian  dollars  throughout  the  year.  The  group  did  not  enter  into  any  interest  rate  swap 
contracts  
during  the  year  ended  30  June  2014.  Neither  the  group  nor  the  parent  has  any  short  or  long  term 
debt, and therefore this risk is minimal. 
b.  Credit Risk 
Credit  risk  refers  to  the risk that counterparty will default on its contractual obligations resulting in 
financial  loss  to  the  group.    The  group  has  adopted  the  policy  of  only  dealing  with  credit  worthy 
counterparties and obtaining sufficient collateral or other security where appropriate, as a means of 
47
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                         
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
mitigating  the  risk  of  financial  loss  from  defaults.  The  cash  transactions  of  the group are limited to 
high credit quality financial institutions. 
The group does not have any significant credit risk exposure to any single counterparty or any group 
of counterparties having similar characteristics.  The carrying amount of financial assets recorded in 
the financial statements, net of any provisions for losses, represents the group’s maximum exposure 
to credit risk. 
All cash holdings within the Group are currently held with AA rated financial institutions. 
c.  Liquidity Risk 
 The  group  manages  liquidity  risk  by  continuously  monitoring  forecast  and  actual  cash  flows  and 
matching  the  maturity  profiles  of  financial  assets  and  liabilities.  Surplus  funds  when  available  are 
generally only invested in high credit quality financial institutions in highly liquid markets. 
Financial Instrument composition and maturity analysis 
The  tables  below  reflect  the  undiscounted  contractual  settlement  terms  for  financial  instruments  of  a fixed 
period  of  maturity,  as  well  as  management’s  expectations  of  the  settlement  period  for  all  other  financial 
instruments. As such, the amounts may not reconcile to the statement of financial position. 
Consolidated Group 
Within 1 year 
1 to 5 years 
Over 5 years 
Total 
2014 
$ 
2013 
$ 
2014 
$ 
2013 
$ 
2014 
$ 
2013 
$ 
2014 
$ 
2013 
$ 
Financial liabilities - 
due for payment: 
Trade and other 
payables 
Liability for 
deferred 
consideration 
Total contractual 
outflows 
Financial assets – 
cash flows 
realisable 
Cash and cash 
equivalents 
Trade and other 
receivables 
Financial assets 
Total anticipated 
inflows 
Net inflow on 
financial 
instruments 
278,831 
188,662 
- 
250,000 
278,831 
438,662 
837,459 
510,254 
69,750 
1,250 
11,324 
32,500 
908,459 
554,078 
629,628 
115,416 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
278,831 
188,662 
- 
250,000 
278,831 
438,662 
837,459 
510,254 
69,750 
1,250 
11,324 
32,500 
908,459 
554,078 
- 
629,628 
115,416 
Cash flow sensitivity analysis for variable rate instruments 
A change of 100 basis points in interest rates at the reporting date would have increased/(decreased) equity 
and profit or loss by the amounts shown below. 
Change in profit 
Change in equity 
48
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
30 June 2014 
Cash and cash equivalents  
30 June 2013 
Cash and cash equivalents 
Carrying 
Value 
$ 
837,459 
100bp  
Increase 
$ 
8,374 
100bp 
decrease 
$ 
(8,374) 
100bp 
increase 
$ 
8,374 
100bp 
decrease 
$ 
(8,374) 
510,254 
5,103 
(5,103) 
5,103 
(5,103) 
Maturity of financial assets and liabilities 
The  note  below  summarises  the  maturity  of  the  group’s  financial  assets  and  liabilities  as  per  the  director’s 
expectations. The amounts disclosed are the contractual undiscounted cash flows. There are no derivatives. 
30 June 2014 
Trade and other receivables 
Trade and other payables 
Liability for deferred consideration 
30 June 2013 
Trade and other receivables 
Trade and other payables 
Liability for deferred consideration 
< 6 months 
$ 
         69,750 
278,831 
- 
          11,324 
188,662 
250,000 
6 – 12 
months 
$ 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
1- 5 years 
>5 years 
Total 
$ 
$ 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
$ 
         69,750 
278,831 
- 
          11,324 
188,662 
250,000 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
Fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities 
There is no difference between the fair values and the carrying amounts of the group’s financial instruments.  
The Group has no unrecognised financial instruments at balance date. 
Financial Instruments Measured at Fair Value 
The  financial  instruments  recognised  at  fair  value  in  the  statement of financial position have been analysed 
and  classified  using  a  fair  value  hierarchy  reflecting  the  significance  of  the  inputs  used  in  making  the 
measurements. The fair value hierarchy consists of the following levels: 
• 
• 
• 
quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1); 
inputs  other  than  quoted  prices  included  within  Level  1  that  are  observable  for  the  asset  or  liability, 
either directly (as prices) or indirectly (derived from prices) (Level 2); and 
 inputs  for  the  asset  or  liability  that  are  not  based  on  observable  market  data  (unobservable  inputs)      
(Level 3). 
Sensitivity analysis on changes in market rates 
A change of 20% in equity prices at the reporting date would increase/(decrease) equity and profit or loss as 
shown below: 
Carrying 
Value 
Change in profit 
20% 
increase 
20%  
decrease 
Change in equity 
20% 
20% 
decrease 
increase 
49
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 
$ 
30 June 2014 
    Financial assets available for sale 
        ASX listed investments 
30 June 2013 
    Financial assets available for sale 
        ASX listed investments 
1,250 
250 
(250) 
250 
(250) 
32,500 
6,500 
(6,500) 
6,500 
(6,500) 
16. COMMITMENTS 
The consolidated group currently has commitments for expenditure at 30 June 2014 on its Australian 
exploration tenements, up to the date of expiry, as follows: 
Not later than 12 months 
Between 12 months and 5 years 
Greater than 5 years 
2014 
$ 
411,667 
734,500 
- 
1,146,167 
2013 
$ 
160,000 
160,000 
- 
320,000 
The  group  has  a  further  commitment  to  pay a retainer fee under outsourced consultancy and management 
agreements for the provision of geological and service personnel. These agreements can be cancelled with six 
months notice. 
Not later than 12 months 
Between 12 months and 5 years 
Greater than 5 years 
2014 
$ 
54,000 
- 
- 
54,000 
2013 
$ 
108,000 
36,000 
- 
144,000 
17. CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND CONTINGENT ASSETS 
There are no contingent liabilities or assets in existence at balance sheet date. 
18. RELATED PARTY DISCLOSURES 
Refer to the Remuneration Report contained in the Directors Report for details of the remuneration paid or 
payable to each member of the Group’s key management personnel for the year ended 30 June 2014.  Other 
than  the  Directors  and  secretary,  the  Company  had  no  key  management  personnel  for  the  financial  period 
ended 30 June 2014. 
The total remuneration paid to key management personnel of the company and the group during the year are 
as follows: 
Short term employee benefits 
Superannuation 
Share based payments 
50
             2014 
                    $ 
272,693 
11,846 
82,512 
   2013 
  $ 
       122,743 
   20,000 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
367,051 
  142,743 
DIRECTORS' AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS’ EMOLUMENTS 
(a)  Details of Directors and Key Management Personnel 
(i)  Directors 
Inés Scotland (Non-Executive Chairman) (Appointed 13 August 2013) 
Anthony Schreck (Executive Director) (Appointed 29 November 2013) 
Guy Robertson (Executive Director) (Appointed 17 September 2102) 
(ii)  Company secretary 
Sue-Ann Higgins – Company Secretary (Appointed 21 August 2013) 
(iii)    Directors’ remuneration 
Directors’ remuneration and other terms of employment are reviewed annually by the Board having regard to 
performance  against  goals  set  at  the  start  of  the  year,  relative  comparative  information  and,  where 
applicable, independent expert advice. 
Except  as  detailed  in  Notes  (a)  –  (c)  to  the  Remuneration  Report  in  the  Director’s  Report,  no  director  has 
received  or  become entitled to receive, during or since the financial period, a benefit because of a contract 
made by the Company or a related body corporate with a director, a firm of which a director is a member or 
an entity in which a director has a substantial financial interest.  This statement excludes a benefit included in 
the aggregate amount of emoluments received or due and receivable by directors and shown in Notes (a) – 
(c) to the Remuneration Report, prepared in accordance with the Corporations regulations, or the fixed salary 
of a full time employee of the Company. 
(b)  Key Management Personnel 
Other  than  the  Directors  and  secretary,  the  Company  had  no  key  management  personnel  for  the  financial 
period ended 30 June 2014. 
(c)  Remuneration Options: Granted and vested during the financial year ended 30 June 2014 
There were no remuneration options granted during the financial year ended 30 June 2014.  
(d)  Share and Option holdings 
All equity dealings with directors have been entered into with terms and conditions no more favourable than 
those that the entity would have adopted if dealing at arm’s length. 
Shares held by Directors and Officers 
Period from 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014 
Balance at 
beginning 
of period 
Received as 
Remuneration 
Purchased 
Net Change 
Other 
Balance at 
end of year 
I. Scotland 
A. Schreck 
G. Robertson 
A. Ho¹ 
G. Frangeskides² 
- 
- 
        - 
- 
- 
- 
¹ Resigned as a director on 13 August 2013 
²Resigned as a director on 27 December 2013 
Period from 1 July 2012 to 30 June 2013 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
51
17,500,000 
- 
17,500,000 
- 
- 
- 
- 
10,952,381 
10,952,381 
- 
- 
        - 
- 
- 
-                           
17,500,000 
10,952,381 
28,452,381 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                  
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
V. Fayad¹ 
A. Ho² 
G. Robertson 
I. Scotland 
G. Frangeskides 
Balance at 
beginning 
of period 
         62,500 
- 
        - 
- 
- 
62,500 
Received as 
Remuneration 
Purchased 
Net Change 
Other 
Balance at 
end of year 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
(62,500) 
- 
- 
- 
-                           
(62,500) 
- 
- 
        - 
- 
- 
- 
¹ Resigned as a director on 12 October 2012 
² Resigned as a director on 13 August 2013 
Options held by Officers and Directors 
Period from 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2014 
Received as 
Remuneration 
Net Change 
Other 
Expired during 
period 
Balance at 
end of year 
Balance at 
beginning 
of period 
- 
- 
I. Scotland 
A. Schreck 
G. Robertson 
        250,000 
A. Ho¹ 
G. Frangeskides² 
- 
- 
- 
3,000,000 
9,000,000 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
- 
250,000 
9,000,000 
3,000,000 
¹ Resigned as a director on 13 August 2013 
²Resigned as a director on 27 December 2013 
(e) Related Party Transactions 
- 
- 
3,000,000 
9,000,000 
(250,000) 
- 
- 
(250,000) 
- 
- 
- 
12,000,000 
2014 
$ 
2013 
$ 
Payments to: 
Lawler Corporate Finance Pty Limited¹ 
- 
24,000 
¹  Fees paid in the normal course of business for service rendered. Mr Vincent Fayad, a former director of the Company is 
a director of Lawler Corporate Finance Pty Ltd.  
19. SEGMENT INFORMATION 
The  group’s  operations  are  in  one  business  segment  being  the  resources  sector.  The  group  operates  in one 
geographical segment being Australia.  All subsidiaries in the group operate within the same segment. 
Basis of accounting for purposes of reporting by operating segments 
Accounting policies adopted 
52
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
Unless  stated  otherwise,  all  amounts  reported  to  the  Board  of  Directors  as  the  chief  decision  maker  with 
respect to operating segments are determined in accordance with accounting policies that are consistent to 
those adopted in the annual financial statements of the Company. 
Inter-segment transactions 
Inter-segment  loans  payable  and  receivable  are  initially  recognised  at  the  consideration  received  net  of 
transaction costs. If inter-segment loans receivable and payable are not on commercial terms, these are not 
adjusted to fair value based on market interest rates. This policy represents a departure from that applied to 
the statutory financial statements 
Segment assets 
Where  an  asset  is  used  across  multiple  segments,  the  asset  is  allocated  to  the  segment  that  receives  the 
majority of economic value from the asset. In the majority of instances, segment assets are clearly identifiable 
on the basis of their nature and physical location. 
Unless indicated otherwise in the segment assets note, investments in financial assets, deferred tax assets and 
intangible assets have not been allocated to operating segments. 
Segment liabilities 
Liabilities  are  allocated  to  segments  where  there  is  direct nexus between the incurrence of the liability and 
the  operations  of  the  segment.  Borrowings  and  tax  liabilities  are  generally  considered  to  relate  to  the 
Company  as a whole and are not allocated. Segment liabilities include trade and other payables and certain 
direct borrowings. 
Unallocated items 
Administration  and  other  operating  expenses  are  not  allocated  to  operating  segments  as  they  are  not 
considered part of the core operations of any segment. 
20. EARNINGS PER SHARE 
Reconciliation of earnings per share 
Basic and diluted earnings per share 
Profit/(loss) used in the calculation of the basic 
earnings per share 
Weighted average number of ordinary shares: 
Used in calculating basic earnings per ordinary share 
Dilutive potential ordinary shares 
Used in calculating diluted earnings per share 
21. AUDITORS REMUNERATION 
Auditor of parent entity 
Audit or review of financial reports 
Non-audit services 
53
2014 
Cents 
2013 
Cents 
            (0.51) 
         (1.48) 
(1,095,726) 
(881,641)     
214,619,095 
- 
214,619,095 
59,649,385 
- 
59,649,385 
2014 
$ 
2013 
$ 
21,600 
- 
21,600 
21,300 
- 
21,300 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
22. CASH FLOW INFORMATION 
Reconciliation of net cash used in operating activities with profit after income tax 
Loss after income tax 
Non-cash flows in loss: 
Impairment of investments 
Share based payments 
Exploration written off 
Depreciation 
Changes in assets and liabilities: 
(Increase) in trade and other receivables 
(Decrease)/Increase in trade and other payables 
Increase in exploration 
Net cash (outflow) from operating activities 
Non-cash Financing and Investing Activities 
2014 
$ 
(1,095,726) 
31,250 
494,868 
65,787 
230 
2013 
$ 
(881,641) 
17,500 
20,000 
189,980 
- 
(57,424) 
89,169 
(980,438) 
(1,452,284) 
(2,944) 
(317,243) 
(65,484) 
(1,039,832) 
During the period the Company issued 106,944,444 shares at a deemed price of 2 cents per share to acquire 
Roar Resources Pty Limited (Roar). 
In  addition  the  company  issued  15,000,000  shares  at  a  deemed  price of 2 cents per share in relation to the 
Roar acquisition and the capital raising. 
A  further  12,000,000  shares  were  issued  at  a  deemed  price  of  2.08  cents  per  share  to  extinguish  a  debt 
obligation of $250,000.   
23. PARENT ENTITY DISCLOSURES 
  Financial Position 
Current Assets 
Cash and cash equivalents 
Trade and other receivables 
Financial assets 
Total Current Assets 
Non-current Assets 
Office equipment 
Financial assets 
Evaluation and exploration expenditure 
Total Non-current assets 
2014 
$ 
806,586 
1,035,574 
1,250 
1,843,410 
2,070 
2,409,835 
80,425 
2,492,330 
2013 
$ 
510,254 
203,336 
32,500 
746,090 
- 
140,002 
67,448 
207,450 
Total Assets 
4,335,740 
953,540 
Current Liabilities 
Trade and other payables 
Liability for deferred consideration 
Total Current Liabilities 
278,831 
- 
278,831 
188,662 
250,000 
438,662 
54
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
TOTAL LIABILITIES 
NET ASSETS 
EQUITY  
Issued capital 
Reserves 
Accumulated losses 
TOTAL EQUITY 
Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income 
Total loss 
Total comprehensive loss 
i.  Financial Performance 
278,831 
438,662 
4,056,909 
514,878 
9,817,912 
494,885 
(6,295,216) 
5,612,304 
250,973 
(5,348,399) 
4,056,909 
514,878 
(1,095,726) 
(881,641) 
(1,095,726) 
(881,641) 
The subsidiary acquired did not trade from the date of acquisition with the result that the result of the Group 
equates to the result of the parent for the year. 
ii.  Contingent liabilities and contingent assets 
The parent entity is responsible for the contingent liabilities and contingent assets outlined in note 17. 
iii.  Commitments 
The parent entity is responsible for the commitments outlined in note 16. 
iv.  Related parties 
An interest in subsidiary is set out in note 9. 
Disclosures relating to key management personnel are set out in note 18. 
24. SIGNIFICANT AFTER BALANCE DATE EVENTS 
There  are  currently  no  matters  or  circumstances  that  have  arisen  since  the  end  of  the  financial period that 
have significantly affected or may significantly affect the operations of the consolidated entity, the results of 
those operations, or the state of affairs of the consolidated entity in future financial years.  
25. SHARE BASED PAYMENTS 
Goods or services received or acquired in a share-based payment transaction are recognised as an increase in 
equity  if  the  goods  or  services  were  received  in  an  equity-settled  share-based  payment  transaction  or  as  a 
liability if the goods and services were acquired in a cash settled share-based payment transaction. 
For equity-settled share-based transactions, goods or services received are measured directly at the fair value 
of  the  goods  or  services  received  provided  this  can  be  estimated  reliably.    If  a  reliable  estimate  cannot be 
made the value of the goods or services is determined indirectly by reference to the fair value of the equity 
instrument granted. 
Transactions  with  employees  and  others  providing  similar  services  are  measured  by  reference  to  the  fair 
value at grant date of the equity instrument granted. 
The following share based payments were made during the year: 
55
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITIES 
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2014 
Ordinary shares 
(a)  On 2 December 2013, 15,000,000 ordinary shares were issued to 
advisors  relating  to  the  Roar  Resources  Pty  Ltd  acquisition  and 
the capital raising. 
(b)  On 2 December 2013, 12,000,000 ordinary shares were issued to 
extinguish a debt obligation 
(c)  On  10  October  2012,  1,000,000  ordinary  shares  were  issued  to 
Price per 
share* 
2014 
$ 
2013 
$ 
2 cents 
300,000 
2 cents 
250,000 
- 
- 
vendors as consideration for services rendered. 
5 cents 
- 
50,000 
(d)  On  31  October  2012,  6,000,000  ordinary  shares  were  issued  to 
vendors  advisors as part consideration for acquisition of Spinifex 
Ridge East Pty Limited. 
5 cents 
Applied to debt 
Allocated to cost of raising capital 
Charged to profit and loss 
300,000 
- 
 550,000 
350,000 
(250,000)   (300,000) 
- 
(233,280) 
50,000 
 66,720 
*The fair value of shares issued during the year was determined by reference to market price. 
Share options 
(a)  On  15  August  2013,  25,000,000  unlisted  options  were  issued  to 
advisors and consultants, with an exercise price of 3 cents and an 
expiry date of 31 March 2015 
(b)  On  12  September  2013, 15,000,000 unlisted options were issued 
to advisors and consultants, with an exercise price of 3 cents and 
an expiry date of 31 March 2015 
(c)  On 2 December 2013, 15,000,000 unlisted options were issued to 
management of Roar Resources Pty Ltd, with an exercise price of 
3 cents and an expiry date of 30 November 2018 
2014 
$ 
2013 
$ 
Series 
2 
3 
4 
211,824 
78,804 
137,520 
428,148 
- 
- 
- 
- 
The fair value of equity – settled unlisted share options granted is estimated as at the date of grant using the 
Black and Scholes model taking into account the terms and conditions upon which the options were granted. 
 The  expected  life  of  the  options  is  based  on  historical  data  and  is  not  necessarily  indicative  of  exercise 
patterns  that  may  occur.  The  expected  volatility  reflects  the  assumption  that  the  historical  volatility  is 
indicative  of  future  trends,  which  may  also  not  necessarily  be  the  actual  outcome.  No  other  features  of 
options granted were incorporated into the measurement of fair value. 
56
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RSM Bird Cameron Partners 
Level 12, 60 Castlereagh Street Sydney NSW 2000 
GPO Box 5138 Sydney NSW 2001 
T +61 2 8226 4500    F +61 2 8226 4501 
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT 
TO THE MEMBERS OF 
METAL BANK LIMITED 
Report on the Financial Report  
We  have  audited  the  accompanying  financial  report  of  Metal  Bank  Limited,  which  comprises  the  consolidated 
statement  of  financial  position  as  at  June  2014  ,  and  the  consolidated  statement  of  comprehensive  income, 
consolidated statement of changes  in  equity  and consolidated statement of cash flows for the  year then ended, 
notes  comprising  a  summary  of  significant  accounting  policies  and  other  explanatory  information,  and  the 
directors' declaration of the consolidated entity comprising the company and the entities it controlled at the year’s 
end or from time to time during the financial year. 
Directors’ Responsibility for the Financial Report 
The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation of the financial report that gives a true and fair 
view  in  accordance  with  Australian  Accounting  Standards  and  the  Corporations  Act  2001  and  for  such  internal 
control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the preparation of the financial report that is free from 
material  misstatement,  whether  due  to  fraud  or  error.  In  Note  1,  the  directors  also  state,  in  accordance  with 
Accounting  Standard AASB 101  Presentation of Financial  Statements, that the financial statements comply with 
International Financial Reporting Standards. 
Auditor’s Responsibility 
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial report based on our audit. We conducted our audit in 
accordance  with  Australian  Auditing  Standards.  These  Auditing  Standards  require  that  we  comply  with  relevant 
ethical  requirements  relating  to  audit  engagements  and  plan  and  perform  the  audit  to  obtain  reasonable 
assurance about whether the financial report is free from material misstatement.  
An  audit  involves  performing  procedures  to  obtain  audit  evidence  about  the  amounts  and  disclosures  in  the 
financial  report.  The  procedures  selected  depend  on  the  auditor's  judgement,  including  the  assessment  of  the 
risks  of  material  misstatement  of  the  financial  report,  whether  due  to  fraud  or  error.  In  making  those  risk 
assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity's preparation and fair presentation of the 
financial  report  in  order  to  design  audit  procedures  that  are  appropriate  in  the  circumstances,  but  not  for  the 
purpose  of  expressing  an  opinion  on  the  effectiveness  of  the  entity's  internal  control.  An  audit  also  includes 
evaluating  the  appropriateness  of  accounting  policies  used  and  the  reasonableness  of  accounting  estimates 
made by the directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial report.  
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit 
opinions. 
Liability limited by a 
scheme approved  
under Professional 
Standards Legislation 
Major Offices in: 
Perth, Sydney,  
Melbourne, Adelaide,  
Canberra and Brisbane 
ABN 36 965 185 036 
RSM Bird Cameron Partners is a member of the RSM network.  Each member 
of the RSM network is an independent accounting and advisory firm which 
practises in its own right.  The RSM network is not itself a separate legal entity 
in any jurisdiction. 
58 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Independence  
In conducting our audit, we have complied with the independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001. We 
confirm  that  the  independence  declaration  required  by  the  Corporations  Act  2001,  which  has  been  given  to  the 
directors of Metal Bank Limited, would be in the same terms if given to the directors as at the time of this auditor's 
report.  
Opinion  
In our opinion: 
(a) 
the financial report of Metal Bank Limited is in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including:  
(i) 
giving  a  true  and  fair  view  of  the  consolidated  entity’s  financial  position  as  at  June  2014  and  of  its 
performance for the year ended on that date; and 
(ii) 
complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and 
(b) 
the financial report also complies with International Financial Reporting Standards as disclosed in Note 1   
Emphasis of matter 
Without  qualifying  our  opinion,  we  draw  attention  to  Note  1  in  the  financial  report,  which  indicates  that  the 
company and consolidated entity incurred a loss of $1,095,726 and the consolidated entity had net cash outflows 
from  operating  activities  of  $1,452,284  for  the  year  ended  30  June  2014.    These  conditions,  along  with  other 
matters  as set  forth  in  Note  1,  indicate  the  existence  of  a material  uncertainty  which  may  cast  significant  doubt 
about  the  company  and  consolidated  entity’s  ability  to  continue  as  going  concerns  and  therefore,  the  company 
and consolidated entity may be unable to realise their assets and discharge their liabilities in the normal course of 
business. 
Report on the Remuneration Report  
We have audited the Remuneration Report included in pages 24 to 25 of the directors’ report for the year ended 
30  June  2014.    The  directors  of  the  company  are  responsible  for  the  preparation  and  presentation  of  the 
Remuneration  Report  in  accordance  with  section  300A  of  the  Corporations  Act  2001.  Our  responsibility  is  to 
express  an  opinion  on  the  Remuneration  Report,  based  on  our  audit  conducted  in  accordance  with  Australian 
Auditing Standards.    
Opinion  
In  our  opinion  the  Remuneration  Report  of  Metal  Bank  Limited  for  the  year  ended  30  June  2014  complies  with 
section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001. 
RSM BIRD CAMERON PARTNERS 
Sydney, NSW 
Dated:   26 September 2014 
C J HUME 
Partner 
59 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITY 
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR LISTED COMPANIES 
AS AT 9 SEPTEMBER 2014 
The following additional information is required by the Australian Securities Exchange pursuant to Listing Rule 
4.10.  The information provided is current as at 9 September 2014 unless otherwise stated. 
a.  Distribution of Shareholders 
Number of 
Number held 
share holders 
Number of 
shares 
% of number of 
shares 
1 – 1,000 
1,001 - 5,000 
5,001 - 10,000 
10,001 - 100,000 
100,001+ 
Total 
5 
6 
58 
103 
102 
274 
21 
22,500 
568,847 
4,472,804 
287,865,273 
292,929,445 
0.00% 
0.01% 
0.19% 
1.53% 
98.27% 
100.00% 
b.  The number of shareholders who hold less than a marketable parcel is 120. 
c.  Substantial shareholders 
The names of the substantial shareholders in the Company, the number of equity securities to which 
each substantial shareholder and substantial holder’s associates have a relevant interest, as disclosed 
in substantial holding notices given to the Company are: 
Indigo Pearl Capital Ltd 
Celtic Stars Capital Ltd 
Cartier Peaks Investments Ltd 
Aristo Jet Capital Ltd 
Greenvale Asia Limited 
No of shares 
24,285,647 
24,285,647 
24,285,647 
24,285,647 
24,285,647 
% 
8.29% 
8.29% 
8.29% 
8.29% 
8.29% 
60 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METAL BANK LIMITED AND ITS CONTROLLED ENTITY 
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FOR LISTED COMPANIES 
AS AT 9 SEPTEMBER 2014 
d.  Twenty largest holders of each class of quoted equity security 
Name 
 3. 
 4. 
 2. 
  1. 
Pershing  Australia  Nominees  Pty  Ltd  
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above