More annual reports from Mortgage Choice Limited:
2019 ReportPeers and competitors of Mortgage Choice Limited:
Home Capital Group2015 Annual Report
Contents
2015 performance 
Chairman’s Letter 
Chief Executive Officer’s Report 
2015 Financial Report 
Shareholder Information 
Corporate Directory 
page 2
3
4
9
92
96
Stephen Lemm, franchise owner of Mortgage Choice in 
Neutral Bay, discusses financial options with a happy 
Mortgage Choice customer.
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 2015
1
Established in 1992, Mortgage 
Choice is traditionally known for 
providing expert home loan advice to 
Australians, helping them to obtain 
and manage a home loan. But these 
days we offer more than just home 
loan advice. 
In addition to helping in excess of 40,000 borrowers a 
year obtain property financing, our network of specialist 
mortgage brokers also help customers to source credit 
cards, car loans, commercial loans, asset finance, deposit 
bonds, and risk and general insurances. Our brokers also 
refer customers to our growing network of Mortgage 
Choice financial advisers, who are committed to the 
concept of driving ‘real, relevant results’ for everyday 
Australians putting them on the right financial path.
Our network of franchises right across Australia all operate 
with a single vision – to help customers achieve their 
financial and home ownership goals via expert advice and 
great service.
2
2015 performance
2015 
performance
NPAT cash – 
$18.6 million 
FY15
Mortgage Choice loan book $bn
)
s
n
o
i
l
l
i
b
$
(
$41.4bn
2011
$43.6bn
2012
$45.3bn
2013
$47.4bn
2014
$49.5bn
2015
Year
Total settlements $bn
Funds under advice and In force premium
)
s
n
o
i
l
l
i
b
$
(
$8.3bn
2011
$8.7bn
2012
$8.8bn
2013
$10.4bn
2014
$11.5bn
2015
Year
Funds under advice
In force premium
)
s
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
$
(
e
c
i
v
d
a
r
e
d
n
u
s
d
n
u
F
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
)
s
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
$
(
i
m
u
m
e
r
p
e
c
r
o
f
n
I
Jul-14
A u g-14
Sep-14
O ct-14
N o v-14
D ec-14
Ja n-15
Feb-15
M ar-15
A pr-15
M ay-15
Ju n-15
Total dividends ¢
Others  
2.2%
HMC 
3.1%
Financial 
planning 
3.2%
Diversifi ed
products 
3.6%
Gross revenue 
by division
)
s
t
n
e
C
(
MC
Broking 
87.9%
13.0 c
2011
13.0 c
2012
13.0 c
2013
Year
15.5 c
2014
15.5 c
2015
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 2015
3
Chairman’s 
Letter
On behalf of the Board, I am pleased to announce that 
Mortgage Choice has delivered another robust financial 
result this year. 
In the last 12 months, we have managed to grow our 
loan book 4.6% to $49.5 billion and settle $11.5 billion 
worth of home loans – up 10.6% on the previous year. 
Financial results for the year to 30 June 2015 showed a 
net cash profit after tax of $18.6 million – which is largely 
in line with last year’s performance. 
We also managed to grow our loan writer, franchisee 
and financial adviser numbers this year, which helped 
us to take advantage of the opportunities presented by 
the strong market. 
All in all, FY15 was a fairly strong year for Mortgage 
Choice as a whole. We continued our transition into 
a fully-fledged financial services hub, taking our 
percentage of gross revenue from diversified sources 
from 9.5% to 12.1%. 
FY15 was also the year we said a fond farewell to chief 
executive officer Michael Russell. 
Michael was a true advocate for Mortgage Choice. During 
his six year tenure, Michael helped transform Mortgage 
Choice from a mortgage broker to an ASX300, fully-
fledged financial services company that has cemented 
itself as one of Australia’s most loved financial services 
brands. 
It was Michael’s vision, drive and determination that 
ultimately helped Mortgage Choice take the next step in 
its evolution. 
Given that the financial needs of customers are ever 
evolving, Michael saw an opportunity to further 
diversify Mortgage Choice’s core services so that we may 
better cater to our customers’ growing needs.
Since getting our Australian Financial Services Licence 
in 2013, Mortgage Choice has built a unique and new 
generational financial advice business from the ground 
up, giving our customers access to clear and transparent 
advice that is both affordable and relevant. 
Today, we have 45 advisers on board and 34 Mortgage 
Choice Financial Planning franchises, and remain as 
committed as ever to introducing additional best of 
breed advisers into the business over the months and 
years ahead. 
Mortgage Choice has enjoyed another 
strong financial result, growing our 
loan book and delivering our best 
ever settlement result. We are pleased 
to pay shareholders a final dividend 
of 8 cents per share, taking the full 
year dividend to 15.5 cents per share 
fully franked. 
P E T E R   R I T C H I E ,   C H A I R M A N
I know I speak on behalf of everyone at Mortgage Choice 
when I say that we are all grateful for Michael Russell’s 
contribution to the business. 
Michael announced his planned departure early, giving 
us the opportunity to conduct a thorough search for our 
new leader. With that said, it gives me great pleasure to 
announce the appointment of John Flavell as the new 
chief executive officer of Mortgage Choice.
Armed with more than 20 years’ experience in executive 
leadership positions and 15 years in financial services, 
John brings a wealth of experience to the role. 
John’s broad financial services experience incorporating 
lending, broking, third party distribution and wealth 
management, means he is ideally placed to lead 
Mortgage Choice to further growth in the financial 
services sector.
I know John is focused on building a sustainable 
Mortgage Choice by focusing on what matters most 
to our customers – honest, trustworthy advice and 
amazing customer service. John, together with the rest 
of the Mortgage Choice network, will deliver this by 
offering a broad range of tailored financial solutions and 
offering our customers true choice as well as transparent 
and trustworthy advice. 
His first 90 days have been a tremendous success and 
I look forward to seeing what Mortgage Choice’s future 
holds under John’s stewardship. 
4
CEO’s Report
CEO Overview
The economic environment in the 2015 financial year 
was varied.
In May, the Federal Government tried to make up for its 
2014 ‘tough Budget’, by delivering a relatively benign 
Budget that would help improve consumer sentiment. 
The future looks bright for Mortgage 
Choice as we continue our transition 
into a customer centric, omni-channel, 
integrated financial services company. 
The Budget achieved its intended result, with 
consumer sentiment showing signs of improvement 
in the days following. However, the improvement 
in confidence was short lived, and by the end of the 
financial year, confidence had fallen below long term 
averages to the point where pessimists significantly 
outnumbered optimists.  
While consumer confidence took a tumble, there 
was plenty of good news coming out of the 
Australian economy.
In the second half of FY15, the Reserve Bank of Australia 
cut the official cash rate twice (in February and May), 
positively driving increases in property demand and 
dwelling values. 
Across the combined capital cities, dwelling values were 
up 9.8% for the 2015 financial year, with Sydney and 
Melbourne the standout performers recording annual 
growth of 16.2% and 10.2% respectively. 
At the same time, Mortgage Choice’s core broking 
business recorded its best ever settlements result, 
settling in excess of $11.5 billion in home loans.
Mortgage Choice’s Group Net Profit After Tax (NPAT) on a 
cash basis was $18.6 million, which was largely in-line 
with last year’s result, when the Group recorded a NPAT 
cash result of $18.8 million. 
The slight fall in the NPAT cash result could largely be 
attributed to the Help Me Choose business failing to 
perform in line with expectations. In the first half of FY15, 
Mortgage Choice significantly increased the resource 
levels at Help Me Choose to take advantage of the 
seasonal upswing in business opportunities that usually 
exist over the last quarter of the financial year.
J O H N   F L AV E L L ,   C H I E F   E X E C U T I V E   O F F I C E R
The uplift in new business was insufficient to cover 
the higher resourcing costs incurred in the first half of 
the year.
Beyond the soft results for Help Me Choose, 
Mortgage Choice incurred two one-off expenses 
throughout FY15: a $1.2 million impairment charge 
relating to our Project One technology initiative, and a 
one-off expense relating to our Plus One initiative. 
In January 2014, Mortgage Choice launched a Plus One 
initiative to grow the amount of loan writers across the 
network. Under the terms of the initiative, franchisees 
were offered a monetary incentive to recruit and 
on-board a new loans consultant by September 2014 – 
the associated costs of which were incorporated into the 
FY15 expenses. 
As a result of the initiative, Mortgage Choice grew its 
number of loan writers by 68, making the program a 
great success. 
The one-off costs associated with our Plus One and 
Project One initiatives ultimately reduced Mortgage 
Choice’s Net Profit After Tax (NPAT) cash result. 
If these expenses were excluded, Mortgage Choice’s FY15 
cash NPAT result would have been stronger than FY14. 
In the context of the dynamic economic environment, 
Mortgage Choice’s FY15 financial results were fair, 
although significant opportunity exists to deliver 
stronger results over the coming years. 
I joined Mortgage Choice on 7 April this year and 
officially commenced in the role of chief executive officer 
on 23 April. 
Mortgage Choice is a company that is very well known 
to me, having worked as a competitor to the Group for a 
number of years, and as a business partner for the last 
nine years. Knowing the business as I did, I was always 
very confident that Mortgage Choice was well positioned 
to continue to deliver value to the Group’s customers, 
business growth for franchisees, career opportunities for 
employees and strong returns to shareholders. 
I was also confident that with my significant experience 
in financial services, deep industry knowledge 
and leadership skills I could make a very valuable 
contribution to Mortgage Choice as chief executive 
officer. Accordingly, I made it very clear to the former 
CEO, Michael Russell, over four years ago, that when the 
time was right I would be keen to step into the role. It 
was obviously very pleasing to see this come to fruition.
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 2015
5
400,000
Mortgage Choice has helped more 
than 400,000 Australians realise 
their property and finance goals.
There is not another Group in the industry that is as 
professional, capable and dedicated to delivering value 
to their customers.
Throughout its 23 years of operation, Mortgage Choice 
has become a household brand that is well known for 
providing trusted, expert mortgage advice and value to 
its customers.
Mortgage Choice has helped more than 400,000 
Australians realise their property and finance related 
goals and enabled hundreds of Australians to build 
profitable small businesses, creating employment for 
many thousands of others. 
This is a business that certainly has the opportunity to 
go from strength to strength. 
6
CEO’s Report
During my first 100 days as chief executive officer, 
I have been given the opportunity to closely observe 
the business operations through engaging with 
our franchisees, group office staff and other key 
stakeholders. This process has not only allowed me to 
cultivate a clear understanding of the strengths and 
weaknesses of the business, but provided me with 
clarity and confidence as to where opportunities exist 
for the future. 
Taking the same professional approach and applying that 
to deliver a broader range of solutions to our customers 
is an incredible opportunity for the Group. We have 
the ability to take what we know about the home loan 
market and the way people like to interact with us and 
apply it to many different financial services. While we 
have already started to do this through the integration 
of the financial planning arm, we have the opportunity 
to create a company that can meet even more of our 
customers’ growing financial needs by delivering any 
financial service through any channel at any time. 
Our goal is to turn this opportunity into a reality by 2020, 
and we will do this by: 
  Creating an omni-channel customer experience;
  Developing and delivering a broader range 
of products;
  Growing our distribution channel including broker 
and adviser numbers; and
  Creating a customer-centric culture. 
At Mortgage Choice, we are advocates for the diversified 
business model because we understand that 1 plus 1 
can equal something more than 2 for our customers and 
stakeholders. As such, we will continue to concentrate 
on developing a multi-channel, multi-service hub 
that successfully caters to our customers’ growing 
financial needs. 
While our future direction is clear, it is also important for 
us to identify our imperatives for the coming 12 months. 
Strategic focus for FY16
For Mortgage Choice, success in FY16 will be measured 
against four key metrics:
  Growth in franchisee revenue;
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 2015
7
  Integration of Mortgage Choice Financial 
Planning (MCFP);
  Profitable market share growth; and 
  Growth in net profit.
To achieve these outcomes we have identified three 
short term priorities for the business. 
Our first priority is to increase brand awareness and, in 
turn, home loan lead volumes to the network.
Growth in brand awareness and subsequent home loan 
lead volumes was very strong over Q4 FY15. We will 
continue this momentum with a full program of national 
promotion and local collaborative marketing initiatives 
to commence 1 September.
We see significant opportunities in the home loan 
space. Data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics 
shows the total value of dwelling commitments written 
each month across Australia has climbed 33% over the 
last two years. And, with dwelling values climbing 
higher across some key markets and property demand 
remaining strong, it is likely that the value of the home 
loan market will continue to grow over FY16.
Our second priority is to increase the footprint and 
productivity of the network. We will improve our 
productivity by leveraging off the efficiencies provided 
33%
The value of dwelling 
commitments written each 
month has climbed 33% over the 
last 2 years.
to us by our new Customer Relationship Management 
platform, and grow our broker numbers by putting a 
spotlight on recruitment. 
Our third and final short term priority involves 
increasing the number of home loan customers referred 
to a Mortgage Choice financial adviser. 
Our MCFP business remains a key focus for Mortgage 
Choice. While referrals to Mortgage Choice Financial 
Planning are up year on year, there is still a significant 
opportunity for us in this space. 
Looking at our data we can see that we have 
barely scratched the surface in terms of capacity. 
Approximately 10% of our new customers in the last 
financial year were referred to a Mortgage Choice 
financial adviser. Our focus will now turn to the 90% 
8
CEO’s Report
of our customers who aren’t being referred, as well as 
our existing customers.
We see significant opportunity in the insurance and 
superannuation markets – opportunities which we 
are well placed to capitalise on through our financial 
planning arm. 
For 2016 and beyond we will continue to invest in the 
business for growth, while ensuring gross profits grow 
at a faster rate than expenses – delivering positive jaws. 
SPOTLIGHT ON
Mortgage Choice’s 
Social Commitment
Through numerous fundraising activities Mortgage Choice has 
raised over $500,000 for Ronald McDonald House Charities 
since partnering with them in October 2011. Mortgage Choice 
donates a fixed dollar amount per loan settled. Our staff and 
franchise network also passionately and actively volunteer 
their time and donate funds to this wonderful charity. 
456
Mortgage Choice’s total 
franchise numbers grew 
5% in FY15 to 456.
The performance of Help Me Choose was not as it should 
have been and it will be addressed as a priority.
The future direction of Mortgage Choice is clear: we will 
become a customer centric, omni-channel, integrated 
financial services company that meets our customers’ 
growing financial needs by delivering expert advice via 
their preferred distribution channel. 
We will deliver any product through any channel at any 
time in a customer’s lifecycle. 
I am excited about the year ahead and know great 
things await Mortgage Choice. Everything we do has the 
customer at the centre. We will continue to build long 
term relationships with our customers and provide them 
with the solutions, knowledge and choices they need to 
be able to make informed financial decisions and live a 
life of abundance.  
2015 Financial Report
Contents
Directors’ Report 
Auditor’s Independence Declaration 
Consolidated Income Statement 
page 10
40
41
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income  42
Consolidated Balance Sheet 
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity 
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows 
Notes to the Financial Statements 
Directors’ Declaration 
Independent Auditor’s Report 
43
44
45
46
89
90
10
Directors’ Report
Your Directors present their report on the consolidated 
entity consisting of Mortgage Choice Limited (“the 
Company”) and the entities it controlled at the end of, or 
during, the year ended 30 June 2015, hereafter referred 
to as “Mortgage Choice”, “the Mortgage Choice Group” or 
“the Group”.
Directors
The following persons were Directors of Mortgage Choice 
Limited during the whole of the financial year and up to 
the date of this report:
P D Ritchie
S J Clancy
P G Higgins
R G Higgins
S C Jermyn
D E Ralston
Principal activities
During the year the principal continuing activity of the 
Mortgage Choice Group was mortgage broking. This 
activity involves:
  the provision of assistance in determining the 
borrowing capacities of prospective borrowers;
  the assessment, at the request of those 
borrowers, of a wide range of home loan or other 
products; and
  the submission of loan applications on behalf of 
prospective borrowers.
Dividends
Dividends paid or payable to members during the 
financial year are as follows:
A final ordinary dividend of $9.911 million (8.0 cents 
per fully paid share) was declared for the year 
ended 30 June 2014 on 21 August 2014 and paid on 
15 September 2014.
An interim ordinary dividend of $9.316 million (7.5 cents 
per fully paid share) was declared for the half-year 
ended 31 December 2014 on 24 February 2015 and paid on 
19 March 2015.
A final ordinary dividend of $9.945 million (8.0 cents per 
fully paid share) was declared for the year ended 30 June 
2015 on 18 August 2015 to be paid on 10 September 2015.
Corporate Governance Statement
The Company’s Corporate Governance Statement can be 
found at http://www.mortgagechoice.com.au/about-us/
shareholder-centre/corporate-governance.
Review of Operations
A review of the Group’s operations is set out in the 
Operating and Financial Review below.
Operating and Financial Review
2014/15 was a year of mixed results for Mortgage Choice. 
The core business performed well, recording its best ever 
settlement results as well as strong loan book growth. In 
total, $11.5 billion in residential mortgages were settled, 
while the loan book reached $49.5 billion. 
But while the core broking business performed in 
line with expectations, the Group lost some ground 
in comparison to FY14 on a cash Net Profit After Tax 
(NPAT) basis. 
Another strong financial result
Mortgage Choice sought to take advantage of the 
opportunities associated with the strong home loan 
market, adding 68 loan writers and 28 franchises to the 
network since January 2014. 
The extra loan writers and franchisees helped Mortgage 
Choice to lift its settlement and approval figures by 10.6% 
and 10.2% respectively. 
Settlements trend
)
s
n
o
i
l
l
i
m
$
(
1,100
1,000
900
800
700
600
500
Monthly settlements ($m)
6 month average settlements ($m)
Sep-12
D ec-12
M ar-13
Ju n-13
Sep-13
D ec-13
M ar-14
Ju n-14
Sep-14
D ec-14
M ar-15
Ju n-15
But while growth in settlements and approvals was 
strong, Mortgage Choice’s market share fell slightly. To 
rectify this issue heading into FY16, Mortgage Choice will 
continue to focus on strategic recruitment. 
Directors’ ReportFor the year ended 30 June 2015 
11
This year, we achieved yet another strong underlying 
statutory result, before the recognition of balance sheet 
revaluation adjustments to the valuation of the loan 
book. Underlying statutory revenue and profit before tax 
compared to last year was up 9% on revenue and 1% on 
profit before tax.
“Dwelling commitments hit 
a five year high in April 2015. 
More than 53,000 home loans 
were approved over the course 
of April 2015 – a level not seen 
since October 2009.”
Underlying Statutory Results
30 June 2015 
$’000
30 June 2014 
$’000
Operating Revenue
Underlying operating 
revenue
Adjustment to valuation 
of loan book receivable
191,587
175,055
(6,792)
3,409
Total operating revenue
184,795
178,464
Profit before tax
Underlying result 
before tax
Adjustment to valuation 
to net loan book 
receivable
28,801
28,434
(2,293)
(1,638)
Total profit before tax
26,508
26,796
However, the realignment of valuation assumptions to 
reflect changing economic factors resulted in a negative 
valuation adjustment at the end of the year. Increased 
run-off was experienced across the industry due in 
part to customers paying more off their principal in the 
low interest rate environment. A second factor was the 
high number of customers who refinanced or upgraded 
their homes, contributing to Mortgage Choice’s record 
growth in loan settlements. Increased settlement 
volumes also led to higher commission payments to 
Mortgage Choice franchisees, which affected our net 
margin. The combination of these factors resulted in a 
write down of 2% of the ending value of the Company’s 
loan book. 
Broker usage growing in buoyant market
The market for home loans grew to new heights in 
FY15, with data from the Australian Bureau of Statistics 
showing dwelling commitments hitting a five year 
high in April 2015. More than 53,000 home loans were 
approved over the course of April 2015 – a level not seen 
since October 2009 when the boosted first home owner 
grants were coming to an end.
At the same time, data from the Mortgage and 
Finance Association of Australia shows the third 
party distribution channel is growing, with mortgage 
brokers now accounting for 52% of all loans written. It is 
expected that broker usage will continue to grow as the 
home loan environment becomes increasingly complex. 
In recent months, many of Australia’s lenders have 
made policy and pricing changes to their suite of home 
loans, specifically their investment products. These 
changes are making the home loan environment more 
complex, encouraging more potential and existing 
property buyers to seek out expert advice, which should 
bode well for the broker proposition. 
Already, Mortgage Choice is starting to see an uplift in 
broker demand, which is resulting in increased home 
loan submissions and settlements. 
In FY15, Mortgage Choice’s loan book kept pace with the 
boost in settlements, in spite of the increased rate of 
run-off. As at 31 July 2015, Mortgage Choice’s residential 
loan book stood at $49.15 billion while its total loan book 
(including residential, commercial loans and reverse 
mortgages) reached $49.5 billion.
Residential loan book ($’000)
50
40
30
20
10
0
2
4
1
,
6
7
0
9
3
,
5
4
4
,
3
3
0
6
3
,
,
0
7
8
8
6
2
,
3
3
1
4
4
,
4
4
6
9
2
,
,
0
3
0
6
9
6
,
5
2
3
1
9
,
3
9
6
,
1
2
0
1
3
,
8
8
6
,
7
1
,
4
0
0
9
4
1
,
9
4
7
9
1
,
1
1
0
,
7
4
9
7
8
,
2
6
1
,
1
4
6
4
4
,
9
9
2
,
3
4
7
6
1
,
1
8
9
,
4
4
20 0 4
20 05
20 0 6
20 07
20 0 8
20 0 9
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Financial Year
Total growth for the residential 
loan book over the course 
of FY15 was 4.6% – up from 
$47 billion in FY14. 
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201512
MC retains dividend
Growth in the core business combined with 
improvements across the diversified revenue streams 
allowed Mortgage Choice to maintain its dividend result 
from FY14. For the second consecutive year, Mortgage 
Choice has delivered total dividends of 15.5 cents.
Mortgage Choice Financial Planning
Growth in revenue for Mortgage Choice Financial 
Planning was up 107% over the course of the 
financial year, while adviser numbers hit 45, which is 
a good result. 
We envisage this business will start to break even on a 
monthly basis in 2H16. 
Mortgage Choice Financial Planning continues to play 
a pivotal role in the future strategy and success of the 
Group as a whole. We see significant opportunity in the 
insurance and superannuation markets – opportunities 
which we are well placed to capitalise on through our 
financial planning arm. 
Mortgage Choice believes that synergies can be created 
for our franchisees, customers and stakeholders, 
provided the business is run strategically. 
Over the past 12 months, Mortgage Choice Financial 
Planning has seen an uplift in the number of brokers 
actively referring customers to advisers climbing by 
106% and the number of customers being referred to a 
Mortgage Choice financial adviser by 236%. Throughout 
FY16, more emphasis will be placed on growing the 
number of brokers who actively refer customers as 
well as the number of customers who are referred to 
an adviser.
Diversified services
Throughout FY15, the percentage of gross revenue 
from diversification grew, reaching 12.1% from 9.5% the 
year prior. 
This growth comes at a time when Mortgage Choice 
has grown its broking commissions from increased 
settlements. In other words, Mortgage Choice has 
managed to grow our diversified revenue streams while 
still growing our core broking business. 
Help Me Choose
Help Me Choose (HMC) turned a less than profitable 
result over the financial year, with the company losing 
$384,000 on a Net Profit After Tax IFRS basis. This result 
is a reflection of Mortgage Choice’s decision to grow 
HMC’s headcount at the beginning of FY15 in order 
to capitalise on the seasonal uplift that is usually 
prevalent in the second half of the financial year. 
Unfortunately, the opportunities weren’t there this 
year and HMC was unable to recoup the costs spent on 
increased headcount. 
Mortgage Choice management has made it clear that 
the HMC financial result will be addressed as a matter 
of urgency. 
Investing for future growth
We undertook several initiatives this year to lay the 
foundations for future success. In particular, we 
reinvigorated the Mortgage Choice brand by refreshing 
the logo. 
Refreshing the Mortgage Choice Brand
Launched in the first half of FY15, the new logo and 
branding reflects a new direction for the company, with 
the symbol representing growth and the complementary 
colours highlighting the company’s diversification.
For the rebranding initiative to be successful, we needed 
significant franchisee buy-in. To date, approx 40% of all 
Mortgage Choice shop fronts have been rebranded. 
Project One – Phase one on time and on budget
In addition to refreshing the Mortgage Choice look and 
feel, we initiated the replacement of our core broker 
platform with the launch of Project One. 
Project One is a two phase initiative that involves 
the implementation of an enterprise-wide, trusted, 
off-the-shelf customer relationship management (CRM) 
platform as well as an industry leading broker front 
end. They will combine to provide our franchisees a 
web-based platform with functionality to improve their 
processes as well as the customer experience. 
Phase one, which involved the implementation of a 
more robust, marketing friendly CRM platform has 
now been completed both on time and on budget. At 
the completion of phase one, we reached a natural 
‘pausing point’ which we are using to take stock of the 
changes made. The changes have presented us with 
an opportunity to evolve and improve our customer 
marketing capabilities – an opportunity we will look 
to capitalise on before moving into phase two. As 
such, phase two, which was originally forecast to be 
rolled out throughout the first half of FY16, will be 
left on pause until such a time that phase one has 
been integrated into every broker business and every 
opportunity gleaned. 
While the majority of the expenses associated with 
Project One formed part of Mortgage Choice’s capital 
expenditure, the business was required to recognise a 
one-off $1.2 million IT impairment charge in FY15, which 
increased our expenses and reduced our cash profits. 
Plus One 
In January 2014, Mortgage Choice launched a Plus 
One initiative to grow the number of loan writers in 
the business. 
Directors’ ReportFor the year ended 30 June 201513
As part of the Plus One initiative, franchisees were 
offered a monetary incentive to bring a new loans 
consultant into their business. 
Under the terms of the initiative, loan writers had to be 
recruited and on-boarded by September 2014. As a result, 
some of the one-off costs incurred from this initiative 
were incorporated into our FY15 expenses and will not 
recur in FY16. 
Since the initiative was first launched, Mortgage Choice 
has grown its loan writer count by 68, which helped 
the business to better take advantage of the strong 
market opportunities. 
Financial Results wrap-up
The non-recurring expenses incurred through both 
the Project One and the Plus One initiatives increased 
Mortgage Choice’s expenses for the year and reduced our 
cash profits. 
Despite the non-recurring expenses and HMC’s sluggish 
result, Mortgage Choice managed to return a profit 
similar to last year and maintain the dividend. 
Addressing the ongoing profitability of Help Me Choose 
is another short term priority for the business.
Looking further ahead, growing Mortgage Choice’s 
distribution channels, creating an omni-channel 
customer experience, a broader range of products and 
building a customer-centric culture are all on the agenda, 
with a completion date set for 2020. 
Significant changes in the state of affairs
Except for the matters disclosed in the Review of 
Operations section of this annual report, there have 
been no significant changes in the state of affairs of 
the Group.
Matters subsequent to the end of the 
financial year
No matters or circumstances have arisen since 
30 June 2015 that have significantly affected, or may 
significantly affect:
(a)  the Group’s operations in future financial years,
(b)  the results of those operations in future financial 
New CEO appointed
years, or
(c)  the Group’s state of affairs in future financial years.
Likely developments and expected results 
of operations
Information on likely developments in the operations of 
the Group and the expected results of operations have 
not been included in this report because the Directors 
believe it would be likely to result in unreasonable 
prejudice to the Group.
Environmental regulation
The Group is not subject to any significant environmental 
regulation under a law of the Commonwealth or of a 
State or Territory in respect of its activities.
In FY15, Mortgage Choice welcomed our new chief 
executive officer, John Flavell. 
Mr Flavell, who officially took over the role of chief 
executive officer on 23 April 2015, joined the company 
with more than 20 years management experience and 
15 years financial services experience. 
In his role as chief executive officer, John Flavell is 
committed to helping the Company take the next step in 
its evolution. 
Strategic focus for 2016 and beyond
Throughout FY15, Mortgage Choice continued its 
transition toward becoming a diversified retail financial 
services player. 
In FY16, Mortgage Choice will continue to focus our 
energies on growing the business as a whole – focusing 
on our core mortgage broking business as well as our 
diversified ventures. 
Short term priorities for the business include the 
development of new strategies to grow broker numbers, 
and the ongoing management of expenses. 
Growing home loan lead volumes is also on the agenda, 
with a key focus on reducing cost per lead. More time 
will be committed to embedding our new CRM to further 
enhance the productivity of the business. 
With regards to financial planning, Mortgage Choice 
is focused on developing strategies that allow us to 
increase the number of home loan customers referred to 
our advisers. 
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201514
Information on Directors
Peter Ritchie
AO, Hon.DBus, BCom, FCPA
Independent Non-Executive 
Chairman
Chairman of nomination and 
remuneration committees
Director since 5 April 2004
Peter has been Chairman 
of Reverse Corp Limited 
since 1999. He previously 
served as Managing 
Director of McDonald’s 
Australia from 1974 to 1995 and as its Chairman from 
1995 to 2001. Peter was deputy Chairman of Seven Group 
Holdings from April 2010 to November 2014 and was a 
Director of Westpac Banking Corporation from 1993 to 
2002 and Solution 6 Holdings from 2000 to 2002. Age 73.
Sean Clancy
Dip Mkt FAICD
Independent Non-Executive 
Director
Member of audit, 
remuneration and 
nomination committees
Director since 18 May 2009
With a sales and 
marketing background 
across many industries 
including banking, fast 
moving consumer goods, liquor, pharmacy, consumer 
electronics, telecommunications and hardware, Sean 
brings a diverse range of knowledge and expertise to the 
Mortgage Choice Board. He is also on the Advisory Board 
of the Port Adelaide Football Club and Director and Chief 
Executive Officer of Transfusion Ltd, Chairman and Non-
Executive Director of Metropolis Inc. and Ambassador to 
Business Events Sydney. Age 55.
Peter Higgins
Non-Executive Director
Member of audit committee
Director since  
30 November 1989
Peter is co-founder 
of Mortgage Choice. 
He also is Executive 
Chairman of technology 
company Power & Data 
Corporation Pty Ltd, 
trading as Mainlinepower.com and a Director of Argosy 
Agricultural Group Pty Ltd. Having been successfully 
self-employed for over 30 years, Peter is an investor in 
a diverse number of industries covering manufacturing, 
agriculture, technology, property and finance. Age 55.
Rodney Higgins
Non-Executive Director
Member of nomination and 
remuneration committees
Director since  
30 January 1986
Rodney is co-founder 
of Mortgage Choice. 
With a background 
in residential and 
commercial property, 
sales and leasing, he has 
been a Director of companies involved in manufacturing, 
wholesaling, importing, retailing and finance. Age 60.
Steven Jermyn
FCPA
Independent Non-Executive 
Director
Chairman of audit committee
Director since 24 May 2004
Steve joined McDonald’s 
Australia in 1984 and 
joined the Board of 
Directors in 1986. In June 
1999, he was appointed 
Deputy Managing Director. Steve has been involved 
in all aspects of the development of the McDonald’s 
restaurant business in Australia and brings with him 
significant experience in the development of new 
business and franchising. He retired from McDonald’s 
Australia in 2005. Steve has also been a Director of 
Reverse Corp Limited since October 2005. Age 66.
Deborah Ralston
PhD, FAICD, SFFin, FCPA
Independent Non-Executive 
Director
Member of audit committee 
and Chairman of the 
Mortgage Choice Financial 
Planning investment 
committee
Director since 24 May 2004
Deborah is Professor 
of Finance at Monash 
University and Chair of the Australian Securities and 
Investment Commission Digital Finance Advisory 
Committee. She was formerly Executive Director of 
the Australian Centre for Financial Studies and prior to 
that, Pro Vice Chancellor at the University of Canberra. 
Deborah is a former Director of Heritage Building Society. 
Age 62.
Directors’ ReportFor the year ended 30 June 201515
The table below sets out the Directors’ interests at 30 June 2015:
Director
Particulars of Directors’ interests in shares
P D Ritchie
S J Clancy
P G Higgins
R G Higgins
S C Jermyn
D E Ralston
Company Secretary
510,125 ordinary shares
75,000 ordinary shares
359,253 ordinary shares
15,380,212 ordinary shares
2,000,000 ordinary shares
145,000 ordinary shares.
The Company Secretary is Mr David M Hoskins BCom, CPA, CSA. Mr Hoskins was appointed to the position of Company 
Secretary in 2000. Before joining Mortgage Choice he had experience in a variety of accounting and company 
secretarial functions, primarily in the finance and insurance industries.
Meetings of Directors
The numbers of meetings of the Company’s Board of Directors and of each board committee held during the year 
ended 30 June 2015, and the numbers of meetings attended by each Director were:
Full meetings of 
Directors
Audit
Nomination
Remuneration
Meetings of committees
A
7
8
7
6
7
8
B
8
8
8
8
8
8
A
*
3
2
*
3
2
B
*
3
3
*
3
3
A
1
1
*
1
*
*
B
1
1
*
1
*
*
A
3
3
*
1
*
*
B
3
3
*
3
*
*
P D Ritchie
S J Clancy
P G Higgins
R G Higgins
S C Jermyn
D E Ralston
A = Number of meetings attended
B = Number of meetings held
* = Not a member of the relevant committee
Remuneration report
The Directors are pleased to present the 2015 remuneration report which sets out remuneration information for the 
Company’s non-executive directors, Chief Executive Officer and other key management personnel (collectively KMP).
The report contains the following sections:
(a)  Chairman’s introduction
(b)  Directors and executive key management personnel disclosed in this report
(c)  Remuneration governance
(d)  Remuneration consultants
(e)  Executive remuneration policy and framework
(f)  Relationship between remuneration and Mortgage Choice Limited’s performance
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201516
(g)  Non-executive director remuneration policy
(h)  Executive remuneration received during FY 2015
(b)  Directors and executive key management 
personnel disclosed in this report
(i)  Details of share-based remuneration
Name
Position
(j)  Service agreements
Directors
(k)  Legacy equity grants vesting in FY 2015 or 
outstanding at the end of FY 2015 and granted prior 
to FY 2015
Peter D Ritchie
Non-Executive Chairman
Sean J Clancy
Non-Executive Director
(l)  Key management personnel equity holdings
Peter G Higgins
Non-Executive Director
(a)  Chairman’s introduction
Rodney G Higgins
Non-Executive Director
I would like to highlight some of the changes we 
have incorporated in our remuneration structure and 
framework in response to the “no” vote we received 
on the Remuneration Report at our last Annual General 
Meeting on 29 October 2014.
In response to investor feedback, the Board incorporated 
changes to the executive remuneration structure on the 
arrival of John Flavell as CEO in April 2015. The result of 
these changes was that the outgoing CEO and the other 
KMP executives had a different structure and mix of 
remuneration components to that of the incoming CEO. 
The existing remuneration structures remained in place 
for the outgoing CEO and the other executive KMPs until 
the end of the financial year. Changes have been made 
to the structure and mix of remuneration for the other 
KMP executives for FY 2016 to bring them in line with the 
structure and mix of the incoming CEO’s remuneration 
package. This has been done to ensure alignment 
between all KMPs and the CEO and focus them on the 
same goals and outcomes. 
As part of our changes, we have removed all share 
based remuneration that vests solely based on tenure. 
In addition, 50% of the new CEO’s STI award will be 
deferred for up to two years. We have also increased the 
required threshold performance for the TSR component 
of the LTI award from the 40th percentile to the 50th 
percentile. There will be no reward for returns that are 
below the median.
The remainder of this remuneration report provides 
more detail.
Stephen C Jermyn
Non-Executive Director
Deborah E Ralston
Non-Executive Director
Name
Position
Other key management personnel
John L Flavell (from 
23 April 2015) 1
Michael I Russell (to 
23 April 2015) 2
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Executive Officer
Susan R Mitchell
Chief Financial Officer
Neill C Rose-Innes
General Manager, Operations
Andrew J Russell
General Manager, Product 
and Distribution
Melissa J McCarney
General Manager, 
Group Marketing
1   Mr J L Flavell commenced employment with the company as 
Chief Executive Officer on 7 April 2015, for a transitional period 
until Mr M I Russell ceased to be Chief Executive Officer on 
23 April 2015.
2  Mr M I Russell was Chief Executive Officer until 23 April 2015, 
and worked alongside Mr J L Flavell during a transitional 
period from 7 April 2015.
(c) 
 Remuneration Governance
The Board Remuneration Committee has primary 
responsibility for remuneration governance. The 
Committee consists of three non-executive directors – 
Sean Clancy (independent), Rodney Higgins and Peter 
Ritchie (independent chair).
The Remuneration Committee makes recommendations 
to the Board on:
  non-executive director fees;
  remuneration levels of the Chief Executive 
Officer; and
  the over-arching executive remuneration 
framework and operation of the incentive plan.
Directors’ ReportFor the year ended 30 June 201517
The Committee’s objective is to ensure that 
remuneration policies and structures are fair, attract 
and retain executives and directors with the requisite 
experience and knowledge, and aligned with the 
long-term interests of the Company. In doing this, 
the Remuneration Committee seeks advice from 
independent remuneration consultants (see below).
The Corporate Governance Statement, which can be 
found on the Mortgage Choice website, provides further 
information on the role of this committee.
(e)  Executive remuneration policy 
and framework
In determining executive remuneration, the Board, as 
advised by the Remuneration Committee, aims to ensure 
that remuneration practices are:
  fair and reasonable, enabling the Company to 
attract and retain key skills and experience;
  aligned to the Company’s strategic and business 
objectives and the creation of shareholder value;
(d)  Remuneration consultants
During the year ending 30 June 2015, the Company’s 
Remuneration Committee employed the services 
of Guerdon Associates to advise on the design of 
the remuneration package offered to the new CEO, 
John Flavell, as well as to provide ongoing advisory 
services regarding short-term and long-term incentive 
plan design, TSR performance testing and independent 
equity valuation.
Under the terms of the various engagements, Guerdon 
Associates provided remuneration recommendations 
and was paid $69,571 for these services. Guerdon 
Associates was not engaged to provide any other 
services to Mortgage Choice during the year and has 
confirmed that its services were provided free from 
undue influence by members of the Group’s key 
management personnel.
The following arrangements were made to ensure that 
the remuneration recommendations were free from 
undue influence:
  Guerdon Associates was engaged by, 
and reported directly to, the chair of the 
Remuneration Committee;
  The agreement for the provision of remuneration 
consulting services was executed by the chair of the 
Remuneration Committee under delegated authority 
of the Board;
  The report containing remuneration 
recommendations was provided by Guerdon 
Associates directly to the chair of the Remuneration 
Committee; and
  Guerdon Associates was permitted to speak 
to management throughout the engagement 
to understand company processes, practices 
and other business issues and obtain 
management perspectives. 
As a consequence, the Board is satisfied that the 
recommendations were made free from undue influence 
from any members of the key management personnel.
  transparent, and
  acceptable to shareholders.
The executive remuneration framework has 
three components:
  base remuneration including salary, non-cash 
benefits, superannuation and deferred shares;
  short term performance incentive (STI), and
  long-term incentive (LTI).
As noted in the Chairman’s introduction to this report, 
the Board introduced a new executive remuneration 
structure during the year. Initially, this revised structure 
applied only to the incoming CEO, John Flavell. However, 
for FY2016, the changes will apply to all KMP executives 
to bring them in line with the incoming CEO’s package. 
As the change to remuneration policies was at the end of 
FY 2015, we have presented the intended remuneration 
framework for FY 2016 to ensure a clear understanding of 
our remuneration policies going forward.
Remuneration Framework for the Incoming CEO 
and FY2016
The following remuneration framework applies to 
the incoming CEO, John Flavell, from his start date 
on 7 April 2015 and to the remaining KMP executives 
(excluding Michael Russell) from 1 July 2015. 
The proportions of the remuneration components, 
assuming the maximum incentive components are paid 
in the remuneration mix, are set out in the table below.
Position
Base 
remuneration
Maximum  
STI
Maximum  
LTI
Chief Executive 
Officer, 
John Flavell
Other KMP 
executives
37%
33%
30%
65%
18%
17%
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201518
Base remuneration
An executive’s base remuneration comprises a fixed cash 
salary and superannuation limited to the maximum 
super contribution base. Executives have an opportunity 
to salary sacrifice amounts from their fixed salary 
towards additional superannuation and a series of 
prescribed benefits plus any associated fringe benefits 
tax. Base remuneration is reviewed annually against 
external benchmarks to ensure it remains appropriate 
relative to the market. Although base remuneration 
adjustments may be made after comparison to external 
benchmarks, or on promotion, there are no guaranteed 
base remuneration increases in any executive contracts. 
As other aspects of the remuneration package have a 
‘retention’ component, share based remuneration that 
vests solely based on tenure will no longer form part of 
base remuneration.
Short-term performance incentives
The short term incentive plan is designed to reward 
relative performance with a defined STI pool that is 
subject to a group modifier, or multiplier, based on the 
achievement of Company profits as compared to target. 
The pool is created with contributions set at the level 
of each individual’s target STI. The performance of each 
KMP executive, excluding the CEO, is assessed based on 
the achievement of a unique set of key performance 
indicators (“KPIs”) and the quality of their work relative 
to others, which may allow them to receive more or less 
than their target STI. KPIs include profit targets as well as 
specific operational targets such as franchise network 
growth, settlements growth, percentage of referrals to 
Mortgage Choice Financial Planning or the successful 
completion of strategic projects. These KPIs for KMP 
executives are set and assessed annually by the CEO. 
Annually the Board sets a profit target for the CEO 
as well as additional KPIs based on the strategic and 
operational goals of the Company. To achieve the 
maximum STI, the CEO must achieve both the profit 
target and his individual KPIs.
Before awarding STI to any staff, the Company must first 
reach the required profit gateway set by the Board each 
year. The final STI awarded to a KMP, including the CEO, 
may be increased or decreased by a group multiplier 
based on the Company’s achievement of the profit target 
for the year. Requiring a minimum profit hurdle to be 
achieved before any STI payments are made ensures 
additional reward is available only when value has been 
created for shareholders and when this value has been 
achieved in a manner consistent with the business plan. 
The addition of a group multiplier allows the KMPs to 
share a percentage of the additional value created for the 
shareholders by exceeding profit targets. Additionally, 
it allows the Board to penalise KMPs where the profit 
target is not met.
The CEO’s maximum STI opportunity is 90% of base 
remuneration and the target STI opportunity is between 
25% and 32% of cash salary for other executives. 
From time to time, bonuses may be paid outside this 
structure. Any amount awarded as STI is payable in cash 
following the signing of the annual report each year 
with the exception of the CEO. From FY 2016, the CEO will 
receive 50% of the awarded STI in cash and the remaining 
50% in deferred performance rights which vest in two 
equal tranches over the following two years based on 
the requirement of continuous employment. The terms 
of the deferred performance rights are described in more 
detail below.
CEO Deferred STI awarded as Performance Rights
The introduction of deferred STI for the CEO, which is a 
new initiative for FY 2016, is aimed at further aligning the 
CEO’s interests with shareholders.
From FY 2016, the CEO is eligible to receive performance 
rights under the Share Rights Plan (SRP) for 50% of his 
annual STI award. Of the amount awarded as deferred 
performance rights (if any), 50% will vest at the end of 
the next financial year (ie, 1 July 2017) and the remaining 
50 % will vest the following year (ie, 1 July 2018). As the 
performance hurdles relating to the STI are met before 
the performance rights are granted, the only criteria 
necessary for the rights to vest is based on the CEO’s 
continuous service to the relevant vesting date. Rights 
may be forfeited if a financial misstatement is uncovered 
relating to the year of the original STI award. 
A performance right is a right to one Mortgage Choice 
share, plus the number of shares that would have 
resulted from reinvestment of dividends during the 
performance period on the shares acquired on vesting 
of the rights, or these shares equivalent in cash value at 
the absolute discretion of the Company. No dividends 
are paid on unvested rights during the performance 
period, or on rights that do not vest. The shares required 
for the CEO’s performance rights might be sourced on 
market, from new issue shares, or from shares held 
by the trustee of the PSP. Treatment on cessation and 
hedging rules are the same as for the performance share 
LTI plan discussed further below.
Directors’ ReportFor the year ended 30 June 201519
A summary of the short-term incentive for FY2016 is provided in the table below:
Eligibility
Performance period
CEO and other KMP executives
1 July 2015 – 30 June 2016
Performance assessment finalised
Post audit of 30 June 2016 accounts
Payments made
31 August 2016 (except in relation to the CEO, where 50% of 
his STI award is deferred and awarded over two years)
1.  Continuous service to 1 July 2016
2.  Company meets profit requirement set by the Board
Eligibility requirements for payment
3. 
Individual meets specified KPIs (see below)
Financial gate prior to any payment
Profit gateway set by the Board
Individual assessment
KPIs vary by individual
Financial and operational KPIs
KPIs set by reference to budget and strategic plan
Payment vehicle
Deferral period
Method to determine number of shares or rights 
to grant
CEO – 50% cash, 50% deferred performance rights; 100% 
cash for other KMP executives
Performance rights (CEO only) are rights to shares 
or their cash equivalent, with the number of shares 
including shares that would have resulted from dividend 
reinvestment during the vesting period
CEO – Deferred performance rights vest 50% 1 July 2017, 
50% vest 1 July 2018; continuous service required to vest
Performance rights (CEO only) number of rights following 
a determination of STI award. Value of 50% of STI awarded 
divided by the volume weighted average price of shares 
over the 5 days prior to the grant
Hedging of unvested shares or rights
Not permitted
CEO: 90%
Maximum opportunity as a proportion of cash salary
Other executives: 25% to 32%
Option for discretion?
Long-term incentive (LTI) 
Yes, in limited circumstances, the CEO may adjust the 
portion of the STI awarded to other KMP executives
The LTI plan is a performance contingent award for achieving specified performance outcomes measured over a three-
year performance period. 
Two independent performance measures are used in the LTI plan – total shareholder return (TSR) relative to a 
comparison group and cash earnings per share (EPS) growth. 50% of performance shares will be tested against the TSR 
hurdle and the remaining 50% will be tested against the EPS hurdle.
TSR is the percentage increase in the Company’s share price plus reinvested dividends, expressed as a percentage 
of the initial investment, and reflects the increase in value delivered to shareholders over the performance period. 
The relative TSR comparison group has not been set for FY2016. The comparison group for FY2015 is comprised of 
companies within the ASX Financials sector with a market capitalisation between $40 million and $1 billion as at 
31 August 2014, excluding Real Estate Investment Trusts. The vesting scale incorporates a performance window that 
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201520
is more challenging than the performance ranges adopted by many other companies, with vesting beginning at 50th 
percentile relative TSR performance, and maximum vesting occurring at 90th percentile relative TSR performance. 
Cash EPS growth is based on the cash result as presented to the market and stated in the notes of the Company’s 
audited statutory accounts and the average number of ordinary shares on issue during the performance period. Cash 
profits are calculated by adjusting audited statutory profits for trail commission recognised on a net present value 
basis and performance shares expense. Performance requirements are expressed in terms of a compound annual 
growth (CAGR) requirement. The cash EPS growth requirement is consistent with our remuneration philosophy and 
strategic plan, and recognises that growth will be moderate given the Board’s relatively high dividend payout policy. 
The threshold to maximum performance range for vesting of LTI is 3% to 6% cash EPS growth.
40% of the LTI award will vest on achievement of threshold performance. This is less than market standards, reflecting 
our remuneration philosophy and the Board’s requirement that “cliff” vesting of reward be minimised to reduce 
the prospect of excessive risk taking as the threshold performance level for remuneration vesting is approached. 
Additional LTI vests on a pro-rata basis as performance increases until 100% is reached at the specified maximum 
performance level.
LTI awards are made in performance shares under the Performance Share Plan (PSP), which are granted at the 
beginning of the performance period and vest subject to performance assessment and the vesting criteria at the end 
of the performance period. Performance shares are held in trust on behalf of the participant and may be newly issued 
shares or purchased on market. Dividends on unvested performance shares are distributed to participants throughout 
the performance period. The Company believes that granting “at risk” equity to its executives in this way is an effective 
way of aligning the interests of executives with shareholders.
Executives will forfeit unvested LTI on cessation of employment with the Company unless the cessation results from 
death, redundancy, disablement or other exceptional circumstances, in which case, current LTI grants may remain on 
foot and subject to testing at the end of the performance period at the discretion of the Board.
Executives are prohibited from entering into any hedging (or risk reduction) arrangements in relation to LTI plan 
performance shares.
A summary of the intended FY 2016 LTI plan is shown in the table below.
Eligibility
Performance period
Frequency of grants
CEO and other KMP executives
1 July 2015 – 30 June 2018
Annual
Performance assessment finalised
Post audit of 30 June 2018 accounts
Vesting date
September, 2018
Eligibility requirements for vesting
2.  Meets minimum performance requirements
1.  Continuous service unless service is ended due 
to event of death, disability, redundancy or other 
exceptional circumstances
Directors’ ReportFor the year ended 30 June 201521
Performance shares are divided in two equal tranches:
1.  The first tranche is subject to a relative TSR hurdle; and
2.  The second tranche is subject to a hurdle based on cash 
EPS growth on a compound annual growth basis with 
target performance consistent with the Company’s 
strategic plan
For both tranches:
40% of the LTI award will vest on achievement of 
threshold performance
100% of the LTI award will vest on achievement of 
maximum performance 
Performance requirements
Prorated vesting between threshold and maximum
Payment vehicle
Method to determine number of shares to grant
Performance shares are shares inclusive of dividends, held 
in trust
Value of LTI award divided by the volume weighted 
average price of shares over the 5 days prior to the grant
Hedging of unvested shares or rights
Not permitted
Maximum opportunity as a proportion of cash salary Performance shares: CEO 80%, Other executives 25 to 30%
Option for Board discretion?
Yes, in “special” circumstances as defined by the 
Performance Share Plan
Remuneration Framework for FY 2015
The following remuneration framework applied to the outgoing CEO, Michael Russell until his departure on 
3 July 2015 and to the remaining KMP executives (excluding John Flavell) for the 2015 financial year. As Mr Flavell only 
commenced employment in April 2015, he was not eligible to receive STI or LTI awards in respect of FY2015. Mr Flavell’s 
remuneration arrangements are explained above under the section titled ‘Remuneration Framework for the Incoming 
CEO and FY2016’.
The proportions of the remuneration components, assuming the maximum incentive components are paid in the 
remuneration mix, are set out in the table below.
Position
Chief Executive Officer, John Flavell
Other KMP executives
Base remuneration
Base 
remuneration
Maximum  
STI
Maximum  
LTI
42%
69%
14%
18%
44%
13%
An executive’s base remuneration comprises a fixed cash salary and superannuation limited to the maximum super 
contribution base. Executives have an opportunity to salary sacrifice amounts from their fixed salary towards 
additional superannuation and a series of prescribed benefits plus any associated fringe benefits tax. In addition, 
executives receive deferred shares that are held in trust and vest in three equal tranches contingent on continued 
service of 1, 2 and 3 years, respectively. While originally these deferred shares were a retention incentive in the wake of 
the GFC, conservative levels of salary, company growth, and shareholder alignment advantages have permitted them 
to be retained and integrated into base remuneration.
Base remuneration is reviewed annually against external benchmarks to ensure it remains appropriate relative to 
the market. Although base remuneration adjustments may be made after comparison to external benchmarks, or on 
promotion, there are no guaranteed base remuneration increases in any executive contracts. 
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201522
Short-term performance incentives
Prior to any STI payment being considered, the Group must achieve its profit gateway for the year. Should the Group 
achieve the profit gateway target set by the Board each year, an STI funding pool is made available for allocation during 
the annual review. Any amounts awarded as STI are payable in cash following the signing of the annual report each 
year. Requiring a minimum profit hurdle to be achieved before any STI payments are made ensures additional reward 
is available only when value has been created for shareholders and when this value has been achieved in a manner 
consistent with the business plan. 
Each executive position has a maximum level of STI opportunity. Once the required profit gateway is achieved, STI 
for individual executives is primarily based on an assessment of KPIs. KPIs are related to the accountabilities of the 
position and its impact on the organisation’s or business unit’s performance. Each executive is accountable for a 
unique set of KPIs which specify operational targets for the Company to achieve its annual agreed profit target and 
business strategy. KPIs include such targets as growth in the franchise network, volume of settlements, the number 
of group office leads as well as the completion of assigned projects. These KPIs are set and assessed annually for the 
CEO by the Board and for other executives by the CEO. With the exception of the CEO, the executives may also have 
additional factors, such as their contribution to the targets of others or the achievement of new initiatives introduced 
during the year, as well as the achievement of their KPIs taken into consideration in determining the final level of their 
STI award.
For executives, the maximum STI opportunity in FY 2015 was 52 % of cash salary for the CEO and between 25% and 32% 
of cash salary for other executives. From time to time, bonuses may be paid outside this structure in relation to special 
projects or in special circumstances. No such special bonuses were paid in the period covered by this report.
A summary of the FY 2015 short-term incentive is provided in the table below:
Eligibility
Performance period
CEO and other KMP executives
1 July 2014 – 30 June 2015
Performance assessment finalised
Post audit of 30 June 2015 accounts
Payments made
31 August 2015
1.  Continuous service to 1 July 2015 unless terminated in the 
event of death, disability or redundancy
2.  Company meets gateway profit requirement set by 
the Board
Eligibility requirements for payment
3. 
Individual meets specified KPIs (see below)
Financial gate prior to any payment
Profit target set by the Board
Financial and operational KPIs
KPIs set by reference to budget and strategic plan
Individual assessment
KPIs vary by individual
Payment vehicle
Deferral period
Cash
None
CEO: 52%
Maximum opportunity as a proportion of cash salary
Other executives: 25% to 32%
Option for discretion?
Yes, in limited circumstances, the CEO may adjust the 
portion of the STI awarded to other KMP executives
In FY 2015 Mortgage Choice’s cash profit exceeded the agreed profit target. As a result, the CEO achieved his target and 
received 100% of his STI payment. The remaining executives were awarded STI in line with the achievement of their 
individual KPIs which resulted some of the KMPs receiving less than their maximum opportunity.
Directors’ ReportFor the year ended 30 June 201523
Long-term incentive (LTI) 
This section describes the LTI plan in which the former 
CEO, Mr Russell, and KMP executives were eligible to 
participate in FY 2015.
The LTI plan is a performance contingent award for 
achieving specified performance outcomes measured 
over a three-year performance period. 
Two independent performance measures are used in 
the LTI plan – total shareholder return (TSR) relative 
to a comparison group and cash earnings per share 
(EPS) growth. 50% of performance shares will be tested 
against the TSR hurdle and the remaining 50% will be 
tested against the EPS hurdle.
TSR is the percentage increase in the Company’s 
share price plus reinvested dividends, expressed as a 
percentage of the initial investment, and reflect the 
increase in value delivered to shareholders over the 
performance period. The relative TSR comparison group 
is comprised of companies within the ASX Financials 
sector with a market capitalisation between $40 million 
and $1 billion as at 31 August 2014, excluding Real Estate 
Investment Trusts. The vesting scale incorporates a 
performance window that is more challenging than the 
performance ranges adopted by many other companies, 
with vesting beginning at 40th percentile relative TSR 
performance, and maximum vesting occurring at 90th 
percentile relative TSR performance. 
The comparator group for the PSP offers made in FY 2015 
comprises: Steadfast Group (SDF), Cover-More Group 
(CVO), Austbrokers Holdings (AUB), Ozforex Group (OFX), 
Cedar Woods Properties (CWP), Peet (PPC), Servcorp (SRV), 
ClearView Wealth (CVW), MyState (MYS), Equity Trustees 
(EQT), Finbar Group (FRI), Bentham Limited IMF (IMF), 
Sunland Group (SDG), Treasury Group (TRG), AVJennings 
(AVJ), HFA Holdings (HFA), Wide Bay Australia (WBB), Villa 
World (VLW), Yellow Brick Road Holdings (YBR), Euroz 
Ltd (EZL), Lifestyle Communition (LIC), Devine (DVN), 
Blue Sky Alternative Investments (BLA), FSA Group 
(FSA), Bell Financial Group (BFG), K2 Asset Management 
Holdings (KAM), Payce Cons (PAY), Folkestone (FLK), 
Money3 Corp (MNY), ASF Group (AFA), Calliden Group 
(CIX), PBD Developments (PBD), CIC Australia (CNB), 
Phileo Australia (PHI), Elanor Investor (ENN), Homeloans 
(HOM), Emerchants (EML), Pioneer Credit (PNC), Wilson 
HTM Investment Group (WIG), Centrepoint Alliance 
(CAF), Centuria Capital (CNI), APN Property Group (APD), 
Fiducian Portfolio (FPS), ThinkSmart (TSM), Hunter 
Hall International (HHL), Hub24 (HUB), Digital CC (DCC), 
Australian ethical investments (AEF).
Cash EPS growth is based on the cash result as presented 
to the market and stated in the notes of the Company’s 
audited statutory accounts and the average number 
of ordinary shares on issue during the performance 
period. Cash profits are calculated by adjusting audited 
statutory profits for trail commission recognised on a net 
present value basis and performance shares expense. 
Performance requirements are expressed in terms 
of a compound annual growth (CAGR) requirement. 
The cash EPS growth requirement is consistent with 
our remuneration philosophy and strategic plan, and 
recognises that growth will be moderate given the 
Board’s relatively high dividend payout policy. The 
threshold to maximum performance range for vesting of 
LTI is 2% to 5% cash EPS growth.
35% of the LTI award will vest on the achievement 
of threshold performance. This is less than market 
standards, reflecting our remuneration philosophy and 
the board’s requirement that “cliff” vesting of reward be 
minimised to reduce the prospect of excessive risk taking 
as the threshold performance level for remuneration 
vesting is approached. Additional LTI vests on a pro-rata 
basis as performance increases until 100% is reached at 
the specified maximum performance level.
LTI awards are made in performance shares under the 
Performance Share Plan (PSP), which are granted at the 
beginning of the performance period and vest subject 
to performance assessment and the vesting criteria at 
the end of the performance period. Performance shares 
are held in trust on behalf of the participant and may be 
newly issued shares or purchased on market. Dividends 
on unvested performance shares are distributed to 
participants throughout the performance period. The 
Company believes that granting “at risk” equity to its 
executives in this way is an effective way of aligning the 
interests of executives with shareholders. 
Executives will forfeit unvested LTI on cessation of 
employment with the Company unless the cessation 
results from death, redundancy, disablement or other 
exceptional circumstances, in which case, current LTI 
grants may remain on foot and subject to testing at 
the end of the performance period at the discretion of 
the Board.
Executives are prohibited from entering into any hedging 
(or risk reduction) arrangements in relation to LTI plan 
performance shares or performance rights.
PSP features applicable to all grants
Shares will be acquired for participants following their 
acceptance of an offer made under the Plan. The shares 
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201524
will be acquired by the plan trustee and held on trust 
for participants until they are withdrawn from the Plan 
(after they have vested or are deemed to be vested) or 
are forfeited, in circumstances outlined below. Shares 
will be acquired only at times permitted under the 
Company’s share trading policy. Shares may be acquired 
by on-market or off-market purchases, by subscribing 
for new shares to be issued by the Company, or through 
the reallocation of forfeited shares. The method of 
acquisition for each share allocation will be determined 
by the Board. The Company will fund the costs of all 
share acquisitions under the Plan. Participants will not 
be required to make any payment for the acquisition of 
shares under the Plan. 
A Notice of Withdrawal may be lodged by a participant 
following the earlier of:
  a date ten years from grant date; 
  the participant ceasing to be an employee of 
the Company; 
  a ‘capital event’ (generally, a successful takeover 
offer or scheme of arrangement relating to the 
Company) occurring; or
  the date upon which the Board gives its written 
consent to the lodgement of a Notice of Withdrawal 
by the participant. 
While shares remain subject to the PSP rules, 
participants will, in general, enjoy the rights attached 
to those shares (such as voting or dividend rights etc.). 
If a participant resigns from his or her employment 
with the Company, or otherwise ceases employment 
in circumstances not involving “special circumstances”, 
the participant will be required to forfeit any unvested 
shares held under the Plan on the participant’s behalf, 
unless the Board otherwise determines. Vested shares 
will be eligible for withdrawal in accordance with the 
usual procedure.
If a participant ceases to be employed by the Company 
or retires from office as a result of special circumstances 
(including death, disability, retirement, redundancy, 
corporate restructure, or any other circumstances 
determined by the Board), the Board may in its discretion 
determine that all or a portion of the participant’s 
unvested shares are to be treated as vested shares, 
notwithstanding the fact that the vesting conditions 
applicable to the shares have not been met because the 
applicable performance period has not expired.
If the Board determines that a participant has acted 
fraudulently or dishonestly, has committed an act of 
harassment or discrimination, is in serious breach of any 
duty to Mortgage Choice, or, in the Board’s reasonable 
opinion, has brought Mortgage Choice into serious 
disrepute, any shares to which the participant may have 
become entitled at the end of the performance period, 
and any shares held by the participant under the PSP are 
forfeited by the participant.
CEO Performance Rights LTI Plan
In addition to the LTI plan elements described above, 
the former CEO was also eligible to receive performance 
rights under the Share Rights Plan (SRP). FY 2014 was the 
first year that these performance rights were granted. A 
second tranche of performance rights was issued to the 
CEO in September 2014. A performance right is a right 
to one Mortgage Choice Limited share, plus the number 
of shares that would have resulted from reinvestment 
of dividends during the performance period on the 
shares acquired on vesting of the rights, or these shares 
equivalent in cash value at the absolute discretion of 
the Company. No dividends are paid on unvested rights 
during the performance period, or on rights that do not 
vest. The shares required for the CEO’s performance 
rights LTI plan might be sourced on market, from newly 
issued shares, or from shares held by the trustee of the 
PSP. Treatment on cessation and hedging rules are the 
same as for the performance share LTI plan.
Performance rights are issued subject to three-year 
performance conditions in the form of a balanced 
scorecard, with four primary objectives that directly 
reflect the operational application of the strategic 
plan set and approved by the Board. Achievement is 
measured against a quantitative threshold utilising 
target and stretch measures, with a maximum of 25% 
of the rights vesting in accordance with performance 
against each independent requirement on a sliding scale. 
The four primary strategic plan objectives focus the 
CEO on the transition of Mortgage Choice to a retail 
diversified financial services provider without sacrificing 
growth in the core broking business. Diversification 
objectives include the expansion of the adviser count 
in the financial planning network as well as targeted 
growth in diversified revenue. Objectives also target 
growth in profits of the mortgage broking business 
and the group as a whole. Actual requirements remain 
commercially sensitive during the performance period 
but will be disclosed in full at the end of the period.
Directors’ ReportFor the year ended 30 June 201525
A summary of FY 2015 LTI plans is shown in the table below.
Eligibility
Performance period
Frequency of grants
CEO and other KMP executives
1 July 2014 – 30 June 2017
Annual
Performance assessment finalised
Post audit of 30 June 2017 accounts
Vesting date
1 July 2017 (share rights)
14 September 2017 (performance shares)
Eligibility requirements for vesting
2.  Meets minimum performance requirements
1.  Continuous service unless service is ended due 
to event of death, disability, redundancy or other 
exceptional circumstances
Performance shares are divided into two equal tranches 
(CEO and other KMP executives):
1.  The first tranche is subject to a relative TSR hurdle which 
measures the Company’s TSR relative to ASX Financials 
companies with a market capitalisation between 
$40 million and $1 billion at 31 August 2014, with specific 
companies in the peer group detailed in section (k) of the 
Remuneration report. The threshold performance is the 
40th percentile, and maximum performance is the 90th 
percentile; and
2.  The second tranche is subject to a hurdle based on cash 
EPS growth on a compound annual growth basis with 
target performance consistent with the Company’s 
strategic plan
For both tranches:
35% of the LTI award will vest on achievement of 
threshold performance
100% of the LTI award will vest on achievement of 
maximum performance
Prorated vesting between threshold and maximum
Performance rights (CEO only):
1.  Growth in financial planning network
2.  Growth in diversified revenues
3.  Profit growth in Mortgage Choice’s core broking 
business profit
4.  Profit growth for the group
Satisfaction of each requirement can result in a maximum 
of 25% of the rights vesting, with target performance 
consistent with strategic plan
Performance shares (CEO and other KMP executives) are 
shares inclusive of dividends, held in trust
Performance rights (CEO only) are rights to shares or their 
cash equivalent
Performance requirements
Payment vehicle
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201526
Method to determine number of shares or rights 
to grant
Performance shares (CEO and other KMP executives) Value 
of LTI divided by the volume weighted average price of 
shares over the 5 days prior to the grant
Performance rights (CEO only): Number of rights 
determined by the Remuneration Committee and 
the Board
Hedging of unvested shares or rights
Not permitted
Maximum opportunity as a proportion of cash salary
Option for Board discretion?
Legacy equity grants
Performance shares: CEO 50%, Other executives 25 to 
30%; Performance rights: (CEO only): Number of rights 
determined by the Remuneration Committee and 
the Board
Yes, in “special” circumstances as defined by the 
Performance Share Plan
Legacy equity grants to executives from prior years that are still outstanding as at the end of the financial year, or that 
have vested or partially vested during the financial year, are described in section (k) of the Remuneration Report.
(f)  Relationship between remuneration and Mortgage Choice Limited’s performance
Payments made under the STI plan are conditional upon the Company achieving a pre-determined profit target. A 
component of the grants made under PSP in FY 2012, FY 2013, FY 2014 and FY2015 is conditional on cash EPS growth. The 
following table lists Mortgage Choice Limited’s cash earnings per share (EPS):
Year
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Cash EPS 
(cents per 
share)
13.3
12.5
12.9
16.2
15.0
A component of grants made under PSP in FY 2012, FY 2013, FY2014 and FY 2015 is conditional on the total shareholder 
return (TSR) of the Company over a three-year period as compared to the TSRs of comparator groups of companies. TSR 
is the percentage increase in the Company’s share price plus reinvested dividends and reflects the increase in value 
delivered to shareholders over the period.
Directors’ ReportFor the year ended 30 June 201527
The following table shows the Company’s TSR expressed as a percentage of the opening value of the investment for 
each period:
Year
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Opening share 
price 
$
Closing share 
price 
$
Dividends 
paid during 
year  
(cents)
1.13
1.24
1.29
2.13
2.85
1.24
1.29
2.13
2.84
2.30
12.5
13.0
13.0
14.5
15.5
TSR
21%
14%
79%
41%
-14%
The figure below illustrates and compares the Company’s TSR performance with the ASX 200 index return performance 
for the five-year period to 30 June 2015.
Mortgage Choice TSR compared to S&P/ASX 200 Index Return 
n
r
u
t
e
R
r
e
d
l
o
h
e
r
a
h
S
l
a
t
o
T
300%
250%
200%
150%
100%
50%
0%
-50%
Mortgage Choice
S&P/ASX 200
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
Source: Guerdon Associates
(g)  Non-Executive Director remuneration policy
Shareholders set the maximum aggregate remuneration of the Board (excluding any Managing Director and any 
executive Director) at $750,000 at the General Meeting on 5 April 2004.
Fees paid to the Chairman and the Non-Executive Directors take into account the demands made on, and the 
responsibilities of, the Directors. The Chairman and other Non-Executive Directors do not receive any short-term cash 
incentives or share-based payments; nor do they receive additional payments for representation on committees other 
than the chairman of the Mortgage Choice Financial Planning Pty Ltd Investment Committee. Non-Executive Directors 
do not receive retirement allowances. Superannuation contributions, as required under the Australian superannuation 
guarantee legislation, are paid on Non-Executive Directors’ remuneration and are included in the fees below.
The Board reviews fees periodically. 
There have been no changes to fee policy since the last disclosure period.
In FY 2015, the Chairman was paid an annual fee of $125,000 and each other Non-Executive Director was paid an 
annual fee of $75,000. In addition to these fees the chair of the Mortgage Choice Financial Planning Pty Ltd Investment 
committee was paid $30,000. Mandated superannuation contributions are in addition to these base board fees.
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 2015 
 
28
(h)  Executive remuneration received during FY 2015
The table below shows the ‘realised remuneration’ that executives received in relation to FY 2015. These amounts 
will differ from the statutory tables in the section ‘Details of remuneration’, which are prepared in accordance with 
the Corporations Act and Australian Accounting Standards, and which, as a general principle, value shares based 
payments based on the value at the time of grant and do not reflect actual vesting outcomes.
In the table below, the total cash payments received are made up of base remuneration consisting of cash salary and 
superannuation. Deferred shares vesting in FY2015 include all deferred shares offered from FY 2012 onwards that vested 
during the year. STI represents cash STI in respect of FY2015 and the LTI column represents LTI grants from FY 2011 and FY 
2012 that vested in FY 2015. Share based remuneration is stated at the value at the vesting date.
Name
J L Flavell, CEO (from 23/4/15)*
M I Russell, CEO (to 23/4/15)**
S R Mitchell
N C Rose–Innes
A J Russell
M J McCarney
Base Remuneration
Cash Salary and 
Superannuation 
$
Deferred Shares 
vesting FY 2015 
$
–
STI
STI 
$
–
LTI
Past Awards 
vesting FY 2015 
$
Total 
Remuneration 
$
–
133,479
133,479
581,578
323,350
295,533
323,350
244,283
120,193
292,654
669,562
1,663,987
37,764
33,346
32,810
5,282
97,461
75,276
82,842
45,100
206,505
665,080
179,148
115,403
–
583,303
554,405
294,665
*  JL Flavell commenced employment on 7 April 2015 becoming CEO on 23 April 2015 
** M I Russell resigned as CEO on 23 April 2015 and continued to be employed by the company until 3 July 2015
Share based remuneration above is stated at share price at the vesting date. From the date of grant the 
Mortgage Choice share price has increased markedly which has resulted in an increase in executive remuneration in 
line with the increase in shareholder value over the period. The additional remuneration related to the increase in 
share price from the date of grant to the vesting date is shown below.
Name
M I Russell, CEO
S R Mitchell
N C Rose-Innes
A J Russell
M J McCarney
Increase in 
Remuneration 
from Share Price 
Appreciation 
$
420,043
129,700
112,576
74,705
19
Directors’ ReportFor the year ended 30 June 201529
Details of remuneration
The following tables detail remuneration received for the 2014 and 2015 financial years by the Directors and other key 
management personnel in place during the year ending 30 June 2015. 
2015
Name
Short-term benefits
Post-
employment 
benefits
Long-term 
benefits
Share-based 
payments
Cash 
salary 
and fees 
$
Non-
monetary 
benefits 
$
STI 
$
Super-
annuation 
$
Long 
service 
leave 
$
Perform-
ance 
Shares 
$
Other 
$
Total 
$
Non-Executive Directors
P D Ritchie, Chairman
125,000
S J Clancy
P G Higgins
R G Higgins
S C Jermyn
D E Ralston1
Other key management 
personnel
J L Flavell, CEO (from 
23/4/15 to 30/6/15)
M I Russell, CEO (from 
1/7/14 to 23/4/15)2
75,000
75,000
75,000
75,000
105,000
142,946
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
11,875
7,125
7,125
7,125
7,125
9,975
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
136,875
82,125
82,125
82,125
82,125
114,975
4,696
–
102,9373
 –
250,579
584,441
292,654
18,697
18,783
(27,387)
S R Mitchell
283,604
97,461
N C Rose-Innes
287,905
75,276
273
273
18,783
7,323
18,783
8,200
A J Russell
315,172
82,842
12,002
18,783
5,264
M J McCarney
235,424
45,100
12,002
18,783
1,438
–
–
–
–
–
166,786 1,053,974
85,217
492,661
76,361
466,798
77,230
511,293
32,913
345,660
1  Ms D E Ralston is the Chairman of the Mortgage Choice Financial Planning Investment Committee
2  M I Russell resigned as CEO on 23 April 2015 and continued to be employed by the company until 3 July 2015
3  Share based payments relating to Mr J L Flavell represent a “make whole” performance rights grant to compensate him for the LTI 
value forfeited upon his departure from his former employer to join the Company. The grant was the equity equivalent of $440,500 
granted as performance share rights, based on the VWAP over the 5 trading days prior to the start of employment. The grant will 
vest in three equal tranches subject to continued service on each of the relevant vesting dates (being, September of 2015, 2016, 
and 2017). The terms of the performance rights are equivalent to those described in section (e), Framework for the Incoming CEO 
and FY2016
No termination benefits were paid during the period.
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201530
2014
Name
Short-term benefits
Post-
employment 
benefits
Long-term 
benefits
Share-based 
payments
Cash 
salary 
and fees 
$
Non-
monetary 
benefits 
$
STI 
$
Super-
annuation 
$
Long 
service 
leave 
$
Perform-
ance 
Shares 
$
Other 
$
Total 
$
Non-Executive Directors
P D Ritchie, Chairman
125,000
S J Clancy
P G Higgins
R G Higgins
S C Jermyn
D E Ralston1
Other key management 
personnel
75,000
75,000
75,000
75,000
112,500
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
11,562
6,938
6,938
6,938
6,938
10,406
–
–
–
–
–
–
M I Russell, CEO
578,530
292,653
26,632
17,775
9,209
S R Mitchell
294,645
95,084
280
17,775
4,962
N C Rose-Innes
271,196
86,400
20,243
17,775
6,243
A J Russell
271,552
86,400
17,574
17,775
2,823
M J McCarney
227,653
55,000
280
17,775
518
S C Dehne2 (from 1/7/13 
to 31/12/13)
107,825
–
–
8,887
(4,625)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
136,562
81,938
81,938
81,938
81,938
122,906
741,021 1,665,820
93,133
505,879
82,397
484,254
72,742 468,866
17,331
318,557
(6,285)
105,802
1  Ms D E Ralston is the Chairman of the Mortgage Choice Financial Planning Investment Committee
2  Mr S C Dehne ceased to be employed by the Company due to the sale of the LoanKit business 30 September 2013. As the 
circumstances of his departure met the criteria of “special circumstances” under the Performance Share Plan rules, the Board 
exercised its discretion and allowed the vesting of his tenure based shares, the remaining shares were forfeited.
No termination benefits were paid during the period.
The relative proportions of remuneration that are linked to fixed remuneration and performance based criteria are 
as follows: 
Fixed/ service based remuneration
At risk/performance based remuneration
Name
Salary, super 
and fringe 
benefits
Other key management personnel of Group
Share Based
Total
STI
LTI (Equity 
based) 
Total
J L Flavell
M I Russell
S R Mitchell
N C Rose-Innes
A J Russell
M J McCarney
59%
56%
63%
67%
69%
78%
41%
33%
5%
5%
4%
3%
100%
89%
68%
72%
73%
81%
0%
28%
20%
16%
16%
13%
0%
-17%
12%
12%
11%
6%
0%
11%
32%
28%
27%
19%
Directors’ ReportFor the year ended 30 June 201531
(i)  Details of share-based remuneration
The terms and conditions of each offer of performance shares affecting remuneration in this or future reporting periods 
are as follows:
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
Grant date
Vesting date
20 September 2010
3 September 2014
16 February 2012
12 September 2014
16 February 2012
12 September 2014
Value per 
performance share at 
grant date*
Performance 
achieved
% 
Vested
$1.19
$1.26
$1.26
service based
service based
>5% growth 
16 February 2012
12 September 2014
$0.78
>90th percentile
14 September 2012
12 September 2014
14 September 2012
3 July 2015**
14 September 2012
14 September 2015
14 September 2012
14 September 2015
$1.74
$1.74
$1.74
$1.74
service based
service based
service based
to be determined
to be determined to be determined
14 September 2012
14 September 2015
$1.08
to be determined to be determined
23 September 2013
12 September 2014
23 September 2013
3 July 2015**
23 September 2013
14 September 2015
23 September 2013
14 September 2016
23 September 2013
14 September 2016
23 September 2013
14 September 2016
22 September 2014
3 July 2015**
22 September 2014
14 September 2015
22 September 2014
14 September 2016
22 September 2014
14 September 2017
22 September 2014
14 September 2017
22 September 2014
14 September 2017
$2.77
$2.77
$2.77
$2.77
$2.77
$1.68
$2.72
$2.72
$2.72
$2.72
$2.72
$1.68
service based
service based
100%
100%
service based
to be determined
service based
to be determined
to be determined to be determined
to be determined to be determined
service based
100%
service based
to be determined
service based
to be determined
service based
to be determined
to be determined to be determined
to be determined to be determined
*  The value at grant date calculated in accordance with AASB 2 Share-based Payments of shares granted during the year as part 
of remuneration.
** The vesting date of service based performance shares for MI Russell has been brought forward from September 2015 to his 
termination date of 3 July 2015.
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201532
The terms and conditions of each offer of share rights affecting remuneration in this or future reporting periods are 
as follows:
Grant date
Vesting date
21 August 2014
1 July 2015
7 April 2015
7 April 2015
7 April 2015
7 October 2015
7 October 2016
7 October 2017
Value per share right 
at grant date*
Performance 
achieved
% 
Vested
100%
$3.09
$2.60
$2.60
$2.60
service based
service based
to be determined
service based
to be determined
service based
to be determined
*  The value at grant date calculated in accordance with AASB 2 Share-based Payments of shares granted during the year as part 
of remuneration.
Details of performance shares in the Company provided as remuneration to other key management personnel are set 
out below. Further information on the performance shares is set out in note 31 to the financial statements. 
Name
Other key management personnel
J L Flavell
M I Russell
S R Mitchell
N C Rose–Innes
A J Russell
M J McCarney
Number of 
performance 
shares granted 
during the year
Value of 
performance 
shares at grant 
date*
Number of 
performance 
shares vested 
during the year
Number of 
performance 
shares 
forfeited 
during the year
–
97,302
31,594
73,615
28,709
66,892
31,594
19,493
73,615
45,419
–
–
–
226,714
282,076
186,337
87,255
75,916
53,314
1,900
–
–
–
–
*  The value at grant date calculated in accordance with AASB 2 Share-based Payments of shares granted during the year as part 
of remuneration.
*  The value at lapse date of performance shares that lapsed during the year because a vesting condition was not satisfied is 
calculated assuming the performance conditions were satisfied.
Details of share rights provided as remuneration to the CEO are set out below. Further information on the share rights 
is set out in note 31 to the financial statements. 
Name
Number of 
share rights 
granted during 
the year
Value of share 
rights at grant 
date*
Number of 
share rights 
vested during 
the year
Number of 
share rights 
forfeited 
during the year
J L Flavell – initial ‘make good’ equity grant
169,678
440,500
M I Russell
375,000
1,158,750
–
–
–
562,500
*  The value at grant date calculated in accordance with AASB 2 Share-based Payments of shares granted during the year as part 
of remuneration.
The assessed fair value at grant date of performance shares granted to individuals is allocated equally over the period 
from grant date to vesting date, and the amount is included in the remuneration tables above. The fair value of 
market based conditions at grant date are independently determined using a Monte Carlo simulation model utilising 
a lattice-based trinomial valuation method that takes into account the term of the performance shares, the vesting 
criteria, the exercise price (zero), the expected price volatility of the underlying share, the expected dividend yield 
(acknowledging that dividends will be paid to participants from the date of grant) and the risk free interest rate for the 
term of the performance shares. 
Directors’ ReportFor the year ended 30 June 201533
Shares provided on vesting of performance share and share right entitlements
Details of shares issued by the Company as a result of the vesting of performance share entitlements during the year 
ended 30 June 2015 are set out below:
Grant date
Vesting date
Other key management personnel
M I Russell
M I Russell
S R Mitchell
S R Mitchell
N C Rose-Innes
N C Rose-Innes
A J Russell
3 September 2014
12 September 2014
3 September 2014
12 September 2014
3 September 2014
12 September 2014
12 September 2014
Number of ordinary 
shares issued 
on vesting of 
performance shares
Value of  
vesting date*
79,766
202,310
24,284
62,971
20,684
55,232
53,314
227,333
562,422
69,209
175,059
58,949
153,545
148,213
*  The value at vesting date of shares that were granted as part of remuneration and vested during the year is the closing market price 
on the day of vesting.
Details of remuneration: cash STIs and share based remuneration
For each cash STI and grant of share based remuneration in the tables in section (i) of this report, the percentage of the 
available grant that was paid, or that vested, in the financial year, and the percentage that was forfeited because the 
person did not meet the service or performance criteria is set out below. Share based remuneration will not vest if the 
conditions are not satisfied. Hence the minimum value of the performance shares and options yet to vest is nil. The 
maximum value of the share based remuneration yet to vest has been determined as the amount of the grant date fair 
value of the underlying shares that is yet to be expensed.
STI
Performance Shares
Name
M I Russell
Potential 
FY2015 
Bonus 
Payable 
%
Potential 
FY2015 
Bonus 
Forfeited 
%
100
–
Financial 
Year 
granted
Vested 
%
Forfeited 
%
Financial 
years in 
which 
shares 
may vest
Minimum 
total value 
of grant 
yet to vest 
$
Maximum 
total value 
of grant 
yet to vest 
$
2015
2015
2015
2014
2014
2014
2013
2013
2012
2011
–
–
–
–
–
100
–
100
100
100
100 30/6/2018
100 30/6/2017
– 30/6/2016
100 30/6/2017
– 30/6/2016
–
–
– 30/6/2016
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Nil
–
Nil
–
Nil
–
–
–
–
–
309
–
165
–
14,750
–
–
–
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201534
STI
Performance Shares
Name
S R Mitchell
Potential 
FY2015 
Bonus 
Payable 
%
Potential 
FY2015 
Bonus 
Forfeited 
%
100
–
N C Rose–Innes
85
15
A J Russell
85
15
M J McCarney
80
20
Financial 
Year 
granted
Vested 
%
Forfeited 
%
Financial 
years in 
which 
shares 
may vest
Minimum 
total value 
of grant 
yet to vest 
$
Maximum 
total value 
of grant 
yet to vest 
$
2015
2015
2015
2014
2014
2014
2013
2013
2012
2011
2015
2015
2015
2014
2014
2014
2013
2013
2012
2011
2015
2015
2015
2014
2014
2014
2013
2013
2012
2015
2015
2015
2014
2014
2014
–
–
–
–
–
100
–
100
100
100
–
–
–
–
–
100
–
100
100
100
–
–
–
–
–
100
–
100
100
–
–
–
–
–
– 30/6/2018
– 30/6/2017
– 30/6/2016
– 30/6/2017
– 30/6/2016
–
–
– 30/6/2016
–
–
–
–
–
–
– 30/6/2018
– 30/6/2017
– 30/6/2016
– 30/6/2017
– 30/6/2016
–
–
– 30/6/2016
–
–
–
–
–
–
– 30/6/2018
– 30/6/2017
– 30/6/2016
– 30/6/2017
– 30/6/2016
–
–
– 30/6/2016
–
–
–
–
– 30/6/2018
– 30/6/2017
– 30/6/2016
– 30/6/2017
– 30/6/2016
100
–
–
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
–
Nil
–
–
–
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
–
Nil
–
–
–
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
–
Nil
–
–
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
Nil
–
43,991
4,380
1,542
28,558
908
–
5,276
–
–
–
39,976
3,977
1,402
25,960
823
–
4,620
–
–
–
43,991
4,380
1,542
25,960
823
–
4,620
–
–
27,141
2,703
948
17,615
559
–
Directors’ ReportFor the year ended 30 June 201535
Share Rights
Financial 
Year 
granted
Vested 
%
Forfeited 
%
Financial 
years in 
which 
shares 
may vest
Minimum 
total value 
of grant 
yet to vest 
$
Maximum 
total value 
of grant 
yet to vest 
$
2015
2015
2015
2015
2015
2014
–
–
–
–
–
–
– 30/6/2018
– 30/6/2017
– 30/6/2016
100 30/6/2018
– 30/6/2016
100 30/6/2016
Nil
Nil
Nil
–
Nil
Nil
133,354
124,409
79,802
–
1,054
–
Name
J L Flavell
M I Russell
(j)  Service agreements
On appointments to the Board after it was listed as a public company, Non-Executive Directors enter into a service 
agreement with the Company in the form of a letter of appointment. The letter summarises the Board policies and 
terms, including compensation, relevant to the Director.
Remuneration and other terms of employment for the CEO, J L Flavell, and other executives are set out in their 
respective letters of employment. The employment terms do not prescribe the duration of employment for executives. 
The periods of notice required to terminate employment are set out below:
  The employment contract of Mr J L Flavell is terminable by either the Company or the executive with 
six months notice.
  The employment contracts of all other key management personnel are terminable by either the Company or the 
executive with three months notice.
No provision is made in the contracts for termination payments other than amounts paid in respect of notice 
of termination.
(k)  Legacy equity grants vesting in FY 2015 or outstanding at the end of FY 2015 and granted prior  
to FY 2015
FY 2011 grants
Shares offered under the Performance Share Plan (PSP) in FY 2011 vested over a four year period, with one third of 
each grant vesting two years into the period, one third three years in and the remaining third vesting at year four. The 
criterion for vesting is continuous service over the period to the vesting date. 
The final third of the shares granted in FY 2011 vested in September 2014.
Detailed vesting information is shown for each tranche in section (i) of this report.
FY 2012 and FY 2013 grants
Shares offered under the Performance Share Plan (PSP) in FY 2012 and FY 2013 are divided into three tranches each 
with its own vesting criteria. The two largest tranches (which comprise 75% of the year’s grant) vest at the end of a 
three-year period based on performance criteria as described below. 
Shares offered under the Performance Share Plan (PSP) in the first post FY2011 tranche vest over a three year period with 
a third vesting one year into the period, a third two years in and the remaining third vesting at year three. The criterion 
for vesting is based on continuous service over the period to the vesting date.
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201536
Detailed vesting information is shown for each tranche 
in section (i) of this report.
The second tranche vests based on achieving a target 
compound growth in cash EPS. The shares will vest 
at the end of the three-year performance period if 
the Company’s annual growth in cash based EPS on a 
compounded basis for the three-year period exceeds 2%, 
in accordance with the following vesting scale:
Company compound annual 
growth in Cash EPS
Percentage of EPS based 
performance shares granted
Below 2%
At 2%
At or above 5%
0%
35%
100%
For compound EPS growth between 2% and 5%, the 
percentage of EPS-based performance shares to vest will 
increase from 35% to 100% on a straight line basis.
Following the divestiture of LoanKit in September 
2013, the Board determined in August 2014 that it was 
appropriate to remove discontinued operations from 
the cash EPS vesting calculations. The effect of this 
decision was to remove operating losses from the base 
year cash profit figure for the grants in September 2011 
and 2012 vesting in FY2015 and FY2016 and to remove 
the operating losses and gain on sale from the base 
year cash profit figure for the grant in in September 2013 
vesting in FY2017.
The third tranche will vest based on a target TSR 
performance relative to a comparator group at the end 
of a three year period. Should the Company’s TSR for the 
three year period exceed the 40th percentile of the TSR 
of the comparator group, shares vest in accordance with 
the following vesting scale: 
Company performance (TSR 
percentile ranking)
Percentage of TSR based 
performance shares granted
Below the 40th percentile
At the 40th percentile
90th percentile or above
0%
25%
100%
For TSR performance between the 40th percentile and 
the 90th percentile, the TSR-based performance shares 
will vest on a straight-line basis. 
The Company’s TSR is compared to that of a comparator 
group comprised of selected listed companies included 
within ASX Financials with a market capitalisation of less 
than $1 billion but more than $40 million at 31 August. 
The comparator group excludes property related trusts 
or companies.
The comparator group for the PSP offers made in FY 
2014 comprises: FlexiGroup (FXL), Steadfast Group (SDF), 
Austbrokers Holdings (AUB), OzForex Group (OFX), SFG 
Australia (SFW), Cover-More Group (CVO), Peet (PPC), 
Cedar Woods Properties (CWP), Servcorp (SRV), ClearView 
Wealth (CVW), ETFS Metal Securities Australia (GOL), 
MyState (MYS), Equity Trustees (EQT), Finbar Group (FRI), 
Bentham IMF (IMF), Sunland Group (SDG), Treasury 
Group (TRG), AVJennings (AVJ), Wide Bay Australia (WBB), 
Euroz (EZL), Villa World (VLW), Blue Sky Alternative 
Investments (BLA), Lifestyle Communities (LIC), K2 Asset 
Management Holdings (KAM), Devine (DVN), FSA Group 
(FSA), Bell Financial Group (BFG), Payce Consolidated 
(PAY), PBD Developments (PBD), Yellow Brick Road 
Holdings (YBR), HFA Holdings (HFA), Folkestone (FLK), 
Money3 Corp (MNY), CIC Australia (CNB), Phileo Australia 
(PHI), ASF Group (AFA), Calliden Group (CIX), Homeloans 
(HOM), Emerchants (EML), Pioneer Credit (PNC), Wilson 
HTM Investment Group (WIG), Centuria Capital (CNI), 
Digital CC (DCC), APN Property Group (APD), ThinkSmart 
(TSM), Hunter Hall International (HHL), Centrepoint 
Alliance (CAF), Fiducian Portfolio Services (FPS), Oncard 
International (ONC).
If any of the companies in the comparator group ceases 
to exist in its original form for any reason other than its 
liquidation, or if the Board determines in its discretion 
that a company should no longer be in the comparator 
group because of an anomaly, distortion or other event 
that is not directly related to the financial performance 
of that company, that company will cease to form part 
of the comparator group. 
Directors’ ReportFor the year ended 30 June 201537
(l)  Key management personnel equity holdings
Performance shares
The number of performance shares held during the financial year by each Director of Mortgage Choice Limited and 
other key management personnel of the Group, including their personally related parties, are set out below.
2015
Name
Balance at the 
start of the 
year
Granted as 
compensation
Vested
Forfeited
Balance at the 
end of the year
Unvested
Key management personnel of the Group
J L Flavell
M I Russell
S R Mitchell
N C Rose–Innes
A J Russell
M J McCarney
Shares rights
–
–
–
–
–
–
547,379
97,302
(282,076)
(186,337)
176,268
176,268
171,297
150,624
128,021
22,780
31,594
28,709
31,594
19,493
(87,255)
(75,916)
(53,314)
(1,900)
–
–
–
–
115,636
103,417
115,636
103,417
106,301
106,301
40,373
40,373
The number of shares rights held during the financial year by each Director of Mortgage Choice Limited and other key 
management personnel of the Group, including their personally related parties, are set out below.
2015
Name
Balance at the 
start of the 
year
Granted as 
compensation
Vested
Forfeited
Balance at the 
end of the year
Unvested
Key management personnel of the Group
J L Flavell
M I Russell
Share holdings
–
169,678
281,250
375,000
–
–
–
169,678
169,678
(562,500)
93,750
93,750
The number of shares in the Company held during the financial year by each Director of Mortgage Choice Limited and 
other key management personnel of the Group, including their close family members and their controlled entities, are 
set out below. 
2015
Name
Directors of Mortgage Choice Limited
P D Ritchie
S J Clancy
P G Higgins
R G Higgins
S C Jermyn
D E Ralston 
Balance at the 
start of the 
year
Received 
during the year 
on the vesting 
of shares
Other changes 
during the year
Balance at the 
end of the year
390,125
50,000
652,939
15,296,215
2,000,000
125,000
–
–
–
–
–
–
120,000
510,125
25,000
75,000
(293,686)
359,253
83,997
15,380,212
–
2,000,000
20,000
145,000
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201538
2015
Name
Key management personnel of the Group
J L Flavell
M I Russell
S R Mitchell
N C Rose–Innes
A J Russell
M J McCarney
Balance at the 
start of the 
year
Received 
during the year 
on the vesting 
of shares
Other changes 
during the year
Balance at the 
end of the year
–
–
–
–
617,955
380,985
(445,319)
553,621
55,607
119,117
25,000
–
87,255
(92,862)
50,000
75,916
(125,800)
69,233
53,314
1,900
–
–
78,314
1,900
Shareholdings of Directors and other key management personnel of the Group include those that have been disclosed 
under representation made to them by the parties. The Directors and other key management personnel have relied 
upon the representations made as they have no control or influence over the financial affairs of the personally related 
entities to substantiate the shareholdings declared. Where shareholdings of former staff and their personally related 
entities have not been obtained, other changes during the year are assumed to be nil.
Shares under option
There were no unissued ordinary shares of Mortgage Choice Limited under option at the date of this report.
Shares provided on exercise of remuneration options
No options issued to key management personnel were exercised during the year.
Insurance of Directors and Officers
Insurance premiums were paid for the year ended 30 June 2015 in respect of Directors’ and Officers’ liability and 
legal expenses for Directors and Officers of the Company and all controlled entities. The insurance contract prohibits 
disclosure of the premium paid. The insurance premiums relate to:
  Costs and expenses incurred by relevant Directors and Officers in defending any proceedings; and
  Other liabilities that may arise from their position, with the exception of conduct involving dishonesty, wrongful 
acts, or improper use of information or position to gain personal advantage.
The Company has entered into deeds of access, insurance and indemnity with the Directors, the Chief Executive 
Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and Company Secretary. The indemnity is subject to the restrictions prescribed in the 
Corporations Act. Subject to the terms of the deed, it also gives each executive a right of access to certain documents 
and requires the Company to maintain insurance cover for the executives.
No indemnities were paid to current or former officers or auditors during or since the end of the year.
Proceedings on behalf of the Company
No person has applied to the Court under section 237 of the Corporations Act 2001 for leave to bring proceedings on 
behalf of the Company, or to intervene in any proceedings to which the Company is a party, for the purpose of taking 
responsibility on behalf of the Company for all or part of those proceedings. No proceedings have been brought or 
intervened in on behalf of the Company with leave of the Court under section 237 of the Corporations Act 2001.
Non-audit services
The Company may decide to employ the auditor on assignments in addition to their statutory audit duties where the 
auditor’s expertise and experience with the Company or Group are important. Details of the amounts paid or payable 
to the auditor (Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu) for non-audit services provided during the year are set out in note 23.
The Board of Directors has considered the position and, in accordance with the advice received from the audit 
committee, is satisfied that the provision of the non-audit services is compatible with the general standard of 
Directors’ ReportFor the year ended 30 June 201539
independence for auditors imposed by the Corporations Act 2001. The Directors are satisfied that the provision 
of non-audit services by the auditor, as set out below in note 23, did not compromise the auditor independence 
requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 as none of the services undermine the general principles relating to auditor 
independence as set out in APES 110 Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants.
Auditor’s independence declaration
A copy of the auditor’s independence declaration as required under section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001 is set out 
on page 40.
Rounding
The Company is of a kind referred to in Class Order 98/100 issued by the Australian Securities & Investments 
Commission, relating to the “rounding off” of amounts in the Directors’ report. Amounts in the Directors’ report have 
been rounded off in accordance with that Class Order to the nearest thousand dollars, or in certain cases, to the 
nearest dollar.
Auditor
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu continues in office in accordance with section 327 of the Corporations Act 2001.
This report is made in accordance with a resolution of the Directors.
Rodney Higgins 
Director
Sydney 
18 August 2015
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201540
Auditor’s Independence Declaration
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
A.B.N. 74 490 121 060
Grosvenor Place
225 George Street
Sydney, NSW 2000
PO Box N250 Grosvenor Place
Sydney NSW 1220 Australia
DX 10307SSE
Tel:  +61 (0) 2 9322 7000
Fax:  +61 (0) 2 9322 7001
www.deloitte.com.au
The Board of Directors
Mortgage Choice Limited
100 Pacific Highway
Sydney NSW 2000
18 August 2015
Dear Board Members
Mortgage Choice Limited
In accordance with section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001, I am pleased to provide the
following declaration of independence to the directors of Mortgage Choice Limited.
As lead audit partner for the audit of the financial statements of Mortgage Choice Limited for the
financial year ended 30 June 2015, I declare that to the best of my knowledge and belief, there
have been no contraventions of:
(i)
the auditor independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001 in relation to
the audit; and
(ii) any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit.
Yours sincerely
DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU
Philip Hardy
Partner
Chartered Accountants
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.
Auditor’s Independence DeclarationFor the year ended 30 June 2015Financial Statements
41
Consolidated Income Statement
for the year ended 30 June 2015
Revenue
Origination commission
Trailing commission excluding discount unwind
Trailing commission discount unwind
Diversified products commission
Help Me Choose income excluding discount unwind
Help Me Choose income discount unwind
Financial Planning income
Franchise income
Interest
Other income
Direct costs
Origination commission
Trailing commission excluding discount unwind
Trailing commission discount unwind – finance costs
Diversified products commission
Help Me Choose direct costs
Financial planning commission
Gross profit
Operating Expenses
Sales
Technology
Marketing
Finance
Corporate
Profit before income tax
Income tax expense
Profit for the period from continuing operations
Discontinued operation
Profit/(loss) for the period from discontinued operation
Net profit attributable to the owners of Mortgage Choice Limited
Earnings per share 
From continuing and discontinued operations
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
From continuing operations
Basic earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
Notes
6
69,997
70,298
22,192
6,387
5,729
83
5,996
1,504
487
2,122
63,014
74,958
23,577
5,691
4,468
119
2,896
1,522
538
1,681
184,795
178,464
(51,492)
(42,773)
(13,444)
(4,820)
(2,045)
(4,838)
65,383
(16,653)
(6,335)
(8,887)
(2,107)
(4,893)
26,508
(7,652)
18,856
–
18,856
Cents
15.2
15.2
15.2
15.2
(45,777)
(47,712)
(14,129)
(4,483)
(1,277)
(2,341)
62,745
(13,938)
(5,185)
(8,675)
(2,094)
(6,057)
26,796
(8,249)
18,547
1,252
19,799
Cents
16.0
16.0
15.0
15.0
7
8
8
9
5
30
30
30
30
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 2015The above consolidated income statement should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes. 
 
 
 
42
Consolidated Statement of  
Comprehensive Income
for the year ended 30 June 2015
Profit for the year
Other comprehensive income
Total comprehensive income attributable to the owners of 
Mortgage Choice Limited
Notes
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
 18,856 
19,799
–
–
18,856
19,799
Financial StatementsFor the year ended 30 June 2015The above consolidated statement of comprehensive income should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.43
Consolidated Balance Sheet
as at 30 June 2015
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Total current assets
Non-current assets
Receivables
Property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets
Total non-current assets
Total assets
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables
Current tax liabilities
Provisions
Total current liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Trade and other payables
Deferred tax liabilities
Provisions
Total non-current liabilities
Total liabilities
Net assets
EQUITY
Contributed equity
Reserves
Retained profits
Total equity
Notes
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
10
11
11
12
14
15
16
17
18
16
19
20(a)
20(b)
7,827
100,399
108,226
12,445
98,876
111,321
238,209
238,244
826
7,148
907
2,349
246,183
241,500
354,409
352,821
69,931
66,702
119
1,305
71,355
2,418
1,103
70,223
142,895
142,900
37,476
36,605
771
762
181,142
180,267
252,497
250,490
101,912
102,331
5,780
1,909
94,223
101,912
4,604
2,210
95,517
102,331
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 2015The above consolidated balance sheet should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes. 
 
44
Consolidated Statement of Changes 
in Equity
for the year ended 30 June 2015
Notes
Contributed 
equity 
$’000
Reserves 
$’000
Retained 
earnings 
$’000
Total 
$’000
Balance at 30 June 2013
4,018
1,472
93,642
99,132
Total comprehensive income for 
the year as reported in the 2014 
financial statements
Transactions with equity holders in 
their capacity as owners:
Contributions of equity net of 
transaction costs
Dividends paid 
Employee share options – value of 
employee services
Balance at 30 June 2014
Total comprehensive income for 
the year as reported in the 2015 
financial statements
Transactions with equity holders in 
their capacity as owners:
Contributions of equity net of 
transaction costs
Dividends paid 
Adjustment for provision 
for clawbacks
Employee share options – value of 
employee services
Balance at 30 June 2015
19
21
31
19
21
20
31
–
–
19,799
19,799
586
(586)
–
–
–
–
586
4,604
–
(17,924)
(17,924)
1,324
738
2,210
–
1,324
(17,924)
(16,600)
95,517
102,331
–
–
18,856
18,856
1,176
(1,176)
–
–
–
–
–
1,176
5,780
–
–
875
(301)
(19,227)
(19,227)
(923)
(923)
–
875
(20,150)
(19,275)
1,909
94,223
101,912
Financial StatementsFor the year ended 30 June 2015The above consolidated statement of changes in equity should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.45
Consolidated statement of 
Cash Flows
for the year ended 30 June 2015
Notes
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
Cash flows from operating activities
Receipts from customers (inclusive of goods and services tax)
198,237
180,722
Payments to suppliers and employees (inclusive of goods and 
services tax)
Income taxes paid
(168,218)
(154,018)
30,019
26,704
(8,684)
(7,612)
Net cash inflow from operating activities
29
21,335
19,092
Cash flows from investing activities
Payments for property, plant, equipment and intangibles
(7,213)
(1,909)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment
Proceeds from sale of LoanKit net of selling costs
Interest received
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities
Dividends paid to company’s shareholders
Net cash (outflow) from financing activities
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the financial year
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of year
10
–
–
487
(6,726)
–
1,695
538
324
(19,227)
(17,924)
(19,227)
(17,924)
(4,618)
12,445
7,827
1,492
10,953
12,445
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 2015The above consolidated statement cash flows should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes. 
 
46
Notes to the Consolidated 
Financial Statements
Note 1: Summary of 
significant accounting 
policies
The principal accounting policies adopted in the 
preparation of these consolidated financial statements 
are set out below. These policies have been 
consistently applied to all the years presented, unless 
otherwise stated. The financial statements are for the 
consolidated entity consisting of Mortgage Choice 
Limited and its subsidiaries.
A.  Basis of preparation
These general purpose financial statements have been 
prepared in accordance with Australian Accounting 
Standards and Interpretations issued by the Australian 
Accounting Standards Board and the Corporations Act 
2001. The financial statements comprise the consolidated 
financial statements for the Group. For the purposes of 
preparing the consolidated financial statements, the 
Company is a for-profit entity.
Compliance with IFRS
The consolidated financial statements of the Group have 
been prepared in accordance with International Financial 
Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued by the International 
Accounting Standards Board (IASB).
New and amended standards adopted by the group
In the current year, the Group has applied a number of 
amendments to AASBs and a new Interpretation issued 
by the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) 
that are mandatorily effective for an accounting period 
that begins on or after 1 July 2015, and therefore relevant 
for the current year end.
AASB 2013-3 Amendments to AASB136 Recoverable 
Amount Disclosures for Non-Financial Assets. The 
amendments to AASB 136 remove the requirement to 
disclose the recoverable amount of a cash-generating 
unit (CGU) to which goodwill or other intangible assets 
with indefinite useful lives had been allocated when 
there has been no impairment or reversal of impairment 
of the related CGU. Furthermore, the amendments 
introduce additional disclosure requirements applicable 
to when the recoverable amount of an asset or a CGU 
is measured at fair value less costs of disposal. These 
new disclosures include the fair value hierarchy, key 
assumptions and valuation techniques used which 
are in line with the disclosure required by AASB 13 Fair 
Value Measurements.
The application of these amendments does not have 
any material impact on the disclosures in the Group’s 
consolidated financial statements.
AASB 2014-1 Amendments to Australian Accounting 
Standards (Part A: Annual Improvements 2010-2012 and 
2011-2013 Cycles). The Annual Improvements 2010-2012 
has made number of amendments to various AASBs, 
including the amendments to AASB 2 (i) which change 
the definitions of ‘vesting condition’ and ‘market 
condition and (ii) which add definitions of ‘performance 
condition’ and ‘service condition’ which were previously 
included with the definition of ’vesting condition’. The 
amendments to AASB 2 are effective for sharebased 
payment transactions for which the grant date is on or 
after 1 July 2014.
AASB 1031 Materiality, AASB 2013-9 Amendments 
to Australian Accounting Standards – Conceptual 
Framework, Materiality and Financial Instruments (Part 
B: Materiality), AASB 2014-1 Amendments to Australian 
Accounting Standards (Part C: Materiality). The revised 
AASB 1031 is an interim standard that cross-references to 
other Standards and the Framework for the Preparation 
and Presentation of Financial Statements (issued 
December 2013) that contain guidance on materiality. 
The AASB is progressively removing references to AASB 
1031 in all Standards and Interpretations. Once all of 
these references have been removed, AASB 1031 will be 
withdrawn. The adoption of AASB 1031, AASB 2013-9 (Part 
B) and AASB 2014-1 (Part C) does not have any material 
impact on the disclosures or the amounts recognised in 
the Group’s consolidated financial statements.
Historical cost convention
These financial statements have been prepared under 
the historical cost convention, as modified by the 
revaluation of financial assets and liabilities (including 
derivative instruments) at fair value through profit 
and loss.
Critical accounting estimates
The preparation of financial statements requires the use 
of certain critical accounting estimates. It also requires 
management to exercise its judgement in the process 
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsFor the year ended 30 June 201547
of applying the Group’s accounting policies. The areas 
involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or 
areas where assumptions and estimates are significant 
to the financial statements are disclosed in note 3.
B.  Principles of consolidation
(i)  Subsidiaries
The consolidated financial statements incorporate 
the financial statements of the Company and entities 
(including structured entities) controlled by the 
Company and its subsidiaries. Control is achieved when 
the Company:
  has power over the investee;
  is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from 
its involvement with the investee; and
  has the ability to use its power to affect its returns.
The Company reassesses whether or not it controls an 
investee if facts and circumstances indicate that there 
are changes to one or more of the three elements of 
control listed above.
The acquisition method of accounting is used to 
account for business combinations by the Group (refer 
to note 1(G)). 
Intercompany transactions, balances and unrealised 
gains on transactions between Group companies are 
eliminated. Unrealised losses are also eliminated unless 
the transaction provides evidence of the impairment of 
the asset transferred.
(ii)  Employee Share Trust
The Group has formed two trusts to administer the 
Group’s employee share scheme. These trusts are 
consolidated as the substance of the relationship is that 
the trusts are controlled by the Group.
Shares held by the employee share scheme are disclosed 
as treasury shares and deducted from contributed equity 
in both the consolidated and company accounts.
C.  Segment reporting
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent 
with the internal reporting provided to the chief 
operating decision maker. The chief operating decision 
maker, who is responsible for allocating resources and 
assessing performance of the operating segments, has 
been identified as the Chief Executive Officer.
D.  Revenue recognition
Revenue is measured at the fair value of the 
consideration received or receivable.
The Company provides loan origination services 
through its franchise network and receives origination 
commission on the settlement of loans. Additionally, the 
lender will normally pay a trailing commission over the 
life of the loan. Revenue over the estimated life of loans 
written is recognised on the settlement of the loans as 
no additional services are required to receive the entitled 
funds. Additionally, the Company earns income from the 
sale of franchises and franchisee services. 
Revenue from sale of services is recognised as follows:
(i)  Origination commissions arising from mortgage 
broking activities
Origination commissions received by the Company 
are recognised as revenue on settlement of the loan. 
Commissions may be “clawed back” by lenders at a later 
date as per their individual policies. These potential 
clawbacks are estimated and recognised at the same 
time as origination commission.
(ii)  Trailing commissions arising from mortgage 
broking activities
The Company receives trailing commissions from 
lenders over the life of the settled loans in its loan 
book based on outstanding balance. The Company 
makes trailing commission payments to franchisees 
based on the outstanding loan book balance of the 
individual franchisees.
On initial recognition at settlement, trailing commission 
revenue and the related receivable are recognised at fair 
value being the net present value of the expected future 
trailing commissions to be received. An associated 
expense and payable to the franchisees are also 
recognised initially measured at fair value being the net 
present value of the expected future trailing commission 
payable to franchisees.
Subsequent to initial recognition and measurement, 
both the trailing commission receivable and payable are 
measured at amortised cost. The carrying amounts of 
the receivable and payable are adjusted to reflect actual 
and revised estimated cash flows by recalculating the 
net present value of estimated future cash flows at the 
original effective interest rate. Any resulting adjustment 
to the carrying value is recognised as income or expense 
in the income statement. 
(iii)  Franchise fee income 
Franchise fee income is derived from the sale of 
franchises by the Company and comprises licence 
fees and contributions for training, franchise 
consumables and compliance costs. Licence fees are 
partially repayable should franchisees terminate their 
franchise agreement in accordance with a repayment 
schedule as defined in the agreement. Licence fee 
income is recognised in accordance with this schedule. 
Contributions for training, consumables and compliance 
costs are recognised as revenue on receipt. Licence fees 
which may be repayable to franchisees at the balance 
sheet date are included in liabilities.
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201548
Note 1: Summary of significant accounting 
polies (continued)
(iv)  Health sales income
The Group receives origination and trailing commission 
for health insurance policies sold through its comparison 
website. The recognition of this revenue is consistent 
with mortgage origination and trailing commissions 
arising from mortgage broking activities detailed in (i) 
and (ii) above.
(v)  Mortgage lead income
The Group sells leads generated by its comparison 
website to mortgage brokers. This income is recognised 
at the time the lead is delivered.
(vi)  Financial services revenue
Financial services revenue is derived from the provision 
of financial advice and from commission revenue from 
insurance products. Revenue from the provision of 
financial services is recognised at the time the service 
is provided.
(vii)  Interest income
Interest income is recognised using the effective interest 
method. When a receivable is impaired, the Group 
reduces the carrying amount to its recoverable amount, 
being the estimated future cash flow discounted at the 
original effective interest rate of the instrument, and 
continues unwinding the discount as interest income.
(viii)  Other income
Other income includes contributions from lenders 
towards conferences and workshops which are 
recognised as income in the period the conference or 
workshop is held. Also included in this category are 
other non-operating revenues recognised in the period 
to which the income relates.
E.  Income tax
The income tax expense for the period is the tax payable 
on the current period’s taxable income, based on 
the applicable income tax rate adjusted by changes 
in deferred tax assets and liabilities attributable to 
temporary differences.
The current income tax charge is calculated on the 
basis of the tax laws substantively enacted at the end 
of the reporting period. Management periodically 
evaluates positions taken in tax returns with respect to 
situations in which applicable tax regulation is subject 
to interpretation. It establishes provisions where 
appropriate on the basis of amounts expected to be paid 
to the tax authorities.
Deferred income tax is provided in full, using the liability 
method, on temporary differences arising between 
the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying 
amounts in the consolidated financial statements. 
However, the deferred income tax is not accounted for if 
it arises from initial recognition of an asset or liability in 
a transaction, other than a business combination, that at 
the time of the transaction affects neither accounting nor 
taxable profit or loss. Deferred income tax is determined 
using tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted or 
substantially enacted by the balance sheet date and are 
expected to apply when the related deferred income 
tax asset is realised or the deferred income tax liability 
is settled.
Deferred tax assets are recognised for deductible 
temporary differences only if it is probable that future 
taxable amounts will be available to utilise those 
temporary differences and losses.
Deferred tax liabilities and assets are not recognised for 
temporary differences between the carrying amount and 
tax bases of investments in controlled entities where the 
parent entity is able to control the timing of the reversal 
of the temporary differences and it is probable that the 
differences will not reverse in the foreseeable future.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there 
is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets 
and liabilities and when the deferred tax balances relate 
to the same taxation authority. Current tax assets and 
tax liabilities are offset where the entity has a legally 
enforceable right to offset and intends either to settle 
on a net basis, or to realise the asset and settle the 
liability simultaneously.
Mortgage Choice Limited and its wholly-owned 
controlled entities have elected to consolidate under the 
tax consolidation legislation. As a consequence, these 
entities are taxed as a single entity and the deferred tax 
assets and liabilities of these entities are set off in the 
consolidated financial statements.
Current and deferred tax is recognised in profit or loss, 
except to the extent that it relates to items recognised in 
other comprehensive income or directly in equity. In this 
case the tax is also recognised in other comprehensive or 
directly in equity, respectively.
(i)  Investment allowances
Companies within the group may be entitled to claim 
special tax deductions for investments in qualifying 
assets or in relation to qualifying expenditure (eg 
the Research and Development Tax Incentive regime 
in Australia or other investment allowances). The 
group accounts for such allowances as tax credits, 
which means that the allowance reduces income tax 
payable and current tax expense. A deferred tax asset 
is recognised for unclaimed tax credits that are carried 
forward as deferred tax assets.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsFor the year ended 30 June 201549
(ii)  Tax consolidation legislation
Mortgage Choice Limited and its wholly owned 
Australian controlled entities are members of a 
consolidated group for income tax purposes.
The head entity Mortgage Choice Limited and the 
controlled entities in the tax consolidated group account 
for their own current and deferred tax amounts. These 
tax amounts are measured as if each entity in the 
tax consolidated group continues to be a standalone 
taxpayer in its own right.
In addition to its own current and deferred tax amounts, 
Mortgage Choice Limited also recognises current tax 
liabilities or assets, and deferred tax assets arising from 
unused tax losses and unused tax credits assumed from 
controlled entities in the tax consolidated group.
F.  Leases
Leases of property, plant and equipment, where the 
Group as lessee has substantially all the risks and 
rewards of ownership, are classified as finance leases. 
Finance leases are capitalised at the lease’s inception at 
the lower of the fair value of the leased property and 
the present value of the minimum lease payments. The 
corresponding rental obligations, net of finance charges, 
are included in other long term payables. Each lease 
payment is allocated between the liability and finance 
charges so as to achieve a constant rate on the finance 
balance outstanding. The interest element of the finance 
cost is charged to the income statement over the lease 
period so as to produce a constant periodic rate of 
interest on the remaining balance of the liability for each 
period. The property, plant and equipment acquired 
under finance leases is depreciated over the shorter of 
the asset’s useful life and the lease term.
Leases in which a significant portion of the risks and 
rewards of ownership are not transferred to the Group as 
lessee are classified as operating leases. Payments made 
under operating leases (net of any incentives received 
from the lessor) are charged to the income statement on 
a straight-line basis over the period of the lease.
G.  Business combinations
The acquisition method of accounting is used to account 
for all business combinations regardless of whether 
equity instruments or other assets are acquired. The 
consideration transferred for an acquisition comprises 
the fair values of the assets transferred, the liabilities 
incurred and the equity interests issued by the Group. 
The consideration also includes the fair value of any 
contingent consideration arrangement and the fair value 
of any pre-existing equity interest in the subsidiary. 
Acquisition related costs are expensed as incurred. 
Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities and contingent 
liabilities assumed in a business combination are, with 
limited exceptions, measured initially at their fair values 
at the acquisition date. On an acquisition by acquisition 
basis, the Group recognises any non-controlling 
interest in the acquiree either at fair value or at the 
non-controlling interest’s proportionate share in the 
acquiree’s net identifiable assets.
The excess of the consideration transferred and the 
amount of any non-controlling interest in the acquiree 
over the fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired 
is recorded as goodwill. If those amounts are less 
than the fair value of the net identifiable assets of 
the subsidiary acquired and the measurement of all 
amounts has been reviewed, the difference is recognised 
directly in profit or loss as a bargain purchase.
Where settlement of any part of cash consideration 
is deferred, the amounts payable in the future are 
discounted to their present value as at the date 
of exchange. The discount rate used is the entity’s 
incremental borrowing rate, being the rate at which 
a similar borrowing could be obtained from an 
independent financier under comparable terms 
and conditions.
Contingent consideration is classified either as equity 
or a financial liability. Amounts classified as a financial 
liability are subsequently remeasured to fair value with 
changes in fair value recognised in profit or loss.
H.  Impairment of assets
At the end of each reporting period, the Group reviews 
the carrying amounts of its tangible and intangible 
assets to determine whether there is any indication 
that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If 
any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of 
the asset is estimated in order to determine the extent 
of the impairment loss (if any). When it is not possible 
to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual 
asset, the Group estimates the recoverable amount of 
the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. 
When a reasonable and consistent basis of allocation 
can be identified, corporate assets are also allocated to 
individual cash-generating units, or otherwise they are 
allocated to the smallest group of cash-generating units 
for which a reasonable and consistent allocation basis 
can be identified.
Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives and 
intangible assets not yet available for use are tested for 
impairment at least annually, and whenever there is an 
indication that the asset may be impaired. Recoverable 
amount is the higher of fair value less costs of disposal 
and value in use. In assessing value in use, the estimated 
future cash flows are discounted to their present value 
using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects current market 
assessments of the time value of money and the risks 
specific to the asset for which the estimates of future 
cash flows have not been adjusted.
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201550
Note 1: Summary of significant accounting 
polies (continued)
If the recoverable amount of an asset (or cash-generating 
unit) is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, 
the carrying amount of the asset (or cash-generating 
unit) is reduced to its recoverable amount. An 
impairment loss is recognised immediately in profit or 
loss, unless the relevant asset is carried at a revalued 
amount, in which case the impairment loss is treated as 
a revaluation decrease.
I.  Cash and cash equivalents
For cash flow statement presentation purposes, cash 
and cash equivalents includes cash on hand, deposits 
held at call with financial institutions, other short-
term, highly liquid investments with original maturities 
of three months or less that are readily convertible 
to known amounts of cash and which are subject to 
an insignificant risk of changes in value. Overdrafts 
are shown in borrowings in current liabilities on the 
balance sheet.
J.  Trade receivables
Trade receivables are recognised initially at fair value 
and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the 
effective interest method, less provision for impairment. 
Trade receivables are generally due in 30 days.
Collectability of receivables is reviewed on an ongoing 
basis. Debts which are known to be uncollectible 
are written off. A provision for impairment of trade 
receivables is established when there is objective 
evidence that the Group will not be able to collect 
all amounts due according to the original terms 
of receivables. The amount of the provision is the 
difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the 
present value of estimated future cash flows, discounted 
at the original effective interest rate. Cash flows relating 
to short term receivables are not discounted if the 
effect of discounting is immaterial. The amount of the 
provision is recognised in the income statement in 
other expenses.
K.  Trailing commissions receivable
Receivables related to trailing commissions are 
recognised in accordance with the revenue recognition 
policy outlined in note 1(D). 
L.  Investments and other financial assets
The Group classifies its investments in the following 
categories: financial assets at fair value through 
profit or loss, loans and receivables, held to maturity 
investments, and available for sale financial assets. The 
classification depends on the purpose for which the 
investments were acquired. Management determines 
the classification of its investments at initial recognition 
and, in the case of assets classified as held to maturity, 
re evaluates this designation at each reporting date.
Loans and receivables
Loans and receivables are non derivative financial 
assets with fixed or determinable payments that are not 
quoted in an active market. They are included in current 
assets, except for those with maturities greater than 
twelve months after the balance sheet date which are 
classified as non current assets. Loans and receivables 
are included in trade and other receivables in the 
balance sheet (note 11).
M.  Property, plant and equipment
All property, plant and equipment is stated at 
historical cost less depreciation. Historical cost 
includes expenditure that is directly attributable to the 
acquisition of the items. 
Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s 
carrying amount or recognised as a separate asset, 
as appropriate, only when it is probable that future 
economic benefits associated with the item will flow 
to the Group and the cost of the item can be measured 
reliably. The carrying amount of the replaced part is 
derecognised. All other repairs and maintenance are 
charged to the income statement during the financial 
period in which they are incurred.
Depreciation on other assets is calculated using the 
straight line method to allocate their cost or revalued 
amounts, net of their residual values, over their 
estimated useful lives or, in the case of leasehold 
improvements, the shorter lease term as follows:
Office equipment 
Computer equipment 
Furniture and fittings 
5-10 years
3-4 years
5-15 years
The assets’ residual values and useful lives are reviewed, 
and adjusted if appropriate, at each balance sheet date.
An asset’s carrying amount is written down 
immediately to its recoverable amount if the asset’s 
carrying amount is greater than its estimated 
recoverable amount (note 1(H)).
Gains and losses on disposals are determined by 
comparing proceeds with carrying amount. These are 
included in the income statement. 
N.  Intangible assets
Software
Acquired computer software licences are capitalised on 
the basis of the costs incurred to acquire and bring to 
use the specific software. These costs are amortised over 
their estimated useful lives (three to seven years).
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsFor the year ended 30 June 201551
Costs associated with developing or maintaining 
computer software programmes are recognised as an 
expense as incurred. Costs that are directly associated 
with the production of identifiable and unique software 
products controlled by the Group, and that will probably 
generate future economic benefits exceeding costs 
beyond one year, are recognised as intangible assets.
Computer software development costs recognised as 
assets are amortised over their estimated useful lives. 
O.  Trade and other payables
These amounts represent liabilities for goods and 
services provided to the consolidated entity prior to 
the end of the financial year and which are unpaid. The 
amounts are unsecured and are usually paid within 30 
days of recognition.
P.  Trailing commissions payable
Payables related to trailing commissions are recognised 
in accordance with the revenue recognition policy 
outlined in note 1(D).
Q.  Borrowing costs
Borrowing costs are recognised as expenses using the 
effective interest method.
R.  Provisions
Provisions for legal claims and make good obligations 
are recognised when the Group has a present legal or 
constructive obligation as a result of past events, it is 
probable that an outflow of resources will be required to 
settle the obligation and the amount has been reliably 
estimated. Provisions are not recognised for future 
operating losses.
Provisions are measured at the present value of 
management’s best estimate of the expenditure required 
to settle the present obligation at the balance sheet date. 
The discount rate used to determine the present value 
reflects current market assessments of the time value of 
money and the risks specific to the liability. The increase 
in the provision due to the passage of time is recognised 
as interest expense.
S.  Employee benefits
Short term obligations
Liabilities for wages and salaries, including non 
monetary benefits and annual leave expected to be 
settled within twelve months after the end of the period 
in which the employees render the related service, are 
recognised in respect of employees’ services up to the 
end of the reporting period and are measured at the 
amounts expected to be paid. The liability for annual 
leave is included in provisions. The liability for all other 
short-term employee benefits is included in trade and 
other payables.
Other long-term employee benefit obligations
The liability for long service leave and any annual leave, 
which is not expected to be settled within 12 months 
after the end of the period in which the employees 
render the related service, is recognised in the provisions 
and measured as the present value of expected future 
payments to be made in respect of services provided by 
employees up to the end of the reporting period using 
the projected unit credit method. Consideration is given 
to expected future wage and salary levels, experience of 
employee departures and periods of service. Expected 
future payments are discounted using market yields at 
the reporting period on national government bonds with 
terms and currency that match, as closely as possible, 
the estimated future cash outflows.
The obligations are presented as current liabilities 
in the balance sheet if the entity does not have an 
unconditional right to defer settlement for at least 
twelve months after the reporting date, regardless of 
when the actual settlement is expected to occur.
Retirement benefit obligations
Contributions to the defined contribution fund are 
recognised as an expense as they become payable. 
Prepaid contributions are recognised as an asset to the 
extent that a cash refund or a reduction in the future 
payments is available.
Share-based payments
Share based compensation benefits are provided 
to employees via the Mortgage Choice Executive 
Performance Option Plan, the Mortgage Choice 
Performance Share Plan and the Mortgage Choice Share 
Rights Plan. Information relating to these schemes is set 
out in note 31.
The fair value of options granted under the Mortgage 
Choice Executive Performance Option Plan, performance 
shares granted under the Mortgage Choice Performance 
Share Plan and share rights granted under the Mortgage 
Choice Share Rights Plan is recognised as an employee 
benefit expense with a corresponding increase in 
equity. The total amount to be expensed is determined 
by reference to the fair value of the options and 
performance shares granted, which includes any market 
performance conditions but excludes the impact of any 
service and non-market performance vesting conditions 
and the impact of any non-vesting conditions.
Non-market vesting conditions are included in 
assumptions about the number of options that are 
expected to vest. The total expense is recognised over 
the vesting period, which is the period over which all of 
the specified vesting conditions are to be satisfied. At 
the end of each period, the entity revises its estimates of 
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201552
Note 1: Summary of significant accounting 
polies (continued)
the number of options that are expected to vest based 
on the non-marketing vesting conditions. It recognises 
the impact of the revision to original estimates, if any, 
in profit or loss, with a corresponding adjustment 
to equity.
The Mortgage Choice Executive Performance Option 
Plan, the Mortgage Choice Performance Share Plan and 
the Mortgage Choice Share Rights Plan are administered 
by the Mortgage Choice Performance Share Plan Trust 
and the Mortgage Choice Employee Incentive Trust; see 
note 1(B)(ii).
Short term incentive plans
The Group recognises a liability and an expense where 
contractually obliged or where there is a past practice 
that it has created a constructive obligation.
Termination benefits
Termination benefits are payable when employment is 
terminated before the normal retirement date, or when 
an employee accepts voluntary redundancy in exchange 
for these benefits. The Group recognises termination 
benefits when it is demonstrably committed to either 
terminating the employment of current employees 
according to a detailed formal plan without possibility of 
withdrawal or providing termination benefits as a result 
of an offer made to encourage voluntary redundancy. 
Benefits falling due more than twelve months after 
balance sheet date are discounted to present value.
T.  Contributed equity
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental 
costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares 
or options are shown in equity as a deduction, net 
of tax, from the proceeds. Incremental costs directly 
attributable to the issue of new shares or option for the 
acquisition of a business are not included in the cost of 
the acquisition as part of the purchase consideration.
Where any group company purchases the company’s 
equity instruments, for example as the result of a 
share buy-back or a share-based payment plan, the 
consideration paid, including any directly attributable 
incremental costs (net of income taxes) is deducted 
from equity attributable to the owners of Mortgage 
Choice Limited as treasury shares until the shares are 
cancelled or reissued. Where such ordinary shares are 
subsequently reissued, any consideration received, net 
of any directly attributable incremental transaction costs 
and the related income tax effects, is included in equity 
attributable to the owners of Mortgage Choice Limited. 
U.  Dividends
Provision is made for the amount of any dividend 
declared, that is approved by the Directors on or before 
the end of the financial year but not yet paid at the 
reporting date.
V.  Earnings per share
(i)  Basic earnings per share
Basic earnings per share is determined by dividing net 
profit after income tax attributable to members of the 
Company, excluding any costs of servicing equity other 
than ordinary shares, by the weighted average number 
of ordinary shares outstanding during the financial year, 
adjusted for bonus elements in ordinary shares issued 
during the year.
(ii)  Diluted earnings per share
Diluted earnings per share adjusts the figures used in 
the determination of basic earnings per share to take 
into account the after income tax effect of interest 
and other financing costs associated with dilutive 
potential ordinary shares and the weighted average 
number of shares assumed to have been issued for 
no consideration in relation to dilutive potential 
ordinary shares.
W.  Goods and Services Tax (GST)
Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the 
amount of associated GST, unless the GST incurred is not 
recoverable from the taxation authority. In this case it is 
recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of the asset 
or as part of the expense. Receivables and payables 
are stated inclusive of the amount of GST receivable or 
payable. The net amount of GST recoverable from, or 
payable to, the taxation authority is included with other 
receivables or payables in the balance sheet.
Cash flows are presented on a gross basis. The GST 
components of cash flows arising from investing or 
financing activities which are recoverable from, or 
payable to the taxation authority, are presented as 
operating cash flow.
X.  Rounding of amounts
The Company is of a kind referred to in Class Order 
98/100, issued by the Australian Securities & Investments 
Commission, relating to the “rounding off” of amounts 
in the financial statements. Amounts in the financial 
statements have been rounded off in accordance with 
that Class Order to the nearest thousand dollars, or in 
certain cases, to the nearest dollar.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsFor the year ended 30 June 201553
Y.  New accounting standards and interpretations
At the date of authorisation of the financial statements, the Standards and Interpretations listed below were in issue 
but not yet effective.
Standard/Interpretation
Effective for annual reporting 
periods beginning on or after
Expected to be initially applied 
in the financial year ending
AASB 15 ‘Revenue from Contract with Customers’ and 
AASB 2014-5’ Amendments to Australian Accounting 
Standards arising from AASB 15
AASB 2014-4 ‘Amendments to Australian Accounting 
Standards – Clarification of Acceptable Methods of 
Depreciation and Amortisation’
AASB 2015-1 Amendments to Australian Accounting 
Standards Annual Improvements to Australian 
Accounting Standards 2012-2014 Cycle’
AASB 2015-2 ‘Amendments to Australian 
Accounting Standards – Disclosure Initiative 
Amendments to AASB101’
AASB 2015-3 ‘Amendments to Australian 
Accounting Standards arising from the Withdrawal of 
AASB 1031 Materiality’
AASB 9 ‘Financial Instruments’, and the relevant 
amending standards
1 January 2017
30 June 2018
1 January 2016
30 June 2017
1 January 2016
30 June 2017
1 January 2016
30 June 2017
1 January 2015
30 June 2016
1 January 2018
30 June 2019
The potential effect of the revised Standards/Interpretations on the Group’s financial statements has not yet 
been determined
At the date of publication, there have been no IASB Standards or IFRIC Interpretations that are issued but not 
yet effective.
Z.  Parent entity financial information
The financial information for the parent entity, Mortgage Choice Limited, disclosed in note 32 has been prepared on the 
same basis as the consolidated financial statements, except as set out below.
Investments in subsidiaries, associates and joint venture entities
Investments in subsidiaries, associates and joint venture entities are accounted for at cost in the financial statements 
of Mortgage Choice Limited. Dividends received from subsidiaries and associates are recognised in the parent entity’s 
profit or loss when its right to receive the dividend is established.
Tax consolidation legislation
Mortgage Choice Limited and its wholly-owned Australian controlled entities have implemented the tax 
consolidation legislation.
The head entity, Mortgage Choice Limited, and the controlled entities in the tax consolidated group account for their 
own current and deferred tax amounts. These tax amounts are measured as if each entity in the tax consolidated group 
continues to be a standalone taxpayer in its own right.
In addition to its own current and deferred tax amounts, Mortgage Choice Limited also recognises the current tax 
liabilities (or assets) and the deferred tax assets arising from unused tax losses and unused tax credits assumed from 
controlled entities in the tax consolidated group.
The entities have entered into a tax funding agreement under which the wholly-owned entities fully compensate 
Mortgage Choice Limited for any current tax payable assumed and are compensated by Mortgage Choice Limited 
for any current tax receivable and deferred tax assets relating to unused tax losses or unused tax credits that are 
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201554
Note 1: Summary of significant accounting polies (continued)
transferred to Mortgage Choice Limited under the tax consolidation legislation. The funding amounts are determined 
by reference to the amounts recognised in the wholly-owned entities’ financial statements.
The amounts receivable/payable under the tax funding agreement is due upon receipt of the funding advice from 
the head entity, which is issued as soon as practicable after the end of each financial year. The head entity may also 
require payment of interim funding amounts to assist with its obligations to pay tax instalments.
Assets or liabilities arising under tax funding agreements with the tax consolidated entities are recognised as current 
amounts receivable from or payable to other entities in the group.
Any difference between the amounts assumed and amounts receivable or payable under the tax funding agreement 
are recognised as a contribution to (or distribution from) wholly-owned tax consolidated entities.
Financial guarantees
Where the parent entity has provided financial guarantees in relation to loans and payables of subsidiaries for no 
compensation, the fair values of these guarantees are accounted for as contributions and recognised as part of the cost 
of the investment.
Note 2: Financial risk management
The Group has limited exposure to financial risks with the exception of credit risk and prepayment risk. The Group does 
not use derivative financial instruments such as foreign exchange contracts, interest rate swaps or other derivative 
instruments to hedge risk exposures. It does not operate internationally, does not have any debt or significant interest 
rate exposure and is not exposed to either securities price risk or commodity price risk.
Risk management is carried out by the Group’s finance department under policies approved by the Board of Directors. 
The Group holds the following financial instruments:
Financial Assets
Current
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables*
Non-current
Receivables
*  Excludes prepayments
Financial Liabilities
Current
Trade and other payables
Non -current
Trade and other payables
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
7,827
12,445
98,879
96,903
238,209
238,244
344,915
347,592
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
69,833
66,702
142,895
142,900
212,728
209,602
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsFor the year ended 30 June 201555
The Group’s policies in relation to financial risks to which it has exposure are detailed below.
(a)  Market risk
Interest rate risk
The Group’s main interest rate risk arises from cash and cash equivalents. At 30 June 2015 the weighted average 
interest rate on its cash balances was 2.00% (2014 2.5%). If interest rates were to increase by 100 basis points, the 
Group’s after tax result would increase by $90,000 (2014 $97,000). A decrease of 100 basis points would reduce the 
Group’s after tax result by $90,000 (2014 $97,000).
The Group does not have any borrowings and therefore is not exposed to interest rate risk on borrowings. 
(b)  Credit risk
Credit risk is assessed on a Group basis. It arises from cash and cash equivalents placed with banks as well as credit 
exposure to financial institutions on the Group’s lender panel from which future trailing commissions are due. The 
majority of these financial institutions are Authorised Deposit-taking Institutions (ADIs) and therefore regulated by the 
Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) and are independently rated. This forms the basis of the Group’s 
assessment of credit risk. If the lender has not been independently rated, credit risk is assessed taking into account 
its financial position, past experience and other factors. The table below indicates the Group’s exposure to each 
ratings category.
The Group bears the risk of non-payment of future trailing commissions by lenders should they become insolvent but 
correspondingly, there is no legal requirement to pay franchisees trailing commissions that have not been received. 
The risk profile of the Group is set out in the table below.
2015
ADIs
Non ADIs
Total Receivable
Standard & 
Poor’s Credit 
Rating
Cash and cash 
equivalents 
$’000
Trade and 
franchisee 
receivables 
$’000
NPV Future 
trailing 
commissions 
receivable 
$’000
AA-
A+
A
A-
BBB+
BBB
BBB-
Not rated
AA-
A+
A
A-
BBB+
BBB-
Not rated
7,827 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
–
7,738 
506
87 
1,335 
962 
36
– 
175 
231,723 
20,360 
5,896 
27,697 
20,800 
763 
– 
5,810 
7,827
10,839 
313,049 
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
7,827
102
69
–
42
22
22 
4,111
 4,368
15,207
–
– 
1,265 
– 
– 
658 
5,882
7,805 
320,854
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 2015 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
56
Note 2: Financial risk management (continued)
2014
ADIs
Non ADIs
Standard & 
Poor’s Credit 
Rating
Cash and cash 
equivalents 
$’000
Trade and 
franchisee 
receivables 
$’000
NPV Future 
trailing 
commissions 
receivable 
$’000
AA-
A+
A
A-
BBB+
BBB
BBB-
Not rated
AA-
A+
A
A-
BBB+
Not rated
12,445 
9,021 
232,040 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
– 
–
859
403 
1,161 
1,153 
44
– 
231 
20,915 
4,347 
28,700 
17,873 
1,108 
– 
5,903 
12,445
12,872 
310,886 
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
95
45
10
162 
27
3,948
 4,287
17,159
–
– 
– 
1,368 
– 
4,857
6,225 
317,111
Total Receivable
12,445
(c)  Liquidity risk and fair value estimation
Prudent liquidity risk management implies maintaining sufficient cash and marketable securities. The Group 
manages liquidity risk by continuously monitoring forecast and actual cash flows and matching maturity profiles of 
financial assets and liabilities. Surplus funds are generally only invested in instruments that are tradable in highly 
liquid markets.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsFor the year ended 30 June 2015 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
57
The tables below analyse the Group’s financial assets into relevant maturity groupings based on the expected future 
cashflows. No financial assets are past due or impaired.
At 30 June 2015
Non-derivatives
Interest bearing
Cash and cash equivalents
Franchisee receivables
Non-interest bearing
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade receivables
Franchisee and other receivables
Less than 
6 months 
$,000
6 – 12 
months 
$’000
Between 
1 and 2 
years 
$’000
Between 
2 and 5 
years 
$’000
Over 5 
years 
$’000
Total cash 
flows 
$’000
Carrying 
amount 
$’000
7,824
416
3
12,132
1,216
–
444
–
–
108
–
–
970
1,229
–
–
72
–
–
49
–
–
–
–
–
7,824
7,824
3,059
2,657
3
3
12,132
12,132
1,445
1,445
Future trailing commissions receivable 
45,683
41,982
71,835
136,809
99,913
396,222
320,854
67,274
42,534
72,877
138,087
99,913
420,685
344,915
The fair value of the future trailing commissions receivable is $339,690,000. The fair value of all other assets is the 
same as their carrying amount. The fair value of the future trailing commissions receivable was determined by using a 
discounted cash flow valuation technique, which requires the use of management assumptions as disclosed in Note 3 
with the exception of the discount rate for which management has applied a discount rate of 4.4%. There has been no 
change to the valuation technique during the year.
At 30 June 2014
Non-derivatives
Interest bearing
Cash and cash equivalents
Franchisee receivables
Non-interest bearing
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade receivables
Franchisee and other receivables
Less than 
6 months 
$,000
6 – 12 
months 
$’000
Between 
1 and 2 
years 
$’000
Between 
2 and 5 
years 
$’000
Over 5 
years 
$’000
Total cash 
flows 
$’000
Carrying 
amount 
$’000
12,442
284
–
296
–
–
–
12,442
12,442
628
1,395
718
3,321
2,495
3
14,112
1,349
–
–
6
–
–
23
–
–
51
–
–
–
3
14,112
1,429
3
14,112
1,429
Future trailing commissions receivable 
42,711
40,477
71,912
145,035
98,362
398,497
317,111
70,901
40,779
72,563
146,481
99,080
429,804
347,592
The fair value of the future trailing commissions receivable is $338,578,000. The fair value of all other assets is the same 
as their carrying amount.
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201558
Note 2: Financial risk management (continued)
The tables below analyse the Group’s financial liabilities into relevant maturity groupings based on the expected 
future cashflows.
Contractual maturities of financial 
liabilities At 30 June 2015
Non-derivatives
Non-interest bearing
Trade payables
Licence fees and other payables
Less than 
6 months 
$,000
6 – 12 
months 
$’000
Between 
1 and 2 
years 
$’000
Between 
2 and 5 
years 
$’000
Over 5 
years 
$’000
Total cash 
flows 
$’000
Carrying 
amount 
$’000
12,476
6,394
–
155
–
10
–
–
–
–
12,476
12,476
6,559
6,559
Future trailing commissions payable 
27,409
25,204
43,203
82,881
60,682
239,379
193,791
46,279
25,359
43,213
82,881
60,682
258,414
212,826
The fair value of the future trailing commissions payable is $204,776,000. The fair value of all other liabilities is the 
same as their carrying amount.
Contractual maturities of financial 
liabilities At 30 June 2014
Non-derivatives
Non-interest bearing
Trade payables
Licence fees and other payables
Less than 
6 months 
$,000
6 – 12 
months 
$’000
Between 
1 and 2 
years 
$’000
Between 
2 and 5 
years 
$’000
Over 5 
years 
$’000
Total cash 
flows 
$’000
Carrying 
amount 
$’000
12,085
5,817
–
155
–
11
–
–
–
–
12,085
12,085
5,983
5,983
Future trailing commissions payable 
25,894
24,543
43,602
87,979
59,746
241,764
191,534
43,796
24,698
43,613
87,979
59,746
259,832
209,602
The fair value of the future trailing commissions payable is $204,973,000. The fair value of all other liabilities is the 
same as their carrying amount.
(d)  Prepayment risk
Prepayment risk has been assessed through sensitivity analysis, refer to Note 3.
Note 3: Critical accounting estimates and judgements
Estimates and judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, 
including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
The Group makes estimates and assumptions concerning the future. The resulting accounting estimates will, by 
definition, seldom equal the related actual results. The estimates and assumptions that have a significant risk of 
causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are 
discussed below.
Trailing commissions
The Group receives trailing commissions from lenders on settled loans over the life of the loan based on the loan book 
balance outstanding. The Group also makes trailing commission payments to franchisees based on their individual 
loan book balance outstanding.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsFor the year ended 30 June 201559
The trailing commissions receivable and the corresponding payable to franchisees is determined by using the 
discounted cash flow valuation technique, which requires the use of assumptions. The key assumptions to determine 
the amortised cost at balance sheet date are the future run-off rate of the underlying loan portfolio, the discount 
rate and the percentage paid to franchisees. The future run-off rate used is actually a series of rates applied to the 
underlying loans based primarily on their age at the date of valuation. The weighted average life shown below is the 
result of the series of future run-off rates applied to the specific loan data at the balance sheet date.
The determination of the assumptions to be used in the valuation is made by Management based primarily on two 
factors: an annual assessment, with external actuaries, of the underlying loan portfolio including historical run-off rate 
analysis and consideration of current and future economic factors. These factors are complex and the determination of 
assumptions requires a high degree of judgement. 
The significant assumptions used in the valuation are listed below:
Weighted average loan life
Average discount rate
Percentage paid to franchisees
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
3.8 years
4.0 years
6.8%
61%
7.6%
61%
If the series of run-off rates used in the valuation of trailing commissions receivable and payable were to differ by +/- 
10% from Management’s estimates, the impact on the balance sheet would be:
  a decrease in net assets of $7.1 million (made up of decreases in current assets of $1.1 million, non-current 
assets of $24.9 million, current liabilities of $0.7 million, non-current liabilities of $15.1 million and deferred tax 
liabilities of $3.1 million) if run-off rates increase by 10%; or
  an increase in net assets of $8.2 million (made up of increases in current assets of $1.1 million, non-current 
assets of $28.8 million, current liabilities of $0.7 million, non-current liabilities of $17.5 million and deferred tax 
liabilities of $3.5 million) if run-off rates decrease by 10%.
Changes to the discount rate are likely to occur as a result of changes to the interest rate. However, management does 
not consider this to have a material impact on the fair value calculation of trailing commissions receivable and the 
corresponding payable to franchisees. Management does not consider material changes to the percentage paid to 
franchisees to be reasonably possible. 
In the current period, the annual review of the underlying loan book found that the run-off rate experienced in 2015 
was faster than that assumed in the valuation model and an adjustment to the profit and loss for the year was 
recognised to reflect the actual experience in the portfolio. In addition the assumptions used in the valuation of future 
trailing commissions were changed to reflect an extension of the current economic environment for the short to 
medium term. These changes to the trailing commission model resulted in a $1.6 million negative adjustment after tax 
to the Group’s profit and loss for FY 2015 (2014 – $1.1 million negative adjustment). 
Note 4: Segment information
(a)  Description of segments
Management has determined the operating segments based on the reports reviewed by the Chief Executive Officer 
that are used to make strategic and operating decisions.
The Chief Executive Officer considers the business from both a product and cash versus IFRS presentation of the results. 
Therefore management has identified four reportable product segments, Mortgage Choice franchised mortgage broking 
(MOC) , Help Me Choose health fund and mortgage comparison website (HMC), Mortgage Choice Financial Planning 
(MCFP) and LoanKit aggregation mortgage broking (LoanKit) (discontinued). The Group operates only in Australia. 
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201560
Note 4: Segement information (continued)
(b)  Information provided to the Chief Executive Officer
Information provided to the Chief Executive Officer for the year ended 30 June 2015 is as follows:
Product Segments
2015
Revenue
Gross Profit (IFRS)
Gross profit (cash)
OPEX (excl SBR*)
Depreciation and amortisation
Income tax expense
NPAT (IFRS)
NPAT (cash)
*  Share based remuneration
2014
Revenue
Gross Profit (IFRS)
Gross profit (cash)
OPEX (excl SBR*)
Depreciation and amortisation
Income tax expense
NPAT (IFRS)
NPAT (cash)
NPAT (IFRS) incl sale of LoanKit
NPAT (cash) incl sale of LoanKit
*  Share based remuneration
Total 
$’000
MOC 
$’000
HMC 
$’000
MCFP 
$’000
Loankit 
(discontinued) 
$’000
184,795
172,844
65,383
63,717
38,000
1,304
7,652
18,856
18,566
60,315
59,237
31,506
1,090
8,100
19,901
19,955
5,845
3,800
 3,212 
4,316 
 148 
(165)
(384)
(763)
6,106
1,268
1,268
2,178
66
 (283)
 (661)
 (626)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Total 
$’000
MOC 
$’000
HMC 
$’000
MCFP 
$’000
Loankit 
(discontinued) 
$’000
178,793
170,841
63,074
61,545
35,085
1,603
8,210
18,455
18,708
19,799
20,052
58,740
57,261
29,874
1,392
8,488
19,106
19,342
20,450
20,686
4,646
3,369
 3,319 
 3,039 
 129 
92
214
203
214
203
2,977
636
636
1,706
54
 (331)
 (773)
 (739)
 (773)
 (739)
329
329
329
466
28
(39)
(92)
(98)
(92)
(98)
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsFor the year ended 30 June 201561
Cash versus IFRS
2015
2014
% change
2015
2014
% change
Cash1, 3
IFRS3
$,000
$’000
$’000
$’000
11%
(6%)
1%
12%
(9%)
0%
2%
30%
27%
10%
4%
10%
Origination commission income
69,997
63,014
Trailing commission income2
89,333
87,407
Origination commission paid
Trailing commission paid2
Net core commissions
159,330
150,421
51,492
45,777
54,138
52,192
105,630
97,969
53,700
52,452
11%
2%
6%
12%
4%
8%
2%
69,997
63,014
92,490
98,535
162,487
161,549
51,492
45,777
56,217
61,841
107,709
107,618
54,778
53,931
Diversified products net revenue
1,567
1,208
30%
1,567
1,208
HMC and Financial Planning net revenue
Other income
Gross Profit
Operating Expenses
Share based remuneration
Net profit before tax
Net profit after tax
Discontinued operations3
4,337
4,113
3,815
3,741
63,717
61,216
38,000
34,619
–
–
25,717
26,597
18,566
18,806
–
1,246
14%
10%
4%
10%
(3%)
(1%)
–
4,925
3,865
4,113
3,741
65,383
62,745
38,000
34,619
875
1,330
(34%)
26,508
26,796
18,856
18,547
–
1,252
(1%)
2%
–
NPAT 
18,566
20,052
(7%)
18,856
19,799
(5%)
1   Cash is based on accruals accounting and excludes share based remuneration and the net present value of future trailing 
commissions receivable and payable.
2  Trailing commission income and trailing commission paid include discount unwind as itemised in the consolidated 
income statement.
3  2014 income and expenses have been restated to combine trading results in the discontinued operation (LoanKit) with the after tax 
gain on sale of LoanKit. Refer note 5 for further details.
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201562
Note 4: Segement information (continued)
The following provides additional detail to assist in reconciliation of the above table to the consolidated 
income statement:
2015
2014
% change
2015
2014
% change
Cash
IFRS
$,000
$’000
$’000
$’000
Diversified products commissions
6,387
5,691
Diversified products direct costs
4,820
4,483
Diversified products net income
1,567
1,208
Help Me Choose commissions*
Help Me Choose direct costs
5,224
4,537
2,045
1,277
12%
8%
30%
15%
60%
Help Me Choose net income
3,179
3,260
(2%)
6,387
5,691
4,820
4,483
1,567
5,812
2,045
3,767
1,208
4,587
1,277
3,310
Financial Planning revenue
Financial Planning direct costs
5,996
2,896
4,838
2,341
107%
107%
5,996
2,896
4,838
2,341
12%
8%
30%
27%
60%
14%
107%
107%
Financial Planning net revenue
1,158
555
109%
1,158
555
109%
HMC and Financial Planning net revenue
4,337
3,815
Franchise income
1,504
1,522
Interest
Other Income
Other income
487
2,122
4,113
538
1,681
3,741
14%
(1%)
(9%)
26%
10%
4,925
3,865
27%
1,504
1,522
487
2,122
4,113
538
1,681
3,741
(1%)
(9%)
26%
10%
*  Help Me Choose cash income is based on accruals accounting and excludes the net present value of future trailing commissions’ 
receivable on health policies written during the year. 
(c)  Other information
(i)  Operating income
Operating income from the origination of a residential mortgage is comprised of commission paid at the time the loan 
is originated and a trailing commission which is paid over the life of the loan. Prior to the introduction of IFRS in 2006, 
trailing commission was recognised as income as it became due over the life of a loan. Under IFRS, the future trailing 
cash flows to be received over the life of a loan are estimated, discounted to present value and recognised at the time 
a loan settles. The Chief Executive Officer considers both methods in measuring the Group’s performance.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsFor the year ended 30 June 2015(ii)  Net profit after tax
The cash net profit after tax (as shown above) reconciles to the IFRS profit after tax as follows:
Cash Net profit after tax
NPV future trails on new loans originated, net of payout
Less net cash from trail previously recognised under IFRS
Plus adjustments to loan book assumptions
Plus gain on prepayment of trail liability
Plus reversal of amortisation of trail liability1
NPV future trails on Help Me Choose policies written
Less net cash from trail previously recognised under IFRS
Less share based payments expense
Net IFRS after tax profit for the year
63
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
18,566
20,603
20,052
19,934
(18,368) 
(18,134) 
(1,605)
(1,146)
–
124
989
(578)
(875)
184
198
413
(378)
(1,324)
18,856
19,799
1  Under cash profit, the prepayment of trail liability is spread over the estimated life of the trail book portfolio. 
(iii)  Gross profit and net core commissions
The cash gross profit and net core commissions reconcile to their IFRS equivalents as follows:
Gross Profit
Net Core Commissions
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
Cash
63,717
61,216
53,700
52,452
NPV future trails on new loans originated, net 
of payout
Less net cash from trail previously recognised 
under IFRS
29,435
28,476
29,435
28,476
(26,241)
(25,906) 
(26,241)
(25,906) 
Plus adjustments to loan book assumptions
(2,293) 
(1,638)
(2,293)
(1,638)
Plus gain on prepayment of trail liability
Plus reversal of amortisation of trail liability*
NPV future trails on Help Me Choose policies written
Less net cash from trail previously recognised 
under IFRS
– 
177
1,413
264
283
590
(825)
(540)
–
177
–
–
264
283
–
–
IFRS
65,383
62,745
54,778
53,931
*  Under cash profit, the prepayment of trail liability is spread over the estimated life of the trail book portfolio.
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201564
Note 5: Discontinued 
operation
(i)   Description
On 30 September 2013 Mortgage Choice sold 100% of the 
issued shares in Beagle Finance Pty Limited, owner of 
the LoanKit mortgage brokerage aggregation business, 
for cash consideration of $1,850,000. The LoanKit 
division is reported in these financial statements as a 
discontinued operation.
Financial information relating to the discontinued 
operation for the year is set out below.
(iii)  Details of the sale of the division
Consideration received
Cash
Total disposable consideration
Selling costs
Carrying amount of net assets sold
(ii)   Financial performance and cash flow information
Income tax expense
2014 
$’000
1,850
1,850
(155)
(30)
1,665
(321)
1,344
The financial performance and cash flow information 
presented are for the year ended 30 June 2014. This 
includes costs incurred by Mortgage Choice between 
1 October 2013 and 30 June 2014.
The carrying amounts of the assets and liabilities as at 
the date of sale (30 September 2013) were:
2014 
$’000
30 Sept 2013 
$’000
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Intangible assets
Total assets
Liabilities
Trade and other payables
Total Liabilities
Net assets
13
6
29
48
18
18
30
Revenue
Interest
Other income
Expenses
Loss before income tax
Income tax expense
Loss after tax of discontinued operation
Gain on sale of division before 
income tax
Income tax expense
Gain on sale of division after 
income tax
Profit/(loss) from 
discontinued operation
Net cash inflow/(outflow) from 
operating activities
Net cash inflow from investing 
activities
Net increase/(decrease) in cash for 
discontinued operation
310
–
19
329
460
(131)
39
(92)
1,665
(321)
1,344
1,252
2014 
$’000
(60)
1,850
1,790
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsFor the year ended 30 June 2015Note 6: Revenue
Revenue from continuing operations
Sales revenue
Services
Other revenue
Interest earned on deposits and loans
Interest in relation to discount unwind
Other income
Note 7: Other income
Conference sponsorships (note (a))
Other
(a)  Conference sponsorships
65
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
159,911
152,549
487
538
22,275
23,696
2,122
1,681
184,795
178,464
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
2,079
43
2,122
1,610
71
1,681
Lenders sponsor Mortgage Choice’s National Conference, High Flyers’ Conference, quarterly state conferences, and 
periodic training days and workshops. 
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201566
Note 8: Expenses
Profit from ordinary activities before income tax includes the following 
specific expenses:
Finance costs
Interest and finance charges (note (a))
Net loss on disposal of property, plant and equipment
Depreciation
Plant and equipment
Amortisation
Leasehold improvements
Computer software
Impairment loss (note (b))
Other provisions
Employee entitlements
Rental expense relating to operating leases
Defined contribution superannuation expense
Termination benefits
(a)  Interest and finance charges
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
13,444
14,129
4
–
266
354
23
1,015
1,187
266
1,133
1,612
23
60
1,189
–
195
1,125
1,259
31
Interest expense comprises the unwinding of the discount in relation to payment of trailing commission to franchisees.
(b)  Impairment loss
An impairment loss of $1.2m has been included in technology operating expenses.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsFor the year ended 30 June 2015Note 9: Income tax
(a)  Income tax expense
Current tax
Deferred tax
Under (over) provided in prior years
Income tax expense is attributable to:
Profit from continuing operations
Profit from discontinued operations
Deferred income tax (revenue) expense including income tax expense comprises:
(Increase)/decrease in deferred tax assets (note 13)
Increase/(decrease) in deferred tax liabilities (note 18)
(b)  Numerical reconciliation of income tax expense to prima facie tax payable
67
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
6,781
871
–
7,652
7,652
–
7,652
8,011
520
–
8,531
8,249
282
8,531
(1,250)
(3,016)
2,121
871
3,536
520
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
Profit from continuing operations before income tax expense
26,508
26,796
Income tax calculated @ 30% (2014 – 30%)
Discontinued operations tax expense
Tax effect of amounts which are not deductible/(assessable) in calculating 
taxable income:
Research and Development Tax Incentive
Under/(over) provision from prior years
Income tax expense
No part of the deferred tax asset shown above and in note 13 is attributable to tax losses. 
7,952
–
202
(502)
7,652
–
7,652
8,039
282
305
(95)
8,531
–
8,531
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201568
Note 10: Current Assets – Cash and cash equivalents
Cash at bank and on hand
Risk exposure
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
7,827
12,445
The Group’s exposure to interest rate risk is discussed in note 2. The maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting 
date is the carrying amount of each class of cash and cash equivalents mentioned above.
Note 11: Trade and other receivables 
2015
Non-
current 
$’000
Current 
$,000
Total 
$’000
Current 
$’000
2014
Non-
current 
$’000
Total 
$’000
Trade receivables(1)
12,132
–
12,132
14,112
–
14,112
Net present value of future trailing 
commissions receivable
Franchisee receivables
Other receivables
Prepayments
84,774
236,080
320,854
80,975
236,136
317,111
975
998
1,520
2,100
3,075
29
–
1,027
1,520
939
877
1,973
2,108
3,047
–
–
877
1,973
100,399
238,209
338,608
98,876
238,244
337,120
(1) Subject to a limited charge in favour of The Loan Book Security Trust (refer to note 15)
(a)  Other receivables
These amounts generally arise from transactions outside the usual operating activities of the consolidated entity.
(b)  Impaired trade receivables
As at 30 June 2015 current trade receivables were not impaired (2014 – nil). 
(c)  Risk exposure
Information about the Group’s exposure to credit risk and interest rate risk is provided in note 2.
(d)  Fair values
The carrying amounts of trade and other receivables at year end is a reasonable approximation of their fair values 
with the exception of the net present value of future trailing commissions receivable which are accounted for at 
amortised cost.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsFor the year ended 30 June 201569
Note 12: Non-Current Assets – Property, plant and equipment
Plant and 
Equipment 
$’000
Leasehold 
Improvements 
$’000
Total 
$’000
At 30 June 2013
Cost
Accumulated depreciation
Net book amount
Year ended 30 June 2014
Opening net book amount
Additions
Disposals
Depreciation charge
Closing net book amount
At 30 June 2014
Cost
Accumulated depreciation
Net book amount
Year ended 30 June 2015
Opening net book amount
Additions
Disposals
Depreciation charge
Closing net book amount
At 30 June 2015
Cost
Accumulated depreciation
Net book amount
2,394
(1,744)
650
650
399
–
(354)
695
2,416
(1,721)
695
695
207
(4)
(266)
632
2,581
(1,949)
632
1,096
(1,054)
42
42
230
–
(60)
212
1,320
(1,108)
212
212
5
–
(23)
194
1,318
(1,124)
194
3,490
(2,798)
692
692
629
–
(414)
907
3,736
(2,829)
907
907
212
(4)
(289)
826
3,899
(3,073)
826
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201570
Note 13: Non-current assets – Deferred tax assets
The balance comprises temporary differences attributable to:
Net present value of future trailing commissions payable
58,137
57,459
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
Employee benefits
Depreciation and amortisation
Accrued expenses
Total deferred tax assets
991
331
770
945
317
258
60,229
58,979
Set off of deferred tax assets pursuant to set off provisions (note 18)
(60,229)
(58,979)
Net deferred tax assets
Deferred tax assets to be recovered within 12 months
Deferred tax assets to be recovered after more than 12 months
–
16,948
43,281
60,229
–
15,677
43,302
58,979
Movements
NPV of future 
trailing 
commissions 
payable 
$,000
Employee 
benefits 
$’000
Depreciation 
and 
amortisation 
$’000
Accrued 
expenses 
$’000
Other 
$’000
Total 
$’000
At 30 June 2013
54,638
Charged/(credited) to the 
income statement
At 30 June 2014
Charged/(credited) to 
the income statement
At 30 June 2015
2,821
57,459
678
58,137
875
70
945
46
991
264
53
317
14
331
186
72
258
512
770
–
–
–
–
–
55,963
3,016
58,979
1,250
60,229
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsFor the year ended 30 June 2015Note 14: Non-current assets – intangible assets
At 30 June 2013
Cost 
Accumulated amortisation
Net book amount
Year ended 30 June 2014
Opening net book amount
Additions
Amortisation charge
Closing net book amount
At 30 June 2014
Cost 
Accumulated amortisation
Net book amount
Year ended 30 June 2015
Opening net book amount
Additions
Amortisation charge
Impairment loss (a) 
Closing net book amount
At 30 June 2015
Cost
Accumulated depreciation
Net book amount
(a)  Impairment loss
71
Computer 
Software 
$’000
8,946
(6,659)
2,287
 2,287
 1,251
 (1,189)
 2,349
 9,200
 (6,851)
 2,349
 2,349
 7,001
 (1,015)
 (1,187)
 7,148
 15,014
 (7,866)
 7,148
Project One replaces the Group’s core broker platform for the use of the Mortgage Choice franchised mortgage broking 
segment. After the delivery of the first phase of Project One, the Group carried out a review of the recoverable amount 
of the intangible asset. The review led to the recognition of an impairment loss of $1.2 million, which has been 
recognised in the technology operating expense line item in the profit or loss (see Note 8).
The Group estimated the fair value less costs of disposal of the Mortgage Choice franchised mortgage broking segment 
using the recent share market prices for the Group. This was apportioned to the contribution of the segment less 
estimated costs of disposal which amounted to $266 million as at 30 June 2015. The estimated fair value less costs of 
disposal is greater than the estimated value in use and carrying amount of the segment.
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201572
Note 15: Current liabilities – Trade and other payables
Trade payables(1)
Net present value of future trailing commissions payable
Licence fees repayable
Other payables
(1) Loan Book Security Trust
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
12,476
50,906
257
6,292
69,931
12,085
48,645
236
5,736
66,702
The Loan Book Security Scheme provides security for the trailing commissions payable to certain eligible franchisees 
based on performance criteria. Mortgage Choice Limited has granted two charges in favour of a trustee on behalf of the 
eligible franchisees. The independent trustee is AET Structured Finance Services Pty Limited. 
The first charge is over a specified percentage of the Company’s trailing commission income. The purpose of this charge 
is to be the first source of funds available to eligible franchisees for the payment of trailing commissions in the event 
that administration or liquidation occurs. The charge will crystallise and can be enforced by eligible franchisees only in 
the event of liquidation or administration of Mortgage Choice Limited. 
As at 30 June 2015, the amount that would be subject to charge resulting from applying the specified percentage to the 
trailing commission immediately due to be received by Mortgage Choice Limited is $4,410,359 (2014 – $4,137,371). This 
is included as part of the balance of trade payables at 30 June 2015 and would be subject to charge until disbursed to 
the eligible franchisees. The amount subject to the charge would vary dependant on trailing commission due to be 
received by Mortgage Choice Limited from month to month. 
The second charge is a floating charge over all of the assets of Mortgage Choice Limited. It is limited in the powers it 
allows the security trustee to exercise prior to liquidation. Its primary purpose is to ensure that the loan book security 
structure need not be subject to the moratorium arising if an administrator were to be appointed to Mortgage Choice 
Limited. Only after liquidation does this charge confer comprehensive mortgagee powers on the security trustee.
Fair values
The carrying amounts of trade and other payables at year end is a reasonable approximation of their fair values 
with the exception of the net present value of future trailing commissions payable which are accounted for at 
amortised cost. 
Note 16: Current liabilities – Provisions
Make good provision (a)
Employee entitlements – annual leave
Employee entitlements – long service leave
2015
Non-
current 
$’000
488
–
283
771
Current 
$,000
40
963
302
1,305
Total 
$’000
Current 
$’000
528
963
585
85
795
223
2,076
1,103
2014
Non-
current 
$’000
498
–
264
762
Total 
$’000
583
795
487
1,865
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsFor the year ended 30 June 201573
(a)  Make good provision
Mortgage Choice is required to restore the leased premises of its offices to their original condition at the end of the 
respective lease terms. A provision has been recognised for the present value of the estimated expenditure required to 
remove any leasehold improvements. These costs have been capitalised as part of the cost of leasehold improvements 
and are amortised over the shorter of the term of the lease or the useful life of the assets. Make good costs that are not 
expected to be settled within twelve months have been included in non-current liabilities.
Note 17: Non-current liabilities – Trade and other payables
Net present value of future trailing commissions payable 
Licence fees repayable
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
142,885
142,889
10
11
142,895
142,900
Note 18: Non-current liabilities – Deferred tax liabilities
The balance comprises temporary differences attributable to:
NPV of future trailing commissions receivable
Intangibles
Prepayments and other receivables
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
96,257
95,133
1,403
45
404
47
97,705
95,584
Set off of deferred tax assets pursuant to set off provisions (note 13)
(60,229)
(58,979)
Net deferred tax assets
Deferred tax assets to be recovered within 12 months
Deferred tax assets to be recovered after more than 12 months
Movements – Consolidated
37,476
25,747
71,958
97,705
36,605
24,699
70,885
95,584
NPV of future 
trailing 
commissions 
payable 
$’000
Intangibles 
$’000
Prepayments 
and other 
receivables 
$’000
Total 
$’000
At 30 June 2013
Charged to the income statement
At 30 June 2014
Charged to the income statement
91,780
3,353
95,133
1,124
230
174
404
999
At 30 June 2015
96,257
1,403
38
9
47
(2)
45
92,048
3,536
95,584
2,121
97,705
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201574
Note 19: Contributed equity
2015 
shares 
$’000
2014 
shares 
$’000
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
(a)  Share capital
Ordinary shares – fully paid
123,033
122,170
5,780
4,604
Ordinary shares entitle the holder to participate in dividends and the proceeds on winding up of the company in 
proportion to the number of and amounts paid on the shares held.
On a show of hands every holder of ordinary shares present at a meeting in person or by proxy, is entitled to one vote, 
and upon a poll each share is entitled to one vote.
Ordinary shares have no par value and the company does not have a limited amount of authorised capital.
Total contributed equity as at 30 June 2015:
Details
Total ordinary shares on issue
Treasury shares (note (i)
Total ordinary shares held as contributed equity
(i)  Treasury shares
Number of 
shares 
$’000
124,216,248
(1,183,391)
123,032,857
Treasury shares are shares in Mortgage Choice Limited that are held by the Mortgage Choice Performance Share 
Plan Trust for the purpose of issuing shares under the Mortgage Choice Performance Share Plan (PSP) (see note 31 for 
further information).
Date
Details
30 June 2013
Balance
Number of 
shares
1,722,498
31 August 2013
Treasury shares issues under the Performance Share Plan to employees
(169,333)
3 September 2013
Treasury shares issues under the Performance Share Plan to employees
(189,699)
13 September 2013
Treasury shares issues under the Performance Share Plan to employees
(102,080)
31 October 2013
Shares issued to the Mortgage Choice Performance Share Plan Trust
30 June 2014
Balance
31 December 2013
Treasury shares issues under the Performance Share Plan to employees
23 August 2014
Shares issued to the Mortgage Choice Employee Incentive Trust
23 August 2014
Treasury shares issues under the Share Rights Plan to employees
3 September 2014
Treasury shares issues under the Performance Share Plan to employees
12 September 2014
Treasury shares issues under the Performance Share Plan to employees
5 November 2014
Shares issued to the Mortgage Choice Employee Incentive Trust
30 June 2015
Balance
349,105
1,610,491
(16,346)
98,909
(98,909)
(180,452)
(567,254)
336,952
1,183,391
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsFor the year ended 30 June 201575
Movements in ordinary share capital:
Date
Details
30 June 2013
Balance
31 August 2013
Treasury shares issues under the Performance Share Plan 
to employees
3 September 2013
Treasury shares issues under the Performance Share Plan 
to employees
13 September 2013
Treasury shares issues under the Performance Share Plan 
to employees
31 October 2013
Shares issued to the Mortgage Choice Performance Share 
Plan Trust
31 October 2013
Held as treasury shares
Number of 
shares 
$’000
$’000
121,708,784
4,018
169,333
189,699
102,080
349,105
(349,105)
210
223
153
–
–
30 June 2014
Balance
122,169,896
4,604
31 December 2013
Treasury shares issues under the Performance Share Plan 
to employees
23 August 2014
Treasury shares issues under the Share Rights Plan 
to employees
3 September 2014
Treasury shares issues under the Performance Share Plan 
to employees
16,346
98,909
180,452
22
234
225
12 September 2014
Treasury shares issues under the Performance Share Plan 
to employees
567,254
695
5 November 2014
Shares issued to the Mortgage Choice Employee 
Incentive Trust
5 November 2014
Held as treasury shares
30 June 2015
Balance
(b)  Employee share scheme
336,952
(336,952)
–
–
123,032,857
5,780
Information relating to the employee share scheme, including details of shares issued under the scheme, is set out in 
note 31.
(c)  Options
Information relating to the Mortgage Choice Executive Performance Option Plan, including details of options issued, 
exercised and lapsed during the financial year and options outstanding at the end of the financial year is set out in 
note 31.
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201576
Note 20: Reserves and retained profits
(a)  Reserves
Share-based payments reserve
Movements:
Share-based payments reserve
Balance 1 July
Performance shares expensed/(reversed)
Vesting of shares held by the Mortgage Choice Performance Share Plan Trust 
to employees
Balance 30 June
(b)  Retained profits
Balance 1 July
Adjustment for provision for clawbacks
Net profit for the year
Dividends 
Balance 30 June
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
1,909
2,210
2,210
875
(1,176)
1,909
1,472
1,324
(586)
2,210
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
95,517
93,642
(923)
–
18,856
19,799
(19,227)
(17,924)
94,223
95,517
(c)  Adjustment for provision for clawbacks
There is a potential for origination commissions to be clawed back by lenders after loans have settled. This is now 
estimated and recognised at the time of settlement and a provision has been created for potential commission 
clawbacks as at 1 July 2014. The recognition of this provision has resulted in a reduction of opening retained earnings 
for the 30 June 2015 full year of $923,000 from $95,517,000 to $94,594,000.
In the event a lender claws commission back, a corresponding clawback will be deducted from franchisees. The 
adjustment to retained earnings is net of franchisee clawbacks.
Had this accounting treatment been in place for FY2014, the net profit after tax for that period would have reduced 
by $20,000.
(d)  Nature and purpose of reserves
(i)  Share-based payments reserve
The share-based payments reserve is used to recognise the fair value of options and performance shares granted but 
not vested.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsFor the year ended 30 June 2015Note 21: Dividends
(a)  Ordinary shares
Final dividend declared out of profits of the Company for the year ended  
30 June 2013 of 7.0 cents per fully paid share paid on 16 September 2013:
Fully franked based on tax paid @ 30%
7.0 cents per share
Interim dividend declared out of profits of the Company for the half-year ended 
31 December 2013 of 7.5 cents per fully paid share paid 24 March 2014:
Fully franked based on tax paid @ 30% 
7.5 cents per share
Final dividend declared out of profits of the Company for the year ended  
30 June 2014 of 8.0 cents per fully paid share paid on 15 September 2014:
Fully franked based on tax paid @ 30%
8.0 cents per share
Interim dividend declared out of profits of the Company for the half-year ended 
31 December 2014 of 7.5 cents per fully paid share paid 19 March 2015:
Fully franked based on tax paid @ 30% 
7.5 cents per share
77
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
–
–
9,911
9,316
19,227
8,640
9,284
–
–
17,924
(b)  Dividends not recognised at year end
In addition to the above dividends, since year end the Directors have 
recommended the payment of a final dividend of 8.0 cents per fully paid ordinary 
share, (2014 – 8.0 cents) fully franked based on tax paid at 30%. The aggregate 
amount of the proposed dividend expected to be paid on 10 September 2015 out of 
retained profits at 30 June 2015, but not recognised as a liability at year end, is
9,945
9,910
(c)  Franked dividend
The franked portions of the final dividends recommended after 30 June 2015 will be franked out of existing franking 
credits or out of franking credits arising from the payment of income tax in the year ending 30 June 2016.
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
Franking credits available for subsequent financial years to the equity holders of 
the parent entity based on a tax rate of 30% (2014 – 30%)
2,748
4,602
The above amounts represent the balance of the franking account as at the end of the financial year, adjusted for:
(a)  franking credits that will arise from the payment of the amount of the provision for income tax;
(b)  franking debits that will arise from the payment of dividends recognised as a liability at the reporting date; and
(c)  franking credits that will arise from the receipt of dividends recognised as receivables at the reporting date.
The impact on the franking account of the dividend recommended by the Directors since year end, but not recognised 
as a liability at year end, will be a reduction in the franking account of $4,262,000 (2014: $4,247,000).
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201578
Note 22: Key management personnel disclosures
(e)  Key management personnel compensation
Short term employee benefits
Post employment benefits
Long–term benefits
Share based payments
Balance 30 June
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
2,486,072
2,431,947
98,611
(5,162)
97,761
19,130
541,444
1,000,339
3,120,965
3,549,177
Detailed remuneration disclosures are provided in the Directors’ report on pages 28 – 30 of the remuneration report. 
Note 23: Remuneration of auditors
During the year the following fees were paid or payable for services provided by the auditor of the parent entity, its 
related practices and non related audit firms:
2015
(a)  Audit services
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Australian firm:
Audit and review of financial reports
Total remuneration for audit services
(b)  Non-audit services
Non audit-related services
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Australan firm:
Actuarial services
Risk advice
Taxation services
Total remuneration for non-audit services
$
184,275
184,275
75,000
131,000
24,930
230,930
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsFor the year ended 30 June 201579
$
192,500
192,500
75,000
1,644
76,644
2014
(a)  Audit services
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Australian firm:
Audit and review of financial reports
Total remuneration for audit services
(b)  Non-audit services
Non audit-related services
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Australan firm:
Actuarial services
Taxation services
Total remuneration for non-audit services
Note 24: Contingencies 
Contingent liabilities
The Group had contingent liabilities at 30 June 2015 in respect of:
Guarantees
Guarantees given in respect of premises leases $755,414 (2013: $760,459).
Contingent claims
From time to time disputes occur between the Company and its franchisees in the normal course of operation, a 
number of which may be unresolved at any point in time. At 30 June 2015 and 30 June 2014, there were no disputes or 
claims in progress that are expected to have a material financial impact on the Company.
No material losses are anticipated in respect of any of the above contingent liabilities.
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201580
Note 25: Commitments 
Lease commitments
Non-cancellable operating leases
The Group leases various offices under non cancellable operating leases expiring within one to six years. The leases 
have varying terms, escalation clauses and renewal rights. On renewal, the terms of the leases are renegotiated. The 
Group also leases various pieces of office equipment under non-cancellable operating leases.
Operating leases
Operating lease expenditure contracted for at the reporting date but not recognised 
as liabilities payable:
Within one year
Later than one year but not later than five years
Later than five years
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
1,123
2,728
–
3,851
1,070
3,352
–
4,422
Note 26: Related party transactions
(f)  Parent entity
The ultimate parent entity within the Group is Mortgage Choice Limited.
(g)  Subsidiaries
Interests in subsidiaries are set out in note 27.
(h)  Key management personnel
Disclosures relating to key management personnel are set out in note 22. Additional disclosures are set out in the 
Directors’ report in the remuneration report. 
(i)  Loans to/from related parties
The Group has formed trusts to administer the Group’s employee share scheme. These are funded by the parent entity. 
This trusts are consolidated, as the substance of the relationship is that the trust is controlled by the Group.
No provisions for doubtful debts have been raised in relation to any outstanding balances, and no expense has been 
recognised in respect of bad or doubtful debts due from related parties.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsFor the year ended 30 June 201581
Note 27: Subsidiaries
Significant investments in subsidiaries
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the assets, liabilities and results of the following principal 
subsidiaries in accordance with the accounting policy described in note 1(B):
Name of entity
Country of  
incorporation
Class of Shares
MC Loan Book Security Pty Limited
Australia
Help Me Choose Pty Limited
Australia
Ordinary
Ordinary
Mortgage Choice Financial Planning 
Pty Limited
Australia
Ordinary
Equity holding*
2015 
%
100
100
100
2014 
%
100
100
100
These subsidiaries, except Mortgage Choice Financial Planning Pty Limited, have been granted relief from the 
necessity to prepare financial reports in accordance with Class Order 98/1418 issued by the Australian Securities and 
Investments Commission.
*  The proportion of ownership interest is equal to the proportion of voting power held.
Note 28: Events occurring after the balance sheet date
Dividend payment
Subsequent to year end, a final ordinary dividend of $9,945,000 (8.0 cents per fully paid share) was declared out of 
profits of the Company for the year ended 30 June 2015 on 18 August 2015 to be paid on 10 September 2015.
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201582
Note 29: Reconciliation of profit after income tax to net cash 
inflow from operating activities
Profit for the year
Depreciation and amortisation
Change in net present value of future trailing inflows
Change in net present value of future trailing outflows
Employee expense benefits – share-based payments
Interest received
Impairment of non-current assets
Net loss (gain) on sales of non-current assest
Net loss/(gain) on sale of LoanKit
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
18,856
1,304
(3,744)
2,256
875
(487)
1,187
4
–
19,799
1,603
(11,177)
9,932
1,324
(538)
–
–
(1,666)
(Increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables
(836)
(3,014)
(Increase)/decrease in other operating assets
Increase/(decrease) in trade payables
Increase/(decrease) in other operating liabilities
Increase/(decrease) in provision for income taxes payable
Increase/(decrease) in deferred tax liabilities
Increase/(decrease) in other provisions 
Net cash inflow from operating activities
Note 30: Earnings per share
(a)  Basic earnings per share
From continuing operations
From discontinued operation 
Total basic earnings per share
(b)  Diluted earnings per share
From continuing operations
From discontinued operation 
Total diluted earnings per share
453
1,711
577
(2,299)
1,267
211
(51)
847
766
401
520
346
21,335
19,092
Consolidated
2015 
Cents
2014 
Cents
15.2
–
15.2
15.2
–
15.2
15.0
1.0
16.0
15.0
1.0
16.0
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsFor the year ended 30 June 2015Earnings used in calculating earnings per share
Profit from continuing operations
Profit from discontinued operations
Profit for the year attributable to owners of the Company
83
Consolidated
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
18,856
–
18,856
18,547
1,252
19,799
Consolidated
2015 
Number
2014 
Number
Weighted average number of shares used as the denominator
Weighted average number of ordinary shares used as the denominator in 
calculating basic earnings per share 
124,084,916
123,663,700
Adjustments for calculation of diluted earnings per share:
Options
Share rights
–
–
14,091
82,576
Weighted average number of ordinary shares and potential ordinary shares used 
as the denominator in calculating diluted earnings per share 
124,099,007
123,746,276
Information concerning the classification of securities
(a)  Options
Options granted to employees under the Mortgage Choice Executive Performance Option Plan are considered to be 
potential ordinary shares and have been included in the determination of diluted earnings per share. The options have 
not been included in the determination of basic earnings per share. Details relating to the options are set out in the 
Remuneration report.
(b)  Performance Share Plan
Shares issued to employees under the Mortgage Choice Performance Share Plan are considered to be ordinary shares 
and have been included in the determination of basic earnings per share. Details relating to the shares are set out in 
the Remuneration report.
(c)  Share Rights Plan
Share rights granted to the CEO under the Mortgage Choice Share Rights Plan that have vested are considered to be 
potential ordinary shares and are included in the determination of diluted earnings per share once the hurdles have 
been met. The share rights have not been included in the determination of basic earnings per share. Details relating to 
the share rights are set out in the Remuneration report.
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201584
Note 31: Share-based 
payments
(a)  Executive Performance Option Plan (EPOP)
The Executive Performance Option Plan may be offered 
on an annual basis to eligible executives as determined 
by the Board. The details of each offer may differ as to 
the particulars, especially with regard to performance 
criteria, performance period and service criteria. At the 
present time this is a legacy plan as options have not 
been issued under the plan since May 2009. In the year 
ending 30 June 2015, no options were offered.
Under the terms of the EPOP, options are offered over 
one ordinary share of Mortgage Choice Limited and 
have an exercise price based on the market value of the 
Company’s shares at the time of offer. Market value will 
be the trade-weighted average price of the Company’s 
shares over the one-week period immediately preceding 
the date of offer. The rules of the EPOP permit the 
Company to issue new shares or to purchase shares 
on-market for the purposes of satisfying the exercise 
of options. 
Any options which do not become exercisable following 
the application of the performance condition and vesting 
scale will lapse. An option that has become exercisable 
but is not exercised will lapse on the earlier of: 
  ten years after the date of offer;
  three months, or such other period determined by 
the Board, after the participant ceases employment 
for a reason other than a ‘qualifying reason’ (i.e. 
death, total and permanent disability, redundancy, 
or any other reason determined by the Board); and 
  twelve months, or such other period determined by 
the Board, after the participant ceases employment 
for a ‘qualifying reason’. 
When a participant ceases to be employed by the 
Company prior to the end of the performance period, 
other than because of a ‘qualifying reason’, any options 
that have not become exercisable will lapse. However, 
if there is cessation of employment due to a ‘qualifying 
reason’, the Board may determine that some or all of the 
options may vest. In the event of a change of control of 
the Company, options will vest on a pro-rata basis or in 
their entirety for certain senior executives.
If the Board determines that a participant has acted 
fraudulently or dishonestly, has committed an act of 
harassment or discrimination, is in serious breach of any 
duty to Mortgage Choice, or, in the Board’s reasonable 
opinion, has brought Mortgage Choice into serious 
disrepute, any options held by the participant will lapse.
The assessed fair value at grant date of options granted 
to individuals is allocated equally over the period from 
grant date to vesting date. The fair value of market based 
conditions at grant date are independently determined 
using a Monte Carlo simulation model utilising a 
lattice-based trinomial valuation method that takes into 
account the exercise price, the term of the option, the 
vesting and performance criteria, the impact of dilution, 
the non tradeable nature of the option, the share price 
at grant date and the expected price volatility of the 
underlying share, the expected dividend yield and the 
risk free interest rate for the term of the option.
No options existed during the reporting period.
(b)  Performance Share Plan (PSP)
The PSP permits eligible employees as identified by the 
Board to be granted allocated unvested shares from the 
outset of the applicable performance period, with the 
shares to be held on trust for the participants by a share 
plan trustee. The shares granted to those employees 
are subject to the achievement of performance and 
service requirements as specified by the Board. The PSP 
is designed to provide the medium-term to long-term 
incentive component of remuneration for executives and 
other designated employees. 
Participation in the PSP is offered on an annual basis. 
Eligible employees are granted shares to a value 
determined by reference to the Company’s reward policy 
and market practice with regard to share based incentive 
arrangements provided by peer organisations. The right 
to receive vested shares will lapse if the performance 
and service criteria are not met. 
Shares will be acquired for participants following their 
acceptance of an offer made under the Plan. The shares 
will be acquired by the plan trustee and held on trust 
for participants until they are withdrawn from the Plan 
(after they have vested or are deemed to be vested) or 
are forfeited, in circumstances outlined below. Shares 
will be acquired only at times permitted under the 
Company’s share trading policy. Shares may be acquired 
by on-market or off-market purchases, by subscribing 
for new shares to be issued by the Company, or through 
the reallocation of forfeited shares. The method of 
acquisition for each share allocation will be determined 
by the Board. The costs of all share acquisitions under 
the Plan will be funded by the Group. Participants will 
not be required to make any payment for the acquisition 
of shares under the Plan. 
A Notice of Withdrawal may be lodged by a participant 
following the earlier of:
  a date ten years from grant date; 
  the participant ceasing to be an employee of 
the Company; 
  a ‘capital event’ (generally, a successful takeover 
offer or scheme of arrangement relating to the 
Company) occurring; or
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsFor the year ended 30 June 201585
  the date upon which the Board gives its written 
consent to the lodgement of a Notice of Withdrawal 
by the participant. 
While shares remain subject to the PSP rules, 
participants will, in general, enjoy the rights attached 
to those shares (such as voting or dividend rights etc). 
If a participant resigns from his or her employment 
with the Company, or otherwise ceases employment 
in circumstances not involving “special circumstances”, 
the participant will be required to forfeit any unvested 
shares held under the Plan on the participant’s behalf, 
unless the Board otherwise determines. Vested shares 
will be eligible for withdrawal in accordance with the 
usual procedure.
If a participant ceases to be employed by the Company 
or retires from office as a result of special circumstances 
(including death, disability, retirement, redundancy, 
corporate restructure, or any other circumstances 
determined by the Board), the Board may in its discretion 
determine that all or a portion of the participant’s 
unvested shares are to be treated as vested shares, 
notwithstanding the fact that the vesting conditions 
applicable to the shares have not been met because the 
applicable performance period has not expired.
If the Board determines that a participant has acted 
fraudulently or dishonestly, has committed an act of 
harassment or discrimination, is in serious breach of any 
duty to Mortgage Choice, or, in the Board’s reasonable 
opinion, has brought Mortgage Choice into serious 
disrepute, any shares to which the participant may have 
become entitled at the end of the performance period, 
and any shares held by the participant under the PSP are 
forfeited by the participant.
The assessed fair value at grant date of performance 
shares granted to individuals is allocated equally over 
the period from grant date to vesting date, and the 
amount is included in the remuneration tables above. 
The fair value of market based conditions at grant date 
are independently determined using a Monte Carlo 
simulation model utilising a lattice-based trinomial 
valuation method that takes into account the term 
of the performance shares, the vesting criteria, the 
exercise price (zero), the expected price volatility 
of the underlying share, the expected dividend 
yield (acknowledging that dividends will be paid to 
participants from the date of grant) and the risk free 
interest rate for the term of the performance shares. 
Details of performance shares in the Company 
provided as remuneration to each Director and other 
key management personnel are set out below. Further 
information on the performance shares and the detailed 
vesting criteria are set out in the remuneration report. 
(c)  Share Rights Plan
The Share Rights Plan (SRP) permits eligible employees 
as identified by the Board from time to time to be 
granted share rights (“rights’) from the outset of the 
applicable performance period. The rights granted to 
those employees are subject to the achievement of 
performance and service requirements as specified by 
the Board. Eligible employees are granted rights to a 
value determined by reference to the Company’s reward 
policy and market practice with regard to share based 
incentive arrangements provided by peer organisations. 
The rights lapse if the performance and service criteria 
are not met. 
Upon vesting, the Company must acquire or issue the 
number of shares, or the fraction thereof, into which 
the rights are convertible under the terms of the 
specific grant. The method of acquisition for each share 
allocation will be determined by the Board. The costs of 
all share acquisitions under the SRP will be funded by 
the Group. Participants will not be required to make any 
payment for the acquisition of rights under the SRP. The 
Board at its discretion may choose to settle the rights as 
a cash payment at its sole discretion. 
If a participant ceases to be employed by the Company 
unvested rights lapse immediately. Notwithstanding 
this rule if a participant ceases to be an employee for a 
qualifying reason (including death, disability, retirement, 
redundancy, corporate restructure, or any other 
circumstances determined by the Board), the Board 
may in its discretion determine the treatment of any 
unvested rights. 
If the Board determines that a participant has acted 
fraudulently or dishonestly; is in breach of his or her 
obligations to the Group; or is knowingly involved in 
a material misstatement of financial statements, the 
Board may determine that the conditions attached to 
the rights may be reset; the rights that have not vested 
may lapse; allocated or vested shares may be forfeited; 
or shares that have been sold on vesting must be repaid 
in part or in full.
The Board may in its sole discretion determine whether 
some or all of the rights vest or lapse or whether 
unvested rights remain subject to applicable conditions 
of vesting on the event of a change of control.
The assessed fair value at grant date of the rights granted 
to individuals is allocated equally over the period from 
grant date to vesting date, and the amount is included in 
the remuneration tables above. 
The fair value of market based conditions at grant date 
are independently determined using a Monte Carlo 
simulation model utilising a lattice-based trinomial 
valuation method that takes into account the term 
of the performance shares, the vesting criteria, the 
exercise price (zero), the expected price volatility of the 
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201586
Note 31: Share-based payments (continued)
underlying share, the expected dividend yield (acknowledging that dividends will be paid to participants from the date 
of grant) and the risk free interest rate for the term of the rights. 
Details of rights issued by the Company provided as remuneration are set out below. Further information on the rights 
and the detailed vesting criteria are set out in the remuneration report. 
Set out below are summaries of performance shares conditionally issued under the Plan:
Offer Date
Vesting date
Value
2015
Balance 
at start of 
the year 
Number
Granted 
during the 
year 
Number
Vested 
during the 
year 
Number
Expired 
during the 
year 
Number
Forfeited 
during the 
year 
Number
Balance at 
end of the 
year 
Number
20 September 2010 3 September 2014
$1.19
180,452
16 February 2012
12 September 2014
$1.26
267,234
16 February 2012
12 September 2014
$0.78
218,638
14 September 2012 12 September 2014
$1.74
48,690
14 September 2012 3 July 2015**
$1.74
15,846
14 September 2012 14 September 2015
$1.74
251,904
14 September 2012 14 September 2015
$1.08
219,060
23 September 2013 12 September 2014
$2.77
32,692
23 September 2013 3 July 2015**
$2.77
9,713
23 September 2013 14 September 2015
$2.77
22,979
23 September 2013 14 September 2016
$2.77
179,811
23 September 2013 14 September 2016
$1.68
147,125
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
22 September 2014 3 July 2015**
22 September 2014 14 September 2015
$2.72
$2.72
22 September 2014 14 September 2016
$2.72
22 September 2014 14 September 2017
22 September 2014 14 September 2017
$2.72
$1.68
–
–
–
–
–
8,109
19,973
28,082
154,436
126,352
(180,452)
(267,234)
(218,638)
(48,690)
–
–
–
(32,692)
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
Total
1,594,144
336,952
(747,706)
Weighted average price
$1.53
$2.40
$1.20
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
15,846
251,904
219,060
–
9,713
22,979
(53,429)
126,382
(43,715)
103,410
–
–
8,109
19,973
(8,109)
19,973
(44,596)
109,840
(36,488)
89,864
(186,337)
997,053
$2.29
$1.93
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsFor the year ended 30 June 201587
Offer Date
Vesting date
Value
2014
Balance 
at start of 
the year 
Number
Granted 
during the 
year 
Number
Vested 
during the 
year 
Number
Expired 
during the 
year 
Number
Forfeited 
during the 
year 
Number
Balance at 
end of the 
year 
Number
9 December 2009 31 August 2013
$1.24
169,332
20 September 2010 3 September 2013
$1.17
189,699
20 September 2010 3 September 2014
$1.19
189,702
16 February 2012
13 September 2013
$1.26
51,097
16 February 2012
12 September 2014
$1.26
281,031
16 February 2012
12 September 2014
$0.78
229,925
14 September 2012 13 September 2013
$1.74
50,983
14 September 2012 12 September 2014
$1.74
50,983
14 September 2012 14 September 2015
$1.74
280,364
14 September 2012 14 September 2015
$1.08
229,380
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
23 September 2013 12 September 2014
23 September 2013 14 September 2015
23 September 2013 14 September 2016
23 September 2013 14 September 2016
$2.77
$2.77
$2.77
$1.68
–
–
–
–
32,692
32,692
179,811
147,125
(169,332)
(189,699)
(9,250)*
(51,097)
(2,509)*
–
(50,983)
(2,293)*
(2,294)*
–
–
–
–
–
Total
1,722,496
392,320
(477,457)
Weighted average price
$1.26
$2.36
$1.27
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
180,452
–
(11,288)*
267,234
(11,287)*
218,638
–
–
–
48,690
(10,320)*
267,750
(10,320)* 219,060
–
–
–
–
32,692
32,692
179,811
147,125
(43,215)
1,594,144
$1.21
$1.53
*  FY2014 has been restated to correctly reflect the number of performance shares vested and forfeited for Simon Dehne who 
departed 31/12/13.
** The vesting date of service based performance shares for MI Russell has been brought forward from September 2015 to his 
termination date of 3 July 2015.
The weighted average remaining contractual life of performance shares outstanding at the end of the period was 
0.86 years (2014 – 0.94 years).
The model inputs for performance shares granted on 22 September 2014 included:
(a)  performance shares are granted for no consideration and vest over a period of four years;
(b)  grant date: 22 September 2014 (2014 – 23 September 2013);
(c)  share price at grant date: $2.72 (2014 – $2.77);
(d)  expected price volatility of the company’s shares: 28.23% (2014 – 27.54%);
(e)  expected dividend yield: 0% (2014 – 0%); and
(f)  risk-free interest rate: 2.614% (2014 – 2.83%).
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201588
Note 31: Share-based payments (continued)
(d)  Expenses arising from share-based payment transactions
Total expenses arising from share based payment transactions recognised during the period as part of employee 
benefit expense were as follows:
Shares issued under PSP
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
875
875
1,324
1,324
Note 32: Parent entity financial information
(a)  Summary financial information
The individual financial statements for the parent entity show the following aggregate amounts:
Balance sheet
Current assets
Total assets
Current liabilities
Total liabilities
Shareholders’ equity
Issued capital
Share-based payments reserve
Retained profits
Profit or loss for the year
Total comprehensive income
2015 
$’000
2014 
$’000
109,195
112,548
353,800
353,085
70,471
69,589
251,026
249,856
5,780
1,909
4,604
2,210
95,085
96,415
102,774
103,229
19,901
19,901
20,220
20,220
(b)  Guarantees entered into by the parent entity
The parent entity has not provided any guarantees on behalf of subsidiaries.
The parent entity has provided guarantees in respect of obligations under premises leases of its head office and state 
offices totalling $755,414 (2014 – $760,459). No liability was recognised by the parent entity or the consolidated entity in 
relation to these guarantees.
(c)  Contingent liabilities of the parent entity
Other than the guarantees mentioned above, the parent entity did not have any contingent liabilities as at 30 June 2015 
or 30 June 2014.
Notes to the Consolidated Financial StatementsFor the year ended 30 June 2015Directors’ Declaration
89
Directors’ Declaration
In the Directors’ opinion:
(a)  the financial statements and notes set out on pages 41 – 88 are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, 
including:
(i)  complying with Accounting Standards, the Corporations Regulations 2001 and other mandatory professional 
reporting requirements; and
(ii)  giving a true and fair view of the consolidated entity’s financial position as at 30 June 2014 and of their 
performance, for the financial year ended on that date; and
(b)  Note 1(a) confirms that the financial statements also comply with International Financial Reporting Standards as 
issued by the International Accounting Standards Board; and
(c)  there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become 
due and payable.
The Directors have been given the declarations by the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer required by 
Section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001.
This declaration is made in accordance with a resolution of the Directors.
Rodney Higgins 
Director
Sydney 
18 August 2015
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201590
Independent Auditor’s Report
Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
ABN 74 490 121 060
Grosvenor Place
225 George Street
Sydney  NSW  2000
PO Box N250 Grosvenor Place
Sydney NSW 1220 Australia
Tel:  +61 2 9322 7000
www.deloitte.com.au
Independent Auditor’s Report
to the Members of Mortgage Choice Limited
Report on the Financial Report
We have audited the accompanying financial report of Mortgage Choice Limited, which comprises the
balance sheet as at 30 June 2015, the income statement, the statement of comprehensive income, the
statement of cash flows and the statement of changes in  equity for the year ended on that date, notes
comprising  a  summary  of significant accounting policies and  other  explanatory  information,  and the
directors’ declaration of the consolidated entity, comprising the company and the entities it controlled
at the year’s end or from time to time during the financial year as set out on pages 41 to 89.
Directors’ Responsibility for the Financial Report
The  directors of the company are responsible for  the  preparation  of the financial report that  gives  a
true and fair view in accordance with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Act 2001
and for such internal control  as the  directors determine  is  necessary to  enable the preparation  of the
financial report that gives a true and fair view and is free from material misstatement, whether due to
fraud or error. In Note 1, the directors also state, in accordance with Accounting Standard AASB 101
Presentation  of  Financial  Statements,  that  the  consolidated  financial  statements  comply  with
International Financial Reporting Standards.
Auditor’s Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial report based on our audit. We conducted
our audit in accordance  with Australian Auditing Standards. Those standards require that we comply
with  relevant  ethical  requirements  relating  to  audit  engagements  and  plan  and  perform  the  audit  to
obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial report is free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures
in  the  financial  report.  The  procedures  selected  depend  on  the  auditor’s  judgement,  including  the
assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial report, whether due to fraud or error.
In  making  those  risk  assessments,  the  auditor  considers  internal  control,  relevant  to  the  company’s
preparation of the financial report that gives a true and fair view,  in order to design audit procedures
that  are  appropriate  in  the  circumstances,  but  not  for  the  purpose  of  expressing  an  opinion  on  the
effectiveness of the company’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness
of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the directors, as
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial report.
Limited liability by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation
Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited
Independent Auditor’s ReportFor the year ended 30 June 201591
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for
our audit opinion.
Auditor’s Independence Declaration
In conducting  our audit,  we  have  complied  with the independence requirements  of the Corporations
Act  2001.  We  confirm  that  the  independence  declaration  required  by  the Corporations  Act  2001 ,
which  has  been  given  to  the  directors  of  Mortgage  Choice  Limited,  would  be  in  the  same  terms  if
given to the directors as at the time of this auditor’s report.
Opinion
In our opinion:
(a) the financial report of Mortgage Choice Limited is in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001 ,
including:
(i) giving a  true and fair  view of the consolidated  entity’s financial position as at 30 June 2015
and of its performance for the year ended on that date; and
(ii) complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001 ; and
(b) the  consolidated  financial  statements  also  comply  with  International  Financial  Reporting
Standards as disclosed in Note 1
Report on the Remuneration Report
We have audited the Remuneration Report included in pages 15 to 38 of the directors’ report for the 
year  ended  30  June  2015. The  directors of the  company  are  responsible  for  the  preparation  and 
presentation  of the  Remuneration  Report in  accordance  with  section  300A  of  the  Corporations Act 
2001. Our responsibility  is to  express an  opinion  on  the  Remuneration  Report, based  on  our audit 
conducted in accordance with Australian Auditing Standards.
Opinion
In our opinion the Remuneration Report of Mortgage Choice Limited for the year ended 30 June 2015,
complies with section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001 .
DELOITTE TOUCHE TOHMATSU
Philip Hardy
Partner
Chartered Accountants
Sydney, 18 August 2015
Mortgage Choice Annual Report 201592
ASX Shareholder Information
The shareholder information set out below was applicable as at 14 August 2015
A.  Distribution of equity securities
Analysis of numbers of equity security holders by size of holding:
1 – 1,000
1,001 – 5,000
5,001 – 10,000
10,001 – 100,000
100,001 and over
There were 120 holders of less than a marketable parcel of ordinary shares.
Class of 
equity 
security
Ordinary 
Shares
669
1,350
694
753
43
3,509
Shareholder InformationFor the year ended 30 June 2015B.  Equity security holders
Twenty largest quoted equity security holders
The names of the twenty largest holders of quoted equity securities are listed below:
Finconnect (Australia) Pty Ltd
J P Morgan Nominees Australia Limited 
Citicorp Nominees Pty Limited 
Ochoa Pty Ltd
HSBC Custody Nominees (Australia) Limited
National Nominees Limited
Ochoa Pty Ltd 
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above