More annual reports from Oilex:
2020 ReportPeers and competitors of Oilex:
Geopark LtdANNUAL
REPORT 2016
For personal use onlyP.01
Bhandut Production Facility
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyCONTENTS
Chairman’s Review
Business Review
Permit Schedule
Directors’ Report
Remuneration Report - Audited
Lead Auditor’s Independence Declaration
Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss and Other
Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Directors' Declaration
Independent Audit Report
Shareholder Information
Definitions
Corporate Information
P.02
03
05
18
20
25
40
41
42
43
44
45
82
83
85
87
88
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.03
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
CHAIRMAN’S
REVIEW
Dear Shareholder,
The 2016 financial year has been an extremely challenging year for Oilex and its shareholders, resulting in a loss before income tax of
$36 million, primarily affected by non-cash impairment of exploration and development assets of $21.6 million, and reduced recovery
of costs from Joint Ventures and costs associated with the Zeta Resources Limited litigation. Against a back drop of a fifteen-year
low in oil prices, the Company has had to divert much of its attention from the core business of developing value from its assets to
addressing significant joint venture issues in India, costly litigation associated with its last capital raising, and resetting the technical
direction at Cambay, in association with lower than expected production rates at its most recent wells and delays associated with
joint venture funding contribution to ongoing project activities.
Despite these hurdles, the Company continues to be confident in, and committed to unlocking, the multi TCF in-place tight gas
potential in its onshore Cambay Block, Gujarat State in India. To this end, a new vertical well is planned which is essential to
determining the optimal formula to underpin any long term commercial development of the substantial undeveloped gas opportunity
at Cambay. The next phase of the work programme is designed to address the identified technical and operational risks and is aimed
at regaining the momentum behind the Company’s core unconventional gas project at Cambay.
The growth in energy demand in India underpins a strong business case for the Joint Venture partners to the Cambay PSC. India is
home to 18% of the world’s population yet uses only 6% of the world’s primary energy. This is despite its energy consumption having
almost doubled since 2000. Domestic gas production continues to decline with the growing imbalance being filled by the rapid
expansion of LNG imports.
Oilex believes that India has large undeveloped unconventional potential. Limited exploitation, to date, provides a significant
opportunity for the discovery and commercial development of these hydrocarbon resources. Oilex has ten years’ operating
experience in India with a strong local team. Under the revamped leadership team, the Company is focussed on leveraging this
opportunity for the benefit of our stakeholders and partners.
Reflecting the changes in the industry environment and the project status, your Board has made the necessary changes to reposition
Oilex for a strong future. Besides reducing expenditure, the Company has restructured its board and senior executive management
team during the year.
The Company is actively engaged in resolving issues associated with the Cambay joint venture funding requirements, which has
necessitated that as Operator the Company has absorbed certain costs to maintain the viability of this joint venture, while developing
an ongoing strategy to resolve these issues.
On behalf of the Board I wish to record our appreciation for the support of our executive management and staff, Joint Venture
partners, contractors, local communities, shareholders and stakeholders during a difficult year and look forward to unlocking the key
to the sustainable commercialisation of the unconventional hydrocarbon resources within the Cambay project.
Mr MDJ Cozijn
Chairman
29 September 2016
For personal use onlyP.04
Cambay-73 Well Head
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.05
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
BUSINESS
REVIEW
BUSINESS
REVIEW
GLOBAL ECONOMIC
ENVIRONMENT FOR
HYDROCARBONS
Global Oil Supply/Demand
y
a
D
r
e
P
s
l
e
r
r
a
B
n
o
i
l
l
i
M
98
96
94
92
90
88
86
2013
2014
2015
2016
Supply
Demand
Based on IEA data from Oil Market Report © OECD/IEA 2016,
www.iea.org/oilmarketreport/omrpublic; as modified by Oilex Ltd
The global oil and gas industry has been subjected to continuing
challenges brought about by the world wide reduction in oil
and gas prices since late 2014. Oil prices have fallen by around
60%, driven by a supply demand imbalance with supply now
exceeding demand for nine consecutive quarters. The global
LNG supply has seen strong growth with many new liquefaction
trains coming on stream this year at the same time that
traditional buyers are experiencing falling demand. As a result,
the entire oil and gas industry has been under pressure and
very few companies have remained immune to value loss and
project delays. Oilex commissioned a review of peer company
performance between July 2015 and February 2016 which
showed an average loss of 40% in share price over this period.
Oilex’s strategy and day to day operations have been effected
and appropriate responses including cost cutting have been
taken to adjust to the current situation.
Two cost reduction initiatives have been undertaken. The first
was announced in the Company’s March 2016 Quarterly Report
documenting 47% reduction in Indian ongoing operating costs
and 23% reduction in corporate costs. A second measure was
announced on 29 September 2016 documenting an additional
30% cut in Indian personnel costs, a review of commercial
operations at Cambay and Bhandut Fields, and 40% reduction in
personnel costs in Australia. All exploration costs continue to be
deferred. The staff reductions have been undertaken reluctantly
but in response to the general environment. Efforts have been
made to maintain operating capability as far as possible and future
activities will be augmented through contract arrangements
on an as needed basis. The Company’s personnel, excluding
non-executive directors, after restructure, consists of 22 full time
equivalent (FTE) people in India and 7 FTE in Australia.
For personal use only
P.06
BUSINESS
REVIEW
OILEX
STRATEGY
Within the context of the sector’s global
difficulties, Oilex has continued to focus on its
projects in the Indian upstream gas industry
where demand for hydrocarbons continues to rise
within a strong domestic economy seeing GDP
growth rates over the last 2 years in excess of
7%. In 2015, India was the world’s third largest
energy consumer with an increasing imbalance
in gas demand over supply. India’s domestic gas
production, which declined 3.8% in 2015, falls
short of requirements, and is supplemented by
international LNG imports. These increased by
15% in 2015 and only partially fill the supply-
demand gap. India’s demand for natural gas is
predicted to rise annually by approximately 5%.
Figure 1: Jayant Sethi (centre) with Oilex Staff
INTRODUCTION
Oilex’s principal project is the Cambay Project located onshore
in the state of Gujarat in the heart of one of India’s most
prolific hydrocarbon provinces. In this area, the presence of
hydrocarbons is proven from a long history of drilling and
production and infrastructure is already present on a large scale.
Along with its Joint Venture partner, Gujarat State Petroleum
Corporation Limited (GSPC), Oilex as operator has worked in
this area since 2005 and the Joint Venture has discovered and
produced both oil and gas from a number of geological horizons.
Current efforts centre on the application of horizontal drilling
technologies developed in the hugely successful unconventional
hydrocarbon resources boom in North America in recent years.
Oilex continues to believe that India’s domestic gas industry has
enormous potential for similar success, by adapting the North
American experience to the Indian hydrocarbon industry and that
this approach is only in its infancy. The successful development of
unconventional gas fields will provide India with a real opportunity
to offset LNG imports and to rejuvenate its domestic industry.
The Cambay Project is ideally located at a hub of India’s large
gas distribution network and approximately 10 km from the
existing national gas pipeline grid and is already connected to
the low pressure local market. The project is well-positioned to
commercialise production in the fast-growing, demand-driven
domestic energy market.
Oilex’s capability in gas field developments was demonstrated
with the testing and marketing of gas from the Cambay asset,
and in a small conventional project called Bhandut, where a single
well production facility was successfully placed on stream.
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.07
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
BUSINESS
REVIEW
CAMBAY FIELD
Onshore Gujarat, India
OILEX
INTEREST
China
45%
OPERATOR
Pakistan
New Delhi
Arabian Sea
Mumbai
I N D I A
Hyderabad
Nepal
Bhutan
Bangladesh
Kolkata
Bangalore
Chennai
Bay of Bengal
Sources: U.S. Energy Information Administration
IHS Edin, USGS
0
250
500 Kilometers
Figure 2: Gujarat Gas Pipeline Network to the Nation
Oilex is the Operator of the Cambay Field Production Sharing
Contract (PSC) in the Cambay Basin onshore Gujarat, India
and holds a 45% participating interest. The remaining 55%
interest is held by Joint Venture partner, Gujarat State Petroleum
Corporation Limited.
The 161 km2 Cambay PSC area contains multiple target horizons
for oil and gas. Past production had been established from
shallower conventional reservoirs predominantly producing oil
in shallower Miocene Basal Sand reservoirs and predominantly
wet gas from the Oligocene OS-II reservoir.
The Cambay Basin is one of the most prolific hydrocarbon basins
in India. Exploration started in the 1950’s and hydrocarbon
production and observations in many wells validate a rich
petroleum system with proven prolific source rocks. The basin
lies within one of India’s main industrial regions and is India’s
largest centre of heavy industry. Extensive infrastructure
connects producing fields to local industries and other major
centres as far north as Delhi.
The current focus is on deeper unconventional (tight) Eocene
reservoirs which are known to be gas charged and referred to
as the EP-III/IV or X and Y Zones. The application of recently
developed North American drilling and stimulation techniques
aimed at commercial production from these targets is still at a
very early stage. The following map shows the EP-IV (Y Zone)
hydrocarbon flows from wells within the Cambay PSC.
For personal use onlyP.08
BUSINESS
REVIEW
and appearing at surface during the drilling operation. It was
stimulated but production could not be established due to
downhole equipment failures which could not be rectified. The
second well, Cambay-77H drilled in 2014, was successfully
placed on production during the year at flow rates lower than
anticipated after reservoir stimulation. The results of these two
wells served to confirm the wide-spread presence of wet gas
saturated, low permeability siltstones that were encountered in
the older vertical wells.
In order to determine the optimal drilling and stimulation
procedures required to provide higher flow rates from this
siltstone section, core samples must be acquired, then analysed
by laboratories experienced in providing the solutions for
unconventional development. The focus of the next well to
be drilled in the Cambay Field will be to acquire the core data
which will provide the basis for selecting optimal drilling and
completion technologies for future development wells.
Modest levels of oil, gas and condensate production occurred
throughout the year from 11 wells producing approximately
4,408 bbl of oil and condensate and 62 MMscf of gas. The wells
produce either from the OS-II or the EP-IV or Y Zone with the
latter providing most of the production. Two of these wells,
Cambay-73 and Cambay-77H provided the bulk of the volume
and produced gas with condensate. Production and pressure
data from the wells provide an important understanding of
reservoir performance. The two wells are about 2 km apart and
the well fluid is piped to a gathering station at the Cambay-73
location where the separated gas enters a low pressure
distribution pipeline servicing domestic gas demand.
During the year, the wells were at times shut-in while waiting for
government approvals to continue test gas production, and have
recently been shut-in, awaiting such approval.
1603
1650
1700
1750
1800
1850
1900
1950
2000
2050
0
1200
2000
Metres
Cambay Field Top Y Zone
2150
(155 Horizon) Depth Map c.i.10m 2169
2100
Figure 3: Cambay Field – recorded hydrocarbon flowrates from
EP-IV (Y Zone) reservoir
The Oilex operated Joint Venture has drilled two horizontal wells
which were multi-stage stimulated (Cambay-76H and Cambay-
77H). The drilling of these two wells represents the beginning
of the learning curve associated with adapting North American
technology to the specifics of the Cambay Basin geology.
The first well Cambay-76H spudded in 2011 was successfully
drilled with hydrocarbons confirmed in the reservoir section
Figure 4: Cambay-73 Production Facility
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.09
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
BUSINESS
REVIEW
The Government of India approved its Policy for the Grant of
Extension to the Production Sharing Contracts (Policy) to small
and medium fields in March 2016, listing the Cambay Field in the
annexure. Applications are due at least two years in advance of
the PSC expiry date. The Policy includes the following
pre-requisites for evaluation:
»
»
»
»
the area must have a valid mining lease on the date
of application;
the area must have commenced test / commercial production;
the area covered by the development plan has been
submitted to the Management Committee for approval, and
be subject to approval of such;
the Contractor should be able to demonstrate recoverable
reserves by submitting a third party reserves report with the
extension application; and
»
the revised field development plan is required to be submitted.
Subject to the success of the planned work programme,
inclusive of the vertical well, the Company anticipates lodging
its Field Development Plan in late 2017 in support of its
PSC extension application. The application for extension,
including final terms and conditions, is at the discretion of the
Government of India.
JOINT VENTURE MANAGEMENT
Oilex’s Joint Venture partner in the Cambay PSC is Gujarat
State Petroleum Corporation Limited. At the end of June 2016,
unpaid cash calls issued to GSPC and going back several years
totalled approximately US$6.5 million. Between July 2015 and
August 2016 the Company received payments from GSPC
totalling approximately US$0.76 million in relation to Cambay
and approximately US$0.48 million in relation to Bhandut. Oilex
continues to engage with its Joint Venture partner to resolve the
unpaid cash calls and to obtain a commitment to participate in
future activities or to find an alternative solution so that a work
programme to progress the Field can take place.
Oilex, as operator, continues to bear the ongoing costs of the
Joint Venture and has managed payment of the Cambay Joint
Venture creditors.
Negotiations on a work programme and budget acceptable to
the Joint Venture partner for Cambay Field are ongoing. Early
in the 2016 calendar year Oilex submitted a reduced work
programme and budget for the Cambay Project for the Indian
financial year starting 1 April 2016. This work programme
and budget concentrated primarily on maintenance of the
asset; however, it is yet to be approved by the Joint Venture.
Subsequent to the reporting period, the Company has submitted
a revised work programme and budget to the Joint Venture for
approval, inclusive of the planned new vertical well with the dual
objective of appraising an area of un-depleted OS-II reservoir
and obtaining core samples of the EP-IV zone. Analysis of the
core will determine the optimal technologies for commercial
development of unconventional gas resource known to be
in place. In the absence of a timely and mutually acceptable
approval by the Joint Venture, the Company may elect (subject
to availability of funds) to sole fund the programme with the
objective of progressing production from the Cambay Field. The
Cambay PSC primary term expires in September 2019, and the
Joint Venture has the possibility of applying for an extension of
up to 10 years, such that the PSC could be extended to 2029
or economic life of the field, whichever is earlier, subject to
submission of a field development plan and complying with
other PSC extension criteria. There are no outstanding work
commitments on the PSC before the term expires.
For personal use onlyP.10
BUSINESS
REVIEW
RESERVES AND CONTINGENT RESOURCES
In April 2015, the Company tabled reserve and contingent resource volumes associated with the EP-III/IV (X and Y Zones) resulting
from a review undertaken by third party certifier RISC. Since that time, a number of key factors have changed including:
i) economic assumptions related to lower gas prices being realised because of the global fall in oil and gas prices;
ii) Oilex’s Joint Venture partner’s lack of approval of ongoing work programmes and budgets; and
iii) the resultant deferral in project timing which extends the recovery of reserves to beyond the current term of the PSC. Note that
the Company can apply for a PSC extension of 10 years.
On this basis, RISC has recommended that the reserve volumes be re-classified to contingent resources. It should be noted that the
volume of hydrocarbons has not been amended. The updated recoverable hydrocarbon volumes are tabulated below.
At April 2015
At June 2016
Reserves
Y Zone
At April 2015
At June 2016
Contingent
Resources
X & Y
Zones
Net Gas Volume
bcf
Net Condensate Volume
million bbl
1P
Nil
Nil
1C
215
215
2P
93
Nil
2C
324
417
3P
170
Nil
3C
558
728
1P
Nil
Nil
1C
12
12
2P
3.6
Nil
2C
23.8
27.4
3P
7.8
Nil
3C
46.8
54.6
Table shows Oilex Net Working Interest Reserves and Contingent Resources
Reserves in Y Zone have been reclassified Contingent Resources
Refer to ASX announcement dated 24 June 2016 for further details
The Company notes that previously announced production profiles and other forward looking statements based upon the previous
reserve volumes are no longer current and shareholders and investors are urged to exercise caution in basing any investment
decisions on such information.
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use only
P.11
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
BUSINESS
REVIEW
RESERVES AND CONTINGENT RESOURCES RECONCILIATION BY PERIOD
Reserves
Cambay India
Y Zone
Total - Gross 30/06/2015
Recognition of new reserves
Reclassification of reserves to
contingent resources June 2016
Acquisitions and divestments
Production
Total - Gross 30/06/2016
Oilex net working interest
Estimated Cambay Field Reserves
1P Undeveloped
2P Undeveloped
3P
Gas
Bcf
Nil
C5
MMbbls
Nil
-
-
-
-*
Nil
Nil
-
-
-
-*
Nil
Nil
Gas
Bcf
206
-
(206)
-
-*
Nil
Nil
C5
MMbbls
8.0
-
(8.0)
-
-*
Nil
Nil
Gas
Bcf
377
-
C5
MMbbls
17.3
-
(377)
(17.3)
-
-*
Nil
Nil
-
-*
Nil
Nil
*Actual Cambay Field production in the year ended 30 June 2016 was 4,408 bbls and 62 MMscf (gross), net to Oilex 1,983 bbls
and 28 MMscf. Production for the period 1 July to 30 June 2016 has been excluded from the table above as these amounts are
immaterial relative to total Reserves and Oilex net working interest.
Contingent Resources
Cambay India
X and Y Zones
Total - Gross 30/06/2015
Reclassification of reserves to
contingent resources June 2016
Total - X and Y Zones Gross 30/06/2016
Oilex net working interest
Unrisked Cambay Field Contingent Resource Estimates
1C
2C
3C
Gas
Bcf
C5+
MMbbls
478**
26.7**
-
478
215
-
26.7
12.0
Gas
Bcf
C5+
MMbbls
720
206
926
417
52.8
8.0
60.8
27.4
Gas
Bcf
1239
377
1616
728
C5+
MMbbls
104.0
17.3
121.3
54.6
**Includes gross contingent resources of 90 Bcf of gas and 3 MMbbls of C5+ as announced on 16 April 2015.
For personal use onlyP.12
BUSINESS
REVIEW
BHANDUT FIELD
Onshore Gujarat, India
OILEX
INTEREST
40%
OPERATOR
45% has occurred and water gas ratio (WGR) has increased to 230
bbl/MMscf at year end. Subsequent to year end, gas production
rates have remained low and water production has increased. The
field operations remain under review.
The Joint Venture partner GSPC has approved the Work Programme
and Budget for the Bhandut Field for the Indian financial year
starting 1 April 2016. GSPC payments on cash calls are largely up to
date with approximately US$215,000 outstanding.
In September 2016, the mining lease for Bhandut was extended
for a period of three years till September 2019.
Oilex N.L. Holdings (India) Limited is the Operator of the
Bhandut Field Production Sharing Contract (PSC) in the Cambay
Basin onshore Gujarat, India and holds a 40% participating
interest. The remaining 60% interest is held by Joint Venture
partner Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation Limited.
The Bhandut Field was initially discovered and developed by
ONGC in 1976. Oilex has produced 28,093 bbl of oil since the
time of taking over the field in 2006.
In 2012 Oilex and GSPC carried out a production workover
to perforate an interpreted gas-saturated sandstone in the
Bhandut-3 well to address the potential for development. The
workover was successful and the well flowed at a maximum
rate of 6.5 MMscfd through a 10 mm choke with a flowing
tubing head pressure of 1,190 psia from this sandstone during
an isochronal test. The reservoir sands are good quality with a
permeability of 124 mD. The produced gas is dry gas with 96%
methane and requires minimal treatment.
During the year, Oilex completed the construction of a gas
production and handling facility. A third party gas purchaser
provided the off-take pipeline which connects the gas into the
grid after compression at the third party facility. Gas production
commenced on 6 April 2016. Since that time the well has been on
continuous production. At the end of June 2016 about 46 MMscf
of gas and 164 bbl of condensate had been produced. A decline of
Figure 5: Bhandut Production Facility
SABARMATI FIELD
Onshore Gujarat, India
OILEX
INTEREST
40%
OPERATOR
The Sabarmati Field Petroleum Mining Lease expired on 22
September 2014. The formal field relinquishment process has
been confirmed by the Directorate General of Hydrocarbons
(DGH) and final confirmation of the PSC cancellation by
Government of India was received on 26 August 2016.
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.13
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
BUSINESS
REVIEW
CANNING BASIN
Western Australia
Oilex currently holds exploration permit application STP-EPA-0131, and has “preferred applicant” status for two adjacent exploration
areas, STP-EPA-0106 and STP-EPA-0107 in the onshore Canning Basin, Western Australia. The combined total area is ~3 million acres.
The acreage is adjacent to many world class mining projects in the Pilbara region. The Great Northern Highway runs through the
northern area and the Telfer Gas Pipeline traverses STP-EPA-0131 (Figure 6).
North West Shelf Gas Project
No. of trains: 5
Capacity: 16.3 MMt/a
2014 Phoenix South-1
300MM bbls oil in place
Wheatstone LNG Development
No. of trains: 2
Capacity: 25 MMt/a
Port Hedland
Largest bulk minerals export port in the world
Exported >370,000,000 tonnes (2014)
98% iron ore – mostly to China
Liquid hydrocarbons handling capacity
Port Hedland
Gorgon LNG Development
No. of trains: 3
Capacity: 15 MMt/a
Dampier
Karratha
STP-EPA-0106
STP-EPA-0107
STP-EPA-0131
Yarrie
Griffin Offshore Pipeline
Onslow
Pannawonica
Nifty
Telfer
LEGEND
Pipeline
Rail
Coastline
Oilex Permits
Newman
Jimblebar
0
20
40
60
80 100
Kilometers
Tom Price
Paraburdoo
Figure 6: Significant infrastructure within and adjacent to Oilex’s Wallal Graben permits
The U.S. EIA identified the Canning Basin as having the largest
unconventional potential in Australia. The exploration areas cover
the prospective Wallal Graben.
Coastline
Oilex Permits
For personal use only
P.14
BUSINESS
REVIEW
Prospectivity
The three permit areas cover the full onshore extent of the
undrilled Wallal half graben located in the south-west Canning
Basin. Data coverage, until recently, comprised only low
resolution gravity/magnetic data and sparse vintage 2D seismic
data of variable quality. Oilex’s technical work identified the
possibility of a deeper and more extensive half graben system
which was subsequently confirmed through the acquisition of an
Oilex-funded airborne gravity and magnetic survey.
Multiple play-types including structural and stratigraphic (fan
systems visible on seismic data) plays have been identified.
It is envisaged that a single vertical well could test multiple
targets. Unconventional resource plays are likely to exist within
the organic shales interpreted to exist by analogy with the
greater Canning Basin. At various geological periods, the Wallal
Graben potentially had only a limited connection with the ocean,
resulting in very rich source rocks being deposited. That said,
source rock presence remains the primary risk in the area and
Oilex has been investigating some novel technologies which
may provide a de-risking tool.
Grant of the permits requires negotiation with traditional
owner groups and Oilex has agreed terms and executed
Heritage Protection Agreements in respect of the two northern
blocks. Oilex is also in discussion with the Western Australian
Government regarding work programmes. The process of the
formal offer of Exploration Permits for each area will proceed
upon finalisation of all agreements, at which time Oilex can elect
whether to accept the offer.
0
20
40
60
80
100
KILOMETRES
Figure 7: Interpretation of the Wallal Graben extent overlain on the
magnetic depth to basement horizon (meters relative to sea level).
Prospect
S
S
Figure 8: Example of structural
lead - simple tilted fault
block with stacked overlying
channel. Two interpreted
unconventional (source rock)
plays are also shown.
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.15
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
BUSINESS
REVIEW
JPDA 06-103
Timor Sea
OILEX
INTEREST
10%
OPERATOR
The Joint Venture submitted a request to the Autoridade
Nacional do Petroleo e Minerais (ANPM) to terminate the PSC
by mutual agreement in accordance with its terms and without
penalty or claim on 12 July 2013 (Request to Terminate).
The Request to Terminate followed Joint Venture concerns over
the security of PSC tenure as a result of developments within
the JPDA, including JPDA 06-103, which are outside the control
and influence of the Joint Venture Participants, including:
»
»
existence of separate unilateral rights to terminate the
Certain Maritime Arrangements in the Timor Sea (CMATS)
arising in 2013 in favour of both the Government of Timor
Leste and the Government of Australia; and
formal arbitration proceedings being initiated by the Timor
Leste Government against the Government of Australia to
have CMATS declared void ab initio.
On 15 January 2014 the ANPM suspended the PSC for 3
months to provide sufficient time for a response to the Request
to Terminate be determined. The ANPM subsequently granted
successive 3 month extensions to the PSC.
In May 2015 the ANPM responded to the Joint Venture and
advised that the Request to Terminate had been rejected.
Shortly thereafter, the Joint Venture received a Notice of Intent
to Terminate the PSC (Notice) from the ANPM.
The Notice asserts a monetary claim against the Joint Venture
for payment of the estimated cost of exploration activities not
carried out in 2013 and certain local content obligations set
out in the PSC. The total amount sought to be recovered by
the ANPM in the Notice is approximately US$17 million. The
obligations and liabilities of the Joint Venture participants under
the PSC are joint and several.
The Joint Venture has previously requested credit for excess
expenditure on the approved work programme in the amount
of circa US$56 million and this issue remains unresolved.
The Notice does not include any reference to, nor allowance
for, credit for excess monies which have been spent by the
Joint Venture during the PSC term. Oilex considers such
excess expenditure should be included as part of any financial
assessment incorporated in the termination process.
During the financial year, the ANPM issued the Notice of
Termination of the PSC JPDA 06-103 effective 15 July 2015.
The Joint Venture continues to discuss any financial liabilities
which may arise from the termination of the PSC with the ANPM.
In the event the parties are unable to reach an amicable settlement,
any party may refer the matter to arbitration, however the ANPM
may only do so with the unanimous consent of each of the Joint
Commissioners (two of whom are appointed by the Timor Leste
Government and the other by the Australian Government).
The equity interest of the Joint Venture participants are:
Oilex (JPDA 06-103) Ltd
Pan Pacific Petroleum (JPDA 06-103) Pty Ltd
Japan Energy E&P JPDA Pty Ltd
GSPC (JPDA) Limited *
Videocon JPDA 06-103 Limited *
Bharat PetroResources JPDA Ltd *
Total
10%
15%
15%
20%
20%
20%
100%
The Joint Venture is presently being conducted in accordance
with a care and maintenance budget.
* Presently three participants have agreed to remit the balance
of outstanding cash calls, which total US$235,914.
WEST KAMPAR PSC
Central Sumatra
OILEX
INTEREST
45%
+ FURTHER 22.5% SECURED - NON OPERATOR
Oilex continues to pursue a commercial resolution to the Joint
Venture dispute with the Operator in the West Kampar PSC, in
parallel with considering options to enforce its Arbitration Award
in Jakarta. The Pendalian Field which lies within the PSC has been
managed outside of the terms of the JOA and funded by the
Operator with no accounting of any production revenues to Oilex.
Following application by a creditor, the Commercial Court in
Jakarta appointed an Administrator and implemented a scheme
of arrangement to repay creditors over a 10 year period. As this
scheme excluded Oilex’s claim, Oilex has commenced legal
action to recover the balance of the arbitration award and to
ensure its interests are protected.
The carrying value of this investment was reduced to nil in 2012
pending resolution of this matter.
For personal use onlyP.16
BUSINESS
REVIEW
FINANCIAL
Treasury policy
The funding requirements of the Group are reviewed on a regular
basis by the Group’s Chief Financial Officer and reported to the
Board to ensure the Group is able to meet its financial obligations
as and when they fall due. Internal cash flow models are used to
review and to test investment decisions. Until sufficient operating
cash flows are generated from its operations, the Group remains
reliant on equity or debt funding, as well as assets divestiture or
farmouts to fund its expenditure commitments.
Formal control over the Group’s activities is maintained through
a budget and cash flow monitoring process with annual budgets
considered in detail by the Board and forming the basis of the
Company’s strategy.
Cash flows are tested under various scenarios to ensure
that expenditure commitments are able to be met under all
reasonably likely scenarios. Expenditures are also carefully
monitored against budget.
The Company continues to actively develop funding options in
order that it can meet its expenditure commitments (refer note 26
of the consolidated financial statements) and its’ planned future
discretionary expenditure.
As at 30 June 2016 the Group had no loan borrowings.
CORPORATE
During the financial year, Oilex announced a two tranche placement
and underwritten rights issue to raise $30 million (Capital Raising).
The Capital Raising comprised the following components:
»
»
»
»
First tranche placement raising $1.8 million, completed
in July 2015;
Fully underwritten rights issue raising $7.0 million,
completed in August 2015;
Second tranche placement raising $11.8 million, completed
in August 2015; and
An agreement with Zeta Resources Limited (Zeta) to issue
deferred shares and convertible notes to raise $9.4 million to
be settled by 12 November 2015.
Zeta failed to settle the subscription for the deferred shares
and the convertible notes and commenced legal action on or
about 12 November 2015 against the Company in the Federal
Court of Australia. On 16 December 2015 the Company filed its
defence in the Federal Court proceedings initiated by Zeta. The
Company also filed a cross-claim against Zeta seeking orders of
specific performance requiring Zeta to perform its obligations
and complete the relevant share subscription and convertible
note agreements (or otherwise pay damages to the Company).
The parties established standstill periods before reaching a
settlement that ended the legal proceedings. The terms of the
settlement were that each party will no longer pursue its claim
against the other, with the legal proceedings to be dismissed on
a no admission of liability basis. Oilex agreed to make a payment
to Zeta on account of costs of the litigation of $490,000.
In reaching this settlement with Zeta, Oilex has taken into
account the significant costs and inherent uncertainty of
litigation, and the substantial time commitments and distraction
that the litigation presents for the board and management.
As at 30 June 2016 the Company had:
»
Available cash resources of $5.16 million;
» No loans or borrowings;
»
Issued capital of 1,180,426,999 fully paid ordinary shares; and
» Unlisted options of 20,250,000.
The Company has dual listing on the ASX and on the Alternative
Investment Market (AIM) of the London Stock Exchange, where
approximately 55% of the Company’s shares are domiciled.
EXECUTIVE AND BOARD CHANGES
On 18 November 2015 Mr Sundeep Bhandari withdrew
his nomination to stand for re-election as a Director of the
Company and advised that he would retire at the close of the 25
November 2015 Annual General Meeting (AGM). Shareholders
at the AGM did not re-elect Mr Jeffrey Auld, and as a result,
the Company needed to appoint a new director to satisfy its
obligation under the Corporations Act to have a minimum of
three directors. The Company announced the appointment of Mr
Jonathan Salomon as an Independent Non-Executive Director of
the Company effective 29 November 2015.
On 11 February 2016 the Company announced the appointment
of Mr Brad Lingo as an Independent Non-Executive Director.
On 18 March 2016 the Company announced the appointment of
Mr Jonathan Salomon as the Managing Director of the Company
following the resignation of Mr Ron Miller.
On 10 June 2016, the Company announced the appointment
of Mr Mark Bolton as Chief Financial Officer and Company
Secretary. Mr Mark Bolton replaced Mr Christopher Bath as CFO
and Company Secretary following his resignation on 24 May 2016.
The Board continues to review the Board composition with a
view to attaining best corporate governance requirements while
being cognisant of the need to conserve the cash resources of
the group during this constrained economic environment for the
hydro carbon industry globally.
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.17
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
BUSINESS
REVIEW
RISK MANAGEMENT
HEALTH, SAFETY, SECURITY AND ENVIRONMENT
Up until March 2016, the Audit and Risk Committee was
responsible for the Group’s internal financial control system
and the Company’s risk management framework. From March
2016, the full board consisting of three directors oversaw these
responsibilities. Management of business risk, particularly
exploration, development and operational risk is essential for
success in the oil & gas business. The Group manages risk
through a formal risk identification and risk management system.
Policy
Oilex is committed to protecting the health and safety of
everybody who plays a part in our operations or lives in the
communities where we operate. Wherever we operate, we will
conduct our business with respect and care for both the local
and global, natural and social environment and systematically
manage risks to drive sustainable business growth. We will
strive to eliminate all injuries, occupational illness, unsafe
practise and incidents of environmental harm from our activities.
The safety and health of our workforce and our environment
stewardship are just as important to our success as operational
and financial performance and the reputation of the Company.
Oilex respects the diversity of cultures and customs that
it encounters and endeavours to incorporate business
practices that accommodate such diversity and that have a
beneficial impact through our working involvement with local
communities. We strive to make our facilities safer and better
places in which to work and our attention to detail and focus
on safety, environmental, health and security issues will help
to ensure high standards of performance. We are committed to
a process of continuous improvement in all we do and to the
adoption of international industry standards and codes wherever
practicable. Through implementation of these principles, Oilex
seeks to earn the public’s trust and to be recognised as a
responsible corporate citizen.
Qualified Petroleum Reserves and Resources Evaluator Statement
Pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 5 of the ASX Listing Rules, the information in this report relating to petroleum reserves and resources
is based on and fairly represents information and supporting documentation prepared by or under the supervision of Mr Peter Bekkers, Chief
Geoscientist employed by Oilex Ltd. Mr Bekkers has over 20 years’ experience in petroleum geology and is a member of the Society of Petroleum
Engineers and AAPG. Mr Bekkers meets the requirements of a qualified petroleum reserve and resource evaluator under Chapter 5 of the ASX
Listing Rules and consents to the inclusion of this information in this report in the form and context in which it appears. Mr Bekkers also meets the
requirements of a qualified person under the AIM Note for Mining, Oil and Gas Companies and consents to the inclusion of this information in this
report in the form and context in which it appears.
For personal use onlyP.18
PERMIT
SCHEDULE
PERMIT
SCHEDULE
AS AT 30 JUNE 2016
ASSET
LOCATION
Cambay Field PSC
Gujarat, India
ENTITY
Oilex Ltd
Oilex N.L. Holdings (India) Limited
EQUITY %
OPERATOR
30.0
15.0
Oilex Ltd
Bhandut Field PSC
Gujarat, India
Oilex N.L. Holdings (India) Limited
40.0
Oilex N.L. Holdings (India) Limited
Sabarmati Field PSC (1)
Gujarat, India
Oilex N.L. Holdings (India) Limited
40.0
Oilex N.L. Holdings (India) Limited
West Kampar PSC
Sumatra, Indonesia
Oilex (West Kampar) Limited
67.5 (2)
PT Sumatera Persada Energi
JPDA 06-103 PSC
Joint Petroleum
Development Area
Timor Leste & Australia
Oilex (JPDA 06-103) Ltd
10.0
Oilex (JPDA 06-103) Ltd
STP-EPA-0131
Western Australia
Admiral Oil Pty Ltd (3)
100.0
Admiral Oil Pty Ltd (3)
STP-EPA-0106
Western Australia
STP-EPA-0107
Western Australia
Admiral Oil and Gas
(106) Pty Ltd (3)
Admiral Oil and Gas
(107) Pty Ltd (3)
100.0 (4)
100.0 (4)
Admiral Oil and Gas
(106) Pty Ltd (3)
Admiral Oil and Gas
(107) Pty Ltd (3)
(1) Sabarmati Field relinquishment proposal has been submitted to the Government of India (GOI) and accepted. Formal approval for
the cancellation of the Sabarmati Field PSC was received from the GOI on 26 August 2016.
(2) Oilex (West Kampar) Limited is entitled to have assigned an additional 22.5% to its holding through the exercise of its rights
under a Power of Attorney granted by PT Sumatera Persada Energi (SPE) following the failure of SPE to repay funds due. The
assignment request has been provided to BPMigas (now SKKMigas) but has not yet been approved or rejected. If Oilex is paid
the funds due it will not be entitled to also pursue this assignment.
(3) Ultimate parent entity is Oilex Ltd.
(4) Current status is a Preferred Applicant.
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.19
2016 FINANCIAL REPORT
CONTENTS
Directors’ Report
Remuneration Report - Audited
Lead Auditor’s Independence Declaration
Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss
and Other Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Directors' Declaration
Independent Audit Report
Shareholder Information
20
25
40
41
42
43
44
45
82
83
85
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.20
DIRECTORS’
REPORT
For the year ended 30 June 2016
Mr Jonathan Salomon
The directors present their report (including the Remuneration
Report) together with the consolidated financial statements
of the Group comprising of Oilex Ltd (the Company) and its
subsidiaries for the financial year ended 30 June 2016 and the
auditors’ report thereon.
(Managing Director - appointed 18 March 2016)
(Non-Executive Director - appointed 29 November 2015 to
17 March 2016)
B App Sc (Geology), GAICD
DIRECTORS
The directors of the Company at any time during or since the
end of the financial year are:
Mr Max Cozijn
(Non-Executive Chairman)
BCom CPA MAICD
Chairman since the Company listed on the Australian Securities
Exchange (ASX) in 2003, having been the founding director
of Oilex Ltd. Mr Cozijn has a Bachelor of Commerce degree
from the University of Western Australia, is a member of CPA
Australia and is a member of the Australian Institute of Company
Directors. Mr Cozijn has over 35 years of experience in the
administration of listed mining and industrial companies and is
the Non-Executive Chairman of Jacka Resources Limited and is
a director of various private companies.
During the last three years Mr Cozijn has been a director of the
following listed companies:
»
»
Jacka Resources Limited (from May 2014 to current)
Energia Minerals Limited (from May 1997 to June 2016)
» Malagasy Minerals Limited (from September 2006 to
Mr Salomon was appointed as a Non-Executive Director in
November 2015 and Managing Director on 18 March 2016. Mr
Salomon has over 30 years of experience working for upstream
energy companies. Further details of Mr Salomon’s qualifications
and experience can be found in the Executive Management
section of the Directors’ Report.
During the last three years Mr Salomon has not been a director
of any other listed companies.
Mr Sundeep Bhandari
(Non-Executive Vice Chairman - until 25 November 2015)
BCom
Mr Bhandari was appointed as a Director (Vice Chairman) in
November 2011. Mr Bhandari has over 32 years of business
experience in India, of which more than 22 years have been
in the energy business working with Cairn Energy, Mobil,
Marathon, ENI, PGS and Command Petroleum. Mr Bhandari is
also a director and shareholder of India Hydrocarbons Ltd.
Mr Bhandari retired at the Annual General Meeting (AGM) on
25 November 2015.
During the last three years, up to the date of his resignation, Mr
Bhandari has not been a director of any other listed companies.
August 2013)
Mr Jeffrey Auld
»
Carbon Energy Limited (from September 1992 to April 2015)
(Non-Executive Director - until 25 November 2015)
Mr Bradley Lingo
MBA BA (Econ)
(Non-Executive Director - appointed 11 February 2016)
Bachelor of Arts with Honours, Juris Doctorate, MAICD
Mr Lingo was appointed as a Non-Executive Director in
February 2016. Mr Lingo has more than 30 years of experience
in a diverse range of oil and gas leadership roles, including
business development, new ventures, mergers and acquisitions
and corporate finance. Mr Lingo has worked with Tenneco
Energy and El Paso Corporation in the US and Australia, the
Commonwealth Bank of Australia and Drillsearch Energy
Limited. He is currently the Managing Director and CEO of Elk
Petroleum Limited.
During the last three years Mr Lingo has been a director of the
following listed companies:
»
Elk Petroleum Limited (from August 2015 to current)
» Drillsearch Energy Limited (from May 2009 to July 2015)
»
»
Acer Energy Limited (from November 2012 to July 2015)
Ambassador Oil and Gas Limited (from August 2014 to
July 2015)
Mr Auld was appointed as a UK based Director in January
2015. Mr Auld has over 25 years of experience in the oil and
gas sector, focused on financial and commercial management
in upstream oil and gas development. Mr Auld’s experience
includes corporate and commercial management in exploration
and production companies. Mr Auld currently is a director of AIM
listed Lansdowne Oil and Gas plc. Mr Auld was not re-elected at
the Annual General Meeting on 25 November 2015.
During the last three years Mr Auld, up to the date of his
resignation, has not been a director of any other listed companies.
Mr Ronald Miller
(Managing Director - resigned 18 March 2016)
MSc Engineering and BSc Ocean Engineering, MAICD (Retired
Chartered Engineer)
Initially appointed as a Non-Executive Director in July 2009,
Mr Miller was appointed Managing Director on 1 January 2013.
A chartered professional engineer (1989 - 2011), Mr Miller has
more than 40 years of experience in the international petroleum
industry. Mr Miller resigned from the Board in March 2016.
During the last three years, up to the date of his resignation,
Mr Miller has not been a director of any other listed companies.
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.21
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
DIRECTORS’
REPORT
COMPANY SECRETARIES
Mr Mark Bolton B Bus was appointed Company Secretary on 10 June 2016.
Mr Cathal Smith LLB, LLM, MBA was appointed interim Company Secretary on 24 May 2016 until 25 August 2016 and consults as
Legal Counsel and Commercial Manager.
Mr Chris Bath CA MAICD was Company Secretary and Chief Financial Officer from 24 October 2014 until his resignation on 24 May 2016.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE STATEMENT
The Corporate Governance Statement, which reports on Oilex’s key governance principles and practices is available on the Oilex website.
In establishing its corporate governance framework, the Company has referred to the recommendations set out in the ASX Corporate
Governance Council’s Corporate Governance Principles and Recommendations 3rd edition. The Company has followed each
recommendation where the Board has considered the recommendation to be an appropriate benchmark for its corporate governance
practices. Where the Company’s corporate governance practices follow a recommendation, the Board has made appropriate
statements reporting on the adoption of the recommendation. In compliance with the “if not, why not” reporting regime, where,
after due consideration, the Company’s corporate governance practices do not follow a recommendation, the Board has explained its
reasons for not following the recommendation and disclosed what, if any, alternative practices the Company has adopted instead of
those in the recommendation.
The Corporate Governance Statement provides detailed information on the Board and committee structure, diversity and risk management.
DIRECTORS’ MEETINGS
Directors in office, committee membership and directors’ attendance at meetings during the 2015/16 financial year are as follows:
M D J Cozijn
B Lingo (3)
J Salomon (4)
S Bhandari (5)
J D Auld (6)
R L Miller (7)
Board
Meetings
Audit and Risk
Committee Meetings (1)
Remuneration and Nomination
Committee Meetings (1)
Held (2)
Attended
Held (2)
Attended
Held (2)
Attended
18
9
11
7
7
14
18
9
11
6
7
13
1
-
-
1
1
-
1
-
-
1
1
1(8)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(1) Please refer to the Corporate Governance Statement on the Oilex website for details of the changes to the composition of the
Committees during the financial year, following the changes to the Board at the Annual General Meeting on 25 November 2015,
the full Board performs the function of these Committees
(2) Held indicates the number of meetings available for attendance by the director during the period of each director’s tenure
(3) Appointed as Non-Executive Director 11 February 2016
(4) Appointed as Non-Executive Director 29 November 2015 and Managing Director on 18 March 2016
(5) Non-Executive Director did not stand for re-election at the Annual General Meeting on 25 November 2015
(6) Non-Executive Director not re-elected at Annual General Meeting on 25 November 2015
(7) Resigned as Managing Director 18 March 2016
(8) Attended indicates attendance by invitation. Where a director is not a member of a Committee but attended meetings during the
period only the number of meetings attended, rather than held, is disclosed.
Following the changes to the Board at the Annual General Meeting on 25 November 2015, the Board resolved that the full Board
would perform the role of the Committees. The Company is considering the appointment of additional independent non-executive
directors in order to achieve best practice corporate governance and may reconstitute the Committees at the time.
For personal use only
P.22
DIRECTORS’
REPORT
EXECUTIVE MANAGEMENT
Mr Jonathan Salomon
Mr Peter Bekkers
(Managing Director - appointed 18 March 2016)
(Chief Geoscientist)
(Non-Executive Director - appointed 29 November 2015 to
17 March 2016)
B App Sc (Geology), GAICD
Mr Salomon was appointed as a Non-Executive Director in
November 2015 and Managing Director on 18 March 2016.
Mr Salomon has a Bachelor degree in Applied Science and
is a member of the American Association of Petroleum
Geologists, Petroleum Exploration Society of Australia, South
East Asian Petroleum Exploration Society and has over 30 years
of experience working for upstream energy companies. Mr
Salomon has worked for a number of oil and gas companies in
various senior positions including General Manager Exploration
and New Ventures at Murphy Oil Corporation and Global Head
of Geoscience at RISC PL, in addition to a number of executive
director roles including Strategic Energy Resources, Norwest
Energy and Nido Petroleum. At several times in his career, Mr
Salomon has acted as an independent consultant for various
oil and gas companies, including New Standard Energy and
Pacrim Energy. Mr Salomon first worked on Indian projects
in 1994 while at Ampolex and since that time has maintained
connection with the Indian industry, at various times bidding in
India’s exploration and field development rounds and working
with Indian companies as joint venture partners, both in India
and internationally.
Mr Mark Bolton
(Chief Financial Officer and Company Secretary - appointed
10 June 2016)
B Business
Mr Bolton was appointed Chief Financial Officer and Company
Secretary in June 2016. He has significant experience in the
resource sector in Australia, having worked as Chief Financial
Officer and Company Secretary for a number of resource
companies since 2003. Prior to this, Mr Bolton worked with
Ernst & Young as an Executive Director in Corporate Finance. Mr
Bolton has experience in the areas of commercial management
and the financing of resource projects internationally. He also
has extensive experience in capital and equity markets in a
number of jurisdictions including ASX and AIM.
Mr Jayant Sethi
(Head - India Assets)
Geology (Masters)
Mr Sethi joined Oilex in February 2015 as Head - India Assets
and is based in Gandhinagar India. Mr Sethi has over 31 years of
experience in the Indian oil and gas upstream industry. Mr Sethi
previously held senior management positions with Cairn Energy
Ltd and the Oil & Natural Gas Corporation, India’s national
oil company in areas of exploration, development, portfolio
evaluation, joint venture management, procurement supply chain
and enhanced oil recovery.
BSC (Hons) Geology and Geophysics
Mr Bekkers joined Oilex in 2007 as the Senior Explorationist. He
has over 20 years of experience in Australian and international
oil and gas exploration activities including the Far East, Middle
East, West Africa and South East Asia. Prior to joining Oilex, Mr
Bekkers held various roles with Woodside Energy Ltd, Santos
Ltd and Boral Energy Ltd in exploration and new ventures
evaluation. Mr Bekkers was appointed Chief Geoscientist for
Oilex in April 2010.
PRINCIPAL ACTIVITIES
The principal activities of the consolidated entity during the
course of the financial year included:
»
»
»
exploration for oil and gas;
appraisal and development of oil and gas prospects; and
production and sale of oil and gas.
There were no significant changes in the nature of these
activities during the year.
OPERATING RESULTS
The loss after income tax of the consolidated entity for the
year ended 30 June 2016 amounted to $36,154,111 (2015: loss
of $17,388,524). The increase in the loss was principally due
to $10,023,940 for the non-cash impairment of development
assets (2015: Nil) and $11,572,740 for the non-cash impairment
of exploration and evaluation assets in the current year (2015:
$11,870,051). Exploration expenses of $3,972,848 (2015:
1,304,057) have increased by $2,668,791 due to expenditure
on the Cambay Project. Administration expenses of $5,648,298
(2015: $3,078,163) have increased primarily due to the reduced
recovery of costs from Joint Ventures and costs associated with
the Zeta Resources Limited litigation.
FINANCIAL POSITION
The net assets of the consolidated entity totalled $9,328,974 as
at 30 June 2016 (2015: $26,603,951).
DIVIDENDS
No dividend was paid or declared during the year and the
directors do not recommend the payment of a dividend.
REVIEW OF OPERATIONS
A review of the operations of the Group during the financial year
and the results of those operations are set out in the Review of
Operations on pages 5 to 17 of this report.
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.23
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
DIRECTORS’
REPORT
SIGNIFICANT CHANGES IN THE STATE OF AFFAIRS
FINANCIAL POSITION
The Review of Operations details those changes that have had a
significant effect on the Group.
Other than those matters, there have been no other significant
changes in the state of affairs of the Group that occurred during
the financial year.
SIGNIFICANT EVENTS AFTER BALANCE DATE
As announced to the market on 29 September 2016, subsequent
to year end, the Board resolved to implement an organisation
restructure in order to reduce costs. The planned changes
include:
»
»
»
»
an overall reduction in the number of personnel;
a reduction in salaries and wages for existing personnel;
review of commercial operations at Cambay and
Bhandut Fields;
careful management of planned drilling and project costs;
and
»
deferral of all non-essential expenditure.
There were no other significant subsequent events occurring
after year end.
Capital Structure and Treasury Policy
Details of transactions involving ordinary shares during the
financial year are as follows:
July 2015
- first tranche placement
August 2015
- rights issue
18 August 2015
- second tranche placement
Conversion of $0.15 listed
options during the year
Number of
Shares
Gross Amount
Raised $
45,393,463
1,861,132
169,476,565
6,948,539
287,303,319
11,779,436
347,613
52,142
Total
502,520,960
20,641,249
At the date of this report, the Company had a total issued capital
of 1,180,426,999 ordinary shares and 17,250,000 unlisted options
exercisable at prices between $0.15 and $0.35 per share.
As at 30 June the Group had no loan borrowings.
LIKELY DEVELOPMENTS
Emphasis of Matter
Additional comments on expected results on operations of the
Group are included in the Review of Operations on pages 5 to 17.
Further disclosure as to likely developments in the operations
of the Group and expected results of those operations have
not been included in this report as, in the opinion of the Board,
these would be speculative and as such, disclosure would not
be in the best interests of the Group.
The audit opinion for the year ended 30 June 2016 contains
an emphasis of matter in relation to the potential uncertainty
regarding continuation as a going concern. The consolidated
financial statements have been prepared on a going concern
basis, which contemplates the realisation of assets and
settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business. The
Group will require funding in order to continue its exploration
activities and progress the Cambay Field drilling programme.
The funding requirements of the Group are reviewed on
a regular basis by the Group’s Chief Financial Officer and
Managing Director and are reported to the Board at each
board meeting to ensure the Group is able to meet its financial
obligations as and when they fall due. Until sufficient operating
cash flows are generated from its operations, the Group remains
reliant on equity raisings, joint venture contributions or debt
funding, as well as asset divestitures or farmouts to fund its
expenditure commitments.
The Company continues to actively develop funding options
in order that it can meet its expenditure commitments and
its planned future discretionary expenditure, as well as any
contingent liabilities that may arise.
For personal use onlyP.24
DIRECTORS’
REPORT
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES
The Group’s oil and gas exploration and production activities are subject to environmental regulation under the legislation of the
respective states and countries in which they operate. The majority of the Group’s activities involve low level disturbance associated
with its drilling programmes and production from existing wells. The Board actively monitors compliance with these regulations and
as at the date of this report is not aware of any material breaches in respect of these regulations.
DIRECTORS’ INTERESTS
The relevant interest of each director in shares and unlisted options issued by the Company, as notified by the directors to the ASX in
accordance with Section 205G (1) of the Corporations Act 2001, at the date of this report is as follows:
Number of Ordinary Shares
Number of Options Over Ordinary Shares
Direct
-
-
-
Indirect
1,848,218
-
-
Direct
Indirect
-
-
-
-
-
-
M D J Cozijn
B Lingo
J Salomon
SHARE OPTIONS
Unissued shares under options
At the date of this report unissued ordinary shares of the Company under option (with an exercise price) are:
Expiry Date
Exercise Price
Number of Shares
Expiry Date
Exercise Price
Number of Shares
Unlisted Options
4 November 2016
11 November 2016
5 December 2016
27 June 2017
5 August 2017
$0.15
$0.15
$0.15
$0.25
$0.25
2,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
500,000
875,000
Unlisted Options
11 November 2017
22 December 2017
16 February 2018
5 August 2018
16 February 2019
Total
$0.25
$0.10
$0.25
$0.35
$0.35
2,000,000
5,000,000
500,000
875,000
500,000
17,250,000
These options do not entitle the holder to participate in any share issue of the Company or any other body corporate.
Unissued shares under option that expired during the year
During the financial year, the following unlisted employee options expired or were cancelled upon cessation of employment:
Date Lapsed
28 July 2015
5 August 2015
18 August 2015
18 August 2015
19 November 2015
17 December 2015
8 March 2016
6 May 2016
6 May 2016
27 June 2016
Total
Number
150,000
75,000
250,000
350,000
4,000,000
3,000,000
5,000,000
200,000
200,000
500,000
13,725,000
Exercise Price
$0.25
$0.63
$0.15
$0.25
$0.15
$0.15
$0.25
$0.25
$0.35
$0.15
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use only
P.25
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
DIRECTORS’
REPORT
Shares issued on exercise of unlisted options
During or since the end of the financial year, the Company
has not issued ordinary shares as a result of the exercise of
unlisted options.
Shares issued on exercise of listed options
During and since the end of the financial year, the Company
issued ordinary shares as a result of the exercise of listed options
as follows (there were no amounts unpaid on the shares issued):
Number of
Shares
Amount Paid on
Each Share
During the financial year
347,613
$0.15
Since the end of the
financial year
-
-
On 7 September 2015, all the remaining 188,248,858 listed
$0.15 options issued by the Company expired unexercised.
INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE OF DIRECTORS
AND OFFICERS
The Group paid a premium in respect of insurance cover for the
directors and officers of the Group. The Group has not included
details of the nature of the liabilities covered or the amount of
the premium paid in respect of the directors’ liability and legal
expense insurance contracts, as such disclosure is prohibited
under the terms of the insurance contract.
PROCEEDINGS ON BEHALF OF THE COMPANY
No proceedings have been brought on behalf of the Company,
nor has any application been made in respect of the Company
under Section 237 of the Corporations Act 2001.
NON-AUDIT SERVICES
The Company may decide to employ the Auditor on assignments
additional to their statutory audit duties where the Auditor’s
expertise and experience with the Group is important.
The Board has considered the non-audit services provided
during the year and is satisfied that the provision of the non-
audit services is compatible with, and did not compromise,
the general standard of independence for auditors imposed by
the Corporations Act 2001. The directors are satisfied that the
provision of non-audit services by the auditor, as set out below,
did not compromise the auditor independence requirements of
the Corporations Act 2001 for the following reasons:
»
»
all non-audit services were subject to the corporate
governance procedures adopted by the Group and these
have been reviewed by the Board to ensure they do not
impact the impartiality and objectivity of the auditor; and
the non-audit services provided do not undermine the
general principles relating to auditor independence as
set out in APES 110 Code of Ethics for Professional
Accountants, as they did not involve reviewing or auditing
the auditor’s own work, acting in a management or decision
making capacity for the Group, acting as an advocate for the
Group or jointly sharing risks and rewards.
Refer note 23 for details of the amounts paid to the auditor of
the Group, KPMG Australia, and its network firms for audit and
non-audit services provided during the year.
ROUNDING OF AMOUNTS
The Company is a company of the kind referred to in ASIC
Corporations (Rounding in Financial/Directors’ Reports)
Instrument 2016/191 and therefore the amounts contained in
this report and in the financial report have been rounded to the
nearest dollar, unless otherwise stated.
LEAD AUDITOR’S INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION
The Lead Auditor’s Independence Declaration for the year ended
30 June 2016 has been received and can be found on page 40.
REMUNERATION REPORT - AUDITED
A Nomination and Remuneration Committee was established
by the Board on 12 August 2015, incorporating the role of the
previously established Remuneration Committee, to assist the
Board in fulfilling its corporate governance responsibilities with
respect to remuneration. The Nomination and Remuneration
Committee is responsible for the review and recommendation
to the Board, of the Company’s Remuneration Policy, senior
executives’ remuneration, the remuneration framework for
directors, superannuation arrangements, incentive plans and
remuneration reporting.
The Nomination and Remuneration Committee obtains advice
on the appropriateness of compensation packages of both the
Company and the Group given trends in comparative companies
both locally and internationally and the objectives of the Group’s
compensation strategy to ensure that the Company can set
competitive remuneration to attract, retain and motivate
executive directors and senior executives.
Following changes to the Board at the Annual General Meeting
on 25 November 2015, the appointment of a new managing
director in March 2016, and the subsequent decrease in the
number of non-executive directors in March 2016 to two
directors, the Board resolved in June 2016 that it would perform
the function of the Nomination and Remuneration Committee.
For personal use onlyP.26
DIRECTORS’
REPORT
1. PRINCIPLES OF COMPENSATION
Short-term incentive bonus
Remuneration is referred to as compensation throughout this
report. The Remuneration Report explains the remuneration
arrangements for directors and senior executives of Oilex Ltd
who have authority and responsibility for planning, directing and
controlling the activities of the Group (key management personnel).
The compensation structures explained below are designed
to attract, retain and motivate suitably qualified candidates,
reward the achievement of strategic objectives and achieve
the broader outcome of creation of value for shareholders. The
compensation structures take into account:
»
»
»
»
»
»
the capability and experience of the key management
personnel;
the ability of key management personnel to control the
performance of the relevant segments;
the current downturn of the resources industry;
the Company’s performance including:
-
-
the Group’s earnings; and
the growth in share price and delivering constant returns
on shareholder wealth;
exploration success; and
development of projects.
Compensation packages include a mix of fixed compensation
and long-term performance-based incentives. In specific
circumstances the Group may also provide short-term
cash incentives based upon the achievement of Company
performance hurdles.
1.1 Fixed Compensation
Fixed compensation consists of base compensation and employer
contributions to superannuation funds. Compensation levels are
reviewed annually through a process that considers individual,
sector and overall performance of the Group. In addition, reviews
of available data on oil and gas industry companies provide
comparison figures to ensure the directors’ and senior executives’
compensation is competitive in the market.
In January 2016 following a review of cost reduction initiatives,
the Board resolved to reduce the remuneration of Non-Executive
Directors, the Managing Director and employees by 10%
effective from 1 February 2016.
Compensation for senior executives is separately reviewed at
the time of promotion or initial appointment.
1.2 Performance Linked Compensation
Performance linked compensation includes both short-term
and long-term incentives designed to reward key management
personnel for growth in shareholder wealth. The short-term
incentive (STI) is an “at risk” bonus provided in the form of cash
or shares, while the long-term incentive plan (LTI) is used to
reward performance by granting options over ordinary shares of
the Company.
The Group does not utilise short-term incentives on an annual or
regular basis, as these are not considered part of the standard
compensation package for key management personnel.
In certain circumstances the Board may, for reasons of retention
or motivation, consider the use of short-term incentives.
Short-term incentives, if granted, are at the discretion of the
Board having regard to the business plans set before the
commencement of the financial year as well as the achievement
of performance targets as determined by the Board. These
targets include a combination of key strategic, financial and
personal performance measures which may have a major
influence over company performance in the short-term.
The Board appointed Mr Jonathan Salomon as Managing
Director on 18 March 2016 for an initial term of one year. The
Board included the following STI’s in the remuneration package
of Mr Salomon, conditional upon shareholder approval.
1. $100,000 in Oilex shares, if by 18 March 2017 the Company
implements an agreed programme for the recovery of the
joint venture receivables owed to the Company by its joint
venture partners as at 31 December 2015 in full, and a
drilling campaign undertaken at Cambay field is completed in
accordance with an approved work programme and budget.
2. $100,000 in Oilex shares upon resolution of the Zeta
Resources Limited litigation.
If shareholder approval is not granted in respect of the above
two key performance indicators (KPI’s) then these special
funding awards will be payable in cash. The pricing of the Oilex
shares is to be based on the 20 day VWAP for OEX on the ASX
in the 20 trading days preceding the meeting of shareholders to
approve such awards.
Oilex announced the settlement of the litigation with Zeta
Resources Limited on 8 June 2016. The fully vested short-
term incentive awarded to Mr Salomon in the current year of
$100,000 was accrued as compensation, if shareholder approval
is not granted, this special funding award will be payable in cash
in the following year.
During the year no cash performance bonuses were granted to
any employee.
Long-term incentive bonus
Long-term incentives include retention rights and options and
are issued at the discretion of the Board.
The issue of options is designed to allow the Group to attract
and retain talented employees. The issue of options aims to
closely align the interests of senior executives and employees
with those of shareholders and create a link between increasing
shareholder value and employee reward. Any options issued
to senior executives are issued under the Australian Securities
Exchange Rule 7.1.
The Company did not issue any options to senior executives or
staff during the year.
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.27
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
DIRECTORS’
REPORT
1. PRINCIPLES OF COMPENSATION (continued)
1.2 Performance Linked Compensation (continued)
Whilst the Company moved certain assets to development
in the last financial year, these have been impaired and
the Company does not generate profits or net operating
cash inflows and as such does not pay any dividends, and
consequently remuneration packages are not linked to profit
performance. It is the performance of the overall exploration and
appraisal programme and ultimately the share price that largely
determines Oilex’s performance. The Remuneration Committee
therefore considered that fixed compensation combined with
short-term and long-term incentive components is the best
remuneration structure for achieving the Company’s objectives
to the benefit of shareholders. The table below sets out the
closing share price at the end of the current and four previous
financial years.
Share Price
(cents)
2016
2015
2014
2013
2012
1.0
6.1
11.5
5.0
11.0
The remuneration of directors, may consist of a cash component
as well as an equity component, and is designed to retain
directors of a high calibre, whilst rewarding them for their
ongoing commitment and contribution to the Company on a
cost effective basis. The issue of shares or options to directors,
subject to shareholder approval, is judged by the Company, to
further align the directors’ interests with that of shareholders,
whilst maintaining the cash position of the Company. The Board
does not consider that there are any significant opportunity
costs to the Company or benefits foregone by the Company in
issuing shares or options to directors.
The Board granted the incoming Managing Director,
Mr Salomon a possible retention award of 2 million retention
rights to fully paid ordinary shares in the Company, if Mr
Salomon’s employment with the Company is extended beyond
the initial one-year term, expiring on 18 March 2017, with the
issue of these being subject to shareholder approval.
No non-executive directors have been granted any share rights
or unlisted options in this financial year. During the year no long-
term incentives were granted to any employee.
1.3 Non-Executive Directors
Total compensation for all Non-Executive Directors is based on
comparison with external data with reference to fees paid to Non-
Executive Directors of comparable companies. Directors’ fees
cover all main Board activities and membership of committees.
The Board resolved to reduce the remuneration of Non-
Executive Directors by 10% effective from 1 February 2016.
The Chairman’s base annual fee including superannuation was set
at $87,200 on 1 July 2009 and remained unchanged, other than to
include the legislated increases to the superannuation guarantee
levy, until 1 February 2016, when it was reduced to $78,840.
The Vice Chairman’s base annual fee including superannuation
was set at $65,400 on 29 July 2011 and remained unchanged up
to 25 November 2015, when this position was vacated.
The company’s United Kingdom based Non-Executive Director
Mr Auld annual fee was set at £45,000 in January 2015. Mr Auld
was not re-elected. The Company has not appointed any new
overseas based directors.
The Company set the base fee for Australian based Non-
Executive Directors at $50,000 per annum, plus statutory
superannuation, together with an additional fee of $25,000 to
compensate for any expected additional time commitments. The
fees paid to Non-Executive Directors appointed after 1 February
2016 are subject to the 10% reduction.
The aggregate maximum fixed annual amount of remuneration
available for Non-Executive Directors of $500,000 per annum
was approved by Shareholders on 9 November 2011.
In addition to the fixed component, the Company can
remunerate any director called upon to perform extra services
or undertake any work for the Company beyond their general
duties. This remuneration may either be in addition to, or in
substitution for, the director’s share of remuneration approved
by Shareholders.
Gross fees paid to India Hydrocarbons Limited (IHL), a related
party of Mr Bhandari, are for consultancy services provided in
addition to directorial services and therefore are not part of the
fixed component. Payments made for consultancy services to
IHL are for services undertaken under a consultancy contract
with the Company negotiated effective from 1 May 2006, six
years prior to Mr Bhandari becoming a Non-Executive Director
on 9 November 2011. The gross annual amounts paid of $34,327
(2015: $161,059) relating to consultancy services are disclosed
in the key management personnel disclosures in the Related
Parties note 27 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Group’s share of these fees of $34,327 (2015: $77,845)
are disclosed in other related party transactions in the Related
Parties note 27 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. The
balance of 0% (2015: 52%) is payable by the Joint Operations.
For personal use onlyP.28
DIRECTORS’
REPORT
1.4 Clawback Policy
The Board has adopted the following Clawback Policy applicable from August 2015.
In relation to circumstances where an employee acts fraudulently or dishonestly, or wilfully breaches his or her duties to the
Company or any of its subsidiaries, the Board has adopted a clawback policy in relation to any cash performance bonuses (including
deferred share awards) or LTIs. The Board reserves the right to take action to reduce, recoup or otherwise adjust an employee’s
performance based remuneration in circumstances where in the opinion of the Board, an employee has acted fraudulently or
dishonestly or wilfully breached his or her duties to the Company or any of its subsidiaries. The Board may:
»
»
»
»
»
»
»
deem any bonus payable, but not yet paid, to be forfeited;
require the repayment by the employee of all or part of any cash bonus received;
determine that any unvested and/or unexercised LTIs will lapse;
require the repayment of all or part of the cash amount received by the employee following vesting and subsequent sale of a LTI;
reduce future discretionary remuneration to the extent considered necessary or appropriate to take account of the event that has
triggered the clawback;
initiate legal action against the employee; and/or
take any other action the Board considers appropriate.
1.5 Managing Director Sign On and Retention Awards
The table below sets out the special funding and retention awards granted to Mr Salomon as part of his employment contract. The
retention award was issued free of charge and enables the holder to subscribe for one fully paid ordinary share in the Company per
retention right.
Terms and Conditions of Each Grant
2016
J Salomon
Total
Number of Shares
Granted
Number of
Shares Vesting
in the Year (1)
Percentage
of Cumulative
Shares Vested (%)
Service
Commencement
Date / Grant Date
Value at Grant
Date (2)
Exercise Price
-
-
-
-
-
18 March 2016
$100,000
Nil
(1) For accounting purposes under AASB 2 Share-based Payment the granting of $100,000 in Oilex shares upon the resolution of the
Zeta Resources Limited litigation, subject to shareholder approval has been treated as vested for the year ended 30 June 2016.
The granting of $100,000 in Oilex shares upon recovery of the joint venture partner’s outstanding receivable and progressing of
the drilling of the next well at Cambay by 18 March 2017, subject to shareholder approval, and the 2,000,000 retention rights that
may be granted, should Oilex elect to extend and Mr Salomon elects to enter a subsequent term of employment, also subject to
shareholder approval, have been treated as not vested.
(2) The Zeta litigation settlement was announced by the Company on 8 June 2016, with $100,000 expensed to 30 June 2016.
For accounting purposes under AASB 2 Share-based Payment where the grant date occurs after year end (upon shareholder
approval), the fair value of the grant is estimated at the end of the reporting period 30 June 2016. If shareholder approval is not
granted, then this award will be payable in cash.
1.6 Remuneration Consultants
There were no remuneration recommendations made in relation to key management personnel by remuneration consultants in the
financial year ended 30 June 2016.
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use only
P.29
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
DIRECTORS’
REPORT
1. PRINCIPLES OF COMPENSATION (continued)
1.7 Adoption of year ended 30 June 2015 Remuneration Report - First Strike recorded based on a poll
At the Annual General Meeting held 25 November 2015 Resolution 1, the adoption of the Remuneration Report, was put to a poll
with greater than 25% of votes cast against this resolution. This resulted in a first strike being recorded.
The Board has adopted a number of actions in response to the first strike.
In January 2016, the Board resolved to reduce the remuneration of the Non-Executive Directors, the Managing Director and Australian
based employees employed at date of this resolution by 10% effective from 1 February 2016.
The number of directors has been reduced from four to three.
The remuneration package for the Chief Financial Officer position was further reduced following the resignation of Mr Bath in May
2016. The remuneration package upon appointment, for the Chief Financial Officer Mr Bolton was $250,000 plus superannuation.
No STI cash bonuses or LTI unlisted options have been granted to key management personnel or staff in the current year.
Detailed explanatory notes in relation to the Remuneration Table have been included.
1.8 Subsequent Changes to Key Management Personnel Remuneration
On 29 September 2016, the Company announced that it would implement a second expanded organisation restructure in order to
further reduce costs.
The Non-Executive Directors base fees, reduced by 10% in February 2016, will now be reduced by a further 10% effective
1 October 2016. The additional annual fee of $25,000 to compensate Mr Lingo for any expected additional time commitments
ceased 1 July 2016.
The Managing Director, Mr Salomon has agreed to reduce his base salary by 22.3% effective 1 October 2016.
The Head of India Assets, Mr Sethi has agreed to reduce his base salary by 18% effective 1 October 2016.
The Chief Financial Officer, Mr Bolton has agreed to reduce his base salary by 5% effective 1 October 2016.
The Chief Geoscientist, Mr Bekkers ceased employment effective 30 September 2016.
For personal use onlyP.30
DIRECTORS’
REPORT
2. EMPLOYMENT CONTRACTS
The following table summarises the terms and conditions of contracts between key executives and the Company:
Contract
Start Date
Contract
Termination Date
Resignation
Notice
Required
Unvested
Options on
Resignation
Termination
Notice
Required
from the
Company (1)
18 March 2016
18 March 2017 (2)
3 months
Forfeited
3 months
Executive
Position
J Salomon
Managing
Director
M Bolton
P Bekkers
Chief
Financial
Officer and
Company
Secretary
Chief
Geoscientist
3 June 2016
31 May 2017 (3)
3 months
Forfeited
3 months
6 March 2007
n/a
1 month
Forfeited
1 month
J Sethi
Head - India
Assets
16 February 2015
n/a
1 month
Forfeited
30 days
Termination
Payment
For termination by the
Company, three months’
salary plus any accrued leave
entitlement. If a Material
Change Event occurs,
employee may give notice
to the Company within
one month of the Material
Change Event, terminating
the Contract of Employment
and following that effective
date, the Company will pay a
Termination Payment equal
to six months’ fixed annual
remuneration. The current
fixed annual remuneration
is $350,000. Subject to the
Corporations Act 2001 and
any necessary approvals
required thereunder.
For termination by
the Company, three
months’ salary.
For termination by the
Company, one months’
salary plus any accrued leave
entitlement. If a Material
Change Event occurs,
employee may give notice
to the Company within 60
days of the Material Change
Event, terminating the
Contract of Employment
and following that effective
date, the Company will pay a
Termination Payment equal to
$125,000.
For termination by the
Company, one months’
salary plus any accrued
leave entitlement.
(1) The Company may terminate the contract immediately if serious misconduct has occurred. In this case the termination payment
is only the fixed remuneration earned until the date of termination and any unvested options will immediately be forfeited.
(2) The Managing Director’s contract has an initial term of one year, expiring 18 March 2017 which can be extended by mutual
agreement between the Company and Mr Salomon.
(3) The Chief Financial Officer’s contract has an initial term of one year, expiring 31 May 2017 which can be extended by mutual
agreement between the Company and Mr Bolton.
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.31
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
DIRECTORS’
REPORT
3. DIRECTORS’ AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS’ REMUNERATION
Details of the nature and amount of each major element of remuneration of each director of the Company and other key management
personnel of the consolidated entity are:
Short-Term
Salary &
Fees
Year
$
STI Cash
Bonus (1)
$
Benefits
(including Non-
Monetary) (2)
$
Non-Executive Directors
M D J Cozijn (5)
Chairman
B Lingo (6)
Non-Executive Director
S Bhandari (7)
Vice Chairman
J D Auld (8)
Non-Executive Director
Executive Directors
J Salomon (9)
Managing Director
R L Miller (10)
Managing Director
Executives
M Bolton (11)
Chief Financial Officer / Company Secretary
P Bekkers (12)
Chief Geoscientist
J Sethi (13)
Head - India Assets
C Bath (14)
Chief Financial Officer / Company Secretary
Total
Total
2016
2015
2016
2015
2016
2015
2016
2015
2016
2015
2016
2015
2016
2015
2016
2015
2016
2015
2016
2015
2016
2015
76,667
104,000
26,185
-
61,577
226,459
39,853
39,285
113,741
-
295,659
451,521
19,180
-
288,460
294,443
272,784
84,545
289,628
280,067
1,483,734
1,480,320
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total
$
76,667
104,000
26,185
-
61,577
226,459
39,853
39,285
116,844
-
299,574
457,901
19,600
-
294,015
296,795
272,784
94,012
294,563
281,800
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3,103
-
3,915
6,380
420
-
5,555
2,352
-
9,467
4,935
1,733
17,928
19,932
1,501,662
1,500,252
The Directors of the Company may be Directors of the Company’s subsidiaries. No remuneration is received for directorships of
subsidiaries. All key management personnel other than Mr Sethi are employed by the parent entity.
Refer to the following explanatory notes for additional information.
Share-based
Payments
Other Long-Term
Benefits (3)
Termination Benefits
Options (4)
$
$
$
Total
$
Proportion of
Remuneration
Performance
Related
%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
29,382
21,614
9,808
13,862
48,500
35,476
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
69,000
22,095
91,095
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
5,376
101,001
5,691
10,915
26,537
293,044
137,604
404,960
-
-
-
83,950
113,880
28,673
61,577
226,459
39,853
39,285
368,574
467,005
21,422
356,177
449,757
318,551
114,235
366,112
588,706
1,881,848
1,999,327
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2%
22%
2%
10%
7%
50%
Post-Employment
Superannuation
Benefits
$
7,283
9,880
2,488
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
9,104
1,822
27,404
30,347
30,268
9,308
22,917
102,987
58,639
10,805
9,310
100,000
236,959
42%
For personal use only
Non-Executive Directors
M D J Cozijn (5)
Chairman
B Lingo (6)
S Bhandari (7)
Vice Chairman
J D Auld (8)
Non-Executive Director
Non-Executive Director
Executive Directors
J Salomon (9)
Managing Director
R L Miller (10)
Managing Director
Executives
M Bolton (11)
P Bekkers (12)
Chief Geoscientist
J Sethi (13)
C Bath (14)
Head - India Assets
Total
Total
Chief Financial Officer / Company Secretary
Chief Financial Officer / Company Secretary
Year
2016
2015
2016
2015
2016
2015
2016
2015
2016
2015
2016
2015
2016
2015
2016
2015
2016
2015
2016
2015
2016
2015
-
-
-
76,667
104,000
26,185
61,577
226,459
39,853
39,285
113,741
295,659
451,521
19,180
288,460
294,443
272,784
84,545
289,628
280,067
Total
$
76,667
104,000
26,185
61,577
226,459
39,853
39,285
-
-
-
3,915
6,380
299,574
457,901
420
19,600
5,555
2,352
9,467
4,935
1,733
294,015
296,795
272,784
94,012
294,563
281,800
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,483,734
1,480,320
17,928
19,932
1,501,662
1,500,252
Short-Term
Salary &
Fees
$
STI Cash
Bonus (1)
$
Benefits
(including Non-
Monetary) (2)
$
Share-based
Payments
Post-Employment
Superannuation
Benefits
Other Long-Term
Benefits (3)
Termination Benefits
Options (4)
$
$
$
$
7,283
9,880
2,488
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3,103
116,844
10,805
9,310
-
-
9,104
1,822
-
27,404
30,347
30,268
9,308
22,917
-
102,987
58,639
-
-
-
-
-
29,382
21,614
9,808
-
-
13,862
48,500
35,476
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
69,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
22,095
-
91,095
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
100,000
-
-
-
-
-
5,376
101,001
5,691
10,915
26,537
293,044
137,604
404,960
P.32
DIRECTORS’
REPORT
Proportion of
Remuneration
Performance
Related
%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
42%
-
-
-
-
-
2%
22%
2%
10%
7%
50%
Total
$
83,950
113,880
28,673
-
61,577
226,459
39,853
39,285
236,959
-
368,574
467,005
21,422
-
356,177
449,757
318,551
114,235
366,112
588,706
1,881,848
1,999,327
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use only
P.33
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
DIRECTORS’
REPORT
3. DIRECTORS’ AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS’ REMUNERATION (continued)
Notes in Relation to the Table of Directors’ and Executive Officers’ Remuneration
(1) The amount represents the STI earned in the respective year ended 30 June. There were no cash bonuses granted in 2016.
(2) Benefits, including non-monetary include relocation costs and related expenses, as well as minor benefits, such as payments on
behalf of employees considered personal, car parking and any associated fringe benefits tax.
(3) Includes, where applicable, accrued employee leave entitlements.
(4) All share-base payment disclosures, other than for Mr Salomon, relate to unlisted options.
The fair value of the options is calculated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Model. The fair value of the options is allocated
to each reporting period evenly over the period from grant date to vesting date. The value disclosed is the portion of the fair value of
the options allocated in each reporting period. In valuing the options, market conditions have been taken into account.
No options were issued to key management personnel and executives as remuneration during the year ended 30 June 2016.
The value of Mr Salomon’s share based payments expense is $100,000 in Oilex shares, subject to shareholder approval
(refer note 9).
(5) Mr Cozijn’s remuneration reflects the resolution by the Board resolved to reduce the remuneration of Non-Executive Directors, the
Managing Director and employees by 10% effective from 1 February 2016. Mr Cozijn received additional remuneration during the
previous financial year of $24,000 plus 9.5% superannuation in relation to extra duties undertaken for Oilex (West Kampar) Limited.
(6) Mr Lingo was appointed a Non-Executive Director on 11 February 2016.
(7) Mr Bhandari was appointed a Non-Executive Director on 9 November 2011 and was a Director to 25 November 2015. Prior to this
appointment, India Hydrocarbons Limited (IHL) provided consultancy services to the Group, which continue to be provided until Mr
Bhandari stood down at the Annual General Meeting. Mr Bhandari’s salary and fees consist of director fees of $27,250 (2015: $65,400)
and the IHL consultancy service fees, the majority of work which is undertaken by Mr Bhandari, of $34,327 (2015: $161,059). The net
cost to the Group (after Joint Operations recoveries) in relation to the consultancy service was $34,327 (2015: $77,845).
(8) Mr Auld was a Non-Executive Director from 27 January 2015 until the Annual General Meeting held 25 November 2015 at which
he was not re-elected. Mr Auld is based in the United Kingdom and was paid £45,000 per annum. The amount disclosed is the
pro rata amount converted into Australian dollars at the applicable exchange rate at the date of payment.
(9) On 18 March 2016 Mr Salomon was appointed Managing Director, with a fixed annual remuneration of $350,000 per annum,
inclusive of statutory superannuation, prior to this Mr Salomon was a Non-Executive Director appointed 29 November 2015. The
amount paid for Managing Director fees since 18 March 2016 was $104,028, including non-monetary benefits of $3,103. The
amount paid for Non-Executive Director fees from 29 November 2015 to 17 March 2016 was $23,621 and reflects the resolution
by the Board resolved to reduce the remuneration of Non-Executive Directors, the Managing Director and employees by 10%
effective from 1 February 2016.
Upon appointment as Managing Director, Mr Salomon was granted the following three initial funding and retention awards,
conditional upon shareholder approval:
»
»
$100,000 in Oilex shares upon resolution of the Zeta Resources Limited litigation. This performance condition was achieved
as at 8 June 2016.
$100,000 in Oilex shares in respect of recovery of joint venture partner’s outstanding receivables and progressing of the drilling
of the next well at Cambay within the Term. This performance condition has not been achieved as at the date of this report.
If shareholder approval is not granted in respect of the above two KPI’s then these Awards will be payable in cash. The pricing
of the Oilex shares will be based on the 20 day VWAP for OEX on ASX in the 20 days preceding the meeting of shareholders
to approve such awards.
» Granting of 2,000,000 Retention Rights to shares at no cost if Mr Salomon and the Company agree that Mr Salomon will
enter into a subsequent term of employment as Managing Director. The award of these rights to shares are subject to
shareholder approval.
Shareholder approval is expected to be sought at the AGM in November 2016.
For personal use only
P.34
DIRECTORS’
REPORT
(10) Mr Miller resigned as Managing Director on 18 March 2016. Included in the $295,659 (2015: $451,521) invoiced to the Group for
his services as Managing Director, was $99,000 (2015: $190,000) in the current year to compensate for additional time spent
overseas. Although the Board resolved to reduce the remuneration of Non-Executive Directors, the Managing Director and
employees by 10% effective from 1 February 2016, Mr Miller reduced his Managing Director fee by 10% effective 1 January
2016. The Board approved the payment of $69,000 representing the total of Mr Miller’s accrued entitlements and termination
payments on 18 March 2016.
(11) On 10 June 2016 Mr Bolton became key management personal following his appointment on 3 June 2016.
(12) Mr Bekkers remuneration reflects the resolution by the Board resolved to reduce the remuneration of Non-Executive Directors,
the Managing Director and employees by 10% effective from 1 February 2016.
(13) Mr Sethi became key management personnel on 16 February 2015 and is based in India. Mr Sethi’s remuneration disclosed in 2016
is for the full year. Mr Sethi’s remuneration has been converted from Indian Rupees at the average exchange rate for the year.
(14) Mr Bath resigned 24 May 2016. Mr Bath’s remuneration reflects the resolution by the Board resolved to reduce the remuneration
of Non-Executive Directors, the Managing Director and employees by 10% effective from 1 February 2016. Mr Bath’s termination
payment consisted of his accrued leave entitlements.
Analysis of bonuses included in remuneration
There were no short-term incentive cash bonuses awarded as remuneration to key management personnel during the financial year.
4. EQUITY INSTRUMENTS
SHARES
There were no ordinary shares in the Company issued as compensation to key management personnel during the financial year.
OPTIONS
All options refer to unlisted options over shares of the Company, which are exercisable on a one-for-one basis.
4.1 Options Over Equity Instruments Granted as Compensation
Details on options over ordinary shares in the Company that were granted as compensation to each key management person during
the financial year and details on options that vested during the financial year are as follows:
Number of
Options Granted
Grant Date
Fair Value of Options
at Grant Date
Exercise Price of
Options Granted
Expiry Date of
Options Granted
Number of
Options Vested
P Bekkers
J Sethi
C Bath (1)
500,000
5 August 2014
500,000
16 February 2015
1,500,000
25 August 2014
$0.11
$0.02
$0.12
$0.35
$0.35
$0.35
05 August 2018
16 February 2019
500,000
500,000
25 August 2019
1,500,000
(1) Mr Bath resigned 24 May 2016 and held 3,000,000 vested and exercisable unlisted options at date of resignation. These options
expired 24 August 2016.
With the exception of options that have vested, which can be retained by the employee in accordance with the timeframes in the
option terms and conditions, all options expire on the earlier of their expiry date or termination of the individual’s employment.
Options that have vested can be retained by directors until expiry date, and do not expire on termination of employment. Further
details, including grant dates and exercise dates regarding options granted to key management personnel are in note 19 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
4.2 Options Over Equity Instruments Granted as Compensation Granted Since Year End
No options over ordinary shares in the Company were granted as compensation to key management personnel and executives since
the end of the financial year.
4.3 Modification of Terms of Equity-Settled Share-based Payment Transactions
No terms of equity-settled share-based payment transactions (including options granted as compensation to key management
personnel) have been altered or modified by the issuing entity during the financial year.
4.4 Exercise of Options Granted as Compensation
During the financial year no shares were issued on the exercise of options previously granted as compensation.
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.35
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
DIRECTORS’
REPORT
4. EQUITY INSTRUMENTS (continued)
4.5 Details of Equity Incentives Affecting Current and Future Remuneration
Details of vesting profiles of the options held by each key management person of the Group are detailed below:
Number of
Options
Exercise
Price
Grant
Date
% Vested
in Year
% Lapsed in
Year (1)
Financial Years in
Which Grant Vests
J Salomon (2)
M D J Cozijn
B Lingo (3)
S Bhandari (4)
J Auld (5)
R L Miller (6)
M Bolton (7)
P Bekkers
J Sethi
C Bath (8)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
500,000
500,000
1,500,000
$0.25
$0.25
$0.25
5 August 2014
16 February 2015
25 August 2014
100%
100%
100%
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
30 June 2016
30 June 2016
30 June 2016
(1) The number of options lapsed also includes relinquished options.
(2) Mr Salomon appointed 29 November 2015 as a Non-Executive Director and as Managing Director 18 March 2016.
(3) Mr Lingo appointed 11 February 2016.
(4) Mr Bhandari did not stand for re-election at the Annual General Meeting on 25 November 2015.
(5) Mr Auld was not re-elected at the Annual General Meeting on 25 November 2015.
(6) Mr Miller resigned 18 March 2016. Mr Miller held 6,000,000 vested and exercisable options at date of resignation.
(7) Mr Bolton appointed 3 June 2016.
(8) Mr Bath resigned 24 May 2016. Mr Bath held 3,000,000 vested and exercisable unlisted options at date of resignation. These
options expired 24 August 2016.
Options issued to directors vest on date of grant. All options that have vested can be retained by the director upon resignation or
termination of employment.
The options issued to employees can, upon resignation or termination of employee be retained by the employee within three
months from the date on which the employee ceases employment. All unvested options will lapse upon resignation or termination of
employment prior to the option’s vesting date.
For personal use onlyP.36
DIRECTORS’
REPORT
4.6 Analysis of Movements in Equity Instruments
The movement during the financial year of unlisted options over ordinary shares in the Company held by each key management
person is detailed below:
Value of Options
Granted in Year (1)
Value of Options
Exercised in Year
Number of Options
Lapsed in Year (2)
J Salomon (3)
M D J Cozijn
B Lingo (4)
S Bhandari (5)
J D Auld (6)
R L Miller (7)
M Bolton (8)
P Bekkers
J Sethi
C Bath (9)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,000,000
-
-
-
500,000
-
-
(1) The value of options granted in the year is the fair value of the options calculated at grant date using the Black-Scholes Model.
This amount is allocated to remuneration over the vesting period.
(2) The number of options lapsed also includes relinquished options.
(3) Mr Salomon appointed 29 November 2015 as a Non-Executive Director and as Managing Director 18 March 2016.
(4) Mr Lingo appointed 11 February 2016.
(5) Mr Bhandari did not stand for re-election at the Annual General Meeting on 25 November 2015.
(6) Mr Auld was not re-elected at the Annual General Meeting on 25 November 2015.
(7) Mr Miller resigned 18 March 2016.
(8) Mr Bolton appointed 3 June 2016.
(9) Mr Bath resigned 24 May 2016.
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.37
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
DIRECTORS’
REPORT
4. EQUITY INSTRUMENTS (continued)
4.7 Options over Equity Instruments Granted as Compensation
No unlisted options held by key management personnel are vested but not exercisable. The movement during the financial year in
the number of options over ordinary shares in the Company held, directly, indirectly or beneficially, by each key management person,
including their related parties, is as follows:
Held at
1 July 2015
Granted as
Compensation
Exercised
Other Changes (1)
Held at
30 June 2016
Vested During
the Year
J Salomon (2)
M D J Cozijn
B Lingo (3)
n/a
-
n/a
S Bhandari (4)
4,000,000
J D Auld (5)
-
R L Miller (6)
6,000,000
M Bolton (7)
P Bekkers
J Sethi
C Bath (8)
n/a
2,000,000
1,000,000
3,000,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(4,000,000)
-
-
-
-
-
-
n/a
n/a
n/a
-
(500,000)
1,500,000
1,000,000
-
-
Vested and
Exercisable at
30 June 2016
-
-
-
-
-
n/a
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
500,000
500,000
1,500,000
1,000,000
n/a
1,500,000
n/a
(1) Other changes represent options that expired or were forfeited during the year. The 4,000,000 options relinquished 19 November
2015 were granted during the financial year ended 30 June 2014. The 500,000 options that lapsed were granted during the
financial year ended 30 June 2013.
(2) Mr Salomon appointed 29 November 2015 as a Non-Executive Director and as Managing Director 18 March 2016.
(3) Mr Lingo appointed 11 February 2016.
(4) Mr Bhandari did not stand for re-election at the Annual General Meeting on 25 November 2015.
(5) Mr Auld was not re-elected at the Annual General Meeting on 25 November 2015.
(6) Mr Miller resigned 18 March 2016. Mr Miller held 6,000,000 vested and exercisable unlisted options at date of resignation.
4,000,000 options will expire November 2016 and 2,000,000 will expire November 2017.
(7) Mr Bolton appointed 3 June 2016.
(8) Mr Bath resigned 24 May 2016. Mr Bath held 3,000,000 vested and exercisable unlisted options at date of resignation. These
options will expire 24 August 2016.
For personal use onlyP.38
DIRECTORS’
REPORT
5. KEY MANANGEMENT PERSONNEL TRANSACTIONS
5.1 Other Transactions with Key Management Personnel
Two key management persons, Mr Miller and Mr Bhandari, or their related parties, hold positions in other entities that result in them
having control or joint control over the financial or operation policies of those entities.
These entities transacted with the Group during the year. The terms and conditions of the transactions with key management
personnel and their related parties were no more favourable than those available, or which might reasonably be expected to be
available, on similar transactions to non-key management personnel related entities on an arm’s length basis.
These transactions have all been disclosed in the remuneration table.
5.2 Movements in Shares
The movement during the financial year in the number of ordinary shares in the Company held, directly, indirectly or beneficially, by
each key management person, including their related parties, is as follows:
Held at 1 July 2015
Received on
Exercise of Options
Other Changes (1)
Held at 30 June 2016
J Salomon (2)
M D J Cozijn
B Lingo (3)
S Bhandari (4)
J D Auld (5)
R L Miller (6)
M Bolton (7)
P Bekkers
J Sethi
C Bath (8)
n/a
1,646,340
n/a
8,600,000
-
6,151,388
n/a
400,000
-
1,951,220
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
201,878
-
-
1,219,513
365,854
-
243,903
-
3,390,441
-
1,848,218
-
n/a
n/a
n/a
-
643,903
-
n/a
(1) Other changes represent shares that were purchased or sold during the year and includes participation in August 2015 Rights
Issue and Share Placement.
(2) Mr Salomon appointed 29 November 2015 as a Non-Executive Director and as Managing Director 18 March 2016.
(3) Mr Lingo appointed 11 February 2016.
(4) Mr Bhandari did not stand for re-election at the Annual General Meeting on 25 November 2015.
(5) Mr Auld was not re-elected at the Annual General Meeting on 25 November 2015.
(6) Mr Miller resigned 18 March 2016.
(7) Mr Bolton appointed 3 June 2016.
(8) Mr Bath resigned 24 May 2016.
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.39
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
DIRECTORS’
REPORT
5. KEY MANANGEMENT PERSONNEL TRANSACTIONS (continued)
5.3 Movements in Listed Options
The movement during the financial year in the number of listed options in the Company held, directly, indirectly or beneficially, by
each key management person, including their related parties, is as follows:
Held at 1 July 2015
Purchased
Other Changes (1)
Held at 30 June 2016
J Salomon (2)
M D J Cozijn
B Lingo (3)
S Bhandari (4)
J D Auld (5)
R L Miller (6)
M Bolton (7)
P Bekkers
J Sethi
C Bath (8)
n/a
200,000
n/a
-
-
3,252,500
n/a
200,000
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
n/a
(200,000)
n/a
-
-
(3,252,500)
n/a
(200,000)
-
-
-
-
-
n/a
n/a
n/a
-
-
-
n/a
(1) Other changes represent listed options that expired during the year. All listed options held expired unexercised on
7 September 2015.
(2) Mr Salomon appointed 29 November 2015 as a Non-Executive Director and as Managing Director 18 March 2016.
(3) Mr Lingo appointed 11 February 2016.
(4) Mr Bhandari did not stand for re-election at the Annual General Meeting on 25 November 2015.
(5) Mr Auld was not re-elected at the Annual General Meeting on 25 November 2015.
(6) Mr Miller resigned 18 March 2016.
(7) Mr Bolton appointed 3 June 2016.
(8) Mr Bath resigned 24 May 2016.
END OF REMUNERATION REPORT – AUDITED
Mr Max Cozijn
Chairman
Mr Jonathan Salomon
Managing Director
Signed in accordance with a resolution of the Directors.
West Perth
Western Australia
29 September 2016
For personal use onlyP.40
LEAD AUDITOR’S
INDEPENDENCE DECLARATION
Lead Auditor’s Independence Declaration under Section 307C of the Corporations Act 2001
To: the directors of Oilex Ltd
I declare that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, in relation to the audit for the financial year ended 30 June 2016 there
have been:
(i) no contraventions of the auditor independence requirements as set out in the Corporations Act 2001 in relation to the audit;
and
(ii) no contraventions of any applicable code of professional conduct in relation to the audit.
KPMG
Graham Hogg
Partner
Perth
29 September 2016
KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member
firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative
(“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity.
Liability limited by a scheme approved under
Professional Standards Legislation.
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.41
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF PROFIT OR
LOSS AND OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
Revenue
Cost of sales
Gross loss
Other income
Exploration expenditure
Impairment of exploration and evaluation assets
Impairment of development assets
Administration expense
Share-based payments expense
Other expenses
Results from operating activities
Finance income
Finance costs
Foreign exchange (loss)/gain
Net finance (loss)/income
Loss before tax
Income tax expense
Loss
Other comprehensive income
Items that may be reclassified to profit or loss
Foreign operations - foreign currency translation differences
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
Note
6(a)
6(b)
6(c)
12
13
6(d)
19
6(e)
6(f)
2016
$
2015
$
446,132
(1,080,512)
(634,380)
290,294
(498,390)
(208,096)
1,281
331,853
(3,972,848)
(1,304,057)
(11,572,740)
(11,870,051)
(10,023,940)
-
(5,648,298)
(3,078,163)
(149,523)
(3,813,481)
(552,139)
(900,828)
(35,813,929)
(17,581,481)
62,228
(309)
(402,101)
(340,182)
39,426
(256)
153,787
192,957
(36,154,111)
(17,388,524)
7
-
-
(36,154,111)
(17,388,524)
1,143,897
1,143,897
5,260,588
5,260,588
Total comprehensive loss
(35,010,214)
(12,127,936)
Earnings per share
Basic loss per share (cents per share)
Diluted loss per share (cents per share)
8
8
(3.2)
(3.2)
(2.7)
(2.7)
The above Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income is to be read in conjunction with the
accompanying notes.
For personal use onlyP.42
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
AS AT 30 JUNE 2016
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Prepayments
Inventories
Total current assets
Trade and other receivables
Exploration and evaluation
Development assets
Property, plant and equipment
Total non-current assets
Total assets
Liabilities
Trade and other payables
Employee benefits
Provisions
Total current liabilities
Provisions
Total non-current liabilities
Total liabilities
Net assets
Equity
Issued capital
Reserves
Accumulated losses
Total equity
Note
2016
$
2015
$
9
10
11
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
17
18
18
5,158,361
2,235,737
79,441
1,238,553
8,712,092
1,187,158
3,575,545
595,587
1,249,482
6,607,772
102,343
909,593
98,958
11,644,674
6,139,004
15,647,996
263,400
280,151
7,414,340
27,671,779
16,126,432
34,279,551
2,914,769
356,510
181,794
3,673,015
406,843
-
3,453,073
4,079,858
3,344,385
3,344,385
3,595,742
3,595,742
6,797,458
7,675,600
9,328,974
26,603,951
171,513,760
153,928,046
8,425,861
8,693,281
(170,610,647)
(136,017,376)
9,328,974
26,603,951
The above Consolidated Statement of Financial Position is to be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.43
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
Attributable to Owners of the Company
Issued
Capital
$
Option
Reserve
$
Foreign Currency
Translation
Reserve
$
Accumulated
Losses
$
Total Equity
$
Balance at 30 June 2014
149,250,072
4,089,004
1,090,634
(121,075,468)
33,354,242
Total comprehensive (loss)/income
Loss
Other comprehensive income
Foreign currency translation differences
Total other comprehensive income
Total comprehensive (loss)/income
Transactions with owners of the Company
Contributions and distributions
Shares issued
Capital raising costs (1)
-
-
-
-
4,362,379
-
-
-
-
-
(778,751)
147,532
Shares issued on exercise of listed options
1,094,346
-
Transfer on exercise of options
Transfers on forfeited options
Share-based payment transactions
-
-
-
(38,414)
(2,408,202)
552,139
Total transactions with owners of the Company
4,677,974
(1,746,945)
-
(17,388,524)
(17,388,524)
5,260,588
5,260,588
-
-
5,260,588
5,260,588
5,260,588
(17,388,524)
(12,127,936)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4,362,379
(631,219)
1,094,346
38,414
2,408,202
-
-
-
552,139
2,446,616
5,377,645
Balance at 30 June 2015
153,928,046
2,342,059
6,351,222
(136,017,376)
26,603,951
Balance at 30 June 2015
153,928,046
2,342,059
6,351,222
(136,017,376)
26,603,951
Total comprehensive (loss)/income
Loss
Other comprehensive income
Foreign currency translation differences
Total other comprehensive income
Total comprehensive (loss)/income
Transactions with owners of the Company
Contributions and distributions
Shares issued
Capital raising costs
Shares issued on exercise of listed options
Transfer on exercise of options
Transfers on forfeited options
Share-based payment transactions
-
-
-
-
20,589,107
(3,055,535)
52,142
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(1,560,840)
149,523
Total transactions with owners of the Company
17,585,714
(1,411,317)
-
(36,154,111)
(36,154,111)
1,143,897
1,143,897
-
-
1,143,897
1,143,897
1,143,897
(36,154,111)
(35,010,214)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,560,840
20,589,107
(3,055,535)
52,142
-
-
-
149,523
1,560,840
17,735,237
Balance at 30 June 2016
171,513,760
930,742
7,495,119
(170,610,647)
9,328,974
(1) Capital raising costs include cash payments and the fair value of options granted to the underwriter.
The above Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity is to be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
For personal use onlyP.44
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash receipts from customers
Payments to suppliers and employees
Cash outflow from operations
Payments for exploration and evaluation expenses
Cash receipts from government grants
Interest received
Interest paid
Note
2016
$
2015
$
438,993
313,502
(5,720,957)
(3,420,490)
(5,281,964)
(3,106,988)
(5,060,999)
(2,773,193)
325,280
62,867
(309)
358,517
39,403
(256)
Net cash used in operating activities
20
(9,955,125)
(5,482,517)
Cash flows from investing activities
Advances from joint ventures
Payments for capitalised exploration and evaluation
Proceeds from sale of assets and materials
Acquisition of development assets
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment
Net cash used in investing activities
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issue of share capital
Proceeds from exercise of share options
Payment for share issue costs
Net cash from financing activities
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at 1 July
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash held
Cash and cash equivalents at 30 June
9
-
3,158
(1,142,168)
(6,118,722)
3,088
(1,921,290)
600
-
(45,643)
(107,643)
(3,106,013)
(6,222,607)
20,769,192
52,142
4,631,708
1,094,346
(3,551,134)
(400,028)
17,270,200
5,326,026
4,209,062
1,187,158
(237,859)
5,158,361
(6,379,098)
7,455,572
110,684
1,187,158
The above Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows is to be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes.
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.45
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
NOTE 1 – REPORTING ENTITY
Oilex Ltd (the Company) is domiciled in Australia. These
consolidated financial statements comprise the Company and
its subsidiaries (collectively the Group and individually Group
Entities). Oilex Ltd is a company limited by shares incorporated
in Australia whose shares are publicly traded on the Australian
Securities Exchange (ASX) and on the Alternative Investment
Market (AIM) of the London Stock Exchange. The Group is
a for-profit entity and is primarily involved in the exploration,
evaluation, development and production of hydrocarbons.
NOTE 2 – BASIS OF PREPARATION
(a) Statement of Compliance
The consolidated financial statements are general purpose
financial statements which have been prepared in accordance
with Australian Accounting Standards (AASBs) adopted by
the Australian Accounting Standards Board (AASB) and the
Corporations Act 2001. The consolidated financial statements
comply with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)
adopted by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB).
The consolidated financial statements were authorised for issue
by the Board of Directors on 29 September 2016.
In the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies,
judgements, assumptions and estimation uncertainties that have
a significant risk of resulting in a material adjustment within the
next financial year are as follows:
i) Exploration and Evaluation Assets
The Group’s accounting policy for exploration and evaluation
expenditure is set out in note 3(e). The application of this policy
necessarily requires management to make certain estimates
and assumptions as to future events and circumstances,
including, in particular, the assessment of whether economic
quantities of resources have been found, or alternatively, that
the sale of the respective areas of interest will be achieved.
Critical to this assessment are estimates and assumptions as to
contingent and prospective resources, the timing of expected
cash flows, exchange rates, commodity prices and future
capital requirements. These estimates and assumptions may
change as new information becomes available. If, after having
capitalised expenditure under this policy, it is determined that
the expenditure is unlikely to be recovered by future exploitation
or sale, then the relevant capitalised amount will be written
off to the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income. The carrying amounts of exploration and
evaluation assets are set out in note 12.
(b) Basis of Measurement
ii) Reserve Estimates
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared on
the historical cost basis except for the following material items
in the statement of financial position:
»
»
Foreign Currency Translation Reserve; and
Share-based payment arrangements are measured at fair value.
(c) Functional and Presentation Currency
These consolidated financial statements are presented in
Australian dollars, which is the Company’s functional currency.
The functional currency of the majority of the Company’s
subsidiaries is United States dollars.
(d) Key Estimates, Judgements and Assumptions
In preparing these consolidated financial statements,
management continually evaluate judgements, estimates
and assumptions that affect the application of the Group’s
accounting policies and the reported amounts of assets,
liabilities, income and expenses. All judgements, estimates and
assumptions made are believed to be reasonable based on the
most current set of circumstances. Actual results may differ
from these judgements, estimates and assumptions. Estimates
and underlying assumptions are reviewed on an ongoing basis.
Revisions to estimates are recognised prospectively.
Going Concern
A key assumption underlying the preparation of the financial
statements is that the entity will continue as a going concern. An
entity is a going concern when it is considered to be able to pay
its debts as and when they fall due, and to continue in operation,
without any intention or necessity to liquidate or otherwise wind
up its operations. Judgement has been required in assessing
whether the entity is a going concern as set out in note 2(g).
Development costs are amortised on a units of production basis
over the life of economically recoverable reserves, so as to
write off costs in proportion to the depletion of the estimated
reserves. The estimation of reserves requires interpretation of
geological and geophysical data. The geological and economic
factors which form the basis of reserve estimates may change
over reporting periods.
iii) Rehabilitation Provisions
The Group estimates the future removal costs of onshore oil
and gas production facilities, wells and pipeline at the time of
installation of the assets. In most instances, removal of assets
occurs many years into the future. This requires judgemental
assumptions regarding removal date, future environmental
legislation, the extent of reclamation activities required, the
engineering methodology for estimating cost, future removal
technologies in determining the removal cost, and discount
rates to determine the present value of these cash flows. For
more detail regarding the policy in respect of provision for
rehabilitation refer to note 3(l).
iv) Impairment of Assets
The recoverable amount of the Group’s non-financial assets are
reviewed at each reporting date to determine whether there is
any indication of impairment. An impairment loss is recognised
if the carrying amount of an asset or its cash-generating unit
exceeds its estimated recoverable amount. A cash-generating
unit is the smallest identifiable asset group that generates
cash flows that are largely independent from other assets and
groups. Impairment losses are recognised in profit or loss.
For personal use onlyP.46
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
The recoverable amount of an asset or cash-generating unit
is the greater of its value in use and its fair value less costs to
sell. In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows
are discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount
rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value
of money and the risks specific to the asset, as well as the
timing of the cash flows and expected life of the relevant area
of interest, exchange rates, commodity prices, future capital
requirements and future operating performance. Changes
in these estimates and assumptions impact the recoverable
amount of the asset of cash-generating unit, and accordingly
could result in an adjustment to the carrying amount of that
asset or cash-generating unit.
The carrying amounts of development assets are set out in
note 13.
v) Impairment of Receivables
The Group considers evidence of impairment for receivables
at both a specific asset and collective level. All individually
significant receivables are assessed for specific impairment. All
individually significant receivables found not to be specifically
impaired are then collectively assessed for any impairment
that has been incurred but not yet identified. Receivables that
are not individually significant are collectively assessed for
impairment by grouping together receivables with similar risk
characteristics. This requires judgemental assumptions regarding
recoverability. Changes in these assumptions impact the
recoverable amount of the asset.
The Group considers that there is evidence of impairment if any
of the following indicators are present; financial difficulties of the
debtor, probability that the debtor will dispute amounts owing
and default or delinquency in payment (more than one year old).
The carrying amounts of receivables are set out in note 10.
vi) Recognition of Tax Losses
The Group’s accounting policy for deferred taxes is set out in note
3(p). A deferred tax asset is recognised for unused losses only if
it is probable that future taxable profits will be available to utilise
those losses. The application of this policy necessarily requires
management to make certain estimates and assumptions as
to future events and circumstances, including, in particular, the
assessment of whether economic quantities of resources have
been found, or alternatively, that the sale of the respective areas
of interest will be achieved. Any such estimates and assumptions
may change as new information becomes available.
(e) Rounding of Amounts
The Company is a company of the kind referred to in ASIC
Corporations (Rounding in Financial/Directors’ Reports)
Instrument 2016/191 and therefore the amounts contained in
this report and in the financial report have been rounded to the
nearest dollar, unless otherwise stated.
(f) Changes in Accounting Polices
Except for the following changes, the Group has consistently
applied the accounting polices set out in note 3 to all periods
presented in these consolidated financial statements.
»
»
»
AASB 2013-9 Amendments to Australian Accounting
Standards - Conceptual Framework, Materiality and Financial
Instruments.
AASB 2015-3 Amendments to Australian Accounting Standards
arising from the Withdrawal of AASB 1031 Materiality.
AASB 2015-4 Amendments to Australian Accounting
Standards - Financial Reporting Requirements for Australian
Groups with a Foreign Parent.
The adoption of new and amended Standards had no impact on
the financial position or the consolidated financial statements of
the Group.
The Group has not elected to early adopt any other new
or amended AASB’s that are issued but not yet effective
(refer note 3(t)).
(g) Going Concern Basis
The Directors believe it is appropriate to prepare the
consolidated financial statements on a going concern basis,
which contemplates continuity of normal business activities
and the realisation of assets and settlement of liabilities in the
ordinary course of business.
The Group has incurred a loss of $36,154,111, including
$21,596,680 for non-cash impairment of exploration and
development assets, and had cash outflows from operating and
investing activities of $9,955,125 and $3,106,013 respectively.
As at 30 June 2016, the Group’s current assets exceeded
current liabilities by $5,259,019 and the Group has cash and cash
equivalents of $5,158,361.
The Group will continue to manage its expenditure to ensure
that it has sufficient cash reserves for at least the next twelve
months. The Group will require additional funds within the
next twelve months in order to meet planned expenditures
for its projects, including progressing the Cambay Field drilling
programme, and for any new business opportunities that the
Group may acquire, noting that the timing and amount of
discretionary expenditures is able to be varied or deferred as
required, although certain commitments exist in the short and
medium term. The Group may also require, or receive funds, in
relation to its contingent liabilities and assets, refer note 28.
The Directors believe that the Company will be able to secure
sufficient funding to meet the requirements to continue as a
going concern, due to its history of previous capital raisings,
acknowledging that the structure and timing of any capital
raising is dependent upon investor support, prevailing capital
markets, shareholder participation, oil and gas prices and the
outcome of planned exploration and evaluation activities.
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.47
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
NOTE 2 – BASIS OF PREPARATION (continued)
(b) Foreign Currency
(g) Going Concern Basis (continued)
i) Foreign Currency Transactions
The Directors consider the going concern basis of preparation
to be appropriate based on its forecast cash flows for the
next twelve months and that the Group will be in a position to
continue to meet its minimum administrative, evaluation and
development expenditures and commitments for at least twelve
months from the date of this report.
If further funds are not able to be raised or realised, then it may
be necessary for the Group to sell or farmout its exploration and
development assets.
The ability of the Company to achieve its forecast cash flows,
particularly the raising of additional funds, represents a material
uncertainty that may cast significant doubt about whether the
Company can continue as a going concern, in which case it may
not be able to realise its assets and extinguish its liabilities in
the normal course of business and at the stated amounts in the
financial statements.
NOTE 3 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The accounting policies set out below have been applied
consistently to all periods presented in these consolidated
financial statements and have been applied consistently by
Group entities, except as explained in note 2(f) which addresses
any changes in accounting policies.
(a) Basis of Consolidation
i) Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries are entities controlled by the Group. The Group
controls an entity when it is exposed to, or has rights to,
variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has
the ability to affect those returns through its power over the
entity. The financial statements of subsidiaries are included in
the consolidated financial statements from the date that control
commences until the date that control ceases.
ii) Joint Arrangements - Joint Ventures
Joint ventures are those entities over whose activities the Group
has joint control, established by contractual agreement.
iii) Joint Arrangements - Joint Operations
The interests of the Group in unincorporated joint operations and
jointly controlled assets are brought to account by recognising,
in its consolidated financial statements, the assets it controls,
the liabilities that it incurs, the expenses it incurs and the share
of income that it earns from the sale of goods or services by the
joint operations.
iv) Transactions Eliminated on Consolidation
Intragroup balances and transactions, and any unrealised gains
and losses or income and expenses arising from intragroup
transactions, are eliminated in preparing the consolidated
financial statements.
Transactions in foreign currencies are translated into the
respective functional currencies of Group entities at exchange
rates at the dates of the transactions.
Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign
currencies at the reporting date are retranslated to the functional
currency at the foreign exchange rate at that date. The foreign
currency gain or loss on monetary items is the difference
between amortised cost in the functional currency at the
beginning of the period, adjusted for effective interest and
payments during the period, and the amortised cost in foreign
currency translated at the exchange rate at the end of the
reporting period.
Non-monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign
currencies that are measured at fair value are retranslated to
the functional currency at the exchange rate at the date that the
fair value was determined. Foreign currency differences arising
on retranslation are recognised in profit or loss. Non-monetary
items that are measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign
currency are translated using the exchange rate at the date of
the transaction.
ii) Foreign Operations
The assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated to
Australian dollars at exchange rates at the reporting date. The
income and expenses of foreign operations are translated to
Australian dollars at exchange rates at the dates of the transactions.
Foreign currency differences are recognised in other
comprehensive income and presented in the foreign currency
translation reserve (FCTR). When the settlement of a monetary
item receivable from or payable to a foreign operation is
neither planned nor likely in the foreseeable future, foreign
exchange gains and losses arising from such a monetary item
are considered to form part of a net investment in a foreign
operation and are recognised in other comprehensive income
and are presented within equity in the FCTR.
When a foreign operation is disposed of in its entirety or partially
such that control, significant influence or joint control is lost,
the cumulative amount in the translation reserve related to that
foreign operation is reclassified to profit or loss as part of the
gain or loss on disposal.
(c) Financial Instruments
i) Share Capital
Ordinary Shares
Ordinary shares are classified as equity. Incremental costs
directly attributable to the issue of ordinary shares and share
options are recognised as a deduction from equity, net of any
tax effects.
For personal use onlyP.48
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
ii) Non-derivative Financial Assets
(d) Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Group initially recognises loans and receivables and deposits
on the date that they are originated. All other financial assets
(including assets designated at fair value through profit or loss)
are recognised initially on the trade date at which the Group
becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the instrument.
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash balances, call deposits,
cash in transit and short-term deposits with an original maturity of
three months or less from the acquisition date that are subject to
an insignificant risk of changes in their fair value, and are used by
the Group in the management of its short-term commitments.
The Group derecognises a financial asset when the contractual
rights to the cash flows from the asset expire, or it transfers the
rights to receive the contractual cash flows on the financial asset
in a transaction in which substantially all the risks and rewards
of ownership of the financial asset are transferred. Any interest
in transferred financial assets that is created or retained by the
Group is recognised as a separate asset or liability.
Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net amount
presented in the statement of financial position when, and only
when, the Group has a legal right to offset the amounts and
intends either to settle on a net basis or to realise the asset and
settle the liability simultaneously.
The Group has the following non-derivative financial assets:
loans and receivables and cash and cash equivalents
(refer note 3(d)).
Loans and Receivables
Loans and receivables are financial assets with fixed or
determinable payments that are not quoted in an active market.
Such assets are recognised initially at fair value plus any directly
attributable transaction costs. Subsequent to initial recognition
loans and receivables are measured at amortised cost using the
effective interest method, less any impairment losses.
Loans and receivables comprise trade and other receivables.
iii) Non-derivative Financial Liabilities
The Group initially recognises debt securities issued and
subordinated liabilities on the date that they are originated. All
other financial liabilities (including liabilities designated at fair value
through profit or loss) are recognised initially on the trade date at
which the Group becomes a party to the contractual provisions
of the instrument. The Group derecognises a financial liability
when its contractual obligations are discharged or cancelled
or expire. Financial assets and liabilities are offset and the net
amount presented in the statement of financial position when
and only when, the Group has a legal right to offset the amounts
and intends either to settle on a net basis or to realise the asset
and settle the liability simultaneously. The Group classifies
non-derivative financial liabilities into the other financial liabilities
category. Such financial liabilities are recognised initially at fair
value plus any directly attributable transaction costs. Subsequent
to initial recognition these financial liabilities are measured at
amortised cost using the effective interest rate method.
Other financial liabilities comprise trade and other payables.
(e) Exploration and Evaluation Expenditure
Exploration and evaluation of hydrocarbons resources is the
identification and evaluation of oil and gas resources, as well
as the determination of the technical feasibility and commercial
viability of extracting the resources. Exploration and evaluation
expenditure in respect of each area of interest is accounted for
under the successful efforts method. Accounting for exploration
and evaluation expenditure is assessed separately for each area
of interest. An area of interest is an individual geological area
which is considered to constitute a favourable environment for
the presence of hydrocarbon resources or has been proven to
contain such resources.
Expenditure incurred on activities that precede exploration and
evaluation of hydrocarbon resources including all expenditure
incurred prior to securing legal rights to explore an area, is
expensed as incurred.
Exploration licence acquisition costs relating to established oil
and gas exploration areas are capitalised.
The costs of drilling exploration wells are initially capitalised
pending the results of the well. Costs are expensed where the
well does not result in the successful discovery of potentially
economically recoverable reserves.
All other exploration and evaluation expenditure, including general
administration costs, geological and geophysical costs and new
venture expenditure is expensed as incurred, except where:
»
»
The expenditure relates to an exploration discovery for
which, at balance date, an assessment of the existence or
otherwise of economically recoverable reserves is not yet
complete; or
The expenditure relates to an area of interest under which
it is expected that the expenditure will be recouped through
successful development and exploitation, or by sale.
When an oil or gas field has been approved for commercial
development, the accumulated exploration and evaluation costs
are transferred to development expenditure. Amortisation
of capitalised costs is not charged on revenues earned from
production testing.
Impairment of Exploration and Evaluation Expenditure
Exploration and evaluation assets are assessed for impairment
if sufficient data exists to determine technical feasibility and
economic viability or facts and circumstances suggest that the
carrying amount exceeds the recoverable amount.
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.49
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
NOTE 3 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
(g) Joint Arrangements
(e) Exploration and Evaluation Expenditure (continued)
Exploration and evaluation assets are reviewed for impairment if
any of the following facts and circumstances exist:
»
»
»
»
The exploration licence term in the specific area of interest
has expired during the reporting period or will expire in the
near future and it is not anticipated that this will be renewed;
Expenditure on further exploration and evaluation of specific
areas is not budgeted or planned;
Exploration for and evaluation of oil and gas assets in the
specific area has not lead to the discovery of potentially
commercial reserves; or
Sufficient data exists to indicate that the carrying amount
of the exploration and evaluation asset is unlikely to be
recovered in full, either by development or sale.
Exploration and evaluation expenditure is reviewed for impairment
at each reporting date where there is an indication that the
individual geological area may be impaired (refer note 3(i)(ii)).
In the statement of cash flows, those cash flows associated
with capitalised exploration and evaluation expenditure are
classified as cash flows used in investing activities. Exploration
and evaluation expenditure expensed is classified as cash flows
used in operating activities.
(f) Development Expenditure
Development expenditure includes past exploration and
evaluation costs, pre-production development costs,
development drilling, development studies and other subsurface
expenditure pertaining to that area of interest. Costs related
to surface plant and equipment and any associated land and
buildings are accounted for as property, plant and equipment.
The definition of an area of interest for development expenditure
is narrowed from the exploration permit for exploration and
evaluation expenditure to the individual geological area where
the presence of an oil or natural gas field exists, and in most
cases will comprise an individual oil or gas field.
Development expenditure is reviewed for impairment at each
reporting date where there is an indication that the individual
geological area may be impaired (refer note 3(i)(ii)). The carrying
amounts of development assets are set out in note 13.
Amortisation is not charged on costs carried forward in respect
of areas of interest in the development phase until production
commences. When production commences, carried forward
development costs are amortised on a units of production basis
over the life of economically recoverable reserves.
Joint arrangements are arrangements of which two or more
parties have joint control. Joint control is the contractual agreed
sharing of control of the arrangements which exists only when
decisions about the relevant activities required unanimous
consent of the parties sharing control. Joint arrangements are
classified as either a joint operation or joint venture, based on
the rights and obligations arising from the contractual obligations
between the parties to the arrangement.
To the extent the joint arrangement provides the Group with
rights to the individual assets and obligations arising from
the joint arrangement, the arrangement is classified as a joint
operation and as such, the Group recognises its:
»
»
»
»
Assets, including its share of any assets held jointly;
Liabilities, including its share of any liabilities incurred jointly;
Revenue from the sale of its share of the output arising from
the joint operation;
Share of revenue from the sale of the output by the joint
operation; and
»
Expenses, including its share of any expenses incurred jointly.
The Group’s interest in unincorporated entities are classified as
joint operations.
Joint Ventures provides the Group a right to the net assets of
the venture and are accounted for using the equity method. The
Group currently has no joint venture arrangements.
(h) Inventories
Inventories comprising materials and consumables and
petroleum products are measured at the lower of cost and net
realisable value. Net realisable value is the estimated selling
price in the ordinary course of business, less the estimated
costs of completion and selling expenses.
(i) Impairment
i) Non-derivative Financial Assets (including receivables)
A financial asset not carried at fair value through profit or loss
is assessed at each reporting date to determine whether there
is objective evidence that it is impaired. A financial asset is
impaired if objective evidence indicates that a loss event has
occurred after the initial recognition of the asset, and that the
loss event had a negative effect on the estimated future cash
flows of that asset that can be estimated reliably. Objective
evidence that financial assets are impaired can include default or
delinquency by a debtor, restructuring of an amount due to the
Group on terms that the Group would not consider otherwise,
indications that a debtor or issuer will enter bankruptcy or the
disappearance of an active market for a security.
For personal use onlyP.50
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
(j) Employee Benefits
i) Short-term Employee Benefits
Short-term employee benefits for wages, salaries and fringe
benefits are measured on an undiscounted basis and expensed
as the related service is provided. A liability is recognised based
on remuneration wage and salary rates that the Group expects to
pay as at the reporting date as a result of past service provided by
the employee, if the obligation can be measured reliably.
ii) Long-term Employee Benefits
The Group’s net obligation in respect of long-term service
benefits is the amount of future benefit that employees have
earned in return for their service in the current and prior
periods. The obligation is calculated using expected future
increases in wage and salary rates including related on-costs
and expected settlement dates, and is discounted using the
high quality corporate bond rate at the balance sheet date which
have maturity dates approximating to the terms of the Group’s
obligations.
iii) Share-based Payment Transactions
Options allow directors, employees and advisors to acquire shares
of the Company. The fair value of options granted is recognised
as an employee expense with a corresponding increase in
equity. The fair value is measured at grant date and spread over
the period during which the employees become unconditionally
entitled to the options. Options are also provided as part of
consideration for services by financiers and advisors. The fair
value of the options granted is measured using the Black-Scholes
Model, taking into account the terms and conditions upon which
the options were granted. The amount recognised as an expense
is adjusted to reflect the actual number of share options that vest
except where forfeiture is only due to share prices not achieving
the threshold for vesting.
When the Group grants options over its shares to employees
of subsidiaries, the fair value at grant date is recognised as an
increase in the investments in subsidiaries, with a corresponding
increase in equity over the vesting period of the grant.
(k) Product Revenue
Revenue is recognised when the significant risks and rewards
of ownership have transferred to the buyer. Risks and rewards
of ownership are considered passed to the buyer at the time of
delivery of the product to the customer. Revenues from test
production are accounted for as revenue. All revenue is stated
net of the amount of Goods and Services Tax (GST).
The Group considers evidence of impairment for receivables
at both a specific asset and collective level. All individually
significant receivables are assessed for specific impairment. All
individually significant receivables found not to be specifically
impaired are then collectively assessed for any impairment that
has been incurred but not yet identified. Receivables that are not
individually significant are collectively assessed for impairment by
grouping together receivables with similar risk characteristics.
In assessing collective impairment the Group uses historical
trends of the probability of default, timing of recoveries and the
amount of loss incurred, adjusted for management’s judgement
as to whether current economic and credit conditions are
such that the actual losses are likely to be greater or less than
suggested by historical trends.
An impairment loss in respect of a financial asset measured
at amortised cost is calculated as the difference between its
carrying amount and the present value of the estimated future
cash flows discounted at the asset’s original effective interest
rate. Losses are recognised in profit or loss and reflected in an
allowance account against receivables. Interest on the impaired
asset continues to be recognised through the unwinding of
the discount. When a subsequent event causes the amount of
impairment loss to decrease, the decrease in impairment loss is
reversed through profit or loss.
ii) Non-financial Assets
The carrying amounts of the Group’s non-financial assets, other
than inventories and deferred tax assets, are reviewed at each
reporting date to determine whether there is any indication
of impairment. If any such indication exists then the asset’s
recoverable amount is estimated. Exploration and evaluation assets
are assessed for impairment in accordance with note 3(e) and
development assets are impaired in accordance with note 3(f).
An impairment loss is recognised if the carrying amount of
an asset or its cash-generating unit exceeds its estimated
recoverable amount. A cash-generating unit is the smallest
identifiable asset group that generates cash flows that are
largely independent from other assets and groups. Impairment
losses are recognised in profit or loss.
The recoverable amount of an asset or cash-generating unit is
the greater of its value in use and its fair value less costs to sell.
In assessing value in use, the estimated future cash flows are
discounted to their present value using a pre-tax discount rate
that reflects current market assessments of the time value of
money and the risks specific to the asset.
Impairment losses recognised in prior periods are assessed at
each reporting date for any indications that the loss has decreased
or no longer exists. An impairment loss is reversed if there has
been a change in the estimate used to determine the recoverable
amount. An impairment loss is reversed only to the extent
that the asset’s carrying amount does not exceed the carrying
amount that would have been determined, net of depreciation or
amortisation, if no impairment loss had been recognised.
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.51
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
NOTE 3 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
(l) Provisions
Provisions are recognised when the Group has a present
obligation (legal or constructive) as a result of a past event,
and it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be
required to settle the obligation and when a reliable estimate
can be made of the amount of the obligation. Provisions are
determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at
a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the
time value of money and where appropriate, the risks specific to
the liability.
Provisions are made for site rehabilitation of an oil and gas field
on an incremental basis during the life of the field (which includes
the field plant closure phase). Provisions include reclamation,
plant closure, waste site closure and monitoring activities. These
costs have been determined on the basis of current costs, current
legal requirements and current technology. At each reporting date
the rehabilitation provision is re-measured to reflect any changes
in the timing or amounts of the costs to be incurred. Any such
changes are dealt with on a prospective basis.
(m) Leases
Payments made under operating leases are recognised in profit
or loss on a straight line basis over the term of the lease. Lease
incentives received are recognised as an integral part of the total
lease expense and are allocated over the lease term.
(n) Finance Income and Finance Costs
Finance income comprises interest income on funds invested.
Interest income is recognised as it accrues in profit or loss,
using the effective interest method. Finance costs comprise
interest expense on borrowings and unrealised foreign exchange
losses. Foreign currency gains and losses are reported on a net
basis as either finance income or finance cost depending on
whether foreign currency movements are in a net gain or net
loss position.
(o) Property, Plant and Equipment
i) Recognition and Measurement
Items of property, plant and equipment are measured at cost
less accumulated depreciation and any accumulated impairment
losses. The cost of self-constructed assets includes the cost of
materials, direct labour, the initial estimate, where relevant, of
the costs of dismantling and removing the items and restoring
the site on which they are located and an appropriate proportion
of overheads.
Gains and losses on disposal of an item of property, plant
and equipment are determined by comparing the proceeds
from disposal with the carrying amount of property, plant and
equipment and are recognised net within other income in profit
or loss.
ii) Subsequent Costs
The cost of replacing part of an item of property, plant and
equipment is recognised in the carrying amount of the item if it
is probable that the future economic benefits embodied within
the part will flow to the Group and its cost can be measured
reliably. Ongoing repairs and maintenance is expensed as
incurred.
iii) Depreciation
Depreciation is recognised in profit or loss using the reducing
balance method over the estimated useful life of the assets,
with the exception of software which is depreciated at prime
cost. The estimated useful lives in the current and comparative
periods are as follows:
» Motor vehicles
4 to 7 years
»
Plant and equipment
2 to 7 years
» Office furniture
2 to 10 years
Depreciation methods, useful lives and residual values are
reviewed and adjusted if appropriate, at each financial year end.
(p) Income Tax
Income tax expense comprises current and deferred tax.
Income tax is recognised in profit or loss except to the extent
that it relates to a business combination, or items recognised
directly in equity, or in other comprehensive income.
Current tax is the expected tax payable on the taxable income
for the year, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at
the reporting date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect
of previous years.
In determining the amount of current and deferred tax the
Group takes into account the impact of uncertain tax positions
and whether additional taxes and interest may be due. The
Group believes that its accruals for tax liabilities are adequate
for all open tax years based on its assessment of many factors,
including interpretations of tax law and prior experience. This
assessment relies on estimates and assumptions and may
involve a series of judgements about future events. New
information may become available that causes the Group to
change its judgement regarding the adequacy of existing tax
liabilities, such changes to tax liabilities will impact tax expense
in the period that such a determination is made.
For personal use onlyP.52
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
Cash flows are included in the consolidated statement of
cash flows on a gross basis and the GST component of cash
flows arising from investing and financing activities, which
is recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority, is
classified as operating cash flows.
Commitments and contingencies are disclosed net of the amount
of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the taxation authority.
(r) Government Grants
Grants from the government are recognised as a receivable
at their fair value when there is reasonable assurance that the
grant will be received and the Group will comply with all the
attached conditions.
Government grants that compensate the group for expenses
incurred are recognised as other income in profit or loss on a
systematic basis in the same period in which the expenses
are recognised.
Government grants relating to exploration and evaluation assets
are deducted against the carrying amount of these assets. The
grants are then recognised in profit or loss on a systematic basis
over the useful life of the asset.
(s) Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is calculated as net profit or
loss attributable to members of the Group, divided by the
weighted average number of ordinary shares, adjusted for any
bonus element.
Diluted earnings per share is determined by adjusting the profit
attributable to ordinary shareholders and weighted average
number of shares outstanding for the effects of all dilutive
potential ordinary shares, which comprise share options granted
to employees.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset if there is a legally
enforceable right to offset current tax liabilities and assets, and
they relate to income taxes levied by the same tax authority on
the same taxable entity, or on different tax entities, but they
intend to settle current tax liabilities and assets on a net basis or
their tax assets and liabilities will be realised simultaneously.
Deferred tax is recognised in respect of temporary differences
between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for
financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for taxation
purposes. Deferred tax is not recognised for differences
relating to investments in subsidiaries to the extent that they
probably will not reverse in the foreseeable future. Deferred
tax is measured at the tax rates that are expected to be applied
to the temporary differences when they reverse, based on the
laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the
reporting date.
A deferred tax asset is recognised to the extent that it is
probable that future taxable profits will be available against
which the temporary difference can be utilised. Deferred tax
assets are reviewed at each reporting date and reduced to the
extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit
will be realised.
The Company and its wholly-owned Australian resident entities
formed a tax-consolidated group with effect from 1 July 2004
and are therefore taxed as a single entity from that date. The
head entity within the tax-consolidated group is Oilex Ltd.
Current tax expense/income, deferred tax liabilities and deferred
tax assets arising from temporary differences of the members
of the tax-consolidated group are recognised in the separate
financial statements of the members of the tax-consolidated
group using the ‘separate taxpayer within group’ approach by
reference to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in the
separate financial statements of each entity and the tax values
applying under tax consolidation.
(q) Goods and Services Tax and Other Indirect Taxes
Revenues, expenses and assets are recognised net of the
amount of good and services tax (GST) except:
» When the GST incurred on a purchase of goods and services
is not recoverable from the taxation authority, in which case
the GST is recognised as part of the cost of acquisition of
the asset or as part of the expense item as applicable; and
»
Receivables and payables, which are stated with the amount
of GST included.
The net amount of GST recoverable from, or payable to, the
taxation authority is included as part of receivables or payables
in the consolidated statement of financial position.
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.53
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
NOTE 3 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
»
(t) New Standards and Interpretations Not Yet Adopted
The following standards, amendments to standards and
interpretations have been identified as those which may impact the
entity in the period of initial application. They are not yet effective
and have not been applied in preparing this financial report.
»
»
»
»
AASB 9 Financial Instruments replaces the existing
guidance in AASB 139 Financial Instruments: Recognition
and Measurement. AASB 9 includes requirements in the
areas of classification and measurement, impairment, hedge
accounting and derecognition. AASB 9 is effective for annual
periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018 with early
adoption permitted. The adoption of AASB 9 is not expected
to have a material impact on the Group’s financial assets or
financial liabilities.
AASB 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers
provides a single, principles based five-step model to
be applied to all contracts with customers. Guidance is
provided for determining whether, how much and when
revenue is recognised. New disclosures about revenue are
also introduced. AASB 15 is effective for annual periods
beginning on or after 1 January 2018 with early adoption
permitted. The adoption of AASB 15 is not expected to have
a material impact on the Group’s revenue.
AASB 16 Leases provides a new lessee accounting model
requiring the recognition of assets and liabilities for all
leases with a term greater than 12 months, unless the
underlying asset is of low value. AASB 16 is effective
for annual periods beginning on or after 1 January 2019
with early adoption permitted. The impact on the Group’s
financial assets and financial liabilities of the adoption of
AASB 16 has yet to be determined.
AASB 2014-4 Clarification of Acceptable Methods of
Depreciation and Amortisation (amendments to AASB 116
and ASBB 138) clarifies that a depreciation method that
is based on revenue that is generated by an activity that
includes the use of an asset is not appropriate for property,
plant and equipment and is effective for annual reporting
periods beginning on or after 1 July 2016.
»
»
»
AASB 2014-3 Amendments to Australian Accounting
Standards - Accounting for Acquisitions of Interests in
Joint Operations sets out the guidance on the accounting
for acquisition of interests in joint operations in which the
activity constitutes a business and is effective for annual
reporting periods beginning on or after 1 July 2016.
AASB 2015-1 Amendments to Australian Accounting
Standards - Annual Improvements to Australian Accounting
Standards 2012 - 2014 Cycle - sets out clarification of
amendments to existing accounting standards.
AASB 2015-2 Amendments to Australian Accounting
Standards - Disclosure Initiative: Amendments to AASB 101.
The standard makes amendments to AASB 101 Presentation
to Financial Statements arising from the IASB’s Disclosure
Initiative project. The amendments encourage preparers
to exercise judgement in presenting their financial reports.
The amendments make clear that materiality applies to the
financial statements and that the inclusion of immaterial
information can inhibit the usefulness of financial disclosures.
The amendments clarify that judgement should be used
in determining where and in what order information is
presented in the financial disclosures and is effective for
annual reporting periods beginning on or after 1 January 2016.
AASB 2016-5 Amendments to Australian Accounting
Standards - Classification and Measurement of Share-based
Payment Transactions. The standard makes amendments
to AASB 2 Share-based Payment. The amendments address
the accounting for the effects of vesting and non-vesting
conditions and the accounting for a modification to the
terms and conditions of a share-based payment that
changes the classification of the transaction from cash-
settled to equity-settled, and is effective for annual reporting
periods beginning on or after 1 January 2018.
The potential effect of these Standards is yet to be fully
determined, however it is not expected that these will have a
significant impact on the consolidated financial statements.
For personal use onlyP.54
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
NOTE 4 – DETERMINATION OF FAIR VALUES
NOTE 5 – OPERATING SEGMENTS
A number of the Group’s accounting policies and disclosures
require the determination of fair value, for both financial and non-
financial assets and liabilities. Fair values have been determined
for measurement and/or disclosure purposes based on the
following methods. Where applicable, further information about
the assumptions made in determining fair values is disclosed in
the notes specific to that asset or liability.
Trade and Other Receivables
The fair value of trade and other receivables is estimated as the
present value of future cash flows, discounted at the market
rate of interest at the reporting date. Short term receivables
with no stated interest rate are measured at the original invoice
amount if the effect of discounting is immaterial.
Non-derivative Financial Liabilities
Fair value of trade and other payables, which is determined for
disclosure purposes, is calculated based on the present value
of future principal and interest cash flows, discounted at the
market rate of interest at the reporting date.
Share-based Payment Transactions
The fair value of options is measured using the Black-
Scholes Model. Measurement inputs include share price on
measurement date, exercise price of the instrument, expected
volatility (based on weighted average historic volatility adjusted
for changes expected due to publicly available information),
weighted average expected life of the instruments (based on
historical experience and general option holder behaviour),
expected dividends and the risk-free interest rate. Service and
non-market performance conditions attached to the transactions
are not taken into account in determining fair value.
An operating segment is a component of the Group that
engages in business activities from which it may earn revenues
and incur expenses, including revenues and expenses that relate
to transactions with any of the Group’s other components.
The Group has identified its operating segments based upon
the internal management reports that are reviewed and used
by the executive management team in assessing performance
and that are used to allocate the Group’s resources. The
operating segments identified by management are based
on the geographical location of the business which are as
follows: India, Australia, Joint Petroleum Development Area and
Indonesia. Each managed segment has responsible officers
that are accountable to the Managing Director (the Group’s chief
operating decision maker). All operating segments’ operating
results are regularly reviewed by the Group’s Managing
Director to make decisions about resources to be allocated
to the segment and assess its performance and for which
discrete financial information is available. Segment results that
are reported to the Managing Director include items directly
attributable to a segment as well as those that can be allocated
on a reasonable basis.
The Group’s executive management team evaluates the
financial performance of the Group and its segments principally
with reference to revenues, production costs, expenditure on
exploration evaluation and development costs.
The Group undertakes the exploration, development and
production of hydrocarbons and its revenue from the sale of oil
and gas. Information reported to the Group’s chief operating
decision maker is on a geographical basis.
Financing requirements, finance income and expenses are
managed at a Group level. Other items include non-segmental
revenue, expenses and associated assets and liabilities not
allocated to operating segments, mostly comprising corporate
assets (primarily the Company’s headquarters), head office
expenses and income tax assets and liabilities. It also includes
expenses incurred by non-operating segments, such as new
ventures and those undergoing relinquishment.
Major Customer
The Group’s most significant customer is Enertech Fuel
Solutions Pvt Limited with gas sales representing 77% of
the Group’s total revenues (2015: 2%). Indian Oil Corporation
Limited, in its capacity as nominee of the Government of India,
represents 23% of the Group’s total revenues from sale of oil
(2015: 98%).
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.55
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
NOTE 5 – OPERATING SEGMENTS (continued)
India
Australia
2016
$
2015
$
2016
$
2015
$
JPDA (1)
2016
$
JPDA (1)
2015
$
Indonesia
Corporate (2)
Consolidated
2016
$
2015
$
2016
$
2015
$
2016
$
2015
$
Revenue
External revenue
Cost of sales
Production costs
446,132
290,294
(1,027,166)
(467,938)
Amortisation of development assets
Movement in oil stocks inventory
Total cost of sales
Gross loss
(46,652)
(6,694)
(1,080,512)
(634,380)
Exploration expenditure expensed
(3,082,482)
-
(30,452)
(498,390)
(208,096)
(173,232)
Impairment of exploration
and expenditure
(11,572,740)
(11,870,051)
Impairment of development assets
(10,023,940)
(38,251)
(8,543)
1,242
-
(28,990)
(84,701)
-
(3,719,178)
(493,558)
Depreciation
Share-based payments
Other income
Other expenses
Reportable segment profit/(loss)
before income tax
Net finance income
Foreign exchange (loss)/gain
Income tax expense
Loss for the period
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(391,405)
(1,011,978)
(299,831)
(73,341)
(182,018)
(42,458)
(17,112)
(3,048)
(3,972,848)
(1,304,057)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,170
(10,138)
(10,043)
(21,638)
(24,115)
(5,642,998)
(3,380,967)
(9,393,952)
(3,908,683)
(29,576)
(140,980)
(1,131)
(41,318)
(467,438)
331,853
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
446,132
290,294
(1,027,166)
(467,938)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(46,652)
(6,694)
(1,080,512)
(634,380)
(10,023,940)
(67,827)
(149,523)
1,281
(11,572,740)
(11,870,051)
(30,452)
(498,390)
(208,096)
(70,308)
(552,139)
331,853
-
-
-
61,919
(402,101)
-
39,170
153,787
(36,154,111)
(17,388,524)
(29,078,272)
(12,858,628)
(391,405)
(1,011,978)
(308,799)
(83,384)
(203,656)
(66,573)
(5,831,797)
(3,560,918)
(35,813,929)
(17,581,481)
Segment assets
Segment liabilities
10,638,650
31,017,658
374,226
383,582
4,640,250
5,525,769
-
-
45,561
6,196
294,264
7,900
232,011
285,530
5,067,995
1,919,001
2,584,047
1,856,401
16,126,432
34,279,551
6,797,458
7,675,600
There were no significant inter-segment transactions during the year.
(1) Joint Petroleum Development Area.
(2) Corporate represents a reconciliation of reportable segment revenues, profit or loss, assets and liabilities to the
consolidated figure.
For personal use onlyP.56
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
NOTE 5 – OPERATING SEGMENTS (continued)
Revenue
External revenue
Cost of sales
Production costs
446,132
290,294
(1,027,166)
(467,938)
Amortisation of development assets
Movement in oil stocks inventory
Total cost of sales
Gross loss
(46,652)
(6,694)
(1,080,512)
(634,380)
Impairment of exploration
and expenditure
(11,572,740)
(11,870,051)
Impairment of development assets
(10,023,940)
Depreciation
Share-based payments
Other income
Other expenses
Reportable segment profit/(loss)
(38,251)
(8,543)
1,242
(30,452)
(498,390)
(208,096)
(173,232)
(28,990)
(84,701)
-
-
-
Net finance income
Foreign exchange (loss)/gain
Income tax expense
Loss for the period
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,170
(10,138)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
India
Australia
2016
$
2015
$
2016
$
2015
$
JPDA (1)
2016
$
JPDA (1)
2015
$
Indonesia
Corporate (2)
Consolidated
2016
$
2015
$
2016
$
2015
$
2016
$
2015
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
446,132
290,294
(1,027,166)
(467,938)
(46,652)
(6,694)
(1,080,512)
(634,380)
-
(30,452)
(498,390)
(208,096)
Exploration expenditure expensed
(3,082,482)
(391,405)
(1,011,978)
(299,831)
(73,341)
(182,018)
(42,458)
(17,112)
(3,048)
(3,972,848)
(1,304,057)
before income tax
(29,078,272)
(12,858,628)
(391,405)
(1,011,978)
(308,799)
(83,384)
(203,656)
(66,573)
(5,831,797)
(3,560,918)
(35,813,929)
(17,581,481)
(3,719,178)
(493,558)
(10,043)
(21,638)
(24,115)
(5,642,998)
(3,380,967)
(9,393,952)
(3,908,683)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
(29,576)
(140,980)
(1,131)
-
-
(41,318)
(467,438)
331,853
(11,572,740)
(11,870,051)
(10,023,940)
(67,827)
(149,523)
1,281
-
(70,308)
(552,139)
331,853
61,919
(402,101)
-
39,170
153,787
-
(36,154,111)
(17,388,524)
Segment assets
Segment liabilities
10,638,650
31,017,658
374,226
383,582
4,640,250
5,525,769
45,561
6,196
294,264
7,900
-
-
232,011
285,530
5,067,995
1,919,001
2,584,047
1,856,401
16,126,432
34,279,551
6,797,458
7,675,600
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.57
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
NOTE 6 – REVENUE AND EXPENSES
Loss from ordinary activities before income tax has been determined after the following revenues and expenses:
(a) Revenue
Oil sales
Gas sales
(b) Cost of Sales
Production costs
Amortisation of development assets
Movement in oil stocks inventory
(c) Other Income
Profit on disposal of other assets
Workers compensation proceeds
Government grants - research and development
(d) Administration Expenses
Employee benefits expense
Administration expense
Zeta Resources Limited settlement and legal costs
Note
2016
$
100,405
345,727
446,132
2015
$
284,805
5,489
290,294
(1,027,166)
(467,938)
(46,652)
(6,694)
(1,080,512)
-
(30,452)
(498,390)
1,281
-
-
1,281
-
6,573
325,280
331,853
(1,347,773)
(919,352)
(2,815,532)
(2,158,811)
(1,484,993)
-
(5,648,298)
(3,078,163)
Zeta Resources Limited settlement and legal costs reported above exclude any potential recovery from an insurance claim.
Refer note 28.
(e) Other Expenses
Depreciation provision
Doubtful debts provision
Well abandonment adjustment/(expense)
Loss on disposal of other assets
(f) Foreign Exchange (Loss)/Gain
Foreign exchange (loss)/gain - realised
Foreign exchange (loss)/gain - unrealised
14
10
(67,827)
(3,941,988)
196,334
-
(70,308)
(743,383)
(52,950)
(34,187)
(3,813,481)
(900,828)
(166,388)
(235,713)
(402,101)
34,724
119,063
153,787
For personal use onlyP.58
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
NOTE 7 – INCOME TAX EXPENSE
Numerical reconciliation between tax expense and pre-tax accounting loss:
Loss before income tax
Income tax using the domestic corporation tax rate of 30% (2015: 30%)
Effect of tax rate in foreign jurisdictions
Non-deductible expenses
Share-based payments
Foreign expenditure non-deductible
Non-deductible foreign impairment expenditure
Other non-deductible expenses
Non-assessable income
Government grants - research and development
2016
$
2015
$
(36,154,111)
(17,388,524)
(10,846,233)
(5,216,557)
(3,501,373)
(1,627,757)
44,857
1,469,010
6,479,004
735,922
165,642
844,186
(1,935,149)
365,073
-
(97,584)
(5,618,813)
(7,502,146)
Unrecognised deferred tax assets generated during the year and not
brought to account at balance date as realisation is not regarded as probable
5,618,813
7,502,146
Income tax expense
Unrecognised deferred tax assets not brought to account at balance date as
realisation is not regarded as probable – temporary differences
Other
Losses available for offset against future taxable income
Deferred tax asset not brought to account
-
-
2016
$
2015
$
27,174,420
23,425,978
15,157,350
11,092,871
42,331,770
34,518,849
The deductible temporary differences and tax losses do not expire under current tax legislation.
The deferred tax asset not brought to account for the 2016 financial year will only be realised if:
»
»
»
It is probable that future assessable income will be derived of a nature and of an amount sufficient to enable the benefit
to be realised;
The conditions for deductibility imposed by the tax legislation continue to be complied with; and
The companies are able to meet the continuity of ownership and/or continuity of business tests.
The foreign component of the deferred tax asset not brought to account for the 2016 financial year will only be realised if the
Group derives future assessable income of a nature and of an amount sufficient to enable the benefit to be realised and the Group
continues to comply with the deductibility conditions imposed by the Income Tax Act 1961 (India) and there is no change in income
tax legislation adversely affecting the utilisation of the benefits.
Tax Consolidation
In accordance with tax consolidation legislation the Company, as the head entity of the Australian tax-consolidated group, has
assumed the deferred tax assets initially recognised by members of the tax-consolidated group. Total tax losses of the Australian tax-
consolidated group, available for offset against future taxable income are $7,222,073 (2015: $7,117,062).
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.59
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
NOTE 8 – LOSS PER SHARE
(a) Basic Loss Per Share
The calculation of basic loss per share at 30 June 2016 was based on the loss for the period attributable to ordinary shareholders
of $36,154,111 (2015: loss of $17,388,524) and a weighted average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the financial year
ended 30 June 2016 of 1,124,360,627 (2015: 647,558,014), calculated as follows:
i) Loss Attributable to Ordinary Shareholders
Loss for the Period
ii) Weighted Average Number of Ordinary Shares
Issued ordinary shares at 1 July
Effect of shares issued
Effect of share options exercised
Weighted average number of ordinary shares at 30 June
2016
$
2015
$
36,154,111
17,388,524
2016
Number
2015
Number
677,906,039
593,384,789
446,449,448
47,534,497
5,140
6,638,728
1,124,360,627
647,558,014
(b) Diluted Loss Per Share
The Company’s potential ordinary shares, being its options granted, are not considered dilutive as the conversion of these options
and rights would result in a decrease in the net loss per share.
NOTE 9 – CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash at bank and on hand
5,158,361
1,187,158
The Group’s exposure to interest rate risk and a sensitivity analysis for financial assets and liabilities are disclosed in note 22.
2016
$
2015
$
For personal use only
P.60
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
NOTE 10 – TRADE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES
Current
Allocation of receivables
Joint venture receivables
Other receivables
Joint venture receivables
Joint venture receivables
Provision for doubtful debts
Other receivables
Corporate receivables
Provision for doubtful debts
Non-current
Other receivables - India TDS (tax deducted at source)
2016
$
2015
$
1,583,668
652,069
2,235,737
2,459,323
1,116,222
3,575,545
6,169,854
3,242,242
(4,586,186)
(782,919)
1,583,668
2,459,323
732,577
(80,508)
652,069
1,116,222
-
1,116,222
102,343
102,343
98,958
98,958
Joint venture receivables include the Group’s share of outstanding cash calls and recharges owing from the joint venture partners.
The Group considers that there is evidence of impairment if any of the following indicators are present; financial difficulties of the
debtor, probability that the debtor will dispute amounts owing and default or delinquency in payment (more than one year old). Whilst
the Group has been in discussions with its joint venture partner Gujarat State Petroleum Corporation, for repayment of disputed
and other amounts owing, in line with identified impairment indicators, the balance of Cambay cash calls receivable relating to the
2014/2015 work programme, as well as the current financial period, has been fully provided for in the current period.
The Group is continuing discussions in order to resolve the outstanding issues and recover the outstanding amounts.
Details of the Group’s credit risk are disclosed in note 22(b).
Movement in provision for doubtful debts
Balance at 1 July
Provisions made during the year
Effect of movements in exchange rates
Balance at 30 June
Allocation of provision
Joint venture receivables
Other receivables
2016
$
2015
$
(782,919)
(3,941,988)
58,213
(4,666,694)
-
(743,383)
(39,536)
(782,919)
(4,586,186)
(782,919)
(80,508)
-
(4,666,694)
(782,919)
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.61
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
NOTE 11 – INVENTORIES
Oil on hand - net realisable value
Drilling inventory - net realisable value
There were no reversal of writedowns to net realisable value.
NOTE 12 – EXPLORATION AND EVALUATION
Balance at 1 July
Expenditure capitalised
Transfer to development assets
Impairment of exploration and evaluation expenditure
Effect of movements in foreign exchange rates
Balance at 30 June
2016
$
2015
$
7,949
1,230,604
1,238,553
14,034
1,235,448
1,249,482
2016
$
2015
$
11,644,674
26,320,952
469,190
3,503,305
(193,585)
(12,828,857)
(11,572,740)
(11,870,051)
562,054
909,593
6,519,325
11,644,674
During the 2016 financial year the Bhandut gas production facilities were completed and designated as production (2015: undergoing
construction and designated as exploration and evaluation) and were therefore transferred to development assets during the year
ended 30 June 2016.
During the financial year Cambay-72, Cambay-19z and the initial acquisition costs of the Indian assets were fully impaired following
an internal evaluation which showed that these assets were unlikely to recover costs capitalised to date. As a consequence of this
assessment $11,572,740 (2015: $11,870,051) was impaired as at 31 December 2015.
The remaining Cambay Field is currently under evaluation. It has minimal production that is sold to a third party.
Exploration and evaluation assets are reviewed at each reporting date to determine whether there is any indication of impairment
or reversal of impairment, refer note 3(e). When a well does not result in the successful discovery of potentially economically
recoverable reserves, or if sufficient data exists to indicate the carrying amount of the exploration and evaluation asset is unlikely to
be recovered in full, either by development or sale, it is impaired.
For personal use onlyP.62
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
NOTE 13 – DEVELOPMENT ASSETS
Cost
Opening balance
Transfer from exploration
Transfer (to)/from joint venture receivables
Acquisition of development assets
Effect of movements in foreign exchange rates
Closing balance
Amortisation and Impairment Losses
Opening balance
Impairment of development assets
Amortisation charge for the year
Effect of movements in foreign exchange rates
Closing balance
Carrying Amounts
Opening balance
Closing balance
2016
$
2015
$
15,647,996
-
193,585
12,828,857
(347,029)
2,819,139
163,827
502,631
-
-
16,161,010
15,647,996
-
10,023,940
46,651
(48,585)
10,022,006
15,647,996
-
-
-
-
-
-
6,139,004
15,647,996
Development assets are reviewed at each reporting date to determine whether there is any indication of impairment or reversal of
impairment. Indicators of impairment include changes in: market conditions, future oil and gas prices and future costs. Where an
indicator of impairment exists, the assets recoverable amount is estimated. Development assets are assessed for impairment on a
cash generating unit (CGU) basis. The CGU’s are the Cambay Field and Bhandut Field, India.
Impairment is recognised when the carrying value exceeds the recoverable amount of the asset or CGU. The recoverability of the
Cambay Field development assets was estimated using a value in use model. Value in use is determined by estimating future cash
flows after taking into account the risks specific to the asset, then discounting it to its present value using an appropriate discount
rate. If the carrying value exceeds its recoverable amount, the asset is written down and the impairment loss recognised in the
income statement.
Significant judgements and assumptions are required by management in estimating the present value of future cash flows. This
is particularly so in the assessment of long life development assets. It should be noted that value in use calculations are subject to
variability in key assumptions including, but not limited to, long-term oil and gas prices, currency exchange rates, discount rates,
production profiles and operating costs. An adverse change in one or more of the assumptions used to estimate value in use could
result in a reduction in the development asset’s recoverable amount.
Bhandut Development Assets
The Bhandut gas production facilities were completed and $193,585 was transferred to development assets during the year ended 30
June 2016. The production from the Bhandut-3 well has not met expectations, due to increased water production from the well and
as at 30 June 2016 these facilities were fully impaired.
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.63
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
NOTE 13 – DEVELOPMENT ASSETS (continued)
Cambay Development Assets
The Cambay Field development assets were impaired by
$9,830,355 during the year ended 30 June 2016.
December Impairment
The recoverability of the Cambay Field development assets as at
31 December 2015 was estimated using a value in use model.
The key assumptions used for the determination of the value in
use assessment were based upon the 1P reserves, an inflation
rate of 2.2% and a pre-tax nominal discount rate of 17.1%. Oil
prices, derived from independent forward price curves (US$/bbl)
used were $40 to June 2016, $45 to December 2016, increasing
by $10 each calendar year until December 2018, then increasing
to $70 from January 2019 and to $80 from January 2021.
Natural gas prices are based upon existing contracts and long
term forecasts.
The decline in forecasted oil and gas prices resulted in a
non-cash impairment loss of $3,466,892 for the Cambay Field
development assets as at 31 December 2015.
June Impairment
The recoverability of the Cambay Field development assets as at
30 June 2016 was estimated using a value in use model.
The key assumptions used for the determination of the value
in use assessment were based upon projected gas and
condensate production assuming an extension to the PSC.
Projected production remains below 1C resources.
Natural gas prices are based upon the Company’s review of
analyst forecast Asian DES LNG spot prices, which were adjusted
for local Indian LNG processing charges and Indian taxes. Prices
average at approximately US$5 per mmbtu through to 2024
before rising steadily to US$13 per mmbtu by 2029.
Oil prices, derived from independent forward price curves (US$/bbl)
used were $53 in 2017, steady at approximately $62 through to the
end of December 2020, with a long term price of $71.
The PSC primary term which expires in September 2019,
provides for two five year extensions, such that the PSC could
be extended to 2029, subject to a field development plan being
submitted. The Government of India has recently issued a policy
proposal to extend the term of the PSC to the economic life of
the field.
The assumption for US inflation rate was 2.2% and for AUD/USD
was $0.74. The pre-tax nominal discount rate adopted was 18.1%.
The Company has certain specific risks in implementing its
planned development of Cambay which are not fully considered
by the pre-tax discount rate. Accordingly, the Company has risked
the value in use calculation for these specific risks including the
well success, PSC extensions and well completion technologies
by applying an estimated risk factor as at 30 June 2016.
The June 2016 value in use model resulted in a net lower value
in use. This reflected higher gas production, lower drilling costs
and the adoption of long term LNG price forecasts, which were
offset by the application of a specific risk factor to the model,
resulting in a non-cash impairment loss of $6,363,463 for the
Cambay Field development asset as at 30 June 2016.
For personal use onlyP.64
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
NOTE 14 – PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Cost
Balance at 1 July 2014
Acquisitions
Disposals
Currency translation differences
Balance at 30 June 2015
Balance at 1 July 2015
Acquisitions
Disposals
Currency translation differences
Balance at 30 June 2016
Depreciation and Impairment Losses
Balance at 1 July 2014
Depreciation charge for the year
Disposals
Currency translation differences
Balance at 30 June 2015
Balance at 1 July 2015
Depreciation charge for the year
Disposals
Currency translation differences
Balance at 30 June 2016
Carrying amounts
At 1 July 2014
At 30 June 2015
At 1 July 2015
At 30 June 2016
Motor
Vehicles
$
Plant and
Equipment
$
Office
Furniture
$
11,773
1,799,929
-
-
2,683
14,456
94,911
(771,984)
69,621
1,192,477
149,431
12,732
(32,146)
13,694
143,711
Total
$
1,961,133
107,643
(804,130)
85,998
1,350,644
14,456
1,192,477
143,711
1,350,644
-
(5,217)
495
9,734
39,432
(37,155)
15,704
6,211
(3,875)
2,532
45,643
(46,247)
18,731
1,210,458
148,579
1,368,771
10,761
1,610,473
295
-
2,481
13,537
62,924
(762,861)
50,471
961,007
85,158
7,089
(6,482)
10,184
95,949
1,706,392
70,308
(769,343)
63,136
1,070,493
13,537
961,007
95,949
1,070,493
252
(5,217)
459
9,031
1,012
919
919
703
60,757
(37,155)
9,148
6,818
(2,068)
1,884
67,827
(44,440)
11,491
993,757
102,583
1,105,371
189,456
231,470
231,470
216,701
64,273
47,762
47,762
45,996
254,741
280,151
280,151
263,400
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.65
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
NOTE 15 – TRADE AND OTHER PAYABLES
Trade creditors
Accruals
2016
$
2015
$
1,887,716
1,027,053
2,914,769
2,034,964
1,638,051
3,673,015
The Company’s assessment of the recoverability of outstanding cash call amounts owing from its Joint Venture partner (GSPC) has
resulted in an additional impairment (refer note 10) and consequently the Company is of the opinion that the Joint Venture will be
unable to meet its third party liabilities, without financial support from the Company as Operator, due to non-payment of outstanding
cash calls by the Joint Venture partner. As a result, the Group has accrued $467,924 as at 30 June 2016 (December 2015: $1,723,200,
June 2015: Nil) to cover Cambay, Bhandut and Sabarmati Joint Venture third party liabilities.
NOTE 16 – EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
Employee entitlements
NOTE 17 – PROVISIONS
Site restoration and well abandonment
Balance at 1 July
Provision adjustments during the year
Effect of movements in exchange rates
Balance at 30 June
Current
Non-current
2016
$
2015
$
356,510
406,843
2016
$
2015
$
3,595,742
3,061,107
(196,334)
126,771
(149,606)
684,241
3,526,179
3,595,742
181,794
3,344,385
3,526,179
-
3,595,742
3,595,742
For personal use onlyP.66
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
NOTE 18 – ISSUED CAPITAL AND RESERVES
(a) Issued Capital
A reconciliation of the movement in capital and reserves for the consolidated entity can be found in the consolidated statement of
changes in equity.
Shares
2016
Number
of Shares
2016
$
Issued Capital
2015
Number
of Shares
2015
$
Issued Capital
On issue 1 July - fully paid
677,906,039
153,928,046
591,034,789
148,980,743
Shares contracted to be issued - not fully paid
-
-
2,350,000
269,329
Balance at the start of the period
677,906,039
153,928,046
593,384,789
149,250,072
Issue of share capital
Shares issued for cash
Shares issued for cash (1)
Shares issued for cash (2)
Shares issued for cash (3)
Exercise of listed options (4)
Capital raising costs
Underwriter and sub-underwriter options
-
-
77,225,610
4,362,379
45,393,463
169,476,565
1,861,132
6,948,539
287,303,319
11,779,436
-
-
-
-
-
-
347,613
52,142
7,295,640
1,094,346
(3,055,535)
-
(631,219)
(147,532)
Balance at the end of the period - fully paid
1,180,426,999
171,513,760
677,906,039
153,928,046
Listed options exercisable at $0.15 per share expired 7 September 2015
On issue at 1 July
Exercise of listed options (4)
Expiry of listed options as at 7 September 2015
Total listed options
Number of Listed Options
2016
2015
188,596,471
195,892,111
(347,613)
(7,295,640)
(188,248,858)
-
-
188,596,471
Refer note 19 for details of unlisted options.
Additional information of the issue of ordinary shares and
listed options:
On 7 July 2015 the Company announced a two tranche
placement and underwritten rights issue placement to raise $30
million.
(1) On 15 July 2015, the Company issued 45,393,463 new
ordinary shares under Tranche One of the Placement at an
issue price of $0.041 per share.
(2) On 5 August 2015, the Company issued 169,476,565 new
ordinary shares under the fully underwritten Rights Issue at
an issue price of $0.041 per share.
The Company does not have authorised capital or par value in
respect of its issued shares. All issued shares at 30 June 2016
are fully paid.
The holders of ordinary shares are entitled to receive dividends
as declared from time to time and are entitled to one vote per
share at meetings of the Company.
(b) Option Reserve
The option reserve recognises the fair value of options issued
but not exercised. Upon the exercise, lapsing or expiry of
options, the balance of the option reserve relating to those
options is transferred to accumulated losses.
(c) Foreign Currency Translation Reserve
(3) On 18 August 2015, the Company issued 287,303,319 new
ordinary shares under Tranche Two of the Placement at an
issue price of $0.041 per share.
The foreign currency translation reserve comprises all foreign
currency differences arising from the translation of the financial
statements of foreign operations.
(4) 347,613 listed options with an exercise price of $0.15 were
exercised prior to expiry date of 7 September 2015.
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.67
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
NOTE 19 – SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS
At 30 June 2016 the terms and conditions of unlisted options granted by the Company to directors, employees, financiers and
advisors are as follows, whereby all options are settled by physical delivery of shares:
Grant Date
Number of Instruments
Vesting Conditions
Contractual Life of Options
Key Management Personnel
27 June 2013
5 August 2014
5 August 2014
16 February 2015
16 February 2015
Other Employees
28 October 2013
11 November 2013
11 November 2013
5 August 2014
5 August 2014
25 August 2014 (1)
25 August 2014 (1)
Financiers and Advisors
5 December 2013
22 December 2014
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
500,000
2,000,000
2,000,000
2,000,000
375,000
375,000
1,500,000
1,500,000
3,000,000
5,000,000
One year of service
Vest immediately
One year of service
Vest immediately
One year of service
Vest immediately
Vest immediately
Vest immediately
Vest immediately
One year of service
Vest immediately
One year of service
Vest immediately
Vest immediately
4 years
3 years
4 years
3 years
4 years
3 years
3 years
4 years
3 years
4 years
3 years
4 years
3 years
3 years
Total Options
20,250,000
(1) Subsequent to year end 3,000,000 unlisted options expired on 24 August 2016.
For personal use onlyP.68
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
The number and weighted average exercise prices of unlisted share options are as follows:
Outstanding at 1 July
Forfeited during the year
Lapsed during the year
Exercised during the year
Granted during the year
Outstanding at 30 June
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
2016
$0.19
$0.17
$0.21
-
-
Number of
Options
2016
33,975,000
(5,150,000)
(8,575,000)
-
-
$0.19
20,250,000
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
2015
$0.24
$0.22
$0.35
-
$0.21
$0.19
Number of
Options
2015
37,462,500
(2,250,000)
(12,887,500)
-
11,650,000
33,975,000
Exercisable at 30 June
$0.19
20,250,000
$0.18
30,900,000
The unlisted options outstanding at 30 June 2016 have an exercise price in the range of $0.10 to $0.35 (2015: $0.10 to $0.63) and a
weighted average remaining contractual life of 1.2 years (2015: 2.0 years).
No unlisted options were exercised during the years ended 30 June 2016 and 30 June 2015.
The fair value of unlisted options is calculated at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Model. Expected volatility is estimated by
considering historical volatility of the Company’s share price over the period commensurate with the expected term.
No unlisted options were issued in 2016.
The following share-based payments expense in relation to unlisted options have been recognised in the Consolidated Statement of
Profit or Loss and Other Comprehensive Income:
Share options - equity settled
Directors and employees
Financiers and advisors
Total share-based payments expense
2016
$
2015
$
149,523
552,139
-
-
149,523
552,139
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.69
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
NOTE 20 – RECONCILIATION OF CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss for the period
Amortisation of development assets
Depreciation
Provision for doubtful debts
(Profit)/loss on disposal of assets and materials
Impairment of exploration and evaluation assets
Impairment of development assets
Well abandonment reversal
Equity-settled share-based payments
Unrealised foreign exchange (loss)/gain
2016
$
2015
$
(36,154,111)
(17,388,524)
46,652
67,827
3,941,988
(1,281)
-
70,308
743,383
34,187
11,572,740
11,870,051
10,023,940
(196,334)
149,523
215,205
-
-
552,139
(681,668)
Operating Loss Before Changes in Working Capital and Provisions
(10,333,851)
(4,800,124)
Movement in trade and other payables
Movement in prepayments
Movement in trade and other receivables
Movement in provisions
Movement in inventory
Movement in employee benefits
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities
NOTE 21 – CONSOLIDATED ENTITIES
Parent Entity
Oilex Ltd
Subsidiaries
Independence Oil and Gas Limited
Admiral Oil and Gas Holdings Pty Ltd
Admiral Oil and Gas (106) Pty Ltd
Admiral Oil and Gas (107) Pty Ltd
Admiral Oil Pty Ltd
Oilex N.L. Holdings (India) Limited
Oilex Oman Limited (1)
Oilex (JPDA 06-103) Ltd
Oilex (West Kampar) Limited
2,481,955
1,128,375
516,145
138,068
(2,579,972)
(1,618,022)
30,053
10,930
(80,385)
(157,115)
(201,852)
28,153
(9,955,125)
(5,482,517)
Country of
Incorporation
Ownership Interest %
2016
2015
Australia
Australia
Australia
Australia
Australia
Australia
Cyprus
Cyprus
Australia
Cyprus
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
100
(1) Oilex Oman Limited, a dormant company registered in Cyprus, was placed under voluntary liquidation and a liquidator appointed
on 19 June 2014. This entity has sufficient assets to fund the ongoing liquidation process.
For personal use onlyP.70
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
NOTE 22 – FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
(a) Financial Risk Management
The Group has exposure to the following risks arising from financial instruments.
i) Credit Risk
ii) Liquidity Risk
iii) Market Risk
This note presents qualitative and quantitative information in relation to the Group’s exposure to each of the above risks and the
management of capital.
The Board of Directors has overall responsibility for the establishment and oversight of the risk management framework and the
development and monitoring of risk management policies. Risk management policies are established to identify and analyse the
risks faced by the Group, to set appropriate risk limits and controls, and to monitor risks and adherence to limits. Risk management
policies and systems are reviewed regularly to reflect changes in market conditions and the Group’s activities.
(b) Credit Risk
Credit risk is the risk of financial loss to the Group if a customer or counterparty to a financial instrument fails to meet its contractual
obligations, and arises principally from the Group’s receivables from customers and joint ventures.
Trade and Other Receivables
The Group’s exposure to credit risk is influenced mainly by the individual characteristics of each customer. The demographics of the
Group’s customer base, including the default risk of the industry and country in which customers operate, has less of an influence on
credit risk.
The maximum exposure to credit risk is represented by the carrying amount of each financial asset. The maximum exposure to credit
risk at the reporting date was:
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables - current
Trade and other receivables - non-current
2016
$
2015
$
5,158,361
2,235,737
102,343
1,187,158
3,575,545
98,958
7,496,441
4,861,661
The Group’s cash and cash equivalents are held with major banks and financial institutions.
The Group’s gross share of outstanding cash calls and recharges owing from joint venture partners and joint operations is $6,169,854
(2015: $3,242,242). The Group’s most significant customer is Enertech Fuel Solutions Pvt Limited with gas sales representing 77% of
the Group’s total revenues (2015: 2%) accounts for $12,090 of trade receivables (2015: Nil), whilst the Indian Oil Corporation Limited,
in its capacity as nominee of the Government of India, accounts for $150,710 of trade receivables as at June 2016 (2015: $144,644).
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.71
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
NOTE 22 – FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)
(b) Credit Risk (continued)
Impairment Losses
The aging of the trade and other receivables at the reporting date was:
Consolidated Gross
Not past due
Past due 0-30 days
Past due 31-120 days
Past due 121 days to one year
More than one year
Provision for doubtful debts
Trade and other receivables net of provision
Trade and other receivables net of provision
Current
Non-current
2016
$
2015
$
2,559,521
1,205,681
196,160
308,645
1,928,749
2,011,699
7,004,774
645,047
657,710
817,468
1,131,516
4,457,422
(4,666,694)
(782,919)
2,338,080
3,674,503
2,235,737
3,575,545
102,343
98,958
2,338,080
3,674,503
Receivable balances are monitored on an ongoing basis. The Group may at times have a high credit risk exposure to its joint venture
parties arising from outstanding cash calls.
The Group considers that there is evidence of impairment if any of the following indicators are present, financial difficulties of the
debtor, probability that the debtor will dispute amounts owing and default or delinquency in payment (more than one year old). The
Group has been in discussions with its joint venture partner for repayment of disputed and other amounts owing. As at 30 June 2016,
each receivable has been assessed individually for recovery and those deemed to have a low chance of recovery, have been fully
provided for in the current year. The Group is continuing discussions in order to resolve the outstanding issues and recover payment
of the outstanding amounts, however due to the age of the receivables amounts, cannot be certain of the timing or of full recovery.
(c) Liquidity Risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Group will not be able to meet its financial obligations as they fall due. The Group’s approach to
managing liquidity is to ensure, as far as possible, that it will always have sufficient liquidity to meet its liabilities when due without
incurring unacceptable losses or risking damage to the Group’s reputation.
The Group manages liquidity by monitoring present cash flows and ensuring that adequate cash reserves, financing facilities and
equity raisings are undertaken to ensure that the Group can meet its obligations.
The following table analyses the Group’s financial liabilities by relevant maturity groupings based on the remaining period at the
balance date to the contractual maturity date. The amounts disclosed in the table are the contractual undiscounted cash flows.
For personal use onlyP.72
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
Carrying Amount
$
Total
$
2 months or less
$
2 – 12 months
$
Greater than
1 year
$
Contractual Cash Flows
2,914,769
2,914,769
2,914,769
2,914,769
2,914,769
2,914,769
3,673,015
3,673,015
3,673,015
3,673,015
3,673,015
3,673,015
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
2016
Trade and other payables
Total financial liabilities
2015
Trade and other payables
Total financial liabilities
(d) Market Risk
Market risk is the risk that changes in market prices, such as foreign exchange rates, interest rates and equity prices will affect the
Group’s income or the value of its holdings of financial instruments. The objective of market risk management is to manage and
control market risk exposures within acceptable parameters, while optimising the return.
i) Currency risk
An entity is exposed to currency risk on sales and purchases that are denominated in a currency other than the functional currency of
the entity. The currencies giving rise to this risk are the United States dollar, Indian rupee and British pound.
The amounts in the table below represent the Australian dollar equivalent of balances in the Oilex Group Entities that are held in a
currency other than the functional currency in which they are measured in that Group Entity. The exposure to currency risk at balance
date was as follows:
In equivalents of
Australian dollar
Cash and cash
equivalents
Trade and other
receivables
Current
Non-current
Prepayments
Trade and other
payables
Net balance
sheet exposure
USD
$
2016
INR
$
GBP
$
USD
$
2015
INR
$
GBP
$
3,998,289
304,818
156,625
277,769
195,677
27,586
37,710
102,343
-
3,869,825
-
-
-
-
-
41,878
98,958
376,545
1,436,845
-
-
-
-
-
(470,438)
(505,992)
(33,041)
(629,062)
(1,138,810)
(84,793)
3,667,904
3,668,651
123,584
166,088
493,712
(57,207)
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.73
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
NOTE 22 – FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS (continued)
(d) Market Risk (continued)
i) Currency risk (continued)
The following significant exchange rates applied during the year:
AUD 1
USD
INR
GBP
Average Rate
Reporting Date Spot Rate
2016
0.7283
48.297
0.4914
2015
0.8382
51.917
0.5307
2016
0.7426
50.162
0.5549
2015
0.7680
48.979
0.4885
Foreign Currency Sensitivity
A 10% strengthening/weakening of the Australian dollar against the following currencies at 30 June would have (increased)/
decreased the loss by the amounts shown below. This analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular interest rates, remain
constant. The analysis is performed on the same basis for 2015.
10% Strengthening
United States dollars (USD)
Indian rupees (INR)
British pounds (GBP)
10% Weakening
United States dollars (USD)
Indian rupees (INR)
British pounds (GBP)
ii) Interest rate risk
At the reporting date the interest rate profile of the Group’s interest-bearing financial instruments was:
2016
$
410,567
407,628
13,732
(335,919)
(333,514)
(11,235)
2015
$
18,454
54,857
(6,356)
(15,099)
(44,883)
5,201
Carrying Amount
2016
$
2015
$
Fixed Rate Instruments
Financial assets (short-term deposits included in trade receivables)
148,585
188,959
Variable Rate Instruments
Financial assets (cash at bank)
5,158,361
1,187,158
Fair Value Sensitivity Analysis for Fixed Rate Instruments
The Group does not account for any fixed rate financial instruments at fair value through profit or loss so a change in interest rates at
the reporting date would not affect profit or loss or equity.
For personal use onlyP.74
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
Cash Flow Sensitivity Analysis for Variable Rate Instruments
An increase of 100 basis points in interest rates at the reporting date would have decreased the loss by the amounts shown below.
A decrease of 100 basis points in interest rates at the reporting date would have had the opposite impact by the same amount. This
analysis assumes that all other variables, in particular foreign currency rates, remain constant. The analysis is performed on the same
basis for 2015.
Impact on profit or loss
iii) Other market price risks
2016
$
2015
$
51,584
11,872
The Group had no financial instruments with exposure to other price risks at June 2016 or June 2015.
Equity Price Sensitivity
The Group had no exposure to equity price sensitivity at June 2016 or June 2015.
(e) Capital Risk Management
The Board’s policy is to maintain a strong capital base so as to maintain investor, creditor and market confidence and to sustain future
development of the business. The capital structure of the Group consists of equity attributable to equity holders of the Company,
comprising issued capital, reserves and accumulated losses as disclosed in the consolidated statement of changes in equity.
(f) Fair Values of Financial Assets and Liabilities
The net fair values of financial assets and liabilities of the Group approximate their carrying values. The Group has no off-balance
sheet financial instruments and no amounts are offset.
NOTE 23 – AUDITORS’ REMUNERATION
Audit and review services
Auditors of the Company – KPMG
2016
$
2015
$
Audit and review of financial reports (KPMG Australia)
161,988
114,080
Audit of Joint Operations operated by Oilex Ltd
Operator proportion only (KPMG Australia)
Audit and review of financial reports (KPMG related practices)
Other Auditors
Audit and review of financial reports (India Statutory)
Other services
Auditors of the Company – KPMG
Taxation compliance services (KPMG Australia)
Corporate services (KPMG Australia)
Taxation compliance services (KPMG related practices)
Other Auditors
Taxation compliance services (India Statutory)
915
19,768
182,671
5,844
188,515
24,524
-
16,293
40,817
9,350
50,167
1,878
20,408
136,366
6,398
142,764
18,600
6,132
19,255
43,987
8,530
52,517
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.75
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
NOTE 24 – OPERATING LEASES
Leases as Lessee
Non-cancellable operating lease rentals are payable as follows:
Within one year
One year or later and no later than five years
2016
$
126,062
110,246
236,308
2015
$
161,280
229,647
390,927
The Group leases its head office premises at Ground Floor, 44a Kings Park Road, West Perth under an operating lease. The current
lease has a three year term, commencing 1 June 2015, with an option to renew for a further two years.
The Group leases office premises in Gandhinagar (India) under an operating lease. The current lease had a one year term, which
expired August 2016 and has an option to renew for a further term after that date or rent month by month.
2016
$
2015
$
Operating lease rentals expensed during the financial year
174,458
179,749
NOTE 25 – JOINT ARRANGEMENTS
The Group’s interests in joint arrangements as at 30 June 2016 are detailed below. Principal activities are oil and gas exploration,
evaluation, development and production.
(a) Joint Operations Interest
Permit
OFFSHORE
JPDA 06-103
ONSHORE
Cambay Field
Bhandut Field
Sabarmati Field
West Kampar Block
Timor Leste/Australia (JPDA)
India (Cambay Basin)
India (Cambay Basin)
India (Cambay Basin)
2016
%
10.0
45.0
40.0
40.0
2015
%
10.0
45.0
40.0
40.0
Indonesia (Central Sumatra)
67.5 (1)
67.5 (1)
(1) Oilex (West Kampar) Limited is entitled to have assigned an additional 22.5% to its holding of 45% through exercise of its rights
under a Power of Attorney granted by PT Sumatera Persada Energi (SPE), following the failure by SPE to repay funds due. The
assignment request has been provided to BPMigas (now SKKMigas), the Indonesian Government regulator, and has not been
approved or rejected. If Oilex is paid the funds due it will not be entitled to also pursue this assignment.
For personal use onlyP.76
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
(b) Joint Operations
The aggregate of the Group’s interests in all joint operations is as follows:
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables
Inventory
Prepayments
Total current assets
Non-current assets
Exploration and evaluation
Development assets
Property, plant and equipment
Total non-current assets
Total assets
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables
Total liabilities
Net assets
(c) Joint Operations Commitments
The aggregate of the Group’s commitments attributable to joint operations is as follows:
2016
$
2015
$
367,131
2,656,826
1,230,603
38,705
335,777
3,127,048
1,235,448
166,450
4,293,265
4,864,723
535,812
7,587,300
6,139,004
14,835,248
178,063
190,139
6,852,879
22,612,687
11,146,144
27,477,410
(904,823)
(904,823)
(1,606,389)
(1,606,389)
10,241,321
25,871,021
2016
$
2015
$
Exploration expenditure commitments
-
-
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use only
P.77
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
NOTE 26 – EXPENDITURE COMMITMENTS
Exploration Expenditure Commitments
In order to maintain rights of tenure to exploration permits, the Group is required to perform exploration work to meet the minimum
expenditure requirements specified by various state and national governments. These obligations are subject to renegotiation when
application for an exploration permit is made and at other times. These obligations are not provided for in the financial report. The
expenditure commitments are currently estimated to be payable as follows:
Within one year
One year or later and no later than five years
2016
$
2015
$
-
-
-
-
-
-
Future commitments include the Canning Basin Exploration Permit Applications. The formal exploration permit period does not
commence until Oilex accepts an offer of a Petroleum Exploration Permit from the Government of Western Australia, Department of
Mines and Petroleum.
There are no minimum exploration work commitments in the Cambay and Bhandut Production Sharing Contracts.
When obligations expire, are re-negotiated or cease to be contractually or practically enforceable, they are no longer considered to be
a commitment.
Further expenditure commitments for subsequent permit periods are contingent upon future exploration results. These cannot be
estimated and are subject to renegotiation upon expiry of the existing exploration leases.
Capital Expenditure Commitments
The Group had no capital commitments as at 30 June 2016 (2015: Nil).
NOTE 27 – RELATED PARTIES
Identity of Related Parties
The Group has a related party relationship with its subsidiaries (refer note 21), joint operations (refer note 25) and with its key
management personnel.
Key Management Personnel
The following were key management personnel of the Group at any time during the financial year and unless otherwise indicated
were key management personnel for the entire period:
Non-Executive Directors
Position
Max Cozijn
Brad Lingo
Sundeep Bhandari
Jeffrey Auld
Executive Directors
Joe Salomon
Ron Miller
Executives
Mark Bolton
Peter Bekkers
Jayant Sethi
Chris Bath
Non-Executive Chairman
Non-Executive Director (appointed 11 February 2016)
Non-Executive Vice Chairman (until 25 November 2015)
Non-Executive Director (until 25 November 2015)
Position
Managing Director (appointed Non-Executive Director 29 November 2015 and
Managing Director 18 March 2016)
Managing Director (resigned 18 March 2016)
Position
Chief Financial Officer and Company Secretary (appointed 10 June 2016)
Chief Geoscientist
Head - India Assets
Chief Financial Officer and Company Secretary (resigned 24 May 2016)
For personal use onlyP.78
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
Key Management Personnel Compensation
Key management personnel compensation (with the 2015 comparative re-presented to reflect current year key management
personnel) comprised the following:
Short-term employee benefits
Other long-term benefits
Non-monetary benefits
Post-employment benefits
Termination benefits
Share-based payments
2016
$
2015
$
1,483,734
1,480,320
48,500
17,928
102,987
91,095
137,604
35,476
19,932
58,639
-
404,960
1,881,848
1,999,327
Individual Directors’ and Executives’ Compensation Disclosures
Information regarding individual Directors’ and Executives’ compensation is provided in the Remuneration Report section of the
Directors’ Report. Apart from the details disclosed in this note, or in the Remuneration Report, no Director has entered into a
material contract with the Company since the end of the previous financial year and there were no material contracts involving
Directors’ interests existing at year end.
Key Management Personnel Transactions with the Company or its Controlled Entities
A number of key management personnel, or their related parties, hold positions in other companies that result in them having control
or significant influence over these companies.
A number of these companies transacted with the Group during the year. The terms and conditions of these transactions were no
more favourable than those available, or which might reasonably be expected to be available, on similar transactions with non-key
management personnel related entities on an arm’s length basis.
The aggregate value of these transactions and outstanding balances related to key management personnel and entities over which
they have control or significant influence were as follows:
Transactions Value
Group’s Share
Balance Outstanding
Key Management
Personnel
Transaction
2016
$
2015
$
2016
$
2015
$
2016
$
Mr R L Miller (1)
Management services
364,659
451,521
364,659
451,521
Mr S Bhandari (2)
Consultancy services
34,327
161,059
34,327
77,845
2015
$
81,104
17,895
-
-
(1) Oilex used the services of La Jolla Enterprises Pty Ltd, of which Mr Miller is an employee. Rates charged were at market rates
and have been included in the remuneration of key management personnel disclosure. Included in the amounts paid to La Jolla
Enterprises is $69,000 approved by the Board on 18 March 2016 representing the total of Mr Millers accrued entitlements and
termination payments.
(2) Oilex used the services of India Hydrocarbons Limited (IHL) of which Mr Bhandari is a principal director and shareholder. The
gross monthly fee for services was US$7,500 (which remains unchanged since 1 July 2010). The agreement with IHL expired July
2016 and IHL continued to invoice the monthly fee while the contract was being renegotiated. Following the November AGM at
which Mr Bhandari did not stand for re-election, the Board renegotiated the outstanding fee to US$25,000, this amount being
fully allocated to the Group. Gross fees have been included in the remuneration of key management personnel disclosures.
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.79
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
NOTE 28 – CONTINGENT LIABILITIES AND ASSETS
Contingent Liabilities at Reporting Date
The Directors are of the opinion that provisions are not required in respect of these matters, as it is not probable that a future
sacrifice of economic benefits will be required or the amount is not capable of reliable measurement.
(a) Oilex Ltd has issued guarantees in relation to the lease of the current corporate office in West Perth, as well as corporate credit
cards. The bank guarantees amount to $148,585.
(b) In November 2006, Oilex (JPDA 06-103) Ltd (Operator) and the Joint Venture parties entered into a Production Sharing Contract
(PSC) with the Designated Authority for JPDA 06-103 and the PSC was signed in January 2007 (effective date 15 January 2007).
In January 2011 after the completion of the first two wells, the Autoridade Nacional do Petroleo e Minerais (ANPM) approved
the JPDA 06-103 Joint Venture’s proposal to vary the PSC work programme. Under the approved variation the decision to
drill the fourth commitment well on the JPDA 06-103 PSC would be at the discretion of the Joint Venture if the third well was
unsuccessful. The ANPM had also agreed that the PSC may be relinquished if the Operator and the Joint Venture parties decided
not to proceed with any further exploration after the third well. On 12 July 2013 the Operator, on behalf of the Joint Venture
participants, submitted to the ANPM, a request to terminate the PSC by mutual agreement in accordance with its terms and
without penalty or claim due to the ongoing uncertainty in relation to security of tenure. This request required the consent of the
Timor Sea Designated Authority.
On 15 May 2015 the ANPM issued a Notice of Intention to Terminate and on 15 July 2015 issued a Notice of Termination and
Demand for Payment (Notice). The demand for payment (100%) of the monetary claim of US$17,018,790 is the ANPM’s
estimate of the cost of exploration activities not undertaken in 2013, as well as certain local content obligations set out in the
PSC. In addition, the ANPM asserts that the Joint Venture Partners are liable to interest on the monetary claim at a rate of 5.2%
compounded monthly.
On 15 January 2016 the ANPM advised it was willing to accept US$13,585,790 as full and final settlement. The Joint Venture
rejected this offer on the basis that it considers a nil penalty should be imposed.
The parties continue to engage in discussions to reach an amicable resolution to this matter and the Joint Venture remains
hopeful a mutually acceptable outcome can be reached with the ANPM.
The company has not provided for a monetary settlement in its financial statements. As the Joint Venture has made significant
overpayments in the work programme, it considers the excess expenditure should be included as part of any financial
assessment incorporated in the termination process.
In the event the parties are unable to reach an amicable settlement, any party may refer the matter to arbitration. If this occurs,
the obligations and liabilities of the Joint Venture participants under the PSC are joint and several.
The equity interest of the Joint Venture participants are:
Oilex (JPDA 06-103) Ltd
Pan Pacific Petroleum (JPDA 06-103) Pty Ltd
Japan Energy E&P JPDA Pty Ltd
GSPC (JPDA) Limited
Videocon JPDA 06-103 Limited
Bharat PetroResources JPDA Ltd
Total
10%
15%
15%
20%
20%
20%
100%
For personal use only
P.80
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
Contingent Assets at Reporting Date
Contingent assets relate to an insurance claim receivable by the Company for which the amount is not capable of reliable
measurement and is not virtually certain and therefore the Company has not provided for this amount in this financial report.
2016
$
2015
$
Contingent assets not otherwise accounted for in this financial report
Insurance claim made or pending net of excess up to
900,000
-
NOTE 29 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
As announced to the market on 29 September 2016, subsequent to year end, the Board resolved to implement an additional
organisation restructure in order to further reduce costs.
The planned changes include:
»
»
»
»
»
an overall reduction in the number of personnel;
a reduction in salaries and wages for existing personnel;
review of commercial operations at Cambay and Bhandut Fields;
careful management of planned drilling and project costs; and
deferral of all non-essential expenditure.
Other than the above disclosure, there has not arisen in the interval between the end of the financial year and the date of this
report an item, transaction or event of a material and unusual nature likely, in the opinion of the Directors of the Company, to affect
significantly the operations of the Group, the results of those operations, or the state of affairs of the Group, in future financial years.
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use only
P.81
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30 JUNE 2016
NOTE 30 – PARENT ENTITY DISCLOSURE
As at, and throughout, the financial year ended 30 June 2016 the parent entity of the Group was Oilex Ltd.
Result of the parent entity
Loss for the year
Other comprehensive income
Total comprehensive (loss)/income for the year
Financial position of the parent entity at year end
Current assets
Total assets
Current liabilities
Total liabilities
Net assets
Total equity of the parent entity comprising of:
Issued capital
Option reserve
Foreign currency translation reserve
Accumulated losses
Total equity
Parent Entity Contingencies
2016
$
2015
$
(33,765,212)
(17,342,023)
(44,185)
(4,338,245)
(33,809,397)
(12,131,985)
7,856,401
4,321,870
12,514,242
21,999,513
2,694,250
4,591,369
3,006,980
5,129,244
7,922,873
16,870,269
171,513,760
153,928,046
930,742
2,342,059
(1,066,428)
(1,064,413)
(163,455,201)
(138,335,421)
7,922,873
16,870,269
The Directors are of the opinion that provisions are not required in respect to these matters, as it is not probable that a future
sacrifice of economic benefits will be required or the amount is not capable of reliable measurement.
(a) Oilex Ltd has issued guarantees in relation to the lease of corporate offices, as well as corporate credit cards. The bank
guarantees amount to $148,585. An equal amount is held in cash and cash equivalents as security by the banks.
(b) Oilex Ltd on 7 November 2006 issued a Deed of Parent Company Performance Guarantee in relation to the Production Sharing
Contract entered into with the Timor Sea Designated Authority dated 15 November 2006.
Parent entity capital commitments for acquisition of property plant and equipment
Oilex Ltd had no capital commitments as at 30 June 2016 (2015: Nil).
Parent entity guarantee (in respect of debts of its subsidiaries)
Other than the Performance Guarantee disclosed as parent entity contingencies above, Oilex Ltd has issued no guarantees in respect
of debts of its subsidiaries.
For personal use only
P.82
DIRECTORS’
DECLARATION
(1) In the opinion of the Directors of Oilex Ltd (the Company):
(a) the consolidated financial statements and notes set out on pages 41 to 81 and the Remuneration Report in the Directors’
Report, set out on pages 25 to 39, are in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including:
i) giving a true and fair view of the Group’s financial position as at 30 June 2016 and of its performance for the financial year
ended on that date; and
ii) complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001; and
(b) there are reasonable grounds to believe that the Company will be able to pay its debts as and when they become due
and payable.
(2) The Directors have been given the declarations required by Section 295A of the Corporations Act 2001 from the Managing
Director and Chief Financial Officer for the financial year ended 30 June 2016.
(3) The Directors draw attention to note 2(a) to the consolidated financial statements, which includes a statement of compliance
with International Financial Reporting Standards.
Signed in accordance with a resolution of the Directors.
Mr Max Cozijn
Chairman
West Perth
Western Australia
29 September 2016
Mr Jonathan Salomon
Managing Director
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use only
P.83
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
INDEPENDENT
AUDIT REPORT
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT TO THE MEMBERS OF OILEX LTD
Report on the financial report
We have audited the accompanying financial report of Oilex Ltd (the company), which comprises the consolidated statement of
financial position as at 30 June 2016, and consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income, consolidated
statement of changes in equity and consolidated statement of cash flows for the year ended on that date, notes 1 to 30 comprising a
summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information and the directors’ declaration of the Group comprising
the company and the entities it controlled at year’s end or from time to time during the financial year.
Directors’ responsibility for the financial report
The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation of the financial report that gives a true and fair view in accordance
with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Act 2001 and for such internal control as the directors determine is
necessary to enable the preparation of the financial report that is free from material misstatement whether due to fraud or error. In
note 2(a), the directors also state, in accordance with Australian Accounting Standard AASB 101 Presentation of Financial Statements,
that the financial statements of the Group comply with International Financial Reporting Standards.
Auditor’s responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the financial report based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance
with Australian Auditing Standards. These Auditing Standards require that we comply with relevant ethical requirements relating
to audit engagements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial report is free from
material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial report. The
procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgement, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the
financial report, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to
the entity’s preparation of the financial report that gives a true and fair view in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in
the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also
includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by the
directors, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial report.
We performed the procedures to assess whether in all material respects the financial report presents fairly, in accordance with the
Corporations Act 2001 and Australian Accounting Standards, a true and fair view which is consistent with our understanding of the
Group’s financial position and of its performance.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
Independence
In conducting our audit, we have complied with the independence requirements of the Corporations Act 2001.
KPMG, an Australian partnership and a member
firm of the KPMG network of independent member
firms affiliated with KPMG International Cooperative
(“KPMG International”), a Swiss entity.
Liability limited by a scheme approved under
Professional Standards Legislation.
For personal use onlyP.84
INDEPENDENT
AUDIT REPORT
Auditor’s opinion
In our opinion:
(a) the financial report of the Group is in accordance with the Corporations Act 2001, including:
(i) giving a true and fair view of the Group’s financial position as at 30 June 2016 and of its performance for the year ended on
that date; and
(ii) complying with Australian Accounting Standards and the Corporations Regulations 2001.
(b) the financial report also complies with International Financial Reporting Standards as disclosed in note 2(a).
Material uncertainty regarding continuation as a going concern
Without modifying our opinion expressed above, attention is drawn to note 2(g) in the financial report. The matters set forth in note
2(g) indicate the existence of a material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt on the Group’s ability to continue as a going
concern and therefore, the Group may be unable to realise its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business and
at the amounts stated in the financial report.
Report on the remuneration report
We have audited the Remuneration Report included in pages 25 to 39 of the directors’ report for the year ended 30 June 2016.
The directors of the company are responsible for the preparation and presentation of the remuneration report in accordance with
Section 300A of the Corporations Act 2001. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the remuneration report, based on our audit
conducted in accordance with auditing standards.
Auditor’s opinion
In our opinion, the remuneration report of Oilex Ltd for the year ended 30 June 2016, complies with Section 300A of the
Corporations Act 2001.
KPMG
Graham Hogg
Partner
Perth
29 September 2016
OILEX LTDANNUAL REPORT 2016For personal use onlyP.85
OILEX LTD ANNUAL REPORT 2016
SHAREHOLDER
INFORMATION
Shareholder information as at 27 September 2016
Additional information required by the ASX Limited Listing Rules and not disclosed elsewhere in this report is set out below.
The address of the principal registered office is Ground Floor, 44a Kings Park Road, West Perth, Western Australia 6005, Australia,
Telephone +61 8 9485 3200.
The name of the Company Secretary is Mr M Bolton.
Detailed schedules of exploration and production permits held are included in the Business Review.
Directors’ interest in share capital and listed options are disclosed in the Directors’ Report.
There is currently no on-market buy-back in place.
Shareholding
(a) Distribution of share and option holdings:
Size of holding
1 - 1,000
1,001 - 5,000
5,001 - 10,000
10,001 - 100,000
100,001 and over
Total
Number of
shareholders
Number of
unlisted option
holders
302
518
363
950
562
2,695
-
-
-
3
13
16
(b) Of the above total 1,889 ordinary shareholders hold less than a marketable parcel.
(c) Voting Rights:
The voting rights attached to the ordinary shares are governed by the Constitution.
On a show of hands every person present who is a Member or representative of a Member shall have one vote and on a poll, every
Member present in person or by proxy or by attorney or duly authorised representative shall have one vote for each share held. None
of the options give an entitlement to voting rights.
Register of Securities
The register of securities listed on the Australian Securities Exchange is held by Link Market Services Limited, Central Park,
Level 4, 152 St Georges Terrace, Perth, Western Australia 6000, Australia, Telephone +61 8 9211 6670.
The register of securities listed on the Alternative Investment Market of the London Stock Exchange is held by Computershare
Investor Services PLC, PO Box 82, The Pavilions, Bridgwater Road, Bristol BS13 8AE, United Kingdom, Telephone +44 870 702 003.
Stock Exchange Listing
Quotation has been granted for all the ordinary shares of the Company on all Member Exchanges of the Australian Securities
Exchange and the Alternative Investment Market of the London Stock Exchange (AIM) and trades under the symbol OEX.
Unquoted Securities – Options
Total unlisted options on issue are 17,250,000.
Mr Salomon (Managing Director) holds no options or shares as at 27 September 2016.
For personal use only
P.86
SHAREHOLDER
INFORMATION
Twenty Largest Shareholders
Shareholders
Curmi and Partners Ltd
Magna Energy Limited
Zeta Resources Limited
Barclayshare Nominees Limited
Chase Nominees Limited
TD Direct Investing Nominees (Europe) Limited
Continue reading text version or see original annual report in PDF format above