M/I Homes Annual Report 2005

← All annual reports

FY2005 Annual Report · M/I Homes

Loading PDF…

CELEBRATING 30 YEARS

2005 AN N UAL RE P ORT

M / I H O M E S P R O F I L E

CINCINNATI, OH

INDIANAPOLIS, IN

COLUMBUS, OH

CHARLOTTE, NC

WASHINGTON, D.C.

ORLANDO, FL

RALEIGH, NC

TAMPA, FL

WEST PALM BEACH, FL

Founded in 1976, M/I Homes is one of the nation’s leading homebuilders. The Company has delivered nearly 64,000 homes
under the M/I Homes and Showcase Homes trade names. During the past 30 years, M/I Homes has established an exemplary
reputation based on a strong commitment to superior service, innovative design, quality construction and premier locations.

M/I Homes serves a broad segment of the market including first-time, move-up, luxury and empty-nester buyers.
Listed on the New York Stock Exchange, the Company’s stock is traded under the ticker symbol MHO.

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2

S
E
M
O
H

I
/

2 0 0 5 H I G H L I G H T S

•

Record Revenue in 2005 - $1.3 billion

Record Net Income of $100.8 million

Record Diluted Earnings per Share of $6.93

Gross Margins of 25.2%

Year-end shareholder’s equity reaching a record high of nearly $600 million

New home orders totaled 4,314

Record year-end backlog of 2,807, with a record year-end backlog sales value of $954
million and a record average sales price of $340,000

Income Statement Data

Year Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

Revenue

Gross Margin

Operating Income

Income Before Income Taxes

Net Income

Net Income Per Share
(Diluted)

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

$1,347,646

1,174,635

$1,068,492

$1,032,025

$975,636

340,123

175,535

161,427

100,785

299,021

159,639

151,297

91,534

266,961

139,930

135,099

81,730

242,705

117,442

109,200

66,612

216,245

97,013

85,042

55,282

$6.93

$6.35

$5.51

$4.30

$3.56

Unit Data

Year Ended December 31, (dollars in thousands)

Revenue

(in thousands)

$1,300,000

1,200,000

1,100,000

1,000,000

900,000

2001

2002

2003

2004 2005

Net Income

(in thousands)

$110,000

100,000

90,000

80,000

70,000

60,000

New Contracts

Homes Delivered

Backlog at Year-End

2005

4,314

4,291

2,807

2004

4,333

4,303

2,688

2003

4,485

4,148

2,658

2002

4,130

4,140

2,321

2001

4,447

4,227

2,331

Backlog Sales Value

$954,000

$800,000

$704,000

$567,000

$559,000

Backlog Average Sales Price

$340

$298

$265

$244

$240

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

Shareholders’ Equity

(in thousands)

Balance Sheet Data

At December 31, (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

Homebuilding Inventory

$1,076,132

$798,486

$591,626

$451,217

$479,236

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

Total Assets

Homebuilding Debt

Shareholders’ Equity

Shareholders’ Equity
Per Share

1,329,678

465,565

592,568

978,526

287,370

487,611

746,872

155,614

402,409

578,458

62,658

339,729

612,110

164,227

279,891

$41.36

$34.37

$28.28

$22.97

$18.74

$600,000

550,000

500,000

450,000

400,000

350,000

300,000

/
I

H
O
M
E
S

2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

2001

2002

2003

2004 2005

TO O U R S H A R E H O L D E R S

2005 was a great year for M/I Homes. It was the tenth
consecutive record year for our Company with records
achieved in many areas, notably income, revenue and
backlog. We are pleased to share the highlights with you and
to review our outlook for 2006 and beyond.

Net income for 2005 reached a record $100.8
million, a 10% increase over the previous record
set in 2004. Revenue exceeded $1.3 billion and
surpassed 2004’s previous record level. For the
year, we delivered 4,291 homes and at year-end,
our backlog stood at 2,807 homes with an
aggregate sales value of $954 million, both
company records. The average sales price of
homes in backlog increased to a record $340,000,
a 14% increase compared to 2004’s $298,000.
Once again, our margins and profitability were
very solid with gross margins reaching 25.2% and
operating margins of 13.0%. For the year,
earnings per share increased 9% over 2004,
equaling $6.93 per share.

Our financial condition has never been stronger,
with year-end shareholders’ equity approaching
$600 million. During 2005, we significantly
strengthened our capital structure with the
issuance of $200 million of senior notes and the
increase of our bank line to $725 million – this
improvement in our capital structure is key to our
growth objectives. Our
financial
performance also resulted in M/I being named to
the S&P SmallCap 600 – an important milestone
for our Company.

strong

Land purchases for 2005 reached a record $320
million and, consistent with our previously
announced strategy to geographically reposition
the Company, our Florida, North Carolina and

Washington, D.C. markets accounted for over
80% of these purchases. We currently develop
approximately 90% of our lots and firmly believe
our expertise and skill in managing the land part
of the business is critical to our success. Land
development is one of our core competencies.
The creation and development of carefully-
planned, aesthetically designed communities
where people “want to live” is integral to, and
substantially enhances the marketing and sale of
our homes. At year-end we controlled more than
30,000 lots – the strongest, best located land
position in M/I’s history.

We operate in nine major markets in the eastern
half of the United States – with three in the
midwest (Columbus, Cincinnati and Indianapolis),
three in Florida (Tampa, Orlando and greater
Palm Beach County), and three in the mid-
Atlantic region (Charlotte, Raleigh and greater
Washington, D.C.). We have been in each of these
markets for a minimum of 15 years and feel good
about our geographic mix and diversity. While
much has been written about the recent economic
slowdown in the midwest, our markets in Florida,
North Carolina and greater Washington, D.C.
have been and continue to be among the premier
housing markets in the United States.

A prime element of our growth and operating
strategy has, for several years, been improving
and expanding our market position in our

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2

S
E
M
O
H

I
/

existing markets in Florida, North Carolina and
greater Washington, D.C. The
successful
implementation of this strategic objective was
clearly evident in 2005 where (i) in July, we
successfully completed the acquisition of Shamrock
Homes, a leading homebuilder in Lake County,
Florida, adjacent to the greater Orlando market, (ii)
we continued to diversify and strengthen our land
position in favor of our non-midwestern markets and
(iii) income from our Florida, North Carolina and
Washington, D.C. operations increased by nearly
60%. For 2006, we expect even stronger results from
our non-midwest markets – with income from
Florida, North Carolina and Washington, D.C.
operations projected to increase by more than 75%
and closings in Florida expected to reach nearly
2000 homes. While market conditions in the
midwest continue to be difficult, we believe the
strength of our other markets will, in 2006, once
again more than offset these challenges, as we look
to grow new orders and income by approximately
10% in each of 2006 and 2007. The continued
successful execution of our growth goals over the
next several years will result in a homes delivered
mix whereby approximately 40-45% of closings will
occur in our rapidly growing Florida markets, 30-
35% will be in our midwest markets and the
remaining 20-25% will be in North Carolina and
greater Washington, D.C. In addition, as a secondary
component of our growth strategy, we continue to
explore, on an opportunistic basis, the potential
acquisition of other homebuilding companies.

While achieving a high level of customer service and
delivering a quality product is vital to the success of
many businesses, it is, in our judgment, extremely
important in the homebuilding industry. Perhaps the
greatest vote of confidence we can receive is for our
homeowners to recommend us to potential buyers.
In 2005, over 95% of M/I homeowners stated that
they would recommend us to others. This marks the
fifteenth consecutive year in which we have achieved
a positive homeowner approval rating of 95% or
greater. We
this
achievement and know that it would not have been
possible without the commitment and effort of all of
our employees and associates.

tremendous pride

take

this opportunity

We also want
to
take
acknowledge and recognize the contribution made
to our Company by outgoing Board member Lewis
R. Smoot, Sr. Lewis has served with great
distinction as a member of our Board since 1993
and his guidance and counsel will be missed. With
his February 2006 announcement that he will not
stand for re-election, we are pleased to share with
you that the Board has nominated The Honorable
Yvette McGee Brown to join the Board. Yvette
enjoyed a distinguished career as a judge, has
received numerous honors for her public service
and community involvement and currently serves
as President of the Center for Child and Family
Advocacy at Columbus Children’s Hospital. Yvette
will stand for election at the annual meeting.

This is a very exciting time for M/I Homes. Given
the strength of our land position, our strong financial
condition, the strength and geographic diversity of
our nine markets, and the dedication of the entire
M/I Homes team, we are firmly positioned to
achieve our growth goals. We look forward to
building on our record of homebuilding excellence
and making 2006 our eleventh consecutive record
year. Thank you for your support.

February 28, 2006

Steven Schottenstein
Chief Operating Officer

Robert H. Schottenstein
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

/
I

H
O
M
E
S

2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

C R E AT I N G C O M M U N I T I E S

The creation and development of carefully-planned, aesthetically
designed communities where people want to live is integral to, and
substantially enhances the marketing and sale of our homes.

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2

S
E
M
O
H

I
/

/
I

H
O
M
E
S

2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

OU R COM M ITM E NT TO OU R HOM E B UYE RS

While other builders may offer similar home styles or build in
neighboring locations, our personal pride, dedication to superior
craftsmanship and commitment to homeowner service are
uniquely our own.

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2

S
E
M
O
H

I
/

/
I

H
O
M
E
S

2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2

S
E
M
O
H

I
/

M
M

/
/
I
I

H
H
O
O
M
M
E
E
S
S

2
2
0
0
0
0
5
5
A
A
N
N
N
N
U
U
A
A
L
L
R
R
E
E
P
P
O
O
R
R
T
T

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2

S
E
M
O
H

I
/

Q UA L I T Y A N D S E RV I C E

In 2005 over 95% of our homeowners stated that they would
recommend M/I to others. This marks the fifteenth consecutive
year in which we have achieved a positive homeowner approval
rating of 95% or greater.

/
I

H
O
M
E
S

2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

L A N D A C Q U I S I T I O N

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2

S
E
M
O
H

I
/

One of the factors critical to our continued
success is our approach to land. In 2005,
we continued to diversify our
land
position by investing in the higher growth
markets of Florida, North Carolina and
Washington, D.C.

/
I

H
O
M
E
S

2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

2 0 0 6 A N D B E YO N D

Given the strength of our land position, our strong financial condition,
the strength and geographic diversity of our nine markets, and the
dedication of the entire M/I Homes team, we are firmly positioned to
make 2006 our eleventh consecutive record year.

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2

S
E
M
O
H

I
/

/
I

H
O
M
E
S

2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2

S
E
M
O
H

I
/

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______ to ______

Commission File No. 1-12434

M/I HOMES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Ohio
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation or organization)

31-1210837
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)

3 Easton Oval, Suite 500, Columbus, Ohio 43219
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (614) 418-8000

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:

Title of each class

Common Shares, par value $.01

Name of each exchange on
which registered
New York Stock Exchange

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:

None
(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act.
Yes . No X .

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act.
Yes . No X .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes X . No___.

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained
herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements
incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X]

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated
filer. See definition of “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check
one.):
Large accelerated filer . Accelerated filer X . Non-accelerated filer .

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes . No X .

As of June 30, 2005, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the
aggregate market value of voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant (12,522,362 shares) was
approximately $677,460,000. The number of shares of common stock of the registrant outstanding on February 17,
2006 was 14,127,887.

Portions of the registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement for the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders filed pursuant
to Regulation 14A are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.

DOCUMENT INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PAGE
NUMBERS

Part I

Item 1. Business

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

Item 2. Properties

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

Part II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters and
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Item 9B. Other Information

Part III

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Part IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

Signatures

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Company

PART I

M/I Homes, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company” or “we”) is one of the nation’s leading builders of single-family
homes, having delivered more than 64,000 homes since our inception. In 2004, the latest year for which information
is available, we were the 20th largest U.S. single-family homebuilder (based on homes delivered) as ranked by
Builder Magazine. The Company was incorporated, through predecessor entities, in 1973 and commenced
homebuilding activities in 1976. During 2005, the Company acquired certain assets and assumed certain liabilities
of Shamrock Homes (“Shamrock”), located in Tavares, Florida. We sell and construct single-family homes and
townhomes to the first-time, move-up, empty-nester and luxury buyers under the M/I Homes, Showcase Homes and
Shamrock Homes trade names. In 2005, our average sales price of homes delivered was $298,000 compared to
$267,000 in 2004. During the year ended December 31, 2005, we delivered 4,291 homes and earned record-setting
revenues and net income of $1.3 billion and $100.8 million, respectively.

Our homes are sold in nine geographic markets - Columbus and Cincinnati, Ohio; Tampa, Orlando and West Palm
Beach, Florida; Charlotte and Raleigh, North Carolina; Indianapolis, Indiana; Delaware; and the Virginia and
Maryland suburbs of Washington, D.C. We are the leading homebuilder in the Columbus, Ohio market, based on
revenue, and have been the number one builder of single-family detached homes in this market for each of the last
seventeen years. In addition, we are one of the top ten homebuilders in the Indianapolis, Cincinnati and Tampa
markets, based on homes delivered. Our growth strategy primarily targets increasing our market position in the
markets in which we currently operate, particularly within our Florida, North Carolina and Washington, D.C.
markets. With respect to geographical diversification, we have historically expanded into new markets by opening
new divisions rather than through acquisitions.

We believe that we distinguish ourselves from competitors by offering homes in select areas with a high level of
design and construction quality within a given price range, and by providing superior customer service. Offering
homes at a variety of price points allows us to attract a wide range of buyers, including many existing M/I
homeowners. We support our homebuilding operations by providing mortgage financing services through our
wholly-owned subsidiary, M/I Financial Corp. (“M/I Financial”), and title and insurance brokerage services through
affiliated entities.

Our financial reporting segments consist of homebuilding and financial services. Our homebuilding operations
comprise the most substantial part of our business, representing approximately 98% of consolidated revenue during
each of the past three years. The homebuilding segment generates approximately 98% of its revenue from the sale
of completed homes, with the remaining amount generated from the sale of land and lots. The financial services
segment generates its revenue from originating and selling mortgages and collecting fees for title insurance and
closing services. In addition, in 2006 the financial services segment will be collecting commissions as a broker of
property and casualty insurance policies. Financial information, including revenue, pre-tax income and identifiable
assets for each of our reporting segments is included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.

Our business strategy emphasizes the following:

Maintain or increase market position in existing markets. We believe there are significant opportunities to
profitably expand in most of our existing markets. While our primary growth strategy will focus on increasing our
market position in these markets, we may, on an opportunistic basis, explore expansion into new markets through
organic growth or acquisition. Our goal continues to be 15% growth in annual new contracts.

Premier locations and land development. For a number of years, our approach to location of communities and land
development has been a key strategic element of our business. We focus on locating and controlling land in the
most desirable areas of our markets, and during 2004 and 2005 we have also specifically focused on geographic
diversification. In 2005, more than 80% of our land purchases were in markets outside the Midwest, and as of
December 31, 2005, approximately 70% of our backlog was in markets outside the Midwest. We currently own a
three- to four-year supply of land based on our planned growth. In addition we also control an additional supply of
land under land option agreements. We develop a majority of the lots upon which our homes are built, with the
percentage of internally developed lots being approximately 90% during each of the last three years. We believe our
expertise in land development and planning enables us to create desirable new communities and gives us a
competitive advantage in operating attractive locations at competitive costs. At December 31, 2005, we owned

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

19,374 lots, including our interest in lots held by unconsolidated limited liability companies (“LLCs”), and
controlled an additional 11,200 lots pursuant to land option agreements.

Provide superior homeowner service. Our core operating philosophy is to provide superior service to our
homeowners. We attempt to involve the homeowner in many phases of the building process in order to enhance
communication, knowledge and involvement. Our selling process focuses on the homes’ features, benefits, quality
and design, as opposed to merely price and square footage. In certain markets, we utilize design centers to better
promote the sale of options and enable buyers to make more informed choices. This enhances the selling process
and increases the sale of optional features that typically carry higher margins. We believe all of this leads to a more
satisfied homeowner, and based on the responses to our customer questionnaire, for the fifteenth year in a row, more
than 95% of our homeowners would recommend us to a potential buyer.

Focus on profitability. We focus on improving profitability while maintaining the high quality of our homes and
customer service. We focus on margins by carefully managing the selling process, in order to emphasize the
features, benefits, quality and design of our homes. In addition, profitability is enhanced by managing expenses and
by minimizing speculative building. We also value-engineer our homes by working with our subcontractors and
suppliers to provide attractive features while minimizing raw material and construction costs.

Product diversity and innovative design. We devote significant resources to the research and design of our homes
to better meet the needs of our buyers. We offer a number of distinct product lines and more than 700 different floor
plans and elevations. We also offer a high level of design and construction quality within each of our price ranges.

Decentralized operations with experienced management. Each of our markets has unique characteristics and is
managed locally by dedicated, on-site personnel. Our area and division presidents possess intimate knowledge of
their particular markets and are encouraged to be entrepreneurial to best meet the needs of that market. Our
incentive compensation structure supports our overall Company goals by rewarding each region, area and division
president based on income targets and homeowner satisfaction.

Sales and Marketing

Throughout our geographic markets, we market and sell our homes exclusively under the M/I Homes trade name,
except in Columbus, where a limited number of our homes are also marketed under the Showcase Homes trade
name, and in our recently acquired homebuilding operations in Tavares, Florida (included in our Orlando market),
where our homes are also marketed under the Shamrock Homes trade name. Company-employed sales personnel
conduct home sales from on-site offices within our furnished model homes. Each sales consultant is trained and
prepared to fully explain the features and benefits of our homes, to determine which home best suits each buyer’s
needs, to explain the construction process and to assist the buyer in choosing the best financing. Significant
attention is given to the ongoing training of all sales personnel to assure the highest level of professionalism and
product knowledge. As of December 31, 2005, we employed 132 sales consultants and operated 153 model homes.

We advertise using most of the traditional mediums, such as newspapers, magazines, direct mail, billboards, radio
and television. The particular marketing mediums used differ from market to market based on area demographics
and other competitive factors. We have also significantly increased our advertising on the internet through
expansion of our website at mihomes.com and through a third party’s website. In addition, we encourage
independent broker participation and, from time to time, utilize promotions and incentives to attract interest from
these brokers. Our commitment to quality design and construction, along with our reputation for superior service,
has resulted in a strong referral base and numerous repeat buyers.

To further enhance the selling process, we operate design centers in each of our Midwest and Florida markets.
These design centers are staffed with interior design specialists who assist buyers in selecting interior and exterior
colors, standard options and upgrades. In our other markets, this selection process is handled directly by our sales
consultants. During 2006, we expect to open design centers in our North Carolina markets. We also add to the
selling process by offering financing to our customers through our wholly-owned subsidiary, M/I Financial, which
has branches in all of our markets except Washington, D.C. M/I Financial originates loans for purchasers of our
homes. The loans are then sold, along with the servicing rights, to outside mortgage lenders. Title-related services
are provided to purchasers of our homes in the majority of our markets through affiliated entities. In addition, in
2006, the financial services segment will be collecting commissions as a broker of property and casualty insurance
policies through a newly formed majority-owned subsidiary, M/I Insurance Agency, LLC.

We generally do not commence construction of a home until we obtain a sales contract and preliminary oral advice
from the buyer’s lender that financing should be approved. However, in certain markets, contracts may be accepted

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

contingent upon the sale of an existing home, and construction may be authorized through a certain phase prior to
satisfaction of that contingency. In addition, a limited, controlled number of speculative, or “spec”, homes (i.e.,
homes started in the absence of an executed contract) may be built to facilitate delivery of homes on an immediate-
need basis and to provide presentation of new products.

Design and Construction

We devote significant resources to the research, design and development of our homes in order to fulfill the needs of
homebuyers in all of our markets. Experienced and qualified in-house professionals design virtually all of our floor
plans and elevations. We offer approximately 700 different floor plans and elevations that are tailored to meet the
requirements of each of our markets. We spent $3.5 million, $2.5 million and $1.6 million in the years ended
December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, for research and development of our homes.

The construction of each home is supervised by a construction supervisor who reports to a production manager, both
of whom are employees of the Company. Buyers are introduced to their construction supervisor prior to
commencement of home construction at a pre-construction “buyer/builder conference.” The purpose of this
conference is to review the home plans and all relevant construction details to explain the construction process and
schedule. We encourage our buyers to actively monitor and observe the construction of their home and see the
quality being built into their home. All of this is part of our exclusive “confidence builder program” which,
consistent with our business philosophy, is designed to “put the buyer first” and enhance the total home-buying
experience.

Homes generally are constructed according to standardized designs and meet applicable Federal Housing Authority
(“FHA”) and Veterans Administration (“VA”) requirements. To allow maximum design flexibility, we limit the use
of pre-assembled building components. The efficiency of the building process is enhanced through the use of
standardized materials available from a variety of sources. We utilize independent subcontractors for the installation
of site improvements and the construction of our homes. Our on-site construction supervisors manage the
development and construction process. Subcontractor work is performed pursuant to written agreements. The
agreements are generally short-term, with terms from six to twelve months, and specify a fixed price for labor and
materials. The agreements are structured to provide price protection for a majority of the higher-cost phases of
construction for homes in our backlog. The construction of our homes typically takes approximately four to six
months from the start of the home to completion, depending on the size and complexity of the particular home being
built. As of December 31, 2005, we had a total of 2,807 homes with $954.0 million aggregate sales value in backlog
in various stages of completion, including homes that are under contract but for which construction has not yet
begun. As of December 31, 2004, we had a total of 2,688 homes with $800.0 million aggregate sales value in
backlog. Homes included in year-end backlog are typically included in homes delivered in the subsequent year.

Warranty

We provide a variety of warranties in connection with our homes and have a program to perform several inspections
on each home that we sell. Immediately prior to closing and again approximately three months after a home is
delivered, we inspect each home with the buyer. At the homeowner’s request, we will also provide a one-year
drywall inspection. We offer a two-year limited warranty on materials and workmanship and a thirty-year limited
warranty against major structural defects. To increase the value of the thirty-year warranty, the warranty is
transferable in the event of the sale of the home. We also pass along all warranties provided by the manufacturers or
suppliers of components installed in each home. Our warranty expense was approximately 0.9%, 1.3% and 1.1% of
total housing revenue for each of the years ended December 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Markets

Our operations are organized into eleven homebuilding divisions to maximize operating efficiencies and use of local
management. Each of our divisions is managed by an area president. Our current divisional operating structure is as
follows:

Division
Columbus, Ohio - M/I
Columbus, Ohio - Showcase
Columbus, Ohio – Horizon (a)
Cincinnati, Ohio
Indianapolis, Indiana

Year
Operations
Commenced
1976
1988
1994
1988
1988

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

Tampa, Florida
Orlando, Florida (b)
West Palm Beach, Florida
Charlotte, North Carolina
Raleigh, North Carolina
Washington, D.C. (c)

1981
1984
1984
1985
1986
1991

(a) Effective January 1, 2006, our Horizon division has been combined with our Columbus – M/I division.
(b) Orlando division includes the Shamrock homebuilding operations located in Tavares, Florida, acquired July 1, 2005.
(c) During 2005, we expanded our Washington, D.C. operations into Delaware.

Columbus is the capital of Ohio, with federal, state and local governments providing significant employment.
Single-family permits were approximately 8,900 in 2005, a decline of 20% from 2004’s permits of nearly 11,100.
The decline in permits is attributable to general economic conditions, including minimal job growth and increased
competition from the resale market. Columbus is our home market, where we have had operations since 1976.

Cincinnati is characterized by a stable economic environment and a diverse employment base. Employers include
Proctor & Gamble, Kroger, the University of Cincinnati and General Electric. In addition, Cincinnati has a large
presence in the financial services industry. Single-family permits were approximately 10,800 in both 2005 and
2004.

Indianapolis is a market noted for its diverse industrial and relatively young population. Significant industries
include health and pharmaceutical, distribution and services. Single-family permits were approximately 12,400 in
both 2005 and 2004.

Tampa’s housing market is strong, anchored by financial and other back-office operations, tourism and conventions.
In-migration remains steady as a result of on-going business expansions and relocations. Single-family housing
permits reached over 27,000 in 2005 compared to approximately 23,000 in 2004.

Orlando’s housing market continues to be strong and offers growth potential. Predominant industries include
tourism, high-tech and manufacturing. In 2005 single-family permits were down slightly, at 26,500 compared to
nearly 27,500 in 2004.

West Palm Beach is one of the more affluent markets in the United States. Predominant industries include
construction, retail, tourism, healthcare and service sectors. Housing activity declined slightly in 2005, with nearly
9,700 single-family permits compared to 10,300 permits in 2004.

Charlotte is home to firms in the banking industry, as well as a growing presence of corporate headquarters and the
addition of some new manufacturing operations. The demographics continue to support long-term growth, with
strong in-migration and an educated workforce. In 2005, housing activity increased with over 19,300 single-family
permits compared to approximately 17,600 in 2004.

The Raleigh market is becoming stronger with state government, three major universities, and growth in the
pharmaceutical and biotech industries contributing to its significant and stable employment base. Housing activity
increased in 2005, with over 19,200 single-family permits compared to 17,100 in 2004.

The Washington, D.C. metro economy continues to be favorable with some recent softness noted. Major
contributors to employment come from the construction, technology and government sectors. Housing activity
continues to be relatively stable, with over 36,100 single-family permits issued in 2005, which was a slight decline
from the 36,700 permits issued in 2004. Our operations are located throughout the Maryland and Virginia suburbs
of Washington, D.C., and we recently expanded our operations into Delaware.

Product Lines

On a regional basis, we offer homes ranging in base sales price from approximately $100,000 to $1,000,000 and
ranging in square footage from approximately 1,200 to 7,000 square feet. In addition to single-family detached
homes, we also offer attached townhomes in all of our markets except Charlotte and Orlando, where we anticipate
we will begin offering townhomes during 2006. In addition, we will also be offering condominiums in certain of
our markets in 2006. By offering a wide range of homes, we are able to attract first-time, move-up, empty-nester
and luxury homebuyers. It is our goal to sell more than one home to our buyers, and we have been successful in this
pursuit.

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

In each of our home lines, upgrades and options are available to the homebuyer for an additional charge. Major
options include fireplaces, additional bathrooms and higher quality flooring, cabinets and appliances. The options
are typically more numerous and significant on more expensive homes, and typically options carry a higher margin
than our standard selections.

Land Acquisition and Development

Our land development activities and land holdings have increased significantly during the past few years to support
our growth strategy and to provide greater market diversification. During 2005, we spent approximately $320
million on land purchases, with more than 80% of these land purchases being made in markets outside the Midwest.
We develop approximately 90% of our land internally because we believe it is prudent to do so in order to maximize
our ability to secure the best locations. On a limited basis, we also purchase finished lots from outside developers
under option agreements; however, we constantly evaluate our alternatives to satisfy the need for lots in the most
cost effective manner. We seek to limit our investment in undeveloped land and lots to the amount reasonably
expected to be sold in the next three to six years. Although we purchase land and engage in land development
activities primarily for the purpose of furthering our homebuilding activities, we have, on a very select and limited
basis, developed land with the intention of selling a portion of the lots to outside homebuilders in certain markets.

To limit the risk involved in the development of land, we acquire land primarily through the use of contingent
purchase agreements. These agreements require the approval of our corporate land committee and frequently
condition our obligation to purchase land upon approval of zoning, utilities, soil and subsurface conditions,
environmental and wetland conditions, market analysis, development costs, title matters and other property-related
criteria. Only after this thorough evaluation has been completed do we make a commitment to purchase
undeveloped land. In certain limited situations, we have acquired unzoned land, as approved by our corporate land
committee.

We periodically enter into limited liability company (“LLC”) arrangements with other entities to develop land. At
December 31, 2005, we had interests varying from 33% to 50% in each of 26 LLCs. Three of the LLCs are located
in Tampa, Florida, one of the LLCs is located in Orlando, Florida and the remaining LLCs are located in Columbus,
Ohio. As of December 31, 2005, two of the LLCs have obtained financing from a third party lender, and all of the
remaining LLCs are equity financed by the Company and our partners in the LLCs.

During the development of lots, we are required by some municipalities and other governmental authorities to
provide completion bonds or letters of credit for sewer, streets and other improvements. At December 31, 2005,
$114.2 million of completion bonds were outstanding for these purposes, as well as $25.1 million of letters of credit.

We seek to balance the economic risk of owning lots and land with the necessity of having lots available for our
homes. At December 31, 2005, we had 3,879 developed lots and 2,537 lots under development in inventory. We
also owned raw land expected to be developed into approximately 10,259 lots.

In addition, at December 31, 2005, our interest in lots held by unconsolidated LLCs consisted of 578 lots under
development and raw land expected to be developed into 2,121 lots.

At December 31, 2005, we had purchase agreements to acquire 3,344 developed lots and raw land to be developed
into approximately 7,856 lots for a total of 11,200 lots, with an aggregate current purchase price of approximately
$452.6 million. Purchase of these properties is generally contingent upon satisfaction of certain requirements by us
and the sellers, such as zoning approval and availability of building permits. We currently believe that our maximum
exposure as of December 31, 2005 related to these agreements to be the amount of our outstanding deposits, which
totaled $31.2 million, including cash deposits of $14.1 million, letters of credit of $13.8 million and corporate
promissory notes of $3.3 million. Further details relating to our land option agreements are included in Note 9 of
our Consolidated Financial Statements.

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

The following table sets forth our land position in lots (including lots held in unconsolidated LLCs) at December 31,
2005:

Lots Owned

Region
Ohio and Indiana

Finished
Lots
2,870

Lots Under
Development
756

Florida

483

2,026

North Carolina, Delaware
and Washington, D.C.

Total

Financial Services

526

3,879

333

3,115

Undeveloped

Lots
5,117

5,359

1,904

12,380

Total Lots
Owned
8,743

Lots Under
Contract
4,199

Total

12,942

7,868

4,014

11,882

2,763

19,374

2,987

11,200

5,750

30,574

We provide mortgage financing services to purchasers of our homes through our wholly-owned subsidiary, M/I
Financial. M/I Financial provides financing services in all of our housing markets except Washington, D.C. During
the year ended December 31, 2005, in the markets served, we captured 84% of the available business from
purchasers of our homes, originating approximately $666.7 million of mortgage loans. The mortgage loans
originated by M/I Financial are generally sold to a third party within two weeks of originating the loan.

M/I Financial has been approved by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) and the VA to
originate mortgages that are insured and/or guaranteed by these entities. In addition, M/I Financial has been
approved by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“FHLMC”) and by the Federal National Mortgage
Association (“FNMA”) as a seller and servicer of mortgages.

We also provide title services to purchasers of our homes through our wholly-owned subsidiary, TransOhio
Residential Title Agency, Ltd. and
through majority-owned subsidiaries, M/I Title Agency, Ltd. and
Washington/Metro Residential Title Agency, LLC. Additionally, we have a joint venture in Columbus that provides
title services for certain land transactions. Through these entities, we serve as a title insurance agent by providing
title insurance policies, examination and closing services to purchasers of our homes in all of our housing markets
except Raleigh and Charlotte. We assume no underwriting risk associated with the title policies. In addition, in late
2005 we formed M/I Insurance Agency, LLC, a majority-owned subsidiary that will collect commissions as a broker
of property and casualty insurance policies. As a broker, the Company will not retain any risk associated with these
insurance policies.

Corporate Operations

Our corporate operations and home office are located in Columbus, Ohio, where we perform the following functions
at a centralized level:

● Establish operating policies;
● Monitor and manage the growth, strategies and performance of our operating divisions;
● Allocate capital resources;
● Perform all cash management functions for the Company as well as maintain our relationship with lenders;
● Maintain centralized information and communication systems; and
● Maintain centralized financial reporting and internal audit function.

Competition

The homebuilding industry is highly competitive. In each of our markets, we compete with numerous national,
regional and local homebuilders, some of which have greater financial, marketing, land acquisition and sales
resources. Builders of new homes compete not only for homebuyers, but also for desirable properties, financing,
raw materials and skilled subcontractors. In addition, there is competition with the existing home resale market. We
believe that we have a very strong competitive position in the markets in which we operate because of our
commitment to both quality and customer service.

Regulation and Environmental Matters

The homebuilding industry, including the Company, is subject to various local, state and federal (including FHA and
VA) statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning zoning, building, design, construction, sales and similar

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

matters. These regulations affect construction activities, including types of construction materials that may be used,
certain aspects of building design, sales activities and dealings with consumers. We are required to obtain licenses,
permits and approvals from various governmental authorities for development activities. In many areas, we are
subject to local regulations which impose restrictive zoning and density requirements in order to limit the number of
homes within the boundaries of a particular locality. We strive to reduce the risks of restrictive zoning and density
requirements by using contingent land purchase agreements, which state that land must meet various requirements,
including zoning, prior to our purchase.

Development may be subject to periodic delays or precluded entirely due to building moratoriums. Generally, these
moratoriums relate to insufficient water or sewage facilities or inadequate road capacity within specific market areas
or communities. The moratoriums we have experienced have not been of long duration and have not had a material
effect on our business.

Each of the states in which we operate has a wide variety of environmental protection laws. These laws generally
regulate developments which are of substantial size and which are in or near certain specified geographic areas.
Furthermore, these laws impose requirements for development approvals which are more stringent than those that
land developers would have to meet outside of these geographic areas.

Additional requirements may be imposed on homebuilders and developers in the future, which could have a
significant impact on us and the industry. Although we cannot predict the effect, such requirements could result in
time-consuming and expensive compliance programs. In addition, the continued effectiveness of current licenses,
permits or development approvals is dependent upon many factors, some of which may be beyond our control.

Seasonality

Our homebuilding operations experience significant seasonality and quarter-to-quarter variability in homebuilding
activity levels. In general, homes delivered increase substantially in the second half of the year. We believe that
this seasonality reflects the tendency of homebuyers to shop for a new home in the spring with the goal of closing in
the fall or winter, as well as the scheduling of construction to accommodate seasonal weather conditions. Our
financial services operations also experience seasonality because loan originations correspond with the delivery of
homes in our homebuilding operations.

Employees

At December 31, 2005, we employed 1,118 people (including part-time employees), of which 285 were employed in
sales, 459 in construction and 374 in management, administrative and clerical positions. We consider our employee
relations to be very good. No employees are represented by a collective bargaining agreement.

Available Information

We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). These filings are available to the public over the internet on the SEC’s website
at www.sec.gov. Our periodic reports and other information filed with the SEC may be inspected without charge at
the public reference section of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. You can also
obtain copies of filed documents by mail from the public reference section of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Room
1580, Washington, D.C. 20549 at prescribed rates. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information
on the public reference facilities.

Our principal internet address is mihomes.com. We make available free of charge on or through our website our
annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K that are furnished or
filed, and amendments to those reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material
with, or furnish it to, the SEC. The contents of our website are not part of this report.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Factors That May Affect Our Future Results (Cautionary Statements Under the Private Securities Litigation
Reform Act of 1995):

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

statements regarding our future financial performance and financial condition. Words such as “expects,”
“anticipates,” “targets,” “goals,” “projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” variations of such
words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements involve a
number of risks and uncertainties. Any forward-looking statements that we make herein and in future reports and
statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results may differ materially from those in such
forward-looking statements as a result of various factors relating to the economic environment, interest rates,
availability of resources, competition, market concentration, land development activities and various governmental
rules and regulations, as more fully discussed in this Risk Factors section. We undertake no obligation to publicly
update any forward-looking statements or risk factors, whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise. However, any further disclosures made on related subjects in our subsequent reports on Forms 10-K, 10-
Q and 8-K should be consulted. This discussion is provided as permitted by the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995 and as required by the rules and regulations of the SEC, and all of our forward-looking statements are
expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referenced in this section.

The following cautionary discussion of risks, uncertainties and possible inaccurate assumptions relevant to our
business includes factors we believe could cause our actual results to differ materially from expected and historical
results. Other factors beyond those listed below, including factors unknown to us and factors known to us which we
have not currently determined to be material, could also adversely affect us.

General Real Estate, Economic and Other Conditions Could Adversely Affect Our Business. The homebuilding
industry is significantly affected by changes in national and local economic and other conditions. Many of these
conditions are beyond our control. These conditions include employment levels, changing demographics, availability
of financing, consumer confidence and housing demand. In addition, homebuilders are subject to risks related to
competitive overbuilding, availability and cost of building lots, availability of materials and labor, adverse weather
conditions which can cause delays in construction schedules, cost overruns, changes in governmental regulations and
increases in real estate taxes and other local government fees. During the second half of 2004 and the first nine months
of 2005, we experienced certain delays caused by weather conditions and delays in regulatory processes in certain
markets that had an impact on the number of new contracts and homes delivered during 2005. In addition, during
2004 and 2005, our Midwest markets were impacted by softness in the local economy which have impacted, and are
expected to continue to impact, housing demand in these markets. As a result of these economic conditions, we are
offering certain sales incentives, which will reduce our gross margins on homes delivered in these markets in 2006.

Availability and Affordability of Residential Mortgage Financing Could Adversely Affect Our Business. Our
business is significantly affected by the impact of interest rates. Higher interest rates may decrease our potential market
by making it more difficult for homebuyers to qualify for mortgages or to obtain mortgages at interest rates that are
acceptable to them. Mortgage rates are currently close to historically low levels. If mortgage interest rates increase, or
experience substantial volatility, our business could be adversely affected.

The Occurrence of Natural Disasters Could Adversely Affect Our Business. Several of our growth markets,
specifically our operations in Florida and North Carolina, are situated in geographical areas that are regularly impacted
by severe storms, hurricanes and flooding. The occurrence of these or other natural disasters can cause delays in the
completion of, or increase the cost of, developing one or more of our communities, and as a result could adversely
impact our results of operations.

Material and Labor Shortages Could Adversely Affect Our Business. The residential construction industry has,
from time to time, experienced significant material and labor shortages in insulation, drywall, brick, cement and
certain areas of carpentry and framing, as well as fluctuations in lumber prices and supplies. Any shortages of long
duration in these areas could delay construction of homes, which could adversely affect our business. During 2005,
we experienced material and labor shortages in our Florida markets due to the recent homebuilding growth and the
hurricane rebuilding efforts impacting those markets, which has slightly lengthened the house production process;
however, we do not anticipate a material effect for the year 2006.

Our Future Growth May Require Additional Capital, Which May be Unavailable. Our operations require a
significant amount of cash because of the length of time from when we acquire land or lots to when we complete
construction of the related homes and deliver those homes to our homebuyers. We may be required to seek additional
capital, whether from sales of equity or debt or additional bank borrowings, to fund the future growth of our business.
The ability for us to secure the needed capital to fund our future growth at terms that are acceptable to us may be
impacted by factors beyond our control.

Our Business is Dependent on the Availability of Land and Lots that Meet Our Land Investment Criteria. The
continued availability of undeveloped land and developed or partially developed lots that meet our land acquisition

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

criteria depends on a number of factors outside our control, including general land availability, competition with other
homebuilders and land buyers for desirable property, inflation in land prices and regulatory requirements, such as
zoning and allowable density. In the event that we are unable to acquire suitable land or the cost of land substantially
increases, the number of homes that we can deliver or the margins on those homes may decline and adversely impact
our results of operations.

We Commit Significant Resources to Land Development Activities Which Involve Significant Risks. We develop the
lots for a majority of our communities. Therefore, our short-term and long-term financial success will be dependent
upon our ability to develop these communities successfully. Acquiring land and committing the financial and
managerial resources to develop a subdivision involves significant risks. Before a community generates any revenue,
we may make material expenditures for items such as acquiring land and constructing infrastructure (roads and
utilities).

Competition in Our Industry Could Adversely Affect Our Business. The homebuilding industry is highly
competitive. We compete in each of our local markets with numerous national, regional and local homebuilders,
some of which have greater financial, marketing, land acquisition, and sales resources than we do. Builders of new
homes compete not only for homebuyers, but also for desirable properties, financing, raw materials and skilled
subcontractors. We also compete with the existing home resale market that provides certain attractions for
homebuyers over the new home market. In addition, the mortgage financing industry is very competitive. M/I
Financial competes with outside lenders for the capture of our homebuyers. Competition typically increases during
periods in which there is a decline in the refinance activity within the industry. During 2004 and 2005, M/I
Financial experienced a slight decline in its capture rate due to competitive pressure, which could continue in 2006
and could negatively impact the results of M/I Financial.

Governmental Regulation and Environmental Considerations Could Adversely Affect Our Business. The
homebuilding industry is subject to increasing local, state and federal statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations
concerning zoning, resource protection, building design and construction, and similar matters. This includes local
regulations that impose restrictive zoning and density requirements in order to limit the number of homes that can
eventually be built within the boundaries of a particular location. Such regulation also affects construction
activities, including construction materials that must be used in certain aspects of building design, as well as sales
activities and other dealings with homebuyers. We must also obtain licenses, permits and approvals from various
governmental agencies for our development activities, the granting of which are beyond our control. Furthermore,
increasingly stringent requirements may be imposed on homebuilders and developers in the future. Although we
cannot predict the impact on us to comply with any such requirements, such requirements could result in time-
consuming and expensive compliance programs. In addition, we have been, and in the future may be, subject to
periodic delays or may be precluded from developing certain projects due to building moratoriums. These
moratoriums generally relate to insufficient water supplies or sewage facilities, delays in utility hookups or
inadequate road capacity within the specific market area or subdivision. These moratoriums can occur prior to, or
subsequent to, commencement of our operations, without notice or recourse.

We are also subject to a variety of local, state and federal statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning the
protection of health and the environment. The particular environmental laws that apply to any given project vary
greatly according to the project site and the present and former uses of the property. These environmental laws may
result in delays, cause us to incur substantial compliance costs (including substantial expenditures for pollution and
water quality control) and prohibit or severely restrict development in certain environmentally sensitive regions.
Although there can be no assurance that we will be successful in all cases, we have a general practice of requiring
resolution of environmental issues prior to purchasing land in an effort to avoid major environmental issues in our
developments.

In addition to the laws and regulations that relate to our homebuilding operations, M/I Financial is subject to a
variety of laws and regulations concerning the underwriting, servicing and sale of mortgage loans.

We are Dependent on the Services of Certain Key Employees. Our future success depends, in part, on our ability to
attract, train and retain skilled personnel. If we are unable to retain our key employees or attract, train and retain
other skilled personnel in the future, it could impact our growth strategy and result in additional expenses of
identifying and training new personnel. Competition for qualified personnel is intense in many of our markets.

We Are Dependent on a Limited Number of Markets. We have operations in Columbus and Cincinnati, Ohio;
Indianapolis, Indiana; Tampa, Orlando and West Palm Beach, Florida; Charlotte and Raleigh, North Carolina;
Delaware; and the Virginia and Maryland suburbs of Washington, D.C. Adverse general economic conditions in
these markets could have a material impact on our operations. For the year ended December 31, 2005,

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

approximately 33% of our operating income was derived from operations in the Columbus market. In 2006, we
anticipate that a significant portion of our operating income will be derived from our Florida markets.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

We own and operate an approximately 85,000 square foot office building for our home office in Columbus, Ohio
and lease all of our other offices.

Due to the nature of our business, a substantial amount of property is held as inventory in the ordinary course of
business. See “ITEM 1. BUSINESS – Land Acquisition and Development.”

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are involved in routine litigation incidental to our business. Management does not believe any of this litigation
is material to our business or our consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

During the fourth quarter of the 2005 fiscal year, no matters were submitted to a vote of security holders.

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS

AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

The Company’s common shares are traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “MHO.” As of
February 17, 2006, there were approximately 411 record holders of the Company’s common stock. At that time
there were 17,626,123 shares issued and 14,127,887 shares outstanding. The table below presents the highest and
lowest prices for the Company’s common stock during each of the quarters presented:

2005

First quarter
Second quarter
Third quarter
Fourth quarter

2004

First quarter
Second quarter
Third quarter
Fourth quarter

HIGH
$ 59.49
54.76
61.45
54.86

$ 48.08
47.74
42.93
55.41

LOW
$ 48.10
43.12
51.91
39.93

$ 35.92
38.45
35.86
37.99

The highest and lowest prices for the Company’s common shares from January 1, 2006 through February 17, 2006
were $46.70 and $35.00.

The Company typically declares dividends on a quarterly basis, as approved by the Board of Directors. Dividends
paid totaled $1.4 million in each of the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004. On November 8, 2005 and
February 13, 2006, the Board of Directors approved a $0.025 per share cash dividend payable to shareholders of
record of its common shares on January 3 and April 3, 2006, payable on January 19, 2006 and April 20, 2006,
respectively. The Company is required under its revolving credit agreement to maintain a certain amount of tangible
net worth, and as of December 31, 2005, had approximately $155.0 million available for payment of dividends.

On November 8, 2005, the Company obtained authorization from the Board of Directors repurchase up to $25
million worth of its outstanding common shares. The repurchase program has no expiration date, and was publicly
announced on November 10, 2005. The purchases may occur in the open market and/or in privately negotiated
transactions as market conditions warrant. This authorization supersedes all prior repurchase programs, including
the $14.6 million that was remaining under the December 10, 2002 Board-approved repurchase program. During the
three-month period ended December 31, 2005, the Company repurchased 9,800 shares. As of December 31, 2005, the
Company had approximately $24.6 million available to repurchase outstanding common shares from the November
2005 Board approval.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

October 1 to October 31, 2005
November 1 to November 30, 2005
December 1 to December 31, 2005
Total

Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
-
-
9,800
9,800

Average
Price
Paid
per Share
-
-
$40.04
$40.04

Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
as Part of
Publicly
Announced
Program
-
-
9,800
9,800

Approximate
Dollar Value of
Shares that May
Yet Be Purchased
Under the
Program (a)
$14,599,000
$25,000,000
$24,608,000
$24,608,000

(a) The approximate dollar value of shares that may be purchased increased to $25.0 million on November 8, 2005 as a result of the authorization
obtained from the Board of Directors to replace the then existing authorization program that still had $14.6 million remaining prior to being
replaced.

As of February 17, 2006, the Company had purchased a total of 229,100 shares at an average price of $39.37 per
share pursuant to the existing program approved on November 8, 2005, and had approximately $16.0 million
remaining available for repurchase under the current Board-approved repurchase program.

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

2005

2004

2003

2002

2001

Income Statement (Year Ended December 31):

Revenue

Gross margin

$1,347,646

$1,174,635

$1,068,493

$1,032,025

$975,636

$ 340,123

$ 299,021

$ 266,961

$ 242,705

$216,245

Income before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle

Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle - net of income taxes

$ 100,785

$ 91,534

$ 81,730

$ 66,612

$ 52,601

$ 2,681

Net income

$ 100,785

$ 91,534

$ 81,730

$ 66,612

$ 55,282

Earnings per common share before cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle:
Basic
Diluted

Earnings per common share:
Basic
Diluted

Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic
Diluted

$ 7.05
$ 6.93

$ 6.49
$ 6.35

$ 5.66
$ 5.51

$ 4.41
$ 4.30

$ 3.49
$ 3.39

$ 7.05
$ 6.93

$ 6.49
$ 6.35

$ 5.66
$ 5.51

$ 4.41
$ 4.30

$ 3.66
$ 3.56

14,302
14,539

14,107
14,407

14,428
14,825

15,104
15,505

15,092
15,530

Dividends per common share

$ 0.10

Balance Sheet (December 31):

Inventory

Total assets

$1,076,132

$ 798,486

$ 591,626

$ 451,217

$479,236

$1,329,678

$ 978,526

$ 746,872

$ 578,458

$612,110

Notes and mortgage notes payable

$ 313,165

$ 317,370

$ 129,614

$ 41,458

$144,227

Senior notes

Subordinated notes

Shareholders’ equity

$ 198,400

$ 50,000

$ 592,568

$ 487,611

$ 402,409

$ 339,729

$279,891

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
New contracts
Homes delivered
Backlog at end of period
Revenue
Gross margin
Net income
Earnings per common share:
Basic
Diluted
Weighted average common shares outstanding
(In thousands):
Basic
Diluted
Dividends per common share

New contracts
Homes delivered
Backlog at end of period
Revenue
Gross margin
Net income
Earnings per common share:
Basic
Diluted
Weighted average common shares outstanding
(In thousands):
Basic
Diluted
Dividends per common share

December 31,
2005
(Unaudited)
901
1,616
2,807
$507,770
$126,937
$ 41,315

Three Months Ended

September 30,
2005
(Unaudited)
1,163
1,047
3,522
$332,478
$ 84,748
$ 25,079

June 30,
2005
(Unaudited)
1,172
853
3,310
$265,999
$ 67,713
$ 17,645

March 31,
2005
(Unaudited)
1,078
775
2,991
$241,399
$ 60,725
$ 16,746

$ 2.88
$ 2.84

$ 1.75
$ 1.72

$ 1.23
$ 1.21

$ 1.18
$ 1.16

14,333
14,538
$ 0.025

14,325
14,577
$ 0.025

14,308
14,531
$ 0.025

14,238
14,498
$ 0.025

December 31,
2004
(Unaudited)
922
1,200
2,688
$349,278
$ 82,346
$ 24,549

$ 1.74
$ 1.70

14,141
14,412
$ 0.025

Three Months Ended

September 30,
2004
(Unaudited)

971
1,135
2,966
$315,496
$ 77,954
$ 22,567

$ 1.60
$ 1.57

14,099
14,370
$ 0.025

June 30,
2004
(Unaudited)
1,128
1,097
3,130
$281,197
$ 77,629
$ 24,881

March 31,
2004
(Unaudited)
1,312
871
3,099
$228,664
$ 61,092
$ 19,537

$ 1.76
$ 1.73

$ 1.39
$ 1.35

14,122
14,394
$ 0.025

14,065
14,435
$ 0.025

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

OVERVIEW

M/I Homes, Inc. (“the Company”) is one of the nation’s leading builders of single-family homes, having sold more
than 64,000 homes since our inception in 1976. The Company’s homes are marketed and sold under the trade
names M/I Homes, Showcase Homes and Shamrock Homes. The Company has homebuilding operations in
Columbus and Cincinnati, Ohio; Indianapolis, Indiana; Tampa, Orlando and West Palm Beach, Florida; Charlotte
and Raleigh, North Carolina; Delaware; and the Virginia and Maryland suburbs of Washington, D.C. In 2004, the
latest year for which information is available, we were the 20th largest U.S. single-family homebuilder (based on
homes delivered) as ranked by Builder Magazine.

Included in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations are the
following topics relevant to the Company’s performance and financial condition:

● Information Relating to Forward-Looking Statements
● Our Application of Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies
● Our Results of Operations
● Discussion of Our Liquidity and Capital Resources
● Summary of Our Contractual Obligations
● Discussion of Our Utilization of Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
● Impact of Interest Rates and Inflation

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain information included in this report or in other materials we have filed or will file with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) (as well as information included in oral statements or other written statements
made or to be made by us) contains or may contain forward-looking statements, including, but not limited to,
statements regarding our future financial performance and financial condition. Words such as “expects,”
“anticipates,” “targets,” “goals,” “projects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” variations of such
words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements involve a
number of risks and uncertainties. Any forward-looking statements that we make herein and in future reports and
statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual results may differ materially from those in such
forward-looking statements as a result of various factors relating to the economic environment, interest rates,
availability of resources, competition, market concentration, land development activities and various governmental
rules and regulations, as more fully discussed in the Risk Factors section. We undertake no obligation to publicly
update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
However, any further disclosures made on related subjects in our subsequent reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K
should be consulted. This discussion is provided as permitted by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995, and all of our forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements
contained or referenced in this section and in the Item 1A. Risk Factors.

APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES AND POLICIES

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Management
bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying
value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. On an ongoing basis, management
evaluates such estimates and judgments and makes adjustments as deemed necessary. Actual results could differ
from these estimates using different estimates and assumptions, or if conditions are significantly different in the
future. Listed below are those estimates that we believe are critical and require the use of complex judgment in their
application.

Revenue Recognition. Revenue from the sale of a home is recognized when the closing has occurred, title has
passed and an adequate initial and continuing investment by the homebuyer is received, in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 66, “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate” (“SFAS 66”),
or when the loan has been sold to a third party investor. Revenue for homes that close to the buyer having a deposit

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

of 5% or greater, those financed by third parties, and all home closings insured under FHA or VA government-
insured programs are recorded in the financial statements on the date of closing. Revenue related to all other home
closings initially funded by our wholly-owned subsidiary, M/I Financial, Corp. (“M/I Financial”), is recorded on the
date that M/I Financial sells the loan to a third party investor, because the receivable from the third party investor is
not subject to future subordination and the Company has transferred to this investor the usual risks and rewards of
ownership that is in substance a sale and does not have a substantial continuing involvement with the home, in
accordance with SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments
of Liabilities” (“SFAS 140”). All associated homebuilding costs are charged to cost of sales in the period when the
revenues from home closings are recognized. Homebuilding costs include land and land development costs, home
construction costs (including an estimate of the costs to complete construction), previously capitalized indirect costs
and estimated warranty costs. All other costs are expensed as incurred.

We recognize the majority of the revenue associated with our mortgage loan operations when the mortgage loans
and related servicing rights are sold to third party investors. We defer the application and origination fees, net of
costs, and recognize them as revenue, along with the associated gains or losses on the sale of the loans and related
servicing rights, when the loans are sold to third party investors in accordance with SFAS No. 91, “Accounting for
Nonrefundable Fees and Costs Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans.” The revenue recognized is
reduced by the fair value of the related guaranty provided to the investor. The guaranty fair value is recognized in
revenue when the Company is released from its obligation under the guaranty. Generally, all of the financial
services mortgage loans and related servicing rights are sold to third party investors within two weeks of origination.
We recognize financial services revenue associated with our title operations as homes are closed, closing services
are rendered and title policies are issued, all of which generally occur simultaneously as each home is closed. All of
the underwriting risk associated with title insurance policies is transferred to third party insurers.

Inventories. We use the specific identification method for the purpose of accumulating costs associated with home
construction. Inventories are recorded at cost, unless they are determined to be impaired, in which case the impaired
inventories are written down to fair value less cost to sell in accordance with SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.” In addition to the costs of direct land acquisition, land development
and related costs (both incurred and estimated to be incurred) and home construction costs, inventories include
capitalized interest, real estate taxes and certain indirect costs incurred during land development and home
construction. Such costs are charged to cost of sales simultaneously with revenue recognition, as discussed above.
When a home is closed, we typically have not yet paid all incurred costs necessary to complete the home. As homes
close, we compare the home construction budget to actual recorded costs to date to estimate the additional costs to
be incurred from our subcontractors related to the home. We record a liability and a corresponding charge to cost of
sales for the amount we estimate will ultimately be paid related to that home. We monitor the accuracy of such
estimate by comparing actual costs incurred in subsequent months to the estimate. Although actual costs to
complete in the future could differ from the estimate, our method has historically produced consistently accurate
estimates of actual costs to complete closed homes.

Consolidated Inventory Not Owned. We enter into land option agreements in the ordinary course of business in
order to secure land for the construction of houses in the future. Pursuant to these land option agreements, we
provide a deposit to the seller as consideration for the right to purchase land at different times in the future, usually
at predetermined prices. If the entity holding the land under option is a variable interest entity, the Company’s
deposit (including letters of credit) represents a variable interest in the entity, and we must use our judgment to
determine if we are the primary beneficiary of the entity. Factors considered in determining whether we are the
primary beneficiary include the amount of the deposit in relation to the fair value of the land, expected timing of our
purchase of the land and assumptions about projected cash flows. We consider our accounting policies with respect
to determining whether we are the primary beneficiary to be critical accounting policies due to the judgment
required.

Investment in Unconsolidated Limited Liability Companies. We invest in entities that acquire and develop land for
distribution or sale to us in connection with our homebuilding operations. Certain of these entities have been
determined to meet the criteria of variable interest entities because they lack sufficient equity to finance their
operations, and we must use our judgment to determine if we are the primary beneficiary of the entity. Certain of
these entities have been determined to not meet the criteria of variable interest entities because they have sufficient
equity and have obtained outside financing, and we must use our judgment to determine if we have a controlling
interest in the entity. Factors considered in determining whether we have significant influence or we have control
include risk and reward sharing, experience and financial condition of the other partners, voting rights, involvement
in day-to-day capital and operating decisions and continuing involvement. We consider our accounting policies
with respect to determining whether we are the primary beneficiary or have control or significant influence to be

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

critical accounting policies due to the judgment required. Based on the application of our accounting policies, these
entities are accounted for by the equity method of accounting.

Guarantees and Indemnities. Guaranty and indemnity liabilities are established by charging the applicable income
statement or balance sheet line, depending on the nature of the guaranty or indemnity, and crediting a liability. M/I
Financial provides a limited-life guaranty on loans sold to certain third parties, and estimates its actual liability
related to the guaranty, and any indemnities subsequently provided to the purchaser of the loans in lieu of loan
repurchase, based on historical loss experience. Actual future costs associated with loans guaranteed or indemnified
could differ materially from our current estimated amounts. The Company has also provided certain other
guaranties and indemnifications in connection with the purchase and development of land, including environmental
indemnifications, guaranties of the completion of land development and minimum net worth guaranties of certain
subsidiaries. The Company estimates these liabilities based on the estimated cost of insurance coverage or estimated
cost of acquiring a bond in the amount of the exposure. Actual future costs associated with these guaranties and
indemnifications could differ materially from our current estimated amounts.

Warranty. Warranty accruals are established by charging cost of sales and crediting a warranty accrual for each
home closed. The amounts charged are estimated by management to be adequate to cover expected warranty-related
costs for materials and labor required under the Company’s warranty programs. Accruals for warranties under our
two-year limited warranty program and our 20-year (pre-1998) and 30-year structural warranty program are
established as a percentage of average sales price and on a per unit basis, respectively, and are based upon historical
experience by geographic area and recent trends. Factors that are given consideration in determining the accruals
include: 1) the historical range of amounts paid per average sales price on a home; 2) type and mix of amenity
packages added to the home; 3) any warranty expenditures included in the above not considered to be normal and
recurring; 4) timing of payments; 5) improvements in quality of construction expected to impact future warranty
expenditures; 6) actuarial estimates prepared by an independent third party, which considers both Company and
industry data; and 7) conditions that may affect certain projects and require a different percentage of average sales
price for those specific projects.

Changes in estimates for pre-existing warranties occur due to changes in the historical payment experience, and are
also due to differences between the actual payment pattern experienced during the period and the historical payment
pattern used in our evaluation of the warranty accrual balance at the end of each quarter. Actual future warranty
costs could differ materially from our currently estimated amount.

Self-insurance. Self-insurance accruals are made for estimated liabilities associated with employee health care,
Ohio workers’ compensation and general liability insurance. Our self-insurance limit for employee health care is
$250,000 per claim per year for fiscal 2005, with stop loss insurance covering amounts in excess of $250,000 up to
$1,750,000 per claim per year. Our self-insurance limit for workers’ compensation is $300,000 per claim with stop
loss insurance covering all amounts in excess of this limit. The accruals related to employee health care and
workers’ compensation are based on historical experience and open cases. Our general liability claims are insured
by a third party; the Company generally has a $5.0 million deductible per occurrence and in the aggregate, with
lower deductibles for certain types of claims. The Company records a general liability accrual for claims falling
below the Company’s deductible. The general liability accrual estimate is based on an actuarial evaluation of our
past history of claims and other industry specific factors. The Company has recorded expenses totaling $6.4 million,
$4.9 million and $5.3 million for all self-insured and general liability claims during the years ended December 31,
2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Because of the high degree of judgment required in determining these estimated
accrual amounts, actual future costs could differ from our current estimated amounts.

Derivative Financial Instruments. The Company has the following types of derivative financial instruments:
mortgage loans held for sale and interest rate lock commitments. Mortgage loans held for sale consist primarily of
single-family residential loans collateralized by the underlying property. All mortgage loans are committed to third-
party investors at the date of funding and are typically sold to such investors within two weeks of funding. The
commitments associated with funded loans are designated as fair value hedges of the risk of changes in the overall
fair value of the related loans. Accordingly, changes in the value of derivative instruments are recognized in current
earnings, as are changes in the value of the loans. The net gain or loss is included in financial services revenue. To
meet financing needs of our home-buying customers, M/I Financial is party to interest rate lock commitments
(“IRLCs”), which are extended to customers who have applied for a mortgage loan and meet certain defined credit
and underwriting criteria. In accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities” (“SFAS 133”) and related Derivatives Implementation Group conclusions, the Company classifies and
accounts for IRLCs as non-designated derivative instruments at fair value with gains and losses recorded in current
earnings. M/I Financial manages interest rate risk related to its IRLC loans through the use of forward sales of
mortgage-backed securities (“FMBSs”), use of best-efforts whole loan delivery commitments and the occasional

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

purchase of options on FMBSs in accordance with Company policy. These instruments are considered non-
designated derivatives and are accounted for at fair value, with gains or losses recorded in current earnings.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The Company’s chief operating decision makers evaluate the Company’s performance on a consolidated basis and
by evaluating our two segments, homebuilding operations and financial services operations. The homebuilding
operations include the development of land, the sale and construction of single-family attached and detached homes
and the occasional sale of lots to third parties. The homebuilding operations include similar operations in several
geographic regions that have been aggregated for segment reporting purposes. The financial services operations
include the origination and sale of mortgage loans and title services for purchasers of the Company’s homes.

In conformity with SFAS No. 131, “Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information” (“SFAS
131”), the Company’s segment information is presented on the basis that the chief operating decision makers use in
evaluating segment performance. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Note 1 of our Consolidated Financial Statements.
Eliminations consist of fees paid by the homebuilding operations relating to loan origination and title fees for its
homebuyers that are included in financial services’ revenue; the homebuilding segment’s housing costs include
these fees paid to financial services.

During the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company’s chief operating decision makers made a decision to change how
the total business was viewed to include corporate and other, previously shown separately within the Company’s
segment reporting, within the homebuilding segment. The chief operating decision makers made this change
because they believe this is a better way to view the Company’s results, and will also provide more comparable
information with the homebuilding industry. As required under SFAS 131, the Company has restated all prior
period segment information to be consistent with the 2005 segment reporting.

Highlights and Trends for the Year Ended December 31, 2005

● Homes delivered declined compared to 2004, from 4,303 in 2004 to 4,291 in 2005. The decline in homes
delivered was due to softness in our Midwest markets, lower community counts going into 2005 and delays in
our Florida markets caused by weather, longer regulatory processes and shortages in certain materials and labor.
We anticipate 2006 homes delivered to be approximately 5,000, with the growth being driven entirely by our
markets outside the Midwest.

● Total revenue for 2005 increased 15% over 2004 to $1.3 billion. Housing revenue increased 11% due to an 11%
increase in the average sales price of homes delivered, from $267,000 in 2004 to $298,000 in 2005. Land
revenue increased $28.4 million, primarily as a result of lots sold to third parties in Tampa, Orlando, Columbus
and Washington, D.C. during 2005. In addition, during 2005, our homebuilding operations recognized $6.6
million of revenue related to the change in home closings with low-down payment loans that were not yet sold
to a third party, whereas the impact to revenue for 2004 resulted in a $14.0 million reduction in revenue. Our
financial services revenue declined $4.3 million (13%) compared to the prior year due to 8% fewer loan
originations and lower gains on the sale of loans to third parties resulting from the change in mix of loans sold.

● For 2005, approximately 33% of our operating income was derived from operations in our Columbus market,
compared to approximately 44% for 2004. We anticipate that this percentage will continue to decline during
2006 as a higher percentage of our homes delivered are expected in markets outside of Columbus. In 2006, we
anticipate that a significant portion of our operating income will be derived from our Florida markets.

● Income before income taxes for 2005 increased $10.1 million and 7% over 2004, driven by the 15% increase in
revenue described above, partially offset by a lower gross margin percentage (25.2% in 2005 compared to
25.5% in 2004), along with a 24% increase in general and administrative expenses and a 69% increase in
interest expense. The 24% ($15.7 million) increase in general and administrative expenses was primarily due to
land-related expenses associated with our growth and diversification activities, including real estate taxes,
homeowner’s association fees for active communities and additional personnel costs, totaling approximately
$6.9 million. Also in 2005, we expensed certain deposits and costs totaling $2.5 million on land transactions
where the return potential had declined from the initial evaluation or certain contingencies were not satisfied.
Additionally, the increase was due to the absence in 2005 of $2.3 million of income relating to interest rate
swaps that terminated in September 2004. Partially offsetting these higher general and administrative costs was
the absence in 2005 of $1.9 million of expense recorded in 2004’s general and administrative expense relating to
the redemption of our $50 million senior notes. The 69% ($5.8 million) increase in interest expense was the

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

result of higher weighted average borrowings and a slightly higher weighted average interest rate, partially
offset by an increase in interest capitalized due to an increase in land under development and backlog. In 2006,
we anticipate gross margins could decline approximately 50-100 basis points due primarily to incentives being
offered in our Midwest markets, along with a normalization of margins in our Florida and Washington, D.C.
markets.

● 2005’s new contracts of 4,314 were down compared to 4,333 in 2004. Market conditions in the Midwest, where
our new contracts were down 18%, along with certain weather and permitting related delays we experienced
during 2005 in opening new communities, resulted in lower than anticipated new contracts. Our goal for new
contracts continues to be an annual increase of approximately 15%.

● As a result of lower refinance volume for outside lenders, we expect to experience continued pressure on our
mortgage company’s capture rate, which was approximately 84% during 2005 and 83% during 2004. This
could negatively affect earnings.

● We continue to focus on our land position and purchased $320 million of land in 2005, including our July 2005
acquisition of a private homebuilder in Florida. Over 80% of those purchases were in markets outside the
Midwest. We continue to increase our land position in our Florida, North Carolina and Washington, D.C.
markets, where we expect our future growth to be primarily generated. We currently expect to purchase
approximately $250 million of land in 2006, including land purchases by unconsolidated limited liability
companies that we hold an interest in.

● During 2005, we issued $200 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.875% senior notes due April 2012.
The proceeds from this offering were used to pay down our existing revolving bank borrowings. We believe
this issuance provided us with long-term strategic capital at an attractive cost and increases the flexibility for our
financing needs.

● Our effective tax rate was 37.6% for 2005 compared to 39.5% for 2004. The reduction was primarily a result of
the manufacturing credit established by the 2004 American Jobs Creation Act. The decrease is also due to a
change in the state of Ohio’s tax laws, which phases out the Ohio income tax and replaces it with a gross
receipts tax, which is classified as general and administrative expense. We do not expect this change in Ohio’s
tax laws to have a material impact on our cash flows. In addition, we had a favorable resolution of certain state-
related tax matters during 2005. We currently estimate our 2006 effective rate to be approximately 38.0%.

● We expect our 2006 net income to be impacted by approximately $3.0 million of expense, net of tax, associated
with equity compensation that must begin being expensed under new accounting standards effective January 1,
2006.

Highlights and Trends for the Year Ended December 31, 2004

● Our revenue increase of 10% over 2003 was driven by a 9% increase in the average sales price of homes

delivered, along with a 4% increase in the number of homes delivered.

● Income before taxes increase of 12.0% over 2003 was driven by the revenue increase above combined with a
slight improvement in homebuilding margins from 22.9% to 23.1%, resulting from additional house options
being sold that carry higher margins along with cost efficiencies in land development. Additionally, our
financial services operations generated $1.5 million higher income than in 2003, of which nearly $1.0 million
was the result of the increase in ownership of one of our title companies. Partially offsetting these increases
were $3.0 million higher warranty costs due mainly to a change in estimate for our 30-year structural warranty,
$2.2 million of costs incurred relating to the Florida hurricanes, $4.5 million costs incurred for the early
termination of our $50 million senior subordinated notes, and $3.5 million higher interest costs due to an
increase in borrowings.

● We spent approximately $270 million on land purchases during 2004. During 2004, we also increased the

amount of land held under option agreement by $123 million, an increase of 39%.

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

(In thousands)
Revenue:
Homebuilding
Financial services
Eliminations
Total Revenue
Depreciation and Amortization:
Homebuilding
Financial services
Total Depreciation and Amortization
Interest Expense:
Homebuilding
Financial services
Total Interest Expense
Income Before Income Taxes:
Homebuilding
Financial services
Total Income Before Income Taxes
Income Taxes:
Homebuilding
Financial services
Total Income Taxes
Assets:
Homebuilding
Financial services
Total Assets
Capital Expenditures:
Homebuilding
Financial services
Total Capital Expenditures

Other company financial information:

Effective tax rate

Total gross margin %

Total operating margin %

2005

Year Ended December 31,
2004

2003

$1,326,751
28,635
(7,740)
$1,347,646

$1,150,136
32,909
(8,410)
$1,174,635

$1,045,680
27,666
(4,853)
$1,068,493

$ 4,410

$ 4,498

$ 13,737

371

$ 14,108

$ 143,378

18,049

$ 161,427

$ 53,862

6,780

$ 60,642

$1,252,567

77,111
$1,329,678

$ 3,626

219

$ 3,845

$ 2,336
112
$ 2,448

$ 8,052
290
$ 8,342

$ 129,665
21,632
$ 151,297

$ 51,218
8,545
$ 59,763

$ 901,605
76,921
$ 978,526

$ 1,570
114
$ 1,684

$ 2,254
128
$ 2,382

$ 4,595
236
$ 4,831

$ 115,006
20,093
$ 135,099

$ 45,432
7,937
$ 53,369

$ 675,807
71,065
$ 746,872

$ 15,707
36
$ 15,743

37.6%

39.5%

25.2%

25.5%

25.0%

13.0%

13.6%

13.1%

Seasonality and Variability in Quarterly Results

We have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, significant seasonality and quarter-to-quarter variability
in homebuilding activity levels. In general, homes delivered increase substantially in the third and fourth quarters.
We believe that this seasonality reflects the tendency of homebuyers to shop for a new home in the spring with the
goal of closing in the fall or winter, as well as the scheduling of construction to accommodate seasonal weather
conditions. We also have experienced, and expect to continue to experience, seasonality in our financial services
operations because loan originations correspond with the delivery of homes in our homebuilding operations. The
following table reflects this cycle for the Company during the four quarters of 2005 and 2004:

(Dollars in thousands)
Revenue
Unit data:
New contracts
Homes delivered
Backlog at end of period

Revenue
Unit data:
New contracts
Homes delivered
Backlog at end of period

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

Three Months Ended

December 31,
2005
(Unaudited)

$507,770

September 30,
2005
(Unaudited)

$332,478

June 30,
2005
(Unaudited)
$265,999

March 31,
2005
(Unaudited)
$241,399

901
1,616
2,807

1,163
1,047
3,522

1,172
853
3,310

1,078
775
2,991

Three Months Ended

December 31,
2004
(Unaudited)

$349,278

September 30,
2004
(Unaudited)

$315,496

June 30,
2004
(Unaudited)
$281,197

March 31,
2004
(Unaudited)
$228,664

922
1,200
2,688

971
1,135
2,966

1,128
1,097
3,130

1,312
871
3,099

Homebuilding Operations

As discussed above, during the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company’s chief operating decision makers made a
decision to change how the total business was viewed to include corporate and other, previously shown separately
within the Company’s segment reporting, within the homebuilding segment. This homebuilding segment change
also resulted in a change in the components within homebuilding. Housing revenue represents revenue generated
from the delivery of homes to homebuyers, land revenue consists of the sale of land and lots to external parties and
other revenue consists of revenue related to the timing of homes delivered with low-down payment loans (buyers put
less than 5% down) funded by the Company’s financial services operations, not yet sold to a third party. In
accordance with SFAS 66 and SFAS 140, recognition of such sales must be deferred until the related loan is sold to
a third party.

(Dollars in thousands)
Revenue:

Housing
Land

Other

Total revenue
Revenue:

Housing
Land
Other
Total revenue
Land and housing costs
Gross margin
General and administrative expenses
Selling expenses
Operating income
Interest
Income before income taxes
Ohio and Indiana Region
Unit data:

New contracts
Homes delivered
Backlog at end of period

Average sales price of homes in backlog
Aggregate sales value of homes in backlog
Number of active communities
Florida Region
Unit data:

New contracts
Homes delivered
Backlog at end of period

Average sales price of homes in backlog
Aggregate sales value of homes in backlog
Number of active communities
North Carolina, Delaware and Washington, D.C. Region
Unit data:

New contracts
Homes delivered
Backlog at end of period

Average sales price of homes in backlog
Aggregate sales value of homes in backlog
Number of active communities
Total
Unit data:

New contracts
Homes delivered
Backlog at end of period

Average sales price of homes in backlog
Aggregate sales value of homes in backlog
Number of active communities

2005

Year Ended December 31,
2004

2003

$1,276,803
43,326

$1,149,227
14,884

6,622

(13,975)

$1,020,898
24,782

$1,326,751

$1,150,136

$1,045,680

96.2%
3.3
0.5
100.0
76.5
23.5
5.3
6.3
11.9
1.1

99.9%

1.3
(1.2)
100.0
76.9
23.1
4.8
6.3
12.0
0.7

10.8%

11.3%

97.6%
2.4
-
100.0
77.1
22.9
4.9
6.6
11.4
0.4
11.0%

2,018
2,388
940
$ 288
$ 271,000

2,450
2,778
1,310
$ 281
$ 369,000

2,856
2,741
1,638

$ 252
$ 413,000

1,609
1,261
1,540

$ 352
$ 542,000

687
642
327

$ 431
$ 141,000

1,312
994
1,096
$ 281
$ 308,000
22

571
531
282
$ 437
$ 123,000

1,160
923
778

$ 254
$ 197,000

469
484
242

$ 390
$ 94,000

4,314
4,291
2,807

$ 340
$ 954,000

150

4,333
4,303
2,688
$ 298
$ 800,000
125

4,485
4,148
2,658
$ 265
$ 704,000

135

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

A home is included in “new contracts” when our standard sales contract is executed. “Homes delivered” represents
homes for which the closing of the sale has occurred. “Backlog” represents homes for which the standard sales
contract has been executed, but which are not included in homes delivered because closings for these homes have
not yet occurred as of the end of the period specified. Most cancellations of contracts for homes in backlog occur
because customers cannot qualify for financing and usually occur prior to the start of construction. The cancellation
rate was approximately 21% in each of the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003. Unsold speculative
homes, which are in various stages of construction, totaled 382, 213 and 99 at December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, with related dollar investment of $50.2 million, $27.9 million and $12.0 million, respectively. During
2005, the Company increased its investment in unsold speculative homes, primarily in the Midwest region, for
competitive purposes and to provide potential homebuyers with more flexibility and the ability to see certain options
in our homes.

Year Ended December 31, 2005 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2004

Revenue. Revenue for the homebuilding segment was $1.3 billion, an increase of 15% and $176.6 million from
2004. This increase was due to an 11% increase in housing revenue ($127.6 million), a 191% increase in land
revenue ($28.4 million) and a $20.6 million increase in revenue related to the timing of homes delivered with low-
down payment loans (buyers put less than 5% down) funded by the Company’s financial services operations, not yet
sold to a third party. In accordance with SFAS 66 and SFAS 140, recognition of such sales must be deferred until
the related loan is sold to a third party. The increase in housing revenue was due to an increase of 11% in the
average sales price of homes delivered, from $267,000 in 2004 to $298,000 in 2005, with our North Carolina and
Washington, D.C. region up 19% and increases in all of our other markets except West Palm Beach. The number of
homes delivered declined from 4,303 to 4,291, primarily as a result of an expected decline in the Midwest (Ohio and
Indiana), where deliveries were down 14% due to softness of the economy. The $28.4 million increase in land
revenue was due primarily to third party sales of lots in Tampa, Orlando, Columbus and Washington, D.C., which
had $42.7 million of revenue in 2005 compared to $11.6 million in 2004 in these markets. Land revenue can vary
significantly from period to period, given that management opportunistically determines the particular land or lots to
be sold directly to third parties.

Home Sales and Backlog. New contracts decreased in 2005, from 4,333 to 4,314; however, the mix of new
contracts changed, with an 18% decline in the Midwest being offset by increases in Florida, North Carolina and
Washington, D.C. The number of new contracts recorded in future periods will be dependent on numerous factors,
including future economic conditions, timing of land acquisitions and development, consumer confidence, number
of communities and interest rates available to potential homebuyers. At December 31, 2005, our backlog consisted
of 2,807 homes, with an approximate sales value of $954.0 million, with backlog sales value in our Florida markets
up 76% compared to December 31, 2004. This overall increase in backlog represents a 4% increase in units and a
19% increase in sales value from December 31, 2004. The average sales price of homes in backlog increased by
14%, with increases occurring in most of our markets. This increase in the average sales price of homes in backlog
is attributable partially to the overall increase in sales prices of our new contracts due to customers selecting more
options, along with the mix of homes in backlog at the end of the quarter including more homes than the prior year
within our Florida and Washington, D.C. markets, where our homes generally carry higher sales prices than in our
Midwest region.

Gross Margin. The gross margin for the homebuilding segment was 23.5% for 2005, a slight increase from the
23.1% gross margin in 2004. Housing gross margin increased from 23.3% to 23.7% and land gross margin
increased from 12.2% to 16.8%. The increase in housing’s gross margin was driven by improved gross margins in
our Florida and Washington, D.C. markets, along with the impact of the geographical mix of homes delivered in our
various markets, partially offset by an expected decrease in gross margins in the Midwest due to economic factors.
Land gross margins can vary significantly depending on the sales price, the cost of the community and the stage of
development in which the sale takes place.

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses increased from $55.7 million and
4.8% of revenue during 2004 to $70.4 million and 5.3% of revenue in 2005. The increase was primarily due to
land-related expenses associated with our growth and diversification activities totaling $6.9 million, including a $2.1
million increase in payroll-related costs, $3.1 million increase in real estate taxes and homeowner’s association fees
related to having more raw land and more active communities than in 2004, and $0.5 million increase in
architectural expenses associated with new product designs. Also in 2005, we expensed certain deposits and costs
totaling $2.5 million on land transactions where the return potential had declined from the initial evaluation or
certain contingencies were not satisfied. In addition, our acquisition of Shamrock on July 1, 2005 resulted in an
additional $1.9 million of general and administrative expenses, including $0.7 million amortization of intangible
assets. Also impacting the increase was the absence in 2005 of $2.3 million of income recorded in 2004 associated

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

with our interest rate swaps that expired during 2004 and a $0.9 million increase in insurance costs. These increases
were partially offset by the 2005’s absence of $1.9 million of expense recorded during 2004 relating to the
redemption of our $50 million senior notes.

Selling Expenses. Selling expenses increased from $72.7 million in 2004 to $83.9 million in 2005; however, selling
expenses remained constant at 6.3% of total revenue. The dollar increase was due primarily to a $5.3 million
increase in sales commissions paid to outside realtors relating to homes delivered and a $1.8 million increase in
internal sales commissions due to the higher average sales price of homes delivered. Additionally, sales office and
model expenses increased $2.3 million primarily due to the increase in new communities.

Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2003

Revenue. Revenue for the homebuilding segment was $1.2 billion, an increase of 10% and $104.5 million from
2003. This increase was due to a 13% increase in housing revenue ($128.3 million), offset partially by a 40%
decrease in land revenue ($9.9 million). The increase in housing revenue was primarily due to an increase of 9% in
the average sales price of homes delivered, from $246,000 in 2003 to $267,000 in 2004, along with the 4% increase
in the number of homes delivered from 4,148 in 2003 to 4,303 in 2004. The average sales price of homes delivered
increased in all of our markets, with the largest increases occurring in our Florida region. The number of homes
delivered increased in all of our markets except Indianapolis and Tampa. Indianapolis was lower than 2003 due to
the available communities consisting of some older, less desirable communities that we were closing out, and
Tampa was lower than 2003 due to the impact of delays in land development and opening of new communities and
general slowness of the building permit process. The decrease in land revenue was primarily due to our exit from
the Phoenix market which had no outside lot sales in 2004 compared to $14.0 million in 2003. Reductions in land
revenue totaling $3.7 million occurred in our Charlotte and Raleigh markets due to the sell-off of remaining lots in
less desirable communities in 2003. Partially offsetting these decreases was a $4.7 million increase in Washington,
D.C., where 31 lots were sold in 2004 compared to 1 lot in 2003. Land revenue can vary significantly from year to
year, given that management opportunistically determines the particular land or lots to be sold directly to third
parties.

Home Sales and Backlog. New contracts in 2004 decreased 3.4% over the prior year, from 4,485 to 4,333. New
contracts decreased 14.2% in our Midwest (Ohio and Indiana) region, despite an increase in our Cincinnati market,
primarily due to higher mortgage rates, nominal job growth and regulatory delays in opening new communities. We
expect the Midwest market conditions and the delays in opening new communities to also adversely affect sales in
the Midwest during the first half of 2005 when compared to the same period in 2004. New contracts increased in all
of our other markets except Tampa, with the largest increases occurring in our Cincinnati, Orlando and Charlotte
markets due to both the economic conditions in those markets and the availability of new communities in exclusive
or high demand locations. The number of new contracts recorded in future periods will be dependent on numerous
factors, including future economic conditions, timing of land acquisitions and development, consumer confidence,
number of communities and interest rates available to potential homebuyers. At December 31, 2004, our backlog
consisted of 2,688 homes, with an approximate sales value of $800.0 million. This represents a 1.1% increase in
units and a 13.6% increase in sales value from December 31, 2003. The average sales price of homes in backlog
increased by 12.5%, with increases occurring in most of our markets. This increase in the average sales price of
homes in backlog is attributable partially to the overall increase in sales prices of our new contracts due to customers
selecting more options, along with the mix of homes in backlog at the end of 2004 including more homes than the
prior year-end within our Florida and Washington, D.C. markets, where our homes carry higher sales prices than in
our Midwest region.

Gross Margin. The gross margin for the homebuilding segment was 23.1% for 2004, compared to 22.9% for 2003.
Housing gross margin increased from 23.1% to 23.3% and land gross margin decreased from 13.8% to 12.2%. The
increase in housing’s gross margin was mainly due to the increase in sales prices in excess of cost increases within
certain markets, due to demand, with the largest impact in the West Palm Beach, Columbus and Tampa markets.
Several other markets showed smaller increases in gross margin percentage as a result of changes in mix of homes
delivered, including the impact of customers selecting more options, which generally have higher margins, along
with operating efficiencies. The increase in land’s gross margin was due primarily to lots sold in the Washington,
D.C. market. Land gross margins can vary significantly from year to year depending on the sales price, the cost of
the community and the stage of development in which the sale takes place.

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses increased from $51.2 million in 2003
to $55.7 million in 2004, but decreased as a percentage of revenue from 4.9% to 4.8%. The dollar increase was
primarily due to $2.4 million higher payroll-related costs relating to the increases in homes delivered and net
income, $1.9 million expense in 2004 for certain costs incurred for the prepayment of our senior subordinated notes

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

and a $1.0 million increase in audit and professional fees primarily as a result of implementation of programs that
are now required of public companies. Offsetting the above increases is a $2.3 million decrease in management
bonuses that is a result of the passing of our former Chairman, a $1.1 million decrease in homeowner’s association
fees and real estate taxes due to fewer open communities and 2004’s absence of a $0.7 million commission paid on
Phoenix land sales related to exiting that market.

Selling Expenses. Selling expenses increased from $68.5 million in 2003 to $72.7 million in 2004; however, selling
expenses decreased from 6.6% of revenue in 2003 to 6.3% in 2004. The dollar increase was due primarily to a $3.6
million increase in sales commissions paid to outside realtors relating to homes delivered and a $2.7 million increase
in internal sales commissions due to both higher average sales price of homes delivered and the increase in the
number of homes delivered. These increases were partially offset by 2004’s allocation of $1.7 million of marketing
costs to financial services associated with slowing Midwest business.

Financial Services Operations

The following table sets forth certain information related to our financial services operations:

(Dollars in thousands)
Number of loans originated
Value of loans originated
Revenue
General & administrative expenses
Income before income taxes

Year Ended December 31,

2005

2,959
$666,684
$ 28,635
10,586
$ 18,049

2004
3,221
$695,192
$ 32,909
11,277
$ 21,632

2003
3,290
$649,794
$ 27,666
7,573
$ 20,093

Year Ended December 31, 2005 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2004

Revenue. Mortgage and title operations revenue decreased $4.3 million (13%), from $32.9 million in 2004 to $28.6
million in 2005. The decrease was expected, and was the result of an 8% decline in the number of loans originated
combined with the absence in 2005 of $2.1 million of income recorded in 2004 resulting from a change in estimate
related to marking interest rate lock commitments to market value in accordance with SFAS 133 and related
derivatives guidance. At December 31, 2005, M/I Financial was operating in eight of our nine markets. In these
eight markets, 84% of our 2005 homes delivered that were financed were through M/I Financial. As a result of
lower refinance volume for outside lenders, resulting in increased competition for M/I’s homebuyer customer, in
2006 we expect to experience continued downward pressure on our capture rate and margins. This could negatively
affect earnings in the future due to the lower capture rate and tighter margins.

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2005
were $10.6 million, a 6% decrease over the 2004 amount of $11.3 million. The decrease was primarily due to the
absence in 2005 of $1.7 million marketing costs recorded in 2004 associated with the slowing Midwest business,
offset partially by a $0.9 million increase in payroll and incentive-related costs.

Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2003

Revenue. Mortgage and title operations revenue increased to $32.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2004
compared to $27.7 million in 2003. Mortgage operations revenue increased $3.1 million, due to several factors,
including a higher average loan amount ($216,000 in 2004 compared to $198,000 in 2003), along with increased
gains on mortgages and the sale of servicing rights and higher margins generated by certain mortgage products, such
as interest-only and low-down payment mortgage loans. The increase also reflects a $2.1 million change in estimate
related to marking interest rate lock commitments to market value in accordance with SFAS 133 and related
derivatives guidance. Title operations revenue increased $2.1 million due to the full year impact of the increase in
ownership percentage of certain title company operations in the fourth quarter of 2003. At December 31, 2004, M/I
Financial was operating in eight of our nine markets. In these eight markets, 83% of our homes delivered that were
financed were through M/I Financial.

General and Administrative Expenses. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2004
were $11.3 million, a 48.7% increase over the 2003 amount of $7.6 million. The increase was primarily due to $1.7
million increase in marketing costs associated with slowing Midwest business and $1.2 million increase in title
company general and administrative costs due to the increase in ownership percentage discussed above.

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

For the year ended December 31, 2005, our $263 million investment in land (excluding our acquisition of Shamrock
Homes and land purchased by our unconsolidated LLCs reported as investing activities) contributed to our $92.6
million operating cash outflow, despite our net income of $100.8 million. Partially offsetting this cash outflow was
$33.3 million provided by an increase in accounts payable and customer deposits resulting from our increased
backlog. For the year ended December 31, 2005, we used $64.1 million of cash through our investing activities,
which included $23.2 million (net of cash) for the acquisition of Shamrock Homes and $37.1 million of cash
invested in unconsolidated LLCs (net of returns of investment of $4.9 million). Some of these unconsolidated LLCs
also obtained outside financing that is not reflected in our borrowings – refer to Note 4 of our Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional discussion of borrowings by unconsolidated LLCs. For the year ended
December 31, 2005, our financing activities provided $179.5 million of cash, including $198.2 million of net
proceeds from our offering of $200 million 6.875% senior notes, the proceeds of which were used to pay down
existing bank borrowings under our revolving Credit Facility; however, during 2005, our revolving Credit Facility
subsequently increased as a result of funding additional land purchases.

Our financing needs depend on sales volume, asset turnover, land acquisition, inventory balances and growth
targets. We have incurred substantial indebtedness, and may incur substantial indebtedness in the future, to fund the
growth of our homebuilding activities. During 2006, we currently intend to purchase approximately $250 million of
land, funded by our existing $725 million Credit Facility that was increased to $735 million in February 2006 (with the
ability to increase such amount by an additional $15 million pursuant to an accordion feature). We continue to
purchase some lots from outside developers under agreements. However, we are strategically focusing on increasing
raw ground purchases to support our planned growth, and continue to evaluate potential new limited liability company
arrangements and business acquisitions on an opportunistic basis. We will continue to evaluate all of our alternatives to
satisfy our increasing demand for lots in the most cost-effective manner.

Our principal source of funds for construction and development activities has been from internally generated cash
and from bank borrowings, which are primarily unsecured. We believe that our available financing is adequate to
support operations through September 2008 when our Credit Facility expires; however, we continue to evaluate
various sources of funding to meet our long-term borrowing needs. Please refer to our discussion of Forward-
Looking Statements and Risk Factors in Item 1A for further discussion of risk factors that could impact our source
of funds.

Included in the table below is a summary of our available sources of cash as of December 31, 2005:

(In thousands)
Notes payable banks – homebuilding (a)
Notes payable bank – financial services
Senior notes
Universal shelf registration

Expiration
Date
9/26/2008
4/27/2006
4/1/2012
-

Outstanding
Balance

Available
Amount

$260,000
$ 46,000
$200,000
-

$134,600
$ 18,600

-
$150,000

(a) As of February 2006, the Credit Facility also provides for an additional $15 million of borrowing availability upon request by the Company
and approval by the applicable lenders included in the Credit Facility. Refer to Note 10 of our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Notes Payable Banks - Homebuilding. At December 31, 2005, the Company’s homebuilding operations had
borrowings totaling $260.0 million, financial letters of credit totaling $16.1 million and performance letters of credit
totaling $21.3 million outstanding under our amended and restated credit agreement, which was increased to $725
million in December 2005 and $735 million in February 2006 (the “Credit Facility”). Under the terms of the Credit
Facility, the $735 million capacity includes a maximum amount of $100 million in outstanding letters of credit. The
Credit Facility matures in September 2008. Borrowing availability is determined based on the lesser of: (1) Credit
Facility loan capacity less Credit Facility borrowings (including cash borrowings and letters of credit) or (2) lesser
of Credit Facility capacity and calculated borrowing base, less borrowing base indebtedness (including cash
borrowings under the Credit Facility, senior notes, financial letters of credit and the 10% commitment on the M/I
Financial credit agreement). As of December 31, 2005, the Credit Facility capacity was $725 million, compared to
the calculated borrowing base of $617.3 million; the borrowing base indebtedness was $482.7 million and the
resulting borrowing availability was $134.6 million. Borrowings under the Credit Facility are unsecured and are at
the Alternate Base Rate plus a margin ranging from zero to 37.5 basis points, or at the Eurodollar Rate plus a margin
ranging from 100 to 200 basis points. The Alternate Base Rate is defined as the higher of the Prime Rate, the Base
CD Rate plus 100 basis points, or the Federal Funds Rate plus 50 basis points. The Credit Facility also provides for
the ability to increase the loan capacity up to $750 million upon request by the Company and approval by the
lender(s). The Company is required under the Credit Facility to maintain a certain amount of tangible net worth, and

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

as of December 31, 2005, had approximately $155.0 million available for payment of dividends. As of December
31, 2005, the Company was in compliance with all restrictive covenants of the Credit Facility.

Note Payable Bank – Financial Services. At December 31, 2005, we had $46.0 million outstanding under the M/I
Financial loan agreement, which permits borrowings of $65.0 million to finance mortgage loans initially funded by
M/I Financial for our customers. The $65.0 million borrowing capacity represented a temporary increase in M/I
Financial’s loan agreement for the period December 15, 2005 through January 15, 2006 due to anticipated higher
borrowing needs at December 31, 2005. M/I Homes, Inc. and M/I Financial are co-borrowers under the M/I
Financial loan agreement. The agreement limits the borrowings to 95% of the aggregate face amount of certain
qualified mortgages and, as of December 31, 2005, the borrowing base was $64.6 million. Borrowings under the
M/I Financial credit agreement are at the Prime Rate or at the Eurodollar Rate plus a margin of 150 basis points.
The agreement expires in April 2006; however, the Company currently anticipates amending the term of the loan
agreement. As of December 31, 2005, the Company was in compliance with all restrictive covenants of the M/I
Financial loan agreement.

Senior Notes. At December 31, 2005, there were $200 million of 6.875% senior notes outstanding. The notes are
due April 2012. As of December 31, 2005, the Company was in compliance with all restrictive covenants of the
notes.

Universal Shelf Registration. In April 2002, we filed a $150 million universal shelf registration statement with the
SEC. Pursuant to the filing, we may, from time to time over an extended period, offer new debt and/or equity
securities. Of the equity shares, up to 1 million common shares may be sold by certain shareholders who are
considered selling shareholders. This shelf registration should allow us to expediently access capital markets in the
future. The timing and amount of offerings, if any, will depend on market and general business conditions. No debt or
equity securities have been offered for sale as of December 31, 2005.

Weighted Average Borrowings. For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003 our weighted average
borrowings outstanding were $425.2 million, $248.2 million and $134.7 million, respectively, with a weighted
average interest rate of 6.2%, 5.9% and 9.1%, respectively. The increase in borrowings was due to higher land
purchases and backlog. The increase in the weighted average interest rate from 2004 to 2005 was due the addition
of our 6.875% fixed rate senior notes in 2005, and the decrease in the weighted average interest rate from 2003 to
2004 resulted from termination of interest rate swaps during 2004.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

Included in the table below is a summary of future amounts payable under contractual obligations:

(In thousands)
Notes payable banks – homebuilding (a)
Note payable bank – financial services (b)
Mortgage notes payable (including interest)
Senior notes (including interest)
Obligation for consolidated inventory not owned (c)
Community development district obligations (d)
Operating leases
Purchase obligations (e)
Land option agreements (f)
Other long-term liabilities

Payments due by period

Total
$ 260,000
46,000
12,205
290,674
-
2,323
13,656
766,464
-
1,000

Less than
1 year
$ -
46,000
795
13,941
-
1,381
7,346
766,464
-
1,000

1 – 3 years

3 – 5 years

$260,000
-
1,591
27,920
-
942
4,903
-
-
-

$ -
-
1,591
27,882
-
-
941
-
-
-

More than
5 years
$ -
-
8,228
220,931
-
-
466
-
-
-

Total

$1,392,322

$836,927

$295,356

$30,414

$229,625

(a) Borrowings under the Credit Facility are unsecured and are at the Alternate Base Rate plus a margin ranging from zero to 37.5 basis points, or
at the Eurodollar Rate plus a margin ranging from 100 to 200 basis points. The Alternate Base Rate is defined as the higher of the Prime Rate,
the Base CD Rate plus 100 basis points, or the Federal Funds Rate plus 50 basis points. Borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2005 had a
weighted average interest rate of 5.803%. Interest payments by period will be based upon the outstanding borrowings and the applicable interest
rate(s) in effect. The above amounts do not reflect interest.

(b) Borrowings under the M/I Financial credit agreement are at the Prime Rate or at the Eurodollar Rate plus a margin of 150 basis points.
Borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2005 had a weighted average interest rate of 5.867%. Interest payments by period will be based upon
the outstanding borrowings and the applicable interest rate(s) in effect. The above amounts do not reflect interest.

(c) The Company is party to a land purchase option agreement to acquire developed lots from a seller who is a variable interest entity. The
Company has determined that it is the primary beneficiary of the variable interest entity, and therefore, is required under Financial Accounting
Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretation 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (“FIN 46”) to consolidate the entity. As of December
31, 2005, the Company has recorded a liability of $4.1 million relating to consolidation of this variable interest entity. The actual cash payments
that the Company will make in the future will be based upon the number of lots acquired each period and the related per lot prices in effect at that
time. Refer to Note 9 of our consolidated financial statements for further discussion of this obligation.

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

(d) The amount reported herein of $2.3 million represents principal and interest for a bond obligation incurred in connection with the acquisition
of lots in a community in Florida. This obligation will be repaid as the Company closes on the lot in this community to a third party and the
estimated payments by period above have been estimated based on the expected timing of closings. In addition, in connection with the
development of certain of the Company’s communities, local government entities have been established and bonds have been issued by those
entities to finance a portion of the related infrastructure. These community development district obligations represent obligations of the Company
as the current holder of the property, net of cash held by the district available to offset the particular bond obligations. As of December 31, 2005,
the Company has recorded a liability of $7.6 million relating to these community development district obligations; however, the actual cash
payments that the Company will ultimately make will be dependent upon the timing of the sale of those lots within the district to third parties and
we are unable to estimate the timing; therefore, the amounts have not been included above. Refer to Note 8 of our consolidated financial
statements for further discussion of these obligations.

(e) The Company has obligations with certain sub-contractors and suppliers of raw materials in the ordinary course of business to meet the
commitments to deliver 2,807 homes with an aggregate sales price of $954.0 million. Based on our current housing gross margin of 23.7% plus
variable selling costs of 4.0% of revenue, we estimate payments totaling approximately $766.5 million to be made in 2006 relating to those
homes.

(f) The Company has options and contingent purchase agreements to acquire land and developed lots with an aggregate purchase price of
approximately $452.6 million. Purchase of properties is generally contingent upon satisfaction of certain requirements by the Company and the
sellers and therefore the timing of payments under these agreements is not determinable. The Company has no specific performance obligations
with respect to these agreements.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

Our primary use of off-balance sheet arrangements is for the purpose of securing the most desirable lots on which to
build homes for our homebuyers in a manner that we believe reduces the overall risk to the Company. Our off-balance
sheet arrangements relating to our homebuilding operations include unconsolidated LLCs, land option agreements,
guaranties and indemnifications associated with acquiring and developing land and the issuance of letters of credit and
completion bonds. Additionally, in the ordinary course of business, our financial services operations issue guarantees
and indemnities relating to the sale of loans to third parties.

Unconsolidated Limited Liability Companies. In the ordinary course of business, the Company periodically enters
into arrangements with third parties to acquire land and develop lots. These arrangements include the creation by
the Company of LLCs, with the Company’s interest in these entities ranging from 33% to 50%. The entities
typically meet the criteria of variable interest entities, although certain of our LLCs do not meet the criteria of a
variable interest entity because the equity at risk is sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without
additional subordinated support from the equity investors and because these entities have outside financing that the
Company does not guarantee. We have determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of the variable interest
entities, and our ownership in each of the other LLCs is not in excess of 50%; therefore, our homebuilding LLCs are
recorded using the equity method of accounting. These entities engage in land development activities for the
purpose of distributing or selling developed lots to the Company and its partners in the entity. The Company
believes its maximum exposure related to any of these entities as of December 31, 2005 to be the amount invested of
$49.9 million plus our $4.5 million share of letters of credit totaling $9.7 million that serve as completion bonds for
the development work in progress. During 2006, we anticipate entering into additional LLCs in our higher growth,
higher investment markets, in order to increase our homebuilding activities in those markets, while sharing the risk
with our partner in each respective entity. In addition to our homebuilding LLCs, M/I Financial also owns a 49.9%
interest in one unconsolidated title insurance agency that engages in title and closing services for the Company.
Further details relating to our unconsolidated LLCs are included in Note 4 of our Consolidated Financial Statements.

Land Option Agreements. In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into land option agreements in
order to secure land for the construction of homes in the future. Pursuant to these land option agreements, the
Company will provide a deposit to the seller as consideration for the right to purchase land at different times in the
future, usually at predetermined prices. Because the entities holding the land under option often meet the criteria for
variable interest entities, the Company evaluates all land option agreements to determine if it is necessary to
consolidate any of these entities. The Company currently believes that its maximum exposure as of December 31,
2005 related to these agreements to be the amount of the Company’s outstanding deposits, which totaled $31.2
million, including cash deposits of $14.1 million, letters of credit of $13.8 million and corporate promissory notes of
$3.3 million. Further details relating to our land option agreements are included in Note 9 of our Consolidated
Financial Statements.

Letters of Credit and Completion Bonds. The Company provides standby letters of credit and completion bonds for
development work in progress, deposits on land and lot purchase agreements and miscellaneous deposits. As of
December 31, 2005, the Company has outstanding approximately $158.3 million of completion bonds and standby
letters of credit, including those related to LLCs and land option agreements discussed above.

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

Guarantees and Indemnities. In the ordinary course of business, M/I Financial enters into agreements that guaranty
purchasers of its mortgage loans that M/I Financial will repurchase a loan if certain conditions occur. M/I Financial
has also provided indemnifications to certain third party investors and insurers in lieu of repurchasing certain loans.
The risk associated with the guarantees and indemnities above is offset by the value of the underlying assets, and the
Company accrues its best estimate of the probable loss on these loans. Additionally, the Company has provided
certain other guarantees and indemnities in connection with the acquisition and development of land by our
homebuilding operations. Refer to Note 5 of our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details relating to
our guarantees and indemnities.

INTEREST RATES AND INFLATION

Our business is significantly affected by general economic conditions of the United States of America and, particularly,
by the impact of interest rates. Higher interest rates may decrease our potential market by making it more difficult for
homebuyers to qualify for mortgages or to obtain mortgages at interest rates that are acceptable to them. The impact of
increased rates can be offset, in part, by offering variable rate loans with lower interest rates.

In conjunction with our mortgage financing services, hedging methods are used to reduce our exposure to interest rate
fluctuations between the commitment date of the loan and the time the loan closes.

In recent years, we have generally been able to raise prices by amounts at least equal to our cost increases and,
accordingly, have not experienced any detrimental effect from inflation; however, in 2006, we may not be able to raise
prices by amounts equal to our cost increases and may experience lower gross margins. When we develop lots for our
own use, inflation may increase our profits because land costs are fixed well in advance of sales efforts. We are
generally able to maintain costs with subcontractors from the date construction is started on a home through the
delivery date. However, in certain situations, unanticipated costs may occur between the time of start and the delivery
date, resulting in lower gross profit margins.

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our primary market risk results from fluctuations in interest rates. We are exposed to interest rate risk through the
borrowings under our unsecured revolving credit facilities that permit borrowings up to $790 million as of
December 31, 2005, subject to availability constraints. Subsequent to December 31, 2005, the $790 million has
been adjusted to $775 million as a result of the elimination of $25 million temporary increase in M/I Financial’s
credit agreement and the addition of $10 million to the Company’s Credit Facility. Additionally, M/I Financial is
exposed to interest rate risk associated with its mortgage loan origination services.

Interest rate lock commitments (“IRLCs”) are extended to home-buying customers who have applied for mortgages
and who meet certain defined credit and underwriting criteria. Typically, the IRLCs will have a duration of less than
nine months; however, in certain markets, the duration could extend to twelve months. Some IRLCs are committed
to a specific third-party investor through use of best-effort whole loan delivery commitments matching the exact
terms of the IRLC loan. The notional amount of the committed IRLCs and the best efforts contracts was $52.8
million and $109.9 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. At December 31, 2005, the fair value of
the committed IRLCs resulted in a liability of $0.6 million and the related best efforts contracts resulted in an asset
of $0.6 million. At December 31, 2004, the fair value of the committed IRLCs resulted in a liability of $0.7 million
and the fair value of the related best efforts contracts resulted in an offsetting asset of $0.7 million. For the year
ended December 31, 2005, we recognized less than $0.1 million expense relating to marking these committed IRLCs
to market, whereas in 2004 and 2003 there was no net gain or loss. Uncommitted IRLCs are considered derivative
instruments under SFAS 133 and are fair value adjusted, with the resulting gain or loss recorded in current earnings.
At December 31, 2005 and 2004, the notional amount of the uncommitted IRLC loans was $32.1 million and $32.5
million, respectively. The fair value adjustment related to these commitments, which is based on quoted market
prices, resulted in a $0.3 million liability and $0.1 million asset at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. For
the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, we recognized $0.4 million expense, $2.6 million income and
$3.0 million expense, respectively, relating to marking these commitments to market.

Forward sales of mortgage-backed securities (“FMBSs”) are used to protect uncommitted IRLC loans against the
risk of changes in interest rates between the lock date and the funding date. FMBSs related to uncommitted IRLCs
are classified and accounted for as non-designated derivative instruments, with gains and losses recorded in current
earnings. Immediately prior to or concurrent with funding uncommitted IRLC loans, we enter into a commitment
with a third party investor to buy the specific IRLC loan. At December 31, 2005, the notional amount under the
FMBSs was $33.0 million, and the related fair value adjustment, which is based on quoted market prices, resulted in
a liability of $0.2 million. At December 31, 2004, the notional amount under the FMBSs was $35.0 million, and the
related fair value adjustment resulted in a less than a $0.1 million liability. For the years ended December 31, 2005,
2004 and 2003, we recognized $0.2 million expense, $0.3 million income and $1.0 million income, respectively,
relating to marking these FMBSs to market.

The following table provides the expected future cash flows and current fair values of our other assets and liabilities
that are subject to market risk as interest rates fluctuate, as December 31, 2005:

(Dollars in thousands)
ASSETS:
Mortgage loans held for sale:
Fixed rate
Variable rate

LIABILITIES:
Long-term debt – fixed rate
Long-term debt – variable rate

Weighted
Average
Interest
Rate

Expected Cash Flows by Period

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

Thereafter

Total

Fair
Value
12/31/05

6.10%
5.34%

$45,229
24,243

$ -
-

$ 45,229
24,243

$ 43,589
23,827

6.92%
5.81%

$ 222
46,000

$240
-

$ 261
260,000

$283
-

$306
-

$205,853
-

$207,165
306,000

$187,342
306,000

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Directors of M/I Homes, Inc.
Columbus, Ohio

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of M/I Homes, Inc. and its subsidiaries (“the
Company”) as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’
equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005. These consolidated
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
M/I Homes, Inc. and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the results of their operations and their
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States), the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based
on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 28, 2006 expressed an unqualified
opinion on management’s assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting
and an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP

Columbus, Ohio
February 28, 2006

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

M/I HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Revenue
Costs and expenses:
Land and housing
General and administrative
Selling
Interest

Total costs and expenses

Income before income taxes

Provision for income taxes

Net income

Earnings per common share:
Basic
Diluted

Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic
Diluted

Year Ended December 31,

2005

2004

2003

$1,347,646

$1,174,635

$1,068,493

1,007,523
80,657
83,931
14,108

1,186,219

875,614
64,954
74,428
8,342

1,023,338

161,427

151,297

60,642

59,763

801,532
58,552
68,479
4,831

933,394

135,099

53,369

$ 100,785

$ 91,534

$ 81,730

$ 7.05
$ 6.93

$ 6.49
$ 6.35

$ 5.66
$ 5.51

14,302
14,539

14,107
14,407

14,428
14,825

Dividends per common share

$ 0.10

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

M/I HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Dollars in thousands, except par values)

ASSETS:
Cash
Cash held in escrow
Mortgage loans held for sale
Inventories
Property and equipment - net
Investment in unconsolidated limited liability companies
Other assets
TOTAL ASSETS

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:

LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable
Accrued compensation
Customer deposits
Other liabilities
Community development district obligations
Obligation for consolidated inventory not owned
Notes payable banks – homebuilding operations
Note payable bank – financial services operations
Mortgage notes payable
Senior notes – net of discount of $1,600
TOTAL LIABILITIES

Commitments and contingencies

December 31,

2005

2004

$ 25,085

31,823
67,416
1,076,132
34,507
49,929
44,786
$1,329,678

$ 73,705
26,817
35,581
75,528
9,822
4,092
260,000
46,000
7,165
198,400
737,110

$ 2,351
21,731
67,918
798,486
33,306
23,093
31,641
$978,526

$ 50,447
25,462
24,302
63,345
5,057
4,932
279,000
30,000
8,370
-
490,915

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred shares – $.01 par value; authorized 2,000,000 shares; none outstanding
Common shares – $.01 par value; authorized 38,000,000 shares; issued 17,626,123 shares
Additional paid-in capital
Retained earnings
Treasury shares – at cost – 3,298,858 and 3,440,489 shares, respectively, at December 31, 2005 and 2004
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

-
176
72,470
576,726
(56,804)
592,568

-
176
69,073
477,370
(59,008)
487,611

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

$1,329,678

$978,526

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

M/I HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Balance at December 31, 2002
Net income
Dividends to shareholders, $0.10 per common share
Income tax benefit from stock options and executive
deferred stock distributions
Purchase of treasury shares
Stock options exercised
Deferral of executive and director compensation
Executive deferred stock distributions
Balance at December 31, 2003
Net income
Dividends to shareholders, $0.10 per common share
Income tax benefit from stock options and executive
deferred stock distributions
Purchase of treasury shares
Stock options exercised
Deferral of executive and director compensation
Executive deferred stock distributions
Balance at December 31, 2004
Net income
Dividends to shareholders, $0.10 per common share
Income tax benefit from stock options and executive
deferred stock distributions
Purchase of treasury shares
Stock options exercised
Deferral of executive and director compensation
Executive deferred stock distributions
Balance at December 31, 2005

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Common Shares

Shares
Outstanding
14,791,419
-
-

-
(732,700)
118,960
-
54,256
14,231,935
-
-

-
(299,400)
139,080
-
114,019
14,185,634
-
-

-
(9,800)
128,470
-
22,961
14,327,265

Amount

$176
-
-

-
-
-
-
-
$176
-
-

-
-
-
-
-
$176

Additional
Paid-In
Capital
$65,079
-
-

Treasury
Stock

Retained
Earnings
$306,970 $(32,496)
81,730
(1,450)

-
-

1,505
-
280
880
(718)
$67,026
-
-

-
-
(21,892)
-
1,627
-
-
-
-
718
$387,250 $(52,043)
91,534
(1,414)

-
-

Total
Shareholders’
Equity
$339,729
81,730
(1,450)

1,505
(21,892)
1,907
880
-
$ 402,409
91,534
(1,414)

2,830
-
284
870
(1,937)
$ 69,073
-
-

-
-
(11,261)
-
2,359
-
-
-
-
1,937
$477,370 $(59,008)
100,785
(1,429)

-
-

2,830
(11,261)
2,643
870
-
$487,611
100,785
(1,429)

1,750
-
1,062
979
(394)
$72,470

-
-
-
(392)
-
2,202
-
-
394
-
$576,726 $(56,804)

1,750
(392)
3,264
979
-
$592,568

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

M/I HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:

Net income

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Loss from property disposals
Depreciation
Amortization of intangibles, debt discount and debt issue costs
Deferred income tax expense
Income tax benefit from stock transactions
Equity in undistributed (income) loss of limited liability companies
Write-off of unamortized debt discount and financing costs
Change in assets and liabilities, net of effect from acquisition:
Cash held in escrow
Mortgage loans held for sale
Inventories
Other assets
Accounts payable
Customer deposits
Accrued compensation
Other liabilities
Net cash used in operating activities

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:

Purchase of property and equipment
Acquisition, net of cash acquired
Investment in unconsolidated limited liability companies
Return of investment from unconsolidated limited liability companies

Net cash used in investing activities

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

(Repayments of) proceeds from bank borrowings – net
Principal repayments of mortgage notes payable and community development
district bond obligations
Redemption of senior notes
Proceeds from senior notes – net of discount of $1,774
Debt issue costs
Dividends paid
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
Payments to acquire treasury shares
Net cash provided by financing activities
Net increase (decrease) in cash
Cash balance at beginning of year
Cash balance at end of year

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:

Cash paid during the period for:

Interest – net of amount capitalized
Income taxes

2005

$100,785

35
2,705
1,793
557
1,750
(39)
-

(10,092)
502
(228,079)
(2,713)
22,325
10,964
1,116
5,752
(92,639)

Year Ended December 31,
2004

$91,534

212
2,448
-
2,490
2,830
157
580

(12,156)
(1,989)
(159,605)
(3,180)
(4,317)
2,994
(1,042)
1,356
(77,688)

(3,845)
(23,185)
(41,972)

4,878

(64,124)

(1,684)
-
(19,371)
451
(20,604)

2003

$81,730

4
2,382
-
6,862
1,505
(1,615)
-

(9,194)
(11,788)
(122,486)
(4,638)
5,005
4,219
3,291
5,943
(38,780)

(15,743)
-
(12,462)
2,480
(25,725)

(15,402)

190,000

90,200

(542)
-
198,226
(4,228)
(1,429)
3,264
(392)
179,497
22,734
2,351

$ 25,085

(29,944)
(50,000)
-
(1,924)
(1,414)
2,643
(11,261)
98,100
(192)
2,543
$ 2,351

(2,044)
-
-
-
(1,450)
1,907
(21,892)
66,721
2,216
327
$ 2,543

$ 8,247
$ 51,347

$ 7,664
$55,029

$ 9,530
$41,420

NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS DURING THE PERIOD:

Community development district infrastructure
Consolidated inventory not owned
Mortgage notes payable and community development district bond obligations in
connection with land acquisition – net
Distribution of single-family lots from unconsolidated limited liability companies
Non-monetary exchange of fixed assets
Deferral of executive and director compensation
Executive and director deferred stock distributions

$ 2,577
$ (840)
$ 1,525

$ 10,297
$ -
$ 979
$ 394

ACQUISITION:

Fair market value of assets acquired, net of cash acquired
Goodwill
Fair market value of liabilities assumed
Cash paid

$ 42,923
1,561
(21,299)
$ 23,185

$ 5,057
$ 4,932
$27,700

$ 9,622
$ -
$ 870
$ 1,937

$ -
-
-
$ -

$ -
$ -
$ -

$17,978
$ 7,816
$ 880
$ 718

$ -
-
-
$ -

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

M/I HOMES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Business. M/I Homes, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company” or “we”) is engaged primarily in the construction
and sale of single-family residential property in Columbus and Cincinnati, Ohio; Tampa, Orlando and West Palm
Beach, Florida; Charlotte and Raleigh, North Carolina; Indianapolis, Indiana; Delaware; and the Virginia and
Maryland suburbs of Washington, D.C. During 2005, the Company expanded its’ Washington, D.C. operations into
Delaware and expanded our Orlando operations through the acquisition of Shamrock Homes, located in Tavares,
Florida. The Company designs, sells and builds single-family homes on finished lots, which it develops or
purchases ready for home construction. The Company also purchases undeveloped land to develop into finished lots
for future construction of single-family homes and, on a limited basis, for sale to others. Our homebuilding
operations, operated across several geographic regions in the United States, have similar characteristics; therefore,
they have been aggregated into one reportable segment, the homebuilding segment.

The Company conducts mortgage financing activities through M/I Financial Corp. (“M/I Financial”) that originates
mortgage loans for purchasers of the Company’s homes. The loans and the servicing rights are sold to outside
mortgage lenders. The Company and M/I Financial also have investments in title insurance agencies that provide
title services to purchasers of the Company’s homes; one of these investments is accounted for using the equity
method (see Note 4). In addition, in late 2005 we formed M/I Insurance Agency, LLC, a majority-owned subsidiary
that will collect commissions as a broker of property and casualty insurance policies. As a broker, the Company will
not retain any risk associated with these insurance policies. Our mortgage banking, title service and insurance
activities have similar characteristics; therefore, they have been aggregated into one reportable segment, the
financial services segment.

Principles of Consolidation. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of M/I
Homes, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Accounting Principles. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). All intercompany
transactions have been eliminated. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents. All highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or
less are considered to be cash equivalents. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, the majority of cash was held in one
bank.

Cash Held in Escrow. Cash held in escrow represents cash relating to loans closed at year-end that were not yet
funded to the Company as of December 31st due to timing, and cash that was deposited in an escrow account at the
time of closing on homes to homebuyers which will be released to the Company when the related work is completed
on each home, which generally occurs within six months of closing on the home.

Mortgage Loans Held for Sale. Mortgage loans held for sale consists primarily of single-family residential loans
collateralized by the underlying property. Generally, all of the mortgage loans and related servicing rights are sold
to third-party investors within two weeks of origination. Refer to the Revenue Recognition policy for additional
discussion.

Inventories. We use the specific identification method for the purpose of accumulating costs associated with home
construction. Inventories are recorded at cost, unless they are determined to be impaired, in which case the impaired
inventories are written down to fair value less cost to sell in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (“SFAS”) No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS 144”). In
addition to the costs of direct land acquisition, land development and related costs (both incurred and estimated to be
incurred) and home construction costs, inventories include capitalized interest, real estate taxes and certain indirect
costs incurred during land development and home construction. Such costs are charged to cost of sales simultaneous
with revenue recognition, as discussed below. When a home is closed, we typically have not yet paid all incurred
costs necessary to complete the home. As homes close, we compare the home construction budget to actual
recorded costs to date to estimate the additional costs to be incurred from our subcontractors related to the home.
We record a liability and a corresponding charge to cost of sales for the amount we estimate will ultimately be paid

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

related to that home. We monitor the accuracy of such estimate by comparing actual costs incurred in subsequent
months to the estimate. Although actual costs to complete in the future could differ from the estimate, our method
has historically produced consistently accurate estimates of actual costs to complete closed homes.

The summary of inventory is as follows:

(In thousands)
Single-family lots, land and land development costs
Houses under construction
Model homes and furnishings - at cost (less accumulated depreciation: December 31, 2005 - $211;

December 31, 2004 - $156)

Community development district infrastructure (Note 8)
Land purchase deposits
Consolidated inventory not owned (Note 9)
Total inventory

December 31,
2005
$ 754,530
294,363

1,455
7,634
14,058
4,092
$1,076,132

December 31,
2004
$553,237
226,789

1,351
5,058
7,119
4,932
$798,486

Single-family lots, land and land development costs include raw land that the Company has purchased to develop
into lots, costs incurred to develop the raw land into lots and lots for which development has been completed but
have not yet been sold or committed to a third party for construction of a home.

Houses under construction include homes that are finished and ready for delivery and homes in various stages of
construction.

Model homes and furnishings include homes that are under construction or have been completed and are being used
as sales models. The amount also includes the net book value of furnishings included in our model homes.
Depreciation on model home furnishings is recorded using an accelerated method over the estimated useful life of
the assets, typically seven years.

Land purchase deposits include both refundable and non-refundable amounts paid to third party sellers relating to
the purchase of land.

Capitalized Interest. The Company capitalizes interest during land development and home construction.
Capitalized interest is charged to cost of sales as the related inventory is delivered to a third party. The summary of
capitalized interest is as follows:

(In thousands)
Capitalized interest, beginning of year
Interest capitalized to inventory
Capitalized interest charged to cost of sales
Capitalized interest, end of year

Interest incurred

2005
$15,289
12,208
(8,264)
$19,233

$26,316

Year Ended December 31,
2004
$14,094
6,416
(5,221)
$15,289

2003

$11,475
7,425
(4,806)
$14,094

$14,758

$12,256

Investment in Unconsolidated Limited Liability Companies. We invest in entities that acquire and develop land for
distribution or sale to us in connection with our homebuilding operations. Certain of these entities have been
determined to meet the criteria of variable interest entities because they lack sufficient equity to finance their
operations, and we must use our judgment to determine if we are the primary beneficiary of the entity. Certain of
these entities have been determined to not meet the criteria of variable interest entities because they have sufficient
equity and have obtained outside financing, and we must use our judgment to determine if we have a controlling
interest in the entity. Factors considered in determining whether we have significant influence or we have control
include risk and reward sharing, experience and financial condition of the other partners, voting rights, involvement
in day-to-day capital and operating decisions and continuing involvement. Based on the application of our
accounting policies, these entities are accounted for by the equity method of accounting.

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

Property and Equipment. The Company records property and equipment at cost and subsequently depreciates the
assets using both straight-line and accelerated methods. Following are the major classes of depreciable assets and
their estimated useful lives:

December 31,

(In thousands)
Land, building and improvements
Office furnishings, leasehold improvements, computer equipment and computer software
Transportation and construction equipment
Property and equipment
Accumulated depreciation
Property and equipment, net

2005
$11,824
11,433
22,520
45,777
(11,270)
$34,507

Building and improvements
Office furnishings, leasehold improvements and computer equipment
Transportation and construction equipment

2004
$11,824
8,181
22,497
42,502
(9,196)
$33,306

Estimated
Useful Lives
35 years
3-7 years
5-20 years

Depreciation expense was $2.7 million, $2.4 million and $2.4 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Impairment of Long Lived Assets. Annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances change, a determination
is made by management to ascertain whether single-family lots, land and land development costs and property and
equipment have been impaired based on the sum of expected future undiscounted cash flows from operating
activities. If the estimated net cash flows are less than the carrying amount of such assets, the Company will
recognize an impairment loss in the amount necessary to write down the assets to a fair value as determined from
expected future discounted cash flows. We assess assets for recoverability in accordance with SFAS 144.

Other Assets. Other assets includes certificates of deposit of $0.4 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, which
have been pledged as collateral for mortgage loans sold to third parties and, therefore, are restricted from general
use. The certificates of deposit will be released after a minimum of five years, and when there is a 95% loan to
value on the related loans and there have been no late payments by the mortgagor in the last twelve months. Other
Assets also include intangible assets, goodwill, non-trade receivables, deposits, prepaid expenses and deferred taxes.

Other Liabilities. Other liabilities include taxes payable, accrued self-insurance costs, accrued warranty expenses
and various other miscellaneous accrued expenses.

Guarantees and Indemnities. Guarantee and indemnity liabilities are established by charging the applicable
balance sheet or income statement line, depending on the nature of the guarantee or indemnity, and crediting a
liability. M/I Financial provides a limited-life guarantee on loans sold to certain third parties, and estimates its
liability related to the guarantee, and any indemnities subsequently provided to the purchaser of the loans in lieu of
loan repurchase, based on historical loss experience. The Company has also provided certain other guaranties and
including environmental
indemnifications
indemnifications, guaranties of the completion of land development and minimum net worth guaranties of certain
subsidiaries. The Company estimates these liabilities based on the estimated cost of insurance coverage or estimated
cost of acquiring a bond in the amount of the exposure. Actual future costs associated with these guaranties and
indemnifications could differ materially from our current estimated amounts.

the purchase and development of

in connection with

land,

Segment Information. Our reportable business segments consist of homebuilding and financial services. Our
homebuilding segment derives a majority of its revenue from constructing single-family homes in nine markets in
the United States. The financial services segment generates revenue by originating and selling mortgages and by
collecting fees for title services. Segment information included herein is presented in accordance with SFAS No.
131, “Disclosure about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information” (“SFAS 131”), and is presented on the
basis that the chief operating decision makers use in evaluating segment performance. During the fourth quarter of
2005, the Company’s chief operating decision makers made a decision to change how the total business was viewed
to include corporate and other, previously shown separately within the Company’s segment reporting, within the
homebuilding segment. The chief operating decision makers made this change because they believe this is a better
way to view the Company’s results, and will also provide more comparable information with the homebuilding
industry. As required under SFAS 131, the Company has restated all prior period segment information to be
consistent with the 2005 segment reporting.

Revenue Recognition. Revenue from the sale of a home is recognized when the closing has occurred, title has
passed and an adequate initial and continuing investment by the homebuyer is received or the loan has been sold to a
third party investor in accordance with SFAS No. 66, “Accounting for Sales of Real Estate.” Revenue for homes

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

that close to the buyer having a deposit of 5% or greater, and all home closings insured under Federal Housing
Authority (“FHA”) or Veterans Administration (“VA”) government-insured programs, are recorded in the financial
statements on the date of closing. Revenue related to all other home closings is recorded on the date that M/I
Financial sells the loan to a third party investor, because the receivable from the third party investor is not subject to
future subordination and the Company has transferred to this investor the usual risks and rewards of ownership that
is in substance a sale and does not have a substantial continuing involvement with the home, in accordance with
SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities.”
All associated homebuilding costs are charged to cost of sales in the period when the revenue from home closings
are recognized. Homebuilding costs include land and land development costs, home construction costs (including
an estimate of the costs to complete construction), previously capitalized indirect costs and estimated warranty costs.
All other costs are expensed as incurred.

We recognize the majority of the revenue associated with our mortgage loan operations when the mortgage loans
and related servicing rights are sold to third party investors. We defer the application and origination fees, net of
costs, and recognize them as revenue, along with the associated gains or losses on the sale of the loans and related
servicing rights, when the loans are sold to third party investors in accordance with SFAS No. 91, “Accounting for
Nonrefundable Fees and Costs Associated with Originating or Acquiring Loans.” The revenue recognized is
reduced by the fair value of the related guarantee provided to the investor. The guarantee fair value is recognized in
revenue when the Company is released from its obligation under the guarantee. Generally, all of the financial
services mortgage loans and related servicing rights are sold to third party investors within two weeks of origination.
We recognize financial services revenue associated with our title operations as homes are closed, closing services
are rendered and title polices are issued, all of which generally occur simultaneously as each home is closed. All of
the underwriting risk associated with title insurance policies is transferred to third party insurers.

Warranty Cost. The Company generally provides a two-year limited warranty on materials and workmanship and a
thirty-year limited warranty against major structural defects. Warranty liabilities are established by charging cost of
sales and crediting a warranty liability for each home closed. The amounts charged are estimated by management to
be adequate to cover expected warranty-related costs for materials and labor required under the Company’s warranty
programs. Reserves for warranties under our two-year limited warranty program and our 20-year (pre-1998) and 30-
year structural warranty program are established as a percentage of average sales price and on a per unit basis,
respectively, and are based upon historical experience by geographic area and recent trends. Factors that are given
consideration in determining the reserves include: 1) the historical range of amounts paid per average sales price on
a home; 2) type and mix of amenity packages added to the home; 3) any warranty expenditures included in the
above not considered to be normal and recurring; 4) timing of payments; 5) improvements in quality of construction
expected to impact future warranty expenditures; 6) actuarial estimates prepared by an independent third party,
which considers both Company and industry data; and 7) conditions that may affect certain projects and require a
higher percentage of average sales price for those specific projects.

Changes in estimates for pre-existing warranties occur due to changes in the historical payment experience, and are
also due to differences between the actual payment pattern experienced during the period and the historical payment
pattern used in our evaluation of the warranty reserve balance at the end of each quarter. Warranty expense was
$10.8 million, $14.5 million and $11.5 million for 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. See also Note 5.

Amortization of Debt Issuance Costs. The costs incurred in connection with the issuance of debt are being
amortized over the terms of the related debt. Unamortized debt issuance costs of $5.1 million and $1.8 million are
included in other assets at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

Advertising and Research and Development. The Company expenses advertising and research and development
costs as incurred. The Company expensed $10.1 million, $10.1 million and $10.0 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, for advertising and expensed $3.5 million, $2.5 million and $1.6 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, for research and development.

Earnings Per Share. Earnings per share is calculated based on the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the year. The difference between basic and diluted shares outstanding is due to the effect of
dilutive stock options and deferred stock. These are no adjustments to net income necessary in the calculation of
basic or diluted earnings per share. The number of antidilutive options that require exclusion from the computation
of diluted earnings per share is summarized in the table below.

(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Basic weighted average shares outstanding
Effect of dilutive securities:
Stock option awards
Deferred compensation awards
Diluted average shares outstanding

Three Months Ended

Twelve Months Ended

December 31,
2005

December 31,
2004

14,333

85
120
14,538

14,141

130
141
14,412

December 31,
2005
14,302

December 31,
2004
14,107

119
118
14,539

141
159
14,407

Net income

$41,315

$24,549

$100,785

$91,534

Earnings per share
Basic
Diluted
Anti-dilutive options not included in the
calculation of diluted earnings per share

$ 2.88
$ 2.84

$ 1.74
$ 1.70

$ 7.05
$ 6.93

484,600

246,666

$ 6.49
$ 6.35

Profit Sharing. The Company has a deferred profit-sharing plan that covers substantially all Company employees
and permits members to make contributions to the plan on a pre-tax salary basis in accordance with the provisions of
Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Company contributions to the plan are made at the discretion of the
Company’s Board of Directors and totaled $2.7 million $2.3 million and $2.2 million for 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively.

Deferred Stock Plans. Effective November 1, 1998, the Company adopted the Executives’ Deferred Compensation
Plan (the “Executive Plan”), a non-qualified deferred compensation stock plan. The purpose of the Executive Plan
is to provide an opportunity for certain eligible employees of the Company to defer a portion of their compensation
to invest in the Company’s common stock. Compensation expense deferred in the plan, plus accrued dividends
related to the Executive Plan, totaled approximately $0.7 million in each of the years 2005, 2004 and 2003.

In 1997, the Company adopted the Director Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Director Plan”) to provide its
directors with an opportunity to defer their director compensation and to invest in the Company’s common stock.
Compensation expense deferred in the Director Plan, plus accrued dividends related to the Director Plan, totaled
$0.3 million, $0.2 million and $0.2 million in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively.

Stock-Based Employee Compensation. The Company accounts for its Stock Incentive Plan, which is described
more fully in Note 14, under the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”)

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations. No stock-based employee
compensation cost is reflected in net income, as all options granted under those plans have an exercise price equal to
the market value of the underlying common shares on the date of grant. The following table illustrates the effect on
net income and earnings per share as if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No.
123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation,” to stock-based employee compensation.

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net income, as reported
Deduct: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair
value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects
Pro forma net income

Earnings per share:
Basic – as reported
Basic – pro forma

Diluted – as reported
Diluted – pro forma

Year Ended December 31,
2004
$91,534

2005
$100,785

2003
$81,730

1,877
$ 98,908

721
$90,813

885
$80,845

$ 7.05
$ 6.92

$ 6.93
$ 6.80

$ 6.49
$ 6.44

$ 6.35
$ 6.30

$ 5.66
$ 5.60

$ 5.51
$ 5.45

Reclassifications. Certain amounts in the 2004 Consolidated Balance Sheet and the 2003 and 2004 Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows have been reclassified to conform to the 2005 presentation. The Company believes these
reclassifications are immaterial to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Impact of New Accounting Standards. In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”), which is a revision of SFAS 123.
The statement supersedes APB Opinion No. 25 and SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation –
Transition and Disclosure – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123.” The statement also amends SFAS No. 95,
“Statement of Cash Flows.” The statement requires the cost resulting from all share-based payment transactions be
recognized in the financial statements. SFAS 123(R) establishes fair value as the measurement objective in
accounting for share-based payment arrangements and requires all entities to apply a fair value based measurement
method in accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees. SFAS 123(R) applies to all awards
granted or that vest after the required effective date (the beginning of the first annual reporting period that begins
after June 15, 2005 in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s delay of the original effective
date of SFAS 123(R)) and to awards modified, repurchased or canceled after that date. As a result, beginning
January 1, 2006, the Company will adopt SFAS 123(R) and begin reflecting the stock option expense determined
under fair value based methods in our Consolidated Statement of Income rather than as pro forma disclosure in the
notes to the financial statements.

In March 2005, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued Staff Accounting Bulletin Number 107
that provided additional guidance to public companies relating to share-based payment transactions and the
implementation of SFAS 123(R), including guidance regarding valuation methods and related assumptions,
classification of compensation expense and income tax effects of share-based payment arrangements.

The Company has completed its assessment of the impact of FAS123(R), and estimates the after tax impact in 2006
to be approximately $3.0 million ($0.21 per share).

NOTE 2. Acquisition

During the third quarter of 2005, the Company expanded its homebuilding operations in Florida through the
acquisition of certain assets and assumption of certain liabilities of Shamrock Homes, Inc. (“Shamrock”), located in
Tavares, Florida. In connection with this acquisition, the Company paid $39.7 million, including the payoff of debt
assumed in the acquisition, and net of cash acquired. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase; accordingly,
the purchase price was allocated to reflect the fair value of assets acquired, including $6.5 million of intangible
assets, and liabilities assumed. Intangible assets consist of the Shamrock name, with a fair value of $5.7 million
being amortized over an expected life of five years; house plans with a fair value of $0.5 million being amortized
over an expected life of two years; and land options with a fair value of $0.3 million that were reclassified to land
when the related land was purchased. Amortization expense associated with the above intangible assets totaled $0.7
million in 2005, and is estimated to range from $1.1 million to $1.4 million annually during each of the next five
years. In connection with the acquisition, the Company recorded goodwill of $1.6 million, which we believe will be
fully deductible for tax purposes. The results of operations of Shamrock are included in the Company’s results of
operations since the acquisition date of July 1, 2005. The pro forma effect of the Shamrock acquisition on the
results of operations is not presented as the effect is not material.

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

NOTE 3. Transactions with Related Parties

During 2005, 2004 and 2003, the Company sold land for approximately $0.4 million, $0.6 million and $0.2 million,
respectively, to an entity owned by a related party of one of the Company’s executive officers. In January 2003, the
Company purchased land for approximately $2.2 million that was under the control of a related party entity, owned
by a then employee of the Company. These transactions were ratified by the independent members of the Board of
Directors. In addition, during 2005 the Company paid $0.4 million to a related party for the assignment of a land
purchase agreement to the Company.

The Company made payments in the normal course of business totaling $2.7 million, $2.6 million and $1.8 million
during 2005, 2004 and 2003 to a construction subcontractor who is a related party, for work performed in
construction of certain of our homes. The Company also leased model homes from various related parties, and
made payments totaling approximately $0.4 million, $0.8 million and $0.9 million during 2005, 2004 and 2003 for
the use of those homes as sales models.

The Company made contributions totaling $0.8 million, $2.0 million and $2.5 million during 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, to the M/I Homes Foundation, a charitable organization having certain officers, directors and
shareholders of the Company on its Board of Trustees.

As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company had receivables totaling $1.0 million and $0.9 million,
respectively, due from executive officers or related party entities, relating to amounts owed to the Company for
split-dollar life insurance policy premiums. The Company will collect the receivable either directly from the
executive officer, if employment terminates other than by death, or from the executive officer’s beneficiary, if
employment terminates due to death of the executive officer. The receivables are recorded in Other Assets on the
consolidated balance sheets.

NOTE 4. Investment in Unconsolidated Limited Liability Companies

Homebuilding Limited Liability Companies. At December 31, 2005, the Company had interests varying from 33%
to 50% in limited liability companies (“LLCs”) that have been determined to meet the criteria of variable interest
entities that engage in land development activities for the purpose of developed lot distribution to the Company and
its partners in the entity. The Company receives its percentage interest in the lots developed in the form of a capital
distribution. These entities do not have long-term debt recorded on their balance sheets. The Company’s maximum
exposure related to its investment in these entities as of December 31, 2005 is the amount invested of $32.1 million
plus letters of credit of $8.9 million (of which the Company’s proportionate share is $3.7 million), which serve as
completion bonds for development work in process by the entities. Included in the Company’s investment in LLCs
at December 31, 2005 and 2004 are $0.3 million of capitalized interest and other costs. The Company received
distributions totaling $10.3 million, $9.6 million and $18.0 million in developed lots at cost in 2005, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. The Company has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of these variable interest entities;
therefore, these entities are recorded using the equity method of accounting.

At December 31, 2005, the Company also had 50% interests in certain LLCs that engage in land development
activities for the purpose of selling developed lots to the Company and its partners in the entity. These LLCs do not
meet the criteria of variable interest entities because each of the entities have sufficient equity at risk to permit the
entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated support from the equity investors and as a result of
outside financing that is not guaranteed by the Company. The Company and its partner in each of these entities has
provided the lender environmental indemnifications and guaranties of the completion of land development as more
fully described in Note 5 below. The Company’s maximum exposure related to its investment in these entities as of
December 31, 2005 is the amount invested of $17.8 million plus letters of credit of $0.8 million and the obligation
under the guaranties and indemnifications. Included in the Company’s investment in these LLCs at December 31,
2005 is $0.3 million of capitalized interest and other costs; there were no capitalized interest and other costs at
December 31, 2004. The Company has not purchased any lots from these entities during 2005, 2004 or 2003. The
Company does not have a controlling interest in these LLCs; therefore, they are recorded using the equity method of
accounting.

Summarized condensed combined financial information for the LLCs that are included in the homebuilding segment
as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 is as
follows:

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

Summarized Condensed Combined Balance Sheets:

(In thousands)
Assets:
Single-family lots, land and land development costs
Other assets
Total assets
Liabilities and partners equity:
Liabilities:
Notes payable
Other liabilities
Total liabilities
Partners’ equity:
Company’s equity
Other equity
Total partners’ equity
Total liabilities and partners’ equity

Summarized Condensed Combined Statements of Operations:

(In thousands)
Revenue
Costs and expenses
Loss

December 31,

2005

2004

$135,661
1,489
$137,150

$ 36,786
2,519
39,305

49,910
47,935
97,845
$137,150

$48,229
1,129
$49,358

$ -
2,347
2,347

23,071
23,940
47,011
$49,358

2005
$ -

54
$(54)

Year Ended December 31,
2004
$ 2
139
$(137)

2003
$ 191
360
$(169)

The Company’s total equity in the loss relating to the above homebuilding LLCs was approximately $0.1 million in
each of the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003.

Title Operations Limited Liability Companies. As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, M/I Financial owned a 49.9%
interest in one unconsolidated title insurance agency that engages in title and closing services for the Company. The
Company’s maximum exposure related to this investment is limited to the amount invested, which was
approximately $19,000 and $23,000 at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. Approximately $36,000, $0.1
million and $2.0 million of title insurance premiums and closing fees were paid to our unconsolidated title agencies
in 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively. The total assets and corresponding total liabilities and partner’s equity for our
unconsolidated title agencies was approximately $5,000 and $6,000 as of December 31, 2005 and 2004,
respectively.

Summarized condensed combined statements of operations for our unconsolidated title agencies for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2005 is as follows:

(In thousands)
Revenue
Costs and expenses
Income

Year Ended December 31,

2005
$87
19
$68

2004
$243
42
$201

2003
$4,057
1,161
$2,896

The Company’s total equity in the income relating to the above title companies was $23,000 in 2005 and $1.7
million in 2003. The Company’s total equity in the loss relating to the above unconsolidated title companies was
$45,000 in 2004.

NOTE 5. Guarantees and Indemnities

Warranty. The Company provides a two-year limited warranty on materials and workmanship and a thirty-year
transferable limited warranty against major structural defects. Warranty amounts are accrued as homes close to
homebuyers and are intended to cover estimated material and outside labor costs to be incurred during the warranty
period. The reserve amounts are based upon historical experience and geographic location. The summary of warranty
activity is as follows:

(In thousands)
Warranty accruals, beginning of year
Warranty expense on homes delivered during the period
Changes in estimates for pre-existing warranties
Settlements made during the period
Warranty accruals, end of year

Year Ended December 31,

2005
$ 13,767
10,429
405
(10,661)
$ 13,940

2004
$ 9,173
9,986
4,480
(9,872)
$13,767

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

Guarantees and Indemnities. In the ordinary course of business, M/I Financial enters into agreements that
guarantee certain purchasers of its mortgage loans that M/I Financial will repurchase a loan if certain conditions
occur, primarily if the mortgagor does not meet those conditions of the loan within the first six months after the sale
of the loan. Loans totaling approximately $67.2 million and $383.0 million were covered under the above guaranty
as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. A portion of the revenue paid to M/I Financial for providing the
guaranty on the above loans was deferred at December 31, 2005, and will be recognized in income as M/I Financial
is released from its obligation under the guaranty. M/I Financial has not repurchased any loans under the above
agreements in 2005 or 2004, but has provided indemnifications to third party investors in lieu of repurchasing
certain loans. The total of these loans indemnified was approximately $2.6 million and $4.7 million as of December
31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, relating to the above agreements. The risk associated with the guarantees and
indemnities above is offset by the value of the underlying assets. The Company has accrued management’s best
estimate of the probable loss on the above loans.

M/I Financial has also guaranteed the collectibility of certain loans to third-party insurers of those loans for periods
ranging from five to thirty years. The maximum potential amount of future payments is equal to the outstanding
loan value less the value of the underlying asset plus administrative costs incurred related to foreclosure on the
loans, should this event occur. The total of these costs are estimated to be $2.8 million and $4.3 million at
December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and would be offset by the value of the underlying assets. The
Company has accrued management’s best estimate of the probable loss on the above loans.

The Company has also provided certain other guarantees and indemnifications. The Company has provided an
environmental indemnification to an unrelated third party seller of land in connection with the purchase of that land by
the Company. In addition, during 2005, the Company provided environmental indemnifications, guaranties for the
completion of land development and minimum net worth guarantees of certain the Company’s subsidiaries in
connection with outside financing provided by lenders to two of our 50% owned LLCs. Under the environmental
indemnifications, the Company and its partner in the LLC are jointly and severally liable for any environmental claims
relating to the property that are brought against the lender. Under the land development completion guaranties, the
Company and its partner in the LLC are jointly and severally liable to incur any and all costs necessary to complete the
development of the land in the event that the LLC fails to complete the project. The maximum amount that the
Company could be required to pay under the completion guaranties was approximately $26.7 million as of December
31, 2005. The risk associated with these guaranties is offset by the value of the underlying assets. Additionally, the
LLC operating agreements provide recourse against our partner in the LLC for 50% of any actual liability associated
with either the environmental indemnification or the completion guaranty.

The Company has recorded a liability relating to the guarantees and indemnities described above totaling $2.8 million
at December 31, 2005 and 2004, which is management’s best estimate of the fair value of the Company’s liability.

During 2005, the Company provided a guarantee of the performance and payment obligations of its wholly-owned
subsidiary, M/I Financial, up to an aggregate principle amount of $13.0 million. The guarantee was provided to a
government-sponsored enterprise M/I Financial delivers loans to.

NOTE 6. Commitments and Contingencies

At December 31, 2005, the Company had sales agreements outstanding, some of which have contingencies for
financing approval, to deliver 2,807 homes with an aggregate sales price of approximately $954.0 million. Based on
our current housing gross margin of 23.7% plus variable selling costs of 4.0% of revenue, we estimate payments
totaling approximately $766.5 million to be made in 2006 relating to those homes. At December 31, 2005, the
Company also has options and contingent purchase agreements to acquire land and developed lots with an aggregate
purchase price of approximately $452.6 million. Purchase of properties is contingent upon satisfaction of certain
requirements by the Company and the sellers.

At December 31, 2005, the Company had outstanding approximately $158.3 million of completion bonds and
standby letters of credit that expire at various times through December 2010. Included in this total are $114.2
million of performance bonds and $25.1 million of performance letters of credit that serve as completion bonds for
land development work in progress (including the Company’s $3.7 million share of our LLCs’ letters of credit);
$16.1 million of financial letters of credit, of which $13.8 million represent deposits on land and lot purchase
agreements; and $2.9 million of financial bonds.

At December 31, 2005, the Company has outstanding $3.3 million of corporate promissory notes. These notes are
due and payable in full upon default of the Company under agreements to purchase land or lots from third parties.

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

No interest or principal is due until the time of default. In the event that the Company performs under these
purchase agreements without default, the notes will become null and void and no payment will be required.

At December 31, 2005, the Company has $0.4 million of certificates of deposit included in Other Assets that have
been pledged as collateral for mortgage loans sold to third parties, and, therefore, are restricted from general use.

The Company and certain of its subsidiaries have been named as defendants in various claims, complaints and other
legal actions. Certain of the liabilities resulting from these actions are covered by insurance. While management
currently believes that the ultimate resolution of these matters, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a
material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or overall trends in results of operations, such matters
are subject to inherent uncertainties. The Company has recorded a liability to provide for the anticipated costs,
including legal defense costs, associated with the resolution of these matters. However, there exists the possibility
that the costs to resolve these matters could differ from the recorded estimates and, therefore, have a material
adverse impact on the Company’s net income for the periods in which the matters are resolved.

NOTE 7. Lease Commitments

The Company leases various office facilities, automobiles, model furnishings, and model homes under operating
leases with remaining terms of one to seven years. At December 31, 2005, the future minimum rental commitments
totaled $13.7 million under non-cancelable operating leases with initial terms in excess of one year as follows: 2006
- $7.3 million; 2007 - $3.5 million; 2008 - $1.4 million; 2009 - $0.6 million; 2010 - $0.4 million; and $0.5 million
thereafter. The Company’s total rental expense was $10.9 million, $9.1 million and $8.8 million for 2005, 2004 and
2003, respectively.

NOTE 8. Community Development District Infrastructure and Related Obligations

A Community Development District and/or Community Development Authority (“CDD”) is a unit of local
government created under various state and/or local statutes. The statutes allow CDDs to be created to encourage
planned community development and to allow for the construction and maintenance of long-term infrastructure
through alternative financing sources, including the tax-exempt markets. A CDD is generally created through the
approval of the local city or county in which the CDD is located and is controlled by a Board of Supervisors
representing the landowners within the CDD. CDDs may utilize bond financing to fund construction or acquisition
of certain on-site and off-site infrastructure improvements near or within these communities. CDDs are also granted
the power to levy special assessments to impose ad valorem taxes, rates, fees and other charges for the use of the
CDD project. An allocated share of the principal and interest on the bonds issued by the CDD is assigned to and
constitutes a lien on each parcel within the community (“Assessment”). The owner of each such parcel is
responsible for the payment of the Assessment on that parcel. If the owner of the parcel fails to pay the Assessment,
the CDD may foreclose on the lien pursuant to powers conferred to the CDD under applicable state laws and/or
foreclosure procedures. In connection with the development of certain of the Company’s communities, CDDs have
been established and bonds have been issued to finance a portion of the related infrastructure. Following are details
relating to the CDD bond obligations issued and outstanding:

Issue Date
5/1/2004
7/15/2004
7/15/2004

Maturity Date
5/1/2035
12/1/2022
12/1/2036

Interest Rate
6.00%
6.00%
6.25%

Total CDD bond obligations issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2005

Principal Amount
(in thousands)

$ 9,665
4,755
10,060
$24,480

In accordance with EITF Issue 91-10, “Accounting for Special Assessments and Tax Increment Financing,” the
Company records a liability, net of cash held by the district available to offset the particular bond obligation, for the
estimated developer obligations that are fixed and determinable and user fees that are required to be paid or
transferred at the time the parcel or unit is sold to an end user. The Company reduces this liability by the
corresponding Assessment assumed by property purchasers and the amounts paid by the Company at the time of
closing and the transfer of the property. The Company has recorded a $7.6 million liability related to these CDD
bond obligations as of December 31, 2005, along with the related inventory infrastructure.

In addition, in connection with the purchase of land during 2005, the Company assumed $2.5 million in CDD bond
obligation. This obligation bears interest at a rate of 5.5% and matures November 1, 2010. As lots are closed to
third parties, the Company will repay the CDD obligation associated with each lot. As of December 31, 2005, the
outstanding principal balance of the CDD obligation was $2.2 million.

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

NOTE 9. Consolidated Inventory Not Owned and Related Obligation

In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into land option agreements in order to secure land for the
construction of houses in the future. Pursuant to these land option agreements, the Company will provide a deposit
to the seller as consideration for the right to purchase land at different times in the future, usually at predetermined
prices. If the entity holding the land under option is a variable interest entity, the Company’s deposit (including
letters of credit) represents a variable interest in the entity. The Company does not guarantee the obligations or
performance of the variable interest entity.

The Company has evaluated all land option agreements and determined that the Company was subject to a majority
of the expected losses or entitled to receive a majority of the expected residual returns under an agreement. As the
primary beneficiary under this agreement, the Company is required to consolidate the fair value of the variable
interest entity.

As of December 31, 2005, the Company has recorded $4.1 million in Inventories on the consolidated balance sheet,
representing the fair value of land under the agreement. The corresponding liability has been classified as
Obligation for Consolidated Inventory Not Owned on the consolidated balance sheet.

NOTE 10. Notes Payable Banks

On April 22, 2005, the Company amended and restated its revolving credit facility (“Amended and Restated Credit
Facility”) to increase the maximum borrowing amount to $600 million from $500 million and to reduce the
accordion feature to $150 million from $250 million. In December 2005, the Company requested, and lenders
approved, an increase to $725 million maximum borrowing amount through use of $125 million of the accordion
feature. Following the December 2005 increase to $725 million there were twenty-one banks party to the
agreement. The Amended and Restated Credit Facility matures in September 2008. Borrowings under the
Amended and Restated Credit Facility are unsecured and are at the Alternate Base Rate plus a margin ranging from
zero to 37.5 basis points, or at the Eurodollar Rate plus a margin ranging from 100 to 200 basis points. The
Alternate Base Rate is defined as the higher of the Prime Rate, the Base CD Rate plus 100 basis points or the
Federal Funds Rate plus 50 basis points. Under the Amended and Restated Credit Facility, borrowing availability is
determined based on the lesser of: (1) Credit Facility loan capacity less Credit Facility borrowings (including cash
borrowings and letters of credit) or (2) lesser of Credit Facility capacity and calculated borrowing base, less
borrowing base indebtedness (including cash borrowings under the Credit Facility, senior notes, financial letters of
credit and the 10% commitment on the M/I Financial credit agreement). As of December 31, 2005, the Credit
Facility capacity was $725.0 million, compared to the calculated borrowing base of $617.3 million; the borrowing
base indebtedness was $482.7 million and the resulting borrowing availability was $134.6 million. The Credit
Facility contains covenants that require the Company, among other things, to maintain minimum net worth amounts
and to maintain certain financial ratios. The Credit Facility also places limitations on the amount of additional
indebtedness that may be incurred by the Company, limitations on the investments that the Company may make,
including joint ventures and advances to officers and employees, and limitations on the aggregate cost of certain
types of inventory that the Company can hold at any one time. The Company is required under the Credit Facility to
maintain a certain amount of tangible net worth, and as of December 31, 2005, had approximately $155.0 million
available for payment of dividends. As of December 31, 2005, the Company was in compliance with all restrictive
covenants of the Credit Facility. As of December 31, 2005, the outstanding borrowings had a weighted average
interest rate of 5.80%.

At December 31, 2005, the Company also had $46.0 million outstanding under the M/I Financial loan agreement,
which permitted borrowings of $65.0 million to finance mortgage loans initially funded by M/I Financial for our
customers. The $65.0 million borrowing capacity represented a temporary increase in M/I Financial’s loan
agreement for the period December 15, 2005 through January 15, 2006 due to anticipated higher borrowing needs at
December 31, 2005. In April 2005, the Company amended the M/I Financial revolving credit agreement and
increased the maximum borrowing amount to $40.0 million from $30.0 million. M/I Homes, Inc. and M/I Financial
are co-borrowers under the M/I Financial loan agreement. This agreement limits the borrowings to 95% of the
aggregate face amount of certain qualified mortgages and, as of December 31, 2005, the borrowing base was $64.6
million. Borrowings under the M/I Financial credit agreement are at the Prime Rate or at the Eurodollar Rate plus a
margin of 150 basis points. The agreement expires in April 2006; however, the Company currently anticipates
amending the term of the loan agreement. As of December 31, 2005, the weighted average interest rate for the M/I
Financial outstanding borrowings was 5.87%. As of December 31, 2005, the Company was in compliance with all
restrictive covenants of the M/I Financial loan agreement.

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

The annual weighted average interest rate for the Company’s bank borrowings was 5.6%, 4.8% and 9.1% for the
years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, respectively, which includes the interest rate swaps in effect
through the third quarter of 2004. Average bank borrowings were $272.7 million in 2005 and $185.6 million in
2004.

NOTE 11. Mortgage Notes Payable

As of December 31, 2005 and 2004, the Company had outstanding a building mortgage note payable in the principal
amount of $7.2 million and $7.4 million, respectively, with a fixed interest rate of 8.117% and maturity date of April
1, 2017. The book value of the collateral was $10.9 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004.

As of December 31, 2004, the Company had outstanding a $1.0 million land note payable, with a fixed interest rate
of 4.0% and maturity date of December 15, 2015. The book value of the collateral was $53.7 million at December
31, 2004. During 2005, the land note payable was forgiven by the holder of the note and resulted in a reduction in
the recorded value of the associated land.

NOTE 12. Senior Notes and Senior Subordinated Notes

During 2005, the Company sold $200 million of 6.875% senior notes due April 2012 (“Senior Notes”) in a private
placement pursuant to Rule 144A and Regulation S promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“the
Securities Act”). On July 14, 2005, a corresponding amount of Senior Notes was registered under the Securities
Act, and on August 31, 2005, the Company completed an exchange of the unregistered Senior Notes for registered
Senior Notes. The Company used the proceeds from the original Senior Notes issuance to repay amounts
outstanding under its revolving credit facility. The Senior Notes are guaranteed by substantially all of the
Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries.

The Senior Notes contain covenants that place limitations on the incurrence of additional indebtedness, payment of
dividends, asset dispositions, certain investments and creations of liens, among other items. The Company may
redeem the Senior Notes, in whole or in part, at any time before April 2012 at a redemption price equal to 100% of
the principal amount of the notes plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of the redemption, if any, plus a
“make-whole” premium based on U.S. Treasury Rates. As of December 31, 2005, the Company was in compliance
with all restrictive covenants of the Senior Notes.

On September 24, 2004, the Company prepaid its $50 million senior subordinated notes that were scheduled to
mature in August 2006. The redemption of the senior subordinated notes and termination of related contracts
resulted in a $3.0 million net of tax charge ($0.21 per diluted share) in the third quarter of 2004.

NOTE 13. Universal Shelf Registration

In April 2002, the Company filed a $150 million universal shelf registration statement with the SEC. Pursuant to the
filing, the Company may, from time to time over an extended period, offer new debt and/or equity securities. Of the
equity shares, up to 1 million common shares may be sold by certain shareholders who are considered selling
shareholders. This shelf registration should allow the Company to expediently access capital markets in the future.
The timing and amount of offerings, if any, will depend on market and general business conditions. No debt or equity
securities have been offered for sale as of December 31, 2005.

NOTE 14. Stock Incentive Plan

The Company’s Stock Incentive Plan includes stock options, restricted stock and stock appreciation programs, under
which the maximum number of shares of common stock that may be granted under the plan in each calendar year
shall be 5% of the total issued and outstanding shares of common stock as of the first day of each such year the plan
is in effect. No awards have been granted under the restricted stock and stock appreciation programs. Stock options
are granted at the market price at the close of business on the date of grant. Options awarded vest 20% annually
over five years and expire after ten years. The following summarizes the transactions under the stock option
program:

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

Options outstanding at December 31, 2002
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited
Options outstanding at December 31, 2003
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited
Options outstanding at December 31, 2004
Granted
Exercised
Forfeited
Options outstanding at December 31, 2005

Shares
532,960
231,000
(115,360)
(3,600)
645,000
238,000
(139,080)
(104,000)
639,920
283,000
(128,470)
(13,550)
780,900

Option Price
Per Share

$5.31 – $30.76
27.15
5.31 – 28.55
9.28 – 28.55
$6.69 – 30.76
43.24 – 46.61
6.69 – 28.55
6.69 – 28.55
$6.69 – 46.61
54.85
6.69 – 46.61
16.38 – 54.85
$6.69 – 54.85

Weighted
Avg. Exercise
Price
$18.92
27.15
16.15
19.78
$22.36
46.57
18.93
24.17
$31.81
54.85
25.41
38.41
$41.09

For various price ranges, weighted average characteristics of outstanding and currently exercisable stock options as
of December 31, 2005 are as follows:

Range of Exercise Prices
$ 6.69 – 16.38
27.15 – 30.76
43.24 – 54.85

Outstanding Options

Exercisable Options

Shares
78,300
215,000
487,600

Weighted Avg.
Remaining Life
(years)
4.83
6.71
8.70

Weighted
Avg. Exercise
Price
$13.90
27.75
51.34

Weighted
Avg. Exercise
Price
$13.90
27.85
49.92

Shares
78,300
146,680
138,840

As required under SFAS 123, the fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant. The Company
uses the Black-Scholes pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:

Expected dividend yield
Risk-free interest rate
Expected volatility
Expected life (in years)
Weighted average grant date fair value of options

Year Ended December 31,
2003
2004
2005

0.23%
3.77%
29.2%

6
$19.38

0.26%
2.79%
32.5%

6
$16.62

0.32%
2.90%
37.4%

6
$10.75

In February 2006, the Company granted options for an additional 367,500 shares with the same terms as the
previous awards, at a price of $41.45, which represents the market value at the date of grant.

NOTE 15. Preferred Stock

The Articles of Incorporation authorize the issuance of 2,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $.01 per share.
The Board of Directors of the Company is authorized, without further shareholder action, to divide any or all shares
of the authorized preferred stock into series and to fix and determine the designations, preferences and relative,
participating, optional or other special rights and qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereon, of any series so
established, including dividend rights, liquidation preferences, redemption rights and conversion privileges.

NOTE 16. Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes consists of the following:

(In thousands)
Federal
State and local
Total

(In thousands)
Current
Deferred
Total

2005
$52,124
8,518
$60,642

2005
$60,085
557
$60,642

December 31,
2004
$48,771
10,992
$59,763

December 31,
2004
$57,273
2,490
$59,763

2003
$44,825
8,544
$53,369

2003
$46,507
6,862
$53,369

For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, the Company’s effective tax rate was 37.6%, 39.5% and
39.5%, with the decrease from 2004 to 2005 resulting from the manufacturing credit established by the 2004
American Jobs Creation Act, a change in the state of Ohio’s tax laws, which phases out the Ohio income tax and

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

replaces it with a gross receipts tax, and the settlement of certain state tax-related items. Reconciliation of the
differences between income taxes computed at the federal statutory tax rate and consolidated provision for income
taxes are as follows:

(In thousands)
Federal taxes at statutory rate
State and local taxes – net of federal tax benefit
Other
Total

2005
$56,500
5,537
(1,395)
$60,642

December 31,

2004
$52,954
7,145
(336)
$59,763

2003
$47,285
5,554
530
$53,369

The tax effects of the significant temporary differences that comprise the deferred tax assets and liabilities are as
follows:

(In thousands)
Deferred tax assets:
Warranty, insurance and other accruals
Inventories
State taxes
Deferred charges
Total deferred tax assets
Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation
Prepaid expenses and deferred charges
Total deferred tax liabilities
Net deferred tax asset

NOTE 17. Financial Instruments

December 31,

2005

2004

$8,405
3,660
1,424
3,573
17,062

7,166
1,423
8,589
$8,473

$8,832
2,500
1,724
3,598
16,654

6,690
934
7,624
$9,030

Mortgage loans held for sale. Mortgage loans held for sale consist primarily of single-family residential loans
collateralized by the underlying property. All mortgage loans are committed to third-party investors at the date of
funding and are typically sold to such investors within two weeks of funding. The commitments associated with
funded loans are designated as fair value hedges of the risk of changes in the overall fair value of the related loans,
as further discussed below. Accordingly, changes in the value of derivative instruments are recognized in current
earnings, as are changes in the value of the loans. The net gain or loss is included in financial services revenue.

Loan commitments. To meet financing needs of our home-buying customers, M/I Financial is party to interest rate
lock commitments (“IRLCs”), which are extended to certain customers who have applied for a mortgage loan and
meet certain defined credit and underwriting criteria. Typically, the IRLCs will have a duration of less than six
months; however, in certain markets, the duration could extend to twelve months.

Certain IRLCs are committed to a specific third-party investor and are matched with best effort whole loan delivery
commitments matching the exact terms of the IRLC loan. The notional amount of the committed IRLCs and the
best efforts contracts was $52.8 million and $109.9 million at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. At
December 31, 2005, the fair value of the committed IRLCs resulted in a liability of $0.6 million and the related best
efforts contracts resulted in an asset of $0.6 million. At December 31, 2004, the fair value of the committed IRLCs
resulted in a liability of $0.7 million and the fair value of the related best efforts contracts resulted in an offsetting
asset of $0.7 million. For the year ended December 31, 2005, the Company recorded less than $0.1 million expense
relating to marking these committed IRLCs to market, whereas in 2004 and 2003 there was no net gain or loss.

The cost, if any, of the best-efforts whole loan delivery commitments is recorded as an asset and expensed as loans
are funded under the related commitments. Any remaining unused balance is expensed when the commitment
expires, or earlier if the Company determines that they will be unable to fulfill the commitment prior to its
expiration date.

Uncommitted IRLCs are considered derivative instruments under SFAS 133 and are fair value adjusted, with the
resulting gain or loss recorded in current earnings. At December 31, 2005 and 2004, the notional amount of the
uncommitted IRLC loans was $32.1 million and $32.5 million, respectively. The fair value adjustment related to
these commitments, which is based on quoted market prices, resulted in a $0.3 million liability and $0.1 million
asset at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, we
recognized $0.4 million expense, $2.6 million income and $3.0 million expense, respectively, relating to marking
these commitments to market.

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

are classified and accounted for as non-designated derivative instruments, with gains and losses recorded in current
earnings. At December 31, 2005, the notional amount under the FMBSs was $33.0 million, and the related fair
value adjustment, which is based on quoted market prices, resulted in a liability of $0.2 million. At December 31,
2004, the notional amount under the FMBSs was $35.0 million, and the related fair value adjustment resulted in less
than a $0.1 million liability. For the years ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003, we recognized $0.2 million
expense, $0.3 million income and $1.0 million income, respectively, relating to marking these FMBSs to market.

Counterparty Credit Risk. To reduce the risk associated with accounting losses that would be recognized if
counterparties failed to perform as contracted, the Company limits the entities that management can enter into a
commitment with to the primary dealers in the market. This risk of accounting loss is the difference between the
market rate at the time of non-performance by the counterparty and the rate the Company committed to.

The following table presents the carrying amounts and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at
December 31, 2005 and 2004. SFAS No. 107, “Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments”, defines the
fair value of a financial instrument as the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current
transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale.

(Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
Cash, including cash in escrow
Mortgage loans held for sale
Other assets
Commitments to extend real estate loans
Best efforts contracts for committed IRLCs
Liabilities:
Notes payable banks
Mortgage notes payable
Senior notes
Commitments to extend real estate loans
Forward sale of mortgage-backed securities
Other liabilities
Off-Balance Sheet Financial Instruments:
Letters of credit

December 31, 2005

December 31, 2004

Carrying
Amount

Fair
Value

Carrying
Amount

Fair
Value

$ 56,908
67,416
44,168
-
618

306,000
7,165
198,400
897
209
136,820

$ 56,908
67,416
43,814
-
618

306,000
8,092
179,250
897
209
136,820

$ 24,082
67,918
30,855
94
692

309,000
8,370
-
692
23
112,394

$ 24,082
67,918
30,592
94
692

309,000
10,484
-
692
23
112,278

1,571

738

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating its fair value disclosures of
financial instruments at December 31, 2005 and 2004:

Cash, Cash Held in Escrow and Other Liabilities. The carrying amounts of these items approximate fair value,
except at December 31, 2004, the fair value of Other Liabilities was determined by calculating the present value of
the amounts based on the estimated timing of payments.

Mortgage Loans Held for Sale, Forward Sale of Mortgage-Backed Securities, Commitments to Extend Real
Estate Loans, Best Efforts Contracts for Committed IRLCs and Senior Notes. The fair value of these financial
instruments was determined based upon market quotes at December 31, 2005 and 2004.

Other Assets. The estimated fair value was determined by calculating the present value of the amounts based on the
estimated timing of receipts.

Notes Payable Banks. The interest rate currently available to the Company fluctuates with the Alternate Base Rate
or Eurodollar Rate (for the homebuilding credit facility) and the Prime Rate or Eurodollar Rate (for the financial
services credit agreement), and thus their carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Mortgage Notes Payable. The estimated fair value was determined by calculating the present value of the future
cash flows.

Letters of Credit. Letters of credit and outstanding completion bonds of $158.3 million and $112.8 million
represent potential commitments at December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The letters of credit generally expire
within one or two years. The estimated fair value of letters of credit was determined using fees currently charged for
similar agreements.

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

NOTE 18. Business Segments

In conformity with SFAS 131, the Company’s segment information is presented on the basis that the chief operating
decision makers use in evaluating segment performance. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as
those described in the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies included in Note 1 of our consolidated financial
statements. In the table below, eliminations consist of fees paid by the homebuilding operations relating to loan
origination and title fees for its homebuyers that are included in financial services’ revenue; the homebuilding
segment’s housing costs include these fees paid to financial services.

NOTE 19. Subsequent Events

2005

Year Ended December 31,
2004

2003

$1,326,751
28,635
(7,740)
$1,347,646

$1,150,136
32,909
(8,410)
$1,174,635

$ 4,410

$ 4,498

$ 2,336
112
$ 2,448

$ 13,737

$ 8,052

371

290

$ 14,108

$ 8,342

$ 143,378

18,049
$ 161,427

$ 129,665
21,632

$ 151,297

$ 53,862

$ 51,218

6,780

8,545

$ 60,642

$ 59,763

$1,252,567
77,111

$1,329,678

$ 901,605

76,921
$ 978,526

$ 3,626

$ 1,570

219

114

$ 3,845

$ 1,684

$1,045,680
27,666
(4,853)
$1,068,493

$ 2,254
128
$ 2,382

$ 4,595
236
$ 4,831

$ 115,006
20,093
$ 135,099

$ 45,432
7,937
$ 53,369

$ 675,807
71,065
$ 746,872

$ 15,707
36
$ 15,743

On February 3, 2006, the Company increased its Credit Facility to $735 million, and as a result has $15 million
remaining under an accordion feature.

On February 13, 2006, the Board of Directors approved a $0.025 per share cash dividend payable to shareholders of
record of its common stock on April 3, 2006, payable on April 20, 2006.

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

There have been no changes in or disagreements with accountants during each of the two years ended December 31,
2005 and 2004.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures
was performed under the supervision, and with the participation, of the Company's management, including the chief
executive officer and the chief financial officer. Based on that evaluation, the Company's management, including
the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and
procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The management of M/I Homes, Inc. and subsidiaries (“M/I Homes” or “the Company”) is responsible for
establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. M/I Homes’ internal control system
was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and Board of Directors regarding the
preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems
determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and
presentation.

M/I Homes’ management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2005. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework. Based on
management’s assessment, we believe that, as of December 31, 2005, the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting is effective based on those criteria.

Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2005 has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in
their report included herein.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of
fiscal year 2005 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting. It should be noted that the design of any system of controls is based, in part, upon certain
assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in
achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote. In addition, a control
system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the
objectives of the control system are met.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

There is no information that was required to be disclosed in a report on Form 8-K during the fourth quarter of 2005
that has not been reported on a Form 8-K.

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Shareholders and Directors of M/I Homes, Inc.
Columbus, Ohio

We have audited management’s assessment, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting, that M/I Homes, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) maintained effective
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on criteria established in Internal Control—
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The
Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its
assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on management’s assessment and an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit
included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s
assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such
other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected
by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding
the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in
accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance
regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that
could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion
or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or
detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over
financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, management’s assessment that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on the criteria established in
Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2005, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United
States), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related
consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2005, and our report dated February 28, 2006 expressed an unqualified opinion on those
financial statements.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Deloitte & Touche LLP

Columbus, Ohio
February 28, 2006

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement relating
to the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that applies to our directors and all employees of the
Company. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is posted on our website, mihomes.com. We intend to satisfy
the requirements under Item 5.05 of Form 8-K regarding disclosure of amendments to, or waivers from, provisions
of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that apply to our directors, executive officers and principal accounting
officer by posting such information on our website. Copies of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics will be
provided free of charge upon written request directed to Investor Relations, M/I Homes, Inc., 3 Easton Oval, Suite
500, Columbus, OH 43219.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement relating
to the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement relating
to the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement relating
to the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to our definitive Proxy Statement relating
to the 2006 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) Documents filed as part of this report
1. The following financial statements are contained in Item 8:

Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2005 and 2004
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004
and 2003
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2005, 2004 and 2003
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Page in
this
Report

32
33
34

35
36
37-52

2. Financial Statement Schedules:

None required.

3. Exhibits:

The following exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K are filed as part of this report. For convenience of
reference, the exhibits are listed according to the numbers appearing in the Exhibit Table to Item 601 Regulation S-
K.

Exhibit
Number

3.1

3.2

3.3

Description

Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company, hereby incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1993.

Amended and Restated Regulations of the Company, hereby incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.4 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K of the fiscal year ended December
31, 1998.

Amendment of Article I(f) of the Company’s Amended and Restated Code of Regulations to
permit shareholders to appoint proxies in any manner permitted by Ohio law, hereby
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1(b) of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2001.

4.1

Specimen of Stock Certificate, hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 of the

Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, Commission File No. 33-68564.

4.2

10.1*

10.2*

Indenture dated as of March 24, 2005 by and among M/I Homes, Inc., its guarantors as named
in the Indenture and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee of the 6 7/8% Senior Notes
due 2012, hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s Current Report
on Form 8-K dated as of March 24, 2005.

The M/I Homes, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan as Amended and Restated, adopted as of
January 1, 1997, hereby incorporate by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.

Amendment Number 1 of the M/I Homes, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan for the Economic
Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 dated November 12, 2002, hereby
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2002.

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

10.3*

10.4*

10.5*

10.6

10.7

10.8

10.9

10.10

10.11

10.12

10.13

10.14

Second Amendment to the M/I Homes, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan dated November 11,
2003, hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.

Third Amendment to the M/I Homes, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan dated January 26, 2005,
hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.

Fourth Amendment to the M/I Homes, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan dated July 1, 2005,
hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005.

Amended and Restated Credit Agreement by and among M/I Homes, Inc., as borrower;
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (formerly Bank One, NA,) as agent for the lenders and U.S.
Bank National Association, as syndication agent; Bank of America, N.A., The Huntington
National Bank, KeyBank National Association and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as
documentation agents; Guaranty Bank, PNC Bank, National Association, National City Bank
and Suntrust Bank, as co-agents; JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., U.S. Bank National
Association, Bank of America, N.A., Wachovia Bank, National Association, The Huntington
National Bank, KeyBank National Association, National City Bank, SunTrust Bank, Guaranty
Bank, PNC Bank, National Association, AmSouth Bank, Charter One Bank, N.A., City
National Bank, a national banking association, Comerica Bank, Fifth Third Bank, an Ohio
banking corporation, Union Bank of California, N.A., Bank United, FSB, and Washington
Mutual Bank, FA, as banks; and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., as lead arranger and sole
bookrunner, dated April 22, 2005, hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 of the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated April 27, 2005.

Commitment and Acceptance dated as of December 2, 2005, by and among M/I Homes, Inc.
as borrower, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as agent, and the lenders party to that certain
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated April 22, 2005, hereby incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 6,
2005.

Commitment and Acceptance dated as of February 3, 2006, by and among M/I Homes, Inc. as
borrower, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as agent, and the lenders party to that certain
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated April 22, 2005. (Filed herewith.)

Revolving Credit Agreement by and among M/I Financial Corp., the Company and Guaranty
Bank dated May 3, 2001, hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001.

First Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement by and among M/I Financial Corp., the
Company and Guaranty Bank dated May 2, 2002, hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002.

Second Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement by and among M/I Financial Corp., the
Company and Guaranty Bank dated May 1, 2003, hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003.

Third Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement by and among M/I Financial Corp., the
Company and Guaranty Bank dated April 29, 2004, hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004.

Fourth Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement by and among M/I Financial Corp., the
Company and Guaranty Bank dated August 5, 2004, hereby incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004.

Fifth Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement by and among M/I Financial Corp., the
Company and Guaranty Bank dated April 28, 2005, hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005.

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

10.15

Sixth Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement by and among M/I Financial Corp., the

Company and Guaranty Bank dated December 1, 2005. (Filed herewith.)

10.16*

10.17*

10.18*

10.19*

10.20

10.21

10.22

10.23

10.24*

10.25*

10.26*

10.27*

10.28*

M/I Homes, Inc. 1993 Stock Incentive Plan As Amended dated April 22, 1999, hereby
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 1999.

First Amendment to M/I Homes, Inc. 1993 Stock Incentive Plan As Amended dated August
11, 1999, hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999.

Second Amendment to the Company’s 1993 Stock Incentive Plan as Amended dated February
13, 2001, hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002.

M/I Homes, Inc. 2004 Executive Officers Compensation Plan, hereby incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
31, 2004.

M/I Homes, Inc. Director Deferred Compensation Plan, hereby incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
1997.

First Amendment to M/I Homes, Inc. Director Deferred Compensation Plan dated February
16, 1999, hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1999.

Second Amendment to M/I Homes, Inc. Director Deferred Compensation Plan dated July 1,
2001, hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 of the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.

Third Amendment to M/I Homes, Inc. Director Deferred Compensation Plan dated January 1,
2005, hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 of the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004.

Amended and Restated M/I Homes, Inc. Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan dated April
18, 2001, hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001.

First Amendment to M/I Homes, Inc. Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan dated July 1,
2001, hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 of the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002.

Second Amendment to M/I Homes, Inc. Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan dated June
19, 2002, hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002.

Third Amendment to M/I Homes, Inc. Executives’ Deferred Compensation Plan dated as of
March 8, 2004, hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 of the Company’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

Collateral Assignment Split-Dollar Agreement by and among the Company and Robert H.
Schottenstein, and Janice K. Schottenstein, as Trustee, of the Robert H. Schottenstein 1996
Insurance Trust dated September 24, 1997, hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28
of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997. In
2004, the Trustee changed to Steven Schottenstein but did not require amendment to the
original agreement.

10.29*

Collateral Assignment Split-Dollar Agreement by and among the Company and Steven
Schottenstein, and Irving E. Schottenstein, as Trustee, of the Steven Schottenstein 1994

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

Insurance Trust dated September 24, 1997, hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29
of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997. In
2004, the Trustee changed to Robert H. Schottenstein but did not require amendment to the
original agreement.

Change of Control Agreement between the Company and Phillip G. Creek dated as of March
8, 2004, hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 of the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003.

The Company’s 2006 Award Formulas and Performance Goals for the Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer, hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current
Report on Form 8-K dated February 17, 2006.

The Company’s 2006 Award Formulas and Performance Goals for the Vice Chairman and
Chief Operating Officer, hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s
Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 17, 2006.

The Company’s 2006 Award Formulas and Performance Goals for the Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer, hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 17, 2006.

The Company’s 2006 Award Formulas and Performance Goals for the Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary, hereby incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 17, 2006.

10.30*

10.31*

10.32*

10.33*

10.34*

10.35*

M/I Homes, Inc. President’s Circle Bonus Pool Plan, hereby incorporated by reference to

Exhibit 10.5 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 17, 2006.

31.1

31.2

32.1

Earnings Per Share Calculations. (Filed herewith.)

Subsidiaries of Company. (Filed herewith.)

Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP. (Filed herewith.)

Powers of Attorney. (Filed herewith.)

Certification by Robert H. Schottenstein, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Item 601 of
Regulation S-K as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Filed
herewith.)

Certification by Phillip G. Creek, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-
K as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Filed herewith.)

Certification by Robert H. Schottenstein, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Filed herewith.)

32.2

Certification by Phillip G. Creek, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as

Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (Filed herewith.)

* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

(b) Exhibits

Reference is made to Item 15(a)(3) above. The following is a list of exhibits, included in Item 15(a)(3) above,

that are filed concurrently with this report.

Exhibit
Number

10.8

Description

Commitment and Acceptance dated as of February 3, 2006, by and among M/I Homes, Inc.
as borrower, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as agent, and the lenders party to that certain
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated April 22, 2005.

10.15

Sixth Amendment to Revolving Credit Agreement by and among M/I Financial Corp., the

Company and Guaranty Bank dated December 1, 2005.

Earnings Per Share Calculations.

Subsidiaries of Company.

Consent of Deloitte & Touche LLP.

Powers of Attorney.

31.1

Certification by Robert H. Schottenstein, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Item 601 of

Regulation S-K as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2

Certification by Phillip G. Creek, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation

S-K as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1

Certification by Robert H. Schottenstein, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.

Section 1350 as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2

Certification by Phillip G. Creek, Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

None required.

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in Columbus, Ohio on
this 28th day of February 2006.

M/I Homes, Inc.
(Registrant)

By: /s/ ROBERT H. SCHOTTENSTEIN

Robert H. Schottenstein
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the
following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on the 28th day of February 2006.

NAME AND TITLE

/s/ ROBERT H. SCHOTTENSTEIN
Robert H. Schottenstein
Chairman of the Board,
Chief Executive Officer and President

(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ PHILLIP G. CREEK
Phillip G. Creek
Senior Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer and Director
(Principal Financial Officer)

/s/ ANN MARIE W. HUNKER
Ann Marie W. Hunker
Corporate Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)

STEVEN SCHOTTENSTEIN*
Steven Schottenstein
Chief Operating Officer and Director

JEFFREY H. MIRO*
Jeffrey H. Miro
Director

NORMAN L. TRAEGER*
Norman L. Traeger
Director

FRIEDRICH K. M. BÖHM*
Friedrich K. M. Böhm
Director

LEWIS R. SMOOT, SR.*
Lewis R. Smoot, Sr.
Director

THOMAS D. IGOE*
Thomas D. Igoe
Director

JOSEPH A. ALUTTO*
Joseph A. Alutto
Director

*The above-named Directors and Officers of the Registrant execute this report by Robert H. Schottenstein and
Phillip G. Creek, their Attorneys-in-Fact, pursuant to powers of attorney executed by the above-named Directors and
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as Exhibit 24 to this report.

By: /s/ ROBERT H. SCHOTTENSTEIN

Robert H. Schottenstein, Attorney-In-Fact

By:

/s/ PHILLIP G. CREEK
Phillip G. Creek, Attorney-In-Fact

/
I

H
O
M
E
S
2
0
0
5
A
N
N
U
A
L
R
E
P
O
R
T

OTHER KEY OFFICERS

PAUL S. ROSEN

Senior Vice President

LLOYD T. SIMPSON

Regional President

CORPORATE INFORMATION
CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS

3 Easton Oval
Columbus, Ohio 43219
mihomes.com

STOCK EXCHANGE LISTING

New York Stock Exchange (MHO)

TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR

Computershare Trust Company N.A.
250 Royall Street
Canton, MA 02021
(781) 575-3120
www.Computershare.com

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Columbus, Ohio

ANNUAL MEETING

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders will be held
at 9:00 A.M. on April 27, 2006, at the offices of
the Company, 3 Easton Oval, Columbus, Ohio

NYSE CERTIFICATION

On May 9, 2005, Robert H. Schottenstein, Chief
Executive Office of the Company certificated to
the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) the most
recent Annual CEO certification as required by
Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock
Exchange Listed Company Manual.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
ROBERT H. SCHOTTENSTEIN

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
and President

STEVEN SCHOTTENSTEIN

Chief Operating Officer

PHILLIP G. CREEK

Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

J. THOMAS MASON

Senior Vice President,
General Counsel and Secretary

DIRECTORS
FRIEDRICH K.M. BÖHM

Managing Partner and
Chief Executive Officer,
NBBJ

PHILLIP G. CREEK

Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

THOMAS D. IGOE

Retired Senior Vice President,
Bank One NA

JEFFREY H. MIRO
Partner
Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP

ROBERT H. SCHOTTENSTEIN

Chairman, Chief Executive Officer
and President

STEVEN SCHOTTENSTEIN

Chief Operating Officer

LEWIS R. SMOOT, SR.

President and Chief Executive Officer,
The Smoot Corporation

NORMAN L. TRAEGER

President,
The Discovery Group

JOSEPH A. ALUTTO PH.D.

Dean of Fisher College of Business
at The Ohio State University

T
R
O
P
E
R
L
A
U
N
N
A
5
0
0
2
S
E
M
O
H

I
/

3 Easton Oval • Suite 500 • Columbus, OH 43219 • 614-418-8000