Quarterlytics / Industrials / Industrial - Machinery / Paccar

Paccar

pcar · NASDAQ Industrials
Claim this profile
Ticker pcar
Exchange NASDAQ
Sector Industrials
Industry Industrial - Machinery
Employees 10,000+
← All annual reports
FY2009 Annual Report · Paccar
Sign in to download
Loading PDF…
2 0 0 9   a n n u a l   r e p o r t

S T A T E M E N T   O F   C O M P A N Y   B U S I N E S S

S T O C K H O L D E R S ’

  I N F O R M A T I O N

PACCAR  is  a  global  technology  company  that  manufactures  Class  8  commercial 

vehicles  sold  around  the  world  under  the  Kenworth,  Peterbilt  and  DAF  nameplates. 

The  company  competes  in  the  North  American  Class  5-7  market  with  its  medium 

duty  models  assembled  in  North  America  and  sold  under  the  Peterbilt  and  Kenworth 

nameplates.  The  company  also  manufactures  Class  4-7  trucks  in  the  United 

Kingdom  for  sale  throughout  the  world  under  the  DAF  nameplate.  PACCAR 

distributes  aftermarket  truck  parts  to  its  dealers  through  a  worldwide  network  of 

Parts  Distribution  Centers.  Finance  and  leasing  subsidiaries  facilitate  the  sale  of 

PACCAR  products  in  many  countries  worldwide.  Significant  company  assets  are 

employed  in  financial  services  activities.  PACCAR  manufactures  and  markets 

industrial  winches  under  the  Braden,  Gearmatic  and  Carco  nameplates.  PACCAR 

maintains  exceptionally  high  standards  of  quality  for  all  of  its  products:  they  are 

well  engineered,  are  highly  customized  for  specific  applications  and  sell  in  the 

premium  segments  of  their  markets,  where  they  have  a  reputation  for  superior 

performance  and  pride  of  ownership.

CONTENTS

 

Financial Highlights

  Message to Shareholders

6 

PACCAR Operations

  Financial Charts

3  Stockholder Return Performance Graph

68  Management’s Report on Internal Control   

Over Financial Reporting

68  Report of Independent Registered Public   

Accounting Firm on the Company’s   

Consolidated Financial Statements

4  Management’s Discussion and Analysis

69  Report of Independent Registered Public   

39  Consolidated Statements of Income

40  Consolidated Balance Sheets

Accounting Firm on the Company’s   

Internal Controls

42  Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

70  Selected Financial Data

43  Consolidated Statements   

of Stockholders’ Equity

44  Consolidated Statements   

of Comprehensive Income

70  Common Stock Market Prices and Dividends

71  Quarterly Results

72  Market Risks and Derivative Instruments

73  Officers and Directors

44  Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

74  Divisions and Subsidiaries

Corporate Offices
PACCAR Building
777 106th Avenue N.E.
Bellevue, Washington
98004

Mailing Address
P.O. Box 1518
Bellevue, Washington
98009

Telephone
425.468.7400

Facsimile
425.468.8216

Web site
www.paccar.com

Stock Transfer 
and Dividend 
Dispersing Agent
Wells Fargo Bank   
Minnesota, N.A.
Shareowner Services
P.O. Box 64854
St. Paul, Minnesota 
55164-0854
800.468.9716
www.wellsfargo.com/
shareownerservices

PACCAR’s transfer agent 
maintains the company’s 
shareholder records, issues 
stock certificates and 
distributes dividends and 
IRS Form 1099. Requests 
concerning these matters 
should be directed to 
Wells Fargo.

Online Delivery of 
Annual Report and Proxy 
Statement
PACCAR’s 2009 Annual 
Report and the 2010 Proxy 
Statement are available   
on PACCAR’s Web site at 
www.paccar.com/ 
2010annualmeeting/ 

Stockholders who hold 
PACCAR stock in street   
name may inquire of their 
bank or broker about the 
availability of electronic 
delivery of annual   
meeting documents.

AeroCab, AERODYNE,   
Air Leaf, Braden, Carco, 
ComfortClass, Connect, 
DAF, Dynacraft, Gearmatic, 
Kenmex, Kenworth, 
Kenworth Clean Power, 
Leyland, Magnum, MAX-
card, PACCAR, PACCAR 
MX, PACCAR PX, PacLease, 
PacTrac, Peterbilt, PX-6,   
PX-8, The World's Best, 
TRP, UltraCab and Unibilt 
are trademarks owned by 
PACCAR Inc and its 
subsidiaries. 

Independent Auditors
Ernst & Young LLP
Seattle, Washington

SEC Form 10-K
PACCAR’s annual report 
to the Securities and 
Exchange Commission 
will be furnished to 
stockholders on request 
to the Corporate 
Secretary, PACCAR Inc, 
P.O. Box 1518, Bellevue, 
Washington 98009. It is   
also available online at   
www.paccar.com/investors/
investor_resources.asp, 
under SEC Filings.

Annual Stockholders’
Meeting
April 20, 2010, 10:30 a.m. 
Meydenbauer Center
11100 N.E. Sixth Street
Bellevue, Washington
98004

An Equal Opportunity 
Employer

This report was printed 
on recycled paper.

 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
I n d u s t r y   A w A r d s

PACCAR is a global technology company with a 104-year tradition of 

excellence.  The company has achieved a remarkable 71 consecutive 

years of net income and has paid a dividend every year since 1941.  

The company has a strong balance sheet and excellent S&P credit 

rating of AA-.  PACCAR has delivered an annualized return to 

shareholders of 19.1% for the last decade. 

J . d .   P o w e r   A w A r d s

Kenworth, Peterbilt and DAF are the 

established quality leaders in their 

markets.  In 2009, Kenworth and 

Peterbilt earned the majority of 

industry J.D. Power customer 

satisfaction awards.  PACCAR has 

earned 30 total J.D. Power awards.  

In addition, PACCAR was honored 

to receive the J.D. Power Founder’s 

Award for 25 years of corporate quality excellence in its major markets.

e n v I r o n m e n t A l 

l e A d e r s h I P

PACCAR is an environmental 

leader.  PACCAR offers a vast array 

of “green” powertrain options, 

including diesel-electric hybrid, LNG, 

CNG and other fuel-efficient vehicles.  

Many PACCAR facilities have 

achieved “Zero Waste to Landfill” 

and all PACCAR facilities have 

achieved ISO 14001 environmental certification.  Kenworth was the 

first commercial vehicle manufacturer to earn the prestigious Clean 

Air Excellence Award from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

t e c h n o l o g y   A w A r d s

PACCAR Information Technology 

Division (ITD) continues to be 

recognized for its technological 

leadership.  STAR (Standards for 

Technology in Automotive Retail) 

recognized PACCAR ITD with the 

2009 First Place Implementation 

Award.  Information Week 

recognized PACCAR ITD as a 

leading information technology innovator and the best automotive 

company in the industry. 

F i n a n c i a l   h i g h l i g h t s

Truck and Other Net Sales and Revenues 

$7,076.7 

$13,709.6

2009 

2008

(millions except per share data)

1

Financial Services Revenues 

Total Revenues 

Net Income 

Total Assets:

  Truck and Other 

Financial Services 

Truck and Other Long-Term Debt 

Financial Services Debt 

Stockholders’ Equity 

Per Common Share:

  Net Income:

  Basic 

  Diluted 

  Cash Dividends Declared 

1,009.8 

8,086.5 

111.9 

6,137.7 

8,431.3 

172.3 

5,900.5 

5,103.7 

1,262.9

14,972.5

1,017.9

6,219.4

10,030.4

19.3

7,465.5

4,846.7

$     0.31 

$ 
$

0.31 

0.54 

2.79

2.78

0.82

R E V E n U E s
R E V E N U E S
billions of dollars
billions of dollars

n E t   i n c o m E
N E T    I N C O M E  
billions  o f do l lar s 
billions of dollars

s t o c k h o l d E R s ’   E q U i t y
S T O C K H O L D E R S ’    E Q U I T Y  
billions of dollars 
billions of dollars

17.5

10%

1.5

40%

14.0

8%

1.2

32%

10.5

6%

0.9

24%

7.0

4%

0.6

16%

3.5

2%

0.3

8%

00

01

02  03

04

05

06

07   08

09

00

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

00

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

0.0

0%

0.0

0%

       Return on Revenues (percent)

       Return on Equity (percent)

5.5 

4.4

 3.3

2.2

1.1

0

PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
t o   o u r   s h a r e h o l d e r s

PaCCar had a reasonably successful year in 2009, even as the worst recession in 

2

decades  had  a  negative  impact  on  the  company’s  financial  results.    the  company  has 

earned an impressive 71 consecutive years of net income.  this remarkable achievement 

was  due  to  our  15,000  outstanding  employees  who  delivered  industry-leading  product 

quality,  innovation  and  outstanding  operating  efficiency.    PaCCar  benefited  from  its 

global  diversification,  superior  financial  strength  and  good  results  from  aftermarket 

parts and financial services.  PaCCar’s $327 million of capital investments and research 

and  development  in  2009  enhanced  its  manufacturing  capability  and  new  product 

introductions,  such  as  PaCCar’s  MX  engine  for  the  North  america  market.    PaCCar 

delivered  61,000  trucks  to  its  customers  and  sold  $1.9  billion  of  aftermarket  parts.  

PaCCar  maintained  its  excellent  s&P  credit  rating  of  aa-  as  a  result  of  consistent 

profitability,  a  strong  balance  sheet  and  good  cash  flow.    looking  ahead  to  2010, 

underlying economic indicators, impacted by high unemployment, low auto production 

and weak home construction, will result in a challenging year for our industry.  there may 

be some sales improvement due to aging of the truck fleet, modest economic growth and 

the positive impact of new engine emission regulations in the u.s. and Canada.

Net  income  of  $111.9  million  on  revenues  of  $8.1  billion  was  a  significant 

accomplishment in the very difficult economy.  PaCCar declared regular dividends of  

$.54 per share.  regular quarterly cash dividends have increased over 240% in the last 

10 years.  shareholder equity increased to a record $5.1 billion. 

Industry Class 8 truck sales in North America, including 

the recession caused the industry to abruptly decline in 

Mexico, declined to 119,000 vehicles compared to 

the fourth quarter of 2008.  Many of our competitors 

179,000 the prior year.  This is the lowest truck market 

are aggressively discounting their vehicles to survive in 

since 1991.  Over 1,700 fleets went out of business due 

the challenging market.

to lower freight volume and rates, reduced credit and 

  PACCAR’s financial performance in 2009 was 

the recession.  The European heavy truck market in 2009 

constrained due to lower sales and margins even though 

was 168,000 vehicles, compared to 330,000 in 2008, as 

the company proactively implemented comprehensive 

 
 
cost reductions.  After-tax return on beginning 

SIX  SIGMA — Six Sigma is integrated into all business 

shareholder equity (ROE) was 2.3% in 2009, compared 

activities at PACCAR and has been adopted at 190 of 

to 20.3% in 2008.  The company’s 2009 after-tax return 

the company’s suppliers and many of the company’s 

on revenues was 1.4%.  PACCAR’s long-term financial 

dealers and customers.  Its statistical methodology is 

3

performance, even in a turbulent, cyclical market, has 

critical in the development of new product designs, 

enabled the company to distribute over $3.6 billion  

customer services and manufacturing processes.  Since 

in dividends during the last 10 years and increase 

inception, Six Sigma has delivered over $1.4 billion in 

shareholder equity to $5.1 billion.  PACCAR’s average 

cumulative savings in all facets of the company.  Over 

annual total shareholder return was 19.1% over the last 

10,000 employees have been trained in Six Sigma and 

decade, versus a negative 1.0% for the Standard & Poor’s 

12,000 projects have been implemented since its 

500 Index.  The fragility of global financial institutions 

inception.  Six Sigma, in conjunction with Supplier 

provided a timely reminder of the merits and strength 

Quality, has been vital to improving logistics performance 

of PACCAR’s conservative business approach, quality 

and component quality from company suppliers.

products and customer service focus.

INFORMATION  TECHNOLOGY — PACCAR’s 

INVESTING  FOR  THE  FUTURE — PACCAR’s excellent 

Information Technology Division (ITD) and its 639 

long-term profits, strong balance sheet, and intense focus 

innovative employees are an important competitive   

on quality, technology and productivity enhancements 

asset for the company.  PACCAR’s use of information 

have allowed the company to invest $3.8 billion since  

technology is centered on developing and integrating 

2000 in capital projects, new products and processes.  

software and hardware that enhance the quality and 

Productivity and efficiency improvement of 5-7% 

efficiency of all products and operations throughout the 

annually and capacity improvements of over 100% in 

company.  In 2009, ITD provided innovative advancements 

the last five years have enhanced the capability of the 

in new engine manufacturing software and infrastructure 

company’s manufacturing and parts facilities.  PACCAR 

capacity upgrades.  Over 20,000 dealers, customers, 

is recognized as one of the leading applied technology 

suppliers and employees have experienced the company’s 

companies in the industry, and innovation continues to 

Technology Centers highlighting surface computing, 

be a cornerstone of its success.  PACCAR has integrated 

tablet PCs, an electronic leasing and finance office, and 

new technology to profitably support its business, as 

an electronic service analyst.

well as its dealers, customers and suppliers. 

TRUCKS — U.S. and Canadian Class 8 industry retail 

  Capital investments were $128 million in 2009.   

sales in 2009 were 108,000 units, and the Mexican market 

One exciting multi-year initiative was completion of 

totaled 11,000.  The European Union (EU) industry 

construction of PACCAR’s engine plant in Mississippi.  

heavy truck sales were 168,000 units.

The installation of the machining and assembly lines is 

  PACCAR’s Class 8 retail sales in the U.S. and Canada 

underway.  Other major capital projects during the year 

achieved a market share of 25.1% in 2009 compared to 

included investments to meet the exacting 2010 EPA 

26.0% the prior year.  DAF achieved a record 14.8% 

engine emission regulations, expansion of PACCAR 

share in the 15+ tonne truck market in Europe.  Industry 

Australia’s manufacturing and parts distribution capacity, 

Class 6 and 7 truck retail sales in the U.S. and Canada 

and installation of Technology Centers in our assembly 

were 40,000 units, a 36% decrease from the previous 

facilities.

year.  In the EU, the 6- to 15-tonne market was 51,000 

  PACCAR continues to examine business opportunities 

units, down 36% from 2008.  PACCAR’s North American 

in Asia, with its primary focus on China and India.  

and European market shares in the medium duty truck 

PACCAR is increasing its component purchases and 

segment were very good, as the company delivered 

powertrain sales in China as a result of its Shanghai and 

12,900 medium duty trucks and tractors in 2009.

Beijing offices.  The PACCAR MX engine has been 

  A tremendous team effort by the company’s 

honored as best-in-class at the Shanghai Bus Show three 

purchasing, materials, engineering and production 

years in a row.  

employees contributed to improved product quality and 

manufacturing efficiency during the recession.  The teams 

PACCAR’s dealers around the world.  In the industry, 

performed admirably and exceeded customer expectations 

there are over six million heavy duty trucks operating in 

by delivering the highest-quality products and services 

North America and Europe, and the average age of 

4

in our history.  The Peterbilt Nashville plant was 

North American vehicles is estimated to be over six years.  

permanently closed to align production capacity with 

The large vehicle parc creates the opportunity for 

market demand.

excellent demand for parts and service and moderates 

  PACCAR’s product quality continued to be recognized 

the cyclicality of truck sales.

as the industry leader in 2009.  Kenworth dominated 

  PACCAR Parts expanded current facilities to enhance 

customer satisfaction awards in the Class 8 markets. 

logistics performance to dealers and customers.  PACCAR 

Peterbilt earned the medium duty customer satisfaction 

Parts continues to lead the industry with technology that 

award and the DAF CF was the 2009 “Fleet Truck of the 

offers competitive advantages at PACCAR dealerships.  

Year” in the U.K. for the ninth time.

PACCAR Parts enhanced its Connect program, a software 

  Over 50% of PACCAR’s revenue was generated 

solution for customer fleet-maintenance management 

outside the United States, and the company realized 

and expanded national parts pricing and invoicing.

excellent synergies globally in product development, sales 

FINANCIAL  SERVICES — PACCAR Financial Services’ 

and finance activities, purchasing and manufacturing.

(PFS) conservative business approach, coupled with 

  DAF achieved good results in reducing dealer new 

PACCAR’s superb S&P credit rating of AA- and the 

truck inventory and was a leader in the development of 

strength of the dealer network, enabled PFS to earn 

the PACCAR MX engine for North America.

good results in 2009 despite turbulent worldwide 

  Leyland Trucks is the United Kingdom’s leading truck 

financial markets.  The PACCAR Financial Services group 

manufacturer.  Leyland grew its innovative body-

of companies has operations covering three continents 

building program by expanding its specifications to 

and 20 countries.  The global breadth of PFS and its 

include curtain-sided trailers and an additional range of 

rigorous credit application process supported a portfolio 

tailgate options.

of 143,000 trucks and trailers, with total assets of $8.4 

  PACCAR Mexico (KENMEX) had a challenging year 

billion that earned a pretax profit of $85 million.  

as the Mexican economy slowed and truck fleets were 

PACCAR Financial Corp. (PFC) is the preferred funding 

reduced.  Its manufacturing facility continues to deliver 

source in North America for Peterbilt and Kenworth 

improved efficiency and product quality.

trucks, financing 23% of dealer Class 8 sales in the U.S. 

  PACCAR Australia achieved good results in 2009, as 

and Canada in 2009.

the country avoided the worst of the global recession.  

  The unsettled financial markets and resulting “credit 

The introduction of new Kenworth models and expansion 

crunch” presented a daily challenge that increased 

of the DAF product range in Australia combined for a 

funding costs for our customers and prompted a 

20.9% heavy duty market share in 2009.

contraction in our finance companies’ assets.  Special 

  PACCAR International (PACCINT) exports trucks 

praise is merited for PACCAR’s treasury and finance 

and parts to over 100 countries and had a good year due 

teams who diligently, creatively and positively managed 

to sales buoyed by global natural resource exploration.  

the company through a very challenging market in 2009.  

PACCINT expanded its product range in South America 

PACCAR issued $1.3 billion in medium-term notes at 

by launching the full range of DAF vehicles for on-

attractive rates during the year.

highway customers.

  PACCAR Financial Europe (PFE) completed its eighth 

AFTERMARKET  CUSTOMER  SERVICES — PACCAR 

year of operation, focusing on the financing of new and 

Parts had a good year in 2009, even though dealers and 

used DAF trucks.  PFE provides wholesale and retail 

customers reduced inventory and delayed vehicle 

financing for DAF dealers and customers in 16 European 

maintenance.  With sales of $1.9 billion, PACCAR Parts 

countries and financed 16% of DAF’s vehicle sales in 2009.

is the primary source for aftermarket parts for PACCAR 

  PACCAR Leasing (PacLease) had a good year and 

products, and supplies parts for other truck brands to 

placed 3,800 new PACCAR vehicles in service in 2009.  

The North American lease market was lower, and PacLease 

2010 appears mixed as the economy generates limited 

Europe suffered due to the recession in the German truck 

growth in North America, and perhaps no growth in 

market.  The PacLease fleet is over 30,000 vehicles.  Twenty 

Europe.  There will continue to be challenges until 

percent of the North American Class 6-8 customers select 

major economic indicators significantly improve, which 

5

full-service leasing to satisfy their equipment needs.  

will prompt increased freight tonnage and renewed 

PacLease continued to increase its market presence in 

truck demand.  The company has taken proactive steps 

2009, growing its global network to over 400 locations, 

to adjust production rates as well as structurally reduce 

and represents one of the largest full-service truck rental 

costs throughout the organization.  PACCAR is well 

and leasing operations in North America.

positioned and committed to maintaining the profitable 

ENViroNmENtaL  LEaDErSHip — PACCAR is a global 

results its shareholders expect, by delivering industry-

environmental leader.  A significant accomplishment 

leading products and services globally.

during the year was earning ISO 14001 environmental 

  PACCAR and its employees are proud of the 

certification at all PACCAR manufacturing facilities in 

remarkable achievement of 71 consecutive years of net 

Europe and North America.  PACCAR introduced 

profit.  PACCAR plans for the long term, and our 

medium duty diesel-electric hybrid vehicles, which can 

shareholders have benefited from that approach.  The 

achieve up to a 30% fuel economy improvement.  Many 

embedded principles of integrity, quality and consistency 

of the company’s manufacturing facilities achieved “Zero 

of purpose continue to define the course in PACCAR’s 

Waste to Landfill” status during the year.  PACCAR 

operations.  The proven business strategy — deliver 

employees are environmentally conscious and utilize  

technologically advanced premium products and an 

van pools, car pools and bus passes for 30% of their 

extensive array of tailored aftermarket customer services 

business commuting.  

— enables PACCAR to pragmatically approach growth 

a  Look  aHEaD — PACCAR’s 15,000 employees enabled 

opportunities with a long-term focus.  PACCAR is 

the company to distinguish itself as a global leader in 

enhancing its stellar reputation as a leading technology 

the technology, capital goods, financial services and 

company in the capital goods and financial service 

aftermarket parts businesses.  Superior product quality, 

marketplace.

technological innovation and balanced global 

diversification are three key operating characteristics 

that define PACCAR’s business philosophy.

  The ongoing recession will continue to have a negative 

impact on the North American and European truck 

markets in 2010.  Current estimates for Class 8 trucks in 

m a r k   c .   p i g o t t

Chairman  and  Chief  Executive  Officer

North America indicate that yearly industry sales could 

Februar y  20,  2010

be similar to 2001, and range from 125,000-150,000 

units.  This is one of the lowest sales levels in the last   

10 years.  Sales for Class 6-7 trucks are expected to be 

between 35,000-45,000 vehicles.  The European heavy 

duty truck market, which had a weak year in 2009, could 

decline again as European government stimulus programs 

wane.  It is estimated that the 15+ tonne market for 

2010 will be in the range of 150,000-180,000 trucks, 

while demand for medium trucks should range from 

45,000-55,000 units.

  PACCAR had a reasonably successful year in 2009, 

with several operating divisions achieving good results, 

paccar Executive committee

Seated Left to Right: Tom Plimpton, Mark Pigott, Jim Cardillo, 

Dan Sobic; Standing Left to Right: Ron Armstrong, Michael 

Barkley, Aad Goudriaan, Bob Christensen, Dave Anderson,   

though some divisions recorded losses.  The outlook for 

Kyle Quinn

D A F   T R U C K S

DAF Trucks N.V. strengthened its position as one of Europe’s leading commercial vehicle 

manufacturers  in  2009,  increasing  its  market  share  in  the  over-15-tonne  segment  to  a 

7

record 14.8% and reinforcing its industry quality leadership.

In the highly competitive European truck market DAF garnered several awards in 2009 that reinforce its 

industry-leading reputation for product quality, innovation and customer satisfaction.  DAF’s flagship XF105 was 

voted “Best Truck Ever” by the leading British trade magazine Truck and Driver.  The CF85 was awarded “Fleet 

Truck of the Year” for the second consecutive year at the Motor Transport Awards in London — the ninth time 

that the DAF CF has won this accolade.

  DAF also earned “Best Engine Producer of the Year 2009” honors at Bus World Asia in Shanghai as a result   

of the reliability, durability and performance of the PACCAR 9.2- and 12.9-liter engines.  This is the third 

consecutive year PACCAR engines have received this honor.

  The light-duty LF series with its modern and spacious cab, low unladen weight and tight turning radius is the 

perfect choice for intra-city distribution applications.  Driver 

comfort is enhanced through the ease of cab entry and exit 

and the road-handling performance of a passenger car.  The 

2009 LF Series features a new interior that ensures a premium 

level of driver comfort while powertrain enhancements 

improve operating efficiencies.

  DAF Telematics — the state-of-the-art data communication 

system that enables operators to further optimize fuel management and business processes — became available 

in ten more European countries, allowing long-distance haulers to improve performance along their entire route.

  The “DAF Experience 2009” enabled thousands of visitors to tour DAF’s modern production facilities and 

new engine test center.  Visitors experienced the PACCAR Technology Center, which is an interactive showplace 

highlighting modern production technologies and DAF’s range of premium trucks and services, including 

PACCAR Financial and PACCAR Parts.

  The PACCAR Production System (PPS) integration enhanced DAF’s manufacturing efficiency and product 

quality.  The 50-PPM (Parts Per Million) Initiative introduced in all PACCAR manufacturing plants set a new 

standard for supplier operational excellence.  DAF was the first manufacturer to offer Enhanced Environmentally 

friendly Vehicles (EEV) in its entire product range.  In 2009, DAF became the first company that Lloyd’s Register 

verified and officially qualified as “Zero Waste to Landfill.”  The DAF engine design team was instrumental in the 

2010 launch of the PACCAR MX engine in North America.

DAF’s CF series has won “Fleet Truck of the Year” honors an unprecedented nine times.  The 

CF has proven its value in a myriad of applications, offering customers superior product 

quality, ergonomics, comfort and operating efficiency.

 
P e t e r b i l t   m o t o r s   c o m P a n y

Peterbilt earned the highest ranking in the J.D. Power and associates 2009 medium Duty 

truck customer satisfaction studysm in the conventional medium Duty truck segment* 

9

due to its superior product quality and outstanding customer support.  

Peterbilt celebrated its 70th anniversary in 2009, building on the heritage of “Class Pays” by introducing new 

products focused on low cost of ownership, increased performance and environmental responsibility.  

Peterbilt Models 386 and 384 were updated to include contemporary new interiors and industry-leading 

aerodynamics for more efficient operation and exceptional customer value.  The Model 384 joined the Model 

386 and 387 as EPA SmartWaySM certified vehicles, offering 10-20% fuel savings and 8% lower greenhouse   

gas emissions.  

Peterbilt’s conventional Models 389 and 388 were offered with a Fuel Efficiency Package that reduces vehicle 

drag by up to 24%, delivering a customer benefit of $5,600 in average annual fuel savings.

Peterbilt set a retail market share record by capturing 7.3%   

of the medium duty market in the U.S. and Canada.  Peterbilt 

introduced new medium duty Models 337 and 348 to serve an 

expanded range of customers in the Class 6-7 market.  The 

medium duty product range introduced a new interior and dash 

design that incorporates convenient, easy-to-read LED-backlit 

gauges; ergonomically designed operating controls; and a 

Peterbilt GPS Navigation System that incorporates a five-inch touch screen and an MP3 audio player. All 

Peterbilt medium duty vehicles are equipped exclusively with the fuel-efficient PACCAR PX engine.

Peterbilt expanded its range of alternative fuel vehicles in 2009.  The new Class 7 Model 337 diesel-electric 

hybrid tractor provides customers in the beverage, produce and short haul distribution markets with up to 30% 

improved fuel economy.  Peterbilt’s low-cab-forward Model 320 Hydraulic Hybrid, designed for vocational urban 

applications such as refuse collection, utilizes Hydraulic Launch Assist (HLA) technology to achieve up to 20% 

fuel savings and reduced annual maintenance costs.  Peterbilt launched new Models 384 and 365, which are 

powered by compressed or liquefied natural gas.  Peterbilt’s natural gas powered vehicles reduce emissions by 

12% and have established the standard for industry quality, durability, productivity and environmental 

responsibility. 

Peterbilt opened its state-of-the-art PACCAR Technology Center in its Denton, Texas, manufacturing facility 

this year. Over 5,000 visitors toured the Technology Center to view Peterbilt vehicles, customer services and 

innovative technologies.  The exhibit includes PACCAR Winch, PACCAR International, ITD, PacLease, PACCAR 

Parts, Dynacraft and PACCAR Financial.

  The Peterbilt dealer network expanded to a record 249 locations throughout the U.S. and Canada.  

The Model 386 successfully merges iconic Peterbilt styling with outstanding aerodynamic 

performance.  It has been recognized as fuel efficient and environmentally friendly by the EPA’s 

SmartWay program.  The introduction of the PACCAR MX engine in Peterbilt vehicles in summer 

2010 will enhance Peterbilt’s industry-leading performance.

*  Peterbilt received the highest numerical score among conventional medium duty trucks in the proprietary J.D. Power and Associates 2009 Medium Duty Truck Customer Satisfaction 
StudySM. Study based on 1,613 total responses measuring 9 manufacturers. Survey was of principal maintainers and owner operators and measures opinions of primary maintainers 
of two-year-old (by model year) medium duty (Class 5, 6 and 7) trucks. Proprietary study results are based on experiences and perceptions of consumers surveyed in June-July 
2009. www.jdpower.com 

 
 
 
 
 
 
k e n w o r t h   t r u c k   c o m p a n y

kenworth  achieved  the  highest  ranking  in  the  J.D.  power  and  associates  2009  heavy 

Duty truck customer Satisfaction StudySm among class 8 truck owners in the over the 

11

road and pickup and Delivery segments and in Dealer Service.*  

  Kenworth, “The World’s Best®,” has earned the J.D. Power customer satisfaction Over the Road award for   

five consecutive years and captured an industry-leading 16 customer satisfaction awards since 2003. 

  Kenworth Chillicothe celebrated its 35th anniversary in 2009.  One of the most technologically advanced 

truck plants in the industry, the Chillicothe facility has produced more than 330,000 Kenworth trucks since it 

opened in 1974.  Kenworth Chillicothe enhanced its robotic paint line in 2009.  

Kenworth Renton installed a modified production line to build off-highway vehicles 

to improve efficiency and quality.

  Kenworth became the first truck manufacturer to be honored with the prestigious 

Clean Air Excellence award presented by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA).  Kenworth was recognized for its diesel-electric hybrids that offer up to 30% 

better fuel economy; its T800 trucks powered by liquefied natural gas (LNG) that 

help reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 20%; and its Clean Power option that 

improves fleet fuel efficiency by 8%.

  Kenworth expanded its product range with the launch of two exceptionally 

versatile models in new market segments.  The T440, powered by the PACCAR PX-8 

engine, offers excellent productivity and fuel efficiency to regional delivery and 

vocational customers.  The T470 delivers Kenworth durability and performance to 

snowplow, winch and other municipal work truck applications.  In addition, 

Kenworth introduced new features to enhance driver comfort and productivity.  A 38-inch AeroCab® sleeper 

was added for the off-highway Kenworth C500, and an in-cab workstation, already popular in medium duty 

products, is now available for Class 8 models.

  Kenworth achieved record medium duty retail market share in 2009 of 8.0% due to the superior quality, ease 

of handling and reliability of the Class 6 KW T270 and Class 7 KW T370 models.

  Kenworth manufacturing facilities in Chillicothe, Ohio, and Renton, Washington, unveiled new PACCAR 

Technology Centers, which provide visitors with hands-on displays featuring Kenworth trucks, support services 

and technology.  These interactive exhibits present PACCAR engines, technology demonstrations and information 

on PACCAR Financial, PacLease, PACCAR Parts, PACCAR Winch and Dynacraft.

  Kenworth dealers increased the number of service locations to 302 in the U.S. and Canada.

The T660 AeroCab AERODYNE is Kenworth’s most aerodynamic model, unsurpassed for fuel-squeezing 

economy and long-haul luxury.  The introduction of the PACCAR MX engine in Kenworth vehicles in 

summer 2010 will enhance Kenworth’s industry-leading performance. 

*  Kenworth received the highest numerical score among pickup & delivery and over-the-road Class 8 trucks and heavy duty truck dealer service among heavy duty truck manufacturers 
in the proprietary J.D. Power and Associates 2009 Heavy Duty Truck Customer Satisfaction StudySM. Study based on 2,492 total responses measuring 4 (over-the-road), 5 (pickup 
& delivery) and 8 (dealer service) manufacturers and measures opinions of principal maintainers. Proprietary study results are based on experiences and perceptions of consumers 
surveyed in February-March 2009.  www.jdpower.com 

P A C C A R   A u s t R A l i A

PACCAR  Australia  dominated  the  heavy  duty  truck  market  in  2009  as  Kenworth 

12

remained  the  most  revered  nameplate  on  the  continent  —  a  reflection  of  the  brand’s 

unmatched reputation for custom-built quality and superior reliability.

  Kenworth is the leading producer of commercial vehicles in Australia.  Kenworth captured 46% of the high-

horsepower segment in 2009.  PACCAR Australia expanded its Class 8 product range with the introduction of 

the Kenworth T402.  The T402 delivers industry-leading productivity, comfort and fuel efficiency for distribution 

in single-trailer, vocational B-double and rigid applications.

PACCAR Australia reinforced PACCAR’s global environmental leadership by delivering the country’s first 

liquefied natural gas (LNG) cab over model.  The Kenworth LNG K108 hauls 150,000 pounds and reduces 

greenhouse emissions by over 20%.

PACCAR Australia extended its Bayswater manufacturing site by 69,500 square feet with the purchase of an 

adjoining property.  The acquisition provides additional office, parts warehouse and factory capacity.  The 

increased capacity enables PACCAR Australia to support the record number of Kenworth vehicles on the road in 

Australia and meet truck demand from the growing natural resource industry.

Kenworth vehicles define heavy duty trucking in Australia, delivering custom-built quality and superior reliability. 

PACCAR Australia’s T608 offers class-leading aerodynamics and enhanced fuel efficiency while hauling 100,000-pound 

road-train loads.

 
 
p a c c a r   m e x i c o

paccar  m exico  (KeN mex)  celebrated  50  years  of  leadership  in  the  mexican 

transportation  industry  in  2009,  capturing  36%  of  the  class  8  market  and  achieving  a 

13

record class 7 medium duty market share of 30%.

  KENMEX has manufactured over 169,000 vehicles since 1959 in its 590,000-square-foot production facility in 

Mexicali, Baja California.  In Mexico, 85% of all goods are transported by road, and for half a century Kenworth 

has earned its legendary reputation for product quality, reliability, innovation and customer support.

  This year, KENMEX expanded its product range by introducing the new Kenworth T460 designed specifically 

for Mexico’s vocational applications and became the first manufacturer to offer diesel-electric hybrid commercial 

vehicles in Mexico.  The Kenworth medium duty hybrid models T270 and T370 achieve fuel efficiency gains of 

up to 30% in metropolitan markets.

  KENMEX has 121 dealer locations that offer the most extensive parts and service network in the country.  

Kenworth earned every customer service excellence award for commercial vehicles presented by the National 

Association of Automotive Distributors (NAAD) in 2009.

The new Kenworth T460 has been developed with a robust powertrain and contemporary styling for the vocational 

markets in Mexico, Central and South America.

l e y l a n d   t r u c k s

leyland,  the  united  kingdom’s  leading  truck  manufacturer,  celebrated  its  eleventh 

14

anniversary as a Paccar company.   leyland delivered 8,100 vehicles to customers in 

europe, australia, africa and north america.

Leyland’s highly efficient 710,000-square-foot manufacturing facility incorporates an innovative robotic 

chassis paint facility, an in-house body design and a state-of-the-art production system that builds the entire 

DAF product range — LF, CF and XF — for right- and left-hand drive markets.

Leyland introduced the Euro 5 DAF truck range during 2009, incorporating lower emissions with improved 

fuel economy, enhanced braking systems and advanced software diagnostics.  The plant expanded its body building 

program to offer more customer-specific options, resulting in higher market share and improved profitability.

  Unveiled in 2009, Leyland’s Product and Technology Center showcases PACCAR products, technologies and 

services in an interactive environment designed to increase customer awareness of the company’s quality leadership.

Leyland was honored during the year by earning the Manufacturing Excellence (MX) Award presented by the 

Institute of Mechanical Engineers.  Leyland also earned the prestigious Queen’s Award for Enterprise: International 

Trade 2009.

Leyland enhanced delivery schedules for customers of DAF vehicles by offering factory-installed high-quality van bodies. Leyland 

expanded the innovative program to incorporate more specialized, application-specific options that will launch the vans into more 

market segments.

 
 
 
p a c c a r   i n t e r n a t i o n a l

paccar  international  distributes  DaF,  peterbilt  and  Kenworth  trucks  and  parts  to 

customers  in  over  100  countries.    paccar  vehicles  are  recognized  globally  for  their 

15

premium quality, world-class performance and outstanding customer support.

PACCINT sales in Latin America were strong due to demand for municipal, construction, dump and refuse 

trucks.  Higher commodity prices contributed to sales of the Kenworth 963 and K500 models used in oilfield 

exploration, mining and servicing sectors.  Both models feature new modern cabs on severe service chassis, 

which provide excellent driver comfort and superb mobility over rough terrain.

In Asia, PACCAR MX engines have established an excellent reputation among luxury coach producers — an 

important and substantial market.  PACCAR was awarded the “Best Engine Producer of the Year” at the Bus 

World Asia exhibition for the third consecutive year, in recognition of the PACCAR MX engine’s industry-

leading reliability, durability and fuel efficiency.  

PACCINT expanded its global distribution network in 2009 with 15 new service locations in Russia, the 

Middle East and Southeast Asia.

PACCAR International utilizes its extensive knowledge of overseas markets and PACCAR’s unrivaled engineering 

and manufacturing resources to deliver superior quality transportation solutions globally.  The award-winning 

DAF XF is popular in many markets worldwide.

 
 
 
P A C C A R   P A R t s

PACCAR  Parts  achieved  record  market  share  in  2009,  delivering  1.2  million  parts 

16

shipments worldwide to over 1,900 Kenworth, Peterbilt and DAF dealer locations.

PACCAR Parts successfully launched the TRP brand in North America.  TRP consolidates seven brands under   

a single aftermarket brand focused on servicing the needs of commercial vehicles. Customers are rewarded with 

high quality, cost-effective choices for everyday repair and maintenance parts.

  There are 300,000 registered PACCAR customers enjoying the advantages of monthly parts and service 

programs by using loyalty cards in North America, Europe and Australia.  The Peterbilt Preferred, Kenworth 

Privileges and DAF “MAX” loyalty cards celebrated their one millionth customer redemption in 2009.  Loyalty 

card retail sales tripled in 2009 versus 2008.

PACCAR Parts launched an enhanced fleet service program in 2009 that provides guaranteed national pricing, 

customized reporting and centralized billing for fleet customers through Kenworth PremierCare and Peterbilt 

TruckCare services.  

  The PACCAR Call Center (PCC) in North America celebrated ten years of roadside service — enabling 

professional drivers to return to operation quickly and reliably.  PCC offers 24/7 roadside support throughout 

North America and Europe, managing 1.6 million calls annually.

PACCAR Parts’ global operations employ state-of-the-art technologies — wireless voice recognition, integrated logistic systems and 

tablet PCs — and cutting-edge dealer inventory management tools to support aftermarket customers. 

 
 
P A c c A r   W i n c h

PAccAr Winch, the premier full-line producer of industrial winches globally, increased 

sales into new overseas markets and enhanced its innovative customer support. 

17

PACCAR Braden recovery winches, hoists and drives, Gearmatic planetary winches, and Carco tractor 

winches are recognized for superior engineering and dependable performance in rugged applications and harsh 

environments — from freezing North Sea oil platforms to the logging forests of Southeast Asia.

PACCAR Winch introduced the Magnum line, a robust and efficient winch for oilfield applications.  A new 

35,000 pound winch, the HP35, offers oilfield customers a 30% savings in preventative maintenance costs with 

an innovative design that allows improved access for periodic component reviews. 

PACCAR Winch also launched the new GH30 winch for demanding logging applications.  This proprietary 

30,000-pound winch delivers superior performance in both line pull and speed — improving log retrieval time 

by 50%. 

  The PACCAR Winch manufacturing facilities in Broken Arrow and Okmulgee, Oklahoma, achieved an 

impressive environmental goal of “Zero Waste to Landfill.”  The company saved 20% of total plant energy 

consumption by strategic environmental initiatives.  

PACCAR Winch Division’s Braden, Carco and Gearmatic nameplates — recognized for superior design and reliability even under the 

toughest operating conditions — pace the market in a broad range of key industries throughout the world.

 
 
 
p a c c a r   f i n a n c i a l   s e r v i c e s

paccar financial services (pfs) companies, which support the sale of paccar trucks 

18

worldwide, achieved good results in 2009, reporting pre-tax profits of $85 million.  The 

pfs portfolio is comprised of 143,000 trucks and trailers, with total assets of $8.4 billion.

PACCAR’s excellent balance sheet, complemented by its reaffirmed AA- credit rating, enabled PACCAR to 

issue $1.3 billion in two-, three- and five-year notes in the public debt markets during 2009.  Ongoing access   

to the capital markets at excellent rates enables PFS to profitably support the sale of PACCAR vehicles in 20 

countries on three continents.  PFS strengthened its market leadership in 2009, achieving retail market share of 

26%, while the global recession caused many lenders to exit the transportation finance business. 

PACCAR Financial Europe (PFE) has $2.4 billion in assets and is the leading financial services provider to 

DAF dealers and customers in 16 Western and Central European countries.  PFE and DAF developed innovative 

sales programs to reduce dealer new truck inventories by 50% and strengthen dealers’ balance sheets in 2009.

PFS utilized its dedicated used truck sales facilities in Europe and North America — including its recently 

opened used truck center in South Carolina — to remarket a record 12,000 pre-owned PACCAR trucks. 

PACCAR Financial offers an industry-leading spectrum of creative, flexible products, services and information 

technologies to facilitate the sale of premium-quality PACCAR vehicles throughout the world.

 
 
 
p a c c a r   L e a s i n g   c o m p a n y

paccar  Leasing  achieved  a  record  404  full-service  lease  locations  and  increased 

market  share  in  2009  —  delivering  more  than  3,800  new  Kenworth,  peterbilt  and  DaF 

19

trucks to its network.  The pacLease fleet totals over 30,000 vehicles.

PacLease offers only premium-quality PACCAR vehicles, which are valued for their reliability, superior fuel 

efficiency and residual values that are 15-25% higher than competitive models.  PacLease was the first full-service 

leasing company to offer diesel-electric hybrid vehicles to its customers.

PacLease Sales Suite 2.0 was launched in 2009.  This sophisticated electronic software streamlines the 

generation of customer purchase and leasing documents.  It is 10 times faster than the previous tool and enables 

real-time communication between the dealership, customer and PacLease sales team to enhance sales and support.

PacLease established itself as a leading truck rental and leasing company in Germany through an acquisition 

in 2007.  PacLease Europe has a fleet of over 3,600 units, and its expanding presence in the full-service lease 

segment helped DAF achieve a record share of the German truck market in 2009. 

One of the most innovative truck leasing networks in the industry, PacLease added a record number of outlets in 2009 and 

increased its share of the medium duty market. PacLease expanded its fleet of premium-quality Class 6-7 trucks with 

vehicles such as this popular Peterbilt Model 335.

 
 
 
p a c c a r   T E c H N I c a L   c E N T E r S

paccar’s  Technical  centers  utilize  world-class  testing  facilities  and  advanced 

20

simulation  technologies  to  accelerate  product  development  and  ensure  that  paccar 

continues to deliver the highest-quality products in the industry.

PACCAR’s world-class Technical Centers in Europe and North America are equipped with state-of-the-art 

product test and validation capabilities and staffed with technical experts in powertrain and vehicle development.  

Sophisticated computer simulations and advanced analysis of engine and vehicle control systems are used to 

optimize vehicle efficiency while meeting strict emission regulations.  Vehicle laboratories utilize sophisticated 

hydraulic digital technology, coupled with PACCAR proprietary road simulators to replicate truck durability 

testing equivalent to one million miles, in months rather than years.  

In 2009, the North American Technical Center completed validation of the PACCAR MX engine’s compliance 

with 2010 EPA emissions regulations.  The engine test cells complement chassis development by evaluating 

engine cooling, electrical systems and exhaust after-treatment.  This interactive approach reduces development 

time and ensures optimal performance of Kenworth, Peterbilt and DAF vehicles.

PACCAR’s Technical Centers in Europe and North America accelerate product development cycles through the application of highly 

advanced engineering analysis, simulation and rapid prototyping technologies.

 
 
I N F O R M A T I O N   T E C H N O L O G Y   D I V I S I O N

PACCAR’s Information Technology Division (ITD) is an industry leader in the innovative 

application  of  software  and  hardware  technologies.  ITD  enhances  the  quality  of  all 

21

PACCAR operations and electronically integrates dealers, suppliers and customers. 

For the sixth consecutive year, ITD was recognized by the prestigious Information Week magazine as a leading 

innovator of cost-effective information technologies. PACCAR was recognized for integrating order processing 

and dealer business systems to double the speed of electronic transactions for sales and production.

ITD’s 639 employees collaborate with PACCAR divisions to use technology to enhance manufacturing, financial 

services and engineering design. This year ITD partnered with the PACCAR Engine Company to design and 

implement the operating framework for the logistics and manufacturing automation utilized in PACCAR’s 

Columbus, Mississippi, engine facility. 

ITD, Kenworth and Peterbilt developed and introduced the Electronic Service Analyst (ESA 3.0) for vehicle 

performance evaluation and remote service analysis. New features include Bluetooth wireless communication, 

vehicle parametric programming and diagnostic monitoring.

One of the most innovative information technology organizations in the world, PACCAR ITD partners with leading-edge hardware and 

software companies to enhance PACCAR’s competitiveness, manufacturing efficiency, product quality, customer service and profitability.

 
 
 
f i n a n c i a l   c h a r t s
f i n a n c i a l   c h a r t s

22

W E S T E R N   A N D   C E N T R A L   E U R O P E  
WEstErn  and  cEntral  EUrOPE   
> 1 5 T   M A R K E T   S H A R E  
> 15t  markEt  sharE

U . S .   A N D   C A N A D A   C L A S S   8   T R U C K   M A R K E T   S H A R E  
U.s.  and  canada  class  8  trUck  markEt  sharE

registrations
registrations

15%

trucks (000)
          trucks (000)
350

retail sales 
retail sales

28%

trucks (000)
         trucks (000)
325

13%

11%

9%

7%

5%

280

26%

210

24%

140

22%

70

0

20%

18%

260

195

130

65

0

00

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09  

00

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

■  Total Western and Central Europe   
  >15T Units

■  Total U.S. and Canada Class 8 Units  

  PACCAR Market Share (percent)

  PACCAR Market Share (percent)

t O ta l   a s s E t s
T O TA L   A S S E T S
b il lions  o f do l lar s 
billions of dollars

GEOGraPhic  rEVEnUE
GEOGRAPHIC REVENUE
billions of dollars 
billions of dollars

17.5

14.0

10.5

7.0

3.5

0.0

00

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

09

00

01

02

03

04

05

06

07

08

■  Truck and Other

■  Financial Services

■  United States

■  Rest of World

17.5

14.0

10.5

7.0

3.5

0.0
09      

 
 
 
S T O C K H O L D E R   R E T U R N   P E R F O R M A N C E   G R A P H

The following line graph compares the yearly percentage change in the cumulative total stockholder return on the 
Company’s common stock, to the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poor’s Composite 500 Stock Index 
and the return of the industry peer group of companies identified in the graph (the Peer Group Index) for the last 
five fiscal years ending December 31, 2009. Standard & Poor’s has calculated a return for each company in the Peer 
Group Index weighted according to its respective capitalization at the beginning of each period with dividends 
reinvested on a monthly basis. Management believes that the identified companies and methodology used in the 
graph for the peer group indices provides a better comparison than other indices available. The Peer Group Index 
consists of Caterpillar Inc., Cummins Inc., Danaher Corporation, Deere & Company, Dover Corporation, Eaton 
Corporation, Harley-Davidson, Inc., Honeywell International Inc., Illinois Tool Works Inc., Ingersoll-Rand Company 
Ltd. and United Technologies Corporation. The comparison assumes that $100 was invested on December 31, 2004 
in the Company’s common stock and in the stated indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends.



PACCAR Inc
Peer Group Index

S&P 500 Index

200

150

100

200

150

100

50

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

50

2009

PACCAR Inc

S&P 500 Index

Peer Group Index

2004

 100

 100

 100

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

  89.58

  131.71

  170.96

  91.71

  118.42

  104.91

  121.48

  128.16

  80.74

  102.11

  103.87

  122.43

  156.99

  92.51

  127.43

PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries

 
 
 
 
M a n a g eM e n t ’ s   d i s c u s s i o n   a n d   a n a l y s i s   o f   f i n a n c i a l 
c o n d i t i o n   a n d   r e s u l t s   o f   o p e r a t i o n s

(tables in millions, except truck unit and per share data)



r e s u lt s   o f   o p e r at i o n s :

Net sales and revenues:
  Truck and Other  
Financial Services  

Income before taxes:
  Truck and Other 

Financial Services  
Investment income 

Income taxes 
Net Income 
Diluted Earnings Per Share 

2009 

2008 

2007

$ 7,076.7 
  1,009.8 
$ 8,086.5 

$ 13,709.6 
  1,262.9 
$ 14,972.5 

$ 14,030.4
  1,191.3
$ 15,221.7

$ 

68.1 
84.6 
22.3 
(63.1) 
$  111.9 
.31 
$ 

$  1,162.5 
216.9 
84.6 
  (446.1) 
$  1,017.9 
2.78 
$ 

$  1,384.8
284.1
95.4
  (537.0)
$  1,227.3
3.29
$ 

Overview:
PACCAR is a global technology company whose principal businesses include the design, manufacture and distribution 
of high-quality, light, medium and heavy duty commercial trucks and related aftermarket parts and the financing 
and leasing of its trucks and related equipment. The Company also manufactures and markets industrial winches.

2009 Compared to 2008: 
Consolidated net sales and revenues were $8.09 billion in 2009, compared to $14.97 billion in 2008, reflecting the 
recessionary conditions that dampened demand for the Company’s products throughout the world. 

PACCAR achieved net income for the 71st consecutive year in 2009 under very difficult business conditions. Net 
income was $111.9 million ($.31 per diluted share) in 2009 compared to $1.02 billion ($2.78 per diluted share) in 
2008. Net income included $41.5 million ($.11 per diluted share) of curtailment gains related to postretirement 
health care plans ($66.0 million, pretax) and $11.4 million ($.03 per diluted share) of income tax expense from the 
retroactive effects of a new income tax law in Mexico. 

Net sales and revenues in the Truck and Other businesses of $7.08 billion in 2009 were 48% lower than the $13.71 
billion in 2008. The decrease in sales and revenues for 2009 resulted from lower truck unit and parts sales in all 
markets due to lower overall market demand.

Cost of sales and revenues in the Truck and Other businesses were $6.48 billion in 2009 compared to $11.74 billion 
in 2008. Cost of sales and revenues declined primarily due to the decrease in worldwide truck deliveries. Cost of sales 
included employee severance costs of $19.2 million in 2009 compared to severance costs of $13.1 million in 2008. 

Research and development expenditures declined to $199.2 million in 2009 from $341.8 million in 2008 primarily 
due to lower spending on engine development and reduced spending for new vehicle development.

Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expense for Truck and Other declined to $348.4 million in 2009 
compared to $470.2 million in 2008. The lower spending was a result of focused efforts to reduce costs in response 
to the global economic recession and consisted primarily of reduced staffing, sales and marketing, and travel costs. 
Foreign currency translation effects reduced SG&A by $10.8 million. Severance costs included in SG&A were $6.4 
million in 2009 compared to $3.4 million in 2008. As a percentage of sales, SG&A increased to 4.9% in 2009 from 
3.4% in 2008 due to lower sales volumes.

Interest and other expense, net in 2009 of $43.6 million includes $22.2 million of expense for changes in fair values 
of economic hedges and $14.2 million of expense for foreign currency translation adjustments primarily in Mexico 
and Canada.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial Services revenues decreased to $1.01 billion in 2009 from $1.26 billion in 2008. The decreased revenues in 
2009 resulted from lower earning asset balances in all markets and lower yields in North America and Europe. 
Financial Services income before income taxes was $84.6 million in 2009 compared to $216.9 million in 2008. The 
decrease of $132.3 million was primarily due to lower finance margin from the reduced finance receivables and net 
operating lease income partially offset by a decline in SG&A expense. 



Investment income declined to $22.3 million in 2009 compared to $84.6 million in 2008 primarily due to lower 
market interest rates.

The 2009 effective income tax rate was 36.1% compared to 30.5% in 2008. The higher rate in 2009 was primarily 
due to the tax law change in Mexico. Excluding the retroactive effect of the Mexican tax law change the effective tax 
rate was 29.5%.

The Company’s return on revenues was 1.4% in 2009 and 6.8% in 2008.

2008 Compared to 2007:
Consolidated net sales and revenues were $14.97 billion in 2008 compared to $15.22 billion in 2007, reflecting 
strong but slowing demand for the Company’s high quality trucks in Europe. The U.S. and Canada truck markets 
were lower but there was continued solid aftermarket parts and financial services revenues.

PACCAR achieved net income of $1.02 billion ($2.78 per diluted share) in 2008 compared to $1.23 billion ($3.29 
per diluted share) in 2007, the fourth best result in the Company’s 103 year history. Net sales and revenues in the 
Truck and Other businesses of $13.71 billion were slightly lower than the $14.03 billion in 2007 as an increase in 
European truck sales was more than offset by decreased truck sales in North America and Australia.  

Cost of sales and revenues in the Truck and Other businesses were $11.74 billion in 2008, down 1.5% compared to 
$11.92 billion in 2007. Cost of sales and revenues declined primarily due to 6% lower truck deliveries partially 
offset by the weaker U.S. dollar vs. the euro and higher material costs related to higher crude oil, copper, steel and 
other commodities.

Research and development expenditures were $341.8 million in 2008, an increase of 34% from $255.5 million in 
2007 due to spending in preparation for EPA engine emission requirements in the U.S. in 2010, expenses related to 
the introduction of the Company’s proprietary 12.9 liter engine in North America and increased spending on 
vehicle updates in the U.S. and Europe.  

SG&A expense for Truck and Other declined to $470.2 million in 2008 compared to $491.4 million in 2007. This 
was due to $35.5 million of reductions in worldwide spending partially offset by $14.3 million of foreign currency 
translation effects, primarily the euro. The spending reductions resulted from staffing reductions, lower sales and 
marketing costs and lower general and administrative spending in the fourth quarter in response to the global 
recession. SG&A expense as a percent of revenues decreased to 3.4% in 2008 from 3.5% in 2007.  

Financial Services revenues increased to $1.26 billion in 2008 from $1.19 billion in 2007 as increased revenues in 
Europe and Mexico more than offset a decrease in the U.S. Financial Services income before taxes was $216.9 
million compared to $284.1 million in 2007 as the additional finance margin from asset growth in Europe and 
Mexico was reduced by higher provisions for credit losses in the U.S. and Europe.

Investment income declined to $84.6 million in 2008 compared to $95.4 million in 2007 due to lower invested 
balances and interest rates.

The 2008 effective income tax rate of 30.5% was comparable to the 30.4% in 2007. 

The Company’s return on revenues was 6.8% in 2008 and 8.1% in 2007.

PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries



Truck
PACCAR’s truck segment, which includes the manufacture and distribution of trucks and related aftermarket parts, 
accounted for 86%, 90% and 91% of revenues in 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. In North America, trucks 
are sold under the Kenworth and Peterbilt nameplates and, in Europe, under the DAF nameplate.

2009 Compared to 2008: 

Truck net sales and revenues:
  U.S. and Canada 
  Europe 
  Mexico, Australia and other 

Truck income before taxes 

The Company’s new truck deliveries are summarized below:

United States 
Canada 
U.S. and Canada 
Europe 
Mexico,  Australia and other 
Total units 

2009 

2008 

% change

$ 3,566.0 
  2,520.2 
907.8 
$ 6,994.0 
25.9 
$ 

2009 

  28,300 
4,400 
  32,700 
  22,200 
6,100 
  61,000 

$  4,823.7 
  6,624.8 
  2,098.9 
$ 13,547.4 
$  1,156.5 

2008 

  38,200 
6,700 
  44,900 
  63,700 
17,300 
 125,900 

(26)
(62)
(57)
(48)
(98)

% change

(26)
(34)
(27)
(65)
(65)
(52)

PACCAR’s worldwide truck sales and revenues were $6.99 billion in 2009 compared to $13.55 billion in 2008 due to 
lower market demand worldwide attributable to global recessionary conditions. 2009 truck net sales and revenues 
and income before income taxes were also affected by the translation of weaker foreign currencies, primarily the 
euro and British pound. The translation effect of all currencies decreased 2009 sales and revenues by $260.9 million 
and income before income taxes by $30.9 million compared to 2008.

In the U.S. and Canada, 2009 net sales and revenues decreased to $3.57 billion compared to $4.82 billion in 2008. 
Industry retail sales in the heavy duty market in U.S. and Canada declined 29% to 108,000 units in 2009 compared 
to 153,000 units in 2008 and were at their lowest levels since 1991. The Company’s market share was 25.1% in 2009 
and 26.0% in 2008. The medium duty market was 40,000 units in 2009 compared to 63,000 units in 2008. The 
Company achieved record medium duty market share of 15.3% in 2009 compared to 14.1% in 2008. 

In Europe, 2009 net sales and revenues decreased to $2.52 billion compared to $6.62 billion in 2008. The 15 tonne 
and above truck market in Western and Central Europe was 168,000 units compared to 330,000 units in 2008. The 
Company’s market share was a record 14.8% in 2009 compared to 14.2% in 2008. DAF market share in the 6 to 15 
tonne market in 2009 was 9.3%, the same as in 2008. The 6 to 15 tonne market was 51,000 units in 2009, compared 
to 79,000 units in 2008.

Net sales and revenues in Mexico, Australia and other countries outside the Company’s primary markets declined to 
$.91 billion in 2009 from $2.10 billion in 2008 due to lower new truck deliveries reflecting lower overall market 
demand. 

Truck segment income before income taxes decreased to $25.9 million in 2009 from $1.16 billion in 2008 from 
lower truck unit and aftermarket parts sales and margins in all markets, partially offset by lower research and 
development spending as well as lower SG&A spending. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net sales and revenues and gross margins for truck units and aftermarket parts are provided below. The aftermarket 
parts gross margin includes direct revenues and costs, but excludes certain truck segment costs.



Truck net sales and revenues:
  Trucks 
  Aftermarket parts 

Gross margin:
  Trucks 
  Aftermarket parts 

Gross margin %:
  Trucks 
  Aftermarket parts 

2009 

2008 

% change

$ 5,103.3 
  1,890.7 
$ 6,994.0 

$ 

(46.6) 
625.7 
$  579.1 

(.9)% 
33.1 % 
  8.3 % 

$ 11,281.3 
  2,266.1 
$ 13,547.4 

$  1,141.7 
795.2 
$  1,936.9 

  10.1% 
35.1% 
  14.3% 

(55)
(17)
(48)

  (104)
(21)
(70)

Total truck segment gross margins for 2009 decreased to 8.3% from 14.3% in 2008. The lower gross margins were 
primarily the result of lower truck gross margins. Gross margins on trucks declined to negative .9% in 2009, reflecting 
lower industry demand and reduced absorption of fixed costs resulting from the decline in truck production. 2009 
parts gross margins declined from the prior year primarily due to a sales mix shift to lower margin replacement parts.

2008 Compared to 2007: 

Truck net sales and revenues:
  U.S. and Canada 
  Europe 
  Mexico, Australia and other 

Truck income before taxes 

The Company’s new truck deliveries are summarized below:

United States 
Canada 
U.S. and Canada 
Europe 
Mexico,  Australia and other 
Total units 

2008 

2007 

% change

$  4,823.7 
  6,624.8 
  2,098.9 
$ 13,547.4 
$  1,156.5 

2008 

38,200 
6,700 
44,900 
63,700 
17,300 
 125,900 

$  5,648.8 
  5,859.6 
  2,345.9 
$ 13,854.3 
$  1,352.8 

2007 

  44,700 
8,300 
  53,000 
  60,100 
20,800 
 133,900 

(15)
13
(11)
(2)
(15)

% change

(15)
(19)
(15)
6
(17)
(6)

PACCAR’s worldwide truck sales and revenues were $13.55 billion in 2008 compared to $13.85 billion in 2007 due to 
higher demand for the Company’s trucks in Europe more than offset by lower demand in the U.S. and Canada, and 
other international markets. The impact of a weaker U.S. dollar relative to the Company’s other currencies (primarily 
the euro) increased revenues and pretax profit by approximately $445.0 million and $49.5 million, respectively.

In the U.S. and Canada, net sales and revenues decreased 15% to $4.82 billion from $5.65 billion in 2007 mainly as 
a result of fewer new truck deliveries. In the U.S. and Canada, Peterbilt and Kenworth delivered 44,900 heavy and 
medium duty trucks during 2008, a decrease of 8,100 units or 15% from 2007 primarily due to a lower truck market 
size. The Class 8 market decreased 13% to 153,000 units in 2008 from 176,000 units in 2007. PACCAR’s market 
share was 26.0% in 2008 compared to 26.4% in 2007. The medium duty market decreased 28% to 63,000 units.

PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


European net sales and revenues increased 13% to $6.62 billion from $5.86 billion in 2007 as DAF achieved higher 
market share in a similar sized truck market to 2007. DAF trucks delivered a record 63,700 units during 2008, a   
6% increase over 2007. The 15 tonne and above truck market in Western and Central Europe was 330,000 units 
compared to 337,000 units in 2007. DAF’s 2008 market share of the 15 tonne and above market increased to 14.2% 
compared to 13.9% in 2007. DAF market share in the 6 to 15 tonne market increased to 9.3% in 2008 from 8.3% in 
2007. In Europe, demand was strong for the Company’s high-quality trucks and parts during the first nine months 
of 2008, including growth in Central and Eastern Europe. Industry demand slowed throughout Europe in the 
fourth quarter. 

Net sales and revenues in Mexico, Australia and other countries outside the Company’s primary markets declined 
11% to $2.10 billion in 2008 due to lower new truck deliveries. Truck unit deliveries in Mexico, Australia and other 
countries outside the Company’s primary markets decreased 17%.

Truck income before taxes was $1.16 billion compared to $1.35 billion in 2007. The lower income reflects the effects 
of lower truck production and gross margins from reduced demand and higher material costs, partially mitigated 
by improved operating efficiency. 

Net sales and revenues and gross margins for truck units and aftermarket parts are provided below. The aftermarket 
parts gross margin includes direct revenues and costs, but excludes certain truck segment costs.

Truck net sales and revenues:
  Trucks 
  Aftermarket parts 

Gross margin:
  Trucks 
  Aftermarket parts 

Gross margin %:
  Trucks 
  Aftermarket parts 

2008 

2007 

% change

$ 11,281.3 
  2,266.1 
$ 13,547.4 

$  1,141.7 
795.2 
$  1,936.9 

10.1% 
35.1% 
  14.3% 

$ 11,571.3 
  2,283.0 
$ 13,854.3 

$  1,242.9 
816.7 
$  2,059.6 

  10.7% 
35.8% 
  14.9% 

(3)
(1)
(2)

(8)
(3)
(6)

Truck segment gross margin as a percentage of net sales and revenues was 14.3% in 2008 and 14.9% in 2007. The 
decrease in margin from 2007 resulted from the effects of weaker truck demand in North America and higher 
material costs partially mitigated by strong demand for the Company’s products in Europe in the first nine months.  

Truck Outlook
Worldwide recessionary economic conditions are expected to continue to affect demand for heavy duty trucks in 
2010. The heavy duty truck sales in the U.S. and Canada are expected to be in the range of 110,000–140,000 units, 
up slightly from 2009, reflecting general economic growth and an aging truck fleet. The current challenging 
economic conditions in Europe are expected to continue in 2010 with the market size of above 15-tonne vehicles 
expected to be in the range of 150,000–180,000 units. International markets are also expected to remain weak into 
2010. Research and development spending in 2010 is expected to be between $225-$250 million, focusing on new 
product development and manufacturing efficiency improvements. The Company will begin assembling PACCAR 
MX engines at the Columbus, Mississippi engine production facility in mid 2010. See the Forward Looking 
Statement section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis for factors that may affect this outlook.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial Services
The PACCAR Financial Services (PFS) segment, which includes wholly owned subsidiaries in the U.S., Canada, 
Mexico, Europe and Australia, derives its earnings primarily from financing or leasing PACCAR products. 

9

2009 Compared to 2008: 

New loan and lease volume:
  U.S. and Canada 
  Europe 
  Mexico and Australia 

Average earning assets:
  U.S. and Canada 
  Europe 
  Mexico and Australia 

Average earning assets by product:
Loans and finance leases 
  Dealer wholesale financing 
  Equipment on lease and other 

Revenues:
  U.S. and Canada 
  Europe 
  Mexico and Australia 

Revenue by product:

Loans and finance leases 
  Dealer wholesale financing 
  Equipment on lease and other 

Income before taxes 

2009 

2008 

% change

$ 1,175.0 
433.5 
306.1 
$ 1,914.6 

$ 4,795.5 
  2,535.9 
1,321.9 
$ 8,653.3 

$ 5,141.0 
  1,221.2 
2,291.1 
$ 8,653.3 

$  501.8 
318.5 
189.5 
$ 1,009.8 

$  449.3 
52.5 
508.0 
$ 1,009.8 
84.6 
$ 

$  1,674.0 
947.6 
728.6 
$  3,350.2 

$  5,692.4 
  3,065.6 
1,621.0 
$ 10,379.0 

$  6,295.3 
  1,693.0 
2,390.7 
$ 10,379.0 

$ 

602.9 
429.3 
230.7 
$  1,262.9 

$ 

567.3 
116.1 
579.5 
$  1,262.9 
216.9 
$ 

(30)
(54)
(58)
(43)

(16)
(17)
(18)
(17)

(18)
(28)
(4)
(17)

(17)
(26)
(18)
(20)

(21)
(55)
(12)
(20)
(61)

Revenues:
PFS revenues in 2009 declined 20% compared to 2008 due to lower average earning assets and lower yields 
primarily in the U.S., Canada, and in Europe. Average earning assets declined in 2009 due to lower new loan and 
lease volume in all markets and a reduction in dealer wholesale financing of new trucks. New loan and lease volume 
declined due to lower new PACCAR truck production. PFS market share in 2009 was 26%, down from 28% in 2008 
reflecting lower market share in the first half of 2009. 

PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
30

 At December 31, 

Percentage of retail loan and lease accounts 30+ days past-due:
U.S. and Canada 
Europe 
Mexico and Australia 
Total 

2009 

1.8% 
4.4% 
9.5% 
3.8% 

2008

2.6%
2.8%
6.2%
3.3%

Worldwide PFS accounts 30+ days past-due at December 31, 2009 were 3.8% of portfolio balances compared to 3.3% 
at December 31, 2008, due to a decline in freight tonnage, freight rates and customer cash flows in Europe and Mexico.

Interest income and fees in 2009 declined from 2008 due to lower average earning assets and lower asset yields 
summarized as follows:

Interest and fees – 2008  
Lower average asset balances  
Decrease in yield  
Interest and fees – 2009  

  $683.4
(131.3)
(50.3)
  $501.8

The decline in average earning assets was due to lower retail loan and lease business, as well as lower dealer wholesale 
financing, as dealer inventory levels reduced in Europe. Yield declined due to lower market interest rates.

Operating lease, rental and other income in 2009 of $508.0 million declined from the $579.5 million in 2008 due to 
lower average assets, lower rental utilization and a decrease in yields. The decline in average operating lease assets 
was due to lower new business volume. The lower rental utilization reflected the weaker economic environment and 
the decline in yields was due to lower market rates.

Expenses:
Interest and other borrowing expenses decreased in 2009 from 2008 due to lower average debt balances and lower 
borrowing rates as summarized below: 

Interest and other borrowing expenses – 2008  
Lower average debt balances  
Lower borrowing rates  
Interest and other borrowing expenses – 2009  

  $394.1
(73.3)
(29.0)
  $291.8

Average debt balances decreased due to the lower level of funding needed to fund the smaller financial services 
portfolio. Lower borrowing rates resulted due to lower commercial paper rates. 

2009 depreciation and other expenses increased to $442.5 million from $437.8 million in 2008. This resulted from 
higher depreciation partially offset by lower costs from a smaller portfolio. 2009 depreciation increased to $331.2 
million compared to $304.1 million in the prior year. The higher depreciation was from both an increase in 
impairments on existing operating lease assets of $19.6 million, as well as higher losses on returned operating lease 
assets of $20.1 million reflecting the impact of lower used truck prices.

SG&A expense of $86.5 million in 2009 declined by $24.7 million from $111.2 million in 2008. Lower spending was 
a result of focused efforts to reduce costs in response to global economic conditions and consisted primarily of 
lower staffing levels and travel costs. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
The provision for losses on receivables is summarized below:

31

U.S. and Canada 
Europe 
Mexico and Australia 

2009 

Decrease in 
allowance 
$ (14.1) 
  (2.0) 
  (1.3) 
$ (17.4) 

Provision 
for losses on 
receivables 
$   49.8 
  41.6 
 13.0 
$ 104.4 

2008
Increase 
(decrease) in 
allowance 
$ (5.8) 
  3.2 
.7 
$ (1.9) 

Provision for 
 losses on 
 receivables
$  79.9
  15.0
8.0
$ 102.9

Net 
Charge-offs 
$  85.7 
  11.8 
  7.3 
$ 104.8 

Net 
Charge-offs 

$  63.9 
  43.6 
 14.3 
$ 121.8 

The provision for losses on receivables in 2009 of $104.4 million was comparable to 2008 as higher net portfolio 
charge-offs in Europe, Mexico and Australia were offset by lower net charge-offs in the U.S. and Canada. There was 
a decrease in the allowance for losses in all markets due to declining receivable portfolios. 

2008 Compared to 2007: 

New loan and lease volume:
  U.S. and Canada 
  Europe 
  Mexico and Australia 

Average earning assets:
  U.S. and Canada 
  Europe 
  Mexico and Australia 

Average earning assets by product:
Loans and finance leases 
  Dealer wholesale financing 
  Equipment on lease and other 

Revenues:
  U.S. and Canada 
  Europe 
  Mexico and Australia 

Revenue by product:

Loans and finance leases 
  Dealer wholesale financing 
  Equipment on lease and other 

Income before taxes 

2008 

2007 

% change

$  1,674.0 
947.6 
728.6 
$  3,350.2 

$  5,692.4 
3,065.6 
1,621.0 
$ 10,379.0 

$  6,295.3 
1,693.0 
2,390.7 
$ 10,379.0 

$  602.9 
429.3 
230.7 
$  1,262.9 

$  567.3 
116.1 
579.5 
$  1,262.9 
$  216.9 

$  2,195.6 
923.5 
812.1 
$  3,931.2 

$  6,517.1 
2,360.9 
1,279.6 
$ 10,157.6 

$  6,461.9 
1,507.3 
2,188.4 
$ 10,157.6 

$  682.8 
320.2 
188.3 
$  1,191.3 

$  561.5 
111.3 
518.5 
$  1,191.3 
$  284.1 

(24)
3
(10)
(15)

(13)
30
27
2

(3)
12
9
2

(12)
34
23
6

1
4
12
6
(24)

PFS revenues increased 6% in 2008 to $1.26 billion from $1.19 billion in 2007 due to higher earning assets in all 
markets outside the U.S. and Canada partially offset by lower market interest rates. Revenues in the U.S. and Canada 
declined 12%, principally as a result of lower average assets. Total average assets declined in the U.S. and Canada due 
to lower new business volume from fewer new trucks sold and lower finance market share which declined from 
29% to 28%. The decline in share is due to competition from banks and independent finance companies. Revenues

PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
32

in Europe grew by 34% as average earning assets increased 30% from higher new loan and lease volume and 
wholesale flooring growth attributed to higher DAF truck production. PFS revenues in Mexico and Australia 
increased 23%, to $230.7 million, primarily due to increases in average earning assets which grew 27% as new loan 
and lease volume exceeded repayments. This was partially offset by lower interest rates. Worldwide new business 
volume was $3.35 billion in 2008 compared to $3.93 billion in 2007. Worldwide, PFS provided loan and lease 
financing for 28% of PACCAR new trucks delivered in 2008 compared to 29% in 2007.

Interest and other borrowing expenses and Depreciation and other of $831.9 million increased 10% from the 
$755.3 million in 2007. This was primarily due to higher depreciation expense on operating leases which increased 
to $304.1 million in 2008 from $238.6 million in 2007 as a result of an increase in average operating lease assets in 
service during 2008. Interest expense in 2008 was similar to 2007 as slightly higher average borrowings to support 
portfolio growth were offset by lower average borrowing rates. Selling, general and administrative expenses of 
$111.2 million were comparable to the prior year. 

Income before taxes was $216.9 million in 2008 compared to $284.1 million in 2007 primarily due to a higher 
provision for losses on receivables. Net portfolio charge-offs were $104.8 million compared to $25.8 million in 2007 
due to recessionary conditions in the U.S. and Canada and to a lesser extent in Europe. At December 31, 2008, the 
percentage of accounts 30+ days past-due was 3.3%, up from 2.0% at the end of 2007. The increase in the percentage 
of past-due accounts reflected the difficult economic conditions worldwide. The increase in past-due accounts in 
Mexico and Australia to 6.2% from 2.5% was primarily due to Mexico where a significant decline in the value of 
the peso compared to the dollar in the fourth quarter of 2008 resulted in cash flow difficulty for some customers.

Financial Services Outlook
Financial Services segment results are dependent on the generation of loans and leases and the related spread 
between the yields on loans and leases and borrowing costs, as well as access to liquidity to generate new business 
and the level of credit losses. The asset base in 2010 is expected to be comparable to 2009 levels. Recessionary 
economic conditions will continue to exert pressure on the profit margins of truck operators and challenge some 
customers ability to make timely payments to the Company. Improvement in past-due accounts and used truck 
values, fewer truck repossessions and voluntary truck returns are projected to benefit in 2010. See the Forward 
Looking Statement section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis for factors that may affect this outlook. 

Other Business
Included in Truck and Other is the Company’s winch manufacturing business. Sales from this business represent 
approximately 1% of net sales for 2009, 2008 and 2007.

L I Q U I D I T Y   A N D   C A P I TA L   R E S O U R C E S :

At December 31 

Cash and cash equivalents 
Marketable debt securities  

2009 

$ 1,912.0 
219.5 
$ 2,131.5 

2008 

$ 1,955.2 
175.4 
$ 2,130.6 

2007

$ 1,858.1
778.5
$ 2,636.6

The Company’s total cash and marketable debt securities increased $.9 million for the year ended December 31, 
2009, as a decrease in cash and cash equivalents of $43.2 million was more than offset by an increase in marketable 
securities of $44.1 million. 

 
 
 
 
 
The change in cash and cash equivalents is summarized below.

33

For Years Ended December 31 

2009 

2008 

2007

Operating Activities:
Net Income 
Net income items not affecting cash 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities  
Net cash provided by operating activities 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities 
Net cash used in financing activities 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash 
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year 

$  111.9 
874.3 
387.1 
  1,373.3 
310.6 
 (1,816.2) 
89.1 
(43.2) 
  1,955.2 
$ 1,912.0 

$ 1,017.9 
  882.2 
  (595.2) 
 1,304.9 
  (251.9) 
  (868.1) 
(87.8) 
97.1 
  1,858.1 
$ 1,955.2 

$ 1,227.3
  589.3
238.8
 2,055.4
 (1,296.8)
  (838.5)
85.5
5.6
  1,852.5
$ 1,858.1

2009 Compared to 2008: 
Operating activities: The Company’s operating cash flow increased $68.4 million compared to 2008. A decrease in 
net income of $906.0 million was more than offset by a reduction in receivables of $1,135.6 million primarily 
related to $888.1 million of higher collections of wholesale receivables reflecting a reduction in funding of dealer 
new truck inventory, predominately in Europe. In addition there was a reduction of trade receivables of $218.7 
million as a result of lower sales levels.

Investing activities: Cash provided by investing activities increased by $562.5 million to $310.6 million in 2009 
compared to 2008. Cash was provided by a larger decrease in the retail loan and lease portfolio of $539.8 million as 
collections on outstanding balances exceeded net new loan and lease volume reflecting lower new truck sales. 
Investments in capital equipment decreased $579.0 million, primarily due to reduced expenditures related to the 
current economic environment offset by $614.9 million of lower cash provided by net purchases and sales of 
marketable securities compared to 2008.

Financing activities: The cash used in financing activities increased $948.1 million to $1,816.2 million in 2009 due 
to higher net debt repayments of $1,601.7 million related to lower funding needed to finance a smaller financial 
services asset base. This was partially offset by no stock repurchases in 2009 compared to $230.6 million in 2008 
and a lower dividend of $232.1 million compared to $629.2 million in 2008. 

2008 Compared to 2007: 
Operating activities: The Company’s operating cash flow of $1,304.9 million decreased $750.5 million compared to 
2007. Net income in 2008 of $1,017.9 million decreased by $209.4 million compared to 2007. This was more than 
offset by a $292.9 million increase relating to net income items not affecting cash to $882.2 million in 2008. This is 
mainly from increased depreciation on higher depreciable assets and higher deferred taxes related to tax incentive 
depreciation in the U.S. Changes in operating assets and liabilities were a net cash outflow in 2008 of $595.2 million 
compared to an inflow of $238.8 million in 2007. The change of $834.0 million was due in part to purchasing 
finished goods to secure inventory from a supplier exiting the business. In addition, $246.3 million of cash was used 
for increased funding of dealer inventory by the Company’s Financial Services segment primarily in Europe due to 
the abrupt market slowdown in the fourth quarter compared to a reduction of $81.3 million in 2007. 

Investing activities: Cash used in investing activities decreased to $251.9 million in 2008 from $1,296.8 million in 
2007. The Company liquidated $572.1 million of its marketable debt securities portfolio to improve liquidity due to 
the more difficult credit markets. The Financial Services segment experienced lower new loan and lease originations 
from lower demand for truck financing.

PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
34

Financing activities: 2008 financing cash outflow of $868.1 million was slightly higher than 2007 as the effect of 
lower net borrowings from a declining financial services asset base was offset by $129.9 million of lower treasury 
stock repurchases in 2008 and $107.5 million of lower cash dividends as a result of a smaller extra dividend in 2008.

Credit Lines and Other:
The Company has line of credit arrangements of $3.67 billion, of which $3.35 billion was unused at the end of 
December 2009. Included in these arrangements are $3.0 billion of syndicated bank facilities. Of the $3.0 billion 
bank facilities, $2.0 billion matures in June 2010 and $1.0 billion matures in June 2012. The Company intends to 
replace these credit facilities as they expire with facilities of similar amounts and duration. These credit facilities are 
maintained primarily to provide backup liquidity for commercial paper borrowings and maturing medium-term 
notes. There were no borrowings under the syndicated bank lines for the year ended December 31, 2009.

PACCAR Inc periodically files shelf registrations under the Securities Act of 1933. The total amount of medium-
term notes outstanding for PACCAR Inc as of December 31, 2009 is $870.0 million. The current registration expires 
in 2011 and does not limit the principal amount of debt securities that may be issued during the period.

The Company believes its strong liquidity position and AA- investment grade credit rating will continue to provide 
financial stability and access to capital markets at competitive interest rates.

In October 2007, PACCAR’s Board of Directors approved the repurchase of $300 million of the Company’s 
common stock. Through December 31, 2009, $292 million of shares have been repurchased. In July 2008, PACCAR’s 
Board of Directors approved the repurchase of an additional $300 million of the Company’s common stock. No 
shares have been repurchased pursuant to the July 2008 authorization.

Truck and Other
The Company provides funding for working capital, capital expenditures, research and development, dividends, 
stock repurchases and other business initiatives and commitments primarily from cash provided by operations. 
Management expects this method of funding to continue in the future. Long-term debt totaled $172.3 million 
as of December 31, 2009. 

Expenditures for property, plant and equipment in 2009 totaled $127.7 million compared to $462.8 million in 2008 
as the Company reduced its spending to reflect the current economic environment. Over the last ten years, the 
Company’s combined investments in worldwide capital projects and research and development totaled $3.77 billion 
which have significantly increased capacity, efficiency and quality of the Company’s premier products.

Capital spending in 2010 is expected to be approximately $175 to $200 million. Spending on research and 
development in 2010 is expected to be $225 to $250 million. PACCAR’s will continue to focus on manufacturing 
efficiency improvements, engine development and new product programs.

Financial Services
The Company funds its financial services activities primarily from collections on existing finance receivables and 
borrowings in the capital markets. An additional source of funds is loans from other PACCAR companies. 

The primary sources of borrowings in the capital markets are commercial paper and medium-term notes issued in 
the public markets and, to a lesser extent, bank loans. The majority of the medium-term notes are issued by 
PACCAR’s largest financial services subsidiary, PACCAR Financial Corp. (PFC). 

In November 2009, PFC filed a shelf registration under the Securities Act of 1933. In December 2009, PFC issued 
$250.0 million of fixed rate medium-term notes under this registration. The registration expires in 2012 and does 
not limit the principal amount of debt securities that may be issued during the period. The total amount of 
medium-term notes outstanding for PFC as of December 31, 2009, was $1,148.5 million. 

35

In the third quarter of 2009, PACCAR’s European finance subsidiary, PACCAR Financial Europe, renewed the 
registration of a €1.5 billion medium-term note program with the London Stock Exchange. On December 31, 2009, 
€850 million remained available for issuance. This program is renewable annually through the filing of a new 
prospectus. 

In June 2008, PACCAR Mexico registered a 7.0 billion peso medium-term note program with the Comision Nacional 
Bancaria y de Valores. The registration expires in 2012 and at December 31, 2009, 6.1 billion pesos remained available 
for issuance.

PACCAR believes its Financial Services companies will be able to continue funding receivables, servicing debt and 
paying dividends through internally generated funds, access to public and private debt markets and lines of credit.

Commitments
The following summarizes the Company’s contractual cash commitments at December 31, 2009:

Borrowings* 
Interest on term debt** 
Operating leases 
Purchase obligations 
Other obligations 

Within 
1 Year 
$ 3,580.5 
123.8 
27.0 
147.2 
11.1 
$ 3,889.6 

Maturity

1-3 Years 
$ 1,950.1 
127.8 
27.2 
237.3 
6.4 
$ 2,348.8 

3-5 Years 
$ 522.6 
  39.3 
8.8 
2.0 
2.2 
$ 574.9 

More than 
5 Years 

$ 

.5 

 17.4 
$ 17.9 

Total
$ 6,053.2
  290.9
63.5
  386.5
37.1
$ 6,831.2

*  Borrowings also include commercial paper and other short-term debt.
**  Includes interest on fixed- and floating-rate term debt. Interest on floating-rate debt is based on the applicable  
  market rates at December 31, 2009.

The Company had $6.83 billion of cash commitments. Of the total cash commitments for borrowings and interest 
on term debt, $6.14 billion were related to the Financial Services segment. As described in Note J of the consolidated 
financial statements, borrowings consist primarily of term notes and commercial paper issued by the Financial Services 
segment. The Company expects to fund its maturing Financial Services debt obligations principally from funds 
provided by collections from customers on loans and lease contracts, as well as from the proceeds of commercial 
paper and medium-term note borrowings. Purchase obligations are the Company’s contractual commitment to 
acquire future production inventory and capital equipment. Other obligations include deferred cash compensation.

PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
36

The Company’s other commitments include the following at December 31, 2009:

Letters of credit 
Loan and lease commitments 
Equipment acquisition commitments 
Residual value guarantees 

Within 
1 Year 
$  18.4 
  105.3 

  106.3 
$ 230.0 

Commitment Expiration

1-3 Years 
$  2.0 

3-5 Years 
.1 
$ 

More than 
5 Years 

  53.4 
  118.8 
$ 174.2 

  72.9 
$ 73.0 

$ 10.0 
$ 10.0 

Total
$  20.5
 105.3
  53.4
 308.0
$ 487.2

Loan and lease commitments are for funding new retail loan and lease contracts. Equipment acquisition commitments 
require the Company, under specified circumstances, to purchase equipment. Residual value guarantees represent 
the Company’s commitment to acquire trucks at a guaranteed value if the customer decides to return the truck at a 
specified date in the future. 

i m pa c t   o f   e n v i r o n m e n ta l   m at t e r s :
The Company, its competitors and industry in general are subject to various domestic and foreign requirements 
relating to the environment. The Company believes its policies, practices and procedures are designed to prevent 
unreasonable risk of environmental damage and that its handling, use and disposal of hazardous or toxic substances 
have been in accordance with environmental laws and regulations enacted at the time such use and disposal occurred.

The Company is involved in various stages of investigations and cleanup actions in different countries related to 
environmental matters. In certain of these matters, the Company has been designated as a “potentially responsible 
party” by domestic and foreign environmental agencies. The Company has provided an accrual for the estimated 
costs to investigate and complete cleanup actions where it is probable that the Company will incur such costs in the 
future. Expenditures related to environmental activities in 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $1.3 million, $3.8 million and 
$1.9 million, respectively. Management expects that these matters will not have a significant effect on the 
Company’s consolidated cash flow, liquidity or financial condition.

c r i t i c a l   a c c o u n t i n g   p o l i c i e s :
In the preparation of the Company’s financial statements, in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting 
principles, management uses estimates and makes judgments and assumptions that affect asset and liability values 
and the amounts reported as income and expense during the periods presented. The following are accounting 
policies which, in the opinion of management, are particularly sensitive and which, if actual results are different 
from estimates used by management, may have a material impact on the financial statements. 

Operating Leases
The accounting for trucks sold pursuant to agreements accounted for as operating leases is discussed in Notes A 
and F of the consolidated financial statements. In determining its estimate of the residual value of such vehicles, the 
Company considers the length of the lease term, the truck model, the expected usage of the truck and anticipated 
market demand. Operating lease terms generally range from three to seven years. The resulting residual values on 
operating leases generally range between 30% and 50% of original equipment cost. If the sales price of the trucks 
at the end of the term of the agreement differs from the Company’s estimate, a gain or loss will result. 

Future market conditions, changes in government regulations and other factors outside the Company’s control could 
impact the ultimate sales price of trucks returned under these contracts. Residual values are reviewed regularly and 
adjusted if market conditions warrant.  A decrease in the estimated equipment residual values would increase annual 
depreciation expense over the remaining lease term. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
During 2007 and 2008 market values on vehicles returning upon operating lease maturity were generally higher than 
the residual values on these vehicles resulting in a decrease of depreciation expense of $15.5 million and $6.9 million, 
respectively. During 2009, lower market values on trucks returning upon lease maturity, as well as impairments on 
existing operating leases resulted in additional depreciation expense of $45.6 million. 

37

At December 31, 2009, the aggregate residual value of equipment on operating leases in the Financial Services 
segment and residual value guarantee on trucks accounted for as operating leases in the Truck segment was $1.14 
billion. A 10% decrease in used truck values worldwide, expected to persist over the remaining maturities of the 
Company’s operating leases, would reduce residual values estimates and result in the Company recording 
approximately $30 million of additional depreciation per year. 

Allowance for Credit Losses
The accounting for allowance for credit losses related to the Company’s loans and finance leases is discussed in 
Note E of the consolidated financial statements. The Company determines the allowance for credit losses on 
financial services retail and wholesale receivables based on historical loss information, using past-due account data, 
current market conditions and expectations about the future. The allowance for credit losses consists of both a 
specific reserve and a general reserve based on estimates, including assumptions regarding the likelihood of collecting 
current and past-due accounts, repossession rates and the recovery rate on the underlying collateral based on used 
truck values and other pledged collateral or recourse. The Company specifically evaluates large retail and wholesale 
accounts with past-due balances or that otherwise are deemed to be at a higher risk of credit loss. All other past-due 
customers, dealers and current accounts are evaluated as a group. 

The Company has developed a range of specific loss estimates for each of its portfolios by country based on historical 
experience, taking into account loss frequency and severity in both strong and weak truck market conditions. A 
projection is made of the range of estimated credit losses inherent in the portfolio from which an amount is 
determined as probable based on current market conditions and other factors impacting the creditworthiness of the 
Company’s borrowers and their ability to repay. The projected amount is then compared to the allowance for credit 
loss balance and an appropriate adjustment is made. 

The adequacy of the allowance is evaluated quarterly based on the most recent information and expectations about 
the future. As accounts become past due, the likelihood increases they will not be fully collected. The Company’s 
experience indicates the probability of not fully collecting past-due accounts range between 20% and 80%. Over the 
past three years, the Company’s year-end 30+ days past-due accounts have ranged between 2.0% and 3.8% of 
average loan and lease receivables. Historically, a 100 basis point increase in the 30+ days past-due percentage has 
resulted in an increase in future credit losses of 10 to 35 basis points of average receivables. Past-dues were 3.8% at 
December 31, 2009. If past-dues were 100 basis points higher or 4.8% as of December 31, 2009, the Company’s 
estimate of future credit losses would likely have increased by approximately $5 to $20 million depending on the extent 
of the past-dues, the estimated value of the collateral as compared to amounts owed and general economic factors. 

Product Warranty
The accounting for product warranty is discussed in Note I of the consolidated financial statements. The expenses 
related to product warranty are estimated and recorded at the time products are sold based on historical and current 
data and reasonable expectations for the future regarding the frequency and cost of warranty claims, net of recoveries. 
Management takes actions to minimize warranty costs through quality-improvement programs; however, actual claim 
costs incurred could materially differ from the estimated amounts and require adjustments to the reserve. Historically 
those adjustments have not been material. Over the past three years, the Company’s year-end warranty expense as a 
percentage of net sales and revenues has ranged between 1.2% and 1.3%. For 2009, warranty expense was 1.2% of 
net sales and revenues. If warranty expense were .2% higher as a percentage of truck net sales and revenues in 2009, 
warranty expense would have increased by approximately $17 million. 

PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries

38

Pension Benefits
The Company’s accounting for employee pension benefit costs and obligations is based on management 
assumptions about the future used by actuaries to estimate net costs and liabilities. These assumptions include 
discount rates, long-term rates of return on plan assets, inflation rates, retirement rates, mortality rates and other 
factors. Management bases these assumptions on historical results, the current environment and reasonable 
estimates of future events. 

The discount rate for pension benefits is based on market interest rates of high-quality corporate bonds with a 
maturity profile that matches the timing of the projected benefit payments of the plans. Changes in the discount rate 
affect the valuation of the plan benefits obligation and funded status of the plans. The long-term rate of return on 
plan assets is based on projected returns for each asset class and relative weighting of those asset classes in the plans.

Because differences between actual results and the assumptions for returns on plan assets, retirement rates and 
mortality rates are accumulated and amortized into expense over future periods, management does not believe 
these differences or a typical percentage change in these assumptions worldwide would have a material effect on its 
financial results in the next year. The most significant assumption which could negatively affect pension expense is 
a decrease in the discount rate. If the discount rate was to decrease .5%, 2009 net pension expense would increase 
to $36.8 million from $25.3 million, and the projected benefit obligation would increase $97.1 million to $1,421.9 
million from $1,324.8 million.

Income Taxes 
The accounting for income taxes is discussed in Note N of the consolidated financial statements. The Company 
calculates income tax expense on pretax income based on current tax law. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are 
recorded for future tax consequences on temporary differences between recorded amounts in the financial statements 
and their respective tax basis. The determination of income tax expense requires management estimates and involves 
judgment regarding indefinitely reinvested foreign earnings, jurisdictional mix of earnings and future outcomes 
regarding tax law issues included in tax returns. The Company updates its assumptions based on all of these factors 
each quarter as well as new information on tax laws and differences between estimated tax returns and actual returns 
when filed. If the Company’s assessment of these matters changes, the effect is accounted for in earnings in the 
period the change is made. 

F o rwa r d - l o o k i n g   s tat e m e n t s :
Certain information presented in this report contains forward-looking statements made pursuant to the Private 
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which are subject to risks and uncertainties that may affect actual results. 
Risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: a significant decline in industry sales; competitive pressures; 
reduced market share; reduced availability of or higher prices for fuel; increased safety, emissions, or other regulations 
resulting in higher costs and/or sales restrictions; currency or commodity price fluctuations; lower used truck prices; 
insufficient or under-utilization of manufacturing capacity; supplier interruptions; insufficient liquidity in the 
capital markets; fluctuations in interest rates; changes in the levels of the Financial Services segment new business 
volume due to unit fluctuations in new PACCAR truck sales; changes affecting the profitability of truck owners and 
operators; price changes impacting equipment costs and residual values; insufficient supplier capacity or access to 
raw materials; labor disruptions; shortages of commercial truck drivers; increased warranty costs or litigation; or 
legislative and governmental regulations. A more detailed description of these and other risks is included under the 
heading Part 1, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended 
December 31, 2009. 

c o n s o l i d a t e d   s t a t e m e n t s   o f  i n c o m e

Year  Ended  December  31 

truck  and  other:

Net sales and revenues 

Cost of sales and revenues 
Research and development 
Selling, general and administrative 
Curtailment gain 
Interest and other expense (income), net 

Truck and Other Income Before Income Taxes 

financial  services:

Interest and fees 
Operating lease, rental and other income 
Revenues  

Interest and other borrowing expenses 
Depreciation and other 
Selling, general and administrative 
Provision for losses on receivables 

Financial Services Income Before Income Taxes 

Investment income 
Total Income Before Income Taxes  
Income taxes 
Net Income 

Net Income Per Share 

Basic   
Diluted 

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding  

Basic   
Diluted 
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

2009 

 2008 

2007

39

 (millions except per share data)

 $  7,076.7 

 $13,709.6 

 $14,030.4

  6,483.4 
199.2 
348.4 
(66.0)
43.6 
  7,008.6 
68.1 

501.8 
508.0 
  1,009.8 

291.8 
442.5 
86.5 
104.4 
925.2 
84.6 

22.3 
175.0 
63.1 
 $     111.9 

  11,736.9 
341.8 
470.2 

(1.8) 
  12,547.1 
  1,162.5 

683.4 
579.5 
  1,262.9 

394.1 
437.8 
111.2 
102.9 
  1,046.0 
216.9 

84.6 
  1,464.0 
446.1 
 $  1,017.9 

  11,917.3
255.5
491.4

(18.6)
  12,645.6
  1,384.8

672.8
518.5
  1,191.3

391.2
364.1
110.9
41.0
907.2
284.1

95.4
  1,764.3
537.0
 $  1,227.3

$         .31 
$         .31 

$ 
$ 

2.79 
2.78 

$ 
$ 

3.31
3.29

      363.8 
      364.9 

364.2 
365.9 

371.1
373.3

PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
c o n s o l i d a t e d   b a l a n c e   s h e e t s

40

a s s e t s

December  31 

truck  and  other:

Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents 
Trade and other receivables, net  
Marketable debt securities 
Inventories 
Other current assets 
Total Truck and Other Current Assets 

Equipment on operating leases, net 
Property, plant and equipment, net 
Other noncurrent assets 
Total Truck and Other Assets 

financial  services:

Cash and cash equivalents 
Finance and other receivables, net 
Equipment on operating leases, net 
Other assets 
Total Financial Services Assets 

2009 

2008 

(millions of dollars)

$  1,836.5 
554.7 
219.5 
632.1 
224.3 
  3,467.1 

503.8 
  1,757.7 
409.1 
  6,137.7 

$  1,899.2
698.7
175.4
658.1
211.7
  3,643.1

425.3
  1,782.8
368.2
  6,219.4

75.5 
  6,497.7 
  1,513.2 
344.9 
  8,431.3 
$14,569.0 

56.0
  8,036.4
  1,534.8
403.2
  10,030.4
 $16,249.8

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
l i a b i l i t i e s   a n d   s t o c k h o l d e r s ’   e q u i t y

December  31 

truck  and  other: 

Current Liabilities
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other 
Dividend payable 
Total Truck and Other Current Liabilities 
Long‑term debt 
Residual value guarantees and deferred revenues 
Other liabilities 
Total Truck and Other Liabilities 

financial  services:

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other 
Commercial paper and bank loans 
Term notes 
Deferred taxes and other liabilities 
Total Financial Services Liabilities 

stockholder’s  equity

Preferred stock, no par value – authorized 1.0 million shares, none issued
Common stock, $1 par value – authorized 1.2 billion shares;

issued 364.4 million and 363.1 million shares 

Additional paid‑in capital 
Treasury stock – at cost 
Retained earnings 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) 
Total Stockholders’ Equity 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

2009 

2008

(millions of dollars)

41 

 $  1,490.0 

  1,490.0 
172.3 
547.2 
405.3 
  2,614.8 

215.2 
  3,011.2 
  2,889.3 
734.8 
  6,850.5 

$  1,792.3
36.3
  1,828.6
19.3
470.8
636.6
  2,955.3

249.2
  3,576.2
  3,889.3
733.1
  8,447.8

364.4 
80.0 
(17.4) 
  4,640.5 
36.2 
  5,103.7 
$14,569.0 

363.1
46.1
(17.4)
  4,724.7
(269.8)
  4,846.7
 $16,249.8

PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
c o n s o l i d a t e d   s t a t e m e n t s   o f   c a s h   f l o ws

42

Year  Ended  December  31 

operating  activities: 

Net income 
Items included in net income not affecting cash:
  Depreciation and amortization:

  Property, plant and equipment 
  Equipment on operating leases and other 

  Provision for losses on financial services receivables 
  Curtailment gain 
  Gain on sale of property 
  Deferred taxes 
  Other, net 
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
  Decrease (increase) in assets other than cash and equivalents:

  Receivables:

Trade and other 

  Wholesale receivables on new trucks 

Sales-type finance leases and dealer direct loans on  
 new trucks 

Inventories 
  Other, net 
(Decrease) increase in liabilities:
  Accounts payable and accrued expenses 
  Residual value guarantees and deferred revenues 
  Pension and post retirement contributions 
  Other, net 

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities 

investing  activities:

Retail loans and direct financing leases originated 
Collections on retail loans and direct financing leases 
Net decrease in wholesale receivables on used equipment 
Marketable securities purchases 
Marketable securities sales and maturities 
Acquisition of property, plant and equipment 
Acquisition of equipment for operating leases 
Proceeds from asset disposals 
Other, net 
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities 

financing  activities:

Cash dividends paid 
Purchase of treasury stock 
Stock compensation transactions 
Net decrease in commercial paper and short-term bank loans 
Proceeds from long-term debt 
Payments on long-term debt 
Net Cash Used in Financing Activities 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash 
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash and Cash Equivalents 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at beginning of year 
Cash and Cash Equivalents at end of year 
See notes to consolidated financial statements. 

2009 

2008 

2007

(millions of dollars)

  $   111.9 

$1,017.9 

 $1,227.3

188.0 
450.1 
104.4 
(66.0)
.9 
159.7 
37.2 

163.2 
641.8 

81.6 
53.4 
8.1 

(271.8) 
48.2 
(176.6) 
(160.8) 
  1,373.3 

  (1,282.2) 
  2,285.5 
3.5 
(288.3) 
245.5 
(127.7) 
(843.3) 
317.6 

310.6 

(232.1) 

17.6 
(789.8) 
  1,373.0 
  (2,184.9) 
  (1,816.2) 
89.1 
(43.2) 
  1,955.2 
  $1,912.0 

226.5 
422.9 
102.9 

131.0 
(1.1) 

(55.5) 
(246.3) 

52.8 
(85.2) 
8.8 

(239.3) 
118.1 
(68.0) 
(80.6) 
  1,304.9 

  (2,307.5) 
  2,771.0 
10.4 
(667.3) 
  1,239.4 
(462.8) 
  (1,087.2) 
239.3 
12.8 
(251.9) 

(629.2) 
(230.6) 
11.5 
(482.0) 
  1,190.9 
(728.7) 
(868.1) 
(87.8) 
97.1 
  1,858.1 
$1,955.2 

196.4
330.0
41.0

(21.7)
38.3
5.3

143.6
81.3

40.3
114.4
16.8

(277.6)
85.1
(16.8)
51.7
  2,055.4

  (3,116.6)
  2,837.3
13.7
  (1,282.9)
  1,345.5
(425.7)
(841.7)
240.1
(66.5)
  (1,296.8)

(736.7)
(360.5)
30.8
(366.1)
879.5
(285.5)
(838.5)
85.5
5.6
  1,852.5
 $1,858.1

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
c o n s o l i d a t e d   s t a t e m e n t s   o f   s t o c k h o l d e r s ’   e q u i t y

December  31 

common  stock,  $1  par  value:

Balance at beginning of year 
Treasury stock retirement 
50% stock dividend 
Stock compensation 
Balance at end of year 

additional  paid-in  capital: 
Balance at beginning of year 
Treasury stock retirement 
Stock compensation and tax benefit 
Balance at end of year 

treasury  stock,  at  cost:
Balance at beginning of year 
Purchases: (shares) 2008-5.1; 2007-5.1 
Retirements 
Balance at end of year 

retained  earnings:
Balance at beginning of year 
Net income 
Cash dividends declared on common stock,
  per share: 2009-$.54; 2008-$.82; 2007-$1.65 
Treasury stock retirement 
50% stock dividend 
Balance at end of year 

accumulated  other  comprehensive  income  (loss):
Balance at beginning of year 
Other comprehensive income (loss) 
Balance at end of year 
Total Stockholders’ Equity 
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

2009 

2008 

2007

43

 (millions except per share data)

 $     363.1 

$  368.4 
(5.9) 

1.3 
364.4 

46.1 

33.9 
80.0 

(17.4) 

(17.4) 

.6 
363.1 

37.7 
(14.0) 
22.4 
46.1 

(61.7) 
(230.6) 
274.9 
(17.4) 

  4,724.7 
111.9 

  4,260.6 
  1,017.9 

(196.1) 

(298.8) 
(255.0) 

  4,640.5 

  4,724.7 

(269.8) 
306.0 
36.2 
$ 5,103.7 

  408.1 
(677.9) 
(269.8) 
$ 4,846.7 

$  248.5
(3.8)
122.8
.9
368.4

27.5
(33.8)
44.0
37.7

(2.1)
(359.6)
300.0
(61.7)

  4,026.1
  1,227.3

(607.6)
(262.4)
(122.8)
  4,260.6

  156.2
251.9
408.1
$ 5,013.1

PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
c o n s o l i d a t e d   s t a t e m e n t s   o f   c o m p r e h e n s i v e   i n c o m e

44

Year  Ended  December  31 

Net income 
Other comprehensive income (loss):
  Unrealized (losses) gains on derivative contracts

 Losses arising during the period 
  Tax effect 
 Reclassification adjustment 
  Tax effect 

  Unrealized (losses) gains on investments

 Net holding (loss) gain 
  Tax effect 
 Reclassification adjustment 
  Tax effect 

  Pension and postretirement

 Gains (losses) arising during the period 
  Tax effect 
 Reclassification adjustment 
  Tax effect 

Foreign currency translation gains (losses) 

Net other comprehensive income (loss) 
Comprehensive Income 
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

2009 

2008 

2007

(millions of dollars)

  $111.9 

   $1,017.9 

  $1,227.3

(71.6) 
21.3 
119.9 
(35.7) 
33.9 

(.3) 
.1 
.7 
(.2) 
.3 

73.0 
(32.1) 
11.2 
(3.9) 
48.2 
223.6 
306.0 
  $417.9 

(85.5) 
24.7 
(17.4) 
4.1 
(74.1) 

2.9 
(.9) 
(5.1) 
1.8 
(1.3) 

(395.1) 
144.7 
6.0 
(2.1) 
(246.5) 
(356.0) 
(677.9) 
  $   340.0 

(32.5)
15.9
(14.8)
5.6
(25.8)

5.2
(2.1)
.2
(.1)
3.2

87.0
(32.2)
12.7
(4.6)
62.9
211.6
251.9
 $1,479.2

n o t e s   t o   c o n s o l id a t e d   f i n a n c i a l   s t a t e m e n t s

December  31,  2009,  2008  and  2007  (currencies  in  millions)

a .   s i g n i f i c a n t   a c c o u n t i n g   p o l i c i e s 

Description of Operations: PACCAR Inc (the Company or PACCAR) is a multinational company operating in two 
segments: (1) the design, manufacture and distribution of light, medium and heavy duty commercial trucks and 
related aftermarket parts and (2) finance and leasing products and services provided to customers and dealers. 
PACCAR’s sales and revenues are derived primarily from North America and Europe. The Company also operates in 
Australia and sells trucks and parts outside its primary markets to customers in Asia, Africa and South America.

Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its 
wholly owned domestic and foreign subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are 
eliminated in consolidation. 

Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally 
accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts 
reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. 

Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash equivalents consist of liquid investments with a maturity at date of purchase of 
three months or less.

Trade and Other Receivables: The Company’s trade and other receivables are recorded at cost on the balance sheet 
net of allowances.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
n o t e s   t o   c o n s o l i D a t eD   f i n a n c i a l   s t a t e m e n t s

December  31,  2009,  2008  and  2007  (currencies  in  millions)

Long-lived Assets, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets: The Company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived 
assets (including property and equipment, goodwill and other intangible assets) when events and circumstances 
warrant such a review. Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis. Impairment charges were insignificant 
during the three years ended December 31, 2009.

45

Revenue Recognition: Substantially all sales and revenues of trucks and related aftermarket parts are recorded by the 
Company when products are shipped to dealers or customers, except for certain truck shipments that are subject to 
a residual value guarantee to the customer. Revenues related to these shipments are recognized on a straight-line 
basis over the guarantee period (see Note F). At the time certain truck and parts sales to a dealer are recognized, the 
Company records an estimate of the future sales incentive costs related to such sales. The estimate is based on 
historical data and announced incentive programs.

Interest income from finance and other receivables is recognized using the interest method. Certain loan origination 
costs are deferred and amortized to interest income over the expected life of the contracts, generally three to six 
years, using the straight line method which approximates the interest method. For operating leases, rental revenue is 
recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Recognition of interest income and rental revenue is 
suspended when management determines that collection is not probable (generally after 90 days past the 
contractual due date). Recognition is resumed if the receivable becomes contractually current and the collection of 
amounts is again considered probable. Payments received while the loan is in non-accrual status are applied to 
interest and principal amounts in accordance with the contractual terms.

Foreign Currency Translation: For most of PACCAR’s foreign subsidiaries, the local currency is the functional 
currency. All assets and liabilities are translated at year-end exchange rates and all income statement amounts are 
translated at the weighted average rates for the period. Translation adjustments are recorded in accumulated other 
comprehensive income (loss), a component of stockholders’ equity. PACCAR uses the U.S. dollar as the functional 
currency for its Mexican subsidiaries. Accordingly, inventories, cost of sales, property, plant and equipment, and 
depreciation are remeasured at historical rates and resulting adjustments are included in net income.

Earnings per Share: Basic earnings per common share are computed by dividing earnings by the weighted average 
number of commons shares outstanding, plus the effect of any participating securities. Diluted earnings per 
common share are computed assuming that all potentially dilutive securities are converted into common shares 
under the treasury stock method. The dilutive and antidilutive options are shown separately in the table below.

Year Ended December 31, 

Additional shares 
Antidilutive options 

2009 

1,103,600 
2,290,400 

2008 

1,721,300 
1,397,800 

2007

2,206,800

New Accounting Pronouncements: The Company adopted Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments 
and Hedging Activities (FAS 161) effective January 1, 2009. FAS 161 amends and expands the disclosure requirements 
for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Accordingly, the Company’s disclosure in Note P has been updated 
to comply with this standard.

The Company adopted Statement No. 165, Subsequent Events effective July 1, 2009, with no significant effect on the 
financial statements.

The Company adopted FASB Staff Position FAS 132(R)-1, Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan 
Assets effective for the year ended December 31, 2009. FSP FAS 132(R)-1 requires additional disclosures relating to 
investment of plan assets. Accordingly, the Company’s disclosure in Note M has been updated to comply with this 
standard.

Subsequent Events: The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date the financial statements were 
issued on February 26, 2010.

PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries

 
 
n o t e s   t o   c o n s o l i D a t eD   f i n a n c i a l   s t a t e m e n t s

December  31,  2009,  2008  and  2007  (currencies  in  millions)

46

b .   i n v e s t m e n t s   i n   m a r k e ta b l e   s e c u r i t i e s

The Company’s investments in marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale. These investments are stated 
at fair value with any unrealized gains or losses, net of tax, included as a component of accumulated other 
comprehensive income. The proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities during 2009 were $245.5. 
Gross realized gains and losses were $1.2, $5.1, and nil, and $.1, $.1 and $.1 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 
2008 and 2007, respectively.

The cost of marketable debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to 
maturity. Amortization, accretion, interest and dividend income and realized gains and losses are included in 
investment income. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method.

Marketable debt securities consisted of the following at December 31:

2009 

U.S. government and agency securities 
U.S. tax-exempt securities 
U.S. corporate securities 
Non U.S. corporate securities 
Non U.S. government securities 
Other debt securities 

2008 

U.S. tax-exempt securities 
Non U.S. corporate securities 
Non U.S. government securities 

amortized 
cost 

unrealized 
gains 

unrealized 
losses 

$  6.5 
 141.2 
  22.0 
  22.0 
  12.2 
14.2 
$ 218.1 

amortized 
cost 

$ 167.2 
4.3 
2.9 
$ 174.4 

$  1.3 
.2 

$ 

.1 

$  1.5 

$ 

.1 

unrealized 
gains 

$  1.7 

unrealized 
losses 

$ 

.4 
.3 

$  1.7 

$ 

.7 

fair 
value

$  6.5
 142.5
  22.1
  22.0
  12.2
14.2
$ 219.5

fair 
value

$ 168.5
4.0
2.9
$ 175.4

The fair value of marketable debt securities that have been in a continuous unrealized loss position for 12 months 
or greater at December 31, 2009 and 2008, were $27.4 and $16.7, and their unrealized losses were $.1 and $.6, 
respectively.

Contractual maturities at December 31, 2009, were as follows:

Maturities: 

Within one year 
One to five years 
Ten or more years 

amortized 
cost 

$  99.7 
104.5 
13.9 
$ 218.1 

fair 
value

$ 100.3
105.3
13.9
$ 219.5

Marketable debt securities included $11.6 and $65.9 of variable-rate demand obligations (VRDOs) at December 31, 
2009 and 2008, respectively. VRDOs are debt instruments with long-term scheduled maturities which have interest 
rates that reset periodically.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
n o t e s   t o   c o n s o l i D a t eD   F i n a n c i a l   s t a t e m e n t s

December  31,  2009,  2008  and  2007  (currencies  in  millions)

c .   i n v e n t o r i e s

Inventories include the following:

At December 31, 

Finished products 
Work in process and raw materials 

Less LIFO reserve 

47

2009 

$  312.5 
487.5 
800.0 
(167.9) 
$  632.1 

2008

$  394.3
421.7
816.0
  (157.9)
$  658.1

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost of inventories in the United States is determined principally 
by the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method. Cost of all other inventories is determined principally by the first-in, first-out 
(FIFO) method. Inventories valued using the LIFO method comprised 58% and 52% of consolidated inventories 
before deducting the LIFO reserve at December 31, 2009 and 2008.

D .   F i n a n c e   a n D   o t h e r   r e c e i va b l e s

Finance and other receivables include the following:

At December 31, 

Loans 
Retail direct financing leases  
Sales-type finance leases 
Dealer wholesale financing 
Interest and other receivables 
Unearned interest: Finance leases 

Less allowance for losses (see Note E)

Loans, leases and other 

  Dealer wholesale 

2009 

$ 2,875.2 
  2,260.0 
764.9 
  1,015.2 
109.6 
(359.6) 
  6,665.3 

(157.1) 
(10.5) 
$ 6,497.7 

2008

$ 3,506.7
  2,558.4
817.9
  1,635.0
127.3
  (430.6)
  8,214.7

  (167.1)
(11.2)
$ 8,036.4

Loans represent fixed- or floating-rate loans to customers collateralized by the vehicles purchased. Retail direct 
financing and sales-type finance leases are contracts that lease equipment to retail customers and dealers, respectively. 
These leases are reported as the sum of minimum lease payments receivable and estimated residual value of the 
property subject to the contracts, reduced by unearned interest on finance leases which is shown separately. Dealer 
wholesale financing represents floating-rate wholesale loans to PACCAR dealers for new and used trucks. The loans 
are collateralized by the trucks being financed. Interest and other receivables are interest due on loans and leases 
and other amounts due in the normal course of business.

PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
n o tE s   t o   c o n s o l i DA t E D  f i nA n c iA l   s t A t E m E n t s

December  31,  2009,  2008  and  2007  (currencies  in  millions)

48

Annual minimum payments due on loans and leases are as follows:

Beginning January 1, 2010 

2010 
2011 
2012 
2013 
2014 
Thereafter 

loans 

$ 1,123.3 
817.1 
525.4 
283.3 
108.0 
18.1 
$ 2,875.2 

finance 
leases 

$  984.7 
792.0 
527.4 
309.8 
141.3 
82.9 
$ 2,838.1 

dealer 
wholesale

$  815.3
199.9

$ 1,015.2

Included in Loans are dealer direct loans on the sale of new trucks of $143.7 and $171.6 as of December 31, 2009 
and 2008. Estimated residual values included with finance leases amounted to $186.8 in 2009 and $190.6 in 2008. 
Repayment experience indicates that some loan and lease receivables will be paid prior to contract maturity, while 
others may be extended or revised. Experience also indicates that the majority of dealer wholesale financing will be 
repaid within one year. Items included in Interest and other receivables are all due within one year. The effects of 
sales-type leases, dealer direct loans and wholesale financing of new trucks are shown in the consolidated statements 
of cash flows as operating activities since they finance the sale of company inventory.

E .   A l l o wA n c E   f o r   l o s s E s

Allowance for losses for loans, leases and other are evaluated together as a group since they relate to a similar 
customer base and their contractual terms require regular payment of principal and interest principally over 36 to 
60 months and they are secured by the same type of collateral. The allowance for credit losses consists of both a 
specific reserve and a general reserve.

Receivables are charged to the allowance for losses when, in the judgment of management, they are considered 
uncollectible (generally upon repossession of the collateral). The provision for losses on finance, trade and other 
receivables is charged to income based on management’s estimate of incurred credit losses, net of recoveries, 
inherent in the portfolio.

The allowance for losses is summarized as follows:

Balance, December 31, 2006 
Provision for losses 
Net charge-offs 
Acquisitions 
Currency translation 
Balance, December 31, 2007 
Provision for losses 
Net charge-offs 
Currency translation 
Balance, December 31, 2008 
Provision for losses 
Net charge-offs 
Currency translation 
Balance, December 31, 2009 

truck 
and other 

$ 

$ 

5.7 
.2 
(.5) 
.2 
1.9 
7.5 
(.3) 
(2.0) 
(.3) 
4.9 
1.1 
(1.8) 
.1 
4.3 

financial 
services

$  169.0
41.0
(25.8)
1.8
7.4
193.4
102.9
  (104.8)
(13.2)
178.3
104.4
(121.8)
6.7
$  167.6

The Company’s customers are principally concentrated in the transportation industry in North America and 
Europe. There are no significant concentrations of credit risk in terms of a single customer. Generally, receivables 
are collateralized by the related equipment and parts.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
n o tE s   t o   c o n s o l i D a tE D  F i n a n c i a l   s t a tE m E n t s

December  31,  2009,  2008  and  2007  (currencies  in  millions)

Impaired finance and other receivables include accounts that may or may not have a specific reserve and certain 
accounts that are placed on non-accrual status. The majority of the loans that have a specific reserve are also on 
non-accrual status.

49

The Company’s Financial Services segment information on impaired finance and other receivables is as follows:

As of and for the Years Ended December 31, 

Finance receivables on non-accrual status 
Impaired receivables with specific reserve  
Impaired receivables with no specific reserve 
Specific loss reserves on impaired receivables 

Average balance of impaired receivables 
Interest recognized on impaired receivables 

$ 

2009 

88.4 
38.3 
29.1 
7.3 

84.9 
4.3 

$ 

2008

59.8
28.5
34.5
4.8

80.0
2.6

The Company repossesses vehicles which serve as collateral for loans and finance leases and records the vehicles as 
used truck inventory included in Financial Services Other Assets on the balance sheet. The Company repossessed 
collateral valued at $203.0 and recorded $106.5 of credit losses upon repossession in 2009. Repossessed assets are 
typically disposed of promptly after repossession with differences between the estimated market value and the 
ultimate sales price resulting in an adjustment to credit losses. The Company sold $213.1 of repossessed assets and 
recorded an additional loss of $10.6 in 2009. As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, a total of $28.5 and $41.9 
respectively, of repossessed assets were held for sale.

F.   E q u i p m E n t   o n   o p E r at i n g   l E a s E s

The Company leases equipment under operating leases to customers in the financial services segment. In addition, 
in the truck segment, equipment sold to customers in Europe subject to a residual value guarantee (RVG) is 
accounted for as operating leases. Equipment is recorded at cost and is depreciated on the straight-line basis to the 
lower of the estimated residual value or guarantee value. Lease and guarantee periods generally range from three to 
seven years. Estimated useful lives of the equipment range from five to eight years. The Company reviews residual 
values of equipment on operating leases periodically to determine that recorded amounts are appropriate.

A summary of equipment on operating leases for the Truck and Other segment and for the Financial Services 
segment is as follows:

At December 31, 

Equipment on operating leases 
Less allowance for depreciation 

truck & other 

financial services

2009 

$ 730.6 
(226.8) 
$ 503.8 

2008 

$ 610.6 
(185.3) 
$ 425.3 

2009 

$ 2,090.8 
(577.6) 
$ 1,513.2 

2008

$ 2,053.4
(518.6)
$ 1,534.8

Annual minimum lease payments due on financial services operating leases beginning January 1, 2010, are $383.0, 
$254.6, $157.0, $79.7, $27.9 and $2.9 thereafter. 

When the equipment is sold subject to an RVG, the full sales price is received from the customer. A liability is 
established for the residual value obligation with the remainder of the proceeds recorded as deferred lease revenue.
These amounts are summarized below: 

At December 31, 

Deferred lease revenues 
Residual value guarantees 
Total 

truck & other

2009 

$  239.2 
308.0 
$  547.2 

2008

$  204.8
266.0
$  470.8

PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
n o t e s   t o   c o n s o l id a t e d   f i n a n c i a l   s t a t e m e n t s

December  31,  2009,  2008  and  2007  (currencies  in  millions)

50

The deferred lease revenue is amortized on a straight-line basis over the RVG contract period. At December 31, 2009, 
the annual amortization of deferred revenues beginning January 1, 2010, is $82.5, $53.4, $39.0, $40.8, $15.6 and 
$7.9 thereafter. Annual maturities of the residual value guarantees beginning January 1, 2010, are $106.3, $68.7, 
$50.1, $52.7, $20.2 and $10.0 thereafter.

g .   p r o p e rt y,   p l a n t   a n d   e q u i p m e n t

Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed principally by the straight-line method 
based on the estimated useful lives of the various classes of assets. Certain production tooling is amortized on a 
unit of production basis. Property, plant and equipment include the following:

At December 31, 

Land 
Buildings and improvements 
Machinery, equipment and production tooling 

Less allowance for depreciation 

useful lives 

 10-40 years 
  3-12 years 

2009 

$  206.3 
  1,007.6 
  2,489.0 
  3,702.9 
 (1,945.2) 
$ 1,757.7 

2008

$  186.8
951.1
  2,355.2
  3,493.1
 (1,710.3)
$ 1,782.8

h .   a c c o u n t s   paya b l e ,   a c c r u e d   e x p e n s e s   a n d   o t h e r

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other include the following:

At December 31, 
Truck and Other:
Accounts payable 
Accrued expenses 
Salaries and wages 
Product support reserves 
Other 

2009 

2008

$  622.5 
226.0 
132.9 
230.8 
277.8 
$ 1,490.0 

$  617.9
388.4
168.7
298.6
318.7
$ 1,792.3

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
n o t e s   t o   c o n s o lI da t e d   fI

n a n cI a l   s t a t e m e n t s

December  31,  2009,  2008  and  2007  (currencies  in  millions)

I .   P r o d u c t   s u P P o rt   l I a b I l I t I e s

51

Product support liabilities include reserves related to product warranties and optional extended warranties and 
repair and maintenance (R&M) contracts. The Company generally offers one‑year warranties covering most of its 
vehicles and related aftermarket parts. Specific terms and conditions vary depending on the product and the country 
of sale. Optional extended warranty and R&M contracts can be purchased for periods which generally range up to 
five years. Warranty expenses and reserves are estimated and recorded at the time products or contracts are sold based 
on historical data regarding the source, frequency and cost of claims, net of any recoveries. PACCAR periodically 
assesses the adequacy of its recorded liabilities and adjusts them as appropriate to reflect actual experience.

Changes in warranty and R&M reserves are summarized as follows:

At December 31, 

Beginning balance 
Cost accruals and revenue deferrals  
Payments and revenue recognized 
Currency translation 

2009 

$ 450.4 
169.0 
(245.6) 
12.6 
$ 386.4 

2008 

$  483.3 
312.3 
  (304.6) 
(40.6) 
$  450.4 

2007

$  458.3
339.2
  (345.1)
30.9
$  483.3

Warranty and R&M reserves are included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as follows:

At December 31, 

Truck and Other:
  Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other 
  Other liabilities 
Financial Services:
  Deferred taxes and other liabilities 

2009 

2008

$  230.8 
84.3 

71.3 
$  386.4 

$  298.6
83.9

67.9
$  450.4

J .   b o r r o w I n g s   a n d   c r e d I t   a r r a n g e m e n t s

Truck and Other long‑term debt at December 31, 2009, consisted of $150.0 of notes bearing interest at 6.9% which 
mature in 2014 and $22.3 of non‑interest bearing notes which mature in 2011. In 2008, long‑term debt consisted of 
non‑interest bearing notes of $19.3. 

Financial Services borrowings include the following:

At December 31, 

Commercial paper 
Bank loans:

Short‑term 
  Medium‑term 

Term notes 

effective 
rate 

2.8% 

7.6% 

4.8% 

2009 

$ 2,695.6 

315.6 
  3,011.2 
  2,889.3 
$ 5,900.5 

2008

$ 3,332.6

50.4
193.2
  3,576.2
  3,889.3
$ 7,465.5

The term notes of $2,889.3 at December 31, 2009, include an increase in fair value of $19.6 for notes designated to 
fair value hedges. The effective rate is the weighted average rate as of December 31, 2009, and includes the effects of 
interest rate contracts. 

PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
n o t e s   t o   c o n s o l i D a t eD   f i n a n c i a l   s t a t e m e n t s

December  31,  2009,  2008  and  2007  (currencies  in  millions)

52

The annual maturities of the financial services borrowings are as follows:

Beginning January 1, 2010 

2010 
2011 
2012 
2013 
2014 

commercial 
paper 

$ 2,695.6 

bank 
loans 

$  95.1 
154.7 
43.2 
22.6 

$ 2,695.6 

$ 315.6 

term 
notes 

$  789.8 
  1,109.9 
  620.0 

350.0 
$ 2,869.7 

total

$ 3,580.5
  1,264.6
  663.2
  22.6
350.0
$ 5,880.9

Interest paid on borrowings was $267.6, $327.1 and $339.0 in 2009, 2008 and 2007. The weighted average interest 
rate on consolidated commercial paper and short-term bank loans was 2.8% and 3.8% at December 31, 2009 and 
2008, respectively.

The primary sources of borrowings are commercial paper and medium-term notes issued in the public markets. 
The medium-term notes are issued by PACCAR Inc, PACCAR Financial Corp. (PFC), PACCAR Financial Europe 
and PACCAR Mexico. 

PACCAR Inc intends to periodically file shelf registrations under the Securities Act of 1933. The total amount of 
medium-term notes outstanding for PACCAR Inc as of December 31, 2009, is $870.0. The current registration 
expires in 2011 and does not limit the principal amount of debt securities that may be issued during the period.

In November 2009, the Company’s U.S. finance subsidiary, PFC, filed a shelf registration under the Securities Act of 
1933. In December 2009, PFC issued $250.0 of fixed rate medium-term notes under this registration. The total 
amount of medium-term notes outstanding for PFC as of December 31, 2009, was $1,148.5. The registration expires 
in 2012 and does not limit the principal amount of debt securities that may be issued during the period. 

At December 31, 2009, PACCAR’s European finance subsidiary, PACCAR Financial Europe, had €850.0 available for 
issuance under a €1,500.0 medium-term note program registered with the London Stock Exchange. The program 
was renewed in the third quarter of 2009 and is renewable annually.

In June 2008, PACCAR Mexico registered a 7,000 peso medium-term note program with the Comision Nacional 
Bancaria y de Valores. The registration expires in 2012 and at December 31, 2009, 6,100 pesos remained available 
for issuance. 

The Company has line of credit arrangements of $3,668.2, of which $3,352.6 was unused at the end of December 
2009. Included in these arrangements is $3,000.0 of syndicated bank facilities. Of the $3,000.0 bank facilities, 
$2,000.0 matures in June 2010 and $1,000.0 matures in June 2012. The Company intends to replace these credit 
facilities as they expire with facilities of similar amounts and duration. These credit facilities are maintained 
primarily to provide backup liquidity for commercial paper borrowings and maturing medium-term notes. There 
were no borrowings under the syndicated bank lines for the year ended December 31, 2009.

  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
n o t e s   t o   c o n s oL i d a t e d   f i n a n c i aL   s t a t e m e n t s

December  31,  2009,  2008  and  2007  (currencies  in  millions)

K .   L e a s e s

53

The Company leases certain facilities, computer equipment and aircraft under operating leases. Leases expire at 
various dates through the year 2017. Annual minimum rent payments under non-cancelable operating leases having 
initial or remaining terms in excess of one year at January 1, 2010, are $27.0, $17.5, $9.7, $6.1, $2.7 and $.5 
thereafter. Total rental expenses under all leases amounted to $40.6, $43.3 and $41.1 for 2009, 2008 and 2007, 
respectively.

L .   c o m m i t m e n t s   a n d   c o n t i n g e n c i e s

The Company is involved in various stages of investigations and cleanup actions in different countries related to 
environmental matters. In certain of these matters, the Company has been designated as a “potentially responsible 
party” by domestic and foreign environmen tal agencies. The Company has an accrual to provide for the estimated 
costs to investigate and complete cleanup actions where it is probable that the Company will incur such costs in the 
future. Expenditures related to environmental activities in 2009, 2008 and 2007 were $1.3, $3.8, and $1.9, respectively.

While the timing and amount of the ultimate costs associated with future environmental cleanup cannot be 
determined, management expects that these matters will not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated 
financial position.

At December 31, 2009, PACCAR had standby letters of credit of $20.5, which guarantee various insurance and 
financing activities. The Company is committed, under specific circumstances, to purchase equipment at a cost of 
$53.4 in 2011. At December 31, 2009, PACCAR’s financial services companies, in the normal course of business, had 
outstanding commitments to fund new loan and lease transactions amounting to $105.3. The commitments 
generally expire in 90 days. At December 31, 2009, the Company had commitments related to the construction of 
its engine facility in Columbus, Mississippi of $11.4 in 2010 and $56.2 thereafter. The Company had other 
commitments, primarily to purchase production inventory, amounting to $113.7 in 2010 and $183.1 thereafter.

PACCAR is a defendant in various legal proceedings and, in addition, there are various other contingent liabilities 
arising in the normal course of business. After consultation with legal counsel, management does not anticipate that 
disposition of these proceedings and contingent liabilities will have a material effect on the consolidated financial 
statements.

m .   e m p L o y e e   b e n e f i t s

Severance Costs: During 2009 and 2008, the Company incurred severance costs as summarized below. These costs 
were the result of work force adjustments reflecting low truck demand, primarily in Europe. 

Truck and Other:
  Cost of sales and revenues 

Sales, general and administrative 

Financial Services:

Sales, general and administrative 

Total Severance Costs 

2009 

$ 19.2 
6.4 
$ 25.6 

.3 
$ 25.9 

2008

$ 13.1
3.4
$ 16.5

.8
$ 17.3

At December 31, 2009, the Company had $3.6 accrued for future severance payments expected in the next year, 
compared to an accrual of $4.6 at December 31, 2008.

PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
n o t e s   t o   c o n s o l i D a t eD   f i n a n c i a l   s t a t e m e n t s

December  31,  2009,  2008  and  2007  (currencies  in  millions)

54

Employee Benefit Plans: PACCAR has several defined benefit pension plans, which cover a majority of its employees. 
The Company evaluates its actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and considers changes based upon market 
conditions and other factors.

The Company funds its pensions in accordance with applicable employee benefit and tax laws. The Company 
contributed $173.4 to its pension plans in 2009 and $63.9 in 2008. The Company expects to contribute in the range 
of $25.0 to $75.0 to its pension plans in 2010 of which $10.3 is estimated to satisfy minimum funding requirements. 
Annual benefits expected to be paid beginning January 1, 2010, are $55.6, $58.8, $64.9, $68.7, $75.8 and for the five 
years thereafter, a total of $433.6.

Plan assets are invested in global equity and debt securities through professional investment managers with the 
objective to achieve targeted risk adjusted returns and maintain liquidity sufficient to fund current benefit payments. 
Typically, each defined benefit plan has an investment policy that includes a target for asset mix including maximum 
and minimum ranges for allocation percentages by investment category. The actual allocation of assets may vary at 
times based upon rebalancing policies and other factors. The Company periodically assesses the target asset mix by 
evaluating external sources of information regarding the long-term historical return, volatilities and expected future 
returns for each investment category. In addition, the long-term rates of return assumptions for pension accounting 
are reviewed annually to ensure they are appropriate. Target asset mix and forecast long-term returns by asset 
category are considered in determining the assumed long-term rates of return, although historical returns realized 
are given some consideration. 

The following information details the allocation of plan assets by investment type. See Note Q for definitions of fair 
value levels.

At December 31, 2009 

Equity Funds:
U.S. equity funds 
Global equity funds 
Total equity funds  

Fixed Income Funds:
U.S. fixed income funds 
Non U.S. fixed income funds 
Total fixed income funds 
Cash and other 
Total plan assets  

target 

level 1 

level 2 

total

$  29.2 

  50-70% 

  29.2 

  30-50% 

  303.2 
13.8 
317.0 
5.6 
$ 351.8 

$ 374.2 
311.4 
 685.6 

 109.3 
102.4 
211.7 
27.2 
$ 924.5 

$  403.4
311.4
 714.8

 412.5
116.2
528.7
32.8
$ 1,276.3

The following additional data relates to all pension plans of the Company, except for certain multi-employer and 
foreign-insured plans:

At December 31, 

Weighted Average Assumptions:
Discount rate 
Rate of increase in future compensation levels 
Assumed long-term rate of return on plan assets 

2009 

5.9% 
3.9% 
7.4% 

2008

6.2%
4.3%
7.4%

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
n o t e s   t o   c o n s o l i D a t eD   f i n a n c i a l   s t a t e m e n t s

December  31,  2009,  2008  and  2007  (currencies  in  millions)

The components of the Change in Projected Benefit Obligation and Change in Plan Assets are as follows:

55

2009 

2008

Change in Projected Benefit Obligation:
Benefit obligation at January 1 
Service cost 
Interest cost 
Benefits paid 
Actuarial loss 
Curtailment gain 
Currency translation 
Participant contributions 
Projected benefit obligation at December 31 

Change in Plan Assets: 
Fair value of plan assets at January 1 
Employer contributions 
Actual return on plan assets 
Benefits paid  
Currency translation 
Participant contributions 
Fair value of plan assets at December 31 
Funded status at December 31 

Amounts Recorded in Balance Sheet: 
Other noncurrent assets 
Other liabilities 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss:
  Actuarial loss 
  Prior service cost 
  Net initial transition amount 

$ 1,196.4 
36.2 
71.1 
(59.6) 
46.7 
(.1) 
31.0 
3.1 
$ 1,324.8 

$  913.8 
173.4 
215.9 
(59.6) 
29.7 
3.1 
1,276.3 
$  (48.5) 

2009 

$ 

59.9 
(108.4) 

291.0 
9.5 
.5 

$ 1,201.0
46.6
73.9
(48.8)
3.0
(3.3)
(80.9)
4.9
$ 1,196.4

$ 1,312.5
63.9
  (336.4)
(48.8)
(82.3)
4.9
913.8
$ (282.6)

2008

$ 
5.5
  (288.1)

334.5
10.1
1.0

Of the December 31, 2009, amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss, $14.8 of unrecognized actuarial loss, 
$1.8 of unrecognized prior service cost and $.1 of unrecognized net initial transition amount are expected to be 
amortized into net pension expense in 2010.

The accumulated benefit obligation for all pension plans of the Company, except for certain multi-employer and 
foreign-insured plans was $1,214.0 at December 31, 2009, and $1,037.6 at December 31, 2008. 

Information for all plans with accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets is as follows:

At December 31, 

Projected benefit obligation 
Accumulated benefit obligation 
Fair value of plan assets 

2009 

$  429.0 
418.9 
322.9 

2008

$  933.7
791.9
650.9

PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
n o t e s   t o   c o n s o l i D a t eD   f i n a n c i a l   s t a t e m e n t s

December  31,  2009,  2008  and  2007  (currencies  in  millions)

56

Year Ended December 31, 

2009 

2008 

2007

Components of Pension Expense:
Service cost 
Interest on projected benefit obligation  
Expected return on assets 
Amortization of prior service costs  
Recognized actuarial loss  
Curtailment (gain) loss 
Net pension expense 

$ 36.2 
71.1 
(93.1) 
1.7 
9.5 
(.1) 
$ 25.3 

$ 46.6 
73.9 
(92.8) 
2.4 
3.0 
.9 
$ 34.0 

$  49.7
68.7
(89.7)
2.9
8.4
2.7
$  42.7

Pension expense for multi-employer and foreign-insured plans was $41.2, $45.8 and $37.9 in 2009, 2008 and 2007.

The Company has certain defined contribution benefit plans whereby it generally matches employee contributions 
up to 5% of base wages. In 2009, the Company match was 1% of base wages and 5% in 2008 and 2007. The majority 
of participants in these plans are non-union employees located in the United States. Expenses for these plans were 
$6.8, $22.1 and $22.6 in 2009, 2008 and 2007.

During the second quarter of 2009, the Company discontinued subsidizing postretirement medical costs for the 
majority of its U.S. employees and recognized a curtailment gain of $47.7. The Company also recognized a 
curtailment gain of $18.3 in the third quarter for the discontinuation of postretirement healthcare related to the 
permanent closure of the Peterbilt facility in Madison, Tennessee. 

The following data relates to unfunded postretirement medical and life insurance plans:

Change in Projected Benefit Obligation:
Benefit obligation at January 1 
Service cost 
Interest cost 
Benefits paid 
Curtailment gain 
Actuarial gain 
Projected benefit obligation at December 31 
Unfunded Status at December 31 

Amounts Recorded in Balance Sheet:
Other liabilities 
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss:
  Actuarial (gain) loss 
  Prior service cost 
  Net initial transition amount 

Year Ended December 31, 

Components of Retiree Expense:
Service cost 
Interest cost 
Recognized actuarial loss 
Recognized prior service cost 
Curtailment gain 
Recognized net initial obligation 
Net retiree (income) expense 

2009 

2008

$ 80.9 

.5 
(3.2) 
(66.0) 
(5.5) 
6.7 
$ (6.7) 

$  88.0
3.2
4.7
(4.1)

(10.9)
80.9
$ (80.9)

$ (6.7) 

$ (80.9)

(.9) 

2009 

2008 

$ 

.5 

(66.0) 

$ (65.5) 

$  3.2 
  4.7 

.1 

.4 
$  8.4 

1.8
.1
.8

2007

$  4.8
  5.2
.9
.1

.4
$  11.4

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
n o t e s   t o   c o n s o l i D a t eD   f i n a n c i a l   s t a t e m e n t s

December  31,  2009,  2008  and  2007  (currencies  in  millions)

n .   i n c o m e   ta x e s

57

The Company’s tax rate is based on income and statutory tax rates in the various jurisdictions in which the Company 
operates. Tax law requires items to be included in the Company’s tax returns at different times than the items 
reflected in the Company’s financial statements. As a result, the Company’s annual tax rate reflected in its financial 
statements is different than that reported in its tax returns. Some of these differences are permanent, such as expenses 
that are not deductible in the Company’s tax return, and some differences reverse over time, such as depreciation 
expense. These temporary differences create deferred tax assets and liabilities. The Company establishes valuation 
allowances for its deferred tax assets if, based on the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some portion 
or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. 

The components of the Company’s income before income taxes include the following:

Year Ended December 31, 

Domestic 
Foreign 

2009 

$  79.1 
95.9 
$ 175.0 

2008 

$ 
96.0 
  1,368.0 
$ 1,464.0 

2007

$  419.1
  1,345.2
$ 1,764.3

The components of the Company’s provision for income taxes include the following:

Year Ended December 31, 

Current provision (benefit):

Federal 
State 
Foreign 

Deferred provision (benefit):

Federal 
State 
Foreign 

2009 

2008 

2007

$ (102.4) 
(2.5) 
8.3 
(96.6) 

125.4 
8.2 
26.1 
159.7 
$  63.1 

$  (24.7) 
(7.9) 
347.7 
315.1 

123.7 
12.5 
(5.2) 
131.0 
$  446.1 

$  120.5
11.1
367.1
498.7

41.9
3.6
(7.2)
38.3
$  537.0

Tax benefits recognized for net operating loss carryforwards were $27.8, $4.7 and $21.2 for the years ended 2009, 
2008 and 2007. Tax expense for the year ended December 31, 2009, includes a charge of $11.4 resulting from the 
retroactive effects of a Mexican tax law enacted in December 2009.  

A reconciliation of the statutory U.S federal tax rate to the effective income tax rate is as follows:

Statutory rate  
Effect of:
  Mexican tax law change  
  Qualified dividends to defined contribution plan 
  Research and development credit  
  Tax on foreign earnings 
  Tax contingencies 
  Other, net 

2009 

35.0% 

6.5 
(2.3) 
(2.1) 
.8 
2.2 
(4.0) 
  36.1% 

2008 

35.0% 

2007

  35.0 %

(.4) 
(.4) 
(4.6) 
(.3) 
1.2 
30.5% 

(.7)
(.3)
(4.1)
(.1)
.6
  30.4%

PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
n o t e s   t o   c o n s o l i D a t eD   f i n a n c i a l   s t a t e m e n t s

December  31,  2009,  2008  and  2007  (currencies  in  millions)

58

U.S. income taxes are not provided on the undistributed earnings of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries that are 
considered to be indefinitely reinvested. At December 31, 2009, the amount of undistributed earnings which are 
considered to be indefinitely reinvested is $3,117.8.

At December 31, 2009, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of $365.7, of which $209.0 were in 
foreign subsidiaries and $156.7 were in the U.S. The related deferred tax asset was $70.9. The carryforward periods 
range from five years to indefinite, subject to certain limitations under applicable laws. At December 31, 2009, the 
Company has U.S. tax credit carryforwards of $68.4, most of which expire in 2018 and 2019. The future tax benefits 
of net operating loss and credit carryforwards are evaluated on a regular basis, including a review of historical and 
projected operating results.

The tax effects of temporary differences representing deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

At December 31, 

Assets:
  Accrued expenses 
  Net operating loss carryforwards 
  Tax credit carryforwards 
  Allowance for losses on receivables 
  Postretirement benefit plans 
  Other 

  Valuation allowance 

Liabilities:

Financial Services leasing depreciation 

  Depreciation and amortization 
  Other 

Net deferred tax liability 

2009 

2008

$  123.2 
70.9 
68.4 
54.4 
  15.6 
98.7 
431.2 
(4.0) 
427.2 

(524.1) 
(167.9) 
(16.9) 
(708.9) 
$ (281.7) 

$ 156.4
54.0

58.0
 124.3
152.1
544.8
(5.4)
539.4

(524.1)
(116.4)
(55.1)
(695.6)
$ (156.2)

The balance sheet classification of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

At December 31, 

Truck and Other:
  Other current assets 
  Other noncurrent assets 
  Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other 
  Other liabilities 
Financial Services:
  Other assets 
  Deferred taxes and other liabilities 
Net deferred tax liability 

2009 

2008

$  76.9 
135.8 
(.1) 
(35.0) 

68.0 
(527.3) 
$ (281.7) 

$  83.5
195.3
(13.3)
(13.1)

56.4
(465.0)
$ (156.2)

Cash paid for income taxes was $67.3, $452.0 and $412.9 in 2009, 2008 and 2007.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
n o t eS   t o   c o nS o l id a t e d   f i n a n c i a l  S t a t e m e n tS

December  31,  2009,  2008  and  2007  (currencies  in  millions)

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

59

Balance at January 1 
  Additions based on tax positions and settlements 

  related to the current year 

  Additions based on tax positions and settlements 

  related to the prior year 

  Reductions for tax positions of prior years 

Lapse of statute of limitations 

2009 

$  37.1 

2008 

$  57.9 

1.1 

14.9 
(6.5) 
(2.5) 

7.1 

2.6 
(20.7) 
(9.8) 

2007

$  54.3

11.4

8.7
(11.6)
(4.9)

Balance at December 31 

$  44.1 

$  37.1 

$  57.9

The Company had $21.8 and $15.3 of related assets at December 31, 2009 and 2008. All of the unrecognized tax 
benefits and related assets would impact the effective tax rate if recognized. Based on the resolution of certain tax 
examinations in January 2010, the Company anticipates a decrease of $11.3 to its unrecognized tax benefits during 
the first quarter of 2010.

Interest and penalties are classified as income taxes in the accompanying statements of income and were not 
significant during any of the three years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007. Amounts accrued for the 
payment of penalties and interest at December 31, 2009 and 2008 were also not significant.

As of December 31, 2009, the United States Internal Revenue Service has completed examinations of the Company’s 
tax returns for all years through 2004. The Company’s tax returns for other major jurisdictions remain potentially 
subject to examination for the years ranging from 2003 through 2009.

o .   S t o c k h o l d e r S ’   e q u i t y

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss): Following are the components of accumulated other 
comprehensive income:

At December 31, 

Unrealized gain on investments 
Tax effect  

Unrealized loss on derivative contracts 
Tax effect 

Pension and postretirement:
  Unrecognized:
  Actuarial loss 
  Prior service cost 
  Net initial obligation 

  Tax effect 

Currency translation adjustment 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) 

$ 

2009 

1.4 
(.5) 
.9 

(73.4) 
25.0 
(48.4) 

(444.7) 
(14.7) 
(.6) 
159.9 
(300.1) 

383.8 

$  36.2 

$ 

2008 

1.0 
(.4) 
.6 

(121.7) 
39.4 
(82.3) 

  (525.9) 
(16.0) 
(2.3) 
195.9 
  (348.3) 

160.2 

$ (269.8) 

2007

$  3.2

(1.3) 
1.9

(18.8)
10.6
(8.2)

(131.6)
(20.0)
(3.5)
53.3
(101.8)

516.2

$ 408.1

Other Capital Stock Changes: PACCAR had 409,000 treasury shares at December 31, 2009, and 2008, and 1,278,900 
treasury shares at December 31, 2007.

Stock Dividend: A 50% common stock dividend was paid in October 2007. This resulted in the issuance of 
122,775,211 additional shares and 613 fractional shares paid in cash. 

PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
n o t e s   t o   c o n s o l i D a t eD   f i n a n c i a l   s t a t e m e n t s

December  31,  2009,  2008  and  2007  (currencies  in  millions)

60

P.   D e r i vat i v e   f i n a n c i a l   i n s t r u m e n t s

Derivative financial instruments are used to hedge exposures to fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency 
exchange rates. Certain derivative instruments designated as either cash flow hedges or fair value hedges are subject 
to hedge accounting. Derivative instruments that are not subject to hedge accounting are held as economic hedges. 
The Company’s policies prohibit the use of derivatives for speculation or trading. At inception of each hedge 
relationship, the Company documents its risk management objectives, procedures and accounting treatment. 
Exposure limits and minimum credit ratings are used to minimize the risks of counterparty default. The Company 
had no material exposures to default at December 31, 2009.

Interest-Rate Contracts: The Company enters into various interest-rate contracts, including interest-rate swaps and 
cross currency interest-rate swaps. Interest-rate swaps involve the exchange of fixed for floating rate or floating for 
fixed rate interest payments based on the contractual notional amounts in a single currency. Cross currency 
interest-rate swaps involve the exchange of notional amounts and interest payments in different currencies. These 
contracts are used to manage exposures to fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. Net 
amounts paid or received are reflected as adjustments to interest expense. 

At December 31, 2009, the notional amount of the Company’s interest-rate contracts was $3,541.2. Notional 
maturities for all interest-rate contracts are $1,396.0 for 2010, $1,148.9 for 2011, $826.5 for 2012, $29.3 for 2013 
and $140.5 for 2014. The majority of these contracts are floating to fixed swaps that effectively convert an 
equivalent amount of commercial paper and other variable rate debt to fixed rates. 

Foreign-Exchange Contracts: The Company enters into foreign-exchange contracts to hedge certain anticipated 
transactions and assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, particularly the Canadian dollar, the euro, 
the British pound, the Australian dollar and the Mexican peso. At December 31, 2009, the notional amount of the 
outstanding foreign-exchange contracts was $155.1. Foreign-exchange contracts mature within one year.

The following table presents the balance sheet locations and fair value of derivative financial instruments:

At December 31, 2009 
Derivatives designated under hedge accounting: 
Interest-rate contracts:
Financial Services: 
  Other assets 
  Deferred taxes and other liabilities 

Foreign-exchange contracts:
  Truck and Other: 

  Deferred taxes and other current assets 
  Accounts payable and accrued expenses 

Total 

Economic hedges: 
Interest-rate contracts:
Financial Services: 
  Other assets 
  Deferred taxes and other liabilities 

Foreign-exchange contracts:
  Truck and Other: 

  Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other 
Financial Services: 
  Other assets 
  Deferred taxes and other liabilities 

Total 

assets 

liabilities

$ 10.8 

.1 

$ 10.9 

$ 

.4 

.3 

$ 

.7 

$ 107.1

.2
$ 107.3

$  9.0

.2

.1
$  9.3

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
n o t e s   t o   c o n s o l i D a t eD   f i n a n c i a l   s t a t e m e n t s

December  31,  2009,  2008  and  2007  (currencies  in  millions)

Substantially all of the Company’s interest-rate contracts and some foreign-exchange contracts have been designated 
as cash flow hedges. The Company uses regression analysis to assess and measure effectiveness of interest-rate 
contracts. For foreign-exchange contracts, the Company performs quarterly assessments to ensure that critical terms 
continue to match. Gains or losses on the ineffective portion of cash flow hedges are recognized currently in 
earnings and were immaterial for 2009. Hedge accounting is discontinued prospectively when the Company 
determines that a derivative financial instrument has ceased to be a highly effective hedge. 

61

Fair Value Hedges: Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as fair value hedges are recorded in earnings 
together with the changes in fair value of the hedged item attributable to the risk being hedged. In 2009, the 
Company recognized income of $3.6 on interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges which was offset by $3.9 
of expense on the fixed-rate term notes being hedged. Both the income and expense were recorded in the Financial 
Services segment in Interest and other borrowing expenses.

Cash Flow Hedges: Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges are recorded in 
accumulated other comprehensive income to the extent such hedges are considered effective. Amounts in 
accumulated other comprehensive income are reclassified into net income in the same period in which the hedged 
transaction affects earnings. Net realized gains and losses from interest-rate contracts are recognized as an 
adjustment to interest expense. Net realized gains and losses from foreign-exchange contracts are recognized as an 
adjustment to cost of sales or to financial services interest expense, consistent with the hedged transaction. 

The following table presents the pre-tax effects of derivative instruments recognized in earnings and Other 
Comprehensive Income (OCI):

Year Ended December 31, 2009 
(Gain) loss recognized in OCI: 
  Truck and Other 
Financial Services 

Total 

(Income) expense reclassified from Accumulated OCI into income:

  Truck and Other: 

  Cost of sales and revenues 
  Interest and other expense (income), net 
Financial Services: 
  Interest and other borrowing expenses 

Total 

interest-rate 
contracts 

$  72.0 
$  72.0 

foreign- 
exchange
contracts

$  (.6)
.2
$  (.4)

$ (10.0)
  (1.7) 

.2
$ (11.5)

$ 131.4 
$ 131.4 

Of the $48.4 accumulated net loss on derivative contracts included in accumulated other comprehensive income as 
of December 31, 2009, $39.3, net of taxes, is expected to be reclassified to interest expense or cost of sales in the 
following 12 months. The fixed interest earned on finance receivables will offset the amount recognized in interest 
expense, resulting in a stable interest margin consistent with the Company’s risk management strategy. 

PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
n o t e s   t o   c o n s o l i D a t eD   f i n a n c i a l   s t a t e m e n t s

December  31,  2009,  2008  and  2007  (currencies  in  millions)

62

Economic Hedges: Changes in the fair value of economic hedges are recorded in earnings in the period in which the 
change occurs.

The (income) or expense recognized in earnings related to economic hedges is as follows: 

Year Ended December 31, 2009 
  Truck and Other: 

  Cost of sales and revenues 
  Interest and other expense (income), net 
Financial Services: 
  Interest and other borrowing expenses 

Total 

q .   fa i r   va l u e   m e a s u r e m e n t s

interest-rate 
contracts 

foreign 
exchange
contracts

$  6.1 

  4.0 
$ 10.1 

$ (14.4)
  18.3 

  2.3
$  6.2

Fair value represents the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly 
transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The hierarchy of fair value measurements is 
described below.

Level 1 – Valuations are based on quoted prices that the Company has the ability to obtain in actively traded 
markets for identical assets or liabilities. Since valuations are based on quoted prices that are readily and 
regularly available in an active market or exchange traded market, valuation of these instruments does not 
require a significant degree of judgment.

Level 2 – Valuations are based on quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for 
identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which 
all significant assumptions are observable in the market.

Level 3 – Valuations are based on model-based techniques for which some or all of the assumptions are obtained 
from indirect market information that is significant to the overall fair value measurement and which require a 
significant degree of management judgment. The Company has no financial instruments requiring Level 3 
valuation. 

The Company uses the following methods and assumptions to measure fair value for assets and liabilities subject to 
recurring fair value measurements.

Marketable Securities: The Company’s marketable debt securities consist of municipal bonds, government 
obligations and investment-grade corporate bonds. The fair value of government obligations is based on quoted 
prices in active markets. These are categorized as Level 1. The fair value of municipal bonds and corporate bonds 
are estimated using recent transactions, market price quotations and pricing models that consider, where applicable, 
interest rates and other observable market information. These bonds are categorized as Level 2. 

Derivative Financial Instruments: The Company’s derivative contracts consist of interest rate contracts and foreign 
currency exchange contracts. These derivative contracts are over the counter and their fair value is determined using 
modeling techniques that include market inputs such as interest rates, yield curves and currency exchange rates. 
These contracts are categorized as Level 2. A portion of the Company’s fixed-rate term notes has been converted to 
variable-rate term notes using fair value hedges for interest-rate risk. Fair value is determined using modeling 
techniques that include market inputs for interest rates. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
n o t e s   t o   c o n s o l i D a t eD   f i n a n c i a l   s t a t e m e n t s

December  31,  2009,  2008  and  2007  (currencies  in  millions)

PACCAR’s assets and liabilities subject to recurring fair value measurements, are either Level 1 or Level 2 as follows: 

63

At December 31, 2009 
Assets:
Marketable debt securities 
Derivative contracts 
Liabilities: 
Derivative contracts 

At December 31, 2008 
Assets:
Marketable debt securities 
Derivative contracts 
Liabilities: 
Derivative contracts 

level 1 

level 2 

$ 6.5 

$ 213.0 
11.6 

116.6 

level 1 

level 2 

$ 6.9 

$ 168.5 
60.4 

173.0 

Other nonfinancial assets that are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are as follows:

At December 31, 

Used trucks held for sale:
  Truck and Other 
Financial Services 

2009 

level 2 

$  28.1 
124.7 
$ 152.8 

total

$ 219.5
11.6

116.6

total

$ 175.4
60.4

173.0

2008

level 2

$  27.9
96.6
$ 124.5

The carrying amount of used trucks held for sale is written down when appropriate to reflect their fair value. The 
fair value of used trucks is determined based on management’s evaluation of factors such as recent sales prices of 
comparable units, the condition of the vehicles and the number of similar units to be sold. Used truck write-downs 
during 2009 were $34.7. Of the $34.7 recorded in 2009, $18.0 was recorded in cost of sales in the truck segment and 
$16.7 was recorded in the financial services segment (credit losses of $4.7 and depreciation and other expense of 
$12.0). The amount of used truck write-downs was $23.5 for the year ended December 31, 2008 of which $12.1 was 
recorded in cost of sales in the truck segment and $11.4 was recorded in the financial services segment (credit losses 
of $9.2 and depreciation and other expense of $2.2).

The Company used the following methods and assumptions to determine the fair value of financial instruments 
that are not recognized at fair value as described below. 

Cash and Cash Equivalents: Carrying amounts approximate fair value.

Financial Services Net Receivables: For floating-rate loans, wholesale financings, and interest and other receivables, 
fair values approximate carrying values. For fixed-rate loans, fair values are estimated using discounted cash flow 
analysis based on current rates for comparable loans. Finance lease receivables and related loss provisions have been 
excluded from the accompanying table.

Debt: The carrying amounts of financial services commercial paper, variable-rate bank loans and variable-rate term 
notes approximate fair value. For fixed-rate debt, fair values are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based 
on current rates for comparable debt.

Trade Receivables and Payables: Carrying amounts approximate fair value.

PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
n o t e s   t o   c o n s o l i D a t eD   f i n a n c i a l   s t a t e m e n t s

December  31,  2009,  2008  and  2007  (currencies  in  millions)

64

Fixed-rate loans that are not carried at approximate fair value are as follows:

At December 31, 

Assets:
Financial Services fixed-rate loans 

Liabilities: 
Truck and Other fixed-rate debt 
Financial Services fixed-rate debt 

r .   s t o c k   c o m p e n s at i o n   p l a n s

2009 

2008

carrying 
amount 

fair 
value 

carrying 
amount 

fair 
value

$ 2,491.1 

$ 2,539.0 

$ 3,011.1 

$ 3,030.8

  172.3 
  1,645.4 

  192.4 
1,746.7 

19.3 
752.7 

18.6
788.1

PACCAR has certain plans under which officers and key employees may be granted options to purchase shares of 
the Company’s authorized but unissued common stock. Non-employee directors and certain officers may be 
granted restricted shares of the Company’s common stock. The maximum number of shares of the Company’s 
common stock authorized for issuance under these plans is 46.7 million, and as of December 31, 2009, the 
maximum number of shares available for future grants was 17.7 million. Options outstanding under these plans 
were granted with exercise prices equal to the fair market value of the Company’s common stock at the date of 
grant. Options expire no later than ten years from the grant date and generally vest within three years. Stock option 
activity is summarized below:

Outstanding at 12/31/06 
  Granted  
  Exercised 
  Cancelled 
Outstanding at 12/31/07 
  Granted  
  Exercised 
  Cancelled 
Outstanding at 12/31/08 
  Granted  
  Exercised 
  Cancelled 
Outstanding at 12/31/09 

*Weighted Average

number 
of shares 
6,162,000 
824,200 
(1,168,200) 
(109,000) 
5,709,000 
734,300 
(403,000) 
(241,000) 
5,799,300 
1,182,800 
(1,181,900) 
(232,500) 
5,567,700 

exercise
price*
$  19.50
44.56
14.79
34.80
23.79
45.74
16.95
39.50
26.39
30.81
14.99
41.36
$  29.12

For options exercised, the aggregate difference between the market price and strike price on the date of exercise was 
$22.7 in 2009, $10.8 in 2008 and $40.4 in 2007. 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
n o t e s   t o   c o n s o l i D a t eD   f i n a n c i a l   s t a t e m e n t s

December  31,  2009,  2008  and  2007  (currencies  in  millions)

The following tables summarize information about options outstanding at December 31, 2009: 

65

 range of exercise prices 
Exercisable: 
$ 8.25-10.20 
  12.54-13.96 
25.31 
  32.11-32.23 

Not Exercisable:

44.56 
45.74 
30.81 

*Weighted Average

number 
of shares 

remaining 
contractual 
life in years 

average
exercise
price*

  464,600 
  958,300 
 437,800 
  1,340,700 
  3,201,400 

624,400 
601,700 
  1,140,200 
  2,366,300 
  5,567,700 

1.1 
2.6 
4.0 
5.6 
3.8 

7.1 
8.1 
9.1 
8.3 
5.7 

$ 10.16
13.28
25.31
32.17
22.39

44.56
45.74
30.81
38.23
$ 29.12

The fair value of restricted stock awards was determined based on the stock price at the award date. Certain 
restricted stock awards granted in 2008 and 2007 contain conditions tied to the Company’s performance over a five 
year period. Compensation expense for awards with performance conditions is recorded only when it is probable 
that the requirements will be achieved. Compensation expense related to restricted stock awards with only service 
conditions is recognized over the requisite service period.

Realized tax benefits for 2009 of $7.1 and 2008 of $3.7 related to the excess of deductible amounts over compensation 
costs recognized have been classified as a financing cash flow. Stock based compensation expense was $9.5, $10.2 and 
$12.3 in 2009, 2008 and 2007 respectively. As of December 31, 2009, there was $7.7 of unrecognized compensation 
cost related to unvested stock options, which is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average 
vesting period of 1.7 years. Unrecognized compensation cost at December 31, 2009, related to unvested restricted 
stock awards of $1.0 is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted-average vesting period of 2.2 years. 

The estimated fair value of stock options granted during 2009, 2008 and 2007 was $8.47, $8.58 and $10.10 per share. 
These amounts were determined using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model, which values options based 
on the stock price at the grant date and the following assumptions:

Risk-free interest rate  
Expected volatility  
Expected dividend yield  
Expected term  

2009 

2.00% 
39% 
3.0% 
5 years 

2008 

2.86% 
29% 
4.0% 
5 years 

2007

4.80%
30%
4.0%
5 years

PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
n o t e s   t o   c o n s o l i D a t eD   f i n a n c i a l   s t a t e m e n t s

December  31,  2009,  2008  and  2007  (currencies  in  millions)

66

s .   s e g m e n t   a n D   r e l at e D   i n f o r m at i o n

PACCAR operates in two principal segments, Truck and Financial Services.

The Truck segment includes the manufacture of trucks and the distribution of related aftermarket parts, both of 
which are sold through a network of independent dealers. This segment derives a large proportion of its revenues 
and operating profits from operations in North America and Europe.

The Financial Services segment is composed of finance and leasing products and services provided to truck 
customers and dealers. Revenues are primarily generated from operations in North America and Europe.

Included in All Other is PACCAR’s industrial winch manufacturing business. Also within this category are other 
sales, income and expenses not attributable to a reportable segment, including a portion of corporate expense. 
Intercompany interest income on cash advances to the financial services companies is included in All Other and was 
nil, $17.2 and $24.9 for 2009, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Included in All Other income before income taxes of 
$42.2 in 2009 was $66.0 of curtailment gains and $22.2 of expense related to economic hedges. Geographic revenues 
from external customers are presented based on the country of the customer.

PACCAR evaluates the performance of its Truck segment based on operating profits, which excludes investment 
income, other income and expense and income taxes. The Financial Services segment’s performance is evaluated 
based on income before income taxes.

Geographic Area Data 

Revenues:
  United States 
  Europe 
  Other 

Property, plant and equipment, net:
  United States 
  The Netherlands 
  Other 

Equipment on operating leases, net:
  United States 
  Germany 
  United Kingdom 
  Mexico 
  Other 

Business Segment Data 

Net sales and revenues:
  Truck

  Total 
  Less intersegment 

Net Truck 
All Other  
Truck and Other 
Financial Services 

2009 

2008 

2007

$ 3,594.4 
  2,828.3 
  1,663.8 
$ 8,086.5 

$  814.6 
452.8 
490.3 
$ 1,757.7 

$  686.6 
362.7 
349.7 
186.7 
431.3 
$ 2,017.0 

$  4,765.6 
  7,023.4 
  3,183.5 
$ 14,972.5 

$ 

820.7 
467.3 
494.8 
$  1,782.8 

$ 

634.9 
358.4 
290.9 
212.4 
463.5 
$  1,960.1 

$  5,517.5
  6,159.6
  3,544.6
$ 15,221.7

$ 

621.1
480.7
540.8
$  1,642.6

$ 

464.4
243.3
342.8
186.6
570.8
$  1,807.9

2009 

2008 

2007

$ 7,388.6 
(394.6) 
  6,994.0 
82.7 
  7,076.7 
  1,009.8 
$ 8,086.5 

$ 14,142.7 
  (595.3) 
 13,547.4 
162.2 
 13,709.6 
  1,262.9 
$ 14,972.5 

$ 14,295.7
  (441.4)
 13,854.3
176.1
 14,030.4
  1,191.3
$ 15,221.7

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
n o t e s   t o   c o n s o l i D a t eD   f i n a n c i a l   s t a t e m e n t s

December  31,  2009,  2008  and  2007  (currencies  in  millions)

Business Segment Data 

Income before income taxes:
  Truck 
  All Other 

Financial Services 
Investment income 

Depreciation and amortization:
  Truck 

Financial Services 

  All Other 

Expenditures for long-lived assets:
  Truck 

Financial Services 

  All Other 

Segment assets:
  Truck 
  Other  
  Cash and marketable securities  

Financial Services 

2009 

25.9 
42.2 
68.1 
84.6 
22.3 
175.0 

277.2 
350.8 
10.1 
638.1 

324.2 
646.0 
.8 
971.0 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$ 

$  3,849.1 
232.6 
  2,056.0 
  6,137.7 
  8,431.3 
$ 14,569.0 

2008 

2007

67 

$  1,156.5 
6.0 
  1,162.5 
216.9 
84.6 
$  1,464.0 

$ 

$ 

309.0 
329.4 
11.0 
649.4 

$ 

671.6 
859.4 
19.0 
$  1,550.0 

$  3,939.3 
205.5 
  2,074.6 
  6,219.4 
 10,030.4 
$ 16,249.8 

$  1,352.8
32.0
  1,384.8
284.1
95.4
$  1,764.3

$ 

$ 

261.4
252.7
 12.3
526.4

$ 

562.3
671.7
33.4
$  1,267.4

$  3,846.7
238.2
  2,515.0
  6,599.9
 10,710.3
$ 17,310.2

PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
M a n a g eM e n t ’ s   r e p o r t   o n   i n t e r n a l   c o n t r o l   o v e r 
f i n a n c i a l   r e p o r t i n g

68

The management of PACCAR Inc (the Company) is responsible for establishing and maintaining satisfactory internal 
control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable 
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external 
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements because of its inherent 

limitations. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may 
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and 
procedures may deteriorate.
  Management assessed the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on 
criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in Internal Control—Integrated Framework 
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, we 
concluded that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009.
  Ernst & Young LLP, the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm that audited the financial statements 
included in this Annual Report, has issued an attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial 
reporting. The attestation report is included on page 69.

Mark C. Pigott
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

r e p o r t   o f   i n d e p e n d e n t   r e g i s t e r e d   p u b l i c   a c c o u n t i n g   f i rM 
o n   t h e   c oM p a n y ’ s   c o n s o l i d a t e d   f i n a n c i a l   s t a t eM e n t s

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of PACCAR Inc

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of PACCAR Inc as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, 
and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for 
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the 
Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
  We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board 
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about 
whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, 
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the 
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall 
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated 
financial position of PACCAR Inc at December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the consolidated results of its operations and 
its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally 
accepted accounting principles.
  We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board 
(United States), PACCAR Inc’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria 
established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the 
Treadway Commission and our report dated February 26, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

Seattle, Washington
February 26, 2010

 
 
 
 
 
r e p o r t   o f   i n d e p e n d e n t   r e g i s t e r e d   p u b l i c   a c c o u n t i n g 
f i r m   o n   t h e   c o m p a n y ’ s   i n t e r n a l   c o n t r o l s

The Board of Directors and Stockholders of PACCAR Inc

69

We have audited PACCAR Inc’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on criteria 
established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of 
the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). PACCAR Inc’s management is responsible for maintaining effective 
internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial 
reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our 
responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. 
  We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board 
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about 
whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit 
included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material 
weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the 
assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe 
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
  A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance 
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in 
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting 
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, 
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable 
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance 
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made 
only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable 
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s 
assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
  Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect 
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that 
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the 
policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, PACCAR Inc maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial 

reporting as of December 31, 2009, based on the COSO criteria.
  We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board 
(United States), the consolidated balance sheets of PACCAR Inc as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and the related 
consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity, cash flows for each of the three 
years in the period ended December 31, 2009 and our report dated February 26, 2010 expressed an unqualified 
opinion thereon.

Seattle, Washington
February 26, 2010

PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries

 
s e l e c t e d   f i n a n c i a l   d a t a

70

2009 

2008 

2007 

2006 

2005

Truck and Other Net Sales  

  and Revenues 

Financial Services Revenues 

$  7,076.7 

  1,009.8 

$ 13,709.6 

  1,262.9 

$ 14,030.4 

  1,191.3 

$ 15,503.3 

$ 13,298.4

950.8 

759.0

Total Revenues 

$  8,086.5 

$ 14,972.5 

$ 15,221.7 

$16,454.1 

$ 14,057.4

(millions except per share data)

Net Income 

Net Income Per Share:

  Basic 

  Diluted  

Cash Dividends Declared Per Share 

Total Assets:

  Truck and Other  

  Financial Services 

Truck and Other Long-Term Debt 

Financial Services Debt 

Stockholders’ Equity 

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges 

$ 

111.9 

$  1,017.9 

$  1,227.3 

$  1,496.0 

$  1,133.2

.31 

.31 

.54 

6,137.7 

8,431.3 

172.3 

5,900.5 

5,103.7 

1.57x 

2.79 

2.78 

.82 

  6,219.4 

  10,030.4 

19.3 

  7,465.5 

  4,846.7 

4.58x 

3.31 

3.29 

1.65 

  6,599.9 

  10,710.3 

23.6 

  7,852.2 

  5,013.1 

5.36x 

3.99 

3.97 

1.84 

  6,296.2 

  9,811.2 

20.2 

  7,259.8 

  4,456.2 

7.78x 

2.93

2.92

1.28

  5,359.5

  8,355.9

20.2

  6,226.1

  3,901.1

9.62x

c o m m o n   s t o c k   m a r k e t   p r i c e s   a n d   d i v i d e n d s

Common stock of the Company is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol PCAR. The table  
be low reflects the range of trading prices as reported by The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC, and cash dividends declared. 
There were 2,273 record holders of the common stock at December 31, 2009.

2009 

2008

stock price 

stock price

quarter 
First 
Second 
Third 
Fourth 
Year-End Extra 

dividends 
declared 
$  .18 
 .18 
 .09 
 .09 

high 
$32.04 
35.83 
39.74 
39.68 

low 
$20.89 
26.14 
29.13 
35.31 

dividends 
declared 
$  .18 
.18 
.18 
.18 
.10 

high 
$55.54 
53.81 
45.95 
37.99 

low
$41.14
41.36
36.22
21.96

The Company expects to continue paying regular cash dividends, although there is no assurance as to future 
dividends because they are dependent upon future earnings, capital requirements and financial conditions.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
q u a r t e r l y   r e s u l t s   ( u n a u d i t e d )

first 

second 

third 

quarter

(millions  except  per  share  data)

fourth

71

2009
Truck and Other:

  Net sales and revenues 

  Cost of sales and revenues 

  Research and development 

Financial Services:

  Revenues 

Interest and other borrowing expenses 

  Depreciation and other 

Net Income  

Net Income Per Share (1):
  Basic 
  Diluted 

2008
Truck and Other:

  Net sales and revenues 

  Cost of sales and revenues 

  Research and development 

Financial Services:

  Revenues 

Interest and other borrowing expenses 

  Depreciation and other 

Net Income  

Net Income Per Share (1):
  Basic 
  Diluted 

$1,730.4 

$1,602.3 

$1,758.5 

$1,985.5

1,561.1 

1,492.8 

1,646.5 

1,783.0

52.3 

52.8 

43.4 

50.7

255.8 

91.3 

102.9 

26.3 

$ .07 
 .07 

246.6 

73.0 

107.6 

26.5 

$ .07 
 .07 

252.5 

66.7 

120.0 

13.0 

$ .04 
 .04 

254.9

60.8

112.0

46.1

$ .13
 .13

 $3,621.0 

$3,782.0 

$3,682.1 

$2,624.5

3,079.3 

3,202.2 

3,113.5 

2,341.9

82.9 

90.7 

88.1 

80.1

317.4 

95.7 

107.9 

292.3 

$ .80 
 .79 

330.5 

104.9 

112.5 

313.5 

$ .86 
 .86 

322.8 

102.1 

113.1 

299.0 

$ .82 
 .82 

292.2

91.4

104.3

113.1

$ .31
 .31

(1) The sum of quarterly per share amounts may not equal per share amounts reported for year-to-date periods.  
This is due to changes in the number of weighted shares outstanding and the effects of rounding for each period.

PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
m a r k e t   r i s k s   a n d   d e r i v a t i v e   i n s t r u m e n t s

(currencies  in  millions)

72

Interest-Rate Risks – See Note P for a description of the Company’s hedging programs and exposure to interest-rate 
fluctuations. The Company measures its interest-rate risk by estimating the amount by which the fair value of interest 
rate sensitive assets and liabilities, including derivative financial instruments, would change assuming an immediate 
100 basis point increase across the yield curve as shown in the following table:

Fair Value Gains (Losses)  

c o n s o l i d at e d :
Assets
  Cash equivalents and marketable securities 
t r u c k   a n d   o t h e r :
Liabilities

Fixed-rate long-term debt 

F i n a n c i a l   s e rv i c e s :
Assets

Fixed-rate loans 

Liabilities

Fixed-rate term debt 
Interest-rate swaps related to financial services debt 

Total 

2009 

2008

$ (2.4) 

$ (1.4)

6.8 

.5

  (40.1) 

  (50.0)

  39.7 
  30.8 
$ 34.8 

  14.8
  51.8
$ 15.7

Currency Risks – The Company enters into foreign currency exchange contracts to hedge its exposure to exchange 
rate fluctuations of foreign currencies, particularly the Canadian dollar, the euro, the British pound and the 
Mexican peso (See Note P for additional information concerning these hedges). Based on the Company’s sensitivity 
analysis, the potential loss in fair value for such financial instruments from a 10% unfavorable change in quoted 
foreign currency exchange rates would be a loss of $24.0 related to contracts outstanding at December 31, 2009, 
compared to a loss of $103.0 at December 31, 2008. These amounts would be largely offset by changes in the values 
of the underlying hedged exposures.

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
o f f i c e r s   a n d   d i r e c t o r s

73

o f f i c e r s

Mark C. Pigott
Chairman and   
 Chief Executive Officer

Thomas E. Plimpton
Vice Chairman

James G. Cardillo
President

Daniel D. Sobic
Executive Vice President

Ronald E. Armstrong
Senior Vice President

Robert J. Christensen
Senior Vice President

d i r e c t o r s

Mark C. Pigott
Chairman and   
 Chief Executive Officer
PACCAR Inc (3)

Alison J. Carnwath
Chairman 
MF Global Ltd. (2, 4)

John M. Fluke, Jr.
Chairman
Fluke Capital Management, L.P. (1, 3, 4)

Kirk S. Hachigian
Chairman and
 Chief Executive Officer
Cooper Industries, plc (2)

c o m m i t t e e s   o f   t h e   b o a r d

( 1 )   a u d i t   c o m m i t t e e
( 2 )   c o m p e n s a t i o n   c o m m i t t e e
( 3 )   e x e c u t i v e   c o m m i t t e e
( 4 )   n o m i n a t i n g   a n d   g o v e r n a n c e   c o m m i t t e e 

David C. Anderson
Vice President and 
 General Counsel

Michael T. Barkley
Vice President and Controller

T. Kyle Quinn
Vice President and   
 Chief Information Officer

Richard E. Bangert, II
Vice President

Robert A. Bengston
Vice President

Richard T. Gorman
Vice President

Timothy M. Henebry
Vice President

William D. Jackson
Vice President

William R. Kozek
Vice President

Jack K. LeVier
Vice President

Thomas A. Lundahl
Vice President

Helene N. Mawyer
Vice President

George E. West, Jr.
Vice President 

Robin E. Easton
Treasurer

Janice M. D’Amato
Secretary

Stephen F. Page
Retired Vice Chairman and
 Chief Financial Officer
United Technologies Corporation (1, 4)

William G. Reed, Jr.
Retired Chairman
Simpson Investment Company (1, 3)

Robert T. Parry
Retired President and
 Chief Executive Officer
Federal Reserve Bank 
 of San Francisco (1)

John M. Pigott
Partner
Beta Business Ventures LLC

Thomas E. Plimpton
Vice Chairman
PACCAR Inc

Gregory M. E. Spierkel
Chief Executive Officer
Ingram Micro Inc. (2)

Warren R. Staley
Retired Chairman and 
 Chief Executive Officer
Cargill Inc. (4)

Charles R. Williamson
Chairman
Weyerhaeuser Company and 
Chairman
Talisman Energy Inc. (2)

PACCAR Inc and Subsidiaries

d i v i s i o n s   a n d   s u b s i d i a r i e s

Leyland Trucks Ltd.
Croston Road
Leyland, Preston
Lancs PR26 6LZ
United Kingdom

Factory:
Leyland, Lancashire

Kenworth Méxicana, 
S.A. de C.V.
Calzada Gustavo Vildósola  

Castro 2000

Mexicali, Baja California Mexico

Factory:
Mexicali, Baja California

PACCAR
Australia Pty. Ltd.
Kenworth Trucks
Division  Headquarters:
64 Canterbury Road
Bayswater, Victoria 3153 
Australia

Factory:
Bayswater, Victoria

t r u c k   p a r t s 
a n d   s u p p l i e s

PACCAR Engine Company
1000 PACCAR Drive
Columbus, Mississippi 39701

PACCAR Parts
Division  Headquarters:
750 Houser Way N.
Renton, Washington 98055

Dynacraft
Division Headquarters:
650 Milwaukee Avenue N.
Algona, Washington 98001

w i n c h e s

PACCAR Winch Division
Division  Headquarters:
800 E. Dallas Street
Broken Arrow, Oklahoma 
74012

Factories:
Broken Arrow, Oklahoma
Okmulgee, Oklahoma

p r o d u c t   t e s t i n g , 
r e s e a r c h   a n d 
d e v e l o p m e n t

PACCAR Technical Center
Division  Headquarters:
12479 Farm to Market Road
Mount Vernon, Washington 
98273

DAF Trucks Test Center
Weverspad 2
5491 RL St. Oedenrode
The Netherlands

p a c c a r   F i n a n c i a l 
s e r v i c e s   g r o u p

PACCAR Financial Corp.
PACCAR Building
777 106th Avenue N.E.
Bellevue, Washington 98004

PACCAR Financial   
Europe B.V.
Hugo van der Goeslaan 1
P.O. Box 90065
5600 PT Eindhoven
The Netherlands

PACCAR Capital 
México S.A. de C.V.
Calzada Gustavo Vildósola  

Castro 2000

Mexicali, Baja California Mexico

PacLease Méxicana 
S.A. de C.V.
Calzada Gustavo Vildósola  

Castro 2000

Mexicali, Baja California Mexico

PACCAR Financial 
Services Ltd.
Markborough Place I
6711 Mississauga Road N. 
Mississauga, Ontario
L5N 4J8 Canada

PACCAR Financial 
Pty. Ltd.
64 Canterbury Road
Bayswater, Victoria 3153
Australia

PACCAR Leasing Company
Division of PACCAR   
Financial Corp.

PACCAR Building
777 106th Avenue N.E.
Bellevue, Washington 98004

e x p o r t   s a l e s

PACCAR International
Division  Headquarters:
PACCAR Building
777 106th Avenue N.E.
Bellevue, Washington 98004

Offices:
Beijing, People’s Republic 
  of China
Jakarta, Indonesia
Manama, Bahrain
Miami, Florida
Moscow, Russia

74

t r u c k s

Kenworth Truck Company
Division Headquarters:
10630 N.E. 38th Place
Kirkland, Washington 98033

Factories:
Chillicothe, Ohio
Renton, Washington

Peterbilt 
Motors Company
Division  Headquarters:
1700 Woodbrook Street
Denton, Texas 76205

Factory:
Denton, Texas

PACCAR of Canada Ltd.
Markborough Place I
6711 Mississauga Road N. 
Mississauga, Ontario
L5N 4J8 Canada

Factory:
Ste-Thérèse, Quebec

Canadian Kenworth 
Company
Division  Headquarters:
Markborough Place I
6711 Mississauga Road N.
Mississauga, Ontario
L5N 4J8 Canada

Peterbilt of Canada
Division  Headquarters:
Markborough Place I
6711 Mississauga Road N. 
Mississauga, Ontario
L5N 4J8 Canada

DAF Trucks N.V.
Hugo van der Goeslaan 1
P.O. Box 90065
5600 PT Eindhoven
The Netherlands

Factories:
Eindhoven, 

The Netherlands

Westerlo, Belgium

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
S T A T E M E N T   O F   C O M P A N Y   B U S I N E S S

S T O C K H O L D E R S ’

  I N F O R M A T I O N

PACCAR  is  a  global  technology  company  that  manufactures  Class  8  commercial 

vehicles  sold  around  the  world  under  the  Kenworth,  Peterbilt  and  DAF  nameplates. 

The  company  competes  in  the  North  American  Class  5-7  market  with  its  medium 

duty  models  assembled  in  North  America  and  sold  under  the  Peterbilt  and  Kenworth 

nameplates.  The  company  also  manufactures  Class  4-7  trucks  in  the  United 

Kingdom  for  sale  throughout  the  world  under  the  DAF  nameplate.  PACCAR 

distributes  aftermarket  truck  parts  to  its  dealers  through  a  worldwide  network  of 

Parts  Distribution  Centers.  Finance  and  leasing  subsidiaries  facilitate  the  sale  of 

PACCAR  products  in  many  countries  worldwide.  Significant  company  assets  are 

employed  in  financial  services  activities.  PACCAR  manufactures  and  markets 

industrial  winches  under  the  Braden,  Gearmatic  and  Carco  nameplates.  PACCAR 

maintains  exceptionally  high  standards  of  quality  for  all  of  its  products:  they  are 

well  engineered,  are  highly  customized  for  specific  applications  and  sell  in  the 

premium  segments  of  their  markets,  where  they  have  a  reputation  for  superior 

performance  and  pride  of  ownership.

CONTENTS

 

Financial Highlights

  Message to Shareholders

6 

PACCAR Operations

  Financial Charts

3  Stockholder Return Performance Graph

68  Management’s Report on Internal Control   

Over Financial Reporting

68  Report of Independent Registered Public   

Accounting Firm on the Company’s   

Consolidated Financial Statements

4  Management’s Discussion and Analysis

69  Report of Independent Registered Public   

39  Consolidated Statements of Income

40  Consolidated Balance Sheets

Accounting Firm on the Company’s   

Internal Controls

42  Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

70  Selected Financial Data

43  Consolidated Statements   

of Stockholders’ Equity

44  Consolidated Statements   

of Comprehensive Income

70  Common Stock Market Prices and Dividends

71  Quarterly Results

72  Market Risks and Derivative Instruments

73  Officers and Directors

44  Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

74  Divisions and Subsidiaries

Corporate Offices
PACCAR Building
777 106th Avenue N.E.
Bellevue, Washington
98004

Mailing Address
P.O. Box 1518
Bellevue, Washington
98009

Telephone
425.468.7400

Facsimile
425.468.8216

Web site
www.paccar.com

Stock Transfer 
and Dividend 
Dispersing Agent
Wells Fargo Bank   
Minnesota, N.A.
Shareowner Services
P.O. Box 64854
St. Paul, Minnesota 
55164-0854
800.468.9716
www.wellsfargo.com/
shareownerservices

PACCAR’s transfer agent 
maintains the company’s 
shareholder records, issues 
stock certificates and 
distributes dividends and 
IRS Form 1099. Requests 
concerning these matters 
should be directed to 
Wells Fargo.

Online Delivery of 
Annual Report and Proxy 
Statement
PACCAR’s 2009 Annual 
Report and the 2010 Proxy 
Statement are available   
on PACCAR’s Web site at 
www.paccar.com/ 
2010annualmeeting/ 

Stockholders who hold 
PACCAR stock in street   
name may inquire of their 
bank or broker about the 
availability of electronic 
delivery of annual   
meeting documents.

AeroCab, AERODYNE,   
Air Leaf, Braden, Carco, 
ComfortClass, Connect, 
DAF, Dynacraft, Gearmatic, 
Kenmex, Kenworth, 
Kenworth Clean Power, 
Leyland, Magnum, MAX-
card, PACCAR, PACCAR 
MX, PACCAR PX, PacLease, 
PacTrac, Peterbilt, PX-6,   
PX-8, The World's Best, 
TRP, UltraCab and Unibilt 
are trademarks owned by 
PACCAR Inc and its 
subsidiaries. 

Independent Auditors
Ernst & Young LLP
Seattle, Washington

SEC Form 10-K
PACCAR’s annual report 
to the Securities and 
Exchange Commission 
will be furnished to 
stockholders on request 
to the Corporate 
Secretary, PACCAR Inc, 
P.O. Box 1518, Bellevue, 
Washington 98009. It is   
also available online at   
www.paccar.com/investors/
investor_resources.asp, 
under SEC Filings.

Annual Stockholders’
Meeting
April 20, 2010, 10:30 a.m. 
Meydenbauer Center
11100 N.E. Sixth Street
Bellevue, Washington
98004

An Equal Opportunity 
Employer

This report was printed 
on recycled paper.

 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2 0 0 9   a n n u a l   r e p o r t