Quarterlytics / Consumer Defensive / Packaged Foods / McCormick & Company

McCormick & Company

mkc · NYSE Consumer Defensive
Claim this profile
Ticker mkc
Exchange NYSE
Sector Consumer Defensive
Industry Packaged Foods
Employees 10,000+
← All annual reports
FY2014 Annual Report · McCormick & Company
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
2014 ANNUAL REPORT

SHAWARMA 
SPICE BLEND

This year’s report has the scent of  

a shawarma spice blend. This exotic  

Middle Eastern mixture combines cumin, 

black pepper, clove, cinnamon, paprika, 

turmeric, ginger, coriander and garlic. It is 

used as a spice rub on grilled or roasted 

chicken, beef and lamb that’s eaten as a 

sandwich or wrap. One Middle Eastern  

food reviewer called the casual shawarma-

flavored meal “a little piece of heaven right 

here on Earth.” Shawarma is one of the 

“Global Blends on the Move” featured in 

the McCormick 2015 Flavor Forecast.

Contents:

 4 Letter to Shareholders

 8 People

10  Growth

12 Performance—Financial Highlights

13 Segments at a Glance

14 Directors and Officers

15 Form 10-K Index

17 Form 10-K

72 Investor Information

73 Corporate Social Responsibility

A LOOK AHEAD
A LOOK INSIDE

In 2014 we celebrated 125 years of success and focused 

on our future. In this year’s annual report, we look at 

what’s ahead for McCormick…and look inside at how we 

build value for our shareholders through our people, 

growth and performance.

A LOOK AHEAD
With Boomers looking to eat healthier and Millennials showing interest in home-cooking 
and ethnic fare, demand for bigger and bolder flavors is on the rise. As a global leader in 
flavor, McCormick meets this challenge through iconic brands, trend-setting innovation 
and customer intimacy.

Taste remains the No. 1 pur chasing 
driver, followed by price. Healthfulness 
is No. 3, earning a 

71%response rate up from 61% just  

2 years ago.
Source: IFIC Foundation’s U.S. 2014 Food and Health Survey

6%

The global spice 
and herb category 
is projected to 
grow at a 6%  
compound annual 
growth rate over 
the next 5 years.

We meet consumer 
demand for flavor 
with a robust  
pipeline of new 
products—in fact 

8–10%

of our annual sales 
come from products 
launched in the past 
3 years. 

In 2014, 17%  
of McCormick 
sales came 
from emerging 
markets, up 
from 10%  
just 3  
years ago.

#1

60%of our consumer 
business sales are 
comprised of brands 
with a No. 1 position  
in markets across the 
globe. In addition to 
our leadership in 

spices and seasonings, we have the No. 1 
brand of dessert products in France, wet 
marinades in U.S., honey in Canada, 
ketchup in China and mustard in Poland.

We own a 22% share of the

$10 billion

2014
2014
2014
Global Category
Global Category
Global Category
Share
Share
Share

global packaged spice and herb category,  
4x that of the next largest competitor.

2014
Global Category
Share

2014
2014
Global Category
Global Category
Share
Share

Source: Euromonitor International
Source: Euromonitor International

Source: Euromonitor International

McCormick

McCormick
McCormick
Competitor A
Competitor A

Competitor A

Competitor B

Competitor B
Competitor B

Competitor C                   

Competitor C                   
Competitor C                   

All Others                
All Others                

All Others                

McCormick

McCormick

McCormick
Competitor A
Competitor C                    All Others

Competitor C                    All Others

Competitor B

Competitor A

Competitor A

Competitor B

Competitor B

Competitor C                    All Others

McCormick features a diverse product portfolio with flavors for food at home and away 
from home, products from premium to value-priced, and flavors beyond spices and herbs.

Source: Euromonitor International

Source: Euromonitor International

Source: Euromonitor International

2

A LOOK INSIDE
We operate from more than 50 locations in 24 countries.

These five pillars are the foundation of our business and drive 
our success in markets around the world.
Passion for Flavor™

Taste You Trust ™

Around the globe, home cooks and professional chefs 
alike turn to McCormick for flavor and culinary inspiration. 
We have substantial and sustained investment to support 
innovation with product development centers in 12 countries. 
Over the past 5 years, we have increased brand marketing 
support by 50% to better connect with consumers.

Power of People ™

Globally, more than 10,000 McCormick employees  
are catalysts for innovation and, together, keep the 
company growing.

Sales
(dollars in billons) 

We are building on our legacy of corporate social 
responsibility and working toward ambitious goals. 
McCormick was named a top 10 U.S. company in the  
2014 Newsweek Green Ranking.

Inspiring Healthy Choices

In 2014, we convened a summit for academia, health 
professionals, chefs, government and the food industry  
to examine the state of the science on spices and herbs, 
and to cultivate a dialogue on how flavorful eating can 
offer potential solutions to improve America’s health.

Delivering High Performance

In the past 10 years, we increased sales 68% and more 
than doubled adjusted earnings per share.

$4.2

Asia/Pacific

Americas

Americas

Asia/Pacific
Europe,
Middle East
Europe,
and Africa
Middle East
and Africa

’04

’05

’06

’07

’08

’09

’10

’11

’12

’13

’14

McCormick Employees by Location

McCormick Employees by Location

$4.01

$4.12

$3.70

$3.34

$3.18

$3.19

$2.92

$2.72

$2.53

$2.59

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 3

5

4

3

2

1

0

FELLOW 
SHAREHOLDERS,

This past year as we celebrated our 125th anniversary, we connected with consumers all over 

the world and gained inspiration from them. Today, we see a growing desire for more authentic, 

bigger and bolder flavors, led by the more adventurous, collaborative, and tech-savvy Millennial 

generation, a rising middle-class in emerging markets and an overall desire to eat healthier.

  As a global leader in flavor with a mission to save your world from boring food, McCormick is 

well positioned for growth. While many aspects of our business are rooted in our heritage,  

we are evolving very rapidly with a focus on innovation. If you take a look inside McCormick, 

you will see people throughout the company and across the globe committed to making food 

taste great and be better for you. Together, we will leverage our passion for flavor to deliver  

PERFORMANCE 
In 2014 we delivered a solid increase in sales, profit and cash flow.  
While we continue to operate in a challenging environment, we made 
progress with our growth initiatives and improved productivity through  
our Comprehensive Continuous Improvement (CCI) program. 

  We grew net sales 3% with increases in both our consumer and 
industrial businesses. For our consumer business we grew sales of our 
leading brands through pricing actions, product innovation, brand 
marketing support and an acquisition in China that was completed in  
mid-2013. Our industrial business sales increased primarily through 
pricing actions and new products. 

  We reported operating income of $603 million. Adjusted operating 
income, which excludes the impact of special charges and a 2013 charge 
related to a voluntary pension settlement, rose 3% to $608 million. The 
benefit of higher sales and $69 million of CCI and other cost savings was 
offset in part by higher material costs and a greater investment in brand 
marketing. We continue to measure a positive return on our brand 
marketing and raised our level of spending by 9% in 2014 to build further 
momentum.

In 2014, our earnings per share was $3.34. On a comparable basis, 

adjusted earnings per share rose 8% to $3.37 from $3.13 in 2013. In 
addition to higher operating income, we lowered our shares outstanding 
and our joint venture in Mexico had excellent results. We congratulate 
Grupo Herdez, our partner in this joint venture, on their 100th anniversary.

high performance.

Total Annual
Shareholder 
Return

18%

13%

10%

10%

1-YR

5-YR

10-YR 20-YR

Total annual shareholder 

return has risen 10% or 

more for the past 1, 5, 10 

and 20-year periods.

4

20

15

10

5

0

 
 
 
 
 
“

Our engaged teams are united by  
a passion for flavor and are the key 
ingredient to our success.

”

—  Alan D. Wilson 

Chairman & CEO

  We have a long history of cash generation and returning cash to  

share holders. In 2014, we reached $504 million of cash flow and returned 
a record $437 million to our shareholders through dividends and share 
repurchases, an increase of 22% from the previous year. 

  Our focus on performance, growth and people has led to strong  
long-term results for the past decade. During this period, we have grown 
sales 68%, more than doubled earnings per share, increased our quarterly 
dividend 150% and achieved 10% total annual shareholder return.

GROWTH   
Our financial performance in 2014, and over the long term, demonstrates 
the effectiveness of our growth model. We invest in the business to drive 
sales and profit, fueling this growth with cost savings from our CCI 
program. In each of the past five years, annual cost savings from this 
program have exceeded $50 million. 

  New products launched in the past three years accounted for 8% of  

sales in 2014. Consumer insights drive our product development work, 
which has led to the introduction of gluten-free recipe mixes and the 
expansion of salt-free seasoning blends to inspire healthy choices. For 
price conscious consumers, we added squeeze pouch ketchup in China 
and Grill Mates® burger seasonings and value-priced grinders in the U.S. 
New skillet sauces meet demand for convenience in the U.S., and we 
introduced gourmet cooks in the U.K. to new FlavorLock™ herbs. In our 
industrial business, sales contribution from new products was particularly 
strong in 2014, led by snack seasonings and flavors for new restaurant 
menu items. Across our consumer and industrial business, new products 

29 YEARS

We have increased dividends 
for each of the past 29 years 
and paid dividends every year 
since 1925.

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 5

 
 
 
increase our ability to flavor all types of eating occasions, from preparing 
a meal at home to fine dining to grabbing a quick snack. 

In 2014 we increased our investment in brand marketing support to 

$227 million, and are planning further increases to create momentum for 
future growth. While a portion of this spending is devoted to creating 
awareness and trial for new products, the majority is aimed at building 
consumer equity for our leading brands in markets around the world. We 
are emph asizing product freshness, our role in preparing healthy food and 
the ability of a homemade meal to bring people together. 

  Digital marketing continues to achieve one of our highest returns on 
investment in brand marketing, and in 2014 we spent twice as much in this 
area compared to 2011. Through digital marketing we connect directly with 
consumers to provide personalized recipes, build grilling communities—now 
one million strong—and bring together those with a common interest to share 
flavor stories. Because of these efforts, L2, a business intelligence service, 
recognized McCormick as a food industry leader in its Digital IQ Index. 
  Customer intimacy is another growth strategy for our business. 

Among our broad range of customers are multi-national industry leaders: 
for our industrial business, top customers include food manufacturers and 
restaurants, while on the consumer side of our business we are a category 
leader for food retailers in markets around the world. Our sales teams 
collaborate with these retailers on merchandising, product assortment  
and pricing to create solutions that are optimal for us, our customers  
and consumers. 

In China, we also work with customers to expand our geographic reach.  

Including both consumer and industrial sales, China is now our third largest 
country in sales. Acquisitions played a role in this growth in China, where  
in mid-2014 we celebrated the first anniversary of our acquisition of 
Wuhan Asia Pacific Condiments, which is exceeding our sales and profit 
projections. Since 2008, we have invested $1.3 billion in acquisitions and 
are pursuing other acquisitions with a focus on emerging markets, which 
now account for 17% of consolidated sales. 

Importantly, we continue to grow our business responsibly and are 
making great progress with our goals to improve our environmental 
impact, source sustainably and inspire healthy food choices. Also in 2014,  
we were pleased, through our 125th anniversary Flavor of Together 
program, to donate $1.25 million to United Way Worldwide to help feed 
those in need.

PEOPLE
Our engaged teams—the Power of People™—are catalysts for innovation 
and a source of support for the communities where we operate. We 
recognize the efforts of our employees in making 2014 a year of strong 
financial performance and positioning the company for long-term growth.
As we conclude our 125th anniversary, our theme—the Flavor of Together—
endures. The spirit of “together” has its foundation in McCormick’s  

FOREFRONT OF

EATING
TRENDS

Now in its 15th year, the 
McCormick Flavor Forecast®  
is on the forefront of identify-
ing top trends, insights and 
ingredients driving the future 
of flavor.

$227
MILLION

In 2014 we increased our 
investment in brand 
marketing support to 
$227 million, and are 
planning further increases 
to create momentum 
for future growth.

6

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Multiple Management, a philosophy that dates back to 1932 and is the 
cornerstone of our culture steeped in participation and inclusion. Multiple 
Management continues to be a driving force in solving business challenges, 
creating growth opportunities and developing our next generation of 
business leaders. 

  McCormick’s Board of Directors and company leaders have been 

effective in adapting our strategy to address today’s business challenges 
and pursue compelling growth opportunities. Lawrence Kurzius has been 
promoted to Chief Operating Officer & President and will also serve as 
President Global Consumer. As a respected leader, Lawrence has driven 
growth and efficiency in both the U.S. and international markets since 
joining the company in 2003. In addition, the leadership of Malcolm Swift, 
President Europe, Middle East and Africa and Asia Pacific, has been 
expanded to include President Global Industrial. We appreciate the many 
contributions of Bill Stevens, who is departing from the Board. He has 
served as a director since 1988. Retiring from the company after more 
than 30 years of distinguished service and strong leadership are Chuck 
Langmead, President—Global Industrial Business and Geoff Carpenter, 
Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary. 

I am confident that we have the right team, strategies and portfolio to 

continue our momentum. As we embark on the next 125 years, I want to 
thank you, McCormick’s shareholders. We appreciate your support and  
are dedicated to building the value of your investment in our company.

Alan D. Wilson
Chairman & CEO

Across our consumer  
and industrial business,  
new products increase our 
ability to flavor all types of 
eating occasions.

OUR 
MISSION
To save your world 
from boring food!

OUR 
VISION
McCormick brings 
the joy of flavor to 
every day.

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 7

 
 
 
Teamwork and plant modernization  
in the manufacturing of bouillon and other 
products in China led to a seamless integra-
tion of Wuhan Asia Pacific Condiments, 
capped off by record results for this  
business in 2014. 

Hundreds of future 

business leaders  

participate on one  

of McCormick’s 17 

Multiple Management 

Boards. In locations 

around the world, 

employees on these 

Boards develop core 

leadership skills while 

working on projects 

that contribute to the 

company’s success.

PEOPLE
Ready Talent, Fully Engaged

McCormick employees are the key ingredient to our success. While our 

business continues to grow globally, we are committed to strengthening 

and aligning our workforce to meet our ambitious growth objectives. 

McCormick’s High Performance Organization principles provide a 

common global framework to leverage process excellence and the 

strength of our culture with a focus on teamwork, engagement and  

the foundation of our Multiple Management Board (MMB) system. 

Additionally, we are excited about the potential of “MySuccess,” a 

recently introduced, comprehensive tool to further ready our talent 

with development opportunities, performance management and career 

progression. This new tool enhances an already robust talent review 

process and will ensure we have the right leaders in key roles across  

the organization. 

We are proud that our employees are engaged in the company’s success. 
  More than 1,000 of our current business leaders have participated in and 

developed through our MMB system, now in its 82nd year. 

  In addition, we had a best-in-class global participation rate of 92% in our latest 

Voice of the Employee survey. 

  In our 125th year, many employees participated in our annual Charity Day program. 

  In just the past three years, employees have formed five different employee 

ambassador groups, which are advancing a spirit of inclusion at McCormick. 

  All of these efforts have led to a lower-than-average employee turnover rate 

in each of our major markets.

Employees around the 
world gathered to  
celebrate McCormick’s 
125th anniversary.

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 9

GROWTH
Win Share with Global Focus

McCormick is a global leader in flavor. In our consumer business, 60%  

of sales come from brands that are No. 1 in their category. For spices 

and seasonings our global retail category share is more than four times 

that of the next largest competitor. Recipe mixes represent our sec-

ond largest category, and, in 2014, we increased our category share in 

the U.S. Rounding out our consumer business are “regional leaders,” 

brands with a leading category share in a specific market, such as 

Vahiné® dessert products in France and McCormick® ketchup in China. 

With our broad range of flavor solutions in our industrial business, we 

are a leading supplier of seasonings to the snack industry and of con-

diments and other flavor products to restaurants worldwide. 

In 2014, digital marketing 
exceeded 15% of total brand 
marketing and included the 
launch of FlavorPrint, a per-
sonalized recipe engine.

  Across both segments, we drive sales growth with innovation. In 

recent years 8% to 10% of sales came from products launched in the 

past three years. We are gaining consumer insights and identifying fla-

vor trends to develop products that are preferred by consumers. With 

16 innovation centers in 12 countries we adapt proven McCormick con-

cepts like grinders and grilling to local tastes. This global scope also 

supports the geographic expansion of our industrial customers that 

include multi-national food manufacturers and restaurants. Our acqui-

sition activity provides another avenue of growth across regions and 

into new flavor categories. Primarily through acquisitions, we have more 

than doubled the percentage of sales in emerging markets to 17% in 

2014 from 8% in 2009. In addition to building our business through 

acquisitions, we are investing in brand marketing to grow sales. We 

benefit from a strong return on our marketing programs and invested 

twice as much in brand marketing in 2014 as we did in 2007.

This “global pantry” is stocked with iconic McCormick 
products from around the world.

10

 
 
 
 
 
McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 11

PERFORMANCE
Superior Results, Consistently Delivered

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

For the year ended November 30 (millions except per share data)

2014

2013

% Change

Charts pG 12

Charts pG 12

Charts pG 12

Dividends paid

Dividends paid per share

Net sales

Gross profit

  Gross profit margin

Operating income

  Operating income margin

Net income

Earnings per share—diluted

Cash flow from operations

$4,243.2

1,730.2

$4,123.4

1,665.8

40.8%

603.0

14.2%

437.9

3.34

503.6

192.4

1.48

40.4%

550.5

13.4%

389.0

2.91

465.2

179.9

1.36

2.9%

3.9%

9.5%

12.6%

14.8%

8.3%

6.9%

8.8%

We are providing below certain non-GAAP financial results excluding items affecting comparability. The details of these 
adjustments are provided in the Non-GAAP Financial Measures of the Management’s Discussion & Analysis on pages 33 and 34.

Adjusted operating income

  Adjusted operating income margin 

Adjusted net income

Adjusted earnings per share—diluted

2014

2013

% Change

$  608.2

$  590.8

14.3%

441.6

3.37

14.3%

418.2

3.13

2.9%

5.6%

7.7%

Net Sales by 

Net Sales by 

Segment and Region

Segment and Region

Net Sales by 
Segment and Region

CCI
(dollars in millions) 

CCI
(dollars in millions) 

Uses of Cash Flow 
2005—2014 

Uses of Cash Flow 
CCI
2005—2014 
(dollars in millions) 

Uses of Cash Flow 

2005—2014 

14%

14%

8%

8%

80

70

60

50

40%

40%

25%

25%

40

40%

8%

5%

8%

5%

30

20

10

0

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

14%

8%

80

$65

$63 $65
$65

70

$63 $65

$54

$56

$54

60
$56

$42

$42

25%

50

40

30

20

10

18%

$65

18%

$63 $65

30%

30%

$54

$56

30%

$42

20%

20%

20%

32%

32%

32%

8%

5%

’09

’10

’09

’11

’12

’10

’13

’11

0
’12

’14

’13

’14

’09

’10

’11

’12

’13

’14

Consumer Business

Consumer Business

Industrial Business

Industrial Business

Consumer Business

Industrial Business

Americas     

Americas     

Americas    

Americas    

Europe, 

Europe, 

Europe, 

Europe, 

Middle East 

Middle East 

Middle East 

Middle East 

and Africa       

and Africa       

and Africa    

and Africa    

Americas     

Europe, 
Middle East 
and Africa       

Americas    

Europe, 
Middle East 
and Africa    

Asia/Pacific   

Asia/Pacific   

Asia/Pacific   

Asia/Pacific   

Asia/Pacific   

Asia/Pacific   

Cost Savings From CCI Program
Cost Savings From CCI Program
Since its inception in 2009, we have 
Since its inception in 2009, we have 
achieved $345 million in CCI-related 
achieved $345 million in CCI-related 
cost savings. 
cost savings. 

12

Dividends       

Net Share Repurchases

Dividends       

Net Share Repurchases

Cost Savings From CCI Program
Since its inception in 2009, we have 
achieved $345 million in CCI-related 
cost savings. 

Capital Expenditures              

Capital Expenditures              

Acquisitions

Acquisitions

Balanced Use of Cash
Balanced Use of Cash
For the past decade, we have had
For the past decade, we have had
a balanced use of cash, returning 48%
a balanced use of cash, returning 48%
to shareholders through dividends
to shareholders through dividends
and share repurchases, net of option
and share repurchases, net of option
exercise proceeds.
exercise proceeds.

18%

Dividends       

Net Share Repurchases

Capital Expenditures              

Acquisitions

Balanced Use of Cash

For the past decade, we have had

a balanced use of cash, returning 48%

to shareholders through dividends

and share repurchases, net of option

exercise proceeds.

SEGMENTS AT A GLANCE

Consumer Business

Net Sales 

(dollars in billions)

Adjusted Operating Income 

(dollars in millions)

$2.6

$474

3000

31%We grew sales 31%  

2500

2000

1500

500

400

300

1000

and adjusted operating 
income 18% in the  
past 5 years.

500

0

200

100

0

Products at  

every price  

point—from  

premium  

gourmet to 

value-priced.

Net Sales 

(dollars in billions)

Adjusted Operating Income 

(dollars in millions)

$1.6

$134

2000

1500

1000

500

0

150

120

90

60

30

0

’10

’11

’12

’13

’14

’10

’11

’12

’13

’14

’10

’11

’12

’13

’14

’10

’11

’12

’13

’14

Our Leading Brands Stand for Flavor.

$1,599 $1,585

$1,498

$1,338

$122

$119

$112

$107

$456

$472

$1,999

$2,538

$2,415

$428

$402

$2,200

135We have brands in more than 

135 countries and territories.

Bertie

Industrial Business

21%

Performance
We grew sales 21% and adjusted operat-
ing income 25% in the past 5 years.

Net Sales 

(dollars in billions)

Adjusted Operating Income 

(dollars in millions)

Globally, we sell to 9 of the top  
10 food and beverage companies  
and 9 of the top 10 foodservice  
and restaurant chains.

500

$1.6

$134

400

300

WE HAVE ONE OF THE BROADEST 
RANGES OF FLAVOR SOLUTIONS 
IN THE INDUSTRY, including snack 
seasonings, sandwich sauces and 
branded foodservice products.

200

100

0

2000

1500

1000

500

0

150

120

90

60

30

0

Net Sales 

(dollars in billions)

Adjusted Operating Income 

(dollars in millions)

$2.6

$474

3000

2500

2000

1500

1000

500

0

’10

’11

’12

’13

’14

’10

’11

’12

’13

’14

’10

’11

’12

’13

’14

’10

’11

’12

’13

’14

$2,538

$2,415

$2,200

$1,999

$456

$472

$428

$402

$1,498

$1,338

$1,599 $1,585

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 13
$112

$122

$119

$107

Board of Directors

John P. Bilbrey 58
President and  
Chief Executive Officer
The Hershey Company
Hershey, Pennsylvania
Director since 2005

J. Michael Fitzpatrick 68
Former Chairman and  
Chief Executive Officer  
Citadel Plastics Holdings, Inc.
Radnor, Pennsylvania
Director since 2001

Compensation Committee

Audit Committee

Freeman A. Hrabowski, III 64
President
University of Maryland
Baltimore County
Baltimore, Maryland
Director since 1997

Nominating/Corporate  
Governance Committee*

Patricia Little 54
Executive Vice President and  
Chief Financial Officer
Kelly Services, Inc.
Troy, Michigan
Director since 2010

Audit Committee*

Michael D. Mangan 58
Former President, Worldwide 
Power Tools & Accessories
The Black & Decker Corporation
Towson, Maryland
Director since 2007**

Compensation Committee 
Nominating/Corporate  
Governance Committee

Margaret M.V. Preston 57
Managing Director 
Private Wealth Management
TD Bank
New York, New York
Director since 2003

Nominating/Corporate  
Governance Committee

Gordon M. Stetz, Jr. 54
Executive Vice President &  
Chief Financial Officer
McCormick & Company, Inc.
Director since 2011

William E. Stevens 72
Chairman
BBI Group, Inc.
St. Louis, Missouri
Director since 1988

Compensation Committee*

Executive Officers

Alan D. Wilson
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

Gordon M. Stetz, Jr.
Executive Vice President &  
Chief Financial Officer

Paul C. Beard
Senior Vice President, Finance

Jeffery D. Schwartz
Vice President, General Counsel  
& Corporate Secretary

Lawrence E. Kurzius
Chief Operating Officer & President
President Global Consumer

Cecile K. Perich
Senior Vice President,  
Human Relations

Michael R. Smith
Senior Vice President, Finance
Capital Markets & Chief Financial 
Officer North America

Malcolm Swift
President, EMEA and Asia Pacific
President Global Industrial

Jacques Tapiero 56
Former Senior Vice President and  
President, Emerging Markets
Eli Lilly and Company
Indianapolis, Indiana
Director since 2012

Audit Committee

Alan D. Wilson 57
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
McCormick & Company, Inc.
Director since 2007

  * Indicates Chair Position on the Committee
** Lead Director

14

Table of Contents to Form 10-K

PART I 

Item 1 

Item 1A 

Item 1B 

Item 2 

Item 3 

Item 4 

PART II
Item 5 

Item 6 

Item 7 

Item 7A 

Item 8 

Business  

Risk Factors 

Unresolved Staff Comments 

Properties 

Legal Proceedings 

Mine Safety Disclosures 

 Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder  
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 

Selected Financial Data 

 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition  
and Results of Operations 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data 
 Report of Management 
 Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 
 Consolidated Income Statement 
 Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income 
 Consolidated Balance Sheet 
 Consolidated Cash Flow Statement 
 Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity 
 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 

Item 9 

 Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on  
Accounting and Financial Disclosure 

Item 9A 

Controls and Procedures 

Item 9B 

Other Information 

PART III

Item 10 

Item 11 

Item 12 

Item 13 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance 

Executive Compensation 

 Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and  
Management and Related Stockholder Matters 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and  
Director Independence 

Item 14 

Principal Accountant Fees and Services 

PART IV
Item 15 

Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules 

 Page

19

21

25

25

25

25

26

27

28

40

41
41
42
44
44
45
46
47
48

65

65

65

66

66

66

66

66

66

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 15

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
UNITED STATES 
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549 

FORM 10-K 

(Mark One)
S		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT  

OF 1934 

For the fiscal year ended November 30, 2014 

OR
£		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT 

OF 1934 

For the transition period from              to  

Commission file number 001-14920 

McCORMICK & COMPANY, INCORPORATED 
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) 

Maryland 
(State or other jurisdiction of 
incorporation or organization) 

18 Loveton Circle, Sparks, Maryland 
(Address of principal executive offices) 

52-0408290
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)

21152
(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (410) 771-7301 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: 

Title of Each Class 

Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered

Common Stock, No Par Value 
Common Stock Non-Voting, No Par Value 

New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Not applicable. 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    
Yes S  No £

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.   Yes £  No S

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities 
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such 
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes S	 No £  

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 17

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every 
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or 
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes S	 No £  

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not 
be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III 
of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. S	

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller 
reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 
of the Exchange Act. Check one:  

Large accelerated filer   S 

Accelerated filer 

£  

Non-accelerated filer   £   (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) 

Smaller reporting company  £ 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes £    No S	

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the 
price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked prices of such common equity, as of the last business 
day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.

The aggregate market value of the Voting Common Stock held by non-affiliates at May 31, 2014: $859,593,668

The aggregate market value of the Non-Voting Common Stock held by non-affiliates at May 31, 2014: $8,504,657,615

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. 

Class 

Number of Shares Outstanding 

Date

Common Stock 
Common Stock Non-Voting 

11,963,137 
116,305,343 

December 31, 2014
December 31, 2014

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE 

Document 

Part of 10-K into Which Incorporated

Proxy Statement for
McCormick’s March 25, 2015
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
(the “2015 Proxy Statement”) 

Part III

18

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PART I.

As used herein, references to “McCormick,” “we,” “us” and “our” 
are to McCormick & Company, Incorporated and its consolidated 
subsidiaries or, as the context may require, McCormick & Company, 
Incorporated only.

served directly and indirectly through distributors or wholesalers.  
In addition to marketing our branded products to these customers, 
we are also a leading supplier of private label items, also known as 
store brands.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

McCormick is a global leader in flavor. The company manufactures, 
markets and distributes spices, seasoning mixes, condiments and 
other flavorful products to the entire food industry—retail outlets, 
food manufacturers and foodservice businesses. Our major sales, 
distribution and production facilities are located in North America, 
Europe and China. Additional facilities are based in Australia, Mexico, 
India, Singapore, Central America, Thailand and South Africa. 
McCormick & Company, Incorporated was formed in 1915 under 
Maryland law as the successor to a business established in 1889.

Business Segments
We operate in two business segments, consumer and industrial. 
Demand for flavor is growing globally, and across both segments we 
have the customer base and product breadth to participate in all 
types of eating occasions. Our products deliver flavor when cooking 
at home, dining out, purchasing a quick service meal or enjoying a 
snack. We offer our customers and consumers a range of products 
from premium to value-priced. 

Consistent with market conditions in each segment, our consumer 
business has a higher overall profit margin than our industrial busi-
ness. Historically, the consumer business contributes approximately 
60% of sales and 80% of operating income, and the industrial  
business contributes approximately 40% of sales and 20% of oper-
ating income.

For financial information about our business segments, please refer 
to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis—Results of Operations” 
and note 16 of the financial statements.

For a discussion of our recent acquisition activity, please refer to 
“Management’s Discussion and Analysis—Acquisitions” and note 2 
of the financial statements. 

Consumer Business. From locations around the world, our brands 
reach consumers in more than 135 countries and territories. Our 
leading brands in the Americas include McCormick®, Lawry’s®  
and Club House®. We also market authentic ethnic brands such as 
Zatarain’s®, Thai Kitchen® and Simply Asia®. In Europe, the Middle 
East and Africa (EMEA) our major brands include the Ducros®, 
Schwartz® and Kamis® brands of spices, herbs and seasonings and 
an extensive line of Vahiné® brand dessert items. In the Asia/Pacific 
region, we market products under the McCormick and DaQiao® 
brands in China. In Australia, we market our spices, herbs and sea-
sonings under the McCormick brand and our dessert products under 
the Aeroplane® brand. In India, our majority-owned joint venture 
owns and trades under the Kohinoor® brand.

Our customers span a variety of retail outlets that include grocery, 
mass merchandise, warehouse clubs, discount and drug stores,  

Approximately half of our consumer business is spices, herbs and 
seasonings. For these products, we are a category leader in our  
primary markets. There are a number of competitors in the spices, 
herbs and seasoning category, many with less than 3% share of sales.

More than 250 other brands of spices, herbs and seasonings are 
sold in the U.S. with additional brands in international markets. 
Some are owned by large food manufacturers, while others are  
supplied by small privately owned companies. In this competitive 
environment, we are leading with innovation and brand marketing, 
and applying our analytical tools to help customers optimize the 
profitability of their spice and seasoning category while simultane-
ously increasing our sales.

Industrial Business. In our industrial business, we provide a wide 
range of products to multinational food manufacturers and food-
service customers. The foodservice customers are supplied both 
directly and indirectly through distributors. Among food manufactur-
ers and foodservice customers, many of our relationships have been 
active for decades. We focus our resources on our strategic partners 
that we believe offer the greatest prospects for growth. Our range 
of products remains one of the broadest in the industry and includes 
seasoning blends, spices and herbs, condiments, coating systems 
and compound flavors. In addition to a broad range of flavor solutions, 
we strive to achieve customer intimacy. Our customers benefit from 
our expertise in many areas, including sensory testing, culinary 
research, food safety and flavor application.

Our industrial business has a number of competitors. Some tend to 
specialize in a particular range of products and have a limited geo-
graphic reach. Other competitors include larger publicly held flavor 
companies that are more global in nature, but which also tend to 
specialize in a more limited range of flavor solutions.

Raw Materials
The most significant raw materials used in our business are pepper, 
dairy products, rice, capsicums (red peppers and paprika), onion, 
garlic and wheat flour. Pepper and other spices and herbs are gen-
erally sourced from countries other than the United States. Other 
raw materials, like dairy products and onion, are primarily sourced 
from within the U.S. and locally, for many of our international loca-
tions. Because the raw materials are agricultural products, they are 
subject to fluctuations in market price and availability caused by 
weather, growing and harvesting conditions, market conditions, and 
other factors beyond our control.

We respond to this volatility in a number of ways, including strategic 
raw material purchases, purchases of raw material for future delivery, 
customer price adjustments and cost savings from our Compre hensive 
Continuous Improvement program.

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 19

Customers
Our products are sold directly to customers and also through brokers, 
wholesalers and distributors. In the consumer segment, products are 
then sold to consumers through a variety of retail outlets, including 
grocery, mass merchandise, warehouse clubs, discount and drug 
stores under a variety of brands. In the industrial segment, products  
are used by food and beverage manufacturers as ingredients for 
their finished goods and by foodservice customers as ingredients for 
menu items to enhance the flavor of their foods. Customers for the 
industrial segment include food manufacturers and the foodservice 
industry supplied both directly and indirectly through distributors.

We have a large number of customers for our products. Sales to one 
of our consumer business customers, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., accounted 
for 11% of consolidated sales in 2014, 12% of consolidated sales in 
2013 and 11% of consolidated sales in 2012. Sales to one of our 
industrial business customers, PepsiCo, Inc., accounted for 11% of 
consolidated sales in 2014, 2013 and 2012. In 2014, 2013 and 2012 
the top three customers in our industrial business represented 
between 53% and 54% of our global industrial sales.

The dollar amount of backlog orders for our business is not material 
to an understanding of our business, taken as a whole. No material 
portion of our business is subject to renegotiation of profits or  
termination of contracts or subcontracts at the election of the U.S. 
government.

Trademarks, Licenses and Patents
We own a number of trademark registrations. Although in the aggre-
gate these trademarks are material to our business, the loss of any 
one of those trademarks, with the exception of our “McCormick,” 
“Lawry’s,” “Zatarain’s,” “Club House,” “Ducros,” “Schwartz,” “Vahiné,” 
“Kamis,” “DaQiao” and “Kohinoor” trademarks, would not have a 
material adverse effect on our business. The “Mc – McCormick” 
trademark is extensively used by us in connection with the sale of 
our food products in the U.S. and certain non-U.S. markets. The 
terms of the trademark registrations are as prescribed by law, and 
the registrations will be renewed for as long as we deem them to  
be useful.

We have entered into a number of license agreements authorizing 
the use of our trademarks by affiliated and non-affiliated entities. 
The loss of these license agreements would not have a material 
adverse effect on our business. The term of the license agreements 
is generally three to five years or until such time as either party  
terminates the agreement. Those agreements with specific terms 
are renewable upon agreement of the parties.

We also own various patents, none of which individually are material 
to our business.

Seasonality
Due to seasonal factors inherent in our business, our sales, income 
and cash from operations generally are lower in the first two quarters 
of the fiscal year, increase in the third quarter and are significantly 
higher in the fourth quarter due to the holiday season. This seasonal-
ity reflects customer and consumer buying patterns, primarily in the 
consumer segment.

Working Capital
In order to meet increased demand for our consumer products during 
our fourth quarter, we usually build our inventories during the third 
quarter of the fiscal year. We generally finance working capital items 

20

(inventory and receivables) through short-term borrowings, which 
include the use of lines of credit and the issuance of commercial 
paper. For a description of our liquidity and capital resources, see 
note 6 of the financial statements and the “Liquidity and Financial 
Condition” section of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis.”

Competition
Each segment operates in markets around the world that are highly 
competitive. In this competitive environment, our growth strategies 
include customer intimacy and product innovation based on consumer 
insights. Additionally, in the consumer segment we are building brand 
recognition and loyalty through increased advertising and promotions.

Research and Development
Many of our products are prepared from confidential formulas devel-
oped by our research laboratories and product development teams, 
and, in some cases, customer proprietary formulas. Expenditures for 
research and development were $62.0 million in 2014, $61.3 million 
in 2013, and $57.8 million in 2012. The amount spent on customer- 
sponsored research activities is not material.

Governmental Regulation
We are subject to numerous laws and regulations around the world 
that apply to our global businesses. In the United States, the safety, 
production, transportation, distribution, advertising, labeling and 
sale of many of our products and their ingredients are subject to the 
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, the Food Safety Modernization 
Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, state consumer protection 
laws, competition laws, anti-corruption laws, customs and trade 
laws, federal, state and local workplace health and safety laws,  
various federal, state and local environmental protection laws, and 
various other federal, state and local statutes and regulations. 
Outside the United States, our business is subject to numerous  
similar statutes, laws and regulatory requirements.

Environmental Regulations
The cost of compliance with federal, state and local provisions 
related to protection of the environment has had no material effect 
on our business. There were no material capital expenditures for 
environmental control facilities in fiscal year 2014, and there are no 
material expenditures planned for such purposes in fiscal year 2015.

Employees
We had approximately 10,000 full-time employees worldwide as of 
November 30, 2014. Our operations have not been affected signifi-
cantly by work stoppages and, in the opinion of management, employee 
relations are good. We have no collective bargaining contracts in  
the United States. At our foreign subsidiaries, approximately 1,300 
employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements or  
similar arrangements.

Financial Information about Geographic Locations
For information on the net sales and long-lived assets of McCormick 
by geographic area, see note 16 of the financial statements.

Foreign Operations
We are subject in varying degrees to certain risks typically associ-
ated with a global business, such as local economic and market  
conditions, exchange rate fluctuations, restrictions on investments, 
royalties and dividends. Approximately 45% of sales in fiscal year 
2014 were from non-U.S. operations. For information on how we 
manage some of these risks, see the “Market Risk Sensitivity”  
section of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis.”

Forward-Looking Information
Certain statements contained in this report, including statements 
concerning expected performance such as those relating to net 
sales, earnings, cost savings, acquisitions and brand marketing  
support, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of 
Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These state-
ments may be identified by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” 
“expect,” “should,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “believe” and “plan.” 
These statements may relate to: the expected results of operations 
of businesses acquired by us, the expected impact of raw material 
costs and our pricing actions on our results of operations and gross 
margins, the expected productivity and working capital improvements, 
expected trends in net sales and earnings performance and other 
financial measures, the expectations of pension and postretirement 
plan contributions, the holding period and market risks associated 
with financial instruments, the impact of foreign exchange fluc-
tuations, the adequacy of internally generated funds and existing 
sources of liquidity, such as the availability of bank financing, our 
ability to issue additional debt or equity securities and our expecta-
tions regarding purchasing shares of our common stock under the 
existing authorizations.

These and other forward-looking statements are based on manage-
ment’s current views and assumptions and involve risks and uncer-
tainties that could significantly affect expected results. Results may 
be materially affected by factors such as: damage to our reputation 
or brand name; loss of brand relevance; increased use of private label 
or other competitive products; product quality, labeling, or safety 
concerns; negative publicity about our products; business interrup-
tions due to natural disasters or unexpected events; actions by, and 
the financial condition of, competitors and customers; our ability to 
achieve expected and/or needed cost savings or margin improve-
ments; negative employee relations; the successful acquisition and 
integration of new businesses; issues affecting our supply chain and 
raw materials, including fluctuations in the cost and availability of 
raw and packaging materials; government regulation, and changes in 
legal and regulatory requirements and enforcement practices; global 
economic and financial conditions generally, including the availability 
of financing, and interest and inflation rates; the investment return 
on retirement plan assets, and the costs associated with pension 
obligations; foreign currency fluctuations; the stability of credit and 
capital markets; risks associated with our information technology 
systems, the threat of data breaches and cyber attacks; volatility in 
our effective tax rate; climate change; infringement of our intellec-
tual property rights, and those of customers; litigation, legal and 
administrative proceedings; and other risks described herein under 
Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors.”

Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the  
forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update 
or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a 
result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as  
may be required by law.

Available Information
Our principal corporate internet website address is:  
www.mccormickcorporation.com. We make available free of  
charge through our website our annual report on Form 10-K,  
quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K,  
and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to 
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934  
(the “Exchange Act”) as soon as reasonably practicable after such 
documents are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the United 

States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The SEC 
maintains an Internet website at www.sec.gov that contains reports, 
proxy and information statements, and other information regarding 
McCormick. Our website also includes our Corporate Governance 
Guidelines, Business Ethics Policy and charters of the Audit Committee, 
Compensation Committee, and Nominating/Corporate Governance 
Committee of our Board of Directors.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

The following are certain risk factors that could affect our business, 
financial condition and results of operations. These risk factors should 
be considered in connection with evaluating the forward-looking 
statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K because 
these factors could cause the actual results and conditions to differ 
materially from those projected in forward-looking statements. 
Before you buy our Common Stock or Common Stock Non-Voting, 
you should know that making such an investment involves risks, 
including the risks described below. Additional risks and uncertain-
ties that are not presently known to the company or are currently 
deemed to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our 
business, financial condition, or results of operations in the future.  
If any of the risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or 
results of operations could be negatively affected. In that case, the 
trading price of our securities could decline, and you may lose part  
or all of your investment.

Damage to our reputation or brand name, loss of brand rele­
vance, increase in use of private label or other competitive 
brands by customers or consumers, or product quality or 
safety concerns could negatively impact our business, finan­
cial condition or results of operations.

We have many iconic brands with long-standing consumer recogni-
tion. Our success depends on our ability to maintain our brand image 
for our existing products, extend our brands to new platforms, and 
expand our brand image with new product offerings.

We continually make efforts to maintain and improve relationships 
with our customers and consumers and to increase awareness and 
relevance of our brands through effective marketing and other meas-
ures. From time to time, our customers evaluate their mix of product 
offerings, and consumers have the option to purchase private label 
or other competitive products instead of our branded products. If a 
significant portion of our branded business was switched to private 
label or competitive products, it could have a material negative 
impact on our consumer business.

Our reputation for manufacturing high-quality products is widely  
recognized. In order to safeguard that reputation, we have adopted 
rigorous quality assurance and quality control procedures which are 
designed to ensure the safety of our products. A serious breach of 
our quality assurance or quality control procedures, deterioration of  
our quality image, impairment of our customer or consumer relation-
ships or failure to adequately protect the relevance of our brands 
may lead to litigation, customers purchasing from our competitors or 
consumers purchasing other brands or private label items that may 
or may not be manufactured by us, any of which could have a mate-
rial negative impact on our business, financial condition or results  
of operations.

The food industry generally is subject to risks posed by food spoilage 
and contamination, product tampering, product recall, import alerts 
and consumer product liability claims. For instance, we may be 

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 21

required to recall certain of our products should they be mislabeled, 
contaminated or damaged, and certain of our raw materials could  
be blocked from entering the country if they were subject to import 
alerts. We also may become involved in lawsuits and legal proceed-
ings if it is alleged that the consumption of any of our products could 
cause injury or illness, are mislabeled or fail to meet applicable legal 
requirements (even if the allegation is untrue). A product recall, 
import alert or an adverse result in any such litigation, or negative 
perceptions regarding food products and ingredients, could result in 
our having to pay fines or damages, incur additional costs or cause 
customers and consumers in our principal markets to lose confidence 
in the safety and quality of certain products or ingredients, any of 
which could have a negative effect on our business or financial 
results and, depending upon the significance of the affected prod-
uct, that negative effect could be material to our business or finan-
cial results. Negative publicity about these concerns, whether or not 
valid, may discourage customers and consumers from buying our 
products or cause disruptions in production or distribution of our 
products and adversely affect our business, financial condition or 
results of operations.

The rising popularity of social networking and other consumer- 
oriented technologies has increased the speed and accessibility  
of information dissemination (whether or not accurate), and, as a 
result, negative, inaccurate, or misleading posts or comments on 
websites may generate adverse publicity that could damage our  
reputation or brands.

Customer consolidation, and competitive, economic and other 
pressures facing our customers, may put pressure on our 
operating margins and profitability.

A number of our customers, such as supermarkets, warehouse clubs 
and food distributors, have consolidated in recent years and consoli-
dation could continue. Such consolidation could present a challenge 
to margin growth and profitability in that it has produced large, 
sophisticated customers with increased buying power who are  
more capable of operating with reduced inventories; resisting price 
increases; demanding lower pricing, increased promotional programs 
and specifically tailored products; and shifting shelf space currently 
used for our products to private label products. The economic and 
competitive landscape for our customers is constantly changing, and 
their response to those changes could impact our business. Our 
industrial business may be impacted if the reputation or perception 
of the customers of our industrial business declines. These factors 
and others could have an adverse impact on our business, financial 
condition or results of operations.

The inability to maintain mutually beneficial relationships with 
large customers could adversely affect our business.

We have a number of major customers, including two large custom-
ers that, in the aggregate, constituted approximately 22% of our 
consolidated sales in 2014. The loss of either of these large custom-
ers or a material negative change in our relationship with these 
large customers or other major customers could have an adverse 
effect on our business.

Disruption of our supply chain and issues regarding procure­
ment of raw materials may negatively impact us.

Our purchases of raw materials are subject to fluctuations in market 
price and availability caused by weather, growing and harvesting 

22

conditions, market conditions, governmental actions and other fac-
tors beyond our control. The most significant raw materials used by 
us in our business are pepper, dairy products, rice, capsicums (red 
pepper and paprika), onion, garlic and wheat flour. While future 
price movements of raw material costs are uncertain, we seek to 
mitigate the market price risk in a number of ways, including strate-
gic raw material purchases, purchases of raw material for future 
delivery, customer price adjustments and cost savings from our 
Comprehensive Continuous Improvement program. We generally 
have not used derivatives to manage the volatility related to this 
risk. To the extent that we have used derivatives for this purpose,  
it has not been material to our business. Any actions we take in 
response to market price fluctuations may not effectively limit or 
eliminate our exposure to changes in raw material prices. Therefore, 
we cannot provide assurance that future raw material price fluctua-
tions will not have a negative impact on our business, financial con-
dition or operating results.

In addition, we may have very little opportunity to mitigate the risk 
of availability of certain raw materials due to the effect of weather 
on crop yield, government actions, political unrest in producing coun-
tries, action or inaction by suppliers in response to laws and regu-
lations, changes in agricultural programs and other factors beyond 
our control. Therefore, we cannot provide assurance that future raw 
material availability will not have a negative impact on our business, 
financial condition or operating results.

Political, socio-economic and cultural conditions, as well as disrup-
tions caused by terrorist activities or otherwise, could also create 
additional risks for regulatory compliance. Although we have adopted 
rigorous quality assurance and quality control procedures which are 
designed to ensure the safety of our imported products, we cannot 
provide assurance that such events will not have a negative impact 
on our business, financial condition or operating results.

Our profitability may suffer as a result of competition in  
our markets.

The food industry is intensely competitive. Competition in our prod-
uct categories is based on price, product innovation, product quality, 
brand recognition and loyalty, effectiveness of marketing and pro-
motional activity, and the ability to identify and satisfy consumer 
preferences. From time to time, we may need to reduce the prices 
for some of our products to respond to competitive and customer 
pressures, which may adversely affect our profitability. Such pres-
sures could reduce our ability to take appropriate remedial action  
to address commodity and other cost increases.

Laws and regulations could adversely affect our business.

Food products are extensively regulated in most of the countries in 
which we sell our products. We are subject to numerous laws and 
regulations relating to the growing, sourcing, manufacture, storage, 
labeling, marketing, advertising and distribution of food products, as 
well as laws and regulations relating to financial reporting require-
ments, the environment, competition, anti-corruption, privacy, rela-
tions with distributors and retailers, foreign supplier verification, the 
import and export of products and product ingredients, employment, 
health and safety, and trade practices. Enforcement of existing laws 
and regulations, changes in legal requirements, and/or evolving 
interpretations of existing regulatory requirements may result in 
increased compliance costs and create other obligations, financial  
or otherwise, that could adversely affect our business, financial  

condition or operating results. Increased regulatory scrutiny of, and 
increased litigation involving, product claims and concerns regarding 
the attributes of food products and ingredients may increase compli-
ance costs and create other obligations that could adversely affect 
our business, financial condition or operating results. Governments 
may also impose requirements and restrictions that impact our  
business, such as labeling disclosures pertaining to ingredients. For 
example, “Proposition 65, the Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforce-
ment Act of 1986,” in California exposes all food companies to the 
possibility of having to provide warnings on their products in that 
state. If we were required to add warning labels to any of our prod-
ucts or place warnings in locations where our products are sold in 
order to comply with Proposition 65, the sales of those products and 
other products of our company could suffer, not only in those loca-
tions but elsewhere. These factors and others could have an adverse 
impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Our operations may be impaired as a result of disasters,  
business interruptions or similar events.

We could have an interruption in our business, loss of inventory or 
data, or be rendered unable to accept and fulfill customer orders as a 
result of a natural disaster, catastrophic event, epidemic or computer 
system failure. Natural disasters could include an earthquake, fire, 
flood, tornado or severe storm. A catastrophic event could include a 
terrorist attack. An epidemic could affect our operations, major facil-
ities or employees’ and consumers’ health. In addition, some of our 
inventory and production facilities are located in areas that are sus-
ceptible to harsh weather; a major storm, heavy snowfall or other 
similar event could prevent us from delivering products in a timely 
manner. Production of certain of our products is concentrated in a 
single manufacturing site.

We cannot provide assurance that our disaster recovery plan will 
address all of the issues we may encounter in the event of a disaster 
or other unanticipated issue, and our business interruption insurance 
may not adequately compensate us for losses that may occur from 
any of the foregoing. In the event that a natural disaster, terrorist 
attack or other catastrophic event were to destroy any part of our 
facilities or interrupt our operations for any extended period of time, 
or if harsh weather or health conditions prevent us from delivering 
products in a timely manner, our business, financial condition or 
operating results could be adversely affected.

We may not be able to successfully consummate and manage 
ongoing acquisition, joint venture and divestiture activities 
which could have an impact on our results.

From time to time, we may acquire other businesses and, based on 
an evaluation of our business portfolio, divest existing businesses. 
These acquisitions, joint ventures and divestitures may present 
financial, managerial and operational challenges, including diversion 
of management attention from existing businesses, difficulty with 
integrating or separating personnel and financial and other systems, 
increased expenses and raw material costs, assumption of unknown 
liabilities and indemnities, and potential disputes with the buyers or 
sellers. In addition, we may be required to incur asset impairment 
charges (including charges related to goodwill and other intangible 
assets) in connection with acquired businesses which may reduce 
our profitability. If we are unable to consummate such transactions,  
or successfully integrate and grow acquisitions and achieve contem-
plated revenue synergies and cost savings, our financial results 
could be adversely affected. Additionally, joint ventures inherently 

involve a lesser degree of control over business operations, thereby 
potentially increasing the financial, legal, operational and/or com-
pliance risks.

Our foreign operations are subject to additional risks.

We operate our business and market our products internationally.  
In fiscal year 2014, approximately 45% of our sales were generated 
in foreign countries. Our foreign operations are subject to additional 
risks, including fluctuations in currency values, foreign currency 
exchange controls, discriminatory fiscal policies, compliance with 
U.S. and foreign laws, enforcement of remedies in foreign jurisdic-
tions and other economic or political uncertainties. Beginning in 
2011, several countries within the European Union experienced sov-
ereign debt and credit issues. This has caused more volatility in the 
economic environment throughout the European Union. Additionally, 
international sales are subject to risks related to imposition of tariffs, 
quotas, trade barriers and other similar restrictions. All of these risks 
could result in increased costs or decreased revenues, which could 
adversely affect our profitability.

Fluctuations in foreign currency markets may negatively 
impact us.

We are exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency in the following 
main areas: cash flows related to raw material purchases; the trans-
lation of foreign currency earnings to U.S. dollars; the value of foreign 
currency investments in subsidiaries and unconsolidated affiliates 
and cash flows related to repatriation of these investments. Primary 
exposures include the U.S. dollar versus the Euro, British pound ster-
ling, Canadian dollar, Polish zloty, Australian dollar, Mexican peso, 
Chinese renminbi, Indian rupee, Thai baht and Swiss franc, as well 
as the British pound sterling versus the Euro. We routinely enter into 
foreign currency exchange contracts to facilitate managing certain  
of these foreign currency risks. However, these contracts may not 
effectively limit or eliminate our exposure to a decline in operating 
results due to foreign currency exchange changes. Therefore, we 
cannot provide assurance that future exchange rate fluctuations will 
not have a negative impact on our business, financial position or 
operating results.

Increases in interest rates may negatively impact us.

We had total outstanding short-term borrowings of $270 million at 
an average interest rate of approximately 1.3% on November 30, 
2014. Our policy is to manage our interest rate risk by entering into 
both fixed and variable rate debt arrangements. We also use inter-
est rate swaps to minimize worldwide financing cost and to achieve 
a desired mix of fixed and variable rate debt. We utilize derivative 
financial instruments to enhance our ability to manage risk, including 
interest rate exposures that exist as part of our ongoing business 
operations. We do not enter into contracts for trading purposes, nor 
are we a party to any leveraged derivative instruments. Our use of 
derivative financial instruments is monitored through regular com-
munication with senior management and the utilization of written 
guidelines. However, our use of these instruments may not effec-
tively limit or eliminate our exposure to changes in interest rates. 
Therefore, we cannot provide assurance that future interest rate 
changes will not have a material negative impact on our business, 
financial position or operating results.

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 23

The deterioration of credit and capital markets may adversely 
affect our access to sources of funding.

We rely on our revolving credit facilities, or borrowings backed by these 
facilities, to fund a portion of our seasonal working capital needs and 
other general corporate purposes. If any of the banks in the syndicates 
backing these facilities were unable to perform on its commitments, 
our liquidity could be impacted, which could adversely affect funding 
of seasonal working capital requirements. We engage in regular com-
munication with all of the banks participating in our revolving credit 
facilities. During these communications none of the banks have indi-
cated that they may be unable to perform on their commitments. In 
addition, we periodically review our banking and financing relation-
ships, considering the stability of the institutions, pricing we receive 
on services and other aspects of the relationships. Based on these 
communications and our monitoring activities, we believe the likeli-
hood of one of our banks not performing on its commitment is remote.

In addition, global capital markets have experienced volatility in the 
past that has tightened access to capital markets and other sources 
of funding, and such volatility and tightened access could reoccur in 
the future. In the event we need to access the capital markets or 
other sources of financing, there can be no assurance that we will 
be able to obtain financing on acceptable terms or within an accept-
able time. Our inability to obtain financing on acceptable terms or 
within an acceptable time period could have an adverse impact on 
our operations, financial condition and liquidity.

We face risks associated with certain pension assets  
and obligations.

We hold investments in equity and debt securities in our qualified 
defined benefit pension plans and in a rabbi trust for our U.S. non- 
qualified pension plan. Deterioration in the value of plan assets 
resulting from a general financial downturn or otherwise, or an 
increase in the actuarial valuation of the plans’ liability due to a low 
interest rate environment, could cause (or increase) an underfunded 
status of our defined benefit pension plans, thereby increasing our 
obligation to make contributions to the plans. An obligation to make 
contributions to pension plans could reduce the cash available for 
working capital and other corporate uses, and may have an adverse 
impact on our operations, financial condition and liquidity.

The global financial downturn exposes us to credit risks from 
customers and counterparties.

Consolidations in some of the industries in which our customers 
operate have created larger customers, some of which are highly 
leveraged. In addition, competition has increased with the growth  
in alternative channels through our customer base. These factors 
have caused some customers to be less profitable and increased our 
exposure to credit risk. Current credit markets are volatile, and some 
of our customers and counterparties are highly leveraged. A signifi-
cant adverse change in the financial and/or credit position of a cus-
tomer or counterparty could require us to assume greater credit risk 
relating to that customer or counterparty and could limit our ability 
to collect receivables. This could have an adverse impact on our 
financial condition and liquidity.

Our operations may be impaired if our information technology 
systems fail to perform adequately or if we are the subject of a 
data breach or cyber attack.

Our information technology systems are critically important to oper-
ating our business efficiently. We rely on our information technology 

24

systems to manage our business data, communications, supply chain, 
order entry and fulfillment, and other business processes. The failure 
of our information technology systems to perform as we anticipate 
could disrupt our business and could result in transaction errors, 
proc essing inefficiencies and the loss of sales and customers,  
causing our business and results of operations to suffer.

Furthermore, our information technology systems may be vulnerable 
to security breaches beyond our control. We invest in security tech-
nology to protect our data and business processes against risk of data 
security breaches and cyber attacks. While we believe these measures 
provide some protection against security breaches and mitigate cyber 
security risks, there can be no assurance that security breaches and 
cyber attacks will not occur. A breach or success ful attack could 
have a negative impact on our operations or business reputation.

The global nature of our business and the resolution of tax  
disputes create volatility in our effective tax rate.

As a global business, our tax rate from period to period can be 
affected by many factors, including changes in tax legislation, our 
global mix of earnings, the tax characteristics of our income, the  
timing and recognition of goodwill impairments, acquisitions and  
dispositions, adjustments to our reserves related to uncertain tax 
positions, changes in valuation allowances and the portion of the 
income of foreign subsidiaries that we expect to remit to the U.S. 
and that will be taxable.

In addition, significant judgment is required in determining our effec-
tive tax rate and in evaluating our tax positions. We establish accruals 
for certain tax contingencies when, despite the belief that our tax 
return positions are appropriately supported, the positions are 
uncertain. The tax contingency accruals are adjusted in light of 
changing facts and circumstances, such as the progress of tax audits, 
case law and emerging legislation. Our effective tax rate includes 
the impact of tax contingency accruals and changes to the accruals, 
including related interest and penalties, as considered appropriate 
by management. When particular matters arise, a number of years 
may elapse before such matters are audited and finally resolved. 
Favorable resolution of such matters could be recognized as a reduc-
tion to our effective tax rate in the year of resolution. Unfavorable 
resolution of any particular issue could increase the effective tax 
rate and may require the use of cash in the year of resolution.

Climate change may negatively affect our business, financial 
condition and results of operations.

Unseasonable or unusual weather or long-term climate changes may 
negatively impact the price or availability of spices, herbs and other 
raw materials. There is concern that greenhouse gases in the atmos-
phere may have an adverse impact on global temperatures, weather 
patterns and the frequency and severity of extreme weather and 
natural disasters. In the event that such climate change has a negative 
effect on agricultural productivity or practices, we may be subject to 
decreased availability or less favorable pricing for certain commodi-
ties that are necessary for our products.

Our intellectual property rights, and those of our customers, 
could be infringed, challenged or impaired, and reduce the value 
of our products and brands or our business with customers.

We possess intellectual property rights that are important to our 
business, and we are provided access by certain customers to par-
ticular intellectual property rights belonging to such customers. These 
intellectual property rights include ingredient formulas, trademarks, 

copyrights, patents, business processes and other trade secrets 
which are important to our business and relate to some of our prod-
ucts, our packaging, the processes for their production, and the 
design and operation of equipment used in our businesses. We pro-
tect our intellectual property rights, and those of certain customers, 
globally through a variety of means, including trademarks, copyrights, 
patents and trade secrets, third-party assignments and nondisclosure 
agreements, and monitoring of third-party misuses of intellectual 
property. If we fail to obtain or adequately protect our intellectual 
property (and the intellectual property of customers to which we 
have been given access), the value of our products and brands could 
be reduced and there could be an adverse impact on our business, 
financial condition and results of operations.

Litigation, legal or administrative proceedings could have  
an adverse impact on our business, financial condition and 
results of operations, and damage our reputation.

We are party to a variety of legal claims and proceedings in the  
ordinary course of business. Since litigation is inherently uncertain, 
there is no guarantee that we will be successful in defending our-
selves against such claims or proceedings, or that management’s 
assessment of the materiality or immateriality of these matters, 
including any reserves taken in connection with such matters, will 
be consistent with the ultimate outcome of such claims or proceed-
ings. In the event that management’s assessment of the materiality 
or immateriality of current claims and proceedings proves inaccurate, 
or litigation that is material arises in the future, there may be a mate rial 
adverse effect on our financial condition. Any adverse publicity 
resulting from allegations made in litigation claims or legal or admin-
istrative proceedings (even if untrue) may also adversely affect our 
reputation. These factors and others could have an adverse impact 
on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

Streamlining actions to reduce fixed costs, simplify or improve 
processes, and improve our competitiveness may have a  
negative effect on employee relations.

During 2014 and 2013, we evaluated changes to our organization 
structure to enable us to reduce fixed costs, simplify or improve proc-
esses, and improve our competitiveness, and we expect to continue 
such actions in the future. As a result of such fixed cost reductions 
and process simplifications or improvements, we may, from time to 
time, transfer production from one manufacturing facility to another  
or eliminate certain manufacturing, selling and administrative  
positions. These actions may result in a deterioration of employee 
relations at the impacted locations or elsewhere in McCormick.

If we are unable to fully realize the benefits from our Compre­
hensive Continuous Improvement (CCI) program, our financial 
results could be negatively affected.

Our future success depends in part on our ability to be an efficient 
producer in a highly competitive industry. Any failure by us to 
achieve our planned cost savings and efficiencies under our CCI  
program, or other similar programs, could have an adverse effect  
on our business, results of operations and financial position. 

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Our principal executive offices and primary research facilities are 
owned and are located in suburban Baltimore, Maryland.

The following is a list of our principal manufacturing properties,  
all of which are owned except for the facilities in Commerce, 
California and Melbourne, Australia, and a portion of the facility 
in Littleborough, England, which are leased:

United States:

Hunt Valley, Maryland—consumer and industrial

(3 principal plants)

Gretna, Louisiana—consumer and industrial
South Bend, Indiana—industrial and consumer
Atlanta, Georgia—industrial
Commerce, California—consumer
Irving, Texas—industrial

Canada:

London, Ontario—consumer and industrial

Mexico:

Cuautitlan de Romero Rubio—industrial

United Kingdom:

Haddenham, England—consumer and industrial
Littleborough, England—industrial

France:

Carpentras—consumer and industrial
Monteux—consumer and industrial

Poland:

Stefanowo—consumer

India:

New Dehli—consumer

Australia:

Melbourne—consumer and industrial

China:

Guangzhou—consumer and industrial
Shanghai—consumer and industrial
Wuhan—consumer

In addition to distribution facilities and warehouse space available  
at our manufacturing facilities, we lease regional distribution  
facilities in Belcamp, Maryland; Salinas, California; Irving, Texas; 
Mississauga and London, Ontario, Canada; and Genvilliers, France; 
and own distribution facilities in Monteux, France. We also own, 
lease or contract other properties used for manufacturing consumer 
and industrial products and for sales, warehousing, distribution and 
administrative functions.

We believe our plants are well maintained and suitable for their 
intended use. We further believe that these plants generally have 
adequate capacity or the ability to expand, and can accommodate 
seasonal demands, changing product mixes and additional growth.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

There are no material pending legal proceedings in which we or any 
of our subsidiaries are a party or to which any of our or their prop-
erty is the subject.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not Applicable.

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 25

PART II.

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF 
EQUITY SECURITIES

We have disclosed in note 18 of the financial statements the information relating to the market price and dividends paid on our classes of common 
stock. The market price of our common stock at the close of business on December 31, 2014 was $75.96 per share for the Common Stock and  
$74.30 per share for the Common Stock Non-Voting.

Our Common Stock and Common Stock Non-Voting are listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”). The approximate number of 
holders of our common stock based on record ownership as of December 31, 2014 was as follows:

Title of Class

Common Stock, no par value
Common Stock Non-Voting, no par value

Approximate Number 
of Record Holders

2,000
9,900

The following table summarizes our purchases of Common Stock (CS) and Common Stock Non-Voting (CSNV) during the fourth quarter of 2014:

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Period

September 1, 2014 to
September 30, 2014

October 1, 2014 to
October 31, 2014

November 1, 2014 to
November 30, 2014

Total

Total Number 
of Shares 
Purchased

CS-0
CSNV-315,000

CS-17,677
CSNV-345,000

CS-18,106
CSNV-257,376

CS-35,783
CSNV-917,376

Average 
Price 
Paid per 
Share

—
  $ 68.59

  $ 66.40
  $ 67.65

  $ 72.22
  $ 72.00

  $ 69.34
  $ 69.19

Total Number of 
Shares Purchased 
as Part of Publicly 
Announced Plans 
or Programs

—
315,000

17,677
345,000

18,106
257,376

35,783 
917,376

Approximate Dollar 
Value of Shares  
that May Yet Be 
Purchased Under the 
Plans or Programs

$160 million

$135 million

$116 million

$116 million

As of November 30, 2014, approximately $116 million remained of a $400 million share repurchase authorization approved by the Board of Directors in 
April 2013. There is no expiration date for our repurchase program. The timing and amount of any shares repurchased is determined by our man-
agement based on its evaluation of market conditions and other factors. The repurchase program may be suspended or discontinued at  
any time.

In certain circumstances, we issue shares of CS in exchange for shares of CSNV, or issue shares of CSNV in exchange for shares of CS, in either 
case pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Typically, these exchanges 
are made in connection with the administration of our employee benefit plans, executive compensation programs and dividend reinvestment/direct 
purchase plans. The number of shares issued in an exchange is generally equal to the number of shares received in the exchange, although the num-
ber may differ slightly to the extent necessary to comply with the requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. During  
fiscal 2014, we issued 801,705 shares of CSNV in exchange for shares of CS and issued 21,490 shares of CS in exchange for shares of CSNV.

26

 
 
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

HISTORICAL FINANCIAL SUMMARY

(millions except per share and percentage data)

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

For the Year
Net sales
  Percent increase
Operating income
Income from unconsolidated operations
Net income

Per Common Share
Earnings per share—basic
Earnings per share—diluted
Common dividends declared
Closing price, non-voting shares—end of year
Book value per share

At Year-End
Total assets
Current debt
Long-term debt
Shareholders’ equity

Other Financial Measures
Percentage of net sales
  Gross profit
  Operating income
Capital expenditures
Depreciation and amortization
Common share repurchases
Average shares outstanding
  Basic
  Diluted

$ 4,243.2

$ 4,123.4

$ 4,014.2

$ 3,697.6

$ 3,336.8

2.9%

2.7%

8.6%

603.0
29.4
437.9

3.37
3.34
1.51
74.33
14.10

$ 

$ 4,414.3
270.8
1,014.1
1,809.4

550.5
23.2
389.0

2.94
2.91
1.39
69.00
14.85

$ 

$ 4,449.7
214.1
1,019.0
1,947.7

578.3
21.5
407.8

3.07
3.04
1.27
64.56
12.83

$ 

$ 4,165.4
392.6
779.2
1,700.2

40.8%
14.2%

$  132.7
102.7
244.3

129.9
131.0

$ 

40.4%
13.4%
99.9
106.0
177.4

132.1
133.6

40.3%
14.4%

$  110.3
102.8
132.2

132.7
134.3

10.8%
540.3
25.4
374.2

$ 

2.82
2.79
1.15
48.70
12.17

$ 4,087.8
222.4
1,029.7
1,618.5

$ 

41.2%
14.6%
96.7
98.3
89.3

132.7
134.3

4.5%

509.8
25.5
370.2

2.79
2.75
1.06
44.01
11.00

$ 

$ 3,419.7
100.4
779.9
1,462.7

$ 

42.5%
15.3%
89.0
95.1
82.5

132.9
134.7

The historical financial summary includes the impact of certain items that affect the comparability of financial results year to year. In 2014 and 
2013, we recorded special charges related to the completion of a reorganization in EMEA and streamlining actions in the U.S. and Australian busi-
nesses. Also in 2013, we recognized a loss on voluntary pension settlement in the U.S. In 2010, we had the benefit of the reversal of a significant 
tax accrual for a closed tax year. This tax accrual was recorded in a prior period based on uncertainties about the tax aspects of transactions 
related to the reorganization of our European operations and divestment of certain of our joint ventures. The net impact of these items is reflected 
in the following table:

(millions except per share data)

Operating income
Net income
Earnings per share—diluted

$ 

2014

(5.2)
(3.7)
(0.03)

$ 

2013

(40.3)
(29.2)
(0.22)

2012

—
—
—

2011

—
—
—

2010

—
13.9
0.10

$ 

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 27

 
 
 
 
 
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF 
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial 
Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) is intended to help the 
reader understand McCormick & Company, Incorporated, our opera-
tions and our present business environment. MD&A is provided  
as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our 
Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes 
thereto contained in Item 8 of this report. We use certain non-GAAP 
information that we believe is important for purposes of comparison 
to prior periods and development of future projections and earnings 
growth prospects. This information is also used by management  
to measure the profitability of our ongoing operations and analyze 
our business performance and trends. The dollar and share informa-
tion in the charts and tables in the MD&A are in millions, except 
per share data.

McCormick is a global leader in flavor. The company manufactures, 
markets and distributes spices, seasoning mixes, condiments and 
other flavorful products to the entire food industry—retail outlets, 
food manufacturers and foodservice businesses. We manage our 
business in two operating segments, consumer and industrial, as 
described in Item 1 of this report.

Our long-term annual growth objectives are to increase sales 4% to 
6%, increase operating income 7% to 9% and increase earnings per 
share 9% to 11%. Over time, we expect to grow sales with similar 
contributions from: 1) our base business—driven by brand marketing 
support, customer intimacy and category growth; 2) product innova-
tion; and 3) acquisitions. We are fueling our investment in growth 
with cost savings from our Comprehensive Continuous Improvement 
(CCI) program, an ongoing initiative to improve productivity and 
reduce costs throughout the organization. In addition to funding 
brand marketing support, product innovation and other growth  
initiatives, our CCI program helps offset higher material costs and is 
contributing to higher operating income and earnings per share.

Our business generates strong cash flow, and we have a balanced 
use of cash. We are using our cash to fund shareholder dividends, 
with annual increases in each of the past 29 years, and to fund capi-
tal expenditures, acquisitions and share repurchases. Each year, we 
expect a combination of acquisitions and share repurchases to add 
about 2% to earnings per share growth.

In 2014, we grew net sales 3% with increases in both our consumer 
and industrial business. This rate of growth was below our long-term 
goal as a result of challenging conditions in certain parts of our busi-
ness. In the U.S., our consumer business was impacted by smaller 
competitors that have gained retail distribution. We are addressing 
this competition through accelerated innovation, increased brand 
marketing and the sharing of our analytics with retail customers to 
help optimize their sales and profitability while simultaneously increas-
ing our sales to those customers. In China, our industrial business 
was impacted by weak demand from quick service restaurants that 
related to a product quality issue from a protein supplier. We expect 
this situation to improve in 2015 as these quick service restaurants 
have addressed this issue and continue to invest in new restaurant 
locations in China. Operating income was $603.0 million in 2014. 
Excluding special charges and, in 2013, a loss on a voluntary pension 
settlement, adjusted operating income rose to $608.2 million from 

28

$590.8 million in 2013. This was an increase of 3% and below our 
long-term objective due in part to a significant increase in brand mar-
keting support and a less favorable mix of business. Diluted earnings 
per share was $3.34 in 2014. Excluding the effect of the aforemen-
tioned special charges and the 2013 loss on voluntary pension settle-
ment, adjusted diluted earnings per share was $3.37 in 2014, an 
increase of approximately 8% over adjusted diluted earnings per 
share of $3.13 in 2013. This increase was mainly driven by higher 
adjusted operating income, higher income from unconsolidated oper-
ations and our share repurchases.

McCormick continues to generate strong cash flow. Net cash pro-
vided by operating activities reached $503.6 million in 2014, an 
increase from $465.2 million in 2013. We continued to have a bal-
anced use of cash for capital expenditures, acquisitions and the 
return of cash to shareholders through dividends and share repur-
chases. In 2014, that return of cash to our shareholders was a 
record $436.7 million.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—2014 COMPARED TO 2013

Net sales

  Percent growth

Components of percent growth in  
  net sales —increase (decrease):

  Volume and product mix
  Pricing actions
  Acquisitions
  Foreign exchange

2014

2013

$4,243.2

$4,123.4

2.9%

2.7%

(0.2)%
1.9%
1.8%
(0.6)%

0.1%
1.5%
1.5%
(0.4)%

Sales for the fiscal year 2014 rose 2.9% from 2013, with growth in 
both the consumer and industrial segments. Pricing actions, taken  
in response to increased raw material and packaging costs, added 
1.9% to sales. The incremental impact of the Wuhan Asia Pacific 
Condiments (WAPC) acquisition, completed in mid-2013, accounted 
for a 1.8% increase to sales, while volume and product mix in the 
base business reduced sales 0.2%. The impact of foreign exchange 
rates was unfavorable in 2014, reducing sales by 0.6%.

In 2015, we expect to grow sales in local currency by 4% to 6% from 
2014, to include the impact of higher volume and pricing. We expect 
this range to be significantly reduced as a result of unfavorable for-
eign currency exchange rates.

Gross profit
  Gross profit margin

2014

2013

$1,730.2

$1,665.8

40.8%

40.4%

In 2014, gross profit increased 3.9% while gross profit margin rose 
40 basis points over the 2013 level to 40.8%. We offset a low single- 
digit increase in raw material and packaging costs with our pricing 
actions and CCI cost savings. Our CCI program generated cost savings 
of $65 million in 2014, of which $54 million lowered cost of goods 
sold. In 2015, we expect a favorable impact from pricing actions and 
cost savings, largely offset by a mid-single digit increase in raw 
material and packaging costs.

Selling, general & administrative  
  expense (SG&A)

  Percent of net sales

2014

2013

$1,122.0

$1,075.0

26.5%

26.1%

 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses were $1,122.0 million  
in 2014 compared to $1,075.0 million in 2013, an increase of $47.0 
million or 40 basis points as a percentage of net sales. That 40 basis 
point increase was driven by an $18.8 million increase in our brand 
marketing support from the 2013 level to $226.6 million in 2014, 
with 40% of that increase related to digital marketing, which is  
one of our highest return investments in brand marketing support. In 
addition, compared to 2013, lower pension and other postretirement 
benefit expenses in 2014 were partially offset by increased employee 
incentive compensation expenses in 2014.

Special charges
Loss on voluntary pension settlement

2014

$5.2
—

2013

$25.0
15.3

We are evaluating changes to our organization structure to enable 
us to reduce fixed costs, simplify or improve processes, and improve 
our competitiveness. Special charges of $5.2 million were recorded 
in 2014 to enable us to implement these changes. Of the $5.2 million 
of special charges recorded in 2014, which were principally related 
to employee severance, $2.1 million related to actions undertaken 
with respect to the EMEA reorganization announced in late 2013, 
$1.3 million related to the realignment of certain manufacturing 
activities in the U.S. industrial business, $1.1 million related to the 
elimination of certain administrative positions in the U.S. consumer 
and industrial businesses, and $0.7 million related to the elimination 
of certain administrative and manufacturing positions in the 
Australian consumer business.

In late 2013, we announced several reorganization activities in the 
EMEA region to further improve EMEA’s profitability and process 
standardization while supporting its competitiveness and long-term 
growth. At that time, we indicated our expectation that we would 
recognize approximately $27 million of cash and non-cash charges 
related to this plan, of which $25.0 million in special charges was  
recognized in 2013, with $15.9 million related to employee severance, 
$6.4 million for asset write-downs and $2.7 million for other exit 
costs. Total cash expenditures to implement this EMEA reorganiza-
tion plan were $10.7 million in 2014. We expect to complete the 
implementation of this plan in 2015, spending an additional $10 mil-
lion in cash in that year. See note 3 of the financial statements for 
further information with respect to special charges recorded in 2014 
and 2013.

In addition to the special charges outlined above, we recorded a 
loss on voluntary pension settlement of $15.3 million in 2013 for the 
settlement of a portion of our U.S. defined benefit obligation, which 
reduced the size of our pension obligation and should reduce poten-
tial pension volatility in the future. The settlement charge relates to 
a lump sum distribution elected by certain former U.S. employees in 
exchange for their deferred vested pension plan benefits. This lump 
sum payout program was completed in 2013. See note 10 of the 
financial statements for additional information.

Interest expense
Other income, net

2014

$49.7
1.1

2013

$53.3
2.2

Interest expense for 2014 was lower than the prior year, primarily 
due to the refinancing of long-term debt in the second half of 2013. 
In August 2013, we issued $250 million of 3.50% notes (at an  

effective interest rate of 3.30%), the net cash proceeds of which, 
plus cash on hand, were used to pay off $250 million of 5.25% 
notes (at an effective interest rate of 5.54%) that matured in 
September 2013.

Income from consolidated operations  
  before income taxes
Income taxes
  Effective tax rate

2014

2013

$554.4
145.9
26.3%

$499.4
133.6
26.8%

The effective tax rate declined 50 basis points to 26.3% in 2014 
from 26.8% in 2013, primarily as a result of the following factors: 
Discrete tax benefits were $10.8 million in 2014 compared to  
$3.9 million in 2013. That increase in 2014 is primarily due to the 
reversal of previously established reserves for unrecognized tax  
benefits, net of additional taxes provided, upon the following tax 
settlements reached during 2014: (1) a settlement with respect to 
the French taxing authority’s audits of the 2007–2013 tax years;  
and (2) a settlement with respect to the Internal Revenue Service 
(IRS) examination of our U.S. federal income tax return for the 2007 
and 2008 tax years. Discrete tax benefits in 2013 of $3.9 million 
resulted from the 2013 recognition of a 2012 U.S. research tax credit 
and reversal of valuation allowances for two subsidiaries originally 
established against net operating losses. During 2013, a new law 
was enacted that retroactively granted the research tax credit in 
2012 and allowed for a research tax credit in 2013. No research tax 
credit was recognized in 2014 as the tax law which retroactively 
granted the research tax credit for 2014 was not enacted until after 
the company’s 2014 fiscal year end. See note 12 of the financial 
statements for a reconciliation of the U.S. federal tax rate with the 
effective tax rate.

In November 2012, we deposited $18.8 million with the IRS to stop 
any potential interest on proposed adjustments associated with the 
IRS examination of our U.S. federal income tax returns for the 2007 
and 2008 tax years. In November 2014, $14.9 million of that deposit 
was refunded to us upon our settlement with the IRS.

We expect the effective tax rate in 2015 to range from 27% to 28%.

Income from unconsolidated operations

2014

$29.4

2013

$23.2

Income from unconsolidated operations rose $6.2 million in 2014 
compared to 2013, which was a 26.7% increase. This increase is 
attributable to our largest joint venture, McCormick de Mexico, which 
benefited in 2014 from its transition to a more efficient manufacturing 
facility and from lower commodity costs. 

In 2014, our 50% interest in the McCormick de Mexico joint venture 
represented 64% of the sales and 91% of the net income of our 
unconsolidated joint ventures. We own 50% of most of our other 
unconsolidated joint ventures.

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 29

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
We reported diluted earnings per share of $3.34 in 2014, compared to 
$2.91 in 2013. The following table outlines the major components of 
the change in diluted earnings per share from 2013 to 2014:

2013 Earnings per share—diluted
Impact of reduction in special charges and loss on  

voluntary pension settlement

Increase in adjusted operating income
Impact of lower shares outstanding
Increase in income from unconsolidated operations
Decrease in effective income tax rate
Lower interest expense

2014 Earnings per share—diluted

$2.91

0.19
0.09
0.07
0.04
0.02
0.02 

$3.34

We measure segment performance based on operating income 
excluding special charges and, in 2013, the loss on voluntary pen-
sion settlement as these activities are managed separately from 
the business segments.

Consumer Business

Net sales

  Percent growth

Components of percent growth in  
  net sales—increase (decrease):

  Volume and product mix
  Pricing actions
  Acquisitions
  Foreign exchange

Operating income, excluding special charges 
  and loss on voluntary pension settlement
  Operating income margin, excluding  

special charges and loss on voluntary  

2014

2013

$2,625.5

$2,538.0

3.4%

5.1%

(1.1)%
2.0%
2.9%
(0.4)%

1.0%
1.7%
2.5%
(0.1)%

$   474.3

$   472.3

  pension settlement

18.1%

18.6%

We grew sales in the consumer business 3.4% in 2014 from 2013. 
This growth rate included a 2.9% increase due to the mid-2013 acqui-
sition of WAPC and a 2.0% increase due to higher price, offset in part 
by a 1.1% decline in volume and product mix and 0.4% decline from 
unfavorable foreign exchange rates in 2014 from 2013.

In the Americas, consumer business sales declined 0.7%. Although 
higher pricing added 1.6%, a decline in volume and product mix 
reduced sales 1.6% and unfavorable foreign exchange rates reduced 
sales 0.7%. In the latter part of 2013, our sales growth was ham-
pered as smaller competitors gained category share. This competi-
tive activity persisted in 2014. Throughout 2014, we had actions 
underway to regain momentum with this part of our business that 
included additional brand marketing support, accelerated innovation 
and working with our retail customers to optimize their spices and 
seasonings and their recipe mix categories while simultaneously 
increasing sales of our products to these customers. We are making 
progress and have gained category share in 2014 in recipe mixes, 
driven in part by new grilling products, gluten-free products and liquid 
skillet sauces. In 2014, our category share of spices and seasonings 
had a further decline, although we expect better results in 2015 as 
we continue with our actions to improve the performance of our  
consumer business in the Americas.

In EMEA, consumer business sales increased 3.3%, with 2.0% added 
by pricing and 1.5% added by favorable foreign currency exchange 
rates. Volume and product mix declined slightly, reducing sales by 
0.2%. While we had success with new product introductions, 

30

increased brand marketing and distribution gains, economic conditions 
across the region remained challenging. Our innovation activity in 
2014 included the roll-out of Flavour Shots in the U.K., dessert items  
in France and additional recipe mixes in Poland. In this region, higher 
brand marketing support was devoted to building awareness and 
trial of new products, as well as digital marketing.

In the Asia/Pacific region, sales rose 31.2%. Our mid-2013 acquisition 
of WAPC added 28.2% to net sales, pricing actions added 4.0%, and 
base business volume and product mix added 2.2%, while unfavor-
able foreign currency exchange rates lowered sales 3.2%. We 
achieved a double-digit increase in our base business volume and 
product mix in China. However, crop shortages of basmati rice led to 
another year of steep increases in cost and pricing of basmati rice in 
India during 2014, and a subsequent decline in our sales volume as 
consumers turned toward lower cost rice varieties.

Consumer business operating income, excluding special charges and, 
for 2013, loss on voluntary pension settlement, rose 0.4% to $474.3 
million from $472.3 million in 2013. Higher sales and CCI cost savings 
contributed to this profit growth, but were largely offset by higher 
material costs and a $16.8 million increase in brand marketing sup-
port. Operating income margin, excluding the impact of special 
charges and the 2013 loss on voluntary pension settlement, was 
18.1% in 2014 compared to 18.6% in 2013. This reduction was due,  
in part, to the higher brand marketing support and the mix of business 
across regions, as sales in international markets grew at a faster rate 
than in the U.S., where our profit margin is higher due to larger scale 
and less complexity.

Industrial Business

Net sales

2014

2013

$1,617.7

$1,585.4

  Percent change—increase (decrease)

2.0%

(0.8)%

Components of percent change in  
  net sales—increase (decrease):

  Volume and product mix
  Pricing actions
  Foreign exchange

Operating income, excluding special charges 
  and loss on voluntary pension settlement
  Operating income margin, excluding  
  special charges and loss on voluntary  
  pension settlement

0.9%
1.8%
(0.7)%

(1.2)%
1.2%
(0.8)%

$   133.9

$   118.5

8.3%

7.5%

We grew sales for the industrial business 2.0% in 2014. Pricing 
actions taken to offset the impact of higher material costs added 
1.8% and volume and product mix added 0.9%. Unfavorable foreign 
exchange rates decreased sales 0.7%. The growth in volume and 
product mix was led by sales of snack seasonings in the Americas 
and sales to quick service restaurants in our EMEA region.

In the Americas, industrial business sales rose 0.4%. Pricing added 
1.0% and volume and product mix added 0.3% to sales, offset in 
part by unfavorable foreign currency exchange rates that lowered 
sales 0.9%. Innovation and category growth drove increased sales 
of seasonings for snack products and we also grew sales of branded 
foodservice items in 2014. However, demand from quick service 
restaurants was weak in the U.S. in 2014. This weakness is likely  
to extend into the first part of 2015.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
In EMEA, we grew industrial business sales 9.3%, with a 5.0% 
increase from pricing actions, a 3.2% increase in volume and product 
mix, and a 1.1% increase from favorable foreign exchange rates. 
Demand from quick service restaurants remained robust, and we 
met this demand with products that we supply from our facilities  
in the U.K., Turkey and South Africa.

In the Asia/Pacific region, industrial business sales declined by 
0.5%. While pricing actions added 1.0% and higher volume and 
product mix added 0.9%, unfavorable foreign exchange rates 
reduced sales 2.4%. Sales to quick service restaurants in China 
were adversely impacted by consumer concerns regarding quality 
issues from a supplier of protein in 2014 and regarding avian flu in 
2013. In 2015, we expect demand from these quick service restaurant 
customers to improve in China as they address these issues and  
continue to expand the number of restaurant locations.

Industrial business operating income, excluding special charges and, 
for 2013, loss on voluntary pension settlement, was $133.9 million 
compared to $118.5 million in 2013. Higher sales, the benefit of CCI 
cost savings and a more favorable mix of business, more than offset 
increased material costs and a $2.0 million increase in marketing 
support for branded foodservice items. Industrial business operating 
income margin, excluding the impact of special charges and the 2013 
loss on voluntary pension settlement, was 8.3% in 2014 compared 
to 7.5% in 2013.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS—2013 COMPARED TO 2012

Net sales

  Percent growth

Components of percent growth in  
  net sales —increase (decrease):

  Volume and product mix
  Pricing actions
  Acquisitions
  Foreign exchange

2013

2012

$4,123.4

$4,014.2

2.7%

8.6%

0.1%
1.5%
1.5%
(0.4)%

1.4%
4.4%
4.3%
(1.5)%

Sales for the fiscal year 2013 rose 2.7% from 2012, with growth in 
the consumer segment partially offset by a decline in the industrial 
segment. Pricing actions, taken in response to increased raw mate-
rial and packaging costs, added 1.5% to sales. The incremental 
impact of the WAPC acquisition, completed in mid-2013, accounted 
for a 1.5% increase to sales, and increased volume and product mix 
in the base business added 0.1% to sales. The impact of foreign 
exchange rates was unfavorable in 2013, reducing sales by 0.4%.

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $1,075.0 million in 
2013 compared to $1,039.5 million in 2012, an increase of $35.5 mil-
lion or 20 basis points as a percentage of net sales. Retirement bene-
fit expense increased $20.0 million in 2013 largely as a result of a 
lower interest rate environment at the November 30, 2012 pension 
measurement date which negatively impacted 2013 expense. Of the 
increase in retirement benefit expense, approximately 60% impacted 
selling, general and administrative expenses. In addition, we increased 
our brand marketing support by $9.6 million to $207.8 million in 2013, 
with about half of the increase in digital marketing, which is one of 
our highest return investments in brand marketing support.

Special charges
Loss on voluntary pension settlement

2013

$25.0
15.3

In 2013, we announced several reorganization activities in the EMEA 
region and our expectation that we would record approximately $27 
million of cash and non-cash charges related to this plan. For 2013, 
we recorded $25.0 million of special charges, with $15.9 million 
related to employee severance, $6.4 million for asset write-downs 
and $2.7 million for other exit costs. We expect to complete the 
implementation of this plan in 2015. See note 3 of the financial 
statements for additional information.

In addition to the $25.0 million in special charges outlined above, we 
recorded a loss on voluntary pension settlement of $15.3 million in 
2013 for the settlement of a portion of our U.S. defined benefit obli-
gation, which reduced the size of our pension obligation and should 
reduce potential pension volatility in the future. The settlement 
charge relates to a lump sum distribution elected by certain former 
U.S. employees in exchange for their deferred vested pension plan 
benefits. This lump sum payout program was completed in 2013.  
See note 10 of the financial statements for additional information.

Interest expense
Other income, net

2013

$53.3
2.2

2012

$54.6
2.4

Interest expense for 2013 was lower than the prior year. Most of this 
decrease is due to the impact of lower average debt balances for 
2013 compared to 2012, and was partially aided by slightly lower 
average interest rates in 2013. The higher average debt balances in 
2012 were due to the acquisitions completed late in 2011.

2013

2012

$499.4
133.6
26.8%

$526.1
139.8
26.6%

Gross profit
  Gross profit margin

2013

2012

$1,665.8

40.4%

$1,617.8

40.3%

Income from consolidated operations  
  before income taxes
Income taxes
  Effective tax rate

In 2013, gross profit increased 3.0% while gross profit margin rose 
10 basis points. We were able to offset the dollar impact of 3% 
inflation in raw material and packaging costs with our pricing 
actions and CCI cost savings. In 2013, CCI cost savings totaled  
$63 million, of which $48 million lowered cost of goods sold.

Selling, general & administrative  
  expense (SG&A)

  Percent of net sales

2013

2012

$1,075.0

26.1%

$1,039.5

25.9%

Discrete tax benefits in 2013 were $3.9 million compared to $2.0 mil-
lion in 2012. The increase in 2013 was due to the 2013 recognition of a 
2012 U.S. research tax credit and reversal of valuation allowances for 
two subsidiaries originally established against net operating losses. A 
new law was enacted in 2013 that retroactively granted the research 
tax credit in 2012.

Tax expense for 2012 benefited from U.S. foreign tax credits that 
reduced tax expense by $9.7 million due to the repatriation of $70 mil-
lion of cash from foreign subsidiaries. While no such benefit or repatri-
ation occurred in 2013, tax expense in 2013 as a percentage of pre-tax 
income approximated the 2012 level due primarily to certain favorable 

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 31

 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
items in 2013, which included the utilization of non-U.S. operating 
losses, lower state and local income taxes, and the inclusion of the 
U.S. research tax credit for 2013, as well as the increase in discrete 
tax benefits described above.

In addition, see note 12 of the financial statements for a reconciliation 
of the U.S. federal statutory tax rate with the effective tax rate.

Income from unconsolidated operations 

2013

$23.2

2012

$21.5

Income from unconsolidated operations increased $1.7 million in 
2013 compared to 2012. Most of this increase was attributable to 
our largest joint venture, McCormick de Mexico, through strong 
sales growth, along with improved performance by our Eastern 
Condiments joint venture in India.

In 2013, our McCormick de Mexico joint venture represented 63%  
of the sales and 78% of the net income of our unconsolidated  
joint ventures. 

We reported diluted earnings per share of $2.91 in 2013, compared 
to $3.04 in 2012. The following table outlines the major components 
of the change in diluted earnings per share from 2012 to 2013:

2012 Earnings per share—diluted
Impact of special charge and loss on  

voluntary pension settlement

Increase in adjusted operating income
Impact of lower shares outstanding
Increase in income from unconsolidated operations
Increase in effective income tax rate
Lower interest expense

2013 Earnings per share—diluted

$  3.04

(0.22)
0.06
0.02
0.01
(0.01)
0.01

$  2.91

We measure segment performance based on operating income 
excluding special charges and the loss on a voluntary pension  
settlement as these activities are managed separately from the 
business segments.

Consumer Business

Net sales

  Percent growth

Components of percent growth in  
  net sales—increase (decrease):

  Volume and product mix
  Pricing actions
  Acquisitions
  Foreign exchange

Operating income, excluding special charges 
  and loss on voluntary pension settlement
  Operating income margin, excluding  

special charges and loss on voluntary  

2013

2012

$2,538.0

$2,415.3

5.1%

9.8%

1.0%
1.7%
2.5%
(0.1)%

0.3%
3.7%
7.2%
(1.4)%

$   472.3

$   456.1

  pension settlement

18.6%

18.9%

We grew sales in the consumer business 5.1% in 2013 from 2012, 
which included a 2.5% increase due to the mid-2013 acquisition of 
WAPC, a 1.7% increase due to higher price, and a 1.0% increase 
from higher volumes and improved product mix. The effect of foreign 
exchange rates in 2013 from 2012 was slightly unfavorable, reducing 
sales by 0.1%.

32

In the Americas, consumer business sales rose 2.4%, with volume 
and product mix adding 1.7%, higher pricing adding 0.9% and unfa-
vorable foreign exchange rates lowering sales by 0.2%. Higher vol-
ume and product mix was the result of new product introductions 
and increased brand marketing. In 2013, our new product launches 
included grilling items, premium recipe mixes, authentic Hispanic rice 
mixes and new varieties of Lawry’s, Zatarain’s and Simply Asia 
brand products in the U.S. In Canada, we had particular success with 
gluten-free gravy mixes, introduced new grilling items and imported 
products from our business in China and affiliate in the Philippines. 
Across the Americas region, a portion of our incremental brand mar-
keting support was in support of our new products and seasonal 
events. We also increased our digital marketing activity, which 
offers a more personalized way to interact with consumers. While 
we made good progress with these growth initiatives which contrib-
uted to strong consumer demand for spices and seasonings through-
out 2013, our U.S. sales slowed in the second half of the year. During 
this period, private label and smaller competitors gained category 
share. In 2014, we had actions underway to regain momentum with 
this part of our business that include a significant increase in brand 
marketing support, accelerated innovation and improved agility in 
the marketplace.

In EMEA, consumer business sales increased 3.3%, with pricing and 
favorable foreign currency exchange rates each adding 1.3%, and 
higher volume and product mix adding 0.7%. While we had success 
with new product introductions, increased brand marketing and dis-
tribution gains, economic conditions across the region remained 
challenging. Our innovation in 2013 included the development and 
introduction of recipe mixes in France and Poland, the launch of grill-
ing items in a number of markets, and new varieties of Vahiné brand 
dessert items. As in the Americas, higher brand marketing support 
was devoted to building awareness and trial of new products and 
towards digital marketing.

In the Asia/Pacific region, sales rose 32.6%. The impact of our 2013 
acquisition of WAPC added 30.6% to net sales, pricing added 10.0%, 
base business volume and product mix declined 4.7% and unfavor-
able foreign currency exchange rates lowered sales by 3.3%. We 
achieved a double-digit increase in our base business volume and 
product mix in China. However, crop shortages of basmati rice led  
to a steep increase in cost and pricing of basmati rice in India during 
2013, and a subsequent decline in our sales volume as consumers 
turned toward lower cost rice varieties.

Consumer business operating income, excluding special charges and 
loss on voluntary pension settlement, rose to $472.3 million from 
$456.1 million in 2012, a 3.6% increase. The growth in operating 
income was the result of higher sales and CCI savings, offset, in 
part, by higher retirement benefit expense, a $6.9 million increase  
in brand marketing support, $4.3 million of transaction costs related 
to the acquisition of WAPC and higher material costs. Operating 
income margin, excluding the impact of special charges and loss  
on voluntary pension settlement, was 18.6% in 2013 compared  
to 18.9% in 2012. This reduction was due, in part, to the mix of  
business across regions, as sales in international markets grew at  
a faster rate than in the U.S., where our profit margin is higher due 
to larger scale and less complexity.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Industrial Business

Net sales

2013

2012

$1,585.4

$1,598.9

  Percent change—increase (decrease)

(0.8)%

6.8%

Components of percent change in  
  net sales—increase (decrease):

  Volume and product mix
  Pricing actions
  Foreign exchange

Operating income, excluding special charges 
  and loss on voluntary pension settlement
  Operating income margin, excluding  

special charges and loss on voluntary  

(1.2)%
1.2%
(0.8)%

3.1%
5.3%
(1.6)%

$   118.5

$   122.2

  pension settlement

7.5%

7.6%

Sales for the industrial business declined 0.8% in 2013. Pricing 
actions taken to offset the impact of higher material costs added 
1.2%, while volume and product mix lowered sales by 1.2% and  
unfavorable foreign exchange rates decreased sales 0.8%. The 
decline in volume and product mix was largely attributable to weak 
demand from quick service restaurants in the U.S. and China. In the 
U.S., sales to quick service restaurants were impacted by lower 
restaurant traffic and customer emphasis on menu items for which 
McCormick is not a leading supplier. In China, consumer concerns, 
including avian flu, led to reduced demand for poultry throughout 
most of 2013. As a leading supplier of coatings and seasonings for 
chicken, this adversely impacted our sales in 2013.

In the Americas, industrial business sales declined 1.7%. While pric-
ing added 1.2% to sales and favorable foreign currency exchange 
rates added 0.1%, lower volume and product mix reduced sales 3.0%. 
Innovation and category growth drove increased sales of seasonings 
for snack products and sales of branded foodservice items were 
steady in 2013. However, as indicated, demand from quick service 
restaurants was weak in the U.S. in 2013.

In EMEA, industrial business sales rose 1.4%, with a 3.9% increase 
in volume and product mix as well as a 2.0% increase from pricing 
actions. These increases were partially offset by unfavorable foreign 
exchange rates that reduced sales by 4.5%. Demand from quick ser-
vice restaurants remained robust, and we met this demand with 
products that we supply from our facilities in the U.K., Turkey and 
South Africa.

Industrial business sales in the Asia/Pacific region rose slightly, 
increasing by 0.2%. Higher volume and product mix added 0.6% and 
was largely offset by lower pricing of 0.1% and unfavorable foreign 
exchange rates of 0.3%. Product innovation in other parts of the 
region largely offset the weaker demand from quick service restau-
rants in China that was previously described. By the end of our fiscal 
year 2013, the situation in China had improved.

Industrial business operating income, excluding special charges and 
loss on voluntary pension settlement, was $118.5 million compared 
to $122.2 million in 2012. The benefit of CCI cost savings was more 
than offset by higher retirement benefit expense, increased material 
costs and a $2.7 million increase in marketing support for branded 
foodservice items. Industrial business operating income margin, 
excluding the impact of special charges and loss on voluntary  
pension settlement, was 7.5% in 2013 compared to 7.6% in 2012.

NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES 

The tables below include financial measures of adjusted operating 
income, adjusted net income and adjusted diluted earnings per 
share, each excluding the impact of special charges in 2014 and 
2013, and loss on voluntary pension settlement in 2013. There were  
no adjustments to 2012 financial results. These represent non-
GAAP financial measures, which are prepared as a complement to 
our financial results prepared in accordance with United States 
generally accepted accounting principles. We believe this non-GAAP 
information is important for purposes of comparison to prior periods 
and development of future projections and earnings growth pros-
pects. This information is also used by management to measure the 
profitability of our ongoing operations and analyze our business 
performance and trends.

Special charges of $5.2 million were recorded in 2014 to enable  
us to implement changes to our organization structure in order to 
reduce fixed costs, simplify or improve processes, and improve our 
competitiveness. Of the $5.2 million of special charges recorded  
in 2014, $2.1 million related to actions undertaken with respect to  
the EMEA reorganization announced in 2013, $1.3 million related  
to the realignment of manufacturing activities in the U.S. industrial 
business, and $1.1 million and $0.7 million related to the elimination 
of administrative and/or manufacturing positions in the consumer 
and industrial businesses in the U.S. and Australia, respectively.

In 2013, we recorded $25.0 million of special charges related to 
reorganization activities in the EMEA region and $15.3 million of 
loss on voluntary pension settlement related to our U.S. pension 
plan for a lump sum distribution to former employees in exchange 
for their deferred vested pension plan benefits. 

We are treating these special charges and loss on voluntary pen-
sion settlement as adjustments to our operating income, net income 
and diluted earnings per share. We are providing non-GAAP results 
that exclude the impact of these special charges and loss on volun-
tary pension settlement as it allows for a better comparison of 2014 
financial results to 2013 and 2012. See notes 3 and 10 of the finan-
cial statements for additional information on the special charges 
and the loss on voluntary pension settlement, respectively.

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 33

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
These non-GAAP measures may be considered in addition to results 
prepared in accordance with GAAP, but they should not be consid-
ered a substitute for, or superior to, GAAP results. We intend to con-
tinue to provide these non-GAAP financial measures as part of our 
future earnings discussions and, therefore, the inclusion of these 
non-GAAP financial measures will provide consistency in our finan-
cial reporting. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP measures to 
GAAP financial results is provided below.

Operating income
Impact of special charges and loss 
  on voluntary pension settlement

2014

$603.0

2013

2012

$550.5

$578.3

5.2

40.3

—

Adjusted operating income

$608.2

$590.8

$578.3

% increase versus prior year

2.9%

2.2%

7.0%

Net income
Impact of special charges and loss 
  on voluntary pension settlement

$437.9

$ 389.0

$ 407.8

3.7

29.2

—

Adjusted net income

$441.6

$ 418.2

$ 407.8

% increase versus prior year

5.6%

2.6%

9.0%

Earnings per share—diluted
Impact of special charges and loss 
  on voluntary pension settlement

$  3.34

$  2.91

$  3.04

0.03

0.22

—

Adjusted earnings  
  per share—diluted

$  3.37

$  3.13

$  3.04

% increase versus prior year

7.7%

3.0%

9.0%

In addition to the above non-GAAP measures, we use total debt  
to adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amorti-
zation (adjusted EBITDA) as a measure of leverage. We define 
adjusted EBITDA as net income plus expenses of interest, income 
taxes, depreciation and amortization, special charges and loss on 
voluntary pension settlement. Adjusted EBITDA and the ratio of total 
debt to adjusted EBITDA are both non-GAAP financial measures. 
This ratio measures our ability to repay outstanding debt obligations. 
Our target for total debt to adjusted EBITDA, excluding the temporary 
impact from acquisition activity, is 1.5 to 1.8. We believe that total 
debt to adjusted EBITDA is a meaningful metric to investors in evalu-
ating our financial leverage and may be different than the method 
used by other companies to calculate total debt to adjusted EBITDA.

The following table reconciles our adjusted EBITDA to our net income:

Net income
Special charges and loss on  

voluntary pension settlement

Depreciation and amortization
Interest expense
Income tax expense

Adjusted EBITDA

Total debt

2014

2013

2012

$  437.9

$  389.0

$  407.8

5.2
102.7
49.7
145.9

40.3
106.0
53.3
133.6

—
102.8
54.6
139.8

$   741.4

$   722.2

$   705.0

$ 1,284.9

$ 1,233.1

$ 1,171.8

Total debt/adjusted EBITDA

1.73

1.71

1.66

34

LIQUIDITY AND FINANCIAL CONDITION 

Net cash provided by  
  operating activities
Net cash used in investing activities
Net cash used in financing activities

2014

2013

2012

$  503.6
(131.6)
(348.9)

$  465.2
(239.7)
(245.9)

$  455.0
(109.0)
(324.3)

We generate strong cash flow from operations which enables us to 
fund operating projects and investments that are designed to meet 
our growth objectives, increase our dividend, fund capital projects 
and make share repurchases when appropriate. In 2015, we expect 
to continue our share repurchase activity and fund all or a portion of 
possible future acquisitions with cash flow from operations.

In the cash flow statement, the changes in operating assets and  
liabilities are presented excluding the effects of changes in foreign 
currency exchange rates, as these do not reflect actual cash flows. 
Accordingly, the amounts in the cash flow statement do not agree 
with changes in the operating assets and liabilities that are  
presented in the balance sheet.

The reported values of our assets and liabilities held in our non-U.S. 
subsidiaries and affiliates can be significantly affected by fluctua-
tions in foreign exchange rates between periods. At November 30, 
2014, the exchange rates for the Euro, British pound sterling, 
Canadian dollar, Polish zloty and Australian dollar were lower versus 
the U.S. dollar than at November 30, 2013.

Operating Cash Flow—Operating cash flow was $503.6 million in 
2014, $465.2 million in 2013 and $455.0 million in 2012. The vari-
ability between years is due in part to changes in pension contribu-
tions, which were $16.8 million in 2014, $42.7 million in 2013 and 
$104.3 million in 2012. These contributions include payments to 
unfunded plans. We did not make any contribution to our major  
U.S. pension plan in 2014 as the plan was already within our com-
pany funding guidelines. The change in inventory also had an  
impact on the variability in cash flow from operations, as it was a  
use of cash in 2014 and 2013 and a modest source of cash in 2012. 
Higher adjusted net income, which excludes the impact of special 
charges in 2014 and 2013 and the loss on voluntary pension settle-
ment in 2013, in 2014 compared to 2013 and in 2013 compared to 
2012 was also a factor in the increased cash flow from operations  
in 2014 and in 2013, respectively.

In addition to operating cash flow, we also use cash conversion cycle 
(CCC) to measure our working capital management. This metric is 
different than operating cash flow in that it uses average balances 
instead of specific point in time measures. CCC is a calculation of 
the number of days, on average, that it takes us to convert a cash 
outlay for resources, such as raw materials, to a cash inflow from 
collection of accounts receivable. Our goal is to lower our CCC  
over time. We calculate CCC as follows:

Days sales outstanding (average trade accounts receivable divided 
by average daily net sales) plus days in inventory (average inventory 
divided by average daily cost of goods sold) less days payable out-
standing (average trade accounts payable divided by average daily 
cost of goods sold plus the average daily change in inventory).

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The following table outlines our cash conversion cycle (in days) over 
the last three years:

Our dividend history over the past three years is as follows:

Cash Conversion Cycle

2014  

2013  

2012

91.4

84.8

82.1

The increase in CCC from 2013 to 2014 is mainly due to an increase in 
our days in inventory as a result of increased strategic raw material 
inventory. In the future, we expect to reduce CCC by decreasing our 
days in inventory. The increase in CCC from 2012 to 2013 is due to  
an increase in our days sales outstanding and a decrease in our days 
payable outstanding. The increase in days sales outstanding was due 
in part to a greater customer response in 2013 to our U.S. holiday 
display program, which includes extended terms, than in 2012.

Investing Cash Flow—Net cash used in investing activities was 
$131.6 million in 2014, $239.7 million in 2013 and $109.0 million in 
2012. The variability between years is principally a result of cash 
usage related to our acquisitions of businesses and joint venture 
interests, which amounted to $142.3 million in 2013. We made no 
acquisitions in either 2014 or 2012. See note 2 of the financial 
statements for further details related to the 2013 acquisition. Capital 
expenditures were $132.7 million in 2014, $99.9 million in 2013 and 
$110.3 million in 2012. We expect 2015 capital expenditures to range 
between $130 million and $140 million.

Financing Cash Flow—Net cash used in financing activities was 
$348.9 million in 2014, $245.9 million in 2013 and $324.3 million in 
2012. The variability between years is principally a result of share 
repurchase and dividend activity, described below, and of changes  
in our net borrowing activity. In 2014 and 2013, our net borrowing 
activity provided cash of $56.1 million and $66.7 million, respec-
tively. In 2013, we received net cash proceeds of $246.2 million  
from our issuance of $250 million of 3.50% notes due 2023. We 
used these net proceeds, together with cash on hand, to repay  
$250 million of maturing 5.25% notes and $1.4 million of other  
long-term debt, and we increased our net short-term borrowings by 
$71.9 million in 2013. In 2012, our net borrowing activity used cash 
of $80.5 million, due principally to a $76.6 million net reduction in 
short-term borrowings.

The following table outlines the activity in our share repurchase  
programs (in millions):

Number of shares of common stock
Dollar amount

2014  

2013  

2012

3.6
$244.3

2.7
$177.4

2.4
$132.2

As of November 30, 2014, $116 million remained of a $400 million 
share repurchase program that was authorized by our Board of 
Directors in April 2013. During the fourth quarter of 2013, we com-
pleted a previous $400 million share repurchase program that had 
been authorized in June 2010.

The common stock issued in 2014, 2013 and 2012 relates to our 
stock compensation plans.

Total dividends paid
Dividends paid per share
Percentage increase per share

2014

2013

2012

$192.4
1.48
8.8%

$179.9
1.36
9.7%

$164.7
1.24
10.7%

In November 2014, the Board of Directors approved an 8.1% increase 
in the quarterly dividend from $0.37 to $0.40 per share. During the 
past five years, dividends per share have risen at a compound annual 
rate of 9.0%.

Total debt/adjusted EBITDA

2014

1.73

2013

1.71

2012

1.66

For 2014, our total debt has increased slightly over the prior year to 
bring the ratio of total debt to adjusted EBITDA to 1.73. The increase 
was due to higher short-term borrowings to fund strategic purchases 
of inventory. The changes in our total debt to adjusted EBITDA from 
2012 to 2013 are mainly due to changes in our debt in conjunction 
with acquisition activity and the subsequent reduction of that debt. 
In 2011, we increased our debt levels to help fund our Kohinoor, Kamis 
and Kitchen Basics® acquisitions. During 2012, the debt associated 
with these acquisitions was reduced to bring our total debt to 
adjusted EBITDA within our target range of 1.5 to 1.8. For 2013, our 
EBITDA is lower due to the impact of the special charges and loss  
on voluntary pension settlement. Excluding the impact of special 
charges and loss on voluntary pension settlement, adjusted EBITDA 
for 2013 was $722.2 million and the ratio of total debt to adjusted 
EBITDA was 1.71. 

Most of our cash is in our foreign subsidiaries. We manage our 
worldwide cash requirements by considering available funds among 
the many subsidiaries through which we conduct our business and 
the cost effectiveness with which those funds can be accessed. The 
permanent repatriation of cash balances from certain of our subsid-
iaries could have adverse tax consequences; however, those bal-
ances are generally available without legal restrictions to fund 
ordinary business operations, capital projects and future acquisi-
tions. At November 30, 2014, we temporarily used $201.4 million of 
cash from our foreign subsidiaries to pay down short-term debt in 
the U.S. The average short-term borrowings outstanding for the 
years ended November 30, 2014 and 2013 were $423.7 million and 
$390.7 million, respectively. The total average debt outstanding for 
the years ended November 30, 2014 and 2013 was $1,428.7 million 
and $1,395.7 million, respectively.

In November 2012 and in April and August 2013, we entered into a 
total of $175 million of forward-starting interest rate swap and 
Treasury rate lock agreements to manage our interest rate risk asso-
ciated with the anticipated issuance of fixed rate notes in August 
2013. We cash settled all of these agreements, which were desig-
nated as cash flow hedges, for a gain of $9.0 million simultaneous 
with the issuance of the notes at an all-in effective fixed rate of 
3.30% on the full $250 million of debt. The gain on these agree-
ments is deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income and 
will be amortized to reduce interest expense over the life of the notes. 
Hedge ineffectiveness of these agreements was not material.

See notes 6 and 7 of the financial statements for further details of 
these transactions.

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 35

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Credit and Capital Markets—Global credit and capital markets  
continued to improve in 2014. The following summarizes the more 
significant impacts of credit and capital markets on our business:

CREDIT FACILITIES—Cash flows from operating activities are our 
primary source of liquidity for funding growth, share repurchases, 
dividends and capital expenditures. We also rely on our revolving 
credit facility, or borrowings backed by this facility, to fund seasonal 
working capital needs and other general corporate requirements.

Our major revolving credit facility has a total committed capacity of 
$600 million, which expires in 2016. We generally use this facility to 
support our issuance of commercial paper. If the commercial paper 
market is not available or viable, we could borrow directly under our 
revolving credit facility. The facility is made available by a syndicate 
of banks, with various commitments per bank. If any of the banks  
in this syndicate are unable to perform on their commitments, our 
liquidity could be impacted, which could reduce our ability to grow 
through funding of seasonal working capital. In addition to our com-
mitted revolving credit facility, we have uncommitted credit facilities 
for $125.4 million as of November 30, 2014, that will expire in 2015. 
We engage in regular communication with all of the banks partici-
pating in our credit facilities. During these communications, none of 
the banks have indicated that they may be unable to perform on their 
commitments. In addition, we periodically review our banking and 
financing relationships, considering the stability of the institutions 
and other aspects of the relationships. Based on these communica-
tions and our monitoring activities, we believe our banks will per-
form on their commitments. See also note 6 of the financial statements 
for more details on our financing arrangements. We believe that our 
internally generated funds and the existing sources of liquidity under 
our credit facilities are sufficient to fund ongoing operations.

PENSION ASSETS AND OTHER INVESTMENTS—We hold 
investments in equity and debt securities in both our qualified 
defined benefit pension plans and through a rabbi trust for our non-
qualified defined benefit pension plan. Cash payments to pension 
plans, including unfunded plans, were $16.8 million in 2014, $42.7 
million in 2013 and $104.3 million in 2012. Our cash contributions in 
2012 included a $35 million contribution made late in that fiscal year 
to bring the pension plan’s funding status within our company guide-
lines. It is expected that the 2015 total pension plan contributions 
will be approximately $16 million primarily for international plans. 
Future increases or decreases in pension liabilities and required cash 
contributions are highly dependent on changes in interest rates and 
the actual return on plan assets. We base our investment of plan 
assets, in part, on the duration of each plan’s liabilities. Across all  
of our qualified defined benefit pension plans, approximately 66% of 
assets are invested in equities, 25% in fixed income investments 
and 9% in other investments. Assets in the rabbi trust are primarily 
invested in corporate-owned life insurance, the value of which 
approximates an investment mix of approximately 50% in equities 
and 50% in fixed income investments. See also note 10 of the finan-
cial statements, which provides details on our pension funding.

CUSTOMERS AND COUNTERPARTIES—See the subsequent  
section of this discussion under Market Risk Sensitivity—Credit Risk.

36

ACQUISITIONS

Acquisitions are part of our strategy to increase sales and profits. 
We have a particular interest in emerging markets.

In 2013, we purchased the assets of Wuhan Asia-Pacific Condiments 
Co. Ltd. (WAPC), a privately held company based in China, for $144.8 
million, which included $142.3 million of cash paid, net of closing 
adjustments, and the assumption of $2.5 million of liabilities. The 
acquisition was financed with a combination of cash and debt. 
WAPC, included in our consumer business segment, manufactures 
and markets DaQiao and ChuShiLe® brand bouillon products, which 
have a leading position in the central region of China.

See note 2 of the financial statements for further details of  
this acquisition.

PERFORMANCE GRAPH—SHAREHOLDER RETURN

Below is a line graph comparing the yearly change in McCormick’s 
cumulative total shareholder return (stock price appreciation plus 
reinvestment of dividends) on McCormick’s Non-Voting Common 
Stock with (1) the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poor’s 
500 Stock Price Index, assuming reinvestment of dividends, and (2) 
the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poor’s Packaged Foods 
& Meats Index, assuming reinvestment of dividends.

COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN* 
Among McCormick & Co., Inc., the S&P 500 Index  
and the S&P Packaged Foods & Meats Index 

$250 

$200 

$150 

$100 

$50 

$0 

11/09 

11/10 

11/11 

11/12 

11/13 

11/14 

McCormick & Co., Inc. 

S&P 500 

S&P Packaged Foods & Meats 

*$100 invested on 11/30/09 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. 
Fiscal year ending November 30.
*$100 invested on 11/30/09 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. 
Fiscal year ending November 30. 

Copyright © 2014 S&P, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Copyright© 2014 S&P, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved. 

MARKET RISK SENSITIVITY 

We utilize derivative financial instruments to enhance our ability to 
manage risk, including foreign exchange and interest rate exposures, 
which exist as part of our ongoing business operations. We do not 
enter into contracts for trading purposes, nor are we a party to any 
leveraged derivative instrument. The use of derivative financial 
instruments is monitored through regular communication with senior 
management and the utilization of written guidelines. The informa-
tion presented below should be read in conjunction with notes 6  
and 7 of the financial statements.

Graph produced by Research Data Group, Inc.

12/2/2014

Foreign Exchange Risk—We are exposed to fluctuations in foreign 
currency in the following main areas: cash flows related to raw 
material purchases; the translation of foreign currency earnings to 
U.S. dollars; the value of foreign currency investments in subsidiaries 
and unconsolidated affiliates and cash flows related to repatriation 
of these investments. Primary exposures include the U.S. dollar  
versus the Euro, British pound sterling, Canadian dollar, Polish zloty, 
Australian dollar, Mexican peso, Chinese renminbi, Indian rupee,  
Thai baht and Swiss franc, as well as the British pound sterling versus 
the Euro. We routinely enter into foreign currency exchange contracts 
to manage certain of these foreign currency risks.

During 2014, the foreign currency translation component in other 
comprehensive income was principally related to the impact of 
exchange rate fluctuations on our net investments in France, the 
U.K., Poland, Canada and Australia. We did not hedge our net  
investments in subsidiaries and unconsolidated affiliates.

The following table summarizes the foreign currency exchange  
contracts held at November 30, 2014. All contracts are valued in 
U.S. dollars using year-end 2014 exchange rates and have been  
designated as hedges of foreign currency transactional exposures, 
firm commitments or anticipated transactions.

FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE CONTRACTS AT 
NOVEMBER 30, 2014

Currency sold

Currency received

Euro
U.S. dollar
British pound sterling U.S. dollar
U.S. dollar
Canadian dollar
U.S. dollar
Australian dollar
U.S. dollar
Polish zloty
Canadian dollar
U.S. dollar
Euro
U.S. dollar
British pound sterling
U.S. dollar
U.S. dollar
Mexican peso
British pound sterling  Euro

Notional 
value

Average 
contractual 
exchange rate

$22.5
11.7
35.8
3.3
9.5
59.5
28.0
39.1
14.4
26.2

1.27
1.68
0.93
0.91
3.19
0.89
1.25
1.57
13.67
0.80

Fair 
value

$0.4
0.9
2.1
0.2
0.5
(1.0)
(0.1)
(0.2)
0.3
—

We have a number of smaller contracts with an aggregate notional value of $12.7 mil-
lion to purchase or sell other currencies, such as the Swiss franc and the Thai baht, as 
of November 30, 2014. The aggregate fair value of these contracts was $0.4 million at 
November 30, 2014.

Included in the table above are $127.1 million notional value of contracts that have 
durations of less than seven days that are used to hedge short-term cash flow funding. 
Remaining contracts have durations of one to 12 months.

At November 30, 2013, we had foreign currency exchange contracts for the Euro, 
British pound sterling, Canadian dollar, Australian dollar and Polish zloty with a 
notional value of $204.9 million, all of which matured in 2014. The aggregate fair value 
of these contracts was $(0.5) million at November 30, 2013.

Interest Rate Risk—Our policy is to manage interest rate risk by entering into both fixed and variable rate debt arrangements. We also use interest 
rate swaps to minimize worldwide financing costs and to achieve a desired mix of fixed and variable rate debt. The table that follows provides 
principal cash flows and related interest rates, excluding the effect of interest rate swaps and the amortization of any discounts or fees, by fiscal 
year of maturity at November 30, 2014. For foreign currency-denominated debt, the information is presented in U.S. dollar equivalents. Variable 
interest rates are based on the weighted-average rates of the portfolio at the end of the year presented.

YEAR OF MATURITY AT NOVEMBER 30, 2014

Debt 
Fixed rate
  Average interest rate

Variable rate
  Average interest rate

2015

2016

2017

2018

Thereafter

Total

Fair value

$  0.9

6.90%

$ 269.9

1.28%

$ 200.2

5.21%

$  0.4

8.79%

$  0.2

11.94%

$  0.5

8.79%

$ 250.2

5.76%

$  0.5

8.79%

$556.3

4.14%

$    4.0

8.79%

$1,007.8
—

$  275.3
—

$1,103.3
—

$   275.3
—

The table above displays the debt by the terms of the original debt instrument without consideration of fair value, interest rate swaps and any loan discounts or origination fees. Interest rate 
swaps have the following effects. The fixed interest rate on $100 million of the 5.20% notes due in December 2015 is effectively converted to a variable rate by interest rate swaps through 
2015. Net interest payments are based on 3 month LIBOR minus 0.05% during this period. We issued $250 million of 5.75% notes due in December 2017 in December 2007. Forward treasury 
lock agreements of $150 million were settled upon the issuance of these notes and effectively fixed the interest rate on the full $250 million of notes at a weighted-average fixed rate of 6.25%. 
We issued $250 million of 3.90% notes due in 2021 in July 2011. Forward treasury lock agreements of $200 million were settled upon the issuance of these notes and effectively fixed 
the interest rate on the full $250 million of notes at a weighted-average fixed rate of 4.01%. We issued $250 million of 3.50% notes due in 2023 in August 2013. Forward treasury lock 
agreements of $175 million were settled upon the issuance of these notes and effectively fixed the interest rate on the full $250 million of notes at a weighted-average fixed rate of 3.30%.

Commodity Risk—We purchase certain raw materials which are subject to price volatility caused by weather, market conditions, growing and har-
vesting conditions, governmental actions and other factors beyond our control. In 2014, our most significant raw materials were pepper, dairy 
products, rice, capsicums (red peppers and paprika), onion, garlic and wheat flour. While future movements of raw material costs are uncertain, 
we respond to this volatility in a number of ways, including strategic raw material purchases, purchases of raw material for future delivery and 
customer price adjustments. We generally have not used derivatives to manage the volatility related to this risk. To the extent that we have used 
derivatives for this purpose, it has not been material to our business.

Credit Risk—The customers of our consumer business are predominantly food retailers and food wholesalers. Consolidations in these industries 
have created larger customers. In addition, competition has increased with the growth in alternative channels including mass merchandisers, dollar 
stores, warehouse clubs and discount chains. This has caused some customers to be less profitable and increased our exposure to credit risk. Some 
of our customers and counterparties are highly leveraged. We continue to closely monitor the credit worthiness of our customers and counterparties. 
We feel that the allowance for doubtful accounts properly recognizes trade receivables at realizable value. We consider nonperformance credit risk 
for other financial instruments to be insignificant.

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 37

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMERCIAL COMMITMENTS 

The following table reflects a summary of our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of November 30, 2014:

CONTRACTUAL CASH OBLIGATIONS DUE BY YEAR 

Short-term borrowings
Long-term debt
Operating leases
Interest payments
Raw material purchase obligations (a)
Other purchase obligations (b)

Total contractual cash obligations

Total

$  269.6
1,013.5
92.3
252.7
377.0
16.7

$2,021.8

Less than 
1 year

$269.6
1.2
23.4
43.2
377.0
16.7

$731.1

1–3 
years

—
$201.3
31.5
78.1
—
—

$310.9

3–5 
years

—
$251.5
19.8
53.7
—
—

$325.0

More than 
5 years

—
$559.5
17.6
77.7
—
—

$654.8

(a)  Raw material purchase obligations outstanding as of year-end may not be indicative of outstanding obligations throughout the year due to our response to varying raw  

material cycles.

(b) Other purchase obligations primarily consist of advertising media commitments and electricity contracts.

Pension and postretirement funding can vary significantly each year due to changes in legislation, our significant assumptions and investment 
return on plan assets. As a result, we have not presented pension and postretirement funding in the table above.

COMMERCIAL COMMITMENTS EXPIRATION BY YEAR 

Guarantees
Standby letters of credit

Total commercial commitments

Total

$0.6
8.1

$8.7

Less than 
1 year

$0.6
8.1

$8.7

1–3 
years

—
—

—

3–5 
years

—
—

—

More than 
5 years

—
—

—

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS 

We had no off-balance sheet arrangements as of November 30, 2014 and 2013.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS 

New accounting pronouncements are issued periodically that affect our current and future operations. See note 1 of the financial statements for 
further details of these impacts.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND ASSUMPTIONS 

In preparing the financial statements, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that have an impact on the assets, liabilities, revenues 
and expenses reported. These estimates can also affect supplemental information disclosed by us, including information about contingencies,  
risk and financial condition. We believe, given current facts and circumstances, our estimates and assumptions are reasonable, adhere to U.S. GAAP 
and are consistently applied. Inherent in the nature of an estimate or assumption is the fact that actual results may differ from estimates, and 
estimates may vary as new facts and circumstances arise. In preparing the financial statements, we make routine estimates and judgments in 
determining the net realizable value of accounts receivable, inventory, fixed assets and prepaid allowances. Our most critical accounting estimates 
and assumptions are in the following areas:

Customer Contracts
In several of our major geographic markets, the consumer business sells our products by entering into annual or multi-year customer contracts. 
These contracts include provisions for items such as sales discounts, marketing allowances and performance incentives. These items are recognized 
based on certain estimated criteria such as sales volume of indirect customers, customers reaching anticipated volume thresholds and marketing 
spending. We routinely review these criteria and make adjustments as facts and circumstances change.

Goodwill and Intangible Asset Valuation 
We review the carrying value of goodwill and non-amortizable intangible assets and conduct tests of impairment on an annual basis as 
described below. We also test for impairment if events or circumstances indicate it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is 
below its carrying amount. We test indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset 
might be impaired.

Determining the fair value of a reporting unit or an indefinite-lived purchased intangible asset is judgmental in nature and involves the use of  
significant estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions include revenue growth rates and operating margins used to calculate 
projected future cash flows, risk-adjusted discount rates, assumed royalty rates, future economic and market conditions and determination of 

38

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
appropriate market comparables. We base our fair value estimates 
on assumptions we believe to be reasonable but that are inherently 
uncertain. Actual future results may differ from those estimates.

Goodwill Impairment 
Our reporting units are the same as our operating segments. We cal-
culate fair value of a reporting unit by using a discounted cash flow 
model. Our discounted cash flow model calculates fair value by pres-
ent valuing future expected cash flows of our reporting units using 
our internal cost of capital as the discount rate. We then compare 
this fair value to the carrying amount of the reporting unit, including 
intangible assets and goodwill. If the carrying amount of the report-
ing unit exceeds the calculated fair value, then we would determine 
the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill. An impairment 
charge would be recognized to the extent the carrying amount of 
goodwill exceeds the implied fair value. As of November 30, 2014, 
we had $1,722.2 million of goodwill recorded in our balance sheet 
($1,581.1 million in the consumer segment and $141.1 million in the 
industrial segment). Our testing indicates that the current fair values 
of our reporting units are significantly in excess of carrying values. 
Accordingly we believe that only significant changes in the cash 
flow assumptions would result in an impairment of goodwill.

Indefinite-lived Intangible Asset Impairment 
Our indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of brand names and 
trademarks. We calculate fair value by using a relief-from-royalty 
method or discounted cash flow model and then compare that to  
the carrying amount of the indefinite-lived intangible asset. As of 
November 30, 2014, we had $270.8 million of brand name assets 
and trademarks recorded in our balance sheet and none of the bal-
ances exceed their calculated fair values. At November 30, 2014,  
the percentage excess of calculated fair value over book value of  
our major brand names and trademarks ranges from a low of 8% to 
a high of over 70%. While we believe that it is reasonably possible 
that, in the event of an increase in discount rates and/or a decline  
in forecasted revenues, a non-cash impairment charge may be 
required, we do not believe that the amount of such an impairment 
charge would be significant. At November 30, 2014, a hypothetical 
15% reduction in the calculated fair values of our major brand names 
and trademarks would result in an impairment charge for only one of 
our major brand names and trademarks and that impairment charge 
would be approximately $1.5 million. We intend to continue to sup-
port our brand names and trademarks.

Below is a table which outlines the book value of our major brand 
names and trademarks as of November 30, 2014:

Zatarain’s
Lawry’s 
Kamis
DaQiao/ChuShiLe
Kohinoor
Simply Asia/Thai Kitchen
Other

Total

$106.4
48.0
37.5
28.4
18.8
18.6
13.1

$270.8

Income Taxes 
We estimate income taxes and file tax returns in each of the taxing 
jurisdictions in which we operate and are required to file a tax return. 
At the end of each year, an estimate for income taxes is recorded in 
the financial statements. Tax returns are generally filed in the third  
or fourth quarter of the subsequent year. A reconciliation of the esti-
mate to the final tax return is done at that time which will result in 
changes to the original estimate. We believe that our tax return 
positions are appropriately supported, but tax authorities may chal-
lenge certain positions. We evaluate our uncertain tax positions in 
accordance with the U.S. GAAP guidance for uncertainty in income 
taxes. We believe that our reserve for uncertain tax positions, 
including related interest, is adequate. The amounts ultimately paid 
upon resolution of audits could be materially different from the 
amounts previously included in our income tax expense and, there-
fore, could have a material impact on our tax provision, net income 
and cash flows. We have recorded valuation allowances to reduce 
our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to 
be realized. In doing so, we have considered future taxable income 
and tax planning strategies in assessing the need for a valuation 
allowance. Both future taxable income and tax planning strategies 
include a number of estimates.

Pension and Postretirement Benefits 
Pension and other postretirement plans’ costs require the use of 
assumptions for discount rates, investment returns, projected salary 
increases, mortality rates and health care cost trend rates. The actu-
arial assumptions used in our pension and postretirement benefit 
reporting are reviewed annually and compared with external bench-
marks to ensure that they appropriately account for our future pen-
sion and postretirement benefit obligations. While we believe that 
the assumptions used are appropriate, differences between assumed 
and actual experience may affect our operating results. A 1% 
increase or decrease in the actuarial assumption for the discount rate 
would impact 2015 pension and postretirement benefit expense by 
approximately $17 million. A 1% increase or decrease in the expected 
return on plan assets would impact 2015 pension expense by approxi-
mately $8 million. 

Assumptions as to mortality of the participants in our pension plan  
is a key estimate in measuring the expected payments a participant 
may receive over their lifetime and therefore the amount of expense 
we will recognize. During 2014, the Society of Actuaries released a 
series of updated mortality tables resulting from recent studies con-
ducted by them measuring mortality rates for various groups of individ-
uals. The updated mortality tables released in 2014 reflect improved 
trends in longevity and therefore have the effect of increasing the 
estimate of benefits to be received by plan participants.

In determining the most appropriate mortality assumptions for our 
U.S. defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans 
at November 30, 2014, we considered the updated mortality tables 
issued by the Society of Actuaries, coupled with other mortality 
information available from the Social Security Administration and 
our consulting actuaries that we believe is more closely aligned with 
our industry and participant mix to develop assumptions that we 
believe are most representative of the various characteristics of our 
participant populations.

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 39

 
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES 
ABOUT MARKET RISK

This information is set forth in the “Market Risk Sensitivity” section 
of “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” and in note 7 of the 
financial statements.

The use of these updated mortality assumptions increased the bene-
fit obligation for our U.S. defined benefit pension and other post-
retirement benefit plans by approximately $18 million at November 30, 
2014 and will have the effect of increasing related expense by 
approximately $2 million in 2015. We will continue to evaluate the 
appropriateness of mortality and other assumptions used in the 
measurement of our pension obligations. In addition, see the pre-
ceding sections of MD&A and note 10 of the financial statements 
for a discussion of these assumptions and the effects on the finan-
cial statements.

Stock-Based Compensation 
We estimate the fair value of our stock-based compensation using 
fair value pricing models which require the use of significant assump-
tions for expected volatility of stock, dividend yield and risk-free 
interest rate. Our valuation methodology and significant assumptions 
used are disclosed in note 11 of the financial statements.

40

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

REPORT OF MANAGEMENT

We are responsible for the preparation and integrity of the consoli-
dated financial statements appearing in our Annual Report. The con-
solidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with 
United States generally accepted accounting principles and include 
amounts based on our estimates and judgments. All other financial 
information in this report has been presented on a basis consistent 
with the information included in the financial statements.

We are also responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate 
internal control over financial reporting. We maintain a system of 
internal control that is designed to provide reasonable assurance  
as to the fair and reliable preparation and presentation of the con-
solidated financial statements, as well as to safeguard assets from 
unauthorized use or disposition.

Our control environment is the foundation for our system of internal 
control over financial reporting and is embodied in our Business 
Ethics Policy. It sets the tone of our organization and includes factors 
such as integrity and ethical values. Our internal control over finan-
cial reporting is supported by formal policies and procedures which 
are reviewed, modified and improved as changes occur in business 
conditions and operations.

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, which is composed 
solely of independent directors, meets periodically with members  
of management, the internal auditors and the independent regis-
tered public accounting firm to review and discuss internal control 
over financial reporting and accounting and financial reporting mat-
ters. The independent registered public accounting firm and internal 
auditors report to the Audit Committee and accordingly have full and 
free access to the Audit Committee at any time.

We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal  
control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal 
Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Spon-
soring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework). 
This evaluation included review of the documentation of controls, 
evaluation of the design effectiveness of controls, testing of the 
operating effectiveness of controls and a conclusion on this eval-
uation. Although there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness 
of any system of internal control over financial reporting, based on 
our evaluation, we have concluded with reasonable assurance that 
our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of 
November 30, 2014.

Our internal control over financial reporting as of November 30, 2014 
has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP.

Alan D. Wilson 

 Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

Gordon M. Stetz, Jr. 

 Executive Vice President &  
Chief Financial Officer

Christina M. McMullen 

 Vice President & Controller
Chief Accounting Officer

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 41

 
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of  
McCormick & Company, Incorporated

We have audited McCormick & Company, Incorporated’s internal 
control over financial reporting as of November 30, 2014, based on 
criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued 
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway 
Commission (1992 framework) (the COSO criteria). McCormick & 
Company, Incorporated’s management is responsible for maintaining 
effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assess-
ment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting 
included in the accompanying Report of Management. Our responsi-
bility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over 
financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the 
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those 
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain rea-
sonable assurance about whether effective internal control over 
financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit 
included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial 
reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing 
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal 
control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other pro-
cedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe 
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process 
designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of 
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for 
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting 
principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting 
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the main-
tenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly 

reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; 
(2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as 
necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance 
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and 
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance 
with authorizations of management and directors of the company; 
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely 
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the com-
pany’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial 
statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial 
reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections 
of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to 
the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes  
in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or 
procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, McCormick & Company, Incorporated maintained, in 
all material respects, effective internal control over financial report-
ing as of November 30, 2014, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the  
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the  
consolidated balance sheets of McCormick & Company, Incorporated 
as of November 30, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated 
income statements, statements of comprehensive income, statements 
of shareholders’ equity and cash flow statements for each of the 
three years in the period ended November 30, 2014 and our report 
dated January 29, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Baltimore, Maryland
January 29, 2015

42

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Consolidated Financial Statements

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of  
McCormick & Company, Incorporated

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of 
McCormick & Company, Incorporated as of November 30, 2014 and 
2013, and the related consolidated income statements, statements 
of comprehensive income, statements of shareholders’ equity and 
cash flow statements for each of the three years in the period ended 
November 30, 2014. Our audits also included the financial statement 
schedule listed in the Index at Item 15(2). These financial statements 
and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. 
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial state-
ments and schedule based on our audits.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present 
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position  
of McCormick & Company, Incorporated at November 30, 2014 and 
2013, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash 
flows for each of the three years in the period ended November 30, 
2014, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting princi-
ples. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, 
when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken 
as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information 
set forth therein.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the 
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those 
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain rea-
sonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free 
of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test 
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the finan-
cial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting 
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as 
well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We 
believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public 
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), McCormick  
& Company, Incorporated’s internal control over financial reporting 
as of November 30, 2014, based on criteria established in Internal 
Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Spon-
soring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) 
and our report dated January 29, 2015 expressed an unqualified 
opinion thereon.

Baltimore, Maryland
January 29, 2015

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 43

CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT

for the year ended November 30 (millions except per share data)

Net sales
  Cost of goods sold

Gross profit
  Selling, general and administrative expense
  Special charges
  Loss on voluntary pension settlement

Operating income

Interest expense
  Other income, net

Income from consolidated operations before income taxes

Income taxes

Net income from consolidated operations
Income from unconsolidated operations

Net income

Earnings per share—basic
Earnings per share—diluted

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

for the year ended November 30 (millions)

Net income
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest
Other comprehensive income (loss):
  Unrealized components of pension and other postretirement plans
  Currency translation adjustments
  Change in derivative financial instruments
  Deferred taxes

  Total other comprehensive income (loss)

Comprehensive income

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

2014

$ 4,243.2
2,513.0

1,730.2
1,122.0
5.2
—

603.0
49.7
1.1

554.4
145.9

408.5
29.4

$  437.9

$ 
$ 

3.37
3.34

2014

$  437.9
2.5

(89.0)
(134.1)
5.7
31.2

(186.2)

2013

$ 4,123.4
2,457.6

1,665.8
1,075.0
25.0
15.3

550.5
53.3
2.2

499.4
133.6

365.8
23.2

$  389.0

$ 
$ 

2.94
2.91

2013

$  389.0
1.3

235.6
(3.5)
11.8
(87.1)

156.8

2012

$ 4,014.2
2,396.4

1,617.8
1,039.5
—
—

578.3
54.6
2.4

526.1
139.8

386.3
21.5

$  407.8

$ 
$ 

3.07
3.04

2012

$  407.8
1.9

(126.9)
(15.5)
(2.4)
43.0

(101.8)

$  254.2

$  547.1

$  307.9

44

 
 
 
 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

at November 30 (millions)

Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade accounts receivable, less allowances of $4.0 for 2014 and $4.1 for 2013
Inventories
Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  Total current assets

Property, plant and equipment, net
Goodwill
Intangible assets, net
Investments and other assets

  Total assets

Liabilities
Short-term borrowings
Current portion of long-term debt
Trade accounts payable
Other accrued liabilities

  Total current liabilities

Long-term debt
Other long-term liabilities

  Total liabilities

Shareholders’ equity
Common stock, no par value; authorized 320.0 shares; issued and outstanding:  
  2014—12.0 shares, 2013—12.1 shares
Common stock non-voting, no par value; authorized 320.0 shares; issued and outstanding:  
  2014—116.4 shares, 2013—119.0 shares
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Non-controlling interests

  Total shareholders’ equity

  Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

2014

2013

$ 

77.3
493.6
713.8
131.5

1,416.2

602.7
1,722.2
330.8
342.4

$ 

63.0
495.5
676.9
134.8

1,370.2

576.6
1,798.5
333.4
371.0

$ 4,414.3

$ 4,449.7

$  269.6
1.2
372.1
479.1

1,122.0

1,014.1
468.8

2,604.9

367.2

628.4
982.6
(186.0)
17.2

1,809.4

$ 4,414.3

$  211.6
2.5
387.3
461.7

1,063.1

1,019.0
419.9

2,502.0

352.8

609.6
970.4
(0.3)
15.2

1,947.7

$ 4,449.7

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 45

 
 
 
 
 
 
CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT

for the year ended November 30 (millions)

Operating activities
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
  Depreciation and amortization
  Stock-based compensation
  Special charges
  Loss on voluntary pension settlement
  Loss on sale of assets
  Deferred income taxes

Income from unconsolidated operations
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
  Trade accounts receivable

Inventories

  Trade accounts payable
  Other assets and liabilities
Dividends received from unconsolidated affiliates

  Net cash provided by operating activities

Investing activities
Acquisitions of businesses and joint venture interests
Capital expenditures
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment

  Net cash used in investing activities

Financing activities
Short-term borrowings, net
Long-term debt borrowings
Long-term debt repayments
Proceeds from exercised stock options
Common stock acquired by purchase
Dividends paid

  Net cash used in financing activities

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

2014

2013

2012

$  437.9

$  389.0

$  407.8

102.7
18.2
5.2
—
1.3
6.1
(29.4)

(16.4)
(54.4)
(6.7)
23.3
15.8

503.6

—
(132.7)
1.1

(131.6)

57.7
—
(1.6)
31.7
(244.3)
(192.4)

(348.9)

(8.8)
14.3
63.0

106.0
18.7
25.0
15.3
0.3
(15.3)
(23.2)

(29.2)
(59.9)
12.1
21.8
4.6

465.2

(142.3)
(99.9)
2.5

(239.7)

71.9
246.2
(251.4)
44.7
(177.4)
(179.9)

(245.9)

4.4
(16.0)
79.0

102.8
20.2
—
—
0.8
24.3
(21.5)

(38.8)
1.2
8.2
(65.6)
15.6

455.0

—
(110.3)
1.3

(109.0)

(76.6)
0.8
(4.7)
53.1
(132.2)
(164.7)

(324.3)

3.4
25.1
53.9

$  77.3

$  63.0

$  79.0

46

 
 
Common 
Stock 
Amount

Retained 
Earnings

Accumulated 
Other 
Comprehensive 
(Loss) Income

Non-controlling 
Interests

Total 
Shareholders’ 
Equity

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(millions)

Balance, November 30, 2011
Net income
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
Dividends
Dividends attributable to non-controlling interest
Stock-based compensation
Shares purchased and retired
Shares issued, including tax benefit of $13.3
Equal exchange

Balance, November 30, 2012
Net income
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
Dividends
Dividends attributable to non-controlling interest
Stock-based compensation
Shares purchased and retired
Shares issued, including tax benefit of $12.6
Equal exchange

Common 
Stock 
Shares

Common 
Stock Non-
Voting 
Shares

12.4

120.5

(0.6)
2.0
(1.4)

(2.4)
0.6
1.4

12.4

120.1

(0.3)
1.1
(1.1)

(2.5)
0.3
1.1

$821.9

$  838.8
— 407.8
—
—
—
—
— (168.4)
—
—
—
20.2
(143.6)
(25.5)
—
91.6
—
—

$908.2

$  934.6
— 389.0
—
—
—
—
— (183.3)
—
—
—
18.7
(169.9)
(19.5)
—
55.0
—
—

$  (59.0)
—
—
(100.9)
—
—
—
—
—
—

$(159.9)
—
—
159.6
—
—
—
—
—
—

Balance, November 30, 2013

12.1

119.0

$962.4

$  970.4

$    (0.3)

Net income
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
Dividends
Stock-based compensation
Shares purchased and retired
Shares issued, including tax benefit of $9.0
Equal exchange

— 437.9
—
—
—
—
— (195.2)

18.2
(25.3)
40.3
—

—
(230.5)
—
—

—
—
(185.7)
—
— 
—
—
—

(0.2)
0.8
(0.7)

(3.5)
0.2
0.7

$16.8
—
1.9
(0.9)
—
(0.5)
—
—
—
—

$17.3
—
1.3
(2.8)
—
(0.6)
—
—
—
—

$15.2

—
2.5
(0.5)
—
—
—
—
—

$1,618.5
407.8
1.9
(101.8)
(168.4)
(0.5)
20.2
(169.1)
91.6
—

$1,700.2
389.0
1.3
156.8
(183.3)
(0.6)
18.7
(189.4)
55.0
—

$1,947.7

437.9
2.5
(186.2)
(195.2)
18.2
(255.8)
40.3
—

Balance, November 30, 2014

12.0

116.4

$995.6

$  982.6

$(186.0)

$17.2

$1,809.4

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 47

We capitalize costs of software developed or obtained for internal 
use. Capitalized software development costs include only (1) direct 
costs paid to others for materials and services to develop or buy the 
software, (2) payroll and payroll-related costs for employees who 
work directly on the software development project and (3) interest 
costs while developing the software. Capitalization of these costs 
stops when the project is substantially complete and ready for use. 
Software is amortized using the straight-line method over a range  
of 3 to 8 years, but not exceeding the expected life of the product. 
We capitalized $11.7 million of software development costs during  
the year ended November 30, 2014, $16.7 million during the year 
ended November 30, 2013 and $20.5 million during the year ended 
November 30, 2012.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets 
We review the carrying value of goodwill and indefinite-lived  
intangible assets and conduct tests of impairment on an annual 
basis as described below. We also test goodwill for impairment if 
events or circumstances indicate it is more likely than not that the 
fair value of a reporting unit is below its carrying amount and test 
indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment if events or  
changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. 
Separable intangible assets that have finite useful lives are  
amortized over those lives.

Determining the fair value of a reporting unit or an indefinite-lived 
purchased intangible asset is judgmental in nature and involves the 
use of significant estimates and assumptions. These estimates and 
assumptions include revenue growth rates and operating margins 
used to calculate projected future cash flows, risk-adjusted discount 
rates, assumed royalty rates, future economic and market conditions 
and determination of appropriate market comparables. We base our 
fair value estimates on assumptions we believe to be reasonable but 
that are unpredictable and inherently uncertain. Actual future results 
may differ from these estimates.

Goodwill Impairment 
Our reporting units used to assess potential goodwill impairment are 
the same as our business segments. We calculate fair value of a 
reporting unit by using a discounted cash flow model and then com-
pare that to the carrying amount of the reporting unit, including 
intangible assets and goodwill. If the carrying amount of the report-
ing unit exceeds the calculated fair value, then we would determine 
the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill. An impairment 
charge would be recognized to the extent the carrying amount of 
goodwill exceeds the implied fair value.

Indefinite-lived Intangible Asset Impairment 
Our indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of brand names and 
trademarks. We calculate fair value by using a relief-from-royalty 
method or discounted cash flow model and then compare that to the 
carrying amount of the indefinite-lived intangible asset. If the carry-
ing amount of the indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds its fair 
value, an impairment charge would be recorded to the extent the 
recorded indefinite-lived intangible asset exceeds the fair value.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES 

Consolidation 
The financial statements include the accounts of our majority-owned 
or controlled subsidiaries and affiliates. Intercompany transactions 
have been eliminated. Investments in unconsolidated affiliates, over 
which we exercise significant influence, but not control, are 
accounted for by the equity method. Accordingly, our share of net 
income or loss of unconsolidated affiliates is included in net income. 

Foreign Currency Translation
For majority-owned or controlled subsidiaries and affiliates, if 
located outside of the U.S., with functional currencies other than 
the U.S. dollar, asset and liability accounts are translated at the 
rates of exchange at the balance sheet date and the resultant 
translation adjustments are included in accumulated other compre-
hensive income (loss), a separate component of shareholders’ 
equity. Income and expense items are translated at average 
monthly rates of exchange. Gains and losses from foreign currency 
transactions of these majority-owned or controlled subsidiaries 
and affiliates—that is, transactions denominated in other than  
the functional currency—are included in net earnings.

Our unconsolidated affiliates located outside the U.S. generally use 
their local currencies as their functional currencies. The asset and lia-
bility accounts of those unconsolidated affiliates, and our investment 
in the net assets of those unconsolidated affiliates, are translated at 
the rates of exchange at the balance sheet date and the resultant 
translation adjustments are included in accumulated other compre-
hensive income (loss), a separate component of shareholders’ equity. 
Our income from these unconsolidated operations is translated at 
average monthly rates of exchange.

Use of Estimates 
Preparation of financial statements that follow accounting principles 
generally accepted in the U.S. requires us to make estimates  
and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the  
financial statements and notes. Actual amounts could differ from 
these estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents 
All highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of 
three months or less are classified as cash equivalents.

Inventories 
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is deter-
mined using standard or average costs which approximate the 
first-in, first-out costing method.

Property, Plant and Equipment 
Property, plant and equipment is stated at historical cost and  
depreciated over its estimated useful life using the straight-line 
method for financial reporting and both accelerated and straight-line 
methods for tax reporting. The estimated useful lives range from 20 
to 40 years for buildings and 3 to 12 years for machinery, equipment 
and computer software. Repairs and maintenance costs are 
expensed as incurred.

48

Long-lived Fixed Asset Impairment
Fixed assets and amortizable intangible assets are reviewed for 
impairment as events or changes in circumstances occur indicating 
that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable.  
Undiscounted cash flow analyses are used to determine if an  
impairment exists. If an impairment is determined to exist, the loss  
is calculated based on estimated fair value.

Revenue Recognition 
We recognize revenue when we have an agreement with the customer; 
upon either shipment or delivery, depending upon contractual terms; 
and when the sales price is fixed or determinable and collectability 
is reasonably assured. We reduce revenue for estimated product 
returns, allowances and price discounts based on historical experience 
and contractual terms.

Trade allowances, consisting primarily of customer pricing allow-
ances, merchandising funds and consumer coupons, are offered 
through various programs to customers and consumers. Revenue is 
recorded net of trade allowances.

Trade accounts receivable are amounts billed and currently due from 
customers. We have an allowance for doubtful accounts to reduce 
our receivables to their net realizable value. We estimate the allow-
ance for doubtful accounts based on the aging of our receivables 
and our history of collections.

Shipping and Handling 
Shipping and handling costs on our products sold to customers are 
included in selling, general and administrative expense in the income 
statement. Shipping and handling expense was $100.3 million, $96.9 
million and $94.8 million for 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Research and Development 
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred and are 
included in selling, general and administrative expense in the income 
statement. Research and development expense was $62.0 million, 
$61.3 million and $57.8 million for 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Brand Marketing Support 
Total brand marketing support costs, which are included in selling, 
general and administrative expense in the income statement, were 
$226.6 million, $207.8 million and $198.3 million for 2014, 2013 and 
2012, respectively. Brand marketing support costs include advertis-
ing, promotions and customer trade funds used for cooperative 
advertising. Promotion costs include public relations, shopper mar-
keting, social marketing activities, general consumer promotion 
activities and depreciation on assets used in these promotional 
activities. Advertising costs include the development, production 
and communication of advertisements through television, digital, 
print and radio. Development and production costs are expensed in 
the period in which the advertisement is first run. All other costs of 
advertisement are expensed as incurred. Advertising expense was 
$100.4 million, $85.0 million and $86.2 million for 2014, 2013 and 
2012, respectively.

Employee Benefit and Retirement Plans
We sponsor defined benefit pension plans in the U.S. and certain 
foreign locations. In addition, we sponsor defined contribution plans 
in the U.S. and contribute to government-sponsored retirement plans 
in locations outside the U.S. We also currently provide postretirement 
medical and life insurance benefits to certain U.S. employees.

We recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our defined 
benefit pension plans as an asset or a liability in the balance sheet, 
with changes in the funded status recorded through comprehensive 
income in the year in which those changes occur.

The expected return on plan assets is determined using the expected 
rate of return and a calculated value of plan assets referred to as the 
market-related value of plan assets. Differences between assumed 
and actual returns are amortized to the market-related value of 
assets on a straight-line basis over five years.

We use the corridor approach in the valuation of defined benefit 
pension plans. The corridor approach defers all actuarial gains and 
losses resulting from variances between actual results and actuarial 
assumptions. For defined benefit pension plans, these unrecognized 
gains and losses are amortized when the net gains and losses 
exceed 10% of the greater of the market-related value of plan  
assets or the projected benefit obligation at the beginning of the 
year. The amount in excess of the corridor is amortized over the 
average remaining service period to retirement date of active  
plan participants.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements 
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued 
Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 Revenue from Contracts 
with Customers (Topic 606). This guidance is intended to improve and 
converge with international standards the financial reporting require-
ments for revenue from contracts with customers. It will be effective 
for our first quarter of 2018 and early adoption is not permitted.  
We have not yet determined the impact from adoption of this new 
accounting pronouncement on our financial statements.

In February 2013, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update  
No. 2013-02 Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of 
Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive 
Income. This guidance is intended to provide disclosure on items 
reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) 
either in the notes or parenthetically on the face of the income 
statement. We adopted this new accounting pronouncement in 2014 
and have included the necessary disclosures in note 9, Accumulated 
Other Comprehensive Loss. There was no impact on our financial 
statements from adoption, other than the additional disclosures.

2. ACQUISITIONS 

Acquisitions are part of our strategy to increase sales and profits.

On May 31, 2013, we completed the purchase of the assets of 
Wuhan Asia-Pacific Condiments Co. Ltd. (WAPC), a privately held 
company based in China, for $144.8 million, which included $142.3 
million of cash paid, net of closing adjustments, and the assumption  

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 49

of $2.5 million of liabilities. The acquisition was financed with a 
combination of cash and debt. WAPC manufactures and markets 
DaQiao and ChuShiLe brand bouillon products, which have a leading 
position in the central region of China. WAPC is included in our con-
sumer business segment from the date of acquisition. At the time of 
acquisition, annual sales of WAPC were approximately $122 million. 
During the second quarter of 2014, we completed the final valuation 
of the assets of WAPC which resulted in $26.9 million allocated to  
tangible net assets, $46.1 million allocated to other intangible assets 
and $71.8 million allocated to goodwill. The completion of the final 
valuation did not result in material changes to our consolidated  
income statement or our consolidated balance sheet from our pre-
liminary purchase price allocation. Goodwill related to the WAPC 
acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes. During the years 
ended November 30, 2013 and 2012, we recorded $4.3 million and 
$1.7 million, respectively, in transaction-related expenses associated 
with the WAPC acquisition in selling, general and administrative 
expenses in our income statement.

Proforma financial information for the Wuhan acquisition has not 
been presented because the financial impact is not material.

3. SPECIAL CHARGES

In the fourth quarter of 2013, we announced a reorganization in 
parts of the Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) region to further 
improve EMEA’s profitability and process standardization while  
supporting its competitiveness and long-term growth. These actions 
include the closure of our current sales and distribution operations  
in The Netherlands, with the transition to a third-party distributor 
model to continue to sell the Silvo® brand, as well as actions 
intended to streamline selling, general and administrative activities 
throughout EMEA, including the centralization of certain shared 
service activity across parts of the region into Poland.

In 2014, we recorded $2.1 million of charges associated with this  
previously announced EMEA reorganization, with $1.1 million related 
to employee severance and $1.0 million for other exit costs. For 2013, 
we recorded $25.0 million of charges related to this reorganization. 
For both years, these charges have been included on a separate line  
in the consolidated income statement. Of the $25.0 million of special 
charges recognized in 2013, $15.9 million related to employee sev-
erance, $6.4 million to asset write-downs, and $2.7 million to other 
exit costs. 

These reorganization actions in the EMEA region are expected to 
generate annual cost savings of approximately $10 million when 
completed in 2015. Total cash expenditures for the EMEA  
reorganization were $10.7 million in 2014 and are expected to be 
approximately $10 million in 2015. Of the $2.1 million of special 
charges recognized with respect to this reorganization in 2014,  
all have been recorded in the consumer business segment. Of the 
$25.0 million of special charges recognized in 2013, $22.2 million  
were recorded in the consumer business segment and $2.8 million 
were recorded in the industrial business segment.

The $6.4 million asset write-down included in the $25.0 million spe-
cial charge for 2013 relates to an impairment charge for the reduc-
tion in the value of our Silvo brand name in The Netherlands. Our 
decision to transition to a third-party distributor model to continue to 
sell the Silvo brand led us to conclude an impairment indicator to the 
Silvo brand was present. We calculated the fair value of the Silvo  
brand using the relief-from-royalty method and determined that it 
was lower than its carrying value. Consequently, we recorded a non-
cash impairment charge of $6.4 million as part of the $22.2 million in  
special charges included in our consumer business segment during 
the fourth quarter of 2013. The carrying value of the Silvo brand 
name as of November 30, 2014 is not significant.

The following table outlines the major components of accrual  
balances relating to the special charges associated with this EMEA 
reorganization as of November 30, 2013 and November 30, 2014  
(in millions):

Balance as of November 30, 2013
Special charges
Amounts utilized

Balance as of November 30, 2014

   Employee 
severance

Other exit 
costs

$15.9
1.1
 (7.7)

$  9.3

$ 2.7
1.0
(3.0)

$ 0.7

Total

$ 18.6
2.1
(10.7)

$ 10.0

In 2014, we continued to evaluate changes to our organizational 
structure to enable us to reduce fixed costs, simplify or improve pro-
cesses, and improve our competitiveness. In addition to the $2.1 million 
of special charges recognized in 2014 related to the previously 
announced EMEA reorganization, we also undertook reorganization 
actions in the U.S. and Australian businesses in 2014 and recognized 
an additional $3.1 million of special charges, consisting of the follow-
ing: (1) During the third quarter of 2014, we recorded special charges 
in the amount of $1.3 million, principally related to employee sever-
ance, to realign certain manufacturing operations in the U.S. indus-
trial business. Cash expenditures in 2014 associated with this action 
totaled $0.4 million. We expect that this action will be completed by 
2015 and, upon completion, generate annual savings of approximately 
$2.3 million. (2) During the fourth quarter of 2014, we recorded spe-
cial charges in the Australian business in the amount of $0.7 million, 
all related to the consumer segment business, consisting of employee 
severance and related expenses, to streamline costs through the 
elimination of certain manufacturing and administrative positions. 
Cash expenditures in 2014 associated with this reorganization totaled 
$0.2 million. We expect that this reorganization will be completed in 
2015 and, upon completion, generate annual savings of approximately 
$0.8 million. (3) During the fourth quarter of 2014, we recorded spe-
cial charges of $1.1 million, consisting of employee severance and 
related expenses, to eliminate certain administrative positions in the 
U.S. business. Of the $1.1 million in special charges, $0.9 million and 
$0.2 million related to the consumer business segment and industrial 
business segment, respectively. Cash expenditures in 2014 associ-
ated with this action totaled $0.2 million. We expect that this action 
will be completed in 2015 and, upon completion, generate annual 
savings of approximately $1.2 million. 

50

 
 
 
 
  
4. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS 

The following table displays intangible assets as of November 30, 
2014 and 2013:

Our principal earnings from unconsolidated affiliates is from our 50% 
interest in McCormick de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. Profit from this joint 
venture represented 91% of income from unconsolidated operations 
in 2014, 78% in 2013 and 82% in 2012.

2014

2013

Gross 
carrying 
amount

Accumulated 
amortization

Gross 
carrying 
amount

Accumulated 
amortization

6. FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS 

Our outstanding debt was as follows at November 30:

(millions)

Finite-lived  

intangible assets

$ 

94.7

$34.7

$ 

93.9

$30.2

Indefinite-lived 

intangible assets:
  Goodwill
  Brand names and 
trademarks

Total goodwill and  
intangible assets

1,722.2

270.8

1,993.0

1,798.5

269.7

2,068.2

$ 2,087.7

$34.7

$ 2,162.1

$30.2

Intangible asset amortization expense was $5.6 million, $5.2 million 
and $4.3 million for 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. At November 30, 
2014, finite-lived intangible assets had a weighted-average remain-
ing life of approximately 13 years.

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment for the 
years ended November 30, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

2014

2013

(millions)

Consumer

Industrial

Consumer

Industrial

Beginning of year
Changes in purchase  
  price allocation
Goodwill acquired
Foreign currency  
  fluctuations and other

$1,654.7

$143.8

$1,551.0

$144.3

(6.1)
—

—
—

(67.5)

(2.7)

—
77.9

25.8

—
—

(0.5)

End of year

$1,581.1

$141.1

$1,654.7

$143.8

5. INVESTMENTS IN AFFILIATES 

Summarized annual and year-end information from the financial 
statements of unconsolidated affiliates representing 100% of the 
businesses follows:

(millions)

Net sales
Gross profit
Net income

Current assets
Noncurrent assets
Current liabilities
Noncurrent liabilities

2014    

2013

2012

$766.6
275.7
67.5

$320.1
123.6
137.2
6.3

$761.4
256.9
53.8

$288.9
128.4
141.0
7.2

$727.1
229.2
47.1

$274.4
104.2
129.9
20.5

Our share of undistributed earnings of unconsolidated affiliates was 
$96.7 million at November 30, 2014. Royalty income from unconsoli-
dated affiliates was $18.7 million, $18.4 million and $17.1 million for 
2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

(millions)

Short-term borrowings
  Commercial paper
  Other

2014

2013  

$  239.4
30.2

$  200.3
11.3

$  269.6

$  211.6

Weighted-average interest rate of short-term  
  borrowings at year-end

1.3%

0.7%

Long-term debt
  5.20% notes due 12/15/2015 (1)
  5.75% notes due 12/15/2017(2)
  3.90% notes due 7/8/2021(3)
  3.50% notes due 8/19/2023 (4)
  7.63%–8.12% notes due 2024
  Other
Unamortized discounts and fair  
  value adjustments

Less current portion

$  200.0
250.0
250.0
250.0
55.0
8.5

1.8

1,015.3
1.2

$  200.0
250.0
250.0
250.0
55.0
10.8

5.7

1,021.5
2.5

$ 1,014.1

$ 1,019.0

(1)  The fixed interest rate on $100 million of the 5.20% notes due in 2015 is effectively 
converted to a variable rate by interest rate swaps through 2015. Net interest pay-
ments are based on 3 month LIBOR minus 0.05% during this period (our effective 
rate as of November 30, 2014 was 0.19%).

(2)  Interest rate swaps, settled upon the issuance of these notes in 2007, effectively 
fixed the interest rate on the $250 million notes at a weighted-average fixed rate  
of 6.25%.

(3)  Interest rate swaps, settled upon the issuance of these notes in 2011, effectively 
fixed the interest rate on the $250 million notes at a weighted-average fixed rate 
of 4.01%.

(4)  Interest rate swaps, settled upon the issuance of these notes in 2013, effectively 
fixed the interest rate on the $250 million notes at a weighted-average fixed rate  
of 3.30%.

Maturities of long-term debt during the fiscal years subsequent to 
November 30, 2014 are as follows (in millions):

2016
2017
2018
2019
Thereafter

$ 200.6
0.7
250.7
0.8
559.5

In August 2013, we issued $250 million of 3.50% notes due 2023, 
with net cash proceeds received of $246.2 million. Interest is pay-
able semiannually in arrears in March and September of each year. 
Of these notes, $175 million were subject to interest rate hedges as 
further disclosed in note 7. The net proceeds from this offering, plus 
cash on hand, were used to pay off $250 million of 5.25% notes that 
matured in September 2013.

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 51

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
We have available credit facilities with domestic and foreign banks 
for various purposes. Some of these lines are committed lines and 
others are uncommitted lines and could be withdrawn at various 
times. In June 2011, we entered into a five-year $600 million revolv-
ing credit facility, which will expire in June 2016. The pricing for this 
credit facility, on a fully drawn basis, is LIBOR plus 0.875%. This 
credit facility supports our commercial paper program and we have 
$360.6 million of capacity at November 30, 2014, after $239.4 mil-
lion was used to support issued commercial paper. In addition, we 
have several uncommitted lines which have a total unused capacity 
at November 30, 2014 of $125.4 million. These lines by their nature 
can be withdrawn based on the lenders’ discretion. Committed 
credit facilities require a fee, and annual commitment fees were 
$0.5 million for 2014 and 2013.

Rental expense under operating leases (primarily buildings and 
equipment) was $40.3 million in 2014, $37.6 million in 2013 and 
$32.7 million in 2012. Future annual fixed rental payments for the 
years ending November 30 are as follows (in millions):

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
Thereafter

$23.4
17.6
13.9
11.3
8.5
17.6

At November 30, 2014, we had guarantees outstanding of $0.6 million 
with terms of one year or less. At November 30, 2014 and 2013, we 
had outstanding letters of credit of $8.1 million and $61.9 million, 
respectively. These letters of credit typically act as a guarantee of 
payment to certain third parties in accordance with specified terms 
and conditions. The unused portion of our letter of credit facility was 
$12.9 million at November 30, 2014.

7. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS 

We use derivative financial instruments to enhance our ability to 
manage risk, including foreign currency and interest rate exposures, 
which exist as part of our ongoing business operations. We do not 
enter into contracts for trading purposes, nor are we a party to any 
leveraged derivative instrument and all derivatives are designated 
as hedges. We are not a party to master netting arrangements, and 
we do not offset the fair value of derivative contracts with the same 
counterparty in our financial statement disclosures. The use of deriv-
ative financial instruments is monitored through regular communica-
tion with senior management and the use of written guidelines.

Foreign Currency 
We are potentially exposed to foreign currency fluctuations affecting 
net investments, transactions and earnings denominated in foreign 
currencies. We selectively hedge the potential effect of these for-
eign currency fluctuations by entering into foreign currency exchange 
contracts with highly-rated financial institutions.

Contracts which are designated as hedges of anticipated purchases 
denominated in a foreign currency (generally purchases of raw mate-
rials in U.S. dollars by operating units outside the U.S.) are consid-
ered cash flow hedges. The gains and losses on these contracts are 
deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income until the 
hedged item is recognized in cost of goods sold, at which time the 
net amount deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income is 
also recognized in cost of goods sold. Gains and losses from con-
tracts which are designated as hedges of assets, liabilities or firm 
commitments are recognized through income, offsetting the change 
in fair value of the hedged item.

At November 30, 2014, we had foreign currency exchange contracts 
to purchase or sell $262.7 million of foreign currencies versus  
$204.9 million at November 30, 2013. All of these contracts were 
designated as hedges of anticipated purchases denominated in a 
foreign currency or hedges of foreign currency denominated assets 
or liabilities. Hedge ineffectiveness was not material. At November 
30, 2014, we had $127.1 million of notional contracts that have  
durations of less than seven days that are used to hedge short-term 
cash flow funding. The remaining contracts have durations of one  
to twelve months.

Interest Rates 
We finance a portion of our operations with both fixed and variable 
rate debt instruments, primarily commercial paper, notes and bank 
loans. We utilize interest rate swap agreements to minimize world-
wide financing costs and to achieve a desired mix of variable and 
fixed rate debt.

In November 2012 and in April and August 2013, we entered into a 
total of $175 million of forward-starting interest rate swap and 
Treasury rate lock agreements to manage our interest rate risk asso-
ciated with the anticipated issuance of fixed rate notes in August 
2013. We cash settled all of these agreements, which were desig-
nated as cash flow hedges, for a gain of $9.0 million simultaneous 
with the issuance of the notes at an all-in effective fixed rate of 
3.30% on the full $250 million of debt. The gain on these agree-
ments is deferred in accumulated other comprehensive income and 
will be amortized to reduce interest expense over the life of the 
notes. Hedge ineffectiveness of these agreements was not material.

In March 2006, we entered into interest rate swap contracts for a 
total notional amount of $100 million to receive interest at 5.20% 
and pay a variable rate of interest based on three-month LIBOR 
minus 0.05%. We designated these swaps, which expire in 
December 2015, as fair value hedges of the changes in fair value of 
$100 million of the $200 million 5.20% medium-term notes due 2015 
that we issued in December 2005. Any unrealized gain or loss on 
these swaps will be offset by a corresponding increase or decrease 
in the value of the hedged debt. No hedge ineffectiveness is recog-
nized as the interest rate swaps qualify for the “shortcut” treatment 
as defined under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

52

 
The following tables disclose the derivative instruments on our balance sheet as of November 30, 2014 and 2013, which are all recorded at  
fair value:

As of November 30, 2014:

(millions)

Derivatives

Asset Derivatives

Liability Derivatives

Balance sheet location

Notional amount

Fair value  

Balance sheet location

Notional amount

Fair value

Interest rate contracts
Foreign exchange contracts

Other current assets
Other current assets

$100.0
106.3

Other accrued liabilities
Other accrued liabilities

—
$156.4

$  7.4
4.9

$12.3

—
$1.4

$ 1.4

Total

As of November 30, 2013:

(millions)

Derivatives

Asset Derivatives

Liability Derivatives

Balance sheet location

Notional amount

Fair value  

Balance sheet location

Notional amount

Fair value

Interest rate contracts
Foreign exchange contracts

Other current assets
Other current assets

$100.0
79.2

Total

Other accrued liabilities
Other accrued liabilities

—
$125.7

$12.2
1.1

$13.3

—
$1.6

$1.6

The following tables disclose the impact of derivative instruments on other comprehensive income (OCI), accumulated other comprehensive 
income (AOCI) and our income statement for the years ended November 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012:

Fair value hedges (millions)

Derivative

Interest rate contracts

Cash flow hedges (millions)

Derivative

Interest rate contracts
Foreign exchange contracts

Total

Income statement 
location

Interest expense

Income (expense)

2014

$5.0

2013

$5.0

2012

$4.7

Gain (loss) 
recognized in OCI

2014

2013

— $  9.2
1.0

$4.2

$4.2

$10.2

2012

$(0.1)
(2.4)

$(2.5)

Income statement 
location

Interest expense
Cost of goods sold

Gain (loss) 
reclassified from AOCI

2014

$(0.2)
(1.1)

$(1.3)

2013

$(1.3)
0.3

$(1.0)

2012

$(1.4)
0.6

$(0.8)

The amount of gain or loss recognized in income on the ineffective portion of derivative instruments is not material. The net amount of other  
comprehensive income expected to be reclassified into income related to these contracts in the next twelve months is a $4.3 million increase  
to earnings.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments 
The carrying amount and fair value of financial instruments at November 30, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:

(millions)

Long-term investments
Long-term debt
Derivatives related to:

Interest rates (assets)
Foreign currency (assets)
Foreign currency (liabilities)

2014

2013

Carrying amount

Fair value

Carrying amount

Fair value

$   113.0
1,015.3

$   113.0
1,109.0

$   103.4
1,021.5

$   103.4
1,102.4

7.4
4.9
1.4

7.4
4.9
1.4

12.2
1.1
1.6

12.2
1.1
1.6

Because of their short-term nature, the amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash and cash equivalents, receivables, short-term borrowings 
and trade accounts payable approximate fair value.

Investments in affiliates are not readily marketable, and it is not practicable to estimate their fair value. Long-term investments are comprised of 
fixed income and equity securities held on behalf of employees in certain employee benefit plans and are stated at fair value on the balance sheet. 
The cost of these investments was $80.1 million and $77.5 million at November 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 53

 
 
 
   
 
 
 
Concentrations of Credit Risk 
We are potentially exposed to concentrations of credit risk with 
trade accounts receivable, prepaid allowances and financial instru-
ments. The customers of our consumer business are predominantly 
food retailers and food wholesalers. Consolidations in these indus-
tries have created larger customers. In addition, competition has 
increased with the growth in alternative channels including mass 
merchandisers, dollar stores, warehouse clubs and discount chains. 
This has caused some customers to be less profitable and increased 
our exposure to credit risk. We have a large and diverse customer 
base and, other than with respect to the two customers disclosed in 
note 16, each of which accounted for greater than 10% of our con-
solidated sales, there was no material concentration of credit risk  
in these accounts at November 30, 2014. At November 30, 2014, 
amounts due from those two customers aggregated approximately 
21% of consolidated trade accounts receivable and prepaid allow-
ances. Current credit markets are highly volatile and some of our 
customers and counterparties are highly leveraged. We continue to 
closely monitor the credit worthiness of our customers and counter-
parties and generally do not require collateral. We believe that the 
allowance for doubtful accounts properly recognized trade receivables  

at realizable value. We consider nonperformance credit risk for other 
financial instruments to be insignificant.

8. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS 

Fair value can be measured using valuation techniques, such as the 
market approach (comparable market prices), the income approach 
(present value of future income or cash flow) and the cost approach 
(cost to replace the service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). 
Accounting standards utilize a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the 
inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three 
broad levels. The following is a brief description of those three levels:

•  Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in 

active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

•  Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for 
the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These include 
quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and 
quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets 
that are not active.

•  Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect management’s  

own assumptions.

Our population of assets and liabilities subject to fair value measurements on a recurring basis at November 30, 2014 and 2013 are as follows:

(millions)

Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Insurance contracts
Bonds and other long-term investments
Interest rate derivatives
Foreign currency derivatives

  Total

Liabilities
Foreign currency derivatives

  Total

(millions)

Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Insurance contracts
Bonds and other long-term investments
Interest rate derivatives
Foreign currency derivatives

  Total

Liabilities
Foreign currency derivatives

  Total

Fair value measurements using fair value 
hierarchy as of November 30, 2014

Fair value

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

$  77.3
104.5
8.5
7.4
4.9

$202.6

$    1.4

$    1.4

$77.3
—
8.5
—
—

$85.8

—

—

—
$104.5
—
7.4
4.9

$116.8

$    1.4

$    1.4

—
—

—
—

—

—

—

Fair value measurements using fair value  
hierarchy as of November 30, 2013

Fair value

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

$  63.0
90.1
13.3
12.2
1.1

$179.7

1.6

$    1.6

$63.0
—
13.3
—
—

$76.3

—

—

—
$  90.1
—
12.2
1.1

$103.4

1.6

$    1.6

—
—

—
—

—

—

—

The fair values of insurance contracts are based upon the underlying values of the securities in which they are invested and are from quoted market 
prices from various stock and bond exchanges for similar type assets. The fair values of bonds and other long-term investments are based on quoted 
market prices from various stock and bond exchanges. The fair values for interest rate and foreign currency derivatives are based on values for similar 
instruments using models with market based inputs.

54

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
9. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

The following table sets forth the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax where applicable (in millions):

(millions)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax where applicable:

Foreign currency translation adjustment

  Unrealized gain (loss) on foreign currency exchange contracts
  Unamortized value of settled interest rate swaps
  Pension and other postretirement costs

2014

2013

$  32.1
3.0
2.9
(224.0)

$ 165.7
(0.3)
2.0
(167.7)

$(186.0)

$ 

(0.3)

The following table sets forth the amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and into consolidated net income for 
the years ended November 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012:

(millions)  
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Components

2014

2013

2012

Affected Line Items in the 
Consolidated Income Statement

Gains/(losses) on cash flow hedges:

Interest rate derivatives
Foreign exchange contracts

  Total before taxes
  Tax effect

  Net, after tax

Amortization of pension and postretirement benefit adjustments:
  Amortization of prior service costs (1)
  Amortization of net actuarial losses (1)

  Total before taxes
  Tax effect

  Net, after tax

$ (0.2)
(1.1)

$  (1.3)
0.3

$ (1.4)
0.6

Interest expense
Cost of goods sold

(1.3)
0.3

(1.0)
0.3

(0.8)
0.2

$ (1.0)

$  (0.7)

$ (0.6)

$  0.3
16.4

16.7
(5.7)

$  (0.8)
36.5

35.7
(12.1)

$ (3.5)
21.6

18.1
(6.2)

$ 11.0

$ 23.6

$ 11.9

Income taxes

SG&A expense/Cost of goods sold
SG&A expense/Cost of goods sold

Income taxes

(1)  This accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) component is included in the computation of total pension expense and total other postretirement expense (refer to note 10 for 

additional details).

10. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT AND RETIREMENT PLANS 

We sponsor defined benefit pension plans in the U.S. and certain foreign locations. In addition, we sponsor defined contribution plans in the U.S. 
and contribute to government-sponsored retirement plans in locations outside the U.S. We also currently provide postretirement medical and life 
insurance benefits to certain U.S. employees.

Included in accumulated other comprehensive loss at November 30, 2014 was $330.0 million ($224.0 million net of tax) related to net unrecognized 
actuarial losses of $327.9 million and unrecognized prior service costs of $2.1 million that have not yet been recognized in net periodic pension or 
postretirement benefit cost. We expect to recognize $23.4 million ($15.7 million net of tax) in net periodic pension and postretirement benefit 
expense during 2015 related to the amortization of actuarial losses of $23.1 million and the amortization of prior service costs of $0.3 million.

Defined Benefit Pension Plans 
The significant assumptions used to determine benefit obligations are as follows as of November 30:

Discount rate—funded plan
Discount rate—unfunded plan
Salary scale

United States

International

2014

4.4%
4.3%
3.8%

2013

5.2%
5.1%
3.8%

2014

2013

3.8%
—
3.0–3.8%

4.6%
—
3.0–3.8%

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 55

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The significant assumptions used to determine pension expense are as follows:

Discount rate—funded plan
Discount rate—unfunded plan
Salary scale
Expected return on plan assets

United States

International

2014

5.2%
5.1%
3.8%
8.0%

2013

4.3%
4.2%
3.8%
8.0%

2012

5.5%
5.4%
3.8%
8.3%

2014

2013

2012

4.6%
—
3.0–3.8%
6.4%

4.4%
—
3.0–3.8%
6.6%

5.1%
—
3.0–3.8%
6.7%

Annually, we undertake a process, with the assistance of our external investment consultants, to evaluate the appropriate projected rates of return to 
use for our pension plans’ assumptions. We engage our investment consultants’ research teams to develop capital market assumptions for each asset 
category in our plans to project investment returns into the future. The specific methods used to develop expected return assumptions vary by asset 
category. We adjust the outcomes for the fact that plan assets are invested with actively managed funds and subject to tactical asset reallocation.

Our 2013 pension expense includes a loss on voluntary pension settlement of $15.3 million related to the U.S. pension plan. During the third quarter 
of 2013, we offered former employees with deferred vested benefits in that plan the opportunity to settle those benefits in exchange for a lump sum 
payment. Based upon the acceptance of that offer by certain employees, $63.3 million was paid from plan assets in the fourth quarter of 2013 with 
a corresponding decrease in the benefit obligation and we recognized the $15.3 million settlement loss previously described. The loss on voluntary 
pension settlement is reflected as a separate line in the consolidated income statement.

Our pension expense was as follows:

(millions)

Service cost
Interest costs
Expected return on plan assets
Loss on voluntary pension settlement
Amortization of prior service costs
Amortization of net actuarial loss
Other

United States

International 

2014

$ 20.0
31.1
(38.8)
—
—
11.8
—

$ 24.1

2013

2012

$ 23.2
31.2
(41.4)
15.3
—
29.5
—

$ 57.8

$ 17.5
31.8
(37.8)
—
0.1
18.1
—

$ 29.7

2014

$   7.8
13.8
(18.7)
—
0.3
4.6
—

$   7.8

2013

$   8.8
12.6
(17.2)
—
0.4
5.6
0.1

$  10.3

2012

$   6.8
12.8
(16.2)
—
0.4
3.5
—

$   7.3

Rollforward of the benefit obligation, fair value of plan assets and a reconciliation of the pension plans’ funded status as of November 30, the 
measurement date, follows:

United States

International

2014

2013

2014

2013

$607.7
20.0
31.1
—
—
—
94.0
(24.4)
—
—

$728.4

$735.2
23.2
31.2
—
(63.3)
—
(97.8)
(20.8)
—
—

$607.7

$ 304.9
7.8
13.8
1.5
—
(0.6)
49.9
(13.9)
(0.8)
(21.0)

$ 341.6

$ 300.8
8.8
12.6
1.7
—
(1.4)
(5.5)
(8.6)
(0.8)
(2.7)

$ 304.9

(millions)

Change in benefit obligation:

 Benefit obligation at beginning of year
  Service cost

Interest costs

  Employee contributions
  Voluntary pension settlement
  Plan changes and other
  Actuarial (gain) loss
  Benefits paid
  Expenses paid

Foreign currency impact

Benefit obligation at end of year

56

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(millions)

Change in fair value of plan assets:

 Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year
  Actual return on plan assets
  Employer contributions
  Employee contributions
  Voluntary pension settlement
  Benefits paid
  Expenses paid

Foreign currency impact

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

Funded status

Pension plans in which accumulated benefit obligation exceeded 
  plan assets

 Accumulated benefit obligation
Fair value of plan assets

Included in the U.S. in the preceding table is a benefit obligation of 
$91.3 million and $81.2 million for 2014 and 2013, respectively, 
related to a nonqualified defined benefit plan pursuant to which we 
will pay supplemental pension benefits to certain key employees 
upon retirement based upon the employees’ years of service and 
compensation. The accumulated benefit obligation related to this 
plan was $86.7 million and $76.8 million as of November 30, 2014 
and 2013, respectively. The assets related to this plan, which totaled 
$79.6 million and $74.4 million as of November 30, 2014 and 2013, 
respectively, are held in a rabbi trust and accordingly have not been 
included in the preceding table. 

Amounts recorded in the balance sheet for all defined benefit pension 
plans consist of the following:

(millions)

Non-current pension asset
Accrued pension liability
Deferred income tax assets
Accumulated other  

comprehensive loss 

United States

International

2014

—
$152.1
87.9

144.0

2013

$25.8
81.2
59.4

2014

$  0.3
36.6
19.3

2013

—
$25.0
15.7

95.5

82.5

74.1

The accumulated benefit obligation is the present value of pension 
benefits (whether vested or unvested) attributed to employee ser-
vice rendered before the measurement date and based on employee 
service and compensation prior to that date. The accumulated bene-
fit obligation differs from the projected benefit obligation in that it 
includes no assumption about future compensation or service levels. 
The accumulated benefit obligation for the U.S. pension plans was 
$636.7 million and $532.8 million as of November 30, 2014 and 
2013, respectively. The accumulated benefit obligation for the inter-
national pension plans was $310.9 million and $276.5 million as of 
November 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

United States

International

2014

2013

2014

2013

$ 552.3
43.9
4.5
—
—
(24.4)
—
—

$ 576.3

$ (152.1)

$519.8
84.5
32.1
—
(63.3)
(20.8)
—
—

$552.3

$ (55.4)

$ 279.9
44.8
12.3
1.5
—
(13.9)
(0.8)
(18.5)

$ 305.3

$ (36.3)

$ 247.6
31.4
10.6
1.7
—
(8.6)
(0.8)
(2.0)

$ 279.9

$ (25.0)

$  86.7
—

$  76.8
—

$ 189.2
174.2

$ 191.4
176.8

The investment objectives of the defined benefit pension plans are 
to provide assets to meet the current and future obligations of the 
plans at a reasonable cost to us. The goal is to optimize the long-
term return across the portfolio of investments at a moderate level 
of risk. Higher-returning assets include mutual, co-mingled and  
other funds comprised of equity securities, utilizing both active and 
passive investment styles. These more volatile assets are balanced 
with less volatile assets, primarily mutual, co-mingled and other funds 
comprised of fixed income securities. Professional investment firms 
are engaged to provide advice on the selection and monitoring of 
investment funds, and to provide advice on the allocation of plan 
assets across the various fund managers. This advice is based in part 
on the duration of each plan’s liability. The investment return perfor-
mances are evaluated quarterly against specific benchmark indices 
and against a peer group of funds of the same asset classification.

Our allocations of U.S. pension plan assets as of November 30, 2014 
and 2013, by asset category, were as follows:

Asset Category

Equity securities
Fixed income securities
Other

Total

Actual

2014

70.4%
15.5%
14.1%

2013

70.2%
23.1%
6.7%

2014
Target

65.0%
17.5%
17.5%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0%

The allocations of the international pension plans’ assets as of 
November 30, 2014 and 2013, by asset category, were as follows:

Asset Category

Equity securities
Fixed income securities
Other

Total

Actual

2014

56.6%
43.2%
0.2%

2013

57.6%
42.1%
0.3%

2014
Target

53.0%
41.0%
6.0%

100.0%

100.0%

100.0 %

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 57

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
As of November 30, 2013

International

(millions)

Cash and cash equivalents
 International equity  
  securities (b)
Fixed income securities:
 U.S./government/ 

corporate bonds (c)
Insurance contracts (f)

Total investments

Total  
fair value

$   0.6

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

$0.6

—

161.4

—

$161.4

99.3
18.6

$279.9

—
—

$0.6

99.3
18.6

$279.3

—

—

—
—

—

(a)  This category comprises equity funds and collective equity trust funds that most 

closely track the S&P index and other equity indices.

(b)  This category comprises international equity funds with varying benchmark indices.
(c)   This category comprises funds consisting of U.S. government and U.S. corporate 

bonds and other fixed income securities. An appropriate benchmark is the Barclays 
Capital Aggregate Bond Index.

(d)  This category comprises funds consisting of real estate related debt securities with 

an appropriate benchmark of the Barclays Investment Grade CMBS Index.

(e)  This category comprises funds consisting of international government/corporate 

bonds and other fixed income securities with varying benchmark indices.
(f)   This category comprises insurance contracts, the majority of which have a  

guaranteed investment return.

(g)  This category comprises hedge funds investing in strategies represented in  

various HFRI Fund indices.

(h)  This category comprises private equity, venture capital and limited partnerships.

The change in fair value of the plans’ Level 3 assets for 2014 is  
summarized as follows:

(millions)

Hedge funds
Private equity funds

Total 

Beginning 
of year

Realized 
gains

Unrealized 
gains 
(losses)

Net, 
purchases 
and (sales)

$18.5
4.9

$23.4

$1.5
0.9

$2.4

$(1.7)
0.2

$(1.5)

$36.4
(1.0)

$35.4

End of 
year

$54.7
5.0

$59.7

The change in fair value of the plans’ Level 3 assets for 2013 is  
summarized as follows:

(millions)

Hedge funds
Private equity funds

Total 

Beginning 
of year

Realized 
gains

Unrealized 
gains 
(losses) 

Net, 
purchases 
and (sales)

$21.1
5.3

$26.4

$0.9
0.5

$1.4

$  1.5
(0.1)

$ 1.4

$(5.0)
(0.8)

$(5.8)

End of 
year

$18.5
4.9

$23.4

The value for the Level 3 hedge funds’ assets is determined by an 
administrator using financial statements of the underlying funds or 
estimates provided by fund managers. The value for the Level 3 pri-
vate equity funds’ assets is determined by the general partner or the 
general partner’s designee. In addition, for the plans’ Level 3 assets, 
we engage an independent advisor to compare the funds’ returns to 
other funds with similar strategies. Each fund is required to have an 
annual audit by an independent accountant, which is provided to the 
independent advisor. This provides a basis of comparability relative 
to similar assets in this category.

The following tables set forth by level, within the fair value  
hierarchy as described in note 8, pension plan assets at their fair 
value as of November 30, 2014 and 2013 for the United States  
and international plans:

As of November 30, 2014

United States

Total 
fair value

  Level 1

  Level 2

Level 3

(millions)

Cash and cash equivalents
Equity securities:
  U.S. equity securities (a)
 International equity  
  securities (b)

Fixed income securities:
 U.S./government/ 
  corporate bonds (c)

  High yield bonds (d)

 International/government/ 
  corporate bonds (e)
Insurance contracts (f)
Other types of investments:
  Hedge funds (g)
  Private equity funds (h)

$  15.0

$  15.0

—

301.0

111.1

30.6
31.9

25.9
1.1

54.7
5.0

144.3

$156.7

111.1

—

30.6
—

25.9
—

—
—

—
31.9

—
1.1

—
—

Total investments

$576.3

$326.9

$189.7

As of November 30, 2014

International

Total  
fair value

$    0.6

  Level 1

  Level 2

Level 3

$0.6

—

172.7

—

$172.7

108.5
23.5

$305.3

—
—

$0.6

108.5
23.5

$304.7

As of November 30, 2013

United States

Total  
fair value

   Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

(millions)

Cash and cash equivalents
 International equity  
  securities (b)
Fixed income securities:
 U.S./government/ 
  corporate bonds (c)
Insurance contracts (f)

Total investments

(millions)

Cash and cash equivalents
Equity securities:
  U.S. equity securities (a)
 International equity  
  securities (b)

Fixed income securities:
 U.S./government/ 

corporate bonds (c)

  High yield bonds (d)

 International/government/ 

corporate bonds (e)
Insurance contracts (f)
Other types of investments:
  Hedge funds (g)
  Private equity funds (h)

$  13.5

$  13.5

—

277.2

110.7

72.5
29.3

24.7
1.0

18.5
4.9

129.5

$147.7

110.7

—

72.5
—

24.7
—

—
—

—
29.3

—
1.0

—
—

—

—

—

—
—

—
—

$54.7
5.0

$59.7

—

—

—
—

—

—

—

—

—
—

—
—

$18.5
4.9

$23.4

Total investments

$552.3

$ 350.9

$178.0

58

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Equity securities in the U.S. plan included McCormick stock with a 
fair value of $33.0 million (0.5 million shares and 5.7% of total U.S. 
pension plan assets) and $31.6 million (0.5 million shares and 5.7%  
of total U.S. pension plan assets) at November 30, 2014 and 2013, 
respectively. Dividends paid on these shares were $0.7 million in 
2014 and $0.6 million in 2013.

Pension benefit payments in our most significant plans are made 
from assets of the pension plans. It is anticipated that future  
benefit payments for the U.S. plans for the next 10 fiscal years  
will be as follows:

(millions)

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020–2024

United States 
expected payments

$  24.5
25.5
27.4
30.1
31.7
195.4

It is anticipated that future benefit payments for the international 
plans for the next 10 fiscal years will be as follows:

(millions)

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020–2024

International 
expected payments

$  8.5
8.9
9.9
10.8
12.3
79.7

U.S. Defined Contribution Retirement Plans 
For the U.S. defined contribution retirement plan, we match 100%  
of a participant’s contribution up to the first 3% of the participant’s 
salary, and 50% of the next 2% of the participant’s salary. In addi-
tion we make contributions for U.S. employees not covered by the 
defined benefit plan. Some of our smaller U.S. subsidiaries sponsor 
separate 401(k) retirement plans. Our contributions charged to 
expense under all 401(k) retirement plans were $7.7 million, $7.7  
million and $7.4 million in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

At the participant’s election, 401(k) retirement plans held 2.3 million 
shares of McCormick stock, with a fair value of $164.9 million, at 
November 30, 2014. Dividends paid on these shares in 2014 were 
$3.5 million.

Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions 
We currently provide postretirement medical and life insurance  
benefits to certain U.S. employees who were covered under the 
active employees’ plan and retire after age 55 with at least five 
years of service. The subsidy provided under these plans is based 
primarily on age at date of retirement. These benefits are not pre-
funded but paid as incurred. Employees hired after December 31, 
2008 are not eligible for a company subsidy. They are eligible for 
coverage on an access-only basis.

Our other postretirement benefit expense follows:

(millions)

  2014     2013  

Service cost
Interest costs
Amortization of prior service costs
Amortization of losses
Special termination benefits

Postretirement benefit expense

$3.6
4.3
—
—
—

$7.9

2012  

$  4.0
4.9
(4.0)
—
(0.1)

$  5.1
4.1
(1.2)
1.4
—

$  9.4

$  4.8

Rollforwards of the benefit obligation, fair value of plan assets and  
a reconciliation of the plans’ funded status at November 30, the 
measurement date, follow:

(millions)

  2014    

2013  

Change in benefit obligation:
  Benefit obligation at beginning of year

  Service cost

Interest costs

  Employee contributions
  Demographic assumptions change
  Other plan assumptions
  Trend rate assumption change
  Discount rate change
  Actuarial gain
  Benefits paid

  Benefit obligation at end of year

Change in fair value of plan assets:
  Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

  Employer contributions
  Employee contributions
  Benefits paid

  Fair value of plan assets at end of year

$94.9
3.6
4.3
2.9
(5.8)
1.1
0.1
5.8
(2.3)
(8.3)

$96.3

—
$  5.4
2.9
(8.3)

—

$ 112.8
5.1
4.1
2.9
(8.1)
(1.5)
—
(8.7)
(3.3)
(8.4)

$  94.9

—
$  5.5
2.9
(8.4)

—

  Other postretirement benefit liability

$96.3

$  94.9

Estimated future benefit payments (net of employee contributions) 
for the next 10 fiscal years are as follows:

(millions)

2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020–2024

Retiree  
medical

Retiree life 
insurance

$  5.8
5.7
5.7
5.8
5.9
29.4

$1.1
1.1
1.2
1.2
1.2
6.3

Total

$  6.9
6.8
6.9
7.0
7.1
35.7

The assumed discount rate was 4.0% and 4.7% for 2014 and 2013, 
respectively.

For 2014, the assumed annual rate of increase in the cost of covered 
health care benefits is 7.0% (7.0% last year). It is assumed to 
decrease gradually to 5.0% in the year 2022 (5.0% in 2021 last year) 
and remain at that level thereafter. A one percentage point increase 
or decrease in the assumed health care cost trend rate would have 
had an immaterial effect on the benefit obligation and the total of 
service and interest cost components for 2014.

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 59

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
11. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION 

We have three types of stock-based compensation awards: restricted stock units (RSUs), stock options and company stock awarded as part of 
our long-term performance plan (LTPP) (formerly known as our mid-term incentive program or MTIP). Total stock-based compensation expense 
for 2014, 2013 and 2012 was $18.2 million, $18.7 million and $20.2 million, respectively. Total unrecognized stock-based compensation expense 
at November 30, 2014 was $18.9 million and the weighted-average period over which this will be recognized is 1.1 years. As of November 30, 
2014, we have 5.8 million shares remaining available for future issuance under our RSUs, stock option and LTPP award programs.

For all awards, forfeiture rates are considered in the calculation of compensation expense.

Below we have summarized the key terms and the methods of valuation and expense recognition for each of our stock-based compensation awards.

RSUs 
RSUs are valued at the market price of the underlying stock, discounted by foregone dividends, on the date of grant. Substantially all of the RSUs 
granted in 2014 vest over a three-year term or upon retirement. Prior to 2014, substantially all of the RSUs granted vested over a two-year term or 
upon retirement. Compensation expense is recorded in the income statement ratably over the shorter of the period until vested or the employee’s 
retirement eligibility date.

A summary of our RSU activity for the years ended November 30 follows:

(shares in thousands)

2014

2013

2012

Beginning of year
Granted
Vested
Forfeited

Outstanding—end of year

Weighted-
average 
price

$60.86
71.15
62.57
70.14

$67.60

Shares

161
180
(93)
(9)

239

Weighted-
average 
price

$49.65
71.60
50.91
59.25

$60.86

Shares

233
113
(147)
(7)

192

Weighted-
average 
price

$43.23
54.30
42.82
47.88

$49.65

Shares

192
89
(116)
(4)

161

Stock Options 
Stock options are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the stock on the date of grant. Substantially all of the options 
granted in 2014 vested ratably over a three-year period or upon retirement and are exercisable over a 10-year period. Prior to 2014, substantially  
all of the options granted vest ratably over a four-year period or upon retirement. Upon exercise of the option, shares are issued from our autho-
rized and unissued shares.

The fair value of the options is estimated with a lattice option pricing model which uses the assumptions in the table below. We believe the lattice 
model provides an appropriate estimate of fair value of our options as it allows for a range of possible outcomes over an option term and can be 
adjusted for changes in certain assumptions over time. Expected volatilities are based on the historical performance of our stock. We also use his-
torical data to estimate the timing and amount of option exercises and forfeitures within the valuation model. The expected term of the options is 
an output of the option pricing model and estimates the period of time that options are expected to remain unexercised. The risk-free interest rate 
is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. Compensation expense is calculated based on the fair value of the options 
on the date of grant. This compensation is recorded in the income statement ratably over the shorter of the period until vested or the employee’s 
retirement eligibility date.

The per share weighted-average fair value for all options granted was $9.48, $9.47 and $7.17 in 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These fair  
values were computed using the following range of assumptions for our various stock compensation plans for the years ended November 30:

Risk-free interest rates
Dividend yield
Expected volatility
Expected lives

2014

0.1–2.7%
2.1%
15.6–20.1%
5.8 years

2013

0.1–1.8%
1.9%
14.5–20.6%
6.2 years

2012

0.1–2.2%
2.3%
16.5–21.6%
6.1 years

Under our stock option plans, we may issue shares on a net basis at the request of the option holder. This occurs by netting the option cost in 
shares from the shares exercised.

60

 
   
 
 
 
 
   
 
A summary of our stock option activity for the years ended November 30 follows:

(shares in millions)

2014

2013

2012

Beginning of year
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited

Outstanding—end of year

Exercisable—end of year

Shares

Weighted-average 
exercise price

Shares

Weighted-average 
exercise price

Shares

Weighted-average 
exercise price

4.6
1.1
(0.8)
(0.1)

4.8

2.8

$47.73
71.12
37.19
67.22

54.17

$45.71

5.1
0.9
(1.3)
(0.1)

4.6

2.7

$40.06
71.60
34.11
57.33

47.73

$39.62

6.6
0.9
(2.4)
—

5.1

2.7

$34.98
54.27
31.43
—

40.06

$34.99

As of November 30, 2014, the intrinsic value (the difference between the exercise price and the market price) for all options currently outstanding 
was $96.5 million and for options currently exercisable was $81.0 million. At November 30, 2014, the differences between options outstanding and 
options expected to vest and their related weighted-average exercise prices, aggregate intrinsic values and weighted-average remaining lives 
were not material. The total intrinsic value of all options exercised during the years ended November 30, 2014, 2013 and 2012 was $25.9 million, 
$43.7 million and $62.8 million, respectively. A summary of our stock options outstanding and exercisable at November 30, 2014 follows:

(shares in millions)

Range of 
exercise price

$20.00–$40.00
$40.01–$60.00
$60.01–$80.00

Options outstanding

Options exercisable

Shares

Weighted-average  
remaining life (yrs)

Weighted-average 
exercise price

Shares

Weighted-average 
remaining life (yrs)

Weighted-average 
exercise price

1.4
1.5
1.9

4.8

3.9
6.8
8.9

6.5

$35.71
  50.77
  71.33

$54.17

1.4
1.0
0.4

2.8

3.9
6.7
8.5

5.1

$35.71
50.24
71.48

$45.71

LTPP
Our LTPP delivers awards in a combination of cash and company stock. The stock compensation portion of the LTPP awards shares of company stock 
if certain company performance objectives are met at the end of a three-year period. These awards are valued at the market price of the underlying 
stock on the date of grant. Compensation expense is recorded in the income statement ratably over the three-year period of the program based on 
the number of shares ultimately expected to be awarded using our estimate of the most likely outcome of achieving the performance objectives.

A summary of the LTPP award activity for the years ended November 30 follows:

(shares in thousands)

2014

2013

2012

Beginning of the year
Granted
Vested
Performance adjustment
Forfeited

Outstanding—end of the year

Shares

Weighted-average
price

Shares

Weighted-average
price

Shares

Weighted-average
price

334
105
(118)
(55)
(35)

231

$51.73
69.04
44.47
48.78
65.42

$61.94

240
94
—
—
—

334

$46.63
64.74
—
—
—

$51.73

120
120
—
—
—

240

$44.47
48.78
—
—
—

$46.63

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 61

 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
12. INCOME TAXES

The provision for income taxes consists of the following:

(millions)

Income taxes
  Current

  Federal
  State

International

  Deferred
  Federal
  State

International

2014 

2013 

2012 

$  91.3
11.3
37.2

139.8

2.8
0.3
3.0

6.1

$  96.4
10.3
42.2

148.9

(0.1)
(0.4)
(14.8)

(15.3)

$  79.4
10.1
26.0

115.5

21.3
4.0
(1.0)

24.3

Total income taxes

$145.9

$133.6

$139.8

The components of income from consolidated operations before 
income taxes follow:

(millions)

Pretax income
  United States
International

2014 

2013 

2012 

$333.2
221.2

$554.4

$351.2
148.2

$499.4

$366.2
159.9

$526.1

A reconciliation of the U.S. federal statutory rate with the effective 
tax rate follows: 

Federal statutory tax rate
State income taxes, net of  

federal benefits

International tax at different  
  effective rates
U.S. tax on remitted and  
  unremitted earnings
U.S. manufacturing deduction
Changes in prior year tax contingencies
Other, net

 2014 

35.0%

 2013 

 2012 

35.0%

35.0%

1.3

(7.0)

0.4
(1.6)
(2.0)
0.2

1.2

(6.9)

—
(1.8)
0.3
(1.0)

1.7

(6.5)

(2.0)
(1.6)
(0.1)
0.1

Total

26.3%

26.8%

26.6%

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are comprised of the following: 

(millions)

Deferred tax assets
  Employee benefit liabilities
  Other accrued liabilities

Inventory

  Tax loss and credit carryforwards
  Other
  Valuation allowance

Deferred tax liabilities
  Depreciation

Intangible assets

  Other

Net deferred tax liability

62

2014  

2013  

$145.0
23.9
10.8
38.9
11.7
(21.8)

$110.3
23.5
11.1
41.4
9.5
(21.2)

208.5

174.6

38.8
192.6
8.7

240.1

45.3
178.2
7.4

230.9

$ (31.6)

$ (56.3)

At November 30, 2014, our non-U.S. subsidiaries have tax loss carry-
forwards of $142.3 million. Of these carryforwards, $26.9 million 
expire through 2016, $48.5 million from 2017 through 2025 and 
$66.9 million may be carried forward indefinitely.

At November 30, 2014, our non-U.S. subsidiaries have capital loss 
carryforwards of $5.9 million. All of these carryforwards may be 
carried forward indefinitely.

At November 30, 2014, we have tax credit carryforwards of $17.5  
million, of which $3.4 million expire in 2020, $0.6 million in 2021  
and $13.5 million in 2022.

A valuation allowance has been provided to record deferred tax 
assets at their net realizable value based on a more likely than not 
criteria. The $0.6 million net increase in the valuation allowance was 
mainly due to the recognition of deferred tax assets related to sub-
sidiaries net operating losses which are now more likely than not to 
be realized, offset by additional valuation allowance related to 
losses generated in other subsidiaries in 2014 which may not be 
realized in future periods.

U.S. income taxes are not provided for unremitted earnings of inter-
national subsidiaries and affiliates where our intention is to reinvest 
these earnings permanently. Unremitted earnings of such entities 
were $1.25 billion at November 30, 2014. Upon distribution of these  
earnings, we could be subject to both U.S. income taxes and with-
holding taxes. Determination of the unrecognized deferred income 
tax liability is not practical because of the complexities involved 
with this hypothetical calculation.

The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of November 30, 
2014 and November 30, 2013 were $55.7 million and $58.0 million, 
respectively. If recognized, $45.6 million of these tax benefits would 
affect the effective tax rate.

The following table summarizes the activity related to our gross 
unrecognized tax benefits for the years ended November 30:

(millions)

Balance at beginning of year
Additions for current year tax positions
Additions for prior year tax positions
Reductions for prior year tax positions
Settlements
Statute expirations
Foreign currency translation

 2014    

 2013  

  2012  

$58.0
11.4
0.7
(9.5)
(3.5)
(0.7)
(0.7)

$46.7
10.3
2.2
—
—
(0.1)
(1.1)

$33.2
10.6
3.9
—
—
(1.2)
0.2

Balance at November 30

$55.7

$58.0

$46.7

We record interest and penalties on income taxes in income tax 
expense. We recognized interest and penalty expense of $0.5 mil-
lion, $1.3 million and $1.4 million for the years ended November 30, 
2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. As of November 30, 2014 and 
2013, we had accrued $5.0 million and $5.2 million, respectively, of 
interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits.

Tax settlements or statute of limitation expirations could result in a 
change to our uncertain tax positions. We believe that it is reason-
ably possible that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as 
of November 30, 2014 could decrease by approximately $2.1 million 
in the next 12 months as a result of various statute expirations, audit 
closures and/or tax settlements.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and vari-
ous state and non-U.S. jurisdictions. The open years subject to tax 
audits vary depending on the tax jurisdictions. In major jurisdictions, 
we are no longer subject to income tax audits by taxing authorities 
for years before 2007.

We reached the following tax settlements during 2014: (1) a settle-
ment with respect to the French taxing authority’s audits of the 
2007–2013 tax years; and (2) a settlement with respect to the 
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) examination of our U.S. federal 
income tax return for the 2007 and 2008 tax years.

We are under normal recurring tax audits in several of our major 
operations outside the U.S. While it is often difficult to predict the 
final outcome or the timing of resolution of any particular uncertain 
tax position, we believe that our reserves for uncertain tax positions 
are adequate to cover existing risks and exposures.

13. EARNINGS PER SHARE 

The reconciliation of shares outstanding used in the calculation  
of basic and diluted earnings per share for the years ended 
November 30 follows:

(millions)

Average shares outstanding—basic
Effect of dilutive securities:
  Stock options/RSUs/LTPP

  2014     2013  

2012

129.9

132.1

132.7

1.1

1.5

1.6

Average shares outstanding—diluted

131.0

133.6

134.3

The following table sets forth the stock options and RSUs for  
the years ended November 30 which were not considered in our 
earnings per share calculation since they were antidilutive.

(millions)

Antidilutive securities

14. CAPITAL STOCK 

  2014     2013  

2012

1.6

0.6

0.3

Holders of Common Stock have full voting rights except that (1) the 
voting rights of persons who are deemed to own beneficially 10%  
or more of the outstanding shares of Common Stock are limited to 
10% of the votes entitled to be cast by all holders of shares of 
Common Stock regardless of how many shares in excess of 10%  
are held by such person; (2) we have the right to redeem any or all 
shares of stock owned by such person unless such person acquires 
more than 90% of the outstanding shares of each class of our com-
mon stock; and (3) at such time as such person controls more than 
50% of the vote entitled to be cast by the holders of outstanding 
shares of Common Stock, automatically, on a share-for-share basis, 
all shares of Common Stock Non-Voting will convert into shares of 
Common Stock.

Holders of Common Stock Non-Voting will vote as a separate class on 
all matters on which they are entitled to vote. Holders of Common 
Stock Non-Voting are entitled to vote on reverse mergers and statu-
tory share exchanges where our capital stock is converted into other 
securities or property, dissolution of the company and the sale of 
substantially all of our assets, as well as forward mergers and  
consolidation of the company.

15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES 

During the normal course of our business, we are occasionally 
involved with various claims and litigation. Reserves are established 
in connection with such matters when a loss is probable and the 
amount of such loss can be reasonably estimated. At November 30, 
2014 and 2013, no material reserves were recorded. No reserves are 
established for losses which are only reasonably possible. The deter-
mination of probability and the estimation of the actual amount of 
any such loss is inherently unpredictable, and it is therefore possible 
that the eventual outcome of such claims and litigation could exceed 
the estimated reserves, if any. However, we believe that the likeli-
hood that any such excess might have a material adverse effect on 
our financial statements is remote.

16. BUSINESS SEGMENTS AND GEOGRAPHIC AREAS 

Business Segments 
We operate in two business segments: consumer and industrial.  
The consumer and industrial segments manufacture, market and  
distribute spices, seasoning mixes, condiments and other flavorful 
products throughout the world. Our consumer segment sells to retail 
outlets, including grocery, mass merchandise, warehouse clubs, dis-
count and drug stores under the “McCormick” brand and a variety of 
brands around the world, including “Lawry’s”, “Zatarain’s”, “Simply 
Asia”, “Thai Kitchen”, “Ducros”, “Vahiné”, “Schwartz”, “Club House”, 
“Kamis”, “Kohinoor” and “DaQiao”. Our industrial segment sells to 
food manufacturers and the foodservice industry both directly and 
indirectly through distributors.

In each of our segments, we produce and sell many individual  
products which are similar in composition and nature. With their  
primary attribute being flavor, we regard the products within each  
of our segments to be fairly homogenous. It is impracticable to seg-
regate and identify sales and profits for each of these individual 
product lines.

We measure segment performance based on operating income 
excluding special charges and loss on voluntary pension settlement 
as these activities are managed separately from the business seg-
ments. Although the segments are managed separately due to their 
distinct distribution channels and marketing strategies, manufactur-
ing and warehousing are often integrated to maximize cost efficien-
cies. We do not segregate jointly utilized assets by individual 
segment for internal reporting, evaluating performance or allocating 
capital. Therefore, asset-related information has been disclosed in 
the aggregate.

We have a large number of customers for our products. Sales to  
one of our consumer business customers, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 
accounted for 11% of consolidated sales in 2014, 12% of consoli-
dated sales in 2013 and 11% of consolidated sales in 2012. Sales to 
one of our industrial business customers, PepsiCo, Inc., accounted 
for 11% of consolidated sales in 2014, 2013 and 2012. 

Accounting policies for measuring segment operating income and 
assets are consistent with those described in note 1. Because of 
integrated manufacturing for certain products within the segments, 
products are not sold from one segment to another but rather inven-
tory is transferred at cost. Inter-segment sales are not material. 
Corporate assets include cash, deferred taxes, investments and  
certain fixed assets.

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 63

 
 
Business Segment Results

(millions)

2014
Net sales
Operating income excluding special charges
Income from unconsolidated operations
Goodwill
Assets
Capital expenditures
Depreciation and amortization

2013
Net sales
Operating income excluding special charges and loss on voluntary pension settlement
Income from unconsolidated operations
Goodwill
Assets
Capital expenditures
Depreciation and amortization

2012
Net sales
Operating income
Income from unconsolidated operations
Goodwill
Assets
Capital expenditures
Depreciation and amortization

Consumer

Industrial

Total 
segments

Corporate 
& other

Total

$2,625.5
474.3
28.2
1,581.1
—
—
—

$2,538.0
472.3
19.5
1,654.7
—
—
—

$2,415.3
456.1
17.3
1,551.0
—
—
—

$1,617.7
133.9
1.2
141.1

$4,243.2
608.2
29.4
1,722.2
— 4,169.7
108.6
—
71.7
—

$1,585.4
118.5
3.7
143.8

$4,123.4
590.8
23.2
1,798.5
— 4,142.9
84.2
—
74.8
—

$1,598.9
122.2
4.2
144.3

$4,014.2
578.3
21.5
1,695.3
— 3,912.2
88.8
—
75.1
—

— $4,243.2
608.2
—
29.4
—
1,722.2
—
4,414.3
$244.6
132.7
24.1
102.7
31.0

— $4,123.4
590.8
—
23.2
—
1,798.5
—
4,449.7
$306.8
99.9
15.7
106.0
31.2

— $4,014.2
578.3
—
21.5
—
1,695.3
—
4,165.4
$253.2
110.3
21.5
102.8
27.7

A reconciliation of operating income excluding special charges and 
loss on voluntary pension settlement (which we use to measure  
segment profitability) to operating income for the years ended 
November 30, 2014 and 2013 is as follows:

17. SUPPLEMENTAL FINANCIAL STATEMENT DATA 

Supplemental income statement, balance sheet and cash flow  
information follows:

(millions)

2014  

2013  

(millions)

Operating income excluding special charges and  

loss on voluntary pension settlement

Less: Special charges
Less: Loss on voluntary pension settlement

Operating income

$608.2
5.2
—

$603.0

$590.8
25.0
15.3

$550.5

Geographic Areas 
We have net sales and long-lived assets in the following  
geographic areas:

(millions)

2014
Net sales
Long-lived assets

2013
Net sales
Long-lived assets

2012
Net sales
Long-lived assets

United 
States

EMEA

Other 
countries

Total

$2,357.5
1,284.0

$930.8
920.0

$2,357.0
1,275.7

$883.4
989.2

$2,351.5
1,291.5

$860.5
956.6

$954.9
451.7

$883.0
443.6

$802.2
318.0

$4,243.2
2,655.7

$4,123.4
2,708.5

$4,014.2
2,566.1

Long-lived assets include property, plant and equipment,  
goodwill and intangible assets, net of accumulated depreciation  
and amortization.

64

Inventories
  Finished products
  Raw materials and work-in-process

Prepaid expenses
Other current assets

Property, plant and equipment
  Land and improvements
  Buildings
  Machinery and equipment
  Software
  Construction-in-progress
  Accumulated depreciation

Investments and other assets
Investments in affiliates
  Long-term investments
  Prepaid allowances
  Other assets

Other accrued liabilities
  Payroll and employee benefits
  Sales allowances
  Other

2014    

2013  

$ 303.2
410.6

$ 713.8

$  20.3
111.2

$ 131.5

$  57.6
346.4
700.7
301.7
75.0
(878.7)

$ 304.6
372.3

$ 676.9

$  37.7
97.1

$ 134.8

$  59.3
335.4
661.3
292.5
59.2
(831.1)

$ 602.7

$ 576.6

$ 156.3
113.0
17.3
55.8

$ 342.4

$ 132.8
127.3
219.0

$ 479.1

$ 160.6
103.4
19.3
87.7

$ 371.0

$ 120.4
124.5
216.8

$ 461.7

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
2014    

2013  

$182.3
89.5
108.2
47.3
41.5

$468.8

$101.0
88.2
139.3
53.0
38.4

$419.9

Operating income for the fourth quarter of 2013 included $25.0 mil-
lion for special charges related to EMEA reorganization activities 
and $15.3 million of loss on voluntary pension settlements. The after 
tax impact of these two items is $29.2 million and the basic and 
diluted earnings per share impact is $0.22.

Earnings per share are computed independently for each of the quar-
ters presented. Therefore, the sum of the quarters may not be equal 
to the full year earnings per share.

2014    

2013

2012

19. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

(millions)

Other long-term liabilities
  Pension
  Postretirement benefits
  Deferred taxes
  Unrecognized tax benefits
  Other

(millions)

Depreciation
Software amortization
Interest paid
Income taxes paid

$  67.7
20.0
50.0
129.0

$  67.5
23.6
54.2
106.3

$  63.6
23.7
54.7
103.3

Dividends paid per share were $1.48 in 2014, $1.36 in 2013 and 
$1.24 in 2012.

18. SELECTED QUARTERLY DATA (UNAUDITED) 

(millions except per share data)

First

  Second  

Third

Fourth  

2014
Net sales
Gross profit
Operating income
Net income
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
Dividends paid per share—
  Common Stock and  
  Common Stock Non-Voting
Market price—Common Stock

$993.4
391.5
124.6
82.5
0.63
0.62

$1,033.4
412.5
121.7
84.5
0.65
0.64

$1,042.8
420.1
157.3
122.9
0.95
0.94

$1,173.6
506.1
199.4
148.0
1.15
1.14

0.37

0.37

0.37

0.37

  High
  Low

70.00
62.80

72.00
65.57

73.04
66.00

73.18
65.90

Market price—Common Stock
  Non-Voting
  High
  Low

2013
Net sales
Gross profit
Operating income
Net income
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
Dividends paid per share—
  Common Stock and
  Common Stock Non-Voting
Market price—Common Stock

70.02
63.03

72.31
66.12

73.09
65.78

74.33
65.61

$934.4
361.7
112.0
76.0
0.57
0.57

$ 1,002.6
394.4
116.0
78.6
0.60
0.59

$ 1,016.4
407.6
148.4
104.4
0.79
0.78

$1,170.1
502.2
174.1
129.9
0.99
0.98

0.34

0.34

0.34

0.34

  High
  Low

67.28
61.03

74.60
68.08

73.41
66.85

70.00
63.29

Market price—Common Stock
  Non-Voting
  High
  Low

67.32
61.23

74.76
68.39

73.36
67.09

70.20
64.07

Operating income for the third and fourth quarters of 2014 included 
special charges of $2.3 million and $2.9 million, respectively, related 
to EMEA reorganization and other streamlining activities. For the 
third and fourth quarters of 2014, the after tax impact of these charges 
was $1.6 million and $2.1 million, respectively, and the basic and 
diluted earnings per share impact was $0.01 for the third quarter 
and $0.02 for the fourth quarter.

On January 26, 2015, we approved a voluntary early retirement plan 
to be offered to certain U.S. employees aged 55 years or older with 
at least ten years of service to the company. The cost of the voluntary 
early retirement plan (which includes enhanced separation benefits 
but does not include supplementary pension benefits) is expected  
to approximate $13 million, with the actual cost to be determined 
based upon acceptance by eligible employees, and to be recorded in 
the second quarter of 2015. This plan is part of a North American 
effectiveness initiative that, upon completion, is expected to generate 
cost savings of approximately $10 million in 2015 and annual cost 
savings of approximately $25 million beginning in 2016. We currently 
estimate the total cost to implement the North American effective-
ness initiative to approximate $20 million, including the cost of the 
voluntary early retirement plan and other actions necessary to achieve 
the cost savings previously described, consisting principally of sev-
erance and related benefits that will be paid in cash. We continue  
to evaluate changes to our organization structure in certain other 
locations to enable us to reduce fixed costs, simplify or improve  
processes, and improve our competitiveness.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH 
ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL 
DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive 
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness 
of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) 
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the period 
covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive 
Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of 
the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and proce-
dures were effective.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management’s report on our internal control over financial reporting 
and the report of our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 
on internal control over financial reporting are included in our 2014 
financial statements in Item 8 of this Report under the captions entitled 
“Report of Management” and “Report of Independent Registered 
Public Accounting Firm.” No change occurred in our “internal control 
over financial reporting” (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f)) during our last 
fiscal quarter which has materially affected or is reasonably likely to 
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 65

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PART III.

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND 
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Information responsive to this item is set forth in the sections titled 
“Corporate Governance,” “Election of Directors” and “Section 16(a) 
Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in our 2015 Proxy 
Statement, incorporated by reference herein, to be filed within 120 
days after the end of our fiscal year.

In addition to the executive officers described in the 2015 Proxy 
Statement incorporated by reference in this Item 10 of this Report, the 
following individuals are also executive officers of McCormick: Paul C. 
Beard, Cecile K. Perich, Jeffery D. Schwartz and Michael R. Smith.

Mr. Beard is 60 years old and, during the last five years, has held the 
following positions with McCormick: September 2013 to present—
Senior Vice President, Finance; January 2011 to September 2013—
President, Asia Pacific Zone; April 2008 to December 2010—Senior 
Vice President, Finance & Treasurer; March 2002 to April 2008—
Vice President, Finance.

Ms. Perich is 63 years old and, during the last five years, has held 
the following positions with McCormick: April 2010 to present—
Senior Vice President, Human Relations; January 2007 to April 
2010—Vice President, Human Relations.

Mr. Schwartz is 45 years old and, during the last five years, has  
held the following positions with McCormick: December 2014 to  
present—Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary; February 
2011 to December 2014—Associate General Counsel & Assistant 
Secretary; December 2009 to February 2011—Associate Counsel & 
Assistant Secretary.

Mr. Smith is 50 years old and, during the last five years, has held the  
following positions with McCormick: September 2014 to present—
Senior Vice President, Finance Capital Markets & Chief Financial Officer 
North America; May 2012 to September 2014—Chief Financial Officer 
& Vice President Finance EMEA; September 2011 to May 2012—Vice 
President, Treasury & Investor Relations; April 2005 to September 
2011—Vice President, Finance & Administration—U.S. Consumer.

We have adopted a code of ethics that applies to all employees, 
including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, 
principal accounting officer, and our Board of Directors. A copy  
of the code of ethics is available on our internet website at  

PART IV.

www.mccormickcorporation.com. We will satisfy the disclosure 
requirement under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding any material 
amendment to our code of ethics, and any waiver from a provision  
of our code of ethics that applies to our principal executive officer, 
principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, or persons 
performing similar functions, by posting such information on our 
website at the internet website address set forth above.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Information responsive to this item is incorporated herein by reference 
to the sections titled “Compensation of Directors,” “Compensation 
Discussion and Analysis,” “Compensation Committee Report,” 
“Summary Compensation Table,” “Grants of Plan-Based Awards,” 
“Narrative to the Summary Compensation Table,” “Outstanding 
Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End,” “Option Exercises and Stock 
Vested in Last Fiscal Year,” “Pension Benefits,” “Non-Qualified 
Deferred Compensation,” “Potential Payments Upon Termination or 
Change in Control,” “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider 
Participation” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in the 
2015 Proxy Statement.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL 
OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED 
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Information responsive to this item is incorporated herein by refer-
ence to the sections titled “Principal Stockholders,” “Election of 
Directors” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information” in the 2015 
Proxy Statement.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED 
TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Information responsive to this item is incorporated herein by  
reference to the section entitled “Corporate Governance” in  
the 2015 Proxy Statement.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Information responsive to this item is incorporated herein by  
reference to the section titled “Report of Audit Committee and  
Fees of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the  
2015 Proxy Statement.

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

List of documents filed as part of this Report.

1. Consolidated Financial Statements

The Consolidated Financial Statements for McCormick & Company, 
Incorporated and related notes, together with the Report of Manage-
ment, and the Report of Ernst & Young LLP dated January 29, 2015, 
are included herein in Part II, Item 8.

2. Consolidated Financial Statement Schedule

Supplemental Financial Schedule:

66

Schedules other than that listed above are omitted because of the 
absence of the conditions under which they are required or because 
the information called for is included in the consolidated financial 
statements or notes thereto.

3. Exhibits required to be filed by Item 601 of Regulation S­K

The information called for by this item is incorporated herein by  
reference from the Exhibit Index included in this Report.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, McCormick has duly caused this report on Form 10-K 
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

SIGNATURES

McCORMICK & COMPANY, INCORPORATED

By:

/s/    AlAn D. Wilson

Alan D. Wilson

Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

January 29, 2015

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of 
McCormick and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Principal Executive Officer:

By:

/s/    AlAn D. Wilson

Alan D. Wilson

Principal Financial Officer:

By:

/s/    GorDon M. stetz, Jr.

Gordon M. Stetz, Jr.

Principal Accounting Officer:

Chairman & Chief Executive Officer

January 29, 2015

Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

January 29, 2015

By:

/s/    ChristinA M. MCMullen

Christina M. McMullen

Vice President & Controller
Chief Accounting Officer

January 29, 2015

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 67

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons, being a majority 
of the Board of Directors of McCormick & Company, Incorporated, on the date indicated:

SIGNATURES

DATE:

January 29, 2015

January 29, 2015

January 29, 2015

January 29, 2015

January 29, 2015

January 29, 2015

January 29, 2015

January 29, 2015

January 29, 2015

January 29, 2015

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS:

/s/    John P. BilBrey

John P. Bilbrey

/s/    J. MiChAel FitzPAtriCk

J. Michael Fitzpatrick

/s/    FreeMAn A. hrABoWski, iii

Freeman A. Hrabowski, III

/s/    PAtriCiA little

Patricia Little

/s/    MiChAel D. MAnGAn

Michael D. Mangan

/s/    MArGAret M.V. Preston

Margaret M.V. Preston

/s/    GorDon M. stetz, Jr.

Gordon M. Stetz, Jr.

/s/    WilliAM e. steVens

William E. Stevens

/s/    JACques tAPiero

Jacques Tapiero

/s/    AlAn D. Wilson

Alan D. Wilson

68

Supplemental Financial Schedule II Consolidated

McCORMICK & COMPANY, INCORPORATED 
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS 
(IN MILLIONS)

Column A

Description

Deducted from asset accounts:
  Year ended November 30, 2014:

  Allowance for doubtful receivables
  Valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets

Deducted from asset accounts:
  Year ended November 30, 2013:

  Allowance for doubtful receivables
  Valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets

Deducted from asset accounts:
  Year ended November 30, 2012:

  Allowance for doubtful receivables
  Valuation allowance on net deferred tax assets

Column B

Column C Additions

Column D

Column E

Balance at 
Beginning of 
Period

Charged to 
Costs and 
Expenses

Charged to 
Other 
Accounts

Deductions

Balance at  
End of Period

$  4.1
21.2

$25.3

$  4.0
27.5

$31.5

$  4.5
26.6

$31.1

$  1.1
3.0

$  4.1

$1.5
5.2

$6.7

$0.7
2.3

$3.0

$(0.9)
(1.4)

$(2.3)

$ (0.1)
(1.6)

$ (1.7)

—
$  0.8

$  0.8

$   (0.3)
(1.0)

$   (1.3)

$  (1.3)
(9.9)

$(11.2)

$  (1.2)
(2.2)

$  (3.4)

$    4.0
21.8

$  25.8

$  4.1
21.2

$25.3

$  4.0
27.5

$31.5

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 69

 
 
 
 
 
 
The following exhibits are attached or incorporated herein by reference:

Exhibit Number

Description

EXHIBIT INDEX

(3)

(i)

Articles of Incorporation and By-Laws

Restatement of Charter of McCormick & Company, Incorporated 
dated April 16, 1990

Articles of Amendment to Charter of McCormick & Company, 
Incorporated dated April 1, 1992

Articles of Amendment to Charter of McCormick & Company, 
Incorporated dated March 27, 2003

(ii)

By-Laws

By-Laws of McCormick & Company, Incorporated  
Amended and Restated on June 26, 2012

Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4 of Registration Form 
S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-39582 as filed with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 25, 1991.

Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4 of Registration Form 
S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-59842 as filed with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 19, 1993.

Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4 of Registration Form 
S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-104084 as filed with the 
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2003.

Incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3(ii) of McCormick’s Form 
10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2012, File No. 1-14920, as filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 2, 2012.

(4)

Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including indentures

(i)

(ii)

(iii)

(iv)

(v)

(vi)

(vii)

(viii)

(ix)

See Exhibit 3 (Restatement of Charter and By-Laws)

Summary of Certain Exchange Rights, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 of McCormick’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended 
August 31, 2001, File No. 0-748, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 12, 2001.

Indenture dated December 5, 2000 between McCormick and SunTrust Bank, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4(iii) of 
McCormick’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2003, File No. 1-14920, as filed with the Securities and Exchange 
Commission on October 14, 2003.

Indenture dated December 7, 2007 between McCormick and The Bank of New York, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1  
of McCormick’s Form 8-K dated December 4, 2007, File No. 0-748, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on 
December 10, 2007.

Indenture dated July 8, 2011 between McCormick and U.S. Bank National Association, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 of 
McCormick’s Form 8-K dated July 5, 2011, File No. 1-14920, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 8, 2011.

Form of 5.20% notes due 2015, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.2 of McCormick’s Form 8-K dated December 1, 2005, File 
No. 0-748, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 6, 2005.

Form of 5.75% notes due 2017, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.2 of McCormick’s Form 8-K dated December 4, 2007, File 
No. 0-748, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 10, 2007.

Form of 3.90% notes due 2021, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.2 of McCormick’s Form 8-K dated July 5, 2011, File No. 
1-14920, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 8, 2011.

Form of 3.50% notes due 2023, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.2 of McCormick’s Form 8-K dated August 14, 2013, File 
No. 1-14920, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 19, 2013.

(10)

Material contracts

(i) McCormick’s supplemental pension plan for certain senior  

Filed herewith

and executive officers, amended and restated with an effec-
tive date of January 1, 2005, adopted by the Compensation 
Committee of the Board of Directors on November 28, 2008.

(ii)

(iii)

The 2001 Stock Option Plan, in which officers and certain other management employees participate, is set forth on pages 33 
through 36 of McCormick’s definitive Proxy Statement dated February 15, 2001, File No. 1-14920, as filed with the Securities and 
Exchange Commission on February 14, 2001, and incorporated by reference herein.*

2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan, in which officers and certain other management employees participate, is set forth in Exhibit A  
of McCormick’s definitive Proxy Statement dated February 17, 2004, File No. 1-14920, as filed with the Securities and Exchange 
Commission on February 17, 2004, and incorporated by reference herein.*

70

(iv)

(v)

(vi)

(vii)

(viii)

(ix)

(x)

(xi)

(xii)

(xiii)

(xiv)

(xv)

Exhibit Number

Description

2004 Directors’ Non-Qualified Stock Option Plan, provided to members of McCormick’s Board of Directors who are not also employ-
ees of McCormick, is set forth in Exhibit B of McCormick’s definitive Proxy Statement dated February 17, 2004, File No. 1-14920, as 
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17, 2004, and incorporated by reference herein.*

Directors’ Share Ownership Program, provided to members of McCormick’s Board of Directors who are not also employees of 
McCormick, is set forth on page 28 of McCormick’s definitive Proxy Statement dated February 17, 2004, File No. 1-14920, as filed 
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 17, 2004, and incorporated by reference herein.*

Deferred Compensation Plan, as restated on January 1, 2000, and amended on August 29, 2000, September 5, 2000 and May 16, 
2003, in which directors, officers and certain other management employees participate, a copy of which Plan document and 
amendments was attached as Exhibit 10(viii) of McCormick’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended August 31, 2003, File No. 1-14920,  
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 14, 2003, and incorporated by reference herein.*

2005 Deferred Compensation Plan, amended and restated with an effective date of January 1, 2005, in which directors, officers and 
certain other management employees participate, which agreement is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 4.1 of McCormick’s 
Form S-8, Registration No. 333-155775, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 28, 2008.*

The 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan, in which directors, officers and certain other management employees participate, is set forth in 
Exhibit A of McCormick’s definitive Proxy Statement dated February 20, 2008, File No. 1-14920, as filed with the Securities and 
Exchange Commission on February 20, 2008, and incorporated by reference herein, as amended by Amendment No. 1 thereto, which 
Amendment is incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(xi) of McCormick’s 10-K for the fiscal year ended November 30, 2008, File 
No. 1-14920, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on January 28, 2009.*

The 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan, in which directors, officers and certain other management employees participate, is incorporated 
by reference from Exhibit 4.1 of McCormick’s Form S-8, Registration No. 333-187703, as filed with the Securities and Exchange 
Commission on April 3, 2013.*

Form of Mid-Term Incentive Program Agreement, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.10 of McCormick’s Form 10-Q for the 
quarter ended May 31, 2013, File No. 1-14920, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 28, 2013.

Form of Restricted Stock Units Agreement, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.11 of McCormick’s Form 10-Q for the quarter 
ended May 31, 2013, File No. 1-14920, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 28, 2013.

Form of Restricted Stock Units Agreement for Directors, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.12 of McCormick’s Form 10-Q  
for the quarter ended May 31, 2013, File No. 1-14920, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 28, 2013.

Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.13 of McCormick’s Form 10-Q for the 
quarter ended May 31, 2013, File No. 1-14920, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 28, 2013.

Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for Directors, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10.14 of McCormick’s Form 
10-Q for the quarter ended May 31, 2013, File No. 1-14920, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 28, 2013.

Form of Indemnification Agreement, incorporated by reference from Exhibit 10(xv) of McCormick’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended 
February 28, 2014, File No. 1-14920, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 2014.

(21)

(23)

(31)

(32)

(101)

Subsidiaries of McCormick

Consents of experts and counsel

Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications

Section 1350 Certifications

Filed herewith

Filed herewith

Filed herewith

Filed herewith

The following financial information from the Annual Report on Form 10-K of McCormick for the year ended November 30, 2014, fur-
nished electronically herewith, and formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets; 
(ii) Consolidated Statements of Income; (iii) Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income; (iv) Consolidated Statement of 
Stockholders’ Equity; (v) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (vi) Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

McCormick hereby undertakes to furnish to the Securities and Exchange Commission, upon its request, copies of additional instru-
ments of McCormick with respect to long-term debt that involve an amount of securities that do not exceed 10 percent of the total 
assets of McCormick and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis, pursuant to Regulation S-K, Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A).

END OF ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 71

Investor Services Plan (Dividend Reinvestment and  
Direct Purchase Plan)
We offer an Investor Services Plan which provides sharehold-
ers of record the opportunity to automatically reinvest divi-
dends, make optional cash purchases of stock, place stock 
certificates into safekeeping and sell shares. Individuals who 
are not current shareholders may purchase their initial shares 
directly through the Plan. All transactions are subject to the 
limitations set forth in the Plan prospectus, which may be 
obtained by contacting our transfer agent.

Registered Shareholder Inquiries
For questions on your account, statements, dividend payments, 
reinvestment and direct deposit, and for address changes, 
lost certificates, stock transfers, ownership changes or other 
admin istrative matters, contact our transfer agent.

Transfer Agent and Registrar
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Shareowner Services
1110 Centre Pointe Curve, Suite 101
Mendota Heights, MN 55120-4100

(877) 778-6784 or (651) 450-4064

  shareowneronline.com

Annual Meeting
The annual meeting of shareholders will be held at 10 a.m., 
Wednesday, March 25, 2015, at Martin’s Valley Mansion,  
594 Cranbrook Road, Hunt Valley, MD 21030.

Electronic Delivery of Annual Report and Proxy Statement
If you would like to receive next year’s annual report and 
proxy statement electronically, you may enroll on the  
website below:
  http://enroll.icsdelivery.com/mkc

Trademarks
Use of ® or ™ in this annual report indicates trademarks 
including those owned or used by McCormick & Company, 
Incorporated and its subsidiaries and affiliates.

I N V ES TO R   I N F O R M AT I O N

World Headquarters
McCormick & Company, Incorporated
18 Loveton Circle
Sparks, MD 21152-6000
U.S.A.

(410) 771-7301

  www.mccormickcorporation.com

Stock Listing
New York Stock Exchange
Symbol: MKC

Anticipated Dividend Dates—2015 
Record Date 
  4/06/15 
  7/13/15 
10/13/15 
12/31/15 

Payment Date
  4/20/15
  7/27/15
10/27/15
  1/15/16

McCormick has paid dividends every year since 1925.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Ernst & Young LLP
621 East Pratt Street
Baltimore, MD 21202

Investor Inquiries
Our investor website, ir.mccormick.com, contains our annual 
reports, Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) filings, 
press releases, webcasts, corporate governance principles 
and other information.

To obtain without cost a copy of the annual report filed  
with the SEC on Form 10-K or for general questions about 
McCormick or the information in our reports, press releases 
and other filings, contact Investor Relations at the world 
headquarters address, investor website or telephone:

Report ordering:
  Proxy materials: (800) 579-1639
  Other materials: (800) 424-5855, (410) 771-7537
  or ir.mccormick.com

Investor and securities analysts’ inquiries:

(410) 771-7244

72

 
 
 
Corporate Social Responsibility 

At McCormick, we are growing our business globally while driving positive change to the 
environment, within our communities and for our employees.

Empowering People and 
Improving Communities
We commemorated our 125th anniver-
sary by celebrating the role flavor plays 
in all of our lives, inspiring flavorful  
conversation and giving back to com-
munities around the world. Through the 
Flavor of Together program, McCormick 
donated $1.25 million—$1 for every story 
shared—to United Way Worldwide to 
help feed those in need.

Investing in Quality, 
Sustainable Agriculture
We are committed to supporting the 
growing communities where we source 
our spices and herbs. For example, 
vanilla farmers in Madagascar are 
improving their profits through our 
efforts to improve their farming techniques and form  
a cooperative for drying the vanilla beans.

Providing Healthy 
Flavor Solutions

At McCormick we believe  
flavor is the missing link to 
healthier eating by helping  
food taste better and be better 
for you. We offer hundreds  
of salt-free or reduced sodium 
items, introduced gluten-free 
products and expanded our 
employee wellness programs. 
The McCormick Science Institute 
is supporting scientific research 
on the health benefits of herbs 
and spices for consumers and 
health professionals.

Improving Operational 
Impact and Efficiencies
We are working to improve our 
environmental impact. We have 
made particular progress lowering 
solid waste, which is down 50%  
since 2009, on a per unit basis.

McCormick & Company | 2014 Annual Report 73

m
o
c
.
s
r
o
n
n
o
c
-
n
a
r
r
u
c
.
w
w
w
/

.
c
n

I

,
s
r
o
n
n
o
C
&
n
a
r
r
u
C
y
b
n
g
i
s
e
D

t
r
o
p
e
R

l

a
u
n
n
A

www.flavoroftogether.com

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
M
c
C
o
r

m
i
c
k

&

C
o
m
p
a
n
y

2
0
1
4

A
n
n
u
a

l

R
e
p
o
r
t

McCormick & Company, Incorporated
18 Loveton Circle, Sparks, Maryland 21152-6000 U.S.A.
410.771.7301 | www.mccormickcorporation.com