MicroVision
Annual Report 2018

Plain-text annual report

2018 Annual Report and Proxy Statement for 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders Certain statements contained in this annual report, including, but not limited to, those relating to projections of revenues, income or loss, capital expenditures, plans for product development and cooperative arrangements, technology development by third parties, future operations, financing needs or plans of MicroVision, Inc. and those using words such as “anticipate,” “could,” “would,” “believe,” “estimate,” “transforming,” “expect,” “appear,” “goal,” “may,” “plan,” “project,” “will,” “convinced,” “opportunities,” and other similar expressions are forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in forward-looking statements include the following: our ability to raise additional capital when needed; market acceptance of our technologies and products, and for products incorporating our technologies; the failure of our commercial partners to perform as expected under our agreements; our ability to identify parties interested in paying any amounts or amounts we deem desirable for the purchase or license of intellectual property assets; our or our customers’ failure to perform under open purchase orders; our financial and technical resources relative to those of our competitors; our ability to keep up with rapid technological change; government regulation of our technologies; our ability to enforce our intellectual property rights and protect our proprietary technologies; the ability to obtain additional contract awards and to develop partnership opportunities; the timing of commercial product launches and delays in product development; the ability to achieve key technical milestones in key products; dependence on third parties to develop, manufacture, sell and market our products; potential product liability claims; and other risk factors identified from time to time in our SEC reports, including our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC. Except as expressly required by federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, changes in circumstances or any other reason. Dear Fellow MicroVision Stockholder, I believe that we made tremendous progress in 2018, and we are really excited by the sales opportunities we have for the current year. By advancing our culture, core technology, products and ability to execute, we have positioned the company to deliver our technology and solutions to multiple OEMs this year. Fifteen months ago, we set out with the goal of transforming MicroVision. We worked to change our corporate culture and sharpen our product roadmap. As a result, we believe we are demonstrating to our customers that they can count on our commitments and performance. Feedback from major Tier 1 technology companies has been encouraging and they appear to have welcomed the change. We invested in our core technology. We completed the development of new ASICs that advanced our products for our OEM, license partner and our modules. We have also developed our next generation MEMS that uses two mirrors to achieve industry leading resolution for a laser beam scanned display. Finally, we have advanced our system level performance by incorporating machine intelligence with edge computing in our modules. We made significant progress on our product roadmaps. We are wrapping up the final stages of our April 2017 development agreement with the Tier 1 technology company and expect to have orders for additional products and the forecast for the volume ramp shortly. In May 2018 we entered into a licensing agreement for our display only products with a global technology leader and received a $10 million up front license fee. We understand that there is significant interest from another Tier 1 technology company that could lead to a design award for the display only product and related purchase orders to MicroVision. Our interactive display product was very positively received at CES. This complete solution of hardware, software, and machine learning at the edge delivers a unique interactive experience with low latency that results in a high-quality user experience. Our interactive display product has received significant interest from multiple North America Tier 1 OEMs, and we expect orders this year for this product. We advanced our consumer LiDAR sensors from a proof-of-concept stage, and we started shipping the “Explorer Edition” of our 3D LiDAR engine in March that customers can use to develop their products. We believe the advanced capabilities of our sensor in the consumer LiDAR space opens up a range of possibilities for our customers. The results of all of these accomplishments in 2018 sets the table for revenue opportunities for us across multiple OEMS this year. I am excited about the many opportunities in front of us and want to thank you – our fellow MicroVision stockholders, customers, suppliers and employees – for your support and as we continue on our path to transform MicroVision into a profitable solutions company. Perry M. Mulligan Chief Executive Officer P r o x y Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and Proxy Statement y x o r P P r o x y MICROVISION, INC. NOTICE OF 2019 ANNUAL MEETING May 22, 2019 Dear MicroVision Shareholder: The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of MicroVision, Inc. (the “Company”) will be held at Courtyard Marriott Bellevue/ Redmond, 14615 NE 29th Place, Bellevue, WA 98007 on May 22, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. for the following purposes: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. To elect the seven director nominees named in the accompanying proxy statement to serve until the next annual meeting; To approve an amendment to the 2013 MicroVision, Inc. Incentive Plan; To ratify the selection of Moss Adams LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year; To hold a non-binding advisory vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers; and To conduct any other business that may properly come before the meeting and any adjournment or postponement of the meeting. Details of the business to be conducted at the meeting are more fully described in the accompanying Proxy Statement. Please read it carefully before casting your vote. If you were a shareholder of record on March 29, 2019 (the “Record Date”), you will be entitled to vote on the above matters. A list of shareholders as of the Record Date will be available for shareholder inspection at the headquarters of the Company, 6244 185th Avenue NE, Suite 100, Redmond, Washington 98052, during ordinary business hours, from May 10, 2019 to the date of the Annual Meeting. The list also will be available for inspection at the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, your vote is very important. Important! After reading the Proxy Statement, you are encouraged to vote by (1) toll-free telephone call, (2) the Internet or (3) completing, signing and dating the printable proxy card and returning it as soon as possible. If you are voting by telephone or the Internet, please follow the instructions on the proxy card. You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is voted by following the instructions provided below. Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be Held on May 22, 2019. The proxy materials and the annual report to shareholders for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 are available at http://www.microvision.com/investors/proxy.html. If you need assistance voting your shares, please call Investor Relations at (425) 882-6629. The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election of the seven nominees for director named in this proxy statement, a vote FOR approval of the proposed amendment to the 2013 MicroVision, Inc. Incentive Plan, a vote FOR ratification of the selection of Moss Adams LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and a vote FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as such information is disclosed in this Proxy Statement under the heading Executive Compensation (commonly referred to as “say-on-pay”). At the Annual Meeting, you will have an opportunity to ask questions about the Company and its operations. You may attend the Annual Meeting and vote your shares in person, even if you previously voted by telephone or the Internet or returned your proxy card. Your proxy (including a proxy granted by telephone or the Internet) may be revoked by sending in another signed proxy card with a later date, sending a letter revoking your proxy to the Company’s Secretary in Redmond, Washington, voting again by telephone or Internet, or attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. We look forward to seeing you. Thank you for your ongoing support of and interest in MicroVision, Inc. Sincerely, David J. Westgor Secretary April 9, 2019 Redmond, Washington y x o r P MICROVISION, INC. 6244 185th Avenue NE, Suite 100 Redmond, Washington 98052 PROXY STATEMENT FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS May 22, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . DISCUSSION OF PROPOSALS RECOMMENDED BY THE BOARD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proposal One—Election Of Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Board Meetings and Committees . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Shareholder Communication with the Board of Directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Code of Ethics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proposal Two—Amendment to the 2013 MicroVision Incentive Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Proposal Three—Ratification of the Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . Proposal Four—Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OTHER BUSINESS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Executive Compensation Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Summary Compensation Table for 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Outstanding Equity Awards at Year End 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Severance and Employment Agreements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Director Compensation for 2018 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . INFORMATION ABOUT MICROVISION COMMON STOCK OWNERSHIP . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . INFORMATION ABOUT SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ADDITIONAL INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Annual Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Incorporation by Reference . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Householding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Voting by Telephone or the Internet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 4 4 6 10 10 11 12 16 17 17 18 18 20 21 21 22 24 26 27 27 28 29 30 30 30 30 30 INFORMATION ABOUT THE ANNUAL MEETING AND VOTING Q: Why did you send me this Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials? A: We sent you the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials because the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board of Directors” or the “Board”) is soliciting your proxy to vote at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the “Annual Meeting”). The Annual Meeting will be held at the Courtyard Marriott Bellevue/Redmond, 14615 NE 29th Place, Bellevue, WA 98007 on May 22, 2019, at 9:00 a.m. This Proxy Statement summarizes the information regarding the matters to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting. You do not need to attend the Annual Meeting, however, to vote your shares. You may simply vote your shares by telephone or over the Internet in accordance with the instructions contained on the proxy card. You may also print, complete, sign, and return the proxy card to the address in the instructions. On March 29, 2019 (the “Record Date”) there were 102,104,593 shares of common stock of the Company outstanding. If you owned shares of our common stock at the close of business on the Record Date, you are entitled to one vote for each share of common stock you owned as of that date. We made this Proxy Statement available on or about April 9, 2019 to all shareholders entitled to vote their shares at the Annual Meeting. P r o x y Q: How many votes do I have? A: You have one vote for each share of common stock that you owned on the Record Date. The proxy card will indicate the number of shares. Q: How do I vote by proxy? A: If you properly cast your vote by either voting your proxy by telephone or via the Internet or executing and returning the proxy card, and your vote is not subsequently revoked by you, your vote will be voted in accordance with your instructions. If you sign the proxy card but do not make specific choices, your proxy will vote your shares as recommended by the Board as follows: • • • • “FOR” the election of each of the nominees for director named in this proxy statement; “FOR” approval of the proposed amendment to the 2013 MicroVision, Inc. Incentive Plan; “FOR” ratification of the selection of Moss Adams LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm; and “FOR” the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers, as such information is disclosed in this Proxy Statement under the heading Executive Compensation (commonly referred to as “say-on-pay”). If any other matter is presented, your proxy will vote in accordance with his or her best judgment. At the time we printed this Proxy Statement, we knew of no matters that needed to be acted on at the Annual Meeting other than those discussed in this Proxy Statement. Q: May my broker vote for me? A: Under the rules of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, if your broker holds your shares in its “street” name, the broker may vote your shares on routine matters even if it does not receive instructions from you. At the Annual Meeting your broker may, without instructions from you, vote on Proposal 3, but not on any of the other proposals. Q: What are abstentions and broker non-votes? A: An abstention represents the action by a shareholder to refrain from voting “for” or “against” a proposal. “Broker non-votes” represent votes that could have been cast on a particular matter by a broker, as a -1- y x o r P shareholder of record, but that were not cast because the broker (i) lacked discretionary voting authority on the matter and did not receive voting instructions from the beneficial owner of the shares or (ii) had discretionary voting authority but nevertheless refrained from voting on the matter. Q: May I revoke my proxy? A: Yes. You may change your mind after you send in your proxy card or vote your shares by telephone or via the Internet by following these procedures. To revoke your proxy: • Vote again by telephone or Internet; • • Send in another signed proxy card with a later date; Send a letter revoking your proxy to MicroVision’s Secretary at the Company’s offices in Redmond, Washington; or • Attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person. Q: How do I vote in person? A: If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person, we will give you a ballot when you arrive. If your shares are held in a brokerage account or by another nominee, the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials is being forwarded to you. Follow the instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials in order to vote your shares by proxy or in person. Alternatively, you may contact the person in whose name your shares are registered or brokerage if shares are held in street name and obtain a proxy from that person or brokerage and bring it to the Annual Meeting. Q: What is the quorum requirement for the meeting? A: The quorum requirement for holding the meeting and transacting business is one-third of the outstanding shares entitled to be voted. The shares may be present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting. Both abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum. Q: What vote is required to approve the election of directors (Proposal 1)? A: The seven nominees for director who receive the most votes at the 2019 Annual Meeting will be elected. So, if you do not vote for a nominee, or you “withhold authority to vote” for a nominee, your vote will not count either “for” or “against” the nominee. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of voting for directors. Q: What vote is required to approve the proposed amendment to the 2013 MicroVision, Inc. Incentive Plan (Proposal 2)? A: The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes properly cast on the proposal at the 2019 Annual Meeting is required to approve the amendment to the 2013 MicroVision, Inc. Incentive Plan. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not be counted “for” or “against” the proposal and will have no effect on the outcome of the vote. Q: What vote is required to ratify the selection of Moss Adams LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 3)? A: The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes properly cast on the proposal at the 2019 Annual Meeting is required to ratify the appointment of Moss Adams LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote. -2- Q: What vote is required to approve the vote on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers (Proposal 4)? A: For Proposal 4, you may vote “FOR”, “AGAINST”, or “ABSTAIN”. Because Proposal 4 is an advisory vote, there is technically no minimum vote requirement for that Proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of the vote. Q: Is voting confidential? A: We keep all the proxies and ballots private as a matter of practice. Q: Who pays the costs of soliciting these proxies? A: The Company will pay all the costs of soliciting these proxies. In addition to the solicitation of proxies by mail, our officers, employees or proxy solicitor also may solicit proxies by telephone, fax or other electronic means of communication, or in person. The Company will also reimburse banks, brokers, nominees, fiduciaries and solicitors, for the expenses they incur in forwarding the proxy materials to you. P r o x y Q: Who should I call if I have any questions? A: If you have any questions about the Annual Meeting, voting or your ownership of MicroVision common stock, please call us at (425) 882-6629 or send an e-mail to ir@microvision.com. -3- y x o r P DISCUSSION OF PROPOSALS RECOMMENDED BY THE BOARD Proposal One—Election of Directors The Board oversees the Company’s business affairs and monitors the performance of management. In accordance with corporate governance principles, the Board does not directly involve itself in day-to-day operations of the Company. The directors keep themselves informed through discussions with the Chief Executive Officer, other key executives, and the Company’s principal advisers by reading the reports and other materials that the Company sends them regularly and by participating in Board and committee meetings. The Company’s directors hold office until their successors have been elected and duly qualified unless the director resigns or by reason of death or other cause is unable to serve. Until any vacancy is filled, the Board will consist of the members who are elected at the Annual Meeting. Proxies cannot be voted for a greater number of persons than the number of nominees named. If any nominee is unable to stand for election, the shares represented by all valid proxies will be voted for the election of such substitute nominee as the Board may recommend. All of the nominees are currently directors of the Company. The Company is not aware that any nominee is or will be unable to stand for election. Proxies received from shareholders, unless directed otherwise, will be voted FOR the election of the nominees listed below. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” ALL OF THE NOMINEES NAMED BELOW AS DIRECTORS OF THE COMPANY. We seek individuals to serve as directors with established strong professional reputations, sophistication and experience in strategic planning, leadership, business management, innovation and in substantive areas that affect our business such as: technology development; sourcing, manufacturing and operations; financing; finance and accounting; business operations; government contracts; intellectual property strategy and licensing; legal and regulatory; and sales and marketing. We believe that each of our current directors possesses the professional and personal qualifications necessary for Board service and have highlighted particularly noteworthy attributes for each director in the individual biographies below. Set forth below are the name, position held and age of each director and of the nominees for director of the Company. The principal occupation and recent employment history of each nominee is described below, and the number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by each director and nominee as of March 29, 2019 is set forth on page 26 of this Proxy Statement. Name Age Position Simon Biddiscombe* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Robert P. Carlile (1) (2)* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yalon Farhi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Perry M. Mulligan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bernee D.L. Strom (1) (3)* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Brian Turner (2) (3)* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thomas M. Walker (2)* . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Slade Gorton (1) (3)*R . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 Director 63 Director 57 Director 61 Director and Chief Executive Officer 71 Director 59 Chairman of the Board and Lead Independent Director 54 Director 91 Director Independent Director * (1) Member of the Compensation Committee (2) Member of the Audit Committee (3) Member of the Nominating Committee R Mr. Gorton is not standing for election and will retire from the Board when his term expires at the Annual Meeting. -4- P r o x y Perry M. Mulligan has served as a director of the Company since January 2010 and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since November 2017. Mr. Mulligan has over 30 years of experience in operations and supply chain management. Mr. Mulligan was formerly Senior Vice President of Operations for Emulex Corporation where he oversaw Emulex operations, including supplier management, test engineering, logistics, IT and facilities from July 2013 to June 2015. Mr. Mulligan served as Senior Vice President, Operations for QLogic from October 2007 to June 2013, where he was responsible for all aspects of the manufacturing and delivery of products to the customer in addition to overall supply chain design and manufacturing strategy. Prior to QLogic, Mr. Mulligan was at Solectron from May 2004 to September 2007, where he held the position of Senior Vice President Supply Chain Management and Chief Procurement Officer and was responsible for establishing the overall materials and supply chain strategy. Mr. Mulligan brings extensive experience and knowledge in developing and setting up worldwide manufacturing and sourcing operations and overall supply chain strategy. Mr. Mulligan has an MBA from the University of Western Ontario. Simon Biddiscombe joined the Company’s board in December 2018. Mr. Biddiscombe is Chief Executive Officer and a board member at MobileIron, the security backbone for the digital enterprise protecting corporate data across apps, networks, and clouds. Since October 2017 he has led MobileIron’s overall business strategy and is responsible for MobileIron’s day-to-day-operations. Simon has over 20 years of management and financial experience. He began his career at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP where he spent nine years, including the firm’s Silicon Valley technology accounting and audit practice. He previously has served in several executive leadership roles including Chief Financial Officer and Chief Executive Officer at QLogic, Chief Financial Officer at Mindspeed Technologies, and Chief Financial Officer at Wyle Electronics. Mr. Biddiscombe holds a BA in business studies from the University of Glamorgan and is a Fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales. Mr. Biddiscombe brings expertise in finance, accounting, operations, business strategy and leadership. Robert P. Carlile, a retired partner at KPMG LLP, joined the Company’s board in February 2017. In his 39-year career in public accounting at KPMG and Arthur Andersen, Mr. Carlile served as the lead audit partner on numerous public company engagements operating across different industries including technology, retail, transportation, bio-science, and manufacturing. He worked directly with boards of directors and audit committees of these companies on audits of financial statements and internal controls, registration statements and assistance with mergers, acquisitions and dispositions. In addition to his experience as a lead audit partner Mr. Carlile held a variety of operating leadership positions at KPMG and Arthur Andersen in the Pacific Northwest. In these roles he was responsible for establishing market strategy, fostering community relationships and accomplishing operating results. Mr. Carlile brings expertise to the board in the areas of auditing, accounting and financial reporting, internal controls and corporate governance. Yalon Farhi joined the Company’s board in September 2016. Since 1998, Mr. Farhi, a Colonel in the Israeli Defense Forces (reserves), has served as a motivational lecturer and educator at Bnei-David Institutions, a pre-army and post-army educational program in Israel. From 1998 to January 2016, Mr. Farhi worked as an administrative manager for El-Ami, a non-governmental organization in Israel. Mr. Farhi also serves on the board of directors of DarioHealth Corp., a provider of digital health services and dynaCERT, Inc. a Canadian company that provides carbon reduction technology for internal combustion engines. In addition, for the past thirty years, Mr. Farhi has been the owner of a private gardening and land development services company based in Israel. Mr. Farhi received a degree in Education Studies and holds a Teaching Certificate from the Moreshet Yaacov College in Jerusalem. Mr. Farhi brings expertise to the board in international business. Bernee D.L. Strom has served as a director of the Company since October 2017. Ms. Strom has over 25 years of experience in executive management, marked by advisory roles and board memberships at Polaroid Corporation, Hughes Electronics/DirecTV, Benchmark Electronics and other public and privately held companies. Since April 2015, Ms. Strom has served as a Senior Advisor to Seattle-based investment bank Cascadia Capital and SkyLIFE Technologies. From 2008 to 2014 Ms. Strom was Chairman and CEO of WebTuner Corp., continuing as Chairman until 2015. Ms. Strom has also served as Chairman and CEO of Strom -5- y x o r P Group, an investment, management consulting, and business advisory firm focused on high technology companies. Prior to that, Ms. Strom founded or ran Gemstar/TV Guide International (now part of TIVO), Priceline.com, and USA Digital Radio (now HD Radio). Further, she was a founding partner of Revitalization Partners, a Seattle-based business advisory firm. Ms. Strom was named one of the leading business women of the State of Washington with its Lead Where You Land award and is the recipient of many other awards and recognition for her mentorship, entrepreneurship and leadership in both commercial and civic organizations. Ms. Strom brings business management and leadership expertise and knowledge to the Board. Brian Turner has served as a director of the Company since July 2006 and currently serves as Chairman of the Board and Lead Independent Director. Mr. Turner was the Chief Financial Officer of Coinstar Inc. from 2003 until June 2009. Prior to Coinstar, from 2001 to 2003, he served as Senior Vice President of Operations, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Real Networks, Inc., a digital media and technology company. Prior to Real Networks, from 1999 to 2001, Mr. Turner was employed by BSquare Corp., a software company, where he initially served as Senior Vice President of Operations, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary, before being promoted to President and Chief Operating Officer. From 1995 to 1999, Mr. Turner was Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Administration of Radisys Corp., an embedded software company. Mr. Turner’s experience also includes 13 years at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP where he held several positions including Director, Corporate Finance. Mr. Turner sits on various private company boards and is a member of the Board, audit and compensation committee of Cray, Inc., a public company. Mr. Turner also served on Symetra Material Fund (“SMF”) from 2012 to 2015 where he was Lead Director and on the Audit and Compensation Committee. SMF was a registered Investment Company. Mr. Turner brings financing expertise and knowledge of operational finance and accounting to the Board. Thomas M. Walker has served as a director of the Company since November 2013. Mr. Walker served as Executive Vice President of the Company from December 2012 through November 2013. Mr. Walker served as Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Company from May 2002 to December 2012. Prior to joining MicroVision, Mr. Walker served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of Advanced Radio Telecom Corp., a publicly held telecommunications company where he managed domestic and international legal affairs from April 1996 to April 2002. Prior to that, Mr. Walker advised publicly and privately held businesses while practicing in the Los Angeles offices of the law firms of Pillsbury Winthrop and Buchalter Nemer Fields and Younger. Mr. Walker holds a B.A. from Claremont McKenna College and a J.D. from the University of Oregon. Mr. Walker has an in depth knowledge of the Company’s business from his time spent as an executive of the Company and also brings an understanding of corporate governance and relevant legal topics to the Board. Slade Gorton has served as a director of the Company since September 2003. Mr. Gorton is Of Counsel at the law firm of K&L Gates, LLP. Prior to joining the firm, he represented Washington State in the United States Senate for 18 years. Mr. Gorton began his political career in 1958 as a Washington State Representative and went on to serve as State House Majority Leader. Mr. Gorton served as Attorney General of Washington from 1969- 1981, and during that time, he argued 14 cases before the United States Supreme Court. After leaving the Senate, Mr. Gorton served as a Commissioner on the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States (“9-11 Commission”); as a member of the National War Powers Commission and is Co-Chairman of the National Transportation Policy Project. Mr. Gorton also served in the U.S. Army, U.S. Air Force, and the U.S. Air Force Reserves. Mr. Gorton is a former Director of Clearwire, Inc. From his positions as an attorney, in business and government, and prior history as a director of the Company, Mr. Gorton brings expertise in legal matters, corporate governance, general leadership and the Company’s business and technology evolvement. Mr. Gorton is not standing for election at our Annual Meeting. Board Meetings and Committees Our Board of Directors met six times during 2018. All directors attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and meetings of the Board committees on which they served. We have adopted a policy that each of our -6- continuing directors be requested to attend our annual meeting each year. All directors then in office attended our annual meeting in 2018. Independence Determination No director will be deemed to be independent unless the Board affirmatively determines that the director has no material relationship with the Company, directly or as an officer, share owner, or partner of an organization that has a relationship with the Company. The Board observes all criteria for independence set forth in the Nasdaq listing standards and other governing laws and regulations. In its annual review of director independence, the Board considers all commercial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable, or other business relationships any director may have with us. As a result of its annual review, the Board has determined that all of the directors, with the exception of Mr. Mulligan and Mr. Farhi, are independent (the “Independent Directors”). The Independent Directors are identified by an asterisk in the table above. P r o x y The Nasdaq listing standards have both objective tests and a subjective test for determining who is an “independent director.” The objective tests state, for example, that a director is not considered independent if he or she is our employee or is a partner in or executive officer of an entity to which we made, or from which we received, payments in the current or any of the past three fiscal years that exceed 5% of the recipient’s consolidated gross revenue for that year. The subjective test states that an independent director must be a person who lacks a relationship that, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. None of the non-employee directors were disqualified from “independent” status under the objective tests. In assessing independence under the subjective test, the Board took into account the standards in the objective tests, and reviewed and discussed additional information provided by the directors and us with regard to each director’s business and personal activities as they may relate to us and our management. Based on all of the foregoing, as required by Nasdaq rules, the Board made a subjective determination as to each Independent Director that no relationship exists which, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director. The Board has not established categorical standards or guidelines to make these subjective determinations, but considers all relevant facts and circumstances. In addition to the Board-level standards for director independence, the directors who serve on the Audit Committee each satisfy standards established by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) providing that to qualify as “independent” for purposes of membership on that Committee, members of audit committees may not accept, directly or indirectly any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee from us other than their director compensation. Board’s Role in Risk Oversight It is management’s responsibility to manage risk and bring to the Board’s attention risks that are material to the Company. The Board has oversight responsibility of the processes established to report and monitor systems for the most significant risks applicable to the Company. The Board administers its risk oversight role directly and through its committee structure and the committees’ regular reports to the Board at Board meetings. The Board reviews strategic, financial and execution risks and exposures associated with the annual plan and multi- year plans, major litigation and other matters that may present material risk to our operations, plans, prospects or reputation; acquisitions and divestitures and senior management succession planning. Board Expertise and Diversity The Nominating Committee seeks to have a Board that represents diversity as to experience, gender, race and ethnicity, but does not have a formal policy with respect to diversity. We seek a Board that reflects a range of -7- talents, ages, skills, viewpoints, professional experience, educational background and expertise to provide sound and prudent guidance with respect to our operations and interests. All of our directors are financially literate, and two members of our Audit Committee are audit committee financial experts. Board Leadership Structure Our Board annually elects a Chairman of the Board. The Board has chosen to separate the roles of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Turner currently serves as Chairman and Lead Independent Director. In this role, among other duties, Mr. Turner meets with our Chief Executive Officer and with senior officers as necessary, schedules and presides at meetings of the Board, including meetings of the Independent Directors, serves as a liaison between the Board and our management, approves meeting schedules and agendas, and undertakes other responsibilities designated by the Board. The Board believes that the separate roles of Mr. Mulligan as Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Turner as Chairman and Lead Independent Director currently well serve the interests of us and our shareholders. Mr. Mulligan can devote his attention to leading the Company and focus on our business strategy. The Board believes that Mr. Turner provides an appropriate level of independence in the Company’s leadership through his review and approval of meeting agendas and his leadership of the Board. y x o r P Committees The Board of Directors has an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, and a Nominating Committee. The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for each of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating Committee. The full text of each charter is available on our website located at www.microvision.com. The Audit Committee The Board has an Audit Committee which assists the Board by monitoring and overseeing: (1) our accounting and financial reporting processes and the audits of our financial statements, (2) the integrity of our financial statements, (3) our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements, and (4) the performance of our internal finance and accounting personnel and our independent auditors. The Audit Committee conducts discussions related to our earnings announcements and periodic filings, as well as numerous other informal meetings and communications among the Chair, various Audit Committee members, the independent auditors and/or members of our management. Robert P. Carlile, Brian Turner and Thomas M. Walker currently serve on the Audit Committee, with Mr. Carlile serving as Chairman. The Audit Committee met four times during 2018. Among other matters, the Audit Committee monitors the activities and performance of our external auditors, including the audit scope, external audit fees, auditor independence matters and the extent to which the independent auditor may be retained to perform non-audit services. The Audit Committee and the Board of Directors have ultimate authority and responsibility to select, evaluate and, when appropriate, replace our independent auditor. The Audit Committee also reviews the results of the external audit work with regard to the adequacy and appropriateness of our financial accounting and internal controls. Management and independent auditor presentations to and discussions with the Audit Committee also cover various topics and events that may have significant financial impact or are the subject of discussions between management and the independent auditor. In addition, the Audit Committee generally oversees our internal financial controls and financial disclosure procedures. The “audit committee financial experts” designated by the Board are Robert P. Carlile and Brian Turner, each an independent director. Mr. Carlile has thirty-nine years of experience in various roles in Public Accounting at KPMG and Arthur Andersen. Mr. Turner has thirteen years of experience as a chief financial officer of four public companies and has thirteen years of experience in various roles at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, including Director, Corporate Finance. -8- The Compensation Committee The Compensation Committee makes decisions on behalf of, and recommendations to, the Board regarding salaries, incentives and other forms of compensation for directors, officers, and other key employees, and administers policies relating to compensation and benefits. The Compensation Committee’s charter provides the Compensation Committee with the authority to retain a compensation consulting firm in its discretion. In 2018 the Compensation Committee retained Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Meridian”) to provide independent compensation consulting services after assessing the independence and determining that there was no conflict of interest. Meridian advised the Compensation Committee on a variety of matters including executive and director compensation, pay philosophy, compensation peer group, competitive market information, incentive plan design for annual and long-term incentive compensation, emerging best practices in compensation matters and alignment of executive and director compensation with shareholder interests. The Compensation Committee also serves as the Plan Administrator for our stock option plans pursuant to authority delegated by the Board. Slade Gorton, Bernee D.L. Strom, and Robert P. Carlile currently serve as members of the Compensation Committee, with Ms. Strom serving as Chairperson. Mr. Gorton will not be continuing as a director following the Annual Meeting. The Compensation Committee met four times during 2018. P r o x y The Nominating Committee The Nominating Committee counsels the Board of Directors with respect to Board and committee structure and membership. In fulfilling its duties, the Nominating Committee, among other things, will: • • • • • • establish criteria for nomination to the Board and its committees, taking into account the composition of the Board as a whole; identify, review, and recommend director candidates for the Board; recommend directors for election at the annual meeting of shareholders and to fill new or vacant positions; establish policies with respect to the process by which our shareholders may recommend candidates to the Nominating Committee for consideration for nomination as a director; assess and monitor, with Board involvement, the performance of the Board; and recommend directors for membership on Board Committees. Bernee D.L. Strom, Slade Gorton and Brian Turner currently serve as members of the Nominating Committee, with Mr. Turner serving as Chairman. Mr. Gorton will not be continuing as a director following the Annual Meeting. The Nominating Committee met twice during 2018. The Nominating Committee will consider recommendations for directorships submitted by shareholders, or groups of shareholders, that have beneficially owned at least 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock for at least one year prior to the date the nominating shareholder submits a candidate for nomination as a director. A nominating shareholder or group of nominating shareholders may submit only one candidate for consideration. Shareholders who wish the Nominating Committee to consider their recommendations for nominees for the position of director should submit their request in writing no later than the 120th calendar day before the anniversary of the date of the prior year’s annual meeting proxy statement was released to shareholders. Such written requests should be submitted to the Nominating Committee care of the Corporate Secretary, MicroVision, Inc., 6244 185th Avenue NE, Suite 100, Redmond, Washington 98052, and must contain the following information: • The name, address, and number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by the nominating shareholder and each participant in a nominating shareholder group (including the name and address of all beneficial owners of more than 5% of the equity interests of a nominating shareholder or participant in a nominating shareholder group); -9- y x o r P • A representation that the nominating shareholder, or nominating shareholder group, has been the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock for at least one year and will continue to beneficially own at least 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock through the date of the annual meeting; • A description of all relationships, arrangements, or understandings between or among the nominating shareholder (or any participant in a nominating shareholder group) and the candidate or any other person or entity regarding the candidate, including the name of such person or entity; • All information regarding the candidate that we would be required to disclose in a proxy statement filed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC with respect to a meeting at which the candidate would stand for election; • Confirmation that the candidate is independent, with respect to the Company, under the independence requirements established by us, the SEC, and Nasdaq listing requirements, or, if the candidate is not independent with respect to the Company under all such criteria, a description of the reasons why the candidate is not independent; • The consent of the candidate to be named as a nominee and to serve as a member of the Board if nominated and elected; • A representation signed by the candidate that if elected he or she will: (1) represent all shareholders of the Company in accordance with applicable laws, and our certificate of incorporation, by-laws, and other policies; (2) comply with all rules, policies, or requirements generally applicable to non-employee directors; and (3) upon request, complete and sign customary Directors and Officers Questionnaires. In its assessment of each potential candidate, the Nominating Committee will review the nominee’s judgment, experience, independence, understanding of our or other related industries and such other factors the Nominating Committee determines are pertinent in light of the current needs of the Board. The Nominating Committee will also take into account the ability of a director to devote the time and effort necessary to fulfill his or her responsibilities. Nominees may be suggested by directors, members of management, and, as described above, by shareholders. In identifying and considering candidates for nomination to the Board, the Nominating Committee considers, in addition to the requirements set out in the Nominating Committee charter, quality of experience, our needs and the range of talent and experience represented on the Board. Shareholder Communication with the Board of Directors We have adopted written procedures establishing a process by which our shareholders can communicate with the Board of Directors regarding various topics related to the Company. A shareholder desiring to communicate with the Board, or any individual director, should send his or her written message to the Board of Directors (or the applicable director or directors) care of the Corporate Secretary, MicroVision, Inc., 6244 185th Avenue NE, Suite 100, Redmond, Washington 98052. Each submission will be forwarded, without editing or alteration, by the Secretary of the Company to the Board, or the applicable director or directors, on or prior to the next scheduled meeting of the Board. The Board will determine the method by which such submission will be reviewed and considered. The Board may also request the submitting shareholder to furnish additional information it may reasonably require or deem necessary to sufficiently review and consider the submission of such shareholder. Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires that our directors, executive officers, and greater-than 10% shareholders file reports with the SEC relating to their initial beneficial ownership of our securities and any subsequent changes. They must also provide us with copies of the reports. -10- Based solely on a review of the copies of such forms in our possession, and on written representations from reporting persons, we believe that all of these reporting persons complied with their filing requirements during 2018. Code of Ethics We have adopted a code of ethics applicable to all of our executive officers, known as the Code of Ethics for MicroVision Executives. We have also adopted a code of conduct applicable to our directors, officers, and employees, known as the Code of Conduct. The Code of Ethics for MicroVision Executives and the Code of Conduct are available on our website. In the event that we amend or waive any of the provisions of the Code of Ethics for MicroVision Executives we intend to disclose the same on our website at www.microvision.com. P r o x y -11- y x o r P Proposal Two—Amendment of the 2013 MicroVision, Inc. Incentive Plan The Board of Directors has authorized an amendment to the 2013 MicroVision, Inc. Incentive Plan (as amended, the “Incentive Plan”), subject to shareholder approval. The amendment will increase the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance upon exercise of options granted under the Incentive Plan by 1,500,000 to a total of 12,300,000 shares. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE FOREGOING AMENDMENT OF THE 2013 MICROVISION, INC. INCENTIVE PLAN. Summary of the Incentive Plan The Incentive Plan amended, restated and renamed our 2006 Incentive Plan. The Incentive Plan was originally adopted by the Board in 2013 and approved by the shareholders in June of 2013. The Incentive Plan will terminate on the tenth anniversary of the date of approval by the shareholders, unless earlier terminated by the Board. If the proposed amendment to the Incentive Plan is approved, a maximum of 12,300,000 shares of common stock may be delivered in satisfaction of awards made under the Incentive Plan. The maximum number of shares of common stock for which stock options may be granted to any person in any calendar year and the maximum number of shares of common stock subject to stock appreciation rights, or “SARs,” granted to any person in any calendar year will each be 250,000. The maximum benefit that will be paid to any person under other awards in any calendar year will be, to the extent paid in shares, 250,000 shares, and, to the extent paid in cash, $3,000,000. In the event of a stock dividend, stock split or other change in our capital structure, the Administrator will make appropriate adjustments to the limits described above and will also make appropriate adjustments to the number and kind of shares of stock or securities subject to awards, any exercise prices relating to awards and any other provisions of awards affected by the change. The Administrator may also make similar adjustments to take into account other distributions to stockholders or any other event, if the Administrator determines that adjustments are appropriate to avoid distortion in the operation of the Incentive Plan and to preserve the value of awards. Administration. The Board of Directors administers the Incentive Plan. The term “Administrator” is used in this Proxy Statement to refer to the person (the Board and its delegates) charged with administering the Incentive Plan. The Administrator has full authority to determine who will receive awards and to determine the types of awards to be granted as well as the amounts, terms, and conditions of any awards. Awards may be in the form of options, SARs, restricted or unrestricted stock, deferred stock, other stock-based awards, or cash awards, and any such award may be a performance-based award. The Administrator has the right to determine any questions that may arise regarding the interpretation and application of the provisions of the Incentive Plan and to make, administer, and interpret such rules and regulations as it deems necessary or advisable. Determinations of the Administrator made under the Incentive Plan are conclusive and bind all parties. Eligibility. Participation is limited to employees, non-employee directors, as well as consultants and advisors who are selected by the Administrator to receive an award. The group of persons from which the Administrator will select participants consisted of approximately 120 individuals as of March 29, 2019. Stock Options. The Administrator may, from time to time, award options to any participant subject to the limitations described above. Stock options give the holder the right to purchase shares of common stock of the Company within a specified period of time at a specified price. Two types of stock options may be granted under the Incentive Plan: incentive stock options, or “ISOs”, which are subject to special tax treatment as described below, and nonstatutory options, or “NSOs.” Eligibility for ISOs is limited to employees of the Company and its subsidiaries. The exercise price of an ISO cannot be less than the fair market value of the common stock at the time of grant. In addition, the expiration date of an ISO cannot be more than ten years after the date of the original grant. -12- P r o x y In the case of NSOs, the exercise price and the expiration date are determined in the discretion of the Administrator. The Administrator also determines all other terms and conditions related to the exercise of an option, including the consideration to be paid, if any, for the grant of the option, the time at which options may be exercised and conditions related to the exercise of options. Stock Appreciation Rights. The Administrator may grant SARs under the Incentive Plan. An SAR entitles the holder upon exercise to receive an amount in cash or common stock or a combination thereof (as determined by the Administrator) computed by reference to appreciation in the value of a share of common stock above a base amount which may not be less than fair market value on the date of grant. Stock Awards; Deferred Stock. The Incentive Plan provides for awards of nontransferable shares of restricted common stock, as well as unrestricted shares of common stock. Awards of restricted stock and unrestricted stock may be made in exchange for past services or other lawful consideration. Generally, awards of restricted stock are subject to the requirement that the shares be forfeited or resold to the Company unless specified conditions are met. Subject to these restrictions, conditions and forfeiture provisions, any recipient of an award of restricted stock will have all the rights of a stockholder of the Company, including the right to vote the shares and to receive dividends. Other awards under the Incentive Plan may also be settled with restricted stock. The Incentive Plan also provides for deferred grants (“deferred stock”) entitling the recipient to receive shares of common stock in the future on such conditions as the Administrator may specify. Any stock award or award of deferred stock resulting in a deferral of compensation subject to Section 409A of the Code will be construed to the maximum extent possible consistent with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code. Performance Awards. The Administrator may also make awards subject to the satisfaction of specified performance criteria. Performance awards may consist of common stock or cash or a combination of the two. The performance criteria used in connection with a particular performance award will be determined by the Administrator. The Administrator will determine whether the performance targets or goals that have been chosen for a particular performance award have been met. General Provisions Applicable to All Awards. Neither ISOs nor, except as the Administrator otherwise expressly provides, other awards may be transferred other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution. During a recipient’s lifetime, an ISO and, except as the Administrator may provide, other non-transferable awards requiring exercise may be exercised only by the recipient. Shares delivered under the Incentive Plan may consist of either authorized but unissued or treasury shares. The number of shares delivered upon exercise of a stock option is determined net of any shares transferred by the optionee to the Company (including through the holding back of shares that would otherwise have been deliverable upon exercise) in payment of the exercise price or tax withholding. Mergers and Similar Transactions. In the event of a consolidation or merger in which the Company is not the surviving corporation or which results in the acquisition of substantially all of the Company’s stock by a person or entity or by a group of persons or entities acting together, or in the event of a sale of substantially all of the Company’s assets or a dissolution or liquidation of the Company, the following rules will apply except as otherwise provided in an Award: • • If the transaction is one in which there is an acquiring or surviving entity, the Administrator may provide for the assumption of some or all of the outstanding awards or for the grant of new awards in substitution therefor by the acquiror or survivor. If the transaction is one in which holders of common stock will receive a payment (whether cash, non-cash or a combination), the Administrator may provide for a “cash-out”, with respect to some or all awards, equal in the case of each affected award to the excess, if any, of (A) the fair market value of one share of common stock times the number of shares of common stock subject to the award, over (B) the aggregate exercise or purchase price, if any, under the award (in the case of an SAR, the aggregate base price above which appreciation is measured), in each case on such payment terms and other terms, and subject to such conditions, as the Administrator determines. -13- y x o r P • If there is no assumption or substitution of any award requiring exercise, each such outstanding award will become fully exercisable prior to the completion of the transaction on a basis that gives the holder of the award a reasonable opportunity to exercise the award and participate in the transaction as a stockholder. • Each award, other than outstanding shares of restricted stock, unless assumed will terminate upon consummation of the transaction. • Any share of common stock delivered pursuant to the “cash-out” or acceleration of an award, as described above, may, in the discretion of the Administrator, contain such restrictions, if any, as the Administrator deems appropriate to reflect any performance or other vesting conditions to which the award was subject. In the case of restricted stock, the Administrator may require that any amounts delivered, exchanged or otherwise paid in respect of such stock in connection with the transaction be placed in escrow or otherwise made subject to such restrictions as the Administrator deems appropriate to carry out the intent of the Incentive Plan. Amendment. The Administrator may at any time or times amend the Incentive Plan or any outstanding Award for any purpose which may at the time be permitted by law, and may at any time terminate the Incentive Plan as to any future grants of awards. The Administrator may not, however, alter the terms of an Award so as to affect adversely the Participant’s rights under the Award without the Participant’s consent, unless the Administrator expressly reserved the right to do so at the time of the Award. Federal Income Tax Consequences The following discussion summarizes certain federal income tax consequences of the grant and exercise of stock options under the Incentive Plan under the law as in effect on the date of this Proxy Statement. The summary does not purport to cover federal employment tax or other federal tax consequences that may be associated with stock options or federal tax consequences associated with other awards under the Incentive Plan, nor does it cover state, local or non-U.S. taxes. ISOs. In general, an optionee realizes no taxable income for regular income tax purposes upon the grant or exercise of an ISO. However, the exercise of an ISO may result in an alternative minimum tax liability to the optionee. With certain exceptions, a disposition of shares purchased under an ISO within two years from the date of grant or within one year after exercise (a “disqualifying disposition”) produces ordinary income to the optionee equal to the value of the shares at the time of exercise less the exercise price. A corresponding deduction is available to the Company. Any additional gain recognized in the disqualifying disposition is treated as a capital gain for which the Company is not entitled to a deduction. In general, if the disqualifying disposition is an arm’s length sale at less than the fair market value of the shares at time of exercise, the optionee’s ordinary income, and the Company’s corresponding deduction, are limited to the excess, if any, of the amount realized on the sale over the amount paid by the optionee for the stock. If the optionee does not dispose of the shares until after the expiration of these one- and two-year holding periods, any gain or loss recognized upon a subsequent sale is treated as a long-term capital gain or loss for which the Company is not entitled to a deduction. NSOs. In general, in the case of a NSO, the optionee has no taxable income at the time of grant but realizes income in connection with exercise of the option in an amount equal to the excess (at the time of exercise) of the fair market value of the shares acquired upon exercise over the exercise price; a corresponding deduction is available to the Company; and upon a subsequent sale or exchange of the shares, any recognized gain or loss after the date of exercise is treated as a capital gain or loss for which the Company is not entitled to a deduction. In general, an ISO that is exercised by the optionee more than three months after termination of employment is treated as an NSO. ISOs are also treated as NSOs to the extent they first become exercisable by an individual in any calendar year for shares having a fair market value (determined as of the date of grant) in excess of $100,000. -14- The Administrator may award stock options that are exercisable for restricted stock. Under Section 83 of the Code, an optionee who exercises an NSO for restricted stock will generally have income only when the stock vests. The income will equal the fair market value of the stock at that time less the exercise price. However, the optionee may make a so-called “83(b) election” in connection with the exercise to recognize taxable income at that time. Assuming no other applicable limitations, the amount and timing of the deduction available to the Company will correspond to the income recognized by the optionee. If an ISO is exercised for restricted stock, a timely 83(b) election will have the effect, in general, of fixing the amount taken into account for alternative minimum tax purposes at the excess of the fair market value of the shares at time of exercise over the exercise price. However, for regular income tax purposes the ordinary income and corresponding Company deduction associated with a disqualifying disposition of stock acquired upon exercise of an ISO, where the stock was restricted at time of exercise but vested prior to the disposition, would be determined by reference to the fair market value of the shares on the date of vesting whether or not the optionee made an 83(b) election. Under the so-called “golden parachute” provisions of the Code, the accelerated vesting of awards in connection with a change in control of the Company may be required to be valued and taken into account in determining whether a participant has received compensatory payments, contingent on the change in control, in excess of certain limits. If these limits are exceeded, a substantial portion of amounts payable to the participant, including the payment consisting of accelerated vesting of awards, may be subject to an additional 20% federal tax and may be nondeductible to the Company. Under Section 162(m) of the Code, remuneration in excess of $1 million is generally nondeductible if paid to any “covered employee” of a publicly held corporation (generally the corporation’s chief executive officer, chief financial officer and its next three most highly compensated executive officers in the year that the compensation is paid). Stock options awarded under the Incentive Plan are intended to be exempt from the rules of Section 409A of the Code and guidance issued thereunder and will be administered accordingly. However, neither the Company nor the Administrator, nor any person affiliated with or acting on behalf of the Company or the Administrator, will be liable to any participant or to the estate or beneficiary of any participant by reason of any acceleration of income, or any additional tax or interest penalties, resulting from the failure of an award to satisfy the requirements of Section 409A of the Code. P r o x y -15- Proposal Three—Ratification of the Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm The Audit Committee of the Board has selected Moss Adams LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the current fiscal year, subject to ratification by the Company’s stockholders at the Annual Meeting. The Company has been advised by Moss Adams LLP that it is a registered public accounting firm with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”) and complies with the auditing, quality control, and independence standards and rules of the PCAOB and the SEC. A representative of Moss Adams LLP is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting to respond to appropriate questions and to make a statement if he or she so desires. y x o r P Although stockholder ratification of the selection of Moss Adams LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is not required, the Board is nevertheless submitting the selection of Moss Adams LLP to the stockholders for ratification. Unless contrary instructions are given, shares represented by proxies solicited by the Board will be voted for the ratification of the selection of Moss Adams LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the year ending December 31, 2019. Should the selection of Moss Adams LLP not be ratified by the stockholders, the Audit Committee will reconsider the matter. Even in the event the selection of Moss Adams LLP is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE SELECTION OF MOSS ADAMS LLP AS THE COMPANY’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM. -16- Proposal Four—Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation The Executive Compensation section beginning on page 18 of this Proxy Statement shows 2018 compensation information for our named executive officers. The Board is asking shareholders to cast a non-binding, advisory vote FOR the approval of the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in the Executive Compensation section. Our executive compensation program embodies a pay-for-performance philosophy that is intended to support the Company’s business strategy and align the interests of our executives with our shareholders. For these reasons, the Board is asking shareholders to support this proposal. Although the vote we are asking you to cast is non-binding, the Compensation Committee and the Board value the views of our shareholders and will consider the outcome of the vote when determining future compensation arrangements for our named executive officers. The Company is providing a vote on this proposal pursuant to Section 14A of the Exchange Act and has determined that it will hold advisory votes on executive compensation each year. P r o x y THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS. OTHER BUSINESS The Company knows of no other matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the meeting. If, however, other matters are presented for a vote at the meeting, the proxy holders (the individuals designated on the proxy card) will vote your shares according to their judgment on those matters. -17- Executive Compensation Overview EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The Company’s executive compensation program is designed to attract, retain, motivate and recognize high performance executive officers. The Compensation Committee is responsible for and oversees the Company’s compensation program. The Company’s philosophy is to provide compensation programs that incentivize and reward both the short and long-term performance of the executive officers relative to the Company’s performance. Thus, the Compensation Committee utilizes compensation components that measure overall Company performance, including performance against the Company’s annual strategic operating plan. In addition, the Compensation Committee seeks to align the interests of the Company’s executive officers with its shareholders. y x o r P The principal elements of the Company’s compensation are base salary, incentive bonus awards, and equity awards. The Company’s executive compensation policy recognizes that stock price is only one measure of performance, and given industry business conditions and the long-term strategic direction and goals of the Company, it may not necessarily be the best current measure of executive performance. Thus, the Compensation Committee considers the median level of compensation of its peer group, competitive market information, and the achievement of the Company’s business objectives when determining executive compensation. Base Salary. Base salaries for the named executive officers are primarily based on the position, taking into account competitive market compensation paid by other companies in the Company’s peer group for similar positions. Recommendations from management regarding each named executive officer’s base salary based on management’s evaluation of the executive officer’s performance are also taken into account. As with total executive compensation, the Compensation Committee believes that executive base salaries should generally target the median base salary of the Company’s peer group. Each named executive officer’s base salary is also determined by reviewing the other components of the executive officer’s compensation to ensure that the total compensation is in line with the Compensation Committee’s overall compensation philosophy. Salaries for 2018 were based on the compensation objectives mentioned above and, in the case of Mr. Mulligan, his employment agreement. Base salary rates in 2018 for Messrs. Mulligan, Holt and Sharma were $350,000, $255,905 and $280,000, respectively. Incentive Bonus. The Compensation Committee believes that a portion of an executive officer’s total compensation, an incentive bonus, should be based on the Company’s performance. The Compensation Committee believes that structuring a significant portion of each executive officer’s annual cash compensation as an incentive bonus, and the contingent nature of that compensation, induces an executive officer to execute on both the short and long-term goals of the Company. It has structured the executive compensation program to reflect this philosophy by creating an incentive bonus framework that translates Company financial and operational performance into incentive bonuses. Each of the named executive officers is eligible for an annual incentive bonus. The amount of the bonus depends generally on the level of Company performance, with a target set as a percentage of base salary. The Compensation Committee approves the target bonus percentages and the actual bonus awards for all executive officers. Target bonus percentages are set to be approximately at the median of the Company’s peer group. In 2018, the Compensation Committee approved 65% as a target bonus award (as a percentage of base salary) for Mr. Mulligan, 50% for Mr. Sharma and 40% for Mr. Holt. The amount of the bonus actually awarded to executives is determined solely in the discretion of the Compensation Committee for all executive officers. Based on its review of management’s evaluation of the Company’s performance in 2018, the Compensation Committee, using its discretionary authority, determined that each named executive officer met his performance -18- objectives with respect to his 2018 annual incentive bonus. The timing of the payments and the form (cash or equity awards) have not yet been determined. Equity Awards. The Compensation Committee believes that equity participation is a key component of the Company’s executive compensation program. Equity awards are designed to attract and retain executive officers and to motivate them to enhance shareholder value by aligning the financial interests of executive officers with those of shareholders. Each year the Compensation Committee reviews the size and composition of the equity grants to ensure that they are aligned with the Company’s compensation philosophy of compensating executives at the median of the Company’s peer group. Similar to base salary, a review of equity award levels is conducted to ensure that a named executive officer’s equity compensation comports with the Compensation Committee’s overall philosophy and objectives and is competitive with the Company’s peer group. The Compensation Committee’s practice is to make annual equity awards as part of its overall philosophy of performance-based compensation. Restricted stock units and stock options are awarded by the Compensation Committee to executive officers based on a philosophy of providing equity incentives at the median of the Company’s peer group. P r o x y Believing that it is important that our CEO and other executive officers have interests that are aligned with the long-term interests of the Company and its shareholders, we have adopted a stock retention policy that requires the CEO and other executive officers to obtain over time and then retain equity with a minimum value of five times base salary in the case of the CEO and three times base salary in the case of other executives. In 2018, Messrs. Mulligan, Holt and Sharma were awarded (i) 83,333, 66,667, and 75,000 restricted stock units (“RSUs”), respectively, one-third of which would vest annually over three years based on continuous service and (ii) 166,667, 133,333 and 150,000 of performance based stock units (“PBSUs”), respectively, that are eligible to vest annually over three years subject to meeting the continuous service requirement as well as the performance criteria based on appreciation of the Company’s publicly traded common stock price. In 2018, the Compensation Committee reviewed information regarding compensation of the Company’s peer group identified by an independent compensation consultant and additional compensation information about other similar publicly traded companies. The Board believes that a switch from stock options to RSUs is necessary to continue to attract and retain talent in the years ahead and directly aligns our executive’s interests and shareholder interests. To further align the interests of our executives with those of our shareholders, the Compensation Committee added the performance vesting criteria to the PBSUs that would require significant appreciation of the Company’s stock price. -19- Summary Compensation Table for 2018 The following table provides information regarding the compensation we paid to each of our executive officers named below (our “named executive officers”) during the last two fiscal years. Name and Principal Position Fiscal Year Salary ($) Bonus ($)(2) Stock Awards ($)(3) Perry M. Mulligan(1) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chief Executive Officer and Director Stephen P. Holt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chief Financial Officer Sumit Sharma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chief Operating Officer 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 350,000 93,728 25,000 105,950 — 215,750 255,905 230,186 266,895 213,333 72.500 62,770 70,600 60,600 84,760 — — 64,012 95,355 — — 128,023 Option Awards ($)(3) — 114,119 All Other Compensation ($)(4)(5) 6,423 75,672 8,250 6,215 8,882 5,143 Total ($) 487,373 499,269 421,415 363,183 441,132 407,099 y x o r P (1) Mr. Mulligan’s compensation for fiscal 2017 includes the following payments to him in his capacity as Director prior to his appointment as Chief Executive Officer in November 2017: salary, $46,000 (representing director fees earned or paid in cash); stock awards, $19,500. (2) Bonuses payable in year presented, earned in prior year. Bonuses earned in 2018 have been determined to be 100% of the target for each of the named executives. Mr. Mulligan’s bonus is valued at $227,500, Mr. Holt’s bonus is valued at $102,362 and Mr. Sharma’s bonus is valued at $140,000. The timing of the payments and the form (cash or equity awards) have not yet been determined. (3) Reflects the fair value of stock and option awards on the grant date in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. (4) Perquisites and other personal benefits are valued on an aggregate incremental cost basis. All figures shown below represent the direct dollar cost incurred in providing these perquisites and other personal benefits to the named executive officers. (5) The table below shows all other amounts under All Other Compensation for fiscal 2017 and 2018: Name and Principal Position Perry M. Mulligan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chief Executive Officer and Director Stephen P. Holt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chief Financial Officer Sumit Sharma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Chief Operating Officer Fiscal Year 2018 2017 2018 2017 2018 2017 Prerequisites and Personal Benefits Employer Contribution to 401(k) Account (6) — — — — — — 6,423 8,250 6,215 8,282 5,143 Relocation Payments (7) — 75,672 — — — — (6) This column represents the amount of matching contributions made to our qualified 401(k) retirement plan for each of our named executive officers. In June 2015, the Company began making contributions to our qualified 401(k) retirement plan for all employees. (7) This column represents the reimbursement of Mr. Mulligan’s relocation expenses in connection with his employment as Chief Executive Officer in fiscal 2017 pursuant to his Employment Agreement described below. -20- Outstanding Equity Awards at Year End 2018 The following table shows outstanding equity awards for our named executive officers as of December 31, 2018: Name Perry M. Mulligan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stephen P. Holt . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sumit Sharma . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable (3)(5) (4)(5) (4)(5) (4)(5) (1) (1) (2) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) (1) 1,875 1,875 1,875 15,000 31,250 40,000 40,000 50,000 37,500 25,000 16,250 15,000 25,000 32,500 — — — — 93,750 — — — 12,500 25,000 48,750 5,000 25,000 97,500 Option Exercise Price ($) Option Expiration Date 7/30/2020 22.64 7/30/2020 22.64 6/9/2021 9.20 6/7/2022 3.08 1.57 11/13/2027 5/7/2023 2.20 8/8/2023 2.28 6/3/2024 1.76 6/2/2025 3.26 6/1/2026 1.89 2/8/2027 1.67 10/7/2025 3.16 6/1/2026 1.89 2/8/2027 1.67 Number of Shares of Stock That Have Not Vested Market Value of Shares of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)(9) 93,750(6) 166,667(7) 83,333(8) 56,616 100,650 50,325 133,333(7) 66,667(8) — — — — 150,000(7) 75,000(8) — 80,520 40,260 — — — — 90,585 45,293 — P r o x y (1) The indicated option vests 25% on each anniversary of the grant date. (2) The indicated option vests 33% on each anniversary of the grant date. (3) The indicated options vested 100% on the date of grant. (4) The indicated option vests on the earlier of the day prior to the date of the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders next following the date of grant, or one year from the date of grant. (5) The indicated option was awarded to Mr. Mulligan as a member of the Board of Directors. (6) The indicated restricted stock units vest 25% on 11/13/2018, 25% on 11/13/2019, 25% on 11/13/2020 and 25% on 11/13/2021. (7) The performance criteria is the achievement of the Company’s share price of $2.50 sustained for 60 of trailing 90 days before the PSUs are earned (“Earned PSUs”). To the extent the PSUs become Earned PSUs they shall be eligible to vest as to one-third (1/3) of the PSUs subject to the Award on the each of the first three (3) anniversaries of June 5, 2018, subject to the executive’s continuous employment on the applicable vesting date. If there are outstanding but unearned PSUs as of a vesting date and the PSUs become Earned PSUs prior to the next vesting date the Earned PSUs that would have vested on any earlier vesting date shall become immediately vested and deliverable. (8) The indicated restricted stock units vest 33% on 6/5/2019, 33% on 6/5/2020 and 34% on 6/5/2021. (9) The market value of shares of stock that have not vested is based on a price per share of $0.6039, the closing sale price of the Company’s common stock as of December 31, 2018 as reported by Nasdaq. Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control All of our named executive officers, except Mr. Mulligan, are employed at will and do not have employment agreements. Mr. Mulligan’s employment agreement is summarized below. Under the 2013 Incentive Plan, 100% of each of the named executive officers’ options which have not been exercised will become fully vested and immediately exercisable upon a change of control of the Company that does not result in an assumption, substitution or pay off of such award by the acquiring company. In addition, 100% of each named executive officer’s restricted stock units will become fully vested upon a change of control at the Company. With respect to PBSUs issued the named executive officers in 2018, in the event a change of control occurs before the performance criteria is met, the PBSUs would vest in part based on the fair market value of the Company as common stock as determined by the Compensation Committee in connection with the change of control on a straight line basis between $1.75 and $2.50, with 40% vesting at $1.75 and 100% at $2.50. -21- y x o r P Severance and Employment Agreements Mr. Mulligan’s Employment Agreement Payment upon Termination. Under Mr. Mulligan’s employment agreement with the Company dated November 21, 2017, if he dies, becomes disabled, retires, terminates his employment other than for “good reason” or is terminated by us for “cause,” he will be provided his earned but unpaid base salary, earned but unused vacation time, any bonus compensation for the prior year which is unpaid on the date of termination to the extent bonuses are paid to other officers, 12 months of certain group and medical benefits for Mr. Mulligan’s family and any business expenses which have not yet been reimbursed by us. If we terminate him “other than for cause,” or if he terminates his employment for “good reason,” he will receive, in addition to the amounts listed in the foregoing sentence, his base salary for 12 months following the date of his termination, plus an amount equal to his target bonus for the year prior to the termination, and we will continue to pay certain group medical and dental expenses in that 12-month period. We do not accelerate the vesting of equity incentives for our executive officers in the event of a termination of employment. In the event of a change in control of the Company, all unvested stock options vest upon the change in control if the change in control does not result in an assumption, substitution or pay off of such award by the acquiring company, and the Compensation Committee has the discretion to remove the vesting restrictions on all unvested restricted shares. In determining whether a termination occurred with or without “cause,” “cause” is deemed to exist under Mr. Mulligan’s employment agreement when there is a repeated willful failure to perform or gross negligence in the performance of his duties; fraud, embezzlement or other dishonesty with respect to us; a breach of his obligations of confidentiality, non-competition, or non-solicitation against us; or commission of a felony or other crime involving moral turpitude. In determining whether Mr. Mulligan has “good reason” to terminate his employment, “good reason” is deemed to exist when: we have failed to continue him in a certain position; there is a material diminution in the nature and scope of his responsibilities; there is a material failure of us to provide him with base salary and benefits, excluding an inadvertent failure which is cured within a certain time period; or his office is relocated more than thirty-five miles from the then-current location of our principal offices without his consent. Mr. Mulligan may only terminate his employment for good reason if he (a) gives notice to us within ninety (90) days of the initial occurrence of the event or condition constituting good reason, setting forth in reasonable detail the nature of such good reason; (b) we fail to cure within thirty (30) days following such notice; and (c) Mr. Mulligan terminates his employment within thirty (30) days following the end of the thirty (30)-day cure period (if we fail to cure). Payment upon a Change in Control. In the event of a change of control and the termination of Mr. Mulligan’s employment “other than for cause” by us within two years following a change of control, we must pay Mr. Mulligan an amount equal to one year of base salary plus a payment equal to his target bonus. The foregoing amount will be paid in a single lump sum. We must also pay the full cost of Mr. Mulligan’s continued participation in our group health and dental plans for two years or, if less, for so long as he remains entitled to continue such participation under applicable law. In addition, 100% of his equity-based or equity-linked awards which have not been exercised and have not expired or been surrendered or cancelled, will become exercisable in accordance with the applicable award agreement. Our obligation to pay the severance amounts mentioned in this “Payments upon a Termination or Change in Control” section is subject to Mr. Mulligan signing an employee release. Also, Mr. Mulligan must comply with certain confidential information and assignment of intellectual property obligations. Further, Mr. Mulligan is subject to a non-compete and non-solicit obligation for 12 months following his termination. -22- P r o x y Change of Control Severance Plan In November 2011, the Company adopted a Change of Control Severance Plan (the “Severance Plan”). Under the Severance Plan, a “change of control” is defined as the occurrence of any of the following events: (i) the acquisition by any person or group of more than 50% of the then outstanding securities of the Company entitled to vote generally in the election of directors; (ii) individuals who constitute the board of directors cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the board, provided, however, that any individual becoming a director whose election, or nomination for election, by the Company’s shareholders, was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the incumbent directors are considered as though such individual were a member of the incumbent board; (iii) certain reorganizations, recapitalizations, mergers or consolidations; (iv) the sale, transfer or other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of the Company; or (v) approval by the shareholders of the Company of a complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company. In the event that a “designated participant,” including Stephen Holt and Sumit Sharma, is terminated on, or during the two-year period following, a change of control, for any reason other than by the Company for cause (or, in the case of a participant other than a designated participant, any termination of the participant’s employment, on or during the eighteen-month period following a change of control, by the Company other than for cause or by the participant for good reason), the Company will pay the participant an amount equal to one year of base salary at the rate in effect at the date of termination or, if higher, on the date of the change of control, plus a payment equal to the target bonus for which the participant is eligible, which amount shall be payable within ten business days following the later of the effective date of the release of claims described below or the date it is received by the Company. If, however, the timing associated with the execution, revocation and effectiveness of the release of claims would otherwise allow the payment described above to be made in either of two taxable years, such payment will not be made prior to the first day of the second taxable year. The Company will also pay the full cost of the participant’s continued participation in the Company’s group health and dental plans for one year or, if less, for so long as the participant remains entitled to continue such participation under applicable law. In addition, all options held by the participant which are not exercisable, and which have not been exercised and have not expired or been surrendered or cancelled, will become initially exercisable upon termination and will otherwise be and remain exercisable in accordance with their terms, and all other equity- based compensation awards granted to the participant, including, restricted stock and restricted stock units, will become vested and become free of restrictions. Payment under the Plan is contingent upon the participant executing and delivering to the Company a release from all claims in any way resulting from, arising out of or connected with such participant’s employment with the Company. Pay Ratio Following is a reasonable estimate, prepared under applicable SEC rules, of the ratio of the annual total compensation of Perry Mulligan, our Chief Executive Officer compared to the median of the annual total compensation of our other employees. We determined our median employee based on base salary (annualized in the case of full- and part-time employees who joined the Company during 2018) of each of our 107 employees (excluding Mr. Mulligan) as of December 31, 2018. The annual total compensation of our median employee (other than Mr. Mulligan) for 2018 including base salary, bonus and equity grant was $147,705. Mr. Mulligan’s total compensation for 2018, including base salary, bonus and equity grant was $487,373. Based on the foregoing, our estimate of the ratio of the annual total compensation of the Chief Executive Officer to the median of the annual total compensation of all other employees was 3.3 to 1. Given the different -23- methods that other public companies may use to determine an estimated pay ratio, the estimated ratio reported above should not be used as a basis for comparison between companies. Director Compensation for 2018 The following table provides information concerning our non-employee directors during the year ended December 31, 2018. Mr. Mulligan’s compensation information is provided with the other named executive officers in the “Executive Compensation” section above. Name Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) Stock Awards ($)(1)(4) Option Awards ($)(2)(4) Total ($) y x o r P Simon Biddiscombe(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Robert P. Carlile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yalon Farhi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Slade Gorton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bernee D.L. Strom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Brian Turner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thomas M. Walker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . — 46,000 37,000 38,000 43,000 55,250 42,250 — 36,300 36,300 36,300 36,300 36,300 36,300 10,336 — — — — — — 10,336 82,300 73,300 74,300 79,300 91,550 78,550 (1) Reflects the fair value of stock awards granted in 2018 in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. (2) Reflects the fair value of option awards on the grant date in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. (3) Simon Biddiscombe was appointed to our Board in December 2018. (4) The following table shows the number of outstanding shares underlying option and stock awards for each of our non-employee directors as of December 31, 2018: Name Simon Biddiscombe . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Robert P. Carlile . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yalon Farhi . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Slade Gorton . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bernee D.L. Strom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Brian Turner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thomas M. Walker . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Option Awards 30,000 30,000 30,000 20,625 30,000 20,625 169,222 Stock Awards (5) — 40,000 40,000 81,974 30,000 81,974 91,839 (5) 30,000 shares vest on the date that is the earlier of one year from the September 30, 2018 grant date, or the day before the next scheduled annual meeting of shareholders. Each non-employee director is granted a non-statutory option to purchase 15,000 shares of common stock on the date on which he or she is first elected or appointed to the Board. These options are fully vested and immediately exercisable upon the date of grant. Under the terms of a director compensation plan approved by the Board, each of our non-employee directors also receives, upon his or her initial appointment or election and upon each subsequent reelection to the Board, an option to purchase 15,000 shares that vests in full on the earlier of (i) the day prior to the date of our annual meeting of shareholders next following the date of grant, or (ii) one year from the date of grant, provided the non-employee director continues to serve as a director on the vesting date. If a non-employee director ceases to be a director for any reason other than death or disability before his or her term expires, then any outstanding unvested options issued to such Independent Director will be forfeited. Options vested as of the date of termination for any reason other than death or disability are exercisable through the date of expiration. The exercise price for each option is equal to the closing price of our common stock as reported on the Nasdaq Global Market on the date of grant. The options generally expire on the tenth anniversary of the date of grant. -24- Notwithstanding the terms of the aforementioned director compensation plan, in each of our last five fiscal years prior to 2018, the Board approved the issuance of 10,000 shares of the Company’s restricted stock to each of our non-employee directors upon his or her reelection to the Board, in lieu of the option award described in the foregoing paragraph. In 2018, the Board approved the issuance of 30,000 shares of the Company’s restricted stock to each of our non-employee directors who was reelected at our 2018 annual meeting. In addition, each non-employee director generally receives the following cash compensation for his or her service as a director: • A fee of $20,000 that accrues as of the date of appointment or election to the Board, and as of the date of each subsequent reelection; • A fee of $3,000 for the Board chair or $2,000 per director for each Board meeting attended by the director; and • A fee of $3,000 for the committee chair or $2,000 per committee member for each committee meeting attended by the director that is held on a day other than a day on which a Board meeting is held. P r o x y All directors are reimbursed for reasonable travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred in attending meetings of the Board. -25- y x o r P INFORMATION ABOUT MICROVISION COMMON STOCK OWNERSHIP Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management The following table shows as of March 29, 2019, the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned by our directors and nominees, the named executive officers, and all directors and executive officers as a group and each person known by us to own beneficially more than 5% of our outstanding common stock. Name of Beneficial Owner Number of Shares (1) Percent of Common Stock (2) Perry M. Mulligan(3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Stephen P. Holt(4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Sumit Sharma(5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Simon Biddiscombe(6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Robert P. Carlile(6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Yalon S. Farhi(6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Slade Gorton(7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Bernee D.L. Strom(6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Brian Turner(7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Thomas M. Walker(8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AWM Investment Company, Inc.(9) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . All executive officers and directors as a group (11 persons)(10) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 199,807 234,346 105,000 30,000 70,000 70,000 199,432 60,000 127,213 262,061 8,157,718 1,558,776 * * * * * * * * * * 8.0% 1.5% Less than 1% of the outstanding shares of common stock. * (1) Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock subject to options or warrants that are currently exercisable or convertible or may be exercised or converted within sixty days are deemed to be outstanding and to be beneficially owned by the person holding these options or warrants for the purpose of computing the number of shares beneficially owned and the percentage of ownership of the person holding these securities, but are not outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person or entity. Subject to community property laws where applicable, and except as otherwise noted, we believe that each shareholder named in this table has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated as beneficially owned thereby. (2) Percentage of common stock is based on 102,104,593 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 29, 2019. Includes 51,875 shares issuable upon exercise of options. Includes 225,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options. Includes 105,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options. Includes 30,000 shares issuable upon exercise of options. Includes 20,625 shares issuable upon exercise of options. Includes 169,222 shares issuable upon exercise of options. (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) Based solely on information set forth in a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 13, 2019. The business address of AWM Investment Company, Inc. is c/o Special Situations Funds, 527 Madison Avenue, Suite 2600, New York, NY 10022. (10) Includes 896,277 shares issuable upon exercise of options. -26- P r o x y CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE Under the Code of Conduct adopted by us, officers, directors and employees must avoid even the appearance of a conflict of interest. Under the Code of Ethics for MicroVision Executives we have adopted, all of our executive officers must report any material transaction or relationship that reasonably could be expected to give rise to a conflict of interest. We also review questionnaires completed by all directors and executive officers for potential “related-person transactions” between us and related persons. The Board’s Audit Committee is responsible for review, approval, or ratification of related-person transactions. The Audit Committee determines whether the related person has a material interest in a transaction and may approve, ratify, rescind, or take other action with respect to the transaction in its discretion. AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT Review of the Company’s Audited Financial Statements The Audit Committee serves as the representative of the Board for general oversight of the Company’s financial accounting and reporting, systems of internal control, audit process, and monitoring compliance with laws and regulations and standards of business conduct. Management has responsibility for preparing the Company’s financial statements, as well as for the Company’s financial reporting process. Moss Adams LLP, acting as an independent registered public accounting firm, is responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of the Company’s audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles. The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 with the Company’s management, and management represented to the Audit Committee that the Company’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. The Audit Committee has discussed with Moss Adams LLP, the Company’s independent auditors for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, the matters required to be discussed by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) AS 1301, Communications with Audit Committees. The Audit Committee received from Moss Adams LLP the written disclosures required by Rule 3526 of the PCAOB (Communication with Audit Committee Concerning Independence) and discussed with the firm its independence. Based on the review and discussions noted above, and subject to the limitations on the role and responsibilities of the Audit Committee referred to in the Charter of the Audit Committee, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board that the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 for filing with the SEC. This report of the Audit Committee shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference by any general statement incorporating by reference this Proxy Statement into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, except to the extent that the Company specifically incorporates this information by reference. Audit Committee Robert P. Carlile, Chairman Brian Turner Thomas M. Walker -27- INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM Accountant Fees and Services Our independent auditors, Moss Adams LLP, billed the following fees to us for audit and other services for 2018 and 2017, respectively: Audit Fees The aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by Moss Adams LLP for the audit of our annual financial statements and the review of the financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q were $351,870 for 2018 and $350,946 for 2017. y x o r P Audit Related Fees Audit related fees include the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by Moss Adams LLP in connection with the audit of the Company’s 401(k) plan. Fees for audit related services totaled $21,000 in 2018 and $14,815 in 2017. Tax Fees Tax fees include the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by Moss Adams LLP in connection with federal, state and foreign tax compliance and tax advice. Fees for tax services totaled $15,500 in 2018 and $15,313 in 2017. All Other Fees Fees for all other services not described above include fees for subscriptions to online accounting research tools. Fees for these services totaled $5,857 and $2,864 billed by Moss Adams LLP for 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Audit Committee has considered whether the provision of services under the heading “All Other Fees” is compatible with maintaining the accountants’ independence and has determined that it is consistent with such independence. Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditor The Audit Committee pre-approves all audit services and all permitted non-audit services by the independent auditors. The Audit Committee has delegated the authority to take such action between meetings to the Audit Committee chairman, who reports the decisions made to the full Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. The Audit Committee evaluates whether our use of the independent auditors for permitted non-audit services is compatible with maintaining the independence of the independent auditors. The Audit Committee’s policies prohibit us from engaging the independent auditors to provide any services relating to bookkeeping or other services related to accounting records or financial statements, financial information systems design and implementation, appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions or contribution-in-kind reports, actuarial services, or internal audit outsourcing services unless it is reasonable to conclude that the results of these services will not be subject to audit procedures. The Audit Committee’s policies completely prohibit us from engaging the independent auditors to provide any services relating to any management function, expert services not related to the audit, legal services, broker-dealer, investment adviser, or investment banking services or human resource consulting. -28- INFORMATION ABOUT SHAREHOLDER PROPOSALS In order for a shareholder proposal to be considered for inclusion in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting, our shareholders must adhere to the following procedures as prescribed in Rule 14a-8 under the Exchange Act (“Rule 14a-8”). Under Rule 14a-8, a shareholder who intends to present a proposal at the 2020 annual meeting of shareholders and who wishes the proposal to be included in the proxy materials for that meeting must submit the proposal in writing to us so that it is received by our Corporate Secretary no later than December 11, 2019. Please refer to Rule 14a-8 for the requirements that apply to these proposals. Any proposals received after this date will be considered untimely under Rule 14a-8. Written proposals may be mailed in care of our Corporate Secretary, MicroVision, Inc., 6244 185th Avenue NE, Suite 100, Redmond, Washington 98052. In addition, a shareholder may nominate a director or present any other proposal at the 2020 annual meeting of shareholders by complying with the requirements set forth in Section 1.11 and Section 1.12 of our bylaws. You may propose candidates for consideration by the Nominating Committee for nomination as directors by writing to us. In order to nominate a director for election at next year’s annual meeting of shareholders, you must comply with the director recommendation procedures described on pages 9 and 10 of this Proxy Statement. To be timely, a stockholder’s notice must be delivered to or mailed by first class United States mail, postage prepaid, and received by our Corporate Secretary at MicroVision, Inc., 6244 185th Avenue NE, Suite 100, Redmond, Washington 98052 not less than 60 calendar days nor more than 90 calendar days prior to the annual meeting of stockholders. If less than sixty 60 days’ notice or prior public disclosure of the date of the annual meeting is given or made to our stockholders, then for the notice by the stockholder to be timely it must be received not later than the close of business on the tenth business day following the date on which the notice of the meeting was mailed or such public disclosure was made, whichever occurs first. We reserve the right to reject, rule out of order, or take other appropriate action with respect to any proposal that does not comply with these and other applicable requirements. Our bylaws describe the requirements for submitting proposals at the Annual Meeting. If you wish to obtain a free copy of the Company’s bylaws, please contact Investor Relations, MicroVision, Inc., 6244 185thAvenue NE, Suite 100, Redmond, Washington 98052. P r o x y -29- ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Annual Report The Company’s Annual Report for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 was first made available to the shareholders of the Company with this Proxy Statement on or about April 9, 2019. The Annual Report is not to be treated as part of the proxy solicitation material or as having been incorporated by reference herein. Incorporation by Reference y x o r P To the extent that this Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference into any other filing by the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the section of this Proxy Statement entitled “Audit Committee Report” will not be deemed incorporated, unless otherwise specifically provided in such filing. A copy of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, as filed with the SEC, may be obtained by shareholders without charge by written or oral request to Investor Relations, MicroVision, Inc., 6244 185th Avenue NE, Suite 100, Redmond, Washington 98052, telephone (425) 882-6629, or may be accessed on the Internet at www.sec.gov. Householding Only one copy of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials is being delivered to shareholders residing at the same address, unless such shareholders have notified the Company of their desire to receive multiple copies. The Company will promptly deliver, upon oral or written request, a separate copy of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials to any shareholder residing at an address to which only one copy was mailed. Requests for additional copies should be directed to Investor Relations. Shareholders residing at the same address and currently receiving only one copy of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials may contact Investor Relations to request multiple copies of this Proxy Statement in the future. Shareholders residing at the same address and currently receiving multiple copies of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials may contact Investor Relations to request that only a single copy of the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials be mailed in the future. Contact Investor Relations by phone at (425) 882-6629, by fax at (425) 867-9992, by mail to Investor Relations, MicroVision, Inc., 6244 185th Avenue NE, Suite 100, Redmond, Washington 98052, or by e-mail to ir@microvision.com. Voting by Telephone or the Internet Provision has been made for you to vote your shares of common stock by telephone or via the Internet. You may also vote your shares by mail. Please see the proxy card or voting instruction form accompanying this Proxy Statement for specific instructions on how to cast your vote by any of these methods. Votes submitted by telephone or via the Internet must be received by 8:59 p.m., Seattle, Washington time, on May 21, 2019. Submitting your vote by telephone or via the Internet will not affect your right to vote in person should you decide to attend the Annual Meeting. The telephone and Internet voting procedures are designed to authenticate shareholders’ identities, to allow shareholders to give their voting instructions and to confirm that shareholders’ instructions have been recorded properly. The Company has been advised that the Internet voting procedures that have been made available to you are consistent with the requirements of applicable law. Shareholders voting via the Internet should understand that there may be costs associated with electronic access, such as usage charges from Internet access providers and telephone companies, which must be borne by the shareholder. -30- Annual Report A n n u a l R e p o r t t r o p e R l a u n n A UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K (Mark one) [X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from __________ to __________ Commission File Number: 001-34170 MicroVision, Inc. (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) 91-1600822 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) 6244 185th Avenue NE, Suite 100 Redmond, Washington 98052 (Address of Principal Executive Offices, including Zip Code) (425) 936-6847 (Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of class Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share Name of exchange on which registered The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes (cid:134)(cid:3)No (cid:95) Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes (cid:134) No (cid:95) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes (cid:95) No (cid:134) 1 A n n u a l R e p o r t Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes (cid:95) No (cid:134) Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. (cid:95) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer (cid:134) Non-accelerated filer (cid:134) Accelerated filer Smaller reporting company Emerging growth company (cid:95) (cid:95) (cid:134) If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. (cid:134) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes (cid:134) No (cid:95) The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 29, 2018 was approximately $104.2 million (based upon the closing price of $1.12 per share for the registrant’s common stock as reported by the Nasdaq Global Market on that date). The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of March 1, 2019 was 102,105,000. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Portions of the registrant's definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with the registrant's 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders (the "2019 Proxy Statement") are incorporated herein by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K to the extent stated herein. t r o p e R l a u n n A 2 MICROVISION, INC. ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS Part I. Item 1. Business Item 1A. Risk Factors Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments Item 2. Properties Item 3. Legal Proceedings Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures Item 4A. Executive Officers of the Registrant Part II. Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities Item 6. Selected Financial Data Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure Item 9A. Controls and Procedures Item 9B. Other Information Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance Item 11. Executive Compensation Part III. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules Item 16. Form 10-K Summary Part IV. 3 Page 5 10 17 17 17 17 17 18 18 18 25 27 48 48 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 53 A n n u a l R e p o r t Signatures 54 t r o p e R l a u n n A 4 Preliminary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements PART I. This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements, within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and is subject to the safe harbor created by those sections. Such statements may include, but are not limited to, projections of revenues, income or loss, capital expenditures, plans for product development and cooperative arrangements, technology development by third parties, future operations, financing needs or plans of MicroVision, Inc. (“we,” “our,” or “us”), as well as assumptions relating to the foregoing. The words “anticipate,” “could,” ”would,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “goal,” “may,” “plan,” “project,” “will,” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in our forward-looking statements include risk factors identified below in Item 1A. ITEM 1. BUSINESS Overview MicroVision, Inc. is a pioneer in laser beam scanning (LBS) technology that we market under our brand name PicoP®. We have developed our proprietary scanning technology that can be used in products for interactive projection, consumer LiDAR, automotive LiDAR, and augmented and mixed reality. Our PicoP® scanning technology is based on our patented expertise in systems that include micro-electrical mechanical systems (MEMS), laser diodes, opto- mechanics, and electronics and how those elements are packaged into a small form factor, low power scanning engine that can display, interact and sense, depending on the needs of the application. These systems utilize edge computing and machine intelligence as part of the solutions. Our strategy includes selling LBS engines to original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) and original design manufacturers (ODMs). We plan to offer scanning engines to support a wide array of applications: an interactive scanning engine for smart home speakers and other Internet of Things (IoT) products, a light detection and ranging (LiDAR) engine for consumer electronic applications, and solutions for augmented and mixed reality devices. We also are developing LiDAR for automotive collision avoidance systems. In addition to selling engines, we have licensed our patented PicoP® scanning technology to other companies for incorporation into their scanning engines for projection. We sell our customers key components needed to produce their laser scanning engines and/or license our technology in exchange for a royalty fee or margin for each scanning engine they sell. Companies to whom we license our PicoP® scanning technology are typically OEMs or ODMs who are in the business of making components or products ready for sale to end users. To date, we have primarily focused on the consumer electronics market, however, we believe that our LBS technology could support multiple applications and markets including automotive, medical, and industrial. While we are optimistic about our technology and the potential for future revenues, we have incurred substantial losses since inception and we expect to incur a significant loss during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2019. MicroVision, Inc. was founded in 1993 as a Washington corporation and reincorporated in 2003 under the laws of the State of Delaware. Our headquarters is located at 6244 185th Avenue NE, Suite 100, Redmond, Washington 98052, and our telephone number is (425) 936-6847. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports are available free-of-charge from the investor page of our website, accessible at www.microvision.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Copies of these filings may also be obtained by visiting the SEC’s website, www.sec.gov, which contains current, quarterly and annual reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically. A n n u a l R e p o r t 5 Technology Our patented PicoP® scanning technology combines a MEMS scanning mirror, laser diode light sources, electronics, and optics that are controlled using our proprietary system control algorithms along with edge computing and machine learning in some systems. The bi-directional MEMS scanning mirror is a key component of our technology system and is one of our core competencies. Our MEMS design is a silicon device with a one-millimeter mirror at the center. This mirror is connected to small flexures that allow it to oscillate vertically and horizontally to generate an image pixel-by- pixel for use in sensing and display. Scanning engines with our technology can operate in three modes: display only, display and sensing combined, and sensing only. For applications that include a projected display, our PicoP® scanning technology creates a brilliant, full color, high-contrast, uniform image over the entire field-of-view from a small and thin engine with low power consumption. For 3D LiDAR scanning applications, our engine is small with high resolution, low power and low latency which are features that are important for such applications. We believe that our proprietary technology offers significant advantages over traditional display and 3D LiDAR sensing systems. Depending on the specific product application, these advantages may include: (cid:120) Ability to perform projection and three-dimensional sensing and image capture from a single device; (cid:120) Leveraging our custom MEMS and application-specific integrated circuits (ASICs) components across multiple engine types for economies of scale; Low power requirements to enable battery operated devices and applications; (cid:120) Focus-free operation; (cid:120) HD resolution; (cid:120) (cid:120) Small and thin engine size; (cid:120) High-brightness, high-dynamic range, and brightness uniformity; (cid:120) Rich, saturated color reproduction; (cid:120) Short throw projection with multi-mode operation for table top and wall mode; (cid:120) (cid:120) Dynamic, programmable resolution and frame rate 3D scanning; and (cid:120) Efficiency of edge computing and machine learning integrated within our solution. 3D LiDAR sensing as a touch interface or point cloud; Business Strategy t r o p e R l a u n n A Our business strategy is to commercialize our PicoP® scanning technology by enabling OEMs and ODMs to produce end-user products via three go-to-market paths: (cid:120) Design and sell LBS engines directly to OEMs and ODMs to incorporate inside their products; (cid:120) License our LBS technology and sell key components to OEMs and ODMs to create their own scanning engines; and (cid:120) License LBS technology to OEMs and ODMs who developed their own key components or subsystems. By providing these options, we permit OEMs and ODMs to integrate and embed our technology across a broad range of interactive and non-interactive display and 3D LiDAR sensing product applications in the way that best matches their technical capabilities and timelines for bringing their products to market. The key elements of our business strategy include the following: (cid:120) Develop LBS modules that enable our customers to make products that end users find indispensable; (cid:120) Continue to improve the performance of our PicoP® scanning technology system by advancing the key application attributes such as higher brightness for displays, lower power, smaller size, and greater accuracy and longer distances for 3D sensing; (cid:120) Develop machine learning algorithms that allow our 3D LiDAR sensing products to respond faster and more accurately to users and/or objects in the environment; (cid:120) Sell LBS engines to OEMs and ODMs; (cid:120) Provide engineering services to develop LBS engines for OEMs and ODMs who need custom engines; (cid:120) Develop a supply chain able to supply customers with high quality LBS engines in quantities to support the consumer electronics market; 6 (cid:120) Supply key scanning engine components for products being developed by OEMs and ODMs who license our PicoP® scanning technology and/or license rights to OEMs and ODMs to produce such components; (cid:120) Partner with other companies that are interested in growing the LBS market to cooperatively promote our solutions and develop solutions for future products and capabilities where appropriate; and (cid:120) Maintain a position of LBS leadership with our intellectual property around our PicoP® scanning technology. Markets for Our Technology Our PicoP® scanning technology system strategy is focused on addressing the following market segments: Interactive and non-interactive pico projection; 3D LiDAR sensing for consumer electronics, automotive collision avoidance; and (cid:120) (cid:120) (cid:120) Augmented/Virtual Reality (AR/VR). We see interactive and non-interactive pico projection, 3D LiDAR sensing, and AR/VR as the most promising applications for our technology in the near to mid-term. We have concentrated on pico projection over the past several years and we announced plans for other engine solutions for interactive pico projection and 3D LiDAR sensing. We also believe AR and VR eyewear displays can also benefit from our technology, and we are actively exploring these opportunities. In interactive projection, our goal is to enable an interactive screen experience produced on demand by a small system for AI connected devices such as smart speakers. The solution would allow users to perform micro transactions by augmenting the capabilities of these voice controlled devices, making transactions more intuitive and easier to perform. By working on a variety of surfaces in conjunction with smart devices, these solutions provide the functionality of display screens while reducing the size requirements of display screens in the home. We have developed 3D LiDAR sensing capabilities in our LBS engine. This allows the LBS engine to sense what is in front of it and where that object is in space. If we project an image on a surface and use our 3D LiDAR sensing capability concurrently, we are able to create an LBS engine where a user can touch the projected image or interact with the image using gestures and it will react much like a touchscreen. We call this interactive display. We believe that interactive display can enable a whole new category of smart IoT products. Additionally, we are working to bring to market 3D LiDAR sensors. The consumer 3D LiDAR sensor we are developing is a small sensor able to capture information about what is in front of the sensor with high accuracy and high fidelity. We see applications for this sensor in smart home and smart home security products and in commercial space management. We are also working on LiDAR modules for automotive collision avoidance systems. Another application area for our PicoP® scanning technology that we are focused on is eyewear displays, also known as AR and VR. We have a long history with this application, and we believe the eyewear ecosystem has progressed to a point where we see future growth opportunities in this market. Products and Services In 2018, our revenue was derived from development contracts and from license and royalty fees for PicoP® scanning technology. In May 2018, we signed a five-year license agreement with a customer granting them an exclusive license to our LBS technology for display-only applications. The license represents functional intellectual property which derives a substantial portion of its utility from its significant standalone functionality. The intellectual property is not expected to substantially change during the license period, nor are we contractually or practically required to use updated intellectual property during the license life. During the year ended December 31, 2018 we completed the performance obligations required by the contract. As a result, we recognized $10.0 million in license revenue for the year ended December 31, 2018. In April 2017, we signed a contract with a major technology company to develop an LBS display system. Under this agreement, we would develop a new generation of MEMS, ASIC and related firmware for a high resolution, LBS- based product that the technology company is planning to produce. We would receive up to $24.6 million, including $14.6 million in fees for development contingent on completion of milestones and an upfront payment of $10.0 million, which payment has been received. The original contract was for $14.0 million in fees for development, but the 7 A n n u a l R e p o r t customer added $632,000 in additional work to total $14.6 million. As of December 31, 2018, we have received $10.7 million of the fees for development work. The remaining development fees would be paid contingent on completion of milestones through the second quarter of 2019. Upon successful completion of the development program, if the company decides to manufacture the product with the MicroVision display components, the $10.0 million upfront payment would be applied as a discount to future component purchases from us. If the contract is terminated by the technology company for our failure to meet milestones, the $10.0 million upfront payment is subject to repayment. As the contract is expected to be completed in Q2 2019, we believe the risk of repayment is low. In 2017, we introduced a small form factor, high definition display engine for applications where form factor and flexibility of product design are required. In March 2017, we received a $6.7 million order for our small form factor display engine from Ragentek Communication Technology Co., Limited (Ragentek), an Asian electronics device manufacturer. Initial shipments of engines to Ragentek began at the end of June 2017 to embed in its smartphone product. Ragentek launched their smartphone during the third quarter of 2017. We had planned to recognize $4.3 million of product revenue during the fourth quarter of 2017 by completing the remainder of the order. The customer, however, requested a deferment in taking receipt of the remainder of the engines until 2018. In 2018 the customer did not take delivery of the remaining engines. We are pursuing our legal rights to enforce the contract. We also plan to introduce an interactive display engine that integrates display and 3D LiDAR sensing to allow the user to interact with projected images and a consumer grade LiDAR engine for consumer electronics (smart home and smart home security) applications. The key components and technology we offer for inclusion in an LBS engine are our MEMS, ASICs, and software. Our licensees can purchase none, some, or all of the key components and license the technology we offer depending on their capability and desire to manufacture them and the terms of the licensing agreement. Research and Development We believe our research and development efforts have earned us a leadership position in the field of LBS technology and applications as applied to consumer electronics, automotive and other markets. Our ability to attract customers and grow revenue will depend on our ability to maintain our LBS technology leadership, to continually improve performance, reduce costs, reduce the size of component parts and scanning engines, and to increase the number of applications and products enabled by our PicoP® scanning technology. Our research and development team is located in Redmond, Washington and as of December 31, 2018, was comprised of 85 engineering and technical staff in optics, software engineering, electrical engineering, product engineering, and MEMS design. Sales and Marketing t r o p e R l a u n n A Our sales and marketing approach is account based, business-to-business targeting of OEMs and ODMs. We license our PicoP® scanning technology and sell components used in the production of scanning engines to our licensees and sell scanning engines to our customers. We also engage end product manufacturers and retailers in our target markets to educate them about product opportunities based on our PicoP® scanning technology. We currently have sales and business development representatives based in the United States and Asia, focused on business development in the Americas, Europe and Asia. Our sales and business development representatives are supported by a technical sales engineering team that assists customers during the “design win” and “design in” cycles. The technical sales engineering team operates from Redmond, Washington, and Japan. Our marketing team is located in Redmond, Washington. We engage potential customers directly, participate in trade shows, maintain a website, and cooperate on co-marketing activities with key partners. Manufacturing Our products include scanning engines as well as components that are integral to a scanning engine. Our scanning engine products are manufactured by a contract manufacturer based on our proprietary design and incorporate our PicoP® scanning technology and include MEMS and ASICs that are produced to order by semiconductor foundries. 8 Our manufacturing is not currently subject to seasonal variations as our shipments have been relatively small and are in the early stages of product introduction. In the future, depending on our customers’ product mix, we may be affected by seasonal fluctuations which could affect working capital demands. We provide forecasts that allow our contract manufacturers to stock component parts and other materials and plan capacity. Our contract manufacturers procure raw materials in volumes consistent with our forecasts, manufacture and/or assemble the products and perform tests according to our specifications. Products are shipped to our customers or shipped to our Redmond, Washington headquarters to be inventoried as finished goods. We procure some specific components and either sell them or consign them to our contract manufacturers. We hold some inventories of these components. Our contract manufacturers procure additional raw materials we do not own until the finished goods are completed by our contract manufacturer. Title to the products transfers from our contract manufacturers to us and then to our customers upon shipment from the manufacturer. If raw materials are unused, or the products are not sold within specified periods of time, we may incur carrying charges or obsolete material charges for component parts that our contract manufacturers purchased to build products to meet our forecasts or customer orders. Many of the raw materials used in our components are standard to the consumer electronics industry. Our MEMS, MEMS die, and ASICs are currently manufactured to our specifications by separate single-source suppliers. Human Factors, Ergonomics and Safety We work with third party independent experts in the field of laser safety to assist in meeting safety specifications. In addition, we monitor developments in the area of permissible laser exposure limits as established by International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) and others. Independent experts have concluded that laser exposure to the eye resulting from use of LBS devices under normal operating conditions would be below the calculated maximum permissible exposure level set by the IEC. Competitive Conditions The consumer display and 3D sensing industries are highly competitive. Potential products incorporating our PicoP® scanning technology, including any LBS engines we develop, will compete with manufacturers of established technologies, such as flat panel display devices, as well as companies developing new display and 3D LiDAR sensing technologies. Our competitors include companies such as Texas Instruments, Intel, Syndiant, Velodyne, Bosch, Quanergy, Innoluce, Opus, Mirrorcle, Maradin, Himax, Pioneer, Sony (LCOS) and others, some of which have much greater financial, technical and other resources than us. Many of our competitors are currently developing alternative miniature display and 3D LiDAR sensing technologies. Our competitors may succeed in developing innovative technologies and products that could render our technology or our proposed products commercially infeasible or technologically obsolete. The consumer display and 3D sensing industries have been characterized by rapid and significant technological advances. Our PicoP® scanning technology system and potential products may not be competitive with such advances, and we may not have sufficient funds to invest in new technologies, products or processes. Although we believe our technology system and proposed products could deliver images of a substantially higher performance from a smaller form factor device than those of commercially available LCOS and DLP based display products, LCD and LCOS interactive panels or solid state LiDAR and CMOS sensing solutions, manufacturers of competing technologies may develop improvements to their technology that could reduce or eliminate the anticipated advantages of our proposed products. 3D sensing is a new market and we believe we are developing products that will have cost and performance benefits over what competitors may offer. However, manufacturers of competing technologies may develop improvements to the size, performance, and cost of their modules, that could reduce or eliminate the anticipated advantages of our proposed products. A n n u a l R e p o r t Intellectual Property and Proprietary Rights We create intellectual property from three sources: internal research and development activities, technology acquisitions, and performance on development contracts. The inventions covered by our patent applications generally relate to systems controls in our PicoP® scanning technology, component miniaturization, power reduction, feature enhancements, specific implementation of various system components, and design elements to facilitate mass 9 production. Protecting these key-enabling technologies and components is a fundamental aspect of our strategy to penetrate diverse markets with unique products. As such, we intend to continue to develop our portfolio of proprietary and patented LBS technologies at the system, component, and process levels. We believe our extensive patent portfolio is the largest, broadest, and earliest filed LBS technology portfolio and includes applications such as augmented reality, range finding, portable media devices, image capture, and projection applications. We have over 500 issued patents, pending patents and licensed patents worldwide. Since our inception in 1993, we have acquired, either under license agreements or portfolio purchases, patents that grant us exclusive rights to various LBS technologies. From time to time some of these patents may expire, or we may decide to terminate a license agreement for a variety of reasons to better utilize resources expended to maintain intellectual property. Our ability to compete effectively in the consumer display and 3D sensing markets may depend, in part, on our ability and the ability of our licensors to maintain the proprietary nature of these technologies. We also rely on unpatented proprietary technology. To protect our rights in these areas, we require all employees, and where appropriate, contractors, consultants, advisors and collaborators, to enter into confidentiality and non-compete agreements. There can be no assurance, however, that these agreements will provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information in the event of any unauthorized use, misappropriation or disclosure of such trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information. We have registered the name “PicoP®” and “MicroVision®” with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. Employees As of March 1, 2019, we had 107 full-time employees. None of our employees are represented by a labor union. ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS You should carefully consider the risks described below together with the other information set forth in this report, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and future results. The risks described below are not the only risks facing our company. Risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and operating results. Risk Factors Related to Our Business and Industry We have a history of operating losses and expect to incur significant losses in the future. We have had substantial losses since our inception. We cannot assure you that we will ever become or remain profitable. (cid:120) As of December 31, 2018, we had an accumulated deficit of $546.1 million. (cid:120) We incurred consolidated net losses of $493.4 million from inception through 2016, $25.5 million in 2017, and $27.3 million in 2018. The likelihood of our success must be considered in light of the expenses, difficulties and delays frequently encountered by companies formed to develop and commercialize new technologies. In particular, our operations to date have focused primarily on research and development of our PicoP® scanning technology system and development of demonstration units. We are unable to accurately estimate future revenues and operating expenses based upon historical performance. We cannot be certain that we will succeed in obtaining additional development revenue or commercializing our technology or products. In light of these factors, we expect to continue to incur significant losses and negative cash flow at least through 2019 and likely thereafter. We cannot be certain that we will achieve positive cash flow at any time in the future. t r o p e R l a u n n A 10 We will require additional capital to fund our operations and to implement our business plan. If we do not obtain additional capital, we may be required to curtail our operations substantially. Raising additional capital may dilute the value of current shareholders' shares. Based on our current operating plan that includes expected proceeds from a development contract signed in April 2017 with a major technology company, we anticipate that we have sufficient cash and cash equivalents to fund our operations through June 2019. Our receipt of proceeds under our April 2017 development contract is subject to our completion of certain milestones, and we can provide no assurance that such milestones will be completed. We will require additional capital to fund our operating plan past that time. We plan to obtain additional capital through the issuance of equity or debt securities, product sales and/or licensing activities. We are introducing new technology and products into an emerging market which creates significant uncertainty about our ability to accurately project revenue, costs and cash flows. Our capital requirements will depend on many factors, including, but not limited to, the commercial success of our LBS engines, the rate at which OEMs and ODMs introduce products incorporating our PicoP® scanning technology and the market acceptance and competitive position of such products. If revenues are less than we anticipate, if we fail to meet milestones for future payments or have to repay amounts already received under our April 2017 development contract, if the mix of revenues and the associated margins varies from anticipated amounts or if expenses exceed the amounts budgeted, we may require additional capital earlier than expected to fund our operations. In addition, our operating plan provides for the development of strategic relationships with suppliers of components, products and systems, and equipment manufacturers that may require additional investments by us. Additional capital may not be available to us or, if available, may not be available on terms acceptable to us or on a timely basis. Raising additional capital may involve issuing securities with rights and preferences that are senior to our common stock and may dilute the value of our current shareholders' shares. If adequate capital resources are not available on a timely basis, we may consider limiting our operations substantially and we may be unable to continue as a going concern. This limitation of operations could include reducing investments in our production capacities or research and development projects, staff, operating costs, and capital expenditures which could jeopardize our ability to achieve our business goals or satisfy our customer requirements. Qualifying a new or alternative contract manufacturer or foundry for our products could cause us to experience delays that result in lost revenues and damaged customer relationships. We rely on single or limited-source suppliers to manufacture our products. Establishing a relationship with a new or alternative contract manufacturer(s) or foundry is a time-consuming process, as our unique technology may require significant manufacturing process adaptation to achieve full manufacturing capacity. Accordingly, we may be unable to establish a relationship with new or alternative contract manufacturers in the short-term, or at all, at prices or on other terms that are acceptable to us. Changes in our supply chain may result in increased cost and delay and may subject us to risks and uncertainties regarding, but not limited to, product warranty, product liability and quality control standards. The loss of any single or limited-source supplier, the failure of any of these suppliers to perform as expected or the disruption in the supply chain of components from these suppliers could cause significant delays in product deliveries, which may result in lost revenues and damaged customer relationships. To the extent that we are not able to establish a relationship with a new or alternative contract manufacturer(s) or foundry in a timely manner, we may be unable to meet contract or production milestones, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to secure significant third party manufacturing resources. Our success will depend, in part, on our ability to provide our components and future products in commercial quantities at competitive prices and on schedule. Accordingly, we will be required to obtain access, through business partners or contract manufacturers, to manufacturing capacity and processes for the commercial production of our expected future products. Our foreign contract manufacturers could experience severe financial difficulties or other disruptions in their business, and such continued supply could be significantly reduced or terminated. In addition, we cannot be certain that we will successfully obtain access to needed manufacturing resources concurrent with a significant increase in our planned production levels. Future manufacturing limitations of our suppliers could constrain the number of products that we are able to develop and produce. 11 A n n u a l R e p o r t We are dependent on third parties in order to develop, manufacture, sell and market products incorporating our PicoP® scanning technology, scanning engines, and the scanning engine components. Our business strategy for commercializing our technology in products incorporating PicoP® scanning technology includes entering into development, manufacturing, licensing, sales and marketing arrangements with OEMs, ODMs and other third parties. These arrangements reduce our level of control over production and distribution and may subject us to risks and uncertainties regarding, but not limited to, product warranty, product liability and quality control standards. We cannot be certain that we will be able to negotiate arrangements on acceptable terms, if at all, or that these arrangements will be successful in yielding commercially viable products. If we cannot establish these arrangements, we would require additional capital to undertake such activities on our own and would require extensive manufacturing, sales and marketing expertise that we do not currently possess and that may be difficult to obtain. In addition, we could encounter significant delays in introducing our PicoP® scanning technology or find that the development, manufacture or sale of products incorporating our technology would not be feasible. To the extent that we enter into development, manufacturing, licensing, sales and marketing or other arrangements, our revenues will depend upon the performance of third parties. We cannot be certain that any such arrangements will be successful. We cannot be certain that our technology system or products incorporating our PicoP® scanning technology will achieve market acceptance. If our technology system or products incorporating our technology do not achieve market acceptance, our revenues may not grow. Our success will depend in part on customer acceptance of our PicoP® scanning technology. Our technology may not be accepted by manufacturers who use display and 3D sensing technologies in their products, by systems integrators, OEMs, and ODMs who incorporate the scanning engine components into their products or by end users of these products. To be accepted, our PicoP® scanning technology must meet the expectations of our current and potential customers in the consumer electronics, automotive, and other markets. If our technology system or products incorporating our PicoP® scanning technology do not achieve market acceptance, we may not be able to continue to develop our technology. Future products incorporating our PicoP® scanning technology and scanning engines are dependent on advances in technology by other companies. Our PicoP® scanning technology will continue to rely on technologies, such as laser diode light sources and other components that are developed and produced by other companies. The commercial success of certain future products incorporating our PicoP® scanning technology will depend, in part, on advances in these and other technologies by other companies. We may, from time to time, contract with and support companies developing key technologies in order to accelerate the development of them for our or our customers' specific uses. There are no guarantees that such activities will result in useful technologies or products that will be profitable. We are dependent on a small number of customers for our revenue. Our quarterly performance may vary substantially and this variance, as well as general market conditions, may cause our stock price to fluctuate greatly and potentially expose us to litigation. In 2018, one customer accounted for $10.0 million in revenue, representing 57% of our total revenue. A second customer accounted for $7.4 million in revenue, representing 42% of our total revenue. In 2017, one customer accounted for $5.8 million in revenue, representing 60% of our total revenue, and a second customer accounted for $2.3 million in revenue, representing 24% of our total revenue. Our customers take time to obtain, and the loss of a significant customer could negatively affect our revenue. Our quarterly operating results may vary significantly based upon: t r o p e R l a u n n A (cid:120) Market acceptance of products incorporating our PicoP® scanning technology; (cid:120) Changes in evaluations and recommendations by any securities analysts following our stock or our industry generally; (cid:120) Announcements by other companies in our industry; (cid:120) Changes in business or regulatory conditions; (cid:120) Announcements or implementation by our competitors of technological innovations or new products; (cid:120) The status of particular development programs and the timing of performance under specific development agreements; 12 (cid:120) Economic and stock market conditions; or (cid:120) Other factors unrelated to our company or industry. In one or more future quarters, our results of operations may fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors and the trading price of our common stock may decline as a consequence. In addition, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company's securities, shareholders often have instituted securities class action litigation against that company. If we become involved in a class action suit, it could divert the attention of management and, if adversely determined, could require us to pay substantial damages. We or our customers may fail to perform under open orders or agreements, which could adversely affect our operating results and cash flows. Our backlog under open orders and agreements totaled $2.5 million as of December 31, 2018. We or our customers may be unable to meet the performance requirements and obligations under open orders or agreements, including performance specifications, milestones or delivery dates, required by such purchase orders or agreements. Furthermore, our customers may be unable or unwilling to perform their obligations thereunder on a timely basis, or at all if, among other reasons, our products and technologies do not achieve market acceptance, our customers' products and technologies do not achieve market acceptance or our customers otherwise fail to achieve their operating goals. To the extent we are unable to perform under such purchase orders or agreements or to the extent customers are unable or unwilling to perform, our operating results and cash flows could be adversely affected. We may not be able to maintain our listing on The Nasdaq Global Market and it may become more difficult to sell our stock in the public market. Our common stock is listed on The Nasdaq Global Market. To maintain our listing on this market, we must meet Nasdaq's listing maintenance standards. If we are unable to continue to meet Nasdaq's listing maintenance standards for any reason, our common stock could be delisted from The Nasdaq Global Market. If our common stock were delisted, we likely would seek to list our common stock on The Nasdaq Capital Market, the American Stock Exchange or on a regional stock exchange. Listing on such other market or exchange could reduce the liquidity of our common stock. If our common stock were not listed on The Nasdaq Capital Market or another exchange, trading of our common stock would be conducted in the Over-the-Counter (OTC) market on an electronic bulletin board established for unlisted securities or directly through market makers in our common stock. If our common stock were to trade in the OTC market, an investor would find it more difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations for the price of, the common stock. A delisting from The Nasdaq Global Market and failure to obtain listing on another market or exchange would subject our common stock to so-called penny stock rules that impose additional sales practice and market-making requirements on broker-dealers who sell or make a market in such securities. Consequently, removal from The Nasdaq Global Market and failure to obtain listing on another market or exchange could affect the ability or willingness of broker- dealers to sell or make a market in our common stock and the ability of purchasers of our common stock to sell their securities in the secondary market. On March 1, 2019, the closing price of our common stock was $1.17 per share. Our lack of financial and technical resources relative to our competitors may limit our revenues, potential profits, overall market share or value. Our products and potential products incorporating our PicoP® scanning technology will compete with established manufacturers of existing products and companies developing new technologies. Many of our competitors have substantially greater financial, technical and other resources than we have. Because of their greater resources, our competitors may develop products or technologies that may be superior to our own. The introduction of superior competing products or technologies could result in reduced revenues, lower margins or loss of market share, any of which could reduce the value of our business. We may not be able to keep up with rapid technological change and our financial results may suffer. The consumer display and 3D sensing industries have been characterized by rapidly changing technology, accelerated product obsolescence and continuously evolving industry standards. Our success will depend upon our ability to 13 A n n u a l R e p o r t further develop our PicoP® scanning technology system and to cost effectively introduce new products and features in a timely manner to meet evolving customer requirements and compete with competitors' product advances. We may not succeed in these efforts due to: (cid:120) Delays in product development; (cid:120) Lack of market acceptance for our technology or products incorporating our PicoP® scanning technology; or (cid:120) Lack of funds to invest in product research, development and marketing. The occurrence of any of the above factors could result in decreased revenues, market share and value of our business. We could face lawsuits related to our use of PicoP® scanning technology or other technologies. Defending these suits would be costly and time-consuming. An adverse outcome, in any such matter, could limit our ability to commercialize our technology or products incorporating our PicoP® scanning technology, reduce our revenues and increase our operating expenses. We are aware of several patents held by third parties that relate to certain aspects of light scanning displays and 3D sensing products. These patents could be used as a basis to challenge the validity, limit the scope or limit our ability to obtain additional or broader patent rights of our patents or patents we have licensed. A successful challenge to the validity of our patents or patents we have licensed could limit our ability to commercialize our technology or products incorporating our PicoP® scanning technology and, consequently, materially reduce our revenues. Moreover, we cannot be certain that patent holders or other third parties will not claim infringement by us with respect to current and future technology. Because U.S. patent applications are held and examined in secrecy, it is also possible that presently pending U.S. applications will eventually be issued with claims that will be infringed by our products or our technology. The defense and prosecution of a patent suit would be costly and time-consuming, even if the outcome were ultimately favorable to us. An adverse outcome in the defense of a patent suit could subject us to significant costs, require others and us to cease selling products incorporating our technology, require us to cease licensing our technology or require disputed rights to be licensed from third parties. Such licenses, if available, would increase our operating expenses. Moreover, if claims of infringement are asserted against our future co-development partners or customers, those partners or customers may seek indemnification from us for any damages or expenses they incur. If we fail to manage expansion effectively, our revenue and expenses could be adversely affected. Our ability to successfully offer products incorporating PicoP® scanning technology and implement our business plan in a rapidly evolving market requires an effective planning and management process. The growth in business and relationships with customers and other third parties has placed, and will continue to place, a significant strain on our management systems and resources. We will need to continue to improve our financial and managerial controls, reporting systems and procedures, and will need to continue to train and manage our work force. If we fail to adequately reduce and control our manufacturing, supply chain and operating costs, our business, financial condition, and operating results could be adversely affected. We incur significant costs related to procuring components and increasing our production capabilities to manufacture our products. We may experience delays, cost overruns or other unexpected costs associated with an increase in production. If we are unsuccessful in our efforts to reduce and control our manufacturing, supply chain and operating costs and keep costs aligned with the levels of revenues we generate, our business and financial condition could suffer. Our technology and products incorporating our PicoP® scanning technology may be subject to future environmental, health and safety regulations that could increase our development and production costs. Our technology and products incorporating our PicoP® scanning technology could become subject to future environmental, health and safety regulations or amendments that could negatively impact our ability to commercialize our technology and products incorporating our PicoP® scanning technology. Compliance with any such new regulations would likely increase the cost to develop and produce products incorporating our PicoP® scanning technology, and violations may result in fines, penalties or suspension of production. If we become subject to any environmental, health, or safety laws or regulations that require us to cease or significantly change our operations to comply, our business, financial condition and operating results could be adversely affected. 14 t r o p e R l a u n n A Our operating results may be adversely impacted by worldwide political and economic uncertainties and specific conditions in the markets we address. In the recent past, general worldwide economic conditions have experienced a downturn due to slower economic activity, concerns about inflation, increased energy costs, decreased consumer confidence, reduced corporate profits and capital spending, and adverse business conditions. Any continuation or worsening of the current global economic and financial conditions could materially adversely affect: (i) our ability to raise, or the cost of, needed capital, (ii) demand for our current and future products, and (iii) our ability to commercialize products. We cannot predict the timing, strength, or duration of any economic slowdown or subsequent economic recovery, worldwide, regionally or in the display industry. Because we plan to continue using foreign contract manufacturers, our operating results could be harmed by economic, political, regulatory and other factors in foreign countries. We currently use foreign contract manufacturers and plan to continue to use foreign contract manufacturers to manufacture current and future products, where appropriate. These international operations are subject to inherent risks, which may adversely affect us, including, but not limited to: (cid:120) Political and economic instability; (cid:120) High levels of inflation, historically the case in a number of countries in Asia; (cid:120) Burdens and costs of compliance with a variety of foreign laws, regulations and sanctions; (cid:120) Foreign taxes and duties; (cid:120) Changes in tariff rates or other trade, tax or monetary policies; and (cid:120) Changes or volatility in currency exchange rates and interest rates. Our contract manufacturers' facilities could be damaged or disrupted by a natural disaster or labor strike, either of which would materially affect our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. A major catastrophe, such as an earthquake, monsoon, flood or other natural disaster, labor strike, or work stoppage at our contract manufacturers' facilities, our suppliers, or our customers, could result in a prolonged interruption of our business. A disruption resulting from any one of these events could cause significant delays in product shipments and the loss of sales and customers, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows. If we are unable to obtain effective intellectual property protection for our products, processes and technology, we may be unable to compete with other companies. Intellectual property protection for our products, processes and technology is important and uncertain. If we do not obtain effective intellectual property protection for our products, processes and technology, we may be subject to increased competition. Our commercial success will depend, in part, on our ability, to maintain the proprietary nature of our PicoP® scanning technology and other key technologies by securing valid and enforceable patents and effectively maintaining unpatented technology as trade secrets. We protect our proprietary PicoP® scanning technology by seeking to obtain United States and foreign patents in our name, or licenses to third party patents, related to proprietary technology, inventions, and improvements that may be important to the development of our business. However, our patent position involves complex legal and factual questions. The standards that the United States Patent and Trademark Office and its foreign counterparts use to grant patents are not always applied predictably or uniformly and can change. Additionally, the scope of patents is subject to interpretation by courts and their validity can be subject to challenges and defenses, including challenges and defenses based on the existence of prior art. Consequently, we cannot be certain as to the extent to which we will be able to obtain patents for our new products and technology or the extent to which the patents that we already own, protect our products and technology. Reduction in scope of protection or invalidation of our licensed or owned patents, or our inability to obtain new patents, may enable other companies to develop products that compete directly with ours on the basis of the same or similar technology. We also rely on the law of trade secrets to protect unpatented know-how and technology to maintain our competitive position. We try to protect this know-how and technology by limiting access to the trade secrets to those of our employees, contractors and partners, with a need-to-know such information and by entering into confidentiality agreements with parties that have access to it, such as our employees, consultants and business partners. Any of these 15 A n n u a l R e p o r t parties could breach the agreements and disclose our trade secrets or confidential information, or our competitors might learn of the information in some other way. If any trade secret not protected by a patent were to be disclosed to or independently developed by a competitor, our competitive position could be negatively affected. We could be subject to significant product liability claims that could be time-consuming and costly, divert management attention and adversely affect our ability to obtain and maintain insurance coverage. We could be subject to product liability claims if any of the product applications are alleged to be defective or cause harmful effects. For example, because some of the scanning engines incorporating our PicoP® scanning technology could scan a low power beam of colored light into the user's eye, the testing, manufacture, marketing and sale of these products involve an inherent risk that product liability claims will be asserted against us. Additionally, any misuse of our technology or products incorporating our PicoP® scanning technology by end users or third parties that obtain access to our technology, could result in negative publicity and could harm our brand and reputation. Product liability claims or other claims related to our products or our technology, regardless of their outcome, could require us to spend significant time and money in litigation, divert management time and attention, require us to pay significant damages, harm our reputation or hinder acceptance of our products. Any successful product liability claim may prevent us from obtaining adequate product liability insurance in the future on commercially desirable or reasonable terms. An inability to obtain sufficient insurance coverage at an acceptable cost or otherwise to protect against potential product liability claims could prevent or inhibit the commercialization of our products and our PicoP® scanning technology. Our contracts and collaborative research and development agreements have long sales cycles, which makes it difficult to plan our expenses and forecast our revenues. Our contracts and collaborative research and development agreements have long sales cycles that involve numerous steps including determining the product application, exploring the technical feasibility of a proposed product, evaluating the costs of manufacturing a product or qualifying a new or alternative contract manufacturer for production. Our long sales cycle, which can last several years, makes it difficult to predict the quarter in which revenue recognition will occur. Delays in entering into contracts and collaborative research and development agreements could cause significant variability in our revenues and operating results for any particular period. Our contracts and collaborative research and development agreements may not lead to any product or any products that will be profitable. Our contracts and collaborative research and development agreements, including without limitation, those discussed in this document, are exploratory in nature and are intended to develop new types of products for new applications. Our efforts may prove unsuccessful and these relationships may not result in the development of any product or any products that will be profitable. Our operations could be adversely impacted by information technology system failures, network disruptions, or cyber security breaches. t r o p e R l a u n n A We rely on information technology systems to process, transmit, store, and protect electronic data between our employees, our customers and our suppliers. Our systems are vulnerable to damage or interruptions due to events beyond our control, including, but are not limited to, natural disasters, power loss, telecommunications failures, computer viruses, hacking, or other cyber security issues. Our system redundancy may be inadequate and our disaster recovery planning may be ineffective or insufficient to account for all eventualities. Additionally, we maintain insurance coverage to address certain aspects of cyber risks. Such insurance coverage may be insufficient to cover all losses or all claims that may arise, should such an event occur. Loss of any of our key personnel could have a negative effect on the operation of our business. Our success depends on our executive officers and other key personnel and on the ability to attract and retain qualified new personnel. Achievement of our business objectives will require substantial additional expertise in the areas of sales and marketing, research and product development and manufacturing. Competition for qualified personnel in these fields is intense, and the inability to attract and retain additional highly skilled personnel, or the loss of key personnel, could hinder our ability to compete effectively in the LBS markets and adversely affect our business strategy execution and results of operations. 16 ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS None. ITEM 2. PROPERTIES In July 2017, we entered into a 65 month facility lease amendment on 31,142 square feet of combined use office, laboratory and manufacturing space at our headquarters facility in Redmond, Washington. The lease agreement includes extension and rent escalation provisions over the term of the lease. ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS During 2018, we settled all related claims with Asia Optical relating to its previously filed complaint for arbitration for less than related reserves. We are subject to various claims and pending or threatened lawsuits in the normal course of business. We are not currently party to any other legal proceedings that we believe are reasonably possible to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES Not applicable. ITEM 4A. EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT Executive officers are appointed by our Board of Directors and hold office until their successors are elected and duly qualified. The following persons serve as executive officers of MicroVision, Inc.: Perry M. Mulligan, age 61, has served as a director of the Company since January 2010 and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since November 2017. Mr. Mulligan has over 30 years of experience in operations and supply chain management. Mr. Mulligan was formerly Senior Vice President of Operations for Emulex Corporation where he oversaw Emulex operations, including IT, facilities, supplier management, test engineering and logistics from July 2013 to June 2015. Mr. Mulligan served as Senior Vice President, Operations for QLogic from October 2007 to June 2013, where he was responsible for all aspects of the manufacturing and delivery of products to the customer in addition to overall supply chain design and manufacturing strategy. Prior to QLogic, Mr. Mulligan was at Solectron from May 2004 to September 2007, where he held the position of Senior Vice President Supply Chain Management and Chief Procurement Officer and was responsible for establishing the overall materials and supply chain strategy. Mr. Mulligan brings extensive experience and knowledge in developing and setting up worldwide manufacturing and sourcing operations and overall supply chain strategy. Mr. Mulligan has an MBA from the University of Western Ontario. Stephen P. Holt, age 56, joined MicroVision in April 2013 as Chief Financial Officer. Prior to MicroVision, from May 2007 to May 2012, he served as Chief Financial Officer of PixelOptics, where he played a lead role in bringing the company’s first electronic focusing eyewear product to market. At this venture capital-backed start-up, Mr. Holt raised capital and negotiated strategic partner agreements to license technology in addition to implementing policies and procedures to create an infrastructure capable of supporting rapid growth while maintaining a strong internal control environment. From March 2006 to April 2007, he was the Chief Financial Officer of Interstate Distributors, a trucking and transportation services company. From December 2003 to March 2006, he was the Chief Financial Officer of a group of companies consisting of Activelight, Boxlight, Cinelight and Projector Wholesale Supply. These companies were value-added resellers and distributors of audio-visual and projection equipment. Mr. Holt, a Certified Management Accountant, holds a B.S. from California State University, Chico and an M.B.A. from Santa Clara University. A n n u a l R e p o r t Sumit Sharma, age 45, was appointed Chief Operating Officer in June 2018, after serving as Vice President of Product Engineering and Operations since February 2017 and Vice President and Senior Director of Operations since September 2015. Prior to MicroVision, from April 2015 to September 2015, he was a Product Development and Operations consultant at BlueMadison Consulting. From November 2013 to March 2015, he was the Senior Director, Advanced Manufacturing Operations and Technology Development at Jawbone. From March 2011 to October 2013, he was the Head of Manufacturing Operations for project GLASS at Google. Mr. Sharma has extensive experience in optics, wearable technology, product development and qualification for automotive industry. Mr. Sharma also has 17 deep experience in global operations and developing strategic partnerships. A patent holder, Mr. Sharma received his baccalaureate degree in engineering from New Jersey Institute of Technology. David J. Westgor, age 65, was appointed Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary in November 2013, after serving as General Counsel since December 2012 and Deputy General Counsel since June 2007. Before joining MicroVision, Mr. Westgor was Senior Counsel at Medtronic Physio-Control, where he had primary responsibility for the legal affairs of its medical and informatics business units. Mr. Westgor graduated from Loyola Law School and practiced in the Los Angeles office of Pillsbury Winthrop. He moved to the Seattle area to become in-house counsel at Advanced Radio Telecom, a broadband telecommunications company. Mr. Westgor holds a B.A. from St. Olaf College and an M.F.A. degree from the Art Institute of Chicago. PART II. ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES Our common stock began trading publicly on August 27, 1996. Our common stock trades on The Nasdaq Global Market under the ticker symbol “MVIS.” We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock. We currently anticipate that we will retain all future earnings to fund the operations of our business and do not anticipate paying dividends on the common stock in the foreseeable future. As of March 1, 2019, there were approximately 119 holders of record of 102,105,000 shares of common stock outstanding. As many of our shares of common stock are held by brokerages and institutions on behalf of shareholders, we are unable to estimate the total number of beneficial holders of our common stock represented by these record holders. ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA A summary of selected financial data as of and for the five years ended December 31, 2018 is set forth below. It should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Years prior to 2016 do not reflect the effects from our January 1, 2018 adoption of ASC Topic 606. (In thousands, except per share data) Statement of Operations Data Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 Revenue $ 17,607 $ 9,634 $ 12,527 $ 9,188 $ 3,485 Net loss available for common shareholders Basic and diluted net loss per share Weighted-average shares outstanding basic and diluted (27,250) (0.31) 86,983 (25,486) (0.35) 72,786 (17,981) (0.35) 51,958 (14,542) (0.31) 46,540 Balance Sheet Data Cash and cash equivalents Working capital (deficit) Total assets Long-term liabilities Total shareholders' equity (deficit) $ 13,766 $ 16,966 $ 15,139 $ 7,888 $ (539) 23,033 728 4,117 4,143 29,767 607 10,086 11,417 20,395 238 13,937 3,371 14,042 6,491 (153) (18,120) (0.44) 41,599 8,349 5,040 11,945 488 6,872 ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Overview Our business strategy is to commercialize our PicoP® scanning technology by enabling OEMs and ODMs to produce end-user products via three go-to-market paths: 1. Design and sell LBS engines directly to OEMs and ODMs to incorporate inside their products; 18 t r o p e R l a u n n A 2. License our LBS technology and sell key components to OEMs and ODMs to create their own scanning engines; and 3. License LBS technology to OEMs and ODMs who developed their own key components. In 2018, 57% of our revenue was generated from the five-year license agreement we signed in May 2018, 42% of our revenue was generated from development contracts, and 1% was generated from performance on contracts for prototype units. In 2018, one customer accounted for $10.0 million in revenue, representing 57% of our total revenue and a second customer accounted for $7.4 million in revenue, representing 42% of our total revenue. In 2017, 67% of our revenue was generated from development contracts, 24% of our revenue was generated from product sales, 5% was generated from performance on contracts for prototype units, and 4% was generated from ongoing per unit royalties. In 2017, one customer accounted for $5.8 million in revenue, representing 60% of our total revenue, and a second customer accounted for $2.3 million in revenue, representing 24% of our total revenue. We have incurred substantial losses since inception and expect to incur a significant loss during the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018. We have funded operations to date primarily through the sale of common stock, convertible preferred stock, warrants, the issuance of convertible debt and, to a lesser extent, from development contract revenues, product sales and licensing activities. There can be no assurance that additional capital will be available or that, if available, it will be available on terms acceptable to us on a timely basis. We cannot be certain that we will succeed in commercializing our technology or products. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements were prepared assuming we will continue as a going concern and do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern. Key accounting policies and estimates Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that materially affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent liabilities. We evaluate our estimates on a continuous basis. We base our estimates on historical data, terms of existing contracts, our evaluation of trends in the consumer display and 3D sensing industries, information provided by our current and prospective customers and strategic partners, information available from other outside sources and on various other assumptions we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. The results form the basis for making judgments regarding the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe the following key accounting policies require significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Revenue recognition Revenues are recognized when control of the promised goods or services are transferred to our customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration that we expect to receive in exchange for those goods or services. We generate all of our revenue from contracts with customers. Our contract revenue in a particular period is dependent upon when we enter into a contract, the value of the contracts we have entered into, and the availability of technical resources to perform work on the contracts. We recognize contract revenue either at a point in time, or over time, depending upon the characteristics of the individual contract. If control of the deliverable(s) occur over time, the revenue is recognized in proportion to the transfer of control. If control passes to the customer only upon completion and transfer of the asset, revenue is recognized at the completion of the contract. In contracts that include significant customer acceptance provisions, we recognize revenue only upon acceptance of the deliverable(s). We identify each performance obligation in our development contracts at contract inception. The contracts generally include product development and customization specified by the customer. In contracts with multiple performance obligations, we identify each performance obligation and evaluate whether the performance obligations are distinct within the context of the contract. Determining whether products and services are considered distinct performance obligations that should be accounted for separately versus together may require significant judgment. Performance obligations that are not distinct at contract inception are combined. A n n u a l R e p o r t 19 If we identify multiple distinct performance obligations, we evaluate each performance obligation to determine if there is a stand-alone selling price. In instances where stand-alone selling price is not directly observable, such as when we do not sell the product or service separately, we determine the stand-alone selling price using information that may include market conditions and other observable inputs. Judgment is required to determine the stand-alone selling price for each distinct performance obligation. Our development contracts are primarily fixed-fee contracts. If control of deliverables occurs over time, we recognize revenue on fixed fee contracts on the proportion of total cost expended (under Topic 606, the ‘input method’) to the total cost expected to complete the contract performance obligation. For contracts that require the input method for revenue recognition, the determination of the total cost expected to complete the performance obligations on fixed fee contracts involves significant judgment. We incorporate revisions to hour and cost estimates when the causal facts become known. Inventory valuation Inventory is computed using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method and is stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. We make judgments and estimates to value our inventory and make adjustments to its carrying value. We review several factors in determining the market value of our inventory including: evaluating the replacement cost of the raw materials, the net realizable value of the finished goods, and the likelihood of obsolescence. If we do not achieve our targeted sales prices, if market conditions for our components or products were to decline, or if we do not achieve our sales forecast, additional reductions in the carrying value of the inventory would be required. Share-based compensation We issue share-based compensation to employees in the form of stock options and restricted stock units (RSUs), and performance stock units (PSUs). We account for the share-based awards by recognizing the fair value of share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the service period of the award, net of estimated forfeitures. The fair value of stock options is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The fair value of RSUs is determined by the closing price of our common stock on the grant date. The PSUs are valued using a binomial option pricing model using the following inputs: stock price, volatility, and risk-free interest rates. Changes in estimated inputs or using other option valuation methods may result in materially different option values and share- based compensation expense. Income taxes Significant judgment is required in evaluating our tax position and in determining our provision for income taxes, our deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowance recorded against our net deferred tax assets. We record a valuation allowance when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Based on our history of losses since inception, the available objective evidence creates sufficient uncertainty regarding the realizability of the deferred tax assets. Our actual tax exposure may differ from our estimates and any such differences may impact income our tax expense in the period in which such determination is made. The key accounting policies described above are not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by generally accepted accounting principles, with no need for us to apply judgment or make estimates. There are also areas in which our judgment in selecting any available alternative would not produce a materially different result to our consolidated financial statements. Additional information about our accounting policies, and other disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles, are set forth in the notes to our consolidated financial statements. Inflation has not had a material impact on our revenues or income from continuing operations over the three most recent fiscal years. t r o p e R l a u n n A Results of Operations YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017. Product revenue 20 (In thousands) Product revenue % of total revenue % of total revenue 2017 2018 $ change % change $ - - $ 2,300 23.9 $ (2,300) (100.0) Product revenue is revenue from sales of our products which are LBS engines, MEMS and ASICs. Revenue is recognized when the product is shipped to the customer because control passes to the customer at the point of shipment. Our product sales generally include acceptance provisions, however, because we generally can objectively determine that we have met agreed-upon customer specifications prior to shipment, control of the item passes at the time of shipment. We did not recognize any product revenue during the year ended December 31, 2018. Product revenue backlog at December 31, 2018 and 2017 was zero and $4.3 million, respectively. The change in backlog from September 30, 2018 to December 31, 2018 was due to the uncertainty of fulfilling the remainder of our March 2017 order from Ragentek. We are pursuing our legal rights to enforce the contract. License and royalty revenue % of total revenue % of total revenue 2017 2018 $ change % change (In thousands) License and royalty revenue $ 10,011 56.9 $ 350 3.6 $ 9,661 2,760.3 License and royalty revenue is revenue under license agreements to our PicoP® scanning technology. We recognize revenue on upfront license fees at a point in time if the nature of the license granted is a right-to-use license, representing functional intellectual property with significant standalone functionality. If the nature of the license granted is a right-to-access license, representing symbolic intellectual property, which excludes significant standalone functionality, we recognize revenue over the period of time we have ongoing obligations under the agreement. We will recognize revenue from sales-based royalties on the basis of the quarterly reports provided by our customer as to the number of royalty-bearing products sold or otherwise distributed. In the event that reports are not received, we will estimate the number of royalty-bearing products sold by our customers. In May 2018, we signed a five-year license agreement with a customer granting them exclusive license to our LBS technology for display-only applications. The license represents functional intellectual property which derives a substantial portion of its utility from its significant standalone functionality. The intellectual property is not expected to substantially change during the license period, nor are we contractually or practically required to use updated intellectual property during the license life. During the year ended December 31, 2018 we completed the performance obligations required by the contract. As a result, we recognized $10.0 million in license revenue during the year ended December 31, 2018. During the year ended December 31, 2018 we recognized $11,000 from ongoing per unit royalties. During the year ended December 31, 2017 we recognized $350,000 from ongoing per unit royalties. Contract revenue (In thousands) Contract revenue % of total revenue % of total revenue 2017 2018 $ change % change $ 7,596 43.1 $ 6,984 72.5 $ 612 8.8 Contract revenue includes revenue from performance on development contracts and the sale of prototype units and evaluation kits based on our PicoP® scanning engine. Our contract revenue in a particular period is dependent upon when we enter into a contract, the value of the contracts we have entered into, and the availability of technical resources to perform work on the contracts. We recognize contract revenue either at a point in time, or over time, depending upon the characteristics of the individual contract. If control of the deliverable(s) occur over time, the revenue is recognized in proportion to the transfer of control. If control passes to the customer only upon completion and transfer of the asset, revenue is recognized at the completion of the contract. In contracts that include significant customer acceptance provisions, we recognize revenue only upon acceptance of the deliverable(s). 21 A n n u a l R e p o r t We identify each performance obligation in our development contracts at contract inception. The contracts generally include product development and customization specified by the customer. In contracts with multiple performance obligations, we identify each performance obligation and evaluate whether the performance obligations are distinct within the context of the contract. Performance obligations that are not distinct at contract inception are combined. Our development contracts are primarily fixed-fee contracts. If control of deliverables occurs over time, we recognize revenue on fixed fee contracts on the proportion of total cost expended (under Topic 606, the “input method”) to the total cost expected to complete the contract performance obligation. For contracts that require the input method for revenue recognition, the determination of the total cost expected to complete the performance obligations on fixed fee contracts involves significant judgment. We incorporate revisions to hour and cost estimates when the causal facts become known. In April 2017, we signed a contract with a major technology company to develop an LBS display system. Under the terms of this agreement, we may receive $14.6 million in fees for development contingent on completion of milestones. As of December 31, 2018, we have received $10.7 million in fees for development work. We are recognizing revenue on the $14.6 million in development fees over time utilizing the input method of total costs expended to total cost expected to complete the performance obligation. The original contract was for $14.0 million in fees for development, but the customer added $632,000 in additional work to total $14.6 million. As of December 31, 2018, we have recognized $12.1 million of contract revenue from development fees on this agreement. The increase in contract revenue during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the same period in 2017 was attributed to increased contract activity. Our contract backlog, including orders for prototype units and evaluation kits, at December 31, 2018 and 2017 was approximately $2.5 million and $9.3 million, respectively. The April 2017 development contract represents $2.5 million of the contract backlog and is scheduled for completion during the second quarter of 2019. Cost of product revenue (In thousands) Cost of product revenue % of product revenue % of product revenue 2017 2018 $ change % change $ 5,468 n/a $ 4,359 189.5 $ 1,109 25.4 Cost of product revenue includes the direct and allocated indirect costs of products sold to customers. Direct costs include labor, materials, reserves for estimated warranty expenses, and other costs incurred directly, or charged to us by our contract manufacturers, in the manufacture of these products. Indirect costs include labor, manufacturing overhead, and other costs associated with operating our manufacturing capabilities and capacity. Manufacturing overhead includes the costs of procuring, inspecting and storing material, facility and other costs, and is allocated to cost of product revenue based on the proportion of indirect labor which supported production activities. t r o p e R l a u n n A Cost of product revenue can fluctuate significantly from period to period, depending on the product mix and volume, the level of manufacturing overhead expense and the volume of direct material purchased. Cost of product revenue was higher during the year ended December 31, 2018 due to write downs of inventory totaling $4.4 million in 2018 compared to $1.0 million in 2017. This was offset by lower material costs due to zero product shipments compared to the prior year. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we did not expense manufacturing overhead associated with production capacity in excess of production requirements. During the year ended December 31, 2017, we expensed $538,000 of manufacturing overhead associated with production capacity in excess of production requirements. Cost of contract revenue (In thousands) Cost of contract revenue % of contract revenue % of contract revenue 2017 2018 $ change % change $ 5,170 68.1 $ 5,503 78.8 $ (333) (6.1) 22 Cost of contract revenue includes both the direct and allocated indirect costs of performing on contracts and producing prototype units and evaluation kits. Direct costs include labor, materials and other costs incurred directly in producing prototype units and evaluation kits or performing on a contract. Indirect costs include labor and other costs associated with operating our research and development department and building our technical capabilities and capacity. Cost of contract revenue is determined by the level of direct and indirect costs incurred, which can fluctuate substantially from period to period. The decrease in the cost of contract revenue during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the same period in 2017 was attributed to fewer active contracts. Research and development expense (In thousands) Research and development expense 2018 2017 $ change % change $ 24,666 $ 15,096 $ 9,570 63.4 Research and development expense consists of compensation related costs of employees and contractors engaged in internal research and product development activities, direct material to support development programs, laboratory operations, outsourced development and processing work, and other operating expenses. We assign our research and development resources based on the business opportunity of the available projects, the skill mix of the resources available and the contractual commitments we have made to our customers. We believe that a substantial level of continuing research and development expense will be required to further develop our scanning technology. The increase in research and development expense during the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to 2017, was attributable to higher costs related to subcontractors and increased headcount and personnel-related compensation and benefits expenses related to our LBS engine development. Sales, marketing, general and administrative expense (In thousands) Sales, marketing, general and administrative expense 2018 2017 $ change % change $ 9,523 $ 10,156 $ (633) (6.2) Sales, marketing, general and administrative expense includes compensation and support costs for marketing, sales, management and administrative staff, and for other general and administrative costs, including legal and accounting services, consultants and other operating expenses. The decrease in sales, marketing, general and administrative expense during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the same period in 2017 was attributed to the reversal of reserves in connection with the settlement of certain claims of approximately $563,000 and decreased travel and recruiting expenses that were offset partially by increased purchased services. Income taxes No provision for income taxes has been recorded because we have experienced net losses from inception through December 31, 2018. At December 31, 2018, we had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $398.1 million for federal income tax reporting purposes. In addition, we have research and development tax credits of $8.6 million. During 2018, $7.1 million federal net operating losses expired unused. A majority of the net operating loss carryforwards and research and development credits available to offset future taxable income, if any, will expire in varying amounts from 2019 to 2038, if not previously used. In certain circumstances, as specified in the Internal Revenue Code, a 50% or more ownership change by certain combinations of our shareholders during any three year period would result in a limitation on our ability to use a portion of our net operating loss carryforwards. We recognize interest accrued and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense. We did not have any unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2018 or at December 31, 2017. A n n u a l R e p o r t Liquidity and Capital Resources 23 We have incurred significant losses since inception. We have funded operations to date primarily through the sale of common stock, convertible preferred stock, warrants, the issuance of convertible debt and, to a lesser extent, from development contract revenues, product sales, and licensing activities. At December 31, 2018, we had $13.8 million in cash and cash equivalents. Based on our current operating plan that includes expected proceeds from a development contract signed in April 2017 with a major technology company, we anticipate that we have sufficient cash and cash equivalents to fund our operations through June 2019. Our receipt of proceeds under our April 2017 development contract is subject to our completion of certain milestones, and we can provide no assurance that such milestones will be completed. We will require additional capital to fund our operating plan past that time. We plan to obtain additional capital through the issuance of equity or debt securities, product sales and/or licensing activities. There can be no assurance that additional capital will be available to us or, if available, will be available on terms acceptable to us or on a timely basis. If adequate capital resources are not available on a timely basis, we intend to consider limiting our operations substantially. This limitation of operations could include reducing investments in our production capacities, research and development projects, staff, operating costs, and capital expenditures. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern. Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming we will continue as a going concern and do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern. Operating activities Cash used in operating activities totaled $22.6 million during 2018, compared to $15.5 million in 2017. Cash used in operating activities resulted primarily from cash used to fund our net loss, after adjusting for non-cash charges such as share-based compensation, depreciation and amortization charges and changes in operating assets and liabilities. The change in cash flows from operating activities in 2018 was primarily attributable to increased operating expenses versus the prior year. Investing activities Cash used in investing activities totaled $1.1 million in 2018, compared to $3.0 million in 2017. Purchases of property and equipment totaled $1.1 million in 2018, compared to $3.1 million in 2017. We received no proceeds from the sale of property and equipment during 2018, compared to sales proceeds of $59,000 in 2017. Financing activities Cash provided by financing activities totaled $20.5 million in 2018, compared to $20.3 million in 2017. Principal payments under capital leases and long-term debt was $12,000 in 2018 and zero in 2017. The following is a list of our financing activities during 2018 and 2017. t r o p e R l a u n n A (cid:120) (cid:120) (cid:120) (cid:120) In December 2018, we raised $4.2 million before issuance costs of approximately $524,000 through an underwritten public offering of 7.0 million shares of our common stock. In June 2018, we raised $18.0 million before issuance costs of approximately $1.4 million through an underwritten public offering of 14.4 million shares of our common stock. In August 2017, we raised $11.5 million before issuance costs of approximately $1.1 million through an underwritten public offering of 5.5 million shares of our common stock. In August 2017, we raised $3.2 million before issuance costs of approximately $26,000 through a private placement of 1.5 million shares of our common stock. (cid:120) During the second quarter of 2017, we received $906,000 from the exercise of warrants to purchase 460,000 shares of common stock, which warrants were issued in connection with earlier financing transactions. (cid:120) During the second quarter of 2017, we received gross proceeds of $3.7 million before issuance costs of approximately $125,000 from the sale of 1.7 million shares of our common stock under an ATM agreement that was terminated in June 2017 at our election without penalty. (cid:120) During the second quarter of 2017, we received proceeds of $2.2 million from the sale of 1.2 million shares of our common stock as part of a common stock purchase agreement entered into in September 2016 that was terminated in August 2017 at our election without penalty. 24 Our capital requirements will depend on many factors, including, but not limited to, the rate at which OEMs and ODMs introduce products incorporating our PicoP® scanning technology and the market acceptance and competitive position of such products. Our ability to raise capital will depend on numerous factors, including the following: (cid:120) Market acceptance of products incorporating our PicoP® scanning technology; (cid:120) Changes in evaluations and recommendations by any securities analysts following our stock or our industry generally; (cid:120) Announcements by other companies in our industry; (cid:120) Changes in business or regulatory conditions; (cid:120) Announcements or implementation by our competitors of technological innovations or new products; (cid:120) The status of particular development programs and the timing of performance under specific development agreements; (cid:120) Economic and stock market conditions; (cid:120) The cost of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any patent claims and other intellectual property rights; (cid:120) Our ability to establish cooperative development, joint venture and licensing arrangements; or (cid:120) Other factors unrelated to our company or industry. If we are successful in establishing OEM or ODM co-development and joint venture arrangements, we expect our partners to fund certain non-recurring engineering costs for technology development and/or for product development. Nevertheless, we expect our capital requirements to remain high as we expand our activities and operations with the objective of commercializing our PicoP® scanning technology. Contractual obligations The following table lists our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2018 (in thousands): Contractual Obligations Open purchase obligations * Minimum payments under capital leases Minimum payments under operating leases Minimum payments under long-term liabilities Minimum payments under research, royalty and licensing agreements $ < 1 year 5,836 21 654 35 Payments Due By Period 3-5 years > 5 years 1-3 years $ $ 174 33 1,332 18 $ 174 - 871 - - - - - $ Total 6,184 54 2,857 53 12 6,558 $ 24 1,581 $ 24 1,069 $ $ 12 12 † $ 72 9,220 * Open purchase obligations represent commitments to purchase inventory, materials, capital equipment, maintenance agreements and other goods used in the normal operation of our business. + License and royalty obligations continue through the lives of the underlying patents, which is currently through at least 2024. Recent accounting pronouncements See Note 2, “Summary of significant accounting policies,” in the Notes to the consolidated financial statements found in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K. ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK Interest Rate and Market Liquidity Risks As of December 31, 2018, all of our cash and cash equivalents have variable interest rates. Therefore, we believe our exposure to market and interest rate risks is not material. Our investment policy generally directs that the investment managers should select investments to achieve the following goals: principal preservation, adequate liquidity, and return. As of December 31, 2018, our cash and cash equivalents are comprised of short-term highly rated money market savings accounts. The values of cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2018, are as follows (in thousands): 25 A n n u a l R e p o r t Cash and cash equivalents Less than one year Amount Percent $ $ 13,766 - 13,766 100 % - 100 % Foreign Exchange Rate Risk Our major contract and collaborative research and development agreements, product sales, and licensing activity payments are currently made in U.S. dollars. However, in the future we may enter into contracts or collaborative research and development agreements in foreign currencies that may subject us to foreign exchange rate risk. We have entered into purchase orders and supply agreements in foreign currencies in the past and may enter into such arrangements, from time to time, in the future. We believe our exposure to currency fluctuations related to these arrangements is not material. We may enter into foreign currency hedges to offset material exposure to currency fluctuations when we can adequately determine the timing and amounts of the exposure. t r o p e R l a u n n A 26 ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Page 28 29 30 31 32 33 A n n u a l R e p o r t 27 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of MicroVision, Inc. Opinion on the Financial Statements We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of MicroVision, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes and schedule (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 5, 2019, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Going Concern Uncertainty The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and has an accumulated deficit that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Change in Accounting Principle As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for revenue from contracts with customers. Basis for Opinion These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures to respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. t r o p e R l a u n n A /s/ Moss Adams LLP Seattle, Washington March 5, 2019 We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2012. 28 MicroVision, Inc. Consolidated Balance Sheets (In thousands) Assets Current assets Cash and cash equivalents Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $0 and $26, respectively Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts Inventory Other current assets Total current assets $ Property and equipment, net Restricted cash Intangible assets, net Other assets Total assets Liabilities and shareholders' equity Current liabilities Accounts payable Accrued liabilities Billings on uncompleted contracts in excess of related costs Other current liabilities Current portion of capital lease obilgations Total current liabilities Capital lease obligations, net of current portion Deferred rent, net of current portion Other long-term liabilities Total liabilities Commitments and contingencies (Note 12) Shareholders' equity Preferred stock, par value $0.001; 25,000 shares authorized; zero and zero shares issued and outstanding, respectively Common stock, par value $0.001; 150,000 shares authorized; 100,105 and 78,597 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively Additional paid-in capital Accumulated deficit Total shareholders' equity Total liabilities and shareholders' equity $ $ $ December 31, 2018 2017 $ $ $ 13,766 476 987 1,109 1,311 17,649 2,993 435 486 1,470 23,033 2,411 5,602 - 10,154 21 18,188 33 695 - 18,916 16,966 15 680 4,541 1,015 23,217 3,251 435 602 2,262 29,767 3,063 5,864 5 10,142 - 19,074 - 302 305 19,681 - - 100 550,133 (546,116) 4,117 23,033 $ 79 528,873 (518,866) 10,086 29,767 A n n u a l R e p o r t The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 29 MicroVision, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Operations (In thousands, except per share data) Product revenue License and royalty revenue Contract revenue Total revenue Cost of product revenue Cost of contract revenue Total cost of revenue Gross profit Research and development expense Sales, marketing, general and administrative expense Total operating expenses Loss from operations Other expense, net Net loss Net loss per share - basic and diluted Year Ended December 31, 2018 - 10,011 7,596 17,607 5,468 5,170 10,638 6,969 24,666 9,523 34,189 (27,220) (30) (27,250) (0.31) $ $ $ 2017 2,300 350 6,984 9,634 4,359 5,503 9,862 (228) 15,096 10,156 25,252 (25,480) (6) (25,486) (0.35) $ $ $ Weighted-average shares outstanding - basic and diluted 86,983 72,786 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. t r o p e R l a u n n A 30 MicroVision, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity (In thousands) Balance at December 31, 2016 Share-based compensation expense Exercise of warrants and options Sales of common stock Net loss Balance at December 31, 2017 Share-based compensation expense Sales of common stock Net loss Balance at December 31, 2018 Common Stock Shares Par value Additional paid-in capital Accumulated deficit Total shareholders' equity 68,093 92 506 9,906 - 78,597 108 21,400 - 100,105 $ 68 - - 11 - 79 - 21 - 100 507,249 1,288 991 19,345 - 528,873 1,061 20,199 - $ 550,133 $ (493,380) - - - (25,486) (518,866) - - (27,250) (546,116) $ 13,937 1,288 991 19,356 (25,486) 10,086 1,061 20,220 (27,250) 4,117 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. A n n u a l R e p o r t 31 MicroVision, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (In thousands) $ Cash flows from operating activities Net loss Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations: Depreciation Amortization of intangible assets Non-cash share-based compensation expense Inventory write-downs Other non-cash adjustments Change in: Accounts receivable Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts Inventory Other current and non-current assets Accounts payable Accrued liabilities Billings on uncompleted contracts in excess of related costs Other current liabilities Other long-term liabilities Net cash used in operating activities Cash flows from investing activities Proceeds on sale of property and equipment Purchases of property and equipment Net cash used in investing activities Cash flows from financing activities Principal payments under capital leases and long-term debt Increase in deferred rent Net proceeds from issuance of common stock and exercise of warrants Net cash provided by financing activities Change in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of period Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of period Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities Property and equipment acquired under capital leases Non-cash additions to property and equipment $ $ Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 (27,250) $ (25,486) 1,722 116 1,061 4,414 203 (461) (307) (982) 663 (1,079) (374) (5) 12 (305) (22,572) - (1,118) (1,118) (12) 139 20,363 20,490 (3,200) 17,401 14,201 $ 1,141 116 1,288 1,004 (42) 230 (555) (4,312) (2,314) 1,147 2,226 (138) 9,964 252 (15,479) 59 (3,100) (3,041) - - 20,347 20,347 1,827 15,574 17,401 66 445 $ - 165 The following table provides a reconciliation of the cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash balances as of December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017: Cash and cash equivalents Restricted cash Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash Year Ended December 31, 2018 13,766 435 14,201 $ $ 2017 16,966 435 17,401 $ $ The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 32 t r o p e R l a u n n A MicroVision, Inc. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements For the year ended December 31, 2018 1. THE COMPANY AND LIQUIDITY MicroVision, Inc. is a pioneer in LBS technology that we market under our brand name PicoP®. We have developed our proprietary PicoP® scanning technology that can be adopted by our customers to create high-resolution miniature projection and three-dimensional sensing and image capture solutions. PicoP® scanning technology is based on our patented expertise in MEMS, laser diodes, opto-mechanics, and electronics and how those elements are packaged into a small form factor, lower power scanning engine that can display, interact and sense, depending on the needs of the application. For display, the engine can project a high-quality image on any surface (pico projection), or a retina (AR). For sensing, we use IR lasers to capture three-dimensional data in the form of a point cloud. Interactivity uses the 3D sensing function and the display function to simultaneously project an image that the user can then interact with as one would a touch screen. We have incurred significant losses since inception. We have funded our operations to date primarily through the sale of common stock, convertible preferred stock, warrants, the issuance of convertible debt and, to a lesser extent, from development contract revenues, product sales and licensing activities. At December 31, 2018, we had $13.8 million in cash and cash equivalents. Based on our current operating plan that includes expected proceeds from a development contract signed in April 2017 with a major technology company, we anticipate that we have sufficient cash and cash equivalents to fund our operations through June 2019. Our receipt of proceeds under our April 2017 development contract is subject to our completion of certain milestones, and we can provide no assurance that such milestones will be completed. We will require additional capital to fund our operating plan past that time. We plan to obtain additional capital through the issuance of equity or debt securities, product sales and/or licensing activities. There can be no assurance that additional capital will be available to us or, if available, will be available on terms acceptable to us or on a timely basis. If adequate capital resources are not available on a timely basis, we intend to consider limiting our operations substantially. This limitation of operations could include reducing investments in our production capacities, research and development projects, staff, operating costs, and capital expenditures. We are introducing new technology and products into an emerging market which creates significant uncertainty about our ability to accurately project revenue, costs and cash flows. Our capital requirements will depend on many factors, including, but not limited to, the commercial success of our laser beam scanning (LBS) engines, the rate at which OEMs and ODMs introduce products incorporating our PicoP® scanning technology and the market acceptance and competitive position of such products. If revenues are less than we anticipate, if we fail to meet milestones for future payments or have to repay amounts already received under our April 2017 development contract, if the mix of revenues and the associated margins vary from anticipated amounts or if expenses exceed the amounts budgeted, we may require additional capital earlier than expected to fund our operations. In addition, our operating plan provides for the development of strategic relationships with suppliers of components and systems and equipment manufacturers that may require additional investments by us. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern. Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming we will continue as a going concern and do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern. 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Use of estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from our estimates. We have identified the following areas where estimates and assumptions have been made in preparing the financial statements: revenue recognition, inventory valuation, valuation of share-based payments, income taxes, depreciable lives assessment and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. 33 A n n u a l R e p o r t Cash and cash equivalents and fair value of financial instruments Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, the authoritative guidance establishes a three level fair value inputs hierarchy, and requires an entity to maximize the use of observable valuation inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. We use market data, assumptions and risks we believe market participants would use in measuring the fair value of the asset or liability, including the risks inherent in the inputs and the valuation techniques. Our financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities. The carrying value of our financial instruments approximates fair value due to their short maturities. Our cash equivalents are comprised of short-term highly rated money market savings accounts. Intangible assets Our intangible assets consist exclusively of purchased patents. The patents are amortized using the straight-line method over their estimated period of benefit, ranging from one to seventeen years. Intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. Recoverability of these assets is measured by comparison of their carrying values to the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related intangible assets or group of assets over their remaining lives. Measurement of an impairment loss for our intangible assets is based on the difference between the fair value of the asset and its carrying value. Inventory Inventory consists of raw materials and finished goods assemblies. Inventory is computed using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method and is stated at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Management periodically assesses the need to account for obsolescence of inventory and adjusts the carrying value of inventory to its net realizable value when required. Inventory that will not be consumed through the normal course of business during the next twelve months is classified as “other assets” on the balance sheet. Property and equipment Property and equipment is stated at cost and depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the assets (two to five years) using the straight-line method. As our production needs change, we periodically assess the remaining estimated useful life of our production equipment. If necessary, we adjust the depreciation on our production equipment to reflect the remaining estimated useful life. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of estimated useful lives or the lease term. Costs for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred and expenditures for major improvements are capitalized at cost. Gains or losses on the disposition of assets are reflected in the income statements at the time of disposal. Restricted cash t r o p e R l a u n n A As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, restricted cash was in money market savings accounts and serve as collateral for $435,000 in irrevocable letters of credit. The restricted cash balance includes a letter of credit which is outstanding in connection with a lease agreement for our corporate headquarters building in Redmond, Washington. The balance is required over the term of the lease, which expires in March 2023. Revenue recognition The following is a description of principal activities from which we generate revenue. Revenues are recognized when control of the promised goods or services are transferred to our customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration that we expect to receive in exchange for those goods or services. We generate all of our revenue from contracts with customers. We evaluate contracts based on the 5-step model as stated in Topic 606 as follows: (i) identify the contract, (ii) identify the performance obligations, (iii) determine the transaction price, (iv) allocate the transaction price, and (v) recognize revenue when (or as) performance obligations are satisfied. 34 A contract contains a promise (or promises) to transfer goods or services to a customer. A performance obligation is a promise (or a group of promises) that is distinct, as defined in the revenue standard. The transaction price is the amount of consideration an entity expects to be entitled to from a customer in exchange for providing the goods or services. A number of factors should be considered to determine the transaction price, including whether there is variable consideration, a significant financing component, noncash consideration, or amounts payable to the customer. The determination of variable consideration will require a significant amount of judgment. In estimating the transaction price we will use either the expected value method or the most likely amount method. The transaction price is allocated to the separate performance obligations in the contract based on relative standalone selling prices. Determining the relative standalone selling price can be challenging when goods or services are not sold on a standalone basis. The revenue standard sets out several methods that can be used to estimate a standalone selling price when one is not directly observable. Allocating discounts and variable consideration must also be considered. Allocating the transaction price can require significant judgement on our part. Revenue is recognized when (or as) the customer obtains control of the good or service/performance obligations are satisfied. Topic 606 provides guidance to help determine if a performance obligation is satisfied at a point in time or over time. Where a performance obligation is satisfied over time, the related revenue is also recognized over time. Product revenue We sell our products to customers under a contract or by purchase order. We consider the sale of each individual item to be one performance obligation. The transaction price is generally either at stated product price per quantity or at a fixed amount at contract inception. Revenue is recognized under Topic 606 when the product is shipped to the customer because control passes to the customer at the point of shipment. Our product sales generally include acceptance provisions, however, because we generally can objectively determine that we have met agreed-upon customer specifications prior to shipment, control of the item passes at the time of shipment. License and royalty revenue We recognize revenue on upfront license fees at a point in time if the nature of the license granted is a right-to-use license, representing functional intellectual property with significant standalone functionality. If the nature of the license granted is a right-to-access license, representing symbolic intellectual property, which excludes significant standalone functionality, we recognize revenue over the period of time we have ongoing obligations under the agreement. We will recognize revenue from sales-based royalties on the basis of the quarterly reports provided by our customer as to the number of royalty-bearing products sold or otherwise distributed. In the event that reports are not received, we will estimate the number of royalty-bearing products sold by our customers. Contract revenue Our contract revenue in a particular period is dependent upon when we enter into a contract, the value of the contracts we have entered into, and the availability of technical resources to perform work on the contracts. We recognize contract revenue either at a point in time, or over time, depending upon the characteristics of the individual contract. If control of the deliverable(s) occur over time, the revenue is recognized in proportion to the transfer of control. If control passes to the customer only upon completion and transfer of the asset, revenue is recognized at the completion of the contract. In contracts that include significant customer acceptance provisions, we recognize revenue only upon acceptance of the deliverable(s). A n n u a l R e p o r t We identify each performance obligation in our development contracts at contract inception. The contracts generally include product development and customization specified by the customer. In contracts with multiple performance obligations, we identify each performance obligation and evaluate whether the performance obligations are distinct within the context of the contract. Performance obligations that are not distinct at contract inception are combined. Our development contracts are primarily fixed-fee contracts. If control of deliverables occurs over time, we recognize revenue on fixed fee contracts on the proportion of total cost expended (under Topic 606, the ‘input method’) to the total cost expected to complete the contract performance obligation. For contracts that require the input method for revenue recognition, the determination of the total cost expected to complete the performance obligations on fixed fee 35 contracts involves significant judgment. We incorporate revisions to hour and cost estimates when the causal facts become known. Cost of product revenue Cost of product revenue includes the direct and allocated indirect costs of products sold to customers. Direct costs include labor, materials, reserves for estimated warranty expenses, and other costs incurred directly, or charged to us by our contract manufacturers in the manufacture of these products. Indirect costs include labor, manufacturing overhead, and other costs associated with operating our manufacturing capabilities and capacity. Manufacturing overhead includes the costs of procuring, inspecting and storing material, facility and other costs, and is allocated to cost of product revenue based on the proportion of indirect labor which supported production activities. The cost of product revenue can fluctuate significantly from period to period, depending on the product mix and volume, the level of manufacturing overhead expense and the volume of direct material purchased. Cost of contract revenue Cost of contract revenue includes both the direct and allocated indirect costs of performing on contracts and producing prototype units and evaluation kits based on our PicoP® scanning engine. Direct costs include labor, materials and other costs incurred directly in producing prototype units and evaluation kits or performing on a contract. Indirect costs include labor and other costs associated with operating our research and development department and building our technical capabilities and capacity. Cost of contract revenue is determined by the level of direct and indirect costs incurred, which can fluctuate substantially from period to period. Our overhead, which includes the costs of procuring, inspecting and storing material, and facility and depreciation costs, is allocated to inventory, cost of product revenue, cost of contract revenue, and research and development expense based on the level of effort supporting production or research and development activity. Concentration of credit risk and major customers and suppliers Concentration of credit risk Financial instruments that potentially subject us to a concentration of credit risk are primarily cash equivalents and accounts receivable. We typically do not require collateral from our customers. As of December 31, 2018, our cash and cash equivalents are comprised of short-term highly rated money market savings accounts. Concentration of major customers and suppliers In 2018, one customer accounted for $10.0 million in revenue, representing 57% of our total revenue and a second customer accounted for $7.4 million in revenue, representing 42% of our total revenue. In 2017, one customer accounted for $5.8 million in revenue, representing 60% of our total revenue and a second customer accounted for $2.3 million in revenue, representing 24% of our total revenue. A significant concentration of our components and the products we sell are currently manufactured and obtained from single or limited-source suppliers, which are primarily located in foreign countries. The loss of any single or limited- source supplier, the failure of any of these suppliers to perform as expected, or the disruption in the supply chain of components from these suppliers could subject us to risks and uncertainties regarding, but not limited to, increased cost of sales, possible loss of revenues, or significant delays in product deliveries, any of which could adversely affect our financial condition and operating results. Income taxes Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for differences between the financial statement and tax bases of the assets and liabilities that will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future, based on enacted tax laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Income tax expense is recorded for the amount of income tax payable for the period increased or decreased by the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities during the period. t r o p e R l a u n n A Net loss per share 36 Basic net loss per share is calculated using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the periods. Net loss per share, assuming dilution, is calculated using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding and the dilutive effect of all potentially dilutive securities, including common stock equivalents and convertible securities. Net loss per share, assuming dilution, is equal to basic net loss per share because the effect of dilutive securities outstanding during the periods, including options and warrants computed using the treasury stock method, is anti-dilutive. The components of basic and diluted net loss per share were as follows (in thousands, except loss per share data): Numerator: Net loss available for common shareholders Denominator: Weighted-average common shares outstanding Net loss per share - basic and diluted Year Ended December 31, 2018 (27,250) $ 2017 (25,486) 86,983 72,786 (0.31) $ (0.35) $ $ During each of the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, we excluded the following securities from net loss per share as the effect of including them would have been anti-dilutive. The shares shown represent the number of shares of common stock which would be issued upon conversion in the respective years shown below (in thousands): Options outstanding and warrants exercisable Nonvested restricted stock units Research and development Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 6,619 1,149 7,768 7,007 185 7,192 Research and development expense consists of compensation related costs of employees and contractors engaged in internal research and product development activities, direct material to support development programs, laboratory operations, outsourced development and processing work, and other operating expenses. We assign our research and development resources based on the business opportunity of the available projects, the skill mix of the resources available and the contractual commitments we have made to our customers. Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. We believe that a substantial level of continuing research and development expense will be required to further develop our technology. Share-based compensation We issue share-based compensation to employees in the form of stock options and restricted stock units (RSUs), and performance stock units (PSUs). We account for the share-based awards by recognizing the fair value of share-based compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the service period of the award, net of estimated forfeitures. The fair value of stock options is estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The fair value of RSUs is determined by the closing price of our common stock on the grant date. The PSUs are valued using a binomial option pricing model using the following inputs: stock price, volatility, and risk-free interest rates. Changes in estimated inputs or using other option valuation methods may result in materially different option values and share- based compensation expense. A n n u a l R e p o r t The following table summarizes the amount of share-based compensation expense by line item on the Statement of Operations (in thousands): 37 Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 Cost of product revenue Research and development expense Sales, marketing, general and administrative expense $ $ - 439 622 1,061 $ $ 39 546 703 1,288 Reclassifications Certain reclassifications have been made to prior year financial statements to conform to classifications used in the current year. These reclassifications had no impact on net loss, shareholders' equity or cash flows, as previously reported. Recent accounting pronouncements In June 2018, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update 2018-07 (ASU 2018-07) Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting. Currently, Topic 718 only includes share-based payments to employees. ASU 2018-07 expands the scope of Topic 718 to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees. The new guidance will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2018, including interim periods within that fiscal year. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2018-07 to have a material impact on our financial statements. In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-02 (ASU 2016-02), Leases (Topic 842). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability in the balance sheet for all leases, including operating leases, with terms of more than twelve months. Recognition, measurement and presentation of expenses and cash flows from a lease by a lessee have not significantly changed from previous guidance. The amendments also require qualitative disclosures along with specific quantitative disclosures. The new guidance will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. The amendments may be applied on a modified retrospective basis. We have chosen to adopt this guidance on January 1, 2019 using a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings. The most significant impact will be recognition of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for our office lease. Accounting for our capital leases remains substantially unchanged. Adoption of the standard will result in the recognition of a right-of-use asset of approximately $1.6 million, a lease liability of approximately $2.5 million, and a reduction in other short-term and long-term liabilities of $873,000. Adoption of the standard will not have a material impact on our statement of operations. 3. REVENUE RECOGNITION t r o p e R l a u n n A In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2014-09 (ASU 2014-09), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), an updated standard on revenue recognition. The core principle of the new standard is for companies to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in amounts that reflect the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The new standard also will result in enhanced disclosures about revenue, provide guidance for transactions that were not previously addressed comprehensively, and improve guidance for multiple-element arrangements. We implemented ASU 2014- 09 as of January 1, 2018 using the full retrospective approach, meaning we restated each prior reporting period presented. We performed a review of our revenue generating contracts with customers subject to ASU 2014-09, and implementation of this standard has the following material impacts on our financial statements: i. Timing of revenue recognition under the PicoP® scanning technology license agreement we signed with Sony in March 2015. Under previous guidance, we had been recognizing the upfront license fee payment of $8.0 million on a straight-line basis over a period of eight years. Under the new guidance, the entire $8.0 million upfront license fee payment was recognized in the first quarter of 2015. The result of this change in timing resulted in a decrease of $6.1 million in our beginning 2017 accumulated deficit balance and a reduction in our short-term deferred revenue balance of $999,000 and long-term deferred revenue balance of $5.1 million. License and royalty revenue for the year ended December 31, 2017 was reduced by approximately $999,000. ii. Timing of revenue recognition on product sales. Previously, we recognized revenue after expiration of the contractual acceptance period. Under the new guidance, we recognize revenue when control of the product transfers to 38 the buyer, which may occur before the expiration of the contractual acceptance period. The result of this change was a net decrease in our beginning 2017 accumulated deficit of $527,000, as well as a shift in revenue and cost recognition to earlier quarters in 2017. Disaggregation of revenue The following table provides information about disaggregated revenue by timing of revenue recognition, (in thousands): Product revenue - - - Product revenue 2,300 - 2,300 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Year Ended December 31, 2018 License and royalty revenue Contract revenue 10,011 - 10,011 $ $ 189 7,407 7,596 Year Ended December 31, 2017 License and royalty revenue Contract revenue 350 - 350 $ $ 1,616 5,368 6,984 Total 10,200 7,407 17,607 Total 4,266 5,368 9,634 $ $ $ $ Timing of revenue recognition: Products transferred at a point in time Product and services transferred over time Total Timing of revenue recognition: Products transferred at a point in time Product and services transferred over time Total Contract balances The following table provides information about receivables, contract assets, and contract liabilities from contracts with customers (in thousands): December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 Accounts receivable, net Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts Other current assets Billings on uncompleted contracts in excess of related costs Other current liabilities $ 476 $ 987 - - 10,000 15 680 70 5 10,000 A n n u a l R e p o r t Under Topic 606, our rights to consideration are presented separately depending on whether those rights are conditional or unconditional. We present our unconditional rights to consideration as “accounts receivable” in our Consolidated Balance Sheet. Contract assets represent rights to consideration that are subject to a condition other than the passage of time, and are comprised primarily of costs and estimated profits in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts and estimated accrued sales-based royalty revenue. 39 Contract costs in excess of billing are included in the “Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on uncompleted contracts” line of our Consolidated Balance Sheet. This does not represent a change in presentation for contract fulfillment costs; however, for sales-based royalty revenue, revenue was previously not recognized until quarterly royalty reporting had been received from our customer. Under Topic 606, in the event that reports are not received, we estimate the number of royalty-bearing products sold by our customers and are included in “Other current assets”. Once quarterly royalty reporting has been received, the related contract assets will be transferred to accounts receivable. Significant changes in the contract assets and the contract liabilities balances during the period are as follows (in thousands, except percentages): December 31, 2018 December 31, 2017 $ Change % Change Contract assets Contract liabilities Net contract assets (liabilities) $ $ 987 - 987 $ $ 680 (5) 675 $ $ 307 5 312 45.1 100.0 46.2 During the year ended December 31, 2018, we billed $7.1 million on our development contracts. Of this amount, $680,000 was included in contract assets at December 31, 2017. We also recognized revenue of $7.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2018, resulting in a contract asset of $987,000. Contract acquisition costs Regarding the adoption of Topic 606, we are required to capitalize certain contract acquisition costs consisting primarily of commissions paid when contracts are signed. We currently do not pay any commissions upon the signing of a contract; therefore, no commission cost has been incurred as of December 31, 2018. Transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations The following table includes estimated revenue expected to be recognized in the future related to performance obligations that are unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied at the end of the reporting period. The estimated revenue does not include the $10.0 million upfront payment received from a major technology company to develop an LBS display system due to uncertainty around the timing of recognition. Additionally, the estimated revenue does not include amounts of variable consideration attributable to royalties or unexercised contract renewals (in thousands): 2019 2020 Product revenue License and royalty revenue Contract revenue $ $ - - 2,513 - - - Impacts to Previously Reported Results In accordance with Topic 606, the disclosure of the impact of adoption to our condensed consolidated statements of operations and balance sheets was as follows (in thousands, except per share data): t r o p e R l a u n n A 40 Product revenue License and royalty revenue Contract revenue Cost of product revenue Cost of contract revenue Net loss Net loss per share - basic and diluted Costs and estimated earnings incurred on uncompleted contracts Other current assets Billings on uncompleted contracts Deferred revenue - current Deferred revenue - noncurrent Shareholders' equity: Accumulated deficit As previously reported Year Ended December 31, 2017 New revenue standard adjustment As restated $ $ $ $ 2,300 1,568 7,023 4,359 5,517 (24,243) (0.33) As previously reported 680 945 5 999 4,151 (524,086) - (1,218) (39) - (14) (1,243) (0.02) December 31, 2017 New revenue standard adjustment - 70 - (999) (4,151) 5,220 $ $ 2,300 350 6,984 4,359 5,503 (25,486) (0.35) As restated 680 1,015 5 - - (518,866) Adoption of the standards related to revenue recognition had no impact to cash from or used in operating, investing, or financing activities on our condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. 4. LONG-TERM CONTRACTS In May 2018, we signed a five-year license agreement with a customer granting them exclusive license to our LBS technology for display-only applications. As part of the agreement, we received a first payment of $5.0 million in June 2018 and the second payment of $5.0 million in October 2018. The contract includes requirements that must be met in order to maintain exclusivity. If this customer acquires a customer, we expect orders for component sales. We may also receive payments for non-recurring engineering expenses associated with process and product transfer and qualification milestones. During the year ended December 31, 2018 we completed the performance obligations required by the contract. As a result, we recognized $10.0 million in license and royalty revenue during the year ended December 31, 2018. In April 2017, we signed a contract with a major technology company to develop an LBS display system. Under this agreement, we are working to develop a new generation of MEMS, ASICs and related firmware for a high resolution, LBS-based product that the technology company is planning to produce. Under the agreement, we received an upfront payment of $10.0 million in 2017 and may receive up to $14.6 million in fees for development work that is expected to span into the second quarter of 2019. Our receipt of the development fees is contingent on completion of milestones in 2017, 2018, and into the second quarter of 2019. As of December 31, 2018, we have received $10.7 million in fees for development work and recognized $12.1 million in revenue. Upon successful completion of the development program, if the major technology company decides to manufacture the product with the MicroVision display components, the $10.0 million upfront payment would be applied as a discount to future component purchases from us. If the contract is terminated by the technology company for our failure to meet milestones, the $10.0 million upfront payment is subject to repayment. We are recognizing revenue on the $14.6 million in development fees over time based on the proportion of total cost expended (under Topic 606, the “input method”) to the total cost expected to complete the contract performance obligation. For the year ended December 31, 2018, we have recognized $7.4 million of contract 41 A n n u a l R e p o r t revenue from development fees on this agreement. We have an amount equal to the $10.0 million upfront payment classified as an other current liability on the balance sheet. The following table summarizes the costs incurred on our revenue contracts (in thousands): December 31, Costs and estimated earnings incurred on uncompleted contracts Billings on uncompleted contracts 2018 12,087 (11,100) 987 $ $ Included in consolidated balance sheets under the following captions: Costs and estimated earnings incurred on uncompleted contracts Billings on uncompleted contracts in excess of related costs $ $ 987 - 987 2017 4,680 (4,005) 675 680 (5) 675 $ $ $ $ 5. INVENTORY Inventory consists of the following (in thousands): Raw materials Finished goods December 31, 2018 32 1,077 1,109 $ $ 2017 53 4,488 4,541 $ $ As of December 31, 2018 and 2017, $1.4 million and $2.2 million, respectively, of materials that are not expected to be consumed during the next twelve months are classified as “other assets” on the balance sheet. We recorded inventory write-downs of $4.4 million in 2018 and $1.0 million in 2017. 6. ACCRUED LIABILITIES Accrued liabilities consists of the following (in thousands): Bonuses Adverse purchase commitments Payroll and payroll taxes Compensated absences Warranty Relocation Deferred rent credit Separation agreement Prepayments from customers Other December 31, 2018 2017 $ $ 1,475 - 608 493 25 22 178 241 1,585 975 5,602 $ $ 1,143 500 631 436 153 90 37 359 1,738 777 5,864 7. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Property and equipment consists of the following (in thousands): t r o p e R l a u n n A 42 Production equipment Leasehold improvements Computer hardware and software/lab equipment Office furniture and equipment Less: Accumulated depreciation December 31, 2018 7,124 909 6,082 1,342 15,457 (12,464) 2,993 $ $ $ $ 2017 6,573 601 5,515 1,304 13,993 (10,742) 3,251 Depreciation expense was $1.7 million in 2018 and $1.1 million in 2017. Capital leases are collateralized by the related assets financed and by security deposits held by the lessors under the lease agreements. The cost and accumulated depreciation of equipment under capital leases was $770,000 and $713,000 in the year ended December 31, 2018 and $704,000 and $704,000 in the year ended December 31, 2017. 8. INTANGIBLE ASSETS Our intangible assets consist exclusively of technology-based purchased patents. The gross value of our intangible assets was $1.6 million in each of the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. Amortization expense was $116,000 in 2018 and $116,000 in 2017. In 2018 and 2017 there were no impairments recorded and none of our patents were abandoned in prosecution. The following table outlines our estimated future amortization expense related to intangible assets held at December 31, 2018 (in thousands): Years Ended December 31, 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Thereafter Amount 115 98 80 71 54 68 486 $ $ 9. COMMON STOCK In December 2018, we raised $4.2 million before issuance costs of approximately $524,000 through an underwritten public offering of 7.0 million shares of our common stock. In June 2018, we raised $18.0 million before issuance costs of approximately $1.4 million through an underwritten public offering of 14.4 million shares of our common stock. In August 2017, we raised $11.5 million before issuance costs of approximately $1.1 million through an underwritten public offering of 5.5 million shares of our common stock. In August 2017, we raised $3.2 million before issuance costs of approximately $26,000 through a private placement of 1.5 million shares of our common stock. During the second quarter of 2017, we received $906,000 from the exercise of warrants to purchase 460,000 shares of common stock, which warrants were issued in connection with earlier financing transactions. During the second quarter of 2017, we received gross proceeds of $3.7 million before issuance costs of approximately $125,000 from the sale of 1.7 million shares of our common stock under an ATM agreement that was terminated in June 2017 at our election without penalty. During the second quarter of 2017, we received proceeds of $2.2 million from the sale of 1.2 million shares of our common stock as part of a common stock purchase agreement entered into in September 2016 that was terminated in August 2017 at our election without penalty. A n n u a l R e p o r t 43 10. WARRANTS During the second quarter of 2017, we received $906,000 from the exercise of warrants to purchase 460,000 shares of common stock, which warrants were issued in connection with earlier financing transactions. The outstanding warrants to purchase 2.0 million shares of our common stock that we sold in our March 2014 offering have an exercise price of $2.47 per share and expire in March 2019. The following table summarizes activity with respect to our common stock warrants for the periods shown below (in thousands): Outstanding at December 31, 2016 Granted: Exercise price less than intrinsic value Exercise price greater than intrinsic value Exercised Canceled/expired Outstanding at December 31, 2017 Granted: Exercise price less than intrinsic value Exercise price greater than intrinsic value Exercised Canceled/expired Outstanding at December 31, 2018 Exercisable at December 31, 2018 Warrants to purchase common shares 3,761 - - (460) (1,328) 1,973 - - - - 1,973 1,973 $ $ Weighted- average exercise price 2.23 - - 1.97 1.97 2.47 - - - - 2.47 2.47 t r o p e R l a u n n A There were no common stock warrants issued in 2018 and 2017. The following table summarizes information about our common stock warrants outstanding and exercisable at December 31, 2018 (in thousands): Exercise price $2.47 Outstanding at December 31, 2018 1,973 1,973 Warrants outstanding Weighted-average remaining Warrants exercisable Exercisable at contractual term Weighted-average December 31, Weighted-average (in years) exercise price 2018 exercise price 0.21 $ 2.47 $ 1,973 1,973 2.47 11. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION We use the straight-line attribution method to allocate the fair value of share-based compensation awards over the requisite service period for each award. The valuation of and accounting for share-based awards includes a number of complex and subjective estimates. These estimates include, but are not limited to, the future volatility of our stock price, future stock option exercise behaviors, estimated employee turnover, and award forfeiture rates. Description of Incentive Plan Our 2013 Incentive Plan has 10.8 million shares authorized, of which 3.0 million shares were available for awards as of December 31, 2018. Options Valuation Methodology and Assumptions 44 We use the Black-Scholes option valuation model to determine the fair value of options granted and use the closing price of our common stock as the fair market value of our stock on that date. We consider historical stock price volatilities, volatilities of similar companies and other factors in determining estimates of future volatilities. We use historical lives, including post-termination exercise behavior, as the basis for estimating expected lives. Risk-free rates are based on the U.S. Treasury Yield Curve, as published by the U.S. Treasury. The following table summarizes the weighted-average valuation assumptions and weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted during the periods shown below: Assumptions (weighted-average) Volatility Expected term (in years) Risk-free rate Expected dividends Pre-vest forfeiture rate Grant date fair value of options granted Year Ended December 31, 2018 2017 73% 3.2 2.8% 0.0% 8.5% 0.58 $ 79% 4.0 1.6% 0.0% 8.5% 1.03 $ Options Activity and Positions The following table summarizes activity and positions with respect to options for the periods shown below (in thousands): Options Outstanding as of December 31, 2016 Granted Exercised Forfeited or expired Outstanding as of December 31, 2017 Granted Exercised Forfeited or expired Outstanding as of December 31, 2018 Shares 4,003 1,724 (46) (647) 5,034 1,229 - (1,617) 4,646 Weighted-average remaining contractual term (in years) 7.3 - - - 6.6 - - - 7.0 Weighted-average exercise price 3.94 1.76 1.87 6.09 2.94 1.16 - 3.51 2.27 $ Vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 2018 Exercisable as of December 31, 2018 4,364 2,252 $ $ 3.04 2.30 6.8 5.0 Aggregate intrinsic value 4 - - - 53 - - - - - - $ $ $ $ The intrinsic value of options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2017 was $40,000. No options were exercised during the year ended December 31, 2018. The total grant date fair value of options vested during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was $958,000 and $1.0 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2018, our unrecognized share-based compensation was $1.6 million related to options, which we plan to amortize over the next 2.3 years. On September 30, 2018, we issued 583,333 performance stock units to our executives. The performance criteria is the achievement of the Company’s share price of $2.50 sustained for 60 of trailing 90 days before the PSUs are earned (“Earned PSUs”). To the extent the PSUs become Earned PSUs they shall be eligible to vest as to one-third (1/3) of the PSUs subject to the Award on the each of the first three (3) anniversaries of June 5, 2018, subject to the executive’s continuous employment on the applicable vesting date. If there are outstanding but unearned PSUs as of a vesting date and the PSUs become Earned PSUs prior to the next vesting date the Earned PSUs that would have vested on any earlier vesting date shall become immediately vested and deliverable. The PSUs are valued using a binomial option 45 A n n u a l R e p o r t pricing model using the following inputs: stock price, volatility, and risk-free interest rates. We issued 291,667 RSUs to our executives that vest one-third on each of the first three anniversaries of June 5, 2018. We also issued 180,000 RSUs to members of the board. The members of the board vest ownership in the RSUs on the earlier of the day prior to the date of the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders following the date of grant, or one year from the grant date, provided the member of the board continues to serve as a director on the vesting date. As of December 31, 2018, our unrecognized share-based compensation related to the RSUs was $607,000, which we plan to amortize over the next 2.1 years. As of December 31, 2018, our unrecognized share-based compensation related to the PSUs was $16,000, which we plan to amortize over the next 2.4 years. 12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES Litigation During 2018, we settled all related claims with Asia Optical relating to its previously filed complaint for arbitration for less than related reserves. We are subject to various claims and pending or threatened lawsuits in the normal course of business. We are not currently party to any legal proceedings that management believes are reasonably possible to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Purchase commitments At December 31, 2018, we have $6.2 million in open purchase obligations that represent commitments to purchase inventory, materials, capital equipment, and other goods used in the normal operation of our business. Lease commitments We lease our office space and certain equipment under capital and operating leases with initial or remaining terms in excess of one year. Future minimum rental commitments under capital and operating leases for years ending December 31, are as follows (in thousands): Years Ended December 31, 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 Thereafter Total minimum lease payments Less: amount representing interest Present value of capital lease obligations Less: current portion Long-term portion at December 31, 2018 Capital leases Operating leases 654 656 676 696 175 - 2,857 $ $ 27 27 9 - - - 63 (9) 54 (21) 33 $ $ Net rent expense was $834,000 in 2018 and $531,000 in 2017. 13. INCOME TAXES A provision for income taxes has not been recorded for 2018 and 2017 due to the valuation allowances placed against the net operating losses and deferred tax assets arising during such periods. A valuation allowance has been recorded for all deferred tax assets. Based on our history of losses since inception, the available objective evidence creates sufficient uncertainty regarding the realizability of the deferred tax assets. At December 31, 2018, we have net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $398.1 million for federal income tax reporting purposes. In addition, we have research and development tax credits of $8.6 million. During 2018, $7.1 million federal net operating losses expired unused. A majority of the net operating loss carryforwards and research 46 t r o p e R l a u n n A and development credits available to offset future taxable income, if any, will expire in varying amounts from 2019 to 2038, if not previously used. In certain circumstances, as specified in the Internal Revenue Code, a 50% or more ownership change by certain combinations of our shareholders during any three year period would result in limitations on our ability to use a portion of our net operating loss carryforwards. On December 22, 2017, legislation commonly known as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, or the Tax Act, was signed in to law. The Tax Act, among other changes, reduces the U.S. federal corporate tax rate from 35% to 21%, requires taxpayers to pay a one-time transition tax on earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries that were previously tax deferred and creates new taxes on certain foreign sourced earnings. We applied the guidance in Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (“SAB 118”) when accounting for the enactment date effects of the Tax Act in 2017 and throughout 2018. At December 31, 2017, we completed our accounting for all the enactment date income tax effects of the Tax Act under Accounting Standards Codification 740, Income Taxes. At December 31, 2017 and 2018, we did not have any foreign subsidiaries and the international aspects of the Tax Act are not applicable. Our accounting for these items is now complete. We implemented ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), as of January 1, 2018 using the full retrospective approach. The application of the full retrospective approach had no impact to 2018 and prior income tax expense due to a full valuation allowance. The effect of adoption reduced our 2017 deferred tax assets by $1.1 million, which was offset by a change in valuation allowance. Deferred tax assets are summarized as follows (in thousands): Deferred tax assets Reserves Net operating loss carryforwards R&D credit carryforwards Depreciation/amortization deferred Other Net deferred taxes before valuation allowance Less: Valuation allowance Deferred tax assets December 31, 2018 1,152 83,608 8,593 15,884 6,076 115,313 (115,313) - $ $ 2017 1,561 82,210 7,435 13,005 5,944 110,155 (110,155) - $ $ Certain net operating losses arise from the deductibility for tax purposes of compensation under nonqualified stock options equal to the difference between the fair value of the stock on the date of exercise and the exercise price of the options. For financial reporting purposes, the tax effect of this deduction, when recognized, is accounted for as an income tax benefit. We did not have any unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2018 or 2017. We recognize interest accrued and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense. During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 we did not recognize any interest or penalties. We file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various states. Due to our operating loss and credit carryforwards, the U.S. federal statute of limitations remains open for 1998 and onward. A n n u a l R e p o r t 14. RETIREMENT SAVINGS PLAN We have a retirement savings plan that qualifies under Internal Revenue Code Section 401(k). The plan covers all qualified employees. Contributions to the plan are made at the discretion of our Board of Directors. During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 we contributed $376,000 and $278,000 to the plan, respectively. 15. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Unaudited) 47 The following table summarizes our unaudited quarterly financial information for the periods shown below (in thousands, except per share data): $ $ $ $ December 31, 1,833 (2,606) (11,948) (0.13) December 31, 2,302 (248) (8,119) (0.10) Fiscal Year 2018 $ September 30, 11,572 8,927 289 - June 30, March 31, $ 2,014 333 (8,459) (0.10) 2,188 315 (7,132) (0.09) Fiscal Year 2017 $ September 30, 5,425 (278) (5,762) (0.08) June 30, March 31, $ 1,339 346 (5,656) (0.08) 568 (48) (5,949) (0.09) Revenue Gross profit Net income (loss) Net loss per share, basic and diluted Revenue Gross profit Net income (loss) Net loss per share, basic and diluted 16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS In January 2019, we sold 2.0 million shares of our common stock at a price of $0.60 per share to Shehnee Lawrence- Farhi in a registered direct offering for gross proceeds of $1.2 million. In March 2019, we filed a Notice of Arbitration in Hong Kong against Ragentek alleging breach of contract. The relief sought is $4.0 million dollars plus interest and arbitration costs. At this time we cannot predict the likelihood of a favorable outcome. ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE There have been no changes in or disagreements with accountants on accounting or financial disclosure matters during our fiscal years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES (a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and the Chief Financial Officer (CFO) evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e)) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), prior to the filing of this Form 10-K. Based upon that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that, as of December 31, 2018, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective. (b) Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f). Our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on its evaluation under the framework in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013), our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2018. (c) Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls. Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018 has been audited by Moss Adams LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its report, which is included herein. t r o p e R l a u n n A 48 (d) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2018 which has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. A n n u a l R e p o r t 49 Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm To the Shareholders and the Board of Directors of MicroVision, Inc. Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting We have audited MicroVision, Inc.’s (the “Company”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO. We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated balance sheets of MicroVision, Inc. as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes and schedule (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”) and our report dated March 5, 2019, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and included explanatory paragraphs relating to going concern uncertainty and change in accounting principle. Basis for Opinion The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting included in Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. t r o p e R l a u n n A Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. /s/ Moss Adams LLP Seattle, Washington March 5, 2019 50 ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION None. PART III. ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Information regarding executive officers is included in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K in Item 4A. The information required by this Item 10 of Form 10-K and not provided in Item 4A will be included under the caption "Discussion of Proposals Recommended by the Board" in our 2019 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. Our 2019 Proxy Statement will be filed with the SEC prior to our 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION The information required by this Item 11 of Form 10-K will be included under the captions "Executive Compensation," "Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation," and "Director Compensation for 2018" in our 2019 Proxy Statement and are incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS Information as of December 31, 2018, regarding equity compensation plans approved and not approved by shareholders is summarized in the following table (in thousands, except per share data): Equity Compensation Plan Information Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a) $ 4,646 - 4,646 Weighted- average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights (b) 2.27 - Number of securities remaining available for further issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a)) (c) 2,991 - 2,991 Plan Category Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders Total The other information required by this Item 12 of Form 10-K will be included under the caption "Information about MicroVision Common Stock Ownership" in our 2019 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE The information required by this Item 13 of Form 10-K will be included under the captions "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" and "Board Meetings and Committees" in our 2019 Proxy Statement and are incorporated herein by reference. ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES The information required by this Item 14 of Form 10-K will be included under the caption "Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm" in our 2019 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference. A n n u a l R e p o r t PART IV. ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES (A) Documents filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K: 51 1. Consolidated Financial Statements (cid:120) Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (cid:120) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2018 and 2017 (cid:120) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 (cid:120) Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 (cid:120) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 (cid:120) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 2. Financial Statement Schedules Schedule II MicroVision, Inc. Valuation and Qualifying Accounts and Reserves Schedule (In thousands) Year Ended December 31, 2017 Tax valuation allowance 2018 Tax valuation allowance Additions Balance at beginning of fiscal period Charges to costs and expenses Charges to other accounts Deductions fiscal period Balance at end of 166,844 (55,608) 111,236 4,077 - - - - 111,236 115,313 All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, or because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto. t r o p e R l a u n n A 52 3. Exhibits The following exhibits are referenced or included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Exhibit Number Description 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 4.1 4.2 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 23.1 31.1 31.2 32.1 32.2 101.INS 101.SCH 101.CAL 101.DEF 101.LAB 101.PRE Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of MicroVision, Inc., as amended.(2) Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of MicroVision, Inc.(4) Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of MicroVision, Inc. dated June 7, 2018.(7) Bylaws of MicroVision, Inc. (5) Form of Specimen Stock Certificate for Common Stock.(1) Form of Warrant dated March 18, 2014 issued under the Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of March 13, 2014 by and between MicroVision, Inc. and the investors named therein.(6) 2013 MicroVision, Inc. Incentive Plan, as amended.(7)* Third Amendment to Lease Agreement between BRE WA Office Owner, LLC and MicroVision, Inc., dated July 25, 2017.(8) Change of Control Severance Plan.(3)* Employment Agreement between MicroVision, Inc. and Perry Mulligan dated November 21, 2017.(8)* Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm – Moss Adams LLP. Principal Executive Officer Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Principal Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Principal Executive Officer Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Principal Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) and Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. XBRL Instance Document XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) * Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Post-Effective Amendment to Form S-3 Registration Statement, Registration No. 333-102244. Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009. Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 17, 2012. Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 27, 2013. Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 13, 2014. Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Amendment No. 2 to Form S-1 Registration Statement, Registration No. 333-222857. Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. Management contracts and compensatory plans and arrangements required to be filed as exhibits pursuant to Item 15(b) of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. A n n u a l R e p o r t ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY None. 53 Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. SIGNATURES Date: March 5, 2019 MicroVision, Inc. By /s/ Perry M. Mulligan Perry M. Mulligan Chief Executive Officer and Director Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the following capacities on March 5, 2019. Signature Title /s/ Perry M. Mulligan Perry M. Mulligan /s/ Stephen P. Holt Stephen P. Holt /s/ Simon Biddiscombe Simon Biddiscombe /s/ Robert P. Carlile Robert P. Carlile /s/ Yalon Farhi Yalon Farhi /s/ Slade Gorton Slade Gorton t r o p e R l a u n n A /s/ Bernee D.L. Strom Bernee D.L. Strom /s/ Brian V. Turner Brian V. Turner /s/ Thomas M. Walker Thomas M. Walker Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) Director Director Director Director Director Director Director 54 Corporate Information Board of Directors Simon Biddiscombe Chief Executive Officer, MobileIron Inc. Robert P. Carlile Retired Partner at KPMG LLP Yalon Farhi Slade Gorton Business Owner and Security Consultant Of Counsel, K&L Gates, LLP; Former U.S. Senator Perry M. Mulligan Chief Executive Officer, MicroVision Inc. Bernee D. L. Strom Chief Executive Officer and Chairman for Strom Group Brian Turner Former Chief Financial Officer, Coinstar, Inc. Thomas M. Walker Former Executive Vice President, MicroVision, Inc. Executive Officers Perry M. Mulligan Chief Executive Officer Stephen P. Holt Chief Financial Officer Sumit Sharma Chief Operating Officer David J. Westgor Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary Transfer Agent American Stock Transfer and Trust Company LLC 6201 15th Ave., Brooklyn, NY 11219 Shareholder Services P: 800-937-5449 Stock Listing MicroVision, Inc. common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the Symbol MVIS Investor Inquiries MicroVision, Inc. Attn: Investor Relations, 6244 185th Ave NE, Suite 100, Redmond, WA 98052 P: 425-936-6847 ir@microvision.com Corporate Counsel Ropes & Gray LLP Prudential Tower, 800 Boylston St., Boston, MA 02199-3600 Independent Accountants Moss Adams LLP 999 Third Avenue, Seattle, WA 98104-4019 ©2019 MicroVision, Inc. All rights reserved. The MicroVision logo, PicoP and SHOWWX are trademarks of MicroVision, Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. www.microvision.com MicroVision, Inc. 6244 185th Ave NE, Suite 100 Redmond, WA 98052 USA Tel 425.936.MVIS (6847) Fax 425-867-9992 

Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above