Quarterlytics / Technology / Software - Application / Metro Bank

Metro Bank

mtro · LSE Technology
Claim this profile
Ticker mtro
Exchange LSE
Sector Technology
Industry Software - Application
Employees 1001-5000
← All annual reports
FY2017 Annual Report · Metro Bank
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017
METRO BANK PLC 

JOIN THE 
REVOLUTION

M

E

T

R

O

B

A

N

K

P

L

C

A

N

N

U

A

L

R

E

P

O

R

T

A

N

D

A

C

C

O

U

N

T

S

2

0

1

7

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
METRO BANK  
THE REVOLUTION  
IN BRITISH BANKING

Luton

Contents

Strategic report

02  2017 Highlights
04  Chairman’s statement
06  Strategic overview
08  Strategic summary 
10  Company overview
12  Chief Executive Officer’s statement
18  Market review
20  Creating FANs
26  Financial review
30  Risk factors and management
38  Environment and social summary

Governance

43   Corporate governance overview
44   Board of Directors
46   Directors’ report
49   Corporate governance report
54   Audit Committee report
59   Risk Oversight Committee report
62   Nomination Committee report
64   Remuneration Committee report
70  Annual report on remuneration

Financial statements

80   Independent auditors’ report to the 

members of Metro Bank PLC

87   Consolidated statement of 
comprehensive income
88   Consolidated balance sheet
89   Consolidated statement of  

changes in equity

90   Consolidated cash flow statement
91  Company balance sheet
92   Company statement of  

changes in equity

93   Company cash flow statement
94   Notes to the financial statements
132  Additional financial reporting
133  Independent auditors’ report to the 
Directors of Metro Bank PLC on 
country-by-country information
134  Alternative performance measures
136  Glossary
137  Shareholder Information

Duffy
Chief Canine Officer
@SirDuffield

01

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsOUR AMAZING GROWTH

FIVE-YEAR TRACK RECORD

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

YoY% 
increase

Assets

£1.9bn

£3.7bn

£6.1bn £10.1bn £16.4bn

+63%

Customer deposits

£1.3bn

£2.9bn

£5.1bn

£8.0bn £11.7bn

+47%

Net average deposits per store per month

£3.4m

£4.9m £5.3m

£5.7m £6.3m

+11%

Net customer loans

£0.8bn

£1.6bn

£3.5bn

£5.9bn

£9.6bn

+64%

Underlying profit/(loss) before tax

£(55.4m) £(48.9m) £(46.6m) £(11.7m) £20.8m

Statutory profit/(loss) before tax

£(52.2m) £(48.6m) £(56.8m) £(17.2m)

£18.7m

n/a

n/a

 Deposits

Net customer loans

£11.7bn

2017

£9.6bn

2017

+47%

+64%

£8.0bn

2016

£5.9bn

2016

£5.1bn

2015

£2.9bn

2014

2013

£3.5bn

2015

£1.6bn

2014

2013

02

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  2017 HIGHLIGHTS

STRATEGIC

 © Record increase in customer accounts from 

915,000 to 1,217,000

 © Net promoter score¹ of above 80% with brand 

recognition across London of 89%²

 © Delivered our promise to provide £1 billion  

of net lending to small businesses during 2017

 © Completion of a £278 million capital raise  

at market value

OPERATIONAL

 © Seven new store openings, bringing the 

revolution further north to Peterborough, 
west to Swindon and south-east to Canterbury

 © Creation of nearly 600 new roles bringing 

our total number of colleagues to over 3,000

 © 27,000 schoolchildren trained through Money 
Zone during the year, bringing the total since 
2010 to over 100,000

 © Winner of Moneywise ‘Most Trusted Financial 

Provider’ for second year in a row

FINANCIAL

 © First annual underlying profit before tax 
of £20.8 million, compared to a loss of 
£11.7 million in 20163

 © Statutory profit before tax of £18.7 million, 
compared to a loss of £17.2 million in 2016

 © Income grew by 51% over the year, compared 
to only 29% growth in operating expenses 

 © Loan to deposit ratio increased from 74% to 82%

 © Record net average deposit per store per month 

growth of £6.3 million

1  Further details on how net promoter score (‘NPS’) is calculated are available on page 136.
2  All figures, unless otherwise stated, are from YouGov Plc. Total sample size was 1004 adults. 

Fieldwork was undertaken between 8th – 12th February 2018. The figures have been weighted 
and are representative of all London adults (aged 18+).

3  Underlying profit/(loss) before tax excludes Listing Share Awards, costs associated with listing, 

impairment of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets and costs relating to RBS 
alternative remedies package application. Further details are available on page 135.

03

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsCHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT

THE REVOLUTION  
GROWS

Metro Bank, the revolution in banking, celebrates 
another year of success.

Dear shareholders, customers, 
colleagues and friends – our FANS,
Metro Bank is a power retailer created 
to redefine retail and business banking 
in Britain by delivering a unique 
customer experience with unmatched 
customer service and convenience.

The new retail paradigm is the 
experience, with customers demanding 
unique and integrated service 
delivered through every channel.

Our model is built on:
•  A differentiated, value-added 
MODEL A persuasive and 
reinforcing CULTURE

•  FANATICAL EXECUTION which 
eliminates stupid bank rules, 
AMAZES our customers and 
EXCEEDS their expectations

Metro Bank is uniquely positioned to 
exceed customer demands through:
•  55 iconic retail stores
•  Our advanced information 

technology

•  Our award-winning digital 

bank offering

Vernon W. Hill, II – Founder and Chairman

The best is yet  
to come

2010
July
Launch our first store in 
Holborn in London.

2011
Fourth quarter
Open our tenth store.

2012
Fourth quarter
Our deposit balances grow to 
£500 million and the number 
of customer accounts grows 
to 100,000.

2013
Third quarter
Our deposit balances grow 
to £1 billion, our lending 
balances grow to £500 
million. Number of stores 
grows to 20.

November
We are named ‘Bank of the 
Year’ at the City AM Awards 
in London.

Holborn

04

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  With all of the channels united to 
create FANS, not customers.

Our model is focused on creating 
FANS who:
•  Join our brand
•  Remain loyal
•  Bring their friends

Business banking in Britain is 
equally underserved. As the 
‘Entrepreneurs’ Bank’, Metro offers 
a full range of personalised credit 
and cash management services. Our 
bankers know you and you know 
them. Already business banking 
is over 50% of Metro Bank.

2017 was another record year:
•  Assets grew 63% to £16.4 billion
•  Deposits grew 47% to £11.7 billion
•  Loans grew 64% to £9.6 billion

Despite this continued success, at 
year end, Metro Bank had less than 
1% of the UK deposit market. 

Our future is unlimited, providing 
we continue to create and support 
our FANS.

At the end of 2017, over 1.2 million 
British business and retail customers 
had become Metro Bank FANS.

Many thanks to our customers, FANS, 
colleagues, directors and investors.

THE BEST IS YET TO COME.

Vernon W. Hill, II
Founder and Chairman
1 March 2018

Investors continue to embrace 
Metro Bank.
•  From our public listing in March 2016 
to 28 February 2018, MTRO is up 98% 
to £35.84

•  For 2017, share price ended at £35.84 

up 22.5%

•  Our annual shareholder return is 45%
•  With year- end market capitalisation 

of £3.2 billion, Metro Bank is the most 
highly valued British bank other than 
the four legacy banks

2014
Third quarter
The number of customer 
accounts grows to 400,000. 
The number of stores grows 
to 30.

2017
May
We open our one millionth 
customer account on early 
May bank holiday while other 
banks are shut.

June 
We are voted “Moneywise 
most trusted financial 
provider” for second 
consecutive year.

July
£278 million capital raise, 
oversubscribed and at full 
market price.

Fourth quarter
Our deposit balance grows to 
£11 billion. We open our 55th 
store in Swindon.

Over 100,000 children have 
now completed Money Zone, 
our financial education 
programme.

December
Voted Glassdoor top 
50 employer.

2015
Third quarter
Our deposit balances grow to 
£4 billion, and we are named 
top Gold winner in Fairer 
Finance’s league table of 
bank accounts.

Fourth quarter
We are awarded a Microsoft 
‘Visionary’ award for 
innovative use of technology.

Fourth quarter
Our deposit balances grow to 
£5 billion; our lending 
balances grow to £3.5 billion; 
and the number of stores 
grows to 40.

2016
March
Listing on London Stock 
Exchange.

June
Our CEO Craig Donaldson 
ranked number one in 
Glassdoor’s Highest Rated 
CEOs 2016.

June: 
We are voted ‘Moneywise 
most trusted financial 
provider’.

November
Launch of our game-
changing commercial 
banking platform.

05

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsSTRATEGIC OVERVIEW

OUR UNIQUE MODEL:  
IT’S ALL ABOUT CREATING FANS

Store  
expansion

•  Thinking like retailers while being 

the most professional banker

•  Stores open ‘early until late’, 

362 days a year

•  24/7 telephony, 365 days a year

•  With instant fulfilment – ‘walk out 

working’ with debit and credit cards

See more on page 20

Integrated 
technology

•  With real-time processing enabling 

real-time fulfilment

•  Making customers’ lives easier

•  Offering customers their channel 

of choice

•  Mobile app, internet, telephony 

and store

See more on page 22

Unique 
culture

•  AMAZEING behaviours

•  Where we ‘hire for attitude, train 

for skill’

•  With colleague empowerment – 

‘no stupid rules’

•  Where everyone’s an owner

•  And part of the community 

we serve

See more on page 24

INVESTING IN

STORE 
EXPANSION

INTEGRATED 
TECHNOLOGY

Creating 
FANS 
generates...

Creates FANS

Surprising and delighting every customer:

•  With consistent and transparent propositions 

that reward and encourage loyalty

•  With banking focused on both personal 

customers and entrepreneurs

UNIQUE
CULTURE

06

CREATES 
FANS...

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  LONG-TERM  
VALUE

...long-term 
value for 
everybody

AND FANS 
BRING...

Long-term 
value

•  By building a trusted franchise and 
brand by doing the right thing for 
all stakeholders

•  Diversified across retail, 

commercial and private banking

•  Providing reliable income growth 

at low risk

•  With a cost base focused on 

creating and supporting FANS

See more on page 26

LENDING

Lending

•  Which is low risk and diversified, 
creating a positive net interest 
margin 

•  To retail, business, commercial 

and private customers 

•  Across overdrafts, credit cards, 
unsecured lending, mortgages, 
asset and invoice finance and money 
management account

See more on page 08

Deposits

•  Which are diversified, sticky and 

low cost 

•  From retail, business, commercial 

and private customers

•  Across current accounts, fixed and 
variable savings (and, of course, we 
shouldn’t forget instant access safe 
deposit boxes)

See more on page 08

FANS

•  Create advocacy and referral

•  Tell their friends, family and 

colleagues to join us

•  Bring more and stay longer as 
they join us for what we are

DEPOSITS

07

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsSTRATEGIC SUMMARY

PUTTING OUR  
CUSTOMERS FIRST

Our objective is to keep surprising and delighting our FANS 
and profitably growing our business. We do this by investing 
in our colleagues, technology and stores.

Strategic focus

Progress

Integrated model
We create FANS by ‘surprising and delighting’ 
customers across every channel – through 
integrating physical and digital channels through 
our technology and amazing colleagues.

See more on page 06

London Evening Standard Business Awards 2017

Financial Services Company of the Year

We opened seven new stores in 2017, expanding our network to new 
areas including Canterbury and Peterborough.

We’ve continued to launch revolutionary improvements in our digital 
and technological capability which included building our application 
programming interface (‘API’) layer and the development of our 
Current Account Online system which went live in January 2018. 

We appointed our first Chief Information Officer, Martyn Atkinson, 
to the Executive Committee in August to ensure that technology 
remains a fundamental component of our model.

Unique culture
We recruit, train and lead our colleagues to 
deliver our unique value-added model and 
create FANS in each of our communities. 

See more on page 24

UK Social Mobility Awards 2017

Progression Programme of the Year

Diversified, sticky,  
low-cost deposits
We attract deposits through our integrated 
model and unique culture which creates FANS.

Moneywise Customer Service Awards 2017
Most Trusted Savings & Cash ISA Provider

Low-risk,  
diversified lending

We offer simple lending products that meet the 
personal and business needs of our customers. 
Our customer-centric underwriting process 
aims to ensure a low-risk loan book, which is 
the foundation of long-term growth.

Corporate Livewire Finance Awards 2017

Business Lender of the Year

Culture is at the heart of our business and starts the moment anyone 
joins us. All colleagues attend visions cultural training on their first two 
days at Metro Bank, followed by up to a further six weeks of training for 
customer service roles, and then, of course, regular training after that.

We opened our seventh in-house training centre, Metro Bank 
University, at Ilford during the year. Every single colleague received 
training during the year and we’re the only bank that offers all our 
store and contact centre advisors the chance to gain a professional 
qualification with the Chartered Banker Institute.

We’re always proud to become a part of each community that we 
serve. We host regular networking and community events, including 
educating schoolchildren through Money Zone and supporting 
local charities.

Customer deposits grew by 47% to £11.7 billion at 31 December 2017 
(2016: £8.0 billion), while deposit growth per store per month was a 
record £6.3 million for the year.

We continued to see record growth in customer account numbers, 
surpassing one million for the first time. At 31 December 2017 we had 
1,217,000 customer accounts.

This increase in accounts and deposits has been achieved at a record 
low cost, with cost of deposits for the year of 54bp (2016: 79bp)

Non-interest bearing liabilities, in the form of current accounts, have 
grown 61% during the year and represent 32% of deposits.

Total loans grew 63% to £9.6 billion at 31 December 2017 (2016: £5.9 
billion). Loans to commercial customers represent 33% of total lending 
as of 31 December 2017 with a stable average debt to value ratio of 
below 60% during the year. Our mortgage book grew substantially to 
£6,231 million, driven primarily through organic lending supplemented 
by the purchase of a portfolio of UK mortgages for c£600 million. 
We of course delivered our promise to provide £1 billion of net lending 
to small businesses during the year.

Cost of risk remains stable at 0.11% (2016: 0.10%) due to high quality, 
low risk lending. Our debt to value (‘DTV’) on residential mortgages  
is only 60% (2016: 58%) and on commercial term loans is 58%  
(2016: 57%).

08

NUMBER OF STORES

ANDROID AND APPLE PAY 

MOBILE BANKING LOG-INS

•  Open 12 new stores including 

Outlook for 2018

Key risks 

we manage

COLLEAGUES PROMOTED  

VOICE OF COLLEAGUE 

COLLEAGUE HOURS OF 

•  Build on our AMAZEING culture 

TRANSACTIONS

1.8m

(2016: 760,000)

WHOLE BANK NET 

PROMOTER SCORE

>80%

RESULTS 

96% 

596

(2016: 489)

33m

(2016: 769,000)

SCORE

91%

(2016: 78%)

RETAIL ACCOUNT 

OPENINGS NET PROMOTER 

growing the network into 

the South-west, Wales and 

the Midlands.

•  Expand our network via our 

Current Account Online product, 

enabling us to create FANS of 

those who can’t reach a store as 

well as driving greater national 

brand awareness.

TRAINING

>181,000

>55,000

computer based

(2016: 47,000)

through colleague training, 

AMAZEING reviews and 

opportunities for promotion.

•  Expand our apprenticeship 

programme, generating 

long-term careers with plenty 

of progression potential.

•  Create 900 new jobs as we 

continue our growth.

•  Enhance relationships within our 

new and existing communities.

of colleagues think Metro 

face-to-face

Bank is a great place to work

(2016: 134,000)

CHILDREN EDUCATED 

JOBS CREATED

THROUGH MONEY-ZONE

KPIs

55

(2016: 48)

ACCOUNTS OPENED

302,000

(2016: 260,000)

IN THE YEAR

640

(2016: 500)

27,000

(2016: 24,000)

RETAIL/COMMERCIAL 

AT 31 DEC 17 (DEPOSITS)

£5,476m

£6,193m

COST OF DEPOSITS 

DEPOSITS 

£11.7bn 

up 47% from 2016

0.54% 

(2016: 0.79%)

DEPOSIT GROWTH PER 

STORE PER MONTH 

£6.3m 

(2016: £5.7m)

NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS 

1,217,000 

(2016: 915,000)

•  Continue to attract sticky 

deposits while maintaining  

a low cost of deposits.

•  Promote organic growth by 

attracting FANS and deposits 

through new and existing  

stores and through Current 

Account Online.

Commercial 

Retail 

53% 

43% 

RETAIL/COMMERCIAL 

AT 31 DEC 17 

(GROSS LENDING)

£6,433m

£3,187m

Commercial 

Retail 

33% 

67% 

LENDING 

£9.6bn 

up 64% from 2016

COST OF RISK 

0.11% 

(2016: 0.10%)

CUSTOMER NET INTEREST 

MARGIN 

2.19% 

(2016: 2.13%)

LOAN TO DEPOSIT RATIO

•  Maintain growth trajectory in 

82% 

(2016: 74%)

60% 

(2016: 58%)

AVERAGE DEBT TO VALUE 

(RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGES)

our loan to deposit ratio, while 

maintaining a cost of risk in line 

with target of c.0.2%.

•  Continue to support lending to 

new and existing business and 

commercial customers. 

•  Renew our pledge to lend 

another £1 billion to Britain’s 

SMEs.

1

5

7

4

6

8

2

3

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC   
 
 
 
Strategic focus

Progress

Integrated model

We create FANS by ‘surprising and delighting’ 

customers across every channel – through 

integrating physical and digital channels through 

our technology and amazing colleagues.

See more on page 06

London Evening Standard Business Awards 2017

Financial Services Company of the Year

We opened seven new stores in 2017, expanding our network to new 

areas including Canterbury and Peterborough.

We’ve continued to launch revolutionary improvements in our digital 

and technological capability which included building our application 

programming interface (‘API’) layer and the development of our 

Current Account Online system which went live in January 2018. 

We appointed our first Chief Information Officer, Martyn Atkinson, 

to the Executive Committee in August to ensure that technology 

remains a fundamental component of our model.

Unique culture

We recruit, train and lead our colleagues to 

deliver our unique value-added model and 

create FANS in each of our communities. 

See more on page 24

UK Social Mobility Awards 2017

Progression Programme of the Year

Diversified, sticky,  

low-cost deposits

We attract deposits through our integrated 

model and unique culture which creates FANS.

Moneywise Customer Service Awards 2017

Most Trusted Savings & Cash ISA Provider

Low-risk,  

diversified lending

We offer simple lending products that meet the 

personal and business needs of our customers. 

Our customer-centric underwriting process 

aims to ensure a low-risk loan book, which is 

the foundation of long-term growth.

Corporate Livewire Finance Awards 2017

Business Lender of the Year

Culture is at the heart of our business and starts the moment anyone 

joins us. All colleagues attend visions cultural training on their first two 

days at Metro Bank, followed by up to a further six weeks of training for 

customer service roles, and then, of course, regular training after that.

We opened our seventh in-house training centre, Metro Bank 

University, at Ilford during the year. Every single colleague received 

training during the year and we’re the only bank that offers all our 

store and contact centre advisors the chance to gain a professional 

qualification with the Chartered Banker Institute.

We’re always proud to become a part of each community that we 

serve. We host regular networking and community events, including 

educating schoolchildren through Money Zone and supporting 

local charities.

Customer deposits grew by 47% to £11.7 billion at 31 December 2017 

(2016: £8.0 billion), while deposit growth per store per month was a 

record £6.3 million for the year.

We continued to see record growth in customer account numbers, 

surpassing one million for the first time. At 31 December 2017 we had 

1,217,000 customer accounts.

This increase in accounts and deposits has been achieved at a record 

low cost, with cost of deposits for the year of 54bp (2016: 79bp)

Non-interest bearing liabilities, in the form of current accounts, have 

grown 61% during the year and represent 32% of deposits.

Total loans grew 63% to £9.6 billion at 31 December 2017 (2016: £5.9 

billion). Loans to commercial customers represent 33% of total lending 

as of 31 December 2017 with a stable average debt to value ratio of 

below 60% during the year. Our mortgage book grew substantially to 

£6,231 million, driven primarily through organic lending supplemented 

by the purchase of a portfolio of UK mortgages for c£600 million. 

We of course delivered our promise to provide £1 billion of net lending 

to small businesses during the year.

Cost of risk remains stable at 0.11% (2016: 0.10%) due to high quality, 

low risk lending. Our debt to value (‘DTV’) on residential mortgages  

is only 60% (2016: 58%) and on commercial term loans is 58%  

(2016: 57%).

See more 
on page 32

Key risks 
we manage

1

5

7

4

6

8

2

3

KPIs

NUMBER OF STORES

55

(2016: 48)

ACCOUNTS OPENED

302,000

(2016: 260,000)

ANDROID AND APPLE PAY 
TRANSACTIONS

1.8m

(2016: 760,000)

WHOLE BANK NET 
PROMOTER SCORE

>80%

MOBILE BANKING LOG-INS

33m

(2016: 769,000)

RETAIL ACCOUNT 
OPENINGS NET PROMOTER 
SCORE

91%

(2016: 78%)

COLLEAGUES PROMOTED  
IN THE YEAR

VOICE OF COLLEAGUE 
RESULTS 

COLLEAGUE HOURS OF 
TRAINING

640

(2016: 500)

96% 

of colleagues think Metro 
Bank is a great place to work

CHILDREN EDUCATED 
THROUGH MONEY-ZONE

27,000

(2016: 24,000)

JOBS CREATED

596

(2016: 489)

>181,000

face-to-face
(2016: 134,000)

>55,000

computer based
(2016: 47,000)

Outlook for 2018

•  Open 12 new stores including 
growing the network into 
the South-west, Wales and 
the Midlands.

•  Expand our network via our 

Current Account Online product, 
enabling us to create FANS of 
those who can’t reach a store as 
well as driving greater national 
brand awareness.

•  Build on our AMAZEING culture 
through colleague training, 
AMAZEING reviews and 
opportunities for promotion.

•  Expand our apprenticeship 
programme, generating 
long-term careers with plenty 
of progression potential.

•  Create 900 new jobs as we 

continue our growth.

•  Enhance relationships within our 
new and existing communities.

RETAIL/COMMERCIAL 
AT 31 DEC 17 (DEPOSITS)

DEPOSITS 

£11.7bn 

up 47% from 2016

£5,476m

£6,193m

COST OF DEPOSITS 

Commercial 
Retail 

53% 
43% 

RETAIL/COMMERCIAL 
AT 31 DEC 17 
(GROSS LENDING)

£6,433m

£3,187m

0.54% 

(2016: 0.79%)

LENDING 

£9.6bn 

up 64% from 2016

COST OF RISK 

0.11% 

(2016: 0.10%)

Commercial 
Retail 

33% 
67% 

CUSTOMER NET INTEREST 
MARGIN 

2.19% 

(2016: 2.13%)

DEPOSIT GROWTH PER 
STORE PER MONTH 

£6.3m 

(2016: £5.7m)

NUMBER OF ACCOUNTS 

1,217,000 

(2016: 915,000)

•  Continue to attract sticky 

deposits while maintaining  
a low cost of deposits.

•  Promote organic growth by 
attracting FANS and deposits 
through new and existing  
stores and through Current 
Account Online.

LOAN TO DEPOSIT RATIO

•  Maintain growth trajectory in 

82% 

(2016: 74%)

AVERAGE DEBT TO VALUE 
(RESIDENTIAL MORTGAGES)

60% 

(2016: 58%)

our loan to deposit ratio, while 
maintaining a cost of risk in line 
with target of c.0.2%.

•  Continue to support lending to 
new and existing business and 
commercial customers. 

•  Renew our pledge to lend 

another £1 billion to Britain’s 
SMEs.

09

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements 
 
 
 
COMPANY OVERVIEW

A HIGH-GROWTH RETAILER

We’ve built a different kind of bank – one with stores that are 
open seven days a week, and where customers can walk in 
without an appointment and walk out with everything 
working straight away; so no waiting around for the postman. 

We believe in offering simple, trusted products which are 
easily understood by our customers. They know that if it 
matters to them, it matters to us. From their money and their 

data, to the personal possessions in their safe deposit box, 
customers can count on us to keep their property safe.

Every day, we support people and power businesses 
across the country. We do this by offering unparalleled 
levels of customer service both through market-leading 
digital channels and our colleagues in our expanding 
high street presence.

WHERE WE CREATE FANS…

FANS

Services we offer

Retail
We were founded on the principle that customers should 
be able to bank when and where it suits them. That’s why 
our stores are open seven days a week, from early until 
late. Customers can manage their money online or on the 
move with our award-winning mobile app. 

Business
We’re the entrepreneurs’ bank and we deliver quickly – 
without unnecessary bureaucracy. We’ve designed our 
Business Banking products and services to take the hassle 
out of everyday tasks, providing straightforward and 
flexible finance to support businesses growing. 

•  Simple savings and current accounts
•  Easily accessible safe deposit boxes
•  Debit and credit cards printed in store
•  Mortgages
•  Free coin counting for customers and non-customers alike

•  Current accounts, deposit and lending products with  

no jargon

•  Invoice and asset financing to help customers grow their 

businesses and manage cash flows

•  Based within the communities we serve, with dedicated 

local business managers

Private
Simple is often best. The same can be said of our private 
products and services. We’ve designed them to get the 
job done quickly, easily and without fuss. No wealth 
management, no insurance – just banking. Our 
Relationship Managers are on hand to set up our 
customers’ banking just the way they like it.

Commercial
We believe in a different type of commercial banking – 
the type that provides customers with their own 
Relationship Manager. This is somebody who knows 
and understands the business – an individual who will 
specialise in your sector and your needs.

•  Specialist teams including sports & entertainment, 

professionals, senior executives and commercial private 
clients who understand our customers’ banking needs

•  Personal service

•  Commercial loans and cash management
•  Instant, fixed term and tracker deposit accounts
•  Specialist sector teams including healthcare, hospitality 

and leisure, property and charity and not-for-profit

10

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  IT’S THE EXPERIENCE…

ONLINE

ON THE APP

Our simple and secure online banking allows customers to 
manage cards and savings, browse transactions, open new 
accounts – all from the comfort of the sofa. Customers can 
even open current accounts online, irrespective of where in 
the UK they live. If they live near a store, they can also opt to 
pop in and have their card printed on the spot. Just one of 
many examples of how we are seamlessly integrating bricks 
and clicks.

Our award-winning mobile banking app launched in 
December 2016. This year has seen a raft of new features 
added, including a spending summary tool, fingerprint login 
capabilities and standing order set-up. The app has already 
won several awards, including Best Mobile Banking app 
(Moneywise Customer Service Awards 2017).

78%  of customers registered for online banking 

22   log-ins to our app per user per month

FAN TOUCH 
POINTS
We believe in offering customers 
a choice of how they bank with 
us. However they engage with 
us, we promise to always make 
it straightforward and simple.

IN STORE

OVER THE PHONE

Our stores are open early until late, seven days a week, 
362 days a year with friendly colleagues ready to help. 
Every store has a Magic Money Machine to count coins. 

55  stores and counting

Our call centres are London-based and our colleagues are 
available day or night. We don’t believe in annoying automated 
telephone menus to navigate, so we put customers through to 
a human.

Over 1.5m  calls to AMAZE direct in 2017

11

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S STATEMENT

A YEAR OF GROWTH AND 
FANATICAL EXECUTION

2017 was another unbelievable year 
of growth for Metro Bank. 

We have had a great year:
•  Growing to over 1.2 million customer 

accounts

•  Growing to over £11.6 billion of 

deposits 

•  Lending over £9.6 billion to personal 
and business customers, with over 
£1 billion in the fourth quarter alone

•  Creating nearly 600 jobs taking 

the total number of colleagues to 
over 3,000

•  Expanding our award winning store 

network to 55 stores

•  Launching our award winning new 

mobile offering 

•  Being voted Most Trusted Financial 

Provider for the second year running

•  Achieving our first full year of profit

Our strategy remains the same: to 
be a high-growth retailer with a 
differentiated business model that 
integrates our innovative digital 
offering with fanatical physical 
delivery, delivered by colleagues who 
embody our AMAZEING culture.

And it’s working. By surprising and 
delighting our customers and creating 
FANS, we earned a Net Promoter 
Score of over 80% in 2017. Our FANS 
are telling their friends and family 
about us, spreading the revolution 
through word of mouth, with our brand 
recognition rising to 89% London.

This means we are winning our 
personal and business customers 
through recommendation and as 
we surprise and delight them we 
create even more FANS who stay 
with us longer and recommend 
more of their friends, family and 
colleagues to join us – thank you.

Craig Donaldson – Chief Executive Officer

We’ve celebrated our 
millionth customer account, 
been voted Most Trusted 
Financial Provider for 
the second year running, 
and delivered our first 
annual profit

Moneywise 2017
Most Trusted Financial Provider

12

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC   
We’re the entrepreneur’s 
bank and delivered on our 
commitment of over £1bn of 
new lending to business and 
commercial customers

This was achieved while reducing our cost of deposits from 
0.79% to 0.54%, the lowest ever level, bearing testament to 
our belief that customers will trade lower rates for a better 
service experience. We’ve seen 61% year-on-year growth in 
sticky current accounts, the engine of our organisation, which 
now total 32% of our deposit base and provide a clear funding 
advantage in a rising rate environment.

Record lending growth
Both the momentum and quality of our lending have been 
strong. Building a bank for the long term requires fanatical 
focus on the right type of lending, without trading volume for 
quality. We achieved a 64% increase in lending year-on-year 
to £9,620 million across retail and commercial, while 
maintaining a low and stable 0.11% cost of risk and average 
debt to value ratios of c.60%.

RETAIL: 67%

COMMERCIAL: 33%

£6.4bn

£3.2bn

Residential mortgages  
£4.5bn
Residential mortgages BTL  £1.7bn
£0.2bn
Customer leading 

Commercial loans  
Professional BTL 
Asset & invoice finance 

£2.0bn
£1.0bn
£0.2bn

I’m particularly proud of the way that we’ve continued to 
support the small and medium sized enterprises (‘SME’) 
sector. At the start of the year, we committed to providing 
£1 billion of net new lending to businesses during 2017 – 
a promise we not only delivered on but renewed for 2018. 

Long term capital planning
From a capital perspective our growth was supported by an 
equity raise of £278 million in July 2017. Shareholders 
responded overwhelmingly, with shares issued at the market 
price on the date of issue. We have submitted our application 
to the PRA to be eligible to apply advanced internal rating-
based (‘AIRB’) capital requirements to our residential 
mortgage portfolio. A successful application will ensure 
appropriate capital efficiency to support our future lending.

Powering from strength to strength 
Metro Bank has had a fantastic year, growing across every 
area of the business. Our geographical expansion, integrated 
with cutting-edge technology, is reinforcing our network and 
attracting retail and commercial customers. We’ve generated 
both record deposit and record lending growth, closing the 
year with our highest ever loan to deposit ratio of 82%. This 
has in turn increased revenue by 51% year-on-year and led to 
a £32.5 million uplift in profitability to £20.8 million from a 
£11.7 million loss in 2016. 

Record deposit growth
More FANS are trusting us with more of their money. Deposits 
surpassed £10 billion for the first time, increasing by £3.7 
billion over the year to £11,669 million. Over 300,000 
customer accounts were opened during the year and the 
average balance increased by 10% to £9,588.

Deposits

Commercial
Retail

Average deposits per 
customer

Net average deposits per 
store per month

% Current accounts

2017 

2016 

Change

£11.7bn
53%
47%

£8.0bn
50%
50%

47%

£9,588

£8,689

10%

£6.3m

£5.7m

32%

29%

11%

n/a

Cost of deposits

0.54%

0.79%

(25)bps

Deposit growth has been fastest among business customers, 
particularly small and medium-sized enterprises which 
we believe are the most under served in the market. 
These commercial deposits grew 55% to represent 
53% of our deposit base, bringing with it the associated 
transaction fees. In our current heartland of London and 
the South East we are winning 17% of SME business current 
account switchers and will continue to strengthen our 
presence in the sector, as well as entering new markets 
where we will bring further competition and choice.

Our iconic stores generated deposit growth of £6.3 million 
per store per month over the year, up from £5.7 million 
in 2016. Every store across our network has grown its 
deposit base year-on-year, and we now have three stores 
which have generated more than £400 million of deposits. 
Comparative store deposit growth remains strong at 43% 
for stores open over 12 months; 39% for stores open over 
24 months; and 35% for stores open over 36 months.

13

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements 
  
 
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S STATEMENT CONTINUED

Our 55 stores act as real hubs  
for the local community

Fanatical execution and a unique culture
At Metro Bank, the culture is owned by everybody and is what 
sets us apart from the rest. We’re fanatical about creating 
the right culture for long-term success. A truly differentiated 
approach to banking starts with hiring for attitude and 
training for skill, investing in training and development 
where core values are reinforced, and rewarding colleagues 
based on their AMAZEING behaviours. By creating FANS 
of our colleagues, they make FANS of our customers – 
and this is what the banking revolution is all about.

We commit to the career of each of our colleagues – and 
during the year provided them with nearly 900 training 
courses through our in-house training facility, Metro Bank 
University. We’re the only bank that offers all our store and 
contact centre advisers the chance to gain a professional 
qualification with the Chartered Banker Institute. We also 
operate an apprenticeship programme to support young 

people to start a career in banking. We also give all our 
apprentices a permanent job with us.

Protecting our culture as we grow is key. We like to promote 
from within, which means that we always look for internal 
candidates before searching externally. Each new store 
creates c.25 new jobs within the local community – and 
during 2017 we promoted over 600 colleagues. It’s inspiring 
to see the 29 colleagues who began their journey at Metro 
Bank as cashiers or customer service representatives who 
have now been promoted to store manager or more 
senior positions. 

Each of our colleagues is dedicated to supporting the 
communities that we serve. Our stores act as real hubs for the 
local community, with hundreds of networking and charity 
events hosted in them throughout the year, as well as our free 
financial education programme, Money Zone, which taught 
money basics to more than 27,000 students in 2017.

14

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Customers want choice  
and instant fulfilment

Seamlessly integrating bricks and clicks 
Customers tell us time after time that they want the option to 
choose how, when and where they engage with our services 
– whether in store, via the app, over the phone or online. Our 
cultural, customer-led approach applies across all channels.

This year, we continued to expand our network both inside 
and outside London. We are currently building our 56th store 
in Watford, and expect to expand our network by a total of 12 
stores in 2018. We’re excited to open new markets in Cardiff, 
Bristol, Birmingham and beyond in the coming months.

Award-winning, legacy-free IT platforms enable us to 
deliver a faster, more informed and more secure service to 
customers without friction across multiple channels and 
systems. Real-time data processing enables fulfilment at 
the point of sale for today’s ‘now’ culture, and we continue 
to invest in our digital capability so we can adapt to 
changing consumer behaviours and preferences. Whether 
that’s simple tweaks that make life that bit easier for our 
customers, like using contactless technology with our 
Magic Money Machines, or developing state-of-the-art 
Current Account Online opening using ‘selfie’ technology 
for identification and verification and allowing customers to 
choose to collect their card in store or be sent in the post. 

Behind the scenes we’re constantly looking to improve 
the safety and security of our customers. Aided by our 
top-of-the-range systems and ability to see a single view 
of all a customer’s banking products, we’re continually 
improving our fraud analytics, thereby helping to target 

fraudsters before they’re able to act. Our bespoke telephony 
systems incorporate a range of market-leading fraud 
detection platforms. We take looking after customers’ 
data just as seriously as looking after their deposits.

In further developments, we’ve successfully developed a 
bank-wide application programme interface (‘API’) layer 
to support client data requests and get ready for the 
opportunities the open banking revolution presents.

Our 2017 awards
There’s so much to be proud of at Metro Bank: the 
entrepreneurs we support to grow their businesses; the 
families we help to buy their homes; the jobs we create and 
the contribution we make to local communities. We’ve also 
been privileged to again receive a wide range of awards 
during the year, recognising our commitment to providing 
outstanding service in every channel. These awards underline 
the fact that great service is about meeting the needs of our 
customers, however they want to do business with us – on 
the go, in our stores or over the phone – and by providing 
products that can be trusted. 

For the second year in a row, we were voted the Moneywise 
‘Most Trusted Financial Provider’, a real validation of how we 
are viewed by the British public. We also won the Moneywise 
award for ‘Best Mobile Banking app’, demonstrating just how 
well we’re able to integrate all facets of our business. We were 
named a Glassdoor Top 50 employer in the UK and, to top it 
off, we won ‘Financial Services Company of the Year’ at the 
London Evening Standard Business Awards 2017.

Our 2017 awards

Most Trusted
Financial Provider

Financial Services
Company of the Year

Craig Donaldson - Most People
Focused CEO of the Year

Best Debit Card for 
use abroad

Best Current Account
Provider for Branch Service

Best Mobile Banking App

Most Trusted Savings
and Cash ISA Provider

Progression Programme 
of the Year

Best Customer Focus

Best Business Account

15

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements 
 
 
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S STATEMENT CONTINUED

Stores

40

48

55

140-160

c.100

2015

2016

2017

2020 Target 2023 Target

Deposit growth per store per month (£m)

c£5.5-6.5

c£5.5-6.5

£6.3

£5.7

£5.3

Looking to 2020 and beyond
We delivered on our commitment to announce our first full 
year of profitability in 2017. As we approach 2020, we have 
refined our 2020 targets to reflect the progress we have made 
so far: 
•  Following sustained outperformance, we increased 

deposits per store per month from c.£5.25 million to 
£5.5-6.5 million. We adjusted the store outlook from c.110 
to c.100 as we anticipate reaching the same total deposit 
with slightly fewer stores in 2020. 

•  To reflect the momentum of the lending and market 

opportunities we see, we increased our loan to deposit ratio 
from c.85% to 85-90% 

•  We are adjusting the 2020 NIM + fees guidance of c.3% to 
be customer deposit NIM + fees. When we announced the 
targets in early 2016, TFS did not exist and has had a 
distortive effect on NIM, so we believe this metric more 
accurately reflects the underlying business performance.

2015

2016

2017

2020 Target 2023 Target

Our 2020 targets are:

Deposits (£bn)

Target

Stores

£50-55

2020

c.100

Deposit growth per store per month

£5.5-6.5m

£5.1

£8.0

£11.7

c.£27.5

2015

2016

2017

2020 Target 2023 Target

Loan: Deposit ratio (%)

Loan to deposit ratio

Customer NIM + fees

Underlying cost to income ratio

Cost of Risk

Leverage ratio

ROE

85-90%

c.3%

c.60%

c.0.20%

>4.0%

c.14%

85-90

85-90

82

As we approach 2020, I wanted to share the longer-term vision, 
so we are also introducing guidance on the next staging post 
in our growth.

74

69

Target

Deposits

Stores

2015

2016

2017

2020 Target 2023 Target

Deposit growth per store per month

Underlying Cost: Income ratio (%)

133

104

90

Loan to deposit ratio

Customer NIM + fees

Underlying cost to income ratio

Cost of Risk

Leverage ratio

c60

55-58

ROE

2023

£50-55bn

140-160

£5.5- 6.5m

85-90%

c.3%

55-58%

0.15-0.30%

>4.0%

17-19%

2015

2016

2017

2020 Target 2023 Target

And that’s still only the beginning of what we can achieve.

16

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  We are investing and  
improving every day.  
There is so much more to come

Changes to the Board
This year we welcomed Monique Melis to our Board as an 
independent Non-Executive Director. Monique brings a 
wealth of financial services and regulatory experience across 
established and growth markets.

We were also sad to announce the retirement of our Chief 
Financial Officer (‘CFO’), Mike Brierley. I am really sorry to lose 
Mike from the Metro Bank family. He has been on the journey 
with us from the very start, and without his knowledge, hard 
work and business acumen, it would have been even harder 
and definitely a lot less fun building Metro Bank.

I look forward to him joining the team and helping us take 
the Bank nationwide.

In summary
It gives me immense pride to report our first annual profit, as 
we continue to grow towards our 2020 vision and to deliver 
value for all our FANS. 

On behalf of the Board, I’d like to extend my sincere thanks 
to our shareholders and our tremendous colleagues – 
as well as to the British businesses and public who have 
so overwhelmingly embraced the revolution in banking.

Mike retires at the end of March 2018 and will be replaced 
by David Arden who joins us from Sainsbury’s Bank. The 
appointment of David marks a new chapter in the Metro 
Bank story. David’s distinctive blend of retailing and banking 
experience made him the natural choice to be our CFO and 

Craig Donaldson
Chief Executive Officer
1 March 2018

17

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsMARKET REVIEW

AN EXCITING FUTURE

Since 2010, we have established ourself as the dominant 
new entrant in the UK banking market for personal and 
business customers, bringing a genuine alternative to 
the established high street banks and delivering 
exceptional growth.

PLC Awards
New Company of the  
Year Award

The UK banking market is ripe for 
disruption. We are proud to be the 
only new entrant to the high street, 
offering business and retail customers 
a real choice and shaking up the 
competition. A mere seven years 
since launch, through the aftermath 
of the financial crisis, we have opened 
over 1 million customer accounts, 
have over £16 billion of assets and 
have achieved our first full year of 
profitability. And we’ve only just begun.

Change in the UK banking industry 
is long overdue. Century-old banks 
are adapting to a changing consumer 
whose expectations of their banks are 
quite rightly increasing. In today’s ‘now’ 
culture, customers crave choice and 
instant fulfilment – banking wherever, 
however and whenever they chose. 
A legacy-free bank like ours, with 
state-of-the-art real-time technology 
and prime retail stores open when 

our customers want, is perfectly 
positioned to take market share. 

UK banking deposits
£bn

The UK has a large, attractive banking 
market
The UK has a large, well developed 
banking market that continues to 
grow, supported by the strength of the 
UK economy. Our goals are to reach 
£27.5 billion of deposits by 2020 and 
to continue to grow after that. £100 
billion of deposits represents only 4% 
of the current market. In 2017, our 
total deposits and loans grew 47% 
and 64% respectively, standing at 
£11.7 billion and £9.6 billion in total. 
This creates the perfect platform for 
us to continue to grow from, winning 
customers who are dissatisfied with 
how their existing banks treat them.

In November, the Bank of England 
increased interest rates for the first time 
in over ten years, from 0.25% to 0.5%, 

2,284 

Dec 2017

Source: Bank of England.

UK lending
£bn

2,382 

Dec 2017

11.7 
Metro Bank 
Dec 2017

9.6 
Metro Bank 
Dec 2017

Source: Bank of England.

UK mortgages
£bn

1,367 

Dec 2017

6.2 
Metro Bank 
Dec 2017

Source: Bank of England.

18

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  in order to address increasing inflation. 
This was accompanied by an indication 
of a further two rate rises before 2020. 
Our deposit led strategy produces 
high volumes of low-cost, sticky 
deposits; our service quality means 
customers choose to join and stay 
with us. Our strategy creates a naturally 
hedged balance sheet, and future 
rate rises represent an opportunity.

In it’s June Financial Stability Report, the 
Bank of England highlighted concerns 
about the level of unsecured consumer 
lending, requiring banks to hold more 
than £10bn of additional capital to 
prepare for potential adverse changes. 
We had already begun reducing our 
exposure to consumer lending due to 
concerns about pricing compression 
relative to the risk involved. Only 2% of 
our lending is in unsecured consumer 
credit, and we have no customers 
with interest free periods on credit 
cards; the impact of any market-
wide deterioration will be relatively 
low on our current balance sheet.

In addition to our current footprint, 
there is a big opportunity across 
the UK banking market. Our current 
store network only covers 26% of 
the SME market. Store numbers have 
now reached 55, with expansion 
as far west as Swindon and as far 
north as Peterborough. The chart 
below illustrates the potential for 
further growth nationally and 
the opportunities it presents.

Customers want an integrated experience
Major high street banks continue to 
close branches. During 2017, the big five 
UK banks reported that they planned 
to close 482 branches¹. While these 
banks don’t value branches, customers 
do. A recent Accenture Survey² found 
that 20% of customers visited a bank 
branch weekly, and that millennials 
were the demographic most likely to 
visit a branch (23% did so weekly). This 
demonstrates the continued necessity 
of being able to provide face-to-face 
services and advice. Our investment in 
stores in prime retail locations where 
customers can “walk out working” or 
speak to their business manager without 
an appointment creates compelling 
service advantage over our competitors.

Digital banking is expanding rapidly. 
Online banking represents the most 
common way retail customers engage 
with their bank, while mobile banking is 
the most popular channel for younger 
customers. This demonstrates the 
need to invest in a multi-channel 
experience; customers should be able 
to access their banking services the 
way they want to, and benefit from 
a consistently positive experience 
across all channels. Our strategy has 
always reflected this growing trend, 
resulting in continuously market 
leading NPS scores from customers.

Business banking customers are also 
looking for leading service. While 
charging levels are an important factor 
for businesses, smaller SMEs also cite 
convenience (store location and hours) 

Aberdeen

Glasgow

Edinburgh

Metro Bank Stores

Top 30% SME regions3

Durham
Durham

Hull/York Corridor

Bradford

Leeds

Kirklees

Sheffield

South Manchester

Trafford
Stockport
Manchester

Liverpool

Northwich

Shrewsbury

Birmingham

Peterborough

as a leading criteria for choosing a bank, 
while larger SMEs focussed on high quality 
personalised service and flexibility⁴.

Our focus on service and convenient 
opening hours has resulted in a 
significant share of new business 
accounts being opened. In our current 
heartland of London and the South 
East we are winning 17% of SME 
business current account switchers⁵.

We are well positioned to benefit from 
regulatory changes
The pace of regulatory change 
continues to be high.

Our simple IT architecture means we are 
ready to adapt to emerging consumer 
behaviour, innovation and regulation. 
We prepared for the changes resulting 
from the Payment Services Directive 
2 (‘PSD2’) which came into effect on 
13th January 2018. This new legislation 
will help make online payments safer for 
customers, and give them more choice 
by bringing in new types of payment 
services, increasing competition 
between payment service providers 
and opening the door to new providers. 
Customers can now use authorised 
Third Party Providers (‘TPPs’) to receive 
their account information in one place. 
PSD2 opens the door for us to develop 
– or partner with others to provide 
– new services for our customers.

In November 2017, the Bank of 
England announced the end of the 
Term Funding Scheme (‘TFS’), which 
had been put in place to encourage 
banks to lend to support UK economic 
growth. During 2017, the TFS had the 
effect of increasing competition for 
quality lending opportunities, resulting 
in margin compression as lenders 
had access to low cost funding. The 
withdrawal of the scheme means 
that this cheap funding is at an end 
and banks that do not have a strong 
deposit franchise may suffer margin 
compression or lower growth. Our 
deposit-led strategy and high quality 
service has created a sustainable 
competitive advantage that will 
fuel our sustainable growth.

1.   Which (April 2017)
2.   Accenture: 10 Mega Trends driving the future of 

Cambridge

payments (2017) 

Milton Keynes

Luton 
area

Harlow

Reading

Bristol

Southend-on-sea

Bath/Swindon
corridor

Brighton and Hove

Plymouth

19

3.   ONS 2016, Data set ID: UKBAF01, Enterprise by 
Turnover size band and GB Local Authority 
Districts (including UK total), Metro Internal Data.

4.   YouGov SME banking Survey Q2 2017
5.   Charterhouse Research Business Banking Survey, 
YE Q4 2017. Based on interviews with businesses 
that had switched main bank in the 12 months 
prior to interview. Base size: 402. Data weighted by 
region and turnover to be representative of 
businesses in Great Britain.

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsBorehamwood

Watford

Edgware

Wood Green

Harrow

Uxbridge

Southall

Ealing

Chiswick

Tottenham
Court Rd.

Kensington
High Street

King’s
Road

Earl’s
Court

Hounslow

Putney

Staines

Wimbledon

Kingston

Ilford

Romford

Liverpool St.

Cheapside

Moorgate

Holborn

Piccadilly

Clapham High St.

Clapham Junction

Fulham Broadway

Bexleyheath

Bromley

Sutton

Croydon

Orpington

Wolverhampton

Merry Hill

Birmingham

Sutton
Coldfield

Solihull

Leicester

Peterborough

Cambridge

Northampton

Epsom

Milton Keynes
(Centre: MK)

Milton Keynes
(Oakgrove)

Aylesbury

Luton

Colchester

Oxford

Hemel
Hempstead

St Albans

Chelmsford

Cardiff

High Wycombe

Swindon

Bristol

Reading

Newbury

Basingstoke

Guildford

Tunbridge Wells

Ashford

Southampton

Slough

Windsor

Basildon

Southend

Maidstone

Canterbury

OPEN 7 DAYS

COMING SOON

Brighton

Eastbourne

BREAKING 
THE MOULD

Creating FANS through  
our award-winning stores

Making our bank work for you. 
From Brighton to Peterborough, Canterbury to 
Swindon, we’re part of the communities we serve. 
55 stores and counting! We’re still expanding the 
network north and west as well as infilling.

How many banks can say that?

20

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Fanatical execution is 
at the heart of our 
experience

Great retailers create fun experiences for their 
customers, turning them into FANS. We’re proud 
to be a part of the communities we serve, whether 
that’s hosting networking and community events, 
educating local schoolchildren, supporting charities 
or offering family craft activities in the holidays. Just 
because we are in the banking business, doesn’t 
mean the experience can’t be fun.

Hello Luton

DJ, stilt walkers and free goodies were 
just some of the things on offer at the 
Grand Opening when the revolution in 
British banking reached Luton on 
27 October 2017. 

Customers want choice when it comes 
to how, when and where they do their 
banking, whether that’s in store, online, 
by phone, through an app or… from the 
seat of their car! That’s why Luton is our 
third store to offer a drive-thru, following 
success in Southall and Slough. As well as 
seven days a week banking, with 6,000 
boxes, Luton offers more safe deposit 
boxes than any of our existing stores.

Hayley Harrison and the team have 
opened over 3,200 customer accounts 
across business and personal in just over 
two months. Luton had £62 million of 
deposits and £4 million of lending at 
31 December 2017.

Store  
transactions 

over 
2.7m

over 
£46m

Coins counted by 
our Magic Money 
Machines

Accounts  
opened 

over 
300k

over 
2,500

Community 
events hosted 
in stores

Pens/ 
lollipops 
given away

over 
3.5m

Visitors: dogs, rabbits, sheep, 
horses, parrots… we’ve seen it 
all. If it matters to you, it matters 
to us. No stupid bank rules!

21

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsINVESTING IN OUR 
TECHNOLOGY

Creating FANS with our  
award-winning technology

A bank built around you. 
Today, we live in a ‘now’ culture. 
Our real time technology gives our 
AMAZEING colleagues a service edge 
in store and over the phone, and puts 
customers in direct control of their 
banking online and on the move. 

22

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Open Banking? We’re ready

How customers choose to bank, and 
what we mean by banking, is evolving. 
We’re ready for that changing 
landscape. And we’re excited by it.

We’ve invested in a market leading 
Application Programming Interface 
(‘API’) layer, designed to create 
an environment that supports 
innovation and added-value 
services for our customers. Our 
API layer gives us permission to 
play in a new era of banking where 
sharing of data and third-party 
relationships will become the norm.

Metro Bank is ready to harness this 
interconnected world and is actively 
seeking innovative partnerships 
and opportunities to invest. We see 
potential to surprise and delight 
even more FANS across a number 
of themes: from enhancing our 
customer services and benefits 
to streamlining internal processes 
through partnerships with third 
parties and FinTech companies.

Our modern technology platform, 
agile ways of working, and over one 
million customer accounts gives us 
a great platform to develop next 
generation banking products and 
services. We will continue to invest 
in the platform in 2018 and beyond.

Behind the scenes, 
technology powers our 
exceptional service.

Our ability to track and adapt to customer behaviours 
helps us match our services to evolving customer needs. 
We develop innovative services that make our colleagues’ 
and customers’ lives easier and their data more secure. 
We partner with other companies who we think can bring 
something extra to the process, whether that’s some 
brilliant accounting software that our SME customers 
use or a new fraud analytics tool in the contact centre. 
Sometimes it’s the little things, such as Magic Money 
Machine deposits credited directly to accounts or adding 
new beneficiaries on the app. Sometimes it’s a game 
changer, like blocking or unblocking cards instantly from 
the app, or our new Commercial Online Banking platform. 

Flexible, scalable IT systems: Simple technology 
architecture together with fully integrated operational 
data store – all backed by real-time processing. 

Delivery: Colleagues are supported by best-in-class 
technology, so they can focus on best-in-class service. 

AMAZE 
direct calls

over 
1.5m

over 
4.3m

mobile  
transactions

online 
transactions

over
7.0m

over 
20,000

calls answered 
on bank 
holidays

fintechs 
partnered 
with

14

23

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsGROWING  
OUR TALENT

Creating FANS with our 
AMAZEING colleagues

Our people are what makes 
us different
We believe successful businesses 
attract and grow talented people. 
During 2017 we devoted over 181,000 
hours to nurturing and developing 
our biggest asset, our colleagues. 
Through our in-house training, 
mentoring, professional qualifications 
and investing in our new leaders, 
meaning our colleagues know 
we are committed to supporting 
them in their career. Which is why 
96% of our colleagues know Metro 
Bank is a good place to work. 

24

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Our colleagues  
create FANS 

Metro Bank’s secret ingredient 
is its unique culture, which is 
why we hire for attitude and 
train for skill. Our colleagues all 
take customer service to the 
next level and are focused on 
creating FANS; you can see the 
star quality in every one of them.

Building careers

Azim Mahmud’s Metro Bank story 
epitomises what is possible with 
the right attitude and a passion for 
the customer. In 2014, he applied 
for an apprentice cashier role at 
Metro Bank and has never looked 
back. In his words, “My first year 
at Metro Bank was the most vital 
learning curve as this really gave 
me an idea of what I could achieve 
if I was willing to put the work in.”

AMAZEING 
behaviours

Individual behaviours 
are measured against 
our culture, not 
sales targets, it’s 
how things get done 
that’s important 

Great 
place to 
work 

96%

We’re the only bank in 
Glassdoor Employees’ 
Choice Awards Top 50, 
and 96% of colleagues 
think that Metro Bank is 
a good place to work 

New roles 
created 

nearly
600

We have created 
nearly 600 new roles, 
promoted more than 
640 colleagues

New professional 
bankers

350

Through our Metro 
Bank University we 
have run 876 in-house 
training courses, and 
enabled 350 colleagues 
to achieve professional 
banking qualifications 

25

Fast forward 18 months and Azim was 
given the opportunity to move into 
a Customer Service Representative 
role. And in June this year he 
started the next chapter in his Metro 
Bank journey, and was promoted 
to Assistant Store Manager at our 
Romford store. And if that wasn’t 
enough for 2017, as a graduate of the 
Bank’s Learning to Lead programme, 
he collected the Progression 
Programme of the Year award at 
the Social Mobility Awards 2017. 

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

1,109

1,567

2,005

2,494

3,090

Number of colleagues

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsFINANCIAL REVIEW

ACHIEVING OUR 
FIRST ANNUAL 
PROFIT

Mike Brierley – Chief Financial Officer

We’ve delivered our  
first annual profit in line 
with the original plan, 
whilst at the same time 
maintaining record 
investment in our stores, 
our technology and  
our people

Overview
This has been an exceptional year, with the Group delivering 
continued growth in every area of the business. In my final full 
year as CFO we’ve grown our network to 55 stores, and 
expanded the revolution to new areas including 
Peterborough, Swindon and Canterbury.

The integration of our leading technology and the further 
expansion of our store footprint, is helping us realise the 
beneficial effect of our network and drive customer 
acquisition. This, in turn, has increased deposit growth, with 
deposits ending the year at £11,669 million (2016: £7,951 
million) and allowed us to increase our lending to £9,620 
million (2016: £5,865 million). Our record growth, 
supplemented by a c.£600 million mortgage portfolio 
acquisition in June, is primarily well collateralised and low risk.

The result is our first annual profit, in line with our original 
business plan. Statutory profit before tax for the year was 
£18.7 million, compared to a loss of £17.2 million in 2016. 
Underlying profit before tax, a measure which excludes the 
effect of certain one-off items which are not considered to 
reflect trends in the underlying business, was £20.8 million 
for 2017 compared to a loss of £11.7 million in 2016.

Deposits

2017 
£m

2016 
£m

Change
%

Customer deposits

11,668.7

7,950.6

Customer accounts

1,217,000

915,000

47%

33%

% current accounts

31.6%

28.7%

Average deposits per 
customer

£9,588

£8,689

10%

Deposits from customers increased by 47% over the year 
to £11,669 million (2016: £7,951 million), having surpassed 
£10 billion in the third quarter.

Growth has been driven by a combination of increased 
deposits from existing customers as well as through customer 
acquisition, including through new store openings and 
geographical expansion. The Group ended the year with 
1,217,000 customer accounts (2016: 915,000), having 
welcomed our millionth customer account on the early May 
bank holiday, a day traditionally other banks are closed.

We have continued to strengthen our diverse, low-cost 
sticky deposit base. Corporate customers make up 53% of 
total deposits. 

Cost of deposits fell to a record low of 54bp for the full year 
(2016: 79bp). Non-interest bearing liabilities, in the form of 
current accounts, have been the highest growing, up 61% 
year-on-year, and account for 32% deposits. As a conservative 
bank, we are naturally hedged and run little interest rate risk 
so these deposits should provide a funding advantage in a 
rising rate environment.

London Stock Exchange’s ‘1000 Companies 
to Inspire Britain’ 2017

26

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC   
We’ve drawn down a total of £3,321 million from the Bank of 
England’s Term Funding Scheme (‘TFS’), but remain focused 
on being a deposit-funded bank. This scheme is due to close 
in February 2018 and be fully wound down by 2022.

Assets

Loans and advances to 
customers

Total assets

Commercial lending as 
proportion of total

Loan to deposit ratio

2017 
£m

2016 
£m

Change 
%

9,620.3

5,865.4

16,355.4

10,057.3

33%

82%

36%

74%

64%

63%

–

–

Total loans and advances to customers increased by 64% to 
£9,620 million at 31 December 2017 (2016: £5,865 million). 
This was driven by continued growth within commercial 
lending, the impact of new stores and the continued 
expansion of our residential mortgage offering. In addition to 
record organic lending growth, on 2 June 2017 we completed 
the purchase of a portfolio of UK mortgages for c.£600 
million. As a result, the loan to deposit ratio has risen to 82% at 
31 December 2017 (31 December 2016: 74%).

Despite record lending growth, the cost of risk remains low at 
11bp. Overall, the credit quality of the book remains robust, 
with 91% (2016: 88%) of lending secured by collateral. 
Consumer lending continues to remain a small part of our 
business, at 2% of gross lending, as we focus on well 
collateralised low-risk commercial and residential lending. 

Metro Bank’s other income consists primarily of fees and 
commissions totalling £29.7 million (2016: £22.2 million), 
earned through our range of commercial and retail services. 
Of this, £9.1 million was attributable to the rental of safe 
deposit boxes, an increase of 30% compared to 2016 
(£13.3 million).

Operating expenses

Operating expenses

Cost:income ratio

2017 
£m

266.9

91%

2016 
£m

207.6

106%

Change 
%

29%

–

Further details on operating costs are included in note 5 to 
the financial statements.

Total operating costs increased by 29% to £266.9 million 
(2016: £207.6 million), as we continued to invest in our 
colleagues and stores.

The cost:income ratio improved to 91% (2016: 106%), 
reflecting our transition into profitability. This improvement 
has come through growth rather than cost-cutting. It 
demonstrates our philosophy that sustainable profit growth is 
the result of great customer service and fanatical execution, 
driven through continued investment in colleagues and both 
physical and digital infrastructure.

Annual operating costs per £1 million of deposits is down 
from £25,000 in 2016 to £23,000 in 2017, an improvement of 
11% and a reflection of our strengthening economies of scale.

Income

Net interest income

Other income

Total income

Net interest margin

2017 
£m

241.0

52.8

293.8

1.93%

Customer net interest margin

2.19%

2016 
£m

Change 
%

154.2

40.9

195.1

1.97%

2.13%

56%

29%

51%

(4)bps

+6bps

People costs continue to be the largest component of 
operating expenses and have risen 31% year-on-year due to 
new store growth and the further expansion of our specialist 
support functions. Occupancy costs increased 19% to £30.9 
million, as a result of the store openings, as well as taking 
possession of new office space and stores currently under 
development. The growth in occupancy expenses has been 
partially limited by the acquisition of the freeholds of some of 
our stores. These are purchased when the opportunity arises 
and where there’s a strong commercial basis for doing so.

Further details on net interest income and other income are 
included on page 96.

Total income increased by £98.7 million to a record £293.8 
million (2016: £195.1 million), reflecting strong growth across 
all of our lending books, increased fee income and a record 
low cost of deposits.

Customer net interest margin rose by 6bps due to an increase 
in the loan to deposit ratio, as well as non-interest bearing 
accounts becoming a greater component of deposits. During 
the year, we started reporting customer net interest margin 
for the first time. This strips out the effect of the Bank of 
England Term Funding and Funding for Lending schemes. 
Although accretive to income, participation in these schemes 
has a dilutive effect on the margin. Customer net interest 
margin is therefore more representative of our underlying 
performance and also provides an indication of future 
performance once these schemes are wound down. A 
reconciliation of customer net interest margin can be found 
on page 134.

27

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsFINANCIAL REVIEW CONTINUED

Depreciation and amortisation increased by 49% year-on-
year reflecting the increased investment in stores and 
technology.

Taxation
The income tax charge for the year was £7.9 million (2016: 
£0.4 million tax credit), with an effective tax rate of 42.2% 
(2016: 2.6%). The effective tax rate is higher than the statutory 
income tax rate (19.25%) primarily due to legislation enacted 
in 2017 and effective from 1 April 2017 which restricts the 
amount of profit that may be offset by brought-forward 
losses to 50%. This delays our loss utilisation profile to years in 
which lower tax rates will apply and the value of the deferred 
tax asset has been reassessed accordingly. The deferred tax 
asset decreased from £56.3 million at 31 December 2016 to 
£53.7 million at 31 December 2017 primarily due to the 
utilisation of brought-forward tax losses against taxable profits 
during the year. Without the effect of changes in tax rates our 
effective tax rate for the year would be 26.3% (2016: 1.0%).

Store contribution increases for new and existing stores

£62.0m
55 stores

£56.7m
50 stores

£36.9m
48 stores

£40.0m
48 stores

£47.5m
48 stores

Stores
We increased the proportion of freehold ownership of stores 
to 20% during the year (31 December 2016: 13%), as we took 
ownership of three of newly opened stores as well as two 
stores previously leased. The purchase of these five stores 
during the year will result in annualised rental savings of over 
£1.3 million.

As well as having a strong financial rationale, the expansion of 
freehold purchases underlines our commitment to remaining 
in the communities we serve. This is in stark contrast to the 
big five banks which have shrunk their networks over the past 
year as they continue to retreat from the high street.

The continued expansion during 2017 has once again led to 
an increased contribution from both new and existing stores. 
At the end of 2017, 49 of our 55 stores were making positive 
contributions, including all stores that have been open more 
than 18 months.

Safe deposit boxes, an area we believe to have been 
previously under served by the market, remain a key part of 
our business model. Income from safe deposit boxes covers 
80% of net rent on our stores.

Capital structure

2017 
£m

2016  
£m

Change  

%

£38.5m
40 stores

£41.8m
42 stores

£48.7m
42 stores

£57.4m
44 stores

£63.3m
49 stores

Common Equity Tier 1  
(‘CET1’) Capital

896.9

651.4

Risk weighted assets (‘RWAs’)

5,881.8

3,590.4

37.7%

56.7%

-£1.6m
8 stores

-£1.8m
6 stores

-£1.2m
6 stores

-£0.7m
6 stores

-£1.3m
6 stores

Regulatory leverage ratio

Q4 2016 Q1 2017 Q2 2017 Q3 2017 Q4 2017

Negative contribution

Positive contribution

Leverage

CET1 ratio

15.3%

18.1%

230bps

5.5%

6.7%

6.5% (110)bps

8.0% (130)bps

Case study – Ealing

Example store P&L: Ealing

Our Ealing store opened on 7 June 2013 and within 14 
months was making a positive contribution. In its fourth 
year (to 6 June 2017), deposits grew by £5.3 million/
month. At the same time, now the store is fully 
established direct costs remain largely static – ensuring 
an increasing contribution to the Group’s profitability.

92% of the store’s safe deposit boxes are currently 
occupied and cover all of the store’s rental costs.

Y1
£’000

Y2
£’000

Y3
£’000

Y4
£’000

Deposits

44,581

153,232

226,255

290,347

Number of customer 
accounts

10,399

17,603

24,949

31,870

Total income

Income growth

812

2,903

4,498

6,931

–

+258%

+55%

+54%

  People costs

  Property costs

  Other costs

Total store operating 
expenses

647

837

162

669

776

126

699

795

111

702

841

195

1,646

1,571

1,605

1,738

Cost growth

–

(4)%

+2%

+8%

Store contribution

(834)

1,332

2,893

5,193

28

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Capital is held to protect depositors, cover inherent risks and 
provide a cushion in the event of a stress event. We’re 
committed to maintaining a strong capital base under both 
existing and future regulatory requirements. In July 2017, the 
Group successfully completed a £278 million capital raise 
from existing and new shareholders via an accelerated book 
build. The raise was significantly oversubscribed, with shares 
issued at full market value, demonstrating the continued 
confidence that investors have in our vision. The capital raise 
incurred associated expenses of £3 million which were offset 
against share premium.

CET1 ratio bridge

18.1%

(5.5%)

(1.5%)

(0.7%)

0.2%

4.7%

15.3%

Dec 
2016

Lending 
growth

Portfolio 
acquisition

Intangible

Profit

Equity 
issuance

Dec 2017

IFRS 9 was implemented on 1 January 2018. The transitional 
disclosures can be found in note 30 to the financial 
statements on page 127. As at 31 December 2017, the opening 
balance sheet adjustment, to be recognised in 2018, is to 
increase credit impairment provisions by £22.7 million before 
tax. Separately, there is an increase in asset values of £6.8 
million due to changes arising from the revised classification 
and measurement requirements. After deferred tax 
adjustments of £3.8 million, this results in a net decrease in 
equity of £12.1 million. We have elected to adopt the 
transitional arrangements issued by the European Banking 
Authority, enabling us to reduce the capital impact of the 
transition in the first five years following adoption. The initial 
impact of IFRS 9 on our regulatory capital base will be 
immaterial.

As our balance sheet growth continues, we will need to raise 
additional qualifying regulatory capital. Based on our current 
growth expectations and expected regulatory requirements, 
we have sufficient capital for 2018. We do need to raise 

capital in early 2019 but, as a conservative bank, our approach 
will be to raise capital ahead of need. With a current capital 
base consisting of equity only, we expect our next capital 
raise to be in the form of loss absorbing debt. Our intention 
is to maintain a minimum CET 1 ratio of 12 and a minimum 
regulatory leverage ratio of 4%.

The transition arrangements for MREL, the new framework 
outlined by the Bank of England to determine the minimum 
amount of loss absorbing resources will apply from 1 January 
2020. We expect to fully meet the MREL requirements at that 
point and estimate we will need to raise c£750m of MREL 
qualifying debt by then. We currently expect to start to raise 
MREL debt in 2019.

Looking ahead
Our seventh year has been truly exceptional. We’ve delivered 
our first annual profit, celebrated our millionth customer and 
topped £11 billion in customer deposits. These achievements 
are testament to our low-risk operating model, our unique 
culture and our unrivalled focus on creating FANS.

Next year we’ll continue to execute our strategy. This will 
include expanding our footprint further west to Bristol and 
Cardiff and north to the Midlands. In addition, we’ll bolster our 
presence in the south-east, starting with the opening of our 
new Watford store in the second quarter. Combined with 
online growth, this will maintain our momentum of attracting 
low cost deposits combined with low risk lending.

We expect to see a sustained positive trajectory in our 
profitability, achieved through a combination of continued 
balance sheet growth and cost control. I am proud that we 
have unveiled our 2023 targets, the next milestone in our 
growth. We expect to see a sustained positive trajectory in our 
profitability, achieved through a combination of continued 
balance sheet growth and cost control. At the same time, 
we remain committed to maintaining our investment in our 
colleagues, our technology and our stores, which are the 
backbone of our business and key to delivering our targets in 
2020, 2023 and beyond

Mike Brierley
Chief Financial Officer
1 March 2018

29

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsRISK FACTORS AND MANAGEMENT

GROWING METRO BANK, 
SAFELY AND SUSTAINABLY

We aim to manage the risks inherent in our business 
activities, ensuring that our operations are carried out in a 
safe and compliant way, balanced with the strong customer 
service that enables us to create FANS.

Aileen Gillan – Chief Risk Officer

Risk strategy
We adopt best practice in corporate 
governance, risk management 
and control appropriate to the size 
and complexity of our business. All 
our colleagues are responsible for 
managing risk as part of their day-to-
day role. Customer-facing colleagues 
are at the forefront of risk management, 
along with their line managers. The Risk 
function, including the underwriting, 
credit risk and analytics, treasury risk, 
and enterprise risk teams, oversees 
the risk management activities. The 
function also supports other colleagues 
in their risk management work, for 
example by providing centralised 
‘bump-up’ support contacts for 
more complex requirements, freeing 
up customer-facing colleagues 
to focus on creating FANS.

Given the nature of our activities,  
the principal risks and uncertainties  
we face are:

Strategic risk

Market risk, 
including 
interest rate 
risk

Conduct risk

Operational 
risk

Credit risk

Liquidity risk

Compliance 
and regulatory 
risk

£

Financial crime

The Board has ultimate responsibility 
for setting the Bank’s strategy, 
corporate objectives and risk appetite. 
The strategy and risk appetite 
consider the interests of customers, 
shareholders and other stakeholders. 
Taking into consideration the advice 
of the Risk Oversight Committee, 
the Board specifically approves the 
level of risk acceptable under each 
category of risk, and ensures there is 
an adequate framework in place for 
reporting and managing those risks. 

It is also responsible for maintaining 
an appropriate control environment 
to manage the principal risks and for 
ensuring the capital, liquidity, and other 
resources are adequate to achieve our 
objectives within our risk appetite.

The Risk function provides specialist 
knowledge and support to colleagues 
throughout the Bank and acts as a 
reference point for queries, while also 
overseeing colleagues and the risks and 
controls in place. The function operates 
themed, targeted and ad-hoc reviews 
to provide assurance to the leadership 
team – and ultimately to the Board 
– that risks are properly managed, 
controls are effective, and that we’re 
not exceeding our risk appetite.

The Board has delegated responsibility 
for reviewing the effectiveness of the 
Bank’s internal controls to the Audit 
Committee. This Committee monitors 
and considers the internal control 
environment, focusing on operational 
risks, internal and external audits and 
credit assurance, and is assisted in its 
oversight role by our Internal Audit 
function. Internal Audit carries out 
both regular and ad-hoc reviews of risk 
management controls and procedures, 
and reports the results to the Audit 
Committee. The Director of Internal 
Audit’s reporting line is to the Chairman 
of the Audit Committee – with a 
dotted line to the CEO – and therefore 
supports the function’s independence.

The Risk Oversight Committee 
helps the Board provide leadership, 
direction and oversight of our risk 
governance and management. It also 
helps the Board foster a culture that 
emphasises and demonstrates the 
benefits of a risk-based approach 
to risk management and internal 
control when creating FANS.

30

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  We’ve established our risk management 
policies to identify and analyse the risks 
faced by the Bank, to set appropriate 
risk limits and controls, and to monitor 
risks and adherence to limits. The Risk 
team regularly reviews these policies 
and controls to verify compliance and 
to reflect changes in market conditions 
and the Bank’s activities. We use 
training and management standards 
and procedures to develop a robust 
and effective control environment – 
one where all colleagues understand 
their roles and obligations.

Our Chief Risk Officer (‘CRO’) 
leads the Risk function, which 
is independent from the Bank’s 
operational and commercial functions. 
She is responsible for ensuring 
that appropriate risk management 
processes, policies and controls are 
in place, and that they’re sufficiently 
robust – ensuring that key risks are 
identified, assessed, monitored and 
mitigated. The CRO is also responsible 
for providing assurance to the Board 
and Directors that the principal risks 
are appropriately managed and that 
we are operating within our risk 
appetite. She is the Bank’s designated 
Money Laundering Reporting Officer 
(‘MLRO’). The CRO has access, and a 
dotted reporting line, to the Chairman 
of the Risk Oversight Committee.

Our model has three lines of defence 
for risk management:
•  Operational management, the 

colleagues who lead and manage our 
front line from day to day

•  Governance and oversight, which is 
provided by the Risk function and 
includes all significant risk categories, 
such as credit risk, compliance and 
conduct risk, operational risk, market 
risk, interest rate risk and liquidity risk

•  Internal Audit, which provides 

independent assurance through 
reviews and reports the results to the 
Audit Committee

Committee structure and risk responsibilities

Board of Directors

Audit 
Committee

AC

Risk Oversight 
Committee

ROC

Nomination

Committee

NomCo

Remuneration 
Committee

RemCo

Chief Executive Officer (CEO) 

Executive Committee (ExCo)

Asset and Liability 
Committee

ALCO

Enterprise Risk 
Committee

ERC

Credit Risk Policy  
and Appetite 
Committee

CRPAC

Provisions 
Committee

Credit Approval 
Committee

Model Governance 
Committee

ProvCo

CAC

MGC

This graphic illustrates the key committees of the Bank with risk responsibility – to 
keep it simple, not all are shown.

Three lines of defence model

Board of Directors

Board establishes risk appetite and risk strategy

Approves frameworks, methodologies, policies and responsibilities

1

Operational 
management

2

Risk  
management

3

Internal Audit

first line of defence

second line of defence

third line of defence

•  Line management in each 

•  Independent risk 

business area

•  Primary responsibility for 
systems, controls and risk 
management
•  Creates FANS

management function
•  Provides specialist advice, 
governance and oversight
•  Supports and challenges the 

first line

•  Internal Audit function
•  Independent assurance and 

reporting line

31

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsRISK FACTORS AND MANAGEMENT CONTINUED

Effective risk management lies at the heart of how we work. The table below shows our  
strategic, credit, market, liquidity, conduct, compliance and regulatory, operational and  
financial crime risks and explains how we manage them.

Risk factor

1 Strategic risk

Strategic risk is the risk that we do not achieve short and long-term 
business objectives because we fail to either: maintain our unique 
culture; maintain our differentiated model which delivers unparalleled 
levels of service and convenience; or develop the products, capabilities 
and competitive position necessary to attract new customers, compete 
effectively and withstand market volatility. Such failures could mean 
we don’t create FANS or deliver outcomes expected by stakeholders 
(customers, colleagues, shareholders, investors, communities 
and regulators).

2 Credit risk

Credit risk is the risk of financial loss due to a customer’s failure to meet 
the terms of any contract or failure to perform as agreed. Our detailed 
lending policies ensure credit risk-taking is based on sound credit risk 
principles, including sector and concentration limits. Credit risk is 
overseen by the CRO, Credit Sanctioning Committee, Credit Policy 
and Appetite Committee and the Risk Oversight Committee.

Change in year

Management

As we grow, it remains important to maintain our unique 
culture while continuing to deliver the outcomes our 
stakeholders expect. We also need to continually adapt 
to developments in technology, the markets, the law and 
competition, and to respond to changes in the banking 
sector which affect the way we do business.

Our fundamental approach to credit risk management 
remains unchanged. Our underwriting teams have 
grown in size and scope as the Bank has grown, and our 
risk measurement has been enhanced by the work on 
the AIRB models.

As the portfolio matures, the proportion of loans subject 
to enhanced oversight owing to deterioration in the 
borrower’s credit quality has increased, albeit to a very 
modest degree. Our Business and Credit Support team, 
which is part of the Credit Underwriting function, 
manages these exposures closely and has a strong track 
record of obtaining recovery.

3 Market risk

Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as interest rates 
or prices of investment securities, will affect our income or the value of 
our holdings of financial instruments. The objective of our market risk 
management strategy is to manage and control market risk exposures 
within acceptable parameters to ensure the Bank’s solvency while 
optimising the return on risk.

We remain focused on managing market risk within our 
defined limits. The Treasury and Treasury Risk functions 
work closely together and ensure that risks are managed 
appropriately – and that we’re well positioned to avoid 
losses outside our appetite, in the event of unexpected 
market moves.

4 Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that we will encounter difficulty in meeting 
obligations associated with our financial liabilities that are settled by 
delivering cash or another financial asset, or will incur a disproportionate 
cost in meeting these obligations.

Our liquidity position has remained stable over the year 
with our Liquidity Coverage Ratio (‘LCR’) remaining 
strong at 141% (2016: 136%) and we hold excess liquidity 
over our requirements. Funding risks are well-managed; 
a number of factors, including the Bank of England’s 
Term Funding Scheme, have resulted in an easing of 
liquidity conditions compared to 2016.

We manage this risk by frequently considering a broad range of management information and key performance and risk indicators at Business Risk 

Committees, the Executive Leadership Team and the Board. We also carry out regular reviews of performance against the business plan – also at the 

Executive Leadership Team – and these provide early warnings of where planned delivery maybe at risk. Additionally, we look externally, both within 

financial services and across other industries, for innovations and market developments with which we can improve the Bank.

The CRO is responsible for managing our credit risk by:

•  Defining the Enterprise Risk Management structure and quantifying the Bank’s risk appetite

compliance with regulatory and statutory requirements

•  Establishing the authorisation structure for the approval and renewal of credit facilities

•  Formulating credit policies covering collateral requirements, credit assessment, risk grading and reporting, documentary and legal procedures and 

•  Limiting concentrations of exposure to counterparties and industries (for loans and advances and similar exposures) and by issuer, credit rating and 

market liquidity (for investment securities)

We aim for a well-balanced loan portfolio, through the economic cycle, weighing risk and reward appropriately in lending decisions. Our detailed 

lending policies ensure that we base credit risk-taking on sound credit risk principles. We set limits for each borrower, together with large exposure 

limits consistent with prudential regulatory rules. We also measure concentration risk, loan arrears and bad debts. For quantification of credit risk, we 

currently use the Standardised approach assessed under Basel II, Pillars 1 and 2. The first round of our AIRB application has been submitted – and we 

continue to work on modelling with a view to further extending our use of this approach. 

Additional information about our credit risk exposures can be found in note 22 to the financial statements on page 115

Day-to-day management of market risk is the responsibility of the Treasury team, with oversight from Treasury Risk.

We aim to minimise earnings shocks or surprises. We don’t undertake proprietary trading activities and only hold high-rated investment securities. 

Our management team regularly monitors exposures to price risk and movements in investment value through the Asset and Liability Management 

Committee (‘ALCO’) and regular Treasury reporting.

We do not sell derivatives or other complex products to customers.

We are mindful of upcoming regulatory changes, such as ring-fencing, as we shape the investment portfolio in 2018 and beyond. 

Additional details of our market risk management are included in note 24 to the financial statements on page 121

We aim to hold a prudent level of liquidity to cover unexpected outflows, ensuring that we are able to meet financial commitments for an extended 

period. We recognise the potential difficulties in monetising certain assets, so set higher-quality targets for liquid assets for the initial part of a stress 

period. We have assessed the level of liquidity necessary to cover both systemic and idiosyncratic risks and maintain an appropriate liquidity buffer at all 

times. Our LCR ensures that we comply with our own risk appetite as well as regulatory requirements. In addition to cash and balances at the Bank of 

England, we hold a range of marketable assets, including covered bonds and government debt, which are highly liquid assets. We also maintain a 

balance sheet structure that limits our reliance on potentially volatile sources of funding.

The Board sets our risk appetite and policy for managing liquidity risk, and delegates responsibility for oversight of this policy and its implementation to 

the Asset and Liability Committee (‘ALCO’). The Treasury team manages our liquidity position on a day-to-day basis under the oversight of the Chief 

Financial Officer and ALCO. The Treasury Risk team circulates detailed daily management information to the Treasury team and relevant members of 

the Executive Leadership Team, regarding the outcome of our combined stress-test scenario. This is summarised to ALCO, ROC and the Board at each 

of their meetings. Our approach is to ensure that we can both meet payments as they fall due and support asset growth in line with plan – in both 

normal conditions and in the event of a liquidity stress – and that we can survive a severe liquidity stress event and continue as a going concern. 

Additional information on our liquidity position at year-end is available in note 23 to the financial statements on page 119

32

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Risk factor

1 Strategic risk

and regulators).

2 Credit risk

Strategic risk is the risk that we do not achieve short and long-term 

business objectives because we fail to either: maintain our unique 

culture; maintain our differentiated model which delivers unparalleled 

levels of service and convenience; or develop the products, capabilities 

and competitive position necessary to attract new customers, compete 

effectively and withstand market volatility. Such failures could mean 

we don’t create FANS or deliver outcomes expected by stakeholders 

(customers, colleagues, shareholders, investors, communities 

lending policies ensure credit risk-taking is based on sound credit risk 

principles, including sector and concentration limits. Credit risk is 

overseen by the CRO, Credit Sanctioning Committee, Credit Policy 

and Appetite Committee and the Risk Oversight Committee.

Credit risk is the risk of financial loss due to a customer’s failure to meet 

Our fundamental approach to credit risk management 

the terms of any contract or failure to perform as agreed. Our detailed 

remains unchanged. Our underwriting teams have 

As we grow, it remains important to maintain our unique 

culture while continuing to deliver the outcomes our 

stakeholders expect. We also need to continually adapt 

to developments in technology, the markets, the law and 

competition, and to respond to changes in the banking 

sector which affect the way we do business.

grown in size and scope as the Bank has grown, and our 

risk measurement has been enhanced by the work on 

the AIRB models.

As the portfolio matures, the proportion of loans subject 

to enhanced oversight owing to deterioration in the 

borrower’s credit quality has increased, albeit to a very 

modest degree. Our Business and Credit Support team, 

which is part of the Credit Underwriting function, 

manages these exposures closely and has a strong track 

record of obtaining recovery.

3 Market risk

Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as interest rates 

or prices of investment securities, will affect our income or the value of 

our holdings of financial instruments. The objective of our market risk 

management strategy is to manage and control market risk exposures 

within acceptable parameters to ensure the Bank’s solvency while 

optimising the return on risk.

We remain focused on managing market risk within our 

defined limits. The Treasury and Treasury Risk functions 

work closely together and ensure that risks are managed 

appropriately – and that we’re well positioned to avoid 

losses outside our appetite, in the event of unexpected 

market moves.

4 Liquidity risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that we will encounter difficulty in meeting 

obligations associated with our financial liabilities that are settled by 

delivering cash or another financial asset, or will incur a disproportionate 

cost in meeting these obligations.

Our liquidity position has remained stable over the year 

with our Liquidity Coverage Ratio (‘LCR’) remaining 

strong at 141% (2016: 136%) and we hold excess liquidity 

over our requirements. Funding risks are well-managed; 

a number of factors, including the Bank of England’s 

Term Funding Scheme, have resulted in an easing of 

liquidity conditions compared to 2016.

Effective risk management lies at the heart of how we work. The table below shows our  

strategic, credit, market, liquidity, conduct, compliance and regulatory, operational and  

financial crime risks and explains how we manage them.

Change in year

Management

  No change

  Risk increased

  Risk decreased

We manage this risk by frequently considering a broad range of management information and key performance and risk indicators at Business Risk 
Committees, the Executive Leadership Team and the Board. We also carry out regular reviews of performance against the business plan – also at the 
Executive Leadership Team – and these provide early warnings of where planned delivery maybe at risk. Additionally, we look externally, both within 
financial services and across other industries, for innovations and market developments with which we can improve the Bank.

The CRO is responsible for managing our credit risk by:
•  Defining the Enterprise Risk Management structure and quantifying the Bank’s risk appetite
•  Formulating credit policies covering collateral requirements, credit assessment, risk grading and reporting, documentary and legal procedures and 

compliance with regulatory and statutory requirements

•  Establishing the authorisation structure for the approval and renewal of credit facilities
•  Limiting concentrations of exposure to counterparties and industries (for loans and advances and similar exposures) and by issuer, credit rating and 

market liquidity (for investment securities)

We aim for a well-balanced loan portfolio, through the economic cycle, weighing risk and reward appropriately in lending decisions. Our detailed 
lending policies ensure that we base credit risk-taking on sound credit risk principles. We set limits for each borrower, together with large exposure 
limits consistent with prudential regulatory rules. We also measure concentration risk, loan arrears and bad debts. For quantification of credit risk, we 
currently use the Standardised approach assessed under Basel II, Pillars 1 and 2. The first round of our AIRB application has been submitted – and we 
continue to work on modelling with a view to further extending our use of this approach. 

Additional information about our credit risk exposures can be found in note 22 to the financial statements on page 115

Day-to-day management of market risk is the responsibility of the Treasury team, with oversight from Treasury Risk.

We aim to minimise earnings shocks or surprises. We don’t undertake proprietary trading activities and only hold high-rated investment securities. 
Our management team regularly monitors exposures to price risk and movements in investment value through the Asset and Liability Management 
Committee (‘ALCO’) and regular Treasury reporting.

We do not sell derivatives or other complex products to customers.

We are mindful of upcoming regulatory changes, such as ring-fencing, as we shape the investment portfolio in 2018 and beyond. 

Additional details of our market risk management are included in note 24 to the financial statements on page 121

We aim to hold a prudent level of liquidity to cover unexpected outflows, ensuring that we are able to meet financial commitments for an extended 
period. We recognise the potential difficulties in monetising certain assets, so set higher-quality targets for liquid assets for the initial part of a stress 
period. We have assessed the level of liquidity necessary to cover both systemic and idiosyncratic risks and maintain an appropriate liquidity buffer at all 
times. Our LCR ensures that we comply with our own risk appetite as well as regulatory requirements. In addition to cash and balances at the Bank of 
England, we hold a range of marketable assets, including covered bonds and government debt, which are highly liquid assets. We also maintain a 
balance sheet structure that limits our reliance on potentially volatile sources of funding.

The Board sets our risk appetite and policy for managing liquidity risk, and delegates responsibility for oversight of this policy and its implementation to 
the Asset and Liability Committee (‘ALCO’). The Treasury team manages our liquidity position on a day-to-day basis under the oversight of the Chief 
Financial Officer and ALCO. The Treasury Risk team circulates detailed daily management information to the Treasury team and relevant members of 
the Executive Leadership Team, regarding the outcome of our combined stress-test scenario. This is summarised to ALCO, ROC and the Board at each 
of their meetings. Our approach is to ensure that we can both meet payments as they fall due and support asset growth in line with plan – in both 
normal conditions and in the event of a liquidity stress – and that we can survive a severe liquidity stress event and continue as a going concern. 

Additional information on our liquidity position at year-end is available in note 23 to the financial statements on page 119

33

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsRISK FACTORS AND MANAGEMENT CONTINUED

Change in year

Management

Our simple, transparent product range and activities 
continue to ensure that customer outcomes are fair. 
Ongoing work ensures that our communications are 
clear, fair and not misleading, and that sales incentives  
in stores neither exist nor are perceived by colleagues  
to exist.

The range and complexity of regulations with which we 
are required to comply has increased. During 2017, work 
was ongoing on a number of projects relating to 
regulatory changes. These included the 4th Money 
Laundering Directive (‘4MLD’), the General Data 
Protection Regulation (‘GDPR’), and the second Payment 
Services Directive (‘PSD2’). Regulatory appetite for 
non-compliance is negligible and sanctions for 
violations are increasing.

Operational risk is a key focus area. We remain vigilant 
regarding fraudulent actions, and have a range of 
system, process and people improvements in place to 
minimise the impact on the Bank and our customers.

In common with the industry at large, we continue to 
see increases in both the quantity and sophistication of 
cyber-crime attempts. We expanded and upskilled our 
Information Security team during 2017. In conjunction 
with other firms, we share threat intelligence through 
industry forums and work closely with law enforcement 
to pre-emptively reduce the cyber security risks to which 
we are exposed.

Financial crime risk, which we assess as a key risk, 
remained stable during 2017. We have grown our 
second-line AML team substantially, and also enhanced 
our assurance and oversight activity. Further ongoing 
enhancements to our systems and processes – such as 
machine learning and additional screening rules – will 
enable us to remain on top of the constantly evolving 
challenges in the area of financial crime.

We have a range of controls in place to mitigate this risk – and our service-led business model and absence of legacy issues give us inherent 

advantages. We don’t offer sales-based incentives to store colleagues. The simplicity of our product range, together with our culture of delivering 

unparalleled levels of service and convenience to customers, help ensure that we consistently deliver fair customer outcomes. This has resulted in a 

low level of reportable complaints, below the industry average. We constantly analyse the root cause of complaints, as well as any underlying trends, 

to identify opportunities to improve service provision while delivering consistently fair outcomes for customers.

The Board is focused on responding effectively and in a timely manner to changes in the regulatory environment to ensure continued compliance with 

regulatory requirements – and we allocate appropriate resource to achieve this.

We aim to maintain robust operational systems and controls and use rigorous planning and testing to make sure that we can respond to unexpected 

events in an organised and timely manner. Each business line undertakes an assessment of key risks and risk exposures. Each risk exposure is assessed 

to determine the appropriate controls. In addition, the three lines of defence model is used: firstly, business owners own and manage risks and 

controls; the second line sets standards and defines tools to be used to manage risk; and the third line provides independent assurance over the other 

two lines of defence.

to specific events.

The implementation of this approach requires the first line of defence to maintain a risk and control self-assessment for each business area. This 

records that area’s risks rated by impact and likelihood, before and after taking into account any mitigating controls. These controls are maintained 

in a library linking each risk to its appropriate controls. The second line has responsibility for carrying out control testing and themed reviews.

We have continued to invest time and resources into improving operational resilience both in the context of day-to-day operations and responding 

We are required to have effective procedures, systems and controls in place to detect and prevent financial crime. We are committed to complying 

with our legal and regulatory responsibilities in relation to financial crime, and have no appetite for non-compliance.

In order to support our growth plans, we’re dedicated to maintaining a robust control environment. This enables us to respond effectively to emerging 

financial crime threats, which are becoming more frequent, more varied and more innovative. The need to protect the Bank, our customers, assets and 

society from the impact of financial crime has never been more challenging. We constantly review our internal systems and processes to ensure they 

provide adequate protection against new and emerging threats. We hold induction and training programmes for colleagues – covering all aspects of 

financial crime – and these help us to protect customers and assets.

Our robust framework assesses and monitors risks in relation to customers, relationships, transactions and payments. The aim is to ensure that there 

are tailored, risk-based systems and controls in place to manage potential risks, and avoid losses, reputational impacts or degradation of customer 

experience.

Oversight and monitoring of our systems and controls is through the three lines of defence: (i) our risk and control self-assessment; (ii) dedicated, 

specialist colleagues operating the systems and controls in the first line of defence, overseen by the second line Anti-Money Laundering (‘AML’) Risk 

team; and (iii) Internal Audit. In addition, key risk indicators are in place with regular reports through the appropriate Bank Committees and the Board.

We have made significant investment to enhance systems, controls and people to support the execution of our business strategy, and to ensure that 

we have robust and sustainable models as we grow. This includes continuously enhancing our transaction monitoring and surveillance system for 

anti-money laundering, counter terrorist financing and sanctions.

Risk factor

5 Conduct risk

Conduct risk is the risk that our operating model, culture or actions result 
in unfair outcomes for customers. Our priority is to effectively manage 
risks that may impact our customers. We manage conduct risk 
consistently with our overall risk appetite and aligned with our strategy of 
creating fans. Conduct risk may arise from any aspect of the way we 
conduct our business – our aim is to avoid conduct that may result in 
unfair outcomes for customers.

6 Compliance and regulatory risk

Compliance and regulatory risk is the risk of financial loss or reputational 
damage due to regulatory sanctions. These include fines or penalties, 
restriction or suspension of business, or the cost of mandatory corrective 
action as a result of failing to adhere to applicable laws, regulations and 
supervisory guidance

7 Operational risk

Operational risk is the risk of direct or indirect impact from failed or 
inadequate processes, people or systems, or exposure to external events. 
This impact could be financial or non-financial in nature. Non-financial 
impact includes customer detriment, regulatory action or reputational 
consequences.

8 Financial crime

Financial crime is the risk of financial loss or reputational damage. This 
could be due to regulatory fines or penalties, restriction or suspension of 
business or cost of mandatory corrective action as a result of failing to 
comply with prevailing legal and regulatory requirements relating to 
financial crime. Such crime includes internal or external fraud, money 
laundering, terrorist financing, bribery and corruption and sanctions 
non-compliance.

34

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Risk factor

5 Conduct risk

Conduct risk is the risk that our operating model, culture or actions result 

in unfair outcomes for customers. Our priority is to effectively manage 

risks that may impact our customers. We manage conduct risk 

consistently with our overall risk appetite and aligned with our strategy of 

creating fans. Conduct risk may arise from any aspect of the way we 

Our simple, transparent product range and activities 

continue to ensure that customer outcomes are fair. 

Ongoing work ensures that our communications are 

clear, fair and not misleading, and that sales incentives  

in stores neither exist nor are perceived by colleagues  

conduct our business – our aim is to avoid conduct that may result in 

to exist.

unfair outcomes for customers.

6 Compliance and regulatory risk

Compliance and regulatory risk is the risk of financial loss or reputational 

damage due to regulatory sanctions. These include fines or penalties, 

The range and complexity of regulations with which we 

are required to comply has increased. During 2017, work 

restriction or suspension of business, or the cost of mandatory corrective 

was ongoing on a number of projects relating to 

action as a result of failing to adhere to applicable laws, regulations and 

supervisory guidance

regulatory changes. These included the 4th Money 

Laundering Directive (‘4MLD’), the General Data 

Protection Regulation (‘GDPR’), and the second Payment 

Services Directive (‘PSD2’). Regulatory appetite for 

non-compliance is negligible and sanctions for 

violations are increasing.

7 Operational risk

consequences.

Operational risk is the risk of direct or indirect impact from failed or 

Operational risk is a key focus area. We remain vigilant 

inadequate processes, people or systems, or exposure to external events. 

regarding fraudulent actions, and have a range of 

This impact could be financial or non-financial in nature. Non-financial 

impact includes customer detriment, regulatory action or reputational 

system, process and people improvements in place to 

minimise the impact on the Bank and our customers.

8 Financial crime

Financial crime is the risk of financial loss or reputational damage. This 

could be due to regulatory fines or penalties, restriction or suspension of 

business or cost of mandatory corrective action as a result of failing to 

comply with prevailing legal and regulatory requirements relating to 

financial crime. Such crime includes internal or external fraud, money 

laundering, terrorist financing, bribery and corruption and sanctions 

non-compliance.

In common with the industry at large, we continue to 

see increases in both the quantity and sophistication of 

cyber-crime attempts. We expanded and upskilled our 

Information Security team during 2017. In conjunction 

with other firms, we share threat intelligence through 

industry forums and work closely with law enforcement 

to pre-emptively reduce the cyber security risks to which 

we are exposed.

Financial crime risk, which we assess as a key risk, 

remained stable during 2017. We have grown our 

second-line AML team substantially, and also enhanced 

our assurance and oversight activity. Further ongoing 

enhancements to our systems and processes – such as 

machine learning and additional screening rules – will 

enable us to remain on top of the constantly evolving 

challenges in the area of financial crime.

Change in year

Management

  No change

  Risk increased

  Risk decreased

We have a range of controls in place to mitigate this risk – and our service-led business model and absence of legacy issues give us inherent 
advantages. We don’t offer sales-based incentives to store colleagues. The simplicity of our product range, together with our culture of delivering 
unparalleled levels of service and convenience to customers, help ensure that we consistently deliver fair customer outcomes. This has resulted in a 
low level of reportable complaints, below the industry average. We constantly analyse the root cause of complaints, as well as any underlying trends, 
to identify opportunities to improve service provision while delivering consistently fair outcomes for customers.

The Board is focused on responding effectively and in a timely manner to changes in the regulatory environment to ensure continued compliance with 
regulatory requirements – and we allocate appropriate resource to achieve this.

We aim to maintain robust operational systems and controls and use rigorous planning and testing to make sure that we can respond to unexpected 
events in an organised and timely manner. Each business line undertakes an assessment of key risks and risk exposures. Each risk exposure is assessed 
to determine the appropriate controls. In addition, the three lines of defence model is used: firstly, business owners own and manage risks and 
controls; the second line sets standards and defines tools to be used to manage risk; and the third line provides independent assurance over the other 
two lines of defence.

The implementation of this approach requires the first line of defence to maintain a risk and control self-assessment for each business area. This 
records that area’s risks rated by impact and likelihood, before and after taking into account any mitigating controls. These controls are maintained 
in a library linking each risk to its appropriate controls. The second line has responsibility for carrying out control testing and themed reviews.

We have continued to invest time and resources into improving operational resilience both in the context of day-to-day operations and responding 
to specific events.

We are required to have effective procedures, systems and controls in place to detect and prevent financial crime. We are committed to complying 
with our legal and regulatory responsibilities in relation to financial crime, and have no appetite for non-compliance.

In order to support our growth plans, we’re dedicated to maintaining a robust control environment. This enables us to respond effectively to emerging 
financial crime threats, which are becoming more frequent, more varied and more innovative. The need to protect the Bank, our customers, assets and 
society from the impact of financial crime has never been more challenging. We constantly review our internal systems and processes to ensure they 
provide adequate protection against new and emerging threats. We hold induction and training programmes for colleagues – covering all aspects of 
financial crime – and these help us to protect customers and assets.

Our robust framework assesses and monitors risks in relation to customers, relationships, transactions and payments. The aim is to ensure that there 
are tailored, risk-based systems and controls in place to manage potential risks, and avoid losses, reputational impacts or degradation of customer 
experience.

Oversight and monitoring of our systems and controls is through the three lines of defence: (i) our risk and control self-assessment; (ii) dedicated, 
specialist colleagues operating the systems and controls in the first line of defence, overseen by the second line Anti-Money Laundering (‘AML’) Risk 
team; and (iii) Internal Audit. In addition, key risk indicators are in place with regular reports through the appropriate Bank Committees and the Board.

We have made significant investment to enhance systems, controls and people to support the execution of our business strategy, and to ensure that 
we have robust and sustainable models as we grow. This includes continuously enhancing our transaction monitoring and surveillance system for 
anti-money laundering, counter terrorist financing and sanctions.

35

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsRISK FACTORS AND MANAGEMENT CONTINUED

Emerging risks and mitigations
We have identified a number of emerging risks that have the potential to adversely impact our activities. These include:

Emerging risks

Mitigations

Developments in conduct regulation 
and regulatory activity

Cyber security

Brexit

Financial crime prevention

Prudential regulation

As we continue to grow, we’re invited to participate in more market studies and 
thematic reviews, with regulators proactively looking to pre-empt the next mis-
selling scandal and limit customer detriment. We continue to keep the customer at 
the heart of our business, and are confident that the absence of sales incentives for 
store colleagues – alongside a values-first culture at every level of the organisation 
– will ensure that we don’t fall foul of system-wide high-profile scandals such 
as those seen with payment protection insurance, packaged accounts and 
other products.

The Second Payment Services Directive comes into effect in 2018, with expansion 
in the Senior Managers and Certification regimes also on the way. Digital channels, 
cyber risk and systems infrastructure and resilience are likely to remain high on the 
regulatory agenda, as will changes to the macroeconomic environment. The FCA 
has alerted retail banking firms about the risks to technology resilience and we 
expect that this will lead to additional activity in 2018 and beyond.

With cyber-crime continuing to pose a significant threat to the financial services 
industry as a whole, we’ve invested in technology and expertise to strengthen our 
defences. Our dedicated Information Security team is responsible for leading the 
work in this area, including anti-phishing, data loss prevention and overseeing 
patching of the IT estate.

We partner with industry-leading experts to ensure that any risk management 
approach is robust and proportionate, and evolves in line with developing threats.

We are a member of several industry forums, which enable us to keep abreast of 
external developments that carry the potential to affect our operations. We also 
collect intelligence and assess our exposure, implementing preventative measures 
as appropriate, and continue to invest in cyber security.

The UK remains on course to exit the European Union in March 2019. We don’t 
have operations outside the UK, and less than 5% of accounts (by balance) are 
non-sterling denominated.

We note market concerns about the future post-Brexit. Amongst other 
impacts, Brexit may affect the availability of skilled colleagues and contractors 
to support companies’ growth plans, reduce customer confidence, and 
increase operating costs, particularly where firms depend on suppliers 
domiciled outside the UK. We continue to monitor this risk.

To tackle money laundering and corruption and recover the proceeds of crime 
and counter-terrorist financing, the Anti Money Laundering Directive IV took 
effect in July 2017, and legislative developments continue in this sector. These 
include the Criminal Finances Bill, which is being considered by Parliament.

The Bank of England will be phasing in the setting of a minimum requirement 
for own funds and eligible liabilities (‘MREL’). This is applicable to all UK banks 
and full compliance must be in place by 2022. Regulation around ring-fencing 
will also affect us in the future, and while we currently do not expect to be in 
scope in the next three to four years, some decisions, including investments 
we make and products we launch, will have a long-term impact which may 
affect us at a later time when we have become subject to these regulations.

36

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Emerging risks

Growth

Digital

Changes in accounting standards

Mitigations

Our pace of growth has the potential to increase operational risk – and, as a 
result, we have invested heavily in people and infrastructure. Our superior 
customer experience is supported by an end-to-end technology infrastructure 
that provides a single customer view, enabling better customer service and 
more efficient colleagues.

We continue to enhance our technology stack to enable customer-facing 
colleagues to focus on their core role of delivering amazing customer service, 
rather than struggling to operate systems.

Internet and mobile technologies are changing the way banks interact with 
customers and increasing the industry’s reliance on technology and infrastructure. 
We’re investing in our digital platforms and building resilient and secure 
technologies. Technological evolution will require us to be continually vigilant 
from a security perspective, and also to assess and review our conduct approach 
on an ongoing basis.

The new reporting requirements under IFRS 9 introduce new credit loss models 
and changes to the way in which firms must account for financial assets.

This report was approved by the Board and was signed on its behalf by:

Vernon W. Hill, II
Chairman
1 March 2018

Viability statement 

In accordance with provision C.2.2 of 
the revised UK Corporate Governance 
Code, the Board has assessed the 
prospects of the Group and Parent 
Company over a longer period than the 
12 months that has in practice been the 
focus of the ‘going concern’ provision.

While the Bank prepares a forecast 
spanning a seven-year period, the 
Directors concluded that a four-
year period was appropriate for the 
assessment, as it is the period over 
which the financial forecasts have 
greatest certainty. These forecasts 
are updated annually and reflect 
the Group’s established strategy of 

creating FANS through our unique 
culture and integrated model of 
stores and technology, in order 
to raise low-cost, sticky deposits 
and low-risk diversified lending.

Key assumptions included in the 
model include store, deposit and 
lending growth, as well as remaining 
appropriately capitalised. Over the 
forecast period, we expect to raise 
capital to fund our anticipated growth 
and to meet regulatory requirements.

Forecasts were subject to appropriate 
downside stress and sensitivity 
analysis over the assessment period, 

taking account of the Group’s current 
position, the Group’s experience of 
managing change and the impact 
of a number of severe yet plausible 
scenarios, based on the principal 
risks outlined in the Risk factors and 
management section of this report 
(page 30 to 37 of the Annual Report).

Based on the results of this analysis, 
the Directors have a reasonable 
expectation that the Group will be 
able to continue in operation and 
meet its liabilities as they fall due over 
the period of their assessment.

37

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL SUMMARY

CREATING FANS, CREATING 
CAREERS, CREATING A LEGACY 

Our AMAZEING behaviours

A
M
A
Z
E
I
N
G

Attend to 
every detail

Make every  
wrong right

Ask if you’re not 
sure – bump it up!

Zest is contagious, 
share it!

Exceed 
expectations

Inspire colleagues  
to create FANS!

Nurture colleagues  
so they grow

Game change 
because this is  
a revolution

Our approach

Environmental, social and governance 
(‘ESG’) at Metro Bank comes down 
to doing the right thing. And for a 
business focused on customers 
and colleagues, for the long term, 
that’s in our DNA. Our AMAZEING 
behaviours underpin everything we 
do. We focus on putting FANS first, 
making Metro Bank a great place to 
work, supporting our communities 
and managing the other impacts we 
have, for example on the environment. 
We are open and transparent about 
our responsible business activities.

Learn more about our approach at

metrobankonline.co.uk

Our priorities

Our long-term success depends on 
creating value for our customers and 
wider stakeholders. Knowing what 
matters to them helps us to evolve 
our vision and approach keeping 
stakeholders at the heart of what we do. 

In 2017, we asked Deloitte to assess our 
most material ESG priorities to inform 
our reporting on responsible business, 
and to highlight potential risks and 

opportunities that might inform the 
decisions we make. The six priorities are 
detailed in the materiality matrix below:

Our FANS  1

Brand awareness
Our business is built on our FANS 
recommending us to their friends, 
family and colleagues. To do this, it’s 
clearly essential that people know 
who we are – and in London, the 
area where we have the majority 
of our stores, we have brand 
recognition of 89%*. A fantastic 
performance for an organisation 
which attracts new customers 
solely through word of mouth. 

Knowing about Metro Bank is just 
half the story. For a brand that wants 
its customers to be FANS, the Net 
Promoter Score (‘NPS’)†, provides 
helpful insight on whether we’re 
achieving that ambition. During 
2017, our NPS was over 80%.

*   YouGov Plc. Total sample size was 1004 adults. 
Fieldwork was undertaken between 8th – 12th 
February 2018. The figures have been weighted 
and are representative of all London adults 
(aged 18+).
See page 136 for further details.

† 

Our priorities

Priorities

Description

1  Our FANS

Providing excellent service to 
customers each and every time

2  Our 

colleagues

Creating FANS by providing 
excellent service to each and 
every customer

More info

Page 38

Page 39

3  Our 

communities

Engaging with the communities 
we proudly serve

Page 40

4  Data privacy  
and security

Protecting our customers’ data 
just as we do their money

Page 40

5  Our planet

Being aware of our impact on 
the environment

Page 41

6  Our suppliers Treating everyone fairly and 

Page 41

doing our bit to make sure our 
partners do too

Materiality matrix

Medium materiality

High materiality

Our FANS

Our colleagues

Our planet

Our communities

Low materiality

Medium materiality

Data privacy
and security

Our suppliers

Relevance to Metro Bank

l

s
r
e
d
o
h
e
k
a
t
s
o
t
e
c
n
a
t
r
o
p
m

I

38

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC   
 
Our colleagues  2  

Culture and diversity
We are all equal at Metro Bank, and 
our inclusive approach celebrates 
diversity. Our colleagues represent 
the communities we serve and the 
locations where we’re based. We 
know that our supportive culture 
is one of the reasons we attract, 
retain and develop our colleagues, 
and importantly allow everyone to 
bring their whole selves to work.

We have a number of colleague 
networks, including WOW (Women 
on Work), Mpride for our LBGT+ 
colleagues and our most recent 
group Mbrace for our Black, Asian and 
Minority Ethnic (‘BAME’) community. 
All groups are open to all colleagues, 
regardless of race, gender or sexual 
orientation and all have the aim of 
helping everyone be at their very best.

Learn more about our AMAZEING culture 

We’re proud of our ethnic diversity:

Asian British
Asian Other
Black British
Black Other
Mixed British
Mixed Other
White British
White Irish
White Other
Undisclosed

24.3%
6.9%
8.2%
2.1%
2.1%
2.4%
41.1%
0.7%
8.0%
4.2%

We have gender diversity at every level 
in Metro Bank:

Executive Leadership Team (‘ELT’)¹

 4 (44%) 

 5 (56%)

Senior leaders²

 22 (28%) 

 57 (72%)

All colleagues

 1,441 (47%) 

 1,649 (53%)

and colleagues on page 24.

1  ELT are deemed to have responsibility for planning, 

directing or controlling Metro Bank or a 
strategically significant part of it. Figures exclude 
Executive Directors. Information on Board level 
diversity can be found on page 63.

2  Senior leaders are defined as members of the ELT 
(including Executive Directors) as well as those in a 
senior management position who report directly 
to a member of the ELT

39

Listening to colleagues 
Our colleagues are the heart of 
our business, so we work hard to 
understand how they feel about 
Metro Bank as an employer, as a 
place to work and as a provider of 
banking services. Every year we run a 
Voice of the Colleague engagement 
survey. In our 2017 survey, over 92% 
of colleagues took the time to share 
their views. We use the results to 
help us to continuously improve 
our colleagues’ experiences.

We partner with a text analytics 
company to give us deep insight around 
the free text questions we also ask 
every colleague as part of the survey.

The headlines from this year’s 
survey are:
•  97% of colleagues understand how 
their role contributes to the overall 
success of Metro Bank

•  96% of colleagues feel encouraged to 

escalate an issue, or ‘bump it up’ 
•  96% of colleagues think that Metro 

Bank is a good place to work

•  89% of colleagues believe there are 
opportunities for career progression 
and promotion

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL SUMMARY CONTINUED

ranging from financial education for 
young people and networking events, 
through to pumpkin carving, Christmas 
crafts and our legendary new store 
Grand Openings – complete with 
celebrity dogs, community disco and 
stilt walkers. We clocked up hundreds 
of hours worth of ‘Days to Amaze’, 
where our colleagues give time 
out of their working day to support 
the causes close to their hearts.

Our customers also supported three 
charities; Place2Be, Alzheimer’s 
Research UK and Battersea Dogs 
Home, through donations via our 
Magic Money Machines. 2017 also 
saw us extend our work supporting 
dementia sufferers with the roll-out of 
Dementia Friends training. Devised by 
the Alzheimer’s Society, this initiative 
helps colleagues learn more about 
dementia and how we can help 
our customers and friends or family 
members suffering from the disease.

Data privacy and security  4  

As well as trusting us with their 
money, FANS also trust us with 
something just as important, their 
data. We do everything we can to 
keep our customers’ details safe and 
to reduce the risk of financial crime, 
both against us and our customers.

We achieve this through continuing to 
invest in market leading technology. 
During the year we implemented 
Pindrop, spoof detection software 
which analyses each call made to our 
contact centres to identify any noises 
which are not consistent with our 
knowledge of the customer calling. 
This helps give us confidence that we 
are speaking to a genuine customer, 
therefore keeping their data and 
their money safe from fraudsters.

Recruiting talent 
We are the only bank to feature in the 
2017 Glassdoor Employees’ Choice 
Awards Top 50. The awards, now in their 
tenth year, rely solely on the feedback 
of current and former colleagues, who 
provide insight into their jobs, work 
environments and companies through 
the Glassdoor site. In addition, the 
website also included Craig Donaldson, 
our CEO, in its list of Most Highly Rated 
CEOs for the second year running.

This accolade, along with the Most 
People Focused CEO award at HR 
Magazine HR Excellence Awards 
and the Progression Programme of 
the Year award at the Social Mobility 
Awards 2017, validate our continuous 
focus on culture. By empowering 
colleagues and creating the conditions 
for them to exceed customers’ 
expectations, we allow them to thrive.

During the year, we created nearly 
600 new jobs and promoted 

more than 640 colleagues. We’re 
committed to supporting colleagues 
and investing in their careers, and 
over the past 12 months have helped 
60 new leaders ‘Learn to Lead’, 
supported 100 colleagues on fast 
track schemes and specialist studies, 
and enabled 350 colleagues to gain 
professional banking qualifications.

Also in 2017, we became an 
Apprenticeship Training Provider, 
allowing us to deliver 
apprenticeship training. 

Our communities  3

We are proud to be an integral part of 
the communities we serve. Because 
of our store footprint, over 3,000 
dedicated colleagues and the FANS 
who visit us every day, we were able to 
make a tangible difference to the towns, 
cities and communities we call home. 
We hosted over 2,500 events in our 
stores and local schools and businesses, 

It’s never too soon to learn about 
money
At Metro Bank, we’re passionate about 
making sure the young people in our 
communities have the opportunity to 
learn about money. Our Money Zone 
programme, launched in 2011, helps 
KS2 (age 8 to 10) children acquire 
financial skills and develop an 
understanding of how money, saving 
and banking works and the role it plays 
in their everyday lives. In 2017 we 
hosted over 900 sessions, reaching 
over 27,000 .

The programme is hosted over three 
sessions in class, with the fourth 
session being a store visit which really 
brings banking to life. The sessions are 
hosted by Metro Bank Prefects. 
Colleagues go through intensive 
training to be able to deliver this 
programme and many report that it is 
one of their highlights of the year. Since 
launching the Money Zone programme, 
we’ve helped more than 100,000 
young people become more confident 
around money.

40

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC   
Our planet  5  

We’re a growing bank, and are 
conscious of our impact on the 
environment. Across our entire 
store network, we give our FANS the 
choice to go paperless, reducing the 
amount of excess waste produced. 
As cards are printed in store with 
current account opening, our ‘walk 
out working’ approach means there is 
little need for extensive bureaucracy 
and paperwork. Where possible we 
aim to minimise our impact on the 
environment. This includes encouraging 
recycling and using energy efficient 
lighting in our branches and offices 
and introducing hybrid vehicles 
for our people’s business travel.

Our emissions during the year grew 
by 9%, significantly less than the 
growth of the bank. Emissions per 
FTE are down 12% thanks to the 
initiatives we have introduced.

We’ve reported on our emissions 
in line with the requirements of the 
Companies’ Act 2006 (Strategic and 
Directors’ Reports) Regulations 2013. 

Summary table for GHG emissions

GHG emissions

Scope 1 emissions

Scope 2 emissions

Total Scope 1 and 
2 emissions 

Tonnes 
CO2e
2017

1,312

4,668

Tonnes  
CO2e
2016

1,158

4,303

5,980

5,461

Our suppliers  6  

Building a revolution in British 
banking takes a lot more than just 
our colleagues. We pride ourselves 
on doing the right thing and 
maintaining the highest values in 
everything we do and this extends 
to the suppliers we engage with.

Anti-bribery and corruption
We are committed to maintaining the 
highest standards of ethics and integrity. 
Any act of bribery or corruption is 
unacceptable and we take the same 
approach with our suppliers. 

The assessment period is aligned 
with our financial year – 1 January 
2017 to 31 December 2017.

Details of the reporting criteria can be found 

in our separate ESG document which is 

available at metrobankonline.co.uk

In 2017 we established a specific 
supplier assurance function to 
ensure we maintain our high values 
in all aspects of our supply chain 
and conduct due diligence on 
new third party suppliers, including 
preventing bribery and corruption.

We selected operational control as 
our consolidation approach, and our 
boundary includes all entities and 
facilities either owned or under 
our control.

We understand that we have 
the opportunity to reduce our 
environmental impact not only directly 
through our operations, but also 
indirectly, through the customers 
we lend to and the products we 
provide. We will consider how best 
to report more on these indirect 
impacts in future reporting.

Modern slavery
Our philosophy is to conduct all 
business in an appropriate manner. 
Slavery, servitude, forced labour and 
human trafficking (modern slavery) is 
a crime and violation of fundamental 
human rights. We have zero tolerance 
to modern slavery and are committed 
to acting professionally, fairly and with 
integrity in all our business dealings and 
relationships wherever we operate. We 
aim to enforce appropriate systems and 
controls to help us to ensure modern 
slavery is not taking place anywhere in 
our business, in any of our suppliers or, 
through them, in our supply chains.

41

During 2017, we introduced a number 
of initiatives and processes to support 
our Modern Slavery Policy, including:
•  Publishing Metro Bank’s Modern 

Slavery Statement, approved by the 
Board and signed by Craig 
Donaldson, CEO, on our website in 
June 2017 (metrobankonline.co.uk)

•  Appointing a Modern Slavery 

Champion, who is a member of the 
Board, and whose responsibilities 
include: ensuring and overseeing 
the integrity, independence and 
effectiveness of the Policy; ensuring 
colleagues receive annual training 
to raise awareness of the Policy; 
and reporting to the Board at least 
once a year on the operation and 
effectiveness of the Policy. The 
first report to the Board is due in 
May 2018

•  Using the Financial Services 

Supplier Qualification System 
(‘FSQS’) to conduct due diligence 
on suppliers before contracting, on 
a risk basis, as appropriate

•  Developing a standard modern 

slavery clause for supplier 
relationships to ensure that 
suppliers are obliged to comply 
with the requirements of the 
Modern Slavery Act

•  Implementing an e-learning 

module, which was completed by 
colleagues in December 2017

Our Modern Slavery Statement is 

available at metrobankonline.co.uk

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL SUMMARY CONTINUED

Our policies

Our risk management policies and 
controls are reviewed regularly to 
reflect changes in market conditions, 
regulations, and our activities. Through 
regular training and additional 
standards, guidance and procedures, 
we aim to develop a robust and 
effective control environment in 
which all our colleagues understand 
their roles and obligations.

The Chief Risk Officer (‘CRO’) is 
accountable for leading the Risk 
function, which is the second 
line in our three lines of defence 

Policy

Description

model. The CRO is responsible 
for ensuring that appropriate risk 
management processes, policies 
and controls are in place, and that 
they are sufficiently robust, thereby 
ensuring that key risks are identified, 
assessed, monitored and mitigated. 
All policies are approved by the Board 
at appropriate Board committees 
following recommendations by the 
relevant management committee.

The CRO has access and a dotted 
reporting line to the Chairman of the 
Risk Oversight Committee. No material 
instances of non-compliance were 
identified in 2017 in relation to our risk 
management policies. A summary of 
our policies relating to our material 
ESG priorities can be found below.

This report was approved by the Board 
and was signed on its behalf by:

The CRO is also responsible for 
providing assurance to the Board and 
Directors that the principal risks are 
appropriately managed and that the 
Bank is operating within its risk appetite. 

Craig Donaldson
Chief Executive Officer
1 March 2018

ESG
Priorities

1, 2

Treating Customers Fairly

The policy reflects our goal to create fans through the delivery of consistently AMAZEING 
outcomes. This philosophy is embedded in our culture and is an integral part of our business 
model and strategy. Our zero tolerance for unfair customer outcomes is underpinned by our 
Conduct Risk framework which was approved by the Board.

Lending Policies (including 
residential mortgage, retail 
unsecured finance, private 
banking credit, commercial, 
arrears management)

These policies make sure that we’re lending in the right way. They ensure the effective and prudent 
management of credit risk, in-line with the risk appetite defined by the Board, regulatory 
requirements, statutes and industry good practice. 

1

Anti-Money Laundering/
Counter Terrorist Financing

The policy sets out the systems and controls to identify, assess, monitor and manage financial 
crime risks and the procedures in place to assess their effectiveness.

Diversity and Inclusion

The policy means that we treat our colleagues fairly. It sets out our commitment to employment 
policies which follow best practice, based on equal opportunities for all employees and the Board. 

Recruitment and selection

The policy relates to all recruitment related activities and is relevant for all colleagues and any 3rd 
party recruitment partners. The policy outlines responsibilities in accordance with Recruitment 
related legislation, regulation and company objectives.

Health and Safety

Whistleblowing

Anti-bribery and Corruption

The policy protects our customers and colleagues. It recognises our statutory duties and 
responsibilities under the relevant Health and Safety and Welfare legislation.

The policy encourages colleagues to disclose information, in good faith and without fear of unfair 
treatment, when they suspect any illegal or unethical conduct or wrongdoing affecting the Bank.

The policy outlines our approach in managing the risk of bribery and corruption and to ensure we 
conduct business in an honest and ethical way, with a zero tolerance approach to bribery and 
corruption.

Conflicts of Interest and 
related parties

The policy provides consistent practical guidance to all relevant parties in relation to the 
identification, recording and maintenance of actual and perceived conflicts of interest. 

Business continuity

Data

Outsourcing

Modern Slavery

The policy makes sure we are able to continue delivering services to our customers at acceptable 
levels if something unexpected were to happen. It addresses impacts to the continuity of critical 
business activities in the case of man made disasters, natural disasters or other material events. 

The policy sets out our objectives and expectations in managing data and data governance 
practices. It makes sure that data is managed, governed, accessed, protected, utilised and 
disclosed appropriately. It also focuses on the quality of key data elements and their ongoing 
maintenance. 

The policy ensures that when we rely on a third party for key processes and activities, we take the 
reasonable steps to avoid any unfair customer outcomes and unnecessary operational risk. 

The policy describes our approach towards preventing slavery, servitude, forced and compulsory 
labour and human trafficking in any of our operations or at any of our suppliers and, through 
them, our supply chains.

1, 2

2, 3

2

2

2

2

3

4

1, 4

3, 6

6

Our planet (priority 5) is managed through our various policies.  
As a growing bank, we recognise the need to also minimise our impact on  
the environment. To date we have successfully driven progress without a bespoke 
environmental policy, but we will continue to review this approach  
for appropriateness.

42

Learn more about our policies with our separate ESG document which 

is available at metrobankonline.co.uk

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC   
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE  
OVERVIEW

A strong governance framework supporting  
the long-term success of the Company.

Our governance structure is largely unchanged from 2016. 
The Board support management and help develop strategy 
through effective debate and challenge. The Chairman sets 
the Board’s agenda and ensures that it devotes sufficient 
time to the Bank’s vision. The Board has an open culture 
which encourages challenge; it has a diverse mix of skills 
and experience which enables it to continue to operate 
effectively. All of the Non-Executive Directors are 
independent and, by encouraging open and frank 
discussion, we ensure that no individual Director or group 
of Directors can dominate discussion or decision-making. 

Alongside our day to day governance work, in 2017 we 
carried out an external Board evaluation in line with the 
requirements of the Code. The external Board evaluation 
process will complete in early 2018 and will help to ensure 
that the Board and its Committees continue to operate at 
maximum effectiveness. More details on the external Board 
evaluation process can be found on page 52. 

We also coordinated the appointment of a new Non-
Executive Director. Monique Melis joined the Board in June 
2017; she brings a rare combination of international 
regulatory and compliance expertise as well as proven 
entrepreneurial experience gained in founding and growing 
her own successful business. Her insight, knowledge and 
skills complement the wealth of experience on the Board. 
More information regarding the process for appointments 
to the Board can be found in the Nomination Committee 
Report on page 62. We arranged a thorough and robust 
induction for Monique and continue to provide ongoing 
support to her as she settles into her new role. More details 
on new Director inductions can be found on page 52. 

I will be retiring from my position as CFO and Company 
Secretary at the end of March 2018. I would like to welcome 
David Arden, who joins us from Sainsbury’s Bank. David will 
be taking over the reins from me in leading the Bank’s 
governance framework as both CFO and Company 
Secretary. I wish David well in his new role. 

Mike Brierley
Chief Financial Officer and Company Secretary
1 March 2018

Mike Brierley – Chief Financial Officer and Company Secretary

Creating FANS is at  
the heart of everything  
we do, this is reflected in  
our robust governance 
framework

I am pleased to set out Metro Bank’s Corporate Governance 
Statement for 2017. This has been a busy and exciting year 
– one where we’ve continued to surprise and delight our 
customers and created even more FANS. As a result, we’ve 
entered our first full year of profitability. Our governance 
structure provides sufficient challenge and support to the 
Bank and its Executive Leadership Team, enabling it to 
continue to grow in a safe and sustainable manner. 

Metro Bank has a premium listing on the London Stock 
Exchange and is required to comply with the UK Corporate 
Governance Code (‘the Code’) published by the Financial 
Reporting Council in 2016 or to explain any areas of non-
compliance and our reasons for these. I am pleased to report 
that during the period under review, we fully complied with 
the Code.

43

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsBOARD OF DIRECTORS

1 Vernon W. Hill, II
Chairman and Founder  N
Vernon was the founder and Chairman 
of Commerce Bancorp, a start-up bank 
established in 1973 and sold to Toronto-
Dominion Bank in 2007 for US$8.5 billion, 
with US$50 billion in assets and 440 
branches. Vernon is involved in banking 
and non-banking related businesses 
and voluntary ventures in the US. He 
is a graduate of the Wharton School 
of the University of Pennsylvania.
Vernon is Chairman of Republic 
First Bancorp, inc.

2 Craig Donaldson
Chief Executive Officer
Craig was previously Managing Director, 
Retail Products and Direct Channels, of 
RBS UK. He was also Chairman of the Retail 
Asset and Liabilities Committee and Retail 
Product Board and a member of the Retail 
Board, Retail Risk Committee and RBS UK 
Asset and Liabilities Committee. He serves 
on the Board of Directors at TheCityUK as 
Chairman of the Audit and Risk Committee.

3 Michael Brierley
Chief Financial Officer
Mike was previously Chief Financial Officer 
UK and Europe and Chief Risk Officer 
Europe at Capital One Bank (Europe). He 
has also worked as Chief Financial Officer 
for Royal Trust Bank, Financial Controller at 
Industrial Bank of Japan, Chief Financial
Officer of Gentra Limited and Director, 
Business Risk at Barclaycard. He is a Fellow of
the Institute of Chartered Accountants.

5 Keith Carby
Non-Executive Director   A   R   N
Keith was formerly CEO of the Caerus 
Capital Group. He is Non-Executive 
Chairman of both Censeo Ltd and Mill 
Capital Private Equity (Dubai). Keith was 
Joint Founder and Managing Director of 
J. Rothschild Assurance (now St. James’s 
Place). He also founded the Financial 
Services Forum and was a founding 
trustee of the 9/11 London Project.

4 Stuart Bernau
Non-Executive Director   A    O
Stuart has specialised in financial services 
for over 40 years, including 13 years as a 
main Board Director of Nationwide Building 
Society. He was Chairman and CEO of 
Chelsea Building Society and has chaired 
the Council of Mortgage Lenders and the 
Financial Services Sector Skills Council. 
He was Special Adviser to the Treasury 
Select Committee from 2013 to 2015.

6 Roger Farah
Non-Executive Director  R   N
Roger is Chairman of Tiffany & Co. He 
is a former Executive Vice Chairman 
of Ralph Lauren Corporation, also its 
President and Chief Operating Officer. 
Roger was previously Chairman and 
CEO of Footlocker, President and Chief 
Operating Officer of Macy’s, Chairman 
and CEO of Federated Merchandising 
Services and Chairman and CEO of Rich’s 
Department Stores. Roger is a Director of 
Aetna and The Progressive Corporation. 

Key to Committees

 A  Audit

R  Remuneration

N  Nomination

 O  Risk Oversight

1

4

2

3

5

6

44

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  7 Lord Flight
Non-Executive Director  R   N
Howard was Conservative MP for Arundel 
and South Downs, West Sussex, from 1997 to 
2005, when he held Shadow posts, including 
Shadow Chief Secretary to the Treasury. 
He was a member of the Shadow Cabinet 
from 2002 to 2004. He was appointed to 
the House of Lords in 2011. He co-founded 
Guinness Flight Global Asset Management, 
and is Chairman of Aurora Investment Trust, 
Downing Four VCT and Flight and Partners, 
a Director of Investec Asset Management, 
Edge Performance VCT, a Commissioner of 
the Guernsey Financial Services Commission 
and Chairman of the EIS Association.

8 Alastair (Ben) Gunn
Senior Independent Director   O
Ben was Chief Executive and then Chairman 
of Friends Provident Life and Pensions Ltd 
as well as a Director of Friends Provident. 
As Chief Executive, he was responsible for 
all aspects of the Friends Provident Group’s 
life and pensions activities worldwide. More 
recently, he was the Senior Independent 
Director at Aviva UK and Chairman 
of the Audit Committee at Avelo.

9 Gene Lockhart
Non-Executive Director   A    O
Gene is a Special Adviser to General Atlantic 
and Chairman and Managing General 
Partner of MissionOG LLC. He was President 
and CEO of MasterCard Worldwide, and 
subsequently President of the Global Retail 
Bank at Bank of America. Prior to this, Gene 
was the CEO of Midland Bank UK and 
Chairman of First Direct and Thomas Cook.

10 Anna (Monique) Melis
Non-Executive Director
Monique is a Managing Director and the 
Global Head of Regulatory Consulting at 
Duff & Phelps and is a member of Duff and 
Phelps’ Luxembourg Management Company 
Board. With extensive financial services and 
regulatory experience across established 
and growth markets, her appointments 
have included Executive Board member at 
Kinetic Partners and roles at: the Cayman 
Islands Regulator and Stock Exchange 
(‘CSX’), the Financial Services Authority 
and the Securities and Futures Authority. 

11 Sir Michael Snyder
Non-Executive Director   A    O
Michael was Senior Partner of Kingston 
Smith between 1979 and 2016, and is now 
a consultant to the firm. He has advised 
Government over many years, including 
chairing the National Business Angels 
Network and as a member of the Small 
Business Council and Small Business 
Investment Taskforce. He was also founder 
Co-Chairman of the Government’s 
Professional and Business Services Council 
and chaired the Association of Practising 
Accountants. He is Senior Partner of 
Bramdean Consultants LLP and an elected 
member of the City of London Corporation, 
which he led for five years as Chairman of 
the Policy and Resources Committee.

7

8

9

10

11

45

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsDIRECTORS’ REPORT

The Directors of the Company who were in office during the 
year and up to the date of signing the financial statements 
and summaries of their key skills and experience are set out 
on pages 44 to 45.

The Directors have pleasure in presenting their Annual Report 
for the year ended 31 December 2017. As set out more fully in 
the ‘Summary of significant accounting policies’ within ‘Notes 
to the financial statements, Accounting policies’, this report 
for the consolidated Group has been prepared in accordance 
with International Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRS’) as 
adopted by the EU and includes the Corporate Governance 
Report set out on pages 49 to 53.

The Directors consider the Annual Report for the year ended 
31 December 2017, taken as a whole, is fair, balanced and 
understandable and provides the information necessary for 
shareholders to assess the Company’s position and 
performance, business model and strategy.

Principal activities
Our principal activities during 2017 were the provision of 
banking and related services. Metro Bank is a deposit-taking 
and lending institution with a focus on retail and small and 
medium-size commercial customers, offering consistent fair 
pricing and excellent customer service. We’re authorised to 
accept deposits under the Financial Services and Markets Act 
2000, have a Consumer Credit Act licence and are members 
of the Financial Services Compensation Scheme.

Results and dividend
The results for the year are set out in the consolidated 
statement of comprehensive income on page 87.

No dividend was declared or paid during 2017 (2016: £nil). 
The Directors do not anticipate declaring a dividend in the 
near future.

Significant events
Further to the authority granted by shareholders at the 2017 
AGM, on 26 July 2017 a further 8,020,000 new ordinary 
shares of an aggregate nominal value of £8.02 were issued at 
£34.65 per share. The issue followed the completion of a non 
pre-emptive cash placing of new ordinary shares, for gross 
consideration of £278 million. The new shares were admitted 
for trading on the London Stock Exchange on 28 July 2017. 

Articles of Association
The Articles of Association can be found on our website: 
metrobankonline.co.uk.

Share capital
Our called-up share capital, together with details of shares 
allotted during the year, is shown in note 16 to the financial 
statements on page 111.

There are no restrictions on the transfer of the Company’s 
share capital and there are no shares or stock which carry 
specific rights with regards to control of the Company. 

The Directors seek annual authority from shareholders to allot 
new ordinary shares and to dis-apply pre-emption rights of 
existing shareholders in accordance with the Investment 
Association Share Management Guidelines. 

Directors’ interests
Details of the Directors’ beneficial interests are set out in the 
annual report on remuneration on pages 70 to 79.

Directors’ indemnities and Directors’ and Officers’ Liability 
insurance
Details regarding deeds of indemnity and Directors’ and 
Officers’ Liability insurance are set out in the Corporate 
Governance Report on page 53.

Major interests in shares
Information provided to the Group by substantial 
shareholders pursuant to the Disclosure and Transparency 
Rules (‘DTR’) is published via a Regulatory Information Service.

As at 31 December 2017, the Group has been notified under 
DTR 5 of the interests in its issued share capital, and these are 
set out in the table below. All such shareholders have the right 
to vote in all circumstances at general meetings.

As at 31 December 2017

Ordinary  
shares held

% of total 
ordinary 
shares 

Direct/
indirect 
interest

Cohen Private Ventures

7,912,848

9.85

Indirect

Wellington 
Management Group 
LLP

Fidelity Management 
and Research

3,641,556

4.53

Indirect

6,850,023

8.53

Indirect

There have been no notifications received in the period from 
31 December 2017 to the date of this report. 

Greenhouse gas emissions
Our energy consumption and associated greenhouse gas 
emissions during 2017 are set out in the Strategic report on 
page 41.

Employee involvement
We encourage employee involvement in the Bank. Increasing 
employee awareness of the financial and economic factors 
that affect us plays a major role in maintaining our customer 
focus. All employees are eligible to participate in our share 
option and/or share buy and share pool schemes.

Diversity
We’re committed to employment policies which follow best 
practice, based on equal opportunities for all employees. We 
aim for our workforce to reflect the diverse communities in 
which we operate and recognise that diversity is not only a 
key part of a responsible business strategy, but also supports a 
strong customer experience. We give full and fair 
consideration to all applications for employment.

Disabled employees
Applications for employment by disabled persons are always 
fully considered, bearing in mind the abilities of the applicant 
concerned. In the event of employees becoming disabled, we 
make every effort to ensure that their employment continues 
and that we provide appropriate training and support. Our 
policy is that the training, career development and promotion 
of disabled persons should, as far as possible, be identical to 
that of other employees.

46

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Modern slavery
We are committed to supporting the communities in which 
we operate in order to enable them to develop both socially 
and economically. Our policy is to conduct all business in an 
appropriate manner and we have zero tolerance for modern 
slavery. The initiatives we have developed in 2017 can be 
found on page 41.

Listing rule disclosures
For the purposes of LR 9.8.4CR, the information required to 
be disclosed by LR 9.8.4R can be found in the following 
sections of the report:

Item

Location, where applicable

Detail of long-term 
incentive schemes

Remuneration Report 
Financial statements note 17

Our Modern Slavery Statement is available 

at metrobankonline.co.uk

Contracts of significance

Any contracts of significance 
or related party transactions 
can be found in note 26 to the 
financial statements

Risk management
The Directors confirm that they have undertaken a robust 
assessment of the principal risks facing the Group. We seek to 
manage all risks that arise from our activities. Details of risk 
management systems and the processes in place in relation 
to financial reporting, and details of risk management 
objectives and policies, are shown in the Risk Factors and 
Management Report on pages 30 to 37. As a result of normal 
business activities, we are exposed to a variety of risks – and 
the principal risks and uncertainties that we face are shown in 
the Risk Factors and Management Report.

Going concern
The financial statements are prepared on a going concern 
basis, as the Directors are satisfied that the Group and Parent 
Company have the resources to continue in business for the 
foreseeable future.

Viability Statement
Our Viability Statement is set out on page 37.

Auditors
The auditors, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, have indicated 
their willingness to continue in office and a resolution seeking 
to reappoint them will be proposed at the Annual General 
Meeting. The Audit Committee will be conducting an audit 
tender in 2018 and more details of this can be found on 
page 57. 

Political donations
We made no political donations in the year ending 
31 December 2017 (2016: £nil).

Research and development
We have an ongoing commitment to make banking more 
convenient for customers, and in 2017 we continued to invest 
in systems, procedures, products and services. As a result, we 
have capitalised £70 million of intangible assets.

Post balance sheet events
A summary of the key post balance sheet events is set out in 
note 31 to the financial statements on page 131.

Annual General Meeting
Details of this year’s AGM can be found in the Shareholder 
Information section on page 137.

Future developments
Our business and future plans are reviewed in the Chairman’s 
Statement, CEO statement and the Strategic report.

Corporate Governance Statement
The Corporate Governance Report on pages 49 to 53 in 
accordance with Rule 7.2 of the Disclosure and Transparency 
Rules and Rule 9.8.6 (5) and (6) of the Listing Rules forms part 
of this Directors’ Report.

Statement of Directors’ responsibilities
Our Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report 
and the financial statements in accordance with applicable 
law and regulations.

Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial 
statements for each financial year. Under that law, the 
Directors have prepared the Group and Parent Company 
financial statements in accordance with International 
Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRSs’) as adopted by the 
European Union and applicable law and have elected to 
prepare the Parent Company financial statements on the 
same basis.

Under company law, the Directors must not approve the 
financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a 
true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Group and the 
Company and of the profit or loss of the Group for that 
period. In preparing these financial statements, the Directors 
are required to:
•  select suitable accounting policies and then apply 

them consistently;

•  make judgements and accounting estimates that are 

reasonable and prudent;

•  state whether applicable IFRSs as adopted by the European 

Union have been followed, subject to any material 
departures disclosed and explained in the financial 
statements; and

•  prepare the financial statements on the going concern 

basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the 
Company and the Group will continue in business.

The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate 
accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain 
our transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy 
at any time the financial position of the Company and the 
Group, and enable them to ensure that the financial 
statements comply with the Companies Act 2006. They 
are also responsible for safeguarding our assets and taking 
reasonable steps for the prevention and detection of fraud 
and other irregularities.

47

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsDIRECTORS’ REPORT CONTINUED

The Directors are responsible for the maintenance and 
integrity of the information included on our website. 
Legislation in the UK governing the preparation and 
dissemination of financial statements may differ from 
legislation in other jurisdictions.

Directors’ statement pursuant to the disclosure and 
transparency rules
Each of the Directors, whose names and functions are 
listed on pages 44 and 45, confirm that, to the best of 
their knowledge:
•  the financial statements, which have been prepared in 

accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European Union, 
give a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial 
position and profit or loss of the Group taken as a 
whole; and

•  the Strategic report contained in the Annual Report 

includes a fair review of the development and performance 
of the business and the position of the Group taken as a 
whole, together with a description of the principal risks and 
uncertainties that it faces.

Statement of disclosure of information to auditors
Each Director in office at the date of this Report, and whose 
name is listed on pages 44 and 45, confirms that to the best 
of his knowledge:
•  there is no relevant audit information of which the 

Company’s auditors are unaware; and

•  has taken all the reasonable steps that he ought to have 

taken as a Director to make himself aware of any relevant 
audit information and to establish that the Company’s 
auditors are aware of the information.

The confirmation is given and should be interpreted in 
accordance with the provisions of section 418 of the 
Companies Act 2006.

The Directors’ Report comprising pages 46 to 48 has 
been approved by the Board of Directors and signed  
on its behalf by

Mike Brierley
Chief Financial Officer and Company Secretary
1 March 2018

48

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT

Governance framework
The Board has a coherent corporate governance structure with clearly defined responsibilities and accountabilities. These  
have been designed to safeguard and enhance long-term shareholder value and provide a robust framework in which to 
deliver our strategy.

Corporate governance structure

Metro Bank Board

Chief Executive Officer

Remuneration 
Committee

Nomination 
Committee

Audit  
Committee

Risk Oversight 
Committee

Executive Management Committees

Leadership
The role of the Board
The Board is responsible to our shareholders and sets our strategy for achieving long-term success. It is also ultimately 
responsible for the management, governance, controls, risk management, direction and performance of the Bank.

The composition of the Board
The Board currently consists of the Non-Executive Chairman, two Executive Directors (the CEO and CFO) and eight Non-
Executive Directors. The Company considers the Non-Executive Directors to be independent. This is compliant with the Code, 
which requires that at least half of the Directors of a premium listed company should be independent and free of any business 
relationships that could compromise the exercise of independent and objective judgement.

The Directors’ skills and experience span a wide range of sectors; a skills matrix is shown below. Each Director brings a wealth 
of experience and skills to bear on all aspects of the management of the Company. 

Board skills

Retail financial 
services

Credit  
risk

Financial  
crime

Governance

Regulatory

Retailing 
experience

Accounting/
financial incl. 
audit

Leadership

49

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsCORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT CONTINUED

Division of responsibilities between the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
The Board has formally documented the separate roles and responsibilities of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 
and more detail on this can be found on the Company’s website metrobankonline.co.uk/investor-relations.

Board attendance, role and responsibilities 

Role

Meetings attended 2017

Responsibility

Non-Executive Chairman 
Vernon W. Hill, II

Chief Executive Officer 
Craig Donaldson

Chief Financial Officer and 
Company Secretary
Mike Brierley

Vernon leads the Board and is responsible for its effectiveness and governance. He sets the tone for 
the Company, including overseeing the development of the Bank’s business culture and standards in 
relation to the conduct of business and the behaviour of employees. He is responsible for ensuring 
that there are strong links between the Board and management and between the Board and 
shareholders. He sets the Board agenda and ensures that sufficient time is allocated to important 
matters, in particular those relating to our strategic direction. He reports to the Board and is 
responsible for the leadership and overall effectiveness of the Board. 

Craig is responsible for the day-to-day management of our operations, for recommending our 
strategic direction to the Board and for implementing the strategic direction agreed by the Board. He 
is supported in decision-making by the Executive Leadership Team. Craig reports to the Chairman and 
to the Board directly and is responsible for all executive management matters of the Bank. 

As Chief Financial Officer, Mike has responsibility for planning, implementing, managing and 
controlling all financial-related activities of the Company, both day-to-day and for the long term. He is 
responsible for managing the Bank’s financial position including allocation and maintenance of 
capital, funding and liquidity. Mike reports to Craig and has oversight of the Treasury, Legal, 
Procurement and Investor Relations functions and is also responsible for producing and ensuring the 
integrity of the Bank’s financial information and regulatory reporting. As Company Secretary, Mike is 
responsible for advising and supporting the Chairman and the Board on good corporate governance 
and best boardroom practice. 

Non-Executive Directors

Responsibility

Senior Independent 
Director
Ben Gunn

Independent Non-Executive 
Director 
Keith Carby

Independent Non-Executive 
Director 
Gene Lockhart

Independent Non-Executive 
Director 
Monique Melis*

Independent Non-Executive 
Director 
Stuart Bernau

Independent Non-Executive 
Director 
Sir Michael Snyder

Independent Non-Executive 
Director 
Roger Farah

Independent Non-Executive 
Director 
Lord Flight

*  Appointed 21 June 2017.

Ben Gunn is the Senior Independent Director (‘SID’). His role is to act as a sounding board for the 
Chairman and to serve as an intermediary for Directors when necessary.

The SID is also available to shareholders if they have concerns that have not been resolved through 
the normal channels of Chairman, Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer. The SID will 
attend meetings with, and listen to the views of, major shareholders to help to develop a balanced 
understanding of their issues and concerns if contact with the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer or 
Chief Financial Officer is inappropriate. The SID also acts as the conduit, as required, for the views of 
other Non-Executive Directors on the performance of the Chairman and conducts the Chairman’s 
annual performance evaluation.

The role of the Non-Executive Directors is to constructively challenge proposals on strategic 
direction. Each Non-Executive Director brings specific sector experience and knowledge to the 
Board and its Committees. Their contributions provide independent views on matters of strategy, 
performance, risk and conduct. The Non-Executive Directors were appointed for an initial two-year 
term but are re-elected on an annual basis

50

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Each Director has committed to dedicate as much time as is 
necessary to the Company and the Non-Executive Directors’ 
letters of appointment set out that they should be prepared to 
dedicate at least 20 days per year to the Company.

Directors are expected to attend all meetings of the Board, 
and the Committees on which they sit, and to devote 
sufficient time to the Company’s affairs to enable them to 
fulfil their duties. If Directors are unable to attend a meeting, 
their comments on papers to be considered at the meeting 
will be discussed in advance with the Chairman or Company 
Secretary so that their contribution can be included in the 
wider Board discussion.

Matters reserved for the Board
The Board is responsible for setting and managing our 
strategic direction. The operation of the Board is documented 
in a formal schedule of matters reserved for its approval, 
which is reviewed annually. These include matters relating to 
the decisions concerning our strategic aims and long-term 
objectives, the structure and capital of the Group, financial 
reporting and controls, risk management and various 
statutory and regulatory matters. The Board is also 
responsible for effective communication with shareholders, 
any changes to Board or Committee membership or 
structure, and has authority to recommend the Directors’ 
Remuneration Policy to shareholders. The Board delegates 
responsibility for day-to-day management of the business to 
the Chief Executive Officer and sets out the basis for 
delegation of authorities from the Board to its Committees.

Board decisions and activity during the year
The Board has a schedule of regular business, financial and 
operational matters, and each Board Committee has a 
schedule of reserved matters to ensure that all areas for which 
the Board has responsibility are addressed and reviewed 
during the year.

The Chairman, assisted by the Company Secretary, is 
responsible for ensuring that the Directors receive accurate 
and timely information. The Company Secretary compiles 
the Board and Committee papers, which are circulated to 
Directors in advance of meetings. The Company Secretary 
also ensures that any feedback or suggestions for 
improvement on Board papers is fed back to management. 
The Company Secretary provides minutes of each meeting 
and every Director is aware of the right to have any 
concerns minuted. 

During 2017, the key areas the Board has focused on include:

Areas of focus

Strategic  
direction

Governance and 
compliance

Policy reviews  
and updates

Investment proposals  
and portfolio  
acquisitions

Creating  
FANS

Cyber resilience, Risk 
monitoring and review

4

8

2

6

0

3

7

9

1

5

C

AC

Annual and quarterly 
reporting

Property and  
store expansion

Regulatory and  
external affairs, PSDII  
and open banking

Capital structure 
and fundraising

Reports from the CEO, CFO and CRO are standing items on 
every agenda. The Company Secretary reports on legal, 
regulatory and governance matters and updates the Board 
on any changes to their statutory duties or the regulatory 
environment. The Chairman of each Committee reports on 
the proceedings of the previous Committee meeting at the 
next Board meeting.

Senior management and advisers are invited to attend Board 
and Committee meetings, where appropriate, to present, 
contribute to discussion and advise members of the Board or 
its Committees on particular matters. The involvement of 
senior management at Board and Committee discussions 
strengthens the relationship between the Board and senior 
management and helps to provide the Board with a greater 
understanding of operations and strategic direction.

51

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsCORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT CONTINUED

Board Committees
The Board has delegated specific responsibilities to each of 
the Audit, Risk Oversight, Nomination and Remuneration 
Committees, and reports for each are set out on pages 54 to 
70. Each Committee has written Terms of Reference setting 
out its duties, authority and reporting responsibilities. 

Copies of all the Committee Terms of Reference are 
available on our website metrobankonline.co.uk. 

We keep the Terms of Reference of each Committee under 
continuous review to ensure they remain appropriate and 
reflect any changes in legislation, regulation or best practice. 
They are also reviewed formally every year by the relevant 
Committee and the Board. Each Committee comprises 
independent Non-Executive Directors. Any future changes to 
the Committees will be made after the review and 
recommendation of the Nomination Committee.

Effectiveness
The skills and experience of Board members are set out on 
pages 44 and 45. The experience and knowledge of each of 
the Directors gives them the ability to constructively 
challenge strategy and to scrutinise performance.

Induction of new Directors
All the Directors have been members of the Board since the 
Company’s listing in March 2016, with the exception of 
Monique Melis who was appointed in June 2017. New 
Directors undergo a formal induction programme upon 
appointment which is tailored to their existing knowledge and 
experience. Non-Executive Directors meet the Chairman and 
the Chief Executive as part of the Nomination Committee’s 
selection process and then again on appointment for a 
thorough briefing on all relevant aspects of the Company. 
They will also meet the Company Secretary, senior 
management and any relevant advisers for briefings on their 
responsibilities as Directors and on our business, finances, 
risks, strategy, procedures and the markets where we operate.

All Directors were advised of the time required to fulfil the role 
prior to appointment and confirmed they can make the 
necessary commitment. This requirement is also included in 
their letters of appointment. The Board is satisfied that the 
Chairman and each of the Non-Executive Directors is able to 
devote sufficient time to the Company’s business. There has 
been no change in the Chairman’s other time commitments 
during the year.

Performance
Every year, the Board undertakes an evaluation of its 
performance and governance, as well as that of its 
Committees and individual Directors.

In accordance with the UK Corporate Governance Code, the 
Board conducted an externally facilitated evaluation in 2017. 
The last external evaluation was carried out in 2014.

A competitive tender was conducted for Board Evaluation 
Services, led by the Senior Independent Director, which 
selected Deloitte LLP to conduct the Board Evaluation in 2017. 
Deloitte LLP observed a number of strengths and identified 
some areas for improvement and the Board has agreed an 
action plan to address these areas during the course of 2018. 
Deloitte LLP provides certain Tax and Consulting services. The 
Board Evaluation was conducted by an independent team 
and the Board is satisfied that the advice received has been 
challenging, objective and independent.

52

External Board evaluation process

First stage

Second stage

Third stage

Briefing and  
Board  
questionnaire

One-to-one 
interviews  
with Board

Results  
collated,  
reported and  
evaluated

Discussion  
with  
the SID

Board  
discussion

Action  
plan  
agreed

Development
The Company Secretary ensures that all Directors are kept 
abreast of changes in relevant legislation and regulations, with 
the assistance of our external advisers where appropriate.

Executive Directors take part in our appraisal procedure. This 
sets tangible targets against which performance is measured.

Non-Executive Directors are encouraged to attend seminars 
and briefings, at the Company’s expense, in areas considered 
to be appropriate for their own professional development, 
including governance and issues relevant to the Committees 
on which they sit.

Metro Bank Board and Committees

Financial

Regulatory

Risk

•  IFRS 9 – 

accounting 
judgements and 
impairment 
methodology

•  Cyber risk 
update

•  Market Abuse 
Regulation
•  Disclosure 

functions and 
procedures

•  Inside 

information
•  PDMR dealings 
and notifications

•  Class 

transactions and 
related party 
transactions

Risk management
The Board believes that effective risk management is crucial 
to the Bank’s strategic objectives and long-term success.  
The Board has overall responsibility for ensuring risk is 
effectively managed.

Our approach to risk is further detailed on pages 30 to 37. The 
Risk Oversight Committee reviews the effectiveness of the 
risk management process on the Board’s behalf, and its 
approach to this can be found in the Risk Oversight 
Committee Report on pages 59 to 61.

External appointments
In appropriate circumstances, the Board may authorise 
Executive Directors to take non-executive positions in other 
companies and organisations. Such appointments should 
broaden their experience, provided the time commitment 
does not conflict with the Director’s duties to the Company. 
The appointment to such positions is subject to the prior 
approval of the Board.

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Relations with shareholders
The Board continues to place great importance on regular 
two-way engagement with shareholders throughout the year. 
Investor meetings are undertaken by the founder and 
Chairman, Vernon W. Hill, II, the CEO, Craig Donaldson, and 
the CFO, Mike Brierley, supported by the Director of Investor 
Relations. During 2017, the team participated in over 180 
individual and group meetings in the US, UK and Europe, as 
well as presenting at various investor conferences. 
Institutional shareholders have the opportunity to meet with 
the Chairman and/or other Non-Executive Directors to 
discuss any areas of concern.

The Investor Relations function reports to the Board on a 
regular basis on matters including share price performance, 
changes in the shareholder register, analyst and investor 
feedback and significant market updates, with the assistance 
of the Bank’s corporate brokers. The Investor Relations team 
is responsible for ongoing communication with shareholders, 
analysts and investors. All financial and regulatory 
announcements, as well as other important business 
announcements, are published in the ‘Investor Relations’ 
section of our website and stakeholders can subscribe to 
receive news updates by email by registering online on the 
website: metrobankonline.co.uk/investor-relations/. Contact 
details for the Investor Relations and Company Secretariat are 
available for any shareholders, analysts or investors who wish 
to ask a question.

During the year ended 31 December 2017, none of the 
Bank’s Executive Directors held directorships in any other 
quoted company.

Conflicts of interest
At each meeting the Board considers Directors’ conflicts of 
interest. The Company’s Articles of Association provide for the 
Board to authorise any actual or potential conflicts of interest.

The Company has a commercial relationship with InterArch, 
Inc. (‘InterArch’), a firm which is owned by Shirley Hill, the wife 
of Vernon W. Hill, II. The Audit Committee has considered this 
relationship and concluded that the arrangements with 
InterArch are on terms which are at least as beneficial to the 
Bank as those which could be obtained from an independent 
third party. Further details are set out in the Audit Committee 
Report on page 56 and in note 26 to the financial statements.

Independent professional advice
Directors have access to independent professional advice at 
the Company’s expense. In addition, they have access to the 
advice and services of the Company Secretary, who is 
responsible for advice on corporate governance matters to 
the Board.

Directors’ indemnities and insurance
We provide Directors and Officers with appropriate insurance, 
which is reviewed annually. In addition, Directors and Officers 
have received an indemnity from the Bank against (a) any 
liability incurred by or attaching to the Director or Officer in 
connection with any negligence, default, breach of duty, or 
breach of trust by them in relation to the Bank or any 
associated company; and (b) any other liability incurred by or 
attaching to the Director or Officer in the actual or purported 
execution and/or discharge of their duties and/or the exercise 
or purported exercise of their powers and/or otherwise in 
relation to/or in connection with their duties, powers or office 
other than certain excluded liabilities including to the extent 
that such an indemnity is not permitted by law.

Appointment and retirement of Directors 
The Board may appoint Directors to the Board. Newly 
appointed Directors must stand for election by shareholders 
at the AGM following their appointment. In accordance with 
the provisions of the Code, all continuing Directors of the 
Company will offer themselves for annual re-election at the 
2018 Annual General Meeting, with the exception of Mike 
Brierley, who is retiring from his role as Chief Financial Officer 
and Company Secretary in March 2018. The Board would like 
to thank Mike for his significant contribution to the Bank’s 
growth over his career at Metro Bank. Monique Melis will 
stand for election, this being the first Annual General Meeting 
following her appointment in June 2017. Subject to Board 
approval, David Arden, the incoming Chief Financial Officer 
and Company Secretary, will also stand for election at the 
2018 Annual General Meeting. 

Under the Articles of Association, shareholders may remove a 
Director before the end of his term by passing an ordinary 
resolution at a general meeting. 

53

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsAUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

Attendance of the Audit Committee
As at 31 December 2017, the Audit Committee comprised the 
following independent Non-Executive Directors:

Members

Meetings attended 2017

Stuart Bernau (Chairman) 

Gene Lockhart

Keith Carby

Sir Michael Snyder

  Attended 

  Unable to attend

Stuart Bernau 
Chairman of the Audit Committee

Chit Ghee Yeoh 
Director of Internal Audit

Focused on building  
and delivering an audit  
plan that supports the  
Bank’s growth model

2017 in brief

Internal audit reports reviewed by 
the Committee

31

Percentage of the Bank’s financial 
reporting reviewed by the 
Committee

100% 

Related Parties contract review 

Oversight of IFRS 9 accounting 
judgements

Letter from the Chairman
I am pleased to present the Audit Committee report for the 
year ended 31 December 2017.

In its first full year as a listed company, Metro Bank has continued 
to grow strongly as it follows its unique business model. 

As such, the Audit Committee has focused on building and 
delivering an audit plan that works alongside the growth 
model and looks forwards as well as backwards to ensure 
it fulfils its assurance role and understands, assesses and 
monitors the risk facing the business. 

It has been a busy year for the Audit Committee. The 
Committee has spent a significant amount of time reviewing 
and considering the progress of the Bank’s project to 
transition to IFRS 9 and the accounting judgements which 
underpin this. The Committee reviewed and recommended 
quarterly, half yearly and annual financial statements and 
shareholder announcements for approval by the Board.

It has also monitored the delivery of the 2017 Internal Audit Plan 
and the outcomes of the work performed and the reports issued, 
ensuring recommendations for improvement are actioned 
where appropriate. In developing the Internal Audit Plan for 
2018, we have ensured inclusion of those areas which bear the 
greatest risk to the Bank, those which are most impacted by 
continued growth and areas of regulatory focus. We have also 
supported the continued expansion of the Internal Audit team 
to meet the increased workload and we are satisfied it has 
sufficient resource to fulfil its responsibilities.

The 2018 Internal Audit Plan was approved by the Board in 
January 2018 following discussion at the Committee, and 
they also approved the level of risk assurance contained 
within the Plan. I am therefore comfortable that the key risks 
to Metro Bank’s unique business model have been identified 
and are being monitored.

The Committee has reviewed and considered the contracts for 
services with InterArch Inc, (‘InterArch’), a related party of the 
Bank to provide assurance to the Board, that the contracts for 
services continue to be at arm’s length and on terms which are 
at least as favourable as those which could be obtained in the 
market. This included a review carried out by an independent 
third party, the details of which can be found below.

54

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
During the year, the Financial Reporting Council’s Audit 
Quality Review team reviewed PwC’s audit of the Group’s 
2016 financial statements, as part of their annual inspection of 
audit firms. As Chair of the Audit Committee, I held an initial 
preparatory discussion with the review team, received a copy 
of the concluding letter issued in November 2017 by the FRC, 
and then discussed the results of the review with our audit 
partner at PwC. These were also considered by the Audit 
Committee. I am pleased to report that there were no 
significant findings arising.

The Bank’s external auditor has been in situ since 2009. In line 
with regulatory requirements, the Bank will commence an 
external audit tender process in 2018 for completion by 2019. 
The Audit Committee will oversee this process and make a 
recommendation to the Board on the most suitable firm. 

In October 2017, the Financial Reporting Council’s Conduct 
Committee wrote to the Bank requesting further information 
on certain judgements and disclosures made in preparing our 
Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 December 
2016, given this was our first year of reporting as a listed 
company. The Bank and the Committee welcomed the 
feedback from the Financial Reporting Council, especially 
given the first year of reporting as a listed group and the 
publication of its accounts. The Bank provided responses in 
consultation with the Audit Committee and the external 
auditors. The Committee is satisfied that the enhancements 
proposed to, and agreed with, the FRC, have been 
appropriately incorporated in the 2017 Annual Report.

As part of my role as Chairman of the Audit Committee, 
I meet at least once a month with the Director of Internal 
Audit and regularly with her team. I sit on the Risk Oversight 
Committee and work closely with Gene Lockhart, Chairman 
of that Committee. I also meet monthly with the Chief Risk 
Officer to discuss issues in her Board report. I have regular 
meetings with the Chief Financial Officer and senior 
members of his team to discuss the financial statements 
and with the Deputy Company Secretary who acts as 
Secretary to the Committee. I have also informed 
management that I am available to meet with the 
Company’s shareholders on request.

The Audit Committee met eight times in 2017 and, following 
each meeting, I provided a verbal update to the Board on key 
issues and, where necessary, outlined the actions being taken 
by management to address any issues raised. The minutes are 
also included in the next Board pack. Before each Audit 
Committee meeting I also meet with the external audit 
partner and the Committee members have a session with the 
external auditors at the end of each meeting without the 
presence of management.

I attended regular seminars run by professional services firms 
on current key issues and, where appropriate, arranged for 
presentations to the Audit Committee and the Board. 
Looking forward to 2018, we expect this to be another busy 
and exciting year for Metro Bank. We will ensure that the Audit 
Committee keeps pace with the challenges presented by the 
successful implementation of Metro Bank’s business model 
and provide the level of assurance required by the Board.

Stuart Bernau
Audit Committee Chairman
1 March 2018

The Audit Committee in brief
The Audit Committee’s key role is to review the integrity of 
the financial reporting for the Bank and to oversee the 
effectiveness of the internal control systems and the work 
of the internal and external auditors.

External audit
•  Recommend the appointment, reappointment or removal
•  Oversee the relationship, approve terms of engagement 

and review independence and objectivity

•  Approve remuneration and review the supply of non-audit 

services in line with policy

•  Meet regularly without management present
•  Ensure the audit contract is tendered at least every ten years

Internal audit
•  Approve appointment or termination of the Director of 

Internal Audit

•  Monitor and review the effectiveness of the function
•  Review and approve the Internal Audit Charter
•  Review and assess the Internal Audit Plan and ensure that 

resources are adequate

•  Meet regularly with the Director of Internal Audit and ensure 

access to Board

•  Review management’s responsiveness to findings

Financial and narrative reporting
•  Monitor the integrity of the financial statements
•  Review and report to the Board on significant financial 

issues and material judgements

•  Review and challenge accounting policies, methods used 
to account for significant and unusual transactions, clarity 
and completeness of disclosure

•  Advise whether the Annual Report is fair, balanced and 

understandable

Whistleblowing and fraud
•  Review the adequacy and security of whistleblowing 

arrangements

•  Review the procedures for detecting fraud and 

preventing bribery

Internal controls and risk management
•  Monitor and review the adequacy and effectiveness of 

the Company’s internal financial controls and risk 
management systems

•  Review and approve the statements in the Annual Report 

concerning internal controls and risk management

Full details can be found on our website: 
metrobankonline.co.uk.

Composition of the Audit Committee
The four members of the Audit Committee are all 
independent Non-Executive Directors and bring a range of 
relevant business experience. For further details of their skills 
and experience, please refer to their biographies on pages 44 
and 45. At least one of the members of the Committee has 
recent and relevant financial experience and the Committee 
as a whole has competence in the banking sector.

Regular attendees at the Audit Committee include the CEO, 
CFO, CRO, Director of Internal Audit, Group Finance Director, 
Financial Controller, Deputy Company Secretary and 
representatives from the external auditors, PwC.

55

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsAUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT CONTINUED

Key areas discussed at Audit Committee meetings since  
1 January 2017

Area

Policy

Key topics

•  Share Dealing Policy

•  Modern Slavery Policy

•  Fraud Policy

Financial 
reporting 

•  Review of Terms of Reference and 

recommendation to Board for approval

•  Review of Q1 results

•  2017 half-year results, including an update of 
critical accounting judgements and estimates

•  Review of Q3 results

•  2017 full-year results, Annual Report and 

Accounts, including assessment of the key 
judgements and estimates, going concern and 
viability report

•  Review of 2017 external auditors’ reports and 

findings

•  Tax strategy

•  FRC Conduct Committee corporate reporting 

letter and Metro Bank response

•  IFRS 9 Key Accounting Judgements

Internal 
Audit

•  Review of internal audits carried out in 2017

•  Review and approval of the Internal Audit 

Charter

•  Finalisation of the 2016 independent external 

review of the Internal Audit function

•  Review of the 2017 Internal Audit Reports

•  Approval of the 2018 Internal Audit Plan and 

resourcing

External 
Audit

•  2016 external auditors’ report and full-year 

findings

•  2017 External Audit Plan, engagement terms 

and fees

•  Terms of engagement for the half-year review 

•  External auditors’ half-year review findings 

•  External auditors’ regulatory updates

•  PwC Audit Quality Review findings and 

responses

•  2017 full-year external auditors’ report and 

findings 

Related 
party review

•  Related party review

•  InterArch Inc. presentation

•  Independent review of InterArch Inc. 

architecture and design services and marketing 
contracts

Regulatory  •  Regulatory and accounting update

•  IFRS 9 implementation progress updates

In addition to the key areas opposite, the Committee reviewed 
the progress against the Internal Audit Plan and reviewed the 
detailed reports where appropriate. At each meeting, we also 
receive an update on horizon scanning for future regulatory 
changes which may affect the Bank.

Related parties
Architectural design services and branding, and marketing 
and advertising services are provided to the Bank by InterArch 
Inc. (‘InterArch’) a firm owned by Shirley Hill, wife of Vernon 
W. Hill, II, Non-Executive Chairman.

In order to ensure that the contracts for services with 
InterArch are materially consistent with those that could be 
obtained from an independent third party, the contractual 
arrangements are subject to periodic review by the Audit 
Committee, using benchmarking reviews conducted by 
independent third parties. The Committee has also 
considered the disclosures that the Bank has made regarding 
the relationship with InterArch to ensure they are appropriate 
and in line with relevant reporting standards.

In 2017, the Committee discussed the benchmarking reviews 
conducted by independent third parties and evaluated the 
Bank’s response to the feedback and recommendations 
which were reported. The Committee also received a 
presentation from the InterArch team on the work undertaken 
by them over the term of the contracts. Following 
consideration of these reports, we continue to believe that 
contracts for services with InterArch are at arm’s length and 
are at least as beneficial as those which could be obtained in 
the market from an alternative supplier, and that the quality 
and effectiveness of the service provided by InterArch to the 
Bank remains excellent. Following the review, the Executive 
Leadership Team are implementing improved controls in 
respect of continuous monitoring of the contracts.

A new contract for branding, marketing and advertising was 
signed in January 2018. The contract for architectural design 
services has recently been renegotiated and the Committee 
has taken steps to ensure that it continues to be at arm’s 
length as part of the renegotiation process.

Fair, balanced and understandable
In line with the Code, we considered whether the 2017 
Annual Report is “fair, balanced and understandable and 
should provide the information necessary for shareholders 
to assess the Group’s position, performance, business model 
and strategy”. The Committee is satisfied that the 2017 Annual 
Report meets this requirement and, in particular, that 
appropriate disclosure has been included for both positive 
and negative developments in the year. The process 
supporting this goal included:
•  The compilation of the 2017 Annual Report and Accounts 

was managed by the Chief Financial Officer together with a 
cross-functional team of senior managers

•  Input is provided by a cross-functional team from Finance, 
Risk, People, Legal, Investor Relations and business lines
•  A formal review is undertaken by the Audit Committee of 
the draft 2017 Annual Report and Accounts, along with a 
review of any issues raised in the external auditors’ report, 
in advance of final sign-off

•  A final review is performed by the Board of Directors

56

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  The Company confirms that it has complied with the 
provisions of the Competition and Markets Authority’s Order 
for the financial year under review.

Non-audit services
The Bank and PwC have safeguards in place to protect the 
independence and objectivity of the external auditor. 

The Bank has a policy for the provision of non-audit services 
by the external auditor. In line with the policy, all non-audit 
services provided to the Bank by the external auditor, where 
the fee is expected to exceed a de minimis limit, must be 
pre-approved by the Audit Committee subject to the 
guidelines and thresholds detailed in the policy. Pre-approval 
by the Committee must be obtained in advance of any work 
being carried out. Pre-approval must be performed by the 
Committee, it cannot be delegated to a member of 
management. The Committee must be provided with a 
detailed explanation of each particular service to be provided 
to allow them to make an appropriate assessment of the 
impact of the service on the external auditor’s independence. 
The policy further formalises within the Bank the restriction 
on the provision of non-audit services by the external 
auditor which the FRC consider to be prohibited. In 
accordance with the FRC’s Ethical Standard, the services 
considered prohibited include: 
•  Certain tax and valuation services, consultancy and 

advisory services 

•  Services that involve playing any part in the management 

or decision-making of the Bank

•  The design and implementation of internal control or 

risk management procedures related to the preparation 
or control of financial information, or the design 
and implementation of financial information 
technology systems

•  Services linked to the financing, capital structure and 

investment strategy of the Bank (except where assurance 
over financial information, such as in the form of comfort 
letters is required)
•  Certain legal services
•  Bookkeeping and preparing accounting records and 

financial statements

•  Payroll services and certain human resources services
•  Services related to the Bank’s internal audit function

No significant engagements for non-audit services were 
carried out by the external auditor during the year. Details of 
the fees paid to the external auditor during the year can be 
found in note 7 on page 98. 

Internal Audit
The Group’s Internal Audit function plays a key role in 
providing independent assessment and challenging 
governance, risk and control. The Audit Committee approved 
the Internal Audit Plan and considered the results of its work. 
We also:
•  Approved the Internal Audit Charter, which sets out the role 

and expectations of Internal Audit

•  Monitored the objectivity and competence of the 

Internal Audit function, and the adequacy of Internal 
Audit resources

•  Monitored the delivery of the Internal Audit Plan

The Committee was satisfied that Internal Audit had adequate 
resources available this year.

System of internal control and risk management
Details of the Bank’s risk management framework are 
provided on pages 30 to 37. In considering the effectiveness 
of internal controls, the Audit Committee received and 
discussed reports from Internal Audit and the external 
auditors. In addition, executive management was invited to 
discuss the more significant issues raised by Internal Audit. 
Management action plans to resolve the issues raised are 
monitored by the Audit Committee.

Recommendations for improvements to internal controls by 
the external auditors are monitored by Internal Audit, with 
progress reported to the Audit Committee.

External audit
The Audit Committee reviews and makes recommendations 
to the Board with regard to the appointment of external 
auditors, their remuneration and terms of engagement.

The Audit Committee is also responsible for the oversight of 
the relationship with PwC and the effectiveness of the audit 
process. To satisfy ourselves of the effectiveness of the 
external audit, during the year we:
•  Carried out a review of the 2016 external audit process
•  Reviewed the proposed Audit Plan in advance of the 

annual audit

•  Reviewed and approved the audit engagement terms and 

proposed audit fee

•  Reviewed the FRC’s Audit Quality Inspection Report (‘AQR’) 

on PwC published in June 2017

•  Reviewed the results of the AQR inspection as noted above;
•  Considered the continued independence and objectivity 

of PwC

•  Reviewed and discussed the reports provided by PwC

At the end of each Audit Committee meetings, members met 
the external auditors without management present, to discuss 
any relevant issues. 

PwC has been the Group’s auditors since the inception of the 
Bank in 2009.

In accordance with the requirements of the Statutory Auditors 
and Third Country Auditors Regulations 2016, the Committee 
will carry out a tender process for the external audit in 2018, 
for completion by 2019. In conducting the tender process, 
the Committee will adhere to the FRC’s guidance on audit 
retendering and the provisions of the UK Corporate 
Governance Code 2016.

57

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements 
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT CONTINUED

Significant financial reporting areas considered by the Audit Committee in 2017
In respect of financial reporting, the Audit Committee considered the key judgements and estimates in relation to the 
2017 Annual Report and Accounts.

Key judgements and estimates in financial reporting

Audit Committee review and conclusions

Impairment of loans and advances
Determining the appropriateness of loan loss provision is 
inherently judgemental and requires management to make 
a number of assumptions.

Individual impairment losses on secured loans and advances 
are calculated based on an individual valuation of the 
underlying asset. Collective impairment losses on loans 
and advances are calculated using a statistical model.

Deferred tax asset
The Bank recognises a material deferred tax asset in respect 
of unutilised past operating losses. The recoverability of 
the deferred tax asset (‘DTA’) requires consideration of the 
expected future levels of taxable profit in the Group.

The Committee received and challenged reports from 
management explaining the approach taken to provisioning 
and the resulting changes in the provision levels during 
the period.

The Committee considered key assumptions used in the 
collective model, being probability of default, the probability 
of this default resulting in possession and/or write-off, and the 
subsequent loss incurred.

The Committee is satisfied that the approach taken and 
judgements applied were reasonable.

The Committee also specifically considered the key 
accounting judgments and disclosures for the transition 
to IFRS 9 and is satisfied that they are reasonable.

The Committee considered the recognition of the DTA, in 
particular the seven-year financial plan including the timing 
over which future taxable profits are expected to be available 
for the deferred tax asset to be realised.

The Committee noted that Metro Bank has generated a full 
year of profit in 2017 and, based on the business plans and 
evidence provided, agrees with the management judgement 
that sufficient taxable profits are expected to be available to 
utilise the tax losses carried forward in full and therefore the 
entire asset is considered to be recoverable.

Income recognition 
The Bank recognises interest on customer loans using the 
effective interest rate method. Under this method, fees and 
interest should be spread over the expected life of each 
instrument to create an even interest rate.

The Committee reviewed reporting which explained that the 
expected lives of financial instruments are reviewed at least 
annually. Lives are determined on a portfolio basis based on 
observed historic payment practices.

The bank does not offer products with any interest-free teaser 
periods. Fees recognised within interest primarily include 
loan arrangement fees and upfront costs of new lending 
(for example, broker commissions and valuation fees).

The Committee is satisfied that management has undertaken 
an appropriate review, and the judgements applied are 
reasonable.

Judgement is required to estimate the expected lives of our 
loan portfolios.

58

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  RISK OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE REPORT

Attendance of the Risk Oversight Committee
As at 31 December 2017, the Risk Oversight Committee 
comprised the following independent Non-Executive 
Directors:

Members

Meetings attended 2017

Gene Lockhart (Chairman) 

Stuart Bernau 

Ben Gunn

Sir Michael Snyder

  Attended 

  Unable to attend

Gene Lockhart 
Chairman of the Risk Oversight 
Committee

Aileen Gillan 
Chief Risk Officer (‘CRO’)

Letter from the Chairman
I am pleased to present this report of the Risk Oversight 
Committee (‘ROC’).

The Bank continues 
to grow in a safe and 
sustainable manner

2017 in brief

Policies approved or recommended 
to the Board

18

Oversight of the IFRS 9 Expected 
Credit Loss models

12

Retail mortgage AIRB models 
reviewed as part of the Bank’s 
AIRB application

7

Oversight of the ICAAP and 
ILAAP preparation

The ROC continues to focus on overseeing risk and advising 
the Board, as appropriate, on the risk arising to the Bank from 
its continuing business activities and future risk strategy.

2017 has been a busy and successful year for Metro Bank, 
which has continued to grow in a safe and sustainable 
manner. We entered our first full year of profitability, 
continued to surprise and delight our customers and create 
FANS, which led to growth in low-cost sticky deposits, and 
increased our lending book at low-risk. During the year, we 
acquired a c. £600 million buy-to-let mortgage portfolio, 
successfully completed a £278 million capital raise in July, 
prepared for the introduction of IFRS 9 and have been 
preparing for an advanced internal ratings based (‘AIRB’) 
approach to calculating credit risk capital requirements. 
Application to adopt the AIRB approach for residential 
mortgages has now been submitted. 

There are many regulatory changes on the horizon, including 
ring-fenced banking legislation and the Minimum 
Requirement on Own Funds and Eligible Liabilities (‘MREL’). 
The Committee reviews and provides an opinion on the 
Executive Leadership Team’s plans to implement and apply 
these regulations.

During the year, we reviewed a range of policies, documents 
and transactions, and discharged other advisory and oversight 
responsibilities. I provide a verbal update to the Board and the 
ROC minutes are included in the next Board pack.

ROC members and other colleagues met the PRA on a 
number of occasions during the year, including a review 
of our treasury and liquidity management, which was 
received positively.

The following sections explain the role and activities of the 
ROC, and how it has discharged these responsibilities, as well 
as setting out several key areas of activity during 2017.

Gene Lockhart
Risk Oversight Committee Chairman
1 March 2018

59

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
RISK OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE REPORT CONTINUED

The Risk Oversight Committee in brief
The ROC is a sub-Committee of the Board. Its specific 
responsibilities are set out in its Terms of Reference.

Accountable to the Board, the ROC provides leadership, 
oversight and direction regarding the Bank’s risk governance 
and management. We are charged with helping the Board to 
create an appropriate culture across the Bank, which 
emphasises and demonstrates the benefits of a risk-based 
approach to risk management and internal controls. We are 
responsible for reviewing, challenging and recommending to 
the Board the Bank’s risk appetite, Individual Capital Adequacy 
Assessment Process (‘ICAAP’) document, Individual Liquidity 
Adequacy Assessment (‘ILAAP’) document and risk policies. 
We also provide oversight of the credit risk model 
programme. The ROC oversees risk management procedures 
and reviews risk reports on key business areas. In addition, we 
advise the Audit Committee on reviews of effectiveness of the 
Bank’s risk controls, and the Nomination and Remuneration 
Committees on risk weightings to be applied to the 
remuneration calculations for the Executive Leadership Team.

The ROC receives regular Management Information (‘MI’) 
and reports concerning the Bank’s performance against risk 
appetite and the measures set by it and by the Board. We 
receive regular updates on regulatory developments, and 
consider how these will affect plans, processes, systems 
and controls.

The Committee reviews and formally notes the minutes of the 
Executive Risk Committee (‘ERC’) and the Asset and Liability 
Committee (‘ALCO’).

As a key part of the Bank’s governance framework, the 
ROC ensures that the CRO has unfettered access to it and 
its Chairman.

At each scheduled meeting the ROC considered the following 
standing items:

•  CRO ROC Report
This includes an executive summary from the CRO setting out 
items of note and assessing the Bank’s performance against 
its risk appetite and risk metrics. It also includes specific 
reports on the following areas:

•  Credit risk
Execution of our strategy requires prudent and controlled 
management of credit risk. To support this, one of the roles of 
the ROC is to oversee credit underwriting and ensure that the 
Bank has effective processes and controls to monitor and 
manage credit risk, including where the risk position 
associated with a particular customer or loan has 
deteriorated. This ensures that lending remains within risk 
appetite and monitors policy exceptions.

•  Operational risk
We receive reports concerning risk and control self-
assessments, information security, business continuity 
management and incidents. While a number of incidents 
were raised during 2017, our view is that the management of 
these incidents and the actions taken in response was 
proportionate and appropriate to the size and scale of the 
incidents. We also note that post-incident reviews were held 
for material incidents to capture learnings and ways to prevent 
or mitigate any potential recurrences. We continued to focus 
on cyber risk during 2017, in response to the increased 
prevalence of attempted attacks against financial services 
firms and others.

•  Compliance and conduct risk
In a constantly changing regulatory environment, the ROC is 
updated regularly on developments and regulatory changes 
that could impact the Bank. We receive updates on 
compliance and conduct risk in the areas of culture and 
governance, product governance, customer treatment and 
voice of the customer. We are also updated on how the Bank 
manages expressions of dissatisfaction, and on the ongoing 
compliance assurance work performed by the second line.

•  Financial crime risk
Given the level of risk posed by financial crime to all banks, 
our report includes management information on matters 
including: performance against the Bank’s financial crime key 
risk indicators; compliance with customer identification and 
verification requirements for all new accounts; oversight; and 
risk assessment and high risk customers. Our report also 
covers payments and customer screening, as well as updates 
on items of note from the Financial Crime Steering Group.

•  Treasury
While the primary venue for in-depth discussions on Treasury 
is ALCO, the Treasurer’s commentary is tabled at each ROC 
meeting – and the Treasurer is invited to attend meetings to 
discuss this. The ROC also reviews Treasury policies and notes 
the minutes of ALCO. Our report includes high-level MI on 
liquidity and interest rate risk, while we also receive specific 
reports on Treasury risk. In addition, the Treasurer’s report 
includes updates on relevant regulatory matters.

•  Litigation update
We note the report from the Bank’s Legal team regarding any 
material litigation cases.

•  Deep dives and in-depth reviews
We receive in-depth reviews on areas of emerging risk and 
regulatory interest throughout the year. Topics covered during 
2017 included information security, impairment methodology 
and IFRS 9, and the performance of acquired mortgage 
portfolios, including the portfolio acquired in June 2017.

60

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Area

Topics 

Regulatory 

•  IFRS 9 Implementation Programme

•  Minimum Requirement on Own Funds 

and Eligible Liabilities (‘MREL’) 

•  Ring-Fenced Banking Legislation

•  Bank of England Base Rate Change and 

Impacts Plan

•  Money Laundering Reporting Officer 

(‘MLRO’) Annual Report

AIRB 
application 

•  Advanced Internal Ratings Based approach 
to calculating credit risk (‘AIRB’) application

•  Credit Risk Model Framework

•  Credit Risk Model Policy

•  Credit Risk Model Design Principles 

•  Retail Mortgage IRB Models 

Treasury 
Governance 
Project 

•  Risk Committee Terms of Reference 

reviewed and recommended to Board for 
approval 

•  ALCO Terms of Reference for noting 

•  Review and approval of Treasury Dealing 

Policy

•  2018 Investment Strategy for noting

Capital and 
Liquidity 

•  ILAAP document incorporating Treasury 
Policy and Contingency Funding Plan

•  ICAAP document including Interest Rate 

Risk in the Banking book

Deep dives 

•  Deep dive on cyber crime and information 

security 

•  Deep dive on impairment methodology

Composition of the Risk Oversight Committee
All four members held office throughout 2017. All other 
Non-Executive Directors may attend ROC meetings. The 
CFO, CRO and CEO have standing invitations to attend as 
guests, unless the Chairman of the Committee asks them to 
excuse themselves from a particular meeting or discussion.

Other Directors and colleagues attend as guests by invitation 
of the Chairman to present and report on relevant topics, 
with the Deputy Company Secretary acting as Secretary to 
the Committee.

The ROC’s Terms of Reference are reviewed annually and are 
available on our website.

Key areas considered by the Risk Oversight Committee 
in 2017
During 2017, we received items of business including 
the following:

Area

Policy 

Topics 

Policies approved by ROC:
•  Commercial Lending Policy

•  Arrears Management Policy

•  Residential Mortgage Lending Policy

•  Sanctions Policy

•  Data Policy 

•  Business Continuity Policy 

•  Impairment Policy 

•  Market Risk Policy 

•  Retail Unsecured Finance Policy 

•  Private Banking Policy 

•  Diversity and Inclusion Policy 

•  Health and Safety Policy

Policies reviewed and recommended to 
the Board: 
•  Credit Risk Policy 

•  Responsible Lending Policy 

•  Compliance Policy 

•  Anti-Money Laundering/Counter Terrorism 

Financing Policy 

•  Treating Customers Fairly Policy

•  Liquidity Policy 

61

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsNOMINATION COMMITTEE REPORT

Attendance at the Nomination Committee
As at 31 December 2017, the Nomination Committee 
comprised the following independent Non-Executive 
Directors and also the Chairman, Vernon W. Hill, II:

Members

Meetings attended 2017

Lord Flight (Chairman)

Vernon W. Hill, II

Keith Carby

Roger Farah

  Attended 

  Unable to attend

Lord Flight 
Chairman of the Nomination 
Committee

Danielle Harmer 
Chief People Officer

Letter from the Chairman
I am pleased to share my report of the Nomination 
Committee for 2017.

During the year, we focused on succession planning and met 
a number of Non-Executive Director candidates. As a result, 
we oversaw the appointment of a new Non-Executive 
Director, Monique Melis, and also a new Chief Financial 
Officer, David Arden.

Monique brings with her significant experience in financial 
services, regulation and compliance. She was introduced as 
a suitable candidate by one of the existing members of the 
Board. We followed a rigorous process for her appointment 
which included interviews with the Chairman and several 
Board members, alongside detailed referencing and due 
diligence. Following this, we made a recommendation for her 
appointment to the Board, and we are delighted to welcome 
her to the team.

David, a seasoned CFO, joins the Company in March 2018 
when Mike Brierley retires. Mike is one of the two founding 
Metro Bank Executive Directors. We will be sorry to see him 
leave and wish him well for the future. The search firm 
Alderbrooke Group, itself a customer of Metro Bank, helped 
us identify and recruit our new CFO, and we are looking 
forward to David joining us.

We continue to identify Non-Executive Director candidates in 
our quest to progressively strengthen and refresh the Board.

The Nomination  
Committee is focused  
on identifying new talent  
for the Board

2017 in brief

Non-Executive Directors considered 
to be independent.

100%

Average tenure of Non-Executive 
Directors in years.

5.7

Non-Executive Director 
appointments during the year

1

62

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Board composition, independence and time commitments
We reviewed the skills, experience, independence and 
knowledge of the Board during 2017. This process helps us 
understand which areas we may want to focus on when 
recruiting future Board members, as well as the likely future 
composition of our Board.

The Committee is satisfied that all of the Non-Executive 
Directors remain independent and free of relationships and 
other circumstances that could affect their judgement and 
ability to offer robust challenge while providing the support 
that also forms part of their role.

The Board carried out an externally facilitated evaluation 
during 2017. More details on this can be found in the 
Corporate Governance Statement on page 52.

Diversity
We understand the merits of a diverse organisation and Board 
– and one of our top priorities is to use diverse long lists in 
order to identify candidates for Board roles. We have retained 
the services of Audeliss, a search firm, to support us in 
sourcing candidates for Non-Executive Director roles in the 
future. Diversity is central to Audeliss’s approach and we are 
delighted to be working with them. Audeliss has no 
connection to Metro Bank.

We do not have any specific targets in relation to Board 
diversity and any appointments are made on merit as we seek 
individuals who will add significant value. However, we are 
committed to building a strong Board which is diverse in 
many ways, including gender.

Lord Flight
Nomination Committee Chairman
1 March 2018

The Nomination Committee in brief
The Nomination Committee leads the process for identifying 
and making nomination recommendations to the Board. Its 
duties include:
•  Regularly reviewing the structure, size and composition 

(including skills, knowledge, independence, experience and 
diversity) of the Board, and making recommendations to 
the Board as required.

•  Considering succession planning for Directors and other 
senior executives, taking into account the challenges and 
opportunities facing the Company, and the skills and 
expertise needed on the Board in the future.

•  Taking responsibility for identifying and nominating 

candidates to fill Board vacancies as and when they arise, 
for the approval of the Board.

•  Considering Board candidates on merit and against 

objective criteria and with due regard for the benefits of 
diversity, taking care that appointees have time available to 
devote to the position.

•  Reviewing the results of the Board performance evaluation 

process relating to the Board composition.

Full details can be found on our website: 
metrobankonline.co.uk.

Composition of the Nomination Committee
In addition to the members set out on page 62 Craig 
Donaldson (CEO) attends meetings by invitation while the 
Chief People Officer, Danielle Harmer, acts as the Secretary 
to the Committee and provides support to the Committee 
Chairman and the Committee as needed.

Following each meeting the Chairman provided a verbal 
update to the Board. The Committee minutes are also 
included in future Board papers.

Key areas discussed at Nomination Committee in 2017

Area

Discussion

Board 
composition and 
succession

•  The composition and diversity of 

Board membership

•  Board tenure and independence

•  The appointment of a new Chief 

Financial Officer

•  The appointment of a new Non-

Executive Director

•  The Board succession plan and the 

skills and experience of the Board as a 
group

•  Review of proposed Non-Executive 

Director candidates

•  2017 Hampton-Alexander data/report

63

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsREMUNERATION COMMITTEE REPORT

Attendance at Remuneration Committee
As at 31 December 2017, the members of the Committee 
were all independent Non-Executive Directors:

Members

Meetings attended 2017*

Lord Flight (Chairman)

Keith Carby

Roger Farah

  Attended 

  Unable to attend

* 2 meetings in February 2017

Lord Flight 
Chairman of the Remuneration 
Committee

Danielle Harmer 
Chief People Officer

Our simple and consistent approach to 
remuneration for all colleagues aligns them to our 
unique customer-focused model and the growth 
and success of Metro Bank

2017 in brief

Colleagues who think Metro Bank is 
a good place to work.

96%

Company multiplier for variable 
reward, see page 68.

92%

New roles created during the year.

596

Colleagues promoted.

644

Letter from the Chairman
On behalf of the Board, and as Chairman of the 
Remuneration Committee, I am pleased to present the 
Remuneration Committee Report and the Directors’ 
Remuneration Report (‘the Report’) for the year ended 
31 December 2017.

Our first shareholder-approved Directors’ Remuneration 
Policy was approved at the Annual General Meeting (‘AGM’) in 
April 2017, and is intended to apply until April 2020. We have 
included a summary of the Policy within our Remuneration 
Report for ease of reference. Full details of the approved 
Policy can be found on our website.

We are committed to providing transparency on decision-
making in respect of performance and reward outcomes.  
To that end, and acknowledging the feedback received on  
last year’s Report, we have enhanced the level of disclosure 
this year.

Our approach to remuneration across Metro Bank
We believe oversight of the remuneration and benefits across 
the Bank are an important part of our role. Specifically, this 
year we have advised the Company on the transfer of the 
Group Personal Pension Plan to a new provider, supported by 
the advisers Gallagher, as well as on the launch of ShareBuy 
– an all employee Share Incentive Plan (‘SIP’).

As a Committee, we also have oversight of both reward and 
how the Company is developing and improving its approach 
to remuneration and benefits for all employees.

64

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Our approach to remuneration for Executive Directors is 
consistent with that for all employees. It comprises of a salary, 
reasonable benefits and pension provisions and variable 
reward which is delivered primarily through share options.

The variable reward element is based on personal behaviours 
and delivery and also achievement of Bank goals for the 
financial year. Any awards are subject to deferral over up to 
five years. All share options are awarded at the market share 
price with no discount. This aligns all colleagues with both 
investors and other stakeholders in line with our customer-
focused growth model.

We do not operate additional Long-Term Incentive Plans 
(‘LTIPs’) as we take a simple approach which rewards all 
colleagues for creating FANS. We are committed to making 
everyone an owner, through the delivery of share options 
across the Company. This aligns colleagues, including our 
executive directors, with our long-term vision and the 
customer experience.

All variable reward is subject to malus and clawback (apart 
from the relatively small proportion of cash paid after the end 
of the relevant financial year).

Gender pay
This year we have examined the Gender Pay Gap and data for 
the Company.

Median  
pay gap

13.5%

Mean 
pay gap

22.4%

Median 
bonus gap

Mean  
bonus gap

24%

38.7%

23.5%

27.1%

Median 
bonus gap 
excluding 
share options 
sales/gains

Mean 
bonus gap 
excluding 
share options 
sales/gains

The Bank has a Median Gender Pay Gap of 13.5% and a Mean 
Gender Pay Gap of 22.4% – and has carried out significant 
analysis to establish what is driving the gap and to understand 
what interventions might redress the imbalance. The bank has 
also examined the salaries for all roles across the bank with 
more than ten colleagues. This confirmed that there is no 

Pay quartiles
LOWER 

LOWER MIDDLE

Male 
Female 
Median pay gap 
Mean pay gap 

50%
50%
1.1%
0.1%

52%
Male 
Female 
48%
Median pay gap  0.0%
0.2%
Mean pay gap 

UPPER MIDDLE

UPPER

50%
Male 
Female 
50%
Median pay gap  -0.5%
0.2%
Mean pay gap 

70%
Male 
Female 
30%
Median pay gap  11.8%
11.5%
Mean pay gap 

65

equal pay issue and that we pay colleagues doing the same 
roles equitably, regardless of gender.

Proportion of female and male colleagues by pay quartile
In 2017 68.6% of females received a bonus, versus 65.1% of 
males. The Mean Bonus Gap is 38.7% and the Median Bonus 
Gap is 24%. However, if gains made on the sale of share 
options or shares are excluded, the Mean Bonus Gap reduces 
to 27.1% and the Median to 23.5%.

31.4%

68.6%

34.9%

65.1%

Female

Male

Received bonus

Did not receive bonus

As the primary cause of the Gender Pay Gap and Bonus Gap 
at Metro Bank is the under representation of women in senior 
roles, we are focused on encouraging and supporting 
talented women into leadership and specialist jobs.

Further details can be found on our website 
metrobankonline.co.uk

Looking back on 2017
Variable reward
Variable reward outcomes for 2017 were based on key 
financial, risk, customer, people and culture objectives 
balanced with the personal behaviours, contribution and 
delivery of individual Executive Directors. Again, this is the 
same approach that we take with all colleagues in Metro Bank 
and specifically the same company multiplier for all 
colleagues who are eligible for variable reward.

In light of strong performance in the year we are proposing 
total variable reward of 123% of salary, out of the maximum 
200% allowed within our Remuneration Policy, for the CEO; 
and total variable reward of 108% of the same maximum for 
the CFO, in respect of the 2017 financial year. Page 68 details 
the scorecard measures, targets and outcomes relating to 
2017 as well as the total variable reward to be awarded.

Looking forward to 2018
Salaries from 1 April 2018
We have a “standard” pay pot of 2.25% for inflationary and 
behaviour/performance-related salary increases across the 
Company. There is an additional pay pot for those roles which 
we deem are growing rapidly in scale, complexity and 
criticality and also for those colleagues which market data 
suggests are below the lower end of a market-competitive 
pay range. The proposed range of increases for these 
colleagues in 2018 is 2.5% to 30.18%.

We are very mindful of the current mood and sentiment 
surrounding executive pay. However, we do not believe it 
appropriate for executive salaries to remain static when the 
Bank, and therefore our Executive Director roles, are also 
growing at a significant rate, bringing additional responsibility 
and complexity.

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsREMUNERATION COMMITTEE REPORT CONTINUED

Craig Donaldson, CEO, did not receive a salary increase in 
2017. We carried out a review of Craig’s remuneration 
arrangements, taking into consideration his performance in 
the role since our listing in March 2016 and the increase in the 
scale of our operations during that time. The outcome of the 
review was that we considered it appropriate to increase 
Craig’s salary by 15% from £650,000 to £750,000 p.a. from 
1 April 2018. We intend to keep Executive Director salaries 
under review, following the increase in April 2018.

The proposed salary increase for Craig Donaldson compares 
with the typical rate of increase to be awarded to employees 
across the Company in our key growth roles. For growth and 
market data realignment increases, the average pay rise is 
5.75% and the maximum is 30.18%. 1,786, or 56% of 
colleagues, are due to receive a salary increase above the 
standard inflationary and behaviour/performance related 
pay rises.

Mike Brierley, CFO, is retiring in March 2018 and his salary 
remains unchanged at £375,000. We are awarding him 
variable remuneration for the 2017 performance year. We 
have agreed, in line with our Directors’ Remuneration Policy, 
that Mike’s share options will continue on the same terms and 
vest at the normal time. Mike will not receive any variable 
remuneration for the portion of 2018 during which he 
remains in role. 

Our new CFO, David Arden, joins in March 2018 and his salary 
will be £400,000 p.a. All other elements of remuneration will 
be in line with those currently offered to other Executive 
Directors, in accordance with the Remuneration Policy 
approved by shareholders.

Chairman’s fees
The annual fees for the Chairman, Vernon W. Hill, II, will 
remain unchanged at £385,000. The £120,000 gross annual 
allowance, paid in monthly instalments via PAYE as a 
contribution towards the Chairman’s travel to/from the UK 
and accommodation and subsistence while here, will also 
remain unchanged.

Non-Executive Director (‘NED’) fees
The basic annual fee paid to all NEDs will increase from 
£45,000 to £52,500 from 1 April 2018, again reflecting the 
increasing scope and scale of their roles in a growing 
organisation. The basic fee for NEDs was last increased in 
April 2016.

Variable reward for 2018
The Committee will again agree appropriate and demanding 
annual variable reward targets for the year ended 
31 December 2018, based on financial, risk, customer, people 
and culture objectives. We will disclose targets and measures 
in the Remuneration section of the Annual Report for 2018. 
This disclosure will include information relating to 
performance against those targets except where we believe it 
is commercially sensitive – in which case it will be disclosed 
once it is deemed not to be sensitive.

The majority of variable pay for Executive Directors will 
continue to be awarded as share options deferred over up 
to five years.

We believe that this approach to variable reward focuses 
Executive Leaders on growth and the long-term and 
sustainable success of the business. All employees remain 
eligible to be included in our share schemes as part of our 
ethos to give colleagues meaningful equity ownership.

Appropriateness of executive remuneration
We believe that the overall remuneration structure continues 
to be appropriate. There is significant alignment between the 
interests of Executive Directors and shareholders, and we take 
the same approach with all employees as part of our ethos to 
make every colleague feel like an owner.

We will of course keep the Remuneration Policy under 
review to ensure that our structures remain effective, 
competitive and aligned with the Company’s objectives. 
At the same time, we will remain mindful of the external and 
regulatory environment and evolving debate on executive 
remuneration. Any changes to the Policy will be subject to 
shareholder approval.

As Chairman of the Remuneration Committee I engage 
with relevant organisations concerning our approach 
to remuneration.

On behalf of the Committee, thank you for your continued 
support and please do contact me with any comments or 
questions you may have.

Lord Flight
Remuneration Committee Chairman
1 March 2018

66

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  The Remuneration Committee in brief
Our primary objective is to design a remuneration 
framework that promotes the growth and long-term success 
of Metro Bank and which supports the unique culture and 
values to deliver outstanding customer service.

This framework promotes sound and effective risk 
management and does not encourage risk-taking that 
exceeds the level of risk tolerated and agreed by the Board.

In line with our business strategy and objectives, the 
framework strongly emphasises long-term growth and share 
options as the major source of reward – so that everyone is 
focused and rewarded for long-term, sustainable success.

Because of the way we measure behaviours and 
performance for individuals – and how we capture and 
act upon customer insight across the organisation – the 
framework is also actively aligned to the delivery of 
outstanding customer service.

In addition, our approach rewards success and is attractive to 
talented individuals. In particular, it strikes a balance between 
short-term rewards while also recognising the long-term 
performance of the business. The framework also complies 
with the FCA remuneration principles. Full details can be 
found on our website: metrobankonline.co.uk.

Composition of the Remuneration Committee
In addition to the members set out on page 64 Craig 
Donaldson (CEO) and Vernon W. Hill, II (Chairman) attend 
meetings by invitation and assist the Committee in its 
deliberations – although not in relation to their own 
remuneration. The Committee also receives assistance from 
the Chief People Officer, Danielle Harmer, who acts as the 
Secretary to the Committee.

Following each meeting, the Chairman provides a verbal 
update to the Board. The Committee minutes are also 
included in future Board papers. Areas of discussion are 
outlined below.

Key areas discussed at Remuneration Committee in 2017

Area

Policy

Topics

•  Approval of Directors’ Remuneration 

Report, including letter from 
Remuneration Committee Chairman 
and Remuneration Policy

•  Approach to reporting 2017 Gender 

Pay data

•  Process for sign off of remuneration for 

Director of Audit

Remuneration

•  Salaries for Executive Directors and 

members of the Executive Leadership 
Team

•  Fees for Chairman and Non-Executive 

Directors

Reward 
regulation

•  Regulation guidelines on remuneration 

and proportionality

•  Remuneration Code Annual Disclosure 

for 2017

•  Ex-post checks for October and 

November 2017 share option vests

Awards

•  2017 pay and variable reward quantum and 

multipliers

•  Share options – number available for 
granting, dilution policy, approval of 
exchange value and VWAP to apply to the 
2017 grant

•  2017 Annual Reward Review – outcomes 
(for 2016 performance year) and CEO 
summary

•  CRO sign off of 2017 Reward Review

Pension

•  Pension provider decision and update  

on transfer

Other

•  Proxy Advisor feedback on 2016 Annual 

Report

•  Discretionary decisions regarding vesting 
of share options for “good” leavers/death  
in service colleague

67

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsREMUNERATION COMMITTEE REPORT CONTINUED

Remuneration at a glance

Key strategic highlights during 2017

•  Customer accounts increased from 915,000 

to 1,217,000

•  Deposits increased from £8.0 billion to £11.7 billion
•  Underlying profit before tax increased from a loss 

of £11.7 million to a profit of £20.8 million

•  Statutory profit before tax increased from a loss 

of £17.2 million to a profit of £18.7 million

Balanced scorecard remuneration outcome or 
Company performance multiplier

Financial – see detail below (1)

Risk

Customer

People and culture

Total

Weighting

30%

20%

35%

15%

100%

(1) Financial measures used for variable reward

Financial performance measure

Deposit performance

Lending performance

Capital adequacy (capped at 100%)

Customer accounts

Profitability

Weighted 
performance

30%

18%

29%

15%

92%

% of target 
achieved

104%

102%

100%

100%

95%

2017 remuneration outcomes for our Executive Directors

Craig Donaldson – CEO

£’000 

£1,519  Actual remuneration

£719

£650

£719

£1,300

£719

Fixed

On-target

Maximum

 Fixed

 Variable pay

Total shareholder return

200

180

160

140

120

100

80

March 16 June 16 Sept 16 Dec 16 March 17 June 17

Sept 17 Dec 17

Metro

FTSE 250

FTSE 100

FTSE 350 Banks

How variable reward is calculated across the Bank for all 
colleagues including the Executive Directors

92%

Individual
behaviours 
and
delivery
multiplier

Financial 
performance
30%

Risk Management
18%

Customer 
outcomes
29%

People and culture
15%

Mike Brierley – CFO

£’000 

£814  Actual remuneration

£414

Fixed

 Fixed

 Variable pay

£369 

£414

On-target

£738

£414

Maximum

Notes
1  These illustrations are based on salaries as at April 2017 and consider the cash amount of annual variable remuneration before conversion into Share Awards as described 

on page 69. No account is taken of the effect of share price changes or dividends on the value received from Share Awards or shares received under them.

68

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Directors’ Remuneration Policy in brief
The table below sets out the key features of our Remuneration Policy, and how the Policy will be implemented in 2018. The 
Policy was approved by shareholders at our 2017 Annual General Meeting. Full details of the approved Policy can be found on 
the Company website.

Key elements of remuneration

Key features of the Policy

Implementation for 2018

Salary

•  Reviewed annually and increases will normally 
be in line with increases awarded to other 
colleagues.

•  There may be instances where a higher 
amount is agreed at the discretion of the 
Remuneration Committee, where the size and 
scope of a particular role is increasing as the 
organisation grows.

•  Craig Donaldson CEO: £750,000

•  Mike Brierley CFO: £375,000  

(until March 2018)

•  David Arden CFO: £400,000  

(from March 2018)

Benefits

•  Core benefits include:

•  Benefits will be provided in line with the 

 – Life Assurance of 4x salary;

approved policy.

Pension

Variable remuneration

 – Private Medical Insurance for the Executive 

Director, their partner and children.

•  Additional benefits may be provided in certain 

circumstances such as on relocation.

•  Income Protection is in place for the two 
current Executive Directors as a legacy 
scheme.

•  Executive Directors will be eligible to 

participate in any all-employee Share Incentive 
Plan (‘SIP’).

•  Executive Directors are automatically enrolled 
into our Group Personal Pension Plan (‘GPPP’) 
when they join the Bank. If they have 
exceeded the Life Time Allowance or the 
annual pension tax-free contribution limit, they 
may elect to take cash in lieu of pension for all 
or some of the benefit.

•  The maximum employer contribution 
(including cash in lieu) is 10% of salary.

•  Discretionary variable reward scheme in which 
all eligible colleagues participate, based on 
behaviours and performance over the year, 
paid in the form of cash and share awards for 
all colleagues.

•  For Executive Directors at least 50% is deferred 
into long-term share awards, normally in the 
form of share options, and a further 25% is 
deferred into one year vesting share awards; 
again normally share options. The remaining 
25% is paid as cash.

•  Total variable remuneration, including the fair 
value of share Awards, for each Executive 
Director for any year will not exceed 200% of 
their base pay at the time of award.

•  The variable reward pool for any year is based 
on the overall performance of the Bank in 
terms of culture and delivery in line with the 
balanced scorecard.

•  Malus and clawback apply to all deferred 

variable remuneration.

69

Company contributions; 

•  Craig Donaldson: 10% of salary

•  Mike Brierley: 10% of salary (until March 2018)

•  David Arden: 10% of salary (from March 2018)

•  The total variable reward opportunity, 

expressed as a percentage of salary, will be 
100% for on-target performance, and 200% at 
maximum performance.

•  The weightings of the performance measures 
that will make up the balanced scorecard for 
2018 will be as follows:

 – Financial 30%

 – Risk 20%

 – Customer 35%

 – People and culture 15%

•  Mike Brierley is retiring in March 2018 and will 
be awarded variable remuneration in line with 
our policy which will vest over five years.

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsREMUNERATION COMMITTEE REPORT CONTINUED

Key elements of remuneration

Key features of the Policy

Implementation for 2018

Non-Executive Directors

•  Our NEDs will be paid in line with the  

approved policy

•  The basic annual fee paid to all NEDs will 
increase from £45,000 to £52,500, from  
1 April 2018

•  The annual fees for the Chairman will remain 

unchanged at £385,000

•  All Non-Executive Directors receive a basic 
annual fee for fulfilling their duties as a 
Board member.

•  Additional fees are paid for added 

responsibilities such as chairmanship and 
membership of Committees, or acting as the 
Senior Independent Director.

•  The basic and additional fees are reviewed 
periodically, drawing on external market 
information for comparable financial services 
groups and companies.

•  The Chairman receives a monthly allowance, 
in addition to fees, as a contribution towards 
travel to and from the US and towards living 
expenses while he is in the UK. This is currently 
£10,000 per month before any deductions.

ANNUAL REPORT ON REMUNERATION

This section sets out how the Remuneration Policy for our Executive and Non-Executive Directors was implemented during 
the financial year ending 31 December 2017, and how it will be implemented in 2018. This section will, together with the annual 
statement by the Chairman of the Remuneration Committee, be put to shareholders as an advisory vote at the 2018 AGM to be 
held on 24 April 2018.

Single total figure of remuneration – Executive Directors (audited)
Annual remuneration (£)
The following sets out the remuneration for all the Executive Directors who served during 2017.

Salary
Taxable benefits*
Variable pay, including deferred element†
Pension benefits§
Other*1

Total remuneration

Craig Donaldson 

Mike Brierley 

2017

2016

2017

2016

£650,000
£1,067
£800,000
£65,000
£2,826

£571,250
£1,072
£672,750
£57,125
£2,722

£368,750
£1,067
£400,000
£36,875
£7,214

£1,518,893

£1,304,919

£813,906

£297,500
£8,709
£315,000
£29,750
£5,226

£656,185

Notes:
*  Taxable benefits include Private Medical Insurance for the CEO and CFO.
† 
75% of the total variable pay awarded is converted into share options – see page 73. Any share options awarded are included in this figure, they are not in addition to it.
§  Pension contributions for the Executive Directors may be paid into a Group Personal Pension Plan or paid as a cash in lieu of pension allowance. Both have opted out of 

the pension scheme as they have reached the Life Time Allowance and receive a cash allowance of 10% of salary.

*1  This is made up of non-taxable benefits provided to the Executive Directors and includes life assurance, Group Income Protection and an annual health check.

Details of the single figure
Salary

Craig Donaldson

Mike Brierley

Salary as at 
1 January 
2017

Salary as at 
1 April 
2017

Total salary 
paid in 
2017

650,000

650,000

650,000

350,000

375,000

368,750

70

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC   
ANNUAL REPORT ON REMUNERATION CONTINUED

2017 variable reward outcomes
Amounts shown reflect the total awards under the variable reward scheme to be paid in 2018, based on performance in the 
financial year ending 31 December 2017, including the value of any deferred element.

As set out in the Remuneration policy approved by shareholders at the 2017 AGM, the Executive Directors’ variable rewards in 
relation to performance during 2017 were based on a balanced scorecard of performance measures and objectives, weighted 
for both Executive Directors between Financial, (30%), Risk (20%), Customer (35%) and People and culture (15%).

In addition, a multiplier based on individual behaviours and performance is also applied to the balanced scorecard 
remuneration outcome. The tables below illustrate performance against each of the balanced scorecard measures. 

As set out on page 68, this approach and multiplier are consistent with that applied for all colleagues across the Bank.

Financial performance

Performance measure

Deposit performance
Lending performance
Capital adequacy*
Customer accounts
Profitability

Total for financial measures

*  Capital Adequacy capped at 100%.
**  Rounded to nearest 1%

Non-financial Company objectives

Performance 
vs target

Weighting

Weighted
performance**

104%
102%
100%
100%
95%

5%
5%
5%
5%
10%

30%

5%
5%
5%
5%
9%

30%

Objectives 

Key achievements in 2017

Risk

Customer

Key measures relating to 
Internal Audit, credit quality – 
arrears* and AML

Key measures relating to call 
centre service, customer 
complaints, magic shopping 
and Net Promoter Score 

People and culture Key measures relating 
to voluntary attrition**, 
compliance training and being  
a “good place to work” 

*   Credit quality for arrears was capped at 100% 
**   Voluntary attrition was capped at 100%

Credit quality is exceptional at 185% of target and 
has been capped at 100%. We have had a strong 
year on audit with the majority of our audits 
having very minor or no issues. Our anti-money 
laundering controls have operated effectively.

With our customer focused model, we set 
demanding goals in this area. Our Net Promoter 
score for new accounts was over 80% for 2017. 
The Company Mystery Shopping programme 
has measured customer satisfaction at 84% 
and we responded to 94% of complaints within 
target timescales.

In our annual colleague survey 96% of people 
agreed that Metro Bank is a good place to work. 
Voluntary attrition has improved during the year 
and we consistently see our people doing their 
regulatory training on time.

Overall Balanced Scorecard remuneration outcome or Company performance multiplier

Financial

Risk

Customer

People and culture

Total

2017

Weighting

Weighted 
performance 

20%

18%

35%

29%

15%

15%

Weighting

Weighted 
performance

30%

20%

35%

15%

100%

30%

18%

29%

15%

92%

Based on the assessment of performance against the balanced scorecard outcomes outlined above, we are applying a 
Company performance weighting of 92% for 2017. This weighting will be applied for all eligible colleagues across the Bank, not 
only the Executive Directors.

71

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsANNUAL REPORT ON REMUNERATION CONTINUED

Individual behaviours and performance multiplier
A discretionary multiplier of between 100% and 200% is applied to variable reward for all eligible colleagues, by reference to 
each colleague’s individual behaviours and performance for the year. Below, we set out details of the individual multipliers in 
respect of our Executive Directors for 2017.

Individual 
behaviours and 
performance 
multiplier

Executive Director

Key achievements in 2017

Craig Donaldson Craig has led the Company into its first full year of profitability with another successful

134%

year of exceptional growth and delivery.

The Company has continued to invest in its physical, people and digital capabilities and in 
2017 opened a further 7 stores, created a further 600 jobs and launched a new mobile app, 
ensuring customers receive further choice about how, when and where they want to bank 
with Metro Bank.

He was recognised as the most People Focused CEO by HR Magazine, as the International 
Retail Banker of the Year by Retail Banker International and also as one of the highest rated 
CEOs on Glassdoor, evidencing the fantastic leadership he provides to colleagues and 
the Company.

Mike Brierley

The Company continues to deliver against its financial targets, under Mike’s leadership,  
while remaining within risk appetite. 

118%

Metro Bank has achieved profitability during another year of exceptional investment in 
growth and customer experience. 

Capital, costs and revenue are well managed to deliver short, medium and long term goals. 
Asset and liability management remain conservative. 

The financial control environment remains strong as attested by both internal and external 
review. In addition the Finance, Treasury, Legal and Company Secretarial, Procurement and 
Investor Relations teams that Mike is accountable for deliver high levels of service to their 
internal customers and external stakeholders.

Calculation of variable pay for the Executive Directors
As set out in the 2016 Directors’ Remuneration Report, each Director was eligible for an on-target variable reward opportunity 
of 100% of salary in respect of the financial year ending 31 December 2017.

In line with the above and our approach for all colleagues, the proposed variable rewards for the Executive Directors have been 
calculated as follows.

Executive Director

Craig Donaldson

Mike Brierley

*  Total salary for the year

“On-target” 
variable reward

£650,000

 £368,750*

Company 
performance 
multiplier

Individual behaviours 
and performance 
multiplier

Total variable reward

 X  92%

 X  92%

X  134%

=  £800,000

X  118%

=  £400,000

How variable reward is paid
In line with the Policy approved by shareholders at the 2017 AGM, at least 50% of all variable reward must be deferred into 
long-term share awards, and a further 25% is deferred into one-year vesting share awards. The remaining 25% is paid in cash.

Share awards in respect of the year ending 31 December 2017 will be deferred into market price share options, the fair value of 
which will be informed by the Black-Scholes methodology.

72

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Market price share options are implicitly performance related, and put at risk the deferred element of variable reward  
that would otherwise be delivered in cash, as they will not accrue any value unless Metro Bank’s share price increases over  
the deferral period. Our approach to deferring into market price share options is operated for all colleagues – it supports  
our reward principle to make everyone an owner, and aligns all colleagues with the Bank’s long-term vision.

Executive Director

Total 2017  
variable reward

Element of variable reward

Quantum

Method of delivery* † §

Craig Donaldson

£800,000

Cash (25%)

£200,000

One-year share awards (25%)

£200,000

Long-term share awards (50%) £400,000

Mike Brierley

£400,000

Cash (25%)

£100,000

One-year share awards (25%)

£100,000

Long-term share awards (50%) £200,000

Paid immediately in cash. In line with the 
approved policy, this cash can be converted 
into immediate vesting share options at 
market price via the Company Bonus 
Exchange scheme at a current proposed 
exchange price of £10, i.e. 20,000 share 
options.

20,000 one-year options vesting fully on the 
first anniversary of grant

40,000 five-year options with the first vest on 
the anniversary of grant and in equal annual 
instalments thereafter

Paid immediately in cash. In line with the 
approved policy, this cash can be converted 
into immediate vesting share options at 
market price via the Company Bonus 
Exchange scheme at a current proposed 
exchange price of £10, i.e. 10,000 share 
options.

10,000 one-year options vesting fully on the 
first anniversary of grant

20,000 five-year options with the first vest on 
the anniversary of grant and in equal annual 
instalments thereafter

Notes: All share option awards rounded to nearest option and all cash rounded to nearest £5.
†  Any share options awarded will be granted at an option price based on the Volume Weighted Average Share Price (VWAP) for MTRO for 28 March 2018.

Non-Executive Directors’ remuneration
Chairman’s fees
The fees for the Chairman will remain unchanged at £385,000.

Non-Executive Directors’ (‘NED’) fees
The NEDs are paid a basic fee, with further fees payable to reflect Board Committee memberships and chairmanships and/or, 
additional responsibilities such as Senior Independent Director.

Fees are reviewed annually. The fees are benchmarked against financial services and other FTSE 250 companies. 

The basic fee for NEDs will increase from £45,000 for £52,500 from 1 April 2018, to reflect the increasing scope and scale of 
their roles in a growing organisation. The basic fee for NEDs was last increased in April 2016. The revised fees are shown below:

Role

Non-Executive Director – basic fee

Senior Independent Director

Chairman of Audit, Risk or Remuneration Committee

Chairman of Nomination Committee

Member of Audit , Risk or Remuneration Committee

Member of Nomination Committee

Annual fee 
(£’000)

52.5

30.0

20.0

10.0

10.0

5.0

73

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsANNUAL REPORT ON REMUNERATION CONTINUED

The table below shows the actual fees paid to our Chairman and Non-Executive Directors in 2017 and 2016*

Fees
Taxable benefits†

Total

Vernon W. Hill, II

Stuart Bernau

Keith Carby

Roger Farah

2017

2016

2017

2016

2017

2016

2017

2016

£376,667 £285,000
£120,000 £120,000

£85,000
£0

£77,500
£0

£68,750
£0

£60,000
£0

£58,750
£0

£50,625
£0

£496,667 £405,000

£85,000

£77,500

£68,750

£60,000

£58,750

£50,625

Howard Flight

Alastair (Ben) Gunn

Gene Lockhart

Sir Michael Snyder

Monique Melis§

2017

2016

2017

2016

2017

2016

2017

2016

2017

Fees
Taxable benefits†

Total

£78,750
£0

£70,000
£0

£85,000
£0

£77,500
£0

£85,000
£0

£77,500
£0

£65,000
£0

£58,125
£0

£22,500
£0

£78,750

£70,000

£85,000

£77,500

£85,000

£77,500

£65,000

£58,125

£22,500

Notes: 
*  These figures include all fees paid to the Senior Independent Director and to Non-Executive Directors for Board Committee memberships and Committee 

chairmanships.

†  This is a gross allowance which is paid to the Chairman monthly via PAYE as a contribution towards his travel to/from the UK and accommodation and subsistence while 

here. He does not claim any expenses in relation to this.

§  Appointed 21 June 2017

Remuneration for employees below Board level
Our approach to remuneration is consistent for all colleagues including our Executive Directors. The focus is on simplicity, 
rewarding the right behaviours and outcomes for customers and the business, focusing on long-term growth and discouraging 
unnecessary risk-taking.

Our Directors’ Remuneration Policy, as approved by shareholders at the 2017 AGM, was developed by reference to our reward 
principles, which apply to all colleagues:
•  Pay fair salaries and offer strong career and growth opportunities in an AMAZEING culture.
•  Make everyone an owner; aligning them to the Bank’s long-term vision.
•  Reward colleagues based on Metro Bank’s culture and performance and how they behave and deliver; both as part of the 

team and as an individual.

•  Keep reward as simple as possible, with one approach for all.
•  Take a retail approach to variable reward; no excessive cash bonuses or linear incentives which can skew behaviours and 

encourage unnecessary risk-taking.

Summary of the remuneration structure for employees below Board level

Salary

Benefits

Pension

Variable remuneration

•  We have a “normal” 

inflationary and performance 
related pay pot of 2.25%.

•  The quantum of salary 

increases are primarily driven 
by individual behaviours and 
performance.

•  There is an additional pay pot 
for those roles which we 
deem are growing rapidly in 
scale and/or complexity and 
are critical to the business; 
and for those colleagues 
which market data suggests 
are falling behind the market 
rates for their roles below the 
lower end of the market-
competitive pay range when 
compared to other 
companies of a similar size 
and complexity.

•  All colleagues are eligible for 
Private Medical Insurance 
funded at different rates of 
cover depending on their 
level of seniority.

•  The table below shows the 
minimum and maximum 
employer pension 
contributions payable by 
Metro Bank year-on-year.

•  All colleagues, including the 

Executive Directors, receive a 
benefit of death in service life 
cover of four times their base 
salary. This is a Group 
scheme.

•  Pension contributions for all 
roles below the Executive 
Leadership Team were 
increased for 2017, but 
remained unchanged for 
more senior colleagues.

•  The two current Executive 
Directors receive cover for 
income protection. This is a 
legacy scheme and is not 
offered to any other 
employees apart from one 
member of the Executive 
Leadership Team. It would 
not be provided to any new 
Executive Directors including 
David Arden.

74

•  Our approach to variable 
reward for our Executive 
Directors is consistent with 
that which applies across 
the Bank.

•  All employees are eligible 
for share options or an 
equivalent, in line with our 
strong ethos of employee 
buy-in and ownership.

•  A discretionary multiplier of 
between 100% and 200% is 
applied to variable reward for 
all colleagues whose 
behaviours and delivery are 
as expected or better.

•  During 2017 we also 

launched ShareBuy – an all 
employee Share Incentive 
Plan (‘SIP’).

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Pension contributions

Employer contribution as a % of salary

Minimum

Maximum

Minimum

Maximum

Minimum

Maximum

2017

2016

% change

CEO

Executive Directors

Executive Leadership Team

Senior leaders and experts

Managers and specialists

Entry-level roles

10%

10%

10%

8%

7%

6%

10%

10%

10%

10%

8%

6%

10%

10%

10%

7%

6%

5%

10%

10%

10%

10%

8%

6%

0%

0%

0%

14%

17%

20%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

0%

CEO reward vs employee reward
The table below sets out the percentage change between the 2016 and 2017 years in salary and variable reward. 

% change 2016/17*

Employee group

All employees†

CEO

Executive Directors

Executive Leadership Team

Median

Average

FTE salary

12.6%

0%

2.5%

2.4%

Variable 
reward

28.4%

18.9%

21.5%

50.1%

FTE salary

8.1%

0%

2.5%

4.8%

Variable 
reward

20.9%

18.9%

21.5%

43.5%

Notes: 
†  Colleagues included in data
  Due to the significant growth at Metro Bank, data has been calculated using the same colleagues over the two-year period. This only includes colleagues who were 
employed by Metro Bank on or before 1 January 2016 and still employed on or after 31 December 2017. Any colleagues who joined or left the Bank within this period 
have been excluded from the analysis. Salary is taken as at 31 December 2016 and 31 December 2017.

The ratio of CEO salary versus the average salary for all employees at 31 December 2017 was 17.98 (2016: 18.81*)

* 

In the 2016 Annual Report this was reported as 15.63 as it was calculated on a ‘same store basis’ ie only colleagues who were employed by Metro Bank on or before 
1 January 2015 and still employed on or after 31 December 2016. The 2017 ratio and restated 2016 ratio are simply the salary for the CEO versus the average for all 
employees employed at 31 December in each year.

Relative importance of spend on pay
We made no distributions by way of dividend or share buy-back during the relevant year, or made any other significant 
distributions. We therefore consider that at this time there is no information or data which would assist shareholders in 
understanding the relative importance.

Total shareholder return
The chart shows our total shareholder return (‘TSR’) relative to 
the FTSE 250, FTSE 100 and the FTSE 350 banks (which is the 
capitalisation-weighted index of all bank stocks in the FTSE 
100 and FTSE 250). We believe the broad equity market is a 
more relevant reference point rather than financial services 
only, where growth in the comparator group may be limited.

This chart shows the total return to Metro Bank investors 
since our listing on the London Stock Exchange in March 
2016, compared with the total return of an investment made 
in the FTSE 250, FTSE 100 or FTSE 350 over the same period, 
assuming an initial investment of £100.

200

180

160

140

120

100

80

March 16 June 16 Sept 16 Dec 16 March 17 June 17

Sept 17 Dec 17

Metro

FTSE 250

FTSE 100

FTSE 350 Banks

CEO historic remuneration

Total remuneration 
(including Listing awards)

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

Craig Donaldson

 £1,518,893

£1,304,919

£2,661,474

£749,443

£1,294,100

£543,947

Payments to past Directors
There were no payments made to past Directors in 2017.

Payments for loss of office
There were no payments for loss of office made to Directors in 2017.

75

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsANNUAL REPORT ON REMUNERATION CONTINUED

Dilution limits
The rules of the Metro Bank PLC Deferred Variable Reward Plan contain limits on the dilution of capital. These limits are 
monitored to ensure that we do not exceed 10% of the issued share capital in any rolling ten-year period.

Statement of voting at the Annual General Meeting
We will be proposing a resolution to shareholders in respect of the Annual Report on Remuneration at the Annual General 
Meeting to be held on 24 April 2018. 

The table below shows the voting outcomes on the Directors’ Remuneration Policy and annual report on remuneration at the 
last AGM in 2017.

Item

Remuneration policy
2016 remuneration report

For %

For No

Against %

Against No

Votes
withheld

95.43 41,582,506
94.93 41,611,644

4.57 1,989,312
5.07 2,222,119

343,211
81,226

Shareholding
These are the total shareholdings as at 31 December 2017 for each of the Non-Executive Directors and Executive Directors and 
any related connected persons. Outstanding share awards, including share options, are summarised on pages 77 and 78.

There was no movement in any share interests between the end of the year and 21 February 2018.

Director

Vernon W. Hill, II
Craig Donaldson*
Michael Brierley†
Stuart Bernau
Keith Carby
Roger Farah
Lord Flight
Alastair (Ben) Gunn
Gene Lockhart
Monique Melis
Sir Michael Snyder

Total

Number  
of shares

Percentage 
of issued 
share capital

4,804,231
223,342
91,165
53,654
38,320
650,523
27,716
49,864
40,689
700
12,500

5.44%
0.25%
0.10%
0.06%
0.04%
0.74%
0.04%
0.06%
0.04%
0.00%
0.01%

5,992,704

6.78%

This table includes vested shares where the director has beneficial ownership, shares independently acquired in the market and those held by a spouse or civil partner or 
dependent child under the age of 18 years
*  35,495 of Craig Donaldson’s shares which were awarded in connection with the Listing have not yet vested and are conditional in line with the rules of the long term 

deferred variable reward plan.

†  20,516 of Mike Brierley’s shares which were awarded in connection with the Listing have not yet vested and are conditional in line with the rules of the long term deferred 

variable reward plan.

Directors’ shareholdings 
Shareholding Guidelines
Executive Directors are required to build up a holding of shares equivalent to 100% of their annual salary. We will allow any new 
Executive Director a reasonable amount of time to build up their shareholding. This requirement will be included in our 
Remuneration Policy when it is next reviewed.

Outstanding Share Awards (audited)
No dividends or dividend equivalents are payable on any share options or on any unvested share awards held.

The table below shows, for each Executive Director, as at 31 December 2017:
•  the total number of share awards, shares granted or interests in shares granted and the award price, if applicable; and
•  the total number of outstanding share awards.

The table on pages 77 and 78 shows, for each Non-Executive Director, as at 31 December 2017:
•  the total number of share awards, shares granted or interests in shares granted and the award price, if applicable; and
•  the total number of outstanding share awards.

Note – we have not awarded share options to Non-Executive Directors since 2015 (relating to the 2014 performance year).

76

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC   
Total

355,893

55,459

55,459 04/03/16

19,964

223,437

19,964

Vernon W. Hill, II

Scheme name

CSOP2015
CSOP2014
CSOP2013
CSOP2012
CSOP2011

Total

Craig Donaldson

Scheme name

CSOP2017
CSOP2017 Deferred Cash1 yr
CSOP2017 Bonus Exchange
CSOP2016 Pension Exchange
CSOP2015
CSOP2015 Bonus Exchange
CSOP2014
CSOP2014 Bonus Exchange
CSOP2013
CSOP2012
CSOP2011
Listing awards

Share 
options 
granted

33,637
16,819
16,819
4,541
30,000
20,000
130,000
13,077
30,000
50,000
11,000

Mike Brierley

Scheme name

CSOP2017
CSOP2017 Deferred Cash1 yr
CSOP2017 Bonus Exchange
CSOP2015
CSOP2015 Bonus Exchange
CSOP2014
CSOP2013
CSOP2012
CSOP2011
Listing awards

Share 
options 
granted

15,750
7,875
7,875
15,000
12,637
32,500
14,000
10,000
5,000

Share 
options 
granted

Award date

Award price

First 
vesting date

Last 
vesting date

No. of share 
options 
vested

No. of share 
awards 
exercised

15,000 04/11/15
31/10/14
60,000
5,000 11/11/13
31/10/12
2,000
07/10/11
4,000

86,000

£16.00
£13.50
£12.00
£10.00
£9.00

31/10/16 31/10/20
31/10/15
31/10/19
11/11/16 11/11/18
31/10/15
31/10/13
07/10/14
07/10/12

6,000
36,000
3,000
2,000
4,000

51,000

0
0
0
0
0

0

Shares 
awarded

Award date

First vesting 
date

Last vesting 
date

Award price

No. of share 
options 
vested

No. of 
shares 
vested

No. of share 
awards 
exercised

31/03/17 30/04/18 30/04/22
31/03/17 30/04/18 30/04/18
31/03/17
31/03/17
31/03/17
04/03/16 21/03/16 21/03/16
04/11/15
31/10/16 31/10/20
20/03/15 20/03/15 20/03/15
31/10/19
31/10/15
31/10/14
21/03/14 21/03/14 21/03/14
11/11/18
11/11/16
11/11/13
31/10/12
31/10/15
31/10/13
07/10/11 07/10/12 07/10/14

£32.73
£32.73
£32.73
£20.00
£16.00
£14.00
£13.50
£13.00
£12.00
£10.00
£9.00

0
0
16,819
4,541
12,000
20,000
78,000
13,077
18,000
50,000
11,000

Shares 
awarded

Award date

First 
vesting date

Last 
vesting date

Award price

No. of share 
options 
vested

No. of 
shares 
vested

No. of share 
awards 
exercised

31/03/17 30/04/18 30/04/22
31/03/17 30/04/18 30/04/18
31/03/17
31/03/17
31/03/17
31/10/16 31/10/20
04/11/15
20/03/15 20/03/15 20/03/15
31/10/19
31/10/15
31/10/14
11/11/18
11/11/16
11/11/13
31/10/15
31/10/13
31/10/12
07/10/11 07/10/12 07/10/14

£32.73
£32.73
£32.73
£16.00
£14.00
£13.50
£12.00
£10.00
£9.00

0
0
7,875
6,000
12,637
19,500
8,400
10,000
5,000

0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3,333
0

3,333

0
0
0
0
0
3,333
0

3,333

Total

120,637

32,054

32,054 04/03/16

11,538

69,412

11,538

Alastair (Ben) Gunn

Scheme name

CSOP2015
CSOP2014
CSOP2013
CSOP2012
CSOP2011

Total

Share 
options 
granted

Award date

Award price

First 
vesting date

Last 
vesting date

15,000

7,500 04/11/15
31/10/14
5,000 11/11/13
31/10/12
2,000
07/10/11
4,000

33,500

£16.00
£13.50
£12.00
£10.00
£9.00

31/10/16 31/10/20
31/10/19
31/10/15
11/11/16 11/11/18
31/10/15
31/10/13
07/10/14
07/10/12

No. of share 
options 
vested

No. of share 
awards 
exercised

3,000
9,000
3,000
2,000
4,000

21,000

0
0
0
2,000
4,000

6,000

77

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsStuart Bernau

Scheme name

CSOP2015
CSOP2014
CSOP2013
CSOP2012
CSOP2011

Total

Gene Lockhart

Scheme name

CSOP2015
CSOP2014
CSOP2013
CSOP2012
CSOP2011

Total

Lord Flight

Scheme name

CSOP2015
CSOP2014
CSOP2013
CSOP2012
CSOP2011

Total

Keith Carby

Scheme name

CSOP2015
CSOP2014
CSOP2013
CSOP2012
CSOP2011

Total

Roger Farah

Scheme name

CSOP2015

Total

Michael Snyder

Scheme name

CSOP2015

Total

ANNUAL REPORT ON REMUNERATION CONTINUED

Share 
options 
granted

Award date

Award price

First 
vesting date

Last 
vesting date

15,000

7,500 04/11/15
31/10/14
5,000 11/11/13
31/10/12
2,000
07/10/11
4,000

£16.00
£13.50
£12.00
£10.00
£9.00

31/10/16 31/10/20
31/10/15
31/10/19
11/11/16 11/11/18
31/10/15
31/10/13
07/10/14
07/10/12

No. of share 
options 
vested

No. of share 
awards 
exercised

3,000
9,000
3,000
2,000
4,000

21,000

0
0
0
2,000
4,000

6,000

3,000
9,000
3,000
2,000
4,000

21,000

0
0
0
0
0

0

3,000
9,000
3,000
2,000
4,000

21,000

0
0
0
0
0

0

33,500

Share 
options 
granted

33,500

Share 
options 
granted

33,500

Share 
options 
granted

Award date

Award price

First 
vesting date

Last 
vesting date

No. of share 
options 
vested

No. of share 
awards 
exercised

15,000

7,500 04/11/15
31/10/14
5,000 11/11/13
31/10/12
2,000
07/10/11
4,000

£16.00
£13.50
£12.00
£10.00
£9.00

31/10/16 31/10/20
31/10/19
31/10/15
11/11/16 11/11/18
31/10/15
31/10/13
07/10/14
07/10/12

Award date

Award price

First 
vesting date

Last 
vesting date

No. of share 
options 
vested

No. of share 
awards 
exercised

15,000

7,500 04/11/15
31/10/14
5,000 11/11/13
31/10/12
2,000
07/10/11
4,000

£16.00
£13.50
£12.00
£10.00
£9.00

31/10/16 31/10/20
31/10/15
31/10/19
11/11/16 11/11/18
31/10/15
31/10/13
07/10/14
07/10/12

Award date

Award price

First 
vesting date

Last 
vesting date

No. of share 
options 
vested

No. of share 
awards 
exercised

15,000

7,500 04/11/15
31/10/14
5,000 11/11/13
31/10/12
2,000
07/10/11
4,000

£16.00
£13.50
£12.00
£10.00
£9.00

31/10/16 31/10/20
31/10/15
31/10/19
11/11/16 11/11/18
31/10/15
31/10/13
07/10/14
07/10/12

33,500

Share 
options 
granted

Award date

Award price

First 
vesting date

Last 
vesting date

7,500 04/11/15

£16.00

31/10/16 31/10/20

7,500

Share 
Options 
granted

Award date

Award price

First 
vesting date

Last 
vesting date

5,000 04/11/15

£16.00

31/10/16 31/10/20

5,000

3,000
9,000
3,000
2,000
4,000

21,000

0
0
0
0
0

0

No. of share 
options 
vested

No. of share 
awards 
exercised

3,000

3,000

0

0

No. of share 
options 
vested

No. of share 
awards 
exercised

2,000

2,000

0

0

78

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Executive Director Proposed Share Option Awards
The proposed share option awards to be made in 2018 in respect of the 2017 performance year are already included in the 
single figure table for 2017 variable pay in the table above and are as follows*:

Craig 
Donaldson

Mike 
Brierley

20,000
20,000
40,000

10,000
10,000
20,000

80,000

40,000

Vesting period

Immediate*
After one year
After five years

Total

*  This assumes the Director decides to exchange their cash bonus in its entirety for share options.

79

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsINDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT 
TO THE MEMBERS OF METRO BANK PLC

Report on the audit of the financial statements
Opinion
In our opinion, Metro Bank PLC’s consolidated financial statements and Company financial statements (the ‘financial statements’):
•  give a true and fair view of the state of the Group’s and of the Company’s affairs as at 31 December 2017 and of the Group’s profit 

and the Group’s and the Company’s cash flows for the year then ended;

•  have been properly prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European Union and, as regards the Company’s 

financial statements, as applied in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006; and

•  have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 and, as regards the consolidated financial 

statements, Article 4 of the IAS Regulation.

We have audited the financial statements, included within the Annual Report and Accounts (the ‘Annual Report’), which comprise: 
the consolidated and Company balance sheets as at 31 December 2017; the consolidated income statement and statement of 
comprehensive income, the consolidated and Company statements of cash flows, and the consolidated and Company statements 
of changes in equity for the year then ended; and the notes to the financial statements, which include a description of the 
significant accounting policies.

Our opinion is consistent with our reporting to the Audit Committee.

Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (‘ISAs (UK)’) and applicable law. Our 
responsibilities under ISAs (UK) are further described in the Auditors’ responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements section 
of our report. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

Independence
We remained independent of the Group in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial 
statements in the UK, which includes the FRC’s Ethical Standard, as applicable to listed public interest entities, and we have fulfilled 
our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements.

To the best of our knowledge and belief, we declare that non-audit services prohibited by the FRC’s Ethical Standard were not 
provided to the Group or the Company.

Other than those disclosed in note 7 to the financial statements, we have provided no non-audit services to the Group or the 
Company in the period from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2017.

Our audit approach
Overview

Materiality

Audit scope

Key audit
matters

•  Overall Group materiality: £1.9 million (2016: £2.0 million), based on 5% of the average profit or loss 

before tax of the last 5 years.

•  Overall parent materiality: £2.0 million (2016: £2.1 million), based on 5% of the average profit or loss 

before tax of the last 5 years.

•  The Group is composed of three operating entities: Metro Bank PLC, SME Invoice Finance Limited and 

SME Asset Finance Limited, which are referred to in our report as business components.

•  The scope of our audit and the nature, timing and extent of audit procedures performed were 

determined by our risk assessment, the financial significance of business components and other 
qualitative factors (including history of misstatement through fraud or error).

•  We performed audit procedures over business components considered financially significant in the 
context of the Group (full scope audit) or in the context of individual primary statement account 
balances (audit of specific account balances). We performed other procedures including testing entity 
level controls, information technology general controls and analytical review procedures to mitigate the 
risk of material misstatement in the non-financially significant business components.

80

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  The areas of focus for our audit which involved the greatest allocation of our resources and effort were:
•  Impairment of loans to customers (Group and Company)
•  Recognition of revenue on loans to customers (Group and Company)
•  Recognition of the deferred tax asset in respect of trading tax losses (Group and Company) 

These items were discussed with the Audit Committee as part of our audit plan communicated in September 2017 and updated in 
November 2017. These were the key audit matters for discussion at the conclusion of our audit.

The scope of our audit
As part of designing our audit, we determined materiality and assessed the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements. 
In particular, we looked at where the directors made subjective judgements, for example in respect of significant accounting 
estimates that involved making assumptions and considering future events that are inherently uncertain. 

We gained an understanding of the legal and regulatory framework applicable to the Group and the industry in which it operates, 
and considered the risk of acts by the Group which were contrary to applicable laws and regulations, including fraud. We designed 
audit procedures at Group and significant component level to respond to the risk, recognising that the risk of not detecting a 
material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve deliberate 
concealment by, for example, forgery or intentional misrepresentations, or through collusion. We focused on laws and regulations 
that could give rise to a material misstatement in the Group and Company financial statements, including, but not limited to, the 
Companies Act 2006, the Listing Rules, Pensions legislation, UK tax legislation and the Financial Conduct Authority’s and Prudential 
Regulation Authority’s regulations. Our tests included, but were not limited to, review of the financial statement disclosures to 
underlying supporting documentation, review of correspondence with the regulators, review of correspondence with legal 
advisors, enquiries of management, and review of internal audit reports in so far as they related to the financial statements. There 
are inherent limitations in the audit procedures described above and the further removed non-compliance with laws and 
regulations is from the events and transactions reflected in the financial statements, the less likely we would become aware of it.

We found the risk of fraud in revenue recognition related to customer loans to be a key audit matter, and this is discussed further 
below. As in all of our audits we also addressed the risk of management override of internal controls, including testing journals and 
evaluating whether there was evidence of bias by the directors that represented a risk of material misstatement due to fraud. 

Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in the auditors’ professional judgement, were of most significance in the audit of the 
financial statements of the current period and include the most significant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not 
due to fraud) identified by the auditors, including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy; the allocation of 
resources in the audit; and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters, and any comments we make on the 
results of our procedures thereon, were addressed in the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole, and in forming 
our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. This is not a complete list of all risks identified by 
our audit. 

81

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsINDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT 
TO THE MEMBERS OF METRO BANK PLC CONTINUED

Key audit matter

How our audit addressed the key audit matter

Impairment of loans to customers
We focused on this area because management make 
significant judgements over both the timing of recognition of 
impairment provisions and the estimation of the size of any 
such provision.

Management estimate specific impairment provisions on 
individually significant balances, typically corporate loans. A 
collective model based provision is then estimated for all other 
exposures, both retail and corporate, not subject to a specific 
provision. The collective model approach underpins the 
material portion of the Group’s impairment provisions.

We focused our audit on the following areas:
•  The identification of impairment events, which differs 

depending on the type of lending product and customer, 
including how unidentified impairment (customers that have 
had a loss event that has not yet manifested itself in a missed 
payment or other indicator) and any forbearance are taken 
into account.

•  The key assumptions and judgements made by 

management that underlie the calculation of provisions. 
These included the probability of default, the loss given 
default, and for individually assessed loans, the valuation of 
and expected cashflows related to collateral held by 
the Group. 

On 1 January 2018, the Group transitioned to the new financial 
instruments accounting standard IFRS 9, which replaced IAS 
39. The estimated transition impact is disclosed in the notes to 
the financial statements in accordance with IAS 8. The most 
significant change relates to the provisions for impairment. In 
order to meet the requirements of the new standard, 
significant changes have also been made to systems, 
processes and controls with effect from 1 January 2018. 

(Group and Company)

We understood and tested the design and operating effectiveness 
of the controls over data and calculations used in the provisioning 
process. These controls included those over:
•  the identification of which loans and advances were impaired;
•  the transfer of data from source systems to impairment models 

and model output to the general ledger;

•  the governance over the impairment processes; and
•  the calculation of the impairment provisions.

We determined that these controls were designed, implemented 
and operated effectively and therefore we determined that we 
could place reliance on them for the purposes of our audit.

In addition we performed the following substantive procedures:

Specific impairment
For loans identified by management as potentially impaired we 
examined the forecasts of future cash flows prepared by 
management to support the calculation of the impairment, 
critically assessed the underlying assumptions and corroborated 
these to supporting evidence. From the testing performed we 
determined whether the specific impairment provisions made 
were reasonable. We found no material exceptions.

We examined a sample of loans and advances which had not 
been identified by management as potentially impaired and 
formed our own judgement as to whether that was appropriate 
through reviewing information such as the counterparty’s 
payment history and performance of the business during  
the year.

We did not find identify any evidence of an event that had not 
been properly evaluated by management, or that would require 
an impairment review to be performed.

Modelled impairment
We tested the completeness and accuracy of data from 
underlying systems used in the models including the bucketing of 
loans into delinquency bandings. We also critically assessed and 
tested the key underlying assumptions used by management, and 
performed sensitivity analysis.

Based on the evidence obtained we found that the impairment 
model assumptions were reasonable.

In respect of the estimated impact of the adoption of IFRS 9, we 
understood and critically assessed classification and 
measurement decisions and the impairment models developed 
by the Group. This included using our credit modelling specialists 
in our assessment of judgements and assumptions supporting 
the expected credit loss requirements of the standard. We 
re-performed selected model calculations to confirm the model 
outputs and we assessed the reasonableness of forward looking 
information incorporated into the impairment calculations.

Based on the evidence obtained, we found that the 
methodologies and data used within the models were 
appropriate, and that the model assumptions and overlays to 
modelled outputs were reasonable. 

82

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Key audit matter

How our audit addressed the key audit matter

Recognition of revenue on loans to customers
The Group recognises interest income using the effective 
interest rate method which spreads interest and directly 
attributable cash flows, the most significant of which relate to 
loan arrangement fees and upfront costs of new lending, over 
the loans’ expected lives.

The expected life assumptions utilise repayment profiles to 
represent how customers are expected to repay. The Group 
has limited historical experience to support these profiles and 
therefore management must apply judgement, in addition to 
any historical information available.

(Group and Company)

Recognition of deferred tax asset in respect of trading  
tax losses 
The recognition of the deferred tax asset in respect of tax  
losses is permitted only to the extent that there is convincing 
evidence that there will be sufficient taxable profits in the 
future to utilise the tax losses carried forward.

When considering the availability of future taxable profits, 
judgement is required when assessing projections of future 
taxable income, and the business plans and forecasts 
supporting these. 

(Group and Company)

We assessed and tested the design and operating effectiveness  
of the controls directly associated with the calculation and 
reporting of interest income on loans to customers. These 
controls included:
•  accurate input of loan data into core systems;
•  appropriate authorisation of amendments to data; and
•  determination and approval of the assumptions used in the 

effective interest rate calculations.

We determined that these controls were designed, implemented 
and operated effectively and therefore we determined that we 
could place reliance on them for the purposes of our audit.

We assessed management’s effective interest rate calculations 
through stressing the assumptions applied and utilising  
internal benchmarks to evaluate the appropriateness of the  
key assumptions used. We found no material exceptions.

We reviewed the Group’s business plans and forecasts  
and assessed the forecast results by challenging both the 
underlying and economic assumptions, focusing on those 
directly impacting the projections of future taxable income.  
These assumptions included loan and deposit growth, and 
forecast loan performance.

We used our independent benchmarking data to compare  
a number of the economic assumptions to external data  
sources where possible, and also assessed the accuracy of 
previous forecasts.

We reviewed sensitivity analysis performed by management, 
looking at the impact on recovery of the asset under  
varying scenarios.

We performed procedures over the existence of the asset, 
including inspection of correspondence with HMRC and 
substantiating tax losses to corroborating evidence. 

We concluded that management’s judgements in respect  
of the deferred tax asset are supportable in the context of the 
information currently available

How we tailored the audit scope
We tailored the scope of our audit to ensure that we performed enough work to be able to give an opinion on the financial 
statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the Group and the Company, the accounting processes and controls in 
place, and the industry in which they operate.

The Group is composed of three operating entities: Metro Bank PLC, SME Invoice Finance Limited and SME Asset Finance Limited. 
The scope of our audit and the nature, timing and extent of audit procedures performed were determined by our risk assessment 
and other qualitative factors (including history of misstatement through fraud or error). We performed audit procedures over 
business components considered financially significant in the context of the Group (full scope audit) or in the context of individual 
primary statement account balances (audit of specific account balances), using the materiality levels set out above. We also 
performed other audit procedures including testing information technology general controls and controls over key outsourced 
functions related to financial reporting, to mitigate the risk of material misstatement.

83

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsINDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT 
TO THE MEMBERS OF METRO BANK PLC CONTINUED

This approach gave us coverage of over 99% of the Group’s total assets. Audit coverage on account balances in the consolidated 
income statement ranges between 85% and 100%. For the remaining balances within business components which were not individually 
financially significant, the risk of material misstatement was mitigated through audit procedures including testing of entity level controls, 
information technology general controls and group and component level analytical review procedures.

Materiality
The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. We set certain quantitative thresholds for materiality. These, 
together with qualitative considerations, helped us to determine the scope of our audit and the nature, timing and extent of our 
audit procedures on the individual financial statement line items and disclosures and in evaluating the effect of misstatements, both 
individually and in aggregate on the financial statements as a whole. 

Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the financial statements as a whole as follows:

Group financial statements

Company financial statements

Overall materiality

£1.9 million (2016: £2.0 million).

£2.0 million (2016: £2.1 million).

How we determined it

5% of average profit or loss before tax of 
the last 5 years.

5% of average profit or loss before tax of the 
last 5 years.

Rationale for benchmark applied

Based on the benchmarks used in the 
Annual Report, profit or loss before tax is 
a key measure used by the shareholders in 
assessing the performance of the Group, 
and is a generally accepted auditing 
benchmark.

Based on the benchmarks used in the 
Annual Report, profit or loss before tax is 
a key measure used by the shareholders in 
assessing the performance of the company, 
and is a generally accepted auditing 
benchmark.

We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to them misstatements identified during our audit above £92,000 
(Group audit) (2016: £97,000) and £99,000 (Company audit) (2016: £107,000) as well as misstatements below those amounts that, 
in our view, warranted reporting for qualitative reasons.

Going concern
In accordance with ISAs (UK) we report as follows:

Reporting obligation

Outcome

We are required to report if we have anything material to add 
or draw attention to in respect of the directors’ statement in 
the financial statements about whether the directors 
considered it appropriate to adopt the going concern basis  
of accounting in preparing the financial statements and the 
directors’ identification of any material uncertainties to the 
Group’s and the Company’s ability to continue as a going 
concern over a period of at least twelve months from the  
date of approval of the financial statements.

We are required to report if the directors’ statement relating  
to going concern in accordance with Listing Rule 9.8.6R(3)  
is materially inconsistent with our knowledge obtained in  
the audit.

We have nothing material to add or to draw attention to. 
However, because not all future events or conditions can be 
predicted, this statement is not a guarantee as to the Group’s  
and Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

We have nothing to report.

Reporting on other information 
The other information comprises all of the information in the Annual Report other than the financial statements and our auditors’ 
report thereon. The directors are responsible for the other information. Our opinion on the financial statements does not cover the 
other information and, accordingly, we do not express an audit opinion or, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in this 
report, any form of assurance thereon. 

In connection with our audit of the financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider 
whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or 
otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify an apparent material inconsistency or material misstatement, we are 
required to perform procedures to conclude whether there is a material misstatement of the financial statements or a material 
misstatement of the other information. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement 
of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report based on these responsibilities.

With respect to the Strategic Report and Directors’ Report, we also considered whether the disclosures required by the UK 
Companies Act 2006 have been included. 

84

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Based on the responsibilities described above and our work undertaken in the course of the audit, the Companies Act 2006, 
(CA06), ISAs (UK) and the Listing Rules of the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) (“Listing Rules”) require us also to report certain 
opinions and matters as described below (required by ISAs (UK) unless otherwise stated).

Strategic Report and Directors’ Report
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit, the information given in the Strategic Report and Directors’ 
Report for the year ended 31 December 2017 is consistent with the financial statements and has been prepared in accordance with 
applicable legal requirements. 

In light of the knowledge and understanding of the Group and Company and their environment obtained in the course of the audit, 
we did not identify any material misstatements in the Strategic Report and Directors’ Report. (CA06).

The directors’ assessment of the prospects of the Group and of the principal risks that would threaten the solvency or liquidity 
of the Group
We have nothing material to add or draw attention to regarding:
•  The directors’ confirmation on page 47 of the Annual Report that they have carried out a robust assessment of the principal risks 

facing the Group, including those that would threaten its business model, future performance, solvency or liquidity.
•  The disclosures in the Annual Report that describe those risks and explain how they are being managed or mitigated.
•  The directors’ explanation on page 37 of the Annual Report as to how they have assessed the prospects of the Group, over what 
period they have done so and why they consider that period to be appropriate, and their statement as to whether they have a 
reasonable expectation that the Group will be able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they fall due over the period 
of their assessment, including any related disclosures drawing attention to any necessary qualifications or assumptions.

We have nothing to report having performed a review of the directors’ statement that they have carried out a robust assessment of 
the principal risks facing the Group and statement in relation to the longer-term viability of the Group. Our review was substantially 
less in scope than an audit and only consisted of making inquiries and considering the directors’ process supporting their 
statements; checking that the statements are in alignment with the relevant provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code (the 
“Code”); and considering whether the statements are consistent with the knowledge and understanding of the Group and 
Company and their environment obtained in the course of the audit. (Listing Rules)

Other Code Provisions
We have nothing to report in respect of our responsibility to report when: 
•  The statement given by the directors, on page 48, that they consider the Annual Report taken as a whole to be fair, balanced and 
understandable, and provides the information necessary for the members to assess the Group’s and Company’s position and 
performance, business model and strategy is materially inconsistent with our knowledge of the Group and Company obtained in 
the course of performing our audit.

•  The section of the Annual Report on page 56 describing the work of the Audit Committee does not appropriately address matters 

communicated by us to the Audit Committee.

•  The directors’ statement relating to the Company’s compliance with the Code does not properly disclose a departure from a 

relevant provision of the Code specified, under the Listing Rules, for review by the auditors..

Directors’ Remuneration
In our opinion, the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the 
Companies Act 2006. (CA06). 

Responsibilities for the financial statements and the audit
Responsibilities of the directors for the financial statements
As explained more fully in the Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities set out on page 47, the directors are responsible for the 
preparation of the financial statements in accordance with the applicable framework and for being satisfied that they give a true and 
fair view. The directors are also responsible for such internal control as they determine is necessary to enable the preparation of 
financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

In preparing the financial statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the Group’s and the Company’s ability to continue 
as a going concern, disclosing as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting 
unless the directors either intend to liquidate the Group or the Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but 
to do so.

85

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsINDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT 
TO THE MEMBERS OF METRO BANK PLC CONTINUED

Auditors’ responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material 
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditors’ report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance  
is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a  
material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually  
or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of  
these financial statements. 

A further description of our responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is located on the FRC’s website at:  
www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditors’ report.

Use of this report
This report, including the opinions, has been prepared for and only for the parent Company’s members as a body in accordance 
with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act 2006 and for no other purpose. We do not, in giving these opinions, accept or 
assume responsibility for any other purpose or to any other person to whom this report is shown or into whose hands it may come 
save where expressly agreed by our prior consent in writing.

Other required reporting
Companies Act 2006 exception reporting
Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion:
•  we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit; or
•  adequate accounting records have not been kept by the Company, or returns adequate for our audit have not been received from 

branches not visited by us; or

•  certain disclosures of directors’ remuneration specified by law are not made; or
•  the Company financial statements and the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to be audited are not in agreement with 

the accounting records and returns. 

We have no exceptions to report arising from this responsibility. 

Appointment
We were appointed by the directors on 29 July 2009 to audit the financial statements of the Company for the first long accounting 
period ended 31 December 2010 and subsequent financial periods. The period of total uninterrupted engagement is 8.5 years, 
covering the periods ended 31 December 2010 to 31 December 2017.

Darren L Meek (Senior Statutory Auditor)
for and on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants and Statutory Auditors
London
1 March 2018

86

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2017

Interest income
Interest expense

Net interest income
Fee and commission income
Net gains on sale of investment securities
Other income

Total income

Operating expenses
Depreciation and amortisation
Costs associated with listing
Listing Share Awards
Impairment of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets

Total operating expenses
Credit impairment charges

Profit/(loss) before tax

Taxation

Profit/(loss) for the year

Other comprehensive income/(expense) for the year
Items which will be reclassified subsequently to profit or loss where specific 

conditions are met:

Available-for-sale investments (net of tax):
– fair value gains
– fair value gains transferred to the income statement on disposal

Total other comprehensive income/(expense)

Total comprehensive profit/(loss) for the year

Earnings/(loss) per share

Basic (pence)

Diluted (pence)

Year ended
31 December
2017
£’000

Year ended
31 December
2016
£’000

Notes

2

2

3

4

5

11, 12

11, 12

8

28

28

301,946
(60,964)

240,982
29,715
3,692
19,363

293,752

(231,409)
(33,430)
-
(1,376)
(639)

(266,854)
(8,223)

18,675

(7,886)

10,789

2,745
(3,692)

(947)

9,842

12.8

12.6

213,486
(59,246)

154,240
22,189
5,391
13,286

195,106

(179,767)
(22,379)
(1,841)
(3,296)
(315)

(207,598)
(4,706)

(17,198)

445

(16,753)

13,937
(5,391)

8,546

(8,207)

(22.0)

(22.0)

87

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsCONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

AS AT 31 DECEMBER 2017

Assets
Cash and balances with the Bank of England
Loans and advances to banks
Loans and advances to customers
Available-for-sale investment securities
Held to maturity investment securities
Property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Prepayments and accrued income
Deferred tax asset
Other assets

Total assets

Liabilities
Deposits from customers
Deposits from central banks
Repurchase agreements
Other liabilities

Total liabilities

Equity
Called-up share capital
Share premium 
Retained earnings
Other reserves

Total equity

Total equity and liabilities

31 December
2017
£’000

31 December
2016
£’000

Notes

9

10

10

11

12

13

8

14

15

16

16

18

2,111,630
100,388
9,620,326
360,704
3,553,801
327,550
148,231
52,785
53,697
26,243

434,612
65,816
5,865,370
604,127
2,622,588
246,690
92,515
43,000
56,279
26,291

16,355,355

10,057,288

11,668,738
3,320,900
121,558
148,270

7,950,579
543,000
653,091
106,083

15,259,466

9,252,753

–
1,303,503
(219,404)
11,790

–
1,027,645
(230,193)
7,083

1,095,889

804,535

16,355,355

10,057,288

The accounting policies, notes and information on pages 94 to 131 form part of the financial statements.

The financial statements on pages 87 to 131 were approved by the Board of Directors on 1 March 2018 and signed on its behalf by:

Vernon W. Hill, II
Chairman

Craig Donaldson
Chief Executive Officer

Mike Brierley
Chief Financial Officer

88

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2017

Share
capital
£’000

Share
premium
£’000

Retained
earnings
£’000

Available-
for-sale
reserve
£’000

Share
option
reserve
£’000

Total
equity
£’000

1,027,645

(230,193)

(3,472)

10,555

804,535

10,789

–

Balance as at 1 January 2017

Net profit for the year
Other comprehensive expense, net 
of tax, relating to available-for-sale 
investments

Total comprehensive income
Share issue
Cost of share issue
Net share option movements

Balance as at 31 December 2017

Balance as at 1 January 2016

Net loss for the year
Other comprehensive income, net 

of tax, relating to available-for-sale 
investments

Total comprehensive income
Share issue
Cost of share issue
Net share option movements

Balance as at 31 December 2016

–

–

–

–
–
–
–

–

–

–

–

–
–
–
–

–

–

–

–
278,785
(2,927)
–

–

10,789
–
–
–

1,303,503

(219,404)

629,304

(213,440)

–

–

–
403,572
(5,231)
–

(16,753)

–

(16,753)
–
–
–

(947)

(947)
–
–
–

(4,419)

(12,018)

–

8,546

8,546
–
–
–

–

–

–
–
–
5,654

10,789

(947)

9,842
278,785
(2,927)
5,654

16,209

1,095,889

3,329

–

–

–
–
–
7,226

407,175

(16,753)

8,546

(8,207)
403,572
(5,231)
7,226

804,535

1,027,645

(230,193)

(3,472)

10,555

Notes

16

16

18

The available-for-sale reserve represents the unrealised net change in the fair value of available-for-sale investments since 
initial recognition.

89

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsCONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2017

Reconciliation of profit/(loss) before tax to net cash flows from operating 

activities:

Profit/(loss) before tax
Adjustments for:
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets
Impairment and write-offs of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets
Depreciation and amortisation
Share option charge
Gain on sale of securities and fair value gains on derivatives
Accrued interest on and amortisation of investment securities
Changes in operating assets
Changes in operating liabilities

Net cash inflows from operating activities

Cash flows from investing activities
Sales of investment securities
Purchase of investment securities
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets
Purchase and development of intangible assets

Net cash outflows from investing activities

Cash flows from financing activities
Share issue
Cost of share issue

Net cash inflows from financing activities

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at start of year

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

Profit/(loss) before tax includes:
Interest received
Interest paid

Cash and cash equivalents comprise:
Cash and balances with the Bank of England
Loans and advances to banks

Year ended
31 December
2017
£’000

Year ended
31 December
2016
£’000

Notes

11, 12

11

12

16

16

18,675

(17,198)

132
881
33,430
3,160
(3,722)
2,080
(3,755,114)
5,994,389

–
793
22,379
1,873
(5,376)
(4,152)
(2,341,143)
3,511,726

2,293,911

1,168,902

309,335
(997,280)
(99,877)
41
(70,398)

2,196,953
(3,403,039)
(97,828)
4
(45,053)

(858,179)

(1,348,963)

278,785
(2,927)

275,858

1,711,590
500,428

2,212,018

403,572
(5,231)

398,341

218,280
282,148

500,428

296,489
60,833

207,678
(53,246)

2,111,630
100,388

2,212,018

434,612
65,816

500,428

90

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  COMPANY BALANCE SHEET

AS AT 31 DECEMBER 2017

Assets
Cash and balances with the Bank of England
Loans and advances to banks
Loans and advances to customers
Available-for-sale investment securities
Held to maturity investment securities
Property, plant and equipment
Investment in subsidiaries
Intangible assets
Prepayments and accrued income
Deferred tax asset
Other assets

Total assets

Liabilities
Deposits from customers
Deposits from central banks
Repurchase agreements
Other liabilities

Total liabilities

Equity
Called-up share capital
Share premium
Retained earnings*
Other reserves

Total equity

Total equity and liabilities

31 December
2017
£’000

31 December
2016
£’000

Notes

9

12

13

14

15

16

16

18

2,111,630
94,835
9,392,971
360,704
3,553,801
327,535
15,000
141,209
49,970
53,842
240,549

434,612
64,368
5,705,961
604,127
2,622,588
246,663
15,000
87,072
40,398
56,436
169,776

16,342,046

10,047,001

11,668,738
3,320,900
121,558
142,393

7,950,579
543,000
653,091
101,353

15,253,589

9,248,023

–
1,303,503
(226,836)
11,790

–
1,027,645
(235,750)
7,083

1,088,457

798,978

16,342,046

10,047,001

*  The Company profit for the year was £8.9 million (2016: loss of £19.2 million).

The financial statements on pages 87 to 131 were approved by the Board of Directors on 1 March 2018 and signed on its behalf by:

Vernon W. Hill, II
Chairman

Craig Donaldson
Chief Executive Officer

Mike Brierley
Chief Financial Officer

91

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsCOMPANY STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2017

Share
capital
£’000

Share
premium
£’000

Retained
earnings
£’000

Available-
for-sale
reserve
£’000

Share
option
reserve
£’000

Total
equity
£’000

1,027,645

(235,750)

(3,472)

10,555

798,978

8,914

–

Balance as at 1 January 2017

Net profit for the year
Other comprehensive income, net 

of tax, relating to available-for-sale 
investments

Total comprehensive income
Share issue
Cost of share issue
Net share option movements

Balance as at 31 December 2017

Balance as at 1 January 2016

Net loss for the year
Other comprehensive income, net 

of tax, relating to available-for-sale 
investments

Total comprehensive income
Share issue
Cost of share issue
Net share option movements

Balance as at 31 December 2016

–

–

–

–
–
–
–

–

–

–

–

–
–
–
–

–

–

–

–
278,785
(2,927)
–

–

8,914
–
–
–

1,303,503

(226,836)

629,304

(216,594)

–

–

–
403,572
(5,231)
–

(19,156)

–

(19,156)
–
–
–

(947)

(947)
–
–
–

(4,419)

(12,018)

–

8,546

8,546
–
–
–

–

–

–
–
–
5,654

8,914

(947)

7,967
278,785
(2,927)
5,654

16,209

1,088,457

3,329

404,021

–

–

–
–
–
7,226

(19,156)

8,546

(10,610)
403,572
(5,231)
7,226

798,978

1,027,645

(235,750)

(3,472)

10,555

Notes

16

16

18

The available-for-sale reserve represents the unrealised net change in the fair value of available-for-sale investments since 
initial recognition.

92

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  COMPANY CASH FLOW STATEMENT

FOR THE YEAR ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2017

Reconciliation of profit/(loss) before tax to net cash flows from operating 

activities:

Profit/(loss) before tax
Adjustments for:
Loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets
Impairment and write-offs of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets
Depreciation and amortisation
Share option charge
Gain on sale of securities and fair value gains on derivatives
Accrued interest on and amortisation of investment securities
Changes in operating assets
Changes in operating liabilities

Net cash inflows from operating activities

Cash flows from investing activities
Sales of investment securities
Purchase of investment securities
Purchase of property, plant and equipment
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
Purchase and development of intangible assets

Net cash outflows from investing activities

Cash flows from financing activities
Share issue
Cost of share issue

Net cash inflows from financing activities

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at start of year

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

Profit/(loss) before tax includes:
Interest received
Interest paid

Cash and cash equivalents comprise:
Cash and balances with the Bank of England
Loans and advances to banks

Year ended
31 December
2017
£’000

Year ended
31 December
2016
£’000

Notes

16,306

(20,541)

141
882
33,302
3,160
(3,722)
2,080
(3,757,429)
5,993,396

–
794
22,302
1,873
(5,376)
(4,152)
(2,346,135)
3,515,205

2,288,116

1,163,970

309,335
(997,280)
(99,877)
41
(68,708)

2,196,953
(3,403,039)
(97,816)
–
(44,144)

(856,489)

(1,348,046)

278,785
(2,927)

275,858

1,707,485
498,980

2,206,465

403,572
(5,231)

398,341

214,265
284,715

498,980

285,704
60,833

195,157
(53,246)

2,111,630
94,835

2,206,465

434,612
64,368

498,980

12

16

16

93

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsNOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Basis of preparation and significant accounting policies
This section sets out the Group’s (‘our’ or ‘we’) accounting policies which relate to the financial statements as a whole. Where an 
accounting policy relates specifically to a note then the related accounting policy is set out within that note. All policies have been 
consistently applied to all the years presented unless stated otherwise.

1.1 General information
Metro Bank (‘the Company’) together with its subsidiaries (‘the Group’) provides retail and corporate banking services in the UK and 
is a public limited liability company incorporated and domiciled in the United Kingdom under the Companies Act 2006 (Registration 
number 6419578). The address of our registered office is One Southampton Row, London WC1B 5HA.

1.2 Basis of preparation
Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (‘IFRS’) as 
adopted by the EU, the IFRS Interpretations Committee (‘IFRS IC’) and the Companies Act 2006 applicable to companies reporting 
under IFRS.

The financial statements are prepared on a going concern basis, as our Directors are satisfied that the Group and the Company 
have the resources to continue in business for the foreseeable future.

In publishing the Company financial statements here together with the Group financial statements, we have taken advantage of the 
exemption in section 408(3) of the Companies Act 2006 not to present an individual income statement and related notes that form 
a part of these financial statements.

1.3 Cash flow statement
Cash and cash equivalents comprise balances with less than three months’ maturity from the date of acquisition, including cash in 
hand, deposits held at call with banks and balances held with the Bank of England.

The consolidated cash flow statement shows the changes in cash and cash equivalents arising during the year from operating 
activities, investing activities and financing activities.

The cash flows from operating activities are determined by using the indirect method. Net income is therefore adjusted by non-
cash items, such as measurement gains or losses, changes in provisions, impairment of property, plant and equipment and 
intangible assets, as well as changes from receivables and liabilities. In addition, all income and expenses from cash transactions 
that are attributable to investing or financing activities are eliminated. Interest received or paid is classified as operating cash flows.

The cash flows from investing and financing activities are determined by using the direct method.

1.4 Changes in accounting policy and disclosures
At the year end the following standards were in issue but not yet effective and have not been adopted early in these financial 
statements:

(a) IFRS 9 ‘Financial Instruments’
Full details can be found in note 30.

(b) IFRS 16 ‘Leases’
IFRS 16 ‘Leases’ provides guidance on the classification, recognition and measurement of leases to help provide useful information 
to the users of financial statements. IFRS 16 provides a single lessee accounting model, requiring lessees to recognise right of use 
assets and lease liabilities for all applicable leases, with operating leases being brought onto the face of the balance sheet. IFRS 16 
will have a material impact on the amounts recognised in our financial statements. We are currently assessing the impact of IFRS 16, 
and it is not practicable to quantify the effect at the date of the publication of these financial statements. Details of our current lease 
commitments can be found in note 20.

(c) IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from Contracts with Customers’
From 1 January 2018, we adopted IFRS 15 ‘Revenue from Contracts with Customers’. We applied the modified retrospective method 
with the cumulative effect of any adjustments being made directly within retained earnings. The majority of our revenue is net 
interest income which is accounted for under IFRS 9 from 1 January 2018. Accordingly, the majority of our revenues were not 
affected. Management has performed an assessment of the non-interest income revenue streams which are within the scope of 
the new standard. The impact of adopting the standard is immaterial. 

1.5 Segmental reporting
IFRS 8 requires operating segments to be identified on the basis of internal reports and components of the Group which are 
regularly reviewed by the Chief Operating Decision Maker to allocate resources to segments and to assess their performance. For 
this purpose, the Chief Operating Decision Maker of the Group is our Board of Directors.

94

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  1. Basis of preparation and significant accounting policies continued
The Board considers the results of the Group as a whole when assessing the performance of the Group and allocating resources. 
Accordingly, the Group has a single operating segment.

We lend solely within the UK and, as such, no geographical analysis is required. We are not reliant on any single customer.

1.6 Foreign currency translation
(a) Functional and presentation currency
Items included in the financial statements are measured using pounds Sterling, the currency of the UK, which is the primary 
economic environment in which we operate (‘the functional currency’).

The financial statements are presented in pounds Sterling, which is our presentation currency.

(b) Transactions and balances
Transactions in a foreign currency are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates prevailing at the date of 
the transaction.

Monetary items denominated in a foreign currency are translated using the closing rate as at the reporting date. Non-monetary 
items measured at historical cost denominated in a foreign currency are translated with the exchange rate as at the date of initial 
recognition; non-monetary items in a foreign currency that are measured at fair value are translated using the exchange rates at the 
date when the fair value was determined.

Foreign currency differences arising on translation are recognised in other income. Gains and losses arising from foreign currency 
transactions offered to customers are also recognised in other income.

1.7 Critical accounting judgements and estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires management to make judgements, estimates and 
assumptions that affect the application of accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the 
financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Although these estimates are 
based on management’s best assessment of the outcome, actual results may ultimately differ from those estimates. Management 
believes that the underlying assumptions are appropriate and that the financial statements therefore present the financial position 
and results fairly. The areas involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are 
significant to the financial statements, are disclosed below.

(a) Impairment losses on loans and advances
Individual impairment losses on secured loans and advances are calculated based on an individual valuation of the underlying asset 
and other expected cash flows. Collective impairment losses on loans and advances are calculated using a statistical model. The 
key assumptions used in the model are the probability of default; the probability of this default resulting in possession and/or 
write-off; and the subsequent loss incurred. 

The probability of default and the probability of this default resulting in possession and/or write-off are determined based on historic 
default data observed by the bank. This approach is industry standard. The subsequent loss incurred on default is determined using 
the following inputs: the loan balance, the value of collateral held against a loan and any adjustment required to reflect costs of 
recovery, or disposal of the collateral. The key estimate which materially impacts impairment provisions required is considered to be 
the value of collateral:

For mortgage loan receivables, to the extent that:
•  the level of house prices differs by +/- 10%, for example a property value of £100,000 is increased to £110,000 or decreased to 

£90,000, the impairment allowance would be an estimated £1.2 million lower or £1.8 million higher respectively.

For commercial loan receivables, to the extent that:
•   the value of collateral differs by +/- 10%, for example the value of a commercial property on which a loan is secured of £100,000 
is increased to £110,000 or decreased to £90,000, the impairment allowance would be an estimated £0.1 million lower or £0.2 
million higher respectively.

These key assumptions are monitored quarterly to ensure the impairment allowance is reflective of the current portfolio. The 
accuracy of the impairment calculation would therefore be affected by unanticipated changes to the economic situation and 
assumptions which differ from actual outcomes.

95

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements1. Basis of preparation and significant accounting policies continued
(b) Effective interest rate
IAS 39 requires interest earned from loans and advances to customers to be measured at amortised cost using the effective interest 
rate method. Management must therefore use judgement to estimate the expected life of each instrument and the expected cash 
flows relating to it. The accuracy of the effective interest rate may therefore be affected by unexpected market movements, 
resulting in altered customer behaviour and incorrect assumptions:

•  If the estimated life of retail and commercial mortgages were increased or decreased by 10%, the value of such loans on the 

balance sheet would be increased or decreased by £0.5 million.

•  If the estimated life of corporate term loans were increased or reduced by 10%, the value of such assets on the balance sheet 

would be increased or decreased by £0.7 million.

(c) Deferred tax
The largest element of the deferred tax asset represents the future tax impact of carried-forward tax losses which will reduce the 
payment of future tax. This element of the deferred tax asset requires management judgement in assessing its recognition and 
measurement. At 31 December 2017, we recognised a deferred tax asset (net) of £53.7 million (2016: £56.3 million) in respect of tax 
losses carried forward and taxable temporary timing differences. The decrease reflects in main the use of taxable losses against 
taxable profits earned during the year.

Accounting standards permit the recognition of a deferred tax asset to the extent that it is probable, more likely than not, that future 
taxable profits will be available to utilise the tax losses carried forward. This assessment of future taxable profits has been performed 
over management’s current planning horizon and involves estimation uncertainty, principally relating to projections of future taxable 
income based on business plans, and how the timing of that income affects the rate the deferred tax asset is valued at. These 
income projections include assumptions about our future strategy and our ability to deliver expected performance against 
projections for new stores, deposit and loan growth, loan to deposit ratio, interest margins and operating costs.

Our Directors are satisfied based on our progress since launch, the detailed projections which include stress-tested scenarios, and 
the reliability of forecasts used, that sufficient taxable profits will be available to utilise the tax losses carried forward in full, and that 
the measurement of the deferred tax asset is reasonable.

2. Net interest income

Accounting 
policy

We recognise interest income and expense for all interest-bearing financial instruments within ‘interest income’ and 
‘interest expense’ in the income statement using the effective interest rate method.

The effective interest rate method is a method of calculating the amortised cost of a financial asset or a financial 
liability and of allocating the interest income or interest expense over the relevant period. The effective interest rate is 
the rate that exactly discounts estimated future cash payments or receipts through the expected life of the financial 
instrument to the net carrying amount of the financial asset or financial liability. When calculating the effective interest 
rate we estimate cash flows considering all contractual terms of the financial instrument (for example, prepayment 
options) but do not consider future credit losses. The calculation includes all fees paid or received between parties to 
the contract that are an integral part of the effective interest rate, transaction costs and all other premiums or 
discounts.

Once a financial asset or a group of similar financial assets has been written down as a result of an impairment loss, 
interest income is recognised using the original effective interest rate on the net balance.

Interest income

Group

Investment securities
Loans and advances to customers

Total interest income

Interest expense

Group

Interest on customer accounts
Interest on repurchase agreements
Interest on Term Funding Scheme (‘TFS’)
Other

Total interest expense

96

2017 
£’000

56,873
245,073

301,946

2017 
£’000

46,896
1,554
5,437
7,077

60,964

2016 
£’000

46,528
166,958

213,486

2016 
£’000

48,481
4,900
187
5,678

59,246

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED3. Fee and commission income

Accounting 
policy

Fee and commission income is earned from a wide range of services we provide to our FANS and customers. 
We account for fees and commissions as follows:

Product and service Nature, timing and satisfaction of performance obligations and payment terms

Service charges and 
other fee income

We levy a range of standard charges and fees for accountant maintenance or specific account 
services. Where the fee is earned upon the execution of a significant act, for example CHAPs 
payment charges, these are recognised as revenue when the act is completed for the 
customer. Where the income is earned from the provision of services, for example an account 
maintenance fee, this is recognised as revenue when the service is delivered. 

Safe deposit box 
income

Revenue is recognised over the period the customer has access to the box from the date 
possession is taken. Safe deposit box fees are billed on either a monthly or annual basis with 
a standard set price payable dependent on the size of box.

ATM and  
interchange fees

Where we earn fees from our ATMs or from interchange this is recognised at the point the 
service is delivered.

As disclosed in note 1.5, we provide services solely within the UK and therefore revenues are not presented on a 
geographic basis. Revenue is grouped solely by contract-type as we believe this best depicts how the nature, amount, 
timing and uncertainty of our revenue and cash flows are affected by economic factors.

Group

Service charges and other fee income
Safe deposit box income
ATM and interchange fees

Total fee and commission income

4. Other income

Group

Gains on foreign currency transactions
Rental income
Other

Total other income

5. Operating expenses

Group

People costs
Occupancy expense
Information technology costs
Marketing costs
Legal, regulatory and professional fees
Other

Total operating expenses

2017 
£’000

17,864
9,119
2,732

29,715

2017
 £’000

17,445
1,385
533

19,363

2017 
£’000

122,406
30,925
19,863
3,735
7,273
47,207

231,409

2016 
£’000

13,290
7,012
1,887

22,189

2016 
£’000

10,846
631
1,809

13,286

2016 
£’000

93,185
26,082
14,274
3,035
6,122
37,069

179,767

Included within legal, regulatory and professional fees is £590,000 (2016: £790,000) in respect of the Financial Services 
Compensation Scheme (‘FSCS’) levy.

97

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements6. People costs

Accounting 
policy

We operate a defined contribution pension scheme for our colleagues. Contributions to colleagues’ individual 
personal pension plans are made on a contractual basis, with no further payment obligations once the contributions 
have been paid. These contributions are recognised as an expense when they fall due.

Group

Wages and salaries
Social security costs
Other pension costs
Equity-settled share-based payments

Total people costs

2017 
£’000

102,040
10,657
6,534
3,175

122,406

2016 
£’000

77,954
8,304
4,580
2,347

93,185

Share awards were granted to key members of the management team in March 2016 in recognition of their significant contribution 
to the successful private placement and admission of Metro Bank to the London Stock Exchange. The awards are accounted for 
under the requirements of IFRS 2 (‘Share-based Payments’). Under this standard, the expense is recognised from the date when 
there was a shared understanding between parties of the terms of the award to be granted. This was considered to be in March 
2016. 20% of the award vested in March 2016 with a further 16% vesting on 30 April 2017. The remaining 64% will vest annually on 
30 April, 16% each year. The total expense to be recognised in respect of the Listing Share Awards, equal to the fair value of the 
awards, is £6.5 million. This is equal to the market value of shares at the grant date. An expense of £1.4 million was recognised in 
2017 (2016: £3.3 million). This expense is included in the income statement within Listing Share Awards.

The average monthly number of persons employed during the year was 2,831 (2016: 2,129).

Group

Customer-facing
Non-customer-facing

Total number of persons employed

2017 
£’000

1,774
1,057

2,831

2016 
£’000

1,400
729

2,129

Pension costs
Payments were made amounting to £7.1 million (2016: £4.9 million) to employees’ individual personal pension plans during the year.

7. Fees payable to the Group’s auditor
Fees payable to our auditors PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (‘PwC’) are analysed below:

Group

For Metro Bank’s statutory audit
For additional amounts relating to the prior year statutory audit, arising due to the Listing
For the statutory audit of Metro Bank’s subsidiaries
For the reporting accountant services provided in association with the Listing
For tax advisory services
For all other services

Total fees payable to the Group’s auditors

2017 
£’000

1,175
–
37
–
–
79

1,291

2016 
£’000

865
214
37
588
10
60

1,774

98

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED8. Taxation

Accounting 
policy

Current income tax 
Our current income tax comprises the expected tax payable or receivable on the taxable income or loss for the year 
and any adjustment to the tax payable or receivable in respect of previous years. It is measured using tax rates enacted 
or substantively enacted at the reporting date.

Where we have tax losses that can be relieved only by carry-forward against taxable profits of future periods, a 
deductible temporary difference arises. Those losses carried forward are set off against deferred tax liabilities carried in 
the balance sheet.

Deferred income tax
Deferred income tax is recognised in respect of temporary differences arising between the tax bases of assets and 
liabilities and their carrying amounts in the financial statements. Deferred income tax is determined using tax rates 
(and laws) that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the date of the balance sheet and are expected to apply 
when the related deferred income tax asset is realised or the deferred income tax liability is settled.

The principal differences arise from trading losses, depreciation of property, plant and equipment and relief on 
research and development expenditure.

We recognise a deferred tax asset to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profits will be available against 
which they can be used and deferred tax liabilities are provided on taxable temporary differences. Deferred tax assets 
and liabilities are reviewed at each reporting date and are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the 
related tax benefit will be realised or the deferred tax liability settled.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset where there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets against 
current tax liabilities and where the deferred tax assets and liabilities relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation 
authority on either the same taxable entity or different taxable entities where there is an intention to settle on a net basis.

Income tax (expense)/credit
The components of income tax (expense)/credit for the year are:

Current tax:
Current income tax
Adjustment in respect of prior years

Total current tax expense

Deferred tax:
Origination and reversal of temporary differences
Effect of changes in tax rates
Adjustment in respect of prior years

Total deferred tax (expense)/credit

Total tax (expense)/credit

2017 
£’000

(958)
38

(920)

(5,210)
(2,974)
1,218

(6,966)

(7,886)

2016 
£’000

(177)
–

(177)

(584)
280
926

622

445

99

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements8. Taxation continued
Reconciliation of the total tax (expense)/credit
The tax (expense)/credit shown in the income statement differs from the tax (expense)/credit that would apply if all accounting 
profits had been taxed at the UK corporation tax rate.

A reconciliation between the tax (expense)/credit and the accounting profit/(loss) multiplied by the UK corporation tax rate for the 
years ended 31 December 2017 and 2016 is as follows:

Group

Accounting profit/(loss) before tax

Tax expense at statutory income tax rate of 19.25% (2016: 20%)
Tax effects of:
Non-deductible expenses – listing fees
Non-deductible expenses – depreciation on non-qualifying 

fixed assets

Non-deductible expenses – other
Share based payments
Adjustment in respect of prior years
Effect of changes in tax rates

2017
£’000

Effective tax rate
%

2016 
£’000

Effective tax rate
%

18,675

(3,595)

19.25%

(17,198)

3,440

20%

–

0%

(368)

(2.1%)

(2,628)
(537)
630
1,218
(2,974)

14.1%
2.9%
(3.4%)
(6.5%)
15.9%

(2,261)
(863)
271
(54)
280

(13.1%)
(5.0%)
1.5%
(0.3%)
1.6%

Income tax (expense)/credit reported in the consolidated income 

statement

(7,886)

42.2%

445

2.6%

Adjustment in respect of prior years
During the years to 31 December 2017 and 2016 we submitted an amendment to prior year corporate tax returns (years ended 2016 
and 2015) that resulted in an increase in prior period losses. The amendments in 2017 related mainly to the reclassification of some 
store costs from non-qualifying to qualifying expenditure. The amendments in 2016 related mainly to prior year accounting 
adjustments to reflect actual VAT recovery following the Bank’s agreement of a partial exemption special method (‘PESM’) with 
HMRC. In addition, 2017 and 2016 include prior year adjustments to share based payments where the current and deferred tax 
treatment has been subsequently revised.

Effect of changes in tax rates
Legislation restricting the amount of profit that may be offset by brought forward losses to 50% was substantively enacted on 
31 October 2017 and was effective from 1 April 2017. As a result, the relevant deferred tax balances have been remeasured using the 
effective tax rate that will apply. The impact of the change in tax rate has been recognised in tax expense. Banks are also subject to a 
lower threshold of 25% of profits that can be utilised against losses accrued by 1 April 2015. However, this loss restriction relief does 
not apply to the first five years of banking activity so this particular restriction will not impact us.

Effective tax rate
The effective tax rate for the year is 42.2% (2016: 2.6%) due to the impact of the loss restriction relief on the net deferred tax asset.
The effective tax rate on profits, excluding the impact of the loss restriction relief, is 26.3%.

100

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED8. Taxation continued
Deferred tax
A deferred tax asset must be regarded as recoverable and therefore recognised only when, on the basis of all available evidence, it 
can be regarded as more likely than not there will be suitable tax profits from which the future of the underlying timing differences 
can be deducted. Further information on the details of the judgements taken around deferred tax are discussed in note 1.

The following table shows deferred tax recorded in the balance sheet and changes recorded in the Income tax expense:

Group

2017
Deferred tax assets
Deferred tax liabilities

Deferred tax assets (net)

At 1 January 2017
Income statement
Other comprehensive income
Equity

At 31 December 2017

2016
Deferred tax assets
Deferred tax liabilities

Deferred tax assets (net)

At 1 January 2016
Income statement
Other comprehensive income
Equity

At December 2016

Unused 
tax losses 
£’000

Available-for-sale 
securities 
£’000

Share-based 
payments 
£’000

Property, plant 
and equipment 
£’000

Intangible  
assets 
£’000

56,936
–

56,936

61,403
(3,787)
(680)
–

56,936

61,403
–

61,403

56,163
6,267
(1,027)
–

61,403

1,117
(1,226)

(109)

(1,723)
–
1,614
–

(109)

183
(1,906)

(1,723)

–
–
(1,723)
–

(1,723)

10,990
(368)

10,622

6,195
977
–
3,450

10,622

6,840
(645)

6,195

1,499
(658)
–
5,354

6,195

–
(7,747)

(7,747)

(4,478)
(3,269)
–
–

(7,747)

–
(4,478)

(4,478)

(1,861)
(2,617)
–
–

(4,478)

228
(6,233)

(6,005)

(5,118)
(887)
–
–

(6,005)

177
(5,295)

(5,118)

(2,748)
(2,370)
–
–

(5,118)

Total 
£’000

69,271
(15,574)

53,697

56,279
(6,966)
934
3,450

53,697

68,603
(12,324)

56,279

53,053
622
(2,750)
5,354

56,279

Relevant disclosures for the Company have not been included, as these are not materially different to the Group disclosure above.

9. Loans and advances to customers and banks

Accounting 
policy

Loans and advances made to our customers and banks are initially recognised at fair value – which is the cash 
consideration to originate the loan including any transaction costs – and measured subsequently at amortised cost 
using the effective interest rate method, which is detailed further in note 2. Interest on loans is included in the income 
statement and is reported as ‘Interest income’. Credit impairment losses are reported as a deduction from the carrying 
value of the loan and recognised in the income statement as ‘Credit impairment charges’.

Gross loans and advances to customers
Less: allowance for impairment

Net loans and advances to customers

Amounts include:
Repayable on demand or at short notice

Group 
31 December 
2017 
£’000

9,634,687
(14,361)

Group 
31 December 
2016 
£’000

5,872,864
(7,494)

Company 
31 December 
2017 
£’000

9,406,004
(13,033)

Company 
31 December 
2016 
£’000

5,712,571
(6,610)

9,620,326

5,865,370

9,392,971

5,705,961

160,251

49,215

160,251

53,218

101

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements9. Loans and advances to customers and banks continued

Individual (retail customers):
Overdrafts
Credit cards
Term loans
Mortgages
Corporate:
Overdrafts
Credit cards
Term loans
Asset and invoice finance
Senior secured lending

Group
31 December
2017
£’000

Group
31 December
2016
£’000

Company
31 December
2017
£’000

Company
31 December
2016
£’000

85,801
8,888
121,728
6,231,415

139,418
2,255
2,816,499
228,683
–

66,088
7,369
107,584
3,604,591

32,613
1,681
1,874,104
164,295
14,539

85,801
8,888
121,728
6,231,415

139,418
2,255
2,816,499
–
–

66,088
7,369
107,584
3,604,591

36,615
1,681
1,874,104
–
14,539

Gross loans and advances to customers

9,634,687

5,872,864

9,406,004

5,712,571

Variable rate loans
Fixed rate loans

Group
 31 December 
2017 
£’000

3,311,057
6,323,630

Group 
31 December 
2016 
£’000

2,372,376
3,500,488

Company 
31 December 
2017 
£’000

3,311,057
6,094,947

Company 
31 December 
2016 
£’000

2,372,376
3,340,195

Gross loans and advances to customers

9,634,687

5,872,864

9,406,004

5,712,571

Loan asset credit quality
All loans and advances are categorised as either ‘neither past due nor impaired’, ‘past due but not impaired’, ‘individually impaired’ or 
‘portfolio impaired’. For the purposes of the disclosures in the loan asset credit quality section below:
•  A loan is considered past due when the borrower has failed to make a payment when due under the terms of the loan contract. 
•  The impairment allowance includes allowances against financial assets that have been individually impaired and those subject to 

collective impairment. 

•  Loans neither past due nor impaired and loans that are past due but not impaired consist predominantly of corporate and retail 

loans that are performing and whilst not individually impaired, may be subject to a collective impairment allowance. 

•  Impaired loans that are individually assessed consist predominantly of corporate loans that are past due and for which an 

individual allowance has been raised. 

•  Portfolio impaired loans, which are not included in the categories above, are a subset of collectively impaired loans and consist 

predominantly of retail loans that are 90 days or more past due. 

102

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED9. Loans and advances to customers and banks continued

Neither past due nor impaired
Past due but not impaired
Individually impaired
Portfolio impaired

Total

Less: allowance for impairment

Total

Individually impaired
Collectively impaired*

Total allowance for impairment

Neither past due nor impaired
Past due but not impaired
Individually impaired
Portfolio impaired

Total

Less: allowance for impairment

Total

Individually impaired
Collectively impaired*

Total allowance for impairment

Group 2017

Company 2017

Loans and 
advances to 
customers 
£’000

9,486,149
109,007
12,282
27,249

Loans and 
advances to 
banks 
£’000

100,388
–
–
–

Loans and 
advances to 
customers 
£’000

9,259,339
109,007
10,409
27,249

9,634,687

100,388

9,406,004

(14,361)

–

(13,033)

Loans and 
advances to 
banks 
£’000

94,835
–
–
–

94,835

–

9,620,326

100,388

9,392,971

94,835

(2,759)
(11,602)

(14,361)

–
–

–

(1,512)
(11,521)

(13,033)

–
–

–

Group 2016

Company 2016

Loans and 
advances to 
customers 
£’000

5,762,719
88,811
6,555
14,779

5,872,864

Loans and 
advances  
to banks
 £’000

65,816
–
–
–

65,816

Loans and 
advances to 
customers 
£’000

5,603,481
88,640
5,671
14,779

5,712,571

(7,494)

–

(6,610)

Loans and 
advances to 
banks £’000

64,368
–
–
–

64,368

–

5,865,370

65,816

5,705,961

64,368

(1,825)
(5,669)

(7,494)

–
–

–

(941)
(5,669)

(6,610)

–
–

–

*  The collectively impaired provision includes provisions held against loans which are included in the neither past due nor impaired, the past due but not impaired and 

the portfolio impaired categories shown above. 

Allowance for impairment at 1 January
Write-offs
Balance sheet reclassification of operational loss provision
Increase in impairment allowance

Allowance for impairment at 31 December

Group
 31 December 
2017 
£’000

Group 
31 December 
2016 
£’000

Company 
31 December 
2017 
£’000

Company
 31 December 
2016 
£’000

(7,494)
1,423
–
(8,290)

(14,361)

(6,783)
3,483
924
(5,118)

(7,494)

(6,610)
1,262
–
(7,685)

(13,033)

(3,580)
797
924
(4,751)

(6.610)

Credit impairment charges of £8.2 million (2016: £4.7 million) in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income are shown 
net of recoveries on previously written off loans.

Past due but not impaired
Late processing and other administrative delays on the side of the borrower can lead to a financial asset being in past due but 
not impaired. 

103

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements9. Loans and advances to customers and banks continued
The gross amounts of loans and advances to customers by class that were past due but not impaired was as follows:

31 December 2017 

Past due less than 7 days
Past due 7–30 days
Past due 31–60 days
Past due 61–90 days
Over 90 days

Total

31 December 2016

Past due less than 7 days
Past due 7–30 days
Past due 31–60 days
Past due 61–90 days
Over 90 days

Total

10. Investment securities

Group

Company

Mortgages 
£’000

Corporate 
£’000

26,972
19,372
2,447
830
–

49,621

36,922
18,665
447
67
–

56,101

Group

Mortgages 
£’000

Corporate 
£’000

15,994
5,859
2,051
599
–

24,503

45,237
14,710
96
60
171

60,274

Other 
£’000

1,322
823
599
541
–

3,285

Other
 £’000

958
1,984
631
461
–

4,034

Total 
£’000

Mortgages 
£’000

Corporate 
£’000

65,216
38,860
3,493
1,438
–

109,007

26,972
19,372
2,447
830
–

49,621

36,922
18,665
447
67
–

56,101

Total 
£’000

Mortgages 
£’000

Corporate 
£’000

Company

62,189
22,553
2,778
1,120
171

88,811

15,994
5,859
2,051
599
–

24,503

45,237
14,710
96
60
–

60,103

Other 
£’000

1,322
823
599
541
–

3,285

Other
 £’000

958
1,984
631
461
–

4,034

Total 
£’000

65,216
38,860
3,493
1,438
–

109,007

Total 
£’000

62,189
22,553
2,778
1,120
–

88,640

Accounting 
policy

Settlement date accounting is used when recording financial asset transactions where a trade is settled through the 
regular settlement cycle for that particular investment. Financial assets that are transferred to a third party but do not 
qualify for derecognition are presented in the balance sheet as ‘Assets pledged as collateral’, if the transferee has the 
right to sell or repledge them.

Held to maturity investment securities
Held to maturity investments are carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method, less any impairment 
losses. A sale or reclassification of more than an insignificant amount of held to maturity investments would result in 
the reclassification of all held to maturity investments as available-for-sale and would prevent us from classifying 
investment securities as held to maturity for the current and the two following financial years.

Available-for-sale investment securities
Available-for-sale investment securities are initially recognised at fair value, which is the cash consideration including 
any transaction costs, and measured subsequently at fair value with gains and losses being recognised in other 
comprehensive income, except for impairment losses and foreign exchange gains and losses, until the investment 
security is derecognised. If an available-for-sale investment security is determined to be impaired, the cumulative gain 
or loss previously recognised in the statement of comprehensive income is recognised in the income statement. 
Interest is calculated using the effective interest method, and foreign currency gains and losses on monetary assets 
classified as available-for-sale are recognised in the income statement.

Reclassification of investment securities
We may choose to reclassify investment securities that are classified in the available-for-sale category to the held to 
maturity category if we have the intention and ability to hold these financial assets for the foreseeable future or until 
maturity at the date of reclassification.

Reclassifications are made at fair value as of the reclassification date. This fair value becomes the new cost or 
amortised cost as applicable. Effective interest rates for financial assets reclassified to loans and receivables and held 
to maturity categories are determined at the reclassification date.

104

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED10. Investment securities continued
Fair values of investment securities held at fair value

Group and Company

Recurring fair value measurements
As at 31 December 2017
Financial investments: available-for-sale
As at 31 December 2016
Financial investments: available-for-sale

Level 1
£’000

Level 2
£’000

Total
£’000

289,941

70,763

360,704

274,027

330,100

604,127

The classification of a financial instrument is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its 
entirety. The two levels of the fair value hierarchy relevant to the Group and Company are defined below.

Quoted market prices – Level 1
Investment securities are classified as Level 1 if their value is observable in an active market. Such instruments are valued by 
reference to unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets where the quoted price is readily available, 
and the price represents actual and regularly occurring market transactions on an arm’s length basis. An active market is one in 
which transactions occur with sufficient volume and frequency to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

Valuation technique using observable inputs – Level 2
Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset, either directly (as prices) or indirectly 
(derived from prices).

Reclassifications between categories
On 17 February 2017 £33.2 million, 18 April 2017 £60.4 million, 21 November 2017 £95.0 million, 19 December 2017 £87.8 million 
and on 22 December 2017 £46.1 million of financial assets classified as available-for-sale were reclassified as held to maturity. The 
carrying amount (excluding accrued interest) and fair value of the assets at 31 December 2017 were as follows:

At 31 December 2017

Carrying amount 
£’000

Fair value 
£’000

313,857

323,369

A £1.2 million fair value gain was recognised with respect to the reclassified assets in 2017; had these assets not been reclassified, an 
additional fair value gain of £0.9 million would have been recognised in other comprehensive income. The effective interest rates 
on available-for-sale assets reclassified to held to maturity at 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2017 ranged from 0.96% to 3.65%, 
with all cash flows expected to be recoverable.

At 31 December, financial investments classified as held to maturity were as follows:

Group and Company 

At 31 December 2017

At 31 December 2016

Carrying amount 
£’000

Fair value
 £’000

3,553,801

3,590,350

2,622,588

2,651,136

105

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements 
11. Property, plant and equipment

Accounting 
policy

Our property, plant and equipment primarily consists of investments and improvements in our store network and is 
stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and any recognised impairment.

We depreciated property, plant and equipment on a straight-line basis to its residual value using the following useful 
economic lives:

Leasehold improvements
Freehold land
Buildings
Fixtures and fittings and equipment
IT hardware

Lower of the remaining life of the lease or the useful life of the asset
Not depreciated
Up to 50 years
5 years
3 to 5 years

We keep depreciation rates, methods and the residual values underlying the calculation of depreciation of items of 
property, plant and equipment under review to take account of any change in circumstances.

Investment property consists of shops and offices which are located within the same buildings as some of our stores, 
where we have acquired the freehold interest. Investment property is held to earn rental income and for capital 
appreciation.

Investment property is also stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and any recognised impairment. Depreciation 
is calculated on a consistent basis with that applied to land and buildings as disclosed in the table above.

All items of property, plant and equipment are reviewed annually for impairment.

Group

Cost
1 January 2017
Additions
Disposals
Write-offs
Transfers
Reclassifications

31 December 2017
Accumulated depreciation
1 January 2017
Impairments
Charge for the year
Disposals
Write-offs
Transfers
Reclassifications

31 December 2017

Net book value

Investment 
property 
£’000

Leasehold 
improvements 
£’000

Freehold land and 
buildings 
£’000

Fixtures, fittings 
and equipment 
£’000

IT hardware 
£’000

Total 
£’000

–
3,305
–
–
7,547
–

171,056
36,226
(87)
(186)
(8,440)
(69)

84,571
50,421
–
(53)
956
(372)

10,852

198,500

135,523

–
–
81
–
–
–
–

81

21,982
251
8,171
(2)
(14)
(781)
(3)

29,604

3,376
–
1,216
–
(13)
1,018
–

5,597

10,771

168,896

129,926

20,817
5,827
(143)
–
(63)
–

26,438

10,937
–
3,739
(82)
–
(237)
–

14,357

12,081

30,731
4,098
(21)
–
–
–

307,175
99,877
(251)
(239)
–
(441)

34,808

406,121

24,190
80
4,672
(10)
–
–
–

28,932

60,485
331
17,879
(94)
(27)
–
(3)

78,571

5,876

327,550

106

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED11. Property, plant and equipment continued

Group

Cost
1 January 2016
Additions
Disposals
Transfers

31 December 2016
Accumulated depreciation
1 January 2016
Impairments
Charge for the year
Write-offs
Transfers

31 December 2016

Net book value

Investment 
property 
£’000

Leasehold 
improvements 
£’000

Freehold land and 
buildings 
£’000

Fixtures, fittings 
and equipment 
£’000

IT hardware 
£’000

Total 
£’000

–
–
–
–

–

–
–
–
–
–

–

–

156,238
46,444
–
(31,626)

171,056

17,110
35
6,800
413
(2,376)

21,982

149,074

8,273
44,672
–
31,626

84,571

–
–
1,000
–
2,376

3,376

81,195

17,400
3,417
–
–

20,817

7,920
161
2,834
22
–

10,937

9,880

27,439
3,295
(3)
–

30,731

19,063
44
5,054
29
–

24,190

6,541

209,350
97,828
(3)
–

307,175

44,093
240
15,688
464
–

60,485

246,690

Transfers represents costs associated with the improvements made to previously leased stores which we have purchased within 
the year. 

All investment property has been recognised within the last 12 months and, as such, there is not deemed to be a material difference 
between the carrying value of £10.8 million shown above and its fair value.

Relevant disclosures for the Company have not been included, as these are not materially different to the Group disclosure above.

12. Intangible assets

Accounting 
policy 

Goodwill
Goodwill arises on the acquisition of subsidiaries and represents the excess of the consideration transferred over our 
interest in net fair value of the net identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities of the acquiree and the fair 
value of the non-controlling interest in the acquiree.

For the purpose of impairment testing, goodwill acquired in a business combination is allocated to each of the 
cash-generating units (‘CGUs’), or groups of CGUs, that is expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination. 
Each unit or group of units to which the goodwill is allocated represents the lowest level within the entity at which the 
goodwill is monitored for internal management purposes.

Goodwill is not amortised, however it is reviewed for impairment on an annual basis. The recoverable amount of a 
CGU is the higher of its fair value less cost to sell, and the present value of its expected future cash flows. If the 
recoverable amount is less than the carrying value, an impairment loss is charged to the income statement. Goodwill 
is stated at cost less accumulated impairment losses. Any impairment is recognised immediately as an expense and is 
not subsequently reversed.

Other intangible assets
Software includes both purchased items and internally developed systems, which consists principally of identifiable 
and directly associated internal staff and other costs. 

Purchased intangible assets and costs directly associated with the development of systems are capitalised as 
intangible assets where there is an identifiable asset which we control and which will generate future economic 
benefits in accordance with IAS 38.

Costs to establish feasibility or to maintain existing performance are recognised as an expense. Intangible assets are 
amortised on a straight-line basis in profit or loss using the following useful economic lives:

Core banking software used for recording banking transactions
Other banking software
Software licences
Customer contracts

20 years
3 to 10 years
Licence period
10 years

All intangible assets are reviewed annually for impairment.

107

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements12. Intangible assets continued

Group

Cost
1 January 2017
Additions
Disposals
Write-offs
Reclassifications

31 December 2017

Amortisation
1 January 2017
Impairments
Charge for the year
Disposals
Reclassifications

31 December 2017

Net book value

Goodwill 
£’000

Customer 
contracts
 £’000

Software
 £’000

Total 
£’000

4,140
–
–
–
–

4,140

–
–
–
–
–

–

4,140

600
–
–
–
–

600

205
–
60
–
–

265

335

101,797
70,398
(22)
(30)
1,545

173,688

13,817
308
15,491
(6)
322

29,932

106,537
70,398
(22)
(30)
1,545

178,428

14,022
308
15,551
(6)
322

30,197

143,756

148,231

At 31 December 2017, core banking software with a useful economic life of 20 years had a carrying amount of £8.6 million (2016: 
£9.4 million). 

Group

Cost
1 January 2016
Additions
Disposals

31 December 2016

Amortisation
1 January 2016
Impairments
Charge for the year
Write-offs

31 December 2016

Net book value

Goodwill 
£’000

4,140
–
–

4,140

–
–
–
–

–

4,140

Customer 
contracts 
£’000

600
–
–

600

145
–
60
–

205

395

Software 
£’000

56,745
45,053
(1)

Total 
£’000

61,485
45,053
(1)

101,797

106,537

7,097
75
6,631
14

13,817

87,980

7,242
75
6,691
14

14,022

92,515

The goodwill held on our balance sheet is tested at least annually for impairment. For the purposes of impairment testing the 
goodwill is allocated to the appropriate CGU; of the total balance of £4.1 million (2016: £4.1 million), 100% has been allocated to 
SME Invoice Finance Limited.

The recoverable amount of SME Invoice Finance Limited has been based on a value-in-use calculation using pre-tax cash flow 
projections based on financial budgets and plans approved by management covering a seven-year period and a discount rate of 
10.7%. The long-term growth rate is consistent with external sources of information reviewed by management. Management 
believes that any reasonably possible change in the key assumptions above would not cause the recoverable amount of SME 
Invoice Finance Limited to fall below the balance sheet carrying value. Seven years was used as the basis for discounted cash flow 
calculation to align with the 2017-2023 plan, prepared by management and approved by the Board, and used in decision-making. 
The plan is reviewed and updated annually.

108

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED2017 
Software 
£’000

2016 
Software 
£’000

100,889
68,708
(22)
(30)
1,545

171,090

13,817
–
15,748
(6)
322
–

29,881

141,209

56,745
44,144
–
–
–

100,889

7,097
75
6,631
–
–
14

13,817

87,072

 31 December 
2017 
£’000

31 December 
2016 
£’000

26,546
21,679
3,147
1,413

52,785

52,785
–

19,103
15,580
7,597
720

43,000

43,000
–

 31 December 
2017 
£’000

31 December 
2016 
£’000

23,747
21,663
3,147
1,413

49,970

49,970
–

16,508
15,573
7,597
720

40,398

40,398
–

12. Intangible assets continued

Company

Cost
1 January
Additions
Disposals
Write-offs
Reclassifications

31 December

Amortisation
1 January
Impairments
Charge for the year
Disposals
Reclassifications
Write-offs

31 December

Net book value

13. Prepayments and accrued income

Group

Prepayments
Accrued income
VAT receivable
Other

Total prepayments and accrued income

Current portion
Non-current portion

Company

Prepayments
Accrued income
VAT receivable
Other

Total prepayments and accrued income

Current portion
Non-current portion

109

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements 31 December 
2017 
£’000

31 December 
2016 
£’000

11,322
14,921

26,243

14,612
11,631

11,733
14,558

26,291

12,905
13,386

 31 December 
2017 
£’000

31 December 
2016 
£’000

11,322
14,130
215,097

240,549

228,918
11,631

11,733
14,586
143,457

169,776

156,353
13,423

 31 December 
2017 
£’000

31 December 
2016 
£’000

272
5,348
67,285
16,007
59,358

148,270

138,667
9,603

2,161
6,522
58,074
13,120
26,207

106,083

96,709
9,374

 31 December 
2017 
£’000

31 December 
2016 
£’000

272
5,372
66,742
15,962
54,045

142,393

132,790
9,603

2,157
6,276
57,895
13,117
21,908

101,353

91,979
9,374

14. Other assets

Group

Assets pledged as collateral
Other

Total other assets

Current portion
Non-current portion

Company

Assets pledged as collateral
Other
Amounts owed by Group undertakings

Total other assets

Current portion
Non-current portion

15. Other liabilities

Group

Trade creditors
Other taxation and social security costs
Accruals
Deferred income
Other liabilities

Total other liabilities

Current portion
Non-current portion

Company

Trade creditors
Other taxation and social security costs
Accruals
Deferred income
Other liabilities

Total other liabilities

Current portion
Non-current portion

110

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED16. Called-up share capital

Accounting 
policy

When we issue new shares, incremental directly attributable costs are shown in equity as a deduction from the 
proceeds.

We only have a single class of shares. As at 31 December 2017 we had 88.5 million ordinary shares of 0.0001p (31 December 2016: 
80.3 million) authorised and in issue.

In July 2017, we issued 8.02 million ordinary shares of 0.0001p each, for consideration of £278 million. Related transaction costs of 
£2.9 million have been deducted from equity during the year.

Additionally, during the year we issued 0.2 million ordinary shares which relate to the exercise of previously awarded share options. 
These options contributed £892,000 to share premium.

Group and Company

Called-up ordinary share capital, issued and fully paid
At beginning of the year
Issued

At end of the year

Group and Company

Share premium account
At beginning of the year
Issued
Costs of shares issued

At end of the year

17. Share options

31 December 
2017 
£’000

31 December
2016 
£’000

–
–

–

–
–

–

31 December
2017
£’000

31 December
2016
£’000

1,027,645
278,785
(2,927)

629,304
403,572
(5,231)

1,303,503

1,027,645

Accounting 
policy

The grant date fair value of options awarded to colleagues is recognised as an expense over the period in which the 
colleagues become unconditionally entitled to the options. The expense (representing the value of the services 
received by us) is measured by reference to the fair value of the shares or share options granted on the date of the 
grant. The cost of the colleague services received in respect of the share options granted is recognised in the 
consolidated income statement over the period that the services are received, which is the vesting period. Graded 
vesting is applied where relevant.

The fair value of colleague share option plans is calculated at the grant date using a Black-Scholes model. The 
resulting cost is charged to the income statement over the vesting period. The value of the charge is adjusted to 
reflect expected and actual levels of vesting.

We offer options to Directors and colleagues. The exercise price of the granted options is equal to the estimated market price 
determined at the date of the grant. Options generally vest in equal tranches over five years and have a contractual option term of 
ten years, with the only vesting condition being the continuing service of the colleague. Options acquired via ‘exchange’ of some or 
all of the cash element of a colleague’s variable reward vest immediately. All our options are equity settled and we have no legal or 
constructive obligation to repurchase the shares or settle the options in cash.

111

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements 
17. Share options continued
The table below summarises the movements in the number of options outstanding and their weighted average exercise price:

Group

Outstanding at 1 January
Granted
Exercised
Lapsed

Outstanding at 31 December

Exercisable at 31 December

2017

2016

Number of 
options 
’000

Weighted average 
exercise price 
£

Number of 
options 
’000

Weighted average 
exercise price 
£

2,907
768
(195)
(103)

3,377

1,694

15.04
32.73
13.94
20.37

18.98

16.19

2,571
630
(162)
(132)

2,907

1,276

13.70
20.00
12.89
15.18

15.04

13.76

The average share price during 2017 was 3,488p (2016: 2,404p). The number of options outstanding at year end was as follows:

Exercise price

£9.00
£10.00
£12.00
£13.00
£13.50
£14.00
£16.00
£20.00
£32.73

Total

2017

2016

Number of 
options 
’000

Weighted average 
remaining 
contractual life 
years

Number of 
options 
’000

Weighted average 
remaining 
contractual life 
years

52
145
260
66
650
212
713
536
743

3,377

3.8
4.8
5.9
6.2
6.8
n/a
n/a
8.2
9.2

7.6

75
167
281
82
703
226
781
592
–

2,907

4.8
5.8
6.9
7.2
7.8
n/a
n/a
9.3
–

7.8

The fair value of the options granted during the year is determined using a Black-Scholes valuation model and was £3.3 million 
(2016: £1.6 million) and is based on the following assumptions:

Group

Weighted average risk-free interest rate
Weighted average expected life
Weighted average expected volatility
Weighted average expected dividend yield
Weighted average share price
Weighted average exercise price

2017 cash bonus 
exchange

2017 share 
options

0.16%
2.5 years
24.05%
nil
£32.73
£32.73

0.20%
3.25 years
22.05%
nil
£32.73
£32.73

Expected volatility is a measure of the amount by which our shares are expected to fluctuate during the life of an option. The 
expected volatility is estimated based on a statistical analysis of the historic share prices of other FTSE 350 banks over the most 
recent period which is commensurate with the expected life of the option. The analysis is based on FTSE 350 banks rather than our 
own share price due to insufficient available price data, having only been listed since March 2016.

We have no other remuneration related instruments in issue other than these employee share options.

112

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED 
18. Reconciliation of movements in retained earnings

Group

At 1 January
Profit/(loss) for the year

At 31 December

Company

At 1 January
Profit/(loss) for the year

At 31 December

2017 
£’000 

2016 
£’000 

(230,193)
10,789 

(213,440)
(16,753) 

(219,404)

(230,193) 

2017 
£’000 

2016 
£’000 

(235,750) 
8,914

(216,594) 
(19,156) 

(226,836) 

(235,750) 

19. Financial commitments
At 31 December 2017, we had irrevocable undrawn loan facilities granted to retail and commercial customers of £687.5 million 
(2016: £382.2 million).

In addition, as part of our retail and commercial operations, we had commitments of £138.3 million (2016: £156.2 million) in respect 
of credit card and overdraft facilities. These commitments represent agreements to lend in the future, subject to certain conditions. 
Such commitments are cancellable, subject to notice requirements, and given their nature are not expected to be drawn down to 
the full level of exposure.

20. Leases

Accounting 
policy

All of our leases are operating leases. The total payments made under our operating leases are charged to other 
operating expenses in the income statement on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease. When an operating 
lease is terminated before the lease period has expired, any payment we are required to make to the lessor by way of 
penalty is recognised as an expense in the period in which termination takes place.

Commitments under leases
We lease various offices and stores under non-cancellable operating lease arrangements. The total operating lease expenditure 
recognised in the statement of comprehensive income during the year was £19.6 million (2016: £17.1 million). The leases have 
various terms, escalation, renewal and rights. At the balance sheet date, future minimum payments under operating leases relating 
to land and buildings were as follows:

Group

Due
Within one year
Due in one to five years
Due in more than five years

Total

31 December
2017 
£’000

31 December
2016 
£’000

20,060
80,636
318,582

419,278

17,534 
71,954
290,574

380,062

Future income due under non-cancellable operating leases 
We lease out surplus space in some of our properties. The balances reflect the cash payments expected over the remaining 
non-cancellable term of each lease. Of the total below, £12.0 million (2016: £10.1 million) relates to sub-letting of leased stores. 
During the year, £1.4 million (2016: £631,000) was recognised as rental income in the statement of comprehensive income.

Group

Receivable
Within one year
Due in one to five years
Due in more than five years

Total

31 December
2017 
£’000

31 December
2016 
£’000

1,410
4,212
9,687

835
3,115
8,514

15,309

12,464

113

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements21. Financial instruments 

Accounting 
policy

Sale and repurchase agreements
Securities sold subject to repurchase agreements (‘repos’) are reclassified in the financial statements as pledged assets 
when the transferee has the right, by contract or custom, to sell or repledge the collateral; the counterparty liability is 
included in deposits from banks. The difference between sale and repurchase price is treated as interest and accrued 
over the life of the agreements using the effective interest method. Securities lent to counterparties are also retained in 
the financial statements.

Financial liabilities
Our holdings in financial liabilities are held at amortised cost. Financial liabilities measured at amortised cost are 
deposits from banks or customers and repurchase agreements. Financial liabilities are derecognised when 
extinguished.

Derecognition
Financial assets are derecognised when the contractual rights to receive the cash flows from these assets have ceased 
to exist or the assets have been transferred and substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the assets are 
also transferred. Financial liabilities are derecognised when they have been redeemed or otherwise extinguished.
On derecognition of a financial asset, the difference between the carrying amount of the asset (or the carrying 
amount allocated to the portion of the asset derecognised) and the sum of: (i) the consideration received (including 
any new assets obtained less any new liability assumed); and (ii) any cumulative gain or loss that had been recognised 
in other comprehensive income, is recognised in profit or loss. Any interest in transferred financial assets that qualify 
for derecognition that is created or retained is recognised as a separate asset or liability.

Collateral furnished under standard repurchase agreements and securities lending and borrowing transactions is not 
derecognised because we retain substantively all the risks and rewards on the basis of the predetermined repurchase 
price, and the criteria for derecognition are therefore not met.

Our financial instruments primarily comprise customer deposits, loans to customers, cash held at banks and investment securities. 
All of these arise as a result of our normal operations. We do not enter into transactions for speculative purposes and there are no 
instruments held for trading. From time to time, we may use interest rate derivatives such as swaps to manage part of our interest 
rate risk. 

The main financial risks arising from the our financial instruments are credit risk, liquidity risk and market risks (price and interest 
rate risk). 

114

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED22. Credit risk 

Accounting 
policy

Assets carried at amortised cost
We assess at each reporting date whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset is impaired. The impairment 
relating to loans and advances is calculated and assigned in accordance with the accounting standards for individual 
and collective impairment:
•  Impairment of individual loans is designed to recognise specific risks identified following the occurrence of a loss 

event; for example, a commercial customer whose business has gone into administration. If loans are considered to 
be at risk, an individual assessment will be performed. 

•  For loans that are not considered to be individually impaired (whether individually significant or not), a collective 

impairment assessment is performed. Collective provisions are intended to reflect the estimated amount of losses 
incurred on a collective basis, but which have yet to be individually identified. The lending exposure subject to 
collective impairment is assessed for each group of loans with similar credit risk characteristics.

Collective impairment models are based on analysis of historical arrears data and estimated loss rates, in order to 
derive the expected loss net of the recoverable value. For the purposes of a collective evaluation of impairment, 
financial assets are grouped on the basis of the product risk profile: residential mortgage lending, commercial lending 
and consumer lending. The carrying amount of the asset is reduced through the use of an allowance account and the 
amount of the loss is recognised in the income statement.

When a loan is uncollectable, it is written off against the related allowance for loan impairment. Such loans are written 
off after all the necessary procedures have been completed and the amount of the loss has been determined. The 
maximum time a loan can remain in past due without being written off is 24 months. Impairment charges relating to 
loans and advances to banks and customers are classified in credit impairment charges while impairment charges 
relating to investment securities (held to maturity) are classified in ‘Net gains/losses on investment securities’.

If, in a subsequent period, the amount of the impairment loss decreases and the decrease can be related objectively to 
an event occurring after the impairment was recognised, the previously recognised impairment loss is reversed by 
adjusting the allowance account. The amount of the reversal is recognised in the income statement.

Assets classified as available-for-sale
We assess at each date of the balance sheet whether there is objective evidence that a financial asset or a group of 
financial assets is impaired. Impairment losses on available-for-sale assets are recognised by reclassifying the losses 
accumulated in the fair value reserve in equity to profit or loss. The cumulative loss that is reclassified from equity to 
profit or loss is the difference between the acquisition cost, net of any principal repayment and amortisation, and the 
current fair value, less any impairment loss previously recognised in profit or loss.

Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to us if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual 
obligations, and arises principally from our loans and advances to customers and other banks, and investment debt securities.

The Chief Risk Officer is responsible for managing our credit risks through the following:
•  Defining the enterprise risk management structure and quantifying our risk appetite. 
•  Formulating credit policies covering collateral requirements, credit assessment, risk grading and reporting, documentary and legal 

procedures and compliance with regulatory and statutory requirements.

•  Establishing the authorisation structure for the approval and renewal of credit facilities.
•  Limiting concentrations of exposure to counterparties and industries (for loans and advances and similar exposures) and by issuer, 

credit rating bands and market liquidity (for investment securities).

For details about our loans and advances to customers and the allowance for impairment/loss held by us against those assets, 
please refer to note 9.

115

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements22. Credit risk continued
The Group invests in high-quality liquid debt instruments as required by our Securities Trading and Investment policy. The analysis 
below details the credit rating of the securities as at 31 December 2017 and 31 December 2016. No allowance for impairment or 
loss was held against any of these assets at 31 December 2017 or 31 December 2016.

Credit rating

AAA
AA- to AA+
A- to A+
Lower than A-

Total

Designated at fair 
value 2017 
£’000

Designated at fair 
value 2016
 £’000

3,104,293
506,539
134,194
169,479

2,434,852
458,112
141,590
192,161

3,914,505

3,226,715

We have pledged £4,478.0 million (2016: £2,725.0 million) of assets as encumbered collateral which can be called upon in the event 
of default. Of this, £2,419.0 million (2016: £2,062.0 million) is made up of high-quality securities and £2,059.0 million (2016: £663.0 
million) is from our own loan portfolio prepositioned with the Bank of England to support some of the Term Funding Scheme  
(‘TFS’) drawings.

£4,358.0 million (2016: £2,087.0 million) of this encumbered collateral is pledged to the Bank of England through the Bank’s 
participation in the TFS to support the £3,321.0 million (2016: £543.0 million) of cash drawn down. The bank repaid its outstanding 
Funding for Lending Scheme (‘FLS’) drawings in November 2017.

The remaining £120.0 million (2016: £638.0 million) is pledged with the Bank of England and market participants in the form 
of repo.

Collateral held and other credit enhancements, and their financial effect
We hold collateral against loans and advances to customers principally in the form of mortgages over residential and commercial 
real estate and guarantees which we have the ability to call on in the event of default of the borrower. The table below details our 
gross credit risk exposure and the effects of collateral. The value of collateral has been limited to the principal amount outstanding 
to eliminate effects of over-collateralisation.

At 31 December 2017

Loans and advances to banks
Loans and advances to customers:
– Loans to individuals (note 9)
– Loans to corporate entities (note 9)
Investment securities (note 10)
Other assets (note 14)

Total

Credit risk exposures relating to off-balance sheet items are as follows:

At 31 December 2017

Loan commitments and other credit-related obligations

Total

At 31 December 2016

Loans and advances to banks
Loans and advances to customers:
– Loans to individuals (note 9])
– Loans to corporate entities (note 9)
Investment securities (note 10)
Other assets (note 14)

Total

116

Gross 
exposure
£’000

100,388

Collateral
£’000

Net
exposure
£’000

–

100,388

6,447,832
3,186,855
3,914,505
26,243

(6,152,994)
(2,502,159)
–
–

294,838
684,696
3,914,505
26,243

13,675,823

(8,655,153)

5,020,670

Gross
exposure

848,561

Collateral

Net
exposure

–

848,561

14,524,384

(8,655,153)

5,869,231

Gross
exposure
£’000

65,816

Collateral
£’000

–

Net
exposure
£’000

65,816

3,785,632
2,087,232
3,226,715
26,291

(3,615,433)
(1,566,236)
–
–

170,199
520,996
3,226,715
26,291

9,191,686

(5,181,669)

4,010,017

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED22. Credit risk continued
Credit risk exposures relating to off-balance sheet items are as follows:

At 31 December 2016

Loan commitments and other credit-related obligations

Total

Gross
exposure
£’000

538,506

Collateral
£’000

Net
exposure
£’000

–

538,506

9,730,192

(5,181,669)

4,548,523

As shown above, 71% (2016: 65%) of the total maximum exposure is derived from loans and advances to banks and customers; 29% 
(2016: 35%) represents investments in high-quality debt securities.

Residential mortgage lending
The table below stratifies credit exposures from mortgage loans and advances to customers by ranges of debt-to-value (‘DTV’) ratio.

The increase in concentration for the DTV ratio > 80% is due to both the launch of our 90% loan-to-value mortgage product within 
the year and the acquisition of a portfolio of UK mortgages on 2 June 2017. The portfolio was originated over 10 years ago, has 
been stressed at significantly higher rates and has a good payment performance.

The average DTV of the residential mortgage loan book is 60% (2016: 58%):

Group

DTV ratio
Less than 50%
51–60%
61–70%
71–80%
81–90%
91–100%
More than 100%

Total residential mortgage lending

A geographic analysis of the location of residential mortgage collateral is set out below:

31 December
2017
£’000

31 December
2016
£’000

1,719,635
1,112,838
1,425,195
1,135,959
667,725
115,253
54,810

1,121,993
787,883
847,743
549,732
206,293
41,224
49,723

6,231,415

3,604,591

Group

Region
Greater London
South east
South west
East of England
North west
West Midlands
Yorkshire and the Humber
East Midlands
Wales
North east
Northern Ireland
Scotland

Total residential mortgage lending

31 December 2017

31 December 2016

£’000

%

£’000

%

2,899,479
1,395,059
424,172
354,639
341,335
214,841
187,979
177,366
105,223
77,967
32,018
21,337

6,231,415

47%
22%
7%
6%
5%
3%
3%
3%
2%
1%
1%
0%

1,898,594
818,034
211,321
175,409
136,968
99,167
77,575
85,748
45,800
32,687
–
23,288

53%
23%
6%
5%
4%
3%
2%
2%
1%
1%
0%
0%

100%

3,604,591

100%

Loans and advances to corporate customers
The general creditworthiness of a corporate customer tends to be the most relevant indicator of credit quality of a loan extended to 
it. However, collateral provides additional security and we generally request that corporate borrowers provide it. We usually take 
collateral in the form of a first charge over real estate (retail and commercial), floating charges over all corporate assets and other 
liens and guarantees. 

117

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements22. Credit risk continued
Concentrations of commercial credit risk
We monitor concentrations of credit risk by sector for commercial term loans exposure. Our risk appetite is set at the beginning of 
every year and monitored as part of the Board Committee.

Group

Real estate (rent, buy and sell)
Legal, accountancy and consultancy
Health and social work
Hospitality
Real estate (management of)
Retail
Construction
Investment and unit trusts
Recreation, cultural and sport
Real estate (development)
Education
Other

Total commercial term loans

2017

2016

Gross balance 
£’000

Concentration 
%

Gross balance 
£’000

Concentration 
%

1,704,478
303,507
214,271
185,053
103,808
84,495
69,137
20,872
17,823
25,608
4,270
83,177

2,816,499

61%
11%
7%
7%
4%
3%
2%
1%
1%
1%
0%
2%

1,064,194
276,164
177,931
95,600
90,240
37,009
58,204
20,448
8,643
2,036
1,484
42,151

57%
15%
10%
5%
5%
2%
3%
1%
0%
0%
0%
2%

100%

1,874,104

100%

The average debt-to-value (‘DTV’) of the commercial term loan book is 58% (2016: 57%)

Group

Total commercial lending
Percentage of total lending
Value of top ten commercial exposures
Top ten commercial exposures as a percentage of total commercial lending

31 December
2017
£’000

3,186,855
33%
250,109
8%

31 December
2016
£’000

2,087,232
36%
160,239
8%

Non-performing loans
Our non-performing loan exposure has grown in 2017 driven by the growing maturity of the lending portfolios and is in line with 
expectations. The cost of risk remains low and stable, this is driven by the collateralisation of the exposure.

Group

Total

2017

2016

Non-performing 
loans 
£’000

Non-performing 
loans 
ratio*

26,230

0.27%

Cost of 
risk

0.11%

Non-performing 
loans 
£’000

Non-performing 
loans 
ratio*

7,246

0.12%

Cost of 
risk

0.10%

*  The non-performing-loan ratio is calculated as the ratio of the gross outstanding amount of loans with more than three instalments unpaid to the total gross 

outstanding amount. 

Forbearance relates to when a concession on the contractual terms of a loan is made to a customer as a result of financial 
difficulties. Changes in terms result in an amended monthly cash flow from:
•  payment holidays;
•  term extensions; or
•  payment concessions.

As at 31 December 2017, the exposure from forbearance arrangements was £11.1 million (31 December 2016: £9.6 million).  
All forborne loans are classified within the portfolio impaired balance within note 9.

Management is confident in its ability to continue to control and sustain minimal exposure of credit risk to the Group resulting  
from both its loans and advances portfolio and debt securities based on the following:
•  79% (2016: 75%) of the debt securities are AAA rated and 13% (2016: 14%) are AA rated; 
•  91% (2016: 88%) of loans and advances to customers are backed by collateral; and
•  Over 99% (2016: 99%) of the loans and advances portfolio are considered to be unimpaired.

118

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED23. Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that we will encounter difficulty in meeting obligations associated with our financial liabilities that are settled 
by delivering cash or another financial asset.

Our Board of Directors set our risk appetite and policy for managing liquidity risk and delegates responsibility for oversight of the 
implementation of this policy to the Asset and Liability Management Committee (‘ALCO’). Our Treasury function manages the 
liquidity position on a day-to-day basis under the oversight of the CFO, CRO and ALCO. Our approach is to ensure that we can meet 
payments as they fall due – both in normal conditions and in the event of a severe liquidity stress, and that we can survive a severe 
liquidity stress event and continue as a going concern. The key elements of our liquidity strategy are as follows:
•  building a franchise that has a stable deposit funding base, free of short-term unsecured wholesale funding; 
•  maintaining, at all times, a stock of liquid assets that are of sufficient quality and quantity so as to be able to withstand liquidity 

stress scenarios; 

•  monitoring liquidity risk exposures on an ongoing basis under a variety of market-wide and idiosyncratic liquidity stress scenarios; 

and 

•  maintaining a diversified funding base. 

Expected maturity dates of our financial instruments do not differ significantly from the contract dates except for retail deposits. 
These are repayable on demand or at short notice on a contractual basis.

In practice, however, these instruments provide long-term stable funding for our operations and liquidity needs because of the 
stable deposit nature of our business model.

While we have drawn down £3,321 million of borrowings from the Bank of England’s Term Funding Scheme (‘TFS’), our business 
model is primarily that of a deposit-led bank – with more deposits than loans. Given our deposit-led business model, we do not 
consider that the closure of the TFS drawdown window in 2018 will adversely affect us from the perspective of obtaining funding in 
the near term, nor refinancing TFS drawings in the long term. We fund our lending growth and plan to refinance our TFS drawings 
through deposit growth.

The tables below set out the maturity structure of our financial instruments, which categorises liabilities by their earliest possible 
contractual maturity date; this differs from the behavioural maturity characteristics of the deposit base in both normal and stressed 
conditions, as the behavioural maturity is much longer than the contractual maturity.

Group

Repayable on 
demand
£’000

Up to 
3 months
£’000

3–6 months
£’000

6–12 months
£’000

1–5 years
£’000

Over 5 years
£’000

No contractual 
maturity
£’000

Total
£’000

31 December 2017
Cash and balances with the 

Bank of England

2,070,398

Loans and advances to 

banks

Loans and advances to 

customers

Investment securities

100,388

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

– 2,070,398

–

100,388

–
–

188,444
55,993

172,798
61,854

353,233
458,934

2,720,247 10,457,731
611,297
2,990,132

295,051 14,187,504
– 4,178,210

Total financial assets

2,170,786

244,437

234,652

812,167

5,710,379 11,069,028

295,051 20,536,500

Other assets

Total assets

–

116,080

152

343

53,491

4,840

2,004

176,910

2,170,786

360,517

234,804

812,510

5,763,870 11,073,868

297,055 20,713,410

Deposits from customers
Deposits from central banks
Repurchase agreements
Other liabilities

(8,437,216)
–
–
(640)

(564,803)
(32,159)
(3,492)
(116,368)

(389,139)
(417)
(3,594)
(110)

(1,128,987)
(888)
(9,479)
(470)

(597,995)
(91,831)
(3,395,886)
(53,713)

–
–
–
(4,890)

(580,926) (11,699,066)
–
(125,295)
– (3,412,451)
(176,191)
–

Total financial liabilities

(8,437,856)

(716,822)

(393,260)

(1,139,824)

(4,139,425)

(4,890)

(580,926) (15,413,003)

Capital

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

Total liabilities

(8,437,856)

(716,822)

(393,260)

(1,139,824)

(4,139,425)

(4,890)

(580,926) (15,413,003)

Cumulative liquidity gap

(6,267,070)

(6,623,375)

(6,781,831)

(7,109,145)

(5,484,700) 5,584,278

119

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements23. Liquidity risk continued

Group

31 December 2016
Cash and balances with the 

Bank of England

Loans and advances to 

banks

Loans and advances to 

customers

Investment securities

Repayable on 
demand
£’000

Up to 
3 months
£’000

3–6 months
£’000

6–12 months
£’000

1–5 years
£’000

Over 5 years
£’000

No contractual 
maturity
£’000

Total
£’000

463,382

65,816

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

–

463,382

65,816

–
–

126,785
181,312

128,610
112,500

237,330
364,875

1,757,258
1,620,266

6,443,358
239,027

167,819
–

8,861,160
2,517,980

Total financial assets

529,198

308,097

241,110

602,205

3,377,524

6,682,385

167,819 11,908,338

Other assets

Total assets

–

37,472

82

171

1,423

5,222

25,448

69,818

529,198

345,569

241,192

602,376

3,378,947

6,687,607

193,267 11,978,156

Deposits from customers
Deposits from central banks
Repurchase agreements
Other liabilities

(5,607,783)
–
–
(618)

(447,531)
(211,946)
(299)
–

(478,515)
(320,990)
(544)
–

(651,664)
(932)
(1,235)
–

(626,563)
(125,208)
(554,424)
–

Total financial liabilities

(5,608,401)

(659,776)

(800,049)

(653,831)

(1,306,195)

Capital

–

–

–

–

–

Total liabilities

(5,608,401)

(659,776)

(800,049)

(653,831)

(1,306,195)

–
–
–
–

–

–

–

(171,774)
–
–
–

(7,938,830)
(659,076)
(556,502)
(618)

(171,774)

(9,200,026)

–

–

(171,774)

(9,200,026)

Cumulative liquidity gap

(5,079,203)

(5,393,410)

(5,952,267)

(6,003,722)

(3,930,970)

2,756,637

120

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED31 December 2017

Loans and advances to 

banks 

Loans and advances to 

customers
Other assets

Total assets

24. Market risk
Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as interest rates will affect our income or the value of our holdings of 
financial instruments. The objective of our market risk management strategy is to manage and control market risk exposures within 
acceptable parameters to ensure solvency while optimising the return on risk.

Interest rate risk
We manage this risk within a risk appetite framework that is set and approved by the Board. 

Limits are set for the economic value of equity (‘EVE’) and net interest income (‘NII’). EVE shall not drop more than £20 million based 
on the worse of a +200bp or -200bp instantaneous symmetrical parallel shock to interest rates, and one-year NII shall not drop 
more than £15 million based on the same shock. The EVE limits are monitored daily by risk, whilst NII limits are monitored weekly. 
Performance against limits are reported monthly to the ALCO (with exceptions communicated by email) and more regularly to 
senior management, as well as being noted by the Risk Oversight Committee and the Board.

Furthermore, a £15 million limit is set for a set of asymmetrical movements between LIBOR and the Bank of England Base Rate. Our 
Treasury Risk function runs a series of other interest rate risk simulations on a monthly basis to ensure that the ALCO is kept apprised 
of any other risks not captured by the policy measures.

While we occasionally enter into hedging arrangements the impact of these arrangements is immaterial.

The tables below set out the interest rate risk repricing gaps of our balance sheet in the specified time buckets, indicating how 
much of each type of asset and liability reprices in the indicated periods.

Up to 3 months
£’000

3–6 months
£’000

6–12 months
£’000

1–5 years
£’000

Over 5 years
£’000

Non-interest
bearing
£’000

Total
£’000

–

–

–

–

–

100,388

100,388

4,173,131
5,586,676

9,759,807

343,562
41,750

385,312

(595,959)
(355)
–

753,097
136,687

4,310,713
477,737

889,784

4,788,450

(1,124,130)
(715)
–

(608,532)
(52,224)
–

36,898
–

36,898

–
(4,742)
–

2,925
391,791

9,620,326
6,634,641

495,104

16,355,355

(3,486,915)
26,048
(1,095,889)

(11,668,738)
(3,590,728)
(1,095,889)

Deposits from customers
Other liabilities
Shareholders’ funds

(5,853,202)
(3,558,740)
–

Total liabilities

(9,411,942)

(596,314)

(1,124,845)

(660,756)

(4,742)

(4,556,756)

(16,355,355)

Interest rate sensitivity 

gap

Cumulative gap

347,865

347,865

(211,002)

(235,061)

4,127,694

32,156

(4,061,652)

136,863

(98,198)

4,029,496

4,061,652

–

Up to 3 months
£’000

3–6 months
£’000

6–12 months
£’000

1–5 years
£’000

Over 5 years
£’000

Non-interest
bearing
£’000

31 December 2016

Loans and advances to 

banks

Loans and advances to 

customers
Other assets

Total assets

Deposits from customers
Other liabilities
Shareholders’ funds

–

–

–

–

–

65,816

65,816

2,577,363
3,069,473

5,646,836

(3,781,029)
(1,141,697)
–

229,666
1,565

231,231

(606,297)
(36,641)
–

488,134
81,185

2,469,304
577,511

569,319

3,046,815

(649,191)
(643)
–

(633,188)
(20,424)
–

19,625
56,847

76,472

81,278
339,521

5,865,370
4,126,102

486,615

10,057,288

–
–
–

–

(2,280,874)
(102,769)
(804,535)

(7,950,579)
(1,302,174)
(804,535)

(3,188,178)

(10,057,288)

Total liabilities

(4,922,726)

(642,938)

(649,834)

(653,612)

Interest rate sensitivity 

gap

Cumulative gap

724,110

724,110

(411,707)

312,403

(80,515)

2,393,203

76,472

(2,701,563)

231,888

2,625,091

2,701,563

–

–

–

121

–

–

Total
£’000

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements24. Market risk continued
A positive interest rate sensitivity gap exists when more assets than liabilities reprice during a given period. A positive gap position 
tends to benefit net interest income in an environment where interest rates are rising; however, the actual effect will depend on a 
number of factors including actual repayment dates and interest rate sensitivities within the banding periods. The converse is true 
for a negative interest rate sensitivity gap.

The below shows the sensitivity of projected net interest income to a +2.00% and -2.00% parallel interest rate shock for a one-year 
forecasting period.

200bps decrease 
(not floored at 
zero) 
£’000

Sensitivity of projected net interest income to parallel interest rate shock for a one-year forecasting period

200bps increase 
£’000

At 31 December 2017
At 31 December 2016

25. Fair value of financial instruments

(7,576)
(3,244)

7,051
2,460

Accounting 
policy

Amortised cost measurement and determination of fair value
The ‘amortised cost’ of a financial asset or financial liability is the amount at which the financial asset or financial 
liability is measured at initial recognition, minus principal repayments, plus or minus the cumulative amortisation using 
the effective interest method of any difference between the initial amount recognised and the maturity amount, 
minus any reduction for impairment.

‘Fair value’ is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction 
between market participants at the measurement date in the principal or, in its absence, the most advantageous 
market to which we have access at that date. The fair value of a liability reflects its non-performance risk.

For financial instruments traded in active markets, we determine the fair value based on quoted market prices or 
dealer price quotations. This includes quoted debt instruments on major exchanges and broker quotes.

A financial instrument is regarded as quoted in an active market if quoted prices are readily and regularly available from 
an exchange, dealer, broker or pricing service and those prices represent actual and regularly occurring market 
transactions on an arm’s length basis. If the above criteria are not met, the market is regarded as being inactive. 
Indications that a market is inactive are when there is a wide bid-offer spread or significant increase in the bid-offer 
spread or there are few recent transactions.

The fair values of financial instruments are based on market prices where available, or are estimated using other valuation 
techniques. Where they are short term in nature or re-price frequently, fair value approximates to carrying value. Apart from 
investment securities all other assets and liabilities are deemed to have a fair value hierarchy of level 3. Level 3 is defined as: inputs 
for the asset or liability that are not based on observable market data (unobservable inputs). This level includes equity investments 
and debt instruments with significant unobservable components.

122

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED 
25. Fair value of financial instruments continued

Group

31 December 2017
Assets
Cash and balances with the Bank of England
Loans and advances to banks
Loans and advances to customers
Investment securities

Liabilities
Deposits from customers
Deposits from central banks
Repurchase agreements

31 December 2016
Assets
Cash and balances with the Bank of England
Loans and advances to banks
Loans and advances to customers
Investment securities

Liabilities
Deposits from customers
Deposits from central banks
Repurchase agreements

Carrying value 
£’000

Quoted market 
price 
Level 1 
£’000

Using observable 
inputs 
Level 2 
£’000

With significant 
unobservable 
inputs 
Level 3
 £’000

Total fair 
value
 £’000

2,111,630
100,388
9,620,326
3,914,505

11,668,738
3,320,900
121,558

434,612
65,816
5,865,370
3,226,715

7,950,579
543,000
653,091

–
–
–
922,006

–
–
–
3,029,048

2,111,630
100,388
10,084,203
–

2,111,630
100,388
10,084,203
3,951,054

–
–
–

–
–
–

11,650,419
3,320,900
121,558

11,650,419
3,320,900
121,558

–
–
–
877,226

–
–
–
2,378,037

–
–
–

–
–
–

434,612
65,816
6,093,436
–

7,946,687
543,000
653,091

434,612
65,816
6,093,436
3,255,263

7,946,687
543,000
653,091

For cash and balances with the Bank of England and repurchase agreements, the carrying value approximates to the fair value, and 
therefore no pricing level has been identified for them in the above table.

Information on how fair values are calculated for the financial assets and liabilities noted above are explained below:

(a) Cash and balances with the Bank of England/loans and advances to banks
Fair value is calculated based on the present value of future principal and interest cash flows, discounted at the market rate of 
interest at the balance sheet date. Fair values approximate carrying amounts as their balances are generally short-dated.

(b) Loans and advances to customers
Fair value is calculated based on the present value of future principal and interest cash flows, discounted at the market rate of 
interest at the balance sheet date, adjusted for future credit losses and prepayments, if considered material.

(c) Investment securities
The fair value of investment securities is based on either observed market prices for those securities that have an active trading 
market (fair value Level 1 assets), or using observable inputs (in the case of fair value Level 2 assets).

(d) Deposits from customers
Fair values are estimated using discounted cash flows, applying current rates offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. 
The fair value of a deposit repayable on demand is approximated by its carrying value.

(e) Deposits from central banks/repurchase agreements
Fair values are estimated using discounted cash flows, applying current rates. Fair values approximate carrying amounts as their 
balances are generally short-dated.

123

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements26. Related parties
Key management personnel
Our key management personnel, and persons connected with them, are considered to be related parties for disclosure purposes. 
Key management personnel are defined as those persons having authority and responsibility for planning, directing and controlling 
the activities of the Group. The Directors and members of the Executive Leadership Team are considered to be the key 
management personnel for disclosure purposes.

Key management compensation
Total compensation cost for key management personnel for the year by category of benefit was as follows:

Group

Short-term benefits
Share-based payment costs

Total compensation for key management personnel

2017 
£’000

4,817
2,388

7,205

2016 
£’000

3,891
4,108

7,999

Short-term employee benefits include salary, medical insurance, bonuses and cash allowances paid to key management personnel. 
The share-based payment cost includes the IFRS 2 charge for the year associated with listing awards awarded in previous years. The 
cost includes the in-year IFRS 2 costs for Listing Share Awards granted to selected key management personnel in recognition of 
their significant contribution to the successful private placement and admission of Metro Bank to the London Stock Exchange.

Banking transactions with key management personnel
We provide banking services to Directors and other key management personnel and persons connected to them. Loan transactions 
during the year and the balances outstanding at 31 December were as follows:

Group

Loans payable to the Group
Loans outstanding at 1 January
Loans relating to former key management personnel
Loans relating to persons and companies no longer considered related parties

Loans outstanding at 1 January for current key management personnel

Loans issued during the year
Loan repayments during the year

Loans outstanding at 31 December

Interest expense on loans payable to the Group

2017 
£’000

3,191
–
(321)

2,870

349
(262)

2,957

80

2016 
£’000

2,529
(529)
–

2,000

1,250
(59)

3,191

82

There were seven (31 December 2016: nine) loans outstanding at 31 December 2017 totalling £3.0 million (31 December 2016:  
£3.2 million). Of these, six are residential mortgages secure on property and one is an unsecured loan; all loans were provided  
on normal commercial terms which can be found on our website (www.metrobankonline.co.uk).

In addition to the loans detailed above, the bank has issued credit cards and granted overdraft facilities on current accounts to 
Directors and key management personnel. At 31 December 2017 there was only one overdrawn current account (£296) to Directors 
and key management personnel and all outstanding credit card balances were repaid in January 2017.

Credit card balances outstanding at 31 December were as follows:

Group

Credit cards outstanding at 31 December

Deposit balances outstanding at 31 December were as follows:

Group

Deposits outstanding at 1 January
Deposits relating to persons and companies no longer considered related parties
Deposits relating to new key management personnel

Net amounts deposited

Deposits outstanding at 31 December

124

2017 
£’000

27

2017 
£’000

5,193
(2,967)
44

1,163

3,433

2016 
£’000

10

2016 
£’000

4,544
–
–

649

5,193

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED26. Related parties continued
Other transactions with related parties
The following transactions were carried out with related parties:

Group

Architectural design services
Branding, marketing and advertising

Total purchase of services with entities connected to key management personnel

Amounts outstanding as at 31 December owed by Metro Bank

2017 
£’000

4,135
513

4,648

23

2016 
£’000

2,635
521

3,156

382

Architecture, design and branding services are provided by InterArch, Inc. (‘InterArch’), a firm which is owned by Shirley Hill, the wife 
of Vernon W. Hill, II, the Non-Executive Chairman.

In order to ensure that the terms of the InterArch arrangements are consistent with those that could be obtained from an 
independent third party, and in accordance with the Articles, the contractual arrangements with InterArch are subject to periodic 
review by our Audit Committee using benchmarking reviews conducted by independent third parties. The Audit Committee has 
concluded that contracts for services with InterArch are at arm’s length and are at least as beneficial as those which could be 
obtained in the market from an alternative supplier. 

Architectural design services
InterArch provide various architectural design services, including pre-design, architectural design, interior design, facilities 
coordination, construction management, landscape architectural, signage, security design and layout and procurement services. 
The fee structure for each project is based on a fixed percentage of projected hard costs. Certain additional services are provided 
on an hourly basis. The contract for architectural design services has recently been renegotiated and the Audit Committee has 
taken steps to ensure that it continues to be at arm’s length as part of the renegotiation process.

Branding, marketing and advertising
InterArch also provide branding, marketing and advertising services. The agreement terminated on 31 December 2017 and a new 
agreement was signed in January 2018 covering the period up to 31 December 2018.

27. Capital management
Capital is held to protect our depositors, cover our inherent risks, provide a cushion for stress events and to support our business 
strategy. In assessing the adequacy of our capital resources, we consider our risk appetite, the material risks to which we are 
exposed and the appropriate strategies required to manage those risks.

We prepare an annual Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process document that sets out how we identify and manage  
the key risks to which we are exposed and details our capital requirements, capital resources and capital adequacy over the 
planning period.

We produce regular reports on the current and forecasted level of capital, as well as the results of stress scenarios, to the Board and 
the Executive Leadership Team (chaired by the Chief Executive Officer). The key assumptions and risk drivers used to create the 
stress tests are regularly monitored and reported.

We manage capital in accordance with prudential rules issued by the PRA and FCA, in line with the EU Capital Requirements 
Directive. In June 2013 the European Parliament approved new capital reforms (referred to as ‘CRD IV’), which implements Basel III 
in Europe. CRD IV legislation has been effective from 1 January 2014. We are committed to maintaining a strong capital base under 
both existing and future regulatory requirements. During the year we complied with all externally imposed capital requirements to 
which we are subject.

Tier 1 capital

Ordinary share capital
Share premium
Retained earnings
Intangible assets
Deferred tax asset (CET1 element)
Deferred tax liability (CET1 element)
Other reserves

Total regulatory capital

125

2017 
£’000

–
1,303,503
(219,404)
(148,231)
(56,936)
6,167
11,790

2016 
£’000

–
1,027,645
(230,193)
(92,515)
(60,625)
–
7,083

896,889

651,395

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements28. Earnings per share
Basic earnings/(loss) per share is calculated by dividing the earnings/(loss) attributable to ordinary equity holders of Metro Bank by 
the weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue during the year.

Earnings/(loss) attributable to ordinary equity holders of Metro Bank
Weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue – basic (’000)

Basic earnings/(loss) per share (pence)

2017

10,789
84,412

12.8

2016

(16,753)
76,791

(22.0)

Diluted earnings/(loss) per share has been calculated based on the same profit or loss attributable to ordinary equity holders of 
Metro Bank and weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue after the effect of adjustment for potential dilutive ordinary 
shares, which comprise share options granted to colleagues. Potential ordinary shares are treated as dilutive when their conversion 
to ordinary shares results in a reduction in earnings per share. As Metro Bank had a loss attributable to ordinary equity holders of 
Metro Bank in 2016, for this year the share options would be anti-dilutive as they would reduce the loss per share. Therefore, they 
are disregarded in the calculation of dilutive earnings per share. At 31 December 2017 all outstanding share options were considered 
dilutive. Further details of our share options can be found in note 17.

Earnings/(loss) attributable to ordinary equity holders of Metro Bank
Weighted average number of ordinary shares in issue – diluted (’000)

Diluted earnings/(loss) per share (pence)

2017

10,789
85,927

12.6

2016

(16,753)
76,791

(22.0)

There have been no transactions involving ordinary shares or potential ordinary shares between the reporting date and the date of 
the completion of these financial statements which would require the restatement of EPS.

29. Investment in subsidiary undertakings

Accounting 
policy

We apply the acquisition method to account for business combinations. The financial statements of subsidiaries are 
included in the consolidated financial statements from the date that control commences until the date that control 
ceases. Inter-Company transactions and balances are eliminated upon consolidation. All subsidiaries follow the same 
accounting policies as the Group.

The Group had the following subsidiaries at 31 December 2017:

Name

Country of incorporation 
and place of business

Nature of business

Proportion of 
ordinary shares 
directly held by 
the Parent 
(%)

Proportion of 
ordinary shares 
directly held by 
the Group 
(%)

SME Invoice Finance Limited
SME Asset Finance Limited

UK
UK

Invoice financing and factoring
Asset finance

100
–

–
100

All subsidiary undertakings are included in the consolidation. The proportion of the voting rights in the subsidiary undertakings held 
directly by the Parent Company do not differ from the proportion of ordinary shares held.

Transactions between the Company and Group subsidiaries

Interest on inter-Company loan with SME Asset/Invoice Finance
Amounts outstanding as at 31 December owed by SME Asset/Invoice Finance

Details of the registered offices of all our Group companies can be found on page 137.

2017 
£’000

4,083
215,097

2016 
£’000

2,749
143,457

126

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED30. IFRS 9 transitional disclosures
Adoption of IFRS 9
In July 2014, the IASB issued the final version of IFRS 9, Financial Instruments. IFRS 9 is effective for annual periods beginning on or 
after 1 January 2018. It replaces IAS 39, Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement.

We have adopted IFRS 9 with a date of transition of 1 January 2018. This resulted in changes in accounting policies and adjustments 
to the amounts previously recognised in the financial statements. In accordance with the transitional provisions in IFRS 9, 
comparative figures have not been restated.

IFRS 9 sets out new accounting requirements in respect of: classification and measurement of financial instruments, credit 
impairment and hedge accounting. Based on assessments undertaken to date, the total estimated adjustment (net of tax) of the 
adoption of IFRS 9 on the opening balance of the Group’s equity at 1 January 2018 is c.£12.1 million, representing:
•  A decrease of c.£22.7 million relating to impairment requirements
•  An increase of c.£6.8 million relating to classification and measurement requirements
•  An increase of c.£3.8 million relating to deferred tax impacts.

The above assessment is preliminary and our transition work will be finalised during 2018. The actual impact of adopting IFRS 9 on 
1 January 2018 may change as we refine and finalise our expected credit loss (‘ECL’) and related deferred tax calculations.

Classification and measurement of financial instruments
Financial assets
IFRS 9 defines three new measurement categories: 
•  Measured at amortised cost
•  Measured at fair value through other comprehensive income (‘FVOCI’)
•  Measured at fair value through profit or loss (‘FVPL’)

IFRS 9 applies one classification approach for all types of financial assets, including customer lending and treasury assets. Two 
criteria are used to determine how financial assets should be classified and measured: 
(a) Business model: how an entity manages its financial assets in order to generate cash flows by collecting contractual cash flows, 
selling financial assets or both. Factors considered in determining the business model for a group of assets include, for example, 
past experience on how the cash flows for these assets were collected, how their performance is assessed and how their 
managers have compensated; and 

(b) SPPI test: whether contractual cash flows are consistent with a basic lending arrangement; that is whether cash flows solely 

comprise payments of principal and interest (‘SPPI’). 

If assets pass the SPPI test, and are within a business model that holds to collect contractual cash flows, they are measured at 
amortised cost. If assets pass the SPPI test, and are within a business model that holds to collect contractual cash flows and for sale, 
they are measured at FVOCI. If an asset does not meet the criteria for amortised cost of FVOCI, it is measured at FVPL.

Under IFRS 9, assets will only move between categories if there is a significant change to the business model within which they are 
held; this is expected to be infrequent. 

Financial liabilities
All financial liabilities are classified and subsequently measured at amortised cost, except for those designated at fair value through 
profit or loss at initial recognition. Financial liabilities are derecognised when they are extinguished, i.e. when the obligation specified 
in the contract is discharged or cancelled or expires.

Impairment
Under IFRS 9, we assess on a forward-looking basis the expected credit losses (‘ECL’) associated with the assets carried at amortised 
cost and FVOCI and recognises a loss allowance for such losses at each reporting date.

Impairment provisions are driven by changes in credit risk of loans and securities, with a provision for lifetime expected credit losses 
recognised where the risk of default of an instrument has increased significantly. Risk of default and expected credit losses must 
incorporate forward looking and macroeconomic information.

Loans and advances
Sophisticated impairment models have been developed for our retail and commercial loan portfolios, with three core models: 
revolving products; fixed term loans; and mortgages. Expected credit losses must be calculated for drawn loans, and for committed 
lending. 

127

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements30. IFRS 9 transitional disclosures continued
In general terms, the ECL for a loan is calculated using the following formula:
ECL = Probability of default x Loss given default x Exposure at default

Key model inputs and judgements include:
•  Consideration of when a significant increase in credit risk occurs
•  Probability of default, loss given default, and exposure at default
•  Macro economic scenarios to be applied

IFRS 9 requires a higher level of expected credit loss to be recognised for underperforming loans. This is considered based on a 
staging approach:

Stage

Description

ECL recognised

Stage 1 – performing loans

Stage 2 – underperforming loans

Stage 3 – non-performing loans

Financial instruments that have had no 
significant increase in credit risk since 
initial recognition or that have low credit 
risk at the reporting date. 

For example: a newly originated loan on 
which repayments are being received 
and there are no other indicators of a 
significant increase in credit risk.

Financial instruments that have had a 
significant increase in credit risk since 
initial recognition but that do not have 
objective evidence of impairment. 

For example: a loan on which payment 
is 30 days overdue.

Financial assets that have objective 
evidence of impairment at the reporting 
date.

For example: a loan on which payment 
is 90 days overdue or the relationship 
manager has identified significant stress 
which indicates an unwillingness to pay.

12-month expected credit losses

Losses expected on defaults which may 
occur within the next 12 months.

Lifetime expected credit losses

Losses expected on defaults which may 
occur at any point in a loan’s lifetime. 
Losses are adjusted for probability-
weighted macro-economic scenarios.

Lifetime expected credit losses

Losses expected on defaults which may 
occur at any point in a loan’s lifetime. 
Losses are adjusted for probability-
weighted macro-economic scenarios.

Interest income is calculated on the 
carrying amount of the loan net of credit 
allowance.

A significant increase in credit risk may be identified in a number of ways:
•  Qualitative criteria – for example, the borrower is included on the early warning list, or there are clear signs that the customer is 

unwilling to pay.

•  Quantitative criteria – for example, where payments are at least 30 days overdue, or the numerically calculated probability of 
default on a loan has increased significantly since initial recognition, for example due to a movement in the customer’s credit 
score. This is assessed using detailed models.

A loan will be considered to be ‘non-performing’ when it meets the Group’s definition of default – e.g. the loan is 90 days past due, 
or the borrower is considered unlikely to pay.

Probability of default
The probability of default represents the likelihood of a borrower defaulting on its financial obligation either over the next 12 months 
(for Stage 1 accounts), or over the remaining lifetime of the loan (for Stage 2 and 3 accounts). A probability of default is calculated for 
all loans based on historic data and incorporates, but is not limited to:
•  Credit quality scores
•  Lifecycle trends depending on a loan’s vintage
•  Factors indicating the quality of the vintage
•  Characteristics of the current and future economic environment 

The probability of default is adjusted for the weighted average outcome of three macro-economic scenarios: baseline, upside 
and downside. 

128

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED30. IFRS 9 transitional disclosures continued
Loss given default
The loss given default (‘LGD’) represents our expectation of the extent of a loss on a defaulted exposure, and is expressed as a 
percentage considering expected recoveries on defaulted accounts. We apply two LGD rates – one for unsecured lending and one 
for secured lending.
•  LGD rates have been modelled considering a range of inputs, including: value of collateral on secured portfolios – a key driver of 

the expected recovery in the event of default

•  Expected haircut applied to the collateral value to reflect a forced sale discount
•  Expected exposure on a loan at the point of default – models consider a number of factors including the pay down rates on loans
•  Price index forecasts applied to project collateral values into the future
•  Stress factors based on macro-economic scenarios

Exposure at default
This is the amount the we expect to be owed at the point of default. This is subject to judgement since a balance will not 
necessarily remain static between the balance sheet date and the point of expected default. For example:
•  Interest should be accrued
•  Repayments may be received on mortgages
•  For a revolving product, further drawings may be taken between the current point in time and the point of default

Investment securities and other financial assets
Impairment provisions have been calculated based on our best estimate of expected credit losses on other assets classified and 
measured at amortised cost and fair value through other comprehensive income. These include investment securities, cash held at 
banks and other financial assets. Impairment provisions are not material.

Hedge accounting
The new requirements under IFRS 9 align hedge accounting more closely with risk management. The revised standard also 
establishes a more principles-based approach to hedge accounting. IFRS 9 includes an accounting policy choice to remain with IAS 
39 hedge accounting. Hedge accounting is not currently material for us and we have elected to continue applying the requirements 
of IAS 39.

IFRS 9 governance
Responsibility for initial approval of all impairment models has been assigned to a Model Governance Committee. The Credit Risk, 
Policy and Appetite Committee is responsible for review of credit impairment models, including model design and outcomes. The 
Audit Committee is responsible for review and approval of accounting policy.

Impact on adoption
The measurement category and the carrying amount of financial assets and liabilities as at 31 December 2017 in accordance with 
IAS 39 and IFRS 9 are compared as follows.

Class of financial asset or liability

Financial assets
Cash and balances with central banks
Loans and advances to banks
Loans and advances to customers
Investment securities

Financial liabilities
Deposits from banks

Deposits from customers

IAS 39

Measurement
category

Carrying amount
£’000

IFRS 9

Measurement
category

Carrying amount 
£’000

Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables
Held to maturity
Available for sale

£2,111,630 
£100,388 
£9,620,326 
£3,553,801 
£360,704 

Amortised cost
Amortised cost
Amortised cost
Amortised cost
FVOCI

£2,111,610 
£100,388
£9,598,303 
£3,223,188 
£697,451 

Financial liabilities at 
amortised cost
Financial liabilities at 
amortised cost

£11,668,738 

Amortised cost £11,668,738 

£3,320,900 

Amortised cost

£3,320,900 

129

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statements30. IFRS 9 transitional disclosures continued
We have applied the classification requirements in IFRS 9 after performing a detailed analysis of its business models for managing 
financial assets. The Group has considered whether financial assets are held for the collection of principal and interest payments, or 
whether cash flows are expected to be collected from their sale, as well as how the performance of such financial assets is 
assessed. 

The application of the new classification requirements of IFRS 9 led to changes in the classification of certain investment securities 
held by the Bank. £332 million fixed rate securities classified as held to maturity under IAS 39 have been classified as FVOCI under 
IFRS 9. Going forward, this pool of assets will be held to collect cash flows and to sell if required in order to effectively manage our 
interest rate risk, therefore it has been classified as FVOCI. Had IAS 39 remained in force, we would have maintained our intention 
and ability to hold these assets to maturity, and we would have sought other methods to manage our interest rate risk.

Reconciliation of balance sheet balances from IAS 39 to IFRS 9
The following table reconciles the carrying amount of financial assets and liabilities, from their previous measurement category in 
accordance with IAS 39 to their new measurement categories upon transition to IFRS 9 on 1 January 2018.

Financial assets measured at amortised cost under IFRS 9

£’000

Cash and 
balances with 
central banks
(IAS 39: Loans and 
receivables)

Loans and 
advances to 
banks
(IAS 39: Loans and 
receivables)

Loans and 
advances to 
customers
(IAS 39: Loans and 
receivables)

Investment 
securities
(IAS 39: Held to 
maturity)

Total 

Carrying value under IAS 39 – amortised cost

2,111,630

100,388 

9,620,326

3,553,801

15,386,144

Transfer to FVOCI
– Carrying amount transferred
Remeasurement of amortised cost
Remeasurement of impairment allowance

–
–
(20)

–
–
–

–
–
(22,023)

(332,326)
2,089
(376)

(332,326)
2,089
(22,419)

Carrying value under IFRS 9 – amortised cost

2,111,610

100,388 

9,598,303

3,223,188

15,033,488

Remeasurement of amortised cost – this relates to assets which were initially classified as available for sale under IAS 39. They were 
subsequently transferred to the held to maturity category, with the carrying value at the point of transfer being equal to the fair 
value. This adjustment restates the carrying value of these assets to reflect the appropriate amortised cost as if the assets had always 
been measured at amortised cost. 

The total amount of remeasurement of £14.8 million was adjusted to change to equity on 1 January 2018. A corresponding increase 
in deferred tax assets of approximately £3.5 million was also adjusted through change to equity on 1 January 2018. 

Financial assets measured at FVOCI under IFRS 9

£’000

Carrying value under IAS 39 – FVOCI

Transfer from amortised cost
– Carrying amount transferred
– Remeasurment from amortised cost to fair value
Remeasurement of impairment allowance

Carrying value under IFRS 9 – FVOCI

Investment 
securities
(IAS39: Available 
for sale)

Total

360,704

360,704

332,326
4,678
(257)

697,451

332,326
4,678
(257)

697,451

The total amount of remeasurement of £4.4 million was adjusted to change to equity on 1 January 2018. A corresponding decrease 
in deferred tax assets of approximately £1.1 million was also adjusted through change to equity on 1 January 2018.

130

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTINUED30. IFRS 9 transitional disclosures continued
Reconciliation of impairment allowance balance from IAS 39 to IFRS 9
The following table reconciles the previous impairment allowance measured in accordance with the IAS 39 incurred loss model and 
the new impairment allowance measured in accordance with the IFRS 9 expected loss model at 1 January 2018:

Measurement category (IAS 39/IFRS 9)

Loans and receivables/Financial assets at amortised cost
Available-for-sale financial instruments/Financial assets at FVOCI

Total

Loan loss 
allowance under 
IAS 39/Provision 
under IAS 37

14,361
–

14,361

Reclassification

Remeasurement

–
–

–

22,399
257

22,656

Loan loss 
allowance under 
IFRS 9

36,760
257

37,017

The increase in loss allowance estimated under IFRS 9 when compared to that measured under IAS 39 is primarily due to earlier 
recognition of credit losses under the new expected loss model. The most significant impact has been observed in relation to our 
unsecured lending portfolios, a number of which are no longer being originated. We continue to refine, monitor and validate 
certain elements of the impairment models underpinning the estimates provided above. We expect some additional volatility in 
impairment charges under IFRS 9 when compared to the current IAS 39 impairment model due to the forward looking nature of 
expected credit losses.

The European Banking Authority has amended the Capital Requirements Regulation to establish IFRS 9 related transitional 
arrangements. On adoption of IFRS 9, movements in the opening impairment provision will be posted as an adjustment to reserves, 
and therefore to capital. The transitional arrangement enables firms to ‘add back’ a portion of this capital adjustment in early years, 
thereby reducing the initial impact on capital. Add-back adjustments are also allowable for movements in provisions in subsequent 
years. Metro Bank has elected to adopt the transitional arrangements.

31. Post balance sheet events
On 23 February 2018, we announced the intention to purchase a portfolio of residential mortgages for £523 million. The purchase 
is expected to complete in March 2018.

131

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsADDITIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING

Country-by-Country Reporting
The Capital Requirements Regulations (Country-by-Country Reporting (‘CBCR’)) came into effect on 1 January 2014 and place 
certain reporting obligations on financial institutions that are within the scope of the EU Capital Requirements Directive IV (‘CRD IV’).

The objective of the CBCR requirement is to improve transparency and provide a requirement for institutions in scope to disclose, 
on a country-by-country basis, information on their activities, turnover, employees, profits and corporate taxes.

Metro Bank and its subsidiaries only operate with the United Kingdom (“UK”) and are all UK registered entities. The Parent Company, 
Metro Bank, is a credit institution for the purposes of CRD IV and is therefore within the scope of CBCR. Our activities are disclosed 
within note 1 to the financial statements.

For the purposes of CBCR, the appropriate disclosures required are summarised below:

Number of employees (average full-time equivalent)
Turnover (£’000)
Profit before tax (£’000)
Income tax credit (£’000)
Corporation tax paid (£’000)

No public subsidies were received during the year.

UK

2,831
293,752
18,675
(7,886)
881

132

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ REPORT TO THE DIRECTORS OF  
METRO BANK PLC ON COUNTRY-BY-COUNTRY INFORMATION

We have audited the country by country information in the relevant note to the financial statements of Metro Bank PLC for the year 
ended 31 December 2017 (“the schedule”). The schedule has been prepared by the directors based on the requirements of the 
Capital Requirements (Country-by-Country Reporting) Regulations 2013.

Directors’ responsibility for the schedule
The directors are responsible for the preparation of the schedule in accordance with the Capital Requirements (Country-by-Country 
Reporting) Regulations 2013, for the appropriateness of the basis of preparation and the interpretation of the Regulations as they 
affect the preparation of the schedule, and for such internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable the 
preparation of the schedule that is free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditors’ responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the schedule based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with 
International Standards on Auditing. Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the 
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the schedule is free from material misstatement. 

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the schedule. The 
procedures selected depend on the auditors’ judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the 
schedule, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the 
entity’s preparation of the schedule in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the 
purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the 
appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as 
evaluating the overall presentation of the schedule.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion. 

Opinion
In our opinion, the country-by-country information in the schedule as at 31 December 2017 is prepared, in all material respects, in 
accordance with the requirements of the Capital Requirements (Country-by-Country Reporting) Regulations 2013.

Basis of preparation and restriction on distribution
Without modifying our opinion, we draw attention to the relevant note to the schedule, which describes the basis of preparation. 
The schedule is prepared to assist the directors to meet the requirements of the Capital Requirements (Country-by-Country 
Reporting) Regulations 2013. As a result, the schedule may not be suitable for another purpose. 

Our report is intended solely for the benefit of the directors of Metro Bank PLC. We do not accept or assume any responsibility or 
liability to any other party save where terms are agreed between us in writing.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Chartered Accountants
London
1 March 2018

133

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsALTERNATIVE PERFORMANCE MEASURES

In the reporting of financial information, we use certain measures that are not required under IFRS, the Generally Accepted 
Accounting Principles (‘GAAP’) under which we report. These measures are consistent with those used by management to 
assess underlying performance. In addition, a number of non-IFRS metrics are calculated which are commonly used within the 
banking industry.

These alternative performance measures have been defined below: 

Cost of risk

Impairment charges net of debt recoveries divided by simple average gross loans for the year.

Credit impairment charges
Average gross lending

Cost of risk

2017
£’000

2016
£’000

8,223
7,587,101

4,706
4,657,507

0.11%

0.10%

Cost of deposits

Interest expense (excluding interest on FLS, TFS and repos) divided by the average deposits from 
customers for the year.

Interest expense 
Interest on FLS, TFS and repos
Customer interest expense

Average deposits from customers

Cost of deposits

2017
£’000

60,694
(8,095)
52,599

2016
£’000

59,246
(7,282)
51,964

9,784,616

6,564,225

0.54%

0.79%

Loan-to-deposit ratio

Loans and advances to customers expressed as a percentage of total deposits. It is a commonly used 
ratio within the banking industry to assess liquidity.

Loans and advances to customers
Deposits from customers

Loan-to-deposit ratio

Net interest margin  
(‘NIM’)

Net interest income as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.

Net interest income 
Average interest-earning assets

Net interest margin (‘NIM’)

2017
£’000

2016
£’000

9,620,326
11,668,738

5,865,370
7,950,579

82%

2017
£’000

74%

2016
£’000

240,982
12,466,407

154,240
7,844,048

1.93%

1.97%

134

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Customer deposit net 
interest margin 
(‘Customer NIM’)

Reflecting the interest return from the investment of our customer deposits.

Net interest income
Adjustments for customer net interest income:
Plus interest expense on Term Funding Scheme (‘TFS’)
Plus interest expense on repurchase agreements
Less interest income on investment securities
Plus return on deposits not lent*

Net customer interest income

Average deposits from customers 

Customer net interest margin (‘Customer NIM’)

2017
£’000

2016
£’000

240,982

154,240

5,437
1,554
(56,873)
23,669

214,769

187 
4,900 
(46,528) 
27,019 

139,818

9,784,616

6,564,225

2.19%

2.13%

* Calculated as treasury liquidity yield x (average customer deposits less average loans)

Underlying profit/(loss) 
before tax

Underlying profit/(loss) before tax represents an adjusted measure, excluding the effect of certain items 
that are considered to distort year-on-year comparisons in order to provide readers with a better and 
more relevant understanding of the underlying trends in the business. A reconciliation from statutory 
profit/(loss) before tax to underlying profit/(loss) before tax is set out below.

Where underlying profit/(loss) before tax is reported for a quarter, the underlying profit/(loss) before tax 
also excludes the impact of the FSCS levy due to the timings of this charge.

Statutory profit/(loss) before tax
Add back:
Costs associated with listing
Listing Share Awards
Costs relating to RBS alternative remedies package application

Impairment of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets

2017
£’000

2016
£’000

18,675

(17,198)

–
1,376
129

639

1,841
3,296
–

315

Underlying profit/(loss) before tax

20,819

(11,746)

Underlying earnings per 
share (basic and diluted)

Underlying profit/(loss) divided by the weighted average number of basic/diluted shareholders as 
disclosed in note 28.

We also disclose a number of capital and liquidity metrics which are required by the PRA and FCA. The basis of calculation of those 
metrics is defined within the relevant legislation.

135

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsGLOSSARY

Application 
programming 
interface (‘API’)

The protocols, routines, functions and/or commands that programmers use to develop software or 
facilitate interaction between distinct systems.

Common equity tier 1 
capital (‘CET1’)

The highest quality form of regulatory capital under CRD IV that comprises common shares issued and 
related share premium, retained earnings and other reserves less specified regulatory adjustments. A 
breakdown of our CET1 capital can be found in note 27.

Debt-to-value ratio 
(‘DTV’)

The ratio of the gross outstanding amount to the indexed value of the collateral. The last indexing was 
performed in H1 2017. The gross amounts exclude any impairment allowance. 

Encumbered assets

Assets recognised on the balance sheet which have been pledged as collateral against an existing liability, 
and as a result are assets which are unavailable for us to secure funding or be sold to reduce potential 
future funding requirements.

Forbearance

Forbearance takes place when a concession is made on the contractual terms of a loan in response to an 
obligor’s financial difficulties.

Internal Capital 
Adequacy Assessment 
Process (‘ICAAP’)

Internal Ratings-Based 
approach (‘IRB’)

Loss given default 
(‘LGD’)

Net Promoter Score 
(‘NPS’)

Partially Exemption 
Special Method 
(‘PESM’)

Regulatory leverage 
ratio

Our own assessment, based on Basel II requirements, of the levels of capital that we need to hold in 
respect of our regulatory capital requirements.

A methodology of estimating the credit risk within a portfolio by utilising internal risk parameters to 
calculate credit risk regulatory capital requirements. There are two approaches to IRB: Foundation IRB 
and Advanced IRB.

The estimated loss which will arise if a customer defaults.

A standard loyalty metric which is calculated based on customers providing a rating on a 0 to 10 scale. 
Those who respond with a score of 9 to 10 are labelled ‘promoters’, 0 to 6 labelled ‘detractors’ and 7 or 8 
labelled ‘passives’. The NPS is then calculated by taking the percentage of respondents classified as 
detractors away from those identified as promoters.

NPS can be as low as −100 (everybody is a detractor) or as high as +100 (everybody is a promoter).

A special method is a calculation agreed with HMRC which is different to their standard method. It 
enables us to calculate how much input value added tax (“VAT”) we may recover. 

The ratio of our common equity tier 1 capital (see above) compared to our total assets. 

Risk weighted assets 
(‘RWA’)

A measure of our assets adjusted for their associated risk. Risk weightings are applied in accordance with 
the Basel Capital Accord as implemented by the Prudential Regulation Authority (‘PRA’)

Term funding scheme 
(‘TFS’)

A scheme implemented by the Bank of England which provides funding to banks and building societies at 
rates close to Base Rate. It is designed to encourage lenders to reflect cuts in Base Rate in the interest 
rates faced by households and businesses.

136

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

Annual General Meeting
The Company’s next Annual General Meeting will take place 
on 24 April 2018 at the Bank’s registered office address at 
One Southampton Row, London WC1B 5HA, at 2:00pm. The 
Chairmen of each of the Board’s Committees will be present to 
answer questions put to them by shareholders. The Annual 
Report and Accounts and Notice of the Annual General Meeting 
will be sent to shareholders at least 20 working days prior to the 
date of the meeting.

The Annual General Meeting gives shareholders an opportunity 
to hear about the general development of the business and 
to ask questions of the Chairman and the Chairmen of the 
various Committees.

Foreward looking statements
This annual report contains statements that are, or may be 
deemed to be, forward-looking statements. Forward-looking 
statements typically use terms such as ‘believes’, ‘projects’, 
‘anticipates’, ‘expects’, ‘intends’, ‘plans’, ‘may’, ‘will’, ‘would’, ‘could’ 
or ‘should’ or similar terminology. Any forward-looking 
statements in this annual report are based on the Company’s 
current expectations and, by their nature, forward-looking 
statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, 
many of which are beyond the Company’s control, that could 
cause the Company’s actual results and performance to differ 
materially from any expected future results or performance 
expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. As a 
result, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such 
forward-looking statements. Past performance should not be 
taken as an indication or guarantee of future results, and no 
representation or warranty, expressed or implied, is made 
regarding future performance.

No assurances can be given that the forward-looking 
statements in this annual report will be realised. The Company 
undertakes no obligation to release the results of any revisions 
to any forward-looking statements in this annual report that may 
occur due to any change in its expectations or to reflect events 
or circumstances after the date of this announcement and the 
Company disclaims any such obligation.

Registered and other offices
The Company’s registered office and head office is:
One Southampton Row 
London
WC1B 5HA
Telephone: 0345 08 08 500/0345 08 08 508
Website: www.metrobankonline.co.uk

Other subsidiaries of the Company are also registered at the 
same registered office and head office of the Company.

Registrars
The Company has appointed Equiniti Limited to maintain its 
register of members. Shareholders should contact Equiniti using 
the details below in relation to all general enquiries concerning 
their shareholding:

Equiniti Limited*
Aspect House
Spencer Road
Lancing, West Sussex BN99 6DA
Telephone: 0371 384 2030**
International callers: +44 121 415 7047

*  Equiniti Limited and Equiniti Financial Services Limited are part of the Equiniti 
group of companies. Company share registration, employee scheme and 
pension administration services are provided through Equiniti Limited, which is 
registered in England and Wales with No. 6226088. Investment and general 
insurance services are provided through Equiniti Financial Services Limited, 
which is registered in England and Wales with No. 6208699 and is authorised 
and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority.

**  Lines are open from 8.30 to 5.30pm (UK time) Monday to Friday, excluding 

public holidays in England and Wales.

2018 Financial Calendar
Annual General Meeting – 24 April 2018
First quarter results – 25 April 2018
Half year results – 25 July 2018
Third quarter results – 24 October 2018

Unsolicited mail
The Company is required by law to make its share register 
available on request to unconnected organisations. As a 
consequence, shareholders may receive unsolicited mail, 
including mail from unauthorised investment firms. If you wish 
to limit the amount of unsolicited mail received, please contact 
the Mailing Preference Service, an independent organisation 
whose services are free for consumers.

Further details can be obtained from:
Mailing Preference Service
MPS Freepost LON 20771
London 
W1E 0ZT
Website: www.mpsonline.org.uk

137

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsSHAREHOLDER INFORMATION CONTINUED

Shareholder profile by size of holding as at 31 December 2017

Range

1–1,000
1,001–5,000
5,001–10,000
10,001–50,000
50,001–100,000
100,001–500,000
500,001–1,000,000
1,000,001 and above

Totals

Shareholder profile by category as at 31 December 2017

Category

Private shareholders
Banks
Nominees and other institutional investors

Totals

Total 
number of 
holdings

156
95
50
108
25
42
10
15

501

Percentage 
of holders

31.14%
18.96%
9.98%
21.56%
4.99%
8.38%
2.00%
2.99%

Total number
of shares held at 
31 December 2017

50,718
238,816
379,701
2,461,591
1,834,821
8,473,487
7,092,387
67,944,327

Percentage 
of total

0.06%
0.27%
0.43%
2.78%
2.07%
9.58%
8.02%
76.79%

100.00%

88,475,848

100.00%

Number of 
holders

Percentage of 
holders within 
type

133
3
365

501

26.55%
0.60%
72.85%

Shares held at  

31 December 2017

5,073,742
12,772
83,389,334

Percentage of 
issued share 
capital

5.74%
0.01%
94.25%

100.00%

88,475,848

100.00%

It should be noted that many private investors hold their shares through nominee companies and therefore the percentage of 
shares held by private shareholders may be higher than that shown.

138

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  NOTES

139

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  Strategic reportGovernanceFinancial statementsNOTES

140

ANNUAL REPORT AND ACCOUNTS 2017METRO BANK PLC  M

E

T

R

O

B

A

N

K

P

L

C

A

N

N

U

A

L

R

E

P

O

R

T

A

N

D

A

C

C

O

U

N

T

S

2

0

1

7

METRO BANK PLC

www.metrobankonline.co.uk