Quarterlytics / Healthcare / Biotechnology / Novavax, Inc.

Novavax, Inc.

nvax · NASDAQ Healthcare
Claim this profile
Ticker nvax
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Healthcare
Industry Biotechnology
Employees 952
← All annual reports
FY2011 Annual Report · Novavax, Inc.
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
2011Annual Report

PRN_1203043__Novavax_AR2012.indd   1-2

4/18/12   2:34 PM

www.novavax.com

Artists’ rendition of three-dimensional structure of Novavax’s influenza virus-like particle (“VLP”)

Novavax, Inc. (Nasdaq: NVAX) is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company creating novel 

vaccines to address a broad range of infectious diseases worldwide. Using innovative virus-like 

particle (VLP) and recombinant nanoparticle vaccine technology, as well as new and efficient 

manufacturing approaches, the company produces novel vaccine candidates to combat 

diseases, with the goal of allowing countries to better prepare for and more effectively respond 

to rapidly spreading infections. Novavax is committed to using its technology platforms to 

create geographic-specific vaccine solutions and is therefore involved in several international 

partnerships, including collaborations with Cadila Pharmaceuticals of India and LG Life Sciences of 

Korea.  Together, these companies have worldwide commercialization capacity and the global reach 

to create real and lasting change in the biopharmaceutical field.  Additional information about 

Novavax is available on the company’s website: www.novavax.com.

Corporate INformatIoN

Executive Management

Board of Directors

Stanley C. Erck
President and Chief Executive Officer

Gregory M. Glenn, M.D.
Senior Vice President and Chief Medical Officer

Timothy J. Hahn, Ph.D.
Senior Vice President, Manufacturing and  
Process Development

Russell P. Wilson
Senior Vice President, Business Development

Frederick W. Driscoll
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Louis F. Fries III, M.D.
Vice President, Clinical and Medical Affairs

Jane L. Halpern, Ph.D.
Vice President, Regulatory Affairs

Mervyn L. Hamer
Vice President, Manufacturing

John A. Herrmann III, J.D.
Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

Erica S. Shane, Ph.D.
Vice President, Process Development

Gale E. Smith, Ph.D.
Vice President, Vaccine Development

James F. Young, Ph.D.
Chairman of the Board
Former President, Research and Development of  
Medimmune, Inc.

Richard H. Douglas, Ph.D.
Former Senior Vice President, Corporate Development,  
Genzyme Corporation 

Stanley C. Erck
President and Chief Executive Officer of Novavax, Inc.

Gary C. Evans
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Magnum Hunter
Resources Corporation and GreenHunter Energy, Inc.

John O. Marsh, Jr., J.D.
Distinguished Adjunct Professor of Law,
George Mason University, former Secretary of the Army 
and U.S. Congressional Representative

Michael A. McManus, Jr., J.D.
President and Chief Executive Officer of Misonix, Inc.

Rajiv I. Modi, Ph.D.
Managing Director of Cadila Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.

Outside Legal Counsel

Corporate Headquarters

Ropes & Gray LLP, Boston, MA  

Auditors

Grant Thornton LLP, McLean, VA 

Transfer Agent

Computershare, Canton, MA

Safe Harbor Notice

Novavax, Inc.
9920 Belward Campus Drive

Rockville, Maryland 20850

Tel: 240 268 2000

www.novavax.com

NaSDaQ: NVaX

Statements herein relating to the ongoing development of Novavax products, including references to contracts and partnerships, are 

forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Novavax cautions that forward-looking 

statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties, which change over time (“Risk Factors”). Risk Factors that may 

cause actual results to differ materially from the results discussed in any forward-looking statements are discussed in this Annual Report 

and are also contained in Novavax’s filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, available at www.sec.gov.

PRN_1203043__Novavax_AR2012.indd   3-4

4/18/12   2:34 PM

!LipidEnvelopeNeuraminidase(NA)Hemagglutinin(HA)Matrix(M1) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
To Our Stockholders: 

The past year has been transformational for our company, and I am excited to be leading 
Novavax at such a pivotal time in our company’s history. We now have three promising 
vaccine candidates in clinical testing, a new research program in foot-and-mouth disease, 
funding to take our influenza vaccines through late-stage testing and registration, rapidly 
advancing international collaborations in India and Asia and new U.S. manufacturing and 
office facilities to support our expansion and commercial plans. These achievements 
reflect the significant progress we are making to realize the clinical and commercial 
potential of our recombinant-technology vaccine platform. 

We are continuing to develop our seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccine programs and 
are now in the second year of our five-year $179 million contract with the U.S. 
Department of Health and Human Services’ Biomedical Advanced Research and 
Development Authority (HHS BARDA).  The $97 million budget for the first three years 
of the HHS BARDA contract is supporting ongoing clinical development and production 
scale-up of both seasonal and pandemic vaccine candidates. In 2011, we recognized 
revenue of approximately $15 million associated with completion of detailed 
manufacturing and clinical development plans, as well as preparation for Phase I testing 
of our pandemic influenza vaccine and Phase II dose-ranging testing of our seasonal 
influenza vaccine this year. 

We expanded our product portfolio last year with the launch of Phase I clinical testing of 
a new vaccine candidate to prevent respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), the most common 
cause of hospitalization of children worldwide, and a major cause of respiratory disease 
in the elderly. There are currently no vaccines available to prevent the spread of this 
disease. We tested our vaccine in 150 healthy adults in a blinded, placebo-controlled, 
escalating-dose study and presented interim top-line data from our trial in October 2011 
at the 5th Vaccine and ISV Annual Global Conference. The positive results were 
consistent with pre-clinical studies and showed that our RSV vaccine candidate was well-
tolerated, highly immunogenic and produced functional antibodies that neutralized RSV 
with no systemic side effects. We are very encouraged by these findings and are 
preparing to initiate Phase II clinical testing in 2012. Our RSV vaccine program is a 
significant new development for Novavax. We believe that our vaccine candidate 
represents a breakthrough in an industry-wide and decades-long search for a vaccine for 
this disease. We also believe that the market for a successful vaccine could exceed $5 
billion worldwide. 

Last year, we received a new $1.3 million contract from the U.S. Department of 
Homeland Security to develop a VLP vaccine countermeasure against foot-and-mouth 
disease (FMD), a highly contagious viral disease of livestock and a potentially 
devastating threat to U.S. agriculture. We have started using these funds to develop a 
recombinant VLP-based vaccine prototype which, unlike current FMD vaccines, would 
not require the use of infectious FMD virus to be manufactured. This would address a 
major concern of U.S. livestock producers by eliminating the risk of infectious-virus 
release during vaccine production and stockpiling. We believe this contract reflects the 

 
 
 
 
confidence the U.S. government has in our company and its willingness to invest in our 
recombinant-technology vaccine platform.  

Our international partnering initiatives continue to bear fruit. CPL Biologics (CPLB), our 
joint venture in India with Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd., has developed a promising new 
rabies vaccine candidate for which it is now conducting toxicology studies prior to 
initiating human clinical trials. CPLB has also completed validation testing of its new 
manufacturing facility to produce clinical and commercial supplies of influenza and 
rabies vaccine candidates and has made excellent progress with the development of other 
new preclinical stage vaccine candidates. We are optimistic that we will be disclosing 
more about these CPLB activities in the near future. 

In addition to CPLB, we have completed our first year working with LG Life Sciences, 
Ltd. (LGLS) to commercialize our influenza vaccine candidates in Asia. The LGLS 
collaboration exemplifies our strategy of finding partners who have broad 
commercialization capabilities and international reach – LGLS is a leading provider of 
vaccines to supranational health organizations such as UNICEF and the Pan American 
Health Organization. We have granted LGLS an exclusive license to our influenza VLP 
technology in South Korea and a non-exclusive license in the other specified countries, 
for which LGLS has agreed to fund clinical development of Novavax’s influenza VLP 
vaccine candidates in these territories and complete a vaccine-manufacturing facility in 
South Korea.  

Our ongoing commitment to transparency and peer review of our work is reflected in our 
presentations at medical and scientific conferences throughout the year, including the 7th 
World Health Organization Meeting on Evaluation of Pandemic Influenza Vaccines in 
Clinical Trials at which we presented the final positive results of our H1N1 VLP seasonal 
influenza study in Mexico. We also published results from this study in the journal 
Vaccine and the results from our Phase I/IIa pandemic H5N1 influenza study in the 
Journal of Virology. These activities have helped generate greater interest in our 
technology among key medical opinion leaders and potential collaborators. In 2012, we 
presented the results from our RSV clinical study at the XIV International Symposium on 
Respiratory Viral Infections in Istanbul, Turkey. We plan to continue this outreach as we 
advance our vaccine-development programs into later stage clinical trials.  

We substantially improved our financial position last year by reducing our net loss from 
$35.7 million in 2010 to $19.4 million in 2011, a $16.3 million or 46% year-over-year 
reduction. Of course, this reduction was primarily accomplished by the revenue recorded 
under the HHS BARDA contract and further demonstrates the importance of this contract 
to Novavax. 

Our successes in 2011 reflect the accomplishments of a talented team of employees 
including new senior executives in charge of manufacturing, process development, 
medical and regulatory affairs and business development. The breadth and depth of their 
experience are extraordinary: Dr. Tim Hahn, Senior Vice President of Manufacturing and 
Process Development, managed the FluMist® vaccine and Synagis® antibody 
manufacturing programs at MedImmune after 15 years in various manufacturing roles at 

 
 
 
 
 
Merck; Dr. Erica Shane joined us as Vice President of Process Development after 17 
years as head of process development at MedImmune; Merv Hamer, our Vice President 
of Manufacturing, has managed manufacturing and operations at various companies 
including ALZA, PATH and Intercell. Our regulatory affairs team is now run by Dr. Jane 
Halpern, Vice President of Regulatory Affairs, who joined us after 10 years at the FDA’s 
biologics division, CBER, and senior regulatory and quality positions at 
GlaxoSmithKline, ID Biomedical and Genosia. She works closely with our new Vice 
President of Medical Affairs, Dr. Lou Fries, who was previously head of the pandemic 
influenza program at GlaxoSmithKline and head of clinical affairs at ID Biomedical, and 
Dr. Nigel Thomas, Executive Director of Clinical Operations, who is highly experienced 
at managing clinical trials worldwide. Together, they and the rest of my executive team, 
along with all of our Novavax employees, have worked hard to advance our technology, 
pipeline and company.  

In the year ahead, we plan to move our influenza vaccine candidates into Phase II testing, 
advance our RSV vaccine candidate into two Phase II trials, complete our expansion into 
new manufacturing and office facilities in Maryland that will double our production 
capacity and manage our resources so that we may continue to execute our programs 
effectively.  

I congratulate my colleagues on another successful year and thank our collaborators, 
employees and shareholders for your continued commitment and support. Together, we 
are realizing the promise of our recombinant-technology vaccine platform and 
establishing Novavax as a new leader in the prevention of infectious diseases. 

Sincerely, 

Stanley C. Erck 
President and Chief Executive Officer 
Novavax, Inc. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

(cid:2)

□

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011

OR

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from

to

.

Commission File No. 0-26770

NOVAVAX, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

9920 Belward Campus Drive,
Rockville, Maryland 20850
(Address of principal executive offices)

Delaware
(State of incorporation)

22-2816046
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (240) 268-2000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, Par Value $0.01 per share

The NASDAQ Global Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Not Applicable

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes (cid:4) No (cid:2)
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes (cid:4) No (cid:2)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes (cid:2) No (cid:4)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site,

if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes (cid:2) No (cid:4)

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not
be contained, to the best of the Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of
this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. (cid:2)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller
reporting company. See the definitions of ‘‘large accelerated filer,’’ ‘‘accelerated filer’’ and ‘‘smaller reporting company’’ in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer □

Accelerated filer (cid:2)

Non-accelerated filer □
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company □

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes (cid:4) No (cid:2)

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the Registrant (based on the last

reported sale price of Registrants common stock on June 30, 2011 on the NASDAQ Global Market) was $172,600,000.

As of March 8, 2012, there were 121,571,186 shares of the Registrant’s common stock outstanding.

Portions of the Registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed no later than 120 days after the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011

in connection with the Registrant’s 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

Item 1.

BUSINESS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 2.

Item 3.

Item 5.

Item 6.

Item 7.

PROPERTIES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

PART II

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT

MARKET RISK. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 8.

Item 9.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON
ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 9B. OTHER INFORMATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

PART III

Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE . . .

Item 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Item 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Page

1

13

31

31

32

34

35

47

47

47

47

48

49

49

49

49

49

Item 15.

EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

50

When used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, except where the context otherwise requires, the terms

‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ ‘‘our,’’ ‘‘Novavax’’ and ‘‘the Company’’ refer to Novavax, Inc.

PART IV

i

[This page intentionally left blank.] 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
PART I

Item 1. BUSINESS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements, within the meaning of
the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act that involve risks and uncertainties. In some cases, forward-looking
statements are identified by words such as ‘‘believe,’’ ‘‘anticipate,’’ ‘‘intend,’’ ‘‘plan,’’ ‘‘will,’’ ‘‘may’’ and
similar expressions. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak
only as of the date of this report. All of these forward-looking statements are based on information available
to us at this time, and we assume no obligation to update any of these statements. Actual results could differ
from those projected in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including those identified
in the section titled ‘‘Risk Factors,’’ ‘‘Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations’’ and elsewhere. We urge you to review and consider the various disclosures made by us
in this report, and those detailed from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, that attempt to advise you of the risks and factors that may affect our future results.

Overview

Novavax, Inc. (‘‘Novavax,’’ the ‘‘Company,’’ ‘‘we’’ or ‘‘us’’) is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical
company focused on developing novel recombinant vaccines to address a broad range of infectious diseases.
Our goal
is aggressively driving towards development,
licensure and commercialization of important vaccines worldwide.

is to become a profitable vaccine company that

recombinant protein-based vaccines currently marketed and widely-used,

Our technology platform is based on proprietary recombinant vaccine technology that includes virus-like
particles (VLPs) and recombinant nanoparticle vaccines. Our vaccine candidates are genetically engineered
three-dimensional nanostructures, which incorporate immunologically important recombinant proteins. There
are a number of
including
Recombivax(cid:5) HB (Merck) and Engerix(cid:5) (GlaxoSmithKline), which protect against Hepatitis B, Gardasil(cid:5)
(Merck) and Cervarix(cid:5) (GlaxoSmithKline), which protect against human papilloma virus and Provenge(cid:5)
(Dendreon), which treats certain types of prostate cancer. Our product pipeline targets a variety of infectious
diseases and our vaccine candidates are currently in or have completed clinical trials that target pandemic
influenza (H5N1), seasonal influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). Further, CPL Biologics Private
Limited (the JV), our joint venture company in India, is actively developing a rabies vaccine candidate that
was genetically engineered by Novavax. The JV recently completed initial pre-clinical immunogenicity studies
on this new vaccine candidate and is progressing with pre-clinical toxicology studies.

Influenza Vaccines

We have a significant amount of experience in developing recombinant VLP influenza vaccines.

Highlights of our experience include the following:

•

•

•

•

•

•

eight clinical
one currently ongoing seasonal
scheduled to start in the second quarter of 2012;

trials for our seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccine candidates (including
influenza trial) and two imminent pandemic influenza trials

administering our seasonal and pandemic influenza VLPs (nine distinct strains,
including both
influenza A and B and strains of avian and swine origin) to over 4,200 subjects demonstrating
vaccine tolerability and immunogenicity;

five animal toxicology studies without any safety issues;

two ferret
seasonal virus strain, and prevention of clinical signs, weight
pathogenic avian strain;

immunization and challenge studies demonstrating control of viral shedding with a
loss and mortality for a highly

vaccine production under current good manufacturing practices (cGMP) resulting in 45 batches of
VLP vaccine with over a dozen different influenza strains; and

scaled-up vaccine production with our 1,000 liter single-use bioprocessing capacity.

1

We believe our influenza VLP vaccines have potential immunological advantages over currently available
products because our influenza VLPs contain three of the major structural influenza virus proteins, which we
influenza: hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA), both of which
believe are important
stimulate the body to produce antibodies that neutralize the influenza virus and prevent its spread through the
cells in the respiratory tract, and matrix 1 (M1), which stimulates cytotoxic T lymphocytes to kill cells that
may already be infected. Further, our VLPs are not made from a live virus and have no genetic nucleic
material in their inner core, which renders them incapable of replicating and causing disease.

to combat

Novavax’s

insect cell culture based platform production technology, combined with single-use
bioprocessing technology employed strategically throughout the manufacturing process, is a key strength. This
distinctive combination of technology has advantages over traditional vaccine production methods that use
chicken eggs or mammalian cells, including: (1) smaller facility footprint to achieve comparable yields to
traditional egg-based or mammalian cell-based systems, (2) faster facility commissioning, (3) significantly
lower capital expenditures on infrastructure, (4) competitive cost of goods and (5) the potential for advance
seed production, which could provide a shorter lead time to produce vaccine than egg-based technology in the
face of strain changes.

HHS BARDA Contract Award for Recombinant Influenza Vaccines

In February 2011, we were awarded a contract from the Department of Health and Human Services,
Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (HHS BARDA) of the U.S. government valued at
$97 million for the first 36 month base-period, with an HHS BARDA option period of 24 months valued at
$82 million, for a total contract value of up to $179 million. The HHS BARDA contract award provides
significant funding for the continued ongoing clinical development and product scale-up of both our seasonal
and pandemic influenza vaccine candidates. This is a cost-plus-fixed-fee contract in which HHS BARDA will
reimburse us for direct contract costs incurred plus allowable indirect costs and a fee earned in the further
development of our seasonal and pandemic (H5N1) influenza vaccines. During 2011, we recognized revenue
of approximately $15 million, made significant progress in product characterization and production scale-up
and are progressing forward with our multi-year clinical development program.

Pandemic Influenza (H1N1)

Pandemic influenza refers to a situation where there is a significant disease outbreak resulting from an
influenza virus appearing in humans for which the majority have little or no immunity. Pandemic influenzas
are a major concern to world health groups because such diseases can quickly and easily spread worldwide
and can cause serious illness or death before vaccines are available to limit
the spread of the disease.
There have been notorious examples of pandemic influenza crises; in 2009, the World Health Organization
(WHO) declared a pandemic of the H1N1 strain of influenza (this strain has been referred to in the media
as ‘‘swine flu’’).

During 2009 and 2010, we dedicated significant resources to demonstrate our ability to develop a

recombinant VLP vaccine against this latest pandemic influenza strain:

•

•

•

•

three (3) weeks after the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) announced the genetic
sequence of the novel H1N1 virus, we produced a first batch of non-cGMP H1N1 VLP vaccine
candidate that was made available to the CDC for analysis;

eleven (11) weeks after receiving the sequence, we manufactured our H1N1 VLP vaccine candidate
under cGMP;

using this vaccine candidate, we conducted a Phase II clinical trial in Mexico, in collaboration with
Laboratorio Avi-Mex S.A. de C.V. and GE Healthcare (GEHC); and

the World Health Organization (WHO)
final data results, published last year and presented at
Meeting for
the Evaluation of Pandemic Influenza Vaccines in Clinical Trials, showed that
our H1N1 VLP vaccine exceeded the immunogenicity criteria for licensure at all dose levels,
including the lowest 5µg dose and that a single administration of the VLP vaccine induced high
levels of hemagglutinin inhibition (HAI) titers in subjects without pre-existing detectable immunity
to H1N1 influenza.

2

H1N1 influenza is no longer considered a pandemic (WHO categorizes H1N1 as ‘‘post-pandemic’’) and
the strain is being addressed as an active strain in WHO and CDC’s determination of ongoing seasonal
influenza strains. Nevertheless, we expect that the data from our H1N1 clinical trial will be used to support
our active pandemic (H5N1) and seasonal influenza VLP vaccine programs in the U.S. and in other countries.

Pandemic Influenza (H5N1)

The H5N1 strain of influenza has been identified by WHO as having the potential to cause a pandemic
(the H5N1 strain of influenza has commonly been referred to in the media as the ‘‘avian flu’’). Most recently,
the Center for Infectious Disease Research & Policy (CIDRAP) announced that animal health officials in
Nepal reported H5N1 avian influenza outbreaks, while Vietnam and India reported more detection in poultry.
In November 2011, CIDRAP also reported poultry outbreaks in Indonesia and Egypt with human fatal
infections in Bali. According to the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 14 countries
reported H5N1 outbreaks in 2011.

We have made significant progress in the development of our vaccine that targets the H5N1 influenza
strain. In 2007, we released results from an important pre-clinical study in which ferrets that received our
H5N1 vaccine candidate were protected from a lethal challenge of
the H5N1 virus. After filing an
Investigational New Drug (IND) application, we initiated a Phase I/IIa clinical trial. We released interim
human data from the first portion of this clinical trial in December 2007. These interim results demonstrated
that our pandemic influenza vaccine can generate a protective immune response. We conducted the second
portion of the Phase I/IIa trial in 2008 to gather additional subject immunogenicity and safety data and
determine a final dose through the completion of this clinical trial. In August 2008, we reported favorable
results from this clinical trial, which demonstrated strong neutralizing antibody titers across three doses tested.
The vaccine was well-tolerated at all dose levels as compared with placebo, and no serious adverse events
were reported. The vaccine also induced robust HAI responses, which have been shown to be important for
protection against influenza disease. In conjunction with our BARDA contract, in 2012, we expect to launch
two Phase I trials of our H5N1 vaccine candidate in combination with several alternative adjuvant candidates.
These trials will evaluate the safety and tolerability of the vaccines in the presence and absence of adjuvants;
the ability of VLP vaccine antigens with and without adjuvants to generate antibody levels that fulfill the Food
and Drug Administration’s (FDA) criteria for accelerated approval and the ability of these vaccines to provide
an expanded number of doses and possible cross-protection against other virus strains to the U.S. population.

Seasonal Influenza

We are actively developing our VLP vaccine that targets the seasonal influenza virus. In 2008, we
announced positive results from an immunogenicity study in ferrets inoculated with our seasonal influenza
vaccine candidate. Subsequently, we conducted a Phase IIa clinical
to evaluate the safety and
immunogenicity of different doses of our seasonal trivalent (three strain) influenza vaccine candidate. In
December 2008, we announced favorable safety and immunogenicity results from this Phase IIa seasonal trial
in healthy adults (aged between 18 and 49 years) with no vaccine-related serious adverse events reported. In
May 2009, we enrolled subjects in a second Phase II trial in healthy adults using our trivalent seasonal
influenza vaccine candidate. In September 2009, we announced favorable safety and immunogenicity results
from this Phase II trial in healthy adults that supported a Phase II dose-ranging trial in older adults (60 years
of age or older), head-to-head with a marketed trivalent vaccine that we commenced in November 2009.

trial

In April 2010, we reported the final results of our Phase II trial in older adults in a dose-ranging study
comparing our trivalent seasonal influenza VLP vaccine with a commercially available inactivated trivalent
influenza vaccine. The results showed that
the
2009 − 2010 seasonal influenza virus strains in older adults. The CDC has indicated that currently approved
seasonal influenza vaccines may be suboptimally effective in preventing hospitalization for pneumonia and
influenza in older adults; however, we believe that some features of our seasonal influenza VLP vaccine have
the potential to address this unmet medical need.

the vaccine was both safe and immunogenic against

3

In 2012, we initiated a seasonal influenza Phase II dose-ranging trial using both trivalent and quadrivalent
influenza vaccine
(four strain) formulations. We developed a quadrivalent formulation of our seasonal
to quadrivalent formulations, an
candidate as many influenza vaccine manufacturers move from trivalent
industry move that has been acknowledged by WHO and the FDA. At the conclusion of the trial, we will
select the optimal quadrivalent dose and expect to initiate a dose-confirmatory Phase II trial in the second half
of 2012. A Phase III registration trial is expected to begin in late 2013.

Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)

RSV causes infection of the lungs and breathing passages. In adults, RSV generally only produce
cold-like symptoms; however, it is the leading cause of bronchiolitis (inflammation of the small airways) and
pneumonia in infants and children under one year of age. In premature babies and children with diseases that
affect the lungs, heart or immune system, RSV can lead to more serious illnesses. It is a highly contagious
virus that often causes epidemics that last from late fall through early spring in the U.S. and other northern
hemisphere regions. Currently, there is no approved RSV vaccine available.

We have developed a recombinant nanoparticle vaccine for the prevention of RSV. In pre-clinical studies,
we have demonstrated positive results in models designed to test the safety and efficacy of our RSV vaccine
candidate. In February 2009, we announced favorable results from an RSV pre-clinical study performed in
mice against the viral fusion (F) protein, which fuses with cells in the respiratory tract and causes illness.
the viral fusion protein and also protected against
The vaccine induced neutralizing antibodies against
RSV infection. In January 2010, we announced positive pre-clinical results with a recombinant RSV fusion
(F) particle vaccine in cotton rats, which are generally accepted as the best model to evaluate the safety of
candidate RSV vaccines. The RSV F vaccine candidate completely protected the vaccinated animals and there
was no evidence of enhanced disease in the lungs of vaccinated animals following challenge with live RSV,
an effect that was observed in an earlier version of RSV vaccines developed by other companies.

In December 2010, we initiated a blinded, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating Phase I trial to assess the
safety and tolerability of aluminum phosphate-adjuvanted and unadjuvanted formulations of our RSV vaccine
candidate. A secondary objective of the study was to evaluate total and neutralizing anti-RSV antibody
responses and assess the impact of the adjuvant. The study enrolled 150 healthy adults 18 to 49 years old who
were allocated to six cohorts that included four dose levels of vaccine. The primary safety findings were local
pain and tenderness at the site of injection, the majority of which were mild in nature with no dose-related
increase observed. There were no observed vaccine-related serious adverse events or trends for related
systemic side effects. The antibody response to the RSV F protein was significantly increased compared to
placebo (p<0.001) in all groups and increased by 19-fold in the highest-dose group at day 60. A significant
dose-response pattern was observed. High rates of seroconversion were seen at all doses including a rate of
100% at the highest-dose-adjuvant group. In 2012, we expect to initiate two separate dose-ranging Phase II
trials in older adults and women of child bearing age.

Foot-and-Mouth Disease (FMD)

In October 2011, we were awarded a $1.3 million contract with the U.S. Department of Homeland
Security to develop to a VLP vaccine countermeasure to protect the U.S. from FMD, a highly contagious viral
disease of livestock and a potential threat to U.S. agriculture. The Company will use these funds over the next
two and a half years to develop a Novavax recombinant VLP-based vaccine which, unlike current FMD
vaccines, would not require the use of infectious FMD virus to be manufactured. This would address the
potential risk of releasing infectious virus during vaccine production and stockpiling in the U.S. or other
FMD-free countries.

Vaccine Platform Technologies

Currently approved influenza vaccines are typically produced by growing virus in chicken eggs, from
which the virus is extracted and further processed. This 50-year-old egg-based production method requires
four to six months of lead time for production of a new strain of virus and significant
in
fixed production facilities, with production yields that vary from strain to strain. In addition, sometimes
to be produced efficiently in the egg. The
the influenza virus strain must be changed in order for it
vaccine shortage during the 2004 influenza season (caused in part by a contamination issue at a facility in the

investment

4

United Kingdom) highlighted the limitations of current production methods and the need for increased vaccine
manufacturing capacity. It also heightened concerns regarding manufacturers’ capacity to respond to a
pandemic, when the number of vaccine doses required will be higher than the number required for seasonal
influenza vaccines and manufacturing lead times will be even shorter. This concern was borne out again in the
2009 H1N1 pandemic as, even with expedited regulatory approvals for companies that already had approved
vaccines, production of H1N1 vaccines took six months before significant doses were distributed.

Compared with traditional egg-based influenza vaccine production, we believe our processes allow for
faster production of vaccine. Because our process uses genetic information and no viral seed is required, we
can quickly construct clones of the influenza virus as soon as the genetic information is available and without
needing to adjust the strain. This factor alone can shorten the time for creating new vaccine by several weeks
compared to traditional egg-based manufacturing. Importantly, we also believe that a manufacturing facility
that produces our vaccines can be validated in significantly less time than cell-based vaccine manufacturing
facilities. We produce our vaccine candidates using a baculovirus expression system in insect cells with low
cost equipment that can be readily deployed both nationally and internationally. By not requiring significant
production batch sizes, production capacity can be employed quickly. We estimate the time to qualify a
facility that utilizes our processes can be six to nine months faster than a fixed-pipe bioreactor facility used in
cell-based manufacturing.

Virus-Like Particles

Our VLP vaccine technology platform is based on self-assembling protein structures that resemble
viruses. These are non-infectious particles that, for many viral diseases, have been shown in animal studies
and clinical trials to make effective vaccines. VLPs closely mimic natural virus particles with repeating protein
structures that can elicit broad and strong antibody and cellular immune responses, but lack the genetic
is employed in currently
material required for replication. VLP technology is a proven technology that
marketed products such as Merck’s Gardasil(cid:5). Our proprietary VLPs are more advanced than earlier
approaches and they include multiple proteins and lipids and can be tailored to induce robust and broad
immune responses similar to natural infections. Our advanced VLP technology has the potential to develop
vaccines for a wide range of human infectious diseases where there are significant unmet medical needs, some
of which have not been addressed by other technologies. We have used formal criteria based upon medical
need, technical feasibility and commercial value to select vaccine candidates.

immune response. Specifically,

We believe that our influenza vaccines are designed to address many of the significant unmet needs
related to seasonal and pandemic influenza. There are several points of differentiation of our influenza
vaccines when compared to traditional egg-based, or new mammalian-based approaches that form the basis to
address unmet medical needs and capitalize on commercial opportunities. Our influenza VLPs contain
components that provide a broad and robust
the VLPs contain the viral
components HA, NA and M1. Traditional egg-based vaccines contain meaningful levels of HA, but not of NA
or M1. The HA sequence in our VLPs is the same as in the wild-type virus and could prove more effective/
immunogenic than influenza vaccines produced using egg or mammalian cell
lines, which alter HA. In
addition, the NA and M1 in our VLPs may play a role in reducing the severity of the disease by inducing
antibody responses and cell mediated immunity. NA and M1 are both highly conserved, and immunity to these
viral components may help provide additional protection throughout an entire influenza season, even as strains
mutate. Data from our seasonal influenza Phase IIa trial in healthy adults showed that 50 to 73% of the
volunteers immunized with our VLP vaccine had a four-fold increase in the antibody that blocks NA activity.
immunogenicity in
Finally, because of
two vulnerable populations — the pediatric and the elderly.

the VLP structure and components,

they may have greater

Recombinant Nanoparticle Vaccines

Our recombinant nanoparticle vaccine technology is also based on self-assembling protein structures but
differ from traditional VLPs in that these particles do not generally occur in nature and can be made from
proteins from any pathogenic organism including viruses, bacteria, parasites or even cancer cells. Protein
nanoparticles closely resemble the natural structure of surface antigens of disease organisms but lack the
genetic material required for replication and therefore are not infectious. An advantage of this technology is
the formation of nanoparticles is done in vitro or outside of cells thereby making it possible to assemble
nanoparticles from one or more very higher purified proteins. This results in high purity vaccines with certain

5

manufacturing advantages over more traditional products. Potential
immunological advantages of protein
nanoparticle vaccines are presentation of epitopes (antibody binding sites) in a more native configuration for
improved efficacy, efficient recognition by the immune system’s antigen presenting cells (APCs) and triggering
robust immune responses, recognition of the nanoparticle vaccine’s repeating protein patterns by the APCs
Toll-like receptors to stimulate innate immunity and the high purity and lack of synthetic material adds to the
potential safety of recombinant nanoparticle vaccines. Recombinant nanoparticle vaccine technology has
expanded our early-stage vaccines in development to include both virus and non-virus disease targets. Our
most advanced recombinant nanoparticle vaccine candidate is our RSV fusion (F) protein vaccine candidate,
which is manufactured from highly purified F protein.

Competition in Influenza and RSV Vaccines

The biopharmaceutical industry and the vaccine market are intensely competitive and are characterized by
rapid technological progress. Our technology is based upon utilizing the baculovirus expression system in
insect cells to make VLPs and recombinant nanoparticle vaccines. We believe this system offers many
advantages when compared to other technologies and is uniquely suited for developing pandemic and seasonal
influenza vaccines, as well as other infectious diseases, including our vaccine candidate against RSV.

There are a number of companies developing and selling vaccines for seasonal and pandemic influenza
employing historic vaccine technology, as well as new technologies. The table below provides a list of major
vaccine competitors and corresponding influenza vaccine technologies.

Company

Competing Technology Description

sanofi pasteur, Inc.
MedImmune, LLC (a subsidiary of AstraZeneca PLC) Nasal, live attenuated (egg-based)
GlaxoSmithKline plc
Novartis, Inc.
Merck & Co., Inc.

Inactivated (egg-based)
Inactivated sub-unit (cell and egg-based)
Inactivated sub-unit (egg-based)

Inactivated sub-unit (egg-based)

There are many seasonal influenza vaccines currently approved and marketed. Competition in the sale of
these seasonal influenza vaccines is intense. Therefore, newly developed and approved products must be
differentiated from existing vaccines in order to have commercial success. In order to show differentiation in
the seasonal influenza market, a product should be more efficacious, particularly in older adults, and/or be less
expensive and quicker to manufacture. Many of our competitors are working on new products and new
generations of current products, some by adding an adjuvant that is used to increase the efficacy of that
product, each of which is intended to be more efficacious than currently marketed products. We believe that
our seasonal influenza product will be as efficacious or more so than current products or products being
developed by our competitors, and that our manufacturing system provides savings in both time and money;
however, there can be no guarantee that our seasonal influenza vaccine will prove to be efficacious or that our
manufacturing system will prove to be sufficiently differentiated to ensure commercial success.

Unlike influenza, there is no currently approved RSV vaccine for sale in the world; however, a number of
vaccine manufacturers currently have, or have had, programs to develop such a vaccine to prevent disease
caused by RSV. In addition, many other companies are developing products to prevent disease caused by RSV
using a variety of technology platforms, including various virus vector technologies and competitive virus-like
particle technologies. Although early in clinical development, we believe that our RSV vaccine candidate,
which utilizes recombinant F-protein antigens as recombinant nanoparticle vaccines, could be more effective
than RSV vaccine candidates in development by our competitors; however, such efficaciousness cannot be
guaranteed. Although we aren’t aware of all our competitors efforts, we believe that MedImmune, a subsidiary
of AstraZeneca, has the most advanced RSV vaccine program, as it has reported testing in Phase I clinical
trials, an intranasal, recombinant, live attenuated, RSV vaccine for the prevention of lower respiratory tract
disease caused by RSV, as well as a combination intranasal vaccine for the prevention of several infant
respiratory illnesses, including RSV.

6

In general, competition among pharmaceutical products is based in part on product efficacy, safety,
reliability, availability, price and patent position. An important factor is the relative timing of the market
introduction of our products and our competitors’ products. Accordingly, the speed with which we can develop
products, complete the clinical
trials and approval processes and supply commercial quantities of the
products to the market is an important competitive factor. Our competitive position also depends upon our
ability to show differentiation with a product
target
populations and/or be less expensive and quicker to manufacture. It also depends upon our ability to attract
and retain qualified personnel, obtain patent protection or otherwise develop proprietary products or processes
and secure sufficient capital resources for the often substantial period between technological conception and
commercial sale.

is more efficacious, particularly in the relevant

that

Patents and Proprietary Rights

We generally seek patent protection for our technology and product candidates in the U.S. and abroad.
The patent position of biopharmaceutical firms generally is highly uncertain and involves complex legal and
factual questions. Our success will depend, in part, on whether we can:

•

•

•

•

obtain patents to protect our own technologies and products;

obtain licenses to use the technologies of third-parties, which may be protected by patents;

protect our trade secrets and know-how; and

operate without infringing the intellectual property and proprietary rights of others.

Patent rights; licenses. We have intellectual property (patents,

licenses, know-how) related to our
technologies. Currently, we have or have rights to over
vaccines, manufacturing process and other
115 U.S. patents and corresponding foreign patents and patent applications relating to vaccines and biologics.
Our core vaccine-related intellectual property extends beyond the year 2025.

In July 2007, we entered into a non-exclusive license agreement with Wyeth Holdings Corporation, a
subsidiary of Pfizer Inc. (Wyeth), to obtain rights to a family of patent applications covering VLP technology
for use in human vaccines in certain fields.

In July 2010, U.S. Patent No. 7,763,450 for Functional Influenza Virus-Like Particles was issued by the
U.S. Patent & Trademark Office. The patent covers, in part, the use of influenza gene sequences for high-yield
production of consistent influenza VLP vaccines to protect against current and future seasonal and pandemic
strains of influenza viruses. In December 2011, European Patent No. 1644037 was issued by the European
Patent Office covering this technology.

In December 2011, U.S. Patent No. 8,080,255 for Functional Influenza Virus-Like Particles was issued by
the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office. The patent covers, in part, a method of inducing substantial immunity to
an influenza virus infection in a human and administering to the human a VLP comprising M1, HA and NA
proteins. The M1 protein is derived from a particular avian influenza strain, A/Indonesia/5/05.

The Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986 and related statutory guidance encourages
the
dissemination of science and technology innovation. While our recent contract with HHS BARDA provides us
with the right to retain ownership in our inventions that may arise during performance of that contract, with
respect to certain other collaborative research efforts with the U.S. government, certain developments and
results that may have commercial potential are to be freely published, not treated as confidential and we may
be required to negotiate a license to developments and results in order to commercialize products. There can
be no assurance that we will be able to successfully obtain any such license at a reasonable cost, or that such
development and results will not be made available to our competitors on an exclusive or non-exclusive basis.

Trade secrets. To a more limited extent, we rely on trade secret protection and confidentiality
agreements to protect our
is our policy to require employees, consultants, contractors,
manufacturers, collaborators and other advisors to execute confidentiality agreements upon the commencement
of employment, consulting or collaborative relationships with us. We also require confidentiality agreements
from any entity that is to receive confidential information from us. With respect to employees, consultants and

interests.

It

7

contractors, the agreements generally provide that all inventions made by the individual while rendering
services to us shall be assigned to us as our property.

Government Regulations

The development, production and marketing of pharmaceutical and biological products developed by
Novavax or our collaborators are subject
to regulation for safety, efficacy and quality by numerous
governmental authorities in the U.S. and other countries. In the U.S., the development, manufacturing and
marketing of human pharmaceuticals and vaccines are subject to extensive regulation under the Federal Food,
Drug, and Cosmetic Act, and biological products are subject to regulation under provisions of that Act and the
Public Health Service Act. The FDA not only assesses the safety and efficacy of these products but it also
regulates, among other things, the testing, manufacture, labeling, storage, record-keeping, advertising and
promotion of such products. The process of obtaining FDA approval for a new product
is costly and
time-consuming.

Vaccine clinical development follows the same general regulatory pathway as drugs and other biologics.
Before applying for FDA approval to market any new vaccine candidate, we must first submit an IND that
explains to the FDA, among other things, the results of pre-clinical testing conducted in laboratory animals,
the method of manufacture, quality control tests for release and what we propose to do for human testing.
At this stage, the FDA decides whether it is reasonably safe to move forward with testing the vaccine in
humans. We must then conduct Phase I clinical trials and larger-scale Phase II and III clinical trials that
demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our vaccine candidate to the satisfaction of the FDA. Once these trials
are complete, a Biologics License Application (BLA) (the biologic equivalent to a New Drug Application or
NDA) can be filed with the FDA requesting approval of the vaccine for marketing based on the vaccine’s
effectiveness and safety.

During the FDA’s review of a BLA,

the proposed manufacturing facility undergoes a pre-approval
inspection during which the FDA examines in detail the production of the vaccine as it is in progress. Vaccine
approval also requires the provision of adequate product labeling to allow health care providers to understand
the vaccine’s proper use, including its potential benefits and risks, to communicate with patients and parents,
and to safely deliver the vaccine to the public. Until a vaccine is given to the general population, all potential
adverse events cannot be anticipated. Thus, many vaccines are required by the FDA to undergo Phase IV
confirmatory trials after the BLA has been approved and the vaccine is on the market.

The FDA continues to oversee the production of vaccines after the vaccine and the manufacturing
processes are approved, in order to ensure continuing safety. For example, monitoring of the vaccine and of
production activities, including periodic facility inspections, must continue as long as the manufacturer holds
an approved BLA for the product. Manufacturers may also be required to submit to the FDA the results of
their own tests for potency, safety and purity for each vaccine lot, if requested by the FDA. They may also be
required to submit samples of each vaccine lot to the FDA for testing.

In addition to obtaining FDA approval for each product, each domestic manufacturing establishment must
be registered with the FDA, is subject to FDA inspection and must comply with cGMP regulations. To supply
products for use either in the U.S. or outside the U.S., including clinical trials, U.S. and foreign manufacturing
establishments, including third-party facilities, must comply with cGMP regulations and are subject to periodic
inspection by the FDA or by corresponding regulatory agencies in their home country.

The development process for a new drug or biological product, such as a vaccine, typically takes a long
period of time to complete. Pre-clinical studies may take several years to complete and there is no guarantee
that the FDA will permit an IND to become effective and allow the product to advance to clinical testing.
Clinical trials may take several years to complete. After the completion of the required phases of clinical
trials, if the data indicate that the drug or biologic product is safe and effective, a BLA or NDA (depending on
whether the product is a biologic or pharmaceutical product) is filed with the FDA to approve the marketing
and commercial shipment of the drug. This process takes substantial time and effort and the FDA may not
accept the BLA or NDA for filing. Even if filed and accepted, the FDA might not grant approval. FDA
approval of a BLA or NDA may take up to two years and may take longer if substantial questions about the
filing arise. The FDA may require post-marketing testing and surveillance to monitor the safety of the
applicable products.

8

In 1992, the FDA instituted regulations that allow approval of certain products that treat serious or
life-threatening illnesses and provide meaningful
therapeutic benefit over existing treatments based on a
surrogate endpoint, versus a clinical outcome, which can take many more years to demonstrate. Surrogate
endpoints, generally a laboratory measurement or other physical sign, can considerably shorten the time
development time leading up to FDA approval. The FDA bases its decision on whether to accept a proposed
surrogate endpoint on the scientific support for that endpoint. The company developing the product is required
to conduct further studies to verify and describe its clinical benefit in Phase IV confirmatory trials. Based on
commentary from the FDA, we expect
influenza vaccine candidate should qualify for
accelerated approval using surrogate endpoints described in published FDA guidance documents. We would
thus expect to perform Phase IV confirmatory trials that will demonstrate the clinical benefit of our seasonal
influenza vaccine candidate after the BLA is approved. However, there can be no guarantee that the FDA will
grant accelerated approval of our seasonal influenza vaccine candidate.

that our seasonal

In addition to regulatory approvals that must be obtained in the U.S., an investigational product is also
subject to regulatory approval in other countries in which it is intended to be marketed. No such product can
be marketed in a country until
the regulatory authorities of that country have approved an appropriate
marketing application. FDA approval does not assure approval by other regulatory authorities. In addition, in
many countries, the government is involved in the pricing of the product. In such cases, the pricing review
period often begins after market approval is granted.

We are also subject to regulation under the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Environmental
Protection Act, the Toxic Substances Control Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and other
present and potential federal, state or local regulations. These and other laws govern our use, handling and
disposal of various biological and chemical substances used in, and waste generated by our operations. Our
research and development involves the controlled use of hazardous materials, chemicals and viruses. Although
we believe that our safety procedures for handling and disposing of such materials comply with the standards
prescribed by state and federal regulations, the risk of accidental contamination or injury from these materials
cannot be completely eliminated. In the event of such an accident, we could be held liable for any damages
that result and any such liability could exceed our resources. Additionally, for formulations containing
controlled substances, we are subject to Drug Enforcement Act regulations.

There have been a number of federal and state proposals during the last few years regarding the pricing
of pharmaceutical and biological products, government control and other changes to the healthcare system of
the U.S. It is uncertain what legislative proposals will be adopted or what actions federal, state or private
payers for medical goods and services may take in response to any healthcare reform proposals or legislation.
We cannot predict the effect medical or healthcare reforms may have on our business, and no assurance can
be given that any such reforms will not have a material adverse effect.

Manufacturing

We constructed a 10,000 square foot cGMP pilot facility to produce clinical trial material at our current
corporate headquarters in Rockville, MD. Construction for the pilot plant facility commenced in the fourth
quarter of 2007 and was completed within 120 days of ground breaking. The total cost of the project,
including demolition, construction and installation of laboratory and production equipment, was approximately
$5 million. The facility had existing mechanical systems in place that were not included in the total cost.

In November 2011, we announced that we had entered into a long-term lease arrangement to occupy
74,000 square feet of manufacturing, laboratory and office space in two facilities in Gaithersburg, MD. The
main facility, located at 20 Firstfield Road in Gaithersburg, MD, will become the primary commercial-scale
manufacturing facility for production of our vaccines after moderate modifications that are expected to be
completed in 2012. Our corporate offices will relocate to the same campus at 22 Firstfield Road.

We are currently considering our plans for the Rockville, MD facility subsequent to relocation to the
Gaithersburg, MD facilities. These plans may include remarketing the facility through the end of the
remaining lease term of January 31, 2017.

9

Sources of Supply

Most of the raw materials and other supplies required in our business are generally available from
various suppliers in quantities adequate to meet our needs. In some cases, we have only qualified one supplier
for certain of our manufacturing components. Where feasible, we plan to seek qualification of multiple
suppliers for all critical supplies before the time we would put any of our product candidates into commercial
production. Two of our major suppliers are GEHC, which supplies disposable components used in our
manufacturing process, and Xcellerex, Inc., which supplies our single-use bioreactor production system and
related supplies. The vendors that supply our key manufacturing materials are or will be audited for
compliance with cGMP standards based on a schedule of when such materials would be needed during our
own cGMP bioprocessing efforts.

Business Development

We believe our proprietary vaccine technology affords us a range of traditional and non-traditional
commercialization options that are broader than those of existing vaccine companies. We strive to create
sustainable value by working to obtain non-dilutive funding for conducting Phase III trials for both seasonal
and pandemic influenza, to continue development of our vaccine product candidates until such vaccines can be
licensed on a regional basis, to retain commercial rights in major markets and generate product sales revenue
and, in certain markets, to commercialize our products through partners and other strategic relationships.

In addition to our aforementioned contract with HHS BARDA, some examples of our strategic
relationships are our collaboration with GEHC, our joint venture with Cadila Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. and our
licensing agreement with LG Life Sciences, Ltd. (LGLS).

In December 2007, we entered into a co-marketing agreement with GEHC for a pandemic influenza
international countries. The collaboration incorporates GEHC’s bioprocessing/

vaccine solution for select
manufacturing solutions and design expertise with Novavax’s VLP manufacturing platform.

the laws of

India (Cadila), pursuant

In March 2009, we entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd., a private
company incorporated under
to which we and Cadila formed
CPL Biologicals Private Limited, a joint venture (the JV), of which 20% is owned by us and 80% is owned
by Cadila. The JV will develop and manufacture our seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccine candidates and
Cadila’s biogeneric products and other diagnostic products for the territory of India. We also contributed and
plan to contribute to the JV technology for the development of several other VLP vaccine candidates against
diseases of public health concern in the territory. Cadila has committed to contribute approximately $8 million
over three years to support the JV’s operations. The JV is responsible for clinical testing and registration of
the JV opened its newly constructed
products that will be marketed and sold in India. In June 2010,
state-of-the-art manufacturing facility, 100% funded by Cadila, to be used to produce pandemic and seasonal
influenza vaccines.

In February 2011, we entered into a licensing agreement with LGLS that allows LGLS to use our VLP
technology to develop and commercially sell our influenza vaccines in South Korea and certain other
emerging-market countries. LGLS received an exclusive license to our
influenza VLP technology in
South Korea and a non-exclusive license in the other specified countries. At its own cost, LGLS is responsible
for funding its clinical development of the influenza VLP vaccines and completing a manufacturing facility in
South Korea. We received an upfront payment and may receive reimbursements of certain development and
product costs and royalty payments between 10 and 20% from LGLS’s future commercial sales of influenza
VLP vaccines.

Employees

As of March 8, 2012, we had 112 full-time employees, of whom 24 hold M.D. or Ph.D. degrees and
22 of whom hold other advanced degrees. Of our total workforce, 86 are engaged primarily in research,
development and manufacturing activities and 26 are engaged primarily in executive, business development,
finance and accounting and administrative functions. None of our employees are represented by a labor union
or covered by a collective bargaining agreement and we consider our employee relations to be good.

10

Executive Officers

Our executive officers hold office until the first meeting of the Board of Directors following the Annual
Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors are duly chosen and qualified, or until they resign or are
removed from office in accordance with our By-laws.

The following table provides certain information with respect to our executive officers.

Name

Stanley C. Erck

Age

63

Frederick W. Driscoll

61

Gregory Glenn, M.D.

58

Timothy Hahn, Ph.D.

48

Russell P. Wilson

52

Principal Occupation and Other Business Experience During the Past Five Years

President and Chief Executive Officer and Director of Novavax since
April 2011, formerly Executive Chairman since February 2010, and a
Director since June 2009. From 2000 to 2008, Mr. Erck served as President
and Chief Executive Officer of Iomai Corporation, a developer of vaccines
and immune system therapies, which was acquired in 2008 by Intercell
AG. He also previously held leadership positions at Procept, a publicly
traded immunology company, Integrated Genetics, now known as Genzyme
and Baxter International. Mr. Erck also serves on the Board of Directors of
BioCryst Pharmaceuticals, MaxCyte, Inc. and MdBio Foundation.

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Novavax since
August 2009. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Driscoll served as Chief
Executive Officer of Genelabs Technologies, Inc. from September 2008 to
January 2009, as Interim Chief Executive Officer from February 2008 to
August 2008 and as Chief Financial Officer from September 2007 to
from 2000 to 2006, Mr. Driscoll was
February 2008. Prior
employed by OXIGENE, Inc., where he served as President and Chief
Executive Officer from 2002 to 2006.

to that,

Senior Vice President, Chief Medical Officer of Novavax since
January 2011. Senior Vice President and Chief Scientific Officer from
July 2010 to January 2011. Prior to joining the Company, Dr. Glenn was
the Chief Scientific Officer and founder of IOMAI (now Intercell), an
associate in international health at Johns Hopkins University’s School of
Public Health and a clinical and basic research scientist at Walter Reed
Army Institute of Research.

Senior Vice President, Manufacturing and Process Development of
Novavax since June 2011. Prior to joining the Company, Dr. Hahn was
Vice President of Antibody Manufacturing and later Vice President of
Vaccine Manufacturing at MedImmune, LLC, with responsibilities for both
U.S. and non-U.S. manufacturing sites. Dr. Hahn spent more than 15 years
in vaccine manufacturing with Merck & Co.

Senior Vice President, Business Development of Novavax since
November 2011. Mr. Wilson was most recently the Chief Financial Officer
at Supernus Pharmaceuticals beginning in 2009. He was previously Senior
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel of Iomai
Corporation, which was acquired in 2008 by Intercell AG. He was the
Acting General Counsel of North American Vaccine,
its
acquisition by Baxter International in 2000.

Inc. until

11

Availability of Information

Novavax was incorporated in 1987 under the laws of the State of Delaware. Our principal executive
offices are located at 9920 Belward Campus Drive, Rockville, Maryland, 20850. Our telephone number is
(240) 268-2000 and our website address is www.novavax.com. The contents of our website are not part of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.

We make available, free of charge and through our website, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly
Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to any such reports filed or
furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as
reasonably practicable after filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission.

12

Item 1A. RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider the following risk factors in evaluating our business. There are a number
of risk factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those that are indicated by
forward-looking statements. Some of the risks described relate principally to our business and the industry in
which we operate. Others relate principally to the securities market and ownership of our common stock. The
risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties that
we are unaware of, or that we currently deem immaterial, also may become important factors that affect us. If
any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially
and adversely affected. You should also consider the other information included in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS

We have a history of losses and our future profitability is uncertain.

Our expenses have exceeded our revenue since our formation in 1987, and our accumulated deficit at
December 31, 2011 was $330 million. Our revenue for the last three fiscal years was $14.7 million in 2011,
$0.3 million in 2010 and $0.3 million in 2009. Prior to 2011, we recorded limited revenue from research
contracts, licenses and agreements to provide vaccine candidates, services and technologies. We cannot be
certain that we will be successful in entering into strategic alliances or collaborative arrangements with other
companies that will result in significant revenue to offset our expenses. Our net losses for the last three fiscal
years were $19.4 million in 2011, $35.7 million in 2010 and $40.3 million in 2009.

Our recent historical losses have predominantly resulted from research and development expenses for our
vaccine product candidates, manufacturing-related expenses, costs related to protection of our intellectual
property and for other general operating expenses. Our expenses have exceeded our revenue since inception.
We believe our expenses will continue to increase, as a result of higher research and development efforts to
support the development of our vaccine candidates.

Although certain specified costs associated with the development of our influenza vaccines may be
reimbursed under the contract with HHS BARDA, nevertheless we expect to continue to incur significant
operating expenses and anticipate that our losses will increase in the foreseeable future as we seek to:

•

•

•

•

•

conduct clinical trials for RSV;

conduct pre-clinical studies for other early-stage vaccine candidates;

comply with the FDA’s manufacturing facility requirements;

scale-up our manufacturing process for commercial-scale and cost-efficiency; and

maintain, expand and protect our intellectual property portfolio.

As a result, we expect our cumulative operating losses to increase until such time, if ever, that product
sales, licensing fees, royalties, milestones, contract research and other sources generate sufficient revenue to
fund our operations. We cannot predict when, if ever, we might achieve profitability and cannot be certain that
we will be able to sustain profitability, if achieved.

We have limited financial resources and we are not certain that we will be able to maintain our

current level of operations or be able to fund the further development of our product candidates.

We do not expect to generate revenue from product sales, licensing fees, royalties, milestones, contract
research or other sources in an amount sufficient to fully fund our operations for the foreseeable future, and
we will therefore use our cash resources and expect to require additional funds to maintain our operations,
continue our research and development programs, commence future pre-clinical studies and clinical trials, seek
regulatory approvals and manufacture and market our products. We will seek such additional funds through
public or private equity or debt financings, collaborative licensing and development arrangements, non-dilutive
government contracts and grants and other sources. While we continue to apply for contracts or grants from
there are no assurances that we would be
academic institutions, non-profits and governmental entities,
successful. We cannot be certain that adequate additional funding will be available to us on acceptable terms,

13

if at all. If we cannot raise the additional funds required for our anticipated operations, we may be required to
delay significantly, reduce the scope of or eliminate one or more of our research or development programs,
downsize our general and administrative infrastructure, or seek alternative measures to avoid insolvency,
including arrangements with collaborative partners or others that may require us to relinquish rights to certain
of our technologies, product candidates or products. If we raise additional funds through future offerings of
shares of our common stock or other securities, such offerings would cause dilution of current stockholders’
percentage ownership in the Company, which could be substantial. Future offerings also could have a material
and adverse effect on the price of our common stock.

Capital and credit market conditions may adversely affect our access to capital, cost of capital and

ability to execute our business plan as scheduled.

Access to capital markets is critical to our ability to operate. Traditionally, biopharmaceutical companies
have funded their research and development expenditures through raising capital
in the equity markets.
Declines and uncertainties in these markets in the past have severely restricted raising new capital and have
affected companies’ ability to continue to expand or fund existing research and development efforts. We
require significant capital for research and development for our product candidates and clinical trials. The
general economic and capital market conditions, both in the U.S. and worldwide, have been volatile in the
past and have adversely affected our access to capital and increased the cost of capital. There is no certainty
that the capital and credit markets will be available to raise additional capital on favorable terms. If economic
conditions become worse, our future cost of equity or debt capital and access to the capital markets could be
adversely affected. In addition, our inability to access the capital markets on favorable terms due to our low
stock price, could affect our ability to execute our business plan as scheduled. Moreover, we rely and intend
to rely on third-parties, including our clinical research organizations and certain other important vendors and
consultants. As a result of the global economic situation,
there may be a disruption or delay in the
performance of our third-party contractors and suppliers. If such third-parties are unable to adequately satisfy
their contractual commitments to us in a timely manner, our business could be adversely affected.

Even with the HHS BARDA contract award, we may not be able to fully fund our influenza programs.

The HHS BARDA contract

is a cost-plus-fixed-fee contract

that only reimburses certain specified
activities that have been previously authorized by HHS BARDA. There is no guarantee that additional
activities will not be needed and, if so, that HHS BARDA will reimburse us for these activities. Additionally,
requirements of a federal government contractor,
we have no experience meeting the significant
which includes having appropriate accounting, project
tracking and earned-value management systems
implemented and operational, and we may not be able to meet these requirements in a timely way or at all.
Performance under the HHS BARDA contract requires that we comply with appropriate regulations and
operational mandates, with which we have minimal or no operational experience. Our ability to be regularly
and fully reimbursed for our activities will depend on our ability to comply and demonstrate compliance with
such requirements.

The HHS BARDA contract award does not guarantee that we will be successful in future clinical
trials, that the vaccine candidates will be licensed by the FDA, or that the contract award will continue to
be available throughout the contract period.

The HHS BARDA contract provides a cost-plus-fixed-fee reimbursement opportunity for certain specified
clinical and development activities, but we remain fully responsible for conducting these activities. The award
of the HHS BARDA contract does not guarantee that any of these activities will be successful. Our inability
to be successful with certain key clinical or development activities could jeopardize our ability to get
FDA licensure to sell our vaccines. In addition,
the HHS BARDA contract has milestones that will be
reviewed by HHS BARDA on an interim basis and if these milestones are not achieved, the HHS BARDA
contract may be cancelled.

14

Our expectation that our seasonal influenza vaccine candidate will be granted accelerated approval by
the FDA is not guaranteed and if we don’t get accelerated approval, development of this vaccine will take
longer and cost significantly more prior to BLA approval.

FDA regulations allow for the accelerated approval of a recombinant vaccine based on surrogate
endpoints for products that treat serious diseases and fill an unmet medical need, which can allow developers
to obtain licensure well ahead of the timeline for demonstrating clinical results in a traditional efficacy trial.
There is no guarantee the FDA will view the development of our seasonal influenza vaccine as meeting an
unmet medical need, nor is there any guarantee the FDA will agree to our proposal for utilizing our surrogate
endpoints as a basis for BLA approval. If our seasonal influenza vaccine does not get accelerated approval
from the FDA, it is likely that we will need to conduct larger and more expensive efficacy clinical trials and
that licensure of our seasonal vaccine will be materially delayed for a year or more, assuming such licensure
occurs at all.

Our collaborations with regional partners, such as Cadila and LGLS, as well as contracts with
international providers, expose us to additional risks associated with doing business outside the U.S., and
any adverse event could have a material negative impact on our operations.

We have formed a joint venture with Cadila in India, entered into a license agreement with LGLS in
South Korea, and have entered into other agreements and arrangements with companies in other countries. We
plan to continue to enter into collaborations or partnerships with companies, non-profit organizations and local
governments in other parts of the world. Risks of conducting business outside the U.S. include:

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

multiple regulatory requirements could affect our ability to develop, manufacture and sell products in
such local markets;

compliance with anti-bribery laws such as the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and
similar anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions;

trade protections measures and import and export licensing requirements;

different labor regulations;

changes in environmental, health and safety laws;

exchange rates;

potentially negative consequences from changes in or interpretations of tax laws;

political instability and actual or anticipated military or potential conflicts;

economic instability, inflation, recession and interest rate fluctuations;

minimal or diminished protection of intellectual property in some countries; and

possible nationalization and expropriation.

These risks, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on our business,

financial conditions, results of operations and cash flows.

Our

strategy to enter

into regional

relationships may hinder our ability to engage in a

larger transaction.

We have entered into regional collaborations to develop our product candidates in certain parts of the
world, and we may enter into additional regional collaborations. Our relationships with Cadila and LGLS are
examples of this strategy. These relationships are likely to involve the licensing of our technology to our
partner or entering into a distribution agreement, frequently on an exclusive basis. Generally, these exclusive
agreements are restricted to certain territories. Because we have entered into exclusive license and distribution
to enter into collaborations with us on a
agreements,
worldwide-scale. Also, these regional relationships may make us an unattractive target for an acquisition.

larger companies may not be interested, or able,

15

We are a biopharmaceutical company and face significant risk in developing, manufacturing and

commercializing our products.

We focus our research and development activities on vaccines, an area in which we have particular
strengths and a technology that appears promising. The outcome of any research and development program is
highly uncertain. Only a small fraction of biopharmaceutical development programs ultimately result
in
commercial products or even product candidates and a number of events could delay our development efforts
and negatively impact our ability to obtain regulatory approval for, and to manufacture, market and sell, a
product candidate. Product candidates that initially appear promising often fail to yield successful products. In
many cases, pre-clinical studies or clinical trials will show that a product candidate is not efficacious or that it
raises safety concerns or has other side effects that outweigh its intended benefit. Success in pre-clinical or
early clinical trials may not translate into success in large-scale clinical trials. Further, success in clinical trials
will likely lead to increased investment, accelerating cumulative losses to bring such products to market. Even
if clinical trial results appear positive, regulatory approval may not be obtained if the FDA does not agree
with our interpretation of the results and we may face challenges when scaling-up the production process to
commercial levels. Even after a product is approved and launched, general usage or post-marketing trials may
identify safety or other previously unknown problems with the product, which may result
in regulatory
approvals being suspended, limited to narrow indications or revoked, which may otherwise prevent successful
successful
commercialization.
commercialization of our products.

competition in the vaccine

industry could also limit

Intense

the

Many of our competitors have significantly greater resources and experience, which may negatively

impact our commercial opportunities and those of our current and future licensees.

The biotechnology and pharmaceutical

technological change. We have many potential competitors,

to intense competition and rapid and
significant
including major pharmaceutical
companies, specialized biotechnology firms, academic institutions, government agencies and private and public
research institutions. Many of our competitors have significantly greater financial and technical resources,
experience and expertise in:

industries are subject

•

•

•

•

•

•

research and development;

pre-clinical testing;

designing and implementing clinical trials;

regulatory processes and approvals;

production and manufacturing; and

sales and marketing of approved products.

Principal competitive factors in our industry include:

•

•

•

•

•

•

the quality and breadth of an organization’s technology;

management of the organization and the execution of the organization’s strategy;

the skill and experience of an organization’s employees and its ability to recruit and retain skilled
and experienced employees;

an organization’s intellectual property portfolio;

the range of capabilities, from target identification and validation to drug discovery and development
to manufacturing and marketing; and

availability

the
commercialization activities.

of

substantial

capital

resources

to

fund

discovery,

development

and

16

Large and established companies such as Merck & Co., Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc, Novartis, Inc., sanofi
pasteur, Pfizer Inc. and MedImmune, LLC (a subsidiary of AstraZeneca PLC), among others, compete in the
vaccine market. In particular, these companies have greater experience and expertise in securing government
contracts and grants to support their research and development efforts, conducting testing and clinical trials,
obtaining regulatory approvals to market products, manufacturing such products on a broad scale and
marketing approved products.

There are many seasonal influenza vaccines currently approved and marketed. Competition in the sale of
these seasonal influenza vaccines is intense. Therefore, newly developed and approved products must be
differentiated from existing vaccines in order to have commercial success. In order to show differentiation in
the seasonal influenza market, a product must be more efficacious, particularly in older adults, and/or be less
expensive and quicker to manufacture. Many of our competitors are working on new products and new
generations of current products, each of which is intended to be more efficacious than products currently being
marketed. Our seasonal influenza product may not prove to be more efficacious than current products or
products under development by our competitors. Further, our manufacturing system may not provide enough
savings of time or money to provide the required differentiation for commercial success.

We are also aware that there are as many as ten companies with active RSV vaccine programs at various
stages of development. Thus, while there is no RSV vaccine currently on the market, there is likely to be
significant and consistent competition as these active programs mature. Different RSV vaccines may work
better for different segments of the population, so it may be difficult for a single RSV vaccine manufacturer to
provide a vaccine that is marketable to multiple segments of the population. Geographic markets are also
likely to vary significantly which may make it difficult to market a single RSV vaccine worldwide. Even if a
manufacturer brings an RSV vaccine to license, it is likely that competitors will continue to work on new
products that could be more efficacious and/or less-expensive. Our RSV vaccine may not be as far along in
development as other active RSV vaccine programs, nor as efficacious as products under development by
competing companies.

Smaller or early-stage companies and research institutions may also prove to be significant competitors,
particularly through collaborative arrangements with large and established pharmaceutical companies. As these
companies develop their technologies, they may develop proprietary positions, which may prevent or limit our
product development and commercialization efforts. We will also face competition from these parties in
recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel, establishing clinical trial sites and
subject
trials and in acquiring and in-licensing technologies and products
complementary to our programs or potentially advantageous to our business. If any of our competitors
succeed in obtaining approval from the FDA or other regulatory authorities for their products sooner than
we do or for products that are more effective or less costly than ours, our commercial opportunity could be
significantly reduced.

registration for clinical

In order to effectively compete, we will have to make substantial investments in development, testing,
manufacturing and sales and marketing or partner with one or more established companies. There is no
assurance that we will be successful in gaining significant market share for any product or product candidate.
Our technologies and products also may be rendered obsolete or non-competitive as a result of products
introduced by our competitors to the marketplace more rapidly and at a lower cost.

If we are unable to attract or retain key management or other personnel, we may experience delays in

product development.

We depend on our senior executive officers, as well as key scientific and other personnel. The loss of
these individuals could harm our business and significantly delay or prevent the achievement of research,
development or business objectives. We have had several turnover situations in key executive positions and
the lack of management continuity and resulting lack of long-term history with our Company along with the
learning curve that executives experience when they join our management team could result in operational and
administrative inefficiencies and added costs. If we were to experience additional turnover at the executive
level, these risks would be exacerbated.

17

We may not be able to attract qualified individuals for other key management or other personnel
positions on terms acceptable to us. Competition for qualified employees is intense among pharmaceutical and
biotechnology companies, and the loss of qualified employees, or an inability to attract, retain and motivate
additional highly skilled employees required for the expansion of our activities, could hinder our ability to
complete clinical trials successfully and develop marketable products.

We also rely from time to time on outside advisors who assist us in formulating our research and
development and clinical strategy. We may not be able to attract and retain these individuals on acceptable
terms, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations.

We may have product liability exposure.

The administration of drugs or vaccines to humans, whether in clinical

trials or after marketing
clearances are obtained, can result in product liability claims. We maintain product liability insurance coverage
in the total amount of $20 million aggregate for all claims arising from the use of products in clinical trials
prior to FDA approval. Coverage is relatively expensive, and the market pricing can significantly fluctuate.
Therefore, we may not be able to maintain insurance at a reasonable cost. There can be no assurance that we
will be able to maintain our existing insurance coverage or obtain coverage for the use of our other products
in the future. This insurance coverage and our resources may not be sufficient to satisfy all liabilities resulting
from product liability claims. A successful claim may prevent us from obtaining adequate product liability
insurance in the future on commercially desirable items, if at all. Even if a claim is not successful, defending
such a claim would be time-consuming and expensive, may damage our reputation in the marketplace and
would likely divert management’s attention.

Regardless of merit or eventual outcome, liability claims may result in:

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

decreased demand for our products;

impairment of our business reputation;

withdrawal of clinical trial participants;

costs of related litigation;

substantial monetary awards to subjects or other claimants;

loss of revenue; and

inability to commercialize our product candidates.

We may not be able to win government, academic institution or non-profit contracts or grants.

From time to time, we may apply for contracts or grants from academic institutions, government agencies
and non-profit entities. Such contracts or grants can be highly attractive because they provide capital to fund
the ongoing development of our technologies and product candidates without diluting our stockholders.
However, there is often significant competition for these contracts or grants. Entities offering contracts or
grants may have requirements to apply for or to otherwise be eligible to receive certain contracts or grants
that our competitors may be able to satisfy that we cannot. In addition, such entities may make arbitrary
decisions as to whether to offer contracts or make grants, to whom the contracts or grants will be awarded and
the size of the contracts or grants to each awardee. Even if we are able to satisfy the award requirements,
there is no guarantee that we will be a successful awardee. Therefore, we may not be able to win any
contracts or grants in a timely manner, if at all.

18

The value of our warrants outstanding is subject to potentially material increases and decreases based

on fluctuations in the price of our common stock.

In July 2008, we completed a registered direct offering of 6,686,650 units, raising approximately
$17.5 million in net proceeds. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock and a warrant to purchase
0.5 shares of common stock at a price of $2.68 per unit. The warrants represent the right to acquire an
aggregate of 3,343,325 shares of common stock at a price of $3.62 per share and are exercisable through
July 31, 2013.

We account for the warrants as a derivative instrument, and changes in the fair value of the warrants are
included under other income (expense) in the Company’s statements of operations for each reporting period.
At December 31, 2011, the aggregate fair value of the warrant liability included in the Company’s balance
sheet was $0.4 million. We use the Monte Carlo Simulation model to determine the fair value of the Warrants.
As a result, the valuation of this derivative instrument is subjective, and the option-pricing model requires the
input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price volatility and probability of a
fundamental transaction (a strategic merger or sale). Changes in these assumptions can materially affect the
fair value estimate. We could, at any point in time, ultimately incur amounts different than the carrying value,
which could have a significant impact on our results of operations.

Raising additional capital by issuing securities or through collaboration and licensing arrangements
may cause dilution to existing stockholders or require us to relinquish rights to our technologies or
product candidates.

If we are unable to partner with a third-party to advance the development of one or more of our vaccine
candidates, we will need to raise money through additional debt or equity financings. To the extent that we
raise additional capital by issuing equity securities, our stockholders will experience immediate dilution, which
may be significant. To the extent
through licensing arrangements or
that we raise additional capital
arrangements with collaborative partners, we may be required to relinquish, on terms that may not be
favorable to us, rights to some of our technologies or product candidates that we would otherwise seek to
develop or commercialize ourselves. In addition, current economic conditions may also negatively affect the
desire or ability of potential collaborators to enter into transactions with us. They may also have to delay or
cancel research and development projects or reduce their overall budgets.

Our investments consist of auction rate securities, which present potential liquidity concerns.

As of December 31, 2011, we had $5.1 million invested in three auction rate securities, which were
classified as short-term investments available-for-sale and carried at their estimated fair value of $4.2 million.
Auction rate securities are long-term debt instruments that provide liquidity through a competitive bidding
process known as a ‘‘Dutch Auction’’ that resets the applicable interest rates at pre-determined calendar
intervals. As a result of the issues that presently exist in the credit markets, we may be unable to liquidate
some or all of our auction rate securities when we are in need of the cash to fund operations at prices that are
acceptable to us. Even if we are able to liquidate the investments, the sales may be at a loss. In addition,
given the complexity of auction rate securities and their valuations, our estimates of their fair value may differ
from the actual amount we would be able to collect in the ultimate sale. It is uncertain as to when the
liquidity issues relating to these investments will improve.

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT RISKS

Because our vaccine product development efforts depend on new and rapidly evolving technologies, we

cannot be certain that our efforts will be successful.

Our vaccine product development efforts depend on new, rapidly evolving technologies and on the
marketability and profitability of our products. Commercialization of our vaccine products could fail for a
variety of reasons, and include the possibility that:

•

our VLP and recombinant nanoparticle vaccine technologies, any or all of the products based on
such technologies or our proprietary manufacturing process will be ineffective or unsafe, or
otherwise fail to receive necessary regulatory clearances or commercial viability;

19

•

•

•

•

•

we are unable to scale-up our manufacturing capabilities in a cost-effective manner;

the products, if safe and effective, will be difficult to manufacture on a large-scale or uneconomical
to market;

our manufacturing facility will fail to continue to pass regulatory inspections;

proprietary rights of third-parties will prevent us or our collaborators from exploiting technologies,
and manufacturing or marketing products; and

third-party competitors will gain greater market share due to superior products or marketing
capabilities.

We have not completed the development of vaccine products and we may not succeed in obtaining the

FDA approval necessary to sell such vaccine products.

The development, manufacture and marketing of our pharmaceutical and biological products are subject
to government regulation in the U.S. and other countries. In the U.S. and most foreign countries, we must
complete rigorous pre-clinical testing and extensive clinical trials that demonstrate the safety and efficacy of a
product in order to apply for regulatory approval to market the product. None of our vaccine products have
yet gained regulatory approval in the U.S. or elsewhere. We also have product candidates in clinical trials and
pre-clinical laboratory or animal studies.

The steps required by the FDA before our proposed investigational products may be marketed in the

U.S. include:

•

•

•

•

•

•

performance of pre-clinical (animal and laboratory) tests;

submissions to the FDA of an IND, which must become effective before clinical
commence;

trials may

performance of adequate and well-controlled clinical trials to establish the safety and efficacy of the
investigational product in the intended target population;

performance of a consistent and reproducible manufacturing process intended for commercial use,
including appropriate manufacturing data and regulatory inspections;

submission to the FDA of a BLA or a NDA; and

FDA approval of the BLA or NDA before any commercial sale or shipment of the product.

The processes are expensive and can take many years to complete, and we may not be able to
demonstrate the safety and efficacy of our products to the satisfaction of regulatory authorities. The start of
clinical trials can be delayed or take longer than anticipated for many and varied reasons, many of which are
out of our control. For example, when we filed an IND for our RSV vaccine candidate in 2010, the FDA
asked us questions about our chemistry, manufacturing and controls; the FDA put our planned Phase I trial on
temporary clinical hold until we provided complete and appropriate answers and the hold was lifted. Safety
concerns may emerge that could lengthen the ongoing trials or require additional trials to be conducted.
Promising results in early trials may not be replicated in subsequent studies. Regulatory authorities may also
require additional testing, and we may be required to demonstrate that our proposed products represent an
improved form of treatment over existing therapies, which we may be unable to do without conducting further
clinical trials. Moreover, if the FDA or a foreign regulatory body grants regulatory approval of a product, the
approval may be limited to specific indications or limited with respect
to its distribution. Expanded or
additional indications for approved products may not be approved, which could limit our revenue. Foreign
regulatory authorities may apply similar limitations or may refuse to grant any approval. Consequently, even if
we believe that pre-clinical and clinical data are sufficient to support regulatory approval for our product
candidates, the FDA and foreign regulatory authorities may not ultimately grant approval for commercial sale
in any jurisdiction. If our vaccine candidates are not approved, our ability to generate revenue will be limited
and our business will be adversely affected.

20

If we are unable to manufacture our vaccines in sufficient quantities, at sufficient yields or are unable
to obtain regulatory approvals for a manufacturing facility for our vaccines, we may experience delays in
product development, clinical trials, regulatory approval and commercial distribution.

Completion of our clinical trials and commercialization of our vaccine product candidates require access
to, or development of,
facilities to manufacture our product candidates at sufficient yields and at
commercial-scale. We have limited experience manufacturing any of our product candidates in the volumes
that will be necessary to support large-scale clinical trials or commercial sales. Efforts to establish these
capabilities may not meet initial expectations as to scheduling, scale-up, reproducibility, yield, purity, cost,
potency or quality.

If we are unable to manufacture our product candidates in clinical quantities or, when necessary, in
commercial quantities and at sufficient yields,
third-party
manufacturers must also receive FDA approval before they can produce clinical material or commercial
products. Our vaccines may be in competition with other products for access to these facilities and may be
subject to delays in manufacture if third-parties give other products greater priority. We may not be able to
enter into any necessary third-party manufacturing arrangements on acceptable terms, or on a timely basis. In
addition, we have to enter into technical transfer agreements and share our know-how with the third-party
manufacturers, which can be time-consuming and may result in delays.

rely on third-parties. Other

then we must

Influenza vaccines are seasonal in nature. If a vaccine is not available early enough in the influenza
season, we would likely have difficulty selling the vaccine. Further, pandemic outbreaks present only
short-term opportunities for us. There is no way to predict when there will be a pandemic outbreak, the strain
of the influenza or how long the pandemic will last. For these reasons, any delay in the delivery of an
influenza vaccine could result in lower sales volumes, lower sale prices, or no sales. Because the strain of the
seasonal
inventory of seasonal vaccine cannot be sold during a subsequent
influenza season. Any delay in the manufacture of our influenza vaccines could adversely affect our ability to
sell the vaccines.

influenza changes annually,

Our reliance on contract manufacturers may adversely affect our operations or result in unforeseen delays
or other problems beyond our control. Because of contractual restraints and the limited number of third-party
manufacturers with the expertise, required regulatory approvals and facilities to manufacture our bulk vaccines
on a commercial-scale, replacement of a manufacturer may be expensive and time-consuming and may cause
interruptions in the production of our vaccine. A third-party manufacturer may also encounter difficulties in
production. These problems may include:

•

•

•

•

•

•

difficulties with production costs, scale-up and yields;

availability of raw materials and supplies;

quality control and assurance;

shortages of qualified personnel;

compliance with strictly enforced federal, state and foreign regulations that vary in each country
where product might be sold; and

lack of capital funding.

As a result, any delay or interruption could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial

condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Our vaccine products may contain adventitious agents.

Because our vaccines are produced in animal cell substrates, there are risks that infectious diseases that
are unique to the animal substrates can be transmitted to human recipients. The FDA seeks to ensure that
vaccine products do not contain adventitious agents or, if they do, that such adventitious agents are not
harmful to the recipient. Demonstrating that adventitious agents in vaccines are not present or, if they are
present, that they are not harmful, is potentially difficult and expensive. Even with significant testing, we may

21

not be able to demonstrate to the FDA that our vaccines are either free of adventitious agents or that any
adventitious agents that do occur are harmless to the recipient.

Our new manufacturing facility may not be available in a timely way, which may impede or delay our
ability to manufacture one or more vaccine candidates for subsequent clinical trials or obtain BLA for
such vaccines.

Although we have obtained a new manufacturing facility that we believe is capable of manufacturing
Phase III vaccine candidates under our influenza program, the new facility requires moderate refurbishing in
order to implement and optimize our manufacturing process. This work is expected to be completed in 2012;
however, there are risks associated with such refurbishment, that include but are not limited to, unforeseeable
licensing and permitting delays or rejections,
construction delays, contractor issues, subcontractor delays,
limitations and delays on the installation of new or custom-ordered equipment,
issues associated with
validating equipment, processes or other aspects of insuring cGMP manufacturing, delays or disputes related
to obtaining landlord consent, and delays associated with moving equipment from our current facility to the
new facility. Even if we meet all the scheduled activities associated with bringing the new facility online,
there are many aspects of the project that rely on third party contractors and subcontractors and independent
regulatory reviewers, and there can be no guarantee that they will meet expected timeframes.

We may not utilize our current manufacturing facility, and if so, we may not be able to defray the

lease payments and operating expenses of that facility.

With our new manufacturing facility in Gaithersburg, we expect to move out of our current facility in
Rockville, Maryland in 2012. We do not yet know whether and to what extent we may need to utilize a
portion of the Rockville facility after we move. The expenses of owning two manufacturing facilities are
significant and while we have structured our new facility arrangement to limit our financial exposure over the
next two to three years, we expect to sublease all or a portion of the Rockville facility prior to the end of our
lease on January 31, 2017. However, there is no guarantee that we will be able to defray the expense of
owning two manufacturing facilities long term. Subleasing the Rockville facility may prove difficult and even
if we do so, the sublease payments may not fully cover our lease payments and operating expenses.

We must identify products and product candidates for development with our technologies and establish

successful third-party relationships.

The near and long-term viability of our vaccine product candidates will depend in part on our ability to
successfully establish new strategic collaborations with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies,
non-profit organizations and government agencies. Establishing strategic collaborations and obtaining
government funding is difficult and time-consuming. Potential collaborators may reject collaborations based
upon their assessment of our financial, regulatory or intellectual property position or based on their internal
pipeline; government agencies may reject contract or grant applications based on their assessment of public
need, the public interest, our products’ ability to address these areas, or other reasons beyond our expectations
or control. If we fail
to establish a sufficient number of collaborations or government relationships on
acceptable terms, we may not be able to commercialize our vaccine product candidates or generate sufficient
revenue to fund further research and development efforts.

Even if we establish new collaborations or obtain government funding, these relationships may never
result in the successful development or commercialization of any vaccine product candidates for several
reasons, including the fact that:

•

•

•

we may not have the ability to control the activities of our partner and cannot provide assurance that
they will fulfill
to the license, development and
commercialization of products and product candidates, in a timely manner or at all;

their obligations to us,

including with respect

such partners may not devote sufficient resources to our products and product candidates or properly
maintain or defend our intellectual property rights;

any failure on the part of our partners to perform or satisfy their obligations to us could lead to
delays in the development or commercialization of our products and product candidates and affect
our ability to realize product revenue; and

22

•

disagreements,
collaborators, could result
terminate
may
commercialization activities.

delay

or

including disputes over

the ownership of

technology developed with such
in litigation, which would be time-consuming and expensive, and
and

development

regulatory

approvals

research

efforts,

and

Our collaborators will be subject to the same regulatory approval of their manufacturing facility and
process as Novavax. Before we could begin commercial manufacturing of any of our product candidates, we
inspection before FDA approval and comply with the
and our collaborators must pass a pre-approval
FDA’s cGMP. If our collaborators fail to comply with these requirements, our product candidates would not be
approved. If our collaborators fail to comply with these requirements after approval, we would be subject
to possible regulatory action and may be limited in the jurisdictions in which we are permitted to sell
our products.

If we or our partners fail to maintain our existing agreements or in the event we fail to establish
agreements as necessary, we could be required to undertake research, development, manufacturing and
commercialization activities solely at our own expense. These activities would significantly increase our
capital requirements and, given our lack of sales, marketing and distribution capabilities, significantly delay
the commercialization of products and product candidates.

Because we depend on third-parties to conduct some of our laboratory testing, clinical trials, and

manufacturing, we may encounter delays in or lose some control over our efforts to develop products.

We are dependent on third-party research organizations to conduct some of our laboratory testing, clinical
trials and manufacturing activities. If we are unable to obtain any necessary services on acceptable terms, we
may not complete our product development efforts in a timely manner. We may lose some control over these
activities and become too dependent upon these parties. These third-parties may not complete testing or
manufacturing activities on schedule, within budget, or when we request. We may not be able to secure and
maintain suitable research organizations to conduct our laboratory testing, clinical trials and manufacturing
activities. We have not manufactured any of our product candidates at a commercial level and may need to
identify additional third-party manufacturers to scale-up and manufacture our products.

We are responsible for confirming that each of our clinical trials is conducted in accordance with its
general investigational plan and protocol. Moreover, the FDA and foreign regulatory agencies require us to
comply with regulations and standards, commonly referred to as good clinical practices, for conducting,
recording and reporting the results of clinical trials to assure that data and reported results are credible and
accurate and that the trial participants are adequately protected. The FDA and foreign regulatory agencies also
require us to comply with good manufacturing practices. Our reliance on third-parties does not relieve us of
these responsibilities and requirements. If these third-parties do not successfully carry out their contractual
duties or regulatory obligations or meet expected deadlines, if the third-parties need to be replaced or if the
quality or accuracy of the data they obtain is compromised or the product they manufacture is contaminated
due to the failure to adhere to our clinical and manufacturing protocols or regulatory requirements or for other
reasons, our pre-clinical development activities or clinical trials may be extended, delayed, suspended or
terminated, and we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval of, or commercially manufacture, our
product candidates.

Our collaborations may not be profitable.

We have entered into a co-marketing agreement with GEHC for a pandemic influenza vaccine solution
international countries. The collaboration incorporates GEHC’s bioprocessing/manufacturing
select

for
solutions and design expertise with our manufacturing platform.

We have formed a joint venture with Cadila in India. In connection with this joint venture, we entered
into a master services agreement pursuant to which we may request services from Cadila in the areas of
biologics research, pre-clinical development, clinical development, process development, manufacturing
scale-up and general manufacturing related services in India. We and Cadila amended the master services
agreement in July 2011 to extend the term by one year for which services can be provided by Cadila under
this agreement. Under the revised terms, if, by March 2013, the amount of services provided by Cadila under
the master services agreement is less than $7.5 million, the Company will pay Cadila the portion of the

23

shortfall amount that is less than or equal to $2.0 million and 50% of the portion of the shortfall amount that
exceeds $2.0 million. Through December 31, 2011, we have purchased $0.2 million in services from Cadila
pursuant to this agreement. See also the information regarding the master services agreement in Note 15 to the
financial statements included herewith.

We have entered into a license agreement with LGLS that allows them to use our manufacturing and
if at all,
production technology to develop and sell our influenza vaccines. We cannot predict when,
these relationships will lead to approved products, sales, or otherwise provide revenue to the Company or
become profitable.

We have limited marketing capabilities, and if we are unable to enter into collaborations with
in

marketing partners or develop our own sales and marketing capability, we may not be successful
commercializing any approved products.

We currently have no sales, marketing or distribution capabilities. As a result, we will depend on
collaborations with third-parties that have established distribution systems and sales forces. To the extent that
we enter into co-promotion or other licensing arrangements, our revenue will depend upon the efforts of
third-parties, over which we may have little or no control. If we are unable to reach and maintain agreements
with one or more pharmaceutical companies or collaborators, we may be required to market our products
directly. Developing a marketing and sales force is expensive and time-consuming and could delay a product
launch. We cannot be certain that we will be able to attract and retain qualified sales personnel or otherwise
develop this capability.

Our product candidates may never achieve market acceptance even if we obtain regulatory approvals.

Even if we receive regulatory approvals for the commercial sale of our product candidates,
the
commercial success of these product candidates will depend on, among other things, their acceptance by
physicians, patients, third-party payers such as health insurance companies and other members of the medical
community as a vaccine and cost-effective alternative to competing products. If our product candidates fail to
gain market acceptance, we may be unable to earn sufficient revenue to continue our business. Market
acceptance of, and demand for, any product that we may develop and commercialize will depend on many
factors, including:

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

our ability to provide acceptable evidence of safety and efficacy;

the prevalence and severity of adverse side effects;

whether our vaccines are differentiated from other vaccines based on immunogenicity;

availability, relative cost and relative efficacy of alternative and competing treatments;

the effectiveness of our marketing and distribution strategy;

publicity concerning our products or competing products and treatments; and

our ability to obtain sufficient third-party insurance coverage or reimbursement.

In particular, there are significant challenges to market acceptance for seasonal influenza vaccines. For
our seasonal vaccine to be accepted in the market, we must demonstrate differentiation from other seasonal
vaccines that are currently approved and marketed. This can mean that the vaccine is more effective in certain
populations, such as in older adults, or cheaper and quicker to produce. There are no assurances that our
vaccine will be more efficacious than other vaccines.

If our product candidates do not become widely accepted by physicians, patients, third-party payers and
other members of the medical community, our business, financial condition and results of operations would be
materially and adversely affected.

24

If reforms in the health care industry make reimbursement for our potential products less likely, the

market for our potential products will be reduced, and we could lose potential sources of revenue.

Our success may depend, in part, on the extent to which reimbursement for the costs of vaccines will be
available from third-party payers such as government health administration authorities, private health insurers,
managed care programs and other organizations. Over the past decade, the cost of health care has risen
significantly, and there have been numerous proposals by legislators, regulators and third-party health care
payers to curb these costs. Some of these proposals have involved limitations on the amount of reimbursement
for certain products. Similar federal or state health care legislation may be adopted in the future and any
products that we or our collaborators seek to commercialize may not be considered cost-effective. Adequate
third-party insurance coverage may not be available for us to establish and maintain price levels that are
sufficient for realization of an appropriate return on our investment in product development. Moreover, the
existence or threat of cost control measures could cause our corporate collaborators to be less willing or able
to pursue research and development programs related to our product candidates.

REGULATORY RISKS

We may fail to obtain regulatory approval for our products on a timely basis or comply with our

continuing regulatory obligations after approval is obtained.

Delays in obtaining regulatory approval can be extremely costly in terms of lost sales opportunities,
losing any potential marketing advantage of being early to market and increased trial costs. The speed with
which we begin and complete our pre-clinical studies necessary to begin clinical trials, clinical trials and our
applications for marketing approval will depend on several factors, including the following:

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

our ability to manufacture or obtain sufficient quantities of materials for use in necessary pre-clinical
studies and clinical trials;

prior regulatory agency review and approval;

Institutional Review Board approval of the protocol and the informed consent form;

the rate of subject or patient enrollment and retention, which is a function of many factors, including
the size of the subject or patient population, the proximity of subjects and patients to clinical sites,
the eligibility criteria for the trial and the nature of the protocol;

negative test results or side effects experienced by trial participants;

analysis of data obtained from pre-clinical and clinical activities, which are susceptible to varying
interpretations and which interpretations could delay, limit or prevent further studies or regulatory
approval;

the availability of skilled and experienced staff to conduct and monitor clinical trials and to prepare
the appropriate regulatory applications; and

changes in the policies of regulatory authorities for drug or vaccine approval during the period of
product development.

We have limited experience in conducting and managing the pre-clinical studies and clinical
trials
necessary to obtain regulatory marketing approvals. We may not be permitted to continue or commence
additional clinical trials. We also face the risk that the results of our clinical trials may be inconsistent with
the results obtained in pre-clinical studies or clinical trials of similar products or that the results obtained in
later phases of clinical
trials may be inconsistent with those obtained in earlier phases. A number of
companies in the biopharmaceutical and product development industry have suffered significant setbacks in
advanced clinical trials, even after experiencing promising results in early animal and human testing.

Regulatory agencies may require us or our collaborators to delay, restrict or discontinue clinical trials on
various grounds, including a finding that the subjects or patients are being exposed to an unacceptable health
risk. In addition, we or our collaborators may be unable to submit applications to regulatory agencies within
the time frame we currently expect. Once submitted, applications must be approved by various regulatory
agencies before we or our collaborators can commercialize the product described in the application. All

25

statutes and regulations governing the conduct of clinical trials are subject to change in the future, which
could affect the cost of such clinical trials. Any unanticipated costs or delays in our clinical trials could delay
our ability to generate revenue and harm our financial condition and results of operations.

Failure to obtain regulatory approval in foreign jurisdictions would prevent us from marketing our

products internationally.

We intend to have our product candidates marketed outside the U.S. In furtherance of this objective, we
have entered into relationships with Cadila in India and LGLS in South Korea. In order to market our
products in the European Union, India, Asia and many other non-U.S. jurisdictions, we must obtain separate
regulatory approvals and comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements. The approval procedure
varies among countries and can involve additional testing and data review. The time required to obtain foreign
regulatory approval may differ from that required to obtain FDA approval. The foreign regulatory approval
process may include all of the risks associated with obtaining FDA approval. We may not obtain foreign
regulatory approvals on a timely basis, if at all. Approval by a regulatory agency, such as the FDA, does not
ensure approval by any other regulatory agencies, for example in other foreign countries. However, a failure
or delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one jurisdiction may have a negative effect on the regulatory
approval process in other jurisdictions,
including approval by the FDA. The failure to obtain regulatory
approval in foreign jurisdictions could harm our business.

Even if regulatory approval is received for our product candidates, the later discovery of previously
unknown problems with a product, manufacturer or facility may result in restrictions, including withdrawal
of the product from the market.

Even if a product gains regulatory approval, such approval is likely to limit the indicated uses for which
it may be marketed, and the product and the manufacturer of the product will be subject to continuing
regulatory review, including adverse event reporting requirements and the FDA’s general prohibition against
promoting products for unapproved uses. Failure to comply with any post-approval requirements can, among
other things, result in warning letters, product seizures, recalls, substantial fines, injunctions, suspensions or
revocations of marketing licenses, operating restrictions and criminal prosecutions. Any of these enforcement
actions, any unanticipated changes in existing regulatory requirements or the adoption of new requirements, or
any safety issues that arise with any approved products, could adversely affect our ability to market products
and generate revenue and thus adversely affect our ability to continue our business.

We also may be restricted or prohibited from marketing or manufacturing a product, even after obtaining
product approval,
if previously unknown problems with the product or its manufacture are subsequently
discovered and we cannot provide assurance that newly discovered or developed safety issues will not arise
following any regulatory approval. With the use of any vaccine by a wide patient population, serious adverse
events may occur from time to time that initially do not appear to relate to the vaccine itself, and only if the
specific event occurs with some regularity over a period of time does the vaccine become suspect as having a
causal relationship to the adverse event. Any safety issues could cause us to suspend or cease marketing of
our approved products, possibly subject us to substantial liabilities, and adversely affect our ability to generate
revenue and our financial condition.

Because we are subject to environmental, health and safety laws, we may be unable to conduct our

business in the most advantageous manner.

We are subject

to various laws and regulations relating to safe working conditions,

laboratory and
manufacturing practices, the experimental use of animals, emissions and wastewater discharges, and the use
and disposal of hazardous or potentially hazardous substances used in connection with our research, including
infectious disease agents. We also cannot accurately predict the extent of regulations that might result from
any future legislative or administrative action. Any of these laws or regulations could cause us to incur
additional expense or restrict our operations.

Our facilities in Maryland are subject to various local, state and federal laws and regulations relating to
safe working conditions, laboratory and manufacturing practices, the experimental use of animals and the use
including chemicals, microorganisms and
and disposal of hazardous or potentially hazardous substances,
various hazardous compounds used in connection with our research and development activities. In the U.S.,

26

these laws include the Occupational Safety and Health Act, the Toxic Test Substances Control Act and the
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. We cannot eliminate the risk of accidental contamination or
laws and regulations govern the use,
discharge or injury from these materials. Federal, state, and local
manufacture, storage, handling and disposal of these materials. We could be subject to civil damages in the
event of an improper or unauthorized release of, or exposure of individuals to, these hazardous materials. In
addition, claimants may sue us for injury or contamination that results from our use or the use by third-parties
of these materials, and our liability may exceed our total assets. Compliance with environmental laws and
regulations may be expensive, and current or future environmental regulations may impair our research,
development or production efforts.

Although we have general liability insurance, these policies contain exclusions from insurance against
claims arising from pollution from chemical or pollution from conditions arising from our operations. Our
collaborators are working with these types of hazardous materials in connection with our collaborations. In the
event of a lawsuit or investigation, we could be held responsible for any injury we or our collaborators cause
to persons or property by exposure to, or release of, any hazardous materials. However, we believe that we
are currently in compliance with all applicable environmental and occupational health and safety regulations.

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RISKS

Our success depends on our ability to maintain the proprietary nature of our technology.

Our success in large part depends on our ability to maintain the proprietary nature of our technology and
other trade secrets. To do so, we must prosecute and maintain existing patents, obtain new patents and pursue
trade secret and other intellectual property protection. We also must operate without infringing the proprietary
rights of third-parties or allowing third-parties to infringe our rights. We currently have or have rights to over
115 U.S. patents and corresponding foreign patents and patent applications covering our technologies.
However, patent issues relating to pharmaceuticals and biologics involve complex legal, scientific and factual
questions. To date, no consistent policy has emerged regarding the breadth of biotechnology patent claims that
are granted by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office or enforced by the federal courts. Therefore, we do not
know whether our patent applications will result in the issuance of patents, or that any patents issued to us
will provide us with any competitive advantage. We also cannot be sure that we will develop additional
proprietary products that are patentable. Furthermore, there is a risk that others will independently develop or
duplicate similar technology or products or circumvent the patents issued to us.

There is a risk that third-parties may challenge our existing patents or claim that we are infringing their
patents or proprietary rights. We could incur substantial costs in defending patent infringement suits or in
filing suits against others to have their patents declared invalid or claim infringement. It is also possible that
we may be required to obtain licenses from third-parties to avoid infringing third-party patents or other
proprietary rights. We cannot be sure that such third-party licenses would be available to us on acceptable
terms, if at all. If we are unable to obtain required third-party licenses, we may be delayed in or prohibited
from developing, manufacturing or selling products requiring such licenses.

Although our patent filings include claims covering various features of our products and product
candidates, including composition, methods of manufacture and use, our patents do not provide us with
complete protection against the development of competing products. Some of our know-how and technology
is not patentable. To protect our proprietary rights in unpatentable intellectual property and trade secrets, we
require employees, consultants, advisors and collaborators to enter into confidentiality agreements. These
agreements may not provide meaningful protection for our trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary
information.

If we infringe or are alleged to infringe the intellectual property rights of third-parties, it will adversely

affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our research, development and commercialization activities, including any product candidates or products
resulting from these activities, may infringe or be claimed to infringe patents owned by third-parties and to
which we do not hold licenses or other rights. There may be rights we are not aware of, including applications
that have been filed but not published that, when issued, could be asserted against us. These third-parties
could bring claims against us, and that would cause us to incur substantial expenses and, if successful against

27

us, could cause us to pay substantial damages. Further, if a patent infringement suit were brought against us,
we could be forced to stop or delay research, development, manufacturing or sales of the product or biologic
drug candidate that is the subject of the suit.

As a result of patent infringement claims, or in order to avoid potential claims, we may choose or be
required to seek a license from the third-party. These licenses may not be available on acceptable terms, or at
all. Even if we are able to obtain a license, the license would likely obligate us to pay license fees or royalties
or both, and the rights granted to us might be non-exclusive, which could result in our competitors gaining
access to the same intellectual property. Ultimately, we could be prevented from commercializing a product,
or be forced to cease some aspect of our business operations, if, as a result of actual or threatened patent
infringement claims, we are unable to enter into licenses on acceptable terms. All of the issues described
above could also impact our collaborators, which would also impact the success of the collaboration and
therefore us.

There has been substantial

litigation and other proceedings regarding patent and other intellectual
property rights in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries. In addition to infringement claims against
us, we may become a party to other patent litigation and other proceedings, including interference proceedings
declared by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and opposition proceedings in the European Patent Office,
regarding intellectual property rights with respect to our products and technology.

We may become involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents or the patents of our

collaborators or licensors, which could be expensive and time-consuming.

Competitors may infringe our patents or the patents of our collaborators or licensors. As a result, we may
be required to file infringement claims to counter infringement for unauthorized use. This can be expensive,
particularly for a company of our size, and time-consuming. In addition, in an infringement proceeding, a
court may decide that a patent of ours is not valid or is unenforceable, or may refuse to stop the other party
from using the technology at issue on the grounds that our patents do not cover its technology. An adverse
determination of any litigation or defense proceeding could put one or more of our patents at risk of being
invalidated or interpreted narrowly and could put our patent applications at the risk of not issuing.

Interference proceedings brought by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office may be necessary to determine
the priority of inventions with respect to our patent applications or those of our collaborators or licensors.
Litigation or interference proceedings may fail and, even if successful, may result in substantial costs and
distraction to our management. We may not be able, alone or with our collaborators and licensors, to prevent
misappropriation of our proprietary rights, particularly in countries where the laws may not protect such rights
as fully as in the U.S.

there is a risk that some of our confidential

Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual
property litigation,
information could be compromised by
disclosure during this type of litigation. In addition, during the course of this kind of litigation, there could be
public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments.
the market price for our common stock could be
If investors perceive these results to be negative,
significantly harmed.

We may need to license intellectual property from third-parties and, if our right to use the intellectual
property we license is affected, our ability to develop and commercialize our product candidates may
be harmed.

We expect that we will need to license intellectual property from third-parties in the future and that these
licenses will be material to our business. We will not own the patents or patent applications that underlie these
licenses, and we will not control the enforcement of the patents. We will rely upon our licensors to properly
prosecute and file those patent applications and prevent infringement of those patents.

Our license agreement with Wyeth, which gives us rights to a family of patent applications covering VLP
technology for use in human vaccines in certain fields of use, is non-exclusive. These applications are very
significant to our business. If each milestone is achieved for any particular product candidate, we would be
obligated to pay an aggregate of $14 million to Wyeth for each product candidate developed and

28

commercialized under the agreement. Achievement of each milestone is subject to many risks, including those
described in these Risk Factors. Annual license maintenance fees under the Wyeth agreement aggregate to
$0.2 million per year.

While many of the licenses under which we have rights provide us with rights in specified fields, the
scope of our rights under these and other licenses may be subject to dispute by our licensors or third-parties.
In addition, our rights to use these technologies and practice the inventions claimed in the licensed patents and
patent applications are subject to our licensors abiding by the terms of those licenses and not terminating
them. Any of our licenses may be terminated by the licensor if we are in breach of a term or condition of the
license agreement, or in certain other circumstances.

Our product candidates and potential product candidates will require several components that may each
be the subject of a license agreement. The cumulative license fees and royalties for these components may
make the commercialization of these product candidates uneconomical.

If patent laws or the interpretation of patent laws change, our competitors may be able to develop and

commercialize our discoveries.

Important legal issues remain to be resolved as to the extent and scope of available patent protection for
biopharmaceutical products and processes in the U.S. and other important markets outside the U.S., such as
Europe and Japan. Foreign markets may not provide the same level of patent protection as provided under the
U.S. patent system. Litigation or administrative proceedings may be necessary to determine the validity and
scope of certain of our and others’ proprietary rights. Any such litigation or proceeding may result in a
significant commitment of resources in the future and could force us to do one or more of the following:
cease selling or using any of our products that incorporate the challenged intellectual property, which would
adversely affect our revenue; obtain a license from the holder of the intellectual property right alleged to have
been infringed, which license may not be available on reasonable terms, if at all; and redesign our products to
avoid infringing the intellectual property rights of third-parties, which may be time-consuming or impossible
to do. In addition, changes in, or different interpretations of, patent laws in the U.S. and other countries may
result in patent laws that allow others to use our discoveries or develop and commercialize our products. We
cannot provide assurance that the patents we obtain or the unpatented technology we hold will afford us
significant commercial protection.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON STOCK AND ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE

Because our stock price has been and will likely continue to be highly volatile, the market price of our

common stock may be lower or more volatile than expected.

Our

stock price has been highly volatile. The stock market

for
biopharmaceutical companies in particular have experienced extreme volatility that has often been unrelated to
the operating performance of particular companies. From January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2011, the
closing sale price of our common stock has been as low as $1.18 per share and as high as $2.96 per share.
The market price of our common stock may be influenced by many factors, including:

in general and the market

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

future announcements about our Company or our collaborators or competitors, including the results
of testing, technological innovations or new commercial products;

clinical trial results;

depletion of our cash reserves;

sale of equity securities or issuance of additional debt;

announcement by us of significant strategic partnerships, collaborations,
commitments or acquisitions;

joint ventures, capital

changes in government regulations;

developments in our relationships with our collaboration partners;

announcements relating to health care reform and reimbursement levels for new vaccines;

29

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

sales of substantial amounts of our stock by existing stockholders (including stock by insiders or
5% stockholders);

development, spread or new announcements related to pandemic influenza;

litigation;

public concern as to the safety of our products;

significant set-backs or concerns with the industry or the market as a whole;

regulatory inquiries, reviews and potential action, including from the FDA or the Securities and
Exchange Commission; and

the other factors described in this Risk Factors section.

The stock market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have particularly affected
the market price for many emerging and biopharmaceutical companies. These fluctuations have often been
unrelated to the operating performance of these companies. These broad market fluctuations may cause the
market price of our common stock to be lower or more volatile than expected.

We have never paid dividends on our capital stock, and we do not anticipate paying any such

dividends in the foreseeable future.

We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock. We currently anticipate that we will retain all
of our earnings for use in the development of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in
the foreseeable future. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock would be the only source
of gain for stockholders until dividends are paid, if at all.

Provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation and By-laws, Delaware law, and our Shareholder Rights
Plan could delay or prevent the acquisition of the Company, even if such acquisition would be beneficial to
stockholders, and could impede changes in our Board.

Our organizational documents could hamper a third-party’s attempt to acquire, or discourage a third-party
from attempting to acquire control of, the Company. We also have adopted a shareholder rights plan, or
‘‘poison pill,’’ that empowers our Board to delay or negotiate, and thereby possibly thwart, any tender offer or
takeover attempt the Board opposes, and we expect to extend, amend, or replace this plan during the coming
year. Stockholders who wish to participate in these transactions may not have the opportunity to do so. These
provisions also could limit the price investors are willing to pay in the future for our securities and make it
more difficult to change the composition of our Board in any one year. These provisions include the right of
the Board to issue preferred stock with rights senior to those of common stock without any further vote or
action by stockholders, the existence of a staggered Board with three classes of directors serving staggered
three-year terms and advance notice requirements for stockholders to nominate directors and make proposals.

The Company also is afforded the protections of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law,
which will prevent us from engaging in a business combination with a person who acquires at least 15% of
our common stock for a period of three years from the date such person acquired such common stock, unless
advance board or stockholder approval was obtained.

Any delay or prevention of a change of control transaction or changes in our Board of Director or
the completion of a transaction in which our

management could deter potential acquirers or prevent
stockholders could receive a substantial premium over the then current market price for their shares.

30

Item 2. PROPERTIES

We lease approximately 51,200 square feet

in Rockville, Maryland, which serves as our corporate
headquarters and includes administrative offices, vaccine research and development, as well as a
manufacturing facility. In 2011, we entered into a long-term lease arrangement for 74,000 square feet of
manufacturing,
laboratory and office space in two facilities in Gaithersburg, MD. We continue to lease
approximately 32,900 square feet of administrative office and research and development space at our former
corporate headquarters in Malvern, Pennsylvania, all of which is currently subleased. A summary of our
current facilities is set forth below.

Property
Location
Rockville, MD . . . . . . .

Approximate
Square Footage
51,200

Gaithersburg, MD . . . . .

74,000

Malvern, PA . . . . . . . .
Total square footage . . .
Malvern, PA sublease . .
Net square footage . . . .

32,900
158,100
(32,900)
125,200

Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

and vaccine

corporate headquarters

Current
development and manufacturing facility
Future
and
development and manufacturing facility
Former corporate headquarters and research and development

headquarters

corporate

research

vaccine

research and

and

In September 2011, we settled the lawsuits we had initiated in 2010 against former Novavax Directors,
Mitchell Kelly and Denis O’Donnell; these settlements had no significant impact on our financial position or
results of operations.

31

PART II

Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER
MATTERS

Our common stock trades on The NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol ‘‘NVAX.’’ The following
table sets forth the range of high and low closing sale prices for our common stock as reported on The
NASDAQ Global Market for each quarter in the two most recent years:

Quarter Ended
December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
September 30, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
June 30, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
March 31, 2011. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
December 31, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
September 30, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
June 30, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
March 31, 2010. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

High
$1.71
$2.13
$2.61
$2.96
$2.67
$2.34
$2.97
$3.02

Low
$1.25
$1.18
$1.97
$2.15
$2.11
$2.01
$2.17
$2.05

On March 8, 2012, the last sale price reported on The NASDAQ Global Market for our common stock
was $1.31. Our common stock was held by approximately 485 stockholders of record as of March 8, 2012,
one of which is Cede & Co., a nominee for Depository Trust Company (or DTC). All of the shares of
common stock held by brokerage firms, banks and other financial institutions as nominees for beneficial
owners are deposited into participant accounts at DTC, and are therefore considered to be held of record by
Cede & Co. as one stockholder. We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock since our
inception. We do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under our Equity Compensation Plans

Information regarding our equity compensation plans, including both stockholder approved plans and

non-stockholder approved plans, is included in Item 12 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

32

The graph below compares the cumulative total stockholders return on our common stock for the last five
fiscal years with the cumulative total
return on the NASDAQ Composite Index and the NASDAQ
Pharmaceutical Index (which includes Novavax) over the same period, assuming the investment of $100 in
our common stock, the NASDAQ Composite Index and the NASDAQ Pharmaceutical Index on December 31,
2006, and reinvestments of all dividends.

COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among Novavax, Inc., the NASDAQ Composite Index
and the NASDAQ Pharmaceutical Index

$150

$100

$50

$0

12/06

12/07

12/08

12/09

12/10

12/11

Novavax, Inc.

NASDAQ Composite

NASDAQ Pharmaceutical

*

$100 invested on 12/31/06 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends. Fiscal year ending
December 31.

Value of $100 invested on December 31, 2006 in stock or index, including reinvestment of dividends, for

fiscal years ended December 31:

Novavax, Inc.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
NASDAQ Composite Index . . . . .
NASDAQ Pharmaceutical Index . .

12/31/06
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00

12/31/07
$ 81.22
$110.38
$ 95.32

12/31/08
$46.10
$65.58
$90.11

12/31/09
$64.88
$95.27
$99.36

12/31/10
$ 59.27
$112.22
$105.18

12/31/11
$ 30.73
$110.58
$114.32

This graph is not ‘‘soliciting material,’’ is not deemed ‘‘filed’’ with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference in any filing of the Company under the Securities Act
of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of
any general incorporation language in any such filing.

33

Item 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table sets forth selected financial data for each of the years in the five-year period ended
December 31, 2011, which has been derived from our audited financial statements. The information below
should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes thereto and ‘‘Management’s Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations’’ included elsewhere in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K. These historical results are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for
future periods.

Statements of Operations Data:
Revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss from continuing operations . . . . . . . .
Income (loss) from discontinued operations .
Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Basic and diluted net loss per share:
Loss per share from continuing operations . .
Income (loss) per share from discontinued

operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Basic and diluted net loss per share . . . . . .
Weighted average shares used in computing
basic and diluted net loss per share . . . . .

2011

For The Years Ended December 31,
2010
2008
2009
(in thousands, except per share amounts)

2007

$ 14,688
(19,364)
—
$ (19,364)

$

343
(35,708)
—
$ (35,708)

$
325
(40,346)
—
$(40,346)

$ 1,064
(34,784)
273
$(34,511)

$ 1,513
(28,590)
(6,175)
$(34,765)

$

(0.17)

$

(0.34)

$

(0.47)

$

(0.51)

$

(0.47)

—
(0.17)

$

—
(0.34)

—
(0.47)

$

$

—
(0.51)

$

(0.10)
(0.57)

$

113,610

104,768

85,555

68,174

61,101

2011

2010

As of December 31,
2009
(in thousands)

2008

2007

Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and short-term investments . . . . . . . . $ 18,309
26,109
Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Working capital(1)
18,530
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
66,576
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
300
Long-term debt, less current portion . . . . . .
(329,656)
Accumulated deficit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
53,849
Total stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 31,676
33,337
23,071
74,844
320
(310,292)
59,050

$ 42,950
44,503
36,476
85,605
406
(274,584)
69,952

$ 33,900
35,096
7,379
76,625
480
(234,238)
42,948

$ 46,489
49,016
42,810
91,291
21,629
(199,727)
63,065

(1) Working capital is computed as the excess of current assets over current liabilities.

34

Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Certain statements contained or incorporated by reference herein constitute forward-looking statements. In
some cases, these statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as ‘‘expect(s),’’
‘‘intends,’’ ‘‘plans,’’ ‘‘seeks,’’ ‘‘estimates,’’ ‘‘could,’’ ‘‘should,’’ ‘‘feel(s),’’ ‘‘believe(s),’’ ‘‘will,’’ ‘‘would,’’
‘‘may,’’ ‘‘can,’’ ‘‘anticipate(s),’’ ‘‘potential’’ and similar expressions or the negative of these terms. Such
forward-looking statements are subject
results,
performance or achievements of the Company, or industry results,
to be materially different from those
expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

to risks and uncertainties that may cause the actual

Forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K include, without limitation, statements

regarding:

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

potential benefits, regulatory approval and commercialization of our vaccine candidates;

our expectation that we will have adequate capital resources available to operate at planned levels
for at least the next twelve months;

our expected 2012 capital expenditures;

our expectations for future revenue under the contract with HHS BARDA and funding requirements
and capital
Issuance Sales
Agreement;

including possible proceeds from our At Market

raising activity,

our expectations on financial or business performance, conditions or strategies and other financial
and business matters, including expectations regarding operating expenses, use of cash, and the
fluctuations in expenses and capital requirements associated with pre-clinical studies, clinical trials
and other research and development activities;

our expectations on clinical development and anticipated milestones, including under the contract
with HHS BARDA and our planned clinical trials;

our expectations that our product candidates will prove to be safe and effective;

our expectations that our multivalent seasonal influenza VLP vaccine could potentially address an
unmet medical need in older adults or children;

our expectations that our RSV vaccine could potentially address unmet medical needs;

our expectation that we will utilize the amount of services that is required to be provided by Cadila
Pharmaceuticals Limited (Cadila) under the master services agreement;

our expectations regarding payments to Wyeth;

our expectations for the use of results from our Pandemic H1N1 clinical trial in Mexico to support
the development of our influenza vaccines in other countries, including the U.S.;

the impact of new accounting pronouncements; and

our expectations concerning payments under existing license agreements.

Factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking
statements or historical experience include, but are not limited to, those described under Item 1A. Risk Factors
of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The Company assumes no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements, except as required
by law. We caution readers not to place considerable reliance on the forward-looking statements contained in
this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

35

Overview

Novavax, Inc., a Delaware corporation (‘‘Novavax,’’ the ‘‘Company,’’ ‘‘we,’’ or ‘‘us’’), was incorporated
in 1987, and is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing novel recombinant vaccines
to address a broad range of infectious diseases. Our goal is to become a profitable vaccine company that is
aggressively driving towards development, licensure and commercialization of important vaccines worldwide.

Our technology platform is based on proprietary recombinant vaccine technology that includes VLPs and
recombinant nanoparticle vaccines combined with a single-use bioprocessing production system. Our vaccine
candidates are genetically engineered three-dimensional nanostructures that
incorporate immunologically
important recombinant proteins. Our product pipeline targets a variety of infectious diseases and our vaccine
candidates are currently in or have completed clinical trials that target pandemic influenza (H5N1), seasonal
influenza and RSV.

CPL Biologicals Private Limited (the JV), our joint venture formed in 2009 between us and Cadila, of
which 20% is owned by us and 80% is owned by Cadila. The JV will develop and manufacture our pandemic
and seasonal influenza vaccine candidates and Cadila’s biogeneric products and other diagnostic products for
the territory of India. In June 2010, the JV opened its newly constructed state-of-the-art manufacturing facility,
100% funded by Cadila, to be used to produce pandemic and seasonal influenza vaccines, as well as other
vaccine candidates. The JV is actively developing a rabies vaccine candidate that was genetically engineered
by Novavax; it recently completed initial pre-clinical immunogenicity studies on this vaccine candidate and is
progressing with pre-clinical
the JV, we account for our
toxicology studies. Because we do not control
investment using the equity method. Since the carrying value of our contribution was nominal and there is no
guarantee or commitment to provide future funding, we have not recorded nor do we expect to record losses
related to this investment in the future.

A current summary of our significant research and development programs and status of development

follows:

Program

Pandemic Influenza (H1N1)
Pandemic Influenza (H5N1)
Seasonal Influenza
Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)
Rabies (through JV)

Development Phase

Phase II (ended)
Phase II
Phase II
Phase I
Pre-clinical

HHS BARDA Contract Award for Recombinant Influenza Vaccines

In February 2011, we were awarded a contract from HHS BARDA valued at $97 million for the first
36 month base-period, with an HHS BARDA option for an additional period of 24 months valued at
$82 million, for a total contract value of up to $179 million. The HHS BARDA contract award provides
significant funding for our ongoing clinical development and product scale-up of both our seasonal and
pandemic influenza vaccine candidates. This is a cost-plus-fixed-fee contract in which HHS BARDA will
reimburse us for direct contract costs incurred plus allowable indirect costs and a fee earned in the further
development of our seasonal and pandemic (H5N1) influenza vaccines. During 2011, we recognized revenue
of approximately $15 million, made significant progress in product characterization and production scale-up
and are progressing forward with our multi-year clinical development program.

Pandemic Influenza (H1N1)

In 2009 and 2010, we dedicated significant resources to demonstrate our ability to develop a recombinant
VLP vaccine against this latest pandemic influenza strain. We produced a non-cGMP H1N1 VLP vaccine
candidate within 3 weeks after
the novel H1N1 virus was announced and
manufactured a cGMP vaccine candidate within 11 weeks of the announcement. We conducted a Phase II
clinical trial in Mexico, in collaboration with Laboratorio Avi-Mex S.A. de C.V. and GE Healthcare; and
published the final data results last year and presented at the World Health Organization (WHO) Meeting for
the Evaluation of Pandemic Influenza Vaccines in Clinical Trials. Our results showed that our H1N1 VLP
vaccine exceeded the immunogenicity criteria for seasonal influenza vaccine licensure at all dose levels,

the genetic sequence of

36

including the lowest 5µg dose and that a single administration of the VLP vaccine induced high levels of HAI
titers in subjects without pre-existing detectable immunity to H1N1 influenza. Although H1N1 influenza is
no longer considered a pandemic and is being addressed as an active strain in the determination of ongoing
seasonal influenza strains, we nevertheless expect that the data from our H1N1 clinical trials will be used
to support our pandemic (H5N1) and seasonal
influenza VLP vaccine programs in the U.S. and in
other countries.

Pandemic Influenza (H5N1)

We have made significant progress in the development of our vaccine that targets the H5N1 influenza
strain. In 2007, we released results from an important pre-clinical study in which ferrets that received our
H5N1 vaccine candidate were protected from a lethal challenge of the H5N1 virus. After filing an IND, we
initiated a Phase I/IIa clinical trial. We released interim data from the first portion of this clinical trial in
December 2007. These interim results demonstrated that our pandemic influenza vaccine can generate a
protective immune response. We conducted the second portion of the Phase I/IIa trial in 2008 to gather
additional subject immunogenicity and safety data and determine a final dose through the completion of this
clinical trial. In August 2008, we reported favorable results from this clinical trial, which demonstrated strong
neutralizing antibody titers across all three doses tested. The vaccine was well-tolerated at all dose levels as
compared with placebo, and no serious adverse events were reported. The vaccine also induced robust HAI
responses, which have been shown to be important for protection against influenza disease. In conjunction
with our HHS BARDA contract, in 2012, we expect to launch two Phase I trials of our vaccine candidate in
combination with several alternative adjuvant candidates. These trials will evaluate the safety and tolerability
of the vaccines in the presence and absence of adjuvants; the ability of VLP vaccine antigens with and
without adjuvants to generate antibody levels that fulfill the FDA’s criteria for accelerated approval, and the
ability of these vaccines to provide an expanded number of doses and possible cross-protection against other
virus strains to the U.S. population.

Seasonal Influenza

We are actively developing our VLP vaccine that targets the seasonal influenza virus. In April 2010, we
reported the final results of our Phase II trial in older adults (60 years of age or older) in a dose-ranging study
influenza VLP vaccine with a commercially available
comparing our seasonal
inactivated trivalent
the vaccine was both safe and
immunogenic against the 2009-2010 seasonal influenza virus strains in older adults. The CDC has indicated
that currently approved seasonal influenza vaccines may be suboptimally effective in preventing hospitalization
for pneumonia and influenza in older adults; however, we believe that some features of our seasonal influenza
VLP vaccine have the potential to offer improved efficacy.

influenza vaccine (TIV). The results showed that

(three strain)

trivalent

In 2012, we initiated a seasonal influenza Phase II dose-ranging trial using both trivalent and quadrivalent
influenza vaccine
(four strains) formulations. We developed a quadrivalent formulation of our seasonal
candidate as many influenza vaccine manufacturers move from trivalent
to quadrivalent formulations, an
industry move that has been acknowledged by WHO and the FDA. At the conclusion of the trial, we will
select the optimal quadrivalent dose and expect to initiate a dose-confirmatory Phase II trial in the second half
of 2012. A Phase III registration trial is expected to begin in late 2013.

Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV)

We have developed a recombinant nanoparticle vaccine to prevent RSV. In pre-clinical studies, we have
demonstrated positive results in models designed to test the safety and efficacy of our RSV vaccine candidate.
In December 2010, we initiated a blinded, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating Phase I trial to assess the safety
and tolerability of aluminum phosphate-adjuvanted and unadjuvanted formulations of our RSV vaccine
candidate. A secondary objective of the study was to evaluate total and neutralizing anti-RSV antibody
responses and assess the impact of the adjuvant. The study enrolled 150 healthy adults 18 to 49 years old who
were allocated to six cohorts that included four dose levels of vaccine. The primary safety findings were local
pain and tenderness at the site of injection, the majority of which were mild in nature with no dose-related
increase observed. There were no observed vaccine-related serious adverse events or trends for related
systemic side effects. The antibody response to the RSV F protein was significantly increased compared to

37

placebo (p<0.001) in all groups and increased by 19-fold in the highest-dose group at day 60. A significant
dose-response pattern was observed. High rates of seroconversion were seen at all doses including a rate of
100% at the highest-dose-adjuvant group. In 2012, we expect to initiate two separate dose-ranging Phase II
trials in older adults and women of child bearing age.

License Agreement with LGLS

In February 2011, we entered into a licensing agreement with LGLS that allows LGLS to use our VLP
technology to develop and commercially sell our influenza vaccines in South Korea and certain other
emerging-market countries. LGLS received an exclusive license to our influenza VLP technology in South
Korea and a non-exclusive license in the other specified countries. At its own cost, LGLS is responsible for
funding its clinical development of the influenza VLP vaccines and completing a manufacturing facility in
South Korea. We received an upfront payment and may receive reimbursements of certain development and
product costs and royalty payments between 10 and 20% from LGLS’s future commercial sales of influenza
VLP vaccines.

At Market Sales

In March 2010, we entered into an At Market Issuance Sales Agreement, under which we could sell an
aggregate of $50 million in gross proceeds of our common stock. Our Board of Directors has authorized the
sale of up to 25 million shares of our common stock pursuant to the At Market Issuance Sales Agreement.
During 2011, we sold 6,001,841 shares of our common stock at a range of $1.25-$2.75 and received net
proceeds of $11.8 million (with $0.8 million received in early 2012) under the At Market Issuance Sales
Agreement. Since entering into the At Market Issuance Sales Agreement through March 8, 2012, we have sold
21,053,564 shares of our common stock and received gross proceeds of $42.1 million.

Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our
financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in
the U.S.

The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities and equity and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date
of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period.
These estimates, particularly estimates relating to accounting for revenue, the valuation of our short-term
investments, stock-based compensation, long-lived assets, goodwill and valuation of our warrants and net
deferred tax assets have a material impact on our financial statements and are discussed in detail throughout
our analysis of the results of operations discussed below.

We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe are
reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the
carrying value of assets, liabilities and equity that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results
and outcomes could differ from these estimates and assumptions.

Revenue

We currently derive revenue from a cost-plus-fixed-fee contract in which HHS BARDA will reimburse us
for direct contract costs incurred plus allowable indirect costs and a fee earned in the further development of
our seasonal and pandemic (H5N1) influenza vaccines. Revenue on this cost-plus-fixed-fee contract
is
recognized as costs are incurred plus allowable indirect costs and the fee earned. Billings under the contract
are based on approved provisional indirect billing rates, which permit recovery of fringe benefits, overhead
and general and administrative expenses not exceeding certain limits. These indirect rates will be subject to
audit by HHS BARDA on an annual basis. When the final determination of the allowable costs for any year
has been made, revenue and billings may be adjusted accordingly.

38

Short-Term Investments

Our short-term investments are classified as available-for-sale securities and are carried at fair value.
Unrealized gains and losses on these securities, if determined to be temporary, are included in accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity. We assess the recoverability of our short-term
investments and, if an impairment is indicated, we measure the amount of such impairment by comparing the
fair value to the carrying value. Other-than-temporary impairments are included in the statements of
operations. In 2007, we invested in auction rate securities as part of our cash management program. Since that
time, uncertainties in the credit markets have prevented us from liquidating certain holdings of auction rate
securities as the amount of securities submitted for sale during the auction has exceeded the amount of
purchase orders. Although an event of an auction failure does not necessarily mean that a security is impaired,
we consider various factors to assess the fair value and the classification of the securities as short-term
investments. Fair value was determined with the assistance of an independent valuation firm using two
valuation methods — a discounted cash flow method and a market comparable method. Certain factors used in
these methods include, but are not necessarily limited to, comparable securities traded on secondary markets,
timing of the failed auction, specific security auction history, quality of underlying collateral, rating of the
security and the bond insurer, our ability and intent to retain the securities for a period of time to allow for
anticipated recovery in the market value and other factors. We recorded an other-than-temporary impairment
charge of $1.3 million related to these securities in 2009, which was partially offset by realized gains of
$0.8 million relating to redemptions of several auction rate securities. Since that time, changes in the fair
value of our auction rate securities have been included in other comprehensive income on the balance sheets.
At December 31, 2011, we have recorded $0.8 million in unrealized gains on the auction rate securities held
by us at year-end.

Stock-Based Compensation

We account for our stock-based compensation in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification
(ASC) 718, Compensation-Stock Compensation. This standard requires us to measure the cost of employee
services received in exchange for equity share options granted based on the grant-date fair value of the
options. Employee stock-based compensation is estimated at the date of grant based on the award’s fair value
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and is recognized as an expense on a straight-line basis over the
requisite service period for those awards expected to vest. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires
the use of certain assumptions, the most significant of which are our estimates of the expected volatility of the
market price of our common stock and the expected term of the award. Our estimate of the expected volatility
is based on historical volatility over the look-back period corresponding to the expected term. The expected
term represents the period during which our stock-based awards are expected to be outstanding. In 2011, we
estimated this amount based on historical experience of similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual
terms of the awards, vesting requirements, and expectation of future employee behavior, including post-vesting
exercise and forfeiture history. We review our valuation assumptions at each grant date and, as a result, our
assumptions in future periods may change. Also, the accounting estimate of stock-based compensation expense
is reasonably likely to change from period to period as further stock options are granted and adjustments are
made for stock option cancellations.

Impairments of Long-Lived Assets

for

We account

the impairment of

long-lived assets by performing a periodic evaluation of

the
recoverability of the carrying value of long-lived assets and whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. Examples of events or changes in
circumstances that indicate that the recoverability of the carrying value of an asset should be assessed include,
but are not limited to, the following: a significant decrease in the market value of an asset, a significant
change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used, a significant physical change in an asset, a
significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of an asset, an
adverse action or assessment by a regulator, an accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount
originally expected to acquire or construct an asset, a current period operating or cash flow loss combined
with a history of operating or cash flow losses and/or a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing
losses associated with an asset used for the purpose of producing revenue. We consider historical performance
and anticipated future results in our evaluation of potential impairment. Accordingly, when indicators of

39

impairment are present, we evaluate the carrying value of these assets in relation to the operating performance
of the business and future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of these assets. Impairment
losses are recognized when the sum of expected future cash flows is less than the assets’ carrying value.

Goodwill

is not amortized, but

Goodwill originally resulted from a business acquisition in 2000. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed
were recorded at their fair values; the excess of the purchase price over the identifiable net assets acquired is
recorded as goodwill. Goodwill
tests annually, or more
frequently should indicators of impairment arise. We utilize the market approach and, if considered necessary,
the income approach to determine if we have an impairment of our goodwill. The market approach serves as
the primary approach and is based on market value of invested capital. The concluded fair value significantly
exceeded the carrying value of our goodwill at December 31, 2011 and 2010. The income approach is used as
a confirming look to the market approach. Goodwill impairment is deemed to exist if the carrying value of a
reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, which we test annually at December 31.

to impairment

is subject

Given the current economic conditions and the uncertainties regarding their impact on us, there can be no
assurance that the estimates and assumptions made for purposes of our goodwill impairment testing will prove
to be accurate predictions of the future, or that any change in the assumptions or the current economic
conditions will not trigger more frequently than on an annual basis. If our assumptions are not achieved
or economic conditions deteriorate further, we may be required to record goodwill impairment charges in
future periods.

Warrant Accounting

We account for warrants in accordance with applicable accounting guidance in ASC 815, Derivatives and
Hedging, as derivative liabilities. As such, warrants have been classified as a non-current liability in the
Company’s statements of operations. In compliance with applicable accounting standards, registered warrants
that require the issuance of registered shares upon exercise and do not sufficiently preclude an implied right to
cash settlement are accounted for as derivative liabilities. We use the Monte Carlo Simulation model to
determine the fair value of the warrants. As a result,
the valuation of warrants is subjective, and the
option-pricing model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected stock price
volatility and probability of a fundamental
transaction (a strategic merger or sale). Changes in these
assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate. We could, at any point in time, ultimately incur
amounts significantly different than the carrying value.

Income Taxes

We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for expected future tax consequences of temporary
differences between the carrying amounts and tax basis of assets and liabilities. Income tax receivables and
liabilities, and deferred tax assets and liabilities, are recognized based on the amounts that more likely than
not would be sustained upon ultimate settlement with taxing authorities.

Developing our provision for income taxes and analyzing our tax position requires significant judgment
and knowledge of federal and state income tax laws, regulations and strategies, including the determination of
deferred tax assets and liabilities and any valuation allowances that may be required for deferred tax assets.

We assess the likelihood of realizing our deferred tax assets to determine whether an income tax
valuation allowance is required. Based on such evidence that can be objectively verified, we determine
whether it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the deferred tax assets will be realized. The main
factors that we consider include: cumulative losses in recent years; income/losses expected in future years; the
applicable statute of limitations; and potential
limitations on available net operating loss and tax credit
carryforwards.

Tax benefits associated with uncertain tax positions are recognized in the period in which one of the
following conditions is satisfied: (1) the more likely than not recognition threshold is satisfied; (2) the position
is ultimately settled through negotiation or litigation; or (3) the statute of limitations for the taxing authority to
examine and challenge the position has expired. Tax benefits associated with an uncertain tax position are
reversed in the period in which the more likely than not recognition threshold is no longer satisfied.

40

A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce net deferred tax assets to the amount
expected to be realized. We concluded that the realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon future
earnings, if any, the timing and amount of which are uncertain. Accordingly, our net deferred tax assets have
been fully offset by a valuation allowance.

Recent Accounting Guidance Not Yet Adopted

In June 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU) 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income (ASU 2011-05).
This guidance is intended to increase the prominence of other comprehensive income in financial statements
by presenting it in either a single-statement or two-statement approach. This ASU is effective for us beginning
January 1, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2011-05 will not have a material effect on our financial statements.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350):
Testing Goodwill for Impairment (ASU 2011-08), to give both public and non-public entities the option to
qualitatively determine whether they can bypass the two-step goodwill
test. Under the new
guidance, if an entity chooses to perform a qualitative assessment and determines that it is more likely than
not (a more than 50% likelihood) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, it
would then perform Step 1 of the annual goodwill impairment test in ASC 350-20 and, if necessary, proceed
to Step 2. Otherwise, no further evaluation would be necessary. The decision to perform a qualitative
assessment is made at the reporting unit level, and an entity with multiple reporting units may utilize a mix of
qualitative assessments and quantitative tests among its reporting units. The amended guidance is effective for
interim and annual goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011,
although early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2011-08 will not have a material effect on our
financial statements.

impairment

Results of Operations for Fiscal Years 2011, 2010 and 2009 (amounts in tables are presented in

thousands, except per share information)

The following is a discussion of the historical financial condition and results of operations of Novavax,
Inc. and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto set forth in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K. Additional information concerning factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those in our forward-looking statements is described under Item 1A. Risk Factors of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Revenue:

2011

2010

2009

Change 2010
to 2011

Change 2009
to 2010

Revenue:
Total contract revenue . . . . . . . . . . . .

$14,688

$343

$325

$14,345

$18

Revenue for 2011 was $14.7 million as compared to $0.3 million for 2010, an increase of $14.4 million.
Revenue for 2011 is comprised of services performed under the HHS BARDA contract that was awarded in
February 2011 and revenue for 2010 resulted from work under other government contracts. For 2012, we
expect to generate significant revenue as we continue to perform under the HHS BARDA contract.

Revenue for 2010 and 2009 was $0.3 million. Contract revenue resulted from work under other

government contracts.

Costs and Expenses:

2011

2010

2009

Change 2010
to 2011

Change 2009
to 2010

Costs and Expenses:
Cost of contract revenue . . . . . . . . . . .
Research and development . . . . . . . . .
General and administrative . . . . . . . . .
Total costs and expenses . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 7,003
17,885
11,379
$36,267

$ —
28,032
10,805
$38,837

$ —
25,780
11,928
$37,708

$ 7,003
(10,147)
574
$ (2,570)

$ —
2,252
(1,123)
$ 1,129

41

Cost of Contract Revenue

Cost of contract revenue increased to $7.0 million for 2011 due to the development work performed
under the HHS BARDA contract that was awarded in February 2011. These costs include direct costs of
salaries, laboratory supplies, consultants and subcontractors and other direct costs associated with our process
development, manufacturing, clinical, regulatory and quality assurance activities under research contracts. For
2012, we expect a significant increase in the cost of contract revenue as we plan to conduct multiple clinical
trials, including the manufacture of such clinical materials, under the HHS BARDA contract.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses decreased to $17.9 million for 2011 from $28.0 million for 2010, a
laboratory supplies, consultants and
decrease of $10.1 million, or 36%. These expenses include salaries,
subcontractors and other expenses associated with our process development, manufacturing, clinical,
regulatory and quality assurance activities for internally funded programs. In addition, indirect costs such as,
fringe benefits and overhead expenses, are also included in research and development expenses. The decrease
in research and development expenses was primarily due to work performed under the HHS BARDA contract
and as such, is being recorded as cost of contract revenue, and to a lesser extent lower outside-testing costs
(including outsourced clinical trial costs, sponsored research and consulting agreements) as a result of fewer
clinical trials on-going during 2011. For 2012, we expect a significant decrease in research and development
expenses due to our focus on the HHS BARDA contract, partially offset by two anticipated clinical trials in
RSV (an internally funded program at this time).

Research and development expenses increased to $28.0 million for 2010 from $25.8 million for 2009, an
increase of $2.2 million, or 9%. The increase in expense was primarily due to higher employee-related costs
of $1.4 million and increased depreciation expense of $0.2 million.

Costs and Expenses by Functional Area

We track our cost of contract revenue and research and development expenses by the type of costs
incurred in identifying, developing, manufacturing and testing vaccine candidates. We evaluate and prioritize
our activities according to functional area and therefore believe that project-by-project information would not
form a reasonable basis for disclosure to our investors. At December 31, 2011, we had 88 employees
dedicated to our research and development programs. Historically, we did not account for internal research
and development expenses by project, since our employees work time is spread across multiple programs and
our internal manufacturing clean-room facility produces multiple vaccine candidates.

The following summarizes our cost of contract revenue and research and development expenses by

functional area for the year ended December 31 (in millions).

Manufacturing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Vaccine Discovery . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Clinical & Regulatory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total cost of contract revenue and research and development expenses . . . . . . . .

2011
$14.7
3.2
7.0
$24.9

2010
$12.3
3.7
12.0
$28.0

We do not provide forward-looking estimates of costs and time to complete our research programs due to
the many uncertainties associated with vaccine development. As we obtain data from pre-clinical studies and
clinical trials, we may elect to discontinue or delay trials in order to focus our resources on more promising
vaccine candidates. Completion of trials may take several years or more, but the length of time can vary
substantially depending upon the phase, size of trial, primary and secondary endpoints and the intended use of
the vaccine candidate. The cost of clinical trials may vary significantly over the life of a project as a result of
a variety of factors, including:

•

•

•

•

the number of patients who participate in the trials;

the number of sites included in the trials;

if trial locations are domestic, international or both;

the time to enroll patients;

42

•

•

•

the duration of treatment and follow-up;

the safety and efficacy profile of the vaccine candidate; and

the cost and timing of, and the ability to secure, regulatory approvals.

As a result of these uncertainties, we are unable to determine with any significant degree of certainty the
duration and completion costs of our research and development projects or when, and to what extent, we will
generate future cash flows from our research projects.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses increased to $11.4 million in 2011 from $10.8 million for 2010, an
increase of $0.6 million, or 5%. The increase in expenses was primarily due to higher employee-related costs,
including severance expenses, partially offset by lower professional fees. For 2012, we expect a moderate
increase in general and administrative expenses primarily due to costs associated with our new manufacturing,
laboratory and office facility prior to our occupancy, which is expected to occur in 2012.

General and administrative expenses decreased to $10.8 million in 2010 from $11.9 million for 2009, a
decrease of $1.1 million, or 9%. The decrease in expenses was primarily due to lower professional fees of
$0.9 million.

Other Income (Expense):

Other Income (Expense):
Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment of short-term investments . .
Realized gains on short-term

2011

2010

2009

Change 2010
to 2011

Change 2009
to 2010

$ 136
(9)
26
—

$ 189
(9)
485
—

$

285
(786)
—
(1,338)

$ (53)
—
(459)
—

$ (96)
777
485
1,338

investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

—

—

848

—

(848)

Change in fair value of warrant

liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total other income (expense) . . . . . . . .

2,474
$2,627

1,671
$2,336

(1,972)
$(2,963)

803
$ 291

3,643
$5,299

We had total other income of $2.6 million for 2011 compared to total other income of $2.3 million for
2010, a change of $0.3 million. Other income decreased to less than $0.1 million for 2011 primarily resulting
from the receipt of grants under our application of qualifying therapeutic discovery project credits in 2010. We
are required to calculate the fair value of our warrant liability at each reporting period. For 2011, the change
in fair value of the warrant liability resulted in a $0.8 million increase in total other income (expense) as
compared to 2010. We will continue to mark the warrant liability to fair value at each reporting period until
the warrants are either exercised or otherwise expire.

We had total other income of $2.3 million for 2010 compared to total other expense of $3.0 million for
2009, a change of $5.3 million. Interest expense decreased $0.8 million to less than $0.1 million for 2010
from $0.8 million for 2009 as a result of our payment of the convertible notes in 2009. Other income
increased to $0.5 million for 2010 primarily resulting from the receipt of grants under our application of
qualifying therapeutic discovery project credits. In 2009, we recorded an impairment of $1.3 million relating
to our auction rate securities, which was partially offset by realized gains of $0.8 million relating to
redemptions of several auction rate securities. For 2010, the change in fair value of the warrant liability
resulted in a $3.6 million increase in total other income (expense) as compared to 2009.

43

Income Tax:

Income Tax:
Income tax expense (benefit) . . . . . . . .

2011

2010

$412

$(450)

2009

$—

Change 2010
to 2011

Change 2009
to 2010

$862

$(450)

In 2011, we incurred a foreign withholding tax related to a payment received in accordance with a
license agreement. In 2010, we recorded a deferred income tax benefit of $0.5 million related to a refundable
income tax credit received and grants received as a result of qualifying therapeutic discovery projects under
Internal Revenue Code Section 48D.

Net Loss:

Net Loss:
Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net loss per share . . . . . . . . .
Weighted average shares

2011

2010

2009

Change 2010
to 2011

Change 2009
to 2010

$ (19,364)
(0.17)
$

$ (35,708)
(0.34)
$

$(40,346)
(0.47)
$

$16,344
0.17
$

$ 4,638
0.13
$

outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . .

113,610

104,768

85,555

8,842

19,213

Net loss for 2011 was $19.4 million, or $0.17 per share, as compared to $35.7 million, or $0.34 per
share, for 2010, a decreased net loss of $16.3 million. The decreased net loss was primarily due to revenue
recognized under the HHS BARDA agreement, as well as lower research and development spending as a
result of fewer clinical trials on-going during 2011.

Net loss for 2010 was $35.7 million, or $0.34 per share, as compared to $40.3 million, or $0.47 per
share, for 2009, a decreased net loss of $4.6 million. The decreased net loss, excluding the $3.6 million
favorable impact from the change in fair value of warrant liability, was primarily due to increased total other
income and lower general and administrative expenses, partially offset by higher research and development
spending to support our clinical trials related to our H1N1 and seasonal influenza vaccine candidates.

The increase in weighted average shares outstanding for 2011 and 2010 is primarily a result of sales of
our common stock in the aggregate of 6,001,841 shares in 2011 and 10,513,849 shares in 2010, as well as
sales of our common stock in 2009, respectively.

Liquidity Matters and Capital Resources

Our

future capital

requirements depend on numerous factors including, but not

the time and costs involved in obtaining regulatory approvals,

the
commitments and progress of our research and development programs, the progress of pre-clinical and clinical
the costs of filing, prosecuting,
testing,
defending and enforcing patent claims and other intellectual property rights and manufacturing costs. We plan
to continue to have multiple vaccines and products in various stages of development, and we believe our
operating expenses and capital requirements will fluctuate depending upon the timing of certain events, such
as the scope, initiation, rate and progress of our pre-clinical studies and clinical trials and other research and
development activities.

limited to,

As of December 31, 2011, we had $14.1 million in cash and cash equivalents and $4.2 million in

short-term investments as compared to $8.1 million and $23.6 million, respectively, at December 31, 2010.

44

The following table summarizes cash flows for

the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

(in thousands):

Summary of Cash Flows:
Net cash (used in) provided by:
Operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year. . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . .

2011

2010

Change 2010
to 2011

$(23,629)
18,543
11,129
6,043
8,061
$ 14,104

$(32,852)
(21,273)
23,429
(30,696)
38,757
$ 8,061

$ 9,223
39,816
(12,300)
36,739
(30,696)
$ 6,043

Net cash used in operating activities decreased to a cash usage of $23.6 million for 2011 as compared to
$32.9 million for 2010. The decrease in cash usage was primarily due to a decreased net loss as a result of
revenue recognized under the HHS BARDA contract, partially offset by the timing of our customer and
vendor payments.

During 2011 and 2010, our investing activities consisted of purchases and maturities of short-term
investments and capital expenditures. In 2011, we utilized our short-term investments to fund operations and
increase our cash balances. In 2010, we purchased short-term investments to increase our rate of return on our
investments. Capital expenditures for 2011 and 2010 were $0.6 million and $1.6 million, respectively. The
decrease in capital expenditures was primarily due to the purchase of laboratory equipment relating to our
production scale-up in 2010. For 2012, we expect our level of capital expenditures to increase in connection
with the scale-up of our new manufacturing, laboratory and office facility.

The decrease in our financing activities consists primarily of lower sales of our common stock. We
received net proceeds of $11.0 million in 2011 as compared to $23.1 million in 2010 from the sale of our
common stock through our At Market Issuance Sales Agreement. We continue to sell our common stock under
our At Market Issuance Sales Agreement and since December 31, 2011 through March 8, 2012, we have sold
an additional 5.2 million shares for $7.2 million in net proceeds.

In November 2011, we entered into lease agreements, under which we will lease our new manufacturing,
laboratory and office space in Gaithersburg, Maryland. The lease agreements provide that, among other things,
as of January 1, 2012, we sublease from the current facility tenant, and subsequently lease from the landlord
approximately 74,000 total square feet, with rent payments for such space commencing April 1, 2014. Under
the terms of one of the lease agreements, the Landlord will provide us with a tenant improvement allowance
of $2.5 million and an additional tenant improvement allowance of $3 million dollars, which additional tenant
improvement allowance would be paid back to the Landlord during the remainder of the term of such lease
agreement (collectively, the Improvement Allowance). Since December 31, 2011 through March 8, 2012, we
have been funded $1.3 million under the Improvement Allowance. In addition, we entered into an agreement
with the current facility tenant to purchase laboratory equipment to be used at the space and $0.5 million is
owed under the agreement as of December 31, 2011.

We have entered into agreements with outside providers to support our clinical development. As of
December 31, 2011, $3.2 million remains unpaid on certain of these agreements in the event our outside
providers complete their services in 2012. However, under the terms of the agreements, we have the option to
terminate, but we would be obligated to pay the provider for all costs incurred through the effective date
of termination.

We have licensed certain rights from Wyeth. The Wyeth license, which provides for an upfront payment,
annual license fees, milestone payments and royalties on any product sales, is a non-exclusive, worldwide
license to a family of patent applications covering VLP technology for use in human vaccines in certain fields;
the license may be terminated by Wyeth only for cause and may be terminated by us only after we have
provided ninety (90) days notice that we have absolutely and finally ceased activity, including through any

45

affiliate or sublicense, related to the manufacturing, development, marketing or sale of products covered by the
license. We do not expect to make a milestone payment to Wyeth in the next twelve months.

In connection with our JV with Cadila, we entered into a master services agreement, which we and
Cadila amended in July 2011 to extend the term by one year for which services can be provided by Cadila
under this agreement. Under the recently revised terms, if, by March 2013, the amount of services provided
by Cadila under the master services agreement is less than $7.5 million, the Company will pay Cadila the
portion of the shortfall amount that is less than or equal to $2.0 million and 50% of the portion of the
shortfall amount that exceeds $2.0 million. Through December 31, 2011, we have purchased $0.2 million in
services from Cadila pursuant to this agreement.

Based on our cash and cash equivalents and short-term investment balances as of December 31, 2011,
anticipated revenue under the contract with HHS BARDA that was awarded in February 2011, possible
proceeds from the sales of our common stock under our At Market Issuance Sales Agreement and our current
business operations, we believe we have adequate capital resources available to operate at planned levels for
at least the next twelve months. Additional capital will be required in the future to develop our vaccine
candidates through clinical development, manufacturing and commercialization. Our ability to generate
revenue under the HHS BARDA contract is subject to our performance under the contract; our ability to raise
funds under our At Market Issuance Sales Agreement is subject to both our business performance and market
conditions. Further we will seek additional capital through further public or private equity offerings, debt
financing, additional strategic alliance and licensing arrangements, non-dilutive government contracts,
collaborative arrangements or some combination of these financing alternatives. Any capital raised by an
equity offering will
likely be substantially dilutive to the existing stockholders and any licensing or
development arrangement may require us to give up rights to a product or technology at less than its full
potential value. Other than our At Market Issuance Sales Agreement and the Improvement Allowance, we
have not secured any additional commitments for new financing nor can we provide any assurance that new
financing will be available on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. If we are unable to perform under the
HHS BARDA contract or obtain additional capital, we will assess our capital resources and will likely be
required to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate one or more of our product research and development
programs, downsize our organization or reduce our general and administrative infrastructure.

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2011 (in thousands):

Total

Less than
One Year

1 − 3
Years

3 − 5
Years

More than
5 Years

Contractual Obligations:
Operating leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Notes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchase obligations. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total contractual obligations . . . . . . . .

$31,624
320
7,800
$39,744

$2,680
20
3,500
$6,200

$ 5,728
300
4,300
$10,328

$7,948
—
—
$7,948

$15,268
—
—
$15,268

Our purchase obligations include our anticipated timing of future purchases for services pursuant to the
master services agreement with Cadila and $0.5 million related to an equipment purchase agreement
associated with our new manufacturing, laboratory and office space. We are required to purchase from Cadila
through March 2013 services for biologic research, pre-clinical development, clinical development, process
development, manufacturing scale-up and general manufacturing related services. As of December 31, 2011,
our remaining obligation to Cadila under the master services agreement is $7.3 million.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We are not involved in any off-balance sheet agreements that have or are reasonably likely to have a
material future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenue or expenses, results of
operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

46

Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve our capital until it is required to fund
investments without
the same time maximizing the income we receive from our
operations while at
significantly increasing risk. As of December 31, 2011, we had cash and cash equivalents of $14.1 million,
short-term investments of $4.2 million and working capital of $18.5 million.

Our exposure to market risk is primarily confined to our investment portfolio. As of December 31, 2011,
our short-term investments were classified as available-for-sale. We do not believe that a change in the market
rates of interest would have any significant
impact on the realizable value of our investment portfolio.
Changes in interest rates may affect the investment income we earn on our investments when they mature and
the proceeds are reinvested into new investments and, therefore, could impact our cash flows and results of
operations.

In 2007, we invested in auction rate securities as part of our cash management program. Short-term
investments at December 31, 2011 are comprised of investments in three auction rate securities with a par
value of $5.1 million and a fair value of $4.2 million. We recorded an other-than-temporary impairment
charge of $1.3 million related to these securities in 2009, which was partially offset by realized gains of
$0.8 million in 2009 relating to redemptions of several auction rate securities. At December 31, 2011, we have
recorded $0.8 million in unrealized gains on the auction rate securities included in other comprehensive
income on the balance sheet. These investments are classified within current assets because we may need to
liquidate these securities within the next year to fund our ongoing operations.

Interest and dividend income is recorded when earned and included in interest income. Premiums and
discounts, if any, on short-term investments are amortized or accreted to maturity and included in interest
income. The specific identification method is used in computing realized gains and losses on the sale of our
securities.

We are headquartered in the U.S. where we conduct

the vast majority of our business activities.

Accordingly, we have not had any material exposure to foreign currency rate fluctuations.

We do not have material debt and, as such, do not believe that we are exposed to any material interest

rate risk as a result of our borrowing activities.

Item 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The information required by this item is set forth on pages F-1 to F-26.

Item 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

Item 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The term ‘‘disclosure controls and procedures’’ (defined in SEC Rule 13a-15(e)) refers to the controls and
other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a
company in the reports that it files under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported, within time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and
limitation, controls and
‘‘Disclosure controls and procedures’’ include, without
Exchange Commission.
procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it
files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management,
including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

The Company’s management, with the participation of the chief executive officer and the chief financial
officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of
the period covered by this annual report (the Evaluation Date). Based on that evaluation, the Company’s chief
executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, such controls and
procedures were effective.

47

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial
reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated
under the Exchange Act, as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s principal
executive officer and principal financial officer and effected by the Company’s board of directors, management
and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles (GAAP). Such internal control includes those policies and procedures that:

•

•

•

pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the
Company; and

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition,
use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial
statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2011. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth in Internal
Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). Based on its assessment, our management had determined that, as of December 31,
2011, out internal controls over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

Grant Thornton LLP has issued an attestation report on our internal control over financial reporting. This

report is included in the Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm in Item 15.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, has evaluated any
changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarterly period ended
December 31, 2011, and has concluded that there was no change that occurred during the quarterly period
ended December 31, 2011 that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

48

PART III

Item 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

We incorporate herein by reference the information concerning our directors, officers and corporate
governance to be included in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders
to file the 2012 Proxy
scheduled to be held on June 11, 2012 (the 2012 Proxy Statement). We expect
Statement within 120 days after the close of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.

Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

We incorporate herein by reference the information concerning executive compensation to be contained in

the 2012 Proxy Statement.

Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

We incorporate herein by reference the information concerning security ownership of certain beneficial

owners and management and related stockholder matters to be contained in the 2012 Proxy Statement.

The following table provides our equity compensation plan information as of December 31, 2011. Under
these plans, our common stock may be issued upon the exercise of options. See also the information regarding
our stock options in Note 11 to the financial statements included herewith.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Number of Securities to
be Issued Upon Exercise
of Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(a)

Weighted-Average
Exercise Price of
Outstanding Options,
Warrants and Rights
(b)

Number of Securities
Remaining Available for
Future Issuance Under
Equity Compensation
Plans (Excluding Securities
Reflected in Column (a))
(c)

Plan Category
Equity compensation plans

approved by security holders(1) .

7,887,396

Equity compensation plans not

approved by security holders . . .

N/A

$2.36

N/A

3,311,224

N/A

(1)

Includes our 2005 Stock Incentive Plan and 1995 Stock Option Plan.

Item 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE

We incorporate herein by reference the information concerning certain related party transactions set forth
in Note 16 to our financial statements included herewith. We incorporate herein by reference the information
concerning certain other relationships and related transactions and director independence to be contained in the
2012 Proxy Statement.

Item 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

We incorporate herein by reference the information concerning principal accountant fees and services to

be contained in the 2012 Proxy Statement.

49

PART IV

Item 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) The following documents are filed as part of the Annual Report on Form 10-K:

(1)

Index to Financial Statements

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 . . . . . . . .

Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 .

Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 . . . . . . .

Notes to Financial Statements. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-2

F-4

F-5

F-6

F-7

F-8

(2) Financial Statement Schedules

Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

All other financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable, not required under

the instructions or all the information required is set forth in the financial statements or notes thereto.

(3) Exhibits

Exhibits marked with a single asterisk (*) are filed herewith.

Exhibits marked with a double plus sign (††) refer to management contracts, compensatory plans

or arrangements.

Confidential treatment has been granted for portions of exhibits marked with a double asterisk (**).

All other exhibits listed have previously been filed with the Commission and are incorporated herein

by reference.

3.1

3.2

4.1

4.2

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
1996, filed March 21, 1997), as amended by the Certificate of Amendment dated December 18,
2000 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2000, filed March 29, 2001), as further amended by the
Certificate of Amendment dated July 8, 2004 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, filed August 9,
2004), as further amended by the Certificate of Amendment dated May 13, 2009 (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2009)

Amended and Restated By-Laws of the Company, as amended on August 2, 2007 (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed August 8,
2007)

Specimen stock certificate for shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form 10, File
No. 0-26770, filed September 14, 1995)

Rights Agreement, dated as of August 8, 2002, by and between the Company and Equiserve
Trust Company, which includes the Form of Summary of Rights to Purchase Series D Junior
Participating Preferred Stock as Exhibit A, the Form of Right Certificate as Exhibit B and the
Form of Certificate of Designation of Series D Junior Participating Preferred Stock as Exhibit C
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
August 9, 2002) (File No. 000-26770)

50

4.3

4.4

10.1††

10.2††

10.3††

10.4††

10.5††

10.6††

10.7*††
10.8††

10.9††

10.10††

10.11††

10.12*††
10.13††

10.14††

10.15

10.16

Registration Rights Agreement between Novavax,
Inc. and Satellite Overseas (Holdings)
Limited, dated March 31, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009)

Form of Common Stock Purchase Warrant (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the
Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed July 30, 2008)

Novavax, Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan, as amended (Incorporated by reference to Appendix A of
the Company’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed March 31, 2003 in connection with the Annual
Meeting held on May 7, 2003) (File No. 000-26770)

Novavax, Inc. Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Quarterly Report for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, filed
August 9, 2011)

Employment Agreement of Stanley C. Erck, dated as of February 15, 2010 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 1, 2010)

Employment Agreement of Stanley C. Erck, dated as of June 22, 2011 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Quarterly Report for the quarter ended June 30,
2011, filed August 9, 2011)

Amended and Restated Employment Agreement of Rahul Singhvi, effective July 20, 2009
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
July 22, 2009)
Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement of Rahul Singhvi, dated May 27,
2010 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K,
filed June 1, 2010)
Severance Agreement of Rahul Singhvi, dated as of April 19, 2011
Employment Agreement between Novavax, Inc. and Frederick Driscoll dated August 6, 2009
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed
August 7, 2009)
Employment Agreement of John Trizzino dated July 16, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.15 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009, filed March 16, 2010)
Employment Agreement of Gregory Glenn dated July 1, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed July 6, 2010)
Employment Agreement of Russell Wilson dated November 7, 2011 (Incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 14, 2011)
Employment Agreement of Timothy Hahn dated June 22, 2011
Novavax, Inc. Amended and Restated Change in Control Severance Benefit Plan, (Incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 5,
2009)

Indemnity Agreement, as of

Form of
January 1, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2009, filed March 16, 2010)

Lease Agreement, dated as of July 15, 2004, between Liberty Property Limited Partnership and
the Company (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report in
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, filed August 9, 2004)

Sublease Agreement, dated April 28, 2006, by and between the Company and Sterilox
Technologies, Inc. (now PuriCore, Inc.) (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2006, filed
August 14, 2006)

51

10.17

10.18

10.19

10.20

10.21

10.22

10.23*

10.24*

10.25*

10.26**

10.27**

10.28**

10.29**

10.30

10.31

10.32

Amendment dated as of October 25, 2006 to the Sublease Agreement, dated April 28, 2006, by
and between the Company and Sterilox Technologies, Inc. (now PuriCore, Inc.) (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2006, filed November 14, 2006)

Second Amendment to Sublease Agreement between Novavax, Inc. and PuriCore, Inc., dated
April 22, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report
for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, filed August 10, 2009)

Third Amendment to Sublease Agreement between Novavax, Inc. and PuriCore, Inc., dated
December 29, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Company’s Annual
Report for the year ended December 31, 2010, filed March 28, 2011)

Lease Agreement between GP Rock One, LLC and Novavax, Inc., dated as of May 7, 2007
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report for the quarter
ended June 30, 2008, filed August 11, 2008)

First Amendment to Lease Agreement between GP Rock One, LLC and Novavax, Inc., dated as
of May 30, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report
for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, filed August 11, 2008)

Second Amendment
to Lease Agreement between BMR-9920 Belward Campus Q, LLC
(formerly GP Rock One, LLC) and Novavax, Inc., dated as of June 26, 2008 (Incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Quarterly Report for the quarter ended June 30,
2008, filed August 11, 2008)
Lease Agreement for space at 20 Firstfield between ARE-20/22/1300 Firstfield Quince Orchard,
LLC and Novavax, Inc., dated as of November 18, 2011
Sublease Agreement for space at 20 Firstfield between Intercell USA, Inc. and Novavax, Inc.,
dated as of October 21, 2011 and effective as of November 18, 2011
Lease Agreement for space at 22 Firstfield between ARE-20/22/1300 Firstfield Quince Orchard,
LLC and Novavax, Inc., dated as of November 18, 2011
Contract, effective as of February 24, 2011, between the Company and HHS/OS/ASPR/BARDA
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Amendment No. 1 to its Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, filed November 4, 2011)
License Agreement, entered in February 25, 2011, effective as of December 9, 2010, between
the Company and LG Life Sciences, Ltd. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the
Company’s Amendment No. 1 to its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended
March 31, 2011, filed November 4, 2011)
License Agreement, dated July 5, 2007, between the Company and Wyeth Holdings Corporation
(Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2007, filed August 9, 2007)
Amendment No. 1 to License Agreement, effective as of March 17, 2010, between the Company
and Wyeth Holdings Corporation (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.49 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, filed August 6, 2010)

Form of
Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed July 30, 2008)

Investor Rights Agreement dated July 29, 2008 (Incorporated by reference to

At Market Issuance Sales Agreement, dated March 15, 2010, by and between Novavax, Inc. and
McNicoll, Lewis and Vlak, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.37 to the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, filed March 16, 2010)

Stock Purchase Agreement between Novavax, Inc. and Satellite Overseas (Holdings) Limited,
dated March 31, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009)

52

10.33**

10.34**

10.35

10.36**

10.37**

10.38**

10.39**

10.40**

14

23.1*
31.1*

31.2*

32.1*

32.2*

Amended and Restated Joint Venture Agreement between Novavax Inc.
and Cadila
Pharmaceuticals Limited, dated as of June 29, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4
to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, filed on
August 10, 2009)

Amended and Restated Master Services Agreement between Novavax,
Inc. and Cadila
Pharmaceuticals Limited, dated as of June 29, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5
to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, filed on
August 10, 2009)

Amendment to Master Services Agreement between Novavax, Inc. and Cadila Pharmaceuticals
Limited dated July 27, 2011 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, filed on November 8,
2011)

Amended and Restated Supply Agreement between Novavax, Inc. and CPL Biologicals Limited,
dated as of June 29, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, filed on August 10, 2009)

Amended and Restated Technical Services Agreement between Novavax,
Inc. and CPL
Biologicals Limited, dated as of June 29, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, filed on
August 10, 2009)
Amended and Restated Seasonal / Other License Agreement between Novavax, Inc. and CPL
Biologicals Limited, dated as of June 29, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, filed on
August 10, 2009)
Amended and Restated Option to Obtain License between Novavax, Inc. and CPL Biologicals
Limited, dated as of June 29, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, filed on August 10, 2009)
H1N1 License to Agreement between Novavax, Inc. and CPL Biologicals Private Limited, dated
October 6, 2009 (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.45 to the Company’s Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010)
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14 to the
Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, filed on
August 9, 2011)
Consent of Grant Thornton LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Certification of chief executive officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(e) of the Securities
Exchange Act
Certification of chief financial officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(e) of the Securities
Exchange Act

Certification of chief executive officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

Certification of chief financial officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

53

SIGNATURES

Pursuant

the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,

NOVAVAX, INC.

By: /s/ Stanley C. Erck

President and Chief Executive Officer
and Director

Date: March 14, 2012

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below

by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

Name

Title

Date

/s/ Stanley C. Erck
Stanley C. Erck

/s/ Frederick W. Driscoll
Frederick W. Driscoll

s/ James F. Young
James F. Young

/s/ Richard H. Douglas
Richard H. Douglas

/s/ Gary C. Evans
Gary C. Evans

/s/ John O. Marsh, Jr.
John O. Marsh, Jr.

/s/ Michael A. McManus
Michael A. McManus

/s/ Rajiv Modi
Rajiv Modi

President and Chief Executive Officer and
Director (Principal Executive Officer)

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
Treasurer (Principal Financial Officer and
Principal Accounting Officer)

March 14, 2012

March 14, 2012

Chairman of the Board of Directors

March 14, 2012

March 14, 2012

March 14, 2012

March 14, 2012

March 14, 2012

March 14, 2012

Director

Director

Director

Director

Director

54

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

Contents

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 . . . . . .

Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009. . . . . . . . . . . . .

Notes to Financial Statements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-2

F-4

F-5

F-6

F-7

F-8

Schedule II — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Novavax, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Novavax,

(a Delaware corporation)
(the ‘‘Company’’) as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’
equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011. Our audits of
the basic financial statements included the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under
Item 15(a)(2). These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and
financial statement schedule based on our audits.

Inc.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable
includes
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An
audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
financial position of Novavax, Inc. as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the results of its operations and its
cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011 in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the related financial
statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based
on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our report dated March 14, 2012 expressed an
unqualified opinion thereon.

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

McLean, Virginia
March 14, 2012

F-2

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Novavax, Inc.

We have audited Novavax, Inc.’s (a Delaware Corporation) internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Novavax Inc.’s management
is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report
on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on Novavax Inc.’s
internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing
the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of
internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary
in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that,
in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect
the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Novavax, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework
issued by COSO.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States), the balance sheets of Novavax, Inc. as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the
related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2011 and our report dated March 14, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion on those
financial statements.

/s/ Grant Thornton LLP

McLean, VA
March 14, 2012

F-3

NOVAVAX, INC.

BALANCE SHEETS

December 31,

2011

2010

(in thousands, except share and
per share information)

ASSETS

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Short-term investments available-for-sale . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unbilled receivables. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Goodwill . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other non-current assets. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ 14,104
4,205
1,965
1,836
2,441
1,558
26,109
6,857
33,141
469
$ 66,576

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current portion of notes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred rent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Warrant liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-current portion of notes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred rent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total liabilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Commitments and contingences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Stockholders’ equity:

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 2,000,000 shares authorized; no shares

issued and outstanding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Common stock, $0.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized; and
117,480,867 shares issued and 117,025,437 shares outstanding at
December 31, 2011 and 111,492,014 shares issued and 111,036,584 shares
outstanding at December 31, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Additional paid-in capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Notes receivable from former directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated deficit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Treasury stock, 455,430 shares, cost basis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accumulated other comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

2,645
4,528
20
386
7,579
368
2,500
300
1,980
12,727

—

—

$

8,061
23,615
54
—
1,342
265
33,337
8,206
33,141
160
$ 74,844

$

3,572
6,273
80
341
10,266
2,842
—
320
2,366
15,794

—

—

1,175
383,948
—
(329,656)
(2,450)
832
53,849
$ 66,576

1,115
371,477
(1,572)
(310,292)
(2,450)
772
59,050
$ 74,844

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-4

NOVAVAX, INC.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

Contract revenue. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Costs and expenses:

Cost of contract revenue. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research and development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
General and administrative . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total costs and expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss from operations before other income (expense) . . . . . . . . .
Other income (expense):

Interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Interest expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment of short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Realized gains on short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in fair value of warrant liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss from operations before income tax . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Income tax expense (benefit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net loss. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Basic and diluted net loss per share: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Basic and diluted weighted average number of common shares

For the Years ended December 31,
2011
2010
(in thousands, except per share information)

2009

$ 14,688

$

343

$

325

7,003
17,885
11,379
36,267
(21,579)

136
(9)
26
—
—
2,474
(18,952)
412
$ (19,364)
(0.17)
$

—
28,032
10,805
38,837
(38,494)

189
(9)
485
—
—
1,671
(36,158)
(450)
$ (35,708)
(0.34)
$

—
25,780
11,928
37,708
(37,383)

285
(786)
—
(1,338)
848
(1,972)
(40,346)
—
$(40,346)
(0.47)
$

outstanding. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

113,610

104,768

85,555

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-5

NOVAVAX, INC.

STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
For the Years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

Common Stock

Shares

Amount

Additional
Paid-in
Capital

Notes
Receivable
From Former
Directors

Accumulated
Deficit

Treasury
Stock

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income

Total
Stockholders’
Equity

Comprehensive
Loss

69,220,021

$ 692

$280,516

$(1,572)

$(234,238)

$(2,450)

$ —

$ 42,948

(in thousands, except share information)

—
546,832

10,000

—
5

—

1,533
947

—

12,500,000

125

10,469

1,094,891
3,056,939

7,489,207

6,800,000

—
—
—

11
31

75

68

—
—
—

2,966
7,629

21,930

20,741

—
—
—

—
—

—

—

—
—

—

—

—
—
—

—
—

—

—

—
—

—

—

—
(40,346)
—

—
—

—

—

—
—

—

—

—
—
—

100,717,890

1,007

346,731

(1,572)

(274,584)

(2,450)

—
261,942

75,000
(76,667)

—
3

1
(1)

1,339
423

(1)
1

10,513,849

105

22,984

—
—
—

—
—
—

—
—
—

—
—

—
—

—

—
—
—

—
—

—
—

—

—
(35,708)
—

—
—

—
—

—

—
—
—

111,492,014

1,115

371,477

(1,572)

(310,292)

(2,450)

—
198,679

50,000

—
2

1

2,047
177

(1)

—
—

—

(261,667)

(3)

(1,519)

1,572

6,001,841

—
—
—

60

—
—
—

11,767

—
—
—

—

—
—
—

—
—

—

—

—

—
(19,364)
—

—
—

—

—

—

—
—
—

—
—

—

—

—
—

—

—

820
—
—

820

—
—

—
—

—

(48)
—
—

772

—
—

—

—

—

60
—
—

1,533
952

—

10,594

2,977
7,660

22,005

20,809

820
(40,346)
—

69,952

1,339
426

—
—

23,089

(48)
(35,708)
—

59,050

2,047
179

—

50

11,827

60
(19,364)
—

$

820
(40,346)
$(39,526)

$

(48)
(35,708)
$(35,756)

$
60
(19,364)
$(19,304)

117,480,867

$1,175

$383,948

$ —

$(329,656)

$(2,450)

$832

$ 53,849

Balance at December 31, 2008 .
Non-cash compensation costs for

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

stock options and restricted stock.
.

Exercise of stock options .
Restricted stock issued as
.

compensation .

.
Issuance of common stock to Cadila,
net of issuance costs of $406 .
.
.
Issuance of common stock to Rovi,
.
.
net of issuance costs of $23.
Conversion of convertible debt
.
.
Issuance of common stock under
ATM, net of issuance costs of
.
.
$682 . .
.
Issuance of common stock, net of
.

.
Unrealized gain (loss) on short-term
.
.
.
.
.

.
.
Net loss . .
Comprehensive loss .

investments .
.

issuance costs of $1,631.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.

.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.

.

.

.
.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.
.

.
.

.
.

Balance at December 31, 2009 .
.
Non-cash compensation cost for stock
.
.

options and restricted stock .
.

Exercise of stock options .
Restricted stock issued as
.

compensation .

.
.
Restricted stock cancelled .
.
Issuance of common stock under
ATM, net of issuance costs of
.
.
.
$468 . .
Unrealized gain (loss) on short-term
.
.
.
.
.

.
Net loss . .
.
Comprehensive loss .

investments .
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Balance at December 31, 2010 .
Non-cash compensation costs for

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

stock options and restricted stock.
.

Exercise of stock options .
Restricted stock issued as
.

compensation .

to former directors.

.
.
Cancellation of common stock issued
.

.
Issuance of common stock under
ATM, net of issuance costs of
.
.
.
$246 . .
Unrealized gain (loss) on short-term
.
.
.
.
.

.
Net loss . .
.
Comprehensive loss .

investments .
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.
.

.
.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Balance at December 31, 2011 .

.

.

.
.

.

.
.
.

.

.
.

.

.

.

.
.
.

.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-6

NOVAVAX, INC.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

2011

For the Years ended December 31,
2010
(in thousands)

2009

Operating Activities:

Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Reconciliation of net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Change in fair value of warrant liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Depreciation and amortization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of deferred financing costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of debt discount . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Loss on disposal of property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Impairment of long-lived assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Amortization of net premiums on short-term investments . . . .
Deferred rent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-cash stock-based compensation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net impairment of short-term investments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

Accounts receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unbilled receivables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses and other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accounts payable and accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred revenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash used in operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Investing Activities:

Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Purchases of short-term investments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from maturities of short-term investments . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash provided by (used in) by investing activities . . . . . . . .

Financing Activities:

Principal payments of notes payable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proceeds from settlement of notes receivable from former

directors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Net proceeds from sales of common stock, net of offering costs

of $0.2 million, $0.5 million and $2.7 million, respectively . . .
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net cash provided by financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents . . . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year. . . . . . . . . . . . .
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities:

Conversion of convertible debt and accrued interest to

$(19,364)

$(35,708)

$(40,346)

(2,474)
1,613
—
—
—
360
317
(341)
2,047
—

(1,911)
(1,836)
(1,854)
(2,686)
2,500
(23,629)

(610)
(2,082)
21,235
18,543

(80)

50

(1,671)
1,372
—
—
35
162
247
(282)
1,339
—

204
—
(312)
1,912
(150)
(32,852)

(1,556)
(38,717)
19,000
(21,273)

1,972
1,194
147
222
21
23
—
(279)
1,533
490

32
—
(536)
2,547
150
(32,830)

(745)
—
3,100
2,355

(86)

(15,043)

—

—

10,980
179
11,129
6,043
8,061
$ 14,104

23,089
426
23,429
(30,696)
38,757
$ 8,061

56,385
952
42,294
11,819
26,938
$ 38,757

common stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$

—

Equipment purchases included in accounts payable and

accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Settlement of notes receivable from former directors . . . . . . . . .
Sale of common stock under the At Market Issuance Sales

Agreement not settled at year-end . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

Cash interest payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$
14
$ 1,522

$

$

847

—

$

$
$

$

$

—

$ 7,660

418
—

—

—

$
$

$

$

66
—

—

817

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-7

NOVAVAX, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

Note 1 — Organization

is

company that

Novavax, Inc. (the ‘‘Company’’) is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on developing
novel recombinant vaccines to address a broad range of infectious diseases. The Company’s goal is to become
a profitable vaccine
and
important vaccines worldwide. The Company’s technology platform is based on
commercialization of
proprietary recombinant vaccine technology that
includes virus-like particles (‘‘VLPs’’) and recombinant
nanoparticle vaccines combined with a single-use bioprocessing production system. These vaccine candidates
are genetically engineered three-dimensional nanostructures that
incorporate immunologically important
recombinant proteins. The Company’s product pipeline targets a variety of infectious diseases and its vaccine
candidates are currently in or have completed clinical trials that target pandemic influenza (H5N1), seasonal
influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (‘‘RSV’’).

aggressively driving towards development,

licensure

In 2009,

the Company formed a joint venture with Cadila Pharmaceuticals Limited named
CPL Biologicals Private Limited to develop and manufacture vaccines, biological therapeutics and diagnostics
in India. The joint venture is owned 20% by the Company and 80% by Cadila Pharmaceuticals Limited
(see Note 5).

Note 2 — Liquidity Matters

The Company’s vaccine candidates currently under development will require significant additional
research and development efforts, including extensive pre-clinical and clinical testing, and regulatory approval
prior to commercial use. The Company’s research and development efforts may not be successful and any
potential vaccine candidates may not prove to be safe and effective in clinical trials. Even if developed, these
vaccine candidates may not receive regulatory approval or be successfully introduced and marketed at prices
that would permit the Company to operate profitably. The commercial launch of any vaccine is subject to
significant risks including, but not limited to, manufacturing scale-up and market acceptance.

Since its inception, the Company has incurred, and continues to incur, significant losses from operations.
At December 31, 2011,
the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $14.1 million and short-term
investments with a fair value of $4.2 million. Since December 31, 2011 through March 8, 2012, the Company
has sold 5.2 million shares under its At Market Issuance Sales Agreement for $7.2 million in net proceeds.

to

its

future

vaccine

develop

candidates

Based on the Company’s cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments balances as of
December 31, 2011, anticipated revenue under the contract with the Department of Health and Human
Services, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (‘‘HHS BARDA’’) that was awarded in
February 2011, possible proceeds from sales of the Company’s common stock under its At Market Issuance
Sales Agreement and its current business operations, the Company believes it has adequate capital resources
available to operate at planned levels for at least the next twelve months. Additional capital will be required in
the
and
commercialization. The Company’s ability to generate revenue under the HHS BARDA contract is subject to
its performance under the contract; its ability to raise funds under its At Market Issuance Sales Agreement is
subject to both its business performance and market conditions. Further, the Company may seek additional
capital through public or private equity offerings, debt financing, strategic alliance and licensing arrangements,
non-dilutive government contracts, collaborative arrangements, or some combination of
these financing
alternatives. Any capital raised by an equity offering, whether public or private, will likely be substantially
dilutive to the existing stockholders and any licensing or development arrangement may require the Company
to give up rights to a product or technology at less than its full potential value. Other than the Company’s At
Market Issuance Sales Agreement and the Improvement Allowance (see Note 15), the Company has not
secured any additional commitments for new financing, nor can the Company provide any assurance that
financing will be available on commercially acceptable terms, if at all. If the Company is unable to perform
under the HHS BARDA contract or obtain additional capital, it will assess its capital resources and will likely

development, manufacturing

through

clinical

F-8

NOVAVAX, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

Note 2 — Liquidity Matters − (continued)

be required to delay, reduce the scope of, or eliminate one or more of its research and development programs,
and/or downsize the organization, including its general and administrative infrastructure.

Note 3 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets
and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ materially
from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less

from the date of purchase.

Short-Term Investments

Short-term investments at December 31, 2011 consist of three auction rate securities. All marketable
securities had original maturities greater than 90 days, but less than one year. In 2009, the Company recorded
other-than-temporary impairment charges related to its auction rate securities of $1.3 million because of the
uncertainties in the credit markets and management’s belief these securities could not be sold at par value, but
are saleable at a discount from their par value. In 2009, the Company realized gains of $0.8 million relating to
redemptions of several auction rate securities from its portfolio.

In 2007, the Company had invested in auction rate securities as part of its cash management program.
Uncertainties in the credit markets have prevented the Company from liquidating certain holdings of auction
rate securities as the amount of securities submitted for sale during the auction has exceeded the amount of
purchase orders. Although an event of an auction failure does not necessarily mean that a security is impaired,
the Company considered various factors to assess the fair value and the classification of the securities as
short-term investments. Fair value was determined through an independent valuation using two valuation
methods — a discounted cash flow method and a market comparable method. Certain factors used in these
methods include, but are not necessarily limited to, comparable securities traded on secondary markets, timing
of the failed auction, specific security auction history, quality of underlying collateral, rating of the security
and the bond insurer, the Company’s ability and intent to retain the securities for a period of time to allow for
anticipated recovery in the market value and other factors.

The Company has classified its short-term investments as available-for-sale since the Company may need
to liquidate these securities within the next year. The available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value and
unrealized gains and losses on these securities, if determined to be temporary, are included in accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity. Short-term investments are evaluated periodically
to determine whether a decline in value is ‘‘other-than-temporary.’’ The term ‘‘other-than-temporary’’ is not
intended to indicate a permanent decline in value. Rather, it means that the prospects for a near term recovery
of value are not necessarily favorable, or that there is a lack of evidence to support fair values equal to, or
greater than, the carrying value of the security. Management reviews criteria, such as the magnitude and
duration of the decline, as well as the Company’s ability to hold the securities until market recovery, to
predict whether
If a decline in value is determined to be
other-than-temporary, the value of the security is reduced and the impairment is recorded in the statements of
operations. The specific identification method is used in computing realized gains and losses on sale of the
Company’s securities.

the loss in value is other-than-temporary.

F-9

NOVAVAX, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

Note 3 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies − (continued)

Short-term investments classified as available-for-sale as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 were comprised

of (in thousands):

Auction rate

December 31, 2011
Gross
Gross
Unrealized
Unrealized
Losses
Gains

Amortized
Cost

Fair Value

Amortized
Cost

December 31, 2010
Gross
Gross
Unrealized
Unrealized
Losses
Gains

Fair Value

securities . . . . . . .

$3,373

$832

$ —

$4,205

$ 3,373

$773

$ —

$ 4,146

Corporate debt

securities . . . . . . .
Total . . . . . . . . . . .

—
$3,373

—
$832

—
$ —

—
$4,205

19,470
$22,843

—
$773

(1)
$ (1)

19,469
$23,615

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial

instruments, which possibly expose the Company to concentration of credit risk, consist
primarily of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments. The Company’s investment policy limits
investments to certain types of instruments,
including auction rate securities, high-grade corporate debt
instruments, places restrictions on maturities and concentrations in certain
securities and money market
industries and requires the Company to maintain a certain level of liquidity. At times, the Company maintains
cash balances in financial institutions, which may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not
experienced any losses relating to such accounts and believes it is not exposed to a significant credit risk on
its cash and cash equivalents. The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents approximates their fair value
based on their short-term maturities at December 31, 2011 and 2010. As discussed below, the fair value of
short-term investments is based upon Level 2 data.

Fair Value Measurements

The Company applies Accounting Standards Codification (‘‘ASC’’) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements

and Disclosures, for financial and non-financial assets and liabilities.

ASC 820 discusses valuation techniques, such as the market approach (comparable market prices), the
income approach (present value of future income or cash flow) and the cost approach (cost to replace the
service capacity of an asset or replacement cost). The statement utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes
the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels. The following is a brief
description of those three levels:

•

•

•

Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets
or liabilities.

Inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly
Level 2:
or indirectly. These include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets and quoted
prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active.

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions.

F-10

NOVAVAX, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

Note 3 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies − (continued)

Financial assets and liabilities measured a fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2011 and

2010 are summarized below (in thousands):

Fair Value at December 31, 2011
Level 2

Level 3

Level 1

Fair Value at December 31, 2010
Level 2

Level 3

Level 1

Assets
Corporate debt securities and

auction rate securities. . . . . . . .
Total Short-term investments . . . .

$ —
$ —

$4,205
$4,205

$ —
$ —

$ —
$ —

$23,615
$23,615

$ —
$ —

Liabilities
Warrant liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . .

$ —

$ —

$368

$ —

$ —

$2,842

The following table summarizes the activity of Level 3 inputs measured on a recurring basis for the year

ended December 31, 2011 (in thousands):

Balance at December 31, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in fair value of Warrant liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Balance at December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Fair Value Measurements
of Warrants Using
Significant Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
$ 2,842
(2,474)
368

$

The amounts in the Company’s balance sheet for accounts receivable, accounts payable and notes payable

approximate fair value due to their short-term nature.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable arise primarily from the Company’s contract with HHS BARDA and are reported at

amounts expected to be collected in future periods. No allowance for doubtful accounts is deemed necessary.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated using the straight-line method over the
estimated useful lives of the assets, generally three to ten years. Amortization of leasehold improvements is
provided over the shorter of the estimated useful lives of the improvements or the term of the lease. Repairs
and maintenance costs are expensed as incurred.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill originally resulted from a business acquisition in 2000. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed
were recorded at their fair values; the excess of the purchase price over the identifiable net assets acquired
was recorded as goodwill. Goodwill and intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives are not amortized,
but are subject to impairment tests annually or more frequently should indicators of impairment arise. The
Company utilizes primarily the market approach and,
the income approach to
determine if it has an impairment of its goodwill. The market approach is based on market value of invested
capital. When utilized, the income approach is used as a confirming look to the market approach. Goodwill
impairment is deemed to exist if the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value.

if considered necessary,

At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company used the market approach to determine if the Company
had an impairment of its goodwill. Step one of the impairment test states that if the fair value of a reporting
unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill is considered not to be impaired. The fair value of the Company’s
reporting unit was substantially higher than the carrying value, resulting in no impairment to goodwill at
December 31, 2011 and 2010.

F-11

NOVAVAX, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

Note 3 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies − (continued)

Equity Method Investment

The Company has an equity investment in CPL Biologicals Private Limited. The Company accounts for
this investment using the equity method (see Note 5). Under the equity method of accounting, investments are
stated at initial cost and are adjusted for subsequent additional investments and the Company’s proportionate
share of earnings or losses and distributions up to the amount initially invested or advanced.

Long-Lived Assets

The Company accounts for the impairment of its long-lived assets in accordance with ASC 360, Property,
Plant and Equipment. This financial standard requires a periodic evaluation of the recoverability of the
carrying value of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
value of the asset may not be recoverable. The Company considers historical performance and anticipated
future results in its evaluation of potential
impairment. Accordingly, when indicators of impairment are
present, the Company evaluates the carrying value of these assets in relation to the operating performance of
the business and future undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of these assets. Impairment
losses are recognized when the sum of expected future cash flows is less than the assets’ carrying value, and
losses are determined based upon the excess carrying value of the assets over its fair value.

Revenue Recognition

The Company performs research and development

for U.S. government agencies. The Company
recognizes revenue under research contracts when a contract has been executed, the contract price is fixed and
determinable, delivery of services or products has occurred and collection of the contract price is considered
probable. Revenue is earned under cost reimbursable and fixed price contracts. Direct contract costs are
expensed as incurred.

Under cost reimbursable contracts, the Company is reimbursed for allowable costs and paid a fixed fee.
Revenue on cost reimbursable contracts is recognized as costs are incurred plus a portion of the fee earned.
Revenue for fixed price arrangements are recognized under the proportional performance method based upon
the ratio of costs incurred to achieve contract milestones to total estimated cost. Losses on contracts, if any,
are recognized in the period in which they become known.

For upfront payments and licensing fees related to contract research or technology, the Company follows
provisions of ASC 605, Revenue Recognition,
the
culmination of a separate earnings process or if they should be deferred and recognized as revenue over the
life of the related agreement.

in determining if these payments and fees represent

Cost of Contract Revenue

Cost of contract

revenue includes direct costs of salaries,

laboratory supplies, consultants and
subcontractors and other direct costs associated with the Company’s process development, manufacturing,
clinical, regulatory and quality assurance activities under research contracts. Cost of contract revenue does not
include allocations of indirect costs.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for stock-based compensation related to grants of stock options and restricted
stock awards at fair value. The Company recognizes compensation expense related to such awards on a
straight-line basis over the requisite service period (generally the vesting period) of the equity awards that are
expected to vest, which typically occurs ratably over periods ranging from six months to four years. See
Note 11 for a further discussion on stock-based compensation.

F-12

NOVAVAX, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

Note 3 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies − (continued)

The expected term of stock options granted was based on the Company’s historical option exercise
experience and post-vesting forfeiture experience using the historical expected term from the vesting date. The
expected volatility of the options granted was determined using historical volatilities based on stock prices
over a look-back period corresponding to the expected term. The risk-free interest rate was determined using
the yield available for zero-coupon U.S. government issues with a remaining term equal to the expected term
of the options. The forfeiture rate was determined using historical pre-vesting forfeiture rates since the
inception of the plans. The Company has never paid a dividend, and as such, the dividend yield is zero.

Restricted stock awards to employees and directors have been recorded as compensation expense over the
expected vesting period based on the fair value at the award date and the number of shares ultimately
expected to vest using the straight-line method of amortization. The Company accounts for share-based
awards issued to non-employees by determining the fair value of equity awards given as consideration for
services rendered to be recognized as compensation expense over the shorter of the vesting or service periods.
In cases where an equity award is not fully vested, such equity award must be revalued on each subsequent
reporting date until vesting is complete with a cumulative catch-up adjustment recognized for any changes in
its estimated fair value.

Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses include salaries, laboratory supplies, consultants and subcontractors
and other expenses associated with the Company’s process development, manufacturing, clinical, regulatory
and quality assurance activities for internally funded programs. In addition, indirect costs such as, fringe
benefits and overhead expenses, are also included in research and development expenses. These expenses
exclude costs associated with cost of contract revenue.

Warrant Accounting

The Company accounts for the Warrants in accordance with applicable accounting guidance in ASC 815,
Derivatives and Hedging, as derivative liabilities. As such, the Warrants have been classified as a non-current
liability in the Company’s balance sheets. The term of the Warrants expire July 31, 2013. In compliance with
applicable accounting standards, registered warrants that require the issuance of registered shares upon
exercise and do not sufficiently preclude an implied right to cash settlement are accounted for as derivative
liabilities. The Company uses the Monte Carlo Simulation model to determine the fair value of the Warrants,
which requires the input of subjective assumptions,
including the expected stock price volatility and
probability of a fundamental transaction (a strategic merger or sale).

The fair value of the Warrants as of December 31 was estimated with the following assumptions:

Underlying price of common stock per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercise price per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Risk-free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividend yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Volatility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected term (in years). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Probability of a fundamental transaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2011
$1.26
$3.62
0.20%
0%
72.5%
1.58
0% − 5%

2010
$2.43
$3.62
0.85%
0%
75.2%
2.58
0% − 5%

The revaluation of the estimated fair value of Warrants at each subsequent balance sheet date results in a
change in the carrying value of the liability, which is recorded as ‘‘change in fair value of warrant liability’’ in
the statements of operations.

F-13

NOVAVAX, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

Note 3 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies − (continued)

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes. Under the
liability method, deferred income taxes are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their
respective tax basis and operating loss carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using
enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the year in which those temporary differences are
expected to be recovered or settled. The effect of changes in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is
recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is established
when necessary to reduce net deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

Tax benefits associated with uncertain tax positions are recognized in the period in which one of the
following conditions is satisfied: (1) the more likely than not recognition threshold is satisfied; (2) the position
is ultimately settled through negotiation or litigation; or (3) the statute of limitations for the taxing authority to
examine and challenge the position has expired. Tax benefits associated with an uncertain tax position are
reversed in the period in which the more likely than not recognition threshold is no longer satisfied.

Interest and penalties related to income tax matters are recorded as income tax expense. At December 31,

2011 and 2010, the Company had no accruals for interest or penalties related to income tax matters.

Net Loss per Share

Net

loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding. All outstanding warrants, stock options and unvested restricted stock awards totaling 11,284,054,
9,344,635 and 9,428,319 shares at December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively, are excluded from the
computation for 2011, 2010 and 2009, as their effect is anti-dilutive.

Segment Information

The Company manages its business as one operating segment: developing novel, recombinant vaccines.
The Company does not operate separate lines of business with respect to its vaccine candidates. Accordingly,
the Company does not have separately reportable segments as defined by ASC 280, Segment Reporting.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Adopted

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update
(ASU) 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) — Improving Disclosures about Fair
Value Measurements, which amends Topic 820 to add new requirements for disclosures about transfers into
and out of Levels 1 and 2 and separate disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements related to
Level 3 measurements. ASU 2010-06 also clarifies existing fair value disclosures about
the level of
disaggregation and about inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The ASU was effective
for the first reporting period beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the requirements to provide the
Level 3 activity of purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis, which was effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption
was permitted. The 2011 adoption for the requirement to provide the Level 3 activity did not have a material
impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In September 2009, ASU 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) — Multiple-Deliverable Revenue
Arrangements, was issued and changed the accounting for multiple-deliverable arrangements to enable vendors
to account for products or services (deliverables) separately rather than as a combined unit. Specifically, this
guidance amends the criteria in Subtopic 605-25, Revenue Recognition — Multiple-Element Arrangements, for
separating consideration in multiple-deliverable arrangements. This guidance establishes a selling price

F-14

NOVAVAX, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

Note 3 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies − (continued)

hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable, which is based on: (a) vendor-specific objective
evidence; (b) third-party evidence; or (c) estimates. This guidance also eliminates the residual method of
allocation and requires that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all
deliverables using the relative selling price method. In addition, this guidance significantly expands required
disclosures related to a vendor’s multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. ASU 2009-13 became effective
prospectively for multiple deliverable revenue arrangements entered into, or materially modified, on or
after January 1, 2011. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material
impact on the Company’s
financial statements.

In March 2010, ASU 2010-17, Revenue Recognition — Milestone Method (Topic 605): Milestone Method
of Revenue Recognition — a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force, was issued and amended the
accounting for revenue arrangements under which a vendor satisfies its performance obligations to a customer
over a period of time, when the deliverable or unit of accounting is not within the scope of other authoritative
literature and when the arrangement consideration is contingent upon the achievement of a milestone. The
amendment defines a milestone and clarifies whether an entity may recognize consideration earned from the
achievement of a milestone in the period in which the milestone is achieved. ASU 2010-17 became effective
prospectively for milestones achieved within research and development arrangements on or after January 1,
2011. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Not Yet Adopted

In June 2011,

the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of
Comprehensive Income (‘‘ASU 2011-05’’). This guidance is intended to increase the prominence of other
comprehensive income in financial statements by presenting it in either a single-statement or two-statement
approach. This ASU is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2011-05
will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In September 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-08, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other (Topic 350):
Testing Goodwill for Impairment (‘‘ASU 2011-08’’), to give both public and nonpublic entities the option to
qualitatively determine whether they can bypass the two-step goodwill
test. Under the new
guidance, if an entity chooses to perform a qualitative assessment and determines that it is more likely than
not (a more than 50% likelihood) that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, it
would then perform Step 1 of the annual goodwill impairment test in ASC 350-20 and, if necessary, proceed
to Step 2. Otherwise, no further evaluation would be necessary. The decision to perform a qualitative
assessment is made at the reporting unit level, and an entity with multiple reporting units may utilize a mix of
qualitative assessments and quantitative tests among its reporting units. The amended guidance is effective for
interim and annual goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011,
although early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2011-08 will not have a material effect on the
Company’s financial statements.

impairment

Note 4 — U.S. Government Agreement and Collaboration

HHS BARDA Contract Award for Recombinant Influenza Vaccines
In February 2011, the Company was awarded a contract from HHS BARDA valued at $97 million for the
first 36 month base-period, with an HHS BARDA option for an additional period of 24 months valued at
$82 million, for a total contract value of up to $179 million. The HHS BARDA contract award provides
significant funding for the Company’s continued ongoing clinical development and product scale-up of both its
seasonal and pandemic influenza vaccine candidates. This is a cost-plus-fixed-fee contract in which HHS
BARDA will reimburse the Company for direct contract costs incurred plus allowable indirect costs and a fee
earned in the further development of its seasonal and pandemic (H5N1) influenza vaccines. Billings under the
contract are based on approved provisional indirect billing rates, which permit recovery of fringe benefits,
overhead and general and administrative expenses not exceeding certain limits. These indirect rates are subject

F-15

NOVAVAX, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

Note 4 — U.S. Government Agreement and Collaboration − (continued)

to audit by HHS BARDA on an annual basis. When the final determination of the allowable costs for any
year has been made, revenue and billings may be adjusted accordingly. During 2011, the Company recognized
revenue of $14.7 million, made significant progress in product characterization and production scale-up and
are progressing forward with its multi-year clinical development program.

License Agreement with LG Life Sciences, Ltd.

In February 2011,

the Company entered into a License Agreement with LG Life Sciences, Ltd.
(‘‘LGLS’’) that allows LGLS to use the Company’s VLP technology to develop and commercially sell
influenza vaccines exclusively in South Korea and non-exclusively in certain other specified countries. At its
own cost, LGLS is responsible for funding its clinical development of the influenza VLP vaccines and
completing a manufacturing facility in South Korea. The term of the License Agreement is expected to
terminate in 2027. Payments to the Company under the License Agreement include an upfront payment,
reimbursements of certain development and product costs and royalty payments between 10 and 20% from
LGLS’s future commercial sales of influenza VLP vaccines. The upfront payment has been deferred and will
be recognized as revenue when certain obligations in the agreement are satisfied.

Note 5 — Joint Venture

In March 2009, the Company entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with Cadila Pharmaceuticals Ltd., a
private company incorporated under the laws of India (‘‘Cadila’’) pursuant to which the Company and Cadila
formed CPL Biologicals Private Limited, a joint venture (the ‘‘JV’’), of which 20% is owned by the Company
and 80% is owned by Cadila. The JV will develop and manufacture the Company’s seasonal influenza and
pandemic vaccine candidates and Cadila’s biogeneric products and other diagnostic products for the territory
of India. The JV has the right to negotiate a definitive agreement for rights to certain future Company
products (other than RSV) and certain future Cadila products in India, prior to the Company or Cadila
licensing such rights to a third party. The Company has the right to negotiate the licensing of vaccines
developed by the JV using Novavax’s technology for commercialization in every country except for India and
vaccines developed by the JV using Cadila’s technology for commercialization in certain other countries,
including the U.S. Cadila has committed to contribute approximately $8 million over three years to support
the JV’s operations. In connection with the Joint Venture Agreement, in March 2009, the Company also
entered into a license agreement, an option to enter into a license agreement, a technical services agreement
and a supply agreement with the JV and a master services agreement with Cadila. Because the Company does
not control the JV, the Company accounts for its investment using the equity method. Since the carrying value
of the Company’s contribution was nominal and there is no guarantee or commitment to provide future
funding, the Company has not recorded nor expects to record losses related to this investment in the future.

Also in March 2009, the Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with Satellite Overseas
(Holdings) Limited (‘‘SOHL’’), a subsidiary of Cadila, pursuant to which SOHL purchased 12.5 million shares
of the Company’s common stock at
the market price of $0.88 per share, resulting in net proceeds of
approximately $10.6 million.

F-16

NOVAVAX, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

Note 6 — Other Financial Information

Prepaid Expenses

Prepaid expenses consist of the following at December 31 (in thousands):

Laboratory supplies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other prepaid expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Prepaid expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2011
$1,616
825
$2,441

2010
$ 784
558
$1,342

Property and Equipment, net

Property and equipment is comprised of the following at December 31 (in thousands):

Construction in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Machinery and equipment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Leasehold improvements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Computer software and hardware . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Property and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2011

$

56
7,131
4,548
669
12,404
(5,547)
$ 6,857

2010

$

522
6,697
4,531
554
12,304
(4,098)
$ 8,206

Depreciation and amortization expense was approximately $1.6 million, $1.4 million and $1.2 million for

the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following at December 31 (in thousands):

Employee benefits and compensation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research and development accruals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other accrued expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued interest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2011
$2,283
1,213
1,000
32
$4,528

2010
$2,293
3,421
535
24
$6,273

Note 7 — Warrant Liability

In July 2008,

the Company completed a registered direct offering of 6,686,650 units,

raising
approximately $17.5 million in net proceeds. Each unit consisted of one share of common stock and a warrant
to purchase 0.5 shares of common stock (the ‘‘Warrants’’) at a price of $2.68 per unit. The Warrants represent
the right to acquire an aggregate of 3,343,325 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $3.62 per share
and are exercisable through July 31, 2013.

During 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded as other income (expense) in its statements of
operations a change in fair value of warrant
liability of $2.5 million, $1.7 million and ($2.0) million,
respectively. As of December 31, 2011, the warrant liability recorded on the balance sheet was $0.4 million
and all Warrants remain outstanding as of that date under this offering.

F-17

NOVAVAX, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

Note 8 — Long-Term Debt

Notes Payable

Notes payable consist of the following at December 31 (in thousands):

Opportunity Grant Fund notes payable; non-interest bearing; principal only

payments due in monthly installments of $6,667 through April 2012 . . . .
Loan agreements; bear interest at 3% per annum; repayment is conditional .
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less current portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Long-term portion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2011

2010

$ 20
300
320
(20)
$300

$100
300
400
(80)
$320

Opportunity Grant Fund Note Payable

In April 2007, the Company entered into a Settlement and Release Agreement with the Commonwealth
of Pennsylvania, whereby the Company agreed to repay the original grant of $400,000 associated with its
former corporate headquarters and product development activities in Malvern, Pennsylvania in 60 monthly
installments of $6,667 each starting May 2007. Interest does not accrue on the outstanding balance.

Loan Agreements

In May 2008, the Company entered into loan agreements with the State of Maryland and Montgomery
County whereby the repayment of the loan amounts and accrued interest is conditioned upon the Company
meeting the capital investment and employment requirements during the term of the loans through 2014,
as amended.

Aggregate future minimum principal payments on long-term debt at December 31, 2011 are as follows

(in thousands):

Year
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total minimum principal payments. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Amount
$ 20
—
300
$320

Note 9 — Sales of Common Stock

In March 2010, the Company entered into an At Market Issuance Sales Agreement under which the
Company may sell an aggregate of $50 million of gross proceeds of the Company’s common stock. The
Company’s Board of Directors authorized the sale of up to 25 million shares of common stock pursuant to the
At Market Issuance Sales Agreement. In 2011, the Company sold 6,001,841 shares at sales prices ranging
from $1.25 − $2.75 and received net proceeds of $11.8 million (with $0.8 million received in early 2012)
under the At Market Issuance Sales Agreement. In 2010, the Company sold 10,513,849 shares at a range of
$2.10 − $2.55 and received net proceeds of $23.1 million under the At Market Issuance Sales Agreement.
Since entering into the At Market Issuance Sales Agreement
the Company has sold
21,053,564 shares and received gross proceeds of $42.1 million through March 8, 2012.

in March 2010,

F-18

NOVAVAX, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

Note 10 — Stockholders’ Equity

On August 7, 2002, the Company adopted a Shareholder Rights Plan, which provides for the issuance of
rights to purchase shares of Series D Junior Participating Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share
(the ‘‘Preferred Shares’’), of the Company. Under the Shareholder Rights Plan, the Company distributed
one preferred share purchase right (a ‘‘Right’’) for each outstanding share of common stock of the Company.
The Rights were distributed to stockholders of record on August 16, 2002.

Each Right entitles the holder to purchase from the Company one-thousandth of a Preferred Share at a
price of $40, subject to adjustment. The Rights become exercisable, with certain exceptions, 10 business days
after any party, without prior approval of the Board of Directors, acquires or announces an offer to acquire
beneficial ownership of 15% or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock. In the event that any
party acquires 15% or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock, the Company enters into a merger
or other business combination, or if a substantial amount of the Company’s assets are sold after the time that
the Rights become exercisable, the Rights provide that the holder will receive, upon exercise, shares of the
common stock of the surviving or acquiring company, as applicable, having a market value of twice the
exercise price of the Right.

The Rights expire August 7, 2012, and are redeemable by the Company at a price of $0.00025 per Right
at any time prior to the time that any party acquires 15% or more of the Company’s outstanding common
stock. Until the earlier of the time that the Rights become exercisable, are redeemed or expire, the Company
will issue one Right with each new share of common stock issued.

Note 11 — Stock-Based Compensation

The Company has granted equity awards under several plans. Under the 2005 Stock Incentive Plan
(the ‘‘2005 Plan’’), equity awards may be granted to officers, directors, employees, consultants and advisors to
the Company and any present or future subsidiary. The 2005 Plan, approved in May 2005 and amended in
June 2007 and June 2011 by the Company’s stockholders, currently authorizes the grant of equity awards for
up to 14,312,192 shares of common stock, which included, at the time of approval of the 2005 Plan, a
maximum 5,746,468 shares of common stock subject to stock options outstanding under the Company’s
1995 Stock Option Plan (the ‘‘1995 Plan’’) that may revert to and become issuable under the 2005 Plan if
such options should expire or otherwise terminate unexercised. The term of the Company’s 1995 Plan has
expired. Outstanding stock options remain in existence in accordance with their terms and no new awards will
be made under the 1995 Plan.

Under the 2005 Plan and the 1995 Plan, incentive stock options, having a maximum term of 10 years,
can be or were granted at no less than 100% of the fair value of the Company’s common stock at the time of
grant and are generally exercisable over periods ranging from six months to four years. There is no minimum
exercise price for non-statutory stock options.

The Company recorded stock-based compensation expense in the statements of operations as follows

(in thousands):

Research and development . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
General and administrative. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total stock-based compensation expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

F-19

Years ended December 31,
2010
$ 335
1,004
$1,339

2009
$ 539
994
$1,533

2011
$ 610
1,437
$2,047

NOVAVAX, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

Note 11 — Stock-Based Compensation − (continued)

Stock Options Awards

The following is a summary of option activity under the 2005 Plan and the 1995 Plan for the year ended

December 31, 2011:

Outstanding at January 1, 2011 . . . . .
Granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Exercised . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Canceled . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Outstanding at December 31, 2011. . .

Vested and expected to vest at

2005 Stock Incentive Plan
Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
$2.34
$2.08
$0.90
$2.54
$2.22

Stock Options
5,214,794
3,625,400
(198,679)
(1,228,769)
7,412,746

1995 Stock Option Plan

Stock Options
579,850
—
—
(105,200)
474,650

Weighted-
Average
Exercise Price
$4.97
$ —
$ —
$7.81
$4.38

December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . .

6,653,550

$2.25

474,650

$4.38

Shares exercisable at December 31,

2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3,705,448

$2.39

474,650

$4.38

Shares available for grant at

December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . .

3,311,224

The fair value of the stock options granted for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, was

estimated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

Weighted average fair value of

options granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Risk-free interest rate . . . . . . . . . . . .
Dividend yield . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Volatility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expected term (in years). . . . . . . . . .
Expected forfeiture rate . . . . . . . . . .

2011

2010

2009

$1.14
0.48% − 1.91%
0%
73.3% − 81.0%
3.26 − 4.47
0 − 23.15%

$1.47
0.93% − 2.89%
0%
97.0% − 108.0%
3.06 − 6.26
21.07%

$1.29
1.56% − 3.19%
0%
85.7% − 119.5%
3.89 − 7.05
21.07%

The aggregate intrinsic value and weighted-average remaining contractual

term of stock options
exercisable as of December 31, 2011 was approximately $0.2 million and 3.8 years, respectively. The
aggregate intrinsic value and weighted-average remaining contractual term of options vested and expected to
vest as of December 31, 2011 was $0.3 million and 7.0 years, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value
represents the total intrinsic value (the difference between the Company’s closing stock price on the last
trading day of 2011 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would
have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on December 31,
2011. This amount is subject to change based on changes to the fair market value of the Company’s common
stock. The aggregate intrinsic value of options exercised for 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $0.3 million,
$0.3 million and $0.9 million, respectively.

F-20

NOVAVAX, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

Note 11 — Stock-Based Compensation − (continued)

Restricted Stock Awards

Under the 2005 Plan, the Company granted restricted stock awards subject to certain performance-based
or time-based vesting conditions which, if not met, would result in forfeiture of the shares and reversal of any
previously recognized related stock-based compensation expense.

The following is a summary of restricted stock awards activity for the year ended December 31, 2011:

Outstanding at January 1, 2011. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restricted stock granted . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restricted stock vested . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Restricted stock forfeited . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Outstanding at December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Per Share
Weighted-
Average
Grant-Date
Fair Value
$2.47
$1.39
$2.30
$ —
$1.63

Number of
Shares
56,666
50,000
(53,333)
—
53,333

As of December 31, 2011, there was approximately $3.0 million of total unrecognized compensation
expense (net of estimated forfeitures)
related to unvested options and restricted stock awards. This
unrecognized compensation expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.6 years.

Note 12 — Employee Benefits

The Company maintains a defined contribution 401(k) retirement plan, pursuant to which employees who
have completed 90 days of service may elect to contribute up to 100% of their compensation on a tax
deferred basis up to the maximum amount permitted by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

The Company currently matches 25% of the first 6% of the participants’ deferral. Contributions to the
forfeitures,

401(k) plan vest equally over a three-year period. The Company has expensed, net of
approximately $88,000, $71,000 and $37,000 in 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Note 13 — Therapeutic Tax Credit

In 2010, the Company submitted applications for qualifying therapeutic discovery project credits under
§48D of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended (the ‘‘Code’’), as added to the Code by section 9023(a) of
the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, and was awarded grants totaling $1.0 million, of
which $0.2 million was refunded due to a shortfall in qualified expenses relating to one of its applications.

Note 14 — Income Taxes

The Company recorded a current income tax expense for foreign taxes of $0.4 million in 2011, and a
deferred federal income tax benefit of $0.5 million in 2010. The components of the income tax provision
(benefit) are as follows (in thousands):

Current U.S. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Current foreign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net provision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2011
$ —
412
—
$412

2010
$ —
—
(450)
$(450)

2009
$ —
—
—
$ —

F-21

NOVAVAX, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

Note 14 — Income Taxes − (continued)

Deferred tax assets (liabilities) consist of the following at December 31 (in thousands):

Net operating losses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research tax credits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total deferred tax liabilities. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net deferred tax assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Less valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Deferred tax assets, net

2011
$ 116,492
5,904
3,974
126,370
(350)
(350)
126,020
(126,020)
—

$

2010
$ 99,999
4,924
3,290
108,213
(209)
(209)
108,004
(108,004)
—

$

The differences between the U.S. federal statutory tax rate and the Company’s effective tax rate are

as follows:

Statutory federal tax rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
State income taxes, net of federal benefit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research and development credit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Expiration of net operating losses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Change in valuation allowance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

2011
(34)%
(9)%
(5)%
10%
(3)%
43%
2%

2010
(34)%
(4)%
(2)%
4%
(1)%
36%
(1)%

2009
(34)%
—%
(1)%
—%
(4)%
39%
—%

Realization of net deferred tax assets is dependent on the Company’s ability to generate future taxable
income, which is uncertain. Accordingly, a full valuation allowance was recorded against these assets as of
December 31, 2011 and 2010 as management believes it is more likely than not that the assets will not
be realizable.

During 2011, the Company incurred a $0.4 million foreign withholding tax related to a payment received
in accordance with a license agreement. This withholding tax gives rise to an increase to the U.S. net
operating loss for which a full valuation allowance has been recorded. During the year ended December 31,
2010, as a result of new legislation allowing for the partial refund of research and development credits, the
Company requested and received a refund of approximately $0.1 million. In addition, during the year ended
December 31, 2010, the Company received grants totaling $0.8 million for qualifying therapeutic discovery
projects under
the refundable research and
development credits and the Internal Revenue Code Section 48D grant resulted in the Company recording a
deferred federal income tax benefit of $0.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2010.

Internal Revenue Code Section 48D. The combination of

As of December 31, 2011, the Company had tax return reported federal net operating losses and tax

credits available as follows (in thousands):

Federal net operating losses expiring through the year 2031 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Research tax credits expiring through the year 2031 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Alternative-minimum tax credit (no expiration) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Amount
$287,533
6,523
94

F-22

NOVAVAX, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

Note 14 — Income Taxes − (continued)

Utilization of the net operating loss carryforwards and credits may be subject to a substantial annual
limitation due to the ownership change limitations provided by the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as
amended, and similar state provisions. The Company has not performed a detailed analysis to determine
whether an ownership change under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code occurred. The effect of an
ownership change would be the imposition of an annual
limitation on the use of net operating loss
carryforwards and credits attributable to periods before the change and could result in a reduction in the total
net operating losses and credits available.

Beginning in 2006,

the windfall equity-based compensation deductions are tracked, but will not be
recorded to the balance sheet until management determines more likely than not that such amounts will be
utilized. During 2011 and 2010, the Company had $0.1 million and $0 million, respectively, of windfall stock
compensation deductions. If and when realized,
the tax benefit associated with these deductions will be
credited to additional paid-in capital. These excess benefit deductions are included in the total federal net
operating losses disclosed above.

Tabular Reconciliation of Unrecognized Tax Benefits (in thousands):

Unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross increases − tax positions in prior period. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross decreases − tax position in prior period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross increases − current-period tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increases (decreases) from settlements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross increases − tax positions in prior period. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross decreases − tax position in prior period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Gross increases − current-period tax positions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Increases (decreases) from settlements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Amount
$4,859
105
(54)
—
—
$4,910
—
(35)
—
—
$4,875

To the extent
effective income tax rate.

these unrecognized tax benefits are ultimately recognized,

it would affect

the annual

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and in various states. The Company
had tax net operating losses and credit carryforwards that are subject to examination for a number of years
beyond the year in which they are generated for tax purposes. Since a portion of these carryforwards may be
utilized in the future, many of these attribute carryforwards remain subject to examination.

The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax
expense. As of December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, the Company had no accruals for interest or
penalties related to income tax matters.

F-23

NOVAVAX, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

Note 15 — Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Leases

The Company conducts its operations from leased facilities, under operating leases with terms expiring
through 2023, in Rockville/Gaithersburg, Maryland. The leases obligate the Company to also pay building
operating costs. In November 2011, the Company entered into lease agreements, under which the Company
will lease its new manufacturing, laboratory and office space in Gaithersburg, Maryland. The lease agreements
provide that, among other things, as of January 1, 2012, the Company subleases from the current facility
tenant, and subsequently leases from the landlord approximately 74,000 total square feet, with rent payments
for such space commencing April 1, 2014. Under the terms of one lease agreement, the Landlord will provide
the Company with a tenant improvement allowance of $2.5 million and an additional tenant improvement
allowance of $3 million dollars, which additional tenant improvement allowance is paid back to the Landlord
during the remainder of the term of such lease agreement (collectively, the ‘‘Improvement Allowance’’). Since
December 31, 2011 through March 8, 2012,
the
Improvement Allowance. In addition, the Company entered into an agreement with the current facility tenant
to purchase laboratory equipment to be used at the space. The Company is currently considering its plans for
the Rockville, Maryland facility subsequent to relocation to the Gaithersburg, Maryland facilities, which plans
include remarketing the facility through the end of the remaining lease term of January 31, 2017. The
Company also leased space in Malvern, Pennsylvania, its former corporate headquarters, under an operating
lease with a term expiring in 2014. The Company has subleased this facility under an amended sublease
agreement expiring in 2014.

the Company has been funded $1.3 million under

Future minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable leases as of December 31, 2011 are as

follows (in thousands):

Year
2012 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2013 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2014 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2015 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total minimum lease payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Operating
Leases
$ 2,680
2,179
3,549
3,925
4,023
15,268
$31,624

Sublease
$(288)
(295)
(201)
—
—
—
$(784)

Net Operating
Leases
$ 2,392
1,884
3,348
3,925
4,023
15,268
$30,840

Total rent expenses approximated $1.6 million, $1.6 million and $1.5 million for the years ended

December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Purchase Obligations

In March 2009, the Company and Cadila entered into a master services agreement pursuant to which the
Company may request services from Cadila in the areas of biologics research, pre-clinical development,
clinical development, process development, manufacturing scale-up and general manufacturing related services
in India. In July 2011, the Company and Cadila amended the master services agreement to extend the term by
one year for which services can be provided by Cadila under this agreement. Under the revised terms, if, by
March 31, 2013, the amount of services provided by Cadila is less than $7.5 million, the Company will pay
Cadila the portion of the shortfall amount that is less than or equal to $2.0 million and 50% of the portion of
the shortfall amount that exceeds $2.0 million. When calculating the shortfall, the amount of services provided
by Cadila includes amounts that have been paid under all project plans, the amounts that will be paid under
ongoing executed project plans and amounts for services that had been offered to Cadila, that Cadila was
capable of performing, but exercised its right not to accept such project. The term of the master services
agreement is five years, but may be terminated by either party if there is a material breach that is not cured

F-24

NOVAVAX, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

Note 15 — Commitments and Contingencies − (continued)

within 30 days of notice or, at any time after three years, provided that 90 days prior notice is given to the
the Company’s remaining obligation to Cadila under the master
other party. As of December 31, 2011,
services agreement is $7.3 million.

Contingencies

License Agreement with Wyeth Holdings Corporation

The Company entered into a license agreement in 2007 with Wyeth Holdings Corporation, a subsidiary
of Pfizer Inc. (‘‘Wyeth’’). The license is a non-exclusive, worldwide license to a family of patent applications
covering VLP technology for use in human vaccines in certain fields. The agreement provides for an upfront
payment, annual license fees, milestone payments and royalties on any product sales. If each milestone is
achieved for any particular vaccine candidate, the Company would be obligated to pay an aggregate of
$14 million to Wyeth for each product developed and commercialized under the agreement. Annual license
maintenance fees under the agreement total $0.2 million per annum. The royalty to be paid by the Company
under the agreement, if a product is approved by the FDA for commercialization, will be based on single digit
percentage of net sales. Payments under the agreement
to Wyeth as of December 31, 2011 aggregated
$5.1 million. The agreement will remain effective as long as at least one claim of the licensed patent rights
cover the manufacture, sale or use of any product unless terminated sooner at the Company’s option or by
Wyeth for an uncured breach by the Company.

Employment Agreements

The Company has entered into employment agreements with certain of its executive officers and key
employees. The employment agreements have one year terms that automatically renew annually and provide
for base salaries and other incentives. The agreements include a provision whereby if the Company terminates
the employment of such an employee other than for cause, including pursuant to a change of control under its
severance plan, or the employee leaves the Company for good reason, such employee shall be entitled to
receive payment of existing salary and benefits for a period that ranges from 12 to 24 months.

Note 16 — Related Party Transactions

Dr. Rajiv Modi, a director of Novavax, is also a managing director of Cadila. The Company and Cadila
have formed a joint venture called CPL Biologicals Private Limited, of which the Company owns 20% and
Cadila owns 80%. The Company and Cadila also have entered into a master services agreement, pursuant to
which Cadila may perform certain research, development and manufacturing services for the Company up to
$7.5 million. A subsidiary of Cadila owns 12.5 million shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock.
Since entering into the master services agreement and through December 31, 2011, the Company has incurred
$0.2 million under the agreement. During 2010, the Company was reimbursed by the JV for travel and
administrative costs and services provided to the JV totaling $0.2 million. The reimbursement of these costs
and services was recorded as a reduction to operating expenses. In addition, in 2010, the Company purchased
from the JV laboratory equipment
the Company recorded
$0.1 million as a payable to Cadila.

for $0.2 million. At December 31, 2011,

In September 2011, the Company executed agreements with Mr. Mitchell Kelly and Dr. Denis O’Donnell,
two of the Company’s former directors, to settle litigation initiated by the Company in 2010 to collect on
outstanding notes to the Company, and in each case the lawsuit was dismissed with prejudice and the pledged
shares of Common Stock were surrendered to the Company. As reflected on the Company’s balance sheet, the
remaining notes receivable were eliminated with a corresponding reduction in common stock and additional
paid-in capital as of December 31, 2011.

F-25

NOVAVAX, INC.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009

Note 17 — Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)

The Company’s unaudited quarterly information for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 is

as follows:

2011:
Revenue. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Net loss per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Quarter Ended

March 31

June 30

September 30

December 31

(in thousands, except per share data)

$
834
$(7,453)

$ (0.07)

$ 3,001
$(4,993)

$ (0.04)

$ 5,008
$(3,212)

$ (0.03)

$ 5,845
$(3,705)

$ (0.03)

Quarter Ended

March 31

June 30

September 30

December 31

(in thousands, except per share data)

2010:
Revenue. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Net loss per share . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$
110
$(10,343)
(0.10)
$

$
7
$(8,857)
$ (0.09)

$
175
$(10,222)
(0.10)
$

$
51
$(6,286)
$ (0.06)

The net income (loss) per share was calculated for each three-month period on a stand-alone basis. As a
result, the sum of the net income (loss) per share for the four quarters may not equal the net income (loss) per
share for the respective twelve-month period.

F-26

NOVAVAX, INC.

SCHEDULE II — VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009
(in thousands)

Net Deferred Tax Asset Valuation Allowance:

2011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
2009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

$108,004
94,853
80,799

$18,016
13,151
14,054

$—
—
—

Balance at
Beginning
of Year

Additions

Deductions

Balance at
End of Year

$126,020
108,004
94,853

[This page intentionally left blank.] 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Artists’ rendition of three-dimensional structure of Novavax’s influenza virus-like particle (“VLP”)

Novavax, Inc. (Nasdaq: NVAX) is a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company creating novel 

vaccines to address a broad range of infectious diseases worldwide. Using innovative virus-like 

particle (VLP) and recombinant nanoparticle vaccine technology, as well as new and efficient 

manufacturing approaches, the company produces novel vaccine candidates to combat 

diseases, with the goal of allowing countries to better prepare for and more effectively respond 

to rapidly spreading infections. Novavax is committed to using its technology platforms to 

create geographic-specific vaccine solutions and is therefore involved in several international 

partnerships, including collaborations with Cadila Pharmaceuticals of India and LG Life Sciences of 

Korea.  Together, these companies have worldwide commercialization capacity and the global reach 

to create real and lasting change in the biopharmaceutical field.  Additional information about 

Novavax is available on the company’s website: www.novavax.com.

Corporate INformatIoN

Executive Management

Board of Directors

Stanley C. Erck
President and Chief Executive Officer

Gregory M. Glenn, M.D.
Senior Vice President and Chief Medical Officer

Timothy J. Hahn, Ph.D.
Senior Vice President, Manufacturing and  
Process Development

Russell P. Wilson
Senior Vice President, Business Development

Frederick W. Driscoll
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Louis F. Fries III, M.D.
Vice President, Clinical and Medical Affairs

Jane L. Halpern, Ph.D.
Vice President, Regulatory Affairs

Mervyn L. Hamer
Vice President, Manufacturing

John A. Herrmann III, J.D.
Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary

Erica S. Shane, Ph.D.
Vice President, Process Development

Gale E. Smith, Ph.D.
Vice President, Vaccine Development

James F. Young, Ph.D.
Chairman of the Board
Former President, Research and Development of  
Medimmune, Inc.

Richard H. Douglas, Ph.D.
Former Senior Vice President, Corporate Development,  
Genzyme Corporation 

Stanley C. Erck
President and Chief Executive Officer of Novavax, Inc.

Gary C. Evans
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Magnum Hunter
Resources Corporation and GreenHunter Energy, Inc.

John O. Marsh, Jr., J.D.
Distinguished Adjunct Professor of Law,
George Mason University, former Secretary of the Army 
and U.S. Congressional Representative

Michael A. McManus, Jr., J.D.
President and Chief Executive Officer of Misonix, Inc.

Rajiv I. Modi, Ph.D.
Managing Director of Cadila Pharmaceuticals, Ltd.

Outside Legal Counsel

Corporate Headquarters

Ropes & Gray LLP, Boston, MA  

Auditors

Grant Thornton LLP, McLean, VA 

Transfer Agent

Computershare, Canton, MA

Safe Harbor Notice

Novavax, Inc.
9920 Belward Campus Drive

Rockville, Maryland 20850

Tel: 240 268 2000

www.novavax.com

NaSDaQ: NVaX

Statements herein relating to the ongoing development of Novavax products, including references to contracts and partnerships, are 

forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Novavax cautions that forward-looking 

statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties, which change over time (“Risk Factors”). Risk Factors that may 

cause actual results to differ materially from the results discussed in any forward-looking statements are discussed in this Annual Report 

and are also contained in Novavax’s filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, available at www.sec.gov.

PRN_1203043__Novavax_AR2012.indd   3-4

4/18/12   2:34 PM

!LipidEnvelopeNeuraminidase(NA)Hemagglutinin(HA)Matrix(M1) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2011Annual Report

PRN_1203043__Novavax_AR2012.indd   1-2

4/18/12   2:34 PM

www.novavax.com