Quarterlytics / Technology / Hardware, Equipment & Parts / MicroVision, Inc.

MicroVision, Inc.

mvis · NASDAQ Technology
Claim this profile
Ticker mvis
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Technology
Industry Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Employees 185
← All annual reports
FY2001 Annual Report · MicroVision, Inc.
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
R E A L I Z E   P O T E N T I A L

2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1  

2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1  

M I C R O V I S I O N   2 0 0 1   A N N U A L   R E P O R T

2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1  

Microvision is a world leader in the development of optical scanning systems
for a broad range of display and imaging applications. Our proprietary 
miniature display and imaging products are based on advanced techniques for
creating high-performance microminiature optical scanners on silicon chips.

F E L L O W   S H A R E H O L D E R S

“... transformation of 

an R&D organization

into a commercial

enterprise... ”

We have just completed the most successful year in Microvision’s history, recording
record revenue for the year and for the fourth quarter of 2001. As a result of our
revenue growth for the last three years, we were awarded a place in Deloitte and
Touche’s Fast 50 for the state of Washington and the Fast 500 for the United States.
2001 was a year of challenges and commitments, a year of inspiring teamwork
and organizational growth.
It was a year in which we successfully implemented the
operating disciplines that must accompany the transformation of an R&D organization
into a commercial enterprise, while staying true to the passions and creative ener-
gies that are the essence of innovation and the heart of our entrepreneurial culture.
Microvision completed the development of two unique and compelling products;

the recently launched Nomad™ Personal Display System and the soon-to-be-launched
Flic™ Personal Bar Code Scanner. The sense of accomplishment that comes with
reaching a long prized goal was compounded by a very real sense of historical
moment. The Nomad System is not only a tremendous technological achievement,
and Microvision’s first product; it is also the first display ever based on a scanning
micromirror, and the world’s only commercial system using a scanned-beam display.

In addition to being technologically distinctive, the Nomad System’s performance

is unrivaled by any other wearable display. Surgeons, soldiers, emergency workers,
technicians, and pilots continue to respond enthusiastically to the product, and as I
write this, we are actively developing a team of qualified channel partners to address
a variety of exciting market opportunities for the Nomad System, and ramping pro-
duction to support growing demand. Looking to the future, we believe that these
are only the first small steps in the development of a whole new category of unique
and powerful mobile information tools that can, over time, become as pervasive as
electronic information systems themselves.

The first test marketing introduction of our Flic Personal Bar Code Scanner 
in November elicited a strong response from channel partners, prospective OEM 
partners and large potential end-users. Early indications suggest that our mid-year
launch of the Flic scanner may be followed with robust sales during the second 
half of 2002.

Microvision worked hard during the last year to realize the potential of our 

proprietary scanning technology in our first commercial products, but we also 
continued to further develop its potential for a broad array of future products.

We made great strides in combining our unique microscanning mirror with low
cost light emitting diodes (LEDs) to address the potential for high volume consumer
applications of our miniature displays. We demonstrated prototypes that produce

“... passions and creative energies that

are the essence of innovation and the

heart of our entrepreneurial culture... ”

“... with each passing day, we 

see potential being realized

and discover new potentials

for Microvision’s powerful

platform technologies.”

extraordinary image quality, and through partnerships with Walsin Lihwa, Cree and others, we believe
that we can produce superior quality displays for much lower costs than competing miniature displays.
We continue to progress with the development of laser-scanning cameras for a variety of image
capture applications, ranging from two-dimensional bar code readers to machine vision systems and
advanced medical scopes.

During the last year our team delivered prototype systems of unique laser-scanning projection 
systems to leading automobile manufacturers. Our ongoing contract work for the U.S. military has
resulted in a helmet mounted display system of unmatched performance. New contracts initiated late
in 2001 have broadened the scope of our funded projects to include developments aimed at wearable
displays for military surgeons, medics and dismounted troops that build on and leverage our ongoing
development of the Nomad System.

Early in the year, we completed a $24 million funding for our Lumera subsidiary with Cisco as lead
investor, and we continue to look forward to developments from Lumera in the future as they develop
powerful products based on their world leadership in electro-optic polymer technology.

2001 was a time of prolific innovation. We added a substantial number of new patents and applica-

tions to our growing portfolio of intellectual property. We now have over 57 issued U.S. patents and
nearly 100 pending. We will continue to innovate and to protect our inventions at both Microvision
and Lumera.

Indeed 2001 has been the most successful year in Microvision’s history, and it is satisfying to reflect
on our many achievements during this time, but we believe the coming year holds even more promise.
We have introduced our first commercial product and will soon introduce a second. We continue to
achieve technological breakthroughs that we believe will enable our product pipeline to broaden steadi-
ly for many years to come.

We are working with a growing list of outstanding partners to deliver powerful products and solu-
tions, so that we can translate a position of technological leadership in microscanning systems technol-
ogy for displays and imaging into market leadership.

One cannot help but feel the gathering momentum and the thrill of a promising future as, with each
passing day, we see potential being realized and discover new potentials for Microvision’s powerful plat-
form technologies.

We thank you for your support during these exciting times.

Richard F. Rutkowski

P R E S I D E N T  A N D  

C H I E F   E X E C U T I V E   O F F I C E R

2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1  

2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1  

2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1  

2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1  

2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1  

2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1  

2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1  

2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
e
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1  

2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1  

2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1
2 0 0 1  

ealizR

re•al•ize (re´ -liz´) v. [Fr. réaliser < OFr. realizer 
< real, real < LLat. realis < Lat. res, thing] – to bring
about, to make real, to achieve.

“MICROVISION  HAS THE  CLEAR  POTENTIAL TO  REVOLUTIONIZE THE WAY  IN WHICH VISUAL  INFORMATION  IS  PRESENTED 

IN WORK AND  LEISURE  ENVIRONMENTS.” 

DR.

JOHN  MARSHALL, FROST  PROFESSOR  OF  OPHTHALMOLOGY, ST THOMAS’ HOSPITAL, LONDON

D
A
M
O
N

The Nomad™ Personal Display System, Microvision’s first commercial product, is a ‘see-through’,
high-resolution, daylight-readable, head-worn display that augments the user’s natural vision by
super-imposing electronic information into the field of view to bring information to the “point
of task”. The Nomad System enables mobile workers to work hands-free and head-up in any
lighting condition, allowing access to information anywhere. As a result, the Nomad System
delivers major improvements in situational awareness, productivity, safety and precision, and
provides greater versatility for mobile applications than alternative display solutions.

The Nomad System produces a high-
contrast, high-resolution (SVGA) image
that super-imposes electronic informa-
tion onto the user’s point of task.

INFORMATION

FOCUS  ON

N O M A D ’ S   F I R S T   C U S TO M E R S :

ANYWHERE

APPLIC ATIONS,

CHANNELS  &

REFERENCE

ACCOUNTS

STRYKER  LEIBINGER (a division of Stryker
Corporation): Nomad will help improve 
accuracy and decrease orthopedic operative
time for surgeons.

EUROCONTRO L Nomad will improve visuali-
zation for air traffic controllers, potentially 
reducing stress and workload, reducing
delays, and improving airport safety.

ARVIKA (a consortium of companies includ-
ing Siemens,Volkswagen, Daimler Chrysler,
Zeiss, BMW, and Airbus): Using Nomad 
to improve development, production and
servicing of complex technical products.

TELESENSORY Nomad could well improve 
the ability of people with poor vision to
read printed material.

Pilots, surgeons, soldiers,
technicians, and emer-
gency workers continue
to respond enthusiastically
to the Nomad System.
Production is beginning 
to ramp up to support
growing demand.

O
V
E
R

6
0

M

I
L
L
I

O
N

O
N

-
P
R
E
M

I
S
E

M
O
B

I
L
E

W
O
R
K
E
R
S

AEROSPACE

MEDIC A L

INDUSTRIAL

MARKET  OPPORTUNITIES

 
 
 
 
 
LASER  PERFORMANCE AT THE  PRICE  OF A WAND

C
I
L
F

Flic easily scans, decodes and stores
common bar code symbols. The
product is expected to become
commercially available in mid-2002.

BY  2004, THE  LINEAR  B AR  CODE  HANDHELD
MARKET WILL  REACH  $1.8  BILLION.

As an outgrowth of its efforts in Retinal Scanning Display technology, Microvision developed capabilities
and technologies that resulted in patent-pending breakthroughs in image capture and scanning. The first
product (to be delivered in mid-2002) is a revolutionary new bar code scanner. The FLIC™ Personal 
Bar Code Scanner has performance characteristics that exceed competing scanner solutions — at a 
cost below current market solutions.

“WE  HAVE  HAD A VERY  POSITIVE  RESPONSE  BOTH  FROM  POTENTIAL  CHANNEL  PARTNERS

AND  POTENTIAL  OEM  PARTNERS. SIMILARLY, FORWARD-THINKING  END  USERS  HAVE

RESPONDED TO  FLIC  BY  ENVISIONING WHOLLY  NEW  USE  MODELS THAT  DISTRIBUTE

B AR  CODE  SC ANNING  MUCH  MORE  BROA DLY ACROSS THEIR WORKFORCES. WITH A

MID-YEAR  COMMERCIAL  LAUNCH TARGET, EARLY  INDIC ATIONS  SUGGEST THAT WE  MAY

SEE  ROBUST  SALES ACTIVITY  FROM  FLIC  DURING THE  SECOND  HALF  OF  2002.”

CHRIS WIKLOF, MICROVISION, DIRECTOR  OF  PRODUCT  MANAGEMENT

S
N
O

I

T
A
C

I
L
P
P
A

C

I
L
F

MANUFACTURING

order processing
work-in-process tracking
materials tracking
time and attendance

TRANSPORTATION

shipping and receiving
cross-docking
shipment tracking

HEALTH  C ARE

bedside transaction 
processing
security access
time and attendance
medical record maintenance

COMMERCIAL  SERVICES

shipping and receiving
asset management
inventory control

WAREHOUSING

inventory management
order processing

RETAIL  IN  STORE

point of sale (POS)
customer relationship 
management (CRM)
inventory management

GOVERNMENT

asset tracking
logistics support
personnel tracking

CONSUMER
registry
shopping lists
price/product comparison
catalog shopping
information retrieval

E
C

I

R
P

WANDS

LASER
SC ANNERS

FLIC

PERFORMANCE

UNLIKE TRADITIONAL  SC ANNERS, MICROVISION  USES A  FRESH APPROACH
TO  CREATE A  LOW-COST, HIGH-PERFORMANCE  IMAGE  C APTURE  DEVICE.

PRODUCTIVITY

 
“ W E ’ R E   E X T R E M E LY   E X C I T E D  A B O U T   O U R   N E X T   P H A S E   O F  A P P L I C AT I O N  A N D   I N T E G R AT I O N   D E V E L O P M E N T  W O R K

W I T H   M I C RO V I S I O N ’ S   D I S P L AY. T H E   I M A G E   Q U A L I T Y   O F  T H E   D I S P L AY   I S   O U T S TA N D I N G  A N D  W E  A R E   C O N F I D E N T  T H AT
T H E   D I S P L AY,
I N T E G R AT E D  W I T H   O U R   S O F T WA R E , W I L L   B E  A N   I M P O RTA N T   D E M O N S T R AT I O N  TO O L   F O R  A  VA R I E T Y   O F
P OT E N T I A L   C U S TO M E R S  W H O   R E Q U I R E   E N H A N C E D  V I S U A L I Z AT I O N  A N D   N AV I G AT I O N   C A PA B I L I T I E S .”  

DR. RICHARD  EDWARDS, MANAGER  OF  CREW  SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, BOEING  PHANTOM WORKS

Our on-going contract work for the U.S. military
resulted in a helmet-mounted display of unmatched
performance. This prototype display system is being
tested and evaluated for flight simulators and even-
tually operational aircraft.

MISSION CRITICAL

Current applications in military cockpits and high-end medical equipment
allow for continued rapid innovation of retinal scanning displays that produce
single or full-color imagery, resulting in broad market opportunities.

E
S
N
E
F
E
D

S
T
C
A
R
T
N
O
C

T
N
E
M
P
O
L
E
V
E
D

V I RT U A L   C O C K P I T  
O P T I M I Z AT I O N   P RO G R A M

S P E C T R U M

B I D T   &  TAT R C

A I R C R E W   I N T E G R AT E D   H E L M E T

F U L L   C O L O R

B R I G H T

S E E - T H RO U G H

DAY L I G H T-
R E A DA B L E

M O N O C U L A R

B I N O C U L A R

H I - R E S O L U T I O N

S I N G L E   C O L O R

S F I X E D  W I N G
R
E
S
U

G RO U N D   P E R S O N N E L

L
A

I

T
N
E
T
O
P

M E D I C A L   S U P P O RT

G RO U N D  V E H I C L E S

ROTA RY  W I N G

T E C H N O L O G Y   M AT U R AT I O N

C O N C E P T   D E M O S

F I E L D  T E S T

E - M D

P RO D U C T I O N

F Y 0 0

0 1

0 2

0 3

0 4

0 5

0 6

0 7

MICROVISION  CONTINUES TO  LEVERAGE  DEFENSE  CONTRACTS AND  PARTNERSHIPS

TO  COVER  KEY TECHNOLOGY AND  PRODUCT  DEVELOPMENT  REQUIREMENTS  FOR

FUTURE  DEFENSE  PRODUCTS.

New contracts have broadened the scope of our funded projects to include developments
that build on and leverage our ongoing work in the category of wearable displays for military
surgeons, medics and dismounted troops, in addition to our work with the Army on helmet
mounted displays for rotorcraft.

“ P E A C E - K E E P I N G   H A S   B E C O M E   I N F O R M AT I O N - D R I V E N  A N D   O U R  A R M E D   F O R C E S   M U S T   B E  A B L E  

TO   R E C E I V E ,
I N T E G R AT E , A N D   R A P I D LY  A S S I M I L AT E   I N F O R M AT I O N   F RO M   D I S PA R AT E   S O U R C E S . B Y  
P U T T I N G   I N F O R M AT I O N   I N   H E A D - U P, S E E - T H RO U G H   M O D E , M I C RO V I S I O N ’ S   R E T I N A L   S C A N N I N G  
D I S P L AY  T E C H N O L O G Y   C A N   B E  A   K E Y   E N A B L E R   I N  T H I S   P RO C E S S .”

BILL  SYDNES, MICROVISION, COO

VISU ALIZATION

 
 
“ I ’ M  V E RY   I M P R E S S E D  W I T H  T H E   I M A G E
Q U A L I T Y. T H E  T E C H N O L O G Y   O F F E R S
T H E   E M I S S I V E  A N D   U N P I X E L AT E D   Q U A L -
I T I E S  T H AT   H AV E  A L L O W E D   C RT S  TO
D O M I N AT E   D E S K TO P  A N D  T E L E V I S I O N
M A R K E T S , W H I L E   O F F E R I N G  T H E   P OT E N -
T I A L   O F  V E RY   L O W   C O S T S   I N  A   S U B -
I   C A N ’ T  WA I T  
M I N I AT U R E   PA C K A G E .
TO   G E T  A   3 G   C E L L   P H O N E  W I T H  A
M I C RO V I S I O N   D I S P L AY   I N S I D E .”  

DR ARIS  SILZARS, PRESIDENT,

SOCIETY  FOR  INFORMATION  DISPLAYS 

MOBILITY

Microvision’s consumer strategy is to create display
products that can have a dominant position in mar-
kets where high performance must be combined with
very low cost. Our work on microdisplays is intend-
ed to generate a “virtual” image that appears close in
size and resolution to that of a desktop display. This
can be a powerful feature for high-volume applica-
tions like digital cameras, gaming systems, handheld
wireless devices and portable DVD players.

From just three light emitting
diodes (LEDs) coupled with a
vibrating mirror on a tiny micro-
mechanical chip, Microvision’s
microdisplay platform can be
packaged into a broad range of
high-volume consumer products.

M I C RO V I S I O N ’ S
M I C RO D I S P L AY
P L AT F O R M

Y
A
L
P
S
I
D
O
R
C
M

I

Addressable market:
600-800 million units 
per year by 2005.

H A N D H E L D   P C S

W I R E L E S S   H A N D S E T S

D V D   P L AY E R S

G A M E   C O N S O L E S

D I G I TA L   C A M E R A S

S
T

I

N
U

F
O

S
N
O

I
L
L
I

M

1200

1000

800

600

400

200

0

02

03

04

05

YEAR

T H E   G L O B A L   M A R K E T   F O R  A U TO M OT I V E  T E L E M AT I C S   I S   E X P E C T E D
TO   G RO W  TO   $ 4 7 . 2   B I L L I O N   B Y   2 0 1 0   F RO M   $ 4 . 2   B I L L I O N   I N   2 0 0 0 .

F U T U R E   P OT E N T I A L   M I C RO D I S P L AY  A P P L I C AT I O N S   F O R  A U TO M O B I L E S :

F RO N T   P RO J E C T I O N
S E E - T H RO U G H , H I G H -
B R I G H T N E S S   D I S P L AY S
( O N   PA N E L S  A N D
W I N D   S C R E E N )

R E A R   P RO J E C T I O N
H I G H - B R I G H T N E S S
D I S P L AY   O N   R E A R -
V I E W   M I R RO R

H E A D   M O U N T E D
E N T E RTA I N M E N T
D I S P L AY

F RO N T   P RO J E C T I O N
H I G H - B R I G H T N E S S
E N T E RTA I N M E N T
D I S P L AY

V I RT U A L , H I G H -
B R I G H T N E S S  A N D
L O O K - A RO U N D
D I S P L AY  A B O V E / I N
DA S H   B O A R D

R E A R - P RO J E C T I O N ,
H I G H - B R I G H T N E S S
R E - C O N F I G U R A B L E
DA S H   B O A R D

R E A R - P RO J E C T I O N ,
H I G H - B R I G H T N E S S
R A D I O / C D / G P S
D I S P L AY

H I G H - B R I G H T N E S S ,
R E A R   P RO J E C T I O N
D I S P L AY   O N  
M I R RO R S

Microvision is working with
numerous automotive com-
panies to integrate microdis-
plays into a variety of future
automotive applications.

“ TO DAY ’ S  W I R E L E S S   I N T E R N E T   D E V I C E S  A R E   L I M I T E D   B Y  T H E I R   S M A L L   D I S P L AY   S C R E E N S . A   K E Y   R E M A I N I N G   I N G R E D I E N T

F O R   M A K I N G  W I R E L E S S   DATA   C O M M U N I C AT I O N  A N D   M O B I L E   I N T E R N E T  A   R E A L I T Y   I S  A  V I A B L E   D I S P L AY  T E C H N O L O G Y   F O R
P O RTA B L E   D E V I C E S . M I C RO V I S I O N ’ S   R E T I N A L   S C A N N I N G   D I S P L AY   O F F E R S  A   U N I Q U E  A N D   I N N O VAT I V E   S O L U T I O N  TO   M E E T
T H E   C H A L L E N G I N G   M I X   O F   C O S T, P E R F O R M A N C E  A N D   M I N I AT U R I Z AT I O N   R E Q U I R E D   F O R  T H I S   K I N D   O F  A P P L I C AT I O N .”  

ANDREW VITERBI, CO-FOUNDER, QUALCOMM, PRESIDENT, THE VITERBI  GROUP

 
 
M I C RO V I S I O N ’ S   O P T I C A L   N E T W O R K   C O M -
P O N E N T S   S U B S I D I A RY   C O M P L E T E D  A   $ 2 4
M I L L I O N   RO U N D   O F   F I N A N C I N G   L E D   B Y
C I S C O   S Y S T E M S ,

I N   M A R C H   2 0 0 1 .

I N C .

As an outgrowth of its ongoing work in photonics, Microvision’s majority owned subsidiary,
Lumera, builds on patented technology using groundbreaking polymer tehnologies to create
electro-optic devices. Devices built out of these polymers act as light gates, or optical switch-
es, and are highly valued by optical equipment manufacturers.

A
R
E
M
U
L

P

I

H
C

-

A

-

N
O

-
S
M
E
T
S
Y
S

L
A
C

I

T
P
O

D
E
T
A
R
G
E
T
N

I

BANDWIDTH

Prototype devices based on materials developed 
by Lumera’s research team have already achieved
record-setting bandwidth (in excess of 100 GHz)
and operating voltages (below 1 volt) in demonstra-
tions at commercial and government research labs.

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

C
R
O
V

C
R
O
V

C
R
O
V

C
R
O
V

C
R
O
V

C
R
O
V

C
R
O
V

C
R
O
V

C
R
O
V

C
R
O
V

C
R
O
V

C
R
O
V

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

O
N

O
N

O
N

O
N

O
N

O
N

O
N

O
N

O
N

O
N

O
N

O
N

’

’

’

’

’

’

’

’

’

’

’

’

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

U
N

U
N

U
N

U
N

U
N

U
N

U
N

U
N

U
N

U
N

U
N

U
N

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

Q
U
E

Q
U
E

Q
U
E

Q
U
E

Q
U
E

Q
U
E

Q
U
E

Q
U
E

Q
U
E

Q
U
E

Q
U
E

Q
U
E

B
E
A
M

S
C
A
N
N

B
E
A
M

S
C
A
N
N

B
E
A
M

S
C
A
N
N

B
E
A
M

S
C
A
N
N

B
E
A
M

S
C
A
N
N

B
E
A
M

S
C
A
N
N

B
E
A
M

S
C
A
N
N

B
E
A
M

S
C
A
N
N

B
E
A
M

S
C
A
N
N

B
E
A
M

S
C
A
N
N

B
E
A
M

S
C
A
N
N

B
E
A
M

S
C
A
N
N

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

N
G

N
G

N
G

N
G

N
G

N
G

N
G

N
G

N
G

N
G

N
G

N
G

T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y

T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y

T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y

T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y

T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y

T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y

T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y

T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y

T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y

T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y

T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y

T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y

C
A
N

C
A
N

C
A
N

C
A
N

C
A
N

C
A
N

C
A
N

C
A
N

C
A
N

C
A
N

C
A
N

C
A
N

B
E

B
E

B
E

B
E

B
E

B
E

B
E

B
E

B
E

B
E

B
E

B
E

A
P
P
L
I
E
D

A
P
P
L
I
E
D

A
P
P
L
I
E
D

A
P
P
L
I
E
D

A
P
P
L
I
E
D

A
P
P
L
I
E
D

A
P
P
L
I
E
D

A
P
P
L
I
E
D

A
P
P
L
I
E
D

A
P
P
L
I
E
D

A
P
P
L
I
E
D

A
P
P
L
I
E
D

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

M
A
N
Y

M
A
N
Y

M
A
N
Y

M
A
N
Y

M
A
N
Y

M
A
N
Y

M
A
N
Y

M
A
N
Y

M
A
N
Y

M
A
N
Y

M
A
N
Y

M
A
N
Y

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

D

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

S
P
L
A
Y

S
P
L
A
Y

S
P
L
A
Y

S
P
L
A
Y

S
P
L
A
Y

S
P
L
A
Y

S
P
L
A
Y

S
P
L
A
Y

S
P
L
A
Y

S
P
L
A
Y

S
P
L
A
Y

S
P
L
A
Y

A
N
D

A
N
D

A
N
D

A
N
D

A
N
D

A
N
D

A
N
D

A
N
D

A
N
D

A
N
D

A
N
D

A
N
D

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

M
A
G
E

C
A
P
T
U
R
E

A
P
P
L
I

C
A
T

M
A
G
E

C
A
P
T
U
R
E

A
P
P
L
I

C
A
T

M
A
G
E

C
A
P
T
U
R
E

A
P
P
L
I

C
A
T

M
A
G
E

C
A
P
T
U
R
E

A
P
P
L
I

C
A
T

M
A
G
E

C
A
P
T
U
R
E

A
P
P
L
I

C
A
T

M
A
G
E

C
A
P
T
U
R
E

A
P
P
L
I

C
A
T

M
A
G
E

C
A
P
T
U
R
E

A
P
P
L
I

C
A
T

M
A
G
E

C
A
P
T
U
R
E

A
P
P
L
I

C
A
T

M
A
G
E

C
A
P
T
U
R
E

A
P
P
L
I

C
A
T

M
A
G
E

C
A
P
T
U
R
E

A
P
P
L
I

C
A
T

M
A
G
E

C
A
P
T
U
R
E

A
P
P
L
I

C
A
T

M
A
G
E

C
A
P
T
U
R
E

A
P
P
L
I

C
A
T

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

D I S P L AY

O
N
S

O
N
S

O
N
S

O
N
S

O
N
S

O
N
S

O
N
S

O
N
S

O
N
S

O
N
S

O
N
S

O
N
S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

A

O
F

O
F

O
F

O
F

O
F

O
F

O
F

O
F

O
F

O
F

O
F

O
F

F
R
O
M

F
R
O
M

F
R
O
M

F
R
O
M

F
R
O
M

F
R
O
M

F
R
O
M

F
R
O
M

F
R
O
M

F
R
O
M

F
R
O
M

F
R
O
M

A
C
R
O
S

A
C
R
O
S

A
C
R
O
S

A
C
R
O
S

A
C
R
O
S

A
C
R
O
S

A
C
R
O
S

A
C
R
O
S

A
C
R
O
S

A
C
R
O
S

A
C
R
O
S

A
C
R
O
S

R
A
N
G
E

R
A
N
G
E

R
A
N
G
E

R
A
N
G
E

R
A
N
G
E

R
A
N
G
E

R
A
N
G
E

R
A
N
G
E

R
A
N
G
E

R
A
N
G
E

R
A
N
G
E

R
A
N
G
E

M
A
R
K
E
T
S

M
A
R
K
E
T
S

M
A
R
K
E
T
S

M
A
R
K
E
T
S

M
A
R
K
E
T
S

M
A
R
K
E
T
S

M
A
R
K
E
T
S

M
A
R
K
E
T
S

M
A
R
K
E
T
S

M
A
R
K
E
T
S

M
A
R
K
E
T
S

M
A
R
K
E
T
S

C A P T U R E

T R A N S M I T

otentiaP po•ten•tial (p -ten´sh l) adj. [ME potencial < OFr. < LLat.

potentatus < Lat., power < potens, pr.part. of posse, to be able] 
– the inherent ability or capacity for growth.

C
O
N
S
U
M
E
R

C
O
N
S
U
M
E
R

C
O
N
S
U
M
E
R

C
O
N
S
U
M
E
R

C
O
N
S
U
M
E
R

C
O
N
S
U
M
E
R

C
O
N
S
U
M
E
R

C
O
N
S
U
M
E
R

C
O
N
S
U
M
E
R

C
O
N
S
U
M
E
R

C
O
N
S
U
M
E
R

C
O
N
S
U
M
E
R

D
E
F
E
N
S
E

D
E
F
E
N
S
E

D
E
F
E
N
S
E

D
E
F
E
N
S
E

D
E
F
E
N
S
E

D
E
F
E
N
S
E

D
E
F
E
N
S
E

D
E
F
E
N
S
E

D
E
F
E
N
S
E

D
E
F
E
N
S
E

D
E
F
E
N
S
E

D
E
F
E
N
S
E

S
C
A
N
N

S
C
A
N
N

S
C
A
N
N

S
C
A
N
N

S
C
A
N
N

S
C
A
N
N

S
C
A
N
N

S
C
A
N
N

S
C
A
N
N

S
C
A
N
N

S
C
A
N
N

S
C
A
N
N

C
R
O
V

C
R
O
V

C
R
O
V

C
R
O
V

C
R
O
V

C
R
O
V

C
R
O
V

C
R
O
V

C
R
O
V

C
R
O
V

C
R
O
V

C
R
O
V

B
E
A
M

B
E
A
M

B
E
A
M

B
E
A
M

B
E
A
M

B
E
A
M

B
E
A
M

B
E
A
M

B
E
A
M

B
E
A
M

B
E
A
M

B
E
A
M

Q
U
E

Q
U
E

Q
U
E

Q
U
E

Q
U
E

Q
U
E

Q
U
E

Q
U
E

Q
U
E

Q
U
E

Q
U
E

Q
U
E

e

e

O
N

O
N

O
N

O
N

O
N

O
N

O
N

O
N

O
N

O
N

O
N

O
N

U
N

U
N

U
N

U
N

U
N

U
N

U
N

U
N

U
N

U
N

U
N

U
N

T
O

T
O

T
O

T
O

T
O

T
O

T
O

T
O

T
O

T
O

T
O

T
O

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

M

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

S

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

’

.

.

’

.

’

.

’

.

’

.

.

’

.

’

.

’

’

.

’

’

.

’

.

“ L U M E R A ’ S   M AT E R I A L   S C I E N T I S T S , D E V I C E   D E S I G N E R S  A N D   C H A R A C T E R I Z AT I O N   S P E C I A L I S T S  A R E  T E A M I N G  

W I T H  T H E   U N I V E R S I T Y   O F  WA S H I N G TO N ’ S   P O LY M E R   E X P E RT S  TO   D E L I V E R  T H E   P OT E N T I A L   O F  T H I S  T E C H N O L O G Y
TO  T H E   E L E C T RO - O P T I C   M A R K E T   I N   2 0 0 2 .”    

TOM  MINO, LUMERA, CEO

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

N
G

N
G

N
G

N
G

N
G

N
G

N
G

N
G

N
G

N
G

N
G

N
G

T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y

T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y

T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y

T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y

T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y

T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y

T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y

T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y

T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y

T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y

T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y

T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y

C
A
N

C
A
N

C
A
N

C
A
N

C
A
N

C
A
N

C
A
N

C
A
N

C
A
N

C
A
N

C
A
N

C
A
N

B
E

B
E

B
E

B
E

B
E

B
E

B
E

B
E

B
E

B
E

B
E

B
E

A
P
P
L
I
E
D

A
P
P
L
I
E
D

A
P
P
L
I
E
D

A
P
P
L
I
E
D

A
P
P
L
I
E
D

A
P
P
L
I
E
D

A
P
P
L
I
E
D

A
P
P
L
I
E
D

A
P
P
L
I
E
D

A
P
P
L
I
E
D

A
P
P
L
I
E
D

A
P
P
L
I
E
D

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

I

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

N

M
A
N

M
A
N

M
A
N

M
A
N

M
A
N

M
A
N

M
A
N

M
A
N

M
A
N

M
A
N

M
A
N

M
A
N

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
THREE  POWERFUL  GROWTH  ENGINES

With over 57 patents granted and 100 patents pending in the U.S.
and abroad, Microvision built a substantial portfolio of technologies
surrounding retinal scanning and projection displays, new forms of
image capture and machine vision, and optical signal transmission
devices. These platform technologies provide compelling new
approaches to enable powerful new products for many markets.

F A S T

J E T

P U B L I C   S A F E T Y

F I E L D

M E D I C

P H A S E D   A R R AY

S Y S T E M S

S P A C E

E X P L O R AT I O N

D I S P L AY

C A P T U R E

T R A N S M I T

D E F E N S E

A E R O S P A C E

G E N E R A L  

A V I A T I O N

M E D I C A L

C A R D I O L O G Y

A U T O

M A I N T E N A N C E

L I N E A R

B A R   C O D E

P E R S O N A L

T R A N S P O R T   H U D

3 G

C E L L P H O N E S

I N D U S T R I A L

U.S. Patent No. 5,467,104

U.S. Patent No. 5,557,444

U.S. Patent No. 5,596,339
U.S. Patent No. 5,659,327
A U T O M O T I V E
U.S. Patent No. 5,694,237

U.S. Patent No. 5,701,132

U.S. Patent No. 5,751,465

U.S. Patent No. 5,903,397

U.S. Patent No. 5,913,591

U.S. Patent No. 5,969,871
U.S. Patent No. 5,982,528
C O N S U M E R
U.S. Patent No. 5,982,555
U.S. Patent No. 5,995,264

U.S. Patent No. 6,008,781

U.S. Patent No. 6,043,799

U.S. Patent No. 6,046,720

U.S. Patent No. 6,049,407

U.S. Patent No. 6,061,163

U.S. Patent No. 6,069,725

U.S. Patent No. 6,154,321

U.S. Patent No. 6,157,352

U.S. Patent No. 6,166,841

U.S. Patent No. 6,191,761

U.S. Patent No. 6,204,829

U.S. Patent No. 6,204,832

U.S. Patent No. 6,220,711

U.S. Patent No. 6,243,186

U.S. Patent No. 6,257,727

U.S. Patent No. 6,281,862

U.S. Patent No. 6,288,816

U.S. Patent No. 6,285,505

U.S. Patent No. 6,272,907
U.S. Patent No. 6,229,139

U.S. Patent No. 6,122,394

U.S. Patent No. 6,064,779

U.S. Patent No. 6,044,705

U.S. Patent No. 5,969,465

U.S. Patent No. 5,861,549

U.S. Patent No. 5,841,553

U.S. Patent No. 6,068,751

U.S. Patent No. 5,895,866

U.S. Patent No. 5,658,710

U.S. Patent No. 6,140,979

U.S. Patent No. 6,151,167

U.S. Patent No. 6,245,590

U.S. Patent No. 6,256,131

U.S. Patent No. 6,285,489

U.S. Patent No. 6,324,007

R O T O R C R A F T

A I R   T R A F F I C

C O N T R O L

O R T H O P E D I C S

D I S M O U N T E D

T R O O P S

S C A N N I N G

E N D O S C O P E

A N E S T H E S I O L O G Y

N E U R O S U R G E RY

A V I AT I O N

M R O

2 D

B A R   C O D E

M I C R O

P R O J E C T O R S

M I L I TA RY

M R O

L O W

V I S I O N

C O N F O C A L

M I C R O P R O B E

M A C H I N E

V I S I O N

S P O R T S

F I B E R   O P T I C

N E T W O R K S

O P T I C A L

I C ’ S

M O T O R C Y C L E

H E L M E T S

P E R S O N A L

V I E W E R

T R A V E L

E N T E R TA I N M E N T

V I E W   F I N D E R S

G A M I N G

| F I N A N C I A L   I N F O R M AT I O N |

2001 was the most successful year in Microvision’s history,
and we believe 2002 will be even better. As we realize our 
success, we build upon our potential.

F O R W A R D   L O O K I N G   S T A T E M E N T S
Included in this report are photographic depictions of products and potential applications and products. Actual products and designs may vary prior to commercialization.

The statements in this annual report that relate to future plans, events or performance and potential applications of our technology are forward-looking statements within the
meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and are subject to the safe harbor created by that section. Actual results might
differ materially due to a variety of important factors. These factors involve risks and uncertainties relating to, among other things, market acceptance of and the current devel-
opmental  stage  of  the  Company’s  technology; the  Company’s  history  of  negative  cash  flows  and  current  expectation  of  additional  losses; change  in  display  technologies; the
Company’s lack of manufacturing experience and ongoing capital requirements; and the Company’s dependence on key personnel.The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission contains additional information about these and other risk and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materi-
ally from those in the forward-looking statements.

MVIS

M V I S

| S E L E C T E D   F I N A N C I A L   D ATA |

18

M V I S

| R E P O R T   O F   I N D E P E N D E N T  A C C O U N TA N T S |

19

A summary of selected financial data as of and for the five years ended December 31, 2001 is set forth below:

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Microvision, Inc.

Y E A R   E N D E D   D E C E M B E R   3 1 ,

2001

2000

1999

1998

1997

( I N   T H O U S A N D S , E X C E P T   P E R   S H A R E   D A T A )

S TAT E M E N T   O F   O P E R AT I O N S   D ATA
Revenue
Net loss available for common shareholders
Basic and diluted net loss per share
Weighted average shares 

$ 10,762
(34,794)
(2.85)

$   8,121
(26,601)
(2.33)

$   6,903
(16,700)
(2.04)

$ 7,074
(7,328)
(1.22)

$ 1,713
(4,945)
(.85)

outstanding – basic and diluted

12,200

11,421

8,169

5,994

5,806

B A L A N C E   S H E E T   D ATA
Cash, cash equivalents and investments 

available-for-sale

Working capital
Total assets
Long-term obligations
Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock
Total shareholders’ equity

$ 33,652
33,098
54,055
552

$ 40,717
40,551
56,172
714

32,326

50,042

$ 32,167
32,802
41,619
836
1,536
35,359

$ 2,269
1,358
6,362
282

$ 8,841
8,441
10,741
92

2,589

9,164

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and the related consolidated statements of operations, of share-
holders’ equity, of comprehensive loss and of cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Microvision,
Inc. and its subsidiary at December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2001 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America.These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management; our responsibility is to express
an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with
auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on
a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used
and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Seattle,Washington 
March 27, 2002

| C O N S O L I D AT E D   B A L A N C E   S H E E T |

20

M V I S

| C O N S O L I D AT E D   S TAT E M E N T   O F   O P E R AT I O N S |

21

2001

2000

Y E A R   E N D E D   D E C E M B E R   3 1 ,

2001

2000

1999

D O L L A R S   I N   T H O U S A N D S   E X C E P T   P E R   S H A R E   I N F O R M A T I O N

Revenue
Cost of revenue
Gross margin
Research and development expense (exclusive of non-cash 

compensation expense of $865, $7 and $34 
for 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively)

Marketing, general and administrative expense (exclusive of 
non-cash compensation expense of $1,668, $1,585 and 
$230 for 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively)

Non-cash compensation expense
Total operating expenses
Loss from operations
Interest income
Interest expense
Realized gain on sale of investment securities

$ 10,762 
6,109 
4,653 

$   8,121 
6,076 
2,045 

$   6,903 
4,944 
1,959 

31,899 

19,520

10,199 

14,356 
2,533 
48,788 
(44,135)
2,523 
(92)
316

10,475 
1,592 
31,587 
(29,542)
3,105 
(164)
—

7,205 
264
17,668 
(15,709)
1,163 
(172)
—

Loss before minority interests

(41,388)

(26,601)

(14,718)

Minority interests in loss of consolidated subsidiary

6,594

—

—

Net loss

Less: Preferred dividend
Non-cash beneficial conversion feature of Series B Preferred Stock
Net loss available for common shareholders

Net loss per share – basic and diluted
Weighted-average shares outstanding – basic and diluted

(34,794)

(26,601)

(14,718)

— 
— 
$(34,794)

$   (2.85)
12,200 

—
—
$(26,601)

$   (2.33)
11,421 

(228)
(1,754)
$(16,700)

$   (2.04)
8,169 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

M V I S

A S   O F   D E C E M B E R   3 1 ,

D O L L A R S   I N   T H O U S A N D S

A S S E T S

C U R R E N T  A S S E T S
Cash and cash equivalents
Investment securities, available-for-sale
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $109 and $93
Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts
Inventory, net
Current restricted investments
Other current assets
Total current assets

Long-term investment, at cost
Property and equipment, net
Restricted investments
Receivables from related parties
Other assets
Total assets

L I A B I L I T I E S , M I N O R I T Y   I N T E R E S T S  A N D   S H A R E H O L D E R S ’   E Q U I T Y

C U R R E N T   L I A B I L I T I E S
Accounts payable
Accrued liabilities
Allowance for estimated contract losses
Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on uncompleted contracts
Current portion of capital lease obligations
Current portion of long-term debt
Total current liabilities

Capital lease obligations, net of current portion
Long-term debt, net of current portion
Deferred rent, net of current portion
Total liabilities

Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)
Minority interests 

S H A R E H O L D E R S ’   E Q U I T Y
Common stock, no par value, 31,250 shares authorized;
12,998 and 11,884 shares issued and outstanding

Deferred compensation
Subscriptions receivable from related parties
Accumulated other comprehensive income
Accumulated deficit
Total shareholders’ equity
Total liabilities, minority interests and shareholders’ equity

$  15,587 
18,065 
1,712 
1,584 
99
102 
2,302 
39,451 

624 
8,960 
1,434 
2,252 
1,334 
$  54,055 

$   1,613 
4,298 
155 
60 
170 
57 
6,353 

61 
232 
259 
6,905 

— 
14,824

135,954 
(2,803)
(321)
427 
(100,931)
32,326 
$  54,055 

$   7,307 
33,410 
1,033 
2,116 
—
1,125 
976 
45,967 

624 
7,516 
951 
1,000 
114 
$ 56,172 

$   1,974 
2,359 
295 
419 
317 
52 
5,416 

182 
290 
242 
6,130 

— 
— 

120,506 
(4,378)
(403)
454
(66,137)
50,042 
$ 56,172 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

M V I S

| C O N S O L I D AT E D   S TAT E M E N T   O F   S H A R E H O L D E R S ’   E Q U I T Y |

22

M V I S

| C O N S O L I D AT E D   S TAT E M E N T   O F   C O M P R E H E N S I V E   L O S S |

23

D O L L A R S   I N   T H O U S A N D S

Common Stock

Shares

Amount

Subscriptions 

Accum. Other 
Deferred Receivable from  Comprehensive
(Loss) Income

Related Parties

Compensation

Accumulated
Deficit

Shareholders’
Equity

Y E A R   E N D E D   D E C E M B E R   3 1 ,

2001

2000

1999

D O L L A R S   I N   T H O U S A N D S

Net loss
Other comprehensive income (loss) – unrealized 

gain (loss) on investment securities, available-for-sale:
Unrealized holding gains arising during period
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains realized in net loss
Net unrealized gain (loss)

Comprehensive loss

$(34,794)

$(26,601)

$(14,718)

289
(316)
(27)
$(34,821)

515
—
515
$(26,086)

(61)
—
(61)
$(14,779)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Balance at December 31, 1998

6,065

$  25,743

$  (239)

$  (79)

$  —

$  (22,836)

$   2,589

Issuance of stock to board members for services

Exercise of warrants and options

Sales of common stock

Beneficial conversion feature of mandatorily 

redeemable preferred stock, net of costs

Conversion of preferred stock

Deferred compensation on stock options

Forfeitures of unvested stock options

Amortization of deferred compensation

Dividend on preferred stock

Other comprehensive loss

Net loss 

5 

2,961

710 

400

149

33,556

9,738 

1,754 

4,334

197 

(108)

155

(149)

(270)

(197)

108 

264

— 

33,286

9,738

—

4,334

—

— 

264

(73)

(61)

(1,754)

(228)

(61) 

Balance at December 31, 1999

10,141

75,518

(213)

(349)

(61) 

Issuance of stock and options 

to board members for services

Exercise of warrants and options

Sales of common stock

Issuance of stock for acquisition of license

Conversion of mandatorily preferred stock

Deferred compensation on warrants and options

Revaluations of warrants

Collection of subscriptions receivable

Amortization of deferred compensation

Other comprehensive income

Net loss 

4 

1,108 

500 

31 

100 

623

13,342

23,977

376

1,536 

6,870

(1,736)

(623)

(285)

(6,870)

1,736

1,592

231

Balance at December 31, 2000

11,884

120,506

(4,378)

(403)

Issuance of stock and options to 

board members for services

Issuance of stock and options to board 

non-members for services

Exercise of warrants and options

Sales of common stock

Effect of change in interest in 

subsidiary common stock

Issuance of stock for acquisition of license

Revaluations of warrants

Collection of subscriptions receivable

Amortization of deferred compensation

Other comprehensive loss

Net loss

6

1

99

971

37

133

(133)

108

1,177

10,355

3,001

970

(296)

(52)

296

1,464

82

515

454

(27) 

(14,718)

(39,536)

(14,718)

35,359

—

13,057

23,977

376

1,536

— 

—

231

1,592

515

(26,601)

(66,137)

(26,601)

50,042

—

56

1,177

10,355

3,001

970

—

82

1,464

(27)

(34,794)

(34,794)

Balance at December 31, 2001

12,998

$135,954 

$(2,803)

$(321)

$427

$(100,931)

$ 32,326

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

M V I S

| C O N S O L I D AT E D   S TAT E M E N T   O F   C A S H   F L OW S |

24

M V I S

| C O N S O L I D AT E D   S TAT E M E N T   O F   C A S H   F L OW S   C O N T.

|

25

Y E A R   E N D E D   D E C E M B E R   3 1 ,

2001

2000

1999

Y E A R   E N D E D   D E C E M B E R   3 1 ,

2001

2000

1999

D O L L A R S   I N   T H O U S A N D S

D O L L A R S   I N   T H O U S A N D S  

C A S H   F L OW S   F R O M   O P E R AT I N G  A C T I V I T I E S
Net loss

$(34,794)

$(26,601)

$(14,718)

A D J U S T M E N T S  T O   R E C O N C I L E   N E T   L O S S  T O   N E T   C A S H   U S E D   I N   O P E R AT I O N S
Depreciation
Non-cash expenses related to issuance of stock, warrants and 

options, and amortization of deferred compensation

Non-cash expenses related to issuance of stock 

for an exclusive license agreement

Minority interests in loss of consolidated subsidiary
Non-cash deferred rent
Allowance for estimated contract losses

C H A N G E   I N
Accounts receivable
Costs and estimated earnings in excess 
of billings on uncompleted contracts

Inventory
Other current assets
Other assets
Accounts payable 
Accrued liabilities
Billings in excess of costs and estimated 
earnings on uncompleted contracts

Net cash used in operating activities

C A S H   F L OW S   F R O M   I N V E S T I N G  A C T I V I T I E S
Sales of investment securities
Purchases of investment securities
Sales of restricted investment securities
Purchases of restricted investment securities
Collections of receivables from related parties
Advances under receivables from related parties
Purchase of long-term investment
Purchases of property and equipment
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

2,381

1,247 

2,533 

1,592 

970 
(6,594)
17 
(140) 

(679)

532
(99)
(323)
(59)
(361)
1,939

377 
—
27 
295

(8)

(116)
—
(128)
37
521
359

676 

264

— 
—
49 
(228)

514

(1,242)
— 
(565)
(32)
125 
972 

(359)
(35,036)

252
(22,146)

(604) 
(14,789)

23,874
(8,556)
1,748
(1,208)
25
(1,277)
—
(3,769)
$ 10,837

29,686
(33,212)
4,174
(4,500)
—
(1,000)
—
(5,429)
$(10,281)

26,147
(55,577)
1,950
(3,700)
—
—
(624)
(2,090)
$(33,894)

C A S H   F L OW S   F R O M   F I N A N C I N G  A C T I V I T I E S
Principal payments under capital leases
Principal payments under long-term debt
Increase in deferred rent
Increase in long-term debt
Payment of preferred dividend
Payments received on subscriptions receivable
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock
Net proceeds from issuance of preferred stock
Net proceeds from sale of subsidiary’s equity to minority interests
Net cash provided by financing activities
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

(324)
(53)
—
—
—
82
11,532
—
21,242
32,479
8,280
7,307
$15,587

(280)
(47)
—
—
—
230
37,033
—
—
36,936
4,509
2,798
$ 7,307

(163)
(32)
166
420
(73) 
—
42,730
6,164
—
49,212
529
2,269 
$ 2,798 

S U P P L E M E N TA L   D I S C L O S U R E   O F   C A S H   F L OW   I N F O R M AT I O N
Cash paid for interest

$      92

$    164

$    172 

S U P P L E M E N TA L   S C H E D U L E   O F   N O N - C A S H   I N V E S T I N G  A N D   F I N A N C I N G  A C T I V I T I E S
Property and equipment acquired under capital leases

$      56

$ 279

$ 246 

Non-cash charges for Series B Preferred Stock

$      —

$     —

$ 1,908

Conversion of preferred stock to common stock

$      —

$ 1,536

$ 4,334 

Effect of change in interest in subsidiary 

from issuance of subsidiary common stock

$  3,001

$     —

$     — 

Issuance of subsidiary stock and stock options for services rendered

$ 1,013

$     — 

$     —

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

N O T E S  T O   C O N S O L I D AT E D   F I N A N C I A L   S TAT E M E N T S  

N O T E S  T O   C O N S O L I D AT E D   F I N A N C I A L   S TAT E M E N T S   C O N T.

( D O L L A R S   I N   T H O U S A N D S   E X C E P T   P E R   S H A R E   I N F O R M A T I O N )

26

M V I S

( D O L L A R S   I N   T H O U S A N D S   E X C E P T   P E R   S H A R E   I N F O R M A T I O N )

27

M V I S

N O T E

| 1 |

T H E   C O M PA N Y

Microvision, Inc. (“the  Company”), a Washington  corporation, was  established  to  acquire, develop, manufacture  and  market 
retinal scanning display (“RSD”) technology, which projects images onto the retina of the eye. The Company has entered into
contracts with commercial and U.S. government customers to develop applications using the RSD technology. As part of these
contracts, the Company has produced and delivered several demonstrator units.The Company is working to commercialize the
RSD technology for potential defense, aviation, medical, industrial and consumer applications.

Lumera Corporation (“Lumera”), a majority owned subsidiary of Microvision, is a development stage company. Lumera was
established to develop, manufacture and market optical devices using organic non-linear electro-optical chromophore materials
(“Optical Materials”). Lumera is working to commercialize the devices for potential optical networking applications.

The Company believes that its cash, cash equivalent and investment securities balances totaling $33,700 at December 31,
2001, in addition to the $6,000 raised in March 2002, as described in Note 17, will satisfy its budgeted cash requirements for the
next 12 months based on the Company’s current operating plan. The Company’s operating plan calls for the addition of sales,
marketing, technical and other staff and the purchase of additional laboratory and production equipment.The operating plan also
provides for the development of strategic relationships with systems and equipment manufacturers that may require additional
investments by the Company.There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to the Company or that, if avail-
able, it will be available on terms acceptable to the Company on a timely basis. If adequate funds are not available to satisfy either
short-term or long-term capital requirements, the Company may be required to limit its operations substantially.The Company’s
capital requirements will depend on many factors, including, but not limited to, the rate at which the Company can, directly or
through  arrangements  with  OEMs, introduce  products  incorporating  the  retinal  scanning  display  technology  and  the  market
acceptance and competitive position of such products.

N O T E

| 2 |

S U M M A RY   O F   S I G N I F I C A N T  A C C O U N T I N G   P O L I C I E S

U S E   O F   E S T I M AT E S The  preparation  of  financial  statements  in  conformity  with  generally  accepted  accounting  principles
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclo-
sure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expens-
es during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The Company’s management has identified the following areas where significant estimates and assumptions have been made
in preparing the financial statements: revenue recognition, allowance for uncollectible receivables, valuation of minority interest
in a privately held company and potential losses from litigation.

P R I N C I P L E S   O F   C O N S O L I D AT I O N The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and Lumera.
As of December 31, 2001 Microvision owns 76% and 11% of the outstanding common stock and mandatorily redeemable con-
vertible preferred stock of Lumera, respectively. The balance of Lumera is owned by public companies and private investors,
directors, Microvision employees and the University of Washington (“UW”). Lumera’s losses were first allocated to its common
shareholders until such losses exceeded its common equity and then to its preferred shareholders pro rata in accordance with
their respective ownership interest. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

C A S H , C A S H   E Q U I VA L E N T S  A N D   I N V E S T M E N T   S E C U R I T I E S The Company considers all investments that mature within 90
days of the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.

Short-term investment securities are primarily debt securities.The Company has classified its entire investment portfolio as
available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities are stated at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included in other compre-
hensive income (loss). Dividend and interest income are recognized when earned. Realized gains and losses are presented sepa-
rately on the income statement.The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method.

R E S T R I C T E D   C A S H The current portion of restricted cash represents a certificate of deposit held as collateral for a letter of
credit issued to secure payment on a fixed asset purchase.

The long-term portion of restricted cash represents a certificate of deposit held as collateral for letters of credit issued in
connection with a lease agreement for the corporate headquarters building. Most of the balance is required to be maintained
for the term of the lease.

I N V E N T O RY Inventory consists of raw material, and work in process for the Company’s Nomad product. Inventory is record-
ed at the lower of cost or market with cost determined on the weighted-average method.

L O N G - T E R M   I N V E S T M E N T In December 1999, the Company invested $624 in Gemfire Corporation (“Gemfire”), a privately
held  corporation. Gemfire  is  a  developer  of  diode  laser  components  for  display  applications. The  Company  accounts  for  the
investment in Gemfire using the cost method.

P R O P E R T Y  A N D   E Q U I P M E N T Property and equipment is stated at cost and depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the
assets (three to five years) using the straight-line method. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of esti-
mated useful lives or the lease term.

R E V E N U E   R E C O G N I T I O N Revenue has primarily been generated from contracts for further development of the RSD tech-
nology and to produce demonstration units for commercial enterprises and the United States government. Revenue on such
contracts is recorded using the percentage-of-completion method measured on a cost incurred basis. Changes in contract per-
formance, contract conditions, and estimated profitability, including those arising from contract penalty provisions, and final con-
tract settlements, may result in revisions to costs and revenues and are recognized in the period in which the revisions are deter-
mined. Profit incentives are included in revenue when realization is assured.

The Company recognizes losses, if any, as soon as identified. Losses occur when the estimated direct and indirect costs to
complete the contract exceed unrecognized revenue.The Company evaluates the reserve for contract losses on a contract-by-
contract basis.

Revenue for product shipments is recognized upon acceptance of the product by the customer or expiration of the con-
tractual acceptance period.There are no rights of return on product shipments. Provision is made for warranties at the time rev-
enue is recorded.

C O N C E N T R AT I O N   O F   C R E D I T   R I S K  A N D   S A L E S  T O   M A J O R   C U S T O M E R S Financial instruments that potentially subject the
Company to concentrations of credit risk are primarily cash equivalents, investments and accounts receivable.The Company typ-
ically does not require collateral from its customers. The Company has a cash investment policy that generally restricts invest-
ments to ensure preservation of principal and maintenance of liquidity.

The United States government accounted for approximately 93%, 91% and 82% of total revenue during 2001, 2000 and 1999,
respectively. Three commercial enterprises represented 6%, 5% and 16% of total revenues during 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively.

I N C O M E  TA X E S The Company provides for income taxes under the principles of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(“SFAS”) No. 109, which requires that provisions be made for taxes currently due and for the expected future tax effects of tem-
porary differences between book and tax bases of assets and liabilities and for loss and credit carry forwards.

N E T   L O S S   P E R   S H A R E Basic net loss per share is calculated on the basis of the weighted-average number of common shares
outstanding during the periods. Net loss per share assuming dilution is calculated on the basis of the weighted-average number
of common shares outstanding and the dilutive effect of all potential common stock equivalents and convertible securities. Net
loss per share assuming dilution for 2001, 2000 and 1999 is equal to basic net loss per share because the effect of potential com-
mon stock equivalents outstanding during the periods, including convertible preferred stock, options and warrants computed
using the treasury stock method, is anti-dilutive.The common stock equivalents and convertible securities that were not includ-
ed in the earnings per share were 5,672,000, 3,517,000 and 3,365,000 at December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

R E S E A R C H  A N D   D E V E L O P M E N T Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. As described in Note 7, Lumera
issued shares of its common stock in connection with a research agreement the value of these shares is amortized over the peri-
od of the research agreement.

F A I R  VA L U E   O F   F I N A N C I A L   I N S T R U M E N T S The Company’s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, invest-
ment securities, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, derivative instruments, long-term debt and capital lease
obligations. Except for capital leases and long-term debt, the carrying amounts of financial instruments approximate fair value due
to their short maturities. The carrying amount of capital leases and long-term debt at December 31, 2001 and 2000 was not
materially different from the fair value based on rates available for similar types of arrangements.

D E R I VAT I V E S The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading purposes. The purpose of the
Company’s  hedging  activities  is  to  reduce  the  risk  that  the  eventual  cash  flows  of  the  underlying  assets  and  liabilities  will  be
adversely affected by changes in exchange rates. Counterparties to derivative financial instruments expose the Company to 
credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance. However, the Company has entered into these instruments with credit-
worthy financial institutions and considers the risk of nonperformance to be remote. As of December 31, 2001 the Company
has an open contract to purchase 12.7 million Yen (approximately $100) in connection with a firm purchase commitment by the
Company. The transaction is accounted for as a foreign currency cash flow hedge as defined by FAS 133. Changes in the fair value
of the derivative instrument are (1) initially reported as a component of other comprehensive income outside earnings and (2)
later reclassified as earnings in the same period during which the hedged transaction affects earnings.There were no changes in
the fair value of its derivative instruments at December 31, 2001.

L O N G - L I V E D   A S S E T S The Company periodically evaluates the recoverability of its long-lived assets based on expected undis-
counted cash flows and recognizes impairment of the carrying value of long-lived assets, if any, based on the fair value of such assets.

S T O C K - B A S E D   C O M P E N S AT I O N The  Company  accounts  for  stock-based  employee  compensation  arrangements  in  accor-
dance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25,“Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”
and  related  amendments  and  interpretations, including  FASB  Interpretation  Number  (“FIN”)  44, “Accounting  for  Certain
Transactions  Involving  Stock  Compensation,”  and  complies  with  the  disclosure  provisions  of  SFAS  No. 123, “Accounting  for
Stock-Based Compensation.” The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to non-employees in accordance with the
provisions of SFAS No. 123 and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 96-18.

M V I S

( D O L L A R S   I N   T H O U S A N D S   E X C E P T   P E R   S H A R E   I N F O R M A T I O N )

28

M V I S

( D O L L A R S   I N   T H O U S A N D S   E X C E P T   P E R   S H A R E   I N F O R M A T I O N )

29

N O T E S  T O   C O N S O L I D AT E D   F I N A N C I A L   S TAT E M E N T S   C O N T.

N O T E S  T O   C O N S O L I D AT E D   F I N A N C I A L   S TAT E M E N T S   C O N T.

N E W   A C C O U N T I N G   P R O N O U N C E M E N T S The  Company  adopted  SFAS  No. 133 “Accounting  for  Derivatives  and  Hedging
Activities” in the quarter ended March 31, 2001. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations”. This state-
ment provides accounting and reporting standards for business combinations initiated subsequent to June 30, 2002. All business
combinations in the scope of this statement are to be accounted for under one method, the purchase method.

In July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 142,“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”.This statement provides accounting and
reporting standards for intangible assets acquired individually, with a group of other assets, or as part of a business combination.This
statement addresses the treatment of acquired goodwill and other intangible assets after they have been initially recognized in
the financial statements. Under this statement, goodwill and other intangibles with indefinite useful lives, on a prospective basis, will
no longer be amortized, however will be tested for impairment at least annually, based on a fair value comparison. Intangibles that
have finite useful lives will continue to be amortized over their respective useful lives.This statement also requires expanded dis-
closure for goodwill and other intangible assets.The Company will be required to adopt this statement no later than January 1, 2002.
As the Company has no recorded goodwill or intangible assets, there will be no initial effect from adoption of this standard.

In July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143,“Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations”.This statement provides account-
ing  and  reporting  standards  for  costs  associated  with  the  retirement  of  long-lived  assets. This  statement  requires  entities  to
record the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred.When the liability is ini-
tially recorded, the entity capitalizes a cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Over time, the lia-
bility is accreted to its present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset.
Upon settlement of the liability, an entity either settles the obligation for its recorded amount or incurs a gain or loss upon set-
tlement. Adoption of this statement is required no later than January 1, 2003. The Company is currently assessing the impact of
this statement on its results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

In October 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”. This
statement replaces SFAS No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed
Of”. FAS 144 retains the fundamental provisions of SFAS No. 121 for recognition and measurement of the impairment of long-
lived assets to be held and used and for measurement of long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale.This statement applies to all
long-lived  assets, including  discounted  operations, and  replaces  the  provisions  of APB  Opinion  No. 30, “Reporting  Results  of
Operations-Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business”, for the disposal of segments of a business.This state-
ment requires that those long-lived assets be measured at the lower of carrying amount of fair value less cost to sell, whether
reported in continuing operations or in discontinued operations. Microvision will be required to adopt this statement no later
than January 1, 2002. The implementation of SFAS 144 will not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations,
financial position or cash flows.

N O T E

| 3 |

L O N G  T E R M   C O N T R A C T S

Cost and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts comprises amounts of revenue recognized on con-
tracts that the Company has not yet billed to customers because the amounts were not contractually billable at December 31,
2001 and 2000. The Company will be contractually able to bill 93% and 94% of the balance at December 31, 2001 and 2000,
respectively, within 30 days of the respective year-end.

In April 2001, the Company entered into a $2,900 contract modification with the U.S. Army’s Aviation Applied Technology
Directorate to continue work on an advanced helmet-mounted display and imaging system to be used in the Virtual Cockpit
Optimization  Program. In  addition, the  Company  entered  into  a  $4,200  contract  modification  with  the  U.S. Army’s Aircrew
Integrated Helmet Systems Program office to further advance the form and functional development of a helmet-mounted display.
In October 2001, the Company entered into a $1,500 subcontract with Concurrent Technologies Corporation in support of
the Office of Naval Research’s Battlespace Information Display Technology program. The purpose of the program is to develop
micro-electrical mechanical systems for use in displaying information on the battlefield.

In December 2001, the Company entered into a $3,300 contract with the U.S. Army’s Medical Research Acquisition Activities
Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center for the initial phase in the development of a mobile wireless personal
display system for medical applications.

The Company’s current contracts with the U.S. government are primarily cost plus fixed fee type contracts. Under the terms
of a cost plus fixed fee contract the U.S. government reimburses the Company for negotiated actual direct and indirect cost
incurred in performing the contracted services.The Company is under no obligation to spend more than the contract value to
complete the contracted services.The period of performance is generally one year.

During 2000, the Company entered into a $5.0 million contract with the U.S. Army’s Aviation Applied Technology Directorate
to continue work on an advanced helmet-mounted display and imaging system to be used in the Virtual Cockpit Optimization
Program. In addition, the Company was awarded a $2.8 million contract with the U.S. Army’s Aircrew Integrated Helmet Systems
Program office to further advance the form and functional development of a helmet-mounted display.

During 2000, the Company entered into a $600,000 contract to provide a Nomad demonstrator unit and a full-color pro-
totype display to the Cleveland Clinic. The Company has sold four additional Nomad demonstration units to customers in the
medical and industrial markets during 2000.

The following table summarizes the cost incurred on the Company’s revenue contracts:

D E C E M B E R   3 1 ,

2001

2000

Costs incurred on uncompleted contracts
Billings on uncompleted contracts

Included in accompanying balance sheets under the following captions

Costs in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts
Billings in excess of costs on uncompleted contracts

N O T E

| 4 |

I N V E S T M E N T S  AVA I L A B L E - F O R - S A L E

$ 23,587
(22,063)
$   1,524 

$ 13,824
(12,127)
$   1,697

$   1,584
(60)
$   1,524

$   2,116
(419)
$   1,697

The following table summarizes the composition of the Company’s available-for-sale investment securities at December 31, 2001
and 2000.

D E C E M B E R   3 1 ,

2001

2000

U.S. corporate debt securities
U.S. government agency debt securities

$15,262
2,803
$18,065

$18,532
14,878
$33,410

The fair value of the available-for-sale investment securities by contractual maturity at December 31, 2001 is as follows:

Due in one year or less
Due in one year through two years
Due in two years through three years

N O T E

| 5 |

A C C R U E D   L I A B I L I T I E S

Accrued liabilities consist of the following:

Fair Value

$  8,267
6,145
3,653
$18,065

D E C E M B E R   3 1 ,

2001

2000

Bonuses
Payroll and payroll taxes
Subcontractors
Compensated absences
Relocation
Taxes
Professional fees
Other

$1,111
865
774 
371
329
324
227
297
$4,298

$  657
564
470
225
130
163
80
70
$2,359

N O T E S  T O   C O N S O L I D AT E D   F I N A N C I A L   S TAT E M E N T S   C O N T.

N O T E S  T O   C O N S O L I D AT E D   F I N A N C I A L   S TAT E M E N T S   C O N T.

( D O L L A R S   I N   T H O U S A N D S   E X C E P T   P E R   S H A R E   I N F O R M A T I O N )

30

M V I S

( D O L L A R S   I N   T H O U S A N D S   E X C E P T   P E R   S H A R E   I N F O R M A T I O N )

31

M V I S

N O T E

| 6 |

P R O P E R T Y  A N D   E Q U I P M E N T, N E T

Property and equipment consist of the following:

D E C E M B E R   3 1 ,

2001

2000

Lab equipment
Leasehold improvements
Computer hardware and software
Office furniture and equipment

Less: Accumulated depreciation

$ 5,318
4,356
3,209 
1,021
13,904
(4,944)
$ 8,960

$ 3,278
3,800
2,214
787
10,079
(2,563)
$ 7,516

N O T E

| 7 |

R E C E I VA B L E S   F R O M   R E L AT E D   PA R T I E S

In 2000, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to provide an unsecured line of credit to each of the Company’s three
executive directors.The limit of the line of credit is three times the executives’ base salary less any amounts outstanding under
the Executive Option Exercise Loan Plan. In 2001, the Board of Directors authorized a $500 addition to the limit for one exec-
utive, and expanded the group of eligible executives to four.The lines of credit carry interest rates of 5.4% to 6.2%.The lines of
credit must be repaid within one year of the earlier of the executive’s termination or plan termination. At December 31, 2001,
a total of $2,252 and $1,000, respectively, was outstanding under the lines of credit.

In 2000, three executive officers of the Company exercised a total of 128,284 stock options, in exchange for full recourse
notes totaling $285.These notes bear interest at 4.6% to 6.2% per annum. Each note is payable in full upon the earliest of (1) a
fixed date ranging from January 31, 2001 to December 31, 2004 depending on the expiration of the options exercised; (2) the
sale of all of the shares acquired with the note; (3) on a pro rata basis upon the partial sale of shares acquired with the note, or
(4) within 90 days of the officer’s termination of employment. The notes are included as subscriptions receivable from related
parties in shareholders’ equity on the consolidated balance sheet.

The interest on both the lines of credit and the full recourse notes is forgiven if the executive is an employee of the Company
at December 31 of the respective year. Compensation expense of $116 and $44 was recognized in 2001 and 2000, respectively,
for interest forgiven.

N O T E

| 8 |

L U M E R A   S U B S I D I A RY   E Q U I T Y  T R A N S A C T I O N S

In  March  2000, Lumera  issued  4,700,000  shares  of  its  Class  B  common  stock  to  the  Company  for  services  provided  by  the
Company to Lumera of $94. At the same time, Lumera issued 670,000 shares of its Class B common stock to certain executives
of the Company for $12 in cash. Shares of Lumera Class B common stock have ten votes per share.

In January 2001, Lumera issued 802,414 shares of Lumera Class A common stock to the UW at a value of $3.75 per share
in connection with a research agreement described in Note 13. Shares of Lumera Class A common stock have one vote per
share.The valuation of the shares issued to the UW was more than the per share carrying amount of the Company’s interest in
Lumera. Although the Company’s percentage ownership in Lumera was reduced as a result of this transaction, the increased value
of Lumera stock created a gain for the Company on the change in ownership interest.The amount of the gain of $3,001 result-
ing from the revaluation of the Company’s interest in Lumera was credited to paid-in capital.

In March 2001, Lumera issued 2,400,000 shares of its Series A preferred stock at a price of $10.00 per share. Included in this
total were 264,000 shares issued to the Company in repayment of intercompany borrowings. The Lumera Series A preferred
stock is convertible into shares of Lumera Class A common stock and has voting rights equivalent to the Class A common stock.
Holders of the Lumera Series A preferred stock are entitled to receive noncumulative dividends at a rate of $0.60 per share per
annum, when and if declared by Lumera’s Board of Directors. On any liquidation of Lumera, each holder of Lumera Series A 
preferred stock is entitled to receive an amount of $10 per share in preference to any distribution to the holders of Lumera
common stock. Upon full payment of the Series A preferences, the holders of Lumera preferred and common stock share in any
further distributions based on the number of shares of common stock held (on an as converted basis) until the holders of the
Lumera Series A preferred stock receive an aggregate of $30.00 per share.Thereafter, any remaining funds and assets of Lumera
are distributed pro rata among the holders of the common stock.

Losses in Lumera are first allocated to the holders of the common stock and then to the holders of the preferred share-
holders pro rata in accordance with their respective ownership interest. Losses are not allocated to the options and warrants
until exercised.

Lumera common stock and Series A preferred stock are eliminated in consolidation with Microvision interests in Lumera
common stock and Series A preferred stock and options and warrants to purchase equity in Lumera held by investors other
than the Company, and are presented as minority interests on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. A reconciliation of the
movements in minority interests is as follows:

Microvision

Other Common

Other Preferred

Total

Minority Interests

$     94
(2,892)
(2,798)

3,001
2,640
719
(3,045)
$   517

$

13
(13)

3,009
(3,001)

168
(8)
$ 168

$      —

21,242

(6,586)
$14,656

$    107
(2,905)
(2,798)
3,009
—
23,882
887
(9,639)
$15,341

Balance at inception
Loss allocation for 2000
Balance at December 31, 2000
Issuance of common stock to UW
Change in interest
Issuance of preferred stock, net
Options and warrants
Loss allocation for 2001
Balance at December 31, 2001

N O T E

| 9 |

P R E F E R R E D   S T O C K

In January 1999, the Company raised $5,000 (before issuance costs) from the sale of 5,000 shares of Series B-1 convertible pre-
ferred stock to a private investor, who was also a director, in a private placement. The preferred stock was immediately con-
vertible into common stock at a rate of $12.50 in preferred stock per common share and carried a cumulative dividend of 4%
per annum, payable in cash or additional convertible preferred stock at the election of the Company.The investor also acquired
an option to purchase an additional 1,600 shares of Series B-2 convertible preferred stock with an exercise price of $16.00 per
share with a six-month maturity and an option to purchase an additional 1,920 shares of Series B-3 convertible preferred stock
with an exercise price of $19.20 per share with a nine-month maturity from the closing date of the transaction.

The conversion prices of the Series B-1 and Series B-2 convertible preferred stock were less than the closing prices of the
Company’s common stock on the dates of commitment to purchase the preferred stock.This beneficial conversion feature was
valued at $1,800. This “discount” is treated as a preferred stock dividend and recorded to accumulated deficit over the period
between the date of sale and the date on which the preferred stock first becomes convertible. Because the preferred stock was
immediately convertible, the entire value of the beneficial conversion feature was recorded as a dividend in 1999.

In October 1999, the Company amended the option to purchase 1,920 shares of the Series B-3 Convertible preferred stock
to extend the expiration date of the option to June 30, 2000. In consideration of the extension, the holder waived the right to
receive dividends on the outstanding Series B-2 convertible preferred stock.The terms of the option were also amended to an
option to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at a conversion price of $19.20. The amendment was accounted for as a
preferred stock dividend with a fair market value of $154.

In March 2000, the Company redeemed 1,600 shares of Series B-2 mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred stock and

issued 100,000 shares of common stock.

M V I S

N O T E

| 10 |

N O T E S  T O   C O N S O L I D AT E D   F I N A N C I A L   S TAT E M E N T S   C O N T.

N O T E S  T O   C O N S O L I D AT E D   F I N A N C I A L   S TAT E M E N T S   C O N T.

( D O L L A R S   I N   T H O U S A N D S   E X C E P T   P E R   S H A R E   I N F O R M A T I O N )

32

M V I S

( D O L L A R S   I N   T H O U S A N D S   E X C E P T   P E R   S H A R E   I N F O R M A T I O N )

33

C O M M O N   S T O C K

The following table summarizes activity with respect to warrants for the three years ended December 31, 2001:

In April 2000, the Company raised $25,000 (before issuance costs) from the issuance of 500,000 shares of common stock to
Cree, Inc. and  General  Electric  Pension Trust. Concurrently, the  Company  entered  into  a  two-year, $10,000  extension  of  the
development agreement with Cree.The Company was required to pay $4,500 during the first year of the extension in four equal
quarterly payments.The first payment was made concurrently with the signing of the extension. During the second year of the
extension, the Company is required to pay the remaining $5,500 in four equal quarterly payments.

In June 2000, the Company raised $1,900 (before issuance costs) from the exercise, by an investor, of a warrant to purchase

100,000 shares of common stock at a price of $19.20 per share.

As described in Note 13, in February 2001, the Company issued 37,000 shares of common stock valued at $1,000 to the UW
in  connection  with  the  purchase  of  an  Exclusive  License Agreement. In  October  2001, the  Company  raised  $11,000  (before
issuance costs) upon issuance of 971,000 shares of common stock to a group of private investors. The investors also acquired
fully vested warrants to purchase an aggregate of 146,000 shares of common stock at a price of $14.62 per share for a period
of four years.

From 1996 until October 2001, the Company had a stock grant plan for its independent directors (“Directors Stock Plan”).
The Directors Stock Plan provided for granting up to a total of 75,000 shares of common stock to non-employee directors of
the Company. The Directors Stock Plan was terminated in October 2001 effective as of the vesting date of the annual awards
granted as of the June 6, 2001 annual shareholder meeting.

N O T E

| 11|

WA R R A N T S

In April 1999, the Company issued two fully vested warrants to purchase common stock in connection with a sale of common
stock.The first warrant provides the holder the right to purchase up to 418,848 shares of common stock at a price of $17.91
per share until April 1, 2000.The first warrant was exercised in full on April 1, 2000.The second warrant provides the holder the
right to purchase up to 145,495 shares of common stock at a price of $19.05 per share until April 1, 2004.The value of the war-
rants of $3,690 was determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with a dividend yield of zero percent, expected
volatility of 83%, risk free interest rate of 5.6% and expected lives of one and 2.3 years for the first and second warrants, respec-
tively.The value of the warrants was accounted for as issuance cost of the common stock and charged directly to common stock.
On April 11, 2000, the Company received $7,500 (before issuance costs) upon exercise of a warrant to purchase 419,000
shares of common stock at a price of $17.91 per share. In December 2000, the Company issued fully vested warrants to pur-
chase 5,000 shares of common stock, for $61.13 per share, to a consultant in payment of fees arising from this transaction.

On August 10, 2000, the Company issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 200,000 shares of common stock to two
consultants in connection with entering into certain consulting agreements with the Company. One of the consultants subse-
quently became a director.The warrants grant each of the holders the right to purchase up to 100,000 shares of common stock
at a price of $34.00 per share. The warrants to purchase an aggregate of 150,000 shares vest over three years and are subject
to remeasurement at each balance sheet date during the vesting period. The remaining warrants to purchase an aggregate of
50,000 shares had a measurement date at the time of grant.The deferred compensation related to these warrants is being amor-
tized to non-cash compensation expense over the five-year period of service under the agreements.The total original value of
both warrants was estimated at $5,476. Due to stock price fluctuations, the subsequent values for those warrants subject to
remeasurement were estimated at $3,441 and $3,740 as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively.Total non-cash amortiza-
tion expense was $775 and $345 for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively.The fair values of the warrants
were estimated at December 31, 2001, 2000, and the issue date, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the follow-
ing weighted-average assumptions: dividend yield of zero percent; and expected volatility of 83% for all measurement dates; risk-
free interest rates of 5.9%, 6.0% and 6.0%; and expected lives of 9.2, 10 and 10 years.

D O L L A R S   I N   T H O U S A N D S

Outstanding at December 31, 1998
Granted:

Exercise price greater than fair value
Exercise price less than fair value

Exercised
Canceled / expired

Outstanding at December 31, 1999
Granted:

Exercise price greater than fair value
Exercise price less than fair value

Exercised
Canceled / expired

Outstanding at December 31, 2000
Granted:

Exercise price greater than fair value
Exercise price less than fair value

Exercised
Canceled / expired

Shares Weighted-average
Exercise Price

(in thousands)

2,606

$11.78

622
31
(2,533) 
(22)

704

255
6
(485) 
(17)

463

158
1
(7) 
—

18.31
13.20
11.86
11.77

17.30

38.25
19.20
17.12
15.26

29.11

14.62
8.00
11.57
—

Outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2001

615

$25.55

The following table summarizes information about the weighted-average fair value of warrants granted:

Y E A R   E N D E D   D E C E M B E R   3 1 ,

2001

2000

1999

Exercise price greater than fair value
Exercise price less than fair value

$ 5.82
18.39

$ 15.43
36.57

$ 6.73
10.24

The following table summarizes information about warrants outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2001:

R A N G E   O F   E X E R C I S E   P R I C E S

$8.00
$12.50 – $16.00
$19.05 – $20.32
$34.00
$53.00 – $61.13
$8.00 – $61.13

Warrants Outstanding and Exercisable

Number
Outstanding at
Dec. 31, 2001
(in thousands)

Weighted-avg.
Remaining
Contractual
Life (years)

Weighted-
average
Exercise
Price

12
176
172
200
55
615

0.02
3.55
2.29
8.61
3.32

$ 8.00
$14.52
$19.21
$34.00
$53.73

The fair value of the warrants granted was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with
the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively: dividend yield of zero percent
and expected volatility of 83% for all years; risk-free interest rates of 2.9%, 6.2% and 5.5%; and expected lives of 2, 2 and 1 years.

N O T E S  T O   C O N S O L I D AT E D   F I N A N C I A L   S TAT E M E N T S   C O N T.

N O T E S  T O   C O N S O L I D AT E D   F I N A N C I A L   S TAT E M E N T S   C O N T.

( D O L L A R S   I N   T H O U S A N D S   E X C E P T   P E R   S H A R E   I N F O R M A T I O N )

34

M V I S

( D O L L A R S   I N   T H O U S A N D S   E X C E P T   P E R   S H A R E   I N F O R M A T I O N )

35

M V I S

N OT E

| 12 |

O P T I O N S

The Company has various stock option plans (“Option Plans”) which provide for granting incentive stock options (“ISOs”) and
nonqualified stock options (“NSOs”) to employees, directors, officers and certain non-employees of the Company as determined
by the Board of Directors, or its designated committee (“Plan Administrator”).The shareholders have authorized issuing options
for the purchase of up to a total of 6,504,000 shares of the Company’s authorized but unissued common stock.The date of grant,
option price, vesting period and other terms specific to options granted under the Option Plans are determined by the Plan
Administrator. The Company deems the fair market value of its stock on any given trading day to be the closing price of its stock
on the Nasdaq National Market on that date.

Stock options issued under the Option Plans, other than the 2000 Independent Director Stock Option Plan (“the Director
Option Plan”), generally have vesting ranges from three years to four years; expiration ranges from five years to 10 years; and
exercise prices are set equal to the fair market value of the Company’s stock on the date of grant.

The Director Option Plan provides for an annual NSO grant to each independent director to purchase 5,000 shares of the
Company’s authorized but unissued common stock.A total of 150,000 shares are authorized shares under the plan. Options are
granted to new directors on their appointment dates and granted to continuing directors each year on the date of their re-elec-
tions to the Board of Directors. The options vest in full no later than the Company’s next regularly scheduled annual share-
holders’ meeting. The exercise price is equal to the average closing price of the Company’s common stock as reported on the
Nasdaq National Market during the ten trading days prior to the date of grant.The options expire ten years after of the date of
grant. Upon leaving the Board, a grant remains exercisable up through its expiration date.

During 2001 and 2000, the Company issued 462,000 and 91,000 options, respectively, outside of its stock option plans to
employees who are not executive officers of the Company. The terms and conditions of these options issued are the same as
those issued under the Option Plans, except for the vesting provisions of the grants issued in 2001. These grants vest 25% on
the grant date, 25% six months from the grant date, 25% one year from grant date and 25% eighteen months from grant date.
In October 2001, the Company granted, subject to shareholder approval, 127,000 options to independent directors. As the
issuance of these options is contingent upon shareholder approval no deferred compensation or non-cash compensation amor-
tization expense related to these options has been recorded during the year-ended December 31, 2001.

The following table summarizes activity with respect to options for the three years ended December 31, 2001:

D O L L A R S   I N   T H O U S A N D S

Outstanding at December 31, 1998
Granted:

Exercise price greater than fair value
Exercise price equal to fair value

Exercised
Forfeited

Outstanding at December 31, 1999
Granted:

Exercise price greater than fair value
Exercise price equal to fair value
Exercise price less than fair value

Exercised
Forfeited

Outstanding at December 31, 2000
Granted:

Exercise price greater than fair value
Exercise price equal to fair value
Exercise price less than fair value

Exercised
Forfeited
Outstanding at December 31, 2001
Exercisable at December 31, 2001

Shares  Weighted-average
Exercise Price

(in thousands)

2,365

$ 12.75

326 
380
(431)
(178)

2,462

5 
1,235
85
(519)
(214)

3,054

1,566 
934
70
(92)
(475)
5,057
1,980

25.90
21.33
7.45
17.90

16.38

39.74
33.94
35.58
7.49
29.38

24.65

18.35
19.24
13.52
11.85
27.30
$21.52
$18.32

The following table summarizes information about the weighted-average fair value of options granted:

Y E A R   E N D E D   D E C E M B E R   3 1 ,

2001

2000

1999

Exercise price greater than fair value
Exercise price equal to fair value
Exercise price less than fair value

$ 8.89
12.84
8.68

$16.09
23.70
25.81

$ 9.31
14.88
—

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2001:

R A N G E   O F   E X E R C I S E   P R I C E S

$6.00 – $8.44
$8.50 – $16.53
$16.56 – $26.25
$26.38 – $40.88
$42.94 – $61.13
$6.00 – $61.13

Options Outstanding

Options Exercisable

Number
Outstanding at
Dec. 31, 2001
(in thousands)

Weighted-avg.
Remaining
Contractual
Life (years)

Weighted-
average
Exercise
Price

Number
Exercisable at
Dec. 31, 2001
(in thousands)

Weighted-
average
Exercise
Price

266
1,854
1,455
1,442
40
5,057

2.05
9.06
7.96
8.25
8.29

$  6.73
$ 14.45
$21.23
$32.83
$50.21

266
779
585
340
10
1,980

$  6.73
$ 14.04
$20.48
$32.48
$50.39

Deferred compensation of $0, $1,840 and $137 was recorded during 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively, for stock options

granted to employees and directors at exercise prices below fair market value.

L U M E R A   S U B S I D I A RY   S T O C K   O P T I O N   P L A N S In 2000, Lumera adopted the 2000 Stock Option Plan (the “Lumera Plan”).
The Lumera Plan provides for the granting of stock options to employees, consultants and non-employee directors of Lumera.
Lumera has reserved 3,000,000 shares of Class A common stock for issuance pursuant to the Lumera Plan.The terms and con-
ditions of any options granted, including date of grant, the exercise price and vesting period are to be determined by the Plan
Administrator. Stock options issued under the Lumera Plan generally vest over four years and expire after ten years.

In September 2001, Lumera issued fully vested options to purchase 33,300 shares of Class A common stock at an exercise
price of $10.00 per share to a consultant for services completed. The options expire 10 years following the date of issue. The
options were valued at $137,000 on the grant date, are not subject to remeasurement and were fully expensed in the period
granted.The estimated fair value was determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
underlying security fair market value of $5.34, dividend yield of zero percent, expected volatility of 80%, risk-free interest rate of
4.0%, expected life of 10 years.

The following table summarizes activity with respect to Lumera options for the two years ended December 31, 2001:

D O L L A R S   I N   T H O U S A N D S

Granted:

Exercise price greater than fair value
Exercise price equal to fair value

Exercised
Forfeited

Outstanding at December 31, 2000
Granted:

Exercise price greater than fair value
Exercise price equal to fair value

Exercised
Forfeited

Outstanding at December 31, 2000
Exercisable at December 31, 2001

Shares Weighted-average
Exercise Price

(in thousands)

42
125
—
—

167

412
99
—
(43)

635
65

$2.00
0.68
—
—

1.01

10.00
4.23
—
0.76

$7.36
$5.70

M V I S

( D O L L A R S   I N   T H O U S A N D S   E X C E P T   P E R   S H A R E   I N F O R M A T I O N )

36

M V I S

( D O L L A R S   I N   T H O U S A N D S   E X C E P T   P E R   S H A R E   I N F O R M A T I O N )

37

N O T E S  T O   C O N S O L I D AT E D   F I N A N C I A L   S TAT E M E N T S   C O N T.

N O T E S  T O   C O N S O L I D AT E D   F I N A N C I A L   S TAT E M E N T S   C O N T.

Lumera options outstanding at December 31, 2001 had a weighted average contractual life of 9.4 years.

F A I R  VA L U E   D I S C L O S U R E S Had compensation cost for options issued been determined using the fair values at the grant dates
consistent with the methodology prescribed under SFAS 123, the Company’s consolidated net loss available to common share-
holders and associated net loss per share would have increased to the pro forma amounts indicated below:

Y E A R   E N D E D   D E C E M B E R   3 1 ,

2001

2000

1999

N E T   L O S S  AVA I L A B L E   F O R   C O M M O N   S H A R E H O L D E R S
As reported
Pro forma

N E T   L O S S   P E R   S H A R E
As reported
Pro forma

$(34,794)
$(53,130)

$(26,601)
$(39,449)

$(16,700)
$(20,236)

$    (2.85)
$    (4.35)

$   (2.33)
$   (3.45)

$   (2.04)
$   (2.48)

The fair value of the options granted was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with
the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively: dividend yield of zero percent;
and expected volatility of 83% for all years; risk-free interest rates of 4.1%, 6.1% and 5.5% and expected lives of 4, 5 and 5 years.
Actual forfeitures of 15.5% and 8.7% were used for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively. An assumed for-
feiture rate of 5% was used for 1999.

The fair value of the options granted by Lumera was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing
model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants in 2001 and 2000, respectively: dividend yield of zero
percent and expected volatility of zero percent for all years; risk-free interest rates of 4.5% and 6.0%; and expected lives of 6 and
7 years. Actual forfeitures of 10% and zero percent were used for the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

N O T E

| 13 |

C O M M I T M E N T S  A N D   C O N T I N G E N C I E S

In  October  1993, the  Company  entered  into  a  Research
A G R E E M E N T S   W I T H   T H E   U N I V E R S I T Y   O F   WA S H I N G T O N
Agreement and an exclusive license agreement (“License Agreement”) with the UW. The License Agreement grants the Company
the  rights  to  certain  intellectual  property, including  the  technology  subsequently  developed  under  the  Microvision  research
agreement (“Research Agreement”), whereby the Company has an exclusive, royalty-bearing license to make, use and sell or sub-
license the licensed technology. In consideration for the license, the Company agreed to pay a one-time nonrefundable license
issue fee of $5,134. Payments under the Research Agreement were credited to the license fee. In addition to the nonrefundable
fee, which has been paid in full, the Company is required to pay certain on going royalties. In 2000 and 1999 these royalties were
not material. Beginning in 2001, the Company is required to pay the UW a nonrefundable license maintenance fee of $10 per
quarter, to be credited against royalties due.

In March 1994, the Company entered into an exclusive license agreement (“HALO Agreement”) with the UW.This technolo-
gy  involves  the  projection  of  data  and  images  onto  the  inside  of  a  dome  that  is  placed  over  the  viewer’s  head. The  HALO
Agreement grants the Company the exclusive right to market the technical information for the purpose of commercial exploita-
tion. Under the agreement, the Company was obligated to pay to the UW $75 and issue 31,250 shares of common stock upon
filing of the first patent application and $100 and issue 62,500 shares of common stock upon issuance of the first patent award-
ed. In 1999, the UW filed a patent application under the HALO Agreement and the Company recorded $452 as an expense based
on the value of the 31,250 shares of common stock on the patent filing date and the $75 cash payment, as an expense.The shares
of common stock were issued and the cash payment was made in February 2000.

In February 2001, the Company entered into an amendment to the HALO Agreement, whereby it purchased the rights to
HALO display technology from the UW for an additional cash payment of $100 and 37,000 shares of Microvision common stock
valued at the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the amendment.The Company recorded $1,100, the
total value of the shares of common stock and the cash payment, as a research and development expense.

In  October  2000, Lumera  entered  into  an  exclusive  license  agreement  (“Lumera  License Agreement”)  and  a  Sponsored
Research Agreement with the UW. The Lumera License Agreement grants Lumera exclusive rights to certain intellectual prop-
erty including technology being developed under the Sponsored Research Agreement whereby Lumera has an exclusive royalty-
bearing  license  to  make, use, sell  or  sublicense  the  licensed  technology. In  consideration  for  the  Lumera  License Agreement,
Lumera agreed to pay a one-time nonrefundable license issue fee of $200 to the UW, which was expensed as research and devel-
opment, as there are no known alternative uses for the technology.

Under the terms of the Sponsored Research Agreement, Lumera issued 802,414 shares of Lumera’s Class A common stock.
The shares were vested in full by mutual agreement between the UW and Lumera on January 8, 2001.The estimated fair value
of the shares issued was $3,009 and has been recorded as prepaid research and development expense, and will be amortized
over the term of the research plan. Amortization expense of $844 was recorded in 2001.The balance in prepaid research expens-
es at December 31, 2001 was $2,165.

In connection with the research plan, Lumera agreed to pay an aggregate of $9,000 in quarterly payments over three years.
Lumera  has  also  conditionally  committed  to  provide  $300  per  year  to  the  UW  during  the  three-year  term  of  the  Research
Agreement for additional research related to the Optical Materials.The first research payments were made upon Lumera’s accept-
ance of the UW research plan on February 26, 2001, and total payments of $2,550 were made during 2001.These payments are
recognized as research expense on a straight-line basis over the term of the Research Agreement. In February 2002, Lumera and
the UW restructured the Sponsored Research Agreement to extend quarterly payments and performance through 2005.

The following table reflects the revised payment schedule under the Sponsored Research Agreement:

2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Total

Research Plan
Annual
Payment

Optical
Materials
Payments

$2,250
1,125
3,000
2,250
375
$9,000

$250
300
300
50

$900

Total

$2,500
1,425
3,300
2,300
375
$9,900

Under the terms of the agreements, Lumera is also required to pay certain costs related to filing and processing of patents

and copyrights related to the agreements. Additionally, Lumera will pay certain ongoing royalties.

L I T I G AT I O N The Company is subject to various claims and pending or threatened lawsuits in the normal course of business.
Management believes that the outcome of any such lawsuits would not have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s finan-
cial position, results of operations or cash flows.

L E A S E   C O M M I T M E N T S The Company leases its office space and certain equipment under noncancelable capital and operating
leases with initial or remaining terms in excess of one year.The Company entered into a new facility lease that commenced in
April 1999, which includes an extension provision and rent escalation provisions over the seven-year term of the lease. Rent
expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.

Future minimum rental commitments under capital and operating leases for years ending December 31 are as follows:

2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Thereafter
Total minimum lease payments
Less: Amount representing interest
Present value of capital lease obligations
Less: Current portion
Long-term obligation at December 31, 2001

Capital Leases Operating Leases

$1,997
2,122
1,726
1,643
406
—
$7,894

$ 189
51
17
—
—
—
257
(26)
231
(170)
$  61

The capital leases are collateralized by the related assets financed and by security deposits held by the lessors under the lease
agreements. The  cost  and  accumulated  depreciation  of  equipment  under  capital  leases  was  $1,101  and  $592  respectively, at
December 31, 2001; $1,083 and $396, respectively, at December 31, 2000.

Rent expense was $1,557, $1,255 and $1,008, for 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

L O N G - T E R M   D E B T During 1999, the Company entered into a loan agreement with the lessor of the Company’s corporate
headquarters to finance $420 in tenant improvements.The loan carries a fixed interest rate of 10% per annum, is repayable over
the initial term of the lease and is secured by a letter of credit.

N O T E S  T O   C O N S O L I D AT E D   F I N A N C I A L   S TAT E M E N T S   C O N T.

N O T E S  T O   C O N S O L I D AT E D   F I N A N C I A L   S TAT E M E N T S   C O N T.

( D O L L A R S   I N   T H O U S A N D S   E X C E P T   P E R   S H A R E   I N F O R M A T I O N )

38

M V I S

( D O L L A R S   I N   T H O U S A N D S   E X C E P T   P E R   S H A R E   I N F O R M A T I O N )

39

M V I S

N O T E

| 14 |

I N C O M E  TA X E S

A provision for income taxes has not been recorded for 2001, 2000 or 1999 due to taxable losses incurred during such periods.
A valuation allowance has been recorded for deferred tax assets because realization is primarily dependent on generating suffi-
cient taxable income prior to expiration of net operating loss carry-forwards.

At December 31, 2001, the Company has net operating loss carry-forwards of approximately $94,200 for federal income tax
reporting purposes. In addition the Company has research and development tax credits of $1,826.The net operating losses will
expire from 2005 to 2021 if not previously utilized. In certain circumstances, as specified in the Internal Revenue Code, a 50%
or more ownership change by certain combinations of the Company’s stockholders during any three-year period would result
in limitations on the Company’s ability to utilize its net operating loss carry-forwards.The Company has determined that such a
change occurred during 1995 and the annual utilization of loss carry-forwards generated through the period of that change will
be limited to approximately $1,100. An additional change occurred in 1996; and the limitation for losses generated in 1996 is
approximately $1,600.

Lumera files a separate tax return. At December 31, 2001, Lumera has net operating loss carry-forwards of approximately $12,300
for federal income tax reporting purposes.The net operating losses will expire from 2020 through 2021 if not previously utilized.

Deferred tax assets are summarized as follows:

D E C E M B E R   3 1 ,

2001

2000

Net operating loss carry-forwards – Microvision
Net operating loss carry-forwards – Lumera
Research and development credit carry-forwards
Other

Less:Valuation allowance
Deferred tax assets

$ 32,012
4,186
1,827
1,946
39,971
(39,971)
—

$

$ 22,293
—
1,060
502
23,855
(23,855)
$       —

Certain net operating losses arise from the deductibility for tax purposes of compensation under nonqualified stock options
equal to the difference between the fair value of the stock on the date of exercise and the exercise price of the options. For finan-
cial reporting purposes, the tax effect of this deduction when recognized will be accounted for as a credit to shareholders’ equity.

N O T E

| 15 |

R E T I R E M E N T   S AV I N G S   P L A N

The Company has a retirement savings plan (“the Plan”) that qualifies under Internal Revenue Code Section 401(k).The Plan cov-
ers all qualified employees. Contributions to the Plan by the Company are made at the discretion of the Board of Directors.The
Company did not contribute to the Plan in 1999.

In February 2000, the Board of Directors approved a plan amendment to match 50% of employee contributions to the Plan
up to 6% of the employee’s per pay period compensation, starting on April 1, 2000. During 2001 and 2000, the Company con-
tributed $271 and $134, respectively, to the Plan under the matching program.

N O T E

| 16 |

Q U A R T E R LY   F I N A N C I A L   I N F O R M AT I O N   ( U N A U D I T E D )

The following table presents the Company’s unaudited quarterly financial information for the years ending December 31, 2001
and 2000:

Y E A R   E N D E D   D E C E M B E R   3 1 , 2 0 0 1

December 31

September 30

June 30

March 31

Revenue
Gross margin
Net loss 
Net loss per share – basic and diluted

$ 4,251
2,123
(7,809)
(.61)

$ 2,402
1,064
(8,198)
(.68)

$ 1,772
691
(8,567)
(.72)

$ 2,337
775
(10,220)
(.86)

Y E A R   E N D E D   D E C E M B E R   3 1 , 2 0 0 0

December 31

September 30

June 30

March 31

Revenue
Gross margin
Net loss
Net loss per share – basic and diluted

$ 2,865
857
(6,913)
(.58)

$ 1,971
254
(7,683)
(.65)

$ 1,176
292
(6,932)
(.60)

$ 2,110
642
(5,073)
(.48)

N O T E

| 17 |

S E G M E N T   I N F O R M AT I O N

The Company is organized into two major groups – Microvision, which is engaged in retinal scanning displays and related tech-
nologies, and Lumera, which is engaged in optical systems components technology.The segments were determined based on how
management views and evaluates the Company’s operations.

The  accounting  policies  used  to  derive  reportable  segment  results  are  generally  the  same  as  those  described  in  Note  2,

“Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”

A significant portion of the segments’ expenses arise from shared services and infrastructure that Microvision has provided
to the segments in order to realize economies of scale and to efficiently use resources.These efficiencies include costs of cen-
tralized legal, accounting, human resources, real estate, information technology services, treasury and other Microvision corpo-
rate and infrastructure costs.These expenses are allocated to the segments and the allocation has been determined on a basis
that the Company considered to be a reasonable reflection of the utilization of services provided to or benefits received by the
segments.

The following tables reflect the results of the Company’s reportable segments under the Company’s management system.
The performance of each segment is measured based on several metrics.These results are used, in part, by management, in eval-
uating the performance of, and in allocation of resources to, each of the segments.

Y E A R   E N D E D   D E C E M B E R   3 1 , 2 0 0 1

Microvision

Lumera

Elimination

Total

Revenues from external sources
Interest income
Interest expense
Depreciation
Segment loss
Segment assets
Purchases of capital assets

$ 9,902
2,593
92
1,531
31,749
44,606
1,897

$   860
377
447
850
9,639
15,988
1,872

$     —
(447)
(447)
—
(6,594)
(6,539)
—

$10, 762
2,523
92
2,381
34,794
54,055
3,769

Y E A R   E N D E D   D E C E M B E R   3 1 , 2 0 0 0

Microvision

Lumera

Elimination

Total

Revenues from external sources
Interest income
Interest expense
Depreciation
Segment loss
Segment assets
Purchases of capital assets

N O T E

| 18 |

S U B S E Q U E N T   E V E N T S

$ 8,060
3,504
164
1,093
23,696
53,024
2,216

$    61
1
400
154
2,905
3,148
3,213

$   —
(400)
(400)
—
—
—
—

$ 8,121
3,105
164
1,247
26,601
56,172
5,429

In March 2002, the Company raised $6,000 before issuance costs from the sale of 524,000 shares of Microvision, Inc. com-

mon stock at a price of $11.50 per share to six investors.

M V I S

F I N A N C I A L   C O N D I T I O N  A N D   R E S U LT S   O F   O P E R AT I O N S

40

M V I S

C O N D I T I O N  A N D   R E S U LT S   O F   O P E R AT I O N S

41

M A N A G E M E N T ’ S   D I S C U S S I O N  A N D  A N A LY S I S   O F  

M A N A G E M E N T ’ S   D I S C U S S I O N  A N D  A N A LY S I S   O F   F I N A N C I A L

O V E R V I E W The Company commenced operations in May 1993 to develop and commercialize technology for displaying images
and information onto the retina of the eye. In 1993, the Company acquired an exclusive license to the Virtual Retinal Display
technology from the University of Washington and entered into a research agreement with the University of Washington to fur-
ther develop the Virtual Retinal Display technology.The Company has continued to develop the Virtual Retinal Display technol-
ogy as part of its broader research and development efforts relating to the retinal scanning display technology.

Since the completion of its initial public offering in August 1996, the Company has established and equipped its own in-house
laboratory for the continuing development of the retinal scanning display technology and has transferred the research and devel-
opment work on the Virtual Retinal Display technology from the University of Washington to the Company.

The  Company  currently  has  several  demonstration  versions  of  the  retinal  scanning  display  including  monochromatic  and
color portable units, and full-color tabletop models. The Company expects to continue funding prototype and demonstration
versions of products incorporating the retinal scanning display technology at least through 2002. Future revenues, profits and
cash flow and the Company’s ability to achieve its strategic objectives as described herein will depend on a number of factors,
including acceptance of the retinal scanning display technology by various industries and OEMs, market acceptance of products
incorporating the retinal scanning display technology and the technical performance of such products.

The Company has incurred substantial losses since its inception and expects to incur a loss during the year ended December

31, 2002.

In 2000, the Company formed a subsidiary, Lumera Corporation (“Lumera”), to develop and commercialize a new class of
non-linear optical chromophores (“Optical Materials”) and devices that utilize the optical properties of these Optical Materials.
Non-linear organic electro-optical chromophore materials are materials that interact with and can be used to change the prop-
erties of light waves, including the speed and direction at which light waves travel. In 2001, Lumera acquired an exclusive license
to  the  optical  materials  technology  from  the  University  of Washington  and  entered  into  a  multi-year  Sponsored  Research
Agreement with the University of Washington to fund continued development work on the Optical Materials.

Lumera, which is a development stage enterprise, has incurred significant net losses since inception.To date Lumera has sat-
isfied its capital requirements principally from the sale of mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred stock and intercompa-
ny loans from Microvision.

Lumera has established and built in-house laboratories to develop and characterize new materials, create new device designs
and  perform  small-scale  production  of  new  devices  and  systems  based  on  the  Optical  Materials. As  of  December  31, 2001,
Microvision owed 76% of the common stock and 11% of the mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred stock of Lumera.

K E Y  A C C O U N T I N G   P O L I C I E S  A N D   E S T I M AT E S Microvision’s discussions and analysis of its financial condition and results of
operations  are  based  upon  the  Company’s  consolidated  financial  statements, which  have  been  prepared  in  accordance  with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.The preparation of these financial statements requires the Company
to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related dis-
closure of contingent liabilities. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to revenue
recognition, contract losses, bad debts, investments and contingencies and litigation.The Company bases its estimates on histor-
ical experience, terms of existing contracts, our evaluation of trends in the display and optical systems components industries,
information provided by our current and prospective customers and strategic partners, and information available from other out-
side sources, and on various other assumptions management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of
which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from
other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

The Company believes the following key accounting policies require its more significant judgments and estimates used in the

preparation of its consolidated financial statements.

The Company recognizes revenue as work progresses on long-term, cost plus fixed fee and fixed price contracts using the
percentage-of-completion method, which relies on estimates of total expected contract revenue and costs. The Company uses
this  revenue  recognition  methodology  because  it  can  make  reasonably  dependable  estimates  of  the  revenue  and  costs.
Recognized revenues are subject to revisions as the contract progresses to completion and actual revenue and cost become cer-
tain. Revisions in revenue estimates are reflected in the period in which the facts that give rise to the revision become known.
The Company maintains allowances for estimated losses resulting from the estimated cost to complete a contract that are
in excess of the remaining contract value.The entire estimated loss is recorded in the period in which the loss is first determined.
The Company’s product sales generally include acceptance clauses. Acceptance occurs upon the earlier of receipt of a writ-

ten customer acceptance or expiration of the acceptance period.

The Company maintains a general allowance for uncollectible receivables, including accounts receivable, costs and estimated
earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts and receivables from related parties.The Company reviews several fac-
tors in determining the allowance including the customer’s past payment history and financial condition. If the financial condition
of our customers or the related parties who have receivable balances with the Company were to deteriorate, resulting in an
impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances could be required.

The Company has not recorded an impairment of the minority interest it owns in a privately held company.The value of the
minority interest is difficult to determine in the absence of a public trading market.The Company has not recorded an impair-
ment of the minority interest it owns in a privately held company. Microvision records an impairment charge when it believes an
investment has experienced a decline in value that is other than temporary. Future adverse changes in market conditions or poor
operating results of underlying investments could result in losses or an inability to recover the carrying value of the investments,
thereby possibly requiring an impairment charge in the future.

The Company believes that the probability of an unfavorable outcome in its pending litigation is low and therefore has not
recorded an accrual for any potential loss. The Company’s current estimated range of liability related to pending litigation is
based on claims for which our management can estimate the amount and range of potential loss. The Company believes that
the probability of an unfavorable outcome in its pending litigation is low and therefore has not recorded an accrual for any
potential loss. As additional information becomes available, the Company will assess the potential liability related to its pend-
ing litigation and, if appropriate, revise its estimates. Such revisions in the Company’s estimates of the potential liability could
materially impact our results of operation and financial position.

The key accounting policies described above are not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies. In
many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by generally accepted accounting princi-
ples, with no need for management to apply its judgment or make estimates.There are also areas in which management’s judg-
ment in selecting any available alternative would not produce a materially different result to the Company’s consolidated financial
statements. Additional information about Microvision’s accounting policies, and other disclosures required by generally accepted
accounting principles, are set forth in the notes to the Company’s consolidated financial statements, which begin on page 26 of
this Annual Report.

R E S U LT S   O F   O P E R AT I O N S  

Y E A R   E N D E D   D E C E M B E R   3 1 , 2 0 0 1   C O M PA R E D  T O  Y E A R   E N D E D   D E C E M B E R   3 1 , 2 0 0 0

R E V E N U E Revenue increased by $2.7 million, or 33%, to $10.8 million in 2001 from $8.1 million in 2000.The increase resulted
from a higher level of development contract business in 2001 than that performed in 2000 on contracts entered into in both
2001 and 2000.

To date, substantially all of the Company’s revenue has been generated from development contracts. The Company’s cus-
tomers  have  included  both  the  United  States  government  and  commercial  enterprises. The  United  States  government
accounted for approximately 93% and 91% of revenue during 2001 and 2000, respectively. The Company expects revenue to fluc-
tuate from year to year.

During 2001, the Company entered into several development contracts with both commercial and government entities for

further development of the retinal scanning display technology to meet specific customer applications.

In the defense sector, the Company entered into a $2.9 million contract modification with the U.S. Army’s Aviation Applied
Technology Directorate to continue work on an advanced helmet-mounted display and imaging system to be used in the Virtual
Cockpit Optimization Program. In addition, the Company was awarded a $4.2 million contract modification with the U.S.Army’s
Aircrew Integrated Helmet Systems Program office to further advance the form and functional development of a helmet-mount-
ed display.

In October 2001, the Company entered into a $1.5 million subcontract with Concurrent Technologies Corporation in sup-
port of the Office of Naval Research’s Battlespace Information Display Technology program. The purpose of the program is to
develop improved micro-electrical-mechanical systems for use in displaying information on the battlefield.

In December 2001, the Company entered into a $3.3 million contract with the U.S. Army’s Medical Research Acquisition
Activities,Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center for the initial phase in the development of a mobile wireless
personal display system for medical applications.

In August 2001, Lumera entered into a $1.6 million contract with the U.S. government to design new optical materials appro-

priate for the fabrication of a wideband optical modulator demonstration system.

During 2001, the Company delivered a full-color demonstration display to the Cleveland Clinic. Cleveland Clinic will use the

display to develop and evaluate clinical applications of the retinal scanning display technology.

In  December  2001, the  Company  started  production  of  Nomad, a  monochrome  head-worn  display. The  Company  has
deferred revenue of $50,000 on Nomad units shipped in December 2001 pending customer acceptance. As of December 31,
2001 the Company had received orders for 31 Nomads.

The Company had a backlog of $6.8 million, including approximately $250,000 in Nomad orders, at December 31, 2001.The
backlog  is  composed  of  development  and  products  contracts, including  amendments, and  product  orders, entered  through
December 31, 2001. The Company plans to complete all of the backlog contracts during 2002.

C O S T   O F   R E V E N U E Cost of revenue includes both the direct and indirect costs of performing on development contracts and
delivering  products. Direct  costs  include  labor, materials  and  other  costs  incurred  directly  in  performing  of  specific  projects.
Indirect costs include labor and other costs associated with operating the Company’s research and product development depart-
ment and building the technical capabilities of the Company. Cost of revenue is determined both by the level of direct costs
incurred on development contracts and by the level of indirect costs incurred in managing and building the technical capabilities
and capacity of the Company. The cost of revenue can fluctuate substantially from period to period depending on the level of
both the direct costs incurred in the performance of projects and the level of indirect costs incurred.

Cost of revenue was $6.1 million in both 2001 and 2000. On a percentage of revenue basis, cost of revenue declined by 24%

to 57% in 2001 from 75% in 2000. The decline in cost of revenue as a percentage of sales is due to declines in:

The allocation of indirect cost to cost of revenue,
The reduction in losses on uncompleted contracts, and
The mix of development contracts and product cost.

M V I S

C O N D I T I O N  A N D   R E S U LT S   O F   O P E R AT I O N S

42

M V I S

C O N D I T I O N  A N D   R E S U LT S   O F   O P E R AT I O N S

43

M A N A G E M E N T ’ S   D I S C U S S I O N  A N D  A N A LY S I S   O F   F I N A N C I A L

M A N A G E M E N T ’ S   D I S C U S S I O N  A N D  A N A LY S I S   O F   F I N A N C I A L

The lower level of indirect expense in 2001 as compared to 2000 resulted from a higher level of investment the Company
made in developing its technologies through work performed on internal research and development projects, which resulted in
greater overhead absorption by these research and development projects.

The Company expects that cost of revenue on an absolute dollar basis will increase in the future. This increase will likely
result from additional development contract work that the Company expects to perform and planned shipments of commercial
products, and commensurate growth in the Company’s personnel and technical capacity required for performance on such con-
tracts.The Company expects the cost of contract revenue as a percentage of contract revenue to remain relatively flat over time.
The cost of revenue as a percentage of revenue can fluctuate significantly from period to period depending on the contract mix,
the cost of future planned products and the level of direct and indirect cost incurred.

R E S E A R C H  A N D   D E V E L O P M E N T   E X P E N S E Research and development expense consists of:

Compensation related costs of employees and contractors engaged in internal research and product 
development activities,
Research fees paid to the University of Washington under the Sponsored Research Agreement,
Laboratory operations, outsourced development and processing work,
Fees and expenses related to patent applications, prosecution and protection, and
Related operating expenses.

Included in research and development expenses are costs incurred in acquiring and maintaining licenses. The Company has

charged all research and development costs to cost of revenue or research and development expense.

Research and development expense increased by $12.4 million, or 63%, to $31.9 million from $19.5 million in 2000.The
increase reflects continued implementation of the Company’s operating plan, which calls for building technical staff and support-
ing activities, establishing and equipping in-house laboratories, and developing and maintaining its intellectual property portfolio.

In February 2001, the Company made the final payment on a fully paid exclusive license for the “HALO” technology from
the University of Washington.This technology involves the projection of data and images onto the inside of a dome that is placed
over the viewer’s head.The Company issued 37,000 shares of common stock valued at $1.0 million based on the closing stock
price on the date of settlement and paid $100,000 to the University of Washington for the final payment for the license. The
total value of the final payment of $1.1 million was recorded as research and development expense in 2001 as the technology
was deemed to have no alternative future use.

In March 2001, Lumera paid $200,000 to the University of Washington for an exclusive royalty-bearing license relating to the
Optical Materials technology. The payment was recorded as an expense as the technology was deemed to have no alternative
future use. In addition, during 2001, Lumera made three quarterly payments of $750,000 each to the University of Washington
under the Sponsored Research Agreement. Additional quarterly payments totaling $7.7 million are required over the remaining
term of the three-year research agreement. Lumera amortized $2.0 million to expense for the cash portion of the payments
under the Sponsored Research Agreement during 2001.The remaining $250,000 paid to the University of Washington is record-
ed as a current asset at December 31, 2001.

Research  and  development  expense  for  Lumera  during  2001, including  the  payments  under  the  Sponsored  Research

Agreement, was $6.4 million.

The Company believes that a substantial level of continuing research and development expense will be required to develop
commercial  products  using  the  retinal  scanning  display  technology  and  the  Optical  Materials  technology. Accordingly, the
Company  anticipates  that  its  research  and  development  expenditures  will  continue  to  be  significant. These  expenses  will  be
incurred as a result of:

Hiring additional technical and support personnel,
Expanding and equipping in-house laboratories,
Acquiring rights to additional technologies,
Subcontracting work to development partners, and
Incurring related operating expenses.

The Company expects that the rate of spending on research and product development will continue to grow in future quar-

ters as we:

Continue development of the Company’s retinal scanning display technology,
Develop and commercialize Lumera’s Optical Materials technology,
Accelerate development of microdisplays to meet emerging market opportunities,
Expand the Company’s investment in bar code scanner development, and
Pursue other potential business opportunities.

M A R K E T I N G , G E N E R A L  A N D  A D M I N I S T R AT I V E   E X P E N S E Marketing, general and administrative expenses include compen-
sation and support costs for sales, marketing, management and administrative staff, and for other general and administrative costs,
including legal and accounting, consultants and other operating expenses.

The Company’s marketing activities include corporate awareness campaigns, such as web site development and participation
at trade shows; corporate communications initiatives; and working with potential customers and joint venture partners to iden-
tify and evaluate product applications in which the Company’s technology could be integrated or otherwise used.

Marketing, general and administrative expenses increased by $3.9 million, or 37%, to $14.4 million from $10.5 million in 2000.
The increase includes increased compensation and support costs for employees and contractors. The Company expects mar-
keting, general and administrative expenses to increase substantially in future periods as the Company:

Adds to its sales and marketing staff,
Makes additional investments in sales and marketing activities, and
Increases the level of corporate and administrative activity.

Marketing, general and administrative expenses for Lumera during 2001 were $2.8 million.

N O N - C A S H   C O M P E N S AT I O N   E X P E N S E Non-cash compensation expense increased by approximately $900,000, or 59%, to
$2.5 million from $1.6 million in 2000. Non-cash compensation expense includes the amortization of the value of stock options
granted to individuals who are not employees or directors of the Company for services provided to the Company.

In January 2001, Lumera issued 802,414 shares of its Class A Common Stock to the University of Washington pursuant to
the Sponsored Research Agreement. The shares were valued at the fair market price of $3.75 per share, as determined by the
board of directors.The total value of the stock of $3.0 million was recorded as a prepaid research expense and is being amor-
tized over the three year term of the Sponsored Research Agreement.The total amortization expense relating to the Sponsored
Research Agreement during 2001 was $844,000.

In September 2001, Lumera issued options to purchase 33,300 shares of Lumera Class A Common Stock at an exercise price
of $10.00 per share to a consultant that provided professional services to Lumera.These options expire 10 years following the
date of grant, are fully vested and were exercisable at date of issuance.The options were valued at the date of grant at $137,000
and this amount was recorded as an expense in 2001.The fair value of the options was estimated using the Black-Scholes option
pricing model with a stock price of $5.34 per share, dividend yield of zero percent; expected volatility of 80%; risk-free interest
rate of 4.0% and expected life of ten years.

In August 2000, the Company entered into five-year consulting agreements with two independent consultants to provide
strategic  business  and  financial  consulting  services  to  the  Company. Under  the  terms  of  the  agreements, each  consultant
received a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $34.00 per share. The warrants vest
over three years and the unvested shares are subject to remeasurement at each balance sheet date during the vesting period.
The original value of the warrants was estimated at $5.5 million. Due to a decrease in the Company stock price, the value at
December 31, 2001 was estimated at $3.4 million. In 2001, total non-cash amortization for these agreements was $775,000
compared to $345,000 in 2000. The fair values of the warrants were determined at December 31, 2001, 2000, and the issue
date, using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: dividend yield of zero per-
cent; and expected volatility of 83% for all measurement dates; risk-free interest rates of 5.9%, 6.0% and 6.0%; and expected
lives of 9.2, 10 and 10 years.

The following table shows the major components of non-cash compensation expense for 2001 and 2000 respectively.

Lumera stock issued to the University of Washington
Company and Lumera stock options issued to employees
Company and Lumera stock options issued to consultants
Stock and options issued to Independent Directors

2001

2000

$  844,000
411,000
1,047,000
231,000
$2,533,000

$         —
469,000
591,000
532,000
$1,592,000 

I N T E R E S T   I N C O M E  A N D   E X P E N S E Interest income decreased by $600,000 or 19%, to $2.5 million from $3.1 million in 2000.
This decrease resulted primarily from lower average cash and investment securities balances in 2001 than the average cash and
investment securities balances in the prior year.

Interest expense was consistent with 2001 because the amount of borrowings did not change significantly.

I N C O M E   TA X E S No provision for income taxes has been recorded because the Company has experienced net losses from
inception through December 31, 2001. At December 31, 2001, the Company had net operating loss carry-forwards of approxi-
mately $94.2 million for federal income tax reporting purposes. In addition the Company has research and development tax cred-
its of $1.8 million.The net operating losses begin expiring in 2008 if not previously utilized. In certain circumstances, as specified
in the Internal Revenue Code, a 50% or more ownership change by certain combinations of the Company’s shareholders during
any three-year period would result in a limitation on the Company’s ability to utilize its net operating loss carry-forwards. The

M V I S

C O N D I T I O N  A N D   R E S U LT S   O F   O P E R AT I O N S

44

M V I S

C O N D I T I O N  A N D   R E S U LT S   O F   O P E R AT I O N S

45

M A N A G E M E N T ’ S   D I S C U S S I O N  A N D  A N A LY S I S   O F   F I N A N C I A L

M A N A G E M E N T ’ S   D I S C U S S I O N  A N D  A N A LY S I S   O F   F I N A N C I A L

Company  has  determined  that  such  a  change  of  ownership  occurred  during  1995  and  that  the  annual  utilization  of  loss 
carry-forwards generated through the period of that change will be limited to approximately $1.1 million. An additional change
of ownership occurred in 1996 and the limitation for losses generated in 1996 is approximately $1.6 million. Lumera has addi-
tional net operating loss carry forwards of $12.3 million which are available only to Lumera.

Y E A R   E N D E D   D E C E M B E R   3 1 , 2 0 0 0   C O M PA R E D  T O  Y E A R   E N D E D   D E C E M B E R   3 1 , 1 9 9 9

R E V E N U E Revenue increased by $1.2 million, or 18%, to $8.1 million in 2000 from $6.9 million in 1999.The increase resulted
from a higher level of development contract business in 2000 than that performed in 1999 on contracts entered into in both
2000 and 1999.

Through December 31, 2000, substantially all of the Company’s revenue has been generated from development contracts.
The Company’s customers have included both the United States government and commercial enterprises.The United States gov-
ernment accounted for approximately 91% and 82% of revenue during 2000 and 1999, respectively.

During 2000, the Company entered into several development contracts with both commercial and government entities for

further development of the retinal scanning display technology to meet specific customer applications.

In the defense sector area, the Company entered into a $5.0 million contract with the U.S. Army’s Aviation Applied
Technology Directorate to continue work on an advanced helmet-mounted display and imaging system to be used 
in the Virtual Cockpit Optimization Program. In addition, the Company was awarded a $2.8 million contract with the 
U.S. Army’s Aircrew Integrated Helmet Systems Program office to further advance the form and functional development 
of a helmet-mounted display.
During 2000, the Company entered into a $600,000 contract to provide a Nomad demonstrator unit and a full-color 
prototype display to the Cleveland Clinic.The Company has sold four additional Nomad demonstration units to customers
in the medical and industrial markets during 2000.

The Company ended the year with a $4.5 million backlog.The backlog is composed of development and products contracts,

including amendments entered through December 31, 2000.

C O S T   O F   R E V E N U E Cost of revenue includes both the direct and indirect costs of performing on development contracts and
delivering products. Direct costs include labor, materials and other costs incurred directly in performing specific projects. Indirect
costs include labor and other costs associated with operating the Company’s research and product development department
and building the technical capabilities of the Company. Cost of revenue is determined both by the level of direct costs incurred
on development contracts and by the level of indirect costs incurred in managing and building the technical capabilities and capac-
ity of the Company. The cost of revenue can fluctuate substantially from period to period depending on the level of both the
direct costs incurred in the performance of projects and the level of indirect costs incurred.

Cost of revenue increased by approximately $1.2 million, or 23%, to $6.1 million in 2000, from $4.9 million in 1999.The
increase resulted from an increase in the direct costs associated with the Company’s performance on development contracts in
2000 from that in 1999.

Cost of revenue in 2000 includes a provision for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts.The Company recognizes any
estimated losses on contracts in full as soon as identified.The losses are a result of the Company’s decision to invest in strate-
gic projects with our partners.The Company may decide to enter into a loss contract when management believes the project is
likely to result in additional contract or product revenue that will have a positive gross margin.

R E S E A R C H  A N D   D E V E L O P M E N T   E X P E N S E Research and development expense consists of:

Compensation related costs of employees and contractors engaged in internal research 
and product development activities,
Laboratory operations, outsourced development and processing work,
Fees and expenses related to patent applications, prosecution and protection, and
Related operating expenses.

Included  in  research  and  development  expenses  are  costs  incurred  in  acquiring  and  maintaining  technology  licenses. The

Company has charged all research and development costs to cost of revenue or research and development expense.

Research  and  development  expense  increased  by  $9.3  million, or  91%, to  $19.5  million  from  $10.2  million  in  1999. The
increase reflects continued implementation of the Company’s operating plan, which calls for building technical staff and support-
ing activities, establishing and equipping in-house laboratories, and developing and maintaining intellectual property.

In April 2000, the Company entered into a $10.0 million extension of an agreement with Cree, Inc. to continue develop-
ment of semiconductor light emitting diodes and laser diodes.The Company must pay $4.5 million during the first year of the
extension in four equal quarterly payments. As of December 31, 2000, the Company had made three payments under this agree-
ment. During the second year of the extension, the Company is required to pay the remaining $5.5 million in four equal quar-
terly payments.

M A R K E T I N G , G E N E R A L  A N D  A D M I N I S T R AT I V E   E X P E N S E Marketing, general and administrative expenses include compen-
sation and support costs for sales, marketing, management and administrative staff, and for other general and administrative costs,
including legal and accounting, consultants and other operating expenses.

Marketing, general and administrative expenses increased by $3.3 million, or 45%, to $10.5 million from $7.2 million in 1999.

The increase includes increased compensation and support costs for employees and contractors.

N O N - C A S H   C O M P E N S AT I O N   E X P E N S E Non-cash compensation expense increased by $1.3 million, or 503%, to $1.6 million
from $264,000 in 1999. Non-cash compensation expense includes the amortization of the value of stock options granted to indi-
viduals who are not employees or directors of the Company for services provided to the Company.

A significant component of the increase is due to a five-year consulting agreement between the Company and two inde-
pendent consultants, entered into in August 2000, to provide strategic business and financial consulting services. Under the terms
of the agreements, each consultant received a warrant to purchase 100,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of
$34.00 per share. The warrants vest over three years and the unvested shares are subject to remeasurement at each balance
sheet date during the vesting period.The original value of the warrants was estimated at $5.5 million. Due to a decrease in the
Company stock price, the value at December 31, 2000 was estimated at $3.7 million. In 2000, total non-cash amortization for
these agreements was $345,000.

The following table shows the major components of non-cash compensation expense:

Stock options issued to consultants
Stock options issued to employees
Stock and options issued to Board members

2000

1999

$ 591,000
469,000
532,000
$1,592,000

$ 66,000
34,000
164,000
$264,000

I N T E R E S T   I N C O M E   A N D   E X P E N S E Interest income increased by $1.9 million, or 167%, to $3.1 million from $1.2 million in
1999.This increase resulted primarily from higher average cash and investment securities balances in 2000 than the average cash
and investment securities balances in the prior year.

Interest expense was consistent with 1999 because the amount of borrowings did not change significantly.

I N C O M E  TA X E S No provision for income taxes has been recorded because the Company has experienced net losses from
inception through December 31, 2000. At December 31, 2000, the Company had net operating loss carry-forwards of approx-
imately $65.6 million for federal income tax reporting purposes. The net operating losses begin expiring in 2008 if not previ-
ously utilized.

L I Q U I D I T Y  A N D   C A P I TA L   R E S O U R C E S
The Company has funded its operations to date primarily through the sale of common stock and convertible preferred stock
and, to a lesser extent, revenues from development contracts and product sales. At December 31, 2001, the Company had $33.7
million in cash, cash equivalents and investment securities.

The Company had the following material changes in assets and liabilities during the year ended December 31, 2001:
“Other current assets” increased by $1.3 million to $2.3 million at December 31, 2001 from $976,000 at December 31, 2000.
“Other  assets” increased  by  $1.2  million  to  $1.3  million  at  December  31, 2001  from  $114,000  at  December  31, 2000. The
increase in both Other Current Assets and Other Assets was attributable to payments to the University of Washington for con-
tinued research under the Sponsored Research Agreement in excess of expense that had been recognized. The Company rec-
ognizes the expense on the Sponsored Research Agreement on a straight-line basis over the term of the agreement. The por-
tion of the payments that will be amortized to expense during the next twelve months will be classified as “other current assets,”
and the portion that will be amortized to expense more than twelve months from the balance sheet date is classified as “other
assets.” The payments were comprised of both cash and shares of Lumera common stock.

“Receivables from related parties” increased by $1.3 million to $2.3 million at December 31, 2001 from $1.0 million at
December 31, 2000.The increase was attributable to increased borrowings under the Executive Loan Program. In
September 2001, the compensation committee of the board of directors approved a $500,000 increase in the loan limit
for one executive officer under the plan.
“Accrued liabilities” increased by $1.9 million to $4.3 million at December 31, 2001 from $2.4 million at December 31,
2000.The reserve for bonuses increased $450,000 to $1.1 million at December 31, 2001 from $650,000 at December 31,
2000.The increase is attributable to shifting the payment of a larger portion of bonuses to after year end.The remaining
increase is due to the timing of normal payroll related payments and other liabilities that the Company recognizes when
they are probable and the amount of the obligation can be determined.

M V I S

C O N D I T I O N  A N D   R E S U LT S   O F   O P E R AT I O N S

46

M V I S

C O N D I T I O N  A N D   R E S U LT S   O F   O P E R AT I O N S

47

M A N A G E M E N T ’ S   D I S C U S S I O N  A N D  A N A LY S I S   O F   F I N A N C I A L

M A N A G E M E N T ’ S   D I S C U S S I O N  A N D  A N A LY S I S   O F   F I N A N C I A L

Cash used in operating activities totaled $35.0 million in 2001 compared to $22.1 million in 2000. Cash used in operating

activities for each period resulted primarily from the net loss for the period.

Cash provided by investing activities totaled $10.8 million in 2001 compared to cash used in investing activities of $10.3 mil-
lion in 2000.The increase in cash provided by investing activities resulted primarily from the sales of investment securities offset
by  increases  in  purchases  of  property  and  equipment. The  increase  in  sales  of  investment  securities  is  consistent  with  the
Company’s plan to use the cash from the sales of investment securities to fund the Company’s operations.

The Company used cash for capital expenditures of $3.8 million in 2001 compared to approximately $5.4 million in 2000.
Historically, capital expenditures have been used to make leasehold improvements to leased office space and to purchase com-
puter hardware and software, laboratory equipment and furniture and fixtures to support the Company’s growth. Capital expen-
ditures are expected to increase as the Company expands its operations.The Company currently has no material commitments
for capital expenditures.

Cash provided by financing activities totaled approximately $32.5 million in 2001 compared to $36.9 million in 2000. The
decrease in cash provided by financing activities resulted primarily from decreases in the net proceeds from the issuance of com-
mon stock offset by an increase in preferred stock in 2001.

In March 2001, Lumera raised $21.4 million, before issuance costs, from the issuance of 2,136,000 shares of Lumera
mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred stock.
In October 2001, the Company raised $11.0 million, before issuance costs, from the issuance of 971,496 shares of
Microvision common stock and warrants to purchase 145,723 shares of common stock.The warrants have an exercise
price of $14.62 per share and a four-year term.

The Company’s investment policy restricts investments to ensure principal preservation and liquidity.The Company invests
cash that it expects to use within approximately sixty days in U.S. treasury-backed instruments. The Company invests cash in
excess of sixty days of its requirements in high quality investment securities.The investment securities portfolio is limited to U.S.
government and U.S. government agency debt securities and other high-grade securities generally with maturities of three years
or less.

Microvision and Lumera maintain separate cash and investment accounts. Each Company’s cash and investments are gener-

ally used to fund their business activities.

The Company’s future expenditures and capital requirements will depend on numerous factors, including the progress of its
research and development program, the progress in commercialization activities and arrangements, the cost of filing, prosecut-
ing, defending and enforcing any patent claims and other intellectual property rights, competing technological and market devel-
opments and the ability of the Company to establish cooperative development, joint venture and licensing arrangements. In order
to maintain its exclusive rights under the Company’s license agreement with the University of Washington, the Company is obli-
gated to make royalty payments to the University of Washington with respect to the Virtual Retinal Display technology. If the
Company is successful in establishing OEM co-development and joint venture arrangements, the Company expects its partners
to fund certain non-recurring engineering costs for technology development and/or for product development. Nevertheless, the
Company expects its cash requirements to increase significantly each year as it expands its activities and operations with the
objective of commercializing the retinal scanning display and Optical Materials technologies.

The following table lists the Company’s material known future cash commitments (in thousands).

Y E A R   E N D I N G

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

C O M M I T M E N T S
Minimum payments under capital leases
Minimum payments under operating leases
Minimum payments under research, royalty

$  189
1,997

$    51
2,122

$    17
1,726

$    —
1,643

and licensing agreements

3,248

3,480

2,475

500

$  —
406

—

B U D G E T E D   E X P E N D I T U R E S
Budgeted capital equipment purchase
to support planned production

$1,500

$    —

$    —

$    —

$  —

The Company believes that its cash, cash equivalent and investment securities balances totaling $33.7 million, in addition to
the $6.0 million raised in March, 2002 will satisfy its budgeted cash requirements for the next 12 months based on the Company’s
current operating plan. Should expenses exceed the amounts budgeted, the Company may require additional capital earlier to
further the development of its technology, for expenses associated with product development, and to respond to competitive
pressures or to meet unanticipated development difficulties. In addition, the Company’s operating plan calls for the addition of
sales, marketing, technical and other staff and the purchase of additional laboratory and production equipment. The operating
plan also provides for the development of strategic relationships with systems and equipment manufacturers that may require
additional investments by the Company.There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to the Company or
that, if available, it will be available on terms acceptable to the Company on a timely basis. If adequate funds are not available to
satisfy either short-term or long-term capital requirements, the Company may be required to limit its operations substantially.
The Company’s capital requirements will depend on many factors, including, but not limited to, the rate at which the Company
can, directly or through arrangements with OEMs, introduce products incorporating the retinal scanning display technology and
the market acceptance and competitive position of such products.

N E W  A C C O U N T I N G   P R O N O U N C E M E N T S    
The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 133 “Accounting for Derivatives and Hedging
Activities” in the quarter ended March 31, 2001.The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 141, “Business Combinations”. This state-
ment provides accounting and reporting standards for business combinations initiated subsequent to June 30, 2002. All business
combinations in the scope of this statement are to be accounted for under one method, the purchase method.

In July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 142,“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. This statement provides accounting and
reporting standards for intangible assets acquired individually, with a group of other assets, or as part of a business combination.
This statement addresses the treatment of goodwill and other intangible assets after they have been initially recognized in the
financial statements. Under this statement, goodwill and other intangibles with indefinite useful lives, on a prospective basis, will no
longer be amortized, however will be tested for impairment at least annually, based on a fair value comparison. Intangibles that
have finite useful lives will continue to be amortized over their respective useful lives.This statement also requires expanded dis-
closure for goodwill and other intangible assets.The Company will be required to adopt this statement effective January 1, 2002.
As the Company has no recorded goodwill or intangible assets, there will be no initial effect from adoption of this standard.

In July 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 143,“Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations”.This statement provides account-
ing  and  reporting  standards  for  costs  associated  with  the  retirement  of  long-lived  assets. This  statement  requires  entities  to
record the fair value of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period in which it is incurred. When the liability is ini-
tially recorded, the entity capitalizes a cost by increasing the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Over time, the lia-
bility is accreted to its present value each period, and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset.
Upon settlement of the liability, an entity either settles the obligation for its recorded amount or incurs a gain or loss upon set-
tlement. Adoption of this statement is required no later than January 1, 2003.The Company is currently assessing the impact of
this statement on its results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

In October 2001, the FASB issued SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”. This
statement replaces SFAS No. 121,“Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed
Of”. FAS 144 retains the fundamental provisions of SFAS No. 121 for recognition and measurement of the impairment of long-
lived assets to be held and used and for measurement of long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale.This statement applies to all
long-lived  assets, including  discounted  operations, and  replaces  the  provisions  of APB  Opinion  No. 30, “Reporting  Results  of
Operations-Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business,” for the disposal of segments of a business.This state-
ment requires that those long-lived assets be measured at the lower of carrying amount of fair value less cost to sell, whether
reported in continuing operations or in discontinued operations.The Company will be required to adopt this statement no later
than January 1, 2002.The implementation of SFAS 144 will not have a material impact of this statement on the Company’s results
of operations, financial position or cash flows.

S U B S E Q U E N T   E V E N T S    
In March 2002, the Company raised $6.0 million, before issuance costs, from the sale of 524,000 shares of Microvision, Inc. com-
mon stock at a price of $11.50 per share to six investors.

M V I S

| C O R P O R AT E   I N F O R M AT I O N |

48

| O F F I C E R S  A N D   D I R E C T O R S |

F O R M   1 0 - K      
A copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-k as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission may be obtained
upon request without charge from the Company’s headquarters, attention: Investor Relations

M A R K E T   F O R  T H E   R E G I S T R A N T ’ S   C O M M O N   S T O C K  A N D   R E L AT E D   S H A R E H O L D E R   M AT T E R S    
The Company’s Common Stock trades on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol “MVIS.” As of February 28, 2002, there
were 284 holders of record of 13,004,000 shares of Common Stock. The Company has never declared or paid cash dividends
on the Common Stock.The Company currently anticipates that it will retain all future earnings to fund the operation of its busi-
ness and does not anticipate paying dividends on the Common Stock in the foreseeable future.

The Company’s Common Stock began trading publicly on August 27, 1996. The quarterly high and low sales prices of the
Company’s Common Stock for each full quarterly period in the last two fiscal years and the year to date as reported by the
Nasdaq National Market are as follows:

Q U A R T E R   E N D E D

March 31, 2000
June 30, 2000
September 30, 2000
December 31, 2000

March 31, 2001
June 30, 2001
September 30, 2001
December 31, 2001

January 1, 2002 to February 28, 2002

On February 28, 2002, the last sale price for the Common Stock was $10.55.

Common Stock

High

Low

68.50
56.50
55.13
39.00

29.00
27.50
22.00
16.32

15.45

25.38
21.75
29.19
13.63

13.00
12.88
9.00
10.92

9.60

B O A R D   O F   D I R E C T O R S

E X E C U T I V E   O F F I C E R S

I N D E P E N D E N T  A C C O U N TA N T S
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

T R A N S F E R  A G E N T
American Stock Transfer 
and Trust Company
59 Maiden Lane
New York, NY 10038
Shareholder Services
800 937-5449

S T O C K   L I S T I N G
Microvision, Inc. common stock 
is traded on The Nasdaq Stock
Market under the symbol MVIS.

I N V E S T O R   I N Q U I R I E S
Microvision, Inc.
Attn: Investor Relations
19910 North Creek Parkway
Bothell,WA 98011
425 415-6847
ir@microvision.com

y
h
p
a
r
g
o
t
o
h
P

a
t
r
a
B

k
c
i
r
t
a
P

:
y
h
p
a
r
g
o
t
o
h
P

s
n
o
i
t
u
o
S

l

n
o
i
t
a
c
i
n
u
m
m
o
C
a
c
i
h
p
a
r
G

:

n
g
i
s
e
D

Richard F. Rutkowski 
President & Chief Executive Officer
Microvision, Inc.

Stephen R.Willey
Executive Vice President 
Microvision, Inc.

Richard A. Raisig 
Chief Financial Officer &
Vice President, Operations 
Microvision, Inc.

Jacqueline Brandwynne
Founder & Chief Executive Officer 
Brandwynne Corporation

Jacob Brouwer
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer 
Brouwer Claims Canada & Co. Ltd.

Richard A. Cowell
Principal
Booz-Allen & Hamilton Inc.

Walter J. Lack
Attorney at Law
Engstrom, Lipscomb & Lack

William Owens
Vice Chairman & 
Co-Chief Executive Officer 
Teledesic LLC

Robert A. Ratliffe
Vice President & Principal
Eagle River, Inc.

Dennis J. Reimer
Retired, Chief of Staff, U.S. Army,
and Director of the National 
Memorial Institute for the Prevention 
of Terrorism in Oklahoma City

Richard F. Rutkowski 
President & Chief Executive Officer 

Stephen R.Willey
Executive Vice President 

Richard A. Raisig
Chief Financial Officer &
Vice President, Operations

William L. Sydnes 
Chief Operating Officer  

Vilakkudi G.Veeraraghaven 
Senior Vice President
Research & Product Development

Clarence T. Tegreene 
Chief Technology Officer

Richard A. James 
Director 
Manufacturing Operations

Andrew U. Lee
Vice President
Sales

Todd R. McIntyre 
Vice President 
Business Development

Thomas E. Sanko 
Vice President 
Marketing

Jeff T. Wilson 
Principal Accounting Officer

A DV I S O RY   B O A R D

Dr. Aris Silzars 
President
Society for Information Display 

Dr. John Marshall 
Frost Professor of Ophthalmology
St. Thomas’ Hospital 

S P E C I A L  A DV I S O R  T O  
B O A R D   O F   D I R E C T O R S

Dr. Andrew Viterbi
Co-founder, QUALCOMM
President, The Viterbi Group 

© 2002 Microvision, Inc., Microvision and the Microvision logo are registered trademarks of Microvision, Inc.VRD,Virtual Retinal Display, Nomad and
Flic are trademarks of Microvision, Inc. Other product and company names and/or logos herein may be the trademarks of their respective owners.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Microvision, Inc. 19910 North Creek Parkway, P.O. Box 3008, Bothell, WA 98011   tel: 425 415-6847   fax: 425 415-6600   http: www.microvision.com