More annual reports from Navios Maritime Acquisition Corporation:
2019 ReportPeers and competitors of Navios Maritime Acquisition Corporation:
Mitsui O.S.K. Lines Ltd.Table of Contents UNITED STATESSECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONWashington, D.C. 20549 FORM 20-F (Mark One)¨REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGEACT OF 1934OR xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012OR ¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934OR ¨SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACTOF 1934Date of event requiring this shell company report For the transition period from to Commission file number001-34104 Navios Maritime Acquisition Corporation(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) Not Applicable(Translation of Registrant’s Name into English)Republic of Marshall Islands(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)85Akti Miaouli StreetPiraeus, Greece 185 38(011) +30-210-4595000(Address of principal executive offices)Todd E. MasonThompson Hine LLP335 Madison AveNew York, NY 10017Todd.Mason@thompsonhine.com(212) 908-3946(Name, Telephone, E-mail and/or Facsimile number and Address of Company Contact Person)Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act. Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registeredCommon Stock, par value $.0001 per share New York Stock Exchange LLCUnits New York Stock Exchange LLCWarrants New York Stock Exchange LLCSecurities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act. NoneSecurities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d)of the Act. None Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuer’s classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report:40,504,661 Shares of Common Stock12,752 Units6,025,242 WarrantsIndicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No xIf this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or (15)(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934. Yes ¨ No xIndicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter periods that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such reportingrequirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required tobe submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period thatthe registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer andlarge accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):Large Accelerated Filer ¨ Accelerated Filer ¨ Non-Accelerated Filer xIndicate by check mark which basis of accounting the registrant has used to prepare the financial statements included in this filing: U.S. GAAP x International Financial Reporting Standards as issuedby the International Accounting Standards Board ¨ Other ¨If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x Table of ContentsTABLE OF CONTENTS PART I Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers 2Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected Timetable 2Item 3. Key Information 2Item 4. Information on the Company 28Item 4A. Unresolved Staff Comments 44Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects 44Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and Employees 66Item 7. Major Stockholders and Related Party Transactions 71Item 8. Financial Information 76Item 9. Listing Details 77Item 10. Additional Information 78Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks 89Item 12. Description of Securities Other than Equity Securities 89PART II Item 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and Delinquencies 90Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Shareholders and Use of Proceeds 90Item 15. Controls and Procedures 90Item 16A. Audit Committee Financial Expert 90Item 16B. Code of Ethics 91Item 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and Services 91Item 16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees 91Item 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers 91Item 16F. Change in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant 91Item 16G. Corporate Governance 91Item 16H. Mine Safety Disclosures 92Item 17. Financial Statements 92Item 18. Financial Statements 92Item 19. Exhibits 92Signatures EX-8.1 EX-12.1 EX-12.2 EX-13.1 EX-15.1 Table of ContentsFORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTSThis Annual Report should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and accompanying notes included herein.Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 20-F (this “Annual Report”) which are not historical facts (including our statements concerning plans andobjectives of management for future operations or economic performance, or assumptions related thereto) are forward-looking statements. In addition, we andour representatives may from time to time make other oral or written statements which are also forward-looking statements. Such statements include, inparticular, statements about our plans, strategies, business prospects, changes and trends in our business, and the markets in which we operate as described inthis Annual Report. In some cases, you can identify the forward-looking statements by the use of words such as “may,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “expect,”“plan,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “forecast,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “propose,” “potential,” “continue” or the negative of these terms or othercomparable terminology.Forward-looking statements appear in a number of places and include statements with respect to, among other things: • our ability to maintain or develop new and existing customer relationships, including our ability to enter into charters for our vessels; • our ability to successfully grow our business and our capacity to manage our expanding business; • our future operating and financial results, including the amount of fixed hire and profit share that we may receive; • our ability to identify and consummate desirable acquisitions, joint ventures or strategic alliances, business strategy, areas of possible expansion,and expected capital expenditure or operating expenses; • tanker industry trends, including charter rates and vessel values and factors affecting vessel supply and demand; • our ability to take delivery of, integrate into our fleet, and employ the newbuildings we have on firm order or any newbuildings we may order inthe future and the ability of shipyards to deliver vessels on a timely basis; • the aging of our vessels and resultant increases in operation and drydocking costs; • the ability of our vessels to pass classification inspection and vetting inspections by oil majors; • significant changes in vessel performance, including increased vessel breakdowns; • the creditworthiness of our charterers and the ability of our contract counterparties to fulfill their obligations to us; • our ability to repay outstanding indebtedness, to obtain additional financing and to obtain replacement charters for our vessels, in each case, atcommercially acceptable rates or at all; • changes to governmental rules and regulations or action taken by regulatory authorities and the expected costs thereof; • potential liability from litigation and our vessel operations, including discharge of pollutants; • changes in general economic and business conditions; • general domestic and international political conditions, including wars, acts of piracy and terrorism; • changes in production of or demand for oil and petroleum products, either globally or in particular regions; and • changes in the standard of service or the ability of our technical manager to be approved as required.These and other forward-looking statements are made based upon management’s current plans, expectations, estimates, assumptions and beliefs concerningfuture events impacting us and therefore involve a number of risks and uncertainties, including those set forth below, as well as those risks discussed in“Item 3. Key Information”.The forward-looking statements, contained in this Annual Report, are based on our current expectations and beliefs concerning future developments and theirpotential effects on us. There can be no assurance that future developments affecting us will be those that we have anticipated.The risks, uncertainties and assumptions involve known and unknown risks and are inherently subject to significant uncertainties and contingencies, manyof which are beyond our control. We caution that forward-looking statements are not guarantees and that actual results could differ materially from thoseexpressed or implied in the forward-looking statements.We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement or statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which such statementis made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict all of these factors.Further, we cannot assess the impact of each such factor on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual resultsto be materially different from those contained in any forward-looking statement. 1 Table of ContentsPART IItem 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and AdvisersNot Applicable.Item 2. Offer Statistics and Expected TimetableNot Applicable.Item 3. Key InformationA. Selected Financial DataNavios Maritime Acquisition Corporation (sometimes referred to herein as “Navios Acquisition”, the “Company”, “we” or “us”) was incorporated in theRepublic of Marshall Islands on March 14, 2008 (refer to Item 4. Information on the company).Navios Acquisition’s selected historical financial information and operating results for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, 2010, 2009 and for theperiod from March 14, 2008 (Inception) to December 31, 2008 were derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Navios Acquisition. Theconsolidated statement of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31,2012 and 2011 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The consolidated statementof operations data for the year ended December 31, 2009 and for the period from March 14, 2008 (Inception) to December 31, 2008, and the balance sheetdata as of December 31, 2010, 2009 and as of December 31, 2008, have been derived from our audited financial statements which are not included in thisdocument. The selected consolidated financial data should be read in conjunction with “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects”. theconsolidated financial statements, related notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this Annual Report. The information is only a summaryand should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report and section “Item 5.Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.” The selected consolidated financial data is a summary of, is derived from, and is qualified by reference to,our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles(“U.S. GAAP”). The historical data included below and elsewhere in this Annual Report is not necessarily indicative of our future performance. (In thousands of U.S. dollars) Year endedDecember 31,2012 Year endedDecember 31,2011 Year endedDecember 31,2010 Year endedDecember 31,2009 For the periodMarch 14, 2008(date of inception)to December 31,2008 Revenue $151,097 $121,925 $33,568 $— $— Time charter expenses (2,824) (3,499) (355) — — Direct vessel expenses (2,622) (633) — — — Management fees (47,043) (35,679) (9,752) — — General and administrative expenses (3,853) (4,241) (1,902) (994) (393) Share based compensation — — (2,140) — — Transaction costs — — (8,019) — — Depreciation and amortization (49,644) (38,638) (10,120) — — Prepayment penalties & write- off of deferred finance fees — (935) (5,441) — — Interest income 445 1,414 862 346 1,440 Interest expenses and finance cost, net (49,432) (43,165) (10,651) — — Other income/(expense), net 78 (406) 404 Net (loss)/income $(3,798) $(3,857) $(13,546) $(648) $1,047 Net (loss)/ income per share, basic $(0.08) $(0.08) $(0.43) $(0.03) $0.08 Net (loss)/ income per share, diluted $(0.08) $(0.08) $(0.43) $(0.02) $0.06 2 Table of ContentsBalance Sheet Data (at period end) Year EndedDecember 31,2012 Year endedDecember 31,2011 Year endedDecember 31,2010 Year endedDecember 31,2009 For the periodMarch 14, 2008(date of inception)to December 31,2008 Current assets, including cash 71,795 78,907 81,202 142 57 Vessels, net 940,738 774,624 529,659 — — Total assets 1,370,644 1,195,469 1,005,087 251,635 252,258 Current portion of long-term debt 19,724 11,928 5,086 — — Total long-term debt, excluding current portion 974,362 833,483 704,332 — — Redeemable Convertible Preferred Stock 6,000 — — — — Total Stockholders equity 225,304 238,849 253,728 141,990 100,289 Cash Flow Data Net cash provided by /(used in) operating activities 81,877 64,233 11,300 (623) 1,467 Net cash (used in)/provided by investing activities (205,956) (225,777) (103,602) 708 (252,201) Net cash provided by financing activities 125,625 141,484 154,575 — 250,736 Cash dividends declared per common share 0.20 0.20 0.05 — — Fleet Data: Vessels at end of period 19 14 9 — — B. Capitalization and indebtedness.Not applicable.C. Reasons for the offer and use of proceeds.Not applicable.D. Risk factorsRisks Relating to Our BusinessWe have a limited operating history, and you will have a limited basis on which to evaluate our ability to achieve our business objectives. We may notoperate profitably in the future.We are a company with limited combined operating results to date. Accordingly, you will have a limited basis upon which to evaluate our ability to achieveour business objectives. We completed our initial public offering (“IPO”) on July 1, 2008. Pursuant to the Acquisition Agreement dated April 8, 2010 andapproved by our stockholders on May 25, 2010 (the “Acquisition Agreement”), we completed the Product and Chemical Tanker Acquisition whichconstituted the initial business combination. Of the 13 vessels and the two purchase options that were exercised in July 2011, three were delivered during2010, one delivered during 2011, four delivered during 2012 and two delivered in January and February 2013 with the remaining vessels under theAcquisition Agreement scheduled to be delivered during 2013. Most of the vessels acquired with the Product and Chemical Tanker Acquisition have nooperating history, and the ten vessels delivered up to date have only been chartered since their respective delivery. On September 10, 2010, we completed theacquisition of seven very large crude carriers (“VLCC”), referred to herein as the VLCC Acquisition, with six operating vessels and one vessel delivered inour fleet in June 2011. On October 26, 2010, we entered into an agreement to acquire two newbuild vessels that were delivered in the fourth quarter of 2011and first quarter of 2012, respectively. Both of the vessels were immediately chartered. In July 2011, we took delivery of two MR2 product tankers, whichcontinue to trade under charters in place at the time of acquisition. In January 2012, Navios Acquisition concluded the asset acquisition of three newbuildMR2 product tankers scheduled to be delivered from a South Korean shipyard in the second, third and fourth quarters of 2014, respectively. 3 Table of ContentsDelays in deliveries of our newbuild vessels, or our decision to cancel, or our inability to otherwise complete the acquisitions of any newbuildings we maydecide to acquire in the future, could harm our operating results and lead to the termination of any related charters.Our newbuilding vessels, as well as any newbuildings we may contract to acquire or order in the future, could be delayed, not completed or cancelled, whichwould delay or eliminate our expected receipt of revenues under any charters for such vessels. The shipbuilder or third party seller could fail to deliver thenewbuilding vessel or any other vessels we acquire or order, or we could cancel a purchase or a newbuilding contract because the shipbuilder has not met itsobligations, including its obligation to maintain agreed refund guarantees in place for our benefit. For prolonged delays, the customer may terminate the timecharter.Our receipt of newbuildings could be delayed, cancelled, or otherwise not completed because of: • quality or engineering problems or failure to deliver the vessel in accordance with the vessel specifications; • changes in governmental regulations or maritime self-regulatory organization standards; • work stoppages or other labor disturbances at the shipyard; • bankruptcy or other financial or liquidity problems of the shipbuilder; • a backlog of orders at the shipyard; • political or economic disturbances in the country or region where the vessel is being built; • weather interference or catastrophic event, such as a major earthquake or fire; • shortages of or delays in the receipt of necessary equipment or construction materials, such as steel; and • our inability to finance the purchase of the vessel.If delivery of any newbuild vessel acquired, or any vessel we contract to acquire in the future is materially delayed, it could materially adversely affect ourresults of operations and financial condition.If we fail to manage our planned growth properly, we may not be able to expand our fleet successfully, which may adversely affect our overall financialposition.While we have no specific plans, we do intend to continue to expand our fleet in the future. Our growth will depend on: • locating and acquiring suitable vessels; • identifying reputable shipyards with available capacity and contracting with them for the construction of new vessels; • integrating any acquired vessels successfully with our existing operations; • enhancing our customer base; • managing our expansion; and • obtaining required financing, which could include debt, equity or combinations thereof.Additionally, the marine transportation and logistics industries are capital intensive, traditionally using substantial amounts of indebtedness to financevessel acquisitions, capital expenditures and working capital needs. If we finance the purchase of our vessels through the issuance of debt securities, it couldresult in: • default and foreclosure on our assets if our operating cash flow after a business combination or asset acquisition were insufficient to pay our debtobligations; • acceleration of our obligations to repay the indebtedness even if we have made all principal and interest payments when due if the debt securitycontained covenants that required the maintenance of certain financial ratios or reserves and any such covenant were breached without a waiveror renegotiation of that covenant; • our immediate payment of all principal and accrued interest, if any, if the debt security was payable on demand; and • our inability to obtain additional financing, if necessary, if the debt security contained covenants restricting our ability to obtain additionalfinancing while such security was outstanding.In addition, our business plan and strategy is predicated on buying vessels in a distressed market at what we believe is near the low end of the cycle in whathas typically been a cyclical industry. However, there is no assurance that charter rates and vessels asset values will not sink lower, or that there will be anupswing in shipping costs or vessel asset values in the near-term or at all, in which case our business plan and strategy may not succeed in the near-term or atall. Growing any business by acquisition presents numerous risks such as undisclosed liabilities and obligations, difficulty experienced in obtainingadditional qualified personnel and managing relationships with customers and suppliers and integrating newly acquired operations into existinginfrastructures. We may not be successful in growing and may incur significant expenses and losses. 4 Table of ContentsWe may not have adequate insurance to compensate us for damage to or loss of our vessels, which may have a material adverse effect on our financialcondition and results of operation.We procure hull and machinery insurance, protection and indemnity insurance, which includes environmental damage and pollution insurance coverage andwar risk insurance for our fleet. We do not maintain for our vessels insurance against loss of hire, which covers business interruptions that result from the lossof use of a vessel. We may not be adequately insured against all risks. We may not be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage for our fleet in the future.The insurers may not pay particular claims. Our insurance policies may contain deductibles for which we will be responsible and limitations and exclusionsthat may increase our costs or lower our revenue. Moreover, insurers may default on claims they are required to pay. If our insurance is not enough to coverclaims that may arise, the deficiency may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.We may face unexpected maintenance costs, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.If our vessels suffer damage or require upgrade work, they may need to be repaired at a drydocking facility. Our vessels may occasionally require upgradework in order to maintain their classification society rating or as a result of changes in regulatory requirements. In addition, our vessels will be off-hireperiodically for intermediate surveys and special surveys in connection with each vessel’s certification by its classification society. The costs of drydockrepairs are unpredictable and can be substantial and the loss of earnings while these vessels are being repaired and reconditioned, as well as the actual cost ofthese repairs, would decrease our earnings. Our insurance generally only covers a portion of drydocking expenses resulting from damage to a vessel andexpenses related to maintenance of a vessel will not be reimbursed. In addition, space at drydocking facilities is sometimes limited and not all drydockingfacilities are conveniently located. We may be unable to find space at a suitable drydocking facility on a timely basis or may be forced to move a damagedvessel to a drydocking facility that is not conveniently located to the vessel’s position. The loss of earnings while any of our vessels are forced to wait forspace or to relocate to drydocking facilities that are far away from the routes on which our vessels trade would further decrease our earnings.We rely on our technical managers to provide essential services to our vessels and run the day-to-day operations of our vessels.Pursuant to technical management agreements our current technical manager provides services essential to the business of our vessels, including vesselmaintenance, crewing, purchasing, shipyard supervision, insurance and assistance with vessel regulatory compliance. The current technical manager of theVLCC vessels, an affiliate of the seller of such vessels, is a technical ship management company that has provided technical management to the acquiredVLCC vessels prior to the consummation of the business combination. This technical manager will continue to provide such services for an interim periodsubsequent to the closing of the VLCC Acquisition, after which the technical management of our fleet is expected to be provided directly by a subsidiary ofNavios Holdings. However, in the event Navios Holdings does not obtain the required vetting approvals, it will not be able to take over technicalmanagement. Our operational success and ability to execute our strategy will depend significantly upon the satisfactory performance of these services by thecurrent technical manager, and, subsequently, by the Navios Holdings’ subsidiary. The failure of either of these technical managers to perform these servicessatisfactorily and/or the failure of the Navios Holdings’ subsidiary to garner the approvals necessary to become our technical manager for the VLCC vesselscould have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.Our vessels may be subject to unbudgeted periods of off-hire, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results ofoperations.Under the terms of the charter agreements under which our vessels operate, or are expected to operate in the case of the newbuildings, when a vessel is “off-hire,” or not available for service or otherwise deficient in its condition or performance, the charterer generally is not required to pay the hire rate, and we willbe responsible for all costs (including the cost of bunker fuel) unless the charterer is responsible for the circumstances giving rise to the lack of availability. Avessel generally will be deemed to be off-hire if there is an occurrence preventing the full working of the vessel due to, among other things: • operational deficiencies; • the removal of a vessel from the water for repairs, maintenance or inspection, which is referred to as drydocking; • equipment breakdowns; • delays due to accidents or deviations from course; • occurrence of hostilities in the vessel’s flag state or in the event of piracy; 5 Table of Contents • crewing strikes, labor boycotts, certain vessel detentions or similar problems; or • our failure to maintain the vessel in compliance with its specifications, contractual standards and applicable country of registry and internationalregulations or to provide the required crew.Risks Relating to Our IndustryThe cyclical nature of the tanker industry may lead to volatility in charter rates and vessel values, which could materially adversely affect our futureearnings.Oil has been one of the world’s primary energy sources for a number of decades. The global economic growth of previous years had a significant impact onthe demand for oil and subsequently on the oil trade and shipping demand. However, from the second half of 2008, through today, the world’s economiesexperienced a major economic slowdown and uncertainty with effects that are ongoing, the duration of which is very difficult to forecast is expected tocontinue to have, a significant impact on world trade, including the oil trade. If the tanker market, which has historically been cyclical, is depressed in thefuture, our earnings and available cash flow may be materially adversely affected. Our ability to employ our vessels profitably will depend upon, among otherthings, economic conditions in the tanker market. Fluctuations in charter rates and tanker values result from changes in the supply and demand for tankercapacity and changes in the supply and demand for liquid cargoes, including petroleum and petroleum products.Historically, the crude oil markets have been volatile as a result of the many conditions and events that can affect the price, demand, production and transportof oil, including competition from alternative energy sources. Decreased demand for oil transportation may have a material adverse effect on our revenues,cash flows and profitability. The factors affecting the supply and demand for tankers are outside of our control, and the nature, timing and degree of changesin industry conditions are unpredictable. The current global financial crisis has intensified this unpredictability.The factors that influence demand for tanker capacity include: • demand for and supply of liquid cargoes, including petroleum and petroleum products; • developments in international trade; • waiting days in ports; • changes in oil production and refining capacity and regional availability of petroleum refining capacity; • environmental and other regulatory developments; • global and regional economic conditions; • the distance chemicals, petroleum and petroleum products are to be moved by sea; • changes in seaborne and other transportation patterns, including changes in distances over which cargo is transported due to geographic changesin where oil is produced, refined and used; • competition from alternative sources of energy; • armed conflicts and terrorist activities; • political developments; and • embargoes and strikes.The factors that influence the supply of tanker capacity include: • the number of newbuilding deliveries; • the scrapping rate of older vessels; • port or canal congestion; • the number of vessels that are used for storage or as floating storage offloading service vessels; • the conversion of tankers to other uses, including conversion of vessels from transporting oil and oil products to carrying drybulk cargo and thereverse conversion; • availability of financing for new tankers; • the phasing out of single-hull tankers due to legislation and environmental concerns; • the price of steel; • the number of vessels that are out of service; • national or international regulations that may effectively cause reductions in the carrying capacity of vessels or early obsolescence of tonnage;and • environmental concerns and regulations.Furthermore, the extension of refinery capacity in India and particularly the Middle East through 2016 is expected to exceed the immediate consumption inthese areas, and an increase in exports of refined oil products is expected as a result. This coupled with announced refinery closures in North America, theCaribbean and Europe should increase trade in refined oil products. 6 Table of ContentsHistorically, the tanker markets have been volatile as a result of the many conditions and factors that can affect the price, supply and demand for tankercapacity. The recent global economic crisis may further reduce demand for transportation of oil over long distances and supply of tankers that carry oil,which may materially affect our future revenues, profitability and cash flows.We believe that the current order book for tanker vessels represents a significant percentage of the existing fleet; however the percentage of the fleet on orderas a percent of the total fleet declined from 2011 to 2012. An over-supply of tanker capacity may result in a reduction of charter hire rates. If a reduction incharter rates occurs, we may only be able to charter our vessels at unprofitable rates or we may not be able to charter these vessels at all, which could lead to amaterial adverse effect on our results of operations.Charter rates in the crude oil, product and chemical tanker sectors of the seaborne transportation industry in which we operate have significantly declinedfrom historically high levels in 2008 and may remain depressed or decline further in the future, which may adversely affect our earnings.Charter rates in the crude oil, product and chemical tanker sectors have significantly declined from historically high levels in 2008 and may remain depressedor decline further. For example, the Baltic Dirty Tanker Index declined from a high of 2,347 in July 2008 to 453 in mid-April 2009, which represents adecline of approximately 81%. Since January 2011 it has traded between a low of 604 and a high of 1,065; as of February 25, 2012, it stood at 683. TheBaltic Clean Tanker Index fell from 1,509 in the early summer of 2008 to 345 in April 2009, or approximately 77%. It has traded between a low of 553 and ahigh of 908 since January 2011 and stood at 688 as of February 25, 2012. Of note is that Chinese imports of crude oil have steadily increased from 3 millionbarrels per day in 2008 to about 5.9 million barrels per day in January 2013 and the US has steadily increased its total petroleum product exports to3.3 million barrels per day in November 2012 from 1 million barrels per day in January 2006. If the tanker sector of the seaborne transportation industry,which has been highly cyclical, is depressed in the future at a time when we may want to sell a vessel, our earnings and available cash flow may be adverselyaffected. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully charter our vessels in the future at rates sufficient to allow us to operate our businessprofitably or to meet our obligations, including payment of debt service to our lenders. Our ability to renew the charters on vessels that we may acquire in thefuture, the charter rates payable under any replacement charters and vessel values will depend upon, among other things, economic conditions in the sector inwhich our vessels operate at that time, changes in the supply and demand for vessel capacity and changes in the supply and demand for the seabornetransportation of energy resources and commodities.Spot market rates for tanker vessels are highly volatile and are currently at relatively low levels historically and may further decrease in the future, whichmay adversely affect our earnings in the event that our vessels are chartered in the spot market.We intend to deploy at least some of our product and chemical tankers in the spot market. Although spot chartering is common in the product and chemicaltanker sectors, product and chemical tanker charter hire rates are highly volatile and may fluctuate significantly based upon demand for seabornetransportation of crude oil and oil products and chemicals, as well as tanker supply. The world oil demand is influenced by many factors, includinginternational economic activity; geographic changes in oil production, processing, and consumption; oil price levels; inventory policies of the major oil andoil trading companies; and strategic inventory policies of countries such as the United States and China. The successful operation of our vessels in the spotcharter market depends upon, among other things, obtaining profitable spot charters and minimizing, to the extent possible, time spent waiting for chartersand time spent traveling unladen to pick up cargo. Furthermore, as charter rates for spot charters are fixed for a single voyage that may last up to severalweeks, during periods in which spot charter rates are rising, we will generally experience delays in realizing the benefits from such increases.The spot market is highly volatile, and, in the past, there have been periods when spot rates have declined below the operating cost of vessels. Currently,charter hire rates are at relatively low rates historically and there is no assurance that the crude oil, product and chemical tanker charter market will recoverover the next several months or will not continue to decline further.Additionally, if the spot market rates or short-term time charter rates become significantly lower than the time charter equivalent rates that some of ourcharterers are obligated to pay us under our existing charters, the charterers may have incentive to default under that charter or attempt to renegotiate thecharter. If our charterers fail to pay their obligations, we would have to attempt to re-charter our vessels at lower charter rates, which would affect our ability tocomply with our loan covenants and operate our vessels profitably. If we are not able to comply with our loan covenants and our lenders choose to accelerateour indebtedness and foreclose their liens, we could be required to sell vessels in our fleet and our ability to continue to conduct our business would beimpaired.Our VLCC vessels are contractually committed to time charters, with the remaining terms of these charters expiring during the period from and including2014 through 2026. We are not permitted to unilaterally terminate the charter agreements of 7 Table of Contentsthe VLCC vessels due to upswings in the tanker industry cycle, when spot market voyages might be more profitable. We may also decide to sell a vessel inthe future. In such a case, should we sell a vessel that is committed to a long-term charter, we may not be able to realize the full charter free fair market valueof the vessel during a period when spot market charters are more profitable than the charter agreement under which the vessel operates. We may re-charter theVLCC vessels on long-term charters or charter them in the spot market upon expiration or termination of the vessels’ current charters. If we are not able toemploy the VLCC vessels profitably under time charters or in the spot market, our results of operations and operating cash flow may suffer.Any decrease in shipments of crude oil from the Arabian Gulf or West Africa may materially adversely affect our financial performance.The demand for VLCC oil tankers derives primarily from demand for Arabian Gulf and West African crude oil, which, in turn, primarily depends on theeconomies of the world’s industrial countries and competition from alternative energy sources. A wide range of economic, social and other factors cansignificantly affect the strength of the world’s industrial economies and their demand for Arabian Gulf and West African crude oil.Among the factors that could lead to a decrease in demand for exported Arabian Gulf and West African crude oil are: • increased use of existing and future crude oil pipelines in the Arabian Gulf or West African regions; • a decision by the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (“OPEC”) to increase its crude oil prices or to further decrease or limit theircrude oil production; • armed conflict or acts of piracy in the Arabian Gulf or West Africa and political or other factors; • increased oil production in other regions, such as Russia and Latin America; and • the development and the relative costs of nuclear power, natural gas, coal and other alternative sources of energy.Any significant decrease in shipments of crude oil from the Arabian Gulf or West Africa may materially adversely affect our financial performance.Ten of the vessels we have acquired are second-hand vessels, and we may acquire more second-hand vessels in the future. The acquisition and operation ofsuch vessels may result in increased operating costs and vessel off-hire, which could materially adversely affect our earnings.Two of LR1 product tanker vessels, two of MR2 product tanker vessels and six of VLCC vessels that we have acquired are second-hand vessels, and we mayacquire more second-hand vessels in the future. Our inspection of second-hand vessels prior to purchase does not provide us with the same knowledge abouttheir condition and cost of any required or anticipated repairs that we would have had if these vessels had been built for and operated exclusively by us.Generally, we will not receive the benefit of warranties on second-hand vessels.In general, the costs to maintain a vessel in good operating condition increase with the age of the vessel. Due to improvements in engine technology, oldervessels are typically less fuel efficient and more costly to maintain than more recently constructed vessels. Cargo insurance rates increase with the age of avessel, making older vessels less desirable to charterers.Governmental regulations, safety or other equipment standards related to the age of vessels may require expenditures for alterations or the addition of newequipment, to our vessels and may restrict the type of activities in which the vessels may engage or the geographic regions in which we may operate. Wecannot predict what alterations or modifications our vessels may be required to undergo in the future. As our vessels age, market conditions may not justifythose expenditures or enable us to operate our vessels profitably during the remainder of their useful lives.Although we have considered the age and condition of the vessels in budgeting for operating, insurance and maintenance costs, we may encounter higheroperating and maintenance costs due to the age and condition of these vessels, or any additional vessels we acquire in the future. The age of some of theVLCC vessels may result in higher operating costs and increased vessel off-hire periods relative to our competitors that operate newer fleets, which couldhave a material adverse effect on our results of operations. 8 Table of ContentsOur growth depends on continued growth in demand for crude oil, refined petroleum products (clean and dirty) and bulk liquid chemicals and thecontinued demand for seaborne transportation of such cargoes.Our growth strategy focuses on expansion in the crude oil, product and chemical tanker sectors. Accordingly, our growth depends on continued growth inworld and regional demand for crude oil, refined petroleum (clean and dirty) products and bulk liquid chemicals and the transportation of such cargoes bysea, which could be negatively affected by a number of factors, including: • the economic and financial developments globally, including actual and projected global economic growth; • fluctuations in the actual or projected price of crude oil, refined petroleum (clean and dirty) products or bulk liquid chemicals; • refining capacity and its geographical location; • increases in the production of oil in areas linked by pipelines to consuming areas, the extension of existing, or the development of new, pipelinesystems in markets we may serve, or the conversion of existing non-oil pipelines to oil pipelines in those markets; • decreases in the consumption of oil due to increases in its price relative to other energy sources, other factors making consumption of oil lessattractive or energy conservation measures; • availability of new, alternative energy sources; and • negative or deteriorating global or regional economic or political conditions, particularly in oil-consuming regions, which could reduce energyconsumption or its growth.The refining and chemical industries may respond to the economic downturn and demand weakness by reducing operating rates partially or completelyclosing refineries and by reducing or cancelling certain investment expansion plans, including plans for additional refining capacity, in the case of therefining industry. Continued reduced demand for refined petroleum (clean and dirty) products and bulk liquid chemicals and the shipping of such cargoes orthe increased availability of pipelines used to transport refined petroleum (clean and dirty) products, would have a material adverse effect on our futuregrowth and could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition.Our growth depends on our ability to obtain customers, for which we face substantial competition. In the highly competitive tanker industry, we may not beable to compete for charters with new entrants or established companies with greater resources, which may adversely affect our results of operations.We will employ our tanker vessels in the highly competitive crude oil tanker sectors of the shipping industry that is capital intensive and fragmented.Competition arises primarily from other vessel owners, including major oil companies as well as independent tanker companies, some of whom havesubstantially greater resources and experience than us. Competition for the chartering of tankers can be intense and depends on price, location, size, age,condition and the acceptability of the vessel and its managers to the charterers. Such competition has been enhanced as a result of the downturn in theshipping industry, which has resulted in an excess supply of vessels and reduced charter rates.Medium- to long-term time charters and bareboat charters have the potential to provide income at pre-determined rates over more extended periods of time.However, the process for obtaining longer term time charters and bareboat charters is highly competitive and generally involves a lengthy, intensive andcontinuous screening and vetting process and the submission of competitive bids that often extends for several months. In addition to the quality, age andsuitability of the vessel, longer term shipping contracts tend to be awarded based upon a variety of other factors relating to the vessel operator. Competitionfor the transportation of crude oil, refined petroleum products (clean and dirty) and bulk liquid chemicals can be intense and depends on price, location, size,age, condition and acceptability of the vessel and our managers to the charterers.In addition to having to meet the stringent requirements set out by charterers, it is likely that we will also face substantial competition from a number ofcompetitors who may have greater financial resources, stronger reputations or experience than we do when we try to re-charter our vessels. It is also likely thatwe will face increased numbers of competitors entering into the crude oil, product and chemical tanker sectors, including in the ice class sector. Increasedcompetition may cause greater price competition, especially for medium- to long-term charters. Due in part to the highly fragmented markets, competitorswith greater resources could operate larger fleets through consolidations or acquisitions that may be able to offer better prices and fleets than ours.As a result of these factors, we may be unable to obtain customers for medium- to long-term time charters or bareboat charters on a profitable basis, if at all.Even if we are successful in employing our vessels under longer term time charters or bareboat charters, our vessels will not be available for trading in thespot market during an upturn in the crude oil, product and chemical tanker market cycles, when spot trading may be more profitable. If we cannotsuccessfully employ our vessels in profitable time charters our results of operations and operating cash flow could be adversely affected. 9 Table of ContentsThe market values of our vessels, which have declined from historically high levels, may fluctuate significantly, which could cause us to breach covenantsin our credit facilities and result in the foreclosure of certain of our vessels. Depressed vessel values could also cause us to incur impairment charges.Due to the sharp decline in world trade and tanker charter rates, the market values of our contracted new buildings and of tankers generally, are currentlysignificantly lower than prior to the downturn in the second half of 2008. Within the past year smaller product tanker yard resale prices have remained flat ordeclined slightly. Vessel values may remain at current low, or lower, levels for a prolonged period of time and can fluctuate substantially over time due to anumber of different factors, including: • prevailing level of charter rates; • general economic and market conditions affecting the shipping industry; • competition from other shipping companies; • types and sizes of vessels; • supply and demand for vessels; • other modes of transportation; • cost of newbuildings; • governmental or other regulations; and • technological advances.If the market value of our vessels decreases, we may breach some of the covenants contained in the financing agreements relating to our indebtedness at thetime. The credit facilities contain covenants including maximum total net liabilities over total net assets (effective in general after delivery of the vessels),minimum net worth and loan to value ratio covenants initially of 130% or lower, applicable after delivery of the vessels. If we breach any such covenants inthe future and we are unable to remedy the relevant breach, our lenders could accelerate our debt and foreclose on our vessels. In addition, if the book valueof a vessel is impaired due to unfavorable market conditions, we would incur a loss that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financialcondition and results of operations.In addition, as vessels grow older, they generally decline in value. We will review our vessels for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstancesindicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. We review certain indicators of potential impairment, such as undiscounted projectedoperating cash flows expected from the future operation of the vessels, which can be volatile for vessels employed on short-term charters or in the spotmarket. Any impairment charges incurred as a result of declines in charter rates would negatively affect our financial condition and results of operations. Inaddition, if we sell any vessel at a time when vessel prices have fallen and before we have recorded an impairment adjustment to our financial statements, thesale may be at less than the vessel’s carrying amount on our financial statements, resulting in a loss and a reduction in earnings.Future increases in vessel operating expenses, including rising fuel prices, could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results ofoperations.Under our time charter agreements, the charterer is responsible for substantially all of the voyage expenses, including port and canal charges and fuel costsand we are generally responsible for vessel operating expenses. Vessel operating expenses are the costs of operating a vessel, primarily consisting of crewwages and associated costs, insurance premiums, management fees, lubricants and spare parts and repair and maintenance costs. In particular, the cost of fuelis a significant factor in negotiating charter rates. As a result, an increase in the price of fuel beyond our expectations may adversely affect our profitability.The price and supply of fuel is unpredictable and fluctuates based on events outside our control, including geopolitical developments, supply and demandfor oil, actions by members of OPEC and other oil and gas producers, war, terrorism and unrest in oil producing countries and regions, regional productionpatterns and environmental concerns and regulations.We receive a daily rate for the use of our vessels, which is fixed through the term of the applicable charter agreement. Our charter agreements do not providefor any increase in the daily hire rate in the event that vessel-operating expenses increase during the term of the charter agreement. The charter agreements forthe seven VLCC vessels expire during the period from and including 2014 through 2026. Because of the long-term nature of these charter agreements,incremental increases in our vessel operating expenses over the term of a charter agreement will effectively reduce our operating income and, if such increasesin operating expenses are significant, adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.The crude oil, product and chemical tanker sectors are subject to seasonal fluctuations in demand and, therefore, may cause volatility in our operatingresults.The crude oil, product and chemical tanker sectors of the shipping industry have historically exhibited seasonal variations in demand and, as a result, incharter hire rates. This seasonality may result in quarter-to-quarter volatility in our operating results. The product and chemical tanker markets are typicallystronger in the fall and winter months in anticipation of increased consumption of oil and natural gas in the northern hemisphere. In addition, unpredictableweather patterns in these months tend to disrupt vessel scheduling and supplies of certain commodities. As a result, revenues are typically weaker during thefiscal quarters ended June 30 and September 30, and, conversely, typically stronger in fiscal quarters ended December 31 and March 31. Our operatingresults, therefore, may be subject to seasonal fluctuations. 10 Table of ContentsThe current global economic downturn may negatively impact our business.In recent years, there has been a significant adverse shift in the global economy, with operating businesses facing tightening credit, weakening demand forgoods and services, deteriorating international liquidity conditions, and declining markets. Lower demand for tanker cargoes as well as diminished tradecredit available for the delivery of such cargoes may create downward pressure on charter rates. If the current global economic environment persists orworsens, we may be negatively affected in the following ways: • We may not be able to employ our vessels at charter rates as favorable to us as historical rates or operate such vessels profitably. • The market value of our vessels could decrease significantly, which may cause us to recognize losses if any of our vessels are sold or if theirvalues are impaired. In addition, such a decline in the market value of our vessels could prevent us from borrowing under our credit facilities ortrigger a default under one of their covenants. • Charterers could have difficulty meeting their payment obligations to us.If the contraction of the global credit markets and the resulting volatility in the financial markets continues or worsens that could have a material adverseimpact on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows, and could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.The employment of our vessels could be adversely affected by an inability to clear the oil majors’ risk assessment process, and we could be in breach of ourcharter agreements with respect to the VLCC vessels.The shipping industry, and especially the shipment of crude oil, refined petroleum products (clean and dirty) and bulk liquid chemicals, has been, and willremain, heavily regulated. The so-called “oil majors” companies, such as Exxon Mobil, BP p.l.c., Royal Dutch Shell plc., Chevron, ConocoPhillips and TotalS.A. together with a number of commodities traders, represent a significant percentage of the production, trading and shipping logistics (terminals) of crudeoil and refined products worldwide. Concerns for the environment have led the oil majors to develop and implement a strict ongoing due diligence processwhen selecting their commercial partners. This vetting process has evolved into a sophisticated and comprehensive risk assessment of both the vesseloperator and the vessel, including physical ship inspections, completion of vessel inspection questionnaires performed by accredited inspectors and theproduction of comprehensive risk assessment reports. In the case of term charter relationships, additional factors are considered when awarding suchcontracts, including: • office assessments and audits of the vessel operator; • the operator’s environmental, health and safety record; • compliance with the standards of the International Maritime Organization (the “IMO”), a United Nations agency that issues international tradestandards for shipping; • compliance with heightened industry standards that have been set by several oil companies; • shipping industry relationships, reputation for customer service, technical and operating expertise; • shipping experience and quality of ship operations, including cost-effectiveness; • quality, experience and technical capability of crews; • the ability to finance vessels at competitive rates and overall financial stability; • relationships with shipyards and the ability to obtain suitable berths; • construction management experience, including the ability to procure on-time delivery of new vessels according to customer specifications; • willingness to accept operational risks pursuant to the charter, such as allowing termination of the charter for force majeure events; and • competitiveness of the bid in terms of overall price.Under the terms of our charter agreements, our charterers require that these vessels and the technical manager are vetted and approved to transport oilproducts by multiple oil majors. Our failure to maintain any of our vessels to the standards required by the oil majors could put us in breach of the applicablecharter agreement and lead to termination of such agreement, and could give rise to impairment in the value of our vessels.Should we not be able to successfully clear the oil majors’ risk assessment processes on an ongoing basis, the future employment of our vessels, as well as ourability to obtain charters, whether medium- or long-term, could be adversely affected. Such a situation may lead to the oil majors’ terminating existingcharters and refusing to use our vessels in the future, which would adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows. 11 Table of ContentsWe depend on significant customers for part of our revenue. Charterers may terminate or default on their obligations to us, which could materiallyadversely affect our results of operations and cash flow, and breaches of the charters may be difficult to enforce.We derive a significant part of our revenue from a number of charterers. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, DOSCO and STX Panocean Co. LTDaccounted for approximately 43.0% and 10.7%, respectively, of our total revenue. The loss of these or any of our customers, a customer’s failure to makepayments or perform under any of the applicable charters, a customer’s termination of any of the applicable charters, the loss or damage beyond repair to anyof our vessels, our failure to deliver the vessel within a fixed period of time or a decline in payments under the charters could have a material adverse effect onour business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, the charterers of the VLCC vessels are based in, and have their primary assets andoperations in, the Asia-Pacific region, including the People’s Republic of China. The charter agreements for the VLCC vessels are governed by English lawand provide for dispute resolution in English courts or London-based arbitral proceedings. There can be no assurance that we would be able to enforce anyjudgments against these charterers in jurisdictions where they are based or have their primary assets and operations. Even after a charter contract is entered,charterers may terminate charters early under certain circumstances. The events or occurrences that will cause a charter to terminate or give the charterer theoption to terminate the charter generally include a total or constructive total loss of the related vessel, the requisition for hire of the related vessel, the vesselbecoming subject to seizure for more than a specified number of days or the failure of the related vessel to meet specified performance criteria. In addition, theability of a charterer to perform its obligations under a charter will depend on a number of factors that are beyond our control.These factors may include general economic conditions, the condition of the crude oil, product and chemical tanker sectors of the shipping industry, thecharter rates received for specific types of vessels and various operating expenses. The costs and delays associated with the default by a charterer of a vesselmay be considerable and may adversely affect our business, results of operations, cash flows and financial condition.We cannot predict whether our charterers will, upon the expiration of their charters, re-charter our vessels on favorable terms or at all. If our charterers decidenot to re-charter our vessels, we may not be able to re-charter them on terms similar to our current charters or at all. In the future, we may also employ ourvessels on the spot charter market, which is subject to greater rate fluctuation than the time charter market. If we receive lower charter rates under replacementcharters or are unable to re-charter all of our vessels, our results of operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.If we experienced a catastrophic loss and our insurance is not adequate to cover such loss, it could lower our profitability and be detrimental tooperations.The ownership and operation of vessels in international trade is affected by a number of inherent risks, including mechanical failure, personal injury, vesseland cargo loss or damage, business interruption due to political conditions in foreign countries, hostilities, piracy, terrorism, labor strikes and/or boycotts,adverse weather conditions and catastrophic marine disaster, including environmental accidents and collisions. All of these risks could result in liability, lossof revenues, increased costs and loss of reputation. We maintain hull and machinery insurance, protection and indemnity insurance, which includeenvironmental damage and pollution and war risk insurance, consistent with industry standards, against these risks on our vessels and other business assets.However, we cannot assure you that we will be able to insure against all risks adequately, that any particular claim will be paid out of our insurance, or thatwe will be able to procure adequate insurance coverage at commercially reasonable rates in the future. Our insurers also require us to pay certain deductibleamounts, before they will pay claims, and insurance policies may contain limitations and exclusions, which, although we believe will be standard for theshipping industry, may nevertheless increase our costs and lower our profitability. Additionally, any increase in environmental and other regulations mayalso result in increased costs for, or the lack of availability of, insurance against the risks of environmental damage, pollution and other claims. Our inabilityto obtain insurance sufficient to cover potential claims or the failure of insurers to pay any significant claims could lower our profitability and be detrimentalto our operations.Furthermore, even if insurance coverage is adequate to cover our losses, we may not be able to timely obtain a replacement ship in the event of a loss. Wemay also be subject to calls, or premiums, in amounts based not only on our own claim records but also the claim records of all other members of theprotection and indemnity associations through which we receive indemnity insurance coverage for tort liability. In addition, our protection and indemnityassociations may not have enough resources to cover claims made against them. Our payment of these calls could result in significant expenses to us, whichcould reduce our cash flows and place strains on our liquidity and capital resources. 12 Table of ContentsWe are subject to various laws, regulations and conventions, including environmental and safety laws that could require significant expenditures both tomaintain compliance with such laws and to pay for any uninsured environmental liabilities including any resulting from a spill or other environmentalincident.The shipping business and vessel operation are materially affected by government regulation in the form of international conventions, national, state andlocal laws, and regulations in force in the jurisdictions in which vessels operate, as well as in the country or countries of their registration. Governmentalregulations, safety or other equipment standards, as well as compliance with standards imposed by maritime self-regulatory organizations and customerrequirements or competition, may require us to make capital and other expenditures. Because such conventions, laws and regulations are often revised, wecannot predict the ultimate cost of complying with such conventions, laws and regulations, or the impact thereof on the fair market price or useful life of ourvessels. In order to satisfy any such requirements, we may be required to take any of our vessels out of service for extended periods of time, withcorresponding losses of revenues. In the future, market conditions may not justify these expenditures or enable us to operate our vessels, particularly oldervessels, profitably during the remainder of their economic lives. This could lead to significant asset write downs. In addition, violations of environmental andsafety regulations can result in substantial penalties and, in certain instances, seizure or detention of our vessels.Additional conventions, laws and regulations may be adopted that could limit our ability to do business, require capital expenditures or otherwise increaseour cost of doing business, which may materially adversely affect our operations, as well as the shipping industry generally. For example, in variousjurisdictions legislation has been enacted, or is under consideration, that would impose more stringent requirements on air pollution and water dischargesfrom our vessels. For example, the International Maritime Organization (“IMO”) periodically proposes and adopts amendments to revise the InternationalConvention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (“MARPOL”), such as the revision to Annex VI which came into force on July 1, 2010. The revisedAnnex VI implements a phased reduction of the sulfur content of fuel and allows for stricter sulfur limits in designated emission control areas (“ECAs”). Thusfar, ECAs have been formally adopted for the Baltic Sea and the North Sea including the English Channel. The North American ECA came into effect fromAugust 1, 2012, and the United States Caribbean Sea ECA will come into force on January 1, 2013, having effect from January 1, 2014. These ECAs will limitSOx, NOx and particulate matter emissions. California has adopted more stringent low sulfur fuel requirements within California-regulated waters. Inaddition, the IMO, the U.S. and states within the U.S. have proposed or implemented requirements relating to the management of ballast water to prevent theharmful effects of foreign invasive species.The operation of vessels is also affected by the requirements set forth in the International Safety Management (“ISM”) Code. The ISM Code requiresshipowners and bareboat charterers to develop and maintain an extensive “Safety Management System” that includes the adoption of a safety andenvironmental protection policy setting forth instructions and procedures for safe vessel operation and describing procedures for dealing with emergencies.Further to this, the IMO has introduced the first ever mandatory measures for an international greenhouse gas reduction regime for a global industry sector.The Energy Efficiency measures took effect on January 1, 2013 and apply to all ships of 400 gross tonnage and above. They include the development of aship energy efficiency management plan (“SEEMP”) which is akin to a safety management plan, which the industry will have to comply with. The failure of aship owner or bareboat charterer to comply with the ISM Code and IMO measures may subject such party to increased liability, may decrease availableinsurance coverage for the affected vessels, and may result in a denial of access to, or detention in, certain ports.We operate a fleet of crude, product and chemical tankers that are subject to national and international laws governing pollution from such vessels. Severalinternational conventions impose and limit pollution liability from vessels. An owner of a tanker vessel carrying a cargo of “persistent oil” as defined by theInternational Convention for Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage (the “CLC”) is subject under the convention to strict liability for any pollution damagecaused in a contracting state by an escape or discharge from cargo or bunker tanks. This liability is subject to a financial limit calculated by reference to thetonnage of the ship, and the right to limit liability may be lost if the spill is caused by the shipowner’s intentional or reckless conduct. Liability may also beincurred under the CLC for a bunker spill from the vessel even when she is not carrying such cargo, but is in ballast.When a tanker is carrying clean oil products that do not constitute “persistent oil” that would be covered under the CLC, liability for any pollution damagewill generally fall outside the CLC and will depend on other international conventions or domestic laws in the jurisdiction where the spillage occurs. Thesame principle applies to any pollution from the vessel in a jurisdiction which is not a party to the CLC. The CLC applies in over 100 jurisdictions aroundthe world, but it does not apply in the United States, where the corresponding liability laws such as the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (The “OPA”) discussedbelow, are particularly stringent.For vessel operations not covered by the CLC, including those operated under our fleet, at present, international liability for oil pollution is governed by theInternational Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage (the “Bunker Convention”). In 2001, the IMO adopted the Bunker Convention,which imposes strict liability on shipowners for pollution damage and response costs incurred in contracting states caused by discharges, or threateneddischarges, of bunker oil from all classes of ships not covered by the CLC. The Bunker Convention also requires registered owners of ships over a certain sizeto maintain insurance to cover their liability for pollution damage in an amount equal to the limits of liability under the applicable national or internationallimitation regime, including liability limits calculated in accordance with the Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims 1976, as amended(the “1976 Convention”), discussed in more detail in the 13 Table of Contentsfollowing paragraph. The Bunker Convention became effective in contracting states on November 21, 2008 and as of January 31, 2013 was in effect in68 states. In non-contracting states, liability for such bunker oil pollution typically is determined by the national or other domestic laws in the jurisdictionwhere the spillage occurs.The CLC and Bunker Convention also provide vessel owners a right to limit their liability, depending on the applicable national or international regime. TheCLC includes its own liability limits. The 1976 Convention is the most widely applicable international regime limiting maritime pollution liability. Rightsto limit liability under the 1976 Convention are forfeited where a spill is caused by a shipowner’s intentional or reckless conduct. Certain jurisdictions haveratified the IMO’s Protocol of 1996 to the 1976 Convention, referred to herein as the “Protocol of 1996.” The Protocol of 1996 provides for substantiallyhigher liability limits in those jurisdictions than the limits set forth in the 1976 Convention. Finally, some jurisdictions, such as the United States, are not aparty to either the 1976 Convention or the Protocol of 1996, and, therefore, a shipowner’s rights to limit liability for maritime pollution in such jurisdictionsmay be uncertain.Environmental legislation in the United States merits particular mention as it is in many respects more onerous than international laws, representing a high-water mark of regulation with which ship owners and operators must comply, and of liability likely to be incurred in the event of non-compliance or anincident causing pollution. Such regulation may become even stricter if laws are changed as a result of the April 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill in the Gulfof Mexico. In the United States, the OPA establishes an extensive regulatory and liability regime for the protection and cleanup of the environment fromcargo and bunker oil spills from vessels, including tankers. The OPA covers all owners and operators whose vessels trade in the United States, its territoriesand possessions or whose vessels operate in United States waters, which includes the United States’ territorial sea and its 200 nautical mile exclusiveeconomic zone. Under the OPA, vessel owners, operators and bareboat charterers are “responsible parties” and are jointly, severally and strictly liable (unlessthe spill results solely from the act or omission of a third party, an act of God or an act of war) for all containment and clean-up costs and other damagesarising from discharges or substantial threats of discharges, of oil from their vessels. In response to the 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil incident in the Gulf ofMexico, the U.S. House of Representatives passed and the U.S. Senate considered but did not pass a bill to strengthen certain requirements of the OPA;similar legislation may be introduced in the future 112th Congress.In addition to potential liability under the federal OPA, vessel owners may in some instances incur liability on an even more stringent basis under state law inthe particular state where the spillage occurred. For example, California regulations prohibit the discharge of oil, require an oil contingency plan be filed withthe state, require that the ship owner contract with an oil response organization and require a valid certificate of financial responsibility, all prior to the vesselentering state waters.In the last decade, the EU has become increasingly active in the field of regulation of maritime safety and protection of the environment. In some areas ofregulation the EU has introduced new laws without attempting to procure a corresponding amendment to international law. Notably, the EU adopted in 2005a directive, as amended in 2009, on ship-source pollution, imposing criminal sanctions for pollution not only where pollution is caused by intent orrecklessness (which would be an offence under MARPOL), but also where it is caused by “serious negligence.” The concept of “serious negligence” may beinterpreted in practice to be little more than ordinary negligence. The directive could therefore result in criminal liability being incurred in circumstanceswhere it would not be incurred under international law. Criminal liability for a pollution incident could not only result in us incurring substantial penalties orfines, but may also, in some jurisdictions, facilitate civil liability claims for greater compensation than would otherwise have been payable.We maintain insurance coverage for each owned vessel in our fleet against pollution liability risks in the amount of $1.0 billion in the aggregate for any oneevent. The insured risks include penalties and fines as well as civil liabilities and expenses resulting from accidental pollution. However, this insurancecoverage is subject to exclusions, deductibles and other terms and conditions. If any liabilities or expenses fall within an exclusion from coverage, or ifdamages from a catastrophic incident exceed the aggregate liability of $1.0 billion for any one event, our cash flow, profitability and financial positionwould be adversely impacted.Please also refer to “Item 4. Information on the Company” for a more detailed discussion of Governmental and Other Regulations.Climate change and government laws and regulations related to climate change could negatively impact our financial condition.We are and will be, directly and indirectly, subject to the effects of climate change and may, directly or indirectly, be affected by government laws andregulations related to climate change. A number of countries have adopted or are considering the adoption of regulatory frameworks to reduce greenhousegas emissions, such as carbon dioxide and methane. In the United States, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“U.S. EPA”) has declaredgreenhouse gases to be 14 Table of Contentsdangerous pollutants and has issued greenhouse gas reporting requirements for emissions sources in certain industries (which do not include the shippingindustry). The U.S. EPA is also considering petitions to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from marine vessels.In addition, while the emissions of greenhouse gases from international shipping are not subject to the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations FrameworkConvention on Climate Change, which requires adopting countries to implement national programs to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, the IMO intends todevelop limits on greenhouse gases from international shipping. It has responded to the global focus on climate change and greenhouse gas emissions bydeveloping specific technical and operational efficiency measures and a work plan for market-based mechanisms in 2011. These include the mandatorymeasures of the ship energy efficiency management plan (“SEEMP”), outlined above, and an energy efficiency design index (“EEDI”) for new ships. TheIMO is also considering its position on market-based measures through an expert working group, which was expected to report back to its MarineEnvironment Protection Committee in late 2012. Among the numerous proposals being considered by the working group are the following: a port state levybased on the amount of fuel consumed by the vessel on its voyage to the port in question; a global emissions trading scheme which would allocate emissionsallowances and set an emissions cap; and an international fund establishing a global reduction target for international shipping, to be set either by theUNFCCC or the IMO. At its 64th session in October 2012, the MEPC indicated that 2015 was the target year for Member States to identify market-basedmeasures for international shipping.In December 2011, UN climate change talks took place in Durban and concluded with an agreement referred to as the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action.The Durban Conference did not result in any proposals specifically addressing the shipping industry’s role in climate change but the progress that has beenmade by the IMO in this area was widely acknowledged throughout the negotiating bodies of the UNFCCC process.The European Union announced in April 2007 that it planned to expand the European Union emissions trading scheme by adding vessels, and a proposalfrom the European Commission was expected if no global regime for reduction of seaborne emissions had been agreed to by the end of 2011. That deadlinehas now expired and it remains to be seen what position the EU takes in this regard in the period ahead. As of January 31, 2013 the Commission has stoppedshort of proposing that emissions from ships be included in the EU’s emissions-trading scheme (ETS). However, on October 1, 2012 it announced that itwould propose measures to monitor verify and report on greenhouse-gas emissions from the shipping sector in early 2013. This may be seen as indicative ofan intention to maintain pressure on the international negotiating process.We cannot predict with any degree of certainty what effect, if any, possible climate change and government laws and regulations related to climate changewill have on our operations, whether directly or indirectly. However, we believe that climate change, including the possible increase in severe weather eventsresulting from climate change, and government laws and regulations related to climate change may affect, directly or indirectly, (i) the cost of the vessels wemay acquire in the future, (ii) our ability to continue to operate as we have in the past, (iii) the cost of operating our vessels, and (iv) insurance premiums,deductibles and the availability of coverage. As a result, our financial condition could be negatively impacted by significant climate change and relatedgovernmental regulation, and that impact could be material.Please also refer to “Item 4. Information on the Company” for a more detailed discussion of Governmental and Other Regulations.We are subject to vessel security regulations and we incur costs to comply with adopted regulations. We may be subject to costs to comply with similarregulations that may be adopted in the future in response to terrorism.Since the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, there have been a variety of initiatives intended to enhance vessel security. On November 25, 2002, theMaritime Transportation Security Act of 2002, or MTSA, came into effect. To implement certain portions of the MTSA, in July 2003, the U.S. Coast Guardissued regulations requiring the implementation of certain security requirements aboard vessels operating in waters subject to the jurisdiction of the UnitedStates. Similarly, in December 2002, amendments to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea, or SOLAS, created a new chapter of theconvention dealing specifically with maritime security. The new chapter went into effect in July 2004, and imposes various detailed security obligations onvessels and port authorities, most of which are contained in the International Ship and Port Facilities Security (ISPS) Code. Among the various requirementsare: • on-board installation of automatic information systems, or AIS, to enhance vessel-to-vessel and vessel-to-shore communications; • on-board installation of ship security alert systems; • the development of vessel security plans; and • compliance with flag state security certification requirements. 15 Table of ContentsThe U.S. Coast Guard regulations, intended to be aligned with international maritime security standards, exempt non-U.S. vessels from MTSA vessel securitymeasures, provided such vessels have on board a valid International Ship Security Certificate (ISSC) that attests to the vessel’s compliance with SOLASsecurity requirements and the ISPS Code. We will implement the various security measures addressed by the MTSA, SOLAS and the ISPS Code and takemeasures for our vessels or vessels that we charter to attain compliance with all applicable security requirements within the prescribed time periods. Althoughmanagement does not believe these additional requirements will have a material financial impact on our operations, there can be no assurance that there willnot be an interruption in operations to bring vessels into compliance with the applicable requirements and any such interruption could cause a decrease incharter revenues. Furthermore, additional security measures could be required in the future that could have significant financial impact on us.Our international activities increase the compliance risks associated with economic and trade sanctions imposed by the United States, the European Unionand other jurisdictions.Our international operations could expose us to trade and economic sanctions or other restrictions imposed by the United States or other governments ororganizations, including the United Nations, the European Union and its member countries. Under economic and trading sanctions laws, governments mayseek to impose modifications to business practices, and modifications to compliance programs, which may increase compliance costs, and may subject us tofines, penalties and other sanctions.During 2011 and continuing into 2012, the scope of sanctions imposed against the government of Iran and persons engaging in certain activities or doingcertain business with and relating to Iran has been expanded by a number of jurisdictions, including the United States, the European Union and Canada. In2010, the U.S. enacted the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions Accountability and Divestment Act (“CISADA”), which expanded the scope of the former IranSanctions Act. Among other things, CISADA expands the application of the prohibitions to non-U.S. companies, such as our company, and introduces limitson the ability of companies and persons to do business or trade with Iran when such activities relate to the investment, supply or export of refined petroleumor petroleum products (our tankers have called on ports in Iran but do not engage in the activities specifically identified by these sanctions). Although webelieve that we are in compliance with all applicable sanctions and embargo laws and regulations, and intend to maintain such compliance, there can be noassurance that we will be in compliance in the future, particularly as the scope of certain laws may be unclear and may be subject to changinginterpretations. Moreover, our charterers may violate applicable sanctions and embargo laws and regulations as a result of actions that do not involve us orour vessels, and those violations could in turn negatively affect our reputation.We are monitoring developments in the United States, the European Union and other jurisdictions that maintain sanctions programs, including developmentsin implementation and enforcement of such sanctions programs. Expansion of sanctions programs, embargoes and other restrictions in the future (includingadditional designations of countries subject to sanctions), or modifications in how existing sanctions are interpreted or enforced, could prevent our tankersfrom calling on ports in sanctioned countries or could limit their cargoes. If any of the risks described above materialize, it could have a material adverseimpact on our business and results of operations.Increased inspection procedures and tighter import and export controls could increase costs and disrupt our business.International shipping is subject to various security and customs inspections and related procedures in countries of origin and destination. Inspectionprocedures can result in the seizure of contents of vessels, delays in the loading, offloading or delivery and the levying of customs, duties, fines and otherpenalties.It is possible that changes to inspection procedures could impose additional financial and legal obligations on us. Furthermore, changes to inspectionprocedures could also impose additional costs and obligations on our future customers and may, in certain cases, render the shipment of certain types of cargoimpractical. Any such changes or developments may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.A failure to pass inspection by classification societies could result in our vessels becoming unemployable unless and until they pass inspection, resulting ina loss of revenues from such vessels for that period and a corresponding decrease in operating cash flows.The hull and machinery of every commercial vessel must be classed by a classification society authorized by its country of registry. The classification societycertifies that a vessel is safe and seaworthy in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations of the country of registry of the vessel and with SOLAS. Avessel must undergo an annual survey, an intermediate survey and a special survey. In lieu of a special survey, a vessel’s machinery may be on a continuoussurvey cycle, under which the machinery would be surveyed periodically over a five-year period. Every vessel is also required to be drydocked every two tothree years for inspection of the underwater parts of such vessel. If any of our vessels fail any annual survey, intermediate survey, or special survey, the vesselmay be unable to trade between ports and, therefore, would be unemployable, potentially causing a negative impact on our revenues due to the loss ofrevenues from such vessel until it was able to trade again. 16 Table of ContentsThe operation of ocean-going vessels entails the possibility of marine disasters including damage or destruction of a vessel due to accident, the loss of avessel due to piracy, terrorism or political conflict, damage or destruction of cargo and similar events that are inherent operational risks of the tankerindustry and may cause a loss of revenue from affected vessels and damage to our business reputation and condition, which may in turn lead to loss ofbusiness.The operation of ocean-going vessels entails certain inherent risks that may adversely affect our business and reputation. Our vessels and their cargoes are atrisk of being damaged or lost due to events such as: • damage or destruction of vessel due to marine disaster such as a collision; • the loss of a vessel due to piracy and terrorism; • cargo and property losses or damage as a result of the foregoing or less drastic causes such as human error, mechanical failure and bad weather; • environmental accidents as a result of the foregoing; • business interruptions and delivery delays caused by mechanical failure, human error, acts of piracy, war, terrorism, political action in variouscountries, stowaways, labor strikes, potential government expropriation of our vessels or adverse weather conditions; and • other events and circumstances.In addition, increased operational risks arise as a consequence of the complex nature of the crude oil, product and chemical tanker industry, the nature ofservices required to support the industry, including maintenance and repair services, and the mechanical complexity of the tankers themselves. Compared toother types of vessels, tankers are exposed to a higher risk of damage and loss by fire, whether ignited by a terrorist attack, collision or other cause, due to thehigh flammability and high volume of the oil transported in tankers. Damage and loss could also arise as a consequence of a failure in the services required tosupport the industry, for example, due to inadequate dredging. Inherent risks also arise due to the nature of the product transported by our vessels. Anydamage to, or accident involving, our vessels while carrying crude oil could give rise to environmental damage or lead to other adverse consequences. Eachof these inherent risks may also result in death or injury to persons, loss of revenues or property, higher insurance rates, damage to our customer relationships,delay or rerouting.Any of these circumstances or events could substantially increase our costs. For example, the costs of replacing a vessel or cleaning up environmentaldamage could substantially lower our revenues by taking vessels out of operation permanently or for periods of time. Furthermore, the involvement of ourvessels in a disaster or delays in delivery, damage or the loss of cargo may harm our reputation as a safe and reliable vessel operator and cause us to losebusiness. Our vessels could be arrested by maritime claimants, which could result in the interruption of business and decrease revenue and lower profitability.Some of these inherent risks could result in significant damage, such as marine disaster or environmental incidents, and any resulting legal proceedings maybe complex, lengthy, costly and, if decided against us, any of these proceedings or other proceedings involving similar claims or claims for substantialdamages may harm our reputation and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, cash flow and financial position. In addition, thelegal systems and law enforcement mechanisms in certain countries in which we operate may expose us to risk and uncertainty. Further, we may be requiredto devote substantial time and cost defending these proceedings, which could divert attention from management of our business. Crew members, tortclaimants, claimants for breach of certain maritime contracts, vessel mortgagees, suppliers of goods and services to a vessel, shippers of cargo and otherpersons may be entitled to a maritime lien against a vessel for unsatisfied debts, claims or damages, and in many circumstances a maritime lien holder mayenforce its lien by “arresting” a vessel through court processes. Additionally, in certain jurisdictions, such as South Africa, under the “sister ship” theory ofliability, a claimant may arrest not only the vessel with respect to which the claimant’s lien has arisen, but also any “associated” vessel owned or controlledby the legal or beneficial owner of that vessel. If any vessel ultimately owned and operated by us is “arrested,” this could result in a material loss of revenues,or require us to pay substantial amounts to have the “arrest” lifted.Any of these factors may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial conditions and results of operations.The smuggling of drugs or other contraband onto our vessels may lead to governmental claims against us.We expect that our vessels will call in ports in South America and other areas where smugglers attempt to hide drugs and other contraband on vessels, with orwithout the knowledge of crew members. To the extent our vessels are found with contraband, whether inside or attached to the hull of our vessel and whetherwith or without the knowledge of any of our crew, we may face governmental or other regulatory claims which could have an adverse effect on our business,results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. 17 Table of ContentsActs of piracy on ocean-going vessels have increased in frequency and magnitude, which could adversely affect our business.The shipping industry has historically been affected by acts of piracy in regions such as the South China Sea and the Gulf of Aden. In 2009 acts of piracy sawa steep rise, particularly off the coast of Somalia in the Gulf of Aden. A recent and significant example of the heightened level of piracy came in February2011 when the M/V Irene SL, a crude oil tanker and the Arabian Sea which was not affiliated with us, was captured by pirates in the Arabian Sea whilecarrying crude oil estimated to be worth approximately $200 million. In December 2009, the Navios Apollon, a vessel owned by our affiliate, NaviosMaritime Partners L.P. (“Navios Partners”), was seized by pirates 800 miles off the coast of Somalia while transporting fertilizer from Tampa, Florida to Rozi,India and was released on February 27, 2010. These piracy attacks resulted in regions (in which our vessels are deployed) being characterized by insurers as“war risk” zones or Joint War Committee (JWC) “war and strikes” listed areas, premiums payable for such insurance coverage could increase significantly andsuch insurance coverage may be more difficult to obtain. Crew costs, including those due to employing onboard security guards, could increase in suchcircumstances. In addition, while we believe the charterer remains liable for charter payments when a vessel is seized by pirates, the charterer may dispute thisand withhold charter hire until the vessel is released. A charterer may also claim that a vessel seized by pirates was not “on-hire” for a certain number of daysand it is therefore entitled to cancel the charter party, a claim that we would dispute. We may not be adequately insured to cover losses from these incidents,which could have a material adverse effect on us. In addition, detention hijacking as a result of an act of piracy against our vessels, or an increase in cost, orunavailability of insurance for our vessels, could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.Acts of piracy on ocean-going vessels have increased in frequency, which could adversely affect our business and operations.Terrorist attacks, increased hostilities or war could lead to further economic instability, increased costs and disruption of our business.Terrorist attacks, such as the attacks in the United States on September 11, 2001 and the United States’ continuing response to these attacks, the attacks inLondon on July 7, 2005, as well as the threat of future terrorist attacks, continue to cause uncertainty in the world financial markets, including the energymarkets. The continuing conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan and other current and future conflicts, may adversely affect our business, operating results,financial condition, ability to raise capital and future growth. Continuing hostilities in the Middle East may lead to additional armed conflicts or to furtheracts of terrorism and civil disturbance in the United States or elsewhere, which may contribute further to economic instability.In addition, oil facilities, shipyards, vessels, pipelines and oil and gas fields could be targets of future terrorist attacks. Any such attacks could lead to, amongother things, bodily injury or loss of life, vessel or other property damage, increased vessel operational costs, including insurance costs, and the inability totransport oil and other refined products to or from certain locations. Terrorist attacks, war or other events beyond our control that adversely affect thedistribution, production or transportation of oil and other refined products to be shipped by us could entitle our customers to terminate our charter contracts,which would harm our cash flow and our business.Terrorist attacks on vessels, such as the October 2002 attack on the M/V Limburg, a very large crude carrier not related to us, may in the future alsonegatively affect our operations and financial condition and directly impact our vessels or our customers. Future terrorist attacks could result in increasedvolatility and turmoil in the financial markets in the United States and globally. Any of these occurrences could have a material adverse impact on ourrevenues and costs.Governments could requisition vessels of a target business during a period of war or emergency, resulting in a loss of earnings.A government could requisition a business’ vessels for title or hire. Requisition for title occurs when a government takes control of a vessel and becomes herowner, while requisition for hire occurs when a government takes control of a vessel and effectively becomes her charterer at dictated charter rates. Generally,requisitions occur during periods of war or emergency, although governments may elect to requisition vessels in other circumstances. Although a targetbusiness would be entitled to compensation in the event of a requisition of any of its vessels, the amount and timing of payment would be uncertain. 18 Table of ContentsDisruptions in world financial markets and the resulting governmental action in Europe, the United States and in other parts of the world could have amaterial adverse impact on our ability to obtain financing required to acquire vessels or new businesses. Furthermore, such a disruption would adverselyaffect our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.Concerns relating to the European sovereign debt crisis have recently intensified. While Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Spain and Cyprus have been the mostaffected countries thus far, with each agreeing to a rescue package with the European Union and the International Monetary Fund, there are fears that otherEuropean countries may be further affected by increasing public debt burdens and weakening economic growth prospects. On January 13, 2012, Standard andPoor’s Rating Services downgraded the long-term credit ratings for nine Eurozone nations, including France, Italy and Spain. On February 13, 2012, Moody’sInvestors Service (“Moody’s”) downgraded the sovereign debt ratings of Italy, Malta, Portugal, Slovakia, Slovenia and Spain, while initiating negativeoutlooks on the United Kingdom, France and Austria. Additionally, on March 2, 2012, Moody’s downgraded Greece’s sovereign debt rating to C from Ca.Since then, Standard and Poor’s, Moody’s Investors Service and other credit ratings agencies have further downgraded certain Eurozone nations, mostrecently with Fitch Ratings’ downgrade of Italy’s sovereign credit rating on March 8, 2013. Such downgrades could negatively affect those countries’ abilityto access the public debt markets at reasonable rates or at all, materially affecting the financial conditions of banks in those countries, including those withwhich we maintain cash deposits and equivalents, or on which we rely on to finance our vessel and new business acquisitions. Cash deposits and cashequivalents in excess of amounts covered by government-provided insurance are exposed to loss in the event of non-performance by financial institutions.We maintain cash deposits and equivalents in excess of government-provided insurance limits at banks in Greek and other European banks, which mayexpose us to a loss of cash deposits or cash equivalents.Furthermore, the United States and other parts of the world are exhibiting volatile economic trends and were recently in a recession. Despite signs of recovery,the outlook for the world economy remains uncertain. For example, the credit markets worldwide and in the U.S. have experienced significant contraction,de-leveraging and reduced liquidity, and the U.S. federal government, state governments and foreign governments have implemented and are considering abroad variety of governmental action and/or new regulation of the financial markets. Securities and futures markets and the credit markets are subject tocomprehensive statutes, regulations and other requirements. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), other regulators, self-regulatoryorganizations and exchanges are authorized to take extraordinary actions in the event of market emergencies, and may effect changes in law or interpretationsof existing laws. Recently, a number of financial institutions have experienced serious financial difficulties and, in some cases, have entered bankruptcyproceedings or are in regulatory enforcement actions. These issues, along with the reprising of credit risk and the difficulties currently experienced byfinancial institutions have made, and will likely continue to make, it difficult to obtain financing. As a result of the disruptions in the credit markets, manylenders have increased margins on lending rates, enacted tighter lending standards, required more restrictive terms (including higher collateral ratios foradvances, shorter maturities and smaller loan amounts), or have refused to refinance existing debt at all. Additionally, certain banks that have historicallybeen significant lenders to the shipping industry have reduced or ceased lending activities in the shipping industry. New banking regulations, includinglarger capital requirements and the resulting policies adopted by lenders, could reduce lending activities. We may experience difficulties obtaining financingcommitments, including commitments to refinance our existing debt as balloon payments come due under our credit facilities, in the future if lenders areunwilling to extend financing to us or unable to meet their funding obligations due to their own liquidity, capital or solvency issues. Due to the fact that wewould possibly cover all or a portion of the cost of any new vessel acquisition with debt financing, such uncertainty, combined with restrictions imposed byour current debt, could hamper our ability to finance vessels or new business acquisitions.In addition, economic uncertainty worldwide has markedly reduced demand for shipping services and has decreased charter rates, which may adversely affectour results of operations and financial condition. Currently, the economies of China, Japan, other Pacific Asian countries and India are the main driving forcebehind the development in seaborne transportation. Reduced demand from such economies has driven decreased rates and vessel values.We could face risks attendant to changes in economic environments, changes in interest rates, and instability in certain securities markets, among otherfactors. Major market disruptions and the uncertainty in market conditions and the regulatory climate in the U.S., Europe and worldwide could adversely ourbusiness or impair our ability to borrow amounts under any future financial arrangements. The current market conditions may last longer than we anticipate.These recent and developing economic and governmental factors could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cashflows.Because international tanker companies often generate most or all of their revenues in U.S. dollars but incur a portion of their expenses in othercurrencies, exchange rate fluctuations could cause us to suffer exchange rate losses, thereby increasing expenses and reducing income.We engage in worldwide commerce with a variety of entities. Although our operations may expose us to certain levels of foreign currency risk, ourtransactions are predominantly U.S. dollar-denominated. Transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are translated at the exchange rate ineffect at the date of each transaction. Expenses incurred in foreign currencies against which the U.S. dollar falls in value can increase, decreasing our income agreater percentage of our transactions and expenses in the future may be denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollar. As part of our overall riskmanagement policy, we will attempt to hedge these risks in exchange rate fluctuations from time to time. We may not always be successful in such hedgingactivities and, as a result, our operating results could suffer as a result of un-hedged losses 19 Table of Contentsincurred as a result of exchange rate fluctuations. For example, as of December 31, 2012, the value of the U.S. dollar as compared to the Euro increased byapproximately 2.0% compared with the respective value as of December 31, 2011. A greater percentage of our transactions and expenses in the future may bedenominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar.Labor interruptions and problems could disrupt our business.Certain of our vessels are manned by masters, officers and crews that are employed by third parties. If not resolved in a timely and cost-effective manner,industrial action or other labor unrest could prevent or hinder our operations from being carried out normally and could have a material adverse effect on ourbusiness, results of operations, cash flow and financial condition.The market value of our vessels that we have constructed, acquired or may acquire in the future may fluctuate, which could limit the amount of funds thatwe can borrow, cause us to fail to meet certain financial covenants in our credit facilities and adversely affect our ability to purchase new vessels and ouroperating results.The market value of tankers has been volatile. Vessel values may fluctuate due to a number of different factors, including: general economic and marketconditions affecting the shipping industry; competition from other shipping companies; the types and sizes of available vessels; the availability of othermodes of transportation; increases in the supply of vessel capacity; the cost of new buildings; governmental or other regulations; prevailing charter rates; theage of the vessel; and the need to upgrade secondhand vessels as a result of charterer requirements, technological advances in vessel design or equipment orotherwise. In addition, as vessels grow older, they generally decline in value. To the extent that we incur debt that is secured by any of our vessels, if themarket value of such vessels declines, we may be required to prepay a portion of these secured borrowings.If the market value of our vessels decreases, we may breach some of the covenants contained in the financing agreements relating to our indebtedness at thetime. The credit facilities contain covenants including maximum total net liabilities over total net assets (effective in general after delivery of the vessels),minimum net worth and loan to value ratio covenants applicable after delivery of the vessels initially of 130% or lower. If we breach any such covenants inthe future and we are unable to remedy the relevant breach, our lenders could accelerate our debt and foreclose on our vessels. In addition, if the book valueof a vessel is impaired due to unfavorable market conditions, we would incur a loss that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financialcondition and results of operations.If for any reason we sell any of our vessels at a time when prices are depressed, we could incur a loss and our business, financial condition and results ofoperations could be adversely affected. Conversely, if vessel values are elevated at a time when we wish to acquire additional vessels, the cost of acquisitionmay increase and this could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.In the highly competitive product and chemical tanker sectors of the shipping industry, we may not be able to compete for charters with new entrants orestablished companies with greater resources, which may adversely affect our results of operations.We employ our vessels in the product and chemical tanker sectors, highly competitive markets that are capital intensive and highly fragmented. Competitionarises primarily from other vessel owners, some of whom have substantially greater resources than us. Competition for the transportation of refined petroleumproducts (clean and dirty) and bulk liquid chemicals can be intense and depends on price, location, size, age, condition and the acceptability of the vesseland our managers to the charterers. Due in part to the highly fragmented markets, competitors with greater resources could operate larger fleets throughconsolidations or acquisitions that may be able to offer better prices and fleets than ours.Risks Relating to Our VLCC VesselsThe indemnity may be inadequate to cover any damages.The Securities Purchase Agreement for the VLCC vessels has a cap on indemnity obligations, subject to certain exceptions, of $58.7 million. Although weperformed substantial due diligence with respect to the VLCC Acquisition, there can be no assurance that there will not be undisclosed liabilities or othermatters not discovered in the course of such due diligence and the $58.7 million indemnity may be inadequate to cover these or other damages related tobreaches of such agreement. In addition, after the return to Navios Acquisition of 217,159 shares on November 4, 2011 in settlement of claims relating torepresentation and warranties attributable to the sellers and the return of the balance of the escrow shares to the sellers, it may be difficult to enforce anarbitration award for any amount of damages. 20 Table of ContentsA large proportion of the revenue from the VLCC vessels is derived from a Chinese state-owned company, and changes in the economic and politicalenvironment in China or in Chinese relations with other countries could adversely affect our ability to continue this customer relationship.DOSCO, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Chinese state-owned COSCO, charters four of the seven VLCC vessels (including the newbuilding delivered inJune 2011). Changes in political, economic and social conditions or other relevant policies of the Chinese government, such as changes in laws, regulationsor export and import restrictions, could restrict DOSCO’s ability to continue its relationship with us. If DOSCO becomes unable to perform under its charteragreements with us, we could suffer a loss of revenue that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. Inaddition, we may have limited ability in Chinese courts to enforce any awards for damages that we may suffer if DOSCO were to fail to perform its obligationsunder our charter agreements.One of the vessels is subject to a mutual sale provision between the subsidiary that owns the vessel and the charterer of the vessel, which, if exercised, couldreduce the size of our fleet and reduce our future revenue.The Shinyo Ocean is subject to a mutual sale provision whereby we or the charterer can request the sale of the vessel provided that a price can be obtainedthat is at least $3,000,000 greater than the agreed depreciated value of the vessel as set forth in the charter agreement. If this provision is exercised, we maynot be able to obtain a replacement vessel for the price at which the vessel is sold. In such a case, the size of our fleet would be reduced and we mayexperience a reduction in our future revenue.Risks Related to Our Relationship with Navios Holdings and Its AffiliatesNavios Holdings has limited recent experience in the crude oil, product and chemical tanker sectors.Navios Tankers Management Inc. (the “Manager”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Navios Holdings, oversees the commercial and administrative managementof our entire fleet and the technical management of a portion of our fleet. Navios Holdings is a vertically-integrated seaborne shipping and logistics companywith over 55 years of operating history in the shipping industry that held approximately 47.4% of our shares of common stock as of February 26, 2013. Otherthan with respect to South American operations, Navios Holdings has limited recent experience in the crude oil, chemical and product tanker sectors.Such limited experience could cause Navios Holdings or the Manager to make decisions that a more experienced operator in the sector might not make. IfNavios Holdings or the Manager is not able to properly assess or ascertain a particular aspect of the crude oil, product or chemical tanker sectors, it couldhave a material adverse effect on our operations.Navios Holdings may compete directly with us, causing certain officers to have a conflict of interest.Angeliki Frangou and Ted C. Petrone are each officers and/or directors of both Navios Holdings and Navios Acquisition. We operate in the crude oil, productand chemical tanker sectors of the shipping industry, and although Navios Holdings does not currently operate in those sectors, there is no assurance it willnot enter them. If it does, we may compete directly with Navios Holdings for business opportunities.Navios Holdings, Navios Partners and Navios Acquisition share certain officers and directors who may not be able to devote sufficient time to our affairs,which may affect our ability to conduct operations and generate revenues.Angeliki Frangou and Ted C. Petrone are each officers and/or directors of both Navios Holdings and Navios Acquisition, and Ms. Frangou is an officer anddirector of Navios Partners. As a result, demands for our officers’ time and attention as required from Navios Acquisition, Navios Partners and NaviosHoldings may conflict from time to time and their limited devotion of time and attention to our business may hurt the operation of our business.The loss of key members of our senior management team could disrupt the management of our business.We believe that our success depends on the continued contributions of the members of our senior management team, including Ms. Angeliki Frangou, ourChairman and Chief Executive Officer. The loss of the services of Ms. Frangou or one of our other executive officers or senior management members couldimpair our ability to identify and secure new charter contracts, to maintain good customer relations and to otherwise manage our business, which could havea material adverse effect on our financial performance and our ability to compete.We are dependent on a subsidiary of Navios Holdings for the commercial and administrative management of our fleet and the technical management of aportion of our fleet, which may create conflicts of interest.As we subcontract the technical and commercial management of our fleet, including crewing, maintenance and repair, to our Manager, a subsidiary of NaviosHoldings, and on an interim basis to other third party managers, the loss of these services or 21 Table of Contentsthe failure of the Manager to perform these services could materially and adversely affect the results of our operations. Although we may have rights againstthe Manager if it defaults on its obligations to us, you will have no recourse directly against it. Further, we expect that we will need to seek approval from ourrespective lenders to change our commercial and technical managers.Navios Holdings has responsibilities and relationships to owners other than Navios Acquisition that could create conflicts of interest between us and NaviosHoldings or our Manager. These conflicts may arise in connection with the provision of chartering services to us for our fleet versus carriers managed byNavios Holdings’ subsidiaries or other companies affiliated with Navios Holdings.Navios Holdings, our affiliate and a greater than 5% holder of our common stock, Angeliki Frangou, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, andcertain of our officers and directors collectively own a substantial interest in us, and, as a result, may influence certain actions requiring stockholder vote.Navios Holdings, Angeliki Frangou, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and certain of our officers and directors beneficially own, in the aggregate,50.2% of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock, which permits them to influence the outcome of effectively all matters requiring approval byour stockholders at such time, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. Furthermore, if Navios Holdings andMs. Frangou or an affiliate ceases to hold a minimum of 30% of our common stock then we will be in default under our credit facilities.Risks Related to Our Common Stock and Capital StructureWe are incorporated in the Republic of the Marshall Islands, a country that does not have a well-developed body of corporate law, which may negativelyaffect the ability of public stockholders to protect their interests.Our corporate affairs are governed by our amended and restated articles of incorporation and bylaws, and by the Marshall Islands Business Corporations Act,or the BCA. The provisions of the BCA resemble provisions of the corporation laws of a number of states in the United States. However, there have been fewjudicial cases in the Republic of the Marshall Islands interpreting the BCA. The rights and fiduciary responsibilities of directors under the law of theRepublic of the Marshall Islands are not as clearly established as the rights and fiduciary responsibilities of directors under statutes or judicial precedent inexistence in certain United States jurisdictions. Stockholder rights may differ as well. While the BCA does specifically incorporate the non-statutory law, orjudicial case law, of the State of Delaware and other states with substantially similar legislative provisions, public stockholders may have more difficulty inprotecting their interests in the face of actions by the management, directors or controlling stockholders than would stockholders of a corporationincorporated in a United States jurisdiction.We are incorporated under the laws of the Marshall Islands and our directors and officers are non-U.S. residents, and although you may bring an originalaction in the courts of the Marshall Islands or obtain a judgment against us, our directors or our management based on U.S. laws in the event you believeyour rights as a stockholder have been infringed, it may be difficult to enforce judgments against us, our directors or our management.We are incorporated under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and all of our assets are located outside of the United States. Our business will beoperated primarily from our offices in Athens, Greece. In addition, our directors and officers are non-residents of the United States, and all or a substantialportion of the assets of these non-residents are located outside the United States. As a result, it may be difficult or impossible for you to bring an actionagainst us or against these individuals in the United States if you believe that your rights have been infringed under securities laws or otherwise. Even if youare successful in bringing an action of this kind, the laws of the Marshall Islands and of other jurisdictions may prevent or restrict you from enforcing ajudgment against our assets or the assets of our directors and officers. Although you may bring an original action against us or our affiliates in the courts ofthe Marshall Islands based on U.S. laws, and the courts of the Marshall Islands may impose civil liability, including monetary damages, against us or ouraffiliates for a cause of action arising under Marshall Islands law, it may impracticable for you to do so given the geographic location of the Marshall Islands.Since we are a foreign private issuer, we are not subject to certain SEC regulations that companies incorporated in the United States would be subject to.We are a “foreign private issuer” within the meaning of the rules promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).As such, we are exempt from certain provisions applicable to United States public companies including: • the rules under the Exchange Act requiring the filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, of quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or current reports on Form 8-K; 22 Table of Contents • the sections of the Exchange Act regulating the solicitation of proxies, consents or authorizations in respect of a security registered under theExchange Act; • the provisions of Regulation FD aimed at preventing issuers from making selective disclosures of material information; and • the sections of the Exchange Act requiring insiders to file public reports of their stock ownership and trading activities and establishing insiderliability for profits realized from any “short-swing” trading transaction (i.e., a purchase and sale, or sale and purchase, of the issuer’s equitysecurities within less than six months).Accordingly, investors in our common stock may not be able to obtain all of the information of the type described above, and our stockholders may not beafforded the same protections or information generally available to investors holding shares in public companies in the United States.Anti-takeover provisions in our amended and restated articles of incorporation could make it difficult for our stockholders to replace or remove ourcurrent board of directors or could have the effect of discouraging, delaying or preventing a merger or acquisition, which could adversely affect the marketprice of our common stock.Several provisions of our amended and restated articles of incorporation and bylaws could make it difficult for our stockholders to change the composition ofour board of directors in any one year, preventing them from changing the composition of our management. In addition, the same provisions may discourage,delay or prevent a merger or acquisition that stockholders may consider favorable. These provisions include those that: • authorize our board of directors to issue “blank check” preferred stock without stockholder approval; • provide for a classified board of directors with staggered, three-year terms; • require a super-majority vote in order to amend the provisions regarding our classified board of directors with staggered, three-year terms; and • prohibit cumulative voting in the election of directors.These anti-takeover provisions could substantially impede the ability of stockholders to benefit from a change in control and, as a result, may adverselyaffect the market price of our common stock and your ability to realize any potential change of control premium.We may choose to redeem our outstanding warrants included in the units sold in our IPO at a time that is disadvantageous to our warrant holders.We may redeem the warrants issued as part of our units sold in our IPO in whole and not in part, at a price of $0.01 per warrant, upon a minimum of 30 days’prior written notice of redemption, if and only if, the last sales price of our common stock equals or exceeds $13.75 per share for any 20 trading days within a30 trading day period ending three business days before we send the notice of redemption; provided, however, a current registration statement under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) relating to the shares of our common stock underlying the warrants is then effective. Redemption ofthe warrants could force the warrant holders: (i) to exercise the warrants and pay the exercise price therefore at a time when it may be disadvantageous for theholders to do so; (ii) to sell the warrants at the then-current market price when they might otherwise wish to hold the warrants; or (iii) to accept the nominalredemption price that, at the time the warrants are called for redemption, is likely to be substantially less than the market value of the warrants. We may notredeem any warrant if it is not exercisable.Registration rights held by our initial stockholders and others may have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.Certain stockholders, which include Navios Holdings and certain members of the management of Navios Acquisition, Navios Holdings and Navios Partners,are entitled to demand that we register the resale of their common stock totaling 37,895,138 shares. In addition, one third-party holder has an effective resaleregistration statement with respect to 1,677,759 shares of common stock. If all of these stockholders exercise their registration rights with respect to all oftheir shares of common stock, including the effective resale registration statement, there will be an additional 39,572,897 shares of common stock eligible fortrading in the public market. The presence of these additional shares may have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.The New York Stock Exchange may delist our securities from quotation on its exchange, which could limit your ability to trade our securities and subjectus to additional trading restrictions.Our securities are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”), a national securities exchange. Although we currently satisfy the NYSE minimumlisting standards, which only requires that we meet certain requirements relating to stockholders’ equity, number of round-lot holders, market capitalization,aggregate market value of publicly held shares and distribution requirements, we cannot assure you that our securities will continue to be listed on NYSE inthe future. 23 Table of ContentsIf NYSE delists our securities from trading on its exchange, we could face significant material adverse consequences, including: • a limited availability of market quotations for our securities; • a limited amount of news and analyst coverage for us; • a decreased ability for us to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future; and • limited liquidity for our stockholders due to thin trading.Risks Related to Our IndebtednessWe may not be able to access our debt financing, which may affect our ability to make payments with respect to our vessels.Our ability to borrow amounts under our current and future credit facilities will be subject to the satisfaction of customary conditions precedent andcompliance with terms and conditions included in the loan documents, including a minimum liquidity financial covenant, and to circumstances that may bebeyond our control such as world events, economic conditions, the financial standing of the bank or its willingness to lend to shipping companies such as us.Prior to each drawdown, we will be required, among other things, to provide our lenders with satisfactory evidence that certain conditions precedent havebeen met. To the extent that we are not able to satisfy these requirements, including as a result of a decline in the value of our vessels, we may not be able todraw down the full amount under certain of our credit facilities without obtaining a waiver or consent from the respective lenders.We have substantial indebtedness and may incur substantial additional indebtedness, which could adversely affect our financial health and our ability toobtain financing in the future, react to changes in our business and make debt service payments.We have substantial indebtedness, and we may also increase the amount of our indebtedness in the future. The terms of our credit facilities and otherinstruments and agreement governing our indebtedness do not prohibit us from doing so. Our substantial indebtedness could have important consequencesfor our stockholders.Because of our substantial indebtedness: • our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, debt service requirements, vessel or other acquisitions orgeneral corporate purposes may be impaired in the future; • if new debt is added to our existing debt levels, the related risks that we now face would increase and we may not be able to meet all of our debtobligations; • a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations must be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness, therebyreducing the funds available to us for other purposes, and there can be no assurance that our operations will generate sufficient cash flow toservice this indebtedness; • we will be exposed to the risk of increased interest rates because our borrowings under the credit facilities will be at variable rates of interest; • it may be more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations to our lenders, resulting in possible defaults on and acceleration of such indebtedness; • we may be more vulnerable to general adverse economic and industry conditions; • we may be at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors with less debt or comparable debt at more favorable interest rates and, as aresult, we may not be better positioned to withstand economic downturns; • our ability to refinance indebtedness may be limited or the associated costs may increase; and • our flexibility to adjust to changing market conditions and ability to withstand competitive pressures could be limited, or we may be preventedfrom carrying out capital spending that is necessary or important to our growth strategy and efforts to improve operating margins or our business.Highly leveraged companies are significantly more vulnerable to unanticipated downturns and set backs, whether directly related to their business or flowingfrom a general economic or industry condition, and therefore are more vulnerable to a business failure or bankruptcy.The agreements and instruments governing our indebtedness do or will contain restrictions and limitations that could significantly impact our ability tooperate our business and adversely affect our stockholders.The agreements and instruments governing our indebtedness impose certain operating and financial restrictions on us. 24 Table of ContentsAmong other restrictions, these restrictions may limit our ability to: • incur or guarantee additional indebtedness or issue certain preferred stock; • create liens on our assets; • make investments; • engage in mergers and acquisitions in sell all or substantially all of our properties or assets; • redeem or repurchase capital stock, pay dividends or make other restricted payments and investments; • make capital expenditures; • change the management of our vessels or terminate the management agreements we have relating to our vessels; • enter into long-term charter arrangements without the consent of the lender; • transfer or sell any of our vessels; and • enter into certain transactions with our affiliates.Therefore, we will need to seek permission from our lenders in order to engage in some corporate and commercial actions that we believe would be in the bestinterest of our business, and a denial of permission may make it difficult for us to successfully execute our business strategy or effectively compete withcompanies that are not similarly restricted. Our lenders’ interests may be different from our interests, and we cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtainour lenders’ permission when needed. This may prevent us from taking actions that are in our best interest. Any future credit agreement may include similar ormore restrictive restrictions.Our credit facilities contain requirements that the value of the collateral provided pursuant to the credit facilities must equal or exceed by a certainpercentage the amount of outstanding borrowings under the credit facilities and that we maintain a minimum liquidity level. In addition, our credit facilitiescontain additional restrictive covenants, including a minimum net worth requirement and maximum total net liabilities over net assets. It is an event ofdefault under our credit facilities if such covenants are not complied with or if Navios Holdings, Ms. Angeliki Frangou, our Chairman and Chief ExecutiveOfficer, and their respective affiliates cease to hold a minimum percentage of our issued stock. In addition, the indenture governing the notes also containscertain provisions obligating us in certain instances to make offers to purchase outstanding notes with the net proceeds of certain sales or other dispositionsof assets or upon the occurrence of an event of loss with respect to a mortgaged vessel, as defined in the indenture. Our ability to comply with the covenantsand restrictions contained in our agreements and instruments governing our indebtedness may be affected by economic, financial and industry conditionsand other factors beyond our control. If we are unable to comply with these covenants and restrictions, our indebtedness could be accelerated. If we areunable to repay indebtedness, our lenders could proceed against the collateral securing that indebtedness. In any such case, we may be unable to borrowunder our credit facilities and may not be able to repay the amounts due under our agreements and instruments governing our indebtedness. This could haveserious consequences to our financial condition and results of operations and could cause us to become bankrupt or insolvent. Our ability to comply withthese covenants in future periods will also depend substantially on the value of our assets, our charter rates, our success at keeping our costs low and ourability to successfully implement our overall business strategy. Any future credit agreement or amendment or debt instrument may contain similar or morerestrictive covenants.We and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantially more indebtedness, including secured indebtedness. This could further exacerbate the risksassociated with our substantial indebtedness.We and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future. The agreements governing our credit facilities and theindenture governing our notes do not prohibit us or our subsidiaries from doing so. If new indebtedness is added to our current indebtedness levels, therelated risks that we now face would increase and we may not be able to meet all our indebtedness obligations.Our ability to generate the significant amount of cash needed to service our other indebtedness and our ability to refinance all or a portion of ourindebtedness or obtain additional financing depends on many factors beyond our control.Our ability to make scheduled payments on or to refinance our obligations under, our indebtedness will depend on our financial and operating performance,which, in turn, will be subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to the financial and business factors, many of which may be beyondour control.We will use cash to pay the principal and interest on our indebtedness. These payments limit funds otherwise available for working capital, capitalexpenditures, vessel acquisitions and other purposes. As a result of these obligations, our current liabilities may exceed our current assets. We may need totake on additional indebtedness as we expand our fleet, which could increase our ratio of indebtedness to equity. The need to service our indebtedness maylimit funds available for other purposes and our inability to service indebtedness in the future could lead to acceleration of our indebtedness and foreclosureon our owned vessels. 25 Table of ContentsOur credit facilities mature on various dates through 2022 and our ship mortgage notes mature on November 1, 2017. In addition, borrowings under certain ofthe credit facilities have amortization requirements prior to final maturity. We cannot assure you that we will be able to refinance any of our indebtedness orobtain additional financing, particularly because of our anticipated high levels of indebtedness and the indebtedness incurrence restrictions imposed by theagreements governing our indebtedness, as well as prevailing market conditions.We could face substantial liquidity problems and might be required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our indebtedness service and otherobligations. Our credit facilities, the indenture governing our notes and any future indebtedness may, restrict our ability to dispose of assets and use theproceeds from any such dispositions. If we do not reinvest the proceeds of asset sales in our business (in the case of asset sales of no collateral with respect tosuch indebtedness) or in new vessels or other related assets that are mortgaged in favor of the lenders under our credit facilities (in the case of assets sales ofcollateral securing), we may be required to use the proceeds to repurchase senior indebtedness. We cannot assure you we will be able to consummate anyasset sales, or if we do, what the timing of the sales will be or whether the proceeds that we realize will be adequate to meet indebtedness service obligationswhen due.Most of our credit facilities require that we maintain loan to collateral value ratios in order to remain in compliance with the covenants set forth therein. If thevalue of such collateral falls below such required level, we would be required to either prepay the loans or post additional collateral to the extent necessary tobring the value of the collateral as compared to the aggregate principal amount of the loan back to the required level. We cannot assure you that we will havethe cash on hand or the financing available to prepay the loans or have any unencumbered assets available to post as additional collateral. In such case, wewould be in default under such credit facility and the collateral securing such facility would be subject to foreclosure by the applicable lenders.Moreover, certain of our credit facilities are secured by vessels currently under construction pursuant to shipbuilding contracts. Because we rely on thesefacilities to finance the scheduled payments as they come due under the shipbuilding contracts, it is possible that any default under such a facility wouldresult, in the absence of other available funds, in default by us under the associated shipbuilding contract. In such a case, our rights in the related newbuildwould be subject to foreclosure by the applicable creditor. In addition, a payment default under a shipbuilding contract would give the shipyard the right toterminate the contract without any further obligation to finish construction and may give it rights against us for having failed to make the required payments.An increase or continuing volatility in interest rates would increase the cost of servicing our indebtedness and could reduce our profitability, earnings andcash flow.Amounts borrowed under our term loan facilities fluctuate with changes in LIBOR. LIBOR has been volatile, with the spread between LIBOR and the primelending rate widening significantly at times. We may also incur indebtedness in the future with variable interest rates. As a result, an increase in marketinterest rates would increase the cost of servicing our indebtedness and could materially reduce our profitability, earnings and cash flows. The impact of suchan increase would be more significant for us than it would be for some other companies because of our substantial indebtedness. Because the interest ratesborne by our outstanding indebtedness may fluctuate with changes in LIBOR, if this volatility were to continue, it could affect the amount of interest payableon our debt, which in turn, could have an adverse effect on our profitability, earnings and cash flow.The international nature of our operations may make the outcome of any bankruptcy proceedings difficult to predict.We are incorporated under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands and our subsidiaries are also incorporated under the laws of the Republic of theMarshall Islands, the Cayman Islands, Hong Kong, the British Virgin Islands and certain other countries other than the United States, and we conductoperations in countries around the world. Consequently, in the event of any bankruptcy, insolvency or similar proceedings involving us or one of oursubsidiaries, bankruptcy laws other than those of the United States could apply. We have limited operations in the United States. If we become a debtor underthe United States bankruptcy laws, bankruptcy courts in the United States may seek to assert jurisdiction over all of our assets, wherever located, includingproperty situated in other countries. There can be no assurance, however, that we would become a debtor in the United States or that a United Statesbankruptcy court would be entitled to, or accept, jurisdiction over such bankruptcy case or that courts in other countries that have jurisdiction over us andour operations would recognize a United States bankruptcy court’s jurisdiction if any other bankruptcy court would determine it had jurisdiction.We may be unable to raise funds necessary to finance the change of control repurchase offer required by the indenture governing our notes.If we experience specified changes of control, we would be required to make an offer to repurchase all of our outstanding notes (unless otherwise redeemed) ata price equal to 101% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the repurchase date. The occurrence of specified events thatcould constitute a change of control will constitute a 26 Table of Contentsdefault under our credit facilities. There are also change of control events that would constitute a default under the credit facilities that would not be a changeof control under the indenture. In addition, our credit facilities prohibit the purchase of notes by us in the event of a change of control, unless and until suchtime as the indebtedness under our credit facilities is repaid in full. As a result, following a change of control event, we would not be able to repurchase notesunless we first repay all indebtedness outstanding under our credit facilities and any of our other indebtedness that contains similar provisions; or obtain awaiver from the holders of such indebtedness to permit us to repurchase the notes. We may be unable to repay all of that indebtedness or obtain a waiver ofthat type. Any requirement to offer to repurchase outstanding notes may therefore require us to refinance our other outstanding debt, which we may not beable to do on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. In addition, our failure to purchase the notes after a change of control in accordance with the terms ofthe indenture would constitute an event of default under the indenture, which in turn would result in a default under our credit facilities.Our inability to repay the indebtedness under our credit facilities will constitute an event of default under the indenture governing our notes, which couldhave materially adverse consequences to us. In the event of a change of control, we cannot assure you that we would have sufficient assets to satisfy all of ourobligations under our credit facilities and the notes. Our future indebtedness may also require such indebtedness to be repurchased upon a change.We may require additional financing to acquire vessels or businesses or to exercise vessel purchase options, and such financing may not be available.In the future, we may be required to make substantial cash outlays to exercise options or to acquire vessels or business and will need additional financing tocover all or a portion of the purchase prices. We may seek to cover the cost of such items with new debt collateralized by the vessels to be acquired, ifapplicable, but there can be no assurance that we will generate sufficient cash or that debt financing will be available. Moreover, the covenants in our creditfacilities, the indenture or other debt, may make it more difficult to obtain such financing by imposing restrictions on what we can offer as collateral.Tax RisksIn addition to the following risk factors, you should read “Item 10 Additional Information” for a more complete discussion of the expected material U.S.federal and non-U.S. income tax considerations relating to us and the ownership and disposition of our common stock.U.S. tax authorities could treat us as a “passive foreign investment company,” which could have adverse U.S. federal income tax consequences to U.S.holders.We will be treated as a “passive foreign investment company,” or PFIC, for U.S. federal income tax purposes if either (1) at least 75% of our gross income forany taxable year consists of certain types of “passive income” or (2) at least 50% of the average value of our assets produce or are held for the production ofthose types of “passive income.” For purposes of these tests, “passive income” includes dividends, interest, and gains from the sale or exchange of investmentproperty and rents and royalties other than rents and royalties that are received from unrelated parties in connection with the active conduct of a trade orbusiness. For purposes of these tests, income derived from the performance of services does not constitute “passive income.” U.S. stockholders of a PFIC maybe subject to a disadvantageous U.S. federal income tax regime with respect to the income derived by the PFIC, the distributions they receive from the PFICand the gain, if any, they derive from the sale or other disposition of their shares in the PFIC.Based on our current and projected methods of operations, and an opinion of counsel, we believe that we were not a PFIC for the 2012 and 2011 taxable years(we were treated as a PFIC for the 2008 and 2009 taxable years), and we do not believe that we will be a PFIC for 2013 and subsequent taxable years. Forpost-2010 taxable years, our U.S. counsel, Thompson Hine LLP, is of the opinion that (1) the income we receive from the time chartering activities and assetsengaged in generating such income should not be treated as passive income or assets, respectively, and (2) so long as our income from time charters exceeds25.0% of our gross income for each taxable year after our 2010 taxable year and the value of our vessels contracted under time charters exceeds 50.0% of theaverage value of our assets for each taxable year after our 2010 taxable year, we should not be a PFIC for any taxable year after our 2010 taxable year. Thisopinion is based on representations and projections provided to our counsel by us regarding our assets, income and charters, and its validity is conditionedon the accuracy of such representations and projections.We may have to pay tax on United States source income, which would reduce our earnings.Under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”), 50% of the gross shipping income of a vessel-owning or chartering corporation, such as us and oursubsidiaries, that is attributable to transportation that begins or ends, but that does not both begin and end, in the United States is characterized as U.S.-sourceshipping income and such income is subject to a 4% U.S. federal income tax without allowance for deduction, unless that corporation qualifies for exemptionfrom tax under 27 Table of ContentsSection 883 of the Code and the treasury regulations promulgated there under (“Treasury Regulations”). In general, the exemption from U.S. federal incometaxation under Section 883 of the Code provides that if a non-U.S. corporation satisfies the requirements of Section 883 of the Code and the TreasuryRegulations, it will not be subject to the net basis and branch profit taxes or the 4% gross basis tax described below on its U.S.-Source InternationalTransportation Income.We expect that we and each of our vessel-owning subsidiaries will qualify for this statutory tax exemption and we will take this position for U.S. federalincome tax return reporting purposes. However, there are factual circumstances beyond our control that could cause us to lose the benefit of this taxexemption and thereby become subject to U.S. federal income tax on our U.S.-source income.If we or our vessel-owning subsidiaries are not entitled to this exemption under Section 883 for any taxable year, we or our subsidiaries would be subject forthose years to a 4% U.S. federal income tax on its U.S.-source shipping income. The imposition of this taxation could have a negative effect on our businessand would result in decreased earnings.Other Tax JurisdictionsAs of January 1, 2013, foreign flagged vessels that are managed by Greek or foreign ship management companies in Greece are subject to Greek tonnagetax. The payment of tonnage tax exhausts the tax liability of the foreign ship owning company against any tax, duty, charge or contribution payable onincome from the exploitation of the foreign flagged vessel.Item 4. Information on the CompanyA. History and development of Navios AcquisitionNavios Acquisition was formed on March 14, 2008 under the laws of the Republic of the Marshall Islands and has its principal offices located at 85 AktiMiaouli Street, Piraeus, Greece 185 38, and its telephone number is (011) +30-210-4595000. Our agent for service is Trust Company of the Marshall Islands,Inc., located at Trust Company Complex, Ajeltake Island, P.O. Box 1405, Majuro, Marshall Islands MH96960.On May 25, 2010, after its special meeting of stockholders, Navios Acquisition announced the approval of: (a) the acquisition from Navios Holdings of 13vessels (11 product tankers and two chemical tankers) for an aggregate purchase price of $457.7 million, of which $128.7 million was to be paid fromexisting cash and the $329.0 million balance with existing and new debt financing pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Acquisition Agreement by andbetween Navios Acquisition and Navios Holdings and (b) certain amendments to Navios Acquisition’s amended and restated articles of incorporation.On May 28, 2010, Navios Acquisition consummated the vessel acquisition, which constituted its initial business combination. In connection with thestockholder vote to approve the vessel acquisition, holders of 10,021,399 shares of common stock voted against the vessel acquisition and elected to redeemtheir shares in exchange for an aggregate of approximately $99.3 million, which amount was disbursed from the trust account on May 28, 2010. In addition,on May 28, 2010, Navios Acquisition disbursed an aggregate of $8.9 million from the trust account to the underwriters of our IPO for deferred fees. Afterdisbursement of approximately $76.5 million to Navios Holdings to reimburse it for the first equity installment payment on the vessels of $38.8 million andother associated payments, the balance of the trust account of $66.1 million was released to us for general operating expenses.The initial business combination was treated as an asset acquisition and the consideration paid and fair values of assets and liabilities assumed on May 28,2010 (See note 3 of the audited financial statements included herein).On August 27, 2010, Navios Acquisition completed the “Warrant Exercise Program” under which holders of its publicly traded and private warrants had theopportunity to exercise their warrants on enhanced terms (see note 19 of the audited financial statements included herein).On September 10, 2010, Navios Acquisition consummated the VLCC Acquisition of seven VLCCs for an aggregate purchase price of $587.0 million,adjusted for net working capital acquired of $20.6 million. The purchase price was financed as follows: (a) $410.5 million of bank debt, assumed at closing,consisting of six credit facilities with a consortium of banks; (b) $134.3 million of cash paid at closing; (c) $11.0 million through the issuance of 1,894,918Navios Acquisition shares of common stock (based on the closing trading price averaged over the 15 trading days immediately prior to closing onSeptember 10, 2010) of which 1,378,122 shares of common stock were deposited into a one-year escrow to provide for indemnity or other claims (see note 19of the audited financial statements included herein); and (d) $51.4 million due to a shipyard in 2011 for the newbuilding that was delivered in June 2011.The VLCC Acquisition was accounted for as a business combination. 28 Table of ContentsOn October 21, 2010, Navios Acquisition and Navios Acquisition Finance (US) Inc., its wholly owned finance subsidiary (“Navios Acquisition Finance”),completed the sale of $400.0 million of 8 5/8% First Priority Ship Mortgage notes due 2017 (the “Existing Notes”).On May 26, 2011, Navios Acquisition and Navios Acquisition Finance completed the sale of $105.0 million of 8 5/8% first priority ship mortgage notes due2017 (the “Additional Notes”) at 102.25% plus accrued interest from May 1, 2011.Equity TransactionsOn September 17, 2010, Navios Acquisition issued 3,000 shares of preferred stock to an independent third party holder in connection with the payment ofcertain consultant and advisory fees. The preferred stock issued to the consultant was recorded at fair value as an expense in our statement of income totaling$5.6 million.On October 29, 2010, Navios Acquisition issued 540 shares of Series B Convertible preferred stock (fair value $1.6 million) to the seller of two newbuild LR1product tankers. The preferred stock contains a 2% per annum dividend payable quarterly starting on January 1, 2011, and mandatorily converts into sharesof common stock at various dates in the future subject to the terms and conditions of such preferred stock. The holders of the preferred stock also have theright to convert their shares to common stock subject to certain terms and conditions. The preferred stock does not have any voting rights.On November 19, 2010, the Company completed the public offering of 6,500,000 shares of common stock at $5.50 per share and raised gross proceeds of$35.8 million. The net proceeds of this offering, including the underwriting discount of $1.8 million and excluding offering costs of $0.6 million wereapproximately $34.0 million.Pursuant to an Exchange Agreement entered into March 30, 2011, Navios Holdings exchanged 7,676,000 shares of Navios Acquisition’s common stock itheld for 1,000 shares of non-voting Series C Convertible Preferred Stock of Navios Acquisition. After giving effect to this exchange, Navios Holdings owned45.0% of our outstanding common stock. Each holder of shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock is entitled at their option at any time, after March 31,2013, to convert all or any of their outstanding shares into shares of our common stock determined by multiplying each share of Series C ConvertiblePreferred Stock to be converted by 7,676 subject to certain limitations. Upon the declaration of a common stock dividend, the holders of Series C ConvertiblePreferred Stock are entitled to receive dividends in an amount equal to the amount that would have been received on the number of shares of our commonstock into which the shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock held by each holder could be converted.On November 4, 2011, from the 1,378,122 contingently returnable shares of common stock issued on September 10, 2010 and deposited into escrow for theVLCC Acquisition, 1,160,963 were released to the sellers and the remaining 217,159 were returned to Navios Acquisition. The returned shares were cancelledon December 30, 2011. Following the release, Navios Holdings ownership of the outstanding voting stock of Navios Acquisition increased to 45.24%, and itseconomic interest in Navios Acquisition increased to 53.96%.On each of August 31, 2012, October 31, 2012 and February 13, 2013, Navios Acquisition issued 300 shares (900 in the aggregate) of its authorized Series DPreferred Stock (nominal value $9.0 million) to a shipyard, in partial settlement of the purchase price of the three newbuild LR1 product tankers, the NaveCassiopeia, the Nave Cetus and the Nave Rigel. The preferred stock contains a 6% per annum dividend payable quarterly, starting one year after delivery ofeach vessel. The Series D Preferred Stock will mandatorily convert into shares of common stock 30 months after the issuance, at a price per share of commonstock equal to $10.00. The holder of the preferred stock shall have the right to convert the shares of preferred stock into common stock prior to the scheduledmaturity date at a price of $7.00 per share of common stock. The preferred stock does not have any voting rights. Navios Acquisition is obligated to redeemthe Series D Preferred Stock (or converted common shares), at the holder’s option exercisable beginning 18 months after the issuance, at par payable at up to12 equal quarterly installments. The convertible preferred stock is classified as temporary equity (i.e. apart from permanent equity) as a result of theredemption feature upon exercise of the put option granted to the holder of the preferred stock.In February 2013, Navios Acquisition completed multiple offerings, issuing a total of 35,246,791 shares of its common stock, at a price of $2.85 per sharerepresenting gross proceeds of $100.5 million. The offerings were conducted as follows: • The first registered direct offering of 7,719,300 shares of common stock was completed on February 21, 2013, raising $22.0 million of grossproceeds. The net proceeds of this offering, including the agents’ fees of $0.9 million and excluding estimated offering costs of approximately$0.3 million were $21.1 million. • The second registered direct offering of 9,825,000 shares of common stock was completed on February 26, 2013, raising $28.0 million of grossproceeds. The net proceeds of this offering, including the agents’ fees of $1.1 million and excluding estimated offering costs of approximately$0.3 million were $26.9 million. • In addition, Navios Holdings and certain members of the management of Navios Acquisition, Navios Holdings and Navios Partners purchased anaggregate of 17,702,491 shares of common stock in a private placement that was completed on February 26, 2013 raising $50.5 million of grossproceeds. The net proceeds of this private placement, including the agents’ fees of $2.0 million, were $48.4 million. 29 Table of ContentsVessel Deliveries and AcquisitionsOn February 13, 2013, Navios Acquisition took delivery of the Nave Rigel, a 74,673 dwt LR1 product tanker vessel, from a South Korean shipyard. Thevessel is chartered out to a high quality counterparty for one year at a rate of $11,850 net per day, plus 50% profit sharing. The charterer has been granted anoption to extend the charter for six months on the same terms.On January 24, 2013, Navios Acquisition took delivery of the Nave Bellatrix, a 49,999 dwt MR2 product tanker vessel, from a South Korean shipyard. Thevessel is chartered out to a high quality counterparty for three years at a rate of $13,331 net per day plus 50% profit sharing. The charterer will receive the first$1,000 of profits above the base rate and the owner will receive next $1,000 of profits. Thereafter, all profits will be split equally to each party. The chartererhas been granted an option for an additional year at a rate of $14,813 net per day plus 50% profit sharing.On November 9, 2012, Navios Acquisition took delivery of the Nave Aquila, a 49,991 dwt South Korean — built MR2 product tanker, for a total cost of$37.8 million. Cash paid was $12.7 million and $25.1 million was transferred from vessel deposits.On October 30, 2012, Navios Acquisition took delivery of the Nave Cetus, a 74,581 dwt South Korean — built LR1 product tanker, for a total cost of $44.0million. Cash paid was $27.5 million, $3.0 million shares of Series D Preferred Stock were issued and $13.5 million was transferred from vessel deposits.On August 31, 2012, Navios Acquisition took delivery of the Nave Cassiopeia, a 74,711 dwt South Korean — built LR1 product tanker, for a total cost of$43.8 million. Cash paid was $27.3 million, $3.0 million shares of Series D Preferred Stock were issued and $13.5 million was transferred from vesseldeposits.On July 31, 2012, Navios Acquisition took delivery of the Nave Atria, a 49,992 dwt South Korean — built MR2 product tanker, for a total cost of $37.6million. Cash paid was $9.0 million and $28.6 million was transferred from vessel deposits.On January 20, 2012, Navios Acquisition took delivery of the Nave Estella, a 75,000 dwt South Korean — built LR1 product tanker, for a total cost of $44.6million. Cash paid was $11.0 million and $33.6 million was transferred from vessel deposits.B. Business OverviewIntroductionNavios Acquisition owns a large fleet of modern crude oil, refined petroleum product and chemical tankers providing world-wide marine transportationservices. Our strategy is to charter our vessels to international oil companies, refiners and large vessel operators under long, medium and short-term charters.We are committed to providing quality transportation services and developing and maintaining long-term relationships with our customers. We believe thatthe Navios brand will allow us to take advantage of increasing global environmental concerns that have created a demand in the petroleum products/crudeoil seaborne transportation industry for vessels and operators that are able to conform to the stringent environmental standards currently being imposedthroughout the world.Navios Acquisition’s FleetAs of March 21, 2013, our current fleet consists of a total of 29 double-hulled tanker vessels, aggregating approximately 3.3 million deadweight tons, or dwt.The fleet includes seven VLCC tankers (over 200,000 dwt per ship), which transport crude oil, eight Long Range 1 (“LR1”) product tankers (50,000-79,999dwt per ship), 12 Medium Range 2 (“MR2”) product tankers (30,000-49,999 dwt per ship) and two chemical tankers (25,000 dwt per ship), which transportrefined petroleum products and bulk liquid chemicals. Of the 29 vessels in our current fleet, we have taken delivery of seven VLCC tankers, 30 Table of Contentsseven LR1 tankers, five MR2 product tankers and two chemical tankers, and we expect to take delivery of five vessels in the remaining of 2013, and threevessels in 2014 based on current construction schedule. All the vessels that we have taken delivery of, as well as three of the MR2 and one of the LR1product tankers that we will take delivery of during 2013, are currently chartered-out to high-quality counterparties, including affiliates of Shell, FormosaPetrochemical Corporation, Sinochem Group, SK Shipping and DOSCO (a wholly owned subsidiary of COSCO) with an average remaining charter period ofapproximately 2.8 years. As of March 19, 2013, we had charters covering 91.1% of available days in 2013, 56.4% of available days in 2014 and 36.2% ofavailable days in 2015, based on the estimated scheduled delivery dates for vessels under construction. Vessels Type Built/DeliveryDate DWT NetCharterRate Profit Share ExpirationDateOwned Vessels Nave Cielo LR1 Product Tanker 2007 74,671 11,850 50%/50% November 2013Nave Ariadne LR1 Product Tanker 2007 74,671 11,850 50%/50% November 2013Nave Cosmos Chemical Tanker 2010 25,130 11,700 50%/50% August 2013Nave Polaris Chemical Tanker 2011 25,145 11,700 50%/50% July 2013Shinyo Splendor VLCC 1993 306,474 38,019 None May 2014Shinyo Navigator VLCC 1996 300,549 42,705 None December 2016C. Dream VLCC 2000 298,570 29,625 50% above $30,000 March 2019 40% above $40,000 Shinyo Ocean VLCC 2001 281,395 38,400 50% above $43,500 January 2017Shinyo Kannika VLCC 2001 287,175 38,025 50% above $44,000 February 2017Shinyo Saowalak VLCC 2010 298,000 48,153 35% above $54,388 June 2025 40% above 59,388 50% above 69,388 Shinyo Kieran VLCC 2011 297,066 48,153 35% above $54,388 June 2026 40% above $59,388 50% above $69,388 Buddy MR2 Product Tanker 2009 50,470 21,503 None October 2014Bull MR2 Product Tanker 2009 50,542 21,503 None September 2014Nave Andromeda LR1 Product Tanker 2011 75,000 12,000 100% up to $15,000 November 2014 50% above $15,000 Nave Estella LR1 Product Tanker 2012 75,000 11,850 90% up to 15,000 January 2015 50% above $15,000 Nave Atria MR2 Product Tanker 2012 49,992 13,331 50% /50% July 2015Nave Cassiopeia LR1 Product Tanker 2012 74,711 11,850 50% /50% August 2013Nave Cetus LR1 Product Tanker 2012 74,581 11,850 50% /50% October 2013Nave Aquila MR2 Product Tanker 2012 49,991 13,331 50% /50% November 2015Nave Bellatrix MR2 Product Tanker 2013 49,999 13,331 50% /50% January 2016Nave Rigel LR1 Product Tanker 2013 75,000 11,850 50% /50% February 2014Owned Vessels to be Delivered TBN LR1 Q2 2013 75,000 11,850 50% /50% TBN MR2 Q1 2013 50,000 13,331 50% /50% TBN MR2 Q1 2013 50,000 13,825 50%/50% TBN MR2 Q2 2013 50,000 13,825 TBN MR2 Q2 2013 50,000 TBN MR2 Q2 2014 50,000 TBN MR2 Q3 2014 50,000 TBN MR2 Q4 2014 50,000 (1)Net time charter-out rate per day (net of commissions). 31(1)(2)(3,4)(3,4)(5)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(9)(8)(10)(9)(9)(10)(11)(12) Table of Contents(2)Estimated dates assuming midpoint of redelivery of charterers.(3)On October 28, 2011, the charter contracts for the Nave Cielo and the Nave Ariadne were terminated prior to their original expiration in June 2013.Navios Acquisition entered into certain settlement agreements with the charterers that provide for an amount of approximately $5.0 million tocompensate for the early termination of the charters and to cover any outstanding receivables, out of which $2.0 million will be settled in installmentsthrough June 2015.(4)Charterer’s option to extend the charter for 6 months at same rate.(5)Charterer’s option to extend for additional 6 months at $12,188 (net) plus 50%/50% profit sharing.(6)Charterer’s option to extend the charter for 1+1 years at $13,000 (net) 1st optional year plus 100% profit up to $16,000 plus 50/50% profit sharingabove $16,000; $14,000 (net) 2nd optional year plus 100% profit up to $17,000 plus 50/50% profit sharing above $17,000. Profit sharing formula iscalculated monthly and incorporates $2,000 premium above the relevant index.(7)Charterer’s option to extend the charter for 1+1 years at $11,850 (net) 1st optional year plus 90% profit up to $16,000 plus 50/50% profit sharingabove $16,000; $11,850 (net) 2nd optional year plus 90% profit up to $17,000 plus 50/50% profit sharing above $17,000. Profit sharing formula iscalculated monthly and incorporates $2,000 premium above the relevant index.(8)Charter duration three years. Charterer’s option to extend the charter for 1+ 1 years at $14,566 (net) 1st optional year plus profit sharing; $15,553 (net)2 optional year plus profit sharing. The profit sharing will be calculated monthly and profits will be split equally between each party. Profit sharingformula incorporates $1,000 premium above the relevant index.(9)Charter duration one year. Charterer’s option to extend the charter for another 6 months at $11,850 (net) plus 50% profit sharing.(10)Charter duration three years. Charterer’s option to extend the charter for 1 year at $14,813 (net) plus profit sharing. The charterers will receive 100% ofthe first $1,000 in profits above the base rate and the owners will receive 100% of the next $1,000. Thereafter, all profits will be split equally to eachparty.(11)Charter duration three years. Charterer’s option to extend the charter for 1 year at $15,306 (net) plus profit sharing. The charterers will receive 100% ofthe first $1,000 in profits above the base rate and the owners will receive 100% of the next $1,000. Thereafter, all profits will be split equally to eachparty.(12)Charter duration one year. Charterer’s option to extend for 1 year at $14,813.Competitive StrengthsWe believe that the following strengths will allow us to maintain a competitive advantage within the international shipping market: • Modern, High–Quality Fleet. We own a large fleet of modern, high–quality double–hull tankers that are designed for enhanced safety and lowoperating costs. We believe that the increased enforcement of stringent environmental standards currently being imposed throughout the world hasresulted in a shift in major charterers’ preference towards greater use of modern double–hull vessels. We also have a large proportion of young productand chemical tankers in our fleet. Since our inception, we have committed to and have fully financed investments of over $1.0 billion, includinginvestments of approximately $0.6 billion in newbuilding constructions. As of March 19, 2013, our fleet had an average age of approximately 5.9years. Once we have taken delivery of all of our vessels, scheduled to occur by the end of the fourth quarter of 2014, the average age of our fleet will be5.3 years. We believe that owning and maintaining a modern, high–quality fleet reduces off–hire time and operating costs, improves safety andenvironmental performance and provides us with a competitive advantage in securing employment for our vessels. • Operating Visibility Through Contracted Revenues. All of the vessels that we have taken delivery of as of March 21, 2013, as well as the three MR2and one LR1 product tanker vessels that we will take delivery of in the first and second quarter of 2013, are chartered out with an average remainingcharter period of approximately 2.8 years, and we believe our existing charter coverage provides us with predictable, contracted revenues and operatingvisibility. As of March 21, 2013, we had charters covering 91.1% of available days in 2013, 56.4% of available days in 2014 and 36.2% of availabledays in 2015, based on the estimated scheduled delivery dates for vessels under construction. The charter arrangements for our seven VLCC tankers,eight contracted LR1 tankers, eight MR2 product tankers and two chemical tankers represent $ 179.4 million in 2013, $142.0 million in 2014 and$111.5 million in 2015 of aggregate contracted net charter revenue, exclusive of any profit sharing. • Diversified Fleet. Our diversified fleet, which includes VLCC, product and chemical tankers, allows us to serve our customers’ international crude oil,petroleum product and liquid bulk chemical transportation needs. VLCC tankers transport crude oil and operate on primarily long–haul trades from theArabian Gulf to the Far East, North America and Europe. Product tankers transport a large number of different refined oil products, such as naphtha,gasoline, kerosene, jetfuel and gasoil, and principally operate on short– to medium–haul routes. Chemical tankers transport primarily organic andinorganic chemicals, vegetable oils and animal fats. We believe that our fleet of vessels servicing the crude oil, product and chemical tankertransportation sectors provides us with more balanced exposure to oil and commodities and more diverse opportunities to generate revenues thanwould a focus on any single shipping sector. 32nd Table of Contents• High–Quality Counterparties. Our strategy is to charter our vessels to international oil companies, refiners and large vessel operators under long,medium and short–term charters. We are committed to providing safe and quality transportation services and developing and maintaining long–termrelationships with our customers, and we believe that our modern fleet will allow us to charter–out our vessels to what management views as high–quality counterparties and for long periods of time. Our current charterers include Shell, one of the largest global groups of energy and petrochemicalcompanies, operating in over 90 countries, Dalian Ocean Shipping Company (“DOSCO”), a wholly owned subsidiary of COSCO, one of China’s largeststate–owned enterprises specializing in global shipping, logistics and ship building and repairing, Sinochem, a “Fortune Global 500” company;Formosa Petrochemical Corporation, a leading Taiwanese energy company; Navig8, a company that controls a substantial fleet of product tankers andSK Shipping Company Limited, a leading Korean shipowner and transportation company and part of the Korean multinational business conglomerate,the SK Group; or their affiliates. • An Experienced Management Team and a Strong Brand. We have an experienced management team that we believe is well regarded in the shippingindustry. The members of our management team have considerable experience in the shipping and financial industries. We also believe that we will beable to leverage the management structure at Navios Holdings, which benefits from a reputation for reliability and performance and operationalexperience in both the tanker and drybulk markets. Our management team is led by Angeliki Frangou, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, whohas over 20 years of experience in the shipping industry. Ms. Frangou is also the Chairman and CEO of Navios Holdings and Navios Partners and hasbeen a Chief Executive Officer of various shipping and finance companies in the past. Ms. Frangou is a member of a number of recognized shippingcommittees. We believe that our well respected management team and strong brand may present us with market opportunities not afforded to otherindustry participants.Business StrategyWe seek to generate predictable and growing cash flow through the following: • Strategically Manage Sector Exposure. We operate a fleet of crude carriers and product and chemical tankers, which we believe provides us withdiverse opportunities with a range of producers and consumers. As we grow our fleet, we expect to adjust our relative emphasis among the crude oil,product and chemical tanker sectors according to our view of the relative opportunities in these sectors. We believe that having a mixed fleet of tankersprovides the flexibility to adapt to changing market conditions and will allow us to capitalize on sector–specific opportunities through varyingeconomic cycles. • Enhance Operating Visibility With Charter–Out Strategy. We believe that we are a safe, cost–efficient operator of modern and well–maintainedtankers. We also believe that these attributes, together with our strategy of proactively working towards meeting our customers’ chartering needs, willcontribute to our ability to attract leading charterers as customers and to our success in obtaining attractive long–term charters. We will also seek profitsharing arrangements in our long–term time charters, to provide us with potential incremental revenue above the contracted minimum charter rates.Depending on then applicable market conditions, we intend to deploy our vessels to leading charterers on a mix of long, medium and short–term timecharters, with a greater emphasis on long–term charters and profit sharing. We believe that this chartering strategy will afford us opportunities tocapture increased profits during strong charter markets, while benefiting from the relatively stable cash flows and high utilization rates associated withlonger term time charters. As of March 19, 2013, we had charters covering 91.1% of available days in 2013, 56.4% of available days in 2014 and 36.2%of available days in 2015, based on the estimated scheduled delivery dates for vessels under construction. We will look to secure employment for thenewbuilding product tankers scheduled for delivery over the next three years, as we draw nearer to taking delivery of the vessels. • Capitalize on Low Vessel Prices. We intend to grow our fleet using Navios Holdings’ global network of relationships and extensive experience in themarine transportation industry to make selective acquisitions of young, high–quality, modern, double–hulled vessels in the crude oil, product andchemical tanker transportation sectors. We are focused on purchasing tanker assets at favorable prices. We believe that the recent financial crisis anddevelopments in the marine transportation industry created significant opportunities to acquire vessels in the tanker market near historically low priceson an inflation adjusted basis. Developments in the banking industry continue to limit the availability of credit to shipping industry participants,creating opportunities for well–capitalized companies with access to additional available financing. Although there has been a trend towardsconsolidation over the past 15 years, the tanker market remains fragmented. In the ordinary course of our business, we engage in the evaluation ofpotential candidates for acquisitions and strategic transactions. • Leverage the Experience, Brand, Network and Relationships of Navios Holdings. We intend to capitalize on the global network of relationships thatNavios Holdings has developed during its long history of investing and operating in the marine transportation industry. This includes decades–longrelationships with leading charterers, financing sources and key shipping industry players. When charter markets and vessel prices are depressed andvessel financing is difficult to obtain, as is currently the case, we believe the relationships and experience of Navios Holdings and its managementenhances our ability to acquire young, technically advanced vessels at cyclically low prices and employ them under attractive charters with leadingcharterers. Navios Holdings’ long involvement and reputation for reliability in the Asia Pacific region have also allowed it to 33 Table of Contents develop privileged relationships with many of the largest institutions in Asia. Through its established reputation and relationships, Navios Holdingshas had access to opportunities not readily available to most other industry participants that lack Navios Holdings’ brand recognition, credibility andtrack record. • Benefit from Navios Holdings’ Leading Risk Management Practices and Corporate Managerial Support. Risk management requires the balancing of anumber of factors in a cyclical and potentially volatile environment. Fundamentally, the challenge is to appropriately allocate capital to competingopportunities of owning or chartering vessels. In part, this requires a view of the overall health of the market, as well as an understanding of capitalcosts and returns. Navios Holdings actively engages in assessing financial and other risks associated with fluctuating market rates, fuel prices, creditrisks, interest rates and foreign exchange rates.Navios Holdings closely monitors credit exposure to charterers and other counterparties. Navios Holdings has established policies designed to ensure thatcontracts are entered into with counterparties that have appropriate credit history. Counterparties and cash transactions are limited to high–credit, quality–collateralized corporations and financial institutions. Navios Holdings has strict guidelines and policies that are designed to limit the amount of creditexposure. We believe that Navios Acquisition will benefit from these established policies. • Implement and Sustain a Competitive Cost Structure. Pursuant to the Management Agreement, the Manager, a subsidiary of Navios Holdings,coordinates and oversees the commercial, technical and administrative management of our fleet. The current technical managers of the VLCC vessels,affiliates of the seller of such vessels, are technical ship management companies that have provided technical management to the VLCC vessels prior tothe consummation of the VLCC Acquisition. These technical managers will continue to provide such services for an interim period, after which thetechnical management of our fleet is expected to be provided solely by the Manager. We believe that the Manager will be able to do so at ratescompetitive with those that would be available to us through independent vessel management companies. For example, pursuant to our managementagreement with Navios Holdings, management fees of our vessels are fixed for the first two years of the agreement. We believe this externalmanagement arrangement will enhance the scalability of our business by allowing us to grow our fleet without incurring significant additionaloverhead costs. We believe that we will be able to leverage the economies of scale of Navios Holdings and manage operating, maintenance andcorporate costs. At the same time, we believe the young age and high–quality of the vessels in our fleet, coupled with Navios Holdings’ safety andenvironmental record, will position us favorably within the crude oil, product and chemical tanker transportation sectors with our customers and forfuture business opportunities.Our CustomersWe provide or will provide seaborne shipping services under charters with customers that we believe are creditworthy. Our major customers during 2012were: DOSCO and STX Panocean Co. LTD. For the year ended December 31, 2012, these two customers accounted for 43.3% and 10.7%, respectively, ofNavios Acquisition’s revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2011, DOSCO, Blue Light Chartering Inc and Jacob Tank Chartering GMBH & CO. KGaccounted for 43.9%, 11.5% and 11.3%, respectively, of Navios Acquisition’s revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2010, Jacob Tank CharteringGMBH & CO. KG, SK Shipping Company Ltd, DOSCO, Formosa Petrochemical Corporation, Blue Light Chartering Inc and Navig8 Chemicals Shipping andTrading Co. accounted for 42.5%, 18.6%, 12.9%, 12.9% and 10.9%, respectively, of Navios Acquisition’s revenue.Although we believe that if any one of our charters were terminated we could re-charter the related vessel at the prevailing market rate relatively quickly, thepermanent loss of a significant customer or a substantial decline in the amount of services requested by a significant customer could harm our business,financial condition and results of operations if we were unable to re-charter our vessel on a favorable basis due to then–current market conditions, orotherwise.ExpensesManagement fees: Pursuant to a Management Agreement dated May 28, 2010, Navios Tankers Management Inc. (the “Manager”), a subsidiary of NaviosHoldings, provides for five years from the closing of the Company’s initial vessel acquisition, commercial and technical management services to NaviosAcquisition’s vessels for a daily fee of $6,000 per owned MR2 product tanker and chemical tanker vessel and $7,000 per owned LR1 product tanker vesseland $10,000 per VLCC tanker vessel for the first two years. On May 4, 2012, Navios Acquisition amended its existing Management Agreement with theManager, to fix the fees for ship management services of its owned fleet at current rates for two additional years, through May 28, 2014. This daily fee coversall of the vessels’ operating expenses, other than certain fees and costs. During the remaining one year of the term of the Management Agreement, NaviosAcquisition expects it will reimburse Navios Holdings for all of the actual operating costs and expenses it incurs in connection with the management of 34 Table of Contentsits fleet. Actual operating costs and expenses will be determined in a manner consistent with how the initial fixed fees were determined. Drydocking expensesare fixed for the first four years under these agreements for up to $0.3 million per LR1 and MR2 product tanker vessel and will be reimbursed at cost forVLCC vessels. Commencing as of March 30, 2012, Navios Acquisition can, upon request to the Manager, partially or fully defer the reimbursement ofdrydocking and other extraordinary fees and expenses under the Agreement to a later date, but not later than January 4, 2014, and if reimbursed on a laterdate, such amounts will bear interest at a rate of 1% per annum over LIBOR. Commencing as of September 28, 2012, Navios Acquisition could, upon request,reimburse the Manager partially or fully, for any fixed management fees outstanding for a period of not more than nine months under the Agreement at a laterdate, but not later than December 31, 2014, and if reimbursed on a later date, such amounts will bear interest at a rate of 1% per annum over LIBOR. Totalmanagement fees for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 amounted to $47.0 million, $35.7 million and $9.8 million, respectively.General and administrative expenses: On May 28, 2010, Navios Acquisition entered into an administrative services agreement with Navios Holdings,expiring on May 28, 2015, pursuant to which a subsidiary of Navios Holdings provides certain administrative management services to Navios Acquisitionwhich include: bookkeeping, audit and accounting services, legal and insurance services, administrative and clerical services, banking and financial services,advisory services, client and investor relations and other. Navios Holdings is reimbursed for reasonable costs and expenses incurred in connection with theprovision of these services. For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, the fees for administrative services rendered by Navios Holdingsamounted to $2.1 million, $1.5 million and $0.4 million, respectively.Off-hireWhen the vessel is “off-hire,” the charterer generally is not required to pay the basic hire rate, and we are responsible for all costs. Prolonged off-hire may leadto vessel substitution or termination of the time charter. A vessel generally will be deemed off-hire if there is a loss of time due to, among other things: • operational deficiencies; drydocking for repairs, maintenance or inspection; equipment breakdowns; or delays due to accidents, crewingstrikes, certain vessel detentions or similar problems; or • the shipowner’s failure to maintain the vessel in compliance with its specifications and contractual standards or to provide the requiredcrew.Under some of our charters, the charterer is permitted to terminate the time charter if the vessel is off-hire for an extended period, which is generally defined asa period of 90 or more consecutive off-hire days.TerminationWe are generally entitled to suspend performance under the time charters covering our vessels if the customer defaults in its payment obligations. Under someof our time charters, either party may terminate the charter in the event of war in specified countries or in locations that would significantly disrupt the freetrade of the vessel. Under some of our time charters covering our vessels require us to return to the charterer, upon the loss of the vessel, all advances paid bythe charterer but not earned by us.Management of Ship Operations, Administration and SafetyNavios Holdings provides, through a wholly owned subsidiary, expertise in various functions critical to our operations. Pursuant to a management agreementand an administrative services agreement with Navios Holdings, we have access to human resources, financial and other administrative functions, including: • bookkeeping, audit and accounting services; • administrative and clerical services; • banking and financial services; and • client and investor relations.Technical management services are also provided, including: • commercial management of the vessel; • vessel maintenance and crewing; • purchasing and insurance; and • shipyard supervision.For more information on the management agreement we have with Navios Holdings and the administrative services agreement we have with NaviosHoldings, please read “Item 7. — Unit holders and Related Party Transactions”. 35 Table of ContentsOil Company Tanker Vetting ProcessTraditionally there have been relatively few charterers in the oil transportation business and that part of the industry has been undergoing consolidation. Theso called “oil majors”, such as Exxon Mobil, BP p.l.c., Royal Dutch Shell plc. Chevron, ConocoPhillips and Total S.A., together with a few smallercompanies, represent a significant percentage of the production, trading and, especially, seaborne transportation of crude oil and refined petroleum productsworldwide. Concerns about the environment have led oil majors to develop and implement a strict due diligence process, known as vetting, when selectingvessels and considering their managers. Vetting has evolved into a sophisticated and comprehensive assessment of both the vessel and the vessel manager.While numerous factors are considered and evaluated prior to a commercial decision, the oil majors, through their association, Oil Companies InternationalMarine Forum (OCIMF), have developed two basic tools: the Ship Inspection Report program, which is known as SIRE and the Tanker Management & SelfAssessment program, which is known as TMSA. Based upon commercial risk, there are three levels of assessment used by oil majors: • terminal use, which clears a vessel to call at one of the oil major’s terminals; • voyage charter, which clears the vessel for a single voyage; and • period charter, which clears the vessel for use for an extended period of time.The depth and complexity of each of these levels of assessment varies. Each of charter agreements for our vessels requires that the applicable vessel have avalid SIRE report (less than six months old) in the OCIMF website as recommended by OCIMF. In addition, under the terms of the charter agreements, thecharterers require that our vessels and their technical managers be vetted and approved to transport crude oil by multiple oil majors. The technical manager isresponsible for obtaining and maintaining the vetting approvals required to operate our vessels. The current technical manager of the VLCC vessels, anaffiliate of the seller of such vessels, is a technical ship management company that has provided technical management to the acquired VLCC vessels prior tothe consummation of the VLCC Acquisition, and such technical manager has been vetted and approved. This technical manager will continue to providesuch services for an interim period after which the technical management of our fleet is expected to be provided solely by the Manager.CompetitionThe market for international seaborne crude oil transportation services is fragmented and highly competitive. Seaborne crude oil transportation servicesgenerally are provided by two main types of operators: major oil company captive fleets (both private and state-owned) and independent ship owner fleets. Inaddition, several owners and operators pool their vessels together on an ongoing basis, and such pools are available to customers to the same extent asindependently owned and operated fleets. Many major oil companies and other oil trading companies also operate their own vessels and use such vessels notonly to transport their own crude oil but also to transport crude oil for third party charterers in direct competition with independent owners and operators inthe tanker charter market. Competition for charters is intense and is based upon price, location, size, age, condition and acceptability of the vessel and itsmanager. Due in part to the fragmented tanker market, competitors with greater resources could enter the tanker market and operate larger fleets throughacquisitions or consolidations and may be willing or able to accept lower prices than us, which could result in our achieving lower revenues from our vessels.Governmental and Other RegulationsSources of applicable rules and standardsShipping is one of the world’s most heavily regulated industries, and, in addition, it is subject to many industry standards. Government regulationsignificantly affects the ownership and operation of vessels. These regulations consist mainly of rules and standards established by international conventions,but they also include national, state, and local laws and regulations in force in jurisdictions where vessels may operate or are registered, and which arecommonly more stringent than international rules and standards. This is the case particularly in the United States and, increasingly, in Europe.A variety of governmental and private entities subject vessels to both scheduled and unscheduled inspections. These entities include local port authorities(the U.S. Coast Guard, harbor masters or equivalent entities), classification societies, flag state administration (country vessel of registry), and charterers,particularly terminal operators. Certain of these entities require vessel owners to obtain permits, licenses, and certificates for the operation of their vessels.Failure to maintain necessary permits or approvals could require a vessel owner to incur substantial costs or temporarily suspend operation of one or more ofits vessels.Heightened levels of environmental and quality concerns among insurance underwriters, regulators, and charterers continue to lead to greater inspection andsafety requirements on all vessels and may accelerate the scrapping of older vessels 36 Table of Contentsthroughout the industry. Increasing environmental concerns have created a demand for vessels that conform to stricter environmental standards. Vesselowners are required to maintain operating standards for all vessels that will emphasize operational safety, quality maintenance, continuous training of officersand crews and compliance with U.S. and international regulations.The International Maritime Organization, or IMO, has adopted a number of international conventions concerned with ship safety and with preventing,reducing or controlling pollution from ships. These fall into two main categories, consisting firstly of those concerned generally with ship safety standards,and secondly of those specifically concerned with measures to prevent pollution.Ship safety regulationIn the former category the primary international instrument is the Safety of Life at Sea Convention of 1974, as amended, or SOLAS, together with theregulations and codes of practice that form part of its regime. Much of SOLAS is not directly concerned with preventing pollution, but some of its safetyprovisions are intended to prevent pollution as well as promote safety of life and preservation of property. These regulations have been and continue to beregularly amended as new and higher safety standards are introduced with which we are required to comply.An amendment of SOLAS introduced the International Safety Management (ISM) Code, which has been effective since July 1998. Under the ISM Code theparty with operational control of a vessel is required to develop an extensive safety management system that includes, among other things, the adoption of asafety and environmental protection policy setting forth instructions and procedures for operating its vessels safely and describing procedures for respondingto emergencies. The ISM Code requires that vessel operators obtain a safety management certificate for each vessel they operate. This certificate evidencescompliance by a vessel’s management with code requirements for a safety management system. No vessel can obtain a certificate unless its manager has beenawarded a document of compliance, issued by the flag state for the vessel, under the ISM Code. Noncompliance with the ISM Code and other IMOregulations, such as the mandatory ship energy efficiency management plan (“SEEMP”) which is akin to a safety management plan and came into effect onJanuary 1, 2013, may subject a ship owner to increased liability, may lead to decreases in available insurance coverage for affected vessels, and may result inthe denial of access to, or detention in, some ports. For example, the United States Coast Guard and European Union authorities have indicated that vesselsnot in compliance with the ISM Code will be prohibited from trading in ports in the United States and European Union.Security RegulationsSince the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, there have been a variety of initiatives intended to enhance vessel security. On November 25, 2002, MTSAcame into effect. To implement certain portions of the MTSA, in July 2003, the U.S. Coast Guard issued regulations requiring the implementation of certainsecurity requirements aboard vessels operating in waters subject to the jurisdiction of the United States. Similarly, in December 2002, amendments to SOLAScreated a new chapter of the convention dealing specifically with maritime security. The new chapter went into effect on July 1, 2004, and imposes variousdetailed security obligations on vessels and port authorities, most of which are contained in the ISPS Code. Among the various requirements are: • on-board installation of automatic information systems to enhance vessel-to-vessel and vessel-to shore communications; • on-board installation of ship security alert systems; • the development of vessel security plans; and • compliance with flag state security certification requirements.The U.S. Coast Guard regulations, intended to be aligned with international maritime security standards, exempt non-U.S. vessels from MTSA vessel securitymeasures, provided such vessels had on board, by July 1, 2004, a valid ISSC that attests to the vessel’s compliance with SOLAS security requirements and theISPS Code.International regulations to prevent pollution from shipsIn the second main category of international regulation, the primary instrument is the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships, orMARPOL, which imposes environmental standards on the shipping industry set out in Annexes I-VI of MARPOL. These contain regulations for theprevention of pollution by oil (Annex I), by noxious liquid substances in bulk (Annex II), by harmful substances in packaged forms within the scope of theInternational Maritime Dangerous Goods Code (Annex III), by sewage (Annex IV), by garbage (Annex V), and by air emissions (Annex VI). 37 Table of ContentsThese regulations have been and continue to be regularly amended as new and higher standards of pollution prevention are introduced with which we arerequired to comply.For example, MARPOL Annex VI, together with the NOx Technical Code established thereunder, sets limits on sulphur oxide and nitrogen oxide emissionsfrom ship exhausts and prohibits deliberate emissions of ozone depleting substances, such as chlorofluorocarbons. It also includes a global cap on thesulphur content of fuel oil and allows for special areas to be established with more stringent controls on emissions. Originally adopted in September 1997,Annex VI came into force in May 2005 and was amended in October 2008 (as was the NOx Technical Code) to provide for progressively more stringent limitson such emissions from 2010 onwards. The revised Annex VI provides, in particular, for a reduction of the global sulfur cap, initially to 3.5% (from theprevious cap of 4.5%), with effect from January 1, 2012, then progressively reducing to 0.50% effective from January 1, 2020, subject to a feasibility reviewto be completed no later than 2018; and the establishment of new tiers of stringent nitrogen oxide emissions standards for marine engines, depending on theirdate of installation. We anticipate incurring costs in complying with these more stringent standards.The revised Annex VI further allows for designation, in response to proposals from member parties, of Emission Control Areas (ECAs) that impose acceleratedand/or more stringent requirements for control of sulfur oxide, particulate matter, and nitrogen oxide emissions. Such ECAs have been formally adopted forthe Baltic Sea and the North Sea including the English Channel and North America, including Canada and the United States. In addition, the United StatesCaribbean Sea ECA came into force on January 1, 2013having effect from January 1, 2014. For the currently-designated ECAs, much lower sulfur limits onfuel oil content are being phased in (1% from July 2010 and 0.1% from January 1, 2015), as well as nitrogen oxide after treatment requirements that willbecome applicable to the Baltic and North Sea ECAs in 2016. These more stringent fuel standards, when fully in effect, are expected to require measures suchas fuel switching, vessel modification adding distillate fuel storage capacity, or addition of exhaust gas cleaning scrubbers, to achieve compliance, and mayrequire installation and operation of further control equipment at significant increased cost.The revised Annex I to the MARPOL Convention entered into force in January 2007. It incorporates various amendments to the MARPOL Convention andimposes construction requirements for oil tankers delivered on or after January 1, 2010. On August 1, 2007, Regulation 12A (an amendment to Annex I) cameinto force imposing performance standards for accidental oil fuel outflow and requiring oil fuel tanks to be located inside the double-hull in all ships with anaggregate oil fuel capacity of 600 cubic meters and above, and which are delivered on or after August 1, 2010, including ships for which the buildingcontract is entered into on or after August 1, 2007 or, in the absence of a contract, for which keel is laid on or after February 1, 2008. All of our newbuildtanker vessels will comply with Regulation 12A.Greenhouse gas emissionsIn February 2005, the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change entered into force. Pursuant to the Kyoto Protocol,adopting countries are required to implement national programs to reduce emissions of certain gases, generally referred to as greenhouse gases, which aresuspected of contributing to global warming. Currently, the greenhouse gas emissions from international shipping do not come under the Kyoto Protocol.In December 2011, UN climate change talks took place in Durban and concluded with an agreement referred to as the Durban Platform for Enhanced Action.In preparation for the Durban Conference, the International Chamber of Shipping (“ICS”) produced a briefing document, confirming the shipping industry’scommitment to cut shipping emissions by 20% by 2020, with significant further reductions thereafter. The ICS called on the participants in the DurbanConference to give the IMO a clear mandate to deliver emissions reductions through market-based measures, for example a shipping industry environmentalcompensation fund. Notwithstanding the ICS’ request for global regulation of the shipping industry, the Durban Conference did not result in any proposalsspecifically addressing the shipping industry’s role in climate change. The European Union announced in April 2007 that it planned to expand the EuropeanUnion emissions trading scheme by adding vessels, and a proposal from the European Commission was expected if no global regime for reduction ofseaborne emissions had been agreed by the end of 2011. That deadline has now expired and it remains to be seen what position the EU takes in this regard inperiod ahead. As of January 31, 2013, the Commission stopped short of proposing that emissions from ships be included in the EU’s emissions-tradingscheme (“ETS”). However, on October 1, 2012, it announced that it would propose measures to monitor, verify and report on greenhouse gas emissions fromthe shipping sector in early 2013. This may be seen as indicative of an intention to maintain pressure on the international negotiating process. In the UnitedStates, in 2007 the California Attorney General and a coalition of environmental groups petitioned the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, or EPA, inOctober 2007 to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from ocean-going ships under the Clean Air Act, and in 2010 another coalition of environmental groupsfiled suit to require the EPA to do the same. Any passage of climate control legislation or other regulatory initiatives by the IMO, European Union, orindividual countries where we operate, including the U.S. that restrict emissions of greenhouse gases from vessels could require us to make significantfinancial expenditures we cannot predict with certainty at this time. 38 Table of ContentsOther international regulations to prevent pollutionIn addition to MARPOL, other more specialized international instruments have been adopted to prevent different types of pollution or environmental harmfrom ships. In February 2004, the IMO adopted an International Convention for the Control and Management of Ships’ Ballast Water and Sediments, or theBWM Convention. The BWM Convention’s implementing regulations call for a phased introduction of mandatory ballast water exchange requirements, tobe replaced in time with mandatory concentration limits. The BWM Convention will not enter into force until 12 months after it has been adopted by30 states, the combined merchant fleets of which represent not less than 35% of the gross tonnage of the world’s merchant shipping. To date, there has notbeen sufficient adoption of this standard by member-states representing enough of the gross tonnage of the world’s fleet for it to take force. However, as ofJanuary 31, 2013, the Convention has been ratified by 36 states, representing 29.07% of the global merchant shipping fleet’s gross tonnage and its entry-into-force with attendant compliance costs may therefore be anticipated in the foreseeable future.European regulationsEuropean regulations in the maritime sector are in general based on international law. However, since the Erika incident in 1999, the European Communityhas become increasingly active in the field of regulation of maritime safety and protection of the environment. It has been the driving force behind a numberof amendments of MARPOL (including, for example, changes to accelerate the time-table for the phase-out of single hull tankers, and to prohibit the carriagein such tankers of heavy grades of oil), and if dissatisfied either with the extent of such amendments or with the time-table for their introduction it has beenprepared to legislate on a unilateral basis. In some instances where it has done so, international regulations have subsequently been amended to the samelevel of stringency as that introduced in Europe, but the risk is well established that EU regulations may from time to time impose burdens and costs onshipowners and operators which are additional to those involved in complying with international rules and standards.In some areas of regulation the EU has introduced new laws without attempting to procure a corresponding amendment of international law. Notably, itadopted in 2005 a directive on ship-source pollution, imposing criminal sanctions for pollution not only where this is caused by intent or recklessness (whichwould be an offence under MARPOL), but also where it is caused by “serious negligence”. The directive could therefore result in criminal liability beingincurred in circumstances where it would not be incurred under international law. Experience has shown that in the emotive atmosphere often associated withpollution incidents, retributive attitudes towards ship interests have found expression in negligence being alleged by prosecutors and found by courts ongrounds which the international maritime community has found hard to understand. Moreover, there is skepticism that the notion of “serious negligence” islikely to prove any narrower in practice than ordinary negligence. Criminal liability for a pollution incident could not only result in us incurring substantialpenalties or fines but may also, in some jurisdictions, facilitate civil liability claims for greater compensation than would otherwise have been payable.United States environmental regulations and laws governing civil liability for pollutionEnvironmental legislation in the United States merits particular mention as it is in many respects more onerous than international laws, representing a high-water mark of regulation with which shipowners and operators must comply, and of liability likely to be incurred in the event of non-compliance or anincident causing pollution.U.S. federal legislation, including notably the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, or OPA, establishes an extensive regulatory and liability regime for the protectionand cleanup of the environment from oil spills, including cargo or bunker oil spills from tankers. OPA affects all owners and operators whose vessels trade inthe United States, its territories and possessions or whose vessels operate in United States waters, which includes the United States’ territorial sea and its 200nautical mile exclusive economic zone. Under OPA, vessel owners, operators and bareboat charterers are “responsible parties” and are jointly, severally andstrictly liable (unless the spill results solely from the act or omission of a third party, an act of God or an act of war) for all containment and clean-up costs andother damages arising from discharges or substantial threats of discharges, of oil from their vessels. In addition to potential liability under OPA as the relevantfederal legislation, vessel owners may in some instances incur liability on an even more stringent basis under state law in the particular state where thespillage occurred.Title VII of the Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Act of 2004, or the CGMTA, amended OPA to require the owner or operator of any non-tank vesselof 400 gross tons or more, that carries oil of any kind as a fuel for main propulsion, including bunkers, to prepare and submit a response plan for each vesselon or before August 8, 2005. The vessel response plans must include detailed information on actions to be taken by vessel personnel to prevent or mitigateany discharge or substantial threat of such a discharge of ore from the vessel due to operational activities or casualties.OPA currently limits liability of the responsible party for single-hull tank vessels over 3,000 gross tons liability to the greater of $3,200 per gross ton or $23.5million (this amount is reduced to $6.4 million if the vessel is less than 3,000 gross tons). 39 Table of ContentsFor tank vessels over 3,000 gross tons, other than a single-hull vessel, liability is limited to $2,000 per gross ton or $17.0 million (or $4.27 million for avessel less than 3,000 gross tons), whichever is greater. These amounts are periodically adjusted for inflation.These limits of liability do not apply if an incident was directly caused by violation of applicable United States federal safety, construction or operatingregulations or by a responsible party’s gross negligence or willful misconduct, or if the responsible party fails or refuses to report the incident or to cooperateand assist in connection with oil removal activities.In response to the Deepwater Horizon incident in the Gulf of Mexico, in 2010 the U.S. Congress has proposed, but has not formally adopted legislation thatwould amend OPA to mandate stronger safety standards and increased liability and financial responsibility for offshore drilling operations, but the bill didnot seek to change the OPA liability limits applicable to vessels. While Congressional activity on this topic is expected to continue to focus on offshorefacilities rather than on vessels generally, it cannot be known with certainty what form any such new legislative initiatives may take.In addition, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, or CERCLA, which applies to the discharge of hazardoussubstances (other than oil) whether on land or at sea, contains a similar liability regime and provides for cleanup, removal and natural resource damages.Liability under CERCLA is limited to the greater of $300 per gross ton or $0.5 million for vessels not carrying hazardous substances as cargo or residue,unless the incident is caused by gross negligence, willful misconduct, or a violation of certain regulations, in which case liability is unlimited.We currently maintain, for each of our owned vessels, insurance coverage against pollution liability risks in the amount of $1.0 billion per incident. Theinsured risks include penalties and fines as well as civil liabilities and expenses resulting from accidental pollution. However, this insurance coverage issubject to exclusions, deductibles and other terms and conditions. If any liabilities or expenses fall within an exclusion from coverage, or if damages from acatastrophic incident exceed the $1.0 billion limitation of coverage per incident, our cash flow, profitability and financial position could be adverselyimpacted.Under OPA, an owner or operator of a fleet of vessels is required only to demonstrate evidence of financial responsibility in an amount sufficient to cover thevessel in the fleet having the greatest maximum liability under OPA. Under the self-insurance provisions, the shipowner or operator must have a net worthand working capital, measured in assets located in the United States against liabilities located anywhere in the world, that exceeds the applicable amount offinancial responsibility. We have complied with the U.S. Coast Guard regulations by providing a certificate of responsibility from third party entities that areacceptable to the U.S. Coast Guard evidencing sufficient self-insurance.The U.S. Coast Guard’s regulations concerning certificates of financial responsibility provide, in accordance with OPA, that claimants may bring suit directlyagainst an insurer or guarantor that furnishes certificates of financial responsibility. In the event that such insurer or guarantor is sued directly, it is prohibitedfrom asserting any contractual defense that it may have had against the responsible party and is limited to asserting those defenses available to theresponsible party and the defense that the incident was caused by the willful misconduct of the responsible party. Certain organizations, which had typicallyprovided certificates of financial responsibility under pre-OPA laws, including the major protection and indemnity organizations, have declined to furnishevidence of insurance for vessel owners and operators if they are subject to direct actions or required to waive insurance policy defenses. This requirementmay have the effect of limiting the availability of the type of coverage required by the Coast Guard and could increase our costs of obtaining this insuranceas well as the costs of our competitors that also require such coverage.OPA specifically permits individual states to impose their own liability regimes with regard to oil pollution incidents occurring within their boundaries, andsome states’ environmental laws impose unlimited liability for oil spills. In some cases, states which have enacted such legislation have not yet issuedimplementing regulations defining vessels owners’ responsibilities under these laws. We intend to comply with all applicable state regulations in the portswhere our vessels call.The United States Clean Water Act prohibits the discharge of oil or hazardous substances in U.S. navigable waters and imposes strict liability in the form ofpenalties for unauthorized discharges. The Clean Water Act also imposes substantial liability for the costs of removal, remediation and damages andcomplements the remedies available under CERCLA. The EPA regulates the discharge of ballast water and other substances incidental to the normaloperation of vessels in U.S. waters using a Vessel General Permit, or VGP, system pursuant to the CWA, in order to combat the risk of harmful organisms thatcan travel in ballast water carried from foreign ports. Compliance with the conditions of the VGP is required for commercial vessels 79 feet in length or longer(other than commercial fishing vessels.) In November 2011, the EPA issued a revised draft Vessel General Permit that is expected to go into effect in 2013.This new VGP will impose a numeric standard to control the release of non-indigenous invasive species in ballast water discharges. In addition, through theCWA certification provisions that allow US states to place additional conditions on use of the VGP within state waters, a number of states have proposed orimplemented a variety of stricter ballast water requirements including, in some states, specific treatment standards. 40 Table of ContentsCompliance with new U.S. federal and state requirements could require the installation of equipment on our vessels to treat ballast water before it isdischarged or the implementation of other port facility disposal arrangements or procedures at potentially substantial cost, and/or otherwise restrict ourvessels from entering U.S. waters.The Federal Clean Air Act (“CAA”) requires the EPA to promulgate standards applicable to emissions of volatile organic compounds and other aircontaminants. Our vessels are subject to CAA vapor control and recovery standards (“VCS”) for cleaning fuel tanks and conducting other operations inregulated port areas, and to CAA emissions standards for so-called “Category 3 “marine diesel engines operating in U.S. waters. In April 2010, EPA adoptedregulations implementing the provision of MARPOL Annex VI regarding emissions from Category 3 marine diesel engines. Under these regulations, bothU.S. and foreign-flagged ships must comply with the applicable engine and fuel standards of MARPOL Annex VI, including the stricter North AmericaEmission Control Area (ECA) standards which took effect in August 2012, when they enter U.S. ports or operate in most internal U.S. waters including theGreat Lakes. MARPOL Annex VI requirements are discussed in greater detail above under “International regulations to prevent pollution from ships.” Wemay incur costs to install control equipment on our vessels to comply with the new standards.Also under the CAA, the U.S. Coast Guard has since 1990 regulated the safety of VCSs that are required under EPA and state rules. Our vessels operating inregulated port areas have installed VCSs that are compliant with EPA, state and U.S. Coast Guard requirements. In October 2010, the U.S. Coast Guardproposed a rule that would make its VCS requirements more compatible with new EPA and State regulations, reflect changes in VCS technology, and codifyexisting U.S. Coast Guard guidelines. It appears unlikely that the updated U.S. Coast Guard rule when finalized will impose a material increase in costs.We intend to comply with all applicable state and U.S. federal regulations in the ports where our vessels call.International laws governing civil liability to pay compensation or damagesWe operate a fleet of product and chemical tankers that are subject to national and international laws governing pollution from such vessels. Severalinternational conventions impose and limit pollution liability from vessels. An owner of a tanker vessel carrying a cargo of “persistent oil” as defined by theInternational Convention for Civil Liability for Oil Pollution Damage (the “CLC”) is subject under the convention to strict liability for any pollution damagecaused in a contracting state by an escape or discharge from cargo or bunker tanks. This liability is subject to a financial limit calculated by reference to thetonnage of the ship, and the right to limit liability may be lost if the spill is caused by the shipowner’s intentional or reckless conduct. Liability may also beincurred under the CLC for a bunker spill from the vessel even when she is not carrying such cargo, but is in ballast.When a tanker is carrying clean oil products that do not constitute “persistent oil” that would be covered under the CLC, liability for any pollution damagewill generally fall outside the CLC and will depend on other international conventions or domestic laws in the jurisdiction where the spillage occurs. Thesame principle applies to any pollution from the vessel in a jurisdiction which is not a party to the CLC. The CLC applies in over 100 jurisdictions aroundthe world, but it does not apply in the United States, where the corresponding liability laws such as the Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (The “OPA”) discussedbelow, are particularly stringent.In 2001, the IMO adopted the International Convention on Civil Liability for Bunker Oil Pollution Damage, or the Bunker Convention, which imposes strictliability on shipowners for pollution damage in jurisdictional waters of ratifying states caused by discharges of “bunker oil.” The Bunker Convention defines“bunker oil” as “any hydrocarbon mineral oil, including lubricating oil, used or intended to be used for the operation or propulsion of the ship, and anyresidues of such oil.” The Bunker Convention also requires registered owners of ships over a certain size to maintain insurance for pollution damage in anamount equal to the limits of liability under the applicable national or international limitation regime (but not exceeding the amount calculated inaccordance with the Convention on Limitation of Liability for Maritime Claims of 1976, as amended, or the 1976 Convention). The Bunker Conventionentered into force on November 21, 2008, and as of January 31, 2013 it was in effect in 68 states. In other jurisdictions liability for spills or releases of oilfrom ships’ bunkers continues to be determined by the national or other domestic laws in the jurisdiction where the events or damages occur.Outside the United States, national laws generally provide for the owner to bear strict liability for pollution, subject to a right to limit liability underapplicable national or international regimes for limitation of liability. The most widely applicable international regime limiting maritime pollution liabilityis the 1976 Convention. Rights to limit liability under the 1976 Convention are forfeited where a spill is caused by a shipowners’ intentional or recklessconduct. Some states have ratified the 1996 LLMC Protocol to the 1976 Convention, which provides for liability limits substantially higher than those setforth in the 1976 Convention to apply in such states. Finally, some jurisdictions are not a party to either the 1976 Convention or the 1996 LLMC Protocol,and, therefore, shipowners’ rights to limit liability for maritime pollution in such jurisdictions may be uncertain. 41 Table of ContentsInspection by Classification SocietiesEvery sea going vessel must be “classed” by a classification society. The classification society certifies that the vessel is “in class,” signifying that the vesselhas been built and maintained in accordance with the rules of the classification society and complies with applicable rules and regulations of the vessel’scountry of registry and the international conventions of which that country is a member. In addition, where surveys are required by international conventionsand corresponding laws and ordinances of a flag state, the classification society will undertake them on application or by official order, acting on behalf ofthe authorities concerned.The classification society also undertakes, on request, other surveys and checks that are required by regulations and requirements of the flag state. Thesesurveys are subject to agreements made in each individual case or to the regulations of the country concerned. For maintenance of the class, regular andextraordinary surveys of hull, machinery (including the electrical plant) and any special equipment classed are required to be performed as follows: • Annual Surveys: For ocean-going ships, annual surveys are conducted for the hull and the machinery (including the electrical plant) and, whereapplicable, for special equipment classed, at intervals of 12 months from the date of commencement of the class period indicated in the certificate. • Intermediate Surveys: Extended annual surveys are referred to as intermediate surveys and typically are conducted two and a half years aftercommissioning and each class renewal. Intermediate surveys may be carried out on the occasion of the second or third annual survey. • Class Renewal Surveys: Class renewal surveys, also known as special surveys, are carried out for the ship’s hull, machinery (including the electricalplant), and for any special equipment classed, at the intervals indicated by the character of classification for the hull. At the special survey, the vessel isthoroughly examined, including audio-gauging, to determine the thickness of its steel structure. Should the thickness be found to be less than classrequirements, the classification society would prescribe steel renewals. The classification society may grant a one year grace period for completion ofthe special survey. Substantial amounts of money may have to be spent for steel renewals to pass a special survey if the vessel experiences excessivewear and tear. In lieu of the special survey every four or five years, depending on whether a grace period was granted, a shipowner has the option ofarranging with the classification society for the vessel’s integrated hull or machinery to be on a continuous survey cycle, in which every part of thevessel would be surveyed within a five-year cycle.Risk of Loss and Liability InsuranceGeneralThe operation of any cargo vessel includes risks such as mechanical failure, physical damage, collision, property loss, and cargo loss or damage and businessinterruption due to political circumstances in foreign countries, hostilities and labor strikes. In addition, there is always an inherent possibility of marinedisaster, including oil spills and other environmental mishaps, and the liabilities arising from owning and operating vessels in international trade. The OPA,which imposes virtually unlimited liability upon owners, operators and demise charterers of any vessel trading in the United States exclusive economic zonefor certain oil pollution accidents in the United States, has made liability insurance more expensive for ship owners and operators trading in the United Statesmarket. While Navios Acquisition believes that its insurance coverage is adequate, not all risks can be insured, and there can be no guarantee that anyspecific claim will be paid, or that we will always be able to obtain adequate insurance coverage at reasonable rates.Hull and Machinery InsuranceNavios Acquisition has obtained marine hull and machinery and war risk insurance, which includes the risk of actual or constructive total loss, for all of itsvessels. The vessels will each be covered up to at least fair market value, with deductibles in amounts ranging between $100,000 and $250,000, dependingon the size of the tanker vessel. Navios Acquisition has also extended its war risk insurance to include war loss of hire for any loss of time to the vessel,including for physical repairs, caused by a warlike incident, including a piracy seizure.Navios Acquisition has arranged, as necessary, increased value insurance for its vessels. With the increased value insurance, in case of total loss of the vessel,Navios Acquisition will be able to recover the sum insured under the increased value policy in addition to the sum insured under the hull and machinerypolicy. Increased value insurance also covers excess liabilities that are not recoverable in full by the hull and machinery policies by reason of underinsurance. Navios Acquisition does not expect to maintain loss of hire insurance for its vessels. Loss of hire insurance covers business interruptions that resultin the loss of use of a vessel. 42 Table of ContentsProtection and Indemnity InsuranceProtection and indemnity insurance is provided by mutual protection and indemnity associations, or P&I Associations, which covers Navios Acquisition’sthird-party liabilities in connection with the operation of its ships. This includes third-party liability and other related expenses of injury or death of crew,passengers and other third parties, loss or damage to cargo, claims arising from collisions with other vessels, damage to other third-party property, pollutionarising from oil or other substances, and salvage, towing and other related costs, including wreck removal. Protection and indemnity insurance is a form ofmutual indemnity insurance, extended by protection and indemnity mutual associations.Navios Acquisition’s protection and indemnity insurance coverage for oil pollution is limited to $1.0 billion per event. The 13 P&I Associations thatcomprise the International Group insure approximately 95% of the world’s commercial tonnage and have entered into a pooling agreement to reinsure eachassociation’s liabilities. Each vessel that Navios Acquisition acquires will be entered with P&I Associations of the International Group. Under theInternational Group reinsurance program for the current policy year, each P&I club in the International Group is responsible for the first $9.0 million of everyclaim. In every claim the amount in excess of $9.0 million and up to $70.0 million is shared by the clubs under a pooling agreement. Any claim in excess of$70.0 million is reinsured by the International Group under the General Excess of Loss Reinsurance Contract. This policy currently provides an additional$2.0 billion of coverage for non-oil pollution claims. Further to this, overspill protection has been placed by the International Group for claims up to $1billion in excess of $2.07 billion, i.e. $3.07 billion in total. For passengers and crew claims the overall limit is $3.0 billion any one even any one vessel witha sub-limit of $2.0 billion for passengers.As a member of a P&I Association, which is a member of the International Group, Navios Acquisition will be subject to calls payable to the associationsbased on its claim records as well as the claim records of all other members of the individual associations, and members of the pool of P&I Associationscomprising the International Group. The P&I Associations’ policy year commences on February 20th. Calls are levied by means of Estimated Total Premiums(“ETP”) and the amount of the final installment of the ETP varies according to the actual total premium ultimately required by the club for a particular policyyear. Members have a liability to pay supplementary calls which might be levied by the board of directors of the club if the ETP is insufficient to coveramounts paid out by the club.Exchange ControlsUnder Marshall Islands law, there are currently no restrictions on the export or import of capital, including foreign exchange controls or restrictions that affectthe remittance of dividends, interest or other payments to non-resident holders of Navios Acquisition’s securities.FacilitiesWe do not own any real estate or other physical property. Our headquarters are located at 85 Akti Miaouli Street, Piraeus, Greece 185 38. We believe that ouroffice facilities are suitable and adequate for our business as it is presently conducted. We presently occupy office space provided by Navios Holdings.Navios Holdings has agreed that it will make such office space, as well as certain office and secretarial services, available to us, as may be required by us fromtime to time.Crewing and StaffThe Manager crews its vessels primarily with Greek, Filipino, Romanian, Russian and Ukranian officers and Filipino seamen. The Manager is responsible forselecting its Greek officers. For other nationalities, officers and seamen are referred to us by local crewing agencies. Navios Acquisition requires that all of itsseamen have the qualifications and licenses required to comply with international regulations and shipping conventions.Administrative ServicesOn May 28, 2010, Navios Acquisition entered into an administrative services agreement with Navios Holdings, expiring on May 28, 2015, pursuant to whichNavios Holdings provides certain administrative management services to Navios Acquisition, which include bookkeeping, audit and accounting services,legal and insurance services, administrative and clerical services, banking and financial services, advisory services, client and investor relations and otherservices. Navios Holdings is reimbursed for reasonable costs and expenses incurred in connection with the provision of these services. See “Item 7B-RelatedParty Transactions — the Administrative Services Agreement.” 43 Table of ContentsLegal ProceedingsTo the knowledge of management, there is no litigation currently pending or contemplated against us or any of our officers or directors in their capacity assuch.C. Organizational StructureThe table below lists the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries as of December 31, 2012. Navios Maritime Acquisition Corporation and Subsidiaries: Nature Country of IncorporationCompany Name Aegean Sea Maritime Holdings Inc. Sub-Holding Company Marshall Is.Amorgos Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is.Andros Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is.Antikithira Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is.Antiparos Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is.Amindra Shipping Co. Sub-Holding Company Marshall Is.Crete Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is.Folegandros Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is.Ikaria Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is.Ios Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Cayman Is.Kithira Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is.Kos Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is.Mytilene Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is.Navios Acquisition Finance (U.S.) Inc. Co-Issuer DelawareRhodes Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is.Navios Maritime Acquisition Corporation Holding Company Marshall Is.Serifos Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is.Shinyo Dream Limited Vessel Owning Company Hong KongShinyo Kannika Limited Vessel Owning Company Hong KongShinyo Kieran Limited Vessel Owning Company British Virgin Is.Shinyo Loyalty Limited Vessel Owning Company Hong KongShinyo Navigator Limited Vessel Owning Company Hong KongShinyo Ocean Limited Vessel Owning Company Hong KongShinyo Saowalak Limited Vessel Owning Company British Virgin Is.Sifnos Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is.Skiathos Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is.Skopelos Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Cayman Is.Syros Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is.Thera Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is.Tinos Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is.Oinousses Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is.Psara Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is.Antipsara Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. (1)Each company has the rights over a shipbuilding contract of a tanker vessel.D. Property, plants and equipmentOther than our vessels, we do not have any other material property, plant or equipment.Item 4A. Unresolved Staff CommentsNone.Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsOverviewNavios Acquisition was incorporated in the Republic of the Marshall Islands on March 14, 2008.On May 25, 2010, we consummated the Product and Chemical Tanker Acquisition, the acquisition of 13 vessels (11 product tankers and two chemicaltankers), for an aggregate purchase price of $457.7 million, including amounts to be paid for future contracted vessels to be delivered. On September 10,2010, we consummated the VLCC Acquisition, for an aggregate purchase price of $587.0 million. 44(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1) Table of ContentsOn October 21, 2010, Navios Acquisition and Navios Acquisition Finance (US) Inc., its wholly owned finance subsidiary (“Navios Acquisition Finance”),completed the sale of $400.0 million of 8 5/8% First Priority Ship Mortgage notes due 2017 (the “Existing Notes”).On May 26, 2011, Navios Acquisition and Navios Acquisition Finance completed the sale of $105.0 million of 8 5/8% first priority ship mortgage notes due2017 (the “Additional Notes”) at 102.25% plus accrued interest from May 1, 2011.Equity TransactionsOn September 17, 2010, Navios Acquisition issued 3,000 shares of preferred stock to an independent third party holder in connection with the payment ofcertain consultant and advisory fees. The preferred stock issued to the consultant was recorded at fair value as an expense in our statement of income totaling$5.6 million.On October 29, 2010, Navios Acquisition issued 540 shares of Series B Convertible preferred stock (fair value $1.6 million) to the seller of the two newbuildLR1 product tankers the Company recently acquired. The preferred stock contains a 2% per annum dividend payable quarterly starting on January 1, 2011,and mandatorily converts into shares of common stock at various dates in the future subject to the terms and conditions of such preferred stock. The holdersof the preferred stock also have the right to convert their shares to common stock subject to certain terms and conditions. The preferred stock does not haveany voting rights.On November 19, 2010, the Company completed the public offering of 6,500,000 shares of common stock at $5.50 per share and raised gross proceeds of$35.8 million. The net proceeds of this offering, including the underwriting discount of $1.8 million and excluding offering costs of $0.6 million wereapproximately $34.0 million.Pursuant to an Exchange Agreement entered into March 30, 2011, Navios Holdings exchanged 7,676,000 shares of Navios Acquisition’s common stock itheld for 1,000 shares of non-voting Series C Convertible Preferred Stock of Navios Acquisition. After giving effect to this exchange, Navios Holdings owned45.0% of our outstanding common stock. Each holder of shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock is entitled at their option at any time, after March 31,2013, to convert all or any of their outstanding shares into shares of our common stock determined by multiplying each share of Series C ConvertiblePreferred Stock to be converted by 7,676, subject to certain limitations. Upon the declaration of a common stock dividend, the holders of Series CConvertible Preferred Stock are entitled to receive dividends in an amount equal to the amount that would have been received on the number of shares of ourcommon stock into which the shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock held by each holder could be converted.On November 4, 2011, with respect to the shares held in escrow for the VLCC Acquisition, a total of 1,160,963 shares of common stock were released to thesellers and the remaining 217,159 were returned to Navios Acquisition in settlement of claims for breaches of representations and warranties attributable tothe sellers. The returned shares were cancelled on December 30, 2011.On each of August 31, 2012, October 31, 2012 and February 13, 2013, Navios Acquisition issued 300 shares (900 in the aggregate) of its authorized Series DPreferred Stock (nominal value $9.0 million) to a shipyard, in partial settlement of the purchase price of the three newbuild LR1 product tankers, the NaveCassiopeia, the Nave Cetus and the Nave Rigel. The preferred stock contains a 6% per annum dividend payable quarterly, starting one year after delivery ofeach vessel. The Series D Preferred Stock will mandatorily convert into shares of common stock 30 months after the issuance, at a price per share of commonstock equal to $10.00. The holder of the preferred stock shall have the right to convert the shares of preferred stock into common stock prior to the scheduledmaturity date at a price of $7.00 per share of common stock. The preferred stock does not have any voting rights. Navios Acquisition is obligated to redeemthe Series D Preferred Stock (or converted common shares), at the holder’s option exercisable beginning 18 months after the issuance, at par payable at up to12 equal quarterly installments. The convertible preferred stock is classified as temporary equity (i.e. apart from permanent equity) as a result of theredemption feature upon exercise of the put option granted to the holder of the Series D Preferred Stock.In February 2013, Navios Acquisition completed multiple offerings, issuing a total of 35,246,791 shares of its common stock, at a price of $2.85 per sharerepresenting gross proceeds of $100.5 million. The offerings were conducted as follows: • The first registered direct offering of 7,719,300 shares of common stock was completed on February 21, 2013, raising $22.0 million ofgross proceeds. The net proceeds of this offering including the agents’ fees of $0.9 million and excluding estimated offering costs ofapproximately $0.3 million, were $21.1 million. • The second registered direct offering of 9,825,000 shares of common stock was completed on February 26, 2013, raising $28.0 million ofgross proceeds. The net proceeds of this offering, including the agents’ fees of $1.1 million and excluding estimated offering costs ofapproximately $0.3 million, were $26.9 million. • In addition Navios Holdings and certain members of the management of Navios Acquisition, Navios Holdings and Navios Partnerspurchased an aggregate of 17,702,491 shares of common stock in a private placement that was completed on February 26, 2013 raising$50.5 million of gross proceeds. The net proceeds of this private placement, including the agents’ fees of $2.0 million, were $48.4million. 45 Table of ContentsAs of March 21, 2013 Navios Acquisition had outstanding: 75,764,204 shares of common stock, 4,540 shares of preferred stock and 900 shares of convertiblepreferred stock, 6,037,994 public warrants. Included in the number of shares and warrants are 12,752 units (one unit consists of one share of common stockand one warrant).Fleet DevelopmentOn January 27, 2011, Navios Acquisition took delivery of the Nave Polaris, a 25,145 dwt South Korean-built chemical tanker, for a total cost of $31.7million. Cash paid was $4.5 million and $27.2 million was transferred from vessel deposits.On June 8, 2011, Navios Acquisition took delivery of a 297,066 dwt VLCC, the Shinyo Kieran, from a Chinese shipyard, for a total cost of $119.4 million.Cash paid was $29.3 million and $90.1 million was transferred from vessel deposits.On July 12, 2011, Navios Acquisition took delivery of the Bull, a 2009 — built MR2 product tanker vessel of 50,542 dwt and attached time charter, for atotal cost of $42.4 million that was paid in cash. Favorable lease terms recognized through this transaction amounted to $5.1 million and the balance of$37.3 million was classified under vessels, net.On July 18, 2011, Navios Acquisition took delivery of the Buddy, a 2009-built MR2 product tanker vessel of 50,470 dwt and attached time charter, for atotal cost of $42.5 million that was paid in cash. Favorable lease terms recognized through this transaction amounted to $5.2 million and the balance of$37.3 million was classified under vessels, net.On November 14, 2011, Navios Acquisition took delivery of the Nave Andromeda, a 75,000 dwt LR1 South Korean — built product tanker, for a total cost of$44.3 million. Cash paid was $27.0 million and $17.3 million was transferred from vessel deposits.On January 20, 2012, Navios Acquisition took delivery of the Nave Estella, a 75,000 dwt South Korean —built LR1 product tanker, for a total cost of $44.6million. Cash paid was $11.0 million and $33.6 million was transferred from vessel deposits.On July 31, 2012, Navios Acquisition took delivery of the Nave Atria, a 49,992 dwt South Korean —built MR2 product tanker, for a total cost of $37.6million. Cash paid was $9.0 million and $28.6 million was transferred from vessel deposits.On August 31, 2012, Navios Acquisition took delivery of the Nave Cassiopeia, a 74,711 dwt South Korean —built LR1 product tanker, for a total cost of$43.8 million. Cash paid was $27.3 million, $3.0 million shares of Series D Preferred Stock were issued and $13.5 million was transferred from vesseldeposits.On October 30, 2012, Navios Acquisition took delivery of the Nave Cetus, a 74,581 dwt South Korean —built LR1 product tanker, for a total cost of $44.0million. Cash paid was $27.5 million, $3.0 million shares of Series D Preferred Stock were issued and $13.5 million was transferred from vessel deposits.On November 9, 2012, Navios Acquisition took delivery of the Nave Aquila, a 49,991 dwt South Korean —built MR2 product tanker, for a total cost of $37.8million. Cash paid was $12.7 million and $25.1 million was transferred from vessel deposits.On January 24, 2013, Navios Acquisition took delivery of the Nave Bellatrix, a 49,999 dwt MR2 product tanker vessel, from a South Korean shipyard.On February 13, 2013, Navios acquisition took delivery of the Nave Rigel, a 74,673 dwt LR1 product tanker vessel, from a South Korean shipyard. 46 Table of ContentsNavios Maritime Acquisition Corporation andSubsidiaries: Country of Statement of operations Nature Incorporation 2012 2011 2010Company Name Aegean Sea Maritime Holdings Inc. Sub-Holding Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Amorgos Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Andros Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Antikithira Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 6/7 - 12/31 — Antiparos Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Amindra Shipping Co. Sub-Holding Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 4/28 - 12/31 — Crete Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Folegandros Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 10/26 - 12/31Ikaria Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Ios Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Cayman Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Kithira Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 6/7 - 12/31 — Kos Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Mytilene Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Navios Acquisition Finance (U.S.) Inc. Co-Issuer Delaware 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 10/05 -12/31Navios Maritime Acquisition Corporation Holding Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31Rhodes Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Serifos Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 10/26 -12/31Shinyo Dream Limited Vessel Owning Company Hong Kong 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 9/10 - 12/31Shinyo Kannika Limited Vessel Owning Company Hong Kong 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 9/10 - 12/31Shinyo Kieran Limited Vessel Owning Company British Virgin Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 9/10 - 12/31Shinyo Loyalty Limited Vessel Owning Company Hong Kong 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 9/10 - 12/31Shinyo Navigator Limited Vessel Owning Company Hong Kong 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 9/10 - 12/31Shinyo Ocean Limited Vessel Owning Company Hong Kong 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 9/10 - 12/31Shinyo Saowalak Limited Vessel Owning Company British Virgin Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 9/10 - 12/31Sifnos Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Skiathos Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Skopelos Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Cayman Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Syros Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Thera Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Tinos Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Oinousses Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 10/5 -12/31 — Psara Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 10/5 - 12/31 — Antipsara Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 10/5 - 12/31 — (1)Each company has the rights over a shipbuilding contract of a tanker vessel.Our ChartersFor the year ended December 31, 2012, Navios Acquisition’s customers representing 10% or more of total revenue were, Dalian Ocean Shipping Co., and STXPanocean Co. LTD which accounted for 43.3% and 10.7%, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2011, Navios Acquisition’s customers representing10% or more of total revenue were, Dalian Ocean Shipping Co., Blue light Chartering Inc and Jacob Tank Chartering GMBH &CO. KG. which accounted for43.9%, 11.5% and 11.3%, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2010, Jacob Tank Chartering GMBH & CO. KG, SK Shipping Company Ltd,DOSCO, Formosa Petrochemical Corporation, Blue Light Chartering Inc and Navig8 Chemicals Shipping and Trading Co accounted for 42.5%, 18.6%,12.9%, 12.9% and 10.9%, respectively, of Navios Acquisition’s revenue. No other customers accounted 10% or more of total revenue for any of the yearspresented.Our revenues are driven by the number of vessels in the fleet, the number of days during which the vessels operate and our charter hire rates, which, in turn,are affected by a number of factors, including: • the duration of the charters; • the level of spot and long-term market rates at the time of charter; • decisions relating to vessel acquisitions and disposals; • the amount of time spent positioning vessels; • the amount of time that vessels spend undergoing repairs and upgrades in drydock; • the age, condition and specifications of the vessels; and • the aggregate level of supply and demand in the tanker shipping industry.Time charters are available for varying periods, ranging from a single trip (spot charter) to long-term which may be any years. In general, a long-term timecharter assures the vessel owner of a consistent stream of revenue. Operating the vessel in the spot market affords the owner greater spot market opportunity,which may result in high rates when vessels are in high demand or low rates when vessel availability exceeds demand. We intend to operate our vessels in amix of short-term and long-term charter market. Vessel charter rates are affected by world economics, international events, weather conditions, strikes,governmental policies, supply and demand and many other factors that might be beyond our control. 47(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1) Table of ContentsWe could lose a customer or the benefits of a charter if: • the customer fails to make charter payments because of its financial inability, disagreements with us or otherwise; • the customer exercises certain rights to terminate the charter the vessel; • the customer terminates the charter because we fail to deliver the vessel within a fixed period of time, the vessel is lost or damagedbeyond repair, there are serious deficiencies in the vessel or prolonged periods of off-hire, or we default under the charter; or • a prolonged force majeure event affecting the customer, including damage to or destruction of relevant production facilities, war orpolitical unrest prevents us from performing services for that customer.If we lose a charter, we may be unable to re-deploy the related vessel on terms as favorable to us due to the long-term nature of most charters and the cyclicalnature of the industry or we may be forced to charter the vessel on the spot market at then market rates which may be less favorable than the charter that hasbeen terminated. The loss of any of our customers, time charters or vessels, or a decline in payments under our charters, could have a material adverse effecton our business, results of operations and financial condition and our ability to make cash distributions in the event we are unable to replace such customer,time charter or vessel.Under some of our time charters, either party may terminate the charter contract in the event of war in specified countries or in locations that wouldsignificantly disrupt the free trade of the vessel. Some of the time charters covering our vessels require us to return to the charterer, upon the loss of the vessel,all advances paid by the charterer but not earned by us.Vessels OperationsUnder our charters, our vessel manager is generally responsible for commercial, technical, health and safety and other management services related to thevessels’ operation, and the charterer is responsible for bunkering and substantially all of the vessel voyage costs, including canal tolls and port charges.Pursuant to a Management Agreement dated May 28, 2010, Navios Tankers Management Inc. (the “Manager”), a subsidiary of Navios Holdings, provides forfive years from the closing of the Company’s initial vessel acquisition, commercial and technical management services to Navios Acquisition’s vessels for adaily fee of $6,000 per owned MR2 product tanker and chemical tanker vessel and $7,000 per owned LR1 product tanker vessel and $10,000 per VLCCtanker vessel for the first two years. On May 4, 2012, Navios Acquisition amended its existing Management Agreement with the Manager, to fix the fees forship management services of its owned fleet at current rates for two additional years, through May 28, 2014. This daily fee covers all of the vessels’ operatingexpenses, other than certain fees and costs. During the remaining one year of the term of the Management Agreement, Navios Acquisition expects it willreimburse Navios Holdings for all of the actual operating costs and expenses it incurs in connection with the management of its fleet. Actual operating costsand expenses will be determined in a manner consistent with how the initial fixed fees were determined. Drydocking expenses are fixed for the first four yearsunder these agreements for up to $0.3 million per LR1 and MR2 product tanker vessel and will be reimbursed at cost for VLCC vessels. Commencing as ofMarch 30, 2012, Navios Acquisition can, upon request to the Manager, partially or fully defer the reimbursement of drydocking and other extraordinary feesand expenses under the Agreement to a later date, but not later than January 4, 2014, and if reimbursed on a later date, such amounts will bear interest at a rateof 1% per annum over LIBOR. Commencing as of September 28, 2012, Navios Acquisition could, upon request, reimburse the Manager partially or fully, forany fixed management fees outstanding for a period of not more than nine months under the Agreement at a later date, but not later than December 31, 2014,and if reimbursed on a later date, such amounts will bear interest at a rate of 1% per annum over LIBOR.Extraordinary costs and expenses include fees and costs resulting from: • time spent on insurance and salvage claims; • time spent vetting and pre-vetting the vessels by any charterers in excess of 10 days per vessel per year; • the deductible of any insurance claims relating to the vessels or for any claims that are within such deductible range; • the significant increase in insurance premiums which are due to factors such as “acts of God” outside the control of the Manager; • repairs, refurbishment or modifications, including those not covered by the guarantee of the shipbuilder or by the insurance covering thevessels, resulting from maritime accidents, collisions, other accidental damage or unforeseen events (except to the extent that suchaccidents, collisions, damage or events are due to the fraud, gross negligence or willful misconduct of the Manager, its employees or itsagents, unless and to the extent otherwise covered by insurance); • expenses imposed due to any improvement, upgrade or modification to, structural changes with respect to the installation of newequipment aboard any vessel that results from a change in, an introduction of new, or a change in the interpretation of, applicable laws, atthe recommendation of the classification society for that vessel or otherwise; 48 Table of Contents • costs associated with increases in crew employment expenses resulting from an introduction of new, or a change in the interpretation of,applicable laws or resulting from the early termination of the charter of any vessel; • any taxes, dues or fines imposed on the vessels or the Manager due to the operation of the vessels; • expenses incurred in connection with the sale or acquisition of a vessel such as inspections and technical assistance; and • any similar costs, liabilities and expenses that were not reasonably contemplated by us and the Manager as being encompassed by or acomponent of the fixed daily fees at the time the fixed daily fees were determined.Payment of any extraordinary fees or expenses to the Manager could significantly increase our vessel operating expenses and impact our results ofoperations.During the remaining term of the Management Agreement, we expect that we will reimburse the Manager for all of the actual operating costs and expenses itincurs in connection with the management of our fleet.Administrative ServicesOn May 28, 2010, Navios Acquisition entered into an administrative services agreement with Navios Holdings, expiring on May 28, 2015, pursuant to whicha subsidiary of Navios Holdings provides certain administrative management services to Navios Acquisition which include: rent, bookkeeping, audit andaccounting services, legal and insurance services, administrative and clerical services, banking and financial services, advisory services, client and investorrelations and other. Navios Holdings is reimbursed for reasonable costs and expenses incurred in connection with the provision of these services.A. Operating resultsTrends and Factors Affecting Our Future Results of OperationsWe believe the principal factors that will affect our future results of operations are the economic, regulatory, political and governmental conditions that affectthe shipping industry generally and that affect conditions in countries and markets in which our vessels engage in business. Other key factors that will befundamental to our business, future financial condition and results of operations include: • the demand for seaborne transportation services; • the ability of Navios Holdings’ commercial and chartering operations to successfully employ our vessels at economically attractive rates,particularly as our fleet expands and our charters expire; • the effective and efficient technical management of our vessels; • Navios Holdings’ ability to satisfy technical, health, safety and compliance standards of major commodity traders; and • the strength of and growth in the number of our customer relationships, especially with major commodity traders.In addition to the factors discussed above, we believe certain specific factors will impact our combined and consolidated results of operations. These factorsinclude: • the charter hire earned by our vessels under our charters; • our access to capital required to acquire additional vessels and/or to implement our business strategy; • our ability to sell vessels at prices we deem satisfactory; • our level of debt and the related interest expense and amortization of principal; and • the level of any dividend to our stockholders. 49 Table of ContentsPeriod over Period ComparisonsYear Ended December 31, 2012 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2011The following table presents consolidated revenue and expense information for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. This information was derivedfrom the audited consolidated financial statements of Navios Acquisition for the respective periods. (in thousands of U.S. dollars) For the YearEndedDecember 31,2012 For the YearEndedDecember 31,2011 Revenue $151,097 $121,925 Time charter expenses (2,824) (3,499) Direct vessel expenses (2,622) (633)Management fees (47,043) (35,679) General and administrative expenses (3,853) (4,241) Write-off of deferred finance costs — (935) Depreciation and amortization (49,644) (38,638) Interest income 445 1,414 Interest expenses and finance cost, net (49,432) (43,165) Other income/(expense), net 78 (406) Net loss $(3,798) $(3,857) Set forth below are selected historical and statistical data for Navios Acquisition for each of the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 that we believemay be useful in better understanding Navios Acquisition’s financial position and results of operations. Year EndedDecember 31,2012 Year EndedDecember 31,2011 FLEET DATA Available days 5,786 4,053 Operating days 5,751 4,004 Fleet utilization % 99.4% 98.8% Vessels operating at period end 19 14 AVERAGE DAILY RESULTS Time Charter Equivalent per day $25,625 $29,218 (1)Available days for the fleet are total calendar days the vessels were in Navios Acquisition’s possession for the relevant period after subtracting off-hiredays associated with major repairs, drydocking or special surveys. The shipping industry uses available days to measure the number of days in arelevant period during which vessels should be capable of generating revenues.(2)Operating days: Operating days are the number of available days in the relevant period less the aggregate number of days that the vessels are off-hiredue to any reason, including unforeseen circumstances. The shipping industry uses operating days to measure the aggregate number of days in arelevant period during which vessels actually generate revenues.(3)Fleet utilization: Fleet utilization is the percentage of time that Navios Acquisition’s vessels were available for generating revenue, and is determinedby dividing the number of operating days during a relevant period by the number of available days during that period. The shipping industry uses fleetutilization to measure a company’s efficiency in finding suitable employment for its vessels.(4)Time Charter Equivalent: Time Charter Equivalent is defined as voyage and time charter revenues less voyage expenses during a relevant perioddivided by the number of available days during the period.For the year ended December 31, 2012, Navios Acquisition had 5,786 available days, after it took delivery of the Shinyo Kieran in June 2011, the Bull andthe Buddy in July 2011, the Nave Andromeda in November 2011, the Nave Estella in January 2012, the Nave Atria in July 2012, the Nave Cassiopeia inAugust 2012, the Nave Cetus in October 2012 and the Nave Aquila in November 2012. There were 4,053 available days in the comparative period in 2011.Revenue: Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2012 increased by $29.2 million or 24.0% to $151.1 million, as compared to $121.9 million for the sameperiod in 2011. The increase was mainly attributable to the acquisition of the vessels mentioned above. As a result of the vessel acquisitions, available daysof the fleet increased to 5,786 days for the year ended December 31, 2012, as compared to 4,053 days for year ended December 31, 2011. TCE decreased to$25,625 for the year ended December 31, 2012, from $29,218 for the year ended December 31, 2011.Time charter expenses: Time charter expenses for the year ended December 31, 2012 decreased by $0.7 million to $2.8 million, as compared to $3.5 millionfor the year ended December 31, 2011. The decrease was attributable to a: (a) $0.4 million decrease in bunker costs; (b) $0.1 million decrease in portexpenses; and (c) $0.6 million decrease in miscellaneous voyage expenses, partially offset by a $0.4 million increase in broker commission costs. Timecharter expenses are expensed over the period of the time charter. 50(1)(2)(3)(4) Table of ContentsDirect vessel expenses: Direct vessel expenses, comprised of the amortization of dry dock and special survey costs, of three VLCC vessels that werecompleted in August 2011, October 2011 and April 2012, respectively, and of two LR1 product tankers that were completed in May 2012 and June 2012,respectively, amounted to $2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. Direct vessel expenses for the comparative period in 2011 were $0.6 millionand were related to dry dock and special survey costs of two VLCC vessels.Management fees: Management fees for the year ended December 31, 2012 increased by $11.3 million to $47.0 million, as compared to $35.7 million for theyear ended December 31, 2011. The increase was attributable to the increase in the number of vessels operating under Navios Acquisition’s fleet. Pursuant tothe Management Agreement dated May 28, 2010, the Manager, provides for five years from the closing of the vessels’ acquisition, commercial and technicalmanagement services to Navios Acquisition’s vessels for a daily fee of $6,000 per owned MR2 product tanker and chemical tanker vessel, $7,000 per ownedLR1 product tanker vessel and $10,000, per owned VLCC vessel for the first two years. On May 4, 2012, Navios Acquisition amended its existingManagement Agreement with the Manager, to fix the fees for ship management services of its owned fleet at current rates for two additional years, throughMay 28, 2014. This daily fee covers all of the vessels’ operating expenses, other than certain extraordinary fees and costs. During the remaining term of themanagement agreement, Navios Acquisition will reimburse the Manager for all of the actual operating costs and expenses it incurs in connection with themanagement of its fleet. Actual operating costs and expenses will be determined in a manner consistent with how the initial fixed fees were determined.Drydocking expenses are fixed for the first four years under these agreements for up to $0.3 million per LR1 and MR2 product tanker vessel and will bereimbursed at cost for VLCC vessels.General and administrative expenses: Total general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2012 decreased by $0.3 million or 7.1% to$3.9 million compared to $4.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The decrease was mainly attributable to a: (a) $0.1 million decrease intravelling expenses; (b) $0.3 decrease in consulting fees; (c) $0.5 million decrease in audit, professional and other fees partially offset by a $0.6 millionincrease in administrative expenses paid to the Manager due to the increased number of vessels in Navios Acquisition’s fleet. On May 28, 2010, NaviosAcquisition entered into an administrative services agreement with Navios Holdings, expiring on May 28, 2015, pursuant to which a subsidiary of NaviosHoldings provides certain administrative management services to Navios Acquisition which include: rent, bookkeeping, audit and accounting services, legaland insurance services, administrative and clerical services, banking and financial services, advisory services, client and investor relations and other. NaviosHoldings is reimbursed for reasonable costs and expenses incurred in connection with the provision of these services. For the years ended December 31, 2012and 2011, the expenses charged by Navios Holdings for administrative services were $2.1 million and $1.5 million, respectively. The remaining balance of$1.8 million and $2.7 million of general and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, related to legal,consulting, travel and professional fees including audit fees.Write-off deferred financing costs: In connection with the cancellation of certain committed credit in June 2011, the deferred finance fees in the amount of$0.9 million were written-off in the Statement of Operations.Depreciation and amortization: Depreciation and amortization increased by $11.0 million to $49.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 ascompared to $38.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase of $11.0 million was attributable to: (a) an increase in depreciation expense of$8.7 million due to the acquisitions of the vessel the Nave Polaris in January 2011, the Shinyo Kieran in June 2011, the Buddy and the Bull in July 2011 ,the Nave Andromeda in November 2011, the Nave Estella in January 2012, the Nave Atria in July 2012, the Nave Cassiopeia in August 2012, the Nave Cetusin October 2012 and the Nave Aquila in November 2012; and (b) an increase in amortization expense of $2.3 million due to the favorable and unfavorablelease terms that were recognized in relation to the acquisition of the rights on the time charter-out contracts of the vessels. Depreciation of vessel is calculatedusing an estimated useful life of 25 years for the date the vessel was originally delivered from the shipyard. Intangible assets are amortized over the contractperiods, which range from 3.17 to 15.00 years.Interest income: Interest income for year ended December 31, 2012 decreased by $1.0 million to $0.4 million compared to $1.4 million for the year endedDecember 31, 2011.Interest expense and finance cost, net: Interest expense and finance cost, net for the year ended December 31, 2012 increased by $6.2 million to$49.4 million, as compared to $43.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase was due to: (a) the increase in average outstanding loanbalance to $486.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2012 from 327.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2011; and (b) the full effect of theAdditional Notes, which were issued on May 26, 2011. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the outstanding loan balance under Navios Acquisition’s creditfacilities was $1,029.1 million and $885.4 million, respectively, and the weighted average interest rate as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 was 3.25% and3.16%, respectively. 51 Table of ContentsOther income/(expense), net: Other income/(expense), net increased to a $0.1 million income for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to $0.4 millionexpense for the same period in 2011. The increase of $0.5 million was mainly attributable to a: (a) $0.3 million decrease of claim reserves; and (b) $0.2million increase in miscellaneous income.Year Ended December 31, 2011 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2010The following table presents consolidated revenue and expense information for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. This information was derivedfrom the audited consolidated financial statements of Navios Acquisition for the respective periods. Year endedDecember 31,2011 Year endedDecember 31,2010 Revenue $121,925 $33,568 Time charter expenses (3,499) (355) Direct vessel expenses (633) — Management fees (35,679) (9,752)General and administrative expenses (4,241) (1,902) Share based compensation — (2,140) Transaction costs — (8,019) Depreciation and amortization (38,638) (10,120) Prepayment penalties & write-off of deferred finance fees (935) (5,441) Interest income 1,414 862 Interest expenses and finance cost, net (43,165) (10,651) Other (expense)/income, net (406) 404 Net loss $(3,857) $(13,546) Set forth below are selected historical and statistical data for Navios Acquisition for each of the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 that we believemay be useful in better understanding Navios Acquisition’s financial position and results of operations. Year endedDecember 31,2011 Year endedDecember 31,2010 FLEET DATA Available days 4,053 1,104 Operating days 4,004 1,096 Fleet utilization 98.8% 99.3% Vessels operating at period end 14 9 AVERAGE DAILY RESULTS Time Charter Equivalent per day $29,218 $30,087 (1)Available days: Available days is the total number of days a vessel is controlled by a company less the aggregate number of days that the vessel is off-hire due to scheduled repairs or repairs under guarantee, vessel upgrades or special surveys. The shipping industry uses available days to measure thenumber of days in a period during which vessels should be capable of generating revenues.(2)Operating days: Operating days is the number of available days in a period less the aggregate number of days that the vessels are off-hire due to anyreason, including lack of demand or unforeseen circumstances. The shipping industry uses operating days to measure the aggregate number of days in aperiod during which vessels actually generate revenues.(3)Fleet utilization: Fleet utilization is obtained by dividing the number of operating days during a period by the number of available days during theperiod. The shipping industry uses fleet utilization to measure a company’s efficiency in finding suitable employment for its vessels and minimizingthe amount of days that its vessels are off-hire for reasons other than scheduled repairs or repairs under guarantee, vessel upgrades, special surveys orvessel positioning.(4)Time Charter Equivalent: Time Charter Equivalent is defined as voyage and time charter revenues less voyage expenses during a period divided by thenumber of available days during the period. The TCE rate is a standard shipping industry performance measure used primarily to present the actualdaily earnings generated by vessels on various types of charter contracts for the number of available days of the fleet. 52(1)(2)(3)(4) Table of ContentsFor the year ended December 31, 2011, Navios Acquisition had 4,053 available days, after it took delivery of the vessel Nave Cielo (ex. Colin Jacob) onJune, 2010, Nave Ariadne (ex. Ariadne Jacob) on July 2010, seven VLCCs on September 10, 2010, of which the Shinyo Kieran was delivered in June 2011,the vessel Nave Cosmos on October 2010, the Nave Polaris in January 2011, the Buddy and the Bull in July 2011 and the Nave Andromeda in November2011. There were 1,104 available days in the comparative period in 2010.Revenue: Revenue for the year ended December 31, 2011 increased by $88.3 million or 262.8% to $121.9 million, as compared to $33.6 million for the yearended 2010. The increase was mainly attributable to the acquisitions of the Nave Cielo and the Nave Ariadne in July 2010, seven VLCCs in September 2010,of which the Shinyo Kieran was delivered in June 2011, the Nave Cosmos in October 2010, the Nave Polaris in January 2011, the Buddy and the Bull in July2011 and the Nave Andromeda in November 2011 and a $3,704 early termination compensation fee. As a result of the vessel acquisitions described above,available days of the fleet increased to 4,053 days for the year ended December 31, 2011, as compared to 1,104 days for the year ended December 31, 2010.The TCE rate decreased to $29,218 for the year ended December 31, 2011, from $30,087 for the year ended December 31, 2010.Time Charter Expenses: Time charter expenses for the year ended December 31, 2011 increased by $3.1 million to $3.5 million, as compared to $0.4 millionfor the year ended December 31, 2010. The increase was attributable to brokerage commissions and other miscellaneous expenses, due to the increasednumber of vessels operating in Navios Acquisition’s fleet. Time charter expenses are expensed over the period of the time charter.Direct vessel expenses: Direct vessel expenses, comprised of the amortization of dry dock and special survey costs, of two VLCC vessels that were completedin August 5, 2011 and October 3, 2011, respectively, amounted to $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. There were no direct vessel expensesfor the comparative period in 2010.Management Fees: Management fees for the year ended December 31, 2011 increased by $25.9 million to $35.7 million, as compared to $9.8 million for theyear ended December 31, 2010. The increase was attributable to the increase in the number of vessels operating under Navios Acquisition’s fleet. Pursuant toa Management Agreement dated May 28, 2010, a subsidiary of Navios Holdings, provides for five years from the closing of the Product and Chemical TankerAcquisition, commercial and technical management services to Navios Acquisition’s vessels for a daily fee of $6,000 per owned MR2 product tanker andchemical tanker vessel, $7,000 per owned LR1 product tanker vessel and $10,000 per VLCC vessel for the first two years with the fixed daily fees adjustedfor the remainder of the term based on then-current market fees. This daily fee covers all of the vessels’ operating expenses, other than certain fees and costs.During the remaining three years of the term of the Management Agreement, Navios Acquisition expects it will reimburse Navios Holdings for all of theactual operating costs and expenses it incurs in connection with the management of its fleet. Actual operating costs and expenses will be determined in amanner consistent with how the initial fixed fees were determined. Drydocking expenses are fixed under this agreement for up to $0.3 million per vesselchemical LR1 and MR2 product and are reimbursed at cost for VLCC vessels.General and Administrative Expenses: Total general and administrative fees for the year ended December 31, 2011 increased by $2.3 million or 121% to$4.2 million compared to $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The increase was mainly attributable to the increase in administrative expensespaid to the Manager due to the increased number of vessels in Navios Acquisition’s fleet.On May 28, 2010, Navios Acquisition entered into an administrative services agreement with Navios Holdings, expiring on May 28, 2015, pursuant to whicha subsidiary of Navios Holdings provides certain administrative management services to Navios Acquisition which include: rent, bookkeeping, audit andaccounting services, legal and insurance services, administrative and clerical services, banking and financial services, advisory services, client and investorrelations and other. Navios Holdings is reimbursed for reasonable costs and expenses incurred in connection with the provision of these services. For theyears ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the expenses charged by Navios Holdings for administrative services were $1.5 million and $0.4 million,respectively. The remaining balance of $2.7 million and $1.5 million of general and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2011 and2010, respectively, related to legal and professional fees including audit fees.Share-based compensation: On June 11, 2008, Navios Holdings transferred 290,000 Sponsor Units to our officers and directors. Each Sponsor Unit consistedof one warrant and one share of common stock and they vested only upon a successful business combination. As such, on May 28, 2010, we recorded anexpense of $2.1 million representing the fair value of the units on that date with equal increase in our Additional Paid in Capital. There was no share-basedcompensation for the year ended December 31, 2011. 53 Table of ContentsTransaction costs: On September 10, 2010, we completed the VLCC Acquisition and we incurred certain expenses directly related to such acquisition thatamounted to $8.0 million. From the $8.0 million, $2.4 million was related to various audit, legal and consulting fees and $5.6 million was related to the fairvalue of 3,000 shares of preferred stock issued to an independent third party holder in connection with the payment of certain consultant and advisory fees.There were no transaction costs for the year ended December 31, 2011.Depreciation and Amortization: Depreciation and amortization increased by $28.5 million to $38.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 ascompared to $10.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The increase of $28.5 million was attributable to: (a) an increase in depreciation expense of$23.9 million due to the acquisitions of the vessel Nave Cielo (ex. Colin Jacob) in June, 2010, Nave Ariadne (ex. Ariadne Jacob) in July 2010, seven VLCCsin September 2010, of which the Shinyo Kieran was delivered in June 2011, the vessel Nave Cosmos in October 2010, the Nave Polaris in January 2011, theBuddy and the Bull in July 2011 and the Nave Andromeda in November 2011; and (b) an increase in amortization expense of $4.6 million due to thefavorable and unfavorable lease terms that were recognized in relation to the acquisition of the rights on the time charter-out contracts of the vessels.Depreciation of vessel is calculated using an estimated useful life of 25 years for the date the vessel was originally delivered from the shipyard. Intangibleassets are amortized over the contract periods, which range from 3.17 to 15.00 years.Prepayment penalties and write-off deferred financing costs: Prepayment penalties and write-off of deferred financing costs amounted to approximately$0.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $5.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.For the year ended December 31, 2011, an amount of $0.9 million of deferred financing costs was written-off in relation to the cancellation of certaincommitted credit.For the year ended December 31, 2010, following the issuance of the Existing Notes and net proceeds raised of $388.9 million, loan facilities, that previouslysecured the six VLCC vessels, were fully repaid, and as a result deferred finance costs related to these facilities of $2.9 million, were written off andprepayment fees of $2.5 million were paid.Interest Income: Interest income for year ended December 31, 2011 increased by $0.5 million to $1.4 million compared to $0.9 million for the year endedDecember 31, 2010.Interest expense and finance cost, net: Interest expense and finance cost, net for the year ended December 31, 2011 increased by $32.5 million to$43.2 million, as compared to $10.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The increase was due to: (a) the increase in average outstanding loanbalance to $327.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2011 from $185.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2010; (b) the full effect of the ExistingNotes which were issued on October 21, 2010; and (c) the effect of the Additional Notes, which were issued on May 26, 2011. As of December 31, 2011 and2010, the outstanding loan balance under Navios Acquisition’s credit facilities was $885.4 million and $721.8 million, respectively, and the weightedaverage interest rate as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 was 3.16% and 3.27%, respectively.Other (expense)/ income, net: Other (expense)/ income, net decreased to a $0.4 million expense for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $0.4million income for the same period in 2010. The decrease of $0.8 million was mainly attributable to: (a) $0.5 million of claim reserves; and (b) $0.3 milliondecrease in miscellaneous income.B. Liquidity and Capital Resources and UsesOur primary short-term liquidity needs are to fund general working capital requirements, drydocking expenditures, deposits for vessels under construction,minimum cash balance maintenance as per our credit facility agreements and debt repayment, while our long-term liquidity needs primarily relate toexpansion and investment capital expenditures and other maintenance capital expenditures and debt repayment. Expansion capital expenditures areprimarily for the purchase or construction of vessels to the extent the expenditures increase the operating capacity of or revenue generated by our fleet, whilemaintenance capital expenditures primarily consist of drydocking expenditures and expenditures to replace vessels in order to maintain the operatingcapacity of or revenue generated by our fleet. We anticipate that our primary sources of funds for our short-term liquidity needs will be cash flows fromoperations and bank borrowings which we believe that will be sufficient to meet our existing short-term liquidity needs for at least the next 12 months.Generally, our long-term sources of funds will be from cash from operations, long-term bank borrowings and other debt or equity financings. We expect thatwe will rely upon external financing sources, including bank borrowings, to fund acquisitions and expansion and investment capital expenditures. Wecannot assure you that we will be able to secure adequate financing or obtaining additional funds on favorable terms, to meet our liquidity needs. Please alsorefer to “Item 3.D.-Risks Related to Our Indebtedness”. 54 Table of ContentsSince 2010, Navios Acquisition had the following equity raisings: • On November 19, 2010, Navios Acquisition completed the public offering of 6,500,000 shares of common stock at $5.50 per share andraised gross proceeds of $35.8 million. The net proceeds of this offering, including the underwriting discount of $1.8 million andexcluding offering costs of $0.6 million were approximately $34.0 million. • In February 2013, Navios Acquisition completed two registered direct offerings of a total of 17,544,300 shares at $2.85 per share andraised gross proceeds of $50.0 million in total. The net proceeds of the offerings including the underwriting discount of $2.0 million intotal and excluding estimated offering costs of $0.6 million, were $48.0 million. On February 26, 2013, Navios Acquisition completedthe private placement of 17,702,491 shares of common stock at a price of $2.85 per share, to Navios Holdings and certain members of themanagement of Navios Acquisition, Navios Holdings and Navios Partners, raising gross proceeds of $50.5 million. The net proceeds ofthis private placement, including the agents’ fees of $2.0 million were $48.5 million.Navios Acquisition finances its capital requirements with cash flows from operations, equity contributions from stockholders, bank loans and the issuance ofthe Existing Notes and Additional Notes. The main uses of funds have been capital expenditures for the acquisition of new vessels, expenditures incurred inconnection with ensuring that the owned vessels comply with international and regulatory standards, repayments of bank loans and payments of dividends.Our contracts for the construction of our vessels are cancellable in various cases among which are, the shipbuilders’ inability to meet its obligations fordelivery of the vessel until a set deadline and in accordance with its specifications, our inability to finance the purchase of the vessel, bankruptcy or otherfinancial or liquidity problems of the shipbuilder and our inability to obtain requisite permits or approvals.As of December 31, 2012, the remaining contractual installments for our tanker vessels to be delivered on various dates through October 2014, were $105.1million of which $48.8 million will be financed through committed debt financing, $6.0 million through the issuance of Series D Preferred Stock and $50.3million through cash on hand.Cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to the year ended December 31, 2011:The following table presents cash flow information for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. This information was derived from the auditedconsolidated statement of cash flows of Navios Acquisition for the respective periods. (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars) Year EndedDecember 31,2012 Year EndedDecember 31,2011 Net cash provided by operating activities $81,877 64,233 Net cash used in investing activities (205,956) (225,777)Net cash provided by financing activities 125,625 141,484 Change in cash and cash equivalents $1,546 (20,060) Cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011:Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $17.7 million to $81.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to $64.2 million forthe same period in 2011. The increase is analyzed as follows:The net loss for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $3.8 million compared to $3.9 million loss for the year ended December 31, 2011. In determining netcash provided by operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2012, net loss was adjusted for the effect of depreciation and amortization of$49.6 million, $2.8 million for amortization and write-off of deferred finance cost, net and $2.6 million for the amortization of drydock and special surveycosts. For the period ended December 31, 2011, net income was also adjusted for the effects of certain non-cash items, including depreciation andamortization of $38.6 million, $3.2 million amortization and write-off of deferred financing cost, net and $0.6 million for the amortization of drydock andspecial survey costs.Amounts due to related parties increased by $41.9 million from $43.6 million at December 31, 2011 to $85.5 million at December 31, 2012, as a result of a:(a) $33.6 million increase in management fees, accrued administrative expenses and other payables due to affiliated companies; (b) $6.1 million non-cashincrease in pre-building costs; and (c) $2.2 million increase in expenses incurred by the Manager in relation to drydock and special survey costs of oneVLCC vessel and two LR1 product tanker vessels. Please see disclosures contained under “Item 7.B.Related Party Transactions”. 55 Table of ContentsPayment for drydock and special survey cost incurred in the year ended December 31, 2012 was $2.9 million and related to the drydock and special surveycosts incurred for one VLCC and two LR1 tanker vessels of the fleet. Payment for drydock and special survey cost incurred in the year ended December 31,2011 was $7.8 million and related to the drydock and special survey costs incurred for two VLCC tanker vessels.Accounts receivable decreased by $1.4 million from $6.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, to $5.1 million for the year ended December 31,2012 and were related to receivables from charterers.Restricted cash from operating activities decreased by $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 and related to the cash held in retention accountsfor the payment of interest under our credit facilities.Accounts payable increased by $0.3 million from $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 to $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.This increase was attributable to the increase in broker’s payable by $0.2 million and the increase in other creditors by $0.2 million partially offset by adecrease of $0.1 million in legal and professional fees.Prepaid expenses and other current assets increased by $2.2 million to $2.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $0.5 million for the yearended December 31, 2011. The increase was mainly due to the amounts advanced to certain counterparties for working capital purposes as per the chartersentered with them.Other long term assets decreased by $0.4 million to $0.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $1.3 million for the year ended December 31,2011. On October 28, 2011, the charter contract of the Nave Ariadne (ex. Ariadne Jacob) and the Nave Cielo (ex. Colin Jacob) were terminated prior to theiroriginal expiration date in June 2013. Navios Acquisition entered into certain settlement agreements with charterers that provided for an amount ofapproximately $5.0 million to compensate for the early termination of the charters and to cover outstanding receivables, out of which $1.5 million will besettled in installments until June 2015, the long term portion being $0.9 million.Accrued expenses decreased by $2.5 million to $13.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, from $15.5 million on December 31, 2011. The decreasewas attributable to a $4.2 million decrease in accrued other expenses partially offset by a $1.5 increase in accrued voyage expenses and a $0.2 increase inaccrued interest.Deferred voyage revenue primarily relates to cash received from charterers prior to it being earned. These amounts are recognized as revenue over the voyageor charter period. Deferred voyage revenue increased by $0.4 million to $3.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $3.3 million onDecember 31, 2011.Long Term Liabilities decreased by $0.3 million to $0.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 from $0.5 million on December 31, 2011. Long termliabilities are related to the long term portion of the straight line effect of revenue of the vessels acquired in July 2011.Cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011:Net cash used in investing activities decreased by $19.9 million to $205.9 million at December 31, 2012 from $225.8 million at December 31, 2011.Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2012, resulted from: (a) $11.0 million paid for the acquisition of the Nave Estella inJanuary 2012, $9.0 million paid for acquisition of the Nave Atria in July 2012, $ 27.3 million paid for the acquisition of the Nave Cassiopeia in August 2012,$27.5 million paid for the acquisition of the Nave Cetus in October 2012 and $12.7 million paid for the acquisition of the Nave Aquila in November 2012;and (b) $142.1 million paid as a deposits for the acquisition of the vessels that will be delivered to Navios Acquisition at various dates through October 2014.The $229.6 million was partially offset by a $19.4 million decrease in restricted cash and $4.3 million of non-cash items.Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2011, resulted from: (a) $4.5 million paid for the acquisition of the Nave Polaris inJanuary 2011, $29.3 million paid for the acquisition of the Shinyo Kieran in June 2011, $37.3 million paid for the acquisition of the Buddy and $37.3million paid for the acquisition of the Bull in July 2011 and $ 27.0 million paid for the acquisition of the Nave Andromeda in November 2011;(b) $78.5 million paid as a deposits for the acquisition of the vessels that will be delivered to Navios Acquisition at various dates through October 2014;(c) $7.8 million paid for improvements in certain VLCC vessels; and (d) $10.4 million of intangible assets and liabilities associated with the acquisition oftwo MR2 vessels in July 2011. The $232.1 million was partially offset by a $3.8 million decrease in restricted cash and $2.5 million of non-cash items. 56 Table of ContentsCash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011:Net cash provided by financing activities decreased by $15.9 million to $125.6 million at December 31, 2012 from $141.5 million at December 31, 2011.Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $125.6 million. Net cash provided by financing activities resulted from a$162.8 million loan proceeds net of deferred finance fees and $5.0 million proceeds from related party loan, net of deferred finance fees. This increase waspartially offset by: (a) a $8.7 million increase in restricted cash; (b) $13.7 million for loan repayments; (c) a $10.0 million repayment of a loan from relatedparty; and (d) dividends paid of $9.8 million.Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $141.5 million. Net cash provided by financing activities resulted from$252.1 million loan proceeds net of deferred finance fees and $33.2 million proceeds from related party loan, net of deferred finance fees. This increase waspartially offset by: (a) a $1.7 million increase in restricted cash; (b) $126.3 million for loan repayments; (c) a $6.0 million repayment of a loan from a relatedparty; and (d) dividends paid of $9.8 million.Cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to the year ended December 31, 2010:The following table presents cash flow information for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010. This information was derived from the auditedconsolidated statement of cash flows of Navios Acquisition for the respective periods. (Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars) Year EndedDecember 31,2011 Year EndedDecember 31,2010 Net cash provided by operating activities $64,233 $10,300 Net cash used in investing activities (225,777) (103,602) Net cash provided by financing activities 141,484) 154,575 Change in cash and cash equivalents. $(20,060) $61,273 Cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2011 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2010:Net cash provided by operating activities increased by $53.9 million to $64.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 as compared to $10.3 million forthe same period in 2010. The increase is analyzed as follows:The net loss for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $3.9 million compared to $13.5 million loss for the year ended December 31, 2010. In determiningnet cash provided by operating activities for the years ended December 31, 2011, net loss was adjusted for the effect of depreciation and amortization of$38.6 million, $3.2 million for amortization and write-off of deferred finance cost net and $0.6 million for the amortization of drydock and special surveycosts. For the period ended December 31, 2010, net income was also adjusted for the effects of certain non-cash items, including depreciation andamortization of $10.1 million, $3.5 million amortization and write-off of deferred financing cost net, $5.6 million for non-cash transaction costs and$2.1 million for share based compensation.Amounts due to related parties increased by $37.5 million from $6.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 to $43.6 million for the year endedDecember 31, 2011. The increase was due to: (a) administrative fees payable to the Manager of $0.9 million; (b) managements fees payable to the Manager of$18.1 million; (c) $14.7 million costs related to vessel pre-building expenses, dry dockings and insurances; (d) $0.1 million related to accrued interest; and(e)$3.7 million non-cash increase in pre-building costs.Payments for dry dock and special survey costs incurred in the year ended December 31, 2011 were $7.8 million and related to the dry dock and specialsurvey costs incurred for two of the VLCC tanker vessels of the fleet.Accounts receivable increased by $2.0 million to $6.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, from $4.5 million for the year ended December 31,2010 and were related to receivables from charterers.Restricted cash from operating activities decrease by $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 and related to the cash held in retention account forthe payment of interest under our credit facilities.Accounts payable decreased by $2.4 million from $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 to $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.This decrease was attributable to the decrease in legal and professional fees of $2.3 million and the $0.6 million decrease in other creditors which werepartially offset by the $0.5 million increase in broker’s commission payable. 57 Table of ContentsPrepaid expenses increased by $0.1 million to $0.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010,due to a decrease in prepaid vessel operating expenses On November 4, 2011, with respect to the shares held in escrow for the VLCC Acquisition, a total of1,160,963 shares of common stock were released to the sellers and the remaining 217,159 were returned to Navios Acquisition in settlement of claims forbreaches of representations and warranties attributable to the sellers. The returned shares were cancelled on December 30, 2011. The value of the 217,159shares that were returned was $1.2 million.Accrued expenses increased by $6.3 million to $15.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, from $9.2 million on December 31, 2010. The increasewas attributable to a $1.2 million increase in accrued interest, $4.2 million increase in other accrued expenses due to increase in accrued deferred finance feesincurred in relation to credit facilities entered to partially finance the acquisition of three MR2 vessels, $0.4 million increase in voyage expenses and $0.5million increase due to the straight line effect of revenue of the vessels acquired in July 2011.Other long term assets increased by $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 and $0 million of the comparative period in 2010. On October 28,2011, the charter contract of the Nave Ariadne (ex. Ariadne Jacob) and Nave Cielo (ex. Colin Jacob) were terminated prior to their original expiration in June2013. Navios Acquisition entered into certain settlement agreements with charterers that provide for an amount of approximately $5.0 million to compensatefor the early termination of the charters and to cover outstanding receivables, out of which $2.0 million will be settled in installments until June 2015.Deferred voyage revenue primarily relates to cash received from charterers prior to it being earned. These amounts are recognized as revenue over the voyageor charter period. Deferred voyage revenue increased by $0.5 million to $3.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 from $2.8 million onDecember 31, 2010.Long Term Liabilities increased by $0.5 million. Long term liabilities are related to the long term portion of the straight line effect of revenue of the vesselsacquired in July 2011.Cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2011 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2010:Net cash used in investing activities increased by $122.2 million to $225.8 million at December 31, 2011 from $103.6 million at December 31, 2010 mainlyas a result of fleet expansion.Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2011, resulted from: (a) $4.5 million paid for the acquisition of the Nave Polaris inJanuary 2011, $29.3 million paid for the acquisition of the Shinyo Kieran in June 2011, $37.3 million paid for the acquisition of the Buddy and $37.3million paid for the acquisition of the Bull in July 2011 and $ 27.0 million paid for the acquisition of the Nave Andromeda in November 2011;(b) $78.5 million paid as a deposits for the acquisition of the vessels that will be delivered to Navios Acquisition at various dates through October 2014;(c) $7.8 million paid for improvements in certain VLCC vessels; and (d) $10.4 million of intangible assets and liabilities associated with the acquisition oftwo MR2 vessels in July 2011. The $232.1 million was partially offset by a $3.8 million decrease in restricted cash and $2.5 million of non-cash itemsFor the year ended December 31, 2010, net cash used in investing activities increased as a result of: (a) a $76.4 million refund to Navios Holdings, whichmade the first equity installment payment on the vessels acquired in Navios Acquisition’s initial vessel acquisition; (b) $39.3 million paid for the acquisitionof the Nave Cielo (ex. Colin Jacob) in June 2010, $39.3 million paid for the acquisition of the Nave Ariadne (ex. Ariadne Jacob) and $11.3 million paid forthe acquisition of the Nave Cosmos in October 2010; (c) $102.0 million paid for the VLCC Acquisition, net of cash acquired through working capital; and(d) $89.8 million paid as a deposits for the acquisition of the vessels that will be delivered to Navios Acquisition at various dates through December 2012.The increase was partially offset by the release of $251.5 million of investments from the trust account and the release of $2.3 million from the restricted cashand $0.8 million of non-cash items.Cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2011 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2010:Net cash provided by financing activities decreased by $13.1 million to $141.5 million at December 31, 2011 from $154.6 million at December 31, 2010.Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2011 was $141.5 million. Net cash provided by financing activities resulted from$252.1 million of loan proceeds net of deferred finance fees and $33.2 million proceeds from related party loan, net of deferred finance fees. This increase waspartially offset by: (a) a $1.7 million decrease in restricted cash; (b) $126.3 million for loan repayments; (c) a $6.0 million repayment of a loan from a relatedparty; and (d) dividends paid of $9.8 million. 58 Table of ContentsNet cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2010 was $154.6 million. Net cash provided by financing activities resulted from:(a) $556.7 million loan proceeds net of deferred finance fees; (b) $75.0 million from net proceeds from the warrant exercise program; (c) $39.6 million ofproceeds from a related party loan; and (d) $33.4 million of net proceeds from the equity offering of 6,500,000 shares that was completed on November 19,2010. This increase was offset by: (a) $99.3 million paid to holders of 10,021,399 shares of our common stock who voted against the initial vessel acquisitionand elected to redeem their shares; (b) $8.9 million disbursed to the underwriters of Navios Acquisition’s initial public offering for deferred fees;(c) $0.3 million decrease in restricted cash; (d) $412.3 million for loan repayments, of which, $410.5 million was associated with facilities acquired in theVLCC Acquisition; (e) $27.6 million repayment of a loan from related party; and (f) $1.8 million costs related to the issuance of Series B convertiblepreferred stock.Reconciliation of EBITDA to Net Cash from Operating Activities Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars Year EndedDecember 31,2012(unaudited) Year EndedDecember 31,2011(unaudited) Year EndedDecember 31,2010(unaudited) Net Cash from Operating Activities $81,877 $64,233 $10,300 Net increase in operating assets 3,030 12,972 1,579 Net increase in operating liabilities (33,619) (38,603) (4,090) Net interest cost 48,987 41,751 9,789 Amortization of deferred finance cost (2,820) (2,253) (518) Write-off of deferred finance costs — (935) (2,938) Share-based compensation — — (2,140) Non-cash transaction costs — — (5,619) EBITDA $97,455 $77,165 $6,363 (1) Year endedDecember 31,2012 Year endedDecember 31,2011 Year endedDecember 31,2010 Net cash provided by operating activities $81,877 $64,233 $10,300 Net cash used in investing activities $(205,956) $(225,777) $(103,602) Net cash provided by financing activities $125,625 $141,484 $154,575 EBITDA represents loss plus interest expenses and finance cost plus depreciation and amortization and income taxes.EBITDA is presented because Navios Acquisition believes that EBITDA is basis upon which liquidity can be assessed and present useful information toinvestors regarding Navios Acquisition’s ability to service and/or incur indebtedness, pay capital expenditures, meet working capital requirements and paydividends. EBITDA is “non-GAAP financial measure” and should not be considered a substitute for net income, cash flow from operating activities and otheroperations or cash flow statement data prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States or as a measure ofprofitability or liquidity.While EBITDA is frequently used as a measure of operating results and the ability to meet debt service requirements, the definition of EBITDA used here maynot be comparable to that used by other companies due to differences in methods of calculation.EBITDA for the year ended December 31, 2012, increased by $20.3 million to $97.5 million, as compared to $77.2 million for the same period in 2011. Theincrease in EBITDA was due to a: (a) $29.2 million increase in revenue due to the acquisitions of the Shinyo Kieran in June 2011, the Bull and the Buddy inJuly 2011, the Nave Andromeda in November 2011, the Nave Estella in January 2012, the Nave Atria in July 2012, the Nave Cassiopeia in August 2012, theNave Cetus in October 2012 and the Nave Aquila in November 2012; (b) $0.9 million write-off of deferred financing costs incurred in 2011; (c) $0.3 milliondecrease in general and administrative expenses; (d) $0.5 million increase in other income/ (expense), net; and (e) $0.7 million decrease in time charterexpenses. The above $31.6 million increase was partially offset by an $11.3 million increase in management fees. 59(1) Table of ContentsEBITDA increased by $70.8 million to $77.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, as compared to $6.4 million for the same period of 2010. Theincrease in EBITDA was due to: (a) a $88.3 million increase in revenue following the acquisitions of the Nave Cielo and the Nave Ariadne in July 2010, theVLCC Acquisition in September 2010, of which the Shinyo Kieran was delivered in June 2011, the Nave Cosmos in October 2010, the Nave Polaris inJanuary 2011, the Buddy and the Bull in July 2011 and the Nave Andromeda in November 2011; (b) $8.0 million of transaction costs for the VLCCAcquisition incurred in 2010; (c) a $2.1 million of share based compensation incurred in 2010; and (d) a $5.4 million of prepayment fees and write-off ofdeferred financing costs incurred in 2010. The above increase of $103.8 million was partially offset by a: (a) $25.9 million increase in management fees dueto the increased number of vessels in Navios Acquisition’s fleet; (b) $3.1 million increase in time charter expenses; (c) $2.3 million increase in general andadministrative expenses; (d) $0.8 million increase in other net income; and (e) a $0.9 million write-off of deferred financing costs incurred in 2011.Long-Term Obligations and Credit Arrangements8 5/8% First Priority Ship Mortgage NotesOn October 21, 2010, Navios Acquisition and Navios Acquisition Finance completed the sale of the $400.0 million of Existing Notes. On May 26, 2011,Navios Acquisition and Navios Acquisition Finance completed the sale of the $105.0 million of Additional Notes. The Existing Notes and the AdditionalNotes are secured by first priority ship mortgages on seven VLCC vessels owned by certain subsidiary guarantors.The Existing Notes and the Additional Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several basis by all of the Company’s subsidiaries withthe exception of Navios Acquisition Finance. The subsidiary guarantees are full and unconditional, as that term is defined by Regulation S-X Rule 3-10,except for the fact that the indenture provides for an individual subsidiary’s guarantee to be automatically released in certain customary circumstances, suchas when a subsidiary is sold or all assets are sold, the capital stock is sold, when the subsidiary is designated as an “unrestricted subsidiary” for purposes ofthe bond indenture upon liquidation or dissolution or upon legal or covenant defeasance or satisfaction and discharge of the Existing Notes and theAdditional Notes.Navios Acquisition does not have any subsidiaries that are not guarantors of the 8 5/8% Notes. In addition, the disclosures required by Rules 3-10(i)(9) and(10) are not applicable because there are no significant restrictions on (i) the ability of the parent company, any issuer (or co-issuer) or any guarantorsubsidiaries of the 8 5/8% Notes to obtain funds by dividend or loan from any of their subsidiaries or (ii) the ability of any subsidiaries to transfer funds to theissuer (or co-issuer) or any guarantor subsidiaries.The Existing Notes and the Additional Notes contain covenants which, among other things, limit the incurrence of additional indebtedness, issuance ofcertain preferred stock, the payment of dividends, redemption or repurchase of capital stock or making restricted payments and investments, creation ofcertain liens, transfer or sale of assets, entering into certain transactions with affiliates, merging or consolidating or selling all or substantially all ofCompany’s properties and assets and creation or designation of restricted subsidiaries.Credit FacilitiesCommerzbank AG, Alpha Bank A.E., and Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank: As a result of its initial vessel acquisition, Navios Acquisitionassumed a loan agreement dated April 7, 2010, with Commerzbank AG, Alpha Bank A.E. and Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank of up to$150.0 million (divided in six equal tranches of $25.0 million each) to partially finance the construction of two chemical tankers and four product tankers.Each tranche of the facility is repayable in 12 equal semi-annual installments of $0.75 million each with a final balloon payment of $16.75 million to berepaid on the last repayment date. The repayment of each tranche starts six months after the delivery date of the respective vessel which that tranche finances.It bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 250 bps. The loan also requires compliance with certain financial covenants. As of December 31, 2012, $137.4million was outstanding under this facility and $7.4 million remains to be drawn.BNP Paribas SA Bank and DVB Bank S.E.: As a result of the initial vessel acquisition, Navios Acquisition assumed a loan agreement dated April 8, 2010, ofup to $75.0 million (divided in three equal tranches of $25.0 million each) for the purpose of part-financing the purchase price of three product tankers. Eachof the tranche is repayable in 12 equal semi-annual installments of $0.75 million each with a final balloon payment of $16.75 million to be repaid on the lastrepayment date. The repayment date of each tranche starts six months after the delivery date of the respective vessel which that tranche finances. It bearsinterest at a rate of LIBOR plus 250 bps. The loan also requires compliance with certain financial covenants. As of December 31, 2012, $58.4 million wasoutstanding under this facility and $16.6 million remains to be drawn. 60 Table of ContentsDVB Bank S.E. and ABN AMRO Bank N.V.: On May 28, 2010, Navios Acquisition entered into a loan agreement with DVB Bank S.E. and ABN AMROBANK N.V. of up to $52.0 million (divided into two tranches of $26.0 million each) to partially finance the acquisition costs of two product tanker vessels.Each tranche of the facility is repayable in 24 equal quarterly installments of $0.45 million each with a final balloon payment of $15.2 million to be repaidon the last repayment date. The repayment of each tranche starts three months after the delivery date of the respective vessel. It bears interest at a rate ofLIBOR plus 275 bps. The loan also requires compliance with certain financial covenants. On December 29, 2011, Navios Acquisition prepaid $2.5 million inrelation to an amendment to its credit facility. After the prepayment, outstanding amount under each tranche is repayable in five quarterly installments of$0.2 each, 13 equal quarterly installments of $0.44 million each, with a final balloon payment of $15.2 million to be repaid on the last repayment date. OnDecember 31, 2012, Navios Acquisition prepaid $0.5 million in relation to an amendment to its credit facility. After the prepayment, outstanding amountunder each tranche is repayable in two quarterly installments of $0.2 million each, 13 equal quarterly installments of $0.4 million each, with a final balloonpayment of $15.2 million to be repaid on the last repayment date. As of December 31, 2012, the facility was fully drawn and the outstanding amount was$42.0 million.Cyprus Popular Bank Public Co Ltd: In September 2010, Navios Acquisition (through four subsidiaries) entered into a $80.0 million revolving credit facilitywith Cyprus Popular Bank Public Co Ltd to partially finance the acquisition and construction of vessels and for investment and working capital purposes. OnSeptember 7, 2012, the amount of the facility was reduced to $32.4 million. Drawings under the facility are secured by assignments of construction contractsand guarantees, as well as security interests in related assets. The facility bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 275 bps. Pursuant to an agreement datedDecember 31, 2012, the maturity of the facility was extended to match the delivery of the vessels. As of December 31, 2012, the outstanding amount underthis facility was $32.4 million that was used to partially finance the acquisition cost of two product tanker vessels.EFG Eurobank Ergasias S.A.: On October 26, 2010, Navios Acquisition entered into a loan agreement with Eurobank Ergasias S.A. of up to $52.2 million outof which $51.6 million has been drawn (divided into two tranches of $26.1 million and $25.5 million) to partially finance the acquisition costs of two LR1product tanker vessels. Each tranche of the facility is repayable in 32 equal quarterly installments of $0.35 million, each with a final balloon payment of$15.1 million and $14.7 million, to be repaid on the last repayment date. The repayment of each tranche started three months after the delivery date of therespective vessel. The loan bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus (i) plus 250 bps for the period prior to the delivery date in respect of the vessel beingfinanced, and (ii) thereafter 275 bps. The loan also requires compliance with certain financial covenants. The facility was fully drawn and the outstandingamount as of December 31, 2012 was $49.2 million.EFG Eurobank Ergasias S.A.: On December 6, 2010, Navios Acquisition entered into a loan agreement with Eurobank Ergasias S.A. of up to $52.0 millionout of which $46.2 million has been drawn (divided into two tranches of $23.1 million each) to partially finance the acquisition costs of two LR1 producttanker vessels. Each tranche of the facility is repayable in 32 equal quarterly installments of $0.3 million each with a final balloon payment of $13.3 million,to be repaid on the last repayment date. The repayment of each tranche started three months after the delivery date of the respective vessel. It bears interest ata rate of LIBOR plus 300 bps. The loan also requires compliance with certain financial covenants. The facility was fully drawn and the outstanding amount asof December 31, 2012 was $45.9 million.ABN AMRO BANK N.V.: On July 8, 2011, Navios Acquisition entered into a loan agreement with ABN AMRO Bank N.V of up to $55.1 million (divided intotwo equal tranches) to partially finance the purchase price of two MR2 product tanker vessels. The total amount of $54.8 million was drawn under thisfacility. Each tranche of the facility is repayable in 12 quarterly installments of $0.75 million each and 12 quarterly installments of $0.57 million each with afinal balloon payment of $11.6 million to be repaid on the last repayment date. The repayment of each tranche started in October 2011 and it bears interest ata rate of LIBOR plus 325 bps. The loan also requires compliance with certain financial covenants. As of December 31, 2012, $47.3 million was outstandingunder this loan agreement ($23.65 million from each of the two tranches), and no further amounts are available to be drawn.DVB Bank SE: On December 7, 2011, Navios Acquisition entered into a loan agreement with DVB Bank SE of up to $51.0 million (divided into two tranchesof $25.5 million each) to partially finance the purchase price of two LR1 product tanker vessels. Each tranche of the facility is repayable in 28 quarterlyinstallments of $0.4 million each with a final balloon payment of $14.3 million to be repaid on the last repayment date. The repayment starts three monthsafter the delivery of the respective vessel and it bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 270 bps per annum. The loan also requires compliance with certainfinancial covenants. As of December 31, 2012, there were no outstanding amounts under this loan agreement and $51.0 million remained to be drawn.NORDDEUTSCHE LANDESBANK GIROZENTRALE: On December 29, 2011, Navios Acquisition entered into a loan agreement with NORDDEUTSCHELANDESBANK GIROZENTRALE of up to $28.1 million to partially finance the purchase price of one MR2 product tanker vessel. The facility is repayablein 32 quarterly installments of $0.39 million each with a final balloon payment of $15.6 million to be repaid on the last repayment date. The repayment startsthree months 61 Table of Contentsafter the delivery of the vessel and it bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus: (a) up to but not including the Drawdown Date of, 175bps per annum;(b) thereafter until, but not including, the tenth Repayment Date, 250 bps per annum; and (c) thereafter 300 bps per annum. The loan also requires compliancewith certain financial covenants. As of December 31, 2012, $25.0 million was outstanding under this loan agreement and $3.1 million remained to be drawn.DVB Bank SE and Credit Agricole.: On December 29, 2011, Navios Acquisition entered into a loan agreement with DVB Bank SE and Credit Agricole of upto $56.3 million (divided into two tranches of $28.1 million each) to partially finance the purchase price of two MR2 product tanker vessels. Each tranche ofthe facility is repayable in 32 quarterly installments of $0.39 million each with a final balloon payment of $15.6 million to be repaid on the last repaymentdate. The repayment starts three months after the delivery of the respective vessel and it bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus: (a) up to but not including theDrawdown Date of, 175 bps per annum; (b) thereafter until, but not including, the tenth Repayment Date, 250 bps per annum; and (c) thereafter 300 bps perannum. The loan also requires compliance with certain financial covenants. As of December 31, 2012, $49.9 million was outstanding under this loanagreement and $6.3 million remained to be drawn.Navios Holdings Credit Facility: Navios Acquisition entered into a $40.0 million credit facility with Navios Holdings and paid $0.4 million as arrangementfee. The $40.0 million facility has a margin of LIBOR plus 300 bps. Pursuant to an amendment in October 2010, the facility will be available for multipledrawings up to a limit of $40.0 million. Pursuant to an agreement dated November 8, 2011, this facility was extended from April 2012 to December 2014. Asof December 31, 2012, the outstanding amount under this facility was $35.0 million and $5.0 million remained to be drawn.As of December 31, 2012, the total amount available to be drawn from all of our facilities was $89.4 million of which $84.4 million will be used to financethe acquisition and construction of vessels and $5.0 million for investment and working capital purposes.C. Research and development, patents and licenses, etc.Not applicable.D. Trend informationOur results of operations depend primarily on the charter hire rates that we are able to realize for our vessels, which depend on the demand and supplydynamics characterizing the tanker market at any given time. For other trends affecting our business please see other discussions in “Item 5-Operating andFinancial Review and Prospects”.E. Off-Balance Sheet ArrangementsWe have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have, a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changesin financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.F. Contractual Obligations and ContingenciesThe following table summarizes our long-term contractual obligations as of December 31, 2012: Payments due by period (In thousands of U.S. dollars) Less than1 year 1-3 years 3-5 years More than5 years Total Long term debt obligations $19,724 $41,003 $634,752 $297,014 $992,493 Loans due to related parties — 35,000 — — 35,000 Due to related parties, long-term 57,701 57,701 Vessel deposits 69,170 35,880 — — 105,050 Total contractual obligations $88,894 $169,584 $634,752 $297,014 $1,190,244 62(1,2)(3)(4) Table of Contents1.The amount identified does not include interest costs associated with the outstanding credit facility which is based on LIBOR, plus the costs ofcomplying with any applicable regulatory requirements and a margin ranging from 1.75% to 3.25% per annum.2.The long-term debt contractual obligations includes in the amount shown for more than three and five years future principal payments of the drawnportion of credit facilities associated with the financing of the construction of the LR1 vessel, the Nave Bellatrix, which was delivered to NaviosAcquisition’s fleet on January 24, 2013 and of the MR2 vessel, the Nave Rigel, which was delivered to Navios Acquisition’s fleet on February 14,2013.3.The amount relates to the credit facility with Navios Holdings. The amount identified does not include interest costs associated with the outstandingcredit facility which is based on LIBOR, and a margin of 3.00% per annum.4.Future remaining contractual deposits of the eight MR2 product tanker vessels and the two LR1 product tanker vessels to be delivered on various datesthrough October 2014.Critical Accounting PoliciesOur consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to makeestimates in the application of our accounting policies based on the best assumptions, judgments and opinions of management. Following is a discussion ofthe accounting policies that involve a higher degree of judgment and the methods of their application that affect the reported amount of assets and liabilities,revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements. Actual results may differ from theseestimates under different assumptions or conditions.Critical accounting policies are those that reflect significant judgments or uncertainties, and potentially result in materially different results under differentassumptions and conditions. For a description of all of our significant accounting policies, see Note 2 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements,included herein.Fair Value of Vessels: As of December 31, 2012, Navios Acquisition owned and operated a fleet of 19 vessels, with an aggregate carrying value of $995.4million, including the carrying value of existing time charters on its fleet of vessels. On a vessel-by-vessel basis, as of December 31, 2012, the carrying valueof 18 of Navios Acquisition’s vessels (including the carrying value of the time charter, if any, on the specified vessel) exceeds the estimated fair value ofthose same vessels (including the estimated fair value of the time charter, if any, on the specified vessel) by approximately $142.8 million in aggregate (theunrealized loss).A vessel-by-vessel summary as of December 31, 2012, follows (with an * indicating those individual vessels whose carrying value exceeds its estimated fairvalue, including the related time charter, if any): Vessel name Date ofAcquisition PurchasePrice (1) CarryingValue as ofDecember 31,2012 (1) (In millions of U.S. dollars) Nave Cielo 6-29-2010 $44.2 $$39.6* Nave Ariadne 7-2-2010 $44.1 $39.5* Nave Cosmos 7-27-2010 $31.8 $29.2* Shinyo Navigator 9-10-2010 $60.5 $48.2* Shinyo Kannika 9-10-2010 $81.3 $70.4* Shinyo Kieran 6-8-2011 $139.7 $131.0* Shinyo Ocean 9-10-2010 $81.7 $70.2* Shinyo Splendor 9-10-2010 $45.0 $35.0* C. Dream 9-10-2010 $62.2 $55.0* Shinyo Saowalak 9-10-2010 $137.6 $124.6* Nave Polaris 1-27-2011 $31.7 $29.5* Buddy 7-12-2011 $42.5 $38.0* Bull 7-18-2011 $42.4 $37.9* Nave Andromeda 11-14-2011 $44.3 $42.5* Nave Estella 1-20-2012 $44.6 $43.1* Nave Atria 7-31-2012 $37.6 $37.0* Nave Cassiopeia 8-31-2012 $43.8 $43.3* Nave Cetus 10-31-2012 $44.0 $43.7* Nave Aquila 11-9-2012 $37.8 $37.7* 1,096.8 995.4 (1)All amounts include related time charter, if any. Although the aforementioned excess of carrying value over fair value represents an estimate of the loss that Navios Acquisition would sustain on ahypothetical disposition of those vessels as of December 31, 2012, the recognition of the unrealized loss absent a disposition (i.e. as an impairment)would require, among other things, that a triggering event had occurred and that the undiscounted cash flows attributable to the vessel are also lessthan the carrying value of the vessel (including the carrying value of the time charter, if any, on the specified vessel). 63 Table of ContentsUse of Estimates: The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates andassumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the dates of the financialstatements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. On an on-going basis, management evaluates the estimates andjudgments, including those related to uncompleted voyages, future drydock dates, the selection of useful lives for tangible assets, expected future cash flowsfrom long-lived assets to support impairment tests, provisions necessary for accounts receivables, provisions for legal disputes, and contingencies.Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under thecircumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent fromother sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates under different assumptions and/or conditions.Vessels, Net: Vessels are stated at historical cost, which consists of the contract price, delivery and acquisition expenses and capitalized interest costs whileunder construction. Vessels acquired in an asset acquisition or in a business combination are recorded at fair value. Subsequent expenditures for majorimprovements and upgrading are capitalized, provided they appreciably extend the life, increase the earning capacity or improve the efficiency or safety ofthe vessels. Expenditures for routine maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.Depreciation is computed using the straight line method over the useful life of the vessels, after considering the estimated residual value. Managementestimates the residual values of our tanker vessels based on a scrap value of $285 per lightweight ton, as we believe these levels are common in the shippingindustry. Management estimates the useful life of our vessels to be 25 years from the vessel’s original construction. However, when regulations placelimitations over the ability of a vessel to trade on a worldwide basis, its useful life is re-estimated to end at the date such regulations become effective.Impairment of long-lived Asset Group: Vessels, other fixed assets and other long lived assets held and used by Navios Acquisition are reviewed periodicallyfor potential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a particular asset may not be fully recoverable.Navios Acquisition’s management evaluates the carrying amounts and periods over which long-lived assets are depreciated to determine if events or changesin circumstances have occurred that would require modification to their carrying values or useful lives. In evaluating useful lives and carrying values of long-lived assets, certain indicators of potential impairment, are reviewed such as undiscounted projected operating cash flows, vessel sales and purchases,business plans and overall market conditions.Undiscounted projected net operating cash flows are determined for each asset group (consisting of the individual vessel and the intangible with respect tothe time charter agreement to that vessel) and compared to the vessel carrying value and related carrying value of the intangible with respect to the timecharter agreement attached to that vessel or the carrying value of deposits for new buildings. Within the shipping industry, vessels are customarily boughtand sold with a charter attached. The value of the charter may be favorable or unfavorable when comparing the charter rate to then current market rates. Theloss recognized either on impairment (or on disposition) will reflect the excess of carrying value over fair value (selling price) for the vessel individual assetgroup.During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, management concluded that events occurred and circumstances had changed, which indicated the potentialimpairment of Navios Acquisition’s long-lived assets may exist. These indicators included continued deterioration in the spot market, and the related, impactof the current tanker sector has on management’s expectation for future revenues. As a result, an impairment assessment of long-lived assets was performed.The Company determined undiscounted projected net operating cash flows for each vessel and deposits for buildings and compared it to the vessel’s carryingvalue together with the carrying value of the related intangible. The significant factors 64 Table of Contentsand assumptions used in the undiscounted projected net operating cash flow analysis included: determining the projected net operating cash flows byconsidering the charter revenues from existing time charters for the fixed fleet days (Company’s remaining charter agreement rates) and an estimated dailytime charter equivalent for the unfixed days (based on a combination of the Company’s remaining charter agreement rates and the 10-year average historicalone year time charter rates) over the remaining economic life of each vessel, net of brokerage and address commissions, excluding days of scheduled off-hires,management fees fixed until May 2014 and thereafter assuming an annual increase of 3.0% and utilization rate of 98.6% based on the fleets historicalperformance.In connection with its annual impairment testing on its vessels as of December 31, 2012, the Company performs sensitivity analysis on the most sensitiveand/or subjective assumptions that have the potential to affect the outcome of the test, principally the projected charter rate used to forecast future cash flowfor unfixed days. In that regard, there would continue to be no impairment required to be recognized on any of the Company’s vessels when assuming adecline in the 10-year average (of the one-year charter rate for similar vessels), which is the rate that the Company uses to forecast future cash flow for unfixeddays, ranging from 31.6% to 89.6% (depending on the vessel).For the deposits for new build vessels, the net cash flows also included the future cash out flows to make vessel ready for use, all remaining progress paymentsto shipyards and other pre-delivery expenses (e.g. capitalized interest). Accordingly, no impairment charge was recorded.The assessment concluded that step two of the impairment analysis was not required and no impairment of vessels and the intangible assets existed as ofDecember 31, 2012, as the undiscounted projected net operating cash flows exceeded the carrying value.In the event that impairment would occur, the fair value of the related asset would be determined and a charge would be recorded to operations calculated bycomparing the asset’s carrying value to its fair value. Fair value is estimated primarily through the use of third-party valuations performed on an individualvessel basis.Although management believes the underlying assumptions supporting this assessment are reasonable, if charter rate trends and the length of the currentmarket downturn, vary significantly from our forecasts, management may be required to perform step two of the impairment analysis in the future that couldexpose Navios Acquisition to material impairment charges in the future.No impairment loss was recognized for any of the periods presented.Revenue Recognition: Revenue is recorded when services are rendered, under a signed charter agreement or other evidence of an arrangement, the price isfixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. Revenue is generated from the voyage charter and the time charter of vessels.Voyage revenues for the transportation of cargo are recognized ratably over the estimated relative transit time of each voyage. A voyage is deemed tocommence when a vessel is available for loading and is deemed to end upon the completion of the discharge of the current cargo. Estimated losses onvoyages are provided for in full at the time such losses on voyages are provided for in full at the time such losses become evident. Under a voyage charter, avessel is provided for the transportation of specific goods between specific ports in return for payment of an agreed upon freight per ton of cargo.Revenues from time chartering of vessels are accounted for as operating leases and are thus recognized on a straight-line basis as the average revenue over therental periods of such charter agreements, as service is performed. A time charter involves placing a vessel at the charterers’ disposal for a period of timeduring which the charterer uses the vessel in return for the payment of a specified daily hire rate. Under time charters, operating costs such as for crews,maintenance and insurance are typically paid by the owner of the vessel.Profit-sharing revenues are calculated at an agreed percentage of the excess of the charterer’s average daily income (calculated on a quarterly or half-yearlybasis) over an agreed amount and accounted for on an accrual basis based on provisional amounts and for those contracts that provisional accruals cannot bemade due to the nature of the profit share elements, these are accounted for on the actual cash settlement.Revenues are recorded net of address commissions. Address commissions represent a discount provided directly to the charterers based on a fixed percentageof the agreed upon charter or freight rate. Since address commissions represent a discount (sales incentive) on services rendered by the Company and noidentifiable benefit is received in exchange for the consideration provided to the charterer, these commissions are presented as a reduction of revenue. 65 Table of ContentsRecent Accounting PronouncementsFair Value DisclosuresIn January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued amended standards requiring additional fair value disclosures. The amendedstandards require disclosures of transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy, as well as requiring gross basis disclosures for purchases,sales, issuances and settlements within the Level 3 reconciliation. Additionally, the update clarifies the requirement to determine the level of disaggregationfor fair value measurement disclosures and to disclose valuation techniques and inputs used for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements ineither Level 2 or Level 3. Navios Acquisition adopted the new guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, except for the disclosures related to purchases,sales, issuance and settlements, which was effective for Navios Acquisition beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. The adoption of the new standardsdid not have a significant impact on Navios Acquisition’s consolidated financial statements.Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and EmployeesA. Directors and Senior ManagementSet forth below are the names, ages and positions of Navios Acquisition’s directors, executive officers and key employees. Name Age PositionAngeliki Frangou 48 Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and DirectorTed C. Petrone 58 President and DirectorNikolaos Veraros, CFA 43 DirectorJohn Koilalous 82 DirectorLeonidas Korres 37 Chief Financial OfficerBrigitte Noury 66 DirectorAnna Kalathakis 43 Director, Senior Vice President — Legal Risk ManagementGeorge Galatis 50 DirectorVasiliki Papaefthymiou 44 SecretaryAngeliki Frangou has been Navios Maritime Acquisition Corporation Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since inception. Ms. Frangou is alsoChairman and CEO of Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. – Navios Acquisition’s sponsor – since August 2005. In addition, Ms. Frangou serves as theChairman and Chief Executive Officer of Navios Partners, an affiliated limited partnership trading on the New York Stock Exchange, since August2007. Ms. Frangou is also the Chairman of the board of directors of Navios South American Logistics since inception in December 2007. Previously,Ms. Frangou was Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of International Shipping Enterprises Inc., which acquired Navios Holdings. Duringthe period 1990 through August 2005, Ms. Frangou was the Chief Executive Officer of Maritime Enterprises Management S.A., and its predecessorcompany, which specialized in the management of dry cargo vessels. Ms. Frangou is the Chairman of IRF European Finance Investments Ltd., listed onthe SFM of the London Stock Exchange. As of September 2012, Ms. Frangou is also serving as a Board member of Eurobank Ergasias S.A. (one of thelargest commercial banks in Greece). During the period April 2004 to July 2005, Ms. Frangou served on the board of directors of Emporiki Bank ofGreece (then, the second largest retail bank in Greece). From June 2006 until September 2008, Ms. Frangou also served as Chairman of Proton Bank,based in Athens, Greece. Ms. Frangou is Member of the Board of The United Kingdom Mutual Steam Ship Assurance Association (Bermuda) Limitedand Vice Chairman of China Classification Society Mediterranean Committee and a member of the Hellenic and Black Sea Committee of BureauVeritas as well as a member of Greek Committee of Nippon Kaiji Kyokai. Ms. Frangou received a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering fromFairleigh Dickinson University (summa cum laude) and a master’s degree in mechanical engineering from Columbia University. 66 Table of ContentsTed C. Petrone has been our President and a member of our Board of Directors since March 2008. He has also been a director of Navios Holdings sinceMay 2007, having become President of Navios Corporation in September 2006. He heads Navios Holdings’ worldwide commercial operations.Mr. Petrone has served in the maritime industry for 36 years, 33 of which he has spent with Navios Holdings. After joining Navios Holdings as anassistant vessel operator, Mr. Petrone worked there in various operational and commercial positions. For the last 15 years, Mr. Petrone has beenresponsible for all the aspects of the daily commercial activity, encompassing the trading of tonnage, derivative hedge positions and cargoes.Mr. Petrone graduated from New York Maritime College at Fort Schuyler with a B.S. in Maritime Transportation. He has also served aboard U.S. Navy(Military Sealift Command) tankers.Nikolaos Veraros, CFA, has been a member of our Board of Directors since June 2008. Mr. Veraros is a senior analyst at Investments & Finance Ltd.,where he has worked since August 2001, and also from June 1997 to February 1999. From March 1999 to August 2001, Mr. Veraros worked as a seniorequity analyst for National Securities, S.A., a subsidiary of National Bank of Greece. He is a Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA), a Certified MarketMaker for Derivatives in the Athens Stock Exchange, and a Certified Analyst from the Hellenic Capital Market Commission. Mr. Veraros received hisBachelor of Science degree in Business Administration from the Athens University of Economics and Business (graduated as valedictorian) and hisMaster of Business Administration degree in Finance/Accounting from the William E. Simon Graduate School of Business Administration at theUniversity of Rochester.John Koilalous has been a member of our Board of Directors since June 2008. Mr. Koilalous began his career in the shipping industry in the City ofLondon in 1949, having worked for various firms both in London and Piraeus. He entered the adjusting profession in 1969, having worked for Francisand Arnold for 18 years and then with Pegasus Adjusting Services Ltd., of which he was the founder and, until his retirement at the end of 2008, theManaging Director. He still remains active in an advisory capacity on matters of marine insurance claims. Mr. Koilalous is also a member of our AuditCommittee and is an independent director.Leonidas Korres has been our Chief Financial Officer since April 2010, and previously our Senior Vice President for Business Development sinceJanuary 2010. Mr. Korres served as the Special Secretary for Public Private Partnerships in the Ministry of Economy and Finance of the HellenicRepublic from October 2005 until November 2009. Prior to that, from April 2004 to October 2005, Mr. Korres served as Special Financial Advisor tothe Minister of Economy and Finance of the Hellenic Republic and as liquidator of the Organizational Committee for the Olympic Games Athens 2004S.A. From 2001 to 2004, Mr. Korres worked as a Senior Financial Advisor for KPMG Corporate Finance. From October 2007 until January 2010,Mr. Korres was a member of the board of directors of Navios Partners. From May 2003 to December 2006, Mr. Korres was Chairman of the Center forEmployment and Entrepreneurship, a non-profit Company. From June 2008 until February 2009, Mr. Korres served as a board member and auditcommittee member of Hellenic Telecommunications Organization S.A. (trading on the Athens and New York Stock Exchanges). From June 2004 untilNovember 2009, Mr. Korres served on the board of Hellenic Olympic Properties S.A., which was responsible for exploiting the Olympic venues.Mr. Korres earned his bachelor’s degree in Economics from the Athens University of Economics and Business and his master’s degree in Finance fromthe University of London.Brigitte Noury has been a member of our Board of Directors since May 2010. Ms. Noury served from March 2002 until December 2009 as Director ofCorporate & Investment Banking Asset & Recovery Management — Europe for Societe Generale. She also served from June 1989 until February 2002as Head of Shipping at Societe Generale. In addition, she served as Vice President — Shipping at Banque Indosuez from 1987 to 1989. Before thatMs. Noury served as Financial Controller at Banque Internationale pour l’Afrique Occidentale (later acquired by BNP Paribas). Ms. Noury received aMaster of Economic Sciences degree and a Diploma in Business Administration from the University of Dijon. Ms. Noury is also a member of our AuditCommittee and Nominating Committee and is an independent director.Anna Kalathakis has been a member of our board of directors and Senior Vice President — Legal Risk Management since May 2010. Ms. Kalathakishas been Chief Legal Risk Officer from November 2012, and Senior Vice President — Legal Risk Management of Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. fromDecember 2005 until October 2012. Before joining Navios Holdings, Ms. Kalathakis was the General Manager of the Greek office of A Bilbrough &Co. Ltd. (Managers of the London Steam-Ship Owners’ Mutual Insurance Association Limited, the “London P&I Club”) and an Associate Director ofthe London P&I Club where she gained experience in the handling of liability and contractual disputes in both the dry and tanker shipping sectors(including collisions, oil pollution incidents, groundings etc). She previously worked for a U.S. maritime law firm in New Orleans, having qualified as alawyer in Louisiana in 1995, and also served in a similar capacity for a London maritime law firm. She qualified as a solicitor in England and Wales in1999 and was admitted to the Piraeus Bar, Greece, in 2003. She received a bachelor’s degree International Relations from Georgetown University andholds a Masters of Business Administration degree from European University in Brussels and a Juris Doctor degree from Tulane Law School.George Galatis has served as a member of our Board of Directors since July 2010. He is currently the Executive Vice President — ProductDevelopment at Demo Pharmaceutical Industry having served as a Senior Vice President — Project 67 Table of ContentsDevelopment since 1999. Mr Galatis also served as a Technical Manager in Pharmaceutical Industry Projects at Telos Consulting Ltd. of London from1994 to 1999. Previously, Mr. Galatis served as an engineer, technical manager and product manager at various shipping companies in theUnited States and the UK. Mr. Galatis is a mechanical engineer and holds a Bachelor’s Degree in Mechanical Engineering and Master’s Degree inRobotics from the University of Newcastle upon Tyne. Mr. Galatis is also a member of our Nominating Committee and is an independent director.Vasiliki Papaefthymiou has been appointed our Secretary since inception. Ms. Papaefthymiou has been Executive Vice President — Legal and amember of Navios Holdings’ board of directors since August 25, 2005, and prior to that was a member of the board of directors of ISE.Ms. Papaefthymiou has served as General Counsel for Maritime Enterprises Management S.A. since October 2001, where she has advised the companyon shipping, corporate and finance legal matters. Ms. Papaefthymiou provided similar services as General Counsel to Franser Shipping from October1991 to September 2001. Ms. Papaefthymiou received her undergraduate degree from the Law School of the University of Athens and a master’s degreein Maritime Law from Southampton University in the United Kingdom. Ms. Papaefthymiou is admitted to practice law before the Bar in Piraeus,Greece.B. CompensationCompensationOur independent directors are entitled to receive $50,000 in cash per year, from the respective start of their service on our board of directors. Ms. Frangoureceives a fee of $150,000 per year for acting as a director and as our Chairman of the Board. No other executive officer has received any cash compensationfor services rendered.For the year ended December 31, 2012, aggregate annual compensation paid to our current non-management executive directors was $0.2 million; and $0.15million was paid to Ms. Frangou for acting as a director and as our Chairman of the Board. For the year ended December 31, 2011, aggregate annualcompensation paid to our current non-management executive directors was $0.2 million; and $0.15 million was paid to Ms. Frangou for acting as a directorand as our Chairman of the Board.C. Board PracticesBoard ClassesOur board of directors is divided into three classes with only one class of directors being elected in each year and each class serving a three-year term. Theterm of office of the first class of directors, consisting of John Koilalous, George Galatis and Brigitte Noury, will expire at our 2015 annual meeting ofstockholders, as their term was renewed for three years during our 2012 annual meeting. The term of office of the second class of directors, consisting of TedC. Petrone and Nikolaos Veraros, will expire at our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders. The term of office of the third class of directors, consisting ofAngeliki Frangou and Anna Kalathakis, will expire at our 2014 annual meeting.Director IndependenceOur board of directors has determined that Messrs. Veraros, Koilalous, Galatis and Ms. Noury are “independent directors” as defined in the New York StockExchange listing standards and Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act. We will always seek to have a board of directors comprising of a majority of independentdirectors.Board committeesOur board of directors has an audit committee and a nominating committee. Our board of directors has adopted a charter for the audit committee as well as acode of conduct and ethics that governs the conduct of our directors and officers.Audit committeeOur audit committee consists of Messrs. Veraros, Koilalous and Ms. Noury. Each member of our audit committee is financially literate under the currentlisting standards of the New York Stock Exchange, and our board of directors has determined that Mr. Veraros qualifies as an “audit committee financialexpert,” as such term is defined by SEC rules. 68 Table of ContentsThe audit committee reviews the professional services and independence of our independent registered public accounting firm and our accounts, proceduresand internal controls. The audit committee also selects our independent registered public accounting firm, reviews and approves the scope of the annualaudit, reviews and evaluates with the independent public accounting firm our annual audit and annual consolidated financial statements, reviews withmanagement the status of internal accounting controls, evaluates problem areas having a potential financial impact on us that may be brought to thecommittee’s attention by management, the independent registered public accounting firm or the board of directors, and evaluates all of our public financialreporting documents.Any expense reimbursements payable to members of our audit committee are reviewed and approved by our board of directors, with the interested director ordirectors abstaining from such review and approval.Nominating committeeA nominating committee of the board of directors has been established, which consists of Messrs. Veraros, Koilalous, Galatis, and Ms. Noury, each of whom isan independent director. The nominating committee is responsible for overseeing the selection of persons to be nominated to serve on our board of directors.The nominating committee considers persons identified by its members, management, stockholders, investment bankers and others.Code of conduct and ethicsWe have adopted a code of conduct and ethics applicable to our directors and officers in accordance with applicable federal securities laws and the rules ofthe New York Stock Exchange.Conflicts of InterestStockholders and potential investors should be aware of the following potential conflicts of interest: • None of our officers and directors is required to commit their full time to our affairs and, accordingly, they will have conflicts of interest in allocatingmanagement time among various business activities, including those related to Navios Holdings and Navios Partners. • Each of our directors has, or may come to have other fiduciary obligations. Angeliki Frangou, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, is theChairman and Chief Executive Officer of Navios Holdings and Navios Partners. In addition, Ms. Frangou is the Chairman of the board of directors ofIRF European Finance Investments, Ltd. Ted C. Petrone, our president and a member of our board of directors, is the president of Navios Corporation, asubsidiary of Navios Holdings, and a director of Navios Holdings. Mr. Veraros is a senior analyst at Investments & Finance, Ltd., an investmentbanking firm specializing in the shipping industry. Mr. Koilalous is the founder and managing director of Pegasus Adjusting Services, Ltd., anadjusting firm in the shipping industry. Ms. Kalathakis is Chief Legal Risk Officer of Navios Holdings. • We have entered a Management Agreement, expiring May 28, 2015, with a subsidiary of Navios Holdings, pursuant to which such subsidiary providescertain commercial and technical ship management services for a fixed daily fee of $6,000 per owned MR2 product tanker and chemical tanker vessel,$7,000 per owned LR1 product tanker vessel and $10,000 per owned VLCC tanker vessel for the first four years of the term of that agreement. • We entered into an Administrative Services Agreement with Navios Holdings, expiring on May 28, 2015, pursuant to which a subsidiary of NaviosHoldings provides certain administrative management services to Navios Acquisition which include: bookkeeping, audit and accounting services,legal and insurance services, administrative and clerical services, banking and financial services, advisory services, client and investor relations andother. Navios Holdings is reimbursed for reasonable costs and expenses incurred in connection with the provision of these services. • We have not adopted a policy that expressly prohibits our directors, officers, security holders or affiliates from having a direct or indirect pecuniaryinterest in any investment to be acquired or disposed of by us or in any transaction to which we are a party or have an interest. Nor do we have a policythat expressly prohibits any such persons from engaging for their own account in business activities of the types conducted by us. Accordingly, suchparties may have an interest in certain transactions in which we are involved, and may also compete with us.We cannot assure you that any of the above mentioned conflicts will be resolved in our favor.Navios Holdings has a significant ownership interest. As a result of Navios Holdings’ significant ownership stake in us and our common management, thereare certain potential conflicts of interest, including potential competition as to acquisition targets and, after an acquisition has been consummated, potentialcompetition and business relationships with each other. 69 Table of ContentsAll ongoing and future transactions between us and any of our officers and directors or their respective affiliates, including Navios Holdings, will be on termsbelieved by us to be no less favorable than are available from unaffiliated third parties, and such transactions will require prior approval, in each instance, bya unanimous vote of our disinterested “independent” directors or the members of our board who do not have an interest in the transaction.Please see “Item 7.-Major Stockholders and Related Party Transactions”.FacilitiesWe do not own any real estate or other physical property. Our headquarters are located at 85 Akti Miaouli Street, Piraeus, Greece 185 38.D. EmployeesEmployees of Navios Holdings and its subsidiaries provide assistance to us and our operating subsidiaries pursuant to the management agreement and theadministrative services agreement; therefore Navios Acquisition does not employ additional staff.The Manager crews its vessels primarily with Greek, Filipino, Romanian, Russian and Ukranian officers and Filipino seamen. The Manager is responsible forselecting its Greek officers. For other nationalities, officers and seamen are referred to us by local crewing agencies. Navios Acquisition requires that all of itsseamen have the qualifications and licenses required to comply with international regulations and shipping conventions.Navios Holdings also provides on-shore advisory, operational and administrative support to us pursuant to service agreements. Please see “Item 7.-MajorStockholders and Related Party Transactions”.E. Share OwnershipThe following table sets forth certain information regarding beneficial ownership, based on 75,764,204 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 19,2013, of our common stock held by Navios Holdings, each of our officers and directors and by all of our directors and officers as a group. The information isnot necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purposes.Unless otherwise indicated, we believe that all persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stockbeneficially owned by them. Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1) Amount ofBeneficialOwnership PercentageofCommonStock Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. 35,875,851 47.4%Angeliki Frangou 1,902,628 2.5%Ted C. Petrone * * Nikolaos Veraros * * George Galatis — * John Koilalous * * Birgitte Noury — * Anna Kalathakis — * Leonidas Korres * * All of our officers and directors as a group 2,035,801 2.7% *less than one (1%) percent.(1)Unless otherwise indicated, the business address of each of the individuals is c/o Navios Maritime Holdings Inc., 85 Akti Miaouli Street, Piraeus,Greece.(2)Navios Holdings is a U.S. public company controlled by its board of directors, which consists of the following seven members: Angeliki Frangou (ourChairman and Chief Executive Officer), Vasiliki Papaefthymiou, Ted C. Petrone (our president), Spyridon Magoulas, John Stratakis, Stathis Loizos andGeorge Malanga.(3)Includes 1,502,628 shares held by Amadeus Maritime S.A. that may be deemed to be beneficially owned by Ms. Frangou. 70(2)(2)(3)(3) Table of ContentsItem 7. Major Stockholders and Related Party TransactionsA. Major StockholdersThe following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of our common stock by each person we know to beneficially own more than 5% of our common stockbased upon 75,764,204 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 19, 2013 and the amounts and percentages as are contained in the public filings ofsuch persons and based on knowledge of the Company. The number of shares of common stock beneficially owned by each person is determined under SECrules and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under SEC rules, a person beneficially owns any units asto which the person has or shares voting or investment power. In addition, a person beneficially owns any shares of common stock that the person or entityhas the right to acquire as of March 19, 2013 through the exercise of any right. All of the stockholders, including the stockholders listed in this table, areentitled to one vote per share of common stock held. Name of Beneficial Owner Amount ofBeneficialOwnership PercentageofCommonStock Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. 35,875,851 47.4%A. Lawrence Caroll Trust 7,260,000 9.6% (1)The business address of the reporting person is 85 Akti Miaouli Street, Piraeus, Greece 185 38. The foregoing information was derived from aSchedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on March 19, 2013.(2)The business address of the reporting person is 415 L’Ambiance Drive, 804 Longboat Key, FL 34228. The foregoing information was derived from aschedule 13G/A with the SEC on January 29, 2013.B. Related Party TransactionsOn May 28, 2010, Navios Acquisition consummated the vessel acquisition, which constituted its initial business combination. In connection with thestockholder vote to approve the business combination, holders of 10,021,399 shares of common stock voted against the business combination and elected toredeem their shares in exchange for an aggregate of approximately $99.3 million, which amount was disbursed from Navios Acquisition’s investments held intrust account on May 28, 2010. In addition, on May 28, 2010, Navios Acquisition disbursed an aggregate of $8.9 million from the trust account to theunderwriters of its IPO for deferred fees. After disbursement of approximately $76.5 million to Navios Holdings to reimburse it for the first equity installmentpayment on the vessels of $38.8 million and other associated payments, the balance of the trust account of $66.1 million was released to Navios Acquisitionfor general operating expenses. Following such transaction, Navios Acquisition commenced its operations as an operating company and was controlled byNavios Holdings and is consolidated into its financial statements.Navios Acquisition entered into a $40.0 million credit facility with Navios Holdings. The $40.0 million facility has a margin of LIBOR plus 300 bps.Pursuant to an agreement dated November 8, 2011, the Navios Holdings credit facility was extended from April 2012 to December 2014. Pursuant to anamendment in October 2010, the facility will be available for multiple drawings up to a limit of $40.0 million. As of December 31, 2011, the outstandingamount under this facility was $40.0 million and interest accrued under this facility was $0.1 million and was included under amounts due to related parties.For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, interest expense in relation to this facility amounted to $1.2 million, $0.7 million and $0.2 million,respectively, and was included under interest expense and finance cost, net in the statement of operations. As of December 31, 2012, the outstanding amountunder this facility was $35.0 million and accrued interest under this facility was below $0.1 million and was included under amounts due to related parties.Pursuant to an Exchange Agreement entered into March 30, 2011, Navios Holdings exchanged 7,676,000 shares of Navios Acquisition’s common stock itheld for 1,000 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock of Navios Acquisition. Dividend paid to the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock was $1.5million and $0.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.On February 26, 2013, Navios Acquisition completed the private placement of 17,702,491 shares of common stock at a price of $2.85 per share, to NaviosHoldings and certain members of management of Navios Acquisition, Navios Holdings and Navios Partners, raising gross proceeds of $50.5 million. The netproceeds of this private placement, including the agents’ fees of $2.0 million, were $48.5 million. On February 26, 2013, Navios Acquisition entered into aregistration rights agreement with Navios Holdings and certain members of management of Navios Acquisition, Navios Holdings and Navios Partners whopurchased shares in the private placement, providing for standard “piggy-back” and demand registration rights with respect to the shares purchased in theprivate placement. 71(1)(2) Table of ContentsThe Management AgreementWe have entered into a five-year Management Agreement with the Manager, pursuant to which the Manager will provide certain commercial and technicalship management services to us. These services will be provided in a commercially reasonable manner in accordance with customary ship managementpractice and under our direction. The Manager will provide these services to us directly but may subcontract for certain of these services with other entities,including other Navios Holdings subsidiaries.The commercial and technical management services will include: • the commercial and technical management of vessels: managing day-to-day vessel operations including negotiating charters and other employmentcontracts for the vessels and monitoring payments thereunder, ensuring regulatory compliance, arranging for the vetting of vessels, procuring andarranging for port entrance and clearance, appointing counsel and negotiating the settlement of all claims in connection with the operation of eachvessel, appointing adjusters and surveyors and technical consultants as necessary, and providing technical support; • vessel maintenance and crewing: including the supervision of the maintenance and general efficiency of vessels and ensuring the vessels are inseaworthy and good operating condition, arranging our hire of qualified officers and crew, arranging for all transportation, board and lodging of thecrew, negotiating the settlement and payment of all wages; and • purchasing and insurance: purchasing stores, supplies and parts for vessels, arranging insurance for vessels (including marine hull and machineryinsurance, protection and indemnity insurance and war risk and oil pollution insurance).The initial term of the Management Agreement will expire May 28, 2015. Pursuant to the terms of the Management Agreement, we will pay the Manager afixed daily fee of $6,000 per owned MR2 product tanker and chemical tanker vessel, $7,000 per owned LR1 product tanker vessel and $10,000 per ownedVLCC vessel, for the first two years of the term of that agreement, with the fixed daily fees adjusted for the remainder of the term based on then-current marketfees. On May 4, 2012, Navios Acquisition amended its existing Management Agreement with the Manager, to fix the fees for ship management services of itsowned fleet at current rates for two additional years, through May 28, 2014.This fixed daily fee will cover all of our vessel operating expenses, other thancertain extraordinary fees and costs. During the remaining three years of the term of the Management Agreement, we expect that we will reimburse theManager for all of the actual operating costs and expenses it incurs in connection with the management of our fleet. Actual operating costs and expenses willbe determined in a manner consistent with how the initial fees were determined. Drydocking expenses will be fixed under this agreement for up to $300,000per vessel and will be reimbursed at cost for VLCC vessels. Commencing as of March 30, 2012, Navios Acquisition can, upon request to the Manager,partially or fully defer the reimbursement of drydocking and other extraordinary fees and expenses under the Agreement to a later date, but not later thanJanuary 4, 2014, and if reimbursed on a later date, such amounts will bear interest at a rate of 1% per annum over LIBOR. Commencing as of September 28,2012, Navios Acquisition could, upon request, reimburse the Manager partially or fully, for any fixed management fees outstanding for a period of not morethan nine months under the Agreement at a later date, but not later than December 31, 2014, and if reimbursed on a later date, such amounts will bear interestat a rate of 1% per annum over LIBOR. Total management fees for each of the year ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 amounted to $47.0 million,$35.7 million and $9.8 million, respectively.The Management Agreement may be terminated prior to the end of its initial term by us upon 120-days’ notice if there is a change of control of the Manageror by the Manager upon 120-days’ notice if there is a change of control of Navios Acquisition. In addition, the Management Agreement may be terminatedby us or by the Manager upon 120-days’ notice if: • the other party breaches the agreement; • a receiver is appointed for all or substantially all of the property of the other party; • an order is made to wind up the other party; • a final judgment or order that materially and adversely affects the other party’s ability to perform the Management Agreement is obtained orentered and not vacated or discharged; or • the other party makes a general assignment for the benefit of its creditors, files a petition in bankruptcy or liquidation or commences anyreorganization proceedings.Furthermore, at any time after the first anniversary of the Management Agreement, the Management Agreement may be terminated prior to the end of itsinitial term by us or by the Manager upon 365-days’ notice for any reason other than those described above. 72 Table of ContentsIn addition to the fixed daily fees payable under the Management Agreement, the Management Agreement provides that the Manager will be entitled toreasonable supplementary remuneration for extraordinary fees and costs resulting from: • time spent on insurance and salvage claims; • time spent vetting and pre-vetting the vessels by any charterers in excess of 10 days per vessel per year; • the deductible of any insurance claims relating to the vessels or for any claims that are within such deductible range; • the significant increase in insurance premiums which are due to factors such as “acts of God” outside the control of the Manager; • repairs, refurbishment or modifications, including those not covered by the guarantee of the shipbuilders or by the insurance covering thevessels, resulting from maritime accidents, collisions, other accidental damage or unforeseen events (except to the extent that such accidents,collisions, damage or events are due to the fraud, gross negligence or willful misconduct of the Manager, its employees or its agents, unless andto the extent otherwise covered by insurance); • expenses imposed due to any improvement, upgrade or modification to, structural changes with respect to the installation of new equipmentaboard any vessel that results from a change in, an introduction of new, or a change in the interpretation of, applicable laws, at therecommendation of the classification society for that vessel or otherwise; • costs associated with increases in crew employment expenses resulting from an introduction of new, or a change in the interpretation of,applicable laws or resulting from the early termination of the charter of any vessel; • any taxes, dues or fines imposed on the vessels or the Manager due to the operation of the vessels; • expenses incurred in connection with the sale or acquisition of a vessel such as inspections and technical assistance; and • any similar costs, liabilities and expenses that were not reasonably contemplated by us and the Manager as being encompassed by or acomponent of the fixed daily fees at the time the fixed daily fees were determined.Under the Management Agreement, neither we nor the Manager will be liable for failure to perform any of our or its obligations, respectively, under theManagement Agreement by reason of any cause beyond our or its reasonable control.In addition, the Manager will have no liability for any loss arising in the course of the performance of the commercial and technical management servicesunder the Management Agreement unless and to the extent that such loss is proved to have resulted solely from the fraud, gross negligence or willfulmisconduct of the Manager or its employees, in which case (except where such loss has resulted from the Manager’s intentional personal act or omission andwith knowledge that such loss would probably result) the Manager’s liability will be limited to $3.0 million for each incident or series of related incidents.Further, under our Management Agreement, we have agreed to indemnify the Manager and its employees and agents against all actions that may be broughtagainst them under the Management Agreement including, without limitation, all actions brought under the environmental laws of any jurisdiction, orotherwise relating to pollution or the environment, and against and in respect of all costs and expenses they may suffer or incur due to defending or settlingsuch action; provided, however, that such indemnity excludes any or all losses which may be caused by or due to the fraud, gross negligence or willfulmisconduct of the Manager or its employees or agents, or any breach of the Management Agreement by the Manager.The Administrative Services AgreementWe have entered into an Administrative Services Agreement, expiring May 28, 2015, with the Manager, pursuant to which the Manager will provide certainadministrative management services to us.The Administrative Services Agreement may be terminated prior to the end of its term by us upon 120-days’ notice if there is a change of control of theManager or by the Manager upon 120-days’ notice if there is a change of control of us. In addition, the Administrative Services Agreement may be terminatedby us or by the Manager upon 120-days’ notice if: • the other party breaches the agreement; • a receiver is appointed for all or substantially all of the property of the other party; • an order is made to wind up the other party; • a final judgment or order that materially and adversely affects the other party’s ability to perform the Administrative Services Agreement isobtained or entered and not vacated or discharged; or • the other party makes a general assignment for the benefit of its creditors, files a petition in bankruptcy or liquidation or commences anyreorganization proceedings.Furthermore, at any time after the first anniversary of the Administrative Services Agreement, the Administrative Services Agreement may be terminated by usor by the Manager upon 365-days’ notice for any reason other than those described above. 73 Table of ContentsThe administrative services will include: • bookkeeping, audit and accounting services: assistance with the maintenance of our corporate books and records, assistance with the preparationof our tax returns and arranging for the provision of audit and accounting services; • legal and insurance services: arranging for the provision of legal, insurance and other professional services and maintaining our existence andgood standing in necessary jurisdictions; • administrative and clerical services: providing office space, arranging meetings for our security holders, arranging the provision of IT services,providing all administrative services required for subsequent debt and equity financings and attending to all other administrative mattersnecessary to ensure the professional management of our business; • banking and financial services: providing cash management including assistance with preparation of budgets, overseeing banking services andbank accounts, arranging for the deposit of funds, negotiating loan and credit terms with lenders and monitoring and maintaining compliancetherewith; • advisory services: assistance in complying with United States and other relevant securities laws; • client and investor relations: arranging for the provision of, advisory, clerical and investor relations services to assist and support us in ourcommunications with our security holders; and client and investor relations; and • integration of any acquired businesses.We will reimburse the Manager for reasonable costs and expenses incurred in connection with the provision of these services within 15 days after theManager submits to us an invoice for such costs and expenses, together with any supporting detail that may be reasonably required.Under the Administrative Services Agreement, we have agreed to indemnify the Manager and its employees against all actions which may be brought againstthem under the Administrative Services. Agreement including, without limitation, all actions brought under the environmental laws of any jurisdiction, andagainst and in respect of all costs and expenses they may suffer or incur due to defending or settling such actions; provided, however, that such indemnityexcludes any or all losses that may be caused by or due to the fraud, gross negligence or willful misconduct of the Manager or its employees or agents. For theyears ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 the administrative services rendered by the Manager amounted to $2.1 million, $1.5 million and $0.4million, respectively.Registration RightsPursuant to a registration rights agreement between us and our initial stockholders entered into in connection with the IPO, the holders of the sponsor units(and the common stock and warrants comprising such units and the common stock issuable upon exercise of such warrants), the sponsor warrants (and thecommon stock issuable upon exercise of such warrants), the co-investment shares and any shares of common stock purchased pursuant to the limit ordersdescribed above are entitled to three demand registration rights, “piggy-back” registration rights and short-form resale registration rights. We will bear theexpenses incurred in connection with any such registration statements other than underwriting discounts or commissions for shares not sold by us. Inaddition, we have registered the 1,677,759 shares of common stock issued in connection with the VLCC Acquisition. The resale registration statementbecame effective on January 19, 2011.In addition, in connection with the private placement of 17,702,491 shares, that was completed on February 26, 2013, we have granted registration rights toNavios Holdings and certain members of the management of Navios Acquisition, Navios Holdings and Navios Partners.The Acquisition Omnibus AgreementWe have entered an Acquisition Omnibus Agreement with Navios Holdings and Navios Partners. The following discussion describes certain provisions of theAcquisition Omnibus Agreement.NoncompetitionNavios Holdings and Navios Partners agree not to acquire, charter-in or own Liquid Shipment Vessels (as hereinafter defined). For purposes of the AcquisitionOmnibus Agreement, “Liquid Shipment Vessels” means vessels intended primarily for the sea going shipment of liquid products, including chemical andpetroleum-based products, except for container vessels and vessels that will be employed primarily in operations in South America. This restriction will notprevent Navios Holdings or any of its controlled affiliates or Navios Partners (other than us and our subsidiaries) from: (1)acquiring a Liquid Shipment Vessel(s) from us for fair market value; 74 Table of Contents (2)acquiring a Liquid Shipment Vessel(s) as part of the acquisition of a controlling interest in a business or package of assets and owning thosevessels; provided, however, that: a.if less than a majority of the value of the total assets or business acquired is attributable to a Liquid Shipment Vessel(s) and relatedcharters, as determined in good faith by the board of directors of Navios Holdings or Navios Partners, as the case may be, NaviosHoldings or Navios Partners, as the case may be, must offer to sell a Liquid Shipment Vessel(s) and related charters to us for theirfair market value plus any additional tax or other similar costs to Navios Holdings that would be required to transfer a LiquidShipment Vessel(s) and related charters to us separately from the acquired business; and b.if a majority or more of the value of the total assets or business acquired is attributable to a Liquid Shipment Vessel(s) and relatedcharters, as determined in good faith by the board of directors of Navios Holdings or Navios Partners, as the case may be, NaviosHoldings or Partners, as the case may be, shall notify us in writing, of the proposed acquisition. We shall, not later than the 15thcalendar day following receipt of such notice, notify Navios Holdings or Navios Partners, as the case may be, if we wish to acquiresuch a Liquid Shipment Vessel(s) and related charters forming part of the business or package of assets in cooperation andsimultaneously with Navios Holdings or Navios Partners, as the case may be, acquiring a Liquid Shipment Vessel(s) and relatedcharters forming part of that business or package of assets. If we do not notify Navios Holdings of our intent to pursue theacquisition within 15 calendar days, Navios Holdings may proceed with the acquisition as provided in (a) above. (3)acquiring a non-controlling interest in any company, business or pool of assets; (4)acquiring or owning a Liquid Shipment Vessel(s) and related charter if we do not fulfill our obligation, under any existing or future writtenagreement, to purchase such vessel in accordance with the terms of any such agreement; (5)acquiring or owning a Liquid Shipment Vessel(s) subject to the offers to us described in paragraphs (3) and (4) above pending our determinationwhether to accept such offers and pending the closing of any offers we accept; (6)providing ship management services relating to any vessel whatsoever, including to a Liquid Shipment Vessel(s) owned by the controlledaffiliates of Navios Holdings; or (7)acquiring or owning a Liquid Shipment Vessel(s) if we have previously advised Navios Holdings or Navios Partners, as the case may be, that weconsent to such acquisition, or if we have been offered the opportunity to purchase such vessel pursuant to the Acquisition Omnibus Agreementand failed to do so.If Navios Holdings or Navios Partners, as the case may be, or any of their respective controlled affiliates (other than us or our subsidiaries) acquires or owns aLiquid Shipment Vessel(s) pursuant to any of the exceptions described above, it may not subsequently expand that portion of its business other than pursuantto those exceptions.In addition, under the Acquisition Omnibus Agreement we have agreed, and will cause our subsidiaries to agree, not to acquire, own, operate or charterdrybulk carriers (“Drybulk Carriers”). Pursuant to an agreement between them, Navios Holdings and Navios Partners may be entitled to a priority over eachother depending on the class and charter length of any Drybulk Carrier. This restriction will not: (1)prevent us or any of our subsidiaries from acquiring a Drybulk Carrier(s) and any related charters as part of the acquisition of a controllinginterest in a business or package of assets and owning and operating or chartering those vessels; provided, however, that: (a)if less than a majority of the value of the total assets or business acquired is attributable to a Drybulk Carrier(s) and related charter(s), asdetermined in good faith by us, we must offer to sell such Drybulk Carrier(s) and related charter to Navios Holdings or Navios Partners, asthe case may be, for their fair market value plus any additional tax or other similar costs to us that would be required to transfer theDrybulk Carrier(s) and related charter(s) to Navios Holdings or Navios Partners, as the case may be, separately from the acquired business;and (b)if a majority or more of the value of the total assets or business acquired is attributable to a Drybulk Carrier(s) and related charter(s), asdetermined in good faith by us, we shall notify Navios Holdings or Navios Partners, as the case may be, in writing of the proposedacquisition. Navios Holdings or Navios Partners, as the case may be, shall, not later than the 15th calendar day following receipt of suchnotice, notify us if it wishes to acquire the Drybulk Carrier(s) forming part of the business or package of assets in cooperation andsimultaneously with us acquiring the Non-Drybulk Carrier assets forming part of that business or package of assets. If Navios Holdingsand Navios Partners do not notify us of its intent to pursue the acquisition within 15 calendar days, we may proceed with the acquisitionas provided in (a) above. (2)prevent us or any of our subsidiaries from owning, operating or chartering a Drybulk Carrier(s) subject to the offer to Navios Holdings or NaviosPartners described in paragraph (1) above, pending its determination whether to accept such offer and pending the closing of any offer it accepts;or (3)prevent us or any of our subsidiaries from acquiring, operating or chartering a Drybulk Carrier(s) if Navios Holdings and Navios Partners haspreviously advised us that it consents to such acquisition, operation or charter, or if they have previously been offered the opportunity topurchase such Drybulk Carrier(s) and have declined to do so. 75 Table of ContentsIf we or any of our subsidiaries owns, operates and charters Drybulk Carriers pursuant to any of the exceptions described above, neither we nor suchsubsidiary may subsequently expand that portion of our business other than pursuant to those exceptions.Rights of First OfferUnder the Acquisition Omnibus Agreement, we and our subsidiaries will grant to Navios Holdings and Navios Partners, as the case may be, a right of firstoffer on any proposed sale, transfer or other disposition of any of our Drybulk Carriers and related charters owned or acquired by us. Likewise, NaviosHoldings and Navios Partners will agree (and will cause its subsidiaries to agree) to grant a similar right of first offer to us for any Liquid Shipment Vessels itmight own. These rights of first offer will not apply to a: (a) sale, transfer or other disposition of vessels between any affiliated subsidiaries, or pursuant to theterms of any charter or other agreement with a counterparty; or (b) merger with or into, or sale of substantially all of the assets to, an unaffiliated third party.Prior to engaging in any negotiation regarding any vessel disposition with respect to a Liquid Shipment Vessel(s) with a non-affiliated third party or anyDrybulk Carrier(s) and related charter, we, Navios Holdings, or Navios Partners, as the case may be, will deliver a written notice to the other parties settingforth the material terms and conditions of the proposed transaction. During the 15-day period after the delivery of such notice, we, Navios Holdings or NaviosPartners, as the case may be, will negotiate in good faith to reach an agreement on the transaction. If we do not reach an agreement within such 15-day period,we or Navios Holdings or Navios Partners, as the case may be, will be able within the next 180 calendar days to sell, transfer or dispose of the vessel to a thirdparty (or to agree in writing to undertake such transaction with a third party) on terms generally no less favorable to us or Navios Holdings, as the case maybe, than those offered pursuant to the written notice.Upon a change of control of Navios Partners, the noncompetition and the right of first offer provisions of the Acquisition Omnibus Agreement will terminateimmediately as to Navios Partners, but shall remain binding on us and Navios Holdings. Upon a change of control of Navios Holdings, the noncompetitionand the right of first offer provisions of the Acquisition Omnibus Agreement shall terminate; provided, however, that in no event shall the noncompetitionand the rights of first refusal terminate upon a change of control of Navios Holdings prior to the fourth anniversary of the Acquisition Omnibus Agreement.Upon change of control of us, the noncompetition and the right of first offer provisions of the Acquisition Omnibus Agreement will terminate immediately asto all parties of the Acquisition Omnibus Agreement.C. Interest of Experts and CounselNot Applicable.Item 8. Financial InformationA. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial InformationConsolidated Financial Statements: See Item 18.Legal ProceedingsAlthough we may, from time to time, be involved in litigation and claims arising out of our operations in the normal course of business, we are not at presentparty to any legal proceedings or aware of any proceedings against us, or contemplated to be brought against us, that would have a material effect on ourbusiness, financial position, results of operations or liquidity. We maintain insurance policies with insurers in amounts and with coverage and deductibles asour board of directors believes are reasonable and prudent. We expect that these claims would be covered by insurance, subject to customary deductibles.Those claims, even if lacking merit, could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources.Dividend PolicyAt the present time, Navios Acquisition intends to retain most of its available earnings generated by operations for the development and growth of thebusiness. The continued declaration and payment of any dividend remains subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors, and will depend on, amongother things, Navios Acquisition’s cash requirements as measured by market opportunities and conditions. In addition, the terms and provisions of our currentsecured credit facilities and our indenture limit our ability to pay dividends in excess of certain amounts or if certain covenants are not met. (See also “LongTerm Debt Obligations and Credit Arrangements.”) 76 Table of ContentsOn February 13, 2012, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend in respect of the fourth quarter of 2011 of $0.05 per common share ofcommon stock. A dividend in the aggregate amount of $2.4 million was paid on April 5, 2012 out of which $2.0 million was paid to the stockholders ofrecord as of March 22, 2012 and $0.4 million was paid to the holder of 1,000 shares of the Series C preferred stock which is Navios Holdings (see note 17 ofthe financial statements included herein).On May 4, 2012, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend in respect of the first quarter of 2012 of $0.05 per share of common stock. Adividend in the aggregate amount of $2.4 million was paid on July 3, 2012 out of which $2.0 million was paid to the stockholders of record as of June 20,2012 and $0.4 million was paid to the holder of 1,000 shares of the Series C preferred stock which is Navios Holdings (see note 17 of the financial statementsincluded herein).On August 13, 2012, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend in respect of the second quarter of 2012 of $0.05 per share of common stock. Adividend in the aggregate amount of $2.4 million was paid on October 3, 2012 out of which $2.0 million was paid to the stockholders of record as ofSeptember 19, 2012 and $0.4 was paid to the holder of 1,000 shares of the Series C preferred stock which is Navios Holdings (see note 17 of the financialstatements included herein).On November 9, 2012, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend in respect of the third quarter of 2012 of $0.05 per share of common stock. Adividend in the aggregate amount of $2.4 million was paid on January 4, 2013 out of which $2.0 million was paid to the stockholders of record as ofDecember 19, 2012 and $0.4 million was paid to the holder of 1,000 shares of the Series C preferred stock which is Navios Holdings (see note 17 of thefinancial statements included herein).As of December 31, 2012, Navios Acquisition paid a dividend of $0.1 million to the holders of the 540 shares of Series B preferred stock.On February 7, 2013, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend in respect of the fourth quarter of 2012 of $0.05 per common share payable onApril 4, 2013 to stockholders of record as of March 19, 2013.B. Significant ChangesNot Applicable.Item 9. Listing DetailsOur listing of securities are traded on the New York Stock Exchange and comprised of units under the symbol “NNA.U”, of common stock and warrants underthe symbols “NNA” and “NNA.WS”, respectively.The following table sets forth the high and low closing sales prices of Navios Acquisition’s units, common stock and warrants on the New York StockExchange. Price RangeUnits Price RangeCommon Stock Price RangeWarrants High Low High Low High Low Year Ended: December 31, 2012 $3.75 $2.70 $3.66 $2.11 $0.19 $0.05 December 31, 2011 $5.54 $2.70 $4.55 $2.51 $0.80 $0.15 December 31, 2010 $11.54 $4.96 $9.95 $3.84 $1.58 $0.45 December 31, 2009 $10.55 $8.61 $9.90 $8.57 $0.81 $0.16 December 31, 2008 $10.20 $8.40 $9.40 $8.08 $1.05 $0.14 Quarter Ended: March 31, 2013 (through March 20, 2013) $3.40 $2.83 $3.39 $2.45 $0.09 $0.03 December 31, 2012 $3.13 $2.83 $3.05 $2.11 $0.17 $0.06 September 30, 2012 $3.13 $2.70 $3.08 $2.30 $0.19 $0.07 June 30, 2012 $3.49 $2.71 $3.31 $2.26 $0.17 $0.05 March 31, 2012 $3.75 $2.70 $3.66 $2.68 $0.19 $0.19 December 31, 2011 $3.55 $2.70 $3.50 $2.51 $0.22 $0.18 September 30, 2011 $4.15 $3.40 $4.05 $3.03 $0.42 $0.15 June 30, 2011 $5.54 $4.15 $4.13 $3.52 $0.62 $0.42 March 31, 2011 $4.96 $4.96 $4.55 $3.92 $0.80 $0.43 Month Ended: March 31, 2013 (through March 20, 2013) $3.40 $3.12 $3.39 $2.99 $0.08 $0.06 February 28, 2013 $3.12 $2.89 $3.30 $2.67 $0.08 $0.04 January 31, 2013 $2.85 $2.83 $2.78 $2.45 $0.09 $0.06 December 31, 2012 $2.90 $2.83 $2.50 $2.11 $0.15 $0.06 November 30, 2012 $3.10 $2.90 $2.96 $2.52 $0.15 $0.15 October 31, 2012 $3.10 $2.95 $3.05 $2.62 $0.17 $0.13 September 30, 2012 $3.13 $2.85 $3.04 $2.60 $0.16 $0.12 77(1),(2) Table of Contents(1)Period beginning July 1, 2008.(2)The Company completed its initial vessel acquisition on May 28, 2010. Prior to such date, the Company was not an operating company and,accordingly, prices prior to such date may not be meaningful.Item 10. Additional InformationA. Share CapitalNot applicable.B. Memorandum and Articles of AssociationPlease refer to the filings on Form 6-K (file number 001-34104) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission: Exhibit 99.9 of Form 6-K filed onJune 4, 2010, Exhibit 3.1 of Form 6-K filed on February 10, 2011, Exhibit 1.1 of Form 6-K filed on September 21, 2010, Exhibit 1.1 of Form 6-K filed onNovember 9, 2010, and Exhibit 1.1 to Form 6-K filed on April 12, 2011, which the Company hereby incorporates by reference.C. Material ContractsThe following is a summary of each material contract, other than material contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business, to which we or any of oursubsidiaries is a party, for the two years immediately preceding the date of this Annual Report, each of which is included in the list of exhibits in Item 19. • Indenture, dated October 21, 2010, among Navios Acquisition, Navios Acquisition Finance, the guarantors party thereto and Wells Fargo Bank,National Association (“Wells Fargo”), as trustee and collateral trustee (the “Indenture”). Please read “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review andProspects” for a summary of certain contract terms. • First Supplemental Indenture, dated November 9, 2010, among Navios Acquisition, Navios Acquisition Finance, the guarantors party thereto and WellsFargo, which was entered into in order to add the entities identified in such First Supplemental Indenture as guarantors to the Indenture. • Second Supplemental Indenture, dated May 20, 2011, among Navios Acquisition, Navios Acquisition Finance, the guarantors party thereto and WellsFargo, which was entered into in order to add the entity identified in such Second Supplemental Indenture as a guarantor to the Indenture. • Third Supplemental Indenture, dated May 26, 2011, among Navios Acquisition, Navios Acquisition Finance, the guarantors party thereto and WellsFargo, to ratify and confirm the Indenture following the issuance of the Additional Notes. Please read “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review andProspects” for a summary of certain terms relating to the Additional Notes. • Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated July 1, 2011, among Navios Acquisition, Navios Acquisition Finance, the guarantors party thereto and WellsFargo, which was entered into in order to add the entities identified in such Fourth Supplemental Indenture as guarantors to the Indenture. • Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated December 15, 2011, among Navios Acquisition, Navios Acquisition Finance, the guarantors party thereto andWells Fargo, which was entered into in order to add the entities identified in such Fifth Supplemental Indenture as guarantors to the Indenture. 78 Table of Contents• Repurchase Plan, dated April 8, 2010, among Navios Acquisition, Navios Holdings, Amadeus Maritime S.A. (“Amadeus”) and J.P. Morgan SecuritiesInc. (“J.P. Morgan”) whereby Navios Holdings and Angeliki Frangou agreed to acquire through J.P. Morgan or a third party, $60.0 million of NaviosAcquisition’s common stock in open market purchases or privately negotiated purchases. This agreement terminated upon the consummation of thevessel acquisition. • Amendment to Buyback Agreement and Assumption Agreement, dated April 8, 2010, among Navios Acquisition, Navios Holdings, Amadeus, J.P.Morgan and Deutsche Bank Securities Inc., which, among other things, substituted Navios Holdings for certain of the parties under the originalagreement. This agreement terminated upon the consummation of the vessel acquisition. • Amendment to Co-Investment Share Subscription Agreement and Assumption Agreement, dated April 8, 2010, among Navios Acquisition, NaviosHoldings and Amadeus, which, among other things, substituted Navios Holdings for certain of the parties under the original agreement. This agreementterminated upon the consummation of the vessel acquisition. • Acquisition Agreement, dated April 8, 2010, between Navios Acquisition and Navios Holdings. Please read “Item 5. Operating and Financial Reviewand Prospects” for a summary of certain contract terms. • Management Agreement, dated May 28, 2010, between Navios Acquisition and Navios Ship Management Inc. Please read “Item 7. Major Stockholdersand Related Party Transactions” for a summary of certain contract terms. • Amendment to the Management Agreement dated May 4, 2012. Please read “Item 7. Major Stockholders and Related Party Transactions” for asummary of certain contract terms. • Administrative Services Agreement, dated May 28, 2010, between Navios Acquisition and Navios Ship Management Inc. Please read “Item 7. MajorStockholders and Related Party Transactions” for a summary of certain contract terms. • Acquisition Omnibus Agreement dated May 28, 2010 among Navios Acquisition, Navios Holdings and Navios Partners. Please read “Item 7. MajorShareholders and Related Party Transactions” for a summary of certain contract terms. • Registration Rights Agreement, dated May 26, 2011, among Navios Acquisition, Navios Acquisition Finance and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner &Smith Incorporated, acting as representative for the initial purchasers named therein. Please read “Item 7. Major Stockholders and Related PartyTransactions” for a summary of certain contract terms. • Securities Purchase Agreement, dated July 18, 2010, between Navios Acquisition and Vanship Holdings Limited, entered into in connection with theVLCC Acquisition. • Credit Agreement, dated April 7, 2010, among certain vessel-owning subsidiaries and Deutsche Schiffsbank AG, Alpha Bank A.E. and Credit AgricoleCorporate and Investment Bank. Please read “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” for a summary of certain contract terms. • Credit Agreement, dated April 8, 2010, among certain vessel-owning subsidiaries and DVB Bank S.E. and Fortis Bank. Please read “Item 5. Operatingand Financial Review and Prospects” for a summary of certain contract terms. • Revolving Credit Facility for $80.0 revolving credit facility, dated September 2010, among certain vessel-owning subsidiaries and Cyprus PopularBank Co Ltd. Please read “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” for a summary of certain contract terms. • Facility Agreement for $52.0 million term loan facility, dated May 28, 2010, among certain vessel-owning subsidiaries and DVB Bank S.E. and ABNAMRO BANK N.V. Please read “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” for a summary of certain contract terms. • First Supplemental Agreement, dated December 20, 2011, to Facility Agreement dated May 28, 2010, for $52 million term loan facility, which amendscertain terms of the Facility Agreement, including providing for additional definitions relating to new charters, amending provisions relating toprepayments upon termination of charters within a certain period of time and associated adjustments to the repayment installments and providing formandatory prepayment of a minimal amount, and an associated adjustment to a future installment payment, in the event the initial charter period is notextended by July 2012. • Facility Agreement for $52.2 million term loan facility, dated October 26, 2010, between Navios Acquisition and Eurobank Ergasias S.A. Please read“Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” for a summary of certain contract terms. 79 Table of Contents• Facility Agreement for $52.0 million term loan facility, dated December 6, 2010, between Navios Acquisition and Eurobank Ergasias S.A. Please read“Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” for a summary of certain contract terms. • Facility Agreement for $55.1 million term loan facility, dated July 8, 2011, between Navios Acquisition and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. Please read“Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” for a summary of certain contract terms. • Facility Agreement for $51.0 million term loan facility, dated December 7, 2011. between Navios Acquisition and DVB Bank S.E. Please read “Item 5.Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” for a summary of certain contract terms. • Facility Agreement for up to $28.125 million term loan facility, dated December 29, 2011, between Navios Acquisition and NORDDEUTSCHELANDESBANK GIROZENTRALE. Please read “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” for a summary of certain contract terms. • Facility Agreement for $56.250 million term loan facility, dated December 29, 2011, among Navios Acquisition, DVB Bank SE and Emporiki Bank ofGreece S.A. Please read “Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects” for a summary of certain contract terms. • Loan Agreement for $40.0 million, dated September 7, 2010, between Navios Acquisition and Navios Holdings (the “Loan Agreement”). Please read“Item 7. Major Shareholders and Related Party Transactions” for a summary of certain contract terms. • Letter Agreement Nr. 1 to the Loan Agreement, dated as of October 21, 2010, which provided that the loan would be a revolving facility. • Letter Agreement Nr. 2 to the Loan Agreement, dated November 8, 2011, pursuant to which Navios Holdings agreed to extend the maturity date fromApril 1, 2012 to December 31, 2014. • Securities Purchase Agreement, dated February 26, 2013, between Navios Acquisition and Navios Holdings for the purchase by Navios Holdings of17,544,300 shares of common stock of Navios Acquisition for $2.85 per share in a private placement that was completed on February 26, 2013. • Form of Co-Investment Share Purchase Agreement, which was entered into by Navios Acquisition and certain members of the management of NaviosAcquisition, Navios Holdings and Navios Partners for the purchase of an aggregate of 158,191 shares of common stock of Navios Acquisition for $2.85per share in a private placement that was completed on February 26, 2013. • Registration Rights Agreement, dated February 26, 2013, between Navios Acquisition and Navios Holdings and the management investors partythereto. Please read “Item 7. Major Stockholders and Related Party Transactions” for a summary of certain contract terms.D. Exchange controlsUnder the laws of the of the Marshall Islands, Cayman Islands, Hong Kong and the British Virgin Islands, the countries of incorporation of the Company andits subsidiaries, there are currently no restrictions on the export or import of capital, including foreign exchange controls, or restrictions that affect theremittance of dividends, interest or other payments to non-resident holders of our common stock.E. Taxation of HoldersMATERIAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONSMarshall Islands Tax ConsiderationsWe are incorporated in the Marshall Islands. Under current Marshall Islands law, we are not subject to tax on income or capital gains, and no Marshall Islandswithholding tax will be imposed upon payments of dividends by us to our stockholders. 80 Table of ContentsMaterial U.S. Federal Income Tax ConsequencesThe following discussion addresses the material U.S. federal income tax consequences relating to the purchase, ownership and disposition of shares of ourcommon stock by beneficial owners of such shares. This discussion is based on current provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the“Code”), treasury regulations promulgated under the Code (“Treasury Regulations”), Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) rulings and pronouncements, andjudicial decisions now in effect, all of which are subject to change at any time by legislative, judicial or administrative action. Any such changes may beapplied retroactively. No rulings from the IRS have been or will be sought with respect to the U.S. federal income tax consequences discussed below. Thediscussion below is not in any way binding on the IRS or the courts nor does it in any way constitute an assurance that the U.S. federal income taxconsequences discussed herein will be accepted by the IRS or the courts.The U.S. federal income tax consequences to a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock may vary depending upon such beneficial owner’s particularsituation or status. This discussion is limited to beneficial owners of shares of our common stock who hold such shares as capital assets, and it does notaddress aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be relevant to such beneficial owners that are subject to special treatment under U.S. federal incometax laws, including but not limited to: dealers in securities; banks and other financial institutions; insurance companies; tax-exempt organizations, plans oraccounts; persons holding shares of our common stock as part of a “hedge,” “straddle” or other risk reduction transaction; persons holding shares of ourcommon stock through partnerships, trusts or other entities; beneficial owners of shares of our common stock that own 10% or more (by vote or value) of ouroutstanding capital stock; U.S. Holders (as defined below) whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar; and controlled foreign corporations or passiveforeign investment companies, as those terms are defined in the Code. In addition, this discussion does not consider the effects of any applicable foreign,state, local or other tax laws, or estate or gift tax considerations, or the alternative minimum tax.For purposes of this discussion, a “U.S. Holder” is a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock that is, for U.S. federal income tax purposes: a citizen orresident of the United States; a corporation (or other entity that is classified as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in orunder the laws of the United States or any state thereof (including the District of Columbia); an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal incometax regardless of its source; or a trust, if a court within the United States can exercise primary supervision over its administration, and one or more “UnitedStates persons” (as defined in the Code) have the authority to control all of the substantial decisions of that trust (or the trust was in existence on August 20,1996, was treated as a domestic trust on August 19, 1996 and validly elected to continue to be treated as a domestic trust).For purposes of this discussion, a beneficial owner of shares of our common stock (other than a partnership or an entity or arrangement treated as a partnershipfor U.S. federal income tax purposes) that is not a U.S. Holder is a “Non-U.S. Holder.”If a partnership or other entity or arrangement classified as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes holds shares of our common stock, the taxtreatment of its partners generally will depend upon the status of the partner, the activities of the partnership and certain determinations made at the partnerlevel. If you are a partner in a partnership holding shares of our common stock, you should consult your own tax advisor regarding the tax consequences toyou of the partnership’s ownership of shares of our common stock.We urge beneficial owners of shares of our common stock to consult their own tax advisers as to the particular tax considerations applicable to themrelating to the purchase, ownership and disposition of shares of our common stock, including the applicability of U.S. federal, state and local tax lawsand non-U.S. tax laws.U.S. Federal Income Taxation of Navios AcquisitionNavios Acquisition is a foreign company that is treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes and it neither has made, nor intends to make, anelection to be treated as other than a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Consequently, among other things, U.S. Holders will not directly besubject to U.S. federal income tax on their shares of our income, but rather will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on distributions received from us anddispositions of shares of our common stock as described below.Taxation of Operating Income: In GeneralUnless exempt from U.S. federal income taxation under the rules discussed below, a foreign corporation is subject to United States federal income taxation inrespect of any income that is derived from the use of vessels, from the hiring or leasing of vessels for use on a time, voyage or bareboat charter basis, from theparticipation in a pool, partnership, strategic alliance, joint operating agreement, code sharing arrangements or other joint venture it directly or indirectlyowns or participates in that generates such income, or from the performance of services directly related to those uses, which we refer to as “shipping income.”to the extent that the shipping income is derived from sources within the United States. For these purposes, 50% of shipping income that is attributable totransportation that begins or ends, but that does not both begin and end, in the United States constitutes income from sources within the United States, whichwe refer to as “U.S.-source shipping income.” 81 Table of ContentsShipping income attributable to transportation that both begins and ends in the United States is considered to be 100% from sources within the United States.Navios Acquisition is not permitted by law to engage in transportation that produces income which is considered to be 100% from sources within the UnitedStates.Shipping income attributable to transportation exclusively between non-U.S. ports will be considered to be 100% derived from sources outside the UnitedStates. Shipping income derived from sources outside the United States will not be subject to any United States federal income tax. In the absence ofexemption from tax under Section 883 of the Code, Navios Acquisition’s gross U.S.-source shipping income would be subject to a 4% tax imposed withoutallowance for deductions as described below.Exemption of Operating Income From U.S. Federal Income TaxationIn general, the exemption from U.S. federal income taxation under Section 883 of the Code provides that if a non-U.S. corporation satisfies the requirementsof Section 883 of the Code and the Treasury Regulations thereunder, it will not be subject to the net basis and branch profits taxes or the 4% gross basis tax(each as described below) on its U.S.-source shipping income.Under Section 883 of the Code, we will be exempt from U.S. federal income taxation on our U.S.-source shipping income if:1. we and each of our vessel-owning subsidiaries are organized in a foreign country (“country of organization”) that grants an “equivalent exemption” tocorporations organized in the United States; and2. either: • more than 50% of the value of our stock is owned, directly or indirectly, for at least half the number of days during the taxable year by(i) individuals who are “residents” of our country of organization or of another foreign country that grants an “equivalent exemption” tocorporations organized in the United States, (ii) non-U.S. corporations that meet the “Publicly Traded Test” discussed below and are organized ina foreign country that grants an “equivalent exemption” to corporations organized in the United States or (iii) certain other qualified personsdescribed in the applicable regulations, which we refer to as the “50% Ownership Test,” or • our stock is “primarily and regularly traded on an established securities market” in our country of organization, in another country that grants an“equivalent exemption” to U.S. corporations, or in the United States, which we refer to as the “Publicly-Traded Test.”Currently, the jurisdiction where we are incorporated, as well as the jurisdictions where our vessel-owning subsidiaries are incorporated, namely, the Republicof the Marshall Islands, the Cayman Islands, Hong Kong and the British Virgin Islands, grant an “equivalent exemption” to U.S. corporations. Therefore, atpresent, we will be exempt from U.S. federal income taxation with respect to our U.S.-source shipping income if we satisfy either the 50% Ownership Test orthe Publicly-Traded Test. Our ability to satisfy the 50% Ownership Test and Publicly-Traded Test is discussed below.The Treasury Regulations provide, in pertinent part, that stock of a foreign corporation will be considered to be “primarily traded” on an establishedsecurities market if the number of shares of each class of stock that are traded during any taxable year on all established securities markets in that countryexceeds the number of shares in each such class that are traded during that year on established securities markets in any other single country. Our commonstock is “primarily traded” on the New York Stock Exchange.Under the Treasury Regulations, our stock is considered to be “regularly traded” on an established securities market if one or more classes of our stockrepresenting more than 50% of our outstanding shares, by total combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote and total value, is listed on themarket during the taxable year, which we refer to as the listing threshold. Since our common stock, which represents more than 50% of our outstanding sharesby vote and value, is listed on the New York Stock Exchange, we currently satisfy the listing requirement.It is further required that with respect to each class of stock relied upon to meet the listing threshold (i) such class of the stock is traded on the market, otherthan de minimis quantities, on at least 60 days during the taxable year or 1/6 of the days in a short taxable year; and (ii) the aggregate number of shares ofsuch class of stock traded on such market during the taxable year is at least 10% of the average number of shares of such class of stock outstanding duringsuch year or as appropriately adjusted in the case of a short taxable year. We currently satisfy the trading frequency and trading volume tests. Even if thiswere not the case, the regulations provide that the trading frequency and trading volume tests will be deemed satisfied by a class of stock if such class ofstock is traded during the taxable year on an established market in the United States and such class of stock is regularly quoted by dealers making a market insuch stock, which condition our common stock meets. 82 Table of ContentsNotwithstanding the foregoing, the Treasury Regulations provide, in pertinent part, that our common stock will not be considered to be “regularly traded” onan established securities market for any taxable year in which 50% or more of the vote and value of the outstanding shares of our common stock are owned,actually or constructively under specified stock attribution rules, on more than half the days during the taxable year by persons who each own 5% or more ofthe vote and value of our common stock, which we refer to as the “5% Override Rule.”For purposes of being able to determine the persons who owns 5% or more of our common stock, or “5% Stockholders,” the Treasury Regulations permit us torely on Schedule 13G and Schedule 13D filings with the SEC to identify persons who have a 5% or more beneficial interest in our common stock. TheTreasury Regulations further provide that an investment company that is registered under the Investment Company Act will not be treated as a 5%Stockholder for such purposes.If our 5% Stockholders did own more than 50% of our common stock, then we would be subject to the 5% Override Rule unless we were able to establish thatamong the closely-held group of 5% Stockholders, there are sufficient 5% Stockholders that are qualified stockholders for purposes of Section 883 topreclude non-qualified 5% Stockholders in the closely-held group from owning 50% or more of the total value of each class of our stock for more than halfthe number of days during the taxable year. In order to establish this, sufficient 5% Stockholders that are qualified stockholders would have to comply withcertain documentation and certification requirements designed to substantiate their identity as qualified stockholders. These requirements are onerous andthere is no guarantee that we would be able to satisfy them in all cases.Currently, Navios Holdings (a Marshall Islands corporation) owns approximately 47.4% of our common stock. Navios Holdings has represented to us that itpresently meets the Publicly Traded Test and has agreed to comply with the documentation and certification requirements described above. Accordingly, weanticipate that we will not be subject to the 5% Override Rule. However, there can be no assurance that Navios Holdings will continue to meet the PubliclyTraded Test or continue to be able to comply with the documentation and certification requirements described above. Consequently, there can be noassurance that we will not be subject to the 5% Override Rule in the future.Taxation in Absence of ExemptionTo the extent the benefits of Section 883 are unavailable, our U.S.-source shipping income, to the extent not considered to be “effectively connected” withthe conduct of a U.S. trade or business, as described below, would be subject to a 4% tax imposed by Section 887 of the Code on a gross basis, without thebenefit of deductions.Since under the sourcing rules described above, no more than 50% of our shipping income would be treated as being derived from U.S. sources, the maximumeffective rate of U.S. federal income tax on our shipping income would never exceed 2% of our gross income under the 4% gross basis tax regime.To the extent the benefits of the Section 883 exemption are unavailable and our U.S.-source shipping income is considered to be “effectively connected”with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business, as described below, any such “effectively connected” U.S.-source shipping income, net of applicable deductions,would be subject to the U.S. federal corporate income tax currently imposed at rates of up to 35%. In addition, we may be subject to the 30% “branch profits”taxes on any earnings and profits effectively connected with the conduct of such trade or business, as determined after allowance for certain adjustments, andon certain interest paid or deemed paid attributable to the conduct of our U.S. trade or business.Our U.S.-source shipping income would be considered “effectively connected” with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business only if: • we have, or are considered to have, a fixed place of business in the United States involved in the earning of shipping income; and • substantially all of our U.S.-source shipping income is attributable to regularly scheduled transportation, such as the operation of a vessel thatfollows a published schedule with repeated sailings at regular intervals between the same points for voyages that begin or end in the UnitedStates.We do not intend to have, or permit circumstances that would result in having any vessel operating to the United States on a regularly scheduled basis. Basedon the foregoing and on the expected mode of our shipping operations and other activities, we believe that none of our U.S.-source shipping income will be“effectively connected” with the conduct of a U.S. trade or business.United States Taxation of Gain on Sale of VesselsRegardless of whether we will qualify for exemption under Section 883, we should not be subject to U.S. federal income taxation with respect to gain realizedon a sale of a vessel, provided that we did not depreciate the vessel for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If we took depreciation deductions with respect tothe vessel for U.S. federal income tax purposes 83 Table of Contents(which would be the case if the vessel had produced effectively connected income), upon the sale of such vessel, a portion of any gain realized on the salewould be sourced to the U.S. in proportion to the depreciation deductions taken in the U.S. compared to the total depreciation of the vessel.United States Federal Income Taxation of U.S. HoldersDistributionsSubject to the discussion of the rules applicable to a passive foreign investment company (“PFIC”) below, any distributions made by us with respect to ourcommon stock to a U.S. Holder will constitute dividends, which will be taxable as ordinary income, to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings andprofits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles. Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits will be treated firstas a nontaxable return of capital to the extent of the U.S. Holder’s tax basis in our common stock on a dollar-for-dollar basis and thereafter as capital gain,which will be either long-term or short-term capital gain depending upon whether the U.S. Holder held the common shares for more than one year. BecauseNavios Acquisition is not a U.S. corporation, U.S. Holders that are corporations will not be entitled to claim a dividends received deduction with respect toany distributions they receive from us. Dividends paid with respect to Navios Acquisition’s common stock will be treated as foreign source income andgenerally will be “passive category income” for purposes of computing allowable foreign tax credits for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes.Dividends received by a non-corporate U.S. Holder are taxed at ordinary income tax rates (currently, a maximum 39.6%) unless such dividends constitute“qualified dividend income.” “Qualified dividend income” generally includes a dividend paid by a foreign corporation if (i) the stock with respect to whichsuch dividend was paid is readily tradable on an established securities market in the U.S., (ii) the foreign corporation is not a PFIC for the taxable year duringwhich the dividend is paid and the immediately preceding taxable year (which we do not believe we have been for 2012, or will be for subsequent years, asdiscussed below), (iii) the non-corporate U.S. Holder has owned the stock for more than 60 days during the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the dateon which the stock become ex-dividend (and has not entered into certain risk limiting transactions with respect to such stock), and (iv) the non-corporate U.S.Holder is not under an obligation to make related payments with respect to positions in substantially similar or related property. Qualified dividend income issubject to the long-term capital gain tax rate, which is currently a maximum of 20%. In addition, a 3.8% tax may apply to certain investment income. See “Medicare Tax ” below. Because the common stock of Navios Acquisition is traded on the NYSE, dividends paid during 2013 to U.S. Holders that are U.S.citizens or individual residents should generally be qualified dividend income subject to the long-term capital gains tax rate.Special rules may apply to any amounts received in respect of our common stock that are treated as “extraordinary dividends.” In general, an extraordinarydividend is a dividend with respect to a share of common stock that is equal to or in excess of 10.0% of a U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis (or fair market valueupon the U.S. Holder’s election) in such share. In addition, extraordinary dividends include dividends received within a one year period that, in theaggregate, equal or exceed 20.0% of a U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis (or fair market value). If we pay an “extraordinary dividend” on our common stock thatis treated as “qualified dividend income,” then any loss recognized by an individual U.S. Holder from the sale or exchange of such common stock will betreated as long-term capital loss to the extent of the amount of such dividend.Sale, Exchange or Other Disposition of Common StockSubject to the discussion of PFICs below, a U.S. Holder generally will recognize capital gain or loss upon a sale, exchange or other disposition of a share ofour common stock in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized by the U.S. Holder from such sale, exchange or other disposition and theU.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in such stock. The U.S. Holder’s initial tax basis in a share of our common stock generally will be the U.S. Holder’s purchaseprice for the share and that tax basis will be reduced (but not below zero) by the amount of any distributions on our common stock that are treated as non-taxable returns of capital (as discussed under “—Distributions” above). Such gain or loss will be treated as long-term capital gain or loss if the U.S. Holder’sholding period is greater than one year at the time of the sale, exchange or other disposition. Such capital gain or loss will generally be treated as U.S.-sourceincome or loss, as applicable, for U.S. foreign tax credit purposes.A corporate U.S. Holder’s capital gains, long-term and short-term, are taxed at ordinary income tax rates. If a corporate U.S. Holder recognizes a loss upon thedisposition of our common stock, the U.S. Holder is limited to using the loss to offset other capital gain. If a corporate U.S. Holder has no other capital gain inthe tax year of the loss, it may carry the capital loss back three years and forward five years.As described above, long-term capital gains of non-corporate U.S. Holders are subject to the current favorable tax rate of 20%. In addition, a 3.8% tax mayapply to certain investment income. See “ Medicare Tax ” below. A non-corporate U.S. 84 Table of ContentsHolder may deduct a capital loss resulting from a disposition of our common stock to the extent of capital gains plus up to $3,000 ($1,500 for marriedindividuals filing separate tax returns) and may carry forward long-term capital losses indefinitely.Passive Foreign Investment Company Status and Significant Tax ConsequencesIn general, we will be treated as a PFIC with respect to a U.S. Holder if, for any taxable year in which such holder held our common stock, either: • at least 75% of our gross income for such taxable year consists of passive income (e.g., dividends, interest, capital gains and rents derived otherthan in the active conduct of a rental business); or • at least 50% of the average value of the assets held by us during such taxable year produce, or are held for the production of, passive income.For purposes of determining whether we are a PFIC, we will be treated as earning and owning our proportionate share of the income and assets, respectively,of any subsidiary corporation in which we own at least 25% of the value of the subsidiary’s stock. Income earned, or deemed earned, by us in connection withthe performance of services will not constitute passive income. By contrast, rental income will constitute “passive income” unless we are treated as derivingour rental income in the active conduct of a trade or business under applicable rules.Based on our current and projected methods of operations, and an opinion of counsel, we believe that we were not a PFIC for the 2012 and 2011 taxable years(we were treated as a PFIC for the 2008 and 2009 taxable years), and we do not believe that we will be a PFIC for 2013 and subsequent taxable years. Forpost-2010 taxable years, our U.S. counsel, Thompson Hine LLP, is of the opinion that (1) the income we receive from the time chartering activities and assetsengaged in generating such income should not be treated as passive income or assets, respectively, and (2) so long as our income from time charters exceeds25.0% of our gross income for each taxable year after our 2010 taxable year and the value of our vessels contracted under time charters exceeds 50.0% of theaverage value of our assets for each taxable year after our 2010 taxable year, we should not be a PFIC for any taxable year after our 2010 taxable year. Thisopinion is based on representations and projections provided to our counsel by us regarding our assets, income and charters, and its validity is conditionedon the accuracy of such representations and projections.Our counsel’s opinion is based principally on their conclusion that, for purposes of determining whether we are a PFIC, the gross income we derive (or aredeemed to derive from any subsidiary in which we own at least 25% by value of the subsidiary’s stock) from time chartering activities should constituteservices income, rather than rental income. Correspondingly, such income should not constitute passive income, and the assets that we own and operate (orthat we are deemed to own and operate through any subsidiary in which we own at least 25% by value of the subsidiary’s stock) in connection with theproduction of such income, in particular, the vessels we own (or we are deemed to own) that are subject to time charters, should not constitute passive assetsfor purposes of determining whether we are or have been a PFIC. We expect that all of the vessels in our fleet will be engaged in time chartering activities andintend to treat our income from those activities as non-passive income, and the vessels engaged in those activities as non-passive assets, for PFIC purposes.Our counsel has advised us that there is a significant amount of legal authority consisting of the Code, legislative history, IRS pronouncements and rulingssupporting our position that the income from our time chartering activities constitutes services income (rather than rental income). There is, however, nodirect legal authority under the PFIC rules addressing whether income from time chartering activities is services income or rental income. Moreover, in a casenot interpreting the PFIC rules, Tidewater Inc. v. United States, 565 F.3d 299 (5th Cir. 2009), the Fifth Circuit held that the vessel time charters at issuegenerated predominantly rental income rather than services income. However, the IRS stated in an Action on Decision (AOD 2010-001) that it disagrees with,and will not acquiesce to, the way that the rental versus services framework was applied to the facts in the Tidewater decision, and in its discussion stated thatthe time charters at issue in Tidewater would be treated as producing services income for PFIC purposes. The IRS’s AOD, however, is an administrative actionthat cannot be relied upon or otherwise cited as precedent by taxpayers.The opinion of our counsel is not binding on the IRS or any court. Thus, while we have received an opinion of our counsel in support of our position, there isa possibility that the IRS or a court could disagree with this position and the opinion of our counsel. In addition, although we intend to conduct our affairs ina manner to avoid being classified as a PFIC with respect to any taxable year, we cannot assure you that the nature of our operations will not change in thefuture.As discussed more fully below, if we were to be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year in which a U.S. Holder owned our common stock, the U.S. Holder wouldbe subject to different taxation rules depending on whether the U.S. Holder makes an election to treat us as a “Qualified Electing Fund,” which we refer to as a“QEF election.” (As previously discussed, we were not a PFIC for the 2011 and 2012 taxable years and we do not believe that we will be treated as a PFIC for2013 and 85 Table of Contentssubsequent taxable years.) As an alternative to making a QEF election, the U.S. Holder should be able to make a “mark-to-market” election with respect to ourcommon stock, as discussed below. In addition, if we were treated as a PFIC for any taxable year in which a U.S. Holder owned our common stock, the U.S.Holder would be required to file IRS Form 8621 for each year in which the U.S. Holder (i) recognizes gain on the actual or deemed disposition of our commonstock, (ii) receives certain actual or deemed distributions from us or (iii) makes any of certain reportable elections (including a QEF election or a mark-to-market election). The U.S. Holder also would be required to file an annual report, with respect to each taxable year beginning on or after March 18, 2010,containing such information as the IRS may require in the revised IRS Form 8621. Until the IRS releases the revised IRS Form 8621, this additional reportingrequirement is suspended (although a U.S. Holder that is currently otherwise required to file IRS Form 8621 ( e.g., upon an actual or deemed disposition ofPFIC stock) must continue to file the current IRS Form 8621). However, following the release of the revised IRS Form 8621, U.S. Holders for which the filingof IRS Form 8621 has been suspended for a taxable year will be required to attach IRS Form 8621 for each suspended taxable year to their next income tax orinformation return required to be filed with the IRS. In the event a U.S. Holder does not file IRS Form 8621, the statute of limitations on the assessment andcollection of U.S. federal income taxes of such U.S. Holder for the related tax year may not close before the date which is three years after the date on whichsuch report is filed.It should also be noted that, if we were treated as a PFIC for any taxable year in which a U.S. Holder owned our common stock and any of our non-U.S.subsidiaries were also a PFIC, the U.S. Holder would be treated as owning a proportionate amount (by value) of the shares of the lower-tier PFIC for purposesof the application of these rules.Taxation of U.S. Holders Making a Timely QEF ElectionIf we were to be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year and a U.S. Holder makes a timely QEF election (any such U.S. Holder, an “Electing Holder”), theElecting Holder must report for U.S. federal income tax purposes its pro rata share of our ordinary earnings and net capital gain, if any, for our taxable yearthat ends with or within the Electing Holder’s taxable year, regardless of whether or not the Electing Holder received any distributions from us in that year.Such income inclusions would not be eligible for the preferential tax rates applicable to “qualified dividend income.” The Electing Holder’s adjusted taxbasis in our common stock will be increased to reflect taxed but undistributed earnings and profits. Distributions to the Electing Holder of our earnings andprofits that were previously taxed will result in a corresponding reduction in the Electing Holder’s adjusted tax basis in our common stock and will not betaxed again once distributed. The Electing Holder would not, however, be entitled to a deduction for its pro rata share of any losses that we incur with respectto any year. An Electing Holder generally will recognize capital gain or loss on the sale, exchange or other disposition of our common stock.Even if a U.S. Holder makes a QEF election for one of our taxable years, if we were a PFIC for a prior taxable year during which the U.S. Holder owned ourcommon stock and for which the U.S. Holder did not make a timely QEF election, the U.S. Holder would also be subject to the more adverse rules describedbelow under “ Taxation of U.S. Holders Not Making a Timely QEF or Mark-to-Market Election.” However, under certain circumstances, a U.S. Holder may bepermitted to make a retroactive QEF election with respect to us for any open taxable years in the U.S. Holder’s holding period for our common stock in whichwe are treated as a PFIC. Additionally, to the extent that any of our subsidiaries is a PFIC, a U.S. Holder’s QEF election with respect to us would not beeffective with respect to the U.S. Holder’s deemed ownership of the stock of such subsidiary and a separate QEF election with respect to such subsidiarywould be required.A U.S. Holder makes a QEF election with respect to any year that we are a PFIC by filing IRS Form 8621 with the U.S. Holder’s U.S. federal income tax return.If, contrary to our expectations, we were to determine that we are treated as a PFIC for any taxable year, we would notify all U.S. Holders and would provideall necessary information to any U.S. Holder that requests such information in order to make the QEF election described above with respect to us and therelevant subsidiaries. A QEF election would not apply to any taxable year for which we are not a PFIC, but would remain in effect with respect to anysubsequent taxable year for which we are a PFIC, unless the IRS consents to the revocation of the election.Taxation of U.S. Holders Making a “Mark-to-Market” ElectionIf we were to be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year and, as we anticipate, our common stock were treated as “marketable stock,” then, as an alternative tomaking a QEF election, a U.S. Holder would be allowed to make a “mark-to-market” election with respect to our common stock, provided the U.S. Holdercompletes and files IRS Form 8621 in accordance with the relevant instructions and related Treasury Regulations. If that election is made, the U.S. Holdergenerally would include as ordinary income in each taxable year the excess, if any, of the fair market value of the U.S. Holder’s common stock at the end ofthe taxable year over the holder’s adjusted tax basis in the common stock. The U.S. Holder also would be permitted an ordinary loss in respect of the excess, ifany, of the U.S. Holder’s adjusted tax basis in the common stock over the fair market value thereof at the end of the taxable year, but only to the extent of thenet amount previously included in income as a result of the mark-to-market election. A U.S. Holder’s tax basis in the U.S. Holder’s common stock would beadjusted to reflect any such income or loss recognized. Gain recognized on the sale, exchange or other disposition of our common stock 86 Table of Contentswould be treated as ordinary income, and any loss recognized on the sale, exchange or other disposition of the common stock would be treated as ordinaryloss to the extent that such loss does not exceed the net mark-to-market gains previously included in income by the U.S. Holder. A mark-to-market electionwould not apply to our common stock owned by a U.S. Holder in any taxable year during which we are not a PFIC, but would remain in effect with respect toany subsequent taxable year for which we are a PFIC, unless our common stock is no longer treated as “marketable stock” or the IRS consents to therevocation of the election.Even if a U.S. Holder makes a “mark-to-market” election for one of our taxable years, if we were a PFIC for a prior taxable year during which the U.S. Holderowned our common stock and for which the U.S. Holder did not make a timely mark-to-market election, the U.S. Holder would also be subject to the moreadverse rules described below under “ Taxation of U.S. Holders Not Making a Timely QEF or Mark-to-Market Election.” Additionally, to the extent that anyof our subsidiaries is a PFIC, a “mark-to-market” election with respect to our common stock would not apply to the U.S. Holder’s deemed ownership of thestock of such subsidiary.Taxation of U.S. Holders Not Making a Timely QEF or Mark-to-Market ElectionIf we were to be treated as a PFIC for any taxable year, a U.S. Holder who does not make either a timely QEF election or a timely “mark-to-market” election forthat year (i.e., the taxable year in which the U.S. Holder’s holding period commences), whom we refer to as a “Non-Electing Holder,” would be subject tospecial rules resulting in increased tax liability with respect to (1) any excess distribution (i.e., the portion of any distributions received by the Non-ElectingHolder on our common stock in a taxable year in excess of 125.0% of the average annual distributions received by the Non-Electing Holder in the threepreceding taxable years, or, if shorter, the Non-Electing Holder’s holding period for the common stock), and (2) any gain realized on the sale, exchange orother disposition of our common stock. Under these special rules: • the excess distribution and any gain would be allocated ratably over the Non-Electing Holder’s aggregate holding period for the common stock; • the amount allocated to the current taxable year and any year prior to the year we were first treated as a PFIC with respect to the Non-ElectingHolder would be taxed as ordinary income; and • the amount allocated to each of the other taxable years would be subject to tax at the highest rate of tax in effect for the applicable class oftaxpayer for that year, and an interest charge for the deemed deferral benefit would be imposed with respect to the resulting tax attributable toeach such other taxable year.Moreover, (i) any dividends received by a non-corporate U.S. Holder in a year in which we are a PFIC (or in which we were a PFIC in the preceding year) willnot be treated as “qualified dividend income” and will be subject to tax at rates applicable to ordinary income and (ii) if a Non-Electing Holder who is anindividual dies while owning our common stock, such holder’s successor generally would not receive a step-up in tax basis with respect to such stock.Additionally, to the extent that any of our subsidiaries is a PFIC, the foregoing consequences would apply to the U.S. Holder’s deemed receipt of any excessdistribution on, or gain deemed realized on the disposition of, the stock of such subsidiary deemed owned by the U.S. Holder.If we are treated as a PFIC for any taxable year during the holding period of a U.S. Holder, unless the U.S. Holder makes a timely QEF election, or atimely “mark-to-market” election, for the first taxable year in which the U.S. Holder holds our common stock and in which we are a PFIC, we willcontinue to be treated as a PFIC for all succeeding years during which the U.S. Holder owns our common stock even if we are not a PFIC for such years.U.S. Holders are encouraged to consult their tax advisers with respect to any available elections that may be applicable in such a situation. In thisregard, while it is our position and our U.S. counsel’s position that we should not be a PFIC for 2011 or 2012 and we believe that we will not be a PFICfor subsequent taxable years, there is no assurance that these positions are correct. In addition, U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisers regardingthe IRS information reporting and filing obligations that may arise as a result of the ownership of shares in a PFIC.Medicare TaxA U.S. Holder that is an individual or estate, or a trust that does not fall into a special class of trusts that is exempt from such tax, will generally be subject to a3.8% tax on the lesser of (i) the U.S. Holder’s “net investment income” for a taxable year and (ii) the excess of the U.S. Holder’s modified adjusted grossincome for such taxable year over $200,000 ($250,000 in the case of joint filers). For these purposes, “net investment income” will generally includedividends paid with respect to our common stock and net gain attributable to the disposition of our common stock (in each case, unless such common stockis held in connection with certain trades or businesses), but will be reduced by any deductions properly allocable to such income or net gain. 87 Table of ContentsUnited States Federal Income Taxation of Non-U.S. HoldersDistributionsA Non-U.S. Holder generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax or withholding tax on distributions received with respect to our common stock ifthe Non-U.S. Holder is not engaged in a U.S. trade or business. If the Non-U.S. Holder is engaged in a U.S. trade or business, our distributions will be subjectto U.S. federal income tax to the extent they constitute income effectively connected with the Non-U.S. Holder’s U.S. trade or business (and a corporate Non-U.S. Holder may also be subject to U.S. federal branch profits tax). However, distributions paid to a Non-U.S. Holder who is engaged in a trade or businessmay be exempt from taxation under an income tax treaty if the income arising from the distribution is not attributable to a U.S. permanent establishmentmaintained by the Non-U.S. Holder.Sale, Exchange or other Disposition of Common StockIn general, a Non-U.S. Holder will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax or withholding tax on any gain resulting from the disposition of our commonstock provided the Non-U.S. Holder is not engaged in a U.S. trade or business. A Non-U.S. Holder that is engaged in a U.S. trade or business will be subject toU.S. federal income tax in the event the gain from the disposition of our common stock is effectively connected with the conduct of such U.S. trade orbusiness (provided, in the case of a Non-U.S. Holder entitled to the benefits of an income tax treaty with the United States, such gain also is attributable to aU.S. permanent establishment). However, even if not engaged in a U.S. trade or business, individual Non-U.S. Holders may be subject to tax on gain resultingfrom the disposition of our common stock if they are present in the United States for 183 days or more during the taxable year of the disposition and meetcertain other requirements.Certain Information Reporting RequirementsIndividual U.S. Holders (and to the extent specified in applicable Treasury Regulations, certain individual Non-U.S. Holders and certain U.S. Holders that areentities) that hold “specified foreign financial assets,” including our common stock, whose aggregate value exceeds $75,000 at any time during the taxableyear or $50,000 on the last day of the taxable year (or such higher amounts as prescribed by applicable Treasury Regulations) are required to file a report onIRS Form 8938 with information relating to the assets for each such taxable year. Specified foreign financial assets would include, among other things, ourcommon stock, unless such common stock is held in an account maintained by a U.S. “financial institution” (as defined). Substantial penalties apply to anyfailure to timely file IRS Form 8938, unless the failure is shown to be due to reasonable cause and not due to willful neglect. Additionally, in the event anindividual U.S. Holder (and to the extent specified in applicable Treasury Regulations, an individual Non-U.S. Holder or a U.S. entity) that is required to fileIRS Form 8938 does not file such form, the statute of limitations on the assessment and collection of U.S. federal income taxes of such holder for the relatedtax year may not close until three years after the date that the required information is filed. U.S. Holders (including U.S. entities) and Non-U.S. Holders shouldconsult their own tax advisors regarding their reporting obligations under this legislation.U.S. Backup Withholding Tax and Related Information Reporting RequirementsIn general, dividend payments and payments of proceeds from the disposition of our common stock made to a non-corporate U.S. Holder may be subject toinformation reporting requirements. Such payments may also be subject to backup withholding tax (currently at a rate of 28%) if you are a non-corporate U.S.Holder and you: • fail to provide an accurate taxpayer identification number; • are notified by the IRS that you are subject to backup withholding because you have previously failed to report all interest or dividends requiredto be shown on your federal income tax returns; or • fail to comply with applicable certification requirements.Non-U.S. Holders may be required to establish their exemption from information reporting and backup withholding by certifying their status on an applicableIRS Form W-8.Backup withholding tax is not an additional tax. Rather, you generally may obtain a credit of any amounts withheld against your liability for U.S. federalincome tax (and obtain a refund of any amounts withheld in excess of such liability) by timely filing a U.S. federal income tax return with the IRS.F. Dividends and paying agentsNot applicable.G. Statements by expertsNot applicable. 88 Table of ContentsH. Documents on displayWe file reports and other information with the SEC. These materials, including this Annual Report and the accompanying exhibits, may be inspected andcopied at the public facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549, or from the SEC’s website http://www.sec.gov. You mayobtain information on the operation of the public reference room by calling 1 (800) SEC-0330 and you may obtain copies at prescribed rates.I. Subsidiary informationNot applicable.Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market RisksForeign Exchange RiskOur functional and reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. We engage in worldwide commerce with a variety of entities. Although our operations may expose usto certain levels of foreign currency risk, our transactions are predominantly U.S. dollar denominated. Transactions in currencies other than U.S. dollar aretranslated at the exchange rate in effect at the date of each transaction. Differences in exchange rates during the period between the date a transactiondenominated in a foreign currency is consummated and the date on which it is either settled or translated, are recognized. Expenses incurred in foreigncurrencies against which the U.S. Dollar falls in value can increase thereby decreasing our income or vice versa if the U.S. dollar increases in value. Forexample, during the year ended December 31, 2012, the value of U.S. dollar increased by approximately 2.0% as compared to the Euro.Interest Rate RiskAs of December 31, 2012, Navios Acquisition had a total of $1,021.1 million in short term and long-term indebtness. The debt is U.S. dollar-denominated.Borrowings under our credit facilities bear interest at rates based on a premium over U.S.$ LIBOR except for the interest rate on the Notes which is fixed.Therefore, we are exposed to the risk that our interest expense may increase if interest rates rise. For the year ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 wepaid interest on our outstanding debt at a weighted average interest rate of 3.25%, 3.16% and 3.27%, respectively. A 1% increase in LIBOR would haveincreased our interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 by $4.9 million, $3.3 million and $1.7 million, respectively.Concentration of Credit RiskFinancial instruments, which potentially subject us to significant concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of trade accounts receivable. We closelymonitor our exposure to customers for credit risk. We have policies in place to ensure that we trade with customers with an appropriate credit history. For theyear ended December 31, 2010, Jacob Tank Chartering GMBH & CO. KG, SK Shipping Company Ltd, DOSCO, Formosa Petrochemical Corporation, BlueLight Chartering Inc and Navig8 Chemicals Shipping and Trading Co accounted for 42.5%, 18.6%, 12.9%, 12.9% and 10.9%, respectively, of NaviosAcquisition’s revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2011, we had three charter counterparties, the most significant of which were DOSCO, KG, BlueLight Chartering Inc. and Jacob Tank Chartering GMBH & Co. and which counterparties accounted for approximately 43.9%, 11.5% and 11.3%,respectively, of our total revenue. For the year ended December 31, 2012, Navios Acquisition’s customers representing 10% or more of total revenue wereDalian Ocean Shipping Co., and STX Panocean Co LTD, which accounted for 43.3% and 10.7%, respectively.Cash and Cash EquivalentCash deposits and cash equivalents in excess of amounts covered by government-provided insurance are exposed to loss in the event of non-performance byfinancial institutions. The Company does maintain cash deposits and equivalents in excess of government-provided insurance limits. The Company alsominimizes exposure to credit risk by dealing with a diversified group of major financial institutions.InflationInflation has had a minimal impact on vessel operating expenses and general and administrative expenses. Our management does not consider inflation to bea significant risk to direct expenses in the current and foreseeable economic environment.Item 12. Description of Securities Other than Equity SecuritiesNot applicable. 89 Table of ContentsPART IIItem 13. Defaults, Dividend Arrearages and DelinquenciesNone.Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Shareholders and Use of ProceedsNone.Item 15. Controls and ProceduresA. Disclosure Controls and ProceduresThe management of Navios Acquisition, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation, pursuantto Rule 13a-15 promulgated under the Securities Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls andprocedures as of December 31, 2012. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controlsand procedures were effective as of December 31, 2012.Disclosure controls and procedures means controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in thereports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rulesand forms and that such information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated andcommunicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriateto allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.B. Management’s annual report on internal control over financial reportingThe management of Navios Acquisition is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined inRule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Navios Acquisition’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding thereliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accountingprinciples in the United States (“GAAP”).Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation ofeffectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliancewith the policies or procedures may deteriorate.Navios Acquisition’s management assessed the effectiveness of Navios Acquisition’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012. Inmaking this assessment, it used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in InternalControl — Integrated Framework. Based on its assessment, management concluded that, as of December 31, 2012, Navios Acquisition’s internal control overfinancial reporting is effective based on those criteria.Navios Acquisition’s independent registered public accounting firm has issued an attestation report on Navios Acquisition’s internal control over financialreporting.C. Attestation report of the registered public accounting firmNavios Acquisition’s independent registered public accounting firm has issued an audit report on Navios Acquisition’s internal control over financialreporting. This report appears on Page F-2 of the consolidated financial statements.D. Changes in internal control over financial reportingThere have been no changes in internal controls over financial reporting (identified in connection with management’s evaluation of such internal controlsover financial reporting) that occurred during the year covered by this Annual Report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, Navios Acquisition’s internal controls over financial reporting.Item 16A. Audit Committee Financial ExpertOur audit committee consists of three independent directors, Messrs. Veraros and Koilalous, and Ms. Noury. Each member of our audit committee isfinancially literate under the current listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange, and our board of directors has determined that Mr. Veraros qualifiesas an “audit committee financial expert,” as such term is defined by the SEC. Mr. Veraros is independent under applicable NYSE and SEC standards. 90 Table of ContentsItem 16B. Code of EthicsWe have adopted a code of conduct and ethics applicable to our directors and officers in accordance with applicable federal securities laws and the rules ofthe New York Stock Exchange. The code is available for review on our website at http://www.navios-acquisition.com.Item 16C. Principal Accountant Fees and ServicesAudit FeesOur principal accountants for the fiscal years 2012 and 2011 were PricewaterhouseCoopers S.A. The audit fees for the audit of each of the years endedDecember 31, 2012 and 2011 were $0.2 million and $0.4 million, respectively.Audit-Related FeesThere were no audit-related fees billed in 2012 and 2011.Tax FeesThere were no tax fees billed in 2012 and 2011.Other FeesThere were no other fees billed in 2012 and 2011.Audit CommitteeThe Audit Committee is responsible for the appointment, replacement, compensation, evaluation and oversight of the work of the independent auditors. Aspart of this responsibility, the audit committee pre-approves the audit and non-audit services performed by the independent auditors in order to assure thatthey do not impair the auditors’ independence from Navios Acquisition. The Audit Committee has adopted a policy which sets forth the procedures and theconditions pursuant to which services proposed to be performed by the independent auditors may be pre-approved.The Audit Committee separately pre-approved all engagements and fees paid to our principal accountants in 2012 and 2011.Item 16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit CommitteesNot applicable.Item 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated PurchasersNone.Item 16F. Change in Registrant’s Certifying AccountantNot applicable.Item 16G. Corporate GovernancePursuant to an exception for foreign private issuers, we are not required to comply with the corporate governance practices followed by U.S. companies underthe New York Stock Exchange listing standards. However, we have voluntarily adopted all of the New York Stock Exchange required practices, except we donot have (i) a compensation committee consisting of independent directors or (ii) a compensation committee charter specifying the purpose andresponsibilities of the compensation committee. Instead, all compensation decisions are currently made by a majority of our independent board members. 91 Table of ContentsItem 16H. Mine Safety DisclosuresNot applicable.Item 17. Financial StatementsSee Item 18.Item 18. Financial StatementsSee index to Financial Statements on page F-1.Item 19. Exhibits ExhibitNo. Description 1.1 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed on June 4, 2010 and herebyincorporated by reference.) 1.2 Articles of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed onFebruary 10, 2011, and hereby incorporated by reference.) 1.3 By-laws (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Navios Acquisition Registration Statement on Form F-1, as amended (File No 333-151707) andhereby incorporated by reference.) 2.1 Specimen Unit Certificate (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Navios Acquisition Registration Statement on Form F-1, as amended (File No333-151707) and hereby incorporated by reference.) 2.2 Specimen Common Stock Certificate (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Navios Acquisition Registration Statement on Form F-1, as amended(File No 333-151707) and hereby incorporated by reference.) 2.3 Specimen Warrant Certificate (Previously filed as an exhibit to the Navios Acquisition Registration Statement on Form F-1, as amended (FileNo 333-151707) and hereby incorporated by reference.) 2.4 Form of Amendment to Warrant Agreement between Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company and Navios Acquisition (Previously filed asan exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed on July 29, 2010, and hereby incorporated by reference.) 2.5 Certificate of Designation of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, as filed with the Registrar of Companies of the Republic of the MarshallIslands on September 16, 2010 (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed on September 21, 2010, and hereby incorporated byreference.) 2.6 Indenture dated October 21, 2010 (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed on October 26, 2010, and hereby incorporatedby reference.) 2.7 Certificate of Designation of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, as filed with the Registrar of Companies of the Republic of the MarshallIslands on October 29, 2010 (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed on November 9, 2010, and hereby incorporated byreference.) 2.8 First Supplemental Indenture dated November 9, 2010 (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed on December 22, 2010, andhereby incorporated by reference.) 2.9 Certificate of Designation of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock, as filed with the Registrar of Companies of the Republic of the MarshallIslands on March 29, 2011 (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed on April 12, 2011, and hereby incorporated byreference.) 92 Table of Contents 2.10 Second Supplemental Indenture dated May 20, 2011 (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed on May 27, 2011, and herebyincorporated by reference.) 2.11 Third Supplemental Indenture dated May 26, 2011 (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed on May 27, 2011, and herebyincorporated by reference.) 2.12 Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated July 1, 2011 (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed on July 22, 2011, and herebyincorporated by reference.) 2.13 Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated December 15, 2011 (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed on January 12, 2012, andhereby incorporated by reference.) 2.14 Certificate of Designation of the Series D Convertible Preferred Stock, as filed with the Registrar of Companies of the Republic of the MarshallIslands on August 24, 2012 (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed on November 16, 2012, and hereby incorporated byreference.) 4.1 Form of Right of First Refusal Agreement among Navios Acquisition, Navios Holdings and Navios Partners (Previously filed as an exhibit to theNavios Acquisition Registration Statement on Form F-1, as amended (File No 333-151707) and hereby incorporated by reference.) 4.2 Repurchase Plan dated April 8, 2010 (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed on April 12, 2010, and hereby incorporated byreference.) 4.3 Amendment to Buyback Agreement dated April 8, 2010 (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed on April 12, 2010, andhereby incorporated by reference.) 4.4 Amended Co-Investment Shares Subscription Agreement dated April 8, 2010 (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed onJune 4, 2010, and hereby incorporated by reference.) 4.5 Acquisition Agreement, dated April 8, 2010 between Navios Acquisition and Navios Holdings (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report onForm 6-K filed on June 4, 2010, and hereby incorporated by reference.) 4.6 Management Agreement dated May 28, 2010 between Navios Acquisition and Navios Ship Management Inc. (Previously filed as an exhibit to aReport on Form 6-K filed on June 4, 2010, and hereby incorporated by reference.) 4.7 Administrative Services Agreement dated May 28, 2010 between Navios Acquisition and Navios Ship Management Inc. (Previously filed as anexhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed on June 4, 2010, and hereby incorporated by reference.) 4.8 Acquisition Omnibus Agreement dated May 28, 2010 among Navios Acquisition, Navios Holdings and Navios Partners (Previously filed as anexhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed on June 4, 2010, and hereby incorporated by reference.) 4.9 Securities Purchase Agreement dated July 18, 2010 between Navios Acquisition and Vanship Holdings Limited (Previously filed as an exhibit to aReport on Form 6-K filed on July 26, 2010, and hereby incorporated by reference.) 4.10 Credit Agreement, dated April 7, 2010, among certain vessel-owning subsidiaries and Deutsche Schiffsbank AG, Alpha Bank A.E. and CreditAgricole Corporate and Investment Bank (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed on June 4, 2010, and hereby incorporatedby reference.) 4.11 Credit Agreement, dated April 8, 2010, among certain vessel-owning subsidiaries and DVB Bank SE and Fortis Bank (Previously filed as anexhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed on June 4, 2010, and hereby incorporated by reference.) 4.12 Form of Revolving Credit Facility with Cyprus Popular Bank Co Ltd (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed on June 4,2010, and hereby incorporated by reference.) 4.13 Facility Agreement for $52 million term loan facility, dated May 28, 2010 Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed on June 4,2010, and hereby incorporated by reference.) 93 Table of Contents 4.14 Facility Agreement for $52.2 million term loan facility, dated October 26, 2010 (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed onNovember 9, 2010, and hereby incorporated by reference.) 4.15 Facility Agreement for $52 million term loan facility, dated December 6, 2010 (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed onJanuary 12, 2012, and hereby incorporated by reference.) 4.16 Registration Rights Agreement dated May 26, 2011 (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed on May 27, 2011, and herebyincorporated by reference.) 4.17 Loan Agreement for $40.0 million with Navios Maritime Holdings Inc., dated September 7, 2010 (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report onForm 6-K filed on May 27, 2011, and hereby incorporated by reference.) 4.18 Letter Agreement Nr. 1 to Loan Agreement, dated as of October 21, 2010 (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed on May 27,2011, and hereby incorporated by reference.) 4.19 Facility Agreement for $55.1 million term loan facility, dated July 8, 2011 (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed onJuly 21, 2011, and hereby incorporated by reference.) 4.20 Letter Agreement Nr. 2 to Loan Agreement, dated November 8, 2011 (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed on November15, 2011, and hereby incorporated by reference.) 4.21 Facility Agreement for $51 million term loan facility, dated December 7, 2011 (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed onDecember 14, 2011, and hereby incorporated by reference.) 4.22 First Supplemental Agreement dated December 20, 2011, to Facility Agreement dated May 28, 2010, for $52 million term loan facility (Previouslyfiled as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed on January 12, 2012, and hereby incorporated by reference.) 4.23 Facility Agreement for up to $28.125 million term loan facility, dated December 29, 2011 (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-Kfiled on February 22, 2012, and hereby incorporated by reference.) 4.24 Facility Agreement for $56.250 million term loan facility, dated December 29, 2011 (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filedon February 22, 2012, and hereby incorporated by reference.) 4.25 Amendment to the Management Agreement dated May 4, 2012 (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed on May 15, 2012, andhereby incorporated by reference.) 4.26 Securities Purchase Agreement, dated February 26, 2013, between Navios Maritime Acquisition Corporation and Navios Maritime Holdings Inc.(Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed on March 4, 2013, and hereby incorporated by reference.) 4.27 Form of Co-Investment Share Purchase Agreement (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed on March 4, 2013, and herebyincorporated by reference.) 4.28 Registration Rights Agreement, dated February 26, 2013, between Navios Maritime Acquisition Corporation and Navios Maritime Holdings Inc.and the management investors party thereto (Previously filed as an exhibit to a Report on Form 6-K filed on March 4, 2013, and herebyincorporated by reference.) 8.1 List of subsidiaries.*12.1 Certification by principal executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *12.2 Certification by principal financial officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. *13.1 Certification by principal executive officer and principal financial officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 15.1 Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers S.A.* *Filed herewith.+Furnished herewith. 94+ Table of ContentsSignaturesNavios Maritime Acquisition Corporation hereby certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and that it has duly caused andauthorized the undersigned to sign this Annual Report on its behalf. Navios Maritime Acquisition Corporation /s/ Angeliki FrangouBy: Angeliki FrangouIts: Chairman and Chief Executive OfficerDate: March 25, 2013 95 Table of ContentsNAVIOS MARITIME ACQUISITION CORPORATION REPORT OF PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS S.A. INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM F-1 CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT DECEMBER 31, 2012 AND 2011 F-2 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR EACH OF THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012, 2011 AND 2010 F-3 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR EACH OF THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012, 2011 AND 2010 F-4 CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY FOR EACH OF THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012, 2011 AND 2010 F-6 NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS F-7 Table of ContentsREPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMTo the Shareholders and Board of Directors ofNavios Maritime Acquisition Corporation:In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in equity, and cash flowspresent fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Navios Maritime Acquisition Corporation and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) atDecember 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2012 inconformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all materialrespects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Frameworkissued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financialstatements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting, included in “Management’s annual report on internal control over financial reporting”, appearing in Item 15(b) of the Company’s 2012 AnnualReport on Form 20-F. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reportingbased on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (UnitedStates). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of materialmisstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statementsincluded examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles usedand significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financialreporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing andevaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures aswe considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reportingand the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal controlover financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairlyreflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permitpreparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are beingmade only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention ortimely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation ofeffectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliancewith the policies or procedures may deteriorate./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers S.A.Athens, GreeceMarch 25, 2013 F-1 Table of ContentsNAVIOS MARITIME ACQUISITION CORPORATIONCONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except share data) Notes December 31,2012 December 31,2011 ASSETS Current assets Cash and cash equivalents 5 $42,846 $41,300 Restricted cash, short term portion 5 21,163 30,640 Accounts receivable, net 6 5,103 6,478 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 2,683 489 Total current assets 71,795 78,907 Vessels, net 7 940,738 774,624 Deposits for vessels acquisitions 7 276,142 245,567 Deferred finance costs, net 8 20,727 24,819 Goodwill 10 1,579 1,579 Intangible assets-other than goodwill 9 51,233 59,879 Restricted cash, long-term portion 5 — 1,574 Other long-term assets 6 897 1,310 Deferred dry dock and special survey costs, net 7,533 7,210 Total non-current assets 1,298,849 1,116,562 Total assets $1,370,644 $1,195,469 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY Current liabilities Accounts payable 11 $1,277 $1,021 Dividend payable 12 2,410 2,421 Accrued expenses 13 12,951 15,492 Due to related parties, short term 17 27,815 43,616 Deferred revenue 3,651 3,251 Current portion of long-term debt 14 19,724 11,928 Total current liabilities 67,828 77,729 Long-term debt, net of current portion and premium 14 974,362 833,483 Loans due to related party 17 35,000 40,000 Due to related parties, long term 17 57,701 — Other long-term liabilities 204 480 Unfavorable lease terms 9 4,245 4,928 Total non-current liabilities 1,071,512 878,891 Total liabilities 1,139,340 956,620 Commitments and contingencies 18 — — Series D Convertible Preferred stock 600 shares issued and outstanding with $6,000 redemption amount 19 6,000 — Stockholders’ equity Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; 4,540 issued and outstanding as of each ofDecember 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 19 — — Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized; 40,517,413 issued and outstanding as ofeach of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 19 4 4 Additional paid-in capital 19 246,102 255,849 Accumulated Deficit (20,802) (17, 004) Total stockholders’ equity 225,304 238, 849 Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $1,370,644 $1,195,469 See notes to consolidated financial statements F-2 Table of ContentsNAVIOS MARITIME ACQUISITION CORPORATIONCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars- except share and per share data) Notes Year endedDecember 31,2012 Year endedDecember 31,2011 Year endedDecember 31,2010 Revenue $151,097 $121,925 $33,568 Time charter expenses (2,824) (3,499) (355) Direct vessel expenses (2,622) (633) — Management fees 17 (47,043) (35,679) (9,752) General and administrative expenses 17 (3,853) (4,241) (1,902) Share based compensation — — (2,140) Transaction costs 4 — — (8,019) Depreciation and amortization 7,9 (49,644) (38,638) (10,120) Prepayment penalties & write-off of deferred finance fees 8 — (935) (5,441) Interest income 445 1,414 862 Interest expenses and finance cost, net 14 (49,432) (43,165) (10,651) Other income/(expense), net 78 (406) 404 Net loss $(3,798) $(3,857) $(13,546) Incremental fair value of securities offered to induce warrants exercise — — (647) Dividend declared on preferred shares Series B (108) (108) — Undistributed loss attributable to Series C participating preferred shares 622 587 — Net loss attributable to common stockholders 21 $(3,284) $(3,378) $(14,193) Net loss per share, basic 21 $(0.08) $(0.08) $(0.43) Weighted average number of shares, basic 40,517,413 41,409,433 32,677,318 Net loss per share, diluted 21 $(0.08) $(0.08) $(0.43)Weighted average number of shares, diluted 40,517,413 41,409,433 32,677,318 See notes to consolidated financial statements F-3 Table of ContentsNAVIOS MARITIME ACQUISITION CORPORATIONCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars) Notes Year endedDecember 31,2012 Year endedDecember 31,2011 Year endedDecember 31,2010 Operating Activities Net loss $(3,798) $(3,857) $(13,546) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 7,9 49,644 38,638 10,120 Amortization and write-off of deferred finance cost, net 8 2,820 3,188 3,456 Amortization of dry dock and special survey costs 2,622 633 — Non-cash transaction costs 19 — — 5,619 Share based compensation 17 — — 2,140 Changes in operating assets and liabilities: (Increase)/decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets (2,194) (1,369) 3,188 Decrease/(increase) in accounts receivable 1,375 (1,999) (4,479) Decrease/(increase) in restricted cash 320 (451) (288) Decrease/(increase) in other long term assets 413 (1,310) — Increase/(decrease) in accounts payable 256 (2,433) 3,398 (Decrease)/increase in accrued expenses (2,541) 6,273 (4,022) Payments for dry dock and special survey costs (2,944) (7,843) — Increase in due to related parties 35,780 33,797 4,390 Increase in deferred revenue 400 486 324 (Decrease)/increase in other long term liabilities (276) 480 — Net cash provided by operating activities $81,877 $64,233 $10,300 Investing Activities Cash paid for assets acquired, net of cash assumed 3 — — (76,428) Cash paid for business acquisition, net of cash assumed 4 — — (102,038) Acquisition of vessels 7 (83,253) (140,704) (89,121) Deposits for vessel acquisitions 7 (142,119) (78,495) (89,843) Decrease in restricted cash 19,416 3,769 2,335 Acquisition of intangible assets other than goodwill 7 — (10,347) — Release from trust account — — 251,493 Net cash used in investing activities $(205,956) $(225,777) $(103,602) Financing Activities Loan proceeds, net of deferred finance costs and net of premium 8,14 162,813 252,075 556,671 Loan proceeds from related party, net of deferred finance cost 5,000 33,209 39,600 Deferred underwriter’s fee 3 — — (8,855) Loan repayment to related party (10,000) (6,000) (27,609) Loan repayments 14 (13,744) (126,277) (412,245) Net proceeds from warrant exercise 19 — — 74,978 Conversion of common stock into cash, upon redemption of common stock 3 — — (99,312) Dividend paid 12 (9,759) (9,790) — Increase in restricted cash (8,685) (1,733) (250) Net proceeds from equity offering 19 — — 33,402 Issuance costs for preferred shares 19 — — (1,805) Net cash provided by financing activities $125,625 $141,484 $154,575 Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 1,546 (20,060) 61,273 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year 41,300 61,360 87 Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $42,846 $41,300 $61,360 F-4 Table of ContentsSupplemental disclosures of cash flow information Cash interest paid, net of capitalized interest $47,102 $40,672 $2,933 Non — cash investing activities Common stock issued for VLCC acquisition — $— $10,745 Preferred stock issued for VLCC transaction costs — $— $5,619 Preferred stock issued for vessel deposits — $— $1,649 Capitalized financing costs 879 $766 $320 Due to related parties — $— $480 Release from escrow — $1,232 $— Non-cash financing activities Dividends payable 2,410 $2,421 $2,421 Acquisition of vessels 4,313 $2,488 $789 Deposits for vessel acquisition 1,848 $1,210 $390 Issuance of Series D Convertible Preferred Stock issued for vessel acquisitions 6,000 $— $— Initial acquisition of 13 vessels (see note 3) Restricted cash $— $— $35,596 Deposits for vessel acquisitions — — 174,411 Purchase options — — 3,158 Debt assumed — — (132,987) Long term liabilities — — (3,158) Accrued expenses — — (112) Total $— $— $76,908 Cash paid, net of cash received of $57 — — 76,428 Payable to Navios Holdings — — 480 Total $— $— $76,908 VLCC Acquisition (see note 4) Purchase price: Cash consideration $— $— $134,270 Equity issuance — — 9,513 Total purchase price $— $— $143,783 Fair value of assets and liabilities acquired: Vessels $— $— $419,500 Deposits for vessel acquisition — — 62,575 Favorable lease terms — — 57,070 Current Assets including cash of $32,232 — — 35,716 Current liabilities — — (16,387) Long-term debt assumed (including current portion) — — (410,451) Unfavorable lease terms — — (5,819) Fair Value of net assets acquired $— $— $142,204 Goodwill $— $— $1,579 See notes to consolidated financial statements F-5 Table of ContentsNAVIOS MARITIME ACQUISITION CORPORATIONCONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY(Expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except share data) Preferred Stock Common Stock Note NumberofPreferredShares Amount Number ofCommonUnits/Shares Amount AdditionalPaid-inCapital (Accumulateddeficit)/Retainedearnings TotalStockholders’Equity Balance, December 31, 2009 — $— 31,625,000 $3 $141,588 $399 $141,990 Common stock redeemed — — (10,021,399) (1) — — (1) Common stock not redeemed — — — — 978 — 978 Directors compensation (290,000 units) — — — — 2,140 — 2,140 Shares Issued from Warrant Tender Program, net — — 18,412,053 2 74,976 — 74,978 Shares issued in business acquisition 4 — — 1,894,918 — 10,745 — 10,745 Preferred Shares issued, net of expenses 19 3,540 — — — 5,463 — 5,463 Equity offering, net of offering expenses 19 — — 6,500,000 1 33,401 — 33,402 Dividend declared/paid — — — — (2,421) — (2,421) Net loss — — — — — (13,546) (13,546) Balance, December 31, 2010 3,540 $— 48,410,572 $5 $266,870 $(13,147 ) $253,728 Common stock exchanged for 1,000 Series C PreferredShares 19 1,000 — (7,676,000) (1) 1 — — Shares reimbursed from escrow in settlement of claim 4 — — (217,159) — (1,232) — (1,232) Dividend declared/paid — — — — (9,790) — (9,790) Net loss — — — — — (3,857) (3,857) Balance, December 31, 2011 4,540 $— 40,517,413 $4 $255,849 $(17,004) $238,849 Dividends paid/declared 12 — — — — (9,747) — (9,747) Net loss — — — — — (3,798) (3,798) Balance, December 31, 2012 4,540 $— 40,517,413 $4 $246,102 $(20,802) $225,304 See notes to consolidated financial statements F-6 Table of ContentsNAVIOS MARITIME ACQUISITION CORPORATIONNOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except share and per share data)NOTE 1: DESCRIPTION OF ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS OPERATIONSNavios Maritime Acquisition Corporation (“Navios Acquisition” or the “Company”) (NYSE: NNA) owns a large fleet of modern crude oil, refined petroleumproduct and chemical tankers providing world-wide marine transportation services. The Company’s strategy is to charter its vessels to international oilcompanies, refiners and large vessel operators under long, medium and short-term charters. The Company is committed to providing quality transportationservices and developing and maintaining long-term relationships with its customers. The operations of Navios Acquisition are managed by Navios TankersManagement Inc. (the “Manager”), a subsidiary of Navios Maritime Holdings Inc. (“Navios Holdings”) from its head offices in Piraeus, Greece.Navios Acquisition was incorporated in the Republic of Marshall Islands on March 14, 2008. On July 1, 2008, Navios Acquisition completed its initialpublic offering, or its IPO. On May 28, 2010, Navios Acquisition consummated the vessel acquisition, which constituted its initial business combination (seenote 3). Following such transaction, Navios Acquisition commenced its operations as an operating company and was controlled by Navios Holdings.On March 30, 2011, Navios Holdings exchanged 7,676,000 shares of Navios Acquisition’s common stock it held for 1,000 shares of Series C ConvertiblePreferred Stock of Navios Acquisition pursuant to an Exchange Agreement entered into on March 30, 2011, between Navios Acquisition and NaviosHoldings. Following this exchange, Navios Holdings currently has 45% of the voting power and 53.7% of the economic interest in Navios Acquisition.As of December 31, 2012, Navios Acquisition had outstanding: 40,517,413 shares of common stock, 4,540 shares of preferred stock and 600 shares ofconvertible preferred stock, 6,037,994 public warrants. Included in the number of shares and warrants are 12,752 units (one unit consists of one share ofcommon stock and one warrant).NOTE 2: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES(a) Basis of presentation: The accompanying consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted inthe United States of America (GAAP).Navios Acquisition has revised its consolidated statement of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 to appropriately reflect certainamounts related to acquisitions of vessels and deposits of vessel acquisitions during 2011 and 2010 that were not paid as at December 31, 2011 and 2010.This revision resulted in a total of $3,739 and $1,179 decrease in net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010respectively and a corresponding decrease in the change in due to related parties resulting in a decrease in net cash provided by operating activities. TheCompany also revised the supplemental disclosure of noncash acquisition of vessels and deposits for vessel acquisition by an increase of $2,529 and $1,210respectively for 2011 and an increase of $789 and $390 respectively for 2010. The Company determined that such revisions are not material to consolidatedfinancial statements.There was no impact on previously reported total cash and cash equivalents, consolidated balance sheets or consolidated statements of operations.(b) Principles of consolidation: The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Navios Acquisition, a Marshall Islandscorporation, and its majority owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidatedstatements.The Company also consolidates entities that are determined to be variable interest entities as defined in the accounting guidance, if it determines that it is theprimary beneficiary. A variable interest entity is defined as a legal entity where either (a) equity interest holders as a group lack the characteristics of acontrolling financial interest, including decision making ability and an interest in the entity’s residual risks and rewards, or (b) the equity holders have notprovided sufficient equity investment to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support, or (c) the voting rightsof some investors are not proportional to their obligations to absorb the expected losses of the entity, their rights to receive the expected residual returns ofthe entity, or both and substantially all of the entity’s activities either involve or are conducted on behalf of an investor that has disproportionately fewvoting rights.(c) Subsidiaries: Subsidiaries are those entities in which the Company has an interest of more than one half of the voting rights and/or otherwise has power togovern the financial and operating policies. The acquisition method of accounting is used to account for the acquisition of subsidiaries if deemed to be abusiness combination. The cost of an acquisition is measured as the fair value of the assets given up, shares issued or liabilities undertaken at the date ofacquisition. The excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill. F-7 Table of ContentsNAVIOS MARITIME ACQUISITION CORPORATIONNOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except share and per share data) As of December 31, 2012, Navios Acquisition’s subsidiaries included in these consolidated financial statements are: Navios Maritime Acquisition Corporation Nature Country of Statement of operationsand Subsidiaries: Incorporation 2012 2011 2010Company Name Aegean Sea Maritime Holdings Inc. Sub-Holding Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Amorgos Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Andros Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Antikithira Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 6/7 - 12/31 —Antiparos Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Amindra Shipping Co. Sub-Holding Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 4/28 - 12/31 —Crete Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 -12/31Folegandros Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 10/26 - 12/31Ikaria Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Ios Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Cayman Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Kithira Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 6/7 - 12/31 —Kos Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Mytilene Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Navios Maritime Acquisition Corporation Holding Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31Navios Acquisition Finance (U.S.) Inc. Co-Issuer Delaware 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 10/05 - 12/31Rhodes Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Serifos Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 10/26 - 12/31Shinyo Dream Limited Vessel Owning Company Hong Kong 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 9/10 - 12/31Shinyo Kannika Limited Vessel Owning Company Hong Kong 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 9/10 - 12/31Shinyo Kieran Limited Vessel Owning Company British Virgin Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 9/10 - 12/31Shinyo Loyalty Limited Vessel Owning Company Hong Kong 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 9/10 - 12/31Shinyo Navigator Limited Vessel Owning Company Hong Kong 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 9/10 - 12/31Shinyo Ocean Limited Vessel Owning Company Hong Kong 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 9/10 - 12/31Shinyo Saowalak Limited Vessel Owning Company British Virgin Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 9/10 - 12/31Sifnos Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Skiathos Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Skopelos Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Cayman Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Syros Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Thera Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Tinos Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 1/1 - 12/31 5/28 - 12/31Oinousses Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 10/5 - 12/31 —Psara Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 10/5 - 12/31 —Antipsara Shipping Corporation Vessel Owning Company Marshall Is. 1/1 - 12/31 10/5 - 12/31 — (1)Each company has the rights over a shipbuilding contract of a tanker vessel.(d) Use of estimates: The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates andassumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the dates of the financialstatements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. On an on-going basis, management evaluates the estimates andjudgments, including those related to uncompleted voyages, future drydock dates, the selection of useful lives for tangible assets, expected future cash flowsfrom long-lived assets to support impairment tests, provisions necessary for accounts receivables, provisions for legal disputes and contingencies.Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under thecircumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent fromother sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates under different assumptions and/or conditions.(e) Cash and Cash equivalents: Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash on hand, deposits held on call with banks, and other short-term liquid investmentswith original maturities of three months or less.(f) Restricted Cash: Restricted cash consists of cash totaling $10,075 and $29,491 as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, restricted to pay futureinstallments for vessel deposits in accordance with Navios Acquisition’s new build program. Also in restricted cash is an amount of $11,088 for 2012 and$2,723 for 2011 held in retention account in order to service debt, interest payments and pledged cash, as required by certain of Navios Acquisition’s creditfacilities.(g) Accounts Receivable, net: The amount shown as accounts receivable, net at each balance sheet date includes receivables from charterers for hire, freightand demurrage billings, net of a provision for doubtful accounts. At each balance sheet date, all potentially uncollectible accounts are assessed individuallyfor purposes of determining the appropriate provision for doubtful accounts.(h) Vessels, net: Vessels are stated at historical cost, which consists of the contract price, delivery and acquisition expenses and capitalized interest costswhile under construction. Vessels acquired in an asset acquisition or in a business combination are recorded at fair value. Subsequent expenditures for majorimprovements and upgrading are capitalized, provided they appreciably extend the life, increase the earning capacity or improve the efficiency or safety ofthe vessels. Expenditures for routine maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. F-8(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1) Table of ContentsNAVIOS MARITIME ACQUISITION CORPORATIONNOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except share and per share data) Depreciation is computed using the straight line method over the useful life of the vessels, after considering the estimated residual value. Managementestimates the residual values of its tanker vessels based on a scrap value of $285 per lightweight ton, as it believes this level is reasonable and common in theshipping industry. Management estimates the useful life of our vessels to be 25 years from the vessel’s original construction. However, when regulationsplace limitations over the ability of a vessel to trade on a worldwide basis, its useful life is re-estimated to end at the date such regulations become effective.(i) Deposits for vessels acquisitions: This represents amounts paid by the Company in accordance with the terms of the purchase agreements for theconstruction of long-lived fixed assets. Interest costs incurred during the construction (until the asset is substantially complete and ready for its intended use)are capitalized. Capitalized interest included in deposits for the acquisition of vessels amounted to $14,240 and $11,449 for the year, ended December 31,2012 and 2011, respectively.(j) Impairment of long-lived assets: Vessels, other fixed assets and other long lived assets held and used by Navios Acquisition are reviewed periodically forpotential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a particular asset may not be fully recoverable.Navios Acquisition’s management evaluates the carrying amounts and periods over which long-lived assets are depreciated to determine if events or changesin circumstances have occurred that would require modification to their carrying values or useful lives. In evaluating useful lives and carrying values of long-lived assets, certain indicators of potential impairment, are reviewed such as undiscounted projected operating cash flows, vessel sales and purchases,business plans and overall market conditions.Undiscounted projected net operating cash flows are determined for each asset group (consisting of the individual vessel and the intangible with respect tothe time charter agreement to that vessel) and compared to the vessel carrying value and related carrying value of the intangible with respect to the timecharter agreement attached to that vessel or the carrying value of deposits for new buildings. Within the shipping industry, vessels are customarily boughtand sold with a charter attached. The value of the charter may be favorable or unfavorable when comparing the charter rate to then current market rates. Theloss recognized either on impairment (or on disposition) will reflect the excess of carrying value over fair value (selling price) for the vessel individual assetgroup.During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012, management concluded that events occurred and circumstances had changed, which indicated the potentialimpairment of Navios Acquisition’s long-lived assets may exist. These indicators included continued deterioration in the spot market, and the related, impactof the current tanker sector has on management’s expectation for future revenues. As a result, an impairment assessment of long-lived assets or identified assetgroups was performed.The Company determined undiscounted projected net operating cash flows for each vessel and deposits for new buildings and compared it to the vessel’scarrying value together with the carrying value of the related intangible. The significant factors and assumptions used in the undiscounted projected netoperating cash flow analysis included: determining the projected net operating cash flows by considering the charter revenues from existing time charters forthe fixed fleet days (Company’s remaining charter agreement rates) and an estimated daily time charter equivalent for the unfixed days (based on the 10-yearaverage historical one year time charter rates) over the remaining economic life of each vessel, net of brokerage and address commissions, excluding days ofscheduled off-hires, management fees fixed until May 2014 and thereafter assuming an annual increase of 3.0% and utilization rate of 98.6% based on thefleets historical performance.For the deposits for new build vessels, the net cash flows also included the future cash out flows to make the vessels ready for use, all remaining progresspayments to shipyards and other pre-delivery expenses (e.g. capitalized interest). The assessment concluded that step two of the impairment analysis was notrequired and no impairment of vessels, deposits for vessel acquisitions and related intangible assets existed as of December 31, 2012, as the undiscountedprojected net operating cash flows exceeded the carrying value.In the event that impairment would occur, the fair value of the related asset would be determined and a charge would be recorded to operations calculated bycomparing the asset’s carrying value to its fair value. Fair value is estimated primarily through the use of third-party valuations performed on an individualvessel basis.Although management believes the underlying assumptions supporting this assessment are reasonable, if charter rate trends and the length of the currentmarket downturn vary significantly from our forecasts, management may be required to perform step two of the impairment analysis in the future that couldexpose Navios Acquisition to material impairment charges in the future.No impairment loss was recognized for any of the periods presented.(k) Deferred Financing Costs: Deferred financing costs include fees, commissions and legal expenses associated with obtaining loan facilities. These costsare amortized over the life of the related debt using the effective interest rate method, and are included in interest expense. Amortization of deferred financingcost and write-offs for each of the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 were $2,820, $3,188 and $3,456, respectively.(l) Goodwill: Goodwill acquired in a business combination is not to be amortized. Goodwill is tested for impairment at the reporting unit level at leastannually and written down with a charge to operations if the carrying amount exceeds the estimated implied fair value.The Company will evaluate impairment of goodwill using a two-step process. First, the aggregate fair value of the reporting unit is compared to its carryingamount, including goodwill. The Company determines the fair value of the reporting unit based on a combination of discounted cash flow analysis and anindustry market multiple. F-9 Table of ContentsNAVIOS MARITIME ACQUISITION CORPORATIONNOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except share and per share data) If the fair value exceeds the carrying amount, no impairment exists. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds the fair value, then the Companymust perform the second step in order to determine the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill and compare it with its carrying amount. Theimplied fair value of goodwill is determined by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit to all the assets and liabilities of that unit, as if the unit had beenacquired in a business combination and the fair value of the unit was the purchase price. If the carrying amount of the goodwill exceeds the implied fairvalue, then goodwill impairment is recognized by writing the goodwill down to its implied fair value.Navios Acquisition has one reporting unit. No impairment loss was recognized for any of the periods presented.(m) Intangibles other than goodwill: Navios Acquisition’s intangible assets and liabilities consist of favorable lease terms and unfavorable lease terms. Whenintangible assets or liabilities associated with the acquisition of a vessel are identified, they are recorded at fair value. Fair value is determined by reference tomarket data and the discounted amount of expected future cash flows. Where charter rates are higher than market charter rates, an asset is recorded, being thedifference between the acquired charter rate and the market charter rate for an equivalent vessel. Where charter rates are less than market charter rates, aliability is recorded, being the difference between the assumed charter rate and the market charter rate for an equivalent vessel. The determination of the fairvalue of acquired assets and assumed liabilities requires us to make significant assumptions and estimates of many variables including market charter rates,expected future charter rates, the level of utilization of its vessels and its weighted average cost of capital. The use of different assumptions could result in amaterial change in the fair value of these items, which could have a material impact on Navios Acquisition’s financial position and results of operations.The amortizable value of favorable and unfavorable leases is amortized over the remaining life of the lease term and the amortization expense is included inthe statement of operations in the depreciation and amortization line item. The amortizable value of favorable leases would be considered impaired if theirfair market values could not be recovered from the future undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset. Vessel purchase options that have not beenexercised, which are included in favorable lease terms, are not amortized and would be considered impaired if the carrying value of an option, when added tothe option price of the vessel, exceeded the fair value of the vessel. If the purchase option is exercised the portion of this asset will be capitalized as part ofthe cost of the vessel and will be depreciated over the remaining useful life of the vessel.Management, after considering various indicators performed impairment tests on asset groups which included intangible assets as described in paragraph(j) above. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, there was no impairment of intangible assets.(n) Preferred shares Series D: On each of August 31, 2012 and October 31, 2012 Navios Acquisition issued 300 shares (600 in the aggregate) of itsauthorized Series D Preferred Stock (nominal and fair value $6,000) to a shipyard, in partial settlement of the purchase price of the two newbuild LR1 producttankers, the Nave Cassiopeia and the Nave Cetus. The preferred stock contains a 6% per annum dividend payable quarterly, starting one year after delivery ofeach vessel. The Series D Preferred Stock will mandatorily convert into shares of common stock 30 months after the issuance, at a price per share of commonstock equal to $10.00. The holder of the preferred stock shall have the right to convert the shares of preferred stock into common stock prior to the scheduledmaturity date at a price of $7.00 per share of common stock. The preferred stock does not have any voting rights. Navios Acquisition is obligated to redeemthe Series D Preferred Stock (or converted common shares), at the holder’s option exercisable beginning 18 months after the issuance, at par payable at up to12 equal quarterly installments. The Series D Preferred Stock is classified outside of permanent equity as “Series D Convertible Preferred Stock” as theseshares are contractually redeemable for cash at the option of the holder.(o) Deferred Drydock and Special Survey Costs: Navios Acquisition’s vessels are subject to regularly scheduled drydocking and special surveys which arecarried out every 30 or 60 months to coincide with the renewal of the related certificates issued by the classification societies, unless a further extension isobtained in rare cases and under certain conditions. The costs of drydocking and special surveys is deferred and amortized over the above periods or to thenext drydocking or special survey date if such has been determined. Unamortized drydocking or special survey costs of vessels sold are written off to incomein the year the vessel is sold.Costs capitalized as part of the drydocking or special survey consist principally of the actual costs incurred at the yard, spare parts, paints, lubricants andservices incurred solely during the drydocking or special survey period. For each of the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, the amortizationexpense was $2,622, $633 and $0, respectively. Accumulated amortization as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 amounted to$ 3,255 and $633, respectively.(p) Foreign currency translation: Navios Acquisition’s functional and reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. Navios Acquisition engages in worldwidecommerce with a variety of entities. Although, its operations may expose it to certain levels of foreign currency risk, its transactions are predominantly U.S.dollar denominated. Additionally, Navios Acquisition’s wholly owned vessel subsidiaries transacted a nominal amount of their operations in Euros; however,all of the subsidiaries’ primary cash flows are U.S. dollar-denominated. Transactions in currencies other than the functional currency are translated at theexchange rate in effect at the date of each transaction. Differences in exchange rates during the period between the date a transaction denominated in aforeign currency is consummated and the date on which it is either settled or translated, are recognized in the statement of operations.(q) Provisions: Navios Acquisition, in the ordinary course of its business, is subject to various claims, suits and complaints. Management, in consultationwith internal and external advisors, will provide for a contingent loss in the financial statements if the F-10 Table of ContentsNAVIOS MARITIME ACQUISITION CORPORATIONNOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except share and per share data) contingency had been incurred at the date of the financial statements and the amount of the loss was probable and can be reasonably estimated. If NaviosAcquisition has determined that the reasonable estimate of the loss is a range and there is no best estimate within the range, Navios Acquisition will providethe lower amount of the range. Navios Acquisition, through the Management Agreement with the Manager, participates in Protection and Indemnity (P&I)insurance coverage plans provided by mutual insurance societies known as P&I clubs. Services such as the ones described above are provided by theManager under the management agreement dated May 28, 2010, and included as part of the daily fee of $6.0 for each MR2 Product tanker and chemicaltanker vessel, $7.0 per owned LR1 product tanker vessel and $10.0 per owned VLCC vessel.(r) Segment Reporting: Navios Acquisition reports financial information and evaluates its operations by charter revenues and not by the length of shipemployment for its customers. Navios Acquisition does not use discrete financial information to evaluate operating results for each type of charter.Management does not identify expenses, profitability or other financial information by charter type. As a result, management reviews operating results solelyby revenue per day and operating results of the fleet and thus Navios Acquisition has determined that it operates under one reportable segment.(s) Revenue and Expense Recognition:Revenue Recognition: Revenue is recorded when services are rendered, under a signed charter agreement or other evidence of an arrangement, the price isfixed or determinable, and collection is reasonably assured. Revenue is generated from the voyage charter and the time charter of vessels.Voyage revenues for the transportation of cargo are recognized ratably over the estimated relative transit time of each voyage. Voyage expenses arerecognized as incurred. A voyage is deemed to commence when a vessel is available for loading and is deemed to end upon the completion of the dischargeof the current cargo. Estimated losses on voyages are provided for in full at the time such losses become evident. Under a voyage charter, a vessel is providedfor the transportation of specific goods between specific ports in return for payment of an agreed upon freight per ton of cargo.Revenues from time chartering of vessels are accounted for as operating leases and are thus recognized on a straight-line basis as the average revenue over therental periods of such charter agreements, as service is performed. A time charter involves placing a vessel at the charterers’ disposal for a period of timeduring which the charterer uses the vessel in return for the payment of a specified daily hire rate. Under time charters, operating costs such as for crews,maintenance and insurance are typically paid by the owner of the vessel.Profit-sharing revenues are calculated at an agreed percentage of the excess of the charterer’s average daily income (calculated on a quarterly or half-yearlybasis) over an agreed amount and accounted for on an accrual basis based on provisional amounts and for those contracts that provisional accruals cannot bemade due to the nature of the profit share elements, these are accounted for on the actual cash settlement.Revenues are recorded net of address commissions. Address commissions represent a discount provided directly to the charterers based on a fixed percentageof the agreed upon charter or freight rate. Since address commissions represent a discount (sales incentive) on services rendered by the Company and noidentifiable benefit is received in exchange for the consideration provided to the charterer, these commissions are presented as a reduction of revenue.Time Charter and Voyage Expenses: Time charter and voyage expenses comprise all expenses related to each particular voyage, including time charter hirepaid and bunkers, port charges, canal tolls, cargo handling, agency fees and brokerage commissions. Time charter expenses are expensed over the period ofthe time charter and voyage expenses are recognized as incurred.Direct Vessel Expense: Direct vessel expenses are provided to Navios Acquisition by the Manager through the management agreement discussed in theparagraph below. Direct vessel expenses consist of all expenses relating to the operation of vessels, including crewing, repairs and maintenance, insurance,stores and lubricants and miscellaneous expenses such as communications and amortization of drydock and special survey costs.Management fees: Pursuant to a Management Agreement dated May 28, 2010, the Manager provides, for five years from the closing of the Company’s initialvessel acquisition, commercial and technical management services to Navios Acquisition’s vessels for a daily fee of $6.0 per owned MR2 product tanker andchemical tanker vessel, $7.0 per owned LR1 product tanker vessel, and $10.0 per owned VLCC vessel for the first two years. On May 4, 2012, NaviosAcquisition amended its existing Management Agreement with the Manager, to fix the fees for ship management services of its owned fleet at current rates fortwo additional years, through May 28, 2014. This daily fee covers all of the vessels’ operating expenses, other than certain extraordinary fees and costs.During the remaining one year of the term of the Management Agreement, Navios Acquisition expects it will reimburse Navios Holdings for all of the actualoperating costs and expenses it incurs in connection with the management of its fleet. Actual operating costs and expenses will be determined in a mannerconsistent with how the initial fixed fees were determined. Drydocking expenses are fixed under this agreement for up to $300 per vessel, for chemical tanker,MR2 and LR1 product tankers, and will be reimbursed at cost for VLCC vessels. Commencing as of March 30, 2012, Navios Acquisition can, upon request tothe Manager, partially or fully defer the reimbursement of drydocking and other extraordinary fees and expenses under the Agreement to a later date, but notlater than January 4, 2014, and if reimbursed on a later date, such amounts will bear interest at a rate of 1% per annum over LIBOR. Commencing as ofSeptember 28, 2012, Navios Acquisition could, upon request, reimburse the Manager partially or fully, for any fixed management fees outstanding for aperiod of not more than nine months under the Agreement at a later date, but not later than December 31, 2014, and if reimbursed on a later date, suchamounts will bear interest at a rate of 1% per annum over LIBOR. F-11 Table of ContentsNAVIOS MARITIME ACQUISITION CORPORATIONNOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except share and per share data) General and administrative expenses: On May 28, 2010, Navios Acquisition entered into an administrative services agreement with Navios Holdings,expiring on May 28, 2015, pursuant to which a subsidiary of Navios Holdings provides certain administrative management services to Navios Acquisitionwhich include: rent, bookkeeping, audit and accounting services, legal and insurance services, administrative and clerical services, banking and financialservices, advisory services, client and investor relations and other. Navios Holdings is reimbursed for reasonable costs and expenses incurred in connectionwith the provision of these services.Deferred Revenue: Deferred revenue primarily relates to cash received from charterers prior to it being earned. These amounts are recognized as revenue overthe voyage or charter period.Prepaid Expense: Prepaid expenses relate primarily to cash paid in advance for expenses associated with voyages. These amounts are recognized as expenseover the voyage or charter period.(t) Financial Instruments: Financial instruments carried on the balance sheet include trade receivables and payables, other receivables and other liabilitiesand long-term debt. The particular recognition methods applicable to each class of financial instrument are disclosed in the applicable significant policydescription of each item, or included below as applicable.Financial risk management: Navios Acquisition’s activities expose it to a variety of financial risks including fluctuations in future freight rates, time charterhire rates, and fuel prices, credit and interest rate risk. Risk management is carried out under policies approved by executive management. Guidelines areestablished for overall risk management, as well as specific areas of operations.Credit risk: Navios Acquisition closely monitors its exposure to customers and counterparties for credit risk. Navios Acquisition has entered into theManagement Agreement with the Manager, pursuant to which the Manager agreed to provide commercial and technical management services to NaviosAcquisition. When negotiating on behalf of Navios Acquisition various employment contracts, the Manager has policies in place to ensure that it trades withcustomers and counterparties with an appropriate credit history.For the year ended December 31, 2012, Navios Acquisition’s customers representing 10% or more of total revenue were Dalian Ocean Shipping Co., and STXPanocean Co LTD, which accounted for 43.3% and 10.7%, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2011, Navios Acquisition’s customers representing10% or more of total revenue were, Dalian Ocean Shipping Co., Blue light Chartering Inc and Jacob Tank Chartering GMBH &CO. KG., which accounted for43.9%, 11.5% and 11.3%, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2010, Jacob Tank Chartering GMBH & CO. KG, SK Shipping Company Ltd,DOSCO, Formosa Petrochemical Corporation, Blue Light Chartering Inc and Navig8 Chemicals Shipping and Trading Co. accounted for 42.5%, 18.6%,12.9%, 12.9% and 10.9%, respectively, of Navios Acquisition’s revenue. No other customers accounted for 10% or more of total revenue for any of the yearspresented.Foreign exchange risk: Foreign currency transactions are translated into the measurement currency rates prevailing at the dates of transactions. Foreignexchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation of monetary assets and liabilities denominated inforeign currencies are recognized in the consolidated statement of operations.(u) (Loss)/ Earnings per Share: Basic (loss)/ earnings per share is computed by dividing net (loss)/income attributable to Navios Acquisition’s commonshareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the periods presented. Diluted earnings per share reflect the potentialdilution that would occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised. Dilution has been computed by the treasury stock methodwhereby all of the Company’s dilutive securities (the warrants and preferred shares) are assumed to be exercised and the proceeds used to repurchase shares ofcommon stock at the weighted average market price of the Company’s common stock during the relevant periods. Convertible shares are included in thediluted earnings/ (loss) per share, based on the weighted average number of convertible shares assumed to be outstanding during the period. The incrementalshares (the difference between the number of shares assumed issued and the number of shares assumed purchased) shall be included in the denominator of thediluted earnings per share computation.Net loss for both of the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 were adjusted for the purpose of the earnings per share calculation, for the dividends on theSeries B Convertible Preferred Stock and further adjusted for the undistributed net loss allocated to the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock. Net Loss for theyear ended December 31, 2010 was adjusted for the purposes of earnings per share calculation, to reflect the inducement of the Warrant Exercise Programdiscussed in Note 19.(v) Dividends: Dividends are recorded in the Company’s financial statements in the period in which they are declared.(w) Recent Accounting Pronouncements:Fair Value DisclosuresIn January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued amended standards requiring additional fair value disclosures. The amendedstandards require disclosures of transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy, as well as requiring gross basis disclosures for purchases,sales, issuances and settlements within the Level 3 reconciliation. Additionally, the update clarifies the requirement to determine the level of disaggregationfor fair value measurement disclosures and to disclose F-12 Table of ContentsNAVIOS MARITIME ACQUISITION CORPORATIONNOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except share and per share data) valuation techniques and inputs used for both recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements in either Level 2 or Level 3. Navios Acquisition adoptedthe new guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2010, except for the disclosures related to purchases, sales, issuance and settlements, which was effective forNavios Acquisition beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2012. The adoption of the new standards did not have a significant impact on Navios Acquisition’sconsolidated financial statements.NOTE 3: INITIAL VESSEL ACQUISITIONOn May 25, 2010, after its special meeting of stockholders, Navios Acquisition announced the approval of (a) the acquisition from Navios Holdings of 13vessels (11 product tankers and two chemical tankers) for an aggregate purchase price of $457,659, of which $128,659 was to be paid from existing cash andthe $329,000 balance with existing and new debt financing pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Acquisition Agreement by and between NaviosAcquisition and Navios Holdings and (b) certain amendments to Navios Acquisition’s amended and restated articles of incorporation.On May 28, 2010, Navios Acquisition consummated the acquisition of vessels, which constituted its initial business combination. In connection with thestockholder vote to approve the acquisition of vessels, holders of 10,021,399 shares of our common stock voted against the business combination andelected to redeem their shares in exchange for an aggregate of approximately $99,312 which amount was disbursed from our investments in trust account onMay 28, 2010. In addition, on May 28, 2010, Navios Acquisition disbursed an aggregate of $8,855 from the trust account to the underwriters of its IPO fordeferred fees. After disbursement of approximately $76,485 to Navios Holdings to reimburse it for the first equity installment payment on the vessels of$38,763 and other associated payments, the balance of the trust account of $66,118 was released to the Company for general operating expenses.Following the consummation of the transactions described in the Acquisition Agreement, Navios Holdings was released from all debt and equitycommitments for the above vessels and Navios Acquisition reimbursed Navios Holdings for vessel installments made prior to the stockholders’ meetingunder the purchase contracts for the vessels, plus all associated payments previously made by Navios Holdings amounting to $76,485.The initial acquisition was treated as an asset acquisition and the following table summarizes the consideration paid and fair values of assets and liabilitiesassumed on May 28, 2010. Initial Acquisition of 13 vessels Restricted Cash $35,596 Deposits for vessel acquisitions 174,411 Purchase options 3,158 Debt assumed (132,987)Long-term liabilities (3,158)Accrued expenses (112)Total $76,908 Cash paid, net of cash received of $57 $76,428 Payable to Navios Holdings 480 Total $76,908 NOTE 4: VLCC ACQUISITIONOn September 10, 2010, Navios Acquisition consummated the VLCC Acquisition for $134,270 of cash and the issuance of 1,894,918 shares of commonstock having a fair value of $10,745 (of which 1,378,122 shares were deposited into one-year escrow to provide for indemnity and other claims). The1,894,918 shares were valued using the opening price of the stock on the date of the acquisition of $5.67.Transaction costs amounted to $8,019 and have been fully expensed. Transaction costs include $5,619, which is the fair value of the 3,000 preferred shares,issued to a third party on September 17, 2010, as a compensation for consulting services (see note 19).On November 4, 2011 a total of 1,160,963 shares of common stock were released to the sellers and the remaining 217,159 were returned to NaviosAcquisition in settlement of claims relating to representations and warranties attributable to the sellers. The returned shares were cancelled on December 30,2011.The VLCC Acquisition contributed revenues of $26,592 and net loss of ($8,838) to Navios Acquisition for the year ended December 31, 2010. F-13 Table of ContentsNAVIOS MARITIME ACQUISITION CORPORATIONNOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except share and per share data) The VLCC Acquisition was treated as a business combination and the following table summarizes the consideration paid and the fair value of assets andliabilities assumed on September 10, 2010 and as further adjusted for the release of the escrow shares:VLCC Acquisition Purchase price: Cash consideration $134,270 Equity issuance 9,513 Total purchase price 143,783 Fair value of assets and liabilities acquired: Vessels 419,500 Deposits for vessel acquisition 62,575 Favorable lease terms 57,070 Current assets including cash of $32,232 35,716 Current liabilities (16,387) Long-term debt assumed (including current portion) (410,451) Unfavorable lease terms (5,819) Fair value of net assets acquired 142,204 Goodwill $1,579 The acquired intangible assets and liabilities, listed below, as determined at the acquisition date and where applicable, are amortized under the straight linemethod over the periods indicated below: Weightedaverageamortization(years) Amortizationper year Favorable lease terms 12.5 $(4,566) Unfavorable lease terms 8.5 683 The following is a summary of the acquired identifiable intangible assets: GrossAmount Description Favorable lease terms $ 57,070 Unfavorable lease terms (5,819) Total $51,251 NOTE 5: CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTSCash and cash equivalents consist of the following: December 31,2012 December 31,2011 Cash on hand and at banks $6,348 $8,333 Short-term deposits 36,498 32,967 Total cash and cash equivalents $42,846 $41,300 Restricted cash consists of cash totaling $10,075 and $29,491 as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively, restricted to pay future installments for vesseldeposits in accordance with Navios Acquisition’s new build program. Also in restricted cash is an amount of $11,088 for 2012 and $2,723 for 2011 held inretention account in order to service debt, interest payments and pledged accounts, as required by certain of Navios Acquisition’s credit facilities.Cash deposits and cash equivalents in excess of amounts covered by government-provided insurance are exposed to loss in the event of non-performance byfinancial institutions. The Company does maintain cash deposits and equivalents in excess of government-provided insurance limits. The Company alsominimizes exposure to credit risk by dealing with a diversified group of major financial institutions. F-14 Table of ContentsNAVIOS MARITIME ACQUISITION CORPORATIONNOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except share and per share data) NOTE 6: ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, NETAccounts receivable consist of the following: December 31,2012 December 31,2011 Accounts receivable $5,103 $6,478 Less: Provision for doubtful accounts — — Accounts receivable, net $5,103 $6,478 Financial instruments that potentially subject Navios Acquisition to concentrations of credit risk are accounts receivable. Navios Acquisition does notbelieve its exposure to credit risk is likely to have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.On October 28, 2011, the charter contract of the Nave Ariadne (ex Ariadne Jacob) and the Nave Cielo (ex Colin Jacob) were terminated prior to their originalexpiration in June 2013. Navios Acquisition entered into certain settlement agreements with charterers that provided for an amount of $4,909 to compensatefor the early termination of the charters and to cover any outstanding receivables. The amount $3,704 was recognized as compensation for early terminationand was recorded in revenue. Of the total compensation for early termination, the amount of $500 was received on December 19, 2012, the amount of $487classified under accounts receivable, net, will be settled during 2013 and the amount of $897, classified under long term assets, will be settled in installmentsuntil June 2015.NOTE 7: VESSELS, NET Cost AccumulatedDepreciation Net BookValue Vessels Balance at December 31, 2010 $538,751 $(9,092) $529,659 Additions 277,985 (33,020) 244,965 Balance at December 31, 2011 $816,736 $(42,112) $774,624 Additions 207,795 (41,681) 166,114 Balance at December 31, 2012 $1,024,531 $(83,793) $940,738 On January 20, 2012, Navios Acquisition took delivery of the Nave Estella, a 75,000 dwt South Korean—built LR1 product tanker, for a total cost of$44,643. Cash paid was $11,023 and $33,620 was transferred from vessel deposits.On July 31, 2012, Navios Acquisition took delivery of the Nave Atria, a 49,992 dwt South Korean—built MR2 product tanker, for a total cost of $37,583.Cash paid was $8,997 and $28,586 was transferred from vessel deposits.On August 31, 2012, Navios Acquisition took delivery of the Nave Cassiopeia, a 74,711 dwt South Korean—built LR1 product tanker, for a total cost of$43,827. Cash paid was $27,315, $3,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock were issued and $13,512 was transferred from vessel deposits.On October 30, 2012, Navios Acquisition took delivery of the Nave Cetus, a 74,581 dwt South Korean—built LR1 product tanker, for a total cost of $44,018.Cash paid was $27,545, $3,000 shares of Series D Preferred Stock were issued and $13,473 was transferred from vessel deposits.On November 9, 2012, Navios Acquisition took delivery of the Nave Aquila, a 49,991 dwt South Korean—built MR2 product tanker, for a total cost of$37,765. Cash paid was $12,686 and $25,079 was transferred from vessel deposits.On January 27, 2011, Navios Acquisition took delivery of the Nave Polaris, a 25,145 dwt South Korean—built chemical tanker, for a total cost of $31,774.Cash paid was $4,533 and $27,241 was transferred from vessel deposits.On June 8, 2011, Navios Acquisition took delivery of a 297,066 dwt VLCC, the Shinyo Kieran, from a Chinese shipyard, for a total cost of $119,443. Cashpaid was $29,298 and $90,145 was transferred from vessel deposits.On July 12, 2011, Navios Acquisition took delivery of the Bull, a 2009—built MR2 product tanker vessel of 50,542 dwt, for a total cost of $42,430 that waspaid with cash. Favorable lease terms recognized through this transaction amounted to $5,128 and the balance of $37,302 was classified under vessels, net.On July 18, 2011, Navios Acquisition took delivery of the Buddy, a 2009—built MR2 product tanker vessel of 50,470 dwt for a total cost of $42,490 thatwas paid with cash. Favorable lease terms recognized through this transaction amounted to $5,219 and the balance of $37,271 was classified under vessels,net.On November 14, 2011, Navios Acquisition took delivery of the Nave Andromeda, a 75,000 dwt LR1 South Korean—built product tanker, for a total cost of$44,319. Cash paid was $26,953 and $17,366 was transferred from vessel deposits. F-15 Table of ContentsNAVIOS MARITIME ACQUISITION CORPORATIONNOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except share and per share data) Improvements for vessels for the year ended December 31, 2012 amounted to $0 and $7,834 for 2011.Deposits for vessel acquisition represent deposits for vessels to be delivered in the future. As of December 31, 2012, Navios Acquisition vessel depositsamounted to $276,142 out of which $204,014 was financed through loans and the balance from existing cash. For the year ended December 31 2012,additions to deposits for vessels acquisitions comprising of cash payments and capitalized interest were $142,119, which was offset by $114,270, transferredto vessels, net. As of December 31, 2011, Navios Acquisition vessel deposits amounted to $245,567 out of which $167,152 was financed through loans, $825was financed through the issuance of preferred shares (see note 19) and the balance from existing cash. For the year ended December 31, 2011, $134,752 wastransferred to vessels.For the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, capitalized interest amounted to $14,240 and $11,450, respectively.NOTE 8: DEFERRED FINANCE COSTSDeferred finance costs consisted of the following: FinancingCosts Balance at December 31, 2010 $ 18,178 Additions 10,929 Capitalized into vessel deposits (766)Amortization (2,587)Deferred charges written-off (935)Balance at December 31, 2011 $24,819 Additions 42 Amortization (3,255) Capitalized into vessel deposits (879) Balance at December 31, 2012 $20,727 In 2011, an amount of $935 of deferred financing costs was written-off in relation to the cancellation of certain committed credit. In addition, theamortization income of the bond premium was $435 for 2012, $334 for 2011 and $0 for 2010.NOTE 9: INTANGIBLE ASSETS OTHER THAN GOODWILLIntangible assets as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 consist of the following: AcquisitionCost AccumulatedAmortization Net BookValueDecember 31,2012 Favorable lease terms $67,417 $(16,184) $51,233 Unfavorable lease terms (5,819) 1,574 (4,245) Total $61,598 $(14,610) $46,988 AcquisitionCost AccumulatedAmortization Transferto VesselDeposits Net BookValueDecember 31,2011 Purchase options $3,158 $— $(3,158) $— Favorable lease terms 67,417 (7,538) — 59,879 Total Intangible assets 70,575 (7,538) (3,158) 59,879 Unfavorable lease terms (5,819) 891 — (4,928)Total $64,756 $(6,647) $(3,158) $54,951 F-16 Table of ContentsNAVIOS MARITIME ACQUISITION CORPORATIONNOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except share and per share data) Amortization (expense)/income of favorable and unfavorable lease terms for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 are presented in thefollowing table: December 31,2012 December 31,2011 December 31,2010 Unfavorable lease terms charter-out $683 $683 $208 Favorable lease terms charter-out (8,646) (6,302) (1,236) Total $(7,963) $(5,619) $(1,028) The aggregate amortizations of acquired intangibles will be as follows: Description WithinOneYear YearTwo YearThree YearFour YearFive Thereafter Total Favorable lease terms $(8,646) $(7,551) $(4,959) $(4,913) $(2,846) $(22,318) $(51,233) Unfavorable lease terms 683 683 683 684 684 828 4,245 $(7,963) $(6,868) $(4,276) $(4,229) $(2,162) $(21,490) $(46,988) NOTE 10: GOODWILLGoodwill as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 consist of the following: Balance December 31, 2010 $1,579 Balance December 31, 2011 $1,579 Balance December 31, 2012 $1,579 NOTE 11: ACCOUNTS PAYABLEAccounts payable as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 consist of the following: December 31,2012 December 31,2011 Creditors $226 $51 Brokers 820 614 Professional and legal fees 231 356 Total accounts payable $1,277 $1,021 NOTE 12: DIVIDEND PAYABLEOn November 7, 2011, the Board of Directors of Navios Acquisition declared a quarterly cash dividend for the third quarter of 2011 of $0.05 per share ofcommon stock. A dividend in the aggregate amount of $2,421 was paid on January 5, 2012 out of which $2,037 was paid to the stock holders of record as ofDecember 15, 2011 and $384 was paid to the holders of 1,000 shares of the Series C preferred stock (which is Navios Holdings—see related party transactionsnote 17).On February 13, 2012, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend in respect of the fourth quarter of 2011 of $0.05 per common share ofcommon stock. A dividend in the aggregate amount of $2,410 was paid on April 5, 2012 out of which $2,026 was paid to the stock holders of record as ofMarch 22, 2012 and $384 was paid to the holder of 1,000 shares of the Series C preferred stock which is Navios Holdings (see related party transactions note17).On May 4, 2012, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend in respect of the first quarter of 2012 of $0.05 per share of common stock. Adividend in the aggregate amount of $2,410 was paid on July 3, 2012 out of which $2,026 was paid to the stock holders of record as of June 20, 2012 and$384 was paid to the holder of 1,000 shares of the Series C preferred stock which is Navios Holdings (see related party transactions note 17).On August 13, 2012, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend in respect of the second quarter of 2012 of $0.05 per share of common stock. Adividend in the aggregate amount of $2,410 was paid on October 3, 2012 out of which $2,026 was paid to the stock holders of record as of September 19,2012 and $384 was paid to the holder of 1,000 shares of the Series C preferred stock which is Navios Holdings (see related party transactions note 17). F-17 Table of ContentsNAVIOS MARITIME ACQUISITION CORPORATIONNOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except share and per share data) On November 9, 2012, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend in respect of the third quarter of 2012 of $0.05 per share of common stock. Adividend in the aggregate amount of $2,410 was paid on January 4, 2013 out of which $2,026 was paid to the stock holders of record as of December 19,2012 and $384 was paid to the holder of 1,000 shares of the Series C preferred stock which is Navios Holdings (see related party transactions note 17).As of December 31, 2012, Navios Acquisition paid a dividend of $108 to the holders of the 540 shares of Series B preferred stock.NOTE 13: ACCRUED EXPENSESAccrued expenses as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 consist of the following: December 31,2012 December 31,2011 Accrued voyage expenses $2,811 $1,262 Accrued loan interest 9,184 9,067 Accrued legal and professional fees 956 5,163 Total accrued expenses $12,951 $15,492 NOTE 14: BORROWINGS December 31,2012 December 31,2011 Commerzbank, Alpha Bank AE, Credit Agricole Corporate and InvestmentBank $137,383 $115,827 BNP Paribas S.A. and DVB Bank SE 58,361 36,175 DVB Bank SE and ABN AMRO Bank N.V. 42,034 44,121 Cyprus Popular Bank Public Co Ltd 32,400 24,300 Eurobank Ergasias S.A. $52.2 million 49,209 46,500 Eurobank Ergasias S.A. $52.0 million 45,894 18,200 ABN AMRO Bank N.V 47,298 53,260 Norddeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale 24,971 — DVB Bank SE and Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank 49,943 — Ship Mortgage Notes 505,000 505,000 Total borrowing 992,493 843,383 Less: current portion (19,724) (11,928) Add: bond premium 1,593 2,028 Total long-term borrowings $974,362 $833,483 Long-Term Debt Obligations and Credit ArrangementsSenior NotesShip Mortgage Notes: In October 2010, Navios Acquisition issued $400,000 of 8 5/8% First Priority Ship Mortgage Notes (the “Existing Notes”) due onNovember 1, 2017. The Existing Notes are senior obligations of Navios Acquisition and are secured by first priority ship mortgages on seven VLCC vesselsowned by certain subsidiary guarantors and certain other associated property and contract rights. The guarantees of the Company’s subsidiaries that ownmortgage vessels are senior secured guarantees and the guarantees of the Company’s subsidiaries that do not own mortgage vessels are senior unsecuredguarantees. Navios Acquisition may redeem the Existing Notes in whole or in part, at its option, at any time (1) before November 1, 2013 at a redemptionprice equal to 100% of the principal amount plus a make whole price which is based on a formula calculated using a discount rate of treasury bonds plus 50bps and (2) on or after November 1, 2013, at a fixed price of 104.313%, which price declines ratably until it reaches par. In addition, any time beforeNovember 1, 2013, Navios Acquisition may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of the Existing Notes with the net proceeds of an equityoffering at 108.625% of the principal amount of the Existing Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, so long as at least 65% of the originally issuedaggregate principal amount of the Existing Notes remains outstanding after such redemption. Furthermore, upon occurrence of certain change of controlevents, the holders of the Existing Notes may require Navios Acquisition to repurchase some or all of the Existing Notes at 101% of their face amount, plusaccrued and unpaid interest to the repurchase date. Pursuant to a registration rights agreement, Navios Acquisition filed a registration statement enabling theholders of the Existing Notes to exchange the privately placed notes with publicly F-18 Table of ContentsNAVIOS MARITIME ACQUISITION CORPORATIONNOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except share and per share data) registered notes with identical terms, which registration statement went effective on January 31, 2011. On February 2, 2011, the Navios Acquisitioncommenced the exchange offer which terminated on March 2, 2011. As a result of such exchange offer, 100% of the outstanding Existing Notes wereexchanged. The Existing Notes contain covenants which, among other things, limit the incurrence of additional indebtedness, issuance of certain preferredstock, the payment of dividends, redemption or repurchase of capital stock or making restricted payments and investments, creation of certain liens, transferor sale of assets, entering into certain transactions with affiliates, merging or consolidating or selling all or substantially all of Navios Acquisition’s propertiesand assets and creation or designation of restricted subsidiaries.On May 26, 2011, Navios Acquisition and Navios Acquisition Finance (US) Inc., its wholly owned finance subsidiary (“Navios Acquisition Finance”),completed the sale of $105,000 of 8 5/8% first priority ship mortgage notes due 2017 (the “Additional Notes”) at 102.25% plus accrued interest from May 1,2011.The Additional Notes are identical to the $400,000 of Existing Notes. The Existing Notes and the Additional Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteedon a joint and several bases by all of Navios Acquisition’s subsidiaries with the exception of Navios Acquisition Finance (a co-issuer of the ship mortgagenotes). The subsidiary guarantees are full and unconditional as that term is defined by Regulation S-X Rule 3-10, except for the fact that the indentureprovides for an individual subsidiary’s guarantee to be automatically released in certain customary circumstances, such as when a subsidiary is sold or allassets are sold, the capital stock is sold, when the subsidiary is designated as an “unrestricted subsidiary” for the purposes of the bond indenture, uponliquidation or dissolution or upon legal or covenant defeasance or satisfaction and discharge of the Existing Notes and the Additional Notes. A RegistrationStatement for the exchange of Additional Notes was filed on July 28, 2011 and was declared effective on August 22, 2011. On August 24, 2011 NaviosAcquisition commenced the exchange offer which terminated on September 23, 2011. As a result of such exchange offer, 100% of the outstanding AdditionalNotes were exchanged.The Additional Notes and the Existing Notes are treated as a single class for all purposes under the indenture including, without limitation, waivers,amendments, redemptions and other offers to purchase and the Additional Notes rank evenly with the Existing Notes. Following the consummation of theexchange offer for the Additional Notes on September 23, 2011, the Additional Notes and the Existing Notes have the same CUSIP number.Amortization of the bond premium for the each of the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 amounted to $435, $334 and $0, respectively.Credit FacilitiesCommerzbank AG, Alpha Bank A.E., and Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank: As a result of the initial business combination, Navios Acquisitionassumed a loan agreement dated April 7, 2010, with Commerzbank AG, Alpha Bank A.E. and Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank of up to$150,000 (divided in six equal tranches of $25,000 each) to partially finance the construction of two chemical tankers and four product tankers. Each trancheof the facility is repayable in 12 equal semi-annual installments of $750 each with a final balloon payment of $16,750 to be repaid on the last repaymentdate. The repayment of each tranche starts six months after the delivery date of the respective vessel which that tranche finances. It bears interest at a rate ofLIBOR plus 250 bps. The loan also requires compliance with certain financial covenants. As of December 31, 2012, $137,383 was outstanding under thisfacility and $7,367 remained to be drawn.BNP Paribas SA Bank and DVB Bank S.E.: As a result of the initial business combination, Navios Acquisition assumed a loan agreement dated April 8, 2010,of up to $75,000 (divided in three equal tranches of $25,000 each) for the purpose of part-financing the purchase price of three product tankers. Each of thetranche is repayable in 12 equal semi-annual installments of $750 each with a final balloon payment of $16,750 to be repaid on the last repayment date. Therepayment date of each tranche starts six months after the delivery date of the respective vessel which that tranche finances. It bears interest at a rate of LIBORplus 250 bps. The loan also requires compliance with certain financial covenants. As of December 31, 2012, $58,361 was outstanding and $16,639 remains tobe drawn under this facility.DVB Bank S.E. and ABN AMRO Bank N.V.: On May 28, 2010, Navios Acquisition entered into a loan agreement with DVB Bank S.E. and ABN AMROBANK N.V. of up to $52,000 (divided into two tranches of $26,000 each) to partially finance the acquisition costs of two product tanker vessels. Eachtranche of the facility is repayable in 24 equal quarterly installments of $448 each with a final balloon payment of $15,241 to be repaid on the last repaymentdate. The repayment of each tranche starts three months after the delivery date of the respective vessel. It bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 275 bps. Theloan also requires compliance with certain financial covenants. On December 29, 2011, Navios Acquisition prepaid $2,500 in relation to an amendment to itscredit facility. After the prepayment, outstanding amount under each tranche is repayable in five quarterly installments of $198 each, 13 equal quarterlyinstallments of $448 each, with a final balloon payment of $15,241 to be repaid on the last repayment date. On December 31, 2012, Navios Acquisitionprepaid $500 in relation to an amendment to its credit facility. After the prepayment, outstanding amount under each tranche is repayable in two quarterlyinstallments of $198 each, 13 equal quarterly installments of $448 each, with a final balloon payment of $15,241 to be repaid on the last repayment date. Asof December 31, 2012, the facility was fully drawn and the outstanding amount was $42,034.Cyprus Popular Bank Public Co Ltd: Cyprus Popular Bank Public Co Ltd: In September 2010, Navios Acquisition (through four subsidiaries) entered into a$80,000 revolving credit facility with Cyprus Popular Bank Public Co Ltd to partially finance the acquisition and construction of vessels and for investmentand working capital purposes. On September 7, 2012, the amount of the F-19 Table of ContentsNAVIOS MARITIME ACQUISITION CORPORATIONNOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except share and per share data) facility was reduced to $32,400. Drawings under the facility are secured by assignments of construction contracts and guarantees, as well as security interestsin related assets. The facility bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 275 bps. Pursuant to an agreement dated December 31, 2012, the maturity of the facilitywas extended to match the delivery of the vessels. As of December 31, 2012, the outstanding amount under this facility was $32,400 that was used topartially finance the acquisition cost of two product tanker vessels.EFG Eurobank Ergasias S.A.: On October 26, 2010, Navios Acquisition entered into a loan agreement with Eurobank Ergasias S.A. of up to $52,200 out ofwhich $51,600 has been drawn (divided into two tranches of $26,100 and $25,500) to partially finance the acquisition costs of two LR1 product tankervessels. Each tranche of the facility is repayable in 32 equal quarterly installments of $345 and $337 respectively, with a final balloon payment of $15,060and $14,716, to be repaid on the last repayment date. The repayment of each tranche started three months after the delivery date of the respective vessel. Theloan bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus (i) plus 250 bps for the period prior to the delivery date in respect of the vessel being financed, and (ii) thereafter275 bps. The loan also requires compliance with certain financial covenants. The facility was fully drawn and the outstanding amount as of December 31,2012 was $49,209.EFG Eurobank Ergasias S.A.: On December 6, 2010, Navios Acquisition entered into a loan agreement with Eurobank Ergasias S.A. of up to $52,000 out ofwhich $46,200 has been drawn (divided into two tranches of $23,100 each) to partially finance the acquisition costs of two LR1 product tanker vessels. Eachtranche of the facility is repayable in 32 equal quarterly installments of $306 each with a final balloon payment of $13,308, to be repaid on the lastrepayment date. The repayment of each tranche started three months after the delivery date of the respective vessel. It bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus300 bps. The loan also requires compliance with certain financial covenants. The facility was fully drawn and the outstanding amount as of December 31,2012 was $45,894.ABN AMRO BANK N.V.: On July 8, 2011, Navios Acquisition entered into a loan agreement with ABN AMRO Bank N.V of up to $55,100 (divided into twoequal tranches) to partially finance the purchase price of two MR2 product tanker vessels. The total amount of $54,750 was drawn under this facility. Eachtranche of the facility is repayable in 12 quarterly installments of $745 each and 12 quarterly installments of $571 each with a final balloon payment of$11,576 to be repaid on the last repayment date. The repayment of each tranche started in October 2011 and it bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 325 bps.The loan also requires compliance with certain financial covenants. As of December 31, 2012, $47,298 was outstanding under this loan agreement ($23,649from each of the two tranches) and no further amounts are available to be drawn.DVB Bank SE: On December 7, 2011, Navios Acquisition entered into a loan agreement with DVB Bank SE of up to $51,000 (divided into two tranches of$25,500 each) to partially finance the purchase price of two LR1 product tanker vessels. Each tranche of the facility is repayable in 28 quarterly installmentsof $400 each with a final balloon payment of $14,300 to be repaid on the last repayment date. The repayment starts three months after the delivery of therespective vessel and it bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 270 bps per annum. The loan also requires compliance with certain financial covenants. As ofDecember 31, 2012, no amounts were outstanding under this loan agreement and $51,000 remained undrawn.NORDDEUTSCHE LANDESBANK GIROZENTRALE: On December 29, 2011, Navios Acquisition entered into a loan agreement with NORDDEUTSCHELANDESBANK GIROZENTRALE of up to $28,125 to partially finance the purchase price of one MR2 product tanker vessel. The facility is repayable in 32quarterly installments of $391 each with a final balloon payment of $15,625 to be repaid on the last repayment date. The repayment starts three months afterthe delivery of the vessel and it bears interest at a rate of LIBOR plus: (a) up to but not including the Drawdown Date of, 175bps per annum; (b) thereafteruntil, but not including, the tenth Repayment Date, 250 bps per annum; and (c) thereafter 300 bps per annum. The loan also requires compliance with certainfinancial covenants. As of December 31, 2012, $24,971 was drawn and outstanding under this loan agreement and $3,154 remained to be drawn.DVB Bank SE and Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank: On December 29, 2011, Navios Acquisition entered into a loan agreement with DVBBank SE and Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment Bank of up to $56,250 (divided into two tranches of $28,125 each) to partially finance the purchaseprice of two MR2 product tanker vessels. Each tranche of the facility is repayable in 32 quarterly installments of $391 each with a final balloon payment of$15,625 to be repaid on the last repayment date. The repayment starts three months after the delivery of the respective vessel and it bears interest at a rate ofLIBOR plus: (a) up to but not including the Drawdown Date of, 175 bps per annum; (b) thereafter until, but not including, the tenth Repayment Date, 250 bpsper annum; and (c) thereafter 300 bps per annum. The loan also requires compliance with certain financial covenants. As of December 31, 2012, $49,943 wasdrawn and outstanding under this loan agreement and $6,307 remained to be drawn.The Navios Holdings Credit Facility: Navios Acquisition entered into a $40,000 credit facility with Navios Holdings and paid $400 as an arrangement fee.The $40,000 facility has a margin of LIBOR plus 300 bps and pursuant to an agreement dated November 8, 2011, the Navios Holdings’ credit facility wasextended to December 2014. Pursuant to an amendment in October 2010, the facility will be available for multiple drawings up to a limit of $40,000. As ofDecember 31, 2012 the outstanding amount under this facility was $35,000 and $5,000 remained to be drawn.As of December 31, 2012, the total amount available to be drawn from all our facilities was $89,467. F-20 Table of ContentsNAVIOS MARITIME ACQUISITION CORPORATIONNOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except share and per share data) The weighted average balance outstanding of our loan facilities for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $486,247 and the weighted average interest ratewas 3.25%. The weighted average balance outstanding of our loan facilities (excluding the Existing Notes and the Additional Notes) for the year endedDecember 31, 2011 was $327,174 and the weighted average interest rate was 3.16%.The loan facilities include, among other things, compliance with certain financial covenants: (i) minimum liquidity higher of $40,000 or $1,000 per vessel,including vessels under construction; (ii) net worth ranging from $50,000 to $75,000 up to January 2013, up to $135,000 thereafter; and (iii) total liabilitiesdivided by total assets, adjusted for market values to be lower than 75%, as of January 1, 2013 and thereafter.As of December 31, 2012, the Company was in compliance with its covenants.Amounts drawn under the facilities are secured by first preferred mortgages on Navios Acquisition’s vessels and other collateral and are guaranteed by eachvessel-owning subsidiary. The credit facilities contain a number of restrictive covenants that prohibit or limit Navios Acquisition from, among other things:incurring or guaranteeing indebtedness; entering into affiliate transactions; changing the flag, class, management or ownership of Navios Acquisition’svessels; changing the commercial and technical management of Navios Acquisition’s vessels; selling Navios Acquisition’s vessels; and subordinating theobligations under each credit facility to any general and administrative costs relating to the vessels, including the fixed daily fee payable under themanagement agreement. The credit facilities also require Navios Acquisition to comply with the ISM Code and ISPS Code and to maintain valid safetymanagement certificates and documents of compliance at all times. The credit facilities also require compliance with a number of financial covenants ofNavios Acquisition, including net worth, debt coverage ratios, and minimum liquidity. It is an event of default under the credit facilities if such covenants arenot complied with.GuaranteesThe Company’s Ship Mortgage Notes (consisting of the Existing Notes and the Additional Notes) are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a joint andseveral basis by all of the Company’s subsidiaries with the exception of Navios Acquisition Finance (a co-issuer of the ship mortgage notes). The guaranteesof our subsidiaries that own mortgaged vessels are senior secured guarantees and the guarantees of our subsidiaries that do not own mortgaged vessels aresenior unsecured guarantees. All subsidiaries, including Navios Acquisition Finance are 100% owned. The Navios Acquisition does not have anyindependent assets or operations. Navios Acquisition does not have any subsidiaries that are not guarantors of the 8 5/8% Notes. In addition, the disclosuresrequired by Rules 3-10(i)(9) and (10) are not applicable because there are no significant restrictions on (i) the ability of the parent company, any issuer (or co-issuer) or any guarantor subsidiaries of the 8 5/8% Notes to obtain funds by dividend or loan from any of their subsidiaries or (ii) the ability of anysubsidiaries to transfer funds to the issuer (or co-issuer) or any guarantor subsidiaries.The maturity table below reflects the principal payments of all Notes and credit facilities outstanding as of December 31, 2012 for the next five years andthereafter are based on the repayment schedule of the respective loan facilities (as described above) and the outstanding amount due under the senior Notes.The maturity table below includes in the amount shown for 2017 and thereafter future principal payments of the drawn portion of credit facilities associatedwith the financing of the construction of vessels scheduled to be delivered on various dates throughout 2014. December 31,2012 Long-Term Debt Obligations: Year December 31, 2013 $19,724 December 31, 2014 20,376 December 31, 2015 20,627 December 31, 2016 66,976 December 31, 2017 567,776 December 31, 2018 and thereafter 297,014 Total $992,493 NOTE 15: FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTSFair Value of Financial InstrumentsThe following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument:Cash and cash equivalents: The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for interest bearing deposits approximate their fair valuebecause of the short maturity of these investments.Restricted Cash: The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for interest bearing deposits approximate their fair value because of theshort maturity of these investments.Accounts receivable: Carrying amounts are considered to approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these accounts receivables and no significantchanges in interest rates. All amounts that are assumed to be uncollectible are written off and/or reserved. F-21 Table of ContentsNAVIOS MARITIME ACQUISITION CORPORATIONNOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except share and per share data) Accounts payable: The carrying amount of accounts payable reported in the balance sheet approximates its fair value due to the short-term nature of theseaccounts payable and no significant changes in interest rates.Other long term borrowings: The carrying amount of the floating rate loans approximates its fair value.Ship Mortgage Notes: The fair value of the Notes, which has a fixed rate, was determined based on quoted market prices, as indicated in the table below.Loans due to related party: The carrying amount of the floating rate loans approximates its fair value. December 31, 2012 December 31, 2011 BookValue Fair Value BookValue Fair Value Cash and cash equivalents $42,846 $42,846 $41,300 $41,300 Restricted cash $21,163 $21,163 $32,214 $32,214 Accounts receivable, net $5,103 $5,103 $6,478 $6,478 Accounts payable $1,277 $1,277 $1,021 $1,021 Ship mortgage notes and premium $506,593 $482,275 $507,028 $385,088 Other Long-term debt $487,493 $487,493 $338,383 $338,383 Loans due to related party $35,000 $35,000 $40,000 $40,000 Due to related parties, short term $27,815 $27,815 $43,616 $43,616 Due to related parties, long term $57,701 $57,701 $— $— Fair Value MeasurementsThe estimated fair value of our financial instruments that are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis, categorized based upon the fair value hierarchy,are as follows:Level I: Inputs are unadjusted, quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that we have the ability to access. Valuation of these itemsdoes not entail a significant amount of judgment.Level II: Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level I that are observable for the asset or liability through corroboration with market data at themeasurement date.Level III: Inputs that are unobservable. The Company did not use any Level 3 inputs as of December 31, 2012. Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2012 Using Total Level I Level II Level III Cash and cash equivalents $42,846 $42,846 $— $— Restricted cash $21,163 $21,163 $— $— Ship mortgage notes and premium $482,275 $482,275 $— $— Other Long-term debt $487,493 $— $487,493 $— Loans due to related party $35,000 $— $35,000 $— Due to related parties, long term $57,701 $— $57,701 $— (1)The fair value of the Company’s other long term debt, loans due to related party and due to related parties, long term is estimated based on currentlyavailable debt with similar contract terms, interest rate and remaining maturities as well as taking into account our creditworthiness.NOTE 16: LEASESChartered-out:The future minimum contractual lease income (charter-out rates is presented net of commissions), including revenue for vessels expected to deliver in 2013for which a charter party has been concluded, is as follows: Amount 2013 $ 179,419 2014 141,980 2015 111,461 2016 91,835 2017 48,174 Thereafter 292,437 Total minimum lease revenue, net of commissions $865,306 F-22(1)(1)(1)(1)(1)(1) Table of ContentsNAVIOS MARITIME ACQUISITION CORPORATIONNOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except share and per share data) Revenues from time charters are not generally received when a vessel is off-hire, including time required for scheduled maintenance of the vessel.NOTE 17: TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIESPursuant to an Exchange Agreement entered into on March 30, 2011, Navios Holdings exchanged 7,676,000 shares of Navios Acquisition’s common stock itheld for 1,000 shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock of Navios Acquisition (see note 19). As of December 31, 2012, dividends paid to NaviosHoldings amounted to $1,536 and dividends payable amounted to $384. As of December 31, 2011, dividends paid to Navios Holdings amounted to $768and dividends payable amounted to $384.The Navios Holdings Credit Facility: Navios Acquisition entered into a $40,000 credit facility with Navios Holdings. The $40,000 facility has a margin ofLIBOR plus 300 bps and a pursuant to an amendment dated November 8, 2011, the maturity of the facility was extended to December 2014. Pursuant to anamendment in October 2010, the facility will be available for multiple drawings up to a limit of $40,000. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, the outstandingamount under this facility was $35,000 and $40,000, respectively, and was included under loans due to related parties. For the years ended December 31,2012, 2011 and 2010, interest expense in relation to this facility amounted to $1,164, $710 and $236, respectively, and was included under interest expenseand finance cost, net in the statement of operations. Accrued interest as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 was $1 and $62, respectively.Management fees: Pursuant to a Management Agreement dated May 28, 2010, Navios Tankers Management Inc. (the “Manager”), a subsidiary of NaviosHoldings, provides for five years from the closing of the Company’s initial vessel acquisition, commercial and technical management services to NaviosAcquisition’s vessels for a daily fee of $6 per owned MR2 product tanker and chemical tanker vessel and $7 per owned LR1 product tanker vessel and $10per VLCC tanker vessel for the first two years. On May 4, 2012, Navios Acquisition amended its existing Management Agreement with the Manager, to fixthe fees for ship management services of its owned fleet at current rates for two additional years, through May 28, 2014. This daily fee covers all of thevessels’ operating expenses, other than certain fees and costs. During the remaining one year of the term of the Management Agreement, Navios Acquisitionexpects it will reimburse Navios Holdings for all of the actual operating costs and expenses it incurs in connection with the management of its fleet. Actualoperating costs and expenses will be determined in a manner consistent with how the initial fixed fees were determined. Drydocking expenses are fixed forthe first four years under these agreements for up to $300 per LR1 and MR2 product tanker vessel and will be reimbursed at cost for VLCC vessels.Commencing as of March 30, 2012, Navios Acquisition can, upon request to the Manager, partially or fully defer the reimbursement of drydocking and otherextraordinary fees and expenses under the Agreement to a later date, but not later than January 4, 2014, and if reimbursed on a later date, such amounts willbear interest at a rate of 1% per annum over LIBOR. Commencing as of September 28, 2012, Navios Acquisition could, upon request, reimburse the Managerpartially or fully, for any fixed management fees outstanding for a period of not more than nine months under the Agreement at a later date, but not later thanDecember 31, 2014, and if reimbursed on a later date, such amounts will bear interest at a rate of 1% per annum over LIBOR. Total management fees for eachof the year ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 amounted to $47,043, $35,679 and $9,752, respectively.General and administrative expenses: On May 28, 2010, Navios Acquisition entered into an administrative services agreement with the Manager, expiringon May 28, 2015, pursuant to which a subsidiary of Navios Holdings provides certain administrative management services to Navios Acquisition whichinclude: bookkeeping, audit and accounting services, legal and insurance services, administrative and clerical services, banking and financial services,advisory services, client and investor relations and other. The Manager is reimbursed for reasonable costs and expenses incurred in connection with theprovision of these services. For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 the administrative services rendered by the Manager amounted to $2,110,$1,527 and $407, respectively.Balance due to related parties: Amounts due to related parties as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, was $85,516 and $43,616, respectively, of which thecurrent account payable to Navios Holdings and its subsidiaries was $27,815 and $43,616, respectively, and the long term payable was $57,701 and $0,respectively. The balance mainly consisted of management fees administrative fees, drydocking costs and other expenses.Omnibus agreement: Navios Acquisition entered into an omnibus agreement (the “Acquisition Omnibus Agreement”) with Navios Holdings and NaviosMaritime Partners L.P. (“Navios Partners”) in connection with the closing of Navios Acquisition’s vessel acquisition, pursuant to which, among other things,Navios Holdings and Navios Partners agreed not to acquire, charter-in or own liquid shipment vessels, except for container vessels and vessels that areprimarily employed in operations in South America without the consent of an independent committee of Navios Acquisition. In addition, NaviosAcquisition, under the Acquisition Omnibus Agreement, agreed to cause its subsidiaries not to acquire, own, operate or charter drybulk carriers under specificexceptions. Under the Acquisition Omnibus Agreement, Navios Acquisition and its subsidiaries grant to Navios Holdings and Navios Partners, a right of firstoffer on any proposed sale, transfer or other disposition of any of its drybulk carriers and related charters owned or acquired by Navios Acquisition. Likewise,Navios Holdings and Navios Partners agreed to grant a similar right of first offer to Navios Acquisition for any liquid shipment vessels they might own. Theserights of first offer will not apply to a (a) sale, transfer or other disposition of vessels between any affiliated subsidiaries, or pursuant to the existing terms ofany charter or other agreement with a counterparty, or (b) merger with or into, or sale of substantially all of the assets to, an unaffiliated third party. F-23 Table of ContentsNAVIOS MARITIME ACQUISITION CORPORATIONNOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except share and per share data) NOTE 18 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIESAs of December 31, 2012, Navios Acquisition committed for future remaining contractual deposits for the vessels to be delivered on various dates throughOctober 2014.The Company is involved in various disputes and arbitration proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. Provisions have been recognized in thefinancial statements for all such proceedings where the Company believes that a liability may be probable, and for which the amounts are reasonablyestimable, based upon facts known at the date of the financial statements were prepared. In the opinion of the management, the ultimate disposition of thesematters individually and in aggregate will not materially affect the Company’s financial position, results of operations or liquidity.The future minimum commitments by period as of December 31, 2012, of Navios Acquisition under its ship building contracts, are as follows: Amount December 31, 2013 $69,170 December 31, 2014 35,880 Total $105,050 NOTE 19: PREFERRED AND COMMON STOCKPreferred StockThe Company is authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of $0.0001 par value preferred stock with such designations, voting and other rights and preferencesas may be determined from time to time by the Board of Directors.On March 30, 2011, pursuant to an Exchange Agreement Navios Holdings exchanged 7,676,000 shares of Navios Acquisition’s common stock it held for1,000 non-voting Series C Convertible Preferred Stock of Navios Acquisition. Each holder of shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock shall be entitledat their option at any time, after March 31, 2013 to convert all or any the outstanding shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock into a number of fullypaid and non-assessable shares of Common Stock determined by multiplying each share of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock to be converted by 7,676,subject to certain limitations. Upon the declaration of a common stock dividend, the holders of the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled toreceive dividends on the Series C Convertible Preferred Stock in an amount equal to the amount that would have been received in the number of shares ofCommon Stock into which the Shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock held by each holder thereof could be converted. The shares of Series C PreferredStock were recorded at fair value of the common stock exchanged which totaled $30,474, using the common stock price on March 30, 2011 of $3.97. Theimpact of the exchange (other than the par value of the common and preferred stock) was recorded net in Additional-Paid-In-Capital. No fees were incurred inconnection with the above issuance. For the purpose of calculating loss per share this preferred stock is treated as in-substance common stock and is allocatedlosses and considered in the diluted calculation.On September 17, 2010, Navios Acquisition issued 3,000 shares of the Company’s authorized Series A Convertible Preferred Stock (fair value of $5,619) toan independent third party as a consideration for certain consulting and advisory fees related to the VLCC acquisition. The Company valued these shares onand accounted for these shares as issued and outstanding from September 17, 2010 since all services had been provided. The $5,619 has been recorded in theaccompanying financial statements as transaction costs. Under the terms of the consulting agreement, the preferred stock will be distributed in tranches of300 shares every six months commencing on June 30, 2011 and ending on December 15, 2015. Accordingly, the shares of Series A Preferred Stock and theshares of common stock underlying them, will only be eligible for transfer upon distribution to the holder. The preferred stock has no voting rights, is onlyconvertible into shares of common stock and does not participate in dividends until such time as the shares are converted into common stock. The holder ofthe preferred stock also has the right to convert their shares to common stock subject to certain terms and conditions at any time after distribution at aconversion price of $35.00 per share of common stock. Any shares of preferred stock remaining outstanding on December 31, 2015 shall automaticallyconvert into shares of common stock at a conversion price of $25.00 per share of common stock. The fair market value on September 17, 2010, wasdetermined using a binomial valuation model. The model used takes into account the credit spread of the Company, the volatility of its stock, as well as theprice of its stock at the issuance date.On October 29, 2010, Navios Acquisition issued 540 shares of the Company’s authorized Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (fair value $1,649) to the sellerof the two newbuild LR1 product tankers the Company recently acquired and were included in the vessel cost. The preferred stock contains a 2% per annumdividend payable quarterly starting on January 1, 2011 and upon declaration by the Company’s Board commences payment on March 31, 2011. The Series BConvertible Preferred Stock, plus any accrued but unpaid dividends, will mandatorily convert into shares of common stock as follows: 30% of theoutstanding amount will convert on June 30, 2015 and the remaining outstanding amounts will convert on June 30, 2020 at a price per share of commonstock not less than $25.00. The holder of the preferred stock shall have the right to convert the shares of preferred stock into common stock prior to thescheduled maturity dates at F-24 Table of ContentsNAVIOS MARITIME ACQUISITION CORPORATIONNOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except share and per share data) a price of $35.00 per share of common stock. The preferred stock does not have any voting rights. The fair value on October 29, 2010, was determined using abinomial valuation model. The model used takes into account the credit spread of the Company, the volatility of its stock, as well as the price of its stock atthe issuance date.As of each of December 31, 2012 and 2011, 4,540 shares of preferred stock were issued and outstanding. As of December 31, 2012, 600 shares of convertiblepreferred stock were outstanding. Fees incurred in 2010 connection with the issuance of the above shares of preferred stock amounted to $1,805.Redeemable Convertible Preferred StockOn each of August 31, 2012, and October 31, 2012, Navios Acquisition issued in total 300 shares (600 in the aggregate) of its authorized Series DConvertible Preferred Stock (nominal and fair value $6,000) (“Series D Preferred Stock”) to a shipyard, in partial settlement of two newbuild LR1 producttankers, the Nave Cassiopeia and the Nave Cetus. The Series D Preferred Stock contains a 6% per annum dividend payable quarterly, starting one year afterdelivery of each vessel. The Series D Preferred Stock will mandatorily convert into shares of common stock 30 months after issuance at a price per share ofcommon stock equal to $10.00. The holder of the Series D Preferred Stock shall have the right to convert the shares of Series D Preferred Stock into commonstock prior to the scheduled maturity dates at a price of $7.00 per share of common stock. The Series D Preferred Stock does not have any voting rights.Navios Acquisition is obligated to redeem the Series D Preferred Stock (or converted common shares), at holder’s option exercisable beginning on 18 monthsafter issuance, at par payable at up to 12 equal quarterly installments.The fair value was determined using a combination of Black Scholes model and discounted projected cash flows for the conversion option and put,respectively. The model used takes into account the credit spread of Navios Acquisition, the volatility of its stock, as well as the price of its stock at theissuance date. The convertible preferred stock is classified as temporary equity (i.e., apart from permanent equity) as a result of the redemption feature uponexercise of the put option granted to the holder of the preferred stock.Redeemable Convertible Preferred and Common Stock is presented in the following table: Preferred Stock Common Stock Numberofpreferredshares Amount Number ofcommonshares Amount Balance January 1, 2010 — — 10,119,999 $ 100,289 Common stock redeemed — $— (10,021,399) (99,312) Common stock not redeemed (98,600) (977) Balance December 31, 2010 — — — — — $— — $— Balance December 31, 2011 — — — — Issuance of preferred stock subject to redemption 600 6,000 Balance December 31, 2012 600 $ 6,000 — $— Common StockOn November 19, 2010, the Company completed the public offering of 6,500,000 shares of common stock at $5.50 per share and raised gross proceeds of$35,750. The net proceeds of this offering, including the underwriting discount of $1,787 and excluding offering costs of $561 were $33,963.Pursuant to an Exchange Agreement entered into on March 30, 2011, Navios Holdings exchanged 7,676,000 shares of Navios Acquisition’s common stock itheld for 1,000 non-voting shares of Series C Convertible Preferred Stock of Navios Acquisition.The Company is authorized to issue 250,000,000 shares of $0.0001 par value common stock. F-25 Table of ContentsNAVIOS MARITIME ACQUISITION CORPORATIONNOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except share and per share data) Warrant Exercise ProgramOn September 2, 2010, Navios Acquisition completed its Warrant Exercise Program (the “Warrant Exercise Program”). Under the Warrant Exercise Program,holders of public warrants had the opportunity to exercise the public warrants on enhanced Terms through August 27, 2010.The Warrant Exercise Program was coupled with a consent solicitation accelerating the ability of Navios Holdings and its officers and directors to exercisecertain private warrants on the same terms available to the public warrants during the Warrant Exercise Program.As a result of the above: • 19,246,056 public warrants (76.13% of the public warrants then outstanding) were exercised on a cashless basis at an exchange rate of 4.25 publicwarrants for one share of common stock; • $78,342 of gross cash proceeds were raised from the exercise of 15,950 of the public warrants by payment of $5.65 cash exercise price, and 13,850,000private warrants owned by Navios Holdings and Angeliki Frangou, Navios Acquisition’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer; Total expensesassociated with the Warrant Exercise Program were $3,364. • a portion of the private warrants exercised were held by officers and directors of Navios Acquisition, 15,000 and 75,000 were exercised on a cash basisand cashless basis, respectively; and • 18,412,053 new shares of common stock were issued.On September 2, 2010, Navios Acquisition completed its Warrant Exercise Program under which holder of its publicly traded and privately held warrants hadthe opportunity to exercise their warrants on enhanced terms as described above. As a result of the Warrant Exercise Program and subsequent warrantexercises, as of December 31, 2010, the Company had outstanding 6,037,994 publicly traded warrants which were classified as equity, since they cannot becash settled. The fair value of the warrants after the inducement offer were compared to the fair value prior to the inducement, which resulted in incrementalfair value of $647 transferred to shareholders who exercised on a cashless basis. This incremental fair value has been reflected in the net loss per sharecalculation for the year ended December 31, 2010.As of December 31, 2012 there were 6,037,994 public warrants outstanding. Included in the number of shares and warrants are 12,752 units (one unit consistsof one share of common stock and one warrant).NOTE 20: SEGMENT INFORMATIONNavios Acquisition reports financial information and evaluates its operations by charter revenues. Navios Acquisition does not use discrete financialinformation to evaluate operating results for each type of charter. As a result, management reviews operating results solely by revenue per day and operatingresults of the fleet and thus Navios Acquisition has determined that it operates under one reportable segment.The following table sets out operating revenue by geographic region for Navios Acquisition’s reportable segment. Revenue is allocated on the basis of thegeographic region in which the customer is located. Tanker vessels operate worldwide. Revenues from specific geographic region which contribute over 10%of total revenue are disclosed separately.Revenue by Geographic RegionVessels operate on a worldwide basis and are not restricted to specific locations. Accordingly, it is not possible to allocate the assets of these operations tospecific countries. Year EndedDecember 31,2012 Year EndedDecember 31,2011 Year EndedDecember 31,2010 Asia $131,263 $105,952 $27,311 Europe 16,881 15,282 6,257 United States 2,953 691 — Total Revenue $151,097 $121,925 $33,568 NOTE 21: LOSS PER COMMON SHARELoss per share is calculated by dividing net loss available to common stockholders by the average number of shares of common stock of Navios Acquisitionoutstanding during the period.Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was adjusted for the purposes of earnings per share calculation, for the dividends on Series BPreferred Shares and for the undistributed loss that is attributable to Series C preferred stock. F-26 Table of ContentsNAVIOS MARITIME ACQUISITION CORPORATIONNOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except share and per share data) The average number of shares of common stock of Navios Acquisition for the year ended December 31, 2011 excludes the 1,378,122 contingently returnableshares of common stock issued on September 10, 2010 for the VLCC Acquisition which were deposited into a one year escrow to provide for indemnity andother claims (see note 4) until November 4, 2011 when 1,160,963 of these shares were released to the sellers and 217,159 were returned to Navios Acquisitionin settlement of claims relating to representations and warranties attributable to the sellers of the VLCC Acquisition and were cancelled on December 30,2011.Net Loss for the year ended December 31, 2010 is adjusted for the purposes of earnings per share calculation, to reflect the inducement of the WarrantExercise Program discussed in Note 19. The inducement resulted to the adjustment in the income available to common stockholders, for the earnings pershare calculation, by $647, which represents the incremental value that was given to the warrant holders in order to exercise their warrants. The averagenumber of shares of common stock of Navios Acquisition for the year ended December 31, 2010 excludes the 1,378,122 contingently returnable shares ofcommon stock issued on September 10, 2010 for the VLCC Acquisition which were deposited into a one year escrow to provide for indemnity and otherclaims (see Note 4).For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 potential common shares and shares kept in escrow have an anti-dilutive effect (i.e. those thatincrease income per share or decrease loss per share) and are therefore excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share. Year endedDecember 31,2012 Year endedDecember 31,2011 Year endedDecember 31,2010 Numerator: Net Loss $(3,798) $(3,857) $(13,546) Incremental fair value of securities offered to induce warrantsexercise — — (647) Dividend declared on preferred shares Series B (108) (108) — Undistributed loss attributable to Series C participating preferredshares 622 587 — Loss attributable to common stockholders $(3,284) $(3,378) $(14,193) Denominator: Denominator for basic net loss per share — weighted averageshares 40,517,413 41,409,433 32,677,318 Denominator for diluted net loss per share — adjusted weightedaverage shares 40,517,413 41,409,433 32,677,318 Basic net loss per share $(0.08) $(0.08) $(0.43) Diluted net loss per share $(0.08) $(0.08) $(0.43) NOTE 22: INCOME TAXESMarshall Islands, Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands, and Hong Kong, do not impose a tax on international shipping income. Under the laws ofMarshall Islands, of the companies’ incorporation and vessels’ registration, the companies are subject to registration and tonnage taxes which have beenincluded in the daily management fee.As of January 1, 2013, foreign flagged vessels that are managed by Greek or foreign ship management companies in Greece are subject to Greektonnage tax. The payment of tonnage tax exhausts the tax liability of the foreign ship owning company against any tax, duty, charge or contribution payableon income from the exploitation of the foreign flagged vessel.Pursuant to Section 883 of the Internal Revenue Code of the United States (the “Code”), U.S. source income from the international operation of ships isgenerally exempt from U.S. income tax if the company operating the ships meets certain incorporation and ownership requirements. Among other things, inorder to qualify for this exemption, the company operating the ships must be incorporated in a country, which grants an equivalent exemption from incometaxes to U.S. corporations. All the Navios Acquisition’s ship-operating subsidiaries satisfy these initial criteria. In addition, these companies must meet anownership test. Subject to proposed regulations becoming finalized in their current form, the management of Navios Acquisition believes by virtue of aspecial rule applicable to situations where the ship operating companies are beneficially owned by a publicly traded company like Navios Acquisition, thesecond criterion can also be satisfied based on the trading volume and ownership of the Company’s shares, but no assurance can be given that this willremain so in the future. Due to the exemption under Section 883 of the Code, Delaware would not impose a tax on the Company or its subsidiaries’international shipping income. F-27 Table of ContentsNAVIOS MARITIME ACQUISITION CORPORATIONNOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars except share and per share data) NOTE 23: SUBSEQUENT EVENTSIn February 2013, Navios Acquisition completed multiple offerings, including registered direct offerings, of a total of 35,246,791 shares of its common stock,at a price of $2.85 per share representing gross proceeds of $100,453. The offerings were conducted as follows: • The first registered direct offering of 7,719,300 shares of common stock was completed on February 21, 2013, raising $22,000 of gross proceeds.The net proceeds of this offering, including the agents’ fees of $880 and excluding estimated offering costs of approximately $320, were$21,120. • The second registered direct offering of 9,825,000 shares of common stock was completed on February 26, 2013, raising $28,001 of grossproceeds. The net proceeds of this offering, including the agents’ fees of $1,120 and excluding estimated offering costs of approximately $320,were $26,881. • In addition, Navios Holdings and certain members of management of Navios Acquisition, Navios Holdings and Navios Partners purchased anaggregate of 17,702,491 shares of common stock in a private placement that was completed on February 26, 2013, raising $50,452 of grossproceeds. The net proceeds of this private placement, including the agents’ fees of $2,018, were $48,434.On February 13, 2013, Navios Acquisition took delivery of the Nave Rigel, a new building LR1 product tanker vessel of 74,673 dwt, from a South Koreanshipyard. Nave Rigel has been chartered out to a high quality counterparty for one year at a rate of $12 net per day plus 50% profit sharing based on aformula. The charterer has been granted an option for an additional six months at the same rate. Navios Acquisition issued 300 shares of its authorized SeriesD Preferred Stock to the shipyard, in partial settlement of the purchase price.On February 07, 2013, the Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend in respect of the fourth quarter of 2012 of $0.05 per common share payableon April 4, 2013 to stockholders of record as of March 19, 2013. The declaration and payment of any further dividends remains subject to the discretion ofthe Board and will depend on, among other things, Navios Acquisition’s cash requirements as measured by market opportunities and restrictions under itscredit agreements and other debt obligations and such other factors as the Board may deem advisable.On January 24, 2013, Navios Acquisition took delivery of the Nave Bellatrix, a 49,999 dwt MR2 product tanker vessel, from a South Korean shipyard. Thevessel is chartered out to a high quality counterparty for three years at a rate of $13 net per day plus 50% profit sharing. The charterer will receive the first $1of profits above the base rate and the owner will receive next $1 of profits. Thereafter, all profits will be split equally to each party. The charterer has beengranted an option for an additional year at a rate of $15 net per day plus 50% profit sharing. F-28 Exhibit 8.1Subsidiaries of Navios Maritime Acquisition CorporationAegean Sea Maritime Holdings Inc., a Marshall Islands Holdings companyAmorgos Shipping Corporation, a Marshall Islands corporationAndros Shipping Corporation, a Marshall Islands corporationAntikithira Shipping Corporation, a Marshall Islands corporationAntiparos Shipping Corporation, a Marshall Islands corporationAmindra Shipping Co., a Marshall Islands corporationCrete Shipping Corporation, a Marshall Islands corporationFolegandros Shipping Corporation, a Marshall Islands corporationIkaria Shipping Corporation, a Marshall Islands corporationIos Shipping Corporation, a Cayman Islands corporationKithira Shipping Corporation, a Marshall Islands corporationKos Shipping Corporation, a Marshall Islands corporationMytilene Shipping Corporation, a Marshall Islands corporationNavios Acquisition Finance (US) Inc., a Delaware companyRhodes Shipping Corporation, a Marshall Islands corporationSerifos Shipping Corporation, a Marshall Islands corporationShinyo Dream Limited, a Hong Kong limited companyShinyo Kannika Limited, a Hong Kong limited companyShinyo Kieran Limited, a British Virgin Islands limited companyShinyo Loyalty Limited, a Hong Kong limited companyShinyo Navigator Limited, a Hong Kong limited companyShinyo Ocean Limited, a Hong Kong limited companyShinyo Saowalak Limited, a British Virgin Islands limited companySifnos Shipping Corporation, a Marshall Islands corporationSkiathos Shipping Corporation, a Marshall Islands corporationSkopelos Shipping Corporation, a Cayman Islands corporationSyros Shipping Corporation, a Marshall Islands corporationThera Shipping Corporation, a Marshall Islands corporationTinos Shipping Corporation, a Marshall Islands corporationOinousses Shipping Corporation, a Marshall Islands corporationPsara Shipping Corporation, a Marshall Islands corporationAntipsara Shipping Corporation, a Marshall Islands corporation Exhibit 12.1CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, Angeliki Frangou, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 of Navios Maritime Acquisition Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the companyand have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordancewith generally accepted accounting principles;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual reportthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting: and5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to thecompany’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal controls overfinancial reporting. /s/ Angeliki FrangouAngeliki FrangouChief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)Date: March 25, 2013 Exhibit 12.2CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002I, Leonidas Korres, certify that:1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2012 of Navios Maritime Acquisition Corporation;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the companyand have:a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, toprovide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordancewith generally accepted accounting principles;c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report on such evaluation; andd) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual reportthat has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting: and5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to thecompany’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; andb) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal controls overfinancial reporting. /s/ Leonidas KorresLeonidas KorresChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)Date: March 25, 2013 Exhibit 13.1CertificationPursuant To Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of2002(Subsections (A) And (B) Of Section 1350,Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of theundersigned officers of Navios Maritime Acquisition Corporation, (the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:(i) the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Form 20-F”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;(ii) and the information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: March 25, 2013 /s/ Angeliki Frangou Angeliki Frangou Chief Executive OfficerDated: March 25, 2013 /s/ Leonidas Korres Leonidas Korres Chief Financial Officer Exhibit 15.1CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMWe hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form F-3 (Nos. 333-169320, 333-170896 and 333-151707) of NaviosMaritime Acquisition Corporation of our report dated March 25, 2013 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control overfinancial reporting, which appears in this Form 20-F./s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers S.A.Athens, GreeceMarch 25, 2013
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above