More annual reports from Mortgage Choice Limited:
2019 ReportPeers and competitors of Mortgage Choice Limited:
Southern Missouri BancorpM
o
r
t
g
a
g
e
C
h
o
i
c
e
A
n
n
u
a
l
R
e
p
o
r
t
2
0
0
6
A N N U A L R E P O R T
2 0 0 6
C H A I R M A N ’ S R E P O R T
1
C O N T E N T S
M A N A G I N G D I R E C T O R ’ S O V E R V I E W
2 - 3
F I N A N C I A L H I G H L I G H T S
4
R E V I E W O F O P E R AT I O N S
5 -7
S T R AT E G Y AT A G L A N C E
8
O U T L O O K
9
B O A R D O F D I R E C T O R S
1 0
S E N I O R M A N A G E M E N T
11
C O R P O R AT E G O V E R N A N C E N O T E
12 -1 6
F I N A N C I A L R E P O R T
17
D I R E C T O R S ’ R E P O R T
1 8 - 3 2
C H A I R M A N ’ S R E P O R T
Despite challenging competitive market conditions
nationally, I am delighted to report Mortgage
Choice has achieved another strong year of growth.
Our Franchise network and their commitment to
satisfying customers’ needs, combined with our
terrific staff, has been central to our success.
The financial result for the year to 30 June 2006 was a net
Franchise growth improved on the prior year, with net
profit after tax (AGAAP) of $14.8 million, up 16% on the
Franchise numbers increasing by 16 to 423 as at 30 June
previous period. The Board has declared a second half fully
2006 up from 407 in the previous year. The current state
franked dividend of 7.5 cents per share, bringing the total
of the employment market, the competition for new
ordinary dividend for the year to 12.5 cents per share. This
Franchisees and a continuing and deliberate focus on quality
represents a payout ratio of almost 100% for the year to
candidates over quantity, continues to create a challenging
30 June 2006. In addition, at the interim results we were
environment for recruitment.
delighted to reward shareholders with a special dividend
of 2.0 cents, bringing the total payout for the year to 14.5
cents fully franked. Since listing in August 2004, 24.3 cents
in dividends has been paid. I am sure shareholders are
pleased with this outcome.
This business is built on a series of partnerships. A
critical partnership is our Franchise network, a team of
committed, entrepreneurial, independent businessmen and
businesswomen who put enormous energy and time into
meeting their customers’ needs and, as a result, grow their
Earnings per share was 12.6 cents per share compared to
own businesses. I have had the opportunity to meet many
10.9 cents per share in FY2005.
Our housing loan approvals during the financial year to 30
June 2006 showed strong growth, totalling $10.6 billion up
15% on the previous year of $9.3 billion.
Our loan book has grown to $25.7 billion at year’s end, 18%
up on the previous year. The expected average life of loans
has remained at 3.8 years. This is an outstanding result in a
very competitive market.
Broker / Franchise Growth
���
���
���
���
���
���
���
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�������
����������
���
���
���
���
���
��
��
���
���
���
���
���
���
���
����
����
����
����
����
����
����
�������������
�����������������������������
Our growth in broker numbers has been pleasing with the
total broker network increasing to 620 as at 30 June 2006,
up from 574 in the previous year. At the same time our shop
front numbers grew by 22 to 185 permanent outlets.
This combined growth demonstrates that our existing Franchise
owners are confident about the future and willing to invest in
their businesses to accommodate further expansion.
Franchisees over the past year and I am always blown away
by their drive, energy and passion for their customers and
their businesses.
Our lender partners are also critical as they provide us
with the products and services demanded by customers.
Our overriding objective is to work in an empathetic and
mutually beneficial relationship with our lenders.
To our staff, my heartiest congratulations. Their commitment
to supporting the Franchise network is unparalleled.
Managing Director Paul Lahiff has led the team brilliantly
through another challenging and successful year.
As Australia’s leading mortgage broker, we enter a new
financial year well positioned to compete and grow. The
Directors believe that we can continue to exceed our
stakeholders expectations next year and beyond.
I look forward to continuing to work alongside a motivated
team of high achieving Franchisees and their staff, successful
lending partners and a talented management team and
staff, and achieving even greater success for Mortgage
Choice in future years.
�������������������������������
������������������
�����������������
���������������
�������������������
�����������
��������
������
����������
������������
���������
�������
�������
�������
�������
�������
�������
�������
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
������
������
������
������
�
1
��
��
��
��
��
��
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
����
����
����
����
����
����
����
����
����
����
����
����
����������
��������������
������������������������������
���������������
�����������������������
���
���
���
���
���
���
��
��
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
��������������������
��������������������������
������ ������
������ ������
������ ������
������ ������
������
����
����
����
����
����
����
����
����
����
����
����
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
M A N A G I N G D I R E C T O R ’ S
O V E R V I E W
The Australian appetite for housing continued unabated in the year under review.
Notwithstanding the impact on the household budget of interest rate rises
and rising fuel prices, Australians continue to aspire to own their own home.
���
���
���
�������
����������
���
���
���
���
���
���
���
of the resources boom, while Victoria and South Australia
Queensland have continued their robust growth off the back
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
T HE HOUSI NG FI N A N CE M A RK E T
��
���
���
��
���
Throughout the year there was much written and discussed
���
���
���
about the property market and the direction of housing
���
���
���
�
����
finance. We took the view in our forecast for the financial
����
�������������
year to 30 June 2006, that there would be a downturn in
�����������������������������
����
����
����
����
����
demand but not a crash.
Based on current ABS data, the number of new loans
written overall remains relatively consistent with past years.
This is in spite of a flat housing market in New South
Wales. By contrast, Western Australia and to a lesser extent
have been steady performers.
The chart below shows the trend in residential housing loan
approvals over time, together with interest rates. There is
a strong correlation between the lower interest rate band
commencing in 1998 and the upward and sustained demand
for residential housing finance.
Housing Finance Market and Mortgage Interest Rates 1984 – 2006
�������������������������������
������������������
�����������������
���������������
�������������������
�����������
��������
������
����������
������������
���������
�������
�������
�������
�������
�������
�������
�������
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
������
������
������
������
�
����
����
����
����
����
����
����
����
����
����
����
����
����������
��������������
������������������������������
���������������
2
�����������������������
��
��
��
��
��
��
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
���
���
���
���
���
���
��
��
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
��������������������
��������������������������
������ ������
������ ������
������ ������
������ ������
������
����
����
����
����
����
����
����
����
����
����
����
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
���
���
���
���
���
���
���
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�������
����������
���
���
���
���
���
��
��
���
���
���
���
���
���
���
����
����
����
����
����
����
����
�������������
�����������������������������
����������
������������
���������
�������
�������
�������
�������
�������
�������
�������
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
������
������
������
������
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�������������������������������
������������������
�����������������
���������������
�������������������
�����������
��������
������
In May 2006, the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) increased
These include:
��
��
��
��
��
the cash rate to 5.75%. In the months leading up to this
decision, there was a strong shift towards fixed rate loans,
which represented around 30% of Mortgage Choice’s
approvals. Consumers took the opportunity to lock in a
rate in advance of the anticipated interest rate rise. Since
that time the percentage slowly declined (but is still at
historically high levels), which suggests consumers are either
more confident about interest rates going forward or, have
become more attuned to the realities of the market.
����
����
����
����
����
����
����
■ Mortgage Industry Association of Australia (MIAA)
��
Awards Retail Mortgage Broker of the Year – 2006;
■ Australian Mortgage Awards Best Branding – 2005;
■ Australian Mortgage Awards Most Effective Internet
�
�
■ Australian Banking & Finance Magazine – Best Mortgage
Presence – 2005; and
�
�
Broker – 2005.
�
����
����
����
The above recognition was also complemented by one of
����
����
A pleasing aspect of the current housing market is the
���������������
our Franchise owners, Susan Mason from Mandurah, WA,
����������
increasing participation of First Home Buyers, which
��������������
������������������������������
being the recipient of the MIAA Operator of Year 2006.
�����������������������
averaged around 18% of all dwellings financed for the year
The work undertaken to enhance our Franchise induction-
to 30 June 2006. This compares with a level of 12.6% in
training module, which now includes Certificate IV in Financial
March 2004.
Services (Finance & Mortgage Broking) – a minimum entry-level
While housing finance commitments have continued to be
education requirement for loans consultants – is testimony
robust, system growth – the growth in outstanding “stock”
to our commitment to the professional development of our
of housing loans – continues to record steady growth of
Franchise network, both new and existing.
around 13% annualised. Although this is down from a peak
It is pleasing to note that, Victorian Franchise owner, James
of 21% in 2003, it still represents very healthy growth in the
Glenwright on completing the Certificate IV course was
mortgage market.
recognised for achieving the top honour nationwide.
Growth in Housing Credit (incl securitisations)
June 2002 – June 2006.
���
���
���
���
���
���
��
��
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
��������������������
��������������������������
����
����
����
����
����
����
����
����
����
����
����
PA RT N ER SH I P S
The relationship with our Franchise partners is of paramount
importance. The principal vehicle through which high-level
discussion takes place is through our democratically elected
Franchise Advisory Council (FAC). The FAC continues to be
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
�
highly effective and provides a valuable bridge between
Franchisor and Franchisee. This important body meets
throughout the year and also meets with the Board twice
a year. Discussions also take place at our quarterly State
Conferences, our National Conference and a range of other
������ ������
������ ������
������ ������
������ ������
������
state based and regional meetings.
REGU L AT I O N
Mortgage Choice has a strong interest in any regulatory
developments that protect consumers and increase consumer
confidence in dealing with the mortgage broking sector.
Accordingly, regulation of the mortgage broking industry
remains a critical part of Mortgage Choice’s strategic agenda.
In November 2004, the NSW Department of Fair Trading
released a Discussion Paper on a proposal for National
Uniform Regulation. As part of our continued push for
greater consumer protection, Mortgage Choice lodged a
comprehensive response. A regulatory impact statement was
expected later in 2005.
It is disappointing therefore, to find that the industry still
awaits further developments.
PERF O RM A N CE
The year under review for Mortgage Choice has been very
pleasing. The strength and reputation of our business model
and the Franchise network have been recognised through a
number of industry accolades.
A pleasing validation of the success of the Franchise team is the
continued high ratings customers give to our Franchise owners
and their staff. A survey is conducted each month of 200
recent customers and in two very important areas of potential
for repeat and referral business, Mortgage Choice consistently
scores in the high 80 percentile and over. Indeed over the past
12 months, in these two key areas, we achieved an average
rating of 92.8% for the potential for repeat business while
93.6% indicated they would refer family and friends.
Naturally, the results we detail in the following pages require
two further effective partnerships: the constant innovation
and flexibility of our lender panel and the enthusiasm and
dedication of our staff.
Finally, I want to acknowledge the support of the Board
throughout the past year. Their commitment to the
vision and ideals of the Company have made a profound
contribution to the success of the Company. In particular,
Peter Ritchie, our Chairman, contributed his talent and
experience at a range of functions for Franchisees and other
business partners throughout the year.
I look forward to driving the business to another successful
year for its stakeholders in FY2007.
3
F I N A N C I A L H I G H L I G H T S
All figures quoted are based on AGAAP unless otherwise
Mortgage Choice Limited achieved a record net profit after
stated.
tax for the year ended 30 June 2006 of $14.8 million, up
■ Record net profit after tax $14.8 million, up 16% on
16% on the previous corresponding period.
FY2005 $12.7 million. (AIFRS $17.9 million).
Total revenue for the year to 30 June 2006 was $126.2
■ Total revenue $126.2 million, up 14% on previous period
(AIFRS $142.1 million).
■ Earnings per share 12.6 cents per share compared to 10.9
cents per share in FY2004. (AIFRS 15.2 cents per share).
■ Dividend 7.5 cents per share brings FY2006 total to 14.5
cents per share including a special dividend of 2.0 cents.
■ Trailing commission of $63 million up as % of total
commission income to 51.2% for FY2006 compared with
50.17% in FY2005.
million, including total commission income of $123.1 million.
This included $60.1 million derived from new mortgage
origination, up 13.0% on the previous year. Trailing
commission income increased to $63.0 million, now 51.2%
of total commission income.
The average size of loans written by Mortgage Choice
brokers has continued to increase, and now stands at
$248,800 higher than the ABS average of $221,100 (June
2006). This reflects the strength of the Mortgage Choice
broker network especially in the eastern states of Australia
■ Mortgage Choice handled $10.6 billion in housing loan
where property prices are higher.
approvals during FY2006 and continues to achieve
industry high productivity levels per broker.
■ Loan book now stands at $25.7 billion, 18% up on
Net assets at 30 June 2006 were $9.3 million (AGAAP)
compared to $9.8 million at 30 June 2005. The balance
sheet is underpinned by $8.4 million in cash on hand
FY2005, this compares to system growth of 13%
(2005 – $11.5 million).
Cash flow from operating activities during the year was
$12.8 million compared to $13.8 million in the previous year.
year on year.
■ Total broker growth strong, increasing to 620 as at
30 June 2006, up from 574 in the previous
corresponding period.
■ Franchise growth was higher than the previous
corresponding period with Franchise numbers increasing to
423 as at 30 June 2006, up from 407 in the previous year.
■ A total of 64.5% of commission revenues was paid to
Franchise owners compared to 62.0% for the previous
period.
■ Over the past 12 months, an average of 92.8% of
customers indicated a willingness to conduct repeat
business while an average of 93.6% indicated they would
refer family and friends to Mortgage Choice.*
*Source – Mortgage Choice 2006 Customer Satisfaction Survey.
4
R E V I E W O F O P E R AT I O N S
CO MPE T I T I V E A DVA N TAGE
Mortgage Choice believes that the combination of the
A CO MPL E X M A RK E T PL ACE
M A DE E A S Y
fundamental components of its business model provide it
Mortgage Choice assists customers in the selection of
with significant competitive advantages over other brokers in
a mortgage from a complex range of products from its
the marketplace:
■ high quality service: Mortgage Choice continually aims
to provide a high level of support to its Franchisees,
in marketing, technology, training/professional
development, legal and compliance;
■ franchise business model: Mortgage Choice operates
through a national network of Franchisees. The
relationship between the Franchisees and the Company
is underpinned by the Franchisees being incentivised
to grow their business whilst valuing the services and
policies provided by the Company;
■ brand: Mortgage Choice is recognised as a leading
consumer brand and has been built upon a proposition
of being transparent in its dealings with, and an advocate
for, the customer;
■ no product of its own: Unlike some of its competitors,
Mortgage Choice does not distribute its own products,
instead choosing to treat all lenders and products equally;
■ strength of lender relationships: Mortgage Choice
generates significant volume and quality of loans for
lenders and this places it in a strong position to shape
key operational relationships with lenders; and
■ economies of scale: Mortgage Choice’s business model
is scaleable, allowing it to grow its originations and loan
book without growing its cost base at the same rate,
thus giving Mortgage Choice financial strength and
stability.
lender panel by identifying the most suitable loan, based
on an individual’s particular needs. Customers are provided
a choice across a broad range of over 330 housing loan
products offered by a panel of 27 of Australia’s leading
lenders, representing each major category of lender.
Mortgage Choice brokers use the Company’s proprietary
software system to compare the customer’s financial
situation and loan requirements with the products offered
by the lender panel. The system generates a list showing
which lenders would approve the customer’s application
according to details given. Based upon the customer’s
circumstances, the broker then uses the system, together
with their own experience and expertise, to analyse features
of loan products in order to identify those most suitable for
the customer.
Completed loan application forms are submitted and
followed up by the broker on the customer’s behalf, thereby
saving the customer time and the associated administrative
burden. These services are provided at no direct cost to the
customer.
‘THE FRANCHISE ADVISORY
COUNCIL CONTINUES TO BE HIGHLY
EFFECTIVE AND PROVIDES A
VALUABLE BRIDGE BETWEEN
FRANCHISEE AND FRANCHISOR’
5
EL ECT RO N I C LO DGEMEN T
FR A N CH ISE O PER AT I O NS
Electronic lodgement allows faster turnaround time for loan
Mortgage Choice licenses the use of the Mortgage Choice
applications by taking data input direct from the broker to
brand and business systems to its Franchise network.
the lender’s underwriting system.
Accredited loan consultants (mortgage brokers) comprise
Mortgage Choice submitted its first loans electronically in
Franchisees and their loan consultants.
May 2004. In FY2006, $3.8 billion in new loans were lodged
The relationship between Mortgage Choice and its
electronically. This represents a significant increase on the
Franchisees is governed by a Franchise Agreement and an
previous year when $1.0 billion in new loans were lodged.
Operations Manual that sets out the Company’s policies and
To date, 13 lenders are participating. With an expected
procedures, including minimum performance standards. We
increase in participating lenders over the next 12 months, it
abide by the Franchising Code of Conduct.
is anticipated there will again be an appreciable increase in
the volumes submitted through this platform.
Franchisees may grow their businesses by acquiring other
Franchises. Franchisees who own more than one Franchise
Significantly reduced approval times are already being
are called Multiple Franchise Owners (MFOs).
experienced, and the end beneficiary of this improved
service is the consumer. In addition, our lender partners
benefit from cost savings and increased efficiency while our
Franchisees benefit from improved productivity.
L EN DER PA RT N ER S
Mortgage Choice recognises the importance of developing
and nurturing the relationships between broker and
lender. Dedicated specialist staff oversee the operational
relationship between the Company and its Franchisees and
the lender panel. This team provides lenders with structured
access to the Franchise network and promotes operational
effectiveness by working with lender partners to improve
service and processing efficiencies.
The panel includes Australia’s leading lenders, providing a
cross-section of products and lender types that Mortgage
Choice considers to be a representative spread of available,
quality housing loans.
Mortgage Choice believes the benefits enjoyed by lenders from
dealing with credible brokers such as Mortgage Choice include:
Mortgage Choice restricts the number of Franchisees it
recruits in each geographic region under its broker resource
model, which segments the market into postcode defined
marketing areas.
This model analyses the number of households and the
residential lending market size (based on Census data) in
each postcode, and allocates Franchises based on target
market share in each area.
Mortgage Choice Franchisees come from a variety of
backgrounds and the Company believes that sales ability,
inter-personal skills, commitment, energy and aspiration are
often more important than previous industry experience.
L E A RN I NG A N D DE V ELO PMEN T
Mortgage Choice is committed to delivering the most
knowledgeable, competent and ethical mortgage brokers
in the industry, by providing a continuous and powerful
learning and development program that is respected by
lenders, competitors and professional associations. The
learning program involves the delivery of skills, knowledge
■ volume: Brokers provide incremental mortgage business
and tools to enable the network to be the best they can be
that would not necessarily be generated through the
at what they do.
lender’s branch or other networks;
On joining Mortgage Choice, all Franchisees undertake
■ cost flexibility: By outsourcing an element of their
comprehensive training (accredited by the MIAA) which
origination business, lenders attract new business on a
now includes Certificate IV in Financial Services (Finance
& Mortgage Broking), lender accreditation and an in-the-
field mentoring program that is formally conducted on
a Franchise to Franchise basis. Once the initial training is
completed, brokers receive regular updates and support
from the state office infrastructure and at conferences.
A new e-Learning platform was introduced during the year
for the provision of ongoing mortgage origination, sales and
office productivity training for Franchisees and their staff.
variable cost basis;
■ education: Aided by specialist skills and product
knowledge, brokers educate consumers on the full
range of mortgage products offered by lenders on the
Company’s panel;
■ geographic expansion: Brokers have facilitated low
cost geographic expansion for lenders into areas where
branch networks are less extensive or do not exist;
■ profitability: By originating mortgages of a higher
average loan size and potentially of a longer loan life,
broker sourced business can be as or more profitable
than business sourced through the branch or other
networks; and
■ efficiency: A broker’s familiarity and experience with
each lender’s process can increase the efficiency of the
lodgement and settlement process.
6
FR A N CH ISEE SU PP ORT SERV I CES
Mortgage Choice works closely with its Franchisees
in growing their businesses through assistance in lead
generation, training, brand and marketing support, field
support, regulatory compliance, information systems and
other ongoing support services. These services are provided
by group office staff located in Sydney (e.g. lender panel
negotiations and payment reconciliations) and state offices
that also provide a number of local administrative support
processes.
Mortgage Choice aims to continually improve the support,
resources and training offered to the Franchise network to
make their businesses as efficient as possible.
Mortgage Choice is committed to creating a strong
culture of compliance within the entire business. Legal and
regulatory compliance is a key operational issue and is an
essential part of sound corporate governance. The primary
source of compliance training for Mortgage Choice is
e-comply, which is a web based, self-paced question and
answer modular program.
BR A N DI NG, M A RK E T I NG
A N D PRO MOT I O N
Over a number of years, Mortgage Choice has created
a trusted and recognisable brand through its marketing
activities and a long-term brand strategy built upon
Mortgage Choice’s consumer advocacy.
Mortgage Choice’s marketing activities incorporate two
elements:
■ National, state, and regional marketing, managed by
group office; and
■ Local marketing activities, managed by Franchisees.
Group office engages in national and statewide marketing
that generates leads through the Mortgage Choice Customer
Service Centre, and aims to build a trustworthy brand
that may be leveraged by Franchisees in their local area
marketing. Customer Service Centre leads are distributed by
group office to the Franchise network on an equitable basis
by marketing area.
Mortgage Choice struck an alliance with the Real Estate
Institute of Australia (REIA), with their quarterly report
being rebadged as Mortgage Choice Real Estate Market
Facts Report. Given the positioning of the REIA as a highly
respected source of real estate expertise and analysis, the
alignment with the Mortgage Choice brand is strong. It is
envisaged that the alliance will be further leveraged over
the coming years through public relations and specific lead
generation activities.
Creating tools that assist Franchisees to build a healthy referral
network remains a key area, with more additions for the
referral marketing handbook planned for the coming year as
National campaigns are developed regularly and full
well as extensions to the program, such as referral rewards.
marketing support is provided to all Franchisees. This is
complemented by a well planned, proactive public relations
I N F ORM AT I O N T ECH N O LOGY
strategy designed to build and maintain a positive profile
Mortgage Choice has leveraged 14 years experience in
for Mortgage Choice by articulating Company and industry
the Australian market to develop proprietary software
understanding to consumers through media coverage on
to assist in matching our customer’s needs to the most
every level from local to national outlets.
suitable product from our panel of lenders. This software
allows our Franchisees to market to their prospects, capture
customer information and preferences, qualify potential loan
applicants, submit home loan applications to panel lenders
and reconcile payment of commissions.
Mortgage Choice recently implemented its third-generation
Mortgage Discovery™ system to accommodate changes
to our Franchisee’s evolved business structures, deliver
improved customer relationship management capability and
provide a platform for continued business growth.
‘MORTGAGE CHOICE RECOGNISES THE
IMPORTANCE OF DEVELOPING AND NURTURING THE
RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN BROKER AND LENDER’
7
S T R AT E G Y AT A G L A N C E
During the year Mortgage Choice conducted a review of strategy. The business
subsequently reaffirmed its focus on organic growth. The strategic platform for the
business going forward will therefore be the following:
S T RO NG M A RK E T I NG ME A NS:
■ effort and substantial incremental investment in
differentiated branding; and
■ maintaining current activity to maintain business leads
even in unsettled market conditions.
RECRU I T MEN T ME A NS:
■ increase the total number of Franchisees and loan
consultants; and
Over the last 12 months, the strong growth in the number
of retail premises has continued. Franchisees are choosing,
where appropriate, to relocate their offices or opening new
shop-fronts, kiosks or heavily branded offices in high street
retail strips and shopping centres. The retail network grew
by 22 to 185 permanent outlets in the year to 30 June 2006.
The ongoing growth in the retail footprint is being driven
by Franchisees who see the move into retail as a profitable
growth strategy for their business. Locating Mortgage
Choice outlets close to other complementary businesses and
■ continuously strive to improve the quality of new recruits.
increasing the presence in local communities continues to
L EN DER PA RT N ER SH I P ME A NS:
■ maintaining high quality loan submissions and
bring new and repeat customers to Mortgage Choice.
The benefits to customers from a larger retail footprint, of
greater channel choice and strengthening the Mortgage
professionalism in all aspects of the relationship and,
Choice brand, will ensure the growth in the number of retail
being recognised for it.
premises continues.
EFFI CI EN CY ME A NS:
■ boosting current network productivity, not just network
size;
■ deploying our staff where we get best value from them;
■ seamless project implementation and execution; and
■ a listening partnership.
SHO P GROW T H ME A NS:
■ create a supportive infrastructure to facilitate franchise
retail growth where appropriate;
■ ‘best practice’ development; and
■ access to quality information.
8
O U T L O O K
Mortgage Choice operates as a residential mortgage
specialist and this has facilitated consistent growth via a
focused approach and a refinement of expertise.
Mortgage Choice intends to remain focused on the
administration, and a preference by lenders to deal with a
residential mortgage broking market. The Company believes
smaller number of larger, high quality broker organisations.
that, given the relative immaturity of the broking sector, the
The Company will be alert to acquisition opportunities given
overall size of the housing finance market and the attraction
this environment, but will review any opportunity cautiously
of the broking proposition to consumers, there remains
and prudently.
strong potential for brokers as a whole to increase their
Clearly however, the major focus of the business is on
share of mortgage origination and for Mortgage Choice to
organic growth.
increase its market share within the broking sector.
Mortgage Choice believes this focus on its core competency
SU MM A RY
represents a low risk, high potential growth strategy.
Mortgage Choice is confident that it is well placed to achieve
Incremental revenues from ‘add on’ products such as
Insurance and Commercial Property Lending should allow
Mortgage Choice to benefit from economies of scale, as
profitable growth in the coming year. Tight expense control,
improved broker recruitment and the ability to scale up the
business with minimal additional cost will continue to be
growth in these product areas can be largely managed with
important going forward.
the existing Mortgage Choice infrastructure and resources.
Mortgage Choice expects some consolidation to occur in
the mortgage broking industry. A number of factors could
potentially act as catalysts, including a stricter regulatory
environment, economies of scale in marketing, support and
9
B O A R D O F D I R E C T O R S
PE T ER RI TCH I E
N O N - E X ECU T I V E CH A I R M A N
Cha ir ma n of N o minat i o n a n d R e mun e rat i o n Co mmi t te e s
BCo m, F CPA , AO
Peter is Deputy Chairman of Seven Network and University of NSW Foundation, and Chairman of Reverse
Corp Limited. Peter previously served as Managing Director of McDonald’s Australia from 1974 to 1995
and as its Chairman from 1995 to 2001. Peter was a Director of Westpac Banking Corporation from 1993
to 2002 and Solution 6 Holdings from 2000 to 2002. Age 64.
PAU L L A H I FF
M A N AG I N G D I R EC TO R
BS c Ag r, FA I M
Paul has over 25 years experience in the financial services industry. This includes roles as Managing
Director of Permanent Trustee Limited from 1999 to 2002 and Heritage Building Society, as well as senior
executive roles with Westpac Banking Corporation (in Sydney and London) and the credit union sector.
Paul joined Mortgage Choice as Chief Executive Officer in August 2003 and was appointed Managing
Director in May 2004. He is responsible for managing Company operations to ensure continued growth
and development of the business. Age 53.
PE T ER H IGGI NS
N O N - E X ECU T I V E D I R EC TO R
M e m b e r of Au d i t Co mmi t te e
Peter is co-founder of Mortgage Choice. He is also a Director of a technology company – Power & Data
Corporation Pty Ltd. Having been successfully self-employed for over 20 years, Peter has been involved
in a number of companies in a diverse range of industries covering manufacturing, technology, leasing,
property and finance. Age 46.
RO DN E Y H IGGI NS
N O N - E X ECU T I V E D I R EC TO R
M e m b e r of N o minat i o n a n d R e mun e rat i o n Co mmi t te e s
Rodney is co-founder of Mortgage Choice. Rodney has a background in residential and commercial
property, sales, leasing and has been a Director of companies involved in manufacturing, wholesaling,
importing, retailing and finance. Age 51.
DEBO R A H R A L S TO N
N O N - E X ECU T I V E D I R EC TO R
M e m b e r of Au d i t Co mmi t te e
P h D, F F in, FA I M , F CPA
Deborah is Professor and Pro Vice Chancellor of the Division of Business Law and Information Sciences at the
University of Canberra. Deborah was formerly Director of the Centre for Australian Financial Institutions at
the University of Southern Queensland and a former Director of Heritage Building Society. Age 53.
S T E V E J ERM Y N
N O N - E X ECU T I V E D I R EC TO R
Cha ir ma n of Au d i t Co mm i t te e
F CPA
Steve joined McDonald’s Australia Ltd in 1984 and was appointed Vice President in 1986. Steve joined the
Board of Directors in 1986 and was appointed Executive Vice President in 1993. In June 1999, Steve was
appointed Deputy Managing Director. Steve has been involved in all aspects of the development of the
McDonald’s restaurant business in Australia and brings with him significant experience in the development
of new business and franchising. He retired from McDonald’s Australia in 2005 but remains a Director.
Steve is also a Director of Reverse Corp Limited. Age 57.
10
S E N I O R M A N A G E M E N T
Profiles of senior management other than Paul Lahiff are set
This area has major responsibilities in the management,
out below:
TO N Y CROSSL E Y
CH I E F O P ER AT I N G O F F I CER
Tony has over 15 years experience in senior financial roles
within the financial services industry, including 10 years
development and support of the Mortgage Choice Franchise
system. Brent has a Bachelor of Applied Science from the
University of Western Sydney.
WA RREN O’ROU RK E
N AT I O N A L CO R P O R AT E A F FA I R S M A N AG ER
in the international insurance and reinsurance industries,
Warren holds a Marketing Degree from the University of
and, from early 2000, three years as CFO and then CEO
Technology, Sydney. Warren has over 20 years experience
of Mortgage Choice. After a period as CFO of Macquarie
in financial services and corporate social responsibility in
Bank’s Securitised Lending Division, where he had
marketing and communications, covering both corporate
responsibility for management of funding, financial and risk
and consulting roles. Warren joined Mortgage Choice as
management activities of its Australian and US mortgage
Group Manager, Marketing and Communications in March
operations, Tony returned to Mortgage Choice in early
1999. In August 2002, Warren was appointed National
2005. Tony is responsible for effective working relationships
Corporate Affairs Manager and is responsible for corporate
between Mortgage Choice and its Franchisees as well as
affairs, public relations, communications and media issues.
operations, sales and lender relationships.
A DA M FR A SER
CH I E F F I N A N CI A L O F F I CER
Adam holds an Economics Degree from the University of
Nottingham and is a qualified accountant, with over 14 years
experience in various accounting, corporate finance and private
LY N N E W YAT T
N AT I O N A L M A R K E T I N G M A N AG ER
Lynne has over 15 years experience in marketing financial
services, including experience in providing marketing
support services to a franchise network. Lynne joined
Mortgage Choice in May 2006 and is responsible for brand,
equity roles in the UK and Australia. His role involves directing
development of advertising messages, media placement and
and controlling the financial activities of the organisation as
strategic marketing programs, as well as delivering a range
well as providing financial assessments and information to
of sales support tools.
ensure planning and budgeting activities meets corporate
goals. Adam joined Mortgage Choice in March 2003.
DEBR A PL AY ER
N AT I O N A L L E N D I N G M A N AG ER
M A RK N E W TO N
CH I E F I N F O R M AT I O N O F F I CER
Debra has over 20 years experience in the finance sector.
As National Lending Manager, she is responsible for the
Mark has over 19 years experience in information
development and communication of lender strategy,
technology, including 13 years in senior management
co-ordination of lender interaction with the Franchise
positions. Mark joined Mortgage Choice in May 2000. As
network and monitoring of industry trends. Debra joined
Chief Information Officer, Mark is responsible for IT strategy,
Mortgage Choice in July 2004. She holds a Graduate Diploma
applications development and infrastructure management.
in Finance and Bank Management, is a Fellow of Finsia and
He is also Chairman of the Franchise Advisory Council. Mark
Fellow and Councillor for the Institute of Financial Services.
holds a Diploma in Computer Programming Technology
and a Business Management Certificate from the Australian
Institute of Management.
M I CH A EL W RI T ER
N AT I O N A L H U M A N R E S O U R CE S M A N AG ER
DAV I D HOSK I NS
CO M PA N Y S ECR E TA RY
Formerly National Manager Leadership and Talent
Development with Deloitte and having worked previously
at AMP Bank, Aussie Home Loans and Westpac, Michael’s
David commenced with Mortgage Choice in June 2000. He
experience covers line management positions as well as
has a Bachelor of Commerce from the University of NSW and
organisational development activity. Michael is responsible
is a CPA and a member of Chartered Secretaries Australia,
for planning, development and implementation of the
from which he has a Graduate Diploma in Corporate
Franchisor’s HR practices, ensuring policies and procedures
Management. David has had over 20 years experience in
are effective and complied with.
a variety of accounting and company secretarial functions
primarily in the finance and insurance industries. As
Company Secretary, David is responsible for implementing
and monitoring corporate governance practices, compliance
and corporate standards, administrating Board and
Shareholder matters, and co-ordinating legal counsel.
BREN T M cDO N A L D
G R O U P F R A N CH I S E O P ER AT I O N S M A N AG ER
M A I T L A N D BA RDW EL L
N AT I O N A L B U S I N E S S D E V E LO P M E N T M A N AG ER
Maitland holds an MBA from the Australian Graduate School
of Management and a Bachelor of Economics from the
University of Queensland. Following five years in strategic and
operations roles in Telstra’s Consumer and Marketing division,
he joined Mortgage Choice in 2004 with the responsibility of
developing a retail strategy and managing the growth of the
Brent has over 20 years experience in franchising and small
business management. He joined Mortgage Choice in
Mortgage Choice retail footprint. With retail disciplines now
embedded in core operations, Maitland now has responsibility
November 1998 and is responsible for Franchise Operations.
for driving a number of key strategic projects.
11
C O R P O R A T E G O V E R N A N C E N O T E
Mortgage Choice has in place corporate governance practices to ensure the Company is effectively directed and managed, risks
are monitored and assessed, and appropriate disclosures are made.
A description of the Company’s main corporate governance practices is set out below.
The Company considers that it substantially complies with the ASX Corporate Governance Council’s Principles of Good Corporate
Governance and Best Practice Recommendations, with the following exception:
■ compliance with the requirement that the Board comprise a majority of independent non-executive Directors.
T HE BOA RD
The Board comprises Mortgage Choice’s Managing Director, two non-executive Directors and three independent non-executive
Directors including the Chairman, Peter Ritchie. Steve Jermyn and Deborah Ralston were appointed as non-executive Directors in
the period to the Company’s listing on the ASX. These individuals bring a long history of public company, operational and
franchising experience with them and assist in overseeing the corporate governance of Mortgage Choice. Details of the Directors’
experience, expertise, qualifications, term of office and independent status are set out in the Directors’ report under the heading
‘Board of Directors’ on page 10.
Responsibility for day-to-day management and administration of the Company is delegated by the Board to the Managing
Director and the executive team.
The Board operates in accordance with the broad principles set out in its charter which is available in the Shareholder Centre
section of the Company’s website at www.mortgagechoice.com.au.
Board size, composition and independence
The Charter states that:
■ there must be a minimum of five Directors and a maximum of seven Directors.
■ the Board must comprise:
– a majority of independent non-executive Directors;
– Directors with an appropriate range of skills, experience and expertise;
– Directors who can understand and competently deal with current and emerging business issues; and
– Directors who can effectively review and challenge the performance of management and exercise independent judgment.
■ the nomination committee is responsible for recommending candidates for appointment to the Board.
■ each Director is appointed by a formal letter of appointment setting out the key terms and conditions of their appointment to
ensure that each Director clearly understands the Company’s expectations of him or her.
The Board is not presently comprised of a majority of independent non-executive Directors. At this time the view of the Board is
that the present skills and experience of the Directors has provided an operationally effective Board without the expense of an
additional Director. However, the Board will continue to give consideration to increasing the number of Directors to seven by the
appointment of an additional non-executive Director if it is considered that the skills and experience brought by the individual
supplement those of the existing Board.
Role and responsibilities
The Board acts on behalf of Shareholders and is accountable to Shareholders for the overall direction, management and corporate
governance of the Company.
The Board is responsible for:
■ overseeing the Company, including its control and accountability systems;
■ appointing and removing the Managing Director;
■ monitoring the performance of the Managing Director;
■ monitoring senior management’s implementation of strategy, and ensuring appropriate resources are available;
■ reporting to Shareholders;
■ providing strategic advice to management;
■ approving management’s corporate strategy and performance objectives;
■ determining and financing dividend payments;
■ approving and monitoring the progress of major capital expenditure, capital management, acquisitions and divestitures;
12
■ approving and monitoring financial and other reporting;
■ reviewing and ratifying systems of risk management, internal compliance and control, and legal compliance to ensure
appropriate compliance frameworks and controls are in place;
■ reviewing and overseeing the implementation of the Company’s corporate code of conduct and code of conduct for Directors
and senior executives;
■ approving charters of Board committees;
■ monitoring and ensuring compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and ethical standards and policies; and
■ monitoring and ensuring compliance with best practice corporate governance requirements.
Directors’ independence
The Board Charter sets out specific principles in relation to Directors’ independence.
These state that an independent non-executive Director is one who is independent of management and:
■
is not a substantial shareholder of the Company or an officer of, or otherwise associated directly with, a substantial
shareholder of the Company;
■ within the last three years has not been employed in an executive capacity by the Company or another group member, or
been a Director after ceasing to hold any such employment;
■ within the last three years has not been a principal of a material professional adviser or a material consultant to the Company
or another group member, or an employee materially associated with the service provided;
■
is not a material supplier or customer of the Company or other group member, or an officer of or otherwise associated directly
or indirectly with a material supplier or customer;
■ has no material contractual relationship with the Company or another group member other than as a Director of the
Company;
■ has not served on the Board for a period which could, or could reasonably be perceived to, materially interfere with the
Director’s ability to act in the best interests of the Company; and
■
is free from any interest in any business or other relationship which could, or could reasonably be perceived to, materially
interfere with the Director’s ability to act in the best interests of the Company.
All Directors are required to complete an independence questionnaire.
Independent professional advice
Board committees and individual Directors may seek independent external professional advice for the purposes of proper
performance of their duties.
Performance assessment
The performance of the Board, the Directors and key executives is reviewed annually.
The nomination committee is responsible for reviewing:
■ the Board’s role;
■ the processes of the Board and Board committees;
■ the Board’s performance; and
■ each Director’s performance before the Director stands for re-election.
The process for performance evaluation of the Board, its committees and individual Directors, and key executives has
been adopted by the Board and is available in the Shareholder Centre section of the Company’s website at
www.mortgagechoice.com.au.
A review of the Board was conducted by the Chairman of the nomination committee in concert with the Company Secretary
during the financial year ended 30 June 2006.
13
Corporate governance continued
BOA RD COMM I T T EES
Mortgage Choice has three Board committees comprising the remuneration committee, the audit committee and the nomination
committee. These committees serve to support the functions of the Board and will make recommendations to Directors on issues
relating to their area of responsibility.
The remuneration committee
The remuneration committee is responsible for determining and reviewing compensation arrangements for the Directors and
senior management team. The remuneration committee comprises Peter Ritchie and Rodney Higgins.
The objective of the remuneration committee is to help the Board achieve its objective of ensuring the Company:
■ has coherent remuneration policies and practices to attract and retain executives and Directors who will create value for
Shareholders;
■ observes those remuneration policies and practices; and
■ fairly and responsibly rewards executives and other employees having regard to the performance of the Company, the
performance of the executive or employee and the general and specific remuneration environment.
Non-executive Directors are not entitled to retirement benefits with the exception of statutory superannuation.
The remuneration committee charter is available in the Shareholder Centre section of the Company’s website at
www.mortgagechoice.com.au.
The audit committee
The audit committee provides advice and assistance to the Board in fulfilling the Board’s responsibilities relating to:
■ financial reporting;
■ the application of accounting policies;
■ business policies and practices;
■
legal and regulatory compliance; and
■
internal risk control and management systems.
The audit committee comprises Steve Jermyn (Chairman), Peter Higgins and Deborah Ralston.
The objective of the audit committee is to:
■ maintain and improve the quality, credibility and objectivity of the financial accountability process; and
■ provide a forum for communication between the Board and senior financial and compliance management.
The audit committee charter is available in the Shareholder Centre section of the Company’s website at
www.mortgagechoice.com.au.
The nomination committee
The objective of the nomination committee is to help the Board achieve its objective of ensuring the Company has a board of an
effective composition, size and commitment to adequately discharge its responsibilities and duties. The nomination committee is
responsible for evaluating the Board’s performance. The nomination committee comprises Peter Ritchie and Rodney Higgins.
The nomination committee charter is available in the Shareholder Centre section of the Company’s website at
www.mortgagechoice.com.au.
CO DES O F CO N DUCT
The Company has adopted a corporate code of conduct setting out its legal and other obligations to all legitimate stakeholders
including Shareholders, Franchisees, employees, customers and the community.
The Company has also adopted a code of conduct for Directors and senior executives setting out required standards of behaviour,
for the benefit of all Shareholders. The purpose of this code of conduct is to:
■ articulate the high standards of honesty, integrity, ethical and law-abiding behaviour expected of Directors and senior
executives;
■ encourage the observance of those standards to protect and promote the interests of Shareholders and other stakeholders
(including Franchisees, employees, customers, suppliers and creditors);
■ guide Directors and senior executives as to the practices thought necessary to maintain confidence in the Company’s integrity;
and
14
■ set out the responsibility and accountability of Directors and senior executives to report and investigate any reported violations
of this code or unethical or unlawful behaviour.
The Company requires that its Directors and senior executives adhere to a share trading policy that restricts the purchase and sale
of Company securities to three six-week periods following the release of the half-yearly and annual financial results to the market,
and the Annual General Meeting.
Copies of the Corporate Code of Conduct, the Code of Conduct for Directors and Senior Executives and the Share Trading Policy
are available on the Mortgage Choice website.
CORP OR AT E REP ORT I NG
The Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer have made the following certifications to the Board:
■ that the Company’s financial reports are complete and present a true and fair view, in all material respects, of the financial
condition and operational results of the Company and are in accordance with relevant accounting standards; and
■ that the above statement is founded on a sound system of risk management and internal compliance and control and which
implements the policies adopted by the Board and that the Company’s risk management and internal compliance and control
is operating efficiently and effectively in all material respects.
CO N T I N UOUS DISCLOSURE
The Company has adopted a market disclosure protocol. The objective of this protocol is to:
■ ensure the Company immediately discloses all price-sensitive information to ASX in accordance with the ASX Listing Rules and
the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth);
■ ensure officers and employees are aware of the Company’s continuous disclosure obligations; and
■ establish procedures for:
– the collection of all potentially price-sensitive information;
– assessing if information must be disclosed to ASX under the ASX Listing Rules or the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth);
– releasing to ASX information determined to be price-sensitive information and to require disclosure; and
– responding to any queries from ASX (particularly queries under Listing Rule 3.1B).
The protocol is carried out through a market disclosure group comprised of management representatives. The market disclosure
group is responsible for:
■ ensuring compliance with continuous disclosure obligations;
■ establishing a system to monitor compliance with continuous disclosure obligations and this protocol;
■ monitoring regulatory requirements so that this protocol continues to conform with those requirements;
■ monitoring movements in share price and share trading to identify circumstances where a false market may have emerged in
company securities; and
■ making decisions about trading halts.
All relevant information provided to ASX will be posted immediately on the Company’s website, www.mortgagechoice.com.au, in
compliance with the continuous disclosure requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and ASX Listing Rules.
COMMU N I CAT I O N TO SH A REHO L DER S
The Board aims to ensure that Shareholders are informed of all major developments affecting the Company’s state of affairs. The
Board will:
■ communicate effectively with Shareholders;
■ give Shareholders ready access to balanced and understandable information about the Company and its corporate goals; and
■ make it easy for Shareholders to participate in general meetings.
Information is communicated to Shareholders through ASX announcements, the Company’s annual report, annual general
meeting, half and full year results announcements and the Company’s website, www.mortgagechoice.com.au.
The Board has adopted a communications strategy to facilitate and promote effective communication with Shareholders and
encourage participation at general meetings. Arrangements the Company has to promote communication with Shareholders are
set out in the Shareholder Centre section of the Company’s website at www.mortgagechoice.com.au.
15
Corporate governance continued
E X T ERN A L AU DI TOR
The Company has adopted procedures for the selection and appointment of the external auditor which are set out in the
Shareholder Centre section of the Company’s website at www.mortgagechoice.com.au.
The audit committee will regularly review the performance of the external auditor and consider any ongoing appointment.
The external auditor should rotate the senior audit partner and the audit review partner every five years with suitable succession
planning to ensure consistency.
The external auditor should not place itself in a position where its objectivity may be impaired or where a reasonable person
might conclude that its objectivity has been impaired. This requirement also applies to individual members of an audit team. The
credibility and integrity of the financial reporting process is paramount. The Company has adopted guidelines on external auditor
independence. These guidelines help to ensure a consistent approach to the appointment and review of external auditors.
The Company will not give work to the external auditor likely to give rise to a ‘self review threat’ (as defined in Australian
Professional Statement F1, Professional Independence, The Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia and CPA Australia
2002). It is the policy of the external auditors to provide an annual declaration of their independence to the audit committee.
The external auditor is requested to attend the annual general meeting of the Company.
COMPL I A NCE A N D RISK M A N AGEMEN T
The Company has adopted and endorsed a compliance policy. The policy is a commitment to:
■ promote a culture of compliance throughout the Company and Franchise network;
■ create an understanding of the relevant laws at all levels;
■ minimise the possibility of a contravention of the law and manage any legal risk;
■ enhance the Company’s corporate image and customer service; and
■ market, promote and sell the Company’s services in a way that is competitive, ethical, honest and fair, and in compliance with
the law.
The Company has developed and implemented a compliance program. The aim of the program is to promote a culture of
compliance through a number of measures including staff and Franchise network training, compliance procedures, support
systems and the appointment of staff responsible for compliance.
The centrepiece of the program is a web based compliance education and evaluation tool. A self paced system, it covers the key
legislative and regulatory obligations applicable to the business. Each major regulatory area (Trade Practices, Privacy, Equal
Opportunity, Occupational Health and Safety, Technology, Franchising, Credit Code) is covered. All current staff have completed
all modules and must do so a minimum of once per annum. New staff must complete the program within two months of
commencing employment. The Board is required to complete all modules. The program is also being rolled out to the Franchise
network.
The Company expects its employees, Franchisees and representatives to actively support its compliance program. It is each
employee, Franchisee and representative’s responsibility to make use of the training systems and support offered by Mortgage
Choice. Non-compliance with the law or failure to comply with the compliance program will not be tolerated and could result in
disciplinary action.
In order to comply with the Australian standard for risk management, the Company has initiated a corporate risk management
plan.
In fundamental terms, this process involves:
■ analysing all aspects of the business to determine what operational risks are faced, either on a continuous or isolated basis;
■ having determined these risks, assessing each of them to allocate a rating based upon the likelihood of occurrence and
consequence of occurrence;
■ determining what control measures are in place to eliminate or reduce the identified risk – this leads to allocating each risk a
rating, all of which is recorded in a risk register; and
■ executive management then make decisions as to how each risk is to be handled i.e. avoided, managed, transferred or
accepted. The Risk Register is a dynamic document that changes as business operations vary, resulting in new risks.
16
Mortgage Choice Limited.
Financial report
ACN 009 161 979. Financial report – 30 June 2006
Contents
Directors’ report
Income statements
Balance Sheets
Statements of changes in equity
Cash flow statements
18-32
34
35
36
37
Notes to the financial statements
38-78
Directors’ declaration
Independent audit report to members
of Mortgage Choice Limited
Shareholder information
Directory
79
80-82
83-84
85-86
This financial report covers both Mortgage Choice Limited as an individual
entity and the consolidated entity consisting of Mortgage Choice Limited and its
controlled subsidiaries. The financial report is presented in the Australian currency.
Mortgage Choice Limited is a company limited by shares, incorporated and
domiciled in Australia. Its registered office and principal place of business is:
Mortgage Choice Limited
Level 7, 182 – 186 Blues Point Road
North Sydney, NSW, 2060
A description of the nature of the Company’s operations and its principal activities
is included in the Directors’ report which is not part of this financial report.
The financial report was authorised for issue by the directors on 23 August 2006.
The Company has the power to amend and reissue the financial report.
Through the use of the internet, we have ensured that our corporate reporting
is timely, complete, and available globally at minimum cost to the Company. All
financial reports and other information are available at our Shareholders’ Centre
on the Mortgage Choice website: www.mortgagechoice.com.au
17
D I R E C T O R S ’ R E P O R T
Your Directors present their report on the consolidated entity consisting of Mortgage Choice Limited and the entities it controlled
at the end of, or during, the year ended 30 June 2006, referred to hereafter as “Mortgage Choice”, “the Mortgage Choice
Group” or “the Group”.
1. DI RECTOR S
The following persons were Directors of Mortgage Choice Limited during the whole of the financial year and up to the date of
this report:
P D Ritchie
P A Lahiff
P G Higgins
R G Higgins
S C Jermyn
D E Ralston
2. PRI NCI PA L ACT I V I T I ES
During the year the principal continuing activity of the Mortgage Choice group was mortgage broking. This activity involves:
■ the provision of assistance in determining the borrowing capacities of intending residential mortgage borrowers;
■ the assessment, at the request of those borrowers, of a wide range of home loan products; and
■ the submission of loan applications on behalf of intending borrowers.
3. DI V I DEN DS
Dividends paid or payable to members during the financial year were as follows:
A final ordinary dividend of $7.056 million (6.0 cents per fully paid share) was declared out of profits of the Company for the year
ended 30 June 2005 on 24 August 2005 and paid on 19 September 2005.
An interim ordinary dividend of $5.880 million (5.0 cents per fully paid share) was declared out of profits of the Company for the
half-year ended 31 December 2005 and paid on 21 March 2006.
A special dividend of $2.352 million (2.0 cents per fully paid share) was declared out of the retained profits of the Company as at
31 December 2005 and paid on 21 March 2006.
A final ordinary dividend of $8.819 million (7.5 cents per fully paid share) was declared out of profits of the Company for the year
ended 30 June 2006 on 23 August 2006 to be paid on 18 September 2006.
4. RE V I E W O F OPER AT I O NS
Information on the operations and financial position of the group and its business strategies and prospects is set out in the review
of operations and activities on pages 5-7 of this annual report.
5. SIGN I FI CA N T CH A NGES I N T HE S TAT E O F A FFA I R S
Except for the matters disclosed in the Operating Results and Review of Operations section of this annual report there have been
no significant changes in the state of affairs of the consolidated entity.
6. M AT T ER S SU BSEQU EN T TO T HE EN D O F T HE FI N A N CI A L Y E A R
Except for the matters disclosed in the Review of Operations section of this annual report or set out below, no other matter or
circumstance has arisen since 30 June 2006 that has significantly affected, or may significantly affect:
(a) the consolidated entity’s operations in future financial years; or
(b) the results of those operations in future financial years; or
(c) the consolidated entity’s state of affairs in future financial years.
7. L I K ELY DE V ELOPMEN T S A N D E X PECT ED RESU LT S O F OPER AT I O NS
Information on likely developments in the operations of the consolidated entity and the expected results of operations have not
been included in this report because the Directors believe it would be likely to result in unreasonable prejudice to the consolidated
entity.
18
8. EN V I RO N MEN TA L REGU L AT I O N
The consolidated entity is not subject to any significant environmental regulation under a law of the Commonwealth or of a State
or Territory in respect of its activities.
9. I N F ORM AT I O N O N DI RECTOR S
Details of the Directors of the Company in office during or since the end of the financial year, and each Director’s qualifications,
age, experience and special responsibilities are included on page 10 of this annual report.
Director
Peter Ritchie
Paul Lahiff
Peter Higgins
Rodney Higgins
Steve Jermyn
Deborah Ralston
Particulars of Directors’
interests in shares and options
350,125 ordinary shares
100,000 ordinary shares
Conditional entitlement to 180,300 ordinary shares under PSP *
747,300 options over ordinary shares granted under EPOP **
8,436,534 ordinary shares
19,991,583 ordinary shares
4,000,000 ordinary shares
50,000 ordinary shares
*PSP – Performance Share Plan as detailed in the remuneration report.
** EPOP – Executive Performance Option Plan as detailed in the remuneration report.
10. COMPA N Y SECRE TA RY
Details of the Secretary of the Company in office during or since the end of the financial year, and the Secretary’s qualifications,
experience and special responsibilities are included on page 11 of this annual report.
11. MEE T I NGS O F DI RECTOR S
The numbers of meetings of the Company’s Board of Directors and of each Board committee held during the year ended 30 June
2006, and the numbers of meetings attended by each Director were:
Peter Ritchie
Peter Higgins
Rodney Higgins
Paul Lahiff
Steve Jermyn
Deborah Ralston
Peter Ritchie
Peter Higgins
Rodney Higgins
Steve Jermyn
Deborah Ralston
Full meetings of Directors
Number of
meetings held
Number of meetings
attended
12
12
12
12
12
12
12
10
11
12
12
11
Committee Meetings
Audit Committee
Remuneration Committee
Number of
meetings held
Number of
meetings attended
Number of
meetings held
Number of
meetings attended
n/a
3
n/a
3
3
n/a
2
n/a
3
3
3
n/a
3
n/a
n/a
3
n/a
3
n/a
n/a
No nomination committee meetings were held during the year ended 30 June 2006.
19
Directors’ report continued
12. RE T I REMEN T, EL ECT I O N A N D
CO N T I N UAT I O N I N O FFI CE O F DI RECTOR S
In accordance with the Constitution, Peter Ritchie retires by rotation and, being eligible, offers himself for re-election.
In order to achieve an even spread of retiring Directors at future Annual General Meetings, Steve Jermyn will resign as a
director effective at the conclusion of the Annual General Meeting and, in accordance with the Constitution, has been nominated
for re-election.
13. REMU N ER AT I O N REP ORT
The remuneration report is set out under the following main headings:
A
B
C
D
E
Principles used to determine the nature and amount of remuneration
Details of remuneration
Service agreements
Share-based compensation
Additional information.
The information provided under headings A-D includes remuneration disclosures that are required under Accounting Standard
AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures. These disclosures have been transferred from the financial report and have been audited. The
disclosures in Section E are additional disclosures required by the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) and the Corporations Regulations
2001 which have not been audited.
A Principles used to determine the nature and amount of remuneration (audited)
The objective of the Company’s executive reward framework is to ensure reward for performance is competitive and
appropriate for the results delivered. The framework aligns executive reward with achievement of strategic objectives and
the creation of value for Shareholders, and conforms with market best practice for delivery of reward. The Board ensures
that executive reward satisfies the following key criteria for good governance practices:
■ competitiveness and reasonableness;
■ acceptability to shareholders;
■ performance linkage / alignment of executive compensation;
■ transparency; and
■ capital management.
In consultation with external remuneration consultants, the Company has structured an executive remuneration framework
that is market competitive and complimentary to the reward strategy of the organisation.
Alignment to Shareholders’ interests means:
■ has economic profit as a core component of plan design;
■ focuses on sustained growth in share price; and
■ attracts and retains high calibre executives.
Alignment to program participants’ interests means:
■ rewards capability and experience;
■ reflects competitive reward for contribution to growth in Shareholder value;
■ provides a clear structure for earning rewards; and
■ provides recognition for contribution.
The framework provides a mix of fixed and variable pay, and a blend of short and long-term incentives. As executives gain
seniority with the Group, the balance of this mix shifts to a higher proportion of “at risk” rewards.
20
Non-executive Directors
Fees and payments to non-executive Directors reflect the demands which are made on, and the responsibilities of, the
Directors. Non-executive Directors’ fees and payments are reviewed annually by the Board. The Board has also sought
independent research material to ensure non-executive Directors’ fees and payments, including those of the Chairman, are
appropriate and in line with the market. The Chairman’s fees are determined independently to the fees of non-executive
Directors based on comparative roles in the external market. Non-executive Directors do not receive share options.
Non-executive Directors may opt each year to receive a percentage of their remuneration in Mortgage Choice Limited
shares pursuant to the Employee Share Purchase Plan.
Directors’ fees
The base remuneration for the year ended 30 June 2006 was determined on 17 May 2005 and is based on the
recommendations of independent remuneration consultants. Directors do not receive additional remuneration for
representation on board committees.
Shareholders in a General Meeting on 5 April 2004 agreed to initially set the maximum aggregate remuneration of the
Board (excluding the Managing Director and any executive Director) at $750,000.
Retirement allowances for Directors
Non-executive Directors do not receive retirement allowances. Superannuation contributions in accordance with relevant
superannuation guarantee legislation is paid on non-executive Directors’ remuneration.
Executive pay
The executive pay and reward framework has four components:
■ base pay and benefits;
■ short-term performance incentives;
■
long-term incentives through participation in executive and employee share plans; and
■ other remuneration such as superannuation.
The combination of these comprises the executive’s total remuneration. The Company introduced long-term equity-linked
performance incentives specifically for executives during the year ending 30 June 2005 at the time of the listing of the
Company on the Australian Stock Exchange.
Base pay
Base pay is structured as a total employment cost package which may be delivered as a mix of cash and prescribed non-
financial benefits at the executives’ discretion.
Executives are offered a competitive base pay that comprises the fixed component of pay and rewards. External
remuneration consultants provide analysis and advice to ensure base pay is set to reflect the market for a comparable role.
Base pay for senior executives is reviewed annually to ensure the executive’s pay is competitive with the market. An
executive’s pay is also reviewed on promotion.
There are no guaranteed base pay increases in any senior executives’ contracts.
Benefits
Executives do not receive any benefits in addition to the remuneration identified in this remuneration report.
Retirement benefits
Retirement benefits are delivered under the Mortgage Choice Employees’ Superannuation Fund. This Fund is an
accumulation fund and provides benefits based on contributions made to the fund during the period of service. Other
retirement benefits may be provided directly by the Company if approved by Shareholders.
21
Directors’ report continued
Short-term incentives
Should the Company achieve a pre-determined profit target set by the Board then a pool of short-term incentive (STI) is
available for executives for allocation during the annual review. Cash incentives (bonuses) are payable in cash following the
signing of the Financial Report each year. Using a profit target ensures variable reward is only available when value has
been created for Shareholders and when profit is consistent with the business plan.
Each executive has a target STI opportunity depending on the accountabilities of the role and impact on the organisation
or business unit performance. For senior executives the normal maximum STI target bonus opportunity is 30.0% of total
base salary. However, from time to time for special projects and circumstances, bonuses outside of this structure are
provided.
Each year, the remuneration committee considers the appropriate targets and key performance indicators (KPIs) to link the
STI plan and the level of payout if targets are met. This includes setting any maximum payout under the STI plan, and
minimum levels of performance to trigger payment of STI.
For the year ended 30 June 2006, the KPIs linked to short term incentive plans were based on group, individual business
and personal objectives. The KPIs required performance in achieving specific profit objectives as well as other key, non-
financial measures linked to drivers of performance in the current and future reporting periods.
The short-term bonus payments may be adjusted up or down in line with under or over achievement against the target
performance levels. This is at the discretion of the remuneration committee.
The STI target annual payment is reviewed annually.
B Details of remuneration (audited)
Amounts of remuneration
Details of the remuneration of the Directors and the key management personnel (as defined in AASB 124 Related Party
Disclosures) are set out in the following tables.
The key management personnel of Mortgage Choice Limited and of the Group are the Directors of Mortgage Choice
Limited (see section 9: Information on directors) and those executives that report directly to the Managing Director. This
includes the 5 group executives who received the highest remuneration for the year ended 30 June 2006. The executives
are:
■ A D Crossley – Chief Operating Officer (3/10/2005 – 30/6/2006)
Chief Financial Officer (1/7/2005 – 3/10/2005)
■ A J Fraser –
Chief Financial Officer (3/10/2005 – 30/6/2006)
Corporate Finance & Strategy (1/7/2005 – 3/10/2005)
■ M C Newton – Chief Information Officer
■ D M Hoskins – Company Secretary
■ W J O’Rourke – National Manager Corporate Affairs
■ M N Writer – Human Resources Manager (19/9/05 – 30/6/06)
■ L A Wyatt –
National Marketing Manager (15/5/2006 – 30/6/2006)
■ D B Bayes –
Chief Operating Officer (1/7/2005 – 30/9/2005)
■
I C Pepper –
National Marketing Manager (1/7/2005 – 19/5/2006)
The cash bonuses detailed on the following page were dependent on the satisfaction of performance conditions as set out
in the section headed Short-term incentives above. The options and shares do not vest unless performance hurdles are
achieved, based on total Shareholder return, over a three-year period as set out in the section headed Share-based
compensation on page 25-28. No other elements of remuneration are directly related to performance.
22
Short-term benefits
Post-employment
Equity
Cash salary
and fees
$
Cash
bonus
$
Non-
monetary
benefits
$
Super-
annuation
$
Retirement
benefits
$
Rights &
Options
$
Total
$
Key management personnel of Mortgage Choice Limited
2006
Name
Non-executive Directors
P D Ritchie
Chairman
P G Higgins
R G Higgins
S C Jermyn
D E Ralston
1,000
55,000
55,000
55,000
55,000
–
–
–
–
–
–
99,000
9,000
–
–
–
–
4,950
4,950
4,950
4,950
99,000
28,800
Sub-total non-executive Directors
221,000
Executive Directors
P A Lahiff
Managing Director
Other key management personnel
A D Crossley
A J Fraser
M C Newton
D M Hoskins
W J O’Rourke
M N Writer
(From 19/9/05 to 30/6/06)
L A Wyatt
(From 15/5/06 to 30/6/06)
D S Bayes
(From 1/7/05 to 30/9/05)
I C Pepper
(From 1/7/05 to 19/5/06)
475,000
203,625
4,360
61,076
235,500
194,422
216,906
194,764
162,867
94,977
22,000
23,698
32,000
60,967
45,362
33,936
–
–
–
–
–
5,853
23,328
20,378
25,009
21,910
10,611
18,686
4,102
18,704
–
1,980
50,914
33,367
1,080
4,095
163,223
20,992
3,094
15,638
Total
2,031,573
453,947
128,100
239,604
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
109,000
59,950
59,950
59,950
59,950
348,800
80,230
824,291
24,492
307,018
13,326
260,126
21,538
324,420
12,352
280,241
11,222
237,322
3,443
121,226
–
23,980
(8,839)*
80,617
–
202,947
157,764
3,010,988
* In accordance with AASB 124, the amount relates to the reversal of share based payment expense due to the forfeiture of share rights and
options.
23
Short-term benefits
Post-employment
Equity
Cash salary
and fees
$
Cash
bonus
$
Non-
monetary
benefits
$
Super-
annuation
$
Retirement
benefits
$
Rights &
Options
$
Total
$
Directors’ report continued
2005
Name
Non-executive Directors
P D Ritchie
Chairman
P G Higgins
R G Higgins
S C Jermyn
D E Ralston
–
63,144
70,602
50,213
50,213
–
–
–
–
–
–
110,430
9,939
11,807
4,398
–
–
5,683
6,354
4,519
4,519
126,635
31,014
Sub-total non-executive Directors
234,172
Executive Directors
P A Lahiff
Managing director
Other key management personnel
A D Crossley
A J Fraser
M C Newton
D M Hoskins
I C Pepper
C P Canty
(from 1/7/04 to 31/12/04)
D S Bayes
(from 4/1/05 to 30/6/05)
P V Borg
(from 6/9/04 to 18/2/05)
E G Macgregor
(from 1/7/04 to 24/9/04)
443,029
88,767
6,668
48,737
79,636
155,000
198,384
–
53,667
50,322
–
–
–
182,360
40,000
164,091
32,049
2,115
2,959
7,167
18,780
22,384
20,012
17,653
125,409
116,666
12,099
20,858
89,523
99,006
–
–
2,063
8,057
1,320
8,285
66,080
54,212
440
11,762
Total
1,836,690
435,683
154,298
214,709
C Service agreements (audited)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
120,369
80,634
81,354
54,732
54,732
391,821
48,206
635,407
4,840
91,643
2,362
229,809
13,738
284,828
6,846
251,333
6,159
222,911
–
275,032
8,839
108,482
–
–
108,611
132,494
90,990
2,732,371
Remuneration and other terms of employment for the Managing Director and other key management personnel are set out
in their respective letters of employment. The employment letters do not prescribe the duration of employment for
executives. The periods of notice required to terminate employment are set out below:
■ the employment of Messrs Lahiff, Crossley, Fraser, Newton and Hoskins is terminable by either the Company or the
executive giving three month’s notice; and
■ the employment of Messrs O’Rourke and Writer and Ms Wyatt is terminable by either the Company or the executive
giving four week’s notice.
Except as set out below, no provision is made for termination payments other than amounts paid in respect of notice of
termination:
■ Messrs Crossley, Fraser, Newton and Hoskins will receive a non-competition termination benefit equal to 6 months base
salary where departure is for any reason other than misconduct; and
■ Mr Lahiff’s employment terms provide that in the event of the sale of the Company’s business or corporate restructure,
subject to certain conditions relating to length of service, Mr Lahiff will become entitled to a severance payment
equivalent to 12 months base salary, less any amounts paid in respect of notice of termination under the terms of his
employment.
24
D Share-based compensation (audited)
Executive Performance Option Plan (EPOP)
The Executive Performance Option Plan may be offered on an annual basis to a limited number of the most senior
executives within the Company. The issue of options has been confined to the Managing Director and the Company’s three
most senior executives, being the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Information Officer.
Participation in the EPOP provides one component of the market-based long-term incentive available to the selected
executives within their aggregate remuneration package.
Under the terms of the EPOP, options (each over one share) are granted to senior executives identified by the Board. Any
options offered and granted to the executives have an exercise price based on the market value of the Company’s shares at
the time of offer. Market value will be the trade-weighted average price of the Company’s shares over the one-week period
immediately preceding the date of offer.
The options offered to executives under the EPOP are subject to performance conditions set by the Board. Offers have a
three-year performance period. In relation to options offered during the year ended 30 June 2006, the performance
requirement will be based on the total Shareholder Return (TSR) of the Company compared to the TSRs of a comparator
group of companies. TSR is the percentage increase in the Company’s share price plus reinvested dividends, expressed as a
percentage of the initial investment, and reflects the increase in value delivered to Shareholders over the period.
The Company’s TSR will be compared to the TSRs of companies in a comparator group comprised of selected S & P ASX
Top 300 companies, being entities of broadly similar size to that of Mortgage Choice, but excluding mining and resource
companies and property trust companies or trusts, over the performance period. The comparator companies were drawn
from a group within an approximate range of 40% to 200% of the market capitalisation of Mortgage Choice at the time
of listing.
The companies comprising the comparator group are iiNET Limited, Invocare Limited, Clough Limited, Programmed
Maintenance Services Limited, Rebel Sport Limited, Sunland Group Limited, Globe International Limited, Psivida Limited,
Village Life Limited, Capral Aluminium Limited, Brazin Limited, Peptech Limited, AAV Limited, Hpal Limited, SDI Limited,
Gribbles Group Limited (The), ERG Limited, Schaffer Corporation Limited, Nylex Limited, Silex Systems Limited, Volante
Group Limited, Technology One Limited, SAI Global Limited, Henry Walker Eltin Group Limited, Cellestis Limited, Villa World
Limited, Boom Logistics Limited, Sirtex Medical Limited, Vision Systems Limited, Collection House Limited, Maxitrans
Industries Limited, Keycorp Limited, Symex Holdings Limited, Virotec International Limited, SMS Management & Technology
Limited, UXC Limited, Norwood Abbey Limited, Institute Of Drug Technology Australia Limited, Macmahon Holdings
Limited, Tempo Services Limited, Agenix Limited, Unitract Limited, Genetic Technologies Limited, Atlas Group Holdings
Limited, Circadian Technologies Limited, Peppercorn Investment Fund, , Primelife Corporation Limited, Kresta Holdings
Limited, Coffey International Limited, Orbital Engine Corporation Limited, Citect Corporation Limited and Multimedia
Limited.
If any of the companies in the comparator group ceases to exist in its current form for any reason other than its liquidation,
or if the Board determines in its discretion that a company should no longer be in the comparator group because of an
anomaly, distortion or other event that is not directly related to the financial performance of that company, that company
will cease to form part of the comparator group.
Options will not become exercisable unless Mortgage Choice’s TSR is above the 50th percentile of the comparator group at
the end of the performance period. Above the 50th percentile, options will vest and become exercisable in accordance with
a vesting scale.
The vesting scale is as follows:
Company Performance (TSR Percentile Ranking)
Percentage of offered Options allocated
At or below the 50th percentile
At the 51st percentile
75th percentile or above
0%
52%
100%
Between the 51st percentile and 75th percentiles, an additional 2.0% of options will vest for every percentile increase in TSR
ranking.
The rules of the EPOP permit the Company to issue new shares or to purchase shares on-market for the purposes of
satisfying the exercise of options.
25
Directors’ report continued
Any options which do not become exercisable following the application of the performance condition and vesting scale will
lapse. An option that has become exercisable but is not exercised will lapse on the earlier of:
■ 10 years after the date of offer;
■ three months, or such other period determined by the Board, after the participant ceases employment for a reason
other than a ‘qualifying reason’ (i.e. death, total and permanent disability, redundancy, or any other reason determined
by the Board); and
■ 12 months, or such other period determined by the Board, after the participant ceases employment for a ‘qualifying
reason’.
Where a participant ceases to be employed by the Company other than because of a ‘qualifying reason’, any options that
have not become exercisable will lapse. However, if there is cessation of employment due to a ‘qualifying reason’, the Board
may determine that some or all of the options may vest. In the event of a change of control of the Company, all options
will vest.
If the Board determines that a participant has acted fraudulently or dishonestly, has committed an act of harassment or
discrimination, is in serious breach of any duty to Mortgage Choice, or, in the Board’s reasonable opinion, has brought
Mortgage Choice into serious disrepute, any options held by the participant will lapse.
The terms and conditions of each grant of options affecting remuneration are as follows:
Grant Date
Expiry Date
Exercise Price
10 August 2004
10 August 2014
24 February 2005
24 February 2015
2 September 2005 2 September 2015
$1.05
$1.08
$1.43
Value per option at
grant date
Date exercisable
$0.32 From 11 August 2007 to 10 August 2014
$0.32 From 25 February 2008 to 24 February 2015
$0.28 From 2 September 2008 to 2 September 2015
Details of options over ordinary shares in the Company provided as remuneration to each Director and key management
personnel of Mortgage Choice Limited are set out below. When exercisable, each option is convertible into one ordinary
share of Mortgage Choice Limited. Further information on the options is set out in note 32 to the financial statements.
Name
Directors of Mortgage Choice Limited
P A Lahiff
Other key management personnel
A D Crossley
A J Fraser
M C Newton
D S Bayes*
Number of options
granted during the year
Number of options
vested during the year
2006
2005
2006
2005
424,100
323,200
128,600
81,800
71,400
-
108,900
92,200
-
126,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
* Entitlement to options has been forfeited as part of termination of employment.
The assessed fair value at grant date of options granted to individuals is allocated equally over the period from grant date
to vesting date, and the amount is included in the remuneration tables above. Fair values at grant date are independently
determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model utilising a Black-Scholes option pricing model framework that takes into
account the exercise price, the term of the option, the vesting and performance criteria, the impact of dilution, the
non-tradeable nature of the option, the share price at grant date and expected price volatility of the underlying share, the
expected dividend yield and the risk-free interest rate for the term of the option.
The model inputs for options granted during the year ended 30 June 2006 included:
(a)
options are granted for no consideration, each tranche vests and is exercisable after three anniversaries of the date of
grant;
(b) exercise price: $1.43;
(c) grant date: 2 September 2005;
(d) expiry date: 2 September 2015;
(e) share price at grant date: $1.43;
(f) expected price volatility of the company’s shares: 30.0%;
(g) expected dividend yield: 6.0%; and
(h)
risk-free interest rate: 5.0%.
26
Shares provided on exercise of remuneration options
No shares were issued as a result of the exercise of remuneration options during the year ended 30 June 2006 (2005 – nil).
Performance Share Plan (PSP)
The PSP permits eligible senior managers identified by the Board to be offered conditional entitlements to shares. The
shares allocated to those employees are subject to the achievement of performance requirements specified by the Board.
The PSP is designed to provide the long-term incentive component of remuneration for senior managers, in line with the
Company’s overall reward strategy, which aims to attract, motivate and retain high-performing managers.
Participation in the PSP is offered on an annual basis. Eligible senior managers are offered shares to a value determined by
reference to the Company’s reward policy and market practice with regard to long-term incentive arrangements provided
by peer organisations. The actual number of shares allocated to participants depends on Mortgage Choice’s performance
against the performance criteria. Any conditional entitlements that participants do not become entitled to at the end of the
performance period (i.e. as the performance condition has not been met in full), will lapse.
The performance requirements and vesting scale applicable to the offers under the PSP during the year ended 30 June
2006 are identical to those specified for the initial offer under the Executive Performance Option Plan.
The rules of the PSP permit the Company to issue new shares or to purchase shares on-market if the performance
requirements are satisfied at the end of the three-year performance period. Participants will not be required to pay for any
shares that may be allocated to them under the PSP. Until the shares are released from the PSP, they will remain subject to
the PSP rules and to the ‘holding lock’ applied pursuant to those rules, and the participant will be restricted in his or her
ability to deal in those shares.
Shares will not be released from the PSP and will remain subject to a holding lock until a Notice of Withdrawal, that has
been approved by the Board, is lodged with the Plan Administrator in respect of them. Once a Notice of Withdrawal is
accepted, the Plan Administrator will release the holding lock in respect of the shares which are the subject of that Notice.
A Notice of Withdrawal may be lodged by a participant following the earlier of:
■ 1 July in the year (being a period commencing 1 July and ending 30 June) that is 10 years after the year in which the
offer is made and is accepted by the participant;
■ the participant ceasing to be an employee of the Company;
■ a ‘capital event’ (generally, a successful takeover offer or scheme of arrangement relating to the Company) occurring; or
■ the date upon which the Board gives its written consent to the lodgement of a Notice of Withdrawal by the participant.
While shares remain subject to the PSP rules, participants will, in general, enjoy the rights attaching to those shares (such as
voting or dividend rights etc). These rights are not available to participants prior to the performance requirements being
met.
Where a participant ceases to be employed by Mortgage Choice prior to the end of the performance period, other than
because of a ‘qualifying reason’ (i.e. death, total and permanent disability, redundancy, and any other reason determined
by the Board), any conditional entitlements to receive shares will lapse. However, in the event of a change in control of the
Company or if there is cessation of employment due to a ‘qualifying reason’, the Board may determine that some or all of
the shares may be allocated to the participant.
If the Board determines that a participant has acted fraudulently or dishonestly, has committed an act of harassment or
discrimination, is in serious breach of any duty to Mortgage Choice, or, in the Board’s reasonable opinion, has brought
Mortgage Choice into serious disrepute, any shares to which the participant may have become entitled at the end of the
performance period, and any shares held by the participant under the PSP are forfeited by the participant.
The terms and conditions of each offer of performance shares affecting remuneration in this or future reporting periods are as
follows:
Offer Date
10 August 2004
6 September 2004
4 January 2005
24 February 2005
2 September 2005
Value per performance share at offer date
Vesting Date
$1.05
$1.05
$0.91
$1.08
$1.43
10 August 2007
6 September 2007
4 January 2008
24 February 2008
2 September 2008
Details of performance shares in the Company provided as remuneration to each Director and key management personnel
of Mortgage Choice Limited are set out below. Further information on the options is set out in note 32 to the financial
statements.
27
Directors’ report continued
Name
Directors of Mortgage Choice Limited
P A Lahiff
Other key management personnel
A D Crossley
A J Fraser
M C Newton
D M Hoskins
W J O’Rourke
M N Writer
D S Bayes*
I C Pepper*
P V Borg*
Number of performance
shares rights granted
during the year
Number of performance
shares issued
during the year
2006
2005
2006
2005
83,300
97,000
25,300
14,000
21,400
26,200
23,800
14,200
-
23,600
-
24,500
24,700
27,600
33,900
30,800
-
37,807
30,500
31,200
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
* Entitlement to shares has been forfeited as part of termination of employment.
The assessed fair value at grant date of share rights granted to individuals is allocated equally over the period from grant
date to vesting date, and the amount is included in the remuneration tables above. Fair values at grant date are
independently determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model utilising a Black-Scholes option pricing model framework
that takes into account the term of the rights, the vesting and performance criteria, the impact of dilution, the
non-tradeable nature of the rights, the share price at grant date and expected price volatility of the underlying share, the
expected dividend yield and the risk-free interest rate for the term of the share rights.
The model inputs for performance shares granted during the year ended 30 June 2006 included:
(a)
share rights are granted for no consideration, each tranche vests and is exercisable after three anniversaries of the date
of grant;
(b) grant date: 2 September 2005;
(c) expiry date: 2 September 2015;
(d) share price at grant date: $1.43;
(e) expected price volatility of the company’s shares: 30%;
(f) expected dividend yield: 6%; and
(g)
risk-free interest rate: 5%.
Shares provided on vesting of performance share entitlements
No shares were issued as a result of the vesting of performance share entitlements during the year ended 30 June 2006
(2005 – nil).
E Additional information – unaudited
Principles used to determine the nature and amount of remuneration: relationship between remuneration and
company performance
The overall level of executive reward takes into account the performance of the Group over a number of years, with greater
emphasis given to the current year.
Details of remuneration: cash bonuses, share rights and options
For each cash bonus and grant of share rights and options in the tables on pages 23-24 and 26-28, the percentage of the
available grant that was paid, or that vested, in the financial year, and the percentage that was forfeited because the
person did not meet the service and performance criteria is set out below. The share rights and options vest over three
years, providing vesting conditions are met. No share rights or options will vest if the conditions are not satisfied, hence the
minimum value of the share rights and options yet to vest is nil. The maximum value of the share rights and options yet to
vest has been determined assuming the share price on the date the share rights and options are exercised will not exceed
$4.06 for the share rights and options issued in 10 August 2004, $4.36 for those issued on 4 January 2005, $4.41 for
those issued on 24 February 2005 and $4.73 for those issued on 2 September 2005.
28
Cash bonus
Share rights and options
Name
P A Lahiff
A D Crossley
A J Fraser
M C Newton
D M Hoskins
W J O’Rourke
M N Writer
D S Bayes
I C Pepper
P V Borg
E M Macgregor
Paid
%
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
-
100
Forfeited
%
Year
granted
Vested
%
Forfeited
%
Financial years
in which rights
and options
may vest
Minimum total
value of grant
yet to vest
$
Maximum total
value of grant
yet to vest
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
100
-
2005
2006
2005
2006
2005
2006
2005
2006
2005
2006
2005
2006
2005
2006
2005
2005
2006
2005
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
100
100
100
100
-
2008
2009
2008
2009
2008
2009
2008
2009
2008
2009
2008
2009
2008
2009
2008
2008
2009
2008
-
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
-
1,366,652
1,793,539
380,439
544,049
107,692
301,840
389,578
460,592
137,634
123,926
125,048
112,574
-
67,166
-
-
-
-
-
Share based compensation: Options
Further details relating to options are set out below.
Name
P A Lahiff
A D Crossley
A J Fraser
M C Newton
A
Remuneration
consisting of
options
B
Value at grant
date
$
C
Value at
exercise date
$
D
Value at lapse
date
$
E
Total of
columns B-D
$
5.2%
4.2%
1.7%
3.5%
118,748
36,008
19,992
30,492
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
118,748
36,008
19,992
30,492
Share based compensation: Performance shares
Further details relating to performance shares are set out below.
Name
P A Lahiff
A D Crossley
A J Fraser
M C Newton
D M Hoskins
W J O’Rourke
M N Writer
A
Remuneration
consisting of
performance
shares
B
Value at offer
date
$
C
Value at
entitlement
date
$
D
Value at lapse
date
$
E
Total of
columns B-D
$
4.5%
3.7%
3.4%
3.1%
4.4%
4.7%
2.8%
118,761
36,070
19,960
30,510
37,353
33,932
20,245
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
118,761
36,070
19,960
30,510
37,353
33,932
20,245
A = The percentage of the value of remuneration consisting of options or performance shares, based on the value at grant
date set out in column B.
B = The value at grant date calculated in accordance with AASB 2 Share-based Payment of options granted during the year
as part of remuneration.
C = The value at exercise date of options that were granted as part of remuneration and were exercised during the year.
D = The value at lapse date of options that were granted as part of remuneration and that lapsed during the year.
29
Directors’ report continued
Share options and performance shares granted to directors and the most highly remunerated officers
Options and performance share rights over unissued ordinary shares of Mortgage Choice Limited granted during or since the end
of the financial year to the five most highly remunerated officers of the Company as part of their remuneration were as follows:
Options
Performance Shares
Number
Date Granted
Number
Date Offered
Director
P A Lahiff – Managing Director
424,100
2 September 2005
83,300
2 September 2005
Other Executives
A D Crossley – Chief Operating Officer
128,600
2 September 2005
25,300
2 September 2005
A J Fraser – Chief Financial Officer
71,400
2 September 2005
14,000
2 September 2005
M C Newton – Chief Information Officer
108,900
2 September 2005
21,400
2 September 2005
D M Hoskins – Company Secretary
W J O’Rourke – National Manager Corporate Affairs
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
26,200
2 September 2005
23,800
2 September 2005
The options were granted under the Executive Performance Option Plan and the performance shares were offered under
the Performance Share Plan. Details of the options and performance shares granted to Directors and the five most highly
remunerated officers of the Group can be found in section D of the remuneration report on page 25-28. No options or
performance shares have been granted since the end of the year.
Shares under option
Unissued ordinary shares of Mortgage Choice Limited under option at the date of this report are as follows:
Date options granted
Expiry date
Issue price of shares
Number under option
10 August 2004
9 August 2014
24 February 2005
23 February 2015
2 September 2005
1 September 2015
$1.05
$1.08
$1.43
415,400
81,800
733,000
1,230,200
No option holder has any right under the options to participate in any other share issue of the Company or any other
entity.
14. I NSUR A NCE O F O FFI CER S
Insurance premiums were paid for the year ended 30 June 2006 in respect of Directors and Officers liability and legal expenses
for Directors and Officers of the Company and all controlled entities. The insurance contract prohibits disclosure of the premium
paid. The insurance premiums relate to:
■ costs and expenses incurred by relevant Directors and officers in defending any proceedings; and
■ other liabilities that may arise from their position, with the exception of conduct involving dishonesty, wrongful acts, or
improper use of information or position to gain personal advantage.
Since the end of the previous financial year, the Company has not indemnified or made a relevant agreement for indemnifying
against a liability any person who is or has been an officer or auditor of the Company.
15. PROCEEDI NGS O N BEH A L F O F T HE COMPA N Y
No person has applied to the Court under section 237 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) for leave to bring proceedings on
behalf of the Company, or to intervene in any proceedings to which the Company is a party, for the purpose of taking
responsibility on behalf of the Company for all or part of those proceedings.
No proceedings have been brought or intervened in on behalf of the Company with leave of the Court under section 237 of the
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
30
16. N O N -AU DI T SERV I CES
The Company may decide to employ the auditor on assignments additional to their statutory audit duties where the auditor’s
expertise and experience with the Company and/or the consolidated entity are important.
Details of the amounts paid or payable to the auditor (PricewaterhouseCoopers) for audit and non-audit services provided during
the year are set out below.
The Board of Directors has considered the position and, in accordance with the advice received from the audit committee, is
satisfied that the provision of the non-audit services is compatible with the general standard of independence for auditors
imposed by the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth). The Directors are satisfied that the provision of non-audit services by the auditor, as
set out below, did not compromise the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) as none of the
services undermine the general principles relating to auditor independence as set out in Professional Statement F1, including
reviewing or auditing the auditor’s own work, acting in a management or a decision-making capacity for the Company, acting as
advocate for the Company or jointly sharing economic risk and rewards.
During the year the following fees were paid or payable for services provided by the auditor of the parent entity, its related
practices and non-related audit firms:
Assurance services
1. Audit services
PricewaterhouseCoopers Australian firm:
Audit and review of financial reports and other audit work
under the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
Total remuneration for audit services
2.
Other assurance services
PricewaterhouseCoopers Australian firm:
Due diligence services
Other assurance services
Total remuneration for other assurance services
Total remuneration for assurance services
Taxation services
PricewaterhouseCoopers Australian firm:
Tax compliance services, including review of company income tax returns
Other tax services
Total remuneration for taxation services
Advisory services
PricewaterhouseCoopers Australian firm:
Initial Public Offering Services
Total remuneration for advisory services
Consolidated
2006
$
2005
$
228,350
228,350
122,000
122,000
–
7,000
7,000
235,350
40,401
16,000
56,401
178,401
18,800
15,283
34,083
110,330
10,475
120,805
–
–
115,380
115,380
31
Directors’ report continued
17. AU DI TOR S’ I N DEPEN DENCE DECL A R AT I O N
A copy of the auditors’ independence declaration as required under section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) is set out on
page 33.
18. ROU N DI NG O F A MOU N T S
The Company is of a kind referred to in Class Order 98/0100 issued by the Australian Securities & Investments Commission,
relating to the “rounding off” of amounts in the Directors’ report. Amounts in the Directors’ report have been rounded off in
accordance with that Class Order to the nearest thousand dollars, or in certain cases, to the nearest dollar.
19. AU DI TOR
PricewaterhouseCoopers continues in office in accordance with section 327 of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
This report is made in accordance with a resolution of the directors.
Peter Ritchie
Director
Sydney
23 August 2006
32
33
I N C O M E S T A T E M E N T S
For the year ended 30 June 2006
Revenue from continuing operations
Other income
Expenses from continuing operations
Sales
Technology
Marketing
Finance
Corporate
Finance costs
Profit before income tax
Income tax expense
Net profit attributable to the members of
Mortgage Choice Limited
Earnings per share for profit from continuing
operations attributable to the ordinary equity
holders of the Company
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
Consolidated
Parent entity
Notes
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
141,070
108,788
141,070
108,788
982
1,713
982
1,713
5
6
7
(89,445)
(73,831)
(89,445)
(73,831)
(3,802)
(3,824)
(3,802)
(6,813)
(7,648)
(6,813)
(1,677)
(1,836)
(1,677)
(3,824)
(7,648)
(1,836)
(5,145)
(5,220)
(5,145)
(5,220)
(9,320)
(2)
(9,320)
25,850
18,140
25,850
8
(7,990)
(5,610)
(7,990)
(2)
18,140
(5,610)
17,860
12,530
17,860
12,530
Cents
Cents
31
31
15.2
15.0
10.7
10.7
The above income statements should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
34
B A L A N C E S H E E T S
As at 30 June 2006
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Total current assets
Non-current assets
Receivables
Property, plant and equipment
Deferred tax assets
Intangible assets
Total non-current assets
Total assets
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables
Current tax liabilities
Provisions
Total current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Payables
Deferred tax liabilities
Provisions
Total non-current liabilities
Total liabilities
Net assets
EQUITY
Contributed equity
Reserves
Retained profits
Total equity
Consolidated
Parent entity
Notes
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
9
10
11
12
13
14
8,393
11,462
8,393
11,462
52,677
61,070
9,793
52,677
9,793
21,255
61,070
21,255
101,823
–
101,823
1,192
1,197
2,075
1,462
1,206
1,472
1,192
1,197
2,075
106,287
4,140
106,287
–
1,462
1,206
1,472
4,140
167,357
25,395
167,357
25,395
15
36,265
11,585
36,265
11,585
16
17
18
19
2,368
517
3,121
530
2,368
517
3,121
530
39,150
15,236
39,150
15,236
64,210
16,357
185
80,752
232
64,210
-
16,357
144
376
185
80,752
232
-
144
376
119,902
15,612
119,902
15,612
47,455
9,783
47,455
9,783
20
21(a)
21(b)
203
343
46,909
47,455
203
91
9,489
9,783
203
343
46,909
47,455
203
91
9,489
9,783
The above balance sheets should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
35
S T A T E M E N T S O F C H A N G E S I N E Q U I T Y
For the year ended 30 June 2006
Consolidated
Parent entity
Notes
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
Total equity at the beginning of the financial year
9,783
6,862
9,783
6,862
Adjustment on adoption of AASB 132 and AASB 139, net of tax, to:
Retained profits
33
34,847
-
34,847
-
Restated total equity at the beginning of the financial year
44,630
6,862
44,630
6,862
Profit for the year
17,860
12,530
17,860
12,530
Transactions with equity holders in their capacity as equity holders:
Increase in share capital – deferred tax on capital raising costs
Employee share rights and options
Capital reduction
Contributions of equity, net of transaction costs
Dividends provided for or paid
33
32
20
20
22
-
252
-
-
122
91
(8,962)
7,530
-
252
-
-
122
91
(8,962)
7,530
(15,287)
(8,390)
(15,287)
(8,390)
(15,035)
(9,609)
(15,035)
(9,609)
Total equity at the end of the financial year
47,455
9,783
47,455
9,783
The above statements of changes in equity should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
36
C A S H F L O W S T A T E M E N T S
For the year ended 30 June 2006
Cash flows from operating activities
Receipts from customers (inclusive of goods and services tax)
Payments to suppliers and employees (inclusive of goods and
services tax)
Interest received from trailing commissions
Interest paid on trailing commissions
Interest paid
Income taxes paid
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from operating activities
Cash flows from investing activities
Payments for plant and equipment
Proceeds from sale of plant and equipment
Payments for software and development costs
Interest received from cash and deposits at call
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from sale of shares
Payment for capital reduction
Dividends paid
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from financing activities
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the financial year
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of year
Consolidated
Parent entity
Notes
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
120,894
119,621
120,894
119,621
(106,729)
14,165
15,216
(9,320)
-
(7,311)
12,750
(102,080)
17,541
-
-
(2)
(3,744)
13,795
(106,729)
14,165
15,216
(9,320)
-
(7,311)
12,750
(102,080)
17,541
-
-
(2)
(3,744)
13,795
(332)
2
(883)
681
(532)
-
-
(15,287)
(15,287)
(3,069)
11,462
8,393
(830)
12
(1,065)
588
(1,295)
7,531
(8,962)
(10,806)
(12,237)
263
11,199
11,462
(332)
2
(883)
681
(532)
-
-
(15,287)
(15,287)
(3,069)
11,462
8,393
(830)
12
(1,065)
588
(1,295)
7,531
(8,962)
(10,806)
(12,237)
263
11,199
11,462
30
9
The above cash flow statements should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
37
N O T E S T O T H E F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
N OT E 1 SU MM A RY O F SIGN I FI CA N T ACCOU N T I NG P O L I CI ES
The principal accounting policies adopted in the preparation of the financial report are set out below. These policies have been
consistently applied to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated. The financial report includes separate financial statements
for Mortgage Choice Limited as an individual entity and the consolidated entity consisting of Mortgage Choice Limited and its
subsidiaries.
(a) Basis of preparation
This general purpose financial report has been prepared in accordance with Australian equivalents to International Financial
Reporting Standards (AIFRSs), other authoritative pronouncements of the Australian Accounting Standards Board, Urgent
Issues Group Interpretations and the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
Compliance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)
Australian Accounting Standards include AIFRS. Compliance with AIFRS ensures that the financial statements and notes of
both the consolidated group and parent entity of Mortgage Choice Limited comply with IFRS except that it has elected to
apply the relief provided in respect of certain disclosure requirements contained in AASB 132 Financial Instruments:
Presentation and Disclosure.
Application of AASB 1 First-time Adoption of Australian Equivalents to International Financial Reporting
Standards
These financial statements are the first Mortgage Choice Limited financial statements to be prepared in accordance with
AIFRS. AASB 1 First-time Adoption of Australian Equivalents to International Financial Reporting Standards has been applied
in preparing these financial statements.
Financial statements of Mortgage Choice Limited until 30 June 2005 had been prepared in accordance with previous
Australian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (AGAAP). AGAAP differs in certain respects from AIFRS. When
preparing Mortgage Choice Limited’s 2006 financial statements, management has amended certain accounting, valuation
and consolidation methods applied in the AGAAP financial statements to comply with AIFRS. With the exception of
financial instruments, the comparative figures in respect of 2005 were restated to reflect these adjustments. The Group has
taken the exemption available under AASB 1 to only apply AASB 132 and AASB 139 Financial Instruments; Recognition and
Measurement from 1 July 2005.
Reconciliations and descriptions of the effect of transition from previous AGAAP to AIFRS on the Group’s equity and its net
income are given in note 33.
Historical cost convention
These financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, as modified by the revaluation of
available for sale financial assets, financial assets and liabilities (including derivative instruments) at fair value through profit
and loss, certain classes of property, plant and equipment and investment property.
Critical accounting estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with AIFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It
also requires management to exercise its judgement in the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies. The areas
involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the
financial statements, are disclosed in note 3.
(b) Principles of consolidation
Subsidiaries
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the assets and liabilities of all subsidiaries of Mortgage Choice Limited
(‘’company’’ or ‘’parent entity’’) as at 30 June 2006 and the results of all subsidiaries for the year then ended. Mortgage
Choice Limited and its subsidiaries together are referred to in this financial report as the Group or the consolidated entity.
Subsidiaries are all those entities (including special purpose entities) over which the Group has the power to govern the
financial and operating policies, generally accompanying a shareholding of more than one-half of the voting rights. The
existence and effect of potential voting rights that are currently exercisable or convertible are considered when assessing
whether the Group controls another entity.
38
Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the Group. They are de-consolidated
from the date that control ceases.
The purchase method of accounting is used to account for the acquisition of subsidiaries by the Group (refer to note 1(g)).
Intercompany transactions, balances and unrealised gains on transactions between Group companies are eliminated.
Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless the transaction provides evidence of the impairment of the asset transferred.
Accounting policies of subsidiaries have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the policies adopted by
the Group.
Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for at cost in the individual financial statements of Mortgage Choice Limited.
(c) Segment reporting
A business segment is a group of assets and operations engaged in providing products or services that are subject to risks
and returns that are different to those of other business segments. A geographical segment is engaged in providing
products or services within a particular economic environment and is subject to risks and returns that are different from
those of segments operating in other economic environments.
(d) Revenue recognition
The consolidated entity provides loan origination services and receives origination commission on the settlement of a home
loan. Additionally the lender will normally pay a trailing commission over the life of the loan. Revenue over the estimated
life of loans written is recognised on the settlement of the loans. The consolidated entity also earns income from the sale of
Franchises and Franchise services.
Revenue from sale of services is recognised as follows:
(i) Origination commissions
Origination commissions are recognised as revenue on loan settlement.
(ii) Trailing commissions
The Company receives trailing commissions from lenders on loans they have settled that were originated by the Group
and its Franchisees. The trailing commissions are received over the life of the loans based on loan book balance
outstanding. The Company also makes trailing commission payments to Franchisees based on the loan book balance
outstanding.
On initial recognition, trailing commission revenue and receivables are recognised at fair value, being the expected
future trailing commission receivables discounted to their net present value. In addition, an associated payable and
expense to the Franchisees are also recognised, initially measured at fair value being the future trailing commission
payable to Franchisees discounted to their net present value.
Subsequent to initial recognition and measurement, both the trailing commission asset and trailing commission
payable are measured at amortised cost. The carrying amount of the trail commission asset and trailing commission
payable are adjusted to reflect actual and revised estimated cash flows by recalculating the carrying amount through
computing the present value of estimated future cash flows at the original effective interest rate. The resulting
adjustment is recognised as income or expense in the profit and loss account.
(iii) Franchise fee income
Franchise fee income is derived from the sale of franchises by the consolidated entity and comprises licence fees and
contributions for training and franchise consumables. Licence fees are partially repayable should Franchisees terminate
their Franchise agreement in accordance with a repayment schedule as defined in the agreement. Licence fee income
is recognised over a four year period in accordance with this schedule. Contributions for training and consumables are
recognised as revenue on receipt. Licence fees which remain repayable to Franchisees at balance sheet date are
included in liabilities.
(iv)
Interest income
Interest income is recognised on a time proportion basis using the effective interest method, see note 1(k). When a
receivable is impaired, the Group reduces the carrying amount to its recoverable amount, being the estimated future
cash flow discounted at the original effective interest rate of the instrument, and continues unwinding the discount as
interest income.
(v) Other income
Other income includes contributions from lenders towards conferences and workshops together with other
non-operating revenues. These are recognised as income in the year the conference or workshop is held.
39
Mortgage Choice Limited
Notes to the financial statements continued
30 June 2006
(e)
Income tax
The income tax expense or revenue for the period is the tax payable on the current period’s taxable income based on the
income tax rate adjusted by changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities attributable to temporary differences between the
tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the financial statements.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognised for temporary differences at the tax rates expected to apply when the
assets are recovered or liabilities are settled. The relevant tax rates are applied to the cumulative amounts of deductible and
taxable temporary differences to measure the deferred tax asset or liability. An exception is made for certain temporary
differences arising from the initial recognition of an asset or a liability. No deferred tax asset or liability is recognised in
relation to these temporary differences if they arose in a transaction that at the time of the transaction did not affect either
accounting profit or taxable profit or loss.
Deferred tax assets are recognised for deductible temporary differences only if it is probable that future taxable amounts
will be available to utilise those temporary differences and losses.
Deferred tax liabilities and assets are not recognised for temporary differences between the carrying amount and tax bases
of investments in controlled entities where the parent entity is able to control the timing of the reversal of the temporary
differences and it is probable that the differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets and
liabilities and when the deferred tax balances relate to the same taxation authority. Current tax assets and tax liabilities are
offset where the entity has a legally enforceable right to offset and intends either to settle on a net basis, or to realise the
asset and settle the liability simultaneously.
Current and deferred tax balances attributable to amounts recognised directly in equity are also recognised directly in
equity.
Tax consolidation legislation
Mortgage Choice Limited and its wholly-owned Australian controlled entities are members of a consolidated group for
income tax purposes.
The head entity, Mortgage Choice Limited, and the controlled entities in the tax consolidated group continue to account for
their own current and deferred tax amounts. These tax amounts are measured as if each entity in the tax consolidated
group continues to be a stand alone taxpayer in its own right.
In addition to its own current and deferred tax amounts, Mortgage Choice Limited also recognises the current tax liabilities
(or assets) and the deferred tax assets arising from unused tax losses and unused tax credits assumed from controlled
entities in the tax consolidated group.
Any difference between the amounts assumed and amounts receivable or payable under the tax funding agreement are
recognised as a contribution to (or distribution from) wholly-owned tax consolidated entities.
(f) Leases
Leases of property, plant and equipment where the Group has substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership are
classified as finance leases. Finance leases are capitalised at the lease’s inception at the lower of the fair value of the leased
property and the present value of the minimum lease payments. The corresponding rental obligations, net of finance
charges, are included in other long term payables. Each lease payment is allocated between the liability and finance charges
so as to achieve a constant rate on the finance balance outstanding. The interest element of the finance cost is charged to
the income statement over the lease period so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the remaining balance
of the liability for each period. The property, plant and equipment acquired under finance leases is depreciated over the
shorter of the asset’s useful life and the lease term.
Leases in which a significant portion of the risks and rewards of ownership are retained by the lessor are classified as
operating leases. Payments made under operating leases (net of any incentives received from the lessor) are charged to the
income statement on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease.
40
(g) Business combinations
The purchase method of accounting is used to account for all business combinations, including business combinations
involving entities or businesses under common control, regardless of whether equity instruments or other assets are
acquired. Cost is measured as the fair value of the assets given, shares issued or liabilities incurred or assumed at the date
of exchange plus costs directly attributable to the acquisition. Where equity instruments are issued in an acquisition, the
fair value of the instruments is their published market price as at the date of exchange unless, in rare circumstances, it can
be demonstrated that the published price at the date of exchange is an unreliable indicator of fair value and that other
evidence and valuation methods provide a more reliable measure of fair value. Transaction costs arising on the issue of
equity instruments are recognised directly in equity.
Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured initially
at their fair values at the acquisition date, irrespective of the extent of any minority interest. The excess of the cost of
acquisition over the fair value of the Group’s share of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill. If the cost
of acquisition is less than the Group’s share of the fair value of the identifiable net assets of the subsidiary acquired, the
difference is recognised directly in the income statement, but only after a reassessment of the identification and
measurement of the net assets acquired.
(h)
Impairment of assets
Assets subject to depreciation and amortisation are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognised for the amount by which the
asset’s carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of an asset’s fair value less
costs to sell and value in use. For the purposes of assessing impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which
there are separately identifiable cash inflows which are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets or groups
of assets (cash-generating units). Non-financial assets that suffered an impairment are reviewed for possible reversal of the
impairment at each reporting date.
(i) Cash and cash equivalents
For cash flow statement presentation purposes, cash and cash equivalents includes cash on hand, deposits held at call with
financial institutions, other short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less that are
readily convertible to known amounts of cash and which are subject to an insignificant risk of changes in value.
(j) Trade receivables
Trade receivables are recognised in accordance with the revenue recognition policy outlined in note 1(d).
Collectability of trade receivables is reviewed on an ongoing basis. Debts which are known to be uncollectable are written
off. A provision for doubtful receivables is established when there is objective evidence that the Group will not be able to
collect all amounts due according to the original terms of receivables. The amount of the provision is the difference
between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted at the effective
interest rate. The amount of the provision is recognised in the income statement.
41
Mortgage Choice Limited
Notes to the financial statements continued
30 June 2006
(k)
Investments and other financial assets
From 1 July 2004 to 30 June 2005
The Group has taken the exemption available under AASB 1 to apply AASB 132 and AASB 139 only from 1 July 2005. The
Group has applied previous AGAAP to the comparative information on financial instruments within the scope of AASB 132
and AASB 139.
Adjustments on transition date: 1 July 2005
The nature of the main adjustments to make this information comply with AASB 132 and AASB 139 are that, with the
exception of held-to-maturity investments and loans and receivables which are measured at amortised cost (refer below),
fair value is the measurement basis. Fair value is inclusive of transaction costs. Changes in fair value are either taken to the
income statement or an equity reserve (refer below). At the date of transition (1 July 2005) changes to carrying amounts
are taken to retained earnings or reserves.
From 1 July 2005
The Group classifies its investments in the following categories: financial assets at fair value through profit or loss, loans
and receivables, held-to-maturity investments, and available-for-sale financial assets. The classification depends on the
purpose for which the investments were acquired. Management determines the classification of its investments at initial
recognition and, in the case of assets classified as held to maturity, re-evaluates this designation at each reporting date.
Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables are non derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not quoted in an
active market. They arise when the Group provides money, goods or services directly to a debtor with no intention of
selling the receivable. They are included in current assets, except for those with maturities greater than 12 months after the
balance sheet date which are classified as non-current assets. Loans and receivables are included in receivables in the
balance sheet (notes 10 and 11).
(l) Property, plant and equipment
All property, plant and equipment is stated at historical cost less depreciation. Historical cost includes expenditure that is
directly attributable to the acquisition of the items.
Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount or recognised as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when
it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Group and the cost of the item can be
measured reliably. All other repairs and maintenance are charged to the income statement during the financial period in
which they are incurred.
Depreciation on other assets is calculated using the straight line method to allocate their cost or revalued amounts, net of
their residual values, over their estimated useful lives, as follows:
Office equipment
5-10 years
Computer equipment 3-4 years
Furniture and fittings
10-15 years
The assets’ residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each balance sheet date.
An asset’s carrying amount is written down immediately to its recoverable amount if the asset’s carrying amount is greater
than its estimated recoverable amount (note 1(h)).
Gains and losses on disposals are determined by comparing proceeds with carrying amount. These are included in the
income statement.
42
(m)
Intangible assets
Software
Acquired computer software licences are capitalised on the basis of the costs incurred to acquire and bring to use the
specific software. These costs are amortised over their estimated useful lives (three to five years).
Costs associated with developing or maintaining computer software programmes are recognised as an expense as incurred.
Costs that are directly associated with the production of identifiable and unique software products controlled by the
Group, and that will probably generate future economic benefits exceeding costs beyond one year, are recognised as
intangible assets.
Computer software development costs recognised as assets are amortised over their estimated useful lives (not exceeding
three years).
(n) Trade and other payables
These amounts represent liabilities for goods and services provided to the consolidated entity prior to the end of the
financial year and which are unpaid. The amounts are unsecured and are usually paid within 30 days of recognition.
(o) Borrowing costs
Borrowing costs are recognised as expenses.
(p) Provisions
Provisions are recognised when the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of past events; it is more
likely than not that an outflow of resources will be required to settle the obligation; and the amount has been reliably
estimated. Provisions are not recognised for future operating losses.
Where there are a number of similar obligations, the likelihood that an outflow will be required in settlement is determined
by considering the class of obligations as a whole. A provision is recognised even if the likelihood of an outflow with
respect to any one item included in the same class of obligations may be small.
Provisions are measured at the present value of management’s best estimate of the expenditure required to settle the
present obligation at the balance sheet date. The discount rate used to determine the present value reflects current market
assessments of the time value of money and the risks specific to the liability. The increase in the provision due to the
passage of time is recognised as interest expense.
43
Mortgage Choice Limited
Notes to the financial statements continued
30 June 2006
(q) Employee benefits
(i) Wages and salaries and annual leave
Liabilities for wages and salaries, including non-monetary benefits and annual leave expected to be settled within 12
months of the reporting date are recognised in other payables in respect of employees’ services up to the reporting
date and are measured at the amounts expected to be paid when the liabilities are settled.
(ii) Long service leave
The liability for long service leave is recognised in the provision for employee benefits and measured as the present
value of expected future payments to be made in respect of services provided by employees up to the reporting date
using the projected unit credit method. Consideration is given to expected future wage and salary levels, experience of
employee departures and periods of service. Expected future payments are discounted using market yields at the
reporting date on national government bonds with terms to maturity and currency that match, as closely as possible,
the estimated future cash outflows.
(iii) Retirement benefit obligations
Contributions to the defined contribution fund are recognised as an expense as they become payable. Prepaid
contributions are recognised as an asset to the extent that a cash refund or a reduction in the future payments is
available.
(iv) Share-based payments
Share-based compensation benefits are provided to employees via the Mortgage Choice Executive Performance
Option Plan and an employee share scheme. Further details are included in note 32 of the financial report.
Shares options granted before 7 November 2002 and/or vested before 1 January 2005
No expense is recognised in respect of these options. The shares are recognised when the options are exercised and
the proceeds received allocated to share capital.
Shares options and share rights granted after 7 November 2002 and vested after 1 January 2005
The fair value of options granted under the Mortgage Choice Executive Performance Option Plan and share rights
granted under the Mortgage Choice Performance Share Plan are recognised as an employee benefit expense with a
corresponding increase in equity. The fair value is measured at grant date and recognised over the period during which
the employees become unconditionally entitled to the options and share rights.
The fair value at grant date is independently determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model utilising a
Black-Scholes option pricing model framework that takes into account the exercise price, the term of the option, the
vesting and performance criteria, the impact of dilution, the non-tradeable nature of the option, the share price at
grant date and expected price volatility of the underlying share, the expected dividend yield and the risk-free interest
rate for the term of the option.
The fair value of the options and share rights granted excludes the impact of any non-market vesting conditions (for
example, profitability and sales growth targets). Non-market vesting conditions are included in assumptions about the
number of options and shares that are expected to become exercisable. At each balance sheet date, the entity revises
its estimate of the number of options and share that are expected to become exercisable. The employee benefit
expense recognised each period takes into account the most recent estimate.
Upon the exercise of options, the balance of the share-based payments reserve relating to those options is transferred
to share capital and the proceeds received, net of any directly attributable transaction costs, are credited to share
capital. Upon the issue of performance shares, the balance of the share-based payments reserve relating to those
options is transferred to share capital.
(v) Profit-sharing and bonus plans
The Group recognises a liability and an expense where contractually obliged or where there is a past practice that has
created a constructive obligation.
(vi) Termination benefits
Termination benefits are payable when employment is terminated before the normal retirement date, or when an
employee accepts voluntary redundancy in exchange for these benefits. The Group recognises termination benefits
when it is demonstrably committed to either terminating the employment of current employees according to a
detailed formal plan without possibility of withdrawal or providing termination benefits as a result of an offer made to
encourage voluntary redundancy. Benefits falling due more than 12 months after balance sheet date are discounted to
present value.
44
(r) Contributed equity
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares or options are
shown in equity as a deduction, net of tax, from the proceeds. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new
shares or options, or for the acquisition of a business, are included in the cost of the acquisition as part of the purchase
consideration.
If the entity reacquires its own equity instruments, eg as the result of a share buy-back, those instruments are deducted
from equity and the associated shares are cancelled. No gain or loss is recognised in the profit or loss and the consideration
paid including any directly attributable incremental costs (net of income taxes) is recognised directly in equity.
(s) Dividends
Provision is made for the amount of any dividend declared, determined or publicly recommended by the Directors on or
before the end of the financial year but not distributed at balance date.
(t) Earnings per share
(i) Basic earnings per share
Basic earnings per share is determined by dividing net profit after income tax attributable to members of the
Company, excluding any costs of servicing equity other than ordinary shares, by the weighted average number of
ordinary shares outstanding during the financial year, adjusted for bonus elements in ordinary shares issued during the
year.
(ii) Diluted earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share adjusts the figures used in the determination of basic earnings per share to take into
account the after income tax effect of interest and other financing costs associated with dilutive potential ordinary
shares and the weighted average number of shares assumed to have been issued for no consideration in relation to
dilutive potential ordinary shares.
(u) Financial instrument transaction costs
The Group has taken the exemption available under AASB 1 to apply AASB 132 and AASB 139 from 1 July 2005. The
Group has applied previous Australian GAAP (AGAAP) in the comparative information on financial instruments within the
scope of AASB 132 and AASB 139. Under previous AGAAP transaction costs were excluded from the amounts disclosed in
the financial statements. Under AIFRS such costs are included in the carrying amounts. At the date of transition to AASB
132 and AASB 139 the adjustment to carrying amounts for the Group was immaterial.
(v) Goods and Services Tax (GST)
Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the amount of associated GST, unless the GST incurred is not
recoverable from the taxation authority. In this case it is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset or as part
of the expense. Receivables and payables are stated inclusive of the amount of GST receivable or payable. The net amount
of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority is included with other receivables or payables in the balance
sheet.
Cash flows are presented on a gross basis. The GST components of cash flows arising from investing or financing activities
which are recoverable from, or payable to the taxation authority, are presented as operating cash flow.
(w) Rounding of amounts
The Company is of a kind referred to in Class Order 98/0100, issued by the Australian Securities & Investments
Commission, relating to the “rounding off” of amounts in the financial report. Amounts in the financial report have been
rounded off in accordance with that Class Order to the nearest thousand dollars, or in certain cases, to the nearest dollar.
45
Mortgage Choice Limited
Notes to the financial statements continued
30 June 2006
(x) New accounting standards and UIG interpretations
Certain new accounting standards and UIG interpretations have been published that are not mandatory for 30 June 2006
reporting periods. The Group’s assessment of the impact of these new standards and interpretations is set out below.
(i) UIG 4 Determining whether an Asset Contains a Lease
UIG 4 is applicable to annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2006. The Group has not elected to adopt UIG 4
early. It will apply UIG 4 in its 2007 financial statements and the UIG 4 transition provisions. The Group will therefore
apply UIG 4 on the basis of facts and circumstances that existed as of 1 July 2006. Implementation of UIG 4 is not
expected to change the accounting for any of the Group’s current arrangements.
(ii) AASB 2005-9 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards [AASB 4, AASB 1023, AASB 139 & AASB 132]
AASB 2005-9 is applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2006. The amendments relate
to the accounting for financial guarantee contracts. The Group has not elected to adopt the amendments early. It will
apply the revised standards in its 30 June 2007 financial statements. Implementation of these AASB 2005-9 is not
expected to have an impact on the 2007 financial statements
AASB 7 Financial Instruments: Disclosures and AASB 2005-10 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards [AASB 132,
AASB 101, AASB 114, AASB 117, AASB 133, AASB 139, AASB 1, AASB 4, AASB 1023 & AASB 1038]
AASB 7 and AASB 2005-10 are applicable to annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2007. The Group
has not adopted the standards early. Application of the standards will not affect any of the amounts recognised in the
financial statements, but will impact the type of information disclosed in relation to the Group’s financial instruments.
N OT E 2 FI N A NCI A L RISK M A N AGEMEN T
The Group has limited exposure to financial risks. The Group does not use derivative financial instruments such as foreign
exchange contracts and interest rate swaps to hedge certain risk exposures. It does not operate internationally and is not exposed
to either securities price risk or commodity price risk.
The Group’s policies in relation to financial risks to which it has exposure are detailed below.
(a) Credit risk
Credit risk is limited to high credit quality financial institutions who are the members of the lender panel. The Group bears
the risk of non-payment of future trailing commissions by lenders should they not maintain solvency (correspondingly,
Mortgage Choice would not have to pay out any future trailing commissions to Franchisees in relation to such loans). In
light of this, new panel entrants are subject to commercial due diligence by the Group’s management prior to their
adoption on the lender panel.
(b) Liquidity risk
The Group maintains sufficient cash to pay its debts as and when they fall due.
(c) Cash flow and fair value interest rate risk
The Group invests in short-term commercial bills and has no significant interest bearing assets; therefore the Group’s
income and operating cash flows are not materially exposed to changes in market interest rates.
The Group does not have borrowings and therefore is not exposed to interest rate risk on borrowings.
46
N OT E 3 CRI T I CA L ACCOU N T I NG ES T I M AT ES A N D J U DGEMEN T S
Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including
expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
(a) Critical accounting estimates and assumptions
The Group makes estimates and assumptions concerning the future. The resulting accounting estimates will, by definition,
seldom equal the related actual results. The estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of causing a material
adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are discussed below.
Trailing commissions
The Company receives trailing commissions from lenders on settled loans over the life of the loan based on the loan book
balance outstanding to which the group is entitled without having to perform further services. The Company also makes
trailing commission payments to Franchisees based on the loan book balance outstanding.
The fair value of trailing commissions receivable and the corresponding payable to Franchisees is determined by using the
discounted cash flow valuation technique. These calculations require the use of assumptions. The key assumptions
underlying the fair value calculations of trailing commissions receivable and the corresponding payable to Franchisees at
balance date include the average loan life, discount rate and the percentage paid to Franchisees. These assumptions are
determined by management with the assistance of external actuaries and are as follows:
Average loan life
Discount rate
Percentage paid to Franchisees
(10 year average)
2006
Between 3.0 and 3.5 years
12%
61%
2005
3.0 years
12%
61%
Were the actual final loan life outcome to differ by +/- 10% from management’s estimates, the impact on the estimates
would be:
■ an increase in net assets of $4.0 million (made up of increases in current assets of $0.8 million, non current assets of
$14.5 million, current liabilities of $0.4 million, non-current liabilities of $9.2 million and deferred tax liabilities of $1.7
million) if favourable; or
■ a decrease in net assets of $3.4 million (made of of decreases in current assets of $0.3 million, non current assets of
$13.0 million, current liabilities of $0.1 million, non-current liabilities of $8.3 million and deferred tax liabilities of $1.5
million if unfavourable.
Management do not consider changes to the percentage paid to Franchisees to be reasonably possible. Changes to the
discount rate are likely to occur as a result of changes to the interest rate. However, management do not consider this to
have a material impact on the fair value calculation of trailing commissions receivable and the corresponding payable to
Franchisees.
(b) Critical judgements in applying the entity’s accounting policies
Judgements that management has made in the process of applying the entity’s accounting policies are not expected to
have a significant effect on the amounts recognised in the financial report.
47
Mortgage Choice Limited
Notes to the financial statements continued
30 June 2006
N OT E 4 SEGMEN T I N F ORM AT I O N
The Mortgage Choice group of companies operates predominantly in Australia and in one segment, the mortgage broking
industry.
N OT E 5 RE V EN U E
Revenue from continuing operations
Sales revenue
Services
Other revenue
Interest (note (a))
Consolidated
Parent entity
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
125,173
108,200
125,173
108,200
15,897
588
15,897
588
141,070
108,788
141,070
108,788
(a) Interest. Interest income includes the unwinding of the discount in relation to receipt of trailing commission as well as interest earned on
deposits and loans, see note 11 (b).
N OT E 6 OT HER I NCOME
Conference sponsorships (note (a))
Settlement of legal claim (note (b))
Amortisation of software licence cost recovery (note (c))
Other
Consolidated
Parent entity
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
948
1,064
948
1,064
-
13
21
500
142
7
-
13
21
500
142
7
982
1,713
982
1,713
(a) Conference sponsorships. Lenders sponsor Mortgage Choice’s National conference, High Flyers’ conference, quarterly state conferences, training
days and workshops.
(b) Settlement of legal claim. In 2005 a settlement of $500,000 was received in relation to legal action taken by the Company against a supplier for
non-performance of contractual obligations.
(c) Amortisation of software licence cost recovery. The cost of software licences purchased for use by Franchisees is recovered from Franchisees.
This cost recovery is amortised over three years, consistent with the amortisation of the corresponding intangible asset.
48
N OT E 7 E X PENSES
Profit from ordinary activities before income tax
includes the following specific expenses:
Finance costs
Interest and finance charges (note (a))
Net loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment
Depreciation
Plant and equipment
Amortisation
Leasehold improvements
Computer software
Other provisions
Employee entitlements
Rental expense relating to operating leases
Defined contribution superannuation expense
Consolidated
Parent entity
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
9,320
73
2
12
9,320
73
2
12
264
271
264
271
263
280
28
839
895
163
366
58
767
843
263
280
28
839
895
163
366
58
767
843
(a) Interest and finance charges. Interest expense includes the unwinding of the discount in relation to payment of trailing commission to
franchisees.
49
Mortgage Choice Limited
Notes to the financial statements continued
30 June 2006
N OT E 8 I NCOME TA X
(a)
Income tax expense
Current tax
Deferred tax
Under (over) provided in prior years
Income tax expense is attributable to:
Profit from continuing operations
Deferred income tax (revenue) expense including
income tax expense comprises:
Consolidated
Parent entity
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
6,567
1,431
(8)
5,664
(58)
4
6,567
1,431
(8)
5,664
(58)
4
7,990
5,610
7,990
5,610
7,990
7,990
5,610
5,610
7,990
7,990
5,610
5,610
(Increase)/decrease in deferred tax assets (note 13)
(3,314)
(58)
(3,314)
Increase/(decrease) in deferred tax liabilities (note 18)
4,745
1,431
-
(58)
4,745
1,431
(58)
-
(58)
(b) Numerical reconciliation of income tax expense to prima facie tax payable
Profit from continuing operations before income tax expense
25,850
18,140
25,850
18,140
Income tax calculated @ 30% (2005 – 30%)
7,755
5,442
7,755
5,442
Consolidated
Parent entity
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
Tax effect of amounts which are not deductible (taxable)
in calculating taxable income:
Entertainment
Share based payments
Sundry items
Under/(over) provision from prior years
Income tax expense
167
76
–
127
27
10
167
76
–
127
27
10
7,998
5,606
7,998
5,606
(8)
4
(8)
4
7,990
5,610
7,990
5,610
No part of the deferred tax asset shown in above and in note 13 is attributable to tax losses.
(c) Tax consolidation legislation
Mortgage Choice and the wholly owned Australian controlled entities have implemented the tax consolidation legislation as
of 1 July 2002. The accounting policy in relation to this legislation is set out in note 1(e).
The wholly owned Australian controlled entities of Mortgage Choice are dormant and have been dormant since the date of
implementation of the tax consolidation legislation. Consequently, no tax sharing agreement is in place as it is not
considered necessary by the Directors.
50
N OT E 9 CURREN T A SSE T S – CA SH A N D CA SH EQU I VA L EN T S
Cash at bank and on hand
Deposits at call
Deposits at call
Consolidated
Parent entity
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
270
8,123
8,393
302
11,160
11,462
270
8,123
8,393
302
11,160
11,462
The deposits are bearing interest rates between 5.63% and 5.88% (2005 – 5.38% and 5.56%). These deposits have an average
maturity of 60 days.
N OT E 10 CURREN T A SSE T S – T R A DE A N D OT HER RECEI VA BL ES
Consolidated
Parent entity
2006
$’000
11,121
40,885
285
125
261
2005
$’000
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
9,377
11,121
9,377
–
40,885
106
88
222
285
125
261
–
106
88
222
52,677
9,793
52,677
9,793
Trade receivables (1)
Net present value of future trailing commissions receivable
Franchisee receivables
Other receivables
Prepayments
(1) Subject to a limited charge in favour of The Loan Book Security Trust (refer to note 15).
(a) Net present value of future trailing commissions receivable
Transition to AASB 132 and AASB 139
The Group has taken the exemption available under AASB 1 First-time Adoption of Australian Equivalents to International
Financial Reporting Standards to apply AASB 132 Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation and AASB 139
Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement from 1 July 2005. At the date of transition to these standards at 1
July 2005, both the Group and the parent entity had a net present value of future trailing commissions receivable not
included in current assets under AGAAP of $36,473,000. Refer to note 11 for the non current portion of these receivables.
(b) Other receivables
These amounts generally arise from transactions outside the usual operating activities of the consolidated entity.
(c) Effective interest rates and credit risk
Information concerning the effective interest rate and credit risk of both current and non-current receivables is set out in
the non-current receivables note (note 11).
(d) Fair values
The carrying amounts of trade and other receivables at year end is a reasonable approximation of their fair values with the
exception of the net present value of future trailing commissions receivable which are accounted for at amortised cost.
51
Mortgage Choice Limited
Notes to the financial statements continued
30 June 2006
N OT E 11 N O N - CURREN T A SSE T S – RECEI VA BL ES
Consolidated
Parent entity
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
Net present value of future trailing commissions receivable
101,823
-
101,823
-
Transition to AASB 132 and AASB 139
The Group has taken the exemption available under AASB 1 First-time Adoption of Australian Equivalents to International
Financial Reporting Standards to apply AASB 132 Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation and AASB 139 Financial
Instruments: Recognition and Measurement from 1 July 2005. At the date of transition to these standards at 1 July 2005, both
the Group and the parent entity had a net present value of future trailing commissions receivable not included in non-current
assets under AGAAP of $90,418,000. Refer to note 10 for the current portion of these receivables.
(a)
Interest rate risk
The Group’s exposure to interest rate risk and the effective weighted average interest rate by maturity periods is set out in
the following tables.
Floating
interest
rate
$’000
-
-
-
-
2006
Trade receivables*
Franchisee and
other receivables
Weighted average
interest rate
Fixed interest maturing in:
1 year
or less
$’000
Over 1
to 2 years
$’000
Over 2
to 3 years
$’000
Over 3
to 4 years
$’000
Over 4
to 5 years
$’000
Over 5
years
$’000
Non-
interest
bearing
$’000
Total
$’000
40,885
30,116
21,710
15,624
11,316
23,057
11,121
153,829
64
-
-
-
-
-
346
410
40,949
30,116
21,710
15,624
11,316
23,057
11,467
154,239
11.99% 12.00% 12.00% 12.00% 12.00% 12.00%
-
* The fixed interest component of trade receivables is represented by future trailing commission discounted to present value using the risk free
interest rate of 12%.
(b) Credit risk
There is no concentration of credit risk with respect to current and non-current receivables, as the Group’s debtors are the
major lending institutions in Australia. Refer to note 2 for more information on the risk management policy of the Group.
52
N OT E 12
N O N - CURREN T A SSE T S – PROPERT Y,
PL A N T A N D EQU I PMEN T
At 1 July 2004
Cost
Accumulated depreciation
Net book amount
Year ended 30 June 2005
Opening net book amount
Additions
Assets included in a disposal group
classified as held for sale and other
disposals
Depreciation charge
Closing net book amount
At 30 June 2005
Cost
Accumulated depreciation
Net book amount
Year ended 30 June 2006
Opening net book amount
Additions
Disposals
Depreciation charge
Closing net book amount
At 30 June 2006
Cost
Accumulated depreciation
Net book amount
Consolidated
Parent entity
Plant and
Equipment
$’000
Leasehold
Improvements
$’000
Total
$’000
Plant and
Equipment
$’000
Leasehold
Improvements
$’000
Total
$’000
2,855
(2,131)
724
724
267
(22)
(271)
698
3,100
(2,402)
698
927
(563)
364
364
563
-
(163)
764
1,490
(726)
764
3,782
(2,694)
1,088
2,855
(2,131)
724
1,088
830
(22)
(434)
1,462
724
267
(22)
(271)
698
4,590
3,100
(3,128)
(2,402)
1,462
698
927
(563)
364
364
563
-
(163)
764
1,490
(726)
764
3,782
(2,694)
1,088
1,088
830
(22)
(434)
1,462
4,590
(3,128)
1,462
Consolidated
Parent entity
Plant and
Equipment
$’000
Leasehold
Improvements
$’000
Total
$’000
Plant and
Equipment
$’000
Leasehold
Improvements
$’000
Total
$’000
698
197
(57)
(264)
574
3,031
(2,457)
574
764
135
(18)
(263)
618
1,504
(886)
618
1,462
332
(75)
(527)
1,192
698
197
(57)
(264)
574
4,535
3,031
(3,343)
(2,457)
1,192
574
764
135
(18)
(263)
618
1,504
(886)
618
1,462
332
(75)
(527)
1,192
4,535
(3,343)
1,192
53
Mortgage Choice Limited
Notes to the financial statements continued
30 June 2006
N OT E 13 N O N - CURREN T A SSE T S – DEFERRED TA X A SSE T S
The balance comprises temporary differences attributable to:
Amounts recognised in profit or loss
Employee benefits
Provision for legal costs
Depreciation and amortisation
Accrued expenses
NPV of future trailing commissions payable
Less amortisation of future trailing commissions payable
Amounts recognised directly in equity
Consolidated
Parent entity
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
647
-
325
147
10,815
(7,492)
617
28
286
169
-
-
647
-
325
147
10,815
(7,492)
617
28
286
169
-
-
4,442
1,100
4,442
1,100
NPVof future trailing commissions payable at 1 July 2005
23,132
-
23,132
Share issue expenses
78
106
Set-off of deferred tax assets pursuant to set-off provisions (note 18)
27,652
(26,455)
-
106
78
27,652
-
(26,455)
-
Net deferred tax assets
Movements:
Opening balance at 1 July
Change on adoption of AASB 132 and AASB 139 (note 1)
Credited/(charged) to the income statement (note 8)
Credited/(charged) to equity
Closing balance at 30 June
Deferred tax assets to be recovered after more than 12 months
Deferred tax assets to be recovered within 12 months
1,197
1,206
1,197
1,206
1,206
23,132
3,314
-
27,652
19,604
8,048
27,652
1,158
1,206
1,158
-
23,132
(58)
106
3,314
-
-
(58)
106
1,206
27,652
1,206
403
803
19,604
8,048
403
803
1,206
27,652
1,206
54
N OT E 14 N O N - CURREN T A SSE T S – I N TA NGI BL E A SSE T S
At 1 July 2004
Cost
Accumulated amortisation
Net book amount
Year ended 30 June 2005
Opening net book amount
Additions
Assets included in a disposal group classified
as held for sale and other disposals
Amortisation charge
Closing net book amount
At 30 June 2005
Cost
Accumulated amortisation
Net book amount
Year ended 30 June 2006
Opening net book amount
Additions
Amortisation charge
Closing net book amount
At 30 June 2006
Cost
Accumulated amortisation
Net book amount
*Capitalised computer software includes internally generated software development costs.
Consolidated
Parent entity
Computer Software*
$’000
Computer Software*
$’000
1,827
(1,053)
774
774
1,065
(1)
(366)
1,472
2,893
(1,421)
1,472
1,827
(1,053)
774
774
1,065
(1)
(366)
1,472
2,893
(1,421)
1,472
Consolidated
Parent entity
Computer Software*
$’000
Computer Software*
$’000
1,472
883
(280)
2,075
3,776
(1,701)
2,075
1,472
883
(280)
2,075
3,776
(1,701)
2,075
55
Mortgage Choice Limited
Notes to the financial statements continued
30 June 2006
N OT E 15 CURREN T L I A BI L I T I ES – T R A DE A N D OT HER PAYA BL ES
Trade payables(1)
Net present value of future trailing commissions payable
Licence fees repayable
Other payables
Net present value of future trailing commissions payable
Transition to AASB 132 and AASB 139
Consolidated
Parent entity
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
8,454
24,174
400
3,237
7,948
-
372
3,265
8,454
24,174
400
3,237
7,948
-
372
3,265
36,265
11,585
36,265
11,585
The Group has taken the exemption available under AASB 1 First-time Adoption of Australian Equivalents to International
Financial Reporting Standards to apply AASB 132 Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation and AASB 139 Financial
Instruments: Recognition and Measurement from 1 July 2005. At the date of transition to these standards at 1 July 2005, both
the Group and the parent entity had a net present value of future trailing commissions payable not included in current liabilities
under AGAAP of $20,991,000.
(1) Loan Book Security Trust
The loan book bonus is a commission payable based on the outstanding balances of loans introduced by Mortgage Choice
Franchisees. The Loan Book Security Scheme provides security for the loan book bonus payable to certain eligible Franchisees
based on certain performance criteria. Mortgage Choice Limited has granted two charges in favour of a trustee company on
behalf of the eligible Franchisees. At this time the trustee is a controlled entity of Mortgage Choice Limited.
The first charge is over a specified percentage of the Company’s trailing commission income. The purpose of this charge is to be
the first source of funds available to eligible Franchisees for the payment of loan book bonus payments in the event that
administration or liquidation occurs. The charge will crystallise and can be enforced by eligible Franchisees in the event of
liquidation or administration of Mortgage Choice Limited.
As at 30 June 2006, the amount subject to charge resulting from applying the specified percentage to the trailing commission
subsequently received by Mortgage Choice Limited is $2,528,625 (2005 - $2,040,764). This is included as part of the balance of
trade creditors at 30 June 2006 and is subject to charge until disbursed to the eligible Franchisees. The amount subject to the
charge will vary dependant on trailing commission received by Mortgage Choice Limited from time to time and Franchisee
performance.
The second charge is a floating charge over all of the assets of Mortgage Choice Limited. It is limited in the powers it allows the
security trustee company to exercise prior to liquidation. Its primary purpose is to ensure that the loan book security structure
need not be subject to the moratorium arising if an administrator were to be appointed to Mortgage Choice Limited. Only after
liquidation does this charge confer comprehensive mortgagee powers on the security trustee.
Fair values
The carrying amounts of trade and other payables at year end is a reasonable approximation of their fair values with the exception
of the net present value of future trailing commissions payable which are accounted for at amortised cost.
N OT E 16 CURREN T L I A BI L I T I ES – PROV ISI O NS
Employee entitlements –annual leave
517
530
517
530
Consolidated
Parent entity
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
56
N OT E 17 N O N - CURREN T L I A BI L I T I ES – PAYA BL ES
Net present value of future trailing commissions payable
Licence fees repayable
Net present value of future trailing commissions payable
Transition to AASB 132 and AASB 139
Consolidated
Parent entity
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
64,010
200
64,210
-
64,010
232
232
200
64,210
-
232
232
The Group has taken the exemption available under AASB 1 First-time Adoption of Australian Equivalents to International
Financial Reporting Standards to apply AASB 132 Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation and AASB 139 Financial
Instruments: Recognition and Measurement from 1 July 2005. At the date of transition to these standards at 1 July 2005, both
the Group and the parent entity had a net present value of future trailing commissions payable not included in non-current
liabilities under AGAAP of $56,119,000.
N OT E 18 N O N - CURREN T L I A BI L I T I ES – DEFERRED TA X L I A BI L I T I ES
The balance comprises temporary differences attributable to:
Amounts recognised in profit or loss
NPV of future trailing commissions receivable
Less amortisation of trailing commissions receivable
Amounts recognised directly in equity
NPV of future trailing commissions receivable at 1 July 2005
Set-off of deferred tax assets pursuant to set-off provisions (note 13)
Net deferred tax liabilities
Movements:
Opening balance at 1 July
Change on adoption of AASB 132 and AASB 139 (note 1)
Charged to the income statement (note 8)
Closing balance at 30 June
Deferred tax liabilities to be settled after more than 12 months
Deferred tax liabilities to be settled within 12 months
Consolidated
Parent entity
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
17,767
(13,022)
4,745
38,067
42,812
(26,455)
16,357
-
38,067
4,745
42,812
30,547
12,265
42,812
17,767
(13,022)
4,745
38,067
42,812
(26,455)
16,357
-
38,067
4,745
42,812
30,547
12,265
42,812
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
N OT E 19 N O N - CURREN T L I A BI L I T I ES – PROV ISI O NS
Employee entitlements – long service leave
185
144
185
144
Consolidated
Parent entity
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
57
Mortgage Choice Limited
Notes to the financial statements continued
30 June 2006
N OT E 20 CO N T RI BU T ED EQU I T Y
(a) Share capital
Parent entity
Parent entity
2006
number
’000
2005
number
’000
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
Ordinary shares – fully paid
117,593
117,593
203
203
Ordinary shares entitle the holder to participate in dividends and the proceeds on winding up of the company in proportion to the
number of and amounts paid on the shares held.
On a show of hands every holder of ordinary shares present at a meeting in person or by proxy, is entitled to one vote, and upon
a poll each share is entitled to one vote.
(b) Movements in ordinary share capital:
Date
1 July 2004
20 July 2004
27 July 2004
Details
Opening balance
Issue of shares upon exercise of options
Issue of shares upon exercise of options
4 August 2004
Share issue for no consideration
6 August 2004
Capital reduction
9 August 2004
Offset, by share capital reduction, of accumulated
losses
Number of
shares
Transaction
price
$’000
109,830,000
1,098,300
1,098,300
74,667
$0.988
$0.988
-
8,293
1,085
1,085
-
-
-
$0.08
(8,962)
-
(6,780)
10 August 2004
Initial Public Offering
5,491,500
$1.05
10 August 2004
Initial Public Offering –associated costs
Deferred tax asset in relation to IPO costs
30 June 2006
Balance
-
-
117,592,767
-
-
5,766
(406)
122
203
■ During July 2004, 2,196,600 shares were issued for 98.8 cents each resulting from the exercise of options prior to
transfer and allotment of shares under the Initial Public Offering.
■ A capital reduction of $8,962,000 was paid on 6 August 2004 by returning 8.0 cents per share in cash to the existing
shareholders.
■ On 9 August 2004, an offset by share capital reduction, of accumulated losses of $6,780,000 against contributed
equity, occurred three business days after the transfer and allotment of shares under the offer.
■ On 10 August 2004, issue of 5,491,500 ordinary shares to franchises, employees and other persons raising $5,360,000
(net of issue costs of $406,000) and listing of the Company on the ASX.
(c) Employee share scheme
Information relating to the employee share scheme, including details of shares issued under the scheme, are set out in note
32.
(d) Options
On 10 December 2001, 2,196,600 share options were issued to former non-executive Directors in accordance with
shareholder approval. These share options were exercised on 20 July 2004 and 27 July 2004 at 98.8 cents per share.
Information relating to the Mortgage Choice Executive Performance Option Plan, including details of options issued,
exercised and lapsed during the financial year and options outstanding at the end of the financial year are set out in the
Directors report – refer to section D of the Remuneration report on pages 25 to 28.
58
N OT E 21 RESERV ES A N D RE TA I N ED PRO FI T S
(a) Reserves
Share-based payments reserve
343
-
343
-
Consolidated
Parent entity
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
Movements:
General reserve
Balance 1 July
Dividends provided for out of general reserve
Balance 30 June
Movements:
Share-based payments reserve
Balance 1 July
Options and performance shares expensed
Balance 30 June
(b) Retained profits/(accumulated losses)
Balance 1 July
-
-
-
91
252
343
5,349
(5,349)
-
-
91
91
-
-
-
91
252
343
5,349
(5,349)
-
-
91
91
Consolidated
Parent entity
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
9,489
(6,780)
9,489
(6,780)
Offset, by share capital reduction, of accumulated losses
-
6,780
-
6,780
Adjustment on adoption of AASB 132 and AASB 139, net of tax (note 33)
34,847
-
34,847
Net profit for period
Dividends
Balance 30 June
(c) Nature and purpose of reserves
Share-based payments reserve
17,860
12,530
17,860
(15,287)
(3,041)
(15,287)
46,909
9,489
46,909
-
12,530
(3,041)
9,489
The share-based payments reserve is used to recognise the fair value of options and performance shares granted but not
vested.
59
Mortgage Choice Limited
Notes to the financial statements continued
30 June 2006
N OT E 22 DI V I DEN DS
(a) Ordinary shares
Interim dividend declared out of the general reserve of 3.5 cents per fully
paid share paid on 5 August 2004:
Fully franked based on tax paid @ 30.0%
3.5 cents per share
Interim dividend declared out of the general reserve and out of profits of the Company for
the half-year ended 31 December 2004 of 3.8 cents per fully paid share paid on 29 April 2005:
Fully franked based on tax paid @ 30.0%
3.8 cents per share
From general reserve
From profit
Final dividend declared out of profits of the Company for the year ended
30 June 2005 of 6.0 cents per fully paid share paid on 19 September 2005:
Fully franked based on tax paid @ 30.0%
6.0 cents per share
Interim dividend declared out of profits of the Company for the half-year ended
31 December 2005 of 5.0 cents per fully paid share paid 21 March 2006:
Fully franked based on tax paid @ 30.0%
5.0 cents per share
Special dividend declared out of retained profits at 31 December 2005
of 2.0 cents per fully paid share paid 21 March 2006:
Fully franked based on tax paid @ 30.0%
2.0 cents per share
Parent entity
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
-
-
-
7,056
5,879
2,352
15,287
3,921
1,428
3,041
-
-
-
8,390
(b) Dividends not recognised at year end
In addition to the above dividends, since year end the directors have recommended the payment of a
final dividend of 7.5 cents per fully paid ordinary share, (2005 - 6.0 cents) fully franked based on tax paid
at 30.0%. The aggregate amount of the proposed dividend expected to be paid on 18 September 2006
out of retained profits at 30 June 2006, but not recognised as a liability at year end, is
8,819
(c) Franked dividend
The franked portions of the final dividends recommended after 30 June 2006 will be franked out of existing franking
credits or out of franking credits arising from the payment of income tax in the year ending 30 June 2007.
Franking credits available for subsequent financial years
based on a tax rate of 30.0%
Consolidated
Parent entity
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
4,542
4,539
4,542
4,539
The above amounts represent the balance of the franking account as at the end of the financial year, adjusted for:
(a)
franking credits that will arise from the payment of the amount of the provision for income tax;
(b)
franking debits that will arise from the payment of dividends recognised as a liability at the reporting date; and
(c)
franking credits that will arise from the receipt of dividends recognised as receivables at the reporting date.
The consolidated amounts include franking credits that would be available to the parent entity if distributable profits of
subsidiaries were paid as dividends.
The impact on the franking account of the dividend recommended by the Directors since year end, but not recognised as a
liability at year end, will be a reduction in the franking account of $3,788,000 (2005: $3,024,000).
60
N OT E 23 K E Y M A N AGEMEN T PER SO N N EL DISCLOSURES
(a) Directors
The following persons were directors of Mortgage Choice Limited during the financial year:
(i) Chairman – non-executive
P D Ritchie
(ii) Executive Directors
P A Lahiff, Managing Director
(iii)
Non-executive Directors
P G Higgins
R G Higgins
S C Jermyn
D E Ralston
(b) Other key management personnel
The following persons, all employees of Mortgage Choice Limited, also had authority and responsibility for planning,
directing and controlling the activities of the Group, directly or indirectly, during the financial year:
Name
Position
A D Crossley
A J Fraser
M C Newton
D M Hoskins
W J O’Rourke
M N Writer
L A Wyatt
D B Bayes
I C Pepper
Chief Operating Officer (3/10/2005 – 30/6/2006)
Chief Financial Officer (1/7/2005 – 3/10/2005)
Chief Financial Officer (3/10/2005 – 30/6/2006)
Corporate Finance & Strategy (1/7/2005 – 3/10/2005)
Chief Information Officer
Company Secretary
National Manager Corporate Affairs
Human Resources Manager (19/9/05 – 30/6/06)
National Marketing Manager (15/5/2006 - 30/6/2006)
Chief Operating Officer 1/7/2005 – 30/9/2005)
National Marketing Manager (1/7/2005 - 19/5/2006)
All of the above persons were also specified executives during the year ended 30 June 2005, except for M N Writer who
commenced employment with the group on 19 September 2005 and L A Wyatt who commenced employment with the
Group on 15 May 2006.
(c) Key management personnel compensation
Short-term employee benefits
Post-employment benefits
Share-based payments
Consolidated
Parent entity
2006
$
2005
$
2006
$
2005
$
2,613,620
2,426,671
2,613,620
2,426,671
239,604
214,709
239,604
214,709
157,764
90,990
157,764
90,990
3,010,988
2,732,371 3,010,988
2,732,371
The Company has taken advantage of the relief provided by Corporations Regulations CR2M.6.04 and has transferred the detailed
remuneration disclosures to the Directors’ report. The relevant information can be found in sections A-C of the remuneration
report on pages 20-24.
61
Mortgage Choice Limited
Notes to the financial statements continued
30 June 2006
(d) Equity instrument disclosures relating to key management personnel
(i) Options and performance shares provided as remuneration and shares issued on exercise of such options
Details of options and performance shares provided as remuneration and shares issued on the exercise of such options,
together with terms and conditions of the options, can be found in section D of the remuneration report on pages 25-28.
(ii) Option holdings
The numbers of options over ordinary shares in the Company held during the financial year by each Director of
Mortgage Choice Limited and other key management personnel of the Group, including their personally related
parties, are set out below.
2006
Name
Directors of
Mortgage Choice Limited
Balance at the
start of the
year
Granted
during the
year as
compensation
Exercised
during the
year
Other changes
during the
year
Balance at the
end of the
year
Vested and
exercisable at
the end of the
year
P A Lahiff
323,200
424,100
Other key management
personnel of the Group
A D Crossley
A J Fraser
M C Newton
D S Bayes
2005
Name
Directors of
Mortgage Choice Limited
P A Lahiff
Other key management
personnel of the Group
A D Crossley
M C Newton
D S Bayes
81,800
128,600
-
71,400
92,200
108,900
126,000
-
Balance at the
start of the
year
Granted
during the
year as
compensation
Exercised
during the
year
-
-
-
-
323,200
81,800
92,200
126,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(126,000)
747,300
210,400
71,400
201,100
-
-
-
-
-
-
Other changes
during the
year
Balance at the
end of the
year
Vested and
exercisable at
the end of the
year
-
-
-
-
323,200
81,800
92,200
126,000
-
-
-
-
62
(iii) Performance share rights
The number of performance share rights held during the financial year by each Director of Mortgage Choice Limited
and other key management personnel of the Group, including their personally related parties, are set out below.
2006
Name
Directors of
Mortgage Choice Limited
Balance at the
start of the
year
Granted
during the
year as
compensation
Exercised
during the
year
Other changes
during the
year
Balance at the
end of the
year
Vested at the
end of the
year
P A Lahiff
97,000
83,300
Other key management
personnel of the Group
A D Crossley
A J Fraser
M C Newton
D M Hoskins
W J O’Rourke
M N Writer
D S Bayes*
I C Pepper*
24,500
24,700
27,600
33,900
30,800
-
37,807
30,500
25,300
14,000
21,400
26,200
23,800
14,200
-
-
* Entitlement to shares has been forfeited as part of termination of employment.
2005
Name
Directors of
Mortgage Choice Limited
P A Lahiff
Other key management
personnel of the Group
A D Crossley
A J Fraser
M C Newton
D M Hoskins
W J O’Rourke
D S Bayes
I C Pepper
P V Borg*
Balance at the
start
of the year
Granted
during the
year as
compensation
Exercised
during the
year
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
97,000
24,500
24,700
27,600
33,900
30,800
37,807
30,500
31,200
* Entitlement to shares has been forfeited as part of termination of employment.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(37,807)
(30,500)
180,300
49,800
38,700
49,000
60,100
54,600
14,200
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Other changes
during the
year
Balance at the
end of the
year
Vested at the
end of the
year
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(31,200)
97,000
24,500
24,700
27,600
33,900
30,800
37,807
30,500
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
63
Mortgage Choice Limited
Notes to the financial statements continued
30 June 2006
(vi) Share holdings
The number of shares in the Company held during the financial year by each Director of Mortgage Choice Limited and
other key management personnel of the Group, including their personally related parties, are set out below. There
were no shares granted during the reporting period as compensation.
Balance
at the start of
the year
Received
during the
year on the
exercise of
options
Other changes
during the
year
Balance
at the end of
the year
2006
Name
Directors of Mortgage Choice Limited
P D Ritchie
P A Lahiff
P G Higgins
R G Higgins
S C Jermyn
D E Ralston
Other key management personnel of the Group
A D Crossley
A Fraser
M C Newton
D M Hoskins
W J O’Rourke
M N Writer
L A Wyatt
D Bayes*
I C Pepper*
297,297
100,000
25,286,534
26,841,583
2,000,000
50,000
-
-
-
50
1,500
-
-
-
11,000
*I C Pepper and D Bayes were not employees of the Group at 30 June 2006.
2005
Name
Directors of Mortgage Choice Limited
Balance
at the start of
the year
Received
during the
year on the
exercise of
options
P D Ritchie
P A Lahiff
P G Higgins
R G Higgins
S C Jermyn
D E Ralston
Other key management personnel of the Group
A D Crossley
A Fraser
M C Newton
D M Hoskins
D Bayes
I C Pepper
C P Canty
-
-
36,959,950
38,515,000
-
-
-
-
-
50
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
52,828
-
350,125
100,000
(16,850,000)
8,436,534
(6,850,000)
19,991,583
2,000,000
4,000,000
50,000
50,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
N/a
N/a
-
-
-
50
1,500
-
-
N/a
N/a
Other changes
during the
year
Balance
at the end of
the year
297,297
100,000
297,297
100,000
(11,673,416)
25,286,534
(11,673,417)
26,841,583
2,000,000
2,000,000
50,000
50,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
50
-
11,000
11,000
-
-
Shareholdings of Directors and other key management personnel of the Group include those that have been disclosed under
representation made to them by the parties within the AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures. The Directors and other key
management personnel have relied upon the representations made as they have no control or influence over the financial affairs
of the personally related entities to substantiate the shareholdings declared. Where a personally related entity has declined to
provide shareholding details, the shareholding of that personally related entity has been assumed to be nil.
64
N OT E 24 REMU N ER AT I O N O F AU DI TOR S
During the year the following fees were paid or payable for services provided by the auditor of the parent entity, its related
practices and non-related audit firms:
Assurance services
1. Audit services
PricewaterhouseCoopers Australian firm:
Audit and review of financial reports and other audit work under the
Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)
Total remuneration for audit services
2. Other assurance services
PricewaterhouseCoopers Australian firm:
Due diligence services
Other assurance services
Total remuneration for other assurance services
Consolidated
Parent
2006
$
2005
$
2006
$
2005
$
228,350
122,000
228,350
122,000
228,350
122,000
228,350
122,000
-
7,000
7,000
40,401
16,000
56,401
-
7,000
7,000
40,401
16,000
56,401
Total remuneration for assurance services
235,350
178,401
235,350
178,401
Taxation services
PricewaterhouseCoopers Australian firm:
Tax compliance services, including review of company income tax
returns
18,800
110,330
18,800
110,330
Other tax services
15,283
10,475
15,283
10,475
Total remuneration for taxation services
34,083
120,805
34,083
120,805
Advisory services
PricewaterhouseCoopers Australian firm:
Initial Public Offering Services
Total remuneration for advisory services
N OT E 25 CO N T I NGENCI ES
Contingent liabilities
-
-
115,380
115,380
-
-
115,380
115,380
The parent entity and consolidated entity had contingent liabilities at 30 June 2006 in respect of:
Guarantees
Guarantees given in respect of:
■ premises leases $244,666 (2005: $330,857); and
■ Western Australia broker licences $50,000 (2005: $300,000).
Contingent claims
From time to time disputes occur between the Company and its Franchisees in the normal course of operation, a number of
which may be unresolved at any point in time. At 30 June 2006 there were no disputes or claims in progress that are expected to
have a material financial impact on the Company.
No material losses are anticipated in respect of any of the above contingent liabilities.
65
Mortgage Choice Limited
Notes to the financial statements continued
30 June 2006
N OT E 26 COMM I T MEN T S
Operating leases
Operating lease expenditure contracted for at the reporting date but not
recognised as liabilities payable:
Within one year
Later than one year but not later than five years
Consolidated
Parent entity
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
623
807
1,430
701
1,451
2,152
623
807
1,430
701
1,451
2,152
Operating leases
The Company leases various offices under non-cancellable operating leases expiring within one to eight years. The leases have
varying terms, escalation clauses and renewal rights. On renewal, the terms of the leases are renegotiated. The Company also
leases various office equipment under non-cancellable operating leases.
N OT E 27 REL AT ED PA RT Y T R A NSACT I O NS
(a) Parent entities
The parent entity within the Group is Mortgage Choice Limited.
(b) Subsidiaries
Interests in subsidiaries are set out in note 28.
(c) Key management personnel
Disclosures relating to key management personnel are set out in note 23.
There were no transactions between Mortgage Choice Limited and its subsidiaries during the years ended 30 June 2006 and 30
June 2005.
N OT E 28 SU BSI DI A RI ES
Name of entity
Country of
incorporation
Class of
Shares
Equity holding
2006
%
2005
%
Cost of parent entity’s
investment
2006
$
2005
$
Mortgage Choice (W.A.) Pty Limited
Australia
Ordinary
MC Loan Book Security Pty Limited
Australia
Ordinary
Choice Share Limited
(deregistered 9/10/05)
Finance Australia Pty Ltd
(deregistered 14/8/05)
MC Franchise System Pty Ltd
(deregistered 14/8/05)
FAC Pty Ltd
(deregistered 21/8/05)
Mortgage Choice Insurance Broker Pty Ltd
(deregistered 21/8/05)
Australia
Ordinary
Australia
Ordinary
Australia
Ordinary
Australia
Ordinary
Australia
Ordinary
100
100
-
-
-
-
-
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
2
-
-
-
-
-
100
2
5
2
2
2
2
102
115
66
N OT E 29 E V EN T S OCCURRI NG A F T ER T HE BA L A NCE SHEE T DAT E
Dividend payment
A final ordinary dividend of $8,819,000 (7.5 cents per fully paid share) was declared out of profits of the Company for the year
ended 30 June 2006 on 23 August 2006 and paid on 18 September 2006.
The financial effects of the above transaction have not been brought to account at 30 June 2006.
N OT E 30
RECO NCI L I AT I O N O F PRO FI T A F T ER I NCOME TA X TO N E T
CA SH I N FLOW FROM OPER AT I NG ACT I V I T I ES
Profit for the year
Depreciation and amortisation
Non-cash employee expense benefits – share-based payments
Interest received from the trailing commissions
Interest paid on the trailing commissions
Interest received on cash and deposits at call
Net loss on sale of non-current assets
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Consolidated
Parent entity
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
17,860
12,530
17,860
12,530
806
252
(15,216)
9,320
(681)
74
800
91
-
-
(588)
12
806
252
(15,216)
9,320
(681)
74
800
91
-
-
(588)
12
(Increase)/decrease in trade and other debtors
(2,345)
(1,282)
(2,345)
(1,282)
Decrease/(increase) in deferred tax asset
(Increase)/decrease in other operating assets
Increase/(decrease) in trade creditors
(Decrease)/increase in other operating liabilities
(Decrease)/increase in provision for income taxes payable
Increase/(decrease) in provision for deferred income tax
Increase/(decrease) in other provisions
9
(255)
2,248
(32)
(753)
1,422
41
74
1,001
(453)
(213)
1,792
-
31
9
(255)
2,248
(32)
(753)
1,422
41
74
1,001
(453)
(213)
1,792
-
31
Net cash inflow from operating activities
12,750
13,795
12,750
13,795
67
Mortgage Choice Limited
Notes to the financial statements continued
30 June 2006
N OT E 31 E A RN I NGS PER SH A RE
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
Earnings used in calculating earnings per share – profit from continuing operations
Consolidated
2006
Cents
2005
Cents
15.2
15.0
$’000
17,860
10.7
10.7
$’000
12,530
2006
Number
2005
Number
Weighted average number of shares used as the denominator
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used as the denominator in calculating basic
earnings per share
117,592,767
116,848,597
Adjustments for calculation of diluted earnings per share:
Rights and options
Weighted average number of ordinary shares and potential ordinary shares used as the
denominator in calculating diluted earnings per share
1,179,070
424,067
118,771,837
117,272,664
Information concerning the classification of securities
(a) Options
Options granted to employees under the Mortgage Choice Executive Performance Option Plan are considered to be potential
ordinary shares and have been included in the determination of diluted earnings per share. The options have not been included in
the determination of basic earnings per share. Details relating to the options are set out in the remuneration report.
(b)
Rights
Rights to shares issued to employees under the Mortgage Choice Performance Share Plan are considered to be potential ordinary
shares and have been included in the determination of diluted earnings per share. The rights have not been included in the
determination of basic earnings per share. Details relating to the options are set out in the remuneration report.
68
N OT E 32 SH A RE- BA SED PAY MEN T S
(a) Executive Performance Option Plan (EPOP)
The Executive Performance Option Plan may be offered on an annual basis to a limited number of the most senior
executives within the Company. The issue of options has been confined to the Managing Director and the Company’s three
most senior executives, being the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Information Officer.
Participation in the EPOP provides one component of the market-based long-term incentive available to the selected
executives within their aggregate remuneration package.
Under the terms of the EPOP, options (each over one share) are granted to senior executives identified by the Board. Any
options offered and granted to the executives have an exercise price based on the market value of the Company’s shares at
the time of offer. Market value will be the trade-weighted average price of the Company’s shares over the one-week period
immediately preceding the date of offer.
The options offered to executives under the EPOP are subject to performance conditions set by the Board. Offers have a
three-year performance period. In relation to options offered during the year ended 30 June 2006, the performance
requirement will be based on the total shareholder return (TSR) of the Company compared to the TSRs of a comparator
group of companies. TSR is the percentage increase in the Company’s share price plus reinvested dividends, expressed as a
percentage of the initial investment, and reflects the increase in value delivered to Shareholders over the period.
The Company’s TSR will be compared to the TSRs of companies in a comparator group comprised of selected S & P ASX
Top 300 companies, being entities of broadly similar size to that of Mortgage Choice, but excluding mining and resource
companies and property trust companies or trusts, over the performance period. The comparator companies have been
drawn from a group within an approximate range of 40% to 200% of the market capitalisation of Mortgage Choice at the
time of listing.
The companies comprising the comparator group are iiNET Limited, Invocare Limited, Clough Limited, Programmed
Maintenance Services Limited, Rebel Sport Limited, Sunland Group Limited, Globe International Limited, Psivida Limited,
Village Life Limited, Capral Aluminium Limited, Brazin Limited, Peptech Limited, AAV Limited, Hpal Limited, SDI Limited,
Gribbles Group Limited (The), ERG Limited, Schaffer Corporation Limited, Nylex Limited, Silex Systems Limited, Volante Group
Limited, Technology One Limited, SAI Global Limited, Henry Walker Eltin Group Limited, Cellestis Limited, Villa World Limited,
Boom Logistics Limited, Sirtex Medical Limited, Vision Systems Limited, Collection House Limited, Maxitrans Industries Limited,
Keycorp Limited, Symex Holdings Limited, Virotec International Limited, SMS Management & Technology Limited, UXC
Limited, Norwood Abbey Limited, Institute Of Drug Technology Australia Limited, Macmahon Holdings Limited, Tempo
Services Limited, Agenix Limited, Unitract Limited, Genetic Technologies Limited, Atlas Group Holdings Limited, Circadian
Technologies Limited, Peppercorn Investment Fund, Primelife Corporation Limited, Kresta Holdings Limited, Coffey
International Limited, Orbital Engine Corporation Limited, Citect Corporation Limited and Multimedia Limited.
If any of the companies in the comparator group ceases to exist in its current form for any reason other than its liquidation,
or if the Board determines in its discretion that a company should no longer be in the comparator group because of an
anomaly, distortion or other event that is not directly related to the financial performance of that company, that company
will cease to form part of the comparator group.
Options will not become exercisable unless Mortgage Choice’s TSR is above the 50th percentile of the comparator group at
the end of the performance period. Above the 50th percentile, options will vest and become exercisable in accordance with
a vesting scale.
The vesting scale is as follows:
Company Performance (TSR Percentile Ranking)
Percentage of offered options allocated
At or below the 50th percentile
At the 51st percentile
75th percentile or above
0%
52%
100%
Between the 51st percentile and 75th percentiles, an additional 2.0% of options will vest for every percentile increase in TSR ranking.
The rules of the EPOP permit the Company to issue new shares or to purchase shares on-market for the purposes of satisfying the
exercise of options.
69
Mortgage Choice Limited
Notes to the financial statements continued
30 June 2006
Any options which do not become exercisable following the application of the performance condition and vesting scale will lapse.
An option that has become exercisable but is not exercised will lapse on the earlier of:
■ 10 years after the date of offer;
■ three months, or such other period determined by the Board, after the participant ceases employment for a reason other than
a ‘qualifying reason’ (i.e. death, total and permanent disability, redundancy, and any other reason determined by the Board);
and
■ 12 months, or such other period determined by the Board, after the participant ceases employment for a ‘qualifying reason’.
Where a participant ceases to be employed by the Company other than because of a ‘qualifying reason’, any options that have
not become exercisable will lapse. However, if there is cessation of employment due to a ‘qualifying reason’, the Board may
determine that some or all of the options may vest. In the event of a change of control of the Company, all options will vest.
If the Board determines that a participant has acted fraudulently or dishonestly, has committed an act of harassment or
discrimination, is in serious breach of any duty to Mortgage Choice, or, in the Board’s reasonable opinion, has brought Mortgage
Choice into serious disrepute, any options held by the participant will lapse.
Details of options over ordinary shares in the Company provided as remuneration to each Director and key management
personnel of Mortgage Choice Limited are set out below. When exercisable, each option is convertible into one ordinary share of
Mortgage Choice Limited. Further information on the options is set out in the remuneration report.
Set out below are summaries of options granted under the plan:
Grant Date
Expiry
date
Exercise
price
Balance at
start of
the year
Granted
during the
year
Exercised
during the
year
Expired
during the
year
Forfeited
during the
year
Balance at
end of the
year
Exercisable
at end of
the year
Number
Number
Number
Number
Number
Number
Number
Consolidated and parent entity – 2006
10 August
2004
4 January
2005
10 August
2014
4 January
2015
24 February
2005
24 February
2015
2 September
2005
2 September
2015
Total
Weighted
average
exercise price
Grant Date
$1.05
415,400
$0.91
126,000
$1.08
81,800
-
-
-
$1.43
-
733,000
623,200
733,000
$1.03
$1.43
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
415,400
(126,000)
-
-
-
81,800
733,000
(126,000) 1,230,200
$0.91
$1.28
-
-
-
-
-
-
Expiry
date
Exercise
price
Balance at
start of
the year
Granted
during the
year
Exercised
during the
year
Expired
during the
year
Forfeited
during the
year
Balance at
end of the
year
Exercisable
at end of
the year
Number
Number
Number
Number
Number
Number
Number
Consolidated and parent entity – 2005
10 August
2004
4 January
2005
10 August
2014
4 January
2015
24 February
2005
24 February
2015
$1.05
$0.91
$1.08
Total
Weighted
average
exercise price
-
-
-
-
-
621,500
126,000
81,800
829,300
$1.03
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(206,100)
415,400
-
-
126,000
81,800
(206,100)
623,200
$1.05
$1.03
-
-
-
-
-
The weighted average remaining contractual life of share options outstanding at the end of the period was 1.78 years (2005 -
2.26 years).
The assessed fair value at grant date of options granted to individuals is allocated equally over the period from grant date to
vesting date, and the amount is included in the remuneration tables on the previous page. Fair values at grant date are
independently determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model utilising a Black-Scholes option pricing model framework that
takes into account the exercise price, the term of the option, the vesting and performance criteria, the impact of dilution, the
70
non-tradeable nature of the option, the share price at grant date and expected price volatility of the underlying share, the
expected dividend yield and the risk-free interest rate for the term of the option.
The model inputs for options granted during the year ended 30 June 2006 included:
(a)
options are granted for no consideration, each tranche vests and is exercisable after three anniversaries of the date of
grant;
(b)
exercise price: $1.43;
(c)
grant date: 2 September 2005;
(d)
expiry date: 2 September 2015;
(e)
share price at grant date: $1.43;
(f)
(g)
(h)
expected price volatility of the company’s shares: 30.0%;
expected dividend yield: 6.0%; and
risk-free interest rate: 5.0%.
(b) Performance Share Plan (PSP)
The PSP permits eligible senior managers identified by the Board to be offered conditional entitlements to shares. The
shares allocated to those employees are subject to the achievement of performance requirements specified by the Board.
The PSP is designed to provide the long-term incentive component of remuneration for senior managers, in line with the
Company’s overall reward strategy, which aims to attract, motivate and retain high-performing managers.
Participation in the PSP is offered on an annual basis. Eligible senior managers are offered shares to a value determined by
reference to the Company’s reward policy and market practice with regard to long-term incentive arrangements provided
by peer organisations. The actual number of shares allocated to participants depends on Mortgage Choice’s performance
against the performance criteria. Any conditional entitlements that participants do not become entitled to at the end of the
performance period (i.e. as the performance condition has not been met in full), will lapse.
The performance requirements and vesting scale applicable to the offers under the PSP during the year ended 30 June
2006 are identical to those specified for the initial offer under the Executive Performance Option Plan.
The rules of the PSP permit the Company to issue new shares or to purchase shares on-market if the performance
requirements are satisfied at the end of the three-year performance period. Participants will not be required to pay for any
shares that may be allocated to them under the PSP. Until the shares are released from the PSP, they will remain subject to
the PSP rules and to the ‘holding lock’ applied pursuant to those rules, and the participant will be restricted in his or her
ability to deal in those shares.
Shares will not be released from the PSP and will remain subject to a holding lock until a Notice of Withdrawal, that has
been approved by the Board, is lodged with the Plan Administrator in respect of them. Once a Notice of Withdrawal is
accepted, the Plan Administrator will release the holding lock in respect of the shares which are the subject of that Notice.
A Notice of Withdrawal may be lodged by a participant following the earlier of:
■ 1 July in the year (being a period commencing 1 July and ending 30 June) that is 10 years after the year in which the
offer is made and is accepted by the participant;
■ the participant ceasing to be an employee of the Company;
■ a ‘capital event’ (generally, a successful takeover offer or scheme of arrangement relating to the Company) occurring; or
■ the date upon which the Board gives its written consent to the lodgement of a Notice of Withdrawal by the participant.
While shares remain subject to the PSP rules, participants will, in general, enjoy the rights attaching to those Shares (such
as voting or dividend rights etc). These rights are not available to participants prior to the performance requirements being
met.
Where a participant ceases to be employed by Mortgage Choice prior to the end of the performance period, other than
because of a ‘qualifying reason’ (i.e. death, total and permanent disability, redundancy, and any other reason determined
by the Board), any conditional entitlements to receive shares will lapse. However, in the event of a change in control of the
Company or if there is cessation of employment due to a ‘qualifying reason’, the Board may determine that some or all of
the shares may be allocated to the participant.
If the Board determines that a participant has acted fraudulently or dishonestly, has committed an act of harassment or
discrimination, is in serious breach of any duty to Mortgage Choice, or, in the Board’s reasonable opinion, has brought
Mortgage Choice into serious disrepute, any shares to which the participant may have become entitled at the end of the
performance period, and any shares held by the participant under the PSP are forfeited by the participant.
71
Mortgage Choice Limited
Notes to the financial statements continued
30 June 2006
If the Board determines that a participant has acted fraudulently or dishonestly, has committed an act of harassment or
discrimination, is in serious breach of any duty to Mortgage Choice, or, in the Board’s reasonable opinion, has brought
Mortgage Choice into serious disrepute, any shares to which the participant may have become entitled at the end of the
performance period, and any shares held by the participant under the PSP are forfeited by the participant.
Details of performance shares in the Company provided as remuneration to each Director and key management personnel
of Mortgage Choice Limited are set out below. Further information on the options is set out in the remuneration report.
Set out below are summaries of performance shares conditionally issued under the plan:
Offer Date
Vesting
date
Value
Balance at
start of
the year
Granted
during the
year
Exercised
during the
year
Expired
during the
year
Forfeited
during the
year
Balance at
end of the
year
Exercisable
at end of
the year
Number
Number
Number
Number
Number
Number
Number
Consolidated and parent entity – 2006
10 August
2004
10 August
2007
6 September
2004
6 September
2007
4 January 2005
4 January
2008
24 February
2005
24 February
2008
2 September
2005
2 September
2008
Total
Weighted
average
exercise price
$1.05
372,500
$1.05
24,800
$0.91
155,707
$1.08
24,500
-
-
-
-
$1.43
-
479,200
577,507
479,200
$1.01
$1.43
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(75,100)
297,400
-
24,800
(37,807)
117,900
-
24,500
(41,600)
437,600
(154,507)
902,200
$1.12
$1.21
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Offer Date
Vesting
date
Value
Balance at
start of
the year
Granted
during the
year
Exercised
during the
year
Expired
during the
year
Forfeited
during the
year
Balance at
end of the
year
Exercisable
at end of
the year
Number
Number
Number
Number
Number
Number
Number
Consolidated and parent entity – 2005
10 August
2004
10 August
2007
6 September
2004
6 September
2007
4 January
2005
4 January
2008
24 February
2005
24 February
2008
$1.05
$1.05
$0.91
$1.08
Total
Weighted
average
exercise price
-
-
-
-
-
-
422,300
56,000
155,707
24,500
658,507
$1.02
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(49,800)
372,500
(31,200)
24,800
-
-
155,707
24,500
(81,000)
577,507
$1.05
$1.01
-
-
-
-
-
-
The weighted average remaining contractual life of performance shares outstanding at the end of the period was 1.70 years
(2005 - 2.25 years).
The assessed fair value at grant date of share rights granted to individuals is allocated equally over the period from grant date to vesting
date, and the amount is included in the remuneration tables above. Fair values at grant date are independently determined using a Monte
Carlo simulation model utilising a Black-Scholes option pricing model framework that takes into account the term of the rights, the vesting
and performance criteria, the impact of dilution, the non-tradeable nature of the rights, the share price at grant date and expected price
volatility of the underlying share, the expected dividend yield and the risk-free interest rate for the term of the share rights.
72
The model inputs for performance shares granted during the year ended 30 June 2006 included:
(a)
share rights are granted for no consideration, each tranche vests and is exercisable after three anniversaries of the date of grant;
(b)
grant date: 2 September 2005;
(c)
expiry date: 2 September 2015;
(d)
share price at grant date: $1.43;
(e)
expected price volatility of the company’s shares: 30.0%;
(f)
expected dividend yield: 6.0%; and
(g)
risk-free interest rate: 5.0%.
(c) Expenses arising from share-based payment transactions
Total expenses arising from share-based payment transactions recognised during the period as part of employee benefit
expense were as follows:
Options issued under EPOP
Shares issues under PSP
Consolidated
Parent entity
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
2006
$’000
2005
$’000
72
180
252
20
71
91
72
180
252
20
71
91
73
Mortgage Choice Limited
Notes to the financial statements continued
30 June 2006
N OT E 33
E X PL A N AT I O N O F T R A NSI T I O N TO AUS T R A L I A N
EQU I VA L EN T S TO I FR S
(1)
Reconciliation of equity reported under previous Australian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(AGAAP) to equity under Australian equivalents to IFRSs (AIFRS)
(a) At the date of transition to AIFRS: 1 July 2004
Consolidated
Effect of
transition
to AIFRS
$’000
Previous
AGAAP
$’000
Notes
AIFRS
$’000
Previous
AGAAP
$’000
Parent entity
Effect of
transition
to AIFRS
$’000
AIFRS
$’000
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Other
Total current assets
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Deferred tax assets
Intangible assets
Total non-current assets
Total assets
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables
Current tax liabilities
Provisions
Other
Total current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Provisions
Other
Total non-current liabilities
Total liabilities
Net assets
EQUITY
Contributed equity
Reserves
Retained earnings/ (accumulated losses)
Total equity
(a)
(a)
11,199
8,289
1,223
20,711
1,862
1,158
-
3,020
23,731
11,461
1,329
503
3,193
16,486
113
270
383
16,869
6,862
8,293
5,349
(6,780)
6,862
-
-
-
-
11,199
11,199
8,289
1,223
8,289
1,223
20,711
20,711
(774)
-
774
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,088
1,158
774
3,020
1,862
1,158
-
3,020
23,731
23,731
11,461
11,461
1,329
503
3,193
1,329
503
3,193
16,486
16,486
113
270
383
113
270
383
16,869
16,869
6,862
6,862
8,293
5,349
8,293
5,349
(6,780)
(6,780)
6,862
6,862
-
-
-
-
(774)
-
774
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
11,199
8,289
1,223
20,711
1,088
1,158
774
3,020
23,731
11,461
1,329
503
3,193
16,486
113
270
383
16,869
6,862
8,293
5,349
(6,780)
6,862
74
(b) At the end of the last reporting period under previous AGAAP: 30 June 2005
Consolidated
Effect of
transition
to AIFRS
$’000
Previous
AGAAP
$’000
Notes
AIFRS
$’000
Previous
AGAAP
$’000
Parent entity
Effect of
transition
to AIFRS
$’000
AIFRS
$’000
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Other
Total current assets
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Deferred tax assets
Intangible assets
Total non-current assets
Total assets
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables
Current tax liabilities
Provisions
Total current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Payables
Provisions
Total non-current liabilities
Total liabilities
Net assets
EQUITY
Contributed equity
Reserves
Retained earnings
Total equity
11,462
9,571
222
21,255
-
-
-
-
11,462
11,462
9,571
222
9,571
222
21,255
21,255
-
-
-
-
(a)
(a)
2,934
1,206
(1,472)
-
-
1,472
1,462
1,206
1,472
4,140
2,934
1,206
(1,472)
-
-
1,472
4,140
4,140
25,395
11,585
3,121
530
15,236
232
144
376
15,612
9,783
81
-
9,702
9,783
(d)
(c)
(c),(d)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
25,395
25,395
11,585
11,585
3,121
530
3,121
530
15,236
15,236
232
144
376
232
144
376
15,612
15,612
9,783
9,783
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
122
91
(213)
-
203
91
9,489
9,783
81
-
9,702
9,783
122
91
(213)
-
11,462
9,571
222
21,255
1,462
1,206
1,472
4,140
25,395
11,585
3,121
530
15,236
232
144
376
15,612
9,783
203
91
9,489
9,783
75
Mortgage Choice Limited
Notes to the financial statements continued
30 June 2006
(2) Reconciliation of profit for the year ended 30 June 2005
Consolidated
Effect of
transition
to AIFRS
$’000
Previous
AGAAP
$’000
Notes
AIFRS
$’000
Previous
AGAAP
$’000
Parent entity
Effect of
transition
to AIFRS
$’000
AIFRS
$’000
108,788
-
108,788
108,788
-
108,788
(b)
1,725
(12)
1,713
1,725
(12)
1,713
(73,831)
(3,824)
(7,648)
(1,836)
(5,141)
(2)
18,231
(b),(c)
(d)
(5,488)
12,743
(73,831)
(73,831)
-
-
-
-
-
(3,824)
(7,648)
(1,836)
(79)
(5,220)
-
(91)
(122)
(213)
(2)
18,140
(5,610)
12,530
(3,824)
(7,648)
(1,836)
(5,141)
(2)
18,231
(5,488)
12,743
-
-
-
-
-
(73,831)
(3,824)
(7,648)
(1,836)
(79)
(5,220)
-
(91)
(122)
(213)
(2)
18,140
(5,610)
12,530
12,743
(213)
12,530
12,743
(213)
12,530
Revenue
Other income
Expenses from continuing operations
Sales
Technology
Marketing
Finance
Corporate
Finance costs
Profit before income tax
Income tax expense
Profit for the year
Net profit attributable to the
members of Mortgage Choice Limited
(3) Reconciliation of cash flow statement for the year ended 30 June 2005
The adoption of AIFRSs has not resulted in any material adjustments to the cash flow statement.
(4) Notes to the reconciliations
(a)
Intangible assets
Under AASB 138 Intangible Assets, computer software is classified as a class of intangible asset. Under previous
AGAAP computer software was classified as a class of property, plant and equipment. The effect of this is:
(i) At 1 July 2004
For the consolidated and parent entity there has been a decrease in property, plant and equipment of $774,000.
Intangible assets has increased by $774,000.
(ii) At 30 June 2005
For the consolidated and parent entity there has been a decrease in property, plant and equipment of
$1,472,000. Intangible assets has increased by $1,472,000.
(iii) For the year ended 30 June 2005
There is no effect on the consolidated and parent entity.
(b) Revenue disclosure in relation to the sale of non-current assets
Under AIFRS the revenue recognised in relation to the sale of non-current assets is the net gain on the sale. Under
previous AGAAP the gross proceeds from the sale are recognised as revenue and the carrying amount of the asset
sold is recognised as an expense. The effect of this is:
(i) At 1 July 2004
There is no effect on the consolidated and parent entity.
(ii) At 30 June 2005
There is no effect on the consolidated and parent entity.
(iii) For the year ended 30 June 2005
For the consolidated and parent entity there has been a reduction in other income of $12,000 and a reduction in
Corporate expenses of $12,000.
76
c)
Share-based payments
Under AASB 2 Share-based Payment from 1 July 2004 the Group is required to recognise an expense for those
options that were issued to employees under the Mortgage Choice Executive Performance Option Plan (EPOP) and
rights issued under the Mortgage Choice Performance Share Plan (PSP) after 7 November 2002 but that had not
vested by 1 January 2005. The effect of this is:
(i) At 1 July 2004
There is no effect on the consolidated and parent entity.
(ii) At 30 June 2005
For the consolidated and parent entity there has been a decrease in retained earnings of $91,000 and a
corresponding increase in reserves.
(iii) For the year ended 30 June 2005
For the consolidated and parent entity there has been an increase in employee benefits expense of $91,000.
(d) Deferred tax liability
Under previous AGAAP income tax expense was calculated by reference to the accounting profit after allowing for
permanent differences. Deferred tax was not recognised in relation to amounts recognised directly in equity. The
adoption of AIFRS has resulted in a change in accounting policy. The application of AASB 112 Income Taxes has
resulted in the recognition of future income tax benefits in relation to IPO costs directly in equity. The effects are as
follows:
(i) At 1 July 2004
There is no effect on the consolidated and parent entity.
(ii) At 30 June 2005
For the consolidated and parent entity there has been an increase in contributed equity of $122,000 and a
corresponding decrease in retained earnings.
(iii) For the year ended 30 June 2005
For the consolidated and parent entity there has been an increase in income tax expense of $122,000.
(e) Retained earnings
The effect on retained earnings of the changes set out above are as follows:
Share-based payments
Deferred tax liability
Total adjustment
Attributable to:
Equity holders of the parent
1 July 2004
30 June 2005
Consolidated
$’000
Parent entity
$’000
Consolidated
$’000
Parent entity
$’000
Notes
(c)
(d)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(91)
(122)
(213)
(91)
(122)
(213)
(213)
(213)
77
Mortgage Choice Limited
Notes to the financial statements continued
30 June 2006
(5)
Adjustments on transition to AASB 132 Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation and
AASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement: 1 July 2005
Consolidated
Parent entity
30 June 2005
$’000
Adjustment
$’000
1 July 2005
$’000
30 June 2005
$’000
Adjustment
$’000
1 July 2005
$’000
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Other
Total current assets
Non-current assets
Receivables
Property, plant and equipment
Deferred tax assets
Intangible assets
Total non-current assets
11,462
9,571
222
-
36,473
-
21,255
36,473
11,462
46,044
222
57,728
11,462
9,571
222
-
36,473
-
21,255
36,473
11,462
46,044
222
57,728
-
90,418
90,418
-
90,418
90,418
1,462
1,206
1,472
4,140
-
-
-
1,462
1,206
1,472
90,418
94,558
1,462
1,206
1,472
4,140
-
-
-
1,462
1,206
1,472
90,418
94,558
Total assets
25,395
126,891
152,286
25,395
126,891
152,286
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables
11,585
20,991
32,576
11,585
20,991
32,576
Current tax liabilities
Provisions
3,121
530
-
-
3,121
530
3,121
530
-
-
3,121
530
Total current liabilities
15,236
20,991
36,227
15,236
20,991
36,227
Non-current liabilities
Payables
Deferred tax liabilities
Provisions
Other
Total non-current liabilities
-
-
144
232
376
Total liabilities
15,612
56,119
14,934
-
-
71,053
92,044
56,119
14,934
144
232
71,429
107,656
-
-
144
232
376
15,612
56,119
14,934
-
-
71,053
92,044
56,119
14,934
144
232
71,429
107,656
Net assets
9,783
34,847
44,630
9,783
34,847
44,630
EQUITY
Contributed equity
Reserves
Retained earnings
Total equity
203
91
9,489
9,783
-
-
34,847
34,847
203
91
44,336
44,630
203
91
9,489
9,783
-
-
34,847
34,847
203
91
44,336
44,630
Refer to notes 10, 11 and 15 for further information on the transition to AASB 132 Financial Instruments: Disclosure and
Presentation and AASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement on 1 July 2005.
78
D I R E C T O R S ’ D E C L A R A T I O N
In the Directors’ opinion:
(a)
the financial statements and notes set out on pages 34 to 78 are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth),
including:
(i)
complying with Accounting Standards, the Corporations Regulations 2001 and other mandatory professional
reporting requirements; and
(ii)
giving a true and fair view of the Company’s and consolidated entity’s financial position as at 30 June 2006 and
of its performance, as represented by the results of their operations, changes in equity and their cash flows, for
the financial year ended on that date; and
(b)
there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due
and payable; and
(c)
the audited remuneration disclosures set out on pages 25 to 28 of the Directors’ report comply with Accounting
Standard AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures and the Corporations Regulations 2001.
The directors have been given the declarations by the chief executive officer and chief financial officer required by section 295A
of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
This declaration is made in accordance with a resolution of the Directors.
Peter Ritchie
Director
Sydney
23 August 2006
79
Independent audit report to the members of
Mortgage Choice Limited
PricewaterhouseCoopers
ABN 52 780 433 757
Darling Park Tower 2
201 Sussex Street
GPO BOX 2650
SYDNEY NSW 1171
DX 77 Sydney
Australia
www.pwc.com/au
Telephone +61 2 8266 0000
Facsimile +61 2 8266 9999
Matters relating to the electronic presentation of the audited
financial report
This audit report relates to the financial report and remuneration disclosures of Mortgage Choice
Limited (the Company) and the Mortgage Choice Group (defined below) for the financial year
ended 30 June 2006 included on Mortgage Choice Limited’s web site. The Company’s directors
are responsible for the integrity of the Mortgage Choice Limited web site. We have not been
engaged to report on the integrity of this web site. The audit report refers only to the financial
report and remuneration disclosures identified below. It does not provide an opinion on any other
information which may have been hyperlinked to/from the financial report or the remuneration
disclosures. If users of this report are concerned with the inherent risks arising from electronic data
communications they are advised to refer to the hard copy of the audited financial report and
remuneration disclosures to confirm the information included in the audited financial report and
remuneration disclosures presented on this web site.
Audit opinion
In our opinion:
1.
the financial report of Mortgage Choice Limited:
�
�
gives a true and fair view, as required by the Corporations Act 2001 in Australia, of the
financial position of Mortgage Choice Limited and the Mortgage Choice Group (defined
below) as at 30 June 2006, and of their performance for the year ended on that date, and
is presented in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, Accounting Standards and
other mandatory financial reporting requirements in Australia, and the Corporations
Regulations 2001, and
2.
the remunerations disclosures that are contained in section 13 of the directors’ report comply
with Accounting Standard AASB 124 Related Party Disclosures (AASB 124) and the
Corporations Regulations 2001.
This opinion must be read in conjunction with the rest of our audit report.
Scope
The financial report, remunerations disclosures and directors’ responsibility
The financial report comprises the balance sheet, income statement, cash flow statements,
statement of changes in equity, accompanying notes to the financial statements, and the directors’
declaration for both Mortgage Choice Limited (the company) and the Mortgage Choice Group (the
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
80
consolidated entity), for the year ended 30 June 2006. The consolidated entity comprises both the
company and the entities it controlled during that year.
The company has disclosed information about the remuneration of directors and executives
(remuneration disclosures) as required by AASB 124, under the heading “remuneration report” in
section 13 of the directors’ report, as permitted by the Corporations Regulations 2001.
The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation and true and fair presentation of
the financial report in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 This includes responsibility for
the maintenance of adequate accounting records and internal controls that are designed to prevent
and detect fraud and error, and for the accounting policies and accounting estimates inherent in the
financial report. The directors are also responsible for the remuneration disclosures contained in
the directors’ report.
Audit approach
We conducted an independent audit in order to express an opinion to the members of the company.
Our audit was conducted in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards, in order to provide
reasonable assurance as to whether the financial report is free of material misstatement and the
remuneration disclosures comply with AASB 124 and the Corporations Regulations 2001. The
nature of an audit is influenced by factors such as the use of professional judgement, selective
testing, the inherent limitations of internal control, and the availability of persuasive rather than
conclusive evidence. Therefore, an audit cannot guarantee that all material misstatements have
been detected. For further explanation of an audit, visit our website
http://www.pwc.com/au/financialstatementaudit.
We performed procedures to assess whether in all material respects the financial report presents
fairly, in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, Accounting Standards and other mandatory
financial reporting requirements in Australia, a view which is consistent with our understanding of
the company’s and the consolidated entity’s financial position, and of their performance as
represented by the results of their operations, changes in equity and cash flows. We also performed
procedures to assess whether the remuneration disclosures comply with AASB 124 and the
Corporations Regulations 2001.
We formed our audit opinion on the basis of these procedures, which included:
�
�
examining, on a test basis, information to provide evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial report and remuneration disclosures, and
assessing the appropriateness of the accounting policies and disclosures used and the
reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by the directors.
Our procedures include reading the other information in the Annual Report to determine whether it
contains any material inconsistencies with the financial report.
While we considered the effectiveness of management’s internal controls over financial reporting
when determining the nature and extent of our procedures, our audit was not designed to provide
assurance on internal controls.
Our audit did not involve an analysis of the prudence of business decisions made by directors or
management.
81
Independence
In conducting our audit, we followed applicable independence requirements of Australian
professional ethical pronouncements and the Corporations Act 2001.
PricewaterhouseCoopers
Andrew Sneddon
Partner
Sydney
23 August 2006
82
S H A R E H O L D E R I N F O R M A T I O N
The shareholder information set out below was applicable as at 11 September 2006.
A . DIS T RI BU T I O N O F EQU I T Y SECU RI T I ES
Analysis of numbers of equity security holders by size of holding:
1 – 1,000
1,001 – 5,000
5,001 – 10,000
10,001 – 100,000
100,001 and over
Class of equity security
Ordinary Shares
Options
Conditional
entitlements
123
483
224
184
47
1,061
1
3
4
1
20
1
22
There were 8 holders of less than a marketable parcel of ordinary shares.
B. EQU I T Y SECURI T Y HO L DER S
Twenty largest quoted equity security holders
The names of the twenty largest holders of quoted equity securities are listed below:
J P Morgan Nominees Australia Limited
National Nominees Limited
R G Higgins
Ochoa Pty Ltd
Basscave Pty Limited
ANZ Nominees Limited
Westpac Custodian Nominees Limited
SCJ Pty Ltd atf Jermyn Family Trust
RBC Dexia Investor Services Australia Nominees Pty Limited
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above