Quarterlytics / Industrials / Security & Protection Services / Newmark Security plc

Newmark Security plc

nwt · LSE Industrials
Claim this profile
Ticker nwt
Exchange LSE
Sector Industrials
Industry Security & Protection Services
Employees 51-200
← All annual reports
FY2013 Annual Report · Newmark Security plc
Loading PDF…
Company number: 3339998

Report and Financial Statements

Year ended 30 April 2013

INDEX

DIRECTORS, SECRETARY AND ADVISERS

CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT

REPORT OF THE DIRECTORS

REPORT OF THE REMUNERATION COMMITTEE

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

COMPANY BALANCE SHEET

NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF THE COMPANY

NOTICE OF ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING

Page

2

3

6

10

11

13

18

42

43

48

Newmark Security PLC
1

DIRECTORS, SECRETARY AND ADVISERS

Country of incorporation of
parent company:

Great Britain

Legal form:

Directors:

Public Limited Company

M Dwek
M C Dwek
B Beecraft
D Blethyn
M Rapoport
R Waddington

Secretary and registered office:

B Beecraft, 58 Grosvenor Street, London W1K 3JB

Company number:

3339998

Auditors:

BDO LLP, 2 City Place, Beehive Ring Road, Gatwick, West Sussex RH6 0PA

Nominated Adviser:

Cantor Fitzgerald, 17 Crosswall, London EC3N 2LB

Brokers:

Registrars:

Cantor Fitzgerald, 17 Crosswall, London EC3N 2LB

Capita Registrars, The Registry, 34 Beckenham Road,
Beckenham, Kent BR3 4TU

Solicitors:

Field Fisher Waterhouse, 35 Vine Street, London EC3N 2AA

Newmark Security PLC
2

CHAIRMAN’S STATEMENT

I am delighted to report a year of substantial improvement in revenue and gross profit for the year ended 30 April
2013. Group revenue for the year was £18,316k (2012: £13,094k), an increase of 39.9 per cent. Revenue in the
electronic division increased by 9.5 per cent. from £6,039k to £6,615k, whilst the asset protection division revenue
increased by 65.9 per cent in the year from £7,055k to £11,701k.
I stated last year that the concept of our cash in transit box had proved successful but that the Board had decided
to develop a new outer casing using different and lighter materials. This new design offers greater flexibility and
will  save  costs  going  forward.  However  procedural  changes  by  customers  have  lengthened  the  redevelopment
timetable and it is expected that field trials will restart with customers next month. In view of the redevelopment
of the box, an impairment provision of £483k is required under IAS36 in respect of the costs incurred prior to the
start of the redevelopment and this has been included in cost of sales within the income statement. The Board
believes that there is still a substantial market for the box when it has successfully completed all the trials. The
impairment provision in the previous year of £194k related to a separate development.
After these impairment charges, gross profit for the year from continuing operations was £7,395k (40.4 per cent.
of sales) compared to £5,268k (40.2 per cent.). Otherwise the change in gross margin reflects the mix of sales.
Further enhancements have been made to our new access control system, SATEON, during the year and version
2.6 will be released later this year. The pipeline for SATEON continues to grow and includes upgrades for our legacy
system JANUS. JANUS was the main sales offering when the Group acquired Grosvenor Technology Limited and
has continued over the years to be very successful. JANUS still works very efficiently and is used at thousands of
sites including many major corporate clients and the Board believes that JANUS will continue to be sold for many
years to come. There have obviously been a number of upgrades during the intervening years but the changing
world of technology and security requirements resulted in our decision to develop SATEON. Despite the overall
improvement  in  Group  profitability  in  the  year,  IAS36  requires  that  the  carrying  value  of  intangible  assets  be
considered in the light of each separable cash generating unit. As a consequence of the above and the resultant
forward projections, the Directors have reviewed the carrying values of the original goodwill that arose from the
acquisition of Grosvenor Technology Limited and an impairment provision of £1,791k is required which has been
charged to administrative expenses in the income statement.
Profit from operations for the year as shown in the income statement after the provisions described above was
£202k  (2012:  £189k).  Profit  from  operations  for  the  year  before  the  impairment  provisions  was  £2,476k  (2012:
before impairment provision and legal costs £559k).
The Board was delighted to announce the appointment of Marie Claire Dwek as Chief Executive Officer on 12 April
2013 and look forward to the growth of the Company under her stewardship during the years ahead. Nick Medlam
resigned as a director on 15 June 2013 to pursue other interests and the Board wishes to express its thanks for all
his efforts and contributions to the Group over the years.
Earnings per share are shown in the income statement as 0.03 pence (2012: 0.04 pence). However, the earnings
per share before impairment review provisions and legal costs are 0.54 pence (2012: 0.12 pence) as calculated in
note 8 to the accounts.
Revenue per employee increased from £99,954 to £136,687.
The Board believes that the OEM division of Grosvenor and Safetell are leaders in their particular markets. There
were no environmental issues having a major impact on the Group in the year.
The Group continues to invest in research and development which the Board is confident will benefit the results
in the future.
A more detailed review of their activities, results and future developments is set out in the divisional results below.

Electronic Division
Revenue £6,615k (2012: £6,039k)

Revenue in the UK and Europe from OEM clocks was 14 per cent. ahead of the previous year, and included several
large projects, one for a major retailer and another for a supermarket chain. We have since negotiated a second larger
contract with the same supermarket which has already been awarded with delivery planned during the current year.
New partners in Eastern Europe are at various stages of integrating their software with our IT Series clocks and
the early converts continue to place orders for IT31’s and IT51’s. Their main interest however is the lower-end IT11
clock which is on schedule for completion with a Q3 2013 release date. The IT11 is a fixed reader unit compared
to  the  IT31  which  accepts  multiple  reader  types  into  the  same  core  product.  The  first  reader  type  to  be
manufactured with the IT11 will be the low cost Mifare proximity technology with other reader technologies such
as the market leading HID proximity to follow.

Newmark Security PLC
3

Total sales in the US of our OEM products were 59 per cent. ahead. We remain confident in this market and expect
significant  improvements  as  more  and  more  partners  complete  their  application  integration  with  the  IT  Series
clocks and incorporate them into their new project installations. Prospects are improving as Grosvenor becomes
more established and respected in the US arena. Interest has also been registered by our US partners in the IT11
clock whilst HID proximity is likely to be the preferred reader interface in this market.
Confidence is high for the long term success of SATEON as a number of project wins have now been achieved with
SATEON being used in the education, manufacturing, transportation, and government sectors.
In the UK a strong pipeline of SATEON projects continues to develop including upgrades for legacy JANUS and
Siteguard systems. These projects will assist SATEON establish itself as a proven product for system upgrades as
well as for new system installations, and encourage increased momentum for take-up of the product. SATEON has
been selected as the new access control system by, amongst others, East Sussex Council, Mitsubishi Electronics,
30 St Mary Axe (“the Gherkin”) and Gateway College, Leicester.
On an international level, progress has been deliberately slower whilst we addressed the expected early software
issues. We are now confident these early issues have been resolved and that we are in a strong position to promote
systems  in  the  knowledge  that  our  site  attendance  will  not  be  necessary  during  installation.  Over  the  coming
months, international activity will be extended and more regions in Europe and the US will be introduced to SATEON.
SATEON version 2.60 is due for release towards the end of 2013 and is another landmark version as it will provide
a comprehensive ‘Enterprise level’ feature set. These features will allow Grosvenor to compete for the larger more
complex projects that require integration with third party systems for example HR and student enrolment systems,
as well as third party Security Management Systems (SMS). SATEON 2.60 will also put Grosvenor in a stronger
position as it will allow faster integration with other third-party CCTV systems as and when project specifications
demand.
A new website www.sateon.com has been launched and has been complimented for its multimedia content which
we intend to focus on for the future. To date, we have translated our most relevant corporate and product video’s
into different languages including Arabic, French, Spanish, Portuguese, and Hindu.

Asset Protection Division
Revenue £11,701k (2012: £7,055k)

Safetell’s sales were 66 per cent. greater than last year mainly due to large orders received from the Post Office
and the supply of Eclipse Rising Screens to a number of financial institutions who were undertaking refurbishment
programmes. Service revenue continued to benefit from long-term service contracts during the year.
The gross profit was higher due to the increased level of sales and the benefit of the new product development
completed last year which increased the margin of products previously sourced from third parties.
Product sales were 176 per cent. higher than the same period last year principally due to the large order received
for time delay cash handling equipment from the Post Office in April 2012. All the cash handling equipment was
supplied,  but  the  installation  in  Post  Office  branches  was  delayed  until  the  third  quarter  and  even  then  the
installations were lower than originally planned.
The new cash handling products developed for a high street bank also resulted in increased sales and our product
offering to banks in general. Orders for new Eclipse Rising Screens and branch reconfiguration work increased by
67 per cent. and we had several long standing customers in retail finance who undertook branch refurbishment
programmes.
Eye2Eye  sales  increased  by  33  per  cent.  as  orders  carried  over  from  the  previous  year  were  completed  but
CounterShield  sales  decreased  by  64  per  cent.  due  to  public  sector  budget  cuts.  Orders  for  Fixed  Glazing  and
Counter  Protection  Systems  increased  by  22  per  cent.  as  we  continued  to  receive  orders  from  long  standing
customers and also benefitted from new projects.
Service sales were in line with the previous year’s turnover excluding the one off security contract received last
year. Margins improved by 2.7 per cent. in the year as a result of cost control and the continuation of our policy
of examining and delivering a more effective service. Delivery has been excellent in the year and we have met the
targets set by our blue chip customer base. Contract retention remained high and the Service Division retains our
dominant position as the UK’s largest rising screen service provider. We shall shortly commence negotiations to
renew  two  large  service  contracts  due  to  expire  in  2014,  and  we  are  currently  in  negotiations  for  the  support
contract of the Post Office Network Transformation programme which would provide a significant revenue stream
in future years.
The development of the new design Cash Transit Case is progressing satisfactorily and we resumed trials with
Loomis  in  May.  Due  to  the  competitive  nature  of  the  Cash  in  Transit  industry  we  have  to  contend  with  ever

Newmark Security PLC
4

increasing procedural changes and this has resulted in requirements to make alterations to the Cash Transit Case
on a regular basis. Initial talks with other cash in transit and related businesses were encouraging and they have
shown interest in the product and further meetings will follow.

Balance sheet and cash flow
Cash  flow  from  operating  activities  increased  in  the  year  from  £2.1  million  to  £3.0  million  as  a  result  of  the
increased profitability in the year. The improved cash position meant that the invoice discount facility was not
being used in the latter part of the year, amount drawndown at April 2012 being £0.5 million. Tight credit control
was maintained again so that there were no significant bad debts in the year.

Cash outflow from investing activities at £1.5 million was higher than the previous year (£1.3 million) with the
continuation  of  the  Group’s  development  programme  and  the  purchase  of  a  further  26.7  per  cent.  of  ATM
Protection (UK) Limited.

Cash outflow from financing activities was £0.5 million (2012: £0.4 million) with the repayment of the loan notes
which had been drawndown during the previous year.

Key Financial Risks of the Group
Details of the Group’s financial risks are given in note 18 to the financial statements on page 32.

Key Business Risks of the Group
Competition and client relationships

The Group invests in developing new products to remain competitive by offering customers the most advanced
quality  products.  The  Group  also  provides  support  services  to  maintain  products.  The  strength  of  the  Group’s
relationship with clients is dependent to a large part on its performance under its support services with them. If
a client is not satisfied with the Group’s services it may terminate or decide not to renew their contracts. The
Group responds promptly to queries to reduce the risk of losing customers and also has an excellent record of
staff retention. It is essential that high quality staff are recruited and then retained if client relationships are to
be maintained and new customers won.

Development costs
As described above, the Group does incur development expenditure and there is a risk that a development may
not be completed successfully or that the sales of the product will generate sufficient future economic benefit.

General demand for services
If economic conditions deteriorate, there is a risk that the Group may face reduced demand from its clients for its
services. To mitigate this risk the Group focuses on diversifying its customer base in terms of business sectors and
industry  sectors.  To  mitigate  the  credit  risk  further  and  reduce  exposure  to  potential  bad  debts,  the  Group
maintains credit insurance policies and senior management review credit limits on a regular basis.

Employees
The Board would like to thank all the staff for their efforts, which are reflected in the improved trading results for
the year.

Dividend
The Board is recommending the payment of a dividend for the year ended 30 April 2013 of 0.0333 pence (2012:
Nil pence per share).

Outlook
The Board is delighted that it has been able to reintroduce a recommendation for the payment of a dividend for
the year. A trading update was issued in June this year in view of the increased levels of trading that the Group
was experiencing from a number of contracts. As stated both at the time and in previous years, the timing of these
contracts is dependent upon our customer requirements and therefore turnover can vary significantly year on
year.  In  view  of  the  very  high  sales  experienced  last  year,  the  Board  does  not  expect  the  same  volumes  to  be
repeated in the current year but does anticipate another successful year.

M DWEK
Chairman

30 July 2013

Newmark Security PLC
5

REPORT OF THE DIRECTORS
The Directors submit their annual report and audited financial statements of the Group for the year ended 30 April
2013.

Principal activities
The Group is principally engaged in the design, manufacture and supply of products and services for the security
of assets and personnel. The principal activity of the Company is that of an investment holding company.

Financial results and dividends
The  profit  from  operations  on  continuing  activities  before  interest and tax in  the  year  was  £202,000 (2012:
£189,000). The  profit  from  operations  for  the  year  before  impairment  provisions  was  £2,476,000  (2012:  Before
legal costs and impairment provisions £549,000).

The profit for the year was £140,000 (2012: £177,000).

Turnover for the year for continuing operations was £18.3 million (2012: £13.1 million). A review of the business
and future prospects is given in the Chairman’s Statement on pages 3 to 5.

The Board is proposing a dividend of 0.0333p per share (2012: nil p per share).

Directors
The Directors who served during the year were as follows:
M Dwek
M C Dwek
B Beecraft
M Rapoport
N Medlam
D Blethyn
R Waddington

N Medlam resigned as a director 15 July 2013

Details of the Directors’ service contracts are shown in the Report of the Remuneration Committee on page 10.

M Dwek and D Blethyn retire in accordance with the articles of association. M Dwek and D Blethyn being eligible,
offer themselves for re-election at the next annual general meeting.

Share capital
Full details of changes to the share capital in the year are given in note 22 to the financial statements on page 38.

Financial instruments
For full details of changes to the Group’s management of its financial instruments, please refer to note 18 to the
financial statements on pages 32 to 36.

Directors
Directors’ interests
The beneficial and other interests of the Directors in the shares of the Company as at 1 May 2012 (or the date of
their appointment to the Board, if later) and 30 April 2013 were as follows:

M Dwek(a)
M Rapoport
N Medlam

Percentage
holding at

30 April 2013 30 April 2013
59,099,467
14,055,000
1,500,000

13.1%
3.1%
0.4%

1 May 2012
(or date of
appointment
if later)
59,099,467
10,555,000
1,500,000

(a)

These shares are held in the name of Arbury Inc., 51 per cent. of the equity share capital of which is, at the date of this report, beneficially
owned by M Dwek.

Since  30 April  2013,  M Rapoport  has  acquired  a  further  1,500,000  so  that  his  current  holding  is  15,555,000
Ordinary Shares representing 3.3 per cent. of the total share capital of the Company.

Newmark Security PLC
6

The interests of Directors in Share Option Schemes operated by the Company at 1 May 2012 (or the date of their
appointment to the Board, if later) and 2013 were as follows:

Number of
Ordinary
Shares under
the
Unapproved
Scheme
30 April 2013 30 April 2013 30 April 2013

Number of
Ordinary
Shares under
the Approved
Scheme

Number of
Ordinary
Shares under
the EMI
Scheme

Number of
Ordinary
Shares under
the EMI
Scheme
1 May 2012

Number of
Ordinary
Shares under
the Approved
Scheme
1 May 2012

Number of
Ordinary
Shares under
the
Unapproved
Scheme
1 May 2012

(or date of appointment if later)

M Dwek
B Beecraft
D Blethyn

–
1,000,000
1,000,000

–
–
2,000,000

–
3,000,000
3,000,000

–
1,000,000
1,000,000

–
125,000
2,000,000

5,000,000
3,625,000
3,000,000

The Directors had no other interests in the shares or share options of the Company or its subsidiaries.

Research and development
The Group is committed to on-going research and development. The strategy is based upon market demand to
meet  identified  security  needs  in  conjunction  with  a  commercial  assessment  of  the  short  to  medium  term
profitability of each project.

Employee involvement
The  Group  keeps  employees  informed  of  matters  affecting  them  and  employees  have  regular  opportunities  to
meet and have discussions with their managers.

Share option schemes
The Company had three employee share option schemes which enable employees and Executive Directors to be
granted  options  to  subscribe  for  Ordinary  Shares,  HM  Revenue  &  Custom’s  Approved  and  Unapproved  Share
Option Schemes and HM Revenue & Custom’s EMI Share Option Plan.

The Approved Scheme was approved by the Inland Revenue in accordance with Section 185 of, and Schedule 9 to,
the Income and Corporation Taxes Act 1988 (“Taxes Act“), the Unapproved Scheme not requiring such approval.
The Schemes required that exercise of options be subject to the satisfaction of certain performance criteria.

Both the Approved and Unapproved Schemes expired in April 2007 on the tenth anniversary of the formation of
these schemes. However the options granted under these schemes will only lapse ten years after the date the
options were granted.

The Newmark Security PLC EMI Share Option Plan enables the Board to grant qualifying share options under the
HM Revenue & Custom’s Enterprise Management Incentive (“EMI”) tax code and also unapproved share options to
employees and directors.

The Remuneration Committee has administered and operated each scheme. Further details of the share option
schemes are set out in note 25 to the financial statements on page 40.

Environmental Policy
The Group’s environmental policy endeavours to minimise the impact of its activities on the environment through,
where possible, the proper conservation of natural resources. The Group recognises its responsibility to continually
review and improve its environmental performance and, in doing so, seeks the input of architects, engineers and
other professional advisers.

Payment of suppliers
The  Group  requires  its  operational  management  to  settle  terms  of  payment  with  suppliers  when  agreeing  the
terms of the transaction to ensure that suppliers are aware of these terms and to abide by them. Group trade
creditors at the year end were 28 days (2012: 42 days) of average supplies for the period. The parent company
does not trade and therefore there is no corresponding company only figure.

Newmark Security PLC
7

Corporate governance
The Group has applied the principles of the Combined Code as far as practicable for a group of its size. The Code
only applies mandatorily to fully listed companies.

At 30 April 2013, the Board comprised a Chairman, two Executive Directors and three Non-Executive Directors.

The Board meets regularly to exercise full and effective control over the Group. The Board has a number of matters
reserved for its consideration, with the principal responsibilities being to monitor performance and to ensure that
there are proper internal controls in place, to agree overall strategy and acquisition policy, to approve major capital
expenditure and to review budgets. The Board will also consider reports from senior members of the management
team. The Chairman takes responsibility for the conduct of the Group and overall strategy.

Under  the  Company’s  Articles  of  Association,  the  appointment  of  all  directors  must  be  approved  by  the
shareholders in General Meeting, and additionally one-third of the directors are required to submit themselves for
re-election at each Annual General Meeting. Additionally, each director has undertaken to submit themselves for
re-election at least every three years. The Board has considered the recommendation to introduce a Nominations
Committee. However, it was decided, given the small size of the Board, that nominations are to remain a matter
reserved for the Board.

Any  Director  may,  in  furtherance  of  his  duties,  take  independent  professional  advice  where  necessary,  at  the
expense of the Company. All directors have access to the Company Secretary whose appointment and removal is
a  matter  for  the  Board  as  a  whole,  and  who  is  responsible  to  the  Board  as  a  whole for  ensuring  that  agreed
procedures and applicable rules are observed.

The  Company  maintains  an  ongoing  dialogue  with  its  institutional  shareholders.  The  Combined  Code  requires
proxy votes to be counted and announced after any vote on a show of hands and this has been implemented by
the Company.

The Combined Code requires Directors to review, and report to shareholders on the Group’s system of internal
control. In September 1999 guidance to this requirement was provided to Directors by the publication of Internal
Control: Guidance for Directors on the Combined Code (“The Turnbull Report”).

The Board continues to report on internal financial control in accordance with the guidance on internal control
and financial reporting that was issued by the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales in 1994.

The Directors have considered the Turnbull Report but have decided that the cost of implementing the procedures
contained therein is disproportionate to expected benefits at this stage of the Group’s development.

The  Directors  acknowledge  their  responsibility  for  the  Group’s  systems  of  internal  financial  control  which  are
designed to provide reasonable but not absolute assurance that the assets of the Group are safeguarded and that
transactions are properly authorised and recorded.

During the year, key controls were:

•

•

•

•

•

day to day supervision of the business by the Executive Directors,

maintaining a clear organisational structure with defined lines of responsibility,

production of management information, with comparisons against budget,

maintaining the quality and integrity of personnel,

Board approval of all significant capital expenditure, and all acquisitions.

Each Group company is responsible for the preparation of a budget for the following year, which is presented to
and required to be agreed by the Board before the beginning of that year. The subsidiary is required to report
actual performance against that plan each month.

The  Board  has  established  two  standing  committees,  the Audit  and Remuneration Committees, comprising
independent Non-Executive Directors. Each committee has written terms of reference.

The Audit Committee, now comprising R Waddington and M Dwek, is responsible for the appointment of external
auditors,  reviewing  the  interim  and  annual  financial  results,  considering  matters  raised  by  the  auditors  and
reviewing the internal control systems operated by the Group.

The Remuneration Committee, now comprising M Rapoport, M Dwek and R Waddington meets at least once a year
to review the terms and conditions of employment of Executive Directors including the provision of incentives and
performance related benefits. The report of the Remuneration Committee is set out on page 10.

Newmark Security PLC
8

After  making  enquiries,  the  Directors  believe  that  the  Group  has  sufficient  financial  resources  to  continue  in
operational existence for the foreseeable future. The accounts have therefore been produced on a going concern
basis.

Website Publication
The Directors are responsible for ensuring the annual report and financial statements are made available on a
website. Financial statements are published on the Group’s website in accordance with legislation in the United
Kingdom governing the preparation and dissemination of financial statements, which may vary from legislation
in other jurisdictions. The maintenance and integrity of the Group’s website is the responsibility of the Directors.
The Directors’ responsibility also extends to the ongoing integrity of the financial statements contained therein.

Directors’ responsibilities
The Directors are responsible for preparing the director’s report and the financial statements in accordance with
applicable law and regulations.

Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial statements for each financial year. Under that law the
directors  have  elected  to  prepare  the  Group  financial  statements  in  accordance  with  International  Financial
Reporting  Standards  (IFRSs)  as  adopted  by  the  European  Union  and  the  Company  financial  statements  in
accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards
and applicable law). Under company law the Directors must not approve the financial statements unless they are
satisfied that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Group and Company and of the profit or
loss of the Group for that period. The Directors are also required to prepare financial statements in accordance
with  the  rules  of  the  London  Stock  Exchange  for  companies  trading  securities  on  the  Alternative  Investment
Market.

In preparing these financial statements, the Directors are required to:

•

•

•

•

•

select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;

make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent;

state whether the Group financial statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by
the European Union, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements;

for  the  Company  financial  statements,  state  whether  applicable  UK  Accounting  Standards  have  been
followed; and

prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis unless it is inappropriate to presume that the
Group and Company will continue in business.

The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and explain the
company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time the financial position of the company
and enable them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the requirements of the Companies Act
2006. They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the company and hence for taking reasonable steps
for the prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.

All of the current directors have taken all the steps that they ought to have taken to make themselves aware of
any  information  needed  by  the  Company’s  auditors  for  the  purposes  of  their  audit  and  to  establish  that  the
auditors are aware of that information. The directors are not aware of any relevant audit information of which the
auditors are unaware.

Auditors
A resolution to reappoint BDO LLP as auditors will be proposed at the next annual general meeting.

By order of the Board

B BEECRAFT
Company Secretary

30 July 2013

Newmark Security PLC
9

REPORT OF THE REMUNERATION COMMITTEE

Authority
The  Remuneration  Committee  is  responsible  for  approving  the  remuneration  of  Executive  Directors.  The
remuneration of Non-Executive Directors is approved by the full Board of the Company.

Membership
The  majority  membership  of  the  Remuneration  Committee  is  required  to  comprise  independent  Non-Executive
Directors  and  at  30 April  2013 comprised three existing  Non-Executive  Directors,  Maurice  Dwek  and  Michel
Rapoport and Robert Waddington.

Maurice Dwek was chairman and co-founded Dwek Group plc in 1963, a company which was listed on the London
Stock  Exchange  in  1973  before  the  company  was  sold  to  a  management  buy-out  team.  He  was  subsequently
chairman of Arlen plc and Owen & Robinson plc before concentrating on Newmark in 1997.

Michel  Rapoport  was  previously  President  and  Chief  Executive  Officer  of  Mosler  Inc.,  a  manufacturer  and
integrator  of  security  systems  for  banking,  industrial  and  commercial  organisations.  Prior  to  that  he  was  Vice
President of Pitney Bowes International and Chairman of Pitney Bowes France. He is President and Chief Executive
Officer of LII Holdings, Inc., a holding company based in Atlanta, Georgia USA.

Robert Waddington is a chartered accountant who has worked for many years in investment banking and has
experience  of  the  betting  and  gaming,  property  investment  and  engineering  industries  through  his  past
non-executive directorships.

Remuneration policy
The Group’s policy is to offer remuneration packages which are appropriate to the experience, qualifications and
level of responsibility of each Executive Director and are in line with directors of comparable public companies.

Service and consultancy agreements
The  Company  entered  into  a  consultancy  agreement  with  Arbury  Inc.  on  1  September  1997  for  the  services
provided to the Company by Mr Dwek. The agreement may be terminated by either party subject to 12 months’
notice being served. Arbury Inc. is paid a fee in line with the level of responsibilities of Mr Dwek who is also entitled
to the provision of a car for which the Company will meet all running expenses except for lease costs.

The Company entered into a service agreement on 5 June 1998 with Mr Beecraft which may be terminated by
either party serving six months’ notice. This notice period was extended in October 2007 to a period of 12 months.

The Company entered into a service agreement on 12 April 2013 with Ms M C Dwek which may be terminated by
either party serving twelve months’ notice.

Director’s emoluments
Emoluments of the directors (including pension contributions) of the Company during the year ended 30 April
2013 were as follows:

Executive Directors
M C Dwek
B Beecraft
D Blethyn(a)
Non-Executive Directors
M Dwek(b)
M Rapoport
N Medlam
R Waddington
M C Dwek

2012

Consultancy/
management
agreement
£’000

–
–
–

Salary
£’000

8
133
169

Fees
£’000

Expenses
£’000

–
–
–

–
–
–

Total
£’000

8
133
169

Pension
contributions
£’000

–
–
–

–
–
–
–
–

–
25
25
25
24

134
–
–
–
–

–
–
–
–
–
———— ———— ———— ———— ———— ————
–
———— ———— ———— ———— ———— ————
–
———— ———— ———— ———— ———— ————

———— ———— ———— ———— ———— ————
———— ———— ———— ———— ———— ————

139
25
25
25
24

5
–
–
–
–

134

548

421

291

310

75

99

55

5

–

The directors’ share interests are detailed in the Report of the Directors on pages 7 and 8.

(a)

(b)

The emoluments of D Blethyn relate to his services as a director of Grosvenor Technology Limited for the year ended 30 April 2013.

The Company paid a consultancy fee of £134,015 (2012: £75,000) to Arbury Inc., a company 51 per cent. owned by M Dwek which covers
salary, pension and car benefits, and included a bonus of £35,000 (2012: £Nil).

Newmark Security PLC
10

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT

TO THE MEMBERS OF NEWMARK SECURITY PLC

We  have  audited  the  financial  statements  of  Newmark  Security  Plc  for  the  year  ended  30  April  2013,  which
comprise  the  group  statement  of  financial  position  and  parent  company  balance  sheet,  the  group  income
statement,  the  group  statement  of  comprehensive  income,  the  group  statement  of  cash  flows,  the  group
statement of changes in equity and the related notes. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in
the  preparation  of  the  group  financial  statements  is  applicable  law  and  International  Financial  Reporting
Standards (IFRSs) as adopted by the European Union. The financial reporting framework that has been applied in
preparation  of  the  parent  company  financial  statements  is  applicable  law  and  United  Kingdom  Accounting
Standards (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice).

This report is made solely to the company’s members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the
Companies Act 2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the company’s members those
matters we are required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent
permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the company and the company’s
members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.

Respective responsibilities of directors and auditors
As  explained  more  fully  in  the  statement  of  directors’  responsibilities,  the  directors  are  responsible  for  the
preparation  of  the  financial  statements  and  for  being  satisfied  that  they  give  a  true  and  fair  view.  Our
responsibility is to audit and express an opinion on the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and
International  Standards  on  Auditing  (UK  and  Ireland).  Those  standards  require  us  to  comply  with  the  Auditing
Practices Board’s Ethical Standards for Auditors.

Scope of the audit of the financial statements
A description of the scope of an audit of financial statements is provided on the Financial Reporting Council’s
website at www.frc.org.uk/auditscopeukprivate.

Opinion on financial statements
In our opinion:

•

•

•

•

the financial statements give a true and fair view of the state of the group’s and the parent company’s affairs
as at 30 April 2013 and of the group’s loss for the year then ended;

the group financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the
European Union;

the parent company financial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom
Generally Accepted Accounting Practice; and

the  financial  statements  have  been  prepared  in  accordance  with  the  requirements  of  the  Companies  Act
2006; and, as regards the group financial statements, Article 4 of the IAS Regulation.

Opinion on other matters prescribed by the Companies Act 2006
In our opinion:

•

the information given in the directors’ report for the financial year for which the financial statements are
prepared is consistent with the financial statements.

Matters on which we are required to report by exception
We have nothing to report in respect of the following:

Under the Companies Act 2006 we are required to report to you if, in our opinion:

•

adequate accounting records have not been kept by the parent company, or returns adequate for our audit
have not been received from branches not visited by us; or

Newmark Security PLC
11

•

•

•

the parent company financial statements are not in agreement with the accounting records and returns; or

certain disclosures of directors’ remuneration specified by law are not made; or

we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit.

Andrew Stickland (senior statutory auditor)
For and on behalf of BDO LLP, statutory auditor

Gatwick
United Kingdom

30 July 2013

BDO LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales (with registered number OC305127).

Newmark Security PLC
12

2013
£’000
18,316
(10,921)

2012
£’000
13,094
(7,826)
———— ————
5,268

7,395

(7,193)

(5,079)
———— ————
559
(176)
(194)

2,476
(1,791)
(483)

140

71
69

202
(131)

189
(127)
———— ————
62
115
———— ————
177
———— ————

177
———— ————

———— ————
———— ————
———— ————
———— ————

0.04p
———— ————

0.04p
———— ————

0.03p

0.03p

140

CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT
for the year ended 30 April 2013

Revenue
Cost of sales – including exceptional development cost impairment

Gross profit

Administrative expenses – including exceptional goodwill impairment

provision (2012: legal costs)

Note
2

Profit from operations before exceptional items
Exceptional goodwill impairment (2012: Exceptional legal costs)
Exceptional impairment development costs

10 & 11
10 & 11

Profit from operations
Finance costs

Profit before tax
Tax credit

Profit for the year

Attributable to:
– Equity holders of the parent

Earnings per share
– Basic (pence)

– Diluted (pence)

All amounts relate to continuing activities.

3
6

7

23

8

8

The notes on pages 18 to 41 form part of these financial statements.

Newmark Security PLC
13

2013
£’000
140
7

2012
£’000
177
–
———— ————
177
———— ————

———— ————
———— ————

177
———— ————

147

147

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
for the year ended 30 April 2013

Profit for the year
Foreign exchange gains on retranslation of overseas operations

Total comprehensive income for the year

Attributable to:
– Equity holders of the parent

Newmark Security PLC
14

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
at 30 April 2013
Company number: 3339998

Note

2013
£’000

2012
£’000

ASSETS
Non-current assets
Property, plant and equipment
Intangible assets

Total non-current assets

Current assets
Inventories
Trade and other receivables
Cash and cash equivalents

Total current assets

Total assets
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables
Other short term borrowings
Corporation tax liability
Provisions

Total current liabilities

Non-current liabilities
Long term borrowings
Provisions
Deferred tax

Total non-current liabilities

Total liabilities

TOTAL NET ASSETS

Capital and reserves attributable to equity 

holders of the company

Share capital
Share premium reserve
Merger reserve
Foreign exchange difference reserve
Retained earnings

Non-controlling interest

TOTAL EQUITY

9
10

13
14

15
16

20

17
20
21

22
23
23
23
23

809
9,092

709
10,699
———— ————
11,408
———— ————

9,901

1,344
2,588
1,128

1,520
2,373
2,100
———— ————
5,993
———— ————
17,401

14,961

5,060

3,071
294
50
129

3,535
2,147
4
81
———— ————
5,767
———— ————

3,544

468

184
84
200

424
84
324
———— ————
832
———— ————
6,599
———— ————
10,802
———— ————

———— ————

10,949

4,012

4,504
502
801
(168)
5,270

4,504
502
801
(175)
5,130
———— ————
10,762
40
———— ————
10,802
———— ————

———— ————

10,909
40

10,949

The financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors and authorised for issue on 30 July 2013.

M Dwek
Director

The notes on pages 18 to 41 form part of these financial statements.

Newmark Security PLC
15

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
for the year ended 30 April 2013

Cash flow from operating activities
Net profit after tax
Adjustments for:
Depreciation, amortisation and impairment
Interest expense
Income tax credit

Note

9 & 10
6
7

Operating cash flows before changes in working 

capital

(Increase)/decrease in trade and other receivables
Decrease/(increase) in inventories
(Decrease)/increase in trade and other payables

Cash generated from operations
Income taxes (paid)/received

Cash flows from operating activities
Cash flow from investing activities
Payments for property, plant & equipment
Sale of property, plant & equipment
Capitalised development expenditure
Purchase of shares in subsidiary

Cash flow from financing activities
Proceeds loan notes
Repayment loan notes
Repayment of bank loans
Repayment of finance lease creditors
Dividends paid
Interest paid

Increase in cash and cash equivalents

10

6

27

2013
£’000

140

3,185
131
(69)
————

3,387
(215)
176
(379)
————

(249)
21
(1,239)
(50)
————

–
(105)
(149)
(152)
–
(131)
————

2013
£’000

2,969
(9)
————
2,960

(1,517)

(537)
————
906
————

————

2012
£’000

177

913
127
(115)
————

1,102
403
(51)
568
————

(136)
1
(1,131)
–
————

105
–
(96)
(134)
(125)
(127)
————

2012
£’000

2,022
92
————
2,114

(1,266)

(377)
————
471
————

————

The notes on pages 18 to 41 form part of these financial statements.

Newmark Security PLC
16

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

1 May 2011
Dividends (note 23)
Total comprehensive

income

30 April 2012

1 May 2012
Dividends (note 23)
Total comprehensive

income

30 April 2013

Share
capital
£’000
4,504
–

Share
premium
£’000
502
–

Merger
reserve
£’000
801
–

Foreign
exchange
reserve
£’000
(175)
–

Retained Minority
interest
earnings
£’000
£’000
40
5,078
–
(125)

Total
equity
£’000
10,750
(125)

–

–

177
———— ———— ———— ———— ———— ———— ————
10,802
———— ———— ———— ———— ———— ———— ————

———— ———— ———— ———— ———— ———— ————

5,130

4,504

(175)

177

502

801

40

–

–

–

4,504
–

502
–

801
–

(175)
–

5,130
–

40
–

10,802
–

–

–

147
———— ———— ———— ———— ———— ———— ————
10,949
———— ———— ———— ———— ———— ———— ————

———— ———— ———— ———— ———— ———— ————

4,504

5,270

(168)

140

502

801

40

–

7

–

Newmark Security PLC
17

NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
for the year ended 30 April 2013

Accounting policies

1.
Newmark  Security  PLC  (the  “Company”)  is  a  public  limited  company  domiciled  in  England.  The  consolidated
financial statements of the Company for the year ended 30 April 2013 comprise the Company and its subsidiaries
(together referred to as the “Group”).

Basis of preparation
The principal accounting policies adopted in the preparation of the financial statements are set out below. The
policies have been consistently applied to all the years presented, unless otherwise stated.
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards (IFRSs) and its interpretations (IFRICs) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB)
and with those parts of the Companies Act 2006 applicable to companies preparing their accounts under IFRS.
The  preparation  of  financial  statements  in  conformity  with  IFRSs  requires  management  to  make  judgements,
estimates and assumptions that affect the application of policies and reported amounts of income and expenses,
and assets and liabilities. These judgements and assumptions are based on historical experience and various other
factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the result of which form the basis of making
the judgements about carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates.
These estimates and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis. Any revisions to the accounting
estimates are recognised in the period in which the revision is made.
The Company has elected to prepare its parent company financial statements in accordance with UK GAAP. These
are presented on pages 42 to 46.
The following principal accounting policies have been applied consistently in the preparation of these financial
statements:

New standards, interpretations and amendments effective from 1 May 2012
The new standards, interpretations and amendments, effective from 1 May 2012, have not had a material effect
on the financial statements.

Standards and Interpretations to Existing Standards that are not yet effective and have not been adopted early by
the Group
The amendments and interpretations to published standards that have an effective date on or after 1 May 2012 or
later periods have not been adopted early by the Group and are not expected to materially affect the Group when
they do come into effect.

Segment reporting
Operating  segments  are  reported  in  a  manner  consistent  with  the  internal  reporting  provided  to  the  chief
operating  decision-maker.  The  chief  operating  decision-maker  has  been  identified  as  the  management  team
including the Chairman and Group Finance Director.

Revenue
Revenue is stated net of value added tax. Sales of equipment including hardware and software are recognised
when the customer takes legal ownership. Service, maintenance and licence revenue is spread evenly over the term
of the contract and the proportion of such related to the period after 30 April is included within deferred income
on the balance sheet. Other sales include installation and refurbishment work which are recognised on completion
of work.

Basis of consolidation
Where the company has the power, either directly or indirectly, to govern the financial and operating policies of
another  entity  or  business  so  as  to  obtain  benefits  from  its  activities,  it  is  classified  as  a  subsidiary.  The
consolidated financial statements present the results of the Group as if it formed a single entity. Intercompany
transactions and balances between group companies are therefore eliminated in full.

Business combinations
The  consolidated  financial  statements  incorporate  the  results  of  business  combinations  using  the  purchase
method.  In  the  consolidated  statement  of  financial  position,  the  acquiree’s  identifiable  assets,  liabilities  and
contingent liabilities are initially recognised at their fair values at the acquisition date. The results of subsidiaries

Newmark Security PLC
18

acquired or disposed of during the year are included in the consolidated income statement from the effective date
of acquisition or up to the effective date of disposal as appropriate.

Goodwill
Goodwill  represents  the  excess  of  the  cost  of  a  business  combination  over  the  interest  in  the  fair  value  of
identifiable  assets,  liabilities  and  contingent  liabilities  acquired.  Cost  comprises  the  fair  values  of  assets  given,
liabilities assumed and equity instruments issued, plus any direct costs of acquisition.

Goodwill is capitalised as an intangible asset with any impairment in carrying value being charged to the income
statement.

Where the fair value of identifiable assets, liabilities and contingent liabilities exceed the fair value of consideration
paid, the excess is credited in full to the income statement.

Impairment of non-financial assets
Impairment tests on goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite useful economic lives are undertaken
annually on 30 April. Where the carrying value of an asset exceeds its recoverable amount (ie the higher of value
in  use  and  fair  value  less  costs  to  sell),  the  asset  is  written  down  accordingly.  In  assessing  value  in  use,  the
estimated future cash flows are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects the
current market assessment of the time value of money and risk specific to the asset.

Where it is not possible to estimate the recoverable amount of an individual asset, the impairment test is carried
out on the asset’s cash-generating unit (ie the lowest group of assets in which the asset belongs for which there
are separately identifiable cash flows). Goodwill is allocated on initial recognition to each of the Group’s cash-
generating units that are expected to benefit from the synergies of the combination giving rise to the goodwill.

Impairment charges are included in the administrative expenses line item in the income statement. An impairment
loss in respect of goodwill is not reversed. In respect of other assets, an impairment loss is reversed if there has
been a change in the estimates used to determine the recoverable amount. An impairment loss is reversed only to
the  extent  that  the  asset’s  carrying  amount  does  not  exceed  the  carrying  amount  that  would  have  been
determined, net of depreciation or amortisation, if no impairment had been recognised.

In  testing  for  impairment,  management  has  to  make  judgements  and  estimates  about  future  events  which  are
uncertain.  Adverse  results  compared  to  these  judgements  could  alter  the  decision  of  whether  an  impairment  is
required.

Foreign currency
The consolidated financial statements are presented in sterling, which is the Group’s functional and presentation
currency.

Transactions  entered  into  by  Group  entities  in  a  currency  other  than  the  functional  currency  of  the  primary
economic environment in which it operates are recorded at the rates ruling when the transactions occur. Foreign
currency  monetary  assets  and  liabilities  are  translated  at  the  rates  ruling  at  the  balance  sheet  date.  Exchange
differences  arising  on  the  retranslation  of  unsettled  monetary  assets  and  liabilities  are  similarly  recognised
immediately  in  the  income  statement,  except  for  foreign  currency  borrowings  qualifying  as  a  hedge  of  a  net
investment in a foreign operation.

The  results  and  financial  position  of  all  Group  companies  that  have  a  functional  currency  different  from  the
presentation currency are translated into the presentation currency as follows:

(i)

(ii)

assets and liabilities are translated at the closing rate at the date of the balance sheet;

income and expenses are translated at average exchange rates; and

(iii)

all resulting exchange differences are recognised as a separate component of equity.

At  the  date  of  the  transition  to  IFRS  the  cumulative  translation  differences  for  foreign  operations  have  been
deemed to be zero.

On  disposal  of  a  foreign  operation,  the  cumulative  exchange  differences  recognised  in  the  foreign  exchange
reserve relating to that operation up to the date of disposal are transferred to the income statement as part of
the profit or loss on disposal.

Financial assets
Loans and receivables: These assets are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments that are
not quoted in an active market. They arise principally through the provision of goods and services to customers (trade
receivables), but also incorporate other types of contractual monetary asset. They are carried at amortised cost.

Newmark Security PLC
19

Financial assets are not derecognised until the associated risks and rewards are transferred or extinguished.

Other financial liabilities: Other financial liabilities include the following items:
•

Trade  payables  and  other  short-term  monetary  liabilities,  which  are  initially  recognised  at  fair  value  and
subsequently at amortised cost.

•

Bank borrowings, loan notes and invoice discounting arrangements are initially recognised at fair value. Such
interest  bearing  liabilities  are  subsequently  measured  at  amortised  cost  using  the  effective  interest  rate
method, which ensures that any interest expense over the period to repayment is at a constant rate on the
balance  of  the  liability  carried  in  the  balance  sheet.  “Interest  expense”  in  this  context  includes  initial
transaction costs, as well as any interest or coupon payable while the liability is outstanding.

Share-based payments
Where share options are awarded to employees, the fair value of the options at the date of grant is charged to
the income statement over the vesting period. Equity settled share options are recognised with a corresponding
credit to equity.

Non-market vesting conditions are taken into account by adjusting the number of equity instruments expected to
vest at each balance sheet date so that, ultimately, the cumulative amount recognised over the vesting period is
based on the number of options that eventually vest. Market vesting conditions are factored into the fair value of
the options granted. As long as all other vesting conditions are satisfied, a charge is made irrespective of whether
the market vesting conditions are satisfied. The cumulative expense is not adjusted for failure to achieve a market
vesting condition.

Leased assets
Where substantially all of the risks and rewards incidental to ownership of a leased asset have been transferred
to the Group (a “finance lease”), the asset is treated as if it had been purchased outright. The amount initially
recognised as an asset is the fair value, or if lower, the present value of the minimum lease payments payable over
the term of the lease. The corresponding lease commitment is shown as a liability. Lease payments are analysed
between capital and interest. The interest element is charged to the income statement over the period of the lease
and is calculated so that it represents a constant proportion of the lease liability. The capital element reduces the
balance owed to the lessor.

Where substantially all of the risks and rewards incidental to ownership are retained by the lessor (an “operating
lease”), the total rentals payable under the lease are charged to the income statement on a straight-line basis over
the lease term.

The  land  and  buildings  elements  of  property  leases  are  considered  separately  for  the  purposes  of  lease
classification.

Internally generated intangible assets (research and development costs)
Expenditure on research activities is recognised as an expense in the period in which it is incurred.
Expenditure on internally developed products is capitalised if it can be demonstrated that:

•
•
•
•
•
•

it is technically feasible to develop the product for it to be sold;
adequate resources are available to complete the development;
there is an intention to complete and sell the product;
the group is able to sell the product;
sale of the product will generate future economic benefits; and
expenditure on the project can be measured reliably.

Capitalised development costs are amortised over seven years being the period the Group expects to benefit from
selling the products developed. Amortisation is charged from when the asset is ready for use and the expense is
included within the cost of sales line in the income statement.

Development  expenditure  not  satisfying  the  above  criteria  and  expenditure  on  the  research  phase  of  internal
projects are recognised in the income statement as incurred.

Intangible assets
Costs associated with patents, trade marks, copyrights etc. are capitalised as incurred and are amortised over the
expected life of the asset.

Newmark Security PLC
20

Taxation
Income tax expense represents the sum of the tax currently payable and deferred tax.

Current Tax
The tax currently payable is based on taxable profit for the year. Taxable profit differs from profit as reported in
the income statement because it excludes items of income or expense that are taxable or deductible in other years
and it further excludes items that are never taxable or deductible. The Group’s liability for current tax is calculated
using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date.

Deferred taxation
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognised where the carrying amount of an asset or liability in the balance
sheet differs from its tax base, except for differences arising on:

•

•

•

•

the initial recognition of goodwill;

goodwill for which amortisation is not tax deductible;

the initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction which is not a business combination and at the
time of the transaction affects neither accounting nor taxable profit; and

investments in subsidiaries and jointly controlled entities where the group is able to control the timing of
the reversal of the difference and it is probable that the difference will not reverse in the foreseeable future.

Recognition of deferred tax assets is restricted to those instances where it is probable that taxable profit will be
available against which the difference can be utilised.

The amount of the asset or liability is determined using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted
by  the  balance  sheet  date  and  are  expected  to  apply  when  the  deferred  tax  liabilities/(assets)  are
settled/(recovered). Deferred tax balances are not discounted.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when the Group has a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets
and liabilities and the deferred tax assets and liabilities relate to taxes levied by the same tax authority on either:

•

•

the same taxable group company; or

different group entities which intend either to settle current tax assets and liabilities on a net basis, or to
realise the assets and settle the liabilities simultaneously, in each future period in which significant amounts
of deferred tax assets or liabilities are expected to be settled or recovered.

Property, plant and equipment
Items of property, plant and equipment are recognised at cost. As well as the purchase price, cost includes directly
attributable costs and the estimated present value of any future costs of dismantling and removing items. The
corresponding liability is recognised within provisions.

Freehold land is not depreciated. Depreciation is provided on all other items of property, plant and equipment to
write off the carrying value of items over their expected useful economic lives. It is applied at the following rates:

Freehold buildings
Short leasehold improvements
Plant and machinery
Fixtures and fittings
Computer equipment
Motor vehicles

–
–
–
–
–
–

5 per cent. per annum straight line
evenly over the length of the lease
20 per cent. per annum straight line
10-15 per cent. per annum straight line
25-33.3 per cent. per annum straight line
25 per cent. per annum reducing balance

Inventories
Inventories are initially recognised at cost, and subsequently at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost
comprises all costs of purchase, costs of conversion and other costs incurred in bringing the inventories to their
present location and condition.

Weighted average cost is used to determine the cost of ordinarily interchangeable items.

Net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less estimated costs necessary
to make the sale.

Newmark Security PLC
21

Provisions
Provisions  are  recognised  for  liabilities  of  uncertain  timing  or  amount  that  have  arisen  as  a  result  of  past
transactions, where it is probable that the Group will be required to settle the obligation, and a reliable estimate
can be made of the amount of the obligation.

The  amount  recognised  as  a  provision  is  the  best  estimate  of  the  consideration  required  to  settle  the  present
obligation at the balance sheet date, taking into account the risks and uncertainties surrounding the obligation.

Where a provision is measured using the estimated cashflow required to settle the obligation then its carrying
value is the present value of those cashflows.

Onerous  contracts  –  Present  obligations  arising  under  onerous  contacts  are  recognised  and  measured  as  a
provision. An onerous contract is considered to exist where the Group has a contract under which the unavoidable
costs of meeting the obligations under the contract exceed the economic benefits expected to be received under it.

Dilapidations – Dilapidation provisions are provided on leasehold properties where the terms of the lease require
the Group to make good any changes made to the property during the period of the lease. Where a dilapidation
provision is required the Group recognises an asset and provision equal to the discounted cost of restating the
property to its original state. The asset is depreciated over the remaining term of the lease.

Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents in the cash flow statement include cash in hand, deposits held at call with banks, other
short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less, and bank overdrafts. Bank
overdrafts are included in borrowings in current liabilities in the balance sheet.

Borrowing costs
Borrowing costs are recognised as an expense in the period in which they are incurred.

Critical accounting estimates and judgements
The  estimates  and  assumptions  that  have  a  significant  risk  of  causing  a  material  adjustment  to  the  carrying
amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year are discussed below.
(a)

Estimated impairment of goodwill
The Group tests annually whether goodwill has suffered any impairment, in accordance with the accounting
policy  stated  above.  The  recoverable  amounts  of  cash-generating  units  have  been  determined  based  on
value-in-use calculations. These calculations require the use of estimates.
Development  costs  on  internally  developed  products  are  capitalised  if  it  can  be  demonstrated  that  the
expenditure  meets  the  criteria  set  out  above.  These  Costs  are  amortised  over  the  period  that  the  Group
expects  to  benefit  from  selling  the  products  developed.  The  judgements  concerning  compliance  with  the
above criteria and the expected useful life of there assets are made using the historical, commercial and
technical experience of senior members of the management team.
Accounting  estimates  are  applied  in  determining  the  initial  fair  value  of  development  costs  on  business
combinations.

(b)

(c)

Dividends
Dividends  are  recognised  when  they  become  legally  payable.  In  the  case  of  interim  dividends  to  equity
shareholders, this is when declared by the directors. In the case of final dividends, this is when approved by the
shareholders at the AGM.

Revenue
2.
Revenue arises from:

Electronic division
Sale of goods
Provision of services
Asset protection division

Sale of goods
Provision of services

Newmark Security PLC
22

2013
£’000

6,163
452

2012
£’000

5,561
478

8,261
3,440

2,994
4,061
———— ————
13,094
———— ————

———— ————

18,316

Profit from operations

3.
This has been arrived at after charging/(crediting):

Staff costs (note 4)
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
– owned assets
– leased assets
Amortisation of intangible assets
Impairment provision – cost of sales
Impairment provision – administrative expenses
Foreign exchange differences
Operating lease expense
– Plant and machinery
– Property
Auditors remuneration:
Audit fees payable to the company’s auditor for the audit of
Company annual accounts
Group annual accounts
Other fees payable to the Company’s auditors
Subsidiary companies
Tax compliance
(Profit) on disposal of tangible non-current assets

Staff costs

4.
Staff costs (including the Executive Directors) comprise:

Wages and salaries
Short-term non-monetary benefits
Defined contribution pension cost
Employer’s national insurance contributions and similar taxes

2013
£’000
6,211

200
119
592
483
1,791
(59)

43
263

8
10

2012
£’000
6,154

226
113
380
194
–
24

57
294

8
10

57
31
(3)

37
38
(29)
———— ————

———— ————

2013
£’000
5,226
225
157
603

2012
£’000
5,212
200
157
585
———— ————
6,154
———— ————

———— ————

6,211

The average numbers employed (including the Executive Directors) within the following categories were:

Key management remuneration (comprising the Executive Directors and Directors of subsidiary companies):

Management, sales and administration
Production

Salaries
Short-term non-monetary benefits
Defined contribution pension costs
Employers national insurance contributions and similar taxes

2013
No.
45
89

2012
No.
42
89
———— ————
131
———— ————

———— ————

134

2013
£’000
919
41
58
97

2012
£’000
861
44
62
107
———— ————
1,074
———— ————

———— ————

1,115

The emoluments of the Directors of the parent company are set out in the Report of the Remuneration Committee
on page 10.

Newmark Security PLC
23

5.

Segment information

Description of the types of products and services from which each reportable segment derives its revenues
The Group has 2 main reportable segments:

•

•

Electronic division – This division is involved in the design, manufacture and distribution of access-control
systems (hardware and software) and the design, manufacture and distribution of OEM hardware only, for
time-and-attendance,  shop-floor  data  collection,  and  access  control  systems.  This  division  contributed
36 per cent. (2012: 46 per cent.) of the Group’s revenue.

Asset Protection division – This division is involved in the design, manufacture, installation and maintenance
of fixed and reactive security screens, reception counters, cash management systems and associated security
equipment. This division contributed 64 per cent. (2012: 54 per cent.) of the Group’s revenue.

Factors that management used to identify the Group’s reportable segments
The Group’s reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different products and services. The two
divisions are managed separately as each involves different technology, and sales and marketing strategies.

Measurement of operating segment profit or loss from operations before tax not including non-recurring losses
such as goodwill impairment, and also excluding the effects of share based payments.

Segment assets and liabilities exclude group company balances.

Electronic
2013
£’000

Asset
Protection
2013
£’000

Total
2013
£’000

6,615

6,615

11,701

11,701

18,316
———— ———— ————
18,316
———— ———— ————
34
311
592
483
2,688
1,606
9,672
3,692

16
214
–
483
2,468
604
4,207
2,934

18
97
592
–
220
1,002
5,465
758

Electronic
2012
£’000

Asset
Protection
2012
£’000

Total
2012
£’000

7,055

6,039

7,055

6,039

13,094
———— ———— ————
13,094
———— ———— ————
42
332
380
194
732
1,383
10,076
4,060

22
117
380
194
296
1,026
4,583
1,919

20
215
–
–
436
357
5,493
2,141

Revenue
Total revenue

Revenue from external customers

Finance cost
Depreciation
Amortisation
Impairment
Segment profit before income tax
Additions to non-current assets
Reportable segment assets
Reportable segment liabilities

Revenue
Total revenue

Revenue from external customers

Finance cost
Depreciation
Amortisation
Impairment
Segment profit before income tax
Additions to non-current assets
Reportable segment assets
Reportable segment liabilities

Newmark Security PLC
24

Reconciliation of reportable segment revenues, profit or loss, assets and liabilities to the Group’s corresponding
amounts:

2013
£’000

2012
£’000

Revenue
Total revenue for reportable segments

Profit or loss after income tax expense
Total profit or loss for reportable segments
Corporation taxes
Unallocated amounts – other corporate expenses

Profit after income tax expense (continuing activities)

Assets
Total assets for reportable segments
PLC
Goodwill on consolidation

Group’s assets

Liabilities
Total liabilities for reportable segments
PLC
Liabilities of discontinued activities

Group’s liabilities

18,316

13,094
———— ————
2012
£’000

2013
£’000

2,688
69
(2,617)

732
115
(670)
———— ————
177
———— ————
2012
£’000

2013
£’000

140

9,672
208
5,081

10,076
473
6,852
———— ————
17,401
———— ————

14,961

3,692
310
10

4,060
2,536
3
———— ————
6,599
———— ————

4,012

Other material items
Capital expenditure
Depreciation and amortisation
Impairment

Geographical information:

UK
Europe
USA
Other countries

Reportable
segment

totals Adjustments
2013
2013
£’000
£’000

1,606
903
483

73
8
1,791

Group
totals
2013
£’000

1,679
911
2,274

Reportable
segment

totals Adjustments
2012
2012
£’000
£’000

1,383
712
194

9
7
–

Group
totals
2012
£’000

1,392
719
194

External revenue by
location of customers
2012
£’000
11,314
1,034
550
196

Non-current assets
by location of assets
2012
£’000
11,402
–
6
–
———— ———— ———— ————
11,408
———— ———— ———— ————

2013
£’000
16,026
1,209
878
203

2013
£’000
9,876
–
25
–

13,094

18,316

9,901

Newmark Security PLC
25

6.

Finance costs

Finance costs
Bank borrowings
Loan notes
Invoice discounting
Finance leases

7.

Tax expense

2013
£’000

2012
£’000

93
4
18
16

81
4
22
20
———— ————
127
———— ————

———— ————

131

2013
£’000

2013
£’000

2012
£’000

2012
£’000

Current tax expense
Continuing businesses
UK corporation tax on profits for the year
Adjustment for over provision in prior periods

Deferred tax expense
Origination and reversal of temporary differences
Adjustment for over provision in prior periods

Total tax credit

61
11
————

(107)
(34)
————

72

(155)

(250)
95
————

102
(62)
————

(141)
————
(69)
————

————

40
————
(115)
————

————

The reasons for the difference between the actual tax charge for the year and the standard rate of corporation tax
in the UK applied to profits for the year are as follows:

Profit before tax

Expected tax charge based on the standard rate of corporation tax in the UK of
23.92 per cent. (2012: 25.84 per cent.)
Research and development allowances
Effects on profits of other items not deductible for tax purposes
Utilisation and recognition of previously unrecognised tax losses
Losses carried forward
Change in tax rate
Adjustment to tax charge in respect of previous periods
Other

Total tax credit

2013
£’000
71

2012
£’000
62
———— ————

———— ————

17
(441)
595
(281)
56
8
(23)
–

16
(331)
145
(38)
59
13
33
(12)
———— ————
(115)
———— ————

———— ————

(69)

The Group has the following tax losses, subject to agreement by HMRC Inspector of Taxes, available for offset
against future trading profits and capital gains as appropriate:

2013
£’000
1,715
–

2012
£’000
984
1,472
———— ————

———— ————

Management expenses
Trading losses

Newmark Security PLC
26

If the losses were to be recognised this would give rise to deferred tax assets as follows:

Management expenses
Trading losses

8.

Earnings per share

Numerator
Earnings used in basic and diluted EPS – continuing operations

Denominator
Weighted average number of shares used in basic and diluted EPS
– continuing operations

2013
£’000
394
–

2012
£’000
236
353
———— ————

———— ————

2013
£’000

2012
£’000

140

177
———— ————

———— ————

No.

No.

450,432,316 450,432,316
———––— ———––—

————— —————

Certain employee options have been excluded from the calculation of diluted EPS as their exercise price is greater
than the weighted average share price during the year (i.e. they are out-of-the-money) and therefore it would not
be advantageous for the holders to exercise those options. The total number of options in issue is disclosed in
note 25.
The basic earnings per share before impairment provisions and legal costs has also been presented since, in the
opinion of the directors, this provides shareholders with a more appropriate measure of earnings derived from the
Group’s businesses. It can be reconciled to basic earnings per share as follows:

Basic earnings per share (pence) – basic
Impairment provisions of goodwill and development costs
Legal costs

Earnings per share before impairment provisions and legal costs

Reconciliation of earnings
Profit used for calculation of basic earnings per share
Impairment provisions of goodwill and development costs
Legal costs

Earnings before impairment provisions and legal costs

9.

Property, plant and equipment

2013
pence
0.03
0.51
–

2012
pence
0.04
0.04
0.04
———— ————
0.12
———— ————

———— ————

0.54

2013
£’000

2012
£’000

140
2,274
–

177
194
176
———— ————
547
———— ————

———— ————

2,414

At 30 April 2012
Cost
Accumulated depreciation

Net book value

At 30 April 2013
Cost
Accumulated depreciation

Net book value

Short
leasehold
improvements
£’000

Plant,
machinery
and motor
vehicles
£’000

Computers,
fixtures and
fittings
£’000

Total
£’000

523
(318)

1,461
(1,165)

3,000
(2,291)
———— ———— ———— ————
709
———— ———— ———— ————

1,016
(808)

205

296

208

529
(352)

1,554
(1,143)

3,225
(2,416)
———— ———— ———— ————
809
———— ———— ———— ————

1,142
(921)

177

221

411

Newmark Security PLC
27

Year ended 30 April 2012
Opening net book value
Additions
Disposals
Depreciation

Closing net book value

Year ended 30 April 2013
Opening net book value
Additions
Disposals
Depreciation

Closing net book value

Short
leasehold
improvements
£’000

Plant,
machinery
and motor
vehicles
£’000

Computers,
fixtures and
fittings
£’000

Total
£’000

231
12
–
(38)

349
137
(1)
(189)

788
261
(1)
(339)
———— ———— ———— ————
709
———— ———— ———— ————

———— ———— ———— ————

208
112
–
(112)

205

208

296

205
23
(12)
(39)

296
291
(9)
(167)

709
440
(21)
(319)
———— ———— ———— ————
809
———— ———— ———— ————

———— ———— ———— ————

208
126
–
(113)

177

221

411

The  net  book  value  of  property  plant  and  equipment  for  the  Group  includes  an  amount  of  £283,803
(2012: £232,539)  in  respect  of  assets  held  under  finance  leases  and  hire  purchase  contracts.  The  related
depreciation charge on these assets for the year was £119,167 (2012: £113,380).

10.

Intangible assets

At 30 April 2012
Cost
Amortisation
Impairment provision

Net book value

At 30 April 2013
Cost
Amortisation
Impairment provision

Net book value

Year ended 30 April 2012
Opening net book value
Additions
– Internally developed
Amortisation
Impairment provision

Closing net book value

Year ended 30 April 2013
Opening net book value
Additions
– Internally developed
– External
Amortisation
Impairment provision

Closing net book value

Development
costs
(internally
generated)
£’000

Licences,
patents
and
copyrights
£’000

Goodwill
£’000

Total
£’000

6,852
–
–

4,939
(915)
(194)

11,828
(935)
(194)
———— ———— ———— ————
10,699
———— ———— ———— ————

37
(20)
–

6,852

3,830

17

6,872
–
(1,791)

6,178
(1,502)
(677)

13,087
(1,527)
(2,468)
———— ———— ———— ————
9,092
———— ———— ———— ————

37
(25)
–

3,999

5,081

12

6,852

3,268

22

10,142

–
–
–

1,131
(375)
(194)

1,131
(380)
(194)
———— ———— ———— ————
10,699
———— ———— ———— ————

———— ———— ———— ————

–
(5)
–

6,852

3,830

17

6,852

3,830

17

10,699

1,239
–
(587)
(483)

–
20
–
(1,791)

1,239
20
(592)
(2,274)
———— ———— ———— ————
9,092
———— ———— ———— ————

———— ———— ———— ————

–
–
(5)
–

3,999

5,081

12

Newmark Security PLC
28

This impairment in the period of £483,000 represents internally generated development costs which no longer
satisfy the criteria for capitalisation under IAS38 as listed on page 20 as a consequence of the redevelopment of
the product design. The impairment in the previous period of £194,000 represents a product the directors decided
to no longer take forward.

The Group has no contractual commitments for development costs (2012: £Nil).

All development costs have a finite useful economic life.

11. Goodwill and impairment
Details of goodwill allocated to Cash Generating Units (“CGUs”)for which the amount of goodwill so allocated is
significant in comparison to total goodwill is as follows:

Goodwill
carrying amount
2013
£’000
4,003
1,078

2012
£’000
5,794
1,058
———— ————
6,852
———— ————

———— ————

5,081

Electronic division
Asset protection division

The recoverable amounts of all the above CGUs have been determined from value in use calculations based on
cash flow projections from formally approved budgets covering a five year period to 30 April 2018. The discount
rate which was applied was 13.0 per cent. (2012: 16.7 per cent.), the estimated weighted average cost of capital.

The trading companies all operate in certain niche markets, each of which can be in part project driven. Therefore
the budgets produced take known future contracts into account, and allow for historic projects as well. Within the
electronic division, market share is assumed to remain unchanged except for these known projects. In the asset
protection division, there is a range of products and different assumptions have been made about possibilities of
growth for each of these products. Operating margins have been based on historic figures for each product range
and overheads, mainly salaries, are expected to increase in line with inflation.

The reviews which are carried out at 30 April each year, indicated that an impairment provision was necessary,
against the goodwill in the electronic division of £1,791,000 this year. This has arisen from the development of the
new  access  control  system,  SATEON,  to  replace  the  JANUS  system  which  existed  at  the  date  of  acquisition  of
Grosvenor Technology Limited.

The growth rates for cash flows from operating activities for the period beyond the formal budgeted period within
the value in use calculation is based on an extrapolation of the budgeted cash flow for year 1 and are an average
of 13 per  cent.  and 0.5 per  cent. for  years  2  to  5 for  the  electronic  division  and  asset  protection  division
respectively (2012: 28 per cent. and 9 per cent. respectively). The growth rate for the electronic division reflects
the introduction of products to new geographical markets.

Newmark Security PLC
29

12. Subsidiaries
The principal subsidiaries of Newmark Security PLC, all of which have been included in these consolidated financial
statements, are as follows:

Name
Custom Micro Products Limited
(2a)
Newmark Technology Limited
Newmark Technology (C-Cure Division) Limited
Safetell International Limited
Safetell Limited
Safetell Security Screens Limited
Vema B.V.
Vema N.V.
Vema UK Limited
Grosvenor Technology Limited
Newmark Group Limited
Sateon Limited
ATM Protection (UK) Limited
ATM Protection Limited
Grosvenor Technology LLC

(2d)

(2b)

(2a)

(2e)

(2c)

Country of
incorporation
Great Britain
Great Britain
Great Britain
Great Britain
Great Britain
Great Britain
The Netherlands
The Netherlands
Great Britain
Great Britain
Great Britain
Great Britain
Great Britain
Great Britain
USA

Proportion of
ownership

interest(1)
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
98%
100%
100%
100%
100%
86.7%
86.7%
100%

Activity
Dormant
Trading
Dormant
Dormant
Trading
Trading
Holding
Dormant
Dormant
Trading
Dormant
Dormant
Trading
Trading
Trading

(1)
(2)

The shares held in all companies are ordinary shares
The investments in subsidiary companies are held directly by the Company apart from the following:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)

Owned by Grosvenor Technology Limited
Owned by Vema BV 51 per cent., Newmark Security PLC 47 per cent.
Owned by Vema NV
Owned by Safetell Limited
100 per cent. Owned by ATM Protection (UK) Limited

13.

Inventories

Raw materials and consumables
Work-in-progress
Finished goods and goods for resale

2013
£’000
572
77
695

2012
£’000
685
42
793
———— ————
1,520
———— ————

———— ————

1,344

Finished goods include an amount of £Nil (2012: £Nil) carried at fair value less costs to sell. The value of inventories
consumed in the year was £6,582,000 (2012: £3,733,000). The amount of inventory write downs in the year was
£75,000 (2012: £38,000). There are no inventories recoverable after 12 months (2012: £Nil).

14. Trade and other receivables

Trade receivables
Less: provision for impairment

and trade receivables

Trade receivables (net)
Other receivables
Accrued income
Prepayments

Newmark Security PLC
30

2013
£’000
2,236

2012
£’000
1,870

(52)

2,184
66
102
236

(22)
———— ————
1,848
13
246
266
———— ————
2,373
———— ————

———— ————

2,588

At  30 April  2013  trade  receivables  of  £973,000 (2012:  £730,000)  were  past  due  but  not  impaired.  The  ageing
analysis of these receivables is as follows:

Current
30 days past due
60 days past due

2013
£’000
1,262
570
404

2012
£’000
1,098
614
158
———— ————
1,870
———— ————

———— ————

2,236

Financial assets past due or impaired
The analysis of Group’s provisions against trade receivables is shown in the table below:

Analysis of trade receivables impairments

2013

2012

UK
USA
Europe

Total

Gross
Value
£’000
2,006
138
92

Net
Carrying
Amount
£’000
1,680
67
101
———— ———— ———— ———— ———— ————
1,848
———— ———— ———— ———— ———— ————

———— ———— ———— ———— ———— ————

Net
Carrying
Amount
£’000
1,954
138
92

Provision
£’000
(52)
–
–

Provision
£’000
(22)
–
–

Gross
Value
£’000
1,702
67
101

2,184

2,236

1,870

(52)

(22)

The  main  factor  used  in  assessing  any  impairment  of  trade  receivables  is  the  age  of  the  balance  and  the
circumstances of the individual customer. The fair value of trade receivables that are past due or impaired is their
carrying amount.

Movements on group provisions for impairment of trade receivables are as follows:

Opening balance
Increase in provisions
Receivable recovered during the year
Receivable written off during the year

Closing balance

The movement on the provision for impaired receivables has been included in the administrative expense line in
the income statement. The Group provides against specific receivables.

15. Trade and other payables – current

Trade payables
Other tax and social security taxes
Other payables
Deferred income
Deferred purchase consideration
Accruals

2013
£’000
22
27
4
(1)

2012
£’000
25
–
–
(3)
———— ————
22
———— ————

———— ————

52

2013
£’000
1,058
507
63
758
30
655

2012
£’000
1,121
600
632
594
102
486
———— ————
3,535
———— ————

———— ————

3,071

Other payables include an amount of £Nil (2012: £485,000) in respect of an invoice discount facility which was
secured on the trade receivables.

Newmark Security PLC
31

16. Other short term borrowings

Bank overdraft
Bank loans
– secured
Finance lease creditor (note 25)

2013
£’000
–

2012
£’000
1,878

153
141

148
121
———— ————
2,147
———— ————

———— ————

294

UK  subsidiaries  of  the  Group  use  the  same  principal  banker.  The  bank  overdraft  facility  provided  is  a  Group
composite facility comprising of current account and/or overdraft facility.

The Board reviews cash on a net basis in line with this facility but have disclosed surplusses and deficits separately
in the financial statements to comply with IAS32.

The  bank  loan is  secured  on  the  assets  of  the  UK  subsidiary  companies  and  is  repayable  by  equal  monthly
instalments from September 2011 to August 2014. Interest is payable at 2.5 per cent. above base rate.

Information about fair values on the financial liabilities is given in note 19.

17. Long term borrowings

Loan notes 
Bank loans – secured (note 16)
Finance lease creditor (note 24)

The loan notes were repaid during the year.

Information about fair values of this financial liability is given in note 19.

2013
£’000
–
52
132

2012
£’000
105
206
113
———— ————
424
———— ————

———— ————

184

18. Financial instruments – Risk Management
The  Group’s  overall  risk  management  programme  seeks  to  minimise  potential  adverse  effects  on  the  Group’s
financial performance.

The Group’s financial instruments comprise cash, borrowings and liquid resources, and various items such as trade
receivables and payables that arise directly from its operations. The Group is exposed through its operations to
one or more of the following financial risks:

•

•

•

•

Credit risk

Liquidity risk

Fair value or cash flow interest rate risk

Foreign currency risk

The Board identifies and evaluates financial risks in conjunction with the Group’s operating companies and the
policy for managing these risks is set by the Board following recommendations from the Group Finance Director.
Certain risks are managed centrally, while others are managed locally following guidelines communicated from
the centre. The policy for each of the above risks is described in more detail below, with the accounting policies as
set out in Note 1.

Newmark Security PLC
32

Financial Instruments
Categories of financial assets and financial liabilities are detailed below

Loans and receivables
2012
£’000

2013
£’000

Current financial assets
Trade and other receivables
Cash and cash equivalents

Total current financial assets

Current financial liabilities
Trade and other payables (excluding deferred purchase consideration)
Deferred purchase consideration
Loans and borrowings

Total current financial liabilities

Non-current financial liabilities
Loans and borrowings

Total non-current financial liabilities

Total financial liabilities

2,352
1,128

2,107
2,100
———— ————
4,207
———— ————

———— ————

3,480

Financial liabilities
measured at
amortised cost
2013
£’000

2012
£’000

3,041
30
294

3,433
102
2,147
———— ————
5,682
———— ————

———— ————

3,365

184

184

424
———— ————
424
———— ————

———— ————
———— ————

6,106
———— ————

3,549

Financial instrument risk exposure management
The  Group  is  exposed  to  risks  that  arise  from  its  use  of  financial  instruments.  This  note  describes  the  Group’s
objectives,  policies  and  processes  for  managing  those  risks  and  the  methods  used  to  measure  them.  Further
quantitative information in respect of these risks is presented throughout these financial statements.

There  have  been  no  substantive  changes  in  the  Group’s  exposure  to  financial  instrument  risks,  its  objectives,
policies  and  processes  for  managing  those  risks  or  the  methods  used  to  measure  them  from  previous  periods
unless otherwise stated in this note.

Principal financial instruments
The principal financial instruments used by the Group, from which financial instrument risk arises are

•
•
•
•
•
•

trade receivables
cash at bank
bank overdrafts
term loans
invoice discounting facilities
trade and other payables

General objectives, policies and processes
The Board has overall responsibility for the determination of the Group’s risk management objectives and policies.
The  overall  objective  of  the  Board  is  to  set  policies  that  seek  to  reduce  risk  as  far  as  possible  without  unduly
affecting the Group’s competitiveness and flexibility. Further details regarding these policies are set out below.

Credit risks
Credit risk arises principally from the Group’s trade receivables and reflects the risk that the counter party fails to
discharge its obligation in respect of the instrument.

Newmark Security PLC
33

It is Group policy to mitigate credit risk arising from the client base through the application of credit limits based
on credit ratings issued by the main credit rating agencies, and from the knowledge of the trading history with
that customer. For customers with no authorised credit limit, pro forma invoices will be issued requiring payment
in full before despatch of goods or provision of services.

Where  credit  terms  requested  by  the  customer  are  outside  the  Group’s  standard  terms  of  business  then
authorisation is sought from the Group Finance Director.

The  end  user  of  our  products  is  often  a  blue  chip  customer  but  we  normally  invoice  a  contractor  or  installer
employed by the end user. The Group subsidiary company is also often involved directly with the end user due to
our  knowledge  of  the  product  and  its  application.  The  subsidiary  has  also  usually  worked  with  many  of  these
contractors and installers for a number of years. Within the asset protection division, there are also retentions
outstanding in situations where our customer is a contractor.

Credit  risk  is  influenced  by  factors  specific  to  the  individuals  customers,  however  an  element  of  the  risk  is
influenced by the geographic locations in which they operate.

The  credit  quality  of  the  financial  assets  are  reviewed  and  assessed  on  an  ongoing  basis  which  enables  timely
judgements to be made on the position of each debt. This allows management to put in place action plans where
necessary to ensure the recoverability of the debts and the minimisation of potential write offs.

The Group records impairment losses on its trade receivables separately from gross receivables and reports these
net of provisions.

The Group’s maximum exposure to credit risk is equal to the carrying value of trade receivables and cash and cash
equivalents.

Management monitors the utilisation of the credit limits regularly and does not expect any material losses from
non-performance by the counterparties.

The Group does not enter into derivatives to manage credit risk, although in certain isolated cases may take steps
to mitigate such risks if it is sufficiently concentrated.

Quantitative disclosures of the credit risk exposure in relation to financial assets and further disclosures regarding
trade and other receivables, which are neither past due nor impaired, are provided in note 15.

Liquidity risk
Liquidity  risk  arises  from  the  Group’s  management  of  working  capital  together  with  the  finance  charges  and
principal payments on its debt instruments. It is the risk that the Group will encounter difficulty in meeting its
financial obligations as they fall due. The Group’s policy is to ensure that it has adequate financial resources to
enable  it  to  finance  its  day-to-day  operations  based  on  cash  flow  projections.  The  Group’s  working  capital
requirements are generally short term in nature and as such the Group utilises short-term invoice discounting
facilities. Longer term financing is utilised for the purpose of acquiring subsidiary undertakings. Cash balances are
reported weekly to the Board, and the Group Finance Director compares existing resources and available facilities
with  projected  outgoings.  Monthly  cash  flow  statements  are  prepared  and  reviewed  by  management  with
variances against budget. Cash flow budgets are produced annually and reviewed by the Board of Directors.

Borrowing facilities
The Group had undrawn committed borrowing facilities available at 30 April 2013 in which all conditions have
been met.

Expiry within 1 year
Expiry later than 1 year and not later than 5 years

Fixed
rate
£’000
–
195

Floating
rate
£’000
1,650
–

2012
Total
£’000
850
195
———— ———— ———— ————
1,045
———— ———— ———— ————

———— ———— ———— ————

2013
Total
£’000
1,650
195

1,650

1,845

195

The Group had floating rate invoice discounting facilities with a maximum aggregate facility limit at 30 April 2013
of £900,000 (2012: £1,100,000). These facilities are subject to 3 months’ notice period. The Group also has term
loans of £205,000 (2012: £354,000). The interest rate payable on the term loans is base rate plus 2.5 per cent. The
loans are repayable in monthly instalments.

Newmark Security PLC
34

The bank loans and overdrafts are secured by a debenture over the assets of the Group and the Company. The
invoice discounting facility is secured over the book debts of the electronic division of the Group.

The maturity analysis of the undiscounted financial liabilities measured at amortised costs is as follows:

2013
£’000
38
38
39
52

2012
£’000
522
37
74
206
———— ————
839
———— ————

———— ————

167

Up to 3 months
3 to 6 months
6 to 12 months
Later than 1 year and not later than 5 years

Included with in 0 -3 months period is the amounts drawn down via the invoice discounting facility.

Market risks
Market risks arise from the Group’s use of interest bearing financial instruments. It is the risk that the fair value
or future cash flow of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in interest rates or other market
factors.

Interest rate risk
The  Group  finances  its  operations  through  a  mixture  of  retained  profits,  bank  loans  and  invoice  discounting
facilities, both bank loans and invoice discounting facilities being at floating rates.

Interest rate risk sensitivity of interest rate exposure
The following table demonstrates the effect of a 1 per cent. movement from a base rate plus 2.5 per cent. based
on the term loan balances as at 30 April 2013 of £205,000.

Interest rate movement from base rate plus 2.5%
Interest (saving)/expenses (£000’s)

-1%
(1)

+1%
1
———— ————

———— ————

Interest Risk Profile
The following table sets out the carrying amount of the Group’s financial instruments that are exposed to interest
rate risk as at 30 April 2013, all of which are denominated in sterling:

Floating rate with maturity within one year
Cash and overdrafts
Advances drawn on invoice discounting
Term loan

Floating rate with maturity over one year
Term loan

2013

2012

Effective
Interest
Rate

Carrying
Amount
£’000

Effective
Interest
Rate

Carrying
Amount
£’000

–
Libor +2.5%
Libor +2.5%

1,128
–

–
Libor +2%
(153) Libor +2.5%

222
(485)
(148)

(52)
————
923
————

————

(206)
————
(617)
————

————

Foreign currency risk
The Group’s main foreign currency risk is the short-term risk associated with financial assets denominated in US
dollars  and  Euros  relating  to  the  UK  operations  whose  functional  currency  is  sterling.  The  risk  arises  on  the
difference between exchange rates at the time the invoice is raised to when the invoice is settled by the customer.

The Group is also exposed to currency risk on financial liabilities which are denominated in currencies other than
sterling.

Newmark Security PLC
35

The carrying values of the Group’s financial assets and liabilities are denominated in the following currencies:

Pound sterling
US dollar
Euro

Financial liabilities

Financial assets
2013
£’000
3,258
130
92

2012
£’000
5,788
70
248
———— ———— ———— ————
6,106
———— ———— ———— ————

———— ———— ———— ————

2012
£’000
4,033
107
67

2013
£’000
2,933
133
483

3,480

3,549

4,207

The effect of a 10 per cent. strengthening of the Euro and Dollar against Sterling at the balance sheet date on the
Euro/Dollar  denominated  trade  receivables  and  payables  carried  at  that  date  would,  all  other  variables  held
constant,  have  resulted  in  a  net  increase  in  pre-tax  profit  for  the  year  and  increase  of  net  assets  of  £36,000
(2012: £12,000). A 10 per cent. weakening in the exchange rates would, on the same basis, have decreased pre-tax
profit and decreased net assets by £43,000 (2012: £15,000).

Capital
The Group considers its capital to comprise its ordinary share capital, share premium account, foreign exchange
reserve and accumulated retained earnings.

In managing its capital, the Group’s primary objective is to ensure its continued ability to provide a consistent
return for its equity shareholders through capital growth and distributions. The Group seeks to maintain a gearing
ratio that balances risks and returns at an acceptable level and also to maintain a sufficient funding base to enable
the Group to meet its working capital and strategic investment needs. In making decisions to adjust its capital
structure  to  achieve  these  aims,  the  Group  considers  not  only  its  short-term  position  but  also  its  long-term
operational and strategic objectives.

The debt-to-adjusted-capital ratios at 30 April 2013 and at 30 April 2012 were as follows:

Loans and borrowings
Less: cash and cash equivalents

Net (cash)/debt

Total equity

(Cash)/debt to adjusted capital ratio

2013
£’000
478
(1,128)

2012
£’000
2,571
(2,100)
———— ————
471
———— ————
10,762
———— ————

———— ————
———— ————

10,909

(650)

(5.96)%

4.38%

19. Financial assets and liabilities – Numerical information
The weighted average interest rate of fixed rate liabilities and the weighted average period for which they are fixed
is as follows:

Sterling

Fair values
The book value and fair value of financial liabilities are as follows:

Rate
2013
%
3.2

Period
2012
Years
2.1
———— ———— ———— ————

———— ———— ———— ————

Period
2013
Years
1.2

Rate
2012
%
3.2

Bank loans
Finance lease creditor
Loan notes

Book
value
2013
£’000
205
273
–

Fair
value
2013
£’000
201
247
–

Fair
value
2012
£’000
342
212
95
———— ———— ———— ————
649
———— ———— ———— ————

———— ———— ———— ————

Book
value
2012
£’000
354
234
105

448

478

693

Newmark Security PLC
36

Fair values of financial liabilities have been determined by discounting cash payments at prevailing market rates
of interest having regard to the specific risks attaching to them.

The fair values of all other financial assets and liabilities at 30 April 2013 and 2012 are equal to their book value.

20. Provisions

At 30 April 2012

Due within one year or less
Due after more than one year

At 30 April 2013

Due within one year or less
Due after more than one year

Leasehold
dilapidations
£’000
84

Holiday
pay
£’000
81

84

81
–

–
84

Total
£’000
165
———— ———— ————
81
84
———— ———— ————
165
———— ———— ————

———— ———— ————

213
———— ———— ————
129
84
———— ———— ————
213
———— ———— ————

———— ———— ————

129
–

–
84

129

129

84

84

81

Leasehold dilapidations relate to the estimated cost of returning a leasehold property to its original state at the
end of the lease in accordance with the lease terms. On recognition of the initial provision, an equal amount was
recognised as part of the cost of the leasehold improvements. This cost is recognised as depreciation of leasehold
improvements over the remaining term of the lease. The main uncertainty relates to estimating the cost that will
be incurred at the end of the lease.

21. Deferred tax
Deferred  tax  is  calculated  in  full  on  temporary  differences  under  the  liability  method  using  a  tax  rate  of
23 per cent. (2012: 24 per cent.).

The movement on the deferred tax account is as shown below:

Group

2013

2012

Liability
At 1 May
Income statement
Transfer from corporation tax recoverable

At 30 April

324
(141)
17

454
40
(170)
———— ————
324
———— ————

———— ————

200

Deferred tax assets have been recognised in respect of all temporary timing differences giving rise to deferred tax
assets because it is probable that these assets will be recovered.

The movements in deferred tax assets and liabilities (prior to the offsetting of balances within the same jurisdiction
as permitted by IAS12) during the period are shown below.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are only offset where there is a legally enforceable right of offset and there is
an intention to settle the balances net.

Newmark Security PLC
37

Details of the deferred tax liability, and amounts charged/(credited) to the consolidated income statement are as
follows:

Accelerated capital allowances
Other temporary and deductible differences
Available losses

Accelerated capital allowances
Other temporary and deductible differences
Available losses

22. Share capital

Ordinary shares of 1p each
At beginning and end of the year

23. Reserves

At 30 April 2011
Translation differences
on overseas operations
Profit for the year
Dividends paid

At 30 April 2012

At 30 April 2012
Translation differences
on overseas operations
Profit for the year
Dividends paid

At 30 April 2013

200

Liability/
(Asset)
2013
£’000
(124)
785
(461)

Charged/
(credited)
to income
2013
£’000
73
(30)
(184)
———— ————
(141)
———— ————

———— ————

Liability/
(Asset)
2012
£’000
(173)
567
(70)

Charged/
(credited)
to income
2012
£’000
(79)
119
–
———— ————
40
———— ————

———— ————

324

2013
Number

Issued and fully paid

2013
£

2012
Number

2012
£

450,432,316

4,504,323
—————— —————— —————— ——————

—————— —————— —————— ——————

450,432,316

4,504,323

Share
premium
£’000
502

Merger
reserve
£’000
801

Retained
earnings
£’000
5,078

Foreign
exchange
reserve
£’000
(175)

–
–
–

–
–
–

–
–
–
———— ———— ———— ————
(175)
———— ———— ———— ————

———— ———— ———— ————

–
177
(125)

5,130

502

801

801

5,130

(175)

502

–
–
–

–
–
–

7
–
–
———— ———— ———— ————
(168)
———— ———— ———— ————

———— ———— ———— ————

–
140
–

5,270

502

801

The share premium account represents the excess of the market value of shares issued over the nominal value of
those shares, less expenses of issue.

The  merger  reserve  arose  in  the  year  ended  30  April  2003  when  the  Company  made  an  offer  to  the  Global
Depository Receipt (“GDR”) holders of Vema N.V. for the 49 per cent. of the issued share capital of that company
not already owned by the Group. The offer represented 1.5 Newmark shares for each GDR and the merger reserve
represented the excess of market value over nominal value of the shares issued.

Newmark Security PLC
38

Retained earnings represents the cumulative amount of retained profits/losses each year as reported in the income
statement, plus the exchange differences on the retranslation of foreign operations up to 1 May 2005 (the date
of transition to IFRS).

Foreign  exchange  reserve  represents  the  cumulative  exchange  differences  on  the  retranslation  of  foreign
operations from 1 May 2005.

Dividends

2013
£’000

2012
£’000

Final dividend of Nil pence (2012: 0.0275 pence) per ordinary share 

paid, during the year relating to the previous year’s results

–

125
———— ————

———— ————

The  directors  are proposing  a  final  dividend of  0.0333 pence  per  ordinary  share  (2012: Nil)  totalling  £150,000
(2012: £Nil).

24. Leases
Finance leases
Future lease payments are due as follows:

Not later than one year
Later than one year and not later than five years

Not later than one year
Later than one year and not later than five years

The present value of future lease payments are analysed as:

Current liabilities
Non-current liabilities

26

299

Minimum
lease
payments
2013
£’000
154
145

Interest
2013
£’000
13
13

Present
value
2013
£’000
141
132
———— ———— ————
273
———— ———— ————

———— ———— ————

Minimum
lease
payments
2012
£’000
133
123

Interest
2012
£’000
12
10

Present
value
2012
£’000
121
113
———— ———— ————
234
———— ———— ————

———— ———— ————

256

22

2013
£’000
141
132

2012
£’000
121
113
———— ————
234
———— ————

———— ————

273

Operating leases – lessee
The Group leases the majority of its properties. The terms of property leases vary, although they all tend to be
tenant repairing with rent reviews every 2 to 5 years.

Commitments under non-cancellable operating leases expiring:

Not later than one year
Later than one year and not later than five years
Later than five years

Newmark Security PLC
39

2013
£’000
12
818
–

2012
£’000
131
792
–
———— ————
923
———— ————

———— ————

830

25. Share-based payment
The Group previously operated two share option schemes, a HM Revenue & Custom’s Approved Share Option Scheme
and an Unapproved Share Option Scheme. The schemes require that exercise of options be subject to the satisfaction
of certain performance criteria. Rights over share options will be forfeited after leaving the Group’s employment.

The total number of share options outstanding under the Approved and Unapproved Share Option Schemes were:

Date of Grant
September 2002
October 2005

Total

Subscription
Price payable
2p
1.5p

2013

2012

2013
Approved Unapproved
–
7,000,000

2012
Approved Unapproved
–
5,625,000
7,000,000
7,000,000
———— ———— ———— ————
7,000,000
12,625,000
———— ———— ———— ————

———— ———— ———— ————

125,000
7,000,000

7,125,000

7,000,000

The options may be exercised within 10 years from the date of issue.
The remaining weighted average contractual lives for Approved and Unapproved Options were 2.5 and 2.5 years
respectively (2012: 3.4 and 2.1).
Of the total number of options outstanding at the end of the year 7,000,000 Approved and 7,000,000 Unapproved
(2012: 7,125,000 and 12,625,000 respectively) had vested at the end of the year.
There were no options granted or exercised during the year.
In April 2008, the Group adopted the Newmark Security PLC EMI Share Option Plan which enabled the Board to
grant qualifying share options under the HM Revenue and Custom’s Enterprise Management Incentive (“EMI”) tax
code  and  also  unapproved  share  options  to  employees  and  directors.  The  EMI  share  options  vest  and  become
exercisable 3 years from the date of grant (subject to leaver and takeover provisions), or such other period of time
specified by the Remuneration Committee. Performance conditions set by the Remuneration Committee will apply
to these EMI options. In that year the Company granted 4,800,000 options under the EMI approved share option
scheme and 1,000,000 options under the EMI unapproved share option scheme. The options were granted at a
price  of  1.425 pence  per  share.  No  further  options  were  granted  in  the  year.  The  remaining  weighted  average
contractual lives for both Approved and Unapproved Options under this scheme were 4.5 years (2012: 5.5 years).
All these options had vested at the year end.

The share based remuneration expense for equity settled schemes was £Nil (2012: £Nil).

26. Related party transactions
Details of directors’ remuneration are given in the Report of the Remuneration Committee on page 10.

Loan notes repaid to the directors during the year were:

M Dwek
M Rapoport
N Medlam

In the opinion of the directors there is no one Ultimate Controlling Party of the Group.

£
72,500
25,000
7,500
————
105,000

————————

Newmark Security PLC
40

2013
£’000
1,128
–

2012
£’000
2,100
(1,878)
———— ————
222
———— ————

———— ————

1,128

2013
£’000
1,128

2012
£’000
222
———— ————

———— ————

906
222

471
(249)
———— ————
222
———— ————

———— ————

1,128

191

125
———— ————

———— ————

27. Notes supporting cash flow statement
Cash and cash equivalents for purposes of the statement of cash flow comprises:

Cash available on demand
Overdrafts

Cash and cash equivalents comprises:

Cash available on demand

Net cash decrease in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year

Cash and cash equivalents at end of year

Significant non-cash transactions are as follows:

Financing activities
Proceeds from finance lease creditor

Newmark Security PLC
41

COMPANY BALANCE SHEET
30 April 2013 – UK GAAP Financial Statements
Company number: 3339998

Note

2013
£’000

2013
£’000

2012
£’000

2012
£’000

Fixed assets
Investment in subsidiaries
Tangible assets

Current assets
Debtors
Cash and cash equivalents

3
4

5

Creditors: amounts falling due within one year

6

Net current liabilities

Total assets less current liabilities
Creditors: amounts falling due after more than

2,455
103
————
2,558

(12,131)
————

one year

Accruals and deferred income

Net assets

Capital and reserves
Called up share capital
Share premium account
Merger reserve
Profit and loss account

Shareholder’s funds-Equity

7

8
9
9
9

10

The notes on pages 43 to 46 form part of these financial statements.

18,428
71
————
18,499

18,869
6
————
18,875

1,898
–
————
1,898

(12,688)
————

(10,790)
————
8,085

(311)
(153)
————
7,621
————

————

4,504
502
801
1,814
————
7,621
————

————

(9,573)
————
8,926

(52)
(161)
————
8,713
————

————

4,504
502
801
2,906
————
8,713
————

————

These financial statements were approved by the Board of Directors and authorised for issue on 30 July 2013.

M Dwek
Director

Newmark Security PLC
42

NOTES FORMING PART OF THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
for the year ended 30 April 2013

Accounting policies

1.
The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with applicable accounting standards in the United
Kingdom and under the historical cost convention. The accounts have been prepared on the going concern basis.

The  following  principal  accounting  policies  have  been  applied  consistently  in  dealing  with  items  which  are
considered material in relation to the Company’s financial statements.

Profit and Loss Account
Under Section 408 of the Companies Act 2006 the Company is exempt from the requirement to present its own
profit and loss account. The profit for the year ended 30 April 2013 is disclosed in note 9.

Depreciation
Depreciation is provided to write off the cost, less estimated residual values, of all fixed assets evenly over their
expected useful lives. It is calculated at the following rates:

Computer equipment
Fixtures and fittings

– 25 per cent. per annum straight line
– 10 per cent. per annum straight line

Valuation of investments
Investments held as fixed assets are stated at cost less any provision for impairment.

Deferred taxation
Deferred tax balances are recognised in respect of all timing differences that have originated but not reversed by
the balance sheet date except that the recognition of deferred tax assets is limited to the extent that the company
anticipates  to  make  sufficient  taxable  profits  in  the  future  to  absorb  the  reversal  of  the  underlying  timing
differences.

Deferred tax balances are not discounted.

Leased assets
Operating lease rentals are charged to the profit and loss account on a straight-line basis over the term of the
lease.

Dividends
Dividends  are  recognised  when  they  become  legally  payable.  In  the  case  of  interim  dividends  to  equity
shareholders, this is when declared by the directors. In the case of final dividends, this is when approved by the
shareholders at the AGM.

2.

Employees and staff costs

2013
Number

2012
Number

The average number of employees, including directors, during the period was:
Office and management

Staff costs (including Executive Director) comprise:
Wages and salaries
Employer’s national insurance contributions and similar taxes

Newmark Security PLC
43

2

2
———— ————

———— ————

2013
£’000

2012
£’000

171
21

153
19
———— ————
172
———— ————

———— ————

192

The impairment in the year has arisen from the development of the new access control system, SATEON, to replace
the JANUS system which existed at the date of acquisition of Grosvenor Technology Limited.

The subsidiaries of Newmark Security PLC are as follows:

3.

Investment in subsidiary

Cost
At 1 May 2012
Impairment provision

At 30 April 2013

Net book value at 30 April 2013

Net book value at 30 April 2012

(2b)

Name
Custom Micro Products Limited
(2a)
Newmark Technology Limited
Newmark Technology (C-Cure Division) Limited
Safetell International Limited
Safetell Limited
Safetell Security Screens Limited
Vema B.V.
Vema N.V.
Vema UK Limited
Grosvenor Technology Limited
Newmark Group Limited
Sateon Limited
ATM Protection (UK) Limited
ATM Protection Limited
Grosvenor Technology LLC
(1)
(2)

(2d)

(2a)

(2e)

(2c)

£’000

18,869
(441)
————
18,428

18,428

————————
————————
————————

18,869

Country of
incorporation
Great Britain
Great Britain
Great Britain
Great Britain
Great Britain
Great Britain
The Netherlands
The Netherlands
Great Britain
Great Britain
Great Britain
Great Britain
Great Britain
Great Britain
USA

Proportion of
ownership

interest(1)
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
98%
100%
100%
100%
100%
86.7%
86.7%
100%

Activity
Dormant
Trading
Dormant
Dormant
Trading
Trading
Holding
Dormant
Dormant
Trading
Dormant
Dormant
Trading
Trading
Trading

The shares held in all companies are ordinary shares
The investments in subsidiary companies are held directly by the Company apart from the following:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)

Owned by Grosvenor Technology Limited
Owned by Vema BV 51 per cent., Newmark Security PLC 47 per cent.
Owned by Vema NV
Owned by Safetell Limited
100 per cent. Owned by ATM Protection (UK) Limited

Newmark Security PLC
44

4.

Tangible assets

Cost
At 1 May 2012
Additions in the year

At 30 April 2013

Depreciation
At 1 May 2012
Charge for the year

At 30 April 2013

Net book value
At 30 April 2013

At 30 April 2012

5.

Debtors

Short
leasehold
improvements
£’000

Motor

Computers
Fixtures
vehicles & Fittings
£’000

£’000

Total
£’000

–
10

16
73
———— ———— ———— ————
89
———— ———— ———— ————

16
20

–
43

43

36

10

–
–

10
8
———— ———— ———— ————
18
———— ———— ———— ————

10
7

–
1

17

1

–

10

42

71
———— ———— ———— ————

———— ———— ———— ————
———— ———— ———— ————

6
———— ———— ———— ————

19

–

–

6

Amount due from group undertakings
Other debtors
Prepayments

All amounts shown under debtors fall due for payment within one year.

6.

Creditors: amounts falling due within one year

Bank overdraft
Loan
Amount due to group undertakings
Other taxation and social security
Other payables

2013
£’000
2,421
15
19

2012
£’000
1,898
–
–
———— ————
1,898
———— ————

———— ————

2,455

2013
£’000
–
153
11,948
22
8

2012
£’000
1,878
148
10,553
109
–
———— ————
12,688
———— ————

———— ————

12,131

The  bank  loan is  secured  on  the  assets  of  the  UK  subsidiary  companies  and  is  repayable  by  equal  monthly
instalments from September 2011 to August 2014. Interest is payable at 2.5 per cent. above base rate.

7.

Creditors: amounts falling due after more than one year

Loan notes
Loans (see note 6)

The loan notes were repaid during the year.

Newmark Security PLC
45

2013
£’000
–
52

2012
£’000
105
206
———— ————
311
———— ————

———— ————

52

8.

Share capital

Allotted, called up and fully paid:
450,432,316 Ordinary shares of 1p each
(2012: 450,432,316)

9.

Reserves

At 1 May 2012
Profit for the year

At 30 April 2013

10. Reconciliation of movements in shareholder’s funds

Opening shareholder’s funds
Profit for the year
Dividends paid

Closing shareholder’s funds

2013
£

2012
£

4,504,323
4,504,323
———— ————

———— ————

Merger
reserve
£’000
801
–

Share
premium
account
£’000
502
–

Profit and
loss
account
£’000
1,814
1,092
———— ———— ————
2,906
———— ———— ————

———— ———— ————

502

801

2013
£’000
7,621
1,092
–

2012
£’000
7,556
190
(125)
———— ————
7,621
———— ————

———— ————

8,713

11. Commitments under operating leases
At 30 April 2013 the company had annual commitments under non-cancellable operating leases as follows:

2013
Land and
buildings
£’000
49

2012
Land and
buildings
£’000
30
———— ————

———— ————

Expiring within two to three years

Newmark Security PLC
46

THIS DOCUMENT IS IMPORTANT AND REQUIRES YOUR IMMEDIATE ATTENTION.
If you are in any doubt as to any aspect of the proposals referred to in this document or as to the action you
should  take,  you  should  seek  your  own  advice  from  a  stockbroker,  solicitor,  accountant,  or  other  professional
adviser.

If  you  have  sold  or  otherwise  transferred  all  of  your  shares,  please  pass  this  document  together  with  the
accompanying documents to the purchaser or transferee, or to the person who arranged the sale or transfer so
they can pass these documents to the person who now holds the shares.

Newmark Security PLC
47

NEWMARK SECURITY PLC
(incorporated and registered in England and Wales under number 3339998)

NOTICE OF ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING
If you do not propose to attend the Annual General Meeting to be held at 58 Grosvenor Street, London W1K 3JB
on 12 September 2013 at 11.00 a.m. please complete and submit a proxy form in accordance with the instructions
printed on the enclosed form. The proxy form must be received no later than 11.00 a.m. on 10 September 2013.

Notice is hereby given that the Annual General Meeting of the above-mentioned company (“the Company”) will
be held at 58 Grosvenor Street, London W1K 3JB on 12 September 2013 at 11.00 a.m.

You will be asked to consider and pass the resolutions below. Resolutions 6 to 8 (inclusive) will be proposed as
special resolutions. All other resolutions will be proposed as ordinary resolutions.

Ordinary resolutions
1.

Annual report and financial statements
To  receive  and  approve  the  accounts  for  the  year  ended  30  April  2013  together  with  the  reports  of  the
directors and auditors thereon.

2.

3.

4.

5.

Rotation and retirement of directors
To re-elect Maurice Dwek and Derek Blethyn as directors of the Company, who are retiring by rotation in
accordance with the articles of association of the Company.

Appointment of auditors
To re-appoint BDO LLP of 2 City Place, Beehive Ring Road, Gatwick, West Sussex RH6 0PA as auditors of the
Company to hold office from the conclusion of the meeting until the conclusion of the next general meeting
of the Company at which accounts are laid and to authorise the directors of the Company to determine their
remuneration.

Dividend
To declare a final dividend for the financial year ended 30 April 2013 of 0.0333 pence per ordinary share of
1 pence each.

Remuneration of directors
THAT the remuneration of the directors be approved as set out in the accounts for the year ended 30 April
2013.

Newmark Security PLC
48

Authority to allot

Special Resolutions
6.
THAT, in accordance with section 551 of the Companies Act 2006 (“the 2006 Act”), the directors be generally and
unconditionally authorised to allot shares in the Company up to an aggregate nominal amount of £1,500,000,
being equal to approximately 89 per cent of the nominal amount of ordinary shares of the Company in issue on
the latest practicable date prior to the printing of the Notice of the Annual General Meeting, save that in the case
of  the  cancellation  and  re-grant  of  options  under  the  terms  of  an  employee  share  scheme  or  otherwise,  the
cancelled  options  shall  not  be  counted  so  that  the  aggregate  nominal  amount  of  equity  securities  which  the
directors are empowered to allot shall be reduced only by the number of any unexercised options in existence from
time to time, any shares acquired on the exercise of options and any shares allotted under the authority of this
resolution provided that this authority shall, unless renewed, varied or revoked by the Company, expire on the
earlier of the conclusion of the next following annual general meeting of the Company and 15 months from the
passing  of  this  resolution  save  that  the  Company  may,  before  such  expiry,  make  an  offer  or  agreement  which
would  or  might  require  shares  to  be  allotted  and  the  directors  may  allot  shares  in  pursuance  of  such  offer  or
agreement notwithstanding that the authority conferred by this resolution has expired.

This authority is in substitution for all previous authorities conferred on the directors in accordance with section
80 of the Companies Act 1985 or section 551 of the 2006 Act.

Disapplication of pre-emption rights

7.
THAT, subject to the passing of the resolution 6 above and in accordance with section 570 of the 2006 Act, the
directors be generally empowered to allot equity securities (as defined in section 560 of the 2006 Act) pursuant
to the authority conferred by resolution 6, as if section 561(1) of the 2006 Act did not apply to any such allotment,
provided that this power shall:

7.1. be limited to the allotment of equity securities up to an aggregate nominal amount of £450,000;

7.2

save  that  in  the  case  of  the  cancellation  and  re-grant  of  options  under  the  terms  of  an  employee  share
scheme or otherwise, the cancelled options shall not be counted so that the aggregate nominal amount of
equity  securities  which  the  directors  are  empowered  to  allot  shall  be  reduced  only  by  the  number  any
unexercised options in existence from time to time, any shares acquired on the exercise of options and any
shares allotted during the period set out in paragraph 7.3 below; and

7.3. expire on the earlier of the conclusion of the next following annual general meeting of the Company and 15
months from the passing of this resolution (unless renewed, varied or revoked by the Company prior to or
on that date) save that the Company may, before such expiry make an offer or agreement which would or
might require equity securities to be allotted after such expiry and the directors may allot equity securities
in pursuance of any such offer or agreement notwithstanding that the power conferred by this resolution
has expired.

Laser seals

8.
THAT the articles of association of the Company be amended by deleting the present article 28.2 and replacing it
with the following new article 28.2:

A share certificate may be issued under seal (by affixing the seal to or printing the seal or a representation of it on
the certificate) or signed by at least two directors or by at least one director and the secretary. The Board may by
resolution decide, either generally or in any particular case or cases, that any signatures on any share certificates
need  not  be  autographic  but  may  be  applied  to  the  certificates  by  some  mechanical  or  other  means  or  may  be
printed on them or that the certificates need not be signed by any person.

By order of the Board
BRIAN BEECRAFT
Company Secretary
Newmark Security PLC
57 Grosvenor Street
London W1K 3JA

Registered in England and Wales No. 3339998

30 July 2013

Newmark Security PLC
49

Notes to the Notice of Annual General Meeting

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

Members are entitled to appoint a proxy to exercise all or any of their rights to attend and to speak and vote on their behalf at the meeting.
A shareholder may appoint more than one proxy in relation to the Annual General Meeting provided that each proxy is appointed to exercise
the rights attached to a different share or shares held by that shareholder. A proxy need not be a shareholder of the Company. A proxy form
which may be used to make such appointment and give proxy instructions accompanies this notice.

To be valid any proxy form or other instrument appointing a proxy must be received by post or (during normal business hours only) by hand
at Capita Registrars, PXS, The Registry, 34 Beckenham Road, Beckenham, BR3 4TU no later than 11.00 a.m. on 10 September 2013.

The return of a completed proxy form, other such instrument or any CREST Proxy Instruction (as described in paragraph 9 below) will not
prevent a shareholder attending the Annual General Meeting and voting in person if he/she wishes to do so.

The statement of the rights of shareholders in relation to the appointment of proxies in paragraphs 1 and 2 above does not apply to Nominated
Persons. The rights described in those paragraphs can only be exercised by shareholders of the Company.

Any person to whom this notice is sent who is a person nominated under section 146 of the Companies Act 2006 to enjoy information rights
(a “Nominated Person”) may, under an agreement between him/her and the shareholder by whom he/she was nominated, have a right to be
appointed  (or  to  have  someone  else  appointed)  as  a  proxy  for  the  Annual  General  Meeting.  If  a  Nominated  Person  has  no  such  proxy
appointment right or does not wish to exercise it, he/she may, under any such agreement, have a right to give instructions to the shareholder
as to the exercise of voting rights.

To be entitled to attend and vote at the Annual General Meeting (and for the purpose of the determination by the Company of the votes they
may cast), Shareholders must be registered in the Register of Members of the Company at 6.00 p.m. on 10 September 2013 (or, in the event
of any adjournment, 6.00 p.m. on the date which is two days before the time of the adjourned meeting). Changes to the Register of Members
after the relevant deadline shall be disregarded in determining the rights of any person to attend and vote at the meeting.

As  at 29 July  2013  (being  the  last  business  day  prior  to  the  publication  of  this  Notice)  the  Company’s  issued  share  capital  consists  of
450,432,316 ordinary shares of 1p each, carrying one vote each. Therefore, the total voting rights in the Company as at 29 July 2013 are
450,432,316.

CREST members who wish to appoint a proxy or proxies through the CREST electronic proxy appointment service may do so by using the
procedures described in the CREST Manual. CREST Personal Members or other CREST sponsored members, and those CREST members who have
appointed a service provider(s), should refer to their CREST sponsor or voting service provider(s), who will be able to take the appropriate action
on their behalf.

In order for a proxy appointment or instruction made using the CREST service to be valid, the appropriate CREST message (a “CREST Proxy
Instruction”)  must  be  properly  authenticated  in  accordance  with  Euroclear  UK  &  Ireland  Limited’s  specifications,  and  must  contain  the
information  required  for  such  instruction,  as  described  in  the  CREST  Manual.  The  message,  regardless  of  whether  it  constitutes  the
appointment of a proxy or is an amendment to the instruction given to a previously appointed proxy must, in order to be valid, be transmitted
so as to be received by Capita Registrars (IDRA10) by 11.00 a.m. on 10 September 2013. For this purpose, the time of receipt will be taken to
be the time (as determined by the timestamp applied to the message by the CREST Application Host) from which the issuer’s agent is able to
retrieve the message by enquiry to CREST in the manner prescribed by CREST. After this time any change of instructions to proxies appointed
through CREST should be communicated to the appointee through other means.

CREST members and, where applicable, their CREST sponsors, or voting service providers should note that Euroclear UK & Ireland Limited does
not make available special procedures in CREST for any particular message. Normal system timings and limitations will, therefore, apply in
relation to the input of CREST Proxy Instructions. It is the responsibility of the CREST member concerned to take (or, if the CREST member is
a CREST personal member, or sponsored member, or has appointed a voting service provider, to procure that his CREST sponsor or voting
service provider(s) take(s)) such action as shall be necessary to ensure that a message is transmitted by means of the CREST system by any
particular time. In this connection, CREST members and, where applicable, their CREST sponsors or voting system providers are referred, in
particular, to those sections of the CREST Manual concerning practical limitations of the CREST system and timings.

The Company may treat as invalid a CREST Proxy Instruction in the circumstances set out in Regulation 35(5)(a) of the Uncertificated Securities
Regulations 2001.

Shareholders  should  note  that  it  is  possible  that,  pursuant  to  requests  made  by  shareholders  of  the  Company  under  section  527  of  the
Companies Act 2006, the Company may be required to publish on a website a statement setting out any matter relating to: (i) the audit of the
Company’s accounts (including the auditor’s report and the conduct of the audit) that are to be laid before the Annual General Meeting; or (ii)
any circumstance connected with an auditor of the Company ceasing to hold office since the previous meeting at which annual accounts and
reports were laid in accordance with section 437 of the Companies Act 2006. The Company may not require the shareholders requesting any
such website publication to pay its expenses in complying with sections 527 or 528 of the Companies Act 2006. Where the Company is required
to place a statement on a website under section 527 of the Companies Act 2006, it must forward the statement to the Company’s auditor not
later than the time when it makes the statement available on the website. The business which may be dealt with at the Annual General Meeting
includes any statement that the Company has been required under section 527 of the Companies Act 2006 to publish on a website.

A  corporation  which  is  a  member  can  appoint  one  or  more  corporate  representatives  who  may  exercise,  on  its  behalf,  all  its  powers  as  a
member provided that no more than one corporate representative exercises powers over the same share.

Voting on all resolutions will be conducted by way of a show of hands unless otherwise required.

The following documents will be available for inspection at 58 Grosvenor Street, London W1K 3JB from 30 July 2013 until the time of the
Meeting and at the Meeting venue itself for at least 15 minutes prior to the Meeting until the end of the Meeting:

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

Copies of the service contracts of executive directors of the Company.

Copies of the letters of appointment of the non-executive directors of the Company.

Copies of the letter of appointment of the auditors of the Company.

Copies of the annual report and financial statements.

Newmark Security PLC
50

16.

Except as provided above, members who have general queries about the Meeting should use the following means of communication (no other
methods of communication will be accepted):

(a)

by post to Newmark Security PLC 58 Grosvenor Street London VV1K 3JB.

You may not use any electronic address provided either:

(a)

(b)

in this notice of annual general meeting; or

any related documents (including the chairman's letter and proxy form),

to communicate with the Company for any purposes other than those expressly stated.

Newmark Security PLC
51

sterling 161397