Quarterlytics / Utilities / Regulated Gas / Northwest Natural Company

Northwest Natural Company

nwn · NYSE Utilities
Claim this profile
Ticker nwn
Exchange NYSE
Sector Utilities
Industry Regulated Gas
Employees 1001-5000
← All annual reports
FY2002 Annual Report · Northwest Natural Company
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
NW Natural
220 NW Second Avenue
Portland, Oregon 97209
www.nwnatural.com

Serving
Serving
with Pride
with Pride

2002 Annual Report
2002 Annual Report

Corporate Profile

Financial Briefs

2002

2001

Percent
increase
(decrease)

Corporate Information

NW Natural is a 144-year-old natural gas

local distribution company headquartered

in  Portland,  Oregon.  For  more  than  a

decade, it has grown at two to three times

the national average for natural gas LDCs.

The  Company  serves  more  than

560,000 customers in northwest Oregon

and southwest Washington, including the

Portland-Vancouver metropolitan area,

the Willamette Valley, the northern Oregon

coast and the Columbia River Gorge. More

than 200,000 customers have been added

to NW Natural’s distribution system in the

past 10 years.

In keeping with its steady growth, the

Company has increased annual dividends

paid to shareholders every year for 47

consecutive years.

NW Natural purchases natural gas for

its core market from a variety of suppliers

in the western United States and Canada.

In addition, the Company operates an un-

derground gas storage facility in Columbia

County, Oregon, and leases additional gas

storage outside its service area. NW Natural

also operates two liquefied natural gas

plants in its service area.

Astoria

Mist

Vancouver

Portland

Molalla

The Dalles

Salem

Lincoln
City

Newport

Eugene

Coos Bay

Albany

Legend

Williams Northwest 
Pipeline
NW Natural gas
transmission line
Kelso Beaver (KB) Pipeline
Proposed pipelines to
Molalla and Coos Bay
Service territory
LNG plant
District offices
Mist underground
storage
Propane system

Earnings
Financial facts ($000):

Net operating revenues
Net income
Earnings applicable to common stock

287,544
43,792
41,512

276,011
50,187
47,786

Financial ratios (%):

Return on average common equity
Capital structure at year-end
Long-term debt
Preferred and preference stock
Common stock equity

Common stock
Shareholder data:

Common shareholders
Average shares outstanding (000)

Per share data ($):
Basic earnings
Diluted earnings
Dividends paid on common stock
Book value at year-end
Market value at year-end

Operating highlights

8.7

47.6
0.9
51.5

10,026
25,431

1.63
1.62
1.260
18.88
27.06

10.4

43.0
3.8
53.2

10,359
25,159

1.90
1.88
1.245
18.56
25.50

Gas sales and transportation deliveries 
(000 therms):
Degree days (20-year average, 4,216)
Customers at year-end
Number of utility employees

1,126,084
4,232
560,067
1,261

1,123,287
4,325
540,931
1,284

4
(13)
(13)

(16)

11
(76)
(3)

(3)
1

(14)
(14)
1
1
6

0
(2)
4
(2)

Dividends paid on common stock
Payment date (per share)

February 15
May 15
August 15
November 15

Total dividends paid

DIVIDENDS PAID
PER SHARE

IN DOLLARS

$1.27

$1.26

$1.25

$1.24

$1.23

$1.22

$1.21

$1.20

$1.19

$1.18

$1.17

2002

2001

$       0.315
0.315
0.315
0.315
_________
$       1.260
_________
_________

$       0.310
0.310
0.310
0.315
_________
$       1.245
_________
_________

EARNINGS PER SHARE

IN DOLLARS

$2.00

$1.75

$1.50

$1.25

$1.00

$0.75

$0.50

$0.25

02

98

97

99

00

01
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
REDUCTION IN EARNINGS PER SHARE 
FROM INVESTMENT WRITEDOWNS:
– 50 cents per share in 1998 due to 

97

98

99

00

01

02

Annual dividends paid per share 
in 2002 increased for the 47th 
consecutive year, a growth record 
matched by few companies.

asset impairment charges

– 33 cents per share in 2002 due to a 

loss provision for PGE acquisition costs

Diluted earnings were $1.62 per 
share in 2002. Results include a 
33 cent per share loss provision 
for PGE acquisition costs.

Notice of Annual Meeting
The 2003 Annual Meeting will be held at 
2 p.m. Thursday, May 22, at the Portland
Hilton Hotel, 921 S.W. Sixth Avenue,
Portland, Oregon. A meeting notice and
proxy statement will be sent to all share-
holders in mid-April.

Form 10-K
The Company will provide its shareholders,
without charge, a copy of the 2002 Annual
Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and
Exchange Commission. Requests should be
made to the Corporate Secretary.

Stock Transfer Agent and Registrar
For all Preferred and Common Stock Issues:
NW Natural
220 N.W. Second Avenue
Portland, Oregon 97209
Attention: Shareholder Services

Trustee, Conversion and Interest 
Paying Agent
For Convertible Debentures:
The Bank of New York
Corporate Debt Operations, Floor 7-E
101 Barclay Street
New York, New York 10286
(800) 548-5075

Trustee and Bond Paying Agent
For all bond issues:
DB Services Tennessee Inc.
Security Holder Relations
P.O. Box 305050
Nashville, Tennessee 37230
(800) 735-7777

Common Stock Prices
The Company’s common stock is listed and
trades on the New York Stock Exchange
using the symbol NWN. The quarterly 
high and low trading range during 2001 
and 2002 was:

2002
Quarter

1
2
3
4

2001
Quarter

1
2
3
4

High

28.50
30.30
30.20
30.70

High

26.69
25.25
25.85
26.30

Low

24.20
27.60
23.46
25.50

Low

23.05
21.65
22.39
22.00

Dividend Reinvestment Plan
Common shareholders of record may 
reinvest all or part of their dividends in 
additional shares under the Company’s plan.
Cash purchases also may be made at the 
current market price under this plan, and 
no brokerage fees will be charged. A
prospectus will be sent to any registered
shareholder on request.

Dividend Payment Dates
February 15, 2003
May 15, 2003
August 15, 2003
November 14, 2003

Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited)

Dollars (thousands except per share amounts)

2002
Operating revenues
Net operating revenues
Net income (loss)
Basic earnings (loss) per share
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
2001
Operating revenues
Net operating revenues
Net income (loss)
Basic earnings (loss) per share
Diluted earnings (loss) per share

——–––––––– Quarter ended ——––––––––
Dec. 31
March 31

Sept. 30

June 30

278,563
110,666
34,447
1.34
1.32

217,341
91,653
25,907
1.00
0.99

101,873
56,564
(2,992)
(0.14)
(0.14)

118,150
54,726
4,865
0.17
0.17

78,717
38,059
(6,008)
(0.26)
(0.26)

78,359
37,067
(4,976)
(0.22)
(0.22)

182,223
82,255
18,345
0.70
0.69

236,402
92,565
24,391
0.94
0.93

Total

641,376
287,544
43,792
1.63*
1.62*

650,252
276,011
50,187
1.90*
1.88*

* Quarterly earnings per share are based upon the average number of common shares outstanding during each quarter. 
Because the average number of shares outstanding has changed in each quarter shown, the sum of quarterly earnings
may not equal earnings per share for the year. Variations in earnings between quarterly periods are due primarily to the
seasonal nature of the Company’s business.

James R. Boehlke
Investor Relations
(503) 721-2451
(800) 422-4012,
Ext. 2451

jrb@nwnatural.com

Linda R. Williams
Shareholder Services
(503) 220-2590
(800) 422-4012,
Ext. 3402

lrw@nwnatural.com

NW Natural
220 N.W. Second Avenue
Portland, Oregon 97209
(503) 226-4211
(800) 422-4012
www.nwnatural.com

Forward-looking statements
The Company’s future operating results will
be affected by various uncertainties and risk
factors, many of which are beyond the
Company’s control, including governmental
policy and regulatory action, the competitive
environment, economic factors and weather
conditions. Some statements in this annual
report may be forward-looking, and actual
results may differ materially as a result of
these uncertainties. For a more complete
description of these uncertainties and risk
factors, please refer to the Company’s filings
with the Securities and Exchange Commis-
sion on Forms 10-K and 10-Q.

n
o
t
a
e
B
e
c
u
r
B
o
t
o
h
P
5
1
P

i

l

e
n
v
e
L
e
r
i
a
C
o
t
o
h
P
2
1
P

n
o
t
a
e
B
e
c
u
r
B

s
r
e
c
i
f
f

O
&
d
r
a
o
B
,
r
e
t
t
e
L

r
e
d
l
o
h
e
r
a
h
S

/
t
i
a
r
t
r
o
P

d
n
a
l
r
o
B
e
i
l
r
a
h
C
y
h
p
a
r
g
o
t
o
h
P
e
r
u
t
a
e
F

l

s
n
o
i
t
u
o
S
c
i
h
p
a
r
G
n
g
i
s
e
D

k
c
o
t
s
d
e
l
c
y
c
e
r
n
o
d
e
t
n
i
r
P

r
e
t
n
e
C
s
t
r
A
c
i
h
p
a
r
G
g
n
i
t
n
i
r
P

n
g
i
s
e
D
n
o
e
h
p
a
r
G
n
o
i
t
c
u
d
o
r
P

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
CONTENTS

Page 8

Customer Satisfaction
It isn’t easy keeping customers happy as wholesale
gas prices fluctuate. In 2002, NW Natural main-
tained its reputation for exemplary customer ser-
vice and reasonable prices, and further increased
customer satisfaction.

Gas Storage
NW Natural’s underground and liquefied natural
gas storage facilities provided both cost savings
and added revenue, proving again that they are
major strategic assets for the Company.

Page 10

Mauricio Carcamo

Customer Growth
Despite a slow economy, NW Natural surpassed
its customer acquisition targets for 2002, adding
19,136 customers. The Company scored gains in
both the conversion and new construction markets.

Page 12

Kishore Duwadi

Mark Farley

Safety
In 2002, NW Natural stepped up its pipeline safety
and system security measures to meet federal
requirements and to assure safe, reliable service
to customers.

Page 14

Community Service
The spirit of community service is alive and well
at NW Natural. Employees contribute their time
and resources to good causes, and the Company
demonstrates a continuing commitment to good
corporate citizenship.

Lee Hughes

Letter to Shareholders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2

On the cover:

Page 16

Interview with the CEO . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5

NW  Natural  Meter  Reader  Rick

Corporate Governance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18

Brady has made fast friends with

Management’s Discussion & Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . 19

Cooper,  one  of  the  dogs  on  his

Report of Independent Accountants . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

meter reading route in Southwest

Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30

Notes to Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34

Portland.  His  secret? A  friendly
attitude — and Company-provided

Eleven-Year Financial Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44

dog biscuits. Says Brady: “We must

Corporate Officers  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52

never forget that each meter rep-

Board of Directors  . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54

resents a customer. I try to treat

Corporate Information. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55

their pets and property with care.”

Tonya Brumley

1

LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS

NW Natural President and Chief Executive Officer Mark Dodson (left) with Chairman of the Board Dick Reiten along Portland’s
waterfront. The Company’s headquarters is in the background.

Proud to Serve, Primed to Succeed

o Our Shareholders:
In any year, we would be pleased
to report strong earnings, high val-
ue to shareholders and excellent

customer service.

But we were especially proud of these
results in 2002 — a tumultuous year on
many fronts. Despite a weak economy and
a difficult year for the energy industry, NW
Natural achieved solid operating results.
During the year, our customers con-
tinued to receive excellent service. We also
saved substantially on gas costs, providing
rate relief to customers while still adding
to the bottom line. At mid-year we termi-
nated the Portland General Electric (PGE)
acquisition to avoid major risks associated
with the transaction. We provided storage
services to new interstate customers. And
we managed our way through some un-
usually warm weather in the fourth quarter.

Though the year was challenging, we
stayed focused on our core business ac-
tivities. At the same time, we continued
our commitment to the highest standards
of ethical business conduct with our cus-
tomers, shareholders and business part-
ners. We believe our reputation for fair-
ness and honesty is a significant strength
for NW Natural.
A year of accomplishments
In 2002, NW Natural:

– Earned $1.62 a diluted share including
the effects of charges related to the PGE
acquisition effort, or $1.95 a share before
these charges.
– Added 19,136 customers, growing our
customer base by more than 3 percent for
the 16th consecutive year.
– Gained approval from Oregon regula-
tors for a conservation tariff to help sta-
bilize margin revenues while better align-

ing the Company’s financial interests with
customers’ conservation goals.
– Exceeded 2001 customer additions from
residential and commercial conversions
and residential new construction, despite
weak economic conditions.
– Expanded service in the interstate gas
storage market, with earnings in this seg-
ment increasing to 14 cents a share from
8 cents a share in 2001.
– Refunded $33 million to customers
while adding 26 cents a share to earnings
from savings on the cost of purchased
natural gas.
– Lowered rates by an average of nearly
12 percent across all customer classes.
– Elected to terminate the October 2001
contract to acquire PGE in light of the risks
associated with the subsequent bankrupt-
cy of PGE’s parent company, Enron Corp.
– Paid dividends on common stock of

2

$1.26 a share, making 2002 the 47th con-
secutive year in which the Company’s div-
idend payments have increased.
PGE decisions made thoughtfully,
prudently

Given the turmoil in the energy in-
dustry, it was particularly important in
2002 that NW Natural make decisions
about its future with thorough knowledge
and care. Nowhere was this more evident
than in the Company’s decisions regard-
ing the acquisition of PGE.

In October 2001, NW Natural had en-
tered into a contract with Enron Corp. to
purchase PGE. Two months later, Enron
filed for bankruptcy, turning a sound ac-
quisition opportunity into a transaction
with significant unknown potential risks.
Those risks threatened the benefits we had
expected to achieve from the acquisition.
On May 16, 2002, NW Natural and Enron
jointly announced an agreement to termi-
nate the purchase contract.

GAS SALES AND
TRANSPORTATION
DELIVERIES

IN MILLIONS OF THERMS 

1,350

1,200

1,050

900

750

600

450

300

150

92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02

RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND 
INDUSTRIAL FIRM SALES
INDUSTRIAL INTERRUPTIBLE SALES
TRANSPORTATION

Gas sales and transportation deliv-
eries were 1.126 billion therms in 
2002, the fourth highest in NW 
Natural’s history.

Rate proposal addresses 
increased costs

We paid close attention in 2002 to
strengthening the foundation of our busi-
ness to help ensure future success.

Commission (OPUC). As part of that case,
we requested rate recovery for increased
costs in several key areas, including:
– Pension, insurance and health benefit
costs, and
– Costs related to new federal regulations,
including pipeline integrity and operator
qualifications.

In addition, we asked for recovery of
significant system investments planned
for the next several years. These include
the extension of a transmission pipeline
that connects to our Mist underground
storage facilities, and a new distribution
system in Coos County on the southern
Oregon coast.

In anticipation of this filing, we set the
stage for collaboration by holding work-
shops with representatives of industrial,
commercial and residential consumers, as
well as the OPUC staff.

We undertook a collaborative approach
in order to eliminate surprises and pave
the way for a healthy discussion of major
issues. We hope to receive an OPUC deci-
sion in time for new rates to take effect by
Oct. 1, 2003.
Tariff encourages energy efficiency

We worked to stabilize our revenues

in another way, as well.

Our customers have seen several years
of double-digit percentage energy rate
increases, prompting many of them to re-
duce their energy use. Meanwhile, our
fixed costs were rising.

In 2001, we filed for a new regulato-
ry mechanism called the “conservation
tariff,” aimed at addressing the price elas-
ticity problem. We know that customers
want to reduce their energy use when faced
with higher prices. The tariff, approved by
the OPUC in September 2002, protects
shareholders while supporting customers’
interest in conservation.

The mechanism adjusts residential
and commercial rates annually so the Com-
pany can recover its fixed costs in the face
of variable consumption patterns. A par-
tial decoupling tool based on conservation
trends separates the Company’s profits
from its sales volumes.

In November 2002, we filed a gener-
al rate case with the Oregon Public Utility

With the conservation tariff in effect,
NW Natural can promote energy efficien-

cy while reducing margin losses from
lower gas use. The Company recovered
$5.2 million in the last quarter of 2002 as
a result of these mechanisms.

TOTAL CUSTOMERS

IN THOUSANDS

600

550

500

450

400

350

300

92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02

NW Natural added 19,136 new 
customers in 2002, expanding our 
customer base by 3.5 percent. In 
the past 10 years, NW Natural
has added more than 200,000 
new customers.

Assuring profitable growth

Knowing and controlling our costs has
become an ingrained part of the way we
do business.

NW Natural is one of the few natural
gas distribution companies with great
growth potential in both the new con-
struction and conversion segments. Our
challenge has been to add customers effi-
ciently and profitably. We can say confi-
dently that we are meeting that challenge.
We have been very successful in re-
ducing construction costs. One cost-saver
is the Unity program, providing for the
joint installation of gas, electric and tele-
communication services. In 2002, about
70 percent of new homes in the territory
served jointly by PGE and NW Natural
were connected with Unity. A new con-
struction hookup using Unity costs about
47 percent less than adding service to a
new home using conventional techniques.
On the customer acquisition side, re-
search and more efficient targeted market-
ing are helping NW Natural add conver-
sion customers more cost-effectively. As a
result of new construction and marketing
strategies, average construction cost per
meter dropped from $1,136 in 2000 to $885
in 2002, a reduction of about 22 percent.

3

Customer service is key

Adding customers profitably is critical
to us — but so is keeping them satisfied.
Through monthly surveys, we keep
close tabs on customer satisfaction. In re-
sponse to customer comments, employee
teams work continuously to improve serv-
ice. In 2002, our service technicians and
customer account representatives (phone
reps) received the highest satisfaction rat-
ings since the surveys began.

Last fall, all phone reps participated
in a training program focused on working
with customers on the most difficult is-
sues, such as credit problems and high
bills. Although the on-hold times were
longer than in past years, customer satis-
faction increased.

NUMBER OF CUSTOMERS
SERVED BY EACH
OPERATING EMPLOYEE

800

700

600

500

400

300

200

100

92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02

Each operating employee served an 
average 714 customers in 2002, a 63 
percent increase from 437 customers 
served in 1992.

Service technicians routinely earn high
customer satisfaction marks, but they were
particularly high in 2002. Eighty percent of
respondents gave them “excellent” ratings.
We attribute these high scores to increased
customer service training and a computer-
based scheduling system that improved
service techs’ ability to reach customers’
homes within scheduled time windows.
Opportunities for the future

With the basics of our Company in
excellent shape, we have the opportunity
to grow in our core business while explor-
ing new ventures that complement the dis-
tribution business. As always, our future
success will depend on our ability to an-
ticipate and manage change.

4

Mist. Since 1989, when NW Natural
began storing natural gas in depleted gas
reservoirs at Mist, Ore., the storage field
has proven its value. Today, Mist’s pools help
the Company keep down commodity and
transportation costs. Last year, sales of in-
terstate storage services and related activ-
ities added 14 cents a share to earnings —
up from 8 cents a share the previous year.
NW Natural is expanding Mist to
provide more storage for core utility cus-
tomers, and in the process will add to
Mist’s potential in the interstate storage
market. We will double daily deliverabil-
ity while augmenting capacity for work-
ing gas from 11 billion cubic feet (Bcf) to
17 Bcf by 2008.

As natural gas demand grows and
prices fluctuate, storage will continue to
help NW Natural stabilize rates and guar-
antee supply while generating income.

Distributed generation. The energy
industry has long discussed natural gas-
fueled distributed generation. Today, the
conditions exist to move theory into prac-
tice. NW Natural is already leading the
charge.

In December 2001, NW Natural in-
stalled a distributed generation pilot proj-
ect — a gas-fired microturbine providing
electricity and waste heat to a downtown
Portland office building. The project at-
tracted national attention to the potential
for distributed generation. In 2002, NW
Natural and its consortium partners lined
up 15 prospective projects featuring mi-
croturbines and fuel cells.

At this writing, a 5 kilowatt gas-pow-
ered fuel cell is ready to start operating at
a juvenile detention center. A local college
wants a microturbine to generate electric-
ity and waste heat. And an aquatics center
is considering a combined solar/microtur-
bine system to help cut its energy costs.
Many similar projects are in the wings.

Pipeline integrity. In the last days of
the 2002 session of Congress, lawmakers
passed the Pipeline Safety Improvement
Act. The Act directs pipeline owners to
monitor transmission pipelines aggres-
sively for corrosion and other potential
safety hazards.

NW Natural will have up to 10 years to

inspect transmission pipelines that fall
in “high-consequence areas,” as defined
by the Act. The Company expects to spend
more than $100 million over 10 years to
comply. Much of that will be spent mod-
ifying pipelines to allow the passage of
“smart pigs”— sophisticated monitor-
ing equipment that travels through the
pipelines.

NW Natural has a superb safety re-
cord. In every aspect of pipeline safety, we
meet or exceed safety guidelines. As the
Company gears up to respond to new fed-
eral expectations, we believe that state
regulators will support our pipeline in-
tegrity program by granting rate recovery
for these expensive federal mandates.
The first and last word

This annual report marks a transition
at NW Natural from one CEO to another.
Both of us have been honored to be select-
ed to serve in that capacity. We are proud
of what the Company has accomplished
and humbled by the faith that has been
placed in us to keep the legacy intact.

That legacy is due in large part to NW
Natural’s employees. Their performance
in 2002, as in previous years, was stellar —
controlling costs while achieving excellent
customer service ratings, demonstrating
their qualifications for ensuring pipeline
safety — and much more.

Our greatest pride comes from the
privilege of working with this remarkable
group of men and women. Their hard work,
dedication and integrity ensure a bright
future for NW Natural.

We look forward to continuing to serve
you in the years ahead. Thank you for your
confidence in us and for sharing our pride
in NW Natural.

Richard G. Reiten
Chairman of the Board

Mark S. Dodson
President and Chief Executive Officer
March 24, 2003

Interview with the CEO

It’s All About Value

How does NW Natural provide value to 
its shareholders?
Mr. Dodson: Our goal is to provide incompara-
ble value to our shareholders as well as to the

customers and communities we serve.

We are both a growth company and a value-based
stock. That means we can offer our shareholders earn-
ings growth as well as a stable investment. We’ve faced
some significant challenges in the past several years,
as have most companies in our industry. Yet we’ve al-
ways come through with strong earnings, a positive
growth record and, perhaps as important as anything,
our integrity.

Shareholders benefit from our strong stock price,
reliable dividend payments which have increased every
year for 47 consecutive years, and the fact that we are
adding customers at a pace more than twice the na-
tional average.

Company President and CEO Mark Dodson (right) talks with employ-
ees in the Customer Call Center in Portland. From foreground to
background are Brian Cunnington, customer service representative;
Judi Hall, supervisor of customer communications; and Pat Elmore,
customer service representative.

Q. What are the Company’s growth prospects?
Mr. Dodson: Unlike most natural gas distribution companies, we have relatively low market share. At the same time, natural gas con-
tinues to be the preferred fuel for energy consumers. So in our core business, the customer growth prospects are excellent.

Beyond that, we are exploring possibilities in distributed generation and other ventures that build on what we know how to do.

We will consider new ventures only if they fit well with our core competencies.

The growth opportunities in interstate gas storage are especially exciting. As the pressures on gas supplies increase, storage be-
comes all the more valuable. This year we nearly doubled our earnings from interstate storage services, and there is room for more.
Of course, we remain alert to possibilities for acquiring additional assets. But we won’t get involved in anything unless we are

absolutely sure the financials are solid and that it makes good sense for our shareholders and customers.

Q. How are you helped or hindered by regulation?
Mr. Dodson: We are fortunate at NW Natural that we enjoy positive and productive relationships with regulatory agencies in both
Oregon and Washington. Even though we sometimes see things differently, we trust and respect one another enough to be able to
work together and negotiate fairly and openly.

A good example of this relationship is the way we prepared for the filing of our Oregon general rate case in November. Prior
to the filing, we held discussions with regulatory staff as well as various customer interest groups. We wanted to establish good com-
munication and a collaborative approach so there would be no surprises when we made the filing, and so the case could proceed as
smoothly as possible.

Q. Why is the Oregon rate case important to you, and what are you expecting from it?
Mr. Dodson: The rate case is extremely important because, among other things, it requests rate recovery for some major investments
we feel are critical to NW Natural’s future and to serving our customers. Among these are investments totaling about $90 million
to extend our South Mist pipeline to connect with the interstate pipeline, which will help assure reliable supplies for customers in
the fast-growing parts of our region. We are also seeking rate recovery for a $12 million project to build a new distribution system
in Coos County — an area that desperately needs economic development. And we have requested a regulatory mechanism to recover
the significant costs involved in complying with the new federal pipeline integrity act.

NW Natural has been running extremely lean over the past several years. We want to keep our standing as one of the most ef-

ficient natural gas utilities in the nation — but we don’t want to be so bare bones that we risk either safety or reliability.

5

Going Above

and Beyond

There’s a special spirit at NW Natural.You see it in the way
employees care about each other, the way they serve customers
and the way they help their communities.

It  is  a  spirit  borne  of  pride — the  pride  that  comes  from
working for a 144-year-old company known for its high values
and integrity, its outstanding customer service and its good
corporate citizenship.

NW  Natural  could  not  succeed  without  the  people  of  the
Northwest. For that reason, the Company and its employees
seek ways to give back — whether through a friendly voice on
the phone, expert technical help or corporate support for a com-
munity event.

We’re here to serve.

NW  Natural  tents  add  a  glow  to  the  summertime  gathering  of  about
15,000 people at Portland’s annual Waterfront Classics performance. NW
Natural co-sponsors the event, which features the Oregon Symphony and
fireworks along the Willamette River.

CUSTOMER SATISFACTION

Name:
Location:
Job title:
NWN service:

Mauricio Carcamo
Eugene, OR
Service Technician
11 years

Eugene Service Technician Mauricio Carcamo frequently receives customer commendations for his superlative
service. Above, he arrives at the home of customer Debbie Steinman to check her gas equipment. “I just go by the
Golden Rule,” says Carcamo. “Do unto others the way you would have them do unto you. I try to treat the customer
the way I would like to be treated.”

8

Satisfying
our customers with exemplary service

side from safe and reliable service, two things mat-
ter most to NW Natural customers: being charged
a reasonable price and receiving good service.

In customer satisfaction surveys, NW Natural

consistently outranks its competitors on both fronts.
Gas prices a factor

In recent years, overall customer satisfaction declined
a few percentage points mainly due to price increases from
higher wholesale gas costs. However, in 2002, those ratings
improved as the year went on.

NW Natural finished the year with customer satisfac-
tion ratings of “excellent” (i.e., overall service ratings of 9
or 10 on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the highest) from
58.3 percent of customers surveyed, up from 57.8 percent
in 2001. The percentage of “satisfied” NW Natural cus-
tomers, which includes ratings of 7 through 10, exceeded
86 percent.

Two factors in particular contributed to the higher lev-
els of customer satisfaction: gas price reductions and im-
proved service.

Thanks to reductions in wholesale gas costs, NW Natural
was able to refund $30 million in gas cost savings to its
Oregon customers. The refund was accomplished through
a credit on customers’ June bills. Thank-you notes flood-
ed  into  the  Company,  with  customers  expressing  senti-
ments such as: “I wish all utilities were as nice as you,” and
“Thank you for always looking out for our best interests!”
In October, the Company went further and reduced its

rates for both Oregon and Washington customers.
Employees shine in service ratings

NW Natural’s monthly customer surveys showed that
customers’ ratings of their interactions with NW Natural
employees improved even when prices were up. Customer
service  ratings  reached  record  highs  in  2002  as  prices
came down.

Customers’ ratings  of  their  interactions  with  NW
Natural’s customer service representatives, who provide
telephone service, improved from 72 percent “excellent” at
the start of the year to 75 percent by year-end, also a record
high. Customers’ ratings of their interactions with the Com-
pany’s customer service technicians, who conduct onsite

visits  to  help  customers  with
equipment  or  service  needs,
reached an all-time high of 84
percent “excellent” in 2002.
Outshining the competition

Since  NW  Natural  began

Customer satisfaction
improved as gas
prices came down.
Company employees
also received record-
high ratings for their
customer service.

tracking customer satisfaction, the Company has consis-
tently outperformed its competition — specifically, electric
utilities — in satisfaction surveys. Last year, the satisfac-
tion gap widened between the “excellent” ratings for NW
Natural and the average for all electric providers in the
Company’s service area. The variance grew from a 13 per-
centage point advantage for NW Natural in 2001 to a 16.6
percentage  point  advantage  in  2002.  Of  the  16  electric
providers  in  the  Company’s  service  territory,  only  one
earned  higher  customer  satisfaction  ratings  than  NW
Natural in 2002.

Surveys in 2002 also showed that some 60 percent of
customers still consider natural gas to be the home ener-
gy source with the best overall value. Electricity was the
second choice at 12 percent.

Partnering to Meet Customer Needs

NW Natural’s Lincoln City Utility Coordinator Judy Thompson
reviews building plans for the new Summit Ridge subdivision
with Dan James, owner of Northwest Homes. NW Natural works
closely with builders to coordinate construction and ensure the
smooth installation of natural gas service.

9

Storing
valuable resources for customers and the region

NW Natural is achieving
cost savings and
additional revenues 
by expanding its under-
ground and liquefied
natural gas storage
activities.

ith  today’s  price  vola-
tility  and  competition
for  interstate  pipeline
space, storage is a crit-
ical asset in the natural gas industry.
NW Natural’s underground storage
and  liquefied  natural  gas  (LNG)
plants help the Company keep down

gas costs while generating additional revenue.
Pipeline project moves forward

NW Natural is in the process of extending the transmis-
sion pipeline that connects the Mist underground gas storage
field to the Company’s distribution system west and south
of Portland. The South Mist Pipeline Extension (SMPE) will

The Added Value of LNG

NW Natural sells liquefied natural gas to other local gas dis-
tributors to supplement their supplies. Above, Portland LNG
Plant Operator Teri Carl adjusts the pressure that delivers
LNG from the trailer into the ambient vaporizing unit. The
vaporizer warms the LNG back into gaseous form for use in
the distribution system.

10

serve some of the state’s fastest growing communities as
well as connecting to the interstate pipeline system.

The SMPE project involved one of the most complicat-
ed energy siting proceedings ever conducted by Oregon’s
Energy Facility Siting Council (EFSC). Following two years
of review of NW Natural’s application, including extensive
public  involvement,  the  EFSC  granted  a  permit  for  the
project, with conditions, on March 13, 2003. The Company
hopes to begin construction in the summer of 2003 and to
have the entire pipeline extension in service in time for the
winter of 2004-05.
Interstate storage attracts customers

In 2002, NW Natural increased the number of interstate
storage  customers  to  six  firm  and  two  interruptible  cus-
tomers. The Company began interstate storage sales in 2001
with four firm customers. In 2002, NW Natural marketed
about  one  Bcf  of  new  working  gas  capacity  to  new  and
existing customers.

NW Natural signed a contract with Entergy-Koch Trad-
ing,  LP,  to  trade  temporarily  available  storage  and  trans-
portation capacity in the interstate market. Aquila Energy
had performed this “optimization” service for NW Natural
before leaving the trading business. Interstate storage and op-
timization services contributed 14 cents a share to the Com-
pany’s 2002 earnings compared to 8 cents a share in 2001.
LNG — a versatile commodity

NW Natural built its two LNG plants to ensure a sup-
ply cushion in the event of pipeline disruptions or extremely
cold weather. But liquefied natural gas — coupled with spe-
cialized transport vehicles — is both versatile and valuable.
In 2002, BC Gas in Vancouver, British Columbia, need-
ed a supply of LNG to fuel a remote lumber mill when its
own LNG plant closed for maintenance. NW Natural sold
LNG and leased its 10,000-gallon trailer to the Canadian
company, which purchased more than 130 trailer loads over
eight months.

NW Natural also uses LNG trailers to keep natural gas
flowing to customers during transmission line repairs. The
Company has used a 500-gallon trailer to allow industrial
customers  a  chance  to  test  natural  gas  before  switching
fuels for their plants, resulting in added year-round load.

GAS STORAGE

Name:
Location:
Job title:
NWN service:

Kishore Duwadi
Miller Station, Mist, OR
Supervising Engineer, Gas Storage
11 years

Kishore Duwadi supervises operations at NW Natural’s underground gas storage facilities at Mist to help assure
reliable gas supplies to customers. Mist is the only commercial gas-producing field in the Pacific Northwest, and its
gas resources continue to be explored and developed. “The employees here are all very helpful and team-oriented,”
says Duwadi. “We take pride in running the plant without any significant down time. When the demand is there,
we do everything we can to meet the customers’ needs.”

11

Growing
our customer base through targeted efforts

The Company
exceeded most of 
its customer growth
targets for 2002, with
particularly strong
growth in residential
conversions.

W Natural added 19,136 cus-
tomers in 2002, some 18 per-
cent  more  than  projected  at
the start of the year.

Solid results in new construction

New residential construction got a
boost from low interest rates. Natural
gas typically captures 90-plus percent
of the new construction market. The Company exceeded
its residential new construction targets by 24 percent.

New construction in the commercial sector grew at a
slower pace, reflecting a slower economy. However, NW
Natural still reached 97 percent of its target for new con-
struction commercial customers.

The Company achieved its growth goals in multifam-
ily  housing. Although  new  construction  of  multifamily
units was slower than 2001, NW Natural attracted a high-
er share of that market. The shift was attributed to NW
Natural’s targeted work with architects and engineers ear-

Rewarding Builders for Going Gas

NW  Natural  employees  (standing)  Kathy  Dolezal  and  Paul
Corso serve real estate agents at a Company-sponsored open
house lunch in Vancouver, Washington. NW Natural sponsors
the builder/real estate agent open houses for new homes that
feature natural gas dryer stubs in addition to natural gas heat-
ing, water heating, ranges and hearth products. The program
is  intended  to  increase  awareness  about  the  advantages  of
building homes ready for natural gas dryers.

12

ly in their design of multifamily projects.
Conversions come on strong

While new construction results were favorable in 2002,
it  was  residential  conversions  that  stole  the  show.  The
number of residents who converted to natural gas was 29
percent higher than had been projected.

Consumer Services General Manager Grant Yoshihara
said the dramatic increase in conversions was due to three
factors: 1) a targeted approach for identifying and mar-
keting to customers who live on existing mains, who can
be acquired profitably and who have a high likelihood of
converting; 2) a successful partnership with heating, ven-
tilation  and  air  conditioning  (HVAC)  distributors  and
dealers; and 3) a widening price advantage for natural gas
vs. electricity.

NW  Natural  is  using  an  updated  financial  model  to
ensure that customer growth is profitable. The model is
based on cash flow and includes a probabilities analysis
that provides the Company with better estimates of con-
version potential.

“The result is that we are achieving strong customer
growth  that  is  meeting  our  requirements  for  return  on
equity invested,” said Yoshihara.
Partnership pays off

NW Natural is partnering with HVAC distributors and
dealers for advertising and promotion. NW Natural dis-
tributes  sales  leads  based  on  a  performance-tracking
model that rewards dealers for closing sales and meeting
customer expectations. The result has been an increase in
the sales-to-lead ratio and a reduction in the costs of gen-
erating a sales lead.

Commercial customers also switched to natural gas in
2002, largely because of its price advantages. Gas prices
came  down  while  electricity  prices  remained  high. The
Company exceeded its target for commercial conversions
by 7 percent.

Customers in two areas within NW Natural’s service
territory — Vancouver, Washington and Eugene, Oregon —
were particularly influenced by the widening price advan-
tage of natural gas. In Vancouver, for example, the cost of
heating a home with electricity was 58 percent higher than
the cost of heating with natural gas.

CUSTOMER GROWTH

Name:
Location:
Job title:
NWN service:

Mark Farley
Portland, OR
Main Crew Leader
14 years

Construction employees who connect conversion customers to NW Natural’s distribution system are committed
to leaving the customer’s property looking at least as good as they found it. “When we leave a job, hopefully people
won’t even know we’ve been there,” says Crew Leader Mark Farley, shown above restoring landscaping after a con-
version service installation in east Portland.

13

SAFETY

Name:
Location:
Job Title:
NWN service:

Lee Hughes
Salem, OR
Distribution Crew Leader
25 years

Distribution Crew Leader Lee Hughes works with fellow Salem crew members Ron Brown and Foo Ma (back-
ground, left to right) to replace old bare steel pipe along Highway 99E with new polyethylene or coated steel pipe.
“The new pipe eliminates leakage and increases transmission capacity,” said Hughes. “We can run higher pres-
sure gas through it, and it has a larger diameter. So it is not only safer, but also allows us to serve more customers.”

14

Protecting
pipelines, employees and the public

afety remained a NW Natural priority in 2002, as
the Company continued improving its infrastruc-
ture  and  construction  practices. The  Company’s
safety experts also tightened security, as the nation’s

utilities responded to the threat of terrorism.
Retrofitting for safety

In 2002, NW Natural replaced more than five miles of
bare steel pipelines, ranging from 3/4-inch service lines to
8-inch mains, with coated steel or polyethylene pipe. This
began the second phase of an ongoing effort to replace
aging pipelines. The Company eliminated all of its origi-
nal cast iron pipes, some of them nearly 100 years old, in
a 15-year project completed in 2000.

An agreement with the Oregon Public Utility Commis-
sion allowed the Company to recover about $3 million of its
2002 bare steel replacement costs. In addition, NW Natural
is allowed to recover costs for its aggressive geohazard
program. In 2002, the Company spent about $1.5 million
inspecting,  analyzing  and  protecting  transmission  lines
from landslides and other potential geological hazards.
Employees demonstrate safety qualifications

In 1999, the U.S. Department of Transportation adopt-
ed the Operator Qualification (OQ) Rule. The regulation
calls for pipeline operators to demonstrate that their em-
ployees and contractors are qualified to perform certain
tasks affecting pipeline safety.

Over the next three years, NW Natural involved em-
ployees and supervisors in identifying 220 “covered tasks”
under the OQ Rule. The Company then administered 22,000
individual  assessments  (written  tests  and  performance
evaluations) to 695 employees. All employees and con-
tractors  who  perform  covered  tasks  qualified  under  the
federal rule by the Oct. 28, 2002 deadline.

NW Natural will assess the skills of new employees
and routinely re-qualify current employees. In addition,
covered tasks will be added, deleted or modified as con-
struction processes evolve.
Responding to a post-9/11 world

Shortly  after  Sept.  11,  2001,  NW  Natural  created  a
Homeland  Security  Committee  to  review  and  improve
security procedures at NW Natural facilities.

From replacing old
pipe to strengthening
security, NW Natural
provides for the safety
of its customers,
employees and local
communities.

One of the committee’s first
actions was to contract with an
experienced security specialist
who  assessed  security  at  the
Company’s headquarters, serv-
ice centers, district offices and
other  facilities.  In  2002,  the  Company  started  imple-
menting  the  consultant’s  recommendations,  which  in-
cluded  strengthening  security  protocol  and  making
physical changes at key facilities. These efforts will con-
tinue in 2003.

NW Natural invested in new gates, fencing and control
monitors  at  critical  locations.  Management  established
and  trained  employees  in  new  measures  for  restricting
access  to  Company  facilities.  The  Homeland  Security
Committee kept employees informed of national security
alerts and raised employee awareness of security concerns
at all levels of the Company.

Inspecting the Pipe

Federal and state regulators work with NW Natural to inspect
pipelines for safety. Above (left to right) are Al Jones, pipeline
safety engineer with the Washington Utilities and Transporta-
tion Commission; NW Natural Design Engineer Jodi Wright
and Chief Engineer Bruce Paskett; and Steve Rieger, engineer
with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Office of Pipeline
Safety.

15

COMMUNITY SERVICE

Names:

Location:
Job Titles:

NWN service:

Tonya Brumley (front);
Mindi Thayer (background)
The Dalles, OR
Customer Acquisition Coordinator;
District Manager
5 years; 8 years

The spirit of community service is strong and ever-present at NW Natural. Above, Tonya Brumley and Mindi
Thayer of the Company’s office in The Dalles supervise flower planting in a city park with the Brownie Scout Troop
they co-lead. “My goal is to teach the girls the importance of giving,” says Brumley. “Whether it be in time, money or
sharing, we can have fun together when we give to others.”

16

Serving
our communities, for today and the future

or NW Natural and its employees, the idea of serv-
ice goes beyond supplying a safe, reliable fuel. The
Company builds community involvement into its
programs and budgets. Individual employees show
dedication to their communities by contributing time to
causes important to them.
Volunteerism encouraged

NW  Natural  employees  love  to  volunteer  for  good
causes. Company employees serve as volunteer mentors,
theater board members, Special Olympics coaches, tutors
and much more. Employees are equally generous financial
supporters of programs they care about.

To  support  and  encourage  community  involvement,
NW Natural invites employees to participate in the Dollars
for Doers program. Applicants submit entries describing
the organizations to which they contribute either time or
money. The Company responds with cash contributions.
Contributions support community programs

Each year, NW Natural contributes one percent of net
earnings to charity. In 2002, philanthropic priorities in-
cluded three sectors that are critical to Northwest commu-
nities: affordable housing, education and quality of life/
environmental protection. While most of the Company’s
contributions are made at the corporate level, NW Natural
sets aside individual funds for district managers to support
local community activities.

In addition to cash, NW Natural’s contributions of per-
sonnel  and  products  support  community  organizations.
The Company’s cook wagons are visible at fund-raisers
and other charitable activities year-round. Canopies with
the Company logo can be seen at concerts, athletic events
and warm-weather festivals.

As  in  previous  years,  the  Company’s  2002  annual
charitable campaign proved to be a successful way to en-
courage  employee  philanthropy.  Last  year,  employees
gave $181,000 to the United Way, Black United Fund and
Earth Share of Oregon.
Company demonstrates community leadership

NW  Natural  takes  its  responsibilities  to  Northwest
communities seriously. That’s why executives and other

employees share expertise with
governments at all levels on crit-
ical policy issues and projects.

The Company and
its employees
reach out to meet
community needs.

In  2002,  NW  Natural  managers  helped  the  City  of
Portland in efforts to address problems such as a trouble-
some  computer  system  and  a  development  permitting
process that needed to be more user-friendly.

Also in 2002, Chairman and CEO Dick Reiten chaired
the Oregon Business Plan Committee, a group of business
people eager to help the state find the most direct way
out of its economic slump. The planning effort culminat-
ed in a December conference sponsored by Oregon’s gov-
ernor-elect and two U.S. senators, moderated by Reiten
and attended by 1,300 business and government leaders.

Helping Those in Need

Volunteers  provide  meals  to  clients  at  Transition  Projects,
which  helps  Multnomah  County  residents  meet  their  basic
needs for shelter, food, clothing and physical and emotional
health. Serving residents at the agency’s Clark Center facili-
ty in Portland are (left to right) TPI Executive Director Doreen
Binder;  TPI  Board  Member  and  NW  Natural  Residential
Consumer Services Manager Mark Forker; and TPI Volunteer
Coordinator Beth Gergick. Residents being served are (left to
right) Allan Williams, Ronald Barr and Brad Brotherton.

17

Governance
by NW Natural Board members

Board creates new
committees to
assure NW Natural’s
compliance with
governance and
ethics requirements.

W Natural’s Board of Direc-
tors  took  steps  in  2002  to
improve  its  effectiveness  in
guiding the Company. It re-
structured its Executive Committee to
become  the  Governance  Committee
and  created  the  new  Public  Affairs
Committee.  These  committees,  together  with  the  Audit
Committee, will help carry out the Board’s and Company’s
responsibilities under new federal mandates.

The Governance Committee, composed entirely of in-
dependent directors, establishes criteria for Board and com-
mittee  membership;  establishes  policies  that  govern  the
Board’s activities, including meeting structure and content;
and evaluates the Board, committees and individual direc-
tor performance. It also reviews annually the performance
of the CEO and considers any questions of possible con-
flicts of interest of Board members and senior executives.
The Audit Committee, also composed entirely of inde-
pendent  directors,  is  responsible  for  overseeing  matters

related to accounting, financial reporting, internal control,
auditing and regulatory compliance. During 2002, the Audit
Committee expanded its meeting schedule and established
new  procedures  to  ensure  the  continuing  integrity  of  the
Company’s financial reports.

The Public Affairs Committee is responsible for review-
ing NW Natural’s policies and practices relating to signifi-
cant public and political issues that may have an impact on
the Company’s business operations, financial performance
or  public  image.  It  oversees  NW  Natural’s  programs  and
policies relating to civic, charitable and community affairs,
safety and health, and equal employment opportunity. The
Committee makes recommendations to the Board to ensure
that the Company fulfills its objectives in a manner consis-
tent with the responsibilities of good corporate citizenship.
By  reviewing  its  existing  practices,  examining  and
adopting  the  best  practices  of  other  companies  and  chal-
lenging the Company to meet the highest standards of con-
duct, the Board has actively responded to rapid changes in
the corporate environment.

Overseeing Corporate Governance

Governance  Committee  members  Randy  Papé, Melody Teppola, Wayne  Kuni  (chair), Dick Woolworth, Russ Tromley  and Tod
Hamachek are responsible for matters of corporate governance, including Board membership, meeting structure and content, and
Board and director performance.

18

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION 
AND ANALYSIS

T he following is management’s assessment of Northwest Natural Gas

Company’s financial condition including the principal factors that
affect results of operations. The discussion refers to the consolidated
activities of the Company for the three years ended Dec. 31, 2002.
References in this discussion to “Notes” are to the notes to the con-
solidated financial statements.

The consolidated financial statements include:

Regulated utility:

■ Northwest Natural Gas Company (NW Natural)
Non-regulated wholly-owned subsidiary businesses:

■ NNG Financial Corporation (Financial Corporation), 
and its wholly-owned subsidiaries
■ Northwest Energy Corporation (Northwest Energy), 
and its wholly-owned subsidiary

Non-regulated majority-owned subsidiary business:

■ Canor Energy, Ltd. (Canor), sold in 2000
Together these businesses are referred to herein as the “Company”

(see “Non-utility Operations,” below, and Note 2).

HIGHLIGHTS

Among its accomplishments in 2002, the Company:

■ grew the utility customer base by more than 3 percent for the 16th
year in a row, adding 19,136 customers to NW Natural’s gas distri-
bution system during the year;
■ exceeded the prior year’s customer additions from residential and
commercial conversions and residential new construction, despite
weaker economic conditions;

reduced rates for NW Natural’s customers in Oregon and Washington
due to lower purchased gas costs, and refunded $33 million to cus-
tomers from its savings on gas purchases in the past year;
■ expanded service in the interstate market for gas storage services,
increasing earnings from this business segment from 8 cents a share
in 2001 to 14 cents a share in 2002;

received approval from the Oregon Public Utility Commission (OPUC)
for rate adjustments and a partial decoupling mechanism that will
help stabilize margin revenues while better aligning NW Natural’s
financial interests with customers’ interests in conserving energy;

tested and successfully qualified, under a federally-mandated
Operator Qualification rule, all 695 NW Natural employees who work
on natural gas pipelines;
■ elected to terminate the October 2001 contract to acquire Portland
General Electric Company (PGE) in light of the risks associated with
the bankruptcy of PGE’s parent company, Enron Corp. (Enron); and
■ paid dividends on common stock of $1.26 a share, making 2002 the
47th consecutive year in which the Company’s dividend payments
have increased.

ISSUES AND CHALLENGES

Issues and challenges the Company expects to face in 2003, as dis-
cussed below, include the effects and uncertainties relating to a gen-
eral rate case in Oregon, volatile gas commodity prices, unusually
warm temperatures in the winter of 2002-03, continuing weak eco-
nomic conditions in Oregon and Washington, higher costs for pen-
sions, health benefits and insurance, uncertainties relating to the per-
mits and rights-of-way necessary for the planned extension of the
pipeline from NW Natural’s Mist gas storage field, and higher cap-
ital and maintenance costs due to federal mandates in the area of
pipeline integrity.

EARNINGS AND DIVIDENDS

The Company’s earnings applicable to common stock in 2002 were
$41.5 million, down from $47.8 million in both 2001 and 2000. Earn-
ings for 2002 were reduced by a loss provision of $8.4 million after
tax, representing the Company’s costs incurred in its effort to acquire
PGE from Enron.

Diluted earnings per share from consolidated operations were
$1.62 a share in 2002, down from $1.88 a share in both 2001 and
2000. Excluding the charges relating to the acquisition effort, dilut-
ed earnings per share from consolidated operations in 2002 would
have been $1.95 a share. Earnings for 2001 and 2000 were the high-
est and second highest on record for the Company. Earnings in 2000
included a gain of 9 cents a share from the sale of Canor.

NW Natural earned $1.76 a diluted share from gas utility opera-
tions in 2002, the same as the result from utility operations in 2001,
compared to $1.78 a share in 2000. Weather conditions in its service
territory in 2002 were very close to average for the year as a whole
but were 2 percent warmer than 2001. Temperatures in 2001 were 2 per-
cent warmer than 2000 and 3 percent colder than the 20-year average.
Weather in 2000 was 5 percent colder than the 20-year average.

Results in 2002 from the Company’s non-utility operations were
a loss of 14 cents a share, including earnings of 14 cents a share from
gas storage operations, charges equivalent to 33 cents a share relating
to the effort to purchase PGE, and earnings of 5 cents a share from
other subsidiary and non-utility operations. The charges relating to the
PGE transaction resulted from the termination effective July 1, 2002
of the Company’s contract to purchase PGE. Non-utility operating
results for 2001 were earnings of 12 cents a share, including 8 cents
a share from gas storage operations. Non-utility operating results for
2000 were earnings of 10 cents a share, including a gain of 9 cents a
share from the sale of Canor (see “Non-utility Operations,” below).
Dividends paid on common stock were $1.26 a share in 2002 com-

pared to $1.245 a share in 2001 and $1.24 a share in 2000.

APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

In preparing the Company’s financial statements using generally
accepted accounting principles in the United States of America
(GAAP), management exercises judgment in the selection and appli-
cation of accounting principles, including making estimates and
assumptions. Management considers its critical accounting policies
to be those which are most important to the representation of the
Company’s financial condition and results of operations and which
require management’s most difficult and subjective or complex judg-
ments, including those that could result in materially different amounts
if the Company reported under different conditions or using different
assumptions. The Company’s critical accounting policies are described
below. Other significant accounting policies and recent accounting pro-
nouncements are discussed in Note 1.
Regulatory Accounting

NW Natural generally uses the same accounting policies and prac-
tices used by unregulated companies for financial reporting under
GAAP. However, sometimes these principles, such as Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 71, “Accounting for the
Effects of Certain Types of Regulation,” require different accounting
treatment for regulated companies to show the effects of regulation.
For example, in setting NW Natural’s retail rates, the OPUC may not
allow NW Natural to charge its customers currently to recover certain
expenses, but instead may require that these expenses be charged to cus-
tomers in the future. In this situation, SFAS No. 71 requires NW Natural

N W N A T U R A L

19

■
■
■
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION 
AND ANALYSIS

to defer these items and show them as regulatory assets on the bal-
ance sheet until NW Natural is allowed to charge its customers. NW
Natural then amortizes these items as expense to the income state-
ment as the charges are recovered from customers. Similarly, certain
revenue items may be deferred as regulatory liabilities, which are
also eventually amortized to the income statement as rates to cus-
tomers are reduced.

The conditions a regulated company must satisfy to apply the

accounting policies and practices of SFAS No. 71 include:
■ an independent regulator sets rates;

the regulator sets the rates to cover specific costs of delivering serv-

ice; and

the service territory lacks competitive pressures to reduce rates

below the rates set by the regulator.

NW Natural applies SFAS No. 71 in accounting for its regulated
operations. The Company periodically assesses whether it can continue
to apply SFAS No. 71. If NW Natural should determine in the future
that all or a portion of its regulatory assets and liabilities no longer meet
the criteria for continued application of SFAS No. 71, then it would
be required to write off the net unrecoverable balances of its regula-
tory assets and liabilities as a charge to income.
Revenue Recognition

Utility revenues are derived primarily from the sale and transpor-
tation of natural gas. Utility revenue from gas sales and transporta-
tion is recognized when the gas is delivered to and received by the cus-
tomer. Estimated revenues are accrued for gas deliveries not billed to
customers from meter reading dates to month end (unbilled revenue)
and are reversed the following month when actual billings occur.

Revenues from non-utility services, including gas storage, are
recognized upon delivery of the service to customers. Revenues from
non-utility optimization contracts are recognized, after deducting for
regulatory revenue sharing, over the life of the contract for amounts
guaranteed under the contract, or as amounts are earned and rea-
sonably estimable for amounts above the guaranteed value.
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

The Company adopted SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities,” on Jan. 1, 2001. This statement
established accounting and reporting standards for derivative instru-
ments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other
contracts, and for hedging activities. SFAS No. 133 requires that an
entity recognize derivatives as either assets or liabilities on the bal-
ance sheet and measure those instruments at fair value. SFAS No.
133 also requires that changes in the fair value of a derivative be rec-
ognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria
are met.

NW Natural’s Derivatives Policy sets forth the guidelines for using
selected financial derivative products to support prudent risk man-
agement strategies within designated parameters (see Note 1). NW
Natural’s primary hedging activities, consisting of natural gas com-
modity price and foreign currency exchange rate hedges, are princi-
pally accounted for as cash flow hedges under SFAS No. 133 and sub-
ject to regulatory deferral pursuant to SFAS No. 71. Unrealized gains
and losses from mark-to-market valuations of these contracts are not
recognized in current income but are reported as non-trading deriva-
tive assets or liabilities and offset by a corresponding deferred account
balance included under “Regulatory liabilities” or “Regulatory assets.”
At Dec. 31, 2002, NW Natural had derivatives outstanding cover-
ing its exposures to commodity and foreign currency prices (see Note
11). The fair value of the hedge derivatives outstanding on that date

20

N W N A T U R A L

was a net gain of $12.4 million, compared to a net loss of $111.9 mil-
lion at Dec. 31, 2001. NW Natural had two natural gas price swap con-
tracts extending beyond Dec. 31, 2003, but none extends beyond Oct.
31, 2004. None of the natural gas call option contracts extends beyond
March 31, 2003.

In 2002, NW Natural recorded net losses from commodity swap
and call option contracts of $75.5 million, compared to net gains of
$57.6 million and $56.2 million during 2001 and 2000, respectively.
Gains (losses) from commodity hedges are recorded as reductions
(increases) to the cost of gas and are included in the calculation of annu-
al Purchased Gas Adjustment (PGA) rate changes. The gain or loss
on all foreign currency forward purchase contracts relating to gas
purchase obligations is included in NW Natural’s cost of gas.

The fair value of derivative instruments at Dec. 31, 2002 and 2001
was determined using estimated or quoted market prices for the peri-
ods covered by the contracts. Market prices for the natural gas swap
and call option contracts were obtained from external sources. These
third-party valuations are reviewed for reasonableness by the Company
using fair value calculations for other contracts with similar terms and
conditions. The market prices for the foreign currency forward contracts
are based on currency exchange rates quoted by The Bank of Canada.
Accounting for Pensions

NW Natural has two qualified non-contributory defined benefit
pension plans that cover all regular employees with more than one year
of service. These plans are funded through a trust dedicated to pro-
viding the benefits. Net periodic pension costs are determined in
accordance with SFAS No. 87, “Employers’Accounting for Pensions”
(see “Financial Condition – Pension Cost (Income) and Funding Status,”
below). NW Natural’s pension cost consists of service costs, interest
costs, the amortization of actuarial gains and losses, and expected
long-term returns on plan assets, and is based in part on a market-relat-
ed valuation of assets. Variances between actual investment gains or
losses and expected returns on plan assets are recognized over a three-
year period from the year in which they occur, thereby reducing year-
to-year volatility.

NW Natural’s accumulated benefit obligation, the fair value of
plan assets and the amount of annual pension cost are calculated based
on a number of actuarial assumptions including an expected long-
term return on plan assets, assumed rates of compensation increase
and a discount rate (see Note 7). In developing these assumptions, NW
Natural evaluates input from its actuaries as well as information avail-
able from the securities markets. The actuarial assumptions are eval-
uated annually and adjusted as necessary.

Based on information from its actuaries and investment advisors,
NW Natural reduced its expected long-term return on plan assets
from 9 percent to 8 percent, and reduced the discount rate used in
calculating benefit obligations from 7.25 percent to 6.75 percent, both
effective as of Jan. 1, 2003. Had these assumptions been in effect a
year earlier, NW Natural would have recorded net periodic pension
cost of $2.2 million for the year, rather than pension income of $0.1
million, and the Company’s net income would have been lower by
$0.8 million.
Contingencies

The Company records loss contingencies when it is probable that
a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss is reasonably
estimable. Estimating probable losses requires analysis of uncer-
tainties that often depend upon judgments about potential actions by
third parties. In the normal course of business, NW Natural records
accruals for loss contingencies including allowances for uncollectible

■
■
accounts receivable, environmental claims and property damage and
personal injury claims. NW Natural records receivables for anticipated
recoveries under insurance contracts when recovery is probable.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Regulatory Matters

NW Natural provides gas utility service in Oregon and Washington,
with Oregon representing over 90 percent of its revenues. Future earn-
ings and cash flows from utility operations will be determined large-
ly by the pace of continued growth in the residential and commercial
markets and by the ability to remain price competitive in the large in-
dustrial market, to control expenses, and to obtain reasonable and
timely regulatory ratemaking treatment for investments made in util-
ity plant.

NW Natural’s most recent general rate increase in Oregon, which
was effective Dec. 1, 1999, authorized rates designed to produce a re-
turn on common shareholders’ equity (ROE) of 10.25 percent. The
OPUC approved a revenue increase of $0.2 million per year, or 0.1
percent of Oregon revenues.

On Nov. 29, 2002, NW Natural filed a new general rate case in
Oregon. The filing proposes a revenue increase of $38 million per year
from Oregon operations through rate increases averaging 6.8 percent.
If the increase were approved as proposed, residential customer rates
would increase by 8.9 percent and commercial rates by 4.6 percent;
there would be no changes for industrial firm or interruptible cus-
tomer rates. The proposed rates are designed to produce an ROE of
11.3 percent and to recover increases in NW Natural’s cost of serv-
ice including the costs of complying with new federal regulations
regarding pipeline safety and integrity; expanding the Company’s
underground storage facilities to meet customer growth; commenc-
ing service to Coos County, Oregon; improving customer service;
and providing for system security, insurance coverage and employee
benefits. The schedule for the case provides for settlement confer-
ences in March 2003, the filing of OPUC staff and intervenor testi-
mony in late April, hearings in August and a decision by the OPUC
determining new rates by Oct. 1. The Company is unable to determine
the extent to which its proposals will be accepted by the OPUC.

In October 2000, the Washington Utilities and Transportation Com-
mission (WUTC) authorized a general rate increase totaling $4.3 mil-
lion per year, or 12.1 percent. The first $3.0 million per year of the
revenue increase, relating to costs allocated to Washington under a cost
allocation study approved by the WUTC and the OPUC, was effec-
tive on Nov. 1, 2000. The remaining increase of $1.3 million per year
was effective on Oct. 1, 2001. The WUTC authorized and based rates
on an ROE of 10.8 percent.

NW Natural applies rate changes each year under the PGA mech-
anisms in its tariffs in Oregon and Washington. The rate increases or
decreases reflect changes in the costs of natural gas commodity pur-
chased under contracts with gas producers (see “Comparison of Gas
Operations – Cost of Gas,” below), the application of temporary rate
adjustments to amortize balances in regulatory asset or liability
accounts and the removal of temporary rate adjustments effective the
previous year. In 2002, the OPUC approved rate decreases averaging
14 percent for NW Natural’s Oregon sales customers and the WUTC
approved rate decreases averaging 25 percent for NW Natural’s
Washington sales customers, both effective on Oct. 1, 2002. In 2001,
the OPUC approved rate increases averaging 22 percent for Oregon
sales customers and the WUTC approved rate increases averaging 21
percent for Washington sales customers, both effective on Oct. 1,
2001. In 2000, the OPUC approved rate increases averaging 23 per-

cent for Oregon sales customers effective on Oct. 1, 2000 and the
WUTC approved rate increases averaging 23 percent for Washington
sales customers effective on Aug. 1, 2000.

In an order issued in 1999, the OPUC formalized a process that tests
for excessive earnings in connection with gas utilities’ annual filings
under their PGA mechanisms. The OPUC confirmed NW Natural’s
ability to pass through 100 percent of its prudently incurred gas costs
into rates. Under this order, NW Natural is authorized to retain all of
its earnings up to a threshold level equal to its authorized ROE plus
300 basis points. One-third of any earnings above that level will be
refunded to customers. The excess earnings threshold is subject to
adjustment up or down each year depending on movements in inter-
est rates. There were no amounts identified in this process for refund
to customers with respect to NW Natural’s earnings results in 2000
or 2001. NW Natural does not expect there will be amounts identi-
fied for refund with respect to its earnings in 2002, which will be
reviewed by the OPUC in the second quarter of 2003.

In 2002, the OPUC approved a settlement in a proceeding NW
Natural initiated in 2001 with a goal of stabilizing margin revenues
in the face of above- or below-normal consumption patterns. NW
Natural believes that reductions in recent years in its customers’ gas
consumptions per degree day (see “Comparison of Gas Operations –
Residential and Commercial,” below) were caused by increases in the
cost of purchased gas that were passed on to customers as rate increas-
es, and to efforts throughout the region to conserve energy. NW Natural
estimates that lower average consumptions per degree day reduced mar-
gin from residential and commercial sales by $11 million, equivalent
to 26 cents a share, in 2001, and by $10.7 million, equivalent to 25
cents a share, in the first nine months of 2002. Pursuant to the settle-
ment, the OPUC authorized a mechanism for rate changes relating to
the impact of price elasticity, starting with small increases to resi-
dential and commercial rates that became effective on Oct. 1, 2002.
These rate changes contributed an estimated $3.5 million of margin
during the fourth quarter of 2002, equivalent to 8 cents a share.

Also under the settlement, the OPUC authorized NW Natural to
implement a partial decoupling mechanism effective Oct. 1, 2002.
Decoupling mechanisms are used to break the link between a utility’s
earnings and the energy consumed by its customers so the utility does
not have an incentive to discourage customers’ conservation efforts.
The decoupling mechanism works by adding margin revenues during
periods when customer consumptions are lower than baseline con-
sumption or by deducting margin revenues when consumptions are
higher than the baseline. Under the partial decoupling mechanism, NW
Natural uses a balancing account to defer and subsequently amortize
90 percent of the margin differentials between baseline usage by its
residential and commercial customers and weather-normalized actu-
al usage by these customers. The deferred amounts are treated as
adjustments to be refunded or collected in future periods. Baseline con-
sumption is based on current customer consumption patterns, adjust-
ed for consumptions resulting from new customers. NW Natural con-
tinues to bear the risk of weather-related variations in customer usage.
The partial decoupling mechanism will expire at the end of September
2005 unless the OPUC approves an extension based on the results of
an independent study to measure the mechanism’s effectiveness.

Also under the settlement, NW Natural agreed to adopt certain
service quality measures that establish the Company’s performance
goal for minimizing complaints by customers where the Company is
determined to be at fault. If NW Natural exceeds the prescribed lev-
el of at-fault complaints, it will be subject to penalties.

N W N A T U R A L

21

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION 
AND ANALYSIS

Comparison of Gas Operations

The following table summarizes the composition of gas utility vol-

umes and revenues for the three years ended Dec. 31:
(Thousands, 
except customers and degree days)

2001

2002

2000

Utility Gas Sales and Transportation Volumes – Therms:
Residential and commercial 
sales
Unbilled volumes

597,246
(6,617)
________

592,358
1,771
________

606,755
8,691
________

Industrial firm sales
Industrial interruptible sales

Weather-sensitive volumes 590,629 52% 594,129 53% 615,446 52%
6%
63,215
5%
26,241
________ _____ ________ _____ ________ _____
680,085 60% 737,504 66% 748,637 63%
445,999 40% 385,783 34% 431,136 37%
________ _____ ________ _____ ________ _____

6% 79,778
2% 63,597

7% 76,559
6% 56,632

Total gas sales

Transportation deliveries
Total volumes sold and 

delivered

1,126,084 100% 1,123,287 100% 1,179,773 100%
________ _____ ________ _____ ________ _____
________ _____ ________ _____ ________ _____

Utility Operating Revenues – Dollars:
Residential and commercial 
sales
Unbilled revenues

$ 556,210
(12,702)
________

$ 520,141
13,774
________

$ 440,302
12,661
________

Weather-sensitive 
revenues

Industrial firm sales
Industrial interruptible sales

Total gas sales

Transportation revenues
Other revenues
Total utility operating 

revenues
Cost of gas sold
Net operating revenues 
(utility margin)
Total number of customers 
(end of period)
Actual degree days
20-year average degree days

7% 49,662
2% 34,283

543,508 86% 533,915 84% 452,963 85%
7%
42,965
15,937
5%
________ _____ ________ _____ ________ _____
602,410 95% 617,860 97% 513,824 97%
4%
26,020
(1%)
4,018
________ _____ ________ _____ ________ _____

4% 20,637
1% (2,325)

3% 21,491
(3,976)

8% 37,378
5% 23,483

–

$ 632,448 100% $ 636,172 100% $ 531,339 100%
________ _____ ________ _____ ________ _____
________ _____ ________ _____ ________ _____
$ 353,034
________
________

$ 273,978
________
________

$ 364,699
________
________

$ 279,414
________
________

$ 271,473
________
________

$ 257,361
________
________

560,067
________
________
4,232
________
________
4,216
________
________

540,931
________
________
4,325
________
________
4,202
________
________

523,406
________
________
4,418
________
________
4,197
________
________

NW Natural refunded deferred gas cost savings to its Oregon cus-
tomers through billing credits in June 2002. The refunds were the
customers’ 67 percent portion of gas cost savings realized between
October 2001 and March 2002, which had been deferred, with inter-
est, pursuant to NW Natural’s PGA tariff in Oregon (see “Cost of Gas,”
below). The refunds reduced total gas sales and total utility operating
revenues for 2002 by $30.2 million and cost of gas sold by $29.5 mil-
lion. The refunds also reduced utility margin by about $0.9 million,
but this amount was largely offset by corresponding reductions in
franchise tax expense and uncollectible expense with the result that
the effect of the refunds on net income was negligible.
Residential and Commercial

NW Natural continued to grow its customer base, with 19,136
customers added during 2002. This represents a growth rate of 3.5
percent, compared to 3.3 percent in 2001 and 4.4 percent in 2000. In
the three years ended Dec. 31, 2002, more than 58,000 customers were
added to the system, representing an average annual growth rate of
3.9 percent.

Typically, 80 percent or more of NW Natural’s annual operating
revenues are derived from gas sales to weather-sensitive residential and
commercial customers. Accordingly, variations in temperatures
between periods affect volumes of gas sold to these customers.

Weather conditions in 2002 were very close to average for the
year. Temperatures were 3 percent colder than average in 2001 and 5
percent colder than average in 2000. Weather in 2002 was 2 percent
warmer than 2001 and 2001 was 2 percent warmer than 2000. Average
weather conditions are calculated from the most recent 20 years of tem-
perature data measured by heating degree-days.

22

N W N A T U R A L

The volumes of gas sold to residential and commercial customers
were 1 percent lower in 2002 than in 2001 and 3 percent lower in
2001 than in 2000, reflecting warmer weather as well as lower con-
sumption patterns by customers due to higher gas commodity prices
included in rates in previous years. Effective Oct. 1, 2002, the Com-
pany implemented rate increases designed to recover the margin lost
due to the changes in consumption patterns. Excluding the impact of
the  refunds  to  Oregon
customers during 2002,
in-
related  revenues 
creased $40 million, or
7 percent, primarily due
to  PGA  tariff  rate  in-
creases effective Oct. 1,
2001 (see “Regulatory
Matters,” above). Rev-
enue  from  residential
and  commercial  cus-
tomers was 18 percent
higher in 2001 than in
2000 due to rate increas-
es effective in 2000 and
2001.

WEATHER-SENSITIVE
OPERATING REVENUES
AND DEGREE DAYS

IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS

4,418
degree
days

4,232
degree
days

4,325
degree
days

$575

$550

$525

$500

$475

$450

$425

$400

$534

$453

$544

01

00

02
WEATHER-SENSITIVE REVENUES
DEGREE DAYS

Weather-sensitive operating revenues 
have been at record levels during 
the past three years. Weather condi-
tions in 2002 were comparable to 
the 20-year average.

In  order  to  match
revenues  with  related
purchased gas costs, NW
Natural records unbilled
revenues for gas deliv-
ered  and  sold  to  cus-
tomers, but not yet billed,
through the end of the
period. Amounts report-
ed as unbilled revenues reflect the increase or decrease in the balance
of unbilled revenues over the prior year-end. Weather conditions, rate
changes and customer billing dates from one period to the next affect
year-end balances.
Industrial Sales, Transportation and Other Revenues

The following table summarizes the delivered volumes and mar-

gin by market segment in the industrial market:
2002
(Thousands)

2001

2000

Delivered volumes by market segment (therms):
Electric generation
Industrial sales and transportation

Total volumes

Margin by market segment (dollars):
Electric generation
Industrial sales and transportation

Total margin

3,400
531,195
534,595

3,798
42,867
560,675
486,116
________ ________ ________
564,473
528,983
________ ________ ________
________ ________ ________

$     4,584 $     4,721 $          71
46,683
________ ________ ________
$   45,250 $   47,972 $   46,754
________ ________ ________
________ ________ ________

43,251

40,666

Total volumes delivered to industrial and electric generation cus-
tomers were 1 percent higher in 2002 than in 2001 and 6 percent low-
er in 2001 than in 2000. Combined margins from these customers
were 6 percent lower in 2002 than in 2001 and 3 percent higher in 2001
than in 2000.

Excluding electric generation customers, volumes delivered to
end-use industrial sales and transportation customers were 9 percent
higher in 2002 than in 2001 and 13 percent lower in 2001 than in
2000. Margin from these customers was 6 percent lower in 2002 than
in 2001 and 7 percent lower in 2001 than in 2000. The decline in mar-
gin from these customers was due to migrations of some industrial cus-
tomers from higher margin firm service to lower margin interruptible

service and to plant shut-downs or cut-backs in the manufacturing
sector because of economic conditions.

In the electric generation market segment, margin was $4.6 mil-
lion and $4.7 million in 2002 and 2001, respectively, equivalent to 11
cents a share in each year. More than 90 percent of the margin but only
about 14 percent of the gas deliveries in each of these years was from
two customers that were served under contracts that went into effect
in the second half of 2001 and expired at the end of the second quar-
ter of 2002. Most of the margin from these contracts was from fixed
charges. A third electric generation customer used 3.0 million therms
in 2002, 36.8 million therms in 2001 and 3.8 million therms in 2000
under contracts with low volumetric charges. Margin in the electric
generation market segment in 2000 was negligible.

Other revenues include amortizations of regulatory accounts and
miscellaneous fee income. In 2002, other revenues increased net util-
ity operating revenues by $4.0 million. Other revenues in 2002 includ-
ed customer late payment and collection fees ($3.1 million), amor-
tizations of regulatory accounts covering customer consumption
under NW Natural’s decoupling mechanism ($1.7 million) (see “Reg-
ulatory Matters,” above), miscellaneous revenues ($1.6 million) and
refunds due to sharing of income from interstate gas storage servic-
es ($1.2 million), partially offset by amortizations from regulatory
accounts covering conservation programs ($2.1 million) and Year
2000 costs ($1.5 million).

In 2001, other revenues reduced net utility operating revenues by
$2.3 million. Other revenues in 2001 included expense amortizations
of regulatory accounts covering conservation programs ($4.9 mil-
lion), Year 2000 costs ($1.2 million) and property taxes ($0.2 million),
partially offset by revenues from customer late payment and collec-
tion fees ($2.9 million) and miscellaneous revenues ($1.3 million).
Cost of Gas

The cost per therm of gas sold was 5 percent higher in 2002 than
in 2001 and 35 percent higher in 2001 than in 2000. The cost per therm
of gas sold includes current gas purchases, gas drawn from storage
inventory, gains or losses from commodity hedges, margin from off-
system gas sales, demand cost equalization, regulatory deferrals and
company use.

Results for 2002 include an adjustment reducing cost of gas by
$29.5 million (see “Comparison of Gas Operations,” above). Excluding
the impact of this adjustment, the cost per therm of gas sold was 14
percent higher in 2002 than in 2001, primarily due to higher prices in
the natural gas commodity market. Results for 2002 also include
adjustments reducing cost of gas by $2.9 million to correct the amount
of deferred expenses related to the recovery of pipeline demand
charges under NW Natural’s Oregon PGA mechanism. These adjust-
ments contributed 7 cents a share to earnings during 2002. The cor-
rected methodology will continue to be applied in the future.

NW Natural uses a natural gas commodity-price hedge program
under the terms of its Derivatives Policy (see Note 1) to help manage
its variable price gas commodity contracts. NW Natural recorded net
losses from commodity swap and call option contracts of $75.5 mil-
lion during 2002, compared to net gains of $57.6 million and $56.2
million in 2001 and 2000, respectively. Gains (losses) from com-
modity hedges are recorded as reductions (increases) to the cost of gas
and the majority of such gains and losses are included in annual PGA
rate adjustments.

Under NW Natural’s PGA tariff in Oregon, net income from Oregon
operations is affected within defined limits by changes in purchased
gas costs. NW Natural absorbs 33 percent of the higher cost of gas

sold, or retains 33 percent of the lower cost, in either case as compared
to projected costs built into rates. The remaining 67 percent of the high-
er or lower gas costs is recorded as deferred debits or credits (regu-
latory assets or liabilities) for recovery from or refund to customers
in future rates. Net savings realized from gas commodity purchases
in 2002 contributed $10.8 million of margin, equivalent to 26 cents
a share of earnings. Net savings realized from gas purchases in 2001
totaled $12.3 million, of which $8.2 million was deferred for refund
to customers and $4.1 million was reflected as an increase in margin.
These gas cost savings contributed 10 cents a share to earnings in
2001, while excess gas costs in 2000 reduced earnings by 7 cents a
share.

Under an agreement with the OPUC, margin from off-system gas
sales is treated as a reduction of gas costs. These sales reduced the cost
of gas sold by $2.8 million in 2002, $2.6 million in 2001 and $3.0 mil-
lion in 2000.

Natural gas commodity prices have fluctuated dramatically in
recent years. NW Natural has sought to mitigate the effect of price
volatility on core utility customers through the use of its underground
storage facilities, by entering into gas commodity-based financial
hedge contracts, and by crediting gas costs with margin revenues
derived from off-system sales of commodity and released trans-
portation capacity in periods when core utility customers do not ful-
ly utilize firm pipeline capacity and gas supplies.
Non-utility Operations

At Dec. 31, 2002 and 2001, the Company’s non-utility operations
consisted of two direct wholly-owned subsidiaries, Financial Corpor-
ation and Northwest Energy, and gas storage operations. One dis-
continued segment, Canor, a majority-owned subsidiary, was sold in
2000 (see “Discontinued Segment,” below).
Financial Corporation

Financial Corporation’s operating results in 2002 were net income
of $1.2 million, compared to $0.7 million in 2001 and $0.1 million
in 2000. The increases in net income from 2001 to 2002, and from 2000
to 2001, were due to improved operating results from Financial Cor-
poration’s investments in limited partnerships in wind and solar elec-
tric generation projects in California. The Company’s investment in
Financial Corporation at Dec. 31, 2002, was $9.1 million, compared
to $7.9 million and $7.2 million at Dec. 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
Northwest Energy

Northwest Energy was formed in 2001 to serve as the holding com-
pany for NW Natural and PGE if the acquisition of PGE had been com-
pleted. Northwest Energy recorded a loss provision totaling $13.9
million (before tax) in 2002 for the transaction costs incurred in con-
nection with the effort to acquire PGE. These charges, equivalent to
33 cents a diluted share, were based upon the Company’s judgment
that the acquisition was no longer probable.
Discontinued Segment

During 2000, the Company sold its interest in Canor at a gain of

$2.4 million, equivalent to 9 cents a share (see Note 2).
Gas Storage

NW Natural realized net income from its non-utility gas storage
business segment in 2002, after regulatory sharing and income tax-
es, of $3.6 million or 14 cents a share, up from $2.1 million or 8 cents
a share in 2001 and $0.1 million or negligible earnings per share in
2000. Gas storage services are provided to upstream interstate cus-
tomers using storage capacity that has been developed in advance of
core utility customers’ requirements. NW Natural retains 80 percent
of the income before tax from gas storage services and credits the re-

N W N A T U R A L

23

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION 
AND ANALYSIS

maining 20 percent to a deferred regulatory account for sharing with
its core utility customers.

Results for the gas storage business segment also include rev-
enues, net of amounts shared with core utility customers, from a con-
tract with an independent energy trading company that seeks to opti-
mize the use of NW Natural’s assets by trading temporarily unused
portions of its gas storage capacity and upstream pipeline trans-
portation capacity.
Operating Expenses
Operations and Maintenance

Consolidated operations and maintenance expenses were $1.2 mil-
lion, or 1 percent, higher in 2002 than in 2001. The increase was
caused primarily by higher payroll costs due to wage and salary in-
creases ($1.3 million) and higher expenses for pension ($2.5 mil-
lion) (see “Financial Condition – Pension Cost (Income) and Funding
Status,” below) and health benefits ($1.2 million), partially offset by
an amount charged to a litigation reserve in 2001 ($1.7 million), low-
er information technology expenses ($1.0 million) and lower uncol-
lectible accounts expense ($0.5 million).

Consolidated operations and maintenance expenses were $6.1 mil-
lion, or 8 percent, higher in 2001 than in 2000. The increase resulted
primarily from higher payroll costs due to wage and salary increases
($1.9 million), higher costs for employees’ health and pension bene-
fits ($1.9 million), a charge to a litigation reserve resulting from an
unfavorable decision by the Oregon Supreme Court in a case involv-
ing a claim by a commercial customer ($1.7 million) and higher uncol-
lectible accounts expense ($1.0 million).
Taxes Other Than Income Taxes

Taxes other than income taxes, which are principally comprised of
property, franchise and payroll taxes, increased $1.8 million, or 6 per-
cent, in 2002. Property taxes increased $1.6 million, or 13 percent, due
to higher property tax rates and utility plant additions. Franchise tax-
es, regulatory fees and payroll tax expenses accounted for the remain-
ing $0.2 million increase in 2002.

Taxes other than income taxes increased $3.9 million, or 14 per-
cent, in 2001. Property taxes increased $1.8 million, or 18 percent, due
to higher property tax rates and utility plant additions. Franchise taxes,
which are based on gross revenues, increased $1.5 million, or 12 per-
cent, reflecting higher revenues due to NW Natural’s growing customer
base and rate increases effective in late 2000 and 2001. Regulatory fees
and payroll tax expenses accounted for the remaining $0.6 million
increase in 2001.
Depreciation and Amortization

The Company’s depreciation and amortization expense increased
by $2.5 million in 2002 and by $2.2 million in 2001, or about 5 per-
cent in each of these years, primarily due to corresponding increases
in utility plant and non-utility plant in service.

Depreciation and amortization expense was $3.6 million or about
7 percent lower in 2000 than in 1999, primarily due to charges to
depreciation expense in 1999 to write down NW Natural’s customer
information system pursuant to the OPUC’s order in its Oregon gen-
eral rate case concluded in 1999.

As a percentage of average plant and property, depreciation and
amortization expense was 3.5 percent in each of 2002, 2001 and 2000.
Other Income (Expense)

The Company’s other income (expense) decreased $16.2 million
in 2002, primarily due to a $13.9 million charge to a loss provision
for costs incurred in the effort to acquire PGE. Excluding the provi-

sion for PGE acquisition costs, other income (expense) decreased $2.3
million, primarily due to higher interest accrued on deferred regula-
tory account balances ($2.6 million), an increase in miscellaneous
non-operating expenses ($0.6 million) and a decrease in miscellaneous
non-operating income ($0.3 million), partially offset by an increase
in earnings from investments ($1.3 million).

Other income in 2001 was $1.3 million, or $2.5 million lower than
in 2000, primarily due to lower interest income accrued on deferred
regulatory account balances ($1.9 million) and lower miscellaneous
non-operating income ($0.6 million).
Interest Charges – Net

The Company’s net interest expense in 2002 was $0.3 million, or
1 percent, higher than in 2001, primarily due to higher average bal-
ances of long-term debt outstanding.

Net interest expense in 2001 was $0.2 million higher than in 2000.
Excluding a $1.0 million charge to interest expense due to an unfa-
vorable litigation decision, interest expense decreased $0.8 million in
2001 due to lower average interest rates.

Allowance for Funds Used During Construction (AFUDC) repre-
sents the cost of funds used during the construction of utility plant (see
Note 1). In 2002, AFUDC reduced interest expense by $0.6 million
compared to $1.0 million in 2001 and $0.8 million in 2000. AFUDC
was calculated using weighted average rates of 2.8 percent in 2002,
6.2 percent in 2001 and 6.0 percent in 2000 (see “Financial Condition –
Cash Flows – Financing Activities,” below).
Income Taxes

The effective income tax rate of 34.9 percent in 2002 includes the
effect of the tax benefit from the $13.9 million charge for costs incurred
in the effort to acquire PGE. Absent this charge, the effective tax rate
for 2002 would have been 35.6 percent, compared to 35.4 percent for
2001 and 35.9 percent for 2000 (see Note 8).
Redeemable Preferred and Preference Stock Dividend Requirements

Redeemable preferred and preference stock dividend requirements
for 2002, 2001 and 2000 were lower by $0.1 million in each year com-
pared to the prior year due to annual sinking fund redemptions. On
Dec. 31, 2002, NW Natural redeemed in its entirety the $6.95 Series
of Redeemable Preference Stock pursuant to the mandatory redemp-
tion provisions applicable to that Series.

FINANCIAL CONDITION
Capital Structure

The Company’s goal is to maintain a capital structure comprised
of 45 to 50 percent common stock equity, up to 10 percent preferred
stock and 45 to 50 percent short-term and long-term debt. When addi-
tional capital is required, debt or equity securities are issued depending
upon both the target capital structure and market conditions. These
sources also are used to meet long-term debt and preferred stock
redemption requirements (see Notes 3 and 5).
Liquidity and Capital Resources

At Dec. 31, 2002, the Company had $7.3 million in cash and cash
equivalents compared to $10.4 million at Dec. 31, 2001. Short-term
liquidity is provided by cash from operations and from the sale of the
Company’s commercial paper notes, which are supported by com-
mercial bank lines of credit (see Note 6). The Company has available
through Sept. 30, 2004, committed lines of credit with four commer-
cial banks (see “Lines of Credit,” below). On Dec. 31, 2002, NW
Natural redeemed all 250,000 shares of its $6.95 Series of Redeemable
Preference Stock with proceeds from the sale of commercial paper.

24

N W N A T U R A L

The following table shows NW Natural’s contractual commitments by maturity and type of commitment:
Long-term Gas
Supply
Commitments
$     78,810
47,600
43,583
39,147
37,472
_________
246,612
160,140
(96,817)
_________
$   309,935
_________
_________

(Thousands)
Payments Due in Years
Ending Dec. 31,
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Total 2003 – 2007
Thereafter
Less: imputed interest
Total

Capital
Leases
$          180
20
1
1
–
_________
202
–
(8)
_________
$          194
_________
_________

Long-term
Debt
$     20,000
–
15,000
8,000
29,500
_________
72,500
393,445
–
_________
$   465,945
_________
_________

Operating
Leases
$       2,943
2,675
2,597
1,003
301
_________
9,519
4,266
–
_________
$     13,785
_________
_________

Commercial
Paper
$     69,802
–
–
–
–
_________
69,802
–
–
_________
$     69,802
_________
_________

Preferred
Stock
$          750
750
750
750
750
_________
3,750
4,500
–
_________
$       8,250
_________
_________

Other
Purchase
Commitments
$     10,082
–
–
–
–
_________
10,082
–
–
_________
$     10,082
_________
_________

Total
$   182,567
51,045
61,931
48,901
68,023
_________
412,467
562,351
(96,825)
_________
$   877,993
_________
_________

NW Natural’s capital expenditures are primarily related to utility
construction resulting from customer growth and system improve-
ments (see “Cash Flows – Investing Activities,” below). In addition,
NW Natural has certain long-term contractual commitments under cap-
ital leases, operating leases and long-term gas supply purchase con-
tracts that require an adequate source of funding. NW Natural also has
a contract commitment to purchase about $10.1 million in gas trans-
mission pipe in 2003 for
use  in  constructing  an
extension of the pipeline
from  its  Mist  storage
field. These capital and
contractual expenditures
are financed through cash
from operations and from
the issuance of short-term
debt, which is periodical-
ly refinanced through the
sale of long-term debt or
equity securities.

CAPITAL STRUCTURE

IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS

$1,200

$1,000

$600

$400

$800

47%

52%

51%

47%

46%

49%

1%

3%

4%

01

02

00

COMMON EQUITY
PREFERRED AND PREFERENCE STOCK
SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM DEBT

The Company’s long-term goal is to 
maintain a capital structure of 45 to 
50 percent common stock equity. 

There  are  no  credit
rating triggers or stock
price  provisions 
that
require the acceleration
of debt repayment under
NW Natural’s Mortgage
and Deed of Trust or oth-
er  long-term  indebted-
ness. Also, there are no
rating triggers or stock
price provisions contained in contracts or other agreements with third
parties, except for agreements with certain counter-parties under NW
Natural’s Derivatives Policy, which require the affected party to provide
substitute collateral such as cash, guaranty or letter of credit if cred-
it ratings are lowered to non-investment grade, or in some cases if the
mark-to-market value exceeds a certain threshold. At Dec. 31, 2002,
the Company had three commodity-price swap agreements outstanding
with one counter-party which was subject to a below investment grade
ratings trigger. The Company has no other material off-balance sheet
obligations, except for certain lease and purchase commitments (see
table above and Note 12).
Commercial Paper

$200

The Company’s primary source of short-term funds is commercial
paper notes payable. Both NW Natural and Financial Corporation
issue commercial paper under agency agreements with a commercial
bank. NW Natural’s commercial paper is supported by its committed
bank lines of credit (see “Lines of Credit,” below), while Financial Cor-

poration’s commercial paper is supported by committed bank lines of
credit and the guaranty of NW Natural (see Note 6). NW Natural had
$69.8 million of commercial paper notes outstanding at Dec. 31, 2002,
compared to $108.3 million at Dec. 31, 2001. Financial Corporation
had no commercial paper notes outstanding at Dec. 31, 2002 or 2001.
Lines of Credit

NW Natural has lines of credit with four commercial banks total-
ing $150 million. Half of the credit with each bank, totaling $75 mil-
lion, is committed and available through Sept. 30, 2003, and the oth-
er $75 million is committed and available through Sept. 30, 2004. In
addition, Financial Corporation has available through Sept. 30, 2003,
committed lines of credit with two commercial banks totaling $20
million. Financial Corporation’s lines are supported by the guaranty
of NW Natural.

Under the terms of these lines of credit, NW Natural and Financial
Corporation pay commitment fees but are not required to maintain
compensating bank balances. The interest rates on borrowings under
these lines of credit, if any, are based on current market rates. There
were no outstanding balances under either NW Natural’s or Financial
Corporation’s lines of credit at Dec. 31, 2002 or 2001.

NW Natural’s lines of credit require that credit ratings be maintained
in effect at all times and that notice be given of any change in its sen-
ior unsecured debt ratings. A change in NW Natural’s credit rating is
not an event of default, nor is the maintenance of a specific mini-
mum level of credit rating a condition to drawing upon the lines of cred-
it. However, interest rates on any loans outstanding under NW Natural’s
bank lines are tied to credit ratings, which would increase or decrease
the cost of bank debt, if any, when ratings are changed.

The lines of credit require the Company to maintain an indebted-
ness to total capitalization ratio of 65 percent or less and to maintain
a net worth at least equal to 80 percent of its net worth at Sept. 30, 2002,
plus 50 percent of the Company’s net income for each subsequent
fiscal quarter. Failure to comply with either of these covenants would
entitle the banks to terminate their lending commitments and to accel-
erate the maturity of all amounts outstanding. At Dec. 31, 2002, the
Company was in compliance with both of these covenants. The banks
have waived through Sept. 30, 2003, a requirement that NW Natural
represent that the assets dedicated to its qualified pension plans exceed
the unfunded liabilities of the plans before it may draw upon the lines
of credit.

NW Natural may be unable to draw upon the two-year portions
of the credit lines, totaling $75 million, until its notes relating to the
two-year commitments are approved by the OPUC or the WUTC, or
both. NW Natural expects that it will be able to secure such approvals,
if required. 

N W N A T U R A L

25

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION 
AND ANALYSIS

Cash Flows
Operating Activities

Continuing operations provided net cash of $124 million in 2002
compared to $72 million in 2001. The 73 percent increase was due to
increased cash from operations before working capital changes ($5.7
million) and lower working capital requirements ($47 million). The
increase in cash from continuing operations before working capital
changes was due to an increase in deferred income taxes and invest-
ment tax credits in 2002 compared to a reduction in 2001 ($22.5 mil-
lion), the loss provision for the PGE transaction costs ($13.9 million)
and higher depreciation and amortization ($2.4 million), largely off-
set by a small increase in deferred gas cost payables in 2002 compared
to a large swing from net gas cost receivables to payables in 2001
($26.5 million), and lower net income in 2002 ($6.4 million). The
decrease in working capital requirements was due to an increase in
accounts payable in 2002 compared to a decrease in 2001 ($44 mil-
lion), a decrease in accrued unbilled revenue in 2002 compared to an
increase in 2001 ($26 million), and a decrease in accounts receivable
in 2002 compared to an increase in 2001 ($22 million), partially off-
set by a decrease in accrued interest and taxes in 2002 compared to
an increase in 2001 ($40 million) and a larger increase in inventories
in 2002 ($6.2 million).

NW Natural’s refunds to customers of approximately $30.2 mil-
lion of deferred gas cost savings in 2002 (see “Results of Operations –
Comparison of Gas Operations,” above) reduced cash flows from
operations by that amount, but the reduction was more than offset by
the other factors affecting cash flows cited above.

The Job Creation and Worker Assistance Act of 2002 (the Assist-
ance Act), enacted on March 9, 2002, allows an additional first-year
tax deduction for depreciation equal to 30 percent of the adjusted
basis of “qualified property.” The extra 30 percent depreciation deduc-
tion in the first year is an acceleration of depreciation deductions that
otherwise would have been taken in the later years of an asset’s recov-
ery period. In general, the extra 30 percent depreciation deduction is
available for most personal property acquired after Sept. 10, 2001, and
before Sept. 11, 2004. The Company anticipates enhanced cash flow
from reduced income taxes, totaling an estimated $25 million to $30
million, during the effective period of the Assistance Act, based on
actual and projected plant investments between Sept. 11, 2001 and
Sept. 10, 2004.

Continuing operations provided net cash of $72 million in 2001
compared to $87 million in 2000. The 18 percent decrease was due
to increased cash from operations before working capital changes ($8
million), offset by higher working capital requirements ($24 million).
The increase in cash from continuing operations before working cap-
ital changes was due to a larger decrease in deferred gas costs ($23
million), an increase in income from continuing operations ($2.4 mil-
lion) and an increase in depreciation and amortization in 2001 ($2.2
million), partially offset by a decrease in deferred investment tax cred-
its and income taxes ($17 million) and a smaller decrease in regula-
tory accounts and other ($3 million). The increase in working capital
requirements was due to a decrease in accounts payable ($82.5 mil-
lion), partially offset by smaller increases in other current assets and
liabilities ($19.5 million), accounts receivable ($13 million), inven-
tories ($10.5 million), accrued unbilled revenues ($2 million), and a
larger increase in accrued interest and taxes ($13 million).

The Company has lease and purchase commitments relating to its
operating activities that are financed with cash flows from operations
(see “Liquidity and Capital Resources,” above, and Note 12).

26

N W N A T U R A L

Investing Activities

Cash requirements for investing activities in 2002 totaled $84
million, down from $87 million in 2001, primarily due to lower amounts
of cash used for investments in non-utility property ($6.9 million) and
for the PGE transaction ($5.2 million), partially offset by higher
amounts of cash used for the construction of utility plant ($7.6 mil-
lion) and lower cash proceeds from the sale of assets ($2.8 million).
Cash requirements for utility construction in 2002 totaled $80 mil-
lion, up from $72 million in 2001, primarily as a result of capital
expenditures related to NW Natural’s pipeline safety program ($4.7
million) and special projects expanding service into new service
areas ($3.4 million).

Cash requirements for investing activities in 2001 totaled $87 mil-
lion, up from $31 million in 2000, primarily due to proceeds from the
sales in 2000 of Canor ($35 million) and a building constructed for
the Port of Portland ($20 million). Cash requirements for utility con-
struction in 2001 totaled $72 million, down $8.5 million from 2000.
The decrease in cash requirements for utility construction in 2001
resulted primarily from the completion of another phase in the expan-
sion of NW Natural’s Mist gas storage system in 2000 ($8.7 million).
Investments in non-utility property in 2002 ($2.6 million) and
2001 ($9.6 million) included expenditures for certain improvements
to the Company’s Mist gas storage system that were primarily relat-
ed to interstate storage services.

During the five-year period 2003 through 2007, utility construc-
tion expenditures are estimated at between $500 million and $600
million. The level of capital expenditures over the next five years
reflects projected customer growth, system improvement projects
resulting in part from requirements under the Pipeline Safety Act (see
below), and a project estimated to cost $93 million to extend the
pipeline that moves gas from NW Natural’s Mist gas storage field
into growing portions of its service area. An estimated 60 percent of
the required funds are expected to be internally generated over the five-
year period; the remainder will be funded through a combination of
long-term debt and equity securities with short-term debt providing
liquidity and bridge financing.

NW Natural’s utility construction expenditures in 2003 are esti-
mated to total $148 million, up from $85 million in 2002. Projected
utility construction in 2003 includes $31 million for customer growth,
up from $29 million in 2002; $36 million for system improvement and
support, up from $25 million in 2002; $55 million for the extension
of the Mist pipeline and related gas storage projects, up from $9 mil-
lion in 2002; and $6 million for the construction of a gas distribution
system in Coos County, Oregon, up from $1 million in 2002.

The project for the extension of the Mist pipeline has a scheduled
completion date in late 2004 or 2005. Following two years of review
of NW Natural’s application, including extensive public involvement,
the Oregon Energy Facility Siting Council granted a permit for the
project, with conditions, on March 13, 2003. The issuance of this per-
mit potentially could be appealed under current law. NW Natural also
must obtain easements and rights-of-way for the construction of the
pipeline and may need to use condemnation proceedings to secure
some of them.

The Company entered into a stipulation with the OPUC in 2001
for an enhanced pipeline safety program that includes an accelerated
bare steel replacement program and a geo-hazard safety program.
The bare steel replacement program accelerates the replacement of the
Company’s bare steel piping over 20 years instead of 40 years. The geo-
hazard safety program includes the identification, assessment and

remediation of risks to the Company’s piping infrastructure created
by landslides, washouts, earthquakes or similar occurrences. The stip-
ulation allowed the Company to receive deferred accounting rate treat-
ment commencing Oct. 1, 2002, for costs associated with the pro-
grams, expected to be approximately $1.5 million annually.

On Nov. 15, 2002, Congress passed the Pipeline Safety Improve-
ment Act of 2002 (Pipeline Safety Act) and the legislation was signed
into law by President Bush on Dec. 17, 2002. The Pipeline Safety Act
requires operators of gas transmission pipelines to identify lines
located in High Consequence Areas (HCAs) and develop Integrity
Management Programs (IMPs) to periodically inspect the integrity
of the pipelines and make repairs or replacements as necessary to
ensure the ongoing integrity of the pipelines. The legislation requires
NW Natural to complete inspection of the 50 percent highest risk
pipelines located in its HCAs within the first five years, and the
remaining covered pipelines within 10 years of the date of the enact-
ment. The Pipeline Safety Act also requires re-inspections of the cov-
ered pipelines every seven years thereafter for the life of the pipelines.
On Jan. 28, 2003, the U.S. Department of Transportation issued pro-
posed rules that may impose additional requirements on pipeline
operators that could result in shorter time periods for compliance
and require additional capital investment by the Company. The cost
of compliance with the legislation and rules is uncertain; however,
NW Natural’s IMP is expected to cost approximately $5 million to
$10 million per year beginning in 2004, and more than $100 million
over the next 10 years.
Financing Activities

Cash used in financing activities in 2002 totaled $43 million, com-
pared to cash provided by financing activities in 2001 of $15 million.
Factors contributing to the $58 million difference were a reduction in
short-term debt in 2002 ($38 million) compared to an increase in
2001 ($52 million), the redemption of the $6.95 Series of Preference
Stock in 2002 ($25 million), and a higher amount used for the retire-
ment of long-term debt ($40.5 million in 2002 compared to $20 mil-
lion in 2001), partially offset by an increase in long-term debt issued
($90 million in 2002 compared to $18 million in 2001) and a reduc-
tion in common stock repurchased ($5.8 million).

Cash provided by financing activities in 2001 totaled $15 million,
compared to cash used in financing activities in 2000 of $55 million.
Factors contributing to the $70 million difference were a lower amount
used for the retirement of long-term debt ($20 million in 2001 com-
pared to $60 million in 2000) and an increase in short-term debt in
2001 ($52 million) compared to a reduction in short-term debt in 2000
($38 million), partially offset by a reduction in long-term debt issued
($18 million in 2001 compared to $75 million in 2000).

NW Natural sold $90 million of its secured Medium-Term Notes,
Series B (MTNs), in 2002 and used the proceeds to reduce long-term
debt ($40.5 million), provide cash for investments in utility plant and
reduce short-term borrowings.

NW Natural sold $18 million of its secured MTNs in 2001 and used
the proceeds, together with a $52 million increase in short-term bor-
rowings, to reduce long-term debt ($20 million) and provide cash for
investments in utility plant.

In 2000, NW Natural commenced a program to repurchase up to
2 million shares, or up to $35 million in value, of NW Natural’s com-
mon stock through a repurchase program that has been extended
through May 2003. The purchases are made in the open market or
through privately negotiated transactions. The Company used $5.8
million for the repurchase of 246,700 shares under the program in

2001. No shares were repurchased in 2002. Since the program’s incep-
tion the Company has repurchased 355,400 shares of common stock
at a total cost of $8.2 million.
Pension Cost (Income) and Funding Status

Net periodic pension costs are determined in accordance with
SFAS No. 87, “Employers’Accounting for Pensions” (see “Application
of Critical Accounting Policies – Accounting for Pensions,” above).
The annual pension cost or income is allocated between operations and
maintenance expense and construction overhead.

Net periodic pension income was $0.1 million, $4.1 million and
$5.4 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. No cash contribu-
tions to NW Natural’s qualified defined benefit pension plans were
required for the 2002 plan year. The fair value of the plan assets declined
from $169 million at Dec. 31, 2001, to $143 million at Dec. 31, 2002,
including $15 million in investment losses, $10 million in withdrawals
to pay benefits and $1 million in eligible expenses of the plans. The
present value of benefit obligations under the plans increased from an
estimated $156 million to $172 million over that period.

Despite the reduced pension income in 2002 and 2001, and the
recent reductions in the funded status of the plans, NW Natural believes
it will be able to maintain well-funded pension plans. NW Natural
expects to be required to make cash contributions estimated at $1.9
million to the plans for the 2003 plan year, payable by September
2004, but it does not expect these or future cash contributions to have
a material adverse effect on its liquidity or financial condition.
Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges

For the years ended Dec. 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, the Company’s
ratios of earnings to fixed charges, computed using the Securities and
Exchange Commission method, were 2.85, 3.14 and 3.14, respec-
tively. For this purpose, earnings consist of net income before taxes
plus fixed charges, and fixed charges consist of interest on all indebt-
edness, the amortization of debt expense and discount or premium and
the estimated interest portion of rentals charged to income.

CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
Environmental Matters

NW Natural owns property in Multnomah County, Oregon that is
the site of a former gas manufacturing plant that was closed in 1956
(the Gasco site). The Gasco site has been under investigation by NW
Natural for environmental contamination under the Oregon Department
of Environmental Quality’s (ODEQ) Voluntary Clean-Up Program.
NW Natural has recorded liabilities totaling $4.0 million for the esti-
mated costs of investigation and interim remediation at the Gasco
site, including consultants’ fees, ODEQ oversight reimbursement and
legal fees, of which $3.2 million had been spent as of Dec. 31, 2002.
NW Natural previously owned property adjacent to the Gasco site
that now is the location of a manufacturing plant owned by Wacker
Siltronic Corporation (the Wacker site). In 2000, the ODEQ issued an
order requiring Wacker and NW Natural to determine the nature and
extent of releases of hazardous substances to Willamette River sedi-
ments from the Wacker site. NW Natural has completed the majori-
ty of the studies required under the ODEQ work plan and the agency
is reviewing data generated by the studies. NW Natural has recorded
a liability of $0.3 million for its estimated costs of the investigation
and initial remediation on the Wacker site, of which $0.2 million had
been spent as of Dec. 31, 2002.

In 1998, the ODEQ and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) completed a study of sediments in a 5.5-mile segment of the
Willamette River (the Portland Harbor) that includes the area adjacent

N W N A T U R A L

27

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION 
AND ANALYSIS

to the Gasco site and the Wacker site. In 2000, the EPA listed the Portland
Harbor as a Superfund site and notified the Company that it is a poten-
tially responsible party. NW Natural recorded liabilities totaling $2.3
million between 2000 and 2002, of which $1.1 million had been spent
as of Dec. 31, 2002. The amount of NW Natural’s liability is based
on estimates of the Company’s share of the lower end of a range of
probable liability for the costs of the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility
Study for the Portland Harbor. Available information is insufficient
to determine either the total amount of liability for investigation and
remediation of the Portland Harbor or the higher end of a range for
NW Natural’s estimated share of that liability.

The City of Portland has notified NW Natural that it is planning
a sewer improvement project that would include excavation within
the former site of a gas manufacturing plant (the Portland Gas site)
that was owned and operated by a predecessor of the Company between
1860 and 1913. The preliminary assessment of this site performed by
a consultant for the EPA in 1987 indicated that it could be assumed
that by-product tars may have been disposed of on site. The report con-
cluded, however, that it is likely that waste residues from the plant, if
present on the site, were covered by deep fill during construction of
the nearby seawall bordering the Willamette River and probably have
stabilized due to physical and chemical processes. Neither the City of
Portland nor the ODEQ has notified NW Natural whether a further
investigation or potential remediation might be required on the site in
connection with the sewer project. Available information is insufficient
to determine either the total amount of liability or a probable range,
if any, of potential liability.

NW Natural has accrued all material loss contingencies relating
to environmental matters that it believes to be probable of assertion
and reasonably estimable. Due to the preliminary nature of these envi-
ronmental investigations, the range of any additional possible loss
contingency cannot be currently estimated. NW Natural expects that
its costs of further investigation and remediation for which it may be
responsible with respect to the Gasco site, the Wacker site, the Portland
Harbor site and the Portland Gas site, if any, should be recoverable,
in large part, from insurance. At Dec. 31, 2002, NW Natural had a $2.5
million receivable representing an estimate of the environmental costs
NW Natural expects to recover from insurance, including $1.4 mil-
lion that was recorded in 2000 for costs relating to the Gasco site and
$1.1 million that was recorded in 2002 for costs relating to the Portland
Harbor site. In the event these costs are not recovered from insur-
ance, NW Natural will seek recovery through future rates.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES 
ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company’s primary market risk exposures associated with
activities involving derivative financial instruments and other finan-
cial instruments are natural gas commodity price risk, foreign currency
exchange risk and interest rate risk. Derivative financial instruments
are used as tools to mitigate certain of these market risks (see Note
11). Such instruments are used for hedging purposes, not for trading
purposes. Market risks associated with the derivative financial instru-
ments are monitored by management personnel who do not directly
enter into these contracts and by the Audit Committee of the Board
of Directors.
Physical and Financial Commodity, Foreign Currency and 
Interest Rate Transactions

NW Natural enters into short-term and long-term natural gas pur-
chase contracts with demand and commodity fixed-price and float-

28

N W N A T U R A L

ing-price components, along with associated short-term and long-
term natural gas transportation contracts. Foreign currency forward
contracts are used to hedge against foreign exchange rate fluctuations
on purchases made under these contracts that are denominated in
Canadian dollars.

Historically, NW Natural has taken physical delivery of at least the
minimum quantities specified in its natural gas purchase contracts. The
contracts are subject to annual re-pricing, a process that is intended
to reflect anticipated market price trends during the next year. NW
Natural’s PGA mechanism in Oregon provides for the recovery from
customers of actual commodity costs in comparison with established
benchmark costs, except that NW Natural absorbs 33 percent of the
higher cost of gas sold, or retains 33 percent of the lower cost, in either
case as compared to projections.

At Dec. 31, 2002, differences between notional values and fair
values with respect to NW Natural’s open positions in derivative finan-
cial instruments were not material to the Company’s financial posi-
tion or results of operations because of the treatment of these instru-
ments in regulatory mechanisms relating to gas costs (see “Results of
Operations – Comparison of Gas Operations – Cost of Gas,” above,
and Notes 1 and 11). However, to the degree that market risks exist
due to potential adverse changes in commodity prices and foreign
exchange rates in relation to these financial and physical contracts, the
Company considers the risks to be:
Commodity Price Risk

The prices of natural gas commodity are subject to fluctuations due
to unpredictable factors including weather, pipeline transportation
congestion and other factors that affect short-term supply and demand.
Natural gas commodity swaps and call option contracts are used to con-
vert certain long-term gas purchase contracts from floating prices to
fixed prices. At Dec. 31, 2002 and 2001, notional amounts under nat-
ural gas commodity swaps and call option contracts totaled $180.6 mil-
lion and $260.6 million, respectively. As of Dec. 31, 2002, two com-
modity agreements extended beyond Dec. 31, 2003. If all of the
commodity swaps and call option contracts had been settled on Dec. 31,
2002, a gain of $12.6 million would have been realized (see Note 11).
Foreign Currency Risk

The costs of natural gas commodity and certain pipeline services
purchased from Canadian suppliers are subject to changes in the val-
ue of Canadian currency in relation to U.S. currency. Foreign cur-
rency forward contracts are used to hedge against fluctuations in
exchange rates with respect to purchases of natural gas from Canadian
suppliers. At Dec. 31, 2002 and 2001, notional amounts under foreign
currency forward contracts totaled $15.5 million and $10.2 million,
respectively. As of Dec. 31, 2002, no foreign currency forward con-
tracts extended beyond Dec. 31, 2003. If all of the foreign currency
forward contracts had been settled on Dec. 31, 2002, a loss of $0.2
million would have been realized (see Note 11).
Interest Rate Risk

Interest rate risk relates to new debt financing needed to fund cap-
ital requirements, including maturing debt securities, and to the
issuance of commercial paper. Interest rate risk is managed through
the issuance of fixed-rate debt with varying maturities and the reduc-
tion of debt through optional redemption when interest rates are favor-
able. No derivative financial instruments to hedge interest rates were
in place at Dec. 31, 2002 or 2001.

MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY
FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The financial statements in this report were prepared by manage-
ment, which is responsible for their objectivity and integrity. The
statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accept-
ed accounting principles in the United States of America and, where
appropriate, reflect informed estimates based on judgments of man-
agement. The responsibility of the Company’s independent account-
ants is to render an independent report on the financial statements.

The Company’s system of internal accounting controls is designed
to provide reasonable assurance that assets are safeguarded and trans-
actions are executed in accordance with management’s authoriza-
tions, that transactions are recorded to permit the preparation of finan-
cial statements in conformity with orders of regulatory authorities
and generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of
America and that accountability for assets is maintained. The Com-
pany’s system of internal controls has provided such reasonable assur-
ances during the periods reported herein. The system includes writ-
ten policies, procedures and guidelines, an organization structure that
segregates duties and an established program for monitoring the sys-
tem by internal auditors. In addition, the Company has prepared and
annually distributes to its employees a Code of Ethics covering its
policies for conducting business affairs in a lawful and ethical man-
ner. In February 2003, the Board of Directors approved a Financial
Code of Ethics covering all senior financial executives and managers.

Ongoing review programs are carried out to ensure compliance with
these policies.

The Board of Directors, through its Audit Committee (the Com-
mittee), oversees management’s financial reporting responsibilities.
The Committee meets regularly with management, the internal audi-
tors, and representatives of the Company’s independent accountants.
Both internal auditors and independent accountants have free and
independent access to the Committee and the Board of Directors.
Each member of the Committee meets the requirements of “inde-
pendent director” as defined by New York Stock Exchange Listing
Standards. The Committee reports the results of its activities to the
full Board of Directors. Annually, the Committee selects the inde-
pendent accountants.

Mark S. Dodson
President and Chief Executive Officer

Bruce R. DeBolt
Senior Vice President, Finance, and Chief Financial Officer

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT
ACCOUNTANTS

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Northwest Natural Gas Company:

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of income, of earnings invested in
the business, of cash flows and of capitalization present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Northwest Natural Gas
Company (doing business as NW Natural) and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) at December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the results of their oper-
ations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002 in conformity with accounting principles gen-
erally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management; our respon-
sibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance
with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, which require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain rea-
sonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evi-
dence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates
made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for
our opinion.

As discussed in Notes 1 and 11 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for derivative

instruments as of January 1, 2001.

Portland, Oregon
February 14, 2003

N W N A T U R A L

29

Thousands, except per share amounts (year ended December 31)

2002

2001

2000

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF INCOME

Operating revenues:

Gross operating revenues
Cost of sales

Net operating revenues

Operating expenses:

Operations and maintenance
Taxes other than income taxes
Depreciation and amortization
Total operating expenses

Income from continuing operations

Other income (expense)
Interest charges – net
Income before income taxes
Income taxes

Net income from continuing operations
Discontinued segment:

Gain on sale of discontinued segment – net of tax

Net income

Redeemable preferred and preference stock dividend requirements

Earnings applicable to common stock

Average common shares outstanding
Basic earnings per share of common stock:

From continuing operations
From gain on sale of discontinued segment

Total basic earnings per share

Diluted earnings per share of common stock:

From continuing operations
From gain on sale of discontinued segment

Total diluted earnings per share
Dividends per share of common stock

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF 
EARNINGS INVESTED IN THE BUSINESS

$   641,376
353,832
_________
287,544

$   650,252
374,241
_________
276,011

$  532,110
274,160
_________
257,950

85,120
34,076
52,090
_________
171,286
_________
116,258

(14,890)
34,132
_________
67,236
23,444
_________

83,920
32,240
49,640
_________
165,800
_________
110,211

1,334
33,805
_________
77,740
27,553
_________

77,817
28,351
47,440
_________
153,608
_________
104,342

3,860
33,561
_________
74,641
26,829
_________

43,792

50,187

47,812

–
_________
43,792
2,280
_________
$     41,512
_________
_________

–
_________
50,187
2,401
_________
$     47,786
_________
_________

2,412
_________
50,224
2,456
_________
$     47,768
_________
_________

25,431

25,159

25,183

$         1.63
–
_________
$         1.63
_________
_________

$         1.62
–
_________
$         1.62
_________
_________
$         1.26
_________
_________

$         1.90
–
_________
$         1.90
_________
_________

$         1.88
–
_________
$         1.88
_________
_________
$       1.245
_________
_________

$         1.80
0.10
_________
$         1.90
_________
_________

$         1.79
0.09
_________
$         1.88
_________
_________
$         1.24
_________
_________

Thousands (year ended December 31)

Earnings invested in the business:
Balance at beginning of year
Net income
Cash dividends paid:

Redeemable preferred and preference stock
Common stock

Common stock repurchased
Common stock expense
Balance at end of year
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
Balance at beginning of year
Other comprehensive income (loss) – net of tax:

Recognition of foreign currency translation adjustment 
included in gain on sale of discontinued segment
Minimum pension liability adjustment
Change in unrealized loss from price risk management activities

–
(2,936)
227
________

Comprehensive income
Balance at end of year

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

30

N W N A T U R A L

$    (3,084)
________
________

2002

2001

2000

$ 147,950
43,792

(2,579)
(32,024)
–
(3)
________
$ 157,136
________
________

$      (375)

$   43,792

–
(2,936)
227
________
$   41,083
________
________

$ 134,189
50,187

(2,410)
(31,307)
(2,688)
(21)
________
$ 147,950
________
________

$            –

–
(148)
(227)
________

$       (375)
________
________

$   50,187

$   50,224

$ 118,711
50,224

(2,466)
(31,198)
(1,080)
(2)
________
$ 134,189
________
________

$   (3,181)

–
(148)
(227)
________
$   49,812
________
________

3,181
–
–
________

$            –
________
________

3,181
–
–
________
$   53,405
________
________

CONSOLIDATED 
BALANCE SHEETS

Thousands (December 31)
Assets:
Plant and property:

Utility plant
Less accumulated depreciation

Utility plant – net
Non-utility property
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

Non-utility property – net
Total plant and property

Other investments
Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents
Accounts receivable, less allowance for uncollectible accounts of $1,815 in 2002 and $1,962 in 2001
Accrued unbilled revenue
Inventories of gas, materials and supplies
Prepayments and other current assets

Total current assets

Regulatory assets:
Income tax asset
Unamortized loss on debt redemption
Unrealized loss on non-trading derivatives
Other

Total regulatory assets

Other assets:

Investment in life insurance
Fair value of non-trading derivatives
Other

Total other assets
Total assets

Capitalization and liabilities:
Capitalization (see Consolidated Statements of Capitalization):

Common stock
Premium on common stock
Earnings invested in the business
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

Total common stock equity
Redeemable preference stock
Redeemable preferred stock
Long-term debt

Total capitalization

Current liabilities:
Notes payable
Accounts payable
Long-term debt due within one year
Taxes accrued
Interest accrued
Other current and accrued liabilities

Total current liabilities

Regulatory liabilities:
Customer advances
Deferred gas costs payable
Unrealized gain on non-trading derivatives

Total regulatory liabilities

Other liabilities:

Deferred income taxes
Deferred investment tax credits
Fair value of non-trading derivatives
Other

Total other liabilities

Commitments and contingencies (see Note 12)

Total capitalization and liabilities

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

2002

2001

$  1,539,965
560,798
__________
979,167
__________
20,832
4,404
__________
16,428
__________
995,595
__________
12,703
__________

7,328
46,936
44,069
58,030
37,645
__________
194,008
__________

47,975
6,508
–
7,040
__________
61,523
__________

54,916
12,426
11,620
__________
78,962
__________
$  1,342,791
__________
__________

$       81,023
248,028
157,136
(3,084)
__________
483,103
–
8,250
445,945
__________
937,298
__________

69,802
74,436
20,000
7,822
2,902
30,045
__________
205,007
__________

$  1,465,079 
514,299
__________
950,780 
__________
18,203 
4,007
__________
14,196 
__________
964,976 
__________
23,233 
__________

10,440 
64,722 
57,749 
49,337 
28,086 
__________
210,334 
__________

48,469 
6,970 
111,641 
5,302 
__________
172,382 
__________

53,033 
–
11,064 
__________
64,097 
__________
$  1,435,022 
__________
__________

$       79,889
240,697
147,950
(375)
__________
468,161
25,000
9,000
378,377
__________
880,538
__________

108,291
70,698
40,000
22,539
3,658
28,396
__________
273,582
__________

1,791
10,635
12,426
__________
24,852
__________

1,985
10,089
–
__________
12,074
__________

141,732
7,824
–
26,078
__________
175,634
__________
–
__________
$  1,342,791
__________
__________

130,424
8,682
111,868
17,854
__________
268,828
__________
–
__________
$  1,435,022
__________
__________

N W N A T U R A L

31

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS 
OF CASH FLOWS

Thousands (year ended December 31)

Operating activities:

2002

2001

2000

Net income from continuing operations
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by continuing operations:

$     43,792

$     50,187

$     47,812

Depreciation and amortization
Gain on sale of assets
Loss provision for PGE acquisition costs
Minimum pension liability adjustment
Unrealized gain (loss) from price risk management activities
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits
Equity in (earnings) losses of investments
Allowance for funds used during construction
Deferred gas costs – net
Other

Cash from continuing operations before working capital changes

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

Accounts receivable – net of uncollectible accounts
Accrued unbilled revenue
Inventories of gas, materials and supplies
Accounts payable
Accrued interest and taxes
Other current assets and liabilities

Cash provided by continuing operating activities

Investing activities:

Acquisition and construction of utility plant assets
Investment in non-utility property
PGE acquisition costs
Proceeds from sale of discontinued segment
Proceeds from sale of assets
Other investments

Cash used in investing activities

Financing activities:

Common stock issued
Common stock repurchased
Redeemable preferred stock retired
Redeemable preference stock retired
Long-term debt issued
Long-term debt retired
Change in short-term debt
Cash dividend payments:

Redeemable preferred and preference stock
Common stock

Common stock expense

Cash provided by (used in) financing activities

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents – beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents – end of year

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

Cash paid during the period for:

Interest
Income taxes

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash financing activities:

Conversion to common stock:

7-1/4 % Series of Convertible Debentures

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

32

N W N A T U R A L

52,090
(221)
13,873
(2,936)
227
10,450
(988)
(550)
546
4,582
_________
120,865

17,786
13,680
(8,693)
3,738
(24,725)
1,176
_________
123,827

(79,530)
(2,629)
(4,316)
–
500
1,848
_________
(84,127)

6,533
–
(750)
(25,000)
90,000
(40,500)
(38,489)

49,640
–
–
(148)
(227)
(12,088)
321
(959)
27,062
1,345
_________
115,133

(3,969)
(12,130)
(2,454)
(40,000)
15,435
(494)
_________
71,521

(71,943)
(9,554)
(9,557)
–
3,256
529
_________
(87,269)

5,157
(5,792)
(750)
–
18,000
(20,000)
52,028

47,440
(491)
–
–
–
4,651
221
(789)
3,977
4,333
_________
107,154

(17,404)
(14,069)
(12,964)
42,535
1,988
(20,000)
_________
87,240

(80,444)
(6,923)
–
34,756
21,012
610
_________
(30,989)

4,826
(2,441)
(814)
–
75,000
(60,000)
(37,886)

(2,579)
(32,024)
(3)
_________
(42,812)

(3,112)
10,440
_________
$       7,328
_________
_________

(2,410)
(31,307)
(21)
_________
14,905

(843)
11,283
_________
$     10,440
_________
_________

(2,466)
(31,198)
(2)
_________
(54,981)

1,270
10,013
_________
$     11,283
_________
_________

$     34,640
$     33,474

$     33,034
$     25,201

$     35,592
$     22,552

$       1,932

$          413

$          589

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS
OF CAPITALIZATION

Thousands, except share amounts (December 31)

2002

2001

Common stock equity:

Common stock – par value $3-1/6 per share, authorized 60,000,000 shares: 
outstanding – 2002, 25,586,313 shares; 2001, 25,228,074 shares
Premium on common stock
Earnings invested in the business
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)

Total common stock equity

$     81,023
248,028
157,136
(3,084)
_________
483,103
_________

$     79,889
240,697
147,950
(375)
_________
468,161
_________

51%

Redeemable preference stock, authorized 2,000,000 shares; 
$6.95 Series, stated value $100 per share: outstanding – 
2002, none; 2001, 250,000 shares

Redeemable preferred stock, authorized 1,500,000 shares; 
$7.125 Series, stated value $100 per share: outstanding – 
2002, 82,500 shares; 2001, 90,000 shares

Long-term debt:

Medium-Term Notes
First Mortgage Debt:

–

–

25,000

8,250

1%

9,000

53%

3%

1%

8.050% Series A due 2002
6.750% Series B due 2002
5.550% Series B due 2002
6.400% Series B due 2003
6.340% Series B due 2005
6.380% Series B due 2005
6.450% Series B due 2005
6.050% Series B due 2006
6.310% Series B due 2007
6.800% Series B due 2007
6.500% Series B due 2008
7.450% Series B due 2010
6.665% Series B due 2011
7.130% Series B due 2012
8.260% Series B due 2014
7.000% Series B due 2017
6.600% Series B due 2018
8.310% Series B due 2019
7.630% Series B due 2019
9.050% Series A due 2021
7.250% Series B due 2023
7.500% Series B due 2023
7.520% Series B due 2023
7.720% Series B due 2025
6.520% Series B due 2025
7.050% Series B due 2026
7.000% Series B due 2027
6.650% Series B due 2027
6.650% Series B due 2028
7.740% Series B due 2030
7.850% Series B due 2030
5.820% Series B due 2032

Convertible Debentures
7-1/4% Series due 2012

Less long-term debt due within one year

Total long-term debt

Total capitalization

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

–
–
–
20,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
8,000
20,000
9,500
5,000
25,000
10,000
40,000
10,000
40,000
22,000
10,000
20,000
10,000
20,000
4,000
11,000
20,000
10,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
10,000
20,000
10,000
30,000

10,000
10,000
20,000
20,000
5,000
5,000
5,000
8,000
–
10,000
5,000
25,000
10,000
–
10,000
40,000
22,000
10,000
20,000
10,000
20,000
4,000
11,000
20,000
10,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
10,000
20,000
10,000
–

6,445
_________
465,945
20,000
_________
445,945
_________

$   937,298
_________
_________

8,377
_________
418,377
40,000
_________
378,377
_________

48%
______

100% $   880,538
_________
______
_________
______

43%
______

100%
______
______

N W N A T U R A L

33

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Organization and Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include:
Regulated utility:

■ Northwest Natural Gas Company (NW Natural)
Non-regulated wholly-owned subsidiary businesses:

■ NNG Financial Corporation (Financial Corporation), 
and its wholly-owned subsidiaries
■ Northwest Energy Corporation (Northwest Energy), 
and its wholly-owned subsidiary

Non-regulated majority-owned subsidiary business:

■ Canor Energy, Ltd. (Canor), sold in 2000
Together these businesses are referred to herein as the “Company.”

Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Investments in corporate joint ventures and partnerships in which
the Company’s ownership interest is 50 percent or less and over which
the Company does not exercise control are accounted for by the equi-
ty method or the cost method (see Note 9).

Certain amounts from prior years have been reclassified to con-
form with the 2002 presentation. These reclassifications had no impact
on prior year results of operations.
Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with gen-
erally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
reported amounts in the consolidated financial statements and accom-
panying notes. Actual amounts could differ from those estimates and
changes would be reported in future periods. Management believes
that the estimates used are reasonable.
Industry Regulation

The Company’s principal business is the distribution of natural
gas which is regulated by the Oregon Public Utility Commission
(OPUC) and the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission
(WUTC). Accounting records and practices conform to the require-
ments and uniform system of accounts prescribed by these regulato-
ry authorities in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 71, “Accounting for the Effects of Certain Types
of Regulation.”

In applying SFAS No. 71, NW Natural has capitalized certain
costs and benefits as regulatory assets and liabilities pursuant to orders
of the OPUC or WUTC in general rate or expense deferral proceed-
ings, to provide for recovery of revenues or expenses from, or refunds
to, utility customers in future periods. At Dec. 31, 2002 and 2001, reg-
ulatory tax assets were $48.0 million and $48.5 million, respective-
ly, while other regulatory assets and liabilities (net) were net liabili-
ties of $11.3 million and net assets of $111.8 million, respectively.

If NW Natural should determine in the future that all or a portion
of these regulatory assets and liabilities no longer meet the criteria for
continued application of SFAS No. 71, then it would be required to
write off the net unrecoverable balances of its regulatory assets and
liabilities as a charge to income.

34

N W N A T U R A L

In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.”
SFAS No. 143, which is effective for fiscal years beginning after June
15, 2002, requires that obligations associated with the retirement of
a tangible long-lived asset be recorded as a liability when those obli-
gations are incurred, with the amount of the liability initially meas-
ured at fair value. The liability for the asset retirement obligation is
recorded as a capitalized cost increasing the carrying amount of the
related long-lived asset. Over time, the liability is accreted to its pres-
ent value each period and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the
useful life of the related asset.

In April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, “Rescission of
FASB Statement Nos. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement
No. 13 and Technical Corrections,” effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002. SFAS No. 145,
which updates, clarifies and simplifies existing accounting pro-
nouncements, addresses the reporting of debt extinguishments and
accounting for certain lease modifications that have economic effects
that are similar to sale-leaseback transactions.

In July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for
Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities,” which replaces
Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for
Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an
Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring).” SFAS
No. 146 requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or
disposal activities, such as lease termination costs and certain employ-
ee severance costs, when they are incurred rather than at the date of
a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. The primary effect of apply-
ing SFAS No. 146, which is effective for all exit or disposal activities
initiated after Dec. 31, 2002, will be on the timing of recognition of
costs associated with exit or disposal activities.

The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption
of SFAS Nos. 143, 145 and 146 upon its financial condition and re-
sults of operations.
Adoption of New Accounting Standards

Effective Jan. 1, 2002, the Company adopted SFAS No. 141,
“Business Combinations,” and SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets.” SFAS No. 141 requires business combinations
initiated after June 30, 2001 to be accounted for using the purchase
method of accounting. It also specifies the types of acquired intan-
gible assets that are required to be recognized and reported sepa-
rately from goodwill. SFAS No. 142 requires goodwill, of which the
Company had none as of Dec. 31, 2002, and other intangibles with
indefinite lives to be tested for impairment at least annually rather than
being amortized as previously required. The adoption of SFAS No.
141 and SFAS No. 142 had no impact on the Company’s financial con-
dition or results of operations.

The Company also adopted SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” effective Jan. 1, 2002.
SFAS No. 144 establishes a single accounting model for recognition
and measurement of the impairment of long-lived assets to be held and
used, the measurement of long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale
and for segments of a business to be disposed of. SFAS No. 144 also
expands the scope of discontinued operations to include all compo-
nents of an entity that can be distinguished from the rest of the enti-
ty and will be eliminated from the ongoing operations of the entity in
a disposal transaction. The adoption of SFAS No. 144 had no impact
on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

On Dec. 31, 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, “Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure.” SFAS
No. 148 amends FASB No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Com-
pensation,” to provide alternative methods of transition for companies
that voluntarily change to the fair-value-based method of accounting
for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS No. 148
amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require promi-
nent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about
the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation
and the effect of the method used on reported results. The Company
has adopted the SFAS No. 148 disclosure requirements but continues
to apply Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Account-
ing for Stock Issued to Employees,” to account for its stock-based
compensation plans (see Note 4).
Utility Plant and Depreciation

Utility plant for NW Natural is stated at cost (see Note 9). When
a depreciable unit of utility plant is retired, the cost is removed from
both utility plant and accumulated depreciation together with the cost
of removal, less any salvage. No gain or loss is recognized upon nor-
mal retirement.

NW Natural’s provision for depreciation of utility property, which
is computed under the straight-line, age-life method in accordance with
independent engineering studies and as approved by regulatory author-
ities, approximated 3.5 percent of average depreciable plant in each
of 2002, 2001 and 2000. The depreciation rate approximates the eco-
nomic life of the utility property.
Allowance for Funds Used During Construction

Certain additions to utility plant include an allowance for funds used
during construction (AFUDC). AFUDC represents the cost of funds
borrowed during construction and is calculated using actual com-
mercial paper interest rates. If commercial paper borrowings are less
than the total costs of construction work in progress, then a compos-
ite rate of interest on all debt, shown as a reduction to interest charges,
and a return on equity funds, shown as other income, is used to com-
pute AFUDC. While cash is not realized currently from AFUDC, it
is realized in the ratemaking process over the service life of the relat-
ed property through increased revenues resulting from higher rate
base and higher depreciation expense. NW Natural’s weighted aver-
age AFUDC rates were 2.8 percent in 2002, 6.2 percent in 2001 and
6.0 percent in 2000.
Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of reporting cash flows, cash and cash equivalents
include cash on hand and highly liquid temporary investments with
original maturity dates of three months or less.
Revenue Recognition

Utility revenues are derived primarily from the sale and transporta-
tion of natural gas. Utility revenue from gas sales and transportation
is recognized when the gas is delivered to and received by the customer.
Estimated revenues are accrued for gas deliveries not billed to cus-
tomers from meter reading dates to month end (unbilled revenue) and
are reversed the following month when actual billings occur.

Revenues from non-utility services, including gas storage, are rec-
ognized upon delivery of the service to customers. Revenues from non-
utility optimization contracts are recognized, after deducting for reg-
ulatory revenue sharing, over the life of the contract for amounts
guaranteed under the contract, or as amounts are earned and reason-
ably estimable for amounts above the guaranteed value.

Inventories

Inventories, consisting primarily of natural gas in storage, are stat-

ed at the lower of average cost or net realizable value.
Derivatives Policy

NW Natural’s Derivatives Policy sets forth the guidelines for using
selected financial derivative products to support prudent risk man-
agement strategies within designated parameters. The Policy allows
for the use of derivatives to manage commodity prices related to nat-
ural gas purchases, foreign currency prices related to gas purchase com-
mitments from Canada, oil or propane commodity prices related to gas
sales and transportation services under rate schedules pegged to oth-
er commodities, and interest rates related to long-term debt maturing
in less than five years or expected to be issued in future periods. NW
Natural’s objectives for using derivatives are to decrease the volatili-
ty of earnings and cash flows associated with changes in commodity
prices, foreign currency prices and interest rates. Use of derivatives
is permitted only after the commodity price, exchange rate, and inter-
est rate exposures have been identified, are determined to exceed
defined tolerance levels and are considered to be unavoidable because
they are necessary to support normal business activities (see Note
11). The Policy is intended to prevent speculative risk. NW Natural
does not enter into derivative instruments for trading purposes and
believes that any increase in market risk created by holding derivatives
should be offset by the exposures they modify.

The Company adopted SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities,” on Jan. 1, 2001. This statement
establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instru-
ments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other
contracts, and for hedging activities. SFAS No. 133 requires that an
entity recognize derivatives as either assets or liabilities on the bal-
ance sheet and measure those instruments at fair value. SFAS No.
133 also requires that changes in the fair value of a derivative be rec-
ognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria
are met.

NW Natural designates its derivatives as fair value or cash flow
hedges based upon criteria established by SFAS No. 133. For a deriv-
ative designated as a fair value hedge, the gain or loss is recognized
in earnings in the period of change. For a derivative designated as a
cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the derivative gain or loss is
initially reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (OCI)
unless the derivative is subject to deferral under NW Natural’s regu-
lated tariffs with the OPUC or the WUTC. The ineffective portion of
the gain or loss in a cash flow hedge is recognized in current earnings.
Effectiveness is measured by comparing changes in cash flows of the
hedged item to gains or losses on derivative instruments.

NW Natural’s primary hedging activities, consisting of natural gas
commodity price and foreign currency exchange rate hedges, are prin-
cipally accounted for as cash flow hedges under SFAS No. 133 and
subject to regulatory deferral pursuant to SFAS No. 71. Unrealized
gains and losses from mark-to-market valuations of these contracts are
not recognized in current income but are reported as derivative assets
or liabilities and offset by a corresponding deferred account balance
included under “Regulatory liabilities” or “Regulatory assets.” Due
to their regulatory deferral treatment, effective portions of changes in
the fair value of these derivatives are not recorded in OCI but are rec-
ognized as a regulatory asset or liability. Ineffective portions of changes
in the fair value of these contracts are recognized in current earnings.

N W N A T U R A L

35

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NW Natural documents all relationships between its hedge con-
tracts and hedged items, as well as its risk management objective
and strategy. This process includes specific identification of the type
of contract, the details of the hedge transaction, the nature of the risk
being hedged and how the hedging instrument’s effectiveness will be
measured. Both at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing
basis, NW Natural measures the effectiveness of the derivatives used
in hedge transactions.
Income Taxes

NW Natural uses the balance sheet method of accounting for
deferred income taxes. Deferred tax liabilities and assets reflect the
expected future tax consequences, based on enacted tax law, of tem-
porary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and
their financial reporting amounts (see Note 8).

Consistent with rate and accounting orders of regulatory author-
ities, deferred income taxes are not currently collected for those tem-
porary income tax differences where the prescribed regulatory
accounting methods do not provide for current recovery in rates. NW
Natural has recorded a regulatory tax asset for amounts pending
recovery from customers in future rates. These amounts are prima-
rily differences between the book and tax bases of net utility plant in
service. This asset balance was $48.0 million and $48.5 million at Dec.
31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Investment tax credits on utility property additions and leveraged
leases, which reduce income taxes payable, are deferred for financial
statement purposes and are amortized over the life of the related prop-
erty or lease. Investment and energy tax credits generated by non-
regulated subsidiaries are amortized over a period of one to five years.
Other Income (Expense)

Other income (expense) consists of interest income, gain on sale
of assets, investment income of Financial Corporation, the loss pro-
vision related to costs incurred in connection with the effort to acquire
Portland General Electric Company (PGE) and other miscellaneous
income from merchandise sales, rents, an aircraft lease and other items.
Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share are computed based on the weighted aver-
age number of common shares outstanding each year. Diluted earn-
ings per share reflect the potential effects of the conversion of con-
vertible debentures and the exercise of stock options. Diluted earnings
are calculated as follows:
Thousands, except per share amounts
Earnings applicable to common stock – basic

2000
$   41,512 $   47,786 $   47,768
389
________ ________ ________
Earnings applicable to common stock – diluted $   41,797 $   48,156 $   48,157
________ ________ ________
________ ________ ________
Average common shares outstanding – basic
25,183
13
442
________ ________ ________
Average common shares outstanding – diluted
25,638
________ ________ ________
________ ________ ________
Earnings per share of common stock – basic
$       1.63 $       1.90 $       1.90
________ ________ ________
________ ________ ________
Earnings per share of common stock – diluted $       1.62 $       1.88 $       1.88
________ ________ ________
________ ________ ________

Stock options
Convertible debentures

25,431
59
324
25,814

25,159
32
421
25,612

Debenture interest less taxes

2002

2001

285

370

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company applies APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock
Issued to Employees,” to account for its stock-based compensation
plans. Accordingly, the Company does not recognize compensation
expense for the fair value of its stock-based awards. However, the
Company recognizes compensation expense for the market value of
stock awards granted under its Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) in
the period when performance shares are earned (see Note 4). The
Company has elected to continue using the intrinsic value method of
accounting for its stock-based awards rather than changing to the fair
value method of accounting until a uniform method of valuing and
expensing stock options is promulgated by the FASB.

2. CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARY OPERATIONS AND SEGMENT
INFORMATION:

At Dec. 31, 2002, the Company had two direct wholly-owned sub-
sidiaries, Financial Corporation and Northwest Energy. Northwest
Energy was formed in 2001 to serve as the holding company for NW
Natural and PGE if the acquisition of PGE had been completed.

The Company principally operates in a segment of business,
“Utility,” consisting of the distribution of natural gas. Another segment,
“Gas Storage,” primarily represents natural gas storage services pro-
vided to upstream interstate customers using storage capacity that
has been developed in advance of core utility customers’ require-
ments. The remaining segment, “Other,” primarily consists of non-reg-
ulated investments in alternative energy projects in California and a
Boeing 737-300 aircraft leased to Continental Airlines, and deferred
costs relating to the acquisition of PGE (see Note 9).
NNG Financial Corporation

Financial Corporation has several financial investments, including
investments as a limited partner in solar electric generating systems,
windpower electric generating projects and low-income housing proj-
ects. Financial Corporation disposed of its remaining interests in cer-
tain gas producing properties in the western United States in 2000 and
its partnership interest in a hydroelectric generating project in 2001.
Gas Storage

Gas storage services are provided to interstate customers using stor-
age capacity that has been developed in advance of core utility cus-
tomers’ requirements. NW Natural retains 80 percent of the income
before tax from gas storage services and credits the remaining 20
percent to a deferred regulatory account for sharing with its core
utility customers.

NW Natural also receives revenues, after deducting for amounts
shared with core utility customers, from a contract with an independ-
ent energy trading company that seeks to optimize the use of NW
Natural’s assets by trading temporarily unused portions of its gas stor-
age and upstream pipeline transportation capacity.
Canor Energy, Ltd.

In January 2000, the Company sold its interest in Canor, an Alberta,
Canada corporation that had been engaged in natural gas and oil ex-
ploration, development and production in Alberta and Saskatchewan,
Canada. The after-tax gain from the sale was $2.4 million, net of
Canadian tax on dividends ($0.6 million) and U.S. income tax ($2.8
million), and is shown as gain on sale of discontinued segment.

36

N W N A T U R A L

Segment Information

Stock Repurchase Program

The following table presents information about reportable segments
for 2002, 2001 and 2000. Inter-segment transactions are insignificant.

Utility

Gas
Storage

Other

Total

$  279,414 $      7,944 $         186 $  287,544
52,090
119,196
116,258
988

51,693
118,156
109,565
–

396
962
6,586
–

1
78
107
988

–
47,336
1,308,291

–
3,646
16,403

(8,414)
(8,414)
(7,190)
43,792
18,097 1,342,791

$  271,473 $      4,368 $         170 $  276,011
49,640
116,160
110,211

49,413
115,708
106,352

227
489
3,652

–
(37)
207

–
47,313
1,391,156

–
2,112
14,243

(321)
762

(321)
50,187
29,623 1,435,022

$  257,361 $         258 $         331 $  257,950
47,440
106,168
104,342

47,430
106,027
103,904

–
60
271

10
81
167

–

47,519

–

102

(221)

(221)

191

47,812

–
1,252,747

–
4,919

2,412
2,412
21,047 1,278,713

Thousands

2002
Net operating revenues
Depreciation and amortization
Other operating expenses
Income from operations
Income from financial investments
Loss provision for PGE 
transaction costs
Net income (loss)
Total assets at Dec. 31, 2002
2001
Net operating revenues
Depreciation and amortization
Other operating expenses (income)
Income from operations
Income (loss) from 
financial investments
Net income
Total assets at Dec. 31, 2001
2000
Net operating revenues
Depreciation and amortization
Other operating expenses
Income from operations
Income (loss) from 
financial investments
Net income from continuing 
operations
Gain on sale of discontinued 
segment
Total assets at Dec. 31, 2000

3. CAPITAL STOCK:

Common Stock

At Dec. 31, 2002, NW Natural had reserved 148,415 shares of
common stock for issuance under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan,
384,502 shares for future conversions of its 7-1/4% Convertible
Debentures, 568,665 shares under its Dividend Reinvestment and Stock
Purchase Plan, 1,892,014 shares under its Restated Stock Option Plan
(see Note 4), and 3,000,000 shares under the Shareholder Rights Plan.
Redeemable Preference Stock

On Dec. 31, 2002, NW Natural redeemed all 250,000 shares of its
$6.95 Series of Redeemable Preference Stock with proceeds from the
sale of commercial paper.
Redeemable Preferred Stock

The mandatory preferred stock redemption requirements aggregate
$0.8 million in each of 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007. These re-
quirements are non-cumulative. At any time NW Natural is in default
on any of its obligations to make the prescribed sinking fund payments,
it may not pay cash dividends on the common stock. Upon involun-
tary liquidation, all series of redeemable preferred stock are entitled
to their stated value.

The redeemable preferred stock is callable at stipulated prices,
plus accrued dividends. On or after May 1, 2002, shares of the $7.125
Series are redeemable at a price of $102.850 per share, decreasing each
year thereafter to $100 per share on or after May 1, 2008.

In May 2000, the Company commenced a program to repurchase
up to 2 million shares, or up to $35 million in value, of NW Natural’s
common stock through a repurchase program which has been extend-
ed through May 2003. The purchases are made in the open market or
through privately negotiated transactions. Since the program’s incep-
tion the Company has repurchased 355,400 shares of common stock
at a total cost of $8.2 million.
Restated Stock Option Plan

At the Company’s Annual Meeting in May 2002, the shareholders
approved an amendment to the Restated Stock Option Plan that
increased the total number of shares authorized for option grants from
1,200,000 to 2,400,000 shares. At Dec. 31, 2002, options on 1,428,200
shares were available for grant and options to purchase 463,814 shares
were outstanding.

The following table shows the changes in the number of shares of
NW Natural’s capital stock and the premium on common stock for the
years 2002, 2001 and 2000:

Balance, Dec. 31, 1999
Sales to employees
Sales to stockholders
Exercise of stock options – net
Conversion of convertible 
debentures to common
Stock repurchases
Sinking fund purchases

Balance, Dec. 31, 2000
Sales to employees
Sales to stockholders
Exercise of stock options – net
Conversion of convertible 
debentures to common
Stock repurchases
Sinking fund purchases

Balance, Dec. 31, 2001
Sales to employees
Sales to stockholders
Exercise of stock options – net
Conversion of convertible 
debentures to common
Sinking fund purchases
Redemption

Balance, Dec. 31, 2002

Redeemable Redeemable
preferred

————–— Shares ————–— Premium on
common
stock
stock (thousands)
105,643 $ 234,608
278
3,769
81

preference
stock
250,000
–
–
–

Common
stock
25,091,938
14,696
199,920
5,990

–
–
–

495
–
29,580
( 1,016)
–
(108,700)
–
–
–
__________ ________ ________ ________
238,215
250,000
25,233,424
498
–
30,952
3,854
–
177,624
110
–
12,289

–
–
(8,143)
97,500
–
–
–

343
–
20,485
(2,323)
–
(246,700)
–
–
–
__________ ________ ________ ________
240,697
250,000
25,228,074
748
–
42,862
3,854
–
157,288
1,105
–
61,020

–
–
(7,500)
90,000
–
–
–

1,624
–
97,069
–
–
–
(250,000)
–
–
__________ ________ ________ ________
82,500 $ 248,028
–
25,586,313
__________ ________ ________ ________
__________ ________ ________ ________

–
(7,500)
–

4. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION:

NW Natural has the following stock-based compensation plans: the
Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP); the Restated Stock Option Plan
(Restated SOP) (formerly the 1985 Stock Option Plan); the Employee
Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP); and the Non-Employee Directors Stock
Compensation Plan (NEDSCP). These plans are designed to promote
stock ownership in NW Natural by employees, officers and directors.
NW Natural’s shareholders approved the LTIP effective Jan. 1,
2001, to provide a flexible, competitive compensation program for eli-
gible officers. An aggregate of 500,000 shares of common stock was
authorized for grants under the LTIP as stock bonus, restricted stock
or performance-based stock awards. Shares awarded under the LTIP
are purchased on the open market. To date, NW Natural has granted
three performance-based awards, one based on a two-year performance
period (2001-02) and two based on three-year performance periods
(2001-03 and 2002-04), and a restricted stock award. The aggregate

N W N A T U R A L

37

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

target awards for each of the two-year (2001-02) and three-year (2001-
03) performance-based award periods were 26,000 shares and the
maximum awards were 52,000 shares. The aggregate target and max-
imum awards for the three-year performance-based award period
(2002-04) were 29,000 and 58,000 shares, respectively. Final awards
depend on the attainment of certain return on equity performance
goals. At Dec. 31, 2002, the two-year performance-based award cov-
ering the period 2001-02 lapsed because the performance-based meas-
ures were not achieved. The restricted stock award consists of 4,500
shares granted in 2001 with a vesting period of 65 months. The LTIP
stock awards are compensatory awards for which compensation
expense is accrued based upon the market value of performance shares
earned, or a pro rata amortization over the vesting period for restrict-
ed shares.

The Restated SOP authorizes an aggregate of 2,400,000 shares of
common stock for issuance as incentive or non-statutory stock options.
These options may be granted only to officers and key employees
designated by a committee of NW Natural’s Board of Directors. All
options are granted at an option price not less than the market value
at the date of grant and may be exercised for a period not exceeding
10 years from the date of grant. Option holders may exchange shares
they have owned for at least six months, at the current market price,
to purchase shares at the option price. Since inception in 1985, options
on 1,100,921 shares of common stock have been granted at prices
ranging from $11.75 to $27.875 per share, and options on 129,121
shares have expired.

In accordance with APB No. 25, no compensation expense is rec-
ognized for the Restated SOP or the ESPP. If compensation expense
for awards under the Restated SOP and the ESPP had been deter-
mined based on fair value at the grant dates using the method pre-
scribed by SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensa-
tion,” net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to
the pro forma amounts shown below:

Earnings applicable to common stock ($000):

As reported
Deduct: total stock-based compensation 
expense determined under fair value 
based method – net of tax
Pro forma

Basic earnings per share

As reported
Pro forma

Diluted earnings per share

As reported
Pro forma

2002

2001

2000

$   41,512 $   47,786 $   47,768

(478)

(353)
________ ________ ________
$   41,034 $   47,448 $   47,415
________ ________ ________
________ ________ ________

(338)

$       1.63 $       1.90 $       1.90
$       1.61 $       1.89 $       1.88

$       1.62 $       1.88 $       1.88
$      1.60 $       1.87 $       1.86

The fair value of each stock option grant is estimated on the grant
date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the follow-
ing weighted average assumptions:

2002
4.8%
29.1%
3.6%
7

2000
4.7%
31.4%
5.2%
7
$     20.49 $     17.34 $     14.18

2001
4.9%
31.0%
5.2%
7

Dividend yield
Expected volatility
Risk-free interest rate
Expected life (years)
Present value of options granted

38

N W N A T U R A L

Information regarding the Restated SOP’s activity is summarized

as follows:

Balance, Dec. 31, 1999

Granted
Exercised
Expired

Balance, Dec. 31, 2000

Granted
Exercised
Expired

Balance, Dec. 31, 2001

Granted
Exercised
Expired

Balance, Dec. 31, 2002

Shares
290,212
153,000
(14,207)
(13,000)
________
416,005
15,000
(12,289)
(31,625)
________
387,091
163,750
(68,827)
(18,200)
________
463,814

Range

20.25 – 22.875
16.59 – 24.00
20.25 – 27.875
20.17 – 27.875
24.91

——— Price per Share ———
Weighted
Average
$    16.59 – 27.875 $    24.08
20.36
22.63
24.36
22.75
24.91
20.36
24.31
22.79
26.35
21.74
25.43
24.10

20.17 – 20.92
20.25 – 27.875
20.25 – 27.875
26.07 – 27.85
20.25 – 27.875
20.25 – 27.875
20.25 – 27.875

The weighted average characteristics of outstanding stock options

at Dec. 31, 2002 were as follows:
————————– Outstanding Options ————————–
Remaining
Range of
Life
Exercise
(Years)
Prices
6.64
$20.25 – 27.875

Shares
463,814

– Exercisable Options –
Weighted
Average
Price
244,864 $    23.31

Shares

The ESPP, as amended in 2000, allows employees to purchase
common stock at 85 percent of the opening market price on the sub-
scription date which is set annually. Each eligible employee may pur-
chase up to 900 shares through payroll deduction over a six to 12-
month period.

Non-employee directors of the Company are awarded approxi-
mately $100,000 worth of the Company’s common stock upon join-
ing the Board pursuant to NW Natural’s NEDSCP. These initial awards
vest in monthly installments over the five calendar years following the
award. On Jan. 1 of each year thereafter, non-employee directors are
awarded an additional $20,000 of common stock which vests in month-
ly installments in the fifth year following the award (after the previ-
ous award has fully vested). All awards vest immediately upon a
change in control of the Company. Unvested shares are forfeited if the
recipient ceases to be a director. The shares awarded are purchased in
the open market by the Company at the time of award. Directors may
elect to defer unvested shares into their stock accounts under the
Directors Deferred Compensation Plan. Non-employee directors also
may elect to receive shares of common stock instead of a cash pay-
ment for their fees and retainers under a separate plan.

5. LONG-TERM DEBT:

The issuance of first mortgage debt, including secured medium-
term notes, under the Mortgage and Deed of Trust (Mortgage) is lim-
ited by property additions, adjusted net earnings and other provisions
of the Mortgage. The Mortgage constitutes a first mortgage lien on
substantially all of NW Natural’s utility property.

The 7-1/4 % Series of Convertible Debentures may be converted
at any time into 50-1/4 shares of common stock for each $1,000 face
value ($19.90 per share).

The maturities for the five years ending Dec. 31, 2007 on the long-
term debt outstanding at Dec. 31, 2002 amount to: $20 million in 2003,
no maturity in 2004, $15 million in 2005, $8 million in 2006 and
$29.5 million in 2007. Holders of certain medium-term notes have put
options that, if exercised, would accelerate the maturity of long-term
debt by $10 million and $20 million in 2005 and 2007, respectively.

6. NOTES PAYABLE AND LINES OF CREDIT:

The Company’s primary source of short-term funds is commercial
paper notes payable. Both NW Natural and Financial Corporation
issue commercial paper under agency agreements with a commercial
bank. NW Natural’s commercial paper is supported by its committed
bank lines of credit (see below), while Financial Corporation’s com-
mercial paper is supported by committed bank lines of credit and the
guaranty of NW Natural. The amounts and average interest rates of
commercial paper debt outstanding at Dec. 31 were as follows:

Thousands
NW Natural
Financial Corporation
Total

–––––– 2001 ––––––
–––––– 2002 ––––––
Rate
Amount
Rate
Amount
1.4% $ 108,291
$   69,802
2.6%
–
–
________
________
$ 108,291
$   69,802
________
________
________
________

NW Natural has lines of credit with four commercial banks total-
ing $150 million. Half of the credit with each bank, totaling $75 mil-
lion, is committed and available through Sept. 30, 2003, and the oth-
er $75 million is committed and available through Sept. 30, 2004. In
addition, Financial Corporation has available through Sept. 30, 2003,
committed lines of credit with two commercial banks totaling $20
million. Financial Corporation’s lines are supported by the guaranty
of NW Natural.

Under the terms of these lines of credit, NW Natural and Financial
Corporation pay commitment fees but are not required to maintain
compensating bank balances. The interest rates on borrowings under
these lines of credit, if any, are based on current market rates. There
were no outstanding balances on either the NW Natural or Financial
Corporation lines of credit as of Dec. 31, 2002 or 2001.

NW Natural’s lines of credit require that credit ratings be main-

tained in effect at all times and that notice be given of any change in
its senior unsecured debt ratings. A change in NW Natural’s credit
rating is not an event of default, nor is the maintenance of a specif-
ic minimum level of credit rating a condition to drawing upon the lines
of credit. However, interest rates on any loans outstanding under NW
Natural’s bank lines are tied to credit ratings, which would increase
or decrease the cost of bank debt, if any, when ratings are changed.
The lines of credit require that the Company maintain an indebted-
ness to total capitalization ratio, as defined in the credit agreements,
of 65 percent or less. Also, effective Oct. 1, 2002, the lines of cred-
it require the Company to maintain a net worth at least equal to 80
percent of its net worth at Sept. 30, 2002, plus 50 percent of the
Company’s net income for each subsequent fiscal quarter. Failure to
comply with either of these covenants would entitle the banks to ter-
minate their lending commitments and to accelerate the maturity of
all amounts outstanding. At Dec. 31, 2002, the Company was in com-
pliance with both the debt to total capital covenant and the minimum
net worth covenant.

7. PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS:

NW Natural has two qualified non-contributory defined benefit
pension plans covering all regular employees with more than one year
of service, a non-qualified supplemental pension plan for eligible
executive officers and other postretirement benefit plans for its employ-
ees. The following tables provide a reconciliation of the changes in the
plans’ benefit obligations and fair value of assets over the three-year
period ended Dec. 31, 2002 and a statement of the funded status and
amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets as of Dec. 31,
2002, 2001 and 2000:

Thousands
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at Jan. 1
Service cost
Interest cost
Expected benefits paid
Plan amendments
Net actuarial (gain) loss
Benefit obligation at Dec. 31

Change in plan assets:

Fair value of plan assets at Jan. 1
Actual return on plan assets
Employer contributions
Benefits paid
Fair value of plan assets at Dec. 31

Funded status:

Funded status at Dec. 31
Unrecognized transition obligation
Unrecognized prior service cost
Unrecognized net actuarial (gain) loss
Net amount recognized

Amounts recognized in the consolidated 
balance sheets at Dec. 31:
Prepaid benefit cost
Accrued benefit liability
Intangible asset
Other comprehensive loss
Net amount recognized

––––––––––––––– Pension Benefits –––––––––––––––
2000

2002

2001

–––––––––– Other Postretirement Benefits ––––––––––
2000

2001

2002

$     166,751
4,637
11,807
(9,453)
–
11,382
__________
185,124
__________

168,964
(17,082)
735
(9,453)
__________
143,164
__________

(41,960)
–
7,371
42,060
__________
$         7,471
__________
__________

$       17,339
(18,741)
4,438
4,435
__________
$         7,471
__________
__________

$ 146,802
3,964
11,332
(9,152)
1,838
11,967
________
166,751
________

190,451
(13,077)
742
(9,152)
________
168,964
________

2,212
351
8,575
(2,956)
________
$     8,182
________
________

$   17,211
(9,346)
169
148
________
$     8,182
________
________

$ 136,198
3,475
10,312
(8,035)
12
4,840
________
146,802
________

193,427
4,351
708
(8,035)
________
190,451
________

43,649
701
8,022
(47,661)
________
$     4,711
________
________

$   13,150
(8,932)
493
–
________
$     4,711
________
________

$   16,987
395
1,174
(979)
(300)
1,180
________
18,457
________

–
–
979
(979)
________
–
________

(18,457)
4,226
–
4,437
________
$    (9,794)
________
________

$            –
(9,794)
–
–
________
$    (9,794)
________
________

$   14,069
325
1,116
(942)
–
2,419
________
16,987
________

–
–
942
(942)
________
–
________

(16,987)
4,795
172
3,405
________
$    (8,615)
________
________

$            –
(8,615)
–
–
________
$    (8,615)
________
________

$   11,902
234
995
(878)
–
1,816
________
14,069
________

–
–
878
(878)
________
–
________

(14,069)
5,232
191
1,061
________
$    (7,585)
________
________

$            –
(7,585)
–
–
________
$    (7,585)
________
________

N W N A T U R A L

39

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The Company’s qualified defined benefit pension plans had an
accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets at Dec. 31,
2002. The plans’ aggregate accumulated benefit obligation was $172
million, $156 million and $136 million at Dec. 31, 2002, 2001 and
2000, respectively. Plan assets were $143 million, $169 million and
$190 million, respectively. The fair value of plan assets declined from
Dec. 31, 2001 to Dec. 31, 2002 due to $15 million in investment
losses, $9.8 million in withdrawals to pay benefits and $1.0 million
in eligible expenses of the plans. The combination of investment
returns and cash contributions is expected to provide sufficient funds
to cover all benefit obligations of the plans; the Company expects to
make cash contributions to the plans totaling $1.9 million for the
2003 plan year.

The Company’s non-qualified supplemental pension plan had an
accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets for each of the

periods presented. The plan’s aggregate accumulated benefit obliga-
tion was $12.8 million, $10.7 million and $10.4 million at Dec. 31,
2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. There were no plan assets in the
non-qualified plan due to the nature of the plan, but the Company
funds its obligation with trust-owned life insurance. The amount of the
life insurance coverage is designed to provide sufficient returns to
cover the benefit obligations and other costs of the plan.

The Company’s plans for providing postretirement benefits other
than pensions also have no plan assets. The aggregate benefit obligation
for those plans was $18.5 million, $17.0 million and $14.1 million at
Dec. 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

The following tables provide the components of net periodic cost
(benefit) for the plans for the years ended Dec. 31, 2002, 2001 and
2000, and the assumptions used in the measurement of these costs and
the Company’s benefit obligations:

Thousands
Service cost
Interest cost
Expected return on plan assets
Amortization of transition obligation
Amortization of prior service cost
Recognized actuarial (gain) loss
Net periodic cost (benefit)
Weighted average assumptions as of Dec. 31:

Discount rate
Expected return on plan assets
Rate of compensation increase

––––––––––––––– Pension Benefits –––––––––––––––
2000
$     3,475
10,312
(16,056)
334
1,174
(3,449)
________
$    (4,210)
________
________

2001
$        3,964
11,332
(17,198)
351
1,284
(2,464)
________
$    (2,731)
________
________

2002
$     4,637
11,807
(16,335)
351
1,204
(216)
________
$     1,448
________
________

–––––––––– Other Postretirement Benefits ––––––––––
2000
$        234
995
–
436
19
–
________
$     1,684
________
________

2002
$        395
1,174
–
436
6
147
________
$     2,158
________
________

2001
$        325
1,116
–
436
19
75
________
$     1,971
________
________

6.75%
8.00%
4.25-5.00%

7.25%
9.00%
4.25-5.00%

7.50%
9.00%
4.25-5.00%

6.75%
n/a
n/a

7.25%
n/a
n/a

7.50%
n/a
n/a

required to allow RKSP participants the option of receiving the div-
idends paid on the Company’s common stock in the ESOP account in
cash rather than having the dividends automatically reinvested (see
Note 8).

8. INCOME TAXES:

A reconciliation between income taxes calculated at the statutory
federal tax rate and the tax provision reflected in the financial state-
ments is as follows:
Thousands

2001

2002

2000

Computed income taxes based on statutory 
federal income tax rate of 35%
Increase (reduction) in taxes resulting from:

Difference between book and 
tax depreciation
Current state income tax, net of federal 
tax benefit
Federal income tax credits
Amortization of investment tax credits
Gains on Company and trust-owned 
life insurance
Removal costs
Reversal of amounts provided in prior years
Deduction for dividends paid on certain 
employer securities to an ESOP
Other – net

Total provision for income taxes
Total income taxes paid

$   23,533 $   27,209 $   26,124

222

222

222

2,299
(362)
(858)

(487)
(573)
(240)

2,672
(362)
(855)

(576)
(508)
(72)

2,622
(357)
(855)

(611)
(480)
(25)

–
(177)

(204)
114

–
189
________ ________ ________
$   23,444 $   27,553 $   26,829
________ ________ ________
________ ________ ________
$   33,474 $   25,201 $   22,552
________ ________ ________
________ ________ ________

The assumed annual trend rates used in measuring postretirement
benefits as of Dec. 31, 2002 were 10 percent for medical and 15 per-
cent for prescription drugs. Medical costs were assumed to decrease
gradually each year to a rate of 4.5 percent for 2008, while prescrip-
tion drug costs were assumed to decrease gradually each year to a
rate of 4.5 percent for 2013.

Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the
amounts reported for the health care plans. A one percent change in
assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:
1% Decrease
Thousands

1% Increase

Effect on the total service and interest cost 
components of net periodic postretirement 
health care benefit cost
Effect on the health care component of the 
accumulated postretirement benefit obligation

$          45

$         (45)

$        488

$       (476)

NW Natural’s Retirement K Savings Plan (RKSP) is a qualified
defined contribution plan under Internal Revenue Code Section 401(k).
NW Natural also has a non-qualified deferred compensation plan for
eligible officers and senior managers. These plans are designed to
enhance the retirement program of employees and to assist them in
strengthening their financial security by providing an incentive to
save and invest regularly. NW Natural’s matching contributions to
these plans totaled $1.4 million in 2002 and $1.3 million in both 2001
and 2000.

Effective Jan. 1, 2002, the RKSP was amended to establish an
Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) within the RKSP by con-
verting the existing RKSP Company Stock Fund into an ESOP. This
amendment allowed the Company to claim a tax benefit of $0.2 mil-
lion in 2002 for the dividends paid on the Company’s common stock
held by the ESOP. In order to claim this deduction, the Company was

40

N W N A T U R A L

Investment and energy tax credits restored:

Total investments and other

The provision for income taxes consists of the following:

Thousands

2002

2001

2000

Income taxes currently payable:

Federal
State

Total

Deferred taxes – net:

Federal
State

Total

$     9,377 $   32,682 $   18,228
2,444
________ ________ ________
20,672
________ ________ ________

1,239
10,616

5,912
38,594

7,495
(483)
________ ________ ________
7,012
________ ________ ________

(8,606)
(1,580)
(10,186)

11,476
2,210
13,686

From utility operations
From subsidiary operations

Total

Total provision for income taxes
Percentage of pretax income

(800)
(58)
(858)

(800)
(55)
(855)

(800)
(55)
________ ________ ________
(855)
________ ________ ________
$   23,444 $   27,553 $   26,829
________ ________ ________
________ ________ ________
35.9%
________ ________ ________
________ ________ ________

34.9%

35.4%

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are comprised of the following:
2001

2002

Thousands
Deferred tax liabilities:
Plant and property
Regulatory income tax asset
Regulatory liabilities
Other deferred liabilities

Total

Deferred tax assets:
Regulatory assets
Minimum pension liability
Other deferred assets

Total

Net accumulated deferred income tax liability

$   96,525 $   84,976
48,469
–
7,645
________ ________
141,090
________ ________

47,975
319
6,569
151,388

–
1,883
7,773
9,656

2,270
–
8,396
________ ________
10,666
________ ________
$ 141,732 $ 130,424
________ ________
________ ________

A $1.9 million tax benefit associated with a charge related to
accrual of minimum pension liability was recorded in OCI for the
year ended Dec. 31, 2002.

9. PROPERTY AND INVESTMENTS:

The following table sets forth the major classifications of NW

Natural’s utility plant and accumulated depreciation at Dec. 31:

Amount
Thousands
Transmission and distribution $1,254,624
Utility storage
107,110
General
83,878
Intangible and other
53,291
_________
1,498,903
11,301
29,761
_________
1,539,965

Gas stored long-term
Construction work in progress

Utility plant in service

Total utility plant

––––––– 2001 –––––––
Average
Depreciation
Rate
3.4%
2.6%
6.0%
5.8%
3.5%

––––––– 2002 –––––––
Average
Depreciation
Amount
Rate
3.4% $1,196,824
106,500
2.7%
80,411
6.3%
4.3%
50,274
_________
3.5% 1,434,009
11,301
19,769
_________
1,465,079

Less accumulated 
depreciation

Utility plant – net

560,798
_________
$   979,167
_________
_________

514,299
_________
$   950,780
_________
_________

The following table summarizes the Company’s investments in

non-utility plant at Dec. 31:
Thousands
Non-utility storage
Dock, land, oil station and other

Total non-utility plant

Less accumulated depreciation
Non-utility plant – net

2002

2001
$   17,037 $   14,480
3,723
________ ________
18,203
4,007
________ ________
$   16,428 $   14,196
________ ________
________ ________

3,795
20,832
4,404

The following table summarizes the Company’s investments in
entities accounted for under the equity and cost methods, and its
investment in an aircraft leveraged lease at Dec. 31:
Thousands
Deferred costs for pending purchase 
of PGE, net of loss provision
Aircraft leveraged lease
Gas pipeline and other
Electric generation
Long-term notes receivable

$            – $     9,557
6,987
3,234
3,155
300
________ ________
$   12,703 $   23,233
________ ________
________ ________

6,489
2,950
3,264
–

2001

2002

Financial Corporation has ownership interests ranging from 4.0 to
5.3 percent in solar electric generation plants located near Barstow,
California. Power generated by these plants is sold to Southern California
Edison Company under long-term contracts. Financial Corporation
also has ownership interests ranging from 25 to 41 percent in wind-
power electric generation projects located near Livermore and Palm
Springs, California. The wind-generated power is sold to Pacific Gas
and Electric Company and Southern California Edison Company under
long-term contracts.

Financial Corporation has a 10 percent ownership interest in a 19-
mile interstate natural gas pipeline. NW Natural is the operator of
this pipeline.

In 1987, the Company invested in a Boeing 737-300 aircraft, which
is leased to Continental Airlines for 20 years under a leveraged lease
agreement.

10. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:

The estimated fair values of NW Natural’s financial instruments
have been determined using available market information and appro-
priate valuation methodologies. The following are financial instruments
whose carrying values are sensitive to market conditions:

Thousands
Redeemable preference stock
Redeemable preferred stock
Long-term debt including 
amount due within one year

––– Dec. 31, 2002 –––
Carrying Estimated
Amount Fair Value

––– Dec. 31, 2001 –––
Estimated
Carrying
Fair Value
Amount
$            – $            – $   25,000 $   25,347
$     8,250 $     8,333 $     9,000 $     9,256

$ 465,945 $ 518,495 $ 418,377 $ 407,239

Fair value of the redeemable preference stock and the redeemable
preferred stock was estimated using quoted market prices. Interest
rates for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities were used
to estimate fair value for debt issues.

11. USE OF FINANCIAL DERIVATIVES:

NW Natural enters into short-term and long-term natural gas pur-
chase contracts with suppliers, including contracts tied to floating
prices. As such, NW Natural is exposed to changes in commodity
prices. Natural gas prices are subject to fluctuations due to unpre-
dictable factors including weather, inventory levels, pipeline trans-
portation availability, and the economy, each of which affects short-
term supply and demand. As part of its overall strategy to maintain an
acceptable level of exposure to gas price fluctuations, NW Natural uses
a targeted mix of fixed-rate and cap-protected derivatives to hedge the
exposure under floating price gas supply contracts. Swap contracts are
used to convert certain long-term gas purchase contracts from float-
ing prices to fixed prices, and call option contracts are used to limit
the maximum adverse impact from floating price contracts while
retaining the potential favorable impact from declining gas prices.

N W N A T U R A L

41

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The prices embedded in these commodity hedge contracts are incor-
porated in NW Natural’s annual rate changes, pursuant to its Oregon
Purchased Gas Adjustment (PGA) tariff, thereby limiting customers’
exposure to frequent changes in purchased gas costs. The estimated
fair value gains and losses from commodity hedge contracts are record-
ed as a derivative asset or liability, and are offset by a corresponding
amount recorded to a deferred regulatory asset or liability account for
the effective portion of each hedge contract. The actual gains and
losses realized at settlement of the hedge contract are used to offset
the actual purchase cost from NW Natural’s physical supply contract.
Certain natural gas purchases from Canadian suppliers are invoiced
in Canadian dollars, including both commodity and demand charges,
thereby exposing NW Natural to adverse changes in foreign curren-
cy rates. Foreign currency forward contracts are used to minimize the
impact of fluctuations in currency rates. Foreign currency contracts
for commodity costs are purchased on a month-to-month basis because
the Canadian cost is priced at the average noonday exchange rate for
each month. Foreign currency contracts for demand costs have terms
ranging up to 24 months. The gains and losses on the shorter-term cur-
rency contracts for commodity costs are recognized immediately in
cost of gas. The gains and losses on the longer-term currency contracts
for demand charges are subject to a regulatory deferral tariff and, as
such, are recorded as a derivative asset or liability which is offset by
a corresponding amount to a deferred asset or liability account.

NW Natural did not use any derivative instruments to hedge oil or

propane prices or interest rates during 2002 or 2001.

At Dec. 31, 2002, NW Natural had the following derivatives out-
standing covering its exposures to commodity and foreign currency
prices: a series of 18 natural gas price swap contracts, three natural
gas call option contracts, and 83 foreign currency forward contracts.
Each of these contracts was designated as a cash flow hedge. NW
Natural also had one physical natural gas supply contract with an
embedded derivative, which did not qualify as a normal purchase or
sales contract. The estimated fair values and the notional amounts of
derivative instruments outstanding were as follows:

Thousands
Fixed-price natural gas 
commodity swaps
Fixed-price natural gas 
call options
Physical natural gas supply 
contract with embedded option
Foreign currency forward 
purchase contracts

Total

––– Dec. 31, 2001 –––
––– Dec. 31, 2002 –––
Notional
Fair Value
Notional
Fair Value
Amount
Gain (Loss) Amount Gain (Loss)

$     11,422 $ 159,724 $(110,935) $ 254,209

717

448

18,084

(832)

6,390

2,754

–

–

(161)

10,223
_________ ________ ________ ________
$     12,426 $ 196,087 $(111,868) $ 270,822
_________ ________ ________ ________
_________ ________ ________ ________

15,525

(101)

In 2002, NW Natural realized net losses of $75.5 million from the
settlement of natural gas commodity swap and call option contracts,
which were recorded as increases to the cost of gas, compared to net
gains of $57.6 million during 2001. The currency exchange rate in all
foreign currency forward purchase contracts is included in NW
Natural’s cost of gas at settlement; therefore, no gain or loss was
recorded from the settlement of those contracts. The change in value
of cash flow hedge contracts, not included in regulatory recovery, is
included in OCI. In 2002 and 2001, the Company recognized a $0.2
million gain and a $0.2 million loss, respectively, in OCI from these
changes in value of cash flow hedge contracts.

42

N W N A T U R A L

The fair value of derivative instruments at Dec. 31, 2002 (see table
above) was determined using estimated or quoted market prices for
the periods covered by the contracts. Market prices for the natural
gas commodity-price swap and call option contracts were obtained
from external sources. NW Natural reviews these third-party valua-
tions for reasonableness using fair value calculations for other con-
tracts with similar terms and conditions. The market prices for the for-
eign currency forward contracts were based on currency exchange
rates quoted by The Bank of Canada.

As of Dec. 31, 2002, NW Natural had two natural gas commodi-
ty swap contracts extending beyond Dec. 31, 2003, but none extends
beyond Oct. 31, 2004. None of the natural gas commodity call option
contracts extends beyond March 31, 2003.

12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:

Lease Commitments

The Company leases land, buildings and equipment under agree-
ments that expire in various years through 2006. Rental expense under
operating leases was $4.8 million, $4.7 million and $4.9 million for
the years ended Dec. 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The table
below reflects the future minimum lease payments due under non-can-
celable leases at Dec. 31, 2002. Such payments total $13.8 million for
operating leases. The net present value of payments on capital leases
less imputed interest was $0.2 million. These commitments principally
relate to the lease of the Company’s office headquarters, underground
gas storage facilities, vehicles and computer equipment.

Millions
Operating leases
Capital leases
Minimum lease payments

Purchase Commitments

2003
$   2.9
0.2
_____
$   3.1
_____
_____

2004
$   2.7
–
_____
$   2.7
_____
_____

2005
$   2.6
–
_____
$   2.6
_____
_____

2006
$   1.0
–
_____
$   1.0
_____
_____

2007
$   0.3
–
_____
$   0.3
_____
_____

Later
years
$   4.3
–
_____
$   4.3
_____
_____

NW Natural has signed agreements providing for the availability
of firm pipeline capacity under which it must make fixed monthly pay-
ments for contracted capacity. The pricing component of the month-
ly payment is established, subject to change, by U.S. or Canadian reg-
ulatory bodies. In addition, NW Natural has entered into long-term
sale agreements to release firm pipeline capacity. The aggregate
amounts of these agreements were as follows at Dec. 31, 2002:

Thousands
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008 through 2023

Total
Less: Amount representing interest
Total at present value

Capacity
Purchase

Capacity
Release
Agreements Agreements
$   75,112 $     3,698
3,536
3,382
3,235
3,092
8,047
________ ________
24,990
4,687
________ ________
$ 289,632 $   20,303
________ ________
________ ________

44,064
40,201
35,912
34,380
152,093
381,762
92,130

NW Natural’s total payments of fixed charges under capacity pur-
chase agreements in 2002, 2001 and 2000 were $86.2 million, $86.5
million and $81.5 million, respectively. Included in the amounts for
2002, 2001 and 2000 were reductions for capacity release sales of $4.2
million, $3.8 million and $3.8 million, respectively. In addition, per-
unit charges are required to be paid based on the actual quantities
shipped under the agreements. In certain take-or-pay purchase com-
mitments, annual deficiencies may be offset by prepayments subject
to recovery over a longer term if future purchases exceed the mini-

NW Natural has accrued all material loss contingencies relating
to environmental matters that it believes to be probable of assertion
and reasonably estimable. Due to the preliminary nature of these envi-
ronmental investigations, the range of any additional possible loss
contingency cannot be currently estimated. NW Natural expects that
its costs of further investigation and remediation for which it may be
responsible with respect to the Gasco site, the Wacker site, the Portland
Harbor site and the Portland Gas site, if any, should be recoverable,
in large part, from insurance. At Dec. 31, 2002, NW Natural had a $2.5
million receivable representing an estimate of the environmental costs
NW Natural expects to recover from insurance, including $1.4 mil-
lion that was recorded in 2000 for costs relating to the Gasco site and
$1.1 million that was recorded in 2002 for costs relating to the Portland
Harbor site. In the event these costs are not recovered from insur-
ance, NW Natural will seek recovery through future rates.
Litigation

In November 2001, NW Natural commenced a lawsuit, (Northwest
Natural Gas Company v. Cascade Resources Corporation and Curry,
et. al.) (United States District Court for the District of Oregon, Case
No. CV 01-1620 HU), alleging that the defendants violated obliga-
tions regarding the use and disclosure of confidential information and
used such information to solicit and secure underground gas storage
leases in areas of interest to the Company. Among other remedies, the
Company seeks to have a constructive trust imposed on such leases
and to require the defendants to assign their interest in such leases
to the Company.

The defendants in this case have asserted counterclaims against the
Company alleging that by asserting that the defendants have misused
confidential information, the Company improperly interfered with
the defendants’ business opportunities. The assertions include claims
for violation of antitrust laws and the defendants seek $15 million in
damages, trebled, plus punitive damages and attorneys’ fees. The Com-
pany believes these counterclaims are without merit. The litigation is
currently in the discovery stage.

From time to time the Company is subject to other claims and lit-
igation arising in the ordinary course of business. Although the final
outcome of any legal proceeding cannot be predicted with certainty,
the Company does not expect disposition of these matters to have a
materially adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results
of operations or cash flows.

mum annual requirements. NW Natural also has a contract commit-
ment to purchase about $10.1 million in gas transmission pipe in
2003 for use in constructing an extension of the pipeline from its
Mist storage field. 
Environmental Matters

NW Natural owns property in Multnomah County, Oregon that is
the site of a former gas manufacturing plant that was closed in 1956
(the Gasco site). The Gasco site has been under investigation by NW
Natural for environmental contamination under the Oregon Department
of Environmental Quality’s (ODEQ) Voluntary Clean-Up Program.
NW Natural has recorded liabilities totaling $4.0 million for the esti-
mated costs of investigation and interim remediation at the Gasco
site, including consultants’ fees, ODEQ oversight reimbursement and
legal fees, of which $3.2 million had been spent as of Dec. 31, 2002.
NW Natural previously owned property adjacent to the Gasco site
that now is the location of a manufacturing plant owned by Wacker
Siltronic Corporation (the Wacker site). In 2000, the ODEQ issued an
order requiring Wacker and NW Natural to determine the nature and
extent of releases of hazardous substances to Willamette River sedi-
ments from the Wacker site. NW Natural has completed the majori-
ty of the studies required under the ODEQ work plan and the agency
is reviewing data generated by the studies. NW Natural has recorded
a liability of $0.3 million for its estimated costs of the investigation
and initial remediation on the Wacker site, of which $0.2 million had
been spent as of Dec. 31, 2002.

In 1998, the ODEQ and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) completed a study of sediments in a 5.5-mile segment of the
Willamette River (the Portland Harbor) that includes the area adjacent
to the Gasco site and the Wacker site. In 2000, the EPA listed the
Portland Harbor as a Superfund site and notified the Company that it
is a potentially responsible party. NW Natural recorded liabilities
totaling $2.3 million between 2000 and 2002, of which $1.1 million
had been spent as of Dec. 31, 2002. The amount of NW Natural’s lia-
bility is based on estimates of the Company’s share of the lower end
of a range of probable liability for the costs of the Remedial Investi-
gation/Feasibility Study for the Portland Harbor. Available informa-
tion is insufficient to determine either the total amount of liability
for investigation and remediation of the Portland Harbor or the high-
er end of a range for NW Natural’s estimated share of that liability.
The City of Portland has notified NW Natural that it is planning
a sewer improvement project that would include excavation within
the former site of a gas manufacturing plant (the Portland Gas site)
that was owned and operated by a predecessor of the Company between
1860 and 1913. The preliminary assessment of this site performed by
a consultant for the EPA in 1987 indicated that it could be assumed
that by-product tars may have been disposed of on site. The report con-
cluded, however, that it is likely that waste residues from the plant, if
present on the site, were covered by deep fill during construction of
the nearby seawall bordering the Willamette River and probably have
stabilized due to physical and chemical processes. Neither the City of
Portland nor the ODEQ has notified NW Natural whether a further
investigation or potential remediation might be required on the site in
connection with the sewer project. Available information is insufficient
to determine either the total amount of liability or a probable range,
if any, of potential liability.

N W N A T U R A L

43

COMPARATIVE CONSOLIDATED 
INCOME STATEMENTS

Thousands, except per share amounts (year ended December 31)
Operating revenues:

Gross operating revenues*
Cost of sales*

Net operating revenues*

Operating expenses:

Operations and maintenance
Taxes other than income taxes
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
Loss on cogeneration facility
Total operating expenses

Income from continuing operations

Other income (expense)*
Interest charges – net
Income before income taxes
Income taxes
Net income from continuing operations

Discontinued segment:

Income from discontinued segment – net of tax
Gain on sale of discontinued segment – net of tax

Net income

Redeemable preferred and preference 
stock dividend requirements

Earnings applicable to common stock

Average common shares outstanding
Basic earnings per share of common stock:

From continuing operations
From discontinued segment
From gain on sale of discontinued segment

Total basic earnings per share

Diluted earnings per share of common stock:

From continuing operations
From discontinued segment
From gain on sale of discontinued segment

Total diluted earnings per share
Dividends per share of common stock

2002

2001

$       641,376 $       650,252 
374,241
___________ ___________
276,011

353,832
287,544

83,920
32,240
49,640
–
___________ ___________
165,800
___________ ___________
110,211

85,120
34,076
52,090
–
171,286
116,258

1,334
33,805
___________ ___________
77,740
27,553
___________ ___________
50,187

(14,890)
34,132
67,236
23,444
43,792

–
–
___________ ___________
50,187

–
–
43,792

2,280

2,401
___________ ___________
$         41,512 $         47,786 
___________ ___________
___________ ___________

25,431

25,159

$             1.63 $             1.90 
–
–
___________ ___________
$             1.63 $             1.90 
___________ ___________
___________ ___________

–
–

–
–

$             1.62 $             1.88 
–
–
___________ ___________
$             1.62 $             1.88 
___________ ___________
___________ ___________
$             1.26 $           1.245 
___________ ___________
___________ ___________

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
*Interest on deferred regulatory accounts for years prior to 1998 was reclassified from gross operating revenues or cost 
of sales to other income (expense).

UTILITY GAS REVENUES

BY CUSTOMER CLASS

2002

87%

2%

11%

93%

4%

3%

1990

RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL AND 
INDUSTRIAL FIRM
INDUSTRIAL INTERRUPTIBLE
TRANSPORTATION

Revenues from residential, com-
mercial and industrial firm sales 
customers have consistently 
exceeded 87 percent of total gas 
revenues since 1990.

NET INCOME

IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS

$70

$60

$50

$40

$30

$20

$10

92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02

NET INCOME
REDUCTION OF NET INCOME FROM 
INVESTMENT WRITEDOWNS:
– $2.8 million from a loss on Agrico 
Cogeneration Corporation in 1992 

– $10.8 million loss for Financial 

Corporation and $1.7 million loss for 
Canor from asset impairment charges 
in 1998

– $8.4 million loss from PGE acquisition 

costs in 2002

The Company earned $43.8 million 
in net income in 2002. Net income, 
excluding the loss provision for 
PGE acquisition costs, would have 
been $52.2 million.

44

N W N A T U R A L

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

1992

$       532,110  $       455,834  $       404,390  $       351,709  $       370,826  $       355,627  $       367,861  $       358,452  $       274,397 
101,672
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
172,725

138,751
219,701

274,160
257,950

173,424
230,966

212,197
243,637

130,599
221,110

142,025
213,602

141,842
228,984

162,199
205,662

64,249
20,865
33,035
4,575
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
122,724
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
50,001

70,723
25,561
39,683
–
135,967
83,734

70,881
24,263
38,058
–
133,202
72,460

77,817
28,351
47,440
–
153,608
104,342

73,209
24,652
51,008
–
148,869
94,768

78,226
21,939
43,937
–
144,102
86,864

76,204
21,597
37,971
–
135,772
93,212

72,018
24,181
40,594
–
136,793
76,809

73,864
19,952
39,051
–
132,867
88,243

(542)
26,733
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
22,726
6,951
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
15,775

(13,723)
31,586
41,555
14,604
26,951

8,393
24,919
55,934
20,473
35,461

1,116
25,107
59,743
22,096
37,647

6,891
26,711
73,392
27,118
46,274

4,138
28,469
63,912
21,034
42,878

9,055
25,679
60,185
22,120
38,065

3,860
33,561
74,641
26,829
47,812

4,816
30,052
69,532
24,591
44,941

–
–
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
15,775

350
–
27,301

181
–
43,059

–
–
37,647

–
–
38,065

–
2,412
50,224

355
–
45,296

–
–
35,461

519
–
46,793

2,456

2,560
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
$        47,768  $         42,781  $         24,724  $         40,413  $         44,070  $         35,259  $         32,478  $         34 ,159  $         13,215
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________

2,723

2,515

3,488

2,646

2,577

2,806

2,983

25,183

24,976

24,233

22,698

22,391

21,817

19,943

19,611

17,864

$             1.80  $             1.70  $             1.01  $             1.77  $             1.95  $             1.62  $             1.63  $             1.74  $             0.74
–
–
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
$             1.90  $             1.71  $             1.02  $             1.78  $             1.97  $             1.62  $             1.63  $             1.74  $             0.74
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________

0.01
–

0.01
–

0.01
–

0.02
–

–
0.10

–
–

–
–

–
–

–
0.09

$             1.79  $             1.69  $             1.01  $             1.75  $             1.92  $             1.60  $             1.61  $             1.72  $             0.74
–
–
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
$             1.88  $             1.70  $             1.02  $             1.76  $             1.94  $             1.60  $             1.61  $             1.72  $             0.74
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
$             1.24  $           1.225  $             1.22  $           1.205  $             1.20  $             1.18  $           1.1 73  $        1.167  $           1.147 
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________

0.01
–

0.01
–

0.01
–

0.02
–

–
–

–
–

–
–

N W N A T U R A L

45

COMPARATIVE CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS

Thousands of dollars (December 31)
Assets:
Plant and property:

Utility plant
Less accumulated depreciation

Utility plant – net
Non-utility property
Less accumulated depreciation and depletion

Non-utility property – net
Total plant and property

Other investments
Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents
Accounts receivable – net
Accrued unbilled revenue
Inventories of gas, materials and supplies
Investment in discontinued segment
Property held for sale
Prepayments and other current assets

Total current assets

Regulatory tax assets
Deferred gas costs receivable
Unrealized loss on non-trading derivatives
Deferred debits and other

Total assets

Capitalization and liabilities:
Capitalization:

Common stock equity
Redeemable preference stock
Redeemable preferred stock

Total capital stock
First mortgage debt
Unsecured debt

Total long-term debt
Total capitalization

Minority interest
Current liabilities:
Notes payable
Accounts payable
Long-term debt due within one year
Taxes accrued
Interest accrued
Other current and accrued liabilities

Total current liabilities
Deferred investment tax credits
Deferred income taxes
Fair value of non-trading derivatives
Deferred gas costs payable
Regulatory liabilities and other

Total capitalization and liabilities

2002

2001

$    1,539,965 $    1,465,079 
514,299
___________ ___________
950,780
___________ ___________
18,203
4,007
___________ ___________
14,196
___________ ___________
964,976
___________ ___________
23,233
___________ ___________

560,798
979,167
20,832
4,404
16,428
995,595
12,703

7,328
46,936
44,069
58,030
–
–
37,645
194,008
47,975
–
–
92,510

10,440
64,722
57,749
49,337
–
–
28,086
___________ ___________
210,334
___________ ___________
48,469
___________ ___________
–
___________ ___________
111,641
___________ ___________
76,369
___________ ___________
$    1,342,791 $    1,435,022 
___________ ___________
___________ ___________

$       483,103 $       468,161 
25,000
9,000
___________ ___________
502,161
___________ ___________
370,000
8,377
___________ ___________
378,377
___________ ___________
880,538
___________ ___________
–

–
8,250
491,353
439,500
6,445
445,945
937,298
–

69,802
74,436
20,000
7,822
2,902
30,045
205,007
7,824
141,732
–
10,635
40,295

108,291
70,698
40,000
22,539
3,658
28,396
___________ ___________
273,582
___________ ___________
8,682
___________ ___________
130,424
___________ ___________
111,868
___________ ___________
10,089
___________ ___________
19,839
___________ ___________
$    1,342,791 $    1,435,022 
___________ ___________
___________ ___________

*Deferred gas costs were included in deferred debits or regulatory accounts prior to 1995.

NET UTILITY PLANT

IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS

$1,100

$1,000

$900

$800

$700

$600

$500

$400

$300

92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02

Utility plant continued to increase in 
2002 as a result of customer growth 
and investments in system improve-
ments and gas storage.

CAPITALIZATION

IN MILLIONS OF DOLLARS

$1050

$900

$750

$600

$450

$300

$150

92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02

COMMON EQUITY
PREFERRED AND PREFERENCE STOCK
LONG-TERM DEBT

In 2002, $32 million in cash divi-
dends were paid to common share-
holders, $25 million in Preference 
Stock was redeemed, $90 million in 
Medium-Term Notes were issued 
and $40.5 million in Medium-Term 
Notes were retired.

46

N W N A T U R A L

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

1992

$    1,406,970  $    1,331,415  $    1,239,690  $    1,164,499  $    1,055,112  $       969,075  $       908,238  $       840,030  $       779,274
233,385
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
545,889
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
44,629
15,480
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
29,149
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
575,038
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
40,336
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________

279,112
629,126
49,586
24,456
25,130
654,256
37,097

255,282
584,748
42,764
20,646
22,118
606,866
34,574

436,386
895,029
8,548
7,654
894
895,923
16,557

478,138
928,832
8,649
3,451
5,198
934,030
14,526

404,117
835,573
89,050
29,927
59,123
894,696
16,714

308,702
660,373
53,807
16,997
36,810
697,183
37,882

366,607
797,892
52,422
22,843
29,579
827,471
35,126

336,141
718,971
45,689
19,388
26,301
745,272
34,723

11,283
60,753
45,619
46,883
–
–
22,834
187,372
49,515
16,973
–
76,297

7,537
33,008
20,738
15,797
–
–
8,220
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
85,300
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
–
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
*
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
–
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
31,160
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
$    1,278,713  $    1,244,423  $    1,191,736  $    1,111,617  $       988,869  $       929,277  $       889,304  $       849,036  $       731,834
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________

7,383
47,476
34,258
21,258
–
–
16,105
126,480
56,860
27,795
–
69,191

4,198
43,972
25,890
16,838
–
–
16,412
107,310
62,130
*
–
38,156

6,731
39,420
23,911
17,385
–
–
17,226
104,673
56,860
28,628
–
58,859

10,013
43,349
31,550
33,919
29,163
16,712
18,349
183,055
51,060
20,950
–
76,878

8,068
42,152
20,320
14,958
–
–
10,041
95,539
60,430
*
–
41,982

7,782
34,385
21,493
14,254
–
–
12,396
90,310
60,430
–
–
43,472

8,219
40,833
22,340
14,439
–
–
12,483
98,314
57,940
–
–
52,620

$       452,309  $       429,596  $       412,404  $       366,265  $       346,778  $       323,552  $       274,408  $       258,565   $       241,538
26,766
28,218
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
296,522
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
205,458
48,308
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
253,766
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
550,288
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
–

26,252
15,950
316,610
234,000
57,076
291,076
607,686
–

26,633
17,041
302,239
215,000
57,931
272,931
575,170
–

25,000
9,750
487,059
382,000
18,790
400,790
887,849
–

25,000
10,564
465,160
377,000
19,379
396,379
861,539
–

25,000
11,499
448,903
347,000
19,738
366,738
815,641
16,322

25,000
13,749
385,527
236,000
35,838
271,838
657,365
–

25,000
14,840
363,392
238,000
41,945
279,945
643,337
–

25,000
12,429
403,694
324,000
20,303
344,303
747,997
–

56,263
110,698
20,000
8,066
2,696
23,638
221,361
9,538
141,656
–
–
18,309

47,109
40,282
2,138
4,790
6,792
9,387
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
110,498
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
15,603
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
34,929
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
–
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
*
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
20,516
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
$    1,278,713  $    1,244,423  $    1,191,736  $    1,111,617  $       988,869  $       929,277  $       889,304  $       849,036  $       731,834
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________

72,548
44,318
–
6,757
4,438
10,180
138,241
14,567
104,300
–
*
16,758

53,654
48,517
1,000
6,584
4,570
11,757
126,082
13,530
112,433
–
*
29,573

94,149
68,163
10,000
4,101
4,673
39,153
220,239
10,393
136,150
–
–
16,102

87,264
56,039
10,000
7,486
6,204
23,477
190,470
11,248
140,310
–
–
17,745

50,058
64,795
26,000
3,196
5,396
19,418
168,863
11,668
123,625
–
8,058
19,290

28,832
41,784
21,000
10,281
4,617
13,204
119,718
12,493
118,692
–
19,914
15,123

89,317
58,775
16,000
4,656
6,058
21,390
196,196
11,949
139,953
–
–
15,522

N W N A T U R A L

47

COMPARATIVE FINANCIAL 
STATISTICS

EARNINGS PER SHARE

IN DOLLARS

Common stock

Ratios – year-end:

Price/earnings ratio
Dividend yield at year-end rate – %
Dividend payout – %
Return on average common equity – %

Per share data – ($):
Basic earnings
Diluted earnings
Dividends paid
Dividend rate at year-end
Book value at year-end
Market price:

High
Low
Year-end
Average

Number of shares of common stock 
outstanding (000):
Year-end
Average

Coverage data – times earned

Fixed charges – Securities and 
Exchange Commission
Fixed charges – Standard & Poor’s

Utility plant

Capital expenditures (000)
Depreciation – % of average 
depreciable utility plant
Accumulated depreciation – % of 
depreciable utility plant

Capital structure – year-end (%)
(Exclusive of current portion of long-term debt)

First mortgage debt
Unsecured debt

Total long-term debt
Redeemable preferred stock
Redeemable preference stock
Common stock equity
Total capital stock

Total capital structure

Effective tax rate

Effective tax rate – % of pretax income

2002

2001

16.6*
4.7
77.3*
8.7*

1.63*
1.62*
1.26
1.26
18.88*

30.70
23.46
27.06
27.577

25,586
25,431

13.4
4.9
65.5
10.4

1.90
1.88
1.245
1.26
18.56

26.69
21.65
25.50
23.666

25,228
25,159

2.85*
3.29

3.14
3.30

$         79,530 $         71,943 

3.5

37.3

3.5

35.8

42.0
1.0
___________ ___________
43.0
___________ ___________
1.0
2.8
53.2
___________ ___________
57.0
___________ ___________
100.0
___________ ___________
___________ ___________

46.9
0.7
47.6
0.9
–
51.5
52.4
100.0

35

35

*Includes loss of $0.16 per share in 1992 on Agrico Cogeneration Corporation, losses of $0.50 per share in 1998 
due to asset write-downs for Financial Corporation and Canor, and loss of $0.33 per share in 2002 for PGE 
acquisition costs.

$2.00

$1.75

$1.50

$1.25

$1.00

$0.75

$0.50

$0.25

92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
REDUCTION IN EARNINGS PER SHARE 
FROM INVESTMENT WRITEDOWNS:
– 16 cents per share in 1992 from a loss 
on Agrico Cogeneration Corporation
– 50 cents per share in 1998 due to 

asset impairment charges

– 33 cents per share in 2002 due to a 

loss provision for PGE acquisition costs

Diluted earnings were $1.62 per 
share in 2002. Results include a 
33 cent per share loss provision 
for PGE acquisition costs.

YEAR-END MARKET PRICE
& BOOK VALUE PER SHARE

IN DOLLARS

$35

$30

$25

$20

$15

$10

92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02

BOOK VALUE PER SHARE
EXCESS OF MARKET PRICE OVER BOOK 
VALUE PER SHARE

The year-end market-to-book ratio 
averaged 1.53x over the past 10 
years. Total return to shareholders 
from dividends paid and market 
appreciation averaged 9.0 percent 
per year for this period.

48

N W N A T U R A L

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

1992

13.9
4.7
65.3
10.8

1.90
1.88
1.240
1.24
17.93

27.50
17.75
26.50
22.147

25,233
25,183

12.9
5.6
71.6
10.2

1.71
1.70
1.225
1.24
17.12

27.875
19.50
21.938
24.629

25,092
24,976

25.4*
4.7
119.6*
6.4*

1.02*
1.02*
1.22
1.22
16.59*

30.75
24.25
25.875
27.248

24,853
24,233

17.4
3.9
67.7
11.3

1.78
1.76
1.205
1.22
16.02

31.25
23.125
31.00
25.292

22,864
22,698

12.2
5.0
60.9
13.0

1.97
1.94
1.20
1.20
15.37

25.75
20.833
24.00
23.054

22,555
22,391

13.6
5.5
73.1
11.8

1.62
1.60
1.18
1.20
14.55

22.667
18.667
22.00
20.75

22,243
21,817

12.1
6.0
72.1
12.2

1.63
1.61
1.173
1.173
13.63

24.333
19.00
19.667
21.25

20,129
19,943

13.1
5.1
67.0
13.7

1.74
1.72
1.167
1.173
13.08

25.333
19.00
22.833
22.167

19,766
19,611

25.7*
6.0
155.0*
5.8*

0.74*
0.74*
1.147
1.147
12.41*

22.50
17.667
19.00
20.00

19,460
17,864

3.14
3.16

3.12
3.19

2.20*
2.72

2.99
3.05

3.53
3.71

3.15
2.87

3.08
2.98

3.22
3.47

1.81*
2.08

$         80,444  $       109,144  $         80,022  $       115,886  $         83,400  $         67,163  $         77,668  $          70,404  $         60,709

3.5

34.9

4.0

33.4

3.9

33.2

3.8

32.6

3.8

33.2

4.2

32.8

4.1

31.7

4.1

31.1

4.0

30.4

37.3
8.8
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
46.1
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
5.1
4.9
43.9
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
53.9
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
100.0
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________

37.4
10.1
47.5
3.0
4.6
44.9
52.5
100.0

43.6
2.3
45.9
1.2
2.9
50.0
54.1
100.0

44.1
1.0
45.1
1.1
2.8
51.0
54.9
100.0

42.6
2.4
45.0
1.4
3.1
50.5
55.0
100.0

43.3
2.7
46.0
1.7
3.3
49.0
54.0
100.0

37.0
6.5
43.5
2.3
3.9
50.3
56.5
100.0

38.5
9.4
47.9
2.6
4.3
45.2
52.1
100.0

35.9
5.5
41.4
2.1
3.8
52.7
58.6
100.0

36

35

35

33

37

37

37

37

31

N W N A T U R A L

49

COMPARATIVE OPERATING
STATISTICS

Selected utility data
Customers at year-end

Residential 
Commercial
Industrial firm
Industrial interruptible
Total sales customers
Transportation customers

Total customers

Gas sales and transportation deliveries (000 therms)

Residential
Commercial
Industrial firm
Industrial interruptible

Total gas sales

Transportation
Unbilled therms

Total volumes delivered

Operating revenues and cost of sales (000)

Sales revenues:
Residential
Commercial
Industrial firm
Industrial interruptible

Total gas sales revenues

Transportation
Unbilled revenues
Other

Total utility operating revenues

Cost of gas

Net utility operating revenues
Non-utility net operating revenues 

Net operating revenues 

Customer data

Heat requirements:

Actual degree days
20-year average degree days

Average use per customer in therms:

Residential
Commercial

Average rate per therm (cents):

Residential
Commercial
Industrial firm
Industrial interruptible
Total sales

Gas purchases (000 therms)
Gas purchased cost per therm – net (cents)
Average sendout cost of gas (cents)
Maximum day firm sendout (000 therms)
Maximum day total sendout (000 therms)

Payroll (000)
Operating
Construction and other

Total

Utility employees
Number of customers served by each operating employee

CUSTOMER GROWTH

IN THOUSANDS

30

25

20

15

10

5

92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02

The Company added 19,136 new 
customers in 2002. The customer 
base has grown at a compound 
annual rate of 4.3 percent over the 
past 10 years.

COST OF PURCHASED GAS

IN CENTS PER THERM

$0.55

$0.50

$0.45

$0.40

$0.35

$0.30

$0.25

$0.20

$0.15

$0.10

$0.05

92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02

Cost of purchased gas, including 
demand charges, increased 8 percent 
in 2002 and was 115 percent higher 
than 10 years ago.

HEAT REQUIREMENTS

IN HEATING DEGREE DAYS

4,700

4,500

4,300

4,100

3,900

3,700

3,500

92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02

DEGREE DAYS
20-YEAR AVERAGE DEGREE DAYS

Weather conditions in NW Natural’s 
service area were about average in 
2002 but were considerably warmer 
than average in five of the previous 
10 years.

50

N W N A T U R A L

2002

2001

485,207
55,096
383
148
___________ ___________
540,834
97
___________ ___________
540,931
___________ ___________
___________ ___________

503,402
56,087
306
31
559,826
241
560,067

350,065
242,293
79,778
63,597
___________ ___________
735,733
385,783
1,771
___________ ___________
1,123,287
___________ ___________
___________ ___________

357,091
240,155
63,215
26,241
686,702
445,999
(6,617)
1,126,084

$       354,735 $       329,905 
190,236
49,662
34,283
___________ ___________
604,086
20,637
13,774
(2,325)
___________ ___________
636,172
364,699
___________ ___________
271,473
4,538
___________ ___________
$       279,414 $       276,011 
___________ ___________
___________ ___________

201,475
42,965
15,937
615,112
26,020
(12,702)
4,018
632,448
353,034
279,414
–

4,232
4,216

725
4,334

99.3
83.9
68.0
61.7
89.6

708,796
51.07
51.91
4,278
6,172

4,325
4,202

738
4,435

94.2
78.5
62.2
54.0
82.1

739,620
47.19
49.45
4,247
5,996

26,044

$         42,168 $         40,856
25,626
___________ ___________
$         68,212 $         66,482
___________ ___________
___________ ___________
1,284
671

1,261
714

2000

1999

1998

1997

1996

1995

1994

1993

1992

311,216
41,156
381
90
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
352,843
135
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
352,978
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________

407,061
50,315
403
122
457,901
120
458,021

346,950
44,078
401
142
391,571
67
391,638

329,157
42,657
396
153
372,363
64
372,427

447,659
52,870
388
115
501,032
131
501,163

468,087
54,684
384
126
523,281
125
523,406

425,606
51,159
411
108
477,284
123
477,407

385,213
47,309
407
119
433,048
121
433,169

363,903
45,402
410
143
409,858
91
409,949

206,131
169,406
67,847
22,399
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
465,783
595,397
4,163
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
1,065,343
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________

352,969
252,382
84,630
52,938
742,919
480,570
(9,343)
1,214,146

267,818
209,642
80,588
66,370
624,418
415,367
3,844
1,043,629

306,310
225,115
91,122
63,261
685,808
410,062
3,759
1,099,629

315,686
229,124
87,275
51,521
683,606
446,165
8,645
1,138,416

256,462
196,723
82,958
84,173
620,316
379,116
4,946
1,004,378

306,356
225,249
84,523
53,929
670,057
440,452
3,615
1,114,124

356,375
250,380
76,559
56,632
739,946
431,136
8,691
1,179,773

260,218
201,925
81,348
89,899
633,390
364,461
(7,519)
990,332

$       280,642  $       242,952  $       205,388  $       177,835  $       183,802  $       165,662  $       176,510  $       168,217  $        124,834
78,614
24,867
6,920
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
235,235
25,564
2,603
2,812
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
266,214
101,489
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
164,725
8,000
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
$       257,950  $       243,637  $       230,966  $       221,110  $       228,984  $      213,602  $       205,662  $       219,701  $       172,725
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________

108,452
34,443
27,361
346,766
14,702
(5,571)
429
356,326
162,437
193,889
11,773

159,660
37,378
23,483
501,163
21,491
12,661
(3,976)
531,339
273,978
257,361
589

139,425
35,857
17,182
435,416
21,351
(2,671)
1,194
455,290
212,021
243,269
368

103,476
31,340
18,884
321,917
17,892
5,153
2,625
347,587
138,751
208,836
10,865

117,889
34,303
15,337
372,917
19,958
8,314
2,617
403,806
173,242
230,564
402

100,677
27,025
13,944
319,481
22,029
1,647
7,884
351,041
130,381
220,660
450

99,079
31,268
24,113
320,122
16,650
1,173
9,411
347,356
142,025
205,331
8,271

104,582
30,672
17,097
336,153
22,533
1,627
9,824
370,137
141,789
228,348
636

4,418
4,197

781
4,670

78.7
63.8
48.8
41.5
67.7

745,582
37.68
36.60
4,071
5,759

4,256
4,193

810
4,851

68.8
55.2
42.4
32.5
58.6

773,258
27.85
28.90
4,170
6,211

4,011
4,234

749
4,540

65.1
51.5
39.3
29.6
54.6

712,602
25.09
25.03
6,260
7,526

4,092
4,264

777
4,670

58.0
44.7
32.0
25.9
47.7

702,820
24.05
19.35
4,450
5,746

4,427
4,273

823
4,874

60.0
46.5
33.7
27.0
49.0

692,894
22.25
20.56
6,020
7,446

3,779
4,306

726
4,420

64.6
50.4
37.7
28.6
51.6

640,976
20.67
22.71
4,359
5,701

4,020
4,324

776
4,680

67.8
53.7
42.3
30.4
54.7

642,607
23.44
25.95
3,913
5,285

4,452
4,313

844
5,029

62.8
49.4
38.9
28.5
51.6

628,172
23.11
22.08
4,047
5,479

3,662
4,354

685
4,214

60.6
46.4
36.7
30.9
50.5

455,343
23.76
21.60
3,432
5,300

24,756

$         38,979 $         38,066  $         37,573  $         35,669  $         34,037  $         33,669  $         33,888  $          33,539  $         30,398
19,802
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
$         63,735 $         62,388  $         62,198  $         60,299  $         56,957  $         55,743  $         54,683  $          54,595  $         50,200
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________ ___________
1,328
437

1,275
643

1,293
469

1,315
646

1,303
611

1,337
583

1,288
533

1,338
478

1,304
560

21,056

20,795

24,625

22,920

24,630

24,322

22,074

N W N A T U R A L

51

CORPORATE OFFICERS

The officers of NW Natural gather in front of Pearl Court Apartments, a gas-heated complex of affordable multifamily housing
in Portland’s fast-growing Pearl District. From left to right in foreground are Bruce DeBolt, Dick Reiten, C.J. Rue, Mark Dodson
and Mike McCoy. In background are (left to right) Lea Anne Doolittle, Gregg Kantor and Steve Feltz. Not pictured are Richelle
Luther and Beth Ugoretz.

52

Bruce R. DeBolt, 55 [1980]
Senior Vice President, Finance,
and Chief Financial Officer (1990- )
Senior Vice President, Finance and
Administration and General Counsel
(1987-1990)
Vice President and General Counsel
(1983-1987)

Mark S. Dodson, 58 [1997]
President, Chief Executive Officer (2003- )
President, Chief Operating Officer (2001-
2002)
General Counsel (1997-2002)
Senior Vice President, Public Affairs
(1997-2001)

Richelle T. Luther, 34 [2002]
Assistant Secretary (2002- )
Associate, Stoel Rives LLP (1997-2002)

Michael S. McCoy, 59 [1969]
Executive Vice President, Customer and
Utility Operations (2000- )
Senior Vice President, Customer
and Utility Operations (1999-2000)
Senior Vice President, Customer Services
(1992-1999)

Richard G. Reiten, 63 [1995]
Chairman of the Board (2000- )
Chief Executive Officer (1997-2002)
President (1996-2001)

Lea Anne Doolittle, 47 [2000]
Vice President, Human Resources (2000- )
Director of Compensation, PacifiCorp
(1993-2000)

C. J. Rue, 57 [1974]
Secretary (1982- )
Assistant Treasurer (1987- )

Stephen P. Feltz, 47 [1982]
Treasurer and Controller (1999- )
Assistant Treasurer and Manager,
General Accounting (1996-1999)

Gregg S. Kantor, 45 [1996]
Senior Vice President, Public and
Regulatory Affairs (2003- )
Vice President, Public Affairs
and Communications (1998-2002)
Director, Public Affairs and
Communications (1996-1997)

Beth A. Ugoretz, 47 [2002]
Senior Vice President, General Counsel
(2003- )
Executive Vice President, KinderCare
Learning Centers, Inc. (1997-2000)
Senior Vice President, General Counsel
and Secretary, Red Lion Hotels, Inc.
(1993-1996)

[Date joined NW Natural]

In  June  2002,  NW  Natural  formed  a
cross-functional  task  force  to  review  the
Company’s 1997 Community Relations Plan.
The group was charged with updating the
plan to reflect changing needs and oppor-
tunities in the communities served by NW
Natural. The task force, which included rep-
resentatives from every part of the Company,
developed its recommendations over a six-
month period. Following is the policy state-
ment  that  was  approved  as  part  of  the
updated plan.

Community Involvement Policy

NW  Natural  is  committed  to  being  a
good corporate citizen and to giving back to
the communities that have contributed to its
success for more than 140 years.

Through  its  community  involvement
programs, NW Natural is actively involved
in  working  with  communities,  organiza-
tions and individuals to solve social prob-
lems and improve the quality of life in the
Northwest. The Company fully encourages
and  supports  employee  participation  in
groups and activities that help communities
thrive and grow.

NW Natural also demonstrates philan-
thropic leadership through its charitable
giving program, aimed at organizations and
causes that meet local needs and enhance
livability in the Pacific Northwest.

Employee Volunteerism

NW Natural is actively involved in mak-
ing  a  difference  and  solving  community
problems through a strong, proactive pro-
gram of volunteering. The Company believes
employee  volunteerism  fosters  teamwork,
helps develop new skills and promotes civic
responsibility — to the advantage of the in-
dividual, the Company and the community.

Approved by Public Affairs Committee,
NW Natural Board of Directors
December 2002

53

BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Richard G. Reiten, 63
Chairman of the Board
NW Natural
Portland, Oregon
[1996]

Robert L. Ridgley, 69
Retired Chairman of the Board
NW Natural
Vancouver, Washington
[1984] (4) (5) (6)

Dwight A. Sangrey, 62
Business Development Consultant
(Information technology, engineering and
health care)
Portland, Oregon
[1992] (2) (4) (5)

Melody C. Teppola, 60
Managing Partner
National Builders Hardware Company
(Regional and national distributor of
builders hardware, decorative plumbing
and woodworking machinery)
Portland, Oregon
[1987] (1) (4) (5)

Russell F. Tromley, 63
President and Chief Executive Officer 
Tromley Industrial Holdings, Inc.
(Manufacturer of foundry equipment and
distribution of nonferrous metals)
Tualatin, Oregon
[1994] (1) (2) (3)

Richard L. Woolworth, 61
Chairman and CEO
The Regence Group
(Regional affiliation of health plans)
Portland, Oregon
[2000] (1) (4) (6)

[Year elected to the Board]
(1) Governance Committee
(2) Audit Committee
(3) Organization and Executive Compensation
Committee
(4) Public Affairs Committee
(5) Environmental Policy Committee
(6) Finance Committee

John D. Carter, 57
Principal
Goldschmidt, Imeson, Carter
(Strategic planning and public affairs 
consulting)
Portland, Oregon
[2002] (2) (6)

Thomas E. Dewey, Jr., 70
Member 
McFarland Dewey & Co., LLC
(Investment banking firm)
New York, N.Y.
[1986] (2) (6)

Mark S. Dodson, 58
President and Chief Executive Officer
NW Natural
Portland, Oregon
[2003]

C. Scott Gibson, 50
President
Gibson Enterprises
(Venture capital firm)
Lake Oswego, Oregon
[2002] (3) (4) (5)

Tod R. Hamachek, 57
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Penwest Pharmaceuticals Company
(Development of pharmaceutical drug
delivery products and technologies)
Patterson, New York
[1986] (1) (2) (3)

Wayne D. Kuni, 72
Chairman
Kuni Enterprises
(Automobile dealerships)
Beaverton, Oregon
[1980] (1) (2) (3)

Randall C. Papé, 52
President and Chief Executive Officer
The Papé Group, Inc.
(Sales and service of capital equipment)
Eugene, Oregon
[1996] (1) (3) (6)

54

Corporate Profile

Financial Briefs

2002

2001

Percent
increase
(decrease)

Corporate Information

NW Natural is a 144-year-old natural gas

local distribution company headquartered

in  Portland,  Oregon.  For  more  than  a

decade, it has grown at two to three times

the national average for natural gas LDCs.

The  Company  serves  more  than

560,000 customers in northwest Oregon

and southwest Washington, including the

Portland-Vancouver metropolitan area,

the Willamette Valley, the northern Oregon

coast and the Columbia River Gorge. More

than 200,000 customers have been added

to NW Natural’s distribution system in the

past 10 years.

In keeping with its steady growth, the

Company has increased annual dividends

paid to shareholders every year for 47

consecutive years.

NW Natural purchases natural gas for

its core market from a variety of suppliers

in the western United States and Canada.

In addition, the Company operates an un-

derground gas storage facility in Columbia

County, Oregon, and leases additional gas

storage outside its service area. NW Natural

also operates two liquefied natural gas

plants in its service area.

Astoria

Mist

Vancouver

Portland

Molalla

The Dalles

Salem

Lincoln
City

Newport

Eugene

Coos Bay

Albany

Legend

Williams Northwest 
Pipeline
NW Natural gas
transmission line
Kelso Beaver (KB) Pipeline
Proposed pipelines to
Molalla and Coos Bay
Service territory
LNG plant
District offices
Mist underground
storage
Propane system

Earnings
Financial facts ($000):

Net operating revenues
Net income
Earnings applicable to common stock

287,544
43,792
41,512

276,011
50,187
47,786

Financial ratios (%):

Return on average common equity
Capital structure at year-end
Long-term debt
Preferred and preference stock
Common stock equity

Common stock
Shareholder data:

Common shareholders
Average shares outstanding (000)

Per share data ($):
Basic earnings
Diluted earnings
Dividends paid on common stock
Book value at year-end
Market value at year-end

Operating highlights

8.7

47.6
0.9
51.5

10,026
25,431

1.63
1.62
1.260
18.88
27.06

10.4

43.0
3.8
53.2

10,359
25,159

1.90
1.88
1.245
18.56
25.50

Gas sales and transportation deliveries 
(000 therms):
Degree days (20-year average, 4,216)
Customers at year-end
Number of utility employees

1,126,084
4,232
560,067
1,261

1,123,287
4,325
540,931
1,284

4
(13)
(13)

(16)

11
(76)
(3)

(3)
1

(14)
(14)
1
1
6

0
(2)
4
(2)

Dividends paid on common stock
Payment date (per share)

February 15
May 15
August 15
November 15

Total dividends paid

DIVIDENDS PAID
PER SHARE

IN DOLLARS

$1.27

$1.26

$1.25

$1.24

$1.23

$1.22

$1.21

$1.20

$1.19

$1.18

$1.17

2002

2001

$       0.315
0.315
0.315
0.315
_________
$       1.260
_________
_________

$       0.310
0.310
0.310
0.315
_________
$       1.245
_________
_________

EARNINGS PER SHARE

IN DOLLARS

$2.00

$1.75

$1.50

$1.25

$1.00

$0.75

$0.50

$0.25

02

99

98

97

00

01
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE
REDUCTION IN EARNINGS PER SHARE 
FROM INVESTMENT WRITEDOWNS:
– 50 cents per share in 1998 due to 

97

98

99

00

01

02

Annual dividends paid per share 
in 2002 increased for the 47th 
consecutive year, a growth record 
matched by few companies.

asset impairment charges

– 33 cents per share in 2002 due to a 

loss provision for PGE acquisition costs

Diluted earnings were $1.62 per 
share in 2002. Results include a 
33 cent per share loss provision 
for PGE acquisition costs.

Notice of Annual Meeting
The 2003 Annual Meeting will be held at 
2 p.m. Thursday, May 22, at the Portland
Hilton Hotel, 921 S.W. Sixth Avenue,
Portland, Oregon. A meeting notice and
proxy statement will be sent to all share-
holders in mid-April.

Form 10-K
The Company will provide its shareholders,
without charge, a copy of the 2002 Annual
Report on Form 10-K to the Securities and
Exchange Commission. Requests should be
made to the Corporate Secretary.

Stock Transfer Agent and Registrar
For all Preferred and Common Stock Issues:
NW Natural
220 N.W. Second Avenue
Portland, Oregon 97209
Attention: Shareholder Services

Trustee, Conversion and Interest 
Paying Agent
For Convertible Debentures:
The Bank of New York
Corporate Debt Operations, Floor 7-E
101 Barclay Street
New York, New York 10286
(800) 548-5075

Trustee and Bond Paying Agent
For all bond issues:
DB Services Tennessee Inc.
Security Holder Relations
P.O. Box 305050
Nashville, Tennessee 37230
(800) 735-7777

Common Stock Prices
The Company’s common stock is listed and
trades on the New York Stock Exchange
using the symbol NWN. The quarterly 
high and low trading range during 2001 
and 2002 was:

2002
Quarter

1
2
3
4

2001
Quarter

1
2
3
4

High

28.50
30.30
30.20
30.70

High

26.69
25.25
25.85
26.30

Low

24.20
27.60
23.46
25.50

Low

23.05
21.65
22.39
22.00

Dividend Reinvestment Plan
Common shareholders of record may 
reinvest all or part of their dividends in 
additional shares under the Company’s plan.
Cash purchases also may be made at the 
current market price under this plan, and 
no brokerage fees will be charged. A
prospectus will be sent to any registered
shareholder on request.

Dividend Payment Dates
February 15, 2003
May 15, 2003
August 15, 2003
November 14, 2003

Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited)

Dollars (thousands except per share amounts)

2002
Operating revenues
Net operating revenues
Net income (loss)
Basic earnings (loss) per share
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
2001
Operating revenues
Net operating revenues
Net income (loss)
Basic earnings (loss) per share
Diluted earnings (loss) per share

——–––––––– Quarter ended ——––––––––
Dec. 31
March 31

Sept. 30

June 30

278,563
110,666
34,447
1.34
1.32

217,341
91,653
25,907
1.00
0.99

101,873
56,564
(2,992)
(0.14)
(0.14)

118,150
54,726
4,865
0.17
0.17

78,717
38,059
(6,008)
(0.26)
(0.26)

78,359
37,067
(4,976)
(0.22)
(0.22)

182,223
82,255
18,345
0.70
0.69

236,402
92,565
24,391
0.94
0.93

Total

641,376
287,544
43,792
1.63*
1.62*

650,252
276,011
50,187
1.90*
1.88*

* Quarterly earnings per share are based upon the average number of common shares outstanding during each quarter. 
Because the average number of shares outstanding has changed in each quarter shown, the sum of quarterly earnings
may not equal earnings per share for the year. Variations in earnings between quarterly periods are due primarily to the
seasonal nature of the Company’s business.

James R. Boehlke
Investor Relations
(503) 721-2451
(800) 422-4012,
Ext. 2451

jrb@nwnatural.com

Linda R. Williams
Shareholder Services
(503) 220-2590
(800) 422-4012,
Ext. 3402

lrw@nwnatural.com

NW Natural
220 N.W. Second Avenue
Portland, Oregon 97209
(503) 226-4211
(800) 422-4012
www.nwnatural.com

Forward-looking statements
The Company’s future operating results will
be affected by various uncertainties and risk
factors, many of which are beyond the
Company’s control, including governmental
policy and regulatory action, the competitive
environment, economic factors and weather
conditions. Some statements in this annual
report may be forward-looking, and actual
results may differ materially as a result of
these uncertainties. For a more complete
description of these uncertainties and risk
factors, please refer to the Company’s filings
with the Securities and Exchange Commis-
sion on Forms 10-K and 10-Q.

n
o
t
a
e
B
e
c
u
r
B
o
t
o
h
P
5
1
P

i

l

e
n
v
e
L
e
r
i
a
C
o
t
o
h
P
2
1
P

n
o
t
a
e
B
e
c
u
r
B

s
r
e
c
i
f
f

O
&
d
r
a
o
B
,
r
e
t
t
e
L

r
e
d
l
o
h
e
r
a
h
S

/
t
i
a
r
t
r
o
P

d
n
a
l
r
o
B
e
i
l
r
a
h
C
y
h
p
a
r
g
o
t
o
h
P
e
r
u
t
a
e
F

l

s
n
o
i
t
u
o
S
c
i
h
p
a
r
G
n
g
i
s
e
D

k
c
o
t
s
d
e
l
c
y
c
e
r
n
o
d
e
t
n
i
r
P

r
e
t
n
e
C
s
t
r
A
c
i
h
p
a
r
G
g
n
i
t
n
i
r
P

n
g
i
s
e
D
n
o
e
h
p
a
r
G
n
o
i
t
c
u
d
o
r
P

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
NW Natural
220 NW Second Avenue
Portland, Oregon 97209
www.nwnatural.com

2002 Annual Report