2 0 1 5 A N N U A L R E P O R T
S T A T E M E N T O F C O M P A N Y B U S I N E S S
PACCAR is a global technology company that designs and manufactures premium
quality light, medium and heavy duty commercial vehicles sold worldwide under
the Kenworth, Peterbilt and DAF nameplates. PACCAR designs and manufactures
diesel engines for use in its own products and for sale to third party manufacturers
of trucks and buses. PACCAR distributes aftermarket truck parts to its dealers
through a worldwide network of Parts Distribution Centers. Finance and leasing
subsidiaries facilitate the sale of PACCAR products in many countries worldwide.
PACCAR manufactures and markets industrial winches under the Braden, Carco
and Gearmatic nameplates. PACCAR maintains exceptionally high standards of
quality for all of its products: they are well engineered, highly customized for
specific applications and sell in the premium segments of their markets, where
they have a reputation for superior performance and pride of ownership.
CONTENTS
1
Financial Highlights
88 Management’s Report on Internal Control
2 Message from the Executive Chairman
Over Financial Reporting
4 Message from the Chief Executive Officer
88 Report of Independent Registered Public
8 PACCAR Operations
24 Financial Charts
Accounting Firm on the Company’s
Consolidated Financial Statements
25 Stockholder Return Performance Graph
89 Report of Independent Registered Public
26 Management’s Discussion and Analysis
Accounting Firm on the Company’s
50 Consolidated Statements of Income
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
51 Consolidated Statements
of Comprehensive Income
52 Consolidated Balance Sheets
54 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
55 Consolidated Statements
of Stockholders’ Equity
56 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
90 Selected Financial Data
90 Common Stock Market Prices and Dividends
91 Quarterly Results
92 Market Risks and Derivative Instruments
93 Officers and Directors
94 Divisions and Subsidiaries
F I N A N C I A L H I G H L I G H T S
Truck, Parts and Other Net Sales and Revenues
$17,942.8 $17,792.8
2015
2014
(millions, except per share data)
1
Financial Services Revenues
Total Revenues
Net Income
Total Assets:
Truck, Parts and Other
Financial Services
Financial Services Debt
Stockholders’ Equity
Per Common Share:
Net Income:
Basic
Diluted
Cash Dividends Declared
1,172.3
19,115.1
1,604.0
8,855.2
12,254.6
8,591.5
6,940.4
1,204.2
18,997.0
1,358.8
8,701.5
11,917.3
8,230.6
6,753.2
$
4.52
3.83
$
4.51
2.32
3.82
1.86
R E V E N U E S
billions of dollars
20.0
15.0
10.0
5.0
0.0
1.6
1.2
0.8
0.4
0.0
N E T I N C O M E
billions of dollars
S T O C K H O L D E R S ’ E Q U I T Y
billions of dollars
10.0%
8.0
40%
7.5%
6.0
5.0%
4.0
2.5%
2.0
0.0%
0.0
30%
20%
10%
0%
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
Return on Revenues (percent)
Return on Equity (percent)
T O O U R S H A R E H O L D E R S
PACCAR is celebrating 110 years of success and delivered record revenue and net profits to its
2
shareholders in 2015. It is a major milestone that speaks eloquently to the steady and consistent
leadership of the company and the unwavering commitment of all employees to exceed our
customers’ expectations by delivering the highest quality products and services. PACCAR has
achieved excellent financial results by focusing on the premium quality segment of its industr y – a
notable record considering the cyclicality of the capital goods business. PACCAR has strived to be
at the forefront of technology for over a centur y and the company’s world class range of products
and services reflect that dedicated resolve. PACCAR is one of the leading technology companies
worldwide, and innovation is a cornerstone of its success. PACCAR continues to integrate new
technology into its daily operations, such as computerized parts selection in its distribution centers
and introducing electronic connected architecture in its vehicles to profitably support its business,
as well as its dealers, customers and suppliers.
PACCAR had an excellent year in 2015 due to strong truck markets in North America and Europe
and excellent results in the financial services and aftermarket parts businesses. Customers renewed
and expanded their fleets, reflecting strong freight demand. PACCAR’s financial results benefited
from global diversification. The company has realized excellent synergies globally in product
development, sales and finance activities, purchasing and manufacturing.
T he company is a recognized environmental leader and has introduced unique water recycling
technologies, solar panels to minimize energy costs and lowered emissions from its paint operations –
all activities focused on reducing its carbon footprint. The company leads the industr y in sales of
alternative fuel vehicles. Our shareholders have enjoyed excellent returns, with steady regular
dividend growth and increased shareholder value over the years. I would like to thank the tens of
thousands of employees whose hard work, ingenuity and drive for quality through the decades have
enabled PACCAR to grow into a global technology company.
PACCAR’s superb credit rating of A+/A1 results from consistent profitability, a strong balance
sheet and excellent cash flow. PACCAR increased its regular quarterly dividend by 9 percent to
$0.24/share and declared a special dividend of $1.40/share in 2015. The special dividend was the
highest in company histor y. Regular quarterly cash dividends have more than doubled in the last
ten years. Shareholders’ equity was a record $6.94 billion at year end.
PACCAR and its employees are proud of the remarkable achievement of 77 consecutive years of
net profit. The PACCAR Board of Directors embraces a long-term view of the business, and our
shareholders have benefited from that approach. The embedded principles of integrity, quality and
consistency of purpose define the course in PACCAR’s operations. The proven business strategy –
deliver technologically advanced premium products and provide an extensive array of tailored
aftermarket customer services – enables PACCAR to pragmatically approach growth
3
opportunities.
PACCAR continues to enhance its stellar reputation as a leading technology company in the
capital goods and financial services marketplace.
.
M A R K C . P I G O T T
Executive Chairman
Februar y 18, 2016
T O O U R S H A R E H O L D E R S
PACCAR had an outstanding year in 2015, achieving record revenues of $19.12 billion and record net
4
income of $1.60 billion. PACCAR’s financial results reflect the company’s premium-quality products and
services and strong truck markets in North America and Europe, complemented by excellent aftermarket
parts and financial services results worldwide. The company has earned 77 consecutive years of net income.
These remarkable achievements reflect the efforts of our 23,000 employees delivering industry-leading
product quality and innovation, and outstanding operating efficiency. PACCAR’s superior financial strength
enabled the company to invest $548.2 million in capital projects and research and development in 2015 to
enhance its manufacturing capability, expand its range of vehicles and engines and strengthen its aftermarket
capabilities. PACCAR delivered 154,700 trucks to its customers and sold $3.06 billion of aftermarket parts.
PACCAR’s excellent credit rating of A+/A1 supported PACCAR Financial Services’ new loans and leases of
$4.44 billion. Shareholders’ equity was a year-end record $6.94 billion.
Class 8 industry truck sales in North America, including Mexico, were 301,000 vehicles in 2015 compared
to 270,000 the prior year. The European 16+ tonne market in 2015 increased to 269,000 vehicles compared
to 226,000 in 2014. Customers in North America and Europe are generating good profits due to strong
freight tonnage, low fuel prices and the superior operating efficiency of Kenworth, Peterbilt and DAF trucks.
PACCAR’s excellent financial performance in 2015 benefited from PACCAR Parts’ record pre-tax profits
and another strong profit year for PACCAR Financial Services. The company’s 2015 after-tax return on
revenues was 8.4%. After-tax return on beginning shareholder equity (ROE) was 23.8% in 2015 compared to
20.5% in 2014. PACCAR’s long-term financial performance has enabled the company to distribute $5.0
billion in dividends during the last 10 years. PACCAR’s average annual total shareholder return over the last
fifteen years was 14.6%, versus 5.0% for the S&P 500 Index.
INVESTING FOR THE FUTURE — PACCAR’s consistent profitability, strong balance sheet and intense focus on
quality, technology and productivity have allowed the company to invest $6.0 billion in the last decade in
world-class facilities, innovative products and new technologies. Productivity and efficiency improvements
of 5-7% annually and capacity expansions in the last five years have enhanced the capability of the
company’s manufacturing and parts facilities.
In 2015, capital investments were $308 million and research and development expenses were $240 million.
PACCAR expanded its vehicle product range, invested in global expansion and enhanced its manufacturing
efficiency during the year. The new Kenworth 76-inch mid-roof sleeper, Peterbilt 58-inch sleeper and the
DAF XF, CF and LF ultra-quiet, Silent models provide customers the specifications that deliver the lowest
total cost of ownership. DAF Brasil began assembly of the versatile DAF CF series and the PACCAR MX-13
engine in 2015. PACCAR’s engine factories produced a record number of PACCAR MX-13 and MX-11
engines in 2015. Kenworth and Peterbilt have installed 105,000 PACCAR engines since engine production
began in 2010. To meet the growing demand for PACCAR vehicles and engines, investments in additional
capacity are being made, including €100 million to construct a new DAF cab paint facility in Westerlo,
Belgium.
The PACCAR Technical Center in Pune, India provided excellent support to PACCAR’s global product
and technology initiatives as well as certifying many world-class automotive suppliers. In China, the
5
world’s largest truck market, PACCAR expanded its purchasing activities and continued to examine joint
venture opportunities.
SIX SIGMA — Six Sigma is integrated into all business activities at PACCAR and has been adopted at over
300 of the company’s suppliers and many of the company’s dealers and customers. Six Sigma’s statistical
methodology is critical in the development of new product designs, customer services and manufacturing
processes. Since 1997, Six Sigma has delivered billions of dollars in savings in all facets of the company.
The majority of PACCAR’s employees have been trained in Six Sigma and over 30,000 projects have been
implemented. Six Sigma, in conjunction with Supplier Quality, has been vital to improving logistics
performance and component quality from company suppliers.
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY — PACCAR’s Information Technology Division and its 770 innovative
employees are an important competitive asset for the company. PACCAR develops and integrates software
and hardware to enhance the quality and efficiency of all products and operations throughout the
company. In 2015, PACCAR was again recognized as a technology leader by InformationWeek magazine’s
“2015 Elite 100 Companies.” Over 28,000 dealers, customers, suppliers and employees have experienced
PACCAR’s Technology Centers, which highlight electronic work instructions, mobile computing, an
electronic leasing and finance office and an automated service analyst.
TRUCKS — U.S. and Canadian Class 8 industry retail sales in 2015 were 278,000 units and the Mexican
market totaled 23,000. The European Union (EU) industry 16+ tonne sales were 269,000 units.
PACCAR’s Class 8 retail sales in the U.S. and Canada achieved a market share of 27.4% in 2015. DAF
achieved a 14.6% share in the 16+ tonne truck market in Europe, compared to 13.8% the prior year.
Industry Class 6 and 7 truck retail sales in the U.S. and Canada were 82,000 units, up 12% from the
previous year. In the EU, the 6 to 16-tonne market was 49,000 units, up 5% compared to 2014. PACCAR’s
market share in the U.S. and Canada medium-duty truck segment was a record 17.4%. PACCAR’s share of
the medium-duty truck market in Europe was 9.0%. The company delivered a record 27,300 medium-duty
vehicles in 2015.
A tremendous team effort by the company’s engineering, purchasing, human resources, materials and
production employees took advantage of the strong market conditions in Europe and North America and
achieved production records at Kenworth’s Chillicothe, Ohio factory, Peterbilt’s Denton, Texas factory and
DAF’s Eindhoven factory in the Netherlands.
PACCAR’s product innovation and manufacturing expertise continued to be recognized as the industry
leader in 2015. Peterbilt’s truck factory in Denton, Texas earned Frost and Sullivan’s “Manufacturing
Leadership” awards for improvements in operational efficiencies, product innovation and next-generation
leadership development. The DAF LF was awarded “Truck of the Year” by Commercial Fleet magazine and
Leyland earned the “Best Factory Award for Supply Chain” in the United Kingdom.
PACCAR Mexico continued its sales leadership, achieving a 40.4% Class 8 market share. PACCAR
6
Mexico also produced a record number of trucks exported to the U.S. and Canada.
PACCAR Australia achieved strong results in 2015 with a combined heavy-duty market share for
Kenworth and DAF of 23.2%. PacLease Australia began operations by offering customers Kenworth and
DAF rental, full-service lease and contract maintenance programs tailored to their specific needs.
AFTERMARKET CUSTOMER SERVICES — PACCAR Parts had strong revenues and record pre-tax profits in 2015
as dealers and customers accelerated adoption of innovative eCommerce platforms and global fleet service
programs offering national pricing and centralized billing. With sales of $3.06 billion, PACCAR Parts is the
primary source for aftermarket parts and services for PACCAR vehicles, as well as supplying its “TRP” branded
parts for all makes of trucks, trailers and buses. Over six million heavy-duty trucks operate in North America
and Europe. The large vehicle parc and the growing number of PACCAR MX engines installed in Peterbilt and
Kenworth trucks in North America create excellent demand for parts and service and moderate the cyclicality
of truck sales.
PACCAR Parts expanded its facilities to enhance logistics performance to dealers and customers. PACCAR
Parts’ construction of a new 160,000 square-foot distribution center in Renton, Washington will be completed
in the second quarter of 2016 to support increased parts demand in the U.S. and Canada. PACCAR Parts
continues to lead the industry with technology that offers competitive advantages at PACCAR dealerships.
FINANCIAL SERVICES — PACCAR Financial Services’ (PFS) conservative business approach, coupled with
PACCAR’s superb S&P credit rating of A+ and the strength of the dealer network, enabled PFS to earn
excellent pre-tax profits in 2015. PACCAR issued $1.9 billion in medium-term notes at attractive rates
during the year. The PACCAR Financial Services group of companies has operations covering four
continents and 22 countries. The global breadth of PFS and its rigorous credit application process
support a portfolio of 175,000 trucks and trailers, with total assets of $12.3 billion. PACCAR Financial
Corp. is the preferred funding source in North America for Peterbilt and Kenworth trucks, financing 19%
of dealer Class 8 sales in the U.S. and Canada in 2015. Strategically located used truck centers, interactive
webcasts and targeted marketing enabled PFS to sell over 8,800 used trucks worldwide.
PACCAR Financial Europe (PFE) focuses on the financing of new and used DAF trucks. PFE provides
wholesale and retail financing for DAF dealers and customers in 15 European countries, and in 2015
financed 24% of DAF’s 6+ tonne vehicle sales.
PACCAR Leasing (PacLease) represents one of the largest full-service truck rental and leasing
operations in North America and Germany and began operations in Australia in 2015. PacLease placed
6,600 new PACCAR vehicles in service and expanded its fleet to a record 39,000 vehicles.
ENVIRONMENTAL LEADERSHIP — PACCAR is a global environmental leader. All PACCAR manufacturing
facilities have earned ISO 14001 environmental certification. The company’s manufacturing facilities
enhanced their “Zero Waste to Landfill” programs during the year. PACCAR joined the CDP (formerly
known as the Carbon Disclosure Project), which aligns corporate environmental goals with national and
local “green” initiatives. PACCAR earned an excellent disclosure score of 97 (out of 100) and a
performance score of A-, placing it in the top 5 percent of globally reporting companies.
7
A LOOK AHEAD — PACCAR’s 23,000 employees enable the company to distinguish itself as a global leader
in the technology, capital goods, financial services and aftermarket parts businesses. The outlook for 2016
is good in North America as the economy is expected to generate growth of 2-3%. The European
economy is expected to grow 1.5-2%.
The North American truck market demand is expected to be good this year and the European truck
market is forecast to be strong again in 2016 as anticipated economic growth will support heavy-duty
truck demand. Current estimates for the 2016 Class 8 truck industry in the U.S. and Canada indicate that
truck sales could range from 230,000-260,000 units. Sales of Class 6-7 trucks are expected to be between
70,000-80,000 vehicles. The European 16+ tonne truck market in 2016 is estimated to be in the range of
260,000-290,000 trucks, while demand for medium-duty trucks should range from 45,000-55,000 units.
PACCAR Parts’ industry-leading services and strong freight demand in North America and Europe
should deliver continued growth of the company’s aftermarket parts business. PACCAR Financial is
expected to perform well due to good economies in North America and Europe.
PACCAR’s industry-leading range of vehicles, modern high technology factories and superb customer
service in parts and financial services provide an excellent foundation for future growth. PACCAR is well
positioned and committed to maintaining the profitable results its shareholders expect.
R O N A L D E . A R M S T R O N G
Chief Executive Officer
Februar y 18, 2016
PACCAR Executive Operating Committee
First Row Left to Right: Dan Sobic, Ron Armstrong, Bob Christensen, Marco Davila, Dave Anderson
Back Row Left to Right: Kyle Quinn, Bob Bengston, Harrie Schippers, Gary Moore, Michael Barkley,
Jack LeVier
P E T E R B I L T M O T O R S C O M P A N Y
Peterbilt’s Denton manufacturing facility celebrated its 35th anniversary and achieved
record production. Peterbilt launched a new set-forward front axle version of its
9
vocational Model 567 and introduced its SmartLINQ connected truck technology.
Peterbilt’s Denton, Texas assembly facility produced a record number of trucks in 2015 as it celebrated its 35th
anniversary. Peterbilt’s continuous improvement in operational efficiencies and production innovation was
recognized by Frost & Sullivan’s Manufacturing Leadership Council. Peterbilt earned two “Operational Excellence
Leadership” awards and an award in “Next-Generation Leadership”.
The 100,000th PACCAR MX-13 engine produced for North America was installed in a Peterbilt Model 579.
Peterbilt announced availability of the new lightweight, fuel-efficient PACCAR MX-11 engine for the Model 579,
Model 567 and Model 320 in 2016.
Peterbilt introduced new technologies and strengthened its vocational truck
leadership with the new set-forward front axle (SFFA) Model 567. It
is the newest set-forward model in the industry, features up to
three percent more payload and is construction-ready for
severe-service applications. Peterbilt’s Model 567 SFFA
optimizes weight distribution and is bridge law compliant.
Peterbilt increased fuel efficiency by up to three percent with
Predictive Cruise Control technology on its Model 579 and Model 567. Predictive Cruise
Control integrates the powertrain and cruise control with satellite mapping to anticipate terrain changes which
optimizes fuel economy.
SmartLINQ connected truck technology provides Peterbilt customers with real-time diagnostic information
to maximize vehicle performance. SmartLINQ is factory installed and integrated on all Peterbilt vehicles
equipped with the PACCAR MX-13 engine.
Peterbilt’s new 58-inch sleeper enables vocational and short- and regional-haul operations to reduce weight
by up to 100 lbs. with an updated driver environment that includes excellent storage, a refrigerator and a
luxurious sleeping area. Peterbilt expanded its natural gas powered vehicle offerings with the introduction of its
Model 579 and Model 567 in Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) configurations and the medium-duty Model 337 and
Model 348 in Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) configurations.
Peterbilt launched its Red Oval pre-owned truck program providing premium used trucks throughout its
dealer network and PACCAR Financial used truck centers.
Peterbilt added 25 dealerships, growing its North American dealer network to a record 332 locations.
The Peterbilt Model 579 EPIQ package offers state-of-the-art aerodynamics, industry-leading performance and the fuel economy of the
PACCAR MX-13 engine. The “Class” of the industry appeals to customers who demand uncompromising quality, reliability and low
cost of operation in their fleets.
K E N W O R T H T R U C K C O M P A N Y
The Kenworth T880, equipped with the PACCAR MX-13 engine, earned the prestigious
“2015 Commercial Truck of the Year” award from the American Truck Dealers.
11
Kenworth delivered a record number of trucks and grew market share to 14.8 percent.
Kenworth, “The World’s Best”, introduced a new, integral 76-inch mid-roof sleeper configuration that offers
bulk hauling and flatbed operations a lightweight, fuel-efficient option with 100-lb. weight savings and up to a
five percent fuel economy gain. The sleeper features excellent functionality and best-in-class comfort to
maximize driver satisfaction.
Kenworth continues to be an industry fuel economy leader. In 2015, Kenworth
improved vehicle fuel economy by five percent by designing an optimized
powertrain based on the PACCAR MX-13 engine, coupled with Predictive Cruise
Control that utilizes GPS to anticipate changes in terrain. Over 40 percent of
Kenworth’s new heavy-duty trucks are powered by the reliable, technologically
advanced PACCAR MX engine.
Kenworth’s state-of-the-art truck assembly plants in Chillicothe, Ohio; Renton,
Washington; and the PACCAR plant in Ste.-Thérèse, Quebec set a new production
record of 48,000 trucks, while achieving reductions in greenhouse gas emissions,
energy and water usage and solid waste. Kenworth’s Renton plant is a leader in
environmental stewardship and earned King County’s “Best Workplace for Waste
Prevention and Recycling Award” for the seventh consecutive year. The Ste.-Thérèse
plant produced its milestone 150,000th truck, a Kenworth T370.
Kenworth “Right Choice” customer events held at the Kenworth truck plants, PACCAR Engine plant
and the PACCAR Technical Center gave thousands of customers the opportunity to experience Kenworth’s
product range, innovative technology and PACCAR engine performance.
Kenworth launched the proprietary Truck Tech+ advanced diagnostics system that delivers real-time
information to fleet managers and dealers on vehicle performance. Kenworth introduced its Driver Performance
Assistant and shift advice aid, which provides in-dash information that can be used by a driver to improve
operating efficiency with up to a three percent fuel economy increase.
Kenworth set a medium-duty market share record of 9.2 percent. Kenworth increased sales of the medium-
duty K270 and K370 cabover trucks by expanding its range of vocational medium-duty options and increased
sales of the T270 and T370 conventional trucks by over 26 percent. All Kenworth medium-duty vehicles are
powered exclusively by the PACCAR PX-7 and PX-9 engines.
The Kenworth dealer network expanded to 362 locations in the U.S. and Canada. Dealers invested $137
million in their new facilities.
The award-winning Kenworth T880 establishes an unsurpassed standard of industry excellence with rugged reliability, exceptional
performance, low operating cost and remarkable comfort for demanding vocational truck applications. The T880 has enabled Kenworth to
achieve an industry-leading market share for vocational truck sales for five years in a row.
D A F T R U C K S
DAF Trucks N.V. produced its one millionth truck, enhanced its Euro 6 product range
and expanded in the ASEAN, African and South American markets, strengthening its
13
position as a leading global commercial vehicle manufacturer.
DAF launched the DAF Transport Efficiency program which includes innovative upgrades of its state-of-the-
art PACCAR MX-11 and MX-13 engines. Advanced vehicle technologies, such as Predictive Cruise Control and
Predictive Shifting based on sophisticated GPS technology were integrated with the PACCAR MX engines.
The versatile DAF CF series, with the fuel-efficient PACCAR PX-7 engine, is available in three axle
configurations delivering 6.5 tonnes of additional payload. The new, ultra-silent DAF LF, CF and XF models can
operate at sound levels less than 72 dB, which enables goods to be distributed in urban locations with strict
night or early morning noise restrictions.
The DAF CF Silent earned the “Fleet Transport Truck Innovation Award” in Ireland for its sophisticated design and
ease of operation. In the United Kingdom, Commercial Fleet magazine named the LF “Truck of the Year” - up to 7.5
tonnes, and awarded DAF “Truck Fleet Manufacturer of the Year”.
At the RAI vehicle exhibition in Amsterdam, the
Netherlands, DAF announced a new online fleet management
system that will become available on Euro 6 CF and XF
vehicles in the first half of 2016. DAF Connect provides the
operator with real-time information about truck diagnostics
and location in order to maximize efficiency.
DAF strengthened its presence in markets outside the EU. In Taiwan, a new DAF assembly plant doubled
production capacity for LF, CF and XF trucks to further expand market leadership. DAF trucks were introduced
in Malaysia and Colombia. A company-owned sales and marketing organization was established in Turkey.
DAF began construction of a new state-of-the-art €100 million cab paint facility at its Westerlo, Belgium
plant. The new facility is scheduled to be operational in the first half of 2017 and will support DAF’s global
growth. DAF’s production plant in Eindhoven, the Netherlands manufactured its one millionth truck and
established a new quarterly production record in the fourth quarter 2015.
DAF’s market-leading TRP aftermarket parts program has been expanded to over 110,000 truck, bus and
trailer parts, supported by DAF’s excellent dealer network. In addition, 22 dedicated TRP retail stores were
opened to offer customers all-makes parts supply.
DAF’s independent dealer network expanded to 1,100 locations. In 2015, DAF further extended its
distribution network by adding 67 new dealer facilities in Western and Central Europe, Russia, the Middle East,
South America and Asia.
The DAF XF Euro 6 is a leader in a variety of transport and vocational applications, offering customers superior quality,
ergonomics, comfort and operating efficiency. DAF is at the forefront of product innovation, offering sophisticated vehicle
technologies like Predictive Cruise Control and Predictive Shifting.
P A C C A R A U S T R A L I A
PACCAR Australia achieved a 23.2 percent share in the Australian heavy-duty truck
14
market. Since 1971, PACCAR Australia has delivered over 56,000 Kenworth and DAF
vehicles which operate in one of the world’s most demanding environments.
PACCAR Australia’s market leadership was enhanced by the launch of the Limited Edition Kenworth Legend
950. Based on the Kenworth T950 model, the Legend 950 combines features that celebrate Kenworth’s heritage in
Australia with updated options, including LED headlights. The comfort and productivity of the Kenworth K200
was enhanced with the introduction of the Automated Cab Entry system, which deploys cab access steps to assist
drivers with cab entry and exit.
The new DAF LF 2016 edition was introduced at the Brisbane Truck Show, earning excellent reviews for its
class-leading performance. The PACCAR MX-13 engine continued to increase share due to its unparalleled
productivity, industry-leading performance and fuel efficiency.
PacLease Australia began operations by offering Kenworth and DAF vehicles with rental, full-service lease and
contract maintenance programs tailored to customers’ specific needs. PACCAR Parts expanded its Fleet Services
program, which provides fleets with guaranteed national pricing and centralized billing, and achieved 34 percent
growth in its TRP all-makes parts brand for trucks and trailers.
Kenworth and DAF trucks are renowned in Australia for their reliability under the most challenging operating conditions.
Paclease Australia provides customers with flexible leasing and rental solutions to meet the dynamic needs of their
businesses.
P A C C A R M E X I C O
PACCAR Mexico (KENMEX) achieved a 40.4 percent share of the Class 8 market in
Mexico in 2015 and introduced new Euro 4 and Euro 5 vehicles in Latin America.
15
KENMEX has manufactured 251,000 vehicles since its founding in 1959.
KENMEX produces a broad range of Kenworth and Peterbilt Class 5-8 vehicles for NAFTA, Central America
and Andean countries in its state-of-the-art 590,000 square-foot production facilities in Mexicali, Mexico.
KENMEX built 16,000 vehicles in 2015 and introduced the new Kenworth T680 and T880, equipped with Euro 4
and Euro 5 engines, at major Latin American truck shows, including COLFECAR in Colombia and Expotransporte in
Guadalajara, Mexico.
KENMEX is a leader in continuous improvement investments that resulted in a 20 percent increase in
production capacity, as well as improvements in factory operational efficiency. KENMEX’s new T680/T880 hood
bonding project makes KENMEX one of the leading composite part manufacturers and will improve production
efficiency by 30 percent.
KENMEX’s 237 dealer locations in Mexico and Latin America and the world-class PACCAR Parts Distribution
Centers (PDC) in San Luis Potosi, Mexico and Santiago, Chile offer unrivaled customer support.
The Kenworth T680, equipped with the PACCAR MX-13 engine, offers customers advanced aerodynamics, lower operating
costs and premium styling and comfort.
L E Y L A N D T R U C K S
Leyland, the United Kingdom’s leading truck manufacturer, produced its 400,000th
16
vehicle in 2015 and delivered 14,500 DAF vehicles to customers in Europe, Asia,
Australia, the Middle East, Russia and the Americas.
Leyland’s highly efficient 710,000-square-foot manufacturing facility features a technologically advanced production
system which incorporates a robotic chassis paint system and electronic work instructions to deliver engineering
designs and build instructions to employees. Leyland builds the full DAF product range of LF, CF and XF models for
right- and left-hand drive markets. Leyland produced its 400,000th vehicle in 2015.
The new DAF LF 2016 Edition, equipped with the PACCAR PX-5 engine, increases fuel efficiency by up to five
percent. A new vehicle aero package contributes to fuel efficiency gains of up to four percent with additional features
including a 12 speed AS-Tronic automated gearbox, longer wheel base options and enhanced fuel tank
configurations. Advanced technologies such as Lane Departure Warning, Advanced Emergency Braking and Forward
Collision Warning enhance safety.
Leyland earned the “Best Factory Award for Supply Chain” in the United Kingdom, recognizing Leyland’s innovative
material handling systems as well as its world-class manufacturing capabilities. The DAF LF was named “Truck of the
Year” at the Commercial Fleet Awards 2015 and DAF Trucks was awarded “Truck Fleet Manufacturer of the Year”.
Leyland manufactures the full DAF product range of LF, CF and XF models for right- and left-hand drive markets, offering superior
operating efficiency, technology and productivity. The DAF LF is the ideal truck for urban and vocational applications.
P A C C A R G L O B A L G R O W T H
PACCAR sells DAF, Kenworth and Peterbilt trucks and parts to customers in 100
countries on six continents. In 2015, PACCAR expanded its geographic diversification
17
through significant investments in Brasil, ASEAN and India.
DAF Brasil began assembly of the versatile DAF CF series and the PACCAR MX-13 engine in 2015. The DAF
CF’s excellent maneuverability, sturdy design, powerful PACCAR MX engine and broad range of chassis and
axle configurations make it ideal for many applications. The DAF CF is an excellent vehicle that complements
the DAF XF in the marketplace. DAF Brasil dealers opened new dealership facilities in 2015, offering customers
best-in-class products, service and facilities.
A new DAF assembly plant in Taiwan doubled production capacity of DAF LF, CF and XF trucks to further
expand market leadership. DAF trucks were introduced in Malaysia and Colombia. A new dealer was appointed
in Angola, further supporting DAF’s sales and marketing efforts on the African continent.
DAF achieved additional growth in Qatar and Israel. New dealerships will open in ASEAN countries, the
Middle East and West Africa in 2016 to enhance sales opportunities. PACCAR has expanded its component
purchases from ASEAN, India and China for production and aftermarket operations.
The DAF assembly facility in Taiwan builds the full range of DAF XF, CF and LF models. DAF Brasil’s Ponta Grossa plant began
assembly of PACCAR engines. PACCAR engineering teams in India support the PACCAR truck divisions around the world. PACCAR
engines power buses throughout Europe and Asia.
P A C C A R P A R T S
PACCAR Parts achieved record pre-tax profit and strong worldwide revenue in 2015,
18
delivering 1.4 million parts shipments to over 2,000 Kenworth, Peterbilt and DAF
dealer locations.
PACCAR Parts expanded its global Fleet Services program offering national pricing and centralized billing
to over 650 commercial vehicle fleets with more than 600,000 vehicles. PACCAR Parts’ advanced eCommerce
program allows customers 24/7 online ordering access to quality aftermarket products. eCommerce delivers
the benefits of the Kenworth Privileges, Peterbilt Preferred, DAF MAX and TRP Performance loyalty programs.
PACCAR Parts operates 17 Parts Distribution Centers worldwide with 2.2 million square-feet of
warehouse space. In 2015, PACCAR Parts began construction of a new 160,000 square-foot Parts Distribution
Center in Renton, Washington to support increased parts demand in the U.S. and Canada. This new facility,
scheduled to open in 2016, will support the distribution of PACCAR Genuine and TRP parts.
PACCAR Parts’ successful TRP aftermarket brand for trucks, trailers and buses offers 110,000 part
numbers. PACCAR dealers expanded TRP aftermarket parts retail stores to 36 locations in 19 countries. TRP
offers customers cost-effective choices for quality parts for vehicle and trailer repair and maintenance.
PACCAR Parts Distribution Centers use advanced inventory management technology. PACCAR Customer Support Centers provide
industry-leading support to global truck operators. TRP branded stores sell quality TRP aftermarket parts for all makes of trucks, trailers,
and buses. PACCAR Parts’ new Renton distribution center, to be completed in 2016, will expand customer support in North America.
P A C C A R E N G I N E C O M P A N Y
PACCAR engines were installed in 40 percent of Kenworth and Peterbilt heavy-duty
vehicles in 2015, and in all DAF vehicles. Customers realized the benefits of PACCAR
19
MX engines’ superior reliability, excellent fuel economy and low cost of ownership.
PACCAR is one of the premier diesel engine manufacturers in the world, with over 800,000 square-feet of
production facilities in Columbus, Mississippi and Eindhoven, the Netherlands. PACCAR also operates two world-
class engine research and development centers with 46 sophisticated engine test cells and a full climatic chassis
dyno to enhance its engine design and manufacturing capability. With over 55 years of engine development and
manufacturing expertise, PACCAR has delivered over 1.3 million engines, with the Columbus facility producing its
100,000th engine since opening in 2010.
The PACCAR MX-13 engine is a global engine platform incorporating precision manufacturing, advanced
design and premium materials to deliver best-in-class operating efficiency, performance and durability. The new
PACCAR MX-11 engine, with power ratings up to 440 horsepower and 1,550 lb.-ft. of torque, was successfully
launched in Europe in 2013 and is available in Kenworth and Peterbilt trucks beginning January 2016.
PACCAR engine factories in the Netherlands and Mississippi represent technology leadership in commercial vehicle diesel engine
production. PACCAR engines are standard in DAF, Kenworth and Peterbilt vehicles worldwide, where they have earned a reputation for
superior reliability, durability and operating efficiency.
P A C C A R F I N A N C I A L S E R V I C E S
PACCAR Financial Services (PFS), which supports the sale of PACCAR trucks
20
worldwide, achieved retail market share of 26 percent and earned pre-tax profits of
$363 million in 2015.
The PFS portfolio is comprised of 175,000 trucks and trailers, with total assets of $12.3 billion. PACCAR’s
excellent balance sheet, complemented by its A+/A1 credit rating, enabled PFS to issue $1.9 billion in three-, four-,
and five-year medium term notes in 2015. Consistent access to the capital markets allowed PFS to support the sale
of Kenworth, Peterbilt and DAF trucks in 22 countries on four continents. PFS sold over 8,800 pre-owned
PACCAR trucks worldwide in 2015.
For over 50 years, PACCAR Financial Corp. (PFC) has facilitated the sale of premium Kenworth and Peterbilt
trucks in the U.S. and Canada. PFC financed 66 percent of dealer inventories and 19 percent of new Kenworth
and Peterbilt Class 8 trucks sold or leased. PFC enhanced its state-of-the-art Finance Sales and Credit system,
further streamlining the credit application and contract funding process.
PACCAR Financial Europe (PFE) has $2.8 billion in assets and provides financial services to DAF dealers and
customers in 15 European countries. PFE achieved a 24 percent retail market share in 2015.
PACCAR Financial facilitates the sale of premium-quality PACCAR vehicles worldwide by offering a full range
of financial products and by utilizing leading-edge web-based information technologies to streamline
communication for dealers and customers.
P A C C A R L E A S I N G C O M P A N Y
PACCAR Leasing provided a strong profit contribution as it celebrated its 35th
anniversary and increased its worldwide fleet to over 39,000 vehicles.
21
PacLease offers premium-quality Kenworth, Peterbilt and DAF vehicles exclusively, and is a leasing industry
leader in introducing new technologies, such as advanced safety features, on-board telematics and the latest
aerodynamic capabilities. In 2015, PacLease delivered over 6,600 Kenworth, Peterbilt and DAF vehicles to
customers in North America, Europe and Australia.
In its 35th anniversary year, PacLease expanded internationally by entering the Australia full-service truck
rental and leasing market. The first Australian PacLease location opened in Melbourne, with additional
expansion planned for 2016.
Kenworth and Peterbilt vehicles powered by PACCAR MX-13 engines represented 61 percent of all PacLease
Class 8 orders in the U.S. and Canada due to the engine’s superior productivity, reliability and fuel efficiency.
PacLease will offer the PACCAR MX-11 engine in Peterbilt and Kenworth vehicles in 2016.
PacLease Mexico continued its expansion and has a record fleet size of 7,800 trucks and trailers, making it the
largest full-service lease provider in Mexico. PacLease operates a fleet of over 2,800 trucks and trailers in Europe.
PacLease provides its customers with innovative transportation solutions and premium-quality Kenworth, Peterbilt and
DAF vehicles. Already offering one of the most extensive truck leasing networks in the world, PacLease opened its first
location in Australia in 2015.
P A C C A R T E C H N I C A L C E N T E R S
PACCAR’s Technical Centers’ (PTC) world-class product development, simulation and
22
validation capabilities accelerate product development and ensure that PACCAR
continues to deliver the highest quality products in the industry.
PACCAR’s Technical Centers in Europe and North America are equipped with state-of-the-art product
development and validation capabilities and staffed with experts in powertrain and vehicle development. The
advanced engineering tools in the Technical Centers are utilized to innovate and accelerate the launch of new
products. A new climatic wind tunnel and engine test cells were opened at the Mt. Vernon PTC in 2015. These
investments enable testing of full-size truck aerodynamics and powertrain performance under a wide range of
operating temperatures and altitude conditions. Proprietary road simulators replicate millions of road miles in
weeks instead of years. Sophisticated computer simulations and advanced analysis of engine and vehicle control
systems optimize vehicle safety, aerodynamics and durability.
PACCAR’s Technical Centers partner with government agencies and academic institutions to evaluate
emerging vehicle technologies. The PTCs leverage these partnerships to identify innovative designs that will
further improve the industry-leading performance and fuel efficiency of Kenworth, Peterbilt and DAF trucks.
PACCAR Technical Centers in Europe and North America advance the quality and competitiveness of PACCAR products worldwide. In 2015,
PACCAR opened a new climatic wind tunnel, further enhancing the state-of-the-art capabilities at its Mt. Vernon, Washington facility.
I N F O R M A T I O N T E C H N O L O G Y D I V I S I O N
PACCAR’s Information Technology Division (ITD) is an industry leader in innovative
digital technologies which enhance the quality of all PACCAR operations and
23
systematically connect dealers, suppliers and customers.
PACCAR was recognized as a leader in InformationWeek magazine’s list of “2015 Elite 100 companies”,
highlighting leading innovators of advanced technologies. ITD achieved 2015 recognition for its development of
mobile applications using a leading-edge toolset.
ITD’s 770 employees collaborate with PACCAR divisions in the application of new technologies to enhance
manufacturing, financial services, aftermarket logistics and engineering design. This year ITD partnered with
Kenworth and Peterbilt to develop and launch Remote Diagnostics for vehicles with the PACCAR MX-13 engine.
ITD also introduced PacLink, a mobile diagnostic tool that fits into a technician’s pocket.
ITD partnered with DAF to deliver manufacturing automation to support engine assembly in the DAF Brasil
factory. ITD also expanded the use of data analytics technologies for manufacturing, aftermarket and finance
programs.
One of the most innovative information technology organizations in the world, PACCAR ITD partners with leading hardware and
software companies to enhance PACCAR’s competitiveness, manufacturing efficiency, product quality, customer service and profitability.
F I N A N C I A L C H A R T S
24
U.S. AND CANADA
CLASS 8 MARKET SHARE
WESTERN AND CENTRAL EUROPE
16+ TONNE MARKET SHARE
trucks (000)
340
retail sales
30%
trucks (000)
340
registrations
17%
255
170
85
0
24
18
12
6
0
16%
15%
14%
13%
28%
255
26%
170
24%
85
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
22%
0
■ Total U.S. and Canada Class 8 Units
■ Total Western and Central Europe
16+ Tonne Units
PACCAR Market Share (percent)
PACCAR Market Share (percent)
T O TA L A S S E T S
billions of dollars
GEOGRAPHIC REVENUE
billions of dollars
20
15
10
5
0
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
■ Truck, Parts and Other
■ Financial Services
■ United States
■ Rest of World
FINANCIAL CHARTS
S T O C K H O L D E R R E T U R N P E R F O R M A N C E G R A P H
25
The following line graph compares the yearly percentage change in the cumulative total stockholder return on the
Company’s common stock, to the cumulative total return of the Standard & Poor’s Composite 500 Stock Index
and the return of the industry peer groups of companies identified in the graph (the “Current Peer Group Index”
and the “Prior Peer Group Index”) for the last five fiscal years ended December 31, 2015. Effective January 1,
2015, the Company revised its peer group to include CNH Industrial N.V. (the parent company of Iveco) and
removed Scania AB, which was acquired in 2014 and is no longer publicly traded. Standard & Poor’s has
calculated a return for each company in the peer group indices weighted according to its respective capitalization
at the beginning of each period with dividends reinvested on a monthly basis. Management believes that the
identified companies and methodology used in the graph for the peer group indices provides a better comparison
than other indices available. The Current Peer Group Index consists of AGCO Corporation, Caterpillar Inc.,
Cummins Inc., Dana Holding Corporation, Deere & Company, Eaton Corporation, Meritor Inc., Navistar
International Corporation, Oshkosh Corporation, AB Volvo and CNH Industrial N.V. CNH Industrial N.V. is
included from September 30, 2013, when it began trading on the New York Stock Exchange. The Prior Peer
Group Index consists of AGCO Corporation, Caterpillar Inc., Cummins Inc., Dana Holding Corporation, Deere &
Company, Eaton Corporation, Meritor Inc., Navistar International Corporation, Oshkosh Corporation, AB Volvo
and Scania AB. The comparison assumes that $100 was invested December 31, 2010, in the Company’s common
stock and in the stated indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends.
PACCAR Inc
S&P 500 Index
Current Peer Group Index
Prior Peer Group Index
200
150
100
50
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
PACCAR Inc
S&P 500 Index
Current Peer Group Index
Prior Peer Group Index
2010
100
100
100
100
2011
67.51
2012
84.46
102.11
118.45
86.52
84.66
97.64
97.53
2013
113.93
156.82
113.61
111.95
2014
134.66
178.29
108.97
114.14
200
150
100
50
2015
2015
98.14
180.75
85.51
88.97
M A N A G E M E N T ’ S D I S C U S S I O N A N D A N A L Y S I S O F F I N A N C I A L
C O N D I T I O N A N D R E S U L T S O F O P E R A T I O N S
26
O V E R V I E W :
PACCAR is a global technology company whose Truck segment includes the design and manufacture of high-quality,
light-, medium- and heavy-duty commercial trucks. In North America, trucks are sold under the Kenworth and
Peterbilt nameplates, in Europe, under the DAF nameplate and in Australia and South America, under the Kenworth
and DAF nameplates. The Parts segment includes the distribution of aftermarket parts for trucks and related
commercial vehicles. The Company’s Financial Services segment derives its earnings primarily from financing or
leasing PACCAR products in North America, Europe and Australia. The Company’s Other business includes the
manufacturing and marketing of industrial winches.
Consolidated net sales and revenues of $19.12 billion in 2015 were the highest in the Company’s history. The
increase from $18.99 billion in 2014 was primarily due to stronger industry truck sales in the U.S. and Europe,
partially offset by the effects of translating weaker foreign currencies, primarily the euro, to the U.S. dollar.
In 2015, PACCAR earned net income for the 77th consecutive year. Net income in 2015 of $1.60 billion was the
highest in the Company’s history, increasing from $1.36 billion in 2014. The results reflect increased truck sales in
the U.S. and Europe and strong aftermarket parts and financial services results. The U.S. truck market benefited
from record freight demand and expansion of industry fleet capacity. Earnings per diluted share were $4.51
compared to $3.82 in 2014.
The Company is expanding its range of PACCAR engines in North America with the introduction of the PACCAR
MX-11 engine, with an output of up to 430 HP and 1,550 lb.-ft. of torque. The PACCAR MX-11 is scheduled to be
available in Kenworth and Peterbilt trucks in early 2016. The PACCAR MX-11 engine is designed to deliver
excellent performance and fuel economy, industry-leading durability and reliability, and a quiet operating
environment for the driver.
Kenworth and Peterbilt launched new vehicle technologies that provide customers real-time diagnostic information
to enhance their vehicle operating performance. Kenworth TruckTech+ and Peterbilt SmartLinq diagnostic systems
are in production on new Class 8 trucks equipped with the PACCAR MX-13 engine. In addition, Predictive Cruise
Control is in production for Kenworth T680 and T660 trucks and Peterbilt Model 579 and Model 567 trucks,
specified with the PACCAR MX-13 engine. The new driver assist systems integrate cruise control with global
positioning system data to anticipate road contours, enabling the PACCAR MX-13 engine to achieve outstanding
fuel economy.
Kenworth and Peterbilt have developed additional technologies to enhance customers’ driver performance and
profitability. Driver Performance Assistant and Driver Shift Aid are standard equipment on Kenworth T680 and
T660 trucks and Peterbilt Model 579 and Model 567 trucks, specified with the PACCAR MX-13 engine. Driver
Performance Assistant provides drivers with real-time coaching on driving behavior and a scoring system to optimize
driver performance and fuel economy. Driver Shift Aid provides drivers in vehicles with manual transmissions a
visual cue to shift at the optimal RPM and engine torque to maximize fuel economy.
DAF introduced the new LF 2016 Edition which features enhancements to the PACCAR PX-5 4.5 liter engine,
resulting in up to 5% better fuel efficiency. In addition, a new DAF aerodynamic package results in 4% better fuel
efficiency, while advanced technologies such as Lane Departure Warning System, Advanced Emergency Braking
System, Forward Collision Warning and Adaptive Cruise Control enhance comfort and safety.
PACCAR Parts added 18 dealer-owned TRP stores in 2015, building on the success of PACCAR Parts’ TRP brand of
aftermarket parts for all makes of medium- and heavy-duty trucks, trailers and buses. TRP stores are strategically
located to bring TRP products and technical expertise close to the customer. PACCAR’s new 160,000 square-foot
distribution center in Renton, Washington is under construction and is expected to open in the second quarter of
2016.
The PACCAR Financial Services (PFS) group of companies has operations covering four continents and 22 countries.
The global breadth of PFS and its rigorous credit application process support a portfolio of loans and leases with
total assets of $12.25 billion that earned pre-tax profit of $362.6 million. PFS issued $1.92 billion in medium-term
notes during the year to support portfolio growth.
In 2015, the Company’s capital investments were $308.4 million compared to $223.1 million in 2014, and research
and development (R&D) expenses were $239.8 million in 2015 compared to $215.6 million in 2014.
27
Truck Outlook
Truck industry retail sales in the U.S. and Canada in 2016 are expected to be 230,000 to 260,000 units compared to
278,400 in 2015. In Europe, the 2016 truck industry registrations for over 16-tonne vehicles are projected to increase
to a range of 260,000 to 290,000 units, compared to the 269,100 truck registrations in 2015. In South America,
heavy-duty truck industry sales were 74,000 units in 2015, and the 2016 heavy-duty truck industry sales are estimated
to be in a range of 70,000 to 80,000 units.
Parts Outlook
In 2016, PACCAR Parts sales in North America are expected to increase 3-5%, reflecting steady economic growth
and high fleet utilization. In 2016, Europe aftermarket sales are expected to increase 3-5%, reflecting good freight
markets and PACCAR Parts’ innovative customer service programs. The U.S. dollar value of sales in Europe may
continue to be affected by recent declines in the value of the euro relative to the U.S. dollar.
Financial Services Outlook
Based on the truck market outlook, average earning assets in 2016 are expected to be comparable to the record levels
achieved in 2015. Current strong levels of freight tonnage, freight rates and fleet utilization are contributing to
customers’ profitability and cash flow. If current freight transportation conditions decline due to weaker economic
conditions, then past due accounts, truck repossessions and credit losses would likely increase from the current low
levels and new business volumes would likely decline.
Capital Spending and R&D Outlook
Capital investments in 2016 are expected to be $325 to $375 million, and R&D is expected to be $240 to $270
million focused on enhanced aftermarket support, manufacturing facilities and new product development.
See the Forward-Looking Statements section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis for factors that may affect
these outlooks.
R E S U L T S O F O P E R A T I O N S :
($ in millions, except per share amounts)
Year Ended December 31,
Net sales and revenues:
Truck
Parts
Other
Truck, Parts and Other
Financial Services
Income (loss) before income taxes:
Truck
Parts
Other
Truck, Parts and Other
Financial Services
Investment income
Income taxes
Net Income
Diluted earnings per share
Return on revenues
2015
2014
2013
$ 14,782.5
3,060.1
100.2
17,942.8
1,172.3
$ 19,115.1
$ 1,440.3
555.6
(43.2)
1,952.7
362.6
21.8
(733.1)
$ 1,604.0
4.51
$
$ 14,594.0
3,077.5
121.3
17,792.8
1,204.2
$ 18,997.0
$ 1,160.1
496.7
(31.9)
1,624.9
370.4
22.3
(658.8)
$ 1,358.8
3.82
$
$ 13,002.9
2,822.2
123.8
15,948.9
1,174.9
$ 17,123.8
$
936.7
416.0
(26.5)
1,326.2
340.2
28.6
(523.7)
$ 1,171.3
3.30
$
8.4%
7.2%
6.8%
28
The following provides an analysis of the results of operations for the Company’s three reportable segments - Truck,
Parts and Financial Services. Where possible, the Company has quantified the impact of factors identified in the
following discussion and analysis. In cases where it is not possible to quantify the impact of factors, the Company
lists them in estimated order of importance. Factors for which the Company is unable to specifically quantify the
impact include market demand, fuel prices, freight tonnage and economic conditions affecting the Company’s results
of operations.
2015 Compared to 2014:
Truck
The Company’s Truck segment accounted for 77% of total revenues for both 2015 and 2014.
($ in millions)
Year Ended December 31,
Truck net sales and revenues:
U.S. and Canada
Europe
Mexico, South America, Australia and other
Truck income before income taxes
2015
2014
% change
$ 9,774.3
3,472.1
1,536.1
$ 14,782.5
$ 1,440.3
$ 8,974.5
3,657.6
1,961.9
$ 14,594.0
$ 1,160.1
9
(5)
(22)
1
24
Pre-tax return on revenues
9.7%
7.9%
The Company’s worldwide truck net sales and revenues increased to $14.78 billion from $14.59 billion in 2014,
primarily due to higher truck deliveries in the U.S and Europe. The effects of translating weaker foreign currencies
to the U.S. dollar, primarily the euro, reduced 2015 worldwide truck net sales and revenues by $940.0 million.
Truck segment income before income taxes and pre-tax return on revenues reflect higher truck unit deliveries and
improved gross margins in the U.S. and Europe. The effects on income before income taxes of translating weaker
foreign currencies to the U.S. dollar, primarily the euro, were largely offset by lower costs of North American MX
engine components imported from Europe.
The Company’s new truck deliveries are summarized below:
Year Ended December 31,
U.S. and Canada
Europe
Mexico, South America, Australia and other
Total units
2015
91,300
47,400
16,000
154,700
2014
84,800
39,500
18,600
142,900
% change
8
20
(14)
8
In 2015, industry retail sales in the heavy-duty market in the U.S. and Canada increased to 278,400 units from
249,400 units in 2014. The Company’s heavy-duty truck retail market share was 27.4% compared to 27.9% in 2014.
The medium-duty market was 82,400 units in 2015 compared to 73,300 units in 2014. The Company’s medium-
duty market share was a record 17.4% in 2015 compared to 16.7% in 2014.
The over 16-tonne truck market in Western and Central Europe in 2015 was 269,100 units, a 19% increase from
226,300 units in 2014. DAF market share was 14.6% in 2015, an increase from 13.8% in 2014. The 6 to 16-tonne
market in 2015 was 49,000 units compared to 46,500 units in 2014. DAF market share was 9.0% in 2015, an increase
from 8.9% in 2014.
The major factors for the changes in net sales and revenues, cost of sales and revenues and gross margin between
2015 and 2014 for the Truck segment are as follows:
29
($ in millions)
2014
Increase (decrease)
Truck delivery volume
Average truck sales prices
Average per truck material, labor and other direct costs
Factory overhead and other indirect costs
Operating leases
Currency translation
Total increase (decrease)
2015
net
sales
cost
of sales
gross
margin
$ 14,594.0
$ 13,105.5
$ 1,488.5
1,131.1
78.2
(80.8)
(940.0)
188.5
$ 14,782.5
884.1
(107.7)
29.6
(75.6)
(857.6)
(127.2)
$ 12,978.3
247.0
78.2
107.7
(29.6)
(5.2)
(82.4)
315.7
$ 1,804.2
• Truck delivery volume reflects higher truck deliveries in the U.S. and Canada and Europe which resulted in
higher sales ($1,413.2 million) and cost of sales ($1,113.6 million), partially offset by lower truck deliveries in
Mexico and Australia which resulted in lower sales ($288.2 million) and costs of sales ($233.1 million).
• Average truck sales prices increased sales by $78.2 million, primarily due to improved price realization in Europe.
• Average cost per truck decreased cost of sales by $107.7 million, primarily due to lower material costs, reflecting
lower commodity prices and lower costs of North American MX engine components imported from Europe
which benefited from the decline in the value of the euro.
• Factory overhead and other indirect costs increased $29.6 million, primarily due to higher supplies and
maintenance costs ($31.1 million).
• Operating lease revenues decreased by $80.8 million and cost of sales decreased by $75.6 million due to lower
average asset balances.
• The currency translation effect on sales and cost of sales reflects a decline in the value of foreign currencies
relative to the U.S. dollar, primarily the euro.
• Truck gross margins in 2015 of 12.2% increased from 10.2% in 2014 due to the factors noted above.
Truck selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) for 2015 decreased to $192.6 million from $198.2 million
in 2014. The decrease was primarily due to currency translation effect ($21.8 million), mostly related to a decline in
the value of the euro relative to the U.S. dollar, partially offset by higher promotion and marketing costs ($11.6
million) and higher salaries and related expenses ($7.6 million). As a percentage of sales, SG&A decreased to 1.3%
in 2015 compared to 1.4% in 2014, reflecting higher sales volume.
Parts
The Company’s Parts segment accounted for 16% of total revenues for both 2015 and 2014.
($ in millions)
Year Ended December 31,
Parts net sales and revenues:
U.S. and Canada
Europe
Mexico, South America, Australia and other
Parts income before income taxes
2015
2014
% change
$ 1,969.4
773.9
316.8
$ 3,060.1
555.6
$
$ 1,842.9
867.2
367.4
$ 3,077.5
496.7
$
7
(11)
(14)
(1)
12
Pre-tax return on revenues
18.2%
16.1%
30
The Company’s worldwide parts net sales and revenues were $3.06 billion in 2015 compared to $3.08 billion in 2014.
Higher aftermarket demand in North America and Europe was offset by a decline in the value of foreign currencies
relative to the U.S. dollar, primarily the euro, which reduced 2015 worldwide parts net sales and revenues by $193.3
million.
The increase in Parts segment income before income taxes and pre-tax return on revenues in 2015 was primarily due
to higher sales and gross margins. This was partially offset by a decline in the value of foreign currencies relative to
the U.S. dollar, primarily the euro, which reduced 2015 Parts segment income before income taxes by $34.1 million.
The major factors for the changes in net sales and revenues, cost of sales and revenues and gross margin between
2015 and 2014 for the Parts segment are as follows:
($ in millions)
2014
Increase (decrease)
Aftermarket parts volume
Average aftermarket parts sales prices
Average aftermarket parts direct costs
Warehouse and other indirect costs
Currency translation
Total (decrease) increase
2015
net
sales
cost
of sales
gross
margin
$ 3,077.5
$ 2,281.7
$
795.8
123.5
52.4
(193.3)
(17.4)
$ 3,060.1
69.1
2.9
7.3
(128.6)
(49.3)
$ 2,232.4
54.4
52.4
(2.9)
(7.3)
(64.7)
31.9
827.7
$
• Higher market demand, primarily in the U.S. and Canada and Europe, resulted in increased aftermarket parts
sales volume of $123.5 million and related cost of sales of $69.1 million.
• Average aftermarket parts sales prices increased sales by $52.4 million reflecting improved price realization in the
U.S. and Canada ($31.1 million) and Europe ($21.3 million).
• Average aftermarket parts direct costs increased $2.9 million due to higher material costs.
• Warehouse and other indirect costs increased $7.3 million, primarily due to additional costs to support higher
sales volume.
• The currency translation effect on sales and cost of sales reflects a decline in the value of foreign currencies
relative to the U.S. dollar, primarily the euro.
• Parts gross margins in 2015 of 27.0% increased from 25.9% in 2014 due to the factors noted above.
Parts SG&A expense for 2015 decreased to $194.7 million from $207.5 million in 2014. The decrease was primarily
due to the effects of currency translation ($21.7 million), mostly related to a decline in the value of the euro relative
to the U.S. dollar, partially offset by higher salaries and related expenses ($10.3 million). As a percentage of sales,
Parts SG&A decreased to 6.4% in 2015 from 6.7% in 2014.
Financial Services
The Company’s Financial Services segment accounted for 6% of total revenues for both 2015 and 2014.
31
($ in millions)
Year Ended December 31,
New loan and lease volume:
U.S. and Canada
Europe
Mexico and Australia
New loan and lease volume by product:
Loans and finance leases
Equipment on operating lease
New loan and lease unit volume:
Loans and finance leases
Equipment on operating lease
Average earning assets:
U.S. and Canada
Europe
Mexico and Australia
Average earning assets by product:
Loans and finance leases
Dealer wholesale financing
Equipment on lease and other
Revenues:
U.S. and Canada
Europe
Mexico and Australia
Revenue by product:
Loans and finance leases
Dealer wholesale financing
Equipment on lease and other
Income before income taxes
2015
2014
% change
$ 2,758.7
1,039.0
639.5
$ 4,437.2
$ 3,383.0
1,054.2
$ 4,437.2
33,300
10,700
44,000
$ 7,458.3
2,512.9
1,536.1
$ 11,507.3
$ 7,239.9
1,775.2
2,492.2
$ 11,507.3
$
675.5
278.6
218.2
$ 1,172.3
$
384.7
59.1
728.5
$ 1,172.3
362.6
$
$ 2,798.3
988.1
668.7
$ 4,455.1
$ 3,516.7
938.4
$ 4,455.1
32,900
9,000
41,900
$ 6,779.0
2,683.8
1,721.4
$ 11,184.2
$ 7,269.3
1,462.0
2,452.9
$ 11,184.2
$
641.2
317.8
245.2
$ 1,204.2
$
410.3
52.3
741.6
$ 1,204.2
370.4
$
(1)
5
(4)
(4)
12
1
19
5
10
(6)
(11)
3
21
2
3
5
(12)
(11)
(3)
(6)
13
(2)
(3)
(2)
New loan and lease volume was $4.44 billion in 2015 compared to $4.46 billion in 2014. PFS finance market share
on new PACCAR truck sales was 25.9% in 2015 compared to 27.7% in 2014 due to increased competition.
PFS revenue decreased to $1.17 billion in 2015 from $1.20 billion in 2014. The decrease was primarily due to the
effects of translating weaker foreign currencies to the U.S. dollar and lower yields, partially offset by revenues on
higher average earning asset balances. The effects of currency translation lowered PFS revenues by $79.3 million for
2015. PFS income before income taxes decreased to $362.6 million from $370.4 million in 2014, primarily due to
the effects of translating weaker foreign currencies into the U.S. dollar and lower yields, partially offset by higher
average earning asset balances and lower borrowing rates. The effects of currency translation lowered PFS income
before income taxes by $21.9 million for 2015.
32
The major factors for the changes in interest and fees, interest and other borrowing expenses and finance margin
between 2015 and 2014 are outlined below:
($ in millions)
2014
Increase (decrease)
Average finance receivables
Average debt balances
Yields
Borrowing rates
Currency translation
Total decrease
2015
interest
and fees
interest and other
borrowing expenses
finance
margin
$
462.6
$
133.7
$
328.9
42.8
(28.2)
(33.4)
(18.8)
443.8
$
10.1
(15.4)
(10.4)
(15.7)
118.0
$
42.8
(10.1)
(28.2)
15.4
(23.0)
(3.1)
325.8
$
• Average finance receivables increased $883.8 million (excluding foreign exchange effects) in 2015 as a result of
retail portfolio new business volume exceeding collections.
• Average debt balances increased $713.8 million (excluding foreign exchange effects) in 2015. The higher average
debt balances reflect funding for a higher average earning asset portfolio, including loans, finance leases and
equipment on operating leases.
• Lower market rates resulted in lower portfolio yields (5.0% in 2015 compared to 5.3% in 2014) and lower
borrowing rates (1.4% in 2015 compared to 1.6% in 2014).
• The currency translation effects reflect a decline in the value of foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar.
The following table summarizes operating lease, rental and other revenues and depreciation and other expenses:
($ in millions)
Year Ended December 31,
Operating lease and rental revenues
Used truck sales and other
Operating lease, rental and other revenues
Depreciation of operating lease equipment
Vehicle operating expenses
Cost of used truck sales and other
Depreciation and other expenses
2015
691.6
36.9
728.5
466.6
90.7
26.4
583.7
$
$
$
$
2014
712.2
29.4
741.6
472.3
100.6
15.6
588.5
$
$
$
$
The major factors for the changes in operating lease, rental and other revenues, depreciation and other expenses and
lease margin between 2015 and 2014 are outlined below:
($ in millions)
2014
Increase (decrease)
Used truck sales
Results on returned lease assets
Average operating lease assets
Revenue and cost per asset
Currency translation and other
Total decrease
2015
operating lease, rental
and other revenues
depreciation and
other expenses
lease
margin
$
741.6
$
588.5
$
153.1
9.5
17.3
8.1
(48.0)
(13.1)
728.5
$
11.9
7.7
13.6
4.6
(42.6)
(4.8)
583.7
$
(2.4)
(7.7)
3.7
3.5
(5.4)
(8.3)
144.8
$
• A higher volume of used truck sales increased operating lease, rental and other revenues by $9.5 million and
33
increased depreciation and other expenses by $11.9 million.
• Results on returned lease assets increased depreciation and other expenses by $7.7 million, primarily due to lower
gains on sales of returned lease units.
• Average operating lease assets increased $188.2 million in 2015 (excluding foreign exchange effects), which
increased revenues by $17.3 million and related depreciation and other expenses by $13.6 million.
• Revenue per asset increased $8.1 million primarily due to higher fee income and higher rental rates, partially
offset by lower fuel revenue. Cost per asset increased $4.6 million, primarily due to higher depreciation expense,
partially offset by lower fuel expense.
• The currency translation effects reflect a decline in the value of foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar,
primarily the euro.
The following table summarizes the provision for losses on receivables and net charge-offs:
($ in millions)
2015
2014
U.S. and Canada
Europe
Mexico and Australia
provision for
losses on
receivables
$
$
7.7
1.9
2.8
12.4
net
charge-offs
4.6
$
3.9
4.6
13.1
$
provision for
losses on
receivables
$
$
6.1
5.4
3.9
15.4
net
charge-offs
5.1
$
6.5
4.4
16.0
$
The provision for losses on receivables was $12.4 million in 2015, a decrease of $3.0 million compared to 2014,
mainly due to improved portfolio performance in Europe and the effects of translating weaker foreign currencies to
the U.S. dollar, partially offset by higher portfolio balances in Europe and the U.S. and Canada.
The Company modifies loans and finance leases as a normal part of its Financial Services operations. The Company
may modify loans and finance leases for commercial reasons or for credit reasons. Modifications for commercial
reasons are changes to contract terms for customers that are not considered to be in financial difficulty. Insignificant
delays are modifications extending terms up to three months for customers experiencing some short-term financial
stress, but not considered to be in financial difficulty. Modifications for credit reasons are changes to contract terms
for customers considered to be in financial difficulty. The Company’s modifications typically result in granting more
time to pay the contractual amounts owed and charging a fee and interest for the term of the modification. When
considering whether to modify customer accounts for credit reasons, the Company evaluates the creditworthiness of
the customers and modifies those accounts that the Company considers likely to perform under the modified terms.
When the Company modifies loans and finance leases for credit reasons and grants a concession, the modifications
are classified as troubled debt restructurings (TDR).
The post-modification balance of accounts modified during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 are
summarized below:
($ in millions)
2015
2014
Commercial
Insignificant delay
Credit - no concession
Credit - TDR
recorded
investment
% of total
portfolio*
recorded
investment
% of total
portfolio*
$
$
166.8
70.0
36.6
44.4
317.8
2.3%
1.0%
.5%
.5%
4.3%
$
$
181.6
64.1
31.5
26.4
303.6
2.5%
.9%
.4%
.4%
4.2%
* Recorded investment immediately after modification as a percentage of the year-end retail portfolio balance.
34
In 2015, total modification activity increased compared to 2014, primarily due to higher modifications for credit -
TDRs, partially offset by the effects of translating weaker foreign currencies to the U.S. dollar and lower commercial
modifications. TDR modifications increased primarily due to contract modifications in Mexico. The decrease in
commercial modifications reflects lower volumes of refinancing.
The following table summarizes the Company’s 30+ days past due accounts:
At December 31,
Percentage of retail loan and lease accounts 30+ days past due:
U.S. and Canada
Europe
Mexico and Australia
Worldwide
2015
.3%
.7%
1.3%
.5%
2014
.1%
1.1%
2.0%
.5%
Accounts 30+ days past due were .5% at December 31, 2015 and 2014, as higher past due accounts in the U.S. and
Canada were offset by lower past dues in all other markets. The Company continues to focus on maintaining low
past due balances.
When the Company modifies a 30+ days past due account, the customer is then generally considered current under
the revised contractual terms. The Company modified $2.6 million of accounts worldwide during the fourth quarter
of 2015 and $4.0 million during the fourth quarter of 2014 that were 30+ days past due and became current at the
time of modification. Had these accounts not been modified and continued to not make payments, the pro forma
percentage of retail loan and lease accounts 30+ days past due would have been as follows:
At December 31,
Pro forma percentage of retail loan and lease accounts 30+ days past due:
U.S. and Canada
Europe
Mexico and Australia
Worldwide
2015
.3%
.7%
1.6%
.6%
2014
.1%
1.2%
2.3%
.6%
Modifications of accounts in prior quarters that were more than 30 days past due at the time of modification are
included in past dues if they were not performing under the modified terms at December 31, 2015 and 2014. The
effect on the allowance for credit losses from such modifications was not significant at December 31, 2015 and 2014.
The Company’s 2015 and 2014 pre-tax return on average earning assets for Financial Services was 3.2% and 3.3%,
respectively.
Other
Other includes the winch business as well as sales, income and expenses not attributable to a reportable segment,
including a portion of corporate expense. Other sales represents less than 1% of consolidated net sales and revenues
for 2015 and 2014. Other SG&A was $58.7 million in 2015 and $59.5 million in 2014. The decrease in SG&A was
primarily due to lower salaries and related expenses. Other income (loss) before tax was a loss of $43.2 million in
2015 compared to a loss of $31.9 million in 2014. The higher loss in 2015 was primarily due to lower income before
tax from the winch business which has been affected by lower oilfield related business.
Investment income was $21.8 million in 2015 compared to $22.3 million in 2014. The lower investment income in
2015 was primarily due to the effects of translating weaker foreign currencies to the U.S. dollar, partially offset by
higher realized gains and average portfolio balances.
Income Taxes
The 2015 effective income tax rate of 31.4% decreased from 32.7% in 2014. The decrease in the effective tax rate
was primarily due to an increase in research tax credits in 2015.
35
($ in millions)
Year Ended December 31,
Domestic income before taxes
Foreign income before taxes
Total income before taxes
Domestic pre-tax return on revenues
Foreign pre-tax return on revenues
Total pre-tax return on revenues
2015
$ 1,581.6
755.5
$ 2,337.1
2014
$ 1,267.3
750.3
$ 2,017.6
13.7%
9.9%
12.2%
12.4%
8.6%
10.6%
The improvement in income before income taxes and return on revenues for domestic operations was primarily due
to higher revenues from trucks and parts operations and higher truck and parts margins. The increase in foreign
income before income taxes was primarily due to higher revenues from trucks and parts operations and higher truck
and parts margins, partially offset by translating weaker foreign currencies to the U.S. dollar, primarily the euro. The
improvement in return on revenues for foreign operations was primarily due to higher revenues and margins from
European truck and parts operations.
2014 Compared to 2013:
Truck
The Company’s Truck segment accounted for 77% and 76% of total revenues for 2014 and 2013, respectively.
($ in millions)
Year Ended December 31,
Truck net sales and revenues:
U.S. and Canada
Europe
Mexico, South America, Australia and other
Truck income before income taxes
2014
2013
% change
$ 8,974.5
3,657.6
1,961.9
$ 14,594.0
$ 1,160.1
$ 7,138.1
3,844.4
2,020.4
$ 13,002.9
936.7
$
26
(5)
(3)
12
24
Pre-tax return on revenues
7.9%
7.2%
The Company’s worldwide truck net sales and revenues increased to $14.59 billion from $13.0 billion in 2013,
primarily due to higher truck deliveries in the U.S. and Canada, higher price realization in Europe related to higher
content Euro 6 emission vehicles, partially offset by lower truck deliveries in Europe and Mexico.
Truck segment income before income taxes and pre-tax return on revenues reflect higher truck unit deliveries and
improved price realization in the U.S. and Canada and lower R&D spending, partially offset by lower deliveries in
Europe and Mexico.
The Company’s new truck deliveries are summarized below:
Year Ended December 31,
U.S. and Canada
Europe
Mexico, South America, Australia and other
Total units
2014
84,800
39,500
18,600
142,900
2013
68,700
48,400
20,000
137,100
% change
23
(18)
(7)
4
36
In 2014, industry retail sales in the heavy-duty market in the U.S. and Canada increased to 249,400 units from
212,200 units in 2013. The Company’s heavy-duty truck retail market share was 27.9% compared to 28.0% in 2013.
The medium-duty market was 73,300 units in 2014 compared to 65,900 units in 2013. The Company’s medium-
duty market share was 16.7% in 2014 compared to 15.7% in 2013.
The over 16-tonne truck market in Western and Central Europe in 2014 was 226,300 units, a 6% decrease from
240,800 units in 2013. The largest decreases were in the U.K. and France, partially offset by increases in Germany
and Spain. The Company’s market share was 13.8% in 2014, a decrease from 16.2% in 2013. The decrease in
market share was primarily due to the lower DAF registrations in the U.K. and the Netherlands which were impacted
by the Euro 5/Euro 6 transition rules. The 6 to 16-tonne market in 2014 was 46,500 units compared to 57,200 units
in 2013. The Company’s market share was 8.9% in 2014, a decrease from 11.8% in 2013. The decline in market
share is a result of reduced registrations in the U.K., which were also affected by the Euro 5/Euro 6 transition rules.
The major factors for the changes in net sales and revenues, cost of sales and revenues and gross margin between
2014 and 2013 for the Truck segment are as follows:
($ in millions)
2013
Increase (decrease)
Truck delivery volume
Average truck sales prices
Average per truck material, labor and other direct costs
Factory overhead and other indirect costs
Operating leases
Currency translation
Total increase
2014
net
sales
cost
of sales
gross
margin
$ 13,002.9
$ 11,691.9
$ 1,311.0
1,265.8
477.4
(7.2)
(144.9)
1,591.1
$ 14,594.0
1,086.9
408.6
63.6
(12.5)
(133.0)
1,413.6
$ 13,105.5
178.9
477.4
(408.6)
(63.6)
5.3
(11.9)
177.5
$ 1,488.5
• Truck delivery volume reflects higher truck deliveries in the U.S. and Canada which resulted in higher sales
($1,798.6 million) and cost of sales ($1,511.5 million), partially offset by lower truck deliveries in Europe and
Mexico which resulted in lower sales ($564.3 million) and costs of sales ($457.8 million).
• Average truck sales prices increased sales by $477.4 million, primarily due to higher content Euro 6 emission
vehicles in Europe ($274.9 million), improved price realization in the U.S. and Canada ($146.6 million) and in
Mexico ($31.9 million).
• Average cost per truck increased cost of sales by $408.6 million, primarily due to higher content Euro 6 emission
vehicles in Europe ($352.6 million).
• Factory overhead and other indirect costs increased $63.6 million, primarily due to higher salaries and related
costs ($59.5 million) to support higher sales volume, higher depreciation expense ($13.0 million), partially offset
by lower Euro 6 project expenses ($17.4 million).
• Operating lease revenues and cost of sales decreased due to lower average asset balances as lease maturities
exceeded new lease volume.
• Truck gross margins in 2014 of 10.2% increased from 10.1% in 2013 due to factors noted above.
Truck SG&A expenses for 2014 decreased to $198.2 million from $214.1 million in 2013. The decrease was primarily
due to lower promotion and marketing costs. As a percentage of sales, SG&A decreased to 1.4% in 2014 compared
to 1.6% in 2013, reflecting higher sales volume and ongoing cost controls.
Parts
The Company’s Parts segment accounted for 16% of total revenues for both 2014 and 2013.
37
($ in millions)
Year Ended December 31,
Parts net sales and revenues:
U.S. and Canada
Europe
Mexico, South America, Australia and other
Parts income before income taxes
2014
2013
% change
$ 1,842.9
867.2
367.4
$ 3,077.5
496.7
$
$ 1,635.5
828.3
358.4
$ 2,822.2
416.0
$
13
5
3
9
19
Pre-tax return on revenues
16.1%
14.7%
The Company’s worldwide parts net sales and revenues increased due to higher aftermarket demand in all markets.
The increase in Parts segment income before taxes and pre-tax return on revenues was primarily due to higher sales
and gross margins.
The major factors for the changes in net sales and revenues, cost of sales and revenues and gross margin between
2014 and 2013 for the Parts segment are as follows:
($ in millions)
2013
Increase (decrease)
Aftermarket parts volume
Average aftermarket parts sales prices
Average aftermarket parts direct costs
Warehouse and other indirect costs
Currency translation
Total increase
2014
net
sales
cost
of sales
gross
margin
$ 2,822.2
$ 2,107.0
$
715.2
187.8
82.5
(15.0)
255.3
$ 3,077.5
120.0
57.8
8.0
(11.1)
174.7
$ 2,281.7
67.8
82.5
(57.8)
(8.0)
(3.9)
80.6
795.8
$
• Higher market demand in all markets resulted in increased aftermarket parts sales volume of $187.8 million and
related cost of sales by $120.0 million.
• Average aftermarket parts sales prices increased sales by $82.5 million reflecting improved price realization in all
markets.
• Average aftermarket parts direct costs increased $57.8 million due to higher material costs in all markets.
• Warehouse and other indirect costs increased $8.0 million primarily due to additional costs to support higher
sales volume.
• Parts gross margins in 2014 of 25.9% increased from 25.3% in 2013 due to the factors noted above.
Parts SG&A expense for 2014 increased to $207.5 million from $204.1 million in 2013. The increase was primarily
due to higher salaries and related expenses. As a percentage of sales, Parts SG&A decreased to 6.7% in 2014 from
7.2% in 2013, reflecting higher sales volume.
38
Financial Services
The Company’s Financial Services segment accounted for 6% and 7% of total revenues for 2014 and 2013,
respectively.
($ in millions)
Year Ended December 31,
New loan and lease volume:
U.S. and Canada
Europe
Mexico and Australia
New loan and lease volume by product:
Loans and finance leases
Equipment on operating lease
New loan and lease unit volume:
Loans and finance leases
Equipment on operating lease
Average earning assets:
U.S. and Canada
Europe
Mexico and Australia
Average earning assets by product:
Loans and finance leases
Dealer wholesale financing
Equipment on lease and other
Revenues:
U.S. and Canada
Europe
Mexico and Australia
Revenue by product:
Loans and finance leases
Dealer wholesale financing
Equipment on lease and other
Income before income taxes
2014
2013
% change
$ 2,798.3
988.1
668.7
$ 4,455.1
$ 3,516.7
938.4
$ 4,455.1
32,900
9,000
41,900
$ 6,779.0
2,683.8
1,721.4
$ 11,184.2
$ 7,269.3
1,462.0
2,452.9
$ 11,184.2
$
641.2
317.8
245.2
$ 1,204.2
$
410.3
52.3
741.6
$ 1,204.2
370.4
$
$ 2,617.4
838.3
862.9
$ 4,318.6
$ 3,368.1
950.5
$ 4,318.6
32,200
9,000
41,200
$ 6,331.9
2,495.9
1,770.1
$ 10,597.9
$ 6,876.3
1,490.9
2,230.7
$ 10,597.9
$
626.6
303.5
244.8
$ 1,174.9
$
407.7
55.1
712.1
$ 1,174.9
340.2
$
7
18
(23)
3
4
(1)
3
2
2
7
8
(3)
6
6
(2)
10
6
2
5
2
1
(5)
4
2
9
In 2014, new loan and lease volume of $4.46 billion increased 3% compared to $4.32 billion in 2013. PFS finance
market share on new PACCAR truck sales was 27.7% in 2014 compared to 29.2% in 2013 due to increased
competition.
PFS revenue of $1.20 billion in 2014 was comparable to $1.17 billion in 2013. PFS income before income taxes
increased to a record $370.4 million compared to $340.2 million in 2013, primarily due to higher finance and lease
margins related to increased average earning asset balances.
The major factors for the changes in interest and fees, interest and other borrowing expenses and finance margin
between 2014 and 2013 are outlined below:
39
($ in millions)
2013
Increase (decrease)
Average finance receivables
Average debt balances
Yields
Borrowing rates
Currency translation
Total (decrease) increase
2014
interest
and fees
interest and other
borrowing expenses
finance
margin
$
462.8
$
155.9
$
306.9
23.7
(19.1)
(4.8)
(.2)
462.6
$
5.3
(26.0)
(1.5)
(22.2)
133.7
$
23.7
(5.3)
(19.1)
26.0
(3.3)
22.0
328.9
$
• Average finance receivables increased $462.3 million (net of foreign exchange effects) in 2014 as a result of retail
portfolio new business volume exceeding collections.
• Average debt balances increased $329.4 million in 2014 (net of foreign exchange effects). The higher average
debt balances reflect funding for a higher average earning asset portfolio, including loans, finance leases and
equipment on operating leases.
• Lower market rates resulted in lower portfolio yields (5.3% in 2014 and 5.6% in 2013) and lower borrowing rates
(1.6% in 2014 and 2.0% in 2013).
The following table summarizes operating lease, rental and other revenues and depreciation and other expenses:
($ in millions)
Year Ended December 31,
Operating lease and rental revenues
Used truck sales and other
Operating lease, rental and other revenues
Depreciation of operating lease equipment
Vehicle operating expenses
Cost of used truck sales and other
Depreciation and other expenses
2014
712.2
29.4
741.6
472.3
100.6
15.6
588.5
$
$
$
$
2013
663.0
49.1
712.1
435.4
98.1
38.2
571.7
$
$
$
$
40
The major factors for the changes in operating lease, rental and other revenues, depreciation and other expenses and
lease margin between 2014 and 2013 are outlined below:
($ in millions)
2013
Increase (decrease)
Used truck sales
Results on returned lease assets
Average operating lease assets
Revenue and cost per asset
Currency translation and other
Total increase
2014
operating lease, rental
and other revenues
depreciation and
other expenses
lease
margin
$
712.1
$
571.7
$
140.4
(20.5)
39.7
10.5
(.2)
29.5
741.6
$
(20.7)
(6.5)
30.6
15.7
(2.3)
16.8
588.5
$
.2
6.5
9.1
(5.2)
2.1
12.7
153.1
$
• A lower volume of used truck sales decreased operating lease, rental and other revenues by $20.5 million and
decreased depreciation and other expenses by $20.7 million.
• Average operating lease assets increased $222.3 million in 2014, which increased revenues by $39.7 million and
related depreciation and other expenses by $30.6 million.
• Revenue per asset increased $10.5 million due to higher rental rates, partially offset by lower fee income. Cost
per asset increased $15.7 million due to higher depreciation and maintenance expenses.
The following table summarizes the provision for losses on receivables and net charge-offs:
($ in millions)
2014
2013
U.S. and Canada
Europe
Mexico and Australia
provision for
losses on
receivables
$
$
6.1
5.4
3.9
15.4
net
charge-offs
5.1
$
6.5
4.4
16.0
$
provision for
losses on
receivables
$
$
1.9
7.4
3.6
12.9
net
charge-offs
.5
$
11.0
2.1
13.6
$
The provision for losses on receivables was $15.4 million in 2014, an increase of $2.5 million compared to 2013,
mainly due to a higher portfolio balance in the U.S., higher past dues resulting from a weaker mining industry in
Australia, partially offset by improved portfolio performance across other markets.
The Company modifies loans and finance leases as a normal part of its Financial Services operations. The Company
may modify loans and finance leases for commercial reasons or for credit reasons. Modifications for commercial
reasons are changes to contract terms for customers that are not considered to be in financial difficulty. Insignificant
delays are modifications extending terms up to three months for customers experiencing some short-term financial
stress, but not considered to be in financial difficulty. Modifications for credit reasons are changes to contract terms
for customers considered to be in financial difficulty. The Company’s modifications typically result in granting more
time to pay the contractual amounts owed and charging a fee and interest for the term of the modification. When
considering whether to modify customer accounts for credit reasons, the Company evaluates the creditworthiness of
the customers and modifies those accounts that the Company considers likely to perform under the modified terms.
When the Company modifies loans and finance leases for credit reasons and grants a concession, the modifications
are classified as troubled debt restructurings (TDR).
The post-modification balances of accounts modified during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 are
summarized below:
41
($ in millions)
2014
2013
Commercial
Insignificant delay
Credit - no concession
Credit - TDR
recorded
investment
% of total
portfolio*
recorded
investment
% of total
portfolio*
$
$
181.6
64.1
31.5
26.4
303.6
2.5%
.9%
.4%
.4%
4.2%
$
$
233.0
110.1
24.2
13.6
380.9
3.2%
1.6%
.3%
.2%
5.3%
* Recorded investment immediately after modification as a percentage of the year-end retail portfolio balance.
In 2014, total modification activity decreased compared to 2013 primarily due to lower modifications for commercial
reasons and insignificant delays, partially offset by an increase in TDR modifications. The decrease in commercial
modifications primarily reflects lower levels of additional equipment financed and end-of-contract modifications.
The decline in modifications for insignificant delays reflects 2013 extensions granted to two customers in Australia
primarily due to business disruptions arising from flooding. TDR modifications increased primarily due to a
contract modification for a large customer in the U.S.
The following table summarizes the Company’s 30+ days past due accounts:
At December 31,
Percentage of retail loan and lease accounts 30+ days past due:
U.S. and Canada
Europe
Mexico and Australia
Worldwide
2014
.1%
1.1%
2.0%
.5%
2013
.3%
.7%
1.4%
.5%
Accounts 30+ days past due were .5% at December 31, 2014 and 2013. The higher past dues in Europe, Mexico and
Australia were offset by lower past dues in the U.S. and Canada. The Company continues to focus on maintaining
low past due balances.
When the Company modifies a 30+ days past due account, the customer is then generally considered current under
the revised contractual terms. The Company modified $4.0 million of accounts worldwide during the fourth quarter
of 2014 and $4.9 million during the fourth quarter of 2013 that were 30+ days past due and became current at the
time of modification. Had these accounts not been modified and continued to not make payments, the pro forma
percentage of retail loan and lease accounts 30+ days past due would have been as follows:
At December 31,
Pro forma percentage of retail loan and lease accounts 30+ days past due:
U.S. and Canada
Europe
Mexico and Australia
Worldwide
2014
.1%
1.2%
2.3%
.6%
2013
.3%
.8%
1.7%
.6%
Modifications of accounts in prior quarters that were more than 30 days past due at the time of modification are
included in past dues if they were not performing under the modified terms at December 31, 2014 and 2013. The
effect on the allowance for credit losses from such modifications was not significant at December 31, 2014 and 2013.
The Company’s 2014 and 2013 pre-tax return on average earning assets for Financial Services was 3.3% and 3.2%,
respectively.
42
Other
Other includes the winch business as well as sales, income and expenses not attributable to a reportable segment,
including a portion of corporate expense. Other sales represent approximately 1% of consolidated net sales and
revenues for 2014 and 2013. Other SG&A was $59.5 million in 2014 and $47.1 million in 2013. The increase in
SG&A was primarily due to higher salaries and related expenses of $11.4 million. Other income (loss) before tax was
a loss of $31.9 million in 2014 compared to a loss of $26.5 million in 2013. The higher loss in 2014 was primarily
due to higher salaries and related expenses and lower income before tax from the winch business.
Investment income was $22.3 million in 2014 compared to $28.6 million in 2013. The lower investment income in
2014 primarily reflects lower yields on investments due to lower market interest rates, partially offset by higher
average investment balances.
Income Taxes
The 2014 effective income tax rate of 32.7% increased from 30.9% in 2013. The increase in the effective tax rate was
primarily due to a higher proportion of income generated in higher taxed jurisdictions.
($ in millions)
Year Ended December 31,
Domestic income before taxes
Foreign income before taxes
Total income before taxes
Domestic pre-tax return on revenues
Foreign pre-tax return on revenues
Total pre-tax return on revenues
2014
$ 1,267.3
750.3
$ 2,017.6
2013
$
827.0
868.0
$ 1,695.0
12.4%
8.6%
10.6%
10.2%
9.7%
9.9%
The higher income before income taxes and return on revenues for domestic operations were primarily due to
higher revenues from trucks and parts operations and higher truck margins. The lower income before income taxes
and pre-tax return on revenues for foreign operations were primarily due to lower revenues and truck margins in all
foreign markets, except Canada.
L I Q U I D I T Y A N D C A P I T A L R E S O U R C E S :
($ in millions)
At December 31,
Cash and cash equivalents
Marketable debt securities
2015
$ 2,016.4
1,448.1
$ 3,464.5
2014
2013
$ 1,737.6
1,272.0
$ 3,009.6
$ 1,750.1
1,267.5
$ 3,017.6
The Company’s total cash and marketable debt securities at December 31, 2015 increased $454.9 million from the
balances at December 31, 2014, primarily due to an increase in cash and cash equivalents.
The change in cash and cash equivalents is summarized below:
43
($ in millions)
Year Ended December 31,
Operating activities:
Net income
Net income items not affecting cash
Pension contributions
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net
Net cash provided by operating activities
Net cash used in investing activities
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the year
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the year
2015
2014
2013
$ 1,604.0
910.9
(62.9)
104.0
2,556.0
(1,974.9)
(196.5)
(105.8)
278.8
1,737.6
$ 2,016.4
$ 1,358.8
875.5
(81.1)
(29.6)
2,123.6
(1,531.9)
(520.5)
(83.7)
(12.5)
1,750.1
$ 1,737.6
$ 1,171.3
957.5
(26.2)
273.1
2,375.7
(2,151.0)
273.8
(20.8)
477.7
1,272.4
$ 1,750.1
2015 Compared to 2014:
Operating activities: Cash provided by operations increased $432.4 million to $2.56 billion in 2015 compared to
$2.12 billion in 2014. Higher operating cash flow reflects $245.2 million of higher net income and $253.8 million
from inventory as there was $64.3 million in net inventory reductions in 2015 vs. $189.5 million in net inventory
purchases in 2014. In addition, higher cash inflows reflects $176.6 million from accounts receivables as collections
exceeded sales in 2015 ($105.3 million) compared to sales exceeding collections in 2014 ($71.3 million). A lower
increase in Financial Services sales-type finance leases and dealer direct loans on new trucks also contributed $126.5
million. These cash inflows were partially offset by cash outflows of $414.9 million from accounts payable and
accrued expenses, where payments from goods and services exceeded purchases in 2015 ($162.6 million) compared
to purchases exceeding payments in 2014 ($252.3 million).
Investing activities: Cash used in investing activities of $1.97 billion in 2015 increased $443.0 million from the $1.53
billion used in 2014, primarily due to higher cash used in the acquisitions of equipment for operating leases of
$199.4 million, $169.7 million higher net purchases of marketable securities and $116.0 million in higher net
originations of retail loans and direct financing leases in 2015. These outflows were partially offset by higher
proceeds from asset disposals of $53.3 million.
Financing activities: Cash used in financing activities was $196.5 million in 2015 compared to $520.5 million in 2014.
The Company paid $680.5 million of dividends in 2015 compared to $623.8 million paid in 2014, an increase of
$56.7 million. In addition, the Company repurchased 3.8 million shares of common stock for $201.6 million in 2015
compared to .7 million shares for $42.7 million in 2014. In 2015, the Company issued $1.99 billion of term debt
and $250.7 million of commercial paper and short-term bank loans and repaid maturing term debt of $1.58 billion.
In 2014, the Company issued $1.65 billion of term debt and $349.1 million of commercial paper and short-term
bank loans and repaid maturing term debt of $1.88 billion. This resulted in cash provided by borrowing activities of
$663.8 million in 2015, $546.9 million higher than cash provided by borrowing activities of $116.9 million in 2014.
2014 Compared to 2013:
Operating activities: Cash provided by operations decreased $252.1 million to $2.12 billion in 2014 compared to
$2.38 billion in 2013. Lower operating cash flow reflects a higher increase in Financial Services segment wholesale
receivables of $150.3 million and a higher increase in net purchases of inventories of $149.9 million. In addition,
lower cash inflows resulted from a reduction in liabilities for residual value guarantees (RVG) and deferred revenues
of $138.7 million, primarily due to a lower volume of new RVG contracts compared to 2013, and $54.9 million in
higher pension contributions. These outflows were partially offset by $187.5 million of higher net income and $74.5
million of higher depreciation on property, plant and equipment.
44
Investing activities: Cash used in investing activities of $1.53 billion in 2014 decreased $619.1 million from the $2.15
billion used in 2013, primarily due to lower net new loan and lease originations of $257.0 million, lower payments
for property, plant and equipment of $212.4 million and lower cash used in the acquisitions of equipment for
operating leases of $123.1 million.
Financing activities: Cash used in financing activities was $520.5 million for 2014 compared to cash provided by
financing activities of $273.8 million in 2013. The Company paid $623.8 million of dividends in 2014 compared to
$283.1 million paid in 2013, an increase of $340.7 million. The higher dividends in 2014 reflect a special dividend
declared in 2013 and paid in early 2014. In 2013, there was no special dividend payment, as the 2012 special
dividend was declared and paid in 2012. The Company also repurchased .7 million shares of common stock for
$42.7 million in 2014. In 2014, the Company issued $1.65 billion in term debt and $349.1 million of commercial
paper and short-term bank loans and repaid term debt of $1.88 billion. In 2013, the Company issued $2.13 billion
in term debt and repaid term debt of $568.9 million and reduced its outstanding commercial paper and bank loans
by $1.04 billion. This resulted in cash provided by borrowing activities of $116.9 million, $409.0 million lower than
cash provided by borrowing activities of $525.9 million in 2013.
Credit Lines and Other:
The Company has line of credit arrangements of $3.43 billion, of which $3.26 billion were unused at December 31,
2015. Included in these arrangements are $3.0 billion of syndicated bank facilities, of which $1.0 billion expires in
June 2016, $1.0 billion expires in June 2019 and $1.0 billion expires in June 2020. The Company intends to replace
these credit facilities on or before expiration with facilities of similar amounts and duration. These credit facilities
are maintained primarily to provide backup liquidity for commercial paper borrowings and maturing medium-term
notes. There were no borrowings under the syndicated bank facilities for the year ended December 31, 2015.
On September 21, 2015, the Company completed the repurchase of $300.0 million of the Company’s common stock
under authorizations approved in December 2011. On September 23, 2015, PACCAR’s Board of Directors approved
the repurchase of an additional $300.0 million of the Company’s common stock, and as of December 31, 2015,
$136.3 million of shares have been repurchased pursuant to the 2015 authorization.
At December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company had cash and cash equivalents and marketable debt
securities of $1.82 billion and $1.60 billion, respectively, which are considered indefinitely reinvested in foreign
subsidiaries. The Company periodically repatriates foreign earnings that are not indefinitely reinvested. Dividends
paid by foreign subsidiaries to the U.S. parent were $.24 billion, $.24 billion and $.19 billion in 2015, 2014 and 2013,
respectively. The Company believes that its U.S. cash and cash equivalents and marketable debt securities, future
operating cash flow and access to the capital markets, along with periodic repatriation of foreign earnings, will be
sufficient to meet U.S. liquidity requirements.
Truck, Parts and Other
The Company provides funding for working capital, capital expenditures, R&D, dividends, stock repurchases and
other business initiatives and commitments primarily from cash provided by operations. Management expects this
method of funding to continue in the future.
Investments for property, plant and equipment in 2015 increased to $306.5 million from $220.8 million in 2014,
primarily due to higher investments by DAF in Europe and the construction of a new parts distribution center in
Renton, Washington. Over the past decade, the Company’s combined investments in worldwide capital projects and
R&D totaled $5.92 billion, which have significantly increased the operating capacity and efficiency of its facilities and
the competitive advantage of the Company’s premium products.
In 2016, capital investments are expected to be $325 to $375 million, and R&D is expected to be $240 to $270
million focused on enhanced aftermarket support, manufacturing facilities and new product development.
The Company conducts business in Spain, Italy, Portugal, Ireland, Greece, Russia, Ukraine and certain other
countries which have been experiencing significant financial stress, fiscal or political strain and the corresponding
potential default. The Company routinely monitors its financial exposure to global financial conditions, global
counterparties and operating environments. As of December 31, 2015, the Company had finance and trade
receivables in these countries of approximately 1% of consolidated total assets. In addition, the Company’s
exposures in these countries were insignificant for both derivative counterparty credit and marketable debt security
investments in corporate or sovereign government securities as of December 31, 2015.
45
Financial Services
The Company funds its financial services activities primarily from collections on existing finance receivables and
borrowings in the capital markets. The primary sources of borrowings in the capital markets are commercial paper
and medium-term notes issued in the public markets and, to a lesser extent, bank loans. An additional source of
funds is loans from other PACCAR companies.
The Company issues commercial paper for a portion of its funding in its Financial Services segment. Some of this
commercial paper is converted to fixed interest rate debt through the use of interest-rate swaps, which are used to
manage interest-rate risk.
In November 2015, the Company’s U.S. finance subsidiary, PACCAR Financial Corp. (PFC), filed a shelf registration
under the Securities Act of 1933. The total amount of medium-term notes outstanding for PFC as of December 31,
2015 was $4.40 billion. The registration expires in November 2018 and does not limit the principal amount of debt
securities that may be issued during that period.
As of December 31, 2015, the Company’s European finance subsidiary, PACCAR Financial Europe, had €269.0
million available for issuance under a €1.50 billion medium-term note program listed on the Professional Securities
Market of the London Stock Exchange. This program replaced an expiring program in the second quarter of 2015
and is renewable annually through the filing of new listing particulars.
In April 2011, PACCAR Financial Mexico (PFM) registered a 10.00 billion peso medium-term note and commercial
paper program with the Comision Nacional Bancaria y de Valores. The registration expires in April 2016 and limits
the amount of commercial paper (up to one year) to 5.00 billion pesos. At December 31, 2015, 8.04 billion pesos
remained available for issuance. PFM intends to file a new program in April 2016.
In the event of a future significant disruption in the financial markets, the Company may not be able to issue
replacement commercial paper. As a result, the Company is exposed to liquidity risk from the shorter maturity of
short-term borrowings paid to lenders compared to the longer timing of receivable collections from customers. The
Company believes its cash balances and investments, collections on existing finance receivables, syndicated bank lines
and current investment-grade credit ratings of A+/A1 will continue to provide it with sufficient resources and access
to capital markets at competitive interest rates and therefore contribute to the Company maintaining its liquidity
and financial stability. A decrease in these credit ratings could negatively impact the Company’s ability to access
capital markets at competitive interest rates and the Company’s ability to maintain liquidity and financial stability.
PACCAR believes its Financial Services companies will be able to continue funding receivables, servicing debt and
paying dividends through internally generated funds, access to public and private debt markets and lines of credit.
46
Commitments
The following summarizes the Company’s contractual cash commitments at December 31, 2015:
($ in millions)
Borrowings*
Purchase obligations
Interest on debt**
Operating leases
Other obligations
maturity
within 1 year
1-3 years
3-5 years
$ 4,236.6
177.4
69.9
23.2
44.5
$ 4,551.6
$ 3,652.9
56.9
82.5
18.9
10.6
$ 3,821.8
$
703.1
18.5
3.9
1.7
727.2
$
more than
5 years
$
$
1.4
7.3
8.7
total
$ 8,592.6
234.3
170.9
47.4
64.1
$ 9,109.3
* Commercial paper included in borrowings is at par value.
**
Interest on floating-rate debt is based on the applicable market rates at December 31, 2015.
Total cash commitments for borrowings and interest on term debt are $8.76 billion and were related to the Financial
Services segment. As described in Note I of the consolidated financial statements, borrowings consist primarily of
term notes and commercial paper issued by the Financial Services segment. The Company expects to fund its
maturing Financial Services debt obligations principally from funds provided by collections from customers on loans
and lease contracts, as well as from the proceeds of commercial paper and medium-term note borrowings. Purchase
obligations are the Company’s contractual commitments to acquire future production inventory and capital
equipment. Other obligations include deferred cash compensation.
The Company’s other commitments include the following at December 31, 2015:
commitment expiration
($ in millions)
within 1 year
1-3 years
3-5 years
Loan and lease commitments
Residual value guarantees
Letters of credit
$
$
634.7
284.0
15.2
933.9
$
$
325.6
1.4
327.0
$
$
75.8
75.8
more than
5 years
$
$
6.0
.1
6.1
total
$
634.7
691.4
16.7
$ 1,342.8
Loan and lease commitments are for funding new retail loan and lease contracts. Residual value guarantees
represent the Company’s commitment to acquire trucks at a guaranteed value if the customer decides to return the
truck at a specified date in the future.
I M P A C T O F E N V I R O N M E N T A L M A T T E R S :
The Company, its competitors and industry in general are subject to various domestic and foreign requirements
relating to the environment. The Company believes its policies, practices and procedures are designed to prevent
unreasonable risk of environmental damage and that its handling, use and disposal of hazardous or toxic substances
have been in accordance with environmental laws and regulations in effect at the time such use and disposal
occurred.
The Company is involved in various stages of investigations and cleanup actions in different countries related to
environmental matters. In certain of these matters, the Company has been designated as a “potentially responsible
party” by domestic and foreign environmental agencies. The Company has accrued the estimated costs to investigate
and complete cleanup actions where it is probable that the Company will incur such costs in the future. Expenditures
related to environmental activities in the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 were $2.0 million, $1.2
million and $2.3 million, respectively. Management expects that these matters will not have a significant effect on the
Company’s consolidated cash flow, liquidity or financial condition.
C R I T I C A L A C C O U N T I N G P O L I C I E S :
47
The Company’s significant accounting policies are disclosed in Note A of the consolidated financial statements. In
the preparation of the Company’s financial statements, in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles, management uses estimates and makes judgments and assumptions that affect asset and liability values
and the amounts reported as income and expense during the periods presented. The following are accounting
policies which, in the opinion of management, are particularly sensitive and which, if actual results are different
from estimates used by management, may have a material impact on the financial statements.
Operating Leases
Trucks sold pursuant to agreements accounted for as operating leases are disclosed in Note E of the consolidated
financial statements. In determining its estimate of the residual value of such vehicles, the Company considers the
length of the lease term, the truck model, the expected usage of the truck and anticipated market demand.
Operating lease terms generally range from three to five years. The resulting residual values on operating leases
generally range between 30% and 50% of original equipment cost. If the sales price of the trucks at the end of the
term of the agreement differs from the Company’s estimated residual value, a gain or loss will result.
Future market conditions, changes in government regulations and other factors outside the Company’s control could
impact the ultimate sales price of trucks returned under these contracts. Residual values are reviewed regularly and
adjusted if market conditions warrant. A decrease in the estimated equipment residual values would increase annual
depreciation expense over the remaining lease term.
During 2015, 2014 and 2013, market values on equipment returning upon operating lease maturity were generally
higher than the residual values on the equipment, resulting in a decrease in depreciation expense of $5.8 million,
$10.6 million and $4.4 million, respectively.
At December 31, 2015, the aggregate residual value of equipment on operating leases in the Financial Services
segment and residual value guarantee on trucks accounted for as operating leases in the Truck segment was $2.10
billion. A 10% decrease in used truck values worldwide, expected to persist over the remaining maturities of the
Company’s operating leases, would reduce residual value estimates and result in the Company recording an average
of approximately $52.6 million of additional depreciation per year.
Allowance for Credit Losses
The allowance for credit losses related to the Company’s loans and finance leases is disclosed in Note D of the
consolidated financial statements. The Company has developed a systematic methodology for determining the
allowance for credit losses for its two portfolio segments, retail and wholesale. The retail segment consists of retail
loans and direct and sales-type finance leases, net of unearned interest. The wholesale segment consists of truck
inventory financing loans to dealers that are collateralized by trucks and other collateral. The wholesale segment
generally has less risk than the retail segment. Wholesale receivables generally are shorter in duration than retail
receivables, and the Company requires periodic reporting of the wholesale dealer’s financial condition, conducts
periodic audits of the trucks being financed and in many cases, obtains guarantees or other security such as
dealership assets. In determining the allowance for credit losses, retail loans and finance leases are evaluated together
since they relate to a similar customer base, their contractual terms require regular payment of principal and interest,
generally over 36 to 60 months, and they are secured by the same type of collateral. The allowance for credit losses
consists of both specific and general reserves.
The Company individually evaluates certain finance receivables for impairment. Finance receivables that are
evaluated individually for impairment consist of all wholesale accounts and certain large retail accounts with past
due balances or otherwise determined to be at a higher risk of loss. A finance receivable is impaired if it is
considered probable the Company will be unable to collect all contractual interest and principal payments as
scheduled. In addition, all retail loans and leases which have been classified as TDRs and all customer accounts over
90 days past due are considered impaired. Generally, impaired accounts are on non-accrual status. Impaired
accounts classified as TDRs which have been performing for 90 consecutive days are placed on accrual status if it is
deemed probable that the Company will collect all principal and interest payments.
48
Impaired receivables are generally considered collateral dependent. Large balance retail and all wholesale impaired
receivables are individually evaluated to determine the appropriate reserve for losses. The determination of reserves
for large balance impaired receivables considers the fair value of the associated collateral. When the underlying
collateral fair value exceeds the Company’s recorded investment, no reserve is recorded. Small balance impaired
receivables with similar risk characteristics are evaluated as a separate pool to determine the appropriate reserve for
losses using the historical loss information discussed below.
The Company evaluates finance receivables that are not individually impaired on a collective basis and determines
the general allowance for credit losses for both retail and wholesale receivables based on historical loss information,
using past due account data and current market conditions. Information used includes assumptions regarding the
likelihood of collecting current and past due accounts, repossession rates, the recovery rate on the underlying
collateral based on used truck values and other pledged collateral or recourse. The Company has developed a range
of loss estimates for each of its country portfolios based on historical experience, taking into account loss frequency
and severity in both strong and weak truck market conditions. A projection is made of the range of estimated credit
losses inherent in the portfolio from which an amount is determined as probable based on current market conditions
and other factors impacting the creditworthiness of the Company’s borrowers and their ability to repay. After
determining the appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses, a provision for losses on finance receivables is
charged to income as necessary to reflect management’s estimate of incurred credit losses, net of recoveries, inherent
in the portfolio.
The adequacy of the allowance is evaluated quarterly based on the most recent past due account information and
current market conditions. As accounts become past due, the likelihood that they will not be fully collected
increases. The Company’s experience indicates the probability of not fully collecting past due accounts ranges
between 20% and 70%. Over the past three years, the Company’s year-end 30+ days past due accounts were .5% of
loan and lease receivables. Historically, a 100 basis point increase in the 30+ days past due percentage has resulted
in an increase in credit losses of 5 to 30 basis points of receivables. At December 31, 2015, 30+ days past dues were
.5%. If past dues were 100 basis points higher or 1.5% as of December 31, 2015, the Company’s estimate of credit
losses would likely have increased by a range of $5 to $25 million depending on the extent of the past dues, the
estimated value of the collateral as compared to amounts owed and general economic factors.
Product Warranty
Product warranty is disclosed in Note H of the consolidated financial statements. The expenses related to product
warranty are estimated and recorded at the time products are sold based on historical and current data and
reasonable expectations for the future regarding the frequency and cost of warranty claims, net of recoveries.
Management takes actions to minimize warranty costs through quality-improvement programs; however, actual
claim costs incurred could materially differ from the estimated amounts and require adjustments to the reserve.
Historically those adjustments have not been material. Over the past three years, warranty expense as a percentage
of Truck, Parts and Other net sales and revenues has ranged between 1.4% and 1.8%. If the 2015 warranty expense
had been .2% higher as a percentage of net sales and revenues in 2015, warranty expense would have increased by
approximately $36 million.
Pension Benefits
Employee benefits are disclosed in Note L of the consolidated financial statements. The Company’s accounting for
employee pension benefit costs and obligations is based on management assumptions about the future used by
actuaries to estimate net costs and liabilities. These assumptions include discount rates, long-term rates of return on
plan assets, inflation rates, retirement rates, mortality rates and other factors. Management bases these assumptions
on historical results, the current environment and reasonable estimates of future events.
The discount rate for pension benefits is based on market interest rates of high-quality corporate bonds with a
maturity profile that matches the timing of the projected benefit payments of the plans. Changes in the discount
rate affect the valuation of the plan benefits obligation and funded status of the plans. The long-term rate of return
on plan assets is based on projected returns for each asset class and relative weighting of those asset classes in the
plans.
Because differences between actual results and the assumptions for returns on plan assets, retirement rates and
mortality rates are accumulated and amortized into expense over future periods, management does not believe these
differences or a typical percentage change in these assumptions worldwide would have a material effect on its
financial results in the next year. The most significant assumption which could negatively affect pension expense is a
decrease in the discount rate. If the discount rate were to decrease .5%, 2015 net pension expense would increase to
$107.6 million from $85.0 million and the projected benefit obligation would increase $207.2 million to $2.5 billion
from $2.3 billion.
49
Income Taxes
Income taxes are disclosed in Note M of the consolidated financial statements. The Company calculates income tax
expense on pre-tax income based on current tax law. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for future tax
consequences on temporary differences between recorded amounts in the financial statements and their respective
tax basis. The determination of income tax expense requires management estimates and involves judgment
regarding indefinitely reinvested foreign earnings, jurisdictional mix of earnings and future outcomes regarding tax
law issues included in tax returns. The Company updates its assumptions on all of these factors each quarter as well
as new information on tax laws and differences between estimated taxes and actual returns when filed. If the
Company’s assessment of these matters changes, the effect is accounted for in earnings in the period the change is
made.
F O R W A R D - L O O K I N G S T A T E M E N T S :
This report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include statements relating to future results of operations or financial
position and any other statement that does not relate to any historical or current fact. Such statements are based on
currently available operating, financial and other information and are subject to risks and uncertainties that may
affect actual results. Risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to: a significant decline in industry sales;
competitive pressures; reduced market share; reduced availability of or higher prices for fuel; increased safety,
emissions, or other regulations resulting in higher costs and/or sales restrictions; currency or commodity price
fluctuations; lower used truck prices; insufficient or under-utilization of manufacturing capacity; supplier
interruptions; insufficient liquidity in the capital markets; fluctuations in interest rates; changes in the levels of the
Financial Services segment new business volume due to unit fluctuations in new PACCAR truck sales or reduced
market shares; changes affecting the profitability of truck owners and operators; price changes impacting truck sales
prices and residual values; insufficient supplier capacity or access to raw materials; labor disruptions; shortages of
commercial truck drivers; increased warranty costs or litigation; or legislative and governmental regulations. A more
detailed description of these and other risks is included under the heading Part 1, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in the
Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.
C O N S O L I D A T E D S T A T E M E N T S O F I N C O M E
50
Year Ended December 31,
TRUCK, PARTS AND OTHER:
Net sales and revenues
Cost of sales and revenues
Research and development
Selling, general and administrative
Interest and other expense, net
Truck, Parts and Other Income Before Income Taxes
FINANCIAL SERVICES:
Interest and fees
Operating lease, rental and other revenues
Revenues
Interest and other borrowing expenses
Depreciation and other expenses
Selling, general and administrative
Provision for losses on receivables
Financial Services Income Before Income Taxes
Investment income
Total Income Before Income Taxes
Income taxes
Net Income
Net Income Per Share
Basic
Diluted
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding
Basic
Diluted
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
2015
2014
2013
(millions, except per share data)
$ 17,942.8
$ 17,792.8
$ 15,948.9
15,292.1
239.8
445.9
12.3
15,990.1
1,952.7
443.8
728.5
1,172.3
118.0
583.7
95.6
12.4
809.7
362.6
15,481.6
215.6
465.2
5.5
16,167.9
1,624.9
462.6
741.6
1,204.2
133.7
588.5
96.2
15.4
833.8
370.4
13,900.7
251.4
465.3
5.3
14,622.7
1,326.2
462.8
712.1
1,174.9
155.9
571.7
94.2
12.9
834.7
340.2
21.8
2,337.1
733.1
$ 1,604.0
22.3
2,017.6
658.8
$ 1,358.8
28.6
1,695.0
523.7
$ 1,171.3
$
$
4.52
4.51
$
$
3.83
3.82
$
$
3.31
3.30
354.6
355.6
355.0
356.1
354.2
355.2
C O N S O L I D A T E D S T A T E M E N T S O F C O M P R E H E N S I V E I N C O M E
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2013
51
Net income
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Unrealized gains (losses) on derivative contracts
Gains arising during the period
Tax effect
Reclassification adjustment
Tax effect
Unrealized (losses) gains on marketable debt securities
Net holding (loss) gain
Tax effect
Reclassification adjustment
Tax effect
Pension plans
Gains (losses) arising during the period
Tax effect
Reclassification adjustment
Tax effect
Foreign currency translation losses
Net other comprehensive (loss) income
Comprehensive Income
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
$ 1,604.0
(millions)
$ 1,358.8
$ 1,171.3
38.7
(10.8)
(29.3)
8.5
7.1
(2.3)
.6
(2.1)
.6
(3.2)
17.7
(2.6)
42.4
(14.8)
42.7
(483.8)
(437.2)
$ 1,166.8
$
26.1
(6.1)
(23.5)
5.1
1.6
5.5
(1.3)
(.9)
.3
3.6
(291.1)
105.3
22.0
(7.1)
(170.9)
(422.8)
(588.5)
770.3
53.2
(16.3)
(35.6)
10.8
12.1
(8.3)
2.2
1.7
(.5)
(4.9)
324.9
(120.1)
45.3
(15.8)
234.3
(73.3)
168.2
$ 1,339.5
C O N S O L I D A T E D B A L A N C E S H E E T S
52
A S S E T S
December 31,
TRUCK, PARTS AND OTHER:
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents
Trade and other receivables, net
Marketable debt securities
Inventories, net
Other current assets
Total Truck, Parts and Other Current Assets
Equipment on operating leases, net
Property, plant and equipment, net
Other noncurrent assets, net
Total Truck, Parts and Other Assets
FINANCIAL SERVICES:
Cash and cash equivalents
Finance and other receivables, net
Equipment on operating leases, net
Other assets
Total Financial Services Assets
2015
2014
(millions)
$ 1,929.9
879.0
1,448.1
796.5
245.7
5,299.2
992.2
2,176.4
387.4
8,855.2
86.5
9,303.6
2,380.8
483.7
12,254.6
$ 21,109.8
$ 1,665.1
1,047.1
1,272.0
925.7
290.5
5,200.4
934.5
2,313.3
253.3
8,701.5
72.5
9,042.6
2,306.0
496.2
11,917.3
$ 20,618.8
L I A B I L I T I E S A N D S T O C K H O L D E R S ’ E Q U I T Y
December 31,
TRUCK, PARTS AND OTHER:
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other
Dividend payable
Total Truck, Parts and Other Current Liabilities
Residual value guarantees and deferred revenues
Other liabilities
Total Truck, Parts and Other Liabilities
FINANCIAL SERVICES:
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other
Commercial paper and bank loans
Term notes
Deferred taxes and other liabilities
Total Financial Services Liabilities
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Preferred stock, no par value - authorized 1.0 million shares, none issued
Common stock, $1 par value - authorized 1.2 billion shares;
issued 351.3 million and 355.2 million shares
Additional paid-in capital
Treasury stock, at cost - nil and .7 million shares
Retained earnings
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
Total Stockholders’ Equity
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
2015
2014
(millions)
53
$ 2,071.7
492.6
2,564.3
1,047.4
720.2
4,331.9
356.9
2,796.5
5,795.0
889.1
9,837.5
$ 2,297.2
354.4
2,651.6
970.9
718.8
4,341.3
384.5
2,641.9
5,588.7
909.2
9,524.3
351.3
69.3
7,536.8
(1,017.0)
6,940.4
$ 21,109.8
355.2
156.7
(42.7)
6,863.8
(579.8)
6,753.2
$ 20,618.8
C O N S O L I D A T E D S T A T E M E N T S O F C A S H F L O W S
54
Year Ended December 31,
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Income
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operations:
Depreciation and amortization:
Property, plant and equipment
Equipment on operating leases and other
Provision for losses on financial services receivables
Deferred taxes
Other, net
Pension contributions
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease (increase) in assets other than cash and cash equivalents:
Receivables:
Trade and other receivables
Wholesale receivables on new trucks
Sales-type finance leases and dealer direct loans on new trucks
Inventories
Other assets, net
(Decrease) increase in liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
Residual value guarantees and deferred revenues
Other liabilities, net
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Originations of retail loans and direct financing leases
Collections on retail loans and direct financing leases
Net (increase) decrease in wholesale receivables on used equipment
Purchases of marketable debt securities
Proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable debt securities
Payments for property, plant and equipment
Acquisitions of equipment for operating leases
Proceeds from asset disposals
Other, net
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities
2015
2014
(millions)
2013
$ 1,604.0
$ 1,358.8
$ 1,171.3
292.2
614.9
12.4
(55.2)
46.6
(62.9)
105.3
(273.4)
(6.6)
64.3
(125.1)
(162.6)
242.0
260.1
2,556.0
(3,064.5)
2,681.9
(24.7)
(1,329.8)
1,035.5
(286.7)
(1,438.5)
448.8
3.1
(1,974.9)
285.2
632.5
15.4
(98.0)
40.4
(81.1)
(71.3)
(232.8)
(133.1)
(189.5)
(72.0)
252.3
123.1
293.7
2,123.6
(3,114.2)
2,847.6
1.1
(1,122.5)
997.9
(298.2)
(1,239.1)
395.5
210.7
600.0
12.9
97.3
36.6
(26.2)
(115.0)
(82.5)
(101.9)
(39.6)
(86.9)
240.8
261.8
196.4
2,375.7
(2,992.8)
2,469.2
6.5
(990.1)
888.9
(510.6)
(1,362.2)
340.1
(1,531.9)
(2,151.0)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Payments of cash dividends
Purchases of treasury stock
Proceeds from stock compensation transactions
Net increase (decrease) in commercial paper and short-term bank loans
Proceeds from term debt
Payments on term debt
Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
(680.5)
(201.6)
21.8
250.7
1,993.2
(1,580.1)
(196.5)
(105.8)
278.8
1,737.6
$ 2,016.4
(623.8)
(42.7)
29.1
349.1
1,650.8
(1,883.0)
(520.5)
(83.7)
(12.5)
1,750.1
$ 1,737.6
(283.1)
31.0
(1,039.3)
2,134.1
(568.9)
273.8
(20.8)
477.7
1,272.4
$ 1,750.1
C O N S O L I D A T E D S T A T E M E N T S O F S T O C K H O L D E R S ’ E Q U I T Y
December 31,
COMMON STOCK, $1 PAR VALUE:
Balance at beginning of year
Treasury stock retirement
Stock compensation
Balance at end of year
ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL:
Balance at beginning of year
Treasury stock retirement
Stock compensation and tax benefit
Balance at end of year
TREASURY STOCK, AT COST:
Balance at beginning of year
Purchases, shares: 2015 - 3.85; 2014 - .73; 2013 - nil
Retirements
Balance at end of year
RETAINED EARNINGS:
Balance at beginning of year
Net income
Cash dividends declared on common stock,
per share: 2015 - $2.32; 2014 - $1.86; 2013 - $1.70
Treasury stock retirement
Balance at end of year
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME:
Balance at beginning of year
Other comprehensive (loss) income
Balance at end of year
Total Stockholders’ Equity
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
2015
2014
2013
55
(millions, except per share data)
$
355.2
(4.6)
.7
351.3
156.7
(128.5)
41.1
69.3
(42.7)
(201.6)
244.3
6,863.8
1,604.0
(819.8)
(111.2)
7,536.8
$
354.3
$
353.4
.9
354.3
56.6
49.6
106.2
.9
355.2
106.2
50.5
156.7
(42.7)
(42.7)
6,165.1
1,358.8
5,596.4
1,171.3
(660.1)
(602.6)
6,863.8
6,165.1
(579.8)
(437.2)
(1,017.0)
$ 6,940.4
8.7
(588.5)
(579.8)
$ 6,753.2
(159.5)
168.2
8.7
$ 6,634.3
56
A .
S I G N I F I C A N T A C C O U N T I N G P O L I C I E S
Description of Operations: PACCAR Inc (the Company or PACCAR) is a multinational company operating in
three principal segments: (1) the Truck segment includes the design and manufacture of high-quality, light-,
medium- and heavy-duty commercial trucks; (2) the Parts segment includes the distribution of aftermarket parts
for trucks and related commercial vehicles; and (3) the Financial Services segment (PFS) includes finance and
leasing products and services provided to customers and dealers. PACCAR’s finance and leasing activities are
principally related to PACCAR products and associated equipment. PACCAR’s sales and revenues are derived
primarily from North America and Europe. The Company also operates in Australia and Brasil and sells trucks
and parts to customers in Asia, Africa, Middle East and South America.
Principles of Consolidation: The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its
wholly owned domestic and foreign subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are
eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the
financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Revenue Recognition:
Truck, Parts and Other: Substantially all sales and revenues of trucks and related aftermarket parts are recorded by
the Company when products are shipped to dealers or customers, except for certain truck shipments that are
subject to a residual value guarantee to the customer. Revenues related to these shipments are generally recognized
on a straight-line basis over the guarantee period (see Note E). At the time certain truck and parts sales to a dealer
are recognized, the Company records an estimate of any future sales incentive costs related to such sales. The
estimate is based on historical data and announced incentive programs. In the Truck and Parts segments, the
Company grants extended payment terms on selected receivables. Interest is charged for the period beyond
standard payment terms. Interest income is recorded as earned.
Financial Services: Interest income from finance and other receivables is recognized using the interest method.
Certain loan origination costs are deferred and amortized to interest income over the expected life of the
contracts, generally 36 to 60 months, using the straight-line method which approximates the interest method. For
operating leases, rental revenue is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Rental revenues for the
years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 were $668.6, $681.5 and $631.7, respectively. Depreciation and
related leased unit operating expenses were $536.2, $544.0 and $503.5 for the years ended December 31, 2015,
2014 and 2013, respectively.
Recognition of interest income and rental revenue is suspended (put on non-accrual status) when the receivable
becomes more than 90 days past the contractual due date or earlier if some other event causes the Company to
determine that collection is not probable. Accordingly, no finance receivables more than 90 days past due were
accruing interest at December 31, 2015 or December 31, 2014. Recognition is resumed if the receivable becomes
current by the payment of all amounts due under the terms of the existing contract and collection of remaining
amounts is considered probable (if not contractually modified) or if the customer makes scheduled payments for
three months and collection of remaining amounts is considered probable (if contractually modified). Payments
received while the finance receivable is on non-accrual status are applied to interest and principal in accordance
with the contractual terms.
Cash and Cash Equivalents: Cash equivalents consist of liquid investments with a maturity at date of purchase of
90 days or less.
Marketable Debt Securities: The Company’s investments in marketable debt securities are classified as available-
for-sale. These investments are stated at fair value with any unrealized gains or losses, net of tax, included as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (AOCI).
The Company utilizes third-party pricing services for all of its marketable debt security valuations. The Company
reviews the pricing methodology used by the third party pricing services, including the manner employed to collect
market information. On a quarterly basis, the Company also performs review and validation procedures on the
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions) pricing information received from the third party providers. These procedures help ensure that the fair value
information used by the Company is determined in accordance with applicable accounting guidance.
57
The Company evaluates its investment in marketable debt securities at the end of each reporting period to
determine if a decline in fair value is other than temporary. Realized losses are recognized upon management’s
determination that a decline in fair value is other than temporary. The determination of other-than-temporary
impairment is a subjective process, requiring the use of judgments and assumptions regarding the amount and
timing of recovery. The Company reviews and evaluates its investments at least quarterly to identify investments
that have indications of other-than-temporary impairments. It is reasonably possible that a change in estimate
could occur in the near term relating to other-than-temporary impairment. Accordingly, the Company considers
several factors when evaluating debt securities for other-than-temporary impairment, including whether the decline
in fair value of the security is due to increased default risk for the specific issuer or market interest-rate risk.
In assessing default risk, the Company considers the collectability of principal and interest payments by monitoring
changes to issuers’ credit ratings, specific credit events associated with individual issuers as well as the credit ratings
of any financial guarantor, and the extent and duration to which amortized cost exceeds fair value.
In assessing market interest-rate risk, including benchmark interest rates and credit spreads, the Company considers
its intent for selling the securities and whether it is more likely than not the Company will be able to hold these
securities until the recovery of any unrealized losses.
Receivables:
Trade and Other Receivables: The Company’s trade and other receivables are recorded at cost, net of
allowances. At December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, trade and other receivables include trade receivables
from dealers and customers of $739.2 and $882.2 and other receivables of $139.8 and $165.0 relating primarily
to value added tax receivables and supplier allowances and rebates.
Finance and Other Receivables:
Loans – Loans represent fixed or floating-rate loans to customers collateralized by the vehicles purchased and
are recorded at amortized cost.
Finance leases – Finance leases are retail direct financing leases and sales-type finance leases, which lease
equipment to retail customers and dealers. These leases are reported as the sum of minimum lease payments
receivable and estimated residual value of the property subject to the contracts, reduced by unearned interest
which is shown separately.
Dealer wholesale financing – Dealer wholesale financing is floating-rate wholesale loans to PACCAR dealers for new
and used trucks and are recorded at amortized cost. The loans are collateralized by the trucks being financed.
Operating lease receivables and other – Operating lease receivables and other include monthly rentals due on
operating leases, unamortized loan and lease origination costs, interest on loans and other amounts due within
one year in the normal course of business.
Allowance for Credit Losses:
Truck, Parts and Other: The Company historically has not experienced significant losses or past due amounts on
trade and other receivables in its Truck, Parts and Other businesses. Accounts are considered past due once the
unpaid balance is over 30 days outstanding based on contractual payment terms. Accounts are charged-off
against the allowance for credit losses when, in the judgment of management, they are considered uncollectible.
The allowance for credit losses for Truck, Parts and Other was $1.3 and $1.9 for the years ended December 31,
2015 and 2014, respectively. Net charge-offs were $.3, $.2 and $.2 for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014
and 2013, respectively.
Financial Services: The Company continuously monitors the payment performance of its finance receivables.
For large retail finance customers and dealers with wholesale financing, the Company regularly reviews their
financial statements and makes site visits and phone contact as appropriate. If the Company becomes aware
of circumstances that could cause those customers or dealers to face financial difficulty, whether or not they
are past due, the customers are placed on a watch list.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions) 58
The Company modifies loans and finance leases in the normal course of its Financial Services operations. The
Company may modify loans and finance leases for commercial reasons or for credit reasons. Modifications for
commercial reasons are changes to contract terms for customers that are not considered to be in financial
difficulty. Insignificant delays are modifications extending terms up to three months for customers experiencing
some short-term financial stress, but not considered to be in financial difficulty. Modifications for credit reasons
are changes to contract terms for customers considered to be in financial difficulty. The Company’s modifications
typically result in granting more time to pay the contractual amounts owed and charging a fee and interest for the
term of the modification.
When considering whether to modify customer accounts for credit reasons, the Company evaluates the
creditworthiness of the customers and modifies those accounts that the Company considers likely to perform under
the modified terms. When the Company modifies loans and finance leases for credit reasons and grants a
concession, the modifications are classified as troubled debt restructurings (TDR). The Company does not typically
grant credit modifications for customers that do not meet minimum underwriting standards since the Company
normally repossesses the financed equipment in these circumstances. When such modifications do occur, they are
considered TDRs.
On average, modifications extended contractual terms by approximately seven months in 2015 and five months in
2014 and did not have a significant effect on the weighted average term or interest rate of the total portfolio at
December 31, 2015 and 2014.
The Company has developed a systematic methodology for determining the allowance for credit losses for its two
portfolio segments, retail and wholesale. The retail segment consists of retail loans and direct and sales-type finance
leases, net of unearned interest. The wholesale segment consists of truck inventory financing loans to dealers that
are collateralized by trucks and other collateral. The wholesale segment generally has less risk than the retail
segment. Wholesale receivables generally are shorter in duration than retail receivables, and the Company requires
periodic reporting of the wholesale dealer’s financial condition, conducts periodic audits of the trucks being financed
and in many cases, obtains guarantees or other security such as dealership assets. In determining the allowance for
credit losses, retail loans and finance leases are evaluated together since they relate to a similar customer base, their
contractual terms require regular payment of principal and interest, generally over 36 to 60 months, and they are
secured by the same type of collateral. The allowance for credit losses consists of both specific and general reserves.
The Company individually evaluates certain finance receivables for impairment. Finance receivables that are
evaluated individually for impairment consist of all wholesale accounts and certain large retail accounts with past
due balances or otherwise determined to be at a higher risk of loss. A finance receivable is impaired if it is
considered probable the Company will be unable to collect all contractual interest and principal payments as
scheduled. In addition, all retail loans and leases which have been classified as TDRs and all customer accounts over
90 days past due are considered impaired. Generally, impaired accounts are on non-accrual status. Impaired
accounts classified as TDRs which have been performing for 90 consecutive days are placed on accrual status if it is
deemed probable that the Company will collect all principal and interest payments.
Impaired receivables are generally considered collateral dependent. Large balance retail and all wholesale impaired
receivables are individually evaluated to determine the appropriate reserve for losses. The determination of reserves
for large balance impaired receivables considers the fair value of the associated collateral. When the underlying
collateral fair value exceeds the Company’s recorded investment, no reserve is recorded. Small balance impaired
receivables with similar risk characteristics are evaluated as a separate pool to determine the appropriate reserve for
losses using the historical loss information discussed below.
The Company evaluates finance receivables that are not individually impaired on a collective basis and determines
the general allowance for credit losses for both retail and wholesale receivables based on historical loss information,
using past due account data and current market conditions. Information used includes assumptions regarding the
likelihood of collecting current and past due accounts, repossession rates, the recovery rate on the underlying
collateral based on used truck values and other pledged collateral or recourse. The Company has developed a range
of loss estimates for each of its country portfolios based on historical experience, taking into account loss frequency
and severity in both strong and weak truck market conditions. A projection is made of the range of estimated credit
losses inherent in the portfolio from which an amount is determined as probable based on current market conditions
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions) and other factors impacting the creditworthiness of the Company’s borrowers and their ability to repay. After
determining the appropriate level of the allowance for credit losses, a provision for losses on finance receivables is
charged to income as necessary to reflect management’s estimate of incurred credit losses, net of recoveries, inherent
in the portfolio.
59
In determining the fair value of the collateral, the Company uses a pricing matrix and categorizes the fair value as
Level 2 in the hierarchy of fair value measurement. The pricing matrix is reviewed quarterly and updated as
appropriate. The pricing matrix considers the make, model and year of the equipment as well as recent sales prices
of comparable equipment through wholesale channels to the Company’s dealers (principal market). The fair value
of the collateral also considers the overall condition of the equipment.
Accounts are charged-off against the allowance for credit losses when, in the judgment of management, they are
considered uncollectible, which generally occurs upon repossession of the collateral. Typically the timing between
the repossession and charge-off is not significant. In cases where repossession is delayed (e.g., for legal proceedings),
the Company records a partial charge-off. The charge-off is determined by comparing the fair value of the collateral,
less cost to sell, to the recorded investment.
Inventories: Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost of inventories in the U.S. is determined
principally by the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method. Cost of all other inventories is determined principally by the
first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Cost of sales and revenues include shipping and handling costs incurred to
deliver products to dealers and customers.
Equipment on Operating Leases: The Company’s Financial Services segment leases equipment under operating
leases to its customers. In addition, in the Truck segment, equipment sold to customers in Europe subject to a
residual value guarantee (RVG) by the Company is generally accounted for as an operating lease. Equipment is
recorded at cost and is depreciated on the straight-line basis to the lower of the estimated residual value or
guarantee value. Lease and guarantee periods generally range from three to five years. Estimated useful lives of the
equipment range from four to nine years. The Company reviews residual values of equipment on operating leases
periodically to determine that recorded amounts are appropriate.
Property, Plant and Equipment: Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed
principally by the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the various classes of assets. Certain
production tooling is amortized on a unit of production basis.
Long-lived Assets and Goodwill: The Company evaluates the carrying value of property, plant and equipment
when events and circumstances warrant a review. Goodwill is tested for impairment at least on an annual basis.
There were no impairment charges for the three years ended December 31, 2015. Goodwill was $105.6 and $128.6
at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The decrease in value was mostly due to currency translation.
Product Support Liabilities: Product support liabilities are estimated future payments related to product
warranties, optional extended warranties and repair and maintenance (R&M) contracts. The Company generally
offers one year warranties covering most of its vehicles and related aftermarket parts. For vehicles equipped with
engines manufactured by PACCAR, the Company generally offers two year warranties on the engine. Specific
terms and conditions vary depending on the product and the country of sale. Optional extended warranty and
R&M contracts can be purchased for periods which generally range up to five years. Warranty expenses and
reserves are estimated and recorded at the time products or contracts are sold based on historical data regarding
the source, frequency and cost of claims, net of any recoveries. The Company periodically assesses the adequacy of
its recorded liabilities and adjusts them as appropriate to reflect actual experience. Revenue from extended
warranty and R&M contracts is deferred and recognized to income generally on a straight-line basis over the
contract period. Warranty and R&M costs on these contracts are recognized as incurred.
Derivative Financial Instruments: As part of its risk management strategy, the Company enters into derivative
contracts to hedge against interest rates and foreign currency risk. Certain derivative instruments designated as
either cash flow hedges or fair value hedges are subject to hedge accounting. Derivative instruments that are not
subject to hedge accounting are held as economic hedges. The Company’s policies prohibit the use of derivatives
for speculation or trading. At the inception of each hedge relationship, the Company documents its risk
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions) 60
management objectives, procedures and accounting treatment. All of the Company’s interest-rate and certain
foreign-exchange contracts are transacted under International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) master
agreements. Each agreement permits the net settlement of amounts owed in the event of default and certain other
termination events. For derivative financial instruments, the Company has elected not to offset derivative positions
in the balance sheet with the same counterparty under the same agreements and is not required to post or receive
collateral. Exposure limits and minimum credit ratings are used to minimize the risks of counterparty default. The
Company’s maximum exposure to potential default of its swap counterparties is limited to the asset position of its
swap portfolio. The asset position of the Company’s swap portfolio is $132.2 at December 31, 2015.
The Company uses regression analysis to assess effectiveness of interest-rate contracts on a quarterly basis. For
foreign-exchange contracts, the Company performs quarterly assessments to ensure that critical terms continue to
match. All components of the derivative instrument’s gain or loss are included in the assessment of hedge
effectiveness. Gains or losses on the ineffective portion of cash flow hedges are recognized currently in earnings.
Hedge accounting is discontinued prospectively when the Company determines that a derivative financial
instrument has ceased to be a highly effective hedge.
Foreign Currency Translation: For most of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries, the local currency is the functional
currency. All assets and liabilities are translated at year-end exchange rates and all income statement amounts are
translated at the weighted average rates for the period. Translation adjustments are recorded in AOCI. The
Company uses the U.S. dollar as the functional currency for all but one of its Mexican subsidiaries, which uses the
local currency. For the U.S. functional currency entities in Mexico, inventories, cost of sales, property, plant and
equipment and depreciation are remeasured at historical rates and resulting adjustments are included in net
income.
Earnings per Share: Basic earnings per common share are computed by dividing earnings by the weighted average
number of common shares outstanding, plus the effect of any participating securities. Diluted earnings per
common share are computed assuming that all potentially dilutive securities are converted into common shares
under the treasury stock method.
New Accounting Pronouncements: In January 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-1, Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and
Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The amendment in this ASU addresses the recognition,
measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. The ASU is effective for annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those annual periods. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact on its consolidated financial statements.
In November 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred
Taxes. This ASU simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes by requiring all deferred tax assets and
liabilities be classified as noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. The amendment may be applied either
prospectively or retrospectively to all periods presented. This ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2016, and early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2015-17 prospectively as of
December 31, 2015, accordingly, prior period deferred income tax assets and liabilities were not adjusted.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This ASU amends the existing
accounting standards for revenue recognition. Under the new revenue recognition model, a company should
recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the
consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In July 2015,
the FASB deferred the effective date of this ASU by one year to annual reporting periods beginning after December
15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is permitted, but no sooner than
the original effective date of annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The amendment may
be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as
of the date of initial application. The Company is currently evaluating the transition alternatives and impact on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions) The FASB also issued the following standards, none of which are expected to have a material impact on the
Company’s consolidated financial statements.
61
standard
description
2015-11
Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory.
Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosures for Investments in Certain
Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent).
Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40):
Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement.
effective date*
January 1, 2017
January 1, 2016
January 1, 2016
Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation
of Debt Issuance Costs.
January 1, 2016
Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent
Measure of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements.
January 1, 2016
Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based
Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target
Could Be Achieved After the Requisite Service Period.
January 1, 2016
2015-07
2015-05
2015-03
2015-15
2014-12
* The Company expects to adopt on the effective date.
B .
I N V E S T M E N T S I N M A R K E T A B L E D E B T S E C U R I T I E S
Marketable debt securities consisted of the following at December 31:
2015
U.S. tax-exempt securities
U.S. corporate securities
U.S. government and agency securities
Non-U.S. corporate securities
Non-U.S. government securities
Other debt securities
2014
U.S. tax-exempt securities
U.S. corporate securities
U.S. government and agency securities
Non-U.S. corporate securities
Non-U.S. government securities
Other debt securities
amortized
cost
$
505.0
76.7
15.7
585.6
192.7
69.6
$ 1,445.3
amortized
cost
$
362.9
80.9
8.0
528.1
192.1
92.8
$ 1,264.8
unrealized
gains
unrealized
losses
$
$
.7
.1
.1
1.8
1.1
.1
3.9
unrealized
gains
$
$
.8
.6
3.9
2.0
.3
7.6
$
$
.3
.1
.1
.4
.1
.1
1.1
unrealized
losses
$
.3
.1
.4
$
fair
value
$
505.4
76.7
15.7
587.0
193.7
69.6
$ 1,448.1
fair
value
$
363.4
81.5
8.0
532.0
194.1
93.0
$ 1,272.0
The cost of marketable debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to
maturity. Amortization, accretion, interest and dividend income and realized gains and losses are included in
investment income. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method. Gross realized gains
were $2.6, $1.2 and $2.0, and gross realized losses were $.8, $.1 and $.7 for the years ended December 31, 2015,
2014 and 2013, respectively.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions)
62
Marketable debt securities with continuous unrealized losses and their related fair values were as follows:
At December 31,
2015
2014
Fair value
Unrealized losses
twelve months
or greater
less than
twelve months
579.0
1.1
$
twelve months
or greater
less than
twelve months
249.6
.4
$
For the investment securities in gross unrealized loss positions identified above, the Company does not intend to
sell the investment securities. It is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell the
investment securities before recovery of the unrealized losses, and the Company expects that the contractual
principal and interest will be received on the investment securities. As a result, the Company recognized no other-
than-temporary impairments during the periods presented.
Contractual maturities at December 31, 2015 were as follows:
Maturities:
Within one year
One to five years
Six to ten years
C .
I N V E N T O R I E S
Inventories include the following:
At December 31,
Finished products
Work in process and raw materials
Less LIFO reserve
amortized
cost
$
437.1
1,008.0
.2
$ 1,445.3
fair
value
$
437.4
1,010.5
.2
$ 1,448.1
2015
443.6
528.9
972.5
(176.0)
796.5
$
$
2014
512.3
587.7
1,100.0
(174.3)
925.7
$
$
Inventories valued using the LIFO method comprised 52% and 47% of consolidated inventories before deducting
the LIFO reserve at both December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
D .
F I N A N C E A N D O T H E R R E C E I V A B L E S
Finance and other receivables include the following:
At December 31,
Loans
Direct financing leases
Sales-type finance leases
Dealer wholesale financing
Operating lease receivables and other
Unearned interest: Finance leases
Less allowance for losses:
Loans and leases
Dealer wholesale financing
Operating lease receivables and other
2015
$ 4,011.7
2,719.5
969.8
1,950.1
131.9
(364.6)
$ 9,418.4
(99.2)
(7.3)
(8.3)
$ 9,303.6
2014
$ 3,968.5
2,752.8
972.8
1,755.8
99.5
(384.8)
$ 9,164.6
(105.5)
(9.0)
(7.5)
$ 9,042.6
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions)
The net activity of sales-type finance leases, dealer direct loans and dealer wholesale financing on new trucks is
shown in the operating section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows since those receivables finance the
sale of Company inventory.
63
Annual minimum payments due on finance receivables are as follows:
Beginning January 1, 2016
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
Thereafter
loans
$ 1,238.4
1,049.7
806.5
544.3
331.7
41.1
$ 4,011.7
finance
leases
$ 1,083.3
883.7
672.3
465.4
261.9
112.9
$ 3,479.5
Estimated residual values included with finance leases amounted to $209.8 in 2015 and $204.0 in 2014. Experience
indicates substantially all of dealer wholesale financing will be repaid within one year. In addition, repayment
experience indicates that some loans, leases and other finance receivables will be paid prior to contract maturity,
while others may be extended or modified.
For the following credit quality disclosures, finance receivables are classified into two portfolio segments, wholesale
and retail. The retail portfolio is further segmented into dealer retail and customer retail. The dealer wholesale
segment consists of truck inventory financing to PACCAR dealers. The dealer retail segment consists of loans and
leases to participating dealers and franchises that use the proceeds to fund customers’ acquisition of commercial
vehicles and related equipment. The customer retail segment consists of loans and leases directly to customers for
the acquisition of commercial vehicles and related equipment. Customer retail receivables are further segregated
between fleet and owner/operator classes. The fleet class consists of customer retail accounts operating more than
five trucks. All other customer retail accounts are considered owner/operator. These two classes have similar
measurement attributes, risk characteristics and common methods to monitor and assess credit risk.
Allowance for Credit Losses: The allowance for credit losses is summarized as follows:
dealer
customer
2015
Balance at January 1
Provision for losses
Charge-offs
Recoveries
wholesale
$
9.0 $
(.8)
(.3)
11.9 $
(1.4)
Currency translation and other
Balance at December 31
(.6)
7.3 $
(.2)
10.3 $
$
93.6 $
11.6
(13.6)
3.5
(6.2)
88.9 $
7.5 $
3.0
(3.2)
.5
.5
8.3 $
retail
retail
other*
dealer
customer
2014
retail
retail
other*
Balance at January 1
Provision for losses
Charge-offs
Recoveries
wholesale
$
10.4 $
.3
(.9)
13.4 $
(1.4)
Currency translation and other
Balance at December 31
* Operating lease and other trade receivables.
(.8)
9.0 $
(.1)
11.9 $
$
97.5 $
14.8
(18.2)
4.6
(5.1)
93.6 $
8.0 $
1.7
(2.2)
.7
(.7)
7.5 $
total
122.0
12.4
(17.1)
4.0
(6.5)
114.8
total
129.3
15.4
(21.3)
5.3
(6.7)
122.0
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions)
64
Balance at January 1
Provision for losses
Charge-offs
Recoveries
Currency translation and other
Balance at December 31
* Operating lease and other trade receivables.
dealer
customer
2013
wholesale
$
11.8 $
(.9)
(.5)
$
10.4 $
retail
retail
other*
13.4 $
.2
(.2)
13.4 $
99.2 $
9.8
(21.2)
9.9
(.2)
97.5 $
5.6 $
3.8
(2.8)
1.0
.4
8.0 $
total
130.0
12.9
(24.5)
10.9
129.3
Information regarding finance receivables evaluated and determined individually and collectively is as follows:
At December 31, 2015
Recorded investment for impaired finance
receivables evaluated individually
Allowance for impaired finance receivables
determined individually
Recorded investment for finance receivables
evaluated collectively
Allowance for finance receivables determined
collectively
At December 31, 2014
Recorded investment for impaired finance
receivables evaluated individually
Allowance for impaired finance receivables
determined individually
Recorded investment for finance receivables
evaluated collectively
Allowance for finance receivables determined
collectively
dealer
customer
wholesale
retail
retail
total
$
5.0
$
64.0 $
69.0
.3
6.5
6.8
1,945.1 $ 1,561.3
5,711.1
9,217.5
7.0
10.3
82.4
99.7
dealer
customer
wholesale
retail
retail
total
$
4.9
$
43.7
$
48.6
.5
4.6
5.1
1,750.9 $ 1,606.5
5,659.1
9,016.5
8.5
11.9
89.0
109.4
The recorded investment for finance receivables that are on non-accrual status is as follows:
At December 31,
Dealer:
Wholesale
Customer retail:
Fleet
Owner/operator
2015
2014
$
$
5.0 $
4.9
50.7
10.0
65.7 $
34.4
8.9
48.2
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions)
Impaired Loans: Impaired loans are summarized below. The impaired loans with specific reserve represent the
unpaid principal balance. The recorded investment of impaired loans as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 was not
significantly different than the unpaid principal balance.
65
dealer
customer retail
wholesale
retail
owner/
fleet operator
At December 31, 2015
Impaired loans with a specific reserve
Associated allowance
Impaired loans with no specific reserve
Net carrying amount of impaired loans
Average recorded investment
$
$
$
$
5.0
(.3)
4.7
4.7
4.4
dealer
At December 31, 2014
wholesale
retail
Impaired loans with a specific reserve
Associated allowance
Impaired loans with no specific reserve
Net carrying amount of impaired loans
Average recorded investment
$
$
$
.5
(.5)
4.4
4.4
8.8
21.7 $
(3.5)
18.2 $
6.5
24.7 $
2.4 $
(.5)
1.9 $
.3
2.2 $
total
29.1
(4.3)
24.8
6.8
31.6
26.6 $
2.5 $
33.5
customer retail
owner/
fleet operator
12.7 $
(1.5)
11.2 $
12.3
23.5 $
2.6 $
(.5)
2.1 $
2.1 $
total
15.8
(2.5)
13.3
16.7
30.0
22.5 $
2.8 $
34.1
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
During the period the loans above were considered impaired, interest income recognized on a cash basis is as
follows:
Interest income recognized:
Dealer wholesale
Customer retail - fleet
Customer retail - owner/operator
2015
2014
2013
$
1.4
.4
1.8 $
.1 $
1.2
.4
1.7 $
.1
2.9
.9
3.9
$
$
Credit Quality: The Company’s customers are principally concentrated in the transportation industry in North
America, Europe and Australia. The Company’s portfolio assets are diversified over a large number of customers
and dealers with no single customer or dealer balances representing over 5% of the total portfolio assets. The
Company retains as collateral a security interest in the related equipment.
At the inception of each contract, the Company considers the credit risk based on a variety of credit quality factors
including prior payment experience, customer financial information, credit-rating agency ratings, loan-to-value
ratios and other internal metrics. On an ongoing basis, the Company monitors credit quality based on past due
status and collection experience as there is a meaningful correlation between the past due status of customers and
the risk of loss.
The Company has three credit quality indicators: performing, watch and at-risk. Performing accounts pay in
accordance with the contractual terms and are not considered high-risk. Watch accounts include accounts 31 to 90
days past due and large accounts that are performing but are considered to be high-risk. Watch accounts are not
impaired. At-risk accounts are accounts that are impaired, including TDRs, accounts over 90 days past due and
other accounts on non-accrual status. The tables below summarize the Company’s finance receivables by credit
quality indicator and portfolio class.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions)
66
At December 31, 2015
Performing
Watch
At-risk
At December 31, 2014
Performing
Watch
At-risk
dealer
customer retail
wholesale
retail
owner/
fleet operator
total
$ 1,922.4 $ 1,561.3 $ 4,680.6 $
996.6 $ 9,160.9
56.6
69.0
$ 1,950.1 $ 1,561.3 $ 4,761.4 $ 1,013.7 $ 9,286.5
6.9
10.2
22.7
5.0
27.0
53.8
dealer
customer retail
wholesale
retail
owner/
fleet operator
total
$ 1,739.5 $ 1,606.4 $ 4,430.9 $ 1,193.9 $ 8,970.7
45.8
48.6
$ 1,755.8 $ 1,606.5 $ 4,487.5 $ 1,215.3 $ 9,065.1
21.8
34.8
11.4
4.9
12.5
8.9
.1
The tables below summarize the Company’s finance receivables by aging category. In determining past due status,
the Company considers the entire contractual account balance past due when any installment is over 30 days past
due. Substantially all customer accounts that were greater than 30 days past due prior to credit modification
became current upon modification for aging purposes.
At December 31, 2015
Current and up to 30 days past due
31 - 60 days past due
Greater than 60 days past due
At December 31, 2014
Current and up to 30 days past due
31 - 60 days past due
Greater than 60 days past due
dealer
customer retail
wholesale
retail
owner/
fleet operator
total
$ 1,949.8 $ 1,561.3 $ 4,733.6 $ 1,002.7 $ 9,247.4
13.7
25.4
$ 1,950.1 $ 1,561.3 $ 4,761.4 $ 1,013.7 $ 9,286.5
8.3
19.5
5.4
5.6
.3
dealer
customer retail
wholesale
retail
owner/
fleet operator
total
$ 1,752.9 $ 1,606.5 $ 4,464.4 $ 1,200.0 $ 9,023.8
18.1
23.2
$ 1,755.8 $ 1,606.5 $ 4,487.5 $ 1,215.3 $ 9,065.1
10.6
12.5
6.9
8.4
.6
2.3
Troubled Debt Restructurings: The balance of TDRs was $52.3 and $36.0 at December 31, 2015 and 2014,
respectively. At modification date, the pre-modification and post-modification recorded investment balances for
finance receivables modified during the period by portfolio class are as follows:
2015
2014
Fleet
Owner/operator
recorded investment
pre-modification post-modification
37.9
6.5
44.4
38.3
6.5
44.8
$
$
$
$
recorded investment
pre-modification post-modification
24.1
2.3
26.4
24.4
2.3
26.7
$
$
$
$
The effect on the allowance for credit losses from such modifications was not significant at December 31, 2015
and 2014.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions)
TDRs modified during the previous twelve months that subsequently defaulted (i.e., became more than 30 days
past due) in the year ended by portfolio class are as follows:
67
Fleet
Owner/operator
2015
6.7
.4
7.1
$
$
2014
.7
.2
.9
$
$
The TDRs that subsequently defaulted did not significantly impact the Company’s allowance for credit losses at
December 31, 2015 and 2014.
Repossessions: When the Company determines a customer is not likely to meet its contractual commitments, the
Company repossesses the vehicles which serve as collateral for the loans, finance leases and equipment under
operating leases. The Company records the vehicles as used truck inventory included in Financial Services other
assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The balance of repossessed inventory at December 31, 2015 and 2014
was $14.6 and $19.0, respectively. Proceeds from the sales of repossessed assets were $48.0, $58.5 and $63.2 for the
years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. These amounts are included in proceeds from asset
disposals in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Write-downs of repossessed equipment on operating
leases are recorded as impairments and included in Financial Services depreciation and other expenses on the
Consolidated Statements of Income.
E .
E Q U I P M E N T O N O P E R A T I N G L E A S E S
A summary of equipment on operating leases for Truck, Parts and Other and for the Financial Services segment is
as follows:
At December 31,
Equipment on operating leases
Less allowance for depreciation
truck, parts and other
financial services
2015
$ 1,282.6
(290.4)
992.2
$
2014
$ 1,222.9
(288.4)
934.5
$
2015
$ 3,335.5
(954.7)
$ 2,380.8
2014
$ 3,269.0
(963.0)
$ 2,306.0
Annual minimum lease payments due on Financial Services operating leases beginning January 1, 2016 are $542.1,
$415.4, $250.4, $108.0, $32.4 and $6.0 thereafter.
When the equipment is sold subject to an RVG, the full sales price is received from the customer. A liability is
established for the residual value obligation with the remainder of the proceeds recorded as deferred lease revenue.
These amounts are summarized below:
At December 31,
Residual value guarantees
Deferred lease revenues
truck, parts and other
$
2015
691.4
356.0
$ 1,047.4
2014
629.1
341.8
970.9
$
$
The deferred lease revenue is amortized on a straight-line basis over the RVG contract period. At December 31,
2015, the annual amortization of deferred revenues beginning January 1, 2016 is $134.9, $100.5, $64.3, $41.3, $14.7
and $.3 thereafter. Annual maturities of the RVGs beginning January 1, 2016 are $284.0, $228.0, $97.6, $49.7, $26.1
and $6.0 thereafter.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions)
68
F .
P R O P E R T Y , P L A N T A N D E Q U I P M E N T
Property, plant and equipment include the following:
At December 31,
Land
Buildings and improvements
Machinery, equipment and production tooling
Construction in progress
Less allowance for depreciation
useful lives
2015
10 - 40 years
3 - 12 years
$
222.1
1,061.7
3,237.1
248.4
4,769.3
(2,592.9)
$ 2,176.4
$
2014
239.0
1,082.8
3,316.7
175.8
4,814.3
(2,501.0)
$ 2,313.3
G . A C C O U N T S P A Y A B L E , A C C R U E D E X P E N S E S A N D O T H E R
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other include the following:
At December 31,
Truck, Parts and Other:
Accounts payable
Product support liabilities
Accrued expenses
Accrued capital expenditures
Salaries and wages
Other
2015
2014
$
929.7
384.1
231.4
85.7
197.2
243.6
$ 2,071.7
$ 1,167.6
355.3
213.5
63.9
224.9
272.0
$ 2,297.2
H .
P R O D U C T S U P P O R T L I A B I L I T I E S
Changes in product support liabilities are summarized as follows:
warranty reserves
Balance at January 1
Cost accruals
Payments
Change in estimates for pre-existing warranties
Currency translation
Balance at December 31
deferred revenues on extended warranties and r&m contracts
Balance at January 1
Deferred revenues
Revenues recognized
Currency translation
Balance at December 31
2015
310.8
294.8
(228.8)
(21.3)
(9.3)
346.2
2015
462.0
333.0
(248.4)
(21.8)
524.8
$
$
$
$
2014
218.7
302.6
(210.5)
16.1
(16.1)
310.8
2014
411.8
323.7
(246.1)
(27.4)
462.0
$
$
$
$
2013
208.8
220.4
(211.5)
(1.2)
2.2
218.7
2013
331.9
260.4
(188.3)
7.8
411.8
$
$
$
$
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions)
Product support liabilities are included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as follows:
69
At December 31,
Truck, Parts and Other:
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other
Other liabilities
Financial Services:
Deferred taxes and other liabilities
warranty reserves
deferred revenues
2015
2014
2015
2014
$
241.6
104.6
$
229.1
81.7
$
346.2
$
310.8
$
$
142.5
368.2
14.1
524.8
$
$
126.2
324.5
11.3
462.0
I .
B O R R O W I N G S A N D C R E D I T A R R A N G E M E N T S
Financial Services borrowings include the following:
At December 31,
Commercial paper
Bank loans
Term notes
2015
effective
rate
.6%
4.8%
1.4%
1.2%
borrowings
$ 2,620.4
176.1
2,796.5
5,795.0
$ 8,591.5
2014
effective
rate
.8%
5.0%
1.5%
1.3%
borrowings
$ 2,506.0
135.9
2,641.9
5,588.7
$ 8,230.6
The commercial paper and term notes of $8,415.4 and $8,094.7 at December 31, 2015 and 2014 include a net effect
of fair value hedges and unamortized discounts of $(1.1) and $(1.0), respectively. The effective rate is the weighted
average rate as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 and includes the effects of interest-rate contracts.
The annual maturities of the Financial Services borrowings are as follows:
Beginning January 1, 2016
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
commerical
paper
$ 2,621.2
$ 2,621.2
bank
loans
39.5
20.3
46.5
32.0
37.8
176.1
$
$
term
notes
$ 1,575.9
2,229.9
1,356.2
579.0
54.3
$ 5,795.3
total
$ 4,236.6
2,250.2
1,402.7
611.0
92.1
$ 8,592.6
Interest paid on borrowings was $101.3, $136.3 and $149.3 in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. For the years
ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the Company capitalized interest on borrowings of nil, $1.3 and $10.3,
respectively, in Truck, Parts and Other.
The primary sources of borrowings in the capital markets are commercial paper and medium-term notes issued in
the public markets, and to a lesser extent, bank loans. The medium-term notes are issued by PACCAR Financial
Corp. (PFC), PACCAR Financial Europe and PACCAR Financial Mexico.
In November 2015, the Company’s U.S. finance subsidiary, PFC, filed a shelf registration under the Securities Act
of 1933. The total amount of medium-term notes outstanding for PFC as of December 31, 2015 was $4,400.0.
The registration expires in November 2018 and does not limit the principal amount of debt securities that may be
issued during that period.
As of December 31, 2015, the Company’s European finance subsidiary, PACCAR Financial Europe, had €269.0
available for issuance under a €1,500.0 medium-term note program listed on the Professional Securities Market of
the London Stock Exchange. This program replaced an expiring program in the second quarter of 2015 and is
renewable annually through the filing of new listing particulars.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions)
70
In April 2011, PACCAR Financial Mexico (PFM) registered a 10,000.0 peso medium-term note and commercial
paper program with the Comision Nacional Bancaria y de Valores. The registration expires in April 2016 and
limits the amount of commercial paper (up to one year) to 5,000.0 pesos. At December 31, 2015, 8,035.0 pesos
remained available for issuance. PFM intends to file a new program in April 2016.
The Company has line of credit arrangements of $3,435.0, of which $3,256.4 were unused at December 31, 2015.
Included in these arrangements are $3,000.0 of syndicated bank facilities, of which $1,000.0 expires in June 2016,
$1,000.0 expires in June 2019 and $1,000.0 expires in June 2020. The Company intends to replace these credit
facilities on or before expiration with facilities of similar amounts and duration. These credit facilities are
maintained primarily to provide backup liquidity for commercial paper borrowings and maturing medium-term
notes. There were no borrowings under the syndicated bank facilities for the year ended December 31, 2015.
J .
L E A S E S
The Company leases certain facilities and computer equipment under operating leases. Leases expire at various
dates through the year 2023. At January 1, 2016, annual minimum rent payments under non-cancelable operating
leases having initial or remaining terms in excess of one year are $23.2, $11.3, $7.6, $2.6, $1.3 and $1.4 thereafter.
For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, total rental expenses under all leases amounted to $30.5,
$34.5 and $34.1, respectively.
K . C O M M I T M E N T S A N D C O N T I N G E N C I E S
The Company is involved in various stages of investigations and cleanup actions in different countries related to
environmental matters. In certain of these matters, the Company has been designated as a “potentially responsible
party” by domestic and foreign environmental agencies. The Company has an undiscounted accrual to provide for
the estimated costs to investigate and complete cleanup actions where it is probable that the Company will incur
such costs in the future. Expenditures related to environmental activities for the years ended December 31, 2015,
2014 and 2013 were $2.0, $1.2 and $2.3, respectively.
While the timing and amount of the ultimate costs associated with future environmental cleanup cannot be
determined, management expects that these matters will not have a significant effect on the Company’s
consolidated financial position.
At December 31, 2015, PACCAR had standby letters of credit of $16.7, which guarantee various insurance and
financing activities. At December 31, 2015, PACCAR’s financial services companies, in the normal course of
business, had outstanding commitments to fund new loan and lease transactions amounting to $634.7. The
commitments generally expire in 90 days. The Company had other commitments, primarily to purchase
production inventory, equipment and energy amounting to $219.9, $61.1 and $4.0 for 2016, 2017 and 2018,
respectively, and nil for 2019 and 2020.
In January 2011, the European Commission (EC) commenced an investigation of all major European commercial
vehicle manufacturers, including subsidiaries of the Company, concerning whether such companies participated in
agreements or concerted practices to coordinate their commercial policy in the European Union. On November
20, 2014, the EC issued a Statement of Objections to the manufacturers, including DAF Trucks N.V., its subsidiary
DAF Trucks Deutschland GmbH and PACCAR Inc as their parent. The Statement of Objections is a procedural
step in which the EC expressed its preliminary view that the manufacturers had participated in anticompetitive
practices in the European Union. The EC indicated that it will seek to impose significant fines on the
manufacturers. DAF is cooperating with the EC and is preparing its response to the Statement of Objections.
The EC will review the manufacturers’ responses before issuing a decision. Any decision would be subject to
appeal. The Company is unable to estimate the potential fine at this time and accordingly, no accrual for any
potential fine has been made as of December 31, 2015.
PACCAR is a defendant in various legal proceedings and, in addition, there are various other contingent liabilities
arising in the normal course of business. After consultation with legal counsel, management does not anticipate
that disposition of these proceedings (except for the EC matter noted above) and contingent liabilities will have a
material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions) L .
E M P L O Y E E B E N E F I T S
71
Severance Costs: The Company incurred severance expense in 2015, 2014 and 2013 of $3.3, $1.8 and $3.5,
respectively.
Defined Benefit Pension Plans: The Company has several defined benefit pension plans, which cover a majority of its
employees. The Company evaluates its actuarial assumptions on an annual basis and considers changes based upon
market conditions and other factors.
The expected return on plan assets is determined by using a market-related value of assets, which is calculated based
on an average of the previous five years of asset gains and losses.
Generally, accumulated unrecognized actuarial gains and losses are amortized using the 10% corridor approach. The
corridor is defined as the greater of either 10% of the projected benefit obligation or the market-related value of plan
assets. The amortization amount is the excess beyond the corridor divided by the average remaining estimated
service life of participants on a straight-line basis.
The Company funds its pensions in accordance with applicable employee benefit and tax laws. The Company
contributed $62.9 to its pension plans in 2015 and $81.1 in 2014. The Company expects to contribute in the range
of $50.0 to $100.0 to its pension plans in 2016, of which $18.4 is estimated to satisfy minimum funding
requirements. Annual benefits expected to be paid beginning January 1, 2016 are $78.9, $81.3, $86.7, $90.6, $97.3
and for the five years thereafter, a total of $571.5.
Plan assets are invested in global equity and debt securities through professional investment managers with the
objective to achieve targeted risk adjusted returns and maintain liquidity sufficient to fund current benefit payments.
Typically, each defined benefit plan has an investment policy that includes a target for asset mix, including
maximum and minimum ranges for allocation percentages by investment category. The actual allocation of assets
may vary at times based upon rebalancing policies and other factors. The Company periodically assesses the target
asset mix by evaluating external sources of information regarding the long-term historical return, volatilities and
expected future returns for each investment category. In addition, the long-term rates of return assumptions for
pension accounting are reviewed annually to ensure they are appropriate. Target asset mix and forecast long-term
returns by asset category are considered in determining the assumed long-term rates of return, although historical
returns realized are given some consideration.
The fair value of mutual funds, common stocks and U.S. treasuries is determined using the market approach and is
based on the quoted prices in active markets. These securities are categorized as Level 1. The fair value of
commingled trust funds is determined using the market approach and is based on the unadjusted net asset value per
unit as determined by the sponsor of the fund based on the fair values of underlying investments. These securities
are categorized as Level 2. The fair value of debt securities is determined using the market approach and is based on
the quoted market prices of the securities or other observable inputs. These securities are categorized as Level 2.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions) 72
The following information details the allocation of plan assets by investment type. See Note P for definitions of
fair value levels.
At December 31, 2015
Equities:
U.S. equities
Global equities
Total equities
Fixed income:
U.S. fixed income
Non-U.S. fixed income
Total fixed income
Cash and other
Total plan assets
At December 31, 2014
Equities:
U.S. equities
Global equities
Total equities
Fixed income:
U.S. fixed income
Non-U.S. fixed income
Total fixed income
Cash and other
Total plan assets
target
level 1
level 2
total
50 - 70%
30 - 50%
$
593.8
674.2
1,268.0
$
593.8
674.2
1,268.0
$
283.4
283.4
8.2
291.6
$
348.2
253.7
601.9
57.5
$ 1,927.4
631.6
253.7
885.3
65.7
$ 2,219.0
target
level 1
level 2
total
50 - 70%
30 - 50%
$
666.4
691.3
1,357.7
$
666.4
691.3
1,357.7
$
269.4
269.4
7.7
277.1
$
339.2
286.5
625.7
48.9
$ 2,032.3
608.6
286.5
895.1
56.6
$ 2,309.4
The following additional data relates to all pension plans of the Company:
At December 31,
Weighted average assumptions:
Discount rate
Rate of increase in future compensation levels
Assumed long-term rate of return on plan assets
2015
4.2%
3.9%
6.5%
2014
3.8%
3.8%
6.5%
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions)
The components of the change in projected benefit obligation and change in plan assets are as follows:
73
Change in projected benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at January 1
Service cost
Interest cost
Benefits paid
Actuarial (gain) loss
Currency translation and other
Participant contributions
Projected benefit obligation at December 31
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at January 1
Employer contributions
Actual return on plan assets
Benefits paid
Currency translation and other
Participant contributions
Fair value of plan assets at December 31
Funded status at December 31
Amounts recorded on balance sheet:
Other noncurrent assets
Other liabilities
Accumulated other comprehensive loss:
Actuarial loss
Prior service cost
Net initial transition amount
2015
2014
$ 2,417.4
91.3
92.2
(121.3)
(141.6)
(35.6)
3.6
$ 2,306.0
$ 2,309.4
62.9
.3
(121.3)
(35.9)
3.6
$ 2,219.0
(87.0)
$
$ 1,961.6
67.3
91.8
(72.5)
412.8
(47.6)
4.0
$ 2,417.4
$ 2,108.4
81.1
235.8
(72.5)
(47.4)
4.0
$ 2,309.4
(108.0)
$
2015
2014
$
27.2
114.2
$
15.0
123.0
386.3
3.9
.2
428.9
3.9
.3
In 2015, the Company provided a one-time lump-sum offer to certain retired employees in the U.S. retirement
plan, which resulted in a lump-sum distribution totaling $48.5.
Of the December 31, 2015 amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss, $26.3 of unrecognized actuarial loss
and $1.2 of unrecognized prior service cost are expected to be amortized into net pension expense in 2016.
The accumulated benefit obligation for all pension plans of the Company was $2,028.2 and $2,113.7 at December
31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Information for all plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets is as follows:
At December 31,
Projected benefit obligation
Accumulated benefit obligation
Fair value of plan assets
$
2015
217.9
207.7
128.8
$
2014
224.2
212.1
139.1
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions)
74
The components of pension expense are as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
Service cost
Interest on projected benefit obligation
Expected return on assets
Amortization of prior service costs
Recognized actuarial loss
Curtailment gain
Net pension expense
2015
91.3 $
92.2
(140.8)
1.3
41.1
(.1)
85.0 $
$
$
2014
67.3 $
91.8
(128.0)
1.2
20.8
53.1 $
2013
73.5
81.0
(119.4)
1.3
44.0
(.3)
80.1
Multi-employer Plans: The Company participates in multi-employer plans in the U.S. and Europe. These are
typically under collective bargaining agreements and cover its union-represented employees. The Company’s
participation in the following multi-employer plans for the years ended December 31 are as follows:
pension plan
Metal and Electrical Engineering Industry Pension Fund
Western Metal Industry Pension Plan
Other plans
pension
plan
number
135668
001
ein
91-6033499
company contributions
2015
23.0 $
2.1
.9
26.0 $
$
$
2014
27.1 $
2.0
1.0
30.1 $
2013
24.5
1.5
.9
26.9
The Company contributions shown in the table above approximates the multi-employer pension expense for each
of the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Metal and Electrical Engineering Industry Pension Fund is a multi-employer union plan incorporating all DAF
employees in the Netherlands and is covered by a collective bargaining agreement which expired on April 30, 2015;
a new agreement is currently under negotiation. The Company’s contributions were less than 5% of the total
contributions to the plan for the last two reporting periods ending December 2015. The plan is required by law
(the Netherlands Pension Act) to have a coverage ratio in excess of 104.3%. Because the coverage ratio of the plan
was 97.7% at December 31, 2015, a funding improvement plan effective through 2026 is in place. The funding
improvement plan includes a reduction in pension benefits and delays in future benefit increases.
The Western Metal Industry Pension Plan is located in the U.S. and is covered by a collective bargaining agreement
that will expire on November 1, 2020. In accordance with the U.S. Pension Protection Act of 2006, the plan was
certified as critical (red) status and a funding improvement plan was implemented requiring additional
contributions through 2022 as long as the plan remains in critical status. For the last two reporting periods ending
December 2015, contributions by the Company were 12% of the total contributions to the plan.
Other plans are principally located in the U.S. For the last two reporting periods, none were under funding
improvement plans and Company contributions to these plans are less than 5% of each plan’s total contributions.
There were no significant changes for the multi-employer plans in the periods presented that affected comparability
between periods.
Defined Contribution Plans: The Company maintains several defined contribution benefit plans whereby it
contributes designated amounts on behalf of participant employees. The largest plan is for U.S. salaried employees
where the Company matches a percentage of employee contributions up to an annual limit. The match was 5% of
eligible pay in 2015, 2014 and 2013. Other plans are located in Australia, Brasil, Canada, the Netherlands, Belgium
and Germany. Expenses for these plans were $36.1, $36.3 and $34.0 in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions)
M .
I N C O M E T A X E S
75
The Company’s tax rate is based on income and statutory tax rates in the various jurisdictions in which the
Company operates. Tax law requires certain items to be included in the Company’s tax returns at different times
than the items reflected in the Company’s financial statements. As a result, the Company’s annual tax rate reflected
in its financial statements is different than that reported in its tax returns. Some of these differences are
permanent, such as expenses that are not deductible in the Company’s tax return, and some differences reverse
over time, such as depreciation expense. These temporary differences create deferred tax assets and liabilities. The
Company establishes valuation allowances for its deferred tax assets if, based on the available evidence, it is more
likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
The components of the Company’s income before income taxes include the following:
Year Ended December 31,
Domestic
Foreign
2015
$ 1,581.6
755.5
$ 2,337.1
2014
$ 1,267.3
750.3
$ 2,017.6
$
2013
827.0
868.0
$ 1,695.0
The components of the Company’s provision for income taxes include the following:
Year Ended December 31,
Current provision:
Federal
State
Foreign
Deferred (benefit) provision:
Federal
State
Foreign
2015
2014
2013
$
$
521.8
61.1
205.4
788.3
(57.8)
5.3
(2.7)
(55.2)
733.1
$
$
482.4
59.0
215.4
756.8
(88.3)
.3
(10.0)
(98.0)
658.8
$
$
191.4
20.9
214.1
426.4
68.8
18.4
10.1
97.3
523.7
Tax benefits recognized for net operating loss carryforwards were $.6, $16.0 and $4.5 for the years ended 2015, 2014
and 2013, respectively.
A reconciliation of the statutory U.S. federal tax rate to the effective income tax rate is as follows:
Statutory rate
Effect of:
State
Federal domestic production deduction
Tax on foreign earnings
Other, net
2015
35.0%
2.1
(1.8)
(2.7)
(1.2)
31.4%
2014
35.0%
2.0
(1.8)
(1.6)
(.9)
32.7%
2013
35.0%
1.3
(.9)
(3.8)
(.7)
30.9%
The Company has not provided a deferred tax liability for the temporary differences of approximately $4,100.0
related to the investments in foreign subsidiaries that are considered to be indefinitely reinvested. The amount of
the deferred tax liability would be approximately $300.0 as of December 31, 2015.
Included in domestic taxable income for 2015, 2014 and 2013 are $249.7, $249.0 and $241.7 of foreign earnings,
respectively, which are not indefinitely reinvested, for which domestic taxes of $12.2, $18.6 and $19.5, respectively,
were provided to account for the difference between the domestic and foreign tax rate on those earnings.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions)
76
At December 31, 2015, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of $397.0, of which $186.3 related to
foreign subsidiaries and $210.7 related to states in the U.S. The related deferred tax asset was $62.7, for which a
$30.7 valuation allowance has been provided. The carryforward periods range from five years to indefinite, subject
to certain limitations under applicable laws. The future tax benefits of net operating loss carryforwards are
evaluated on a regular basis, including a review of historical and projected operating results.
The tax effects of temporary differences representing deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
At December 31,
Assets:
Accrued expenses
Net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards
Postretirement benefit plans
Allowance for losses on receivables
Other
Valuation allowance
Liabilities:
Financial Services leasing depreciation
Depreciation and amortization
Other
Net deferred tax liability
2015
2014
$
240.7
63.6
44.9
41.9
112.5
503.6
(32.9)
470.7
$
215.9
67.2
43.3
43.0
112.1
481.5
(30.3)
451.2
(810.4)
(277.9)
(29.2)
(1,117.5)
(646.8)
$
(817.2)
(289.2)
(33.5)
(1,139.9)
(688.7)
$
The balance sheet classification of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:
At December 31,
Truck, Parts and Other:
Other current assets
Other noncurrent assets, net
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other
Other liabilities
Financial Services:
Other assets
Deferred taxes and other liabilities
Net deferred tax liability
2015
2014
$
135.7
(25.0)
44.9
(802.4)
(646.8)
$
$
$
134.8
16.0
(.9)
(87.2)
75.0
(826.4)
(688.7)
The Company adopted ASU 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, on a
prospective basis, effective December 31, 2015. As a result, all deferred income tax assets and liabilities are
classified as noncurrent on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2015.
Cash paid for income taxes was $879.7, $689.9 and $434.0 in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
Balance at January 1
Additions for tax positions related to the current year
Additions for tax positions related to prior years
Reductions for tax positions related to prior years
Reductions related to settlements
Lapse of statute of limitations
Balance at December 31
2015
12.0
10.3
(2.0)
(1.2)
19.1
$
$
2014
13.1
.9
.1
(.9)
(1.2)
12.0
$
$
2013
23.4
1.0
.3
(.7)
(9.7)
(1.2)
13.1
$
$
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions)
The Company had $19.1, $12.0 and $13.1 of unrecognized tax benefits, of which $9.9, $1.1 and $1.5 would impact
the effective tax rate, if recognized, as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
77
The Company recognized $1.9, $.8 and $1.1 of income related to interest in 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Accrued interest expense and penalties were $2.8, $4.7 and $5.5 as of December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013,
respectively. Interest and penalties are classified as income taxes in the Consolidated Statements of Income.
The Company believes it is reasonably possible that approximately $7 of unrecognized tax benefits, resulting
primarily from intercompany transactions, will be resolved within the next twelve months from Competent
Authority negotiations between tax authorities of two jurisdictions; the Company does not expect the net impact of
these negotiations will be material to its effective tax rate. As of December 31, 2015, the United States Internal
Revenue Service has completed examinations of the Company’s tax returns for all years through 2010. The
Company’s tax returns for other major jurisdictions remain subject to examination for the years ranging from 2005
through 2015.
N .
S T O C K H O L D E R S ’ E Q U I T Y
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss): The components of AOCI and the changes in AOCI, net of tax,
included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, consisted of
the following:
Balance at January 1, 2015
Recorded into AOCI
Reclassified out of AOCI
Net other comprehensive
income (loss)
Balance at December 31, 2015
Balance at January 1, 2014
Recorded into AOCI
Reclassified out of AOCI
Net other comprehensive
income (loss)
Balance at December 31, 2014
Balance at January 1, 2013
Recorded into AOCI
Reclassified out of AOCI
Net other comprehensive
income (loss)
Balance at December 31, 2013
derivative
contracts
marketable
debt securities
$
$
(13.5)
27.9
(20.8)
7.1
(6.4)
$
$
5.3
(1.7)
(1.5)
(3.2)
2.1
derivative
contracts
marketable
debt securities
$
$
(15.1)
20.0
(18.4)
1.6
(13.5)
$
$
1.7
4.2
(.6)
3.6
5.3
derivative
contracts
marketable
debt securities
$
$
(27.2)
36.9
(24.8)
12.1
(15.1)
$
$
6.6
(6.1)
1.2
(4.9)
1.7
pension
plans
(433.1)
15.1
27.6
42.7
(390.4)
pension
plans
(262.2)
(185.8)
14.9
(170.9)
(433.1)
pension
plans
(496.5)
204.8
29.5
234.3
(262.2)
$
$
$
$
$
$
foreign
currency
translation
(138.5)
(483.8)
$
total
(579.8)
(442.5)
5.3
(483.8)
(622.3)
(437.2)
$ (1,017.0)
$
$
foreign
currency
translation
$
$
284.3
(422.8)
(422.8)
(138.5)
foreign
currency
translation
$
$
357.6
(71.3)
(2.0)
(73.3)
284.3
total
8.7
(584.4)
(4.1)
(588.5)
(579.8)
total
(159.5)
164.3
3.9
168.2
8.7
$
$
$
$
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions)
78
Reclassifications out of AOCI during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 are as follows:
aoci components
Unrealized (gains) and losses on derivative contracts:
Truck, Parts and Other
line item in the consolidated statements
of income
Foreign-exchange contracts
Net sales and revenues
Cost of sales and revenues
Interest and other expense, net
$
Financial Services
Interest-rate contracts
Interest and other borrowing expenses
Pre-tax expense reduction
Tax expense
After-tax expense reduction
Unrealized (gains) and losses on marketable debt securities:
Marketable debt securities
Investment income
Tax expense (benefit)
After-tax income (increase) decrease
Pension plans:
Truck, Parts and Other
Actuarial loss
Prior service costs
Financial Services
Actuarial loss
Foreign currency translation:
Truck, Parts and Other
Financial Services
Cost of sales and revenues
Selling, general and administrative
Cost of sales and revenues
Selling, general and administrative
Research and development
Selling, general and administrative
Pre-tax expense increase
Tax benefit
After-tax expense increase
Interest and other expense, net
Interest and other borrowing expenses
Expense reduction
(.1)
3.4
(4.1)
(28.5)
(29.3)
8.5
(20.8)
(2.1)
.6
(1.5)
22.4
17.1
39.5
1.0
.2
1.2
1.7
42.4
(14.8)
27.6
amount reclassified out of aoci
2015
2014
2013
$
.3
(2.1)
$
1.0
(.6)
(21.7)
(23.5)
5.1
(18.4)
(.9)
.3
(.6)
11.1
9.0
20.1
1.0
.2
1.2
.7
22.0
(7.1)
14.9
(36.0)
(35.6)
10.8
(24.8)
1.7
(.5)
1.2
21.4
20.3
41.7
.4
.6
.3
1.3
2.3
45.3
(15.8)
29.5
(1.1)
(.9)
(2.0)
3.9
Total reclassifications out of AOCI
$
5.3
$
(4.1)
$
Other Capital Stock Changes: The Company purchased treasury shares of 3.8 million, .7 million and nil in 2015,
2014 and 2013, respectively. The Company retired treasury shares of 4.5 million in 2015; there were no treasury
stock retirements in 2014 or 2013.
O . D E R I V A T I V E F I N A N C I A L I N S T R U M E N T S
As part of its risk management strategy, the Company enters into derivative contracts to hedge against interest rate
and foreign currency risk.
Interest-Rate Contracts: The Company enters into various interest-rate contracts, including interest-rate swaps and
cross currency interest-rate swaps. Interest-rate swaps involve the exchange of fixed for floating rate or floating for
fixed rate interest payments based on the contractual notional amounts in a single currency. Cross currency
interest-rate swaps involve the exchange of notional amounts and interest payments in different currencies. The
Company is exposed to interest-rate and exchange-rate risk caused by market volatility as a result of its borrowing
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions)
activities. The objective of these contracts is to mitigate the fluctuations on earnings, cash flows and fair value of
borrowings. Net amounts paid or received are reflected as adjustments to interest expense.
79
At December 31, 2015, the notional amount of the Company’s interest-rate contracts was $3,303.5. Notional
maturities for all interest-rate contracts are $1,276.4 for 2016, $728.0 for 2017, $1,040.5 for 2018, $95.0 for 2019,
$141.3 for 2020 and $22.3 thereafter. Substantially all of these contracts are floating to fixed swaps that effectively
convert an equivalent amount of commercial paper and other variable rate debt to fixed rates.
Foreign-Exchange Contracts: The Company enters into foreign-exchange contracts to hedge certain anticipated
transactions and assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies, particularly the Canadian dollar, the euro,
the British pound, the Australian dollar, the Brazilian real and the Mexican peso. The objective is to reduce
fluctuations in earnings and cash flows associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates. At December
31, 2015, the notional amount of the outstanding foreign-exchange contracts was $286.1. Foreign-exchange
contracts mature within one year.
The following table presents the balance sheet classification, fair value, gross and pro-forma net amounts of
derivative financial instruments:
At December 31,
Derivatives designated under hedge accounting:
Interest-rate contracts:
Financial Services:
Other assets
Deferred taxes and other liabilities
Foreign-exchange contracts:
Truck, Parts and Other:
Other current assets
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other
Total
Economic hedges:
Foreign-exchange contracts:
Truck, Parts and Other:
Other current assets
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other
Financial Services:
Other assets
Deferred taxes and other liabilities
Total
Gross amounts recognized in Balance Sheet
Less amounts not offset in financial instruments:
Truck, Parts and Other:
Foreign-exchange contracts
Financial Services:
Interest-rate contracts
Foreign-exchange contracts
Pro-forma net amount
2015
2014
assets
liabilities
assets
liabilities
$ 132.2
$ 82.7
$ 46.7
$ 45.7
3.9
$ 136.1
.2
$ 46.9
1.2
$ 83.9
1.9
$ 47.6
$
.9
.3
$
1.2
$
1.9
$
.3
$
.9
3.4
1.0
$ 1.3
$
5.3
$
.9
$ 137.3
$ 48.2
$ 89.2
$ 48.5
(.4)
(.4)
(.9)
(.9)
(3.3)
(.2)
$ 133.4
(3.3)
(.2)
$ 44.3
(3.9)
(3.9)
$ 84.4
$ 43.7
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions)
80
Fair Value Hedges: Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as fair value hedges are recorded in earnings
together with the changes in fair value of the hedged item attributable to the risk being hedged. The (income) or
expense recognized in earnings related to fair value hedges was included in interest and other borrowing expenses
in the Financial Services segment of the Consolidated Statements of Income as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
Interest-rate swaps
Term notes
$
2015
2014
(.9) $
.2
.1 $
(2.6)
2013
.7
(5.1)
Cash Flow Hedges: Substantially all of the Company’s interest-rate contracts and some foreign-exchange contracts
have been designated as cash flow hedges. Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges
are recorded in AOCI to the extent such hedges are considered effective. Amounts in AOCI are reclassified into net
income in the same period in which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The maximum length of time over
which the Company is hedging its exposure to the variability in future cash flows is 5.4 years. For the periods
ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the Company recognized gains on the ineffective portion of nil, nil and
$.1, respectively.
The following table presents the pre-tax effects of derivative instruments recognized in other comprehensive (loss)
income (OCI):
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2013
Gain (loss) recognized in OCI:
Truck, Parts and Other
Financial Services
Total
interest-
rate
contracts
foreign-
exchange
contracts
interest-
rate
contracts
foreign-
exchange
contracts
interest-
rate
contracts
foreign-
exchange
contracts
$
4.9
$
$
33.8
33.8 $
$
4.9 $
$
24.4
24.4 $
1.7
$
1.7 $
$
(1.2)
54.4
54.4 $
(1.2)
Expense (income) reclassified out of AOCI into income was as follows:
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2013
interest-
rate
contracts
foreign-
exchange
contracts
interest-
rate
contracts
foreign-
exchange
contracts
interest-
rate
contracts
foreign-
exchange
contracts
Truck, Parts and Other:
Net sales and revenues
Cost of sales and revenues
Interest and other expense, net
Financial Services:
$
(.1)
3.4
(4.1)
$
.3
(2.1)
$
Interest and other borrowing expenses
Total
$
$
(28.5)
(28.5) $
$
(.8) $
(21.7)
(21.7) $
$
(1.8) $
(36.0)
(36.0) $
1.0
(.6)
.4
The amount of loss recorded in AOCI at December 31, 2015 that is estimated to be reclassified into earnings in the
following 12 months if interest rates and exchange rates remain unchanged is approximately $6.0, net of taxes. The
fixed interest earned on finance receivables will offset the amount recognized in interest expense, resulting in a
stable interest margin consistent with the Company’s risk management strategy.
The amount of gains or losses reclassified out of AOCI into net income based on the probability that the original
forecasted transactions would not occur was nil for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.
Economic Hedges: For other risk management purposes, the Company enters into derivative instruments that do
not qualify for hedge accounting. These derivative instruments are used to mitigate the risk of market volatility
arising from borrowings and foreign currency denominated transactions. Changes in the fair value of economic
hedges are recorded in earnings in the period in which the change occurs.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions)
The (income) expense recognized in earnings related to economic hedges was as follows:
81
Year Ended December 31,
2015
2014
2013
Truck, Parts and Other:
Cost of sales and revenues
Interest and other expense, net
Financial Services:
Interest and other borrowing expenses
Selling, general and administrative
Total
P .
F A I R V A L U E M E A S U R E M E N T S
interest-
rate
contracts
foreign-
exchange
contracts
interest-
rate
contracts
foreign-
exchange
contracts
interest-
rate
contracts
foreign-
exchange
contracts
$
$
(.7)
3.0
(7.6)
(2.3)
(7.6)
$
$
(5.3)
3.8
4.2 $
5.2
7.9 $
$
(1.3)
.3
(1.5)
(9.6)
(1.5) $
(10.6)
Fair value represents the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Inputs to valuation techniques used to measure
fair value are either observable or unobservable. These inputs have been categorized into the fair value hierarchy
described below.
Level 1 – Valuations are based on quoted prices that the Company has the ability to obtain in actively traded
markets for identical assets or liabilities. Since valuations are based on quoted prices that are readily and
regularly available in an active market or exchange traded market, valuation of these instruments does not
require a significant degree of judgment.
Level 2 – Valuations are based on quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for
identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation techniques for which
all significant assumptions are observable in the market.
Level 3 – Valuations are based on model-based techniques for which some or all of the assumptions are
obtained from indirect market information that is significant to the overall fair value measurement and which
require a significant degree of management judgment.
There were no transfers of assets or liabilities between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy during the
year ended December 31, 2015. The Company’s policy is to recognize transfers between levels at the end of the
reporting period.
The Company uses the following methods and assumptions to measure fair value for assets and liabilities subject to
recurring fair value measurements.
Marketable Securities: The Company’s marketable debt securities consist of municipal bonds, government
obligations, investment-grade corporate obligations, commercial paper, asset-backed securities and term deposits.
The fair value of U.S. government obligations is determined using the market approach and is based on quoted
prices in active markets and are categorized as Level 1.
The fair value of U.S. government agency obligations, non-U.S. government bonds, municipal bonds, corporate
bonds, asset-backed securities, commercial paper and term deposits is determined using the market approach and is
primarily based on matrix pricing as a practical expedient which does not rely exclusively on quoted prices for a
specific security. Significant inputs used to determine fair value include interest rates, yield curves, credit rating of
the security and other observable market information and are categorized as Level 2.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions)
82
Derivative Financial Instruments: The Company’s derivative contracts consist of interest-rate swaps, cross currency
swaps and foreign currency exchange contracts. These derivative contracts are traded over the counter and their
fair value is determined using industry standard valuation models, which are based on the income approach (i.e.,
discounted cash flows). The significant observable inputs into the valuation models include interest rates, yield
curves, currency exchange rates, credit default swap spreads and forward rates and are categorized as Level 2.
Assets and Liabilities Subject to Recurring Fair Value Measurement
The Company’s assets and liabilities subject to recurring fair value measurements are either Level 1 or Level 2 as
follows:
At December 31, 2015
Assets:
Marketable debt securities
U.S. tax-exempt securities
U.S. corporate securities
U.S. government and agency securities
Non-U.S. corporate securities
Non-U.S. government securities
Other debt securities
Total marketable debt securities
Derivatives
Cross currency swaps
Interest-rate swaps
Foreign-exchange contracts
Total derivative assets
Liabilities:
Derivatives
Cross currency swaps
Interest-rate swaps
Foreign-exchange contracts
Total derivative liabilities
level 1
level 2
total
$
15.1
$
15.1
$
505.4
76.7
.6
587.0
193.7
69.6
$ 1,433.0
$
$
$
$
130.5
1.7
5.1
137.3
37.2
9.5
1.5
48.2
$
505.4
76.7
15.7
587.0
193.7
69.6
$ 1,448.1
$
$
$
$
130.5
1.7
5.1
137.3
37.2
9.5
1.5
48.2
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions)
At December 31, 2014
Assets:
Marketable debt securities
U.S. tax-exempt securities
U.S. corporate securities
U.S. government and agency securities
Non-U.S. corporate securities
Non-U.S. government securities
Other debt securities
Total marketable debt securities
Derivatives
Cross currency swaps
Interest-rate swaps
Foreign-exchange contracts
Total derivative assets
Liabilities:
Derivatives
Cross currency swaps
Interest-rate swaps
Foreign-exchange contracts
Total derivative liabilities
level 1
level 2
total
83
$
363.4
81.5
.3
532.0
194.1
93.0
$ 1,264.3
$
363.4
81.5
8.0
532.0
194.1
93.0
$ 1,272.0
$
$
7.7
7.7
$
$
$
$
81.7
1.0
6.5
89.2
31.1
14.6
2.8
48.5
$
$
$
$
81.7
1.0
6.5
89.2
31.1
14.6
2.8
48.5
Fair Value Disclosure of Other Financial Instruments
For financial instruments that are not recognized at fair value, the Company uses the following methods and
assumptions to determine the fair value. These instruments are categorized as Level 2, except cash which is
categorized as Level 1 and fixed rate loans which are categorized as Level 3.
Cash and Cash Equivalents: Carrying amounts approximate fair value.
Financial Services Net Receivables: For floating-rate loans, wholesale financing, and operating lease and other trade
receivables, carrying values approximate fair values. For fixed rate loans, fair values are estimated using the income
approach by discounting cash flows to their present value based on current rates for comparable loans. Finance
lease receivables and related allowance for credit losses have been excluded from the accompanying table.
Debt: The carrying amounts of financial services commercial paper, variable rate bank loans and variable rate term
notes approximate fair value. For fixed rate debt, fair values are estimated using the income approach by
discounting cash flows to their present value based on current rates for comparable debt.
The Company’s estimate of fair value for fixed rate loans and debt that are not carried at fair value was as follows:
At December 31,
Assets:
2015
carrying
amount
2014
fair
value
carrying
amount
fair
value
Financial Services fixed rate loans
$ 3,660.6
$ 3,729.0
$ 3,627.5
$ 3,683.3
Liabilities:
Financial Services fixed rate debt
4,167.9
4,192.2
3,713.4
3,737.7
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions)
84
Q . S T O C K C O M P E N S A T I O N P L A N S
PACCAR has certain plans under which officers and key employees may be granted options to purchase shares of the
Company’s authorized but unissued common stock under plans approved by stockholders. Non-employee directors
and certain officers may be granted restricted shares of the Company’s common stock under plans approved by
stockholders. Options outstanding under these plans were granted with exercise prices equal to the fair market value
of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant. Options expire no later than ten years from the grant date
and generally vest after three years. Restricted stock awards generally vest over three years or earlier upon meeting
certain age and service requirements.
The Company recognizes compensation cost on these options and restricted stock awards on a straight-line basis
over the requisite period the employee is required to render service. The maximum number of shares of the
Company’s common stock authorized for issuance under these plans is 46.7 million shares, and as of December 31,
2015, the maximum number of shares available for future grants was 15.5 million.
The estimated fair value of each option award is determined on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton
option pricing model that uses assumptions noted in the following table. The risk-free interest rate is based on the
U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. Expected volatility is based on historical volatility. The
dividend yield is based on an estimated future dividend yield using projected net income for the next five years,
implied dividends and Company stock price. The expected term is based on the period of time that options granted
are expected to be outstanding based on historical experience.
Risk-free interest rate
Expected volatility
Expected dividend yield
Expected term
Weighted average grant date fair value of options per share
2015
1.35%
28%
3.4%
5 years
$ 10.98
2014
1.51%
34%
3.4%
5 years
$ 13.17
2013
.88%
44%
3.3%
5 years
$ 13.78
The fair value of options granted was $6.3, $8.6 and $11.2 for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013,
respectively. The fair value of options vested during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 was $9.5,
$10.5 and $8.8, respectively.
A summary of activity under the Company’s stock plans is presented below:
Intrinsic value of options exercised
Cash received from stock option exercises
Tax benefit related to stock award exercises
Stock based compensation
Tax benefit related to stock based compensation
$
2015
14.1
21.8
3.5
14.6
5.1
$
2014
20.9
29.1
4.4
16.2
5.6
$
2013
19.6
31.0
3.9
14.0
4.9
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions, except per share data)
The summary of options as of December 31, 2015 and changes during the year then ended are presented below:
85
Options outstanding at January 1
Granted
Exercised
Cancelled
Options outstanding at December 31
Vested and expected to vest
Exercisable
* Weighted Average
number
of shares
4,536,700
569,500
(582,300)
(102,300)
4,421,600
4,325,600
2,590,700
per share
exercise
price*
$ 44.25
62.46
37.50
55.17
$ 47.23
$ 46.93
$ 41.14
remaining
contractual
life in years*
aggregate
intrinsic
value
5.69
5.63
4.04
$
$
$
17.5
17.5
17.5
The fair value of restricted shares is determined based upon the stock price on the date of grant. The summary of
nonvested restricted shares as of December 31, 2015 and changes during the year then ended is presented below:
nonvested shares
Nonvested awards outstanding at January 1
Granted
Vested
Nonvested awards outstanding at December 31
* Weighted Average
number
of shares
185,700
112,000
(115,800)
181,900
grant date
fair value*
$
$
51.60
63.39
51.70
58.79
As of December 31, 2015, there was $5.9 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options,
which is recognized over a remaining weighted average vesting period of 1.47 years. Unrecognized compensation
cost related to nonvested restricted stock awards of $1.4 is expected to be recognized over a remaining weighted
average vesting period of 1.51 years.
The dilutive and antidilutive options are shown separately in the table below:
Year Ended December 31,
Additional shares
Antidilutive options
2015
2014
906,100
1,180,400
1,120,500
673,700
2013
932,000
873,800
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions, except per share data)
86
R .
S E G M E N T A N D R E L A T E D I N F O R M A T I O N
PACCAR operates in three principal segments: Truck, Parts and Financial Services. The Company evaluates the
performance of its Truck and Parts segments based on operating profits, which excludes investment income, other
income and expense and income taxes. The Financial Services segment’s performance is evaluated based on income
before income taxes. Geographic revenues from external customers are presented based on the country of the
customer. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those applied in the consolidated
financial statements as described in Note A.
Truck and Parts: The Truck segment includes the design and manufacture of high-quality, light-, medium- and
heavy-duty commercial trucks and the Parts segment includes the distribution of aftermarket parts for trucks and
related commercial vehicles, both of which are sold through the same network of independent dealers. These
segments derive a large proportion of their revenues and operating profits from operations in North America and
Europe. The Truck segment incurs substantial costs to design, manufacture and sell trucks to its customers. The
sale of new trucks provides the Parts segment with the basis for parts sales that may continue over the life of the
truck, but are generally concentrated in the first five years after truck delivery. To reflect the benefit the Parts
segment receives from costs incurred by the Truck segment, certain expenses are allocated from the Truck segment
to the Parts segment. The expenses allocated are based on a percentage of the average annual expenses for factory
overhead, engineering, research and development and SG&A expenses for the preceding five years. The allocation
is based on the ratio of the average parts direct margin dollars (net sales less material and labor costs) to the total
truck and parts direct margin dollars for the previous five years. The Company believes such expenses have been
allocated on a reasonable basis. Truck segment assets related to the indirect expense allocation are not allocated to
the Parts segment.
Financial Services: The Financial Services segment derives its earnings primarily from financing or leasing of
PACCAR products and services provided to truck customers and dealers. Revenues are primarily generated from
operations in North America and Europe.
Other: Included in Other is the Company’s industrial winch manufacturing business. Also within this category are
other sales, income and expense not attributable to a reportable segment, including a portion of corporate
expenses. Intercompany interest income on cash advances to the financial services companies is included in Other
and was $.5, $.9 and $.7 for 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Geographic Area Data
Net sales and revenues:
United States
Europe
Other
Property, plant and equipment, net:
United States
The Netherlands
Other
Equipment on operating leases, net:
United States
Mexico
Germany
United Kingdom
Other
2015
2014
2013
$ 11,408.3
4,515.9
3,190.9
$ 19,115.1
$ 1,140.5
438.7
597.2
$ 2,176.4
$ 1,287.9
330.0
321.9
321.3
1,111.9
$ 3,373.0
$ 10,106.3
4,835.7
4,055.0
$ 18,997.0
$ 1,132.0
517.4
663.9
$ 2,313.3
$ 1,226.6
346.9
347.0
342.2
977.8
$ 3,240.5
$ 8,147.6
4,967.2
4,009.0
$ 17,123.8
$ 1,183.1
620.0
710.2
$ 2,513.3
$ 1,153.8
361.6
404.1
414.9
994.0
$ 3,328.4
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions)
Business Segment Data
Net sales and revenues:
Truck
Less intersegment
External customers
Parts
Less intersegment
External customers
Other
Financial Services
Income before income taxes:
Truck
Parts
Other
Financial Services
Investment income
Depreciation and amortization:
Truck
Parts
Other
Financial Services
Expenditures for long-lived assets:
Truck
Parts
Other
Financial Services
Segment assets:
Truck
Parts
Other
Cash and marketable securities
Financial Services
2015
2014
2013
87
$ 15,568.6
(786.1)
14,782.5
$ 15,330.4
(736.4)
14,594.0
$ 13,627.7
(624.8)
13,002.9
3,104.7
(44.6)
3,060.1
100.2
17,942.8
1,172.3
$ 19,115.1
$ 1,440.3
555.6
(43.2)
1,952.7
362.6
21.8
$ 2,337.1
$
$
399.8
6.2
14.9
420.9
486.2
907.1
$
660.0
24.9
17.7
702.6
1,044.4
$ 1,747.0
$ 4,472.3
793.3
211.6
3,378.0
8,855.2
12,254.6
$ 21,109.8
3,125.9
(48.4)
3,077.5
121.3
17,792.8
1,204.2
$ 18,997.0
$ 1,160.1
496.7
(31.9)
1,624.9
370.4
22.3
$ 2,017.6
$
$
415.0
5.9
11.8
432.7
485.0
917.7
$
504.9
9.9
12.1
526.9
935.3
$ 1,462.2
$ 4,871.1
787.2
106.1
2,937.1
8,701.5
11,917.3
$ 20,618.8
2,868.3
(46.1)
2,822.2
123.8
15,948.9
1,174.9
$ 17,123.8
$
936.7
416.0
(26.5)
1,326.2
340.2
28.6
$ 1,695.0
$
$
352.9
5.3
10.2
368.4
442.3
810.7
$
812.9
6.8
20.8
840.5
931.2
$ 1,771.7
$ 5,123.3
748.4
298.5
2,925.2
9,095.4
11,630.1
$ 20,725.5
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDecember 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (currencies in millions)
M A N A G E M E N T ’ S R E P O R T O N I N T E R N A L C O N T R O L O V E R
F I N A N C I A L R E P O R T I N G
88
The management of PACCAR Inc (the Company) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
Internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements because of its inherent
limitations. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may
become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and
procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based
on criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in Internal Control–Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework).
Based on this assessment, management concluded that the Company maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2015.
Ernst & Young LLP, the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm that audited the financial statements
included in this Annual Report, has issued an attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting. The attestation report is included on page 89.
Ronald E. Armstrong
Chief Executive Officer
R E P O R T O F I N D E P E N D E N T R E G I S T E R E D P U B L I C A C C O U N T I N G F I R M
O N T H E C O M P A N Y ’ S C O N S O L I D A T E D F I N A N C I A L S T A T E M E N T S
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of PACCAR Inc
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of PACCAR Inc as of December 31, 2015 and 2014,
and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for
each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015. These financial statements are the responsibility of
the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on
our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test
basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing
the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the
consolidated financial position of PACCAR Inc at December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the consolidated results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States), PACCAR Inc’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria
established in Internal Control–Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (2013 framework) and our report dated February 16, 2016 expressed an unqualified opinion
thereon.
Seattle, Washington
February 16, 2016
R E P O R T O F I N D E P E N D E N T R E G I S T E R E D P U B L I C A C C O U N T I N G
F I R M O N T H E C O M P A N Y ’ S I N T E R N A L C O N T R O L O V E R
F I N A N C I A L R E P O R T I N G
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of PACCAR Inc
89
We have audited PACCAR Inc’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria
established in Internal Control–Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). PACCAR Inc’s management is responsible for
maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit
included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material
weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the
assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe
that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,
accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable
assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, PACCAR Inc maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States), the consolidated balance sheets of PACCAR Inc as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the related
consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2015 and our report dated February 16, 2016 expressed an
unqualified opinion thereon.
Seattle, Washington
February 16, 2016
S E L E C T E D F I N A N C I A L D A T A
90
2015
2014
2013
2012
2011
(millions except per share data)
Truck, Parts and Other Net Sales
Financial Services Revenues
Total Revenues
$ 17,942.8
1,172.3
$ 19,115.1
$ 17,792.8
1,204.2
$ 18,997.0
$ 15,948.9
1,174.9
$ 17,123.8
$ 15,951.7
1,098.8
$ 17,050.5
$ 15,325.9
1,029.3
$ 16,355.2
Net Income
Net Income Per Share:
Basic
Diluted
Cash Dividends Declared Per Share
Total Assets:
Truck, Parts and Other
Financial Services
Truck, Parts and Other Long-Term Debt
Financial Services Debt
Stockholders' Equity
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
$ 1,604.0
$ 1,358.8
$ 1,171.3
$ 1,111.6
$ 1,042.3
4.52
4.51
2.32
3.83
3.82
1.86
8,855.2
12,254.6
8,701.5
11,917.3
8,591.5
6,940.4
21.65x
8,230.6
6,753.2
16.14x
3.31
3.30
1.70
9,095.4
11,630.1
150.0
8,274.2
6,634.3
11.17x
3.13
3.12
1.58
7,832.3
10,795.5
150.0
7,730.1
5,846.9
10.69x
2.87
2.86
1.30
7,771.3
9,401.4
150.0
6,505.4
5,364.4
8.93x
C O M M O N S T O C K M A R K E T P R I C E S A N D D I V I D E N D S
Common stock of the Company is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol PCAR. The
table below reflects the range of trading prices as reported by The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC and cash dividends
declared. There were 1,713 record holders of the common stock at December 31, 2015.
quarter
First
Second
Third
Fourth
Year-End Extra
2015
stock price
high
$68.87
68.44
66.43
56.05
low
$59.33
60.50
51.51
45.04
$
dividends
declared
.22
.22
.24
.24
1.40
2014
stock price
high
$68.81
68.38
67.64
71.15
low
$53.59
60.21
56.61
55.34
$
dividends
declared
.20
.22
.22
.22
1.00
The Company expects to continue paying regular cash dividends, although there is no assurance as to future
dividends because they are dependent upon future earnings, capital requirements and financial conditions.
Q U A R T E R L Y R E S U L T S ( U N A U D I T E D )
2015
Truck, Parts and Other:
Net sales and revenues
Cost of sales and revenues
Research and development
Financial Services:
Revenues
Interest and other borrowing expenses
Depreciation and other expenses
Net Income
Net Income Per Share:
Basic
Diluted
2014
Truck, Parts and Other:
Net sales and revenues
Cost of sales and revenues
Research and development
Financial Services:
Revenues
Interest and other borrowing expenses
Depreciation and other expenses
Net Income
Net Income Per Share:
Basic
Diluted
quarter
91
first
second
third
fourth
(millions except per share data)
$ 4,548.0
$ 4,786.1
$ 4,546.2
$ 4,062.5
3,910.2
4,061.2
3,851.3
3,469.4
56.2
59.3
57.6
66.7
284.7
29.1
140.4
378.4
293.8
29.6
145.9
447.2
301.0
29.2
152.5
431.2
292.8
30.1
144.9
347.2
$
1.07
1.06
$
1.26
1.26
$
1.21
1.21
$
.98
.98
$ 4,086.2
$ 4,267.0
$ 4,622.5
$ 4,817.1
3,595.5
3,719.4
4,006.3
4,160.4
52.7
49.9
50.5
62.5
293.7
36.6
144.3
273.9
302.6
33.7
148.4
319.2
305.9
32.6
147.3
371.4
302.0
30.8
148.5
394.3
$
$
.77
.77
.90
.90
$
1.05
1.04
$
1.11
1.11
M A R K E T R I S K S A N D D E R I V A T I V E I N S T R U M E N T S
(currencies in millions)
92
Interest-Rate Risks - See Note O for a description of the Company’s hedging programs and exposure to interest
rate fluctuations. The Company measures its interest-rate risk by estimating the amount by which the fair value of
interest-rate sensitive assets and liabilities, including derivative financial instruments, would change assuming an
immediate 100 basis point increase across the yield curve as shown in the following table:
Fair Value Gains (Losses)
C O N S O L I D A T E D :
Assets
Cash equivalents and marketable debt securities
F I N A N C I A L S E R V I C E S:
Assets
Fixed rate loans
Liabilities
Fixed rate term debt
Interest-rate swaps
Total
2015
2014
$
(21.7)
$
(18.0)
(71.3)
(69.7)
79.0
19.3
5.3
$
66.0
36.8
15.1
$
Currency Risks - The Company enters into foreign currency exchange contracts to hedge its exposure to exchange
rate fluctuations of foreign currencies, particularly the Canadian dollar, the euro, the British pound, the Australian
dollar, the Brazilian real and the Mexican peso (see Note O for additional information concerning these hedges).
Based on the Company’s sensitivity analysis, the potential loss in fair value for such financial instruments from a
10% unfavorable change in quoted foreign currency exchange rates would be a loss of $30.4 related to contracts
outstanding at December 31, 2015, compared to a loss of $36.2 at December 31, 2014. These amounts would be
largely offset by changes in the values of the underlying hedged exposures.
93
O F F I C E R S A N D D I R E C T O R S
O F F I C E R S
Mark C. Pigott
Executive Chairman
Ronald E. Armstrong
Chief Executive Officer
Robert J. Christensen
President and
Chief Financial Officer
Gary L. Moore
Executive Vice President
Daniel D. Sobic (Retired 1/4/2016)
Executive Vice President
Michael T. Barkley
Senior Vice President and Controller
Robert A. Bengston
Senior Vice President
T. Kyle Quinn
Senior Vice President
David C. Anderson
Vice President and
General Counsel
Jack K. LeVier
Vice President
Marco A. Davila
Vice President
Harrie C.A.M. Schippers
Vice President
David J. Danforth
Vice President
R. Preston Feight
Vice President
Todd R. Hubbard
Vice President
William D. Jackson
Vice President
Elias B. Langholt
Vice President
Helene N. Mawyer
Vice President
Darrin C. Siver
Vice President
George E. West, Jr.
Vice President
Landon J. Sproull
Assistant Vice President
Ulrich Kammholz
Treasurer
Michael K. Walton
Secretary
D I R E C T O R S
Mark C. Pigott
Executive Chairman
PACCAR Inc (3)
Ronald E. Armstrong
Chief Executive Officer
PACCAR Inc
Kirk S. Hachigian
Chairman
JELD-WEN, inc. (2)
Luiz Kaufmann
Partner
L. Kaufmann Consultants (1)
Dame Alison J. Carnwath
Chairman
Land Securities Group PLC (1, 4)
Roderick C. McGeary
Former Vice Chairman
KPMG LLP (1, 4)
Beth E. Ford
Group Executive Vice President and
Chief Operating Officer
Land O’Lakes, Inc. (2)
John M. Pigott
Partner
Beta Business Ventures LLC (3)
Mark A. Schulz
Retired President,
International Operations
Ford Motor Company (2, 4)
Gregory M. E. Spierkel
Former Chief Executive Officer
Ingram Micro Inc. (1, 2)
Charles R. Williamson (Lead Director)
Former Chairman
Weyerhaeuser Company and
Former Chairman
Talisman Energy Inc. (3, 4)
C O M M I T T E E S O F T H E B O A R D
(1) Audit Committee
(2) Compensation Committee
(3) Executive Committee
(4) Nominating and Governance Committee
D I V I S I O N S A N D S U B S I D I A R I E S
PacLease Mexicana
S.A. de C.V.
Calzada Gustavo Vildósola
Castro 2000
Mexicali, Baja California
Mexico
PACCAR Financial
Services Ltd.
Markborough Place I
6711 Mississauga Road N.
Mississauga, Ontario
L5N 4J8 Canada
PACCAR Financial
Pty. Ltd.
64 Canterbury Road
Bayswater, Victoria 3153
Australia
PACCAR Leasing Company
Division of PACCAR
Financial Corp.
PACCAR Building
777 106th Avenue N.E.
Bellevue, Washington 98004
P A C C A R G L O B A L S A L E S
Division Headquarters:
10630 N.E. 38th Place
Kirkland, Washington 98033
Offices:
Beijing, People’s Republic
of China
Shanghai, People’s Republic
of China
Jakarta, Indonesia
Manama, Bahrain
Moscow, Russia
Pune, India
W I N C H E S
PACCAR Winch Division
Division Headquarters:
800 E. Dallas Street
Broken Arrow, Oklahoma
74012
Factories:
Broken Arrow, Oklahoma
Okmulgee, Oklahoma
P R O D U C T T E S T I N G ,
R E S E A R C H A N D
D E V E L O P M E N T
PACCAR Technical Center
Division Headquarters:
12479 Farm to Market Road
Mount Vernon, Washington
98273
DAF Trucks Test Center
Weverspad 2
5491 RL St. Oedenrode
The Netherlands
P A C C A R F I N A N C I A L
S E R V I C E S G R O U P
PACCAR Financial Corp.
PACCAR Building
777 106th Avenue N.E.
Bellevue, Washington 98004
PACCAR Financial
Europe B.V.
Hugo van der Goeslaan 1
P.O. Box 90065
5600 PT Eindhoven
The Netherlands
PACCAR Financial
México, S.A. de C.V.
Calzada Gustavo Vildósola
Castro 2000
Mexicali, Baja California
Mexico
Leyland Trucks Ltd.
Croston Road
Leyland, Preston
Lancashire PR26 6LZ
United Kingdom
Factory:
Leyland, Lancashire, United
Kingdom
Kenworth Mexicana,
S.A. de C.V.
Calzada Gustavo Vildósola
Castro 2000
Mexicali, Baja California
Mexico
Factory:
Mexicali, Baja California
Mexico
PACCAR
Australia Pty. Ltd.
Kenworth Trucks
Division Headquarters:
64 Canterbury Road
Bayswater, Victoria 3153
Australia
Factory:
Bayswater, Victoria, Australia
T R U C K P A R T S
A N D S U P P L I E S
PACCAR Engine Company
1000 PACCAR Drive
Columbus, Mississippi 39701
Factory:
Columbus, Mississippi
PACCAR Parts
Division Headquarters:
750 Houser Way N.
Renton, Washington 98057
Dynacraft
Division Headquarters:
650 Milwaukee Avenue N.
Algona, Washington 98001
Factories:
Algona, Washington
Louisville, Kentucky
94
T R U C K S
Kenworth Truck Company
Division Headquarters:
10630 N.E. 38th Place
Kirkland, Washington 98033
Factories:
Chillicothe, Ohio
Renton, Washington
Peterbilt Motors Company
Division Headquarters:
1700 Woodbrook Street
Denton, Texas 76205
Factory:
Denton, Texas
PACCAR of Canada Ltd.
Markborough Place I
6711 Mississauga Road N.
Mississauga, Ontario
L5N 4J8 Canada
Factory:
Ste.-Thérèse, Quebec, Canada
Canadian Kenworth
Company
Division Headquarters:
Markborough Place I
6711 Mississauga Road N.
Mississauga, Ontario
L5N 4J8 Canada
Peterbilt of Canada
Division Headquarters:
Markborough Place I
6711 Mississauga Road N.
Mississauga, Ontario
L5N 4J8 Canada
DAF Caminhões Brasil
Indústria Ltda.
Avenida Senador Flávio
Carvalho Guimarães, 6000
Bairro Boa Vista
CEP 84072-190
Ponta Grossa PR
Brasil
Factory:
Cidade de Ponta Grossa, Brasil
DAF Trucks N.V.
Hugo van der Goeslaan 1
P.O. Box 90065
5600 PT Eindhoven
The Netherlands
Factories:
Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Westerlo, Belgium
S T O C K H O L D E R S ’
I N F O R M A T I O N
Corporate Offices
PACCAR Building
777 106th Avenue N.E.
Bellevue, Washington
98004
Mailing Address
P.O. Box 1518
Bellevue, Washington
98009
Telephone
425.468.7400
Facsimile
425.468.8216
Website
www.paccar.com
Stock Transfer
and Dividend
Dispersing Agent
Wells Fargo Bank
Minnesota, N.A.
Shareowner Services
P.O. Box 64854
St. Paul, Minnesota
55164-0854
800.468.9716
www.shareowneronline.com
PACCAR’s transfer agent
maintains the company’s
shareholder records, issues
stock certificates and
distributes dividends and
IRS Forms 1099. Requests
concerning these matters
should be directed to
Wells Fargo.
Online Delivery of
Annual Report and Proxy
Statement
PACCAR’s 2015 Annual
Report and the 2016 Proxy
Statement are available
on PACCAR’s website at
www.paccar.com/
2016annualmeeting
Stockholders who hold
PACCAR stock in street
name may inquire of their
bank or broker about the
availability of electronic
delivery of annual
meeting documents.
DAF, Kenmex, Kenworth,
Leyland, PACCAR,
PACCAR MX-11,
PACCAR MX-13,
PACCAR PX, PacLease,
PacLink, Peterbilt, The
World’s Best, TRP and
SmartLINQ are trademarks
owned by PACCAR Inc and
its subsidiaries.
Independent Auditors
Ernst & Young LLP
Seattle, Washington
SEC Form 10-K
PACCAR’s annual report
to the Securities and
Exchange Commission
will be furnished to
stockholders on request
to the Corporate
Secretary, PACCAR Inc,
P.O. Box 1518, Bellevue,
Washington 98009. It is
also available online at
www.paccar.com/investors/
investor_resources.asp,
under SEC Filings or
on the SEC’s website at
www.sec.gov.
Annual Stockholders’
Meeting
April 26, 2016, 10:30 a.m.
Meydenbauer Center
11100 N.E. 6th Street,
Bellevue, Washington
98004
An Equal Opportunity
Employer
This report was printed
on recycled paper.