NORTHERN REGION
Corporate Headquarters
Millersburg
349 Union Street
Millersburg, PA 17061
717.692.2133
Operations Center
894 North River Road
Halifax, PA 17032
Dalmatia
132 School Road
Dalmatia, PA 17017
570.758.2711
Dauphin
1001 Peters Mountain Road
Dauphin, PA 17018
717.921.8899
Elizabethville
4642 State Route 209
Elizabethville, PA 17023
717.362.8147
Lykens
550 Main Street
Lykens, PA 17048
717.453.7185
Tower City
545 East Grand Avenue
Tower City, PA 17980
717.647.2157
CAPITAL REGION
Harrisburg
5500 Allentown Boulevard
Harrisburg, PA 17112
717.920.1772
Camp Hill
2101 Market Street
Camp Hill, PA 17011
717.920.0224
Harrisburg
4509 Derry Street
Harrisburg, PA 17111
717.558.2144
Administrative Center
4098 Derry Street
Harrisburg, PA 17111
Harrisburg
2615 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
717.233.7380
Harrisburg
17 North Second Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
717.920.1980
Mechanicsburg
4622 Carlisle Pike
Mechanicsburg, PA 17050
717.761.2480
Middletown
1100 Spring Garden Drive
Middletown, PA 17057
717.985.0100
Steelton
51 South Front Street
Steelton, PA 17113
717.939.1966
OUR MISSION
To be a long-term, viable community bank that offers
deposit and credit products to meet and exceed our
customers’ financial needs; provides a predictable
and consistent return on shareholders’ investment;
and offers employees a rewarding work experience.
www.midpennbank.com
2010 annual report to shareholders
he year 2010 was challenging for
all banks, including Mid Penn.
T
Asset quality continued to be the primary issue in
the banking industry. A stagnant economy, weak
loan demand, and heightened regulatory and
legislative burdens added to our challenges.
For Mid Penn, asset quality concerns center on
legacy issues in the loan portfolio. While we had
a much better year in 2010 in loan charge-offs than
in 2009, it was still a difficult year. There is room
for continued improvement in 2011, and we remain
diligent in proactively addressing issues in this area.
In July of 2010, the U. S. Government passed
the Dodd-Frank Act, which has the dual effect
of constraining already weakened income and
adding costs due to increased regulation. The
full effect of this act will not be known until all
of the provisions are fully implemented.
Despite the challenges facing our industry, Mid
Penn became stronger in 2010. Deposit growth
was robust at 11% year over year. That growth
allowed Mid Penn to build relationships that
will benefit us and our customers well into the
future. The strong deposit growth also enabled
Mid Penn to reduce its cost of funds and increase
net interest margin – our core earnings metric.
Earnings rebounded nicely as every quarter in
2010 was better than the comparable quarter of
2009, with earnings up over $5 million between
the two years! Based on 2010 earnings, we
declared a dividend in January for the first time
in five quarters, which hopefully will give all
of our investors the confidence that Mid Penn
Bancorp, Inc. remains a good investment.
Our 2010 successes were not limited to earnings. In
June of 2010, we were able to replace a challenging
retail location on Derry Street with one that addressed
these challenges. This affordable and highly visible
branch has received high praise from customers and
newcomers alike. The favorable response is illustrated
by deposit growth of 38%, since we relocated!
During 2010, we also managed to remodel many
products and services and introduce several others,
making all more appealing and affordable to
customers of any demographic. No “one size fits
all” mentality here. One of our enhanced service
lines is Trust and Wealth Management. While Mid
Penn has always provided these services, we have
made significant upgrades in what we do and
how we do it - upgrades we feel will position us for
strong growth and income in the immediate future.
We also introduced a revamped website to
make access to our new products and services
easier and more efficient for our customers. We
committed to providing a functional delivery
channel through our website, and we delivered
on that pledge. We will continue to upgrade the
website and all of our delivery channels in 2011,
making us more convenient to all customers.
Throughout 2010, we made enhancements to your
Mid Penn because we will never be content standing
still. Now, more than ever, successful banking
requires smart, calculated decisions with a long-term
view. We feel we have taken all the right steps to
appropriately position Mid Penn for ongoing success.
Looking ahead to 2011 gives me great confidence.
We will continue the charge to establish Mid Penn as
THE best bank in Central Pennsylvania. I hope you
join me in the optimism and energy that is apparent
in all that Mid Penn has accomplished during 2010.
I thank you for your ongoing interest in Mid Penn,
whether as a shareholder, customer, or both.
Rory G. Ritrievi
President and CEO
FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS as of and for the year ended December 31,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
2010
2009
Total Assets
Total Deposits
Net Loans and Leases
Total Investments and Interest Bearing
Time Deposits with Other Financial Institutions
Shareholders’ Equity
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common Shareholders
Earnings (Loss) Per Share (Basic)
Earnings (Loss) Per Share (Fully Diluted)
Cash Dividends
Book Value Per Common Share
Return on Average Shareholders’ Equity
Return on Average Assets
Net Interest Margin
Nonperforming Assets to Total Assets
$637,457
554,982
460,674
125,743
48,201
2,234
0.64
0.64
-
10.98
5.71%
0.44%
3.47%
3.16%
$606,010
500,015
472,699
85,949
46,704
(2,809)
(0.81)
(0.81)
0.52
10.55
-4.43%
-0.39%
3.42%
2.62%
Change
5.2%
11.0%
-2.5%
46.3%
3.2%
179.5%
179.0%
179.0%
-100.0%
4.1%
228.8%
212.8%
1.5%
20.6%
R E A SE 8 %
C
A L I N
U
N
A V E R A G E A N
$637.5
$606.0
$573.0
R E A SE 1 1 %
C
A L I N
U
N
A V E R A G E A N
$436.8
$555.0
$500.0
$509.8
$491.7
2009
2006
2008
2007
TOTAL ASSETS (in millions)
2010
$372.8
$364.2
2010
2009
2006
2007
2008
TOTAL DEPOSITS (in millions)
R E A SE 1 1 %
C
A L I N
U
N
A V E R A G E A N
$372.3
$354.4
$472.7 $460.7
$429.1
2010
2008
2009
NET LOANS & LEASES (in millions)
2007
2006
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-13677
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Pennsylvania
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
349 Union Street
Millersburg, Pennsylvania
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
25-1666413
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
17061
(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code 717.692.2133
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class
Common Stock, $1.00
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
The NASDAQ Stock Market, Inc.
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form
10-K.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to
be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See
definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One).
Large accelerated filer
Accelerated Filer
Non-accelerated Filer
Smaller Reporting Company
Indicated by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes
No
The aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the closing price of the
common equity of $9.14 per share, as reported by NASDAQ, on June 30, 2010, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal
quarter was approximately $31,805,189.
As of February 15, 2011, the registrant had 3,479,780 shares of common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s definitive proxy statement to be used in connection with the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders is incorporated herein by
reference in partial response to Part III, hereof.
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
PART I
Item 1 -
Business
Item 1A -
Risk Factors
Item 1B -
Unresolved Staff Comments
Item 2 -
Properties
Item 3 -
Legal Proceedings
Item 4 -
(Removed and Reserved)
PART II
Item 5 -
Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Shareholder Matters And Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
Item 6 -
Selected Financial Data
Item 7 -
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Item 7A -
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
Item 8 -
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Item 9 -
Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial
Disclosure
Item 9A -
Controls and Procedures
Item 9B -
Other Information
PART III
Item 10 -
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Item 11 -
Executive Compensation
Item 12 -
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related
Shareholder Matters
Item 13 -
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Item 14 -
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
PART IV
Item 15 -
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
Signatures
EXHIBITS
3
11
14
15
15
15
16
18
19
37
39
81
81
81
82
82
82
82
82
83
85
86
2
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
The disclosures set forth in this Item are qualified by the section captioned “Special Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements”
contained in Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this report and other
cautionary statements set forth elsewhere in this report.
Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.
Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. is a one-bank holding company, incorporated in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in August 1991. Mid Penn
Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries are collectively referred to herein as “Mid Penn” or the “Corporation.” On December 31, 1991,
Mid Penn acquired, as part of the holding company formation, all of the outstanding common stock of Mid Penn Bank, and the Bank became a
wholly owned subsidiary of Mid Penn. Mid Penn’s other wholly owned subsidiaries are Mid Penn Insurance Services, LLC, which provides a
range of personal and investment insurance products, and Mid Penn Investment Corporation, which engaged in investing activities. Mid Penn’s
primary business is to supervise and coordinate the business of its subsidiaries and to provide them with capital and resources.
A decision was made to close the Mid Penn Investment Corporation, effective August 31, 2010 due to lack of activity within the subsidiary.
Mid Penn Insurance Services, LLC provides title insurance. Due to the lack of activity within this subsidiary, the decision was made to exit this
line of business effective December 31, 2009.
Mid Penn’s consolidated financial condition and results of operations consist almost entirely of that of Mid Penn Bank, which is managed as a
single business segment. At December 31, 2010, Mid Penn had total consolidated assets of $637,457,000, total deposits of $554,982,000, and
total shareholders’ equity of $48,201,000.
As of December 31, 2010, Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. did not own or lease any properties. Mid Penn Bank owns the banking offices as identified
in Item 2.
All Mid Penn employees are employed by Mid Penn Bank. At December 31, 2010, the Bank had 158 full-time and 26 part-time employees. The
Bank and its employees are not subject to a collective bargaining agreement, and the Bank believes it enjoys good relations with its personnel.
Mid Penn Bank
Millersburg Bank, the predecessor to Mid Penn Bank (the “Bank”), was organized in 1868, and became a state chartered bank in 1931, obtaining
trust powers in 1935, at which time its name was changed to Millersburg Trust Company. In 1962, the Lykens Valley Bank merged with and
into Millersburg Trust Company. In 1971, Farmer’s State Bank of Dalmatia merged with Millersburg Trust Company and the resulting entity
adopted the name “Mid Penn Bank.” In 1985, the Bank acquired Tower City National Bank. In 1998, Mid Penn acquired Miners Bank of
Lykens, which was merged into Mid Penn Bank. The Pennsylvania Department of Banking and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
supervise the Bank. Mid Penn’s and the Bank’s legal headquarters are located at 349 Union Street, Millersburg, Pennsylvania 17061. The Bank
presently has 14 offices located in Dauphin, Northumberland, Schuylkill, and Cumberland Counties, Pennsylvania.
Mid Penn’s primary business consists of attracting deposits from its network of community banking offices operated by the Bank. The Bank
engages in full-service commercial banking and trust business, making available to the community a wide range of financial services, including,
but not limited to, installment loans, personal loans, mortgage and home equity loans, secured and unsecured commercial and consumer loans,
lines of credit, construction financing, farm loans, community development and local government loans and various types of time and demand
deposits. Deposits of the Bank are insured by the Bank Insurance Fund of the FDIC to the maximum extent provided by law. In addition, the
Bank provides a full range of trust services through its Trust Department. The Bank also offers other services such as Internet banking,
telephone banking, cash management services, automated teller services and safe deposit boxes.
Business Strategy
The Bank engages in a full-service commercial banking and trust business, making available to the community a wide range of financial
services. These services are provided to small and middle-market businesses, high net worth individuals, and retail consumers through 14 full
service banking facilities. The Bank seeks to develop long-term customer relationships, maintain high quality service and provide quick
responses to customer needs. Mid Penn believes that an emphasis on local relationship building, together with its conservative approach to
lending, are important factors in the success and growth of Mid Penn.
The Bank seeks credit opportunities of good quality within its target market that exhibit positive historical trends, stable cash flows and
secondary sources of repayment from tangible collateral. The Bank extends credit for the purpose of obtaining and continuing long-term
relationships. Lenders are provided with detailed underwriting policies for all types of credit risks accepted by the Bank and must obtain
appropriate approvals for credit extensions in excess of conservatively assigned lending limits. The Bank also maintains strict documentation
3
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
requirements and extensive credit quality assurance practices in order to identify credit portfolio weaknesses as early as possible so any
exposures that are discovered might be reduced.
Lending Activities
The Bank offers a variety of loan products to its customers, including loans secured by real estate, commercial and consumer loans. The Bank’s
lending objectives are as follows:
•
•
to establish a diversified commercial loan portfolio; and
to provide a satisfactory return to Mid Penn’s shareholders by properly pricing loans to include the cost of funds, administrative costs,
bad debts, local economic conditions, competition, customer relationships, the term of the loan, credit risk, collateral quality and a
reasonable profit margin.
Credit risk is managed through portfolio diversification, underwriting policies and procedures and loan monitoring practices. The Bank
generally secures its loans with real estate with such collateral values dependent and subject to change based on real estate market conditions
within its market area. As of December 31, 2010, the Bank’s highest concentration of credit is in Commercial Real Estate. Most of the Bank’s
business activity with customers was located in Central Pennsylvania, specifically in Dauphin, lower Northumberland, western Schuylkill, and
eastern Cumberland Counties.
Investment Activities
Mid Penn’s investment portfolio is used to improve earnings through investments of funds in higher-yielding assets, while maintaining asset
quality, which provides the necessary balance sheet liquidity for Mid Penn. Mid Penn does not have any significant concentrations within
investment securities.
Mid Penn’s entire portfolio of investment securities is considered available for sale. As such, the investments are recorded on the balance sheet
at fair value. Mid Penn’s investments include US Treasury, agency and municipal securities that are given a market price relative to investments
of the same type with similar maturity dates. As the interest rate environment changes, Mid Penn’s fair value of existing securities will change.
This difference in value, or unrealized gain, amounted to $266,000, as of December 31, 2010. A majority of the investments are high quality
United States and municipal securities that, if held to maturity, are expected to result in no loss to the Bank.
For additional information with respect to Mid Penn’s business activities, see Part II, Item 7 of this report, which is incorporated herein by
reference.
Sources of Funds
The Bank primarily uses deposits and borrowings to finance lending and investment activities. Borrowing sources include advances from the
Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh, reverse repurchase agreements with investment banks and overnight borrowings from the Bank’s
customers and correspondent bank. All borrowings, except for the line of credit with the Bank’s correspondent bank, require collateral in the
form of loans or securities. Collateral levels, therefore, limit borrowings and the available lines of credit extended by the Bank’s creditors. As a
result, deposits remain key to the future funding and growth of the business. Deposit growth within the banking industry has been subject to
strong competition from a variety of financial services companies. This competition may require financial institutions to adjust their product
offerings and pricing to adequately grow deposits.
Competition
The banking business is highly competitive, and the profitability of Mid Penn depends principally upon the Bank’s ability to compete in its
market area. The Bank actively competes with other financial services companies for deposit, loan, and trust business. Competitors include other
commercial banks, savings banks, savings and loan associations, insurance companies, securities brokerage firms, credit unions, finance
companies, mutual funds, and money market funds. Financial institutions compete primarily on the quality of services rendered, interest rates on
loans and deposits, service charges, the convenience of banking facilities, location and hours of operation and, in the case of loans to larger
commercial borrowers, relative lending limits.
Many competitors are significantly larger than the Bank and have significantly greater financial resources, personnel and locations from which
to conduct business. In addition, the Bank is subject to banking regulations while certain competitors may not be. There are relatively few
barriers for companies wanting to enter into the financial services industry. For more information, see the “Supervision and Regulation” section
below.
Mid Penn has been able to compete effectively with other financial institutions by emphasizing customer service. Mid Penn’s customer service
model is based on convenient hours, efficient and friendly employees, local decision making, and quality products. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley
Act (see discussion below), which breaks down many barriers between the banking, securities and insurance industries, may significantly affect
the competitive environment in which Mid Penn operates.
4
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
The growth of mutual funds over the past two decades has made it increasingly difficult for financial institutions to attract deposits. The
continued flow of cash into mutual funds, much of which is made through tax deferred investment vehicles such as 401(k) plans, and a generally
strong economy, have, until recently, fueled high returns for these investments, in particular, certain equity funds. The recent economic turmoil
has negatively impacted the returns on many of these investments and impacted the manner in which investors distribute their funds across
investment alternatives. The safety of traditional bank products has recently become an attractive option during this period of market volatility.
Mid Penn’s ability to attract funds in the future will be impacted by the public’s appetite for the safety of insured or local investments versus the
returns offered by alternative choices as part of their personal investment mix.
Mid Penn’s success is dependent to a significant degree on economic conditions in Central Pennsylvania, especially in Dauphin, lower
Northumberland, western Schuylkill and eastern Cumberland Counties, which Mid Penn defines as our primary market. The banking industry is
affected by general economic conditions including the effects of inflation, recession, unemployment, real estate values, trends in the national
and global economics, and other factors beyond our control. An economic recession or a delayed recovery over a prolonged period of time in the
Central Pennsylvania area could cause an increase in the level of the Bank’s non-performing assets and loan and lease losses, thereby causing
operating losses, impairing liquidity and eroding capital. Mid Penn cannot assure you that adverse changes in the local economy would not have
a material adverse effect on Mid Penn’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.
Supervision and Regulation
General
Bank holding companies and banks are extensively regulated under both Federal and state laws. The regulation and supervision of Mid Penn and
the Bank are designed primarily for the protection of depositors, the Deposit Insurance Fund, and the monetary system, and not Mid Penn or its
shareholders. Enforcement actions may include the imposition of a conservator or receiver, cease-and-desist orders and written agreements, the
termination of insurance on deposits, the imposition of civil money penalties and removal and prohibition orders. If a banking regulator takes
any enforcement action, the value of an equity investment in Mid Penn could be substantially reduced or eliminated.
Federal and state banking laws contain numerous provisions affecting various aspects of the business and operations of Mid Penn and the Bank.
Mid Penn is subject to, among others, the regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Reserve Board, and the Bank
is subject to, among others, the regulations of the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
(“FDIC”). The following descriptions of and references to applicable statutes and regulations are not intended to be complete descriptions of
these provisions or their effects on Mid Penn or the Bank. They are summaries only and are qualified in their entirety by reference to such
statutes and regulations.
Holding Company Regulation
Mid Penn is a registered bank holding company subject to supervision and regulation by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
(the “Federal Reserve”). As such, it is subject to the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (“BHCA”) and many of the Federal Reserve’s
regulations promulgated thereunder. The Federal Reserve has broad enforcement powers over bank holding companies, including the power to
impose substantial fines and civil penalties.
The BHCA requires Mid Penn to file an annual report with the Federal Reserve regarding the holding company and its subsidiary bank. The
Federal Reserve Board also makes examinations of the holding company. The Bank is not a member of the Federal Reserve System; however,
the Federal Reserve possesses cease-and-desist powers over bank holding companies and their subsidiaries where their actions would constitute
an unsafe or unsound practice or violation of law. The Federal Reserve Board also makes policy that guides the declaration and distribution of
dividends by bank holding companies.
The BHCA restricts a bank holding company’s ability to acquire control of additional banks. In addition, the BHCA restricts the activities in
which bank holding companies may engage directly or through non-bank subsidiaries.
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Modernization Act
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (“GLB”) became effective on March 11, 2000. The primary purpose of GLB was to eliminate barriers between
investment banking and commercial banking and to permit, within certain limitations, the affiliation of financial service providers. Generally,
GLB:
•
repealed the historical restrictions against, and eliminated many federal and state law barriers to affiliations among banks, securities
firms, insurance companies and other financial service providers;
provided a uniform framework for the activities of banks, savings institutions and their holding companies;
broadened the activities that may be conducted by and through national banks and other banking subsidiaries of bank holding
companies;
provided an enhanced framework for protecting the privacy of consumers’ information;
•
•
•
5
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
•
adopted a number of provisions related to the capitalization, membership, corporate governance and other measures designed to
modernize the Federal Home Loan Bank System;
• modified the laws governing the implementation of the Community Reinvestment Act; and
•
addressed a variety of other legal and regulatory issues affecting both day-to-day operations and long-term activities of financial
institutions.
More specifically, under GLB, bank holding companies, such as Mid Penn, that meet certain management, capital, and Community
Reinvestment Act standards, are permitted to become financial holding companies and, by doing so, to affiliate with securities firms and
insurance companies and to engage in other activities that are financial in nature, incidental to such financial activities, or complementary to
such activities. A bank holding company may become a financial holding company if each of its subsidiary banks is well capitalized under the
FDIC Improvement Act’s prompt corrective action provisions, is well managed and has at least a satisfactory rating under the Community
Reinvestment Act. The required filing is a declaration that the bank holding company wishes to become a financial holding company and meets
all applicable requirements. Mid Penn has not elected to become a financial holding company at this time.
No prior regulatory approval will be required for a financial holding company to acquire a company, other than a bank or savings association,
engaged in activities permitted under GLB. Activities cited by GLB as being financial in nature include:
securities underwriting, dealing and market making;
sponsoring mutual funds and investment companies;
insurance underwriting and agency;
•
•
•
• merchant banking activities; and
•
activities that the Federal Reserve has determined to be closely related to banking.
In addition to permitting financial services providers to enter into new lines of business, the law allows firms the freedom to streamline existing
operations and to potentially reduce costs. The Act may increase both opportunity as well as competition. Many community banks are less able
to devote the capital and management resources needed to facilitate broad expansion of financial services including insurance and brokerage
services.
Corporate Governance
On July 30, 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 was enacted. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act represents a comprehensive revision of laws affecting
corporate governance, auditor independence and accounting standards, executive compensation, insider loans, whistleblower protection, and
enhanced and timely disclosure of corporate information. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act is applicable to all companies with equity securities
registered or that file reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. In particular, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act established:
•
•
•
•
•
new requirements for audit committees, including independence, expertise and responsibilities;
additional responsibilities regarding financial statements for the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the reporting
company;
new standards for auditors and regulation of audits;
increased disclosure and reporting obligations for the reporting company and its directors and executive officers; and
new and increased civil and criminal penalties for violations of the securities laws.
The SEC and NASDAQ have adopted numerous rules implementing the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act that affect Mid Penn. The
changes are intended to allow shareholders to monitor more effectively the performance of companies and management.
Bank Regulation
The Bank, a Pennsylvania-chartered institution, is subject to supervision, regulation and examination by the Pennsylvania Department of
Banking and the FDIC. The deposits of the Bank are insured by the FDIC to the extent provided by law. The FDIC assesses deposit insurance
premiums the amount of which may, in the future, depend in part on the condition of the Bank. Moreover, the FDIC may terminate deposit
insurance of the Bank under certain circumstances. The Bank regulatory agencies have broad enforcement powers over depository institutions
under their jurisdiction, including the power to terminate deposit insurance, to impose fines and other civil and criminal penalties, and to appoint
a conservator or receiver if any of a number of conditions is met. In addition, the Bank is subject to a variety of local, state and federal laws that
affect its operations.
Banking regulations include, but are not limited to, permissible types and amounts of loans, investments and other activities, capital adequacy,
branching, interest rates on loans and the safety and soundness of banking practices.
Capital Requirements
Under risk-based capital requirements for bank holding companies, Mid Penn is required to maintain a minimum ratio of total capital to risk-
weighted assets (including certain off-balance-sheet activities, such as standby letters of credit) of eight percent. At least half of the total capital
is to be composed of common equity, retained earnings and qualifying perpetual preferred stock, less goodwill (“Tier 1 Capital” and together
6
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
with Tier 2 Capital, Total Capital”). The remainder may consist of subordinated debt, non-qualifying preferred stock and a limited amount of the
loan loss allowance (“Tier 2 Capital”).
In addition, the Federal Reserve Board has established minimum leverage ratio requirements for bank holding companies. These requirements
provide for a minimum leverage ratio of Tier 1 Capital to adjusted average quarterly assets (“leverage ratio”) equal to 3% for bank holding
companies that meet certain specified criteria, including having the highest regulatory rating. All other bank holding companies will generally
be required to maintain a leverage ratio of at least 4-5%. The requirements also provide that bank holding companies experiencing internal
growth or making acquisitions will be expected to maintain strong capital positions substantially above the minimum supervisory levels without
significant reliance on intangible assets. Furthermore, the requirements indicate that the Federal Reserve Board will continue to consider a
“Tangible Tier 1 Leverage Ratio” (deducting all intangibles) in evaluating proposals for expansion or new activity. The Federal Reserve Board
has not advised Mid Penn of any specific minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio.
The Bank is subject to similar capital requirements adopted by the FDIC. The FDIC has not advised the Bank of any specific minimum leverage
ratios.
The capital ratios of Mid Penn and the Bank are described in Note 17 to Mid Penn’s Consolidated Financial Statements, which are incorporated
herein by reference.
Banking regulators continue to indicate their desire to further develop capital requirements applicable to banking organizations. Changes to
capital requirements could materially affect the profitability of Mid Penn or the fair value of Mid Penn stock.
FDIC Improvement Act
As a result of the FDIC Improvement Act of 1991, banks are subject to increased reporting requirements and more frequent examinations by the
bank regulatory agencies. The agencies also have the authority to dictate certain key decisions that formerly were left to management, including
compensation standards, loan underwriting standards, asset growth, and payment of dividends. Failure to comply with these standards, or failure
to maintain capital above specified levels set by the regulators, could lead to the imposition of penalties or the forced resignation of
management. If a bank becomes critically undercapitalized, the banking agencies have the authority to place an institution into receivership.
Safety and Soundness Standards
Pursuant to FDICIA, the federal banking regulatory agencies have adopted a set of guidelines prescribing safety and soundness standards for
depository institutions such as the Bank. The guidelines establish general standards relating to internal controls and information systems,
internal audit systems, loan documentation, credit underwriting, interest rate exposure, asset growth, asset quality, earnings and compensation,
fees and benefits. In general, the guidelines require, among other things, appropriate systems and practices to identify and manage the risks and
exposures specified in the guidelines. The guidelines prohibit excessive compensation as an unsafe and unsound practice and describe
compensation as excessive when the amounts paid are unreasonable or disproportionate to the services performed by an executive officer,
employee, director or principal shareholder. In addition, the agencies adopted regulations that authorize an agency to order an institution that has
been given notice by an agency that it is not satisfying any of such safety and soundness standards to submit a compliance plan. If the institution
fails to submit an acceptable compliance plan or fails to implement an accepted plan, the agency must issue an order directing action to correct
the deficiency and may issue an order directing other actions be taken, including restricting asset growth, restricting interest rates paid on
deposits, and requiring an increase in the institution’s ratio of tangible equity to assets.
Payment of Dividends and Other Restrictions
Mid Penn is a legal entity separate and distinct from its subsidiary, the Bank. There are various legal and regulatory limitations on the extent to
which the Bank can, among other things, finance, or otherwise supply funds to, Mid Penn. Specifically, dividends from the Bank are the
principal source of Mid Penn’s cash funds and there are certain legal restrictions under Pennsylvania law and Pennsylvania banking regulations
on the payment of dividends by state-chartered banks. The relevant regulatory agencies also have authority to prohibit Mid Penn and the Bank
from engaging in what, in the opinion of such regulatory body, constitutes an unsafe or unsound banking practice. The payment of dividends
could, depending upon the financial condition of Mid Penn and the Bank, be deemed to constitute such an unsafe or unsound practice. Further,
under the terms of the Capital Purchase Program (“CPP”), Mid Penn is restricted from increasing its dividends on its common stock above the
last per share quarterly dividend declared prior to October 14, 2008 ($0.20 per share) without permission as long as the CPP preferred stock is
outstanding.
Prompt Corrective Action
In addition to the required minimum capital levels described above, federal law establishes a system of “prompt corrective actions” which
Federal banking agencies are required to take, and certain actions which they have discretion to take, based upon the capital category into which
a federally regulated depository institution falls. Regulations set forth detailed procedures and criteria for implementing prompt corrective action
in the case of any institution, which is not adequately capitalized. Under the rules, an institution will be deemed to be “adequately capitalized” if
it exceeds the minimum Federal regulatory capital requirements. However, it will be deemed “undercapitalized” if it fails to meet the minimum
7
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
capital requirements, “significantly undercapitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio that is less than 6.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital
ratio that is less than 3.0%, or a leverage ratio that is less than 3.0%, and “critically undercapitalized” if the institution has a ratio of tangible
equity to total assets that is equal to or less than 2.0%.
The prompt corrective action rules require an undercapitalized institution to file a written capital restoration plan, along with a performance
guaranty by its holding company or a third party. In addition, an undercapitalized institution becomes subject to certain automatic restrictions
including a prohibition on payment of dividends, a limitation on asset growth and expansion, in certain cases, a limitation on the payment of
bonuses or raises to senior executive officers, and a prohibition on the payment of certain “management fees” to any “controlling person”.
Institutions that are classified as undercapitalized are also subject to certain additional supervisory actions, including increased reporting burdens
and regulatory monitoring, a limitation on the institution’s ability to make acquisitions, open new branch offices, or engage in new lines of
business, obligations to raise additional capital, restrictions on transactions with affiliates, and restrictions on interest rates paid by the institution
on deposits. In certain cases, bank regulatory agencies may require replacement of senior executive officers or directors, or sale of the institution
to a willing purchaser. If an institution is deemed “critically undercapitalized” and continues in that category for four quarters, the statute
requires, with certain narrowly limited exceptions, that the institution be placed in receivership.
Deposit Insurance
The FDIC insures deposits of the Bank through the Deposit Insurance Fund (“DIF”). The FDIC maintains the DIF by assessing depository
institutions an insurance premium. The amount each institution is assessed is based upon a variety of factors that include the balance of insured
deposits as well as the degree of risk the institution poses to the insurance fund. The FDIC recently increased the amount of deposits it insures
from $100,000 to $250,000. The Bank pays an insurance premium into the DIF based on the quarterly average daily deposit liabilities net of
certain exclusions. The FDIC uses a risk-based premium system that assesses higher rates on those institutions that pose greater risks to the DIF.
The FDIC places each institution in one of four risk categories using a two-step process based first on capital ratios (the capital group
assignment) and then on other relevant information (the supervisory group assignment). Subsequently, the rate for each institution within a risk
category may be adjusted depending upon different factors that either enhance or reduce the risk the institution poses to the DIF, including the
unsecured debt, secured liabilities and brokered deposits related to each institution. Finally, certain risk multipliers may be applied to the
adjusted assessment. In 2009, the FDIC increased the amount assessed from financial institutions by increasing its risk-based deposit insurance
assessment scale. The quarterly annualized assessment scale for 2009 ranged from twelve basis points of assessable deposits for the strongest
institutions to 77.5 basis points for the weakest. In 2009, the FDIC also adopted a uniform special assessment rate for all institutions not to
exceed 10 basis points on the individual bank’s assessment base. The total amount paid by the Bank for FDIC insurance for the year ended
December 31, 2009 under these provisions was $1,163,000.
On November 12, 2009, the FDIC approved a rule to require insured institutions to prepay their estimated quarterly risk-based assessments for
the fourth quarter of 2009, and for all of 2010, 2011, and 2012. An insured institution’s risk-based deposit insurance assessments will continue
to be calculated on a quarterly basis, but will be paid from the amount the institution prepaid until the later of the date that amount is exhausted
or June 30, 2013, at which point any remaining funds would be returned to the insured institution. Consequently, Mid Penn’s prepayment of DIF
premiums made in December 2009 resulted in a prepaid asset of $2,719,000 at December 31, 2009. At December 31, 2010 the prepaid asset
was $1,878,000.
Beginning with the second quarter of 2011, as mandated by the recently enacted Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
(the “Dodd-Frank Act”), the assessment base that the FDIC will use to calculate assessment premiums will be a bank’s average assets minus
average tangible equity. As the asset base of the banking industry is larger than the deposit base, the range of assessment rates will change to a
low of 2.5 basis points through a high of 45 basis points, per $100 of assets; however, the dollar amount of total actual premiums is expected to
be roughly the same.
The FDIC is required under the Dodd-Frank Act to establish assessment rates that will allow the Deposit Insurance Fund to achieve a reserve
ratio of 1.35% of Insurance Fund insured deposits by September 2020. In addition, the FDIC has established a “designated reserve ratio” of
2.0%, a target ratio that, until it is achieved, will not likely result in the FDIC reducing assessment rates. In attempting to achieve the mandated
1.35% ratio, the FDIC is required to implement assessment formulas that charge banks over $10 billion in asset size more than banks under that
size. Those new formulas begin in the second quarter of 2011, but do not affect the Bank. Under the Dodd-Fank Act, the FDIC is authorized to
make reimbursements from the insurance fund to banks if the reserve ratio exceeds 1.50%, but the FDIC has adopted the “designated reserve
ratio” of 2.0% and has announced that any reimbursements from the fund are indefinitely suspended.
Environmental Laws
Management does not anticipate that compliance with environmental laws and regulations will have any material effect on Mid Penn’s capital,
expenditures, earnings, or competitive position. However, environmentally related hazards have become a source of high risk and potentially
unlimited liability for financial institutions.
In 1995, the Pennsylvania General Assembly enacted the Economic Development Agency, Fiduciary and Lender Environmental Liability
Protection Act, which among other things, provides protection to lenders from environmental liability and remediation costs under the
environmental laws for releases and contamination caused by others. A lender who engages in activities involved in the routine practices of
8
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
commercial lending, including, but not limited to, the providing of financial services, holding of security interests, workout practices,
foreclosure or the recovery of funds from the sale of property shall not be liable under the environmental acts or common law equivalents to the
Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Resources or to any other person by virtue of the fact that the lender engages in such commercial
lending practice. A lender, however, will be liable if it, its employees or agents, directly cause an immediate release or directly exacerbate a
release of regulated substance on or from the property, or known and willfully compelled the borrower to commit an action which caused such
release or violate an environmental act. The Economic Development Agency, Fiduciary and Lender Environmental Liability Protection Act does
not limit federal liability which still exists under certain circumstances.
Consumer Protection Laws
A number of laws govern the relationship between the Bank and its customers. For example, the Community Reinvestment Act is designed to
encourage lending by banks to persons in low and moderate income areas. The Home Mortgage Disclosure Act and the Equal Credit
Opportunity Act attempt to minimize lending decisions based on impermissible criteria, such as race or gender. The Truth-in-Lending Act and
the Truth-in-Savings Act require banks to provide certain disclosure of relevant terms related to loans and savings accounts, respectively. Anti-
tying restrictions (which prohibit conditioning the availability or terms of credit on the purchase of another banking product) further restrict the
Bank’s relationships with its customers.
Privacy Laws
In 2000, the federal banking regulators issued final regulations implementing certain provisions of GLB governing the privacy of consumer
financial information. The regulations limit the disclosure by financial institutions, such as Mid Penn and the Bank, of nonpublic personal
information about individuals who obtain financial products or services for personal, family, or household purposes. Subject to certain
exceptions allowed by law, the regulations cover information sharing between financial institutions and nonaffiliated third parties. More
specifically, the regulations require financial institutions to:
•
•
•
provide initial notices to customers about their privacy policies, describing the conditions under which they may disclose nonpublic
personal financial information to nonaffiliated third parties and affiliates;
provide annual notices of their privacy policies to their current customers; and
provide a reasonable method for consumers to “opt out” of disclosures to nonaffiliated third parties.
Protection of Customer Information
In 2001, the federal banking regulators issued final regulations implementing the provisions of GLB relating to the protection of customer
information. The regulations, applicable to Mid Penn and the Bank, relate to administrative, technical, and physical safeguards for customer
records and information. These safeguards are intended to:
•
•
•
insure the security and confidentiality of customer records and information;
protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to the security or integrity of such records; and
protect against unauthorized access to or use of such records or information that could result in substantial harm or inconvenience to
any customer.
Affiliate Transactions
Transactions between Mid Penn and the Bank and its affiliates are governed by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act. An “affiliate”
of a bank or savings institution is any company or entity that controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the bank or savings
institution. Generally, a subsidiary of a depository institution that is not also a depository institution is not treated as an affiliate of the bank for
purposes of Sections 23A and 23B. Sections 23A and 23B are intended to protect insured depository institutions from suffering losses arising
from transactions with non-insured affiliates, by limiting the extent to which a bank or its subsidiaries may engage in covered transactions with
any one affiliate and with all affiliates of the bank in the aggregate, and requiring that such transactions be on terms that are consistent with safe
and sound banking practices.
Effective April 1, 2003, Regulation W of the Federal Reserve comprehensively amended Sections 23A and 23B. The regulation unifies and
updates staff interpretations issued over the years, incorporates several new interpretative proposals (such as to clarify when transactions with an
unrelated third party will be attributed to an affiliate), and addresses new issues arising as a result of the expanded scope of non-banking
activities engaged in by bank and bank holding companies in recent years and authorized for financial holding companies under the GLB.
The USA Patriot Act
In 2001, the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001
(USA Patriot Act) was signed into law. The USA Patriot Act broadened the application of anti-money laundering regulations to apply to
additional types of financial institutions, such as broker-dealers, and strengthened the ability of the U.S. government to detect and prosecute
international money laundering and the financing of terrorism. The principal provisions of Title III of the USA Patriot Act require that regulated
financial institutions, including state-chartered banks:
•
establish an anti-money laundering program that includes training and audit components;
9
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
•
•
•
comply with regulations regarding the verification of the identity of any person seeking to open an account;
take additional required precautions with non-U.S. owned accounts; and
perform certain verification and certification of money laundering risk for their foreign correspondent banking relationships.
The USA Patriot Act also expanded the conditions under which funds in a U.S. interbank account may be subject to forfeiture and increased the
penalties for violation of anti-money laundering regulations. Failure of a financial institution to comply with the USA Patriot Acts requirements
could have serious legal and reputational consequences for the institution. The Bank has adopted policies, procedures and controls to address
compliance with the requirements of the USA Patriot Act under the existing regulations and will continue to revise and update its policies,
procedures and controls to reflect changes required by the USA Patriot Act and implementing regulations.
Anti-Money Laundering and Anti-Terrorism Financing
Under Title III of the USA PATRIOT Act, also known as the International Money Laundering Abatement and Anti-Terrorism Financing Act of
2001, all financial institutions, including Mid Penn and the Bank, are required in general to identify their customers, adopt formal and
comprehensive anti-money laundering programs, scrutinize or prohibit altogether certain transactions of special concern, and be prepared to
respond to inquiries from U.S. law enforcement agencies concerning their customers and their transactions. Additional information-sharing
among financial institutions, regulators, and law enforcement authorities is encouraged by the presence of an exemption from the privacy
provisions of the GLB Act for financial institutions that comply with this provision and the authorization of the Secretary of the Treasury to
adopt rules to further encourage cooperation and information-sharing. The effectiveness of a financial institution in combating money-
laundering activities is a factor to be considered in any application submitted by the financial institution under the Bank Merger Act, which
applies to the Bank.
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 and Related Programs
Mid Penn is subject to the rules and regulations promulgated under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (“EESA”) and related
legislation as a result of its sale of preferred stock to the U.S. Treasury under the U.S. Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program (“CPP”). Additional
information relating to the CPP, including restrictions on dividends and redemptions of common stock, is included in the information set forth in
Item 7 of this report under the caption, “Capital Purchase Program Participation.” Furthermore, under rules and regulations of EESA to which
the Mid Penn is subject, no dividends may be declared or paid on Mid Penn’s common stock and Mid Penn may not repurchase or redeem any
common stock unless dividends then due and payable with respect to Treasury’s preferred stock have been paid in full. Moreover, the consent
of Treasury would be required for any increase in the per share dividend amount on the common stock beyond the per share dividend declared
immediately prior to October 14, 2008 ($0.20 per share per quarter) until the third anniversary of the date of Treasury’s investment, unless prior
to the third anniversary, Treasury’s preferred stock is redeemed in whole or Treasury has transferred all of its preferred shares to third parties.
Because of Mid Penn’s participation in the CPP, Mid Penn is subject to certain restrictions on its executive compensation practices, which are
discussed in Item 7 of this report under the caption, “Capital Purchase Program Participation.”
Effects of Government Policy and Potential Changes in Regulation
Changes in regulations applicable to Mid Penn or the Bank, or shifts in monetary or other government policies, could have a material affect on
our business. Mid Penn’s and the Bank’s business is also affected by the state of the financial services industry in general. As a result of legal
and industry changes, management believes that the industry will continue to experience an increased rate of change as the financial services
industry strives for greater product offerings, market share and economies of scale.
From time to time, legislation is enacted that has the effect of increasing the cost of doing business, limiting or expanding permissible activities
or affecting the competitive balance between banks and other financial institutions. Proposals to change the laws and regulations governing the
operations and taxation of banks, bank holding companies and other financial institutions are frequently made in Congress, and before various
bank regulatory agencies. Mid Penn cannot predict the likelihood of any major changes or the impact such changes might have on Mid Penn
and/or the Bank. Various congressional bills and other proposals have proposed a sweeping overhaul of the banking system, including
provisions for: limitations on deposit insurance coverage; changing the timing and method financial institutions use to pay for deposit insurance;
expanding the power of banks by removing the restrictions on bank underwriting activities; and tightening the regulation of bank derivatives
activities; and allowing commercial enterprises to own banks.
Mid Penn’s earnings are, and will be affected by domestic economic conditions and the monetary and fiscal policies of the United States
government and its agencies. The monetary policies of the Federal Reserve have had, and will likely continue to have, an impact on the
operating results of commercial banks because of the Federal Reserve’s power to implement national monetary policy to, among other things,
curb inflation or combat recession. The Federal Reserve has a major impact on the levels of bank loans, investments and deposits through its
open market operations in United States government securities and through its regulation of, among other things, the discount rate on
borrowings of member banks and the reserve requirements against member bank deposits. It is not possible to predict the nature and impact of
future changes in monetary and fiscal policies.
From time to time, various types of federal and state legislation have been proposed that could result in additional regulation of, and restrictions
on, the business of Mid Penn and the Bank. As a consequence of the extensive regulation of commercial banking activities in the United States,
10
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
the Bank’s business is particularly susceptible to being affected by federal legislation and regulations that may increase the costs of doing
business. Congress is currently debating major legislation that may fundamentally change the regulatory oversight of banking institutions in the
United States. Whether any legislation will be enacted or additional regulations will be adopted, and how they might impact Mid Penn cannot
be determined at this time.
Recent Legislation Affecting the Financial Services Industry
The Dodd-Frank Act, which became law in July 2010, significantly changes regulation of financial institutions and the financial services
industry, including: creating a Financial Services Oversight Council to identify emerging systemic risks and improve interagency cooperation;
centralizing responsibility for consumer financial protection by creating a new agency, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which will be
responsible for implementing, examining and enforcing compliance with federal consumer financial laws; permanently raising the current
standard maximum deposit insurance amount to $250,000; establishing strengthened capital standards for banks, and disallowing certain trust
preferred securities from qualifying as Tier 1 capital (subject to certain grandfather provisions for existing trust preferred securities);
establishing new minimum mortgage underwriting standards; granting the Federal Reserve Board the power to regulate debit card interchange
fees; and implementing corporate governance changes. Many aspects of the Dodd-Frank Act are subject to rulemaking that will take effect over
several years, thus making it difficult to assess the impact of the statute on the financial industry, including Mid Penn, at this time.
It is difficult to predict at this time the specific impact the Dodd-Frank Act and the yet to be written implementing rules and regulations will
have on community banks. Given the uncertainty associated with the manner in which the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act will be
implemented by the various regulatory agencies and through regulations, the full extent of the impact such requirements will have on financial
institutions’ operations is presently unclear. The changes resulting from the Dodd-Frank Act may impact the profitability of our business
activities, require changes to certain of our business practices, impose upon us more stringent capital, liquidity and leverage ratio requirements
or otherwise adversely affect our business. These changes may also require us to invest significant management attention and resources to
evaluate and make necessary changes in order to comply with new statutory and regulatory requirements.
Available Information
Mid Penn’s common stock is registered under Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and is traded on the NASDAQ Stock
Market under the trading symbol MPB. Mid Penn is subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act, and, accordingly, files
reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The reports, proxy statements and other
information filed with the SEC are available for inspection and copying at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Room 1580,
Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at (202) 551-8090.
Mid Penn is an electronic filer with the SEC. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and
other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The SEC’s Internet site address is www.sec.gov.
Mid Penn’s headquarters are located at 349 Union Street, Millersburg, Pennsylvania 17061, and its telephone number is (717) 692-2133. Mid
Penn’s Internet address is www.midpennbank.com. Mid Penn makes available through its website, free of charge, its annual report on Form 10-
K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after filing
with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Mid Penn has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all employees. This document is also
available on Mid Penn’s website. The information included on our website is not a part of this document.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Future dividend payments and common stock repurchases are restricted by the terms of the U.S. Treasury's equity investment in Mid Penn
Under the terms of the CPP, for so long as any preferred stock issued under the CPP remains outstanding, Mid Penn is prohibited from
increasing dividends to holders of its common stock above the last per share quarterly amount in effect immediately prior to October 14, 2008
($0.20 per share), and from making certain repurchases of equity securities, including our common stock, without the U.S. Treasury's consent
until the third anniversary of the U.S. Treasury's investment or until the U.S. Treasury has transferred all of the preferred stock it purchased
under the CPP to third parties. As long as the preferred stock issued to the U.S. Treasury is outstanding, dividend payments and repurchases or
redemptions relating to certain equity securities, including Mid Penn’s common stock, are prohibited until all accrued and unpaid dividends are
paid on such preferred stock, subject to certain limited exceptions.
Mid Penn is subject to interest rate risk
Mid Penn’s earnings and cash flows are largely dependent upon its net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest
income earned on interest-earning assets such as loans and securities and interest expense paid on interest-bearing liabilities such as deposits and
borrowed funds. Interest rates are highly sensitive to many factors that are beyond Mid Penn’s control, including general economic conditions
and policies of various governmental and regulatory agencies and, in particular, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
Changes in monetary policy, including changes in interest rates, could influence not only the interest Mid Penn receives on loans and securities
and the amount of interest it pays on deposits and borrowings, but such changes could also affect (i) Mid Penn’s ability to originate loans and
11
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
obtain deposits, (ii) the fair value of Mid Penn’s financial assets and liabilities, and (iii) the average duration of Mid Penn’s mortgage-backed
securities portfolio. If the interest rates paid on deposits and other borrowings increase at a faster rate than the interest rates received on loans
and other investments, Mid Penn’s net interest income, and therefore earnings, could be adversely affected. Earnings could also be adversely
affected if the interest rates received on loans and other investments fall more quickly than the interest rates paid on deposits and other
borrowings.
Management believes it has implemented effective asset and liability management strategies to reduce the potential effects of changes in interest
rates on Mid Penn’s results of operations. Any substantial, unexpected, prolonged change in market interest rates could have a material adverse
effect on Mid Penn’s financial condition and results of operations.
Mid Penn is subject to lending risk
As of December 31, 2010, approximately 69.0% of Mid Penn’s loan portfolio consisted of commercial and industrial, construction and
commercial real estate loans. These types of loans are generally viewed as having more risk of default than residential real estate loans or
consumer loans. These types of loans are also typically larger than residential real estate loans and consumer loans. Because Mid Penn’s loan
portfolio contains a significant number of commercial and industrial, construction and commercial real estate loans with relatively large
balances, the deterioration of one or a few of these loans could cause a significant increase in non-performing loans. An increase in non-
performing loans could result in a net loss of earnings from these loans, an increase in the provision for possible loan and lease losses and an
increase in loan charge-offs, all of which could have a material adverse effect on Mid Penn’s financial condition and results of operations.
Mid Penn’s allowance for possible loan and lease losses may be insufficient
Mid Penn maintains an allowance for possible loan and lease losses, which is a reserve established through provisions for possible losses
charged to expense, that represents management’s best estimate of probable losses that have been incurred within the existing portfolio of loans.
The allowance, in the judgment of management, is necessary to reserve for estimated loan and lease losses and risks inherent in the loan
portfolio. The level of the allowance reflects management’s continuing evaluation of industry concentrations; specific credit risks; loan loss
experience; current loan portfolio quality; present economic, political and regulatory conditions and unidentified losses inherent in the current
loan portfolio. The determination of the appropriate level of the allowance for possible loan and lease losses inherently involves a high degree of
subjectivity and requires Mid Penn to make significant estimates of current credit risks and future trends, all of which may undergo material
changes. Changes in economic conditions affecting borrowers, new information regarding existing loans, identification of additional problem
credits and other factors, both within and outside of Mid Penn’s control, may require an increase in the allowance. In addition, bank regulatory
agencies periodically review Mid Penn’s allowance for possible loan and lease losses and may require an increase in the provision for possible
loan and lease losses or the recognition of further loan charge-offs, based on judgments different than those of management. In addition, if
charge-offs in future periods exceed the allowance, Mid Penn will need additional provisions to increase the allowance for possible loan and
lease losses. Any increases in the allowance will result in a decrease in net income and, possibly, capital, and may have a material adverse effect
on Mid Penn’s financial condition and results of operations.
Competition from other financial institutions may adversely affect Mid Penn’s profitability
Mid Penn’s banking subsidiary faces substantial competition in originating both commercial and consumer loans. This competition comes
principally from other banks, savings institutions, mortgage banking companies and other lenders. Many of its competitors enjoy advantages,
including greater financial resources and higher lending limits, a wider geographic presence, more accessible branch office locations, the ability
to offer a wider array of services or more favorable pricing alternatives, as well as lower origination and operating costs. This competition could
reduce the Corporation’s net income by decreasing the number and size of loans that its banking subsidiary originates and the interest rates it
may charge on these loans.
In attracting business and consumer deposits, its banking subsidiary faces substantial competition from other insured depository institutions such
as banks, savings institutions and credit unions, as well as institutions offering uninsured investment alternatives, including money market funds.
Many of Mid Penn’s competitors enjoy advantages, including greater financial resources, more aggressive marketing campaigns, better brand
recognition, and more convenient branch locations. These competitors may offer higher interest rates than Mid Penn, which could decrease the
deposits that Mid Penn attracts or require Mid Penn to increase its rates to retain existing deposits or attract new deposits. Increased deposit
competition could adversely affect Mid Penn’s ability to generate the funds necessary for lending operations. As a result, Mid Penn may need to
seek other sources of funds that may be more expensive to obtain and could increase its cost of funds.
Mid Penn’s banking subsidiary also competes with non-bank providers of financial services, such as brokerage firms, consumer finance
companies, credit unions, insurance agencies and governmental organizations, which may offer more favorable terms. Some of its non-bank
competitors are not subject to the same extensive regulations that govern its banking operations. As a result, such non-bank competitors may
have advantages over Mid Penn’s banking subsidiary in providing certain products and services. This competition may reduce or limit Mid
Penn’s margins on banking services, reduce its market share and adversely affect its earnings and financial condition.
12
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Mid Penn’s controls and procedures may fail or be circumvented
Management periodically reviews and updates Mid Penn’s internal controls, disclosure controls and procedures, and corporate governance
policies and procedures. Any system of controls, however well designed and operated, is based in part on certain assumptions and can provide
only reasonable, not absolute, assurances that the objectives of the system are met. Any failure or circumvention of Mid Penn’s controls and
procedures or failure to comply with regulations related to controls and procedures could have a material adverse effect on Mid Penn’s business,
results of operations, and financial condition.
Mid Penn’s ability to pay dividends depends primarily on dividends from its banking subsidiary, which is subject to regulatory limits
Mid Penn is a bank holding company and its operations are conducted by its subsidiaries. Its ability to pay dividends depends on its receipt of
dividends from its subsidiaries. Dividend payments from its banking subsidiary are subject to legal and regulatory limitations, generally based
on net profits, and retained earnings, imposed by the various banking regulatory agencies. The ability of Mid Penn’s subsidiaries to pay
dividends is also subject to their profitability, financial condition, capital expenditures and other cash flow requirements. There is no assurance
that Mid Penn’s subsidiaries will be able to pay dividends in the future or that Mid Penn will generate adequate cash flow to pay dividends in the
future. Federal Reserve Board policy, which applies to Mid Penn as a registered bank holding company, also provides that dividends by bank
holding companies should generally be paid out of current earnings looking back over a one-year period. Mid Penn’s failure to pay dividends
on its common stock could have a material adverse effect on the market price of its common stock.
Mid Penn may not be able to attract and retain skilled people
Mid Penn’s success depends, in large part, on its ability to attract and retain key people. Competition for the best people in most activities
engaged in by Mid Penn can be intense and Mid Penn may not be able to hire people or to retain them. The unexpected loss of services of one or
more of Mid Penn’s key personnel could have a material adverse impact on Mid Penn’s business because of their skills, knowledge of Mid
Penn’s market, years of industry experience, and the difficulty of promptly finding qualified replacement personnel.
Mid Penn is subject to claims and litigation pertaining to fiduciary responsibility
From time to time, customers make claims and take legal action pertaining to Mid Penn’s performance of its fiduciary responsibilities. Whether
customer claims and legal action related to Mid Penn’s performance of its fiduciary responsibilities are founded or unfounded, if such claims
and legal actions are not resolved in a manner favorable to Mid Penn they may result in significant financial liability and/or adversely affect the
market perception of Mid Penn and its products and services as well as impact customer demand for those products and services. Any financial
liability or reputation damage could have a material adverse effect on Mid Penn’s business, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect
on Mid Penn’s financial condition and results of operations.
The trading volume in Mid Penn’s common stock is less than that of other larger financial services companies
Mid Penn’s common stock is listed for trading on NASDAQ; the trading volume in its common stock, however, is less than that of other larger
financial services companies. A public trading market having the desired characteristics of depth, liquidity and orderliness depends on the
presence in the marketplace of willing buyers and sellers of Mid Penn’s common stock at any given time. This presence depends on the
individual decisions of investors and general economic and market conditions over which Mid Penn has no control. Given the lower trading
volume of Mid Penn’s common stock, significant sales of Mid Penn’s common stock, or the expectation of these sales, could cause Mid Penn’s
stock price to fall.
Mid Penn operates in a highly regulated environment and may be adversely affected by changes in federal, state and local laws and regulations
Mid Penn is subject to extensive regulation, supervision and examination by federal and state banking authorities. Any change in applicable
regulations or federal, state or local legislation could have a substantial impact on Mid Penn and its operations. Additional legislation and
regulations that could significantly affect Mid Penn’s powers, authority and operations may be enacted or adopted in the future, which could
have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations. Further, regulators have significant discretion and authority to
prevent or remedy unsafe or unsound practices or violations of laws by banks and bank holding companies in the performance of their
supervisory and enforcement duties. The exercise of regulatory authority may have a negative impact on Mid Penn’s results of operations and
financial condition.
In response to the financial crisis that commenced in 2008, Congress has taken actions that are intended to strengthen confidence and encourage
liquidity in financial institutions, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation has taken actions to increase insurance coverage on deposit
accounts. The recently enacted Dodd-Frank Act provides for the creation of a consumer protection division at the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System that will have broad authority to issue regulations governing the services and products we provide consumers. This
additional regulation could increase our compliance costs and otherwise adversely impact our operations. That legislation also contains
provisions that, over time, could result in higher regulatory capital requirements and loan loss provisions for the Bank, and may increase interest
expense due to the ability in July 2011 to pay interest on all demand deposits. In addition, there have been proposals made by members of
Congress and others that would reduce the amount delinquent borrowers are otherwise contractually obligated to pay under their mortgage loans
13
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
and limit an institution’s ability to foreclose on mortgage collateral. These proposals could result in credit losses or increased expense in
pursuing our remedies as a creditor. Recent regulatory changes impose limits on our ability to charge overdraft fees, which may decrease our
non-interest income as compared to more recent prior periods.
The potential exists for additional federal or state laws and regulations, or changes in policy, affecting many aspects of our operations, including
capital levels, lending and funding practices, and liquidity standards. New laws and regulations may increase our costs of regulatory compliance
and of doing business and otherwise affect our operations, and may significantly affect the markets in which we do business, the markets for and
value of our loans and investments, the fees we can charge and our ongoing operations, costs and profitability.
The soundness of other financial institutions may adversely affect Mid Penn
Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty, or other relationships. Mid Penn has exposure to
many different industries and counterparties, and routinely executes transactions with counterparties in the financial services industry, including
commercial banks, brokers and dealers, investment banks, and other institutional clients. Many of these transactions expose Mid Penn to credit
risk in the event of a default by a counterparty or client. In addition, Mid Penn’s credit risk may be exacerbated when the collateral held by Mid
Penn cannot be realized upon or is liquidated at prices not sufficient to recover the full amount of the credit or derivative exposure due to Mid
Penn. Any such losses could have a material adverse affect on the Mid Penn’s financial condition and results of operations.
Current levels of market volatility are unprecedented and may have materially adverse effects on our liquidity and financial condition
The capital and credit markets have been experiencing extreme volatility and disruption for more than two years. In some cases, the markets
have exerted downward pressure on stock prices, security prices, and credit availability for certain issuers without regard to their underlying
financial strength. If the current levels of market disruption and volatility continue or worsen, there can be no assurance that we will not
experience adverse effects, which may be material, on our liquidity, financial condition, and profitability.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None
14
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
With the exception of the Market Square Office in Harrisburg, PA, the Bank owns its main office, branch offices and certain parking facilities
related to its banking offices, all of which are free and clear of any lien. The Bank’s main office and all branch offices are located in
Pennsylvania. All of these properties are in good condition and are deemed by management to be adequate for the Bank’s purposes. The table
below sets forth the location of each of the Bank’s properties.
Property Location
Description of Property
Property Location
Description of Property
Main Office
349 Union Street
Millersburg, PA 17061
Elizabethville Office
4642 State Route 209
Elizabethville, PA 17023
Dalmatia Office
132 School House Road
Dalmatia, PA 17017
Carlisle Pike Office
4622 Carlisle Pike
Mechanicsburg, PA 17050
Derry Street Office
4509 Derry Street
Harrisburg, PA 17111
Front Street Office
2615 North Front Street
Harrisburg, PA 17110
Tower City Office
545 East Grand Avenue
Tower City, PA 17980
Dauphin Office
1001 Peters Mountain Road
Dauphin, PA 17018
Main Bank Office
Branch Office
Branch Office
Branch Office
Branch Office
Branch Office
Branch Office
Branch Office
Lykens Office
550 Main Street
Lykens, PA 17048
Allentown Boulevard Office
5500 Allentown Boulevard
Harrisburg, PA 17112
Market Square Office
17 N. Second Street
Harrisburg, PA 17101
Steelton Office
51 South Front Street
Steelton, PA 17113
Middletown Office
1100 Spring Garden Drive
Middletown, PA 17057
Camp Hill Office
2101 Market Street
Camp Hill, PA 17011
Operations Center
894 N. River Road
Halifax, PA 17032
Derry Street
Administrative Office
4098 Derry Street
Harrisburg, PA 17111
Branch Office
Branch Office
Branch Office
Branch Office
Branch Office
Branch Office
Operations Center
Administrative Office
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Management is not aware of any litigation that would have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial position of the Corporation.
Mid Penn and the Bank have no proceedings pending other than ordinary routine litigation occurring in the normal course of business. In
addition, management does not know of any material proceedings contemplated by governmental authorities against Mid Penn or the Bank or
any of its properties.
ITEM 4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED)
15
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The Corporation’s common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Stock Market under the symbol MPB. The following table shows the range of high
and low sale prices for the Corporation’s stock and cash dividends paid for the quarters indicated.
Quarter Ended:
March 31, 2010
June 30, 2010
September 30, 2010
December 31, 2010
March 31, 2009
June 30, 2009
September 30, 2009
December 31, 2009
High
Low
$
10.60
10.60
9.81
8.00
$
22.00
24.00
17.99
15.06
$
9.05
9.10
5.93
6.35
$
17.36
15.80
14.00
9.75
Cash
Dividends
Paid
-
$
-
-
-
$
0.20
0.16
0.16
-
Transfer Agent: Registrar and Transfer Company, 10 Commerce Drive, Cranford, NJ 07016. Phone: 1-800-368-5948.
Number of Shareholders: As of February 15, 2010, there were approximately 1,486 shareholders of record of Mid Penn’s common stock.
Dividends: There were no quarterly cash dividends paid during 2010. Quarterly cash dividends of $0.52 in the aggregate were paid during
2009. The quarterly dividend payment was suspended during the fourth quarter of 2009 consistent with the Federal Reserve Board policy that
dividend payouts should not exceed net income for the previous four quarters, net of dividends previously paid during that period. On January
26, 2011, Mid Penn declared a cash dividend of $0.05 per common share, payable on February 28, 2011 to shareholders of record as of February
9, 2011.
Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchases: Shareholders of Mid Penn may acquire additional shares of common stock by reinvesting their
cash dividends under the Dividend Reinvestment Plan without paying a brokerage fee. Voluntary cash contributions may also be made under
the Plan. For additional information about the Plan, contact the Transfer Agent.
Annual Meeting: The Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of Mid Penn will be held at 10:00 a.m. on Tuesday, May 3, 2011, at 349 Union
Street, Millersburg, Pennsylvania.
Accounting, Auditing and Internal Control Complaints: Information on how to report a complaint regarding accounting, internal accounting
controls or auditing matters is available at Mid Penn's website: www.midpennbank.com.
16
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Stock Performance Graph
Total Return Performance
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
e
u
l
a
V
x
e
d
n
I
Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.
Russell 3000
Mid-Atlantic Custom Peer Group*
12/31/2005
12/31/2006
12/31/2007
12/31/2008
12/31/2009
12/31/2010
Index
Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.
Russell 3000
Mid-Atlantic Custom Peer Group*
12/31/2005
12/31/2006
12/31/2007
12/31/2008
12/31/2009
12/31/2010
100.00
100.00
100.00
108.41
115.71
102.72
123.89
121.66
96.00
99.91
76.27
76.83
50.54
97.89
71.93
36.84
114.46
79.07
Period Ending
*Mid-Atlantic Custom Peer Group consists of Mid-Atlantic commercial banks with assets less than $1B.
Source : SNL Financial LC, Charlottesville, VA
© 2011
www.snl.com
A detailed list of the Banks comprising the Mid-Atlantic Custom Peer Group is incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 99.1, which is
attached to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
17
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Summary of Selected Financial Data
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
INCOME:
2010
2009
2008
2007
2006
Total Interest Income
Total Interest Expense
Net Interest Income
Provision for Loan and Lease Losses
Noninterest Income
Noninterest Expense
Income (Loss) Before Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes
Provision for (Benefit from) Income Taxes
Net Income (Loss)
Preferred Stock Dividends and Discount Accretion
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common Shareholders
$
30,148
10,642
19,506
2,635
3,414
17,121
3,164
416
2,748
514
2,234
$
31,336
13,304
18,032
9,520
3,656
16,671
(4,503)
(2,208)
(2,295)
514
(2,809)
$
31,856
14,890
16,966
1,230
3,682
14,726
4,692
1,104
3,588
16
3,572
$
31,444
15,339
16,105
925
3,481
12,596
6,065
1,394
4,671
-
4,671
$
28,214
12,732
15,482
735
3,028
11,263
6,512
1,624
4,888
-
4,888
COMMON STOCK DATA PER SHARE:
Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share (Basic)
Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share (Fully Diluted)
Cash Dividends
Book Value Per Share
$
0.64
0.64
-
10.98
$
(0.81)
(0.81)
0.52
10.55
$
1.03
1.03
0.80
11.75
$
1.34
1.34
0.80
11.56
$
1.39
1.39
0.80
11.12
AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING (BASIC)
AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING (FULLY DILUTED)
3,479,780
3,479,780
3,479,780
3,479,780
3,483,097
3,483,153
3,497,806
3,497,806
3,514,820
3,514,820
AT YEAR-END:
Investments
Loans and Leases, Net of Unearned Discount
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
Total Assets
Total Deposits
Short-term Borrowings
Long-term Debt
Shareholders' Equity
RATIOS:
Return on Average Assets
Return on Average Shareholders' Equity
Cash Dividend Payout Ratio
Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses to
Loans and Leases
Average Shareholders' Equity to
Average Assets
$
70,702
467,735
7,061
637,457
554,982
1,561
27,883
48,201
$
47,345
480,385
7,686
606,010
500,015
16,044
38,057
46,704
$
52,739
434,643
5,505
572,999
436,824
23,977
55,223
50,890
$
50,250
377,128
4,790
509,757
372,817
37,349
54,581
40,444
$
57,261
358,612
4,187
491,694
364,226
24,275
59,713
39,085
0.44%
5.71%
0.00%
-0.39%
-4.43%
-64.40%
0.67%
8.87%
77.67%
0.94%
11.84%
59.70%
1.08%
12.93%
54.79%
1.51%
1.60%
1.27%
1.27%
1.17%
7.73%
8.88%
7.55%
7.82%
8.34%
18
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
SPECIAL CAUTIONARY NOTICE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain of the matters discussed in this document may constitute forward-looking statements for purposes of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended, and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and as such may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other
factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of Mid Penn to be materially different from future results, performance
or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The words “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “plan,” “believe,”
“estimate,” and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements.
Mid Penn’s actual results may differ materially from the results anticipated in these forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors,
including, without limitation:
The effects of future economic conditions on Mid Penn and its customers;
•
• Governmental monetary and fiscal policies, as well as legislative and regulatory changes;
•
•
•
•
The effect of changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the regulatory agencies, as well as the Financial
Accounting Standards Board and other accounting standard setters;
The risks of changes in interest rates on the level and composition of deposits, loan demand, and the values of loan collateral, securities
and interest rate protection agreements, as well as interest rate risks;
The effects of economic deterioration on current customers, specifically the effect of the economy on loan customers’ ability to repay
loans;
The effects of competition from other commercial banks, thrifts, mortgage banking firms, consumer finance companies, credit unions,
securities brokerage firms, insurance companies, money market and other mutual funds and other financial institutions operating in Mid
Penn’s market area and elsewhere, including institutions operating locally, regionally, nationally and internationally, together with such
competitors offering banking products and services by mail, telephone, computer and the internet;
The costs and effects of litigation and of unexpected or adverse outcomes in such litigation;
Technological changes;
•
•
• Acquisitions and integration of acquired businesses;
•
The failure of assumptions underlying the establishment of reserves for loan and lease losses and estimations of values of collateral and
various financial assets and liabilities;
• Acts of war or terrorism;
• Volatilities in the securities markets;
• Deteriorating economic conditions.
All written or oral forward-looking statements attributable to Mid Penn are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations analyzes the major elements of Mid Penn’s
consolidated financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Corporation and Notes
thereto and other detailed information appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report. Mid Penn is not aware of any known trends, events,
uncertainties or of any current recommendations by the regulatory authorities which, if they were to be implemented, would have a material
effect on Mid Penn’s liquidity, capital resources or operations.
Financial Summary
The consolidated earnings of Mid Penn are derived primarily from the operations of its wholly owned subsidiary, Mid Penn Bank.
Mid Penn recorded net income available to common shareholders of $2,234,000 for the year 2010, compared to a net loss available to common
shareholders of ($2,809,000) in 2009, which was an increase of $5,043,000 or 179.5%. This represents net income in 2010 of $0.64 per
common share compared to a net loss of ($0.81) per common share in 2009, and $1.03 per common share in 2008.
Total assets of Mid Penn continued to grow in 2010, reaching $637,457,000, an increase of $31,447,000, or 5.2% over $606,010,000 at year-end
2009. The majority of growth came from increases in investments and time deposits in other financial institutions. These increases were funded
primarily through growth in deposits.
Mid Penn’s return on average shareholders’ equity, (ROE), a widely recognized performance indicator in the financial industry, was 5.71% in
2010, (4.43%) in 2009, and 8.87% in 2008. Return on average assets (ROA), another performance indicator, was 0.44% in 2010, (0.39%) in
2009, and 0.67% in 2008.
Mid Penn’s performance during 2010 was a dramatic improvement over the results reported in 2009. This improvement was the result of
reduced loan charge-offs and provision for loan and lease losses, improving cost of funds, and a continuing focus on spending only mission-
critical dollars throughout 2010.
19
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Net charge-offs decreased from $7,339,000 in 2009 to $3,260,000 during 2010. While this level is still historically high, the reduction from
2009 allowed for a reduced provision for loan and lease losses from $9,520,000 in 2009 to $2,635,000 in 2010. The recession and problems in
the commercial real estate sector of the economy continued to negatively impact a number of loans in the portfolio, causing continued elevation
in the level of nonperforming loans. Further discussion of these issues can be found in the Provision for Loan and Lease Losses section below.
Net interest margin improved to 3.47% in 2010 from 3.42% in 2009. This improvement was driven by a 73 basis point improvement in the rate
on supporting liabilities from 2.81% in 2009 to 2.08% in 2010. This improvement allowed average interest spread to increase to 3.20% from
3.01% in 2009 and net interest income on a tax equivalent basis to increase from $18,980,000 in 2009 to $20,468,000 in 2010. This increase was
achieved in spite of the substantial pool of nonperforming loans being carried on the balance sheet. The amount of interest income lost on this
pool of troubled loans in 2010 amounted to $1,116,000. Further discussion of net interest margin can be found in the Net Interest Income
section below.
FDIC insurance premiums decreased in 2010 from 2009, however, this expense remains at historically high levels as the FDIC continues its
efforts to restore the Deposit Insurance Fund and keep it solvent to handle future bank failures should they occur. In addition to high deposit
insurance premiums, the increasing regulatory and compliance burden necessitated the hiring of a dedicated compliance officer in 2010 to
ensure Mid Penn’s continued compliance with current and anticipated future regulatory changes. Mid Penn was negatively impacted by recent
regulatory changes governing overdraft charges on electronic transactions, which has resulted in a reduction in NSF revenue.
In addition to the interest lost on nonperforming loans, this pool of troubled assets increases Mid Penn’s costs associated with the management
and collection of this pool of assets. During 2010, the expenses associated with the increased collection and management efforts on troubled
assets were $307,000 as compared to $124,000 in 2009. Additionally, the losses on sale or write-down of foreclosed assets were $283,000 in
2010 as compared to $110,000 in 2009. This is reflective of the continuing weak real estate market and the overall economic slowness.
The continued soft economy also contributed to the reduction in loans outstanding during 2010. Balances in the components of the loan
portfolio have eroded through contractual payments, the refinancing of real estate secured debt by borrowers with equity in their properties, and
the charge-off of nonperforming credits. Mid Penn experienced weaker loan demand during 2010 despite a desire to sensibly lend to support
creditworthy existing and new customers in the marketplace.
Mid Penn’s fundamental operating performance in 2010 was sound despite these issues and the general economic conditions and credit crisis
issues experienced by the banking industry as a whole.
The Bank’s tier one capital (to risk weighted assets) of $46,799,000 or 10.2% and total capital (to risk weighted assets) of $52,553,000 or 11.5%
at December 31, 2010, are above the regulatory requirements, which is 4% for tier one capital and 8% for total capital. Tier one capital consists
primarily of the Bank’s shareholders' equity. Total capital includes qualifying subordinated debt, if any, and the allowance for loan and lease
losses, within permitted limits. Risk-weighted assets are determined by assigning various levels of risk to different categories of assets and off-
balance sheet activities.
Critical Accounting Estimates
Mid Penn’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (“GAAP”) and conform to general practices within the banking industry. Application of these principles involves significant
judgments and estimates by management that have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities. The judgments and
estimates that we used are based on historical experiences and other factors, which are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
Because of the nature of the judgments and estimates that we have made, actual results could differ from these judgments and estimates, which
could have a material impact on the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the results of our operations.
Management of the Corporation considers the accounting judgments relating to the allowance for loan and lease losses, the evaluation of the
Corporation’s investment securities for other-than-temporary impairment, and the assessment of goodwill for impairment to be the accounting
areas that require the most subjective and complex judgments.
The allowance for loan and lease losses represents management’s estimate of probable incurred credit losses inherent in the loan and lease
portfolio. Determining the amount of the allowance for loan and lease losses is considered a critical accounting estimate because it requires
significant judgment and the use of estimates related to the amount and timing of expected future cash flows on impaired loans, estimated losses
on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience, and consideration of current economic trends and conditions, all of which
may be susceptible to significant change. The loan and lease portfolio also represents the largest asset type on the consolidated balance sheet.
Throughout the remainder of this report, the terms “loan” or “loans” refers to both loans and leases.
Valuations for the investment portfolio are determined using quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available,
investment valuation is based on pricing models, quotes for similar investment securities, and observable yield curves and spreads. In addition
to valuation, management must assess whether there are any declines in value below the carrying value of the investments that should be
considered other than temporary or otherwise require an adjustment in carrying value and recognition of the loss in the consolidated statement of
operations.
20
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 350, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other, requires that goodwill is not amortized to expense, but
rather that it be tested for impairment at least annually. Impairment write-downs are charged to results of operations in the period in which the
impairment is determined. The Corporation did not identify any impairment on its outstanding goodwill from its most recent testing, which was
performed as of December 31, 2010. If certain events occur which might indicate goodwill has been impaired, the goodwill is tested when such
events occur.
Net Interest Income
Net interest income, Mid Penn's primary source of revenue, represents the difference between interest income and interest expense. Net interest
income is affected by changes in interest rates and changes in average balances (volume) in the various interest-sensitive assets and liabilities.
21
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
TABLE 1: AVERAGE BALANCES, EFFECTIVE INTEREST DIFFERENTIAL AND INTEREST YIELDS
Income and Rates on a Taxable Equivalent Basis for Years Ended
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2010
December 31, 2009
December 31, 2008
Average
Balance
Average
Interest
Rates
Average
Balance
Average
Interest
Rates
Average
Balance
Average
Interest
Rates
ASSETS:
Interest Earning Balances
$
45,244
$
818
1.81%
$
41,925
$
1,460
3.48%
$
54,804
$
2,499
4.56%
Investment Securities:
Taxable
Tax-Exempt
Total Securities
Federal Funds Sold
Loans and Leases, Net:
Taxable
Tax-Exempt
Total Loans
and Leases, Net
Restricted Investment
in Bank Stocks
Total Earning Assets
Cash and Due from Banks
31,981
26,254
58,235
9,222
455,927
16,655
472,582
3,995
589,278
7,466
800
1,679
2.50%
6.40%
25
0.27%
26,660
1,128
5.85%
6.77%
-
31,110
0.00%
5.28%
18,829
25,188
44,017
279
446,649
17,504
464,153
3,929
554,303
6,795
665
1,774
3.53%
7.04%
1
0.30%
27,370
1,013
6.13%
5.79%
1
32,284
0.03%
5.82%
19,870
27,287
47,157
-
394,674
8,994
403,668
3,657
509,286
7,745
831
1,895
4.18%
6.94%
-
-
26,713
648
6.77%
7.20%
134
32,720
3.66%
6.42%
Other Assets
Total Assets
26,330
623,074
$
22,071
583,169
$
21,326
538,357
$
LIABILITIES &
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Interest Bearing Deposits:
NOW
Money Market
Savings
Time
Short-term Borrowings
Long-term Debt
Total Interest
$
48,024
163,415
26,585
239,761
3,798
28,860
69
2,357
16
6,877
18
1,305
0.14%
1.44%
0.06%
2.87%
0.47%
4.52%
$
38,198
87,427
26,241
255,123
19,715
47,241
33
1,383
17
9,293
112
2,466
0.09%
1.58%
0.06%
3.64%
0.57%
5.22%
$
36,551
69,251
25,607
230,773
29,144
52,843
108
1,456
65
9,903
608
2,750
0.30%
2.10%
0.25%
4.29%
2.09%
5.20%
Bearing Liabilities
510,443
10,642
2.08%
473,945
13,304
2.81%
444,169
14,890
3.35%
Demand Deposits
Other Liabilities
Shareholders' Equity
58,480
6,010
48,141
Total Liabilities and
Shareholders' Equity
$
623,074
51,464
5,985
51,775
47,274
6,456
40,458
$
583,169
$
538,357
Net Interest Income
$
20,468
$
18,980
$
17,830
Net Yield on Interest Earning Assets:
Total Yield on Earning Assets
Rate on Supporting Liabilities
Average Interest Spread
Net Interest Margin
5.28%
2.08%
3.20%
3.47%
5.82%
2.81%
3.01%
3.42%
6.42%
3.35%
3.07%
3.50%
Interest and average rates are presented on a fully taxable equivalent basis, using an effective tax rate of 34%. For purposes of calculating loan
yields, average loan balances include nonaccrual loans.
22
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Loan fees of $710,000, $683,000, and $637,000 are included with interest income in Table 1 for the years 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
TABLE 2: VOLUME ANALYSIS OF CHANGES IN NET INTEREST INCOME
(Dollars in thousands)
Taxable Equivalent Basis
INTEREST INCOME:
Interest Bearing Balances
Investment Securities:
Taxable
Tax-Exempt
Total Investment Securities
Federal Funds Sold
Loans and Leases, Net
Restricted Investment Bank Stocks
Total Interest Income
INTEREST EXPENSE:
Interest Bearing Deposits:
NOW
Money Market
Savings
Time
Total Interest Bearing Deposits
Short-term Borrowings
Long-term Debt
Total Interest Expense
2010 Compared to 2009
Increase (Decrease) Due to Change In:
Rate
Net
Volume
2009 Compared to 2008
Increase (Decrease) Due to Change In:
Rate
Net
Volume
$
116
$
(758)
$
(642)
$
(587)
$
(452)
$
(1,039)
465
75
540
27
519
0
1,202
8
1,202
0
(560)
650
(90)
(959)
(400)
(330)
(170)
(500)
(3)
(1,114)
(1)
(2,376)
28
(228)
(1)
(1,856)
(2,057)
(4)
(202)
(2,262)
135
(95)
40
24
(595)
(1)
(1,174)
36
974
(1)
(2,416)
(1,407)
(94)
(1,161)
(2,662)
(44)
(146)
(190)
1
4,703
10
3,937
5
382
2
1,045
1,434
(197)
(292)
945
(122)
25
(97)
-
(3,681)
(143)
(4,373)
(80)
(455)
(50)
(1,655)
(2,240)
(299)
8
(2,531)
(166)
(121)
(287)
1
1,022
(133)
(436)
(75)
(73)
(48)
(610)
(806)
(496)
(284)
(1,586)
NET INTEREST INCOME
$
1,601
$
(113)
$
1,488
$
2,992
$
(1,842)
$
1,150
The effect of changing volume and rate has been allocated entirely to the rate column. Tax-exempt income is shown on a tax equivalent basis
assuming a federal income tax rate of 34%.
During 2010, net interest income increased $1,488,000 or 7.8%, as compared to an increase of $1,150,000 or 6.4% in 2009. The average
balances, effective interest differential, and interest yields for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 and the components of net
interest income, are presented in Table 1. A comparative presentation of the changes in net interest income for 2010 compared to 2009, and
2009 compared to 2008, is provided in Table 2. This analysis indicates the changes in interest income and interest expense caused by the
volume and rate components of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities.
The yield on earning assets decreased to 5.28% in 2010 from 5.82% in 2009. The yield on earning assets for 2008 was 6.42%. The change in
the yield on earning assets was due primarily to changes in market interest rates and extreme rate competition within our market. The average
“prime rate” for 2010 and 2009 was 3.25% as compared to 5.21% for 2008. The yield on earning assets is also negatively impacted by the loss
of interest on nonperforming loans. During 2010, this loss of interest amounted to $1,116,000. Had this interest been included in Mid Penn’s
earnings, the yield on earning assets would have increased 0.19%.
Interest expense decreased by $2,662,000, or 20.0%, in 2010 as compared to a decrease of $1,586,000, or 10.7%, in 2009. The cost of interest
bearing liabilities decreased to 2.08% in 2010 from 2.81% in 2009. The cost of interest bearing liabilities for 2008 was 3.35%. The reduction in
cost of interest bearing liabilities was due to changes in market interest rates and Mid Penn’s ability to reduce the rates on Money Market
accounts and Certificates of Deposit. The reduction in market interest rates also had a positive impact on Mid Penn’s cost for short-term
borrowings.
23
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Net interest margin, on a tax equivalent basis, influenced by the increase in nonaccrual loans in 2010, was 3.47% compared to 3.42% in 2009
and 3.50% in 2008. The interest rate impact of earning assets and funding sources due to changes in interest rates can be reasonably estimated
at current interest rate levels, the options selected by customers, and the future mix of the loan, investment, and deposit products in the Bank's
portfolios, may significantly change the estimates used in the simulation models. In addition, our net interest income may be impacted by
further interest rate actions of the Federal Reserve Bank. Management continues to monitor the net interest margin closely.
Provision for Loan and Lease Losses
The provision for loan and lease losses is the expense necessary to maintain the allowance for loan and lease losses at a level adequate to absorb
management’s estimate of probable losses in the loan and lease portfolio. Mid Penn’s provision for loan and lease losses is based upon
management’s monthly review of the loan portfolio. The purpose of the review is to assess loan quality, identify impaired loans and leases,
analyze delinquencies, ascertain loan and lease growth, evaluate potential charge-offs and recoveries, and assess general economic conditions in
the markets we serve.
During 2010, Mid Penn continued to experience a challenging economic and operating environment. Given the economic pressures that impact
some borrowers, Mid Penn has maintained the allowance for loan and lease losses in accordance with Mid Penn’s assessment process, which
took into consideration the decrease in collateral values from December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2010. For the year ended December 31,
2010, the provision for loan and lease losses was $2,635,000, as compared to $9,520,000 for the year ended December 31, 2009.
For the year ended December 31, 2010, Mid Penn had net charge-offs of $3,260,000 as compared to net charge-offs of $7,339,000 during the
year ended December 31, 2009. Loans charged off during 2010 were comprised of 19 residential real estate loans totaling $858,000, 8
commercial real estate loans totaling $1,079,000, and 3 land development loans representing $334,000 of the total. In addition, 7 commercial
and industrial loans totaling $787,000 and 1 lease in the amount of $230,000 were charged off during 2010. The remaining $146,000 was
comprised primarily of various consumer loans. Mid Penn may need to make future adjustments to the allowance and the provision for loan and
lease losses if economic conditions or loan credit quality differs substantially from the assumptions used in making Mid Penn’s evaluation of the
level of the allowance for loan losses as compared to the balance of outstanding loans.
Following its model for loan and lease loss allowance adequacy, management recorded a $2,635,000 provision in 2010, as well as a provision of
$9,520,000 in 2009, and $1,230,000 in 2008. The allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage of total loans was 1.51% at December 31,
2010, compared to 1.60% at December 31, 2009 and 1.27% at December 31, 2008, which has been higher than that of peer financial institutions
due to Mid Penn’s higher level of loans to finance commercial real estate. A summary of charge-offs and recoveries of loans and leases are
presented in Table 3.
24
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
TABLE 3: ANALYSIS OF THE ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES
(Dollars in thousands)
Balance, beginning of year
Loans and leases charged off:
Commercial real estate, construction
and land development
Commercial, industrial and agricultural
Real estate - residential
Consumer
Leases
Total loans and leases charged off
Recoveries on loans and leases previously
charged off:
Commercial real estate, construction
and land development
Commercial, industrial and agricultural
Real estate - residential
Consumer
Leases
Total loans and leases recovered
2010
Years ended December 31,
2008
2007
2009
2006
$
7,686
$
5,505
$
4,790
$
4,187
$
3,704
1,413
787
858
146
230
3,434
21
3
70
80
-
174
2,841
4,158
115
209
108
7,431
-
-
16
76
-
92
384
70
-
188
5
647
1
20
-
111
-
132
-
100
-
231
129
460
-
-
5
49
84
138
17
158
-
134
-
309
-
3
-
54
-
57
Net charge-offs
Provision for loan and lease losses
Balance, end of year
3,260
2,635
7,061
$
7,339
9,520
7,686
$
515
1,230
5,505
$
322
925
4,790
$
252
735
4,187
$
Ratio of net charge-offs during the year
to average loans and leases outstanding during
the year, net of unearned discount
Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage
of total loans and leases at December 31
Allowance for loan and lease losses as a percentage
of non-performing assets at December 31
Noninterest Income
2010
Years ended December 31,
2008
2007
2009
2006
0.69%
1.58%
0.13%
0.09%
0.08%
1.51%
1.60%
1.27%
1.27%
1.17%
35.05%
48.33%
96.92%
97.68%
290.97%
A summary of the major components of noninterest income for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 is found in Table 4. During
2010, Mid Penn earned $3,414,000 in noninterest income, compared to $3,656,000 earned in 2009 and $3,682,000 earned in 2008.
Service charges on deposit accounts amounted to $1,139,000 for 2010, a decrease of $340,000 or 23.0% compared to $1,479,000 for 2009,
which was a decrease of $175,000 or 10.6% below 2008. The decrease in service charges in 2010 occurred in spite of general growth in
transaction accounts during 2010. During this period of economic downturn, customers seem to have become more conscientious about their
account balances and avoiding unnecessary charges related to insufficient funds. In addition to this behavioral change, Mid Penn was negatively
impacted by recent regulatory changes governing overdraft charges on electronic transactions, which has resulted in a reduction in NSF revenue.
Helping to offset this reduction in revenue is the increase in mortgage banking income during the year ended December 31, 2010 versus the
same period in 2009. Historically low long-term mortgage rates triggered a wave of refinancing activity, improving fee income from this line of
25
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
business. During 2010, additional focus has been directed to this area through staffing and streamlined processes to improve service and
generate increased revenue from mortgage lending. During late 2009 and early 2010, Mid Penn enhanced the mortgage origination process by
adding resources and improving processing capabilities which have generated additional revenue in 2010.
Mid Penn owns cash surrender value of life insurance policies on its directors. The income on these policies amounted to $270,000 during the
year 2010, $280,000 in 2009, and $267,000 in 2008. In addition to the income on these life insurance policies, Mid Penn recognized a gain on
life insurance proceeds in 2009 of $158,000 from the death of a retired director in February 2009.
Trust department income for 2010 was $200,000, a $43,000 or 17.7% decrease from $243,000 in 2009, which was a $70,000 or 22.4% decrease
from $313,000 in 2008. Trust Department income can fluctuate from year to year, due to the number of estates settled during the year.
Mid Penn also earned $230,000 in 2010, $173,000 in 2009, and $175,000 in 2008 in fees from the third-party seller of investments whose
services the Bank has contracted.
Other income amounted to $603,000 in 2010, $730,000 in 2009, and $722,000 in 2008.
TABLE 4: NONINTEREST INCOME
(Dollars in thousands)
Trust department income
Service charges on deposits
Investment securities gains, net
Earnings from cash surrender value of life insurance
Gain on life insurance proceeds
Mortgage banking income
Merchant services revenue
ATM debit card interchange income
Retail investment revenue
Other income
Total Noninterest Income
Noninterest Expense
2010
$
Years ended December 31,
2009
$
2008
$
200
1,139
-
270
-
423
141
408
230
603
3,414
243
1,479
-
280
158
124
128
341
173
730
3,656
313
1,654
9
267
-
78
89
375
175
722
3,682
$
$
$
A summary of the major components of noninterest expense for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 is reflected in Table 5.
Noninterest expense increased to $17,121,000 in 2010 from $16,671,000 in 2009 and $14,726,000 in 2008.
The major component of noninterest expense is salaries and employee benefits. Increases in the 2010 workforce primarily included additions to
loan and deposit support functions within the Corporation, in order to provide enhanced controls and to support future growth. The escalating
compliance and regulatory burden experienced by banks throughout the industry necessitated the hiring of dedicated compliance staff as well as
dedicating resources from support areas throughout the Corporation to complying with the expanding regulatory changes. Mid Penn also
recognized in 2010 a full year of salary and employee benefits expense from the 2009 additions within the support functions throughout the
Corporation to enhance controls and support future growth. In addition, commission-based compensation paid to mortgage originators and retail
investment representatives increased $155,000 from 2009 levels.
FDIC insurance expense eased slightly in 2010, closing the year at $897,000 as compared to $1,163,000 during 2009. The historically high
levels of FDIC insurance expense during 2009 and 2010 stem from the escalation in Deposit Insurance premiums assessed by the FDIC on all its
member banks to restore the Deposit Insurance Fund and keep it solvent to handle future bank failures should they occur. Included in the 2009
expense line is a special assessment of $265,000, levied on all FDIC member banks in June of 2009 to aid in the restoration of the Insurance
Fund.
Occupancy and equipment expenses also increased in 2010 primarily in connection with the construction of a new banking office on Derry
Street in Harrisburg, PA. This new facility allowed for the relocation of the existing banking office on Derry Street to a nearby location with
improved visibility and customer access.
Legal and professional expenses decreased in 2010 to $529,000 from $814,000 in 2009. During 2009, Mid Penn incurred increased legal fees
associated with its loan workout efforts. The increase was also driven by ongoing projects within the technology area to implement enhanced
efficiencies within the support areas and enhance Mid Penn’s ability to offer new products and services in the upcoming year. While loan
26
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
workout efforts continued at historically high levels in 2010, the technology projects have moved to the implementation phases, allowing for a
reduction in professional expenses.
Marketing and advertising expense decreased from $679,000 in 2009 to $299,000 in 2010, which is reflective of Mid Penn’s ongoing focus on
spending only mission-critical dollars.
Computer expense increased from $393,000 in 2009 to $578,000 in 2010. Mid Penn has been making significant enhancements to technology
platforms to enhance efficiencies within the support departments and enable updated products and services to customers. These charges reflect
the ongoing service contracts for these enhancements.
Internet banking expense increased to $138,000 in 2010 from $88,000 in 2009. A major focus throughout 2010 was the implementation of an
enhanced website and internet banking platform. The cost of providing enhanced functionality is reflected in this line item and is part of Mid
Penn’s efforts to provide a robust suite of technology-related products and services to the marketplace.
The final significant item was the loss on sale or write-down on foreclosed assets of $283,000 in 2010 and $110,000 in 2009. This item resulted
from Mid Penn’s ongoing analysis of the carrying values of repossessed properties and the adjustment of their values to current market rates in
the face of the overall decline in real estate values plaguing the real estate market.
TABLE 5: NONINTEREST EXPENSE
(Dollars in thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits
Severance expense
Occupancy expense, net
Equipment expense
Pennsylvania Bank Shares tax expense
Legal and Professional fees
Marketing and advertising expense
ATM debit card processing expense
Director fees and benefits expense
Computer expense
Telephone expense
Stationery and supplies expense
Postage expense
Meals, travel, and lodging expense
Contributions expense
Internet banking expense
Courier expense
Intangible amortization
Correspondent service charge expense
FDIC Assessment
Loss / write-down on sale of foreclosed assets
Other expenses
Total Noninterest Expense
Investments
Years ended December 31,
2009
2008
2010
$
$
$
8,760
-
916
1,361
443
529
299
122
304
578
362
156
172
211
35
138
60
65
87
897
283
1,343
17,121
8,173
-
844
1,170
366
814
679
126
293
393
344
151
156
200
77
88
96
65
95
1,163
110
1,268
16,671
7,197
478
967
870
315
769
525
169
354
319
193
242
162
146
134
112
112
66
90
116
281
1,109
14,726
$
$
$
Mid Penn’s investment portfolio is utilized to provide liquidity and managed to maximize return within reasonable risk parameters.
Mid Penn’s entire portfolio of investment securities is considered available for sale. As such, the investments are recorded at fair value. Our
investments are valued at a market price relative to investments of the same type with similar maturity dates. As the interest rate environment of
these securities changes, the value of securities changes accordingly.
As of December 31, 2010, the unrealized gain on investment securities resulted in an increase in shareholders’ equity of $176,000 (unrealized
gain on securities of $266,000 less estimated income tax expense of $90,000). At December 31, 2009, the unrealized gain on investment
securities resulted in an increase in shareholders’ equity of $817,000 (unrealized gain on securities of $1,238,000 less estimated income tax
27
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
expense of $421,000) compared to a December 31, 2008 increase in the unrealized gain included in other comprehensive income of $553,000
(unrealized gain on securities of $837,000 less estimated income tax expense of $284,000). Mid Penn does not have any significant
concentrations within investment securities. Table 6 provides a summary of our available for sale investment securities.
TABLE 6: FAIR VALUE OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES
(Dollars in thousands)
U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agencies
Mortgage-backed U.S. government agencies
State and political subdivision obligations
Equity securities
2010
December 31,
2009
2008
$
$
$
17,394
25,387
27,678
243
70,702
15,700
4,619
26,781
245
47,345
$
$
$
23,086
4,173
25,244
236
52,739
Maturity and yield information relating to the investment portfolio is shown in Table 7.
TABLE 7: INVESTMENT MATURITY AND YIELD
(Dollars in thousands)
As of December 31, 2010
U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agencies
Mortgage-backed U.S. government agencies
State and political subdivision obligations
Equity securities
One Year
and Less
7,549
$
2,120
276
-
9,945
$
After One
Year thru
Five Years
3,120
$
18,669
3,438
-
25,227
$
After Five
Years thru
Ten Years
6,725
$
17
9,289
-
16,031
$
After Ten
Years
-
$
4,581
14,675
243
19,499
$
Total
$
17,394
25,387
27,678
243
70,702
$
Weighted Average Yields
U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agencies
Mortgage-backed U.S. government agencies
State and political subdivision obligations (FTE)
Equity securities
Loans
One Year
and Less
After One
Year thru
Five Years
After Five
Years thru
Ten Years
After Ten
Years
Total
1.90%
1.27%
7.33%
-
1.92%
2.09%
2.31%
6.65%
-
2.87%
3.62%
3.10%
6.32%
-
5.18%
-
4.52%
6.42%
5.03%
5.96%
2.60%
2.62%
6.42%
5.03%
4.11%
At December 31, 2010, loans and leases totaled $467,735,000; a $12,650,000 or 2.6% decrease from December 31, 2009. During 2010, Mid
Penn experienced a net decrease in commercial real estate and commercial/industrial loans of approximately $16,463,000. This decrease was
the result of a shortage of qualified borrowers seeking credit during 2010. The lower demand levels within the markets Mid Penn serves created
a situation in which new originations were unable to keep pace with the normal loan paydowns within the portfolio.
At December 31, 2010, loans, net of unearned income, represented 78.3% of earning assets as compared to 84.8% on December 31, 2009, and
80.2% on December 31, 2008.
The Bank's loan portfolio is diversified among individuals, farmers, and small and medium-sized businesses generally located within the Bank's
trading area of Dauphin County, lower Northumberland County, western Schuylkill County and eastern Cumberland County. Commercial real
estate, construction and land development loans are collateralized mainly by mortgages on the income-producing real estate or land involved.
Commercial, industrial and agricultural loans are made to business entities and may be secured by business assets, including commercial real
estate, or may be unsecured. Residential real estate loans are secured by liens on the residential property. Consumer loans include installment
loans, lines of credit and home equity loans. The Bank has no concentration of credit to any one borrower. The Bank’s highest concentration of
credit is in Commercial Real Estate financings.
28
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
A distribution of the Bank's loan portfolio according to major loan classification is shown in Table 8.
TABLE 8: LOAN PORTFOLIO
(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial real estate,
construction and land
2010
2009
Amount
%
Amount
%
December 31,
2008
Amount
%
2007
Amount
%
2006
Amount
%
development
$
252,915
54.0
$
253,878
52.8
$
234,762
53.9
$
197,192
52.1
$
191,420
53.1
Commercial, industrial
and agricultural
Real estate - residential
Consumer
Total Loans
Unearned income
Loans net of unearned
discount
Allowance for loan and
15.0
29.1
1.9
100.0
70,295
136,048
8,922
468,180
(445)
467,735
17.8
26.7
2.7
100.0
85,795
128,522
12,884
481,079
(694)
480,385
16.4
27.2
2.5
100.0
71,385
118,547
11,103
435,797
(1,154)
434,643
17.3
28.0
2.6
100.0
65,421
106,141
9,987
378,741
(1,613)
377,128
16.8
27.3
2.8
100.0
60,566
98,323
10,027
360,336
(1,763)
358,573
lease losses
Net loans
(7,061)
460,674
$
(7,686)
472,699
$
(5,505)
429,138
$
(4,790)
372,338
$
(4,187)
354,386
$
Mid Penn’s maturity and rate sensitivity information related to the loan portfolio is reflected in Table 9.
TABLE 9: LOAN MATURITY AND INTEREST SENSITIVITY
(Dollars in thousands)
As of December 31, 2010
Commercial real estate, construction
and land development
Commercial, industrial and
agricultural
Real estate - residential mortgages
Consumer
Rate Sensitivity
Predetermined rate
Floating or adjustable rate
One Year
and Less
After One
Year thru
Five Years
After Five
Years
Total
$
70,609
$
162,539
$
19,767
$
252,915
10,903
26,347
2,787
110,646
$
50,247
81,726
4,080
298,592
$
9,145
27,962
1,623
58,497
$
70,295
136,035
8,490
467,735
$
$
$
184,068
283,667
467,735
$
$
56,859
1,638
58,497
$
24,794
85,852
110,646
$
$
$
102,415
196,177
298,592
29
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Credit Quality, Credit Risk, and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
Other than as described herein, we do not believe there are any trends, events or uncertainties that are reasonably expected to have a material
impact on future results of operations, liquidity, or capital resources. Further, based on known information, we believe that the effects of current
and past economic conditions and other unfavorable business conditions may influence certain borrowers’ abilities to comply with their
repayment terms. Mid Penn continues to monitor closely the financial strength of these borrowers. Mid Penn does not engage in practices
which may be used to artificially shield certain borrowers from the negative economic or business cycle effects that may compromise their
ability to repay. Mid Penn does not structure construction loans with interest reserve components. Mid Penn has not in the past performed any
commercial real estate or other type loan workouts whereby an existing loan was restructured into multiple new loans. Also, Mid Penn does not
extend loans at maturity due to the existence of guarantees, without recognizing the credit as impaired. While the existence of a guarantee may
be a mitigating factor in determining the proper level of allowance once impairment has been identified, the guarantee does not affect the
impairment analysis.
TABLE 10: NONPERFORMING ASSETS
(Dollars in thousands)
Nonperforming Assets:
Nonaccrual loans
Loans renegotiated with borrowers
Total nonperforming loans
Foreclosed real estate
Other repossessed property
Total non-performing assets
2010
2009
December 31,
2008
2007
2006
$
17,228
2,323
19,551
$
14,933
308
15,241
$
4,113
51
4,164
$
4,317
-
4,317
$
1,293
-
1,293
596
-
20,147
663
-
15,904
1,516
-
5,680
528
59
4,904
146
-
1,439
Accruing loans 90 days or more past due
Total risk elements
19
20,166
$
661
16,565
$
1,860
7,540
$
2,439
7,343
$
995
2,434
$
Nonperforming loans as a % of total
loans outstanding
Nonperforming assets as a % of total
loans outstanding and other real estate
Ratio of allowance for loan losses
to nonperforming loans
4.18%
4.31%
3.17%
3.31%
0.96%
1.30%
1.14%
1.30%
0.36%
0.40%
36.12%
50.43%
132.20%
110.96%
323.82%
Mid Penn assesses a specific allocation for both commercial loans and commercial real estate loans prior to charging down or charging off the
loan. Once the charge down is taken, the remaining balance remains a nonperforming loan with the original terms and interest rate intact and is
not treated as a restructured credit. The following table provides additional analysis of partially charged-off loans:
30
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
TABLE 11: PARTIALLY CHARGED OFF LOANS
(Dollars in thousands)
Period ending total loans outstanding (net of unearned income)
Allowance for loan and lease losses
Total Nonperforming loans
Nonperforming and impaired loans with partial charge-offs
December 31, 2010
467,735
$
7,061
19,551
7,487
December 31, 2009
480,385
$
7,686
15,241
7,963
Ratio of nonperforming loans with partial charge-offs
to total loans
Ratio of nonperforming loans with partial charge-offs
to total nonperforming loans
Coverage ratio net of nonperforming loans with
partial charge-offs
Ratio of total allowance to total loans less
nonperforming loans with partial charge-offs
1.60%
1.66%
38.29%
52.25%
58.53%
105.61%
1.53%
1.63%
Mid Penn has not experienced any additional charge-offs on loans for which a partial charge-off had originally been taken.
Mid Penn considers a commercial loan or commercial real estate loan to be impaired when it becomes 90 days or more past due and not in the
process of collection. This methodology assumes the borrower cannot or will not continue to make additional payments. At that time the loan
would be considered collateral dependent as the discounted cash flow (“DCF”) method indicates no operating income is available for evaluating
the collateral position; therefore, all impaired loans are deemed to be collateral dependent.
Mid Penn evaluates loans for charge-off on a monthly basis. Policies that govern the recommendation for charge-off are unique to the type of
loan being considered. Commercial loans rated as nonaccrual or lower will first have a collateral evaluation completed in accordance with the
guidance on impaired loans. Once the collateral evaluation has been completed, a specific allocation of allowance is made based upon the
results of the evaluation. In the event the loan is unsecured, the loan would have been charged-off at the recognition of impairment. If the loan
is secured, it will undergo a 90 day waiting period to ensure the collateral shortfall identified in the evaluation is accurate and then charged
down by the specific allocation. Once the charge down is taken, the remaining balance remains a nonperforming loan with the original terms and
interest rate intact (not restructured). Commercial real estate loans rated as impaired will also have an initial collateral evaluation completed in
accordance with the guidance on impaired loans. An updated real estate valuation is ordered and the collateral evaluation is modified to reflect
any variations in value. A specific allocation of allowance is made for any anticipated collateral shortfall and a 90-day waiting period begins to
ensure the accuracy of the collateral shortfall. The loan is then charged down by the specific allocation. Once the charge down is taken, the
remaining balance remains a nonperforming loan with the original terms and interest rate intact (not restructured). The process of charge-off for
residential mortgage loans begins upon a loan becoming delinquent for 90 days and not in the process of collection. The existing appraisal is
reviewed and a lien search is obtained to determine lien position and any instances of intervening liens. A new appraisal of the property will be
ordered if deemed necessary by management and a collateral evaluation is completed. The loan will then be charged down to the value indicated
in the evaluation. Consumer loans are recommended for charge-off after reaching delinquency of 90 days and the loan is not in the process of
collection. The entire balance of the consumer loan is recommended for charge-off at this point.
As noted above, Mid Penn assesses a specific allocation for both commercial loans and commercial real estate loans prior to charging down or
charging off the loan. Once the charge down is taken, the remaining balance remains a nonperforming loan with the original terms and interest
rate intact (not restructured). In addition, Mid Penn takes a preemptive step when any commercial loan or commercial real estate loan becomes
classified under its internal classification system. A preliminary collateral evaluation in accordance with the guidance on impaired loans is
prepared using the existing collateral information in the loan file. This process allows Mid Penn to review both the credit and documentation
files to determine the status of the information needed to make a collateral evaluation. This collateral evaluation is preliminary but allows Mid
Penn to determine if any potential collateral shortfalls exist.
Larger groups of small-balance loans, such as residential mortgages and consumer installment loans are collectively evaluated for impairment.
Accordingly, individual consumer and residential loans are not separately identified for impairment disclosures unless such loans are the subject
of a restructuring agreement.
31
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Mid Penn’s rating system assumes any loans classified as sub-standard non-accrual to be impaired, and all of these loans are considered
collateral dependent; therefore, all of Mid Penn’s impaired loans, whether reporting a specific allocation or not, are considered collateral
dependent.
It is Mid Penn’s policy to obtain updated third party valuations on all impaired loans collateralized by real estate within 30 days of the credit
being classified as sub-standard non-accrual. Prior to receipt of the updated real estate valuation Mid Penn will use any existing real estate
valuation to determine any potential allowance issues; however no allowance recommendation will be made until which time Mid Penn is in
receipt of the updated valuation. The credit department employs an electronic tracking system to monitor the receipt of and need for updated
appraisals. To date, there have been no significant time lapses noted with the above processes.
In some instances Mid Penn is not holding real estate as collateral and is relying on business assets (personal property) for repayment. In these
circumstances a collateral inspection is performed by Mid Penn personnel to determine an estimated value. The value is based on net book
value, as provided by the financial statements, and discounted accordingly based on determinations made by management. Occasionally, Mid
Penn will employ an outside service to provide a fair estimate of value based on auction sales or private sales. Management reviews the
estimates of these third parties and discounts them accordingly based on management’s judgment, if deemed necessary.
For impaired loans with no valuation allowance required, Mid Penn’s practice of obtaining independent third party market valuations on the
subject property within 30 days of being placed on non-accrual status sometimes indicates that the loan to value ratio is sufficient to obviate the
need for a specific allocation in spite of significant deterioration in real estate values in Mid Penn’s primary market area. These circumstances
are determined on a case by case analysis of the impaired loans.
Mid Penn actively monitors the values of collateral on impaired loans. This monitoring may require the modification of collateral values over
time or changing circumstances by some factor, either positive or negative, from the original values. All collateral values will be assessed by
management at least every 18 months for possible revaluation by an independent third party.
Mid Penn does not currently, or plan in the future to, use automated valuation methodologies as a method of valuing real estate collateral.
As of December 31, 2010, Mid Penn had several unrelated loan relationships, with an aggregate carrying balance of $15,269,000, deemed
impaired. This pool of loans is further broken down into a group of loans with an aggregate carrying balance of $5,146,000 for which specific
allocations totaling $1,883,000 have been included within the loan loss reserve for these loans. The remaining $10,123,000 of loans requires no
specific allocation within the loan loss reserve. The $15,269,000 pool of impaired loan relationships is comprised of $7,904,000 in real estate
secured commercial relationships and $7,365,000 in business relationships. There are specific allocations against the real estate secured pool
totaling $414,000, spread among five relationships composed primarily of customers engaged in real estate investment activities. The group of
impaired business relationships with specific allocations is made up of ten relationships primarily engaged in various forms of manufacturing
and a specific allocation of $1,469,000 has been set aside against these credits. Nine manufacturing relationships account for $1,069,000 of the
specific allocations due to the negative effects of the economy on their businesses and the subsequent collateral devaluation. One additional
large commercial participation loan in this pool has shown exceptional collateral devaluation and is responsible for a specific allocation of
$400,000 of the total pool attributable to this segment. Management currently believes that the specific reserves are adequate to cover probable
future losses related to these relationships.
The allowance for loan losses is a reserve established in the form of a provision expense for loan and lease losses and is reduced by loan charge-
offs net of recoveries. In conjunction with an internal loan review function that operates independently of the lending function, management
monitors the loan portfolio to identify risk on a monthly basis so that an appropriate allowance is maintained. Based on an evaluation of the
loan portfolio, management presents a monthly review of the allowance for loan and lease losses to the Board of Directors, indicating any
changes in the allowance since the last review. In making the evaluation, management considers the results of recent regulatory examinations,
which typically include a review of the allowance for loan and lease losses an integral part of the examination process.
In establishing the allowance, management evaluates on a quantitative basis individual classified loans and nonaccrual loans, and determines an
aggregate reserve for those loans based on that review. In addition, an allowance for the remainder of the loan and lease portfolio is determined
based on historical loss experience within certain components of the portfolio. These allocations may be modified if current conditions indicate
that loan and lease losses may differ from historical experience.
In addition, a portion of the allowance is established for losses inherent in the loan and lease portfolio which have not been identified by the
quantitative processes described above. This determination inherently involves a higher degree of subjectivity, and considers risk factors that
may not have yet manifested themselves in historical loss experience. These factors include:
• Changes in local, regional, and national economic and business conditions affecting the collectability of the portfolio, the values of
underlying collateral, and the condition of various market segments.
• Changes in the volume and severity of past due loans, the volume of nonaccrual loans, and the volume and severity of adversely
classified loans.
• Changes in the experience, ability, and depth of lending management and other relevant staff as well as the quality of the institution’s
loan review system.
• Changes in the nature and volume of the portfolio and the terms of loans generally offered.
32
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
•
The existence and effect of any concentrations of credit and changes in the level of such concentrations.
While the allowance for loan and lease losses is maintained at a level believed to be adequate by management for covering estimated losses in
the loan and lease portfolio, determination of the allowance is inherently subjective, as it requires estimates, all of which may be susceptible to
significant change. Changes in these estimates may impact the provisions charged to expense in future periods.
Management believes, based on information currently available, that the allowance for loan and lease losses of $7,061,000 is adequate as of
December 31, 2010.
The allocation of the allowance for loan and lease losses among the major classifications is shown in Table 12 as of December 31 of each of the
past five years.
TABLE 12: ALLOCATION OF THE ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES
(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial real estate, construction
and land development
Commercial, industrial and agricultural
Real estate - residential
Consumer
General
2010
2009
December 31,
2008
2007
2006
$
$
$
$
$
3,002
3,246
206
412
195
7,061
3,334
3,545
175
467
165
7,686
3,326
1,860
87
172
60
5,505
2,908
1,607
75
148
52
4,790
2,462
1,515
54
124
32
4,187
$
$
$
$
$
The 2010 provision of $2,635,000 is a decrease of $6,885,000 from the $9,520,000 provision in 2009. The smaller provision is reflective of the
aggressive loan charge-offs taken at the end of 2009, resulting from the deterioration in the overall quality of our loan portfolio caused by the
recession and problems in the commercial real estate sector. The continued slowness in the economy and continuing credit quality concerns of
Mid Penn’s loan portfolio during 2010 necessitated larger than historically normal provision levels, even though the amount was a reduction
from 2009.
The allowance for loan and lease losses at December 31, 2010 was $7,061,000, or 1.51% of total loans less unearned discount as compared to
$7,686,000, or 1.60% at December 31, 2009 and $5,505,000, or 1.27% at December 31, 2008.
Deposits and Other Funding Sources
Mid Penn's primary source of funds are deposits. Total deposits at December 31, 2010, increased by $54,967,000 or 11.0% over December 31,
2009, which increased by $63,191,000 or 14.5% over December 31, 2008. Average balances and average interest rates applicable to the major
classifications of deposits for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 are presented in Table 13.
Average short-term borrowings for 2010 were $3,798,000 as compared to $19,715,000 in 2009. These borrowings included customer
repurchase agreements, treasury tax and loan note option borrowings and federal funds purchased. Two $5,000,000 long-term borrowings
matured in 2010, while no new long-term borrowing arrangements were entered into during the year.
At December 31, 2010, the Bank had $16,494,000 in brokered deposits. With additional success in the local deposit environment, the Bank
reduced its brokered deposit funding by $11,395,000 in 2010, after having reduced such funding by $18,219,000 in 2009.
33
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
TABLE 13: DEPOSITS BY MAJOR CLASSIFICATION
(Dollars in thousands)
2010
Average
Balance
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits
Interest-bearing demand deposits
Money market
Savings
Time
$
58,480
48,024
163,415
26,585
239,761
536,265
$
Average
Rate
0.00%
0.14%
1.44%
0.06%
2.87%
1.74%
December 31,
2009
Average
Balance
$
51,464
38,198
87,427
26,241
255,123
458,453
$
Average
Rate
0.00%
0.09%
1.58%
0.06%
3.64%
2.34%
The maturity distribution of time deposits of $100,000 or more is reflected in Table 14.
TABLE 14: MATURITY OF TIME DEPOSITS $100,000 OR MORE
2008
Average
Balance
$
47,274
36,551
69,251
25,607
230,773
409,456
$
Average
Rate
0.00%
0.30%
2.10%
0.25%
4.29%
2.82%
(Dollars in thousands)
Three months or less
Over three months to twelve months
Over twelve months
Capital Resources
2010
December 31,
2009
2008
$
$
$
7,322
21,031
37,870
66,223
22,712
37,443
25,682
85,837
$
$
$
12,446
38,264
22,682
73,392
Shareholders' equity, or capital, is evaluated in relation to total assets and the risk associated with those assets. The detailed computation of the
Bank’s regulatory capital ratios can be found in Note 17 of Item 8, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The greater a corporation’s
capital resources, the more likely it is to meet its cash obligations and absorb unforeseen losses. Too much capital, however, indicates that not
enough of the corporation’s earnings have been paid to shareholders and the buildup makes it difficult for a corporation to offer a competitive
return on the shareholders’ capital going forward. For these reasons capital adequacy has been, and will continue to be, of paramount
importance.
Capital growth is achieved primarily by retaining more earnings than are paid out to shareholders. Shareholders’ equity increased in 2010 by
$1,497,000 or 3.2%, following a decrease in 2009 of $4,186,000 or 8.2% and an increase in 2008 of $10,466,000 or 25.8%. Capital was
positively impacted in 2010 by the net income of $2,234,000 and the continued suspension of the common dividend to shareholders. Capital
was negatively impacted in 2009 by the net loss of $2,809,000 and the payment of cash dividends to common shareholders of $1,809,000.
Capital was positively impacted in 2008 by the addition of $10,000,000 from the U.S. Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program. The program was
designed to provide well-capitalized, secure financial institutions with additional capital in order to increase the flow of credit into the economy.
The program details are discussed in the following section.
Mid Penn’s normal intent for dividend payout is to provide quarterly cash returns to shareholders and earnings retention at a level sufficient to
finance future growth. During the fourth quarter of 2009, Mid Penn suspended the quarterly cash dividend consistent with Federal Reserve
Board policy that dividend payouts should not exceed net income for the previous four quarters, net of dividends paid during that period. Mid
Penn continued the suspension of the quarterly cash dividend to shareholders throughout 2010, consistent with Federal Reserve Board policy.
On January 26, 2011, Mid Penn declared a cash dividend of $0.05 per common share, payable on February 28, 2011 to shareholders of record as
of February 9, 2011.
The dividend payout ratio, which represents the percentage of annual net income returned to shareholders in the form of cash dividends, was
77% for 2008.
In December of 2008, Mid Penn retired its treasury stock.
Capital Purchase Program Participation
On December 19, 2008, Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (the “Corporation”) entered into an agreement (including the Securities Purchase Agreement –
Standard Terms) (the “Purchase Agreement”) with the United States Department of the Treasury (the “Treasury”) pursuant to which the
Treasury invested $10,000,000 in the Corporation under the Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program (the “CPP”).
34
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Under the Purchase Agreement, the Treasury received (1) 10,000 shares of Series A Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, $1,000
liquidation preference, and (2) Warrants to purchase up to 73,099 shares of the Corporation’s common stock at an exercise price of $20.52 per
share.
The preferred shares pay cumulative dividends at a rate of 5% per annum for the first five years and 9% per annum thereafter. The preferred
shares are non-voting, other than class voting rights on certain matters that could adversely affect the preferred shares. If dividends on the
preferred shares have not been paid for an aggregate of six quarterly dividend periods or more, whether consecutive or not, the Corporation’s
authorized number of directors will automatically be increased by two, and holders of the preferred stock, voting together with holders of any
then outstanding parity stock, will have the right to elect those directors at the Corporation’s next annual meeting of shareholders or special
meeting of shareholders called for that purpose. These preferred share directors would be elected annually and serve until all accrued and
unpaid dividends on the preferred shares have been paid.
Pursuant to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”), the Secretary of the Treasury shall permit, subject to consultation
with the appropriate Federal banking agency, the Corporation to redeem the Series A Preferred Stock. The Corporation may do so without
regard to the source of the funds to be used to redeem the Series A Preferred Stock or any minimum waiting period. If the Corporation elects to
redeem the Series A Preferred Stock prior to February 15, 2012, and receives approval from the Treasury and the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System, it must redeem at least $2,500,000 of the Series A Preferred Stock. Upon redemption of the Series A Preferred Stock,
the Secretary of the Treasury is required to liquidate the warrants associated with the Corporation’s participation in the CPP at the current
market price. Any redemption is subject to the consent of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Until December 19, 2011, or
such earlier time as all preferred shares have been redeemed by the Corporation or transferred by Treasury to third parties that are not affiliated
with Treasury, the Corporation may not, without Treasury’s consent, increase its dividend rate per share of common stock above the per share
quarterly amount in effect immediately prior to October 14, 2008 ($0.20 per share) or, with certain limited exceptions, repurchase its common
stock.
The warrants are immediately exercisable and have a 10-year term. The exercise price and number of shares subject to the warrants are both
subject to anti-dilution adjustments. Treasury has agreed not to exercise voting power with respect to any shares of common stock issued upon
exercise of the warrants; however, this agreement not to vote the shares does not apply to any person who may acquire such shares.
The preferred shares and the warrants were issued in a private placement exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act
of 1933. The Corporation has filed a shelf registration statement covering the preferred shares, the warrants, and the common stock underlying
the warrants. Treasury and other future holders of the preferred shares, the warrants, or the common stock issued pursuant to the warrants also
have piggyback and demand registration rights with respect to these securities. None of the preferred shares, the warrants, or the shares issuable
upon exercise of the warrants are subject to any contractual restrictions on transfer.
In the Purchase Agreement, the Corporation agreed that, until such time as the Treasury ceases to own any securities acquired from Mid Penn
pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Corporation will take all necessary action to ensure that benefit plans with respect to our senior
executive officers comply with Section 111(b) of the Emergency Economic Stability Act of 2008 (the “EESA”) and applicable guidance or
regulations issued by the Secretary of the Treasury. The applicable executive compensation requirements apply to the compensation of the
Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, and certain other highly compensated executive officers.
These requirements, the compliance of which must be annually certified by Mid Penn’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer,
include:
1.
2.
3.
4.
limits on compensation that exclude incentives for senior executive officers of Mid Penn to take unnecessary and excessive risks that
threaten the value of Mid Penn during the period in which any obligation arising from financial assistance provided under the TARP
remains outstanding;
a provision for the recovery by Mid Penn of any bonus, retention award, or incentive compensation paid to a senior executive officer
and any of the next 20 most highly-compensated employees of Mid Penn based on statements of earnings, revenues, gains, or other
criteria that are later found to be materially inaccurate;
a prohibition on Mid Penn making any golden parachute payment to a senior executive officer or any of the next five most highly-
compensated employees of Mid Penn during the period in which any obligation arising from financial assistance provided under the
TARP remains outstanding;
a prohibition on Mid Penn paying or accruing any bonus, retention award, or incentive compensation to the most highly compensated
employees of Mid Penn during the period in which any obligation arising from financial assistance provided under the TARP remains
outstanding, except that any prohibition shall not apply to the payment of long-term restricted stock by Mid Penn, provided that such
long-term restricted stock –
35
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
i.
ii.
iii.
Does not fully vest during the period in which any obligation arising from financial assistance provided to Mid Penn
remains outstanding;
Has a value in an amount that is not greater than one-third of the total amount of annual compensation of the employee
receiving the stock; and
Is subject to such other terms and conditions as the Secretary of the Treasury may determine is in the public interest;
5.
6.
a prohibition on any compensation plan that would encourage manipulation of the reported earnings of Mid Penn to enhance the
compensation of any of its employees; and
a requirement that Mid Penn’s compensation committee remains entirely independent and meets at least semiannually to discuss and
evaluate employee compensation plans in light of an assessment of any risk posed to Mid Penn from such plans.
In compliance with the EESA and ARRA, on February 27, 2009, Rory G. Ritrievi entered into a Capital Purchase Plan Executive Compensation
Restriction Agreement with Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. and Mid Penn Bank (the "Agreement"). The Agreement prohibits, during the period which
any obligation to the Federal Government remains outstanding, any payment to Mr. Ritrievi (including bonus payments and payments upon a
termination) which would violate the EESA and ARRA, despite Mr. Ritrievi having an employment agreement requiring payments upon certain
terminations.
In addition to these requirements, Mid Penn must have in place a company-wide policy regarding excessive or luxury expenditures and must
permit a separate nonbinding shareholder vote to approve the compensation of executives as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure
rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Mid Penn has adopted such a luxury and expense policy and it appears on the Corporation’s
website at www.midpennbank.com.
Federal Income Taxes
Federal income tax expense for 2010 was $416,000 compared to a federal income tax benefit of $2,208,000 in 2009 and an expense of
$1,104,000 in 2008. The effective tax rate was 13% for 2010, 49% for 2009, and 24% for 2008.
The tax expense in 2010 resulted from net income generated in the normal course of business. The tax benefit recorded in 2009 was related to a
loss stemming from the increased provision for loan losses and increased noninterest expenses during 2009 versus 2008. Generally, our
effective tax rate is below the statutory rate due to earnings on tax-exempt loans, investments, and bank-owned life insurance, and the impact of
tax credits. The realization of deferred tax assets is dependent on future earnings. As a result of Mid Penn’s adoption of ASC Topic 740,
Income Taxes, no significant income tax uncertainties were identified; therefore, Mid Penn recognized no adjustment for unrealized income tax
benefits for the periods ended December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009. We currently anticipate that future earnings will be adequate to fully
utilize deferred tax assets.
Liquidity
Mid Penn's asset-liability management policy addresses the management of Mid Penn's liquidity position and its ability to raise sufficient funds
to meet deposit withdrawals, fund loan growth and meet other operational needs. Mid Penn utilizes its investments as a source of liquidity,
along with deposit growth and increases in repurchase agreements and borrowings. (See Deposits and Other Funding Sources which appears
earlier in this discussion.) Liquidity from investments is provided primarily through investments and interest-bearing balances with maturities
of one year or less. Funds are available to Mid Penn through loans from the Federal Home Loan Bank and established federal funds (overnight)
lines of credit. Mid Penn's major source of funds is its core deposit base.
Major sources of cash in 2010 came from the net increase in deposits of $54,967,000, as well as the proceeds from the maturity of investment
securities of $8,982,000 and the decrease in loans and leases of $8,690,000.
The major uses of cash in 2010 were the purchase of investment securities of $33,472,000 and the reduction in short-term borrowings and long-
term debt of $14,483,000 and $10,174,000, respectively. Another major use of cash in 2010 was the increase in interest-bearing balances of
$16,437,000.
Major sources of cash in 2009 came from the net increase in deposits of $63,191,000, as well as the proceeds from investment securities and
interest-bearing balances of $15,360,000 and $11,472,000, respectively.
The major use of cash in 2009 was the net increase in loans and leases of $53,528,000. Another major use of cash in 2009 was the repayment of
$17,166,000 in long-term debt. Other significant uses of cash included the purchase of investment securities of $9,354,000, the purchase of
premises and equipment of $2,647,000, and the payment of $1,809,000 in common stock cash dividends.
36
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Aggregate Contractual Obligations
Table 15 represents Mid Penn’s on-and-off balance sheet aggregate contractual obligations to make future payments as of December 31, 2010:
TABLE 15: AGGREGATE CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
(Dollars in thousands)
Certificates of deposit
Short-term borrowings
Long-term debt
Operating lease obligations
Payments under benefit plans
Note
Reference
9
10
11
19
13
Payments Due by Period
One Year or
Less
One to Three
Years
Three to Five
Years
$
$
$
$
Total
213,774
1,561
27,883
277
1,583
245,078
79,226
1,561
5,000
66
107
85,960
94,988
-
14,236
127
236
109,587
More than
Five Years
1,494
$
-
3,647
-
935
6,076
$
38,066
-
5,000
84
305
43,455
$
$
$
$
We are not aware of any other commitments or contingent liabilities which may have a material adverse impact on Mid Penn’s liquidity or
capital resources.
Effects of Inflation
A bank's asset and liability structure is substantially different from that of an industrial company in that virtually all assets and liabilities of a
bank are monetary in nature. Management believes the impact of inflation on its financial results depends principally upon Mid Penn's ability to
manage the balance sheet sensitivity to changes in interest rates and, by such reaction, mitigate the inflationary impact on performance. Interest
rates do not necessarily move in the same direction or at the same magnitude as the prices of other goods and services. As discussed previously,
Management seeks to manage the relationship between interest sensitive assets and liabilities in order to protect against wide interest rate
fluctuations, including those resulting from inflation.
Information shown elsewhere in this Annual Report will assist in the understanding of how Mid Penn is positioned to react to changing interest
rates and inflationary trends. In particular, the summary of net liabilities, as well as the composition of loans, investments and deposits should
be considered.
Off-Balance Sheet Items
Mid Penn makes contractual commitments to extend credit and extends lines of credit, which are subject to Mid Penn's credit approval and
monitoring procedures.
As of December 31, 2010, commitments to extend credit amounted to $86,141,000 as compared to $116,486,000 as of December 31, 2009.
Mid Penn also issues financial standby letters of credit to its customers. The risk associated with financial standby letters of credit is essentially
the same as the credit risk involved in loan extensions to customers. Financial standby letters of credit decreased to $10,048,000 at December
31, 2010, from $10,697,000 at December 31, 2009.
Comprehensive (Loss) Income
Comprehensive (Loss) Income is a measure of all changes in equity of a corporation, excluding transactions with owners in their capacity as
owners (such as proceeds from issuances of stock and dividends). The difference between Net Income (Loss) and Comprehensive (Loss)
Income is termed “Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income.” For Mid Penn, Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income consists primarily of unrealized
gains and losses on available for sale securities, net of deferred income tax. Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income also includes a pension
component in accordance with ASC Topic 715. Comprehensive (Loss) Income should not be construed to be a measure of Net Income (Loss).
The amount of unrealized gains or losses reflected in Comprehensive (Loss) Income may vary widely at statement dates depending on the
markets as a whole and how interest rate movements affect the market value of the portfolio of available for sale securities. Other
Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was ($737,000), $369,000, and $120,000, respectively.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
As a financial institution, Mid Penn’s primary source of market risk is interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is the exposure to fluctuations in Mid
Penn’s future earnings (earnings at risk) resulting from changes in interest rates. This exposure or sensitivity is a function of the repricing
characteristics of Mid Penn's portfolio of assets and liabilities. Each asset and liability reprices either at maturity or during the life of the
37
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis
instrument. Interest rate sensitivity is measured as the difference between the volume of assets and liabilities that are subject to repricing in a
future period of time.
The principal purpose of asset-liability management is to maximize current and future net interest income within acceptable levels of interest
rate risk while satisfying liquidity and capital requirements. Net interest income is increased by increasing the net interest margin and by
volume growth. Thus the goal of interest rate risk management is to maintain a balance between risk and reward such that net interest income is
maximized while risk is maintained at an acceptable level.
Mid Penn utilizes an asset-liability management model to measure the impact of interest rate movements on its interest rate sensitivity position.
Mid Penn’s management also reviews the traditional maturity gap analysis regularly. Mid Penn does not always attempt to achieve an exact
match between interest sensitive assets and liabilities because it believes that an actively managed amount of interest rate risk is inherent and
appropriate in the management of the Corporation’s profitability.
Modeling techniques and simulation analysis involve assumptions and estimates that inherently cannot be measured with complete precision.
Key assumptions in the analyses include maturity and repricing characteristics of assets and liabilities, prepayments on amortizing assets, non-
maturing deposit sensitivity, and loan and deposit pricing. These assumptions are inherently uncertain due to the timing, magnitude and
frequency of rate changes and changes in market conditions and management strategies, among other factors. However, the analyses are useful
in quantifying risk and provide a relative gauge of Mid Penn’s interest rate risk position over time.
Management reviews interest rate risk on a quarterly basis. This analysis includes earnings scenarios whereby interest rates are increased and
decreased by 100, 200, and 300 basis points. These scenarios, detailed in Table 16, indicate that there would not be a significant variance in net
interest income over a one-year time frame due to interest rate changes; however, actual results could vary significantly from the calculations
prepared by Management. At December 31, 2010, all interest rate risk levels according to the model were within the tolerance limits of Board
approved policy. In addition, the table does not take into consideration changes, which Management would make to realign its portfolio in the
event of a changing rate environment.
TABLE 16: EFFECT OF HYPOTHETICAL CHANGES IN INTEREST RATES
December 31, 2010
% Change in
Net Interest
Income
4.84%
3.32%
1.72%
-1.87%
-3.89%
-5.88%
Change in
Basis Points
300
200
100
0
(100)
(200)
(300)
Risk Limit
+/- 25%
+/- 15%
+/- 10%
+/- 10%
+/- 15%
+/- 25%
December 31, 2009
% Change in
Net Interest
Income
12.59%
8.42%
4.17%
-4.17%
-8.41%
-12.59%
Change in
Basis Points
300
200
100
0
(100)
(200)
(300)
Risk Limit
+/- 25%
+/- 15%
+/- 10%
+/- 10%
+/- 15%
+/- 25%
38
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The following audited financial statements are set forth in this Annual Report of Form 10-K on the following pages:
Index to Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
40
41
42
43
44
46
39
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders
Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. and subsidiaries
(the “Corporation”) as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period
ended December 31, 2010. The Corporation’s management is responsible for these consolidated financial
statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The
Corporation is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of their December 31, 2010
internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial
reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of the Corporation as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2010 in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
ParenteBeard LLC
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
March 21, 2011
40
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2010
December 31, 2009
$
$
6,779
884
5,238
12,901
55,041
70,702
467,735
(7,061)
460,674
13,185
3,828
596
2,632
2,875
1,016
351
7,638
6,018
637,457
7,526
1,434
-
8,960
38,604
47,345
480,385
(7,686)
472,699
12,904
4,029
663
2,781
2,257
1,016
369
7,368
7,015
606,010
$
$
$
60,228
44,578
209,936
26,466
213,774
554,982
1,561
27,883
1,111
3,719
589,256
$
55,943
42,148
107,295
26,169
268,460
500,015
16,044
38,057
1,750
3,440
559,306
10,000
10,000
3,480
29,810
4,875
36
48,201
637,457
$
3,480
29,824
2,627
773
46,704
606,010
$
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks
Interest-bearing balances with other financial institutions
Federal funds sold
Total cash and cash equivalents
Interest-bearing time deposits with other financial institutions
Available for sale investment securities
Loans and leases, net of unearned interest
Less: Allowance for loan and lease losses
Net loans and leases
Bank premises and equipment, net
Restricted investment in bank stocks
Foreclosed assets held for sale
Accrued interest receivable
Deferred income taxes
Goodwill
Core deposit and other intangibles, net
Cash surrender value of life insurance
Other assets
Total Assets
LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits:
Noninterest bearing demand
Interest bearing demand
Money Market
Savings
Time
Total Deposits
Short-term borrowings
Long-term debt
Accrued interest payable
Other liabilities
Total Liabilities
Shareholders' Equity:
Preferred stock, par value $1,000; authorized 10,000,000 shares; 5% cumulative
dividend; 10,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009
Common stock, par value $1 per share; 10,000,000 shares authorized; 3,479,780
shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009
Additional paid-in capital
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive income
Total Shareholders’ Equity
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
41
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
INTEREST INCOME
Interest & fees on loans and leases
Interest on interest-bearing balances
Interest and dividends on investment securities:
U.S. Treasury and government agencies
State and political subdivision obligations, tax-exempt
Other securities
Interest on federal funds sold and securities purchased
under agreements to resell
Total Interest Income
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest on deposits
Interest on short-term borrowings
Interest on long-term debt
Total Interest Expense
Net Interest Income
PROVISION FOR LOAN AND LEASE LOSSES
Net Interest Income After Provision for Loan and Lease Losses
NONINTEREST INCOME
Trust department income
Service charges on deposits
Earnings from cash surrender value of life insurance
Gain on life insurance proceeds
Mortgage banking income
Other income
Total Noninterest Income
NONINTEREST EXPENSE
Salaries and employee benefits
Severance expense
Occupancy expense, net
Equipment expense
Pennsylvania Bank Shares tax expense
FDIC Assessment
Legal and professional fees
Director fees and benefits expense
Marketing and advertising expense
Computer expense
Telephone expense
Loss on sale/write-down of foreclosed assets
Intangible amortization
Other expenses
Total Noninterest Expense
INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE PROVISION FOR (BENEFIT FROM)
INCOME TAXES
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
NET INCOME (LOSS)
Preferred stock dividends and discount accretion
NET INCOME (LOSS) AVAILABLE TO COMMON SHAREHOLDERS
PER COMMON SHARE DATA:
Basic Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
Diluted Earnings (Loss) Per Common Share
Cash Dividends
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
42
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Years Ended December 31,
2009
2008
2010
$
27,397
818
$
28,039
1,460
$
27,141
2,499
788
1,108
12
25
30,148
9,319
18
1,305
10,642
19,506
2,635
16,871
200
1,139
270
-
423
1,382
3,414
8,760
-
916
1,361
443
897
529
304
299
578
362
283
65
2,324
17,121
652
1,171
13
1
31,336
10,726
112
2,466
13,304
18,032
9,520
8,512
243
1,479
280
158
124
1,372
3,656
8,173
-
844
1,170
366
1,163
814
293
679
393
344
110
65
2,257
16,671
819
1,251
146
-
31,856
11,532
608
2,750
14,890
16,966
1,230
15,736
313
1,654
267
-
78
1,370
3,682
7,197
478
967
870
315
116
769
354
525
319
193
281
66
2,276
14,726
3,164
416
2,748
514
2,234
$
(4,503)
(2,208)
(2,295)
514
(2,809)
$
4,692
1,104
3,588
16
3,572
$
$
0.64
0.64
0.00
$
(0.81)
(0.81)
0.52
$
1.03
1.03
0.80
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
FOR YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2010, 2009 AND 2008
(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
Preferred Common
Stock
Stock
Additional
Paid-in
Capital
Retained
Earnings
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
Treasury
Stock
Total
Shareholders'
Equity
Balance, December 31, 2007
Cumulative effect adjustment of accounting
principle adoption of ASC Topic 715
Balance, January 1, 2008
Comprehensive income:
Net income
Change in net unrealized gain (loss) on securities
available for sale, net of reclassification
adjustment and tax effects
Total comprehensive income
Cash dividends ($0.80 per share)
Issuance of preferred stock and warrants
Accrued preferred dividends
Purchase of treasury stock (9,854 shares)
Cancellation of treasury stock
Balance, December 31, 2008
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss
Change in net unrealized gain (loss) on securities
available for sale, net of reclassification
adjustment and tax effects
Defined benefit plans, net of tax effects
Total comprehensive loss
Cash dividends ($0.52 per share)
Preferred dividends
Amortization of warrant cost
Balance, December 31, 2009
Comprehensive income:
Net income
Change in net unrealized gain (loss) on securities
available for sale, net of reclassification
adjustment and tax effects
Defined benefit plans, net of tax effects
Total comprehensive income
Preferred dividends
Amortization of warrant cost
Balance, December 31, 2010
$0
$3,533
$31,107
$6,660
$284
($1,140)
$40,444
-
-
-
-
-
3,533
-
31,107
-
-
-
-
10,000
-
-
-
10,000
-
-
-
(53)
3,480
70
-
-
(1,339)
29,838
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
10,000
-
-
3,480
-
(14)
29,824
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(277)
6,383
3,588
-
(2,787)
-
(16)
-
-
7,168
(2,295)
-
-
(1,809)
(437)
-
2,627
2,748
-
-
-
-
$10,000
-
-
$3,480
-
(14)
$29,810
(500)
-
$4,875
-
284
-
120
-
-
-
-
404
-
263
106
-
-
773
-
(641)
(96)
-
-
$36
-
(1,140)
-
-
-
-
(252)
1,392
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
$0
(277)
40,167
3,588
120
3,708
(2,787)
10,070
(16)
(252)
-
50,890
(2,295)
263
106
(1,926)
(1,809)
(437)
(14)
46,704
2,748
(641)
(96)
2,011
(500)
(14)
$48,201
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
43
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in thousands)
Operating Activities:
Net Income (Loss)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Provision for loan and lease losses
Depreciation
Amortization of core deposit intangible
Net amortization (accretion) of security premiums (discounts)
Earnings on cash surrender value of life insurance
Gain from life insurance proceeds
Loss on disposal of property, plant, and equipment
Loss on sale / write-down of foreclosed assets
Deferred income tax benefit
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable
Decrease (increase) in other assets
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities
Investing Activities:
Net (increase) decrease in interest-bearing balances
Proceeds from the maturity of investment securities
Purchases of investment securities
Redemptions (purchases) of restricted investment in bank stock
Net decrease (increase) in loans and leases
Purchases of bank premises and equipment
Proceeds from sale of foreclosed assets
Proceeds from cash surrender value of life insurance
Net Cash Used In Investing Activities
Financing Activities:
Net increase in demand deposits and savings accounts
Net (decrease) increase in time deposits
Net decrease in short-term borrowings
Issued senior preferred stock
Preferred stock dividend paid
Common stock dividend paid
Long-term debt repayment
Purchase of treasury stock
Proceeds from long-term debt
Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
Years Ended December 31,
2009
2008
2010
$
2,748
$
(2,295)
$
3,588
2,635
1,302
18
162
(270)
-
4
283
(288)
149
887
(639)
279
7,270
(16,437)
8,982
(33,472)
201
8,690
(1,587)
484
-
(33,139)
9,520
1,115
37
(212)
(280)
(158)
5
110
(243)
(34)
(4,593)
(661)
(218)
2,093
11,472
15,360
(9,354)
(411)
(53,528)
(2,647)
1,190
507
(37,411)
1,230
848
66
(9)
(476)
-
-
281
(160)
71
(828)
421
805
5,837
(3,263)
18,420
(16,897)
(3,618)
(59,546)
(1,587)
248
-
(66,243)
109,653
(54,686)
(14,483)
-
(500)
-
(10,174)
-
-
29,810
3,941
8,960
12,901
$
42,791
20,400
(7,933)
-
(453)
(1,809)
(17,166)
-
-
35,830
512
8,448
8,960
$
17,962
46,045
(13,372)
10,000
-
(2,787)
(15,153)
(252)
15,795
58,238
(2,168)
10,616
8,448
$
44
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Dollars in thousands)
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Interest paid
Income taxes paid
Supplemental Noncash Disclosures:
Transfers to foreclosed assets held for sale
Warrants issued
Cancelled treasury stock
Preferred dividend accrued
Years Ended December 31,
2009
2008
2010
$
$
11,281
510
$
$
13,965
50
$
$
14,469
1,720
$
700
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
447
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
$
$
$
1,556
70
1,392
16
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
45
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(1)
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. and its wholly-owned
subsidiaries Mid Penn Bank (“Bank”), Mid Penn Investment Corporation and Mid Penn Insurance Services, LLC, (collectively, “Mid
Penn”). All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
For comparative purposes, the December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 balances have been reclassified to conform to the 2010
presentation. Such reclassifications had no impact on net income.
Mid Penn has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to the balance sheet date of December 31, 2010, for items that
should potentially be recognized or disclosed in these consolidated financial statements. The evaluation was conducted through the
date these consolidated financial statements were issued.
(2)
Nature of Business
The Bank engages in a full-service commercial banking and trust business, making available to the community a wide range of
financial services, including, but not limited to, installment loans, mortgage and home equity loans, secured and unsecured
commercial and consumer loans, lines of credit, construction financing, farm loans, community development loans, loans to non-profit
entities and local government loans and various types of time and demand deposits, including but not limited to, checking accounts,
savings accounts, clubs, money market deposit accounts, certificates of deposit and IRAs. In addition, the Bank provides a full range
of trust services through its Trust Department. Deposits are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) to the
extent provided by law.
The financial services are provided to individuals, partnerships, non-profit organizations, and corporations through its fourteen offices
located in Dauphin County, the southern portion of Northumberland County, the western portion of Schuylkill County and the eastern
portion of Cumberland County.
A decision was made to close the Mid Penn Investment Corporation, effective August 31, 2010 due to a lack of activity within the
subsidiary.
Mid Penn Insurance Services, LLC provides title insurance. Due to the lack of activity within this subsidiary, the decision was made
to exit this line of business effective December 31, 2009.
(3)
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accounting and reporting policies of Mid Penn conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (“GAAP”) and to general practice within the financial industry. The following is a description of the more significant
accounting policies.
(a)
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change relate to the determination of the allowance for loan
and lease losses, the valuation of deferred tax assets, the assessment of other-than-temporary impairment of investment
securities, core deposit intangible and goodwill valuation, and the potential impairment of restricted stock.
(b)
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, cash and cash equivalents include cash on hand, balances due
from banks, and federal funds sold, all of which mature within ninety days.
(c)
Investment Securities
Available for Sale Securities - includes debt and equity securities. Debt and equity securities are reported at fair value, with
unrealized holding gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported, net of deferred income taxes, as a component of
accumulated other comprehensive income within shareholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses on sales of investment
securities are computed on the basis of specific identification of the cost of each security. Mid Penn had no trading
securities or held to maturity securities in 2010 or 2009.
46
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(d)
Loans
Loans receivable that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff are
stated at their outstanding unpaid principal balances, net of an allowance for loan losses and any deferred fees or costs.
Interest income is accrued on the unpaid principal balance. Loan origination fees, net of certain direct origination costs, are
deferred and recognized as an adjustment of the yield (interest income) of the related loans. These amounts are generally
being amortized over the contractual life of the loan. Premiums and discounts on purchased loans are amortized as
adjustments to interest income using the effective yield method.
The loan portfolio is segmented into commercial and consumer loans. Commercial loans consist of the following classes:
commercial and industrial, commercial real estate, commercial real estate-construction and lease financing. Consumer loans
consist of the following classes: residential mortgage loans, home equity loans and other consumer loans.
For all classes of loans, the accrual of interest is discontinued when the contractual payment of principal or interest has
become 90 days or more past due or management has serious doubts about further collectability of principal or interest, even
though the loan is currently performing. A loan may remain on accrual status if it is in the process of collection and is either
guaranteed or well secured. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, unpaid interest credited to income in the current
year is reversed and unpaid interest accrued in prior years is charged against the allowance for loan and lease losses. Interest
received on nonaccrual loans, including impaired loans, generally is either applied against principal or reported as interest
income, according to management’s judgment as to the collectability of principal. Generally, loans are restored to accrual
status when the obligation is brought current, has performed in accordance with the contractual terms for a reasonable period
of time (generally six months) and the ultimate collectability of the total contractual principal and interest is no longer in
doubt. The past due status of all classes of loans receivable is determined based on contractual due dates for loan payments.
(e)
Allowance for Credit Losses
Commercial and industrial
Mid Penn originates commercial and industrial loans. Most of the Bank’s commercial and industrial loans have been
extended to finance local and regional businesses and include short-term loans to finance machinery and equipment
purchases, inventory, and accounts receivable. Commercial loans also involve the extension of revolving credit for a
combination of equipment acquisitions and working capital in expanding companies.
The maximum term for loans extended on machinery and equipment is based on the projected useful life of such machinery
and equipment. Generally, the maximum term on non-mortgage lines of credit is one year. The loan-to-value ratio on such
loans and lines of credit generally may not exceed 80% of the value of the collateral securing the loan. The Bank’s
commercial business lending policy includes credit file documentation and analysis of the borrower’s character, capacity to
repay the loan, the adequacy of the borrower’s capital and collateral as well as an evaluation of conditions affecting the
borrower. Analysis of the borrower’s past, present, and future cash flows is also an important aspect of the Bank’s current
credit analysis. Nonetheless, such loans are believed to carry higher credit risk than more traditional investments.
Commercial and industrial loans typically are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from the cash
flow of the borrower’s business. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial business loans may
be substantially dependent on the success of the business itself, which, in turn, is likely to be dependent upon the general
economic environment. Mid Penn’s commercial and industrial loans are usually, but not always, secured by business assets
and personal guarantees. However, the collateral securing the loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise,
and may fluctuate in value based on the success of the business.
Commercial real estate and commercial real estate - construction
Commercial real estate and commercial real estate construction loans generally present a higher level of risk than loans
secured by one to four family residences. This greater risk is due to several factors, including the concentration of principal
in a limited number of loans and borrowers, the effect of general economic conditions on income producing properties, and
the increased difficulty of evaluating and monitoring these types of loans. In addition, the repayment of loans secured by
commercial real estate is typically dependent upon the successful operation of the related real estate project. If the cash flow
from the project is reduced, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan may be impaired.
Lease financing
Mid Penn originates leases for select commercial and state and municipal government lessees. The nature of the leased asset
is often subject to rapid depreciation in salvage value over a relatively short time frame or may be of an industry specific
nature, making appraisal or liquidation of the asset difficult. These factors have led the Bank to severely curtain the
47
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
origination of new leases to state or municipal government agencies where default risk is extremely limited and to only the
most credit-worthy commercial customers. These commercial customers are primarily leasing fleet vehicles for use in their
primary line of business, mitigating some of the asset value concerns within the portfolio. Leasing has been a declining
percentage of the Mid Penn’s portfolio since 2006, declining 59% during that period.
Residential mortgage
Mid Penn offers a wide array of residential mortgage loans for both permanent structures and those under construction. The
Bank’s residential mortgage originations are secured primarily by properties located in its primary market and surrounding
areas. Residential mortgage loans have terms up to a maximum of 30 years and with loan to value ratios up to 100% of the
lesser of the appraised value of the security property or the contract price. Private mortgage insurance is generally required
in an amount sufficient to reduce the Bank’s exposure to at or below the 85% loan to value level. Residential mortgage
loans generally do not include prepayment penalties.
In underwriting residential mortgage loans, the Bank evaluates both the borrower’s ability to make monthly payments and
the value of the property securing the loan. Most properties securing real estate loans made by Mid Penn are appraised by
independent fee appraisers. The Bank generally requires borrowers to obtain an attorney’s title opinion or title insurance
and fire and property insurance (including flood insurance, if necessary) in an amount not less than the amount of the loan.
Real estate loans originated by the Bank generally contain a “due on sale” clause allowing the Bank to declare the unpaid
principal balance due and payable upon the sale of the security property.
The Bank underwrites residential mortgage loans to the standards established by the secondary mortgage market, i.e., Fannie
Mae, Ginnie Mae, Freddie Mac, or Pennsylvania Housing Finance Agency standards, with the intention of selling the
majority of residential mortgages originated into the secondary market. In the event that the facts and circumstances
surrounding a residential mortgage application do not meet all underwriting conditions of the secondary mortgage market,
the Bank will evaluate the failed conditions and evaluate the potential risk of holding the residential mortgage in the Bank’s
portfolio rather than rejecting the loan request. In the event that the loan is held in the Bank’s portfolio, the interest rate on
the residential mortgage would be increased to compensate for the added portfolio risk.
Consumer, including home equity
Mid Penn offers a variety of secured consumer loans, including home equity, automobile, and deposit secured loans. In
addition, the Bank offers other secured and unsecured consumer loans. Most consumer loans are originated in Mid Penn’s
primary market and surrounding areas.
The largest component of Mid Penn’s consumer loan portfolio consists of fixed rate home equity loans and variable rate
home equity lines of credit. Substantially all home equity loans and lines of credit are secured by second mortgages on
principal residences. The Bank will lend amounts, which, together with all prior leins, typically may be up to 85% of the
appraised value of the property securing the loan. Home equity term loans may have maximum terms up to 20 years while
home equity lines of credit generally have maximum terms of five years.
Consumer loan terms vary according to the type and value of collateral, length of contract and creditworthiness of the
borrower. The underwriting standards employed by the Bank for consumer loans include an application, a determination of
the applicant’s payment history on other debts and an assessment of ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the
proposed loan. Although creditworthiness of the applicant is a primary consideration, the underwriting process also includes
a comparison of the value of the collateral, if any, in relation to the proposed loan amount.
Consumer loans may entail greater credit risk than do residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of consumer loans
which are unsecured or are secured by rapidly depreciable assets, such as automobiles or recreational equipment. In such
cases, any repossessed collateral for a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment of the
outstanding loan balance. In addition, consumer loan collections are dependent on the borrower’s continuing financial
stability, and thus are more likely to be affected by adverse personal circumstances. Furthermore, the application of various
federal and state laws, including bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount that can be recovered on such loans.
The allowance for credit losses consists of the allowance for loan and lease losses and the reserve for unfunded lending
commitments. The allowance for loan and lease losses represents management’s estimate of losses inherent in the loan
portfolio as of the balance sheet date and is recorded as a reduction to loans. The reserve for unfunded lending commitments
represents management’s estimate of losses inherent in its unfunded loan commitments and is recorded in other liabilities on
the consolidated balance sheet. The allowance for loan and lease losses is increased by the provision for loan and lease
losses, and decreased by charge-offs, net of recoveries. Loans deemed to be uncollectible are charged against the allowance
for loan and lease losses, and subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance. All, or part, of the principal
balance of loans are charged off to the allowance as soon as it is determined that the repayment of all, or part, of the
48
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
principal balance is highly unlikely. Non-residential consumer loans are generally charged off no later than 120 days past
due on a contractual basis, earlier in the event of Bankruptcy, or if there is an amount deemed uncollectible. Because all
identified losses are immediately charged off, no portion of the allowance for loan and lease losses is restricted to any
individual loan or groups of loans, and the entire allowance is available to absorb any and all loan losses.
The allowance for credit losses is maintained at a level considered adequate to provide for losses that can be reasonably
anticipated. Management performs a monthly evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance. The allowance is based on Mid
Penn’s past loan loss experience, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrower’s
ability to repay, the estimated value of any underlying collateral, composition of the loan portfolio, current economic
conditions and other relevant factors. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires material estimates that may be
susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available.
The allowance consists of specific, general and unallocated components. The specific component relates to loans that are
classified as impaired. For loans that are classified as impaired, an allowance is established when the discounted cash flows,
collateral value, or observable market price of the impaired loan is lower than the carrying value of that loan. The general
component covers pools of loans by loan class including commercial loans not considered impaired, as well as smaller
balance homogeneous loans, such as residential real estate, home equity and other consumer loans. These pools of loans are
evaluated for loss exposure based upon historical loss rates for each of these categories of loans, adjusted for qualitative
factors. These qualitative risk factors include changes in economic conditions, fluctuations in loan quality measures,
changes in the experience of the lending staff and loan review systems, growth or changes in the mix of loans originated,
and shifting industry or portfolio concentrations.
Each factor is assigned a value to reflect improving, stable or declining conditions based on management’s best judgment
using relevant information available at the time of the evaluation. Adjustments to the factors are supported through
documentation of changes in conditions in a narrative accompanying the allowance for loan loss calculation.
Mid Penn considers a commercial loan (consisting of commercial and industrial, commercial real estate, commercial real
estate-construction, and lease financing loan classes) to be impaired when it becomes 90 days or more past due and not in
the process of collection. This methodology assumes the borrower cannot or will not continue to make additional payments.
At that time the loan would be considered collateral dependent as the discounted cash flow (“DCF”) method indicates no
operating income is available for evaluating the collateral position; therefore, all impaired loans are deemed to be collateral
dependent.
In addition, Mid Penn’s rating system assumes any loans classified as sub-standard non-accrual to be impaired, and all of
these loans are considered collateral dependent; therefore, all of Mid Penn’s impaired loans, whether reporting a specific
allocation or not, are considered collateral dependent.
Mid Penn evaluates loans for charge-off on a monthly basis. Policies that govern the recommendation for charge-off are
unique to the type of loan being considered. Commercial loans rated as nonaccrual or lower will first have a collateral
evaluation completed in accordance with the guidance on impaired loans. Once the collateral evaluation has been
completed, a specific allocation of allowance is made based upon the results of the evaluation. In the event the loan is
unsecured, the loan would have been charged-off at the recognition of impairment. If the loan is secured, it will undergo a
90 day waiting period to ensure the collateral shortfall identified in the evaluation is accurate and then charged down by the
specific allocation. Once the charge down is taken, the remaining balance remains a nonperforming loan with the original
terms and interest rate intact (not restructured). Commercial loans secured by real estate rated as impaired will also have an
initial collateral evaluation completed in accordance with the guidance on impaired loans. An updated real estate valuation
is ordered and the collateral evaluation is modified to reflect any variations in value. A specific allocation of allowance is
made for any anticipated collateral shortfall and a 90 day waiting period begins to ensure the accuracy of the collateral
shortfall. The loan is then charged down by the specific allocation. Once the charge down is taken, the remaining balance
remains a nonperforming loan with the original terms and interest rate intact (not restructured). The process of charge-off
for residential mortgage loans begins upon a loan becoming delinquent for 90 days and not in the process of collection. The
existing appraisal is reviewed and a lien search is obtained to determine lien position and any instances of intervening liens.
A new appraisal of the property will be ordered if deemed necessary by management and a collateral evaluation is
completed. The loan will then be charged down to the value indicated in the evaluation. Consumer loans (including home
equity loans and other consumer loans) are recommended for charge-off after reaching delinquency of 90 days and the loan
is not in the process of collection. The entire balance of the consumer loan is recommended for charge-off at this point.
As noted above, Mid Penn assesses a specific allocation for commercial loans prior to charging down or charging off the
loan. Once the charge down is taken, the remaining balance remains a nonperforming loan with the original terms and
interest rate intact (not restructured). In addition, Mid Penn takes a preemptive step when any commercial loan becomes
classified under its internal classification system. A preliminary collateral evaluation in accordance with the guidance on
impaired loans is prepared using the existing collateral information in the loan file. This process allows Mid Penn to review
49
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
both the credit and documentation files to determine the status of the information needed to make a collateral evaluation.
This collateral evaluation is preliminary but allows Mid Penn to determine if any potential collateral shortfalls exist.
It is Mid Penn’s policy to obtain updated third party valuations on all impaired loans collateralized by real estate within 30
days of the credit being classified as sub-standard non-accrual. Prior to receipt of the updated real estate valuation Mid Penn
will use any existing real estate valuation to determine any potential allowance issues; however no allowance
recommendation will be made until which time Mid Penn is in receipt of the updated valuation. The credit department
employs an electronic tracking system to monitor the receipt of and need for updated appraisals. To date, there have been
no significant time lapses noted with the above processes.
In some instances Mid Penn is not holding real estate as collateral and is relying on business assets (personal property) for
repayment. In these circumstances a collateral inspection is performed by Mid Penn personnel to determine an estimated
value. The value is based on net book value, as provided by the financial statements, and discounted accordingly based on
determinations made by management. Occasionally, Mid Penn will employ an outside service to provide a fair estimate of
value based on auction sales or private sales. Management reviews the estimates of these third parties and discounts them
accordingly based on management’s judgment, if deemed necessary.
For impaired loans with no valuation allowance required, Mid Penn’s practice of obtaining independent third party market
valuations on the subject property within 30 days of being placed on non-accrual status sometimes indicates that the loan to
value ratio is sufficient to obviate the need for a specific allocation in spite of significant deterioration in real estate values in
Mid Penn’s primary market area. These circumstances are determined on a case by case analysis of the impaired loans.
Mid Penn actively monitors the values of collateral on impaired loans. This monitoring may require the modification of
collateral values over time or changing circumstances by some factor, either positive or negative, from the original values.
All collateral values will be assessed by management at least every 18 months for possible revaluation by an independent
third party.
Mid Penn does not currently, or plan in the future to, use automated valuation methodologies as a method of valuing real
estate collateral.
An unallocated component is maintained to cover uncertainties that could affect management’s estimate of probable losses.
The unallocated component of the allowance reflects the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used
in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the portfolio.
Large groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Accordingly, Mid Penn does
not separately identify individual residential mortgage loans, home equity loans and other consumer loans for impairment
disclosures, unless such loans are the subject of a troubled debt restructuring agreement.
Loans whose terms are modified are classified as troubled debt restructurings if the borrowers have been granted
concessions and it is deemed that those borrowers are experiencing financial difficulty. Concessions granted under a
troubled debt restructuring generally involve a temporary reduction in interest rate or an extension of a loan’s stated maturity
date. Non-accrual troubled debt restructurings are restored to accrual status if principal and interest payments, under the
modified terms, are current for six consecutive months after modification. Loans classified as troubled debt restructurings
are designated as impaired.
The allowance calculation methodology includes further segregation of loan classes into risk rating categories. The
borrower’s overall financial condition, repayment sources, guarantors, and value of collateral, if appropriate, are evaluated
annually for commercial loans or when credit deficiencies arise, such as delinquent loan payments. Credit quality risk
ratings include regulatory classifications of special mention, substandard, doubtful, and loss. Loans criticized as special
mention have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If uncorrected, the potential weaknesses
may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects. Loans classified substandard have a well-defined weakness or
weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They include loans that are inadequately protected by the current
sound net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans classified doubtful have all the
weaknesses inherent in loans classified substandard with the added characteristic that collection or liquidation in full, on the
basis of current conditions and facts, is highly improbable. Loans classified as a loss are considered uncollectible and are
charged to the allowance for loan losses. Any loans not classified as noted above are rated pass.
In addition, Federal regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Bank’s
allowance for loan and lease losses and may require the Bank to recognize additions to the allowance based on their
judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination, which may not be currently available to
management. Based on management’s comprehensive analysis of the loan portfolio, management believes the current level
of the allowance for loan losses is adequate.
50
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(f)
Bank Premises and Equipment
Land is carried at cost. Buildings, furniture, fixtures, equipment, land improvements, and leasehold improvements are stated
at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives
of the assets. Building assets are depreciated using an estimated useful life of five to fifty years. Furniture, fixtures, and
equipment are depreciated using an estimated useful life of three to ten years. Land improvements are depreciated over an
estimated useful life of ten to twenty years. Leasehold improvements are depreciated using an estimated useful life that is
the lesser of the remaining life of the lease or ten to thirty years. Maintenance and normal repairs are charged to expense
when incurred, while major additions and improvements are capitalized. Gains and losses on disposals are reflected in
current operations.
(g)
Restricted Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
The Bank owns restricted stock investments in the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”). Federal law requires a member
institution of the FHLB to hold stock according to a predetermined formula. The stock is carried at cost. In December
2008, the FHLB of Pittsburgh notified member banks that it was suspending dividend payments and the repurchase of
capital stock and as of December 31, 2010 has not changed its position regarding dividend payments. During 2010 the
FHLB of Pittsburgh did perform a limited excess capital stock repurchase based upon positive third quarter net income.
Any future capital stock repurchases will be made on a quarterly basis if conditions warrant such repurchases.
Management evaluates the restricted stock for impairment on an annual basis. Management’s determination of whether
these investments are impaired is based on their assessment of the ultimate recoverability of their cost rather than by
recognizing temporary declines in value. The determination of whether a decline affects the ultimate recoverability of their
cost is influenced by criteria such as (1) the significance of the decline in net assets of the FHLB as compared to the capital
stock amount for the FHLB and the length of time this situation has persisted, (2) commitments by the FHLB to make
payments required by law or regulation and the level of such payments in relation to the operating performance of the
FHLB, and (3) the impact of legislative and regulatory changes on institutions and, accordingly, on the customer base of the
FHLB.
Management believes no impairment charge is necessary related to the FHLB restricted stock as of December 31, 2010.
(h)
Foreclosed Assets Held for Sale
Foreclosed assets held for sale consist primarily of real estate acquired through, or in lieu of, foreclosure in settlement of
debt and are recorded at fair value less cost to sell at the date of transfer, establishing a new cost basis. Any valuation
adjustments required at the date of transfer are charged to the allowance for loan losses. Subsequent to acquisition,
foreclosed assets are carried at fair value less costs of disposal, based upon periodic evaluations that consider changes in
market conditions and development and disposal costs. Operating results from assets acquired in satisfaction of debt,
including rental income less operating costs and gains or losses on the sale of, or the periodic evaluation of foreclosed assets,
are recorded in noninterest expense.
(i)
Mortgage Servicing Rights
Mortgage servicing rights are recognized as assets upon the sale of a mortgage loan. A portion of the cost of the loan is
allocated to the servicing right based upon relative fair value. The fair value of servicing rights is based on the present
value of estimated future cash flows of mortgages sold stratified by rate and maturity date. Assumptions that are
incorporated in the valuation of servicing rights include assumptions about prepayment speeds on mortgages and the cost to
service loans. Servicing rights are reported in other intangibles and are amortized over the estimated period of future
servicing income to be received on the underlying mortgage loans. The carrying amount of mortgage servicing rights was
$185,000 and $138,000 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Amortization expense is netted against loan
servicing fee income and is reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Operations in mortgage banking income. Servicing
rights are evaluated for impairment based upon estimated fair value as compared to unamortized book value.
(j)
Investment in Limited Partnership
Mid Penn invested as a limited partner in a partnership in September 2008 that provides low-income housing in Enola,
Pennsylvania. The carrying value of Mid Penn’s investment in the limited partnership was $583,000 at December 31, 2010
using the equity method. Mid Penn’s maximum exposure to loss is limited to the carrying value of its investment at year-
end. The partnership anticipates receiving $76,000 annually in low-income housing tax credits.
51
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(k)
Income Taxes
Certain items of income and expense are recognized in different accounting periods for financial reporting purposes than for
income tax purposes. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are provided in recognition of these temporary differences at
currently enacted income tax rates. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are
adjusted through the provision for income taxes. Mid Penn recognizes interest and/or penalties related to income tax matters
in income tax expense.
(l)
Core Deposit Intangible
Core deposit intangible is a measure of the value of consumer demand and savings deposits acquired in business
combinations accounted for as purchases. The core deposit intangible is being amortized over an 8-year life on a straight-
line basis. The core deposit intangible is subject to impairment testing whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate its carrying amount may not reflect benefit.
(m)
Goodwill
Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of assets acquired in connection with 2004 and 2006
business acquisitions accounted for as purchases. Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 350, Intangibles,
Goodwill and Other requires a two-step process for testing the impairment of goodwill on at least an annual basis. In 2010,
Mid Penn changed the valuation methodology for evaluating goodwill impairment from using an internally prepared
analysis based on Mid Penn’s stock price, to obtaining an independent valuation by a third party. This change in
methodology did not have any effect on the results of operations of Mid Penn. Mid Penn did not identify any impairment on
its outstanding goodwill from its most recent testing, which was performed as of December 31, 2010. In addition, Mid Penn
did not identify any impairment in 2009 or 2008.
(n)
Bank Owned Life Insurance
Mid Penn is the owner and beneficiary of bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”) policies on current and former directors. The
earnings from the BOLI policies are an asset that can be liquidated, if necessary, with associated tax costs. However, Mid
Penn intends to hold these policies and, accordingly, Mid Penn has not provided deferred income taxes on the earnings from
the increase in cash surrender value.
GAAP requires Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements to have a liability recognized related to the postretirement benefits
covered by an endorsement split-dollar life insurance arrangement, and a liability for the future death benefit. Mid Penn
recorded a cumulative effect adjustment to the balance of retained earnings of $277,000, as of January 1, 2008.
(o)
Marketing and Advertising Costs
Marketing and advertising costs are expensed as incurred and were $299,000 in 2010, $679,000 in 2009, and $525,000 in
2008.
(p)
Postretirement Benefit Plans
Mid Penn follows the guidance in ASC Topic 715, Compensation-Retirement Benefits related to postretirement benefit
plans. This guidance requires additional disclosures about defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement defined
benefit plans.
(q)
Other Benefit Plan
A funded contributory defined-contribution plan is maintained for substantially all employees. The cost of the Mid Penn
defined contribution plan is charged to current operating expenses and is funded annually.
(r)
Trust Assets and Income
Assets held by the Bank in a fiduciary or agency capacity for customers of the Trust Department are not included in the
consolidated financial statements since such items are not assets of the Bank. Trust income is recognized on the cash basis,
which is not materially different than if it were reported on the accrual basis.
52
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(s)
Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Earnings (Loss) per share are computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during each of the years presented. The following data show the amounts used in computing basic and diluted
earnings (loss) per share. As shown in the table that follows, diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed using weighted
average common shares outstanding, plus weighted average common shares available from the exercise of all dilutive stock
warrants issued to the U.S. Treasury under the provisions of the Capital Purchase Program, based on the average share price
of Mid Penn’s common stock during the period.
The computations of basic earnings (loss) per common share follow:
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Net Income (Loss)
Less: Dividends on preferred stock
Accretion of preferred stock discount
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders
2010
2009
2008
$
$
$
2,748
(500)
(14)
2,234
(2,295)
(500)
(14)
(2,809)
$
$
$
3,588
(16)
-
3,572
Weighted average common shares outstanding
Basic earnings (loss) per common share
3,479,780
0.64
$
3,479,780
(0.81)
$
3,483,097
1.03
$
The computations of diluted earnings (loss) per common share follow:
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding
Dilutive effect of potential common stock arising from stock warrants:
Exercise of outstanding stock warrants issued to U.S. Treasury
under the Capital Repurchase Program
Adjusted weighted-average common shares outstanding
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share
2010
2009
2008
$
2,234
3,479,780
$
(2,809)
3,479,780
$
3,572
3,483,097
-
-
3,479,780
0.64
$
3,479,780
(0.81)
$
56
3,483,153
1.03
$
As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, Mid Penn had 73,099 warrants that were anti-dilutive because the fair value of the
common stock was below the $20.52 exercise price of these warrants.
(4)
Comprehensive Income (Loss)
GAAP requires that recognized revenue, expenses, gains, and losses be included in net income (loss). Changes in certain assets and
liabilities such as unrealized gains on securities available for sale and the liability associated with defined benefit plans are reported as
a separate component of the shareholders’ equity section of the balance sheet. Such items, along with net income (loss), are
components of comprehensive income (loss). The components of other comprehensive income (loss), and the related tax effects, are
as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Change in unrealized holding (losses) gains on available for sale securities
Less reclassification adjustment for gains realized in income
Net unrealized (losses) gains
2010
$
Years Ended December 31,
2009
2008
(971)
-
(971)
400
$
-
400
$
191
(9)
182
Change in defined benefit plans
Other comprehensive (loss) income
Income tax benefit (expense)
Net of tax amount
(145)
(1,116)
379
(737)
$
161
561
(192)
369
$
-
182
(62)
120
$
53
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The components of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of taxes, are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Balance - December 31, 2008
Unrealized Gain
on Securities
$
554
Defined Benefit
Plan Liability
$
(150)
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income
$
404
Balance - December 31, 2009
$
817
$
(44)
$
773
Balance - December 31, 2010
$
176
$
(140)
$
36
(5)
Restrictions on Cash and Due from Bank Accounts
The Bank is required to maintain reserve balances with the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. The amounts of those required
reserve balances were $173,000 at December 31, 2010, and $163,000 at December 31, 2009.
(6)
Investment Securities
Securities to be held for indefinite periods, but not intended to be held to maturity, are classified as available for sale and carried at fair
value. Securities held for indefinite periods include securities that management intends to use as part of its asset and liability
management strategy and that may be sold in response to liquidity needs, changes in interest rates, resultant prepayment risk, and
other factors related to interest rate and resultant prepayment risk changes.
Realized gains and losses on dispositions are based on the net proceeds and the adjusted book value of the securities sold, using the
specific identification method. Unrealized gains and losses on investment securities available for sale are based on the difference
between book value and fair value of each security. These gains and losses are credited or charged to other comprehensive income,
whereas realized gains and losses flow through the Corporation’s results of operations.
ASC Topic 320, Investments – Debt and Equity Securities, clarifies the interaction of the factors that should be considered when
determining whether a debt security is other-than-temporarily impaired. For debt securities, management must assess whether (a) it
has the intent to sell the security and (b) it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security prior to its anticipated
recovery. These steps are done before assessing whether the entity will recover the cost basis of the investment. Previously, this
assessment required management to assert it has both the intent and the ability to hold a security for a period of time sufficient to
allow for an anticipated recovery in fair value to avoid recognizing other-than-temporary impairment. This change does not affect the
need to forecast recovery of the value of the security through either cash flows or market price.
In instances when a determination is made that other-than-temporary impairment exists but the investor does not intend to sell the debt
security and it is not more likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security prior to its anticipated recovery, this guidance
changes the presentation and amount of the other-than-temporary impairment recognized in the income statement. The other-than-
temporary impairment is separated into (a) the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to a decrease in cash flows
expected to be collected from the debt security (the credit loss) and (b) the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment
related to all other factors. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to the credit loss is recognized in
earnings. The amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment related to all other factors is recognized in other comprehensive
income.
54
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, amortized cost, fair value, and unrealized gains and losses on investment securities are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2010
Available for sale securities:
U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agencies
Mortgage-backed U.S. government agencies
State and political subdivision obligations
Equity securities
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2009
Available for sale securities:
U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agencies
Mortgage-backed U.S. government agencies
State and political subdivision obligations
Equity securities
Amortized
Cost
Unrealized
Gains
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
$
$
$
$
668
144
481
-
1,293
-
$
285
735
7
1,027
$
$
$
17,394
25,387
27,678
243
70,702
Amortized
Cost
Unrealized
Gains
Unrealized
Losses
Fair
Value
$
$
$
$
409
97
828
-
1,334
-
$
-
91
5
96
$
$
$
15,700
4,619
26,781
245
47,345
16,726
25,528
27,932
250
70,436
15,291
4,522
26,044
250
46,107
Estimated fair values of debt securities are based on quoted market prices, where applicable. If quoted market prices are not available,
fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments, adjusted for differences between the quoted instruments and
the instruments being valued.
Included in equity securities is an investment in Access Capital Strategies, an equity fund that invests in low to moderate income
financing projects. This investment was purchased in 2004 to help fulfill the Bank’s regulatory requirement of the Community
Reinvestment Act and at December 31, 2009, and December 31, 2010, is reported at fair value.
Investment securities having a fair value of $37,259,000 at December 31, 2010, and $37,434,000 at December 31, 2009, were pledged
to secure public deposits and other borrowings.
55
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The following table presents gross unrealized losses and fair value of investments aggregated by investment category and length of
time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at December 31, 2010 and 2009.
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2010
Available for sale securities:
Mortgage-backed U.S. government agencies
State and political subdivision obligations
Equity securities
Total temporarily impaired
available for sale securities
Less Than 12 Months
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
12 Months or More
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Total
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
$
13,032
11,318
-
$
285
668
-
-
$
808
243
-
$
67
7
$
13,032
12,126
243
$
285
735
7
$
24,350
$
953
$
1,051
$
74
$
25,401
$
1,027
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2009
Available for sale securities:
State and political subdivision obligations
Equity securities
Total temporarily impaired
available for sale securities
Less Than 12 Months
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
12 Months or More
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
Total
Fair
Value
Unrealized
Losses
$
4,321
-
91
$
-
-
$
245
$
-
5
$
4,321
245
$
91
5
$
4,321
$
91
$
245
$
5
$
4,566
$
96
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis; and more frequently when
economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to the length of time and the extent to which the fair
value has been less than cost, and the financial condition and near term prospects of the issuer. In addition, for debt securities, the
Corporation considers (a) whether management has the intent to sell the security, (b) it is more likely than not that management will
be required to sell the security prior to its anticipated recovery, and (c) whether management expects to recover the entire amortized
cost basis. For equity securities, management considers the intent and ability to hold securities until recovery of unrealized losses.
At December 31, 2010, Mid Penn had 30 debt securities with unrealized losses. These securities have depreciated 3.60% from their
amortized cost basis. At December 31, 2009, 8 debt securities with unrealized losses had depreciated 2.07% from the amortized cost
basis. These securities are issued by either the U.S. Government or other governmental agencies. These unrealized losses were
determined principally by reference to current interest rates for similar types of securities. In analyzing an issuer's financial condition,
management considers whether the U.S. Government or its agencies issued the securities, whether downgrades by bond rating
agencies have occurred, and the results of reviews of the issuer's financial condition. Based on the above conditions management has
determined that no declines are deemed to be other-than-temporary.
The table below is the maturity distribution of investment securities at amortized cost and fair value at December 31, 2010 and 2009:
(Dollars in thousands)
Due in 1 year or less
Due after 1 year but within 5 years
Due after 5 years but within 10 years
Due after 10 years
Mortgage-backed securities
Equity securities
December 31, 2010
December 31, 2009
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
Amortized
Cost
Fair
Value
$
$
$
$
7,791
6,319
15,245
15,303
44,658
25,528
250
70,436
7,825
6,558
16,014
14,675
45,072
25,387
243
70,702
1,022
11,878
17,662
10,773
41,335
4,522
250
46,107
1,026
12,121
18,417
10,917
42,481
4,619
245
47,345
$
$
$
$
Mortgage-backed securities at December 31, 2010, had an average life of 3.7 years compared to an average life of 2.6 years at
December 31, 2009. New investment purchases in this category have longer average lives than the portfolio at December 31, 2009.
56
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(7)
Loans and Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses
A summary of loans at December 31, 2010 and 2009 is as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial real estate, construction and land development
Commercial, industrial and agricultural
Real estate - residential
Consumer
2010
$
2009
$
252,915
70,295
136,035
8,490
467,735
253,878
85,795
128,522
12,190
480,385
$
$
Net unamortized loan fees and costs of $712,000 in 2010 and $504,000 in 2009 were deducted from loans.
The Bank has granted loans to certain of its executive officers, directors, and their related interests. These loans were made on
substantially the same basis, including interest rates and collateral as those prevailing for comparable transactions with other
borrowers at the same time. The aggregate amount of these loans was $8,068,000 and $6,244,000 at December 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively. During 2010, $14,532,000 of new loans and advances were extended and repayments totaled $12,708,000. None of
these loans were past due, in non-accrual status, or restructured at December 31, 2010.
The classes of the loan portfolio, summarized by the aggregate pass rating and the classified ratings of special mention, substandard,
and doubtful within Mid Penn’s internal risk rating system as of December 31, 2010 are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Pass
Special
Mention
Substandard
Doubtful
Total
Commercial and industrial
Commercial real estate
Commercial real estate - construction
Lease financing
Residential mortgage
Home equity
Consumer
$
$
$
$
63,195
262,743
34,495
2,177
43,960
19,708
8,058
434,336
1,830
6,421
2,768
-
-
308
432
11,759
2,803
16,537
1,565
277
106
352
-
21,640
-
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
$
-
$
$
$
$
67,828
285,701
38,828
2,454
44,066
20,368
8,490
467,735
57
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Impaired loans by loan portfolio class as of December 31, 2010 are summarized as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
With no related allowance recorded:
Commercial and industrial
Commercial real estate
Commercial real estate - construction
Lease financing
Residential mortgage
Home equity
Consumer
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial and industrial
Commercial real estate
Commercial real estate - construction
Lease financing
Residential mortgage
Home equity
Consumer
Total:
Commercial and industrial
Commercial real estate
Commercial real estate - construction
Lease financing
Residential mortgage
Home equity
Consumer
Recorded
Investment
Unpaid
Principal
Balance
$
766
7,414
1,565
169
96
113
-
$
1,730
10,642
1,957
211
99
516
-
Related
Allowance
-
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
Average
Recorded
Investment
Interest
Income
Recognized
$
1,222
9,317
1,858
181
97
283
-
$
79
303
73
11
4
9
-
$
896
4,218
-
-
$
1,518
5,839
-
-
10
22
-
10
113
-
$
685
1,166
-
-
10
22
-
$
938
4,384
-
-
10
25
-
$
13
242
-
-
-
2
-
$
1,662
11,632
1,565
169
106
135
-
$
3,248
16,481
1,957
211
109
629
-
$
685
1,166
-
-
10
22
-
$
2,160
13,701
1,858
181
107
308
-
$
92
545
73
11
4
11
-
Non-accrual loans by loan portfolio class as of December 31, 2010 are summarized as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
2010
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Commercial real estate - construction
Lease financing
Residential mortgage
Home equity
Consumer
$
1,839
11,878
1,565
219
1,376
320
31
17,228
$
58
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The performance and credit quality of the loan portfolio is also monitored by the analyzing the age of the loans receivable as
determined by the length of time a recorded payment is past due. The classes of the loan portfolio summarized bye the past due status
as of December 31, 2010 is summarized as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial
Commercial real estate
Commercial real estate -
construction
Lease financing
Residential mortgage
Home equity
Consumer
Total
30-59 Days
Past Due
$
112
1,670
60-89 Days
Past Due
$
186
469
Greater than
90 Days
$
1,652
4,954
Total Past
Due
$
1,950
7,093
Current
$
65,878
278,608
Total Loans
67,828
$
285,701
-
-
823
330
369
3,304
$
-
-
133
-
11
799
$
931
1
870
238
49
8,695
$
931
1
1,826
568
429
12,798
$
37,897
2,453
42,240
19,800
8,061
454,937
$
38,828
2,454
44,066
20,368
8,490
467,735
$
Loans
Receivable >
90 Days and
Accruing
-
$
-
-
1
-
-
18
19
$
Changes in the allowance for loan and lease losses for the years 2010, 2009 and 2008 are summarized as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Balance, January 1
Provision for loan and lease losses
Loans and leases charged off
Recoveries on loans and leases charged off
Balance, December 31
2010
2009
2008
$
$
$
7,686
2,635
(3,434)
174
7,061
5,505
9,520
(7,431)
92
7,686
$
$
$
4,790
1,230
(647)
132
5,505
The recorded investment in loans and leases that are considered impaired amounted to $15,269,000 on December 31, 2010, and
$13,726,000 on December 31, 2009. By definition, impairment of a loan or lease is considered when, based on current information
and events, it is probable that all amounts due will not be collected according to the contractual terms of the loan or lease agreement.
The allowance for loan and lease losses related to loans and leases classified as impaired amounted to $1,883,000 at December 31,
2010 and $2,561,000 at December 31, 2009. At December 31, 2010, impaired loans with a valuation allowance were $5,146,000 and
those without a valuation allowance were $10,123,000. At December 31, 2009, impaired loans with a valuation allowance were
$4,597,000 and those without a valuation allowance were $9,129,000. The average balances of total impaired loans and leases
amounted to $18,316,000, $13,293,000, and $5,376,000 for the years 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. The Bank applies payments
on impaired loans on a principal first basis. Interest income is recognized on impaired loans and leases on a cash basis. The cash
receipts recognized as interest income were $736,000, $982,000, and $51,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and
2008.
Loans and leases which were past due 90 days or more for which interest continued to be accrued amounted to $19,000 at December
31, 2010 and $661,000 at December 31, 2009. Total nonaccrual loans and leases amounted to $17,228,000 at December 31, 2010 and
$14,933,000 at December 31, 2009. $4,818,000 of the 2010 non-accrual loans are also troubled debt restructured loans compared with
$4,278,000 of the 2009 non-accrual loans. If these nonaccrual loans and leases had been current in accordance with their original
terms and had been outstanding throughout the period or since origination, if held for part of the period, Mid Penn would have
recorded interest income of $1,116,000, $608,000, and $335,000 in the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
Mid Penn has no commitments to lend additional funds to borrowers with impaired or nonaccrual loans.
59
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The allowance for loan and lease losses and recorded investment in financing receivables for the year ended December 31, 2010 are as
follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial
Commercial
real estate
Commercial
real estate -
construction
Lease
financing
Residential
mortgage
Home
equity
Consumer
Unallocated
Total
Allowance for loan
and lease losses:
Ending balance
$
2,447
$
3,616
$
159
$
1
$
219
$
363
$
61
$
195
$
7,061
Ending balance:
individually evaluated
for impairment
Ending balance:
collectively evaluted
for impairment
Loans receivables:
$
685
$
1,166
$
-
$
-
$
10
$
22
$
-
$
-
$
1,883
$
1,762
$
2,450
$
159
$
1
$
209
$
341
$
61
$
195
$
5,178
Ending balance
$
67,828
$
285,701
$
38,828
$
2,454
$
44,066
$
20,368
$
8,490
$
-
$
467,735
Ending balance:
individually evaluted
for impairment
Ending balance:
collectively evaluated
for impairment
$
1,662
$
11,632
$
1,565
$
169
$
106
$
135
$
-
$
-
$
15,269
$
66,166
$
274,069
$
37,263
$
2,285
$
43,960
$
20,233
$
8,490
$
-
$
452,466
(8)
Bank Premises and Equipment
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, bank premises and equipment are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Land
Buildings
Furniture, fixtures, and equipment
Land and Leasehold improvements
Construction in progress
Less accumulated depreciation
2010
2009
$
$
2,752
10,362
9,235
688
27
23,064
(9,879)
13,185
2,791
9,239
9,879
376
692
22,977
(10,073)
12,904
$
$
Depreciation expense was $1,302,000 in 2010, $1,115,000 in 2009, and $848,000 in 2008.
(9)
Deposits
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, time deposits amounted to $213,774,000 and $268,460,000, respectively. Interest expense on such
certificates of deposit amounted to $6,877,000, $9,293,000, and $9,903,000 for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008,
respectively.
60
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
These time deposits at December 31, 2010, mature as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Maturing in 2011
Maturing in 2012
Maturing in 2013
Maturing in 2014
Maturing in 2015
Maturing thereafter
Time Deposits
$100,000 or more
$
28,353
17,393
6,635
8,242
5,252
348
66,223
$
Less than $100,000
$
50,873
53,344
17,616
15,696
8,876
1,146
147,551
$
Brokered deposits included in the deposit totals equaled $16,494,000 at December 31, 2010 and $27,889,000 at December 31, 2009.
Deposits and other funds from related parties held by Mid Penn at December 31, 2010 and 2009 amounted to $8,841,000 and
$8,717,000, respectively.
(10)
Short-term Borrowings
Short-term borrowings as of December 31, 2010 and 2009 consisted of:
(Dollars in thousands)
Federal funds purchased
Repurchase agreements
Treasury, tax and loan notes
2010
-
$
578
983
1,561
$
2009
$
12,886
2,839
319
16,044
$
The weighted average interest rate on total short-term borrowings outstanding was 0.47% at December 31, 2010, and 0.57% at
December 31, 2009.
Federal funds purchased represent overnight funds. The Bank has a line of credit commitment from the Federal Home Loan Bank
(“FHLB”) for overnight borrowings up to $40,000,000 of which $0 was outstanding at December 31, 2010. This line is collateralized
by certain qualifying loans and investment securities of the Bank. Securities sold under repurchase agreements generally mature
between one day and one year. Treasury, tax and loan notes are open-ended interest bearing notes payable to the U.S. Treasury upon
call. All tax deposits accepted by the Bank are placed in the Treasury note account. The Bank also has unused lines of credit with a
correspondent bank amounting to $7,500,000 at December 31, 2010.
(11)
Long-term Debt
The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (“FHLB”) and through its membership, the Bank can access a
number of credit products, which are utilized to provide liquidity. The maximum borrowing capacity available to the Bank at the
FHLB at December 31, 2010 was $239,205,000. As of December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Bank had long-term debt in the amount of
$27,883,000 and $38,057,000, respectively, consisting of:
(Dollars in thousands)
At December 31,
Loans maturing in 2010 with rates ranging from 6.26% to 6.71%
Loans maturing in 2011 at a rate of 5.13%
Loans maturing in 2013 with rates ranging from 3.24% to 4.75%
Loans maturing in 2015 at a rate of 4.18%
Loans maturing in 2026 at a rate of 4.80%
Loans maturing in 2027 at a rate of 6.71%
2010
-
$
5,000
14,236
5,000
3,565
82
27,883
$
2009
$
10,000
5,000
14,258
5,000
3,715
84
38,057
$
The aggregate amounts due on long-term debt subsequent to December 31, 2010 are $5,182,000 (2011), $191,000 (2012),
$14,365,000 (2013), $184,000 (2014), $5,193,000 (2015), and $2,768,000 thereafter. All of Mid Penn’s long-term debt, $9,731,000
of the Bank’s investments and the Bank’s entire mortgage loan portfolio are pledged to secure FHLB borrowings.
61
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(12)
Fair Value Measurement
Mid Penn adopted ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures effective January 1, 2008 for financial assets and
financial liabilities and on January 1, 2009, for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities. This guidance defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements.
Fair value measurement and disclosure guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell the asset or transfer the
liability in an orderly transaction (that is, not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement
date under current market conditions. This guidance provides additional information on determining when the volume and level of
activity for the asset or liability has significantly decreased. The guidance also includes information on identifying circumstances
when a transaction may not be considered orderly.
Fair value measurement and disclosure guidance provides a list of factors that a reporting entity should evaluate to determine whether
there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability in relation to normal market activity
for the asset or liability. When the reporting entity concludes there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity
for the asset or liability, further analysis of the information from that market is needed and significant adjustments to the related prices
may be necessary to estimate fair value in accordance with the fair value measurement and disclosure guidance.
This guidance clarifies that when there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability,
some transactions may not be orderly. In those situations, the entity must evaluate the weight of the evidence to determine whether
the transaction is orderly. The guidance provides a list of circumstances that may indicate that a transaction is not orderly. A
transaction price that is not associated with an orderly transaction is given little, if any, weight when estimating fair value.
Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market
participants at the measurement date. Inputs to valuation techniques refer to the assumptions that market participants would use in
pricing the asset or liability. Inputs may be observable, meaning those that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in
pricing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from independent sources, or unobservable, meaning those that
reflect the reporting entity’s own belief about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based
upon the best information available in the circumstances. Fair value measurement and disclosure guidance establishes a fair value
hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the
lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:
Level 1 Inputs - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for
identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
Level 2 Inputs - Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or
indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability;
Level 3 Inputs - Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value
measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market activity).
A description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such
instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth below.
There were no transfers of assets between fair value Level 1 and Level 2 for the year ended December 31, 2010. The following table
illustrates the financial instruments measured at fair value on a recurring basis segregated by hierarchy fair value levels:
62
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Fair value measurements at December 31, 2010 using:
Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
(Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agencies
Mortgage-backed U.S. government agencies
State and political subdivision obligations
Equity securities
(Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
U.S. Treasury and U.S. government agencies
Mortgage-backed U.S. government agencies
State and political subdivision obligations
Equity securities
Total carrying value
at
December 31, 2010
17,394
$
25,387
27,678
243
70,702
$
Total carrying value
at
December 31, 2009
15,700
$
4,619
26,781
245
47,345
$
Quoted prices
in active
markets
(Level 1)
-
$
-
-
243
243
$
Quoted prices
in active
markets
(Level 1)
-
$
-
-
245
245
$
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
-
$
-
-
-
$
-
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
-
$
-
-
-
$
-
$
$
17,394
25,387
27,678
-
70,459
$
$
15,700
4,619
26,781
-
47,100
Fair value measurements at December 31, 2009 using:
Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
Certain financial assets and financial liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not
measured at fair value on an ongoing basis, but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there
is evidence of impairment).
The following table illustrates the financial instruments measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis segregated by hierarchy fair
value levels:
(Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
Impaired Loans
Foreclosed Assets Held for Sale
(Dollars in thousands)
Assets:
Impaired Loans
Foreclosed Assets Held for Sale
Total carrying value
at
December 31, 2010
$
3,263
596
Total carrying value
at
December 31, 2009
2,036
$
663
Fair value measurements at December 31, 2010 using:
Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
$
-
-
Quoted prices
in active
markets
(Level 1)
$
-
-
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
3,263
596
$
Fair value measurements at December 31, 2009 using:
Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
-
$
-
Quoted prices
in active
markets
(Level 1)
-
$
-
Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)
2,036
663
$
Certain non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis include reporting units measured at
fair value in the first step of a goodwill impairment test. Certain non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities measured at fair
63
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
value on a non-recurring basis include non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities measured at fair value in the second step of a
goodwill impairment test, as well as intangible assets and other non-financial long-lived assets measured at fair value for impairment
assessment. As stated above, this guidance was applicable to these fair value measurements beginning January 1, 2009 and were not
significant at December 31, 2010.
ASC Topic 825, Financial Instruments, requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of
publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements.
The following methodologies and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of Mid Penn’s financial instruments:
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents is considered to be a reasonable estimate of fair value.
Interest-bearing Balances with other Financial Institutions:
The estimate of fair value was determined by comparing the present value of quoted interest rates on like deposits with the weighted
average yield and weighted average maturity of the balances.
Securities Available for Sale:
The fair value of securities classified as available for sale is determined by obtaining quoted market prices on nationally recognized
securities exchanges (Level 1), or matrix pricing (level 2), which is a mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt
securities without relying exclusively on quoted market prices for the specific securities but rather relying on the securities’
relationship to other benchmark quoted prices.
Impaired Loans:
Mid Penn’s rating system assumes any loans classified as sub-standard non-accrual to be impaired, and all of these loans are
considered collateral dependent; therefore, all of Mid Penn’s impaired loans, whether reporting a specific allocation or not, are
considered collateral dependent.
It is Mid Penn’s policy to obtain updated third party valuations on all impaired loans collateralized by real estate within 30 days of the
credit being classified as sub-standard non-accrual. Prior to receipt of the updated real estate valuation Mid Penn will use any existing
real estate valuation to determine any potential allowance issues; however no allowance recommendation will be made until which
time Mid Penn is in receipt of the updated valuation.
In some instances Mid Penn is not holding real estate as collateral and is relying on business assets (personal property) for repayment.
In these circumstances a collateral inspection is performed by Mid Penn personnel to determine an estimated value. The value is
based on net book value, as provided by the financial statements, and discounted accordingly based on determinations made by
management. Occasionally, Mid Penn will employ an outside service to provide a fair estimate of value based on auction sales or
private sales. Management reviews the estimates of these third parties and discounts them accordingly based on management’s
judgment, if deemed necessary. Mid Penn considers the estimates used in its impairment analysis to be Level 3 inputs.
Mid Penn actively monitors the values of collateral on impaired loans. This monitoring may require the modification of collateral
values over time or changing circumstances by some factor, either positive or negative, from the original values. All collateral values
will be assessed by management at least every 18 months for possible revaluation by an independent third party.
Mid Penn does not currently, or plan to in the future, use automated valuation methodologies as a method of valuing real estate
collateral.
Loans:
For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and which entail no significant changes in credit risk, carrying values approximated fair
value. The fair value of other loans are estimated by calculating the present value of the cash flow difference between the current rate
and the market rate, for the average maturity, discounted quarterly at the market rate.
Foreclosed Assets Held for Sale:
Assets included in foreclosed assets held for sale are carried at fair value and accordingly is presented as measured on a non-recurring
basis. Values are estimated using Level 3 inputs, based on appraisals that consider the sales prices of property in the proximate
vicinity.
Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable:
The carrying amount of accrued interest receivable and payable approximates their fair values.
64
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Restricted Investment in Bank Stocks:
The carrying amount of required and restricted investment in correspondent bank stock approximates fair value, and considers the
limited marketability of such securities.
Deposits:
The fair value for demand deposits (e.g., interest and noninterest checking, savings, and money market deposit accounts) is by
definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e. their carrying amounts). Fair value for fixed-rate
certificates of deposit was estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation by combining all fixed-rate certificates into a pool with a
weighted average yield and a weighted average maturity for the pool and comparing the pool with interest rates currently being
offered on a similar maturity.
Short-term Borrowings:
Because of time to maturity, the estimated fair value of short-term borrowings approximates the book value.
Long-term Debt:
The estimated fair values of long-term debt were determined using discounted cash flow analysis, based on currently available
borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.
Commitments to Extend Credit and Letters of Credit:
The fair value of commitments to extend credit is estimated using the fees currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking
into account market interest rates, the remaining terms and present credit worthiness of the counterparties. The fair value of
guarantees and letters of credit is based on fees currently charged for similar agreements.
The following table summarizes the carrying value and fair value of financial instruments at December 31, 2010 and 2009.
(Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2010
December 31, 2009
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
Interest-bearing balances with other
financial institutions
Investment securities
Net loans and leases
Restricted investment in bank stocks
Accrued interest receivable
Financial liabilities:
Deposits
Short-term borrowings
Long-term debt
Accrued interest payable
Off-balance sheet financial instruments:
Commitments to extend credit
Financial standby letters of credit
Carrying
Value
Fair
Value
Carrying
Value
Fair
Value
$
12,901
$
12,901
$
8,960
$
8,960
55,041
70,702
460,674
3,828
2,632
55,041
70,702
481,248
3,828
2,632
38,604
47,345
472,699
4,029
2,781
38,604
47,345
487,476
4,029
2,781
$
554,982
1,561
27,883
1,111
$
560,843
1,561
28,318
1,111
$
500,015
16,044
38,057
1,750
$
506,616
16,044
39,578
1,750
-
$
-
-
$
-
-
$
-
-
$
-
(13) Postretirement Benefit Plans
Mid Penn has an unfunded noncontributory defined benefit plan for directors. The plan provides defined benefits based on years of
service.
Mid Penn also has other postretirement benefit plans covering full-time employees. These health care and life insurance plans are
noncontributory.
65
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The significant aspects of each plan are as follows:
(a)
Health Insurance
For full-time employees who retire after at least 20 years of service, Mid Penn will pay premiums for major medical
insurance (as provided to active employees) for a period ending on the earlier of the date the participant obtains other
employment where major medical coverage is available or the date of the participant's death; however, in all cases payment
of medical premiums by Mid Penn will not exceed five years. If the retiree becomes eligible for Medicare within the five-
year period beginning on his/her retirement date, the Bank may pay, at its discretion, premiums for 65 Special coverage or a
similar supplemental coverage. After the five-year period has expired, all Mid Penn paid benefits cease; however, the
retiree may continue coverage through the Bank at his/her own expense. This plan was amended in 2008 to encompass only
those employees that had achieved ten years of full-time continuous service to Mid Penn as of January 1, 2008. Employees
hired after that date and those that had not achieved the service requirements are not eligible for the plan.
(b)
Life Insurance
For full-time employees who retire after at least 20 years of service, Mid Penn will provide term life insurance. The amount
of coverage prior to age 65 will be three times the participant's annual salary at retirement or $50,000, whichever is less.
After age 65, the life insurance coverage amount will decrease by 10% per year, subject to a minimum amount of $2,000.
(c)
Directors’ Retirement Plan
Mid Penn has an unfunded defined benefit retirement plan for directors with benefits based on years of service. The
adoption of this plan generated unrecognized prior service cost of $274,000, which is being amortized over the expected
future years of service of active directors. The unamortized balance at December 31, 2010, was $172,000.
Health and Life
The following tables provide a reconciliation of the changes in the plan’s health and life insurance benefit obligations and
fair value of plan assets for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, and a statement of the funded status at December
31, 2010 and 2009:
(Dollars in thousands)
Change in benefit obligations:
Benefit obligations, January 1
Service cost
Interest cost
Actuarial loss (gain)
Change in assumptions
Benefit payments
Benefit obligations, December 31
Change in fair value of plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets, January 1
Employer contributions
Benefit payments
Fair value of plan assets, December 31
December 31,
2010
2009
$
$
633
22
44
150
48
(29)
868
607
16
32
(35)
34
(21)
633
$
$
-
$
29
(29)
$
-
$
-
21
(21)
$
-
Funded status at year end
$
(868)
$
(633)
66
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
The amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2010 and 2009, is as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Accrued benefit liability
2010
$
868
2009
$
633
The amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income consist of:
(Dollars in thousands)
Net loss (gain), pretax
Prior service cost, pretax
December 31,
2010
$
72
(4)
2009
$
(126)
(5)
The accumulated benefit obligation for health and life insurance plans was $868,000 and $633,000 at December 31, 2010
and 2009, respectively.
The estimated prior service costs that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into net
periodic benefit cost during 2011 is ($1,053).
The components of net periodic postretirement benefit cost for 2010, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Service cost
Interest cost
Amortization of transition obligation
Amortization of prior service cost
Amortization of net gain
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost
2010
$
22
44
-
(1)
-
$
65
2009
$
16
32
-
(1)
(10)
37
$
2008
$
$
26
34
4
(1)
(7)
56
Assumptions used in the measurement of Mid Penn’s benefit obligations at December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
Weighted-average assumptions:
Discount rate
Rate of compensation increase
2010
2009
5.50%
4.50%
5.75%
4.75%
Assumptions used in the measurement of Mid Penn’s net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009
and 2008 are as follows:
2010
2009
2008
Weighted-average assumptions:
Discount rate
Rate of compensation increase
Assumed health care cost trend rates at December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
5.50%
4.50%
5.75%
4.75%
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year
Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the
ultimate trend rate)
Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate
2010
2009
7.50%
5.50%
2016
8.00%
5.50%
2014
5.75%
4.75%
2008
8.50%
5.50%
2014
67
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the health care plans. A one-
percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:
Effect on total of service and interest cost
Effect on accumulated postretirement benefit obligation
Increase
6
$
74
Decrease
$
(5)
(65)
Mid Penn expects to contribute $39,000 to its life and health benefit plans in 2011. The following table shows the estimated
benefit payments for future periods:
(Dollars in thousands)
1/1/2011 to 12/31/2011
1/1/2012 to 12/31/2012
1/1/2013 to 12/31/2013
1/1/2014 to 12/31/2014
1/1/2015 to 12/31/2015
1/1/2016 to 12/31/2020
$
39
28
41
56
72
442
Benefit obligations were measured as of December 31, 2010, for the postretirement benefit plan.
Retirement Plan
The following tables provide a reconciliation of the changes in the directors’ defined benefit plan’s benefit obligations and
fair value of plan assets for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 and a statement of the status at December 31,
2010 and 2009. This plan is unfunded.
(Dollars in thousands)
Change in benefit obligations:
Benefit obligations, January 1
Service cost
Interest cost
Actuarial gain
Change in assumptions
Benefit payments
Benefit obligations, December 31
Change in fair value of plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets, January 1
Employer contributions
Benefit payments
Fair value of plan assets, December 31
December 31,
2010
2009
$
$
975
23
54
(9)
12
(57)
998
1,056
20
56
(33)
-
(124)
975
$
$
$
-
57
(57)
$
-
$
-
124
(124)
$
-
Funded status at year end
$
(998)
$
(975)
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Accrued benefit liability
2010
$
998
2009
$
975
68
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income consist of:
(Dollars in thousands)
Net prior service cost, pretax
Net gain, pretax
December 31,
2010
$
172
(28)
2009
$
194
(31)
The accumulated benefit obligation for the retirement plan was $998,000 at December 31, 2010 and $975,000 at December
31, 2009.
The estimated net actuarial gain and prior service costs that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss) into net periodic benefit cost during 2011 are $9,000 and $21,525.
The components of net periodic retirement cost for 2010, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Service cost
Interest cost
Amortization of prior-service cost
Net periodic retirement cost
2010
2009
2008
$
$
$
23
53
22
98
20
56
22
98
24
60
21
105
$
$
$
Assumptions used in the measurement of Mid Penn’s benefit obligations at December 31, 2010 and 2009 are as follows:
Weighted-average assumptions:
Discount rate
Change in consumer price index
2010
2009
5.50%
3.00%
5.75%
3.25%
Assumptions used in the measurement of Mid Penn’s net periodic benefit cost for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009
and 2008 are as follows:
Weighted-average assumptions:
Discount rate
Change in consumer price index
2010
2009
2008
5.50%
3.00%
5.75%
3.25%
6.00%
3.50%
Mid Penn expects to contribute $68,000 to its retirement plan in 2011. The following table shows the estimated benefit
payments for future periods:
(Dollars in thousands)
1/1/2011 to 12/31/2011
1/1/2012 to 12/31/2012
1/1/2013 to 12/31/2013
1/1/2014 to 12/31/2014
1/1/2015 to 12/31/2015
1/1/2016 to 12/31/2020
$
68
82
85
87
90
493
Plan benefit obligations were measured as of December 31, 2010 for the directors’ defined benefit plan.
The Bank is the owner and beneficiary of insurance policies on the lives of certain officers and directors, which informally
fund the retirement plan obligation. The aggregate cash surrender value of these policies was $3,297,000 and $3,178,000 at
December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
69
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(14)
Other Benefit Plans
(a)
Defined-Contribution Plan
The Bank has a funded contributory defined-contribution plan covering substantially all employees. The Bank’s
contribution to the plan was $0 for 2010 and 2009, and $186,000 for 2008.
(b)
Deferred Compensation Plans
The Bank has an executive deferred compensation plan, which allows an executive officer to defer bonus compensation for
a specified period in order to provide future retirement income. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Bank had accrued a
liability of approximately $174,000 and $166,000, respectively, for this plan.
The Bank also has a directors’ deferred compensation plan, which allows directors to defer receipt of fees for a specified
period in order to provide future retirement income. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Bank had accrued a liability of
approximately $423,000 and $377,000, respectively, for this plan.
(c)
Salary Continuation Agreement
The Bank maintains a Salary Continuation Agreement (“Agreement”) for a former executive officer. The Agreement
provides the former executive officer with a fixed annual benefit. The benefit is payable beginning at age 65 for a period of
15 years. At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Bank has accrued a liability of approximately $167,000 and $156,000,
respectively, for the Agreement. The expense (income) related to the Agreement was $11,000 for 2010, $11,000 for 2009,
and ($116,000) for 2008. The income figure reflected for 2008 was the result of the resignation of the former executive
officer and the resulting change in the vesting period related to the agreement.
The Bank is the owner and beneficiary of an insurance policy on the life of the participating former executive officer, which
informally funds the benefit obligation. The aggregate cash surrender value of this policy was approximately $1,072,000
and $1,036,000 at December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
(d)
Employee Stock Ownership Plan
Mid Penn has an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) covering substantially all employees. Contributions to the
ESOP are made at the discretion of the Board of Directors. Total expense related to Mid Penn’s contribution to the ESOP
for 2010, 2009 and 2008 was $0, $0, and $91,000, respectively. The ESOP held 42,271 and 46,271 common shares of Mid
Penn stock as of December 31, 2010, and December 31, 2009, respectively, all of which were allocated to plan participants.
The ESOP shares are valued using Level 1 inputs as there is an active market for identical assets at the measurement date.
At December 31, 2010, the fair value of Mid Penn stock on the NASDAQ Stock Market was $7.50 per common share,
resulting in a total fair value of the ESOP of $317,000. Shares held by the ESOP are considered outstanding for purposes of
calculating earnings per share. Dividends paid on shares held by the ESOP are charged to retained earnings.
(e)
Split Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements
At December 31, 2010 and 2009, the Bank had Split Dollar Life Insurance arrangements with two former executives for
which the aggregate collateral assignment and cash surrender values are approximately $1,625,000 and $1,588,000,
respectively.
(f)
401(k) Plan
The Bank has a 401(k) plan that covers substantially all full-time employees. The plan allows employees to contribute a
portion of their salaries and wages to the plan. The plan provides for the Bank to match a portion of employee-elected
salary deferrals, subject to certain percentage maximums of their salaries and wages. The Bank’s contribution to the plan
was $90,000, $96,000, and $87,000 for the years ending December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively.
(g)
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Mid Penn has an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) in which all employees are eligible to participate. The plan
allows employees to use a portion of their salaries and wages to purchase common shares of Mid Penn stock at the market
value of shares at the end of each calendar quarter.
70
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(15)
Federal Income Taxes
The following temporary differences gave rise to the net deferred tax asset at December 31, 2010 and 2009:
(Dollars in thousands)
Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for loan and lease losses
Loan fees
Benefit plans
Nonaccrual interest
Legal fees
Disallowed charitable contributions
Core deposit intangible
Severance
Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation
Core deposit intangible
Bond accretion
Prepaid expenses
Goodwill and intangibles
Unrealized gain on securities
Deferred tax asset, net
2010
2009
$
2,328
171
1,072
379
12
-
5
-
3,967
(579)
-
(115)
(135)
(172)
(91)
(1,092)
2,875
$
$
2,500
48
864
207
12
26
-
68
3,725
(651)
(7)
(96)
(160)
(133)
(421)
(1,468)
2,257
$
The provision for (benefit from) income taxes consists of the following:
(Dollars in thousands)
Current
Deferred
Total provision for (benefit from) income taxes
2010
$
2009
2008
$
$
704
(288)
416
(1,965)
(243)
(2,208)
$
$
$
1,264
(160)
1,104
A reconciliation of income tax at the statutory rate to Mid Penn's effective rate is as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Provision (benefit) at the expected statutory rate
Effect of tax-exempt income
Effect of investment in life insurance
Nondeductible interest
Other items
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes
2010
2009
2008
$
$
$
1,076
(635)
(92)
51
16
416
(1,531)
(609)
(149)
62
19
(2,208)
1,596
(571)
(91)
68
102
1,104
$
$
$
Mid Penn has no unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would favorably affect the effective income tax rate in future periods.
Mid Penn does not expect the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits to significantly increase or decrease in the next twelve
months.
No amounts for interest and penalties were recorded in income tax (benefit) expense in the consolidated statement of operations for
the years ended December 31, 2010 or 2009. There were no amounts accrued for interest and penalties at December 31, 2010 or 2009.
Mid Penn and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax and income tax for the state of Pennsylvania. Mid Penn is no
longer subject to examination by taxing authorities for years before 2007. Tax years 2007 through the present remain open to
examination.
71
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(16)
Core Deposit Intangible
A summary of core deposit intangible is as follows at December 31, 2010.
(Dollars in thousands)
Gross carrying amount
Less accumulated amortization
Net carrying amount
2004
Acquisition
291
$
(239)
52
$
2006
Acquisition
232
$
(118)
114
$
Total
$
$
523
(357)
166
The core deposit intangibles for the acquisitions are being amortized over the weighted average useful life of 8 years, with no
estimated residual value.
Amortization expense amounted to $65,000 in 2010, $65,000 in 2009, and $66,000 in 2008.
The estimated amortization expenses of intangible assets for each of the four succeeding fiscal years are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
2011
2012
2013
2014
(17)
Regulatory Matters
$
$
65
45
29
27
166
Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc., is a financial holding company and, as such, chooses to maintain a well-capitalized status in its bank
subsidiary. Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require Mid Penn to maintain minimum
amounts and ratios (set forth below) of Tier 1 capital to average assets and of total capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-
weighted assets. As of December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, Mid Penn met all capital adequacy requirements to which the
Bank is subject, and the Bank is considered “well-capitalized”. However, future changes in regulations could increase capital
requirements and may have an adverse effect on capital resources.
The FDIC Board has adopted a restoration plan that raised assessment rates for deposit insurance premiums for 2009, and enacted a
special emergency assessment that has significantly affected operating results for the Corporation. The assessment was 0.05% of total
Bank Assets, less Tier 1 Capital as of June 30, 2009, and was paid on September 30, 2009. The special assessment for Mid Penn’s
banking subsidiary was $265,000.
The FDIC has also adopted a prepayment of projected deposit insurance premiums for a three-year period that would be paid on
December 30, 2009. The prepayment was approximately $2,719,000 for the Corporation. The prepayment will be carried as a prepaid
expense in other assets on the balance sheet and amortized into expense in the operating period to which it applies.
Certain restrictions exist regarding the ability of the Bank to transfer funds to the Corporation in the form of cash dividends, loans or
advances. At December 31, 2010, $0 of undistributed earnings of the Bank included in the consolidated shareholders’ equity was
available for distribution to the Corporation as dividends without prior regulatory approval, subject to regulatory capital requirements
below. On January 26, 2011, Mid Penn declared a cash dividend of $0.05 per common share, payable on February 28, 2011 to
shareholders of record as of February 9, 2011. This declaration and subsequent payout was made in compliance with Federal Reserve
Board policy regarding dividends.
72
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Mid Penn maintained the following regulatory capital levels, leverage ratios, and risk-based capital ratios as of December 31, 2010,
and December 31, 2009, as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
Capital Adequacy
Actual:
Minimum Capital
Required:
Amount
Ratio
Amount
Ratio
To Be Well-Capitalized
Under Prompt
Corrective
Action Provisions:
Amount
Ratio
$
46,957
46,957
52,711
7.4%
10.2%
11.4%
$
25,352
18,501
37,002
4.0%
4.0%
8.0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
$
46,799
46,799
52,553
7.4%
10.2%
11.5%
$
25,388
18,357
36,714
4.0%
4.0%
8.0%
$
31,735
27,536
45,893
5.0%
6.0%
10.0%
$
44,665
44,665
50,727
7.4%
9.2%
10.5%
$
24,033
19,329
38,658
4.0%
4.0%
8.0%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
$
44,434
44,434
50,496
7.4%
9.2%
10.4%
$
23,913
19,329
38,658
4.0%
4.0%
8.0%
$
29,892
28,993
48,322
5.0%
6.0%
10.0%
Corporation
As of December 31, 2010:
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
Bank
As of December 31, 2010:
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
Corporation
As of December 31, 2009:
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
Bank
As of December 31, 2009:
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets)
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
(18)
Concentration of Risk and Off-Balance Sheet Risk
The Bank is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of
its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and financial standby letters of credit. Those
instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated
balance sheets.
The Bank evaluates each customer's creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary
by the Bank upon extension of credit, is based on management's credit evaluation of the borrower. Collateral held varies but may
include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant, and equipment, and income-producing commercial properties. The Bank's
exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit
and financial standby letters of credit written is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same
credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for direct, funded loans.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the
contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since
many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily
represent future cash requirements.
Financial standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a
third party. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to
customers. The term of these financial standby letters of credit is generally one year or less.
73
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
As of December 31, 2010, commitments to extend credit amounted to $86,141,000 and financial standby letters of credit amounted to
$10,048,000.
Significant concentration of credit risk may occur when obligations of parties engaged in similar activities occur and accumulate in
significant amounts.
In analyzing the Bank's exposure to significant concentration of credit risk, management set a parameter of 10% or more of the Bank's
total net loans outstanding as the threshold in determining whether the obligations of the same or affiliated parties would be classified
as significant concentration of credit risk. Concentrations by industry, product line, type of collateral, etc., are also considered. U.S.
Treasury securities, obligations of U.S. government agencies and corporations, and any assets collateralized by the same were
excluded.
As of December 31, 2010, commercial real estate financing was the only similar activity that met the requirements to be classified as a
significant concentration of credit risk. However, there is a geographical concentration in that most of the Bank's business activity is
with customers located in Central Pennsylvania, specifically within the Bank's trading area made up of Dauphin County, lower
Northumberland County, western Schuylkill County and eastern Cumberland County.
The Bank's highest concentrations of credit within the loan portfolio are in the areas of Commercial Real Estate financing (61.1%) as
of December 31, 2010.
(19)
Commitments and Contingencies
Operating Leases:
In April 2005, Mid Penn entered into a non-cancelable operating lease agreement to lease approximately 2,500 square feet of office
space in the downtown Harrisburg area, with the initial term extending through April 2010. Mid Penn has the option to renew this
lease for two additional five-year periods and has exercised the first of these options, extending the term of the lease through April of
2015. Mid Penn also has entered into a non-cancelable lease on a drive-up ATM site in Halifax, PA. This lease runs through October
of 2012.
Minimum future rental payments under these operating leases as of December 31, 2010 are as follows:
(Dollars in thousands)
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
$
66
66
61
63
21
277
$
Mid Penn paid rent payments in 2010, 2009, and 2008 of $90,000, $97,000, and $92,000, respectively.
Litigation:
Mid Penn is subject to lawsuits and claims arising out of its business. In the opinion of management, after consultation with legal
counsel, the ultimate disposition of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial
condition of Mid Penn.
(20)
Common Stock
Mid Penn has reserved 50,000 of authorized, but unissued shares of its common stock for issuance under a Stock Bonus Plan (the
“Plan”). Shares issued under the Plan are at the discretion of the board of directors.
Under Mid Penn’s amended and restated dividend reinvestment plan, (DRIP), 200,000 of Mid Penn’s authorized but unissued
common stock are reserved for issuance. The DRIP also allows for voluntary cash payments within specified limits, for the purchase
of additional shares.
74
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
In September of 2005, Mid Penn’s Board of Directors approved a Stock Repurchase Program under which the Corporation could buy
back up to 250,000 shares of Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. Common Stock. Through December 31, 2008, 53,560 shares had been
repurchased at an average price of $24.75 per share. Mid Penn retired all treasury stock in December of 2008 and the Stock
Repurchase Program was terminated on December 10, 2008.
(21)
Preferred Stock
On December 19, 2008, Mid Penn entered into and closed a Letter Agreement with the United States Department of the Treasury (the
“Treasury”) pursuant to which the Treasury invested $10,000,000 in the Corporation under the Treasury’s Capital Purchase Program
(the “CPP”).
Under the CPP, the Treasury received (1) 10,000 shares of Series A Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, $1,000
liquidation preference, and (2) Warrants to purchase up to 73,099 shares of the Corporation’s common stock at an exercise price of
$20.52 per share. The $10,000,000 in new capital is treated as Tier 1 Capital.
The Series A Preferred Stock pays cumulative dividends at a rate of 5% per annum for the first five years and 9% per annum
thereafter. Pursuant to the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, the Secretary of the Treasury shall permit, subject to
consultation with the appropriate Federal banking agency, the Corporation to redeem the Series A Preferred Stock. The Corporation
may do so without regard to the source of the funds to be used to redeem the Series A Preferred Stock or any minimum waiting period.
If the Corporation elects to redeem the Series A Preferred Stock prior to February 15, 2012, and receives approval from the Treasury
and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, it must redeem at least $2,500,000 of the Series A Preferred Stock. Upon
redemption of the Series A Preferred Stock, the Secretary of the Treasury shall liquidate the warrants associated with the
Corporation’s participation in the CPP at the current market price. Upon the appropriate approval, the Corporation may redeem the
Series A Preferred Stock at the original purchase price plus accrued but unpaid dividends, if any. The related Warrants expire in ten
years and are immediately exercisable upon their issuance.
To participate in the program, the Corporation is required to meet certain standards, including; (1) ensuring that incentive
compensation for senior executives does not encourage unnecessary and excessive risk that threaten the value of the Corporation; (2)
requiring a clawback of any bonus or incentive compensation paid to a senior executive based on statements of earnings, gains or
other criteria that are later proven to be materially inaccurate; (3) prohibiting the Corporation from making any golden parachute
payment to a senior executive based on applicable Internal Revenue Code provisions; and (4) agreeing not to deduct for tax purposes
executive compensation in excess of $500,000 for each senior executive.
Based on the Program term sheet provided by the Treasury, the following are the effects on holders of common stock from the
issuance of Senior Preferred stock to the Treasury under the Program:
Restrictions on Dividends
For as long as any Senior Preferred shares are outstanding, no dividends can be declared or paid on common shares, nor can Mid Penn
repurchase or redeem any common shares, unless all accrued and unpaid dividends for all past dividend periods on the Senior
Preferred shares have been fully paid. In addition, the consent of the Treasury is required for any increase in the per share dividends
on common shares until the third anniversary of the date of the Senior Preferred investment unless prior to such third anniversary, the
Senior Preferred shares have been redeemed in whole or the Treasury has transferred all of the Senior Preferred shares to third parties.
Repurchases
The Treasury’s consent would be required for any share repurchases (other than (1) repurchases of the Senior Preferred shares and (2)
repurchases of common shares in connection with any benefit plan in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice)
until the third anniversary of the date of this investment unless prior to such third anniversary the Senior Preferred shares had been
redeemed in whole or the Treasury had transferred all of the Senior Preferred shares to third parties. In addition, there could be no
share repurchases of common shares if prohibited as described under “Restrictions on Dividends” above.
Voting Rights
The Senior Preferred shares would be non-voting, other than class voting rights on (1) any authorization or issuance of shares ranking
senior to the Senior Preferred shares, (2) any amendment to the rights of senior Preferred, or (3) any merger, exchange or similar
transaction which would adversely affect the rights of the Senior Preferred. If dividends on the Senior Preferred shares were not paid
in full for six dividend periods, whether or not consecutive, the Senior Preferred shareholder(s) would have the right to elect two
directors. The right to elect directors would end when full dividends had been paid for four consecutive dividend periods.
75
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(22)
Parent Company Statements
CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands)
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents
Investment in subsidiaries
Prepaid expense
Other assets
Total assets
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Shareholders' equity
Total shareholders' equity
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands)
Dividends from subsidiaries
Undistributed earnings (loss) of subsidiaries
Other expenses
Income tax benefit
Net income (loss)
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income (loss)
Undistributed (earnings) loss of subsidiaries
Decrease in other liabilities
Net cash provided by operating activities
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the maturity of investment securities
Purchase of investment securities
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Issued senior preferred stock
Investement in subsidiaries
Dividends paid
Purchase of treasury stock
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivelents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
76
December 31,
2010
2009
$
115
48,043
1
42
48,201
$
$
173
46,475
-
56
46,704
$
$
$
48,201
48,201
$
$
46,704
46,704
2010
$
For Years Ended December 31,
2009
2008
$
$
575
2,301
(193)
65
2,748
2,498
(4,673)
(182)
62
(2,295)
3,077
628
(201)
84
3,588
$
$
$
For Years Ended December 31,
2009
2008
2010
$
2,748
(2,301)
-
447
$
(2,295)
4,673
-
2,378
$
3,588
(628)
(16)
2,944
-
-
-
-
(5)
(500)
-
(505)
(58)
173
115
$
9,000
-
9,000
-
(9,000)
(9,000)
-
(9,000)
(2,262)
-
(11,262)
116
57
173
$
10,000
(1,000)
(2,787)
(252)
5,961
(95)
152
57
$
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(23)
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
ASU 2009-16: In October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)
2009-16, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860) - Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets. This Update amends the Codification
for the issuance of FASB Statement No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets-an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140.
The amendments in this Update improve financial reporting by eliminating the exceptions for qualifying special-purpose entities from
the consolidation guidance and the exception that permitted sale accounting for certain mortgage securitizations when a transferor has
not surrendered control over the transferred financial assets. In addition, the amendments require enhanced disclosures about the risks
that a transferor continues to be exposed to because of its continuing involvement in transferred financial assets. Comparability and
consistency in accounting for transferred financial assets will also be improved through clarifications of the requirements for isolation
and limitations on portions of financial assets that are eligible for sale accounting.
This guidance became effective January 1, 2010, and did not have a significant impact on Mid Penn’s financial condition or results of
operations.
ASU 2010-06: The FASB has issued ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures
about Fair Value Measurements. This ASU requires some new disclosures and clarifies some existing disclosure requirements about
fair value measurement as set forth in Codification Subtopic 820-10. The FASB’s objective is to improve these disclosures and, thus,
increase the transparency in financial reporting. Specifically, ASU 2010-06 amends Codification Subtopic 820-10 to now require:
•
•
A reporting entity to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value
measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers; and
In the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs, a reporting entity should present
separately information about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements.
In addition, ASU 2010-06 clarifies the requirements of the following existing disclosures:
•
•
For purposes of reporting fair value measurement for each class of assets and liabilities, a reporting entity needs to use judgment
in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities; and
A reporting entity should provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both
recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements.
ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2010, except for the disclosures about
purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Mid Penn adopted the
required provisions of ASU 2010-06, with no significant impact on its financial condition or results of operations.
ASU 2010-09: The FASB has issued ASU 2010-09, Subsequent Events (Topic 855): Amendments to Certain Recognition and
Disclosure Requirements. The amendments in the ASU remove the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose a date through which
subsequent events have been evaluated in both issued and revised financial statements. Revised financial statements include financial
statements revised as a result of either correction of an error or retrospective application of U.S. GAAP. The FASB also clarified that
if the financial statements have been revised, then an entity that is not an SEC filer should disclose both the date that the financial
statements were issued or available to be issued and the date the revised financial statements were issued or available to be issued. The
FASB believes these amendments remove potential conflicts with the SEC’s literature.
In addition, the amendments in the ASU require an entity that is a conduit bond obligor for conduit debt securities that are traded in a
public market to evaluate subsequent events through the date of issuance of its financial statements and must disclose such date.
All of the amendments in the ASU were effective upon issuance (February 24, 2010) except for the use of the issued date for conduit
debt obligors. That amendment was effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2010. Mid Penn adopted the required
provisions of ASU 2010-09, with no significant impact on its financial condition or results of operations.
ASU 2010-18: Receivables (Topic 310): Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan Is Part of a Pool That Is Accounted for as a
Single Asset, codifies the consensus reached in EITF Issue No. 09-I, “Effect of a Loan Modification When the Loan Is Part of a Pool
That Is Accounted for as a Single Asset.” The amendments to the Codification provide that modifications of loans that are accounted
for within a pool under Subtopic 310-30 do not result in the removal of those loans from the pool even if the modification of those
loans would otherwise be considered a troubled debt restructuring. An entity will continue to be required to consider whether the pool
of assets in which the loan is included is impaired if expected cash flows for the pool change. ASU 2010-18 does not affect the
77
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
accounting for loans under the scope of Subtopic 310-30 that are not accounted for within pools. Loans accounted for individually
under Subtopic 310-30 continue to be subject to the troubled debt restructuring accounting provisions within Subtopic 310-40.
ASU 2010-18 is effective prospectively for modifications of loans accounted for within pools under Subtopic 310-30 occurring in the
first interim or annual period ending on or after July 15, 2010. Early application is permitted. Upon initial adoption of ASU 2010-18,
an entity may make a one-time election to terminate accounting for loans as a pool under Subtopic 310-30. This election may be
applied on a pool-by-pool basis and does not preclude an entity from applying pool accounting to subsequent acquisitions of loans
with credit deterioration. The Corporation does not expect the adoption of this standard will have a significant impact on the
Corporation’s financial condition or results of operations.
ASU 2010-20: Receivables (Topic 310): Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit
Losses, will help investors assess the credit risk of a company’s receivables portfolio and the adequacy of its allowance for credit
losses held against the portfolios by expanding credit risk disclosures.
This ASU requires more information about the credit quality of financing receivables in the disclosures to financial statements, such as
aging information and credit quality indicators. Both new and existing disclosures must be disaggregated by portfolio segment or
class. The disaggregation of information is based on how a company develops its allowance for credit losses and how it manages its
credit exposure.
The amendments in this Update apply to all public and nonpublic entities with financing receivables. Financing receivables include
loans and trade accounts receivable. However, short-term trade accounts receivable, receivables measured at fair value or lower of
cost or fair value, and debt securities are exempt from these disclosure amendments.
The effective date of ASU 2010-20 differs for public and nonpublic companies. For public companies, the amendments that require
disclosures as of the end of a reporting period are effective for periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. The amendments that
require disclosures about activity that occurs during a reporting period are effective for periods beginning on or after December 15,
2010. For nonpublic companies, the amendments are effective for annual reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2011.
The Corporation adopted the required provisions of ASU 2010-20, with no significant impact on its financial condition or results of
operations.
ASU 2010-28: The amendments in this ASU modify Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative
carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely
than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that goodwill impairment exists, an entity
should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist. The qualitative factors are
consistent with the existing guidance and examples in paragraph 350-20-35-30, which requires that goodwill of a reporting unit be
tested for impairment between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair
value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount.
These amendments eliminate an entity’s ability to assert that a reporting unit is not required to perform Step 2 because the carrying
amount of the reporting unit is zero or negative despite the existence of qualitative factors that indicate the goodwill is more likely
than not impaired. As a result, goodwill impairments may be reported sooner than under current practice.
For public entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after
December 15, 2010. Early adoption is not permitted. For nonpublic entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim
periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Nonpublic entities may early adopt the amendments using the
effective date for public entities.
Upon adoption of the amendments, an entity with reporting units that have carrying amounts that are zero or negative is required to
assess whether it is more likely than not that the reporting units’ goodwill is impaired. If the entity determines that it is more likely
than not that the goodwill of one or more of its reporting units is impaired, the entity should perform Step 2 of the goodwill
impairment test for those reporting unit(s). Any resulting goodwill impairment should be recorded as a cumulative-effect adjustment
to beginning retained earnings in the period of adoption. Any goodwill impairments occurring after the initial adoption of the
amendments should be included in earnings as required by Section 350-20-35. The Corporation does not expect the adoption will
have a significant impact on the Corporation’s financial condition or results of operations.
ASU 2010-29: The objective of this ASU is to address diversity in practice about the interpretation of the pro forma revenue and
earnings disclosure requirements for business combinations.
Paragraph 805-10-50-2(h) requires a public entity to disclose pro forma information for business combinations that occurred in the
current reporting period. The disclosures include pro forma revenue and earnings of the combined entity for the current reporting
period as though the acquisition date for all business combinations that occurred during the year had been as of the beginning of the
annual reporting period. If comparative financial statements are presented, the pro forma revenue and earnings of the combined entity
78
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
for the comparable prior reporting period should be reported as though the acquisition date for all business combinations that occurred
during the current year had been as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period.
In practice, some preparers have presented the pro forma information in their comparative financial statements as if the business
combination that occurred in the current reporting period had occurred as of the beginning of each of the current and prior annual
reporting periods. Other preparers have disclosed the pro forma information as if the business combination occurred at the beginning
of the prior annual reporting period only, and carried forward the related adjustments, if applicable, through the current reporting
period.
The amendments in this ASU specify that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose
revenue and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the current year had occurred
as of the beginning of the comparable prior annual reporting period only.
The amendments in this ASU also expand the supplemental pro forma disclosures under ASC Topic 805 to include a description of
the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in
the reported pro forma revenue and earnings.
The amendments in this ASU are effective prospectively for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the
beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The Corporation
does not expect the adoption will have a significant impact on the Corporation’s financial condition or results of operations.
ASU 2011-01: The amendments in this ASU temporarily delay the effective date of the disclosures about troubled debt restructurings
in Update 2010-20 for public entities. Under the existing effective date in ASU 2010-20, public-entity creditors would have provided
disclosures about troubled debt restructurings for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2010. The delay is intended to allow the
Board time to complete its deliberations on what constitutes a troubled debt restructuring. The effective date of the new disclosures
about troubled debt restructurings for public entities and the guidance for determining what constitutes a troubled debt restructuring
will then be coordinated. Currently, that guidance is anticipated to be effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15,
2011.
The deferral in this amendment is effective upon issuance. The Corporation does not expect the adoption will have a significant
impact on the Corporation’s financial condition or results of operations.
79
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(24)
Summary of Quarterly Consolidated Financial Data (Unaudited)
The following table presents summarized quarterly financial data for 2010 and 2009.
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
2010 Quarter Ended
M arch 31
June 30
$
$
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
2009 Quarter Ended
M arch 31
June 30
$
$
$
$
$
$
0.17
0.17
-
$
$
0.19
0.19
-
$
$
0.11
0.11
-
$
$
0.17
0.17
-
7,354
2,853
4,501
160
4,341
816
4,269
888
153
735
128
607
7,565
3,609
3,956
933
3,023
941
3,868
96
(117)
213
128
85
September 30
7,554
$
2,567
4,987
975
4,012
824
4,352
484
4
480
128
352
$
December 31
7,555
$
2,562
4,993
575
4,418
873
4,448
843
101
742
129
613
$
September 30
7,886
$
3,216
4,670
1,108
3,562
909
4,230
241
(93)
334
128
206
$
December 31
7,892
$
3,217
4,675
7,000
(2,325)
945
4,232
(5,612)
(2,057)
(3,555)
129
(3,684)
$
7,685
2,660
5,025
925
4,100
901
4,052
949
158
791
129
662
7,993
3,262
4,731
479
4,252
861
4,341
772
59
713
129
584
$
$
$
0.02
0.02
0.20
$
0.17
0.17
0.16
$
0.06
0.06
0.16
$
(1.06)
(1.06)
-
Interest Income
Interest Expense
Net Interest Income
Provision for Loan and Lease Losses
Net Interest Income After Provision for Loan Losses
Noninterest Income
Noninterest Expense
Income Before Provision for Income Taxes
Provision for Income Taxes
Net Income
Preferred Stock Dividends and Discount Accretion
Net Income Available to Common Shareholders
Per Share Data:
Basic Earnings Per Share
Diluted Earnings Per Share
Cash Dividends
Interest Income
Interest Expense
Net Interest Income
Provision for Loan and Lease Losses
Net Interest Income (Loss) After Provision for Loan Losses
Noninterest Income
Noninterest Expense
Income (Loss) Before (Benefit from) Provision for Income Taxes
(Benefit from) Provision for Income Taxes
Net Income (Loss)
Preferred Stock Dividends and Discount Accretion
Net Income (Loss) Available to Common Shareholders
Per Share Data:
Basic (Loss) Earnings Per Share
Diluted (Loss) Earnings Per Share
Cash Dividends
80
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Mid Penn carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including the Chief Executive Officer
and Treasurer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15
as of December 31, 2010. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer concluded, as of December 31, 2010, that, Mid
Penn’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective in recording, processing, summarizing, and reporting information required to be
disclosed by Mid Penn, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and such information is accumulated and communicated
to management to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.
Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in Mid Penn’s internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of 2010 that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, Mid Penn’s internal control over financial reporting.
Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. Management Report on Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a and 15(d)
– 15(f) under the Exchange Act of 1934 (“1934 Act”). The corporation’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and
procedures that pertain to the corporation’s ability to record, process, summarize, and report reliable financial data. All internal control systems
have inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of human error and the
circumvention or overriding of internal control. Accordingly, even effective internal control over financial reporting can provide only reasonable
assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Further, because of changes in conditions, the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting may vary over time.
In order to ensure that the corporation’s internal control over financial reporting is effective, management regularly assesses such controls and
did so most recently for its financial reporting as of December 31, 2010. This assessment was based on criteria for effective internal control over
financial reporting described in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (“COSO”). Management has concluded that Mid Penn’s internal control over financial reporting, as of December 31, 2010, is
effective based on those criteria.
This annual report does not include an attestation report of Mid Penn’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control
over financial reporting. Mid Penn’s internal control over financial reporting was not subject to attestation by Mid Penn’s independent
registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit Mid Penn to provide only
management’s report in this annual report.
/s/ Rory G. Ritrievi
Rory G. Ritrievi
President and
Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Kevin W. Laudenslager
Kevin W. Laudenslager
Vice President and
Treasurer
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
None
81
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information required by this Item, relating to directors, executive officers, and control persons is set forth under the captions “Executive
Officers”, “Information Regarding Director Nominees and Continuing Directors”, “Compliance with Section 16(a) Reporting”, “Audit
Committee Report”, and “Governance of the Corporation” in Mid Penn’s definitive proxy statement to be used in connection with the 2011
Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which pages are incorporated herein by reference.
The Corporation has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to directors, officers and employees of the Corporation and the Bank. The
Corporation amended the Code of Ethics twice in 2005 and a copy of the Code of Ethics is included as Exhibit 14 to the Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 9, 2005. A request for the Corporation’s Code of Ethics can be made in writing to Kevin W.
Laudenslager, 349 Union Street, Millersburg, PA 17061, by telephone at 717-692-2133, or through the Mid Penn website at
www.midpennbank.com.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this Item, relating to executive compensation, is set forth under the captions “Compensation Discussion and
Analysis”, “Executive Compensation”, “Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change In Control”, “Election of Directors”, “Compensation
Committee Report” and “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” of Mid Penn’s definitive proxy statement to be used in
connection with the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which pages are incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED
SHAREHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by this Item, relating to beneficial ownership of Mid Penn’s common stock, is set forth under the caption “Beneficial
Ownership of Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.’s Stock Held By Principal Shareholders and Management” of Mid Penn’s definitive proxy statement to
be used in connection with the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which pages are incorporated herein by reference. Mid Penn does not
maintain any equity compensation plans.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this Item, relating to transactions with management and others, certain business relationships and indebtedness of
management, is set forth under the captions “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions” and “Governance of the Corporation” of Mid
Penn’s definitive proxy statement to be used in connection with the 2011 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which page is incorporated herein by
reference.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this Item, relating to the fees and services provided by Mid Penn’s principal accountant, is set forth under the
caption “Audit Committee Report” of Mid Penn’s definitive proxy statement to be used in connection with the 2011 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders, which page is incorporated herein by reference.
82
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
1. Financial statements are incorporated by reference in Part II, Item 8 hereof.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2. The financial statement schedules, required by Regulation S-X, are omitted because the information is either not applicable or is included
elsewhere in the consolidated financial statements.
3. The following Exhibits are filed as part of this filing on Form 10-K, or incorporated by reference hereto:
3(i)
3(ii)
The Registrant’s Articles of Incorporation. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Registrant’s Registration Statement
on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-156759.)
Statement with Respect to Shares for Series A Preferred Stock. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Registrant’s
Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 22, 2008.)
3(iii)
The Registrant’s By-laws. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) of Registrant’s Annual Report on form 10-K filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 10, 2008.)
4.1
10.1
10.2
Warrants for Purchase of Shares of Common Stock. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Registrant’s Current Report
on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 22, 2008.)
Mid Penn Bank’s Retirement Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Registrant’s Annual Report on form 10-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 10, 2008.) *
Mid Penn Bank’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Registrant’s Annual
Report on form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 10, 2008.) *
10.3 The Registrant’s Dividend Reinvestment Plan, as amended and restated. (Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s
Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed with the SEC on October 12, 2005.)
10.4 Split Dollar Agreement between Mid Penn Bank and Eugene F. Shaffer. (Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2005.) *
10.5 Death Benefit Plan and Agreement between Mid Penn Bank and the Trustee of the Eugene F. Shaffer Irrevocable Trust.
(Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 14, 2005.) *
10.6
10.7
Severance Agreement dated as of November 26, 2008 between Mid Penn Bank and Alan W. Dakey. (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on December 1, 2008.) *
Letter Agreement, dated as of December 19, 2008, Between Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. and the United States Department of
the Treasury, which includes the Securities Purchase Agreement – Standard Terms attached thereto, with respect to the
issuance and sale of the Series A Preferred Stock and the Warrants. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to
Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 22, 2008.)
10.8
Employment Agreement, dated as of February 25, 2009, between Mid Penn Bank and Rory G. Ritrievi (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on March 2, 2009.)*
11
Statement re: Computation of Per Share Earnings. (Incorporated by reference to Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.)
12
Statements re: Computation of Ratios. (Incorporated by reference to Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.)
83
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
The Registrant’s Code of Ethics. (Incorporated by reference to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
14
Commission on March 9, 2005.)
21
Subsidiaries of Registrant.
23
Consent of ParenteBeard LLC.
31.1
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Principal Executive Officer.
31.2
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Principal Financial Officer.
32
Principal Executive and Financial Officer’s §1350 Certifications.
99.1
Listing of Mid-Atlantic Custom Peer Group Banks.
99.2
Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to the Economic Stabilization Act of 2008.
99.3
Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to the Economic Stabilization Act of 2008.
*
Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
84
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
By:
/s/ Rory G. Ritrievi
Rory G. Ritrievi
President and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: March 21, 2011
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of
the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By:
By:
/s/ Rory G. Ritrievi
Rory G. Ritrievi
President, Chief Executive Officer and
Director (Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Kevin W. Laudenslager
Kevin W. Laudenslager
Vice President, Treasurer
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal
Accounting Officer)
By:
By:
By:
By:
By:
By:
By:
By:
By:
By:
/s/ Robert A. Abel
Robert A. Abel, Director
/s/ Steven T. Boyer
Steven T. Boyer, Director
/s/ Jere M. Coxon
Jere M. Coxon, Director
/s/ Matthew G. DeSoto
Matthew G. DeSoto, Director
/s/ Robert C. Grubic
Robert C. Grubic, Director
/s/ Gregory M. Kerwin
Gregory M. Kerwin, Director
/s/ Theodore W. Mowery
Theodore W. Mowery, Director
/s/ Donald E. Sauve
Donald E. Sauve, Director
/s/ Edwin D. Schlegel
Edwin D. Schlegel, Director
/s/ William A. Specht, III
William A. Specht, Director
March 21, 2011
March 21, 2011
March 21, 2011
March 21, 2011
March 21, 2011
March 21, 2011
March 21, 2011
March 21, 2011
March 21, 2011
March 21, 2011
March 21, 2011
March 21, 2011
85
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
EXHIBIT 21
Name
Mid Penn Bank
SUBSIDIARIES OF REGISTRANT
State of Incorporation
Pennsylvania
Mid Penn Insurance Services, LLC
Pennsylvania
86
EXHIBIT 23
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (Registration No.
333-170833) filed with the SEC on November 24, 2010, Form S-3/A (Registration No. 333-39341) filed with the SEC
on October 7, 2005, Form S-3D (Registration No. 333-128958) filed with the SEC on October 12, 2005, and Form S-
3 (Registration No. 333-156759) filed with the SEC on January 16, 2009 (effective February 4, 2009) of Mid Penn
Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated March 21, 2011, relating to the consolidated financial statements which appears in
the Annual Report on Form 10K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
/s/ ParenteBeard LLC
ParenteBeard LLC
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
March 21, 2011
87
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
CERTIFICATION
EXHIBIT 31.1
I, Rory G. Ritrievi, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.;
2.
3.
4.
Based on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
(a)
(b)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of the internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.
By __/s/ Rory G. Ritrievi__ ___
President and CEO
Date: March 21, 2011
88
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
CERTIFICATION
EXHIBIT 31.2
I, Kevin W. Laudenslager, certify that:
1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.;
2.
3.
4.
Based on my knowledge, the report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the
period covered by this report.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on
such evaluation; and
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):
(a)
(b)
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of the internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls over financial reporting.
By __/s/ Kevin W. Laudenslager__ ___
Vice President and Treasurer
Date: March 21, 2011
89
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS ADDED BY SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
EXHIBIT 32
In connection with the annual report of Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. (the “Corporation”) on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Rory G. Ritrievi, President and CEO, and I, Kevin W.
Laudenslager, Treasurer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as added pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
2. To my knowledge, the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects the financial condition and
results of operations of Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Report.
By __/s/ Rory G. Ritrievi________
President and CEO
Date: March 21, 2011
By __/s/ Kevin W. Laudenslager ____
Vice President and Treasurer
Date: March 21, 2011
90
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Company
1st Colonial Bancorp, Inc.
1st Constitution Bancorp
1st Summit Bancorp of Johnstown, Inc.
Absecon Bancorp
ACNB Corporation
Adirondack Trust Company
Allegheny Valley Bancorp, Inc.
American Bank Incorporated
AmeriServ Financial, Inc.
Annapolis Bancorp, Inc.
Apollo Bancorp, Inc.
Ballston Spa Bancorp, Inc.
Bancorp of New Jersey, Inc.
Bank of Akron
Bank of Utica
Berkshire Bancorp Inc.
Brunswick Bancorp
Calvin B. Taylor Bankshares, Inc.
Carrollton Bancorp
CB Financial Corp
CB Financial Services, Inc.
CBT Financial Corporation
CCFNB Bancorp, Inc.
Cecil Bancorp, Inc.
Chemung Financial Corporation
Chesapeake Bancorp
Citizens Financial Services, Inc.
Citizens National Bank of Meyersdale
Clarion County Community Bank
Codorus Valley Bancorp, Inc.
CommerceFirst Bancorp, Inc.
Commercial National Financial Corporation
Community Bank of Bergen County
Community Bankers' Corporation
Community First Bancorp, Inc.
Community First Bank
Community National Bank
Community Partners Bancorp
Cornerstone Financial Corp.
Country Bank Holding Company, Inc.
County First Bank
Damascus Community Bank
Delaware Bancshares, Inc.
Delhi Bank Corp.
Delmar Bancorp
Dimeco, Inc.
DNB Financial Corporation
Eagle National Bancorp, Inc.
Exhibit 99.1
Mid-Atlantic Custom Peer Group
City
State
NJ
Collingswood
NJ
Cranbury
PA
Johnstown
NJ
Absecon
PA
Gettysburg
Saratoga Springs NY
PA
Pittsburgh
PA
Allentown
PA
Johnstown
MD
Annapolis
PA
Apollo
NY
Ballston Spa
NJ
Fort Lee
NY
Akron
NY
Utica
NY
New York
NJ
New Brunswick
MD
Berlin
MD
Columbia
DE
Rehoboth Beach
PA
Carmichaels
PA
Clearfield
PA
Bloomsburg
MD
Elkton
NY
Elmira
MD
Chestertown
PA
Mansfield
PA
Meyersdale
PA
Clarion
PA
York
MD
Annapolis
PA
Latrobe
NJ
Maywood
PA
Marion Center
PA
Reynoldsville
NJ
Somerset
NY
Great Neck
NJ
Middletown
NJ
Mount Laurel
NY
New York
MD
La Plata
MD
Damascus
NY
Walton
NY
Delhi
MD
Salisbury
PA
Honesdale
PA
Downingtown
PA
Upper Darby
Company
Easton Bancorp, Inc.
Elmer Bancorp, Inc.
Embassy Bancorp, Inc.
Emclaire Financial Corp.
Empire National Bank
ENB Financial Corp
Enterprise Financial Services Group, Inc
Enterprise National Bank N.J.
ES Bancshares, Inc.
Evans Bancorp, Inc.
Farmers and Merchants Bank
Fidelity D & D Bancorp, Inc.
First Bank
First Bank of Delaware
First Community Financial Corporation
First Keystone Corporation
First National Bank of Groton
First Resource Bank
First State Bank
Fleetwood Bank Corporation
FNB Bancorp, Inc.
FNBM Financial Corporation
FNBPA Bancorp, Inc.
Fort Orange Financial Corp.
Franklin Financial Services Corporation
Frederick County Bancorp, Inc.
Glen Burnie Bancorp
Glenville Bank Holding Company, Inc.
GNB Financial Services, Inc.
Gotham Bank of New York
Greater Hudson Bank, National Association
Hamlin Bank and Trust Company
Harbor Bankshares Corporation
Harford Bank
Harvest Community Bank
Herald National Bank
Highlands Bancorp, Inc.
Hilltop Community Bancorp, Inc.
Honat Bancorp, Inc.
Hopewell Valley Community Bank
Howard Bancorp, Inc.
IBW Financial Corporation
Jeffersonville Bancorp
Jonestown Bank and Trust Co.
JTNB Bancorp, Inc.
Juniata Valley Financial Corp.
Kinderhook Bank Corporation
Kish Bancorp, Inc.
City
State
MD
Easton
NJ
Elmer
PA
Bethlehem
PA
Emlenton
NY
Islandia
PA
Ephrata
PA
Allison Park
NJ
Kenilworth
NY
Newburgh
NY
Hamburg
MD
Upperco
Dunmore
PA
Williamstown NJ
DE
Wilmington
PA
Mifflintown
PA
Berwick
NY
Groton
PA
Exton
NJ
Cranford
PA
Fleetwood
PA
Newtown
PA
Minersville
PA
Port Allegany
NY
Albany
PA
Chambersburg
MD
Frederick
MD
Glen Burnie
NY
Scotia
PA
Gratz
NY
New York
NY
Middletown
PA
Smethport
MD
Baltimore
MD
Aberdeen
NJ
Pennsville
NY
New York
NJ
Vernon
NJ
Summit
PA
Honesdale
NJ
Pennington
MD
Ellicott City
DC
Washington
NY
Jeffersonville
PA
Jonestown
PA
Jim Thorpe
PA
Mifflintown
NY
Kinderhook
PA
Reedsville
91
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Mid-Atlantic Custom Peer Group (continued)
Exhibit 99.1 (continued)
Steuben Trust Corporation
Stewardship Financial Corporation
Sussex Bancorp
Tri-County Financial Corporation
Turbotville National Bancorp, Inc.
UNB Corporation
Union Bancorp, Inc.
Union National Financial Corporation
Unity Bancorp, Inc.
VSB Bancorp, Inc.
West Milton Bancorp, Inc.
Wilber Corporation
Woodlands Financial Service Company
Hornell
Midland Park
Franklin
Waldorf
Turbotville
Mount Carmel
Pottsville
Lancaster
Clinton
Staten Island
West Milton
Oneonta
Williamsport
NY
NJ
NJ
MD
PA
PA
PA
PA
NJ
NY
PA
NY
PA
Landmark Bancorp, Inc.
Liberty Bell Bank
Luzerne National Bank Corporation
Lyons Bancorp, Inc.
Madison National Bancorp Inc.
Mainline Bancorp, Inc.
Manor Bank
Mars National Bank
Maryland Bankcorp, Inc.
Mauch Chunk Trust Financial Corp.
Mercersburg Financial Corporation
Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.
Mifflinburg Bank & Trust Company
MNB Corporation
Muncy Bank Financial, Inc.
National Bank of Coxsackie
National Capital Bank of Washington
Neffs Bancorp, Inc.
New Jersey Community Bank
New Millennium Bank
New Tripoli Bancorp, Inc.
New Windsor Bancorp, Inc.
Northumberland Bancorp
Norwood Financial Corp.
Old Line Bancshares, Inc.
Orange County Bancorp, Inc.
Parke Bancorp, Inc.
Pascack Bancorp, Inc.
Patapsco Bancorp, Inc.
Penn Bancshares, Inc.
Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc.
Penseco Financial Services Corporation
Peoples Bancorp, Inc.
Peoples Financial Services Corp.
Peoples Limited
PSB Holding Corporation
Putnam County National Bank of Carmel
QNB Corp.
Regal Bancorp, Inc.
Republic First Bancorp, Inc.
Rising Sun Bancorp
Riverview Financial Corporation
Rumson-Fair Haven Bank & Trust Co.
Scottdale Bank & Trust Company
Shore Community Bank
Solvay Bank Corporation
Somerset Hills Bancorp
Somerset Trust Holding Company
PA
Pittston
NJ
Marlton
PA
Luzerne
NY
Lyons
NY
Hauppauge
PA
Ebensburg
PA
Manor
Mars
PA
Lexington Park MD
PA
Jim Thorpe
PA
Mercersburg
PA
Millersburg
PA
Mifflinburg
PA
Bangor
PA
Muncy
NY
Coxsackie
DC
Washington
Neffs
PA
NJ
Freehold
New Brunswick NJ
PA
New Tripoli
MD
New Windsor
PA
Northumberland
PA
Honesdale
MD
Bowie
NY
Middletown
NJ
Sewell
NJ
Westwood
MD
Dundalk
NJ
Pennsville
PA
Williamsport
PA
Scranton
MD
Chestertown
PA
Hallstead
PA
Wyalusing
MD
Preston
NY
Carmel
PA
Quakertown
MD
Owings Mills
PA
Philadelphia
MD
Rising Sun
PA
Halifax
NJ
Rumson
PA
Scottdale
NJ
Toms River
NY
Solvay
NJ
Bernardsville
PA
Somerset
92
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Exhibit 99.2
I, Rory G. Ritrievi, certify, based on my knowledge, that:
(i) The compensation committee of Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has discussed, reviewed, and evaluated with senior risk officers at least every six
months during any part of the most recently completed fiscal year that was a TARP period (the applicable period), the senior executive officer
(SEO) compensation plans and the employee compensation plans and the risks these plans pose to Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.;
(ii) The compensation committee of Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has identified and limited during the applicable period any features of the SEO
compensation plans that could lead SEOs to take unnecessary and excessive risks that could threaten the value of Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc., and
identified any features of the employee compensation plans that pose risks to Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. and has limited those features to ensure
that Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. is not unnecessarily exposed to risks;
(iii) The compensation committee has reviewed, at least every six months during the applicable period, the terms of each employee
compensation plan and identified any features of the plan that could encourage the manipulation of reported earnings of Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.
to enhance the compensation of an employee, and has limited those features that would encourage the manipulation of reported earnings of Mid
Penn Bancorp, Inc.;
(iv) The compensation committee of Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. will certify to the reviews of the SEO compensation plans and employee
compensation plans required under (i) and (iii) above;
(v) The compensation committee of Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. will provide a narrative description of how it limited during the applicable period
the features in (A) SEO compensation plans that could lead SEOs to take unnecessary and excessive risks that could threaten the value of Mid
Penn Bancorp, Inc.; (B) Employee compensation plans that unnecessarily expose Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. to risks; and (C) Employee
compensation plans that could encourage the manipulation of reported earnings of Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. to enhance the compensation of an
employee;
(vi) Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has required that bonus payments, as defined in the regulations and guidance established under section 111 of
EESA (bonus payments), of the SEOs and twenty next most highly compensated employees be subject to a recovery or “clawback” provision
during any part of the most recently completed fiscal year that was a TARP period if the bonus payments were based on materially inaccurate
financial statements or any other materially inaccurate performance metric criteria;
(vii) Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has prohibited any golden parachute payment, as defined in the regulations and guidance established under section
111 of EESA, to an SEO or any of the next five most highly compensated employees during the applicable period.
(viii) Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has limited bonus payments to its applicable employees in accordance with section 111 of EESA and the
regulations and guidance established thereunder during the applicable period;
(ix) Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. and its employees have complied with the excessive or luxury expenditures policy, as defined in the regulations and
guidance established under section 111 of EESA, during the applicable period; and any expenses requiring approval of the board of directors, a
committee of the board of directors, an SEO, or an executive officer with a similar level of responsibility, were properly approved;
(x) Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. will permit a non-binding shareholder resolution in compliance with any applicable Federal securities rules and
regulations on the disclosures provided under the Federal securities laws related to SEO compensation paid or accrued during the applicable
period;
(xi) Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. will disclose the amount, nature, and justification for the offering during the applicable period of any perquisites, as
defined in the regulations and guidance established under section 111 of EESA, whose total value exceeds $25,000 for any employee who is
subject to the bonus payment limitations identified in paragraph (viii);
(xii) Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. will disclose whether Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc., the board of directors of Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc., or the
compensation committee of Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has engaged during the applicable period, a compensation consultant; and the services the
compensation consultant or any affiliate of the compensation consultant provided during this period;
(xiii) Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has prohibited the payment of any gross-ups, as defined in the regulations and guidance established under section
111 of EESA, to the SEOs and the next twenty most highly compensated employees during the applicable period;
93
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
(xiv) Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has substantially complied with all other requirements related to employee compensation that are provided in the
agreement between Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. and Treasury, including any amendments;
(xv) Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has submitted to Treasury a complete and accurate list of the SEOs and the twenty next most highly compensated
employees for the current fiscal year and the most recently completed fiscal year, with the non-SEOs ranked in descending order of level of
annual compensation, and with the name, title, and employer of each SEO and most highly compensated employee identified; and
(xvi) I understand that a knowing and willful false or fraudulent statement made in connection with this certification may be punished by fine,
imprisonment, or both.
Exhibit 99.2 (continued)
Signed: /s/ Rory G. Ritrievi_________
Rory G. Ritrievi
Date: March 21, 2011
94
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
Exhibit 99.3
I, Kevin W. Laudenslager, certify, based on my knowledge, that:
(i) The compensation committee of Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has discussed, reviewed, and evaluated with senior risk officers at least every six
months during any part of the most recently completed fiscal year that was a TARP period (the applicable period), the senior executive officer
(SEO) compensation plans and the employee compensation plans and the risks these plans pose to Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.;
(ii) The compensation committee of Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has identified and limited during the applicable period any features of the SEO
compensation plans that could lead SEOs to take unnecessary and excessive risks that could threaten the value of Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc., and
identified any features of the employee compensation plans that pose risks to Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. and has limited those features to ensure
that Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. is not unnecessarily exposed to risks;
(iii) The compensation committee has reviewed, at least every six months during the applicable period, the terms of each employee
compensation plan and identified any features of the plan that could encourage the manipulation of reported earnings of Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc.
to enhance the compensation of an employee, and has limited those features that would encourage the manipulation of reported earnings of Mid
Penn Bancorp, Inc.;
(iv) The compensation committee of Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. will certify to the reviews of the SEO compensation plans and employee
compensation plans required under (i) and (iii) above;
(v) The compensation committee of Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. will provide a narrative description of how it limited during the applicable period
the features in (A) SEO compensation plans that could lead SEOs to take unnecessary and excessive risks that could threaten the value of Mid
Penn Bancorp, Inc.; (B) Employee compensation plans that unnecessarily expose Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. to risks; and (C) Employee
compensation plans that could encourage the manipulation of reported earnings of Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. to enhance the compensation of an
employee;
(vi) Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has required that bonus payments, as defined in the regulations and guidance established under section 111 of
EESA (bonus payments), of the SEOs and twenty next most highly compensated employees be subject to a recovery or “clawback” provision
during any part of the most recently completed fiscal year that was a TARP period if the bonus payments were based on materially inaccurate
financial statements or any other materially inaccurate performance metric criteria;
(vii) Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has prohibited any golden parachute payment, as defined in the regulations and guidance established under section
111 of EESA, to an SEO or any of the next five most highly compensated employees during the applicable period.
(viii) Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has limited bonus payments to its applicable employees in accordance with section 111 of EESA and the
regulations and guidance established thereunder during the applicable period;
(ix) Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. and its employees have complied with the excessive or luxury expenditures policy, as defined in the regulations and
guidance established under section 111 of EESA, during the applicable period; and any expenses requiring approval of the board of directors, a
committee of the board of directors, an SEO, or an executive officer with a similar level of responsibility, were properly approved;
(x) Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. will permit a non-binding shareholder resolution in compliance with any applicable Federal securities rules and
regulations on the disclosures provided under the Federal securities laws related to SEO compensation paid or accrued during the applicable
period;
(xi) Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. will disclose the amount, nature, and justification for the offering during the applicable period of any perquisites, as
defined in the regulations and guidance established under section 111 of EESA, whose total value exceeds $25,000 for any employee who is
subject to the bonus payment limitations identified in paragraph (viii);
(xii) Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. will disclose whether Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc., the board of directors of Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc., or the
compensation committee of Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has engaged during the applicable period, a compensation consultant; and the services the
compensation consultant or any affiliate of the compensation consultant provided during this period;
(xiii) Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has prohibited the payment of any gross-ups, as defined in the regulations and guidance established under section
111 of EESA, to the SEOs and the next twenty most highly compensated employees during the applicable period;
95
MID PENN BANCORP, INC.
(xiv) Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has substantially complied with all other requirements related to employee compensation that are provided in the
agreement between Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. and Treasury, including any amendments;
(xv) Mid Penn Bancorp, Inc. has submitted to Treasury a complete and accurate list of the SEOs and the twenty next most highly compensated
employees for the current fiscal year and the most recently completed fiscal year, with the non-SEOs ranked in descending order of level of
annual compensation, and with the name, title, and employer of each SEO and most highly compensated employee identified; and
(xvi) I understand that a knowing and willful false or fraudulent statement made in connection with this certification may be punished by fine,
imprisonment, or both.
Exhibit 99.3 (continued)
Signed: /s/ Kevin W. Laudenslager_________
Kevin W. Laudenslager
Date: March 21, 2011
96