Quarterlytics / Consumer Cyclical / Restaurants / McDonald’s

McDonald’s

mcd · NYSE Consumer Cyclical
Claim this profile
Ticker mcd
Exchange NYSE
Sector Consumer Cyclical
Industry Restaurants
Employees 10,000+
← All annual reports
FY2013 Annual Report · McDonald’s
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
2013 Annual Report

2013 Highlights

 Global Comparable 
 Sales Growth

 Earnings Per  
 Share Growth

 0.2%

4%

Average Number of  
Customers Served Every Day

 70 million

Our customers are at the heart of all we do. 

That’s why we work passionately to serve great-tasting food and 

beverages to more customers, more often; to be convenient and 

affordable; to provide opportunities that open doors; and to be a 

good neighbor... in our local communities and around the world.

To Our Valued Shareholders:

It’s a privilege to serve great-tasting, high-quality food 
and beverages with the speed and convenience expected 
by almost 70 million daily customers in 119 countries —  
and we don’t take it for granted.

Our unique business model — comprised of the  
best franchisees, excellent suppliers and talented 
employees — is the reason McDonald’s is the world’s 
largest quick-service restaurant brand. It’s also the 
reason we continued to grow in 2013. Global comparable 
sales increased 0.2%, and Systemwide sales were up 
3%*. We increased operating income 3%* and diluted 
earnings per share 4%*. And, we invested approximately 
$2.8 billion in new and existing restaurants. 

We also remain committed to returning all free cash flow 
to shareholders. In 2013, we returned $4.9 billion to 
shareholders through dividends and share repurchases.

Though McDonald’s continued to grow, our performance 
fell short of our high expectations this past year. 
Challenging conditions — including a flat or contracting 
informal eating out category in most of our major 
markets, increased competitive activity and consumer 
price sensitivity — impacted our results. In addition, 
some of our customer-facing initiatives didn’t generate 
the comparable sales lift and incremental guest visits 
needed to overcome external pressures in today’s 
highly fragmented marketplace. 

We’re addressing near-term performance by optimizing 
current initiatives for broader reach and better execution, 
while appropriately investing to meet future demand. 
As we look forward, I remain confident in the underlying 
strength of our System and business model. Yes, for 
us, this is about our scale. It’s also about our sizeable 
marketing presence, our industry-leading cash flow 
and the efficiencies we’re able to capture as a result. 

Building on our strengths to generate 
enduring, profitable growth

Our desire to ensure the McDonald’s experience 
consistently delivers on our trademark QSC&V — 

Quality, Service, Cleanliness & Value — remains a  
top priority. We’re also building on the competitive 
advantages inherent in our business model and 
focusing on the drivers within our control. Around  
the world we’re:

• Balancing core classics and new menu 

choices. We’re focusing on timeless favorites such 
as the Big Mac, Egg McMuffin and our World Famous 
Fries while broadening our appeal with new menu 
options in the categories where we believe the most 
growth opportunity exists: beef, chicken, beverages 
and breakfast. 

• Focused on improving customer service. We 

often say that the interaction between our customers 
and our crew at the front counter or drive-thru is the 
“moment of truth.” Emphasizing important elements of 
the service experience — like the staffing, scheduling 
and positioning of our crew — enables us to deliver 
at that all-important moment, and also improves the 
restaurant’s overall capacity for change.

• Ensuring we provide affordable options across 
our menu. We are strengthening our value platforms 
as we maintain an emphasis on this foundational 
element of our brand promise and a key driver of the 
customer experience.

• Keeping our restaurants contemporary.  

With more than 1,500 re-images in 2013, nearly 60% 
of McDonald’s restaurants now have more modern 
interiors and exteriors.

• Growing to the real market opportunity.  

We opened more than 1,400 restaurants in both 
established and emerging markets last year.

As our customers evolve, so must we. We’re drawing 
on deeper consumer insights to better understand 
their changing preferences. And, we’re applying these 
learnings across all our actions — from restaurant 
execution and operations innovation to marketing  
and menu. 

* in constant currencies

McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report   |   i

Giving customers more reasons  
to choose McDonald’s, more often

We’re placing greater emphasis on strengthening our 
relationship with our customers. We’re focused on what 
motivates them — and closely aligning our global growth 
priorities with the reasons they choose McDonald’s. 
That means serving great-tasting food and beverages, 
creating memorable experiences within and beyond 
our restaurants, and offering unparalleled convenience 
from a brand they respect and trust. 

While our growth priorities are a global framework, 
markets have different areas of focus based on their 
customers’ needs. Our decentralized approach is  
truly an enviable local market structure that provides 
grass-roots knowledge to help us better execute  
local initiatives and programs that resonate with  
our customers.

For example, the U.S. is focusing on breakfast by 
building on the advances we made in 2013 with  
the introduction of the delicious Egg White Delight 
McMuffin — while also enhancing customer service. 
Europe continues to strategically grow the McCafé 
brand, emphasize affordability through mid-priced 
bundles like France’s two-item Le Casse Croute, and 
build on investments in technology to advance digital 
efforts within the context of our newly formed global 
digital strategy. And, in Asia/Pacific, Middle East and 
Africa, we’re concentrating on getting the right value 
platforms in place and growing brand extensions such 
as delivery and McCafé. Our ability to learn, share  
and scale best thinking across geographies is truly a 
testament to our unique business model.

Making an impact, growing our business

Our brand and our business are inextricably linked. We 
are excited about the more focused and ambitious way 
we’re leveraging our brand as we accelerate our growth.

The work we’re doing across the broad spectrum of 
social responsibility and sustainability underpins our 
belief that holistic and outcome-based actions can 
deliver the most meaningful impact for our customers 

and the business. I’m especially proud of the advances 
we made last year. We partnered with the Alliance  
for a Healthier Generation, founded by the American 
Heart Association and the Clinton Foundation, and 
committed to increase customers’ access to fruit and 
vegetables in 20 of our top markets. Working together 
with organizations, including the World Wildlife Fund, 
we advanced our commitment to sustainable sourcing, 
including the eventual purchase of sustainable beef. 
And, as founding members of the Global Roundtable 
for Sustainable Beef, we’re helping to develop globally 
accepted principles and criteria. 

Of course, we never forget that it’s our people who 
make the difference — to us as a company, and to our 
approximately 70 million daily customers. Whether we’re 
providing a teenager with a first job or equipping a new 
manager with skills to run one of our 35,000 restaurants, 
we’re honored to provide resources that open the doors 
of opportunity for learning, training and advancement 
to the estimated 1.8 million employees in our company- 
owned and franchised restaurants worldwide. 

Leading in new ways

In today’s rapidly shifting marketplace, great brands like 
McDonald’s must lead in new ways. While change is 
our biggest challenge, it’s also our greatest opportunity. 
Change is our chance to get better. Stronger. Even 
more relevant and memorable to the customers we 
serve. That’s our commitment, because our customers 
are the heart and soul of who we are, as one System.

On behalf of the entire McDonald’s System, thank you 
for your support and confidence in our ongoing effort to 
deliver strong shareholder value. We’re grateful for your 
partnership and investment in our enduring brand —  
and we’re committed to satisfying each customer who 
chooses McDonald’s.

Sincerely, 

Don Thompson 
President and CEO

ii   |   McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report

 
 
 
Dear Fellow Shareholders:

Amid a still challenging global environment, we 
continued working to deliver an outstanding experience 
for our customers. Guided by the Plan to Win and our 
global growth priorities, our entire System of franchisees, 
suppliers and employees strived to raise the bar on 
what drives our success — from our menu and service 
to our convenience and value. 

Your Board of Directors remains confident in the actions 
McDonald’s is taking to manage the business for the 
long term while navigating our near-term challenges. 
We are equally confident in the Company’s strong 
leadership — epitomized by CEO Don Thompson and 
his global leadership team. Don is a skilled leader who 
understands this brand and the steps we must take  
to build an even deeper bond with all of our customers 
around the world.

We recognize that as the marketplace continues to 
move quickly, so must our System — by always listening 
to our customers and continuously adapting to meet 
their needs. With this charge before us, we are 
committed to greater innovation, stronger execution 
and enhancing our restaurant experience.

The future holds great promise and potential for our 
brand, as we work to seize the still sizeable opportunities 
around us to be more accessible, more relevant,  
and ultimately more valuable in the daily lives of our 
customers. Driven by management’s strong leadership, 
strategies and our committed employees, we are 
confident that McDonald’s will continue to become a 
stronger, more profitable company over the long term. 

McDonald’s Board of diverse, experienced business 
leaders remains committed to overseeing the Company’s 
direction and enhancing shareholder value. We embrace 
our role in helping this great brand continue to succeed —  
through its long-standing formula of commitment to the 
customer, hard work and strong values.

On behalf of the entire Board of Directors, it is an honor 
and privilege to serve you, our shareholders.

Very truly yours,

Andy McKenna 
Chairman

McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report   |   iii

 
 
 
THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

 ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013 
or
 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                     to                    

Commission File Number 1-5231

McDONALD’S CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)

One McDonald’s Plaza
Oak Brook, Illinois
(Address of principal executive offices)

36-2361282
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

60523
(Zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (630) 623-3000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Common stock, $.01 par value

Name of each exchange
on which registered

New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes 

  No 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during 
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements 
for the past 90 days.  Yes 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to 
be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required 

  No 

  No 

to submit and post such files).  Yes 
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best 
of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this 

  No 

Form 10-K.  
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the 
definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):

Large accelerated filer  

         Accelerated filer  

Non-accelerated filer  

  (do not check if a smaller reporting company)        Smaller reporting company  

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes 
The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 30, 2013 was $98,932,168,368.
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of January 31, 2014 was 989,881,374.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

  No 

Part III of this Form 10-K incorporates information by reference from the registrant’s 2014 definitive proxy statement which will be filed no later than 120 days after 
December 31, 2013

 
 
McDONALD’S CORPORATION

INDEX

Page reference

Part I.

Part II.

Part III.

Part IV.

Item 1
Item 1A
Item 1B
Item 2
Item 3
Item 4

Item 5
Item 6
Item 7
Item 7A
Item 8
Item 9
Item 9A
Item 9B

Item 10
Item 11
Item 12
Item 13
Item 14

Business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Risk Factors and Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unresolved Staff Comments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Legal Proceedings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mine Safety Disclosures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Selected Financial Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Controls and Procedures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder Matters . . . . . . . . .
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Principal Accountant Fees and Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 15

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Signatures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Exhibits

All trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.

1
3
5
6
6
6

8
9
10
25
25
46
46
46

46
46
46
47
47

47

50

PART I

ITEM 1. Business

McDonald’s Corporation, the registrant, together with its sub-
sidiaries, is referred to herein as the “Company.”

a. General development of business
During 2013, there were no material changes to the Company’s 
corporate structure or in its method of conducting business. In 
2013, the Company continued the process it began in 2005 to 
realign certain subsidiaries to develop a corporate structure within 
its geographic segments that better reflects the operation of the 
McDonald’s worldwide business.

b. Financial information about segments
Segment data for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 
2011 are included in Part II, Item 8, page 39 of this Form 10-K.

c. Narrative description of business

General

The Company franchises and operates McDonald’s restaurants in 
the global restaurant industry. These restaurants serve a broad 
menu (see Products) at various price points in more than 100 
countries around the world.

All restaurants are operated either by the Company or by 

franchisees, including conventional franchisees under franchise 
arrangements, and developmental licensees and foreign affiliated 
markets under license agreements.

The Company’s operations are designed to assure 

consistency and high quality at every restaurant. When granting 
franchises or licenses, the Company is selective and generally is 
not in the practice of franchising to passive investors.

Under the conventional franchise arrangement, franchisees 

provide a portion of the capital required by initially investing in the 
equipment, signs, seating and décor of their restaurant 
businesses, and by reinvesting in the business over time. The 
Company owns the land and building or secures long-term leases 
for both Company-operated and conventional franchised 
restaurant sites. In certain circumstances, the Company 
participates in reinvestment for conventional franchised 
restaurants. A discussion regarding site selection is included in 
Part I, Item 2, page 6 of this Form 10-K.

Conventional franchisees contribute to the Company’s 
revenue stream through the payment of rent and royalties based 
upon a percent of sales, with specified minimum rent payments, 
along with initial fees received upon the opening of a new 
restaurant or the granting of a new franchise term. The 
conventional franchise arrangement typically lasts 20 years, and 
franchising practices are generally consistent throughout the 
world. Over 70% of franchised restaurants operate under 
conventional franchise arrangements.

Under a developmental license arrangement, licensees 
provide capital for the entire business, including the real estate 
interest. While the Company has no capital invested, it receives a 
royalty based on a percent of sales, as well as initial fees. The 
largest of these developmental license arrangements operates 
nearly 2,100 restaurants across 19 countries in Latin America and 
the Caribbean.

The Company has an equity investment in a limited number of 

foreign affiliated markets, referred to as "affiliates." The largest of 
these affiliates is Japan, where there are nearly 3,200 restaurants. 
The Company receives a royalty based on a percent of sales in 
these markets and records its share of net results in Equity in 
earnings of unconsolidated affiliates.

The Company and its franchisees purchase food, packaging, 

equipment and other goods from numerous independent 
suppliers. The Company has established and strictly enforces high 
quality standards and product specifications. The Company has 
quality centers around the world to ensure that its high standards 
are consistently met. The quality assurance process not only 
involves ongoing product reviews, but also on-site supplier visits. A 
quality leadership board, composed of the Company’s technical, 
safety and supply chain specialists, provides strategic global 
leadership for all aspects of food quality and safety. In addition, the 
Company works closely with suppliers to encourage innovation, 
assure best practices and drive continuous improvement. 
Leveraging scale, supply chain infrastructure and risk 
management strategies, the Company also collaborates with 
suppliers toward a goal of achieving competitive, predictable food 
and paper costs over the long term.

Independently owned and operated distribution centers, 

approved by the Company, distribute products and supplies to 
McDonald’s restaurants. In addition, restaurant personnel are 
trained in the proper storage, handling and preparation of 
products.

McDonald’s global brand is well known. Marketing, 

promotional and public relations activities are designed to promote 
McDonald’s brand image and differentiate the Company from 
competitors. Marketing and promotional efforts focus on value, 
food taste, menu choice, nutrition, convenience and the customer 
experience. The Company continuously endeavors to improve its 
social responsibility and environmental practices to achieve long-
term sustainability, which benefits McDonald’s and the 
communities it serves.

Products

McDonald’s restaurants offer a substantially uniform menu, 
although there are geographic variations to suit local consumer 
preferences and tastes. In addition, McDonald’s tests new 
products on an ongoing basis.

McDonald’s menu includes hamburgers and cheeseburgers, 

Big Mac, Quarter Pounder with Cheese, Filet-O-Fish, several 
chicken sandwiches, Chicken McNuggets, wraps, french fries, 
salads, oatmeal, shakes, McFlurry desserts, sundaes, soft serve 
cones, pies, soft drinks, coffee, McCafé beverages and other 
beverages. In addition, the restaurants sell a variety of other 
products during limited-time promotions.

McDonald’s restaurants in the U.S. and many international 

markets offer a full or limited breakfast menu. Breakfast offerings 
may include Egg McMuffin, Sausage McMuffin with Egg, 
McGriddles, biscuit and bagel sandwiches and hotcakes.

Intellectual property

The Company owns or is licensed to use valuable intellectual 
property including trademarks, service marks, patents, copyrights, 
trade secrets and other proprietary information. The Company 
considers the trademarks “McDonald’s” and “The Golden Arches 
Logo” to be of material importance to its business. Depending on 
the jurisdiction, trademarks and service marks generally are valid 
as long as they are used and/or registered. Patents, copyrights 
and licenses are of varying remaining durations.

Seasonal operations

The Company does not consider its operations to be seasonal to 
any material degree.

Working capital practices

Information about the Company’s working capital practices is 
incorporated herein by reference to Management’s discussion and 
analysis of financial condition and results of operations for the 

McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report    1
McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report   |   1

 
 
 
 
 
years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011 in Part II, 
Item 7, pages 10 through 25, and the Consolidated statement of 
cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, and 
2011 in Part II, Item 8, page 29 of this Form 10-K.

Customers

The Company’s business is not dependent upon either a single 
customer or small group of customers.

Backlog

Company-operated restaurants have no backlog orders.

Government contracts

No material portion of the business is subject to renegotiation of 
profits or termination of contracts or subcontracts at the election of 
the U.S. government.

Competition

McDonald’s restaurants compete with international, national, 
regional and local retailers of food products. The Company 
competes on the basis of price, convenience, service, menu 
variety and product quality in a highly fragmented global 
restaurant industry.

In measuring the Company’s competitive position, 

management reviews data compiled by Euromonitor International, 
a leading source of market data with respect to the global 
restaurant industry. The Company’s primary competition, which 
management refers to as the informal eating out ("IEO") segment, 
includes the following restaurant categories defined by 
Euromonitor International: quick-service eating establishments, 
casual dining full-service restaurants, street stalls or kiosks, 
cafés,100% home delivery/takeaway providers, specialist coffee 
shops, self-service cafeterias and juice/smoothie bars. Market 
data related to cafés is separately available and now included in 
the IEO segment. The IEO segment excludes establishments that 
primarily serve alcohol and full-service restaurants other than 
casual dining.

Based on data from Euromonitor International, the global IEO 

segment was composed of approximately 8 million outlets and 
generated $1.2 trillion in annual sales in 2012, the most recent 
year for which data is available. McDonald’s Systemwide 2012 
restaurant business accounted for 0.4% of those outlets and about 
8% of the sales.

Management also on occasion benchmarks McDonald’s 
against the entire restaurant industry, including the IEO segment 
defined above and all other full-service restaurants. Based on data 
from Euromonitor International, the restaurant industry was 
composed of approximately 16 million outlets and generated $2.3 
trillion in annual sales in 2012. McDonald’s Systemwide restaurant 
business accounted for 0.2% of those outlets and about 4% of the 
sales.

  Research and development

The Company operates research and development facilities in the 
U.S., Europe and Asia. While research and development activities 
are important to the Company’s business, these expenditures are 
not material. Independent suppliers also conduct research 
activities that benefit the Company, its franchisees and suppliers 
(collectively referred to as the "System").

Environmental matters

Increased focus by U.S. and overseas governmental authorities 
on environmental matters is likely to lead to new governmental 
initiatives, particularly in the area of climate change. While we 
cannot predict the precise nature of these initiatives, we expect 
that they may impact our business both directly and indirectly. 

2    McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report
2   |   McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report

Although the impact would likely vary by world region and/or 
market, we believe that adoption of new regulations may increase 
costs, including for the Company, its franchisees and suppliers. 
Also, there is a possibility that governmental initiatives, or actual or 
perceived effects of changes in weather patterns or climate, could 
have a direct impact on the operations of our restaurants or the 
operations of our suppliers in ways which we cannot predict at this 
time.

The Company monitors developments related to 

environmental matters and plans to respond to governmental 
initiatives in a timely and appropriate manner. At this time, the 
Company has already begun to undertake its own initiatives 
relating to preservation of the environment, including the 
implementation of more energy efficient equipment and 
management of energy use, in many of its markets.

Number of employees

The Company’s number of employees worldwide, including 
Company-operated restaurant employees, was approximately 
440,000 as of year-end 2013.

d. Financial information about geographic areas
Financial information about geographic areas is incorporated 
herein by reference to Management’s discussion and analysis of 
financial condition and results of operations in Part II, Item 7, 
pages 10 through 25 and Segment and geographic information in 
Part II, Item 8, page 39 of this Form 10-K.

e. Available information
The Company is subject to the informational requirements of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"). The Company 
therefore files periodic reports, proxy statements and other 
information with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission 
("SEC"). Such reports may be obtained by visiting the Public 
Reference Room of the SEC at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 
20549, or by calling the SEC at (800) SEC-0330. In addition, the 
SEC maintains an Internet site (www.sec.gov) that contains 
reports, proxy and information statements and other information.

Financial and other information can also be accessed on the 

investor section of the Company’s website at 
www.aboutmcdonalds.com. The Company makes available, free 
of charge, copies of its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly 
reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and 
amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to 
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act as soon as reasonably 
practicable after filing such material electronically or otherwise 
furnishing it to the SEC. Copies of financial and other information 
are also available free of charge by calling (800) 228-9623 or by 
sending a request to McDonald’s Corporation Shareholder 
Services, Department 720, One McDonald’s Plaza, Oak Brook, 
Illinois 60523.

Also posted on McDonald’s website are the Company’s 

Corporate Governance Principles; the charters for each of the 
Committees of the Board of Directors, including the Audit 
Committee, Compensation Committee and Governance 
Committee; the Code of Conduct for the Board of Directors; and 
the Company’s Standards of Business Conduct, which applies to 
all officers and employees. Copies of these documents are also 
available free of charge by calling (800) 228-9623 or by sending a 
request to McDonald’s Corporation Shareholder Services, 
Department 720, One McDonald’s Plaza, Oak Brook, Illinois 
60523.

Information on the Company’s website is not incorporated into 
this Form 10-K or the Company’s other securities filings and is not 
a part of them. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors and Cautionary
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements

The information in this report includes forward-looking statements 
about our plans and future performance, including those under 
Outlook. These statements use such words as “may,” “will,” 
“expect,” “believe” and “plan.” They reflect our expectations and 
speak only as of the date of this report. We do not undertake to 
update them. Our expectations (or the underlying assumptions) 
may change or not be realized, and you should not rely unduly on 
forward-looking statements.

Our business and execution of our strategic plan, the Plan to 
Win, are subject to risks. The most important of these is whether 
we can remain relevant and a brand customers trust. Meeting 
customer expectations is complicated by the risks inherent in our 
global operating environment.  Challenging economic conditions 
continue to pressure our operating and financial performance.  In 
particular, in some of our major markets, IEO segments may 
remain stagnant or experience modest growth, reflecting broad-
based consumer caution, price sensitivity, and intensifying 
competitive activity by both traditional and non-traditional 
competitors.  Further, certain menu, pricing and promotional 
decisions may continue to yield results below desired levels and 
could continue to negatively impact sales, guest counts and 
market share.  As our business model is built around growing 
comparable sales to realize margin leverage, given these 
conditions and persistent cost pressures, we expect our results for 
2014 will remain challenged. 

We have the added challenge of the cultural and regulatory 

differences that exist within and among the more than 100 
countries where we operate. Initiatives we undertake may not 
have universal appeal among different segments of our customer 
base and can drive unanticipated changes in guest counts and 
customer perceptions. Our operations, plans and results are also 
affected by regulatory, tax and other initiatives around the world, 
notably the focus on nutritional content and the sourcing, 
processing and preparation of food “from field to front counter,” as 
well as industry marketing practices.

These risks can have an impact both in the near- and long-

term and are reflected in the following considerations and factors 
that we believe are most likely to affect our performance.

Our ability to remain a relevant and trusted brand and to 
increase sales and profits depends largely on how well we 
execute the Plan to Win and our global growth priorities.

The Plan to Win aligns the McDonald's System around the 

three global growth priorities that represent our greatest 
opportunities to drive results - optimizing our menu, modernizing 
the customer experience and broadening accessibility to our brand 
in order to remain relevant to our customers. It also keeps us 
focused on a common approach to execution through our 
continued emphasis on people, products, place, price and 
promotion. The quality of our execution depends mainly on the 
following:

Our ability to anticipate and respond effectively to trends or 
other factors that affect the IEO segment and our competitive 
position in the diverse markets we serve, such as spending 
patterns, demographic changes, trends in food preparation, 
consumer preferences and publicity about us, all of which 
can drive perceptions of our business or affect the 
willingness of other companies to enter into site, supply or 
other arrangements with us;

Our continued innovation in all aspects of the McDonald's 
experience to differentiate the McDonald's experience in a 
way that balances value with margin levels;

The impact of changes to our value menu, which has been 
and will continue to be an important component of our overall 
menu strategy; our ability to continue robust menu 
development and manage the complexity of our restaurant 
operations; our ability to adapt our plans to deliver a locally-
relevant experience in a highly competitive, value-driven 
operating environment; our ability to leverage promotional or 
operating successes across markets; and whether sales 
gains associated with new product introductions are 
sustained;

The risks associated with our franchise business model, 
including whether our franchisees have the experience and 
financial resources to be effective operators and remain 
aligned with us on operating, promotional and capital-
intensive initiatives, especially during periods of 
underperformance, and the potential impact on us if they 
experience food safety or other operational problems or 
project a brand image inconsistent with our values, 
particularly if our contractual and other rights and remedies 
are limited, costly to exercise or subject to litigation;

The success of our tiered approach to menu offerings; the 
impact of pricing, product, marketing and promotional plans 
on sales and margins; and our ability to adjust these plans to 
respond quickly to changing economic and competitive 
conditions;

Our ability to drive restaurant improvements that achieve 
optimal capacity, particularly during peak mealtime hours, 
and motivate our restaurant personnel and our franchisees to 
achieve consistency and high service levels so as to improve 
perceptions of our ability to meet expectations for quality 
food served in clean and friendly environments;

Our plans for restaurant reimaging and rebuilding, and 
whether we are able to identify and develop restaurant sites 
consistent with our plans for net growth of Systemwide 
restaurants and achieve our sales and profitability targets;

Our ability to respond effectively to adverse perceptions 
about the quick-service category of the IEO segment or 
about our food (including its nutritional content and 
preparation), promotions and premiums, such as Happy Meal 
toys (collectively, our "products"), how we source the 
commodities we use, and our ability to manage the potential 
impact on McDonald's of food-borne illnesses or product 
safety issues;

The success of our sustainability initiatives to support our 
brand ambition of good food, good people and good 
neighbor, which will require Systemwide coordination and 
alignment, including with our franchisees, and whether we 
will be effective in addressing these and other matters of 
social responsibility in a way that inspires trust and 
confidence;

The costs and risks associated with our increasing reliance 
on technological and digital systems (e.g., point-of-sale and 
other in-store systems or platforms) that support our 
Systemwide restaurants; the risk that we will not fully realize 
the benefits of the significant investments we are making to 
enhance the customer experience; the potential for system 
performance failures, security breaches involving our 
systems or those of third-party providers; legal risks 
associated with data collection, protection and management, 
in particular as it relates to information we collect when we 
provide technology-related services to franchisees; and 
litigation risk involving intellectual property rights;

The impact of campaigns by labor organizations and 
activists, including through the use of social media and other 
mobile communications and applications, to promote adverse 

McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report    3
McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report   |   3

 
 
perceptions of the quick-service category of the IEO segment 
or our brand, management, suppliers or franchisees, or to 
promote or threaten boycotts, strikes or other actions 
involving the industry, McDonald’s or our suppliers and 
franchisees;

The impact of events such as boycotts or protests, labor 
strikes and supply chain interruptions (including due to lack 
of supply or price increases) that can adversely affect us or 
the suppliers, franchisees and others that are also part of the 
McDonald's System and whose performance has a material 
impact on our results;

Our ability to recruit and retain qualified personnel to manage 
our operations and growth; and

Whether we will be able to develop an effective and 
compelling global digital strategy in the future that will 
enhance customer engagement and whether competitor 
loyalty initiatives will impact our ability to attract customers, 
particularly as these initiatives become established and 
customer acquisition costs (i.e., switching costs) increase.

Our results and financial condition are affected by global and 
local market conditions, and the prolonged challenging 
economic environment can be expected to continue to 
pressure our results.

Our results of operations are substantially affected by 
economic conditions, both globally and in local markets, and 
conditions can also vary substantially by market. The current 
global environment has been characterized by persistently weak 
economies, high unemployment rates, inflationary pressures and 
volatility in financial markets. Many major economies, both 
advanced and developing, are still facing ongoing economic 
issues. In the U.S., these include concerns about the long-term 
direction of federal fiscal policies. In many European markets, 
consumer and business confidence and spending remain muted. 
Important markets in Asia have also been experiencing slower 
growth rates. Uncertainty about the long-term environment could 
derail any potential improvements in economic activity for 2014.

These conditions have pressured our performance, adversely 

affecting sales, guest counts and/or our market share in many 
markets, including some major markets.  We are also facing 
increasing competition from an expanded set of competitors that 
include many non-traditional market participants such as 
conventional retailers and coffee shops.  To address this 
environment, we are intensifying our focus on value as a driver of 
guest counts through menu, pricing and promotional actions. 
These actions can adversely affect our margin percent and 
therefore we expect that margins will remain under pressure. The 
key factors that can affect our operations, plans and results in this 
environment are the following:

Whether our strategies will be effective in enabling market 
share gains, which have been achieved at declining rates in 
recent periods, while at the same time enabling us to achieve 
our targeted operating income growth despite the current 
adverse economic conditions, resurgent competitors and an 
increasingly complex and costly advertising environment;

The effectiveness of our supply chain management to assure 
reliable and sufficient product supply on favorable terms;

The impact on consumer disposable income levels and 
spending habits of governmental actions to manage national 
economic matters, whether through austerity or stimulus 
measures and initiatives intended to control wages, 
unemployment, credit availability, inflation, taxation and other 
economic drivers;

4    McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report
4   |   McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report

The impact on restaurant sales and margins of ongoing 
commodity price volatility, and the effectiveness of pricing, 
hedging and other actions taken to address this environment;

The impact on our margins of labor costs that we cannot 
offset through price increases, and the long-term trend 
toward higher wages and social expenses in both mature 
and developing markets, which may intensify with increasing 
public focus on matters of income inequality;

The impact of foreign exchange and interest rates on our 
financial condition and results;

The challenges and uncertainties associated with operating 
in developing markets, which may entail a relatively higher 
risk of political instability, economic volatility, crime, 
corruption and social and ethnic unrest, all of which are 
exacerbated in many cases by a lack of an independent and 
experienced judiciary and uncertainties in how local law is 
applied and enforced, including in areas most relevant to 
commercial transactions and foreign investment;

The nature and timing of decisions about underperforming 
markets or assets, including decisions that result in 
impairment charges that reduce our earnings; and

The impact of changes in our debt levels on our credit 
ratings, interest expense, availability of acceptable 
counterparties, ability to obtain funding on favorable terms or 
our operating or financial flexibility, especially if lenders 
impose new operating or financial covenants.

Increasing legal and regulatory complexity will continue to 
affect our operations and results in material ways.

Our legal and regulatory environment worldwide exposes us 

to complex compliance, litigation and similar risks that could affect 
our operations and results in material ways. In many of our 
markets, including the United States and Europe, we are subject 
to increasing regulation, which has increased our cost of doing 
business. In developing markets, we face the risks associated with 
new and untested laws and judicial systems. Among the more 
important regulatory and litigation risks we face and must manage 
are the following:

The cost, compliance and other risks associated with the 
often conflicting and highly prescriptive regulations we face, 
including where inconsistent standards imposed by 
governmental authorities can adversely affect popular 
perceptions of our business and increase our exposure to 
litigation or governmental investigations or proceedings;

The impact of new, potential or changing regulations that can 
affect our business plans, such as those relating to product 
packaging, marketing and the nutritional content and safety 
of our food and other products, as well as the risks and costs 
of our labeling and other disclosure practices, particularly 
given varying legal requirements and practices for testing 
and disclosure within our industry, ordinary variations in food 
preparation among our own restaurants, and the need to rely 
on the accuracy and completeness of information from third-
party suppliers;

The impact of nutritional, health and other scientific studies 
and conclusions, which constantly evolve and often have 
contradictory implications, but nonetheless drive popular 
opinion, litigation and regulation (including initiatives intended 
to drive consumer behavior) in ways that could be material to 
our business;

The impact of litigation trends, particularly in our major 
markets, including class actions, labor, employment and 
personal injury claims, litigation with or involving our 
relationship with franchisees, landlord/tenant disputes and 
intellectual property claims (including often aggressive or 

opportunistic attempts to enforce patents used in information 
technology systems); the relative level of our defense costs, 
which vary from period to period depending on the number, 
nature and procedural status of pending proceedings; the 
cost and other effects of settlements or judgments, which 
may require us to make disclosures or take other actions that 
may affect perceptions of our brand and products; and the 
scope and terms of insurance or indemnification protections 
that we may have;

Adverse results of pending or future litigation, including 
litigation challenging the composition and preparation of our 
products, or the appropriateness or accuracy of our 
marketing or other communication practices;

The risks and costs to us, our franchisees and our supply 
chain of the effects of climate change, greenhouse gases, 
energy and water resources, as well as the increased public 
focus, including by governmental and non-governmental 
organizations, on these and other environmental 
sustainability matters (e.g., packaging and waste, animal 
health and welfare and land use) and the increased pressure 
to make commitments or set targets and take actions to meet 
them, which could expose the Company to market, 
operational and execution costs or risks, particularly when 
actions are undertaken Systemwide;

The increasing focus on workplace practices and conditions 
and costs and other effects of compliance with U.S. and 
overseas regulations affecting our workforce and labor 
practices, including those relating to wage and hour 
practices, healthcare, immigration, retirement and other 
employee benefits and unlawful workplace discrimination, 
and our exposure to reputational and other harm as a result 
of perceptions about our workplace practices or conditions or 
those of our franchisees;

Disruptions in our operations or price volatility in a market 
that can result from governmental actions, such as price, 
foreign exchange or import-export controls, increased tariffs 
or government-mandated closure of our or our suppliers' 
operations, and the cost and disruption of responding to 
governmental investigations or proceedings, whether or not 
they have merit;

The legal and compliance risks and costs associated with 
privacy, data protection and similar laws, particularly as they 
apply to children, the potential costs (including the loss of 
consumer confidence) arising from alleged security breaches 
of information systems, and the risk of resulting criminal 
penalties or civil liability related to such breaches;

The impact on our operations of tax and other regulations 
affecting capital flows, financial markets or financial 
institutions, which can limit our ability to manage and deploy 
our liquidity or increase our funding costs; and

The impact of changes in financial reporting requirements, 
accounting principles or practices, including with respect to 
our critical accounting estimates, changes in tax accounting 
or tax laws (or related authoritative interpretations), 
particularly if corporate tax reform becomes a key component 
of budgetary initiatives in the United States and elsewhere, 
and the impact of settlements of pending or any future 
adjustments proposed by the IRS or other taxing authorities 
in connection with our tax audits, all of which will depend on 
their timing, nature and scope.

Trading volatility and price of our common stock may be 
affected by many factors.

Many factors affect the volatility and price of our common 
stock in addition to our operating results and prospects. The most 
important of these, some of which are outside our control, are the 
following:

The continuing unpredictable global economic and market 
conditions;

Governmental action or inaction in light of key indicators of 
economic activity or events that can significantly influence 
financial markets, particularly in the United States which is 
the principal trading market for our common stock, and 
media reports and commentary about economic or other 
matters, even when the matter in question does not directly 
relate to our business;

Changes in financial or tax reporting and accounting 
principles or practices that materially affect our reported 
financial condition and results and investor perceptions of our 
performance;

Trading activity in our common stock or trading activity in 
derivative instruments with respect to our common stock or 
debt securities, which can be affected by market commentary 
(including commentary that may be unreliable or incomplete); 
unauthorized disclosures about our performance, plans or 
expectations about our business; our actual performance and 
creditworthiness; investor confidence generally; actions by 
shareholders and others seeking to influence our business 
strategies; portfolio transactions in our stock by significant 
shareholders; or trading activity that results from the ordinary 
course rebalancing of stock indices in which McDonald's may 
be included, such as the S&P 500 Index and the Dow Jones 
Industrial Average;

The impact of our stock repurchase program or dividend rate; 
and

The impact on our results of other corporate actions, such as 
those we may take from time to time as part of our 
continuous review of our corporate structure in light of 
business, legal and tax considerations.

Our results and prospects can be adversely affected by 
events such as severe weather conditions, natural disasters, 
hostilities and social unrest, among others.

Severe weather conditions, natural disasters, hostilities and 
social unrest, terrorist activities, health epidemics or pandemics 
(or expectations about them) can adversely affect consumer 
spending and confidence levels or other factors that affect our 
results and prospects, such as commodity costs. Our receipt of 
proceeds under any insurance we maintain with respect to certain 
of these risks may be delayed or the proceeds may be insufficient 
to offset our losses fully.

ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report    5
McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report   |   5

 
ITEM 2. Properties

The Company owns and leases real estate primarily in connection 
with its restaurant business. The Company identifies and develops 
sites that offer convenience to customers and long-term sales and 
profit potential to the Company. To assess potential, the Company 
analyzes traffic and walking patterns, census data and other 
relevant data. The Company’s experience and access to 
advanced technology aid in evaluating this information. The 
Company generally owns the land and building or secures long-
term leases for restaurant sites, which ensures long-term 
occupancy rights and helps control related costs. Restaurant 
profitability for both the Company and franchisees is important; 
therefore, ongoing efforts are made to control average 
development costs through construction and design efficiencies, 
standardization and by leveraging the Company’s global sourcing 
network. Additional information about the Company’s properties is 
included in Management’s discussion and analysis of financial 
condition and results of operations in Part II, Item 7, pages 
10 through 25 and in Financial statements and supplementary 
data in Part II, Item 8, pages 25 through 42 of this Form 10-K.

ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings

The Company has pending a number of lawsuits that have been 
filed in various jurisdictions. These lawsuits cover a broad variety 
of allegations spanning the Company’s entire business. The 
following is a brief description of the more significant types of 
lawsuits. In addition, the Company is subject to various federal, 
state and local regulations that impact various aspects of its 
business, as discussed below. While the Company does not 
believe that any such claims, lawsuits or regulations will have a 
material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of 
operations, unfavorable rulings could occur. Were an unfavorable 
ruling to occur, there exists the possibility of a material adverse 
impact on net income for the period in which the ruling occurs or 
for future periods.

Franchising

A substantial number of McDonald’s restaurants are franchised to 
independent owner/operators under contractual arrangements 
with the Company. In the course of the franchise relationship, 
occasional disputes arise between the Company and its 
franchisees relating to a broad range of subjects including, but not 
limited to, quality, service and cleanliness issues, contentions 
regarding grants or terminations of franchises, delinquent 
payments of rents and fees, and franchisee claims for additional 
franchises or rewrites of franchises. Additionally, occasional 
disputes arise between the Company and individuals who claim 
they should have been granted a McDonald’s franchise.

Suppliers

The Company and its affiliates and subsidiaries generally do not 
supply food, paper or related items to any McDonald’s restaurants. 
The Company relies upon numerous independent suppliers, 
including service providers, that are required to meet and maintain 
the Company’s high standards and specifications. On occasion, 
disputes arise between the Company and its suppliers which 
include, by way of example, compliance with product 
specifications and the Company’s business relationship with 
suppliers. In addition, disputes occasionally arise on a number of 
issues between the Company and individuals or entities who claim 
that they should be (or should have been) granted the opportunity 
to supply products or services to the Company’s restaurants.

Employees

Hundreds of thousands of people are employed by the Company 
and in restaurants owned and operated by subsidiaries of the 
Company. In addition, thousands of people from time to time seek 
employment in such restaurants. In the ordinary course of 
business, disputes arise regarding hiring, termination, promotion 
and pay practices, including wage and hour disputes, alleged 
discrimination and compliance with employment laws.

Customers

Restaurants owned by subsidiaries of the Company regularly 
serve a broad segment of the public. In so doing, disputes arise as 
to products, service, incidents, advertising, nutritional and other 
disclosures, as well as other matters common to an extensive 
restaurant business such as that of the Company.

Intellectual Property

The Company has registered trademarks and service marks, 
patents and copyrights, some of which are of material importance 
to the Company’s business. From time to time, the Company may 
become involved in litigation to protect its intellectual property and 
defend against the alleged use of third party intellectual property.

Government Regulations

Local, state and federal governments have adopted laws and 
regulations involving various aspects of the restaurant business 
including, but not limited to, advertising, franchising, health, safety, 
environment, zoning, employment and taxes. The Company 
strives to comply with all applicable existing statutory and 
administrative rules and cannot predict the effect on its operations 
from the issuance of additional requirements in the future.

ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

6    McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report
6   |   McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report

 
 
 
 
The following are the Executive Officers of our 
Company (as of the date of this filing):

Jose Armario, 54, is Corporate Executive Vice President—
Global Supply Chain, Development and Franchising, a position he 
has held since October 2011. He previously served as Group 
President, McDonald’s Canada and Latin America from February 
2008 through September 2011 and President, McDonald’s Latin 
America from December 2003 to February 2008. Mr. Armario has 
been with the Company for 17 years.

Peter J. Bensen, 51, is Corporate Executive Vice President 

and Chief Financial Officer, a position he has held since 
January 2008. From April 2007 through December 2007, he 
served as Corporate Senior Vice President—Controller. Prior to 
that time, Mr. Bensen served as Corporate Vice President–
Assistant Controller from February 2002 through March 2007. 
Mr. Bensen has been with the Company for 17 years.

Stephen J. Easterbrook, 46, is Corporate Executive Vice 
President and Global Chief Brand Officer, a position he has held 
since June 2013. From September 2012 through May 2013, Mr. 
Easterbrook served as the Chief Executive Officer of Wagamama 
Limited and from September 2011 to September 2012, he served 
as the the Chief Executive Officer of PizzaExpress Limited. Prior 
to September 2011, Mr. Easterbrook served in a number of roles 
with the Company. From December 2010 to September 2011, he 
held the position of President, McDonald's Europe, and from 
September 2010 to December 2010, he served as Corporate 
Executive Vice President and Global Chief Brand Officer. Mr. 
Easterbrook served as Chief Executive Officer and President, 
McDonald's U.K. from April 2006 to September 2010 and was 
given additional responsibility as President, Northern Division, 
Europe from January 2007 to September 2010. Except for the 
period he was with PizzaExpress and Wagamama, Mr. 
Easterbrook has been with the Company for 20 years.

Timothy J. Fenton, 56, is Chief Operating Officer, a position 

he has held since July 2012. From January 2005 through June 
2012, he held the position of President, McDonald's Asia/Pacific, 
Middle East and Africa and he served as President, East Division 
for McDonald’s USA from May 2003 to January 2005. Mr. Fenton 
has been with the Company for 40 years.

Richard Floersch, 56, is Corporate Executive Vice President 

and Chief Human Resources Officer. Mr. Floersch joined the 
Company in November 2003. He previously served as Senior Vice 
President of Human Resources for Kraft Foods from 1998 through 
2003. Mr. Floersch has been with the Company for 10 years.

Douglas M. Goare, 61, is President, McDonald’s Europe, a 

position he has held since October 2011. From February 2011 
through September 2011, he served as Corporate Executive Vice 
President of Supply Chain and Development. From June 2007 

through November 2010, he held the position of Corporate Senior 
Vice President of Supply Chain. In addition to this role, Mr. Goare 
assumed responsibility for Development in December 2010 and 
served as Corporate Senior Vice President of Supply Chain and 
Development through January 2011. Mr. Goare has been with the 
Company for 35 years.

David L. Hoffmann, 46, is President of Asia/Pacific, Middle 

East and Africa, a position he has held since July 2012. From 
January 2012 through June 2012, he held the position of Senior 
Vice President and Restaurant Support Officer for Asia/Pacific, 
Middle East and Africa. Prior to that time, he held the position of 
Vice President of Strategy, Insights and Development for Asia/
Pacific, Middle East and Africa from May 2011 through December 
2011. From November 2008 through April 2011, he held the 
position of Executive Vice President of McDonald's Japan. Mr. 
Hoffmann has been with the Company for 17 years.

Kenneth M. Koziol, 54, became Corporate Executive Vice 
President—Chief Restaurant Officer in February 2013. From July 
2006 through January 2013, he held the position of Corporate 
Senior Vice President—Innovation. Prior to that time, Mr. Koziol 
served as Corporate Vice President Restaurant Solutions Group 
Worldwide Innovation from June 2004 to July 2006. Mr. Koziol has 
been with the Company for 25 years.

Kevin M. Ozan, 50, is Corporate Senior Vice President–
Controller, a position he has held since February 2008. From 
May 2007 through January 2008, he served as Corporate Vice 
President—Assistant Controller. Mr. Ozan has been with the 
Company for 16 years.

Gloria Santona, 63, is Corporate Executive Vice President, 

General Counsel and Secretary, a position she has held since 
July 2003. Ms. Santona has been with the Company for 36 years.
Jeffrey P. Stratton, 58, is President, McDonald's USA, a 
position he has held since December 2012. He previously served 
as Corporate Executive Vice President–Chief Restaurant Officer 
from January 2005 through November 2012 and prior to that, 
served as U.S. Executive Vice President, Chief Restaurant Officer 
from January 2004 through December 2004. Mr. Stratton has 
been with the Company for 40 years.

Donald Thompson, 50, is President and Chief Executive 
Officer, a position he has held since July 2012. He served as 
President and Chief Operating Officer from January 2010 through 
June 2012. Mr. Thompson was also elected a Director in January 
2011. Prior to that he served as President, McDonald’s USA, from 
August 2006 to January 2010, and as Executive Vice President 
and Chief Operations Officer for McDonald’s USA from January 
2005 to August 2006. Mr. Thompson has been with the Company 
for 23 years.

McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report    7
McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report   |   7

 
PART II

ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of
Equity Securities

MARKET INFORMATION AND DIVIDEND POLICY

The Company’s common stock trades under the symbol MCD and is listed on the New York Stock Exchange in the U.S.  The following table 
sets forth the common stock price ranges on the New York Stock Exchange and dividends declared per common share:

Dollars per share

Quarter:
First
Second
Third
Fourth
Year

High

Low

2013
Dividend

High

Low

Dividend

2012

99.78
103.70
101.81
99.27
103.70

89.25
95.16
94.01
93.14
89.25

0.77
0.77
1.58 *

3.12

102.22
99.50
94.00
94.16
102.22

95.13
85.92
86.15
83.31
83.31

0.70
0.70
1.47 *

2.87

* 

Includes a $0.77 and $0.70 per share dividend declared and paid in third quarter of 2013 and 2012, respectively, and a $0.81 and $0.77 per share dividend 
declared in third quarter and paid in fourth quarter of 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The number of shareholders of record and beneficial owners of the Company’s common stock as of January 31, 2014 was estimated to 

be 1,824,000.

Given the Company’s returns on equity, incremental invested capital and assets, management believes it is prudent to reinvest in the 

business in markets with acceptable returns and/or opportunity for long-term growth and use excess cash flow to return cash to 
shareholders through dividends and share repurchases. The Company has paid dividends on common stock for 38 consecutive years 
through 2013 and has increased the dividend amount at least once every year. As in the past, future dividend amounts will be considered 
after reviewing profitability expectations and financing needs, and will be declared at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors.

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

The following table presents information related to repurchases of common stock the Company made during the quarter ended 
December 31, 2013*:

Period

October 1-31, 2013
November 1-30, 2013
December 1-31, 2013
   Total

Total Number of
Shares Purchased

Average Price
Paid per Share

2,203,213
1,360,592
1,840,646
5,404,451

94.81
97.63
95.85
95.88

Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plans or
Programs(1)
2,203,213
1,360,592
1,840,646
5,404,451

Approximate Dollar
Value of Shares
that May Yet
Be Purchased Under
the Plans or Programs(1)
$ 7,750,841,405
7,618,005,790
7,441,571,916

* 

Subject to applicable law, the Company may repurchase shares directly in the open market, in privately negotiated transactions, or pursuant to derivative 
instruments and plans complying with Rule 10b5-1, among other types of transactions and arrangements.

(1)  On July 19, 2012, the Company's Board of Directors approved a share repurchase program, effective August 1, 2012, that authorizes the purchase of up to 

$10 billion of the Company's outstanding common stock with no specified expiration date.

8    McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report
8   |   McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report

 
 
 
 
ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data

6-Year Summary

Dollars in millions, except per share data
Company-operated sales
Franchised revenues
Total revenues
Operating income
Net income
Cash provided by operations
Cash used for investing activities
Capital expenditures
Cash used for financing activities
Treasury stock purchases(4)
Common stock cash dividends
Financial position at year end:
Total assets
Total debt
Total shareholders’ equity
Shares outstanding in millions
Per common share:
Earnings-diluted
Dividends declared
Market price at year end
Company-operated restaurants
Franchised restaurants
Total Systemwide restaurants
Franchised sales(5)

2013
$18,875
$ 9,231
$28,106
$ 8,764
$ 5,586
$ 7,121
$ 2,674
$ 2,825
$ 4,043
$ 1,810
$ 3,115

$36,626
$14,130
$16,010
990

5.55
$
$
3.12
$ 97.03
6,738
28,691
35,429
$70,251

2012
18,603
8,964
27,567
8,605
5,465
6,966
3,167
3,049
3,850
2,605
2,897

35,386
13,633
15,294
1,003

5.36
2.87
88.21
6,598
27,882
34,480
69,687

2011
18,293
8,713
27,006
8,530
5,503
7,150
2,571
2,730
4,533
3,373
2,610

32,990
12,500
14,390
1,021

5.27
2.53
100.33
6,435
27,075
33,510
67,648

2010
16,233
7,842
24,075
7,473
4,946
6,342
2,056
2,135
3,729
2,648
2,408

31,975
11,505
14,634
1,054

4.58
2.26
76.76
6,399
26,338
32,737
61,147

2008  

2009
16,561
15,459
6,961
7,286
23,522
22,745
6,841 (1)
6,443
4,551 (1,2)   4,313
5,751   
1,655   
1,952   
4,421   
2,854   
2,235   

5,917   
1,625   
2,136   
4,115   
3,981   
1,823   

(3)

30,225   
10,578   
14,034   
1,077   

28,462   
10,218   
13,383   
1,115   

4.11 (1,2) 
2.05
62.44
6,262
26,216
32,478
56,928

3.76 (3)
1.63
62.19
6,502   
25,465   
31,967
54,132   

(1) 

(2) 

(3) 

Includes pretax income due to Impairment and other charges (credits), net of $61.1 million ($91.4 million after tax or $0.08 per share) primarily related to the 
resolution of certain liabilities retained in connection with the 2007 Latin America developmental license transaction.

Includes income of $58.8 million ($0.05 per share) for gain on sale of investment related to the sale of the Company’s minority ownership interest in Redbox 
Automated Retail, LLC.

Includes income of $109.0 million ($0.09 per share) for gain on sale of investment from the sale of the Company’s minority ownership interest in U.K.- based Pret A 
Manger.

(4)  Represents treasury stock purchases as reflected in Shareholders' equity.

(5)  While franchised sales are not recorded as revenues by the Company, management believes they are important in understanding the Company's financial 

performance because these sales are the basis on which the Company calculates and records franchised revenues and are indicative of the financial health of the 
franchisee base. Franchised restaurants represent more than 80% of McDonald's restaurants worldwide.

McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report    9
McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report   |   9

 
  
  
ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

and financial measures, including comparable sales and 
comparable guest count growth, Systemwide sales growth and 
returns.

Overview

DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS
The Company franchises and operates McDonald’s restaurants. 
Of the 35,429 restaurants in 119 countries at year-end 2013, 
28,691 were franchised (including 20,355 franchised to 
conventional franchisees, 4,747 licensed to developmental 
licensees and 3,589 licensed to foreign affiliates ("affiliates")—
primarily Japan) and 6,738 were operated by the Company. Under 
our conventional franchise arrangement, franchisees provide a 
portion of the capital required by initially investing in the 
equipment, signs, seating and décor of their restaurant business, 
and by reinvesting in the business over time. The Company owns 
the land and building or secures long-term leases for both 
Company-operated and conventional franchised restaurant sites. 
This maintains long-term occupancy rights, helps control related 
costs and assists in alignment with franchisees. In certain 
circumstances, the Company participates in reinvestment for 
conventional franchised restaurants. Under our developmental 
license arrangement, licensees provide capital for the entire 
business, including the real estate interest, and the Company has 
no capital invested. In addition, the Company has an equity 
investment in a limited number of affiliates that invest in real estate 
and operate or franchise restaurants within a market.

We view ourselves primarily as a franchisor and believe 
franchising is important to both delivering great, locally-relevant 
customer experiences and driving profitability. However, directly 
operating restaurants is paramount to being a credible franchisor 
and is essential to providing Company personnel with restaurant 
operations experience. In our Company-operated restaurants, and 
in collaboration with franchisees, we further develop and refine 
operating standards, marketing concepts and product and pricing 
strategies, so that only those that we believe are most beneficial 
are introduced in the restaurants. We continually review, and as 
appropriate adjust, our mix of Company-operated and franchised 
(conventional franchised, developmental licensed and foreign 
affiliated) restaurants to help optimize overall performance.

The Company’s revenues consist of sales by Company-
operated restaurants and fees from restaurants operated by 
franchisees. Revenues from conventional franchised restaurants 
include rent and royalties based on a percent of sales along with 
minimum rent payments, and initial fees. Revenues from 
restaurants licensed to affiliates and developmental licensees 
include a royalty based on a percent of sales, and generally 
include initial fees. Fees vary by type of site, amount of Company 
investment, if any, and local business conditions. These fees, 
along with occupancy and operating rights, are stipulated in 
franchise/license agreements that generally have 20-year terms.
The business is managed as distinct geographic segments. 
Significant reportable segments include the United States ("U.S."), 
Europe, and Asia/Pacific, Middle East and Africa ("APMEA"). In 
addition, throughout this report we present “Other Countries & 
Corporate” that includes operations in Canada and Latin America, 
as well as Corporate activities. The U.S., Europe and APMEA 
segments account for 31%, 40% and 23% of total revenues, 
respectively. The United Kingdom ("U.K."), France, Russia and 
Germany, collectively, account for 67% of Europe’s revenues; and 
China, Australia and Japan (a 50%-owned affiliate accounted for 
under the equity method), collectively, account for 54% of 
APMEA’s revenues. These seven markets along with the U.S. and 
Canada are referred to as “major markets” throughout this report 
and comprise 75% of total revenues.

In analyzing business trends, management reviews results on 
a constant currency basis and considers a variety of performance 

10    McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report
10   |   McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report

Constant currency results exclude the effects of foreign 
currency translation and are calculated by translating current 
year results at prior year average exchange rates. 
Management reviews and analyzes business results in 
constant currencies and bases certain incentive 
compensation plans on these results because we believe this 
better represents the Company’s underlying business trends.

Comparable sales and comparable guest counts are key 
performance indicators used within the retail industry and are 
indicative of the impact of the Company’s initiatives as well 
as local economic and consumer trends. Increases or 
decreases in comparable sales and comparable guest 
counts represent the percent change in sales and 
transactions, respectively, from the same period in the prior 
year for all restaurants, whether operated by the Company or 
franchisees, in operation at least thirteen months, including 
those temporarily closed. Some of the reasons restaurants 
may be temporarily closed include reimaging or remodeling, 
rebuilding, road construction and natural disasters. 
Comparable sales exclude the impact of currency translation. 
Comparable sales are driven by changes in guest counts and 
average check, which is affected by changes in pricing and 
product mix. Generally, pricing has a greater impact on 
average check than product mix. The goal is to achieve a 
balanced contribution from both guest counts and average 
check. 

McDonald’s reports on a calendar basis and therefore 
the comparability of the same month, quarter and year with 
the corresponding period of the prior year will be impacted by 
the mix of days. The number of weekdays and weekend days 
in a given timeframe can have a positive or negative impact 
on comparable sales and guest counts. The Company refers 
to these impacts as calendar shift/trading day adjustments. In 
addition, the timing of holidays can impact comparable sales 
and guest counts. These impacts vary geographically due to 
consumer spending patterns and have a more pronounced 
effect on monthly comparable sales and guest counts while 
the annual impacts are typically minimal.

Systemwide sales include sales at all restaurants. While 
franchised sales are not recorded as revenues by the 
Company, management believes the information is important 
in understanding the Company’s financial performance 
because these sales are the basis on which the Company 
calculates and records franchised revenues and are 
indicative of the financial health of the franchisee base.

Return on incremental invested capital ("ROIIC") is a 
measure reviewed by management over one-year and three-
year time periods to evaluate the overall profitability of the 
business units, the effectiveness of capital deployed and the 
future allocation of capital. The return is calculated by 
dividing the change in operating income plus depreciation 
and amortization (numerator) by the cash used for investing 
activities (denominator), primarily capital expenditures. The 
calculation uses a constant average foreign exchange rate 
over the periods included in the calculation.

STRATEGIC DIRECTION AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE
The strength of the alignment among the Company, its franchisees 
and suppliers (collectively referred to as the "System") has been 
key to McDonald's success. By leveraging our System, we are 
able to identify, implement and scale ideas that meet customers' 
changing needs and preferences. In addition, our business model 

enables McDonald's to consistently deliver locally-relevant 
restaurant experiences to customers and be an integral part of the 
communities we serve.

McDonald's customer-focused Plan to Win ("Plan") provides a 
common framework that aligns our global business and allows for 
local adaptation. We continue to focus on our three global growth 
priorities of optimizing our menu, modernizing the customer 
experience, and broadening accessibility to Brand McDonald's 
within the framework of our Plan. Our initiatives support these 
priorities, and are executed with a focus on the Plan's five pillars - 
People, Products, Place, Price and Promotion - to enhance our 
customers' experience and build shareholder value over the long 
term. We believe these priorities align with our customers' evolving 
needs, and - combined with our competitive advantages of 
convenience, menu variety, geographic diversification and System 
alignment - will drive long-term sustainable growth.

To measure our performance as we strive to build the 
business, we have the following long-term, average annual 
constant currency financial targets:

Systemwide sales growth of 3% to 5%;

Operating income growth of 6% to 7%;

ROIIC in the high teens.

In 2013, Systemwide sales growth was 1% (3% in constant 

currencies), operating income growth was 2% (3% in constant 
currencies), one-year ROIIC was 11.4% and three-year ROIIC was 
20.2% (see reconciliation on page 23). Our operating income 
growth and returns fell below our long-term financial targets, 
reflecting the impact of soft comparable sales performance. In our 
heavily franchised business model, growing comparable sales is 
important to increasing operating income and returns.

In 2013, our comparable sales increased 0.2%, reflecting 

higher average check and negative comparable guest counts of 
1.9%. Challenging conditions, including a flat or contracting 
informal eating out (“IEO”) segment in most major markets, 
heightened competitive activity and consumer price sensitivity, 
continued to pressure performance. Furthermore, McDonald’s 
customer-facing initiatives did not generate the comparable sales 
lift or customer visits necessary to overcome these headwinds. 
In 2014, we do not expect significant changes in market 
dynamics given modest growth projections for the IEO segment. 
However, we continue to believe that our targets remain 
achievable over the long term. 

The following is a summary of our 2013 sales performance 
and our initiatives within the three global growth priorities by major 
segment.

U.S.
In the U.S., comparable sales declined 0.2% and comparable 
guest counts declined 1.6%. Guest visits were down as initiatives 
did not resonate as strongly as expected with customers amid a 
sluggish IEO segment and heightened competitive activity. 

The U.S. introduced a number of significant new products 
(such as Premium McWraps, Egg White Delight McMuffins and an 
extended line-up of Quarter Pounder Burgers) and featured new 
limited-time food and beverage options to enhance the relevance 
of its product offerings.

Modernizing the customer experience continued through our 

reimaging program. During 2013, we completed about 700 
restaurant reimages, of which the majority added drive-thru 
capacity. Currently, 45% of our restaurant interiors and exteriors 
reflect our contemporary restaurant design.

We broadened accessibility by opening 225 new restaurants, 
extending hours in more restaurants, and improving the efficiency 
of our drive-thru service with side-by-side or tandem ordering, and 
hand-held order taking. More than half of our restaurants now use 
one of these multiple order points to maximize drive-thru capacity. 
In addition, the U.S. evolved its value proposition with the recent 
introduction of Dollar Menu & More, which is intended to offer 
value and variety to our customers at various price points.

Europe
In Europe, comparable sales were flat, while comparable guest 
counts declined 1.5%, as persistently low consumer confidence 
continued to negatively affect the IEO segment. Comparable sales 
results reflected positive performance in the U.K. and Russia, 
which were mostly offset by weak performance in Germany, where 
we are working on rebuilding brand relevance to address the 
current negative guest count trend.

In 2013, we remained focused on growing the business by 

emphasizing value menu enhancements, premium menu 
additions, limited-time offers and expansion of the breakfast 
daypart. We also successfully launched blended ice beverages in 
the U.K., which positively contributed to results.

In order to continue providing a relevant, contemporary 
customer experience, Europe completed about 470 restaurant 
reimages during the year. By the end of 2013, nearly 100% of 
restaurant interiors and 80% of exteriors were modernized.  

We increased our accessibility and convenience by opening 

312 new restaurants, extending operating hours and optimizing 
our drive-thrus. We enhanced our value offerings in certain 
markets with multiple pricing tiers across our menu to appeal to a 
broad range of customers. For example, in France we launched 
the Casse-Croûte, a two-item meal for 4.50 Euro, which positively 
contributed to recent results in that market.

APMEA
In APMEA, comparable sales declined 1.9% and comparable 
guest counts declined 3.8%. Our three largest markets 
experienced negative comparable sales, with Japan having the 
most significant impact. Though the challenges differ across the 
segment, overall performance was pressured amid slower 
economic growth, a highly competitive environment focused 
primarily on value, and issues such as Avian influenza in a few 
markets. In addition, softer than expected performance of new 
products and promotions did not overcome negative guest count 
trends.

Throughout the segment, we focused on accelerating growth 

across all dayparts, with particular emphasis on dinner and the 
expansion of breakfast. APMEA held a National Breakfast Day, 
during which five thousand restaurants gave away five million Egg 
McMuffins to promote breakfast in the segment. We were also 
committed to enhancing local relevance with consumers, by 
balancing our global core menu with locally-relevant food and 
beverage choices, which included new flavor profiles designed to 
match local tastes. 

We continued to make progress in our reimaging program, 
completing about 240 restaurant reimages during the year. By the 
end of 2013, over 65% of restaurant interiors and over 55% of 
exteriors were modernized.  

We opened 731 new restaurants, including 275 in China. We 

deployed our convenience initiatives to more restaurants, 
including dessert kiosks, delivery service, drive-thrus and 
extended hours. In addition, we continued to evolve our everyday 
value platform by including more affordable menu options and 
promotional offers across dayparts and price points.

McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report    11
McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report   |   11

 
Consolidated Operating Results
Globally, our approach to offering variety and value across the 
menu to our customers is complemented by a focus on driving 
operating efficiencies, and leveraging our scale and supply chain 
infrastructure to manage costs. In 2013, we maintained a full-year 
combined operating margin of 31.2%, as we grew revenues 2% 
and managed our expenses. 

We continued our long-standing commitment to fiscal 

discipline and maintained a strong financial foundation. Cash from 
operations benefits from our heavily franchised business model as 
the rent and royalty income we receive from franchisees provides 
a stable revenue stream that has relatively low costs. In addition, 
the franchise business model is less capital intensive than the 
Company-owned model. We believe locally-owned and operated 
restaurants are important to McDonald's being not just a global 
brand, but also a locally-relevant one.

In 2013, cash from operations was $7.1 billion. Our 

substantial cash flow, strong credit rating and continued access to 
credit provided us flexibility to fund capital expenditures as well as 
return cash to shareholders. Capital expenditures of approximately 
$2.8 billion were invested in our business, of which more than half 
was devoted to new restaurant openings and the remainder was 
reinvested in our existing restaurants. Across the System, 1,438 
restaurants were opened and over 1,500 existing locations were 
reimaged. 

We continued to return all free cash flow (cash from 

operations less capital expenditures) to shareholders, and in 2013 
returned $4.9 billion to shareholders consisting of $3.1 billion in 
dividends and $1.8 billion in share repurchases.

RESULTS FROM THE YEAR:

Global comparable sales increased 0.2% and comparable 
guest counts declined 1.9%. 

Consolidated revenues increased 2% (2% in constant 
currencies).

Consolidated operating income increased 2% (3% in 
constant currencies).

Diluted earnings per share was $5.55, an increase of 4% 
(4% in constant currencies).

Cash provided by operations was $7.1 billion.

One-year ROIIC was 11.4% and three-year ROIIC was 
20.2% for the period ended December 31, 2013.

The Company increased the quarterly cash dividend per 
share 5% to $0.81 for the fourth quarter, equivalent to an 
annual dividend of $3.24 per share.

The Company returned $4.9 billion to shareholders through 
dividends and share repurchases.

OUTLOOK FOR 2014 
We are focused on delivering great-tasting, high-quality, affordable 
food and beverages and an exceptional experience for our 
customers. By leveraging our competitive advantages, we are 
well-positioned to pursue the long-term opportunities that exist in 
the over $1 trillion IEO segment.

We do not expect significant changes in market dynamics in 
2014 given modest growth projections for the IEO segment. We 
will remain focused on matters within our control, with the 
customer as our first priority. We plan to strengthen our 
relationship with the customer through better restaurant execution 
and by further leveraging consumer insights in our efforts to 
optimize current initiatives for greater relevance and broader 
consumer reach. 

12    McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report
12   |   McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report

We remain committed to adapting to keep pace with evolving 

customer needs and investing today to meet future demand. In 
addition, we are prioritizing our near-term efforts on improving 
performance in key opportunity markets that are significant 
contributors to consolidated results. These include Germany, 
Japan and the U.S., which have experienced weak or negative 
performance. 

We will continue to execute against our three global growth 

priorities to optimize our menu, modernize the customer 
experience and broaden accessibility to Brand McDonald’s. 

Our focus will be on our core classics, as well as menu items 

in the beef, chicken, breakfast and beverages categories, where 
we believe there is the most growth opportunity relative to other 
categories in the industry. In addition, we plan to introduce new 
ingredients and greater choice to broaden the appeal of our menu. 
We will enhance the customer experience by continuing to 
reimage our building interiors and exteriors, expand our service 
offerings and develop our digital strategies.  At the same time, we 
remain committed to Quality, Service and Cleanliness, which is 
foundational to everything we do in the restaurants. 

To broaden our accessibility, we plan to expand through 
geographically diversified new restaurant development, extend 
hours in more restaurants, improve the efficiency of our drive-thrus 
and provide more delivery service and dessert kiosks. In addition, 
we will continue to evolve our value platform, offering more 
choices at every price tier.

Furthermore, McDonald’s is committed to growing our 
business sustainably and making a positive difference in society.  
Our key areas of focus include improving customer perceptions of 
our food, sustainable sourcing, providing job opportunities and 
training for our people, developing environmentally efficient 
restaurants and having a positive impact in the communities we 
serve. 

U.S.
In 2014, the U.S. will make adjustments designed to regain 
momentum, including providing greater customer relevance and 
better restaurant execution.  Our 2014 menu strategies better 
balance affordability, core products, new choices and limited-time 
offers. We will also adjust the pace of product introductions to 
improve restaurant operations and marketing execution in order to 
provide a better customer experience. These initiatives are 
complemented by a consistent focus on core equities, such as 
breakfast. We will enhance the breakfast experience by 
emphasizing coffee through high-quality McCafé products paired 
with delicious foods - both existing and new.  Bold new flavor 
extensions will be introduced to build upon our core and lay the 
groundwork for future innovations. We plan to open about 250 
new restaurants and to continue our reimaging program by 
updating approximately 300 existing restaurants in 2014, a slightly 
slower pace as we prioritize other kitchen investments.

Europe
In Europe, we plan to optimize the menu through value menu 
enhancements, premium menu additions and limited-time offers, 
and will continue to expand the breakfast daypart by leveraging 
our strong foundation in coffee. In addition, following the U.K.’s 
successful rollout of McCafé smoothies and frappés, we anticipate 
about 4,500 restaurants in Europe will have the blended-ice 
platform by the end of 2014.

To modernize the way we interact with our customers, we 
plan to leverage the use of technology, such as self-order kiosks 
and mobile and web ordering. We will focus on broadening 
accessibility by continuing to extend operating hours, optimizing 
drive-thrus, and expanding everyday value platforms. We plan to 
open over 300 new restaurants and reimage approximately 400 
existing restaurants in 2014.  

APMEA
In 2014, APMEA’s growth opportunities include menu variety,  
convenience, value evolution and restaurant expansion. We will 
balance core and limited-time offers and execute a series of 
exciting food events. APMEA will shift existing value platforms 
toward more compelling offers that resonate with customers and 
generate incremental visits, including “mid-tier” options to fill the 
gap between entry-level options and Extra Value Meals. Our 
efforts around reimaging will continue as we expect to modernize 
approximately 400 existing restaurants.  Our plan is to open 
around 800 new restaurants, with about 300 expected in China. In 
addition, we will evolve our franchising strategy to include more 
conventional franchisees and developmental licensees, enabling 
an increased pace of development and enhanced profitability.

Consolidated 
In making capital allocation decisions, our goal is to make 
investments that elevate the McDonald's experience and drive 
sustainable long-term growth in sales and market share. We focus 
on markets that generate strong returns or have opportunities for 
long-term growth. We remain committed to returning all of our free 
cash flow (cash from operations less capital expenditures) to 
shareholders over the long-term via dividends and share 
repurchases. 

McDonald's does not provide specific guidance on diluted 
earnings per share. The following information is provided to assist 
in forecasting the Company's future results:

Changes in Systemwide sales are driven by comparable 
sales and net restaurant unit expansion. The Company 
expects net restaurant additions to add approximately 2.5 
percentage points to 2014 Systemwide sales growth (in 
constant currencies), most of which will be due to the 949 net 
restaurants (1,098 net traditional openings less 149 net 
satellite closings) added in 2013. 

The Company does not generally provide specific guidance 
on changes in comparable sales. However, as a perspective, 
assuming no change in cost structure, a 1 percentage point 
change in comparable sales for either the U.S. or Europe 
would change annual diluted earnings per share by about 4 
cents.  

With about 75% of McDonald's grocery bill comprised of 10 
different commodities, a basket of goods approach is the 
most comprehensive way to look at the Company's 
commodity costs. For the full year 2014, the total basket of 
goods cost is expected to increase 1.0-2.0% in the U.S. and 
Europe.

The Company expects full-year 2014 selling, general and 
administrative expenses to increase approximately 8% in 
constant currencies, with fluctuations expected between the 
quarters.  The increase is primarily due to the impact of 
below target 2013 incentive-based compensation, expenses 
associated with our Worldwide Owner/Operator Convention 
and sponsorship of the Winter Olympic games, and costs 
related to other initiatives. 

Based on current interest and foreign currency exchange 
rates, the Company expects interest expense for the full year 
2014 to increase approximately 5-7% compared with 2013.  

A significant part of the Company's operating income is 
generated outside the U.S., and about 40% of its total debt is 
denominated in foreign currencies. Accordingly, earnings are 
affected by changes in foreign currency exchange rates, 
particularly the Euro, British Pound, Australian Dollar and 
Canadian Dollar. Collectively, these currencies represent 
approximately 65% of the Company's operating income 
outside the U.S. If all four of these currencies moved by 10% 
in the same direction, the Company's annual diluted earnings 
per share would change by about 25 cents.

The Company expects the effective income tax rate for the 
full-year 2014 to be 31% to 33%. Some volatility may be 
experienced between the quarters resulting in a quarterly tax 
rate that is outside the annual range. 

The Company expects capital expenditures for 2014 to be 
between $2.9 - $3.0 billion. Over half of this amount will be 
used to open new restaurants. The Company expects to 
open about 1,500 - 1,600 restaurants including about 500 
restaurants in affiliated and developmental licensee markets, 
such as Japan and Latin America, where the Company does 
not fund any capital expenditures. The Company expects net 
additions of between 1,000 - 1,100 restaurants. The 
remaining capital will be used to reinvest in existing 
locations, in part through reimaging. Over 1,000 restaurants 
worldwide are expected to be reimaged, including locations 
in affiliated and developmental licensee markets that require 
no capital investment from the Company.

The Company expects to return approximately $5 billion to 
shareholders through dividends and share repurchases in 
2014.

McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report    13
McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report   |   13

 
Consolidated Operating Results

Operating results

Dollars and shares in millions, except per share data

Revenues
Sales by Company-operated restaurants
Revenues from franchised restaurants

Total revenues

Operating costs and expenses
Company-operated restaurant expenses
Franchised restaurants-occupancy expenses
Selling, general & administrative expenses
Other operating (income) expense, net

Total operating costs and expenses

Operating income
Interest expense
Nonoperating (income) expense, net
Income before provision for income taxes
Provision for income taxes
Net income
Earnings per common share—diluted
Weighted-average common shares outstanding—

diluted

n/m Not meaningful

2013
Increase/
(decrease)

1%
3
2

2
6
(3)
(2)
2
2
1
n/m
2
0
2%
4%

Amount

$18,875
9,231
28,106

15,579
1,624
2,386
(247)
19,342
8,764
522
38
8,204
2,618
$ 5,586
5.55
$

Amount

$18,603
8,964
27,567

15,224
1,527
2,455
(244)
18,962
8,605
517
9
8,079
2,614
$ 5,465
5.36
$

1,006.0

(1%)

1,020.2

2012
Increase/
(decrease)

2%
3
2

3
3
3
(3)
3
1
5
(64)
1
4
(1%)
2%

(2%)

2011

Amount

$18,293
8,713
27,006

14,838
1,481
2,394
(237)
18,476
8,530
493
25
8,012
2,509
$ 5,503
5.27
$

1,044.9

IMPACT OF FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION ON REPORTED RESULTS
While changes in foreign currency exchange rates affect reported results, McDonald’s mitigates exposures, where practical, by purchasing 
goods and services in local currencies, financing in local currencies and hedging certain foreign-denominated cash flows.

In 2013, foreign currency translation had a negative impact on consolidated operating results due to the weaker Australian Dollar, 
Japanese Yen and many other foreign currencies, partly offset by the stronger Euro. In 2012, foreign currency translation had a negative 
impact on consolidated operating results primarily due to the weaker Euro, along with most other currencies. In 2011, foreign currency 
translation had a positive impact on consolidated operating results driven by the stronger Euro and Australian Dollar, as well as most other 
currencies.

Impact of foreign currency translation on reported results

In millions, except per share data
Revenues
Company-operated margins
Franchised margins
Selling, general & administrative expenses
Operating income
Net income
Earnings per common share—diluted

2013
$ 28,106
3,296
7,607
2,386
8,764
5,586
5.55

Reported amount

2012
$ 27,567
3,379
7,437
2,455
8,605
5,465
5.36

2011
$ 27,006
3,455
7,232
2,394
8,530
5,503
5.27

Currency translation
benefit/(cost)
2011
$ 944
134
213
(55)
301
195
0.19

2012
$ (726)
(97)
(204)
40
(261)
(178)
(0.17)

2013
$ (29)
(7)
(43)
(5)
(66)
(52)
(0.05)

14    McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report
14   |   McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report

 
  
 
NET INCOME AND DILUTED EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
In 2013, net income increased 2% (3% in constant currencies) to 
$5.6 billion and diluted earnings per common share increased 4% 
(4% in constant currencies) to $5.55. Foreign currency translation 
had a negative impact of $0.05 on diluted earnings per share. Net 
income and diluted earnings per share growth in constant 
currencies were positively impacted by higher franchised margin 
dollars, and to a lesser extent, lower selling, general and 
administrative expenses. This was partly offset by lower 
Company-operated margin dollars. A decrease in diluted weighted 
average shares outstanding also contributed to the diluted 
earnings per share growth in 2013.

In 2012, net income decreased 1% (increased 3% in constant 
currencies) to $5.5 billion and diluted earnings per common share 

increased 2% (5% in constant currencies) to $5.36. Foreign 
currency translation had a negative impact of $0.17 on diluted 
earnings per share. Net income and diluted earnings per share 
growth in constant currencies were positively impacted by growth 
in franchised margin dollars, partly offset by a higher effective 
income tax rate and higher selling, general and administrative 
expenses. A decrease in diluted weighted average shares 
outstanding also contributed to the diluted earnings per share 
growth in 2012.

The Company repurchased 18.7 million shares of its stock for 

$1.8 billion in 2013 and 28.1 million shares of its stock for $2.6 
billion in 2012, driving reductions in weighted-average shares 
outstanding on a diluted basis in both periods.

REVENUES
The Company’s revenues consist of sales by Company-operated restaurants and fees from restaurants operated by franchisees. Revenues 
from conventional franchised restaurants include rent and royalties based on a percent of sales, minimum rent payments and initial fees. 
Revenues from franchised restaurants that are licensed to foreign affiliates and developmental licensees include a royalty based on a 
percent of sales, and generally include initial fees.

In 2013, constant currency revenue growth was due to expansion. Weak comparable sales reflected a muted response to customer-
facing initiatives amid a highly competitive and sluggish IEO segment across many markets. In 2012, constant currency revenue growth was 
driven primarily by positive comparable sales as well as expansion.

Revenues

Dollars in millions

Company-operated sales:
U.S.
Europe
APMEA
Other Countries & Corporate

Total

Franchised revenues:
U.S.
Europe
APMEA
Other Countries & Corporate

Total

Total revenues:
U.S.
Europe
APMEA
Other Countries & Corporate

Total

Amount

Increase/(decrease)

Increase/(decrease)
excluding currency
translation

2013

2012

2011

2013

2012

2013

2012

$ 4,512
8,138
5,425
800
$18,875

$ 4,339
3,162
1,052
678
$ 9,231

$ 8,851
11,300
6,477
1,478
$28,106

$ 4,530
7,850
5,350
873
$18,603

$ 4,284
2,977
1,041
662
$ 8,964

$ 8,814
10,827
6,391
1,535
$27,567

$ 4,433
7,852
5,061
947
$18,293

$ 4,096
3,034
958
625
$ 8,713

$ 8,529
10,886
6,019
1,572
$27,006

0%
4
1
(8)
1%

1%
6
1
2
3%

0%
4
1
(4)
2%

2%
0
6
(8)
2%

5%
(2)
9
6
3%

3%
(1)
6
(2)
2%

0%
3
2
(6)
1%

1%
4
8
8
3%

0%
3
3
0
2%

2%
6
5
(7)
4%

5%
5
9
11

6%

3%
6
6
0
5%

In the U.S., revenues were relatively flat in 2013 as the 
positive impact of expansion was offset by negative comparable 
sales, reflecting initiatives that did not resonate as strongly as 
expected with customers. Revenues increased in 2012 primarily 
due to positive comparable sales, reflecting everyday value 
offerings, menu variety and the enhanced customer experience 
due to reimaging, despite broad competitive activity.

Europe's constant currency increase in revenues in 2013 
benefited from expansion, primarily in Russia (which is almost 
entirely Company-operated), and positive comparable sales 
performance in the U.K. and Russia, the segment's two largest 
Company-operated restaurant markets, partly offset by negative 
results in Germany. The 2012 increase was primarily driven by 
positive comparable sales in the U.K. and Russia, as well as 
expansion in Russia.

In APMEA, the constant currency increase in revenues in 
2013 was driven by expansion in China and other markets, partly 
offset by negative comparable sales, primarily in China (which is 
mostly Company-operated). The constant currency increase in 
revenues in 2012 was primarily driven by positive comparable 
sales in China, Australia and many other markets, as well as 
expansion, primarily in China.

McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report    15
McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report   |   15

 
 
The following tables present comparable sales, comparable guest counts and Systemwide sales increases/(decreases):

Comparable sales and guest count increases/(decreases)

U.S.
Europe
APMEA
Other Countries & Corporate

Total

2013

Guest
Counts
(1.6%)
(1.5)
(3.8)
0.4
(1.9%)

Sales

(0.2%)
0.0
(1.9)
7.0
0.2%

2012

Guest
Counts
1.9%
(0.5)
2.2
3.0
1.6%

Sales

3.3%
2.4
1.4
7.7
3.1%

2011

Guest
Counts
3.3%
3.4
4.3
4.5
3.7%

Sales

4.8%
5.9
4.7
10.1

5.6%

In 2013, comparable guest count performance declined 1.9%. Germany was the main contributor to the decline in Europe and Japan 

accounted for half of the decline in APMEA. 

Systemwide sales increases/(decreases)

U.S.
Europe
APMEA
Other Countries & Corporate

Total

2013
1%
5
(5)
3
1%

2012
4%
(2)
5
4
3%

Excluding currency
translation
2012
4%
5
6
10

2013
1%
3
3
10

3%

5%

Franchised sales are not recorded as revenues by the Company, but are the basis on which the Company calculates and records 
franchised revenues and are indicative of the financial health of the franchisee base. The following table presents franchised sales and the 
related increases/(decreases):

Franchised sales

Dollars in millions
U.S.
Europe
APMEA
Other Countries & Corporate

Total

RESTAURANT MARGINS

Franchised margins

Franchised margin dollars represent revenues from franchised 
restaurants less the Company’s occupancy costs (rent and 
depreciation) associated with those sites. Franchised margin 
dollars represented about two-thirds of the combined restaurant 
margins in 2013, 2012 and 2011. Franchised margin dollars 
increased $170 million or 2% (3% in constant currencies) in 2013 
primarily due to expansion and increased $205 million or 3% (6% 
in constant currencies) in 2012 primarily driven by positive 
comparable sales.

16    McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report
16   |   McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report

2013
$31,344
17,737
12,759
8,411
$70,251

2012
$31,063
16,857
13,723
8,044
$69,687

Amount

2011
$29,739
17,243
13,041
7,625
$67,648

Increase/(decrease)

Increase excluding
currency translation

2013
1%
5
(7)
5
1%

2012
4%
(2)
5
5
3%

2013
1%
3
4
12

3%

2012
4%
5
6
12

6%

Franchised margins

In millions
U.S.
Europe
APMEA
Other Countries & Corporate

Total

Percent of revenues
U.S.
Europe
APMEA
Other Countries & Corporate

Total

2013
$ 3,626
2,475
923
583
$ 7,607

2012
$ 3,594
2,352
924
567
$ 7,437

2011
$ 3,436
2,400
858
538
$ 7,232

83.6%
78.3
87.7
86.0
82.4%

83.9%
79.0
88.8
85.6
83.0%

83.9%
79.1
89.5
86.1
83.0%

In the U.S., the franchised margin percent decreased in 2013 

due to higher depreciation related to reimaging and weak 
comparable sales. The franchised margin percent was flat in 2012 
as positive comparable sales performance was offset by higher 
depreciation related to reimaging. 

In Europe, the franchised margin percent decreased in 2013 

due to higher rent expense in many markets and weak 

 
  
 
comparable sales primarily due to Germany. The decrease in 2012 
reflected positive comparable sales and higher occupancy costs.

In APMEA, the franchised margin percent decreased in 2013 
partly due to Japan's negative sales performance and the impact 
of the weaker Yen, which reduced its contribution to the segment's 
margin percent. In addition, the segment was negatively impacted 
by a decline in Australia's results. The decrease in 2012 was 
primarily due to Australia.

The franchised margin percent in APMEA and Other 
Countries & Corporate is higher relative to the U.S. and Europe 
due to a larger proportion of developmental licensed and/or 
affiliated restaurants where the Company receives royalty income 
with no corresponding occupancy costs.

Company-operated margins

Company-operated margin dollars represent sales by Company-
operated restaurants less the operating costs of these restaurants. 
Company-operated margin dollars decreased $83 million or 2% 
(2% in constant currencies) in 2013, and decreased $76 million or 
2% (increased 1% in constant currencies) in 2012. 

In 2013, Company-operated margin dollars reflected weak 

comparable sales in many markets, which impacted our ability to 
overcome cost pressures. On a constant currency basis, the 
decrease in Company-operated margin dollars was primarily due 
to APMEA and the U.S., partly offset by positive performance in 
Europe. 

In 2012, Company-operated margin dollars were negatively 
impacted by foreign currency translation of $97 million, primarily in 
Europe. On a constant currency basis, the increase in Company-
operated margin dollars was due to positive performance in 
Europe, offset by lower results in APMEA and the U.S. as positive 
comparable sales were more than offset by higher costs.  

Company-operated margins

In millions
U.S.
Europe
APMEA
Other Countries & Corporate

Total

Percent of sales
U.S.
Europe
APMEA
Other Countries & Corporate

Total

2013
$ 830
1,566
771
129
$ 3,296

2012
$ 883
1,501
849
146
$ 3,379

2011
$ 914
1,514
876
151
$ 3,455

18.4%
19.2
14.2
16.0
17.5%

19.5%
19.1
15.9
16.8
18.2%

20.6%
19.3
17.3
16.0
18.9%

In the U.S., the Company-operated margin percent decreased 

in 2013 primarily due to higher labor, commodity costs and other 
operating costs. The margin percent decreased in 2012 primarily 
due to higher commodity and labor costs, partly offset by positive 
comparable sales.

Europe’s Company-operated margin percent increased in 

2013 due to the positive impact of sales performance in Russia, 
the U.K. and France, mostly offset by higher commodity and 
occupancy costs. The margin percent decreased in 2012 primarily 
due to higher labor and commodity costs across several markets, 
despite positive comparable sales in Russia and the U.K. 

In APMEA, the Company-operated margin percent in 2013 

decreased primarily due to higher labor, occupancy and other 
costs, and negative comparable guest counts, partly offset by a 
higher average check. The margin percent decreased in 2012 
primarily due to higher labor and occupancy costs, partly offset by 
positive comparable sales. New restaurant openings, mainly in 
China, negatively impacted the margin percent in both periods. 
Similar to other markets, new restaurants in China initially open 
with lower margins that grow over time.

SELLING, GENERAL & ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Consolidated selling, general and administrative expenses decreased 3% (3% in constant currencies) in 2013 and increased 3% (4% in 
constant currencies) in 2012. The 2013 decrease was due to lower incentive-based compensation, partly offset by higher employee costs. 
The comparison to costs related to the 2012 London Olympics sponsorship and the 2012 Worldwide Owner/Operator Convention also 
contributed to the decrease in 2013, as well as the increase in 2012. The growth in 2012 was also due to higher employee and technology- 
related costs, partly offset by lower incentive-based compensation.

Selling, general & administrative expenses

Dollars in millions
U.S.
Europe
APMEA
Other Countries & Corporate(1)

Total

2013
$ 740
703
355
588
$ 2,386

2012
$ 782
695
353
625
$ 2,455

Amount

2011
$ 779
699
341
575
$ 2,394

Increase/(decrease)

2013
(5%)
1
1
(6)
(3%)

2012
0%
(1)
4
9
3%

Increase/(decrease)
excluding currency
translation
2012
0%
5
3
9
4%

2013
(5%)
0
1
(6)
(3%)

(1) 

Included in Other Countries & Corporate are home office support costs in areas such as facilities, finance, human resources, information technology, legal, 
marketing, restaurant operations, supply chain and training.

Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percent of revenues were 8.5% in 2013 and 8.9% in 2012 and 2011. Selling, 

general and administrative expenses as a percent of Systemwide sales were 2.7% in 2013 and 2.8% in 2012 and 2011. Management 
believes that analyzing selling, general and administrative expenses as a percent of Systemwide sales, as well as revenues, is meaningful 
because these costs are incurred to support the overall McDonald's business.

McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report    17
McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report   |   17

 
 
OTHER OPERATING (INCOME) EXPENSE, NET

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

Other operating (income) expense, net

In millions
Gains on sales of restaurant

businesses

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated

affiliates

Asset dispositions and other expense

Total

2013

2012

2011

$ (199) $ (152) $ (82)

(78)
30

(178)
23
$ (247) $ (244) $ (237)

(144)
52

Gains on sales of restaurant businesses

The Company’s purchases and sales of businesses with its 
franchisees are aimed at achieving an optimal ownership mix in 
each market. Resulting gains or losses on sales of restaurant 
businesses are recorded in operating income because these 
transactions are a recurring part of our business. Gains on sales 
of restaurant businesses increased in 2013 due primarily to more 
stores sold in Australia. The increase in 2012 was due primarily to 
sales of restaurants in China to developmental licensees, as well 
as sales of restaurants in Europe and Canada.

Unconsolidated affiliates and partnerships are businesses in which 
the Company actively participates, but does not control. The 
Company records equity in earnings from these entities 
representing McDonald’s share of results. For foreign affiliated 
markets—primarily Japan—results are reported after interest 
expense and income taxes. McDonald’s share of results for 
partnerships in certain consolidated markets such as the U.S. is 
reported before income taxes. These partnership restaurants are 
operated under conventional franchise arrangements and, 
therefore, are classified as conventional franchised restaurants. 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates decreased in 2013 
and 2012 due to lower operating results, primarily in Japan.

Asset dispositions and other expense

Asset dispositions and other expense consists of gains or losses 
on excess property and other asset dispositions, provisions for 
restaurant closings and uncollectible receivables, asset write-offs 
due to restaurant reinvestment, and other miscellaneous income 
and expenses. Asset dispositions and other expense decreased in 
2013 due to the favorable resolution of certain liabilities and lower 
asset retirements, partly offset by lower gains on property sales 
and unconsolidated partnership dissolutions. The increase in 2012 
was primarily due to lower gains on unconsolidated partnership 
dissolutions in the U.S.

OPERATING INCOME

Operating income

Dollars in millions
U.S.
Europe
APMEA
Other Countries & Corporate

Total

2013
$3,779
3,371
1,480
134
$8,764

2012
$3,751
3,196
1,566
92
$8,605

Amount

2011
$3,666
3,227
1,526
111
$8,530

Increase/(decrease)

Increase excluding
currency translation

2013

2012

2013

2012

1%
5
(6)
46

2%

2%
(1)
3
(17)

1%

1%
4
0
86

3%

2%
6
3
9
4%

In the U.S., results for 2013 increased due to lower selling, 
general and administrative expenses and higher franchised 
margin dollars, partly offset by lower Company-operated margin 
dollars. Results for 2012 increased due to higher franchised 
margin dollars, partly offset by lower other operating income and 
Company-operated margin dollars.

In Europe, results for 2013 and 2012 were driven by higher 
franchised and Company-operated margin dollars. Results in 2012 
also benefited from higher gains on sales of restaurants, partly 
offset by incremental selling, general and administrative expenses 
related to the 2012 London Olympics.

In APMEA, results for 2013 reflected higher franchised margin 

dollars, mostly offset by lower Company-operated margin dollars. 
Results for 2012 increased primarily due to higher franchised 
margin dollars and gains on sales of restaurants in China to 
developmental licensees, partly offset by lower Company-operated 
margin dollars and lower operating results in Japan.

Combined operating margin

Combined operating margin is defined as operating income as a 
percent of total revenues. Combined operating margin was 31.2% 
in 2013 and 2012, and 31.6% in 2011.

18    McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report
18   |   McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report

 
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest expense increased 1% and 5% in 2013 and 2012, 
respectively, primarily due to higher average debt balances, partly 
offset by lower average interest rates. 

NONOPERATING (INCOME) EXPENSE, NET

Nonoperating (income) expense, net

In millions
Interest income
Foreign currency and hedging activity
Other expense

Total

2013
$ (15)
8
45
$ 38

2012
$ (28)
9
28
$ 9

2011
$ (39)
9
55
$ 25

Interest income consists primarily of interest earned on short-term 
cash investments. Foreign currency and hedging activity includes 
net gains or losses on certain hedges that reduce the exposure to 
variability on certain intercompany foreign currency cash flow 
streams. 

PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES
In 2013, 2012 and 2011, the reported effective income tax rates 
were 31.9%, 32.4% and 31.3%, respectively.

In 2013, the effective income tax rate included a tax benefit of 

nearly $50 million, reflecting the retroactive impact of certain tax 
benefits as a result of the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012.
In 2012, the effective income tax rate reflected the negative 

impact of certain tax benefits in the U.S. that had expired at 
December 31, 2011 and were reinstated retroactively in 2013 as 
noted above.

Consolidated net deferred tax liabilities included tax assets, 

net of valuation allowance, of $1.5 billion in 2013 and 2012. 
Substantially all of the net tax assets are expected to be realized 
in the U.S. and other profitable markets.

Cash Flows

The Company generates significant cash from its operations and 
has substantial credit availability and capacity to fund operating 
and discretionary spending such as capital expenditures, debt 
repayments, dividends and share repurchases.

Cash provided by operations totaled $7.1 billion and 

exceeded capital expenditures by $4.3 billion in 2013, while cash 
provided by operations totaled $7.0 billion and exceeded capital 
expenditures by $3.9 billion in 2012. In 2013, cash provided by 
operations increased $155 million or 2% compared with 2012 
primarily due to increased operating results. In 2012, cash 
provided by operations decreased $184 million or 3% compared 
with 2011 despite increased operating results, primarily due to 
higher income tax payments and the negative impact of foreign 
currency translation on operating results.

Cash used for investing activities totaled $2.7 billion in 2013, 

a decrease of $493 million compared with 2012. The decrease 
primarily reflected lower capital expenditures and a decrease in 
other investing activities related to short-term time deposits. Cash 
used for investing activities totaled $3.2 billion in 2012, an 
increase of $596 million compared with 2011. The increase 
primarily reflected higher capital expenditures, an increase in other 
investing activities related to short-term time deposits, and lower 
proceeds from sales of restaurant businesses.

Cash used for financing activities totaled $4.0 billion in 2013, 
an increase of $193 million compared with 2012, primarily due to 
lower net debt issuances and higher dividend payments, partly 
offset by lower treasury stock purchases. Cash used for financing 
activities totaled $3.8 billion in 2012, a decrease of $683 million 
compared with 2011, primarily due to lower treasury stock 
purchases and higher net debt issuances, partly offset by higher 
dividend payments.

The Company’s cash and equivalents balance was $2.8 
billion and $2.3 billion at year end 2013 and 2012, respectively. 
The Company made a debt repayment of $535 million in January 
2014. In addition to cash and equivalents on hand and cash 
provided by operations, the Company can meet short-term funding 
needs through its continued access to commercial paper 
borrowings and line of credit agreements.

RESTAURANT DEVELOPMENT AND CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
In 2013, the Company opened 1,393 traditional restaurants and 45 
satellite restaurants (small, limited-menu restaurants for which the 
land and building are generally leased), and closed 295 traditional 
restaurants and 194 satellite restaurants. In 2012, the Company 
opened 1,404 traditional restaurants and 35 satellite restaurants 
and closed 269 traditional restaurants and 200 satellite 
restaurants. The majority of restaurant openings and closings 
occurred in the major markets in both years. The Company closes 
restaurants for a variety of reasons, such as existing sales and 
profit performance or loss of real estate tenure.

Systemwide restaurants at year end(1)

U.S.
Europe
APMEA
Other Countries & Corporate

Total

2013
14,278
7,602
9,918
3,631
35,429

2012
14,157
7,368
9,454
3,501
34,480

2011
14,098
7,156
8,865
3,391
33,510

(1) 

Includes satellite units at December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, as follows: 
U.S.—973, 997, 1,084; Europe—261, 246, 240; APMEA (primarily Japan)
—733, 871, 949; Other Countries & Corporate—451, 453, 459.

Approximately 70% of Company-operated restaurants and  
75% of franchised restaurants were located in the major markets 
at the end of 2013. Over 80% of the restaurants at year-end 2013 
were franchised.

McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report    19
McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report   |   19

 
Capital expenditures decreased $224 million or 7% in 2013, 
primarily due to lower reinvestment in existing restaurants, partly 
offset by higher investment in new restaurants.  Capital 
expenditures increased $319 million or 12% in 2012, primarily due 
to higher reinvestment in existing restaurants and higher 
investment in new restaurants. In 2013, the lower reinvestment 
primarily reflected fewer planned reimages. In both years, the 
increase related to new restaurants reflected our commitment to 
broaden accessibility to our brand.

Capital expenditures invested in major markets, excluding 
Japan, represented over 70% of the total in 2013, 2012 and 2011. 
Japan is accounted for under the equity method, and accordingly 
its capital expenditures are not included in consolidated amounts.

Capital expenditures  

In millions
New restaurants
Existing restaurants
Other(1)

Total capital expenditures

Total assets

2013
$ 1,473
1,244
108

$ 2,825
$36,626

2012
$ 1,340
1,615
94

$ 3,049
$35,386

2011
$ 1,193
1,432
105

$ 2,730
$32,990

(1)  Primarily corporate equipment and other office-related expenditures.

New restaurant investments in all years were concentrated in 
markets with strong returns or opportunities for long-term growth. 
Average development costs vary widely by market depending on 
the types of restaurants built and the real estate and construction 
costs within each market. These costs, which include land, 
buildings and equipment, are managed through the use of 
optimally-sized restaurants, construction and design efficiencies, 
and leveraging best practices. Although the Company is not 
responsible for all costs for every restaurant opened, total 
development costs (consisting of land, buildings and equipment) 
for new traditional McDonald’s restaurants in the U.S. averaged 
approximately $3.0 million in 2013.

The Company owned approximately 45% of the land and 
about 70% of the buildings for restaurants in its consolidated 
markets at year-end 2013 and 2012.

SHARE REPURCHASES AND DIVIDENDS
For the last three years, the Company returned a total of $16.4 
billion to shareholders through a combination of share 
repurchases and dividends.

Shares repurchased and dividends  

In millions, except per share data
Number of shares repurchased
Shares outstanding at year end
Dividends declared per share

2013
18.7
990
$ 3.12

2012
28.1
1,003
$ 2.87

2011
41.9
1,021
$ 2.53

Treasury stock purchases (in 
Shareholders' equity)
Dividends paid

Total returned to shareholders

$ 1,810
3,115
$ 4,925

$2,605
2,897
$5,502

$3,373
2,610
$5,983

The Company’s Board of Directors approved a share 

repurchase program, effective August 1, 2012, that authorizes the 
purchase of up to $10 billion of the Company's outstanding 
common stock with no specified expiration date. In 2013, 
approximately 18.7 million shares were repurchased for $1.8 
billion, bringing the total purchases under the program to $2.6 
billion.  

The Company has paid dividends on its common stock for 38 

consecutive years and has increased the dividend amount every 
year. The 2013 full year dividend of $3.12 per share reflects the 
quarterly dividend paid for each of the first three quarters of $0.77 
per share, with an increase to $0.81 per share paid in the fourth 
quarter. This 5% increase in the quarterly dividend equates to a 
$3.24 per share annual dividend and reflects the Company’s 
confidence in the ongoing strength and reliability of its cash flow. 
As in the past, future dividend amounts will be considered after 
reviewing profitability expectations and financing needs, and will 
be declared at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors.

Financial Position and Capital Resources

TOTAL ASSETS AND RETURNS
Total assets increased $1.2 billion or 4% in 2013. Excluding the 
effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates, total assets 
increased $1.5 billion in 2013. Approximately 80% of total assets 
were in major markets at year-end 2013. Net property and 
equipment increased $1.1 billion in 2013, primarily due to capital 
expenditures, partly offset by depreciation, and represented about 
70% of total assets at year end.

Operating income is used to compute return on average 
assets, while net income is used to calculate return on average 
common equity. Month-end balances are used to compute both 
average assets and average common equity.

Returns on assets and equity

Return on average assets
Return on average common

equity

2013
24.8%

2012
25.4%

2011
26.0%

35.8

37.5

37.7

In 2013, return on average assets and return on average 

common equity decreased, reflecting lower growth in operating 
results. In 2012, return on average assets and return on average 
common equity decreased due to the negative impact of foreign 
currency translation primarily on operating income and net 
income. Operating income does not include interest income; 
however, cash balances are included in average assets. The 
inclusion of cash balances in average assets reduced return on 
average assets by about two percentage points for all years 
presented.

20    McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report
20   |   McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report

FINANCING AND MARKET RISK
The Company generally borrows on a long-term basis and is 
exposed to the impact of interest rate changes and foreign 
currency fluctuations. Debt obligations at December 31, 2013 
totaled $14.1 billion, compared with $13.6 billion at December 31, 
2012. The net increase in 2013 was primarily due to net issuances 
of $535 million.

Debt highlights(1)

Fixed-rate debt as a percent of total

debt(2,3)

Weighted-average annual interest

rate of total debt(3)

Foreign currency-denominated debt

as a percent of total debt(2)
Total debt as a percent of total

capitalization (total debt and total
Shareholders' equity)(2)

Cash provided by operations as a

percent of total debt(2)

2013

2012

2011

74% 74% 69%

4.0

41

47

50

4.0

4.2

36

40

47

51

46

57

(1)  All percentages are as of December 31, except for the weighted-average 

annual interest rate, which is for the year.

(2)  Based on debt obligations before the effect of fair value hedging 

adjustments. This effect is excluded as these adjustments have no impact 
on the obligation at maturity. See Debt financing note to the consolidated 
financial statements.

(3) 

Includes the effect of interest rate swaps.

Fitch, Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s currently rate, with a 
stable outlook, the Company’s commercial paper F1, A-1 and P-1, 
respectively; and its long-term debt A, A and A2, respectively.
Certain of the Company’s debt obligations contain cross-

acceleration provisions and restrictions on Company and 
subsidiary mortgages and the long-term debt of certain 
subsidiaries. There are no provisions in the Company’s debt 
obligations that would accelerate repayment of debt as a result of 
a change in credit ratings or a material adverse change in the 
Company’s business. Under existing authorization from the 
Company’s Board of Directors, at December 31, 2013, the 
Company had $3.6 billion of authority remaining to borrow funds, 
including through (i) public or private offering of debt securities; 
(ii) direct borrowing from banks or other financial institutions; and 
(iii) other forms of indebtedness. In addition to debt securities 
available through a medium-term notes program registered with 
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") and a 
Global Medium-Term Notes program, the Company has $1.5 
billion available under a committed line of credit agreement as well 
as authority to issue commercial paper in the U.S. and global 
markets (see Debt Financing note to the consolidated financial 
statements). Debt maturing in 2014 is approximately $530 million 
of long-term corporate debt. In 2014, the Company expects to 
issue commercial paper and long-term debt to refinance this 
maturing debt. As of December 31, 2013, the Company's 
subsidiaries also had $610 million of borrowings outstanding, 
primarily under uncommitted foreign currency line of credit 
agreements.

The Company uses major capital markets, bank financings 

and derivatives to meet its financing requirements and reduce 
interest expense. The Company manages its debt portfolio in 
response to changes in interest rates and foreign currency rates 
by periodically retiring, redeeming and repurchasing debt, 
terminating swaps and using derivatives. The Company does not 
hold or issue derivatives for trading purposes. All swaps are over-
the-counter instruments.

In managing the impact of interest rate changes and foreign 
currency fluctuations, the Company uses interest rate swaps and 
finances in the currencies in which assets are denominated. The 
Company uses foreign currency debt and derivatives to hedge the 
foreign currency risk associated with certain royalties, 
intercompany financings and long-term investments in foreign 
subsidiaries and affiliates. This reduces the impact of fluctuating 
foreign currencies on cash flows and shareholders’ equity. Total 
foreign currency-denominated debt was $5.8 billion and 
$4.9 billion for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, 
respectively. In addition, where practical, the Company’s 
restaurants purchase goods and services in local currencies 
resulting in natural hedges. See the Summary of significant 
accounting policies note to the consolidated financial statements 
related to financial instruments and hedging activities for additional 
information regarding the accounting impact and use of 
derivatives.

The Company does not have significant exposure to any 
individual counterparty and has master agreements that contain 
netting arrangements. Certain of these agreements also require 
each party to post collateral if credit ratings fall below, or 
aggregate exposures exceed, certain contractual limits. At 
December 31, 2013, neither the Company nor its counterparties 
were required to post collateral on any derivative position, other 
than on hedges of certain of the Company’s supplemental benefit 
plan liabilities where our counterparty was required to post 
collateral on its liability position.

The Company’s net asset exposure is diversified among a 

broad basket of currencies. The Company’s largest net asset 
exposures (defined as foreign currency assets less foreign 
currency liabilities) at year end were as follows:

Foreign currency net asset exposures

In millions of U.S. Dollars
Euro
Australian Dollars
British Pounds Sterling
Canadian Dollars
Russian Ruble

2013
$ 7,302
1,933
1,479
1,412
737

2012
$ 6,692
2,450
1,117
1,319
651

The Company prepared sensitivity analyses of its financial 
instruments to determine the impact of hypothetical changes in 
interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates on the 
Company’s results of operations, cash flows and the fair value of 
its financial instruments. The interest rate analysis assumed a one 
percentage point adverse change in interest rates on all financial 
instruments, but did not consider the effects of the reduced level of 
economic activity that could exist in such an environment. The 
foreign currency rate analysis assumed that each foreign currency 
rate would change by 10% in the same direction relative to the 
U.S. Dollar on all financial instruments; however, the analysis did 
not include the potential impact on revenues, local currency prices 
or the effect of fluctuating currencies on the Company’s 
anticipated foreign currency royalties and other payments received 
from the markets. Based on the results of these analyses of the 
Company’s financial instruments, neither a one percentage point 
adverse change in interest rates from 2013 levels nor a 10% 
adverse change in foreign currency rates from 2013 levels would 
materially affect the Company’s results of operations, cash flows 
or the fair value of its financial instruments.

LIQUIDITY
The Company has significant operations outside the U.S. where 
we earn over 60% of our operating income. A significant portion of 
these historical earnings are considered to be indefinitely 
reinvested in foreign jurisdictions where the Company has made, 

McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report    21
McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report   |   21

 
and will continue to make, substantial investments to support the 
ongoing development and growth of our international operations. 
Accordingly, no U.S. federal or state income taxes have been 
provided on these undistributed foreign earnings. The Company's 
cash and equivalents held by our foreign subsidiaries totaled 
approximately $2.0 billion as of December 31, 2013. We do not 
intend, nor do we foresee a need, to repatriate these funds.

In the U.S., the Company maintains certain supplemental 

benefit plans that allow participants to (i) make tax-deferred 
contributions and (ii) receive Company-provided allocations that 
cannot be made under the qualified benefit plans because of 
Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") limitations. At December 31, 
2013, total liabilities for the supplemental plans were $531 million.
In addition, total liabilities for gross unrecognized tax benefits 

Consistent with prior years, we expect existing domestic cash 

were $513 million at December 31, 2013.

and equivalents, domestic cash flows from operations, annual 
repatriation of a portion of the current period's foreign earnings, 
and the issuance of domestic debt to continue to be sufficient to 
fund our domestic operating, investing, and financing activities. 
We also continue to expect existing foreign cash and equivalents 
and foreign cash flows from operations to be sufficient to fund our 
foreign operating, investing, and financing activities.

In the future, should we require more capital to fund activities 

in the U.S. than is generated by our domestic operations and is 
available through the issuance of domestic debt, we could elect to 
repatriate a greater portion of future periods' earnings from foreign 
jurisdictions. This could also result in a higher effective tax rate in 
the future.

While the likelihood is remote, to the extent foreign cash is 
available, the Company could also elect to repatriate earnings 
from foreign jurisdictions that have previously been considered to 
be indefinitely reinvested. Upon distribution of those earnings in 
the form of dividends or otherwise, the Company may be subject 
to additional U.S. income taxes (net of an adjustment for foreign 
tax credits), which could result in a use of cash. This could also 
result in a higher effective tax rate in the period in which such a 
determination is made to repatriate prior period foreign earnings.  
Refer to the Income Taxes note to the consolidated financial 
statements for further information related to our income taxes and 
the undistributed earnings of the Company's foreign subsidiaries.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS AND COMMITMENTS
The Company has long-term contractual obligations primarily in 
the form of lease obligations (related to both Company-operated 
and franchised restaurants) and debt obligations. In addition, the 
Company has long-term revenue and cash flow streams that 
relate to its franchise arrangements. Cash provided by operations 
(including cash provided by these franchise arrangements) along 
with the Company’s borrowing capacity and other sources of cash 
will be used to satisfy the obligations. The following table 
summarizes the Company’s contractual obligations and their 
aggregate maturities as well as future minimum rent payments 
due to the Company under existing franchise arrangements as of 
December 31, 2013. See discussions of cash flows and financial 
position and capital resources as well as the Notes to the 
consolidated financial statements for further details. 

Contractual cash outflows

Contractual cash inflows

In millions

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Thereafter

Total

Operating
leases
$ 1,440
1,334
1,218
1,099
990
7,632
$13,713

Debt
obligations(1)

$ 1,199
2,095
1,054
1,004
8,765
$14,117

Minimum rent under
franchise arrangements
$ 2,703
2,612
2,507
2,377
2,260
18,042
$30,501

(1)  The maturities reflect reclassifications of short-term obligations to long-

term obligations of $1.2 billion, as they are supported by a long-term line 
of credit agreement expiring in November 2016. Debt obligations do not 
include $13 million of noncash fair value hedging adjustments or $222 
million of accrued interest.

22    McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report
22   |   McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report

There are certain purchase commitments that are not 

recognized in the consolidated financial statements and are 
primarily related to construction, inventory, energy, marketing and 
other service related arrangements that occur in the normal 
course of business. The amounts related to these commitments 
are not significant to the Company’s financial position. Such 
commitments are generally shorter term in nature and will be 
funded from operating cash flows.

Other Matters

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and 
results of operations is based upon the Company’s consolidated 
financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance 
with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. The 
preparation of these financial statements requires the Company to 
make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of 
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses as well as related 
disclosures. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its 
estimates and judgments based on historical experience and 
various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the 
circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates 
under various assumptions or conditions.

The Company reviews its financial reporting and disclosure 

practices and accounting policies quarterly to ensure that they 
provide accurate and transparent information relative to the 
current economic and business environment. The Company 
believes that of its significant accounting policies, the following 
involve a higher degree of judgment and/or complexity:

Property and equipment

Property and equipment are depreciated or amortized on a 
straight-line basis over their useful lives based on management’s 
estimates of the period over which the assets will generate 
revenue (not to exceed lease term plus options for leased 
property). The useful lives are estimated based on historical 
experience with similar assets, taking into account anticipated 
technological or other changes. The Company periodically reviews 
these lives relative to physical factors, economic factors and 
industry trends. If there are changes in the planned use of 
property and equipment, or if technological changes occur more 
rapidly than anticipated, the useful lives assigned to these assets 
may need to be shortened, resulting in the accelerated recognition 
of depreciation and amortization expense or write-offs in future 
periods.

Share-based compensation

The Company has a share-based compensation plan which 
authorizes the granting of various equity-based incentives 
including stock options and restricted stock units ("RSUs") to 
employees and nonemployee directors. The expense for these 
equity-based incentives is based on their fair value at date of grant 
and generally amortized over their vesting period.

The fair value of each stock option granted is estimated on 
the date of grant using a closed-form pricing model. The pricing 
model requires assumptions, which impact the assumed fair value, 
including the expected life of the stock option, the risk-free interest 
rate, expected volatility of the Company’s stock over the expected 

 
life and the expected dividend yield. The Company uses historical 
data to determine these assumptions and if these assumptions 
change significantly for future grants, share-based compensation 
expense will fluctuate in future years. The fair value of each RSU 
granted is equal to the market price of the Company’s stock at 
date of grant less the present value of expected dividends over the 
vesting period.

Long-lived assets impairment review

Long-lived assets (including goodwill) are reviewed for impairment 
annually in the fourth quarter and whenever events or changes in 
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may 
not be recoverable. In assessing the recoverability of the 
Company’s long-lived assets, the Company considers changes in 
economic conditions and makes assumptions regarding estimated 
future cash flows and other factors. Estimates of future cash flows 
are highly subjective judgments based on the Company’s 
experience and knowledge of its operations. These estimates can 
be significantly impacted by many factors including changes in 
global and local business and economic conditions, operating 
costs, inflation, competition, and consumer and demographic 
trends. A key assumption impacting estimated future cash flows is 
the estimated change in comparable sales. If the Company’s 
estimates or underlying assumptions change in the future, the 
Company may be required to record impairment charges. Based 
on the annual goodwill impairment test, conducted in the fourth 
quarter, the Company does not have any reporting units (defined 
as each individual country) with goodwill currently at risk of 
impairment.

Litigation accruals

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is subject to 
proceedings, lawsuits and other claims primarily related to 
competitors, customers, employees, franchisees, government 
agencies, intellectual property, shareholders and suppliers. The 
Company is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse 
judgments or outcomes to these matters as well as potential 
ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of 
accrual required, if any, for these contingencies is made after
careful analysis of each matter. The required accrual may change 
in the future due to new developments in each matter or changes 
in approach such as a change in settlement strategy in dealing 
with these matters. The Company does not believe that any such 
matter currently being reviewed will have a material adverse effect 
on its financial condition or results of operations.

Income taxes

The Company records a valuation allowance to reduce its deferred 
tax assets if it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the 
deferred assets will not be realized. While the Company has 
considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and 
feasible tax strategies, including the sale of appreciated assets, in 
assessing the need for the valuation allowance, if these estimates 
and assumptions change in the future, the Company may be 
required to adjust its valuation allowance. This could result in a 
charge to, or an increase in, income in the period such 
determination is made.

The Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and 

is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. The Company records 
accruals for the estimated outcomes of these audits, and the 
accruals may change in the future due to new developments in 
each matter. In 2012, the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") 
completed its examination of the Company's U.S. federal income 
tax returns for 2007 and 2008. The Company and the IRS reached 
an agreement on adjustments that had been previously proposed 
by the IRS. The agreement did not have a material impact on the 
Company's cash flows, results of operations or financial position. 

The Company's 2009 and 2010 U.S. federal income tax 
returns are currently under examination and the completion of the 
field examination is expected in 2014. In connection with this 
examination, the Company received notices of proposed 
adjustments ("NOPAs") in 2014 and expects to receive additional 
NOPAs within the next 12 months from the IRS related to certain 
transfer pricing matters. It is reasonably possible that the receipt of 
these future NOPAs will provide new information that causes the 
Company to reassess the total amount of unrecognized tax 
benefits recorded. While the Company cannot estimate the impact 
that new information may have on our unrecognized tax benefit 
balance, we believe that the liabilities recorded are appropriate 
and adequate as determined under Topic 740 - Income Taxes of 
the Accounting Standards Codification.

Deferred U.S. income taxes have not been recorded for 
temporary differences totaling $16.1 billion related to investments 
in certain foreign subsidiaries and corporate affiliates. The 
temporary differences consist primarily of undistributed earnings 
that are considered permanently invested in operations outside 
the U.S. If management's intentions change in the future, deferred 
taxes may need to be provided.

EFFECTS OF CHANGING PRICES—INFLATION
The Company has demonstrated an ability to manage inflationary 
cost increases effectively. This ability is because of rapid inventory 
turnover, the ability to adjust menu prices, cost controls and 
substantial property holdings, many of which are at fixed costs and 
partly financed by debt made less expensive by inflation.

RECONCILIATION OF RETURNS ON INCREMENTAL INVESTED 
CAPITAL
ROIIC is a measure reviewed by management over one-year and 
three-year time periods to evaluate the overall profitability of our 
markets, the effectiveness of capital deployed and the future 
allocation of capital. This measure is calculated using operating 
income and constant foreign exchange rates to exclude the impact 
of foreign currency translation. The numerator is the Company’s 
incremental operating income plus depreciation and amortization 
from the base period.

The denominator is the weighted-average cash used for 
investing activities during the applicable one-or three-year period. 
The weighted-average cash used for investing activities is based 
on a weighting applied on a quarterly basis. These weightings are 
used to reflect the estimated contribution of each quarter’s 
investing activities to incremental operating income. For example, 
fourth quarter 2013 investing activities are weighted less because 
the assets purchased have only recently been deployed and 
would have generated little incremental operating income (12.5% 
of fourth quarter 2013 investing activities are included in the one-
year and three-year calculations). In contrast, fourth quarter 2012 
is heavily weighted because the assets purchased were deployed 
more than 12 months ago, and therefore have a full-year impact 
on 2013 operating income, with little or no impact to the base 
period (87.5% and 100.0% of fourth quarter 2012 investing 
activities are included in the one-year and three-year calculations, 
respectively). Management believes that weighting cash used for 
investing activities provides a more accurate reflection of the 
relationship between its investments and returns than a simple 
average.

The reconciliations to the most comparable measurements, in 

accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the 
U.S., for the numerator and denominator of the one-year and 
three-year ROIIC are as follows:

McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report    23
McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report   |   23

 
One-year ROIIC calculation (dollars in millions):

Three-year ROIIC calculation (dollars in millions):

Years ended December 31,

2013

2012

Incremental
change

Years ended December 31,

2013

2010

NUMERATOR:

NUMERATOR:

Operating income
Depreciation and amortization
Currency translation(1)
Incremental operating income plus depreciation and
amortization (at constant foreign exchange rates)

$8,764.3
1,585.1

$8,604.6
1,488.5

DENOMINATOR:

Weighted-average cash used for

investing activities(2)
Currency translation(1)

Weighted-average cash used for investing activities

(at constant foreign exchange rates)

$ 159.7
96.6

81.8

$ 338.1

$2,951.7

1.2

$2,952.9

Operating income
Depreciation and amortization
Currency translation(3)
Incremental operating income plus depreciation and
amortization (at constant foreign exchange rates)

$8,764.3
1,585.1

$7,473.1
1,276.2

DENOMINATOR:

Weighted-average cash used for

investing activities(4)
Currency translation(3)
Weighted-average cash used for investing activities

(at constant foreign exchange rates)

One-year ROIIC

11.4%

Three-year ROIIC

Incremental
change

$1,291.2
308.9

25.1

$1,625.2

$8,089.6

(27.5)

$8,062.1

20.2%

(1)  Represents the effect of foreign currency translation by translating results 

(3)  Represents the effect of foreign currency translation by translating results 

at an average exchange rate for the periods measured.

at an average exchange rate for the periods measured.

(2)  Represents one-year weighted-average cash used for investing activities, 

(4)  Represents three-year weighted-average cash used for investing 

determined by applying the weightings below to the cash used for 
investing activities for each quarter in the two-year period ended 
December 31, 2013.

activities, determined by applying the weightings below to the cash used 
for investing activities for each quarter in the four-year period ended 
December 31, 2013.

Years ended December 31,

2013

2012

2011

2010

$2,673.8

$3,167.3

$2,570.9

$2,056.0

87.5% 100.0% 100.0%
62.5

100.0
100.0
100.0

100.0
100.0
100.0

37.5

12.5

12.5%
37.5
62.5
87.5

Cash used for investing activities
AS A PERCENT
Quarters ended:
March 31
June 30
September 30
December 31

Years ended December 31,

2013

$2,673.8

2012
$3,167.3

87.5%

62.5

37.5

12.5

12.5%
37.5
62.5
87.5

Cash used for

investing activities

AS A PERCENT
Quarters ended:
March 31
June 30
September 30
December 31

24    McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report
24   |   McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK FACTORS AND CAUTIONARY STATEMENT ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This report includes forward-looking statements about our plans and future performance, including those under Outlook for 2014. These 
statements use such words as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “believe” and “plan.” They reflect our expectations and speak only as of the date of this 
report. We do not undertake to update them. Our expectations (or the underlying assumptions) may change or not be realized, and you 
should not rely unduly on forward-looking statements. We have identified the principal risks and uncertainties that affect our performance 
elsewhere in this report, and investors are urged to consider these risks and uncertainties when evaluating our historical and expected 
performance.

ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk are included in Part II, Item 7, page 21 of the Form 10-K.

ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Index to consolidated financial statements

Page reference

Consolidated statement of income for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013
Consolidated statement of comprehensive income for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013
Consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2013 and 2012
Consolidated statement of cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013
Consolidated statement of shareholders’ equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013
Notes to consolidated financial statements
Quarterly results (unaudited)
Management’s assessment of internal control over financial reporting
Report of independent registered public accounting firm
Report of independent registered public accounting firm on internal control over financial reporting

26
27
28
29
30
31
42
43
44
45

McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report    25
McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report   |   25

 
Years ended December 31, 2013

2012

2011

$ 18,874.2
9,231.5
28,105.7

$ 18,602.5
8,964.5
27,567.0

$ 18,292.8
8,713.2
27,006.0

6,361.3
4,824.1
4,393.2
1,624.4
2,385.6
(247.2)
19,341.4
8,764.3
521.9
37.9
8,204.5
2,618.6
$ 5,585.9
5.59
$
5.55
$
3.12
$
998.4
1,006.0

6,318.2
4,710.3
4,195.2
1,527.0
2,455.2
(243.5)
18,962.4
8,604.6
516.6
9.0
8,079.0
2,614.2
$ 5,464.8
5.41
$
5.36
$
2.87
$
1,010.1
1,020.2

6,167.2
4,606.3
4,064.4
1,481.5
2,393.7
(236.8)
18,476.3
8,529.7
492.8
24.7
8,012.2
2,509.1
$ 5,503.1
5.33
$
5.27
$
2.53
$
1,032.1
1,044.9

Consolidated Statement of Income 

In millions, except per share data
REVENUES
Sales by Company-operated restaurants
Revenues from franchised restaurants

Total revenues

OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES
Company-operated restaurant expenses

Food & paper
Payroll & employee benefits
Occupancy & other operating expenses

Franchised restaurants-occupancy expenses
Selling, general & administrative expenses
Other operating (income) expense, net

Total operating costs and expenses

Operating income
Interest expense-net of capitalized interest of $15.5, $15.9 and $14.0
Nonoperating (income) expense, net
Income before provision for income taxes
Provision for income taxes
Net income
Earnings per common share–basic
Earnings per common share–diluted
Dividends declared per common share
Weighted-average shares outstanding–basic
Weighted-average shares outstanding–diluted

See Notes to consolidated financial statements.

26    McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report
26   |   McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income

In millions

Net income

Years ended December 31, 2013

2012

2011

$5,585.9 $5,464.8 $5,503.1

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

Foreign currency translation adjustments:

Gain (loss) recognized in accumulated other comprehensive

income (AOCI), including net investment hedges

Reclassification of (gain) loss to net income

Foreign currency translation adjustments-net of tax
benefit (expense) of $(5.3), $(47.9) and $61.0

Cash flow hedges:

Gain (loss) recognized in AOCI
Reclassification of (gain) loss to net income

Cash flow hedges-net of tax benefit (expense) of $11.4,

$(8.8) and $5.8

Defined benefit pension plans:

Gain (loss) recognized in AOCI
Reclassification of (gain) loss to net income

Defined benefit pension plans-net of tax benefit (expense)

of $14.2, $(16.6) and $2.9

Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

Comprehensive income

See Notes to consolidated financial statements.

(279.4)
—

274.7

(310.5)

(0.1)

25.4

(279.4)

274.6

(285.1)

(73.4)
35.9

(37.5)

(52.8)
0.9

(51.9)

19.8
10.8

30.6

33.1
8.4

41.5

(12.2)
1.8

(10.4)

(8.1)
0.4

(7.7)

(368.8)

346.7

(303.2)

$5,217.1 $5,811.5 $5,199.9

McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report    27
McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report   |   27

 
December 31, 2013

2012

$ 2,798.7
1,319.8
123.7
807.9
5,050.1

1,209.1
2,872.7
1,747.1
5,828.9

$ 2,336.1
1,375.3
121.7
1,089.0
4,922.1

1,380.5
2,804.0
1,602.7
5,787.2

40,355.6
(14,608.3)
25,747.3
$ 36,626.3

38,491.1
(13,813.9)
24,677.2
$ 35,386.5

$ 1,086.0
215.5
383.1
221.6
1,263.8
3,170.0
14,129.8
1,669.1
1,647.7

16.6
5,994.1
41,751.2
427.6
(32,179.8)
16,009.7
$ 36,626.3

$ 1,141.9
298.7
370.7
217.0
1,374.8
3,403.1
13,632.5
1,526.2
1,531.1

16.6
5,778.9
39,278.0
796.4
(30,576.3)
15,293.6
$ 35,386.5

Consolidated Balance Sheet

In millions, except per share data
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and equivalents
Accounts and notes receivable
Inventories, at cost, not in excess of market
Prepaid expenses and other current assets

Total current assets

Other assets
Investments in and advances to affiliates
Goodwill
Miscellaneous

Total other assets

Property and equipment
Property and equipment, at cost
Accumulated depreciation and amortization

Net property and equipment

Total assets
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable
Income taxes
Other taxes
Accrued interest
Accrued payroll and other liabilities

Total current liabilities

Long-term debt
Other long-term liabilities
Deferred income taxes
Shareholders’ equity
Preferred stock, no par value; authorized – 165.0 million shares; issued – none
Common stock, $.01 par value; authorized – 3.5 billion shares; issued – 1,660.6 million shares
Additional paid-in capital
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive income
Common stock in treasury, at cost; 670.2 and 657.9 million shares

Total shareholders’ equity

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

See Notes to consolidated financial statements.

28    McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report
28   |   McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

In millions
Operating activities
Net income
Adjustments to reconcile to cash provided by operations

Charges and credits:

Depreciation and amortization
Deferred income taxes
Share-based compensation
Other

Changes in working capital items:

Accounts receivable
Inventories, prepaid expenses and other current assets
Accounts payable
Income taxes
Other accrued liabilities

Cash provided by operations

Investing activities
Capital expenditures
Purchases of restaurant businesses
Sales of restaurant businesses and property
Other

Cash used for investing activities

Financing activities
Net short-term borrowings
Long-term financing issuances
Long-term financing repayments
Treasury stock purchases
Common stock dividends
Proceeds from stock option exercises
Excess tax benefit on share-based compensation
Other

Cash used for financing activities
Effect of exchange rates on cash and equivalents

Cash and equivalents increase (decrease)
Cash and equivalents at beginning of year
Cash and equivalents at end of year
Supplemental cash flow disclosures
Interest paid
Income taxes paid

See Notes to consolidated financial statements.

Years ended December 31, 2013

2012

2011

$ 5,585.9

$ 5,464.8

$ 5,503.1

1,585.1
25.2
89.1
26.8

56.2
(44.4)
(60.7)
(154.4)
11.9
7,120.7

(2,824.7)
(181.0)
440.1
(108.2)
(2,673.8)

(186.5)
1,417.2
(695.4)
(1,777.8)
(3,114.6)
233.3
92.6
(11.8)
(4,043.0)
58.7
462.6
2,336.1
$ 2,798.7

1,488.5
134.5
93.4
(92.0)

(29.4)
(27.2)
124.1
(74.0)
(116.6)
6,966.1

1,415.0
188.4
86.2
(82.6)

(160.8)
(52.2)
35.8
198.5
18.7
7,150.1

(3,049.2)
(158.5)
394.7
(354.3)
(3,167.3)

(2,729.8)
(186.4)
511.4
(166.1)
(2,570.9)

(117.5)
2,284.9
(962.8)
(2,615.1)
(2,896.6)
328.6
142.3
(13.6)
(3,849.8)
51.4
0.4
2,335.7
$ 2,336.1

260.6
1,367.3
(624.0)
(3,363.1)
(2,609.7)
334.0
112.5
(10.6)
(4,533.0)
(97.5)
(51.3)
2,387.0
$ 2,335.7

$ 532.7
2,546.0

$ 533.7
2,447.8

$ 489.3
2,056.7

McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report    29
McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report   |   29

 
 
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity

In millions, except per share data
Balance at December 31, 2010
Net income
Other comprehensive income (loss),

net of tax
Comprehensive income
Common stock cash dividends

($2.53 per share)

Treasury stock purchases
Share-based compensation
Stock option exercises and other

(including tax benefits of $116.7)

Balance at December 31, 2011
Net income
Other comprehensive income (loss),

net of tax
Comprehensive income
Common stock cash dividends

($2.87 per share)

Treasury stock purchases
Share-based compensation
Stock option exercises and other

(including tax benefits of $150.8)

Balance at December 31, 2012
Net income
Other comprehensive income (loss),

net of tax
Comprehensive income
Common stock cash dividends

($3.12 per share)

Treasury stock purchases
Share-based compensation
Stock option exercises and other

(including tax benefits of $93.6)

Balance at December 31, 2013

Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss)

Common stock
issued

Shares Amount
$16.6
1,660.6

Additional
paid-in
capital

$ 5,196.4

Retained
earnings Pensions

Cash flow
hedges

Foreign
currency
translation

$33,811.7
5,503.1

$ (124.6)

$15.0

$862.5

Common stock in
treasury

Shares
Amount
(607.0) $ (25,143.4)

Total
shareholders’
equity

$14,634.2
5,503.1

86.2

204.7

1,660.6

16.6

5,487.3

93.4

198.2

1,660.6

16.6

5,778.9

(7.7)

(10.4)

(285.1)

(41.9)

(3,372.9)

9.7

245.4

(132.3)

4.6

577.4

(639.2)

(28,270.9)

41.5

30.6

274.6

(28.1)

(2,605.4)

9.4

300.0

(90.8)

35.2

852.0

(657.9)

(30,576.3)

(51.9)

(37.5)

(279.4)

(18.7)

(1,810.5)

(2,609.7)

2.4

36,707.5
5,464.8

(2,896.6)

2.3

39,278.0
5,585.9

(3,114.6)

(303.2)

5,199.9

(2,609.7)

(3,372.9)
86.2

452.5

14,390.2
5,464.8

346.7

5,811.5

(2,896.6)

(2,605.4)
93.4

500.5

15,293.6
5,585.9

(368.8)

5,217.1

(3,114.6)

(1,810.5)
89.1

89.1

126.1

1.9

1,660.6

$16.6

$ 5,994.1

$41,751.2

$ (142.7)

$ (2.3)

$572.6

(670.2) $ (32,179.8)

$16,009.7

6.4

207.0

335.0

See Notes to consolidated financial statements.

30    McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report
30   |   McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

NATURE OF BUSINESS
The Company franchises and operates McDonald’s restaurants in 
the global restaurant industry. All restaurants are operated either 
by the Company or by franchisees, including conventional 
franchisees under franchise arrangements, and foreign affiliates 
and developmental licensees under license agreements.

The following table presents restaurant information by 

ownership type:

Restaurants at December 31,
Conventional franchised
Developmental licensed
Foreign affiliated
Franchised
Company-operated
Systemwide restaurants

2013
20,355
4,747
3,589
28,691
6,738
35,429

2012
19,869
4,350
3,663
27,882
6,598
34,480

2011
19,527
3,929
3,619
27,075
6,435
33,510

The results of operations of restaurant businesses purchased 
and sold in transactions with franchisees were not material either 
individually or in the aggregate to the consolidated financial 
statements for periods prior to purchase and sale.

CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the 
Company and its subsidiaries. Investments in affiliates owned 50% 
or less (primarily McDonald’s Japan) are accounted for by the 
equity method.

On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its business 

relationships such as those with franchisees, joint venture 
partners, developmental licensees, suppliers, and advertising 
cooperatives to identify potential variable interest entities. 
Generally, these businesses qualify for a scope exception under 
the variable interest entity consolidation guidance. The Company 
has concluded that consolidation of any such entity is not 
appropriate for the periods presented.

ESTIMATES IN FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with 
accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires 
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the 
amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying 
notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

REVENUE RECOGNITION
The Company’s revenues consist of sales by Company-operated 
restaurants and fees from franchised restaurants operated by 
conventional franchisees, developmental licensees and foreign 
affiliates.

Sales by Company-operated restaurants are recognized on a 

cash basis. The Company presents sales net of sales tax and 
other sales-related taxes. Revenues from conventional franchised 
restaurants include rent and royalties based on a percent of sales 
with minimum rent payments, and initial fees. Revenues from 
restaurants licensed to foreign affiliates and developmental 
licensees include a royalty based on a percent of sales, and may 
include initial fees. Continuing rent and royalties are recognized in 
the period earned. Initial fees are recognized upon opening of a 
restaurant or granting of a new franchise term, which is when the 
Company has performed substantially all initial services required 
by the franchise arrangement.

FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION
Generally, the functional currency of operations outside the U.S. is 
the respective local currency.

ADVERTISING COSTS
Advertising costs included in operating expenses of Company-
operated restaurants primarily consist of contributions to 
advertising cooperatives and were (in millions): 2013–$808.4; 
2012–$787.5; 2011–$768.6. Production costs for radio and 
television advertising are expensed when the commercials are 
initially aired. These production costs, primarily in the U.S., as well 
as other marketing-related expenses included in Selling, general & 
administrative expenses were (in millions): 2013–$75.4; 2012–
$113.5; 2011–$74.4. Costs related to the Olympics sponsorship 
are included in these expenses for 2012. In addition, significant 
advertising costs are incurred by franchisees through contributions 
to advertising cooperatives in individual markets.

SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION
Share-based compensation includes the portion vesting of all 
share-based awards granted based on the grant date fair value.

Share-based compensation expense and the effect on diluted 

earnings per common share were as follows:

In millions, except per share data
Share-based compensation expense
After tax
Earnings per common share-diluted

2013
$ 89.1
$ 60.6
$ 0.06

2012
$ 93.4
$ 63.2
$ 0.06

2011
$ 86.2
$ 59.2
$ 0.05

Compensation expense related to share-based awards is 
generally amortized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period 
in Selling, general & administrative expenses. As of December 31, 
2013, there was $109.0 million of total unrecognized 
compensation cost related to nonvested share-based 
compensation that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-
average period of 2.0 years.

The fair value of each stock option granted is estimated on 
the date of grant using a closed-form pricing model. The following 
table presents the weighted-average assumptions used in the 
option pricing model for the 2013, 2012 and 2011 stock option 
grants. The expected life of the options represents the period of 
time the options are expected to be outstanding and is based on 
historical trends. Expected stock price volatility is generally based 
on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock for a period 
approximating the expected life. The expected dividend yield is 
based on the Company’s most recent annual dividend rate. The 
risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in 
effect at the time of grant with a term equal to the expected life.

Weighted-average assumptions

Expected dividend yield
Expected stock price volatility
Risk-free interest rate
Expected life of options

(in years)

2013

2012

2011

3.5%
20.6%
1.2%
6.1

2.8%
20.8%
1.1%
6.1

3.2%
21.5%
2.8%
6.3

Fair value per option granted

$11.09

$13.65

$12.18

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property and equipment are stated at cost, with depreciation and 
amortization provided using the straight-line method over the 
following estimated useful lives: buildings–up to 40 years; 
leasehold improvements–the lesser of useful lives of assets or 
lease terms, which generally include option periods; and 
equipment–three to 12 years.

McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report    31
McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report   |   31

 
 
GOODWILL
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over the net tangible 
assets and identifiable intangible assets of acquired restaurant 
businesses. The Company's goodwill primarily results from 
purchases of McDonald's restaurants from franchisees and 
ownership increases in subsidiaries or affiliates, and it is generally 
assigned to the reporting unit expected to benefit from the 
synergies of the combination. If a Company-operated restaurant is 
sold within 24 months of acquisition, the goodwill associated with 
the acquisition is written off in its entirety. If a restaurant is sold 
beyond 24 months from the acquisition, the amount of goodwill 
written off is based on the relative fair value of the business sold 
compared to the reporting unit (defined as each individual 
country).

In millions

Balance at December 31, 2012
Net restaurant purchases (sales)
Currency translation
Balance at December 31, 2013

U.S.

$ 1,294.2
(0.6)

$ 1,293.6

(1)  APMEA represents Asia/Pacific, Middle East and Africa.

(2)  Other Countries & Corporate represents Canada, Latin America and Corporate. 

The Company conducts goodwill impairment testing in the 
fourth quarter of each year or whenever an indicator of impairment 
exists. If an indicator of impairment exists (e.g., estimated 
earnings multiple value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying 
value), the goodwill impairment test compares the fair value of a 
reporting unit, generally based on discounted future cash flows, 
with its carrying amount including goodwill. If the carrying amount 
of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is 
measured as the difference between the implied fair value of the 
reporting unit's goodwill and the carrying amount of goodwill. 
Historically, goodwill impairment has not significantly impacted the 
consolidated financial statements.

The following table presents the 2013 activity in goodwill by 

segment:

Europe

$ 881.4
50.4
26.3
$ 958.1

APMEA(1)
$ 438.7
30.7
(40.7)
$ 428.7

Other Countries
& Corporate(2)
$ 189.7
15.7
(13.1)
$ 192.3

Consolidated

$2,804.0
96.2
(27.5)
$2,872.7

LONG-LIVED ASSETS
Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment annually in the 
fourth quarter and whenever events or changes in circumstances 
indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be 
recoverable. For purposes of annually reviewing McDonald’s 
restaurant assets for potential impairment, assets are initially 
grouped together at a television market level in the U.S. and at a 
country level for each of the international markets. The Company 
manages its restaurants as a group or portfolio with significant 
common costs and promotional activities; as such, an individual 
restaurant’s cash flows are not generally independent of the cash 
flows of others in a market. If an indicator of impairment (e.g., 
negative operating cash flows for the most recent trailing 24-
month period) exists for any grouping of assets, an estimate of 
undiscounted future cash flows produced by each individual 
restaurant within the asset grouping is compared to its carrying 
value. If an individual restaurant is determined to be impaired, the 
loss is measured by the excess of the carrying amount of the 
restaurant over its fair value as determined by an estimate of 
discounted future cash flows.

Losses on assets held for disposal are recognized when 

management and the Board of Directors, as required, have 
approved and committed to a plan to dispose of the assets, the 
assets are available for disposal, the disposal is probable of 
occurring within 12 months, and the net sales proceeds are 
expected to be less than its net book value, among other factors. 
Generally, such losses relate to restaurants that have closed and 
ceased operations as well as other assets that meet the criteria to 
be considered “available for sale”.

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The Company measures certain financial assets and liabilities at 
fair value on a recurring basis, and certain non-financial assets 
and liabilities on a nonrecurring basis. Fair value is defined as the 
price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a 
liability in the principal or most advantageous market in an orderly 
transaction between market participants on the measurement 
date. Fair value disclosures are reflected in a three-level hierarchy, 
maximizing the use of observable inputs and minimizing the use of 
unobservable inputs.

The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of 
inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability on the measurement 
date. The three levels are defined as follows:

Level 1 – inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted 
prices (unadjusted) for an identical asset or liability in an 
active market.

Level 2 – inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted 
prices for a similar asset or liability in an active market or 
model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are 
observable for substantially the full term of the asset or 
liability.

Level 3 – inputs to the valuation methodology are 
unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement 
of the asset or liability.

Certain of the Company’s derivatives are valued using various 

pricing models or discounted cash flow analyses that incorporate 
observable market parameters, such as interest rate yield curves, 
option volatilities and currency rates, classified as Level 2 within 
the valuation hierarchy. Derivative valuations incorporate credit 
risk adjustments that are necessary to reflect the probability of 
default by the counterparty or the Company. 

32    McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report
32   |   McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report

Certain Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair 
Value

The following tables present financial assets and liabilities 
measured at fair value on a recurring basis by the valuation 
hierarchy as defined in the fair value guidance:  

December 31, 2013

In millions

Investments
Derivative assets
Total assets at fair value

Level 1*

$ 27.6
128.2
$ 155.8

Level 2

$ 71.6
$ 71.6

Carrying
Value

$ 27.6
199.8
$ 227.4

Derivative liabilities

Total liabilities at fair value

$(179.3)

$(179.3)

$(179.3)

$(179.3)

December 31, 2012

In millions

Investments
Derivative assets
Total assets at fair value

Level 1*

$ 155.1
132.3
$ 287.4

Level 2

$ 86.1
$ 86.1

Carrying
Value

$ 155.1
218.4
$ 373.5

Derivative liabilities

Total liabilities at fair value

$ (42.6)
  $ (42.6)

$ (42.6)

$ (42.6)

* 

Level 1 is comprised of investments and derivatives that hedge market 
driven changes in liabilities associated with the Company’s supplemental 
benefit plans.

Non-Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair 
Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a 
nonrecurring basis; that is, the assets and liabilities are not 
measured at fair value on an ongoing basis, but are subject to fair 
value adjustments in certain circumstances (e.g., when there is 
evidence of impairment). For the year ended December 31, 2013, 
no material fair value adjustments or fair value measurements 
were required for non-financial assets or liabilities.

Certain Financial Assets and Liabilities not Measured at 
Fair Value

At December 31, 2013, the fair value of the Company’s debt 
obligations was estimated at $15.0 billion, compared to a carrying 
amount of $14.1 billion. The fair value was based on quoted 
market prices, Level 2 within the valuation hierarchy. The carrying 
amount for both cash equivalents and notes receivable 
approximate fair value.

FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
The Company is exposed to global market risks, including the 
effect of changes in interest rates and foreign currency 
fluctuations. The Company uses foreign currency denominated 
debt and derivative instruments to mitigate the impact of these 
changes. The Company does not hold or issue derivatives for 
trading purposes.

The Company documents its risk management objective and 

strategy for undertaking hedging transactions, as well as all 
relationships between hedging instruments and hedged items. The 
Company’s derivatives that are designated for hedge accounting 
consist mainly of interest rate swaps, foreign currency forwards, 
foreign currency options, and cross-currency swaps, further 
explained in the "Fair Value," "Cash Flow" and "Net Investment" 
hedge sections.

The Company also enters into certain derivatives that are not 
designated for hedge accounting. The Company has entered into 
equity derivative contracts, including total return swaps, to hedge 
market-driven changes in certain of its supplemental benefit plan 
liabilities. Changes in the fair value of these derivatives are 
recorded primarily in Selling, general & administrative expenses 
together with the changes in the supplemental benefit plan 
liabilities. In addition, the Company uses foreign currency forwards 
to mitigate the change in fair value of certain foreign currency 
denominated assets and liabilities. Since these derivatives are not 
designated for hedge accounting, the changes in the fair value of 
these derivatives are recognized immediately in Nonoperating 
(income) expense together with the currency gain or loss from the 
hedged balance sheet position. A portion of the Company’s foreign 
currency options (more fully described in the "Cash Flow Hedges" 
section) are undesignated as hedging instruments as the 
underlying foreign currency royalties are earned.

All derivative instruments designated for hedge accounting 
are classified as fair value, cash flow or net investment hedges. All 
derivatives (including those not designated for hedge accounting) 
are recognized on the Consolidated balance sheet at fair value 
and classified based on the instruments’ maturity dates. Changes 
in the fair value measurements of the derivative instruments are 
reflected as adjustments to other comprehensive income ("OCI") 
and/or current earnings.

McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report    33
McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report   |   33

 
 
The following table presents the fair values of derivative instruments included on the Consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 

2013 and 2012:

In millions
Derivatives designated for hedge accounting

Balance Sheet Classification

2013

2012 Balance Sheet Classification

2013

2012

Derivative Assets

Derivative Liabilities

Foreign currency

Interest rate

Commodity

Foreign currency

Interest rate

Prepaid expenses and other

current assets

Prepaid expenses and other

current assets

Miscellaneous other assets

Miscellaneous other assets

Miscellaneous other assets

$ 28.3

$

5.0

Accrued payroll and other

liabilities

$ (28.8) $ (3.5)

—

—

2.5

24.8

4.2

35.3 Other long-term liabilities

2.5 Other long-term liabilities

38.1 Other long-term liabilities

—

(114.7)

(12.0)

(0.2)

(32.1)

—

$ (155.5) $ (35.8)

Total derivatives designated for hedge accounting

$ 55.6

$ 85.1

Derivatives not designated for hedge accounting

Equity

Foreign currency

Equity

Prepaid expenses and other

current assets

Prepaid expenses and other

current assets

Miscellaneous other assets

Total derivatives not designated for hedge accounting

Total derivatives

$

6.7

$ 132.3

9.3

128.2

1.0

—

$ 144.2

$ 133.3

$ 199.8

$ 218.4

Accrued payroll and other

liabilities

$ (23.8) $ (6.8)

$ (23.8) $ (6.8)

$ (179.3) $ (42.6)

The following table presents the pretax amounts affecting income and OCI for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, 

respectively:

In millions

Derivatives in
Fair Value
Hedging
Relationships

Interest rate

Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income
on Derivative

Hedged Items in
Fair Value
Hedging
 Relationships

2013
$ (29.5)

2012

$ (13.0) Fixed-rate debt

Derivatives in
Cash Flow
Hedging
Relationships

Gain (Loss) Recognized in 
Accumulated OCI on 
Derivative
(Effective Portion)

Gain (Loss)
Reclassified into Income
from Accumulated OCI
 (Effective Portion)

Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income on
Related Hedged Items

2013
$29.5

2012
$ 13.0

Gain (Loss)
Recognized in Income on
Derivative (Amount Excluded
from Effectiveness Testing and
Ineffective Portion)

Commodity
Foreign currency
Interest rate(1)
Total

2013
$ (34.1)
(65.5)
—
$ (99.6)

2012
$ 35.1
(6.4)
(4.6)
$ 24.1

2013

2012

$ (50.3)
(0.4)
$ (50.7)

$ (15.8)
0.5
$ (15.3)

2013

$ (6.1)
—
$ (6.1)

2012

$ (12.3)
—
$ (12.3)

Net Investment
Hedging Relationships

Foreign currency denominated debt
Foreign currency derivatives
Total

Gain (Loss)
Recognized in
Accumulated OCI
(Effective Portion)

2013
$(382.8)
(18.4)
$(401.2)

2012
$ (61.7)
(23.3)
$ (85.0)

Derivatives Not
Designated for
Hedge
Accounting

Gain (Loss)
Recognized in
Income
on Derivative

Foreign currency
Equity(2)
Total

2013
$ (30.2)
21.8
$ (8.4)

2012
$ (13.4)
(16.2)
$ (29.6)

Gains (losses) recognized in income on derivatives are recorded in Nonoperating (income) expense, net unless otherwise noted.

(1)  The amount of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated OCI into income is recorded in Interest expense.

(2)  The amount of gain (loss) recognized in income on the derivatives used to hedge the supplemental benefit plan liabilities is primarily recorded in Selling, general & 

administrative expenses.

34    McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report
34   |   McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report

  
 
 
 
 
 
Fair Value Hedges

The Company enters into fair value hedges to reduce the
exposure to changes in the fair values of certain liabilities. The 
Company's fair value hedges convert a portion of its fixed-rate 
debt into floating-rate debt by use of interest rate swaps. At 
December 31, 2013, $2.2 billion of the Company's outstanding 
fixed-rate debt was effectively converted. All of the Company’s 
interest rate swaps meet the shortcut method requirements. 
Accordingly, changes in the fair value of the interest rate swaps 
are exactly offset by changes in the fair value of the underlying 
debt. No ineffectiveness has been recorded to net income related 
to interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges for the year 
ended December 31, 2013.

Cash Flow Hedges

The Company enters into cash flow hedges to reduce the 
exposure to variability in certain expected future cash flows. The 
types of cash flow hedges the Company enters into include 
interest rate swaps, foreign currency forwards, foreign currency 
options and cross currency swaps.

The Company periodically uses interest rate swaps to 
effectively convert a portion of floating-rate debt, including 
forecasted debt issuances, into fixed-rate debt. The agreements 
are intended to reduce the impact of interest rate changes on 
future interest expense. 

To protect against the reduction in value of forecasted foreign 

currency cash flows (such as royalties denominated in foreign 
currencies), the Company uses foreign currency forwards and 
foreign currency options to hedge a portion of anticipated 
exposures.

When the U.S. dollar strengthens against foreign currencies, 

the decline in value of future foreign denominated royalties is 
offset by gains in the fair value of the foreign currency forwards 
and/or foreign currency options. Conversely, when the U.S. dollar 
weakens, the increase in the value of future foreign denominated 
royalties is offset by losses in the fair value of the foreign currency 
forwards and/or foreign currency options.

Although the fair value changes in the foreign currency 

options may fluctuate over the period of the contract, the 
Company’s total loss on a foreign currency option is limited to the 
upfront premium paid for the contract; however, the potential gains 
on a foreign currency option are unlimited. In some situations, the 
Company uses foreign currency collars, which limit the potential 
gains and lower the upfront premium paid, to protect against 
currency movements.

The hedges cover the next 19 months for certain exposures 
and are denominated in various currencies. As of December 31, 
2013, the Company had derivatives outstanding with an equivalent 
notional amount of $730.3 million that were used to hedge a 
portion of forecasted foreign currency denominated royalties.

The Company excludes the time value of foreign currency 
options from its effectiveness assessment on its cash flow hedges. 
As a result, changes in the fair value of the derivatives due to this 
component, as well as the ineffectiveness of the hedges, are 
recognized in earnings currently. The effective portion of the gains 
or losses on the derivatives is reported in the cash flow hedging 
component of OCI in shareholders’ equity and reclassified into 
earnings in the same period or periods in which the hedged 
transaction affects earnings.

The Company uses cross-currency swaps to hedge the risk of 

cash flows associated with certain foreign currency denominated 
debt, including forecasted interest payments, and has elected 
cash flow hedge accounting. The hedges cover periods up to 47 
months and have an equivalent notional amount of $346.9 million.
The Company manages its exposure to energy-related 
transactions in certain markets by entering into purchase and sale 
agreements.  Previously, some of these agreements were 

considered commodity forwards and the Company elected cash 
flow hedge accounting, the impact of which was immaterial.  In 
2013, the Company determined these transactions were now 
eligible for the normal purchase/normal sale scope exception, 
which meant no further derivative or hedge accounting was 
required.  

The Company recorded after tax adjustments to the cash flow 

hedging component of accumulated OCI in shareholders’ equity. 
The Company recorded a net decrease of $37.5 million for the 
year ended December 31, 2013 and a net increase of $30.6 
million for the year ended December 31, 2012. Based on 
interest rates and foreign exchange rates at December 31, 2013, 
the $2.3 million in cumulative cash flow hedging losses, after tax, 
at December 31, 2013, is not expected to have a significant effect 
on earnings over the next 12 months.

Net Investment Hedges

The Company primarily uses foreign currency denominated debt 
(third party and intercompany) to hedge its investments in certain 
foreign subsidiaries and affiliates. Realized and unrealized 
translation adjustments from these hedges are included in 
shareholders’ equity in the foreign currency translation component 
of OCI and offset translation adjustments on the underlying net 
assets of foreign subsidiaries and affiliates, which also are 
recorded in OCI. As of December 31, 2013, $4.7 billion of the 
Company’s third party foreign currency denominated debt, $4.2 
billion of intercompany foreign currency denominated debt, and 
$827.4 million of derivatives were designated to hedge 
investments in certain foreign subsidiaries and affiliates.

Credit Risk

The Company is exposed to credit-related losses in the event of 
non-performance by the counterparties to its hedging instruments. 
The counterparties to these agreements consist of a diverse group 
of financial institutions and market participants. The Company 
continually monitors its positions and the credit ratings of its 
counterparties and adjusts positions as appropriate. The Company 
did not have significant exposure to any individual counterparty at 
December 31, 2013 and has master agreements that contain 
netting arrangements. For financial reporting purposes, the 
Company presents gross derivative balances in the financial 
statements and supplementary data, even for counterparties 
subject to netting arrangements. Some of these agreements also 
require each party to post collateral if credit ratings fall below, or 
aggregate exposures exceed, certain contractual limits. At 
December 31, 2013, neither the Company nor its counterparties 
were required to post collateral on any derivative position, other 
than on hedges of certain of the Company’s supplemental benefit 
plan liabilities where its counterparties were required to post 
collateral on their liability positions.

INCOME TAX UNCERTAINTIES
The Company, like other multi-national companies, is regularly 
audited by federal, state and foreign tax authorities, and tax 
assessments may arise several years after tax returns have been 
filed. Accordingly, tax liabilities are recorded when, in 
management’s judgment, a tax position does not meet the more 
likely than not threshold for recognition. For tax positions that meet 
the more likely than not threshold, a tax liability may still be 
recorded depending on management’s assessment of how the tax 
position will ultimately be settled.

The Company records interest and penalties on unrecognized 

tax benefits in the provision for income taxes.

McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report    35
McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report   |   35

 
PER COMMON SHARE INFORMATION
Diluted earnings per common share is calculated using net income 
divided by diluted weighted-average shares. Diluted weighted-
average shares include weighted-average shares outstanding plus 
the dilutive effect of share-based compensation calculated using 
the treasury stock method, of (in millions of shares): 2013–7.6; 
2012–10.1; 2011–12.8. Stock options that were not included in 
diluted weighted-average shares because they would have been 
antidilutive were (in millions of shares): 2013–4.7; 2012–4.7; 
2011–0.0.

The Company has elected to exclude the pro forma deferred 
tax asset associated with share-based compensation in earnings 
per share.

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
The Company considers short-term, highly liquid investments with 
an original maturity of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents.

SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company evaluated subsequent events through the date the 
financial statements were issued and filed with the U.S. Securities 
and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). There were no subsequent 
events that required recognition or disclosure.

Property and Equipment

Net property and equipment consisted of:

In millions

Land
Buildings and improvements

on owned land

Buildings and improvements

on leased land

Equipment, signs and

seating

Other

Accumulated depreciation

and amortization

Net property and equipment

December 31, 2013

2012

$ 5,849.3

$ 5,612.6

14,715.6

14,089.0

13,825.2

12,970.8

5,376.8
588.7
40,355.6

5,241.0
577.7
38,491.1

(14,608.3)
$ 25,747.3

(13,813.9)
$ 24,677.2

Depreciation and amortization expense for property and 
equipment was (in millions): 2013–$1,498.8; 2012–$1,402.2; 
2011–$1,329.6.

Other Operating (Income) Expense, Net

In millions

Gains on sales of restaurant

businesses

Equity in earnings of

unconsolidated affiliates

Asset dispositions and other

expense

Total

2013

2012

2011

$ (199.4) $ (151.5) $ (81.8)

(78.2)

(143.5)

(178.0)

30.4

51.5

23.0

$ (247.2) $ (243.5) $ (236.8)

Gains on sales of restaurant businesses

The Company’s purchases and sales of businesses with its 
franchisees are aimed at achieving an optimal ownership mix in 
each market. Resulting gains or losses on sales of restaurant 
businesses are recorded in operating income because these 
transactions are a recurring part of our business.

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

Unconsolidated affiliates and partnerships are businesses in which 
the Company actively participates but does not control. The 
Company records equity in earnings from these entities 
representing McDonald’s share of results. For foreign affiliated 
markets—primarily Japan—results are reported after interest 
expense and income taxes. McDonald’s share of results for 
partnerships in certain consolidated markets such as the U.S. are 
reported before income taxes. These partnership restaurants are 
operated under conventional franchise arrangements and, 
therefore, are classified as conventional franchised restaurants.

Asset dispositions and other expense

Asset dispositions and other expense consists of gains or losses 
on excess property and other asset dispositions, provisions for 
restaurant closings and uncollectible receivables, asset write-offs 
due to restaurant reinvestment, and other miscellaneous income 
and expenses.

Contingencies

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is subject to 
proceedings, lawsuits and other claims primarily related to 
competitors, customers, employees, franchisees, government 
agencies, intellectual property, shareholders and suppliers. The 
Company is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse 
judgments or outcomes to these matters as well as potential 
ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of 
accrual required, if any, for these contingencies is made after 
careful analysis of each matter. The required accrual may change 
in the future due to new developments in each matter or changes 
in approach such as a change in settlement strategy in dealing 
with these matters. The Company does not believe that any such 
matter currently being reviewed will have a material adverse effect 
on its financial condition or results of operations.

36    McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report
36   |   McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report

 
Franchise Arrangements

Conventional franchise arrangements generally include a lease 
and a license and provide for payment of initial fees, as well as 
continuing rent and royalties to the Company based upon a 
percent of sales with minimum rent payments that parallel the 
Company’s underlying leases and escalations (on properties that 
are leased). Under this arrangement, franchisees are granted the 
right to operate a restaurant using the McDonald’s System and, in 
most cases, the use of a restaurant facility, generally for a period 
of 20 years. These franchisees pay related occupancy costs 
including property taxes, insurance and maintenance. Affiliates 
and developmental licensees operating under license agreements 
pay a royalty to the Company based upon a percent of sales, and 
may pay initial fees.

Revenues from franchised restaurants consisted of:

In millions

Rents
Royalties
Initial fees
Revenues from franchised 

restaurants

2013
$ 6,054.4
3,100.4
76.7

2012
$ 5,863.5
3,032.6
68.4

2011
$ 5,718.5
2,929.8
64.9

$ 9,231.5

$ 8,964.5

$ 8,713.2

Future minimum rent payments due to the Company under 

existing franchise arrangements are:

In millions

Owned sites

Leased sites

Total

2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Thereafter
Total minimum payments

$ 1,321.4
1,279.4
1,228.5
1,166.9
1,121.9
9,636.4
$15,754.5

$ 1,381.8
1,332.3
1,278.2
1,209.7
1,138.6
8,405.8
$14,746.4

$ 2,703.2
2,611.7
2,506.7
2,376.6
2,260.5
18,042.2
$30,500.9

At December 31, 2013, net property and equipment under 
franchise arrangements totaled $15.5 billion (including land of $4.4 
billion) after deducting accumulated depreciation and amortization 
of $8.1 billion.

Leasing Arrangements

At December 31, 2013, the Company was the lessee at 14,815 
restaurant locations through ground leases (the Company leases 
the land and the Company or franchisee owns the building) and 
through improved leases (the Company leases land and 
buildings). Lease terms for most restaurants, where market 
conditions allow, are generally for 20 years and, in many cases, 
provide for rent escalations and renewal options, with certain 
leases providing purchase options. Escalation terms vary by 
geographic segment with examples including fixed-rent 
escalations, escalations based on an inflation index, and fair-value 
market adjustments. The timing of these escalations generally 
ranges from annually to every five years. For most locations, the 
Company is obligated for the related occupancy costs including 
property taxes, insurance and maintenance; however, for 
franchised sites, the Company requires the franchisees to pay 
these costs. In addition, the Company is the lessee under non-
cancelable leases covering certain offices and vehicles.

The following table provides detail of rent expense:

In millions
Company-operated

restaurants:

U.S.
Outside the U.S.

Total

Franchised restaurants:
U.S.
Outside the U.S.

Total

Other
Total rent expense

2013

2012

2011

$

61.6
713.4
775.0

$

59.1
661.0
720.1

$

55.9
620.4
676.3

441.6
572.0
1,013.6
104.0
$ 1,892.6

433.0
519.7
952.7
104.2
$ 1,777.0

420.0
514.7
934.7
101.7
$ 1,712.7

Rent expense included percent rents in excess of minimum 

rents (in millions) as follows–Company-operated restaurants: 
2013–$175.6; 2012–$169.6; 2011–$165.2. Franchised 
restaurants: 2013–$187.4; 2012–$178.7; 2011–$173.4.

Future minimum payments required under existing operating 

leases with initial terms of one year or more are:

In millions
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
Thereafter
Total minimum payments

Restaurant
$ 1,361.5
1,266.3
1,160.4
1,051.4
947.7
7,444.9
$13,232.2

Other
$ 78.9
67.5
57.9
47.4
42.0
187.0
$ 480.7

Total
$ 1,440.4
1,333.8
1,218.3
1,098.8
989.7
7,631.9
$13,712.9

Income Taxes

Income before provision for income taxes, classified by source of 
income, was as follows:

In millions

U.S.
Outside the U.S.
Income before provision for

income taxes

2013
$ 2,912.7
5,291.8

2012
$ 2,879.7
5,199.3

2011
$ 3,202.8
4,809.4

$ 8,204.5

$ 8,079.0

$ 8,012.2

The provision for income taxes, classified by the timing and 

location of payment, was as follows:

In millions

U.S. federal
U.S. state
Outside the U.S.

Current tax provision

U.S. federal
U.S. state
Outside the U.S.

Deferred tax provision
Provision for income taxes

2013
$ 1,238.2
175.0
1,180.2
2,593.4
46.2
(6.7)
(14.3)
25.2
$ 2,618.6

2012
$ 1,129.9
189.8
1,160.0
2,479.7
144.9
5.5
(15.9)
134.5
$ 2,614.2

2011
$ 1,173.4
165.2
982.1
2,320.7
189.0
8.6
(9.2)
188.4
$ 2,509.1

McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report    37
McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report   |   37

 
Net deferred tax liabilities consisted of:

In millions

Property and equipment
Other

Total deferred tax liabilities

Property and equipment
Employee benefit plans
Intangible assets
Deferred foreign tax credits
Operating loss carryforwards
Other

December 31, 2013
$ 1,812.4
639.8
2,452.2
(407.9)
(388.9)
(210.1)
(192.3)
(154.0)
(347.6)

2012
$ 1,713.9
636.4
2,350.3
(403.6)
(362.9)
(258.0)
(179.5)
(92.4)
(319.4)

Total deferred tax assets

before valuation allowance

Valuation allowance
Net deferred tax liabilities
Balance sheet presentation:
Deferred income taxes
Other assets-miscellaneous
Current assets-prepaid expenses

and other current assets

Net deferred tax liabilities

(1,700.8)
172.8
$ 924.2

(1,615.8)
127.0
$ 861.5

$ 1,647.7
(621.4)

$ 1,531.1
(603.6)

(102.1)
$ 924.2

(66.0)
$ 861.5

The statutory U.S. federal income tax rate reconciles to the 

effective income tax rates as follows:

Statutory U.S. federal income tax rate
State income taxes, net of related

federal income tax benefit

Benefits and taxes related to foreign

operations

Other, net
Effective income tax rates

2012

2013
35.0% 35.0% 35.0%

2011

1.3

1.6

1.4

(4.1)
(4.0)
(0.1)
(0.4)
31.9% 32.4% 31.3%

(4.7)
(0.4)

As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company’s gross 

unrecognized tax benefits totaled $512.7 million and $482.4 
million, respectively. After considering the deferred tax accounting 
impact, it is expected that about $380 million of the total as of 
December 31, 2013 would favorably affect the effective tax rate if 
resolved in the Company’s favor.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning 

and ending amounts of unrecognized tax benefits:

In millions

Balance at January 1
Decreases for positions taken in prior years
Increases for positions taken in prior years
Increases for positions related to the current

year

Settlements with taxing authorities
Lapsing of statutes of limitations
Balance at December 31(1)

2013
$ 482.4
(38.3)
29.4

2012
$ 565.0
(65.7)
36.9

53.8
(2.4)
(12.2)

47.3
(95.8)
(5.3)

$ 512.7

$ 482.4

(1)  Of this amount, $495.1 million and $481.7 million are included in long-term 

liabilities for 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $16.8 million is included in 
current liabilities - income taxes for 2013 on the Consolidated balance 
sheet. The remainder is included in deferred income taxes on the 
Consolidated balance sheet.

38    McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report
38   |   McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report

In December 2012, the Company reached a final settlement 

with the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") Appeals Division 
regarding its U.S. federal income tax returns for 2007 and 2008. 
The Company agreed to a settlement of about $80 million, 
primarily related to proposed foreign tax credit adjustments of 
about $400 million. The liabilities previously recorded and 
determined in accordance with Topic 740 - Income Taxes of the 
Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") related to this matter 
were adequate. Additionally, no cash payment was made related 
to this settlement as the Company had previously made a tax 
deposit with the IRS. The agreement did not have a material 
impact on the Company's cash flows, results of operations or 
financial position.

The Company's 2009 and 2010 U.S. federal income tax 
returns are currently under examination and the completion of the 
field examination is expected in 2014. In connection with this 
examination, the Company agreed to certain adjustments that 
have been proposed by the IRS and appropriately accounted for 
these adjustments in accordance with ASC 740. The Company is 
also under audit in multiple state and foreign tax jurisdictions. It is 
reasonably possible that the audits in certain of these jurisdictions 
could be completed within 12 months. Due to the expected 
settlement of the 2009 and 2010 IRS agreed adjustments, the 
possible completion of the aforementioned state and foreign tax 
audits and the expiration of the statute of limitations in multiple tax 
jurisdictions, it is reasonably possible that the total amount of 
unrecognized tax benefits could decrease within the next 12 
months by $120 million to $140 million, of which $5 million to $10 
million could favorably affect the effective tax rate. 

Also in connection with the Company’s 2009 and 2010 U.S. 

federal income tax returns, the Company received notices of 
proposed adjustments ("NOPAs") in 2014 and expects to receive 
additional NOPAs within the next 12 months from the IRS related 
to certain transfer pricing matters. It is reasonably possible that the 
receipt of these future NOPAs will provide new information that 
causes the Company to reassess the total amount of 
unrecognized tax benefits recorded. In addition, the Company is 
currently under audit in other tax jurisdictions. Completion of the 
tax audits for certain jurisdictions is not expected within 12 
months. However, it is reasonably possible that, as a result 
of audit progression within the next 12 months, there may be new 
information that causes the Company to reassess the total amount 
of unrecognized tax benefits recorded. While the Company cannot 
estimate the impact that new information may have on our 
unrecognized tax benefit balance, we believe that the liabilities 
recorded are appropriate and adequate as determined under ASC 
740.

The Company is generally no longer subject to U.S. federal, 

state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax 
authorities for years prior to 2007.

The Company had $55.4 million and $37.7 million accrued for 

interest and penalties at December 31, 2013 and 2012, 
respectively. The Company recognized interest and penalties 
related to tax matters of $14.4 million in 2013, $11.2 million in 
2012, and $4.8 million in 2011, which are included in the provision 
for income taxes.

Deferred U.S. income taxes have not been recorded for 

temporary differences related to investments in certain foreign 
subsidiaries and corporate joint ventures. These temporary 
differences were approximately $16.1 billion at December 31, 
2013 and consisted primarily of undistributed earnings considered 
permanently invested in operations outside the U.S. Determination 
of the deferred income tax liability on these unremitted earnings is 
not practicable because such liability, if any, is dependent on 
circumstances existing if and when remittance occurs. 

Segment and Geographic Information

The Company operates in the global restaurant industry and 
manages its business as distinct geographic segments. All 
intercompany revenues and expenses are eliminated in computing 
revenues and operating income. Corporate general and 
administrative expenses are included in Other Countries & 
Corporate and consist of home office support costs in areas such 
as facilities, finance, human resources, information technology, 
legal, marketing, restaurant operations, supply chain and training. 
Corporate assets include corporate cash and equivalents, asset 
portions of financial instruments and home office facilities.

In millions

U.S.
Europe
APMEA
Other Countries & 
   Corporate

Total revenues

U.S.
Europe
APMEA
Other Countries & 
   Corporate

Total operating income

U.S.
Europe
APMEA
Other Countries & 
   Corporate

Total assets

U.S.
Europe
APMEA
Other Countries & 
   Corporate

Total capital

expenditures

U.S.
Europe
APMEA
Other Countries & 
   Corporate

2013
$ 8,851.3
11,299.8
6,477.2

2012
$ 8,813.7
10,827.4
6,391.1

2011
$ 8,528.2
10,886.4
6,019.5

1,477.4
$ 28,105.7
$ 3,779.3
3,370.6
1,479.7

134.7
$ 8,764.3
$ 11,711.8
15,096.3
6,202.7

3,615.5
$ 36,626.3
875.5
$
1,157.3
654.6

1,534.8
$ 27,567.0
$ 3,750.4
3,195.8
1,566.1

92.3
$ 8,604.6
$ 11,431.6
14,223.3
6,419.3

3,312.3
$ 35,386.5
$ 1,065.0
1,114.7
716.6

1,571.9
$ 27,006.0
$ 3,666.2
3,226.7
1,525.8

111.0
$ 8,529.7
$ 10,865.5
12,015.1
5,824.2

4,285.1
$ 32,989.9
786.5
$
1,130.1
614.1

137.3

152.9

199.1

$ 2,824.7
503.6
$
627.1
319.2

$ 3,049.2
477.1
$
573.5
296.2

$ 2,729.8
446.0
$
570.3
267.5

135.2

141.7

131.2

Total depreciation and

amortization

$ 1,585.1

$ 1,488.5

$ 1,415.0

Total long-lived assets, primarily property and equipment, 

were (in millions)–Consolidated: 2013–$30,679.8; 2012– 
$29,644.5; 2011–$27,587.6; U.S. based: 2013–$11,632.2; 2012–
$11,308.7; 2011–$10,724.9.

Debt Financing

LINE OF CREDIT AGREEMENTS
At December 31, 2013, the Company had a $1.5 billion line of 
credit agreement expiring in November 2016 with fees of 
0.065% per annum on the total commitment, which remained 
unused. Fees and interest rates on this line are based on the 
Company’s long-term credit rating assigned by Moody’s and 
Standard & Poor’s. In addition, the Company's subsidiaries had 
unused lines of credit that were primarily uncommitted, short-term 
and denominated in various currencies at local market rates of 
interest.

The weighted-average interest rate of short-term borrowings 

was 5.1% at December 31, 2013 (based on $609.7 million of 
foreign currency bank line borrowings) and 4.1% at December 31, 
2012 (based on $581.3 million of foreign currency bank line 
borrowings and $200.0 million of commercial paper).

DEBT OBLIGATIONS
The Company has incurred debt obligations principally through 
public and private offerings and bank loans. There are no 
provisions in the Company’s debt obligations that would accelerate 
repayment of debt as a result of a change in credit ratings or a 
material adverse change in the Company’s business. Certain of 
the Company’s debt obligations contain cross-acceleration 
provisions, and restrictions on Company and subsidiary 
mortgages and the long-term debt of certain subsidiaries. Under 
certain agreements, the Company has the option to retire debt 
prior to maturity, either at par or at a premium over par. The 
Company has no current plans to retire a significant amount of its 
debt prior to maturity.

ESOP LOANS
Borrowings related to the leveraged Employee Stock Ownership 
Plan ("ESOP") at December 31, 2013, which include $23.2 million 
of loans from the Company to the ESOP, are reflected as debt with 
a corresponding reduction of shareholders’ equity (additional paid-
in capital included a balance of $19.9 million and $27.2 million at 
December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively). The ESOP is 
repaying the loans and interest through 2018 using Company 
contributions and dividends from its McDonald’s common stock 
holdings. As the principal amount of the borrowings is repaid, the 
debt and the unearned ESOP compensation (additional paid-in 
capital) are reduced.

McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report    39
McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report   |   39

 
The following table summarizes the Company’s debt obligations (interest rates and debt amounts reflected in the table include the 

effects of interest rate swaps).

Interest rates(1)
December 31

Amounts outstanding
December 31

In millions of U.S. Dollars

Fixed
Floating

Total U.S. Dollars

Fixed
Floating

Total Euro

Fixed
Floating

Total Japanese Yen
Total British Pounds Sterling-Fixed

Fixed
Floating

Total Chinese Renminbi

Fixed
Floating

Total other currencies(2)

Debt obligations before fair value adjustments(3)
Fair value adjustments(4)
Total debt obligations(5)

Maturity dates

2013

2012

4.6%
3.2

4.8%
1.2

2014-2043

2014-2025

2014-2030
2020-2032

2014

2014-2021

3.3
2.8

2.9
0.4

6.0
—
5.4

1.9
3.6

3.7
2.9

2.9
0.4

6.0
3.0
5.6

1.9
4.4

2013
$ 6,460.6
1,900.0
8,360.6
2,884.9
357.2
3,242.1
118.7
759.8
878.5
744.3
—
525.1
525.1
281.0
85.4

366.4

14,117.0

12.8

2012
$ 7,075.7
1,650.0
8,725.7
1,847.2
348.0
2,195.2
144.2
923.3
1,067.5
730.1
32.1
470.8
502.9
273.3
95.5

368.8

13,590.2

42.3

$14,129.8

$13,632.5

(1)  Weighted-average effective rate, computed on a semi-annual basis.

(2)  Primarily consists of Swiss Francs and Korean Won.

(3)  Aggregate maturities for 2013 debt balances, before fair value adjustments, were as follows (in millions): 2014–$0.0; 2015–$1,199.2; 2016–$2,094.6; 2017–

$1,054.2; 2018–$1,003.9; Thereafter–$8,765.1. These amounts include a reclassification of short-term obligations totaling $1.2 billion to long-term obligations as 
they are supported by a long-term line of credit agreement expiring in November 2016.

(4)  The carrying value of underlying items in fair value hedges, in this case debt obligations, are adjusted for fair value changes to the extent they are attributable to 
the risk designated as being hedged. The related hedging instrument is also recorded at fair value in prepaid expenses and other current assets, miscellaneous 
other assets or other long-term liabilities. 

(5)  The increase in debt obligations from December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2013 was primarily due to net issuances of $0.5 billion.

Employee Benefit Plans

The Company’s Profit Sharing and Savings Plan for U.S.-based 
employees includes a 401(k) feature, a regular employee match 
feature, and a discretionary employer profit sharing match. The 
401(k) feature allows participants to make pretax contributions that 
are matched each pay period from shares released under the 
ESOP. The Profit Sharing and Savings Plan also provides for a 
discretionary employer profit sharing match after the end of the 
year for those participants eligible to share in the match.

All current account balances and future contributions and 

related earnings can be invested in several investment 
alternatives as well as McDonald’s common stock in accordance 
with each participant’s elections. Participants’ contributions to the 
401(k) feature and the discretionary employer matching 
contribution feature are limited to 20% investment in McDonald’s 
common stock. Participants may choose to make separate 
investment choices for current account balances and for future 
contributions.

The Company also maintains certain nonqualified 

supplemental benefit plans that allow participants to (i) make tax-
deferred contributions and (ii) receive Company-provided 
allocations that cannot be made under the Profit Sharing and 
Savings Plan because of IRS limitations. The investment 
alternatives and returns are based on certain market-rate 
investment alternatives under the Profit Sharing and Savings Plan. 

40    McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report

40   |   McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report

Total liabilities were $531.1 million at December 31, 2013, and 
$493.5 million at December 31, 2012, and were primarily included 
in other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated balance sheet.

The Company has entered into derivative contracts to hedge 

market-driven changes in certain of the liabilities. At December 31, 
2013, derivatives with a fair value of $128.2 million indexed to the 
Company's stock and a total return swap with a notional amount of 
$181.4 million indexed to certain market indices were included at 
their fair value in Miscellaneous other assets and Prepaid 
expenses and other current assets, respectively, on the 
Consolidated balance sheet. Changes in liabilities for these 
nonqualified plans and in the fair value of the derivatives are 
recorded primarily in Selling, general & administrative expenses. 
Changes in fair value of the derivatives indexed to the Company’s 
stock are recorded in the income statement because the contracts 
provide the counterparty with a choice to settle in cash or shares. 
Total U.S. costs for the Profit Sharing and Savings Plan, 
including nonqualified benefits and related hedging activities, were 
(in millions): 2013–$21.9; 2012–$27.9; 2011–$41.3. Certain 
subsidiaries outside the U.S. also offer profit sharing, stock 
purchase or other similar benefit plans. Total plan costs outside 
the U.S. were (in millions): 2013–$51.2; 2012–$62.5; 2011–$58.3.
The total combined liabilities for international retirement plans 

were $75.0 million and $77.7 million at December 31, 2013 and 
2012, respectively. Other post-retirement benefits and post- 
employment benefits were immaterial.

Share-based Compensation

The Company maintains a share-based compensation plan which authorizes the granting of various equity-based incentives including stock 
options and restricted stock units (RSUs) to employees and nonemployee directors. The number of shares of common stock reserved for 
issuance under the plans was 73.1 million at December 31, 2013, including 46.0 million available for future grants.

STOCK OPTIONS
Stock options to purchase common stock are granted with an exercise price equal to the closing market price of the Company’s stock on the 
date of grant. Substantially all of the options become exercisable in four equal installments, beginning a year from the date of the grant, and 
generally expire 10 years from the grant date. 

Intrinsic value for stock options is defined as the difference between the current market value of the Company’s stock and the exercise 
price. During 2013, 2012 and 2011, the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised was $325.2 million, $469.8 million and $416.5 million, 
respectively. Cash received from stock options exercised during 2013 was $233.3 million and the tax benefit realized from stock options 
exercised totaled $98.9 million. The Company uses treasury shares purchased under the Company’s share repurchase program to satisfy 
share-based exercises.

A summary of the status of the Company’s stock option grants as of December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, and changes during the years 

then ended, is presented in the following table:

Options

Outstanding at beginning of year
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited/expired
Outstanding at end of year
Exercisable at end of year

Shares in
millions

27.4
3.7
(5.7)
(0.3)
25.1
15.6

Weighted-
average
exercise
price

$ 59.86
94.36
40.12
79.15
$ 69.15
$ 56.43

Weighted-
average
remaining
contractual
life in years

2013

Aggregate
intrinsic
value in
millions

5.9
4.5

$ 713.7
$ 638.6

2012

Weighted-
average
exercise
price

$ 47.77
99.63
38.51
55.28
$ 59.86

Shares in
millions

31.7
4.9
(8.6)
(0.6)
27.4
17.1

2011

Weighted-
average
exercise
price

$ 42.47
75.97
37.46
55.00
$ 47.77

Shares in
millions

37.4
3.9
(9.0)
(0.6)
31.7
21.9

RSUs
RSUs generally vest 100% on the third anniversary of the grant and are payable in either shares of McDonald’s common stock or cash, at 
the Company’s discretion. Certain executives have been awarded RSUs that vest based on Company performance. The fair value of each 
RSU granted is equal to the market price of the Company’s stock at date of grant less the present value of expected dividends over the 
vesting period.

A summary of the Company’s RSU activity during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 is presented in the following 

table:

RSUs

Nonvested at beginning of year
Granted
Vested
Forfeited
Nonvested at end of year

2013
Weighted-
average
grant date
fair value

$ 68.23
83.98
56.93
82.44
$ 78.89

Shares in
millions

1.8
1.0
(0.7)
(0.1)
2.0

2012
Weighted-
average
grant date
fair value
$ 56.78
90.34
50.69
68.72
$ 68.23

Shares in
millions

2.1
0.5
(0.8)
0.0
1.8

2011
Weighted-
average
grant date
fair value
$ 51.17
67.96
49.88
50.16
$ 56.78

Shares in
millions

2.3
0.6
(0.7)
(0.1)
2.1

The total fair value of RSUs vested during 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $60.2 million, $76.4 million and $55.5 million, respectively. The tax 

benefit realized from RSUs vested during 2013 was $18.3 million. 

McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report    41
McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report   |   41

 
 
 
 
 
 
Quarterly Results (Unaudited)

In millions, except per share data

Revenues
Sales by Company-operated

restaurants

Revenues from franchised

restaurants
Total revenues

Company-operated margin
Franchised margin
Operating income
Net income
Earnings per common

share—basic

Earnings per common

share—diluted

Dividends declared per

common share
Weighted-average

common shares—basic

Weighted-average

common shares—diluted

Market price per common

share:

High
Low
Close

Quarters ended
December 31
2012

2013

Quarters ended
September 30  
2012  

2013

Quarters ended
June 30
2012

2013

Quarters ended
March 31
2012

2013

$ 4,744.3

$ 4,658.4

$ 4,923.1    $ 4,838.4   

$ 4,761.4

$ 4,673.5

$ 4,445.4

$4,432.2

2,348.9
7,093.2
815.6
1,927.2
2,200.4
$ 1,397.0

2,293.7
6,952.1
827.3
1,901.0
2,197.8
$ 1,396.1

$

$

1.41

1.40

$

$

1.39

1.38

2,400.3   
7,323.4   
918.7   
1,991.9   
2,416.7   

2,314.0   
7,152.4   
924.0   
1,930.6   
2,287.2   
$ 1,522.2    $ 1,455.0   

$

$

$

1.53    $

1.45   

1.52    $

1.43   

1.58

(1) $

1.47 (2)

2,322.4
7,083.8
841.9
1,923.3
2,197.7
$ 1,396.5

2,242.4
6,915.9
849.7
1,866.2
2,155.0
$ 1,347.0

$

$

$

1.39

1.38

0.77

$

$

$

1.33

1.32

0.70

2,159.9
6,605.3
719.4
1,764.7
1,949.5
$ 1,270.2

2,114.4
6,546.6
777.8
1,739.7
1,964.6
$1,266.7

$

$

$

1.27

1.26

0.77

$

$

$

1.24

1.23

0.70

992.5

1,002.4

997.3   

1,006.1   

1,001.4

1,013.8

1,002.7

1,018.2

999.3

1,010.7

1,004.2   

1,015.4   

1,008.7

1,023.9

1,010.8

1,030.0

$ 99.27
93.14
97.03

$ 94.16
83.31
88.21

$ 101.81    $ 94.00   
86.15   
91.75   

94.01   
96.21   

$ 103.70
95.16
99.00

$ 99.50
85.92
88.53

$ 99.78
89.25
99.69

$ 102.22
95.13
98.10

(1) 

Includes a $0.77 per share dividend declared and paid in third quarter and a $0.81 per share dividend declared in third quarter and paid in fourth quarter.

(2) 

Includes a $0.70 per share dividend declared and paid in third quarter and a $0.77 per share dividend declared in third quarter and paid in fourth quarter.

42    McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report
42   |   McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report

 
 
 
Management’s Assessment of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The financial statements were prepared by management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity and for establishing and 
maintaining adequate internal controls over financial reporting.

The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial 
reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The 
Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

I. 

pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the 
assets of the Company;

II.  provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in 

accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made 
only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and

III.  provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the 

Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

There are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any internal control, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or 
overriding of controls. Accordingly, even effective internal controls can provide only reasonable assurances with respect to financial 
statement preparation. Further, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of internal controls may vary over time.

Management assessed the design and effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. In 
making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway 
Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (1992 Framework).

Based on management’s assessment using those criteria, as of December 31, 2013, management believes that the Company’s internal 
control over financial reporting is effective.

Ernst & Young, LLP, independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the financial statements of the Company for the fiscal years 
ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 and the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013. Their 
reports are presented on the following pages. The independent registered public accountants and internal auditors advise management of 
the results of their audits, and make recommendations to improve the system of internal controls. Management evaluates the audit 
recommendations and takes appropriate action.

McDONALD’S CORPORATION

February 24, 2014

McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report    43

McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report   |   43

 
 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of McDonald’s Corporation

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of McDonald’s Corporation as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the 
related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the 
period ended December 31, 2013. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to 
express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those 
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of 
material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial 
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as 
evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of 
McDonald’s Corporation at December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the 
three years in the period ended December 31, 2013, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), McDonald’s 
Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated 
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 framework) and our report dated 
February 24, 2014, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 24, 2014

44    McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report

44   |   McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Board of Directors and Shareholders of McDonald’s Corporation

We have audited McDonald's Corporation's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013 based on criteria established in 
Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (1992 
framework) (the COSO criteria). McDonald’s Corporation’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over 
financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying 
report on Management’s Assessment of Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the 
Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those 
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial 
reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, 
assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based 
on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit 
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of 
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting 
principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of 
records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide 
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with 
generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with 
authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection 
of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any 
evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, 
or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, McDonald’s Corporation maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of 
December 31, 2013, based on the COSO criteria.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the 
consolidated financial statements of McDonald’s Corporation as of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and for each of the three years in the 
period ended December 31, 2013, and our report dated February 24, 2014, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Chicago, Illinois
February 24, 2014

McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report    45

McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report   |   45

 
ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements With
Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure

None.

ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures

DISCLOSURE CONTROLS
An evaluation was conducted under the supervision and with the 
participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief 
Executive Officer ("CEO") and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"), of 
the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s 
disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2013. 
Based on that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the 
Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as 
of such date to ensure that information required to be disclosed in 
the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is 
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time 
periods specified in SEC rules and forms.

INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
The Company’s management, including the CEO and CFO, 
confirm that there was no change in the Company’s internal 
control over financial reporting during the quarter ended 
December 31, 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably 
likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over 
financial reporting.

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT
Management’s Report and the Report of Independent Registered 
Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial 
Reporting are set forth in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.

ITEM 9B. Other Information

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. Directors, Executive Officers and
Corporate Governance

Information regarding (i) directors and the Company’s Code of 
Conduct for the Board of Directors and (ii) its Standards of 
Business Conduct, which applies to all officers and employees, is 
incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive 
proxy statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days after 
December 31, 2013. We will post any amendments to or any 
waivers for directors and executive officers from provisions of the 
above-referenced documents on the Company’s website at 
www.governance.mcdonalds.com.

Information regarding all of the Company’s executive officers 

is included in Part I, page 7 of this Form 10-K.

ITEM 11. Executive Compensation

Incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive 
proxy statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days after 
December 31, 2013.

ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Shareholder
Matters

The following table summarizes information about the Company’s equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2013. All outstanding 
awards relate to the Company’s common stock. Shares issued under all of the following plans may be from the Company’s treasury, newly 
issued or both.

Equity compensation plan information

Plan category

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

Total

Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in column (a))

(a)
26,920,043 (1) $
197,372 (2)
27,117,415    $

(b)

70.14

35.15
69.88

(c)

46,006,762

46,006,762

(1) 

Includes 21,144,095 stock options and 1,072,450 restricted stock units granted under the McDonald’s Corporation 2001 Omnibus Stock Ownership Plan and 
3,744,100 stock options and 959,398 restricted stock units granted under the McDonald's Corporation 2012 Omnibus Stock Ownership Plan.

(2) 

Includes 197,372 stock options granted under the 1992 Stock Ownership Plan.

Additional matters incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive proxy statement, which will be filed no later than 

120 days after December 31, 2013.

46    McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report
46   |   McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report

 
ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related
Transactions, and Director Independence

ITEM 14. Principal Accountant Fees and
Services

Incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive 
proxy statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days after 
December 31, 2013.

Incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive 
proxy statement, which will be filed no later than 120 days after 
December 31, 2013.

PART IV

ITEM 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

a.

(1) All financial statements

Consolidated financial statements filed as part of this report are listed under Part II, Item 8, pages 26 through 41 of this Form 10-K.

(2) Financial statement schedules

No schedules are required because either the required information is not present or is not present in amounts sufficient to require
submission of the schedule, or because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements or the notes
thereto.

b.

Exhibits

The exhibits listed in the accompanying index are filed as part of this report.

McDonald’s Corporation Exhibit Index (Item 15)

Exhibit Number

Description

(3)

(a) Restated Certificate of Incorporation, effective as of June 14, 2012, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q,

for the quarter ended June 30, 2012.

(b) By-Laws, as amended and restated with effect as of July 19, 2012, incorporated herein by reference from Form 8-K,

filed July 20, 2012.

(4)

Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including Indentures:*

(a) Senior Debt Securities Indenture, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit (4)(a) of Form S-3 Registration

Statement (File No. 333-14141), filed October 15, 1996.

(i)

(ii)

(iii)

(iv)

6 3/8% Debentures due 2028. Supplemental Indenture No. 1, dated January 8, 1998, incorporated herein by
reference from Exhibit (4)(a) of Form 8-K, filed January 13, 1998.

Medium-Term Notes, Series F, Due from 1 Year to 60 Years from Date of Issue. Supplemental Indenture No.
4, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit (4)(c) of Form S-3 Registration Statement (File No.
333-59145), filed July 15, 1998.

Medium-Term Notes, Series I, Due from 1 Year to 60 Years from Date of Issue. Supplemental Indenture No. 8,
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit (4)(c) of Form S-3 Registration Statement (File No.
333-139431), filed December 15, 2006.

Medium-Term Notes, Due from One Year to 60 Years from Date of Issue. Supplemental Indenture No. 9,
incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit (4)(c) of Form S-3 Registration Statement (File No.
333-162182), filed September 28, 2009.

(b) Subordinated Debt Securities Indenture, incorporated herein by reference from Exhibit (4)(b) of Form S-3 Registration

Statement (File No. 333-14141), filed October 15, 1996.

(10)

Material Contracts

(a) Directors’ Deferred Compensation Plan, effective as of January 1, 2008, incorporated herein by reference from

Form 8-K, filed December 4, 2007.**

(b) McDonald’s Excess Benefit and Deferred Bonus Plan, effective January 1, 2011, as amended and restated
March 22, 2010, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended March 31, 2010.**

(c) McDonald’s Corporation Supplemental Profit Sharing and Savings Plan, effective as of September 1, 2001,

incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2001.**

(i)

(ii)

First Amendment to the McDonald’s Corporation Supplemental Profit Sharing and Savings Plan, effective as
of January 1, 2002, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31,
2002.**

Second Amendment to the McDonald’s Corporation Supplemental Profit Sharing and Savings Plan, effective
January 1, 2005, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2004.**

(d) 1992 Stock Ownership Incentive Plan, as amended and restated January 1, 2001, incorporated herein by reference

from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended March 31, 2001.**

McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report    47
McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report   |   47

 
 
(i)

First Amendment to McDonald’s Corporation 1992 Stock Ownership Incentive Plan, as amended and restated,
effective as of February 14, 2007, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended
March 31, 2007.**

(e) McDonald’s Corporation Executive Retention Replacement Plan, effective as of December 31, 2007 (as amended
and restated on December 31, 2008), incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-K, for the year ended
December 31, 2008.**

(f) McDonald’s Corporation Amended and Restated 2001 Omnibus Stock Ownership Plan, effective July 1, 2008,

incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.**

(i)

(ii)

First amendment to the McDonald’s Corporation Amended and Restated 2001 Omnibus Stock Ownership
Plan, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2008.**

Second Amendment to the McDonald’s Corporation Amended and Restated 2001 Omnibus Stock Ownership
Plan as amended, effective February 9, 2011, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-K, for the year
ended December 31, 2010.**

(g) McDonald's Corporation 2012 Omnibus Stock Ownership Plan, effective June 1, 2012, incorporated herein by

reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended September 30, 2012.**

(h) McDonald’s Corporation 2009 Cash Incentive Plan, effective as of May 27, 2009, incorporated herein by reference

from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 2009.**

(i) McDonald's Corporation Target Incentive Plan, effective January 1, 2013, incorporated herein by reference from Form

10-Q, for the quarter ended March 31, 2013.**

(j) McDonald's Corporation Cash Performance Unit Plan, effective February 13, 2013, incorporated herein by reference

from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended March 31, 2013.**

(k) Form of Executive Stock Option Grant Agreement in connection with the Amended and Restated 2001 Omnibus
Stock Ownership Plan, as amended, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-K, for the year ended
December 31, 2011.**

(l)

Form of Executive Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement in connection with the Amended and
Restated 2001 Omnibus Stock Ownership Plan, as amended, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-K, for
the year ended December 31, 2011.**

(m) Form of Executive Stock Option Award Agreement in connection with the 2012 Omnibus Stock Ownership Plan,

incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended March 31, 2013.**

(n) Form of Executive Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement in connection with the 2012 Omnibus
Stock Ownership Plan, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended March 31, 2013.**

(o) Form of Special CPUP Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement in connection with the 2012

Omnibus Stock Ownership Plan, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended March 31,
2013.**

(p) McDonald’s Corporation Severance Plan, as Amended and Restated, effective September 9, 2013, incorporated

herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended September 30, 2013. **

(q) Form of McDonald's Corporation Tier I Change of Control Employment Agreement, incorporated herein by reference

from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended September 30, 2008.**

(r) Amended Assignment Agreement between Timothy Fenton and the Company, dated January 2008, incorporated

herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended March 31, 2008.**

(i)

2009 Amendment to the Amended Assignment Agreement between Timothy Fenton and the Company,
effective as of January 1, 2009, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended
March 31, 2009.**

(s) Description of Restricted Stock Units granted to Andrew J. McKenna, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-

Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 2013.**

(t)

Terms of the Restricted Stock Units granted pursuant to the Company’s Amended and Restated 2001 Omnibus Stock
Ownership Plan, incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2010.**

(u) Executive Supplement describing the special terms of equity compensation awards granted to certain executive

officers, pursuant to the Company’s Amended and Restated 2001 Omnibus Stock Ownership Plan, as amended,
incorporated herein by reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended March 31, 2011.**

(v) Separation Agreement between Janice Fields and the Company, dated May 15, 2013, incorporated herein by

reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 2013.**

(w) Later Date Agreement between Janice Fields and the Company, dated May 15, 2013, incorporated herein by

reference from Form 10-Q, for the quarter ended June 30, 2013.**

(x) Assignment Agreement between Douglas Goare and the Company, effective January 1, 2012, filed herewith.**

(12)

(21)

(23)

(24)

Computation of Ratios.

Subsidiaries of the Registrant.

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.

Power of Attorney.

48    McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report
48   |   McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report

(31.1)

(31.2)

(32.1)

(32.2)

Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.

Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 by the Chief Executive Officer, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 by the Chief Executive Officer, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(101.INS)

XBRL Instance Document.

(101.SCH)

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

(101.CAL)

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

(101.DEF)

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

(101.LAB)

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

(101.PRE)

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

* Other instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term debt of the registrant, and all of its subsidiaries for which consolidated

financial statements are required to be filed and which are not required to be registered with the Commission, are not included herein
as the securities authorized under these instruments, individually, do not exceed 10% of the total assets of the registrant and its
subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. An agreement to furnish a copy of any such instruments to the Commission upon request has
been filed with the Commission.

** Denotes compensatory plan.

McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report    49
McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report   |   49

 
 
By

By

By

By

By

By

Signature, Title

/s/   Kevin M. Ozan
Kevin M. Ozan
Corporate Senior Vice President – Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/   Sheila A. Penrose
Sheila A. Penrose

Director

/s/   John W. Rogers, Jr.
John W. Rogers, Jr.

Director

/s/   Roger W. Stone
Roger W. Stone

Director

/s/   Donald Thompson
Donald Thompson
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/   Miles D. White
Miles D. White
Director

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the 
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly 
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the 
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

McDonald’s Corporation
(Registrant)

By

/s/   Peter J. Bensen
Peter J. Bensen
Corporate Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

February 24, 2014

Date

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act 
of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following 
persons on behalf of the registrant and in their capacities 
indicated below on the 24th day of February, 2014:

By

By

By

By

By

By

By

By

By

Signature, Title

/s/   Susan E. Arnold
Susan E. Arnold
Director

/s/   Peter J. Bensen
Peter J. Bensen
Corporate Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

/s/   Robert A. Eckert
Robert A. Eckert
Director

/s/   Enrique Hernandez, Jr.
Enrique Hernandez, Jr.
Director

/s/   Jeanne P. Jackson
Jeanne P. Jackson
Director

/s/   Richard H. Lenny
Richard H. Lenny

Director

/s/   Walter E. Massey
Walter E. Massey

Director

/s/   Andrew J. McKenna
Andrew J. McKenna

Chairman of the Board and Director

/s/   Cary D. McMillan
Cary D. McMillan

Director

50    McDonald's Corporation 2013 Annual Report
50   |   McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report

 
Stock Performance Graph

At least annually, we consider which companies comprise a 
readily identifiable investment peer group. McDonald’s is included 
in published restaurant indices; however, unlike most other 
companies included in these indices, which have no or limited 
international operations, McDonald’s does business in more 
than 100 countries and a substantial portion of our revenues 
and income is generated outside the U.S. In addition, because 
of our size, McDonald’s inclusion in those indices tends to skew 
the results. Therefore, we believe that such a comparison is  
not meaningful.

Our market capitalization, trading volume and importance in  
an industry that is vital to the U.S. economy have resulted in 
McDonald’s inclusion in the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJIA) 
since 1985. Like McDonald’s, many DJIA companies generate 
meaningful revenues and income outside the U.S. and some 

manage global brands. Thus, we believe that the use of the DJIA 
companies as the group for comparison purposes is appropriate.

The following performance graph shows McDonald’s cumulative 
total shareholder returns (i.e., price appreciation and reinvestment 
of dividends) relative to the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index 
(S&P 500 Index) and to the DJIA companies for the five-year 
period ended December 31, 2013. The graph assumes that the 
value of an investment in McDonald’s common stock, the S&P 
500 Index and the DJIA companies (including McDonald’s) was 
$100 at December 31, 2008. For the DJIA companies, returns 
are weighted for market capitalization as of the beginning of each 
period indicated. These returns may vary from those of the Dow 
Jones Industrial Average Index, which is not weighted by market 
capitalization, and may be composed of different companies 
during the period under consideration.

Comparison of Cumulative 
Five Year Total Return

$250

$200

$150

$100

$50

$0

Dec ’08

Dec ’09

Dec ’10

Dec ’11

Dec ’12

Dec ’13

McDonald’s Corporation

S&P 500 Index

Dow Jones Industrials

100

100

100

104

126

123

132

146

140

178

149

152

161

172

167

183

228

217

Source: Capital IQ, a Standard & Poor’s business

$250

McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report   |   51

$200

$150

$100

$50

$200

$150

$100

$50

$0

Comparison of Cumulative Five Year Total Return

$0

Comparison of Cumulative Five Year Total Return

Comparison of Cumulative Five Year Total Return

$250

Comparison of Cumulative Five Year Total Return

Dec ’08

Dec ’09

Dec ’10

Dec ’11

Dec ’12

Dec ’13

Dec ’08

Dec ’09

Dec ’10

Dec ’11

Dec ’12

Dec ’13

Dec ’08

Dec ’09

Dec ’10

Dec ’11

Dec ’12

Dec ’13

Dec ’08

Dec ’09

Dec ’10

Dec ’11

Dec ’12

Dec ’13

$250

$250

$200

$250

$200

$150

$200

$150

$100

$150

$100

$50

$100

$50

$0

$50

$0

$0

$250

$250

$200

$250

$200

$150

$200

$150

$100

$150

$100

$50

$100

$50

$0

$50

$0

$0

$250

$250

$200

$250

$200

$150

$200

$150

$100

$150

$100

$50

$100

$50

$0

$50

$0

$0

Executive Management & Business Unit Officers

Jose Armario* 
Corporate EVP — Global Supply Chain,  
Development and Franchising

J.C. Gonzalez-Mendez 
Corporate SVP — Global Corporate  
Social Responsibility, Sustainability and Philanthropy

Peter Bensen* 
Corporate EVP and Chief Financial Officer

David Hoffmann* 
President — McDonald’s APMEA

John Betts 
President — McDonald’s Canada

Kenneth Koziol* 
Corporate EVP — Chief Restaurant Officer

Bridget Coffing 
Corporate SVP — Corporate Relations and  
Chief Communications Officer

Edgardo Navarro 
Latin America SVP — President —  
McDonald’s Latin America

Stephen Easterbrook* 
Corporate EVP and Global Chief Brand Officer

Kevin Ozan* 
Corporate SVP — Controller

Timothy Fenton* 
Chief Operating Officer

Gloria Santona* 
Corporate EVP — General Counsel and Secretary

Richard Floersch* 
Corporate EVP and Chief Human Resources Officer

James Sappington 
Corporate SVP — Chief Information Officer

Douglas Goare* 
President — McDonald’s Europe

Jeffrey Stratton* 
President — McDonald’s USA

Donald Thompson* 
President and Chief Executive Officer

*Executive Officer

52   |   McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report

Board of Directors

Director

Susan E. Arnold 2, 3 
Operating Executive, Global Consumer & Retail Group 
The Carlyle Group

Robert A. Eckert 2, 4, 6 
Chairman Emeritus of the Board 
Mattel, Inc.

Enrique Hernandez, Jr.1, 4, 6 
President and Chief Executive Officer 
Inter-Con Security Systems, Inc.

Jeanne P. Jackson 5, 6 
President, Product and Merchandising 
NIKE, Inc.

Richard H. Lenny 2, 3, 5 
Operating Partner 
Friedman, Fleischer & Lowe, LLC

Walter E. Massey 1, 3 
President 
School of the Art Institute of Chicago

Andrew J. McKenna 4, 6 
Chairman of the Board 
McDonald’s Corporation

Chairman 
Schwarz Supply Source

Cary D. McMillan1, 5 
Chief Executive Officer 
True Partners Consulting LLC

Sheila A. Penrose 1, 3 
Non-executive Chairman 
Jones Lang LaSalle Incorporated

John W. Rogers, Jr. 2, 3, 5 
Founder, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 
Ariel Investments, LLC

Roger W. Stone1, 5, 6 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 
KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation

Donald Thompson 4 
President and Chief Executive Officer 
McDonald’s Corporation

Miles D. White 2, 6 
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 
Abbott Laboratories

1.  Audit Committee
2. Compensation Committee
3. Sustainability and Corporate Responsibility Committee
4. Executive Committee
5. Finance Committee
6. Governance Committee

McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report   |   53

Investor Information 

Common stock

Ticker symbol: MCD

Stock exchange listing: New York

The number of shareholders of record and beneficial 
owners of the Company’s common stock as of 
January 31, 2014, was estimated to be 1,824,000.

McDonald’s home office 
McDonald’s Corporation  
One McDonald’s Plaza  
Oak Brook, IL 60523 
1.630.623.3000

Annual meeting 
May 22, 2014 
8:00 a.m. Central Time  
McDonald’s Office Campus  
Oak Brook, IL 60523

McDonald’s online  
Investor information  
www.investor.mcdonalds.com

Corporate governance  
www.governance.mcdonalds.com

Corporate social responsibility  
www.crmcdonalds.com

General information  
www.aboutmcdonalds.com

Key phone numbers 
Shareholder Services 
1.630.623.7428

Shareholder account information 
Stock transfer agent, registrar  
and MCDirect Shares administrator

Computershare 
c/o McDonald’s Shareholder Services 
P.O. Box 43078 
Providence, RI 02940-3078

www.computershare.com/mcdonalds 
U.S. and Canada: 1.800.621.7825 
International: 1.312.360.5129 
TDD (hearing impaired): 1.312.588.4110

Trademarks 
All trademarks used herein are the property of their 
respective owners.

McDonald’s Annual Report on Form 10-K 
Shareholders may access a complete copy of the 
10-K online at www.investor.mcdonalds.com or  
www.sec.gov. Shareholders may also request a 
paper copy at no charge by calling 1-800-228-9623  
or writing to McDonald’s Corporation, Shareholder 
Services, Department 720, One McDonald’s Plaza, 
Oak Brook, Illinois 60523.

The information in this report is as of March 13, 2014  
unless otherwise indicated.

Reproduction of photography and/or text in whole or  
in part without permission is prohibited.

©2014 McDonald’s  
Printed in the U.S.A.  
MCD14- 4828 

Printing: R.R. Donnelley

MCDirect Shares (direct stock purchase plan) 
1.800.228.9623

U.S. customer comments/inquiries 
1.800.244.6227

The Annual Report is printed on paper certified to the 
standards of the Forest Stewardship Council™ and includes 
post-consumer fiber. The FSC ® trademark identifies 
products which contain fiber from well-managed forests 
certified in accordance with FSC standards.

Financial media 
1.630.623.3678

Franchising 
1.630.623.6196

54   |   McDonald’s Corporation  2013 Annual Report

   More than

 35,000
 restaurants  

   around the world

2013 Highlights

   We operate  
    restaurants in over

 100
 countries

McDonald’s Corporation   |   One McDonald’s Plaza, Oak Brook, IL 60523   |   aboutmcdonalds.com