MDC Partners Inc
Annual Report 2006

Plain-text annual report

“THE PLACE WHERE GREAT TALENT LIVES” 2006 ANNUAL REPORT Dear Fellow Shareholders: MDC Partners made substantial progress during 2006 in its mission to create a world-class Partner network of entrepreneurial firms. The marketing services business is a dynamic market to operate in, particularly as the Internet and other interactive/digital forms of communication become more widely adopted by advertisers, marketers and consumers alike. Innovation, creativity and autonomy are the necessary ingredients to effectively compete in this space. At MDC Partners we not only recognize the realities of those attributes, we have built a network of leading-edge Partners that we believe can effectively drive sales for their clients, not only in North America, but around the world. During fiscal year 2006, the MDC Partners network led the advertising and marketing services industry with 11% organic revenue growth. We are extremely pleased with this result as it speaks to the incredible core business we have built. Revenues increased to $423.7 million, compared to $363.4 million in fiscal year 2005. MDC’s share of EBITDA increased 40% to $36.0 million compared to $25.6 million last year. New business revenue wins for the year totaled $75 million. Clearly we are pleased with the financial results of fiscal year 2006 and we believe the stage is set for improving financial performance in the years to come. Our increasingly digital world challenges virtually all industries to confront new ways of doing business and selling product. Advertisers are now actively looking to diversify their media mix with the more highly targeted, more engaging, and more measurable results that the Internet offers. Our approach of supporting our Partner firms’ creativity and autonomy while providing human and financial resources to accelerate growth has resulted in a very successful year. We firmly believe that the new paradigm in marketing services will place a premium on innovation, creativity, agility and the courage to break new ground. This is what MDC Partners is all about: creating marketing solutions to help its clients compete more effectively. During the year we made several important strategic decisions that we believe will accelerate our ability to grow the business effectively: • We invested significantly in our customer relationship management business with the establishment of three new customer care centers. We believe that these investments represent accretive business opportunities that will deliver substantial returns to our shareholders. • We invested in the geographic expansion of several of our businesses both through the addition of new offices, as in the case with Crispin Porter Bogusky’s establishment of an office in Boulder, and through tuck-under acquisitions that expanded the footprint of our offerings like the acquisition of Hadrian’s Wall, Chicago, by Zig, one of our Toronto- based Partners. This acquisition provided Zig with a foothold in the U.S. market. • • Investment in talent was also a critical part of our success during 2006 with the addition of senior creative and managerial talent at the Zyman Group, Kirshenbaum Bond and Partners, ACLC, Bratskeir, Bruce Mau Design, Colle & McVoy, Fletcher Martin, Henderson Bas, and Vitro Robertson. In November of 2006 we completed the divestiture of our Secure Products division. With the sale of Secure Products, we are now a marketing services, advertising and strategic consulting “pure-play.” Looking ahead, we are focused on harvesting the rewards of these investments while increasing our focus on growth via investments in new Partners and capabilities. Our activity on this front has been focused in the areas of public relations, brand strategy, digital innovation, and other high value marketing consulting and communications areas. In addition, we continue to dedicate resources to capturing a portion of the burgeoning Hispanic advertising and marketing services segment in North America as well as developing clients in Mexico and other Latin American markets. Today, perhaps more than at any time I can remember, clients want to go where the talent is. Marketers want smart, talented people thinking about their businesses. More importantly, they want talented individuals and firms who have the ability to create actionable marketing strategies that produce results. MDC Partners is better positioned than any other network to produce those results, because MDC Partners is “the place where great talent lives.” As always, we value the confidence that you, our loyal shareholders, have in us. We thank you for your support and we reiterate our dedication to building a company that will be widely regarded as one of the leading-edge marketing organizations worldwide. We look forward to a very successful 2007. Best regards, Miles S. Nadal Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Comparison of 5 Years’ Cumulative Total Return among MDC Partners, the S&P 500 Index and Peer Group Set forth below is a line graph comparing the yearly percentage change in the company’s cumulative total shareholder return for the last five years to that of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Stock Index and a peer group of publicly held corporate communications and marketing holding companies. The peer group consists of The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc., Omnicom Group, Inc. and WPP Group plc. The graph below shows the value at the end of each year of each $100 invested in our common stock, the S&P 500 Index and the peer group. The graph assumes the reinvestment of dividends. Total shareholder return for the peer group is weighted according to market capitalization at the beginning of each annual period. MDC Partners Inc. Comparison of 5-Year Cumulative Total Return 400.00 350.00 300.00 250.00 200.00 150.00 100.00 50.00 0.00 MDC Partners S&P 500 Index Peer Group 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 MDC Partners S&P 500 Index Peer Group ___________________________________ 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 100 100 100 126 88 64 337 100 87 316 111 90 188 117 91 218 135 117 “EBITDA” is a non-GAAP measure that represents operating profit plus depreciation and amortization, stock- based compensation and impairment charges. A reconciliation of “EBITDA” to the US GAAP reported results of operations for the period ended December 31, 2006, has been provided by the Company in the tables included in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K on March 9, 2007. (This page has been left blank intentionally.) UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 _____________ FORM 10-K ______________________ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2006 Commission File Number: 001 13178 ___________ MDC Partners Inc. (Exact name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) ____________________ Canada (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) 98 0364441 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) 45 Hazelton Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5R 2E3 (416) 960 9000 (Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices) 950 Third Avenue, New York, NY, 10022 (646) 429 1809 (Name, Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including Area Code, of Agent for Service) Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of Each Class None Name of Each Exchange On Which Registered n/a Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Title of Each Class Class A Subordinate Voting Shares without par value Name of Each Exchange On Which Registered NASDAQ Toronto Stock Exchange Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. YES (cid:133) NO (cid:58) Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes (cid:133) NO (cid:58) Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES (cid:58) NO (cid:133) Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. (cid:133) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b 2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Large accelerated filer (cid:133) Accelerated filer (cid:58) The aggregate market value of the shares of all classes of voting and non-voting common stock of the registrant held by non- affiliates of the registrant on June 30, 2006 was approximately $179.0 million, computed upon the basis of the closing sales price of the common stock on that date. For purposes of this computation, shares held by directors (and shares held by entities in which they serve as officers), and officers of the registrant have been excluded. Non-accelerated (cid:133) As of March 1, 2007, there were 24,487,205 outstanding shares of Class A subordinate voting shares without par value, and 2,502 outstanding shares of Class B multiple voting shares without par value, of the registrant. (This page has been left blank intentionally.) MDC PARTNERS INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I Business Risk Factors Unresolved Staff Comments Properties Legal Proceedings Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders PART II Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters Selected Financial Data Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure Controls and Procedures Other Information PART III Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant Executive Compensation Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters Certain Relationships and Related Transactions Principal Accountant Fees and Services Exhibits and Financial Statements Schedules Signatures Page 2 8 10 10 11 11 12 13 15 38 39 88 88 90 91 92 92 93 93 95 96 Item 1. Item 1A. Item 1B. Item 2. Item 3. Item 4. Item 5. Item 6. Item 7. Item 7A. Item 8. Item 9. Item 9A. Item 9B. Item 10. Item 11. Item 12. Item 13. Item 14. Item 15. i References in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to “MDC Partners”, “MDC”, the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to MDC Partners Inc. and, unless the context otherwise requires or otherwise is expressly stated, its subsidiaries. All dollar amounts are stated in US dollars unless otherwise stated. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE The following sections of the Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held on June 1, 2007, are incorporated by reference in Parts I and III: “Election of Directors,” “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” “Compensation of Executive Officers,” “Report of the Compensation Committee of the Board,” “Outstanding Shares,” “Transactions with MDC Partners Inc.” and “Appointment of Independent Accountants”. AVAILABLE INFORMATION Information regarding the Company’s annual report on Forms 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to these reports, will be made available, free of charge, at the Company’s website at http://www.mdc-partners.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company electronically files such reports with or furnishes them to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Any document that the Company files with the SEC may also be read and copied at the SEC’s public reference room located at 100 F. Street, N.E., Washington, DC 20549. Please call the SEC at 1 800 SEC 0330 for further information on the public reference room. The Company’s filings are also available to the public from the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov. The Company’s Code of Conduct, WhistleBlower Policy, and each of the charters for the Audit Committee, Human Resources & Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, are available free of charge on the Company’s website at http://www.mdc-partners.com or by writing to MDC Partners Inc., 950 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10022, Attention: Investor Relations. ii FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This document contains forward-looking statements. The Company’s representatives may also make forward- looking statements orally from time to time. Statements in this document that are not historical facts, including statements about the Company’s beliefs and expectations, recent business and economic trends, potential acquisitions, estimates of amounts for deferred acquisition consideration and “put” option rights, constitute forward- looking statements. These statements are based on current plans, estimates and projections, and are subject to change based on a number of factors, including those outlined in this section. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update publicly any of them in light of new information or future events, if any. Forward-looking statements involve inherent risks and uncertainties. A number of important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Such risk factors include, but are not limited to, the following: • • • • • • • • risks associated with effects of national and regional economic conditions; the Company’s ability to attract new clients and retain existing clients; the financial success of the Company’s clients; the Company’s ability to remain in compliance with its debt agreements and the Company’s ability to finance its contingent payment obligations when due and payable, including but not limited to those relating to “put” option rights; the Company’s ability to retain and attract key employees; the successful completion and integration of acquisitions which complement and expand the Company’s business capabilities; foreign currency fluctuations; and risks arising from the Company’s historical option grant practices. The Company’s business strategy includes ongoing efforts to engage in material acquisitions of ownership interests in entities in the marketing communications services industry. The Company intends to finance these acquisitions by using available cash from operations and through incurrence of bridge or other debt financing, either of which may increase the Company’s leverage ratios, or by issuing equity, which may have a dilutive impact on existing shareholders proportionate ownership. At any given time, the Company may be engaged in a number of discussions that may result in one or more material acquisitions. These opportunities require confidentiality and may involve negotiations that require quick responses by the Company. Although there is uncertainty that any of these discussions will result in definitive agreements or the completion of any transactions, the announcement of any such transaction may lead to increased volatility in the trading price of the Company’s securities. Investors should carefully consider these risk factors and the additional risk factors outlined in more detail in this Annual Report on Form 10-K under the caption “Risk Factors” and in the Company’s other SEC filings. SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION The Company reports its financial results in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) of the United States of America (“US GAAP”). However, the Company has included certain non-US GAAP financial measures and ratios, which it believes, provide useful information to both management and readers of this report in measuring the financial performance and financial condition of the Company. These measures do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by US GAAP and, therefore, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other publicly traded companies, nor should they be construed as an alternative to other titled measures determined in accordance with US GAAP. Item 1. Business MDC PARTNERS INC. PART I BUSINESS MDC was formed by Certificate of Amalgamation effective December 19, 1986, pursuant to the Business Corporations Act (Ontario). Effective December 19, 1986, MDC amalgamated with Branbury Explorations Limited, and thereby became a public company operating under the name of MDC Corporation. On May 28, 1996, MDC changed its name to MDC Communications Corporation and, on May 29, 1999, it changed its name to MDC Corporation Inc. On July 31, 2003, MDC acquired the remaining 26% of Maxxcom Inc. (“Maxxcom”) that it did not already own, privatizing the now wholly-owned subsidiary and merging Maxxcom’s corporate functions with MDC’s existing corporate functions. On January 1, 2004, MDC changed its name to its current name, MDC Partners Inc., and on June 28, 2004, MDC was continued under Section 187 of the Canada Business Corporations Act. MDC’s registered and head office address is located at 45 Hazelton Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5R 2E3. MDC is a leading provider of marketing communications services to customers globally. MDC has operating units in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Jamaica and Mexico. MDC’s subsidiaries provide a comprehensive range of marketing communications and consulting services in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Jamaica and Mexico, including advertising, direct marketing, database and customer relationship management, sales promotion, corporate communications, market research, corporate identity, design and branding, interactive marketing, strategic entertainment and other related services. Part I – Business MDC’s strategy is to build, grow and acquire market-leading businesses that deliver innovative, value-added marketing communications services to their clients. MDC Partners’ strategy supports its vision of being a network of best in class marketing communications and consulting companies whose strategic, creative and innovative solutions challenge the status quo, attract the finest talent and achieve superior results for clients and stakeholders. MDC’s Partner firms support this vision through attracting the most innovative and creative talent and by being the most innovative at providing value-added services, expertise, and capabilities that help clients grow their brands and businesses while the Corporate Group ensures that MDC is the most Partner responsive marketing services network. The MDC model is driven by three key mandates: Perpetual Partnership. The perpetual partnership creates ongoing alignment of interest and drives performance. The perpetual partnership model functions by (1) identifying the ‘right’ Partners; (2) creating the ‘right’ Partnership; (3) providing access to more resources; and (4) delivering financial results. Entrepreneurialism. Entrepreneurial spirit is optimized by creating customized solutions to support and grow our businesses. Human and Financial Capital. The model balances accountability with financial flexibility to support growth. MDC believes that its model supports its mission to deliver shareholder value through profitable and sustainable growth. The Marketing Communications Businesses operates through “partner” companies within the following reportable segments: Strategic Marketing Services (“SMS”) The SMS segment consists of firms that offer a full integrated complement of marketing communication and consulting services, including advertising and media, direct marketing, public relations, corporate communications, market research, corporate identity and branding, interactive marketing and sales promotion to national and global 2 clients. The SMS segment is comprised of the following agencies: Allard Johnson; ACLC; Colle + McVoy; Crispin Porter + Bogusky; Fletcher Martin; kirshenbaum bond + partners; Mono Advertising,; VitroRobertson; Zig; and Zyman Group. Customer Relationship Management (“CRM”) The CRM segment, comprised of Accent Marketing Services, provides marketing services that interface directly with the consumer of a client’s product or service. These services include the design, development and implementation of a complete customer service and direct marketing initiative intended to acquire, retain and develop each client’s customer base. This is accomplished primarily through sophisticated database management and analytical services and through customer care services using eight domestic and two foreign-based customer contact facilities to regional, national and global clients. Specialized Communication Services (“SCS”) The SCS segment includes marketing services firms that are normally engaged to provide a single or a few specific marketing services to regional, national and global clients. These firms provide niche solutions by providing world class expertise in selected marketing services. The services they provide include advertising, sales promotion, direct marketing, media relations, design and branding, research, interactive and corporate communications. The SCS segment is comprised of the following agencies: Accumark Communications, Banjo; Bratskeir; Bruce Mau Design; Bryan Mills Group; Chinnici Direct; Computer Composition; Hello Design; henderson bas; Integrated Healthcare Communications; Ito Partners; Yamamoto Moss Mackenzie; Margeotes Fertitta Powell; Northstar Research Partners; Onbrand; Pro-Image; Source Marketing; TargetCom; and Veritas Communications. Equity Accounted Affiliates: The following are the Company’s affiliates that are accounted for under the equity method: Cliff Freeman and Partners and Fuse Project. These entities provide a range of advertising, marketing communication and design services. Ownership Information The following table includes certain information about MDC’s operating subsidiaries. The “Put and Call Options” information represents existing contractual rights. Owners of interests in certain Marketing Communications subsidiaries have the right in certain circumstances to require MDC to acquire additional ownership interests held by them. The owners’ ability to exercise any such “put” option right is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including conditions requiring notice in advance of exercise. In addition, these rights cannot be exercised prior to specified staggered exercise dates. The exercise of these rights at their earliest contractual date would result in obligations of MDC to fund the related amounts during the periods described in the accompanying notes. It is not determinable, at this time, if or when the owners of these rights will exercise all or a portion of these rights. The amount payable by MDC in the event such rights are exercised is dependent on defined valuation formulas and on future events, such as the average earnings of the relevant subsidiary through the date of exercise, the growth rate of the earnings of the relevant subsidiary during that period, and, in some cases, the currency exchange rate at the date of payment. See also “Management’s Discussion and Analysis—Off-Balance Sheet Commitments—Put Rights of Subsidiaries’ Minority Shareholders” for further discussion. Put options represent puts of ownership interests by other interest holders to MDC with reciprocal call rights held by MDC for the same ownership interests with similar terms. The percentages shown represent the potential ownership interest MDC could achieve in each company assuming that the remaining equity holder(s) were to fully exercise their put option rights at the earliest opportunity. 3 MDC PARTNERS INC. SCHEDULE OF CURRENT AND POTENTIAL OWNERSHIP Company Consolidated: Strategic Marketing Services ACLC Inc Allard Johnson Communications Inc. Colle & McVoy, Inc. Crispin Porter & Bogusky, LLC Fletcher Martin, LLC kirshenbaum bond & partners, LLC Mono Advertising, LLC Vitro Robertson, LLC Zig Inc. Zyman Group, LLC. Customer Relationship Management Accent Marketing Services, LLC Specialized Communication Services Accumark Communications Inc. Banjo Strategic Entertainment, LLC Bratskeir & Company, Inc. Bruce Mau Design Inc. Bryan Mills Group Ltd. Chinnici Direct, Inc. Computer Composition of Canada Inc. Hello Design, LLC henderson bas partnership Integrated Healthcare Communications, Inc. Ito Partners LLC Margeotes Fertitta Powell, LLC Northstar Research Partners Inc. Onbrand Pro−Image Corporation Source Marketing, LLC TargetCom, LLC Veritas Communications Inc. Yamamoto Moss Mackenzie (formerly Mackenzie Marketing, Inc.) Equity Accounted: Cliff Freeman and Partners, LLC Fuse Project, LLC. % Owned at 12/31/06 Year Acquired PUT/CALL OPTIONS 2007 Thereafter (See Notes) 100.0% 60.2% 100.0% 49.0% 85.0% 60.0% 49.9% 68.0% 50.1% 62.1% 69.1% 1992 — 1992 1999 — 2001 60.0% 1999 100.0% 2004 2004 2004 2004 2005 — — — — — Note 1 Note 2 Note 3 Note 4 Note 5 Note 6 93.7% 1999 99.5% Note 7 55.0% 75.0% 100.0% 50.1% 71.2% 100.0% 100.0% 51.0% 65.0% 80.0% 60.0% 95.0% 70.1% 85.0% 100.0% 80.0% 100.0% 58.8% — — — — — — — 1993 2004 2000 2004 1989 100.0% 2000 1988 2004 2004 100.0% 1997 2006 1998 1998 100.0% 1992 1994 1998 2000 1993 — — — — — — — — Note 8 Note 9 Note 10 Note 11 100.0% 2000 — 19.9% 20.0% 2004 2005 — — Note 12 Notes 1. MDC has the right to increase its ownership in Crispin Porter & Bogusky, LLC (“CPB”) through acquisition of an incremental interest, up to 60% in 2007, up to 77% in 2008, up to 94% in 2010 and up to 100% in 2012. The other interest holders have the right to put to MDC an incremental interest up to 60% in 2007, up to 77% in 2008, up to 94% in 2010 and up to 100% in 2012. 4 2. MDC has the right to increase its ownership in kirshenbaum bond & partners, LLC through acquisition of an incremental interest, and the other interest holders have the right to put to MDC the same incremental interest, up to 100% of this entity in 2008. 3. MDC has the right to increase its ownership in Mono Advertising, LLC through acquisition of an incremental interest, and the other interest holders have the right to put to MDC the same incremental interest, up to 54% of this entity in 2010, up to 59% in 2011, up to 64% in 2012, up to 69% in 2013 and up to 74.0% in 2014. 4. MDC has the right to increase its ownership in Vitro Robertson, LLC through acquisition of an incremental interest, and the other interest holders have the right to put to MDC the same incremental interest, up to 100% of this entity in 2011. 5. MDC has the right to increase its ownership in Zig Inc. through acquisition of an incremental interest, and the other interest holders have the right to put to MDC the same incremental interest, up to 76.4% in 2009 and up to 80% in 2010. 6. MDC has the right to increase its ownership in Zyman Group, LLC through acquisition of an incremental interest, and the other interest holders have the right to put to MDC the same incremental interest, up to 67.6% in 2008. MDC also has the right to further increase its ownership interest in Zyman Group through acquisition of an incremental interest up to 93.2% in 2013. 7. MDC has the right to increase its ownership in Accent Marketing Services LLC through acquisition of an incremental interest, and the other interest holders have the right to put to MDC the same incremental interest, up to 99.5% in 2007. 8. MDC, has the right to increase its ownership in Accumark Communications Inc. through acquisition of an incremental interest, and the other interest holders have the right to put to MDC the same incremental interest up to 61.7% in 2010, up to 68.3% in 2011 and up to 75.0% in 2012. 9. MDC, has the right to increase its ownership in Ito Partners LLC through acquisition of an incremental interest, and the other interest holder has the right to put to MDC the same incremental interest up to 80% of this entity in 2011. 10. MDC has the right to increase its ownership in Margeotes Fertitta Powell LLC through acquisition of an incremental interest, and the interest holder has the right to put to MDC the same incremental interest, up to 100% in 2010. 11. MDC has the right to increase its ownership in Source Marketing, LLC through acquisition of an incremental interest, and the interest has the right to put to MDC the same incremental interest up to 86.7% in 2008, 93.4% in 2010 and 100% in 2012. 12. CPB has a 20% interest in Fuse Project, LLC and MDC owns 49% of CPB. Highlights Since January 1, 2006 Since January 1, 2006, the following significant developments in MDC’s business have occurred. February 7, 2006 MDC purchased 12.33% of the membership interests of Source Marketing LLC February 15, 2006 (“Source”) following the minority holder’s exercise of a put option in October 2005. The purchase price of $2.3 million consisted of cash of $1.8 million and the delivery of 1,063,516 shares of LifeMed valued at $0.5 million. Following this transaction, the Company’s ownership in LifeMed was 13.2%. Source issued 15% of its currently outstanding membership interests to certain members of management. The purchase price for these membership interests was equal to $1.5 million, which consisted of cash of $0.4 million and recourse notes in a principal amount equal to $1.1 million, An amended and restated LLC agreement was entered into with these new shareholders. The agreement also permits these shareholders to put to the Company these membership interests from December 2008-2012. As a result of the above transactions, the Company owned 85% of Source. 5 July 1, 2006 MDC and Mono Advertising, LLC amended its operating agreement to eliminate certain limitations that MDC had on its ability to exercise control of Mono Advertising, LLC. Effective July 1, 2006 MDC has consolidated Mono Advertising, LLC which had previously been accounted for under the equity method. November 14, 2006 November 17, 2006 MDC completed the sale of the stock of the Secure Products International Group (“SPI”) to an affiliate of H.I.G. Capital in exchange for consideration equal to approximately $27 million. Consideration was received in the form of cash of $20 million and additional $1 million annual payments over the next five years. In addition, MDC received a 7.5% equity interest in the newly formed entity acquiring the SPI. The net cash proceeds where used to repay borrowings under the Company’s credit facility. MDC, through its subsidiary Zig Inc. (“Zig”) purchased a controlling interest in Hadrian’s Wall Advertising, LLC for $0.6 million. Hadrian’s Wall Advertising, LLC is a creative advertising firm that was acquired to facilitate the expansion of Zig’s business into the US market. In addition, MDC purchased an additional 0.2% of Zig for nominal cash and 30,000 MDC Stock Appreciation Rights, valued at $0.1 million. Effective November 17, 2006, MDC has consolidated Zig, which had previously been accounted for under the equity method. November 17, 2006 MDC purchased an additional 20% interest in Northstar Research Partners Inc. for $3.4 million. Northstar Research Partners Inc. is MDC’s primary research agency with goals of expanding further into the US and internationally. December 15, 2006 MDC and Accumark Communications Inc. amended its operating agreement to eliminate certain minority rights. Effective December 15, 2006, MDC has consolidated Accumark Communications Inc. which had previously been accounted for under the equity method. February 2, 2007 MDC, through its subsidiary Bryan Mills Group Ltd. (“Bryan Mills”), acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Iradesso Communications Corp., a Canadian financial communications firm. The purchase price for this transaction included a cash payment equal to approximately $0.3 million and the issuance of shares in Bryan Mills representing 11.85% of the ownership in Bryan Mills valued at approximately $0.7 million. Financial Information Relating to Business Segments and Geographic Regions For financial information relating to (a) the Company’s Marketing Communications Businesses, and (b) the geographic regions the businesses operate within, refer to Note 16 (Segmented Information) of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report and to “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis” for further discussion. Competition In the competitive, highly fragmented marketing and communications industry, the Company’s operating companies compete for business with the operating subsidiaries of large global holding companies such as Omnicom Group Inc., Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc., WPP Group plc, Publicis Group SA and Havas Advertising. These global holding companies generally have greater resources than those available to MDC and its subsidiaries, and such resources may enable them to aggressively compete with the Company’s Marketing Communications Businesses. Each of the operating companies also faces competition from numerous independent agencies that operate in multiple markets. MDC’s operating companies must compete with these other companies to maintain existing client relationships and to obtain new clients and assignments. MDC’s operating companies compete at this level by providing clients with marketing ideas and strategies that are focused on increasing clients’ revenues and profits. These existing and potential clients include multinational corporations and national companies with mid-to- large sized marketing budgets. MDC also benefits from cooperation among the operating companies through 6 referrals and the sharing of both services and expertise, which enables MDC to service clients’ varied marketing needs. A company’s ability to compete for new clients is affected in some instances by the policy, which many advertisers and marketers impose, of not permitting their agencies to represent competitive accounts in the same market. In the vast majority of cases, however, MDC’s consistent maintenance of separate, independent operating companies has enabled MDC to represent competing clients across its network. Industry Trends Historically, advertising has been the primary service provided by the marketing communications industry. However, as clients aim to establish one-to-one relationships with customers, and more accurately measure the effectiveness of their marketing expenditures, specialized communications services are consuming a growing portion of marketing dollars. This is increasing the demand for a broader range of non-advertising marketing communications services (i.e., direct marketing, sales promotion, interactive, etc). As well, there is an increasing need for consistent brand communication in response to increased competition from globalization and deregulation. Clients The Company serves clients in virtually every industry and in many cases the same clients in various locations. Representation of a client rarely means that MDC handles marketing communications for all brands or product lines of the client in every geographical location. MDC’s agencies have written contracts with many of their clients. As is customary in the industry, these contracts provide for termination by either party on relatively short notice. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis—Executive Overview” for a further discussion of MDC’s arrangements with its clients. The Company’s significant clients in 2006 included Sprint, Volkswagen of America and Burger King. During 2006, Sprint accounted for approximately 15.5% of revenues. No client accounted for 10% or more of revenues during 2005. In 2004, Sprint, via a vendor relationship with IBM, represented approximately 13% of MDC’s revenues for the year. In addition, MDC’s ten largest clients (measured by revenue generated) accounted for 39%, 35% and 34% of 2006, 2005 and 2004 revenues, respectively. Employees As of December 31, 2006, MDC and its subsidiaries had the following number of employees within its reportable segments: Segment Total Strategic Marketing Services Customer Relationship Management Specialized Communication Services Corporate Total 1,438 2,982 537 37 4,994 See Management’s Discussion and Analysis for a discussion of the effect of cost of services sold on MDC’s historical results of operations. Because of the personal service character of the Marketing Communications Businesses, the quality of personnel is of crucial importance to MDC’s continuing success. MDC considers its relations with employees to be satisfactory. Effect of Environmental Laws MDC believes it is substantially in compliance with all regulations concerning the discharge of materials into the environment, and such regulations have not had a material effect on the capital expenditures or operations of MDC. 7 Item 1A. Risk Factors The following factors could adversely affect the Company’s revenues, results of operations or financial condition. See also “Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Disclosure.” MDC competes for clients in highly competitive industries. The Company operates in a highly competitive environment in an industry characterized by numerous firms of varying sizes, with no single firm or group of firms having a dominant position in the marketplace. Competitive factors include creative reputation, management, personal relationships, quality and reliability of service and expertise in particular niche areas of the marketplace. In addition, because a firm’s principal asset is its people, barriers to entry are minimal, and relatively small firms are, on occasion, able to take all or some portion of a client’s business from a larger competitor. While many of MDC’s client relationships are long-standing, companies put their advertising and marketing services businesses up for competitive review from time to time, including at times when clients enter into strategic transactions. To the extent that the Company fails to maintain existing clients or attract new clients, MDC’s business, financial condition and operating results may be affected in a materially adverse manner. The loss of lines of credit could adversely affect MDC’s liquidity and our ability to implement MDC’s acquisition strategy and fund any put options if exercised. As of December 31, 2006, MDC had approximately $48.9 million outstanding under its revolving credit facility in the form of borrowings and letters of credit (the “Credit Facility”). The Credit Facility is scheduled to expire, by its terms, on September 22, 2007. MDC uses amounts available under the Credit Facility, together with cash flow from operations, to fund its working capital needs, to fund the exercise of put option obligations and to fund our strategy of making selective acquisitions of ownership interests in entities in the marketing communications services industry. MDC amended its Credit Facility five times in 2005, and another four times in 2006. Certain of these amendments to the Credit Facility were necessary in order to avoid an event of default under the Credit Facility and to permit the Company to continue to borrow under the Credit Facility. See “Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation—Liquidity and Capital Resources,” for a more detailed discussion of these amendments to the Credit Facility. The Company is currently in compliance with all of the terms and conditions of its amended Credit Facility, and management believes that the Company will be in compliance with covenants over the next twelve months. If, however, events were to occur which result in MDC losing all or a substantial portion of its lines of credit under the Credit Facility, MDC would be required to seek other sources of liquidity. In addition, if MDC were unable to replace this source of liquidity, or if MDC were unable to extend the term or replace the Credit Facility prior to September 22, 2007, then MDC’s ability to fund its working capital needs and any contingent obligations with respect to put options would be materially adversely affected. MDC has identified, and corrected, improper practices relating to its historical option grant practices, and the results of MDC’s internal review may give rise to uncertainties and liabilities. As disclosed in the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed on December 22, 2006, a Special Committee of disinterested and independent directors, with the assistance of independent legal counsel, completed an internal review of the Company’s historical option grant practice. In connection with this review, the Company has corrected all historical option grants for which the exercise price did not correspond to the market price on the date of the approval of the grant so that the exercise price is now the same as the market price on the date of the approval. These adjustments were made pursuant to the self-correcting provisions in the Company’s option plan. As previously disclosed, the Company does not intend nor expect to restate any financial statements for prior periods, and management does not expect any material impact on the Company’s financial statements as a result of the Special Committee’s review and conclusions. The Company has incurred significant expenses for outside legal counsel services as part of its review. While the Special Committee believes it has made appropriate judgments in correcting improper stock option grants and implementing its recommendations, it is possible that one or more regulatory agencies may determine to conduct 8 their own formal investigation of the Company’s historical option grant process. Accordingly, there is a risk that the Company may have to take other actions not currently contemplated. MDC may not realize the benefits it expects from past acquisitions or acquisitions MDC may make in the future. MDC’s business strategy includes ongoing efforts to engage in material acquisitions of ownership interests in entities in the marketing communications services industry. MDC intends to finance these acquisitions by using available cash from operations and through incurrence of debt or bridge financing, either of which may increase its leverage ratios, or by issuing equity, which may have a dilutive impact on its existing shareholders. At any given time MDC may be engaged in a number of discussions that may result in one or more material acquisitions. These opportunities require confidentiality and may involve negotiations that require quick responses by MDC. Although there is uncertainty that any of these discussions will result in definitive agreements or the completion of any transactions, the announcement of any such transaction may lead to increased volatility in the trading price of its securities. The success of acquisitions or strategic investments depends on the effective integration of newly acquired businesses into MDC’s current operations. Such integration is subject to risks and uncertainties, including realization of anticipated synergies and cost savings, the ability to retain and attract personnel and clients, the diversion of management’s attention from other business concerns, and undisclosed or potential legal liabilities of the acquired company. MDC may not realize the strategic and financial benefits that it expects from any of its past acquisitions, or any future acquisitions. MDC’s business could be adversely affected if it loses key clients. MDC’s strategy has been to acquire ownership stakes in diverse marketing communications businesses to minimize the effects that might arise from the loss of any one client or executive. The loss of one or more clients could materially affect the results of the individual operating companies and the Company as a whole. Management succession at our operating units is very important to the ongoing results of the Company because, as in any service business, the success of a particular agency is dependent upon the leadership of key executives and management personnel. If key executives were to leave our operating units, the relationships that MDC has with its clients could be adversely affected. MDC’s ability to generate new business from new and existing clients may be limited. To increase its revenues, MDC needs to obtain additional clients or generate demand for additional services from existing clients. MDC’s ability to generate initial demand for its services from new clients and additional demand from existing clients is subject to such clients’ and potential clients’ requirements, pre-existing vendor relationships, financial condition, strategic plans and internal resources, as well as the quality of MDC’s employees, services and reputation and the breadth of its services. To the extent MDC cannot generate new business from new and existing clients due to these limitations, it will limit MDC’s ability to grow its business and to increase its revenues. MDC’s revenues are susceptible to declines as a result of general adverse economic developments. The marketing communications services industry is cyclical and is subject to the negative effects of economic downturns. MDC’s advertising and marketing services subsidiaries and affiliates are also exposed to the risk of clients changing their business plans and/or reducing their marketing budgets. As a result, if the U.S. and Canadian economies weaken, our businesses, financial condition and operating results are likely to be adversely affected. MDC’s business could be adversely affected if it loses or fails to attract key employees. Employees, including creative, research, media, account and practice group specialists, and their skills and relationships with clients, are among MDC’s most important assets. An important aspect of MDC’s competitiveness is its ability to retain key employee and management personnel. Compensation for these key employees is an essential factor in attracting and retaining them, and MDC may not offer a level of compensation sufficient to attract and retain these key employees. If MDC fails to hire and retain a sufficient number of these key employees, it may not be able to compete effectively. 9 MDC is exposed to the risk of client media account defaults. The Company often incurs expenses on behalf of its clients in order to secure a variety of media time and space, in exchange for which it receives a fee. The difference between the gross cost of the media and the net revenue earned by us can be significant. While MDC takes precautions against default on payment for these services (such as advance billing of clients) and have historically had a very low incidence of default, MDC is still exposed to the risk of significant uncollectible receivables from our clients. MDC’s results of operations are subject to currency fluctuation risks. Although MDC’s financial results are reported in U.S. dollars, a portion of its revenues and operating costs are denominated in currencies other than the US dollar. As a result, fluctuations in the exchange rate between the U.S. dollar and other currencies, particularly the Canadian dollar, may affect MDC’s financial results and competitive position. MDC is subject to regulations that could restrict its activities or negatively impact its revenues. Advertising and marketing communications businesses are subject to government regulation, both domestic and foreign. There has been an increasing tendency in the United States on the part of advertisers to resort to litigation and self-regulatory bodies to challenge comparative advertising on the grounds that the advertising is false and deceptive. Moreover, there has recently been an expansion of specific rules, prohibitions, media restrictions, labeling disclosures and warning requirements with respect to advertising for certain products. Representatives within government bodies, both domestic and foreign, continue to initiate proposals to ban the advertising of specific products and to impose taxes on or deny deductions for advertising which, if successful, may have an adverse effect on advertising expenditures and consequently MDC’s revenues. MDC has recently eliminated material weaknesses in its internal control over financial reporting. MDC is required to review and assess its disclosure controls and procedures and its internal controls over financial reporting, pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. As disclosed more fully in Item 9A of this annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, management’s assessment has identified that all previously disclosed material weaknesses in disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting have been remediated. However, MDC cannot ensure that additional material weaknesses or deficiencies in its internal control over financial reporting will not be identified in the future. Deficiencies may adversely affect MDC’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data. Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments As of March 15, 2007, there is one unresolved comment of the Staff of the Division of Corporate Finance of the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the Company’s accounting policy for revenue recognition under the Proportional Performance model. (See Note 2 regarding “Revenue Recognition” in the notes to the Company’s consolidated financial statements herein). The Company believes that application of this accounting policy is appropriate and in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Item 2. Properties See the notes to the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report for a discussion of the Company’s lease commitments and the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis” for the impact of occupancy costs on the Company’s operating expenses. MDC maintains office space in many cities in the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Jamaica and Mexico. This space is primarily used for office and administrative purposes by MDC’s employees in performing professional services. This office space is in suitable and well-maintained condition for MDC’s current operations. All of MDC’s materially important office space is leased from third parties with varying expiration dates. Certain of these leases are subject to rent reviews or contain various escalation clauses and certain of our leases require our payment of various operating expenses, which may also be subject to escalation. In addition, leases related to MDC’s non-US businesses are denominated in other than US dollars and are therefore subject to changes in foreign exchange rates. 10 Item 3. Legal Proceedings MDC’s operating entities are involved in legal proceedings of various types. While any litigation contains an element of uncertainty, MDC has no reason to believe that the outcome of such proceedings or claims will have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of MDC. Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2006. 11 Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters Market Information and Holders of Class A Subordinate Voting Shares PART II The principal United States market on which the Company’s Class A subordinate voting shares are traded is the NASDAQ National Market (“NASDAQ”) (symbol: “MDCA”), and the principal market in Canada is The Toronto Stock Exchange (symbol: “MDZ.A”). As of March 1, 2007, the approximate number of holders of our Class A subordinate voting shares, including those whose shares are held in nominee name, was 2,800. Quarterly high and low sales prices per share of the Company’s Class A subordinate voting shares, as reported by the NASDAQ composite and The Toronto Stock Exchange, respectively, for each quarter in the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 are as follows: High Low Nasdaq National Market ($ per share) Quarter Ended March 31, 2005 June 30, 2005 September 30, 2005 December 31, 2005 March 31, 2006 June 30, 2006 September 30, 2006 December 31, 2006 11.89 9.30 7.45 6.80 5.35 6.06 7.75 6.80 6.79 10.37 10.05 7.60 9.50 9.60 9.00 8.06 The Toronto Stock Exchange (C $ per share) Quarter Ended March 31, 2005 June 30, 2005 September 30, 2005 December 31, 2005 March 31, 2006 June 30, 2006 September 30, 2006 December 31, 2006 13.91 10.25 9.00 12.75 8.20 10.85 6.27 8.75 7.32 10.04 8.68 10.63 7.55 10.00 7.65 9.01 As of March 1, 2007, the last reported sale price of the Class A subordinate voting shares was $7.51 on NASDAQ and C$8.87 on the Toronto Stock Exchange. Dividend Policy MDC has not declared nor paid any dividends on its Class A subordinate voting shares since its incorporation in 1986. In addition, MDC’s Credit Facility prohibits MDC from declaring and paying cash dividends. Accordingly, it is expected that no dividends will be paid by MDC on the Class A subordinate voting shares or the Class B shares in the foreseeable future. Any future payment of dividends will be determined by the board of directors of MDC Partners Inc. on the basis of MDC’s earnings, financial requirements and other relevant factors. Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans The following table sets forth information regarding securities issued under our equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2006. 12 Equity Compensation Plans: Approved by stockholders: Share options Stock appreciation rights Not approved by stockholders: Number of Securities to be Issued Upon Exercise of Outstanding Options and Rights (a) Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options and Rights (b) Number of Securities Remaining Available For Future Issuance (excluding Column (a)) (c) 1,733,081 $ $ 237,059(1) 8.57 7.91 1,061,000 1,398,158 None —————— (1) Based on December 31, 2006 closing Class A subordinate voting share price on the Toronto Stock Exchange of — — — C$8.50 ($7.40). On May 26, 2005, the Company’s shareholders’ approved the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan, which provides for the issuance of two million Class A subordinate voting shares. See also Note 14 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report. Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities; Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities None Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities: Shares- Class A subordinate voting shares For the twelve months ended December 31, 2006, the Company made no purchases of its Class A subordinate voting shares or its Class B shares. In 2004, the Company publicly announced a stock repurchase plan, which repurchase plan expired in June, 2005. Pursuant to its Credit Facility, the Company is currently restricted from repurchasing its shares. Transfer Agent and Registrar for Common Stock The transfer agent and registrar for the Company’s common stock is CIBC Mellon Trust Company. CIBC Mellon Trust Company operates a telephone information inquiry line that can be reached by dialing toll-free 1-800- 387-0825 or 416-643-5500. Correspondence may be addressed to: MDC Partners Inc. C/o CIBC Mellon Trust Company Corporate Trust Services P.O. Box 7010 Adelaide Street Postal Station Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M7 Item 6. Selected Financial Data The following selected financial data should be read in connection with Item 7 – “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and notes that are included in this annual report on Form 10-K. 13 2006 Years Ended December 31, 2004 (dollars in thousands, except per share data) 2003 2005 2002 OPERATING DATA Revenues Operating profit Income (loss) from continuing operations Stock-based compensation included in income from operations EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE Basic Continuing operations Diluted Continuing operations FINANCIAL POSITION Total assets Total debt Fixed charge coverage ratio $ 423,671 $ 363,362 $ 247,073 $ 210,086 $ 302,051 $ 27,593 $ 93,381 $ $ 13,286 $ (14,823) $ (9,083) $ 9,681 $ $ 31,872 4,659 6,572 $ 19,959 $ 8,361 $ 3,272 $ 8,388 $ 6,182 $ — $ $ (0.62) $ (0.39) $ 0.31 (0.62) $ (0.39) $ 0.29 $ $ 1.62 1.40 $ $ 5.52 3.69 $ 493,501 $ 95,454 1.31 $ 507,315 $ 123,149 2.16 $ 437,341 $ 53,538 2.78 $ 321,539 $ 150,142 3.09 $ 349,677 $ 179,694 6.31 Several significant factors that should be considered when comparing the annual results shown above are as follows: Year Ended December 31, 2006 On November 14, 2006, MDC sold its Secure Products International Products division, all periods have been restated to reflect these discontinued operations. See Note 11 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included herein. MDC incurred an impairment charge of $6.3 million relating to identified intangible assets and goodwill. For the first six months of 2006, the Company paid interest at the rate of 8.5% on its (C$45.0 million) Debentures. In accordance with the terms of the Debentures, the Company paid interest at the rate of 8.0% for the last six months of 2006. See below. Year Ended December 31, 2005 On June 28, 2005, MDC completed an issuance in Canada of convertible unsecured subordinated debentures amounting to $38.7 million as of December 31, 2005 (C$45.0 million) (the “Debentures”). The Debentures mature on June 30, 2010. The Debentures bear interest at an annual rate of 8.00% payable semi-annually, in arrears, on June 30 and December 31 of each year, commencing December 31, 2005. Effective January 1, 2006 until the date on which a registration statement for the resale of the Debentures is declared effective by the SEC, the Debentures will bear interest at an annual rate of 8.50%, the registration statement was declared effective during the second quarter of 2006. The Company’s interest rate was 8.5% until June 30, 2006, at which time the rate was reduced to 8.0%. On April 1, 2005, MDC, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, purchased 61.6% of the total outstanding membership units of Zyman Group, LLC for a purchase price equal to $52.4 million paid in cash, plus the issuance of 1,139,975 class A shares of MDC valued at approximately $11.2 million. On an annual basis, the Company receives a 20% priority return calculated based on its total investment in Zyman Group, LLC, which as of December 31, 2005 approximates a priority return of $12.7 million. Year Ended December 31, 2004 During 2004, MDC sold its remaining 20% interest in Custom Direct, Inc. (“CDI”) with a resulting reduction in long-term debt and a net gain of $15.0 million. See Note 15 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included herein. 14 MDC acquired interests in several marketing communication businesses, which contributed $56.1 million of revenue, $2.9 million of income from continuing operations and $120.6 million of assets. Effective September 22, 2004, MDC consolidated Crispin Porter + Bogusky, LLC (“CPB”) as a variable interest entity. Prior to that date, CPB had been accounted for on an equity basis since acquired by MDC in 2001. As a result of the change in accounting, from September 22, 2004, CPB contributed revenues of $13.3 million and increased MDC’s assets by approximately $80.0 million. Year Ended December 31, 2003 During 2003, MDC disposed of 80% of its interest in CDI and retired the remaining 10.5% senior subordinated notes. The divestitures and debt repayment resulted in a gain of $42.1 million. CDI contributed $48.5 million of revenue and $6.1 million of income from continuing operations in 2003. Effective January 1, 2003, MDC prospectively adopted fair value accounting for stock based awards as prescribed by SFAS No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” MDC also incurred impairment charges of $10.0 million and $8.1 million relating to goodwill and fixed assets, respectively. Year Ended December 31, 2002 During 2002, MDC sold its remaining interests in Davis + Henderson, Ashton Potter Packaging, AE McKenzie, House of Questa, and Spectron and retired $112.5 million of its 10.5% senior subordinated debentures. The divestitures, debt repayment and a financial derivative gain resulted in a gain of $113.4 million. The above divested operations contributed $51.4 million of revenue and $8.1 million of income from continuing operations in 2002. Effective January 1, 2002 MDC adopted Financial Accounting Statement 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangibles,” whereby goodwill and other intangible assets that have indefinite lives are no longer amortized but tested for impairment at least annually. MDC also incurred a $3.4 million write-down of fixed assets in 2002. Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Unless otherwise indicated, references to the “Company” mean MDC Partners Inc. and its subsidiaries, and references to a fiscal year means the Company’s year commencing on January 1 of that year and ending December 31 of that year (e.g., fiscal 2006 means the period beginning January 1, 2006, and ending December 31, 2006). The Company reports its financial results in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) of the United States of America (“US GAAP”). However, the Company has included certain non-US GAAP financial measures and ratios, which it believes provide useful information to both management and readers of this report in measuring the financial performance and financial condition of the Company. One such term is “organic revenue”, which means growth in revenues from sources other than acquisitions or foreign exchange impacts. These measures do not have a standardized meaning prescribed by US GAAP and, therefore, may not be comparable to similarly titled measures presented by other publicly traded companies, nor should they be construed as an alternative to other titled measures determined in accordance with US GAAP. Executive Summary The Company’s objective is to create shareholder value by building market-leading subsidiaries and affiliates that deliver innovative, value-added marketing communications and strategic consulting to their clients. Management believes that shareholder value is maximized with an operating philosophy of “Perpetual Partnership” with proven committed industry leaders in marketing communications. MDC manages the business by monitoring several financial and non-financial performance indicators. The key indicators that we review focus on the areas of revenues and operating expenses. Revenue growth is analyzed by reviewing the components and mix of the growth, including: growth by major geographic location; existing growth by major reportable segment (organic); growth from currency changes; and growth from acquisitions. 15 MDC conducts its businesses through the Marketing Communications Group. Within the Marketing Communications Group, there are three reportable operating segments: Strategic Marketing Services (“SMS”), Customer Relationship Management (“CRM”) and Specialized Communication Services (“SCS”). In addition, MDC has a “Corporate Group” which provides certain administrative, accounting, financial and legal functions. During the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company reclassified Margeotes Fertitta Powell, LLC (“MFP”) from the SMS segment to the SCS segment as MFP’s performance for the foreseeable future is not expected to be consistent with the other operating units of the SMS group. All prior periods have been recast to conform to the current year presentation. Marketing Communications Businesses Through its operating “partners”, MDC provides advertising, consulting and specialized communication services to clients throughout the United States, Canada, Mexico and Europe. The operating companies earn revenue from agency arrangements in the form of retainer fees or commissions; from short-term project arrangements in the form of fixed fees or per diem fees for services; and from incentives or bonuses. Additional information about revenue recognition appears in Note 2 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements. MDC measures operating expenses in two distinct cost categories: cost of services sold, and office and general expenses. Cost of services sold is primarily comprised of employee compensation related costs and direct costs related primarily to providing services. Office and general expenses are primarily comprised of rent and occupancy costs and administrative service costs including related employee compensation costs. Also included in operating expenses is depreciation and amortization. Because we are a service business, we monitor these costs on a percentage of revenue basis. Cost of services sold tend to fluctuate in conjunction with changes in revenues, whereas office and general expenses and depreciation and amortization, which are not directly related to servicing clients, tend to decrease as a percentage of revenue as revenues increase because a significant portion of these expenses are relatively fixed in nature. Certain Factors Affecting Our Business Acquisitions and Dispositions. MDC’s strategy includes acquiring ownership stakes in well-managed businesses with strong reputations in the industry. MDC has entered into a number of acquisition and disposal transactions during the 2004 to 2006 period, which affected revenues, expenses, operating income and net income. Additional information regarding material acquisitions is provided in Note 4 “Acquisitions” and information on dispositions is provided in Note 11 “Discontinued Operations” in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Foreign Exchange Fluctuations. MDC’s financial results and competitive position are primarily affected by fluctuations in the exchange rate between the US dollar and non-US dollars, primarily the Canadian dollar, as described in Item 1A “Risk Factors—MDC’s results of operations are subject to currency fluctuation risks.” See also “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk—Foreign Exchange.” Further information is provided in “Foreign Currency Translation” in Note 2 of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Seasonality. Historically, with some exceptions, the fourth quarter generates the highest quarterly revenues in a year. The fourth quarter has historically been the period in the year in which the highest volumes of media placements and retail related consumer marketing occur. Other important factors that could affect our results of operations are set forth in “Item 1A Risk Factors.” Sale of Secure Products International Summary of Key Transactions On November 14, 2006, MDC completed the sale of its Secure Products International Group for consideration equal to approximately $27 million. Consideration was received in the form of cash of $20 million and additional $1 million annual payments over the next five years. In addition, MDC received a 7.5% equity interest in the newly 16 formed entity acquiring the Secure Products International Group. During 2006, the Company recorded an impairment loss of $19.5 million and a gain on a sale of $1.8 million. The results of operations of the Secure Products International Group have been included in discontinued operations for all periods presented. Zyman Group Acquisition On April 1, 2005, MDC, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, purchased approximately 61.6% of the total outstanding membership units of Zyman Group, LLC (“Zyman Group”) for a purchase price equal to $52.4 million in cash and 1,139,975 Class A shares of MDC. In addition, MDC may be required to pay up to an additional $12 million in cash and Class A shares to the sellers if Zyman Group achieves specified financial targets for the twelve month periods ending June 30, 2006 and 2007. The Zyman Group did not meet the required targets for the twelve month period ending June 30, 2006. Based on Zyman Group’s expected performance for the twelve months ended June 30, 2007, such financial targets are not expected to be met. MDC’s acquisition of the Zyman Group enabled MDC to expand its capabilities in the areas of strategic marketing knowledge and solutions. During the first five years following MDC’s acquisition of the Zyman Group, MDC’s allocation of profits of the Zyman Group may differ from its proportionate share of ownership. On an annual basis, the Company receives a 20% priority return calculated based on its total investment in Zyman Group. Thereafter, based on calculations set forth in the operating agreement of Zyman Group (the “LLC Agreement”), the Company’s share of remaining Zyman Group profits in excess of a predetermined threshold, may be disproportionately less than its equity ownership in Zyman Group. Specifically, on an annual basis, if Zyman operating results exceed a defined operating margin, the Company would be entitled to 25% of the excess margins in the first two years of the LLC Agreement and 30% of the excess margins in the following three years of the LLC Agreement, rather than the Company’s equity portion of 61.6%. After the first five years, the earnings of the Zyman Group will be allocated in a proportion equal to the respective equity interests of the members. Based on the Company’s investment in the Zyman Group, at December 31, 2006, the annual priority return is expected to be equal to approximately $12.7 million, with the minority owners receiving the next $7.9 million up to the “threshold” amount of $20.6 million. If profits are insufficient to meet the Company’s priority return during any of the first five years, the Company will receive a catch-up payment through year five equal to any shortfall from the prior year(s). Furthermore, if profits do not reach the threshold amount during the first five years, the minority owners will be entitled to receive a catch-up payment through year five equal to any shortfall from the prior year(s). Based on Zyman Group’s results for 2006, the Company received less than its priority return from Zyman Group in 2006. In addition, based on Zyman Group’s expected results for 2007, the Company does not expect to receive more than the sum of its priority return for 2007 and catch-up payments for 2006. 8% Convertible Debentures MDC completed an issuance in Canada of convertible unsecured subordinated debentures amounting to $38.7 million as of December 31, 2005 (C$45.0 million) (the “Debentures”). The Debentures mature on June 30, 2010. The Debentures bear interest at an annual rate of 8.00% payable semi-annually, in arrears, on June 30 and December 31 of each year, commencing December 31, 2005. Because a registration statement for resale of the Debentures was not declared effective on December 31, 2005, but rather during the second quarter of 2006, the Company’s interest rate was 8.5% until June 30, 2006, at which time it was reduced to 8%. Crispin Porter + Bogusky, LLC Effective September 22, 2004, the financial statements of Crispin Porter + Bogusky, LLC (“CPB”), a non- controlled affiliate that was previously accounted for under the equity method, have been consolidated with MDC’s financial statements from that date as a variable interest entity. 17 Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 are presented below: Revenue Cost of services sold Office and general expenses Depreciation and amortization Goodwill and intangible charges Operating Profit (Loss) Other Income (Expense): Other income Foreign exchange gain Interest expense, net Income from continuing operations before income taxes, equity in affiliates and minority interest Income taxes Income from continuing operations before Equity in affiliates and minority interests Equity in earnings of non-consolidated affiliates Minority interests in income of consolidated subsidiaries Loss from continuing operations Loss from discontinued operations Net loss For the Year Ended December 31, 2006 Strategic Marketing Services Customer Relationship Management Specialized Communication Services Corporate Total (thousands of United States dollars) $241,481 $ 118,018 71,589 17,567 — $ 34,307 $ 84,917 $ 61,419 16,531 5,003 — 1,964 $ 97,273 67,362 20,341 1,903 6,306 1,361 — $423,671 246,799 — 132,523 $ 24,062 24,757 284 6,306 — 13,286 $ (24,346) 1,142 614 (10,764) 4,278 2,561 1,717 168 (16,708) (14,823) (18,716) $ (33,539) $ (13,077) $ (73) $ (3,558) $ — Stock-based compensation $ 1,010 $ 24 $ 2,339 $ 4,988 $ 8,361 18 Restated For Discontinued Operations For the Year Ended December 31, 2005 Strategic Marketing Services Customer Relationship Management Specialized Communication Services (thousands of United States dollars) Corporate Total Revenue Cost of services sold Office and general expenses Depreciation and amortization Goodwill charges Operating Profit (Loss) Other Income (Expense): Other income Foreign exchange gain Interest expense, net Income from continuing operations before income taxes, equity in affiliates and minority interest Income taxes Income from continuing operations before equity in affiliates and minority interests Equity in earnings of non-consolidated affiliates Minority interests in income of consolidated subsidiaries Loss from continuing operations Income from discontinued operations Net loss Stock-based compensation $ 203,944 $ 97,316 54,810 17,892 — $ 33,926 $ 67,240 $ 51,913 10,427 3,578 — 1,322 $ 92,178 $ — $ 363,362 211,811 62,582 107,976 17,601 23,143 1,311 473 473 19,959 10,211 25,138 362 $ (25,500) 478 80 (7,474) 13,043 2,336 10,707 1,402 (21,192) (9,083) 1,134 $ (7,949) 3,272 $ $ (18,205) $ (84) $ (2,903) $ — $ 519 $ 81 $ — $ 2,672 19  14,977 (287) (6,618) 12,731 575 12,156 3,651 (9,235) 6,572 (8,729) $ (2,157) 8,388 Restated For Discontinued Operations For the Year Ended December 31, 2004 Strategic Marketing Services Customer Relationship Management Specialized Communication Services Corporate Total Revenue Cost of services sold Office and general expenses Depreciation and amortization Other Charges (recoveries) $110,883 $ 63,106 25,410 5,393 — (thousands of United States dollars) 59,673 $ 43,746 8,847 3,451 — 76,517 $ — $247,073 158,965 52,113 75,893 14,829 10,249 1,168 (2,693) (343) — 26,807 237 (2,350) $ 16,974 $ 3,629 $ 8,750 $ (24,694 ) 4,659 Operating Profit (Loss) Other Income (Expense): Other income Foreign exchange loss Interest expense, net Income from continuing operations before income taxes, equity in affiliates and minority interest Income taxes Income from continuing operations before equity in affiliates and minority interests Equity in earnings of non-consolidated affiliates Minority interests in income of consolidated subsidiaries Income from continuing operations Loss from discontinued operations Net loss Stock-based compensation $ 131 $ 130 $ 78 $ 8,049 $ $ (6,387) $ (245) $ (2,603) $ — Year Ended December 31, 2006 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2005 Revenue was $423.7 million for the year ended 2006, representing a 16.6% increase compared to revenue of $363.4 million for the year ended 2005. This increase relates primarily to organic growth and acquisitions made during 2005. Operating profit for the year ended 2006 was $13.3 million, compared to $20.0 million for the year ended 2005. The decrease in operating profit in 2006 was primarily the result of a goodwill impairment of $6.3 million, additional depreciation and amortization, a $5.0 million increase in stock-based compensation expense and a charge of $2.6 million relating to the closure of one of our West Coast facilities relating primarily to the net present value of lease termination costs. These decreases were offset in part by the increase in revenue, a reduction in outside professional fees, a one time reversal of a liability relating to the termination of a prior commitment of $1.9 million and a reduction in cost of services sold resulting from a change in estimate relating to the elimination of potential liabilities of $1.7 million. The loss from continuing operations for 2006 increased from $9.1 million in 2005, to $14.8 million in 2006, as a result of the items described above. Marketing Communications Group Revenues in 2006 attributable to the Marketing Communications Group, which consists of three reportable segments – Strategic Marketing Services (“SMS”), Customer Relationship Management (“CRM”), and Specialized Communication Services (“SCS”), were $423.7 million compared to $363.4 million in 2005, representing a year- over-year increase of 16.6%. 20 The components of revenue growth for 2006 are shown in the following table: Revenue $000’s % Year ended December 31, 2005 Acquisitions and effect of accounting change Organic Foreign exchange impact Year ended December 31, 2006 $363,362 — 17,152 4.7% 39,483 10.9% 3,674 1.0% $423,671 16.6% The Marketing Communications Group had organic growth of $39.5 million or 10.9% in 2006, primarily attributable to new business wins and additional revenues from existing clients, particularly in the US. A weakening of the US dollar versus the Canadian dollar and UK pound in 2006 compared to 2005 resulted in increased contributions from the division’s Canadian and UK-based operations by approximately $3.7 million. Revenue increased by $13.5 million primarily as a result of the acquisition of the Zyman Group in 2005. Additionally, revenue increased $3.6 million in 2006 as a result of the change in accounting for Zig Inc., Mono Advertising, LLC and Accumark Communications, Inc., all previously accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The geographic mix in revenues was consistent between 2006 and 2005 and is demonstrated in the following table: 2006 2005 US Canada UK and other 84% 84% 14% 2% 14% 2% The operating profit of the Marketing Communications Group decreased by approximately 17.4% to $37.6 million from $45.4 million, with operating margins of 8.9% for 2006 compared to 12.5% in 2005. The decrease in operating margins was primarily reflective of increases in general and other operating costs related to administrative salaries including severance, increased stock based compensation expense, a charge for the closure of one of our West Coast facilities and a goodwill impairment charge, offset by a decrease in direct costs as a percentage of revenue relating in part to a change in estimate relating to the elimination of potential liabilities and the reversal of a liability relating to a prior commitment. Marketing Communications Businesses Strategic Marketing Services (“SMS”) Revenues attributable to SMS in 2006 were $241.5 million compared to $203.9 million in 2005. The year-over- year increase of $37.6 million or 18.4% was attributable primarily to organic growth of $22.4 million, $11.7 million relating to the 2005 acquisition of the Zyman Group, $2.1 million relating to the change in accounting for Zig Inc., and Mono Advertising, LLC, both previously accounted for on the equity method to consolidating them during 2006. A weakening of the US dollar versus the Canadian dollar in 2006 compared to 2005 resulted in a $1.3 million increase or 0.7% in contributions from the division’s Canadian-based operations. Organic growth for 2006 was approximately 10.9% primarily due to new business wins in the US. The operating profit of SMS increased by approximately 1% to $34.3 million from $33.9 million in 2005, while operating margins decreased to 14.2% for 2006 from 16.6% in 2005. These decreased profits were primarily reflective of an increase in total staff costs as a percentage of revenue from 52% in 2005 to 54% in 2006, a $2.6 million charge relating to the closure of one of our West Coast facilities, increased stock based compensation of $0.5 million, offset in part by the increase in revenue, a one time reversal of a liability relating to the termination of a prior commitment of $1.9 million and a reduction in cost of services sold resulting from a change in estimate relating to the elimination of potential liabilities in the amount of $1.7 million. The increase in staff costs results primarily from an increase in head count to service the increase in the organic growth. 21 Customer Relationship Management (“CRM”) Revenues reported by the CRM segment in 2006 were $84.9 million, an increase of $17.7 million or 26.3% compared to the $67.2 million reported for 2005. This growth was due primarily to higher volumes from existing clients in part as a result of the opening of three additional customer care centers during 2006 offset by the closure of one customer care center. Operating profit earned by CRM increased by approximately $0.6 million to $1.9 million for 2006 from $1.3 million for the previous year. Operating margins were 2.3% for 2006 as compared to 2.0% in 2005. The increase was primarily the result of an increase in gross margins primarily from reduced costs incurred relating to the implementation of a new service contract with one of the segment’s large clients, partially offset by increases in office and general expenses as a percentage of revenue and depreciation and amortization. These increases resulted from the start up of three additional customer care centers during fiscal 2006. Specialized Communication Services (“SCS”) SCS generated revenues of $97.3 million for 2006, $5.1 million or 5.5% higher than 2005. Acquisitions accounted for an increase of approximately 1.9%, 1.6% of the increase related to the change for Accumark Communications, Inc. previously accounted for on the equity method to consolidating that entity during 2006, while organic revenue decreased by $0.5 million or 0.6% from 2005 to 2006. This decrease in organic revenue is a result of new business wins offset by a decrease in project related work and the loss of several significant clients. Revenues of the division’s Canadian and UK-based operations increased 2.5% compared to 2005 as a result of a weakening of the US dollar versus the Canadian dollar and UK pound. Similarly, the operating profit of SCS decreased by approximately 86.7% to $1.4 million from $10.2 million in 2005 due primarily to a goodwill impairment charge of $6.3 million resulting from the loss of several significant clients of MFP, an increase in stock based compensation of $2.3 million relating to the price paid for membership interests, which was less than fair value of such membership interests and the fair value of an option granted to certain members of management of Source Marketing LLC during the first quarter of 2006. In addition total staff costs as a percentage of revenue increased to 51.5% in 2006 from 49.8% in 2005, primarily as a result of the loss of clients noted above. Corporate Operating costs related to the Company’s Corporate and Other operations totaled $24.3 million compared to $25.5 million in 2005. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in outside professional fees of $4.5 million resulting from decreased costs relating to compliance costs associated with the Sarbanes-Oxley legislation and a reduction in audit fees. These decreases were offset by an increase in staff costs of $2.7 million relating primarily to an increase in non-cash stock based compensation of $2.3 million. Additional increases in insurance and occupancy costs relating to the establishment of a New York office in December 2005 were offset in part in 2006 by decreases in recruitment costs. Other Income (Expense) and Settlement of Long-Term Debt Other income increased to $1.1 million in 2006 compared to $0.5 million in 2005. The 2006 income is comprised of gains on the sale of assets, the settlement in June 2006, of the Company’s cross currency swap, the recovery of an investment offset in part by a loss on an equity transaction of a subsidiary. The 2005 income is comprised of a recovery of an investment offset by losses on the sale of assets. Foreign Exchange Gain The foreign exchange gain was $0.6 million for 2006 compared to the gain of $0.1 million recorded in 2005 and was due primarily to a weakening in the Canadian dollar compared to the US dollar on the US dollar denominated balances of Canadian subsidiaries. At December 31, 2006, the exchange rate was 1.17 Canadian dollars to one US dollar, compared to 1.16 at the end of 2005. 22 Net Interest Expense Net interest expense for 2006 was $10.8 million, an increase of $3.3 million over the $7.5 million net interest expense incurred during 2005. This increase relates primarily to higher outstanding debt combined with higher interest rates in 2006 due in part to the acquisition of the Zyman Group and the issuance of the 8% Debentures, in June 2005 (which accrued interest at 8.5% during the first six months of 2006). Interest income increased by $0.2 million during 2006 compared to 2005. Income Taxes Income tax expense in 2006 was $2.6 million compared to an expense of $2.3 million for 2005. The Company’s effective tax rate was substantially higher than the statutary rate in 2006 because the Company increased its valuation allowance in an amount equal to the tax loss resulting from the sale of SPI. In 2005, the Company’s effective tax rate was substantially lower than the statutory tax rate due non deductible stock based compensation and to minority interest charges. The Company’s US operating units are generally structured as limited liability companies, which are treated as partnerships for tax purposes. The Company is only taxed on its share of profits, while minority holders are responsible for taxes on their share of the profits. Equity in Affiliates Equity in affiliates represents the income attributable to equity-accounted affiliate operations. For 2006, income of $0.2 million was recorded, $1.2 million lower than the $1.4 million earned in 2005. This decrease was primarily due to the consolidation of Zig Inc., Mono Advertising, LLC and Accumark Communications Inc., which have been consolidated in the Company’s financial statements during 2006, but was previously accounted for under the equity method. In addition, during the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $0.8 million relating to its investment in Cliff Freemen. Minority Interests Minority interest expense was $16.7 million for 2006, down $4.5 million from the $21.2 million of minority interest expense incurred during 2005, primarily due to the decrease in profitability of the SMS operating segment. Discontinued Operations The loss from discontinued operations for 2006 amounted to $18.7 million versus income of $1.1 million for 2005. Discontinued operations is comprised of SPI, Mr Smith Agency, Ltd. (“Mr Smith”) and a variable interest entity whose operations had been consolidated by the Company, LifeMed Media, Inc. (“LifeMed”). On November 14, 2006, the Company completed its sale of SPI, resulting in net proceeds of $27 million. During 2006, the Company had previously recorded an impairment charge of $19.5 million relating to SPI’s long lived assets to adjust them to fair market value. The sale of SPI has resulted in a gain of $2.9 million ($1.8 million net of taxes). The results of operations of SPI for 2006 resulted in a loss of $2.1 million and income of $0.6 million in 2005. Based on the net proceeds and average borrowing rate for each period, the Company has allocated interest expense to discontinued operations of $1.4 million and $1.1 million for the years ended 2006 and 2005, respectively. During July 2005, LifeMed completed a private placement issuing approximately 12.5 million shares at a price of $0.4973 per share. LifeMed received net proceeds of approximately $6.2 million. Consequently, the Company’s ownership interest in LifeMed was reduced to 18.3% from this transaction. As a result of the equity transaction of LifeMed, the Company recorded an equity gain of $1.3 million. This gain represents the Company’s recovery of previously recorded losses in excess of the Company’s original investment and the losses recorded that were in excess of the minority shareholders original investment. The Company no longer has any significant continuing involvement in the management or operations of LifeMed, and has not participated in the purchase of significant new equity offerings by LifeMed. Consequently, as of July 2005, the Company no longer consolidates the operations of LifeMed, and commenced accounting for its remaining investment in LifeMed on a cost basis and has reported the results of operations of LifeMed as discontinued operations for all periods presented in the consolidated 23 statement of operations. During February 2006, the Company further reduced its ownership in LifeMed in connection with a put obligation relating to Secure Marketing LLC. The Company’s current ownership in LifeMed is 5.8%. In November 2004, the Company’s management reached a decision to discontinue Mr. Smith due to its unfavorable operating performance. Substantially all of the net assets of the discontinued business were sold during the fourth quarter of 2004 with the disposition of all activities of Mr. Smith. The remaining sale of assets was completed by the end of the second quarter of 2005. A gain of $0.4 million was recognized in the second and third quarters of 2005 as a result of receivables previously written off being recovered and unsecured liabilities being written off on liquidation. No significant one-time termination benefits were incurred. No further significant charges are expected to be incurred. Net Income As a result of the foregoing, the net loss recorded for 2006 was $33.5 million or a loss of $1.40 per diluted share, compared to the net loss of $7.9 million or $0.34 per diluted share reported for 2005. Year Ended December 31, 2005 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2004 On a consolidated basis, revenue was $363.4 million for the year ended 2005, representing a 47% increase compared to revenue of $247.1 million for the year ended 2004. This increase relates primarily to acquisitions in both 2004 and 2005, together with the consolidation of CPB from September 22, 2004, and organic growth. Operating profit for the year ended 2005 was $20.0 million, compared to $4.7 million for the year ended 2004. The increase in operating income in 2005 was primarily the result of an increase in revenue, a decrease in stock- based compensation expense offset in part by increased compliance costs associated with Sarbanes-Oxley legislation and the establishment of a corporate office in New York. The loss from continuing operations for 2005 increased from income of $6.6 million in 2004, to a loss of $9.1 million in 2005, as a result of the items described above offset primarily by the 2004 gain of $15.0 million of the Company’s divestiture of its remaining interest in CDI. Marketing Communications Group Revenues in 2005 attributable to the Marketing Communications Group were $363.4 million compared to $247.1 million in 2004, representing a year-over-year increase of 47%. The components of revenue growth for 2005 are shown in the following table: Revenue $000’s % Year ended December 31, 2004 $247,073 — Acquisitions and effect of CPB Organic Foreign exchange impact Year ended December 31, 2005 $ 93,138 38% 8% $ 19,700 $ 3,451 1% $363,362 47% The Marketing Communications Group had organic growth of $19.7 million or 8% in 2005, primarily attributable to new business wins and additional revenues from existing clients, particularly in the US. Of the revenue growth, $56.8 million was attributable to acquisitions completed by the Company during 2004 and 2005, of which $45.4 million related to Zyman. The Company acquired a controlling interest in kirshenbaum bond + partners, LLC, during the first quarter of 2004, controlling interests in henderson bas, Hello Design, LLC, Bruce Mau Design Inc., and Banjo, LLC, during the second quarter of 2004, VitroRobertson, LLC during the third quarter of 2004, and the Zyman Group, LLC during the second quarter of 2005. A weakening of the US dollar versus the Canadian dollar and UK pound in 2005 compared to 2004 resulted in increased contributions from the division’s Canadian and UK-based operations by approximately $3.5 million. Additionally, revenue increased $36.4 million in 2005 as a result of the change in accounting of CPB described above. 24 The positive organic growth, combined with acquisitions and the effect of the accounting treatment given to CPB, resulted in a shift in the geographic mix of revenues, due to an increase in the percentage of revenue growth attributable to US operations versus Canadian and UK-based operations compared to the geographic mix experienced in 2004. This shift in the geographic mix in revenues is demonstrated in the following table: 2005 2004 US Canada Other 84% 79% 18% 3% 14% 2% The operating profit of the Marketing Communications Group increased by approximately 55% to $45.5 million from $29.4 million, with operating margins of 12.5% for 2005 compared to 11.9% in 2004. The increase in operating margins was primarily reflective of a decrease in direct costs and staff costs as a percentage of revenue, offset by increases in general and other operating costs related to administrative salaries including severance, increased amortization relating to the Zyman acquisition and the application of consolidation accounting to the results of CPB during 2005 versus equity accounting until September 22, 2004. Marketing Communications Businesses Strategic Marketing Services (“SMS”) Revenues attributable to SMS in 2005 were $203.9 million compared to $110.9 million in 2004. The year-over- year increase of $93.1 million or 84% was attributable primarily to the acquisitions of kirshenbaum bond & partners, LLC in during the first quarter of 2004, VitroRobertson, LLC during the third quarter of 2004 and Zyman Group, LLC during the second quarter of 2005 and the previously discussed change in the accounting of CPB, which has been consolidated since September 22, 2004. A weakening of the US dollar versus the Canadian dollar in 2005 compared to 2004 resulted in a 1.1% increase in contributions from the division’s Canadian-based operations. Organic growth for 2005 was approximately 2.6% compared to 2004 primarily due to new business wins in the US. The operating profit of SMS improved by approximately 100% to $33.9 million from $17.0 million in 2004, while operating margins increased to 16.6% for 2005 from 15.3% in 2004. These increased profits were primarily reflective of the Zyman acquisition and the application of consolidation accounting of the results of CPB for the full year 2005 versus equity accounting until September 22, 2004 and a decrease in staff costs as a percentage of revenue partially offset by an increase in the amortization of intangibles related to both the Zyman and CPB transactions, severance costs and a stock-based compensation charge in 2005. Customer Relationship Management (“CRM”) Revenues reported by the CRM segment in 2005 were $67.2 million, an increase of $7.6 million or 12.7% compared to the $59.7 million reported for 2004. This growth was due primarily to higher volumes from existing clients. Operating profit earned by CRM decreased by approximately $2.3 million to $1.3 million for 2005 from $3.6 million for the previous year. Operating margins were 2.0% for 2005 as compared to 6.1% in 2004. The decrease was primarily the result of a decrease in gross margins primarily from higher costs incurred relating to the implementation of a new service contract with one of the segment’s large clients, and an increase in staff costs that was not fully offset by the increase in revenues generated. Administration expenses as a percentage of revenue were consistent in both periods. Specialized Communication Services (“SCS”) SCS generated revenues of $92.2 million for 2005, $15.7 million or 20.5% higher than 2004. Acquisitions accounted for an increase of approximately 5.5%, while organic growth, reflective of new business wins, was approximately 12% for the 2005 year compared to 2004. Revenues of the division’s Canadian and UK-based operations increased 2.9% compared to 2004 as a result of a weakening of the US dollar versus the Canadian dollar and UK pound. 25 Similarly, the operating profit of SCS increased by approximately 31.9% to $10.2 million from $8.8 million in 2004 due primarily to the increase in revenue and a decrease of total staff costs as a percentage of revenue, partially offset by an increase in direct costs and a slight increase in administrative expense as a percentage of revenue due primarily to severance payments. Consequently, operating margins decreased to 11.1% for 2005, as compared to 11.4% in 2004. Corporate Operating costs related to the Company’s Corporate and Other operations totaled $25.5 million compared to $24.7 million in 2004. Excluding the effects of the recovery of $2.7 million in litigation related accruals in 2004, overhead costs decreased by $1.5 million. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction of stock-based compensation of $5.4 million, offset by the establishment of a corporate office in New York and increased compliance costs associated with Sarbanes-Oxley legislation. Stock-based compensation was $2.7 million in 2005 versus $8.0 million in 2004. The $5.4 million decrease primarily related to charges recorded in 2004 relating to the Company amending its stock appreciation rights plan to amend the method of settlement from cash exclusively to cash or equity at the option of the Company. Other Income (Expense) The other income recorded in 2005 of $0.5 million related primarily to the second quarter settlement of a loan held by Corporate operations which was previously provided for, offset by fixed asset dispositions. The 2004 gain of $15.0 million primarily related to the first quarter divestiture of the Company’s remaining interest in CDI, net of a loss on the settlement of the exchangeable debentures and the fair value adjustments on the related embedded derivative. Foreign Exchange Gain (Loss) The foreign exchange gain was $0.1 million for 2005 compared to the loss of $0.3 million recorded in 2004 and was due primarily to fluctuations of the Canadian dollar compared to the US dollar on the US dollar denominated balances of Canadian subsidiaries. Net Interest Expense Net interest expense for 2005 was $7.5 million, an increase of $0.9 million over the $6.6 million net interest expense incurred during 2004. This increase relates primarily to higher outstanding debt combined with higher interest rates in 2005 due to the acquisition of the Zyman Group and the issuance of the 8% Debentures. Interest expense was reduced on a year-to-date basis by $0.2 million related to the mark-to-market adjustment of a swap agreement. (See “Liquidity and Capital Resources”). Interest income decreased by $0.3 million due to better utilization of cash balances to repay debt. Income Taxes Income tax expense in 2005 was $2.3 million compared to an expense of $0.6 million for 2004. The Company’s effective tax rate was substantially lower than the statutory tax rate due to minority interest charges in both 2005 and 2004. The Company’s US operating units are generally structured as limited liability companies, which are treated as partnerships for tax purposes. The Company is only taxed on its share of profits, while minority holders are responsible for taxes on their share of the profits. In 2004, the effective rate was lower than the statutory rate because the Company did not recognize a tax charge related to the gain on sale of an affiliate as a result of available tax losses for which a full valuation allowance had previously been recorded. Equity in Affiliates Equity in affiliates represents the income attributable to equity-accounted affiliate operations. For 2005, income of $1.4 million was recorded, $2.2 million lower than the $3.7 million earned in 2004. This decrease was primarily 26 due to the consolidation of CPB, which has been consolidated in the Company’s financial statements since September 22, 2004, but was previously accounted for under the equity method. Minority Interests Minority interest expense was $21.2 million for 2005, up $12 million from the $9.2 million of minority interest expense incurred during 2004, primarily due to the earnings of CPB which have been recorded on a consolidated basis since September 22, 2004, and other recent acquisitions. Discontinued Operations The income from discontinued operations for 2005 amounted to $1.1 million versus a loss of $8.7 million for 2004. Discontinued operations is comprised of the SPI, Mr Smith and a variable interest entity whose operations had been consolidated by the Company, LifeMed Media, Inc. (“LifeMed”). On November 14, 2006, the Company completed its sale of SPI. The results of operations of SPI for 2005 was income of $0.6 million compared to a loss of $1.6 million in 2004. Based on the net proceeds and average borrowing rate for each period, the Company has allocated interest expense to discontinued operations of $1.1 million for each of the years ended 2005 and 2004. During July 2005, LifeMed completed a private placement issuing approximately 12.5 million shares at a price of $0.4973 per share. LifeMed received net proceeds of approximately $6.2 million. Consequently, the Company’s ownership interest in LifeMed was reduced to 18.3% from this transaction. As a result of the equity transaction of LifeMed, the Company recorded an equity gain of $1.3 million. This gain represents the Company’s recovery of previously recorded losses in excess of the Company’s original investment and the losses recorded that were in excess of the minority shareholders original investment. The Company no longer has any significant continuing involvement in the management or operations of LifeMed, and has not participated in the purchase of significant new equity offerings by LifeMed. Consequently, as of July 2005, the Company no longer consolidates the operations of LifeMed, and commenced accounting for its remaining investment in LifeMed on a cost basis and has reported the results of operations of LifeMed as discontinued operations for all periods presented in the consolidated statement of operations. In November 2004, the Company’s management reached a decision to discontinue Mr. Smith due to its unfavorable operating performance. Substantially all of the net assets of the discontinued business were sold during the fourth quarter of 2004 with the disposition of all activities of Mr. Smith. The remaining sale of assets was completed by the end of the second quarter of 2005. A gain of $0.4 million was recognized in the second and third quarters of 2005 as a result of receivables previously written off being recovered and unsecured liabilities being written off on liquidation. No significant one-time termination benefits were incurred. No further significant charges are expected to be incurred. Net Income As a result of the foregoing, the net loss recorded for 2005 was $7.9 million or a loss of $0.34 per diluted share, compared to the net loss of $2.2 million or $0.09 per diluted share reported for 2004. 27 Liquidity and Capital Resources The following table provides information about the Company’s liquidity position: Liquidity Cash and cash equivalents Working capital (deficit) Cash from operations Cash from investing Cash from financing $ 2006 2004 2005 (in thousands, except for long-term debt to shareholders’ equity ratio) 6,591 $ 12,923 $ 22,644 $(105,039) $ (99,935) $(35,854) $ 39,705 $ 20,254 $ 4,670 $ (14,315) $ (67,404) $(27,679) $(34,367) $ (31,597) $ 52,316 Long-term debt to shareholders’ equity ratio 0.37 0.81 0.37 As at December 31, 2006 and 2005, $2.3 million and $5.3 million, respectively, of the consolidated cash position was held by subsidiaries, which, although available for the subsidiaries’ use, does not represent cash that is distributable as earnings to MDC for use to reduce its indebtedness. It is the Company’s intent through its cash management system to reduce outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility using available cash. Working Capital At December 31, 2006, the Company had a working capital deficit of $105.0 million compared to a deficit of $99.9 million at December 31, 2005. Working capital decreased by $5.1 million primarily due to seasonal shifts in amounts billed to clients, and paid to suppliers, primarily media outlets. The Company includes amounts due to minority interest holders, for their share of profits, in accrued and other liabilities during 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company made distributions to these minority interest holders of $19.4 million, $17.6 million and $5.4 million, respectively. At December 31, 2006, $11.1 million remains outstanding to be distributed to minority interest holders over the next twelve months. The Company expects that available borrowings under the Credit Facility, and expected refinancings thereof, together with cash flows from operations, will be sufficient at any particular time to adequately fund working capital deficits should there be a need to do so from time to time. Operating Activities Cash flow provided by continuing operations for 2006 was $34.7 million. This was attributable primarily to a loss from continuing operations of $14.8 million, plus non-cash stock based compensation of $7.4 million, depreciation and amortization of $27.0 million, an impairment charge of $6.3 million, an increase in accounts payable, accruals and other liabilities of $38.1 million and an increase in advance billings of $15.3 million. This was partially offset by increases in accounts receivable and expenditures billable to clients of $38.2 million. Discontinued operations provided cash of $5.0 million. Cash flow provided by continuing operations, for 2005 was $1.5 million. This was attributable primarily to the loss from continuing operations of $9.1 million, plus non-cash depreciation and amortization of $24.4 million, non- cash stock-based compensation of $3.3 million, and a decrease in accounts receivable of $4.5 million. This was partially offset by a decrease in accounts payable of $10.1 million and a decrease in advance billings of $7.9 million. Discontinued operations provided cash of $3.2 million. The cash flow provided by continuing operations, amounted to $18.0 million for 2004. This was attributable primarily to a loss income from continuing operations of $6.6 million plus stock-based compensation of $8.4 million, depreciation and amortization of $10.2 million, amortization and write-off of deferred finance charges of $6.2 million and an increase in accounts payable, accruals, other liabilities and advanced billings of $22.9 million. This was partially offset by an increase in expenditures billable to clients of $16.1 million and a gain on the disposition of assets and settlement of long-term debt of $19.0 million. Discontinued operations provided cash of $2.3 million. 28 Investing Activities Cash flows used in investing activities were $14.3 million for 2006, compared with $67.4 million in 2005, and $27.7 million in 2004. Expenditures for capital assets of continuing operations in 2006, 2005 and 2004 were $22.6 million, $10.8 million and $8.3 million, respectively. During 2006, the Company received net proceeds of $16.4 million in connection with the sale of SPI and used $7.5 million of cash to fund acquisitions, step-ups in ownership of certain partner firms and earnout payments. Cash flow used in acquisitions of continuing operations was $56.8 million in 2005 and primarily related to the purchase of the Zyman Group. Cash flow used in acquisitions was $17.6 million in 2004 and related primarily to the acquisition activities and deferred purchase payments. For further details relating to the Company’s acquisitions, see Note 4 of the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K. Profit distributions received from non-consolidated affiliates amounted to $1.0 million for 2006 compared to $1.8 million for 2005 compared to $7.3 million in 2004. The decrease between 2006 and 2005 related primarily to the consolidation of certain partner firms during 2006, which had been previously accounted for on the equity method of accounting. The $5.5 million decrease from 2004 to 2005 was primarily due to distributions from CPB in 2004 when it was accounted for on an equity basis. Since September 22, 2004, this entity has been consolidated as a variable interest entity. Discontinued operations used cash of $2.1 million, $2.4 million and $7.3 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, relating to expenditures for capital assets. Financing Activities During 2006, the Company used cash of $31.6 million to repay borrowings under the Credit Facility and payments under capital leases and other debt. Discontinued operations used cash of $3.2 million for payments under capital leases. During 2005, cash flows provided by financing activities of continuing operations amounted to $52.3 million, and consisted of proceeds related to the issuance of $36.7 million of 8% convertible debentures in the second quarter, and borrowings under the Credit Facility used to fund the acquisition of the Zyman Group. Payments made of $6.8 million consist of payments under capital leases, bank borrowings, and debt assumed in the Zyman Group acquisition. In addition, the Company incurred $3.3 million of finance costs related to both the convertible debentures and the various amendments under the credit facility. Discontinued operations used cash for payments under capital leases of $1.9 million. Cash flows used in financing activities of continuing operations during 2004 were $34.4 million and consisted of the proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt of $61.2 million, borrowing of $6.0 million under the credit facility, a repayment of $92.8 million of long-term debt, proceeds of $3.6 million from the issuance of share capital through a private placement and the exercise of options, and $12.5 million used to repurchase shares of the Company under a normal course issuer bid. Discontinued operations provided cash of $0.1 million. Total Debt Debt as of December 31, 2006 was $95.5 million, a decrease of $27.7 million compared with the $123.2 million outstanding at December 31, 2005, primarily as a result of repayments of the Company’s Credit Facility. The Credit Facility expires in September 2007; the Company is currently in the process of pursuing a new facility. During 2005 and 2006, the Company amended or obtained waivers under the Credit Facility, as follows: • On March 31, 2005, the Company received a limited waiver from the lenders under its Credit Facility, pursuant to which the lenders agreed to give the Company until April 15, 2005 to deliver its financial statements for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2004. • In order to finance the Zyman Group acquisition, the Company entered into an additional amendment to its Credit Facility on April 1, 2005. This amendment provided for, among other things, (i) an increase in the total revolving commitments available under the Credit Agreement from $100 million to $150 million, 29 (ii) permission to consummate the Zyman Group acquisition, (iii) mandatory reductions of the total revolving commitments by $25 million on June 30, 2005, $5 million on September 30, 2005, $10 million on December 31, 2005 and $10 million on March 31, 2006, (iv) reduced flexibility to consummate acquisitions going forward and (v) modification to the fixed charges ratio and total debt ratio financial covenants. • On May 9, 2005, the Company further amended the terms of its Credit Facility. Pursuant to such amendment, among other things, the lenders (i) modified the Company’s total debt ratio covenant; and (ii) waived the default that occurred as a result of the Company’s failure to comply with its total debt ratio covenant solely with respect to the period ended March 31, 2005. • On June 6, 2005, the Company further amended its Credit Facility to permit the issuance of 8% convertible unsecured subordinated debentures (see below). In addition, pursuant to this amendment, the lenders (i) modified the definition of ‘‘Total Debt Ratio’’ to exclude the 8% convertible unsecured subordinated debentures from such definition, (ii) required a reduction of the revolving commitments under the Credit Facility from $150.0 million to $116.2 million effective June 28, 2005, a reduction equal to the net proceeds received by the Company from the issuance of these debentures, (iii) imposed certain restrictions on the ability of the Company to amend the documentation governing the debentures, and (iv) modified the Company’s fixed charges ratio covenant, effective upon issuance of these debentures. • On October 31, 2005, the Company further amended its Credit Facility. Pursuant to such amendment, among other things, the lenders (i) reduced the revolving commitments under the Credit Facility to $105 million, effective as of the date of the amendment, with a further reduction of $5 million on December 31, 2005; (ii) modified the Company’s “total debt ratio” and “fixed charges ratio” covenants; (iii) effective April 15, 2006, added a 1.0% per annum facility fee on the amount of the revolving commitments under the Credit Facility in excess of $65 million, which fee will be payable beginning on April 15, 2006 and for so long as the revolving commitments under the Credit Facility are in excess of $65 million; and (iv) waived the default that may have occurred as a result of the Company’s failure to comply with its total debt ratio covenant and fixed charges covenant with respect to the test period ended September 30, 2005. In addition, in the event of a sale of the Company’s secure products business, the Company must repay advances under the Credit Facility by an amount equal to the net proceeds received by the Company from such sale (“Sale Net Proceeds”), and the revolving commitments under the facility would be reduced by an amount equal to the Sale Net Proceeds. • On November 3, 2006, the Company amended its Credit Facility. Pursuant to such amendment, among other things, the lenders (i) amended the “net worth” financial covenant to include an addition for any losses on sale or non-cash impairment charges recorded in connection with the disposition of the Secure Products International business; (ii) reduced the commitment reduction requirement based upon net cash proceeds received from the sale of SPI in excess of $12.5 million; and (iii) modified the Company’s “total debt ratio” covenant. • On March 8, 2007, the Company further amended its Credit Facility. Pursuant to such amendment, the lenders agreed to amend the restrictive covenants to permit the Company to make two proposed acquisitions that will require up to $10 million in cash to be paid at closing. The 2006 and 2005 amendments to the Credit Facility were necessary in order to avoid an event of default under the Credit Facility, to finance the Zyman Group acquisition, to approve the sale of SPI, and to permit the Company to continue to borrow under the Credit Facility. The Company is currently in compliance with all of the terms and conditions of its amended Credit Facility, and management believes, based on its current financial projections, that the Company will be in compliance with covenants over the next twelve months. If the Company loses all or a substantial portion of its lines of credit under the Credit Facility, it will be required to seek other sources of liquidity. If the Company were unable to find these sources of liquidity, for example through an equity offering or access to the capital markets, the Company’s ability to fund its working capital needs and any contingent obligations with respect to put options would be adversely affected. Pursuant to the Credit Facility, the Company must comply with certain financial covenants including, among other things, covenants for (i) total debt ratio, (ii) fixed charges ratio, (iii) minimum liquidity, (iv) minimum net worth and (v) limitations on capital expenditures, in each case as such term is specifically defined in the Credit 30 Facility. For the period ended December 31, 2006, the Company’s calculation of each of these covenants, and the specific requirements under the Credit Facility, respectively, were as follows: Total Debt Ratio Maximum per covenant Fixed Charges Ratio Minimum per covenant Minimum Liquidity Minimum per covenant Net Worth Minimum per covenant Capital Expenditures: December 2006 1.87 to 1.0 3.25 to 1.0 1.76 to 1.00 1.25 to 1.00 $45.8 million $10.4 million $142.1 million $132.0 million Marketing Communications Group Maximum per covenant $24.0 million $26.4 million These ratios are not based on generally accepted accounting principles and are not presented as alternative measures of operating performance or liquidity. They are presented here to demonstrate compliance with the covenants in the Company’s Credit Facility, as non-compliance with such covenants could have a material adverse effect on the Company. 8% Convertible Unsecured Subordinated Debentures On June 28, 2005, the Company completed a public offering in Canada of convertible unsecured subordinated debentures amounting to $36.7 million (C$45.0 million) (the “Debentures”). The Debentures will mature on June 30, 2010. The Debentures will bear interest at an annual rate of 8.00% payable semi-annually, in arrears, on June 30 and December 31 of each year, commencing December 31, 2005. Unless an event of default has occurred and is continuing, the Company may elect, from time to time, subject to applicable regulatory approval, to issue and deliver Class A subordinate voting shares to the Debenture trustee in order to raise funds to satisfy all or any part of the Company’s obligations to pay interest on the Debentures in accordance with the indenture in which event holders of the Debentures will be entitled to receive a cash payment equal to the interest payable from the proceeds of the sale of such Class A subordinate voting shares by the Debenture trustee. The Debentures will be convertible at the holder’s option into fully-paid, non-assessable and freely tradeable Class A subordinate voting shares of the Company, at any time prior to maturity or redemption, subject to the restrictions on transfer, at a conversion price of $12.01 (C$14.00) per Class A subordinate voting share being a ratio of approximately 71.4286 Class A subordinate voting shares per $816 (C$1,000) principal amount of Debentures. The Debentures may not be redeemed by the Company on or before June 30, 2008. Thereafter, but prior to June 30, 2009, the Debentures may be redeemed, in whole or in part from time to time, at a price equal to the principal amount of the Debenture plus accrued and unpaid interest, provided that the volume weighted average trading price of the Class A subordinate voting shares on The Toronto Stock Exchange during a specified period is not less than 125% of the conversion price. From July 1, 2009 until the maturity of the Debentures, the Debentures may be redeemed by the Company at a price equal to the principal amount of the Debenture plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. The Company may elect to satisfy the redemption consideration, in whole or part, by issuing Class A subordinate voting shares of the Company to the holders, the number of which will be determined by dividing the principal amount of the Debenture by 95% of the current market price of the Class A subordinate voting shares on the redemption date. Upon the occurrence of a change of control of the Company involving the acquisition of voting control or direction over 50% or more of the outstanding Class A subordinate voting shares prior to June 30, 2008, the Company shall be required to make an offer to purchase all of the then outstanding Debentures at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof plus an amount equal to the interest payments not yet received on the Debentures calculated from the date of the change of control to June 30, 2008, discounted at a specified rate. Upon the occurrence of a change of control on or after June 30, 2008, the Company shall be required to make an offer to purchase all of the then outstanding Debentures at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Debentures plus accrued and unpaid interest to the purchase date. 31 Disclosure of Contractual Obligations and Other Commercial Commitments The following table provides a payment schedule of present and future obligations. Management anticipates that the obligations outstanding at December 31, 2006 will be repaid with new financing, equity offerings and/or cash flow from operations (in thousands): Contractual Obligations Payments Due by Period Total Less than 1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years After 5 years Indebtedness Capital lease obligations Operating leases Deferred acquisition consideration Management services agreement Total contractual obligations $ 88,819 $ 45,537 $ 4,668 $ 38,614 $ — 6 1,725 14,957 79,690 — 3,967 — 790 $14,963 $ 174,991 640 15,890 2,721 790 $ 65,578 315 20,041 157 — $ 59,127 764 28,802 1,089 — $35,323 The following table provides a summary of other commercial commitments (in thousands) at December 31, 2006: Other Commercial Commitments Payments Due by Period Total Less than 1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years After 5 years Lines of credit Letters of credit Total Other Commercial Commitments $ 4,910 $ 4,485 $ 9,395 $ 4,910 $ — $ — $ — — 4,485 $ — 9,395 — $ — — $ — For further detail on MDC’s long-term debt principal and interest payments, see Note 13 of the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-K. See also “Off-Balance Sheet Commitments” below. Capital Resources At December 31, 2006, the Company had utilized approximately $48.9 million of its Credit Facility in the form of drawings and letters of credit. Cash and undrawn available bank credit facilities to support the Company’s future cash requirements, as at December 31, 2006, was approximately $47.6 million. The Company expects to incur approximately $11 million of capital expenditures in 2007. Such capital expenditures are expected to include leasehold improvements; furniture and fixtures, and computer equipment at certain of the Company’s operating subsidiaries. The Company intends to maintain and expand its business using cash from operating activities, together with funds available under the Credit Facility and, if required, by raising additional funds through the incurrence of bridge or other debt (which may include or require further amendments to the Credit Facility) or the issuance of equity. Management believes that the Company’s cash flow from operations and funds available under the Credit Facility, and expected refinancings thereof, will be sufficient to meet its ongoing working capital, capital expenditures and other cash needs over the next eighteen months. If the Company has significant organic growth or growth through acquisitions, management expects that the Company may need to obtain additional financing in the form of debt and/or equity financing. Deferred Acquisition Consideration (Earnouts) Acquisitions of businesses by the Company include commitments to contingent deferred purchase consideration payable to the seller. The contingent purchase obligations are generally payable annually over a three-year period following the acquisition date, and are based on achievement of certain thresholds of future earnings and, in certain cases, also based on the rate of growth of those earnings. The contingent consideration is recorded as an obligation of the Company when the contingency is resolved and the amount is reasonably determinable. At December 31, 2006, approximately $2.7 million of the deferred consideration relates to acquisitions in 2004 and is presented on the Company’s balance sheet. Based on the various assumptions as to future operating results of the relevant entities, including the April 1, 2005 acquisition of the Zyman Group, management estimates that approximately $1.3 million of additional deferred purchase obligations could be triggered during 2008 or thereafter, including approximately 32 $0.3 million which may be paid in the form of issuance by the Company of its Class A shares. The actual amount that the Company pays in connection with the obligations may be materially different from this estimate. Off-Balance Sheet Commitments Put Rights of Subsidiaries’ Minority Shareholders Owners of interests in certain of the Company’s subsidiaries have the right in certain circumstances to require the Company to acquire the remaining ownership interests held by them. These rights are not freestanding. The owners’ ability to exercise any such “put” right is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including conditions requiring notice in advance of exercise. In addition, these rights cannot be exercised prior to specified staggered exercise dates. The exercise of these rights at their earliest contractual date would result in obligations of the Company to fund the related amounts during the period 2007 to 2014. It is not determinable, at this time, if or when the owners of these rights will exercise all or a portion of these rights. The amount payable by the Company in the event such rights are exercised is dependent on various valuation formulas and on future events, such as the average earnings of the relevant subsidiary through that date of exercise, the growth rate of the earnings of the relevant subsidiary during that period, and, in some cases, the currency exchange rate at the date of payment. Management estimates, assuming that the subsidiaries owned by the Company at December 31, 2006, perform over the relevant future periods at their 2006 earnings levels, that these rights, if all exercised, could require the Company, in future periods, to pay an aggregate amount of approximately $116.6 million to the owners of such rights to acquire such ownership interests in the relevant subsidiaries. Of this amount, the Company is entitled, at its option, to fund approximately $24.8 million by the issuance of the Company’s Class A Shares. The ultimate amount payable and the incremental operating income in the future relating to these transactions will vary because it is dependent on the future results of operations of the subject businesses and the timing of when these rights are exercised. Approximately $8.7 million of the estimated $116.6 million that the Company would be required to pay subsidiaries minority shareholders’ upon the exercise of outstanding “put” rights, relates to rights exercisable within the next twelve months. See “Item 1A—Risk Factors.” The following table summarizes the potential timing of the consideration and incremental operating income before depreciation and amortization based on assumptions as described above. Consideration(4) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 & Thereafter Total Cash Shares Operating income before depreciation and amortization to be received(2) Cumulative operating income before depreciation and amortization(3) $ 7.7 $ 28.8 $ 13.0 $ 30.7 $ ($ millions) 1.0 $ 8.7 7.7 $ 36.5 3.8 $ 16.8 8.4 $ 39.1 $ 1.8 $ 9.7 $ 1.5 $ 3.3 $ $ 11.6 $ 91.8 24.8 3.9 $ 116.6(1) 15.5 3.3 $ 19.6 $ 1.8 $ 11.5 $ 13.0 $ 16.3 (5) —————— (1) Of this, approximately $43.3 million has been recognized in Minority Interest on the Company’s balance sheet as of September 22, 2004 in conjunction with the consolidation of CPB as a variable interest entity. (See Note 8) to the consolidated financial statements. (2) This financial measure is presented because it is the basis of the calculation used in the underlying agreements relating to the put rights and is based on actual 2006 operating results. This amount represents amounts to be received in the year the put is exercised. (3) Cumulative operating income before depreciation and amortization represents the cumulative amounts to be received by the company. (4) The timing of consideration to be paid varies by contract and does not necessarily correspond to the date of the exercise of the put. (5) Amounts are not presented as they would not be meaningful due to multiple periods included. 33 Approximately $8.7 million of the estimated $116.6 million that the Company could be required to pay subsidiaries’ minority shareholders upon the exercise of outstanding “put” option rights relates to rights exercisable in 2007 in respect of the securities of five subsidiaries. The Company expects to fund the acquisition of these interests, if and when they become due, through the use of cash derived from operations, bank borrowings and/or other external sources of financing. The acquisition of any equity interest in connection with the potential exercise of these rights in 2007 will not be recorded in the Company’s financial statements until equity ownership is transferred. Guarantees In connection with certain dispositions of assets and/or businesses in 2001 and 2003, as well as the 2006 sale of SPI, the Company has provided customary representations and warranties whose terms range in duration and may not be explicitly defined. The Company has also retained certain liabilities for events occurring prior to sale, relating to tax, environmental, litigation and other matters. Generally, the Company has indemnified the purchasers in the event that a third party asserts a claim against the purchaser that relates to a liability retained by the Company. These types of indemnification guarantees typically extend for several years. In connection with the sale of the Company’s investment in CDI, the amounts of indemnification guarantees are limited to the total sale price of approximately $84 million. For the remainder, the Company’s potential liability for these indemnifications are not subject to a limit as the underlying agreements do not always specify a maximum amount and the amounts are dependent upon the outcome of future contingent events. Historically, the Company has not made any significant indemnification payments under such agreements and no provision has been accrued in the accompanying consolidated financial statements with respect to these indemnification guarantees. The Company continues to monitor the conditions that are subject to guarantees and indemnifications to identify whether it is probable that a loss has occurred, and would recognize any such losses under any guarantees or indemnifications in the period when those losses are probable and estimable. For guarantees and indemnifications entered into after January 1, 2003, in connection with the sale of the Company’s investment in CDI and the sale of SPI, the Company has estimated the fair value of its liability to be insignificant. Transactions with Related Parties The Company incurred fees and paid incentive awards totaling $2.4 million, $2.4 million and $2.8 million in 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, to companies controlled by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company in respect of services rendered pursuant to the terms of a management services agreement and incentive plans. The management services agreement provides for an annual retainer fee of $1.0 million and is effective through October 31, 2007, subject to renewal. The Company incurred fees totaling $0.3 million in 2004 paid to a company controlled by a director of the Company in respect of services provided related to the monetization of CDI. No amounts were similarly incurred during 2006 and 2005. A subsidiary of the Company also provided marketing communications services totaling $0.1 million in 2006 and 2005 and less than $0.1 million in 2004 to an entity of which an officer of the Company is a Trustee of such entity. In 2000, the Company agreed to provide to its Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), Miles S. Nadal, a bonus of C$10 million ($8.6 million) in the event that the average market price of the Company’s Class A subordinate voting shares is $26 (C$30) per share or more for more than 20 consecutive trading days (measured as of the close of trading on each applicable date). This bonus is payable until the date that is three years after the date on which Mr. Nadal is no longer employed by the Company for any reason. The after-tax proceeds of such bonus are to be applied first as repayment of any outstanding loans due to the Company from this officer and his related companies. Such loans are in the amount of C$6.8 million ($5.9 million) with no stated maturity date and C$3.0 million ($2.6 million), due on November 1, 2007. As at December 31, 2006 and 2005, both of these amounts have been reserved for in the Company’s accounts. 34 In 2000, the Company purchased 1,600,000 shares in Trapeze Media Limited (“Trapeze”) for $0.2 million. At the same time, the Company’s CEO purchased 4,280,000 shares of Trapeze for $0.6 million, the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer and a Managing Director of the Company each purchased 50,000 Trapeze shares for $7,000 and a Board Member of the Company purchased 75,000 shares of Trapeze for $10,000. In 2001, the Company purchased an additional 1,250,000 shares for $0.2 million, and the Company’s CEO purchased 500,000 shares for $0.1 million. In 2002, the Company’s CEO purchased 3,691,930 shares of Trapeze for $0.5 million. All of these purchases were made at identical prices (i.e. C$0.20/unit). In 2003, the Company and the CEO exchanged their shares in Trapeze for non-voting shares and entered into a voting trust agreement. In 2002, 2003 and 2004, the Company’s CEO advanced an aggregate amount equal to $0.2 million to Trapeze, and such loans were secured by Trapeze’s assets. In 2004, Trapeze repaid $0.1 million of the amounts owed to the Company’s CEO. In February 2005, the Company’s CEO provided Trapeze with a $0.2 million line of credit. The line of credit accrues interest at annual interest rate equal to 15%. During 2006 and 2005 total interest and fees paid were approximately $14,000 and $66,000, respectively. At December 31, 2005, Trapeze had borrowed $0.2 million under this line of credit. During 2006, all advances had been repaid and at December 31, 2006 no amounts were borrowed under this line of credit. In addition, in 2006, 2005 and 2004, Trapeze paid $33,000, $31,000 and $20,000, respectively, in fees for accounting and other services to an entity affiliated with the Company’s CEO. During 2006 and 2005, Trapeze provided services to certain partner firms, the total amount of such services provided were $0.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively. The Company’s Board of Directors, through its Audit Committee, has reviewed and approved these transactions. Critical Accounting Policies The following summary of accounting policies has been prepared to assist in better understanding the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the related management discussion and analysis. Readers are encouraged to consider this information together with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements as included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for a more complete understanding of accounting policies discussed below. Estimates. The preparation of the Company’s financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, or “GAAP”, requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities including goodwill, intangible assets, valuation allowances for receivables and deferred income tax assets, stock-based compensation, and the reporting of variable interest entities at the date of the financial statements. The statements are evaluated on an ongoing basis and estimates are based on historical experience, current conditions and various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results can differ from those estimates, and it is possible that the differences could be material. Revenue Recognition The Company’s revenue recognition policies are in compliance with the SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 104, “Revenue Recognition” (“SAB 104”), and accordingly, revenue is generally recognized when services are earned or upon delivery of the products when ownership and risk of loss has transferred to the customer, the selling price is fixed or determinable and collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. The Company earns revenue from agency arrangements in the form of retainer fees or commissions; from short- term project arrangements in the form of fixed fees or per diem fees for services; and from incentives or bonuses. Non-refundable retainer fees are generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the specific customer contract. Commission revenue is earned and recognized upon the placement of advertisements in various media when the Company has no further performance obligations. Fixed fees for services are recognized upon completion of the earnings process and acceptance by the client. Per diem fees are recognized upon the performance of the Company’s services. In addition, for certain service transactions, which require delivery of a number of service acts, the Company uses the Proportional Performance model, which generally results in revenue being recognized based on the straight-line method due to the acts being non-similar and there being insufficient evidence of fair value for each service provided. 35 Fees billed to clients in excess of fees recognized as revenue are classified as advance billings. A small portion of the Company’s contractual arrangements with clients includes performance incentive provisions, which allow the Company to earn additional revenues as a result of its performance relative to both quantitative and qualitative goals. The Company recognizes the incentive portion of revenue under these arrangements when specific quantitative goals are achieved, or when the Company’s clients determine performance against qualitative goals has been achieved. In all circumstances, revenue is only recognized when collection is reasonably assured. In July 2000, the EITF of the Financial Accounting Standards Board released Issue No. 99 19, “Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent” (“EITF 99 19). This Issue summarized the EITF’s views on when revenue should be recorded at the gross amount billed because revenue has been earned from the sale of goods or services, or the net amount retained because a fee or commission has been earned. In the Marketing Communications Group businesses, the business at times acts as an agent and records revenue equal to the net amount retained, when the fee or commission is earned. Acquisitions, Goodwill and Other Intangibles. A fair value approach is used in testing goodwill for impairment under SFAS 142 to determine if an other than temporary impairment has occurred. One approach utilized to determine fair values is a discounted cash flow methodology. When available and as appropriate, comparative market multiples are used. Numerous estimates and assumptions necessarily have to be made when completing a discounted cash flow valuation, including estimates and assumptions regarding interest rates, appropriate discount rates and capital structure. Additionally, estimates must be made regarding revenue growth, operating margins, tax rates, working capital requirements and capital expenditures. Estimates and assumptions also need to be made when determining the appropriate comparative market multiples to be used. Actual results of operations, cash flows and other factors used in a discounted cash flow valuation will likely differ from the estimates used and it is possible that differences and changes could be material. The Company incurred goodwill and intangible impairment charges of $6.3 million and $0.5 million in 2006 and 2005, respectively. No impairment charge was recognized in 2004. The Company has historically made and expects to continue to make selective acquisitions of marketing communications businesses. In making acquisitions, the price paid is determined by various factors, including service offerings, competitive position, reputation and geographic coverage, as well as prior experience and judgment. Due to the nature of advertising, marketing and corporate communications services companies; the companies acquired frequently have significant identifiable intangible assets, which primarily consist of customer relationships. The Company has determined that certain intangibles (trademarks) have an indefinite life, as there are no legal, regulatory, contractual, or economic factors that limit the useful life. A summary of the Company’s deferred acquisition consideration obligations, sometimes referred to as earnouts, and obligations under put rights of subsidiaries’ minority shareholders to purchase additional interests in certain subsidiary and affiliate companies is set forth in the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section of this report. The deferred acquisition consideration obligations and obligations to purchase additional interests in certain subsidiary and affiliate companies are primarily based on future performance. Contingent purchase price obligations are accrued, in accordance with GAAP, when the contingency is resolved and payment is determinable. Allowance for doubtful accounts. Trade receivables are stated less allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance represents estimated uncollectible receivables usually due to customers’ potential insolvency. The allowance includes amounts for certain customers where risk of default has been specifically identified. Income tax valuation allowance. The Company records a valuation allowance against deferred income tax assets when management believes it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized. Management considers factors such as the reversal of deferred income tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, the character of the income tax asset, tax planning strategies, changes in tax laws and other factors. A change to these factors could impact the estimated valuation allowance and income tax expense. Stock-based compensation. Effective January 1, 2003, the Company prospectively adopted fair value accounting for stock-based awards as prescribed by SFAS No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”. Prior to January 1, 2003, the Company elected not to apply fair value accounting to stock-based awards to employees, other than for direct awards of stock and awards settleable in cash, which required fair value accounting. Prior to January 1, 2003, for awards not elected to be accounted for under the fair value method, the Company accounted for stock-based compensation in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion 25, “Accounting 36 for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”). APB 25 is based upon an intrinsic value method of accounting for stock-based compensation. Under this method, compensation cost is measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the stock issuance at the measurement date over the amount to be paid by the employee. The Company adopted fair value accounting for stock-based awards using the prospective method available under the transitional provisions of SFAS No. 148 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation—Transition and Disclosure”. Accordingly, the fair value method is applied to all awards granted, modified or settled on or after January 1, 2003. Under the fair value method, compensation cost is measured at fair value at the date of grant and is expensed over the service period, that is the award’s vesting period. When awards are exercised, share capital is credited by the sum of the consideration paid together with the related portion previously credited to additional paid- in capital when compensation costs were charged against income or acquisition consideration. Stock-based awards that are settled in cash or may be settled in cash at the option of employees are recorded as liabilities. The measurement of the liability and compensation cost for these awards is based on the fair value of the award, and is recorded into operating income over the service period, that is the vesting period of the award. Changes in the Company’s payment obligation subsequent to vesting of the award and prior to the settlement date are recorded as compensation cost over the service period in operating income. The final payment amount for Share Appreciation Rights is established on the date of the exercise of the award by the employee. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS 123(R) and has opted to use the modified prospective application transition method. Under this method the Company will not restate its prior financial statements. Instead, the Company will apply SFAS 123(R) for new awards granted or modified after the adoption of SFAS 123(R), any portion of awards that were granted after December 15, 1994 and have not vested as of January 1, 2006, and any outstanding liability awards. Variable Interest Entities. The Company evaluates its various investments in entities to determine whether the investee is a variable interest entity and if so whether MDC is the primary beneficiary. Such evaluation requires management to make estimates and judgments regarding the sufficiency of the equity at risk in the investee and the expected losses of the investee and may impact whether the investee is accounted for on a consolidated basis. New Accounting Pronouncements The following recent pronouncements were issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”): Effective in Future Periods In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”. This Interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”. This Interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, with earlier application permitted. The Company does not believe the adoption of this interpretation will have a material effect on its financial statements. In September 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”. This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement is effective for all fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is encouraged. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this statement on its consolidated financial statements. In September 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans”. This statement requires employers with defined benefit plans to recognize the over funded or under funded status of a defined benefit plan. This statement also expands the required disclosures around these plans. This statement is effective for all fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006. The adoption of this statement did not impact the Company’s financial statements. In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 108. This guidance requires registrants to quantify the misstatement of current year financial statements that result from misstatements of prior year financial statements. This guidance is effective for annual financial statements covering the first fiscal year ending after November 15, 2006. The Company has adopted this guidance, and the adoption did not have any effect on its financial statements. 37 In February 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). This statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This statement expands the use of fair value measurement and applies to entities that elect the fair value option. The fair value option established by this Statement permits all entities to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates. SFAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. We have not determined the effect, if any, the adoption of this statement will have on our financial statements. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk The Company is exposed to market risk related to interest rates and foreign currencies. Debt Instruments: At December 31, 2006, the Company’s debt obligations consisted of amounts outstanding under a revolving credit facility. This facility bears interest at variable rates based upon the Eurodollar rate, US bank prime rate, US base rate, and Canadian bank prime rate, at the Company’s option. The Company’s ability to obtain the required bank syndication commitments depends in part on conditions in the bank market at the time of syndication. Given the existing level of debt of $45 million, as of December 31, 2006, a 1.0% increase or decrease in the weighted average interest rate, which was 8.13% at December 31, 2006, would have an interest impact of approximately $0.5 million annually. Foreign Exchange: The Company conducts business in five currencies, the US dollar, the Canadian dollar, Jamaican dollar, the Mexican Peso and the British Pound. Our results of operations are subject to risk from the translation to the US dollar of the revenue and expenses of our non-US operations. The effects of currency exchange rate fluctuations on the translation of our results of operations are discussed in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Result of Operations” and in Note 2 of our consolidated financial statements. For the most part, our revenues and expenses incurred related to our non-US operations are denominated in their functional currency. This minimizes the impact that fluctuations in exchange rates will have on profit margins. The Company does not enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts or other derivative financial instruments to hedge the effects of adverse fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Effective June 28, 2005, the Company entered into a cross-currency swap contract (“Swap”), a form of derivative, in order to mitigate the risk of currency fluctuations relating to interest payment obligations. The Swap contract provides for a notional amount of debt fixed at C$45.0 million and at $36.5 million, with the interest rates fixed at 8% per annum for the Canadian dollar amount and fixed at 8.25% per annum for the US dollar amount. On June 22, 2006, the Company settled this swap and recorded a gain of $0.2 million. 38 Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data MDC PARTNERS INC. INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Financial Statements: Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Years Ended December 31, 2006 Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Years Ended December 31, 2006 Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the Three Years ended December 31, 2006 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Financial Statement Schedules: Schedule II—Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the Three Years ended December 31, 2006 Page 40 42 43 44 45 46 95 39 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM Board of Directors and Shareholders MDC Partners Inc. New York, New York We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of MDC Partners Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and the related consolidated statement of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2006. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MDC Partners Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2006, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of MDC Partners Inc. and subsidiaries internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated March 15, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. /s/BDO SEIDMAN, LLP New York, New York March 15, 2007 40 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM The Board of Directors and Shareholders MDC Partners Inc.: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of MDC Partners Inc. and subsidiaries (“the Company”) as of December 31, 2005 and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedule II for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MDC Partners Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule for the year ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. /s/KPMG LLP Toronto, Canada March 15, 2006, except as to Note 11, which is as of March 15, 2007 41 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (thousands of United States dollars, except share and per share amounts) Revenue: Services Operating Expenses: Cost of services sold* Office and general expenses** Depreciation and amortization Other charges (recoveries) Goodwill and intangible impairment Operating Profit Other Income (Expenses) Gain on sale of assets, settlement of long-term debt and other Foreign exchange gain, (loss) Interest expense Interest income Income from continuing operations before income taxes, equity in affiliates and minority interests Income taxes Income from continuing operations before equity in affiliates and minority interests Equity in earnings of non consolidated affiliates Minority interests in income of consolidated subsidiaries Income (loss) from continuing operations Income (loss) from discontinued operations Net loss Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share: Basic Continuing operations Discontinued operations Net loss Diluted Continuing operations Discontinued operations Net loss Years Ended December 31, 2005 2004 2006 $ 423,671 $ 363,362 $ 247,073 246,799 132,523 24,757 — 6,306 410,385 13,286 1,142 614 (11,278) 514 (9,008) 4,278 2,561 211,811 107,976 23,143 — 473 343,403 19,959 478 80 (7,822) 348 (6,916) 13,043 2,336 1,717 168 (16,708) (14,823) (18,716) (33,539) $ 10,707 1,402 (21,192) (9,083) 1,134 (7,949) $ (0.62) $ (0.78) (1.40) $ (0.62) $ (0.78) (1.40) $ (0.39) $ 0.05 (0.34) $ (0.39) $ 0.05 (0.34) $ $ $ $ $ $ 158,965 75,893 10,249 (2,693) — 242,414 4,659 14,977 (287) (7,266) 648 8,072 12,731 575 12,156 3,651 (9,235) 6,572 (8,729) (2,157) 0.31 (0.41) (0.10) 0.29 (0.38) (0.09) Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding: Basic Diluted 23,875,286 23,875,286 23,298,795 23,298,795 21,353,268 22,817,823 —————— * Includes non cash stock-based compensation expense of $3,373, $578 and $339 during the years ended December31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. ** Includes non cash stock-based compensation expense of $4,988, $2,694 and $8,049 during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements. 42 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (thousands of United States dollars) December 31, 2006 2005 Current Assets: ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,633 and $1,250 Expenditures billable to clients Prepaid expenses Other current assets Assets held for sale Total Current Assets Fixed assets, net Investment in affiliates Goodwill Other intangible assets Deferred tax assets Assets held for sale Other assets Total Assets LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY Current Liabilities: Bank debt Revolving credit facility Accounts payable Accrued and other liabilities Advance billings, net Current portion of long-term debt Liabilities related to assets held for sale Deferred acquisition consideration Total Current Liabilities Long-term debt Convertible notes Liabilities related to assets held for sale Other liabilities Deferred tax liabilities Total Liabilities Minority interests Commitments, contingencies and guarantees (Note 18) Shareholders’ Equity: 6,591 $ 12,923 $ 125,744 101,121 7,838 28,077 3,779 4,816 356 1,248 27,179 — 166,476 153,196 34,241 10,929 203,693 195,026 57,139 14,398 31,838 10,548 $ 493,501 $ 507,315 48,933 13,332 — 14,584 44,425 2,058 $ 4,910 $ 45,000 90,588 75,315 51,804 1,177 — 2,721 3,739 73,500 56,982 66,102 33,206 1,645 16,216 1,741 271,515 253,131 5,571 38,694 2,334 7,937 2,446 322,534 310,113 44,484 5,754 38,613 — 5,512 1,140 46,553 Preferred shares, unlimited authorized, none issued Class A Shares, no par value, unlimited authorized, 23,923,522 and 23,437,615 shares issued in 2006 and 2005, respectively Class B Shares, no par value, unlimited authorized, 2,502 and 2,502 shares issued in 2006 and 2005, respectively, convertible into one Class A share Share capital to be issued Additional paid-in capital Accumulated deficit Stock subscription receivable Accumulated other comprehensive income Total Shareholders’ Equity Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity — — 184,698 178,589 1 1 4,209 — 20,028 26,216 (53,075) (86,614) (643) — 2,966 756 124,414 152,718 $ 493,501 $ 507,315 The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements. 43 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (thousands of United States dollars) Years Ended December 31, 2005 2006 2004 Cash flows from operating activities: Net loss Income (loss) from discontinued operations Income (loss) from continuing operations Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) from continuing operations to cash provided by operating activities: Stock-based compensation Depreciation and amortization Amortization and write-off of deferred finance charges Deferred income taxes (Gain) loss on disposition of assets and settlement of long-term debt Goodwill and intangible impairment charges Earnings of non consolidated affiliates Minority interest and other Changes in non-cash working capital Accounts receivable Expenditures billable to clients Prepaid expenses and other current assets Accounts payable, accruals and other liabilities Advance billings Cash flows from continuing operating activities Discontinued operations Net cash provided by operating activities Cash flows from investing activities: Capital expenditures Net proceeds from sale of business Proceeds of dispositions Acquisitions, net of cash acquired Profit distributions from non consolidated affiliates Other assets Discontinued operations Net cash used in investing activities Cash flows from financing activities: Increase (decrease) in bank indebtedness Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes Repayment of debt Deferred financing costs Subsidiary issuance of share capital Issuance of share capital Purchase of share capital Discontinued operations Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents Decrease in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year Cash and cash equivalents at end of year Supplemental disclosures: Cash paid to minority partners Cash income taxes paid Cash interest paid Non-cash transactions: Share capital issued, or to be issued, on acquisitions Share capital issued on settlement of convertible notes Stock-based awards issued, on acquisitions Capital leases Note receivable exchanged for shares of subsidiary Notes and equity received on sale business Settlement of debt with investment in affiliate: Reduction in exchangeable securities Proceeds on sale of investment (33,539) $ (18,716) (14,823) (7,949) $ 1,134 (9,083) (2,157) (8,729) 6,572 7,360 24,757 2,213 298 — 6,306 (168) (4,666) (18,605) (19,554) (1,864) 38,136 15,298 34,688 5,017 39,705 (22,648) 16,407 656 (7,530) 940 — (2,140) (14,315) 1,171 — — (30,149) — 385 177 — (3,181) (31,597) (125) (6,332) 12,923 6,591 3,272 23,143 1,305 (878) 278 473 (1,402) (2,193) 4,503 458 (405) (10,093) (7,863) 1,515 3,155 4,670 (10,842) — — (56,805) 1,796 848 (2,401) (67,404) (2,287) 27,501 36,723 (4,464) (3,316) — 31 — (1,872) 52,316 697 (9,721) 22,644 $ 12,923 19,359 1,459 9,920 $ 17,559 918 $ 5,762 $ 4,459 — — 1,351 1,540 5,648 $ 14,794 — $ — $ 1,467 122 — $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 8,388 10,249 6,212 (2,544) (19,047) — (3,651) (2,013) 5,576 (16,083) 1,366 5,213 17,729 17,967 2,287 20,254 (8,309) — — (17,569) 7,269 (1,804) (7,266) (27,679) 6,026 61,199 — (92,818) — — 3,639 (12,476) 63 (34,367) (898) (42,690) 65,334 22,644 5,354 2,968 4,708 20,840 34,919 1,319 — — — $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ — — $ $ — — $ (33,991) 33,991 $ The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements. 44 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (thousands of United States dollars) 2006 2005 2004 Number of Shares Amount Number of Shares Amount Number of Shares Amount 23,437,615 $ 178,589 21,937,871 $ Class A Shares Balance at beginning of year Stock appreciation rights exercised Share options exercised Shares acquired and cancelled Shares issued as acquisition consideration Shares issued as deferred acquisition consideration Shares issued on privatization of Maxxcom Shares issued on private placement Shares issued upon conversion of Class B shares Shares issued on settlement of convertible notes Balance at end of year 99,844 30,400 — 30,058 315,247 10,358 — — — 23,923,522 830 820 — 250 4,209 — — — — $ 184,698 Class B Shares Balance at beginning of year Shares converted to Class A shares Balance at end of year Share Capital to be Issued Balance at beginning of year Shares to be issued as deferred acquisition consideration Shares issued as deferred acquisition consideration Balance at end of year 2,502 — 2,502 Additional Paid-In Capital Balance at beginning of year Stock-based compensation Acquisition contingency payment Warrants granted to service providers Share appreciation rights plan Share options exercised Share appreciation rights exercised Balance at end of year Accumulated Deficit Balance at beginning of year Premium paid on repurchase of Class A shares Distribution to minority shareholder Loss for the year Balance at end of year Stock Subscription Receivable Balance at beginning of year Exercise of stock options Receipts for exercise of stock options Balance at end of year Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Balance at beginning of year Foreign currency translation adjustments Balance at end of year Total Shareholders’ Equity $ $ $ $ 1 — 1 4,209 (4,209) — $ 20,028 7,395 (377) — — — (830) $ 26,216 $ (53,075) — — (33,539) $ (86,614) $ $ $ — (674) 31 (643) 2,966 (2,210) 756 — 5,258 — 1,139,975 354,511 — — — — 23,437,615 2,502 — 2,502 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 164,064 18,369,451 $ 115,861 25 3,507 (8,719) 16,931 — — 1,406 134 34,919 $ 164,064 1,998 241,755 (1,070,000) 1,243,753 — — 120,919 447,968 2,582,027 21,937,871 — 31 — 11,257 3,237 — — — — 178,589 1 — 1 450,470 (447,968) 2,502 3,909 300 — 4,209 17,113 775 — — 2,140 — — 20,028 (45,083) — (43) (7,949) (53,075) — — — — $3,147 (181) 2,966 135 (134) 1 — 3,909 — 3,909 $ $ $ $ 4,610 6,347 1,313 — 6,142 (1,274) (25) $ 17,113 $ (39,169) (3,757) — (2,157) $ (45,083) $ $ $ — — — — (1,631) 4,778 3,147 $ 124,414 $ 152,718 $ 143,151 The accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements. 45 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 1. Basis of Presentation MDC Partners Inc. (the “Company”) has prepared the consolidated financial statements included herein pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) of the United States of America (“US GAAP”). Nature of Operations MDC Partners Inc., formerly MDC Corporation Inc., is incorporated under the laws of Canada. The Company commenced using the name MDC Partners Inc. on November 1, 2003 and legally changed its name through amalgamation with a wholly-owned subsidiary on January 1, 2004. The Company’s operations are in primarily one business group—Marketing Communications. The business group operates primarily in the United States (“US”), Canada and in the United Kingdom. See Note 16, “Segment Information”, for further description of the one business group and MDC’s reportable segments. Change in Methods of Accounting Effective January 1, 2004, the Company changed its method of accounting from Canadian GAAP to US GAAP. This change in accounting method resulted from the conversion of Class B multiple voting shares into Class A subordinate voting shares during the first quarter of 2004 (see Note 14). Due to the conversion of these shares, the majority of shareholder votes now belong to shareholders of the Company who reside in the US and, as a result, the Company is now deemed to be a US domestic issuer as defined under the SEC regulations to which the Company is subject. 2. Significant Accounting Policies The Company’s significant accounting policies are summarized as follows: Principles of Consolidation. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of MDC Partners Inc. its domestic and international controlled subsidiaries that are not considered variable interest entities and variable interest entities for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated on consolidation. Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities including goodwill, intangible assets, valuation allowances for receivables and deferred tax assets, and the reporting of variable interest entities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. The estimates are evaluated on an ongoing basis and estimates are based on historical experience, current conditions and various other assumptions believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Concentration of Credit Risk. The Company provides marketing communications services to clients who operate in most industry sectors. Credit is granted to qualified clients in the ordinary course of business. Due to the diversified nature of the Company’s client base, the Company does not believe that it is exposed to a concentration of credit risk as no client accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s consolidated accounts receivable as of December 31, 2006 and 2005. For the year ended December 31, 2006, one customer accounted for 15.5% of revenue, for the years ended December 31, 2005, no single customer accounted for more than 10% of revenues. In 2004, one client represented approximately 13% of MDC’s revenue for the year. Cash and Cash Equivalents. The Company’s cash equivalents are primarily comprised of investments in overnight interest-bearing deposits, commercial paper and money market instruments and other short-term investments with original maturity dates of three months or less at the time of purchase. The Company has a concentration of credit risk in that there are cash deposits in excess of federally insured amounts. Included in cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2006 and 2005 is $132 and $1,301, respectively of cash restricted as to withdrawal pursuant to a collateral agreement and a customer’s contractual requirement. 46 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 2. Significant Accounting Policies – (continued) Allowance for Doubtful Accounts. Trade receivables, exclusive of sales tax are stated at invoiced amounts less allowances for doubtful accounts. The allowances represent estimated uncollectible receivables associated with potential customer defaults usually due to customers’ potential insolvency. The allowances include amounts for certain customers where a risk of default has been specifically identified. The assessment of the likelihood of customer defaults is based on various factors, including the length of time the receivables are past due, historical experience and existing economic conditions. Expenditures Billable to Clients. Expenditures billable to clients consist principally of costs incurred on behalf of clients when providing advertising, marketing and corporate communications services to clients that have not been invoiced. Such amounts are invoiced to clients at various times over the course of the production process. Fixed Assets. Fixed assets are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Buildings are depreciated on a declining balance basis over the estimated useful lives of 20 to 25 years. Computers, furniture and fixtures are depreciated on a straight-line basis over periods of 3 to 7 years. Machinery and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over periods of 3 to 10 years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the term of the related lease or the estimated useful life of the asset. Repairs and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred. Impairment of Long-lived Assets. In accordance with SFAS, No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-lived Assets,” (“SFAS No. 144”) a long-lived asset or asset group is tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. When such events occur, the Company compares the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset or asset group to the carrying amount of the long-lived asset or asset group. If this comparison indicates that there is an impairment, the amount of the impairment is typically calculated using discounted expected future cash flows where observable fair values are not readily determinable. The discount rate applied to these cash flows is based on the Company’s weighted average cost of capital, risk adjusted where appropriate. Equity Method Investments. The equity method is used to account for investments in entities in which the Company has an ownership interest of less than 50% and has significant influence, or joint control by contractual arrangement with all parties having an equity interest, over the operating and financial policies of the affiliate or has an ownership interest of greater than 50% however the substantive participating rights of the minority interest shareholders preclude the Company from exercising unilateral control over the operating and financial policies of the affiliate. The Company’s investments accounted for using the equity method include Cliff Freeman & Partners, LLC (“CF”), 19.9% owned by the Company, Fuse Project, LLC, 20.0% owned by Crispin Porter Bogusky, LLC (“CPB”) and a 50% undivided interest in a real estate joint venture. Until September 22, 2004, the Company’s 49.0% interest in CPB was accounted for under the equity method. After this date, the Company commenced consolidating CPB under the accounting standards for variable interest entities (see Note 8). The Company’s management periodically evaluates these investments to determine if there has been a decline in value that is other than temporary. During 2006, the Company also accounted for Zig, Inc., Mono Advertising, LLC and Accumark Communications Inc. on the equity method; however, as a result of changes in their operating agreements, and/or ownership structure, the Company has consolidated these entities as of December 31, 2006. Cost Method Investments. The Company’s cost-based investments at December 31, 2006 were primarily comprised of various interests in limited partnerships and companies where the Company does not exercise significant influence over the operating and financial policies of the investee. The total net cost basis of these investments, which are included in Other Assets on the balance sheet, as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 was $2,896 and $756, respectively. These investments are periodically evaluated to determine if there have been any other than temporary declines below book value. A variety of factors are considered when determining if a decline in fair value below book value is other than temporary, including, among others, the financial condition and prospects of the investee, as well as the Company’s investment intent. In addition, the Company has a 7.5% interest in newly formed entity which purchased the Secured Products International Group. See Note 11. 47 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 2. Significant Accounting Policies – (continued) Goodwill and Indefinite Lived Intangibles. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS No 142”), goodwill and indefinite life intangible assets (trademarks) acquired as a result of a business combination which are not subject to amortization are tested for impairment annually, and more frequently if events and circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the asset’s fair value. For goodwill, this determination is made at the reporting unit level and consists of two steps. First, the Company determines the fair value of a reporting unit and compares it to its carrying amount. Fair value is determined based on earnings multiples. Second, if the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized for any excess of the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill over the implied fair value of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation, in accordance with SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations”. The residual fair value after this allocation is the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill. Impairment losses, where applicable, will be charged to operating profit. The Company identifies certain intangible assets (trademarks) as indefinite life if there are no legal, regulatory, contractual or economic factors that limit the useful life. If the carrying amount of an indefinite life intangible exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized for the excess. The Company incurred goodwill and intangible impairment charges of $6,306 in 2006 and $473 in 2005, primarily as a result of current and expected operating results, due to the loss of several large clients. Definite Lived Intangible Assets. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, acquired intangibles, are subject to amortization over their useful lives. The method of amortization selected reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits of the specific intangible asset is consumed or otherwise used up. If that pattern cannot be reliably determined, a straight-line amortization method is used over the estimated useful life. Intangible assets that are subject to amortization are reviewed for potential impairment in accordance with SFAS 144 at least annually or whenever events or circumstances indicate that carrying amounts may not be recoverable. See also Note 9. Deferred Taxes. The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Deferred income taxes are provided for the temporary difference between the financial reporting basis and tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Deferred tax benefits result principally from recording certain expenses in the financial statements that are not currently deductible for tax purposes and from differences between the tax and book basis of assets and liabilities recorded in connection with acquisitions. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax liabilities result principally from deductions recorded for tax purposes in excess of that recorded in the financial statements. The effect of changes in tax rates is recognized in the period the rate change is enacted. Minority Interest. The Company accounts for minority interest in two accounts, long term minority interest and short term minority interest. Long term minority interest represents the minority holders share of equity in the related subsidiaries that is not expected to be distributed in the near term. Short term minority interest represents the minority holders share of current year profits that are expected to be distributed within the next twelve months. Guarantees. Guarantees issued or modified by the Company to third parties after January 1, 2003 are generally recognized, at the inception or modification of a guarantee, as a liability for the obligations it has undertaken in issuing the guarantee, including its ongoing obligation to stand ready to perform over the term of the guarantee in the event that the specified triggering events or conditions occur. The initial measurement of that liability is the fair value of the guarantee. The recognition of the liability is required even if it is not probable that payments will be required under the guarantee. The Company’s liability associated with guarantees is not significant. (See Note 18) 48 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 2. Significant Accounting Policies – (continued) Revenue Recognition The Company’s revenue recognition policies are in compliance with the SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin 104, “Revenue Recognition” (“SAB 104”), and accordingly, revenue is generally recognized as services are provided or upon delivery of the products when ownership and risk of loss has transferred to the customer, the selling price is fixed or determinable and collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. In November 2002, EITF Issue No. 00-21, “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables” (“EITF 00-21 was issued. EITF 00-21”) addresses certain aspects of the accounting by a vendor for arrangements under which it will perform multiple revenue-generating activities and how to determine whether an arrangement involving multiple deliverables contains more than one unit of accounting. EITF 00 21 is effective for revenue arrangements entered into in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2003. Also, in July 2000, the EITF of the Financial Accounting Standards Board released Issue No. 99-19, “Reporting Revenue Gross as a Principal versus Net as an Agent” (“EITF 99-19”). This Issue summarized the EITF’s views on when revenue should be recorded at the gross amount billed because it has earned revenue from the sale of goods or services, or the net amount retained because it has earned a fee or commission. The Company earns revenue from agency arrangements in the form of retainer fees or commissions; from short- term project arrangements in the form of fixed fees or per diem fees for services; and from incentives or bonuses. Non refundable retainer fees are generally recognized on a straight line basis over the term of the specific customer contract. Commission revenue is earned and recognized upon the placement of advertisements in various media when the Company has no further performance obligations. Fixed fees for services are recognized upon completion of the earnings process and acceptance by the client. Per diem fees are recognized upon the performance of the Company’s services. In addition, for certain service transactions, which require delivery of a number of service acts, the Company uses the Proportional Performance model, which generally results in revenue being recognized based on the straight-line method due to the acts being non-similar and there being insufficient evidence of fair value for each service provided. Fees billed to clients in excess of fees recognized as revenue are classified as Advanced Billings. A small portion of the Company’s contractual arrangements with customers includes performance incentive provisions, which allows the Company to earn additional revenues as a result of its performance relative to both quantitative and qualitative goals. The Company recognizes the incentive portion of revenue under these arrangements when specific quantitative goals are achieved, or when the company’s clients determine performance against qualitative goals has been achieved. In all circumstances, revenue is only recognized when collection is reasonably assured. The Company records revenue net of sales and other taxes due to be collected and remitted to governmental authorities. Cost of Services Sold. Costs of services sold do not include depreciation charges for related fixed assets. Stock-Based Compensation. Effective January 1, 2003, the Company prospectively adopted fair value accounting for stock-based awards as prescribed by SFAS No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS No. 123”). Prior to January 1, 2003, the Company elected not to apply fair value accounting to stock-based awards to employees, other than for direct awards of stock and awards settleable in cash, which required fair value accounting. Prior to January 1, 2003, for awards not elected to be accounted for under the fair value method, the Company accounted for stock-based awards in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” (“APB 25”). APB 25 is based upon an intrinsic value method of accounting for stock-based awards. Under this method, compensation cost is measured as the excess, if any, of the quoted market price of the stock issuance at the measurement date over the amount to be paid by the employee. 49 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 2. Significant Accounting Policies – (continued) The Company adopted fair value accounting for stock-based awards using the prospective application transitional alternative available in SFAS 148 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure”. Accordingly, the fair value method is applied to all awards granted, modified or settled on or after January 1, 2003. Under the fair value method, compensation cost is measured at fair value at the date of grant and is expensed over the service period, that is the award’s vesting period. When awards are exercised, share capital is credited by the sum of the consideration paid together with the related portion previously credited to additional paid- in capital when compensation costs were charged against income or acquisition consideration. The Company uses its historical volatility derived over the expected term of the award, to determine the volatility factor used in determining the fair value of the award. The Company uses the “simplified” method to determine the term of the award. Stock-based awards that are settled in cash or may be settled in cash at the option of employees are recorded as liabilities. The measurement of the liability and compensation cost for these awards is based on the fair value of the award, and is recorded into operating income over the service period, that is the vesting period of the award in accordance with FASB Interpretation Number 28 “Accounting for Stock Appreciation Rights and Other Variable Stock Option or Award Plans — an interpretation of APB Opinions No. 15 and 25” (“FIN 28”). Changes in the Company’s payment obligation subsequent to vesting of the award and prior to the settlement date are recorded as compensation cost in operating profit in the period of the change. The final payment amount for such awards is established on the date of the exercise of the award by the employee. Stock-based awards that are settled in cash or equity at the option of the Company are recorded at fair value on the date of grant and recorded as additional paid-in capital. The fair value measurement of the compensation cost for these awards is based on using the Black-Scholes option pricing-model and is recorded in operating income over the service period, that is the vesting period of the award. The fair value of the stock options and similar awards at the grant date were estimated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for each of the following years: Years Ended December 31, 2006 2005 2004 Expected dividend Expected volatility Risk-free interest rate Expected option life in years Weighted average fair value of options granted 0% 0% 32.2-40% 4.57%-4.95% 40% 2.9% 3.9% 5.75-7 4.50 3.16 2.56 $ $ 0% 40% 4.0% 3.71 $ 4.65 Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS 123(R) and has opted to use the modified prospective application transition method. Under this method the Company has not restated its prior financial statements. Instead, the Company applies SFAS 123(R) for new awards granted or modified after the adoption of SFAS 123(R), any portion of awards that were granted after December 15, 1994 and have not vested as of January 1, 2006, and any outstanding liability awards. It is the Company’s policy for issuing shares upon the exercise of an equity incentive award to verify the amount of shares to be issued, as well as the amount of proceeds to be collected (if any) and delivery of new shares to the exercising party. Measurement of compensation cost for awards that are outstanding and classified as equity, at January 1, 2006, will be based on the original grant-date fair value calculations of those awards. The Company had previously adopted SFAS 123 and as such has been expensing the fair value of all awards issued after January 1, 2003. For all previously issued awards, the Company has been providing pro-forma disclosure for such awards. Upon the adoption of SFAS 123(R), the Company expenses the fair value of the awards granted prior to January 1, 2003. The Company has adopted the straight-line attribution method for determining the compensation cost to be recorded during each accounting period. However, awards based on performance conditions are recorded as compensation expense when the performance conditions are expected to be met. The adoption of SFAS 123(R) did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. 50 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 2. Significant Accounting Policies – (continued) The table below summarizes the pro forma effect, had the Company adopted the fair value method of accounting for stock options and similar instruments for awards issued prior to 2003 and prior to the adoption of SFAS 123(R). Net loss as reported Fair value costs, net of income tax, of stock-based employee compensation awards issued prior to 2003 Net loss, pro forma Basic net loss per share, as reported Basic net loss per share, pro forma Diluted net loss per share, as reported Diluted net loss per share, pro forma Years Ended December 31, 2005 2004 $ (7,949 ) $ (2,157) 683 $ (8,632 ) (0.34 ) $ (0.37 ) $ (0.34 ) $ (0.37 ) $ 1,123 $ (3,280) (0.10) $ (0.15) $ (0.09) $ (0.14) $ At December 31, 2006, there remains $5,679 of compensation lost related to all awards not yet vested. The weighted-average period over which this compensation cost will be recognized is three years. Pension Costs. Several of the Company’s US and Canadian subsidiaries offer employees access to certain defined contribution pension programs. Under the defined contribution plans, these subsidiaries, in some cases, make annual contributions to participants’ accounts based on individual base salaries and years of service. The Company’s contribution expense pursuant to these plans was $1,476, $1,144 and $782 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Earnings Per Common Share. Basic earnings per share is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period, including the “Share capital to be issued” as reflected in the Shareholders’ Equity on the balance sheet. Diluted earnings per share is based on the above, plus, if dilutive, common share equivalents, which include outstanding options, warrants, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units and convertible notes. Sale of Subsidiary Interests. The Company records all dilution gains and loses on sales of subsidiary interests as a component of the statement operations as other income (expense). Foreign Currency Translation. The Company’s financial statements were prepared in accordance with the requirements of SFAS No. 52, “Foreign Currency Translation” (“SFAS 52”). The functional currency of the Company is the Canadian dollar and it has decided to use US dollars as its reporting currency for consolidated reporting purposes. All of the Company’s subsidiaries use their local currency as their functional currency in accordance with SFAS 52. Accordingly, the currency impacts of the translation of the balance sheets of the Company’s non-US dollar based subsidiaries to US dollar statements are included as cumulative translation adjustments in accumulated other comprehensive income. Cumulative translation adjustments are not included in net earnings unless they are actually realized through a sale or upon complete or substantially complete liquidation of the Company’s net investment in the foreign operation. The balance sheets of non-US dollar based subsidiaries are translated at the period end rate. The income statements of non-US dollar based subsidiaries are translated at average exchange rates for the period. Gains and losses arising from the Company’s foreign currency transactions are reflected in net earnings other than those unrealized gains or losses arising on the translation of certain intercompany foreign currency transactions that are of a long-term nature (that is settlement is not planned or anticipated in the future) and which are included as cumulative translation adjustments in accumulated other comprehensive income. 51 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 2. Significant Accounting Policies – (continued) Derivative Financial Instruments. The Company follows SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (“SFAS 133”). SFAS 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards requiring that every derivative instrument (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and debt instruments) be recorded in the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value. The accounting for the change in fair value of the derivative depends on whether the instrument qualifies for and has been designated as a hedging relationship and on the type of hedging relationship. There are three types of hedging relationships: a cash flow hedge, a fair value hedge and a hedge of foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation. The designation is based upon the exposure being hedged. Derivatives that are not hedges, or become ineffective hedges, must be adjusted to fair value through earnings. Effective June 28, 2005, the Company entered into a cross currency swap contract (“Swap”), a form of derivative. The Swap contract provides for a notional amount of debt fixed at $45,000 Canadian dollars (“C$”) and at $36,452, with the interest rates fixed at 8% per annum for the Canadian dollar amount and fixed at 8.25% per annum for the US dollar amount. Consequently, under the terms of this Swap, semi-annually, the Company will receive interest of C$1,800 and will pay interest of $1,503 per annum. At December 31, 2005, the Swap fair value was estimated to be a receivable of $180 and is reflected in Other Assets on the Company’s balance sheet with the change in the value of the swap reflected in interest expense. On June 22, 2006, the Company settled this swap for its fair value of $357, which resulted in a gain of $192 for the year ended December 31, 2006 and is included in other income. Put Options. The minority interest shareholders of certain subsidiaries have the right to require the Company to acquire their ownership interest under certain circumstances pursuant to a contractual arrangement and the Company has similar call options under the same contractual terms. The amount of consideration under the put and call rights is not a fixed amount, but rather is dependent upon various valuation formulas and on future events, such as the average earnings of the relevant subsidiary through the date of exercise, the growth rate of the earnings of the relevant subsidiary through the date of exercise, etc. as described in Note 18. The Company accounts for the put options with a charge to minority interest expense to reflect the excess, if any, of the estimated exercise price over the estimated fair value of the minority shares at the date of the option being exercised. No recognition is given to any increase in value of the put option if the estimated exercise price is less than the estimated fair value of the minority interest shares. The estimated exercise price is determined based on defined criteria pursuant to each arrangement. The commitment is calculated at each reporting period based on the earliest contractual exercise date. The estimated fair value of the minority interest shares is based on an overall enterprise value determined by a multiple of historical and projected future earnings. 52 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 3. Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share from continuing operations for the years ended December 31: Numerator Numerator for diluted earnings (loss) per common share – income (loss) from continuing operations plus assumed conversion Denominator Denominator for basic earnings (loss) per common share – weighted average common shares Effect of dilutive securities: Warrants Employee stock options, warrants, and stock appreciation rights Employee restricted stock units Dilutive potential common shares Denominator for diluted earnings (loss) per common share – adjusted weighted shares and assumed conversions Basic earnings (loss) per common share from continuing operations Diluted earnings (loss) per common share from continuing operations 2006 2005 2004 $ (14,823) $ (9,083) $ 6,572 23,875,286 23,298,795 21,353,268 — — — — — — — — 59,462 1,393,277 11,816 1,464,555 23,875,286 $ (0.62) $ 23,298,795 22,817,823 0.31 (0.39) $ $ (0.62) $ (0.39) $ 0.29 At December 31, 2006 and 2005, convertible notes, warrants, options and other rights to purchase 8,504,707 and 6,667,015 shares of common stock respectively, were not included in the computation of diluted loss per common share because doing so would have had an antidilutive effect. Option and other rights to purchase 352,497 shares of common stock were outstanding during fiscal 2004 but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common shares and, therefore, the effect would be antidilutive. 4. Acquisitions 2006 Acquisitions During 2006, the Company did not complete any material acquisitions, however the Company did complete the following transactions: On February 7, 2006, the Company purchased the remaining outstanding membership interests of 12.33% of Source Marketing LLC (“Source”) pursuant to an exercise of a put option notice delivered in October 2005. The purchase price of $2,287 consisted of cash of $1,830 and the delivery of 1,063,516 shares of LifeMed Media Inc. (“LifeMed”) valued at $457. The Company’s carrying value of these LifeMed shares was $27, thus the Company recorded a gain on the disposition of these shares of $430, which has been included in other income. On February 15, 2006, Source issued 15% of its membership interests to certain members of management. The purchase price for these membership interests was $1,540, which consisted of $385 cash and recourse notes in an aggregate principal amount equal to $1,155. In addition, the purchaser also received a fully vested option to purchase an additional 5% of Source at an exercise price equal to the price paid above. The option is exercisable any time prior to December 31, 2010. An amended and restated LLC agreement was entered into with these new members. The agreement also provides these members with an option to put to the Company these membership interests from December 2008-2012. As a result of the above transactions, the Company now owns 85% of Source. During the quarter ended March 31, 2006, the company recorded a non-cash stock based compensation charge of $2,338 relating to the price paid for the membership interests which was less than the fair value of such membership 53 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 4. Acquisitions – (continued) interests and the fair value of the option granted. On October 1, 2006, the options noted above were exercised. This exercise resulted in a dilution loss of $626 and reduced the Company’s ownership down to 80%. On July 1, 2006, the Company and Mono Advertising, LLC amended its operating agreement to eliminate certain limitations that the Company had on its ability to exercise control of Mono Advertising, LLC. Effective July 1, 2006 the Company has consolidated Mono Advertising, LLC which had previously been accounted for under the equity method. On July 27, 2006, the Company settled a put option obligation for a fixed amount equal to $1,492, relating to the purchase of 4.3% of additional equity interests of Accent Marketing, LLC. The settlement of this put was satisfied by a cash payment of $424, plus the cancellation of an outstanding promissory note to the Company in a principal amount equal to $1,068. The purchase price was allocated as follows: $403 to identified intangibles, amortized over eight years and the balance of $1,089 as additional goodwill. The goodwill and intangibles are deductible for tax purposes. Including this transaction, the Company now owns 93.7% of Accent Marketing, LLC. In August 2006, one of the entities in the Strategic Marketing Services segment closed an office on the West Coast. The Company incurred a charge to operations of $2,624 resulting primarily from lease termination costs and the write off of the related leasehold improvements. The liability is expected to be paid out over the next five years. On November 14, 2006, the Company purchased an additional 20% interest in Northstar Research Partners Inc. for $3,405 in cash. This transaction resulted in an allocation of the purchase price to goodwill of $2,989 and identifiable intangible assets of $415. The goodwill and intangibles are deductible for tax purposes. On November 14, 2006, the Company through its subsidiary Zig Inc. purchased a 65% interest in Hadrian’s Wall Advertising, LLC for $550. Hadrian’s Wall Advertising, LLC is a creative advertising firm that was acquired to facilitate the expansion of the Zig Canada business into the US market. In addition the Company purchased an additional 0.2% of Zig Inc. for cash of $18 and 30,000 of the Company’s Stock Appreciation Rights, valued at $104. The purchase price was allocated to goodwill of $18 and the value of the SAR’s was considered to be compensation expense and will be amortized over the vesting period of the SAR’s. Effective November 17, 2006, as a result of the additional share purchase, the Company has consolidated Zig Inc. which had previously been accounted for under the equity method. On December 15, 2006, the Company and Accumark Communications Group Inc. amended its operating agreement to eliminate certain minority rights. As a result of this amendment, effective December 15, 2006, the Company has consolidated Accumark Communications Inc. which had previously been accounted for under the equity method. 2005 Acquisitions Zyman Group On April 1, 2005, the Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, purchased approximately 61.6% of the total outstanding membership units of Zyman Group, LLC (“Zyman Group”) for purchase price consideration of $52,389 in cash and 1,139,975 Class A shares of the Company, valued at $11,257 based on the share price on or about the announcement date. Related transaction costs of approximately $977 were also incurred. In addition, the Company may be required to pay up to an additional $12,000 to the sellers if Zyman Group achieves specified financial targets for the twelve month period ending June 30, 2006 and/or June 30, 2007. For the year ending December 31, 2006, such financial targets were not achieved. In connection with the Zyman Group acquisition, the Company, Zyman Group and the other unitholders of Zyman Group entered into a new Limited Liability Company Agreement (the “LLC Agreement”). The LLC Agreement sets forth certain economic, governance and liquidity rights with respect to Zyman Group. Zyman Group 54 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 4. Acquisitions – (continued) initially has seven managers, four of whom were appointed by the Company. Pursuant to the LLC Agreement, the Company will have the right to purchase, and may have an obligation to purchase, for a combination of cash and shares, additional membership units of Zyman Group from the other members of Zyman Group, in each case, upon the occurrence of certain events or during certain specified time periods. The Zyman Group name is well recognized for strategic marketing consulting and as such was acquired by the Company for its assembled workforce to enhance the creative talent within the Company’s Strategic Marketing Service segment of businesses. The Zyman Group acquisition was accounted for as a purchase business combination. The purchase price of the net assets acquired in this transaction is $64,622. The final allocation of the cost of the acquisition to the fair value of net assets acquired and minority interests is as follows: Cash and cash equivalents Accounts receivable and other current assets Fixed assets and other assets Goodwill (tax deductible) Intangible assets Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities Total debt Minority interest at carrying value Total cost of the acquisition $ 5,653 6,734 7,785 45,349 20,143 (7,475) (8,524) (5,043) $64,622 Identifiable intangible assets of $20,143 are comprised primarily of customer relationships and related backlog and trademarks. The allocation of the purchase price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed is based upon estimates of fair values and certain assumptions that the Company believes are reasonable under the circumstances. The Company’s consolidated financial statements include Zyman Group’s results of operations subsequent to its acquisition on April 1, 2005. During the first five years following the Company’s acquisition of the Zyman Group, the Company’s allocation of profits of the Zyman Group may differ from its proportionate share of ownership. On an annual basis, the Company receives a 20% priority return calculated based on its total investment in Zyman Group. Thereafter, based on calculations set forth in the operating agreement of Zyman Group (the “LLC Agreement”), the Company’s share of remaining Zyman Group profits in excess of the annual “threshold” amount of $20,600 may be disproportionately less than its equity ownership in Zyman Group. Specifically, on an annual basis, if Zyman operating results exceed a defined operating margin, the Company would be entitled to 25% of the excess margins in the first two years of the LLC Agreement and 30% of the excess margins in the following three years of the LLC Agreement, rather than the Company’s equity portion of 61.6%. After the first five years, the earnings of the Zyman Group will be allocated in a proportion equal to the respective equity interests of the members. Based on the Company’s investment in the Zyman Group, at December 31, 2006, the annual priority return is expected to be equal to approximately $12,700, with the minority owners receiving the next $7,900 up to the threshold amount. If profits are insufficient to meet the Company’s priority return during any of the first five years, the Company will receive a catch-up payment through year five equal to any shortfall from the prior year(s). Furthermore, if profits do not reach the threshold amount during the first five years, the minority owners will be entitled to receive a catch-up payment through year five equal to any shortfall from the prior year(s). The short fall payments are subject to the actual results of operations and are not guaranteed payments. Based on Zyman Group’s results for 2006, the Company received less than its priority return from Zyman Group. 55 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 4. Acquisitions – (continued) Neuwirth On December 1, 2005, the Company, through its subsidiary Northstar Research Partners (USA) LLC (“NS LLC”), purchased the business of Neuwirth Research, Inc. (“Neuwirth”) for purchase price consideration of $450 in cash, a 20% equity interest in NS LLC valued at $225 based on the estimated market value of NS LLC on or about the announcement date, and 48,391 of the Company’s Class A shares valued at $300. Related transaction costs of approximately $100 were also incurred. In addition, the Company was required to pay up to an additional $625 in cash to the seller if the acquired Neuwirth business achieves specified financial targets for the year ended December 31, 2005 and/or December 31, 2006. As of March 31, 2006, the Company determined that these targets were achieved and, accordingly, the $625 payment obligation was settled by the Company’s issuance of 30,058 Class A shares stock valued at $250 and cash of $375. In connection with the Neuwirth acquisition, the Company and seller entered into agreements related to governance and certain put option rights with respect to the seller’s 20% equity interest in NS LLC which becomes 50% exercisable in 2010 and 100% exercisable in 2015. Neuwirth is a recognized market research firm and was acquired by the Company for its list of blue chip clients and synergies with NS LLC existing business. This acquisition is part of the Specialized Communications Services segment of businesses. The Neuwirth acquisition was accounted for as a purchase business combination. The allocation of the cost of the acquisition to the fair value of net assets acquired is as follows: Accounts receivable and other current assets Fixed assets and other assets Intangible assets Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities Total cost of the acquisition $ 492 50 1,680 (522) $1,700 Identifiable intangible assets, consisting of an employment agreement, estimated to be $1,680, are being amortized on a straight-line basis over ten years. The allocation of the purchase price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed is based upon estimates of fair values and certain assumptions that the Company believes are reasonable under the circumstances. The Company’s consolidated financial statements include Neuwirth’s results of operations subsequent to its acquisition on December 1, 2005. Powell On July 25, 2005, the Company, through its subsidiary Margeotes Fertitta Powell, LLC, (“MFP”) purchased the business of Powell, LLC (“Powell”) for purchase price consideration of $332 in cash and a 5% equity interest in MFP valued at $400 based on the estimated market value of MFP on or about the announcement date. The issuance of equity interests by MFP resulted in a loss of $103 on the dilution of the Company’s equity interest in its subsidiary. Related transaction costs of approximately $20 were also incurred. In addition, in August 2006, the Company paid an additional $300 in cash to the seller. In connection with the Powell acquisition, the Company and seller entered into agreements related to governance and certain put option rights with respect to seller’s 5% equity interest in MFP, which become exercisable in 2010. Powell is a well recognized, highly creative advertising agency and as such was acquired by the Company for its creative talent to supplement existing creative agencies within the Company’s Strategic Marketing Services segment of businesses. 56 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 4. Acquisitions – (continued) The Powell acquisition was accounted for as a purchase business combination. The allocation of the cost of the acquisition to the fair value of net assets acquired is as follows: Accounts receivable and other current assets Fixed assets and other assets Intangible assets Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities Total cost of the acquisition $ 32 31 1,130 (141) $ 1,052 Identifiable intangible assets, consisting of an employment agreement, estimated to be $1,130, are being amortized on a straight-line basis over five years. The allocation of the purchase price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed is based upon estimates of fair values and certain assumptions that the Company believes are reasonable under the circumstances. The Company’s consolidated financial statements include Powell’s results of operations subsequent to its acquisition on July 25, 2005. Other Acquisitions and Transactions On July 31, 2005, the Company acquired a further 20% equity interest in its existing subsidiary MFP pursuant to the exercise of a put obligation under the existing purchase agreement with a minority interest holder. The purchase price of $1,740 which includes $15 of acquisition costs was paid in cash. Of the purchase price, $500 was allocated to customer relationship intangible assets and $1,240 was allocated to goodwill. The allocation of the purchase price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed is based upon certain assumptions that the Company believes are reasonable under the circumstances. As a result of this acquisition, and the Powell transaction discussed above, the Company retains a 95% equity interest in MFP. On September 1, 2005, the Company, through a consolidated variable interest entity, Crispin Porter + Bogusky, LLC (“CPB”), purchased 20% of the total outstanding membership units of Fuse Project, LLC (“Fuseproject”) for purchase price consideration of $750 in cash and an additional $400, which was paid during the quarter ended March 31, 2006. Fuseproject is a design firm acquired by CPB to complement its creative offerings. The Fuseproject acquisition was accounted for using the equity method as CPB has significant influence over the operations of Fuseproject. The purchase price of the net assets acquired in this transaction is $1,150. The allocation of the cost of the acquisition to the fair value of the net assets acquired resulted in a portion being attributed to intangible assets valued at $40 and $1,090 consisting of goodwill. The allocation of the purchase price to assets acquired and liabilities assumed is based upon estimates of fair values and certain assumptions that the Company believes are reasonable under the circumstances. The Company’s consolidated financial statements include Fuseproject’s results of operations in equity in earnings of non-consolidated affiliates subsequent to its acquisition on September 1, 2005. During August 2005, Bryan Mills Group Ltd., (“BMG”) a subsidiary whose operations are consolidated by the Company, completed the acquisition of 450 shares from a minority shareholder at a price of $515.00 per share, for a total purchase price of $232. This resulted in the Company’s ownership interest in BMG increasing to 71.2% from 68.0%. Also as a result of the equity transaction by BMG, the Company recorded goodwill of $146. During the quarter ended March 31, 2005, the Company contributed $125 of cash as additional paid in capital to its existing consolidated subsidiary, Banjo Strategies Entertainment LLC. There was no change in the Company’s ownership interest. This resulted in a loss on dilution of $61 and is reflected in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations. During the quarter ended June 30, 2005, the Company acquired further equity interests in the existing consolidated subsidiaries of Allard Johnson Communications Inc. (0.3%) and Banjo Strategies Entertainment LLC (7.2%). In aggregate, the Company paid $143 in cash for these incremental ownership interests. During the quarter ended September 30, 2005, the Company acquired a further 0.7% equity interest in the existing consolidated subsidiary, Allard Johnson Communications Inc., for $148. 57 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 4. Acquisitions – (continued) 2004 Acquisitions kirshenbaum bond + partners, LLC (“KBP”) On January 29, 2004, the Company acquired a 60% ownership interest in KBP in a transaction accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. The Company paid $21,129 in cash, issued 148,719 shares of the Company’s common stock to the selling interestholders of KBP (valued at approximately $2,027 based on the share price on or about the announcement date), issued warrants to purchase 150,173 shares of the Company’s common stock to the selling interestholders of KBP (the fair value of which, using a Black—Scholes option pricing model, was approximately $955 based on the share price during the period on or about the announcement date) and incurred transaction costs of approximately $1,185. Under the terms of the agreement, the selling interestholders of KBP could receive additional cash and/or share consideration totaling an additional $735, based upon the achievement of certain pre-determined earnings targets. Effective December 31, 2004, this earnings contingency was resolved and the additional consideration of $735 and $47 in additional transaction costs incurred was recorded as goodwill. During the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as settlement of this obligation, $752 was paid in the form of 73,541 common shares of the Company, and $7 was paid in cash increasing the related goodwill by $24 in the same period. The recorded purchase price of the net assets acquired in the transaction was $26,031. The purchase price was allocated to the fair value of net assets acquired and minority interests as follows: Cash and cash equivalents Accounts receivable and other current assets Fixed assets and other assets Goodwill (tax deductible) Intangible assets Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities Minority interest at carrying value Total consideration $ 17,906 16,421 4,403 16,964 10,370 (39,372) (661) $ 26,031 Identifiable intangible assets of $10,370 are comprised primarily of customer relationships and trademarks. The Company’s consolidated financial statements include KBP’s results of operations subsequent to its acquisition on January 29, 2004. KBP is included in the Company’s Strategic Marketing Services segment. During the year ended December 31, 2004, the operations of KBP contributed $46,027 of revenue and $2,543 of income from continuing operations to the Company’s consolidated statement of operations. Accent Marketing Services On March 29, 2004, the Company acquired an additional 39.3% ownership interest in Accent Marketing Services LLC (“Accent”), increasing its total ownership interest in this subsidiary from 50.1% to approximately 89.4%. The Company paid $1,444 in cash, issued, (or will issue), 1,103,331 shares of the Company’s common stock to the selling interestholders of Accent (valued at approximately $16,833 based on the share price on or about the announcement date), and incurred transaction costs of approximately $99. The 2004 purchase price was allocated to the Company’s increased share of working capital and the fair value of the net assets acquired including acquired intangibles and goodwill. Specifically $10,074 was allocated to tax deductible goodwill, $3,688 was allocated to intangible assets comprised of customer relationships and internally developed software. This acquisition was accounted for as a purchase and accordingly, the Company’s consolidated financial statements, which have consolidated Accent’s financial results since 1999, reflect a further 39% ownership participation subsequent to the additional acquisition on March 29, 2004. 58 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 4. Acquisitions – (continued) Under the terms of the agreement, the selling interestholders of Accent could receive up to a maximum additional consideration of 742,642 common shares of the Company, or the cash equivalent at the option of the Company, based upon achievement of certain pre-determined earnings targets for the year ended March 31, 2005. Based on the calculation of these targets, during the second quarter of 2005 additional consideration of $2,485 was paid in the form of 280,970 common shares of the Company which has been accounted for as additional goodwill. During March 2006, the Company issued 266,856 common shares, which had been previously accounted for as shares to be issued. VitroRobertson On July 27, 2004, the Company acquired a 68% ownership interest in VitroRobertson Acquisition, LLC (“VR”) in a transaction accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. VR is located in San Diego, California, and is recognized for its expertise in brand market share management and has been included in the Company’s Strategic Marketing Services segment. The Company paid $7,009 in cash, issued 42,767 Class A shares of the Company’s common stock to the selling interestholders of VR (valued at approximately $473 based on the share price on the announcement date) and incurred transaction costs of approximately $122. Under the terms of the agreement, the selling interestholders of VR could receive additional cash consideration based upon achievement of certain pre- determined earnings targets to be measured at the end of 2005. Based on current earnings levels, no additional consideration is expected to be paid. Such contingent consideration will be accounted for as goodwill when the contingencies are resolved. Exclusive of the contingent consideration, the recorded purchase price of the net assets acquired in the transaction was $7,604. The purchase price was allocated to the fair value of net assets acquired and minority interest as follows: Cash and cash equivalents Accounts receivable and other current assets Fixed assets and other assets Goodwill (tax deductible) Intangible assets Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities Minority interest at carrying amount Total consideration $ 3,502 6,383 406 4,568 2,718 (9,823) (150) $ 7,604 Identifiable intangible assets of $2,718 are comprised primarily of customer relationships. The Company’s consolidated financial statements include VR’s results of operations subsequent to its acquisition on July 27, 2004. During the year ended December 31, 2004, the operations of VR contributed $3,744 of revenue and $372 of income from continuing operations to the Company’s consolidated statement of operations. Other Acquisitions and Transactions Third Quarter 2004 At August 31, 2004, the Company acquired a 49.9% ownership interest in Zig Inc (“Zig”) in a transaction accounted for under the equity method of accounting. Zig is a Toronto, Canada-based advertising agency internationally recognized for its unique creative abilities. Also during the third quarter of 2004, the Company acquired further equity interests in the existing subsidiary Fletcher Martin Ewing LLC, as well as several other insignificant investments. In aggregate, the Company paid $2,462 in cash, issued 125,628 Class A shares of the Company’s common stock to the selling interest holders (valued at approximately $1,507 based on the share price during the period on or about the date of closing and the announcement date) and incurred transaction costs of approximately $243. Under the terms of the Zig agreement, the selling interestholders were entitled to additional cash and share consideration totaling $624 based upon achievement of certain pre-determined earnings targets for 59 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 4. Acquisitions – (continued) 2004. Such contingent consideration was earned and has been accounted for as goodwill in 2004. The aggregate purchase price of the net assets acquired in these transactions was approximately $4,783. The purchase price was allocated to the net assets acquired. Specifically, $764 was allocated to goodwill, of which $739 is tax deductible, and $1,054 to intangible assets, $123 to other tangible assets and $2,842 to investment in affiliates. The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the results of operations and balance sheet, accounted for on a consolidated basis except for Zig, which is accounted for on an equity basis due to the significant influence of the management of the operation obtained through ownership interest and contractual rights. During this period, the incremental effect of the aggregated operations of these acquisitions contributed $147 of net income to the Company’s consolidated operating results. Second Quarter 2004 On April 14, 2004, the Company acquired a 65% ownership interest in henderson bas (“HB”) in a transaction accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. HB is a Toronto, Canada-based agency providing interactive and direct marketing advertising services and has been included in the Company’s Specialized Communications Services segment. On May 27, 2004, the Company acquired a 50.1% ownership interest in Bruce Mau Design Inc. (“BMD”) in a transaction accounted for under the purchase method of accounting. BMD is a Toronto, Canada-based design studio providing visual identity and branding such as environmental graphics, exhibition development and design and cultural and business programming services and has been included in the Company’s Specialized Communications Services segment. During the quarter ended June 30, 2004, the Company also acquired the following interests in three smaller agencies: a 49.9% interest in Mono Advertising LLC (“Mono”), a 51% interest in Hello Design, LLC (“Hello”) and a 51% interest in Banjo, LLC (“Banjo”), a variable interest entity in which the Company is the primary beneficiary. These transactions were all accounted for under the purchase method of accounting and are consolidated from the date of acquisition, with the exception of Mono, which is accounted for under the equity method. Hello and Banjo are included in the Company’s Specialized Communications Services segment. For these acquisitions in aggregate, the Company paid $3,843 in cash and will pay a further $351 in cash in 2006, has issued warrants to purchase 90,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to certain selling interestholders (valued at approximately $360 using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model assuming a 40% expected volatility, a risk free interest rate of 3.3% and an expected life of 3 years) and incurred transaction costs of approximately $349. Under the terms of the Mono, Hello Design, LLC, and BMD agreements, the selling interest holders could receive additional cash and/or share consideration after one to three years based on achievement of certain pre-determined cumulative earning targets. Based on current earning levels, the additional consideration for Hello Design, LLC and BMD would be $3,810. Such contingent consideration will be accounted for as goodwill when the contingency is resolved. At December 31, 2006, the Hello Design, LLC contingency has been resolved accordingly the amount determined of $2,721 has been recorded as deferred acquisition consideration. The aggregate purchase price of the net assets acquired in these transactions was approximately $4,903. The purchase price was allocated to the fair value of the net assets acquired. Specifically, $1,070 was allocated to goodwill, of which $1,014 is tax deductible, and $1,537 to intangible assets and $2,296 of other tangible assets. First Quarter 2004 In March 2004, the Company acquired a 19.9% ownership interest in Cliff Freeman + Partners LLC (“CF”) in a transaction accounted for under the equity method of accounting. CF is a New York based advertising agency recognized for its creative abilities. Also during the quarter ended March 31, 2004, the Company acquired further equity interests in the existing consolidated subsidiaries of Allard Johnson Communications Inc. (4.7%) and Targetcom LLC (20%), as well as several other insignificant investments. In aggregate, the Company paid $3,489 in cash and incurred transaction costs of approximately $213. Under the terms of the CF agreement, the selling 60 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 4. Acquisitions – (continued) interestholders could receive additional cash and/or share consideration after two years based upon achievement of certain pre-determined cumulative earnings targets. Based on current earnings levels, no additional consideration is expected to be paid. Such contingent consideration, if any, will be accounted for as goodwill when the contingency is resolved. Exclusive of future contingent consideration, the aggregate purchase price of the net assets acquired in these transactions was approximately $3,702. The purchase price was allocated based on the fair value of the net assets acquired. Of the purchase price, $2,141 was allocated to goodwill of which $1,242 is tax deductible, $306 to intangible assets, $472 to other tangible assets and $783 to investments in affiliates. Proforma Information The following unaudited pro forma results of operations of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 assume that the acquisition of the operating assets of the significant businesses acquired during 2005 and 2004 had occurred on January 1st of the respective year in which the business was acquired and for the comparable period. These unaudited pro forma results are not necessarily indicative of either the actual results of operations that would have been achieved had the companies been combined during these periods, or are they necessarily indicative of future results of operations. Year Ended December 31, 2005 Year Ended December 31, 2004 $ 377,748 $ 322,142 Revenues 181 $ Net income (loss) Earnings (loss) per common share: $ Basic – net income (loss) $ Diluted – net income (loss) (0.13) $ (0.13) $ (2,998) $ 0.01 0.01 5. Fixed Assets The following is a summary of the fixed assets as of December 31: 2006 Accumulated Depreciation Net Book Value Cost 2005 Accumulated Depreciation Net Book Value Cost Land Buildings Computers, furniture and fixtures Equipment Leasehold improvements $ — $ — 59,357 7,103 30,324 $ 96,784 — $ — (37,221) (2,643) (12,495) — $ — 22,136 4,460 17,829 $ (52,359) $ 44,425 176 $ 538 49,358 6,614 21,574 $ 78,260 $ — $ (261) (33,635) (1,451) (8,672) 176 277 15,723 5,163 12,902 (44,019) $ 34,241 Included in fixed assets are assets under capital lease obligations with a cost of $6,506 (2005—$5,288) and accumulated depreciation of $4,454 (2005—$3,302). Included in equipment is a plane acquired in the Zyman acquisition with a net book value of $4,218 at December 31, 2006. Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $12,589, $9,542 and $6,928, respectively. 6. Accrued and Other Liabilities At December 31, 2006 and 2005, accrued and other liabilities included amounts due to minority interest holders, for their share of profits, which will be distributed within the next twelve months of $11,129 and $11,295, respectively. 61 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 7. Financial Instruments Financial assets, which include cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable, have carrying values which approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these assets. Financial liabilities with carrying values approximating fair value due to short-term maturities include accounts payable, accrued and other liabilities, advance billings, and deferred acquisition consideration. Bank debt and long-term debt are variable rate debt, the carrying value of which approximates fair value. The Company’s convertible debt and note payable are fixed rate debt instruments, the carrying values of which approximates fair value. The fair value of financial commitments, guarantees and letters of credit, are based on the stated value of the underlying instruments. Guarantees have been issued in conjunction with the disposition of businesses in 2001 and 2003 and letters of credit have been issued in the normal course of business. 8. Variable Interest Entities In December 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities Revised” (“FIN 46R”), which addresses how a business enterprise should evaluate whether it has a controlling financial interest in an entity through means other than voting rights, and accordingly, whether it should consolidate the entity. The Company was required to apply FIN 46R to such variable interest entities (“VIEs”) commencing with the quarter ended March 31, 2004. In addition, the Company is required, upon the occurrence of certain triggering events, to reconsider whether an entity is a VIE. (i) The Company acquired a 49% voting interest in Crispin Porter + Bogusky, LLC (“CPB”), a marketing services business, in 2001 and accounted for its investment under the equity method of accounting until September 22, 2004. The equity carrying value of the investment in CPB as of June 30, 2004 was $18,110. Pursuant to the terms of the CPB Shareholders’ Agreement, the Company is entitled to 49% of earnings, plus an additional 8.5% of annual earnings in excess of $4,171. While CPB is a VIE, prior to September 22, 2004, the Company was not the primary beneficiary of its operations and thus, was not required to consolidate CPB under FIN 46R. Effective September 22, 2004, in connection with the refinancing of the Company’s bank credit facilities, the CPB Shareholders’ Agreement was amended to permit all of the assets of CPB to be pledged by the Company as security for its new bank credit facilities and in addition, earlier in the third quarter of 2004, certain of the other investors in CPB became officers of a subsidiary of the Company. As a result of these changes, the Company became the primary beneficiary of CPB and consolidated its operations under FIN 46R, commencing September 22, 2004. Under FIN 46R, for VIEs that must be consolidated, the assets, liabilities and minority interest of the VIE initially would be measured at their fair value as if the initial consolidation had resulted from a business combination on that date. Based on an independent valuation of the fair values of the assets, liabilities and non-controlling interests of CPB, the Company accounted for the following amounts in its balance sheet as at September 22, 2004 in connection with the consolidation of this VIE: Assets: Cash and cash equivalents Receivables and other current assets Goodwill Customer relationships and other intangible assets Other assets $ — 32,854 27,654 31,500 6,138 98,146 Liabilities: Accounts payable and other current liabilities Advance billings Other liabilities Minority Interest Net investment 17,542 18,205 1,579 43,285 80,611 $17,535 62 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 8. Variable Interest Entities – (continued) Upon consolidation, the Company eliminated its previously recorded investment in affiliate. The liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating CPB do not represent additional claims on the Company’s general assets, rather, they represent claims against the specific assets of the VIE. While assets recognized as a result of consolidating CPB do not represent additional assets that could be used to satisfy claims against the Company’s general assets, as a result of the amendments to the CPB Shareholders’ Agreement and the Company’s bank credit facility entered into September 22, 2004, the assets recognized have been pledged as security for the Company’s borrowings under its bank credit facilities. Summary financial information for CPB for the years ended 2006 and 2005 are as follows: Revenue – services $86,351 $54,690 $11,402 Operating profit $93,169 Total assets $15,098 $96,556 2006 2005 (ii) Based upon a review of the provisions of FIN 46R, the Company has identified Banjo, a business in which the Company acquired a majority voting interest in the second quarter of 2004, as a variable interest entity, for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. In 2004, the Company also identified an investee (LifeMed Media Inc.) in which the Company had a 45% investment as a variable interest entity for which the Company was the primary beneficiary, thereby requiring consolidation. Through December 31, 2004, the Company funded $1.5 million to this start-up venture to finance the development of proprietary content-driven marketing material. The venture, which commenced operations in the second quarter of 2004, had no significant assets or liabilities and no revenues, and amounts expended by the venture have been principally in respect of salaries and related costs, and general and other operating costs. In July 2005, the Company’s ownership interest was reduced to 18.3% and the Company ceased consolidation of this investee. In February 2006, the Company exchanged shares in LifeMed in partial settlement of a put obligation relating to Source. This reduced the Company’s ownership to 13.2%, which such ownership was further reduced in a subsequent transaction by LifeMed. The Company’s current ownership in LifeMed is 5.8% (See Note 4). See Note 11 “Discontinued Operations”. (iii) In addition the Company has identified Trapeze Media Limited as a variable interest entity, however the Company is not the primary beneficiary and Trapeze is therefore not consolidated. To date, the results of operations of Trapeze have not been material to the Company’s consolidated financial statements. See Note 17(c). 63 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 9. Goodwill and Intangible Assets As of December 31, the gross and net amounts of acquired intangible assets were as follows: 2006 2005 Goodwill: Beginning of the year Acquired goodwill Reduction for disposition $ 195,026 $146,494 49,009 (50) 15,838 (1,037) Goodwill impairment Foreign currency translation Balance end of the year Intangibles: Trademarks (indefinite lived) Customer relationships – gross Less accumulated amortization Customer relationships – net Other intangibles – gross Less accumulated amortization Other intangibles – net Total intangible assets Less accumulated amortization Total intangible assets – net (5,984) (150) $ 203,693 (473) 46 $195,026 $ 17,780 $ 41,455 (17,494) $ 23,961 $ 17,887 (10,695) $ 7,192 $ 77,122 (28,189) $ 48,933 $ 17,780 $ 39,767 (9,808) $ 29,959 $ 16,326 (6,926) $ 9,400 $ 73,873 (16,734) $ 57,139 In accordance with the Company’s accounting policy, the Company completed its annual impairment test of goodwill and intangible assets. As a result of this review, in 2006, the Company recorded an impairment charge related to goodwill of $5,984 and intangible assets of $322 in the Specialized Communication Services segment. In addition, the Company recognized a loss in connection with an equity transaction of one of its consolidated subsidiaries and reduced the carrying value of its goodwill related to the subsidiary by $1,037. During the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company recorded an impairment charge related to goodwill of the Specialized Communication Services segment of $473. There was no goodwill impairment charge in 2004. The weighted average amortization periods for customer relationships and other intangible assets are 6 years and 7 years, respectively, and 6 years in total. The amortization expense of amortizable intangible assets for the year ended December 31, 2006, was $11,471 (2005 - $13,592; 2004 - $3,145) before tax and the estimated amortization expense for the five succeeding years before tax, per year is: Year Amortization 2007 $ $ 2008 $ 2009 $ 2010 $ 2011 8,738 8,661 7,898 1,876 1,201 64 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 10. Income Taxes The components of the Company’s income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes, equity in affiliates and minority interests by taxing jurisdiction for the years ended December 31, were: 2006 2005 2004 Income (loss): US Non-US $2,358 $19,377 $ 2,441 10,290 (6,334) 1,920 $4,278 $13,043 $12,731 The provision (benefit) for income taxes by taxing jurisdiction for the years ended December 31, were: 2006 2005 1004 Current tax provision US federal US state and local Non-US Deferred tax provision (benefit): US federal US state and local Non-US Income tax provision $ — $ — $ 1,523 740 2,263 1,331 1,883 3,214 1,924 (1,777) 151 298 (2,345) 779 688 (878) $ 2,561 $ 2,336 $ (18) 1,119 2,018 3,119 (1,700) (227) (617) (2,544) 575 A reconciliation of income tax expense using the statutory Canadian federal and provincial income tax rate compared with actual income tax expense for the years ended December 31, is as follows: Income from continuing operations before income taxes, equity in affiliates and minority interest Statutory income tax rate Tax expense using statutory income tax rate Other taxes Non-deductible stock-based compensation Other non-deductible expense Change to valuation allowance on items affecting taxable income Non-taxable income and gains Minority interests Change in enacted tax rates Other, net Income tax expense Effective income tax rate 2006 2005 2004 $ 4,278 $ 13,043 $12,731 36.12% 36.12% 36.12% 4,598 4,711 1,545 1,487 2,274 380 3,129 1,182 3,017 590 540 407 915 943 3,038 — — (8,115) (7,655) (3,178) (6,035) 324 — — 825 341 209 575 $ 2,336 $ $ 2,561 4.5% 17.9% 59.9% 65 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 10. Income Taxes – (continued) Income taxes receivable were $263 and $213 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and were included in accounts receivable on the balance sheet. Income taxes payable were $2,629 and $2,139 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and were included in accrued and other liabilities on the balance sheet. It is the Company’s policy to classify interest and penalties arising in connection with the under payment of income taxes as a component of income tax expense. For the years ended 2006, 2005 and 2004, income tax expense does not include any amounts for interest and penalties. The tax effects of significant temporary differences representing deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, were as follows: 2006 2005 Deferred tax assets: Capital assets and other Net operating loss carry forwards Goodwill amortization Interest deductions Share issue costs Capital loss carry forwards Accounting reserves Gross deferred tax asset Less: valuation allowance Net deferred tax assets $ 1,709 $ 2,370 37,005 1,480 8,026 1,041 10,880 3,088 63,890 (44,721) 19,169 61,472 1,281 7,492 182 10,827 4,416 87,379 (65,790) 21,589 Deferred tax liabilities: Capital assets and other Deferred finance charges Goodwill amortization Total deferred tax liabilities Net deferred tax asset Disclosed as: Deferred tax assets Deferred tax liabilities (3,192) (553) (5,744) (9,489) (2,185) (764) (2,768) (5,717) $ 12,100 $ 13,452 $ 13,332 (1,232) 16,057 (2,605) $ 12,100 $ 13,452 Included in accrued and other liabilities at December 31, 2006 and 2005 is a deferred tax liability of $92 and $159, respectively. Included in assets held for sale at December 31, 2005 is a deferred tax asset of $1,550. The Company has US federal net operating loss carry forwards of $20,025 and non-US net operating loss carry forwards of $67,084, these carry forwards expire in years 2007 through 2026. The Company also has total indefinite loss carry forwards of $51,776. These indefinite loss carry forwards consist of $21,654 relating to the US and $30,122 which are related to capital losses from the Canadian operations. In addition, the Company has net operating loss carry forwards for various state taxing jurisdictions of approximately $62,757. The Company records a valuation allowance against deferred income tax assets when management believes it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized. Management considers factors such as the reversal of deferred income tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, the character of the income tax asset; tax planning strategies, changes in tax laws and other factors. A change to these factors could impact the estimated valuation allowance and income tax expense. 66 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 10. Income Taxes – (continued) The valuation allowance has been recorded to reduce our deferred tax asset to an amount that is more likely than not to be realized, and is based upon the uncertainty of the realization of certain non-US and state deferred tax assets. The increase in the Company’s valuation allowance charged to the statement of operations for each of the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004 was $3,038, $943 and $915, respectively. Deferred taxes are not provided for temporary differences representing earnings of non-Canadian subsidiaries that are intended to be permanently reinvested. The potential deferred tax liability associated with these undistributed earnings is not material. 11. Discontinued Operations In June 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors made the decision to sell or otherwise divest the Company’s Secure Paper Businesses and Secure Card Businesses (collectively, Secured Products International or “SPI”). On November 14, 2006, the Company completed its sale of SPI, resulting in net proceeds of $27,000. Consideration was received in the form of cash of $20,000 and five additional annual payments of $1,000. In addition, the Company received a 7.5% equity interest in the newly formed entity acquiring SPI. The Company has recorded the present value of the five additional payments of $3,724 as Other Assets. Also included in Other Assets is the estimated value of the 7.5% equity interest received of $1,924. During 2006, the Company had previously recorded an impairment charge of $19,498 relating to SPI’s long lived assets to adjust them to fair market value. The sale of SPI has resulted in a gain of $2,856 ($1,824, net of taxes). The results of operations of SPI for 2006 and 2004 were losses of $21,569 and $1,581, respectively. During 2005, the results of operations of SPI was income of $561. Based on the net proceeds and average borrowing rate for each period, the Company has allocated interest expense to discontinued operations of $1,393, $1,096 and $1,074 for the years ended 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. During July 2005, LifeMed Media, Inc., (“LifeMed”) a variable interest entity whose operations had been consolidated by the Company, completed a private placement issuing approximately 12.5 million shares at a price of $0.4973 per share. LifeMed received net proceeds of approximately $6,200. Consequently, the Company’s ownership interest in LifeMed was reduced to 18.3% from this transaction. As a result of the equity transaction of LifeMed, the Company recorded a gain of $1,300. This gain represents the Company’s reversal of a liability related to funding obligations that the Company is no longer obligated to fund. The Company no longer has any significant continuing involvement in the management or operations of LifeMed, and has not participated in the purchase of significant new equity offerings of LifeMed. Consequently, as of July 2005, the Company no longer consolidates the operations of LifeMed, commenced accounting for its remaining investment in LifeMed on a cost basis, and has reported the results of operations of LifeMed as discontinued operations for all periods presented. In February 2006, the Company sold 27% of its remaining ownership in LifeMed as partial settlement of a put obligation. In November 2004, the Company’s management reached a decision to discontinue the operations of a component of its business. This component is comprised of the Company’s UK based marketing communications business, a wholly owned subsidiary Mr. Smith Agency, Ltd. (formerly known as Interfocus Networks Limited). The Company decided to dispose of the operations of this business due to its unfavorable economics. Substantially all of the net assets of the discontinued business were sold during the fourth quarter of 2004 with the disposition of all activities of Mr. Smith and remaining sale of assets was substantially complete by the end of the first quarter of 2005. No significant one-time termination benefits were incurred or are expected to be incurred. No further significant other charges are expected to be incurred. 67 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 11. Discontinued Operations – (continued) Included in discontinued operations in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31 were the following: Years Ended December 31, 2005 2006 2004 Revenue Impairment charge Operating income (loss) $ 67,405 $ 83,039 $ 73,472 19,498 — $ (7,897) — $ (17,911) $ 1,524 Other income (expense) Income taxes (expense) recovery Minority interest recovery Net income (loss) from discontinued operations 795 (1,600) — (939) 289 260 $ (18,716) $ 1,134 (1,704) 332 540 $ (8,729) As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, Other Assets includes $73 and $100 respectively, of the Company’s net investment in LifeMed. As of December 31, 2005 the carrying value on the Company’s balance sheet of the assets and liabilities to be disposed were as follows: December 31, 2005 $ $ $ $ 16,198 10,206 775 29,287 2,551 59,017 6,470 3,219 5,031 3,830 18,550 Assets held for sale: Accounts receivable Inventories Other current assets Fixed Assets Other long-term assets Total assets Liabilities related to assets held for sale: Accounts payable and other current liabilities Accrued and other liabilities Advance billings Long term debt Total liabilities There are no assets or liabilities held for sale as of December 31, 2006. 68 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 12. Comprehensive Income (Loss) Total comprehensive income (loss) and its components for the years ended December 31, were: 2006 2005 2004 Net loss for the year Foreign currency cumulative translation adjustment Comprehensive income (loss) for the year $(33,539) $(7,949) $ (2,157) 4,778 $(35,749) $(8,130) $ 2,621 (2,210) (181) 13. Bank Debt, Long-Term Debt and Convertible Notes At December 31, the Company’s indebtedness was comprised as follows: 2006 2005 Short term debt Revolving credit facility 8% convertible debentures Note payable and other bank loans Obligations under capital leases Less: Short term debt Revolving credit facility Current portion $ 4,910 $ 3,739 73,500 38,694 5,650 121,583 1,566 123,149 45,000 38,613 5,206 93,729 1,725 95,454 4,910 45,000 1,177 3,739 73,500 1,645 $44,367 $ 44,265 Interest expense related to long-term debt for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 was $9,065, $6,517 and $4,896, respectively. The amortization of deferred finance costs included in interest expense were $2,213, $1,305 and $2,370 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively. Short term debt represents the swing line under the revolving credit facility and outstanding checks at the end of the reporting period. MDC Revolving Credit Facility On June 10, 2004, MDC Partners Inc. entered into a revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks providing for borrowings of up to C$25,000 ($18,700) maturing in May of 2005. It was extinguished and replaced in September 2004. On September 22, 2004, MDC Partners Inc. and certain of its wholly-owned subsidiaries entered into a revolving credit facility with a syndicate of banks providing for borrowings of up to $100,000 (including swing-line advances of up to $10,000) maturing in September 2007 (the “Credit Facility”). At December 31, 2006, the maximum borrowing under the facility is $96,500, a reduction of $3,500 due to the sale of SPI. This facility bears interest at variable rates based upon the Eurodollar rate, US bank prime rate, US base rate, and Canadian bank prime rate, at the Company’s option. Based on the level of debt relative to certain operating results, the interest rates on loans are calculated by adding between 200 and 325 basis points on Eurodollar and Bankers Acceptance based interest rate loans, and between 50 and 175 basis points on all other loan interest rates. The provisions of the facility contain various covenants pertaining to a minimum ratio of debt to net income before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), a maximum debt to capitalization ratio, the maintenance of certain 69 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 13. Bank Debt, Long-Term Debt and Convertible Notes – (continued) liquidity levels and minimum shareholders’ equity levels. The facility restricts, among other things, the levels of capital expenditures, investments, distributions, dispositions and incurrence of other debt. The facility is secured by a senior pledge of the Company’s assets principally comprised of ownership interests in its subsidiaries and by a substantial portion of the underlying assets of the businesses comprising the Company’s Marketing Communications Group, the underlying assets being carried at a value represented by the total assets reflected on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2006. At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the aggregate amount of swing line advances, plus outstanding checks (disclosed as “Bank debt” in Current Liabilities on the balance sheet) was $4,910 and $3,739, respectively. At December 31, 2006, the unused portion of the total facility was $47,647. The Company has classified the swing-line component of this revolving credit facility as a current liability in accordance with EITF 95 22, “Balance Sheet Classification of Borrowings Outstanding under Revolving Credit Agreements that include both a Subjective Acceleration Clause and a Lock-Box Agreement”. This component, reflected as bank debt on the balance sheet, is classified as a current liability in accordance with EITF 95 22 since the swing-line contains a lock box arrangement that requires the cash receipts of the Company to be used to repay amounts outstanding under the swing-line and the entire credit facility is subject to subjective acceleration clauses. Management believes that no conditions have occurred that would result in subjective acceleration by the lenders, nor do they believe that any such conditions will exist over the next twelve months. The weighted average interest rate on these current portions of debt was 8.13% and 6.7% as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Since securing the Credit Facility on September 22, 2004, the Credit Facility has been amended as follows: (a) On December 22, 2004 and March 14, 2005, the Company amended certain of the terms and conditions of the revolving credit facility (“Credit Facility”). Pursuant to such amendments, the lenders under the Credit Facility agreed, among other things, to (i) extend the due date for the Company to deliver to the lenders its annual financial statements; (ii) amend the pricing grid; (iii) modify the Company’s total debt ratio, fixed charge ratio and capital expenditures covenants; and (iv) waive any potential default that may have occurred as a result of the Company’s failure to comply with its total debt ratio and fixed charge coverage ratio covenants. This amendment was necessary in order to avoid an event of default under the Credit Facility and to permit the Company to continue to borrow under the Credit Facility. (b) On March 31, 2005, the Company received a limited waiver from the lenders under its Credit Facility, pursuant to which the lenders agreed to give the Company until April 15, 2005 to deliver its financial statements for the quarter and year ended December 31, 2004. (c) In order to finance the Zyman Group acquisition (see Note 4), the Company entered into an amendment to its Credit Facility on April 1, 2005. This amendment provided for, among other things, (i) an increase in the total revolving commitments available under the Credit Facility from $100,000 to $150,000, (ii) permission to consummate the Zyman Group acquisition, (iii) mandatory reductions of the total revolving commitments by $25,000 on June 30, 2005, $5,000 on September 30, 2005, $10,000 on December 31, 2005 and $10,000 on March 31, 2006, (iv) reduced flexibility to consummate acquisitions going forward and (v) modification to the fixed charges ratio and total debt ratio financial covenants retroactive to March 31, 2005. (d) On May 9, 2005, the Company further amended the terms of its Credit Facility. Pursuant to such amendment, among other things, the lenders (i) modified the Company’s total debt ratio covenant; and (ii) waived the default that occurred as a result of the Company’s failure to comply with its total debt ratio covenant solely with respect to the period ended March 31, 2005. (e) On June 6, 2005, the Company further amended its Credit Facility to permit the issuance of 8% convertible unsecured subordinated debentures (see below). In addition, pursuant to this amendment, the lenders (i) modified the definition of ‘‘Total Debt Ratio’’ to exclude the 8% convertible unsecured 70 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 13. Bank Debt, Long-Term Debt and Convertible Notes – (continued) subordinated debentures from such definition, (ii) required a reduction of the revolving commitments under the Credit Facility from $150,000 to $116,200 effective June 28, 2005, the reduction being equal to the net proceeds received by the Company from the issuance of these debentures, (iii) imposed certain restrictions on the ability of the Company to amend the documentation governing the debentures, and (iv) modified the Company’s fixed charges ratio covenant, effective upon issuance of these debentures. (f) On October 31, 2005, the Company further amended its Credit Facility. Pursuant to such amendment, among other things, the lenders (i) reduced the revolving commitments under the Credit Facility to $105,000, effective as of the date of the amendment, with a further reduction of $5,000 on December 31, 2005; (ii) modified the Company’s “total debt ratio” and “fixed charges ratio” covenants; (iii) effective April 15, 2006, added a 1.0% per annum facility fee on the amount of the revolving commitments under the Credit Facility in excess of $65,000, which fee will be payable beginning on April 15, 2006 and for so long as the revolving commitments under the Credit Facility are in excess of $65,000; and (iv) waived the default that may have occurred as a result of the Company’s failure to comply with its total debt ratio covenant and fixed charges covenant with respect to the test period ending September 30, 2005. In addition, in the event of a sale of the Company’s secure products business, the Company must repay advances under the Credit Facility by an amount equal to the net proceeds received by the Company from such sale (“Sale Net Proceeds”), and the revolving commitments under the facility would be reduced by an amount equal to the Sale Net Proceeds. (g) On January 17, 2006, the Company further amended its Credit Facility. Pursuant to such amendment, the lenders agreed to permit the Company to continue to fund capital contributions to an investment to which the Company had a contractual commitment, in an aggregate amount not exceeding $700. (h) On November 3, 2006, the Company amended its Credit Facility. Pursuant to such amendment, among other things, the lenders (i) amended the “net worth” financial covenant to include an addition for any losses on sale or non-cash impairment charges recorded in connection with the disposition of the Secure Products International (“SPI”) business; (ii) reduced the commitment reduction requirement based upon net cash proceeds received from the sale of SPI in excess of $12,500; and (iii) modified the Company’s “total debt ratio” covenant. The Company is currently in compliance with all of the terms and conditions of its amended Credit Facility and management believes that, based on its current financial projections, the Company will be in compliance with its financial covenants over the next twelve months. As at December 31, 2006, $2,265 (2005—$5,336) of the consolidated cash position is held by subsidiaries, which, although available for the subsidiaries’ use, does not represent cash that is available for use to reduce MDC Partners Inc. indebtedness. 8% Convertible Unsecured Subordinated Debentures On June 28, 2005, the Company completed an offering in Canada of convertible unsecured subordinated debentures amounting to $36,723 (C$45,000) (the “Debentures”). The Debentures will mature on June 30, 2010. The Debentures will bear interest at an annual rate of 8.00% payable semi-annually, in arrears, on June 30 and December 31 of each year, commencing December 31, 2005. Unless an event of default has occurred and is continuing, the Company may elect, from time to time, subject to applicable regulatory approval, to issue and deliver Class A subordinate voting shares to the Debenture trustee in order to raise funds to satisfy all or any part of the Company’s obligations to pay interest on the Debentures in accordance with the indenture in which holders of the Debentures will be entitled to receive a cash payment equal to the interest payable from the proceeds of the sale of such Class A subordinate voting shares by the Debenture trustee. 71 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 13. Bank Debt, Long-Term Debt and Convertible Notes – (continued) The Debentures are convertible at the holder’s option into fully-paid, non-assessable and freely tradeable Class A subordinate voting shares of the Company, at any time prior to maturity or redemption, subject to the restrictions on transfer, at a conversion price of $12.01 (C$14.00) per Class A subordinate voting share being a ratio of approximately 71.4286 Class A subordinate voting shares per $816.00 (C$1,000.00) principal amount of Debentures. The Debentures may not be redeemed by the Company on or before June 30, 2008. Thereafter, but prior to June 30, 2009, the Debentures may be redeemed, in whole or in part from time to time, at a price equal to the principal amount of the Debenture plus accrued and unpaid interest, provided that the volume weighted average trading price of the Class A subordinate voting shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange during a specified period is not less than 125% of the conversion price. From July 1, 2009 until the maturity of the Debentures the Debentures may be redeemed by the Company at a price equal to the principal amount of the Debenture plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. The Company may elect to satisfy the redemption consideration, in whole or in part, by issuing Class A subordinate voting shares of the Company to the holders, the number of which will be determined by dividing the principal amount of the Debenture by 95% of the current market price of the Class A subordinate voting shares on the redemption date. Upon the occurrence of a change of control of the Company involving the acquisition of voting control or direction over 50% or more of the outstanding Class A subordinate voting shares prior to June 30, 2008, the Company shall be required to make an offer to purchase all of the then outstanding Debentures at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof plus an amount equal to the interest payments not yet received on the Debentures calculated from the date of the change of control to June 30, 2008, discounted at a specified rate. Upon the occurrence of a change of control on or after June 30, 2008, the Company shall be required to make an offer to purchase all of the then outstanding Debentures at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the Debentures plus accrued and unpaid interest to the purchase date. In connection with the Zyman acquisition, the Company assumed the following note payable in the original amount of $6,275. The note bears interest of 5.73% and is due on June 8, 2009. The balance of the note payable was $5,100 at December 31, 2006. The note agreement is secured by an aircraft and related equipment with a net book value of $4,218 at December 31, 2006. Future principal repayments, including capital lease obligations, for the years ended December 31, and in aggregate are as follows: Period Amount 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 and thereafter $51,087 1,100 4,332 38,784 145 6 $95,454 72 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 13. Bank Debt, Long-Term Debt and Convertible Notes – (continued) Capital Leases Future minimum capital lease payments for the years ended December 31 and in aggregate are as follows: Period 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 and thereafter Less: imputed interest Amount $ 757 516 360 191 154 6 1,984 (259) 1,725 (643) $ 1,082 Less: current portion 14. Share Capital The authorized share capital of the Company is as follows: (a) Authorized Share Capital Class A Shares An unlimited number, subordinate voting shares, carrying one vote each, entitled to dividends equal to or greater than Class B shares, convertible at the option of the holder into one Class B share for each Class A share after the occurrence of certain events related to an offer to purchase all Class B shares. Class B Shares An unlimited number, carrying 20 votes each, convertible at any time at the option of the holder into one Class A share for each Class B share. Preference Shares An unlimited number, non-voting, issuable in series. The Company has not paid dividends on any class of shares during the three years ended December 31, 2006. (b) 2006 Share Capital Transactions During the year ended December 31, 2006, Class A share capital increased by $6,188, as the Company issued 345,305 shares related to business acquisitions and 130,244 shares related to the exercise of stock options and stock appreciation rights. In addition, during 2006, 10,358 Class A Shares were issued in connection with the 2003 privatization of Maxxcom. As of December 31, 2006, 30,954 Class A Shares remain to be issued upon the presentation of the Maxxcom shares which, based on the privatization of this subsidiary in 2003, were exchanged into the Company’s Class A shares. Certain option prices have been retroactively corrected to comply with provisions in the option plan. As a result, the Company has recorded a stock subscription receivable of $674, included in shareholders equity. 73 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 14. Share Capital – (continued) (c) 2005 Share Capital Transactions During the year ended December 31, 2005, Class A share capital increased by $14,825, as the Company issued 1,494,486 shares related to business acquisitions and 5,258 shares related to the exercise of stock options. (d) 2004 Share Capital Transactions During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company acquired and cancelled, pursuant to a normal course issuer bid, 1,070,000 Class A subordinate voting shares for $12,476. The premium paid on the repurchase of the Class A subordinate voting shares, in the amount of $3,757, was charged to accumulated deficit. During the third quarter, the Company issued 90,164 Class A subordinate voting shares for nil proceeds as additional consideration related to the maintenance of the market value of the same securities issued as purchase consideration for an acquisition completed in the first quarter of 2004. Including these 90,164 shares, 1,243,753 Class A subordinate voting shares were issued during 2004 as purchase consideration for acquisitions. On May 5, 2004, the Company settled in full the $34,919 (C$48,000) of 7% Convertible Notes with the issuance of 2,582,027 Class A subordinate voting shares. On March 17, 2004, the Company completed a private placement issuing 120,919 shares at an average price of $11.65 per share and issued 120,919 warrants with exercise prices ranging from C$15.72 to C$19.13 and expiring in March 2009. The Company undertook the private placement as a means to provide the Company’s Board of Directors, Board of Advisors and potential Board members the ability to increase their share holdings in the Company in order to further align their interests with those of the Company. As a result of the offering, a stock- based compensation charge in the amount of $1.0 million was taken in the first quarter to account for the fair value of the benefits conveyed to the recipients of the awards on the granting of warrants and the issuing of shares at a price less than the trading value on the day of issuance. On February 26, 2004 the Company’s then controlling shareholder, Miles S. Nadal (the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer) gave formal notice to the Company’s Board of Directors that he had initiated the process to effect conversion of 100% of his Class B multiple voting shares into Class A subordinate voting shares on a one-for-one basis, without any cash or non-cash consideration. The conversion was completed during the first quarter of 2004. Mr. Nadal’s equity interest in the Company prior to the conversion was approximately 20.2%, and he controlled 44.9% of the voting rights attached to the corporation. Prior to the conversion Mr. Nadal owned 447,968 Class B multiple voting shares, which represented 99% of the Class B shares and carry 20 votes per share, in addition to 3,400,351 Class A subordinate voting shares, which carry one vote per share. After the conversion, both Mr. Nadal’s equity interest and voting interest in the Company were approximately 20.2%, or 3,848,319 Class A subordinate voting shares. As of March 1, 2006, Mr. Nadal beneficially owed 1,832,311 Class A subordinate voting shares or 7.8%. (e) Employee Stock Incentive Plan On May 26, 2005, the Company’s shareholders approved the Company’s 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2005 Incentive Plan”). The 2005 Incentive Plan authorizes the issuance of awards to employees, officers, directors and consultants of the Company with respect to 2,000,000 shares of MDC Partners’ Class A Subordinate Voting Shares or any other security in to which such shares shall be exchanged. As of December 31, 2006, the Company has granted 150,000 Director options, which option grants were for a ten-year term and vests over five (5) years from the grant date under this plan. In February 2006, the Company also granted under this plan, 263,500 financial performance-based restricted stock awards and 533,000 financial performance-based restricted stock units (of which 2,500 restricted stock awards and 5,000 restricted stock units were forfeited). None of these awards vested during the year and as such all remain non vested at the end of year. The term of these awards is three years, with vesting up to three years. 74 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 14. Share Capital – (continued) The Company’s Board of Directors adopted the 2005 Incentive Plan as a replacement for MDC Partners’ Amended and Restated Stock Option Incentive Plan (the “Prior 2003 Plan”). Following approval of the 2005 Incentive Plan, the Company ceased making awards under the Prior 2003 Plan. Prior to adoption of the 2005 Incentive Plan, the Company’s Prior 2003 Plan provided for grants of up to 1,890,786 options to employees, officers, directors and consultants of the Company. All the options granted were for a term of five years from the date of the grant and vest 20% on the date of grant and a further 20% on each anniversary date. In addition, the Company granted 534,960 options, on the privatization of Maxxcom, with a term of no more than 10 years from initial date of grant by Maxxcom and vest 20% in each of the first two years with the balance vesting on the third anniversary of the initial grant. Information related to share option transactions over the past three years is summarized as follows: Balance, December 31, 2003 Granted Exercised Expired and cancelled Balance, December 31, 2004 Granted Exercised Expired and cancelled Balance, December 31, 2005 Vested Granted Exercised Expired and cancelled Balance, December 31, 2006 Options Outstanding Options Exercisable Number Outstanding Weighted Average Price Per Share Number Outstanding Weighted Average Price Per Share Non Vested Options 2,076,728 $ 6.60 872,979 $ 7.82 169,052 (241,755) (119,410) 1,884,615 25,000 (5,258) (111,153) 1,793,204 — 125,000 (30,400) (154,724) 1,733,080 $ 11.01 9.32 12.08 6.78 6.89 5.87 10.29 6.79 — 8.95 4.92 7.96 8.57 979,900 6.65 1,241,773 6.41 1,369,056 $ 8.25 551,431 (304,407) 125,000 — (8,000) 364,024 At December 31, 2006, the intrinsic value of vested options was $427. For options exercised during 2006, the Company received cash proceeds of $146. The Company did not receive any windfall tax benefits. The intrinsic value of options exercised during 2006 was $119. Share options outstanding as of December 31, 2006 are summarized as follows: Range of Exercise Prices Options Outstanding Weighted Average Contractual Life Weighted Average Price Per Share Outstanding Number Options Exercisable Weighted Average Price Per Share Weighted Average Contractual Life Exercisable Number $4.37–$6.75 $6.76–$7.89 $7.90–$9.15 $9.16 –$13.47 $13.48 – $48.42 34,935 783,355 618,400 289,721 6,669 4.74 1.65 $ 6.97 $ 1.30 $ 2.07 8.98 $ 12.07 2.49 $ 26.12 4.46 34,935 $ 4.74 763,355 394,600 171,402 4,764 $ 6.97 $ 9.13 $ 12.06 $ 29.69 1.65 1.23 1.50 2.52 5.35 (f) Stock Appreciation Rights During 2003, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved a stock appreciation rights (“SAR’s”) compensation program for senior officers and directors of the Company. SARS’s granted prior to 2006 have a term of four years, for SAR’s granted in 2006 and after they have a term of up to 10 years and all awards vest one-third on each anniversary date. During the year ended December 31, 2003, 1,650,479 SAR’s were granted with 75 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 14. Share Capital – (continued) rights prices ranging from $3.85 to $7.71 with an average price of $5.76. In 2003, the Company recorded compensation expense of $4,102 with respect to SAR’s. During the second quarter of 2004, the Company amended its SAR plan to amend the method of settlement from cash exclusively to cash or equity settlement at the option of the Company. The amendment caused the existing SAR awards to be modified, triggering a remeasurement date for accounting purposes. The modification is accounted for as a settlement of the old awards through the issuance of new awards. As a result, the Company measured the settlement value of the SARs immediately prior to the modification date and adjusted the previously accumulated amortized expense and liability based on the revised calculation. The settlement value of $6,142 was reclassed from accounts payable and accrued liabilities to additional paid-in capital. The Company then measured the fair value of the equity settleable SAR awards using the Black-Scholes option pricing model on the date of modification. The excess of the fair value calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model over the settlement value of $5,046 will be accounted for as additional compensation expense over the remaining vesting period of the SAR awards. SAR’s granted and outstanding are as follows: SAR’s Outstanding SAR’s Exercisable Weighted Average Number Outstanding Weighted Average Price Per Share Number Outstanding Price Per Share Non Vested SAR’s Balance at December 31, 2003 1,650,479 $ 5.33 — — Granted Exercised Balance at December 31, 2004 Granted Exercised Expired and cancelled Balance at December 31, 2005 Vested Granted Exercised Expired and cancelled Balance at December 31, 2006 295,000 (5,000) 1,940,479 285,000 — (5,000) 2,220,479 — 40,000 (215,000) (35,166) 2,010,313 10.85 3.57 7.02 9.87 — 7.81 7.58 — 8.09 4.42 8.52 7.91 $ 548,493 $ 6.21 1,211,986 6.91 1,700,313 $ 7.48 1,008,493 (728,438) 40,000 — (10,055) 310,000 SAR’s outstanding as at December 31, 2006 are summarized as follows: At December 31, 2006, the aggregate amount of shares to be issued on vested SAR’s was 237,059 shares with an intrinsic value of $1,754. At December 31, 2006, the aggregate amount of outstanding SAR’s had an intrinsic value of $1,754. Range of Exercise Prices SAR’s Outstanding Weighted Average Contractual Life Weighted Average Price Per Share Outstanding Number SAR’s Exercisable Weighted Average Price Per Share Weighted Average Contractual Life Exercisable Number $4.29 – $6.22 $6.23 – $8.33 $8.34 – $10.00 $10.01 – $13.73 640,000 435,313 580,000 355,000 4.59 0.14 $ 8.30 $ 1.23 $ 1.61 9.03 $ 11.57 1.57 4.59 640,000 $ 8.33 $ 405,313 $ 423,333 8.78 $ 11.58 231,667 0.14 0.58 1.05 1.56 76 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 14. Share Capital – (continued) (g) Restricted Stock Units During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company issued 50,000 restricted stock units of which 16,500 vest on each of the first and second anniversary dates with the remaining 17,000 vesting on September 6, 2007. In 2006 and 2005, the recipient of these shares of restricted stock exercised his contractual right to receive a cash payment of $127and $121, respectively, in lieu of the 16,500 shares of restricted stock that vested in 2006 and 2005, and as a result the underlying 16,500 shares of restricted stock in each year were cancelled. There were no restricted stock units issued during 2005. During 2006, the Company, under the 2005 Incentive Plan, granted 737,500 restricted stock and restricted stock units and awards, which vest between one and three years based on defined performance targets. The Company also granted 59,000 restricted stock and restricted stock units and awards, which vest on the third anniversary of the grant date. The value of these grants on the grant date was $6,830, which will result in stock-based compensation expense over the probable vesting period. (h) Warrants The Company measures the fair value of warrants using the Black-Scholes option pricing model on the date of grant. Warrants outstanding as at December 31, 2006 are summarized as follows: Range of Exercise Prices Warrants Outstanding Weighted Average Contractual Life Weighted Average Price Per Share Number Outstanding Warrants Exercisable Weighted Average Price Per Share Exercisable Number $11.62 – $13.05 $13.06 – $15.27 $15.28 – $16.77 102,426 466,394 164,706 2.13 $ 12.67 2.09 2.17 $ 13.71 $ 16.53 63,370 $ 12.64 430,394 $ 13.58 109,921 $ 16.53 During the year ended December 31, 2003, the Company issued 507,146 warrants with a weighted average exercise price of $10.61 and terms of three to five years. These warrants were issued as compensation to a lender and to an advisor. During the year ended December 31, 2004, the Company issued 736,186 warrants with a weighted average exercise price of $13.55 and a term of five years. Of these warrants, 240,173 were issued as acquisition consideration and 456,013 (including 120,919 issued on the private placement) were issued as compensation for services and treated as such for accounting purposes. 77 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 14. Share Capital – (continued) Information related to warrant transactions over the past three years is summarized as follows: Balance December 31, 2003 Granted Expired and cancelled Balance December 31, 2004 Granted Expired and cancelled Balance, December 31, 2005 Vested Granted Expired and cancelled Balance, December 31, 2006 Warrants Outstanding Warrants Exercisable Number Outstanding Weighted Average Price Per Share Number Outstanding Weighted Average Price Per Share Non Vested Warrants 507,146 $ 736,186 (222,660) 1,020,672 — (30,000) 990,672 — — (257,146) 733,526 $ 10.61 13.55 14.04 13.10 13.54 13.53 — 11.62 14.20 507,146 $ 10.61 648,159 12.20 768,168 13.06 603,685 $ 14.02 222,504 — (92,843) 129,661 At December 31, 2006, there was no intrinsic value of vested warrants. The Company has reserved a total of 5,731,765 Class A shares in order to meet its obligations under various conversion rights, warrants and employee share related plans. At December 31, 2006 there were 1,061,000 shares available for future option and similar grants. 15. Gain on Sale of Assets and Settlement of Long-term Debt and Other The gain on sale of assets and settlement of long-term debt for the years ended December 31 were as follows: 2006 2005 2004 CDI Transactions (a): Loss on settlement of exchangeable debentures Fair value adjustment on embedded derivative Gain on sale of equity interests in Custom Direct, Inc. Loss on settlement of long-term debt Gain (loss) on disposition of assets Gain (loss) on equity transactions of affiliates Gain on sale of cross currency swap Gain on recovery of investment $ — $ — — — 617 (626) 189 962 $ 1,142 $ — $ — — (351) 39 — 790 478 $ (9,569) 3,974 21,906 (1,274) (60) — — — 14,977 —————— (a) In February 2004, the Company sold its remaining 20% interest in Custom Direct Income Fund (the “Fund”) through the exchange of its interest in the Fund for the settlement of the adjustable rate exchangeable debentures issued on December 1, 2003 with a face value of $26,344. Based on the performance of the Fund for the period ended December 31, 2003, the Company was entitled to exchange its shares of Custom Direct, Inc. (“CDI”) for units of the Fund. On February 13, 2004, the adjustable rate exchangeable debentures were exchanged for units of the Fund in full settlement of the adjustable rate exchangeable debentures. At the date of settlement, the fair value of the CDI units for which the debentures were exchangeable was $33,991, which exceeded the issue price of the debentures by $7,647. The total loss on settlement of the exchangeable debenture of $9,569 includes $1,922 in respect of the write off of unamortized deferred financing costs. 78 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 15. Gain on Sale of Assets and Settlement of Long-term Debt and Other – (continued) The embedded derivative within the exchangeable debentures had a fair value which was deemed not material at the date of issuance and an unrealized loss of $3,974 as at December 31, 2003. From January 1, 2004 to the date of settlement, the accrued loss on the derivative increased by $3,673 to a total of $7,647 at the date of settlement. The resulting fair value adjustment of $3,974 in 2004 represents the increase to the accrued loss net of the amount realized on settlement. The fair value of the units of the Fund on February 13, 2004 received by the Company exceeded the Company’s equity carrying value of the 20% interest in CDI of $12,085, accordingly the Company recognized a gain on the sale of the CDI equity of $21,906. In the second quarter of 2003, the Company completed an Initial Public Offering (“IPO”) of the Fund and sold 80% of its interest in CDI to the Fund for cash and units of the Fund representing an 18.9% interest. Such units were sold in July 2003 for cash consideration equivalent to the IPO price per share. The net gain on asset dispositions includes charges for incentive payments to management including management of divested subsidiaries in the amount of $10,737. 16. Segmented Information During the fourth quarter of 2006, the Company assessed its reportable operating segments and reclassified, Margeotes Fertitta Powell, LLC (“MFP”) from the Strategic Marketing Services (“SMS”) segment to the Specialized Communication Services segment, as MFP’s performance currently and for the foreseeable future is more consistent with the performance of the operating units in the SCS segment. The Company has recast its prior year disclosures to conform to the current year presentation. The Company reports in three segments plus corporate. The segments are as follows: • • • The Strategic Marketing Services (“SMS”) segment includes Crispin Porter & Bogusky, kirshenbaum bond + partners, Zyman Group LLC among others. This segment consists of integrated marketing consulting services firms that offer a full complement of marketing consulting services including advertising and media, marketing communications including direct marketing, public relations, corporate communications, market research, corporate identity and branding, interactive marketing and sales promotion. Each of the entities within SMS share similar economic characteristics, specifically related to the nature of their respective services, the manner in which the services are provided and the similarity of their respective customers. Due to the similarities in these businesses, they exhibit similar long term financial performance and have been aggregated together. The Customer Relationship Management (“CRM”) segment provides marketing services that interface directly with the consumer of a client’s product or service. These services include the design, development and implementation of a complete customer service and direct marketing initiative intended to acquire, retain and develop a client’s customer base. This is accomplished using several domestic and a foreign- based customer contact facilities. The Specialized Communication Services (“SCS”) segment includes all of the Company’s other marketing services firms that are normally engaged to provide a single or a few specific marketing services to regional, national and global clients. These firms provide niche solutions by providing world class expertise in select marketing services. The significant accounting polices of these segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies included in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. The SCS segment is an “Other” segment pursuant SFAS 131 “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information”. 79 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 16. Segmented Information – (continued) Summary financial information concerning the Company’s operating segments is shown in the following tables: Revenue Cost of services sold Office and general expenses Depreciation and amortization Goodwill charges Operating Profit (Loss) Other Income (Expense): Other income Foreign exchange gain Interest expense, net Income from continuing operations before income taxes, equity in affiliates and minority interest Income taxes Income from continuing operations before equity in affiliates and minority interests Equity in earnings of non-consolidated affiliates Minority interests in income of consolidated subsidiaries Loss from continuing operations Loss from discontinued operations Net loss Stock-based compensation Capital expenditures Goodwill and intangibles Total assets For the Year Ended December 31, 2006 Strategic Marketing Services Customer Relationship Management Specialized Communication Services Corporate Total $241,481 $ 118,018 71,589 17,567 — $ 34,307 84,917 $ 61,419 16,531 5,003 — 1,964 $ 97,273 $ 67,362 20,341 1,903 6,306 1,361 — $423,671 246,799 — 132,523 24,062 24,757 284 — 6,306 13,286 $(24,346) 1,142 614 (10,764) 4,278 2,561 1,717 168 (16,708) (14,823) (18,716) $ (33,539) $ (13,077) $ (73) $ (3,558) $ — $ 1,010 $ $ 9,165 $ $185,033 $ $297,636 $ 24 $ 11,646 $ 37,823 $ 63,577 $ 2,339 1,460 29,770 93,838 $ 4,988 377 $ — $ $ 38,450 8,361 $ $ 22,648 $252,626 $493,501 80 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 16. Segmented Information – (continued) Restated for Discontinued Operations Revenue Cost of services sold Office and general expenses Depreciation and amortization Goodwill charges Operating Profit (Loss) Other Income (Expense): Other income Foreign exchange gain Interest expense, net Income from continuing operations before income taxes, equity in affiliates and minority interest Income taxes Income from continuing operations before equity in affiliates and minority interests Equity in earnings of non-consolidated affiliates Minority interests in income of consolidated subsidiaries Loss from continuing operations Income from discontinued operations Net loss Stock-based compensation Capital expenditures Goodwill and intangibles Total assets For the Year Ended December 31, 2005 Strategic Marketing Services Customer Relationship Management Specialized Communication Services Corporate Total $ 203,944 $ 97,316 54,810 17,892 — $ 33,926 $ 67,240 $ 51,913 10,427 3,578 — 1,322 $ 92,178 $ — $ 363,362 211,811 62,582 107,976 17,601 23,143 1,311 473 473 $ (25,500) $ 19,959 10,211 — 25,138 362 — 478 80 (7,474) 13,043 2,336 10,707 1,402 $ (21,192) (9,083) 1,134 $ (7,949) $ 3,272 $ 10,842 $ 252,165 $ 507,315 $ (18,205) $ (84) $ (2,903) $ — 519 $ $ 5,762 $ 187,977 $ 289,011 $ $ $ $ 81 4,028 28,761 50,362 $ $ $ $ — 766 35,366 91,914 $ 2,672 286 $ $ 61 $ 76,028 81 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 16. Segmented Information – (continued) Restated for Discontinued Operations Strategic Marketing Services For the Year Ended December 31, 2004 Specialized Communication Services Customer Relationship Management Corporate Total Revenue Cost of services sold Office and general expenses Depreciation and amortization Other Charges (recoveries) Operating Profit (Loss) Other Income (Expense): Other income Foreign exchange loss Interest expense, net Income from continuing operations before income taxes, equity in affiliates and minority interest Income taxes Income from continuing operations before equity in affiliates and minority interests Equity in earnings of non-consolidated affiliates Minority interests in income of consolidated subsidiaries Income from continuing operations Loss from discontinued operations Net Loss Stock-based compensation Capital Expenditures $110,883 $ 63,106 25,410 5,393 59,673 $ 43,746 8,847 3,451 $ 16,974 $ 3,629 $ 76,517 $ 52,113 14,829 1,168 (343) 8,750 — $247,073 158,965 — 75,893 26,807 10,249 237 (2,693) (2,350) 4,659 $(24,694) 14,977 (287) (6,618) 12,731 575 12,156 3,651 $ (9,235) 6,572 (8,729) (2,157) 8,388 8,309 $ $ $ (6,387) $ (245) $ (2,603) $ — $ 131 $ $ 2,771 $ 130 4,305 $ $ 78 1,156 $ $ 8,049 77 A summary of the Company’s revenue by geographic area, based on the location in which the goods or services originated, for the years ended December 31, is set forth in the following table. United States Canada Other Total 356,446 $59,255 $ 7,970 $ 423,671 304,010 $ 363,362 195,402 $ 247,073 $51,901 $44,998 $ 7,451 $ 6,673 Revenue 2006 $ $ 2005 $ 2004 82 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 16. Segmented Information – (continued) A summary of the Company’s long-lived assets, comprised of fixed assets, net, as at December 31, is set forth in the following table. Long-lived Assets United States Canada Other Total 2006 $ $ 2005 17. Related Party Transactions 38,933 $3,871 $ 1,621 $44,425 $ 30,720 $34,241 $3,413 108 (a) The Company incurred fees and paid incentive awards totaling $2,394 in 2006 (2005 – $2,375, 2004 – $2,805) relating to companies controlled by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of the Company in respect of services rendered pursuant to a management services agreement and incentive plans. The management services agreement provides for an annual retainer fee of $950 and is effective through October 31, 2007, subject to renewal. (b) In 2000, the Company agreed to provide to its CEO, Miles S. Nadal a bonus of C$10,000 ($8,581) in the event that the average market price of the Company’s Class A subordinate voting shares is C$30 ($26) per share or more for more than 20 consecutive trading days (measured as of the close of trading on each applicable date). This bonus is payable until the date that is three years after the date on which Mr. Nadal is no longer employed by the Company for any reason. The after-tax proceeds of such bonus are to be applied first as repayment of any outstanding loans due to the Company from this officer and his related companies in the amount of C$6,820 ($5,852) and C$3,000 ($2,574), respectively, as at December 31, 2006, both of which have been reserved for in the Company’s accounts. (c) In 2000, the Company purchased 1,600,000 shares in Trapeze Media Limited (“Trapeze”) for $215. At the same time, the Company’s CEO purchased 4,280,000 shares of Trapeze for $576, the Company’s former Chief Financial Officer and a Managing Director of the Company each purchased 50,000 Trapeze shares for $7 and a Board Member of the Company purchased 75,000 shares of Trapeze for $10. In 2001, the Company purchased an additional 1,250,000 shares for $161, and the Company’s CEO purchased 500,000 shares for $64. In 2002, the Company’s CEO purchased 3,691,930 shares of Trapeze for $470. All of these purchases were made at identical prices (i.e., C$.20/share). In 2003, the Company and the CEO exchanged their units in Trapeze for non-voting shares and entered into a voting trust agreement. In 2002, 2003 and 2004, the Company’s CEO advanced an aggregate amount equal to $171 (C$205) to Trapeze, and such loans were secured by Trapeze’s assets. In 2004, Trapeze repaid $108 (C$130) of the amounts owed to the Company’s CEO. In February 2005, the Company’s CEO provided Trapeze with a $203 (C$250) line of credit. The line of credit accrues interest at an annual interest rate equal to 15%. During 2006 and 2005 total interest and fees paid were approximately $14 and $66, respectively. At December 31, 2006, Trapeze had no borrowings under this line of credit. In addition, in 2006, 2005 and 2004, Trapeze paid $33, $31 and $20, respectively, in fees for accounting and other services to an entity affiliated with the Company’s CEO. During 2006 and 2005, Trapeze provided services to certain subsidiaries, the total amount of such services provided were $0.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively. (d) The Company also incurred fees totaling $276 in 2004 to a company controlled by a director of the Company in respect of services provided related to the monetization of Custom Direct Inc. and Davis + Henderson. During 2006 and 2005, the Company did not incur any additional fees. (e) A subsidiary of the Company charged fees of $149, $147 and $59 in 2006, 2005, 2004, respectively, to a trust of which an officer of the Company is a trustee. 83 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 18. Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees Deferred Acquisition Consideration. In addition to the consideration paid by the Company in respect of certain of its acquisitions at closing, additional consideration may be payable, or may be potentially payable based on the achievement of certain threshold levels of earnings. Should the current level of earnings be maintained by these acquired companies, no additional consideration, in excess of the deferred acquisition consideration reflected on the Company’s balance sheet at December 31, 2006, would be expected to be owing in the future. Put Options. Owners of interests in certain subsidiaries have the right in certain circumstances to require the Company to acquire the remaining ownership interests held by them. The owners’ ability to exercise any such “put” right is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including conditions requiring notice in advance of exercise. In addition, these rights cannot be exercised prior to specified staggered exercise dates. The exercise of these rights at their earliest contractual date would result in obligations of the Company to fund the related amounts during the period 2007 to 2014. It is not determinable, at this time, if or when the owners of these rights will exercise all or a portion of these rights. The amount payable by the Company in the event such rights are exercised is dependent on various valuation formulas and on future events, such as the average earnings of the relevant subsidiary through the date of exercise, the growth rate of the earnings of the relevant subsidiary during that period, and, in some cases, the currency exchange rate at the date of payment. Management estimates, assuming that the subsidiaries owned by the Company at December 31, 2006, perform over the relevant future periods at their 2006 earnings levels, that these rights, if all exercised, could require the Company, in future periods, to pay an aggregate amount of approximately $116,641 to the owners of such rights to acquire such ownership interests in the relevant subsidiaries. Of this amount, the Company is entitled, at its option, to fund approximately $24,861 by the issuance of share capital. The ultimate amount payable relating to these transactions will vary because it is dependent on the future results of operations of the subject businesses and the timing of when and if these rights are exercised. Natural Disasters. Certain of the Company’s operations are located in regions of the United States which typically are subject to hurricanes. During the year ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, these operations incurred costs of nil and $128, respectively related to damages resulting from hurricanes. Guarantees. In connection with certain dispositions of assets and/or businesses in 2001 and 2003, the Company has provided customary representations and warranties whose terms range in duration and may not be explicitly defined. The Company has also retained certain liabilities for events occurring prior to sale, relating to tax, environmental, litigation and other matters. Generally, the Company has indemnified the purchasers in the event that a third party asserts a claim against the purchaser that relates to a liability retained by the Company. These types of indemnification guarantees typically extend for a number of years. In connection with the sale of the Company’s investment in CDI, the amounts of indemnification guarantees were limited to the total sale price of approximately $84,000. For the remainder, the Company’s potential liability for these indemnifications are not subject to a limit as the underlying agreements do not always specify a maximum amount and the amounts are dependent upon the outcome of future contingent events. Historically, the Company has not made any significant indemnification payments under such agreements and no amount has been accrued in the accompanying consolidated financial statements with respect to these indemnification guarantees. The Company continues to monitor the conditions that are subject to guarantees and indemnifications to identify whether it is probable that a loss has occurred, and would recognize any such losses under any guarantees or indemnifications in the period when those losses are probable and estimable. For guarantees and indemnifications entered into after January 1, 2003, in connection with the sale of the Company’s investment in CDI, the Company has estimated the fair value of its liability, which was insignificant. 84 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 18. Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees – (continued) Legal Proceedings. The Company’s operating entities are involved in legal proceedings of various types. While any litigation contains an element of uncertainty, the Company has no reason to believe that the outcome of such proceedings or claims will have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company. Commitments. The Company has commitments to fund $448 in an investment fund over a period of up to two years. At December 31, 2006, the Company has $4,485 of undrawn outstanding letters of credit. Leases. The Company and its subsidiaries lease certain facilities and equipment. Gross premises rental expense amounted to $17,521 for 2006, $16,465 for 2005 and $12,793 for 2004, which was reduced by sublease income of $1,346 in 2006, $1,517 in 2005 and $921 in 2004. Where leases contain escalation clauses or other concessions, the impact of such adjustments is recognized on a straight-line basis over the minimum lease period. Minimum rental commitments for the rental of office and production premises and equipment under non- cancellable leases net of sublease income, some of which provide for rental adjustments due to increased property taxes and operating costs for 2006 and thereafter, are as follows: Period Amount 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 and thereafter 15,890 14,956 13,846 12,911 7,130 14,957 $79,690 At December 31, 2006, the total future cash to be received on sublease income is $4,019. 19. New Accounting Pronouncements In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”. This Interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. This Interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, with earlier application permitted. The Company does not believe the adoption of this interpretation will have a material effect on its financial statements. In September 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements”. This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement is effective for all fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is encouraged. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this statement on its financial statements. In September 2006, FASB issued SFAS No. 158, “Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans”. This statement requires employers with defined benefit plans to recognize the over funded or under funded status of a defined benefit plan. This statement also expands the required disclosures around these plans. This statement is effective for all fiscal years ending after December 15, 2006.The adoption of this statement did not impact the Company’s financial statements. In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 108. This guidance requires registrants to quantify the misstatement of current year financial statements that result from misstatements of prior year financial statements. This guidance is effective for annual financial 85 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) 19. New Accounting Pronouncements – (continued) statements covering the first fiscal year ending after November 15, 2006. The Company’s adoption of this guidance did not have any effect on its financial statements. In February 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). This statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This statement expands the use of fair value measurement and applies to entities that elect the fair value option. The fair value option established by this Statement permits all entities to choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates. SFAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this statement on its financial statements. 20. Subsequent Events On February 2, 2007, the Company, through its subsidiary Bryan Mills Group Ltd. (“Bryan Mills”), acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of Iradesso Communications Corp., a Canadian financial communications firm. The purchase price for this transaction included a cash payment equal to approximately $342 and the issuance of shares in Bryan Mills representing 11.85% of the ownership in Bryan Mills valued at approximately $660. The Company incurred transaction costs of approximately $40 for a total purchase price of approximately $1,040. Note 21. Quarterly Results Of Operations (Unaudited) (Restated for Discontinued Operations) The following table sets forth a summary of the Company’s consolidated unaudited quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, in thousands of dollars, except per share amounts. First Second Third Fourth Quarters Revenue – Services: 2006 $98,073 $ 100,138 $ 101,122 $ 124,338 $ 102,318 2005 $ 90,355 $ 96,977 $73,712 Cost of services sold: 2006 2005 Income (loss) from continuing operations: 2006 2005 Net loss: 2006 2005 Loss per common share: Basic Continuing operations: 2006 2005 Net loss: 2006 2005 Diluted Continuing operations: 2006 2005 Net loss: 2006 2005 $59,741 $47,190 $ 60,900 $ 57,150 $ 52,480 $ 55,509 $ 69,008 $ 56,632 $ (4,243) $ $ $ 1,237 (869) $ (3,137) 521 $ (2,315) $ (6,574) $ (8,526) $ (5,133) $ (10,503) $ (12,909) (964) $ (1,655) $ (3,783) $ $ (4,994) $ (1,547) $ (0.18) $ $ (0.06) $ (0.04) $ (0.02) $ (0.13) (0.10) $ (0.22) $ $ (0.17) $ (0.44) $ (0.04) $ (0.54) (0.07) $ (0.18) $ $ (0.06) $ (0.04) $ (0.02) $ (0.13) (0.10) $ (0.22) $ $ (0.17) $ (0.44) $ (0.04) $ (0.54) (0.07) $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ (0.27) (0.21) (0.20) (0.06) (0.27) (0.21) (0.20) (0.06) 86 MDC PARTNERS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (thousands of United States dollars, unless otherwise stated except share and per share amounts) Note 21. Quarterly Results Of Operations (Unaudited) – (continued) (Restated for Discontinued Operations) The above revenue, cost of services sold, and income (loss) from continuing operations have primarily been affected by acquisitions, divestitures and discontinued operations. Historically, with some exceptions, the Company’s fourth quarter generates the highest quarterly revenues in a year. The fourth quarter has historically been the period in the year in which the highest volumes of media placements and retail related consumer marketing occur. Income (loss) from continuing operations and net income (loss) have been affected as follows: • • The fourth quarter of 2006 and 2005 include impairment charges of $6,306 and $473, respectively. The fourth quarter of 2006 includes a one time reversal of a termination of a prior commitment of $1,980 and the elimination of potential liabilities of $1,251 relating to a change in estimate. 87 Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures Not Applicable. Item 9A. Controls and Procedures (a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be included in our SEC reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the applicable time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and our President and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), who is our principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. We conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our CEO, our CFO and our management Disclosure Committee, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the Exchange Act. Based on that evaluation, the Company has concluded that its disclosure controls and procedures were effective. (b) Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. We assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on our assessment, we believe that, as of December 31, 2006, we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting based on these criteria. Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, has been attested to by BDO Seidman LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included herein. (c) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting Management previously assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005. Based on that assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2005, the Company had material weaknesses in the following areas: accounting for complex and non-routine transactions; revenue recognition and accounting for related costs; and segregation of duties. These weaknesses are described in greater detail in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005. A material weakness, as defined under standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board’s (“PCAOB”) Auditing Standard No. 2, is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. During the first three quarters of the year ended December 31, 2006, we reported on Form 10-Q significant changes made to our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) to address our previously reported material weaknesses. Specifically, in response to the material weaknesses in accounting for complex and non-routine transactions and revenue and accounting for related costs, the Company improved its procedures for reviewing underlying business agreements and analyzing, reviewing and documenting the support for management’s accounting entries and significant transactions. These new controls and procedures include policies requiring that all new material contracts 88 and the accounting for such contracts (including revenue and lease contracts) must be reviewed by the Company’s head office to ensure appropriateness of the applicable accounting treatment. In addition, the Company strengthened its controls and procedures related to its review of subsidiary monthly financial statements. The Company further implemented controls and procedures with respect to the review and implementation of new accounting pronouncements, including procedures for ensuring appropriate documentation of significant transactions and application of accounting standards. These procedures were effective through the hiring of additional accounting and finance department staff with US GAAP experience at the Company’s operating subsidiaries and corporate head office. These remedial procedures were sufficient to eliminate the previously identified material weaknesses in accounting for complex and non-routine transactions and revenue and accounting for related costs. To address the segregation of duties issues throughout the Company, management hired additional personnel to implement and properly support management’s process for evaluating internal controls over financial reporting. The Company’s remedial procedures were highly focused on reviewing the responsibilities of individuals within the accounting and finance departments, as well as implementing controls over computer access and establishing processes to restrict unauthorized access. These remedial procedures were sufficient to eliminate the previously- identified material weakness in the area of segregation of duties as of December 31, 2006. (d) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Board of Directors and Shareholders MDC Partners Inc.: We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Item 9A, Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that MDC Partners Inc. and subsidiaries maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). MDC Partners Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. In our opinion, management’s assessment that MDC Partners Inc. and subsidiaries maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the COSO criteria. Also in our opinion, MDC Partners Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the COSO criteria. 89 We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of MDC Partners Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006 and the related consolidated statement of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2006 and our report dated March 15, 2007 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon. /s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP New York, New York March 15, 2007 Item 9B. Other Information Not Applicable. 90 Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant PART III Reference is made to the sections captioned “Election of Directors,” “Information Concerning Nominees,” “Information Concerning Executive Officers”, “Audit Committee Financial Expert”, “Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers” and “Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act” in our Proxy Statement for the 2007 Annual General Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed with the Commission within 120 days of the close of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, which sections are incorporated herein by reference. Executive Officers of MDC Partners The executive officers of MDC Partners as of March 6, 2007 are: Name Age Office Miles S. Nadal(1) Steven Berns(1) Charles K. Porter Robert E. Dickson Mitchell S. Gendel Graham L. Rosenberg Michael Sabatino Gavin Swartzman Glenn W. Gibson Thomas Boyle —————— (1) Also a director 49 Chairman of the Board, and Chief Executive Officer 42 President and Chief Financial Officer 62 Chief Strategist 48 Managing Director 41 General Counsel & Corporate Secretary 44 Managing Director 42 Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer 42 Managing Director 48 Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer, Canadian Marketing Communications 38 Vice President and Corporate Controller There is no family relationship among any of the executive officers. Mr. Nadal was the founder of MDC and has held the positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of MDC since 1986 and, until November 2005, the position of President of the Company. Mr. Nadal is active in supporting various business and community organizations including Mount Sinai Hospital, Junior Achievement of Canada, The Young Presidents Association and the Schulich School of Business. Mr. Berns joined MDC Partners in September 2004 as Vice Chairman and Executive Vice President, and was promoted to President and Chief Financial Officer in November 2005. Prior to joining MDC Partners, he served as Treasurer and Senior Vice President at The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc., an organization of advertising agencies and marketing services companies, from August 1999 until September 2004. Before that, Mr. Berns held a variety of positions in finance at Revlon, Inc. from April 1992 until August 1999, becoming Vice President and Treasurer in 1996. Mr. Dickson has been a Managing Director of the Company since September 2003. Mr Dickson joined Maxxcom Inc., a subsidiary of MDC Partners, in November 2000 as Executive Vice President, Corporate Development. He is responsible for corporate development for MDC and its operating companies. Prior to joining Maxxcom, Mr. Dickson was a partner of Fraser Milner Casgrain, a Canadian business law firm, where he practiced law for 17 years. Mr. Dickson is a trustee of H&R Real Estate Investment Trust. Mr. Gendel joined MDC Partners in November 2004 as General Counsel and Corporate Secretary. Prior to joining MDC Partners, he served as Vice President and Assistant General Counsel at The Interpublic Group of Companies, Inc. from December 1999 until September 2004. Mr. Porter has been the Chief Strategist of the Company since September of 2003. He is responsible for identifying future agency partnerships as well as strategic assistance for MDC and its operating companies. Mr. Porter is also the chairman of Crispin Porter + Bogusky, one of the top creative shops in the country. Mr. Porter served as a creative director and partner of Crispin Porter +Bogusky. Crispin Porter + Bogusky joined Maxxcom Inc., a subsidiary of MDC Partners, in January 2001. 91 Mr. Rosenberg joined MDC in October 2002 as Executive Vice President and has been a Managing Director of the Company since July 2003. He is responsible for the corporate development of MDC and its operating companies. Prior to that, Mr. Rosenberg served as Executive Vice President of Maxxcom Inc., a subsidiary of MDC Partners, which he joined in November 2001. Before joining Maxxcom, Mr. Rosenberg was Executive Vice President of Amadeus Capital Corporation, a privately held investment firm which he joined in July 2001, after spending eight years as a Managing Partner at Clairvest Group Inc., a publicly traded merchant bank. Mr. Sabatino joined MDC Partners on April 1, 2005 as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer. Prior to joining MDC Partners, he was an audit partner with the accounting firm of Eisner LLP from April 2004. Prior to that, from December 2001 to March 2004, he was the Co-CFO/Senior Vice President Finance of JAKKs Pacific, Inc., a publicly-held toy company. Before that, Mr. Sabatino was an audit partner at BDO Seidman, LLP, a public accounting firm. Mr. Swartzman has been a Managing Director of the Company since October 2004. He is responsible for corporate development and real estate for MDC and its operating companies. Mr. Swartzman served as an officer in a similar capacity for the Company from September 2002 until February 2003. Prior thereto, Mr. Swartzman joined Amadeus Capital Corporation in 2000 as Senior Vice President where he was responsible for various corporate development activities of that company and its affiliates, including serving as the Vice President, Corporate Development from February 2003 to October 2004 for First Asset Management Inc., a Toronto based asset management company. Prior thereto, he was Executive Vice President of Pet Valu International Inc., a retail chain. Mr. Gibson has been a Senior Vice President, Finance of the Company since July 2003, and became Chief Financial Officer, Canadian Marketing Communications in January 2006. Mr. Gibson joined Maxxcom Inc., a subsidiary of MDC Partners, in July 2000 as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining Maxxcom, Mr. Gibson served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Queensway Financial Holdings Limited, a TSX-listed company with operations in Canada and the United States, and ten years as Corporate Controller of the Singer Company, a NYSE-listed company with global operations. Mr. Boyle joined MDC Partners on July 25, 2005 as Vice President and Corporate Controller. Prior to joining MDC Partners, Mr. Boyle was Senior Director of Corporate Finance at Symbol Technologies, Inc from March 2004 to May 2005. Prior thereto, he served as Assistant Corporate Controller at Moody’s Corporation from October 2002 to March 2004. Before that, Mr. Boyle was Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer at DoubleClick.Inc. Additional information about our directors and executive officers appears under the captions “Election of Directors” and “Executive Compensation” in our Proxy Statement. Code of Conduct The Company has adopted a Code of Conduct, which applies to all directors, officers (including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries. The Company’s policy is to not permit any waiver of the Code of Conduct for any director or executive officer, except in extremely limited circumstances. Any waiver of this Code of Conduct for directors or officers of the Company must be approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. Amendments to and waivers of the Code of Conduct will be publicly disclosed as required by applicable laws, rules and regulations. The Code of Conduct is available free of charge on the Company’s website at http://www.mdc-partners.com, or by writing to MDC Partners Inc., 950 Third Avenue, New York, NY, 10022, Attention: Investor Relations. Item 11. Executive Compensation Reference is made to the sections captioned “Directors’ Compensation” and “Compensation of Executive Officers” in our next Proxy Statement, which are incorporated herein by reference. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters Reference is made to Part II – Item 5 of this Form 10-K and to the sections captioned “Common Share Ownership by Directors and Executive Officers and Principal Stockholders” in the Company’s next Proxy Statement, which are incorporated herein by reference. 92 Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions Reference is made to the section captioned “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” in our next Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference. Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services Reference is made to the section captioned “Independent Public Accountants” in our next Proxy Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference. 93 REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM Board of Directors and Shareholders MDC Partners Inc. New York, New York The audit referred to in our report dated March 15, 2007 relating to the consolidated financial statements of MDC Partners Inc. and subsidiaries which is contained in Item 8 of this Form 10-K included the audit of the financial statement Schedule II. This 2006 financial statement schedule is the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial statement schedule based upon our audit. In our opinion such financial statement schedule present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth herein. /s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP New York, New York March 15, 2007 94 Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statements Schedules (a) Financial Statements and Schedules PART IV The Financial Statements and schedules listed in the accompanying index to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 are filed as part of this report. Schedules not included in the index have been omitted because they are not applicable. Schedule II – 1 of 2 MDC PARTNERS INC. & SUBSIDIARIES SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS For the Three Years Ended December 31, 2006 (Dollars in Thousands) Column A Column B Column C Column D Balance at Beginning of Period Charged to Costs and Expenses Removal of Uncollectable Receivables Column E Translation Adjustments Increase (Decrease) Column F Balance at the End of Period Description Valuation accounts deducted from assets to which they apply – allowance for doubtful accounts: December 31, 2006 December 31, 2005 December 31, 2004 $ $ $ 1,250 $ $ 1,521 $ 497 716 $ $ 595 $ 780 332 $ (1,002) (99) (1) $ 1,633 $ 1,250 $ 1,521 136 343 Schedule II – 2 of 2 MDC PARTNERS INC. & SUBSIDIARIES SCHEDULE II—VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS For the Three Years Ended December 31, 2006 (Dollars in Thousands) Column A Description Column B Column C Column D Balance at Beginning of Period Charged to Costs and Expenses Other Column E Translation Adjustments Increase (Decrease) Column F Balance at the End of Period Valuation accounts deducted from assets to which they apply – valuation allowance for deferred income taxes: December 31, 2006 December 31, 2005 December 31, 2004 $ $ $ 44,721 $ $ 42,555 $ 31,283 3,038 $ 18,226(1) $ $ $ $ (225) $ 8,024 943 915 (195) $ 65,790 $ 44,721 1,448 $ 42,555 2,333 (1) Adjustment to reconcile actual net operating loss carry forwards to prior year tax accrued, which were fully reserved and adjustment for net operating loss relating to sale of business. (b) Exhibits The exhibits listed on the accompanying Exhibits Index are filed as a part of this report. 95 Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. SIGNATURES Date: March 16, 2007 MDC PARTNERS INC. By: /s/ Miles S. Nadal Name: Miles S. Nadal Title: Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated. Signature Title Date /s/ Miles S. Nadal Miles S. Nadal /s/ Steven Berns Steven Berns /s/ Robert Kamerschen Robert Kamerschen /s/ Thomas N. Davidson Thomas N. Davidson /s/ Richard R. Hylland Richard R. Hylland /s/ Scott Kauffman Scott Kauffman /s/ Michael J. Kirby Michael J. Kirby /s/ Stephen M. Pustil Stephen M. Pustil /s/ Francois R. Roy Francois R. Roy /s/ Thomas Weigman Thomas Weigman /s/ Michael Sabatino Michael Sabatino Chairman and Chief Executive Officer March 16, 2007 Director, President and Chief Financial Officer March 16, 2007 Presiding Director March 16, 2007 Director Director Director Director Director Director Director March 16, 2007 March 16, 2007 March 16, 2007 March 16, 2007 March 16, 2007 March 16, 2007 March 16, 2007 Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting March 16, 2007 Officer 96 Exhibit No. EXHIBIT INDEX Description 3.1 Articles of Amalgamation, dated January 1, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2004); 3.1.1 Articles of Continuance, dated June 28, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on August 4, 2004); 3.2 4.1 4.2 General By-law No. 1, as amended on April 29, 2005;* Trust Indenture, dated as of June 28, 2005, by and between the Company and Computershare Trust Company of Canada Inc. relating to the issuance of the Company’s 8% convertible debentures (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2005); MDC Corporation Inc., Custom Direct Income Fund and CIBC Mellon Company (as Trustee) Trust Indenture dated December 8, 2003, providing for the issuance of adjustable rate exchangeable securities due December 31, 2028 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2004); 10.1.1 Underwriting Agreement made as of November 20, 2003 between MDC Corporation Inc., among others, and the Underwriters to issue adjustable rate exchangeable securities (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2004); 10.1.2 Underwriting Agreement made as of July 18, 2003 between MDC Corporation Inc., among others, and the Underwriters to sell Custom Direct Income Fund Trust units (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2004); 10.1.3 Amending Agreement made July 25, 2003 to the Underwriting Agreement made July 18, 2003 between MDC Corporation Inc, among others, and the Underwriters (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1.5 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2004); 10.1.4 Acquisition Agreement made as of May 15, 2003 between MDC Corporation Inc. and Custom Direct Income Fund, among others (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2004); 10.1.5 Amending Agreement to the Acquisition Agreement dated May 15, 2003, made as of May 29, 2003 between MDC Corporation Inc. and Custom Direct Income Fund, among others (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1.4 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2004); 10.2 10.3 Underwriting Agreement, dated June 10, 2005, by and among the Company and four underwriters, for the purchase of 8% convertible unsecured debentures of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on June 16, 2005); Stock Purchase Agreement, dated November 3, 2006, by and among the Company (as seller), Secured Products (Cayman), Inc. (as purchaser) and H.I.G. Capital Management, Inc., relating to the sale of the Company’s Secure Products International Group (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on November 9, 2006); 10.4 Employment Agreement between the Company and Robert Dickson, dated July 26, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2004); 10.5 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and Graham Rosenberg, dated as of December 26, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on March 15, 2006); 10.6 Separation and Consulting Agreement between the Company and Stephen M. Pustil, dated as of January 12, 2007;* 10.7 Management Services Agreement relating to employment of Miles Nadal, dated January 1, 2000, as amended (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2004); 10.7.1 Letter Agreement between the Company and Miles Nadal, dated April 11, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6.1 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on April 18, 2005); 10.8 Employment Agreement between the Company and Steven Berns, dated August 25, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on December 20, 2004); 97 Exhibit No. 10.8.1 Amendment No. 1 to Employment Agreement between the Company and Steven Berns, dated as of March 6, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8.1 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on March 15, 2006); Description 10.9 Employment Agreement between the Company and Mitchell Gendel, dated November 17, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on April 18, 2005); 10.10 Employment Agreement between the Company and Michael Sabatino, dated April 1, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on April 18, 2005); Amended and Restated Stock Option Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the 10.11 Company’s Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2004); 10.12 Stock Appreciation Rights Plan dated as of April 22, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2004); 10.12.1 Amended and Restated Stock Appreciation Rights Plan, as amended on April 28, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on May 5, 2006); 10.12.2 Form of Stock Appreciation Rights Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the 10.13.1 Company’s 10-Q filed on May 5, 2006); 2005 Stock Incentive Plan of the Company, adopted by the shareholders of the Company on May 26, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit B of the Company’s Proxy Statement on Form DEF 14A filed on April 29, 2005); 10.13.2 Form of Stock Option Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on November 9, 2005); 10.13.3 Form of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on November 9, 2005); 10.13.4 Form of Financial Performance-Based Restricted Stock Grant Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on March 2, 2006); 10.13.5 Form of Financial Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Grant Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on March 2, 2006); 10.14.1 Membership Unit Purchase Agreement (the “Zyman Purchase Agreement”), dated as of April 1, 2005 among the Company, and ZG Acquisition Inc., Zyman Group, LLC, Zyman Company, Inc. and certain employees of Zyman Group, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on April 1, 2005); 10.14.2 Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Zyman Group, LLC dated as of April 1, 2005, by and among the Company, ZG Acquisition Inc., Zyman Group, LLC, Zyman Company, Inc. and certain employees of Zyman Group, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on April 1, 2005); 10.14.3 Amendment No. 1, dated as of August 8, 2005, to the Zyman Purchase Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on August 9, 2005); 10.14.4 Amendment, dated January 31, 2006, to the Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Zyman Group, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14.4 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on March 15, 2006); 10.15 Credit Agreement made September 22, 2004 between MDC Partners Inc., a Canadian corporation, Maxxcom Inc., an Ontario corporation, and Maxxcom Inc., a Delaware corporation, as borrowers, the Lenders (as defined therein) and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as US Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, Toronto Branch, as Canadian Administrative Agent, and Schedules thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on December 20, 2004); 10.15.1 Amendment No. 1 dated as of November 19, 2004 to the Credit Agreement made September 22, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on November 24, 2004); 10.15.2 Amendment No. 2 dated as of March 14, 2005 to the Credit Agreement made September 22, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on March 16, 2005); 98 Exhibit No. Description 10.15.3 Amendment No. 3 dated as of April 1, 2005 to the Credit Agreement made September 22, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on April 1, 2005); 10.15.4 Amendment No. 4 dated as of May 9, 2005 to the Credit Agreement made September 22, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on May 9, 2005); 10.15.5 Amendment No. 5 dated as of June 6, 2005 to the Credit Agreement made September 22, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on June 6, 2005); 10.15.6 Amendment No. 6 dated as of October 31, 2005 to the Credit Agreement made September 22, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on October 31, 2005); 10.15.7 Amendment No. 7 dated as of January 17, 2006 to the Credit Agreement made September 22, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed on January 17, 2006); 10.15.8 Amendment No. 8 dated as of August 3, 2006, to the Credit Agreement made September 22, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed on August 8, 2006); 10.15.9 Amendment No. 9 dated as of November 3, 2006, to the Credit Agreement made September 22, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 10-Q filed November 8, 2006); 10.15.10 Amendment No. 10 dated as of March 8, 2007, to the Credit Agreement made September 22, 2004* 12 14.1 Statement of computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges* Code of Conduct of MDC Partners Inc. (2005) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on April 18, 2005); 14.2 MDC Partners’ Corporate Governance Guidelines adopted on March 6, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.2 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed on March 15, 2006); 21 23.1 23.2 31.1 Subsidiaries of Registrant*; Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm [KPMG LLP]*; Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm [BDO Seidman LLP]*; Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rules 13a 14(a) and 15d 14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*; 31.2 Certification by President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a 14(a) and 15d 14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*; 32.1 Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 USC. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*; 32.2 Certification by President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 USC. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*. —————— * Filed electronically herewith. 99 [This page intentionally left blank.] MDC Partners Inc. Directory MDC Partners Inc. Toronto Office 45 Hazelton Avenue Toronto, ON M5R 2E3 Tel: 416-960-9000 Fax: 416-960-9555 www.mdc-partners.com Chairman & CEO: Miles S. Nadal New York Office 950 Third Avenue, 5th Floor New York, NY 10022 Tel: 646-429-1818 Fax: 212-937-4365 www.mdc-partners.com President & CFO: Steven Berns Dotglu LLC 160 Varick Street 4th Floor New York, NY 10013 Tel: 212-462-1300 Fax: 212-633-1719 www.dotglu.com President: Steve Thibodeau Fletcher Martin LLC 303 Peachtree Center Avenue Suite 625 Atlanta, GA 30303 Tel: 404-221-1188 Fax: 404-223-1136 www.fletchermartin.com President & CEO: Andy Fletcher Hello Design LLC 8684 Washington Boulevard Culver City, CA 90232 Tel: 310-839-4885 Fax: 310-839-4886 www.hellodesign.com CEO & Creative Director: David Lai henderson bas 479 Wellington Street West Main Floor Toronto, ON M5V 1E7 Tel: 416-977-6660 Fax: 416-977-2226 www.theniceagency.com President: Dawna Henderson HL Group 853 Broadway, 18th Floor New York, NY 10003 Tel: 212-529-5533 Fax: 212-529-2131 Founding Partners: Hamilton South Lynn Tesoro Marketing Communications Division Accent Marketing Services LLC 400 Missouri Avenue Suite 107 Jeffersonville, Indiana 47130 Tel: 812-206-6200 Fax: 812-206-6201 www.accentonline.com President: Kevin Foley Bryan Mills Iradesso Corp. 1129 Leslie Street Toronto, ON M3C 2K5 Tel: 416-447-4740 Fax: 416-447-4760 www.bryanmills.com Chairman & CEO: Nancy Ladenheim Accumark Communications Inc. 240 Duncan Mill Road Suite 101 North York, ON M3B 1Z4 Tel: 416-446-7758 Fax: 416-446-1923 www.accumark.com President: Tom Green Allard Johnson Communications Inc. 2 Bloor Street East 26th Floor Toronto, ON M4W 3J4 Tel: 416-260-7000 Fax: 416-260-7100 www.allard-johnson.com President & CEO: Terry Johnson ACLC Inc. 469A King Street Toronto, ON M5V 3M4 Tel: 416-425-8200 Fax: 416-425-5962 www.aclc.ca Chairman & CEO: Esmé Carol Bratskeir & Company 400 Lafayette Street 5th Floor New York, NY 10003 Tel: 212-679-2233 Fax: 212-982-5401 www.bratskeir.com Managing Directors: Mike Rosen Mark Malinowski Bruce Mau Design Inc. 197 Spadina Avenue Suite 501 Toronto, ON M5T 2C8 Tel: 416-260-5777 Fax: 416-260-2770 www.brucemaudesign.com Chairman: Bruce Mau Chinnici Direct Inc. 411 Lafayette Street 3rd Floor New York, NY 10003 Tel: 212-260-3736 Tel: 212-561-6000 Fax: 212-260-3710 www.chinnicidirect.com President: Nick Nocca Cliff Freeman and Partners 375 Hudson Street 8th Floor New York, NY 10014 Tel: 212-463-3200 Fax: 212-463-3325 www.clifffreeman.com Chairman & CEO: Cliff Freeman Colle & McVoy Inc. Wyman Building 400 First Avenue N Minneapolis, MN 55401 Tel: 612-305-6000 Fax: 612-305-6001 www.collemcvoy.com Chairman & CEO: Christine Fruechte Computer Composition of Canada Inc. 12 Stanley Court Whitby, ON L1N 8P9 Tel: 905-430-3400 Fax: 905-430-2412 Chairman & CEO: Joe Bugelli Crispin Porter + Bogusky Florida Office 3390 Mary Street Office 300 Coconut Grove FL 33133 Tel: 305-859-2070 Fax: 305-854-3419 Colorado Office 6450 Gunpark Drive Boulder, CO 80301 www.cpbgroup.com Chairman: Chuck Porter MDC Partners Inc. Directory (continued) Integrated Healthcare Communications 555 Richmond Street West Suite 918 Toronto, ON M5V 3B1 Tel: 416-504-8733 Fax: 416-504-8737 www.ihcinc.com Managing Director: Phil Faghnan Ito Partnership 400 Lafayette New York, NY 10003 Tel: 917-378-8525 www.ito-partner.com CEO: David Melançon kirshenbaum bond + partners 160 Varick Street New York, NY 10013 Tel: 212-633-0080 Fax: 212-463-8643 www.kb.com Co-Chairmen: Richard Kirshenbaum Jon Bond LIME Public Relations & Promotions 160 Varick Street 4th Floor New York, NY 10013 Tel: 212-337-6000 Fax: 212-633-1711 www.limecomm.com President: Claudia Strauss Yamamoto Moss Mackenzie 505 North Highway 169 Suite 350 Minneapolis, MN 55441 Tel: 763-417-7300 Fax: 763-417-7301 www.mackenziemarketing.com President: Andrew Mackenzie Margeotes Fertitta Powell 411 Lafayette Street 6th Floor New York, NY 10003 Tel: 212-979-6600 Fax: 212-475-3827 www.margeotes.com CEO: Michael Kantrow The Media Kitchen 160 Varick Street, 4th Floor New York, NY 10013 Tel: 646-336-9400 Fax: 646-336-6627 www.mediakitchen.tv Chairman & CEO: Barry Lowenthal Mobium Creative Group 444 North Michigan Avenue 27th Floor Chicago, IL 60611 Tel: 312-527-0500 Fax: 312-822-9628 www.mobium.com Managing Partner: Gordon Hochhalter Mono Advertising LLC 2902 Garfield Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55408 Tel: 612-822-4135 Fax: 612-822-4136 www.mono-1.com Managing Partner: James Scott Northstar Research Partners Inc. 18 King Street East Suite 1500 Toronto, ON M5V 3B1 Tel: 416-907-7100 Fax: 416-907-7149 www.nsresearch.com President: Stephen Tile Northstar Research Partners (USA) LLC One Penn Plaza Suite 1932 New York, NY 10119 Tel: 212-986-4077 Fax: 212-986-4088 Managing Director: James Neuwirth Onbrand 43 Davies Avenue Toronto, ON M4M 2A9 Tel: 416-366-8883 Fax: 416-366-2151 www.onbranddesign.com President: Greg Bérubé Pro-Image Corporation 1805 Loucks Road York, PA 17404 Tel: 717-764-5880 Fax: 717-764-6140 Chairman & CEO: Joe Bugelli Source Marketing LLC 15 Ketchum Street Westport, CT 06880 Tel: 203-291-4000 Fax: 203-291-4010 www.source-marketing.com President: Derek Correra TargetCom LLC 444 North Michigan Avenue 27th Floor Chicago, IL 60611 Tel: 312-822-1100 Fax: 312-822-9628 www.targetcom.com President: Nora Ligurotis Veritas Communications Inc. 161 Eglinton Avenue East Suite 704 Toronto, ON M4P 1J5 Tel: 416-482-2248 Fax: 416-482-2292 www.veritascanada.com President: Beverley Hammond VitroRobertson LLC 625 Broadway 4th Floor San Diego, CA 92101-5403 Tel: 619-234-0408 Fax: 619-234-4015 www.vitrorobertson.com Partners: John Vitro John Robertson Zig Inc. 296 Richmond Street West Suite 600 Toronto, ON M5V 1X2 Tel: 416-598-4944 Fax: 416-593-4944 www.zig.ca President: Andy Macaulay Zig (USA) LLC 848 West Eastman Suite 204 Chicago, Il 60622 Tel: 312-587-3333 Fax: 312-587-3334 www.zigideas.com Managing Partners: Steve Carli Kevin Lynch Zyman Group LLC 950 East Paces Ferry Road Suite 3300 Atlanta, GA 30326 Tel: 404-260-3000 Fax: 404-682-5446 www.zyman.com Chairman: Sergio Zyman Board of Directors and Corporate Officers Chairman Directors Corporate Officers Miles S. Nadal Chairman & Chief Executive Officer MDC Partners Inc. Steven Berns President & Chief Financial Officer MDC Partners Inc. Thomas N. Davidson (1) (2) (3) Chairman Quarry Hill Group Senator Michael J.L.Kirby (2) 3) The Senate of Canada (Ret.) Robert “Kam” Kamerschen (2) (3) Presiding Director Corporate Director Scott L. Kauffman (2) (3) President & COO BlueLithium Inc. Stephen M. Pustil President Penwest Development Corporation Limited François R. Roy (1) (3) Corporate Director Thomas E. Weigman (2) (3) Executive AirCell, Inc. (1) Audit Committee (2) Compensation Committee (3) Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Miles S. Nadal Chairman & Chief Executive Officer Steven Berns President & Chief Financial Officer Rob Dickson Managing Director Mitchell Gendel General Counsel & Corporate Secretary Glenn Gibson Chief Financial Officer, Canadian Marketing Communications Charles Porter Chief Strategist Graham L. Rosenberg Managing Director Michael Sabatino Senior Vice President & Chief Accounting Officer Gavin Swartzman Managing Director Transfer Agent Investor Relations Notice of Shareholders’ Meeting CIBC Mellon Trust Company CIBC Mellon Trust Company Operates a telephone information inquiry line that can be reached by dialing toll-free 1-800-387-0825 or 416-643-5500. Correspondence may be addressed to: MDC Partners Inc. c/o CIBC Mellon Trust Company Corporate Trust Services P.O. Box 7010 Adelaide Street Postal Station Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M7 For Investor Relations information, please call Donna Granato, Director of Finance & Investor Relations 646-429-1809. Stock Exchange Listing The Class A shares of the Company are listed on The Toronto Stock Exchange in Canada and the NASDAQ National Market in the United States. The Toronto Stock Exchange Trading Symbol: MDZ.A NASDAQ National Market: MDCA The annual meeting of shareholders will be held Friday, June 1, 2007 at 10:30 AM at 4 Times Square, New York, New York. [This page intentionally left blank.] 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above