ObsEva Annual Report 2016

← All annual reports

FY2016 Annual Report · ObsEva

Loading PDF…

Annual Report 2016

Table of Contents

Letter to Shareholders…………………………………………………………………...

Business Update…………………………………………………………………………

Financial Review………………………………………………………………………..

Corporate Governance…………………………………………………………………..

Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016………

• Report from the Auditor…………………………………………………………………

Statutory Financial Statements of ObsEva SA for the year ended December 31, 2016… 101

• Report from the Auditor………………………………………………………………… 109

Forward-Looking Statements……………………………………………………………. 113

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Letter to shareholders

DEAR SHAREHOLDERS,

As we look back on the year of 2016, we recognize the significant progress that was made in
our development programs and implementation of our corporate strategy, ultimately
culminating in our initial public offering (IPO) on the U.S. NASDAQ exchange in early 2017.

We have a rich pipeline of three New Chemical Entities with our lead asset OBE2109 pursuing
two important indications in Endometriosis and Uterine Fibroids. We continue to make great
progress on all of our assets as noted by the major clinical milestones we reached for all three
development programs in 2016. For our lead asset OBE2109, we began a phase2b clinical trial
for the treatment of endometriosis, our EDELWEISS study. Our progress in 2016 has
positioned us to complete enrolment of the EDELWEISS study in late 2017. Our preliminary
work supporting the Uterine Fibroid indication in 2016 has enabled us to initiate our Phase 3
program in 2017, the PRIMROSE 1 and 2 studies. Our second asset is Nolasiban (OBE001),
for use in assisted reproduction during in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures, and we
completed a Phase 2 study in 2016. This led us to initiate our Phase 3 study in 2017. And
finally for our third asset, OBE022 for the treatment of pre-term labor, we conducted pre-
clinical work and a Phase 1 human trial in 2016, setting the foundation for initiating a phase 2
trial in 2017.

We continue to focus on our strategy of becoming a Women’s Health leader by bringing
innovative treatments to physicians and patients that improve upon the efficacy, tolerability
and safety of existing therapeutic alternatives. We are committed to building significant long
term value for our shareholders by remaining focused on achieving our clinical development
milestones with judicious use of our capital. We would like to thank our shareholders,
employees and partners for their unwavering support.

Frank Verwiel
Chairman

Ernest Loumaye
CEO

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of novel
therapeutics for serious conditions that compromise a woman’s reproductive health and pregnancy. We are advancing a
pipeline of orally-administered innovative new chemical entities, or NCEs, for the treatment of symptoms associated with
endometriosis and uterine fibroids, improvement of clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in women undergoing IVF and
treatment of preterm labor. We have assembled a strong management team with extensive experience in successfully
developing and commercializing therapeutics in our target market. Our goal is to build the leading women’s reproductive
health and pregnancy company focused on conditions where current treatment options are limited and significant unmet
needs exist.

We were founded in November 2012 by former executives of PregLem SA, or PregLem, a Swiss-based specialty
biopharmaceutical company dedicated to the development and commercialization of innovative drugs for women’s
reproductive medicine. While at PregLem, our senior management team collaborated in the clinical development and
commercialization of several women’s reproductive health therapeutics, including Esmya (ulipristal acetate) for the
treatment of uterine fibroids. PregLem was subsequently acquired by Gedeon Richter in 2010. We believe we will be able
to leverage our senior management team’s long-standing experience working together and with key opinion leaders, patient
groups, payors, reproductive health networks, fertility clinics, obstetricians and gynecologists, or OB/GYNs, nurses and
pharmacists to identify, in-license or acquire, develop and commercialize product candidates. We are merging our passion
for, and extensive experience in, the field of women’s reproductive health and pregnancy, to develop therapeutics that can
help women lead more healthy and fulfilling lives.

We are focused on providing therapeutic solutions for women between the ages of 15 and 49 who suffer from reproductive
health conditions that affect their quality of life, ability to conceive or that complicate pregnancy and the health of
newborns. There are millions of women of reproductive age affected by conditions such as endometriosis, uterine fibroids
and preterm labor, or that require IVF to conceive. We believe the efficacy of current treatment options is limited and
creates a significant unmet need for improved therapeutics for these women. The graphic below depicts the segments and
associated characteristics of the therapeutic market for women’s reproductive health products:

* IMS Health Incorporated estimate as of 2015.

Our portfolio currently consists of three in-licensed NCEs in clinical development for four indications intended to address
areas that we believe present significant unmet medical needs:

• OBE2109 for the treatment of pain associated with endometriosis and heavy menstrual bleeding associated

with uterine fibroids. We are developing OBE2109 as a novel, oral GnRH receptor antagonist, for the
treatment of pain associated with endometriosis and heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids
in pre-menopausal women. Endometriosis is an often painful disorder in which the tissue that normally lines

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

the inside of the uterus, called the endometrium, grows outside of the uterus, causing monthly bleeding and
chronic inflammatory reactions inside the abdomen that may result in ovarian cyst formation, scar tissue and
adhesions. The symptoms of endometriosis include significant pain during menstrual periods, chronic pelvic
pain, pain during intercourse, excessive menstrual bleeding and infertility. These symptoms can impact general
physical, mental and social well-being. As of 2014, we believe that approximately 2.5 million women in the
United States were diagnosed and being treated for endometriosis and that the majority of those women
experience significant pain during menstrual periods. Uterine fibroids are common non-cancerous tumors that
develop in the muscular wall of the uterus and have disabling symptoms such as heavy menstrual bleeding.
According to a study published in the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology in 2003, uterine fibroids
affect an estimated 20 to 40% of women over the age of 30 in the United States based on clinical cases and
women who undergo treatment.

In previous Phase 1 and Phase 2 clinical trials, OBE2109 was observed to have a linear PK profile, a
predictable dose-dependent suppression of estradiol and a dose range that was well-tolerated and provided
symptom relief. Aimed at addressing the need of the largest possible population in each indication, our clinical
trials for both of these indications are designed to assess and potentially support the registration of two
regimens of administrations for OBE2109 i.e. (i) a moderate dose of OBE2109 without add-back therapy and
(ii) a high dose of OBE2109 with add-back therapy. We are currently conducting a multiple-dose, placebo-
controlled Phase 2b clinical trial of OBE2109 in patients with endometriosis, with a target enrollment of 330
patients, which we refer to as the EDELWEISS trial. We expect to report data from the first 24-week
evaluation period of the EDELWEISS trial in the first half of 2018. For the uterine fibroids indication, we plan
to perform a Phase 1 PK and PD clinical trial to assess two different doses of add-back therapy in patients
receiving 100 mg and 200 mg doses of OBE2109 over six weeks. We expect that the results of this clinical
trial, which we expect to receive in the first half of 2017, will confirm the selection of the add-back therapy
dose or doses planned in the two randomized, placebo-controlled Phase 3 clinical trials that we intend to
commence in the first half of 2017. We refer to these Phase 3 clinical trials of OBE2109 in patients with heavy
menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids as the PRIMROSE clinical trials. The PRIMROSE clinical
trials will each have a target enrollment of approximately 500 patients. We expect to report data from the
PRIMROSE clinical trials in the first half of 2020. We believe OBE2109, if approved in either indication, has
the potential to be a best-in-class oral GnRH receptor antagonist based on its favorable PK and PD profiles, and
its expected balance between safety and efficacy. We expect OBE2109 to potentially reduce pain symptoms
associated with endometriosis and heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids, while mitigating
bone mineral density loss and other adverse effects associated with excessive estradiol suppression. Further, we
believe that OBE2109 has the potential to offer personalized dosing that can be tailored to a patient’s
individual response. Finally, we believe OBE2109 has certain advantageous characteristics including the
absence of food effect, high bioavailability, low volume of distribution, and low PK and PD variability. We
believe these characteristics could be key product differentiators compared to other GnRH receptor antagonists
in clinical development.

• Nolasiban to improve IVF outcome. We are developing nolasiban, an oral oxytocin receptor antagonist, to
improve clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in women undergoing IVF. Infertility is a disease of the
reproductive system that impairs the body’s ability to perform the basic function of reproduction. IVF helps
women achieve pregnancy through the collection of mature eggs in the ovaries, followed by fertilization and
early embryo development in the laboratory before transfer of the embryos into the womb. In Europe,
approximately 620,000 IVF treatments were performed in 2012, and in the United States, approximately
210,000 IVF treatments were performed in 2014. We believe that nolasiban, if approved, could represent a
compelling option for increasing IVF outcomes, which, based on current treatments, only has an overall live
birth rate of approximately 33% in the United States and 21% in Europe. In 2016, we completed our 247-
patient Phase 2 clinical trial of nolasiban in women undergoing IVF. Nolasiban did not reach the primary
endpoint of a statistically significant increase in pregnancy rate at six weeks after embryo transfer, or ET. In
our post-hoc analysis of the data, which excluded patients with progesterone levels in the top quartile of the
patient pool, we identified a statistically significant dose-proportional increase in pregnancy rate at 10 weeks
and live birth rate. We believe that high progesterone levels can lead to a premature closing of the embryo
implantation window. We initiated a European Phase 3 clinical trial, which we refer as IMPLANT2, in women
undergoing IVF in March 2017 and expect to report data for the primary endpoint in the second quarter of
2018.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

• OBE022 for the treatment of preterm labor (GA 24-34 weeks). We are developing OBE022, an oral and

selective prostaglandin F2, or PGF2 , receptor antagonist, as a once daily treatment for preterm labor from 24
to 34 weeks gestational age, or GA. PGF2 is a naturally occurring prostaglandin, or active lipid compound, that
acts to induce labor. Preterm labor, defined as the body commencing the birthing process prior to 37 weeks, is
characterized by uterine contractions, cervical dilation and rupture of the fetal membranes that surround and
protect the fetus during pregnancy. Preterm labor can lead to preterm birth, which is currently the leading
worldwide cause of death of newborn babies. According to the National Center for Health Statistics,
approximately 9.6% of babies in the United States were born preterm in 2014. Through specific antagonism of
the PGF2 receptor, OBE022 is designed to control preterm labor by reducing inflammation, decreasing uterine
contractions and preventing cervical changes and fetal membrane ruptures. At the Society for Reproductive
Investigations’ 64th Annual Scientific Meeting in March 2017, we presented results of a non-clinical study in
which we observed that OBE022 exerted a synergistic effect in combination with nifedipine on the delay of
delivery in an animal model for preterm labor. Based on its PK profile and efficacy observed in animal models,
we believe OBE022 has the potential to become a first-in-class therapy to suppress preterm labor and delay or
avoid preterm birth, without significant safety concerns for the fetus. In February 2017, we completed a Phase
1 clinical trial assessing the safety, tolerability and PK profile of OBE022 in healthy post-menopausal female
volunteers after single doses of 10 mg to 1,300 mg and multiple doses between 100 mg per day and 1,000 mg
per day over 7 consecutive days. In this trial, OBE022 was observed to have a favorable PK profile, no
clinically significant food effect, a favorable safety profile and to be well-tolerated at doses up to 1,300 mg
after single dose administration and up to 1,000 mg per day after multiple dose administration over 7 days,
each of which are above the estimated clinical effective dose. In March 2017, we completed a set of drug-drug
interaction, or DDI, Phase 1 clinical pharmacology studies investigating the safety, tolerability and PK profile
of OBE022 when combined with magnesium sulfate, atosiban, nifedipine or betamethasone (medications
typically used in patients with preterm labor) in pre-menopausal female volunteers. OBE022 in combination
with those drugs was observed to have a favorable safety profile and to be well-tolerated up to 1,100 mg per
day, which was the highest tested dose.

The following table summarizes key information regarding our current product candidates:

We are also evaluating additional indications for our current product candidates as well as opportunities to in-license or
acquire additional product candidates in our therapeutic field.

Our executive team has substantial experience in developing and commercializing pharmaceutical products in this field.
For example, Ernest Loumaye, M.D., Ph.D., OB/GYN, our Chief Executive Officer and co-founder, is a board certified and
academically trained OB/GYN with extensive experience developing therapeutics for women’s health and over 90
publications in peer-reviewed journals. Most recently he was the Chief Executive Officer and Co-Founder of PregLem.
Prior to PregLem, Dr. Loumaye spent nine years as Head of Clinical Development for Reproductive Health at Serono, now
Merck Serono, where he led the worldwide clinical development and contributed to the worldwide registration of Gonal-F,
Luveris and Ovidrel.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

In addition, Jean-Pierre Gotteland, Ph.D., our Chief Scientific Officer, and Elke Bestel M.D., our Chief Medical Officer
held the same roles at PregLem where they worked with Dr. Loumaye for six years and successfully in-licensed, developed
and registered a first-in-class product, Esmya (ulipristal acetate), for the treatment of uterine fibroids.

Collectively, our management team has led the clinical development or contributed to the worldwide registration of three
market-leading fertility products at Serono, Gonal-F, Luveris and Ovidrel, as well as other products including Esmya,
Puregon Pen, Implanon, NuvaRing and Evamist. In addition, members of our management team bring pharmaceutical
development, regulatory approval, manufacturing, reimbursement and commercialization experience from other
pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, including Merck Serono, Organon, Allergan, Pierre Fabre, Novartis Pharma
AG, Roche, SmithKline Beecham, Shire, Galderma, Speedel, Evolva SA and Acrux.

We have demonstrated an ability to successfully execute on the first part of our strategy by leveraging our extensive
network in the field of women’s reproductive health and pregnancy to in-license OBE2109 from Kissei and nolasiban and
OBE022 from Merck Serono. Additionally, we have raised $93.2 million in equity financing from inception to
December 31, 2016 from leading healthcare investors, including HBM Healthcare Investments, New Enterprise Associates,
Novo A/S, OrbiMed, Sofinnova Partners and Sofinnova Ventures.

Our Strengths

We believe our clinical and product development experience in the field of women’s reproductive health and pregnancy
provides us with the following strengths:

• Strategic focus on diseases in women’s reproductive health and pregnancy that affect growing female

populations with high unmet medical needs and significant commercial potential;

• Three product candidates with clear mechanisms of action and early evidence of efficacy that have the potential

to progress into and through late-stage clinical trials;

• Management with substantial experience working together and developing and commercializing

pharmaceutical products in the field of women’s reproductive health and pregnancy;

• Strong industry and key opinion leader relationships in the field of women’s reproductive health and pregnancy
that provide access to potential product in-licensing opportunities and product development experience; and

•

Support from leading healthcare-focused investors and board members with experience in building and
operating life science companies.

Our Strategy

Our goal is to build the leading women’s reproductive health and pregnancy company focused on conditions where current
treatment options are limited and significant unmet needs exist. The key elements of our strategy include the following:

• Continue to advance each of our current product candidates in their respective indications:

• OBE2109 for the treatment of pain associated with endometriosis and heavy menstrual bleeding
associated with uterine fibroids. We are currently conducting the EDELWEISS trial, which is a
multiple-dose, placebo-controlled Phase 2b clinical trial of OBE2109 in endometriosis patients in the
United States and Europe, with a target enrollment of 330 patients, from which we expect to report
initial data in the first half of 2018. Additionally, we intend to commence the PRIMROSE Phase 3
clinical trials in patients with heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids in the first half
of 2017. The PRIMROSE clinical trials will each have a target enrollment of approximately 500
patients and will be conducted in the United States and in Europe. We expect to report data from these
Phase 3 clinical trials in the first half of 2020.

• Nolasiban for the improvement of IVF outcomes in women undergoing assisted reproductive

technology, or ART. We are advancing nolasiban into Phase 3 clinical development to evaluate its
potential to improve clinical pregnancy and live birth rates for women undergoing IVF. We initiated
our initial IMPLANT2 Phase 3 clinical trial in Europe, where we believe more IVF treatments are
conducted than in the United States, in March 2017, and expect to report data for the primary endpoint
in the second quarter of 2018. If this trial is successful, we plan on conducting an end-of-Phase 2

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

meeting with the FDA and to reactivate our investigational new drug application, or IND, before
commencing any U.S. clinical trials.

• OBE022 for the treatment of preterm labor (GA 24-34 weeks). We intend to advance OBE022 into

Phase 2a Proof-of-Concept clinical trial in the second half of 2017 to assess the safety and efficacy of
OBE022 to delay birth in women 24 to 34 weeks pregnant who face preterm labor and potentially
preterm delivery. In February 2017, we completed a Phase 1 clinical trial assessing the safety,
tolerability and PK profile of OBE022 in healthy post-menopausal female volunteers after single doses
of 10 mg to 1,300 mg and multiple doses between 100 mg per day and 1,000 mg per day over 7
consecutive days. OBE022 was observed to have a favorable PK profile, no clinically significant food
effect, a favorable safety profile and to be well-tolerated at doses up to 1,300 mg after single dose
administration and up to 1,000 mg per day after multiple dose administration over 7 days.

• Develop a targeted commercialization strategy for any approved product candidates. We have obtained

worldwide commercial rights to our lead product candidates, except for certain countries in Asia with respect
to OBE2109. As we move our product candidates through development toward regulatory approval we will
evaluate several options for each product candidate’s commercialization strategy. These options include
building our own internal sales force, entering into a joint marketing partnership with another pharmaceutical
or biotechnology company, or out-licensing the product to another pharmaceutical or biotechnology company.

•

Pursue additional indications for our current product candidates. We believe each of our current product
candidates have application outside the indications we are currently developing. For example, we are
evaluating the relevance and the feasibility of developing OBE2109 for the treatment of symptoms associated
with adenomyosis, precocious puberty, polycystic ovary syndrome and prostate cancer; nolasiban for
improving clinical pregnancy and live birth rates following frozen thawed embryo transfer; and OBE022 for
treatment of late-stage preterm labor in weeks 34 to 37 of pregnancy. We plan to pursue additional indications
for our existing product candidates.

• Leverage our international product development experience and extensive network of clinical experts and
pharmaceutical industry executives within women’s reproductive health and pregnancy to in-license or
acquire novel product candidates. We are focused on identifying, and in-licensing or acquiring, additional
clinical-stage product candidates that we believe have the potential to become best-in-class or first-in-class
products for the treatment of serious conditions in women’s reproductive health and pregnancy, if approved.
We intend to focus on product candidates that we believe will be efficient from a capital-management
standpoint, and we are exploring additional needs in our therapeutic field, such as premenstrual syndrome,
fibrocystic breast disease, post-menopausal hot flashes, preeclampsia and dysmenorrhea.

OBE2109: Investigational GnRH Receptor Antagonist for Symptoms Associated with Endometriosis and Uterine
Fibroids

We are developing OBE2109 as an oral GnRH receptor antagonist for the treatment of pain associated with endometriosis
and heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids. We believe OBE2109, if approved, has the potential to be a
best-in-class oral GnRH receptor antagonist based on its favorable PK and PD profiles, and its potential to provide targeted
estradiol suppression to reduce pain symptoms associated with endometriosis and heavy menstrual bleeding associated with
uterine fibroids, while mitigating bone mineral density loss and other adverse effects that are typically associated with
excessive estradiol suppression. We believe that OBE2109 has the potential to offer personalized dosing that can be
tailored to a patient’s individual response and that it will be supported by key differentiating product characteristics,
including absence of food effect, high bioavailability, low volume of distribution, and low PK and PD variability. We
believe these characteristics are key product differentiators compared to other GnRH receptor antagonists in development.

In 2015, we in-licensed OBE2109 from Kissei. Kissei completed three Phase 2a clinical trials in Japan of OBE2109 in
patients with endometriosis, including one double blind placebo-controlled trial with a subgroup of patients diagnosed with
both endometriosis and uterine fibroids.

Aimed at addressing the need of the largest possible population in each indication, our clinical trials for both of these
indications are designed to assess and potentially support the registration of two regimens of administrations for OBE2109
i.e. (i) a moderate dose of OBE2109 without add-back therapy and (ii) a high dose of OBE2109 with add-back therapy. We
are currently conducting the 330-patient multiple-dose, placebo-controlled Phase 2b EDELWEISS clinical trial of

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

OBE2109 in endometriosis patients across 46 sites in the United States and 15 sites in Central and Eastern Europe. We
expect to report data from the first 24-week evaluation period of this trial in the first half of 2018. We intend to commence
our two Phase 3 PRIMROSE clinical trials in patients with heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids in the
first half of 2017. The PRIMROSE clinical trials will each have a target enrollment of approximately 500 patients and will
be conducted in the United States and in Europe. We expect to report data from these Phase 3 clinical trials in the first half
of 2020.

Background of Endometriosis and Uterine Fibroids

Endometriosis is a painful disorder in which the endometrium grows outside of the uterus, typically on the lining of the
pelvis, on the ovaries, in the rectovaginal septum, on the bladder, and in the bowels. Endometriosis causes monthly
bleeding and chronic inflammatory reactions in the abdomen that may result in ovarian cyst formation, scar tissue and
adhesions. The symptoms of endometriosis include significant pain during menstrual periods, chronic pelvic pain, pain
during intercourse, excessive menstrual bleeding and infertility which in turn can impact general physical, mental and
social well-being. Often the pain associated with endometriosis is cyclical in nature and reflects the response to
reproductive hormones circulating throughout the body, particularly estrogen. Endometriosis is also one of the leading
causes of infertility. In many instances, endometriosis is only diagnosed when women seek treatment for such infertility.

According to the World Endometriosis Research Foundation, as of 2014, endometriosis affects an estimated one in ten
women during their reproductive years, totaling approximately 176 million women globally between the ages of 15 and 49.
As of 2014, we believe that approximately 2.5 million women in the United States were diagnosed and treated for
endometriosis, and the majority of those women experience significant pain during menstrual periods.

Uterine fibroids are common non-cancerous tumors that develop in the muscular wall of the uterus. Uterine fibroids can
vary in size from a few millimeters to more than 20 centimeters, and in number from a single fibroid to several dozen
fibroids. The main symptoms of uterine fibroids are heavy menstrual bleeding, anemia, abdominal pressure, abdominal
pain, bloating, increased urinary frequency and reproductive dysfunction. Heavy menstrual blood loss is the most frequent
disabling symptom of uterine fibroids. Uterine fibroids also carry an increased risk of pregnancy complications such as
infertility, miscarriage, placental abruption and premature onset of labor.

According to a study published in the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology in 2003, uterine fibroids affect an
estimated 20 to 40% of women over the age of 30 in the United States based on clinical cases and women who undergo
treatment. We believe that more than four million women in the United States are diagnosed and being treated for uterine
fibroids.

The Role of GnRH

The exact causes of endometriosis and uterine fibroids are not currently understood. However, several factors can
contribute to their development and progression, including the rise and fall of hormones, particularly estrogen, mainly in
the form of estradiol. The production of estrogen in the body is regulated by GnRH. GnRH is responsible for stimulating
the synthesis and release of luteinizing hormone, or LH, and follicle stimulating hormone, or FSH, by the pituitary gland.
LH and FSH in turn drive estrogen production through stimulation of the ovaries. Estradiol is the hormone that, among
other effects, causes the endometrium inside the uterus to thicken during the menstrual cycle. Similarly, estradiol has been
determined to promote the growth of endometriosis lesions and uterine fibroids. Various pharmacological treatments
directed at addressing endometriosis and uterine fibroids attempt to regulate the production of estrogen, particularly
estradiol, by controlling the activity of GnRH.

Limitations of Current Therapies for Endometriosis and Uterine Fibroids
Current treatment options for endometriosis and uterine fibroids are either pharmacological or surgical.

Endometriosis

For endometriosis, the treatment selected is based on the severity of pain and the extent of the disease. Endometriosis
treatments aim first to alleviate pain, then to remove or decrease the size and number of endometrial lesions, and possibly
improve fertility. Oral contraceptives, progestins and NSAIDs are generally first-line treatments for women experiencing

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

pain. Following the failure of first-line therapies, current treatment options are limited to intra-muscular or subcutaneous
GnRH agonist injections, GnRH agonists nasal spray pumps or surgery for the most symptomatic cases.

Surgery can provide short-term relief by excising the endometrial lesions, but often does not prevent the endometrial
lesions from recurring. Surgery requires general anesthesia, and has a risk of scar tissue and adhesion formation in the
pelvis, which could lead to infertility, make pain worse, require additional surgeries or damage other pelvic structures.
Surgical treatments for endometriosis range from laparoscopy to more complex open abdominal surgery. If a woman has
not responded to other medical or surgical treatments, a radical hysterectomy, which is the removal of all or part of the
uterus and the ovaries may be required, resulting in definitive infertility and immediate menopause.

The World Endometriosis Research Foundation through its EndoCost study estimated the aggregate annual cost of
endometriosis to be approximately $80 billion in the United States and approximately $60 billion in Germany, the UK,
France and Italy in 2012 based on current exchange rates.

Uterine Fibroids

For heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids, current treatment options are limited and generally consist of
oral contraceptives, GnRH agonist injections or surgery. Oral contraceptives are generally used as the first-line therapy.
Upon failure of a first-line therapy or contraindication to oral contraceptives, surgical intervention is generally the next
treatment option. Hysterectomy is the most commonly performed surgical treatment option. Other less invasive procedures
include (1) myomectomy, which is a selective removal of the fibroid typically performed by laparoscopy, which usually
preserves fertility, (2) uterine artery embolization, which is a procedure to obstruct the arteries nurturing the fibroid,
performed by arterial catheterization, and (3) if the dominant symptom is bleeding, endometrial ablation, which is a
procedure to remove the inner layer of the uterus performed by thermic or ultrasonic process. According to a study
published in the American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology in 2012, approximately 200,000 hysterectomies and 30,000
myomectomies are performed annually for the treatment of uterine fibroids in the United States as of 2003. Hysterectomies
are major surgeries and, according to the National Uterine Fibroids Foundation, approximately 660 women die each year in
the United States from complications from a hysterectomy. Hysterectomies can be both physically and psychologically
damaging, not only resulting in a woman becoming infertile, but they also can be perceived by some women as impairing
their feminine integrity. Surgery also carries a risk of scar tissue and adhesions, which could lead to infertility, make pain
worse, require additional surgeries or damage other pelvic structures.

Treating uterine fibroids is expensive, as surgery constitutes a significant cost burden. Patients who do not undergo surgery
often require medical management, hospitalization and additional outpatient physician visits, which further increase the
annual costs of the disease. According to a systematic review of literature published in the American Journal of
Obstetrics &Gynecology in 2012, direct and indirect costs associated with uterine fibroids were estimated in 2010 to be up
to $34.4 billion annually in the United States.

Mechanism of Action and Limitations of GnRH Agonists

GnRH agonists are a standard pharmaceutical therapy for estrogen dependent conditions such as endometriosis and uterine
fibroids. However, GnRH agonists have significant drawbacks and limitations.

GnRH agonists act by overstimulating the GnRH receptors, which desensitizes pituitary cells, resulting in reduced secretion
of LH and FSH, and severely reduced production of estrogen, a contributing factor to endometriosis and uterine fibroids.
This leads to a state referred to as pseudo-menopause, in which patients experience menopausal symptoms before
ultimately experiencing symptom relief. While GnRH agonists may be effective at treating the symptoms of endometriosis
and uterine fibroids, they can be accompanied with serious drawbacks and limitations including:

• Excessive suppression of estradiol and related unfavorable side effect profile. Because GnRH agonists cannot

be titrated, they act by excessively suppressing estradiol to a post-menopausal level of less than 20
picogram/milliliter, or pg/ml. Excessive suppression of estrogen can result in multiple side effects before the
patient experiences any relief, including hot flashes and bone mineral density loss. Clinical trials of an
approved GnRH agonist demonstrated that patients lose an average of up to 6% of their bone mineral density
after 12 months of GnRH agonist treatment.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

• Delayed therapeutic effect and initial worsening of symptoms. Since GnRH agonists act by overstimulating
the GnRH receptors, they can cause an initial worsening of symptoms that can last for several weeks.

• Administration by injection. Many GnRH agonists such as Lupron (leuprolide acetate) must be injected, which

generally requires the assistance of a doctor or nurse.

• Required add-back therapy. To counteract the side effects of the excessive suppression of estrogen, additional
administration of estrogen, referred to as “add-back therapy,” may be recommended after three months of
treatment and is required after six months of treatment. Add-back therapy may result in additional
contraindications and adverse effects.

• Variable and unpredictable reversibility of treatment. After stopping treatment with injectable GnRH

agonists, a patient’s ovarian function can take weeks or months to return to normal. This is particularly relevant
and problematic if a patient wishes to conceive after treatment or if treatment is interrupted for lack of
tolerance.

OBE2109’s Mechanism of Action and Solution to GnRH Agonist Drawbacks and Limitations

OBE2109 has been designed to be a GnRH receptor antagonist with oral administration and low PK and PD variability.
OBE2109 binds to and blocks the GnRH receptor in the pituitary gland, which clinical trials suggest, results in a dose-
dependent reduction of LH and FSH production. This reduction in LH and FSH production in turn leads to a reduction of
estrogen levels.

At selected doses, OBE2109 has been observed to maintain estradiol levels in the target range of 20 to 60 pg/ml, which we
believe is the optimal range to relieve symptoms associated with endometriosis and uterine fibroids while mitigating bone
mineral density loss or other adverse effects that can be associated with excessive estradiol suppression.

We believe OBE2109 has the potential to overcome certain drawbacks and limitations of GnRH agonists. The potential
advantages of OBE2109 compared to GnRH agonists include:

• Fast onset of therapeutic effect. By blocking, as opposed to stimulating, the GnRH receptor, OBE2109 has the

potential to suppress LH and FSH within hours, lowering estradiol levels and reducing pain within days while
potentially mitigating the initial worsening of symptoms which is often associated with GnRH agonist
treatments.

• Ease of administration. OBE2109 has the potential to be administered orally once daily due to its observed
half-life of approximately 15 hours. This potential dosing regime is a more convenient treatment option than
GnRH agonist intramuscular or subcutaneous injections.

• Optionality for endometriosis and uterine fibroids treatment: stand alone or in combination with add-back
therapy. In contrast to GnRH agonists, for which add-back therapy may be recommended when treatment
exceeds three months and is required when treatment exceeds six months, we believe that at the 50 to 200 mg
doses being tested in our Phase 2b trial, OBE2109 has the potential to be utilized as a stand-alone treatment for
a majority of patients with pain associated with endometriosis by maintaining estradiol levels between 20 and
60 pg/ml, without the need for add-back therapy to counteract the side effects associated with severe
suppression of estradiol. For the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids, we
believe that based on our proposed dosing (100-200 mg) some patients may not require add-back therapy,
while others may require add-back therapy, depending on the treatment dosage. Others patients may require
add-back therapy, depending on the treatment dosage required to control symptoms.

• Quick reversibility of effect. As a result of OBE2109’s observed half-life of approximately 15 hours, we

believe OBE2109 has the potential for ovarian function to resume within days following the end of treatment.
In contrast, a patient’s ovarian function can take weeks or months to return to normal after stopping treatment
with injectable GnRH agonists.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

OBE2109’s Potential Advantages to Other GnRH Receptor Antagonists in Development

There are currently no GnRH receptor antagonists approved for the treatment of symptoms associated with endometriosis
or uterine fibroids. We are aware that AbbVie Inc., Myovant Sciences, Inc. and Astellas Pharma Inc. are developing GnRH
receptor antagonists for the treatment of symptoms associated with endometriosis or uterine fibroids.

Based on publicly available information and data for these other product candidates in development, we believe the
potential advantages of OBE2109 compared to other GnRH receptor antagonists being developed include:

• Favorable and consistent PK profile. OBE2109 has been observed to have a consistent PK profile and low
variability, due to high bioavailability and low volume of distribution. We believe some of the competitive
product candidates have low bioavailability and high volume of distribution due to drug accumulation in fat,
which we believe may translate into variable efficacy and safety. In addition, OBE2109’s half-life allows for
once daily dosing for across indications, while one of the competitive product candidates is being developed
for twice daily dosing.

•

Personalized dosing. Based on OBE2109’s consistent PK and PD profile observed in preclinical studies and
clinical trials, we are currently evaluating personalized dosing that can be tailored to a patient’s individual
response. We believe this may allow us to pursue a label for varied dosing based on a patient’s estradiol levels
and symptoms. We believe other products in clinical development are currently only being evaluated for one or
two dosing options, which do not appear to account for patient characteristics, individual response or patient
preference.

• No systematic need for add-back therapy. For symptoms associated with both endometriosis and uterine

fibroids, we are developing OBE2109 as a stand-alone treatment (without need for add-back therapy) and in
association with add-back therapy (e.g. fixed-dose combination therapy) to fulfill the needs of a broad patient
population with endometriosis or uterine fibroids. We believe at least one other product in clinical development
is only being evaluated as a fixed-dose combination therapy that includes add-back therapy, which we believe
may not be suitable for treatment of women with poor tolerance or contraindications to add-back therapy. We
also believe that at least one of the other products in clinical development has demonstrated, at the dose being
developed in the clinical trials, a bone mineral density loss at 24 weeks of treatment comparable to Lupron, a
GnRH agonist used for the treatment of endometriosis and uterine fibroids.

• Compliance benefit. OBE2109 may have an advantage in patient compliance due to the lack of observed food

effect and the ability to be taken once anytime throughout the day, as compared to certain of the competitive
product candidates, which we believe need to be taken on an empty stomach.

OBE2109 Preclinical and Clinical Development for Pain Associated with Endometriosis

Prior to in-licensing OBE2109, Kissei completed a preclinical program, a Phase 1 clinical trial in healthy female volunteers
of Japanese and European descent and three Phase 2a clinical trials in patients of Japanese descent with endometriosis,
including one trial that included a subgroup of patients with both endometriosis and uterine fibroids. In these trials,
OBE2109 was observed to have a linear PK profile, a predictable dose-dependent suppression of estradiol and a dose range
that was well-tolerated and provided symptom relief. Following our in-license of OBE2109 from Kissei, we submitted an
IND for OBE2109 in May 2016, which was accepted by the FDA. We are currently conducting the multiple-dose, placebo-
controlled Phase 2b EDELWEISS clinical trial of OBE2109 in 330 endometriosis patients in the United States and Europe.
We expect to report initial data for this trial in the first half of 2018.

Preclinical Studies and Phase 1 Clinical Trial

In preclinical studies, OBE2109 was observed to be a highly potent and selective antagonist of the GnRH receptor. The
preclinical toxicology and safety pharmacology studies did not raise tolerance or safety concerns or potential for DDIs. In
the Phase 1 clinical trial, OBE2109 was observed to have a favorable safety profile and to be well-tolerated up to 400 mg
once daily for seven days. Additionally, OBE2109 had a linear PK profile, a half-life of approximately 15 hours and no
significant differences between women of Japanese and European descent. Moreover, OBE2109 was observed to have a
low volume of distribution, meaning the drug remained in the blood and did not accumulate in fatty tissue, and a dose-
proportional response shown in the Figure 1 below. Furthermore, in the Phase 1 clinical trial, there was no food effect
observed. OBE2109 was observed to induce a dose-dependent decrease in LH and FSH over time, which we believe
correlates with the ability of OBE2109 to control estradiol levels in a dose-dependent manner. Based on the low PK

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

variability and lack of dose overlap observed in the Phase 1 clinical trial, we believe we will be able to more tightly control
biological response with personalized doses of OBE2109. In addition, in 2016 we completed a Phase 1 trial to assess the
impact of OBE2109 on the potential induction of a liver enzyme known as cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4), which is
believed to be responsible for the metabolism of add-back therapy. In this trial, we observed no relevant CYP3A4
induction, which we believe suggests that OBE2109 will not interfere with add-back therapy.

Figure 1: Mean OBE2109 Concentration Over Time

Figure 2: LH Reduction from Baseline Over Time

Completed Phase 2a Clinical Trials

Kissei completed three Phase 2a clinical trials of OBE2109 in patients of Japanese descent with endometriosis in 2013 and
2014. Endometriosis was either diagnosed by laparoscopy or by confirmation using ultrasound of ovarian chocolate cysts,
which are a particular type of ovarian cyst associated with endometriosis. Outcomes included changes in pelvic menstrual,
non-menstrual and overall pain scores, analgesic use and hormone levels. The designs of these trials are summarized in the
table below.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

Patients reported daily whether they were bleeding, and the level of their pelvic pain using a verbal rating scale from 0 to 4,
with 0 representing no pain and 4 representing unbearable pain even after using a pain relieving drug.

Improvement rate of pelvic pain severity was assessed using the proportion of pain free days during the evaluation period.
Pain free is defined as the absence of pain or slight pain during menstruation and the absence of pain during non-
menstruation. Across all three studies, OBE2109 was observed to rapidly and consistently reduce pelvic pain scores. All
doses were observed to have statistically significant reductions of both menstrual and non-menstrual pelvic pain compared
to placebo.

In the KLH1201 trial, the average severity of pelvic pain during menstruation in the 50 mg and 200 mg treatment groups
was 1.74 +/- 0.62 (mean +/- standard deviation), and 1.42 +/- 0.61, respectively, at baseline, as compared to 0.94 +/- 0.98
and 0.00 +/- 0.00, respectively, at week 8. The average severity of pelvic pain during non-menstruation in the 50 mg and
200 mg treatment groups was 0.25 +/- 0.26 and 0.23 +/- 0.30, respectively, at baseline, as compared to 0.06 +/- 0.12 and
0.12 +/- 0.29, respectively, at week 8. As the trial was not placebo-controlled, no statistical testing was conducted.

In the KLH1203 trial, the average reduction from baseline to week 8 in severity of pelvic pain during menstruation in the
75 mg and 150 mg treatment groups was 1.39 +/- 0.79 and 2.05 +/- 0.90, respectively. The average reduction from baseline
to week 8 in average severity of pelvic pain during non-menstruation in these groups was 0.46 +/- 0.68 and 0.64 +/- 0.70,
respectively. As the trial was not placebo-controlled, no statistical testing was conducted.

In the placebo-controlled KLH1202 trial, there was a statistically significant reduction in pain for each of the 50 mg, 100
mg and 200 mg treatment groups, as compared to placebo at weeks 4, 8 and 12. For menstrual pain, a p-value of less than
0.001 was considered to be statistically significant for all doses. For non-menstrual pain, a p-value equal to 0.003, 0.010
and 0.005 for the 50 mg, 100 mg and 200 mg doses, respectively, was considered to be statistically significant. Patients also
reported that their pelvic pain reduction was maintained four weeks after treatment. The decrease in average severity of
pelvic pain (regardless of presence or absence of menstrual bleeding) and the associated p-value is shown in Figure 3
below.

Figure 3: Average Change in Severity of Pelvic Pain Over Time (Menstrual and Non-menstrual Pain Combined)

In addition, patients reported significant dose-dependent reductions in analgesic use (p<0.001 for all comparisons) and
bleeding days. Estradiol levels were increasingly suppressed in a dose-dependent manner consistently across all three Phase

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

2a trials, which we believe resulted in the reduction of pelvic pain, analgesic use and bleeding days. Doses of 50 mg and 75
mg were observed to result in median serum estradiol levels in the target range of 20 to 60 pg/ml. Doses of 100 mg, 150 mg
and 200 mg were observed to reduce median estradiol serum levels below 20 pg/ml.

Figure 4: Median Estradiol Levels Over Time

In addition, as shown in Figure 5 below, approximately 40% of the patients receiving 50 mg and 100 mg doses of
OBE2109 were observed to have estradiol levels between 20 to 60 pg/ml at week 12.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Figure 5: Percent of Patients at Various Estradiol Levels in KLH1202 Trial at Week 12

Business Update

Safety Results of Phase 1 and Phase 2a Clinical Trials

The safety and tolerability of OBE2109 was evaluated in a total of 128 patients with endometriosis and 77 healthy female
volunteers across the four clinical trials, with doses up to 400 mg for seven days and up to 200 mg for 12 weeks.

In the Phase 1 clinical trial, adverse events were reported with similar frequency in all groups, including the placebo group.
No serious adverse events were reported.

In the three Phase 2a clinical trials, almost all of the adverse events were mild across all treatment groups. The most
common adverse events were abnormal bleeding from the uterus, contracting a cold, headaches and hot flashes. Most hot
flashes were mild, three were moderate in severity and none were severe. No serious adverse events were reported in the
KLH1203 trial. A single serious adverse event was observed in each of the KLH1201 and KLH1202 trials and both were
determined by the principal investigators to be unrelated to OBE2109.

Clinical Development Plan—Phase 2b EDELWEISS Clinical Trial in Pain Associated with Endometriosis

We are currently conducting the Phase 2b EDELWEISS clinical trial in patients with endometriosis. We expect to enroll
approximately 330 patients across 46 sites in the United States and 15 sites in Central and Eastern Europe. In this double-
blind, placebo-controlled trial, we are evaluating four doses of OBE2109: 50 mg, 75 mg, 100 mg and 200 mg, each with no
add-back therapy. Patients will report their pain on a daily basis with an electronic diary and we will analyze data at 12
weeks and 24 weeks after initial treatment. After the initial 12-week evaluation period, we plan on exploring a dose
titration regimen in an additional trial arm, in which some patients initially dosed with 75 mg will receive an increased dose
of 100 mg, a decreased dose of 50 mg or the same dose of 75 mg for the second 12-week evaluation period, depending on
their respective estradiol levels at 4 and 8 weeks after initial treatment. In addition, after the first 12 weeks, patients
receiving placebo will switch to a 100 mg daily dose.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

Figure 6 below depicts the trial design of the EDELWEISS trial:

Figure 6: Design of Phase 2b EDELWEISS Clinical Trial

We believe our current data in endometriosis patients of Japanese descent supports a daily dose of 50 mg or 75 mg of
OBE2109. We believe this daily dose will suppress estradiol within the target range and not result in bone mineral density
loss that requires add-back therapy. We expect slightly higher doses will be required to achieve estradiol suppression within
the target range in patients of American and European descent given a higher average body weight. We plan to confirm this
following the review of the results from the Phase 2b EDELWEISS clinical trial.

Menstrual and non-menstrual pelvic pain will be assessed with a 4-point Verbal Rating Scale, or VRS, and an 11-point
Numeric Rating Scale, or NRS. The primary endpoint of this trial will be the reduction from baseline at week 12 in the
mean overall pelvic VRS pain score. The key secondary endpoint is the bone mineral density after 24 weeks of treatment
assessed with a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scan.

After 24 weeks of treatment, patients may choose to continue in an extension trial. In the extension trial, patients will
continue treatment for another 28 weeks at the same dose, with the exception of patients receiving a 200 mg dose, who will
be switched to a 100 mg daily dose. After treatment, all patients will be followed for an additional, 24-week period that will
be treatment free.

We expect to receive the primary efficacy results for the 24-week evaluation period in the first half of 2018, which will
allow us to assess the efficacy of OBE2109 in patients with endometriosis. We expect to receive the final results for the 28-
week extension by the fourth quarter of 2018 and the 24-week follow-up period in the first half of 2019. Upon completion
of the initial 24-week period and assuming the results of the trial are favorable, we will request an end-of-Phase 2 meeting
with the FDA to determine the design of our Phase 3 program for pain associated with endometriosis.

OBE2109 Clinical Development for Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Associated with Uterine Fibroids

We are developing OBE2109 for reduction of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids in adult women of
reproductive age. We believe OBE2109 has the potential to provide an alternative to surgery, which is the most common
treatment for uterine fibroids. One of the three Phase 2a clinical trials in patients of Japanese descent with endometriosis,
KLH1202, included a subgroup of 57 patients with both endometriosis and uterine fibroids.

Completed Phase 2a Clinical Trial

In the KLH1202 clinical trial, 57 patients presented with uterine fibroids in addition to endometriosis. For these patients,
both menstrual bleeding and uterine volume were evaluated.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

Efficacy Results

As shown in Figure 7 below, we observed a dose-dependent reduction in the percentage of days in which bleeding occurred
during the 12-week treatment period in patients treated with OBE2109.

Figure 7: Percentage of Days with Bleeding During 12-Week Treatment Period

Further, in these patients with uterine fibroids, the 50 mg dose of OBE2109 suppressed bleeding in approximately 55% of
patients, whereas the 200 mg daily dose of OBE2109 suppressed bleeding in approximately 95% of patients as shown in
Figure 8 below. In addition, most patients stopped bleeding within a few weeks of treatment initiation in the 100 mg and
200 mg group, as shown in Figure 8 below.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Figure 8: Time to No Bleeding for Uterine Fibroids Patients in KLH1202 Trial

Business Update

These patients experienced a dose-dependent reduction in uterine volume, while no meaningful reduction in uterine volume
was observed in the placebo group, as shown in Figure 9 below. Reducing uterine volume is important for the treatment of
uterine fibroid patients, as patients with lower uterine volume are eligible for less invasive surgical procedures, such as a
hysterectomy by vaginal route rather than abdominal route. In addition, uterine volume is correlated with several symptoms
of uterine fibroids, such as urinary incontinence and frequency.

Figure 9: Change in Uterine Volume over Time

Safety Results

The safety results on the subgroup of patients with uterine fibroids did not differ from the safety in endometriosis patients.
The adverse events were generally mild across all treatment groups. The most common adverse events were those

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

associated with suppression of estradiol, including abnormal bleeding from the uterus during the first weeks of treatment
and hot flashes. Abnormal bleeding from the uterus was not more frequent in uterine fibroid patients than in endometriosis
only patients.

Clinical Development Plan—Heavy Menstrual Bleeding Associated with Uterine Fibroids

Based on feedback we received from the FDA in November 2016, we intend to commence the two PRIMROSE Phase 3
clinical trials in patients with heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids in the first half of 2017. The
PRIMROSE clinical trials will each have a target enrollment of approximately 500 patients. One of the trials will be
conducted in the United States and the other trial will be conducted in the United States and in Europe. We expect to report
data from these PRIMROSE Phase 3 clinical trials in the first half of 2020. We are currently conducting a Phase 1 PK and
PD clinical trial to assess two different doses of add-back therapy in patients receiving 100 mg and 200 mg doses of
OBE2109 over six weeks. We expect that the results of this clinical trial, which we expect to receive in the first half of
2017, will confirm the selection of the add-back therapy dose or doses planned in the PRIMROSE clinical trials. We
believe that a 100 mg dose of OBE2109 could control symptoms in a significant proportion of patients without requiring
add-back therapy. We also intend to further assess the efficacy of a 200 mg dose of OBE2109 both with and without add-
back therapy. We believe that the 200 mg dose will require add-back therapy to prevent excessive bone mineral density
loss. In addition, in 2016 we completed a Phase 1 trial to assess the impact of OBE2109 on the potential induction of a liver
enzyme known as cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4), which is believed to be responsible for the metabolism of add-back
back therapy. In this trial, we observed no relevant CYP3A4 induction, which we believe suggests that OBE2109 will not
interfere with add-back therapy.

Figure 10 below depicts the trial design of the Phase 3 PRIMROSE clinical trials:

Figure 10: Design of Phase 3 PRIMROSE Clinical Trials

Throughout the PRIMROSE clinical trials, patients will collect and deliver their used sanitary protection to us to be
analyzed. In addition, patients will report their bleeding status on a daily basis with an electronic diary.

The PRIMROSE clinical trials will have a 52-week evaluation period. The primary endpoint of these clinical trials will be
the reduction from baseline at week 24 of menstrual blood loss, defined as menstrual blood loss of less than 80 mL and
equal to or greater than a 50% reduction from baseline, assessed with the alkaline hematin method. A key secondary
endpoint will be the bone mineral density after 24 weeks of treatment assessed with a dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

scan. After the 52-week evaluation period, all patients will be followed for an additional, 24-week period that will be
treatment free. We expect to report data from the PRIMROSE Phase 3 clinical trials in the first half of 2020, and, if the
results are favorable, we intend to submit an NDA in the second half of 2020.

Nolasiban in IVF

We are developing nolasiban as an oral oxytocin receptor antagonist, to improve clinical pregnancy and live birth rates in
women undergoing embryo transfer after IVF, including intracytoplasmic sperm injection, or ICSI. We have observed
nolasiban’s ability to improve uterine receptivity by decreasing uterine contractions, improving uterine blood flow and
enhancing the receptivity of the endometrium to embryo implantation. We in-licensed nolasiban from Merck Serono, which
previously completed preclinical studies and Phase 1 clinical trials in 103 healthy female volunteers that evaluated the
safety and PK profile of nolasiban. We completed a 247-patient Phase 2 clinical trial of nolasiban in women undergoing
IVF, which we refer to as the IMPLANT trial. In the IMPLANT trial, nolasiban did not reach the primary endpoint of
demonstrating a statistically significant increase in pregnancy rate at six weeks after ET. In our post-hoc analysis, which
excluded patients with progesterone levels in the top quartile of the patient pool, we identified a statistically significant
dose-proportional increase in pregnancy rate at 10 weeks and live birth rate. We believe that high progesterone levels can
lead to a premature closing of the embryo implantation window. Based on these results, we believe that nolasiban could
represent a compelling option for increasing IVF outcomes, which, based on current treatments, only has an overall live
birth rate of approximately 33% in the United States and 21% in Europe. We initiated our 760 patient, IMPLANT2
European Phase 3 clinical trial in women undergoing IVF in March 2017 and expect to report data for the primary endpoint
in the second quarter of 2018.

Background on Assisted Reproductive Technology (IVF/ICSI)

Infertility is a disease of the reproductive system that impairs the body’s ability to reproduce. From 2006 to 2010, the
inability to have a child affected approximately 6.7 million women in the United States, which represented approximately
11% of the reproductive-age population. An increasing number of women in developed countries are delaying having
children until their mid-thirties, which has resulted in decreased fertility rates and increased demand for reproductive
therapies.

ART is used primarily for infertility treatments. According to the Centers for Disease Control and the European Society of
Human Reproduction and Embryology, IVF represents the vast majority of ART treatments or procedures. IVF helps
women achieve pregnancy by the collection of mature eggs in the ovaries, followed by fertilization and early embryo
development in the laboratory before transfer of the embryos into the womb. According to the European Society of Human
Reproduction and Embryology, every year about 1.6 million ART treatments are performed worldwide. In Europe, ART
treatments doubled from 2000 to 2010, and approximately 620,000 IVF treatments were performed in 2012. In the United
States, IVF treatments increased by 41.7% from 2010 to 2014, with approximately 210,000 treatments performed in 2014.
In Japan, approximately 325,000 IVF treatments were performed in 2012.

The first step in IVF is stimulation of egg production. Approximately ten days later, the eggs are harvested from the
ovaries, otherwise known as ovum pick-up, or OPU, and co-incubated with sperm cells, with this day being referred to as
Day 0. The resulting embryos are either used for fresh transfer to the uterus over the next three to five days or frozen for

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

future use. In Europe, approximately 50% of all embryo transfers occur three days after Day 0 and an additional 25% occur
five days after Day 0, with the remaining 25% frozen for future transfer. The figure below depicts the IVF procedure:

The cost of one IVF cycle varies between $8,000 to $15,000 in the United States, EUR 2,000 to EUR 10,000 in Europe and
$3,000 to $6,000 in Japan. As of 2006, fertility drugs account for more than $2,000 of the cost of a treatment cycle. Most
patients require multiple fertility treatment cycles. IMS Health Incorporated estimates that global sales of fertility drugs
exceeded $2 billion in 2014.

The IVF process has an overall live birth rate of approximately 33% in the United States and 21% in Europe. The success
of IVF depends on the quality of the embryo, the transfer procedure and ultimately the receptivity of the uterus. In order for
the embryo transfer to be successful, it is important for the uterus to be receptive to embryo implantation, which includes a
proper hormonal environment, appropriate blood flow within the uterus, and minimal uterine contractions at the time of
embryo transfer. The endometrium is the inner layer of the uterus that is in direct contact with the implanting embryo.
Uterine contractions occur throughout the course of a woman’s menstrual cycle and the frequency and intensity of the
contractions depend on the phase of the cycle. In a study published in Human Reproduction in 1998, after IVF, the rate of
uterine contractions assessed at the time of embryo transfer was observed to be negatively correlated with pregnancy rates
as shown in the figure below.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

Role of Oxytocin in Embryo Implantation

Oxytocin is a hormone that is secreted by the pituitary gland. Oxytocin receptors are present on the uterus smooth muscle
cells, the endometrium and the uterus arteries. The release of oxytocin by the pituitary gland activates oxytocin receptors,
which results in uterine contractions. As shown in the graphic below, blocking the activation of the uterine oxytocin
receptors at the time of embryo transfer may enhance uterine receptivity by decreasing uterine contractions, improving
uterine blood flow and enhancing the receptivity of the endometrium to embryo implantation, which can lead to increased
clinical pregnancy and live birth rates.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

A systematic review and meta-analysis of investigator-sponsored trials conducted in 2014 and published in Fertility &
Sterility concluded that pregnancy rates doubled with the infusion of an oxytocin receptor antagonist at the time of embryo
transfer. As part of this analysis, it was observed that improvement in pregnancy rates was not restricted to women with a
high rate of uterine contractions. According to this analysis, additional mechanisms, such as endometrium receptivity and
uterine blood flow, may also contribute to improving pregnancy rates. In a recent trial published in 2016 involving patients
with endometriosis undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer, clinical pregnancy rates were approximately 20% higher
after treatment with an oxytocin receptor antagonist, representing a 51% increase relative to the placebo. In addition,
according to studies published in Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics in 2011, women who received an oxytocin
receptor antagonist after embryo transfer, were observed, based on three dimensional power doppler ultrasound, to have
improved characteristics for uterine receptivity, including enhanced endometrial blood flow.

Limitations of Current Treatment Options
Currently, there are no oxytocin receptor antagonists approved for use in connection with IVF.

Potential Therapeutic Benefits of nolasiban

We are developing nolasiban, an oxytocin receptor antagonist, for use in connection with IVF. We believe nolasiban has
the potential to offer the following therapeutic benefits:

•

Increased live birth rate. Though nolasiban did not reach the primary endpoint of a statistically significant
increase in pregnancy rate at six weeks after ET, we conducted a post-hoc analysis of the IMPLANT clinical
trial, which excluded patients with progesterone levels in the top quartile of the patient pool. In this post-hoc
analysis, we identified a dose-proportional increase in ongoing pregnancy rate at week 10 and live birth rate
from 30.6% for placebo to 51.0% for 900 mg nolasiban, representing a 67% increase relative to placebo.

• Convenience of administration. We are designing nolasiban to be an oral oxytocin receptor antagonist, which

could be easily incorporated into IVF procedures.

• Fast and sustained therapeutic effect. In clinical trials, nolasiban was observed to be rapidly absorbed in the
body and, in the case of the 900 mg dose, to maintain effective concentrations in the body for three days after
treatment, potentially allowing for a single administration at the time of embryo transfer.

• Favorable safety profile. In Phase 1 and Phase 2 clinical trials, single doses of nolasiban were well tolerated by
patients. In addition, extensive testing in animal models around the time of embryo implantation and during
pregnancy has not revealed any concerns regarding embryo toxicity.

Nolasiban Preclinical and Clinical Development

Nolasiban was discovered and initially developed by Merck Serono. Following our in-license of nolasiban from Merck
Serono in 2013, we submitted an IND for nolasiban, which became effective in January 2015. Under that IND, we
completed a Phase 2 clinical trial of nolasiban in 2016. Though nolasiban did not reach the primary endpoint of a
statistically significant increase in pregnancy rate six weeks after the ET based on our post-hoc analysis of the Phase 2 data
excluding patients with progesterone levels in the top quartile of the patient pool, we identified a statistically significant
dose-proportional increase in ongoing pregnancy rate at week 10 and live birth rate, with both having an absolute increase
of up to 20%, equivalent to a 67% relative increase to the placebo. In March 2017, we initiated a European Phase 3 clinical
trial in women undergoing IVF to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of nolasiban. Our IND for nolasiban is currently
inactive following the Phase 2 clinical trial, but we intend to reactivate the IND after discussions with the FDA if the
planned European Phase 3 clinical trial is successful.

Preclinical Studies and Phase 1 Clinical Trials

In preclinical studies, the ability of nolasiban to inhibit uterine contraction was observed, and there were no tolerance or
safety concerns. Specifically, studies were conducted focusing on the reproductive toxicology in rats and rabbits during the
time of implantation, and such studies did not reveal concerns of embryo toxicity after repeated exposure to nolasiban.

In single and multiple ascending dose Phase 1 clinical trials conducted in the United Kingdom by Merck Serono, nolasiban
was tested in 103 healthy female volunteers with single doses up to 1,500 mg and multiple doses up to 900 mg for seven

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

days. There were no safety signals, trends in adverse events or negative findings from vital signs or laboratory parameters.
Nolasiban was observed to be quickly absorbed, reaching maximum concentration in approximately two hours, and to have
a dose-proportional PK profile and a half-life that could support once daily dosing. There was no observed food effect.

Phase 2 Clinical Trial

In 2016, we completed a Phase 2, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose ranging, clinical trial of nolasiban in women
undergoing IVF, which we refer to as the IMPLANT trial. This trial enrolled 247 women across 26 fertility clinics in five
European countries. Patients were between the ages of 18 and 36, were currently undergoing medically indicated IVF and
had no more than one previous IVF cycle failure. The study evaluated three doses of nolasiban, 100 mg, 300 mg or 900 mg,
compared to placebo. Patients received a single oral dose approximately four hours before a Day 3 fresh embryo transfer.
The patients were evaluated once pregnant at weeks 2, 6 and 10 and we also evaluated the infants born for up to six months
after birth. Assuming a 20% pregnancy rate in placebo and a 40% pregnancy rate in nolasiban at 900 mg, the number of
patients in each arm of the trial provided an 80% chance to show a statistically significant increase in pregnancy rate from
placebo through ascending doses of nolasiban using a trend test. We believed this was the appropriate trial design to
determine dose effect and guide future clinical development.

The trial design is summarized below:

The primary endpoint of this trial was:

•

the percentage of women with an intra-uterine pregnancy with positive embryo heartbeat at six weeks after the
ET day.

Secondary endpoints included:

•

the percentage of women with a positive blood pregnancy test at 14 days after the OPU day;

the percentage of women with an intra-uterine pregnancy with positive embryo heartbeat at 10 weeks after the
OPU day;

the embryo-implantation rate defined as the number of intra-uterine embryos with positive heartbeat at six
weeks after the ET day divided by the number of embryos transferred; and

the absolute and relative change from baseline, prior to nolasiban or placebo administration, to the time of
embryo transfer, which is about 3.5 hours after nolasiban/placebo administration and prior to embryo transfer,
in the rate of uterine contractions per minute.

Efficacy Results

As shown in Figure 11 below, which we refer to as the “Full Set Analysis,” the overall percentage of patients with an intra-
uterine pregnancy with a positive heartbeat at six weeks after ET and the live birth rate were increased by over 9%,
equivalent to a 26% increase relative to placebo. The median uterine contractions decreased by 8.7%, 4.0% and 13.3% for
the 100 mg, 300 mg and 900 mg groups, respectively, compared to placebo. However, statistical significance was not
reached for the primary endpoint, as indicated in the “Trend Test” column in Figure 11 below. We believe the lack of

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

statistical significance was attributable to the limited sample size and based on the 300 mg dose group of nolasiban which
had lower clinical pregnancy and live birth rates than the 100 mg and 900 mg treatment groups.

The trend test is a statistical technique that was used to determine whether there was a statistically significant linear
relationship between the dose of nolasiban administered and the amplitude of the increase in ongoing pregnancy rate at six
weeks after the ET day. In this Phase 2 IMPLANT trial, we considered a p-value of less than 0.10 to be statistically
significant.

Figure 11

Following our receipt of the initial data, we reviewed the patients’ characteristics within each of the dose groups. From this
review, we discovered that patients in the 300 mg group demonstrated higher estradiol levels and higher progesterone
levels prior to embryo transfer than in the other groups. We believe that high estradiol levels are responsible for the earlier
expression of progesterone receptors, which induce advancement of endometrial maturation, and that high progesterone
levels can lead to a premature closing of the embryo implantation window, preventing or impairing the embryo
implantation. Therefore, we subsequently conducted a post-hoc analysis of the results of the Phase 2 clinical trial, removing
patients with a progesterone level in the top quartile of the patient pool. There were 25 patients excluded in this post-hoc
analysis from the 300 mg group, while only 16, 12 and 11 patients were excluded in this post-hoc analysis from the
placebo, 100 mg and 900 mg groups, respectively, which we believe demonstrates the imbalance between the 300 mg
group and the other groups.

In our post-hoc analysis, we identified a statistically significant relationship between the dose of nolasiban and the ongoing
pregnancy rate at week 10 and live birth rate, with an increase from 30.6% for placebo to 51.0% for 900 mg nolasiban at

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

week 10 and for live birth rate, equivalent to a 67% increase relative to placebo (trend test p-value < 0.05). The results of
our post-hoc analysis are shown in Figure 12 below:

Figure 12

Based on these results, we believe that a single 900 mg dose of nolasiban administered just before embryo transfer has the
potential to increase clinical pregnancy and live birth rates following IVF.

Phase 2 Clinical Safety Results

In the IMPLANT trial, nolasiban was well tolerated at doses up to 900 mg. Adverse events were reported through 10 weeks
following the OPU day. Increased doses were not observed to result in increased occurrence of adverse events. The most
common adverse events were determined to be related to pregnancy, menstrual bleeding or the IVF procedure and occurred
at similar frequencies in the placebo and active treatment groups. Serious adverse events were reported in six patients and
included ectopic pregnancy in three patients, and adnexal torsion, vaginal hemorrhage and ovarian hyperstimulation
syndrome in one patient each. None of these serious adverse events were determined by the investigator to be related to the
treatment and none caused trial discontinuation. One patient in the nolasiban 900 mg group discontinued participation in
the trial due to a non-serious adverse event of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, which was determined by the
investigator to be unrelated to treatment. Only three adverse events, which occurred in patients in the 300 mg group, were
considered related to treatment (mild nausea, mild dizziness and mild rash), and the patients fully recovered from the
adverse events.

In the trial, ongoing pregnancies were followed up to 28 days post-delivery. As expected with human pregnancies, some
congenital malformations were observed both in the placebo group and the treatment groups. There appeared to be no
relationship between the nolasiban dose and the incidence of the congenital malformations, as shown in Figure 13 below,
and none were determined by the investigator to be related to treatment. In addition, nolasiban was not associated with an
increase in ectopic pregnancy or in intra-uterine growth retardation.

Figure 13

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

Clinical Development Plan

We have advanced nolasiban into Phase 3 clinical development to evaluate its potential to improve clinical pregnancy and
live birth rates for women undergoing IVF. We are conducting a Phase 3 clinical trial in Europe, which we refer to as
IMPLANT2, where we believe more IVF treatments are conducted. The IMPLANT2 European Phase 3 clinical trial is
designed to test the effect of a single oral dose of 900 mg of nolasiban administered four hours before embryo transfer,
compared to placebo. The primary endpoint is the ongoing pregnancy rate at ten weeks after the OPU day. Secondary
endpoints include clinical pregnancy rates at six weeks after the ET day, live birth rates, maternal, newborn baby and infant
follow-up. The design of this IMPLANT2 European Phase 3 clinical trial is shown in Figure 14 below.

Figure 14

We initiated this IMPLANT2 European Phase 3 clinical trial in March 2017, and expect to report data for the primary
endpoint in the second quarter of 2018. If this trial is successful, we plan on holding an end-of-Phase 2 meeting with the
FDA and to reactivate our IND before commencing any U.S. clinical trials.

OBE022: Our PGF2 Receptor Antagonist for the Treatment of Preterm Labor (GA 24-34 weeks)

We are developing OBE022 as a potential first-in-class, once daily, oral and selective PGF2, receptor antagonist for the
treatment of preterm labor in weeks 24 to 34 of pregnancy. PGF2 is a naturally occurring prostaglandin that acts to induce
labor in pregnant women. Through specific antagonism of the PGF2 receptor, OBE022 is designed to control preterm labor
by reducing inflammation, decreasing uterine contractions and preventing cervical changes and membrane ruptures. Based
on its PK profile and efficacy observed in animal models, we believe OBE022 has the potential to become a first-in-class
therapy to suppress premature labor and delay or avoid preterm birth while also being safe for the fetus. In February 2017,
we completed a Phase 1 clinical trial assessing the safety, tolerability and PK profile of OBE022 in healthy post-
menopausal female volunteers after single doses of 10 mg to 1,300 mg and multiple doses between 100 mg per day and
1,000 mg per day over 7 consecutive days. OBE022 was observed to have a favorable pharmacokinetic profile, no
clinically significant food effect, a favorable safety profile and to be well-tolerated at doses up to 1,300 mg after single dose
administration and up to 1,000 mg per day after multiple dose administration over 7 days, each of which are above the
estimated clinical effective dose. In March 2017, we completed a set of DDI Phase 1 clinical pharmacology studies
investigating the safety, tolerability and PK profile of OBE022 when combined with magnesium sulfate, atosiban,
nifedipine or betamethasone (medications typically used in patients with preterm labor) in pre-menopausal female
volunteers. OBE022 in combination with those drugs was observed to have a favorable safety profile and to be well-
tolerated up to 1,100 mg per day, which was the highest tested dose.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

Background and Impact of Preterm Labor

Preterm labor, defined as the body commencing the birthing process prior to 37 weeks, is characterized by uterine
contractions, cervical dilation and rupture of the fetal membranes that surround and protect the fetus during pregnancy.
According to a study published in the Lancet in 2012, approximately 15 million babies were born preterm in 2010,
accounting for 11.1% of all live births worldwide. In the 65 countries with reliable data for preterm birth, 62 countries had
increasing rates of preterm birth over the period from 1990 to 2010. According to the National Center for Health Statistics,
the United States’ preterm birth rate was 9.6% in 2014, which, according to the March of Dimes Foundation, ranks among
the worst of high-resource countries. In 2007, the Institute of Medicine reported that the cost associated with premature
birth in the United States was approximately $26.2 billion each year.

According to the World Health Organization, preterm birth is the leading worldwide cause of neonatal death, defined as
death in the first 28 days of life. Preterm birth complications are also the leading cause of death in children under the age of
five, having caused nearly one million deaths in 2013 worldwide. Infants who survive preterm birth may have lifelong
health problems such as cerebral palsy, vision and hearing impairment and intellectual disabilities. Approximately one-third
of children born prematurely need special school services, according to the March of Dimes Foundation.

Role of Prostaglandins in Preterm Labor

Prostaglandins play a major role in the normal function of the female reproductive system. There are various prostaglandins
at work in the human body with different functions, such as prostaglandin E2, or PGE2, and PGF 2 . PGE2 and PGF2 have
opposing effects on the female reproductive system. PGE2 causes the widening of blood vessels. PGE2 is produced by the
fetus and is important in fetal physiology and development, and therefore, blocking its action has the potential to produce
unwanted fetal effects. By contrast, PGF2 is a constrictor of the myometrium and uterine blood vessels. PGF2 is present in
the uterus and plays a major role in the initiation and process of childbirth. PGF2 modulates various functions leading to the
progression of labor and is involved in all aspects of childbirth including ripening of the cervix, membrane rupture and
induction of uterine contraction. PGF2 promotes the establishment of a pro-inflammatory intra-uterine environment by
stimulation of pro-inflammatory cytokine and chemokine production in the myometrium, leading to the initiation of labor.

Limitations of Current Treatment Options

Various classes of pharmaceutical agents that decrease uterine contractions, also known as tocolytics, are used to delay
preterm labor. These different classes act on the uterine muscle through various mechanisms of action but have limited
efficacy, restrictive safety issues and are used off-label in the United States. These different classes include nifedipine, a
calcium channel blocker, magnesium sulfate and glyceryl trinitrate, each of which have been observed to have limited
efficacy. Beta-adrenergic agonists have been largely discontinued because of severe maternal cardiovascular side effects.
Atosiban, an oxytocin receptor antagonist, is approved in Europe and can delay preterm labor, but is administered through a
bolus injection followed by an infusion and is not indicated for dosing beyond 48 hours.

Reviews of these different classes of tocolytic drugs concluded that prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, also known as
NSAIDs, provided the best efficacy for delaying labor at 48 hours and seven days. According to a study published in
Obstetrics & Gynecology in 2009, prostaglandin antagonists were most effective at delaying delivery at 48 hours and seven
days among the class of drugs available in the United States. Delaying delivery as long as possible up to full term is ideal,
but delaying delivery by at least 48 hours is significant because a steroid can be administered to the mother to mature the
baby’s lungs so the baby can potentially breathe on its own. The table below, which shows the results of that study,
displays the percentage of patients that did not deliver a baby at various time points following treatment.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Figure 15: Weighted Percentages of Tocolytic Agents for Efficacy

Business Update

Currently available prostaglandin inhibitors, such as the NSAID indomethacin, act by non-selective inhibition of
prostaglandin-forming enzymes, thus blocking the generation and signaling of many prostaglandin sub-types, including
both PGE2 and PGF2. Because they potentially adversely affect fetal physiology through the inhibition of PGE2, NSAIDs
are no longer recommended for pregnant women due to these unwanted side effects. According to a publication in 2015 in
the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, the most concerning side effects associated with the non-selective
prostaglandin inhibitors include severe conditions in newborn babies, such as renal function impairment, constriction of the
blood vessel connecting the pulmonary artery to the aorta, bleeding in the area surrounding the fluid-filled areas of the
brain, necrotizing enterocolitis, which is a serious condition that occurs when the intestinal tissue blood flow is damaged
and begins to die, and periventricular leukomalacia, which is a form of brain injury that can lead to serious disabilities.

As a result of the limited efficacy and unfavorable safety profile of many current therapies used off-label to treat preterm
labor, we believe there remains a significant unmet need for a selective prostaglandin inhibitor focused on the inhibition of
only PGF2 to delay preterm labor and provide a safe treatment option for both mother and child.

Preclinical and Clinical Development

OBE022 was discovered and initially developed by Merck Serono as a selective inhibitor of PGF2. We in-licensed
OBE022 from Merck Serono in 2015. In preclinical studies, OBE022 was observed to reduce uterine contractions and to
exert a synergistic effect in combination with nifedipine to delay delivery. We intend to advanceOBE022 into Phase 2a
Proof-of-Concept clinical trial in the second half of 2017 to assess the safety and efficacy of OBE022 to delay birth in
women 24 to 34 weeks pregnant who face preterm labor and potentially preterm delivery. In February 2017, we completed
a Phase 1 clinical trial assessing the safety, tolerability and PK profile of OBE022 in healthy post-menopausal female
volunteers after single doses of 10 mg to 1,300 mg and multiple doses between 100 mg per day and 1,000 mg per day over
7 consecutive days. OBE022 was observed to have a favorable PK profile, no clinically significant food effect, a favorable
safety profile and to be well-tolerated at doses up to 1,300 mg after single dose administration and up to 1,000 mg per day
after multiple dose administration over 7 days. In March 2017, we completed a set of DDI Phase 1 clinical pharmacology
studies investigating the safety, tolerability and PK profile of OBE022 when combined with magnesium sulfate, atosiban,
nifedipine or betamethasone (medications typically used in patients with preterm labor) in pre-menopausal female
volunteers. OBE022 in combination with those drugs was observed to have a favorable safety profile and to be well-
tolerated up to 1,100 mg per day, which was the highest tested dose.

Preclinical Development

In the preclinical pharmacology, PK and toxicology studies conducted by Merck Serono, OBE022 was observed to be a
highly selective, competitive and reversible PGF2 receptor antagonist with over 100 times the affinity for it compared to
other prostaglandin receptor subtypes. OBE022 has been observed to have tocolytic effects in vitro and in vivo by
markedly reducing spontaneous uterine contractions in a preterm labor animal model. At the Society for Reproductive
Investigations’ 64th Annual Scientific Meeting in March 2017, we presented results of a non-clinical study in which we
observed that OBE022 exerted a synergistic effect in combination with nifedipine on the delay of delivery in an animal
model for preterm labor. The study evaluated the effect of OBE022 and nifedipine, alone and in combination with each
other, on an animal model of RU486-induced birth in pregnant mice. The induction of labor by the antiprogestin RU486
results from inhibition of progesterone activation leading to the up-regulation of labor-associated proteins as seen in the

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

case of idiopathic preterm labor. Compared to the vehicle control, we observed nifedipine (5mg/kg, taken orally), as well as
OBE022 (100mg/kg, taken orally), alone resulted in statistically significant delays in RU486-induced preterm labor. We
also observed a synergistic effect of combination treatment with OBE022 and nifedipine on the delay of delivery when
compared to vehicle, nifedipine or OBE022 alone (p<0.001, p<0.001 and p<0.01, respectively). Preclinical studies have
also been conducted to support oral administration of OBE022 in humans. Overall, the toxicological profile of OBE022
observed in repeated-dose toxicity studies in rats and dogs appeared to be benign. We also conducted safety studies to
evaluate OBE022 compared to NSAIDs in pregnant rats prior to delivery. In these studies, we observed that the NSAID
indomethacin induced constriction of the blood vessel connecting the pulmonary artery to the aorta and impaired the renal
function in the newborn rats, while OBE022 did not. In addition, we have observed that OBE022 does not inhibit platelet
aggregation whereas the NSAIDs were confirmed to significantly inhibit it, which is considered to be a potential risk factor
for neonatal tissue hemorrhagia, e.g. periventricular brain hemorrhagia. Based on the results of these preclinical studies, we
believe that OBE022 has the potential to be an effective, safer tocolytic agent for the treatment of preterm labor.

Clinical Development Plan

We completed a Phase 1 clinical trial assessing the safety, tolerability and PK profile of OBE022 when administered in
approximately 70 healthy post-menopausal female volunteers as single and multiple ascending doses at one site in the
United Kingdom. As PGF2 is also involved in uterine contractions and the related pain that can occur during normal
menstruation in non-pregnant women, we are assessing the feasibility of measuring the ability of OBE022 to reduce the
intra-uterine pressure and the pelvic pain scores in healthy female volunteers of child bearing age during menstruation.
From the single doses administered of 10 mg to 1,300 mg and multiple doses between 100 mg per day and 1,000 mg per
day administered over 7 consecutive days in the completed Phase 1 clinical trial, OBE022 was observed to be readily
absorbed and converted into the active stable metabolite OBE002. Exposure to OBE002 increased with dose of OBE022
and reached clinically meaningful exposure levels within an hour after administration which is an important feature for
orally administered preterm labor treatments. Median OBE002 half-lives have been observed to be between 7 and 15 hours,
which we believe is an adequate half-life for OBE022 to have once daily or twice daily dosing. Preliminary plasma
concentration-time data is presented in Figure 16 below. Concomitant administration with food resulted in decreased peak
exposures, but we believe this effect was not clinically significant and believe that OBE022 can be taken with or without
food. Single and multiple administrations of OBE022 were well tolerated at all doses. There have been no serious adverse
events and no clinically relevant changes in safety parameters.

Figure 16:

We also completed a set of DDI Phase 1 clinical pharmacology studies investigating the safety, tolerability and PK profile
of OBE022 when combined with therapeutic doses of magnesium sulfate, atosiban, nifedipine or betamethasone
(medications typically used in patients with preterm labor) in pre-menopausal female volunteers. OBE022 in combination
with those drugs was observed to have a favorable safety profile and to be well-tolerated up 1,100 mg per day, which was
the highest tested dose.

Based on these Phase 1 clinical trial results, we intend to advance OBE022 in the second half of 2017 into a Phase 2a
proof-of-concept clinical trial. The trial objectives will be to assess the safety and efficacy of OBE022 to delay birth after
oral administration in pregnant women who face preterm labor and potentially preterm delivery. The targeted patient
population will include women who are at least 24 and less than 34 weeks pregnant, with intact membranes, presenting
with spontaneous preterm labor and no contraindications to a prolongation of pregnancy. Giving birth between 34 weeks
and 37 weeks is generally not viewed as high risk to the baby and therefore using pharmaceutical agents to delay child birth
is controversial during this period.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

Commercialization

We have not yet established a sales, marketing or product distribution infrastructure. In order to commercialize any of our
product candidates if approved for commercial sale, we must either establish a sales and marketing organization with
technical expertise and supporting distribution capabilities or collaborate with third-parties that have sales and marketing
experience. As we move our product candidates through development toward regulatory approval we will evaluate several
options for each product candidate’s commercialization strategy. These options include building our own internal sales
force, entering into a joint marketing partnership with another pharmaceutical or biotechnology company, or out-licensing
the product to another pharmaceutical or biotechnology company.

Manufacturing

We rely on CMOs to produce our product candidates in accordance with the FDA’s cGMP regulations for use in our
clinical trials. The manufacture of pharmaceuticals is subject to extensive cGMP regulations, which impose various
procedural and documentation requirements and govern all areas of record keeping, production processes and controls,
personnel and quality control. Replacement of any of our CMOs would require us to qualify new manufacturers and
negotiate and execute contractual agreements with them. If any of our supply or service agreements with our CMOs are
terminated, we will experience delays and additional expenses in the completion of the development of and obtaining
regulatory approval for OBE2109, nolasiban and OBE022.

To meet our projected needs for clinical supplies to support our activities through regulatory approval and commercial
manufacturing, the CMOs with whom we currently work will need to increase scale of production or we will need to secure
alternate suppliers. Pursuant to the Kissei license and supply agreement, we have agreed to exclusively purchase the active
pharmaceutical ingredient for OBE2109 from Kissei. The CMO that Kissei is using to supply the active pharmaceutical
ingredient for OBE2019 received a warning letter from the FDA in November 2016 citing deviations from cGMP
requirements with respect to its drug manufacturing facility. Kissei is working with the CMO to completely correct all
deviations cited in the warning letter and Kissei is currently qualifying alternate OBE2109 cGMP API suppliers. For
nolasiban and OBE022, we obtain supply on a purchase order basis from a single source. However, we believe that there
are multiple potential sources for our contract manufacturing for nolasiban and OBE022. We have not engaged alternate
suppliers in the event that our current CMO for nolasiban and OBE022 is unable to scale production or suffer disruption to
their supply. If we are unable to obtain sufficient quantities of our products candidates or receive raw materials in a timely
manner, we could be required to delay our ongoing clinical trials and seek alternative manufacturers, which would be costly
and time-consuming.

The CMOs with whom we currently work will also need to ensure and maintain quality (specifications, shelf-life, expiry,
in-process-control) throughout the production process of our clinical and commercial supplies. If we are unable to ensure
and maintain quality of our products candidates, we could be required to delay our ongoing clinical trials which would be
costly and time-consuming.

To mitigate the risks above, our relationships with CMOs are managed by internal personnel with extensive experience in
NCE pharmaceutical development and chemistry, manufacturing and controls, or CMC.

Competition

Biopharmaceutical product development is highly competitive and subject to rapid and significant technological
advancements. Our success is highly dependent upon our ability to in-license, acquire, develop and obtain regulatory
approval for new and innovative products on a cost-effective basis and to market them successfully. In doing so, we face
and will continue to face intense competition from a variety of businesses, including large, fully integrated, well-
established pharmaceutical companies who already possess a large share of the market, specialty pharmaceutical and
biopharmaceutical companies, academic institutions, government agencies and other private and public research institutions
in the European Union, United States and other jurisdictions.

With respect to OBE2109, there are no GnRH antagonists currently approved for the treatment of pain associated with
endometriosis or heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids. However, we are aware that AbbVie Inc.,
Myovant Sciences, Inc. and Astellas Pharma Inc. are developing GnRH antagonist product candidates for treatment of
symptoms associated with endometriosis or uterine fibroids. We also anticipate competing with GnRH agonists, including

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

Lupron (leuprolide acetate), marketed by AbbVie Inc. and Takeda Pharmaceuticals, Visanne, which is approved for the
treatment of endometriosis outside the United States and marketed by Bayer, ulipristal acetate, which is approved for the
treatment of moderate-to-severe symptoms of uterine fibroids outside the United States and marketed by Gedeon Richter in
Europe and other regions, and by Actavis (Allergan) in Canada. Actavis (Allergan) has stated that it expects to submit an
NDA for ulipristal acetate with the FDA in 2017. In addition, oral contraceptives and NSAIDs are routinely used as a first-
line therapy for treatment of symptoms associated with endometriosis and uterine fibroids and have a meaningful success
rate at mitigating the symptoms associated with these conditions.

With respect to nolasiban, there are no oxytocin receptor antagonists approved for use in connection with IVF. However,
we are aware that Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc. has been developing barusiban, an oxytocin receptor antagonist, to be
administered subcutaneously, for use in connection with IVF. Ferring Pharmaceuticals’ atosiban, an oxytocin receptor
antagonist, has been used in investigator initiated trials in connection with IVF outside the United States.

With respect to OBE022, we anticipate competing with atosiban, which has been approved to delay preterm birth outside of
the United States, as well as currently available calcium channel blockers, such as nifedipine or prostaglandin inhibitors,
such as NSAIDs. We are also aware that GlaxoSmithKline is developing retosiban, an oxytocin receptor antagonist, to
delay preterm birth.

We may also compete with other companies acquiring and developing or marketing drug therapies or products for women’s
reproductive health diseases.

Many of the companies against which we are competing or against which we may compete in the future have significantly
greater financial resources and expertise in research and development, manufacturing, preclinical testing, conducting
clinical trials, obtaining regulatory approvals and marketing approved drugs than we do. Mergers and acquisitions in the
biopharmaceutical industry could result in even more resources being concentrated among a small number of our
competitors. Smaller or early-stage companies may also prove to be significant competitors, particularly through
collaborative arrangements with large and established companies. These third parties compete with us in recruiting and
retaining qualified scientific and management personnel, establishing clinical trial sites and patient registration for clinical
trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs.

Our commercial opportunity could be reduced or eliminated if our competitors develop and commercialize products that
are safer, more effective, have fewer or less severe side effects, are more convenient or are less expensive than OBE2109,
nolasiban or OBE022 or any other product candidate that we may develop. Our competitors also may obtain FDA or other
regulatory approval for their product candidates more rapidly than we may obtain approval for our product candidates,
which could result in our competitors establishing a strong market position before we are able to enter the market. Any new
product that competes with an approved product must demonstrate compelling advantages in efficacy, convenience,
tolerability and safety in order to overcome price competition and to be commercially successful.

In addition, established biopharmaceutical companies may invest heavily to accelerate discovery and development of novel
compounds or to in-license novel compounds that could make OBE2109, nolasiban, OBE022 or any of our future product
candidates less competitive.

Intellectual Property

We have filed numerous patent applications and have licensed numerous issued patents and patent applications pertaining
to our product candidates and methods of manufacture and clinical use. We strive to protect and enhance the proprietary
technology, inventions, and improvements that are commercially important to the development of our business by seeking,
maintaining and defending our intellectual property, whether developed internally or licensed from third parties. For
additional information regarding the license agreements to which we are a party, see the sections entitled “2013 License
Agreement with Merck Serono,” “2015 License Agreement with Merck Serono” and “License and Supply Agreement with
Kissei.” We also rely on trade secrets, know-how, continuing technological innovation and potential in-licensing
opportunities to develop, strengthen and maintain our proprietary position in the field of reproductive healthcare.
Additionally, we intend to rely on regulatory protection afforded through data exclusivity and market exclusivity, as well as
patent term extensions, where available.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

As of March 31, 2017, our patent portfolio as it pertains to certain of our product candidates included:

•

six U.S. patent applications, projected to expire between 2034 and 2037, as well as corresponding patent
applications internationally, directed to nolasiban compositions of matter and uses of nolasiban in artificial
reproductive technology and for the treatment of preterm labor; and

• one international (PCT) application, which, if granted in the United States, projects to expire in 2037, directed

to OBE022 compositions of matter and uses of OBE022 for the treatment of preterm labor.

As of March 31, 2017, our in-licensed patent portfolio as it pertains to certain of our product candidates included:

• one U.S. patent, projected to expire in 2023, as well as corresponding patents and patent applications

internationally, directed to nolasiban compositions of matter and uses of nolasiban for the treatment of preterm
labor;

•

two U.S. patents, projected to expire between 2024 and 2036, as well as corresponding patents and patent
applications internationally, one U.S. patent application, projected to expire in 2036, and one PCT application,
which, if granted in the U.S., projects to expire in 2037, directed to OBE022 compositions of matter and uses
of OBE022 for the treatment of preterm labor; and

two U.S. patents, projected to expire between 2030 and 2032, as well as corresponding patents and patent
applications internationally outside of specified Asian countries, as well as one U.S. patent application,
projected to expire in 2031, directed to OBE2109 compositions of matter and uses of OBE2109 for the
treatment of sex hormone-dependent diseases.

The terms of individual patents may vary based on the countries in which they are obtained. Generally, patents issued for
applications filed in the United States are effective for 20 years from the earliest effective non-provisional filing date in the
absence, for example, of a terminal disclaimer shortening the term of the patent or patent term adjustment increasing the
term of the patent. In addition, in certain instances, a patent term can be extended to recapture a portion of the term
effectively lost as a result of FDA regulatory review periods. The restoration period cannot be longer than five years and
the total patent term, including the restoration period, must not exceed 14 years following FDA approval. The duration of
patents outside of the United States varies in accordance with provisions of applicable local law, but typically is also 20
years from the earliest effective non-provisional filing date.

In addition to patents and patent applications that we own and license, we rely on trade secrets and know-how to develop
and maintain our competitive position. However, trade secrets can be difficult to protect. We seek to protect our proprietary
technology and processes, and obtain and maintain ownership of certain technologies, in part, through confidentiality
agreements and invention assignment agreements with our employees, consultants, scientific advisors, contractors, and
commercial partners.

Our future commercial success depends, in part, on our ability to obtain and maintain patent and other proprietary
protection for commercially important technology, inventions and know-how related to our business; defend and enforce
our patents; preserve the confidentiality of our trade secrets; and operate without infringing valid enforceable patents and
proprietary rights of third parties. Our ability to stop third parties from making, using, selling, offering to sell, or importing
our products may depend on the extent to which we have rights under valid and enforceable patents or trade secrets that
cover these activities. With respect to our owned and licensed intellectual property, we cannot be sure that patents will
issue from any of the pending patent applications to which we own or license rights or from any patent applications that we
or our licensors may file in the future, nor can we be sure that any of our licensed patents or any patents that may be issued
in the future to us or to our licensors will be commercially useful in protecting our product candidates and methods of using
or manufacturing the same. Moreover, we may be unable to obtain patent protection for certain aspects of our product
candidates generally, as well as with respect to certain indications.

2013 License Agreement with Merck Serono

In August 2013, we entered into a license agreement, or the 2013 license agreement, with Merck Serono, pursuant to which
we received a worldwide exclusive license to develop, manufacture and commercialize compounds covered by the licensed
patent rights, including nolasiban, which we are developing for the treatment of conditions associated with ART. In
consideration for the license, we issued 914,069 Series A preferred shares to Merck Serono at the time of our Series A
financing, which had a fair-value of $4.9 million. With respect to any products we commercialize under the 2013 license

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

agreement, we have agreed to pay Merck Serono quarterly royalties based on our annual net sales of each product at a high-
single-digit percentage of annual net sales, subject to specified reductions, until the later of the date that all of the patent
rights for that product have expired, as determined on a country-by-country and product-by-product basis, or ten years from
the first commercial sale of such product on a country-by-country and product-by-product basis.

We are solely responsible for the development and commercialization of the product candidates licensed under the 2013
license agreement. Merck Serono has the first right to maintain, prosecute, and even enforce the licensed patent rights. The
2013 license agreement expires on the date of expiration of all royalty obligations, at which time our license becomes fully
paid-up, irrevocable, and perpetual. Either party may terminate the 2013 license agreement earlier for an uncured material
breach, subject to notice requirements and specified exceptions. Merck may terminate the 2013 license agreement if we or
any of our affiliates or sublicensees challenge the licensed patent rights or in the event of our bankruptcy if we do not
obtain a sublicensee within two years thereafter. We may also terminate the 2013 license agreement without cause at any
time upon advance written notice to Merck Serono. Upon any termination, all license granted to us under the 2013 license
agreement terminate.

2015 License Agreement with Merck Serono

In June 2015, we entered into a second license agreement with Merck Serono, or the 2015 license agreement, which we
amended in July 2016, pursuant to which we received a worldwide exclusive license to develop, manufacture and
commercialize compounds covered by the licensed patent rights, including OBE022, which we are developing for the
treatment of preterm labor in weeks 24 to 34 of pregnancy. In consideration for the license, we agreed to issue 325,000
Series A preferred shares to Merck Serono upon the initiation of a Phase 1 clinical trial for a licensed product. With respect
to any products we commercialize under the 2015 license agreement, we have agreed to pay Merck Serono quarterly
royalties based on our annual net sales of each product at a mid-single-digit percentage of annual net sales, subject to
specified reductions, until the later of the date that all of the patent rights for that product have expired, as determined on a
country-by-country and product-by-product basis or ten years from the first commercial sale of such product on a country-
by-country and product-by-product basis.

We are solely responsible for the development and commercialization of the product candidates licensed under the 2015
license agreement. Merck Serono has the first right to maintain, prosecute, and even enforce the licensed patent rights. The
2015 license agreement expires on the date of expiration of all royalty obligations, at which time our license becomes fully
paid-up, irrevocable and perpetual. Either party may terminate the 2015 license agreement earlier for an uncured material
breach, subject to notice requirements and specified exceptions. Merck may terminate the 2015 license agreement if we or
any of our affiliates or sublicensees challenge the licensed patent rights or in the event of our bankruptcy if we do not
obtain a sublicensee within two years thereafter. We may also terminate the agreement without cause at any time upon
advance written notice to Merck Serono. Upon any termination, all license granted to us under the 2015 license agreement
terminate.

License and Supply Agreement with Kissei

In November 2015, we entered into a license and supply agreement, or the Kissei license and supply agreement, with
Kissei. Pursuant to the Kissei license and supply agreement we received an exclusive license to develop, manufacture and
commercialize products, or the Product, containing the compounds which is a specified GnRH antagonist and covered by
certain licensed patent rights, or the Compound, throughout the world except for specified Asian countries and we arranged
to exclusively acquire from Kissei the material necessary to produce OBE2109. Under the Kissei license and supply
agreement, we are developing OBE2109 for the treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids and
pain associated with endometriosis. The agreement also establishes a joint development committee, and upon the filing of
regulatory approval, a joint marketing committee, each of which shall be composed of an equal number of representatives
for each party, which will exchange information and monitor progress in the development and marketing of the Product,
respectively. We must use commercially reasonable efforts to develop, manufacture and commercialize the Compound and
the Product. We and Kissei will share development data and regulatory filings from our respective territories with one
another. Further, we granted Kissei an exclusive license under any of our know-how and patents related to inventions or
improvements resulting from our activities under the Kissei license and supply agreement, for Kissei to use in exploiting
the Compound and the Product in their retained territory.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

In consideration for the license, we made an initial $10.0 million upfront payment. In addition, we have agreed to make
aggregate milestone payments of up to $63.0 million upon the achievement of specified developmental milestones, such as
the initiation of clinical trials and receipt of regulatory approvals. With respect to any Product we commercialize under the
Kissei license and supply agreement, we have agreed to make additional aggregate milestone payments of up to
$125.0 million to Kissei upon the achievement of specified commercial milestones.

Pursuant to the Kissei license and supply agreement, we have agreed to exclusively purchase the active pharmaceutical
ingredient for OBE2109 from Kissei. During the development stage, we are obligated to pay Kissei a specified supply
price. Following the first commercial sale of licensed product, we are obligated to pay Kissei a royalty payment in the low
twenty percent range as a percentage of net sales, which includes payment for Kissei’s supply of the active pharmaceutical
ingredient until the latest of the date that the valid claim of a patent for the Product has expired, the expiration of our
regulatory exclusivity period or 15 years from the first commercial sale of such product on a country-by-country and
product-by-product basis. During the term, we are restricted from developing, marketing and selling GnRH agonists and
GnRH antagonists other than the Compound to the extent allowed by applicable laws.

We are solely responsible, at our expense, for the development and commercialization of the Product candidates licensed
under the Kissei license and supply agreement in the licensed territory. Kissei has the responsibility to maintain and
prosecute the licensed patent rights in the licensed territory and we have the right to enforce any of them in the event that
Kissei abandons it. The Kissei license and supply agreement terminates on the date of expiration of all royalty obligations,
unless we elect to continue to purchase the Compound from Kissei after the expiration of all royalty obligations. Either
party may terminate the Kissei license and supply agreement earlier for an uncured breach, subject to notice requirements
and specified exceptions, including that Kissei has the option to convert the exclusive licenses granted to us to non-
exclusive if we breach the agreement and fail to cure within a specified time period. We may also terminate the agreement
for scientific, commercial, strategic or intellectual property reasons at any time upon advance written notice to Kissei.
Kissei may also terminate the agreement if we do not fulfill certain development-related obligations for a specified period
of time, or if, in connection with a change of control by us, we do not fulfill certain diligence obligations for a specified
period of time. Further, under the terms of the Kissei license and supply agreement, Kissei is obligated to have a backup
supplier based on the pharmaceutical industry standard. We may only gain the right to obtain a second source of the supply
of OBE2109 upon Kissei failing to deliver a substantial percentage of the requested supply, delivering the supply late or
delivering the supply of OBE2019 in nonconforming manner; provided that Kissei has a specified period of time to cure
any of these defects. Further, we and Kissei are each obligated to maintain a specified percentage of supply in excess of the
estimate for yearly requirements that we submit to Kissei.

Government Regulation
FDA Drug Approval Process

In the United States, pharmaceutical products are subject to extensive regulation by the FDA. The Federal Food, Drug, and
Cosmetic Act, or FDCA, and other federal and state statutes and regulations, govern, among other things, the research,
development, testing, manufacture, storage, recordkeeping, approval, labeling, promotion and marketing, distribution, post-
approval monitoring and reporting, sampling and import and export of pharmaceutical products. To obtain regulatory
approvals in the United States and in foreign countries, and subsequently comply with applicable statutes and regulations,
we will need to spend substantial time and financial resources.

Approval Process

The FDA must approve any new drug or a drug with certain changes to a previously approved drug before a company can
market it in the United States. Failure to comply with applicable U.S. requirements may subject a company to a variety of
administrative or judicial sanctions, such as FDA refusal to approve pending applications, warning or untitled letters,
clinical holds, withdrawal of an approval, product recalls, product seizures, total or partial suspension of production or
distribution, injunctions, fines, refusals of government contracts, restitution, disgorgement, civil penalties or criminal
prosecution.

The steps required before a drug may be marketed in the United States generally include the following:

•

completion of extensive preclinical laboratory tests, animal studies and CMC studies, all performed in
accordance with the FDA’s Good Laboratory Practice, or GLP, regulations;

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

•

submission to the FDA of an IND application for human clinical testing, which must become effective before
human clinical trials may begin. The sponsor must update the IND annually;
approval of the study by an IRB or ethics committee at each site before the study begins;

performance of adequate and well-controlled human clinical trials in accordance with good clinical practice, or
GCP, requirements to establish the safety and efficacy of the drug for each proposed indication to the FDA’s
satisfaction;
submission to the FDA of an NDA after completion of all clinical trials;

potential review of the drug application by an FDA advisory committee, if applicable;

satisfactory completion of an FDA inspection of the manufacturing facility or facilities at which the products is
produced to assess compliance with cGMP regulations and to assure that the facilities, methods and controls
are adequate to preserve the drug’s identity; and

FDA review and approval of the NDA prior to any commercial marketing or sale of the drug in the United
States.

Satisfaction of FDA pre-market approval requirements typically takes many years and the actual time required may vary
substantially based upon the type, complexity and novelty of the product or disease.

Preclinical tests include laboratory evaluation of product chemistry, formulation and toxicity, as well as animal trials to
assess the characteristics and potential safety and efficacy of the product. The conduct of the preclinical tests must comply
with federal regulations and requirements, including GLP. The company submits the results of the preclinical testing,
together with manufacturing information, analytical data and any available clinical data or literature to the FDA as part of
an IND along with other information, including information about product CMC and a proposed clinical trial protocol.
Long term preclinical tests, such as animal tests of reproductive toxicity and carcinogenicity, may continue after submitting
the initial IND.

The FDA requires a 30-day waiting period after the submission of each IND before the company can begin clinical testing
in humans. The FDA may, within the 30-day time period, raise concerns or questions relating to one or more proposed
clinical trials and place the study on a clinical hold. In such a case, the company and the FDA must resolve any outstanding
concerns before the company may begin the clinical trial. Accordingly, the submission of an IND may or may not be
sufficient to permit the sponsor to start a clinical trial. If, following the 30-day period, the FDA does not raise any concerns
regarding the IND submission, the company may begin clinical testing under the IND. The company must also make a
separate submission to an existing IND for each successive clinical trial conducted during drug development.

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials involve administering the investigational new drug to healthy volunteers or patient trials under the
supervision of a qualified investigator. The company must conduct clinical trials:

•

in compliance with federal regulations;

in compliance with GCP, an international standard meant to protect the rights and health of patients and to
define the roles of clinical trial sponsors, administrators, and monitors; as well as

under protocols detailing the objectives of the trial, the safety monitoring parameters, and the effectiveness
criteria to be evaluated.

The FDA may order the temporary, or permanent, discontinuation of a clinical trial at any time, or impose other sanctions,
if it believes that the sponsor is not conducting the clinical trial in accordance with FDA requirements or presents an
unacceptable risk to the clinical trial patients. The sponsor must also submit the study protocol, any amendments to
protocols and informed consent information for patients in clinical trials to an IRB for approval at each site at which the
clinical trial will be conducted. An IRB may halt the clinical trial, either temporarily or permanently, for failure to comply
with the IRB’s requirements, or may impose other conditions. Information about certain clinical trials and their results must
be also submitted within specific timeframes to the National Institutes of Health, or NIH, for public dissemination on their
www.clinicaltrials.gov website.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

Companies generally divide the clinical investigation of a drug into three or four phases. While companies usually conduct
these phases sequentially, they are sometimes overlapped or combined.

•

Phase 1. These trials typically evaluate the safety, dosage tolerance, metabolism and pharmacologic actions of
the investigational new drug in humans, the side effects associated with increasing doses, and if possible, gain
early evidence on effectiveness. Other Phase 1 or clinical pharmacology studies generally evaluate the drug for
potential DDI, cardiovascular safety and special population interactions. These studies, if needed, are to be
conducted prior to NDA submission but may be conducted in parallel to Phase 2 and Phase 3.

Phase 2. The drug is administered to a limited patient population to evaluate dosage tolerance and optimal
dosage, identify possible adverse side effects and safety risks, and preliminarily evaluate efficacy. Phase 2
trials may be denoted as Phase 2a, wherein initial dose-response relationship is explored, and Phase 2b,
wherein dose ranging and proof of concept is targeted.

Phase 3. The drug is administered to an expanded patient population, generally at geographically dispersed
clinical trial sites, in well-controlled clinical trials to generate enough data to statistically evaluate dosage,
clinical effectiveness and safety, to establish the overall benefit-risk relationship of the investigational drug,
and to provide an adequate basis for labeling and product approval.

• Phase 4. In some cases, the FDA may condition approval of an NDA for a drug on the company’s agreement to
conduct additional clinical trials after approval. In other cases, a sponsor may voluntarily conduct additional
clinical trials after approval to gain more information about the drug. Companies typically refer to such post-
approval trials as Phase 4 clinical trials.

The FDA, the IRB, or the clinical trial sponsor may suspend or terminate a clinical trial at any time on various grounds,
including a finding that the research patients are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk. Similarly, an IRB can
suspend or terminate approval of a clinical trial at its institution if the clinical trial is not being conducted in accordance
with the IRB’s requirements or if the drug has been associated with unexpected serious harm to patients. Additionally, an
independent group of qualified experts organized by the clinical trial sponsor, known as a data safety monitoring board or
committee, may oversee some clinical trials. This group provides authorization for whether or not a trial may move forward
at designated check points based on access to certain data from the trial. We may also suspend or terminate a clinical trial
based on evolving business objectives and the competitive climate.

Submission of an NDA

After we complete the required preclinical, CMC and clinical testing, we can prepare and submit an NDA to the FDA, who
must approve the NDA before we can start marketing the drug in the United States. An NDA must include all relevant data
available from pertinent preclinical studies and clinical trials, including negative or ambiguous results as well as positive
findings, together with detailed information relating to the drug’s chemistry, manufacturing, controls, and proposed
labeling, among other things. Data can come from company-sponsored clinical trials on a drug, or from a number of
alternative sources, including studies initiated by investigators. To support marketing authorization, the data we submit
must be sufficient in quality and quantity to establish the safety and effectiveness of the investigational drug to the FDA’s
satisfaction.

The cost of preparing and submitting an NDA is substantial. The submission of most NDAs is additionally subject to a
substantial application user fee, and the manufacturer or sponsor under an approved NDA are also subject to annual drug
and establishment user fees. The FDA typically increases these fees annually.

The FDA has 60 days from its receipt of an NDA to determine whether it will accept the application for filing based on the
agency’s threshold determination that the application is sufficiently complete to permit substantive review. The FDA may
request additional information rather than accept an NDA for filing. In this event, the application must be resubmitted with
the additional information. The resubmitted application is also subject to review before the FDA accepts it for filing. Once
the submission is accepted for filing, the FDA begins an in-depth substantive review. The FDA reviews an NDA to
determine, among other things, whether the drug is safe and effective and whether the facility in which it is manufactured,
processed, packaged or held meets standards designed to assure the product’s continued safety, quality and purity. Once the
FDA accepts the filing, the FDA begins an in-depth review. The FDA has agreed to certain performance goals in the review
of NDAs. Under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act, the FDA has a goal of responding to standard review NDAs within
ten months after the 60-day filing review period, but this timeframe is often extended. The FDA reviews most applications

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

for standard review drugs within ten to 12 months and most applications for priority review drugs within six to eight
months. Priority review can be applied to drugs that the FDA determines offer major advances in treatment, or provide a
treatment where no adequate therapy exists.

In addition, under the Pediatric Research Equity Act of 2003, as amended and reauthorized, certain NDAs or supplements
to an NDA must contain data that are adequate to assess the safety and effectiveness of the drug for the claimed indications
in all relevant pediatric subpopulations, and to support dosing and administration for each pediatric subpopulation for
which the product is safe and effective. The FDA may, on its own initiative or at the request of the applicant, grant
deferrals for submission of some or all pediatric data until after approval of the product for use in adults, or full or partial
waivers from the pediatric data requirements.

The FDA may also refer applications for novel drug products, or drug products that present difficult questions of safety or
efficacy, to an advisory committee. This is typically a panel that includes clinicians and other experts that will review,
evaluate, and recommend whether the FDA should approve the application. The FDA is not bound by the recommendation
of an advisory committee, but it generally follows such recommendations. Before approving an NDA, the FDA will
typically inspect one or more clinical sites to assure compliance with GCP, and will inspect the facility or the facilities at
which the drug is manufactured. The FDA will not approve the product unless compliance with cGMP is satisfactory and
the NDA contains data that provide evidence that the drug is safe and effective in the indication studied.

The FDA’s Decision on an NDA

After the FDA evaluates the NDA and all related information, including the advisory committee recommendation, if any,
and inspection reports regarding the manufacturing facilities and clinical trial sites, it issues either an approval letter or a
complete response letter. A complete response letter indicates that the FDA has completed its review of the application, and
the agency has determined that it will not approve the application in its present form. A complete response letter generally
outlines the deficiencies in the submission and may require substantial additional clinical data or other significant,
expensive, and time-consuming requirements related to clinical trials, preclinical studies or manufacturing. The FDA has
committed to reviewing resubmissions of the NDA addressing such deficiencies in two or six months, depending on the
type of information included. Even with the submission of this additional information, the FDA may ultimately decide that
the NDA does not satisfy the criteria for approval. The government may establish additional requirements, including those
resulting from new legislation, or the FDA’s policies may change, which could delay or prevent regulatory approval of our
drugs under development.

An approval letter authorizes commercial marketing of the drug with specific prescribing information for specific
indications. As a condition of NDA approval, the FDA may require an REMS, to help ensure that the benefits of the drug
outweigh the potential risks. REMS can include medication guides, communication plans for healthcare professionals,
special training or certification for prescribing or dispensing, dispensing only under certain circumstances, special
monitoring, and the use of patient registries. The requirement for REMS can materially affect the potential market and
profitability of the drug. Moreover, the FDA may condition approval on substantial post-approval testing and surveillance
to monitor the drug’s safety or efficacy.

Changes to some of the conditions established in an approved application, including changes in indications, labeling, or
manufacturing processes or facilities, require submission and FDA approval of a new NDA or NDA supplement before we
can implement the change. An NDA supplement for a new indication typically requires clinical data similar to that in the
original application, and the FDA uses the same procedures and actions in reviewing NDA supplements as it does in
reviewing new NDAs. As with new NDAs, the FDA often significantly extends the review process with requests for
additional information or clarification.

Post-approval Requirements

The FDA regulates products that are manufactured or distributed pursuant to FDA approvals and has specific requirements
pertaining to recordkeeping, periodic reporting, product sampling and distribution, advertising and promotion and reporting
of adverse experiences with the product. After approval, the FDA must provide review and approval for most changes to
the approved product, such as adding new indications or other labeling claims. There also are continuing, annual user fee
requirements for any marketed products and the establishments who manufacture our products, as well as new application
fees for supplemental applications with clinical data.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

In some cases, the FDA may condition approval of an NDA for a product on the sponsor’s agreement to conduct additional
clinical trials after approval. In other cases, a sponsor may voluntarily conduct additional clinical trials after approval to
gain more information about the product. Such post-approval trials are typically referred to as Phase 4 clinical trials.

In addition, drug manufacturers and other entities involved in the manufacture and distribution of approved drugs are
required to register their establishments with the FDA and state agencies, and are subject to periodic unannounced
inspections by the FDA and state agencies for compliance with cGMP requirements. There are strict regulations regarding
changes to the manufacturing process, and, depending on the significance of the change, it may require prior FDA approval
before we can implement it. FDA regulations also require investigation and correction of any deviations from cGMP and
impose reporting and documentation requirements upon us and any third-party manufacturers that we may decide to use.
Accordingly, manufacturers must continue to expend time, money and effort in the area of production and quality control to
maintain compliance with cGMP and other aspects of regulatory compliance.

The FDA may withdraw approval if a company does not comply with regulatory requirements and maintain standards or if
problems occur after the product reaches the market. If a company or the FDA discovers previously unknown problems
with a product, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, issues with manufacturing processes, or the
company’s failure to comply with regulatory requirements, the FDA may revise the approved labeling to add new safety
information; impose post-marketing trials or other clinical trials to assess new safety risks; or impose distribution or other
restrictions under a REMS program. Other potential consequences may include:

•

restrictions on the marketing or manufacturing of the product, complete withdrawal of the product from the
market or product recalls;
fines, warning letters or holds on post-approval clinical trials;

the FDA refusing to approve pending NDAs or supplements to approved NDAs, or suspending or revoking of
product license approvals;

• product seizure or detention, or refusal to permit the import or export of products; or

•

injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties.

The FDA strictly regulates marketing, labeling, advertising, and promotion of products that are placed on the market.
Products may be promoted only for the approved indications and in accordance with the provisions of the approved label.
The FDA and other agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses. We
could be subject to significant liability if we violated these laws and regulations.

Healthcare Reform

In the United States, the European Union and foreign jurisdictions, the legislative landscape continues to evolve. There
have been a number of legislative and regulatory changes to the healthcare system that could affect our future results of
operations. In particular, there have been and continue to be a number of initiatives at the United States federal and state
levels that seek to reduce healthcare costs. In March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by
the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, or collectively, the ACA, was enacted, which includes measures that
have significantly changed health care financing by both governmental and private insurers. The provisions of the ACA of
importance to the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry are, among others, the following:

•

an annual, nondeductible fee on any entity that manufactures or imports certain branded prescription drugs
agents and biologic agents, which is apportioned among these entities according to their market share in certain
government healthcare programs;

an increase in the rebates a manufacturer must pay under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program to 23.1% and
13% of the average manufacturer price for branded and generic drugs, respectively;

a new Medicare Part D coverage gap discount program, in which manufacturers must agree to offer 50% point-
of-sale discounts to negotiated prices of applicable brand drugs to eligible beneficiaries during their coverage
gap period, as a condition for the manufacturer’s outpatient drugs to be covered under Medicare Part D;

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

•

extension of manufacturers’ Medicaid rebate liability to covered drugs dispensed to individuals who are
enrolled in Medicaid managed care organizations, unless the drug is subject to discounts under the 340B drug
discount program;

a new methodology by which rebates owed by manufacturers under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program are
calculated for drugs that are inhaled, infused, instilled, implanted or injected;

expansion of eligibility criteria for Medicaid programs by, among other things, allowing states to offer
Medicaid coverage to additional individuals and by adding new mandatory eligibility categories for certain
individuals with income at or below 133% of the federal poverty level, thereby potentially increasing
manufacturers’ Medicaid rebate liability;

•

expansion of the entities eligible for discounts under the Public Health Service pharmaceutical pricing
program;

• new requirements under the federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act for drug manufacturers to report

information related to payments and other transfers of value made to physicians and teaching hospitals as well
as ownership or investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members;

•

a new Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute to oversee, identify priorities in, and conduct comparative
clinical effectiveness research, along with funding for such research;

creation of the Independent Payment Advisory Board, which has authority to recommend certain changes to the
Medicare program that could result in reduced payments for prescription drugs and those recommendations
could have the effect of law unless overruled by a supermajority vote of Congress; and

establishment of a Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation at the CMS to test innovative payment and
service delivery models to lower Medicare and Medicaid spending, potentially including prescription drug
spending.

There have been judicial and Congressional challenges to certain aspects of the ACA, and we expect there will be
additional challenges and amendments to the ACA in the future. The current administration and Congress will likely
continue to seek legislative and regulatory changes, including repeal and replacement of certain provisions of the ACA. In
January 2017, President Trump signed an Executive Order directing federal agencies with authorities and responsibilities
under the ACA to waive, defer, grant exemptions from, or delay the implementation of any provision of the ACA that
would impose a fiscal or regulatory burden on states, individuals, healthcare providers, health insurers, or manufacturers of
pharmaceuticals or medical devices. In March 2017, following the passage of the budget resolution for fiscal year 2017, the
U.S. House of Representatives introduced legislation known as the American Health Care Act, which, if enacted, would
have amended or repealed significant portions of the ACA. However, consensus over the scope of the American Health
Care Act could not be reached by its proponents in the U.S. House of Representatives. Thus, the proposed legislation has
been withdrawn and the prospects for legislative action on this bill are uncertain. Congress could consider other legislation
to repeal or replace certain elements of the ACA. At this time, the full effect that the ACA would have on our business
remains unclear.

In addition, other federal health reform measures have been proposed and adopted in the United States since the ACA was
enacted. For example, as a result of the Budget Control Act of 2011, providers are subject to Medicare payment reductions
of 2% per fiscal year through 2025 unless additional Congressional action is taken.

Further, the American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012 reduced Medicare payments to several providers and increased the
statute of limitations period for the government to recover overpayments from providers from three to five years. More
recently, there has been heightened governmental scrutiny recently over the manner in which manufacturers set prices for
their marketed products, which have resulted in several recent Congressional inquiries and proposed bills designed to,
among other things, bring more transparency to product pricing, review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer
patient programs, reduce the cost of drugs under Medicare and reform government program reimbursement methodologies
for products.

Individual states in the United States have also become increasingly aggressive in passing legislation and implementing
regulations designed to control pharmaceutical and biological product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement
constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and,

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing. In addition, regional
healthcare authorities and individual hospitals are increasingly using bidding procedures to determine what pharmaceutical
products and which suppliers will be included in their prescription drug and other healthcare programs. This measure could
reduce the ultimate demand for our products or put pressure on our product pricing.

Coverage, Reimbursement and Pricing

Significant uncertainty exists as to the coverage and reimbursement status of any products for which we may obtain
regulatory approval. In the United States and markets in other countries, sales of any products for which we receive
regulatory approval for commercial sale will depend, in part, on the availability of coverage and the adequacy of
reimbursement from third-party payors. Third-party payors include government authorities, managed care organizations,
private health insurers and other organizations. The process for determining whether a third-party payor will provide
coverage for a product may be separate from the process for setting the reimbursement rate that the payor will pay for the
product. Third-party payors may limit coverage to specific products on an approved list, or formulary, which might not
include all of the FDA-approved products for a particular indication. Moreover, a third-party payor’s decision to provide
coverage for a product does not imply that an adequate reimbursement rate will be approved. For example, the payor’s
reimbursement payment rate may not be adequate or may require co-payments that patients find unacceptably high.
Additionally, coverage and reimbursement for products can differ significantly from payor to payor. The Medicare and
Medicaid programs increasingly are used as models for how private payors and other governmental payors develop their
coverage and reimbursement policies for drugs and biologics. However, one third-party payor’s decision to cover a
particular product does not ensure that other payors will also provide coverage for the product, or will provide coverage at
an adequate reimbursement rate. Adequate third-party reimbursement may not be available to enable us to maintain price
levels sufficient to realize an appropriate return on our investment in product development. Further, some third-party
payors may require pre-approval of coverage for new or innovative devices or drug therapies before they provide
reimbursement for use of such therapies.

Third-party payors are increasingly challenging the price and examining the medical necessity and cost-effectiveness of
products and services, in addition to their safety and efficacy. To obtain coverage and reimbursement for any product that
might be approved for sale, we may need to conduct expensive pharmacoeconomic studies to demonstrate the medical
necessity and cost-effectiveness of our product. These studies will be in addition to the studies required to obtain regulatory
approvals. If third-party payors do not consider a product to be cost-effective compared to other available therapies, they
may not cover the product after approval as a benefit under their plans or, if they do, the level of payment may not be
sufficient to allow a company to sell its products at a profit. Thus, obtaining and maintaining reimbursement status is time-
consuming and costly.

The U.S. government, state legislatures and foreign governments have shown significant interest in implementing cost
containment programs to limit the growth of government-paid health care costs, including price controls, restrictions on
reimbursement and requirements for substitution of generic products for branded prescription products. By way of
example, the ACA contains provisions that may reduce the profitability of products, including, for example, increased
rebates for products sold to Medicaid programs, extension of Medicaid rebates to Medicaid managed care plans, mandatory
discounts for certain Medicare Part D beneficiaries and annual fees based on pharmaceutical companies’ share of sales to
federal health care programs. CMS may develop new payment and delivery models, such as bundled payment models. For
example, the HHS set a goal of moving 30% of Medicare payments to alternative payment models tied to the quality or
value of services by 2016 and 50% of Medicare payments into these alternative payment models by the end of 2018.
Adoption of government controls and measures, and tightening of restrictive policies in jurisdictions with existing controls
and measures, could limit payments for our products.

In the European Community, governments influence the price of products through their pricing and reimbursement rules
and control of national health care systems that fund a large part of the cost of those products to consumers. Some
jurisdictions operate positive and negative list systems under which products may only be marketed once a reimbursement
price has been agreed to by the government. To obtain reimbursement or pricing approval, some of these countries may
require the completion of clinical trials that compare the cost effectiveness of a particular product candidate to currently
available therapies. Other member states allow companies to fix their own prices for medicines, but monitor and control
company profits. The downward pressure on health care costs in general, particularly prescription products, has become
very intense. As a result, increasingly high barriers are being erected to the entry of new products. In addition, in some
countries, cross border imports from low-priced markets exert a commercial pressure on pricing within a country.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

The marketability of any products for which we receive regulatory approval for commercial sale may suffer if the
government and third-party payors fail to provide adequate coverage and reimbursement. In addition, the focus on cost
containment measures in the United States and other countries has increased and we expect will continue to increase the
pressure on pharmaceutical pricing. Coverage policies and third-party reimbursement rates may change at any time. Even if
we attain favorable coverage and reimbursement status for one or more products for which we receive regulatory approval,
less favorable coverage policies and reimbursement rates may be implemented in the future.

Sales and Marketing

Numerous regulatory authorities in addition to the FDA, including, in the United States, the Centers for Medicare &
Medicaid Services, other divisions of the HHS, the U.S. Department of Justice, and similar foreign, state, and local
government authorities, regulate sales, promotion and other activities following product approval. As described above, the
FDA regulates all advertising and promotion activities for products under its jurisdiction both prior to and after approval.
Only those claims relating to safety and efficacy that the FDA has approved may be used in labeling. Physicians may
prescribe legally available products for uses that are not described in the product’s labeling and that differ from those we
tested and the FDA approved. Such off-label uses are common across medical specialties, and often reflect a physician’s
belief that the off-label use is the best treatment for the patients. The FDA does not regulate the behavior of physicians in
their choice of treatments, but FDA regulations do impose stringent restrictions on manufacturers’ communications
regarding off-label uses. If we do not comply with applicable FDA requirements we may face adverse publicity,
enforcement action by the FDA, corrective advertising, consent decrees and the full range of civil and criminal penalties
available to the FDA. Promotion of off-label uses of products can also implicate the false claims laws described below.

In the United States, clinical research, sales, marketing and scientific/educational programs must also comply with various
federal and state laws pertaining to healthcare “fraud and abuse,” including anti-kickback laws and false claims laws. Anti-
kickback laws including, without limitation, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute that applies to items and services
reimbursable under governmental healthcare programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, make it illegal for a prescription
drug manufacturer to solicit, offer, receive, or pay any remuneration in exchange for, or to induce, the referral of business,
including the purchase or prescription of a particular product. Due to the breadth of the statutory provisions, limited
statutory exceptions and regulatory safe harbors, and the scarcity of guidance in the form of regulations, agency advisory
opinions, sub-regulatory guidance and judicial decisions addressing industry practices, it is possible that our practices
might be challenged under anti-kickback or similar laws. Moreover, recent healthcare reform legislation has strengthened
these laws. For example, the ACA, among other things, amends the intent requirement of the federal Anti-Kickback Statute
and criminal healthcare fraud statutes to clarify that a person or entity does not need to have actual knowledge of this
statute or specific intent to violate it in order to have committed a violation. In addition, the ACA clarifies that the
government may assert that a claim that includes items or services resulting from a violation of the federal Anti-Kickback
Statute constitutes a false or fraudulent claim for purposes of the federal civil False Claims Act. In addition, private
individuals can bring similar actions under the federal civil False Claims Act. False claims laws, including, without
limitation, the federal civil False Claims Act, prohibit anyone from knowingly and willingly presenting, or causing to be
presented for payment, to third-party payors (including Medicare and Medicaid) claims for reimbursed products or services
that are false or fraudulent, claims for items or services not provided as claimed, or claims for medically unnecessary items
or services. Our activities relating to the sale and marketing of our products may be subject to scrutiny under these laws, as
well as civil monetary penalties laws and the criminal healthcare fraud provisions enacted as part of HIPAA. Violations of
fraud and abuse laws may be punishable by criminal and civil sanctions, including fines and civil monetary penalties, the
possibility of exclusion from federal healthcare programs (including Medicare and Medicaid), disgorgement, individual
imprisonment, and corporate integrity agreements, which impose, among other things, rigorous operational and monitoring
requirements on companies. Similar sanctions and penalties, as well as imprisonment, also can be imposed upon executive
officers and employees, including criminal sanctions against executive officers under the so-called “responsible corporate
officer” doctrine, even in situations where the executive officer did not intend to violate the law and was unaware of any
wrongdoing.

Given the significant penalties and fines that can be imposed on companies and individuals if convicted, allegations of such
violations often result in settlements even if the company or individual being investigated admits no wrongdoing.
Settlements often include significant civil sanctions, including fines and civil monetary penalties, and corporate integrity
agreements. If the government were to allege or convict us or our executive officers of violating these laws, our business
could be harmed. Our activities could be subject to challenge for the reasons discussed above and due to the broad scope of
these laws and the increasing attention being given to them by law enforcement authorities. Other healthcare laws that may

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

affect our ability to operate include HIPAA, as amended by HITECH, which governs the conduct of certain electronic
healthcare transactions and protects the security and privacy of protected health information; analogous state laws
governing the privacy and security of health information, some of which are more stringent than HIPAA and many of
which differ from each other in significant ways and may not have the same effect, and the federal Physician Payments
Sunshine Act, which requires certain manufacturers of products, devices, biologics, and medical supplies to report annually
to HHS information related to payments and other transfers of value to physicians and teaching hospitals, and ownership
and investment interests held by physicians and their immediate family members.

Further, there are an increasing number of state laws that affect our business operations. Some states require manufacturers
to make reports to states on pricing and marketing information. Other state laws require pharmaceutical companies to
comply with the pharmaceutical industry’s voluntary compliance guidelines and the relevant compliance guidance
promulgated by the U.S. federal government, or otherwise restrict payments that may be made to healthcare providers and
other potential referral sources. Some states maintain anti-kickback and false claims laws that apply to claims involving
healthcare items or services reimbursed by any third-party payor, including private insurers. We may also be subject to
state laws governing the privacy and security of health information in certain circumstances, many of which differ from
each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by HIPAA, thus complicating compliance efforts. Many of these
state laws contain ambiguities as to what is required to comply with the laws. Given the lack of clarity in laws and their
implementation, our reporting actions could be subject to the penalty provisions of the pertinent state authorities. Ensuring
that our internal operations and future business arrangements with third parties comply with applicable healthcare laws and
regulations could involve substantial costs.

Similar rigid restrictions are imposed on the promotion and marketing of products in the European Union and other
countries. Even in those countries where we may not be directly responsible for the promotion and marketing of our
products, if our potential international distribution partners engage in inappropriate activity it can have adverse implications
for us.

Foreign Regulation

In order to market any product outside of the United States, we would need to comply with numerous and varying
regulatory requirements of other countries and jurisdictions regarding quality, safety and efficacy and governing, among
other things, clinical trials, marketing authorization, commercial sales and distribution of our products. Whether or not we
obtain FDA approval for a product, we would need to obtain the necessary approvals by the comparable foreign regulatory
authorities before we can commence clinical trials or marketing of the product in foreign countries and jurisdictions.
Although many of the issues discussed above with respect to the United States apply similarly in the context of the
European Union, the approval process varies between countries and jurisdictions and can involve additional product testing
and additional administrative review periods. The time required to obtain approval in other countries and jurisdictions
might differ from and be longer than that required to obtain FDA approval. Regulatory approval in one country or
jurisdiction does not ensure regulatory approval in another, but a failure or delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one
country or jurisdiction may negatively impact the regulatory process in others.

The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act

The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or FCPA, prohibits any U.S. individual or business from paying, offering, or
authorizing payment or offering of anything of value, directly or indirectly, to any foreign official, political party, or
candidate for the purpose of influencing any act or decision of the foreign entity in order to assist the individual or business
in obtaining or retaining business. The FCPA also obligates companies whose securities are listed in the United States to
comply with accounting provisions requiring the company to maintain books and records that accurately and fairly reflect
all transactions of the corporation, including international subsidiaries, and to devise and maintain an adequate system of
internal accounting controls for international operations. Activities that violate the FCPA, even if they occur wholly outside
the United States, can result in criminal and civil fines, imprisonment, disgorgement, oversight, and debarment from
government contracts.

European Union—EMA process

In the European Union, products follow a similar demanding process as that we described above for the United States and
the ICH Common Technical Document is the basis for applications.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Business Update

Centralized Procedure

Under the centralized procedure, after the EMA issues an opinion, the European Commission issues a single marketing
authorization valid across the European Union, as well as Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway. The centralized procedure is
compulsory for human products that are: derived from biotechnology processes, such as genetic engineering; contain a new
active substance indicated for the treatment of certain diseases, such as HIV/AIDS, cancer, diabetes, neurodegenerative
disorders or autoimmune diseases and other immune dysfunctions; and officially designated orphan drugs. For products
that do not fall within these categories, an applicant has the option of submitting an application for a centralized marketing
authorization to the EMA as long as the product concerned is a significant therapeutic, scientific or technical innovation, or
if its authorization would be in the interest of public health.

National Authorization Procedures

There are also two other possible routes to authorize medicinal products in several countries, which are available for
products that fall outside the scope of the centralized procedure:

• Decentralized procedure. Using the decentralized procedure, an applicant may apply for simultaneous

authorization in more than one European Union country of a medicinal product that has not yet been authorized
in any European Union country and that does not fall within the mandatory scope of the centralized procedure.

• Mutual recognition procedure. In the mutual recognition procedure, a medicine is first authorized in one

European Union Member State, in accordance with the national procedures of that country. Thereafter, further
marketing authorizations can be sought from other European Union countries in a procedure whereby the
countries concerned agree to recognize the validity of the original, national marketing authorization.

Good Manufacturing Practices

Like the FDA, the EMA, the competent authorities of the European Union Member States and other regulatory agencies
regulate and inspect equipment, facilities and processes used in the manufacturing of products prior to approving a product.
If, after receiving clearance from regulatory agencies, a company makes a material change in manufacturing equipment,
location, or process, additional regulatory review and approval may be required. Once we or our partners commercialize
products, we will be required to comply with cGMP, and product-specific regulations enforced by, the European
Commission, the EMA and the competent authorities of European Union Member States following product approval. Also
like the FDA, the EMA, the competent authorities of the European Union Member States and other regulatory agencies also
conduct regular, periodic visits to re-inspect equipment, facilities, and processes following the initial approval of a product.
If, as a result of these inspections, the regulatory agencies determine that our or our partners’ equipment, facilities, or
processes do not comply with applicable regulations and conditions of product approval, they may seek civil, criminal or
administrative sanctions or remedies against us, including the suspension of our manufacturing operations or the
withdrawal of our product from the market.

Data and Market Exclusivity

Similar to the United States, there is a process to authorize generic versions of innovative products in the European Union.
Generic competitors can submit abridged applications to authorize generic versions of products authorized by EMA
through a centralized procedure referencing the innovator’s data and demonstrating bioequivalence to the reference
product, among other things. New products in the European Union can receive eight years of data exclusivity coupled with
two years of market exclusivity, and a potential one-year extension, if the marketing authorizations holder obtains an
authorization for one or more new therapeutic indications that demonstrates “significant clinical benefit” in comparison
with existing therapies. This system is usually referred to as “8+2”. Abridged applications cannot rely on an innovator’s
data until after expiry of the eight year date exclusivity term, meaning that a competitor can file an application for a generic
product but the product cannot be marketed until the end of the market exclusivity term.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Financial Review

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Financial Review

We are a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on the development and commercialization of novel
therapeutics for serious conditions that compromise a woman’s reproductive health and pregnancy. We are focused on
providing therapeutic solutions for women between the ages of 15 and 49 who suffer from reproductive health conditions
that affect their quality of life, ability to conceive or that complicate pregnancy and the health of newborns. Our goal is to
build the leading women’s reproductive health and pregnancy company focused on conditions where current treatment
options are limited and significant unmet needs exist.

We are developing OBE2109 as a novel, oral GnRH receptor antagonist, for the treatment of pain associated with
endometriosis and heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids in pre-menopausal women. We are currently
conducting a multiple-dose, placebo-controlled Phase 2b clinical trial of OBE2109 in patients with endometriosis, with a
target enrollment of 330 patients. We expect to report data from the first 24-week evaluation period of this trial in the first
half of 2018. For the uterine fibroids indication, we intend to commence a Phase 3 clinical development program with two
Phase 3 clinical trials in the first half of 2017. We expect to report data from these Phase 3 clinical trials in the first half of
2020. We are also developing nolasiban, an oral oxytocin receptor antagonist, to improve clinical pregnancy and live birth
rates in women undergoing IVF. We initiated a European Phase 3 clinical trial in women undergoing IVF in the first half of
2017 and expect to report data for the primary endpoint in the second quarter of 2018. In addition, we are developing
OBE022 an oral and selective prostaglandin F2 receptor antagonist, as a once daily treatment for preterm labor in weeks 24
to 34 of pregnancy. Based on results of Phase 1 clinical trials conducted in February and March 2017, we intend to advance
OBE022 into Phase 2a Proof-of-Concept clinical trial in the second half of 2017 to assess its safety and efficacy to delay
birth in women 24 to 34 weeks pregnant who face preterm labor and potentially preterm delivery.

We were founded in November 2012 and our operations to date have included organizing and staffing our company, raising
capital, in-licensing rights to OBE2109, nolasiban and OBE022 and conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials. To
date, we have not generated any revenue from product sales as none of our product candidates have been approved for
commercialization. We have historically financed our operations exclusively through the sale of equity. To date, we have
raised an aggregate of $180.0 million of gross proceeds, including the proceeds from our initial public offering, and also
acquired license rights on product candidates from the sale of preferred shares.

We have never been profitable and have incurred significant net losses in each period since our inception. Our net losses
were $30.2 million, $19.9 million and $12.8 million for years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. As
of December 31, 2016, we had accumulated losses of $70.2 million, out of which $30.6 million were offset with share
premium. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and operating losses for the foreseeable future. We anticipate
that our expenses will increase significantly in connection with our ongoing activities as we:

•

continue to invest in the clinical development of our product candidates and specifically in connection with our
ongoing Phase 2b clinical trial of OBE2109 for the treatment of endometriosis, our planned Phase 3 clinical
trials of OBE2109 for the treatment of uterine fibroids, our European Phase 3 clinical trial for nolasiban, our
planned Phase 2a Proof-of-Concept clinical trial for OBE022 and any additional clinical trials and nonclinical
studies that we may conduct for product candidates;

• hire additional research and development, and general and administrative personnel;
• maintain, expand and protect our intellectual property portfolio;

•

identify and in-license or acquire additional product candidates; and
continue to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company.

We will need substantial additional funding to support our operating activities as we advance our product candidates
through clinical development, seek regulatory approval and prepare for, and if any of our product candidates are approved,
proceed to commercialization. Adequate funding may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all.
We have no manufacturing facilities, and all of our manufacturing activities are contracted out to third parties.
Additionally, we currently utilize third-party CROs, to carry out our clinical development and trials. We do not yet have a
sales organization.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Financial Review

Strategic Licensing Agreements
OBE2109

In November 2015, we entered into the Kissei license and supply agreement with Kissei. Pursuant to the Kissei license and
supply agreement we received an exclusive license to develop, manufacture and commercialize products, or the Product,
containing the compounds which is a specified GnRH antagonist and covered by certain licensed patent rights, or the
Compound, throughout the world except for specified Asian countries and we arranged to exclusively acquire from Kissei
the material necessary to produce OBE2109.

Nolasiban

In August 2013, we entered into the 2013 license agreement with Merck Serono, pursuant to which we received a
worldwide exclusive license to develop, manufacture and commercialize compounds covered by the licensed patent rights,
including nolasiban. In consideration for the license, we issued 914,069 Series A preferred shares to Merck Serono at the
time of our Series A financing, which had a fair-value of $4.9 million based on an exchange rate of $1.00 for CHF 0.9244
as of the date of the transaction. With respect to any products we commercialize under the 2013 license agreement, we
agreed to pay Merck Serono quarterly royalties based on a high-single-digit percentage of annual net sales of each product,
subject to specified reductions, until the later of the date that all of the patent rights for that product have expired, as
determined on a country-by-country and product-by-product basis, or ten years from the first commercial sale of such
product on a country-by-country and product-by-product basis.

OBE022

In June 2015, we entered into the 2015 license agreement with Merck Serono, which we amended in July 2016, pursuant to
which we received a worldwide exclusive license to develop, manufacture and commercialize compounds covered by the
licensed patent rights, including OBE022. In consideration for the license, we issued 325,000 Series A preferred shares to
Merck Serono in September 2016 upon the initiation of a Phase 1 clinical trial for a licensed product. With respect to any
products we commercialize under the 2015 license agreement, we agreed to pay Merck Serono quarterly royalties based on
a mid-single-digit percentage of annual net sales of each product, subject to specified reductions, until the later of the date
that all of the patent rights for that product have expired, as determined on a country-by-country and product-by-product
basis or ten years from the first commercial sale of such product on a country-by-country and product-by-product basis.

Components of Results of Operations
Revenue

To date, we have not generated any revenue from product sales and do not expect to generate any revenue from product
sales for the foreseeable future.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Financial Review

Other Operating Income

Other operating income mainly relates to consulting services rendered to a third party in 2015 and re-invoicing costs
associated with both our Merck Serono and Kissei Pharmaceutical license agreements in 2016.

Operating Expenses
Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses consist primarily of costs incurred in connection with our research and development
activities and consist mainly of direct research costs, which include: costs associated with the use of CROs and consultants
hired to assist on our research and development activities; personnel expenses, which include salaries, benefits and share-
based compensation expenses for our employees; expenses related to regulatory affairs and intellectual property;
manufacturing costs in connection with conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials; and depreciation expense for
assets used in research and development activities. Research and development costs are generally expensed as incurred.
However, costs for certain activities, such as manufacturing and preclinical studies and clinical trials, are generally
recognized based on an evaluation of the progress to completion of specific tasks using information and data provided to us
by our vendors and collaborators.

We typically use our employee, consultant and infrastructure resources across our development programs. We track
outsourced research and development costs by product candidate or preclinical program, but we do not allocate personnel
costs, other internal costs or external consultant costs to specific product candidates.

From inception through December 31, 2016, we have incurred $54.8 million in research and development expenses to
advance the development of our product candidates. The following table provides a breakdown of our outsourced research
and development expenses that are directly attributable to the specified product candidates for the years ended
December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

OBE2109 .......................................................................... $
Nolasiban ..........................................................................
OBE022 ............................................................................

Year Ended
December 31,

2016
(9,689) $
(2,873)
(4,103)

2015

(188) $

(9,252)
(1,275)

2014

—
(6,983)
(833)

Total outsourced research and development expenses ...... $

(16,665) $

(10,715) $

(7,816)

We expect our research and development expense will increase for the foreseeable future as we seek to advance the
development of our product candidates. At this time, we cannot reasonably estimate or know the nature, timing and
estimated costs of the efforts that will be necessary to complete the development of our product candidates. We are also
unable to predict when, if ever, material net cash inflows will commence from sales of our product candidates. This is due
to the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with developing such product candidates, including:

•

the number of clinical sites included in the trials;
the length of time required to enroll suitable patients;
the number of patients that ultimately participate in the trials;
the number of doses patients receive;
the duration of patient follow-up; and
the results of our clinical trials.

In addition, the probability of success for any of our product candidates will depend on numerous factors, including
competition, manufacturing capability and commercial viability. A change in the outcome of any of these variables with
respect to the development of any of our product candidates would significantly change the costs, timing and viability
associated with the development of that product candidate.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Financial Review

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel expenses, including salaries, benefits and share-based
compensation expense, for personnel in executive, finance, accounting, business development, legal and human resource
functions. General and administrative expense also includes corporate facility costs not otherwise included in research and
development expenses, legal fees related to corporate matters and fees for accounting and consulting services.

We anticipate that our general and administrative expense will increase in the future to support continued research and
development activities. We also anticipate that we will incur increased accounting, audit, legal, regulatory, compliance and
director and officer insurance costs, as well as investor and public relations expenses, associated with operating as a public
company.

Finance Result, Net

Finance result, net, consists mainly of interest income and expense on our cash and cash equivalents and foreign exchange
gains and losses.

Taxation

We are subject to corporate taxation in Switzerland. In 2015, the Canton of Geneva granted us a ten year tax holiday for all
income and capital taxes on a communal and cantonal level commencing in fiscal year 2013 and valid through to 2022,
subject to our Swiss domiciliation and the compliance with certain reporting provisions.

We are also entitled under Swiss laws to carry forward any losses incurred for a period of seven years and can offset our
losses carried forward against future taxes. As of December 31, 2016, we had tax loss carryforwards totaling $57.0 million.
We do not believe it is probable that we will generate sufficient profits to avail ourselves of these tax loss carryforwards.

A. Operating Results
Analysis of Results of Operations
The following table sets forth our selected consolidated statements of operations data for the periods indicated:

Year Ended
December 31,

2016

2015

2014

(in thousands)

Consolidated Statement of Operations Data:
Other operating income .................................................... $

22 $

17 $

Operating expenses:

Research and development expenses ......................
General and administrative expenses .....................

Total operating expenses ...............................
Finance result, net ............................................................

(23,711)
(6,452)

(30,163)
(61)

(16,892)
(2,954)

(19,846)
(38)

(11,402)
(1,560)

(12,962)
109

Net loss ............................................................................ $

(30,202) $

(19,867) $

(12,808)

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Financial Review

Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
Operating Expenses
Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses by product candidate

OBE2109 ..................................................................... $
Nolasiban .....................................................................
OBE022 .......................................................................

Unallocated expenses

Staff costs ....................................................................
Other research and development costs ........................

Year Ended
December 31,

2016

2015

(in thousands)
(unaudited)

(9,689)
(2,873)
(4,103)

(5,520)
(1,526)

(188)
(9,252)
(1,275)

(5,367)
(810)

Total research and development expenses ............................ $

(23,711)

(16,892)

Research and development expenses increased by $6.8 million in 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to the increased
costs of $9.7 million resulting from the initiation of the clinical activities for OBE2109, including primarily the Phase 2b
clinical trial in endometriosis, and increased costs of $2.8 million resulting from the initiation of our Phase 1 clinical trials
with OBE022, which were partially offset by decreased costs of $6.4 million resulting from the completion of the Phase 2
clinical trials of nolasiban.

General and Administrative Expenses

Year Ended
December 31,

2016

2015

(in thousands)
(unaudited)

Staff costs ............................................................................. $
Professional fees ..................................................................
Other general and administrative costs ................................

(1,916)
(3,959)
(577)

(1,946)
(690)
(318)

Total general and administrative expenses ........................... $

(6,452)

(2,954)

General and administrative expenses increased by $3.5 million in 2016 compared to 2015 primarily due to an increase of
$3.3 million in professional fees mainly due to legal, audit, accounting and printing fees associated with our initial public
offering.

Finance Result, Net

Finance result, net ....................................................... $

(61)

(38)

Finance result, net, in 2016 and 2015 primarily consisted of foreign exchange losses.

Year Ended
December 31,

2016

2015

(in thousands)

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Financial Review

Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014
Operating Expenses
Research and Development Expenses

Research and development expenses by product candidate

Unallocated expenses

Staff costs ....................................................................
Other research and development costs ........................

Year Ended
December 31,

2015

2014

(in thousands)
(unaudited)

(188)
(9,252)
(1,275)

(5,367)
(810)

—
(6,983)
(833)

(2,989)
(597)

Total research and development expenses ............................ $

(16,892)

(11,402)

Research and development expenses increased by $5.5 million in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to a $2.3 million
increase in the costs of outsourced research and development activities primarily attributable to the two Phase 2 clinical
trials for nolasiban and a $2.4 million increase in employee salaries, related benefits and share-based compensation costs
associated with an increased headcount.
General and Administrative Expenses

Year Ended
December 31,

2015

2014

(in thousands)
(unaudited)

(1,946)
(690)
(318)

(933)
(367)
(260)

Total general and administrative expenses ........................... $

(2,954)

(1,560)

General and administrative expenses increased by $1.4 million in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to costs associated
with an increase in employee salaries, related benefits and share-based compensation costs associated with an increased
headcount, as well as our Series B financing and the Kissei license and supply agreement.

Finance Result, Net

Year Ended
December 31,

2015

2014

(in thousands)

Finance result, net ....................................................... $

(38)

109

Finance result, net decreased by $0.1 million in 2015 compared to 2014 primarily due to foreign exchange losses realized
on our cash and cash equivalents.

B. Liquidity and Capital Resources

Since our inception, we have not generated any revenue and have incurred net losses and negative cash flows from our
operations. We have funded our operations primarily through the sale of equity. From inception through December 31,
2016, we have raised an aggregate of $93.2 million of gross proceeds from the sale of preferred shares. As of December 31,
2016, we had $25.5 million in cash and cash equivalents. In January 2017, we completed our initial public offering of

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Financial Review

6,450,000 common shares at a public offering price of $15.00 per share. We received $90.0 million in net proceeds after
deducting $6.8 million of underwriting discounts and commissions, excluding approximately $3.2 million in offering
expenses. As a result, our cash on hand increased by approximately $86.8 million, resulting in a total liquidity position of
$112.3 million following the completion of our initial public offering.

Our primary uses of cash are to fund operating expenses, primarily research and development expenditures. Cash used to
fund operating expenses is impacted by the timing of when we pay these expenses, as reflected in the change in our
outstanding accounts payable and accrued expenses. We currently have no ongoing material financing commitments, such
as lines of credit or guarantees.

We expect our expenses to increase in connection with our ongoing activities, particularly as we continue the research and
development of, continue or initiate clinical trials of, and seek marketing approval for, our product candidates. In addition,
if we obtain marketing approval for any of our product candidates, we expect to incur significant commercialization
expenses related to program sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution to the extent that such sales, marketing and
distribution are not the responsibility of potential collaborators. Furthermore, we expect to continue to incur additional
costs associated with operating as a public company. Accordingly, we will need to obtain substantial additional funding in
connection with our continuing operations. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on attractive terms, we would
be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our research and development programs or future commercialization efforts.

We expect our existing cash and cash equivalents will enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditure
requirements into the first quarter of 2019. We have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and
we could utilize our available capital resources sooner than we currently expect. Our future capital requirements will
depend on many factors, including:

•

the scope, progress, results and costs of our ongoing and planned preclinical studies and clinical trials for
OBE2109, nolasiban and OBE022;

the timing and amount of milestone and royalty payments we are required to make under our license
agreements;
the extent to which we in-license or acquire other product candidates and technologies;
the number and development requirements of other product candidates that we may pursue;

the costs, timing and outcome of regulatory review of our product candidates;
the costs associated with building out our U.S. operations;

the costs and timing of future commercialization activities, including drug manufacturing, marketing, sales and
distribution, for any of our product candidates for which we receive marketing approval;

the revenue, if any, received from commercial sales of our product candidates for which we receive marketing
approval;

• our ability to establish strategic collaborations; and

•

the costs and timing of preparing, filing and prosecuting patent applications, maintaining and enforcing our
intellectual property rights and defending any intellectual property-related claims.

Identifying potential product candidates and conducting preclinical studies and clinical trials is a time-consuming,
expensive and uncertain process that takes many years to complete, and we may never generate the necessary data or
results required to obtain marketing approval and achieve product sales. In addition, our product candidates, if approved,
may not achieve commercial success. Our revenue, if any, will be derived from sales of products that we do not expect to
be commercially available for many years, if at all.

Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenue, we may finance our cash needs through a
combination of equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations, strategic alliances and licensing arrangements. To the
extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, your ownership interest will
be diluted, and the terms of any additional securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect your
rights as a shareholder. Debt financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting
our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Financial Review

If we raise funds through additional collaborations, strategic alliances or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may
have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams, research programs or product candidates or
to grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt
financings when needed, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our product development or future
commercialization efforts or grant rights to develop and market product candidates that we would otherwise prefer to
develop and market ourselves.

The following table shows a summary of our cash flows for the periods indicated:

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period ........ $
Net cash used in operating activities .............................
Net cash used in investing activities .............................
Net cash (used in) / from financing activities ...............
Effect of exchange rates ................................................

Year Ended
December 31,

2016
54,275
(28,589)
(45)
(167)
34

2015

4,008
(13,911)
(10,050)
74,404
(176)

2014
16,293
(12,124)
(101)
427
(487)

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period................... $

25,508

54,275

4,008

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities consists of net loss before tax adjusted for changes in net working capital, that is
current assets less current liabilities, and for non-cash items such as depreciation and amortization, and the value of share-
based services.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, operating activities used $28.6 million of cash, primarily as the result of our net
loss before tax of $30.2 million, as adjusted for non-cash items and changes in the net working capital. Non-cash items
amounted to $2.0 million and mainly consisted of share-based payments. Changes in the net working capital included
primarily a $2.0 million increase in prepaid expenses, mainly due to upfront payments made in relation with our Phase 3
clinical trials in uterine fibroids, as well as a $1.8 million increase in other payables and current liabilities mainly due to our
ongoing Phase 2 clinical trial of OBE2109 in endometriosis and Phase 1 clinical trials of OBE022 as of December 31,
2016.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, operating activities used $13.9 million of cash, primarily as the result of our net
loss before tax of $19.9 million, as adjusted for non-cash items and changes in the net working capital. Non-cash items
amounted to $3.4 million and primarily consisted of share-based payments and the issuance of anti-dilution common shares
during our Series B financing in November 2015. Changes in the net working capital included a $2.1 million increase in
accrued expenses, primarily due to the stamp duty due on the proceeds from the Series B financing, as well as to accrued
staff costs, including annual bonuses, and our ongoing clinical trials as of December 31, 2015.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, operating activities used $12.1 million of cash, primarily as the result of our net
loss before tax of $12.8 million, as adjusted for non-cash items and changes in the net working capital. Non-cash items
amounted to $0.4 million and mainly consisted of share-based payments. Changes in the net working capital included
mainly a $1.1 million increase in accrued expenses, mainly due to staff costs accrued, including annual bonuses, and our
ongoing clinical trials as of December 31, 2014.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities consists primarily of investments in leasehold improvements and furniture and fixtures,
as well as investments in intangible assets through the execution of in-licensing agreements.

Net cash used in investing activities in the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2014, were primarily used to
purchase furniture and fixtures for our offices in Switzerland. Net cash used in investing activities in 2015 mainly consisted
of the upfront payment made to Kissei under the Kissei license and supply agreement.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Financial Review

Financing Activities
Net cash from financing activities consists primarily of proceeds from the sale of equity securities.

Cash flows used in financing activities in 2016 mainly consisted of payments of costs incurred in connection with our
initial public offering and related issuance of new shares. Cash flows from financing activities in 2015 and 2014 mainly
consisted of the proceeds from the Series B financing and payments received for the second tranche of the Series A
financing.

C. Research and Development

For a discussion of our research and development activities, see the Business Overview section and the item “A. Operating
Results” of this Financial Review section.

D. Trend Information

For a discussion of trends, see item “A. Operating Results” and “B. Liquidity and Capital Resources” of this Financial
Review section.

E. Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
During the periods presented, we did not have, and we do not currently have, any off-balance sheet arrangements.

F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations at December 31, 2016:

Operating leases ........................................................................... $

243 $

(in thousands)
— $

121 $

— $

364

Total ................................................................................... $

243 $

121 $

— $

364

Less than
1 Year

1 to 3
Years

3 to 5
Years

More than
5 Years

Total

Under our license agreements with Kissei and Merck Serono, we may be required to pay royalties in the future. In addition,
pursuant to the Kissei license and supply agreement, we have agreed to make aggregate milestone payments of up to
$63.0 million upon the achievement of specified developmental milestones, such as the initiation of clinical trials and
receipt of regulatory approvals. With respect to any product we commercialize under the Kissei license and supply
agreement, we have agreed to make additional aggregate milestone payments of up to $125.0 million to Kissei upon the
achievement of specified commercial milestones. We have not included any contingent payment obligations, such as
milestone payments and royalties, in the table above as the amount, timing and likelihood of such payments are not known.

We enter into contracts in the normal course of business with CROs for clinical trials, preclinical studies, manufacturing
and other services and products for operating purposes. These contracts generally provide for termination upon notice, and
therefore we believe that our non-cancelable obligations under these agreements are not material.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Corporate Governance

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Corporate Governance

1 - Information on the Company.

Our legal and commercial name is ObsEva SA. We are a Swiss stock corporation (société anonyme) organized under the
laws of Switzerland. We were formed in 2012 with an indefinite duration. We are currently registered in Plan-les-Ouates,
Geneva, Switzerland. Our principal executive offices are located at Chemin des Aulx, 12, 1228 Plan-les-Ouates, Geneva,
Switzerland. Our telephone number is +41 22 552 38 40. Investors should contact us for any inquiries through the address
and telephone number of our principal executive office. We maintain a web site at www.obseva.com. The reference to our
website is an inactive textual reference only and the information contained in, or that can be accessed through, our web site
is not a part of this Annual Report.

2 - Organizational Structure.
The following diagram illustrates our corporate structure:

3 - Directors, Senior Management and Employees.
A. Directors and Senior Management.

The following table sets forth information regarding our executive officers and directors, including their ages, as of
December 31, 2016. Our directors are appointed for one-year terms, which expire on the occasion of each annual general
meeting. Accordingly, the terms of the directors set forth below will expire on our first annual general meeting as a public
company in 2017.

Name

Executive Officers:
Ernest Loumaye
Jean-Pierre Gotteland
Elke Bestel
Timothy Adams
Fabien Lefebvre de Ladonchamps
Ben T.G. Tan
Non-Employee Directors:
Frank Verwiel
Annette Clancy
Barbara Duncan
James I. Healy
Ed Mathers
Rafaèle Tordjman
Jacky Vonderscher

Age

Position(s)

64 Chief Executive Officer and Director
52 Chief Scientific Officer
50 Chief Medical Officer and Head of Pharmacovigilance
57 Chief Financial Officer
38 Vice President of Finance
57 Vice President of Commercial & Business Development

54 Chairperson of the Board of Directors
62 Director
52 Director
51 Director
56 Director
47 Director
62 Director

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Corporate Governance

Unless otherwise indicated, the current business addresses for our executive officers and directors is: Chemin des Aulx, 12,
1228 Plan-les-Ouates, Geneva, Switzerland.

Executive Officers

Ernest Loumaye is a co-founder of our company and has served as our Chief Executive Officer since our inception in
November 2012. Previously, Dr. Loumaye co-founded PregLem SA, a Swiss specialty biopharmaceutical company, and
served as its Chief Executive Officer from 2006 until October 2012. Dr. Loumaye currently serves as the chairman of the
board of directors of GenKyoTex S.A., a private Swiss pharmaceutical company. Dr. Loumaye holds a M.D. and a Ph.D.
from Louvain University, with a specialization in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Our board of directors believes that
Dr. Loumaye’s leadership of our company since its inception and experience with biopharmaceutical companies prior to
founding our company provide him with the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.

Jean-Pierre Gotteland has served as our Chief Scientific Officer since September 2015. From May 2007 to August 2015,
Dr. Gotteland worked at PregLem SA, initially as the Vice President of Non-Clinical Development and CMC from 2007 to
2012 and as the Chief Development Officer from January 2012 to August 2015. From 1998 to 2007, Dr. Gotteland held
several research and development positions at Serono (subsequently Merck Serono). From 1991 to 1998, Dr. Gotteland
served as medicinal chemistry group leader at Pierre Pabre Meclicament. Dr. Gotteland holds a Ph.D. in Organic Chemistry
from the University Claude Bernard and an Engineering Diploma from Ecole Superieure de Chimie Industrielle.

Elke Bestel has served as our Chief Medical Officer and Head of Pharmacovigilance since September 2015. Prior to joining
our company, Dr. Bestel worked at PregLem SA, initially as a Global Project Director from 2008 to 2009, then as the Vice
President Clinical Operations from 2009 to August 2012 and finally as the Chief Medical Officer from September 2012 to
August 2015. Dr. Bestel studied at the Georg-August University Medical School of Göttingen, Germany and the Ludwig-
Maximilian University Medical School of Munich, Germany. Dr. Bestel holds an M.D. from the University of Göttingen.

Timothy Adams has served as our Chief Financial Officer since January 2017. From June 2014 to September 2016,
Mr. Adams served as the Chief Financial Officer of Demandware, Inc. Mr. Adams served as Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of athenahealth, Inc. from January 2010 to June 2014. Previously, Mr. Adams served as Chief
Investment Officer of Constitution Medical Investors, Inc., a private investment firm focused on health-care-sector-related
acquisitions and investments, as well as Senior Vice President of Corporate Strategy for Keystone Dental, Inc., a provider
of dental health products and solutions. Earlier in his career, Mr. Adams was Chief Financial Officer at a number of other
publicly traded companies. Mr. Adams began his career in public accounting at PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, formerly
Price Waterhouse, and is a Certified Public Accountant. Mr. Adams has served as a member of the board of directors of
ABILITY Network, a private healthcare technology company, since November 2014. Mr. Adams has served as a member
of the board of directors of Model N, a public revenue management solutions company, since December 2016. Mr. Adams
obtained a B.S. from Murray State University and an M.B.A. from Boston University.

Fabien Lefebvre de Ladonchamps has served as our Vice President of Finance since January 2016 and previously served as
our Finance Director from October 2013 to December 2015. Prior to joining our company, Mr. de Ladonchamps worked at
Addex Therapeutics, initially as Chief Accountant from 2008 to 2009 and then as Group Financial Controller from 2010 to
September 2013. Mr. de Ladonchamps holds a French degree in Finance and Accounting from the Lyon III University in
Lyon, France.

Ben T.G. Tan has served as our Vice President of Commercial & Business Development since September 2014. Prior to
joining our company, Mr. Tan worked at Evolva SA, as Director, Business Development Pharmaceuticals from April 2012
to March 2014. Prior to joining Evolva SA, Mr. Tan worked at Novartis as Global Program Strategic Director,
Cardiovascular and Metabolic Diseases from 2008 to 2011. Prior to joining Novartis, Mr. Tan worked at Speedel as Head
of Business Development & Licensing from 2001 to 2008. Prior to joining Speedel, Mr. Tan worked at Devgen, as
Executive Vice President of Business from 2000 to 2001. Prior to joining Devgen, Mr. Tan worked at Organon, as Global
Head of Licensing from 1997 to 2000. Prior to joining Organon, Mr. Tan worked at Roche, as Global Business
Leader/International Product Manager from 1994 to 1997, and at Roche Netherlands, as Head of Medical Marketing from
1990 to 1993. Mr. Tan holds an M.S. from the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Corporate Governance

Non-Employee Directors

Frank Verwiel has served as a member of our board of directors since March 2016 and has served as the chairperson of the
board since December 2016. Dr. Verwiel was the President and Chief Executive Officer of Aptalis Pharma Inc. from 2005
to 2014, where he also served on the board of directors. He currently serves as a member of the board of directors of the
public companies Achillion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a pharmaceutical company, Avexis, Inc., a biotechnology company, and
Bavarian Nordic A/S, a biotechnology company. Dr. Verwiel previously served on the board of directors of InterMune, Inc.
from 2012 to 2014. Dr. Verwiel was also a director of the Biotechnology Industry Organisation. Dr. Verwiel received his
M.D. from Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, and his M.B.A. from INSEAD in Fontainebleau, France. Our
board of directors believes that Dr. Verwiel’s scientific acumen and his over 25 years of strategic, operational and
international experience in the pharmaceutical industry provide him with the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.

Annette Clancy has served as a member of our board of directors since November 2013 and served as our chairperson from
November 2013 to December 2016. Since 2009, Ms. Clancy has been a senior advisor at Frazier Healthcare Ventures, a
U.S.-based healthcare venture capital firm. Prior to joining Frazier Healthcare Ventures, Ms. Clancy held various positions
at GlaxoSmithKline, a global healthcare company. Ms. Clancy is currently on the board of directors of Swedish Orphan
Biovitrum AB, a public biopharmaceutical company, as well as several private companies. Ms. Clancy holds a B.Sc. in
Pharmacology from Bath University and a series of American Management Association diplomas in finance and marketing.
Our board of directors believes that Ms. Clancy’s over 30 years of experience in the pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical
industries provide her with the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.

Barbara Duncan has served as a member of our board of directors since December 2016. From May 2009 through June
2016, Ms. Duncan served as the Chief Financial Officer of Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a biopharmaceutical company.
Prior to joining Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ms. Duncan served as the Chief Financial Officer and then Chief Executive
Officer of DOV Pharmaceutical, Inc., or DOV, from 2001 to April 2009. Prior to joining DOV, Ms. Duncan served as a
vice president of Lehman Brothers Inc. in its corporate finance division from August 1998 to August 2001. From
September 1994 to August 1998, Ms. Duncan was an associate and director at SBC Warburg Dillon Read, Inc. in its
corporate finance group. Ms. Duncan serves on the board of directors of Aevi Genomic Medicines, Inc., a
biopharmaceutical company, and Adaptimmune Therapeutics plc, a biopharmaceutical company, and Innoviva, Inc., a
biopharmaceutical company, as well as two private companies. Ms. Duncan received her B.S. from Louisiana State
University in 1985 and her M.B.A. from the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, in 1994. Our board of directors
believes that Ms. Duncan’s expertise with public and financial accounting matters, as well as her experience in the
pharmaceutical industry, provide her with the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.

James I. Healy has served as a member of our board of directors since August 2013. Dr. Healy has been a General Partner
of Sofinnova Ventures, a venture capital firm, since June 2000. Prior to June 2000, Dr. Healy held various positions at
Sanderling Ventures, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals (as successor to Miles Laboratories) and ISTA Pharmaceuticals,
Inc. Dr. Healy is currently on the board of directors of the public companies Ascendis Pharma A/S, a clinical-stage
pharmaceutical company, Auris Medical Holding AG, a biopharmaceutical company, Coherus BioSciences, Inc., a
biologics platform company, Amarin Corporation PLC, a biopharmaceutical company, Edge Therapeutics, Inc., a
biotechnology company, and Natera, Inc., a genetic testing company, as well as several private companies. Previously, he
served as a board member of InterMune, Inc., Anthera Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Durata Therapeutics, Inc., CoTherix, Inc.,
Hyperion Therapeutics, Inc. and KaloBios Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dr. Healy was nominated to our board of directors by
Sofinnova Ventures. Dr. Healy holds an M.D. and a Ph.D. in Immunology from the Stanford School of Medicine and holds
a B.A. in Molecular Biology and a B.A. in Scandinavian Studies from the University of California at Berkeley. Our board
of directors believes that Dr. Healy’s experience in the pharmaceutical industry and investing in life sciences companies, as
well as his medical and scientific background, provide him with the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.

Ed Mathers has served as a member of our board of directors since February 2016. Since August 2008, Mr. Mathers has
been a Partner at New Enterprise Associates, Inc., or NEA, a private venture capital firm focusing on technology and
healthcare investments. Mr. Mathers serves on the board of directors of Envisia Therapeutics, Inc., a biopharmaceutical
company, Liquidia Technologies, a biotechnology company, Ra Pharmaceuticals, Inc., a pharmaceutical company, Rhythm
Pharmaceuticals, a pharmaceutical company, Lumos Pharma, a biotechnology company, Mirna Therapeutics, Inc., a
pharmaceutical company, as well as several private companies. From 2002 to 2008, Mr. Mathers served as Executive Vice
President, Corporate Development and Venture at MedImmune, Inc., or MedImmune, and led its venture capital subsidiary,
MedImmune Ventures, Inc. Before joining MedImmune in 2002, he was Vice President, Marketing and Corporate
Licensing and Acquisitions at Inhale Therapeutic Systems. Previously, Mr. Mathers spent 15 years at Glaxo Wellcome, Inc.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Corporate Governance

where he held various sales and marketing positions. Mr. Mathers was nominated to our board of directors by NEA.
Mr. Mathers holds a B.S. in Chemistry from North Carolina State University. Our board of directors believes that
Mr. Mathers’s experience with the healthcare and pharmaceutical industries and his broad management experience provide
him with the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.

Rafaèle Tordjman has served as a member of our board of directors since August 2013. Dr. Tordjman joined the French
venture capital firm Sofinnova Partners in 2001 and is a Managing Partner specializing in life sciences investments.
Dr. Tordjman serves on the board of directors of the public company Ascendis Pharma A/S, a clinical-stage pharmaceutical
company. Dr. Tordjman has also served on the boards of directors at several life sciences companies including, DBV
Technologies SA, a French publicly traded company specializing in allergy therapies, Flexion Therapeutics, Inc., a publicly
traded company specializing in clinical-stage pharmaceuticals, as well as a private company, and Preglem, a company that
specialized in reproductive female medicine. Previously, Dr. Tordjman was a research scientist at the Institut National de la
Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) in Cochin Hospital, Paris, France. Dr. Tordjman has also practiced as a
medical doctor, specializing in clinical hematology and internal medicine. Dr. Tordjman was nominated to our board of
directors by Sofinnova Partners. Dr. Tordjman received an M.D. and completed a fellowship in hematology and internal
medicine at the Paris University Hospitals. She received a Ph.D. in hematopoiesis and angiogenesis from and completed a
post-doctoral fellowship in immunology at the University of Paris VII. Our board of directors believes that Dr. Tordjman’s
experience in the pharmaceutical industry and investing in life sciences companies, as well as her medical and scientific
background, provide her with the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.

Jacky Vonderscher has served as a member of our board of directors since October 2013. Since September 2013,
Dr. Vonderscher has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Vonderscher & Co GmbH, a consultancy company, and since
January 2014, Dr. Vonderscher has served as the President of ENYO Pharma, a biopharmaceutical company.
Dr. Vonderscher has also served as the Chief Executive Officer of ENYO Pharma since July 2016. Prior to joining ENYO
Pharma, Dr. Vonderscher served as a Senior Vice President of Hoffmann-La-Roche Ltd from 2008 to December 2013.
From 1979 to 2008, Dr. Vonderscher held a variety of senior positions at Novartis Pharma AG. Dr. Vonderscher also
serves on the boards of directors of several private companies. Dr. Vonderscher holds an engineering degree in Biological
Chemistry from the National Institute of Applied Sciences (INSA-Lyon, France) and a Ph.D. in Biochemistry from the
University of Geneva. Our board of directors believes that Dr. Vonderscher’s experience in the pharmaceutical industry, as
well as his scientific background, provide him with the qualifications and skills to serve as a director.

Family Relationships
There are no family relationships among any of our executive officers or directors.

B. Compensation.
Compensation of Executive Officers and Directors

For the year ended December 31, 2016, the aggregate compensation paid to the members of our board of directors and our
executive officers for services in all capacities was $9.0 million.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, other than the non-voting share incentive plan outline below, we had no
performance based compensation programs.

The amount set aside by us to provide pension, retirement or similar benefits to members of our board of directors or
executive officers amounted to a total of $0.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2016.

Non-Voting Share Incentive Plan

On November 26, 2013, we adopted an incentive plan, or the Plan, under which, subject to the approval of our board of
directors, we may grant awards of restricted non-voting shares to eligible participants. The material terms of our Plan are
set forth below.

All of our employees, advisors, including scientific consultants, agents and members of our board of directors are eligible
to participate in our Plan. As of December 31, 2016, there were 1,854,502 issued and outstanding non-voting shares

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Corporate Governance

awarded under our Plan. All outstanding non-voting shares were converted into common shares immediately prior to the
closing of our initial public offering. Under our Plan, non-voting shares are issued to participants and registered in their
name. Each non-voting share has a par value of CHF 0.0769 per share, which the participant must pay, in respect of the
aggregate number of shares underlying the non-voting share award. Non-voting shares held by participants are subject to a
four-year vesting period, or as otherwise set out in the participant’s issuance agreement. Under the Plan, one-fourth of the
non-voting shares would vest upon the first anniversary of the issuance date, and one-36th of the remaining non-voting
shares would vest, starting from the first anniversary of the issuance date, over a total period of three years. Upon a
termination of employment, certain forfeiture provisions may apply to a participant’s vested or unvested non-voting shares.

2017 Equity Incentive Plan

Following the completion of our initial public offering, we ceased issuing any new grants under our Plan and plan to issue
any new awards under our 2017 equity incentive plan, or our 2017 Plan. No awards have been granted under our 2017 Plan.
Our 2017 Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the U.S. Internal
Revenue Code, or the Code, to our employees and our parent and subsidiary corporations’ employees, and for the grant of
nonstatutory stock options, restricted stock awards, restricted stock unit awards, stock appreciation rights, performance
stock awards and other forms of stock compensation to our employees, including officers, consultants and directors. Our
2017 Plan also provides for the grant of performance cash awards to our employees, consultants and directors.

Authorized Shares

The maximum number of our common shares that may be issued under our 2017 Plan is 4,172,623 shares. The maximum
number of common shares that may be issued pursuant to the exercise of incentive stock options under our 2017 Plan is
8,300,000 shares.

The maximum number of our common shares subject to stock awards granted under our 2017 Plan or otherwise during any
one fiscal year to any non-employee director, taken together with any cash fees paid to the director during the fiscal year,
will not exceed $645,000 in total value.

Shares issued under our 2017 Plan may be authorized but unissued or reacquired shares. Shares subject to stock awards
granted under our 2017 Plan that expire or terminate without being exercised in full, or that are paid out in cash rather than
in shares, will not reduce the number of shares available for issuance under our 2017 Plan. Additionally, shares issued
pursuant to stock awards under our 2017 Plan that we repurchase or that are forfeited, as well as shares reacquired by us as
consideration for the exercise or purchase price of a stock award or to satisfy tax withholding obligations related to a stock
award, will become available for future grant under our 2017 Plan.

Administration

Our board of directors, or a duly authorized committee thereof, has the authority to administer our 2017 Plan. Our board of
directors has delegated its authority to administer our 2017 Plan to our compensation, nominating and corporate
governance committee under the terms of the compensation, nominating and corporate governance committee’s charter.
Subject to the terms of our 2017 Plan, our board of directors may also delegate to one or more of our officers the authority
to (1) designate employees other than officers to receive specified stock awards and (2) determine the number of common
shares to be subject to such stock awards. Subject to the terms of our 2017 Plan, the administrator has the authority to
determine the terms of awards, including recipients, the exercise price or strike price of stock awards, if any, the number of
shares subject to each stock award, the fair market value of one common share, the vesting schedule applicable to the
awards, together with any vesting acceleration, the form of consideration, if any, payable upon exercise or settlement of the
stock award and the terms and conditions of the award agreements for use under our 2017 Plan.

The administrator has the power to modify outstanding awards under our 2017 Plan. Subject to the terms of our 2017 Plan,
the administrator has the authority to reprice any outstanding option or stock appreciation right, cancel and re-grant any
outstanding option or stock appreciation right in exchange for new stock awards, cash or other consideration, or take any
other action that is treated as a repricing under generally accepted accounting principles, with the consent of any adversely
affected participant.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Corporate Governance

Section 162(m) Limits

No participant may be granted stock awards covering more than 1,500,000 of our common shares under our 2017 Plan
during any calendar year pursuant to stock options, stock appreciation rights and other stock awards whose value is
determined by reference to an increase over an exercise price or strike price of at least 100% of the fair market value of our
common shares on the date of grant. Additionally, no participant may be granted in a calendar year a performance stock
award covering more than 1,500,000 of our common shares or a performance cash award having a maximum value in
excess of $10,000,000 under our 2017 Plan. These limitations enable us to grant awards that will be exempt from the
$1,000,000 limitation on the income tax deductibility of compensation paid per covered executive officer imposed by
Section 162(m) of the Code.

Performance Awards

Our 2017 Plan permits the grant of performance-based stock and cash awards that may qualify as performance-based
compensation that is not subject to the $1,000,000 limitation on the income tax deductibility of compensation paid per
covered executive officer imposed by Section 162(m) of the Code. To enable us to grant performance-based awards that
will qualify, our compensation, nominating and corporate governance committee can structure such awards so that the
stock or cash will be issued or paid pursuant to such award only following the achievement of specified pre-established
performance goals during a designated performance period.

Corporate Transactions

Our 2017 Plan provides that in the event of a specified corporate transaction, including without limitation a consolidation,
merger, or similar transaction involving our company, the sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the
consolidated assets of our company and our subsidiaries, or a sale or disposition of more than 50% of the outstanding
capital stock of our company, each stock award will terminate and be cancelled to the extent not vested or exercised prior to
the effective time of the specified corporate transaction, unless the administrator elects to take one or more of the following
actions with respect to such stock award:

arrange for the assumption, continuation or substitution of a stock award by a successor corporation;
arrange for the assignment of any reacquisition or repurchase rights held by us to a successor corporation;

accelerate the vesting of the stock award and provide for its termination prior to the effective time of the
corporate transaction;

cancel the stock award to the extent not vested or not exercised prior to the effective time of the corporate
transaction, in exchange for such cash consideration or no consideration as the administrator, in its sole
discretion, may consider appropriate;
arrange for the lapse, in whole or in part, of any reacquisition or repurchase right held by us; or

cancel the stock award prior to the transaction in exchange for a cash payment, which may be reduced by the
exercise price payable in connection with the stock award.

•

The administrator is not obligated to treat all stock awards or portions of stock awards, even those that are of the same type,
in the same manner. The administrator may take different actions with respect to the vested and unvested portions of a
stock award.

Change in Control

The administrator may provide, in an individual award agreement or in any other written agreement between us and the
participant, that the stock award will be subject to additional acceleration of vesting and exercisability in the event of a
termination of the participant’s continuous service after a change in control. In the absence of such a provision, no such
acceleration of the stock award will occur.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Corporate Governance

Plan Amendment or Termination

Our board of directors has the authority to amend, suspend, or terminate our 2017 Plan, provided that such action does not
materially impair the existing rights of any participant without such participant’s written consent. No incentive stock
options may be granted after the tenth anniversary of the date our 2017 Plan was adopted by our board of directors.

C. Board Practices.

Our board of directors is composed of eight members. Each director is elected for a one-year term. The current members of
our board of directors were appointed at an extraordinary shareholders’ meeting held on December 6, 2016 to serve until
our first annual general meeting as a public company in 2017.

We are a foreign private issuer. As a result, in accordance with the NASDAQ listing requirements, we may rely on home
country governance requirements and certain exemptions thereunder rather than relying on the stock exchange corporate
governance requirements. However, our board of directors has undertaken a review of the independence of the directors
and determined that, under current NASDAQ listing requirements, Frank Verwiel, Annette Clancy, Barbara Duncan, James
I. Healy, Ed Mathers, Rafaèle Tordjman and Jacky Vonderscher, representing seven of our eight directors, are
“independent directors.” In making such determination, our board of directors considered whether any director has a
material relationship with us that could compromise their ability to exercise independent judgment in carrying out their
responsibilities. For an overview of our corporate governance principles, see “Item 10.B—Memorandum and Articles of
Association.”

Board Committees

Our board of directors has established an audit committee and a compensation, nominating and corporate governance
committee.

Audit Committee

The audit committee, which consists of Barbara Duncan, Ed Mathers and Frank Verwiel, assists our board of directors in
overseeing our accounting and financial reporting processes and the audits of our financial statements. In addition, the audit
committee is directly responsible for the compensation, retention and oversight of the work of our independent registered
public accounting firm and statutory auditors who are appointed by the shareholders pursuant to Swiss corporation law.
Ms. Duncan serves as chairman of the committee. The audit committee consists exclusively of members of our board of
directors who are financially literate, and Ms. Duncan is considered an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. Our board of directors has determined that Ms. Duncan, Mr. Mathers
and Dr. Verwiel satisfy the “independence” requirements set forth in Rule 10A-3 under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act
of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act.

The audit committee is governed by a charter that complies with NASDAQ listing rules. The audit committee is
responsible for, among other things:

•

recommending an auditor for submission to the shareholders;

the compensation, retention and oversight of any auditor or accounting firm engaged for the purpose of
preparing or issuing an audit report or performing other audit, review or attest services;

pre-approving the audit services and non-audit services to be provided by our independent auditor before the
auditor is engaged to render such services;

reviewing and discussing with the independent auditor its responsibilities under generally accepted auditing
standards, the planned scope and timing of the independent auditor’s annual audit plan(s) and significant
findings from the audit;

obtaining and reviewing a report from the independent auditor describing all relationships between the
independent auditor and us consistent with the applicable Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
requirements regarding the independent auditor’s communications with the audit committee concerning
independence;

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Corporate Governance

•

confirming and evaluating the rotation of the audit partners on the audit engagement team as required by law;

reviewing with management and the independent auditor, in separate meetings whenever the audit committee
deems appropriate, any analyses or other written communications prepared by the management or the
independent auditor setting forth significant financial reporting issues and judgments made in connection with
the preparation of the financial statements, including analyses of the effects of alternative IFRS methods on the
financial statements, and our other critical accounting policies and practices;

reviewing, in conjunction with our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, our disclosure controls
and procedures;

establishing procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment of complaints received by us regarding
accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters, and the confidential, anonymous submission by
our employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters; and

•

approving or ratifying any related party transaction (as defined in our related party transaction policy) in
accordance with our related party transaction policy.

The audit committee meets as often as it determines is appropriate to carry out its responsibilities, but in any event will
meet at least four times per year.

Compensation, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

Our compensation, nominating and corporate governance committee consists of three members, Annette Clancy, Rafaèle
Tordjman and James I. Healy. Our board of directors has determined that each of Ms. Clancy and Drs. Tordjman and Healy
are independent under the NASDAQ listing standards, are “non-employee directors” as defined in Rule 16b-3 promulgated
under the Exchange Act and are “outside directors” as that term is defined in Section 162(m) of the U.S. Internal Revenue
Code of 1986, as amended, or Section 162(m). The chair of our compensation, nominating and corporate governance
committee is Ms. Clancy. The primary purpose of our compensation, nominating and corporate governance committee is to
discharge our board of directors’ responsibilities to oversee our compensation policies, plans and programs and to review
and determine the compensation to be paid to our executive officers, directors and other senior management, as appropriate.
We are subject to the Swiss Ordinance against excessive compensation in listed stock corporations, known as the “Minder”
rules. As a result of the Minder rules, the members of the compensation, nominating and corporate governance committee
must be elected by our shareholders and the aggregate compensation of our board of directors and executive officers must
also be approved by our shareholders.

In addition, this committee is also responsible for director nominations as well as reviewing and making recommendations
to the board, if required, on our corporate governance framework and guidelines.

The compensation, nominating and corporate governance committee has the responsibility to, among other things:

•

review and approve, or recommend that our board of directors approve, the compensation of our executive
officers based on the aggregate compensation approved by our shareholders;

review and recommend to our board of directors the compensation of our directors based on the aggregate
compensation approved by our shareholders;

review and approve, or recommend that our board of directors approve, the terms of compensatory
arrangements with our executive officers;
administer our share and equity incentive plans;

select independent compensation consultants and assess whether there are any conflicts of interest with any of
the committees’ compensation advisers;

review and approve, or recommend that our board of directors approve, incentive compensation and equity
plans, and any other compensatory arrangements for our executive officers and other senior management, as
appropriate;

review and establish general policies relating to compensation and benefits of our employees and reviewing our
overall compensation philosophy;

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Corporate Governance

•

identify, evaluate and select, or recommend that our board of directors approve, nominees for election to our
board of directors;
evaluate the performance of our board of directors and of individual directors;

consider and make recommendations to our board of directors regarding the composition of the committees of
the board of directors;
review developments in corporate governance practices;
evaluate the adequacy of our corporate governance practices and reporting;
review management succession plans;

approve any loans by the company to executive officers (to the extent permitted by applicable law and our
articles of association) and loans by the company to employees that are not executive officers, where the
amount of any such loan exceeds $10,000;

• develop and make recommendations to our board of directors regarding corporate governance guidelines and

matters; and

• oversee periodic evaluations of the board of directors’ performance.

Other Corporate Governance Matters

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as related rules subsequently implemented by the SEC, requires foreign private
issuers, including our company, to comply with various corporate governance practices. In addition, NASDAQ rules
provide that foreign private issuers may follow home country practice in lieu of the NASDAQ corporate governance
standards, subject to certain exceptions and except to the extent that such exemptions would be contrary to U.S. federal
securities laws.

Because we are a foreign private issuer, our members of our board of directors, executive board members and senior
management are not subject to short-swing profit and insider trading reporting obligations under Section 16 of the U.S.
Exchange Act. They will, however, be subject to the obligations to report changes in share ownership under Section 13 of
the U.S. Exchange Act and related SEC rules.

D. Employees.

As of December 31, 2016, we had 27 employees. None of our employees are represented by any collective bargaining
agreements. We believe that we maintain good relations with our employees. At each date shown, we had the following
number of employees, broken out by department and geography.

As of December 31,

2016

2015

2014

Function
Research and preclinical development ......................................
Clinical, medical and regulatory affairs .....................................
Management and administrative ................................................

Total ..........................................................................................

8
11
8

6
10
5

Geography
Switzerland ................................................................................

4
7
4

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Corporate Governance

4 - Share Ownership.

The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common shares as of
December 31, 2016 for each beneficial owner of 5% or more of our outstanding common shares; each of our directors and
executive officers; and all of our directors and executive officers as a group.

Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC. These rules generally attribute beneficial
ownership of securities to persons who possess sole or shared voting power or investment power with respect to those
securities and include common shares issuable upon the exercise of options that are immediately exercisable or exercisable
within 60 days of December 31, 2016. Percentage ownership calculations are based on 23,181,262 common shares
outstanding as of December 31, 2016. Such share number does not include the 6,450,000 common shares that were sold in
connection with our initial public offering in January 2017. Further, the percentage ownership calculations and other
information in the table does not reflect any purchases by our existing 5% shareholders and their affiliated entities in
connection with our initial public offering.

Except as otherwise indicated, all of the shares reflected in the table are common shares and all persons listed below have
sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned by them, subject to applicable community
property laws. The information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose.

In computing the number of common shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person,
we deemed outstanding common shares subject to options held by that person that are immediately exercisable or
exercisable within 60 days of December 31, 2016. We did not deem these shares outstanding, however, for the purpose of
computing the percentage ownership of any other person. Beneficial ownership representing less than 1% is denoted with
an asterisk (*).

Except as otherwise indicated in the table below, addresses of the directors, executive officers and named beneficial owners
are in care of ObsEva SA, Chemin des Aulx, 12, 1228 Plan-les-Ouates, Geneva, Switzerland.

Name of Beneficial Owner

Principal Shareholders:

Fund Sofinnova Capital VII(1) ......................................
Sofinnova Venture Partners VIII, L.P.(2) ......................
Novo A/S(3) ..................................................................
Ares Trading S.A.(4) .....................................................
New Enterprise Associates 15, L.P.(5) ..........................
HBM Healthcare Investments (Cayman) Ltd(6) ............
Orbimed Private Investments V, LP(7) .........................

Executive Officers and Directors:

Ernest Loumaye(8) ........................................................
Jean-Pierre Gotteland ..................................................
Elke Bestel ...................................................................
Timothy Adams ...........................................................
Fabien Lefebvre de Ladonchamps ...............................
Ben T.G. Tan ...............................................................
Barbara Duncan ...........................................................
Annette Clancy ............................................................
James I. Healy(2) ...........................................................
Ed Mathers(5) ................................................................
Rafaèle Tordjman(1) ......................................................
Frank Verwiel ..............................................................
Jacky Vonderscher .......................................................
All current directors and executive officers as a group

Number

Percentage

3,849,274
3,011,957
2,710,760
1,837,303
2,769,897
1,846,598
1,846,598

3,107,299
*
*
—
*
*
—
*
3,011,957
2,769,897
3,849,274
*
*

16.6%
13.0
11.7
7.9
11.9
8.0
8.0

13.4
*
*
—
*
*
—
*
13.0
11.9
16.6
*
*

(13 persons)(9) ..........................................................

13,473,577

58.1%

Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1%.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Corporate Governance

(1) Consists of 3,849,274 common shares issuable upon conversion of preferred shares held by Fund Sofinnova Capital

VII. Sofinnova Partners SAS, a French corporation and the management company of Fund Sofinnova Capital VII,
may be deemed to have sole voting and dispositive power over the shares held by Fund Sofinnova Capital VII. The
managing partners of Sofinnova Partners SAS, Denis Lucquin, Antoine Papiernik, Rafaèle Tordjman, M.D., Ph.D. (a
member of our board of directors) and Monique Saulnier, may be deemed to have shared voting and dispositive
power with respect to such shares. The address of Fund Sofinnova Capital VII is Sofinnova Partners, Immeuble le
Centorial, 16-18 Rue du Quatre-Septembre, 75002 Paris, France.

(2) Consists of 3,011,957 common shares issuable upon conversion of preferred shares held by Sofinnova Venture

Partners VIII, L.P., or Sofinnova VIII. Sofinnova Management VIII, L.L.C. is the general partner of Sofinnova VIII,
and Anand Mehra, M.D., James Healy, M.D. (a member of our board of directors) and Michael Powell, Ph.D., the
managing members of Sofinnova Management VIII, L.L.C., may be deemed to have shared voting and dispositive
power with respect to such shares. The address of Sofinnova VIII is c/o Sofinnova Ventures, Inc., 3000 Sand Hill
Road, Bldg. 4, Suite 250, Menlo Park, California 94025.

(3) Consists of 2,710,760 common shares issuable upon conversion of preferred shares held by Novo A/S, a Danish

limited liability company that manages investments and financial assets. The board of directors of Novo A/S, which
is currently comprised of Sten Scheibye, Göran Ando, Jeppe Christiansen, Steen Riisgaard and Per Wold-Olsen, has
shared voting and dispositive power with respect to these shares and may exercise such control only with the support
of a majority of the board. As such, no individual member of the board is deemed to hold any beneficial ownership of
these shares. Dr. Lüneborg, a member of our board of directors, is employed as a principal of Novo A/S and is not
deemed to be a beneficial owner of these shares. The address of Novo A/S is Tuborg Havnevej 19, 2900 Hellerup,
Denmark.

(4) Consists of 1,837,303 common shares issuable upon conversion of preferred shares held by Ares Trading S.A. Ares
Trading S.A. is the wholly owned subsidiary of Merck Serono S.A., which is the wholly owned subsidiary of Merck
KGaA. By virtue of such relationships, Merck Serono S.A. and Merck KGaA may be deemed to have shared voting
and dispositive power with respect to the shares held by Ares Trading S.A. The address of Ares Trading S.A. is Zone
Industrielle de l’Ouriettaz, 1170 Aubonne, Switzerland.

(5) Consists of 2,769,897 common shares issuable upon conversion of preferred shares held by New Enterprise

Associates 15, L.P., or NEA 15. The shares directly held by NEA 15 are indirectly held by NEA Partners 15, L.P., or
NEA Partners 15, the sole general partner of NEA 15, NEA 15 GP, LLC, or NEA 15 LLC, the sole general partner of
NEA Partner 15 and each of the individual Managers of NEA 15 LLC. The individual Managers of NEA 15 LLC, or
collectively, the NEA 15 Managers, are Peter J. Barris, Forest Baskett, Anthony A. Florence, Jr., Kristna “Kittu ”
Kolluri, David M. Mott, Jon Sakoda, Scott D. Sandell, Peter Sonsini Ravi Viswanathan and Harry R. Weller. NEA
15, NEA Partners 15, NEA 15 LLC and the NEA 15 Managers share voting and dispositive power with regard to our
securities directly held by NEA 15. Ed Mathers, a partner of New Enterprise Associates, Inc., is a member of our
board of directors. The address of New Enterprise Associates 15, L.P. is c/o New Enterprise Associates, Inc., 1954
Greenspring Drive, Suite 600, Timonium, Maryland 21093.

(6) Consists of 1,846,598 common shares issuable upon conversion of preferred shares held by HBM Healthcare

Investments (Cayman) Ltd. The board of directors of HBM Healthcare Investments (Cayman) Ltd. has sole voting
and dispositive power with respect to the shares. The board of directors of HBM Healthcare Investments (Cayman)
Ltd. is comprised of Jean-Marc Lesieur, Richard Coles, Sophia Harris, Dr. Andrea Wicki and Paul Woodhouse, none
of whom has individual voting or dispositive power with respect to the shares. The address of HBM Healthcare
Investments (Cayman) Ltd is Governor’s Square, Suite 4-212-2, 23 Lime Tree Bay Avenue, West Bay, Grand
Cayman, Cayman Islands.

(7) Consists of 1,846,598 common shares issuable upon conversion of preferred shares held by Orbimed Private

Investments V, LP, or OPI V. OrbiMed Capital GP V LLC, or GP V, is the sole general partner of OPI V, and
OrbiMed Advisors LLC, or Advisors, a registered adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended, is
the sole managing member of GP V. Samuel D. Isaly is the managing member of, and holder of a controlling interest
in Advisors. By virtue of such relationships, GP V, Advisors and Mr. Isaly may be deemed to have voting and
investment power with respect to the shares held by OPI V and as a result may be deemed to have beneficial
ownership of such shares. The address of OPI V is 601 Lexington Avenue, 54th floor, New York, New York 10022.

(8) Consists of 2,085,434 common shares, 500,305 common shares issuable upon conversion of preferred shares and

521,560 common shares issuable upon conversion of non-voting shares. Of the non-voting shares, 338,299 non-
voting shares were subject to a right of repurchase in our favor within 60 days of December 31, 2016 upon the
occurrence of certain events.

(9) Consists of 2,085,434 common shares, 10,131,433 common shares issuable upon conversion of preferred shares and

1,256,710 common shares issuable upon conversion of non-voting shares. Of the non-voting shares, 855,218 non-

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Corporate Governance

voting shares were subject to a right of repurchase in our favor within 60 days of December 31, 2016 upon the
occurrence of certain events.

We have experienced significant changes in the percentage ownership held by major shareholders as a result of our initial
public offering. Prior to our initial public offering in January 2017, our principal shareholders were Fund Sofinnova Capital
VII (16.6%), Sofinnova Venture Partners VIII, L.P. (13.0%), Novo A/S (11.7%), Ares Trading S.A. (7.9%), New
Enterprise Associates 15, L.P. (11.9%), HBM Healthcare Investments (Cayman) Ltd (8.0%) and Orbimed Private
Investments V, LP (8.0%).

In January 2017, we completed our initial public offering and listed our common shares on the Nasdaq Global Select
Market. In the initial public offering, we issued and sold 6,450,000 common shares. Upon the completion of our initial
public offering, 29,631,262 common shares were outstanding. While none of our existing shareholders sold common shares
in the initial public offering, the percentage ownership held by certain shareholders decreased as a result of the issuance of
the common shares sold by us in the initial public offering.

As of December 31, 2016, we estimate that approximately 36.4% of our outstanding common shares were held in the
United States by seven holders of record. The actual number of holders is greater than these numbers of record holders, and
includes beneficial owners whose common shares are held in street name by brokers and other nominees. This number of
holders of record also does not include holders whose shares may be held in trust by other entities.

5 - Controls and Procedures.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer),

after evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange
Act) as of December 31, 2016, have concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective
and ensured that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)
and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer), to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

This Annual Report does not include a report of management’s assessment regarding internal control over financial

reporting due to a transition period established by rules of the SEC for newly public companies.

Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm due to a transition

period established by rules of the SEC for newly public companies.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange
Act) that occurred during the period covered by this Annual Report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.

Conduct of a Risk Assessment

The Company conducts risk management processes to identify and mitigate risks at an early stage. The responsibility

for risk assessment and management is allocated to the Chief Executive Officer, to members of the Executive Committee
and to other specialized corporate functions such as Group Finance. Financial risk management is described in more details
in note 3 to the Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Corporate Governance

6 - Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

PricewaterhouseCoopers SA, or PWC, has served as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2016 and 2015.
Our accountants billed the following fees to us for professional services in each of those fiscal years:

Audit Fees ......................................................................... $
Audit-Related Fees ............................................................
Tax Fees ............................................................................
Other Fees .........................................................................

Total .................................................................................. $

December 31,

2016

2015

(in thousands)

1,010 $
248
10
186

1,454 $

13
—
—
—

“Audit Fees” consist of fees billed for the annual audit of our consolidated financial statements, and the statutory audit of
our consolidated and stand-alone financial statements. Audit Fees also include services that only our independent external
auditor can reasonably provide, such as the review of documents filed with the U.S. stock exchange.

“Audit-Related Fees” consist of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance
of the audit or review of its financial statements or that are traditionally performed by the external auditor, and mainly
include services such as comfort letters issued in connection with securities offerings, due diligence and agreed-upon or
expanded audit procedures.

“Tax Fees” consist of tax consultations, such as advice in connection with employees’ taxation arising from share-based
compensation.
“Other Fees” consist of advisory services relating to the adoption of IFRS.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements
for the year ended December 31, 2016

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016

Consolidated Balance Sheet

(in USD ’000)

As at December 31,

Notes

2016

2015

ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents...………………..
Other receivables………………………….
Prepaid expenses and deferred costs………
Total current assets……………………...

Non-current assets
Plant and equipment………………………
Intangible assets…………………………..
Other long-term assets……………………
Total non-current assets………………...

Total assets………………………………

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities
Other payables and current liabilities……
Accrued expenses…………………………
Total current liabilities………………….

Non-current liabilities
Post-employment obligations….…………
Total non-current liabilities…………….

Shareholders’ equity
Share capital………………………………
Share premium…..………………………..
Reserves………..…………………………
Accumulated losses………………………..
Total shareholders’ equity……………...

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity

4
5
6

7
8
9

11
11
11
11

25,508
783
2,415
28,706

121
16,608
90
16,819

45,525

2,383
4,269
6,652

2,832
2,832

1,740
71,966
1,934
(39,599)
36,041

45,525

54,275
69
174
54,518

124
16,857
91
17,072

71,590

595
3,657
4,252

2,663
2,663

1,694
99,597
2,821
(39,437)
64,675

71,590

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016

(in USD ’000, except per share data)

Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Loss

Other operating income…………………..

OPERATING EXPENSES
Research and development expenses………
General and administrative expenses………

Total operating expenses………………..

OPERATING LOSS…………………….

Finance income ……………….…………...
Finance expense…………….…………......

NET LOSS BEFORE TAX……………..

Income tax expense……………………….

NET LOSS FOR THE YEAR…………..

Net loss per share
Basic………………………………………
Diluted…………………………………….

Year ended December 31,

Notes

2016

2015

2014

13
13

15
15

17
17

(23,711)
(6,452)

(30,163)

(16,892)
(2,954)

(19,846)

(11,402)
(1,560)

(12,962)

(30,141)

(19,829)

(12,917)

36
(97)

-
(38)

109
-

(30,202)

(19,867)

(12,808)

(30,202)

(19,867)

(12,808)

(1.40)
(1.40)

(1.87)
(1.87)

(1.41)
(1.41)

OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Items that will not be reclassified to profit and loss
Remeasurements on post-employment benefit plans……

Items that may be reclassified to profit or loss
Currency translation differences…………………………
TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS…………

(599)

(1,356)

(923)

(83)
(682)

(128)
(1,484)

(983)
(1,906)

TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE LOSS FOR THE YEAR

(30,884)

(21,351)

(14,714)

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

(in USD ’000)

NET LOSS BEFORE TAX FOR THE YEAR
Adjustments for:
Depreciation ………………...……………………………...
Post-employment cost / (benefit)…………………………...
Share-based payments………………………………………
Finance expense, net………………………………………..

(Increase) / decrease in other receivables…………………..
(Increase) / decrease in prepaid expenses, deferred costs and
other long term-assets…………………………………..
Increase in other payables and current liabilities…………...
Increase in accrued expenses……………………………….

NET CASH FLOWS USED IN OPERATING
ACTIVITIES………………………………………………

Payments for plant and equipment………………………….
Acquisition of a license...…………………………………...
NET CASH FLOWS USED IN INVESTING
ACTIVITIES………………………………………………

Proceeds from issues of shares and other equity securities…
Payment of share issuance costs……………………………
Payment of deferred costs of financing activities…………..
Interests paid………………………………………………..
Interests received……………………………………………
NET CASH FLOWS (USED IN) / FROM FINANCING
ACTIVITIES………………………………………………

Year ended December 31,

Notes

2016

2015

2014

(30,202)

(19,867)

(12,808)

7
8

46
(384)
2,237
61

(714)

(2,033)
1,788
612

36
57
3,268
38

273
155
2,125

20
(78)
537
(109)

(21)

(443)
(341)
1,119

(28,589)

(13,911)

(12,124)

(45)
-

(45)

46
(33)
(206)
(8)
34

(167)

(50)
(10,000)

(10,050)

75,836
(1,433)
-
-
1

74,404

(101)
-

(101)

423
-
-
-
4

427

Net (decrease) / increase in cash and cash equivalents..........

(28,801)

50,443

(11,798)

Cash and cash equivalents as at January 1,……………...
Effects of exchange rate changes on cash and cash
equivalents…………………………………………………..
Cash and cash equivalents as at December 31,…………..

54,275

25,508

4,008

(176)

54,275

16,293

(487)

4,008

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity

Notes

Share
capital

Share
premium

Share-
based
payments
reserve

Foreign
currency
translation
reserve

Total
reserves

Accumulated
losses

751

22,499

269

764

915

410

346

23,255

(346)

537

460

77,286

(2,378)

(1,433)

489

(489)

2,366

3,268

3,227

675

(675)

2,366

(2,366)

(33)

2,237

(30,639)

1,694

99,597

705

(983)

(278)

(128)

(406)

(83)

974

(983)

(346)

537

182

(128)

(2,378)

(489)

2,366

3,268

2,821

(83)

(675)

(2,366)

2,237

(4,483)

(12,808)

(923)

(13,731)

(18,214)

(19,867)

(1,356)

(21,223)

(39,437)

(30,202)

(599)

Total

19,741

(12,808)

(1,906)

(14,714)

410

537

5,987

(19,867)

(1,484)

(21,351)

75,823

(1,433)

2,366

3,268

64,675

(30,202)

(682)

(33)

2,237

(30,801)

(30,884)

(in USD ’000)

December 31, 2013

Loss for the year

Other comprehensive loss

Total comprehensive loss

Capital contribution

Issuance of non-voting shares

Share-based remuneration

December 31, 2014

Loss for the year

Other comprehensive loss

Total comprehensive loss

Capital contribution

Share issuance costs

Issuance of non-voting shares

Acquisition of license

Share-based remuneration

December 31, 2015

Loss for the year

Other comprehensive loss

Total comprehensive loss

Issuance of non-voting shares

Acquisition of license

Share issuance costs

Share-based remuneration

Offset of accumulated losses
with share premium

December 31, 2016

1,740

71,966

2,423

(489)

1,934

(39,599)

36,041

30,639

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

1. General information

ObsEva SA (the “Company”) was founded on November 14, 2012, and its address is 12 Chemin des Aulx, 1228 Plan-les-
Ouates, Geneva, Switzerland. The terms “ObsEva” or “the Group” refer to ObsEva SA together with its subsidiaries included
in the scope of consolidation (note 2.2).

The Group is focused on the development and commercialization of novel therapeutics for serious conditions that
compromise women’s reproductive health and pregnancy. The Group has a portfolio of three mid- to late-stage development
in-licensed compounds (OBE2109, OBE001 (“nolasiban”) and OBE022) developed in four indications. The Group has no
currently marketed products.

The consolidated financial statements are presented in dollars of the United States (USD), rounded to the nearest thousand,
except share and per share data, and have been prepared on the basis of the accounting principles described in note 2.

The consolidated financial statements were authorized for issue by the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board of
Directors”) on April 19, 2017.

2. Accounting principles applied in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements

2.1 Basis of preparation

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the International Financial Reporting
Standards (“IFRS”) as published by the International Accounting Standards Board (“IASB”). The consolidated financial
statements are based on a historical cost basis.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates. It
also requires management to exercise its judgement in the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies. The areas
involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the
consolidated financial statements, are disclosed in note 2.5.

Due to rounding, numbers presented throughout these consolidated financial statements may not add up precisely to the
totals provided. All ratios and variances are calculated using the underlying amount rather than the presented rounded
amount.

2.2 Scope of consolidation

Subsidiaries are all entities over which the Group has control. The Group controls an entity when the Group is exposed to, or
has rights to, variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power
to direct the activities of the entity. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from the date on which control is transferred to the
Group. They are deconsolidated from the date that control ceases.

The Company currently consolidates the financial operations of its two fully-owned subsidiaries, ObsEva Ireland Ltd,
which is registered in Cork, Ireland and organized under the laws of Ireland, and ObsEva USA Inc., which is registered and
organized under the laws of Delaware, USA. Both ObsEva Ireland Ltd and ObsEva USA Inc. had no operations and no
results of operations to report as of December 31, 2016.

2.3 Standards and interpretations published by the IASB

The IASB and the International Financing Reporting Standards Interpretations Committee have recently issued new standards
and interpretations to be applied to the Group’s consolidated financial statements.

No new standards were applied to the Group’s consolidated financial statements in 2016.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016

In 2018, the Group expects to adopt the following new relevant standards:

IFRS 9

Financial Instruments

In July 2014, the IASB issued IFRS 9 Financial Instruments which replaces International Accounting Standard (“IAS”) 39
Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. The new standard will change the classification and measurement
requirements of financial assets and financial liabilities and the general hedge accounting rules. The Group is in the process
of evaluating the impact IFRS 9 may have on its consolidated financial statements.

In 2019, the Group expects to adopt the following new relevant standards:

IFRS 16

Leases

In January 2016, the IASB issued IFRS 16 Leases, which replaces IAS 17 Leases and related interpretations. The new
standard will require lessees to recognize a lease liability reflecting future lease payments and a right-of-use asset for
virtually all lease contracts. The Group is in the process of evaluating the impact IFRS 16 may have on its consolidated
financial statements.

Other new standards and amendments published but not yet effective will have no material impact on the consolidated
financial statements of the Group.

2.4 Significant accounting policies

Current assets

Other receivables and other current receivables or prepayments are carried at their nominal value.

Individual receivables that are known to be uncollectible are written off by reducing the carrying amount directly. The Group
considers that there is evidence of impairment if any of the following indicators are present:

•

significant financial difficulties of the debtor;

probability that the debtor will enter bankruptcy or financial reorganization; and

default or delinquency in payments (more than 30 days overdue).

Receivables for which an impairment provision was recognized are written off against the provision when there is no
expectation of recovering additional cash.

Plant and Equipment

Plant and equipment are carried at cost less depreciation and impairment. Historical cost includes expenditure that is directly
attributable to the acquisition of the items. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method, on the basis of the
following useful lives:

•

furniture

hardware

leasehold improvement

5 years

3 years

5 years

Plant and equipment are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying
amount may not be recoverable, on an individual basis. An impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the asset's
carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount.

The assets’ residual values and useful lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at the end of each reporting period.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016

Intangible assets

Separately acquired patents, licenses and other intangible assets are recorded at historical cost and subsequently measured
at cost less accumulated amortization and any impairment losses.

The acquisition of certain intangible assets, mainly licenses, may involve additional payments contingent on the occurrence
of specific events or milestones. Unless the Group already has a present obligation to make the payment at a future date, the
initial measurement of the intangible asset does not include such contingent payments. Instead, such payments are
subsequently capitalised as intangible assets when the contingency or milestone occurs.

Estimated useful life is the lower of legal duration and economic useful life, which does not exceed 20 years. The estimated
useful life of the intangible assets is annually reviewed, and if necessary, the future amortization charge is accelerated.
For licenses, the amortization starts when the assets become available for use, generally once proper regulatory and
marketing approval are obtained.

Intangible assets are subject to impairment testing whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount may not be recoverable. Intangible assets for which amortization has not commenced are subject to impairment
testing at least annually.

Post-employment benefits

All employees of the Company participate in a retirement defined benefit plan. A defined benefit plan is a pension plan that
defines an amount of pension benefit that an employee will receive on retirement, usually dependent on one or more factors
such as age, years of service and compensation. The liability recognized in the balance sheet in respect of defined benefit
pension plans is the present value of the defined benefit obligation at the end of the reporting period less the fair value of plan
assets. The defined benefit obligation is calculated annually by an independent actuary, using the projected unit credit method.
The present value of the defined benefit obligation is determined by discounting the estimated future cash outflows using
interest rates of high-quality corporate bonds that are denominated in the currency in which the benefits will be paid, and that
have terms to maturity approximating to the terms of the related pension obligation.
Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions are charged or credited
to equity in other comprehensive income in the period in which they arise. Past-service costs are recognized immediately in
the consolidated statement of comprehensive loss.

Equity

Incremental costs directly attributable to the issuance of common shares and options are recognized as a deduction from
equity, net of any tax effects.

Treasury shares (equity instruments of the Company held by the Group) are accounted for as a reduction of equity at
acquisition cost and are not subsequently re-measured. When shares are sold out of treasury shares, the resulting profit or
loss is recognized in equity, net of tax.

Research and development

Research expenses are charged to the consolidated statement of comprehensive loss as incurred. Development expenses are
capitalized as intangible assets when it is probable that future economic benefits will flow to the Group, and the following
criteria are fulfilled:

•

it is technically feasible to complete the intangible asset so that it will be available for use or sale;

• management intends to complete the intangible asset and use or sell it;

•

there is an ability to use or sell the intangible asset;

adequate technical, financial and other resources to complete the development and to use or sell the intangible asset
are available; and

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016

•

the expenditure attributable to the intangible asset during its development can be reliably measured.

In the opinion of management, due to uncertainties inherent in the development of the Group’s product candidates, the
criteria for development costs to be recognized as an asset as defined by IAS 38 Intangible Assets are not met.

Foreign currencies

Functional and presentation currency

Items included in the consolidated financial statements of the Group and its subsidiary are measured using the currency of
the primary economic environment in which the entity operates (the "functional currency"). The functional currency of the
Company is Swiss francs (CHF).

The consolidated financial statements are presented in USD, which is the presentation currency of the Group.

Transactions and balances

Foreign currency transactions are translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates at the dates of the
transactions. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation of
monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at year end exchange rates are generally recognized in profit
or loss.

Foreign exchange gains and losses that relate to borrowings are presented in the consolidated statement of comprehensive
loss, within finance costs. All other foreign exchange gains and losses are presented in the consolidated statement of
comprehensive loss on a net basis within other income or other expenses.

Translation into the presentation currency

The results and financial position of operations that have a functional currency different from the presentation currency are
translated into the presentation currency as follows:

•

assets and liabilities are translated at the exchange rate prevailing on December 31 of each year;

income and expenses are translated at average exchange rates (unless this is not a reasonable approximation of the
cumulative effect of the rates prevailing on the transaction dates, in which case income and expenses are translated
at the dates of the transactions); and

•

all resulting exchange differences are recognized in other comprehensive income.

The following rates have been used for the translation from the functional currency to the presentation currency:

Income statement
Average rate (CHF)

Balance sheet

Closing rate as of December 31, (CHF)

USD

2016
0.9850

2015
0.9624

2014
0.9151

2016
1.0160

2015
1.0010

2014
0.9894

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016

Share-based compensation

A share-based, equity-settled, plan (the “Plan”) was formally set-up by the Group in 2013. Participants eligible for awards
under the Plan are executives, directors, employees, agents and consultants. The fair value of the shares granted is
determined at each grant date by using either an option pricing method that uses a Black-Scholes model or a hybrid
method, as appropriate, both based on a combination of the discounted cash flow method, under the income approach, and
the backsolve method. When the equity instruments granted do not vest until the counterparty completes a specified period
of services, the Group accounts for those services as they are rendered by the counterparty, during the vesting period, with
a corresponding increase in equity.

Deferred income taxes

Deferred income tax is provided in full, using the liability method, on temporary differences arising between the tax bases
of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts in the consolidated financial statements. However, if the deferred
income tax arises from initial recognition of an asset or liability in a transaction other than a business combination that at
the time of the transaction affects neither accounting nor taxable profit and loss, it is not accounted for. Deferred income
tax is determined using tax rates and laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date and are
expected to apply when the related deferred income tax asset is realized or the deferred income tax liability is settled.
Deferred income tax assets are recognized to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against
which the temporary differences can be utilized.

Leases

Leases of assets under which all the risks and rewards of ownership are effectively retained by the lessor are classified as
operating leases, and payments made are charged to the statement of comprehensive loss on a straight-line basis.

Segment information

The Group operates in one segment, which is the research, development of innovative women’s reproductive, health and
pregnancy therapeutics. The marketing and commercialization of such therapeutics depend on the success of the clinical
development phase. The Chief Executive Officer of the Company reviews the consolidated statement of operations of the
Group on an aggregated basis and manages the operations of the Group as a single operating segment.

The Group currently generates no revenue from the sales of therapeutics products.

The long lived assets of the Group are all held in Switzerland.

2.5 Critical accounting estimates and judgments

Estimates and judgments are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including
expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.

Critical accounting estimates and assumptions

The Group makes estimates and assumptions concerning the future. The resulting accounting estimates will not necessarily
equal to related actual outcome. The following areas involve a higher degree of judgement or complexity or are areas where
assumptions and estimates can have a significant impact on the consolidated financial statements:

• Post-employment obligations: the actuarial valuation involves making assumptions about discount rates, future
salary increases, mortality rates and future pension increases. Due to the long-term nature of these plans, such
estimates are subject to significant uncertainty (note 10);

• Share-based compensation: the determination of the fair value of the shares granted involves the use of certain

assumptions subject to judgement (note 18);

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016

• Commencement of depreciation and amortization: the depreciation and amortization starts when the assets are

available for use in the manner intended by management, which requires judgement (notes 7 and 8);

• Research and development costs: the Group recognizes expenditure incurred in carrying out its research and
development activities until it becomes probable that future economic benefits will flow to the Group, which
results in recognizing such costs as intangible assets, involving a certain degree of judgement (notes 8 and 13);

• Deferred taxes: the recognition of deferred tax assets requires assessment of whether it is probable that sufficient

future taxable profit will be available against which the deferred tax assets can be utilized (note 16);

•

Impairment of assets: as part of impairment tests, the recoverable amounts of tested assets have been determined
based on fair value calculations requiring the use of certain assumptions, subject to judgement (note 8);

• Preferred shares: the classification of preferred as equity or debt is based on an assessment of the terms and

conditions of such shares, involving a certain degree of judgement (note 11); and

• Going concern: the assessment of whether there is significant doubt on the Group’s ability to continue as a going

concern requires a certain degree of judgement (note 21).

3. Financial risk management

3.1 Financial risk factors

The Group’s activities expose it to a variety of financial risks such as foreign exchange risk, credit risk, interest rate risk
and liquidity risk. The Group’s overall risk management program focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and
seeks to minimize potential adverse effects on the Group’s financial performance. Financial risk management is carried out
by the Group`s finance department subject to and pursuing policies approved by the Board of Directors.

Foreign exchange risk

The Group operates internationally and is exposed to foreign exchange risk arising from various currency exposures,
primarily with respect to the U.S. dollar (USD), Euro (EUR) and British Pound (GBP). Foreign exchange risk arises from
future commercial transactions (e.g. costs for clinical services) and recognized assets and liabilities. Management has set up
a policy to manage the foreign exchange risk against their functional currency. To manage its foreign exchange risk arising
from future commercial transactions and recognized assets and liabilities, the Group’s finance department maintains
foreign currency cash balances to cover anticipated future requirements.
The sensitivity of profit or loss to changes in the exchange rates in the reported periods are as follows:

EUR positions

2016

2015

GBP positions

2016

2015

Increase /decrease
exchange rate vs CHF

+5%
-5%
+5%
-5%

Increase /decrease
exchange rate vs CHF

+5%
-5%
+5%
-5%

Effect on profit before
tax
(in USD ‘000)
274
(274)
395
(395)

Effect on shareholders’
equity
(in USD ‘000)
274
(274)
395
(395)

Effect on profit before
tax
(in USD ‘000)
193
(193)
65
(65)

Effect on shareholders’
equity
(in USD ‘000)
193
(193)
65
(65)

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016

Increase /decrease
exchange rate vs CHF

+5%

-5%
+5%
-5%

Effect on profit before
tax
(in USD ‘000)
349

Effect on shareholders’
equity
(in USD ‘000)
349

(349)
22
(22)

USD positions

2016

2015

Credit risk

Cash and cash equivalents are deposited with top tier banks and institutions with a rating of “A-1” or “P-1” with Standard
& Poor’s and Moody’s, respectively.

The maximum credit risk exposure the Group faces in connection with its financial assets, being cash and cash equivalents
and other receivables, is the carrying amounts of these balances as shown in the consolidated balance sheet.

Interest rate risk

The Group’s exposure to interest rate fluctuations is limited because the Group has no interest-bearing indebtedness.
Recent decisions to apply negative interests on bank deposits, especially in Switzerland, would expose the Group to certain
interest risks on interest-bearing assets, which are, however, assessed as limited.

Liquidity risk

The Group’s principal source of liquidity is the cash reserves which are obtained through the issuance of new shares. The
Group’s policy is to invest these funds in low risk investments including interest bearing deposits. The ability of the Group
to maintain adequate cash reserves to sustain its activities in the medium term is subject to risk as it is highly dependent on
the Group’s ability to raise further funds from the sale of new shares.

3.2 Capital management

The Group’s objectives when managing capital are to safeguard the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern in order
to ensure the financing of successful research and development activities so that future profits can be generated and to
maintain sufficient financial resources to mitigate against risks and unforeseen events.

The Group is also subject to capital maintenance requirement under Swiss law. To ensure that statutory capital
requirements are met, the Group monitors capital periodically. The Group may issue new shares in order to maintain
sufficient cash position.

3.3 Fair value estimation and financial instruments

The carrying value less impairment provision of receivables and payables approximate their fair values due to their short-
term nature.

All financial assets and liabilities, respectively, are held at their amortized cost.

The Group's financial assets consist of cash and cash equivalents and other receivables which are classified as loans and
receivables at amortized costs according to IAS 39. The Group's financial liabilities consist of other payables and accruals
which are classified as other liabilities at amortized cost according to IAS 39.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016

4. Cash and cash equivalents

in USD ‘000
Bank deposits…………………………………………………………………………
Interest bearing deposits………………………………………………………………
Total cash and cash equivalents as at December 31………………………………

Split by currency:

CHF…………………………………………………………………………………...
USD…………………………………………………………………………………...
EUR…………………………………………………………………………………...
GBP…………………………………………………………………………………...

As at December 31,
2015
43,801
10,474
54,275

2016
23,292
2,216
25,508

2016
68%
20%
10%
2%

2015
54%
21%
20%
5%

5. Receivables and payables

As at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, other receivables consist mainly of reimbursements to be received from
third parties, including VAT, insurance premiums and shared-costs of research and development studies, and other payables
and other current liabilities include mainly costs of clinical services. All receivables and payables are due from and to third
parties and carried at amortised cost.

All payables have a contract maturity within 1 year.

6. Prepaid expenses and deferred costs

Prepaid expenses and deferred costs include USD 2.1 million of prepayments and USD 0.3 million of costs which have been
incurred in connection with the Group’s planned Initial Public Offering (“IPO”) and related issuance of new shares. These
costs, which consist principally of legal fees, have been deferred and will be deducted from equity upon issuance of the new
shares.

7. Plant and equipment

in USD ‘000
Net book value as at January 1…………………………
Additions…………………………………………………
Depreciation charge………………………………………
Currency translation effects………………………………
Net book value as at December 31………………………
Total cost…………………………………………………………
Accumulated depreciation………………………………………

2016
124
45
(46)
(2)
121
223
(102)

2015
111
50
(36)
(1)
124
182
(58)

Plant and equipment assets mainly consist of office furniture and leasehold improvements.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016

8. Intangible assets

in USD ‘000
Net book value as at January 1…………………………
Additions…………………………………………………
Amortization charge………………………………………
Currency translation effects………………………………
Net book value as at December 31………………………
Total cost…………………………………………………………
Accumulated amortization………………………………………

2016
16,857
-
-
(249)
16,608
16,608
-

2015
4,548
12,372
-
(63)
16,857
16,857
-

As at December 31, 2016, the Group holds a number of licenses to operate several biopharmaceutical product candidates, the
value of which is recorded at USD 16.6 million (2015: USD 16.9 million).

Merck Serono licenses

On August 28, 2013, the Group in-licensed nolasiban for USD 4.9 million from Ares Trading S.A., an affiliate of Merck
Serono (“Merck Serono”).

In June 2015, the Group acquired the in-license for OBE022 from Merck Serono for a consideration including 325,000 series
A preferred shares. The consideration payment was contingent on the initiation of a Phase 1 clinical trial by the Group.

In accordance with IFRS 2 Share Based Payments, the in-license acquisition is measured directly, “at the fair value of the
goods or services received, unless that fair value cannot be estimated reliably”.

Considering the very early-stage of the product candidate, and the high uncertainty and sensitivity attached to the assumptions
used in a fair valuation model of the license received, management deemed that the in-license could not be reliably measured,
and measured instead the value of the in-license, indirectly, by reference to the fair value of the equity instruments granted.

As a result, the Group recognised the in-license for an amount of USD 2.4 million, based on (i) its best available estimate of
the number of equity instruments expected to vest and be issued (325,000 series A preferred shares), and (ii) the fair value
(CHF 6.79) of the Company’s equity instruments issued at the transaction date.

Management used an income approach to determine the Company’s equity value at the transaction date, from which the fair
value of the series A preferred share was derived using varying allocation methodologies to each classes of shares.

Kissei license

On November 19, 2015, the Group entered into an exclusive in-license and supply agreement with Kissei Pharmaceutical
Co., Ltd. (“Kissei”) to acquire the product candidate OBE2109 for which Kissei successfully completed Phase 2 trial in
Japan. This in-license agreement grants the Group an exclusive license to use, develop and commercialize the product
candidate worldwide excluding certain Asian countries. This in-license was acquired for an upfront cash consideration of
USD 10 million, with additional contingent payments upon occurrence of certain milestones (note 19).

The Group has concluded that the Merck Serono licenses and the Kissei license acquisitions do not qualify as business
combinations per IFRS 3, as the Group did not acquire processes that are capable of producing outputs given the in-licensed
compounds are very early-stage.

Amortization and impairment

The licenses are currently not amortized as no regulatory and marketing approvals were obtained.

In accordance with IAS 38, the licenses have been reviewed for impairment by assessing the fair value less costs of disposal
(“FVLCOD”). The valuation is considered to be Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy due to unobservable inputs used in the
valuation. No impairment was identified.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016

The key assumptions used in the valuation model (income approach) to determine the FVLCOD of the licenses are as follows:

• Expected research and development costs;

• Probabilities of achieving development milestones based on industry standards;

• Reported disease prevalence;

• Expected market share;

• Drug reimbursement, costs of goods and marketing expenses; and

• Expected patent life.

The valuation model covers a 20-year period due to the length of the development cycle for assets of this nature. A discount
factor of 15%, based on the assumed cost of capital for the Group, has been used over the forecast period.

Based on sensitivity analysis performed, including changes in discount rates and peak sales assumptions, no reasonably
possible change in assumption would cause the carrying value of the licenses to exceed their recoverable amount.

9. Other long-term assets

The Group’s other long-term assets mainly consist of security rental deposits for the Group’s offices.

10. Post-employment benefits

In accordance with the mandatory Swiss pension fund law, all employees of the Company participate in a retirement
defined benefit plan. Swiss based pension plans are governed by the Swiss Federal Law on Occupational Retirement,
Survivors’ and Disability Pension Plans (the “LPP”), which stipulates that pension plans are to be managed by independent,
legally autonomous units. Under the terms of the pension plan, participants are insured against the financial consequences
of old age, disability and death. The various insurance benefits are governed by regulations, with the LPP specifying the
minimum benefits that are to be provided. The employer and employees pay contributions to the pension plan. In the event
the pension plan's statutory funding falls below a certain level, various measures can be taken to increase funding above
such level, such as increasing the current contribution, lowering the interest rate on the retirement account balances or
reducing the additional prospective benefits. The employer can also make additional restructuring contributions. Since the
risks of death and disability are fully reinsured by an insurance group, the savings plan must be qualified as a defined
benefit plan. As required by IAS 19 Employee Benefits, the projected unit credit method has been used in the calculation of
present value of the benefit obligations and the related current service cost.

The investment risk is borne by the insurer and the reinsurer respectively, and the investment decision is taken by the board
of trustees of the collective insurance.

In 2016, the pension fund changed the pension conversion rates, what has been considered as an amendment of the pension
plan.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016

in USD ‘000
Change in defined benefit obligation
Defined benefit obligation at January 1,…………………………………………
Current service cost…………………………………………………………………
Interest cost………………………………………………………………………….
Net benefits paid……………………………………………………………………
Currency translation effects………………………………………………………….
Remeasurements:
Impact of plan amendment…………………………………………………………..
Effect of changes in demographic assumptions……………………………………..
Effect of changes in financial assumptions…………………………………………..
Effect in experience assumptions…………………………………………………….
Defined benefit obligation at December 31,……………………………………….

in USD ‘000
Change in plan assets
Fair value of plan assets at January 1, ……………………………………………
Interest income……………………………………………………………………….
Employer contributions………………………………………………………………
Employee contributions………………………………………………………………
Net benefits paid……………………………………………………………………...
Currency translation effects…………………………………………………………..
Remeasurements: return on plan assets (excluding interest income)………………...
Fair value of plan assets at December 31,…………………………………………

in USD ‘000

Components of defined benefit cost
Current service cost…………………………………………………………………..
Interest expense on defined benefit obligation……………………………………….
Interest income on plan assets………………………………………………………..
Employee contributions………………………………………………………………
Impact of plan amendment…………………………………………………………...
Total included in staff costs (note 14)……………………………………………...

in USD ‘000
Remeasurements recognized in other comprehensive loss
Effect of changes in demographic assumptions……………………………………...
Effect of changes in financial assumptions…………………………………………..
Effect in experience assumptions…………………………………………………….
Return on plan assets (excluding interest income)…………………………………...
Total remeasurements recognized as other comprehensive loss…………………
Cumulative amount of remeasurements immediately recognized in other
comprehensive loss…………………………………………………………………...

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

2016

2015

(7,765)
(774)
(70)
(643)
163

512
(316)
(203)
(105)
(9,201)

2016

5,102
50
333
333
643
(117)
25
6,369

(4,368)
(578)
(66)
(1,558)
189

-
-
(411)
(973)
(7,765)

2015

3,048
52
267
267
1,559
(119)
28
5,102

Year ended December 31,
2015

2016

774
70
(50)
(333)
(512)
(51)

577
66
(52)
(267)
-
324

Year ended December 31,
2015

2016

(316)
(203)
(105)
25
(599)

(3,439)

-
(411)
(973)
28
(1,356)

(2,840)

Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016

in USD ‘000
Amounts recognized in the statement of financial position
Defined benefit obligation……………………………………………………………
Fair value of plan assets………………………………………………………………
Net liability…………………………………………………………………………..

in USD ‘000
Change in defined benefit liability
Net defined benefit liability at January 1,…………………………………………
Defined benefit cost included in statement of comprehensive loss…………………..
Total remeasurements included in other comprehensive loss………………………..
Employer contributions………………………………………………………………
Currency translation effects………………………………………………………….
Net defined benefit liability at December 31,………………………………………

As at December 31,
2015

2016

(9,201)
6,369
(2,832)

(7,765)
5,102
(2,663)

2016

2015

(2,663)
51
(599)
333
46
(2,832)

(1,320)
(324)
(1,356)
267
70
(2,663)

As of the date of preparation of these consolidated financial statements, the annual report for 2016 of the pension fund has
not yet been issued, and therefore the detailed structures and assets held at December 31, 2016, are not currently available
for presentation. The detailed structures and assets held at December 31, 2015, are as follows:

Plan assets

Cash…………………………………………………………………………………..
Bonds…………………………………………………………………………………
Shares…………………………………………………………………………………
Real estate……………………………………………………………………………
Mortgages…………………………………………………………………………….
Alternative investments……………………………………………………………….
Total

As at December
31, 2015
0.3%
70.4%
7.9%
14.0%
7.3%
0.1%
100.0%

To develop the expected long-term rate of return on asset assumption, the Group considered the current level of expected
returns on risk free investments (high-quality corporate bonds), the historical level of the risk premium associated with the
other asset classes in which the portfolio is invested, and the expectation for future returns of each asset allocation.

The principal actuarial assumptions used were as follows:

Discount rate………………………………………………………………………….
Salary increase (including inflation)………………………………………………….
Rate of pension increases……………………………………………………………..
Post-employment mortality table……………………………………………………..

2016
0.70%
1.00%
0.25%
LPP 2015 G

2015
0.85%
1.00%
0.25%
LPP 2010 G

Sensitivity analysis illustrates the sensitivity of the Group defined benefit obligation at December 31, 2016 by varying the
discount rate and the salary increase rate by plus / minus 50 basis points:

in USD ‘000

Sensitivity analysis…………
Discount rate………………..
Salary increase………………
Rate of pension increases……
Defined benefit obligation…

Discount
rate

Discount
rate
plus 50bps minus 50bps

Salary
Salary
increase
increase
plus 50bps minus 50bps

1.20%
1.00%
0.25%
(8,362)

0.20%
1.00%
0.25%
(10,182)

0.70%
1.50%
0.25%
(9,275)

0.70%
0.50%
0.25%
(9,132)

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Rate of
Rate of
pension
pension
increase
increase
plus 25bps minus 25bps

0.70%
1.00%
0.50%
(9,483)

0.70%
1.00%
0.00%
(8,934)

Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016

Average duration of the defined benefit obligation

Duration in years…………………………

2016

19.8

2015

19.1

Expected contributions by the employer to be paid to the post-employment benefit plans during the annual period
beginning after the end of the reporting period amount to approximately USD 360,000.

11. Shareholders’ equity

Common
shares

Preferred
A shares

Number of shares
Non-
voting
shares

Preferred
B shares

in USD ’000

Total shares

Share
capital

Share
premium

Total

January 1, 2015……………

1,300,000

7,706,777

Issuance of common shares…

915,434

Issuance of preferred B shares
Final contribution on partly
paid shares…………………..
Transaction costs arising on
share issues……………..……
Issuance of non-voting shares
to employees………………..
-
December 31, 2015………… 2,215,434

11,079,549

164,684

9,171,461

915,434

11,079,549

764

845

23,255

24,019

2,378

2,448

58,637

59,482

16,270

(1,433)

182,429

490

505

7,706,777

11,079,549

347,113

21,348,873

1,694

99,597

101,291

Common
shares

Preferred
A shares

Number of shares
Non-
voting
shares

Preferred
B shares

in USD ’000

Total shares

Share
capital

Share
premium

Total

January 1, 2016……………

2,215,434

7,706,777

11,079,549

347,113

21,348,873

1,694

99,597

101,291

Issuance of preferred A shares
Transaction costs arising on
share issues……………..……
Issuance of non-voting shares
to employees………………..
Offset of accumulated deficit
with share premium…………
-
December 31, 2016………… 2,215,434

325,000

2,366

2,392

325,000

264,524

(33)

675

(33)

695

(30,639)

8,031,777

11,079,549

611,637

21,938,397

1,740

71,966

73,706

Share Capital and Share Premium

As at December 31, 2016, the total outstanding share capital of USD 1.7 million, fully paid, consists of 2,215,434 common
shares, 8,031,777 series A preferred shares, 11,079,549 series B preferred shares and 611,637 non-voting shares. All shares
have a nominal value of 1/13 of a Swiss franc, translated into USD using historical rates at the issuance date. Series A
preferred shares and series B preferred shares have preferential rights as to the liquidation dividends and proceeds within the
terms of the articles of association, and confer the same voting rights as those attached to common shares. In case of an IPO,
all series A and series B preferred shares shall automatically be converted into common shares. Based on the terms and
conditions attached to the preferred shares, management concluded to a classification of those shares as equity.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016

On December 10, 2014, the Group called the second tranche of the subscription price of the series A preferred shares, out of
which USD 16.3 million were settled and recognized in 2015.

On November 19, 2015, the Group issued 915,434 common shares at a subscription price of 1/13 of a Swiss franc per share
as a result of anti-dilution provisions (note 18) and 11,079,549 series B preferred shares at a subscription price of CHF 5.42
(USD 5.37) per share, amounting to a total CHF 60.1 million (USD 59.6 million).

In August 2016, the Group’s product candidate known as OBE022 entered into a Phase 1 clinical trial, triggering the
obligation of payment to Merck Serono of the 325,000 series A preferred shares due upon occurrence of that event. The
325,000 shares were issued through a capital increase of the Group on September 28, 2016, and an amount of USD 2.4 million
was reclassified from the share-based payment reserve to the share premium.

Non-Voting Share Capital

As at December 31, 2016, the total outstanding non-voting share capital amounting to USD 49,084, fully paid, consists of
611,637 non-voting shares issued at the end of the vesting period associated with the Plan. All non-voting shares have a
nominal value of 1/13 of a Swiss franc, translated into USD using historical rates at the issuance date.

The non-voting shares are part of the non-voting share capital and have the same financial rights than those attached to
common shares. The non-voting shares do not confer the right to vote or to participate in the ordinary and extraordinary
meetings of the Group. In case of an IPO, all non-voting shares shall automatically be converted into common shares.

Authorized voting and non-voting share capital

The authorized voting share capital and authorized non-voting share capital that are not outstanding as at December 31, 2016
and December 31, 2015 are as follows:

Number of shares

Authorized voting share capital…………………………………

Authorized non-voting share capital……………………………

Offset of accumulated deficit with share premium

2016

11,590,631

As at December 31,
2015

1,096,992

On February 23, 2016, the shareholders voted for statutory purposes a resolution to offset the accumulated losses with the
share premium balance for an amount of USD 30.6 million. Such transaction had no impact on the overall equity position.

12. Revenue and other income

The Group currently derives no revenue from sales of its biopharmaceutical product candidates.

Other income in 2016 mainly relates to compensation received from the Swiss tax authorities as the Company acts as
collecting agent of the withholding tax on salaries.

Other income in 2015 and 2014 mainly relates to consulting services rendered to third parties by the Company.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016

13. Operating expenses by nature

in USD ‘000
External research and development costs………………………………………
Staff costs (note 14)……………………………………………………………
Professional fees………………………………………………………………
Rents……………………………………………………………………………
Travel expenses…………………………………………………………………
Patent registration costs…………………………………………………………
Depreciation……………………………………………………………………
Other……………………………………………………………………………
Total operating expenses by nature…………………………………………

Year ended December 31,

2016
16,811
7,436
4,016
427
541
512
46
374
30,163

2015
10,784
7,313
743
367
313
87
36
203
19,846

2014
7,881
3,922
370
420
126
46
20
177
12,962

Due to the difficulty in assessing when research and development projects would generate revenue, the Group expenses all
research and development costs on the consolidated statement of comprehensive loss. In 2016, research and development
expenses amounted to USD 23.7 million (2015: USD 16.9 million, 2014: USD 11.4 million).

The depreciation expense has been allocated as follows:

in USD ‘000
Research and development expenses……………………………………………
General and administrative expenses……………………………………………
Total depreciation……………………………………………………………...

Year ended December 31,

2016
35
11
46

2015
28
8
36

2014
17
3
20

14. Staff costs

in USD ‘000
Wages and salaries………………………………………………………………
Social charges……………………………………………………………………
Post-employment benefits expense……………………………………………...
Share-based payments…………………………………………………………...
Total staff costs…………………………………………………………………

Year ended December 31,
2014
2,990
256
139
537
3,922

2015
3,384
337
324
3,268
7,313

2016
4,807
443
(51)
2,237
7,436

The Group employed on average 22.4 full-time equivalents (“FTE”) in 2016, compared to 16.2 FTE in 2015 and 12.6 FTE
in 2014, and 25.3 FTE as at December 31, 2016 compared to 19.9 FTE as at December 31, 2015 and 14.1 FTE as et December
31, 2014.

For the year ended December 31, 2016, the post-employment benefits line includes a gain of USD 512,000 relating to the
plan amendment enacted in 2016.

15. Finance income and expense

Finance income mainly relates to foreign exchange gains and interests on bank deposits.
Finance expense mainly relates to foreign exchange losses and interest expense.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016

16. Income taxes and deferred taxes

Because the Group has incurred net losses since its inception, it has no current income tax expenses.

In 2015, the Group was granted by the State Council of the Canton of Geneva an exemption of income and capital tax at
municipal and cantonal levels for the period from 2013 until 2022.

The following details the tax losses carry forwards and their respective expiring dates. Due to the uncertainty surrounding
the future results of operations and the uncertainty as to whether the Group can use the losses carry forwards for tax
purposes, no deferred taxes have been recognized on the balance sheet.

Expiring tax losses

in USD ‘000
2020………………………………………………………………......
2021…………………………………………………………………..
2022…………………………………………………………………..
2023…………………………………………………………………..
Total unrecorded tax losses carry forwards………………………

As at December 31,

2016
2,808
11,123
15,602
27,484
57,017

2015
2,850
11,289
15,836
-
29,975

17. Loss per share

As of December 31, 2016, the Company's ordinary shares are comprised of common shares and non-voting shares. In
addition, the Company has issued preferred A and preferred B shares. As the preferred A and preferred B shares participate
with ordinary shares in the profit or loss on a pro-rata basis, the net loss is allocated to each class pro-rata to their weighted
average number of shares outstanding during the period. The basic loss per share is calculated by dividing the loss of the
period attributable to the ordinary shares by the weighted average number of ordinary shares (common and non-voting)
outstanding during the period as follows:

Net loss attributable to shareholders (in USD ‘000)…
Weighted average number of shares outstanding……
Basic and diluted loss per share (in USD)…………

Year ended December 31, 2016

Preferred B shares
(15,516)
11,079,549
(1.40)

Preferred A shares
(10,910)
7,790,475
(1.40)

Common and non-
voting shares

(3,776)
2,695,898
(1.40)

Year ended December 31, 2015

Preferred B shares
(2,380)
1,274,910
(1.87)

Preferred A shares
(14,384)
7,706,777
(1.87)

Common and non-
voting shares

(3,102)
1,661,231
(1.87)

Year ended December 31, 2014

Preferred B shares
-
-
-

Preferred A shares
(10,860)
7,706,777
(1.41)

Common and non-
voting shares

(1,949)
1,382,342
(1.41)

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016

For the year ended December 31, 2016, 1,242,862 non-vested shares, which would have an anti-dilutive impact on the
calculation of the diluted earnings per share, are excluded from the calculation (years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014:
686,647 and 602,576 non-vested shares excluded, respectively).

18. Share-based compensation

The total expenses arising from share-based payment transactions recognized during the period as part of staff costs were as
follows:

Year ended December 31,

in USD ‘000
Employee share plan……………………………………………………………
Anti-dilution provisions…………………………………………………………
Total share-based compensation………………………………………………

2016
2,237
-
2,237

2015
890
2,378
3,268

2014
537
-
537

Employee share plan

The Company has established the Plan for employees, executives, directors and consultants (the “Beneficiaries”) of the
Group. This equity-settled plan entitles the Beneficiaries to acquire a certain amount of the Company’s non-voting shares at
a pre-determined price (1/13 of a Swiss franc). The possibility to enrol in the Plan and acquire shares is generally offered at
the hiring date as well as on the basis of employees’ performance. The Beneficiaries may elect not to participate in the
Plan.

Upon Beneficiaries’ enrolment in the Plan, Beneficiaries are granted a certain number of shares which they are entitled to
acquire. The pre-determined price is generally paid by the Beneficiaries at the grant date and recognized as a pre-payment
until the vesting period elapses resulting in the shares issuance being accounted for.

The shares generally fully vest over a four year vesting period, with 25% of the shares underlying the grant vesting after
one year, and 1/48th of the shares underlying the grant vesting each month over a further period of three years.

The Group has no present obligation to repurchase or settle the shares in cash.

Number of shares issued under the plan……………………………
Average grant date fair value (in USD)…………………………….
Expense arising from the plan (in USD ’000)………………………

2016
264,524
11.37
2,237

2015
182,429
2.48
890

2014
164,684
3.95
537

The fair value of the shares was calculated using a combination of the discounted cash flow method, under the income
approach, and the backsolve method. The income approach estimates value based on the expectation of future cash flows
that the Company will generate, such as cash earnings, costs savings, tax deduction and the proceeds from disposition.
These future cash flows were discounted to their present values using a discount rate derived based on an analysis of the
cost of capital of comparable publicly traded companies in similar lines of business, as of each valuation date, and was
adjusted to reflect the risks inherent in the Company’s cash flows. The backsolve method, a form of the market approach to
valuation, derives the implied enterprise equity value and the fair value of the non-voting share from a recent and
contemporaneous transaction involving the Company’s own securities, using the following assumptions: rights and
preferences of the different categories of shares, probability of various liquidity event scenarios, expected timing of a
liquidity event, volatility and expected value in a liquidity event.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016

Anti-dilution provisions

The shareholders’ agreement signed in 2013 includes specific anti-dilution clauses benefiting one of the Group’s founders,
Ernest Loumaye (the “Founder”). Subject to specified exceptions, per this clause, if, as a result of a share issuance, the
Founder’s shareholding in the Group’s certain classes of shares is diluted below 10%, then the Founder is entitled to
acquire at nominal value (1/13 of a Swiss franc) a number of common shares allowing him to maintain his shareholding at
10%.

In November 2015, the completion of a round of financing (note 11) triggered this clause which resulted in the issuance of
915,434 common shares to the Founder.

In accordance with IFRS 2, such transaction resulted in a share-based expense of USD 2.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2015. The fair value of the common shares delivered to the Founder was calculated using a backsolve
method (USD 2.68).
The anti-dilution provisions had no impact for the year ended December 31, 2016.

19. Commitments and contingencies

Operating lease commitments

in USD ‘000
Within 1 year………………………………………………………
Later than 1 year and no later than 5 years……………………….
Later than 5 years………………………………………………….
Total……………………………………………………………….

As at December 31,
2015
246
369
-
615

2016
243
121
-
364

Operating lease commitments relate to the Group’s lease for its headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland.

Contingencies

As a result of the licenses granted to the Group, the following contingencies are to be noted:

Kissei license

Under the terms of the license and supply agreement, the Group would be obligated to make milestone payments upon the
achievement of specified regulatory milestones with respect to OBE2109. The total of all potential undiscounted future
payments that the Group could be required to make under this arrangement ranges between USD 0 and USD 188 million.

Pursuant to the Kissei license and supply agreement, the Group has agreed to exclusively purchase the active
pharmaceutical ingredient for OBE2109 from Kissei. During the development stage, the Group is obligated to pay Kissei a
specified supply price. Following the first commercial sale of licensed product, the Group is obligated to pay Kissei a
royalty payment in the low twenty percent range as a percentage of net sales, which includes payment for Kissei’s supply
of the active pharmaceutical ingredient until the latest of the date that the valid claim of a patent for the product has
expired, the expiration of our regulatory exclusivity period or 15 years from the first commercial sale of such product on a
country-by-country and product-by-product basis.

Merck Serono licenses

Under the terms of the two license agreements with Merck Serono for nolasiban and OBE022, the Group would be
obligated to pay Merck Serono a high-single digit and a mid-single digit royalty, respectively, of net sales generated by the
Group, its affiliates or sub-licensees of any product containing the in-licensed compounds.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016

20. Related parties transactions

As of December 31, 2016, the Group’s related parties only consist in affiliates of the Company, key management (Board of
Directors and Executive Committee) and members of their immediate families. No individual shareholder is considered as
a related party.

• Key management remuneration

The Board of Directors is composed of 9 members (with 8 directors in 2015), whereas the Executive Committee is
composed of 5 members (with 8 members in 2015). The following table sets forth the total remuneration recorded for
members of the Board of Directors and Executive Committee:

in USD ‘000
Short-term employee benefits (including base and variable cash
remuneration)……………………………………………………….
Post-employment benefits…………………………………………
Share-based payments……………………………………………...
Total………………………………………………………………..

Year ended December 31,
2015

2016

1,890

(18)
1,614
3,486

2,067

179
3,121
5,367

Share-based payments in 2015 mainly include the effect of the anti-dilution provisions (note 18).

• Other transactions with related parties

There were no other significant transactions with related parties during the years presented.

21. Going concern

The Group fulfills its obligations by the use of its cash reserves and, due to its development-stage activities, has experienced
cumulative losses since the inception of the Company, which raised substantial doubt as to its ability to continue as a going
concern in the evaluation period, defined by the management as being one year from the balance sheet date of December 31,
2016. However, the Company has successfully completed an IPO on January 25, 2017 and as a result, the substantial doubt
has been alleviated. Therefore the Board of Directors believes the Group will be able to meet all of its obligations for a further
12 months as they fall due and, hence, the consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis.

22. Events after the reporting period

Share capital
On January 25, 2017, the Company raised gross proceeds of USD 96.8 million, or net proceeds of approximately USD 86.8
million, in an IPO on The NASDAQ Global Select Market, a U.S. market. The IPO closed on January 30, 2017 with the
issuance of 6,450,000 new ordinary shares at a subscription price of USD 15.00 per share and a par value of 1/13 of a Swiss
franc per share. All existing series A preferred shares, series B preferred shares and non-voting shares were immediately
converted into common shares as of the IPO date. After the IPO, the Company has 29,631,262 common shares outstanding.

There were no other material events after the balance sheet date.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

ObsEva SA Plan-les-Ouates Report of the statutory auditor to the General Meeting on the consolidated financial statements 2016

Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016
Report of the Statutory Auditor to the General Meeting

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Report of the statutory auditor to the General Meeting of ObsEva SA Plan-les-Ouates Report on the audit of the consolidated financial statements Opinion We have audited the consolidated financial statements of ObsEva SA and its subsidiaries (the Group), which comprise the consolidated statement of financial position as at 31 December 2016 and the consolidated statement of comprehensive loss, consolidated statement of changes in equity and consolidated statement of cash flows for the year then ended, and notes to the consolidated financial statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies. In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated financial statements give a true and fair view of the consolidated financial position of the Group as at 31 December 2016 and its consolidated financial performance and its consolidated cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and comply with Swiss law. Basis for opinion We conducted our audit in accordance with Swiss law, International Standards on Auditing (ISAs) and Swiss Auditing Standards. Our responsibilities under those provisions and standards are further described in the “Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated financial statements” section of our report. We are independent of the Group in accordance with the provisions of Swiss law and the requirements of the Swiss audit profession, as well as the IESBA Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants, and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. Our audit approach Overview Overall Group materiality: USD 299,000 We conducted a full scope audit work at the holding and principal operating entity in Switzerland. Our audit scope addressed 100% of the Group's loss before tax. As key audit matter the following area of focus has been identified: • Valuation used in share-based compensation

Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016
Report of the Statutory Auditor to the General Meeting

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Audit scope We conducted our audit work for one country (Switzerland), and entity, namely ObsEva SA, covering 100% of the group due to the dormant status of the Irish subsidiary, and the lack of activity in the newly-created US subsidiary. We designed our audit by determining materiality and assessing the risks of material misstatement in the consolidated financial statements. In particular, we considered where subjective judgements were made; for example, in respect of significant accounting estimates that involved making assumptions and considering future events that are inherently uncertain, such as the defined benefit obligation, the valuation applied in the share-based compensation, and the going concern assumption. As in all of our audits, we also addressed the risk of management override of internal controls, including among other matters consideration of whether there was evidence of bias that represented a risk of material misstatement due to fraud. We tailored the scope of our audit in order to perform sufficient work to enable us to provide an opinion on the consolidated financial statements as a whole, taking into account the structure of the Group, the accounting processes and controls, and the industry in which the Group operates. Materiality The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. Our audit opinion aims to provide reasonable assurance that the consolidated financial statements are free from material misstatement. Misstatements may arise due to fraud or error. They are considered material, if individually or in aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the consolidated financial statements. Based on our professional judgement, we determined certain quantitative thresholds for materiality, including the overall Group materiality for the consolidated financial statements as a whole as set out in the table below. These, together with qualitative considerations, helped us to determine the scope of our audit and the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect of misstatements, both individually and in aggregate, on the consolidated financial statements as a whole. Overall Group materiality USD 299,000 How we determined it Total expenses Rationale for the materiality benchmark applied Profit before tax is not considered an appropriate benchmark as the Company is a start-up company still in the developmental phase, and has no recurring revenue. Based on the nature of the Company we determined total expenses as the most appropriate benchmark, applying a 1% rule of thumb. Key audit matters Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the consolidated financial statements of the current period. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the consolidated financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.

Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016
Report of the Statutory Auditor to the General Meeting

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

Valuation used in share-based compensation Key audit matter , An equity settled share plan has been in place since 2013, under which executives, directors, employees, agents and consultants are all eligible for awards. During the period under audit non-voting shares were granted under this plan. Since the Company was a private start-up as of December 31, 2016, with no commercialized products or revenues, determining a value for the company involved a number of significant judgements. In addition the allocation of that valuation to the various categories of shares also involves elements of judgement. Since there is a risk of management bias to understate the corresponding expense, which is material to the reported results, we considered this item to be a key audit matter. The company was valued using a combination of the discounted future cash flow method and the backsolve method. The forecasting of future cashflows involved judgements around the probability of successful completion and commercialisation of the various compounds, the eventual pricing, and potential market share of each compound as well as future cost estimates. Management engaged valuation specialists to assist them in this share valuation. Refer to Note 18 for disclosure in the financial statements. Due to the inherent complexity of the models and the very specialised nature of the underlying judgements, we involved both valuation and bio-pharma specialists in our work. With their assistance we performed the following: - We obtained an understanding of both management’s forecast and the models used during the valuation exercise. - We assessed management’s valuation, the key inputs, assumptions, and business forecasts. We compared these inputs, where possible, against third-party industry reports and comparable companies. - We assessed the consistency of application of the model with prior periods. - We assessed the competence, capability, objectivity, and independence of the external experts employed by management. - We compared the fair value applied in the share-based compensation expense to the post-balance sheet IPO valuation and the subsequent evolution of the share price. On the basis of the above procedures performed we determined that the valuation of the company and the allocation of the valuation to the various share categories were reasonable. Other information in the annual report The Board of Directors is responsible for the other information in the annual report. The other information comprises all information included in the annual report, but does not include the consolidated financial statements, the stand-alone financial statements of ObsEva SA and our auditor’s reports thereon. Our opinion on the consolidated financial statements does not cover the other information in the annual report and we do not express any form of assurance conclusion thereon. In connection with our audit of the consolidated financial statements, our responsibility is to read the other information in the annual report and, in doing so, consider whether the other information is materially inconsistent with the consolidated financial statements or our knowledge obtained in the audit, or otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If, based on the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact. We have nothing to report in this regard.

Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016
Report of the Statutory Auditor to the General Meeting

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

control as the Board of Directors determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In preparing the consolidated financial statements, the Board of Directors is responsible for assessing the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the Board of Directors either intends to liquidate the Group or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so. Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the consolidated financial statements Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with Swiss law, ISAs and Swiss Auditing Standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these consolidated financial statements. As part of an audit in accordance with Swiss law, ISAs and Swiss Auditing Standards, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also: • Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. • Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Group’s internal control. • Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made. • Conclude on the appropriateness of the Board of Directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the Group to cease to continue as a going concern. • Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the consolidated financial statements, including the disclosures, and whether the consolidated financial statements represent the underlying transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation. • Obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding the financial information of the entities or business activities within the Group to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements. We are responsible for the direction, supervision and performance of the Group audit. We remain solely responsible for our audit opinion. We communicate with the Board of Directors or its relevant committee regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit. We also provide the Board of Directors or its relevant committee with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards.

Consolidated IFRS Financial Statements for the year ended December 31, 2016
Report of the Statutory Auditor to the General Meeting

Michael Foley

Audit expert
Auditor in charge

Geneva, 22 May 2017

Enclosure:

Filippos Mintiloglitis

Audit expert

• Consolidated financial statements (consolidated statement of financial position, consolidated statement of
comprehensive loss, consolidated statement of changes in equity, consolidated statement of cash flows and
notes)

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

100

From the matters communicated with the Board of Directors or its relevant committee, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the consolidated financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication. Report on other legal and regulatory requirements In accordance with article 728a paragraph 1 item 3 CO and Swiss Auditing Standard 890, we confirm that an internal control system exists which has been designed for the preparation of consolidated financial statements according to the instructions of the Board of Directors. We recommend that the consolidated financial statements submitted to you be approved. PricewaterhouseCoopers SA

Statutory Financial Statements
of ObsEva S.A.
for the year ended December 31, 2016

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

101

Statutory Financial Statements of ObsEva S.A. for the year ended December 31, 2016

Balance Sheet as at 31 December

(in CHF)

ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents………………..
Other current receivables…………………
Deferred costs and prepaid expenses……..
Total current assets……………………...

Non-current assets
Financial assets…………………………...
Investments……………………………….
Property, plant and equipment……………
Intangible assets…………………………..
Total non-current assets………………...

Total assets………………………………

LIABILITIES & SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
Trade payables……………………………
Other current liabilities…………………...
Accrued expenses………………………...
Total current liabilities………………….

Shareholders’ equity
Share capital………………………………
Non-voting share capital………………….
Treasury non-voting shares……………….
Legal reserve from capital contribution…..
Accumulated deficit………………………
Total shareholders’ equity……………...

Notes

2016

2015

5
6
7
8

4
4

25,915,961
795,751
2,453,351
29,165,063

90,813
3
123,106
14,735,432
14,949,354

54,328,989
68,733
311,044
54,708,766

90,804
3
124,062
14,735,432
14,950,301

44,114,417

69,659,067

2,231,894
93,764
4,337,639
6,663,297

1,640,520
142,654
(400)
63,592,444
(27,924,098)
37,451,120

644,282
61,367
3,981,470
4,687,119

1,615,520
58,270
(6,181)
93,309,379
(30,005,040)
64,971,948

Total liabilities & shareholders’ equity..

44,114,417

69,659,067

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these financial statements.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

102

Statutory Financial Statements of ObsEva S.A. for the year ended December 31, 2016

(in CHF)

INCOME
Income from services……………………..

Other income……………………………..

Total income……………………………..

OPERATING EXPENSES
Staff costs…………………………………
External research and development costs...
Patent costs……………………………….
Professional fees………………………….
Facilities…………………………………..
Other operating expenses…………………
Depreciation………………………………
Total operating expenses………………..

Statement of Income

Notes

2016

2015

—

21,310

(5,499,947)
(16,558,718)
(504,003)
(3,956,266)
(421,038)
(900,349)
(45,650)
(27,885,971)

9,150

6,941

16,091

(3,838,157)
(10,377,520)
(83,884)
(715,411)
(352,911)
(496,906)
(34,578)
(15,899,367)

OPERATING LOSS…………………….

(27,864,661)

(15,883,276)

Finance income…………………………...
Finance expense…………………………..

35,688
(95,125)

31,686
—

NET LOSS BEFORE TAX……………..

(27,924,098)

(15,851,590)

Income tax expense……………………….

—

NET LOSS FOR THE PERIOD……….

(27,924,098)

(15,851,590)

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these financial statements.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

103

Statutory Financial Statements of ObsEva S.A. for the year ended December 31, 2016

Notes to the Financial Statements 2016

1. General information

ObsEva Ltd was founded on 14 November 2012 in Geneva, Switzerland, and is domiciled 12 chemin des Aulx, 1228 Plan-
les-Ouates. The purpose of the Company is all activities and services in the domains of research, development, fabrication,
registration, promotion and commercialization of biotechnological and pharmaceutical products.

These statutory financial statements were authorized for issue by the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board of
Directors”) on May 16, 2017.

2. Accounting principles applied in the preparation of the financial statements

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the provisions of commercial accounting as set out in the
Swiss Code of Obligations (Art. 957 to 963b CO, effective since 1 January 2013). Significant balance sheet items are
accounted for as follows:

• Current assets

Other current receivables are carried at their nominal value. Impairment charges are calculated for these assets on
an individual basis.

• Non-current assets

Property, plant and equipment is carried at cost less depreciation. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line
method, on the basis of the following useful lives:
- furniture
- hardware
- leasehold improvement
Property, plant and equipment and intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable, on an individual basis. An impairment
loss is recognized for the amount by which the asset's carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount.

5 years
3 years
5 years

• Recognition of income

Income is recognised if its amount can be reliably measured and it is sufficiently probable that the economic benefits
will flow to the company.

• Foreign currencies

Monetary and non-monetary items in foreign currency are translated into Swiss francs as follows:
- the exchange rates used for balance sheet items are the rates prevailing on 31 December;
- the exchange rates used for transactions conducted during the course of the year and for items in the profit and loss
statement are the exchange rates prevailing at the dates of the transactions or valuations where items are re-measured.

3. Full-time positions

The company employed on the average 22.3 full-time equivalents (FTE) in 2016 (2015: 16.2 FTE) and 25.3 FTE as at 31
December 2016 (31 December 2015: 19.9 FTE).

4. Receivables and payables

As at 31 December 2016 and 31 December 2015, other current receivables, trade payables and other current liabilities are all
due from third parties. No receivables or payables are due from group companies or shareholders.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

104

Statutory Financial Statements of ObsEva S.A. for the year ended December 31, 2016

Notes to the Financial Statements 2016 (cont’d)

5. Pledges on assets to secure own liabilities

(CHF)

31 December 2016

31 December 2015

Escrow accounts…………………………

Total……………………………………..

90,813

90,804

As at 31 December 2016, CHF 90,813 were held on escrow accounts as security rental deposits (31 December 2015: CHF
90,804).

6. Investments

ObsEva SA owned as at 31 December 2016:

Company

ObsEva Ireland Ltd,
Cork, Ireland

ObsEva USA Inc.,
New York, USA

Business

Research and
development

Recognized in the balance sheet as follows:

Capital

Interest
in capital

Voting
rights

EUR 2.00

USD 0.50

100%

(CHF)

31 December 2016

31 December 2015

Shareholding ObsEva Ireland Ltd………..
Shareholding ObsEva USA Inc.………….

Total……………………………………...

7. Property, plant and equipment

(CHF)

Net book value as at 1st Jan. 15….
Additions………………………...
Depreciation charge……………..
Net book value as at 31 Dec. 15.
Total cost…………………………...
Accumulated depreciation………..

(CHF)

Net book value as at 1st Jan. 16….
Additions………………………...
Depreciation charge……………..
Net book value as at 31 Dec. 16.
Total cost…………………………...
Accumulated depreciation………..

Furniture

Hardware

10,500
31,796
(3,530)
38,766
46,796
(8,030)

19,207
16,593
(13,817)
21,983
48,792
(26,809)

Furniture

Hardware

38,766
16,234
(10,497)
44,503
63,030
(18,527)

21,983
23,831
(16,269)
29,545
72,623
(43,078)

2
1

Leasehold
improv.

80,544
—
(17,231)
63,313
86,153
(22,840)

Leasehold
improv.

63,313
4,629
(18,884)
49,058
90,782
(41,724)

3
—

Total

110,251
48,389
(34,578)
124,062
181,741
(57,679)

Total

124,062
44,694
(45,650)
123,106
226,435
(103,329)

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

105

Statutory Financial Statements of ObsEva S.A. for the year ended December 31, 2016

Notes to the Financial Statements 2016 (cont’d)

8. Intangible assets

As at 31 December 2016 and 31 December 2015, the company holds a number of licenses to operate several pharmaceutical
compounds, which were acquired for CHF 14,735,432.

9. Amounts due to pension funds

As at 31 December 2016, amounts due to pension funds amounted to CHF 184,924 (31 Dec. 2015: CHF 145,160).

10. Lease commitments not reported in the balance sheet

Operating lease commitments (including rent costs)

(CHF)

31 December 2016

31 December 2015

Within 1 year……………………………..
Later than 1 year and no later than 5 years.
Later than 5 years………………………...

Total……………………………………...

11. Shareholders’ equity

246,465
123,357
—

369,822

246,576
369,462
—

616,038

1 January 2015………………..

Issuance of ordinary shares…….
Issuance of preferred B shares…
Issuance of non-voting shares….
Costs of share capital issuance…
Repurchase of non-voting shares
Contrib. to the legal reserve……

Net loss for the year……………

Share
capital

Non-voting
share capital

Legal
reserve from
capital cont.

Accumulated
deficit

Shareholders’
equity

692,829
70,418
852,273
—
—
—
—

—

38,610
—
—
19,410
—
(5,931)
—

—

20,677,876
—
59,147,746
—
(1,766,259)
—
15,250,016

(14,153,450)
—
—
—
—
—
—

7,255,865
70,418
60,000,019
19,410
(1,766,259)
(5,931)
15,250,016

—

(15,851,590)

31 December 2015…………….

1,615,520

52,089

93,309,379

(30,005,040)

64,971,948

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

106

Statutory Financial Statements of ObsEva S.A. for the year ended December 31, 2016

Notes to the Financial Statements 2016 (cont’d)

Share
capital

Non-voting
share capital

Legal
reserve from
capital cont.

Accumulated
deficit

Shareholders’
equity

1 January 2016………………..

1,615,520

Issuance of preferred A shares…
Issuance of non-voting shares….
Costs of share capital issuance…
Sale of non-voting shares……..
Repurchase of non-voting shares

Offset of accumulated loss with
legal reserve from capital cont…

Net loss for the year……………

25,000
—
—
—
—

—

52,089

—
84,384
—
6,586
(805)

—

93,309,379

(30,005,040)

64,971,948

—
—
288,105
—
—

—
—
—
—
—

25,000
84,384
288,105
6,586
(805)

(30,005,040)

30,005,040

—

(27,924,098)

31 December 2016…………….

1,640,520

142,254

63,592,444

(27,924,098)

37,451,120

Share Capital

On December 8, 2016, the Company effected a one-for-13 forward stock split of its outstanding common, preferred and non-
voting shares. Accordingly, all share and per share amounts for all periods presented in these financial statements and notes
have been adjusted retroactively, where applicable, to reflect this forward stock split.

As at 31 December 2016, the total outstanding share capital of CHF 1,640,520, fully paid, consists of 2,215,434 ordinary
shares, 8,031,777 preferred « A » shares and 11,079,549 preferred « B » shares. Preferred « A » and preferred « B » shares
have preferential rights as to the liquidation dividends and proceeds within the terms of the articles of association. All shares
have a nominal value of 1/13 of a Swiss franc.

On 19 November 2015, the company issued 915,434 ordinary shares at a subscription price of 1/13 of a Swiss franc per share
and 11,079,549 preferred « B » shares at a subscription price of CHF5.42 per share.

On 28 September 2016, the company issued 325,000 preferred « A » shares at a subscription price of 1/13 of a Swiss franc
per share.

Non-Voting Share Capital

As at 31 December 2016, the total outstanding non-voting share capital of CHF 142,254, fully paid, consists of 1,854,502
issued non-voting shares, less 5,200 treasury non-voting shares that are held by the company. All non-voting shares have a
nominal value of 1/13 of a Swiss franc.

On 29 July 2016 and 22 November 2016, the company issued 279,500 and 817,492 non-voting shares, respectively, from its
authorized non-voting share capital, to the employees and consultants of the company. The non-voting shares are part of the
non-voting share capital and have the same financial rights than those attached to ordinary shares. The non-voting shares do
not confer the right to vote or to participate to the ordinary and extraordinary meetings of the company. In 2016, 10,465 non-
voting shares were purchased at 1/13 of a Swiss franc each to employees by the company under the claw-back provisions of
the company’s incentive plan, and 85,618 non-voting were sold at 1/13 of a Swiss franc each to employees as part of grants
made under the company’s equity incentive plan.

Offset of accumulated deficit with share premium

On February 23, 2016, the shareholders voted a resolution to offset the accumulated losses with the legal reserve from
capital contribution for an amount of CHF 30,005,040.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

107

Statutory Financial Statements of ObsEva S.A. for the year ended December 31, 2016

Notes to the Financial Statements 2016 (cont’d)

The changes in the number of treasury non-voting shares owned by the company in 2016 and 2015 are as follows:

(number of treasury non-voting shares)

2016

2015

At 1 January………………………………
Sale of non-voting shares…………………
Purchase of non-voting shares……………

At 31 December………………………….

12. Authorized capital and conditional capital

80,353
(85,618)
10,465

5,200

3,250
—

77,103

80,353

The authorized share capital, authorized non-voting share capital and conditional share capital as at 31 December 2016 and
31 December 2015 are as follows:

(CHF)

31 December 2016

31 December 2015

Authorized share capital………………….
Authorized non-voting share capital……...
Conditional share capital…………………

13. Major Shareholders

891,587
—
—

—

84,384
—

A list of our major shareholders is disclosed in the Corporate Governance section of the Annual Report (page 67).

14. Going concern

The company fulfills its obligations by the use of its cash reserves. The Board of Directors believes the company will be able
to meet all of its obligations for a further 12 months as they fall due and, hence, the financial statements have been prepared
on a going concern basis.

15. Events after the balance sheet date

On 25 January 2017, the company raised USD 96,750,000 in an Initial Public Offering (IPO) on the US Nasdaq stock
exchange. The IPO was closed on 30 January 2017 with the issuance of 6,450,000 new ordinary shares at a subscription price
of USD 15.00 per share and a par value of 1/13 of a Swiss franc per share. All existing preferred « A » shares, preferred « B »
shares and non-voting shares were immediately converted into ordinary shares as of the IPO date.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

108

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

109

ObsEva SA Plan-les-Ouates Report of the statutory auditor to the General Meeting on the financial statements 2016

Statutory Financial Statements of ObsEva S.A. for the year ended December 31, 2016
Report of the Statutory Auditor to the General Meeting

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

110

Report of the statutory auditor to the General Meeting of ObsEva SA Plan-les-Ouates Report on the audit of the financial statements Opinion We have audited the financial statements of ObsEva SA, which comprise the balance sheet as at 31 December 2016, income statement and notes for the year then ended, including a summary of significant accounting policies. In our opinion, the accompanying financial statements as at 31 December 2016 comply with Swiss law and the company’s articles of incorporation. Basis for opinion We conducted our audit in accordance with Swiss law and Swiss Auditing Standards. Our responsibilities under those provisions and standards are further described in the “Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements” section of our report. We are independent of the entity in accordance with the provisions of Swiss law and the requirements of the Swiss audit profession and we have fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. Our audit approach Audit scope We designed our audit by determining materiality and assessing the risks of material misstatement in the financial statements. In particular, we considered where subjective judgements were made; for example, in respect of significant accounting estimates that involved making assumptions and considering future events that are inherently uncertain. As in all of our audits, we also addressed the risk of management override of internal controls, including among other matters consideration of whether there was evidence of bias that represented a risk of material misstatement due to fraud. Materiality The scope of our audit was influenced by our application of materiality. Our audit opinion aims to provide reasonable assurance that the financial statements are free from material misstatement. Misstatements may arise due to fraud or error. They are considered material, if individually or in aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial statements. Based on our professional judgement, we determined certain quantitative thresholds for materiality, including the overall materiality for the financial statements as a whole as set out in the table below. These, together with qualitative considerations, helped us to determine the scope of our audit and the nature, timing and extent of our audit procedures and to evaluate the effect of misstatements, both individually and in aggregate, on the financial statements as a whole.

Statutory Financial Statements of ObsEva S.A. for the year ended December 31, 2016
Report of the Statutory Auditor to the General Meeting

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

111

Overall materiality CHF 299,000 How we determined it Total expenses Rationale for the materiality benchmark applied Profit before tax is not considered an appropriate benchmark as the Company is a start-up, in the developmental phase, and has no recurring revenue. Based on the nature of the Company we deter-mined total expenses as the most appropriate benchmark, applying a 1% rule of thumb. Report on key audit matters based on the circular 1/2015 of the Federal Audit Oversight Authority We have determined that there are no key audit matters to communicate in our report. Responsibilities of the Board of Directors for the financial statements The Board of Directors is responsible for the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with the provisions of Swiss law and the company’s articles of incorporation, and for such internal control as the Board of Directors determines is necessary to enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. In preparing the financial statements, the Board of Directors is responsible for assessing the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting unless the Board of Directors either intends to liquidate the entity or to cease operations, or has no realistic alternative but to do so. Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with Swiss law and Swiss Auditing Standards will always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial statements. As part of an audit in accordance with Swiss law and Swiss Auditing Standards, we exercise professional judgment and maintain professional scepticism throughout the audit. We also: • Identify and assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error, design and perform audit procedures responsive to those risks, and obtain audit evidence that is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of internal control. • Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. • Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates and related disclosures made. Conclude on the appropriateness of the Board of Directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we are required to draw attention in our auditor’s report to the related disclosures in the financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to modify our

Statutory Financial Statements of ObsEva S.A. for the year ended December 31, 2016
Report of the Statutory Auditor to the General Meeting

Michael Foley

Audit expert
Auditor in charge

Geneva, 22 May 2017

Enclosure:

Filippos Mintiloglitis

Audit expert

• Financial statements (balance sheet, income statement and notes)

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

112

• opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the date of our auditor’s report. However, future events or conditions may cause the entity to cease to continue as a going concern. We communicate with the Board of Directors or its relevant committee regarding, among other matters, the planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit. We also provide the Board of Directors or its relevant committee with a statement that we have complied with relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence, and where applicable, related safeguards. From the matters communicated with the Board of Directors or its relevant committee, we determine those matters that were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our auditor’s report unless law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter or when, in extremely rare circumstances, we determine that a matter should not be communicated in our report because the adverse consequences of doing so would reasonably be expected to outweigh the public interest benefits of such communication. Report on other legal and regulatory requirements In accordance with article 728a paragraph 1 item 3 CO and Swiss Auditing Standard 890, we confirm that an internal control system exists which has been designed for the preparation of financial statements according to the instructions of the Board of Directors. We recommend that the financial statements submitted to you be approved. PricewaterhouseCoopers SA

Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements that are based on our management’s beliefs and assumptions and
on information currently available to our management. All statements other than present and historical facts and conditions
contained in this Annual Report, including statements regarding our future results of operations and financial positions,
business strategy, plans and our objectives for future operations, are forward-looking statements. When used in this Annual
Report, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “continue” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may,” “might,” “ongoing,”
“objective,” “plan,” “potential,” “predict,” “should,” “will” and “would,” or the negative of these and similar expressions
identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about:

•

•
•

•
•
•
•
•
•

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

the success, cost, timing and potential indications of our product candidates’ development activities and clinical
trials, including our ongoing and future trials of OBE2109, nolasiban and OBE022;
our ability to obtain and maintain regulatory approval of our product candidates, including OBE2109, nolasiban and
OBE022, in any of the indications for which we plan to develop them, and any related restrictions, limitations or
warnings in the label of an approved product;
the results of ongoing or future clinical trials, including of OBE2109, nolasiban and OBE022;
our ability to obtain funding for our operations, including funding necessary to complete the clinical trials of any of
our product candidates, and the terms on which we are able to raise that additional capital;
our plans to research, develop and commercialize our product candidates;
the timing of our regulatory filings for our product candidates;
the clinical utility of our product candidates;
the size and growth potential of the markets for our product candidates;
our commercialization, marketing and manufacturing capabilities and strategy;
our expectations regarding our ability to obtain and maintain intellectual property protection for our product
candidates and our ability to operate our business without infringing on the intellectual property rights of others;
the timing and amount of milestone and royalty payments we are required to make under our license agreements;
our ability to attract and retain qualified employees and key personnel;
our ability to contract with third-party suppliers and manufacturers and their ability to perform adequately;
the activities of our competitors and the success of competing therapies that are or become available;
our plans to in-license or acquire additional product candidates;
how long we will qualify as an emerging growth company or a foreign private issuer;
our estimates regarding future revenue, expenses and needs for additional financing;
regulatory developments in the United States and foreign countries; and
other risks and uncertainties, including those listed in this section of this Annual Report.

We cannot assure you that the forward-looking statements in this Annual Report will prove to be accurate. Furthermore, if
our forward-looking statements prove to be inaccurate, the inaccuracy may be material. In light of the significant
uncertainties in these forward-looking statements, you should not regard these statements as a representation or warranty by
us or any other person that we will achieve our objectives and plans in any specified time frame or at all. We undertake no
obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or
otherwise, except as required by law.

You should read this Annual Report and the documents that we reference in this Annual Report completely and with the
understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. We qualify all of our forward-
looking statements by these cautionary statements.

This Annual Report contains market data and industry forecasts that were obtained from industry publications. These data
involve a number of assumptions and limitations, and you are cautioned not to give undue weight to such estimates. We
have not independently verified any third-party information. While we believe the market position, market opportunity and
market size information included in this Annual Report is generally reliable, such information is inherently imprecise.

ObsEva S.A. - Annual Report 2016

113

Media Contact:
Liz Bryan
Spectrum Science
lbryan@spectrumscience.com
+1 202-955-6222 x2526

Company Contact:
Delphine Renaud
ObsEva, CEO Office
delphine.renaud@obseva.ch
+41 22 552 1550

Investor Contact:
Mario Corso
Senior Director, Investor Relations
mario.corso@obseva.com
+1 781-366-5726