Contents Overview Vision of leadership Market overview A vertical integration business model At a glance Chairman’s statement Chief executive’s review Financial and operational highlights Business review Poultry Grain Other agricultural operations Risk management Corporate responsibility Financial review Management & governance Board of directors Corporate governance Directors’ report Financial statements & notes Statement of Board of Directors’ responsibilities Independent auditors’ report Consolidated balance sheet Consolidated statement of comprehensive income Consolidated statement of changes in shareholders’ equity Consolidated statement of cash flow Notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements Other information Corporate information 01 02 04 06 08 10 13 14 20 22 24 26 29 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 44 80 MHP (Myronivsky Hliboproduct) is Ukraine’s leading producer of poultry and poultry products. We command around 50% share of the market for industrially-produced chicken while our “Nasha Riaba” brand leads the market for chilled-chicken products. Being one of Ukraine’s leading agro-industrial companies, we also produce a number of national and regional brands of processed meat. We are a truly vertically-integrated enterprise owning and operating each stage in the chicken-production process, from growing grain to producing feed, and from hatching eggs to distribution and sales. Taking into account Ukraine’s market potential, the Company is expanding its poultry production capacities with the Vinnytsia poultry farm, coming on-stream at the beginning of 2013. During 2010 the Company continued to execute its stated strategy of gradually increasing its land bank and at the end of the period it had around 280,000 hectares of land under control. Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Vision of leadership 01 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information We are increasing our capacity >> Ukrainian demand for high quality processed chicken meat is growing strongly. Since the 1990s MHP’s share of the industrially produced chicken market has grown to around 50% of an expanding market. In that period, per capita income in Ukraine grew rapidly, fuelling a rise in demand for high quality products. We have extensively grown the business and increased capacity in order to meet this rise in demand – and to move towards our ambition to become Europe’s premier poultry producer. In 2010 the Myronivka poultry farm successfully achieved its fi rst full year at full capacity, reaching the production target of 220,000 tonnes. The Vinnytsia complex, now under construction, will add a further 440,000 tonnes when complete. Our retail outlet network is expanding, too. Today, MHP is one of the biggest producers in Europe. Tomorrow, we will be signifi cantly larger. Poultry Land Meat processing products +26%Percentage increase 2009-2010 +56%Overall percentage increase 2009-2010 +34%Percentage increase 2009-2010 Volumes, tonnes Hectares under control Volumes, tonnes 2010 2009 2008 360,000 2010 280,000 2010 32,900 285,000 225,000 2009 2008 180,000 180,000 2009 2008 16,000 24,600 02 Market overview Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Leaders in our markets >> MHP enjoys a leading position in the markets it competes in – and the Company is growing all the time. What are the key factors lying behind this success? Simply that, through constant innovation and development, we offer consumers an ever widening range of attractive, nutritional poultry and meat products of consistently premium quality at prices which represent value for money. Today, MHP is Ukraine’s most successful agricultural business. Over the past 12 years, a multi-million dollar investment programme, a clear business strategy, a professional management team and a highly trained, dedicated workforce has created a company which not only dominates its markets, but is a considerable asset in the economic development of Ukraine. So, shoppers can buy with confi dence every time. Not rocket science, perhaps, but a company’s ability to provide these things day in, day out over the long term depends on its underlying structures to enable it to go on providing the products people want to buy for their families. Key Market Drivers Since the Company was founded in 1998, the key driver for growth has been the rapid increase in demand for meat products in the Ukrainian domestic market. Since the 1990’s, the market was overloaded with imported frozen chicken meat while, at the same time, domestic production was underdeveloped. Data for this period on meat consumption in Ukraine demonstrates that it is generally lower than the European average; nevertheless, consumption has increased by an impressive 53% over the past seven years and shows, driven by poultry, every sign on continuing to grow. Interestingly, overall meat consumption per capita in Ukraine is still lower than the European and Russian average and below biological norm. In the future and now, only chicken has a great potential for overall meat consumption growth. Two principal factors lie behind this; fi rstly, production of chicken is industrialised compared to other kinds of meat production and, secondly, one of the lowest levels of per capita income in Ukraine makes poultry the cheapest source of protein and the most affordable meat option for consumers. MHP has seized this opportunity to present its range of modern, high quality products to eager families the length and breadth of the country. Imported Meat ’000 tonnes 2010 155 2009 193 2008 256 2007 131 194 349 14% 150 343 18% 198 454 24% 71 202 16% Poultry Other meat Import as % of total poultry supply Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Industrially produced meat in Ukraine, 2009-2010 Percentage of total domestic meat production 100 80 60 40 20 0 % 2 3 % 9 2 % 5 2 % 4 2 % 2 3 % 3 3 % 9 3 % 2 4 % 6 7 % 9 7 % 0 8 % 0 8 Beef Pork Poultry 2007 2008 2009 2010 MHP’s market share is growing year on year. From entering the market, in just under ten years, by 2009, it had grown to 43% of a signifi cantly enlarged market. In 2010, we achieved the milestone of capturing over half the market around 50% – whilst other manufacturers in the sector remained relatively static or left the market altogether. Vertical Integration guarantees Quality and Value-for-Money Fundamental to our market dominance is our tried and tested vertically integrated business model which makes us almost entirely self-suffi cient. By growing or rearing all the raw materials we need, carrying out all meat processing on our own sites and distributing the end products through our own distribution and retail networks, we can control production costs, guarantee quality levels and maintain value for money at every stage from farm to fork. And, by controlling costs, we also ensure that our margins are one of the highest in the business, another foundation to long term growth. 03 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information By its very nature, poultry is the easiest meat to use in modern technological processing and production. It currently represents almost 50% of all meat consumed by Ukrainians, something further explained by the fact that beef and pork production remains relatively underdeveloped in Ukraine and such products are signifi cantly more expensive than poultry. The Right Products We are proud of our reputation for excellence – a reputation we have worked hard to achieve and are determined to maintain. Market surveys demonstrate that our brand names are amongst the most recognised and trusted in Ukraine. But we do not take people for granted: we continually seek to improve our products where we can, and to regularly introduce new lines designed to appeal to the end buyer. Our aim is to earn and maintain the respect and trust of consumers. In addition to the consistent levels of quality at the right prices referred to above, that also means offering them a wide range of attractive, nutritious, easy-to-cook food products which fi t in with modern lifestyles. This is particularly true as general economic conditions improve in Ukraine and employment levels rise leaving the typical family with rather less time to prepare meals. The Right Retailing Balance The demand is overwhelmingly high for fresh meat products sold in local shops which consumers can visit several times per week. 40% of our products are sold through a network of around 2,600 “Nasha Riaba” branded franchise stores. Over the next few years, we intend to expand the number and quality of these bright, highly popular stores which play an important role in maintaining our market leadership. Industrial poultry production in Ukraine Ukraine poultry market share evolution 2010 2009 2008 ‘000 tonnes processed weight 2010 1 2 3 4 5 2010 772 2009 712 2008 632 2009 1 2 3 4 5 1. MHP 2. Agromars 3. Dniprovski 4. Volynska 5. Others 1. MHP 2. Agromars 3. Dniprovski 4. Ruby Rose 5. Others 49% 16% 7% 3% 25% 43% 18% 7% 4% 28% 04 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 A vertical integration business model >> >> >> >> >> Grain Sunfl ower Protein Fodder Sunfl ower Husks Hatching Eggs Own grain production satisfi es 100% of the Company’s corn and 15% of sunfl ower needs Replace of expensive imported soybean meal by own produced protein from sunfl ower seeds 280,000 hectares of land under control 576,000 tonnes of sunfl ower seeds (about 200.000 tonnes of sunfl ower oil) 100% self-suffi cient in fodder Effi cient operations – waste recycling 100% self-suffi cient in hatching eggs Own grain storage facilities 3 fodder mills – more than 1 million tonnes fodder Grain storage facilities 735,000 m3 Increased self-suffi ciency in energy supplies to ensure lower costs 2 breeder farms, 254 million hatching eggs per year Further increase of land bank as per Company’s plan 540,000 tonnes of sunfl ower seeds 550,000 tonnes fodder per year Biomass heating facility recycles waste 160 million hatching eggs per year Grain storage facilities 920.000 m3 Existing capacities: 360.000 tonnes of chicken meat Future capacities: Vinnytsia project (Phase 1 = 220,000 tonnes of chicken meat) A high degree of vertical integration >> Robust business model of vertical integration – our poultry business is substantially supported by the grain growing segment Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 05 >> >> >> >> >> Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information Poultry Processing Plants 100% of poultry grow out and processed at own facilities Convenience food, processed meat and sausages Growing share of processed meat and sausages Distribution Retail 100% of poultry delivered to customers within 12 hours by dedicated fl eet 2,600 dedicated outlets 4 broiler farms, 360,000 tones of chicken meat per year Fully automated processing plants, 3.6 million chickens per week Over 60,000 tonnes of convenience foods, sausages and cooked meat per year Fleet of more than 450 vehicles 40% of poultry is sold via franchise network 12 broiler zones, 220,000 tones of chicken meat per year 2 lines, each 12,000 heads per hour Further capacity for meat processing and production increase of convenience food. Plus more than 200 new vehicles Plus more than 1,500 new outlets BioSecurity – towards best practice Biosecurity is a top priority right across our operations. We employ a range of stringent measures at all our facilities designed to minimise the risk and transmission of disease. All chickens are reared in indoor barns to EU standards, access to our facilities is strictly controlled, employees and vehicles are disinfected before entering production areas and a team of 200 vets constantly monitors the health of the fl ocks. Units at each breeding and rearing farm are at least 1km apart – and individual barns are approximately 50 metres apart – to prevent any spread of disease. All barns are thoroughly cleaned to international standards before a new generation of chickens is introduced. Birds of different generations are not mixed together. We operate a highly effective traceability system, enabling us to maintain the quality of our products by tracking the production process from start to fi nish by linking every batch of chickens to its original facility. The majority of our sites complies with the most stringent current international standards, having both ISO9001 (Quality Management System) and ISO22000 (Food Safety Management System) certifi cation. In addition to ISO22000, the Druzhba Narodiv Nova plant has HACCP (Hazard Analysis & Critical Control Point) certifi cation. We have made good progress with this rolling programme over the past 5 years. Our goal is to continue certifying the rest of our enterprises to the above standards by 2012 and after. Further progress was made during 2010 with the certifi cation of the Snyatynska, MFC, Katerynopilsky and Myronivka plants. 06 At a glance Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Product portfolio >> Poultry and poultry related operations Sales in 2010 UAH6,349m US$800m Key products and brands — Chilled chicken, whole or in portions — Frozen chicken, whole or in portions — Pre-cooked convenience food — Sunfl ower oil Grain growing operations Sales in 2010 UAH282.2m US$35.6m Key products — Corn — Sunfl owers — Wheat — Rape Other agricultural operations Sales in 2010 UAH859.3m US$108.3m Key products and brands — Sausages — Cooked meat — Premium fresh beef — Foie gras — Goose meat — Fruit — Milk Nasha Riaba Under this fl agship brand, which dominates the market, we sell a wide range of chilled chicken products Lehko! A vast range of innovative convenience food Total land bank 280,000 hectares by end of 2010 Druzhba Narodiv 93 types of pork and beef sausages, frankfurters, smoked and semi-smoked sausages and ham Foie Gras A range of goose and foie gras products – sold chilled or frozen – produced at our Snyatynska complex Baschinsky A wide range of 40 products, from smoked poultry to pate and from high-quality pork to stuffed pancakes; 23 new products were introduced during the year Certifi ed Angus Premium fresh beef from Aberdeen-Angus cattle, 36 types bred on our Druzhba farm Europroduct Our value brand of sausages and cooked meats: 20 types of product Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 STRATEGY Expanding our poultry business by: — strengthening on our leading market position — constructing new poultry complexes — increasing and diversifying exports STRATEGY Furthering the profi tability of our grain business by: — increasing effi ciency through the application of modern farming techniques — further increasing our land bank in forthcoming years to grow more crops for feed — maintaining our above-average crop yields — increasing exports of grain 07 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information A self-suffi cient business model which gives us control over all aspects of our operations “from farm to fork”. Vertical integration reduces MHP’s dependence on suppliers and its exposure to risks such as fl uctuations in raw material prices. KEY FACTS 254 million hatching eggs produced in 2010 at two breeder farms 192 million birds grown in 2010 at four poultry farms 360,000 tonnes of chicken produced 1,100 million tonnes of fodder produced at three mills 11 distribution centres 450 refrigerated trucks KEY FACTS 8 arable farms 735,000 cubic metres of grain-storage capacity 913,000 tonnes of crops harvested from land that was under control at the beginning of 2010 (180,000 hectares including 150,000 hectares grain growing) 2,600 branded franchise outlets 21,000 tonnes of convenience food produced Self-suffi cient MHP grows the majority of its own feed ingredients Sunfl ower oil New sunfl ower-seed crushing plant opened at Katerynopilsky in September 2009 195,800 tonnes of sunfl ower oil sold (2009: 140,400 tonnes) Fertile land Ukraine’s “black earth” land is extremely fertile Crop rotation We rotate crops to protect the quality of the land Excellent climate With a benefi cial mixture of sun and rain, Ukraine’s climate is perfect for growing arable crops. STRATEGY KEY FACTS Maintaining our leadership in the meat- processing industry by: — increasing production of sausages and cooked meat — meeting consumer demand on prices — shifting our product range to mass- market products 34% increase in sales of sausages and cooked meat in 2010 “Foie Gras” One farm is dedicated to producing geese for our “Foie Gras” brand Fruit One fruit farm primarily grows apples, but also several other types of fruit 2 meat-processing plants 1 mixed farm – rears cattle and pigs and grows crops “Certifi ed Angus” The mixed farm also rears cattle for our “Certifi ed Angus” brand 08 Chairman’s statement Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Growth >> 2010 was a year in which we successfully reaped the rewards for strategic growth decisions taken in recent years and laid the foundations for further expansion in the period ahead. I am delighted to report on another year of signifi cant progress for MHP. Already one of Europe’s leading producers of chicken meat, MHP is working at 100% of capacity and now holds approximately 50% of the rapidly growing domestic Ukrainian market for industrially produced meat products. The Myronivka chicken farm, which reached full production on schedule in mid 2009, successfully met its fi rst full year production targets. In addition, construction of the Vinnytsia poultry complex started on what, over the next fi ve years or so, will become one of the world’s most advanced chicken processing facilities. During the year, a number of export licences were granted and we are confi dent of receiving EU export certifi cation in the near term which would support the sustained, long-term expansion of the Company. Results 2010 saw a return to economic stability and GDP growth in Ukraine. The successful placement of our new Eurobond issue in April and an increase in the free fl oat in December clearly demonstrated market confi dence in a steadily growing business underpinned by a robust, vertically-integrated business model which left the Company largely unscathed by the recent macro-economic uncertainties in Ukraine. Financials I am pleased to confi rm that full year results are in line with expectations. Adjusted EBITDA of US$325 million in 2010 was achieved compared with US$271 million in 2009, a 20% increase. Revenue grew by 33% to US$944 million from last year’s US$711 million. The Market Chicken represents a cheaper and healthier source of protein than beef and pork. Consumers know it and have come, more and more, to trust the brand names within the MHP range for their dependable quality and value for money. Through its broad range of modern, family- friendly products, MHP has essentially driven the market for high quality, value-for-money chicken products in Ukraine. As economic confi dence has returned, so sales of our more specialised, value-added convenience foods have grown, whilst demand for our wide range of sausages and cooked meats led to a 34% increase in production over 2009 fi gures to 32,900 tonnes. “ MHP is serving a large, attractive and growing market.” Charles E Adriaenssen Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 09 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information Operations Our robust, vertically-integrated business model aims at maximising our self-suffi ciency with most crops. With open-market commodity prices rising dramatically in 2010, MHP’s self-suffi ciency model confi rmed its worth during the year. With the increase in output brought about by the Myronivka and forthcoming Vinnytsia facilities, we have acquired further strategic landholdings which not only increase our vertical integration but will expand our grain sales. It also gives us increased protection from fl uctuating grain prices and a distinct competitive advantage. Compared to both Ukrainian domestic and international producers, we have one of the lowest poultry production costs. We are particularly proud of the way our new Myronivka plant performed during its fi rst full year at full capacity, meeting its production targets without any signifi cant operational problems. This is testament to the maturity and effi ciency of the organisation and our staff, and bodes well for Vinnytsia as it comes progressively on-stream in the coming years. Corporate Governance MHP is registered in Luxembourg and complies with that country’s voluntary corporate governance regime. Three of our seven directors, including myself, are independent non-executives. We have improved the quality of information to Board members and have increased the frequency of the visits we make to our production sites and retail outlets. Risks The Company rigorously controls exposure to risk. The programme of investment in new capacity at Vinnytsia is split into two phases, allowing expenditure to be tailored to cash-fl ow and credit availability. Receipts of foreign currency from the sale of sunfl ower oil, crops and poultry – around US$240 million in 2010 – provide the Company with a natural hedge against exchange rate fl uctuations. People MHP continues to be one of the largest employers in Ukraine’s agricultural sector. We employ highly trained and motivated people, led by a sector-leading senior management team committed to driving the business forward. On behalf of the Board, I express our thanks to them all for their contribution to our continuing success. Outlook Having withstood the challenging times of 2009, in 2010 we improved our market domination in the grain growing, chicken and processed meat sectors and ensured the Company remained in sound fi nancial health. With a new major production facility at Vinnytsia coming on-stream from 2013, we will increasingly be able to satisfy growing domestic demand in Ukraine. Through its vertical integration, effective cost management and modern, highly effi cient production facilities, MHP is fast becoming a world leader in the cost-effi cient delivery of high quality, high demand food products. With the foundations for further expansion already being laid and the near-term prospects of increasing export opportunities, we can look to the period ahead with confi dence with a new production facility coming on-stream in 2013, we will more and more satisfy growing domestic demand. 50% Industrial chicken production market share Consumers to trust the brand names within the MHP range. Revenue US$ 944m Our business model aims at maximising self-suffi ciency, we have one of the lowest poultry production costs. 10 Chief Executive’s review Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Capacity >> I am pleased to report on a year which saw MHP once again deliver on promises made. In 2010 the Company performed strongly, both operationally and fi nancially, meeting all the production and monetary targets we had set ourselves. We also achieved signifi cant operational expansion across our three business streams. This performance refl ects the strength of our uniquely self-suffi cient business model and puts us in a strong position to continue delivering against our targets in the period ahead. Our objective is to carry on expanding and strengthening our leading position, and achieve sector leading results by focusing on doing what we do best – producing and marketing a range of popular, dependable, high quality, value-added food products. 2010 – Delivering on our Promises In addition to meeting our profi tability and production increase targets, a number of other key achievements during 2010 are worthy of highlight: they demonstrate the underlying strength of the Company and the progress we continue to make as we emerge from a period of challenging economic conditions. In particular, the success we have had in capturing an ever increasing share of the growing Ukrainian market for industrially produced chicken. By any standards, a market share of around 50% is a clear refl ection of the quality of our products and represents a major advance since 2000 when we had just 5% of the (much smaller) market. In April 2010 we re-fi nanced our Eurobond 2011 and issued a new one. In addition, the Myronivka poultry farm successfully achieved its fi rst entire year at the full capacity production target of 220,000 tonnes of chicken meat. In April, the successful re-fi nancing of our Eurobond 2011, and the issuing of a new one, meant construction work on the new Vinnytsia poultry plant could start earlier than would otherwise have been the case. The new plant will now come on-stream during 2013. When two production lines become operational in 2015, it will give MHP an additional 220,000 tonnes of meat per annum. In 2017/18, the completed complex will become one of the largest poultry plants in Europe and one of the most effi cient worldwide with an annual production of 440,000 tonnes. During the year, we increased our land bank by 100,000 hectares to 280,000 hectares, just as we said we would 12 months ago. “ Self-suffi ciency is at the heart of our business model.” Yuriy Kosyuk Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Strategy & Business Model From our beginnings, MHP has enjoyed the benefi ts of a self-suffi cient business model which gives us control over all aspects of our operations “from farm to fork”. Indeed, I believe that MHP is the most comprehensively vertically- integrated meat production business in the world. Parent birds produce over 250 million eggs per year from which we rear our own chickens to fully grown birds, feed them with our own fodder, made principally from crops we have grown ourselves, distribute the fi nished range of food products in our own fl eet of refrigerated trucks. We have two sales channels: the well known “Nasha Riaba” branded franchised shop network and supermarkets. Investment in innovative new products plays an important role in creating demand for new-to-Ukraine product lines. By producing exactly the sort of high quality, cost effective, reliable products increasingly demanded by Ukrainian families today, ours is a sustainable and robust business model which enables us to maintain quality at every stage of production whilst controlling costs and achieving sector-leading margins. Consequently, meat processing production increased by over 30% this year, while production of convenience products rose by over 120%. Vertical integration reduces MHP’s dependence on suppliers and its exposure to risks such as fl uctuations in raw material prices. By combining two business segments – poultry and grain growing – MHP was not affected by the steep rise in grain prices following the 2010 harvest. We are, therefore, well protected from grain price increases. It also insulates us, to a large degree, from competition as well as from any fl uctuations in Ukraine’s economy and currency exchange rate. Financial Results The 2010 fi nancial performance refl ects the many advances made across the business. A 20% increase in group EBITDA from US$271 million in 2009 to US$325 million this year represents a clear validation of our business model. The increase in group revenue – up 33% from 2009’s US$711 million to US$944 million – demonstrates that we are producing the type of high quality, value-for-money products that Ukrainians want to buy. 11 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information Group Strategy Production costs At all times, we keep production costs under control and have one of the lowest poultry production costs in the industry worldwide. Build on our quality facilities We continue to invest in state-of-the-art production facilities and equipment with the aim of maintaining our position as one of the most modern large scale producers in Europe. Increase our land bank A vital component in maintaining our unique vertically- integrated business model. In 2015 the Company plans to have around 400,000 ha. Strengthen our market share Ukraine’s domestic market for meat products is expanding steadily. From an already dominant position, we are committed to winning an increased share of the processed meat markets through offering a wide range of dependable, high quality products, including more value-added products such as ready meals and convenience foods. Promote our brands We will continue to support our brands through targeted advertising which has resulted in high brand recognition and trust in our products with consequent increasing sales. Expand our distribution networks Over the next fi ve years, we want to see an expansion in the number of our franchise stores (circa 2,600 in 2010). Expansion will also achieve our aim of spreading “Nasha Riaba” branded stores to cover more parts of the country. We will keep the retail sales balance between franchised outlets and supermarkets. 12 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Chief Executive’s review continued “ Our benefi cial business model ensures the Company’s stable profi tability and sustainable growth.” Sales & Markets Almost all current operations are focused on meeting rising domestic demand for nutritious, simple to cook, tasty, cost effective, protein-rich foods like chicken. Whilst we, of course, monitor appropriate opportunities to export, as long as Ukrainian demand for meat products remains high, MHP will be fully occupied in capturing an ever increasing share of this rapidly growing market. An essential element of that will be the on-going success of our “Nasha Riaba”, which is one of the most recognised consumer food brands in Ukraine. At the beginning of 2013 the fi rst line at the Vinnytsia poultry farm is to be launched. The lion’s share of it will be sold locally to satisfy growing domestic demand. The principal driver for growth over the next few years will remain the domestic Ukrainian market prompted largely by increasing average per capita income in the country. Currently the Company exports over 5% of its poultry produce and in the near future we will increase export sales from the current level to 15-20% once the Vinnytsia plant is launched. Export will mostly be directed to CIS, Middle Asia countries as well as the EU. People Today, MHP employs over 22,000 skilled and motivated people and the progress we are making as a Company is in no small way down to their contribution to our joint efforts. I take this opportunity to thank them all. I am proud of the measures MHP is taking to help and support them – measures which are, in some cases, a “fi rst” in Ukraine and, as outlined in the CSR Report on page 26, up to the best international standards to be found anywhere. For me personally, MHP is more than a Company – it is my extended family. That is the passion I have for the Company and which I wish to share with everyone in it. Outlook As I write, all our poultry production facilities are working at full capacity in response to sustained and rising demand for its products. Our production capacity has grown signifi cantly in the past two years with the new Myronivka facilities coming on-stream. Further growth in capacity is scheduled for 2013 when the Vinnytsia plant begins production, at which point we will likely become one of the largest producers in Europe. In the meantime, profi tability will come from continued organic growth in demand for our chicken products, higher volumes and an expansion in our range of processed meat products. Acquisitions, including increasing our land bank still further, will continue to be judged on their ability to help us achieve our corporate aims. With the increase capacity utilisation, meat processing operations will further increase year on year. So, we have the skills, the resources, the facilities and, importantly, the opportunity. Set against a stable legislative background in the domestic agriculture sector and a positive business environment created by Government, I remain as confi dent as I have ever been that MHP will carry on its record of creating expansion, delivering positive results and achieving growth in shareholder value in the years ahead. 13 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information Financial Highlights – Revenue in US dollar terms increased by 33% to US$944 million (2009: US$711 million) – EBITDA in US dollar terms increased by 20% to US$325 million (2009: US$271 million) – Consolidated EBITDA margin slightly decreased to 34% (2009: 38%), but remained high compared to international peers worldwide – Net income was up in US dollar terms by 35%, while net income margin remained stable at 23% – Successful Eurobond issue in April 2010 substantially optimised the Company’s capital structure Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Highlights Operational Highlights Poultry – Myronivka poultry farm successfully achieved its fi rst year at full capacity, resulted in total Company’s poultry production increase by 26% to 360,000 tonnes (2009: 285,000 tonnes) – Following a year of full capacity operation of MHP’s Katerynopilsky sunfl ower crushing plant, 195,800 tonnes of sunfl ower oil was produced in the full year 2010 (2009: 140,400 tonnes), an increase of 39% – Average chicken meat sales prices increased by 7% to UAH 13.65 per kg. against 2009 and average sunfl ower oil prices through the year increased by 27% to 919 US$/t. from 721 US$/t in 2009, in line with world pricing trends. – Annual sales volumes of chicken to third parties increased by 21% to 331,400 tonnes. Demand for chicken was high throughout the year as consumers continued to substitute locally produced chicken for other meat – Throughout the year MHP as always worked at 100% capacity and sold close to 100% of its production Grain Growing – Despite adverse weather conditions MHP’s 2010 harvest was lower yielding than, but still signifi cantly higher than Ukraine’s average per hectare (please see table on page 21 of this Annual Report) – The lower yields worldwide also effected price increases resulting in increased profi tability per hectare for MHP compared to 2009 – During 2010 the Company continued to execute its stated strategy of gradually increasing its land bank and at the end of the period it had around 280,000 hectares of land under control Other Agricultural – Sales of sausages and cooked meat increased by 34% Revenue EBITDA +35%Percentage increase in UAH – 2009-2010 +22%Percentage increase in UAH – 2009-2010 14 Poultry Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Expanding our operations >> MHP has maintained its position as the leader in the Ukrainian poultry market, increasing its market share of industrially produced chicken from around 43% in 2009 to around 50% by the end of 2010, an outstanding achievement. Our poultry production grew by 26% over the previous year, thanks chiefl y to meeting the production targets set for the new Myronivka poultry farm which had its fi rst entire year at full capacity. This was achieved at a time when output from some Ukrainian industrial poultry producers actually fell, their market share declined or they left the sector entirely. Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 49% MHP currently dominates the market of industrially produced chicken, increasing its market share by 7 percentage points in the past year alone. 15 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information 100% At 360 tonnes per year, MHP’s production facilities are always working at full capacity and plans are underway to build on this position. Our wide range of products under the Nasha Riaba brand continues to attract a loyal customer base who look to MHP to provide consistency of quality at the right price. The “Nasha Riaba” brand, in particular, is one of the strongest food brands in Ukraine, achieving over 97% brand recognition. We continue to invest in the development of this brand, both in new products and a wider range, as well as working with our partners to improve and expand the network on “Nasha Riaba” branded stores across the country. We are fi ercely protective of the reputation of our product range which is squarely founded on quality and price. These two vital ingredients in our success stem from a rigid adherence to our vertically-integrated business model which enables us to control quality and costs at every stage of production from the farm and factory fl oor to the customer’s dinner table. Thanks to this approach, MHP is now the leading agro-industrial company in Ukraine. We intend to build on this position in the years ahead. During the year under review, all our production facilities continued to operate at full capacity and our branded franchise retail outlets sold almost 100% what we produce. Increasing Effi ciency and Self-Suffi ciency Breeding MHP owns two poultry breeding farms – Starynska in the Kiev Region and the soon-to-be-extended Shahtarska plant in the Donetsk Region. Starynska supplies the Peremoga Nova and Oril-Leader poultry farms and was expanded in 2008 in order to meet the demand from the Myronivka complex which was completed in 2009. The plant now has 19 rearing sites – seven for young birds and 12 for older birds – and houses around two million birds which in 2010 produced over 200 million hatching eggs. From mid 2010, with the launch of additional breeding capacity at Starynska, MHP became self-suffi cient in hatchery eggs, satisfying the needs of Phase 2 of the Myronivka poultry farm. Production costs consequently decreased in the following period. Shahtarska supplies the Oril-Leader and Druzhba Nova poultry farms. It currently has nine rearing sites – three for young birds and six for laying hens. Over 400,000 birds are housed in this facility producing around 50 million hatching eggs each year. Our breeding plants feature equipment supplied by the leading European manufacturers (including VDL, Agrotech, Big Dutchman, Roksel and Jansen) which regulate all aspects of production from the distribution of feed and drinking water for the hens and the collection of eggs to the control of light, temperatures and humidity in the chicken barns. We continue to invest heavily in the specialist training and development of the staff employed in these facilities. Plans for the major expansion of Shahtarska include the construction of almost 180 additional rearing sites to meet the future demand of the Company’s new Vinnytsia poultry farm, where construction began in 2010. The new facilities will enable the Shahtarska to produce an extraordinary 325 million hatching eggs annually, a fi ve-fold increase on current capacity. Hatching Once the eggs have been certifi ed by the State veterinary authorities, they are transported from the breeder farms in temperature-controlled lorries to closed hatcheries at our chicken farms. There, they are kept in incubators, which control temperature, humidity and air circulation, 16 Poultry continued Geographical presence Myronivsky plant Lehko Vinnytsia Myronivka Peremoya Nova Oril Leader Broiler poultry farms Convenience food production plant Broiler poultry farm under construction Druzhba Narodiv Nova until they hatch at 21 days. The newly hatched chicks are vaccinated against the common respiratory condition, known as Newcastle Disease, and bronchitis before being transferred to sterilised barns on site. Growing In 2010, our four broiler farms, operating at 100% capacity, reared a total of 192 million chickens: 113 million at Myronivka, our largest and newest farm; 16 million at Peremoga; 28 million at Oril-Leader and 35 million at Druzhba Nova. Each farm consists of a hatchery, chicken rearing barns and a slaughter house. Throughout our operations, we go to considerable lengths to ensure full compliance with the latest EU and international standards. Light, temperature, air circulation, feed and water are all carefully controlled to ensure the stable growth and well-being of the birds at all times. Chemicals and steroids are not used at any point in the production process. The feed contains all the fat, protein, vitamins and minerals the chicks need and is adjusted appropriately as they grow. Within 40 to 45 days, the birds have reached a weight of 2.3 to 2.5 kgs and are ready for processing. Myronivka Europe’s most advanced and productive poultry farm Situated 130 km from Kiev in the Cherkasy Region of the country, Myronivka became fully operational in 2009 and is the current jewel in MHP’s crown. At present, 2.25 million chickens are processed each week which equates to some 220,000 tonnes of meat per year. Production costs per kilo of chicken at Myronivka are generally lower than at MHP’s other poultry farms due to the decrease in labour costs and improvements in energy effi ciency. Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 We have introduced a new-to-MHP food safety management system at Myronivka based on the international standards ISO 22000: 2005 and ISO 9001: 2008. Our aim is that all our poultry plants should meet these quality certifi cations by 2012. The EU Commissioner for Agriculture & Rural Development visited Myronivka in 2009 and declared herself impressed by what she saw. This was followed, in May 2010, by a visit from representatives of the European Commission who gave the complex a high rating. MHP is currently waiting for certifi cation which will eventually clear the way for the export of poultry products to the EU. Vinnytsia Taking production on to a new level During 2010, we began construction of what will become Europe’s largest poultry complex – at Vinnytsia in central Ukraine. Based on similar lines to Myronivka but double the size, the new facility will be a fully integrated, ultra-modern production plant featuring its own incubator and breeder farm, hatchery, a mixed fodder plant, a slaughterhouse and a sunfl ower crushing plant, together with all the necessary infrastructure to support its activities. The fi rst production phase will be launched in 2013. In 2015 two production lines at Phase 1 will be operational, by which time the total MHP production of chicken meat will be 580,000 tonnes. By 2017-18, the completed plant will have a total of four production lines with a capacity to produce 440,000 tonnes per annum – no less than double the capacity of Myronivka. With this dramatic increase in capacity, MHP will have the opportunity to replace a signifi cant proportion of low quality deep frozen imported meat from USA and Brazil as well as continuing to satisfy growing domestic demand for high quality products. Additionally, the increased volumes may contribute to exports as and when such opportunities arise. Our current land bank of 280,000 hectares is enough to satisfy the internal crop needs of the fi rst phase of the Vinnytsia complex. A Vertically-Integrated System Ingredients for Feed The price of animal feed represents the greatest potential for fl uctuation in the cost of operational overheads. We have achieved our objective of overcoming this factor by growing all the corn and around 15-17% of the sunfl ower we need. A by-product of the seed crushing process is the production of sunfl ower oil. In 2010, the Company increased its sales of oil by 39% to 195,800 tonnes compared to 140,400 tonnes in 2009. We will continue to use the proceeds of selling oil on the international markets to service our US$-denominated debt. The launch of the Vinnytsia facilities from 2013 will result in an increase in sunfl ower oil production arising from increased feed output to satisfy the demands of the new plant. Our sunfl ower oil production will increase foreign currency revenues. Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 17 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information Vinnytsia, a new level of production >> The Vinnytsia poultry complex will come on-stream progressively from 2013 and will be one of the most advanced chicken processing facilities in the world. 2005-09 Production doubled 2013 Phase 1 Projection US$ 750m Construction, completion and production launch of our fi rst greenfi eld project, Myronivka, producing 220,000 tonnes of meat per annum. The fi rst production line begins operations on schedule, adding approximately 50,000 tonnes of chicken meat to MHP’s total annual production. 2005-2006 2007 2008 2009 2010-2012 2013 2014 2015-2016 2017-2018 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 133 40 92 152 227 227 227 227 227 50 160 220 220 0 200 400 When complete, Vinnytsia will be the jewel in MHP’s crown: an ultra-modern, fully integrated production plant featuring its own breeder farm and hatchery, slaughterhouse, mixed fodder plant, sunfl ower crushing plant and infrastructure. 220 600 800 1000 thousand tonnes 2015-16 Projection 2017-18 Phase 2 Launch of second production line and completion of Phase 1 of Vinnytsia development with an increase in production to 220,000 tonnes of chicken meat per annum. In 2015, total MHP production of chicken across the Group will be 580,000 tonnes per annum. Phase 2 opens – Vinnytsia complex now complete with four production lines and a total capacity of 440,000 tonnes of meat per annum. 18 Poultry continued Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Feed Production and Storage We operate three feed production facilities – MFC near Kiev, TKZ in southern Ukraine and Katerynopilsky – and fi ve storage facilities – MFC, Novomoskovsky, Rakita, Katerynopilsky and Dobropilsky – which together have a capacity of approximately 735,000 cubic metres. The mills are strategically positioned to minimise transportation time and cost: MFC supplies Myronivka, Starynska and Shahtarska; TKZ supplies Druzhba Nova; and Katerynopilsky supplies Myronivka, Oril-Leader and Peremoga. Construction began in 2010 of a new fodder mill in the Vinnytsia region. Processing The chickens are slaughtered, dressed and chilled, either whole or in portions, on the same site at which they are reared. We use the most up-to-date technology in the chilling process to preserve fl avour and texture, and packaged chicken is kept at 2 degrees Centigrade before being delivered to customers. Any meat which is surplus to immediate requirements is frozen. Most parts of our chilled chicken are sold under our market-leading “Nasha Riaba” brand through our network of franchised shops or through supermarkets. MFC, which produced over 430,000 tonnes of feed in 2010, comprises a fodder mill, a protein mill, fi ve grain stores and a cereals mill. Fodder production increased by over 12% in 2009. Each of its two production lines can produce 220,000 tonnes per annum. The protein mill has the capacity to produce 560 tonnes of sunfl ower cake and 440 tonnes of sunfl ower oil a day. The cereal mill is used to peel peas and oats. Value-Added Food MHP is Ukraine’s leading producer of innovative convenience food. The products – which range from uncooked marinated meat to pre-cooked meals – are produced on modern production lines at our Myronivsky Meat Processing Plant and are blast frozen to protect their fl avour. They are sold through franchised stores, supermarkets and the food service trade. The Myronivsky meat processing plant in the Kiev Region has been operational since 2006 and is the only Ukrainian specialist in prepared frozen meat products. Five production lines use fresh ingredients from MHP’s own farms to produce fi nished products. These are branded and sold under the well known “Lehko!” name. Production at Lehko is steadily increasing. In 2009, output was 9,300 tonnes. In 2010, thanks to the growth in demand for our expanding range of convenience food products, the plant met its target of increasing production to 21,000 tonnes, an increase of 126% compared to 2009 production volumes. The plant is certifi ed to ISO 22000: 2005 and ISO 9001: 2000 standards and has qualifi ed to export its produce to Belarus, Kazakhstan, Georgia and Moldova. TKZ, which has a capacity of 220,000 tonnes per annum, produced over 186,000 tonnes in 2010 and increased its production by 93% compared to 96,500 tonnes in 2009. Katerynopilsky has two production lines which together have a capacity of approximately 600,000 tonnes each year. In 2010, they produced 476,000 tonnes of fodder – a 20% increase on the previous year thanks largely to the increased demand from Myronivka. The fi rst silos, which are part of the new fodder production facilities at Vinnytsia, will be operational at the end of 2011. These silos will accommodate the output of our new increased land bank. When Vinnytsia is operational, its fodder requirements will be supplied by the new fodder plant. Replacing soya bean protein with sunfl ower protein decreases our production costs per kilo. This gives us two signifi cant competitive advantages over other domestic poultry producers who, fi rstly, are not as vertically-integrated as MHP and cannot benefi t from the cost-effective “grain-fodder-poultry-customer” supply chain that we enjoy at MHP. Secondly, our competitors either have to buy in fodder based on soya bean protein, or import expensive soya from abroad and produce fodder from that. With recent dramatic grain price increases, this lack of self-suffi ciency is of critical importance. Biosecurity and maintaining quality >> Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Distribution & Sales As part of our vertically-integrated business model, controlling all aspects of our production from egg production to merchandising displays in shops, MHP maintains its own comprehensive network of distribution and logistics centres around Ukraine. MHP has three main distribution channels allowing effective control of costs, eleven subsidiary distribution centres, a fl eet of 450 refrigerated lorries and 2,600 retail outlets across Ukraine. Our vehicle fl eet acts as high profi le, mobile advertising hoardings for our products. We enjoy the benefi ts and security of a well-diversifi ed customer base. In Ukraine, the overwhelming preference of households is for fresh, chilled products as opposed to frozen. The demands and personal service expectations of Ukrainians are both served by independent, franchised retailers and supermarkets. During 2010, the number of “Nasha Riaba” franchised stores increased from around 2,300 to just over 2,600. We hope to see a further increase and foresee the franchise sector remaining the most important single outlet source for MHP products for the foreseeable future. In addition, we aim to maintain a balance of sales between franchises and supermarkets. Strategic Objectives MHP has experienced expansion, year on year, since it began operations in 1998 and we intend to pursue further expansion as a principal corporate objective. The fi rst full year of production at Myronivka and further green fi eld developments such as Vinnytsia represent the scale of organic growth of which we are capable. We will expand our land bank and pursue our goal to increase diversifi cation into the grain market sale. The increasing size of our operations brings with it greater economies of scale by reducing operating costs per unit which, incidentally, are already amongst the lowest in the industry worldwide. We intend to continue that downward drive in the interests of meeting the increasing demand from customers for a comprehensive range of attractive, high quality, well priced products. In the near term, our aim is to become one of the biggest poultry producers in Europe. In addition to satisfying increasing domestic demand, in the longer term we will look at further growth through export opportunities to EU countries and the Middle East. 19 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information Poultry distribution channels By volume 1 3 1. Retail 2. Franchise Stores 3. Hotels, restaurants, catering businesses, meat processors 40% 40% 20% 2 +126% Increase of convenience food production in the last year. Lehko! is a vast range of innovative convenience food. 33% MHP accounts for over a third of Ukraine’s fast growing poultry consumption A fl eet of 450 refrigerated lorries and 2,600 outlets across Ukraine 20 Grain Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Increasing our land bank >> Arable farms play a strategic role in MHP’s vertically- integrated business model. The Company not only runs this business effi ciently and receives high yields, but also demonstrates high profi tability sector wise. Its eight arable farms provide MHP’s fodder plants with grain and oil crops; the fodder plants supply fodder for the broiler plants and breeding farms; the poultry farms, in turn, provide our crop- growing enterprises with organic fertiliser. Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 The Ukrainian climate, with its mixture of adequate rainfall and plentiful sunshine, combined with our famously fertile soil is ideal for growing crops. Growing our own supplies means we can maintain quality whilst controlling costs. Additionally, the crops we do not use for fodder – and the various by-products from those we do – provide signifi cant extra revenue to the Group through their sale on the open market. For example, in 2010, we earned US$36 million from sales of grain to third parties, an additional contribution to groupwide cashfl ows. We use corn, sunfl owers and wheat grown on our eight arable farms to produce mixed fodder which is used to feed the chickens and livestock in our care. MHP continued with its strategy of gradually increasing its land bank and at the end of the period had 280,000 hectares of land under its control. At the same time, the bulk of the 2010 harvest was generated from land that was under the Company’s control at the beginning of the year (total land bank at December 2009: 180,000 hectares including 150,000 hectares growing grain). Despite generally unfavourable weather conditions in the summer of 2010, MHP yields were twice the Ukrainian average. The proportions of crops grown are 40% corn, 30% wheat, 15% sunfl owers and 15% other crops. Our continuing drive to increase effi ciency across the business has led to welcome increases in crop yield through the introduction of up-to-date farming practices, modern technology and the latest equipment on all our farms. In 2010, despite generally unfavourable weather conditions, our arable farms produced remarkable yields twice the Ukrainian average. Due to the grain increase in the market, MHP’s EBITDA per hectare in 2010 was US$458, a very satisfactory performance. We acquired some grain growing enterprises in Sumy and Khmelnytsky regions as predicted in last year’s Annual Report. The size of our land bank increased to some 280,000 hectares during the year in order to meet increased demand from our expanding production facilities and to allow for further diversifi cation into the production and sale of profi table, in-demand by-products. Land acquisitions included some grain-growing enterprises in the Sumy and Khmelnytsky regions of the country. 21 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information 8arable farms We use corn, sunfl owers and wheat grown on our eight arable farms to produce mixed fodder which is used to feed the chickens and livestock in our care. Geographical presence MHP’s land bank 2010 Crops yield Tonnes/ha 10 8 6 4 2 0 8 . 7 3 . 4 8 . 4 9 . 2 6 . 2 6 . 1 0 . 3 7 . 1 Corn Wheat Sunflower Rapeseed MHP1 Ukraine2 EBITDA and land bank ‘000 ha/US$ 500 400 300 200 100 0 0 3 1 7 4 1 0 5 1 1 0 3 0 5 1 8 5 4 Land bank3 EBITDA4 per hectare 2008 2009 2010 1. Yields based on net weight 2. Yields based on bunker weight 3. Land bank available for cultivation at the beginning of the season 4. Unadjusted EBITDA, which includes results from inter-company sales of grain to poultry segment for fodder production at market price 22 Other agricultural operations Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Meat processing and other products >> Our third business division produces a wide variety of fresh and prepared value-added mass market products ranging from sausages and cooked meats to top quality beef, foie gras, fruits and milk. Sausages & Processed increase Meat In 2010, overall production increase in this division was mostly driven by the growth of our meat processing operations, strengthening our already leading position in the highly fragmented Ukrainian processed meat sector. MHP is, in fact, the market leader with more than 10% market share in Ukraine. The Group’s vertically-integrated business model applies as much to this division as to other parts of the Group. We rear our own livestock – cattle, pigs and geese – on our own farms and grow the crops that go into their fodder. 50% of the ingredients in product recipes is chicken, the rest being pork and/or beef. We sell the division’s products through the network of “Nasha Riaba” stores and through other retail outlets, including supermarkets and distributors, as well as direct to the food service industry. Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Our two plants producing sausages and cooked meats saw sales rise by 34% to almost 32,900 tonnes in 2010. Druzhba Narodiv, in Crimea, produces over 90 different types of pork and beef sausages as well as MHP’s “Certifi ed Angus” brand of prime beef. The plant is one of the most modern in Ukraine, having opened in 2007, and output is currently 50 tonnes per day. In the year under review, 9,000 head of cattle were reared and 27,000 pigs. Products are principally sold under the “Druzhba Narodiv”, “Baschinsky” “Europroduct” brand labels. Ukrainian Bacon, based in the Donetsk Region, joined the Group in 2008 and has a daily output of 48 tonnes of cooked meats and sausages sold under the “Baschinsky” and “Europroduct” brand labels catering mainly to the lower priced, value-for-money end of the market. In addition, the plant produces 20 tonnes of ready-to-cook products, such as dumplings, and a further 20 tonnes of poultry. A programme of investment in the plant has resulted in a further increase production – another strategic objective for 2010 – by modernising existing facilities and expanding the plant’s heat treatment capabilities. We believe Ukrainian Bacon has the potential to increase its annual production to a total of over 150,000 tonnes per annum from 2011. Goose & Foie Gras The Snyatynska complex in the west of Ukraine houses a hatchery, over 50 geese rearing houses and a processing plant producing a range of high quality products including mousses, terrines and fois gras pate. Also during the year, the plant was licensed to export its products to Russia. The plant’s food quality and safety control management systems fully comply with ISO 9001: 2008 and ISO 22000: 2005. In May 2010, European Commission representatives visited Snyatynska and expressed their high opinion of its operations. Fruit Established in 2003 as a part of the Druzhba Narodiv operations, MHP’s Crimea Fruits company uses 50% of its about 2,000 hectares of land to grow apples, with the remainder being used to cultivate grapes, peaches, apricots, strawberries and pears. The climate in this part of southern Ukraine is similar to that of northern Italy and, therefore, ideal for growing fruit. The harvested fruit is stored in 32 atmospherically controlled refrigerators with the capacity to handle over 8,000 tonnes of fruit as production grows towards its peak over the next few years. In addition to harvesting and storage facilities, there are commercial fruit processing and packaging lines on site. Produce is sold mainly direct to supermarkets. 23 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information Continuing Expansion MHP continues to value the growing contribution our other agricultural activities make to the Group as a whole and we welcome the diversifi cation the division represents and the wide variety of products it enables us to offer our customers. There is no doubt that the division has the potential for signifi cant expansion perhaps most particularly in our processed meats which already generate the largest proportion of revenue in the division. We are committed to investing in the most modern production facilities and innovative new products which meet consumer demand for variety, quality and affordability. Major Ukrainian meat processors % of Ukrainian market 1 2 6 7 10 9 8 1. MHP 2. Yatran 3. Globinskiy 4. Gorlovsky 5. Yubileiny 6. Favorit 7. SMP 8. Luganskiy 9. Kremenchug 10. Others 9.5 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 3.7 3.7 48.3 3 4 5 Meat processing production tonnes ’000 2010 2009 2008 32.9 34% 24.6 54% 16.0 Geographical presence Ukrainian Bacon Meat processing enterprises Druzhba Narodiv 24 Risk management Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Some of the risks the Group faces are common to all commercial operations, some are inherent in farming in general and chicken farming in particular. The principal risks the Group faces are macro- economic, fi nancial and operational. MHP has effective policies in place to manage and, where possible, to avoid these risks. Risk Potential Impact Mitigation Operational Risks Fluctuations in demand and market prices. A fall in demand. Avian fl u and other livestock diseases. In recent years, avian fl u has affected wild birds and poultry fl ocks in a number of countries. It was fi rst discovered in Ukraine in December 2005 and was still present in the Crimea and Sumy regions in 2008. Fluctuations in grain prices. World prices could affect our poultry production costs. Increased cost for, or disruptions in, gas and fuel supplies. Gas and fuel, used for production and distribution, are imported. Uncertainty in supply and fl uctuating prices could affect production and costs. Weather. Inclement weather could affect crop yield. Falls in demand can generally be overcome with modest price reductions. Per capita consumption of meat is still low in comparison with other European countries and demand for chicken will, we believe continue to increase. Beef and pork are mostly produced by householders and are far more expensive to produce and purchase than chicken, kg for kg. We operate strict biosecurity measures, including disinfectant washes, culling wild birds in the immediate vicinity of our farms. We grow 100% of the corn we need for feed and replace expensive protein from imported soya beans with that from sunfl ower seeds. We also grow around 15% of the sunfl owers we need and buy the rest from domestic growers. Chicken always benefi ts from this when compared to other kinds of meat such as pork and beef because of the lower conversion rate (amount of grain required to produce 1kg of meat). Gas and fuel represent only about 7% of our overall costs. We are increasing our use of co-generation and alternative energy technology. When we process sunfl ower seeds we are left with a huge amount of husks; we burn some to generate steam heat for our processing plant; a proportion is converted into briquettes for generating energy and these are exported. Ukraine’s weather is generally temperate, with plenty of sunshine in summer and adequate rainfall; this combines with extremely fertile earth to create excellent growing conditions. In addition, our management of our land and the use of modern technology enable us to achieve a yield which is signifi cantly higher than the average for Ukraine. Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 25 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information Risk Financial Risks Credit risk. Potential Impact Mitigation Debtors fail to make scheduled payments. No single customer represents more than 8% of total sales. The amount of credit allowed to one customer or group of customers is strictly controlled. Credit to major groups of customers, including supermarkets and franchises, is restricted to between fi ve and 21 days. Liquidity risk. Lack of funds to make payments due. MHP has a detailed budgeting and cash forecasting process to ensure that adequate funds are available. Our target is to maintain our current ratio, defi ned as the proportion of current assets to current liabilities, at more than 1.1–1.2. Currency exchange risk. Exposure to fl uctuation in exchange rates. We do not use derivatives, which are neither available nor routinely used in Ukraine, to manage our exposure. Inability to repay US dollar debt. We earn around 25% of our total revenue in US dollars through the sale of sunfl ower oil, sunfl ower husk, grain and meat. This represents a hedge against exchange risk and very nearly services our dollar-denominated loans. In addition, our strategy of growing the majority of our own ingredients for feed, rather than relying on imports, helps to reduce our exposure. Interest rate risk. Changes in interest rates affecting the cost of borrowings, the value of our fi nancial instruments, and our profi t and loss and shareholders’ equity. While MHP borrows on both fi xed and variable rates, the majority of our debt is at fi xed rates. For variable rate borrowings, interest is linked to LIBOR and EUROLIBOR and they are generally at lower interest rates than are available in Ukraine. 26 Corporate social responsibility Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Stable and sustainable >> MHP strives to introduce modern, international standards of corporate responsibility across the Group. In many ways, we believe we are one of the leading Ukrainian companies in this area, expanding our involvement in a comprehensive range of innovative welfare initiatives for the community, the environment and staff. Our aim – as in all other areas of the business – is to satisfy ourselves and our stakeholders that MHP adheres to best practice when it comes to corporate social responsibility. Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 The Community We are fully aware of our social obligations to the communities in which we are active. During the year under review, a joint survey of MHP published by the IFC (International Financial Corporation) and the EBRD (European Bank of Reconstruction & Development) stated that the Company generally “has very good community relations and actively participates in community work”. Some examples of recent initiatives are set out below. Education — Each year, we sponsor a number of agricultural education placements for the children of employees, offer employment to suitably qualifi ed, recently graduated students from Ukraine’s leading agricultural colleges and provide rent-free accommodation and specialist training for new employees. — We support local schools and kindergartens by providing school meals and products from our range as well as fi nancial support for repair and refurbishment works, including the creation of modern playground facilities and the purchase of equipment. — Where appropriate, we support local road improvement initiatives in the vicinity of our plants, providing modern, high quality stretches of road for use both by the public and vehicles making their way to and from MHP facilities. Charities — In December 2010, working in partnership with the charity “Ukraine, I’m for You!”, MHP provided funds for the purchase of a foetal monitor for the maternity department of the Putivla District Hospital in the Sumy region of the country. We also make occasional contributions to employees towards the cost of surgery for family members. — In the area of national heritage, we give occasional grants towards the restoration of historic buildings near our production plants. For example, close to Druzhba Narodiv site in the Crimea region, we gave fi nancial support to the refurbishment of a well known and architecturally important local church. — MHP offers help-in-kind, such as food products, to support a network of local HIV/AIDS clinics in areas where the Company has operations. 27 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information Leisure — MHP sponsors a number of local festivals in areas where we have operations. Often, these have a food and healthy eating theme at their heart. Examples include the “Without GMO” music festival held in Sebastopol in the Crimea region which was attended by around 40,000 people. — “Chicken Fest”, held in Kiev’s ExpoCenter in May each year has established itself as one of the country’s premier festivals based on a theme of healthy eating and healthy lifestyles. Environment and sustainability We have set up a biomass heating facility at the Myronivka fodder plant which recycles sunfl ower husks left over from fodder production. Health and safety Equipment is inspected regularly and we have established programmes designed to improve worksite safety training and working conditions. Employees We subsidise the cost of food served in our canteens and provide apartments for a number of best employees and their families. “ MHP has a clear and transparent corporate governance framework and provides adequate disclosure.” 28 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Corporate responsibility continued Environment MHP is aware of the effects its operations may have on the environment and seeks to minimise impacts wherever possible by maintaining the highest international standards. In particular, energy effi ciency has a high priority across the business – as well as fi nding alternative sources of energy including co-generation. That’s why we have set up a biomass heating facility at the Myronivka fodder plant which burns sunfl ower husks left over from fodder production. We are looking at further opportunities across other MHP production facilities. Our activities are subject to various environmental, health, safety, sanitary, veterinary and other laws and regulations including those governing fi re, air emissions, solid waste and wastewater discharges and the use, storage, treatment and disposal of hazardous materials, such as disinfectants. Any chemicals we use and the waste we produce could, for example, have a negative impact on the wildlife and vegetation close to our facilities if they were discharged improperly. We make annual payments – effectively an environmental tariff – to the State in order to compensate for any pollution we do generate. These payments are adjusted each year and, being based on expected emissions, would increase signifi cantly if actual levels were higher. MHP has never incurred material environmental penalties nor have we been subject to material environmental investigations. We do not produce a signifi cant amount of packaging and our products are predominantly sold in returnable containers. Genetically modifi ed materials: MHP does not use genetically modifi ed materials in its fodder or its products. Steroids, antibiotics and other substances: MHP does not use steroids in its chicken production. Pesticides and agro-chemicals: MHP’s crop rotation process enables it to minimise the use of pesticides and agro-chemicals, to the extent that we use either, we comply with the current legislation governing their use. Employees MHP is fully aware of its obligations to its employees. We implement a programme of personal development for our staff and job-specifi c training, including health and safety awareness. Additionally, we provide a range of other initiatives designed to offer practical help and promote health and well-being off the work site. These include: — Modern sports and leisure facilities for the use of staff and their families at the majority of our facilities. — Buses to take employees to and from their places of work – and to take their children to school and back. — At each of our plants, we subsidise the cost of food provided in our canteens so that a full midday meal costs only UAH 1. — MHP provides one and two-bedroomed apartments for a number of employees and their families. Such apartments are provided at the Myronivka plant under our “Young Specialist” incentive programme for employees with at least 5 years’ service with the Company. — A range of performance related benefi ts, managed locally on an individual basis, including extra holidays, help with accommodation and the costs of buying houses, salary bonuses. The majority of our employees belong to trade unions, or labour or workers’ syndicates, and collective bargaining agreements are in place at most of our operations. Our facilities operate year round and there is little seasonal fl uctuation in our labour force. Worksite Safety We have established programmes designed to improve worksite safety training and working conditions. Equipment is inspected regularly and our labour protection department is responsible for ensuring that we comply with health and safety requirements at all times. Remuneration We operate a two-tier remuneration scheme: a fi xed salary and a performance-related bonus. Fixed salaries comply with employment legislation. Performance- related bonuses depend on the effi ciency and quality of production achieved by each employee as well as the facility at which he or she works. They are paid as a fi xed sum on an annual basis. Pensions Pensions are based on salary, as required by legislation. Holidays All employees are entitled to a minimum of 24 days’ paid holiday plus public holidays. Maternity Leave Employees are entitled to 70 working days’ paid leave before the birth of their child and 56 working days afterwards. Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Financial review 29 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information MHP is one of Ukraine’s leading agro-industrial companies, focused on producing chicken and chicken products, processed meat products and growing grain. As the leading poultry producer in Ukraine, according to the State Customs Service of Ukraine (SCSU) MHP, accounted for approximately 50% of all chicken commercially produced in the country and 33% from poultry consumption in 2010. We also have one of the country’s largest portfolios of agricultural land and we have continued our strategy of gradually increasing our land bank. At the end of 2010 we had more than 280,000 hectares of land under control. In addition, we produce and sell sunfl ower oil as a by-product of producing chicken feed, as well as sausages, cooked meat, convenience foods, beef, goose, milk and other agricultural products. Operations Our operations are structured into three segments: Poultry, Grain and Other Agricultural Operations. Poultry and Related Operations. This segment produces and sells chicken and chicken products, sunfl ower oil, convenience food, mixed fodder and other products related to the poultry production process. In 2010 it accounted for 84.8% of total sales (2009: 81.2%). Grain Growing Operations. This segment, produces feed grain for our own operations; a proportion is also sold to third parties. In 2010, grain sold to third parties was responsible for 3.8% of MHP’s total revenues (2009: 6.4%). Other Agricultural Operations. This segment produces and sells sausages and cooked meat, as well as goose, foie gras, milk and other agricultural products. It accounted for 11.5% of 2010 sales (2009: 12.4%). Results Continuing operations Revenue Net change in fair value of bio-assets and agricultural produce Cost of sales Gross profi t Gross margin, % Selling, general and administrative expenses Government grants recognised as income Other operating expenses and income, net Operating profi t before loss on impairment of property, plant and equipment Depreciation EBITDA EBITDA margin, % Loss on impairment of PPE Operating profi t Finance costs, net Finance income Foreign exchange gains/(losses) Gain realised from acquisitions, disposals and changes in non-controlling interest in subsidiaries Other expenses and income, net Profi t before tax Taxes Net income Net margin, % 2010 US$000 2009 US$000 Change % 944,206 711,004 29,014 35,236 (680,637) 292,583 (499,163) 247,077 33% (18%) 36% 18% 31% 35% (11%) (102,107) 82,058 (15,750) 256,784 67,902 324,686 34% 256,784 (62,944) 13,309 10,965 – (793) 217,321 (80,972) 67,812 (14,633) 219,284 51,677 270,961 38% (1,304) 217,980 (50,817) 3,823 (23,580) 5,413 696 153,515 (1,873) 6,488 215,448 23% 160,003 23% 26% 21% 8% 17% 31% 20% (10%) (100%) 18% 24% 248% n/a n/a n/a 42% n/a 35% 1% All the key fi nancial indicators during 2010 increased year-on-year as reported in local currency (Hryvnia – UAH) as well as the US dollars. In 2010, MHP’s consolidated revenues from continuing operations in UAH increased by 35% to UAH7,490 million (2009: UAH5,552 million) – a refl ection of the strong performance of the Company’s poultry segment and the growth of chicken meat sales volumes. In US dollars it also increased by 33% to US$944.2 million (2009: US$711.0 million). Gross profi t from continuing operations in Hryvna increased by 21% to UAH2,319 million (2009: UAH1,923 million) and in US dollars it increased by 18% to US$292.6 (2009: US$247.1 million), gross margin was down by from 35% in 2009 to 31% in 2010. EBITDA in local currency increased by 22% to UAH2,574 million (2009: UAH2,113 million) and in US dollars it increased by 20% to US$324.7 (2009: US$271.0 million). EBITDA margin slightly decreased from 38% to 34%. EBITDA EBITDA does not represent operating income or net cash provided by operating activities as those items are defi ned by IFRS and should not be considered as an alternative to operating income or cash fl ow from operations or indicative of whether cash fl ows will be suffi cient to fund our future cash requirements. EBITDA is not a measure of profi tability because it does not include costs and expenses for depreciation and amortisation, net fi nance costs and income taxes and foreign exchange gains and losses (net), other expenses and other income, gain realised from acquisitions and changes in non-controlling interests in subsidiaries (net) and loss on impairment of property, plant and equipment. 30 Financial review continued Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Net income for the year from continuing operation increased signifi cantly to UAH 1,708 million (2009: of UAH 1,245 million) or US$215.4 million (2009: US$160.0 million). Net margin remained stable at 23%. Income Statement by Segments in 2010 Revenue Total revenue Inter-segment eliminations Sales to external customers Net change in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce Gross Profi t* Selling, general and administrative expenses Government grants, recognised as income Other operating income/expenses Segment result/operating profi t EBITDA Finance cost Finance income Foreign exchange gains Other income/expenses Profi t before tax Income tax expenses Net profi t from continuing operations Poultry US$000 Grain US$000 Other agricultural US$000 Unallocated US$000 Total US$000 828,821 (28,584) 800,237 121,299 (85,668) 35,631 111,691 (3,353) 108,338 9,473 17,019 239,717 46,378 (66,465) 65,690 (13,869) – 9,995 (608) 2,522 6,488 (7,850) 6,373 (1,273) – 1,061,811 (117,605) – 944,206 – – – 29,014 292,583 (27,792) – – (102,107) 82,058 (15,750) 225,073 55,765 3,738 (27,792) 256,784 272,673 – – – – – – – 67,162 – – – – – – – 9,323 – – – – – – – (24,472) – – – – – – – 324,686 (62,944) 13,309 10,965 (793) 217,321 (1,873) 215,448 * Gross profi t to external customers as adjusted for inter-segment sales results General tax system – tax legislation changes The new Tax Code of Ukraine, which was enacted in December 2010, introduced gradual decreases in income tax rates over the coming years (from 23% effective 1 April 2011 to 16% effective 1 January 2014), as well as certain changes to the rules of income tax assessment starting from 1 April 2011. In accordance with the new Tax Code of Ukraine, the VAT rate will be decreased from currently effective 20% to 17% in 2014. State support for agricultural production in Ukraine In view of the agricultural sector’s importance to the national economy, as well as the need to improve living conditions in rural areas, support for the sector is a major priority for the Ukrainian government. During 2010, as with previous years, State support was provided in the form of special tax regimes (VAT and Corporate Income Tax). According to the New Tax Code, the special VAT regime for the agricultural industry will be effective through 1 January 2018. The majority of the Group companies that are involved in agricultural production pay the Fixed Agricultural Tax (the “FAT”) in accordance with the Law “On Fixed Agricultural Tax” and are exempt from Corporate Income Tax and other taxes such as Land Tax, Municipal Tax, Natural Resources Usage Duty, Geological Survey Duty, and Trade Patent. This tax regime is valid indefi nitely. Foreign currency exchange rates and functional currency MHP’s operating assets are located in Ukraine and its revenues and costs are principally denominated in hryvnas. Approximately 25% of our revenue and almost all fi nancial costs are denominated in foreign currencies, primarily US dollars. Management believes that MHP’s exposure to currency exchange rate fl uctuations as a result of foreign currency costs is almost completely offset by its US dollar revenue earned from the export of sunfl ower oil, sunfl ower husks, chicken meat and grains. In total, during 2010, the Company generated US$240 million of revenue in foreign currencies (US$153 million in 2009). Sunfl ower oil and related products Chicken meat Grains Other agricultural segment products Total export revenue 2010 2009 188,156 29,147 22,454 290 104,864 17,650 30,109 270 240,047 152,893 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 31 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information The functional currency for the Group’s companies is the Ukrainian Hryvnia (UAH), however, for convenience of users of fi nancial statements, MHP presents its fi nancial statements in US dollars (US$). UAH/US$ UAH/EUR As of 31 December 2010 Average for 2010 As of 31 December 2009 Average for 2009 As of 31 December 2008 7.9617 10.5731 7.9353 10.5313 7.9850 11.4489 7.7916 10.8736 7.7000 10.8555 Average for 2008 5.2693 7.7114 Acquisitions During 2010 MHP aggressively expanded its grain growing business, resulting in an increase in the total amount of land under the Company’s control to more than 280.000 hectares. Mostly new lands are located close to existing grain growing facilities in Cherkassy and Vinnnitsa region in Central Ukraine with favourable climate conditions. Also MHP expanded its grain growing activity entering into two new regions of Ukraine – Sumy and Khmelnytsky. A signifi cant part of the newly acquired entities contained an established grain growing business. Poultry and related operations Revenue – Chicken meat and other – Sunfl ower oil IAS 41 standard gains Gross profi t Gross margin EBITDA EBITDA margin EBITDA per 1kg of chicken meat 12010 US$000 800,237 620,255 179,982 9,473 239,717 30% 272,673 34.1% 0.82 2009 US$00 577,143 475,869 101,274 16,670 218,713 37.9% 233,787 40.5% 0.86 Growth rate % 39% 30% 78% (43%) 10% (21%) 17% (16%) (4%) MHP’s revenue from its poultry and related operations segment is principally generated from sales of chicken and, to a lesser extent, of sunfl ower oil (a by-product of its sunfl ower protein production), mixed fodder and convenience food. The division’s revenue accounted for 84.8% of MHP total revenue from continuing operations (2009: 81.2%) and 84.0% of its EBITDA (2009: 86.3%). Revenue from sales of chicken meat and other poultry is primarily from sales of chilled chicken, whole or in portions, ancillary products (such as hearts and livers), frozen chicken and convenience food under the Lehko! brand, as well as other products related to the poultry production process. In 2010, chicken meat sales volumes to the third parties on an adjusted-weight basis increased by 21% to 331,400 tonnes (2009: 272,900 tonnes). This volume growth was despite Ukraine’s total poultry production volumes in 2010 only increasing by 8% and was a result of the Myronivka poultry farm operating at full capacity for the full year. The increased cost of grain was the main driver for the growth in prices for all varieties of meat in 2010. Chicken meat prices were less affected by the growth in grain prices due to a better fodder conversion rate compared to other types of meat. As a result, during the year, consumer demand for chicken remained high; all MHP’s poultry production units continued to operate at 100% capacity utilisation and the Company was able to sell close to 100% of the chicken produced. Average chicken meat sales prices increased by almost 7% to 13.65 UAH per kg. against 2009 and average sunfl ower oil prices through the year increased by 27% to 919 US$/t from 721 US$/t in 2009 in line with world market trends. MHP produces sunfl ower oil as a by-product of using sunfl ower seeds in the manufacture of chicken feed. Almost 100% of the sunfl ower oil it produces is exported. Following a year of full capacity operation at MHP’s Katerynopilsky sunfl ower crushing plant, 195,800 tonnes of sunfl ower oil was sold in the full year 2010, compared to 140,400 tonnes in 2009, an increase of 39%. US dollar revenues from the sale of sunfl ower oil increase by 78% to US$180.0 million (2009:US$101.3 million). As a result, segment revenue increased by 39% to US$800.2 million (2009: US$577.1 million). Poultry production costs in 2010 in UAH were slightly higher compared to 2009 due to the increase in the market price of corn, which the Company uses to calculate its costs in the poultry segment (through the nine months of 2009 in chicken feed was used corn harvested in 2008 with unusually low price). However, as MHP is 100% self-suffi cient in corn and has a high level of vertical-integration, the higher prices of grains in 2010 had a positive effect on the fi nancial performance of the Company’s Grain Growing segment. 32 Financial review continued Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 The cost of raw materials and other inventory in the Poultry division, is primarily for feed grain and other items associated with producing fodder, as well as for those associated with purchasing and producing hatching eggs. Most of the feed grain used in poultry production, such as corn, and partially sunfl ower seeds, is produced by the Company’s grain growing division. Management believes that the prices at which products are sold between divisions are generally consistent with average market prices and do, therefore, comply with Ukrainian transfer pricing rules. The gross profi t in the poultry segment increased by 10% from US$218.7 million in 2009 to US$239.7 million in 2010, while the gross profi t margin decrease from 38% in 2009 to 30% in 2010. Such a decrease is partly attributable to the increase in the share of sunfl ower oil sales in total poultry segment sales. According to the Group accounting policy sunfl ower oil gross margin is zero*. Segment EBITDA in 2010 increased by 17% to 272.7 million (2009: US$233.8 million). Lower EBITDA margin in the poultry segment in 2010 (34% compared to 41% in 2009) was compensated by higher fi nancial results in grain growing segment. Grain growing Revenue IAS 41 standard gains Gross profi t EBITDA EBITDA per 1 hectare 2010 US$000 35,631 17,019 46,378 67,162 458 2009 US$00 45,752 17,862 24,903 44,312 301 Growth rate % (22%) (5%) 86% 52% 52% MHP grows four major crops: corn and sunfl owers, which are used in its own operations; and wheat and rape, which are sold to third parties in the Ukrainian domestic market. In 2010, the division harvested approximately 150,000 hectares of crops. During 2010 the Company continued to execute its stated strategy of gradually increasing its land bank and at the end of the period it had around 280,000 hectares of land under control. At the same time, in 2010 the bulk of the Company’s harvest was generated from land that was under the Company’s control at the beginning of the year (total land bank as on December 31, 2009: 180,000 hectares, including 150,000 hectares in Grain Growing segment). MHP currently uses the majority of the grain it produces in its own operations. Revenue from the Grain division is attributable to the sale of a certain quantity of grain to third parties. The division’s costs primarily relate to raw materials, including seed, fertiliser and pesticides, payroll and related expenses, and the depreciation of agricultural machinery, equipment and buildings. MHP’s 2010 harvest was lower yielding than 2009 due to adverse weather conditions, but still signifi cantly higher than Ukraine’s average yields per hectare. Domestic price increase on crops was affected by lower yields worldwide and resulted in increased profi tability per hectare for MHP in 2010 compared to 2009. EBITDA per 1 hectare in 2010 increased by 52% to US$458 compared to US$301 in 2009. Other Agricultural Operations Revenue – Meat processing – Other IAS 41 standard gains Gross profi t Gross margin EBITDA EBITDA margin 2010 US$000 108,338 79,185 29,153 2,522 6,488 6.0% 9,323 8.6% 2009 US$00 88,109 60,116 27,993 704 3,460 3.9% 8,707 9.9% Growth rate % 23% 32% 4% 258% 88% 53% 7% (13%) MHP’s revenue in its Other Agricultural Operations division is generated from the sale of sausages and cooked meat, produced by Druzhba and Urkainian Bacon, and sales of beef, goose, foie gras, fruit and milk. Revenue from Other Agricultural Operations was US$108.3 million (2009: US$88.1 million) a 23% increase year-on-year. Following further expansion of Ukrainian Bacon facility. MHP’s sausage and cooked meat production volumes increased by 34% to 32,900 tonnes in 2010 compared to 24,600 tonnes in 2009. Average sausage and cooked meat prices during 2010 increased by 2% to UAH17.59 per kg excluding VAT (FY 2009: UAH 17.33 UAH per kg). MHP is a market leader in meat processing in Ukraine and management expects further increases in its market share (currently market share is about 10%). The cost of raw materials and other inventory used primarily consists of seeds, fertilisers, pesticides and veterinary medicines. In addition, costs include payroll expenses; depreciation of agricultural machinery, equipment and buildings; and fuel, electricity and natural gas used in the production process. 50% of the ingredients in product recipes is chicken, the rest being pork and/or beef. Divisional gross profi t reached US$6.5 million in 2010 (2009: US$3.5 million). Divisional EBITDA increased by 7% to US$9.3 million (2009: US$8.7 million) and EBITDA margin is 9% (2009: 10%). Liquidity and capital resources MHP’s cash fl ow from operating activities principally resulted from operating profi t adjusted for non-cash items, such as depreciation, and for changes in working capital. Cash generated from operating activities before change in working capital was US$263.2 million (2009: US$200.8 million). In 2010, the total increase in working capital was US$167 million. The main contributors to working capital were: — Purchasing of sunfl ower seeds stocks in 2010 through own cash and credit facilities while in 2009 the Company used forward contracts with Toepher (US$54m) — VAT related to intensive CAPEX programme (US$48m) — Increase in agricultural produce, mainly grains (US$22m) — Increase in inventories due to higher sunfl ower seeds price (US$19m) — Trade accounts receivables increased mainly due to higher chicken meat prices and increase in meat processing product sales (US$ 11 m) — Increase in biological assets in grain growing segment related to winter sowing campaign at larger area (US$9m) * For the Group, the sunfl ower oil is the by-product of fodder production. According to the Group accounting policy the cost of the by-products should equaled to the sales price. 33 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information US$57 million of our long-term debt is principally represented by loans, covered by ECA; it matures at various times up to 2018. US$30 million of our long-term debt is IFC and EBRD three year loans for fi nancing Company’s working capital needs. US$61 million represents fi nancing for the lease of agricultural machinery and equipment used in our grain growing activities and for vehicles for distribution, and has maturities up to 2015. The Net Debt/EBITDA ratio at the end of the period was 2.0 (Eurobond covenant: 2.5). As a hedge for currency risks, revenue from sunfl ower oil exports, sunfl ower husks and proceeds from export chicken meat and grain sales are used, fully covering debt service expenses. At the end of 2010 MHP had US$173.8 million in cash and short term bank deposits including approximately US$100 million nominated in US dollar. Outlook Consumer demand for poultry continues to be high and the Company’s production facilities are all operating at full capacity. Until production at Vinnytsia commences in 2013 our poultry production growth will be limited as operations are already at 100% capacity. So we are going to concentrate our efforts on increasing our share of value added products in our product mix. In grain growing segment in 2011 we increased land under cultivation to approximately 250,000 hectares compared to 150,000 hectares in 2010. We continue to increase the quantity of sausages and cooked meat products and produce a wider range of value-added products at our meat processing plants, with production at Ukrainian Bacon set to increase further. The CAPEX program in 2011 will be mostly related to construction and equipment purchases for the new Vinnytsia poultry production complex. The construction is on stream and to schedule. Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Cash fl ows Operating Activities Operating profi t before movements in working capital changes Change in working capital Net Cash generated from operating activities Investing Activities CAPEX Including non-cash investments Assets sale and other Deposits Net cash used in investing activites Financing Activities Net cash generated from fi nancing activities Including Treasury shares acquisition Net increase in cash and cash equivalents Effects of exchange rates Total change in cash 2010 US$000 2009 US$00 263,231 (166,651) 200,786 (77,724) 96,580 123,062 (222,819) 20,335 (190) (127,054) (329,728) (170,913) 26,607 717 17,722 (125,867) 250,150 (46,288) (28,176) 0 17,002 71 17,073 (30,981) (843) (31,824) In 2010 our total capital expenditure, of US$222.8 million was mostly related to the Vinnytsia project fi nancing as well as the expansion of land under control in the grain growing segment. Since the start of the Vinnytsia project fi nancing in the second half of 2010, approximately US$100.0 million was invested in the project. During 2010, the Company acquired, under the share buy-back programme, 3,370,144 shares for a cash consideration of US$46 million, of which 455,000 shares were further used for the compensation scheme. Debt Total Debt U.S.$, m Long Term Debt Short Term Debt Cash and bank deposits Net Debt LTM EBITDA Debt/LTM EBITDA Net Debt/LTM EBITDA 31.12.2010 31.12.2009 832 658 174 174 658 325 2.56 2.03 519 349 170 30 489 271 1.92 1.81 As at 31 December 2010, the Company’s total debt was approximately US$832 million, most of which was denominated in US dollars. The average weighted cost of debt was below 10%. MHP’s debt structure improved signifi cantly as a result of the successful completion of new Eurobond transaction. In 2010 MHP successfully issued US$330 million 10.25% senior notes due 2015 for an issue price of 101.452% of the principal amount (effective coupon rate 9.875%), in addition to approximately US$255 million 10.25% senior notes of exchange notes that were issued to exchange 96% of the outstanding US$250 million existing notes. Currently US$585 million of the debt (by nominal value) is in Eurobonds, which are not redeemable until April 2015. 34 Board of Directors Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Dr John C Rich, Age 59 Non-Executive Director Dr Rich joined the board in 2006. He is Managing Director of Australian Agricultural Nutrition and Consulting Pty Ltd (AANC) and is a specialist agri-business consultant for the IFC and IFC invested clients. From 1990 to 2003, he was an executive director of Austasia Pty Ltd, an agri-business conglomerate which has operations in Australia, South East Asia and China, and from 1995 to 2002 was a director of AN-OSI Pty Ltd, a company that specialised in supply-chain management for feedlot beef, poultry and dairy operations in Asia and Europe. Dr Rich holds a BSc and a BVSc from the University of Sydney, is a member of the Australian College of Veterinary Scientists and a registered fi nancial member of the Australian College of Veterinary Surgeons. He has completed a number of post-graduate courses in agricultural and food-related industries. John Grant, Age 65 Non-Executive Director Chairman of the Audit Committee Mr Grant is Chairman of Torotrak plc and Gas Turbine Effi ciency plc and is a non-executive director of Melrose plc and Pace plc. He was previously Chairman of Peter Stubs Limited, Hasgo Group Limited, the Royal Automobile Club Motor Sports Association Limited and Surion Energy Limited, and a non-executive director of National Grid plc and Corac Group plc. From 1992 to 1996, he was Finance Director of Lucas Industries plc and Lucas Varity plc, and before that was Director of Corporate Strategy for Ford Motor Company. Mr Grant holds a BSc in economics from Queen’s University, Belfast, and an MBA from Cranfi eld School of Management. Charles E Adriaenssen, Age 54 Chairman of the Nominations and Non-Executive Chairman Remunerations Committee Mr Adriaenssen joined the board as Chairman in 2006. He is founder and Chairman of CA & Partners SA, a consulting and management training company, Chairman of Outhere SA, an independent European classical music publisher, and Chairman of Bastille Investments, a private investment company. He is a member of the Board of Eurochem. He was between 2000 and 2004 a director of INTERBREW and, since 2000, a director of Rayvax SA, a holding company of ABINBEV. Between 1982 and 1995 he was a diplomat in Belgium’s Foreign Service. Mr Adriaenssen holds a BA in philosophy from the University of Vienna and a law degree from the University of Antwerp. Yuriy Kosyuk, Age 42 Chief Executive Offi cer Mr Kosyuk founded MHP in 1998 and is also the CEO of JSC MHP. In 1995 he founded the Business Centre for the Food Industry (BCFI) and was President until 1999. BCFI operated in the domestic and export markets for grain and other agricultural products. Mr Kosyuk graduated as a processing engineer in meat and milk production from the Kiev Food Industry Institute in 1992. Viktoria B Kapelyushnaya, Age 41 Chief Financial Offi cer Ms Kapelyushnaya, who is also Financial Director of JSC MHP, joined MHP in 1998 and was elected to the board in 2006. She was previously Deputy Chief Accountant, then Chief Accountant, of BCFI. She holds diplomas in meat processing engineering, 1992, and fi nancial auditing, 1998, from the Kiev Institute of Food Industry. Artur Futyma, Age 41 Director of Development Mr Futyma joined MHP in 1998 and was elected to the board in 2007. He was previously at BCFI. He is responsible for developing and managing new projects, and was a director of MHP’s agricultural department between 2001 and 2007. He graduated from the Kiev Institute of Food Industry in 1992 with a diploma in food machinery engineering. Yevhen H Shatokhin, Age 35 Director of Sales and Marketing Mr Shatokhin joined the MHP board in 2007. He was previously General Director of Druzhba. He graduated from the National University Kiev-Mohyla Academy in 1998 with a diploma in history and political science, and from the Kharkiv State Veterinary Academy in 2006 with a diploma in mechanical engineering. Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Corporate Governance 35 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information MHP is registered in Luxembourg. Its shares are listed on the London Stock Exchange. The Company complies with the non-binding principles on corporate governance contained in “Ten principles of corporate governance of the Luxembourg stock exchange” approved in October 2009. MHP has a clear and transparent corporate governance framework and provides adequate disclosure. also responsible for, among other things, reviewing the composition of the Board, making recommendations to the Board with regard to any changes, and is also authorised to carry out any other functions that may, from time to time, be delegated to it by the Board. Decisions are taken by a majority vote. In the event of an equal vote, the Chairman of the committee has the casting vote. Board of Directors During the year, the Board comprised: Charles E Adriaenssen, Non-executive Chairman, elected 30 May 2006 Yuriy A Kosyuk, Chief Executive Offi cer, elected 30 May 2006 Viktoria B Kapelyushnaya, Chief Financial Offi cer, elected 30 May 2006 Artur Futyma, elected 12 September 2007 Yevhen Shatokhin, elected 30 May 2006 Dr John C Rich, Non-executive Director, elected 30 May 2006 John Grant, Non-executive Director, elected 30 May 2006 Members of the Board are elected by a majority vote of shareholders at the Annual General Meeting (AGM), may be elected for a six-year period and may be re-elected an unlimited number of times. Of the Board’s seven directors, elected for a three-year term, three are independent. The term of offi ce of each member of the Board of Directors will expire at the Annual General Meeting stating on the annual accounts as of 31 December 2011. Each director has signed a letter of appointment with the Company which applies for as long as he or she remains a director. The letters do not provide for any benefi ts on termination of directorship and, in the case of Mr Adriaenssen, Dr Rich and Mr Grant, provide for payment of compensation and the reimbursement of certain expenses. Ms Kapelyushnaya, Mr Futyma and Mr Shatokhin do not receive compensation for their service as directors and any expenses incurred are reimbursed by JSC MHP or the relevant subsidiary. The terms and conditions for Mr Kosyuk’s appointment as Chief Executive Offi cer (CEO) were agreed and signed on 21 June 2006. The terms are for the duration of his offi ce and do not provide for any benefi ts on termination of his directorship. Mr Kosyuk may, however, resign from his position as Chief Executive Offi cer only subject to a prior three-months’ notice. The terms contain confi dentiality obligations applicable to Mr Kosyuk for a period of fi ve years after termination of his offi ce. The amount of remuneration and benefi ts paid by the Company to the persons responsible for the day-to-day management of the Company is reported by the Board of Directors to the AGM. The amount of remuneration and benefi ts of all members of the Board of Directors, including the Chief Executive Offi cer, regardless of whether such remuneration is paid by the Company or by any other entity within the group, is established by the Nominations and Remuneration Committee. In addition, the amount of remuneration paid to non-executive directors is approved by the AGM. Nominations and Remuneration Committee Charles E Adriaenssen, Chairman John Grant Dr John C Rich The committee’s responsibilities include the consideration of the award of stock options to any member of the Board of directors and all matters relating to the remuneration and benefi ts paid to all members of the Board, including the CEO, regardless of whether that is paid by the Company or any other entity in the group. It is Audit Committee John Grant, Chairman Viktoria B Kapelyushnaya Dr John C Rich The committee is authorised to carry out its functions as may, from time to time, be delegated to it by the Board of Directors, relating to the oversight of audit functions, fi nancial reporting and internal control principles, and the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the Company’s independent auditors. Decisions are taken by a majority vote. In the event of an equal vote, the Chairman of the committee has the casting vote. Audit remuneration Audit remuneration amounted US$1.0 million, US$1.0 million and US$1.5 million in 2010, 2009 and 2008 respectively. Audit remuneration is mainly attributable to the audit services, services provided in respect of IPO in 2008 and bonds issued in 2010. Audit remuneration also includes tax consulting fees around of US$0.1 million per year. Internal Control/Risk Management MHP complies with the non-binding principles on corporate governance of the Luxembourg Stock Exchange. The internal control function is responsible for fi nancial reporting and operating controls matters and reports to the CEO and CFO. The Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing internal control and risk management, and for monitoring its effectiveness. Financial reporting process MHP has in place a comprehensive fi nancial review cycle, which includes a detailed annual budgeting process where the Group prepares budgets for review and approval by the Board of Directors, as well as forecasts of the fi nancial performance during the year as based on the updates to the actual results. At the Group level, MHP has in place common accounting policies and procedures on fi nancial reporting and closing. Management monitors the publication of the new reporting standards and works closely with the external auditors in evaluating in advance the potential impact of these standards. Compensation of Key Management Personnel Total compensation of the Group’s key management personnel included primarily in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income amounted to US$ 15,514 thousand, US$ 8,652 thousand and US$ 12,009 thousand for the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Compensation to key management personnel consists of contractual salary and performance bonuses; during the year ended 31 December 2010 compensation to key management personnel included a one-off bonus to one of the top managers in the amount of US$ 7,628 thousand. 36 Corporate Governance continued Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Litigation Statement on the Directors and Offi cers At the date of this Annual Report, no member of the Board of Directors or of MHP’s senior management had, for at least fi ve years: from acting as a member of the administrative, management or supervisory bodies of a company, or from acting in the management or conduct of the affairs of a company. 1. any convictions relating to fraudulent offences; 2. been a senior manager or a member of the administrative or supervisory bodies of any company at the time of, or preceding, any bankruptcy, receivership or liquidation; or 3. been subject to any offi cial public incrimination and/or sanction by any statutory or regulatory authority (including any designated professional body) nor had ever been disqualifi ed by a court Share Options At the date of this annual report, neither the Company nor JSC MHP has a share option plan and no share options have been granted to members of the Board of Directors, members of MHP’s senior management or employees. MHP is currently considering various compensation structures and may consider establishing such a plan and granting share options in the future. Directors report The directors present their annual report and audited fi nancial statements for the year ended 31 December 2010. Principal Activities and Review of the Business MHP is one of the leading agro-industrial companies, and the largest producer of chicken, in Ukraine. The business, run on a vertically-integrated principle with the objective of making it self-suffi cient, is structured into three segments: Poultry and Related Operations, Grain Growing Operations, and Other Agricultural Operations. Poultry segment This division produces and sells chicken products, sunfl ower oil, mixed fodder and convenience foods. It incorporates four chicken and two breeder farms, feed mills, and convenience foods facilities. Grain segment This division grows crops for fodder, and for sale to third parties, on 150,000 hectares of land. It incorporates a number of arable farms and grain storage facilities. Other Agricultural Operations segment This division produces and sells sausages and cooked meat, beef, goose and foie gras, and fruits. It incorporates one mixed farm, a goose farm and two facilities for producing prepared meat products. More information about the operations of the business is set out in the Chairman’s Statement on pages 8 and 9, the Chief Executive Offi cer’s review on pages 10 to 12, and the Business review on pages 14 to 23. Future Developments The Group’s strategy is: — to expand its capacity through construction of green-fi eld projects to produce chicken and chicken products in a domestic market which has a 46 million population and one of the world’s lowest rates of meat consumption per capita; — to expand its grain production to 400,000 hectares by 2015 to provide stability in the ingredients for fodder; — to increase the effi ciency of its grain production through modernisation and use of up-to-date technology; — to reduce costs and improve quality control by increasing vertical-integration; — to maintain, and improve, its high biosecurity standards; — to promote and develop its strong brands through consumer- driven innovation; — to increase its presence in value-added food products, such as processed meat and convenience food; and — to continue to develop its distribution network and customer base, including development of export markets. The management believes there is ample opportunity for growth as customers choose to buy domestically-produced chicken, which is cheaper and fresher than imported meat. Going Concern After reviewing the 2010 budget and longer-term plans, the directors are satisfi ed that, at the time of the approval of the fi nancial statements, it was appropriate to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the fi nancial statements of the group. Directors in the year The following served as directors of the Company during the year ended 31 December 2010. Charles E Adriaenssen, Non-executive Chairman Yuriy Kosyuk, Chief Executive Offi cer Viktoria B Kapelyushnaya, Chief Financial Offi cer Artur Futyma, Deputy CEO Yevhen H Shatokhin, Deputy Chairman, Head of Sales Dr John C Rich, Non-executive Director John Grant, Non-executive Director The directors’ biographies are on page 34 of this report. Election and re-election of Directors Details of the procedure for election and re-election of directors is in the Corporate Governance report on page 35 of this report. Annual General Meeting (AGM) The AGM will be held at the Company’s registered offi ce in Luxembourg at 27 April 2011. Disclosure of Information to Auditors So far as each director is aware, all information which is relevant to the audit of the group’s fi nancial statements has been supplied to the group’s auditors. Each director has taken all steps that he/she ought to have taken in his/her duty as a director in order to make himself/herself aware of any relevant audit information, and to establish that the group’s auditors are aware of that information. Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Statement of the Board of Directors’ responsibilities for the preparation and approval of the fi nancial statements for the year ended 31 december 2010 37 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information The Board of Directors is responsible for the preparation of the consolidated fi nancial statements that present fairly the consolidated fi nancial position of MHP S.A. and its subsidiaries (the “Group”) as of 31 December 2010 and the consolidated results of its operations, cash fl ows and changes in equity for the year then ended, in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union (“IFRS”). In preparing the consolidated fi nancial statements, the Board of Directors is responsible for: — Properly selecting and applying accounting policies; — Presenting information, including accounting policies, in a manner that provides relevant, reliable, comparable and understandable information; — Providing additional disclosures when compliance with the specifi c requirements in IFRSs are insuffi cient to enable users to understand the impact of particular transactions, other events and conditions on the Group’s consolidated fi nancial position and fi nancial performance; — Making an assessment of the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Board of Directors, within its competencies, is also responsible for: — Designing, implementing and maintaining an effective and sound system of internal controls, throughout the Group; — Maintaining adequate accounting records that are suffi cient to show and explain the Group’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the consolidated fi nancial position of the Group, and which enable them to ensure that the consolidated fi nancial statements of the Group comply with IFRS; — Maintaining statutory accounting records in compliance with local legislation and accounting standards in the respective jurisdictions; — Taking such steps as are reasonably available to them to safeguard the assets of the Group; and — Preventing and detecting fraud and other irregularities. The consolidated fi nancial statements of the Group for the year ended 31 December 2010 were authorised for issue by the Board of Directors on 25 March 2011. On behalf of the Board Yuriy Kosyuk Chief Executive Offi cer Viktoria Kapelyushnaya Chief Financial Offi cer 38 Independent auditors’ report Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 To the shareholders of MHP S.A. 5, rue Guillaume Kroll L-1882 Luxembourg Report on the consolidated fi nancial statements We have audited the consolidated fi nancial statements of MHP S.A., which comprise the consolidated balance sheet as of 31 December 2010, and the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, the consolidated statement of cash fl ows and the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders’ equity for the year then ended, and a summary of signifi cant accounting policies and other explanatory notes. Board of Directors’ responsibility for the consolidated fi nancial statements The board of Directors is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these consolidated fi nancial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union. This responsibility includes: designing, implementing and maintaining internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated fi nancial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; selecting and applying appropriate accounting policies; and making accounting estimates that are reasonable in the circumstances. Independent auditors’ responsibility Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated fi nancial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing as adopted for Luxembourg by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier. Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the consolidated fi nancial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated fi nancial statements. The procedures selected depend on the independent auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated fi nancial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the independent auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the consolidated fi nancial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the Board of Directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated fi nancial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is suffi cient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion. Opinion In our opinion, the consolidated fi nancial statements give a true and fair view of the fi nancial position of MHP S.A. as of 31 December 2010, and of its fi nancial performance and its cash fl ows for the year then ended in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union. Report on other legal and regulatory requirements The directors’ report, which is the responsibility of the Board of Directors, is consistent with the consolidated fi nancial statements. For Deloitte S.A., Cabinet de révision agréé Sophie Mitchell, Réviseur d’entreprises agréé Partner March 25, 2011 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Consolidated balance sheet As of 31 December 2010 (in US Dollars and in thousands) Assets Non-current assets Property, plant and equipment, net Land lease rights, net Deferred tax assets Long-term VAT recoverable, net Non-current biological assets Other non-current assets Total non-current assets Current assets Inventories Biological assets Agricultural produce Other current assets, net Taxes recoverable and prepaid, net Trade accounts receivable, net Short-term bank deposits Cash and cash equivalents Total current assets Total assets Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity Equity attributable to equity holders of the parent Share capital Treasury shares Additional paid-in capital Revaluation reserve Cumulative translation differences Retained earnings Non-controlling interest Total equity Non-current liabilities Long-term bank borrowings Bonds issued Long-term fi nance lease obligations Other long-term payables Deferred tax liabilities Total non-current liabilities Current liabilities Trade accounts payable Other current liabilities Short-term bank borrowings and current portion of long-term bank borrowings Current portion of bonds issued Interest accrued Current portion of fi nance lease obligations Total current liabilities Total liabilities Contingencies and contractual commitments Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity On behalf of the Board Yuriy Kosyuk Chief Executive Offi cer Viktoria Kapelyushnaya Chief Financial Offi cer The notes on pages 44 to 79 form an integral part of these consolidated fi nancial statements. Independent auditors’ report is on page 38. 39 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information Notes 2010 2009 2008 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 12 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 10 25 26 22 23 24 28 744,965 23,216 5,190 24,017 43,288 14,251 634,269 854 10,183 20,670 36,235 8,717 539,833 572 2,047 9,112 29,480 5,886 854,927 710,928 586,930 113,491 135,410 113,850 21,331 107,824 53,395 134,460 39,321 92,260 112,978 66,227 15,297 66,958 43,377 7,632 22,248 38,118 84,095 42,765 15,370 46,338 31,531 25,342 54,072 719,082 426,977 337,631 1,574,009 1,137,905 924,561 284,505 (40,555) 179,565 18,781 (237,751) 436,439 284,505 – 178,815 18,781 (238,521) 231,044 284,505 – 178,815 9,410 (222,699) 82,480 640,984 29,384 474,624 19,784 332,511 13,706 670,368 494,408 346,217 58,426 562,886 36,988 401 2,502 56,043 248,046 44,546 310 8,970 57,456 246,903 47,972 400 6,160 661,203 357,915 358,891 19,012 38,042 140,092 9,892 11,573 23,827 72,380 45,428 139,790 – 3,526 24,458 22,170 41,897 130,241 – 3,520 21,625 242,438 285,582 219,453 903,641 643,497 578,344 1,574,009 1,137,905 924,561 40 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Consolidated statement of comprehensive income For the year ended 31 December 2010 (in US Dollars and in thousands, except per share data) Continuing operations Revenue Net change in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce Cost of sales Gross profi t Selling, general and administrative expenses VAT refunds and other government grants income Other operating expenses, net Operating profi t before loss on impairment of property, plant and equipment Loss on impairment of property, plant and equipment Operating profi t Finance costs, net Finance income Foreign exchange gains/(losses), net Other (expenses)/income Gain realised from acquisitions and changes in non-controlling interest in subsidiaries, net Other expenses, net Profi t before tax Income tax (expense)/benefi t Profi t for the year from continuing operations Discontinued operations Loss for the year from discontinued operations, net of income tax Profi t for the year Other comprehensive income Effect of revaluation of property, plant and equipment Deferred tax charged directly to revaluation reserve Cumulative translation difference Other comprehensive income/(loss) for the year, net of tax Total comprehensive income/(loss) for the year Profi t attributable to: Equity holders of the Parent Non-controlling interest Total comprehensive income/(loss) attributable to: Equity holders of the Parent Non-controlling interest Earnings per share From continuing operations (US$ per share): Basic and diluted From continuing and discontinued operations (US$ per share): Basic and diluted On behalf of the Board Yuriy Kosyuk Chief Executive Offi cer Viktoria Kapelyushnaya Chief Financial Offi cer The notes on pages 44 to 79 form an integral part of these consolidated fi nancial statements. Independent auditors’ report is on page 38. Notes 2010 2009 2008 30, 5 5 31 32 27 33 8 34 29 2 10 944,206 29,014 (680,637) 292,583 (102,107) 82,058 (15,750) 256,784 – 711,004 35,236 (499,163) 802,910 6,327 (571,710) 247,077 (80,972) 67,812 (14,633) 219,284 (1,304) 237,527 (80,495) 107,663 (9,422) 255,273 (11,767) 256,784 217,980 243,506 (62,944) 13,309 10,965 (793) – (50,817) 3,823 (23,580) 696 5,413 (51,663) 6,695 (187,127) 301 4,482 (39,463) (64,465) (227,312) 217,321 (1,873) 153,515 6,488 16,194 (1,279) 215,448 160,003 14,915 6 – – (9,722) 215,448 160,003 5,193 – – 770 770 11,912 (2,541) (15,822) – – (228,991) (6,451) (228,991) 216,218 153,552 (223,798) 205,395 10,053 148,564 11,439 1,518 3,675 206,165 10,053 142,113 11,439 (227,473) 3,675 1.88 1.88 1.34 1.34 0.11 0.01 37 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Consolidated statement of changes in shareholders’ equity For the year ended 31 December 2010 41 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information (in US Dollars and in thousands) Share capital Treasury shares Attributable to Equity Holders of the Parent Additional paid-in capital Revaluation reserve Cumulative translation differences Retained earnings Total Non- controlling interest Total equity 1 January 2008 251,311 Profi t for the year Other comprehensive income Total comprehensive income for the year Increase in share capital (net of issue costs) (Note 21) Acquisition and changes in non-controlling interest in subsidiaries (Note 2) 31 December 2008 Profi t for the year Other comprehensive income Total comprehensive income for the year Acquisition and changes in non-controlling interest in subsidiaries (Note 2) – – – 33,194 – 284,505 – – – – 31 December 2009 284,505 Profi t for the year Other comprehensive income Total comprehensive income for the year Acquisition of treasury shares (Note 21) Treasury shares disposed of under a compensation scheme (Note 21) Dividends declared by subsidiary – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – (46,288) 5,733 – 60,059 9,410 6,292 80,962 408,034 11,372 419,406 – – – 118,756 – – – – – – – (228,991) 1,518 – 1,518 (228,991) 3,675 – 5,193 (228,991) (228,991) 1,518 (227,473) 3,675 (223,798) – – – – 151,950 – 151,950 – (1,341) (1,341) 178,815 9,410 (222,699) 82,480 332,511 13,706 346,217 – – – – – 9,371 – (15,822) 148,564 – 148,564 (6,451) 11,439 – 160,003 (6,451) 9,371 (15,822) 148,564 142,113 11,439 153,552 – – – – (5,361) (5,361) 178,815 18,781 (238,521) 231,044 474,624 19,784 494,408 – – – – 750 – – – – – – – – 770 205,395 – 205,395 770 10,053 – 215,448 770 770 205,395 206,165 10,053 216,218 – – – – – – (46,288) – (46,288) 6,483 – – (453) 6,483 (453) 31 December 2010 284,505 (40,555) 179,565 18,781 (237,751) 436,439 640,984 29,384 670,368 On behalf of the Board Yuriy Kosyuk Chief Executive Offi cer Viktoria Kapelyushnaya Chief Financial Offi cer The notes on pages 44 to 79 form an integral part of these consolidated fi nancial statements. Independent auditors’ report is on page 38. 42 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Consolidated statement of cash fl ows For the year ended 31 December 2010 (in US Dollars and in thousands) Operating activities Profi t before tax from continuing and discontinued operations Adjustments to reconcile profi t to net cash provided by operations Depreciation and amortisation expense Finance costs, net Finance income Net change in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce Loss on disposal of discontinued operation Gain realised from acquisitions and changes in non-controlling interest in subsidiaries, net Foreign exchange (gains)/losses, net Change in allowance for irrecoverable amounts and direct write-offs Impairment of property, plant and equipment Loss/(gain) on disposal of property, plant and equipment Bonus to key management personnel settled in treasury shares Operating profi t before working capital changes Increase in inventories Increase in biological assets Increase in agricultural produce (Increase)/decrease in other current assets Increase in taxes recoverable and prepaid Increase in trade accounts receivable Increase/(decrease) in other long-term payables (Decrease)/increase in trade accounts payable Increase in other current liabilities Cash generated by operations Finance costs paid Interest received Income tax paid Net cash generated by operating activities Investing activities Purchases of property, plant and equipment Acquisition of land lease rights Purchases of other non-current assets Proceeds from disposal of subsidiary, net of cash disposed Proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment Purchases of non-current biological assets Acquisition of subsidiaries, net of cash acquired Financing provided in relation to acquisition of subsidiaries Investments in short-term deposits Withdrawals of short-term deposits Loans provided to employees, net Loans (repaid by)/provided to related parties, net Net cash used in investing activities 2010 2009 2008 217,321 153,515 6,472 67,902 62,944 (13,309) (29,014) – – (10,965) 8,264 – 1,931 6,483 51,677 50,817 (3,823) (35,236) – (5,413) 23,580 9,594 1,304 (8) – 57,394 51,663 (6,695) (4,945) 6,193 (4,482) 187,127 5,873 11,767 1,145 – 311,557 246,007 311,512 (19,407) (9,423) (21,768) (5,130) (47,919) (10,744) 77 (52,516) 179 144,906 (58,134) 12,924 (3,116) (55,679) (17,160) (8,767) 439 (42,340) (14,459) (66) 48,051 12,257 168,283 (47,494) 3,737 (1,464) (12,106) (23,066) (44,603) (726) (39,759) (25,480) (2,523) (976) 8,683 170,956 (51,861) 5,976 (2,353) 96,580 123,062 122,718 (139,157) (4,767) (2,883) – 703 (3,610) (38,659) (13,408) (164,662) 37,608 (993) 100 (135,257) – (3,445) – 1,545 (5,604) – – (7,608) 25,330 (758) (70) (179,695) – (2,688) (17) 3,957 (1,462) 456 (17,432) (57,711) 42,130 (1,022) (136) (329,728) (125,867) (213,620) Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Consolidated statement of cash fl ows For the year ended 31 December 2010 (continued) (in US Dollars and in thousands) Financing activities Proceeds from loans received Repayment of bank loans Proceeds from corporate bonds issued, net of issue costs Repayments of corporate bonds issued Finance lease payments Proceeds from other fi nancing received Repayment of other fi nancing Issue of share capital, net of issue costs Dividends paid by subsidiary to non-controlling shareholders Acquisition of treasury shares Net cash generated by/(used in) fi nancing activities Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year Effect of translation to presentation currency and exchange rate changes on the balance of cash and cash equivalents held in foreign currencies Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year On behalf of the Board Yuriy Kosyuk Chief Executive Offi cer Viktoria Kapelyushnaya Chief Financial Offi cer The notes on pages 44 to 79 form an integral part of these consolidated fi nancial statements. Independent auditors’ report is on page 38. 43 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information 2010 2009 2008 565,134 (560,309) 323,018 – (24,532) – (6,420) – (453) (46,288) 447,037 (446,068) – – (22,957) 6,366 (12,554) – – – 274,618 (238,716) – (41,288) (18,544) 13,846 – 151,950 – – 250,150 (28,176) 141,866 17,002 (30,981) 50,964 22,248 54,072 10,088 71 (843) (6,980) 39,321 22,248 54,072 44 44 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements For the year ended 31 December 2010 (in US Dollars and in thousands) 1. Description of the business MHP S.A. (the “Parent” or “MHP S.A.”), a limited liability company registered under the laws of Luxembourg, was formed on 30 May 2006. MHP S.A. was formed to serve as the ultimate holding company of OJSC “Myronivsky Hliboproduct” (“MHP”) and its subsidiaries. Hereinafter, MHP S.A. and its subsidiaries are referred to as the “MHP S.A. Group” or the “Group”. The registered address of MHP S.A. is 5, rue Guillaume Kroll, L-1822 Luxembourg. The controlling shareholder of MHP S.A. is the Chief Executive Offi cer of MHP S.A. Mr. Yuriy Kosyuk (“Principal Shareholder”), who owns 100% of the shares of WTI Trading Limited (“WTI”), which is the immediate majority shareholder of MHP S.A. The principal business activities of the Group are poultry and related operations, grain growing, as well as other agricultural operations, meat processing, cultivation and selling fruits and producing beef and meat products ready for consumption). The Group’s poultry and related operations integrate all functions related to the production of chicken, including hatching, fodder manufacturing, raising chickens to marketable age (“grow-out”), processing and marketing of branded chilled products and include the production and sale of chicken products, sunfl ower oil, mixed fodder and convenience food products. Grain growing comprises the production and sale of grains. Other agricultural operations comprise the production and sale of cooked meat, sausages, beef, milk, goose meat, foie gras, fruits and feed grains. During each of the years presented in these fi nancial statements, the Group employed over 22,000 people. The Group has been undertaking a large-scale investment programme to expand its poultry and related operations, with the fi rst launch in 2007 of Myronivska poultry farm. In June 2009, the Group completed the stage two of Myronivska poultry complex, which reached full production capacity during the third quarter of 2009. In May 2010 the Group also commenced construction of the greenfi eld Vinnytsia poultry complex. During the year ended 31 December 2010 the Group substantially increased its agricultural land bank as part of its vertical integration and diversifi cation strategy through acquisitions of land lease rights (Note 9). The Group’s operational facilities are located in different regions of Ukraine, including Kyiv, Cherkasy, Dnipropetrovsk, Donetsk, Ivano- Frankivsk, Vinnytsia, Kherson, Sumy, Khmelnitsk regions and Autonomous Republic of Crimea. The primary subsidiaries and the principal activities of the companies forming the Group as of 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008 were as follows (for details of changes see Note 2): Operating entity MHP S.A. Raftan Holding Limited (“RHL”) MHP Country of registration Luxembourg Republic of Cyprus Ukraine Myronivsky Zavod po Vygotovlennyu Krup i Ukraine Kombikormiv (“MZVKK”) Peremoga Nova (“Peremoga”) Druzhba Narodiv Nova (“Druzhba Nova”) Oril-Leader (“Oril”) Tavriysky Kombikormovy Zavod (“TKZ”) Ptahofabryka Shahtarska Nova (“Shahtarska”) Myronivska Pticefabrica (“Myronivska”) Starynska Ptahofabryka (“Starynska”) Ptahofabryka Snyatynska Nova (“Snyatynska”) Zernoproduct Katerynopilsky Elevator Druzhba Narodiv (“Druzhba”) Crimean Fruit Company (“Crimean Fruit”) NPF Urozhay (“Urozhay”) Agrofort (“AGF”) Urozhayna Krayina Ukrainian Bacon Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine Year established/ acquired 2006 2006 1998 1998 1999 2002 2003 2004 2003 2004 2003 2005 2005 2005 2006 2006 2006 2006 2010 2008 Effective ownership interest*, % Principal activity 2010 2009 2008 Holding company Sub-holding company Parent 100 Parent 100 Parent 100 Management, marketing and sales Fodder and sunfl ower oil production Chicken farm Chicken farm Chicken farm Fodder production Breeder farm Chicken farm Breeder farm Geese breeder farm Fodder grain cultivation Fodder production, grain storage and sunfl ower oil production Cattle breeding, plant cultivation Fruits and fodder grain cultivation Fodder grain cultivation Fodder grain cultivation Fodder grain cultivation Meat processing 99.9 88.5 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.9 94.9 99.9 89.9 99.9 99.9 81.9 89.9 86.1 99.9 79.9 99.9 88.5 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.9 94.9 99.9 89.9 99.9 99.9 81.9 89.9 86.1 N/A 79.9 99.9 88.5 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.9 99.9 84.9 99.9 89.9 99.9 99.0 81.9 89.9 86.1 N/A 79.9 * Effective voting rights in subsidiaries did not differ from effective ownership rights. Direct ownership interest in subsidiaries by the Parent differs from the effective ownership interest due to cross holdings between subsidiaries. Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 45 45 Overview Overview Business review Business review Management & Governance Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Financial Statements & Notes Other information Other information 2. Changes in the group structure Detailed below is the information on acquisitions and disposals of subsidiaries, as well as changes in non-controlling interests in subsidiaries of the Group during the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008. Acquisitions 2010 acquisitions in grain growing segment During the year ended 31 December 2010, the Group acquired from third parties 100% interests in a number of entities engaged in grain growing activities. The transactions were accounted for under the acquisition method. The Group’s effective ownership interest in these subsidiaries upon the acquisition and as of 31 December 2010 was 99.9%. The fair value of the net assets acquired was as follows: Property, plant and equipment Land lease rights Non-current biological assets Agricultural produce Biological assets Inventories Taxes recoverable and prepaid Trade accounts receivable Cash and cash equivalents Total assets Accounts payable to the Group Trade accounts payable Other current liabilities Total liabilities Net assets acquired Fair value of the consideration transferred Goodwill (Note 13) Cash consideration paid Cash acquired Net cash infl ow arising on the acquisition 16,463 18,801 3,482 5,274 5,827 1,076 1,086 113 54 52,176 (13,408) (1,656) (981) (16,045) 36,131 (38,943) 2,812 (38,713) 54 (38,659) Goodwill arising on the acquisitions of these subsidiaries is attributable to the benefi ts of expected synergies and future development of the grain growing activities. Ukrainian Bacon In July 2008, the Group acquired from a third party a 80.0% interest in Ukrainian Bacon, a meat processing company. The transaction was accounted for under the acquisition method. The Group’s effective ownership interest in Ukrainian Bacon upon the acquisition and as of 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008 was 79.9%. 46 46 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements continued For the year ended 31 December 2010 (in US Dollars and in thousands) 2. Changes in the group structure continued The fair value of the net assets acquired was as follows: Property, plant and equipment Prepayments for property, plant and equipment Other non-current assets Taxes recoverable and prepaid Other current assets Trade accounts receivable Accounts receivable from the Group Inventories Cash and cash equivalents Total assets Deferred tax liabilities Trade accounts payable Accounts payable to the Group Other current liabilities Total liabilities Net assets acquired Fair value of net assets attributable to 80% ownership interest Fair value of the consideration transferred Gain realised upon acquisition Cash consideration transferred Cash acquired Net cash infl ow arising on the acquisition 28,737 662 302 3,492 2,605 107 732 1,408 456 38,501 (2,630) (7,501) (20,344) (2,989) (33,464) 5,037 4,030 (469) 3,561 – 456 456 The gain realised upon acquisition was recognised within Gain realised from acquisitions and changes in non-controlling interest in subsidiaries for the year ended 31 December 2008. “Pro forma” results of Acquisitions – “Pro forma” revenue and profi t from continuing operations for the year ended 31 December 2010, had the transactions related to acquisitions as discussed above, occurred on 1 January 2010 would have been US$957,497 thousand and US$217,734 thousand, respectively. “Pro forma” earnings per share would have been US$1.9 per share. “Pro forma” revenue and profi t from continuing operations for the year ended 31 December 2008, had the acquisition of Ukrainian Bacon been completed on 1 January 2008, would have been US$809,358 thousand and US$3,793 thousand, respectively. “Pro forma” earnings per share for the year ended 31 December 2008 would have been US$0.11 and US$0.01 per share from continuing and continuing and discontinued operations, respectively. These “pro forma” revenue and profi t for the year from continuing operations do not refl ect any adjustments related to other transactions. “Pro forma” results represent an approximate measure of the performance of the combined group on an annualised basis. The unaudited “pro forma” information does not purport to represent what the Group’s fi nancial position or results of operations would actually have been if these transactions had occurred at such dates or to project the Group’s future results of operations. Disposal of subsidiaries Kyivska In December 2008, prior to the sale of its interest, the Group increased the share capital of Kyivska, a cattle breeding farm, which resulted in an increase in the Group’s effective ownership to 99.7%. The transaction did not have effect on the non-controlling interests due to negative net assets of Kyivska as of the date of the transaction. In December 2008, the Group sold its voting rights in Kyivska to a third party for a consideration of US$974 thousand, receivable in cash during the period from 2011 to 2017. The fair value of the consideration receivable was determined at US$341 thousand which is the present value of the expected future cash fl ows. Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Assets and liabilities of Kyivska as of the date of disposal were as follows: 47 47 Overview Overview Business review Business review Management & Governance Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Financial Statements & Notes Other information Other information Property, plant and equipment, net Biological assets Agricultural produce Amounts receivable from the Group Inventories Taxes recoverable and prepaid, net Cash and cash equivalents Total assets Accounts payable to the Group Trade accounts payable Other current liabilities Total liabilities Net assets disposed Group’s share in net assets disposed (99.8%) Fair value of consideration receivable Loss on disposal Cash consideration received Cash disposed Net cash outfl ow arising on the disposal 3,709 1,723 1,507 8,300 224 1,123 17 16,603 (9,315) (501) (240) (10,056) 6,547 6,534 (341) (6,193) – (17) (17) The disposal of Kyivska was accounted for in these consolidated fi nancial statements as a discontinued operation (Note 6). The loss realised on disposal of Kyivska in the amount of US$6,193 thousand was recognised in these consolidated fi nancial statements in Loss for the year from discontinued operations, net of income tax. Kyivska assets and liabilities were presented in these consolidated fi nancial statements within the other agricultural business segment. Changes in non-controlling interests in subsidiaries Druzhba In August 2008, Druzhba decreased its share capital by repurchasing shares from a number of its minority shareholders, which resulted in an increase of the Group’s effective ownership in Druzhba from 95.3% to 99.0%. Consideration payable to the minority shareholders in exchange for the shares in the amount of US$1,744 thousand was determined based on the respective shareholder’s share in the net assets of Druzhba, as recorded in the statutory fi nancial statements as of the date of transaction, and was payable in cash or in kind, depending on the agreements reached with each shareholder. The excess of the fair value of the acquired share over the consideration payable of US$161 thousand was recognised in these consolidated fi nancial statements in Gain realised from acquisitions and changes in non-controlling interest in subsidiaries. In September 2009, as a result of transfer of treasury shares held by Druzhba to MHP, the Group increased its effective ownership in Druzhba to 99.9%. The gain on the transfer in the amount of US$304 thousand was recognised in these consolidated fi nancial statements in Gain realised from acquisitions and changes in non-controlling interest in subsidiaries. MHP In September 2008 the Group increased the share capital of MHP, which resulted in the Group owning 99.9% in MHP as of 31 December 2008. The gain on the transaction in the amount of US$718 thousand was recognised in these consolidated fi nancial statements in Gain realised from acquisitions and changes in non-controlling interest in subsidiaries. MZVKK During the year ended 31 December 2008, through a series of transactions, the Group increased its effective share in MZVKK from 84.7% to 88.5%. The excess of the fair value of the share of the net assets acquired over the purchase price in the amount of US$42 thousand was recognised in these consolidated fi nancial statements in Gain realised from acquisitions and changes in non-controlling interest in subsidiaries. Starynska In April 2009 the Group increased the share capital of Starynska by US$2,594 thousand, which resulted in dilution of the non-controlling interest. As a result, the Group’s effective ownership interest increased to 94.9%. The resulting effect of change in non-controlling interest in the amount of US$5,107 thousand was recognised in these consolidated fi nancial statements in Gain realised from acquisitions and changes in non-controlling interest in subsidiaries. Other The Group made other insignifi cant acquisitions during each of the periods presented. These acquisitions have been accounted for based on the Group’s accounting policies. The impact of these acquisitions was not signifi cant to the consolidated fi nancial statements of the Group. 48 48 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements continued For the year ended 31 December 2010 (in US Dollars and in thousands) 3. Summary of signifi cant accounting policies Basis of presentation and accounting − The consolidated fi nancial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as adopted by the European Union (“IFRS”). The operating subsidiaries of the Group maintain their accounting records under Ukrainian Accounting Standards (“UAS”). UAS principles and procedures may differ from those generally accepted under IFRS. Accordingly, the consolidated fi nancial statements, which have been prepared from the Group entities’ UAS records, refl ect adjustments necessary for such fi nancial statements to be presented in accordance with IFRS. The consolidated fi nancial statements of the Group are prepared on the historical cost basis, except for revalued amounts of property, plant and equipment, biological assets, agricultural produce and certain fi nancial instruments. Adoption of new and revised International Financial Reporting Standards – The following new and revised Standards and Interpretations have been adopted in the current year: — IFRS 3 “Business Combinations” (Revised 2008) — IAS 27 “Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements” (Revised 2008) — IFRS 1 “First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (Revised 2008) — IFRIC 17 “Distributions of Non-cash Assets to Owners” — Amendment to IAS 39 “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement” – Eligible Hedged Items (July 2008) — Amendments to IFRIC 9 “Reassessment of Embedded Derivatives” and IAS 39 “Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement” IFRS 3 “Business Combinations” (Revised 2008) has been applied effective 1 January 2010 prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after 1 January 2010 in accordance with the relevant transitional provisions. The most signifi cant changes affecting the Group’s accounting policies are as follows: — IFRS 3 (Revised 2008) allows a choice on a transaction-by-transaction basis for the measurement of non-controlling interests at the date of acquisition (previously referred to as “minority” interests) either at fair value or at the non-controlling interests’ share of recognised identifi able net assets of the acquired subsidiary. — IFRS 3 (Revised 2008) changes the recognition and subsequent accounting for contingent consideration. Previously, contingent consideration was recognised at the acquisition date only if payment of the contingent consideration was probable and it could be measured reliably; any subsequent adjustments to the contingent consideration were always made against the cost of the acquisition. Under the revised Standard, contingent consideration is measured at fair value at the acquisition date; subsequent adjustments to the consideration are recognised against the cost of the acquisition only to the extent that they arise from new information obtained within the measurement period (a maximum of twelve months from the acquisition date) about the fair value at the date of acquisition. All other subsequent adjustments to contingent consideration are recognised in profi t or loss. — IFRS 3 (Revised 2008) requires the recognition of a settlement gain or loss when the business combination in effect settles a pre- existing relationship between the Group and the acquired subsidiary. — IFRS 3 (Revised 2008) requires acquisition-related costs to be accounted for separately from the business combination, generally leading to those costs being recognised as an expense in profi t or loss as incurred, whereas previously they were accounted for as part of the cost of the acquisition. The application of IAS 27 “Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements” (Revised 2008) resulted in changes in the Group’s accounting policies for changes in ownership interests in subsidiaries, which were applied prospectively from 1 January 2010 in accordance with the relevant transitional provisions: — In prior years, in the absence of specifi c requirements in IFRS, increases in interests in existing subsidiaries on acquisitions from third parties were treated in the same manner as the acquisitions of subsidiaries based on the fair value of the net assets at the date of acquisition of additional interest, with goodwill or bargain purchase gain being recognised, when appropriate; for decreases in interests in existing subsidiaries that did not involve a loss of control, the difference between the consideration received and the adjustment to the non-controlling interests was recognised in profi t or loss. Under IAS 27 (Revised 2008), all such increases or decreases are dealt with in equity, based on the relative interests in the carrying values of the net assets of subsidiaries, with no impact on goodwill or profi t or loss. — When control of a subsidiary is lost as a result of a transaction, event or circumstance, IAS 27 (Revised 2008) requires the Group to derecognise all assets, liabilities and non-controlling interests at their carrying amounts and to recognise the fair value of the consideration received. Any retained interest in the former subsidiary is recognised at its fair value at the date control is lost. The resulting difference is recognised in profi t or loss. — IAS 27 (Revised 2008) requires that the non-controlling interests’ proportionate share of profi t or loss is attributed to the non- controlling interests even if this results in the non-controlling interests having a debit balance. In prior years, the excess of the losses applicable to the non-controlling interests in a subsidiary over the non-controlling interest in the subsidiary’s equity were allocated against the Parent’s interest except to the extent that the non-controlling interests had a binding obligation and were able to make an additional investment to cover the losses. The adoption of IFRS 3 “Business Combinations” (Revised 2008) and IAS 27 “Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements” (Revised 2008) did not materially affect the amounts reported in the current year but may affect the accounting for future transactions as a result of changes in the Group’s accounting policies. In the current year, the Group also adopted amendments to a number of Standards resulting from annual improvements to IFRS that are effective for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2010. Adoption of these amendments, as well as adoption of other Standards and Interpretations did not have any signifi cant impact on the amounts reported in these consolidated fi nancial statements but may affect the accounting for future transactions and arrangements. Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 49 49 Overview Overview Business review Business review Management & Governance Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Financial Statements & Notes Other information Other information Standards and Interpretations in issue but not effective – At the date of authorisation of these consolidated fi nancial statements, the following Standards and Interpretations, as well as amendments to the Standards were in issue but not yet effective: Standard / Interpretation IAS 24 “Related Party Disclosures” (2009) Amendments to IFRS 1 “First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards” – Limited Exemption from Comparative IFRS 7 Disclosures for First-time Adopters Amendments to IAS 32 “Financial Instruments: Presentation” – Classifi cation of Rights Issues IFRIC 19 “Extinguishing Financial Liabilities with Equity Instruments” IFRS 9 “Financial Instruments: Classifi cation and Measurement” Amendments to IFRS 7 “Financial Instruments: Disclosures” – Transfers of Financial Assets Improvements to IFRS issued in 2010 Amendments to IAS 12 “Income Taxes” – Deferred Tax: Recovery of Underlying Assets Amendments to IFRS 1 “First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards” – Severe Hyperinfl ation and Removal of Fixed Dates for First-time Adopters * Standards and Interpretations not yet endorsed by the European Union. Effective for annual accounting period beginning on or after: 1 January 2011 1 July 2010 1 February 2010 1 July 2010 1 January 2013* 1 July 2011* 1 July 2010 and 1 January 2011 (as appropriate)* 1 January 2012* 1 July 2011* Management is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of IFRS 9 “Financial Instruments: Classifi cation and Measurement”. For other Standards and Interpretations management anticipates that their adoption in future periods will have no material effect on the consolidated fi nancial statements of the Group. Functional and presentation currency – The functional currency of the entities within the Group is the Ukrainian Hryvnia (“UAH”). Transactions in currencies other than the functional currency of the entities concerned are treated as transactions in foreign currencies. Such transactions are initially recorded at the rates of exchange ruling on the dates of the transactions. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in such currencies are translated at the rates prevailing on the balance sheet date. All realised and unrealised gains and losses arising on exchange differences are included in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income for the period. These consolidated fi nancial statements are presented in US Dollars (“US$”), which is the Group’s presentation currency. The results and fi nancial position of the Group are translated into the presentation currency using the following procedures: — Assets and liabilities for each consolidated balance sheet presented are translated at the closing rate as of the date of that balance sheet; — Income and expenses for each consolidated statement of comprehensive income are translated at exchange rates at the dates of the transactions; — All resulting exchange differences are recognised as a separate component of equity. For practical reasons, the Group translates items of income and expenses for each period presented in the fi nancial statements using the quarterly average rates of exchange, if such translations reasonably approximate to the results of transactions translated at historical currency rates. The relevant exchange rates were: UAH/US$ UAH/EUR As of 31 December 2010 Average for 2010 As of 31 December 2009 As of 31 December 2008 Average for 2009 7.9617 10.5731 7.9353 10.5313 7.9850 11.4489 7.7916 10.8736 7.7000 10.8555 Average for 2008 5.2693 7.7114 Basis of consolidation − The consolidated fi nancial statements incorporate the fi nancial statements of the Parent and entities controlled by the Parent (its subsidiaries). Control is achieved when the Parent has the power to govern the fi nancial and operating policies of an entity, either directly or indirectly, so as to obtain benefi ts from its activities. The fi nancial statements of subsidiaries are included in the consolidated fi nancial statements of the Group from the date when control effectively commences. All signifi cant intercompany transactions, balances and unrealised gains/(losses) on transactions are eliminated on consolidation, except when the intragroup losses indicate an impairment that requires recognition in the consolidated fi nancial statements. Where necessary, adjustments are made to the fi nancial statements of subsidiaries to bring the accounting policies used in line with those adopted by the Group. Accounting for acquisitions − The acquisitions of subsidiaries from third parties are accounted for using the acquisition method. On acquisition, the assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities of a subsidiary are measured at their fair values. The consideration transferred by the Group is measured at fair value, which is the sum of the acquisition-date fair values of the assets transferred by the Group, liabilities incurred by the Group to the former owners of the acquired subsidiary and the equity interests issued by the Group in exchange for control of the subsidiary. Acquisition-related costs are generally recognised in profi t or loss as incurred. 50 50 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements continued For the year ended 31 December 2010 (in US Dollars and in thousands) 3. Summary of signifi cant accounting policies continued When the consideration transferred by the Group in a business combination includes assets and liabilities resulting from a contingent consideration arrangement, the contingent consideration is measured at its acquisition-date fair value and is included as part of the consideration transferred. Changes in the fair value of the contingent consideration that qualify as measurement period adjustments are adjusted retrospectively, with corresponding adjustments against goodwill. Measurement period adjustments are adjustments that arise from additional information obtained during the measurement period (which may not exceed one year from the acquisition date) about facts and circumstances that existed at the acquisition date. Non-controlling interests that are present ownership interests and entitle their holders to a proportionate share of the subsidiary’s net assets in the event of liquidation may be initially measured either at fair value or at the non-controlling interests’ proportionate share of the recognised amounts of the subsidiary’s identifi able net assets. The choice of measurement basis is made on transaction-by-transaction basis. Other types of non-controlling interests, if any, are measured at fair value or, when applicable, on the basis specifi ed in other Standards. Goodwill is measured as the excess of the sum of the consideration transferred, the amount of any non-controlling interests in the acquired subsidiary, and the fair value of the Group’s previously held equity interest in the acquired subsidiary (if any) over the net of the acquisition-date amounts of the identifi able assets acquired and the liabilities assumed. If, after reassessment, the net of the acquisition- date amounts of the identifi able assets acquired and the liabilities assumed exceeds the sum of the consideration transferred, the amount of non-controlling interest in the subsidiary and the fair value of the Group’s previously-held interest in the subsidiary (if any), the excess is recognised in the consolidated profi t or loss. Changes in the Group’s ownership interests in subsidiaries that do not result in the Group losing control over the subsidiaries are accounted for as equity transactions. The carrying amounts of the Group’s interests and the non-controlling interests are adjusted to refl ect the changes in their relative interests in subsidiaries. Any difference between the amount by which the non-controlling interests are adjusted and the fair value of the consideration paid or received is recognised directly in equity and attributed to owners of the Parent. When an acquisition of a legal entity does not constitute a business, the cost of the group of assets is allocated between the individual identifi able assets in the group based on their relative fair values. Accounting for transactions with entities under common control − The assets and liabilities of subsidiaries acquired from entities under common control are recorded in these consolidated fi nancial statements at pre-acquisition carrying values. Any difference between the carrying value of net assets of these subsidiaries, and the consideration paid by the Group is accounted for in these consolidated fi nancial statements as an adjustment to shareholders’ equity. The results of the acquired entity are refl ected from the date of acquisition. Any gain or loss on disposals to entities under common control are recognised directly in equity and attributed to owners of the Parent. Discontinued operations − Non-current assets and disposal groups are classifi ed as held for sale if their carrying amounts will be recovered through a sale transaction rather than through continuing use. This condition is regarded as met only when the sale is highly probable and the asset or disposal group is available for immediate sale in its present condition. Management must be committed to the sale, which should be expected to qualify for recognition as a completed sale within one year from the date of classifi cation. Non-current assets and disposal groups classifi ed as held for sale are measured at the lower of the assets’ carrying amount and fair value less costs to sell. If the criteria of classifi cation of the disposal group held for sale are met after the balance sheet date, disposal group is not presented as held for sale in those fi nancial statements when issued. However, when those criteria are met after the balance sheet date but before the authorisation of the fi nancial statements for issue, the Group discloses the respective information in notes to the fi nancial statements. Non-current assets or disposal groups to be abandoned are not classifi ed as held for sale as the carrying amount will be recovered principally through continuing use. Non-current assets or disposal groups to be abandoned include non-current assets or disposal groups that are to be used to the end of their economic life or to be closed rather than sold. The assets or disposal groups to be abandoned are reported as discontinued operations in the period at which they are abandoned. Property, plant and equipment − Property, plant and equipment are carried at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and accumulated impairment losses, except for grain storage facilities, which are carried at revalued amounts, being their fair value at the date of the revaluation less any subsequent depreciation and impairment losses. The historical cost of an item of property, plant and equipment comprises (a) its purchase price, including import duties and non- refundable purchase taxes, after deducting trade discounts and rebates; (b) any costs directly attributable to bringing the item to the location and condition necessary for it to be capable of operating in the manner intended by the management of the Group; (c) the initial estimate of the costs of dismantling and removing the item and restoring the site on which it is located, (d) the obligation for which the Group incurs either when the item is acquired or as a consequence of having used the item during a particular period for purposes other than to produce inventories during that period; and (e) for qualifying assets, borrowing costs capitalised in accordance with the Group’s accounting policy. Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 51 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information Subsequently capitalised costs include major expenditures for improvements and replacements that extend the useful lives of the assets or increase their revenue generating capacity. Repairs and maintenance expenditures that do not meet the foregoing criteria for capitalisation are charged to the consolidated statement of comprehensive income as incurred. For grain storage facilities revaluations are performed with suffi cient regularity such that the carrying amount does not differ materially from that which would be determined using fair values at the balance sheet date. If the asset’s carrying amount is increased as a result of a revaluation, the increase is credited directly to equity as a revaluation reserve. However, such increase is recognised in the profi t or loss to the extent that it reverses a revaluation decrease of the same asset previously recognised in the profi t or loss. If the asset’s carrying amount is decreased as a result of a revaluation, the decrease is recognised in the profi t or loss. However, such decrease is debited directly to the revaluation reserve to the extent of any credit balance existing in the revaluation reserve in respect of that asset. Depreciation on revalued assets is charged to the profi t or loss. On the subsequent sale or retirement of a revalued asset, the attributable revaluation surplus remaining in the revaluation reserve is transferred directly to retained earnings. No transfer is made from the revaluation reserve to retained earnings except when an asset is derecognised. Depreciation of property, plant and equipment is charged so as to write off the depreciable amount over the useful life of an asset and is calculated using a straight-line method. Useful lives of the groups of property, plant and equipment are as follows: Buildings and structures Grain storage facilities Machinery and equipment Utilities and infrastructure Vehicles and agricultural machinery Offi ce furniture and equipment 15-35 years 20-35 years 10-15 years 10 years 5-15 years 3-5 years Depreciable amount is the cost of an item of property, plant and equipment, or revalued amount, less its residual value. The residual value is the estimated amount that the Group would currently obtain from disposal of the item of property, plant and equipment, after deducting the estimated costs of disposal, if the asset was already of the age and in the condition expected at the end of its useful life. The depreciable amount of assets held under fi nance leases are depreciated over their expected useful lives on the same basis as owned assets or, where shorter, the term of the relevant lease. The residual value, the useful lives and depreciation method are reviewed at each fi nancial year-end. The effect of any changes from previous estimates is accounted for prospectively as a change in an accounting estimate. The gain or loss arising on a sale or disposal of an item of property, plant and equipment is determined as the difference between the sales proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset and is recognised in profi t or loss. Construction in progress comprises costs directly related to the construction of property, plant and equipment including an appropriate allocation of directly attributable variable overheads that are incurred in construction. Construction in progress is not depreciated. Depreciation of construction in progress commences when the assets are available for use, i.e. when they are in the location and condition necessary for them to be capable of operating in the manner intended by the management. Intangible assets – Intangible assets, which are acquired by the Group and which have fi nite useful lives, consist primarily of land lease rights. Land lease rights acquired separately are carried at cost less accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses. Land lease rights acquired in a business combination and recognised separately from goodwill are initially recognised at their fair value at the acquisition date (which is regarded as their cost). Subsequent to initial recognition, land lease rights acquired in a business combination are reported at cost less accumulated amortisation and accumulated impairment losses, on the same basis as land lease rights acquired separately. Amortisation of intangible assets is recognised on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. For land lease rights, the amortisation period is determined by reference to the term of the non-cancellable operating lease agreement, which vary from 3 to 15 years. The amortisation period and the amortisation method for intangible assets with fi nite useful life are reviewed at least at the end of each reporting period. Impairment of tangible and intangible assets – At each balance sheet date, the Group reviews the carrying amounts of its tangible and intangible assets to determine whether there is any indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss (if any). For the purposes of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are separately identifi able cash fl ows (cash-generating units). 52 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements continued For the year ended 31 December 2010 (in US Dollars and in thousands) 3. Summary of signifi cant accounting policies continued Recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash fl ows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that refl ects current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks specifi c to the asset. If the recoverable amount of an asset (or cash-generating unit) is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying amount of the asset (cash-generating unit) is reduced to its recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognised immediately in the profi t or loss unless the relevant asset is carried at a revalued amount, in which case the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation decrease. Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying amount of the asset (cash-generating unit) is increased to the revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but so that the increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognised for the asset (cash-generating unit) in prior years. A reversal of an impairment loss is recognised immediately in the profi t or loss, unless the relevant asset is carried at a revalued amount, in which case the reversal of the impairment loss is treated as a revaluation increase. Impairment of goodwill – For the purposes of impairment testing, goodwill is allocated to each of the Group’s cash generating units (or groups of cash-generating units) that is expected to benefi t from the synergies of the combination. A cash-generating unit to which goodwill has been allocated is tested for impairment annually, or more frequently when there is indication that the unit may be impaired. If the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit is less than its carrying amount, the impairment loss is allocated fi rst to reduce the carrying amount of any goodwill allocated to the unit and then to the other assets of the unit pro rata based on the carrying amount of each asset in the unit. Any impairment loss for goodwill is recognised directly in profi t or loss in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income. An impairment loss recognised for goodwill is not reversed in subsequent periods. Income taxes − Income taxes have been computed in accordance with the laws currently enacted in jurisdictions where operating entities are located. Income tax is calculated based on the results for the year as adjusted for items that are non-assessable or non-tax deductible. It is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted by the balance sheet date. Deferred tax is accounted for using the balance sheet liability method in respect of temporary differences arising from differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities in the consolidated fi nancial statements and the corresponding tax basis used in the computation of taxable profi t. Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognised for all taxable temporary differences and deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent that it is probable that taxable profi ts will be available against which deductible temporary differences can be utilised. Deferred tax is charged or credited to the profi t or loss, except when it relates to items credited or charged directly to equity or other comprehensive income, in which case the deferred tax is also dealt with in equity or other comprehensive income. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when: — The Group has a legally enforceable right to set off the recognised amounts of current tax assets and current tax liabilities; — The Group has an intention to settle on a net basis, or to realise the asset and settle the liability simultaneously; — The deferred tax assets and the deferred tax liabilities relate to income taxes levied by the same taxation authority in each future period in which signifi cant amounts of deferred tax liabilities and assets are expected to be settled or recovered. The majority of the Group companies that are involved in agricultural production (poultry farms and other entities engaged in agricultural production) benefi t substantially from the status of an agricultural producer. These companies are exempt from income taxes and pay the Fixed Agricultural Tax instead (Note 10). Inventories − Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost comprises raw materials and, where applicable, direct labour costs and those overheads that have been incurred in bringing the inventories to their present locations and condition. Cost is calculated using the FIFO (fi rst-in, fi rst-out) method. Net realisable value is determined as the estimated selling price less all estimated costs of completion and costs to be incurred in marketing, selling and distribution. Agriculture related production process results in production of joint products: main and by-products. A by-product arising from the process is measured at net realisable value and this value is deducted from the cost of the main product. Biological assets and agricultural produce − Agricultural activity is defi ned as a biological transformation of biological assets for sale into agricultural produce or into additional biological assets. The Group classifi es hatchery eggs, live poultry and other animals and plantations as biological assets. The Group recognises a biological asset or agricultural produce when the Group controls the asset as a result of past events, it is probable that future economic benefi ts associated with the asset will fl ow to the Group, and the fair value or cost of the asset can be measured reliably. Biological assets are stated at fair value less estimated costs to sell at both initial recognition and as of the balance sheet date, with any resulting gain or loss recognised in the consolidated profi t or loss. Costs to sell include all costs that would be necessary to sell the assets, including costs necessary to get the assets to market. Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 53 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information The difference between fair value less costs to sell and total production costs is allocated to biological assets held in stock as of each balance sheet date as a fair value adjustment. The change in this adjustment from one period to another is recognised in Net change in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce in the profi t or loss. Agricultural produce harvested from biological assets is measured at its fair value less costs to sell at the point of harvest. A gain or loss arising on initial recognition of agricultural produce at fair value less costs to sell is included in the profi t or loss. Based on the above policy, the principal groups of biological assets and agricultural produce are stated as follows: Biological Assets (i) Broilers Broilers comprise poultry held for chicken meat production. Fair value of broilers is determined by reference to the cash fl ows that will be obtained from sales of 44-day aged chickens, with an allowance for costs to be incurred and risks to be faced during the remaining transformation process. (ii) Breeders The fair value of breeders is determined using the discounted cash fl ow approach based on hatchery eggs market prices. (iii) Cattle and pigs Cattle and pigs comprise cattle held for regeneration of livestock population and animals raised for milk and beef and pork meat production. The fair value of livestock is determined based on market prices of livestock of similar age, breed and genetic merit. Cattle, for which market-determined prices or values are not available and for which alternative estimates of fair value are determined to be clearly unreliable, are measured using the present value of expected net cash fl ows from the asset discounted at a current market-determined pre-tax rate. (iv) Orchards Orchards consist of plants used for fruits production. Fruit trees achieve the normal productive age in the second to fi fth year. The fair value of orchards which have attained normal productive age is determined using the discounted cash fl ow approach. (v) Crops in fi elds The fair value of crops in fi elds is determined by reference to the cash fl ows that will be obtained from sales of harvested crops, with an allowance for costs to be incurred and risks to be faced during the remaining transformation process. Agricultural Produce (i) Dressed poultry, beef and pork The fair value of dressed poultry, beef and pork is determined by reference to market prices at the point of harvest. (ii) Fodder grain and fruits The fair value of fodder grain and fruits is determined by reference to market prices at the point of harvest. The Group’s biological assets are classifi ed into bearer and consumable biological assets depending upon the function of a particular group of biological assets in the Group’s production process. Consumable biological assets are those that are to be harvested as agricultural produce, and include hatchery eggs and live broiler poultry intended for the production of meat, as well as pork and meat cows. Bearer biological assets include poultry held for hatchery eggs production, orchards, milk cows and breeding bulls. Financial instruments − Financial assets and fi nancial liabilities are recognised on the Group’s consolidated balance sheet when the Group becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument. Regular way purchases and sales of fi nancial assets and liabilities are recognised using settlement date accounting. The settlement date is the date that an asset is delivered to or by an entity. Settlement date accounting refers to (a) the recognition of an asset on the day it is received by the entity, and (b) the derecognition of an asset and recognition of any gain or loss on disposal on the day that it is delivered by the entity. The accounting policies for initial recognition and subsequent measurement of fi nancial instruments are disclosed in the respective accounting policies set out below in this Note. Accounts receivable − Accounts receivable are measured at initial recognition at fair value, and are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method. Short-term accounts receivable, which are non-interest bearing, are stated at their nominal value. Appropriate allowances for estimated irrecoverable amounts are recognised in the profi t or loss when there is objective evidence that the asset is impaired. The allowance recognised is measured as the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash fl ows discounted at the effective interest rate computed at initial recognition. Cash and cash equivalents − Cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, cash with banks, deposits and marketable securities with original maturity of less than three months. 54 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements continued For the year ended 31 December 2010 (in US Dollars and in thousands) 3. Summary of signifi cant accounting policies continued Bank borrowings, corporate bonds issued and other long-term payables − Interest-bearing borrowings, bonds and other long-term payables are initially measured at fair value net of directly attributable transaction costs, and are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method. Any difference between the proceeds (net of transaction costs) and the settlement or redemption amount is recognised over the term of the borrowings and recorded as fi nance costs. Derivative fi nancial instruments − Derivative fi nancial instruments are initially measured at fair value on the contract date, and are re-measured to fair value at subsequent reporting dates. The Group does not enter into fi nancial instruments that would be accounted for as derivatives. Changes in the fair value of derivative fi nancial instruments are recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income as they arise. Trade and other accounts payable − Accounts payable are measured at initial recognition at fair value, and are subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method. Leases − Leases are classifi ed as fi nance leases whenever the terms of the lease transfer substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership to the Group. All other leases are classifi ed as operating leases. Assets received by the Group under fi nance leases are recognised as assets of the Group at their fair value at the date of acquisition or, if lower, at the present value of the minimum lease payments. The corresponding liability to the lessor is included in the consolidated balance sheet as a fi nance lease obligation. Lease payments are apportioned between fi nance charges and a reduction of the lease obligation so as to achieve a constant rate of interest on the remaining balance of the liability. Finance charges are charged directly to the profi t or loss and classifi ed as fi nance costs. Rental income or expenses under operating leases are recognised in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. Provisions − Provisions are recognised when the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation (either based on legal regulations or implied) as a result of past events, and it is probable that an outfl ow of resources will be required to settle the obligation and a reliable estimate of the obligation can be made. Revenue recognition − The Group generates revenue primarily from the sale of agricultural products to end customers. Revenue is recognised when the signifi cant risks and rewards of ownership of the goods have passed to the buyer, the amount of revenue can be measured reliably and it is probable that collection will occur. The point of transfer of risk, which may occur at delivery or shipment, varies for contracts with different types of customers. When goods are exchanged or swapped for goods which are of a similar nature and value, the exchange is not regarded as a transaction which generates revenue. When goods are sold in exchange for dissimilar goods, the exchange is regarded as a transaction which generates revenue, and revenue is measured at the fair value of the goods received, adjusted by the amount of any cash or cash equivalents transferred. Segment information − Segment reporting is presented on the basis of management’s perspective and relates to the parts of the Group that are defi ned as operating segments. Operating segments are identifi ed on the basis of internal reports provided to the Group’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”). The Group has identifi ed its top management team as its CODM and the internal reports used by the top management team to oversee operations and make decisions on allocating resources serve as the basis of information presented. These internal reports are prepared on the same basis as these consolidated fi nancial statements. Based on the current management structure, the Group has identifi ed the following reportable segments: — Poultry and related operations — Grain growing — Other agricultural operations Borrowing costs – Borrowing costs include interest expense, fi nance charges on fi nance leases and other interest-bearing long-term payables and debt service costs. Borrowing costs directly attributable to the acquisition, construction or production of qualifying assets, which are assets that necessarily take a substantial period of time to get ready for their intended use or sale, are added to the cost of those assets, until such time as the assets are substantially ready for their intended use or sale. Investment income earned on the temporary investment of specifi c borrowings pending their expenditure on qualifying assets is deducted from the borrowing costs eligible for capitalisation. All other borrowing costs are recognised in the profi t or loss in the period in which they are incurred. Government grants − Government grants received or receivable for processing of live animals and value added tax (“VAT”), and grants for the agricultural industry (conditional upon reinvestment of the granted funds for agricultural production purposes) are recognised as income over the periods necessary to match them with the related costs, or as an offset against fi nance costs when received as Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 55 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information compensation for the fi nance costs for agricultural producers. To the extent the conditions attached to the grants are not met at the balance sheet date, the received funds are recorded in the Group’s consolidated fi nancial statements as deferred income. Other government grants are recognised at the moment when the decision to disburse the amounts to the Group is made. Contingent liabilities and assets − Contingent liabilities are not recognised in the consolidated fi nancial statements. They are disclosed in the notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements unless the possibility of an outfl ow of resources embodying economic benefi ts is remote. Contingent assets are recognised only when the contingency is resolved. Reclassifi cations – Certain reclassifi cations have been made to the consolidated balance sheets as of 31 December 2009 and 2008 and to the consolidated statements of other comprehensive income for the years then ended to conform to the current year presentation. The reclassifi cations were made due to changes in relative signifi cance of the following items: — Land lease rights, net — Prepayments for property, plant and equipment — Accounts payable for property, plant and equipment — Deferred income — Other operating income and expenses — Other income and expenses 4. Critical accounting judgments and key sources of estimation uncertainty In the application of the Group’s accounting policies, which are described in Note 3, management is required to make judgements, estimates and assumptions about the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. The estimates and associated assumptions are based on historical experience and other factors that are considered to be relevant. Actual results may differ from these estimates. The estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Revisions to accounting estimates are recognised in the period in which the estimate is revised if the revision affects both current and future periods. Critical judgements in applying accounting policies The following are the critical judgments, apart from those involving estimations (see below), that management has made in the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies and that have the most signifi cant effect on the amounts recognised in fi nancial statements. Acquisitions of land lease rights – During the year ended 31 December 2010, the Group acquired control over entities owning legal rights for operating leases of agricultural land plots. For each individual acquisition, the Group evaluated whether the acquisition constituted an asset acquisition or a business combination. In making this judgment, management considered whether the acquired entities are capable of being conducted and managed as a business for the purpose of providing returns, including whether the acquired entities possess other assets and workforce as inputs compared to normal industry requirements. As a result, the Group’s management concluded that land lease rights of US$4,767 thousand and US$18,801 thousand were acquired in assets acquisition and business combination transactions, respectively (Note 9). Revenue recognition – In the normal course of business, the Group engages in sale and purchase transactions with the purpose to exchange crops in various locations to fulfi ll the Group’s production requirements. In accordance with the Group’s accounting policy, revenue is not recognised with respect to the exchange transactions involving goods of similar nature and value. Group management applies judgment to determine whether each particular transaction represents an exchange or a transaction that generates revenue. In making this judgment, management considers whether the underlying crops are of similar type and quality, as well as whether the time passed between the transfer and receipt of the underlying crops indicates that the substance of the transaction is an exchange of similar goods. Recognition of inventories – During the year ended 31 December 2009, the Group acquired components for mixed fodder production from a local supplier under grain purchase fi nancing arrangements. According to the contractual terms, legal ownership to the goods passed to the Group on physical delivery to the Group’s grain storage facilities, which is generally the date when inventories are recognised in the Group’s fi nancial statements. However, based on the analysis of the nature of this arrangement, management applied judgment to determine the date on which control over these goods passed to the Group. In making this judgment, management considered the relevant signifi cance of risk and rewards associated with ownership of grains, in particular date of transfer of physical damage risk, as well as commercial risks and benefi ts associated with ownership. Based on this assessment, management concluded that the Group assumed risk of physical damage and obtained commercial benefi ts prior to obtaining legal ownership over these inventories and as such, that these inventories should be recognised in the Group’s fi nancial statements from the date when they were acquired by the supplier. Revaluation of property, plant and equipment – As described in Note 8, the Group applies revaluation model to the measurement of grain storage facilities. At each reporting date, the Group carries out a review of the carrying amount of these assets to determine whether the carrying amount differs materially from fair value. The Group carries out such review by preparing a discounted cash fl ow analysis involving assumptions on projected revenues and costs, and a discount rate. Additionally, the Group considers economic stability and availability of transactions with similar assets in the market when determining whether to perform a fair value assessment in a given period. Based on the results of this review, the Group concluded that grain storage facilities need not be revalued as of 31 December 2010. 56 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements continued For the year ended 31 December 2010 (in US Dollars and in thousands) 4. Critical accounting judgments and key sources of estimation uncertainty continued Key sources of estimation uncertainty The following are the key assumptions concerning the future, and other key sources of estimation uncertainty at the end of the reporting period that have a signifi cant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next fi nancial year. Fair value less costs to sell of biological assets and agricultural produce – Biological assets are recorded at fair values less costs to sell. The Group estimates the fair values of biological assets based on the following key assumptions: — Average meat output for broilers and livestock for meat production — Average productive life of breeders and cattle held for regeneration and milk production — Expected crops output — Projected orchards output — Estimated changes in future sales prices — Projected production costs and costs to sell — Discount rate. Although some of these assumptions are obtained from published market data, a majority of these assumptions are estimated based on the Group’s historical and projected results. Useful lives of property, plant and equipment – The estimation of the useful life of an item of property, plant and equipment is a matter of management estimate based upon experience with similar assets. In determining the useful life of an asset, management considers the expected usage, estimated technical obsolescence, physical wear and tear and the physical environment in which the asset is operated. Changes in any of these conditions or estimates may result in adjustments for future depreciation rates. Impairment of property, plant and equipment – As described in Note 8, during the periods presented, the Group identifi ed indicators of impairment associated with the assets used in the production of goose meat and foie gras, assets used in production of convenience foods under the “Legko!” brand, and administrative offi ce premises, and assessed the assets’ recoverable amount. In determining the recoverable amount of these assets, Group management referred to the assets’ value in use due to lack of reliable basis of estimates of the amounts obtainable from the sale of the asset in an arm’s length transaction between knowledgeable and willing parties. The value in use calculation requires management to estimate future cash infl ows expected to arise from each group of assets and a suitable discount rate in order to calculate present value. In estimating the appropriate discount rates, the Group used the weighted average cost of capital, as adjusted for currency denomination of expected future cash fl ows and different levels of business risks assessed for each group of assets. Details of the impairment loss calculation are set out in Note 8. VAT recoverable – Note 11 describes long-term VAT recoverable accumulated by the Group on its capital expenditures and investments in working capital. The balance of VAT recoverable may be realised by the Group either through a cash refund from the state budget or by set off against VAT liabilities with the state budget in future periods. Management classifi ed VAT recoverable balance as current or non-current based on expectations as to whether it will be realised within twelve months from the reporting date. In addition, management assessed whether the allowance for irrecoverable VAT needs to be created. In making this assessment, management considered past history of receiving VAT refunds from the state budget. For VAT recoverable expected to be set off against VAT liabilities in future periods, management based its estimates on detailed projections of expected excess of VAT output over VAT input in the normal course of the business. 5. Segment information All of the Group’s operations are located within Ukraine. Segment information is analysed on the basis of the types of goods supplied by the Group’s operating divisions. The Group’s reportable segments under IFRS 8 are therefore as follows: Poultry and related operations segment - sales of chicken meat - sales of sunfl ower oil - other poultry related sales Other agricultural operations segment - sales of meat processing products and other meat - other agricultural sales Grain growing segment - sales of grains The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as the Group’s accounting policies described in Note 3. Sales between segments are carried out at market prices. Segment result represents operating profi t before loss on impairment of property, plant and equipment and unallocated corporate expenses. Unallocated corporate expenses include management remuneration, representative expenses, and expenses on maintenance of offi ce premises. This is the measure reported to the chief operating decision maker for the purposes of resource allocation and assessment of segment performance. Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 57 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information For the purposes of monitoring segment performance and allocating resources between segments: — All assets are allocated to reportable segments other than cash and cash equivalents and short-term deposits, administrative offi ce premises, and income tax assets. — All liabilities are allocated to reportable segments other than bonds issued, bank borrowings, fi nance leases, and income tax liabilities. During the year ended 31 December 2008 the Group disposed of its shareholding in Kyivska, which was reported in Other agricultural operations segment. The segment information reported below does not include any amounts of these discontinued operations, which are described in more detail in Note 6. The following table presents revenue, results of operations and certain assets and liabilities information regarding segments for the year ended 31 December 2010. Unallocated corporate assets comprise of assets that are not directly attributable to particular segment. Unallocated corporate liabilities comprise of interest-bearing liabilities and liabilities that are not directly attributable to a particular segment. External sales Sales between business segments Total revenue Segment results Unallocated corporate expenses Other expenses, net Profi t before tax Other information: Segment assets Unallocated corporate assets Consolidated total assets Segment liabilities Unallocated corporate liabilities Consolidated total liabilities Poultry and related operations Other agricultural operations 800,237 28,584 108,338 3,353 Grain growing 35,631 85,668 Eliminations Consolidated (117,605) 944,206 – 828,821 111,691 121,299 (117,605) 944,206 225,073 3,738 55,765 – 284,576 946,195 – 154,392 – 236,590 – (35,436) – (7,177) – (7,970) – (27,792) (39,463) 217,321 – 1,337,177 236,832 – 1,574,009 – – – – – (50,583) (853,058) (903,641) 156,157 64,582 29,014 Additions to property, plant and equipment* Depreciation and amortisation** Net change in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce 128,972 47,600 9,473 9,825 5,585 2,522 17,360 11,397 17,019 * Additions to property, plant and equipment in 2010 (Note 8) include unallocated additions to property, plant and equipment in the amount of US$4,818 thousand. ** Depreciation and amortisation for the year ended 31 December 2010 includes unallocated depreciation and amortisation in the amount of US$3,320 thousand. 58 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements continued For the year ended 31 December 2010 (in US Dollars and in thousands) 5. Segment information continued The following table presents revenue, results of operations and certain assets and liabilities information regarding business segments for the years ended 31 December 2009 and 2008: Poultry and related operations Other agricultural operations 2009 Grain growing Eliminations Consolidated Poultry and related operations Other agricultural operations 2008 Grain growing Eliminations Consolidated 577,143 88,109 45,752 – 711,004 660,031 93,102 49,777 – 802,910 External sales Sales between business segments 22,438 1,496 37,673 (61,607) – 20,362 1,268 17,653 (39,283) – Total revenue Segment results 599,581 196,594 89,605 3,234 83,425 35,301 (61,607) – 711,004 235,129 680,393 255,165 94,370 184 67,430 10,739 (39,283) – 802,910 266,088 Unallocated corporate expenses Loss on impairment of property, plant and equipment Other expenses, net Profi t before tax Other information: Segment assets Unallocated corporate assets Consolidated total assets Segment liabilities Unallocated corporate liabilities Consolidated total liabilities Additions to property, plant and equipment Depreciation Net change in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce (15,845) (1,304) (64,465) 153,515 770,376 134,310 135,909 1,040,595 562,485 122,430 120,287 97,310 1,137,905 (96,609) (8,089) (4,076) (108,774) (32,565) (9,696) (5,202) (534,723) (643,497) 117,685 37,193 10,338 5,473 5,559 9,011 133,582 51,677 165,077 41,230 24,262 7,383 49,711 8,325 (10,815) (11,767) (227,312) 16,194 805,202 119,359 924,561 (47,463) (530,881) (578,344) 239,050 56,938 16,670 704 17,862 35,236 17,854 (1,137) (10,390) 6,327 * Additions to property, plant and equipment in 2009 and 2008 (Note 8) included unallocated additions to property, plant and equipment in the amount of US$24,545 and 9,227 thousand. The Group’s export sales to external customers by major product types were as follows during the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008: Sunfl ower oil and related products Chicken meat Grains Other agricultural segment products Total export revenue 2010 2009 2008 188,156 29,147 22,454 290 104,864 17,650 30,109 270 109,899 10,686 – 174 240,047 152,893 120,759 Export sales of sunfl ower oil and related products and export sales of grains are primarily made to global trading companies at CPT port terms. The major market for the Group’s export sales of chicken meat are CIS countries. 6. Discontinued operations During the year ended 31 December 2008, the Group disposed of its shareholding in Kyivska (Note 2). The comparative information for the consolidated statement of comprehensive income has been represented to show the discontinued operations separately from continuing operations. Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 The results of Kyivska for the year ended 31 December 2008 were as follows: Revenue Net change in fair value of biological assets and agricultural produce Cost of sales Gross loss Other operating expenses Operating loss Other expenses, net Income tax expense (Note 10) Loss on disposal of operation Loss for the year from discontinued operations 59 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information 2008 3,922 (1,382) (5,796) (3,256) (114) (3,370) (159) – (3,529) (6,193) (9,722) During the year ended 31 December 2008 the results from discontinued operations were attributable to equity holders of the Parent. The assets and liabilities comprising the discontinued operations were as follows: Total assets Total liabilities The net cash fl ows incurred by the Group in relation to Kyivska for the year ended 31 December 2008 were as follows: Operating activities Investing activities Financing activities Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 2008 16,603 10,056 2008 (3,019) (867) 3,893 7 7. Related party balances and transactions For the purposes of these fi nancial statements, parties are considered to be related if one party controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the other party, or exercises signifi cant infl uence over the other party in making fi nancial or operational decisions. In considering each possible related party relationship, attention is directed to the substance of the relationship, not merely the legal form. Related parties may enter into transactions which unrelated parties might not, and transactions between related parties may not be effected on the same terms and conditions as transactions between unrelated parties. Transactions with related parties under common control The Group enters into transactions with related parties that are under common control of the Principal Shareholder of the Group (Note 1) in the ordinary course of business for the purchase and sale of goods and services and in relation to the provision of fi nancing arrangements. Terms and conditions of sales to related parties are determined based on arrangements specifi c to each contract of transaction. Management believes that the accounts receivable due from related parties do not require allowance for irrecoverable amounts and that the amounts payable to related parties will be settled at cost. The terms of the payables and receivables related to trading activities of the Group do not vary signifi cantly from the terms of similar transactions with third parties. The transactions with the related parties during the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008 were as follows: Sales of goods to related parties Sales of services to related parties Purchases from related parties 2010 7,476 51 194 2009 6,937 40 112 2008 10,203 52 1,892 During the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Group’s sales to related parties mainly consisted of sales of poultry production related products. 60 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements continued For the year ended 31 December 2010 (in US Dollars and in thousands) 7. Related party balances and transactions continued The balances owed to and due from related parties were as follows as of 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008: Trade accounts receivable (Note 18) Advances received (Note 26) Short-term advances, fi nance aid and promissory notes (Note 16) 2010 7,756 200 2,304 2009 3,176 200 1,061 2008 2,791 338 976 Compensation to key management personnel Total compensation of the Group’s key management personnel included primarily in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of comprehensive income amounted to US$15,514 thousand, US$8,652 thousand and US$12,009 thousand for the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Compensation to key management personnel consists of contractual salary and performance bonuses; during the year ended 31 December 2010 compensation to key management personnel included a one-off bonus to one of the top managers in the amount of US$7,628 thousand (Note 32). Key management personnel totaled 38 individuals as of 31 December 2010 and 2009 and 35 individuals as of 31 December 2008, respectively, including 3 independent directors. 8. Property, plant and equipment, net The following table represents movements in property, plant and equipment for the year ended 31 December 2010: Buildings and structures Grain storage facilities Machinery and equipment Utilities and infrastructure Vehicles and agricultural machinery Offi ce furniture and equipment Construction in progress Cost or valuation As of 1 January 2010 Additions Disposals Transfers Acquired through business combination (Note 2) Reclassifi cations Translation difference 217,356 25,500 (176) 6,670 6,365 3,652 432 30,929 1,563 – 12 – – 85 244,698 21,906 (425) 2,248 2,106 2,869 622 52,757 4,897 (38) 1,167 22 (6,521) 156 154,570 29,526 (1,563) 122 7,955 – 333 13,897 2,102 (51) 49 15 – 34 66,322 75,481 – (10,268) – – 16 Total 780,529 160,975 (2,253) – 16,463 – 1,678 As of 31 December 2010 259,799 32,589 274,024 52,440 190,943 16,046 131,551 957,392 Accumulated depreciation As of 1 January 2010 Depreciation charge for the year Eliminated on disposal Reclassifi cations Translation difference 23,447 13,216 (36) 540 22 – 1,049 – – (3) 59,634 23,409 (234) 265 97 9,593 4,397 (3) (805) 16 49,896 22,088 (992) – 76 As of 31 December 2010 37,189 1,046 83,171 13,198 71,068 3,690 3,110 (46) – 1 6,755 – – – – – – 146,260 67,269 (1,311) – 209 212,427 Net book value 31 December 2010 1 January 2010 222,610 31,543 190,853 39,242 119,875 9,291 131,551 744,965 193,909 30,929 185,064 43,164 104,674 10,207 66,322 634,269 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 61 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information The following table represents movements in property, plant and equipment for the year ended 31 December 2009: Cost or valuation As of 1 January 2009 Additions Disposals Transfers Increase from revaluation Impairment loss Translation difference Buildings and structures Grain storage facilities Machinery and equipment Utilities and infrastructure Vehicles and agricultural machinery Offi ce furniture and equipment Construction in progress 137,697 48,026 (117) 38,164 – (941) (5,473) 21,060 – – – 10,739 – (870) 174,310 57,579 (844) 21,859 – (153) (8,053) 26,043 3,118 (2) 25,189 – – (1,591) 125,081 35,888 (2,749) 1,870 – (210) (5,310) 4,438 9,600 (54) 300 – – (387) 153,417 3,916 (544) (87,382) – – (3,085) Total 642,046 158,127 (4,310) – 10,739 (1,304) (24,769) As of 31 December 2009 217,356 30,929 244,698 52,757 154,570 13,897 66,322 780,529 Accumulated depreciation As of 1 January 2009 Depreciation charge for the year Eliminated on disposal Eliminated on revaluation Translation difference As of 31 December 2009 Net book value 31 December 2009 1 January 2009 19,250 5,040 (40) – (803) 23,447 445 734 – (1,173) (6) 41,377 20,492 (285) – (1,950) 6,488 3,418 (2) – (311) 32,728 20,740 (1,966) – (1,606) – 59,634 9,593 49,896 1,925 1,925 (45) – (115) 3,690 – – – – – – 102,213 52,349 (2,338) (1,173) (4,791) 146,260 193,909 30,929 185,064 43,164 104,674 10,207 66,322 634,269 118,447 20,615 132,933 19,555 92,353 2,513 153,417 539,833 The following table represents movements in property, plant and equipment for the year ended 31 December 2008: Buildings and structures Grain storage facilities Machinery and equipment Utilities and infrastructure Vehicles and agricultural machinery Offi ce furniture and equipment Construction in progress Cost or valuation As of 1 January 2008 Additions Disposals Transfers Disposal of Kyivska (Note 2) Acquired through business combination (Note 2) Impairment loss Translation difference 184,169 13,643 (3,218) 7,353 (1,317) 6,143 (2,653) (66,423) 31,497 626 (2) 7 (38) – – (11,030) 244,200 18,643 (10,392) 4,879 (1,429) 8,587 – (90,178) 32,115 6,063 (471) 892 (81) 992 – (13,467) 135,930 54,164 (3,297) 3,326 (1,488) 408 – (63,962) 5,016 1,335 (92) 273 (31) 165 – (2,228) 100,258 153,803 – (16,730) (1,287) 12,442 (9,114) (85,955) Total 733,185 248,277 (17,472) – (5,671) 28,737 (11,767) (333,243) As of 31 December 2008 137,697 21,060 174,310 26,043 125,081 4,438 153,417 642,046 Accumulated depreciation As of 1 January 2008 Depreciation charge for the year Eliminated on disposal Disposal of Kyivska (Note 2) Translation difference As of 31 December 2008 Net book value 31 December 2008 1 January 2008 19,922 10,011 (375) (410) (9,898) 19,250 – 686 – (25) (216) 41,976 22,798 (1,603) (659) (21,135) 6,779 3,052 (32) (25) (3,286) 31,974 19,937 (1,559) (820) (16,804) 445 41,377 6,488 32,728 1,895 1,108 (78) (23) (977) 1,925 – – – – – – 102,546 57,592 (3,647) (1,962) (52,316) 102,213 118,447 20,615 132,933 19,555 92,353 2,513 153,417 539,833 164,247 31,497 202,224 25,336 103,956 3,121 100,258 630,639 As of 31 December 2010, included within construction in progress were prepayments for property, plant and equipment in the amount of US$25,020 thousand (2009: US$6,591 thousand; 2008: US$22,269 thousand). As of 31 December 2010, included within property, plant and equipment were fully depreciated assets with the cost of US$12,494 thousand (2009: US$5,243 thousand; 2008: US$5,276 thousand). As of 31 December 2010, the Group’s machinery and equipment with the carrying amount of US$5,247 thousand (2009: US$5,813 thousand, 2008: US$6,674 thousand) were pledged as collateral to secure its banks borrowings (Note 22). As of 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008 the net carrying amount of property, plant and equipment held under fi nance lease agreements were US$72,234 thousand, US$61,554 thousand and US$57,476 thousand, respectively. 62 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements continued For the year ended 31 December 2010 (in US Dollars and in thousands) 8. Property, plant and equipment, net continued Impairment assessment – The Group reviews its property, plant and equipment each period to determine if any indication of impairment exists. Based on these reviews, indicators of impairment were identifi ed in 2009 and 2008 associated with the assets used in the production of goose meat and foie gras, assets used in production of convenience foods under the “Legko!” brand, and administrative offi ce premises. As a result, the Group estimated the recoverable amount of these assets and determined that the carrying value exceeded the recoverable amount. Accordingly, during the years ended 31 December 2009 and 2008 the Group recognised impairment losses of US$1,304 thousand and US$11,767 thousand, respectively, for the difference in these amounts. No impairment losses were recognised in the year ended 31 December 2010. The impairment losses recognised were due to increased business risks and lower expected returns to the production lines, as well as decreased market prices for commercial properties relative previous years. The amount of impairment losses recognised during the periods, together with information on the discount rates used in the estimation of the recoverable amount of impaired assets, is as follows: Production line Convenience foods Goose meat and foie gras Administrative offi ce premises Total 2009 2008 Discount rate used, % Loss on impairment Discount rate used, % Loss on impairment 23.1 31.1 14.4 – 1,304 – 1,304 25.5 33.5 15.25 – 2,653 9,114 11,767 Assets used in convenience foods production and production of goose meat and foie gras belong to the poultry and related operations and other agricultural operations segments, respectively. Administrative offi ce premises are not allocated to reportable segments. The discount rates used in the assessment of the recoverable amounts of impaired assets vary depending on the currency denomination of future cash fl ows and different levels of business risks assessed for each group of assets. Revaluation of grain storage facilities – During the year ended 31 December 2009, the Group engaged independent appraisers to revalue its grain storage facilities. The effective date of revaluation was 1 December 2009. The valuation, which conformed to the International Valuation Standards, was determined by reference to observable prices in an active market and recent market transactions. No revaluation of grain storage facilities was performed as of 31 December 2010 as, based on the management’s assessment, the fair value of grain storage facilities as of 31 December 2010 did not materially differ from their carrying amount. If the grain storage facilities were carried at cost, their net book value as of 31 December 2010 would be US$13,792 thousand (2009: US$12,549 thousand, 2008: US$13,321 thousand). 9. Land lease rights, net Land lease rights represent rights for operating leases of agricultural land plots, the major part of which was acquired by the Group during the year ended 31 December 2010 as part of assets acquisitions and through business combinations. As of the dates of these acquisitions, the related operating lease agreements had validity terms of 3 to 15 years. The following table represents movements in land lease rights for the year ended 31 December 2010: Cost: As of 31 December 2009 Additions Acquired through business combinations (Note 2) Translation difference As of 31 December 2010 Accumulated amortisation: As of 31 December 2009 Amortization charge for the year Translation difference As of 31 December 2010 Net book value: As of 31 December 2010 As of 31 December 2009 965 4,767 18,801 (94) 24,439 111 1,117 (5) 1,223 23,216 854 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 63 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information 10. Taxation The majority of the Group companies that are involved in agricultural production pay the Fixed Agricultural Tax (the “FAT”) in accordance with the Law “On Fixed Agricultural Tax”. The FAT substitutes the following taxes for agricultural producers: Corporate Income Tax, Land Tax, Municipal Tax, Natural Resources Usage Duty, Geological Survey Duty, and Trade Patent. The FAT is calculated by local authorities and depends on the area and valuation of land occupied. This tax regime is valid indefi nitely. FAT does not constitute an income tax, and as such, is recognised in the statement of comprehensive income in Other operating expenses. During the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008, the Group companies which have the status of the Corporate Income Tax (the “CIT”) payers in Ukraine were subject to income tax at a 25% rate. The new Tax Code of Ukraine, which was enacted in December 2010 (Note 28), introduced gradual decreases in income tax rates over the future years (from 23% effective 1 April 2011 to 16% effective 1 January 2014), as well as certain changes to the rules of income tax assessment starting from 1 April 2011. The deferred income tax assets and liabilities as of 31 December 2010 were measured based on the tax rates expected to be applied to the period when the temporary differences are expected to reverse. The net results of the Group companies incorporated in jurisdictions other than Ukraine were insignifi cant during the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008. The components of income tax (benefi t)/expense were as follows for the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008: Current income tax expense Deferred tax benefi t Income tax expense/(benefi t) 2010 2009 2008 3,413 (1,540) 1,873 933 (7,421) (6,488) 1,739 (460) 1,279 Reconciliation between profi t before tax multiplied by the statutory tax rate and the tax expense for the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008 was as follows: Profi t before tax from continuing operations Loss before tax from discontinued operations (Note 6) Profi t before income tax Income tax expense at the tax rate of 25% Tax effect of: Income generated by FAT payers (exempt from income tax) Changes in tax rate and law Unrecognised deferred tax assets on property, plant and equipment Non-deductible expenses Expenses not deducted for tax purposes Income tax expense/(benefi t) 2010 2009 2008 217,321 – 153,515 – 217,321 153,515 54,330 38,379 (76,815) (18,801) 6,792 11,889 24,478 (58,770) – – 10,419 3,484 16,194 (9,722) 6,472 1,618 (44,987) – – 12,286 32,362 1,873 (6,488) 1,279 As of 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008 the Group did not recognise deferred tax assets arising from temporary differences of US$97,912 thousand, US$13,936 thousand and US$129,448 thousand, respectively, as the Group does not intend to deduct respective expenses for tax purposes in future periods. As of 31 December 2010 the Group did not recognise deferred tax assets on temporary differences in respect of the property, plant and equipment of US$27,168 thousand due to uncertainties as to whether the Group will be able to realise these deferred tax assets. Deferred tax liabilities have not been recognised in respect of unremitted earnings of Ukrainian subsidiaries as the earnings can be remitted free from taxation currently and in future years. As of 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008, deferred tax assets and liabilities comprised the following: Deferred tax assets arising from: Advances received and other payables Other current liabilities Inventories Property, plant and equipment Expenses deferred in tax books Less: Unrecognised deferred tax assets Total deferred tax assets Deferred tax liabilities arising from: Property, plant and equipment Prepayments to suppliers Inventories Total deferred tax liabilities Net deferred tax asset/(liability) 2010 2009 2008 4,284 1,619 – 6,792 1,942 5,736 5,168 897 – 6,795 2,099 1,030 473 – 4,994 (6,792) – – 7,845 18,596 8,596 (2,655) (1,827) (675) (13,999) (3,384) – (12,312) (241) (156) (5,157) (17,383) (12,709) 2,688 1,213 (4,113) 64 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements continued For the year ended 31 December 2010 (in US Dollars and in thousands) 10. Taxation continued Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to set off current tax assets against current tax liabilities and when the deferred income taxes relate to the same fi scal authority. The following amounts, determined after appropriate offsetting, are presented in the consolidated balance sheet as of 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008: Deferred tax assets Deferred tax liabilities 2010 2009 2008 5,190 (2,502) 10,183 (8,970) 2,688 1,213 2,047 (6,160) (4,113) The movements in net deferred tax assets/(liabilities) for the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008 were as follows: Net deferred tax assets/(liabilities) as of beginning of the year Deferred tax benefi t Deferred tax on property, plant and equipment charged directly to revaluation reserve Deferred tax liabilities arising on acquisition of subsidiaries (Note 2) Translation difference Net deferred tax assets/(liabilities) as of end of the year 2010 2009 2008 1,213 1,540 – – (65) 2,688 (4,113) 7,421 (2,541) – 446 1,213 (3,801) 460 – (2,630) 1,858 (4,113) 11. Long-term VAT recoverable, net As of 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008 the balance of long-term VAT recoverable was accumulated on continuing capital expenditures and increased investments in working capital. Management expects that these balances will not be recovered within the twelve months after the balance sheet date. As of 31 December 2010, an allowance for estimated irrecoverable long-term VAT of US$3,746 thousand was recorded by the Group (2009: US$4,537 thousand, 2008: US$1,437 thousand). 12. Biological assets The balances of non-current biological assets were as follows as of 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008: Milk cows, boars, sows, units Orchards, hectare Other non-current bearer biological assets Total bearer non-current biological assets Non-current cattle and pigs, units Total consumable non-current biological assets Total non-current biological assets 2010 2009 2008 Thousand units Carrying amount Thousand units Carrying amount Thousand units Carrying amount 13.1 1.87 5.9 13,997 25,768 714 40,479 2,809 2,809 43,288 11.5 2.4 6.6 9,560 23,478 530 33,568 2,667 2,667 36,235 10.2 2.11 8.6 6,033 19,934 526 26,493 2,987 2,987 29,480 The balances of current biological assets were as follows as of 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008: Breeders held for hatchery eggs production, units 2,360 39,530 1,886 35,845 1,420 19,323 2010 2009 2008 Thousand units Carrying amount Thousand units Carrying amount Thousand units Carrying amount Total bearer current biological assets Broiler poultry, units Hatchery eggs, units Crops in fi elds, hectare Cattle and pigs, units Other current consumable biological assets Total consumable current biological assets Total current biological assets 26,371 20,179 76 61 39,530 43,287 5,724 36,940 9,118 811 95,880 24,258 19,334 58 44 35,845 36,957 6,310 26,260 6,714 892 77,133 14,297 12,690 70 43 135,410 112,978 19,323 23,126 3,866 26,840 10,386 554 64,772 84,095 Other current consumable biological assets include geese and other livestock. Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 65 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information The following table represents the changes in the carrying amounts of major biological assets during the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008: As of 1 January 2008 Increase due to purchases Gains arising from change in fair value of biological assets less costs to sell Transfer to consumable biological assets Transfer to bearing non-current biological assets Decrease due to sale Decrease due to harvest Translation difference As of 31 December 2008 Increase due to purchases Gains/(losses) arising from change in fair value of biological assets less costs to sell Transfer to consumable biological assets Transfer to bearing non-current biological assets Decrease due to sale Decrease due to harvest Translation difference As of 31 December 2009 Increase due to purchases Acquired through business combinations (Note 2) Gains/(losses) arising from change in fair value of biological assets less costs to sell Transfer to consumable biological assets Transfer to bearing non-current biological assets Decrease due to sale Decrease due to harvest Translation difference Crops in fi elds 26,229 7,431 92,705 – – – (93,553) (5,972) 26,840 7,323 118,257 – – – (125,193) (967) 26,260 3,135 2,234 160,106 – – – (154,791) (4) Orchards 27,100 185 15,239 – – – (13,335) (9,255) 19,934 1,434 8,578 – – – (5,631) (837) 23,478 1,537 – 10,104 – – – (9,455) 104 Breeders held for hatchery eggs production Broiler poultry Milk cows, boars, sows 23,710 5,238 22,798 26 80,106 (72,914) – – (6,917) (9,900) 19,323 6,635 66,934 (50,617) – – (5,313) (1,117) 35,845 8,176 – 72,341 (69,968) – – (6,957) 93 353,078 72,914 – – (414,073) (11,617) 23,126 14,720 408,338 50,615 – – (458,654) (1,188) 36,957 2,830 – 504,092 69,968 – – (570,647) 87 8,305 655 7,231 (953) 4,475 (661) (9,890) (3,129) 6,033 265 8,443 (825) 2,167 (192) (6,023) (308) 9,560 176 3,411 10,599 (1,782) 2,162 (529) (9,611) 11 Non-current cattle and pigs Cattle, pigs 6,491 23 10,538 5,642 1,240 (63) 859 (12) (3,904) (1,647) 2,987 672 (106) (59) 816 (3) (1,539) (101) 2,667 65 71 (1,976) (295) 3,724 (7) (1,449) 9 36,091 1,016 (5,334) (6,135) (26,201) (5,231) 10,386 1,710 19,801 884 (2,983) (9,745) (13,051) (288) 6,714 1,756 3,560 23,792 2,077 (5,886) (8,371) (14,535) 11 As of 31 December 2010 36,940 25,768 39,530 43,287 13,997 2,809 9,118 13. Other non-current assets The balances of other non-current assets were as follows as of 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008: Packaging and containers Goodwill (Note 2) Long-term loans to employees and related parties Other investments Other non-current assets Total 2010 7,757 2,812 1,039 273 2,370 14,251 2009 5,592 – 708 273 2,144 8,717 2008 3,458 – 95 283 2,050 5,886 Long-term loans to employees and related parties are interest free and measured at amortised cost using the effective interest rate method. 66 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements continued For the year ended 31 December 2010 (in US Dollars and in thousands) 14. Inventories The balances of inventories were as follows as of 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008: Components for mixed fodder production Other raw materials Sunfl ower oil Packaging materials Spare parts Mixed fodder Other inventories Total 2010 2009 2008 83,477 14,345 4,234 4,092 3,831 2,231 1,281 70,568 9,099 2,020 3,283 3,558 2,156 1,576 21,748 6,998 510 3,437 2,780 1,590 1,055 113,491 92,260 38,118 As of 31 December 2010, inventories with carrying amount of US$62,500 thousand (2009 and 2008: nil) were pledged as collateral to secure banks borrowings (Note 22). 15. Agricultural produce The balances of agricultural produce were as follows as of 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008: Chicken meat Other meat Grain Fruits, vegetables and other crops Total agricultural produce 2010 2009 2008 Thousand tons Carrying amount Thousand tons Carrying amount Thousand tons Carrying amount 15.333 N/A 455 N/A 24,403 4,058 77,069 8,320 113,850 5.531 N/A 396 N/A 7,405 3,167 48,641 7,014 66,227 4.887 N/A 306 N/A 7,881 3,394 24,695 6,795 42,765 16. Other current assets, net Other current assets were as follows as of 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008: Prepayments to suppliers and prepaid expenses VAT bonds Short-term advances, fi nance aid to and promissory notes from related parties (Note 7) Loans to employees Government grants receivable (Note 27) Other receivables Less: allowance for irrecoverable amounts Total 2010 2009 2008 12,202 5,038 2,304 634 – 2,320 (1,167) 10,585 – 1,061 941 29 3,418 (737) 7,867 – 976 1,391 3,397 2,346 (607) 21,331 15,297 15,370 As of 31 December 2010 VAT bonds were represented by debt securities with face value of US$5,725 thousand, which were issued by the State to Ukrainian subsidiaries of the Group as part of conversion of the Group’s VAT recoverable. The VAT bonds are stated at their fair value, which is determined by reference to market quotations. Subsequent to 31 December 2010, the Group sold the VAT bonds for a cash consideration of US$5,297 thousand. As of 31 December 2009 and 2008, government grants receivable were mainly represented by amounts due from the state for poultry and cattle processed during the last months of 2009 and 2008, respectively. 17. Taxes recoverable and prepaid, net Taxes recoverable and prepaid were as follows as of 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008: VAT recoverable Miscellaneous taxes prepaid Less: allowance for irrecoverable VAT Total 2010 2009 2008 116,534 1,472 (10,182) 69,890 1,889 (4,821) 49,736 777 (4,175) 107,824 66,958 46,338 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 18. Trade accounts receivable, net The balances of trade accounts receivable were as follows as of 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008: Agricultural operations Due from related parties (Note 7) Sunfl ower oil sales Less: allowance for irrecoverable amounts Total 67 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information 2010 2009 2008 44,888 7,756 1,536 (785) 37,481 3,176 3,432 (712) 26,663 2,791 2,957 (880) 53,395 43,377 31,531 The allowance for irrecoverable amounts is estimated at the level of 25% of trade accounts receivable on sales of poultry meat which are over 30 days past due (for trade accounts receivable on other sales – over 60 days). Trade accounts receivable on sales of poultry meat which are aged over 270 days and trade accounts receivable on other sales which are aged over 360 days are provided in full. The Group also performs specifi c analysis of trade accounts receivable due from individual customers to determine whether any further adjustments are required to the allowance for irrecoverable amounts assessed on the percentages disclosed above. Based on the results of such review as of 31 December 2010 the Group determined that trade accounts receivable on sales of poultry meat of US$305 thousand were overdue but do not require allowance for irrecoverable amounts. The aging of trade accounts receivable that were impaired as of 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008 was as follows: Trade accounts receivable Allowance for irrecoverable amounts 2010 2009 2008 2010 2009 2008 Trade accounts receivable on sales of poultry meat: Over 30 but less than 270 days Over 270 days Total trade accounts receivable on sales of poultry meat Trade accounts receivable on other sales: Over 60 but less than 360 days Over 360 days Total trade accounts receivable on other sales 408 79 487 141 569 710 546 139 685 397 337 734 280 561 841 268 182 450 Total 1,197 1,419 1,291 19. Short-term bank deposits Short-term bank deposits were as follows as of 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008: (102) (79) (181) (35) (569) (604) (785) (137) (139) (276) (99) (337) (436) (712) (70) (561) (631) (67) (182) (249) (880) Currency UAH US$ Total Effective rate 15.93% 8.37% 2010 59,460 75,000 134,460 Effective rate 16.14% – 2009 7,632 – 7,632 Effective rate 16.69% 10.98% 2008 1,248 24,094 25,342 As of 31 December 2010, the short-term deposits were placed with Ukrainian banks for periods of six months to one year and had the following maturity at the reporting date: With maturity within one month With maturity in the second to the third month inclusive With maturity in the fourth to the sixth month inclusive Total 2010 30,000 49,931 54,529 134,460 As of 31 December 2009, the balances of short-term deposits with UniCreditBank for the total amount of US$7,619 thousand represented security for bank guarantees issued against the Group’s liabilities under grain fi nancing arrangements (Note 25, 26). 68 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements continued For the year ended 31 December 2010 (in US Dollars and in thousands) 20. Cash and cash equivalents The balances of cash and cash equivalents were as follows as of 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008: Cash in hand and with banks Short-term deposits with banks Total The balances of term deposits included in cash equivalents were as follows as of 31 December 2008: Currency US$ UAH 2010 2009 2008 39,321 – 22,248 – 18,975 35,097 39,321 22,248 54,072 Effective rate 11.71% 18.00% 2008 32,500 2,597 – 35,097 21. Shareholders’ equity Share capital As of 31 December the authorised, issued and fully paid share capital of MHP S.A. comprised of the following number of shares: Number of shares authorised for issue Number of shares issued and fully paid Number of shares outstanding 2010 2009 2008 170,000,000 170,000,000 170,000,000 110,770,000 110,770,000 110,770,000 107,854,856 110,770,000 110,770,000 The authorised share capital as of 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008 was EUR 340,000 thousand represented by 170,000,000 shares with par value of EUR 2 each. As of 1 January 2008 the issued share capital of MHP S.A. was EUR 200,040 thousand (US$251,311 thousand) and consisted of 100,020,000 ordinary shares. The share capital contributions as of that date were fully paid in cash for US$50 thousand and by exchange of 100% shareholding in RHL. The fair value of the exchange was US$251,261 thousand, determined by an independent appraiser as of the date of the contribution. On 15 May 2008 MHP S.A. issued 10,750,000 new ordinary shares. After the issue MHP S.A.’s issued share capital consists of 110,770,000 ordinary shares at par value EUR 2 each. The offering was completed at US$15 per share. The increase in MHP S.A. share capital amounted to US$33,194 thousand at the transaction date. Share premium on issue constituted US$128,056 thousand at the transaction date. The net expenses related to the issue amounted to US$9,300 thousand. Net proceeds, after deducting expenses, of the offering amounted to US$151,950 thousand. All shares have equal voting rights and rights to receive dividends, which are payable at the discretion of the Group. Treasury shares During the year ended 31 December 2010, the Group acquired, under the share buy-back programme, 3,370,144 shares for a cash consideration of US$46,288 thousand, of which 455,000 shares were further partially used for the compensation scheme (Note 32). The excess of the fair value of shares transferred over the carrying value of the shares bought back in the amount of US$750 thousand was recognised as an adjustment to additional paid-in capital. Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 69 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information 22. Bank borrowings The following table summarizes bank loans and credit lines outstanding as of 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008: Bank Foreign banks Foreign banks Ukrainian banks Ukrainian banks Total bank borrowings Less: Short-term bank borrowings and current portion of long-term bank borrowings Total long-term bank borrowings Weighted average interest rate 5.52% 3.12% 6.25% 7.75% Currency US$ EUR US$ UAH Weighted average interest rate 3.24% 8.86% 23.82% 2010 78,642 56,712 135,354 36,750 26,414 63,164 198,518 2009 – 81,873 81,873 94,000 19,960 113,960 195,833 (140,092) 58,426 (139,790) 56,043 Weighted average interest rate 5.43% 2008 – 78,697 78,697 6.78% 109,000 – 109,000 187,697 (130,241) 57,456 The Group’s borrowings are drawn from various banks as term loans, credit line facilities and overdrafts. Repayment terms of principal amounts of bank borrowings vary from monthly repayment to repayment on maturity depending on the agreement reached with each bank. The interest on the borrowings drawn with Ukrainian banks is payable on a monthly or quarterly basis. Interest on borrowings drawn with foreign banks is payable semi-annually. Term loans and credit line facilities were as follows as of 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008: Credit lines Term loans Total bank borrowings 2010 2009 2008 141,806 56,712 129,103 66,730 132,560 55,137 198,518 195,833 187,697 The following table summarises fi xed and fl oating interest rates bank loans and credit lines held by the Group as of 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008: Fixed interest rate Floating interest rate Total Bank loans and credit lines outstanding as of 31 December 2010 were repayable as follows: Within one year In the second year In the third to fi fth year inclusive After fi ve years Total 2010 2009 2008 158,750 39,768 47,386 148,447 39,756 147,941 198,518 195,833 187,697 2010 Foreign Ukrainian Total 76,928 22,001 31,377 5,048 63,164 – – – 140,092 22,001 31,377 5,048 135,354 63,164 198,518 As of 31 December 2010, the Group had available undrawn facilities of US$168,323 thousand. These undrawn facilities expire during the period from January 2011 until December 2018. The Group as well as particular subsidiaries of the Group have to comply with certain covenants imposed by the banks providing the loans. The main covenants which are to be complied by the Group are as follows: total equity to total assets ratio, net debt to EBITDA ratio, EBITDA to interest expenses ratio and current ratio. The Group subsidiaries are also required to obtain approval with lenders regarding the property to be used as collateral. As of 31 December 2010, the Group had borrowings of US$55,751 thousand that were secured. These borrowings were secured by property, plant and equipment with the carrying amount of US$5,247 thousand (Note 8) and inventories with the carrying amount of US$62,500 thousand (Note 14). 70 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements continued For the year ended 31 December 2010 (in US Dollars and in thousands) 23. Bonds issued Bonds issued and outstanding as of 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008 were as follows: 10.25% Senior Notes due in 2011 10.25% Senior Notes due in 2015 Unamortised premium on bonds issued Unamortised debt issue cost Total Less: Current portion of bonds issued Total long-term portion of bonds issued 2010 2009 2008 9,967 584,767 4,640 (26,596) 250,000 – – (1,954) 250,000 – – (3,097) 572,778 248,046 246,903 (9,892) – – 562,886 248,046 246,903 10.25% Senior Notes In November 2006, MHP S.A. issued US$250 million 10.25% Senior Notes (“Senior Notes”), due in November 2011, at par. The Senior Notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior basis by MHP, Peremoga, Druzhba Nova, Oril, MZVKK, Zernoproduct and Druzhba. Interest on the Senior Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears. Up to 30 November 2009, the Group had the right to redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the Senior Notes with the net proceeds of any offering of MHP S.A. common equity at a redemption price of 110.25% of the principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest up to the redemption date. This option was not exercised by the Group. These Senior Notes are subject to certain restrictive covenants including, but not limited to, limitations on the incurrence of additional indebtedness, restrictions on mergers or consolidations, limitations on liens and dispositions of assets and limitations on transactions with affi liates. The effective interest rate on the Senior Notes is 11.43% per annum. The notes are listed on London Stock Exchange. If the Group fails to comply with the covenants imposed, all outstanding Senior Notes will become due and payable without further action or notice. If change of control occurs the Group shall make an offer to each holder of the Senior Notes to purchase such Senior Notes at a purchase price in cash in an amount equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest and additional amounts, if any. On 29 April 2010, MHP S.A. issued US$330,000 thousand 10.25% Senior Notes due in 2015 for an issue price of 101.452% of principal amount. In addition, as of 13 May 2010 the MHP S.A. exchanged 96.01% (US$240,033 thousand) of US$250,000 thousand of the existing 10.25% Senior Notes due in 2011 for the new Notes due 2015. As a result of the exchange, new Senior Notes were issued for the total par value of US$254,767 thousand. 24. Finance lease obligations Long-term fi nance lease obligations represent amounts due under agreements for lease of trucks, agricultural machinery and equipment with Ukrainian and foreign companies. As of 31 December 2010, the weighted average interest rates on fi nance lease obligations were 8.92% and 7.91% for fi nance lease obligations denominated in EUR and US$, respectively. The following are the minimum lease payments and present value of minimum lease payments under the fi nance lease agreements as of 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008: Payable within one year Payable in the second year Payable in the third to fi fth year inclusive Payable after fi fth year Less: Future fi nance charges Minimum lease payments Present value of minimum lease payments 2010 2009 2008 2010 2009 2008 28,350 18,775 22,353 – 31,094 25,535 26,187 – 28,928 24,697 32,408 684 23,827 16,304 20,684 – 24,458 21,309 23,237 – 21,625 19,632 27,776 564 69,478 82,816 86,717 60,815 69,004 69,597 (8,663) (13,812) (17,120) – – – Present value of fi nance lease obligations 60,815 69,004 69,597 60,815 69,004 69,597 Less: Current portion Finance lease obligations, long-term portion (23,827) (24,458) (21,625) 36,988 44,546 47,972 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 25. Trade accounts payable Trade accounts payable were as follows as of 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008: Trade accounts payable to third parties Payables due to related parties Total 71 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information 2010 2009 2008 18,986 26 72,361 19 22,145 25 19,012 72,380 22,170 As of 31 December 2009 trade accounts payable included liabilities that bear a fl oating rate of interest under grain purchase fi nancing arrangements in the amount of US$51,970 thousand and accrued interest of US$1,932 thousand (2010: nil, 2008: liabilities of US$6,205 thousand and accrued interest of US$136 thousand). 26. Other current liabilities Other current liabilities were as follows as of 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008: Accrued payroll and payroll related taxes Accounts payable for property, plant and equipment Advances from and other payables due to third parties Advances from related parties (Note 7) Payables on other fi nancing arrangements Deferred income (Note 27) Other payables Total 2010 2009 2008 24,528 4,396 4,137 200 – – 4,781 25,268 6,340 3,629 200 6,370 – 3,621 15,151 8,116 2,470 338 12,484 789 2,549 38,042 45,428 41,897 As of 31 December 2009 payables on other fi nancing arrangements represented short-term credit facility received from a grain supplier at LIBOR+3.27%. As of 31 December 2008 payables on other fi nancing arrangements represented credit facility received at a fi xed rate of 8.75% with maturity on 30 June 2009. 27. VAT refunds and other government grants income The Ukrainian legislation provides for a number of different grants and tax benefi ts for companies involved in agricultural operations. The below-mentioned grants and similar privileges are established by Verkhovna Rada (the Parliament) of Ukraine, as well as by the Ministry of Agrarian Policy of Ukraine, the Ministry of Finance of Ukraine, the State Committee of Water Industry, the customs authorities and local district administrations. Government grants recognised by the Group as income during the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008 were as follows: VAT refunds Fruits and vine cultivation Processing of live animals Other government grants Total 2010 2009 2008 80,223 1,219 – 616 65,606 1,145 780 281 59,338 468 46,146 1,711 82,058 67,812 107,663 VAT refunds for agricultural industry – According to the Law of Ukraine “On the Value Added Tax”, companies that generated not less than 75% of gross revenues for the previous tax year from sales of own agricultural products are entitled to retain VAT on sales of agricultural products, net of VAT paid on purchases, for use in agricultural production. Through 31 December 2008 the Group’s net VAT liability was transferred to a special account restricted for payments for goods and services related to agricultural activities. Accordingly, the corresponding VAT liability to be refunded at 31 December 2008 in the amount of US$789 thousand was recorded in the Group’s consolidated fi nancial statements as deferred income, as the income recognition criteria were considered to be met only when payments are made. In accordance with the Tax Code of Ukraine issued in December 2010 (Note 28), the VAT rate will be decreased from currently effective 20% to 17% from 1 January 2014. The special VAT regime for agricultural industry will be effective through 1 January 2018. Included in VAT refunds for the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008 were specifi c VAT subsidies for production and sale of milk and live animals for further processing in the amount of US$2,125 thousand, US$1,511 thousand and US$2,075, respectively. Government grants on fruits and vine cultivation – In accordance with the Law “On State Budget of Ukraine” two companies of the Group were entitled to receive grants for the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008 for creation and cultivating of orchards, vines and berry-fi elds. 72 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements continued For the year ended 31 December 2010 (in US Dollars and in thousands) 27. VAT refunds and other government grants income continued Government grants on processing of live animals – During the year ended 31 December 2008, the Law “On State Budget of Ukraine” established subsidies for companies engaged in processing of live animals (chicken and other poultry, cows and pigs). This subsidy was provided to the Group’s chicken farms in the form of payment for each item of poultry slaughtered at the farms. This subsidy was also available to the Group’s beef and pork processing facilities. Effective 1 January 2009, the government suspended this type of subsidies. Other government grants – Other government grants recognised as income during the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008 mainly comprised of subsidies related to crop growing. In addition to the government grant income recognised by the Group, the Group receives a grant to compensate agricultural producers for costs used to fi nance operations. Agricultural producers are entitled to compensation of fi nance costs incurred on bank borrowings in accordance with the Law “On State Budget of Ukraine” during the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008. The eligibility, application and tender procedures related to such grants are defi ned and controlled by the Ministry of Agrarian Policy of Ukraine. These grants were recognised as a reduction in the associated fi nance costs and during the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008 were US$4,999 thousand, US$900 thousand and US$2,406 thousand, respectively (Note 34). 28. Contingencies and contractual commitments Operating environment − The principal business activities of the Group are within Ukraine. Emerging markets such as Ukraine are subject to different risks than more developed markets, including economic, political and social, and legal and legislative risks. As has happened in the past, actual or perceived fi nancial problems or an increase in the perceived risks associated with investing in emerging economies could adversely affect the investment climate in Ukraine and the Ukraine’s economy in general. Laws and regulations affecting businesses operating in Ukraine are subject to rapid changes and the Group’s assets and operations could be at risk if there are any adverse changes in the political and business environment. The global fi nancial turmoil has negatively affected Ukraine’s fi nancial and capital markets in 2008 and 2009. While due to the nature of the Group’s business the Group’s revenues and margins were not affected by these factors, the Group’s net profi t was impacted by the signifi cant depreciation of Ukrainian currency during the year ended 31 December 2008. The Ukrainian currency remained relatively stable in 2010 and 2009. The Ukraine’s economy returned to growth in 2010. Although signifi cant economic uncertainties remain, Ukrainian economy experienced a 4.2% GDP growth in 2010 and further recovery is expected in 2011. Taxation − Ukrainian tax authorities are increasingly directing their attention to the business community as a result of the overall Ukrainian economic environment. In respect of this, the local and national tax environment in Ukraine is constantly changing and subject to inconsistent application, interpretation and enforcement. Non-compliance with Ukrainian laws and regulations can lead to the imposition of severe penalties and interest. Future tax examinations could raise issues or assessments which are contrary to the Group companies’ tax fi lings. Such assessments could include taxes, penalties and interest, and these amounts could be material. While the Group believes it has complied with local tax legislation, there have been many new tax and foreign currency laws and related regulations introduced in recent years which are not always clearly written. In December 2010, the Tax Code of Ukraine was offi cially published. In its entirety, the Tax Code of Ukraine will become effective on 1 January 2011, while some of its provisions will take effect later (such as, Section III dealing with corporate income tax, will come into force from 1 April 2011). Apart from changes in CIT rates from 1 April 2011 and planned abandonment of VAT refunds for agricultural industry from 1 January 2018, as discussed in Notes 10 and 27, respectively, the Tax Code also changes various other taxation rules. As of the date these fi nancial statements were authorised for issue, additional clarifi cations and guidance on application of the new tax rules were not published, and certain revisions were proposed for consideration of the Ukrainian Parliament. While the Group’s management believes the enactment of the Tax Code of Ukraine will not have a signifi cant negative impact on the Group’s fi nancial results in the foreseeable future, as of the date these fi nancial statements were authorised for issue management was in the process of assessing of effects of its adoption on the operations of the Group. Legal issues − The Group is involved in litigations and other claims that are in the ordinary course of its business activities. Management believes that the resolution of such matters will not have a material impact on its fi nancial position or operating results. Contractual commitments on purchase of property, plant and equipment − During the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008, the companies of the Group entered into a number of contracts with foreign suppliers for the purchase of property plant and equipment for development of agricultural operations. As of 31 December 2010, purchase commitments on such contracts were primarily related to construction of Vinnytsia poultry complex and amounted to US$79,746 thousand (2009: US$2,307 thousand; 2008: US$20,927 thousand). Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 73 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information Commitments on operating lease of land − The Group has the following non-cancellable contractual obligations as to the operating lease of land as of 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008: Within one year In the second to the fi fth year inclusive Thereafter Total 2010 2009 2008 11,855 37,037 51,688 6,886 23,868 38,256 5,264 19,218 38,193 100,580 69,010 62,675 Ukrainian legislation provides for a ban on sales of agricultural land plots till 1 January 2012. Although as of the date these fi nancial statements were authorised for issue, the Parliament of Ukraine was in discussion regarding its prolongation and signifi cant uncertainties as to the extension of the ban remain. 29. Risk management policies Capital risk management − The Group manages its capital to ensure that entities of the Group will be able to continue as a going concern while maximising the return to the equity holders through maintaining a balance between the higher returns that might be possible with higher levels of borrowings and the security afforded by a sound capital position. The management of the Group reviews the capital structure on a regular basis. Based on the results of this review, the Group takes steps to balance its overall capital structure through new share issues and as the issue of new debt or the redemption of existing debt. The Group’s target is to achieve a leverage ratio of not higher than 2.5. Prior to 2010 the Group defi ned its leverage ratio as the proportion of debt to adjusted operating profi t. During the year ended 31 December 2010, the Group changed the defi nition of its leverage ratio, which now is determined as the proportion of net debt to adjusted operating profi t. As of 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008 the leverage ratio was as follows: Bank borrowings (Note 22) Bonds issued (Note 23) Finance lease obligations (Note 24) Payables on other fi nancing arrangements (Note 26) Debt Less: Cash and cash equivalents and Short-term bank deposits Net debt Operating profi t Adjustments for: Depreciation and amortisation expense (Notes 31, 32) Loss on impairment of property, plant and equipment (Note 8) Adjusted operating profi t Debt to adjusted operating profi t Net debt to adjusted operating profi t 2010 2009 2008 198,518 572,778 60,815 – 195,833 248,046 69,004 6,370 187,697 246,903 69,597 12,484 832,111 519,253 516,681 (173,781) (29,880) (79,414) 658,330 489,373 437,267 256,784 217,980 243,506 67,902 – 51,677 1,304 56,938 11,767 324,686 270,961 312,211 2.56 2.03 1.92 1.81 1.65 1.40 Debt is defi ned as bank borrowings, bonds issued, fi nance lease obligations, and payables on other fi nancing arrangements. Net debt is defi ned as debt less cash and cash equivalents and bank deposits. For the purposes of the leverage ratio, debt does not include interest-bearing liabilities, which are included in trade accounts payable (Note 25). Adjusted operating profi t is defi ned as operating profi t adjusted for the depreciation expense and losses and gains believed by the management to be non-recurring in nature, as this measure produces results substantially comparable to those reviewed for the purposes of fi nancial covenants under the Group’s borrowings. Major categories of fi nancial instruments Financial assets: Cash and cash equivalents Short-term bank deposits Trade accounts receivable, net Government grants receivable (Note 16) Loans to employees and related parties (Notes 13 and 16) VAT bonds (Note 16) Other receivables (Note 16) Total fi nancial assets 2010 2009 2008 39,321 134,460 53,395 – 1,673 5,038 2,320 22,248 7,632 43,377 29 1,649 – 3,418 54,072 25,342 31,531 3,397 1,486 – 2,346 236,207 78,353 118,174 74 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements continued For the year ended 31 December 2010 (in US Dollars and in thousands) 29. Risk management policies continued Financial liabilities: Bank borrowings (Note 22) Bonds issued Finance lease obligations Accounts payable for property, plant and equipment Interest accrued Trade accounts payable Other long-term payables Other current liabilities (Note 26) Total fi nancial liabilities 2010 2009 2008 198,518 572,778 60,815 4,396 11,573 19,012 401 4,781 195,833 248,046 69,004 6,340 3,526 72,380 310 9,991 187,697 246,903 69,597 8,116 3,520 22,170 400 15,033 872,274 605,430 553,436 The main risks inherent to the Group’s operations are those related to credit risk exposures, liquidity risk, market movements in interest rates and foreign exchange rates, potential negative impact of livestock diseases, and commodity price and procurement risk. Credit risk − The Group is exposed to credit risk which is the risk that one party to a fi nancial instrument will fail to discharge an obligation and cause the other party to incur a fi nancial loss. The Group structures the levels of credit risk it undertakes by placing limits on the amount of risk accepted in relation to one customer or group of customers. The approved credit period for major groups of customers, which include franchises, distributors and supermarkets, is set at 5-21 days. Limits on the level of credit risk by customer are approved and monitored on a regular basis by the management of the Group. The Group’s management assesses amounts receivable from the customers for recoverability starting from 30 and 60 days for receivables on sales of poultry meat and receivables on other sales, respectively. No assessment is performed immediately from the date credit period is expired. About 31% of trade receivables comprise amounts due from 12 large supermarket chains, which have the longest contractual receivable settlement period among customers. Liquidity risk − Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not be able to settle all liabilities as they are due. The Group’s liquidity position is carefully monitored and managed. The Group has in place a detailed budgeting and cash forecasting process to help ensure that it has adequate cash available to meet its payment obligations. The following table details the Group’s remaining contractual maturity for its non-derivative fi nancial liabilities. The table has been drawn up based on the undiscounted cash fl ows of fi nancial liabilities based on the earliest date on which the Group can be required to pay. The table includes both interest and principal cash fl ows as of 31 December 2010. The amounts in the table may not be equal to the balance sheet carrying amounts since the table includes all cash outfl ows on an undiscounted basis. 2010 Bank borrowings Bonds issued Finance lease obligations Total Carrying amount Contractual amounts Less than 1 year From 2nd to 5th year After 5th year 198,518 572,778 60,815 206,635 865,479 69,478 144,259 70,927 28,350 57,101 794,552 41,128 832,111 1,141,592 243,536 892,781 5,275 – – 5,275 The Group’s target is to maintain its current ratio, defi ned as a proportion of current assets to current liabilities, at the level of not less than 1.2. As of 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008, the current ratio was as follows: Current assets Current liabilities Current ratio 2010 2009 2008 719,082 242,438 2.97 426,977 285,582 1.5 337,631 219,453 1.5 Currency risk − Currency risk is the risk that the value of a fi nancial instrument will fl uctuate due to changes in foreign exchange rates. The Group undertakes certain transactions denominated in foreign currencies. The Group does not use any derivatives to manage foreign currency risk exposure, at the same time the management of the Group sets limits on the level of exposure by currencies. Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 75 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information The carrying amounts of the Group’s foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities as of 31 December 2010 were as follows: Assets Trade accounts receivable Other current assets, net Short-term bank deposits Cash and cash equivalents Total assets Liabilities Trade accounts payable Other current liabilities Interest accrued Short-term bank borrowings Short-term fi nance lease obligations Current portion of bonds issued Total current liabilities Long-term bank borrowings Bonds issued Long-term fi nance lease obligations Total non-current liabilities Total liabilities 2010 2009 2008 US$ denominated EUR denominated US$ denominated EUR denominated US$ denominated EUR Denominated 1,954 386 75,000 27,217 104,557 104 – 11,163 90,050 8,323 9,967 119,607 26,700 584,767 23,818 – – – 128 128 2,798 2,587 311 23,628 15,504 – 44,828 33,085 – 13,170 3,910 – – 17,088 20,998 54,482 6,385 2,686 94,000 5,447 – 163,000 – 250,000 15,797 – – – 37 37 4,127 4,232 591 25,830 19,010 – 53,790 56,043 – 28,750 3,987 – 24,094 40,357 68,438 1,694 6 – 109,000 2,682 – 113,382 – 250,000 5,854 2 – – 12 14 4,591 5,790 – 21,241 18,943 – 50,565 57,456 – 42,118 635,285 46,255 265,797 84,793 255,854 99,574 754,892 91,083 428,797 138,583 369,236 150,139 The below details the Group’s sensitivity to strengthening of the Ukrainian Hryvnia against US Dollar and EUR by 5% and weakening of the Ukrainian Hryvnia against US Dollar and EUR by 10% (2009 and 2008: Group’s sensitivity to strengthening of the Ukrainian Hryvnia against US Dollar and EUR by 5% and weakening of the Ukrainian Hryvnia against US Dollar and EUR by 15%). This sensitivity rate represents management’s assessment of the reasonably possible change in foreign exchange rates. The sensitivity analysis includes only outstanding foreign currency denominated monetary items and adjusts their translation at the period end for expected change in foreign currency rates. Profi t/(loss) Profi t/(loss) US$-denominated 2010 2009 2008 32,517/ (65,034) 20,390/ (61,170) 15,040/ (45,120) EUR-denominated 2010 2009 2008 4,548/ (9,096) 6,927/ (20,782) 7,506/ (22,519) The effect of foreign currency sensitivity on shareholders’ equity is equal to that on profi t or loss. During the year ended 31 December 2010, the Ukrainian Hryvnia appreciated against the EUR by 3.1% and depreciated against the US Dollar by 1.8% (2009 – depreciated both against the EUR and the US Dollars by 5.5% and by 3.7%, respectively; 2008 – depreciated both against the EUR and the US Dollar by 46.3% and by 52.5%, respectively). As a result, during the year ended 31 December 2010 the Group recognised net foreign exchange gains in the amount of US$10,965 thousand (2009 and 2008 – foreign exchange losses of US$23,580 thousand and US$187,127 thousand, respectively) in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income. Group management believes that the currency risk is mitigated by the existence of US$-denominated proceeds from sales sunfl ower oil, grain and chicken meat, which are substantially suffi cient for servicing the Group’s US$-denominated liabilities and were as follows during the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008: Sunfl ower oil and related products Chicken meat Grains Other agricultural segment products Total export revenue 2010 2009 2008 188,156 29,147 22,454 290 104,864 17,650 30,109 270 109,899 10,686 – 174 240,047 152,893 120,759 76 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements continued For the year ended 31 December 2010 (in US Dollars and in thousands) 29. Risk management policies continued Interest rate risk − Interest rate risk arises from the possibility that changes in interest rates will affect the value of the fi nancial instruments. The major part of the Group’s borrowings bear fi xed interest rates. For variable rate borrowings, interest is linked to LIBOR and EUROLIBOR. The below details the Group’s sensitivity to increase or decrease of fl oating rate by 10%. The analysis was applied to interest bearing liabilities (bank borrowings, fi nance lease obligations and accounts payable under grain purchase fi nancing arrangements) based on the assumption that the amount of liability outstanding as of the balance sheet date was outstanding for the whole year. Profi t/(loss) 2010 2009 2008 LIBOR EURIBOR LIBOR EURIBOR LIBOR EURIBOR 11,825/ (11,825) 5,778/ (5,778) 9,741/ (9,741) 6,490/ (6,490) 12,209/ (12,209) 6,496/ (6,496) NBU discount rate 500/ (500) The effect of interest rate sensitivity on shareholders’ equity is equal to that on profi t or loss. Livestock diseases risk − The Group’s agro-industrial business is subject to risks of outbreaks of various diseases. The Group faces the risk of outbreaks of diseases, which are highly contagious and destructive to susceptible livestock, such as avian infl uenza or bird fl u for its poultry operations. These and other diseases could result in mortality losses. Disease control measures were adopted by the Group to minimise and manage this risk. The Group’s management is satisfi ed that its current existing risk management and quality control processes are effective and suffi cient to prevent any outbreak of livestock diseases and related losses. Commodity price and procurement risk − Commodity price risk arises from the risk of an adverse effect on current or future earnings from fl uctuations in the prices of commodities. To mitigate this risk the Group continues expansion of its grain growing segment, as part of vertical integration strategy, and also accumulates suffi cient commodity stock to meet its production needs. 30. Revenue Revenue for the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008 was as follows: Poultry and related operations segment Revenue from sales of chicken meat Revenue from sunfl ower oil sales Revenue from other poultry related sales Other agricultural operations segment Revenue from sales of other meat Other agricultural sales Grain growing segment Revenue from sales of grains Total revenue from continuing operations 31. Cost of sales Cost of sales for the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008 was as follows: Poultry and related operations Other agricultural operations Grain growing operations Total For the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008, cost of sales comprised the following: Costs of raw materials and other inventory used Payroll and related expenses Depreciation and amortisation expense Other costs Total 2010 2009 2008 562,982 179,982 57,273 443,654 101,274 32,215 501,013 109,974 49,044 800,237 577,143 660,031 79,185 29,153 60,116 27,993 66,122 26,980 108,338 88,109 93,102 35,631 45,752 49,777 944,206 711,004 802,910 2010 2009 2008 546,494 104,372 29,771 375,525 85,352 38,286 437,865 91,492 42,353 680,637 499,163 571,710 2010 2009 2008 475,093 101,425 56,799 47,320 338,114 79,746 43,479 37,824 390,421 86,440 51,541 43,308 680,637 499,163 571,710 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 77 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information By-products arising from the agricultural production process are measured at net realisable value, and this value is deducted from the cost of the main product. 32. Selling, general and administrative expenses Selling, general and administrative expenses for the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008 were as follows: Payroll and related expense Bonus to key management personnel Services Depreciation expense Fuel and other materials used Advertising expense Representative costs and business trips Insurance expense Bank services and conversion fees Other Total 2010 2009 2008 35,948 7,628 17,517 11,103 9,166 9,094 8,611 1,734 535 771 30,062 – 13,992 8,198 6,454 10,562 8,807 1,349 476 1,072 37,820 – 11,069 5,397 8,045 8,361 8,319 580 477 427 102,107 80,972 80,495 During the year-ended 31 December 2010 the Group paid a one-off bonus to one of the top managers in the form of 455,000 shares representing 0.4% of the share capital of MHP S.A. (Note 21). The amount recognised as part of Selling, general and administrative expenses, was measured as the sum of the fair value of the shares at grant date of US$6,483 thousand and the amount of payroll-related taxes of US$1,145 thousand. 33. Other operating expenses, net Other operating expenses for the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008 were as follows: Loss on impairment of VAT receivable Loss on impairment of accounts receivable Loss/(gain) on disposal of property, plant and equipment and other non-current assets Other Total other operating expenses Less: Other operating income Total other operating expenses, net 34. Finance costs, net Finance costs for the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008 were as follows: Interest on corporate bonds Interest on bank borrowings Interest on obligations under fi nance leases Interest on grain purchases fi nancing arrangements Bank commissions and other charges Government grants as compensation for the fi nance costs of agricultural producers (Note 27) Total fi nance costs Less: Finance costs included in cost of qualifying assets Total 2010 8,212 1,115 1,931 5,434 2009 7,803 1,791 (8) 5,623 2008 4,821 1,052 1,145 3,004 16,692 15,209 10,022 (942) (576) (600) 15,750 14,633 9,422 2010 2009 2008 50,911 8,539 5,979 3,049 1,921 (4,999) 26,822 12,996 7,279 3,463 1,301 (900) 31,300 11,332 5,584 3,456 2,397 (2,406) 65,400 50,961 51,663 (2,456) (144) – 62,944 50,817 51,663 For qualifying assets, the weighted average capitalisation rate on funds borrowed generally during the year ended 31 December 2010 was 10.6% (2009: 9.87%). Interest on corporate bonds for the years ended 31 December 2010, 2009 and 2008 includes amortisation of premium and debt issue costs on bonds issued in the amounts of US$1,526 thousand, US$1,197 thousand and US$1,611 thousand, respectively. 78 Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 Notes to the consolidated fi nancial statements continued For the year ended 31 December 2010 (in US Dollars and in thousands) 35. Pensions and retirement plans The employees of the Group receive pension benefi ts from the government in accordance with the laws and regulations of Ukraine. The Group’s contributions to the State Pension Fund are recorded in the consolidated statement of comprehensive income on the accrual basis. The Group companies are not liable for any supplementary pensions, post-retirement health care, insurance benefi ts or retirement indemnities to its current or former employees, other than pay-as-you-go expenses. During the year ended 31 December 2010 the Group remitted 33.2% for both CIT and FAT payers (2009 and 2008: 33.2% for CIT payers and 26.56% for FAT payers), of the aggregate employee’s salaries to the State Pension Fund subject to the following limits: Period 1 January 2008 – 31 March 2008 1 April 2008 – 30 June 2008 1 July 2008 – 30 September 2008 1 October 2008 – 31 December 2008 1 January 2009 – 31 October 2009 1 November 2009 – 31 December 2009 1 January 2010 – 31 March 2010 1 April 2010 – 30 June 2010 1 July 2010 – 30 September 2010 1 October 2010 – 30 November 2010 1 December 2010 – 31 December 2010 Limit per employee per month, US$ 624 649 667 536 430 464 545 555 557 569 579 The Group’s contributions to the State Pension Fund during the year ended 31 December 2010 amounted to US$34,024 thousand (2009: US$23,840 thousand; 2008: US$22,820 thousand). 36. Fair value of fi nancial instruments Estimated fair value disclosure of fi nancial instruments is made in accordance with the requirements of International Financial Reporting Standard 7 “Financial Instruments: Disclosure”. Fair value is defi ned as the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between knowledgeable willing parties in an arm’s length transaction, other than in forced or liquidation sale. As no readily available market exists for a large part of the Group’s fi nancial instruments, judgment is necessary in arriving at fair value, based on current economic conditions and specifi c risks attributable to the instrument. The estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Group could realise in a market exchange from the sale of its full holdings of a particular instrument. The fair value is estimated to be the same as the carrying value for cash and cash equivalents, trade and other accounts receivable, and trade and other accounts payable due to the short-term nature of the fi nancial instruments. The fair value of bank borrowings as of 31 December 2010 is estimated at US$199,185 thousand compared to carrying amount of US$198,518 thousand. The fair value of fi nance lease obligations as of 31 December 2010 is estimated at US$63,420 thousand compared to carrying amount of US$60,815 thousand. Fair value of these liabilities was estimated by discounting the expected future cash outfl ows by a market rate of interest. The fair value of Senior Notes due 2015 is estimated at US$613,339 thousand compared to the carrying value of US$562,886 thousand; the fair value of Senior Notes due 2011 is estimated at US$10,092 thousand compared to the carrying value of US$9,892 thousand. The fair value was estimated based on market quotations. 37. Earnings per share The earnings and weighted average number of ordinary shares used in calculation of earnings per share are as follows: Profi t for the year attributable to equity holders of the Parent Loss for the year from discontinued operations used in calculation of earnings per share from discontinued operations Earnings used in calculation of earnings per share from continuing operations 2010 2009 205,395 148,564 – 205,395 – 148,564 2008 1,518 9,722 11,240 Weighted average number of shares outstanding 109,411,408 110,770,000 106,738,750 During the year ended 31 December 2008 the results from discontinued operations were attributable to equity holders of the Parent. The Group has no dilutive potential ordinary shares; therefore, the diluted earnings per share equal basic earnings per share. Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 79 Overview Business review Management & Governance Financial Statements & Notes Other information 38. Supplemental cash fl ow information Operating, investing and fi nancing transactions that did not require the use of cash or cash equivalents were as follows in the years ended 31 December: Additions of property, plant and equipment under fi nance leases Additions of property, plant and equipment fi nanced through direct bank-lender payments to the vendor Property, plant and equipment purchased for credit 2010 2009 2008 16,365 3,970 4,396 22,118 4,489 6,340 47,616 16,313 8,116 39. Authorization of the consolidated fi nancial statements These consolidated fi nancial statements were authorised for issue by the Board of Directors of MHP S.A. on 25 March 2011. Myronivsky Hliboproduct / Annual Report 2010 80 Corporate information JSC Myronivsky Hliboproduct 158 Akademica Zabolotnogo Str, Kiev, 03143, Ukraine www.mhp.com.ua For further enquires: a.sobotyuk@mhp.com.ua +38 044 207 00 70 Registered Offi ce 5 rue Guillaume Kroll L-1822 Luxembourg Registered number: B116838