Quarterlytics / Consumer Cyclical / Restaurants / Nathan's Famous, Inc. / FY2002 Annual Report

Nathan's Famous, Inc.
Annual Report 2002

NATH · NASDAQ Consumer Cyclical
Claim this profile
Ticker NATH
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Consumer Cyclical
Industry Restaurants
Employees 147
← All annual reports
FY2002 Annual Report · Nathan's Famous, Inc.
Loading PDF…
2 0 0 2   A n n u a l   Re p o r t

A   H I S T O R Y   O F   E X C E L L E N C E ,  

A   F U T U R E   O F   O P P O R T U N I T Y.

A   Tr e a s u r e d   Tr a d i t i o n   f o r   O v e r   8 5   Ye a r s .

F i n a n c i a l   H i g h l i g h t s

Systemwide Data:

Sales**
Number of outlets, at year end***

Selected Consolidated Financial Data:

Revenues
Income (loss) before taxes*
Net earnings (loss)*
Net earnings (loss) per share*

Basic
Diluted

Weighted-average number of common shares outstanding

Basic
Diluted
Total assets
Stockholders’ equity

Fiscal Year

2002

2001

2000

(Dollars in thousands, 
except per share amounts)

$265,478
386

$287,097
411

$221,014
447

$ 44,399
$ 2,211
$ 1,249

$ 47,174
$ 3,022
$ 1,606

$ 37,891
$ (1,520)
$ (1,270)

$
$

0.18
0.18

$
$

0.23
0.23

$
$

(0.22)
(0.22)

7,048
7,083
$ 48,745
$ 36,145

7,059
7,098
$ 51,826
$ 35,031

5,881
5,881
$ 48,583
$ 33,347

*In 2000, provisions of $2.5 million or $0.42 per share were recorded associated with asset impairments, franchisee guarantees, restau-
rant closures, and bad debts.

**Includes Company-owned and franchise restaurant sales, sales to supermarkets by SMG, Inc., and sales of proprietary food and related

items under the Branded Product Program.

***Includes Company-owned restaurants and franchised and licensed restaurants.

C o r p o r a t e   P r o f i l e

Nathan’s has truly become a “Family of Brands,” uniquely and attractively positioned in today’s marketplace.

Nathan’s Famous, Kenny Rogers Roasters and Miami Subs may be advanced independently and in concert with one another,
through  co-branding,  in  traditional  and  captive-market  restaurant  environments,  both  domestically  and  internationally.  The 
signature products of each brand also provide opportunities to be marketed throughout a wide and diverse spectrum of alter-
nate channels of distribution.

Leveraging the equity of our highly recognized and valued brands and quality products through the implementation of a brand
marketing and points-of-distribution strategy provides for new and exciting, expansive growth opportunities.

S T O C K H O L D E R S ’   L E T T E R

Fellow Shareholders:

Fiscal 2002 has been a year accentuated by both significant advances and challenges at Nathan’s.

Points-of-Distribution Strategy

We  have  continued  to  advance  our  successful,  brand-marketing  approach  and  points-of-distribution  strategy. 
In  particular,  the  exposure  of  the  Nathan’s  Famous  brand  and  the  sale  of  our  signature  hot  dog  products  have
increased substantially.

Our Branded Product Program, featuring the sale of Nathan’s Famous hot dogs to the foodservice industry, realized
sales gains of more than 25%. Today, there are approximately 1,500 locations where the Nathan’s Famous trademark
is  prominently  displayed  and  our  hot  dogs  are  featured  for  sale.  The  Nathan’s  Famous  Branded  Product  Program
continues to provide an exceptionally attractive opportunity to foodservice operators in a myriad of diverse venues
to capitalize on Nathan’s Famous highly-valued brand equity and superior products.

We continue to benefit from our licensing arrangement with SMG for the nationwide sale of our packaged hot dogs
in  supermarkets,  grocery  stores,  and  other  outlets.  In  fiscal  2002,  as  in  each  of  the  past  five  years,  the  sales 
of  Nathan’s  Famous  products  generated  by  SMG  and  the  corresponding  royalty  that  we  derive  has  increased 
compared to levels actualized in the prior year. Nathan’s Famous products are now available for sale in more than
6,000 supermarkets and club stores throughout the United States.

Restaurant Operations

The foundation of our business remains our restaurant operations. Today, there are 364 franchised or licensed restaurants
and  22  company-owned  restaurants  systemwide,  which  includes  Nathan’s  Famous,  Miami  Subs  and  Kenny  Rogers
Roasters outlets. We also have an agreement permitting us to use the Arthur Treacher’s brand and their products in
co-branded  environments.  Nathan’s  Famous  restaurants  are  primarily  located  in  New  York  and  in  non-traditional,
captive-market  settings.  Miami  Subs  restaurants  are  predominantly  situated  in  Florida  and  Kenny  Rogers  Roasters
restaurants are mainly located in Asia.

Nathan’s Famous restaurants operate in traditional locations; however, the majority of our units are located in captive-
market venues including: malls, airports, highway travel locations, colleges and universities, and within casino hotels
and other entertainment environments. During fiscal 2002, the same-store sales of Nathan’s Famous company-owned
and franchised units increased compared to the prior year.

Nathan’s Famous, Inc. & Subsidiaries

1

2002 Annual Report

F O C U S E D   S T R A T E G I E S

In  the  initial  weeks  following  the  events  of  September  11,  2001,  there  was  a  decline  in  revenues  in  a  significant
number  of  company  and  franchised  restaurants,  operating  primarily  in  Las  Vegas,  South  Florida,  and  at  airports
throughout the United States. Sales have since rebounded in Las Vegas and at airports, but have remained negatively
impacted in the South Florida market.

Co-Branding

During this past fiscal year, we have made significant progress introducing new brands and products into existing
restaurants. Arthur Treacher’s has been added to the menus of 133 Nathan’s Famous, Miami Subs and Kenny Rogers
Roasters restaurants. Nathan’s has been added to the menus of 88 Miami Subs and Kenny Rogers Roasters restaurants
and Kenny Rogers Roasters has been introduced into 79 Nathan’s Famous and Miami Subs restaurants.

Currently, 102 Miami Subs restaurants have introduced a co-branded menu consisting of Nathan’s Famous, Kenny Rogers
Roasters, or Arthur Treacher’s signature products. We have created a new image for Miami Subs based upon this
co-branding strategy called “Miami Subs Plus!” which has been marketed in southern Florida beginning in July 2001.

On a corporate level, Nathan’s Board of Directors authorized management to repurchase up to one million shares
of the Company’s common stock, pursuant to a repurchase program commencing on September 14, 2001. As of
June 7, 2002, the Company had purchased 792,691 shares of common stock.

In Conclusion

Today, our Company is engaged in business in 39 states, the District of Columbia, and 14 foreign countries, featuring
the Nathan’s Famous, Miami Subs and Kenny Rogers Roasters brands. We intend to enhance our existing operations,
as well as grow both nationally and internationally, by expanding our restaurant presence and continuing to capitalize
on our points-of-distribution strategies.

As we continue to expand and pursue profitable, new opportunities to market our products, we will retain our stead-
fast commitment to quality and endeavor to serve our shareholders responsibly. We remain extremely appreciative of
your continued support.

Sincerely,

Howard M. Lorber
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Wayne Norbitz
President and Chief Operating Officer

Nathan’s Famous, Inc. & Subsidiaries

2

2002 Annual Report

S E L E C T E D   C O N S O L I D A T E D   F I N A N C I A L   D A TA
(in thousands, except per share amounts)

Fiscal Years Ended

March 31, March 25, March 26, March 28, March 29,
2000

2002

2001

1998

1999

Statement of Operations Data:
Revenues:
Sales
Franchise fees and royalties
License royalties, investment and other income

Total revenues

Costs and Expenses:

Cost of sales
Restaurant operating expenses
Depreciation and amortization
Amortization of intangible assets
General and administrative expenses
Interest expense
Impairment of long-lived assets
Impairment of notes receivable
Other (income) expense

Total costs and expenses

Income (loss) before provision (benefit) 

for income taxes

Provision (benefit) for income taxes

Net income (loss)

Per Share Data:
Net income (loss)

Basic
Diluted
Dividends
Weighted average shares used in computing 

net income (loss) per share

Basic
Diluted(1)

Balance Sheet Data at End of Fiscal Year:

Working capital (deficit)
Total assets
Long-term debt, net of current maturities
Stockholders’ equity

Selected Restaurant Operating Data:
Systemwide Restaurant Sales:

Company-owned
Franchised

Total

Number of Units Open at End of Fiscal Year:

Company-owned
Franchised

Total

$ 32,349
7,944
4,106

$ 34,799
8,814
3,561

$ 29,642
5,906
2,343

$23,964
3,230
1,953

44,399

47,174

37,891

29,147

$22,971
3,062
2,393

28,426

21,643
7,788
1,661
888
9,292
256
685
185
(210)

42,188

22,530
8,964
1,791
839
8,978
310
127
151
462

44,152

18,977
8,208
1,358
716
8,222
198
465
840
427

39,411

14,932
5,780
1,065
384
4,722
1
302
—
(349)

26,837

2,211
962

3,022
1,416

(1,520)
(250)

2,310
(418)

14,017
6,411
1,035
384
4,755
6
—
—
—

26,608

1,818
290

$ 1,249

$

1,606

$ (1,270)

$ 2,728

$ 1,528

$
$

0.18
0.18
—

$
$

0.23
0.23
—

$
$

(0.22)
(0.22)
—

$
$

0.58
0.57
—

$
$

0.32
0.32
—

7,048
7,083

7,059
7,098

5,881
5,881

4,722
4,753

$ 9,565
48,745
1,220
$ 36,145

$

5,210
51,826
1,789
$ 35,031

$

(322)
48,583
3,131
$ 33,347

$ 3,708
31,250
0
$26,348

$ 27,484
185,389

$ 30,946
208,889

$ 27,478
152,627

$21,981
64,178

$212,873

$239,835

$180,105

$86,159

22
364

386

25
386

411

32
415

447

25
163

188

4,722
4,749

$ 6,105
29,539
9
$23,586

$22,332
58,802

$81,134

27
156

183

Notes to Selected Financial Data
(1) Common stock equivalents have been excluded from the computation for the year ended March 26, 2000 as the impact of their

inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

Nathan’s Famous, Inc. & Subsidiaries

3

2002 Annual Report

M A N A G E M E N T ’ S   D I S C U S S I O N   A N D   A N A LY S I S  
O F   F I N A N C I A L   C O N D I T I O N   A N D   R E S U LT S   O F   O P E R A T I O N S

Introduction

As used in this Report, the terms “we,” “us,” “our” and
“Nathan’s”  mean  Nathan’s  Famous,  Inc.  and  its  subsid-
iaries (unless the context indicates a different meaning).
During the fiscal year ended March 26, 2000, we com-
pleted two acquisitions that provided us with two highly
recognized  brands.  On  April  1,  1999,  we  became  the
franchisor of the Kenny Rogers Roasters restaurant 
system  by  acquiring  the  intellectual  property  rights,
including trademarks, recipes and franchise agreements
of Roasters Corp. and Roasters Franchise Corp. On
September 30, 1999, we acquired the remaining 70% of
the  outstanding  common  stock  of  Miami  Subs  Corpo-
ration  we  did  not  already  own.  Our  revenues  are  gen-
erated  primarily  from  operating  company-owned
restaurants  and  franchising  the  Nathan’s,  Miami  Subs
and Kenny Rogers restaurant concepts, licensing agree-
ments  for  the  sale  of  Nathan’s  products  within  super-
markets  and  selling  products  under  Nathan’s  Branded
Product  Program.  The  Branded  Product  Program
enables foodservice operators to offer Nathan’s hot dogs
and  other  proprietary  items  for  sale  within  their  facili-
ties. In conjunction with this program, foodservice oper-
ators are granted a limited use of the Nathan’s trademark
with  respect  to  the  sale  of  hot  dogs  and  certain  other
proprietary food items and paper goods.

In addition to plans for expansion through franchising
and  our  Branded  Product  Program,  Nathan’s  is  con-
tinuing  to  capitalize  on  the  co-branding  opportunities
within its existing restaurant system. To date, the Arthur
Treacher’s  brand  has  been  introduced  within  133
Nathan’s, Kenny Rogers Roasters and Miami Subs restau-
rants,  the  Nathan’s  brand  has  been  added  to  the  menu
of  88  Miami  Subs  and  Kenny  Rogers  restaurants,  while
the  Kenny  Rogers  Roasters  brand  has  been  introduced
into  79  Miami  Subs  and  Nathan’s  restaurants.  We  have
begun testing the Miami Subs brand in three company-
owned Nathan’s restaurants and one Kenny Rogers fran-
chised restaurant.

In connection with our acquisition of Miami Subs, we
determined that up to 18 underperforming restaurants
would  be  closed  pursuant  to  our  divestiture  plan.
Through March 31, 2002, we have terminated leases on
15  of  those  properties.  We  continue  to  market  two  of
those properties for sale and terminated the lease for the
last unit upon the lease expiration in May 2002. We also
terminated 10 additional leases for properties outside of
the divestiture plan.

In the wake of the events of September 11, 2001, we
have  experienced  lower  sales  at  company-owned
restaurants  and  lower  royalties  from  franchised  restau-
rants that operate in markets which are significant tourist 
destinations such as Las Vegas and South Florida. During
the initial months subsequent to September 11, we real-
ized  declines  at  our  franchised  restaurants  operating  at
airports  throughout  the  United  States  as  a  result  of  the
overall decline in airline traffic.

At March 31, 2002, our combined system consisted of
364  franchised  or  licensed  units,  22  company-owned
units  and  approximately  1,500  Nathan’s  Branded
Product points of sale that feature Nathan’s world famous
all-beef  hot  dogs,  located  in  39  states,  the  District  of
Columbia  and  14  foreign  countries.  At  March  31,  2002,
our company-owned restaurant system included 16
Nathan’s  units,  four  Miami  Subs  units  and  two  Kenny
Rogers Roasters units, as compared to 17 Nathan’s units,
six  Miami  Subs  units  and  two  Kenny  Rogers  Roasters
units at March 25, 2001.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements and the notes to
our  consolidated  financial  statements  contain  informa-
tion  that  is  pertinent  to  management’s  discussion  and
analysis. The preparation of financial statements in con-
formity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the  United  States  requires  management  to  make  esti-
mates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of  assets  and  liabilities  and  disclosures  of  contingent
assets  and  liabilities.  We  believe  the  following  critical
accounting  policies  involve  additional  management
judgment  due  to  the  sensitivity  of  the  methods,
assumptions and estimates necessary in determining the
related asset and liability amounts.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS
No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived
Assets  and  for  Long-Lived  Assets  to  be  Disposed  Of,”
requires  management  judgments  regarding  the  future
operating  and  disposition  plans  for  underperforming
assets,  and  estimates  of  expected  realizable  values  for
assets  to  be  sold.  The  application  of  SFAS  No.  121  has
affected the amounts and timing of charges to operating
results in recent years. We evaluate possible impairment
of  each  restaurant  individually,  and  record  an  impair-
ment  charge  whenever  we  determine  that  impairment
factors  exist.  We  consider  a  history  of  restaurant  oper-
ating  losses  to  be  the  primary  indicator  of  potential
impairment of a restaurant’s carrying value. We have
identified  certain  restaurants  that  have  been  impaired
and  recorded  impairment  charges  of  approximately
$685,000 (relating to two restaurants), $127,000 (relating
to one restaurant) and $465,000 (relating to three restau-
rants)  in  the  consolidated  statements  of  operations  for
fiscal years 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS
No.  114,  “Accounting  by  Creditors  for  Impairment  of  a
Loan,”  requires  management  judgments  regarding  the 
future  collectibility  of  notes  receivable  and  the  under-
lying  fair  market  value  of  collateral.  We  consider  the 
following  factors  when  evaluating  a  note  for  impair-
ment:  1)  indications  that  the  borrower  is  experiencing
business  problems  such  as  operating  losses,  marginal
working capital, inadequate cash flow or business inter-
ruptions;  2)  whether  the  loan  is  secured  by  collateral
that is not readily marketable; or 3) whether the collateral

Nathan’s Famous, Inc. & Subsidiaries

4

2002 Annual Report

is susceptible to deterioration in realizable value. When
determining  possible  impairment,  we  also  assess  our
future  intention  to  extend  certain  leases  beyond  the
minimum  lease  term  and  the  note  holder’s  ability  to
meet  its  obligation  over  that  extended  term.  We  have
identified  certain  notes  receivable  that  have  been
impaired  and  recorded  impairment  charges  of  approxi-
mately $185,000 (relating to two loans), $151,000 (relat-
ing to one loan) and $840,000 (relating to six loans) in
the consolidated statements of operations for fiscal years
2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

In the normal course of business, we extend credit to
franchisees for the payment of ongoing royalties and to
trade customers of our Branded Product Program. Notes
and accounts receivable, net, as shown on our consoli-
dated balance sheets were net of allowances for doubt-
ful  accounts.  An  allowance  for  doubtful  accounts  is
determined  through  analysis  of  the  aging  of  accounts
receivable at the date of the financial statements, assess-
ment  of  collectibility  based  upon  historical  trends  and
an  evaluation  of  the  impact  of  current  and  projected
economic conditions. In the event that the collectibility
of a receivable is doubtful, the associated revenue is not
recorded  until  the  facts  and  circumstances  change  in
accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin SAB No. 101,
“Revenue Recognition.”

We are self-insured for portions of our general liability
coverage. As part of our risk management strategy, our
insurance  programs  include  deductibles  for  each  inci-
dent and in the aggregate for a policy year. As such, we
accrue  estimates  of  our  ultimate  self-insurance  costs
throughout  the  policy  year.  These  estimates  have  been
developed  based  upon  our  historical  trends,  however,
the  final  cost  of  many  of  these  claims  may  not  be
known for five years or longer. Accordingly, our annual
self-insurance  costs  may  be  subject  to  adjustment  from
previous estimates as facts and circumstances change.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, or SFAS
No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” requires
that  goodwill  and  intangible  assets  with  indefinite  lives
will no longer be amortized but will be reviewed annu-
ally  (or  more  frequently  if  impairment  indicators  arise) 
for  impairment,  requiring  significant  management  judg-
ment. Separable intangible assets that are not deemed to
have indefinite lives will continue to be amortized over
their useful lives (but with no maximum life). The amorti-
zation provisions of SFAS No. 142 apply to goodwill and
intangible assets acquired after June 30, 2001. There are
also  transition  provisions  that  apply  to  business  com-
binations completed before July 1, 2001, that were
accounted for by the purchase method. With respect to its
goodwill  and  intangible  assets  acquired  prior  to  July  1,
2001, Nathan’s is required to adopt SFAS No. 142 effec-
tive  in  its  next  fiscal  year,  commencing  April  1,  2002.
Nathan’s  will  no  longer  amortize  existing  goodwill  and
certain intangibles having indefinite lives, thus reducing
amortization  expense  by  approximately  $600,000  per
year.  We  expect  to  complete  our  impairment  analysis
during the first quarter fiscal 2003 and expect to recog-
nize an impairment charge of approximately $12 to $13
million upon adoption of SFAS No. 142.

Results of Operations

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2002 Compared to 
Fiscal Year Ended March 25, 2001
Revenues

Total sales decreased by 7.0% or $2,450,000 to
$32,349,000  for  the  fifty-three  weeks  ended  March  31,
2002  (“fiscal  2002  period”)  as  compared  to  $34,799,000
for  the  fifty-two  weeks  ended  March  25,  2001  (“fiscal
2001 period”). Sales from the Branded Product Program
increased  by  26.2%  or  $1,011,000  to  $4,864,000  for  the
fiscal  2002  period  as  compared  to  sales  of  $3,853,000 
in  the  fiscal  2001  period.  Company-owned  restaurant
sales decreased 11.2% or $3,461,000 to $27,485,000 from
$30,946,000  primarily  due  to  operating  nine  fewer
company-owned  stores  as  compared  to  the  prior  fiscal
period  and  lower  sales  at  the  two  new  restaurants  that
began  operating  during  the  fiscal  2001  period.  These
reductions were partially offset by sales during the fiscal
2002 period from a restaurant that was closed for reno-
vation during the fiscal 2001 period and increased sales
at the Coney Island restaurant during the summer season.
Fiscal 2002 was a 53-week reporting period while fiscal
2001 was a 52-week reporting period. Approximately
$390,000  in  restaurant  sales  were  generated  during  the
additional week of operations. The unit reduction is the
result of our franchising two company-owned restau-
rants,  transferring  one  company-owned  restaurant  to  a
franchisee  pursuant  to  a  management  agreement,  clos-
ing  four  unprofitable  company-owned  units  (including
three  Miami  Subs  restaurants  pursuant  to  our  divesture
plan), selling one unit pursuant to an order of condem-
nation and closing one unit due to its lease expiration.
The  financial  impact  associated  with  these  nine  restau-
rants  lowered  restaurant  sales  by  $3,749,000  and
improved restaurant operating profits by $30,000 versus
the fiscal 2001 period, excluding any one-time gains or
royalties  to  be  received  from  restaurants  sold  to  fran-
chisees.  Comparable  restaurant  sales  (consisting  of  15
Nathan’s and four Miami Subs restaurants that have been
operating for 18 months or longer as of the beginning of
the  fiscal  year)  during  the  comparable  52-week  period
increased by 2.5% versus the fiscal 2001 period.

Franchise  fees  and  royalties  decreased  by  9.9%  or
$870,000  to  $7,944,000  in  the  fiscal  2002  period  com-
pared to $8,814,000 in the fiscal 2001 period. Franchise
royalties decreased by $1,299,000 or 16.1% to $6,761,000
in  the  fiscal  2002  period  as  compared  to  $8,060,000  in
the  fiscal  2001  period.  Domestic  franchise  restaurant
sales decreased by 11.2% to $185,389,000 in the fiscal
2002  period  as  compared  to  $208,889,000  in  the  fiscal
2001 period. The majority of this decline is due to fewer
franchised  restaurants  operating  during  the  fiscal  2002
period  as  compared  to  the  fiscal  2001  period.  During 
the  initial  months  subsequent  to  September  11,  2001, 
we  have  experienced  lower  royalties  from  franchised
restaurants that operate in markets which are significant
tourist destinations, such as Las Vegas and South Florida,
and  from  franchised  restaurants  operating  at  airports
throughout the United States. Further contributing to the
decline is an increase in the amount of royalties deemed
to  be  unrealizable.  At  March  31,  2002,  364  franchised 

Nathan’s Famous, Inc. & Subsidiaries

5

2002 Annual Report

or  licensed  restaurants  were  operating  as  compared  to
386 franchised or licensed restaurants at March 25, 2001.
Franchise  fee  income  derived  from  new  openings  and
co-branding  was  $875,000  in  the  fiscal  2002  period  as
compared  to  $754,000  in  the  fiscal  2001  period.  This
increase  was  primarily  attributable  to  the  fees  earned
from  the  co-branding  initiative  within  the  existing
restaurant system. During the fiscal 2002 period, 18 new
franchised  or  licensed  units  opened  and  47  units  have
been  co-branded.  During  the  fiscal  2002  period,  we 
realized $308,000 in connection with forfeited develop-
ment fees.

License  royalties  were  $2,038,000  in  the  fiscal  2002
period  as  compared  to  $1,958,000  in  the  fiscal  2001
period.  This  increase  is  comprised  of  higher  royalties
earned  from  sales  by  SMG,  Inc.,  Nathan’s  licensee  for
the  sale  of  Nathan’s  frankfurters  within  supermarkets
and club stores.

Investment  and  other  income  was  $2,068,000  in  the 
fiscal  2002  period  versus  $1,603,000  in  the  fiscal  2001
period.  During  the  fiscal  2002  period,  Nathan’s  recog-
nized net gains of 1,226,000 in connection with the sale
of  two  company-owned  restaurants  and  a  third  non-
restaurant  property.  During  the  fiscal  2002  period,
Nathan’s  investment  and  interest  income  was  approxi-
mately  $342,000  higher  than  in  the  fiscal  2001  period 
due primarily to differences in performance of the finan-
cial markets between the two periods. In the fiscal 2001
period,  Nathan’s  recognized  income  of  approximately
$479,000  in  connection  with  the  introduction  of  a  con-
solidated  food  distribution  agreement  and  earned  a
$500,000  transfer  fee  in  connection  with  a  change  in
ownership of Nathan’s licensee, SMG, Inc.
Costs and Expenses

Cost of sales decreased by $887,000 to $21,643,000 in
the fiscal 2002 period from $22,530,000 in the fiscal 2001
period. During the fiscal 2002 period, restaurant cost of
sales were lower than the fiscal 2001 period by approx-
imately  $1,986,000.  Restaurant  cost  of  sales  were
reduced by approximately $2,423,000 as a result of oper-
ating  fewer  company-owned  restaurants.  Additionally,
lower  cost  of  sales  at  the  two  Kenny  Rogers  Roasters
restaurants  opened  last  year  offset  the  higher  costs  at
our  comparable  restaurants.  Notwithstanding  the  lower
costs  and  expenses  of  the  two  Kenny  Rogers  Roasters 
restaurants,  these  restaurants  continued  to  underper-
form. Consequently, we have decided to sell the Kenny
Rogers  Roasters  restaurant  in  Rockville  Centre,  New
York.  The  cost  of  restaurant  sales  at  our  comparable
units  as  a  percentage  of  restaurant  sales  was  62.5%  in
the fiscal 2002 period as compared to 61.3% in the fiscal
2001  period  due  primarily  to  higher  labor  and  related
costs.  Higher  costs  of  approximately  $1,100,000  were
incurred in connection with the growth of our Branded
Product  Program  and  higher  product  costs  incurred  for
much of the fiscal 2002 period. During the first twenty-
six  weeks  of  fiscal  2002,  commodity  prices  of  our  pri-
mary  meat  products  were  at  their  highest  levels  in
recent  years  causing  the  majority  of  the  cost  increase. 
In response, we raised retail prices on a selective basis in
an attempt to partially offset these increases. Beginning

in the third quarter fiscal 2002, these costs were lowered
to their historical levels. However, should costs escalate
again for an extended period, we may determine to fur-
ther examine our pricing structure to attempt to reduce
the impact on our margins.

Restaurant operating expenses decreased by $1,176,000
to  $7,788,000  in  the  fiscal  2002  period  from  $8,964,000
in  the  fiscal  2001  period.  Restaurant  operating  costs
were  lower  in  the  fiscal  2002  period  by  approximately
$1,357,000,  as  compared  to  the  fiscal  2001  period  as  a
result of operating fewer restaurants. Restaurant operat-
ing  expenses  of  the  two  restaurants  opened  last  year
were $92,000 lower during the fiscal 2002 period due in
part to the higher costs attributable to last year’s open-
ings. These reductions in restaurant operating expenses
were  partially  offset  by  an  increase  of  approximately
$268,000 at the comparable restaurants which were pri-
marily driven by higher marketing and insurance costs.
Depreciation and amortization decreased by $130,000
to  $1,661,000  in  the  fiscal  2002  period  from  $1,791,000
in the fiscal 2001 period. Lower depreciation expense of
operating fewer company-owned restaurants during the
fiscal 2002 period versus the fiscal 2001 period was par-
tially offset by additional depreciation expense attributa-
ble to last year’s capital spending.

Amortization  of  intangibles  increased  by  $49,000  to
$888,000 in the fiscal 2002 period from $839,000 in the
fiscal 2001 period. Amortization of intangibles increased
as a result of last year’s final purchase price allocation of
the Miami Subs acquisition.

General  and  administrative  expenses  increased  by
$314,000 to $9,292,000 in the fiscal 2002 period as com-
pared  to  $8,978,000  in  the  fiscal  2001  period.  The
increase in general and administrative expenses was due
primarily  to  higher  legal  and  professional  expenses  of
approximately  $544,000,  including  a  litigation  expense
of  $450,000,  and  higher  bad  debts  of  approximately
$76,000  which  were  partly  offset  by  lower  personnel
and  incentive  compensation  expense  of  approximately
$389,000.

Interest  expense  was  $256,000  during  the  fiscal  2002
period  as  compared  to  $310,000  during  the  fiscal  2001
period. The reduction in interest expense relates prima-
rily  to  the  repayment  of  outstanding  debt  between  the
two periods.

Impairment  charges  on  fixed  assets  of  $685,000  dur-
ing the fiscal 2002 period and $127,000 during the fiscal
2001  period  reflect  write-downs  relating  to  two  under-
performing  stores  in  the  fiscal  2002  period  and  one
underperforming store in the fiscal 2001 period.

Impairment  charges  on  notes  receivable  of  $185,000
during  the  fiscal  2002  period  and  $151,000  during  the
fiscal 2001 period relate to write-downs of two and one
notes receivable, respectively.

Other  income  of  $210,000  in  the  fiscal  2002  period
represents  the  reversal  of  a  previously  recorded  litiga-
tion  provision  for  an  award  that  was  settled,  upon
appeal, in our favor. Other expense of $462,000 during
the fiscal 2001 period relates primarily to lease termina-
tion  expenses  of  units  that  were  not  part  of  the  final
divestiture plan of $463,000.

Nathan’s Famous, Inc. & Subsidiaries

6

2002 Annual Report

Income Tax Expense

In  the  fiscal  2002  period,  the  income  tax  provision
was  $962,000  or  43.5%  of  income  before  income  taxes
as  compared  to  $1,416,000  or  46.9%  of  income  before
income taxes in the fiscal 2001 period.

Fiscal Year Ended March 25, 2001 Compared to 
Fiscal Year Ended March 26, 2000

Effective October 1, 1999, the results of Miami Subs Cor-
poration have been included in the consolidated results
of  Nathan’s  Famous,  Inc.  Our  results  of  operations  for
the fifty-two weeks ended March 26, 2000 included the
operations  of  Miami  Subs  for  approximately  twenty-six
weeks as compared to including fifty-two weeks of such
operations  for  the  period  ended  March  25,  2001.  The
results  of  Miami  Subs’  operations  for  the  twenty-six-
week period ended September 24, 2000 have been sep-
arately  stated  to  quantify  that  impact  on  the  fifty-two
weeks of operations for the non-comparable period.
Revenues

Total  sales  increased  by  17.4%  or  $5,157,000  to
$34,799,000  for  the  fifty-two  weeks  ended  March  25,
2001  (“fiscal  2001  period”)  as  compared  to  $29,642,000
for  the  fifty-two  weeks  ended  March  26,  2000  (“fiscal
2000  period”).  Of  the  total  increase,  sales  increased  by
$5,968,000  during  the  twenty-six-week  period  ended
September 24, 2000 as a result of the Miami Subs acqui-
sition  made  last  year,  offset  by  a  sales  decline  of
$811,000  primarily  due  to  the  operation  of  18  fewer
company-owned  stores  as  compared  to  the  prior  fiscal
period  which  was  partly  offset  by  sales  from  newly
opened restaurants and increased sales of our Branded
Products.  This  unit  reduction  is  the  result  of  our  fran-
chising  eight  company-owned  restaurants,  transferring
one company-owned restaurant to a franchisee pursuant
to a management agreement, closing seven unprofitable
company-owned  units  (including  three  Miami  Subs
restaurants  pursuant  to  our  divesture  plan)  and  closing
two units due to lease expirations. The financial impact
associated  with  these  18  restaurants  lowered  restaurant
sales  by  $4,299,000  and  improved  restaurant  operating
profits  by  $135,000  versus  the  fiscal  2000  period.
Additionally,  one  unit  was  temporarily  closed  during
part  of  the  fiscal  2001  period  for  renovation.  This  unit
re-opened in October 2000. Comparable restaurant sales
of  the  company-owned  Nathan’s  brand  (neither  Miami
Subs  nor  Roasters  company-owned  restaurants  were
deemed to be comparable units based upon their period
of  operation  under  our  ownership)  also  declined  by
1.5%  versus  the  fiscal  2000  period,  due  principally  to
weakness  experienced  at  the  Coney  Island  restaurant
primarily attributable to the unfavorable weather condi-
tions  experienced  earlier  in  the  fiscal  year.  During  the
fiscal 2001 period, sales from two new company-owned
restaurants  were  $2,343,000.  Sales  from  the  Branded
Product  Program  increased  by  78.1%  to  $3,853,000  for
the fiscal 2001 period as compared to sales of $2,163,000
in the fiscal 2000 period.

Franchise  fees  and  royalties  increased  by  49.2%  or
$2,908,000 to $8,814,000 in the fiscal 2001 period com-
pared to $5,906,000 in the fiscal 2000 period. Increases in
franchise  fees  and  royalties  during  the  twenty-six-week

period  ended  September  24,  2000  resulting  from  the
Miami  Subs  acquisition  made  last  year  was  $2,397,000.
Franchise  sales  of  Nathan’s  three  restaurant  concepts
increased  by  36.9%  to  $208,889,000  in  the  fiscal  2001
period  as  compared  to  $152,627,000  in  the  fiscal  2000
period  due  primarily  to  the  inclusion  of  Miami  Subs
franchise  system  sales  for  the  entire  fiscal  2001  period
compared to twenty-six weeks for the fiscal 2000 period.
Franchise  royalties  were  $8,060,000  in  the  fiscal  2001
period  as  compared  to  $5,167,000  in  the  fiscal  2000
period.  Franchise  fee  income  derived  from  new  unit
openings  and  our  co-branding  initiative  were  $754,000
in the fiscal 2001 period as compared to $739,000 in the
fiscal 2000 period. This increase was primarily attributa-
ble to the number of franchised units opened between
the  two  periods,  franchise  fees  earned  from  the  co-
branded  restaurant  conversions  and  the  difference
between expired franchise fees recognized into income.
During the fiscal 2001 period, seventeen new franchised
or licensed units opened.

License  royalties  were  $1,958,000  in  the  fiscal  2001
period  as  compared  to  $1,906,000  in  the  fiscal  2000
period. Royalties earned from the sale of Nathan’s frank-
furters  within  supermarkets  and  club  stores  were
approximately  $1,614,000  during  the  fiscal  2001  period
as compared to $1,432,000 during the fiscal 2000 period.
Royalties  from  the  sale  of  proprietary  spices  and  mari-
nade  were  approximately  $228,000  in  the  fiscal  2001
period  as  compared  to  $184,000  in  the  fiscal  2000
period. During the fiscal 2001 period, we terminated an
agreement  with  a  licensee  which  lowered  our  revenue
for the fiscal 2001 period by approximately $125,000 as
compared to the fiscal 2000 period.

Equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliate of $163,000
in  the  fiscal  2000  period  represented  Nathan’s  propor-
tionate  share  of  Miami  Subs’  net  loss  for  the  period
March  1,  1999  through  September  30,  1999,  which  has
been reported on a one-month lag since the acquisition
of the 30% equity interest. Included in Miami Subs’ net
loss for the period were merger costs of $325,000.

Investment and other income increased by $1,003,000
to  $1,603,000  in  the  fiscal  2001  period  versus  $600,000
in the fiscal 2000 period. Increases in other income dur-
ing  the  twenty-six-week  period  ended  September  24,
2000  as  a  result  of  the  Miami  Subs  acquisition  made 
last  year  was  $392,000.  During  the  fiscal  2001  period,
Nathan’s  recognized  income  of  approximately  $694,000
in  connection  with  the  introduction  of  a  consolidated
food distribution system for its three restaurant concepts
and the ongoing recognition of deferred marketing sup-
port. The increase is also attributable to a transfer fee of
$500,000  that  was  earned  in  connection  with  a  change
in ownership of Nathan’s licensee, SMG, Inc. Investment
income was approximately $756,000 less than the fiscal
2000 period due primarily to the difference in perform-
ance  of  the  financial  markets  between  the  two  periods
which  was  partially  offset  by  higher  interest  income  of
approximately $195,000.
Costs and Expenses

Cost of sales increased by $3,553,000 to $22,530,000 in
the fiscal 2001 period from $18,977,000 in the fiscal 2000
period. Of the total increase, cost of sales increased by

Nathan’s Famous, Inc. & Subsidiaries

7

2002 Annual Report

$3,837,000  during  the  twenty-six-week  period  ended
September 24, 2000 as a result of the Miami Subs acqui-
sition  made  last  year.  Cost  of  sales  attributable  to  two
new  company-owned  restaurants  along  with  higher
labor  costs  in  the  Nathan’s  brand  partially  offset  lower
costs  of  operating  fewer  company-owned  restaurants
totaling  $2,969,000  as  compared  to  the  fiscal  2000
period. The cost of restaurant sales at Nathan’s compa-
rable units was 60.2% as a percentage of restaurant sales
in the fiscal 2001 period as compared to 60.0% as a per-
centage of restaurant sales in the fiscal 2000 period due
primarily to higher labor costs (neither Miami Subs nor
Roasters  company-owned  restaurants  were  deemed  to
be comparable units based upon their period of opera-
tion under our ownership). Higher cost of sales totaling
approximately  $1,152,000  were  incurred  in  connection
with the growth of the Branded Product Program.

Restaurant operating expenses increased by $756,000
to  $8,964,000  in  the  fiscal  2001  period  from  $8,208,000
in the fiscal 2000 period. Restaurant operating expenses
increased  by  $1,687,000  during  the  twenty-six-week
period ended September 24, 2000 as a result of the
Miami  Subs  acquisition  made  last  year.  Lower  costs  of
$1,622,000  were  attributable  to  the  closed  company-
owned restaurants as compared to the end of fiscal 2000
which  were  partially  offset  by  higher  costs  of  approxi-
mately  $735,000  from  operating  two  new  Roasters
restaurants  and  higher  utility  costs  at  company-owned
comparable restaurants.

Depreciation  and  amortization  increased  by  $433,000
to $1,791,000 in the fiscal 2001 period from $1,358,000 in
the  fiscal  2000  period.  Depreciation  expense  increased
by  $403,000  during  the  twenty-six-week  period  ended
September 24, 2000 as a result of the Miami Subs acqui-
sition made last year. Depreciation expense attributable
to  new  company-owned  restaurants  and  the  remaining
capital spending for the fiscal 2001 period was partially
offset  by  the  lower  depreciation  expense  of  operat-
ing  fewer  company-owned  restaurants  versus  the  fiscal
2000 period.

Amortization  of  intangibles  increased  by  $123,000  to
$839,000 in the fiscal 2001 period from $716,000 in the
fiscal 2000 period primarily as a result of the Miami Subs 
acquisition made last year which is attributable to intan-
gible assets acquired and the amortization of the excess
purchase price.

General  and  administrative  expenses  increased  by
$756,000 to $8,978,000 in the fiscal 2001 period as com-
pared  to  $8,222,000  in  the  fiscal  2000  period.  General
and administrative expenses increased by approximately
$1,562,000  during  the  twenty-six-week  period  ended
September 24, 2000 as a result of the Miami Subs acqui-
sition  made  last  year.  General  and  administrative
expenses, excluding the impact of Miami Subs, decreased
by $806,000 primarily due to lower bad debt expense of
approximately $739,000 and certain rebates of approxi-
mately  $178,000,  which  were  partially  offset  by  higher
spending in connection with personnel costs and incen-
tive compensation of approximately $245,000.

Interest  expense  was  $310,000  during  the  fiscal  2001
period  as  compared  to  $198,000  during  the  fiscal  2000
period. Interest expense increased principally due to the

different  periods  of  time  that  Miami  Subs  has  been
owned  by  Nathan’s,  which  expense  has  been  reduced
by the repayment of some of the Miami Subs’ assumed
debt since the date of the acquisition.

Impairment  charges  on  notes  receivable  of  $151,000
during  the  fiscal  2001  period  and  $840,000  during  the
fiscal 2000 period relate to write-downs of one and six
notes receivable, respectively.

Impairment  charges  on  fixed  assets  of  $127,000  dur-
ing the fiscal 2001 period and $465,000 during the fiscal
2000  period  reflect  write-downs  relating  to  one  under-
performing  store  in  the  fiscal  2001  period  and  three
underperforming stores in the fiscal 2000 period.

Other  expense  of  $462,000  during  the  fiscal  2001
period relates primarily to lease termination expenses of
units  that  were  not  part  of  the  final  divestiture  plan  of
$463,000.  During  the  fiscal  2000  period,  other  expense
of  $427,000  included  approximately  $191,000  in  lease
expense  resulting  from  the  default  of  subleases  and
$236,000  in  connection  with  the  satisfaction  of  certain
financial guarantees.
Income Tax Expense

In  the  fiscal  2001  period,  the  income  tax  provision
was $1,416,000 or 46.9% of income before income taxes
as  compared  to  an  income  tax  benefit  of  ($250,000)
or (16.4%) of loss before income taxes in the fiscal 2000
period. These rates are higher than the statutory federal
tax  rate  due  to  the  effect  of  state  and  local  taxes  and
certain  nondeductible  expenses.  Nathan’s  has  agreed 
to  accept  an  offer  by  the  Internal  Revenue  Service  to 
conclude  the  Miami  Subs  tax  audit  for  the  years  1991
through 1996. As part of that agreement, Nathan’s expects
that  certain  amortization  of  intangible  assets  previously
deducted  by  Miami  Subs  will  be  reversed  and  will  not
be deductible in the future.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash  and  cash  equivalents  at  March  31,  2002  aggre-
gated  $1,834,000,  decreasing  by  $2,491,000  during  the
fiscal 2002 period. At March 31, 2002, marketable securi-
ties  and  investment  in  limited  partnership  increased  by
$4,171,000  from  March  25,  2001  to  $8,819,000  and  net
working capital increased to $9,565,000 from $5,210,000
at March 25, 2001.

Cash  used  in  operations  of  $3,081,000  in  the  fiscal
2002 period is primarily attributable to net income of
$1,249,000,  non-cash  charges  of  $4,195,000,  including
depreciation and amortization of $2,549,000, impairment
charges  of  $870,000,  deferred  taxes  of  $509,000  and 
provision for doubtful accounts of $267,000, in addition
to  a  decrease  in  other  assets  of  $104,000,  which  were
more than offset by decreases in accounts payable and
accrued  expenses  of  $2,538,000,  an  increase  in  mar-
ketable securities and investment in limited partnership
of  $4,171,000,  an  increase  in  prepaid  expenses  and
other current assets of $295,000, an increase in invento-
ries of $69,000 and a decrease in deferred franchise fees
of $324,000.

Cash provided by investing activities of $2,078,000 is
comprised  primarily  of  proceeds  from  the  sale  of  two
company-owned  restaurants  and  one  non-restaurant

Nathan’s Famous, Inc. & Subsidiaries

8

2002 Annual Report

property totaling $3,348,000. On May 1, 2001, pursuant
to an order of condemnation, we sold a company-
owned restaurant to the State of Florida for $1,475,000,
net  of  estimated  expenses  of  $25,000,  and  repaid  the
outstanding  mortgage  of  approximately  $793,000  plus
accrued interest. We successfully appealed the value of
the property that was condemned by the State of Florida
and were awarded an additional $850,000 in November
2001. On June 22, 2001, we also sold our restaurant in
the  Paramus  Park  Mall  to  a  franchisee  for  $400,000  in
cash  and  concurrently  entered  into  a  sublease  for  the
property.  On  January  17,  2002,  we  also  sold  a  non-
restaurant location for $575,000. Additionally, $2,082,000
was  expended  relating  to  capital  improvements  of  the
company-owned restaurants and other fixed asset addi-
tions  and  was  partially  offset  by  repayments  on  notes
receivable of $812,000.

Cash  used  in  financing  activities  of  $1,488,000  rep-
resents  repayments  of  notes  payable  and  obligations
under  capital  leases  in  the  amount  of  $1,353,000.  The
majority of the repayments arose from the repayment of
an  outstanding  mortgage  of  approximately  $793,000
plus accrued interest in connection with the condemna-
tion  of  a  company-owned  restaurant  by  the  State  of
Florida, as described above.

On  September  14,  2001,  Nathan’s  was  authorized  to 
purchase up to one million shares of its common stock.
Pursuant  to  our  stock  repurchase  program,  we  repur-
chased 41,691 shares of common stock in open market
transactions  at  a  total  cost  of  $135,000  as  of  March  31,
2002. On April 10, 2002, we repurchased 751,000 shares
of common stock in a private transaction at a total cost
of $2,741,500.

In connection with our acquisition of Miami Subs, we
determined that up to 18 underperforming restaurants
would  be  closed  pursuant  to  our  divestiture  plan.
Through March 31, 2002, we have terminated leases on
15 of those properties. We are continuing to market two
of the remaining properties for sale and terminated the
lease for the last unit upon the lease expiration in May
2002.  As  of  March  31,  2002,  we  have  accrued  approxi-
mately $1,461,000 and made payments of approximately
$1,273,000 for lease obligations and termination costs, as
part  of  the  acquisition,  for  units  with  total  future  mini-
mum  lease  obligations  of  $7,680,000  with  remaining
lease  terms  of  one  year  up  to  approximately  17  years.
We may incur future cash payments, consisting primarily
of future lease payments, including costs and expenses
associated  with  terminating  additional  leases,  that  were
not part of our divestiture plan.

We expect that we will make additional investments in
certain existing restaurants in the future and that we will
fund  those  investments  from  our  operating  cash  flow.
We  do  not  expect  to  incur  significant  capital  expendi-
tures  to  develop  new  company-owned  restaurants  dur-
ing our fiscal year ending March 30, 2003.

There are currently 34 properties that we either own
or lease from third parties which we lease or sublease to
franchisees  and  non-franchisees.  We  remain  contin-
gently  liable  for  all  costs  associated  with  these  proper-
ties. Additionally, we guaranteed financing on behalf of 

certain  franchisees  with  two  third-party  lenders.  Our
maximum obligation for loans funded by the lenders as
of March 31, 2002 was approximately $1.7 million.

Management  believes  that  available  cash,  marketable
investment  securities,  and  internally  generated  funds
should  provide  sufficient  capital  to  finance  our  opera-
tions for at least the next twelve months. We maintain a
$7,500,000  uncommitted  bank  line  of  credit  and  have
not borrowed any funds to date under this line of credit.

Seasonality

Our business is affected by seasonal fluctuations, the
effects of weather and economic conditions. Historically,
sales  and  earnings  have  been  highest  during  our  first
two  fiscal  quarters  with  the  fourth  fiscal  quarter  repre-
senting the slowest period. This seasonality is primarily
attributable to weather conditions in our marketplace for
our  company-owned  Nathan’s  stores,  which  is  prin-
cipally  the  New  York  metropolitan  area.  Miami  Subs’
restaurant  sales  have  historically  been  strongest  during
the  period  March  through  August,  which  approximates
our first and second quarters, as a result of a heavy con-
centration  of  restaurants  being  located  in  Florida.  As  a
result,  we  believe  that  future  revenues  may  become
slightly more seasonal.

Impact of Inflation

During  the  past  several  years,  our  commodity  costs
have remained relatively stable. As such, we believe that
inflation  has  not  materially  impacted  earnings  during
that period of time. Last year, we experienced increased
costs  of  our  meat  products  and  utilities  resulting  from
increased  commodity  costs.  We  also  experienced  in-
creased costs for insurance attributable to the hardening
of the insurance markets. This year, various Federal and
New  York  State  legislators  have  proposed  changes  to
the  existing  minimum  wage  requirements.  The  New
York State Assembly has voted to increase the minimum
wage  to  $6.75  an  hour  beginning  January  1,  2003  with
automatic  annual  increases,  commencing  January  2004,
based upon increases in the state’s average weekly pay.
Before  being  enacted,  this  proposal  must  be  approved
by  the  New  York  State  Senate  and  signed  by  the
Governor.  In  addition,  U.S.  Senator  Edward  Kennedy
has proposed increasing the Federal minimum wage to
$6.65  an  hour  which  would  be  fully  phased  in  by
January 1, 2004. If this proposal is passed this year, the
first increase of $0.60 an hour would take effect 60 days
later,  followed  by  a  $0.50  cent  an  hour  increase  on
January  1,  2003  and  another  $0.50  an  hour  increase 
on  January  1,  2004.  U.S.  Senate  Majority  Leader  Tom
Daschle has indicated that he wants to schedule a vote
on  this  matter  in  the  summer  of  2002.  We  believe  that
these increases in the minimum wage could have a sig-
nificant  financial  impact  on  our  financial  results.
Prolonged  increases  in  labor,  food  and  other  operating
expenses  could  adversely  affect  our  operations  and
those  of  the  restaurant  industry  and  we  might  have  to
reconsider  our  pricing  strategy  as  a  means  to  offset
reduced operating margins.

Nathan’s Famous, Inc. & Subsidiaries

9

2002 Annual Report

Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements

In  July  2001,  the  Financial  Accounting  Standards
Board  issued  Statements  of  Financial  Accounting
Standards No. 141, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No.
141”)  and  No.  142,  “Goodwill  and  Other  Intangible
Assets” (“SFAS No. 142”). SFAS No. 141 requires all busi-
ness  combinations  initiated  after  June  30,  2001  to  be
accounted  for  using  the  purchase  method.  Under  SFAS
No.  142,  goodwill  and  intangible  assets  with  indefinite
lives are no longer amortized but are reviewed annually
(or  more  frequently  if  impairment  indicators  arise)  for
impairment.  Separable  intangible  assets  that  are  not
deemed  to  have  indefinite  lives  will  continue  to  be
amortized over their useful lives (but with no maximum
life). The amortization provisions of SFAS No. 142 apply
to goodwill and intangible assets acquired after June 30,
2001.  There  are  also  transition  provisions  that  apply 
to  business  combinations  completed  before  July  1, 
2001, that were accounted for by the purchase method.
With  respect  to  its  goodwill  and  intangible  assets
acquired  prior  to  July  1,  2001,  Nathan’s  is  required  to
adopt SFAS No. 142 effective in its next fiscal year, com-
mencing April 1, 2002. Nathan’s will no longer amortize
existing  goodwill  and  certain  intangibles  having  indefi-
nite  lives,  thus  reducing  amortization  expense  by
approximately $600,000 per year. We expect to complete
our  impairment  analysis  during  the  first  quarter  fiscal
2003  and  expect  to  recognize  an  impairment  charge  of
approximately $12 to $13 million upon adoption of SFAS
No. 142.

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued  Statement  of  Financial  Accounting  Standards 
No.  143,  “Accounting  for  Asset  Retirement  Obligations”
(“SFAS  No.  143”).  SFAS  No.  143  addresses  financial  and 
reporting  obligations  associated  with  the  retirement  of
tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retire-
ment costs. It applies to legal obligations associated with
the retirement of long-lived assets that result from acqui-
sition,  construction,  development  and/or  the  normal
operation  of  a  long-lived  asset,  except  for  certain  obli-
gations of lessees. SFAS No. 143 is effective for financial
statements issued for fiscal years beginning after June 15,
2002. Nathan’s is currently evaluating the effect of adop-
tion on its financial position and results of operations.

In  August  2001,  the  Financial  Accounting  Standards
Board  issued  Statement  of  Financial  Accounting
Standards  No.  144,  “Accounting  for  the  Impairment  or
Disposal  of  Long-Lived  Assets”  (“SFAS  No.  144”).  SFAS
No.  144  supersedes  SFAS  No.  121,  “Accounting  for
the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived
Assets  to  Be  Disposed  Of”  and  Accounting  Principles
Board  Opinion  No.  30,  “Reporting  Results  of  Opera-
tions—Reporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of
a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual and Infrequently
Occurring Events and Transactions.” SFAS No. 144 retains
the fundamental provisions of SFAS No. 121 for recogni-
tion  and  measurement  of  impairment,  but  amends
the  accounting and reporting standards for segments of
a  business  to  be  disposed  of.  The  provisions  of  this
statement are required to be adopted no later than fiscal
years  beginning  after  December  31,  2001,  with  early
adoption  encouraged.  Nathan’s  is  currently  evaluating
the impact of the adoption of SFAS 144, which Nathan’s
does not expect to be material.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements contained in this report are forward-
looking statements. Forward-looking statements represent
our current judgment regarding future events. Although
we  would  not  make  forward-looking  statements  unless
we believe we have a reasonable basis for doing so, we
cannot  guarantee  their  accuracy  and  actual  results  may
differ  materially  from  those  we  anticipated  due  to  a
number  of  uncertainties,  many  of  which  we  are  not
aware. These risks and uncertainties, many of which are
not  within  our  control,  include,  but  are  not  limited  to:
the ongoing effects of the events of September 11, 2001;
economic,  weather,  legislative  and  business  conditions;
the  collectibility  of  receivables;  the  availability  of  suit-
able restaurant sites on reasonable rental terms; changes
in consumer tastes; the ability to continue to attract fran-
chisees;  the  ability  to  purchase  our  primary  food  and
paper products at reasonable prices; no material increases
in the minimum wage; and our ability to attract compe-
tent  restaurant  and  managerial  personnel.  We  generally
identify  forward-looking  statements  with  the  words
“believe,”  “intend,”  “plan,”  “expect,”  “anticipate,”  “esti-
mate,” “will,” “should” and similar expressions.

Nathan’s Famous, Inc. & Subsidiaries

10

2002 Annual Report

C O N S O L I D A T E D   B A L A N C E   S H E E T S
(in thousands, except share amounts)

ASSETS
Current Assets

Cash and cash equivalents
Marketable securities and investment in limited partnership
Notes and accounts receivable, net
Inventories
Assets available for sale
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Deferred income taxes

Total current assets

Notes receivable, net
Property and equipment, net
Assets available for sale
Intangible assets, net
Deferred income taxes
Other assets, net

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities

Current maturities of notes payable and capital lease obligations
Accounts payable
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
Deferred franchise fees

Total current liabilities

Notes payable and capital lease obligations, less current maturities
Other liabilities

Total liabilities

Commitments and Contingencies (Note N)
Stockholders’ Equity

Common stock, $.01 par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized; 7,065,202 and 

7,065,202 shares issued; and 7,023,511 and 7,065,202 shares outstanding at 
March 31, 2002 and March 25, 2001, respectively

Additional paid-in capital
Accumulated deficit

Treasury stock, 41,691 shares at cost

Total stockholders’ equity

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

March 31, March 25,

2002

2001

$ 1,834
8,819
2,808
592
1,512
1,269
1,747

18,581
2,277
8,925
—
17,123
1,539
300

$ 4,325
4,648
4,178
523
1,510
974
1,714

17,872
1,729
11,279
450
18,011
2,081
404

$48,745

$51,826

$

559
1,619
6,506
332

9,016
1,220
2,364

12,600

$ 1,343
1,978
8,685
656

12,662
1,789
2,344

16,795

71
40,746
(4,537)

36,280
(135)

36,145

71
40,746
(5,786)

35,031
—

35,031

$48,745

$51,826

Nathan’s Famous, Inc. & Subsidiaries

11

2002 Annual Report

C O N S O L I D A T E D   S TA T E M E N T S   O F   O P E R A T I O N S
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)

Revenues
Sales
Franchise fees and royalties
License royalties
Equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliate
Investment and other income

Total revenues

Costs and Expenses
Cost of sales
Restaurant operating expenses
Depreciation and amortization
Amortization of intangible assets
General and administrative expenses
Interest expense
Impairment charge on long-lived assets
Impairment charge on notes receivable
Other (income) expense, net

Total costs and expenses

Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes
Provision (benefit) for income taxes

Net income (loss)

Per Share Information

Net income (loss) per share

Basic

Diluted

Weighted average shares used in computing net income (loss) per share

Basic

Diluted

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

Fifty-Three 
Weeks Ended

Fifty-Two
Weeks Ended

March 31,
2002

March 25, March 26,

2001

2000

$32,349
7,944
2,038
—
2,068

44,399

21,643
7,788
1,661
888
9,292
256
685
185
(210)

42,188

2,211
962

$34,799
8,814
1,958
—
1,603

47,174

22,530
8,964
1,791
839
8,978
310
127
151
462

44,152

3,022
1,416

$29,642
5,906
1,906
(163)
600

37,891

18,977
8,208
1,358
716
8,222
198
465
840
427

39,411

(1,520)
(250)

$ 1,249

$ 1,606

$ (1,270)

$

$

.18

.18

$

$

.23

.23

$

$

(.22)

(.22)

7,048,000

7,059,000

5,881,000

7,083,000

7,098,000

5,881,000

Nathan’s Famous, Inc. & Subsidiaries

12

2002 Annual Report

C O N S O L I D A T E D   S TA T E M E N T   O F   S T O C K H O L D E R S ’   E Q U I T Y
(in thousands, except share amounts)

Fifty-Three Weeks Ended March 31, 2002 and 
Fifty-Two Weeks Ended March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000

Common Common

Shares

Stock

Additional
Paid-in
Capital

Accumulated
Deficit

Treasury Stock,
at Cost

Shares Amount

Total
Stockholders’
Equity

4,722,216

$ 47

$ 32,423

$ (6,122)

— $ —

$ 26,348

2,317,980

—

—
—

7,040,196
25,000
6
—

7,065,202
—
—

23

—

—
—

70
1
—
—

71
—
—

7,367

330

549
—

40,669
77
—
—

40,746
—
—

—

—

—
(1,270)

(7,392)
—
—
1,606

(5,786)
—
1,249

—

—

—
—

—
—
—
—

—

—

—
—

—
—
—
—

—
41,691
—

—
(135)
—

7,390

330

549
(1,270)

33,347
78
—
1,606

35,031
(135)
1,249

Balance, March 29, 1999
Common stock issued in 
connection with merger

Warrants issued in connection 

with merger

Options assumed in connection 

with merger

Net loss

Balance, March 26, 2000
Stock compensation
Warrants exercised
Net income

Balance, March 25, 2001
Repurchase of treasury stock
Net income

Balance, March 31, 2002

7,065,202

$71

$40,746

$(4,537)

41,691 $(135)

$36,145

The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statement.

Nathan’s Famous, Inc. & Subsidiaries

13

2002 Annual Report

C O N S O L I D A T E D   S TA T E M E N T S   O F   C A S H   F L O W S
(in thousands)

Cash Flows From Operating Activities:

Net income (loss)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash (used in) 

provided by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization
Amortization of intangible assets
(Gain) loss on disposal of fixed assets
Stock compensation expense
Impairment of long-lived assets
Impairment of notes receivable
Provision for doubtful accounts
Equity in losses of unconsolidated affiliate
Deferred income taxes

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of effects from 

acquisition of Miami Subs

Marketable securities and investment in limited partnership
Notes and accounts receivable
Inventories
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
Other assets
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities
Deferred franchise fees
Other liabilities

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities

Cash Flows From Investing Activities:

Cash acquired in connection with merger, net of transaction costs
Lease terminations and other costs in connection with acquisition
Purchases of property and equipment
Purchase of intellectual property
Payments received on notes receivable
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Principal repayments of borrowing
Repurchase of treasury stock

Net cash used in financing activities

Net change in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of year

Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of year

Cash Paid During the Year for:

Interest

Income taxes

Fifty-Three 
Weeks Ended

Fifty-Two
Weeks Ended

March 31,
2002

March 25, March 26,

2001

2000

$ 1,249

$ 1,606

$(1,270)

1,791
839
—
78
127
151
191
—
313

(1,651)
(1,350)
20
(339)
159
961
(76)
1,329

4,149

—
(1,036)
(1,458)
—
506
45

(1,943)

(278)
—

(278)

$ 1,928
2,397

$ 4,325

$

317

$ 1,508

1,358
716
123
—
465
840
895
163
(958)

270
(504)
3
(187)
182
(158)
721
(682)

1,977

3,429
—
(1,975)
(1,590)
320
—

184

(1,929)
—

(1,929)

$

232
2,165

$ 2,397

$

$

207

831

1,661
888
(1,226)
—
685
185
267
—
509

(4,171)
(26)
(69)
(295)
104
(2,538)
(324)
20

(3,081)

—
—
(2,082)
—
812
3,348

2,078

(1,353)
(135)

(1,488)

$(2,491)
4,325

$ 1,834

264

149

$

$

$

Noncash Financing Activities:

Loan to franchisee in connection with sale of restaurant

Common stock, warrants and options issued in connection 

with acquisition

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

Nathan’s Famous, Inc. & Subsidiaries

14

2002 Annual Report

416

$

130

$ —

$ —

$ —

$ 8,269

N O T E S   T O   C O N S O L I D A T E D   F I N A N C I A L   S TA T E M E N T S
(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000

Note A — Description and Organization of Business

1. Description of Business

Nathan’s  Famous,  Inc.  and  subsidiaries  (collectively
the “Company” or “Nathan’s”) has historically operated,
in  one  business  segment,  a  chain  of  retail  fast  food
restaurants  featuring  Nathan’s  famous  brand  of  all-beef
frankfurters, fresh crinkle-cut french fried potatoes and a
variety  of  other  menu  offerings.  Since  fiscal  1998,  the
Company has supplemented Nathan’s franchise program
with  the  Nathan’s  Branded  Product  Program,  which
enables  foodservice  retailers  to  sell  some  of  Nathan’s
proprietary products outside of the realm of a traditional
franchise relationship. During fiscal 2000, the Company
acquired the intellectual property rights, including trade-
marks,  recipes  and  franchise  agreements  of  Roasters
Corp. and Roasters Franchise Corp. (“Roasters”), the fran-
chisor  of  Kenny  Rogers  Roasters.  In  addition,  Nathan’s
completed  a  merger  with  Miami  Subs  Corporation
(“Miami  Subs”)  whereby  it  acquired  the  remaining  70%
of Miami Subs common stock not already owned. Miami
Subs features a wide variety of lunch, dinner and snack
foods,  including  hot  and  cold  sandwiches  and  various
ethnic  foods.  Roasters  features  home-style  family  foods
based  on  a  menu  centered  around  wood-fire  rotisserie
chicken.

At March 31, 2002, the Company’s restaurant system,
consisting  of  Nathan’s  Famous,  Kenny  Rogers  Roasters
and Miami Subs restaurants, included 22 company-
owned units concentrated in the New York metropolitan
area (including New Jersey) and Florida, 364 franchised
or licensed units, including three units operating pursuant 
to  management  agreements  and  approximately  1,500
branded  product  points  of  sale  under  the  Nathan’s
Branded  Product  Program,  located  in  39  states,  the
District of Columbia, and 14 foreign countries.

2. Organization of Business

In July 1987, all of the outstanding shares, options and
warrants  of  Nathan’s  Famous,  Inc.  (the  “Predecessor
Company”), a then publicly-held New York corporation,
were acquired through a cash transaction, accounted for
by  the  purchase  method  of  accounting  (the  “Acquisi-
tion”).  In  connection  with  the  Acquisition,  a  privately-
held New York corporation (the “Acquiring Corporation”)
was  merged  into  the  Predecessor  Company.  The  pur-
chase  price  exceeded  the  fair  value  of  the  acquired
assets  of  the  Predecessor  Company  by  $15,374,  and
such  amount  is  recorded  net  of  accumulated  amortiza-
tion in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

In  November  1989,  the  surviving  corporation  was
merged with Nathan’s Newco, Inc., a Delaware corpora-
tion  which,  upon  the  effectiveness  of  the  merger,
changed its name to Nathan’s Famous, Inc. (“NFI”).

In  August  1992,  Nathan’s  Famous  Holding  Corp.
(“NFH”),  a  new  Delaware  corporation  was  formed.

Pursuant to a merger agreement, NFI became a wholly-
owned subsidiary of NFH. On December 15, 1992, NFI
and NFH amended their charter to change their respec-
tive  names  to  Nathan’s  Famous  Operating  Corp.
(“NFOC”) and Nathan’s Famous, Inc.

Note B — Summary of Significant 

Accounting Policies

1. Principles of Consolidation

The  consolidated  financial  statements  include  the
accounts of the Company and all its wholly-owned sub-
sidiaries.  All  intercompany  balances  and  transactions
have been eliminated in consolidation.

2. Fiscal Year

The Company’s fiscal year ends on the last Sunday in
March,  which  results  in  a  52-  or  53-week  reporting
period.  The  results  of  operations  for  the  fiscal  year
ended  March  31,  2002  is  on  the  basis  of  a  53-week
reporting period. The results of operations for the fiscal
years ended March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 are on
the basis of a 52-week reporting period.

3. Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity
with  accounting  principles  generally  accepted  in  the
United States of America requires management to make
estimates  and  assumptions  that  affect  the  reported
amounts  of  assets  and  liabilities  and  disclosure  of  con-
tingent  assets  and  liabilities  at  the  date  of  the  financial
statements  and  the  reported  amounts  of  revenues  and
expenses  during  the  reporting  period.  Actual  results
could differ from those estimates.

4. Cash and Cash Equivalents

The  Company  considers  all  highly  liquid  instruments
purchased with an original maturity of three months or
less  to  be  cash  equivalents.  Cash  restricted  for  unten-
dered  shares  associated  with  the  Acquisition  amounted
to  $83  at  March  31,  2002  and  March  25,  2001,  respec-
tively, and is included in cash and cash equivalents. At
March  31,  2002  and  March  25,  2001,  cash  and  cash
equivalents included unexpended Miami Subs’ advertis-
ing funds of $0 and $2,104, respectively.

5. Impairment of Notes Receivable

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards  No.  114  (“SFAS  No.  114”),  “Accounting  by
Creditors  for  Impairment  of  a  Loan,”  Nathan’s  applies
the  provisions  thereof  to  value  notes  receivable.
Pursuant  to  SFAS  No.  114,  a  loan  is  impaired  when,
based on current information and events, it is probable
that a creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due
according  to  the  contractual  terms  of  the  loan  agree-
ment.  When  evaluating  a  note  for  impairment,  the  fac-
tors considered include: 1) indications that the borrower

Nathan’s Famous, Inc. & Subsidiaries

15

2002 Annual Report

is  experiencing  business  problems  such  as  operating
losses,  marginal  working  capital,  inadequate  cash  flow
or business interruptions; 2) loans secured by collateral
that is not readily marketable; or 3) that are susceptible
to  deterioration  in  realizable  value.  When  determining
impairment,  management’s  assessment  includes  its
intention to extend certain leases beyond the minimum
lease term and the note holder’s ability to meet its obli-
gation  over  that  extended  term.  In  certain  cases  where
Nathan’s has determined that a loan has been impaired,
it  does  not  expect  to  extend  or  renew  the  underlying
leases.  Based  on  the  Company’s  analysis,  it  has  deter-
mined  that  there  are  notes  that  have  incurred  such  an
impairment  (Note  E).  Following  is  a  summary  of  the
impaired notes receivable:

Total recorded investment in 
impaired notes receivable

Allowance for impaired 

notes receivable

March 31, March 25,

2002

2001

$1,000

$1,105

(640)

(613)

Recorded investment in impaired 

notes receivable, net

$ 360

$ 492

Based on the present value of the estimated cash flows
of  identified  impaired  note  receivables,  the  Company
has  recognized  approximately  $47  and  $63  of  interest
income on these notes for the fiscal years ended March
31, 2002 and March 25, 2001, respectively.

6. Inventories

Inventories,  which  are  stated  at  the  lower  of  cost  or
market value, consist primarily of restaurant food items,
supplies, marketing items and equipment in connection
with  the  Branded  Product  Program.  Cost  is  determined
using the first-in, first-out method.

7. Marketable Securities and Investment in 

Limited Partnership
In  accordance  with  SFAS  No.  115,  “Accounting  for
Certain  Investments  in  Debt  and  Equity  Securities,”  the
Company  determines  the  appropriate  classification  of
securities  at  the  time  of  purchase  and  reassesses  the
appropriateness  of  the  classification  at  each  reporting
date.  At  March  31,  2002,  all  marketable  securities  and
investment in limited partnership held by the Company
have  been  classified  as  trading  and,  as  a  result,  are
stated at fair value. Realized gains and losses on the sale
of  securities,  as  determined  on  a  specific  identification
basis, as well as unrealized holding gains and losses on
trading securities are included in the accompanying con-
solidated  statements  of  operations.  Investment  income
in the trading limited partnership is based upon Nathan’s
proportionate share of the change in the underlying net
assets  of  the  partnership.  The  partnership  invests  pri-
marily in publicly traded common stocks with a concen-
tration  in  securities  traded  on  exchanges  in  the  United
States of America.

8. Sales of Restaurants

The Company observes the provisions of SFAS No. 66,
“Accounting for Sales of Real Estate,” which establishes
accounting  standards  for  recognizing  profit  or  loss  on
sales of real estate. SFAS No. 66 provides for profit
recognition by the full accrual method, provided (a) the
profit  is  determinable,  that  is,  the  collectibility  of  the
sales price is reasonably assured or the amount that will
not be collectible can be estimated, and (b) the earnings
process  is  virtually  complete,  that  is,  the  seller  is  not
obliged to perform significant activities after the sale to
earn the profit. Unless both conditions exist, recognition
of all or part of the profit shall be postponed and other
methods  of  profit  recognition  shall  be  followed.  In
accordance with SFAS No. 66, the Company recognizes
profit on sales of restaurants under both the installment
method and the deposit method, depending on the spe-
cific  terms  of  each  sale.  The  Company  continues  to
record depreciation expense on the property subject to
the  sales  contracts  that  are  accounted  for  under  the
deposit  method  and  records  any  principal  payments
received as a deposit until such time that the transaction
meets the sales criteria of SFAS No. 66.

As  of  March  31,  2002  and  March  25,  2001,  the  Com-
pany  had  deposits  of  $214  and  $332,  respectively,
included in accrued expenses in the accompanying con-
solidated balance sheets.

During the fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, the
Company  sold  two  company-owned  restaurants  and  a
nonrestaurant property for total proceeds of $3,348. The
Company  recognized  a  gain  of  $1,226  in  connection
with these sales.

9. Property and Equipment

Property  and  equipment  are  stated  at  cost  less  accu-
mulated  depreciation  and  amortization.  Depreciation
and amortization are calculated primarily on the straight-
line  basis  over  the  estimated  useful  lives  of  the  assets.
Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter
of  the  estimated  useful  life  or  the  lease  term  of  the
related asset. The estimated useful lives are as follows:
Building and improvements
Machinery, equipment, furniture and fixtures
Leasehold improvements

5–25 years
5–15 years
5–20 years

10. Intangible Assets

Intangible  assets  consist  of  (i)  the  goodwill  resulting
from  the  Acquisition;  (ii)  trademarks  and  trade  names,
franchise rights and recipes in connection with Roasters;
and  (iii)  goodwill  and  certain  identifiable  intangibles
resulting  from  the  Miami  Subs  acquisition  (Note  C).
These intangible assets are being amortized over periods
from 10 to 40 years.

11. Long-Lived Assets

Long-lived  assets  and  intangible  assets  are  reviewed 
for  impairment  whenever  events  or  changes  in  circum-
stances indicate the carrying value may not be recover-
able. Impairment is measured by comparing the carrying 

Nathan’s Famous, Inc. & Subsidiaries

16

2002 Annual Report

value  of  the  long-lived  assets  to  the  estimated  undis-
counted future cash flows expected to result from use of
the  assets  and  their  ultimate  disposition.  In  instances
where impairment is determined to exist, the Company
writes down the asset to its fair value based on the pres-
ent value of estimated future cash flows.

Impairment  losses  are  recorded  on  long-lived  assets
on  a  restaurant-by-restaurant  basis  whenever  impair-
ment  factors  are  determined  to  be  present.  The
Company  considers  a  history  of  restaurant  operating
losses to be its primary indicator of potential impairment
for  individual  restaurant  locations.  The  Company  has
identified  two,  one  and  three  units  that  have  been
impaired,  and  recorded  impairment  charges  of  $685,
$127  and  $465  in  the  statements  of  operations  for  the
fiscal years ended March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and
March 26, 2000, respectively.

The  Company  periodically  reviews  intangible  assets
for impairment, whenever events or changes in circum-
stances  indicate  that  the  carrying  amounts  of  those
assets  may  not  be  recoverable.  No  impairment  charges
have  been  recorded  with  respect  to  such  intangible
assets for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002, March
25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 (Note B-22).

12. Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate

The  Company  accounted  for  its  initial  investment  in
Miami Subs under the equity method of accounting until
the completion of the merger. Accordingly, the carrying
value  of  the  investment,  prior  to  the  acquisition,  was
equal to the Company’s initial cash investment in Miami
Subs,  plus  its  share  of  the  loss  of  Miami  Subs  through
September 30, 1999.

13. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The  carrying  amounts  of  cash  and  cash  equivalents,
marketable securities and investment in limited partner-
ship, accounts receivable and accounts payable approx-
imate  fair  value  due  to  the  short-term  maturities  of  the
instruments. The carrying amounts of note payable and
capital  lease  obligations  and  notes  receivable  approxi-
mate their fair values.

14. Stock-Based Compensation

The Company complies with the disclosure-only pro-
visions  of  SFAS  No.  123,  “Accounting  for  Stock-Based
Compensation.”  This  statement  establishes  financial
accounting  and  reporting  standards  for  stock-based
employee  compensation  plans.  The  provisions  of  SFAS
No.  123  encourage  entities  to  adopt  a  fair  value-based
method  of  accounting  for  stock  compensation  plans;
however,  these  provisions  also  permit  the  Company  to 
continue  to  measure  compensation  costs  under  pre-
existing  accounting  pronouncements.  Pursuant  to  SFAS
No.  123,  the  Company  has  elected  to  continue  the
accounting  set  forth  in  Accounting  Principles  Board
(“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees,”  and  to  provide  the  necessary  pro  forma
disclosures.

15. Start-up Costs

Preopening and similar costs are expensed as incurred.

16. Revenue Recognition—Company-owned Restaurants
Sales  by  Company-owned  restaurants  are  recognized

on a cash basis, upon the performance of services.

17. Revenue Recognition—Franchising Operations

In  connection  with  its  franchising  operations,  the
Company  receives  initial  franchise  fees,  development
fees, royalties, contributions to marketing funds, and in
certain cases, revenue from sub-leasing restaurant prop-
erties to franchisees. Initial franchise fees are recognized
as income when substantially all services and conditions
relating  to  the  sale  of  the  franchise  have  been  per-
formed  or  satisfied,  which  generally  occurs  when  the 
franchised  restaurant  commences  operations.  Develop-
ment fees are nonrefundable and the related agreements 
require  the  franchisee  to  open  a  specified  number  of
restaurants  in  the  development  area  within  a  specified
time period or the agreements may be canceled by the
Company.  Revenue  from  development  agreements  is
deferred  and  recognized  as  restaurants  in  the  develop-
ment area commence operations on a pro rata basis to
the  minimum  number  of  restaurants  required  to  be
open, or at the time the development agreement is
effectively canceled. Royalties, which are based upon a
percentage  of  the  franchisee’s  gross  sales,  are  recog-
nized as income when the fees are earned and become
receivable  and  deemed  collectible.  Revenue  from 
sub-leasing  properties  to  franchisees  is  recognized  as
income  as  the  revenue  is  earned  and  becomes  receiv-
able  and  deemed  collectible.  Sublease  rental  income  is
presented  net  of  associated  lease  costs  in  the  accom-
panying  consolidated  financial  statements.  Franchise 
and area development fees received prior to completion
of  the  revenue  recognition  process  are  recorded  as
deferred revenue.

At March 31, 2002 and March 25, 2001, $332 and $656,
respectively,  of  deferred  franchise  fees  are  included  in
the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

18. Concentrations of Credit Risk

The  Company’s  accounts  receivable  consist  princi-
pally  of  receivables  from  franchisees  for  royalties  and
advertising contributions and from sales under the
Branded Product Program. At March 31, 2002, one fran-
chisee represented 13% of franchise royalties receivable
and at March 25, 2001, one franchisee represented 10%
of franchise royalties receivable (Note E).

19. Advertising

The  Company  administers  various  advertising  funds
on  behalf  of  its  subsidiaries  and  franchisees  to  coor-
dinate  the  marketing  efforts  of  the  Company.  Under
these arrangements, the Company collects and disburses
fees  paid  by  franchisees  and  Company-owned  stores 
for  national  and  regional  advertising,  promotional  and
public  relations  programs.  Contributions  are  based  on
specified percentages of net sales, generally ranging up
to  3%.  Advertising  contributions  from  Company-owned

Nathan’s Famous, Inc. & Subsidiaries

17

2002 Annual Report

stores  are  included  in  restaurant  operating  expenses  in
the  accompanying  consolidated  statements  of  opera-
tions.  Net  Company-owned  store  advertising  expense
was $940, $1,602 and $888, for the fiscal years ended
March  31,  2002,  March  25,  2001  and  March  26,  2000,
respectively.

20. Income Taxes

Deferred  tax  assets  and  liabilities  are  recognized  for
the  future  tax  consequences  attributable  to  differences
between  the  financial  statement  carrying  amounts  of
existing  assets  and  liabilities  and  their  respective  tax
bases  and  operating  loss  and  tax  credit  carryforwards.
Deferred  tax  assets  and  liabilities  are  measured  using
enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in
the  year  in  which  those  temporary  differences  are
expected to be recovered or settled.

21. Reclassifications

Certain  prior  year  balances  have  been  reclassified  to

conform with current year presentation.

22. Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In July 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued  SFAS  No.  141,  “Business  Combinations”  (“SFAS
No.  141”)  and  SFAS  No.  142,  “Goodwill  and  Other
Intangible  Assets”  (“SFAS  No.  142”).  SFAS  No.  141
requires all business combinations initiated after June 30,
2001  to  be  accounted  for  using  the  purchase  method.
Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill and intangible assets with
indefinite  lives  are  no  longer  amortized  but  are
reviewed  annually  (or  more  frequently  if  impairment
indicators  arise)  for  impairment.  Separable  intangible
assets  that  are  not  deemed  to  have  indefinite  lives  will
continue  to  be  amortized  over  their  useful  lives  (but
with  no  maximum  life).  The  amortization  provisions  of
SFAS  No.  142  apply  to  goodwill  and  intangible  assets
acquired  after  June  30,  2001.  With  respect  to  goodwill
and  intangible  assets  acquired  prior  to  July  1,  2001,
Nathan’s is required to adopt SFAS No. 142 effective in
its next fiscal year, commencing April 1, 2002.

The Company will no longer amortize existing good-
will and certain intangible assets having indefinite lives,
thereby  reducing  amortization  expense  by  approxi-
mately  $600  per  year.  The  Company  expects  to  com-
plete  its  impairment  analysis  during  the  first  quarter  of
fiscal  2003  and  expects  to  recognize  an  impairment 
charge of approximately $12.0 to $13.0 million upon the
adoption of SFAS No. 142.

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued  SFAS  No.  143,  “Accounting  for  Asset  Retirement
Obligations”  (“SFAS  No.  143”).  SFAS  No.  143  addresses
financial  and  reporting  obligations  associated  with  the
retirement  of  tangible  long-lived  assets  and  the  associ-
ated asset retirement costs. It applies to legal obligations
associated  with  the  retirement  of  long-lived  assets  that
result  from  acquisition,  construction,  development
and/or  the  normal  operation  of  a  long-lived  asset, 
except for certain obligations of lessees. SFAS No. 143 is
effective  for  financial  statements  issued  for  fiscal  years 

beginning after June 15, 2002. Nathan’s is currently eval-
uating  the  effect  of  adoption  on  its  financial  position
and results of operations.

In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board  issued  SFAS  No.  144,  “Accounting  for  the
Impairment  or  Disposal  of  Long-Lived  Assets”  (“SFAS
No. 144”). SFAS No. 144 supersedes SFAS No. 121,
“Accounting  for  the  Impairment  of  Long-Lived  Assets
and  for  Long-Lived  Assets  to  Be  Disposed  Of”  and
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30, “Reporting
Results of Operations—Reporting the Effects of Disposal
of a Segment of a Business, and Extraordinary, Unusual
and  Infrequently  Occurring  Events  and  Transactions.”
This  statement  retains  the  fundamental  provisions  of
SFAS  No.  121  for  recognition  and  measurement  of
impairment,  but  amends  the  accounting  and  reporting
standards for segments of a business to be disposed of.
The  provisions  of  SFAS  No.  144  are  required  to  be
adopted  no  later  than  fiscal  years  beginning  after
December  31,  2001,  with  early  adoption  encouraged.
The  Company  is  currently  evaluating  the  impact  of  the
adoption of SFAS No. 144, which the Company expects
will not be material.

Note C — Acquisitions

On February 19, 1999, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for
the Middle District of North Carolina, Durham Division,
confirmed  the  Joint  Plan  of  Reorganization  of  the
Official Committee of Franchisees of Roasters Corp. and
Roasters  Franchise  Corp.,  operators  of  Kenny  Rogers
Roasters  Restaurants.  Under  the  Joint  Plan  of  Reorgan-
ization, on April 1, 1999, Nathan’s acquired the intellec-
tual  property  rights,  including  trademarks,  recipes  and
franchise  agreements,  of  Roasters  Corp.  and  Roasters
Franchise Corp. for $1,250 in cash plus related expenses
of  approximately  $340.  NF  Roasters  Corp.,  a  wholly-
owned  subsidiary,  was  created  for  the  purpose  of
acquiring these assets. The acquired assets are recorded
as  intangibles  in  the  accompanying  consolidated  bal-
ance  sheet  and  are  being  amortized  on  a  straight-line
basis  over  periods  of  10  to  20  years.  No  company-
owned  restaurants  were  acquired  in  this  transaction.
Results of operations are included in these consolidated
financial statements as of April 1, 1999.

On  November  25,  1998,  the  Company  acquired
8,121,000  (2,030,250  after  giving  effect  to  a  4-for-1
reverse  stock  split)  shares,  or  approximately  30%  of 
the  then  outstanding  common  stock,  of  Miami  Subs
Corporation  for  $4,200,  excluding  transaction  costs.  On 
January 15, 1999, the Company and Miami Subs entered
into  a  definitive  merger  agreement  pursuant  to  which 
Nathan’s  would  acquire  the  remaining  outstanding
shares  of  Miami  Subs  in  exchange  for  shares  of  and 
warrants to purchase Nathan’s common stock.

On  September  30,  1999,  Nathan’s  completed  the
acquisition  of  Miami  Subs  and  acquired  the  remaining
outstanding  common  stock  of  Miami  Subs  in  exchange
for 2,317,980 shares of Nathan’s common stock, 579,040
warrants  to  purchase  Nathan’s  common  stock,  and  the
assumption  of  existing  employee  options  and  warrants

Nathan’s Famous, Inc. & Subsidiaries

18

2002 Annual Report

to  purchase  542,284  shares  of  Miami  Subs’  common
stock in connection with the merger. The total purchase
price  was  approximately  $13,000,  including  acquisition
costs. The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase
under  APB  Opinion  No.  16,  “Accounting  for  Business
Combinations” (“APB No. 16”). In accordance with APB
No.  16,  the  Company  allocated  the  purchase  price  of
Miami  Subs  based  on  the  fair  value  of  the  assets
acquired  and  liabilities  assumed.  Goodwill  of  $1,668
resulted from the acquisition of Miami Subs and is being
amortized over a period of 20 years.

In  connection  with  the  acquisition  of  Miami  Subs,
Nathan’s  planned  to  permanently  close  18  under-
performing  company-owned  restaurants.  Nathan’s
expected  to  abandon  or  sell  the  related  assets  at
amounts below the historical carrying amounts recorded
by  Miami  Subs.  In  accordance  with  APB  No.  16,  the
write-down  of  these  assets  was  reflected  as  part  of  the
purchase  price  allocation.  To  date  the  Company  has
closed or sold 15 units. The Company continues to mar-
ket two of these properties for sale and will cease oper-
ations of the remaining unit upon lease expiration. The
estimated  disposal  value  is  included  in  assets  held  for
sale in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet for
the remaining units to be sold. As of March 31, 2002, as
part  of  the  acquisition,  the  Company  has  recorded
approximately $1,461 ($877 after tax) for lease reserves
and termination costs.

The allocation of purchase price is as follows:

Current assets
Property and equipment
Assets held for sale
Intangibles
Goodwill
Notes receivable—long-term
Other assets
Liabilities assumed

$ 5,481
7,060
653
5,441
1,668
3,860
2,212
(13,364)

$ 13,011

The consolidated results of operations for Miami Subs
are included in the consolidated financial statements as
of  the  date  of  acquisition.  Summarized  below  are  the
unaudited  pro  forma  results  of  operations  for  the  fifty-
two weeks ended March 26, 2000 of Nathan’s as though

the  Miami  Subs  acquisition  had  occurred  as  of  the
beginning  of  the  periods  presented.  Adjustments  have
been  made  for  amortization  of  goodwill  based  upon
salary  expense  based  on  employment  agreements,
reversal  of  Miami  Subs’  merger  costs,  elimination  of
Nathan’s 30% equity earnings in Miami Subs, issuance of 
common  stock,  and  reduction  of  interest  income  on
marketable  securities  used  to  purchase  the  initial  30% 
of Miami Subs’ common stock.

Total revenues

Net loss

Net loss per share:

Basic

Diluted

Weighted average shares used in 
computing net loss per share:

Basic

Diluted

Fifty-Two
Weeks Ended

March 26, 2000

$50,455

$(1,466)

$

$

(.21)

(.21)

7,040,000

7,040,000

These pro forma results of operations have been pre-
pared for comparative purposes only and are not neces-
sarily  indicative  of  actual  results  of  operations  that
would have occurred had the acquisition been made at
the beginning of the period presented or of the results
which may occur in the future.

Note D — Net Income (Loss) Per Share

Basic  earnings  per  common  share  is  calculated  by
dividing  net  income  (loss)  by  the  weighted  average
number  of  common  shares  outstanding  and  excludes
any dilutive effects of stock options or warrants. Diluted
earnings per common share gives effect to all potentially
dilutive  common  shares  that  were  outstanding  during
the period. Dilutive common shares used in the compu-
tation of diluted earnings per common share result from
the  assumed  exercise  of  stock  options  and  warrants,
using the treasury stock method.

The  following  chart  provides  a  reconciliation  of  information  used  in  calculating  the  per  share  amounts  for  the 

fiscal years ended March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000, respectively:

Net Income (Loss)

2002

2001

2000(1)

2002

Shares

2001

Net Income (Loss)
Per Share

2000(1)

2002

2001

2000(1)

$1,249

$1,606

$(1,270) 7,048,000

7,059,000

5,881,000

$.18

$.23

$(.22)

Basic EPS

Basic calculation
Effect of dilutive employee 

stock options and warrants

—

—

—

35,000

39,000

—

—

—

—

Diluted EPS

Diluted calculation

$1,249

$1,606

$(1,270) 7,083,000

7,098,000

5,881,000

$.18

$.23

$(.22)

(1) Common stock equivalents have been excluded from the computation for net income (loss) per share for the fiscal year end March 26, 2000 as

their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

Nathan’s Famous, Inc. & Subsidiaries

19

2002 Annual Report

Note E — Notes and Accounts Receivable, Net

Notes and accounts receivable, net, consists of the 

following:

Notes receivable, net of 
impairment charges

Franchise and license royalties
Branded product sales
Other

Less: allowance for 
doubtful accounts

Notes receivable due after one year

March 31, March 25,

2002

2001

$2,662
1,376
785
906

5,729

644
2,277

$2,874
2,499
730
684

6,787

880
1,729

Notes and accounts receivable, net

$2,808

$4,178

Notes receivable at March 31, 2002 and March 25, 2001
principally  resulted  from  sales  of  restaurant  businesses
to Miami Subs franchisees and are generally guaranteed
by  the  purchaser  and  collateralized  by  the  restaurant
businesses and assets sold. The notes are generally due
in monthly installments of principal and interest with a
balloon  payment  at  the  end  of  the  term,  with  interest
rates ranging principally between 5% and 10%.

Note F — Marketable Securities and Investment in

Limited Partnership

Marketable securities at March 31, 2002 and March 25,
2001  consisted  of  trading  securities  with  aggregate  fair
values of $8,819 and $4,648, respectively. Fair values of
corporate and municipal bonds are based upon quoted
market  prices.  Investment  income  in  trading  limited
partnerships  is  based  on  the  Company’s  proportionate
share of the change in the underlying net assets of the
partnership.

The gross unrealized holding gains and fair values of trading securities by major security type for the fiscal years

ended March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 were as follows:

Municipal bonds
Investment in trading 
limited partnerships*

2002

2001

2000

Gross
Unrealized
Holding
Gain (Loss)

Fair
Value of

Gross
Unrealized
Holding

Fair
Value of

Gross
Unrealized
Holding

Investments Gain (Loss)

Investments Gain (Loss)

Fair
Value of
Investments

$(20)

(2)

$(22)

$7,801

$ 16

1,018

$8,819

(438)

$(422)

$3,628

1,020

$4,648

$

3

420

$423

$1,540

1,457

$2,997

*Subject to the terms of the partnership, the Company has the right to liquidate its investment in the trading limited partnerships without penalty.

Note G — Property and Equipment, net

Property and equipment consist of the following:

Construction-in-progress
Land
Building and improvements
Machinery, equipment, 
furniture and fixtures
Leasehold improvements

Less: accumulated depreciation 

and amortization

March 31, March 25,

2002

$

842
1,665
2,245

6,602
7,201

2001

$

141
1,983
3,083

7,202
7,949

18,555

20,358

9,630

9,079

$ 8,925

$11,279

Depreciation  expense  on  property  and  equipment
was $1,661, $1,791 and $1,358 for the fiscal years ended
March  31,  2002,  March  25,  2001  and  March  26,  2000,
respectively.

In  May  2001,  the  Company  completed  the  sale  of  a
restaurant  property  for  approximately  $1.5  million  pur-
suant to an order of condemnation by the State of
Florida.  The  fair  value  of  the  assets  (which  approxi-
mated the carrying value) is included in the current por-
tion of assets available for sale at March 25, 2001 in the
accompanying  consolidated  balance  sheet.  Concurrent
with  the  sale,  the  Company  satisfied  the  related  note
payable  of  approximately  $793  plus  accrued  interest,
and accordingly, had classified the remaining balance at
March 25, 2001 as current in the accompanying consoli-
dated  balance  sheet.  The  Company  appealed  the  value
of  this  property  and  on  November  19,  2001,  an  Order
was  entered  by  the  Circuit  Court  of  the  11th  Judicial
Circuit  of  Florida  in  and  for  Miami-Dade  County  pur-
suant  to  which  the  State  of  Florida  Department  of
Transportation  was  ordered  to  pay  to  the  Company  an
aggregate value of $2,350, plus legal fees in the amount
of  $253  in  connection  with  the  condemnation  by  the 
State  of  Florida  of  the  restaurant.  The  additional  pro-
ceeds received by the Company of approximately $850
is  recorded  in  “investment  and  other  income”  in  the
accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

Nathan’s Famous, Inc. & Subsidiaries

20

2002 Annual Report

Note H — Intangible Assets, net

Intangible assets consist of the following:

Goodwill
Trademark, trade name, franchise 

rights and recipes

Less accumulated amortization

March 31, March 25,

2002

2001

$17,043

$17,043

7,031

24,074
6,951

7,031

24,074
6,063

Intangible assets, net

$17,123

$18,011

Amortization expense related to these intangible assets
was  $888,  $839  and  $716  for  the  fiscal  years  ended
March  31,  2002,  March  25,  2001  and  March  26,  2000,
respectively.

Note I — Accrued Expenses and 

Other Current Liabilities

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist

of the following:

Payroll and other benefits
Professional and legal costs
Self-insured retention
Rent, occupancy and 

sublease termination costs

Taxes payable
Unexpended advertising funds
Other

March 31, March 25,

2002

$ 1,455
407
1,346

831
595
—
1,872

2001

$ 1,365
898
825

1,236
512
2,104
1,745

$ 6,506

$ 8,685

Note J — Notes Payable and Capitalized 

Lease Obligations

A  summary  of  notes  payable  and  capitalized  lease

obligations is as follows:

March 31, March 25,

2002

2001

Note payable to bank at 8.5% 
through January 2003 and 
adjusting to prime plus 0.25% 
in 2003, 2006 and 2009 and 
maturity in 2010

Note payable to bank at 8.0% 

through January 2002

Note payable to bank at 1.5% over 

prime and maturing in 2001

Note payable to bank at 8.75% and 

maturing in 2003

Capital lease obligations and other

$ 1,333

$ 1,505

—

—

381
65

806

354

397
70

In  August  2001,  Miami  Subs  entered  into  an  agree-
ment with a franchisee and a bank, which called for the
assumption of a note payable by the franchisee and the 
repayment of an existing note receivable from the fran-
chisee.  The  Company  guarantees  the  franchisee’s  note
payable with the bank. The Company’s maximum obli-
gation  for  loans  funded  by  the  lender,  as  of  March  31,
2002, was approximately $333.

At March 31, 2002, the aggregate annual maturities of
notes  payable  and  capitalized  lease  obligations  are  as
follows:
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Thereafter

$ 559
173
173
174
174
526

$1,779

The Company maintains a $7,500 line of credit with its
primary  banking  institution.  Borrowings  under  the  line
of  credit  are  intended  to  be  used  to  meet  the  normal
short-term  working  capital  needs  of  the  Company.  The
line of credit is not a commitment and, therefore, credit 
availability  is  subject  to  ongoing  approval.  The  line  of
credit expires on October 1, 2002, and bears interest at
the prime rate (4.75% at March 31, 2002). There were no
borrowings  outstanding  under  this  line  of  credit  as  of
March 31, 2002.

Note K — Other (Income) Expense, net

Included in other (income) expense in the accompa-
nying  consolidated  statements  of  operations  is  (i)  the
reversal of a previous litigation accrual of ($210) for the
fiscal year ended March 31, 2002, (ii) $463 in lease ter-
mination costs for the fiscal year ended March 25, 2001,
and (iii) $236 in connection with the satisfaction of cer-
tain  financial  guarantees  and  $191  in  lease  expense
resulting from the default of subleases for the fiscal year
ended March 26, 2000.

Note L — Income Taxes

Income tax provision (benefit) consists of the follow-
ing for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002, March 25,
2001 and March 26, 2000:

Federal

Current
Deferred

2002

2001

2000

$911
(93)

$ 868
246

$ 461
(719)

818

1,114

(258)

160
(16)

144

235
67

302

247
(239)

8

$962

$1,416

$(250)

Less current portion

Long-term portion

1,779
(559)

3,132
(1,343)

$ 1,220

$ 1,789

State and local

Current
Deferred

The above notes are secured by the related property

and equipment.

Nathan’s Famous, Inc. & Subsidiaries

21

2002 Annual Report

Total income tax provision (benefit) for the fiscal years
ended  March  31,  2002,  March  25,  2001  and  March  26,
2000  differed  from  the  amounts  computed  by  applying
the  United  States  Federal  income  tax  rate  of  34%  to
income before income taxes as a result of the following:

Computed “expected” tax 

(benefit) expense

Nondeductible amortization
State and local income taxes, net 
of Federal income tax benefit
Tax-exempt investment earnings
Nondeductible meals and 
entertainment and other

2002

2001

2000

$752
169

$1,027
222

$(516)
212

106
(68)

199
(30)

8
(30)

3

(2)

76

$962

$1,416

$(250)

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise
to  significant  portions  of  the  deferred  tax  assets  and
deferred tax liabilities are presented below:

March 31, March 25,

2002

2001

Deferred tax assets:
Accrued expenses
Allowance for doubtful accounts
Impairment of notes receivable
Deferred revenue
Depreciation expense and 

impairment of long-lived assets
Expenses not deductible until paid
Amortization of intangibles
Net operating loss and 
other carryforwards

Other

$1,164
291
256
978

1,101
130
105

676
59

$

602
352
245
1,243

2,134
372
70

2,326
106

Total gross deferred 

tax assets

Deferred tax liabilities:

Amortization of intangibles
Unrealized gain on marketable 

securities and income 
on investment in limited 
partnership

Other

Total gross deferred 

tax liabilities

Net deferred tax asset

Less valuation allowance

4,760

7,450

422

—

207
320

949

209
720

929

3,811
(525)

6,521
(2,726)

$3,286

$ 3,795

The  determination  that  the  net  deferred  tax  asset  of
$3,286  and  $3,795  at  March  31,  2002  and  March  25,
2001,  respectively,  is  realizable  is  based  on  anticipated
future taxable income.

At  March  31,  2002,  as  a  result  of  settling  the  Miami
Subs  IRS  audits  for  the  years  1991  through  1996,
the  Company  had  a  net  operating  loss  carryforward  of
approximately $1,289 remaining (after certain IRS agreed-
upon adjustments and other reductions due to expiring
losses) which is available to offset future taxable income
through 2005 and general business credit carryforwards
remaining of approximately $87 which may be used to

offset  liabilities  through  2008.  These  losses  and  credits
are  subject  to  limitations  imposed  under  the  Internal
Revenue Code pursuant to Section 382 regarding changes
in  ownership.  As  a  result  of  these  limitations,  the
Company  has  recorded  a  valuation  allowance  for 
the Miami Subs loss carryforwards and credits related to
the acquisition (Note N-3).

Note M — Stockholders’ Equity, Stock Plans and
Other Employee Benefit Plans

1. Stock Option Plans

On  December  15,  1992,  the  Company  adopted  the
1992  Stock  Option  Plan  (the  “1992  Plan”),  which  pro-
vides  for  the  issuance  of  incentive  stock  options
(“ISO’s”)  to  officers  and  key  employees  and  nonquali-
fied stock options to directors, officers and key employ-
ees. Up to 525,000 shares of common stock have been
reserved for issuance under the 1992 Plan. The terms of
the  options  are  generally  ten  years,  except  for  ISO’s
granted to any employee, whom prior to the granting of
the  option,  owns  stock  representing  more  than  10%  of
the voting rights, for which the option term will be five
years. The exercise price for nonqualified stock options
outstanding under the 1992 Plan can be no less than the
fair market value, as defined, of the Company’s common
stock at the date of grant. For ISO’s, the exercise price
can  generally  be  no  less  than  the  fair  market  value  of
the Company’s common stock at the date of grant, with
the exception of any employee who, prior to the grant-
ing  of  the  option,  owns  stock  representing  more  than
10%  of  the  voting  rights,  for  which  the  exercise  price
can  be  no  less  than  110%  of  fair  market  value  of  the
Company’s common stock at the date of grant.

On May 24, 1994, the Company adopted the Outside
Director Stock Option Plan (the “Directors’ Plan”), which
provides for the issuance of nonqualified stock options
to nonemployee directors, as defined, of the Company.
Under  the  Directors’  Plan,  200,000  shares  of  common
stock have been authorized and issued pursuant to the
Directors’ Plan. Options awarded to each nonemployee
director are fully vested, subject to forfeiture under cer-
tain conditions and shall be exercisable upon vesting.

In  April  1998,  the  Company  adopted  the  Nathan’s
Famous  Inc.  1998  Stock  Option  Plan  (the  “1998  Plan”),
which  provides  for  the  issuance  of  nonqualified  stock
options to directors, officers and key employees. Up to
500,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for
issuance under the 1998 Plan.

In  June  2001,  the  Company  adopted  the  Nathan’s
Famous  Inc.  2001  Stock  Option  Plan  (the  “2001  Plan”),
which  provides  for  the  issuance  of  nonqualified  stock
options to directors, officers and key employees. Up to
350,000 shares of common stock have been reserved for
issuance under the 1998 Plan.

The 1992 Plan, the 1998 Plan, the 2001 Plan and the
Directors’  Plan  expire  on  December  2,  2002,  April  5,
2008,  June  13,  2011  and  December  31,  2004,  respec-
tively, unless terminated earlier by the Board of Directors
under conditions specified in the Plan.

Nathan’s Famous, Inc. & Subsidiaries

22

2002 Annual Report

The Company issued 478,584 stock options to employ-
ees  of  Miami  Subs  Corporation  to  replace  957,168  of
previously  issued  Miami  Subs  options  pursuant  to  the
merger  agreement  and  issued  47,006  new  options.  All
options  were  fully  vested  upon  consummation  of  the
merger. Exercise prices range from a low of $3.1875 to a
high  of  $22.2517  per  share  and  expire  at  various  times
through September 30, 2009.

2. Warrants

In November 1996, the Company granted to a nonem-
ployee  consultant  a  warrant  to  purchase  50,000  shares
of  its  common  stock  at  an  exercise  price  of  $3.94  per
share,  which  represented  the  market  price  of  the
Company’s  common  stock  on  the  date  of  grant.  Upon

the date of grant, one-third of the shares vested immedi-
ately,  one-third  vested  on  the  first  anniversary  thereof,
and  the  remaining  one-third  vested  on  the  second
anniversary  thereof.  The  warrant  expired,  unexercised,
on November 24, 2001.

In  connection  with  the  merger  with  Miami  Subs,  the
Company issued 579,040 warrants to purchase common
stock  to  the  former  shareholders  of  Miami  Subs.  These
warrants  expire  on  September  30,  2004  and  have  an
exercise  price  of  $6.00  per  share.  The  Company  also
issued 63,700 warrants to purchase common stock to the
former  warrant  holders  of  Miami  Subs.  Exercise  prices
range  between  $16.55  per  share  and  $49.63  per  share
expiring through March 2006.

A summary of the status of the Company’s stock option plans and warrants, excluding warrants issued to former
shareholders of Miami Subs, at March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000 and changes during the fiscal
years then ended is presented in the tables and narrative below:

Options outstanding—beginning of year
Granted
Replacement options—Miami Subs
Canceled

Options outstanding—end of year

Options exercisable—end of year

Weighted average fair value of options granted

Warrants outstanding—beginning of year
Replacement warrants—Miami Subs
Expired

Warrants outstanding—end of year

Warrants exercisable—end of year

Weighted average fair value of warrants granted

2002

2001

2000

Shares

1,514,209
307,000
—
(63)

1,821,146

1,367,479

368,750
—
(50,000)

318,750

318,750

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

$3.86
3.20
—
6.20

4.29

$1.30

$4.53
—
3.94

4.62

$ —

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

$ 4.79
—
—
10.60

Shares

1,614,924
—
—
(100,715)

Shares

707,667
512,006
478,584
(83,333)

1,514,209

3.86

1,614,924

1,220,876

1,086,424

401,200
—
(32,450)

368,750

368,750

$ —

$ 5.66
—
18.61

4.53

$ —

350,000
63,700
(12,500)

401,200

401,200

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

$ 5.08
3.34
6.04
5.50

4.79

$ 2.10

$ 3.88
24.09
49.63

5.66

$ —

At March 31, 2002, 153,666 common shares were reserved for future stock option grants.
The following table summarizes information about stock options and warrants (excluding warrants issued to the

Miami Subs shareholders as part of the merger consideration) at March 31, 2002:

Options and Warrants Outstanding

Options and
Warrants Exercisable

Number
Outstanding
at 3/31/02

1,459,558
580,588
99,750

2,139,896

Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Life

6.7
2.5
1.8

5.3

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

$ 3.35
5.41
12.61

$ 4.34

Number
Exercisable
at 3/31/02

1,005,891
580,588
99,750

1,686,229

Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price

$ 3.39
5.41
12.61

$ 4.63

Range of
Exercise Prices

$3.19 to $ 4.00
4.01 to 
7.00
7.01 to  22.25

$3.19 to $22.25

Nathan’s Famous, Inc. & Subsidiaries

23

2002 Annual Report

The fair value of each option and warrant grant is esti-
mated  on  the  date  of  grant  using  the  Black-Scholes
option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

Expected life (years)
Interest rate
Volatility
Dividend yield

2002

2000

6.6

6.3

4.06% 6.22%
32.3% 59.3%
0%

0%

There  were  no  options  or  warrants  granted  during 

fiscal 2001.

The  Company  has  adopted  the  pro  forma  disclosure
provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation.” Accordingly, no compensation cost has
been  recognized  in  the  accompanying  financial  state-
ments  for  the  stock  option  plans.  Had  compensation
cost  for  the  Company’s  stock  option  plans  been  deter-
mined under SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net income 
(loss)  and  income  (loss)  per  share  would  approximate
the pro forma amounts below:

2002

2001

2000

Net income (loss):
As reported
Pro forma

Net income (loss) per share:

Basic

As reported
Pro forma

Diluted

As reported
Pro forma

$1,249
839

$1,606
1,248

$(1,270)
(1,907)

$ .18
.12

$ .18
.12

$

$

.23
.18

.23
.18

$

$

(.22)
(.32)

(.22)
(.32)

Because  the  SFAS  No.  123  method  of  accounting  is
not applied to options granted prior to January 1, 1995,
the  resulting  pro  forma  compensation  cost  may  not  be
representative of that to be expected in future years.

3. Common Stock Purchase Rights

On  June  20,  1995,  the  Board  of  Directors  declared  a
dividend  distribution  of  one  common  stock  purchase
right  (the  “Rights”)  for  each  outstanding  share  of 
common  stock  of  the  Company.  The  distribution  was
paid on June 20, 1995 to the shareholders of record on
June  20,  1995.  The  terms  of  the  Rights  were  amended
on April 6, 1998 and December 8, 1999. Each Right, as
amended,  entitles  the  registered  holder  thereof  to  pur-
chase  from  the  Company  one  share  of  the  common
stock  at  a  price  of  $4.00  per  share  (the  “Purchase
Price”),  subject  to  adjustment  for  anti-dilution.  New
common  stock  certificates  issued  after  June  20,  1995
upon  transfer  or  new  issuance  of  the  common  stock 
will  contain  a  notation  incorporating  the  Rights  Agree-
ment by reference.

The  Rights  are  not  exercisable  until  the  Distribution
Date.  The  Distribution  Date  is  the  earlier  to  occur  of 
(i) ten days following a public announcement that a per-
son  or  group  of  affiliated  or  associated  persons  (an
“Acquiring  Person”)  acquired,  or  obtained  the  right  to
acquire,  beneficial  ownership  of  15%  or  more  of  the
outstanding  shares  of  the  common  stock,  as  amended,
or  (ii)  ten  business  days  (or  such  later  date  as  may  be 

determined by action of the Board of Directors prior to
such time as any person becomes an Acquiring Person)
following  the  commencement,  or  announcement  of  an
intention to make a tender offer or exchange offer by a
person  (other  than  the  Company,  any  wholly-owned
subsidiary of the Company or certain employee benefit
plans)  which,  if  consummated,  would  result  in  such 
person  becoming  an  Acquiring  Person.  The  Rights  will
expire  on  June  19,  2005,  unless  earlier  redeemed  by 
the Company.

At  any  time  prior  to  the  time  at  which  a  person  or
group  or  affiliated  or  associated  persons  has  acquired
beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the outstanding
shares of the common stock of the Company, the Board
of Directors of the Company may redeem the Rights in
whole, but not in part, at a price of $.001 per Right. In
addition, the Rights Agreement, as amended, permits the
Board  of  Directors,  following  the  acquisition  by  a  per-
son or group of beneficial ownership of 15% or more of
the common stock (but before an acquisition of 50% or
more of common stock), to exchange the Rights (other
than  Rights  owned  by  such  15%  person  or  group),  in
whole  or  in  part,  for  common  stock,  at  an  exchange
ratio of one share of common stock per Right.

Until a Right is exercised, the holder thereof, as such,
will  have  no  rights  as  a  shareholder  of  the  Company,
including,  without  limitation,  the  right  to  vote  or  to
receive dividends. The Company has reserved 9,358,764
shares  of  common  stock  for  issuance  upon  exercise  of
the Rights.

4. Stock Repurchase Plan

On September 14, 2001, the Board of Directors of the
Company authorized the repurchase of up to 1,000,000 
shares  of  the  Company’s  common  stock.  Purchases  of
stock  will  be  made  from  time  to  time,  depending  on
market conditions, in open market or in privately nego-
tiated  transactions,  at  prices  deemed  appropriate  by
management.  There  is  no  set  time  limit  on  the  pur-
chases. The Company expects to fund these stock repur-
chases from its operating cash flow. Through March 31,
2002, 41,691 shares have been repurchased at a cost of
approximately $135.

On April 10, 2002, the Company repurchased 751,000
shares  of  the  Company’s  common  stock  for  aggregate
consideration  of  $2,741  in  a  private  transaction  with  a
stockholder.

5. Employment Agreements

The  Company  and  its  Chairman  and  Chief  Executive
Officer  entered  into  a  new  employment  agreement
effective  as  of  January  1,  2000.  The  new  employment
agreement  expires  December  31,  2004.  Pursuant  to  the
agreement,  the  officer  receives  a  base  salary  of  $1.00
and  an  annual  bonus  equal  to  5%  of  the  Company’s
consolidated pretax earnings for each fiscal year, with a
minimum  bonus  of  $250.  The  new  employment  agree-
ment further provides for a three-year consulting period
after termination of employment during which the offi-
cer  will  receive  consulting  payments  in  an  annual 

Nathan’s Famous, Inc. & Subsidiaries

24

2002 Annual Report

amount equal to two-thirds of the average of the annual
bonuses  awarded  to  him  during  the  three  fiscal  years
preceding  the  fiscal  year  of  termination  of  his  employ-
ment. The employment agreement also provides for the
continuation  of  certain  benefits  following  death  or  dis-
ability. In connection with the agreement, the Company
issued  to  the  officer  25,000  shares  of  common  stock
with a fair market value at the date of grant of approxi-
mately $78.

In  the  event  that  the  officer’s  employment  is  termi-
nated without cause, he is entitled to receive his salary
and incentive payment, if any, for the remainder of the
contract  term.  The  employment  agreement  further  pro-
vides that in the event there is a change in control of the
Company, as defined therein, the officer has the option,
exercisable within one year after such an event, to ter-
minate his employment agreement. Upon such termina-
tion,  he  has  the  right  to  receive  a  lump  sum  payment
equal to the greater of (i) his salary and annual bonuses
for the remainder of the employment term (including a
pro rated bonus for any partial fiscal year), which bonus
shall  be  equal  to  the  average  of  the  annual  bonuses
awarded to him during the three fiscal years preceding
the fiscal year of termination; or (ii) 2.99 times his salary
and annual bonus of the fiscal year immediately preced-
ing the fiscal year of termination, as well as a lump sum
cash payment equal to the difference between the exer-
cise price of any exercisable options having an exercise
price  of  less  than  the  current  market  price  of  the
Company’s common stock and such then current market
price. In addition, the Company will provide the officer
with a tax gross-up payment to cover any excise tax due.
The  Company  and  its  President  and  Chief  Operating
Officer  entered  into  an  employment  agreement  on
December 28, 1992 for a period commencing on January
1, 1993 and ending on December 31, 1996. The employ-
ment  agreement  has  been  extended  annually  through
December 31, 2001, based on the original terms, and no
nonrenewal  notice  has  been  given  as  of  May  24,  2002.
The  agreement  provides  for  annual  compensation  of
$275 plus certain other benefits. In November 1993, the
Company  amended  this  agreement  to  include  a  provi-
sion  under  which  the  officer  has  the  right  to  terminate
the  agreement  and  receive  payment  equal  to  approxi-
mately three times annual compensation upon a change
in control, as defined.

The Company and the President of Miami Subs, pur-
suant to the merger agreement, entered into an employ-
ment  agreement  on  September  30,  1999  for  a  period
commencing  on  September  30,  1999  and  ending  on
September 30, 2002. The agreement provides for annual
compensation  of  $200  plus  certain  other  benefits  and
automatically  renews  annually  unless  180  days  prior
written notice is given to the employee. The agreement
includes  a  provision  under  which  the  officer  has  the
right  to  terminate  the  agreement  and  receive  payment
equal  to  approximately  three  times  annual  compensa-
tion upon a change in control, as defined.

The  Company  and  one  executive  of  Miami  Subs
entered  into  a  change  of  control  agreement  effective
November 1, 2001 for annual compensation of $130 per
year.  The  agreement  additionally  includes  a  provision
under which the executive has the right to terminate the
agreement and receive payment equal to approximately
three times annual compensation upon a change in con-
trol, as defined.

The  Company  and  one  executive  of  Miami  Subs
entered  into  an  employment  agreement  effective  as  of
July 1, 2001 for a period commencing on the date of the
agreement and ending on July 1, 2003 and for compen-
sation  of  $125  per  year.  The  Company  and  another
executive  of  Miami  Subs  entered  into  an  employment
agreement  effective  August  1,  2001  for  a  period  com-
mencing  on  the  date  of  the  agreement  and  ending  on
September  30,  2003  and  for  compensation  at  $90  per
year.  Each  agreement  also  provides  for  certain  other
benefits.  Each  agreement  additionally  includes  a  provi-
sion  under  which  the  executive  has  the  right  to  termi-
nate  the  agreement  and  receive  payment  equal  to
approximately  three  times  the  employee’s  annual  com-
pensation upon a change in control, as defined.

Each  employment  agreement  terminates  upon  death
or voluntary termination by the respective employee or
may be terminated by the Company upon 30-days’ prior
written notice by the Company in the event of disability
or “cause,” as defined in each agreement.

6. 401(k) Plan

The  Company  has  a  defined  contribution  retirement
plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code
covering all nonunion employees over age 21 who have
been  employed  by  the  Company  for  at  least  one  year.
Employees may contribute to the plan, on a tax-deferred
basis,  up  to  15%  of  their  total  annual  salary.  Company
contributions are discretionary. Beginning with the plan
year ending February 28, 1994, the Company elected to
match  contributions  at  a  rate  of  $.25  per  dollar  con-
tributed by the employee on up to a maximum of 3% of
the  employee’s  total  annual  salary.  Employer  contribu-
tions  for  the  fiscal  years  ended  March  31,  2002,  March
25,  2001  and  March  26,  2000  were  $36,  $25  and  $21,
respectively.

7. Other Benefits

The Company provides, on a contributory basis, med-
ical  benefits  to  active  employees.  The  Company  does
not provide medical benefits to retirees.

Note N — Commitments and Contingencies

1. Commitments

The  Company’s  operations  are  principally  conducted
in  leased  premises.  The  leases  generally  have  initial
terms ranging from 5 to 20 years and usually provide for
renewal options ranging from 5 to 20 years. Most of the 
leases  contain  escalation  clauses  and  common  area
maintenance  charges  (including  taxes  and  insurance). 

Nathan’s Famous, Inc. & Subsidiaries

25

2002 Annual Report

Certain  of  the  leases  require  additional  (contingent)
rental  payments  if  sales  volumes  at  the  related  restau-
rants exceed specified limits. As of March 31, 2002, the
Company  has  noncancelable  operating  lease  commit-
ments, net of certain sublease rental income, as follows:

Lease
Commitments

Sublease
Income

Net Lease
Commitments

2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Thereafter

$ 4,784
4,313
4,209
3,988
3,763
13,194

$34,251

$ 2,434
2,080
2,005
1,904
1,762
7,416

$17,601

$ 2,350
2,233
2,204
2,084
2,001
5,778

$16,650

Aggregate  rental  expense,  net  of  sublease  income,
under all current leases amounted to $2,734, $3,549 and
$2,848 for the fiscal years ended March 31, 2002, March
25, 2001 and March 26, 2000, respectively.

The Company also owns or leases sites, which it leases
or subleases to franchisees. The Company remains liable
for  all  lease  costs  when  properties  are  subleased  to 
franchisees.

The Company also subleases non-Miami Subs locations
to  third  parties.  Such  subleases  provide  for  minimum
annual  rental  payments  by  the  Company  aggregating
approximately $2.4 million and expire on various dates
through 2010 exclusive of renewal options.

Contingent  rental  payments  on  building  leases  are
typically  made  based  on  the  percentage  of  gross  sales
on the individual restaurants that exceed predetermined
levels.  The  percentage  of  gross  sales  to  be  paid  and
related gross sales level vary by unit. Contingent rental
expense was approximately $129, $123 and $123 for the
fiscal years ended March 31, 2002, March 25, 2001 and
March 26, 2000, respectively.

The Company guarantees certain equipment financing
for franchisees with a third-party lender. The Company’s
maximum obligation for loans funded by the lender, as
of March 31, 2002, was approximately $1.4 million.

The  Company  also  guarantees  a  franchisee’s  note
payable with a bank. The Company’s maximum obliga-
tion  for  loans  funded  by  the  lender,  as  of  March  31,
2002, was approximately $333.

2. Contingencies

Nathan’s Famous, Inc. and Nathan’s Famous Operating
Corp.  were  named  as  two  of  three  defendants  in  an
action  commenced  in  July  2001,  in  the  Supreme  Court 
of  New  York,  Westchester  County.  According  to  the
amended  complaint,  the  plaintiffs,  a  minor  and  her
mother, are seeking damages in the amount of $17 mil-
lion against Nathan’s Famous, Inc. and Nathan’s Famous
Operating  Corp.  and  one  of  Nathan’s  Famous’  former
employees  claiming  that  the  Nathan’s  entities  failed  to
properly  supervise  minor  employees,  failed  to  monitor
its supervisory personnel, and were negligent in hiring,
retaining  and  promoting  the  individual  defendant,  who
allegedly molested, harassed and raped the minor plain-
tiff, who was also an employee. On May 29, 2002, as a

result of a mediation, this action was settled, subject to
final  Court  approval.  In  the  event  the  Court  approves
the settlement, the plaintiffs will be paid $650 which has
been accrued for as a component of “Accrued expenses
and  other  current  liabilities”  in  the  accompanying  bal-
ance sheets.

An action has been commenced, in the Circuit Court
of  the  Fifteenth  Judicial  Circuit,  Palm  Beach  County,
Florida, in September 2001 against Miami Subs and EKFD
Corporation, a Miami Subs franchisee (the “franchisee”)
claiming  negligence  in  connection  with  a  slip  and  fall
which  allegedly  occurred  on  the  premises  of  the  fran-
chisee for unspecified damages. Pursuant to the terms of
the  Miami  Subs  Franchise  Agreement,  the  franchisee  is
obligated to indemnify Miami Subs and hold them harm-
less  against  claims  asserted  and  procured  an  insurance
policy which named Miami Subs as an additional insured.
Miami Subs has denied any liability to plaintiffs and has
made  demand  upon  the  franchisee’s  insurer  to  indem-
nify and defend against the claims asserted. The insurer
has agreed to indemnify and defend Miami Subs and has
assumed the defense of this action for Miami Subs.

The Company is involved in various other litigation in
the  normal  course  of  business,  none  of  which,  in  the
opinion of management, will have a significant adverse
impact on its financial position or results of operations.

3. Miami Subs Tax Audit

As a result of the Miami Subs acquisition, the Company
obtained  a  net  operating  loss  carryforward  of  approxi-
mately $5.9 million and a general business credit carry-
forward of approximately $274. The Miami Subs Federal
income tax returns for all fiscal years 1991 through 1996,
inclusive, have been examined by the Internal Revenue
Service. In January 2002, the Miami Subs tax audit was
settled  with  the  IRS  Appeals  Office.  The  settlement
resulted  in  a  reduction  of  the  net  operating  loss  carry-
forward to $4,004 and an adjustment to the general busi-
ness  credit  to  $300.  Each  of  these  carryforwards  were
subject to reductions due to various expiration dates. In
addition  to  these  adjustments,  the  Company  made  tax
and  interest  payments  totaling  $344  in  full  settlement 
of the audit. As of March 31, 2002, the remaining net
operating loss carryforward is $1,289 and the remaining
general  business  credit  is  $87.  These  losses  and  credits
are  subject  to  limitations  imposed  under  the  Internal
Revenue  Code  pursuant  to  section  382  regarding
changes  in  ownership.  As  a  result  of  these  limitations,
the Company has recorded a valuation allowance for the
remaining  Miami  Subs  loss  carryforwards  and  credits
related to the acquisition.

Note O — Related Party Transactions

As of March 31, 2002, Miami Subs leased two restau-
rant  properties  from  Kavala,  Inc.,  a  private  company
owned  by  Gus  Boulis,  a  former  shareholder  of  Miami
Subs.  Future  minimum  rental  commitments  due  to
Kavala  at  March  31,  2002  under  these  existing  leases
was approximately $1.2 million.

Nathan’s Famous, Inc. & Subsidiaries

26

2002 Annual Report

Mr.  Donald  L.  Perlyn  has  been  an  officer  of  Miami
Subs  since  1990,  a  Director  since  1997  and  President
and Chief Operating Officer since July 1998. Mr. Perlyn
has been a director of Nathan’s since October 1999. Mr.
Perlyn served as a member of the Board of Directors of
Arthur  Treacher’s,  Inc.  until  March  2002  when  Arthur
Treacher’s, Inc. was sold in a private transaction. Miami
Subs  has  been  granted  certain  exclusive  co-branding
rights  by  Arthur  Treacher’s,  Inc.  and  Mr.  Perlyn  had
been granted options to acquire approximately 175,000
shares  of  Arthur  Treacher’s  common  stock.  These
options  were  converted  into  options  of  the  entity  that
sold Arthur Treacher’s, Inc.

Note P — Significant Fourth Quarter Adjustments

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2002, the Company’s
management  continued  to  monitor  and  evaluate  the 
collectibility  and  potential  impairment  of  its  assets,  in
particular,  notes  receivable  and  certain  fixed  assets.  In
connection  therewith,  impairment  charges  on  certain
notes  receivable  of  $185  and  impairment  charges  on

fixed assets of $685 were recorded in the fourth quarter.
It  is  management’s  opinion  that  these  adjustments  are
properly  recorded  in  the  fourth  quarter  based  upon 
the  facts  and  circumstances  that  became  available  in 
that period.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2000, the Company’s
management continued to monitor and evaluate the col-
lectibility and potential impairment of its assets, in par-
ticular,  notes  receivable  and  certain  fixed  assets.  In
connection therewith, additional allowances for doubtful
accounts  of  $399,  impairment  charges  on  certain  notes
receivable  of  $273  and  impairment  charges  on  fixed
assets  of  $465  were  recorded  in  the  fourth  quarter.
Additionally,  Nathan’s  recorded  a  $191  lease  rental
reserve resulting from the default of subleases for space
which  is  not  expected  to  be  utilized  by  Nathan’s  and
$236 in connection with the satisfaction of certain finan-
cial  guarantees.  It  is  management’s  opinion  that  these
adjustments are properly recorded in the fourth quarter
based  upon  the  facts  and  circumstances  that  became
available in that period.

Note Q — Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)

Fiscal Year 2002
Revenues
Gross profit (a)
Net income (loss)

Per share information
Net income (loss) per share:

Basic (b)

Diluted (b)

Shares used in computation of net income (loss) per share:

Basic (b)

Diluted (b)

Fiscal Year 2001
Revenues
Gross profit (a)
Net income (loss)

Per share information
Net income (loss) per share:

Basic(b)

Diluted (b)

Shares used in computation of net income (loss) per share:

Basic(b)

Diluted (b)

First
Quarter

Second
Quarter

Third
Quarter

Fourth
Quarter

$11,876
2,988
962

$11,785
3,200
654

$10,380
2,317
263

$10,358
2,201
(630)

$

$

.14

.14

$

$

.09

.09

$

$

.04

.04

$

$

(.09)

(.09)

7,065,000

7,065,000

7,038,000

7,024,000

7,084,000

7,080,000

7,062,000

7,107,000

$ 12,899
3,423
745

$ 12,666
3,457
933

$ 11,418
2,821
145

$ 10,191
2,568
(217)

$

$

.11

.11

$

$

.13

.13

$

$

.02

.02

$

$

(.03)

(.03)

7,040,000

7,065,000

7,065,000

7,065,000

7,044,000

7,155,000

7,065,000

7,130,000

(a) Gross profit represents the difference between sales and the cost of sales.
(b) The sum of the quarters may not equal the full year per share amounts included in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations due

to the effect of the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the fiscal years as compared to the quarters.

Nathan’s Famous, Inc. & Subsidiaries

27

2002 Annual Report

R E P O R T   O F   I N D E P E N D E N T   C E R T I F I E D   P U B L I C   A C C O U N TA N T S

Board of Directors and Shareholders
Nathan’s Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries

We have audited the accompanying consolidated 
balance  sheet  of  Nathan’s  Famous,  Inc.  (a  Delaware
Corporation)  and  subsidiaries  (the  “Company”)  as  of
March 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements
of  operations,  stockholders’  equity  and  cash  flows  for
the  fifty-three  weeks  then  ended.  These  financial  state-
ments are the responsibility of the Company’s manage-
ment.  Our  responsibility  is  to  express  an  opinion  on
these financial statements based on our audit.

We  conducted  our  audit  in  accordance  with  auditing
standards  generally  accepted  in  the  United  States  of
America. Those standards require that we plan and per-
form  the  audit  to  obtain  reasonable  assurance  about
whether the financial statements are free of material mis-
statement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting  principles  used  and  significant  estimates
made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial  statement  presentation.  We  believe  that  our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In  our  opinion,  the  financial  statements  referred  to
above  present  fairly,  in  all  material  respects,  the  finan-
cial  position  of  Nathan’s  Famous,  Inc.  and  subsidiaries
as of March 31, 2002, and the results of their operations
and their cash flows for the fifty-three weeks then ended
in  conformity  with  accounting  principles  generally
accepted in the United States of America.

Melville, New York
May 24, 2002 (except for Note N-2, as to 
which the date is May 29, 2002)

R E P O R T   O F   I N D E P E N D E N T   P U B L I C   A C C O U N TA N T S

To Nathan’s Famous, Inc. and Subsidiaries:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated bal-
ance  sheets  of  Nathan’s  Famous,  Inc.,  (a  Delaware
Corporation) and subsidiaries as of March 25, 2001 and
March 26, 2000, and the related consolidated statements
of  operations,  stockholders’  equity  and  cash  flows  for
each  of  the  three  fiscal  years  ended  March  25,  2001.
These  financial  statements  are  the  responsibility  of  the
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express
an  opinion  on  these  financial  statements  based  on  our
audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing
standards generally accepted in the United States. Those
standards  require  that  we  plan  and  perform  the  audit 
to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the finan-
cial  statements  are  free  of  material  misstatement.  An
audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence sup-
porting  the  amounts  and  disclosures  in  the  financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the account-
ing  principles  used  and  significant  estimates  made  by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement  presentation.  We  believe  that  our  audits  pro-
vide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In  our  opinion,  the  financial  statements  referred  to
above  present  fairly,  in  all  material  respects,  the  finan-
cial  position  of  Nathan’s  Famous,  Inc.  and  subsidiaries 

as of March 25, 2001 and March 26, 2000, and the results
of their operations and their cash flows for each of the
three  fiscal  years  ended  March  25,  2001  in  conformity
with  accounting  principles  generally  accepted  in  the
United States.

Melville, New York
June 14, 2001

This Report of Independent Certified Public Account-
ants  is  a  copy  of  a  previously  issued  Arthur  Andersen
LLP  (“Andersen”)  report  and  has  not  been  reissued  by
Andersen.  The  inclusion  of  this  previously  issued
Andersen  report  is  pursuant  to  the  “Temporary  Final
Rule and Final Rule: Requirements for Arthur Andersen
LLP  Auditing  Clients,”  issued  by  the  U.S.  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  in  March  2002.  Note  that  this 
previously  issued  Andersen  report  includes  references 
to  certain  fiscal  years,  which  are  not  required  to  be 
presented  in  the  accompanying  consolidated  financial
statements  as  of  and  for  the  fiscal  years  ended  March 
31, 2002.

Nathan’s Famous, Inc. & Subsidiaries

28

2002 Annual Report

Market for Registrant’s Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters

Nathan’s Famous, Inc. & Subsidiaries

Common Stock Prices

Dividend Policy

Our common stock began trading on the over-the-counter
market  on  February  26,  1993  and  is  quoted  on  the
Nasdaq National Market(cid:2) (“Nasdaq(cid:2)”) under the symbol
“NATH.” The following table sets forth the high and low
closing share prices per share for the periods indicated:

Fiscal year ended March 31, 2002

First quarter
Second quarter
Third quarter
Fourth quarter

Fiscal year ended March 25, 2001

First quarter
Second quarter
Third quarter
Fourth quarter

High

Low

$3.50
3.55
3.60
3.62

$4.00
3.94
3.81
3.88

$2.87
3.10
3.07
3.21

$2.75
2.88
2.56
2.88

At June 7, 2002, the closing price per share for our com-
mon stock, as reported by Nasdaq, was $3.8820.

We  have  not  declared  or  paid  a  cash  dividend  on  our
common  stock  since  our  initial  public  offering.  It  is  our
Board  of  Directors’  policy  to  retain  all  available  funds  to
finance the development and growth of our business. The
payment of cash dividends in the future will be depend-
ent upon our earnings and financial requirements.

Shareholders

As of June 7, 2002, we had 830 shareholders of record,
excluding  shareholders  whose  shares  were  held  by  bro-
kerage firms, depositories and other institutional firms in
“street name” for their customers.

Annual Shareholders’ Meeting

The Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company will
be held at 10:00 a.m., EST on Thursday, September 12,
2002 in the Conference Room on the lower level of 1400
Old Country Road, Westbury, New York.

Corporate Directory

List of Directors
Howard M. Lorber
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, Nathan’s Famous, Inc.
Wayne Norbitz
President & Chief Operating Officer, Nathan’s Famous, Inc.
Donald L. Perlyn
Executive Vice President, Nathan’s Famous, Inc.
Robert J. Eide
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer, AEGIS Capital Corp.
Barry Leistner
President & Chief Executive Officer, Koenig Iron Works, Inc.
Brian Genson
President, Pole Position Investments
A.F. Petrocelli
Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer, 
United Capital Corp.

List of Officers
Howard M. Lorber
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
Wayne Norbitz
President & Chief Operating Officer
Donald L. Perlyn
Executive Vice President
Carl Paley
Senior Vice President—Franchise & Real Estate Development
Ronald G. DeVos
Vice President—Finance, Chief Financial Officer & Secretary
Donald Schedler
Vice President—Architecture & Construction

Independent Auditors
Grant Thornton LLP
One Huntington Quadrangle, Melville, New York 11747

Corporate Counsel
Blau, Kramer, Wactlar & Lieberman, P.C.
100 Jericho Quadrangle, Jericho, New York 11753

Transfer Agent
American Stock Transfer & Trust Company
40 Wall Street, New York, New York 10005

Form 10-K
The  Company’s  annual  report  on  Form  10-K  as  filed  with 
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission,  is  available  upon 
written request:

Secretary, Nathan’s Famous, Inc.
1400 Old Country Road
Westbury, New York 11590

Quarterly Shareholder Letter
Will  be  available  on  our  website.  Copies  will  be  provided
upon request.

Corporate Headquarters
1400 Old Country Road, Westbury, New York 11590
516-338-8500 Telephone
516-338-7220 Facsimile

Company Website
www.nathansfamous.com

m
o
c
.
s
r
o
n
n
o
c
-
n
a
r
r
u
c
.
w
w
w

/

.
c
n
I

,
s
r
o
n
n
o
C

&

n
a
r
r
u
C

y
b

d
e
n
g
i
s
e
D

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1 4 0 0   O l d   C o u n t r y   Ro a d ,   S u i t e   4 0 0   •   We s t b u r y,   N e w   Yo r k   1 1 5 9 0

w w w. n a t h a n s f a m o u s . c o m

“A Family of Brands

Positioned for Growth.”